Slashdot Mirror


Philips vs Unlicensed DVD Players

Kallahar writes "NewScientist is running an article about how Phillips, Sony, and Pioneer have "asked customs officials throughout Europe to seize players made by unlicensed factories." Philips, Sony and Pioneer have pooled many hundreds of patents covering all aspects of the DVD system. Philips administers the pool, grants licences and collects royalties, which are then shared three ways." This comes on the heals of philips going after copy protected CDs. The draw for these DVD players for consumers is probably both price, and the fact that they are often free of those pesky region encodings (especially nice for anime junkies)

320 comments

  1. Yes you get price by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 1

    But with the unlicensed players you also get shoddy manufacturing quality, especially with the rise of counterfeit electronic components from the Shenzhen region of China.

    Buyer beware!

    --

    I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

    1. Re:Yes you get price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you go to ebay and find a used Apex 600a made on 9/99. Awesome quality, and will play any region dvd you throw at it... plus you can disable macrovision. Sweet!

    2. Re:Yes you get price by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd prefer not to waste my time buying new equipment to save cost. Not to mention downtime, etc. because you are waiting for your next player to be shipped.

      --

      I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

    3. Re:Yes you get price by Troed · · Score: 1

      Not to mention crap picture- and sound-quality. I have friends with these kind of players, and they look terrible compared to a 1st gen Sony 715 ...

    4. Re:Yes you get price by tempfile · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Today's typical mass produced consumer electronic device is manufactured just as shoddily. Unless you get into the real high end, the quality of the average product, esp. when compared with earlier times is catastrophic. My father's 30 year old record player still works like a charm, only few of today's DVD players will work in 30 years. Why? Because today cheapness always wins over quality and because with digital devices, shoddy manufacturing doesn't imply bad function.

    5. Re:Yes you get price by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not just because of the parts.

      In a record player, typically there aren't as many parts that are static, humidity and voltage sensative.

      Nor are there delicate bits of optical equipment with lenses and lasers and other solid state gear.

      It's like comparing the amount of maintance an F-105 needed compared to an F-15. Or the Folk-Wulf crews that bitched about the work it took to keep a Me-262 flying.

      My mom's Sony record player works like a charm, but it has about 1/8th the number of electrical systems a CD player has.

      It's apples and oranges to compare a record player with a CD/DVD player. A better comparision would be a 1st Gen LaserDisk or one of those magneto-optical disk drives from the early 80s and a DVD player from today.

    6. Re:Yes you get price by 13Echo · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and keep your Sony. At leat my Apex plays multi-region DVDs, and has picture and sound quality that is just as good, if not better than your player.

      Did I mention that it only costs $100?

    7. Re:Yes you get price by Troed · · Score: 1

      Yup .. cost me $150 to unlock it, and even then it can't play RCE titles ..

    8. Re:Yes you get price by Troed · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Your Apex has _crap_ picture and sound-quality, and yes, I can easily do a blind-test to prove it :) But it's ok if it's good enough for you of course.


      (I also buy quality speakers, cables, amplifiers, TV-sets etc ... )

    9. Re:Yes you get price by d0s · · Score: 1

      My Apex 703 plays whatever I throw at it, including MP3's and MPEGs burned directly to cd. Picture quality is beautiful on my Wega, with no rainbows or artifacts. Yeah, that's sure good enough for me. I paid $179.

    10. Re:Yes you get price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yup .. cost me $150 to unlock it, and even then it can't play RCE titles

      Sucker.

    11. Re:Yes you get price by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

      Why don't you just say they're made by prison labor, while you're at it?

      That would complete the standard unknowing anti-China diatribe.

      Jeez.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    12. Re:Yes you get price by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1
    13. Re:Yes you get price by Troed · · Score: 1

      I guess moderators with APEX players feel the truth hurting a bit .. *g*

    14. Re:Yes you get price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because a system is designed with circuits instead of mechanics is no excuse for shoddy workmanship. The fact that such attitudes exist is testament to the fact that the industry has convinced consumers that it's acceptable for something to break or go bad in a year or less. In my experience anything can be made to last, if the manufacturer wants it to.

      Why would they want it to though?

      I have friends who are already on their third DVD player, because the old ones wear out and stop working. Sure they bought $300 or under players, but they've done so three times now and will probably be buying again in a year or so.

      Planned obsolescence. If you don't think companies do this on purpose, you're naieve. I fronted the money for a quality DVD player ($900). Guess what? It still works as good now as the first day I hooked it up, and I've never encountered any mpeg errors with it. The same errors that lock up my friends players on a routine basis.

      The next time my friends replace their player, they will have spent more in total than I have. Thanks to the apathy most people have towards quality (in hardware or software) most manufacturers can actually get away with this.

    15. Re:Yes you get price by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Yes, you get reliability, but with licensed players you also get intentional incompatibility with most DVDs on the face of the planet, and copy protection that keeps you from doing anything that they don't want you to do with the small percentage of discs that are available to you.

      Buyer beware! ;)

    16. Re:Yes you get price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'a myth.

      Its like the myth of different CD players sounding different.

      Don't be a tool.

      All DVD players suck equally. Their resolution is crap and the color banding on virtually every DVD is just awful.

      But hey, at least its region protected, that makes it all worthwhile.

    17. Re:Yes you get price by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      Those examples are anecdotal evidence. So I'll throw in my own.

      Bottom of the line Sony 5 Disk changer from 1992, had it for 9 years, used it for 3-8 hours a day, every day for 9 years. It's still running. At work we had a 18 month old top of the line NAD, and a top of the line Denon, they burn out after 18 months like clockwork.

      The "planned obsolencence" thing has been bouncing around since WW2, my great-grandfather used to use it as an excuse in the 70s, it's just that, an excuse. The fact of the matter is that the majority of optical drives come from the same factories, even if you get a $900 one, it's the same gear as in the $300 one and thats what fails 90% of the time in a system.

      The fact of the matter is, modern systems are simply more vulerable to shock, static and mosture than older systems.

    18. Re:Yes you get price by Troed · · Score: 1
      Weird myth that I can spot with my own eyes then .. sorry, I think _you've_ fallen for a myth :)


      (CD players with digital output "sound" the same, if they have D/A's they certainly do not .. )

    19. Re:Yes you get price by mpe · · Score: 2

      My father's 30 year old record player still works like a charm, only few of today's DVD players will work in 30 years. Why? Because today cheapness always wins over quality and because with digital devices, shoddy manufacturing doesn't imply bad function.

      Also the device is expected to be obsolete in a few years (or a few months in the case of Japan), so what's the point of building it to last.

    20. Re:Yes you get price by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      That wouldn't be the 600a, would it? The sound quality isn't bad (with digital out), but the picture quality is just terrible. My Playstation2 has better picture quality than the Apex's.

  2. Which Ones? by govtcheez · · Score: 3, Funny

    "asked customs officials throughout Europe to seize players made by unlicensed factories."

    When reached for comment, spokesmen for Sony said that Phillips and Pioneer were considered unlicensed machines, Phillips spokespeople said Sony and Pioneer were unlicensed, and Pioneer said that Phillips and Sony were unlicensed.

  3. Hmm... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

    Is it me, or does this seem blatantly illegal?

    It also seems like the big guys (Philips, etc.) could hit these things with all sorts of potential incompatibilities.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    1. Re:Hmm... by spt · · Score: 1

      Philips has asked European Union Customs Authorities to impound unlicensed DVD-Video/ROM players and DVD-Video/ROM discs under the EU Council Regulation that covers goods that infringe patents

      No, if there's a law which say the import of things which violate patents is illegal then customs has a right (a duty, even!) to seize them.

    2. Re:Hmm... by damiangerous · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is it me, or does this seem blatantly illegal?

      It's just you, but you probably didn't read the article anyway.

      Philips has asked European Union Customs Authorities to impound unlicensed DVD-Video/ROM players and DVD-Video/ROM discs under the EU Council Regulation that covers goods that infringe patents.

      Are you familiar with the Regulation? Did you bother to look it up?
      Here it is: Bulletin EU 1/2-1999
    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not blatantly illegal. In fact, they're required to do it.

      For example, at a company I worked for, we held a patent on a particular kind of machine. This patent meant that no one could bring a similar kind of machine in to North America. We had a fellow that would "watch" orders to and from one of our overseas competitors. He would then notify the port authorities and when the device arrived, it would be impounded.

      The company held the patent and you cannot do an end-run around it by importing a device from a country where the patent is not held.

    4. Re:Hmm... by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      What I actually meant was "blatantly illegal to buy." I agree that Philips is doing what is legal.
      My real wonder is about when I buy it on eBay. What could be done to me when I try and import it from cousin Miroslav in Eastern Europe? I suppose Customs could seize it, etc., but are there any "real" penalties for the consumer?

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    5. Re:Hmm... by negativekarmanow+tm · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I don't think it's a customer's obligation to check if the manufacturer didn't break any laws in producing the goods.

      However, this would leave you with a bill for a product you never received. Who pays for that? What if you payed in advance?

      --
      No security through obscurity: my password is goatse. Stop me before I troll again.
    6. Re:Hmm... by russianspy · · Score: 1

      Is this really such a bad thing? They DO allow licenses. The product is not free and they have a right to make money off of the research. I think they made a better choice for the consumer. Who really pays when the "big fish" starts changing the standarts? By releasing disks that are not compatible with non-licensed machines they make it more difficult for the consumer.
      We all know how annoying it can be for a company to keep on changing their "standart" all the time. They decided to go after the guys who steal their business and possibly make inferior product. It's their technology/research. They have a right no protect it.

    7. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      buyer beware:

      "but officer, i didn't know marijuana was illegal!"

      "but officer, i didn't know this dvd player was illegal!"

    8. Re:Hmm... by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2

      We had a fellow that would "watch" orders to and from one of our overseas competitors.

      Interesting, So you worked with Echelon in order to do your work? Fascinating, please tell us more.
      When you sign up, can you get a webaccess interface or do you get a daily tape with information? I'd really like to know because we have been talking about it here at work to sign up for it also.

    9. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot. You know that you can't talk about that in public, now they are coming to get you for that message!!!!
      It was supposed to be a secret, you know!

    10. Re:Hmm... by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      I expect that if patent enforcement is really heavily dependent on this process, there is some legal channel for order monitoring set up.

    11. Re:Hmm... by Digital11 · · Score: 1

      A duty... HA! That's a good one... (Get it? Customs duty)

      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    12. Re:Hmm... by NightRain · · Score: 1

      All this is very easy to say for someone that no doubt lives in Region 1. If you live in any of the other regions out there, your selection of available DVDs suffers, and the features that you do get on the ones you can get nearly always fall behind their region 1 equivalent.

      So you'll excuse me if I happily go along with my non complaint Region free 'inferior' products and 'make it more difficult' for others like me.

      Ray.

    13. Re:Hmm... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      Interesting, So you worked with Echelon in order to do your work? Fascinating, please tell us more.
      Basically, it's like Adobe bitching to the FBI about Dmitri Skylakov being in Vegas.
  4. For the lazy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Supply of low-cost DVDs in Europe set to dry up

    14:45 12 February 02
    Barry Fox

    European supermarkets and high street electrical stores could soon see their supply of low-cost DVD players and discs dry up. Philips controls key patents on DVD technology and has grown tired of asking the manufacturers to pay royalties. The Dutch company has now asked customs officials throughout Europe to seize players made by unlicensed factories.

    Philips, Sony and Pioneer have pooled many hundreds of patents covering all aspects of the DVD system. Philips administers the pool, grants licences and collects royalties, which are then shared three ways.

    Most of the low-cost players come from factories in China. International trade newsletter TV Digest estimates China produces around 10 million DVD decks a year, mainly for export. European and North American importers then slap on Western brand name labels and sell them for under $100.

    Legal warning

    The DVD Forum, which sets the technical standards for DVD, lists several dozen factories in China. But only four of the factories have so far taken licences.

    As a first step towards policing the patent pool worldwide, Philips has asked European Union Customs Authorities to impound unlicensed DVD-Video/ROM players and DVD-Video/ROM discs under the EU Council Regulation that covers goods that infringe patents.

    Although there has been no formal announcement, Philips's legal website warns European importers that if they do not want their stocks stuck in Customs they should ask the factory to show them proof of a licence.

    Philips says that even if goods get through customs, the company will act against wholesale and retail traders.

    "The trade in unlicensed products may expose your company to liability for patent infringement" warn Philips' lawyers.

    1. Re:For the lazy.... by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is BS. The site is far from being /.ed, and so this post completely unnecessary. I don't care how lazy people are, this is wrong. If you want to continue to get good articles, support them by going to their site and registering a hit in their logs.

    2. Re:For the lazy.... by Dante_H · · Score: 2

      No, please don't stop this.

      At my work we can only see "authorised" websites, and Slashdot (oddly enough) is one of them. Pretty much all of the external links on Slashdot are inacessible to me, so I appreciate people posting the article, even if it is often just karma whoring.

    3. Re:For the lazy.... by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      Get a better job at a place without police-state filtering.

      Why should the rest us us suffer with extended page-load times caused by morons who post what's already available because YOU have braindead filters in place?

      It's also a copyright infringment and could get slashdot SUED, and SHUTDOWN. Is that what you want?

      THINK PEOPLE!

    4. Re:For the lazy.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why don't you find something else to bitch about you fucking loser

    5. Re:For the lazy.... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      You could speed your load time up by setting your display preferences at slashdot to minimum settings, that way you only get the links to the posts and not ny highlighted posts.

      And if some site sued slashdot over something like that, it would get posted here and then that company would have a lot of angry slashdotters to deal with (I'm sure the slashdot effect can apply to homepages too)

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:For the lazy.... by TeraCo · · Score: 1
      And if some site sued slashdot over something like that, it would get posted here and then that company would have a lot of angry slashdotters to deal with (I'm sure the slashdot effect can apply to homepages too)

      And if it's someone like Microsoft doing the suing? Yeah, I can seem them shaking in their boots at the thought of Slashdotters being angry at them.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    7. Re:For the lazy.... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Microsoft picking on a news forum because they copy cut and pasted the text of an article so that more people could access it at any given time would be a very bad PR scene, and with the lense that Microsoft is being watched under, that would be bad for them.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  5. Wonder when M$... by Arimus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Will decide to find some arguement that they've licenced the GUI (yes I mean GUI) and get customs to confiscate all other OSes that have any form of GUI..

    But seriously yet again the consumer is going lose.
    'branded players' -- more expensive but sometimes better quality...
    'unbranded' -- cheaper and sometime shoddy.

    Let the consumer decide - over time the shoddy players will become history, the cheap but good players will become brand names etc...

    Score: Big Corp's 1; public 0; little corps -1

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    1. Re:Wonder when M$... by mikewas · · Score: 3

      If we don't enforce patent rights, then we'll lose. Patents are a monopoly, for a limited period of time. This encourages R&D, because investors know they'll have some time to recover their investment & profit from their R&D. It also exposes the new technology created, so that others can learn from it even though they can't use it for free.

      There's always the right of others to do the same thing in a different way. If the original patent isn't the best solution for a problem then somebody will come up with a new, better, cheaper alternative (an patent that, if they wish).

      So the question is: "If there weren't a patent system in place, would anybody have invested time, effort & money into developing DVDs? Would the consumer even have them as a choice?"

      The the other question: "Where do I get one of these cheap DVD players before they're all pulled from the shelf?"

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    2. Re:Wonder when M$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Will you still defend patents when the WTO makes governments extend patents to 100 years? Patents make sense as long as the duration is short, say five years. In other words, you have five years from the time your product hits the market to make a monopoly profit. The only qualm is that they create a "standard" and then patent it. Standards are meant for interoperability. Who cares about interoperability if you are the sole controller of said technology.

      To answer your question, yes. Someone would have developed some kind of DVD like video system. Why? Quality in movies. The studios love DVDs and would have at some point created this technology.

    3. Re:Wonder when M$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If we don't enforce patent rights, then we'll lose. Patents are a monopoly, for a limited period of time. This encourages R&D,"

      I frankly don't care any more.

      The DVD is an inferior product with all types of protections that treat me, their customer, like a theif.

      So I choose to take the path that screws with these cretins the most ways possible.

      I use chinese DVD players and rent my movies.

      I'm doing humanity a FAVOR. What are you doing except defending the screwing of the consumer?

    4. Re:Wonder when M$... by mikewas · · Score: 1

      No -- I won't. But I also won't throw out the entire patent system because of this one issue! Have these companies benefitted greatly from these particular patents? Yes. Have they benefitted from all of their patents? No. Overall, have their benefits exceeded their expense? I presume so since they are still in business -- it's called capitalism. Overall is the patent system's cost-benefit ratio to the public at large optimal -- I doubt it, so let's work on making it better.

      There's a trade-off between benefits to general-public and benefits to the patent-holder. Patents should, like all of our laws, maximize benefit to the general-public. The general-public, more so its technically capable members such as those on these fora, must be aware of what's happenning & assure that the process remains beneficial to all.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
    5. Re:Wonder when M$... by mikewas · · Score: 1

      You say that DVD is inferior -- then why are you using it? To be inferior requires that there be something better, that fact that you still use it means that it is not inferior, at least not in the aggregate benefits to you.

      Many people on flashdot owe their livlihood to the intellectual property they produce. I presume that most, like me, work for companies that use legal protections for their IP -- patents, copyrights, trade secrets. Even if you GPL your code, you're taking advantage of this legal system albeit in a scheme that is more informal & somewhat like barter.

      At least the sales of real DVD players would fund & encourage Phillips' development of other technologies. So your scheme does what? How does it help anybody except yourself?

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  6. Nothing special ... by NWT · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I suppose they're doing what (they suppose) is best for them, without caring about others. They're trying to push other manufacturers out of business, or they want them to pay ...
    It's tough but that's the way how it goes, it's the same in every branch of today's business! *sigh*

    - Reality bites, but that's what life is ...

    --
    Life sucks.
    1. Re:Nothing special ... by darkov · · Score: 2

      I think you have to accept the only reason we have DVD players at all is because these patents exist and are enforceable. Why would any company spend the money to develop product if they couldn't exploit it? This is what patents are for.

    2. Re:Nothing special ... by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

      This is what patents are for! Patents are meant to be a temporary security to encourage companies and individuals to invent new technologies. Phillips, Pioneer, and Sony have a collective patent for their invention if you will of the DVD-player. If you or I had invented it and had the patent, you'd do the same thing they are. There is nothing unfair about requiring people to obey the laws, everyone is (should be) bound to them.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    3. Re:Nothing special ... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Next thing, you'll be asking that the companies actively *help* their own competitors...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    4. Re:Nothing special ... by NWT · · Score: 1

      I disagree! Everyone knows that competitioun is both good, for us (the customers) and for the companies themselwes ...
      But in my opinion Philipps &co. have a monopoly an this is no good! Small firms can't pay the fees for the patents and they will create new "standarts" ... just look at the DVD writers, there are no less than 4 formats to write DVD's (DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, DVD-RAM ...)

      --
      Life sucks.
    5. Re:Nothing special ... by MrDolby · · Score: 1

      Yeah aren't they jerks. Phillips, Sony, and Pioneer spend huge amounts of money developing the DVD standard and getting people to use it, and also taking on the Risk of failure if people didn't migrate over from VHS.

      Then what happens is some other companies "Righteous companies in your opinion" decide that Phillips, Sony, and Pioneer did all the hard work developing the technology and getting people to buy it. Now they can make the same product and sell it slightly cheaper and cash in.

      Come on. DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND THIS IS THE REASON PATENTS EXIST.

    6. Re:Nothing special ... by Grab · · Score: 2

      Doh! If there's multiple companies, it's not a monopoly. Look it up in a dictionary.

      You're contradicting yourself. Either it's good for one company (or a group of companies) to come up with a standard, or it's good for everyone to have competing formats and wait for consumers to decide on one. After VHS/Betamax, customers simply will _not_ buy anything where the industry's relying on the second option; think of all the next-gen floppy disks which came and went before the CD-ROM (with a fixed standard) became the norm.

      If one company/group does it, they'll be putting in significant amounts of money and time for research, so other companies save themselves an R&D budget by licensing that research.

      As far as getting fees back goes, work it out. Philips and co spend years working on the successor to CDs, investing millions in R&D. If they can't get a return on that investment, that money is just gone, man. And if they can't get a return on investing in new products, they won't - they'll just steal off someone else who's come up with a new idea. Eventually no-one produces anything new, bcos it's not in anyone's interest to do so. Great idea, dude.

      Grab.

  7. Memo to Customs Officers by Stavr0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    From: European Union Border Enforcement Agency
    To: All E.U. Customs Officers
    Subject: New directive

    Effective immediately,
    All efforts to halt drug contraband, illegal alien smuggling and terrorist infiltration is to be suspended. The biggest threat to EU today are unlicensed DVD players. Me must put a stop to this terrible instrument, and protect the children from the ravages of illegal region code hacking.

    1. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by damiangerous · · Score: 2

      All efforts to halt drug contraband, illegal alien smuggling and terrorist infiltration is to be suspended. The biggest threat to EU today are unlicensed DVD players. Me must put a stop to this terrible instrument, and protect the children from the ravages of illegal region code hacking

      Why does someone always bring this sort of thing up? Are you the sort of person who tells a police officer giving you a traffic ticket that he should be out solving murders rather than worrying about your broken taillight?
      Customs Officials are responsible for screening everything that comes into the country. It's not a zero sum game, they don't have to let an opium shipment go by to impound a DVD player. They're inspecting that shipment of DVD players anyway. Impounding it is hardly an allocation of resources beyond extra warhouse workers to move and store them.

    2. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why does someone always bring this sort of thing up? Are you the sort of person who tells a police officer giving you a traffic ticket that he should be out solving murders rather than worrying about your broken taillight?

      I, for one, would feel much more comfortable if the police spent half the effort they put into pulling people over with broken taillights into solving/preventing real crimes instead. I once got pulled over because my license plate was dirty (thankfully they weren't anal enough to give me a ticket).

      It speaks volumes about our society when we focus so much energy and resources on less important things (eg. stopping a guy going 5 over the speed limit) while neglecting more important things (eg. solving a rape case).

    3. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by colnago · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      it's funny - laugh

    4. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by xonker · · Score: 1

      Why does someone always bring this sort of thing up?

      Because people see "this sort of thing" as an annoyance -- and most people feel that law enforcement spends too much time enforcing things like traffic laws, and not enough time chasing down criminals. Admittedly, this feeling is usually heightened when you're the person being pulled over...

      Are you the sort of person who tells a police officer giving you a traffic ticket that he should be out solving murders rather than worrying about your broken taillight?

      I don't know about the original poster, but no -- I'm not. I might write a letter to the editor or to the chief of police if I felt strongly about it, but the guy doing the ticketing is usually not choosing to be on the traffic beat. They're assigned to it, and I don't feel they deserve any flack. I also have to say that most of the times I've been pulled over, I've been pleasantly surprised how polite the officer has been -- and most of the highway patrol guys genuinely do care about motorists and don't want to see people speeding -- probably because they've seen one too many accidents.

      The same with the customs agents -- their boss says "impound x brand DVD players" then that's what they should do. We should be making noise with the legislators and the people who run the customs offices -- not the poor schlub barely making a living by checking imports all day.

      It's not a zero sum game, they don't have to let an opium shipment go by to impound a DVD player.

      Well, no...they don't have to -- but there is a limit to how much they can do and how much manpower the customs office has.

      They should definitely impound DVD players with opium stored in them. I think we can all agree on that. :)

    5. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by DodgyGeezer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There has to be a real and credible threat of getting ticketed for violating traffic laws. If there wasn't, there would be more deaths and injuries on the roads, and our insurance rates would probably go up. On top of that, this is a cheap revenue source... or would you rather pay more taxes so the "real crimes" can be solved?

      You chose to break the law, either through negligence or laziness or premeditation. Don't whine about it. If you disagree with the law, petition your elected representatives. That's how democracy works.

      Right now I would like the police to pull over more people who haven't swept the snow of their cars, or cleaned their lights of salt and grit, or who have misaligned headlights. It will make my driving easier and safer.

    6. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Are you the sort of person who tells a police officer giving you a traffic ticket that he should be out solving murders rather than worrying about your broken taillight?

      Yes I am, in fact I've told the 3 traffic cops on my route to/from work words to that effect thousands of times as they've pulled me over during the last 6 years. One day they'll learn!

      Seriously though, these IP and patent cases are all to the detriment of the consumer. Imagine if the same enforcements had been in place for the last couple of hundred years. We'd all be driving one make of car, there would be only one manufacturer of TVs and computer displays, one supermarket, and a single shop chain making shoes. We've already seen the problems one monopoly has caused in the world of computer software, yet governments and patent offices constantly strive to give others the power to create yet more monopolies and cartels... <Sigh>

    7. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how do you see with your head so far up your ass?

      Must be a cop.

    8. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by jslag · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's not a zero sum game, they don't have to let an opium shipment go by to impound a DVD player.


      Actually, it is a zero sum game. Time spent by customs officials maintaining & checking a list of 'official' DVD players, rejecting & filing paperwork for noncompliant players, etc. is time that can't be spent checking for goods that are (presumably) more threatening to our national well-being.

    9. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1
      Why does someone always bring this sort of thing up?

      Because people see "this sort of thing" as an annoyance -- and most people feel that law enforcement spends too much time enforcing things like traffic laws, and not enough time chasing down criminals. Admittedly, this feeling is usually heightened when you're the person being pulled over...

      Man, people are really clueless... Define "criminal"! -- One that has committed or been legally convicted of a crime -- Well, damn, having a broken tail light is against the law. Breaking the law therefore makes you a criminal. If somone were to rearend you and die because of the broken tail light would you then not be a murderer? I guess then the cop pulling you over is being proactive rather than reactive which is what PREVENTS accidents/crimes...

      Anyway, BOT, the US is a Capatilistic society, if you want Communism go somewhere else. Patents are put into place to protect corporations as well as consumers. If we didn't have patents, or didn't enforce patents, then nothing would get innovated. We wouldn't have cures for common diseases and even less common diseases. Would we have Celexa, Paxil, Zoloft, Wellbutrin, etc... if every company were able to make Prozac? Since Prozac is patented other companies wanting to compete in the SSRI market needed to create there own "imitation", in doing so they've created, in some ways, better medications (less side-effects)...

      If these Chinese "knock-off" artists want to legally compete with DVD then they should invent a better standard (20GB discs, blue-laser, etc...) instead of "ripping off" the REAL developers. OTOH, corporations (Sony, Phillips, Pioneer, et.al.) shouldn't "rip off" consumers with overly high prices...

    10. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe you shouldn't be breaking the law so much. Police don't tend to pull people over for no reason, though there are exceptions.

      Microsoft being a Monopoly is not a bad thing. It just proves that being the most successful in your field will set you above the rest. The problem with Microsoft is the use of their Monopolistic power. If Microsoft used this power to innovate and actually help consumers would it be a bad thing? Until something better comes along (more consumer friendly, cheaper, prettier, etc...) MS will stay on top. Before you spout off that I'm pro-Microsoft nothing could be further from the truth. I don't buy MS products anymore, I use Linux, Solaris and OSF at work, OS X on my Powerbook, Palm OS on my Visor and play games on my GCN, my home Windows 98 box hasn't been powered on in over 6 months. Now, if everyone did as my family Microsoft wouldn't be a Monopoly now would it? So get out there and buy non-MS products, MS didn't become a Monopoly by taking a nap...

    11. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by xonker · · Score: 1

      I think 99.9% of people would agree that breaking a misdemeanor traffic law is not sufficient to consider a person a "criminal." That's why there are traffic courts, and job applications specifically disregard traffic offenses as being convicted of a crime. Perhaps I should have said "felons" rather than "criminal" but any reasonable person would have understood the point without clarification.

      If somone were to rearend you and die because of the broken tail light would you then not be a murderer?

      No. Murder is when you kill someone with "malice aforethought." You have to intend to kill someone to murder them. If your unintentional actions cause the death of another person it would be negligent homicide or involuntary manslaughter. I doubt any court would even convict someone of manslaughter or negligent homicide because of a busted tail-light. You might make an argument that a drunk driver who kills someone is a murderer -- they should have foreseen that their actions were very likely to result in the death of another person or persons, but someone who has a burnt-out tail light is not in this category. Besides, you'd really have to have several lights burned out not just one.

      You're also ignoring the remainder of my post. I don't fault traffic officers for pulling people over, I just stated that most people -- particularly when pulled over -- feel that the police force could be pursuing criminals, by which I meant people who actively participate in criminal behaviour such as dealing drugs, killing or raping others, burglary or other notorious behaviour. If the average person considered speeding to be criminal behaviour they would not engage in the practice, and we'd really not need the traffic officers in the first place. Or do you intend to argue that we're a society of criminals?

      Anyway, BOT, the US is a Capatilistic society, if you want Communism go somewhere else.

      Not sure who you're addressing here. I never mentioned anything about patents.

      The US is also a society that is supposed to embrace free speech -- hardly an attitude that shows through an intolerant phrase like "if you don't like it go somewhere else!" If that's the best rhetoric you can summon to make a point, perhaps you should just think a little longer before piping up.

      Also, patents were never devised to be used as they're used today. Patents aren't used to protect an idea -- they're used as legal gotchas by companies to attempt to discourage competition. I'm pretty sure the framers of the constitution would have been horrified by the idea of "region encoding" and other tools used to try to stifle fair use and free trade.

    12. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1
      I think 99.9% of people would agree that breaking a misdemeanor traffic law is not sufficient to consider a person a "criminal."

      Yes, but the laws were placed there for a reason. If you weren't stopped for traffic violations then why have traffic laws at all? It's the police officer's JOB to pull you over. Just as much as it's a cashiers job to take your money for products you buy. Besides, in pulling over people for petty crimes such as a burnt out tail light they may find a more serious infraction such as a warrant for that persons arrest. Again, this is being proactive which is a good thing. How many felonies have been or could be prevented because of being arrested/detained due to other "pettier" violations?

      Food for thought, what if it were still legal to smoke on airplanes? Would it have been suspicious then if a flight attendant smelled/heard/saw a match being lit?

      BOT (Back On Topic), sorry, should have pointed that out in my post...

      I didn't say "if you don't like it go somewhere else!", I said "if you want Communism go somewhere else" there is a huge difference.

      U.S. Constitution Article 1, Section 8
      To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;

      Patents aren't used to protect an idea -- they're used as legal gotchas by companies to attempt to discourage competition.

      I'm lost here, please describe to me the difference...

    13. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by billcopc · · Score: 2

      Are you the sort of person who tells a police officer giving you a traffic ticket that he should be out solving murders rather than worrying about your broken taillight?

      Um, Yes? A cop doing radar is a cop wasting everybody's time and money, indeed there are much more severe crimes to be identified and punished than someone doing 30 over on a deserted highway at 5 a.m. Most police organisations have become fund raisers, instead of security agents. They will sit in their car and watch you get jumped by 3 guys, and then they arrest YOU for being a troublemaker. Police agents should inspire trust and safety in citizens, not fear.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    14. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by FyRE666 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft being a Monopoly is not a bad thing. It just proves that being the most successful in your field will set you above the rest.

      I'm not sure what your definition of successful is, with relation to MS. It's certainly not creating particularly efficient or reliable software, or, as you say, innovating. The only areas in which the company appear to excel are stealing ideas, bullying "partners" and spreading downright lies. Their only goal is making money. The only way they're above the rest is if the rest are Mafia crime families.

      Obviously they're never going to innovate; after all they've made all their money by stealing ideas and arm-twisting. Why bother innovating when you can just wait for someone else to do it for you?

      BTW, it was a joke, I haven't really been pulled over thousands of times for speeding...

    15. Re:Memo to Customs Officers by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1, Troll
      Police agents should inspire trust and safety in citizens, not fear.
      Well, if you're a nigger, that's not OUR problem.
  8. Re:ispell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Is it that difficult to use?"

    ispell doesn't exactly help when the misspelling is also a valid word. Idiot.

  9. ODK mod kills region codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Fazigu ODK hack renders region coding useless. No soldering either!

    thank you

    1. Re:ODK mod kills region codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you trolling, Quinn?

  10. Re:anime is for losers by ajaygautam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I diagree. I have seen some of the best animations in Anime. Well, its a free world, if you don't like it, don't see it. I guess nobody is forcing you to see it ! Posting as an "Anonymous Coward" does say a lot about you ;->

    --
    http://www.ajaygautam.com
  11. Apex 600a by happycat64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's why you go to ebay and find an Apex 600a while you still can. Very excellent machine, will play any region disk you throw at it, dolby digital out, and you can disable macrovision. The newer unlicensed dvd players are of pretty shoddy quality.

    1. Re:Apex 600a by puck01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From what I've read over at the Apex Forums Phillips is stopping the sale of Apex600a players on Ebay. Here is a link to that thread.

      Here is a copy of the letter sent to people trying to sell the Apex600a on Ebay:

      Dear Sir:

      Sorry for your frustration. As our previous message states, as the patent holder, we have a right to stop ANY sale of an unlicensed product, and at this writing, the manufacturer of Oritron and Apex DVD players is chosing to be unlicensed. It is the Manufacturer of the player who is unlicensed, and therefore ANY sale of the product infringes our patents (NOT trademarks). The patents are on the DVD technology.

      We are sorry for this inconvenience to you, but at this time you cannot sell this DVD player on eBay. Please be assured that we are working on this at many levels and we hope the manufacturer becomes licensed soon.

      Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

      Regards,
      Ginger Affolter
      IP Assistant

      Philips Intellectual Property & Standards
      PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA CORP.
      1000 W. Maude Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94085-2810

      E-mail: ginger.affolter@philips.com
      Web-site: www.licensing.philips.com


      I just did a couple quick seaches for 'apex600a' and 'apex 600'. I got no results. So, you can legally buy an Apex600a in the US, like I did from Best Buy, but it is now not allowed to resell it on Ebay. That makes sense.

      puck

    2. Re:Apex 600a by puck01 · · Score: 1

      I did some more searching. Searching for "apex 600a" on Ebay, I was able to find about 10-12 players for sale currently. So, it appears Phillips has in the past closed the auctions for the Apex600a, but is not currently doing so.

      puck

    3. Re:Apex 600a by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      You may want to consider the Malata DVD-N996 instead. Its region free and does a very good job of PAL to NTSC conversion. I don't know if its licensed or not, but at $300 it is one very capable player.

    4. Re:Apex 600a by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 2
      So, you can legally buy an Apex600a in the US, like I did from Best Buy, but it is now not allowed to resell it on Ebay.
      I found one.
      --

      ~shiny
      WILL HACK FOR $$$

    5. Re:Apex 600a by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The 660 is a suitable substitute. Out of the box, it doesn't have the compatibility problems of the non-upgraded 600a.

      The only thing that it really lacks it TOSlink and component video. Those can be added into the machines with mods.

      What is really nice about the 660 is that many of them can be software upgraded. Just burn a bootable image to a disk and put it in... Region 0/1 switchability and a few other "enhancements."

    6. Re:Apex 600a by Mantorp · · Score: 1

      The newer ones don't have the loophole menu. Check Apex AD-600A Info Pages.

    7. Re:Apex 600a by 91degrees · · Score: 1
      There are quite a few modifed players that can deal with different region codes. Most of the players available in Europe have third party modifications (although a PAL compatible TV is required if you want to use them in the US). There is also a cartridge available for the PS2 that allows this.


      Anyway - I don't think that Phillips really care about region mods. They only added it to the spec because Hollywood wouldn't have supported the standard otherwise. A fair number of their players can be hacked using a One-for-all remote control. The main concern for them is most likely the unfair competition from comapnies that are making players but did not contribute to development costs.

    8. Re:Apex 600a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or you can go to the local Circuit City and pick up a new Apex AD-1500 for about $80. Then, perform a CDR firmware upgrade. Worked for me!

    9. Re:Apex 600a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Ginger Affolter really say "chosing?"

      Hmmm...

    10. Re:Apex 600a by shreak · · Score: 1

      I bought an Apex 1500 and a friend bought an Apex 1000 over X-mas. Both are firmware upgradeable (Insert a CD-ROM with the firmware image and it's all automatic). With a minimal search you can find firmware images with macrovision and region codeing turned off (no menu required) You can even put in your own image for the screen saver. Forget knock-offs, just hack the valid ones.

    11. Re:Apex 600a by dedicke · · Score: 0

      Philipps shut down my auction for this model DVD 24 hours after it started. Luckily someone had already used Buy It Now, and payment went through shortly after the auction was shut down. I e-mailed Phillips copyright bitch and told her to go to hell. This is America, I won't stand for fascism!

      --
      raretshirts.com - cool vintage t-shirts
    12. Re:Apex 600a by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      sure it makes sense. if u sell your player, the buyer buys your old one, and u buy a new one.

      if u can't sell your player, the one who would have bought it buys a new one, and u buy a new one.

    13. Re:Apex 600a by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      Or they simply haven't caught those auctions -yet-, but might before they close.

  12. They can ask that these machines be seized, but... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this going to be the top priority for European enforcement? I really doubt it.

    I think that from the perspective of deciding how to use their resources, European nations have have bigger concerns than where the DVD players are coming from... and any associated patent issues.

    A few might be taken off the streets, but I doubt they are going to expend great resources to rid Europe of "unauthorized" or "unlicensed" machines...

    Sam Nitzberg
    sam@iamsam.com
    http://www.iamsam.com

  13. Motivation by mlong · · Score: 1

    Obviously Philips is going after anything which hurts their hardware sales. This is both good for consumers (no cd copy protection) and bad for consumers (going after other hardware companies)

    --
    //m
  14. Okay, so what's the problem? by mosch · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I fail to see the issue. Some companies which created some great technologies are enforcing their legal right to get license fees for those technologies. This is how patents are SUPPOSED to work!

    Where's the incentive to create if it's legal to just steal the invention and pay nothing?

    1. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by forgetful_ca · · Score: 0

      "The issue", as another poster has already pointed out, is that 3 corporations are attempting to use customs as their own enforcement. Until there is a civil suit judging the not-licensed manufacturers illegal, customs can't (shouldn't) attempt to contradict anything. The bottom line, corporations shouldn't be allowed to control law enforcement. Period. As soon as you do, the corporations ARE the government and all the worst cyberpunk plots you ever heard of come true.

    2. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst of cyberpunk doesn't even come close to reality offered by previous GOVERNMENT run regimes, so please kindly shut the fuck up and stay that way.

    3. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Carl · · Score: 1, Troll
      > Where's the incentive to create if it's legal to just steal the invention and pay nothing?

      You say steal but you seem to mean reuse.

      Look at the GNU project, the Apache project(s), the Linux kernel, the *BSDs, count the number of Debian packages, all the applications on Savannah, Sourceforce and Freshmeat. Look at all the great technologies created at Universities (which are often the basis of those "great" technologies, or cheap ripoffs if you like, that are sold in the industry).

      There are a lot of more incentives to create great technology then making lots of money of it. Focussing on how to make money on something often

      You might want to read Anarchism Triumphant by Eben Moglen who explains this a lot better then I can.

    4. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by forgetful_ca · · Score: 0

      >> So please kindly shut the fuck up and stay that way.

      one of "Please" or "kindly" under that usage, not both. Both is unnecessarily extra and redundant. And not needed.

      As to the part of your post that was relevant I would say that the point here is restricting corporations from taking over. It presupposes that the government is already in check. A big if, sure. If it's not already true, the population in question has much bigger problems than whether region codes and patents are being honoured.

    5. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are reasons to create other than profit. Very true. However the existance of those other reasons does not invalidate profit as a valid reason. If you want to create, and improve the world for your fellow man, that is fine and good, may you recieve awards, recognition, and passage through the pearly gates. If I choose to go for profit, your altruism does not allow you to trump me and take away my profits.

    6. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you are perfectly fine with Fraunhofer going after the developers of mp3 encoders?

    7. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Carl · · Score: 2

      I see that my original post has been marked as Troll so I must have misunderstood the question.
      Or posted flamebait. Hmmm.

      The original question was why you should have incentive to create if you weren't paid for it. In this case, this consortium even wants to be paid a lot of money for the ideas that they believe they created.

      What I wanted to say is that there are indeed other reasons to create then the profit motive. Eben Mogel even explains why to sustain creation we do not even need the profit approach as primary motive.

      In this case we even see the "lets make it illegal to use, copy and/or improve through patents" approach.

      You say:
      > If I choose to go for profit, your altruism does not allow
      > you to trump me and take away my profits.

      I am not a native speaker so I am not sure I have the meaning of to trump correct. It seems to mean that I play a winning card in a game, but also that there was something tricky and misleading going on.

      I believe that people have a right to earn a living, but I don't think that coorporations are automatically entitled to (huge) profits. Capatalism wouldn't work if we didn't have competition (but competition does not always have to come from the profit motive!). Stifling innovation with patent (claims) is something I do not approve of.

    8. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you heard? Stuff wants to be free. Or something.

    9. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

      The point is that the innovation is stimulated by patents. Sony and Panason and Phillips et al are interested in profit. Profit for themselves and their shareholders. They invested time and money in a new product, because of the guarantee the patenet gave them that they would be able to profit from any resultant inventions.

      Yes, at this exact moment in time, if you gave away their IP, there would be some increase in innovation (but mostly just people mass producing stuff cheap)

      However, the next "big thing" might not get invented, because it isnt in anyones interest to invest the R&D. It is more efficient to wait for someone else to develop it, and then steal the idea.

    10. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "The point is that the innovation is stimulated by patents. "
      Myth.
      People have been creating LONG before the idea of patents and copyrights.
      People who create, will always create.

      In todays market, the creater gets less then they would if they invented it themselfs anyways.
      Plus corporations need to make money, they would find a way to survive in a world with no patents.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by mpe · · Score: 2

      The point is that the innovation is stimulated by patents.

      The aim of patents is to encourage publication and use of inventions.

      They invested time and money in a new product, because of the guarantee the patenet gave them that they would be able to profit from any resultant inventions.

      Investing time and money in something does not guarentee that anyone will make money out of it. What a patent does mean that if money can be made on a certain invention the patent holder gets "first dibs".

    12. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by mpe · · Score: 2

      The bottom line, corporations shouldn't be allowed to control law enforcement. Period. As soon as you do, the corporations ARE the government

      Problem is that in places like the US corporate interests have been controlling government actions for a long time. You have the BSA using federal "law enforcement" as another example. Let alone that most of the time agents of the US government has enguaged in terrorism against other governments there has been a corporate interest (sugar, fruit or oil) involved.

    13. Re:Okay, so what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck aye. Software patents forever. Down with illegal MP3 encoder authors!

  15. Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by joshamania · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Saying this is contradictory to Phillips's position on copy protected CD's is not correct. Phillips going after illegal DVD manufacturers is very similar to them chafing against copy protected CD's.

    Someone is using a format that they invented, have the patent on, and should for a reasonable time, have the ability to apportion the use of that patent(s) out as they will. The difference here is that the folks they are going after are making money "stealing" Phillips's technology, unlike a certain sixteen year old kid from Norway.

    While I don't agree with everything they do with their patents (region encoding is complete bullshit theivery....glad I don't live in the UK and have to pay $30 per DVD), this is a relatively new technology and they do hold the patent...this is what patents are for, to keep lazy assholes from making money off you your invention for a certain period of time.

    1. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      The difference here is that the folks they are going after are making money "stealing" Phillips's technology, unlike a certain sixteen year old kid from Norway ... While I don't agree with everything they do with their patents (region encoding is complete bullshit theivery....glad I don't live in the UK and have to pay $30 per DVD)

      Somebody clear this up for me. I was not aware that CSS, which is the mechanism for enforcing region-coding, was protected by a patent. Rather, I was under the impression that individuals who manufacture CSS workarounds are in violation of various copyright laws, not patents. Are the DeCSS folks actually being accused patent violation as well?

    2. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      He's combining a couple of issues here. Phillips and other hold all sorts of patents on DVDs. The technology is new enough, they developed it, they want to make money off it. That's no big deal. Granted I imagine the unlicensed manufacturers are also violating the CSS copyrights, but that's not what they care about in this case.

    3. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by jakew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do live in the UK, and a bit over half of my DVDs are imported from the USA. Partly because of the cost, but mostly because I'm not prepared to wait for six months for them to release a film here, assuming they bother at all.

      Almost all of my videos are imported, simply because I can't buy them here.

      I don't know if it made it to slashdot - probably not - but a week or two ago there was a High Court judge over here who declared that playing an imported PS2 game infringed the copyright because it was licenced for another region and kept a temporary copy in memory. (I'm getting sick of this temporary copy rubbish - it's really a bit of a stretch). Many people pointed out that the same logic applies to DVDs, so it's apparently illegal for me to watch my imported DVDs now.

      Is it just me, or does anyone else find their respect for the law lessens every day? I'm going home shortly and will probably infringe copyright. Do I care? Yes. Do I think I'm doing anything even slightly immoral? No. Will the law make a difference? No. Will it make a difference to customs for future imports? I hope not.

      Where do I sign up for the revolution?

    4. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      He's combining a couple of issues here ... Granted I imagine the unlicensed manufacturers are also violating the CSS copyrights, but that's not what they care about in this case

      No, I realize that's not what this case is about. The previous poster lost me here:

      The difference here is that the folks they are going after are making money "stealing" Phillips's technology, unlike a certain sixteen year old kid from Norway
      Which seemed to imply that the only difference between the DeCSS crowd and these rip-off manufacturers was that the latter were making money. But clearly there are many fundamental differences. I suppose it was just hyperbole, but it's an issue that doesn't need any more confusion. Thanks for answering.
    5. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      This article raises an interesting question for me. If the DVD-ROM manufacturer paid a license fee to sell the drive, aren't they getting their money from DeCSS users? It has no application to this case, but only in regards to DeCSS. If the Phillips, etc. get their money from the drive manufacturer, and they get their money from the disc producer, why is it so important that they also get their money from the software producer? It can't be that much. Considering that even licensed DVD players are sold for less than $200, we know the licensing fees aren't too high.

      The real money is in the software. Yet they are so paranoid about that small minority that wants to pirate, that they refuse to let people play software they bought on their linux or other OSes without a licensed player. This just doesn't make a lot of sense.

    6. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      If the DVD-ROM manufacturer paid a license fee to sell the drive, aren't they getting their money from DeCSS users?

      I'm not entirely sure what you're saying. That most DVD-ROM owners use DeCSS (the name of the "illegal" CSS decryptor)? I'm not sure about that... I think the majority of DVD-ROM owners use it to read DVD-ROMs, CD-ROMS, and legally play DVD videos (either directly from the video-out port of the DVD player, or through some proprietary software.)

      If the Phillips, etc. get their money from the drive manufacturer, and they get their money from the disc producer, why is it so important that they also get their money from the software producer?

      I don't think that Phillips owns CSS. It's held by a consortium, which itself is heavily controlled by the movie studios. If the studios couldn't control CSS, they'd just create something that they could control. And the issue for licensing CSS has never been about making tons of money... Rather, it's just a way for the studios to control who gets to play their videos, and to insure that any manufacturer looking to build commercial DVD players has to sign a long contract promising not to build region-free players, etc.

      The existence of CSS is also great for large electronics companies like Phillips, who have the clout to enter into sweetheart CSS licensing deals for almost nothing, knowing that 3rd party software products and smaller companies can't easily compete with them (can't get a license from the CSS consortium.)

    7. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saying this is contradictory to Phillips's position on copy protected CD's is not correct. Phillips going after illegal DVD manufacturers is very similar to them chafing against copy protected CD's.
      Someone is using a format that they invented, have the patent on, and should for a reasonable time, have the ability to apportion the use of that patent(s) out as they will. The difference here is that the folks they are going after are making money "stealing" Phillips's technology, unlike a certain sixteen year old kid from Norway.

      I think the only thing stolen here is our freedom.
      Once a new market is found, these big corps. ,create some products (may be not the better they can, so they can earn more money from "improved" versions of the product maybe they have already in their drawer). These products are highly protected with patents. No one can enter their market without paying high fees. These are typical monopolistic practices that are becoming more and more common in the thechnologic area as the technology itself is becoming more and more complex so only fewer and fewer subjects can afford research and development.

    8. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not meaning to imply most people use it. I'm just saying that people who use DeCSS have already paid by purchasing the DVD-ROM drive. My assumption is that people using DeCSS to play DVDs they purchased aren't really costing anybody any money.

      Also as far as CSS goes, I believe that the members of DVD-CCA (I believe they control CSS) are for the most part the patent holders of DVD technology. I'm sure some of the patents these guys control are those that govern the implementation of CSS.

    9. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Let a politico's wife/kid/mom get busted for using a region-free DVD player or playing an "illegal" PS2 game. You won't need the revolution, the politico's will take care of the laws themselves.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    10. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Also as far as CSS goes, I believe that the members of DVD-CCA (I believe they control CSS) are for the most part the patent holders of DVD technology. I'm sure some of the patents these guys control are those that govern the implementation of CSS.

      I don't think that the specific implementation of CSS is patented, though I can't be sure. It's such a simple algorithm that I don't know if any of the concepts are really patentable. Certainly the code is copyrighted, and the "authorization" to decrypt CSS-scrambled DVDs comes as part of the license, so licensees don't need to worry about being sued under the DMCA or its ilk.

      I don't know who owns DVD-CCA, but I would be dumbfounded if the studios did not have a controlling interest. They're the ones who produce the media, they're the ones who pushed for CSS. It would be unbelievable if they didn't have control of the licensing, etc.

    11. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by mpe · · Score: 2

      I do live in the UK, and a bit over half of my DVDs are imported from the USA. Partly because of the cost, but mostly because I'm not prepared to wait for six months for them to release a film here, assuming they bother at all.

      Probably most DVD players sold throughout the EU are or can be altered to be region free. The irony is that Phillips isn't a US company, their head office is in Amsterdam.

      I don't know if it made it to slashdot - probably not - but a week or two ago there was a High Court judge over here who declared that playing an imported PS2 game infringed the copyright because it was licenced for another region and kept a temporary copy in memory. (I'm getting sick of this temporary copy rubbish - it's really a bit of a stretch).

      The "temporary copy" argument does appear to convince legal professionals. The world over, in the UK it actually made it into statute. In other parts of the world it is actual case law.

      Is it just me, or does anyone else find their respect for the law lessens every day? I'm going home shortly and will probably infringe copyright.

      The way the law is actually written it's virtually impossible not to infringe it. IIRC there is an interview with a law lord who more or less says this...

    12. Re:Ummm...we need to strike a balance here... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1
      If the DVD-ROM manufacturer paid a license fee to sell the drive, aren't they getting their money from DeCSS users? It has no application to this case, but only in regards to DeCSS. If the Phillips, etc. get their money from the drive manufacturer, and they get their money from the disc producer, why is it so important that they also get their money from the software producer?

      And I, like many people I'm sure, bought a drive with windows software and then ditched it to use in Linux. So they still get their software license.

  16. The problem with Philips, etc. by Herak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hmm... you know, if Philips, Sony, and Paramount didn't insist on having those stupid reigon lockouts, than this wouldn't be a problem.

    Other than that I think what's going on is perfectly fair, just that it's a little odd to be going after this at the customs level.

    1. Re:The problem with Philips, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair to the manfacturers, Region Lockout was a condition of the Content Houses, not the manafacturers....

    2. Re:The problem with Philips, etc. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      not really odd, it happens all the time.
      Some company thats is a country that does not have patents can't really be touched be Sony, whoever. So they tell the esports that these people are shipping some illegally, it goes into there database, and when the shiper sends them there data that says what there shipping, they just stamp reject, as it were. the real proble is that the ship may be allready on its way BEFORE the paper work is filed!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  17. Global new order by October_30th · · Score: 0
    This is exactly what globalisation dictated by corporations means: the little guy will always lose.

    Even governments aren't safe anymore. Just look how the president of a sovereign state was kidnapped, extradited and soon judged by an metanational court.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  18. Power to the consumer?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Look, I know these electronics compaines fronted the money to research DVD technology and they were it's main pioneers.. However as a consumer, I just don't give a damn, to put it bluntly. It's my dollar, I'll spend it how I choose. If I purchase a machine I'll perform whatever hacks or workarounds necessary to make it function the way I would like it to. That's just how it goes. If we just stop buying products from companies we don't care for, they'll get the message or they'll go away..

  19. $28/player by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just saw an article on Yahoo that stated that the patent royalties amount to $28 per player. That's over a third of the price for some units, and that's the retail price, not the wholesale price. It's no wonder that companies aren't paying up.

    It's just like with other intellectual property--when you price it too high, people will avoid paying.

    1. Re:$28/player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preston, you bitch.
      Your wife asks for fucking %55 just for a fucking blowjob yet people pay up ...
      Are you suggesting that if I think that this is too much then I have a right to rape her ?

    2. Re:$28/player by elandal · · Score: 2

      I'm always wondering about those cheap DVD players. I now checked some half a dozen stores in Finland, and the cheapest player I found was about 200€ - far more than the 150€+/-50 I've seen noted as "low-price" players by some.

      Anyway, of that 200€, $28 would be about 16%, not one third. And, the one person I know who wanted just a cheap player bought one for about 350€, which I consider pretty cheap.

      Mostly what I look for is Pioneer and Sony, which have models in the 350-600€ range - midprice players that look OK, play about anything, and have good warranties. And the most expensive player any of my friends has bought was 998£ (~1450€ at the time). That because he replaced his LD at the same time, buying a player that plays LD, DVD and CD formats.

      So, do I know people who'd think that the $28 (~32€) price difference matters? One.

      Think about it - it's the cost of one or two discs - depending on what You buy.

      And, of course You might sometimes wonder how come there were engineers and scientists not producing stuff but doing research. It's because the corps expect the R&D to be a money sink that produces IP that can be sold to consumers in the form of nifty stuff that does things nobody knew they needed before. The R&D has to be covered by royalties and such later.

    3. Re:$28/player by crow · · Score: 1

      Wow. Those are expensive players. Here in the US, you can get DVD players for under $100. Amazon has an Apex AD-1500 for $84.99. BestBuy.com lists a Mintek DVD palyer for $99.99.

    4. Re:$28/player by elandal · · Score: 2

      I've never seen Apex or Mintek for sale in Finland. And the cheapest one was YUKAI - if that means something to someone.

      Most are brand names like Pioneer, Philips, Sony, and the like. I think I've seen Onkyo, Samsung, Thomson, LG, JVC, Panasonic.. You get the picture.

    5. Re:$28/player by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Daewoo DVG-3000N is $95 (about 110) and is capable of outputting to an NTSC or PAL television set, you can also change the region setting. So while I've never used the player outside of region 1, it should be a perfectly capable set in Europe.

    6. Re:$28/player by elandal · · Score: 2

      Note: Amazon doesn't ship electronics and such to outside US.

      Nor do many other shops. Once I tried to find certain soundcard that was US only release, and found one or two places willing to ship to Europe, but only with a courier and insured. Meaning that the shipping would've cost more than the soundcard itself..

      You know, it's always so frustrating when I at last find something I want on the net, and notice that it's available only in the US, and no shop is willing to ship to Europe, or if one is, shipping would bleed me dry.

    7. Re:$28/player by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      When shopping for USA-only items, have you tried finding a seller on ebay who will ship to you?

    8. Re:$28/player by zero2k · · Score: 1

      If the Chinese mfrs cannot export to the US or Europe, just remember that they still have the Asian market, most of whom cannot afford to pay for expensive imports. This is a significant number, far exceeding exports to the western nations. If Philips and co are demanding such high royalties, I doubt that these manufacturers will pay up.

    9. Re:$28/player by elandal · · Score: 2

      Not on hardware unless it's dirt cheap. S&H from US to Finland is just plain insane except for ground (sea) shipments for anything that weighs something. And I don't like the idea of having electronics in a sea container for a week..

      And anime available on Ebay is mostly Taiwanese/Hong Kong stuff - bootlegs or with Chinese subs (perhaps legitimate)..

      So, it's always back to basics: no hardware from US unless I can ship via proxy: someone who lives there and is willing to receive a shipment, check that it's OK, repackage, and send using standard international air. Using private person as a proxy also helps when it comes to determining the value of an item at customs, as if I can reasonably explain the price of an item as used and so on, and save in import tax and VAT, the savings may shave enough off the S&H that it's worthwhile.

      And, with CD/DVD/LD/VHS/Books/etc - material that is not easily damaged, is pretty small, and doesn't really have moving parts, standard online stores work fine.

    10. Re:$28/player by slaida1 · · Score: 1
      Did Sony/Philips/Pioneer, whoever, invest so much to development, as to explain this premium on price? Have they disclosed those numbers somewhere as to show how much did it cost? Did they tell back then when these were invented how much the profit expectations were for these technologies? No?

      Why the hell not? Is it because they want as big profits as they can get? Of course. Why allow this relentless cashing and not set the target (profit expectation) beforehand so that other investors can decide at the beginning wich one of the new competing technologies is least expensive?

      I mean, isn't that how it works with private inventors, make something up and decide a price on it when selling the patent? Why allow per-unit license fees in the first place, isn't selling the patent (or shares of it) for some fixed price enough? Apparently not, and that's why we got many major PITAs all over the world, because "one can never have too much money! gimme more!".

      --
      Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  20. This should be a civil matter. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a civil dispute between the manufacturers and those who claim patent rights. Surely it should not be the business of customs to close down manufacturers of DVDs without some kind of civil decision in a court.

    Note that the customs officials have not only been asked to impound players thay are also impounding disks. The disks are not being impounded because the content is copyright, they are being impounded because the media is owned by these corporations.

    This is an outrage. It's like impounding books because someone claims they own the patent on the printing press. We need some protection against companies claiming to own and control the information medium in common use today.

    1. Re:This should be a civil matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you missed the part where they *do* own the medium. Knee-jerk moron.

    2. Re:This should be a civil matter. by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing / importing & selling of conterfeit products is a crime - that is exactly what is going on here.

      If philips wanted an IP war for the heck of it they'd try enforcing their trademark on the term VCR - but they don't.

    3. Re:This should be a civil matter. by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      This was moderated as insightful?

      Philips and others do own the patents for this technology. This is not in dispute. They do not just claim to own it, they, in fact, do own it.

      Customs is not being asked to close down manufacturers, they are being asked to impound players that violate the rights of the undisputed patent holders. If that hurts the manufacturers, too bad. Did you even read the article?

      The only outrage is that your post was modded up to 3.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    4. Re:This should be a civil matter. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      The point is these DVDs are impounded because of patent claims on the media, not copyright claims on the work it contains.

      You can happily march off into the chains of these people, but my analogy is entirely appropriate. These companies are crating an artificial monopoly on the media itself that is entirely different to copyright protections on content.

    5. Re:This should be a civil matter. by Performer+Guy · · Score: 2

      That's real intelligent. I know they claim to by virtue of patents you idiot, but then you're ananymous so you already make it clear you don't want to be associated with your own comments. You're the fool because you see no problem letting corporations confiscate publications and works of art because thay own the media and have an contrived monopoly over it.

    6. Re:This should be a civil matter. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Philips shill.

  21. I'm calling you out, Taco by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry. Not that I'm for region encoding or anything... But the "especially nice for anime junkies" parenthetical just doesn't ring true. Any anime DVDs released in the states will play on a Region 1 (?) DVD player. Any DVDs released in Japan... are going to only be in Japanese. So unless you went from just-discovering-anime-isn't-all-porn to fluent-in-Japanese in one year, the "anime junkie" you speak of sure as hell ain't you.

    On the other hand, I -do- know people who speak Japanese and appreciate imports. These are the same ones who modded their SNES to play imported Super Famicon games.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that I'm for region encoding or anything... But the "especially nice for anime junkies" parenthetical just doesn't ring true.

      It does for people who live in Region 2 countries.

      -Stephen

    2. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by jandrese · · Score: 2, Informative

      You forget about the increasing number of DVDs released in Japan (region 2) with English subtitles already included. Example: the last 5 FLCL DVDs.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by zuvembi · · Score: 2

      How can there be five FLCL DVD's? There were only six episodes in the series. Were they released one per disc? Have there been multiple releases? Am I wrong in how many FuriKuri episodes were made (if so , woohoo - time to find the rest for me!)

    4. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by thrig · · Score: 2

      Why yes, import anime DVD's generally do come with a Japanese language track. They also often come with several subtitle streams, English included. This allows one to watch shows that would never be ported over to the U.S., or works that certain American corporations are camping on.

      Do not speak Japanese, do appreciate imports, never owned a SNES. Loath the typical English dubs with a passion.

    5. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by forgoil · · Score: 2

      Ehm, wops. I think you just made a little misstake ^_^ But enough wisecracks (sp?). What people can do is to buy the original japanese DVD (which is usuall of pretty nice quality) and then when they play it they use homemade subtitles. I won't go into the techniques, the anime junkies knows it well enough and probably better than me. But unless I have missunderstood something, it is illegal to do a translation and then spread it.

      The Japanese production companies would without a question make a profit if they added English subtitles (but nothing more) and sold them region free, but that is another story.

    6. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by BlueNine · · Score: 1

      In Japan, the six episodes were released on one DVD each, but only the last five had english subtitles.

    7. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Loath the typical English dubs with a passion.

      I hate dubs too. Particularly the way their lips never synch up to the audio...

    8. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Il+Futurismo · · Score: 1

      I know some other helpful people got to this already, but here is a whole list of Region 2 Anime DVDs with English subtitles or dubbing. The Futurama Season one boxed set has also been released abroad, for those of you who don't appreciate animation that happens to be Japanese.

    9. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      And don't forget that lovely piece of software, DVD Subber. Not that it applies to set tops, but does, in fact, apply to DVD-ROMS, which are now adays hard-regioncoded. Although you can still follow along with a paper translation.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    10. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by elandal · · Score: 2

      We're talking about enforcement within Europe, which is region 2, not 1. And, there really aren't all that many anime releases in Europe, so the choices for a European anime collector are:
      1) Buy US releases and get a modded DVD player
      2) Buy Japanese releases (which are R2) and learn some Japanese while at it. Rest assured, after a couple of hundred titles You will recognize many phrases.
      3) Buy Taiwanese and Hong Kong releases. Mostly bootlegs, but cheap, regionless, and often with English subtitles. The quality is crap, though, both with video and translation. Perhaps the Cantonese subtitles are better translated, but I don't understand any dialect of Chinese.

      There are some Japanese releases with English subtitles. However, it takes some time to work out whether some release has English subtitles or not. And, Japanese releases are pretty much more expensive than US releases.

      So, most opt for modded player and US releases.

      However, I don't really care much about "unlicensed players". I'm pretty sure my Pioneer is fully licensed, and the fact that it just happens to have some repair shop ROM (used by technicians to fix the players and so on) in it is the reason I bought it. From a normal HiFi store. I heard they had some without this nifty ROM, but I've never heard of anyone who'd bought an unmodded player.

    11. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by sulli · · Score: 2

      Many anime fans, in the states, speak Japanese. So region coding is a problem.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    12. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Wow! Thanks for telling me! Because obviously I didn't know that, despite saying exactly that in my post.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    13. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every Studio Ghibli Region 2 DVD (4 or five films out so far) have English Subtitles. Furi-Kuri has English Subtitles on the Region 2 Discs. The list goes on and on.
      Maybe you need to get out more.

    14. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your point is entirely that Taco himself is unlikely to use a Japanese soundtrack with no subtitles, something he never claimed he would? (He said "anime junkies", not "all anime junkies" "anime junkies including me" or "anime junkies like me" - since the article is talking about _UK_ customs, it's unlikely to affect him personally).

    15. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pretty much.

      You see, CmdrTaco has had, in the past year or so, a tendency to over-exagerate his degree of "anime l33tness". He fashions himself an "anime junkie". From Taco's past behavior, it has come to the point where any reference to "anime junkies" does mean "anime junkies like me".

      And I'm mocking him for it.

      That's all. No deep message; nothing that deserves a (+1, insightful) mod. Just some light-hearted mockery of a guy who acts like he's deeply entrenched in fandom culture despite have just discovered it.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    16. Re:I'm calling you out, Taco by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      well many anime companies (adv being really notable in this regard) make their r1 disks playable in R1 R2 and R4 unless the Japanese licenser demands it to only be playable on R1 (and many don't). However it's not advertised on the box

  22. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    DVD players are dirt cheap already - at least here in California you can get one for $100.

    1. Re:Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if it costs you freedom ?

      The fact is, a DVD player which has been purposely borken so it doesn't play many types of DVDs (from other regions) is what is cheap. Not a "real" DVD player.

  23. Are regionless dvd players still possible by Wateshay · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if it would be possible to produce and sell a regionless dvd player while still licensing the necessary technologies, or do the require you to agree to implement region checking in order to give you the licenses?

    --

    "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    1. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by tboulay · · Score: 1

      http://www.avdeals.com/malatan996.htm

      http://www.avdeals.com/malatan900.htm

    2. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by rednuhter · · Score: 0

      Most DVD players sold in Europe (well the ones I have seen in the UK) are explicitly marked as Region 2 ONLY. and the manual refers to non Region 2 disks not playing at all.
      How ever, most, have a secret code that can be entered to unlock the regions and often disable macrovision. got my code from http://groups.google.com

      --
      ERR 411[Max number of witty sigs reached]
    3. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by dr_dank · · Score: 1
      Absolutely, and they're as close as your DVD drive.


      As far as your average dvd on a windows box is concerned, a little lurking in the registry will turn up the region code the drive is set for. Change this to whichever region you need.
      I can't say for sure on linux, since I haven't any out-region-discs anymore to play on by my linux box.

      Lets see Philips touch that.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      One thing that can be done is to mod certain players. There are companies out there that specialize in this and in some cases you can order a kit to mod your own player. This is player dependent of course, and as long as modding things like the PS2 is still legal in some places, these things will continue to be manufactured. BTW, the latest PS2 mods also remove region coding.

    5. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by notenoughnamespace · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything in the article about regionless players, just players breaching the patient.

      I have an LG player, which is fully licensed, patients all paid up, but it can still be made regionles with a few button presses on the remote control. As far as I could see the article had nothing to do with regions, just unlicensed players, but every other posting seems to be talking about regions, have I missed something?

    6. Re:Are regionless dvd players still possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That only works with RPC1 drives. RPC2 drives store the region in their firmware, and you can only change it 3 (or 5?) times. After that, the player is locked into the last region it had. You can download unofficial hacked firmware for some drives, to allow unlimited changes, but I don't know if there are any firmware update programs for Linux.

      I've heard that an invalid region will only prevent you from getting the title key, and you can still read the encrypted video. If this is true, you could brute-force the title key (it only takes a few seconds because of the horribly flawed encryption), and watch it anyway.

      Also, some hardware DVD players (i.e. the ones that hook up to your TV) contain regular IDE drives, and sometimes they are not region protected. You could put one of those into your computer and use that.

  24. Re:They're trying to send a message by damiangerous · · Score: 2

    Okay, I admit it, you got me in the beginning. But when you said "Macrovision is an unbreakable encryption system that keeps pirates from copying DVDs" you made me laugh, but I figured you just were a bit uninformed. But when you said "Most bootleg players run an embedded unix operating system" you gave it away entirely. It don't know if you were trolling, or just going for satirical, but damn, that was pretty funny.

  25. FYI: DVD Patent holders by cvd6262 · · Score: 1

    In order of number of patents held:

    Matsushita (Panasonic)
    Sony
    Pioneer
    Toshiba
    Philips
    Hitachi
    Thompson
    Others (Mitsubishi, JVC, TW/AOL)

    (From "DVD Demystified" by Jim Taylor)

    --

    I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

  26. Re:ispell by October_30th · · Score: 0
    Huh?

    Just how do you use ispell to spellcheck the text in the comment submission box? Cut-and-paste? Too much effort.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  27. Not an ispell problem/solution. by deacon · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "heals" is what a cut does after you put a band-aid on it.

    Ispell does not help you there.

    I hear that the problem here is firmly between the keyboard and the chair.

    However, only a heel would make fun of Taco's disability which sadly cannot be healed.

    There is no solution once we find that their teacher could not help them in their budding youth, they're forever doomed to confuse like-sounding words.

  28. goodbye progressive scan on PAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As a home theater enthousiast this means losing the ability to buy a nice player such as the Skyworth 1050p with Faroudja deinterlacer which outputs progressive scan on both PAL and NTSC, something the DVD forum forbids.

    Projector and HDTV owners love this feature to get rid of the nasty scan lines on their CRT equipment, without the need for buying an expensive external scaler.

    The problem with progressive scan is that they cannot easily apply macrovision to it, so you get a very clean signal without copy protection. As a result they have banned it for PAL.

    To my knowledge, there are no VCR's which accept a progressive RGB signal, so I cannot grasp why they are so paranoid when we can make perfect DVD copies on our PC's much more easily ?

    So far, from the three companies mentioned in the post we've only seen official progressive scan support on region 1 NTSC through component outputs.

    For the videophile, this is really BAD.

  29. They won't succeed... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They probably won't succeed in this.. Europe and the US don't want to start a trade war with the Asian countries that make these things, especially China. The movies companies love the way the waves of cheap DVD players that have sped the adoption of the format. Likewise, the big discount stores such as Walmart sell tons of them and don't want the price to go up. Finally the licensing costs are unrealistic, as high as $28, NYT

    Now that Enron is gone, does Microsoft's ownership share of President Bush increase?

    1. Re:They won't succeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now that Enron is gone, does Microsoft's ownership share of President Bush increase? "

      No, but your stupidity seem to be on the raise.
      Fucker.

    2. Re:They won't succeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trolls always post anon..

  30. A proper us of patents (for a change) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike many spurious IP patents, these patents cover actual investments in R&D and the time and capital spent in making it a usuable system. Were it not for these companies we wouldn't have DVD! All they are doing is excersising their legal right to make money from their own inventions.

    More power to them!

    Rich

  31. Interesting how patents get `pooled' by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've found it interesting how patents and other `intellectual property' tend to get pooled by a handful of major companies. This, my friends, is how standards really get made these days. Heck, similar practices date back a hundred years or more.

    This is really annoying to me, as these companies kind of turn the idea of a patent on it's back. Sure, they defend them from the man on the street til the cows come home, but then they collude with other big companies. Am I the only one that thinks this is backward?

    1. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      If one man has the tools, a second has the land, and a third has the seeds, then it only makes sense for them to put all three together, and feed themselves well. They can't be blamed for wanting to sell what they have at a somewhat reasonable price; they put in the work, after all.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      I think a better analogy would be a man who knows how to use tools, a man who knows how to clear land, and a man who knows how to plant seeds all collaborating so that they can sell us the food they make. And then making sure to knock any food out of our hands that may have been made by anyone else.

      There's a huge difference between physical tools and knowledge. These companies have pooled their knowledge of making products, not the tools used to make the products. Your analogy isn't very good.

    3. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by imadork · · Score: 2
      I've found it interesting how patents and other `intellectual property' tend to get pooled by a handful of major companies.... This is really annoying to me, as these companies kind of turn the idea of a patent on it's back.

      On the contrary, patent pooling can be just the thing to get a good technology into the mainstream.

      Even though this is slashdot, let's assume that Patents are a good thing, because it gives patent holders the right to make money for a limited time off of a truly novel invention (i.e. NOT one-click or hyperlinking) while the Public eventually gets the invention in the Public Domain when the patent expires. It's a stretch, I know, but bear with me.

      It just makes sense that if different companies are in the same business, they may obtain different patents on different aspects of a particular product. They're simply looking at different aspects of the problem at the same time. Without patent pooling, anyone that wanted to build that widget would have to negotiate with each patent holder individually. With patent pooling, you just fork over the money once, and the patent holders worry about how to divvy it up. This way, it becomes much easier for a technically-superior, non-free technology to become widely used. (Firewire/iLink/1394 is a good example, at least for DV camcorders).

      Of course, this only works then the patent holders come up with a reasonable formula for payment. Go back a few stories in the Queue to see what I mean.

    4. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by JJ22 · · Score: 1

      Beyond patent pooling there is patent selling and trading.

      We had a patent lawyer (specializing in emerging technology) give a short presentation in a class last year. In the QnA portion, he told us how if a lawsuit came up, it was his job to investigate the opposing company, find out what technologies they were using, and go out and buy patents from other companies so they could counter sue. Kind of like a game of war - each company would get 15-20 patents that they claimed the other was infringing on, and then used that leverage to avoid going to court.

      It was fascinating, but totally undermined my feelings for what patents were originally designed for.

    5. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      An even better analogy would be that they are removing the seeds of others from land they cleared themselves and stopping others from harvesting the seeds they (the original 3) planted.

    6. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You've pretty much nailed the problem in one sentence.

    7. Re:Interesting how patents get `pooled' by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You can't patent knowledge but you can patent tools.

      Philips and the others didn't just patent their idea for a DVD player. I can't patent the idea of an HDTV DVD player ('It should have lots of resolution and fit on a little disk and have freeze-frame. Thank you.'). I have to actually make one.

      The original analogy was just fine.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  32. Re:They're trying to send a message by morbid · · Score: 0

    And pray tell, how does the 16-bit nature of the Z80 addressing help when used with >5 GB (5*2^30) data?

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  33. Re:They're trying to send a message by HCase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree with you that Philips and the bunch have the patents, and that the manufacturers of cheap crappy dvd players should pay licenses. I disagree with some of the problems you've listed though as apparent reasons they should go after the manufacterers. The only real reason for it is because these groups do owe them money. for the rest: if they don't run native code and cause problems, thats something the customer should have to deal with for not paying money for a nicer player. macrovision prevents legal uses of dvd players and i would want it disabled on mine. i don't have a dvd player for all my entertainment equipment. say i want to watch the movie in my room, without moving to vhs, i can't. layer compatablity, the user has to deal with it, again, if they want it, they can pay the extra for it hackability is a good thing, it lets you watch the movie you want to even though it wasn't poorly enough done to have been made in here america.(or if your from another country maybe you just want to watch a garbage movie in order to laugh at us)

  34. Re:Anime is the last step before becoming a hermit by theNetImp · · Score: 0

    U don't watch much anime do you? Not all anime is fantasy based. Take Grave of the Fireflies. Which takes place towards the ending months of WWII. About a teenage boy who loses his mother in a bombing raid and therefor has to watch over his younger sister. It's extremely sad, and could have definately happened. Learn what you are talking about before you comment on it.

    -james

  35. Poetry... ./-style! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Adapted from Williams Carlos Williams' "Spring and All", 1923

    *Ahem*

    So much depends
    upon
    a silver media
    disc
    burned with anime
    movies
    inside the black
    box

    Thank You.
    In other words, for those of you less cultured, keep on hacking.

  36. Goddammit! by Kasreyn · · Score: 1, Troll

    This infuriates me. I'm an anime fan and was intending to get my hands on a regionless player eventually so I'd not be stuck with only US dubbed and subbed releases. I'm currently struggling financially and I can't afford luxury items like DVD's and players, though. So it looks like by the time I do get around to affording them, regionless players will be a thing of the past (I can imagine a conversation with a future child: "Daddy, what was 'Fair Use'?"). None of my friends or family have been able to find regionless players either - one of them got one that was advertised as regionless and it was in fact region 1. Where the hell do you find them??

    -Kasreyn

    --
    Kasreyn: Cheerfully playing the part of Devil's Advocate to hairtrigger /. flamers since 1999.
    1. Re:Goddammit! by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 1

      I got mine from a Canadian company (avdeals.com) without much trouble. However I've heard of several US companies selling them also. I have a Malata DVD-n996 and its a damn good region free player, with PAL to NTSC conversion.

    2. Re:Goddammit! by d0s · · Score: 1

      the antisocial network carries a whloe bunch of region-free and macrovision mods for different players. VCD Help also has more information on this, including a very informative list of modable and/or regin free dvd players.

  37. Re:They're trying to send a message by TrainedMonkey · · Score: 1

    One sentence: YOU HAVE NO IDEA OF WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.
    where do you get your facts? since when is Macrovision "unbrekable"? do a search for cracks to Macrovision protection in DVD in google and you will be surprised...
    hacking is bad? And it is earsier to hack becuase it uses some form of *nix? so using, let's say some form of other OS will make it "harder" to hack? how many things how you hacked lately? (BTW, some of the hacks for removing the Macrovision protection are implemented in OSes other than *nix).

    Try first THINKING before you post....

    --
    "I can't see a f#@!! thing" - photon a to crossing photon b
  38. Re:Anime is the last step before becoming a hermit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does he rape his sister with his 20TF tentacle after transforming into his secret deamon guise?

  39. Re:They're trying to send a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And it is earsier to hack becuase it uses some form of *nix? so using, let's say some form of other OS will make it "harder" to hack? "

    Yes it will you dumbfuck.
    How many people do you know who are familiar with some proprietary embedded OS as compared to technical peopel familiar with Unix ?
    Think before you post.

  40. Re:They're trying to send a message by rcw-work · · Score: 4, Informative
    Macrovision is an unbreakable encryption system

    Chuckle, cough, roll eyes.

  41. What's so special about this? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

    Every day on the streets of NYC, you see cops bust street vendors with fake Gucci and DK bags. The pirated video tapes, CDs. The've cracked down on people selling unauthorized FDNY hats. On a larger scale, they break up sweatshops that are pumping out fake Tommy jeans or Nautica jackets.

    So why's this news? Countefeiters exist in every market segment, and while they're small, they get away with it. Once they grow to a size where it begins to cut into the profits of the company, the company cracks down.

    European Customs officials are already hard at work keeping those fake Nike shoes and cheap Anne Klein knockoffs. It's just another thing they'll watch out for.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:What's so special about this? by radish · · Score: 2


      But it's not counterfeit moron - the DVD player does play DVD's, and it doesn't claim to be made by someone who it wasn't made by. Sure the company haven't paid the tax to Philips, but that does not make it counterfeit.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  42. Re:They're trying to send a message by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Macrovision is an unbreakable encryption system that keeps pirates from copying DVDs onto VHS tapes or video CDs.
    you either work for macrovision or are horribly mis-informed.

    macrovision is super easy to defeat. Little video stabilizer boxes have been available for over 15 years now that easily defeat it, remove it, and actually make the resulting video look better because the macrovision mess is removed.

    Macrovision is a joke, only macrovision is stupid enough to think that it works, and nobody takes it serious anymore. It's there to only annoy the guy wanting to make a VHS dub and doesnt have the noggin power to get around it.

    Remember Macrovision != copy protection and it is the easiest to break and remove.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  43. Re:They're trying to send a message by crumbz · · Score: 1

    Funny. Very funny.

  44. Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by 13Echo · · Score: 2

    I suppose that good things like APEX players couldn't last forever. APEX claims to be the second largest DVD player distributor in the U.S., next to Sony. The APEX product line, of course, is made by companies like Shinco of China. Shinco makes some great products, which include the DVD players that play Megadrive (Genesis) ROMs.

    I have an APEX player (ad 660)... Do you?

    1. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont know APEX, also known as the APEX company makes more than just APEX players, they mane APEX cd'roms, APEX dvd's, APEX toilet tissue all with APEX employees in APEX buildings, on APEX land. I'm sure the APEX shareholders will keep their APEX players so that APEX can keep making APEX equipment.

      This APEX brought to you by APEX.

      sheesh... why didnt you just go ....

      APEX,APEX,
      APEX,
      APEX, APEX,APEX, APEX, APEX, APEX, APEX, APEX,
      APEX, APEX,
      APEX, APEX, APEX, APEX,
      APEX, APEX, APEX, APEX, A P E X.

      heheheheheheeeeee...
      it would have ben easier to spot.

    2. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move your ass to China and enjoy your fucking Apex every fucking day of the year.
      After all, they do make "some great products".

      "I have an APEX player (ad 660)... Do you? "

      No, I have a brain.

    3. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by d0s · · Score: 1

      I have an AD-500w in the living room, and a 703 in my bedroom. Best. DVD. Players. Ever. MP3 support is nice, too.

    4. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Bleah.... I sold my 600a recently, because it's inferior in a number of ways. Sure, the secret menu in the BIOS was way cool, but it can't output Dolby Surround component audio, which I need for my "Surround ready" receiver that doesn't do internal decoding of the signal.

      The Apex also choked on a number of commercial DVD titles, due to bugs in their firmware. The MP3 player freaked out on some of my MP3 songs I burned to CDR that used a variable bit-rate. (They'd start playing at the wrong speed, and sounded like the Chipmunks.)

    5. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by Abwh · · Score: 1

      -You can get new firmware that corrects said bugs.
      -You can get surround out, is in the Speakers Setup sub-menu
      -MP3, ok, some research woud have helped you. It works flawlessly as long as the minimum bitrate is 64kbps (lame -v 1 -b 64 -F).

      I use it for region 1,2 and 4 discs with no problem. Did I mention it does Pal-NTSC conversion in the player too???

      --
      Gerry -- #include "ea!.h"
    6. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, I have a brain"

      I can tell by the way you overpay for a DVD player that restricts your rights to watch DVDs from other parts of the world.

      Do you go to school to become that clever, or were your born that way?

    7. Re:Alas, poor APEX, I knew you well... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Huh? Last I checked, any newer firmware revisions for the Apex 600a also removed the secret menu, and all of the cool functionality (like region changing and macrovision removal) which made it valuable to begin with.

      The fact that you can get "surround out" does me no good. What I need is component audio outputs on the back. (6 independent RCA jacks; 2 for front speakers, 2 for rear speakers, 1 for center channel, and one for subwoofer)

      The Samsung DVD-812 I bought as a replacement has this, and feels like a better quality player to boot. Best of all, it costs me less (new in opened box on eBay) than what I sold the 600a for.

      Granted, I miss MP3 playing capabilities a little bit, but I'd rather just play them from my PC anyway (or burn the best songs to audio CDRs).

  45. NOTE TO EDITOR by BlkPanther · · Score: 1

    Its not 'heals' its 'heels'. You know the saying 'on the heels of ...'. We're talking about the body part not something a doctor does.

    BlkPanther

    --


    I find that most often I end up learning from necessity, rather than for enjoyment.
    1. Re:NOTE TO EDITOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, but don't you know? This is a "professional" establishment, therefore why would they need to proofread their stories?

  46. Artificial Restrictions by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No one understands the truth behind DVDs outside slashdot and a few other groups. As far as the general public is concerned, DVDs are god, and the best thing since sliced bread. If you try to explain to them that DVD is just a method for large corporations to control you, what you own, and what you have the right to do then they give you a dirty look.

    The people need to be educated about region encoding, macrovision and the fact that the producer can even control your fast-forward button. I object to any system that implements an artificial limitation on hardware that you own. If its in my house, then i have access to the circuitry, thus i can make it do what i like - ok so its very hard to mod a player, but its technically possible, therefore the manufacturer shouldn't bother putting in the restrictions in the first place.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Artificial Restrictions by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, most people don't want to be educated about complex issues. The reason rights erode is because the average sheeple doesn't care and doesn't want to care.

      Cynical? Not really; I'm being realistic based on years of experience in activism. People only care about issues that directly affect them; it is very difficult to get people interested in anything that might inconvenience them. People watch DvDs, but don't exercise their rights to free speech -- so guess which one they care about more?

    2. Re:Artificial Restrictions by ajaygautam · · Score: 0

      One such educational site would be: http://www.opendvd.org/

      --
      http://www.ajaygautam.com
    3. Re:Artificial Restrictions by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      Excuse me but I am old enough to remember when you couldn't watch movies in your house unless they were airing on TV. What color is the sky in your world where the ability to watch an uncut feature film in the privacy of your home with director commentary and optional subtitles is a right? Must be a pretty color.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    4. Re:Artificial Restrictions by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Just what my point is - your so impressed by the features of DVD (which lets face it, aren't that amazing, or difficult to develop) that you forget about the restrictions.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    5. Re:Artificial Restrictions by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      The restrictions on a DVD are nothing compared to the restriction of only being able to see a movie when TV networks air them. I know what the restrictions are and the freedoms (being able to watch a movie whenever I want as many times as I want as loud as I want) far outweigh them, IMHO.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    6. Re:Artificial Restrictions by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 1
      Cynical? Not really; I'm being realistic based on years of experience in activism.
      But that is cynicism :-)

      Crispin
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase

  47. Re:They're trying to send a message by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    I better remeber to run my IPCHAINS, or my DVD player might get hax0r3d.

  48. What about European anime junkies? by bouvin · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is my impression that the demand for region free DVD players is relatively limited in the states, certainly compared to Europe. Region 1 (North America) has the largest DVD selection, and thus the need (for the general public) to import DVDs is limited. Furthermore, most American TV sets would have difficulties showing PAL (the European TV standard).

    Europe is region 1 (together with Japan, and as others have noted, an increasing number of Japanese DVD releases feature English subtitles), and while the DVD market is rapidly growing, we have still a long way to go, before matching the selection found in region 1, especially wrt. special genres, such as anime.

    Luckily, region free DVD players are readily available in stores. These are however usually not Apex etc. players, but modified brand players. I personally own a region free Pioneer DVD player, which handles all regions beautifully. A further advantage is that most European TV sets are able to handle NTSC. There is nothing shady about these modifications - most stores will perform them, and many places do not even sell non modified players (in Denmark, that is).

    From my perspective, the only attractive feature of the Apex etc. players is that they often handles (XS)VCDs better than ordinary DVD players. As (XS)VCDs never were an item here in Europe, this is not really much of a problem, unless you burn your own.

    --
    --- In omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
    1. Re:What about European anime junkies? by elandal · · Score: 2

      Actually, even Pioneer DV-535 plays VCD and SVCD. Except for multiple audio tracks and soft subs on SVCD - a shame. I think it should play X(S)VCD, too, but haven't checked. If it handled XSVCD with soft subs, I might be more interested.

      And for more information about players and their capabilities, check out VCD Help DVD Player comparison chart.

  49. Temporary RAM copies by dachshund · · Score: 2
    I'm getting sick of this temporary copy rubbish - it's really a bit of a stretch

    Yes, I find it amusing that courts are willing to gloss over the technical details and stretch common-sense "real world analogy" reasoning to some aspects of copyright law (eg, linking and framing a copyrighted image that resides on somebody else's public web server constitutes a violation, because it looks like you've displayed the image yourself) while at the same time resorting to the gritty technical details for other aspects (temporary RAM copies, etc.)

  50. Oh, and another thing... by 13Echo · · Score: 1

    Macrovision isn't encryption, it's a simple analog circuit.

    Oh, and yet another thing...

    My APEX player plays any disk just fine, without a hitch. The first generation of 600a models had some problems, but were fixed with a firmware revisions. For the record, almost all licensed manufacturers had the same problems at one time, especially with multi-layer disks.

    Get a fskin' clue.

  51. Re:They're trying to send a message by m4g02 · · Score: 1

    This is a Troll, not links, no real info, just a buch of words all joined that looks like a good post.

    Anyway, you can always buy a good video capture card for your PC and save a DVD video directly to DivX on your PC, so no real protection at all.

    --
    Sigs are for morons... Wait a minute...
  52. General response: I was only talking about Taco! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

    It does for people who live in Region 2 countries.

    I understand that. Obviously I wasn't clear in my post that the US-centricism of the post came solely from the fact that I was responding to a comment made by the Taco-meister. But I was. Even just in the US I was admitting that my statement wasn't universally valid. It only applies to Taco. Of course I appreciate imports, and thus loathe region restrictions! If it wasn't for the imported laserdisc, I never would have gotten my fansubbed Nausicaa!

    CmdrTaco lives in Michigan. I myself hail from the same place, so I can be pretty sure that it's not Region 2. And I can be reasonably sure he doesn't speak Japanese. I doubt he's using any dubbing programs to add subtitles to laserdiscs. In fact, I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't even get the imports of those titles that -do- have English subtitles. I was mocking Taco's self-appointed title of "anime junkie", and implication that he, too, suffers from region restrictions and their affect on his "addiction". That's all. Lighten up.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  53. Re:They're trying to send a message by me0 · · Score: 0

    Also...
    As a poor patentholder you have no chance to make money as the big fish will only wait you out until you cannot prolongue your patent cause you're broke. Legal or illegal is just a wording with regard to some obscure patent law which wont protect you unless you have the money. I say down with patents. The whole world seem to believe that the only way business can be made is through screwing everyone everywhere. Everybody should use open standards and concentrate on making a better product instead. Obviously it's way too hard to make a good product instead of suing to the left and right.

    God damn corporate miffos!

  54. I would stay away from the el cheapo players by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    I worked at a video store briefly and we had people come in all time saying "This DVD is broke. It won't play in my dvd player." I always would ask what kind of player they had, and it was APEX or ORITRON. Sure enough the DVD was fine but it was dual-layer. It seems like many of the major studio new releases are. The store was in a lower-middle class part of town where the Wal-Mart was very popular so it was no surprise. I kind of felt sorry for those people who spent their hard earned $88 on those things. The most ironic thing is that the district manager had a raffle for a free DVD player, and guess what ... it was a piece of crap, ORITRON. The winners came back a week later and said that many discs didn't work and yep, they were dual-layer. When I finally decided to get one, I got a moderately expensive JVC.

  55. Re:They're trying to send a message by hrieke · · Score: 1

    Read the rest of the message... *sigh* It was humor!!!!

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
  56. Re:General response: I was only talking about Taco by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry... I must have missed the portion of Taco's blurb where it says "I AM AN ANIME JUNKIE!" Oh wait, that's right, it doesn't. All it says is that it's nice for anime junkies, wherever they might live.

    Jeez, hate the guy if you must, but at least be rational about it.

    --

    "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

  57. Re:They're trying to send a message by TrainedMonkey · · Score: 1

    Making a system proprietary does not make it more secure (i.e. free from hacking). You do not need tons of people to hack a system. In fact you need just one person: later he distributes his hack and the ball starts rolling.
    No "embedded OS" is safe when confronted with the rigth tools, and someone with MOTIVATION...

    --
    "I can't see a f#@!! thing" - photon a to crossing photon b
  58. R2 Anime DVDs & English Options by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, all the Region 2 native Japanese discs that have been released so far of Hayao Miyazaki's anime also include the English dub and English subtitles (though they're actually "dubtitles," i.e. captions for the English dub--and, in the case of Kiki's Delivery Service, they're dubtitles for the Streamline dub, which isn't even on the disc!).

    A lot of anime which have English dubs, such as Giant Robo, include them on the DVD sets as a matter of course, just because, hey, they have the room, and the Japanese seem to think English is "kewl". (Which would also explain why they commissioned Macek to dub and then Japanese subtitle Macross: Love Do You Remember and Megazone 23 Part II--you can still find copies of those subtitled dubs floating around fansub trading circles to this day--and why the Armitage: Polymatrix movie was done only in English, with Japanese subtitles for the folks at home.) Some companies have even started including genuine English subtitles on their discs, though the names of the series escape me (I want to say Gunbuster, though I can't remember specifically).

    That being said, gaijin fans have been importing anime from Japan ever since the days of the laserdisc, which didn't even have a capacity for subtitles. After all, if you're going to do a fansub, you want crystal-clear originals--and hey, DVD is even better than laserdisc. There's even a program out there for Windows that lets people view their unsubtitled DVDs in conjunction with downloaded fansub scripts (though it didn't work very well for me when I tried it). And when it comes right down to it, people watched anime in straight Japanese with synopses, scripts, or best guesses for years before fansubbing was even possible.

    So claiming that all-region DVD players are not a boon to anime fans because Japanese discs don't have English is a bit misinformed or downright disingenuous. Better do some more research next time.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:R2 Anime DVDs & English Options by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      So claiming that all-region DVD players are not a boon to anime fans because Japanese discs don't have English is a bit misinformed or downright disingenuous.

      Well, I avoid your accusation of disingeniosity because I didn't claim all-region DVD players are not a boon to anime fans.

      And sure, I wasn't aware of the number of Japanese-released DVD's with english, but I'm hardly going to feel bad about not doing research in order to mock CmdrTaco. It's not like I was ranting about fandom in general!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:R2 Anime DVDs & English Options by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      Um, LDs can hold subtitles in the form of closed captions, BUT, the Japanese didn't use such a system. A good share of my US-made bilingual anime LDs used closed captions for subtitles.

      Also there are a few players and LDs that supported an LD-G standard for removable / selectable subtitles. Needless to say, the LD format died before it could have been implemented in the US.

    3. Re:R2 Anime DVDs & English Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that GR only had the crappy English dub -- not subtitles. For that reason, I picked up the pirate 3-disc set from Hong Kong....

      Which has subtitles theoretically, but they were apparently done by the guy who translated Wing Zero. Before he knew as much English as when he did Wing Zero.

      Good series though... can't wait to see Metropolis, for yet more retro-anime.

  59. Re:General response: I was only talking about Taco by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    No, but you obviously missed all the previous Taco blurbs where he did say that. When exactly did it become irrational to use someone's past when interpreting their present? Oh right, it didn't.

    And I don't hate him, I'm just mocking him. :)

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  60. hackable holy grail? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Interesting



    My current understanding of the 'hackable' DVD market indicates that the Daewoo 5700 is the current holy grail model.

    http://www.dvd-wizards.com/darrenk/Daewoo_DVD5700/ DVD-5700patch.htm

    Disable region encoding; diable macrovision; NTSC/PAL/RSC format supported; mp3 supported; component out. Only thing this is missing is progressive scan.
    There is a good reason for these players, however. They are clearly easier to manufacture, resulting in a cost savings for the consumer. Instead of maintaining 5 separate product lines with different hardware configurations, there is a single line with a flashable BIOS at the end for each region. So Daewoo isn't courting the after-market hackers, but rather just being a good manufacteurer.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:hackable holy grail? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      I'd probably place $50 that Daewoo players are POS, regardless of whether their firmware can be swapped around.

      Incidentally, most Philips DVD players can be hacked using a certain aftermarket universal remote. No firmware swaps. No CD-R burns. You don't even open the case!

      The problem is that Philip's DVD players are pretty substandard in quality, their newest flagship, the Q50, was shipped with fundementally flawed firmware.

    2. Re:hackable holy grail? by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Daewoo generaly makes decent products, so I'm sure the quality of the player is decent as well.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  61. Read the article next time. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the low-cost players come from factories in China. International trade newsletter TV Digest estimates China produces around 10 million DVD decks a year, mainly for export. European and North American importers then slap on Western brand name labels and sell them for under $100. Sounds like counterfeiting to me.

    --
    -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    1. Re:Read the article next time. by radish · · Score: 2

      Not convinced. You don't see Sony/Philips whoever suing for counterfeiting. What you do see is stacks of cheap players with brands you've never heard of, often with western sounding names. Could that be what they mean? Don't know. But I've never heard of fake brand name electronics.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Read the article next time. by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2

      Just because you are unconvinced or never heard of something does not make ME a moron.

      You can't sue a company in China. The only thing you can do is to crack down on the smuggling.

      Here's a breakdown of what the US Customs seized in the first half of 2001. Note this is only what it seized; who knows how much actually gets through. US Customs Seizures. In the 2000 figures you see Consumer Electronics at 3%. Not much, but yes, it does exist.

      As for what Philips is doing; in India, they conducted 27 raids in 19 months on factories making counterfeit products story.

      From the Aussie ZDNet, a story about a huge shipment of counterfeit Nokia phones. story.

      Doing a google search about China and counterfeiting and you find mostly software and playstation game piracy stories. But you can find stories about counterfeit consumer electronics if you look.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:Read the article next time. by radish · · Score: 1

      OK I stand corrected, I apologise, I was having a bad day.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Read the article next time. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      They're not cracking down on rebranded players, they're cracking down on unlicensed players -- there's a difference.

      Lots of DVD players are made that don't have a license from the appropriate parties to do CSS, etc. but do it anyway. Its basically a patent infringement issue, not a copyright / piracy issue.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  62. Memo to Armchair Detectives by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 1
    It speaks volumes about our society when we focus so much energy and resources on less important things (eg. stopping a guy going 5 over the speed limit) while neglecting more important things (eg. solving a rape case).

    But the two go hand-in-hand. New York City saw a remarkable drop in violent crime because of increased enforcement of "quality of life" crimes.

    It may seem trivial to bust kids jumping subway turnstiles, but low-grade collars allow the police to hold someone and run checks for outstanding warrants and desk appearance tickets. Often this leads to an arrest for a more serious charge.

    Now, this same technique can be abused, but used correctly it gives the cops an opportunity to get "up close and personal" with people who might otherwise be at liberty to commit more crimes.

    --

    Java is the blue pill
    Choose the red pill
  63. Foreign Films by trance · · Score: 0

    My problem isn't with viewing Anime, but with many other Foreign films (namely French or from Hong Kong) that are often already translated with Subtittles in the films. Many of these movies are great (plot/action wise) but because of a lack of interest in most foreign films in the U.S., very rarely do they have domestic DVD distribution. I was actually looking at All-Region playing Players this morning.

    --
    Art is not a mirror, art is a hammer.
  64. Re:A proper us of patents (for a change)-NOT! by justin+sane · · Score: 1

    The real reason it seesm Phillips is going after them is that they are making region-independent DVD players which doesn't hurt Phillips patents but the Motion Picture Industry cartel's efforts to shackle users fari use. Yet another use of the IP infrastructure to squeeze money from consuemr--not by adding value but by limiting choice. Greedy drones.

  65. China's got some problems with counterfeiting by PowerTroll+5000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please knock it off. I work in the electronics parts industry (Controller of Corp.) and know what I'm talking about. This has been a major problem for years now.

    EBN Online has many, many articles on this subject.

    Here is a sample. Use their search engine, and you'll find others.

    Try The ERAI website for checking the effects this problem has on our industry. It's costing us millions, if not billions.

    Before you open up your mouth and spew your "humanitarian" garbage, check facts first.

    --

    I'm not afraid of falling, it's the sudden stop at the end that frightens me.

    1. Re:China's got some problems with counterfeiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I support china's efforts at producing electronics. They produce stuff people actually want and they make it cheap.

      Only $80 for a DVD player and no macrovision.

      That's worth it. I can afford to buy one every year and still be ahead.

      Oh yea, did I mention no macrovision?

      You and your whining make me laugh. The chinese have price and convencience on their side. You have a lot of whining that makes us all laugh at you.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha hah aha

  66. Re:They're trying to send a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you. As has been stated repeatedly, one has a legal right to make personal copies of any media one purchases to any other form of media one owns for their own use, so the lack of Macrovision is a PLUS to the enduser. Similarly, most of the Z-80 junk is to enforce 'unskippable ads' and other garbage I didn't ask for nor want in a DVD player.

  67. New Pledge by mrseth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think in 20 or so years school children will be reciting this:

    I pledge allegiance to flag of the Incorporated States America, and to the Profit for which it stands, one Corporation under God, indivisible, with avarice and AOL for all.

  68. Re: relative quality by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    It's not so much a change in attitude favoring "cheapness over quality".

    Instead, it's more of a societal interest in having whatever is the latest and greatest. High-tech electronics go from "cutting edge" to "old tech" in just a few years. Why bother engineering a DVD player to last 30 years when 99.9% of the customers will be using something completely different in half that time?

    By contrast, the phonograph record was in use for over 70 years before anything really began to render it obsolete. (Sure, you had "open reel" tape, 8-track tape, and then cassette tape - but people were still buying and using records throughout all of these technologies.)

  69. Might be ok, might not by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    IF it is possible to get a patent license from Phillips with reasonable terms (e.g. a license that does not include DVDCCA terms, such as the player must not have firewire out, must have additional circuitry to support Macrovision, etc) then there's no problem with this.

    But IF Phillips is only licensing their stuff to people who get a DVDCCA license, then that's product tying, corrupt, etc. and I don't want my tax money being used to have customs enforce an illegal policy.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  70. Re:General response: I was only talking about Taco by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    well considering Taco was constantly promoting animefu for a while, i'd say its pretty safe to say he is an anime junkie.

    that and the fact he is usually the one who posts the anime stories to the mainpage

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  71. Re:They're trying to send a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Macrovision is an unbreakable encryption system that keeps pirates from copying DVDs."

    You don't get out much do you?
    People have been ripping DVD's for years.

  72. Re:They're trying to send a message by Wanderer1 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps one should be more concerned with protecting the trademark of the DVD logo than the manufacturing of the hardware.

    Assuming the trademark is protected, then a consumer can be certain a logo'ed machine is manufactured to compatible specifications.

    Back in the old IBM XT/AT days, many different computer vendors built machines compatible with the IBM spec but without IBM parts. It should be no different for a vendor to manufacture a DVD player using generic parts that don't conform to the original design specifications, if that vendor can successfully sell a machine that does the job.

  73. Re:They're trying to send a message by RickHunter · · Score: 2

    I wonder how much dfeldman got paid by the MPAA to make THAT comment? ;)

  74. copying DVDs by Sara+Chan · · Score: 1
    This is a bit off-topic, but ...
    I just found this advertisement for software that, they claim, can turn any CD burner into a DVD burner. If true, it would make copying DVDs a lot easier and cheaper.

    Does this make sense? And does anyone know anything about the product?

    If this is true, then Houston, we have a problem.

    1. Re:copying DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your a dope. Is this realy a post or some bantant troll bait. Basically all this is is VCD. Look it up. Go to www.vcdhelp.com . You rip the DVD with your computer. Convert the file to Mpeg-1 then burn it to CD. Ie VCD. really easy once you understand it. Mostly freeware stuff.

    2. Re:copying DVDs by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      No, it doesn't make sense. It's probably Divx.

      It's just a scam.

      There is NO WAY IN HELL that SOFTWARE can turn a cdrecorder which does 650 - 700M into a 5G DVD recorder.

      If you want to do divx, software is free anyway
      (at least on Linux, I don't use Windows..)

    3. Re:copying DVDs by Abwh · · Score: 1

      Most probably is a ripper with VCD format ouput.

      --
      Gerry -- #include "ea!.h"
    4. Re:copying DVDs by mikewas · · Score: 1

      A friend got it, thinks it's great.

      He says it copies the DVD & saves it to a CDROM in compressed format. Playback is on a PC. Resultent quality is "inferior but quite acceptable".

      I haven't seen it. He didn't know what format was used -- his technical knowledge & proclivities lie elswhere.

      Personally, I'll stick to DVDs.

      --

      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  75. Unlicensed DVD Playaz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  76. Re:They're trying to send a message by deblau · · Score: 1
    I agree that defending rights of corps to enforce IP rights here is probably futile, but I'll back you up when you say they should. This is absolutely correct. That's the law, and they're entitled. Of course, laws can be changed (bought).

    I disagree that Philips loses money to infringing companies. It would be more correct to say that they do not /get money/ from these companies. If it's not money already in your pocket, you can't really lose it, can you? You simply aren't collecting money you are due. Same argument as to why copying isn't stealing, really.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  77. Mintek for 60 bucks around christmas by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    In the US, the large electronics chain, "best buy" had a special in which they were selling players by mintek for 60 bucks back around thanksgiving/christmas. i'm not sure if they were eating part of the cost or not, but if best buy wasn't that 28 dollar licensing fee is half the retail cost of the player!

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  78. Seems fair by terrymr · · Score: 1

    Bear in mind this is not some kind of movie industry policing operation but merely an attempt by an inventor of a piece of technology to get paid by other manufacturers of that hardware.

    This is the most blatent kind of infringement you could think of - on a par with trying to pass off your copied CD's as originals in a store.

  79. You'll get my unlicensed DVD player by palmer · · Score: 1

    when you pry from my cold, dead, hands!

  80. Its over the DVD emblem by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    If they don't have a DVD emblem on the front they don't have to be 100% complient with Philips.

    1. Re:Its over the DVD emblem by Grab · · Score: 2

      Maybe so, but if it plays DVDs then they're violating Philips' patents. Just bcos it doesn't blatantly say on the box "this is a DVD player which uses Philips' patents" doesn't mean that it doesn't!

      Grab.

  81. Missed point. by Kalgart · · Score: 1

    In reading through the comets it appears many are of the belif that the actions philips are taking is a restriction on multi-region and non-region players.

    From my experence in replacing a stolen DVD player, The liscenced manufacturers are producing players that don't follow the region restrictions. This might be the market that I am buying in - New Zealand, But I doubt that special versions would be produced for such a small market.

    So what it leaves is companys that are producing products without liscencing the techonology they use from the patent owners. This is entirely consistant with philips' position on Non Red-Book CDDA disks - Unliscenced use of their IP and patents.

    Then again, this is only my opinion.

    Kal

  82. Re: relative quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the phonograph record was in use for over 70 years before anything really began to render it obsolete."

    Plenty of people would disagree that the LP is obsolete. According to RIAA figures, vinyl sales were US$54 million in 2000 with 2.2 million LP/EP sales and 4.8 million in singles sales. From what I hear, vinyl is also more popular in European markets than North America.

    Anyway, a good turntable can be as or more sensitive to adjustment as an optical system -- VTA, azimuth, speed stability, anti-skate force, tracking force, cartrige alignment with grooves, and more can have an effect on what you hear, sometimes with changes of as little of 1 arc minute or less in alignment...

  83. Security through obscurity by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    If a company uses an propietry custom built in house developed embedded OS that the 'hacker community' has had fuckall experiance with, while no tools or compilers are publically avaliable for it, I'd say odds on, with everything else being equall, it would be more secure than otherwise.

  84. Re:They're trying to send a message by Don+Negro · · Score: 2

    The Z-80 bit was what broke my suspension of disbelief. Then it got funny real quick.

    --

    Don Negro
    Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall

  85. I didn't think about that hard enough... by joshamania · · Score: 2

    I guess the money from Phillips's patent and royalties paid to the DVD-CCA would be separate (though Phillips is prolly part of the DVD-CCA and would see some of that too).

    Interesting though how the DVD-CCA is not going after these folks, too, as it's obviously a violation of the DMCA(as they would have you read it...)...or are the rip-off player manufacturers paying the DVD-CCA and not Phillips? That doesn't sound right to me...

  86. Re:They're trying to send a message by Mirus+Nex · · Score: 1

    Actually, that's a very loose analogy... Copying a DVD/CD/CD-ROM/tape/etc... for the sake of making yourself a copy that you normally wouldn't buy is quite a bit different than making copies to sell. Sure, if you wouldn't buy it because it's too expensive, or very hard to get, or you just don't like the manufacturer then they aren't, technically, "losing" money on your copy. But, if you turn around and sell 100 copies on the street then they are losing money. Since these $100 players are being sold consumers are spending money to buy DVD players. That money is going to China, or wherever, and not to the holders of the patents. If, for example, APEX sold 1000 DVD players at $100 and Philips sold 100 DVD players at $120 how much money did Phillips make (12,000 Gross)? If APEX actually paid a license for DVD for say $20 per player now how much money does Philips make (12,000 + 20,000 = 32,000)? APEX is, in effect, stealing $20,000 from Philips. And Philips has lost $20,000...

  87. Re:They're trying to send a message by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    What's more, these players often have serious compatibility problems which cause headaches for users and content providers alike

    "Compatibility problems"? The bootleg DVDs aren't the ones with the compatibility problems. They play 90% of the DVDs on the planet, instead of just DVDs that are marked for the same region as the player, which limits most DVD players to one sixth, if not less, of all of the DVDs on Earth. THAT'S a compatibility problem.

  88. What constitues "unlicensed"? by Jason0x21 · · Score: 1

    So, if a computer DVD drive might be used to play DVDs with an unlicensed program, can they stop it at the border?

    Are we only shipping pre-installed windows boxes again?

    This just gives me one more reason to set up a Linux DVD player; then again, I don't have any DVDs because of all this nonsense.

    1. Re:What constitues "unlicensed"? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      region encoding is built into the hardware these days, so it doesn't matter what OS your using.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What constitues "unlicensed"? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2

      No, it's not.

      it's hardcoded in the units FIRMWARE wich is SOFTWARE. it can be changed by either reflashing the firmware or replacing a chip. mostly the same thing ppl do with DVD players that needs an "internal surgery" with a soldering iron to become region free.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
  89. region by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Hey, maybe everyone in the world should ONLY buy region 1 dvd player.
    sure, there owuld be a period where some things would be hard to get, but a very short period.
    consider:
    1)Region 1 gets most titles all ready.
    2)The movie industry would drop a brick when they could sell the non region one movies.
    3)pretty soon region one would be just as good as regionless, since all titles would be released that way.

    Off the top of my head, I figure it would take a year befor everyone was producing only region 1 dvd's

    Its hard, but it would work.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1) What would they do with the non-region 1 DVDs they already own?


      2) What's the chance of DVDs being released as region 1?


      3) I assume all the Region 1 DVD players have NTSC output. Problem is, most of the non-US televisions have PAL input.


      4) Likewise, I suspect most of the Region 1 players only work with US power standard (60 cycle, 120 volt) . To say nothing of the half-dozen standards for plugs and sockets in the world!

    2. Re:region by mpe · · Score: 2

      Region 1 gets most titles all ready.

      When it comes to films. With things such as US produced television programmes things appear to work differently.

  90. Re:They're trying to send a message by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    You basically have 3 points.

    1) Philips loses $ on lost licensing fees.

    Yes prolly true

    2) Unlicensed players are likely not to handle instructions/layered disks etc properly.

    Well, NO. They can produce a player but they forget to implement the instruction set? Unlikely.

    They can't play layered disks? Maybe. But same with some licensed ones.

    Plus, they can play from any region, a plus to users' experiences. (esp frequent travellers)

    3) Content protection.

    Really, should players be implementing protection?

    I mean, should I have a text file with all my passwords and insist people only read it with my super secure program instead of notepad?

    All that aside, how would piracy skyrocket? People pirate DVDs. When did you last see a pirate copying DVDs onto VHS and selling them?

    Pirate DVDs are PRESSED in factories in China or wherever, and are unrelated to players being licensed.

  91. Philips DVD players aint so secure neither by ilsie · · Score: 1

    This is hilarious, because I've had a Philips DVD711 for about the past year and a half. For about the past year and four months, it's been region/code free, done completely without ever even opening up the dang thing.

    Check out this site to see how you can make your Philips DVD player region free.

  92. HEELS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heels damnit!

  93. Re:They're trying to send a message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Most DVD players support a modified version of the Z-80 instruction...
    Not in the standard, never seen anything about this. Menus are done using a scripting system.

    Macrovision in not an encryption scheme but a signal perturbation causing old vcr's to incorrectly balance brightness while recording
    (maybe you are talking about CSS, which is the dvd encryption scheme but is far from unbreakable)

    Bootleg players doesn't run unix ore anything like that... would be too expensive to include huge roms to contain unix (and multitaking is not really needed for dvd)

    All those reasons are bad/incorrect reasons.

    My point of view is those dvd players were a blessing for dvd industry when the whole standard started it's rise: licenced DVD's were very twice or three time the price making the whole thing unaffordable for most people: only rich enthusiasts would have bought DVD players and DVD sales would have been catastrophic (and phillips whould not have made so much money from the discs sales).
    I completely agree it's unfair competition against "legal" manufacturers and those manufacturers should be the first to sue the counterfeit dvd readers manufacturers.

    Counterfeit hardware/software is bad for business and competitivity. The whole problem is to put the right limit between counterfeit and legit (but often IP owners are exaggerating)

  94. Real Anime Junkies in Europe by Bartmoss · · Score: 1

    Real anime junkies don't need RC free players in Europe, because Japan and Europe are both RC2 afaik.

  95. Re: relative quality by mpe · · Score: 2

    By contrast, the phonograph record was in use for over 70 years before anything really began to render it obsolete.

    It wasn't so much "rendered obsolete" as killed off by the manufactures. At least they tried, but club DJ's wouldn't accept the "subsitute" as an alternative.

  96. fair compensation. by slaida1 · · Score: 1
    profit is perfectly valid reason, getting rich overnight isn't. moreover, getting rich by something not valuable in itself but using law to manipulate things to make extra money with it is wrong!

    there's always people unable to see things without examining it thorough applicable laws and regulations. so then there will always be persons or entities using holes that conservative forces don't dare to patch up.

    it tells something about complexity of nation's laws when ordinary citizens give up on thinking what's right and what's wrong and resort to law-jargon and prior cases instead.

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  97. Collecting licencing fees or dictating how to use? by slaida1 · · Score: 1
    As long as these three are after their unlicensed technology and not enforcing cheap cashing schemes, it's ok with me.

    If they really want to target only makers of DVD players, they should get their own act together and level the prices of DVDs in different regions or stop this stupid region coding BS altogether.

    When somebody drives their own interests on the back of a legitimate (or good) cause, that somebody ought to get punished big time for using people's good will to wrong causes! (hint.hint.gwb, don't let us down)

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
  98. Re:They're trying to send a message by Rakarra · · Score: 1
    2) Unlicensed players are likely not to handle instructions/layered disks etc properly.



    Well, NO. They can produce a player but they forget to implement the instruction set? Unlikely.



    Actually, this is true. A number of players just don't impliment all of the instruction set or do it incorrectly. The famous Apex 600A for example, has quite a few problems with this sortof thing (like on the Abyss DVD..)