Slashdot Mirror


China Wants Out of Spam Blocks

SomeoneYouDontKnow writes: "Apparently, China is feeling the effects of the e-mail blocks Western ISPs are placing on Asian mail to prevent spam, as previously reported here. A group of Chinese legislators is calling for the blocks to be lifted because they're making it difficult for them to communicate via e-mail, and a signed article in The People's Daily is calling on China to ban spam. Maybe now some of the lazy admins of these spam-spewing mail servers will clean up their acts."

398 comments

  1. Serves em right by cscx · · Score: 1

    Half the stuff in my Hotmail box is in funny symbols due to Asian character set encoding.

    1. Re:Serves em right by uspsguy · · Score: 1

      I just set a filter to delete anything with an arbitrary asian character. cut my spam waaay down.

      --
      Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
    2. Re:Serves em right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont forget dog meat!

      "foff china"

      thank you, and good night.

    3. Re:Serves em right by Heem · · Score: 2

      How did you set that? I'd like to do the same Maybe I'm missing something obvious - but wouldnt you have to make a filter for EACH asian character to accomplish this?

      --
      Don't Tread on Me
    4. Re:Serves em right by gregor_b_dramkin · · Score: 2

      I've been having tons of Korean spam lately.
      in KMail, I set up a filter (under 'settings')

      if a message contains
      ks_c_5601-1987 or euc-kr
      it goes straight to the trash.

      --
      You can never equivocate too much.
    5. Re:Serves em right by Deliri...uhmmm · · Score: 1

      I filter anything with the Yen symbol in it. That get's rid of almost all the Japanese spam, just like filtering anything with a dollar sign gets rid of the US spam.

      It's a little heavy handed, so I just filter it to a seperate mailbox and check it occasionally rather than delete it.

    6. Re:Serves em right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm .. well, easily more than 95% of the spam I get in my inbox (here in Africa) comes from the USA. Worse, much of it is only of relevance to US people (i.e. "offers", porn sites, "services" etc only available in the US), so it definitely is of US origin. I see a lot of "hey China should ban spam" messages on this /. thread, how 'bout less finger pointing elsewhere and lets see the USA do something their spam problem. Reminds me of the US saying "third world countries should clean up their act environmentally" when they're the worlds biggest greenhouse gas producer.

  2. but what if i wanted by Alcimedes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    some of those viagra infused chopsticks?

    shoot, better get on that before i stop getting 50+ e-mails about it a week.

  3. well by trelaneopn · · Score: 1

    if you're important enough to be a senator... do you still have to prefix your e-mails to the united states with "this is not spam"

    --
    a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
    1. Re:well by lordkuri · · Score: 0

      what would be the point in prefixing them with anything? We don't get them anyways =D

  4. Typical Chinese solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullet to the back of the neck for each sysadmin, wha doesn't deal with spammers on theis servers...

    Sounds good to me ;)

    1. Re:Typical Chinese solution by michib01 · · Score: 1

      What's the American solution? Gas? Electicity? Although I had to put filtering rules on *.jp, most of the spam I'm currently receiving comes from USA...

      Chi e' senza peccato scagli la prima pietra...

      --
      - "Having a clean conscience is sign of bad memory"
  5. This might be a silly idea, but... by Reedo · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they should do something about it closer to the source?

    Are there laws in China against sending spam in the first place?

    1. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there laws in China against sending spam in the first place?

      Yes, you'd expect a country that arrests or harrasses people for owning pets, not submitting to sterilization, being Christian, belonging to a non-violent cult (the name escapes me at the moment), runs students over with tanks, and harvests the organs of quickly condemned "prisoners" would have laws about email spam!

    2. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by NFW · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Most of the spam I get from Asian mail servers doesn't originate in Asia. It's from US-based spammers who exploit unsecured mail servers, and there seem to be a lot of those in Asia.

      For example, when a Californian governor-wanna-be spammed his voters (and apparently lots of Canadians), his spam provider routed the spam through a hapless Korean elementary school.

      First the spammers polluted usenet, then email, now they're dicking with international relations. What a lovely bunch of lowlifes.

      Reuters has an article on this topic as well.

      --
      Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
    3. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by nazgul@somewhere.com · · Score: 1

      While it's certainly true that much spam from China is relayed, they generate huge amounts in Chinese too. At least half of the 20-30 pieces I get every day is in Chinese, most of it coming from ISP's like 163.net. In fact I ended up simply blocking all numeric-only domains in my spam rules.

    4. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      A lot of my friends and family in China own pets, and none of them are arrested. People who run students over with tanks are criminals and get arrested and prosecuted. So much for your FUD.

    5. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      So they arrested all the folks responsible for Tianamen Square? Last time I checked they were still running the country. So much for YOUR FUD.

      The Crazy Finn
      Sic Semper Tyrannis

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    6. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Nope, now you're spreading crap again.

    7. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      And how am I spreading crap? You said they arrest people who run over students with tanks. I asked if the folks responsible for the most famous incident of such had been arrested, and stated that they hadn't, which is entirely correct.

      I suggest you check your facts, before you complain about other FUD.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    8. Re:This might be a silly idea, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't. I said people who run students over with tanks ARE THE CRIMINALS. I said the tank drivers are the criminals, not the students!

      Tip: learn to read.

  6. Odd that China is looking to take barriers DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This, the country that works to keep free thought and communication away from their citizens? :confused:

    1. Re:Odd that China is looking to take barriers DOWN by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 4, Informative

      Spam is not free open communication: a bilateral exchange of ideas, or even a onesided thoughtful discourse. Spam is advertising. Democracy is based on the freedom to discuss ideas and differences. Especially its about allowing the expression of ideas that we aren't so fond of ourselves. If "spam" were thoughtful and attempted to express thoughts or ideas in a meaningful way, then we'd call it "journalism" or "literature", and *pay* to have it delivered in a timely manner. Its not. We don't. End of rant :-)

    2. Re:Odd that China is looking to take barriers DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but they probably think there is money they are missing out on.

    3. Re:Odd that China is looking to take barriers DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't believe everything you see on CNN.

    4. Re:Odd that China is looking to take barriers DOWN by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      This, the country that works to keep free thought and communication away from their citizens? :confused:

      I find it very amusing. They tried erecting "The Great Firewall of China" and now the world is erecting their own firewall -- not to keep information out of China, but to keep SPAM in.

      I'm not sure when the Firewall will come down, but I'm fairly certain the admins will do as much as they can, quickly, to stop the SPAM problem.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  7. This is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This will make them force their admins to lock down the machines and ban spam. Later versions of sendmail still compile on very old versions of Unix, so having old hardware and software is no excuse. If they run some crappy Windows program, maybe they'll switch to Red Flag Linux, or at least some other crappy Windows program that works better.

    1. Re:This is a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that the problem is more often unsecured old sendmail installs than IIS installs.

      Obviously, if you can get a nice pool of technologically knowledgable people, that's good, but if you have people that can only click the checkboxes and hit the enter key, you gotta get 'em what they can use.

      And Asia is not the most computer-literate place in the world. Japan's particularly pathetic, ironically enough. Lots of tiny little cheap plastic gizmos that can show email, but not many real computers.

  8. Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by darn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if I can convince the EU to block all mail from USA. That is where I get almost all of my spam from.

    -----------
    Look at thyself before thou judge other

    1. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by dananderson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's funny. Besides China/HK/Taiwan/Korea/Japan, I get a lot of spam from EU. Especially Denmark and Spain.

      However, at least some of the EU and USA ISPs respond to spam complaints. None of the Asian countries above have responded to spam complaints. It's not just a language problem either. I get (or used to get before my spam filters went up) technical requests (in English) from Asia as the result of USENET postings and FAQs I wrote.

      I'm hopeful that one or more of the Asian countries above will clean up my act and I can remove my spam filters.

    2. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is other? Must be some person if he/she is in a class of his/her own!

    3. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by cyroth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it didn't take a very long time for this to get noticed and actioned by the Chinese. Just goes to prove, fear is a very powerful tool.

    4. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by BJH · · Score: 1

      It's not just a language problem either. I get (or used to get before my spam filters went up) technical requests (in English) from Asia as the result of USENET postings and FAQs I wrote.

      ...and OBVIOUSLY the people spamming you are the same ones who are asking you questions. I mean, it just stands to reason, doesn't it?

    5. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by dananderson · · Score: 1
      Of course not. However, it means there are several people floating around in China that are technically able or know English or both.

      To say nobody knows english or noone knows how to configure computers (even something as simple as closing an open relay or replying to email) is avoiding responsibility.

    6. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I wonder if I can convince the EU to block all mail from USA. That is where I get almost all of my spam from.

      YES! Well, not to *that* extreme, but certainly blocking all the offending domains. YES, if there is a U.S. - originating spam problem, the EU would be doing *all* of us a favor by implementing such an "Internet Death Sentence". USENET death sentences work extremely well; I imagine the similar one for email would do the same.

      Your suggestion is a good idea; see if it's possible to make it work.

    7. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by Roach · · Score: 0

      You are a j@ck@ss. Maybe America should block you out.

    8. Re:Maybe we should use that tactic more often... by minas-beede · · Score: 1

      Great point. I'm happy as can be to see the honeypot in Moscow trapping (preventing delivery) of the U.S. spam that Ralsky is trying to realy through it.

      I look forward to the day when there are similar honeypots throughout China, Taiwan, and Korea. To a relay spam honeypot it is immaterial where the spam originates: the spam is stopped. Such honeypots are a valuable addition to the arsenal of anti-spam weapons.

      see: http://fightrelayspam.homestead.com/files/antispam 03102002.htm

  9. why dont' they use it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u'd think they could just use this as a sort of twisted way to isolate their people from the rest of the world...
    i'd certainly rather they just clean up the isps though.

  10. China just doesn't get it. by Joe+Groff · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The Chinese government has constantly shown how terribly naïve they are with regards to the Internet.
    • They want to reap the commercial benefits without accepting the other consequences of a global computer network: namely, the inevitably open society the Internet promotes. Their feeble attempts at firewalling and sheltering their people are eventually going to collapse under the insurmountable weight of the reality that information wants to be free.
    • They want to use email, but can't accept that people don't want crap to be mass-mailed to them. This is a sure sign that China's only interest in the Internet is monetary, and that it is our duty to block off abusive .cn mail servers to show them that this bullshit doesn't play on the open Internet.
    China's always going to be in an awkward situation with regards to the Internet as long as they cling to their obsolete totalitarian, isolationist regime. Write your senators and tell them that all this dicking around with China is a farce, and must be stopped. Don't allow them on the Free Internet until they become a Free State, I say.
    --

    -Joe

    1. Re:China just doesn't get it. by PoshSpod · · Score: 5, Interesting
      China's always going to be in an awkward situation with regards to the Internet as long as they cling to their obsolete totalitarian, isolationist regime. Write your senators and tell them that all this dicking around with China is a farce, and must be stopped. Don't allow them on the Free Internet until they become a Free State, I say.

      Oh, boy. Where to begin? I think my favourite part of you post was the last line. You misunderstand the idea of freedom if you assume that you must be free to oppress others. China has a dictatorial regime, true; but if the internet is free then it should be embrace it, just as it embraces pornographers, neo-Nazis, gun nuts, religious zealots and all of the other dreadful things that we tolerate under the banner of free-speech but really wish weren¦t there.

      Second point is this idea that we can force change onto countries by ignoring them. The Americans don't seem to have learned much from Castro in the last 30 years. If change is to be brought to China then the only options we have available are

      to allow it to come fully into the free world and evolve

      war. I know which option I prefer.

      --

      This is my sig.

    2. Re:China just doesn't get it. by jsse · · Score: 2

      Don't allow them on the Free Internet until they become a Free State, I say.

      I wish you don't regard me as a communist when I say the contrary: how about Free Internet eventually makes them Free State?

      If you got to read the forums in China, you'd be suprise how people openly discussing all sort of matters, including (*can't say it or else they'll block /.*). Nobody speaks so openly before Internet, after Culture Revolution. You know I just feel like watching people demolishing Berlin Wall - but this time on the Internet.

      Sadly, sensitive issues like (*censor *) are still restricted, but it doesn't stop people speak it out, only all comments will be removed from forums, like some companies(*cough* sina.com.cn *cough*) do.

      The bright side is, they can still appear to the public, for may be several seconds, before they are being removed. This is a little spark of free speech that is growing among people. Better than nothing!

      Please, oh please, don't stop us using Free Internet. Don't squeeze the tiny little spark of freedom...

    3. Re:China just doesn't get it. by ajmarks · · Score: 0

      Information wants to be free? I can reading this but nobody I've asked has ever been able to explain to me how they know that information wants to be free. It seems that most people who claim "Information wants to be free," actually mean "I want your information to be free." Were all information free, there would be no privacy.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
    4. Re:China just doesn't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Second point is this idea that we can force change onto countries by ignoring them. The Americans don't seem to have learned much from Castro in the last 30 years.

      Ignoring Castro works fine... it just takes more patience. He'll kick the bucket in another few years or decades.

    5. Re:China just doesn't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Please, oh please, don't stop us using Free Internet. Don't squeeze the tiny little spark of freedom...

      Please, oh please, secure those open relays.

    6. Re:China just doesn't get it. by Glorat · · Score: 2

      Some of us Chinese happen to like the idea of a Free State and Free Internet. Shutting the *people* out of the internet is just reactive and bullying and doesn't help the people at all. If you want the Chinese to become free, you should be helping them to get as much of this "free information" as possible, not banning 1 billion people from it. And their reasoning for firewalling is control, not monetary.

      As for spam. Read the *&^%ing article. The people are trying to take steps to *reduce* spam. That is a good thing. It shows the policy of blocking China mail servers is having an effect.

      In a population of 1 billion, I can assure you that less than 0.01% of the population does not promote spam so be careful who you have a gripe with and who you want to penalise

    7. Re:China just doesn't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a thought for you: What if China officially maintains open relays so we do the filtering for them?

    8. Re:China just doesn't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Information wants to be free" is obviously rethorical because information has no free will and therefore can not "want". The phrase points to an understanding of what information is and how we handle it. By observation you'll see that information that has been created and passed on to a certain number of people can not be contained, only dilluted by misinformation at best.

    9. Re:China just doesn't get it. by hagardtroll · · Score: 1

      I think the words 'Information Wants to Be Free.' is more a theoretical concept than a free will decision. Sort of like entropy. That is, with energe things tend toward more organization.

      Or in pop culture terms. Like what that guy in Jurassic park said about the dinosaurs getting out. "Life will find a way."

      Information will be spread.

      Or like that old joke, three fastest ways to communicate. Telephone, telegraph and tell-a-lady. (e.g. gossip.)

      Information will eventually find its way out of the bonds that keep it.

    10. Re:China just doesn't get it. by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      Kennedy waited for Castro to die.
      Johnson waited for Castro to die.
      Nixon waited for Castro to die.
      Ford waited for Castro to die.
      Carter waited for Castro to die.
      Reagan waited for Castro to die.
      Bush I waited for Castro to die.
      Clinton waited for Castro to die.
      Bush II is waiting for Castro to die.

      You would think people would learn...

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    11. Re:China just doesn't get it. by smagruder · · Score: 2

      Are you suggesting that Castro will never die? :) Perhaps the Cuban Marxists would like to think that, but...

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    12. Re:China just doesn't get it. by amuro98 · · Score: 1

      Well, then you can thank that 0.01% of your countrymen for making your country's TLD (.cn) the most hated in the world.

      At this rate, by the time China DOES get a clue and starts dealing with its spam problem, they're going to need to get a new TLD and some new IP#s, since .cn and all its IP#s are blocked by untold numbers individual users and admins.

      And if just 0.01% of the remaining 99.99% of China's population had tried to make their voices heard that they wanted to do something about educating their fellow internet users about why spam is bad, maybe we wouldn't be looking at the next great wall of China.

      In the meantime, I'll continue to block all of China from my mailbox, as I've done for over a year now. I tried communicating with the admins in China, but all I ever got back in return was more spam.

      I'm glad to hear China is slowly becoming aware of their on-going spam problem. Maybe in another 3 or 5 years I'll consider removing China from my email filters.

    13. Re:China just doesn't get it. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      I don't block people, I block SERVERS. Yeah, alot of the spam originates from the US since most US companies have secured their servers. Since I have not received ONE valid email from chinese servers, I block ALL of them (by IP, not name.) I also block Japan, Korea, India, etc. Ditto with Europe.

      There is NO excuse for running open relays. None. If you can't secure it, you shouldn't be running it. Frankly, It would be nice to create laws banning open relays, proxies, etc. as WELL as spam.

      What may end up happening is people accept mail from local servers automatically (servers covered by local laws), and challenge all non-local mail (the whitelist - respond with password to be let through if you never emailed me before / TDMA like.)

      In a world-wide internet, laws can't be 100% effective, but they can help.

      The problem isn't technological, it's social. This is why laws are needed.

    14. Re:China just doesn't get it. by HP+LoveJet · · Score: 1

      This does not constitute a valid proof by induction. :)

      --
      spawn_of_yog_sothoth
  11. spam by trelaneopn · · Score: 3, Funny

    dear america,
    this legitimate e-mail is not spam, it is a message from china to the united states, that has been repeated 5 billion times, once for each citizen in our overpopulated ineptly run third world country.
    due to the fact that we're too poor to build nuclear missles, submarines aircraft carriers etc, we have instead come up with the following excellent products for you
    1. PORN! (hell EVERYONE LOVES PORN)
    2. herbal viagra, (ancient chinese formula)
    3. aluminum siding (houseing value-added feature)
    4. free vacations to hong kong (beautiful city, except when it rains... a lot)
    please enjoy these gifts and products courtousy of china.

    this message is not spam to be removed from this mailing list...

    --
    a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
    1. Re:spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think you'll find the Chinese build very effective nuclear missiles!

    2. Re:spam by Czarnian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, *VERY* funny. Racist slurs and a slight problem with demographics (5 bln is the world populiation). Moderators on crack?

    3. Re:spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, they're on opium. someone at thinknerd.com's been putting it in their nerd-drinks. it's ruining their teeth, too.

    4. Re:spam by trelaneopn · · Score: 1

      the point of this (asshole) was to be funny, not mathmatically racially or in any other way correct. you are right, it is wrong, and because it was wrong, IT IS FUNNY.

      --
      a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
  12. China Makes a Valid Point by hkhanna · · Score: 1

    People blocking servers that promote internet congestion for the betterment of the 'net? That's ridiculous. I think that's punishable by death in China.

    --

    Think nothing is impossible? Try slamming a revolving door.
  13. simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fix ur servers get access back

    1. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dipshit.

  14. Suuuuure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe now some of the lazy admins of these spam-spewing mail servers will clean up their acts."

    yeah. and maybe monkeys will fly out of my butt.

  15. Poland by Perdo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't forget these assholes:

    Hello from Poland!
    This message is sent to 200 000 recipients.
    We offer You the same mass mailing service and our prices are VERY cool!
    Our 13 months experience guaranties You excellent results! Please read some short FAQ before mailing Us questions:
    we use our servers - You get NO complains for sending mass messages!
    we have NO targeting options at the moment
    we send both plain text and HTML messages (less 20K bytes)
    we do not collect replies for this messages
    we can not host Your pageswe can order a domain for You
    this is 100% LEGAL
    we accept bank wire, WesternUnion and PayPal (buy we DISLIKE PayPal for some reasons)
    Our prices:
    $100 for 200`000 email messages using our mail list.
    $190 for 1`000`000 email messages using Your mail list.
    $250 for 1`000`000 email messages using our mail list.
    $190 for 1`000`000 email messages using Your mail list.
    $650 for 3`000`000 email messages using our mail list.
    $550 for 3`000`000 email messages using Your mail list.
    $1900 for 9`000`000 email messages using our mail list.
    $1700 for 9`000`000 email messages using Your mail list.

    Reply ONLY to mailings@messpro.com
    Also we offer UNTARGETED checked mail lists:
    $100 for 2'000'000 checked mail mail addresses
    $400 for 10'000'000 checked mail mail addresses
    $900 for 25'000'000 checked mail mail addresses

    Reply ONLY to mailings@messpro.com Best wishes, Teador Smornij

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:Poland by jedrek · · Score: 2

      What the hell does this have to do with Poland, other than the second line?

      jedrek

  16. first (shifman) post (damn there goes my karma) by trelaneopn · · Score: 1

    hey, can we extradite bernard shifman to china... he can teach them proper e-mail ettiquet, then life will be good again.

    --
    a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
    1. Re:first (shifman) post (damn there goes my karma) by Bladerunner2037 · · Score: 1

      [tongue-in-cheek]
      maybe someone over there will hire him for his excellent computer skills and we'll never see him again.
      [/tongue-in-cheek]

      --
      -- oodabadabaY
    2. Re:first (shifman) post (damn there goes my karma) by cecil36 · · Score: 2

      I doubt that will happen. Perhaps Bernie will hire someone to translate his resume into Chinese and repeat what he did here to offend every IT professional on the planet.

    3. Re:first (shifman) post (damn there goes my karma) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      hey, can we extradite bernard shifman [petemoss.com] to china
      Wouldn't that be an act of war?
  17. Let's not forget... by Murmer · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that as much as you might joke that spammers should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese government.

    --
    Mike Hoye
    1. Re:Let's not forget... by akma · · Score: 1

      Actually, it gets real funny then. Its about time some goverment gets the balls to shoot a few spammers. If only they'd do a live stream broadcast of it and set up an archive page...

      --
      akma
    2. Re:Let's not forget... by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

      And mass mail us all so we know about it!

      Oh, wait..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Let's not forget... by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      >...that as much as you might joke that spammers >should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot >less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese >government.

      I did not think that that was a joke at all.

    4. Re:Let's not forget... by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Informative
      • as much as you might joke that spammers should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese government

      In case anyone thinks you're being cute, it's entirely possible that spammers might be executed in China. A brief overview of the crimes that people have been executed for are:

      • Political activism
      • Murder
      • Rape
      • Manslaughter through drink driving
      • Pimping and forcible prostitution
      • Stealing cultural relics
      • Taking bribes
      • Tax evasion
      • Credit card fraud

      Surprised by any of the last ones? In 1979, there were 28 types of crime that carried the death penalty in China. By 1995, that had risen to 74, mostly by the addition of "economic offences". They admit to executing well over a thousand people a year (often after a public show trial or displaying the convicts in public places), and it's suspected that a lot more get a bullet in the head without even a record being made.

      Unfortunately, the USA has a policy of not criticizing China's execution policy (or that of any other state), as we have some cleaning up of our own to do. Engaging cynicism mode, you might ponder that the only part of it that our partially hereditary, 90% incumbent political class really object to is the crackdown on corruption and bribe taking, but of course, rank retains its priviledges in China, and the biggest criminals get jail time while their minions are executed.

      On the other hand, there is a certain horridly attractive efficiency to show trials and summary execution. Compare and contrast with the US system of interminable legal wrangling over minor technicalities, occasionally leading to fines that are either trivially small or unrealistically big, neither of which typically get paid.

      When you read the very occasional article that "Spammer X is fined Y dollars", remember that's just the first step in actually making them responsible for their actions. Even if you can get the fine to stick to them and not their shell company, if they don't pay to a third party or collection agency, they have to be brought back to court again, and it has to be proven that they haven't paid, at which they generally plead poverty and agree to pay off their $5 million debt at $10 a month. And if they don't pay that... you see where this goes? Judges are loathe to jail people over non payment of fines unless they're taking a political stand against them. It's only nice, police, law abiding folks that pay fines. If you want to keep pursuing a third party to make them pay, you have to keep paying up front to do so. The only winners are, as usual, the lawyers.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    5. Re:Let's not forget... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      If those people get executed, then it's their fault.
      No matter what you say, rape, murder, credit card fraud, ALL ARE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES!
      If they don't want to get executed, they shouldn't have done those criminal acts in the first place.

    6. Re:Let's not forget... by Jack+Auf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So typically American - force your viewpoint and "morals" on others. Why, if they don't adhere to the practices that you deem acceptable then they are barbarians!

      Personally I think the US should be much more liberal with the death penalty, and actually carry it out once it has been issued, and not wait the usual 15 years. Maybe then it would be safe to walk the streets at night in US cities like it is in every mainland Chinese city I've ever been to.

      Of course you, never having been to China, wouldn't know that. So much easier to pontificate, isn't it?

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    7. Re:Let's not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see how easy it is to pontificate with my dick in your mouth, faggot.

    8. Re:Let's not forget... by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > as much as you might joke that spammers should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese government.

      I was gonna suggest that if they can't recoup the costs of the bullets through selling live streaming video, they could harvest the organs and sell 'em for transplant.

      But spammers have no brains, heart, or balls, so those organs are off the list.

      Going down the list of organs that I've seen working on spammer bodies, we're down to one possible use. Colostomy patients who need asshole transplants. And it'd still be an insult to the transplant recipient's own shit.

      Oh well, it was a good idea while it lasted. Back to the streaming video idea.

    9. Re:Let's not forget... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • So typically American - force your viewpoint and "morals" on others

      Funnily enough, I'm not a citizen of the USA, but I'm writing for the benefit of the majority Slashdot audience. Oh, feel free to share (not force) your viewpoint on us.

      • Personally I think the US should be much more liberal with the death penalty, and actually carry it out once it has been issued, and not wait the usual 15 years

      And personally, I agree with you, for crimes where violence is used or threatened. That includes corrupt abuse of power by politicians and law enforcement. It does not include tax evasion, fraud, or property theft. I have no problem with the method, only the application.

      • Of course you, never having been to China, wouldn't know that. So much easier to pontificate, isn't it?

      Mmm, it would probably be petty and pointless to mention a one week business trip to Beijing, right? Unless I use it as an opportunity to mention how taken I was with the city, and yes, how safe I felt there.

      You'll note that I agree that the US legal system is a joke when it comes to dealing with petty crimes. I also agree that executions should be carried out quickly. The idea that a capital crime should be more appealable fundamentally wrecks the whole concept of a criminal legal system that deals in innocence and guilt. While I'm at it, I'd like to see public physical punishment be used for minor crimes. Yes, aka torture. Most truly successful systems of social justice used limited physical violence quite successfully before liberals and lawyers decided that was bad for Freedom and business respectively.

      If you go back and read what I wrote, you'll find that it mostly consists of some easily verifiable statements of fact. They will no doubt affirm the preconceptions of some readers, but do please bear in mind that I am pointing out that the US government is only better (or worse, depending on how you feel about hypocrisy) by degree regarding executions, and that I do try and present a gentle counter that suggests that maybe the US system isn't all peaches-and-cream.

      Or, I could just have launched into a pontificating attack. Would that have provoked thought, or just attracted denial and spite, do you think?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    10. Re:Let's not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well...see, spam may not be individually that damaging. I mean, I'd much rather recieve a spam than get killed with an axe or something else that we consider a nasty crime. But when you send out millions of emails, the damage of the crime escalates a millionfold.

      So is capital punishment reasonable for spamming? I'd probably move more towards life imprisonment, but it'd require multiple convictions.

    11. Re:Let's not forget... by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      What, you didn't think that I was serious?

      Actually, I wasn't. Torture should precede the shooting.

      People think that I'm just playing some part of a bitter spam-hater when I "joke" about executing spammers. Truth is, I am a bitter spam-hater and I'm not joking.

    12. Re:Let's not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A brief overview of the crimes that people have been executed for>
      Four of those look legitiamate, assuming the the offendor has a fair trial. Of course, that's not an assumption that I would make about China.
    13. Re:Let's not forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...that as much as you might joke that spammers should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese government.

      You're right: getting shot is too good for spammers.

    14. Re:Let's not forget... by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      Well for those who don't know sarcasm... Of course capital punishment is not reasonable for spamming. For repeat offenders maybe.

      Seriously, a long term imprisonment might even be a harsher punishment. Depends on where you are jailed. Bend over please.

  18. Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Romancer · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you have a problem you fix the problem.
    We fixed a problem of recieving spam from their open relays by blocking them from sending to us.
    We asked them to close their relays and they said no or didn't respond, so we blocked them.

    Now they want us to unblock them and the answer seems fairly obvious to me. NOT until you close your relays which is why you are blocked!

    Quote: "Peter Lovelock, director of Beijing-based consultancy MFC Insight, said the National People's Congress might be swayed to pass laws calling for more rigorous management of Internet-linked servers in China in order to avoid international embarrassment."

    If it's such a problem that your "Chinese legislators" are getting involved they should stop complaining that they're bring punished and fix the problem.

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by gnovos · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you have a problem you fix the problem.
      We fixed a problem of recieving spam from their open relays by blocking them from sending to us.
      We asked them to close their relays and they said no or didn't respond, so we blocked them.


      I wonder if the trick might be to write mailservers that backtrack the email's headers and check for open relays before passing it on. No need to have an actual list, it would be automagic!

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that might work. For every mail sent, have a couple of servers test the sending servers. Looks efficient to me.

    3. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the same thing at first, but really, with caching I think it would work. I actually thought they already do this...

    4. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

      I thought the same thing at first, but really, with caching I think it would work. I actually thought they already do this...


      They do - it's call a block list or black hole list. Some people test servers and post a cache of which ones are open relays. That way you don't have to go to the trouble of performing the test yourself.

      The trouble with block-lists is they also block legitimate email along with the spam. This can be very annoying to those who are found guilty by association, but most people believe the collateral damage is an acceptable price to pay. Of course, most of the people who say that don't pay the price...

      The best solution for this particular problem IMO would be setting up some central email server that are properly run. I.e. tell anyone who's running an open relay that they have to switch their users to a state run email server, and shut their server off.

      -- Spam Wolf - the best vaporware on the net.
    5. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      Wow, brilliant. It should be fairly easy to implement too. One problem would be non-standard ports, or if it is a proxy server or something else that isn't strictly an open relay. Our server, for example, accepts incoming connections on SMTP, but it won't actually transmit an email unless it's addressed to our secondary domain (seems like a hack-job, but I didn't set it up)

    6. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by serutan · · Score: 2

      Right on! And yet these same legislators think it's fine to put up a colossal firewall to control their own citizens' access to the Internet. Tough shit boys.

    7. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Alsee · · Score: 2

      The best solution for this particular problem IMO would be setting up some central email server.

      I bet Microsoft would volunter to set up the central server. No way they can resist another monopoly. The fact that this new monopoly would be enforced by a death penalty would just be icing on the cake :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    8. Re:Common sense! NO open relay = no block by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > > The best solution for this particular problem IMO would be setting up some central email server.

      > I bet Microsoft would volunter to set up the central server.

      They could call it, oh, maybe "hotmail" would be a good name. Yes, that kind of central server would definitely help keep down the spam.

      Chris Mattern

  19. Actual URL by wenzi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the actual article ( if you can read chinese, sorry ) http://www.southcn.com/it/ittout/200203050573.htm

    --
    -- I doubt, therefore I might be.
    1. Re:Actual URL by Hanno · · Score: 2

      Could someone translate and/or post a summary of this, please?

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    2. Re:Actual URL by Wolfier · · Score: 1

      babelfish can translate from Chinese too

  20. The Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Knowing the Chinese, spammers will be executed.
    Mayber the US should follow that example. Spamming should be a capital offense.

  21. Re:Yeah right by Jeremi · · Score: 2
    The Chinese government wants their own Network that is totally controlled, and censored, and inaccessible from outside.


    Given that, why is it that they can't be bothered to check their spam relays, to make sure they are "inaccessible from outside"???

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  22. Maybe ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Maybe now some of the lazy admins of these spam-spewing mail servers will clean up their acts."

    Maybe some of these admins ARE the spam-spewing individuals.

    ~LoudMusic

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  23. A group of Chinese legislators? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, don't be so high-sounding... they're just "Delegates to China's parliament", a bunch of >60 old bumps, all they do is to bullshit and then clap their hands, then a 'law' is passed! (If you've seen the news footage you'll know what I mean)

    Them Legislators?!

    1. Re:A group of Chinese legislators? by mccalli · · Score: 2
      they're just...a bunch of >60 old bumps, all they do is to bullshit and then clap their hands, then a 'law' is passed! Them Legislators?!

      Differing from Congress how exactly? Or the UK's current parliament come to think of it.

      Cheers,
      Ian

  24. Re:Yeah right by nemesisj · · Score: 1

    You're a moron. Everyone in China knows what happened on June the 4th, they just know better than to discuss it with a foreigner who doesn't have a clue.

  25. Er, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But that wasn't a troll...

    -jcg

  26. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The word China in Chinese means, "Center (sic) Country"

    That's because, when they named their country (when the whole of the USA still belonged to the natives of America) they were the central country of their known world. Japan, Korea, Mongolia, India...

    They have a very arrogant view of theirselves

    No more arrogant than the US and certainly less judgmental.

  27. Spam blocks are unfair by PoshSpod · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I know that I've said things like this last time this was discussed but these 'spam' blocks are unfair and deny the point of the internet.

    I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get e-mail through to some of my family and friends. Now I¦m a decent person, I post to /. send in bug reports for open-source software and I¦ve never spammed anyone in my life but I still have to suffer these restrictions.

    The whole joy of the internet is that anyone can communicate with anyone else. If an ISP were to put a blanket ban on certain websites because a few of them throw up annoying adverts there would be outcry. Freedom of communication is considered important enough that people just have to deal with the annoying side effects themselves. Why is this not the case with e-mail as well?

    I hope that China does something about spam mail but this really is not the way to encourage it.

    --

    This is my sig.

    1. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by macrom · · Score: 1

      So why can you not sign up for a free Hotmail or Yahoo, etc. account so your e-mail isn't actually coming from Hong Kong. Are those sites blocked off from your access point over there?

      greg

    2. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intern-Guy: Maybe you could take pills for that.
      Pregnant-Dilbert: stop trying to solve my problems. I just wanted to be empathetic. Why are you always trying to solve my problems.

    3. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not sure if I can totally disassociate what I'm about to say with the idea that I do agree that as a whole I would rather the internet were left "on" rather than having parts of it shut off.

      But to speak generally to your statement that what is being done isn't right because it makes life for you a bit more difficult:

      Well that is sort of the point. The idea is that eventually the folks who don't have a stake in the offending activity (spam in this case) and who don't feel that it is all that bad, might realize how offending it is to others and do something about it.

      So now not only am I calling for the end of open relays but so are your. Of course it does in effect boil down to a form of black mail which as I'm writing this I have a bit of a problem with. But the idea is that it forces people who might otherwise be dispassionate about a subject to become passionate.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    4. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by dubl-u · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get e-mail through to some of my family and friends. Now I¦m a decent person, I post to /. send in bug reports for open-source software and I¦ve never spammed anyone in my life but I still have to suffer these restrictions.

      I'm a decent person, but for years I've lived in bad neighborhoods. Many of my friends aren't comfortable visiting me. Is that unfair? Or just reasonable behavior?

      Regardless, my whining doesn't make them come visit me more often. So a few years back I moved to a slightly better area and I do what I can to make my new 'hood safer still. Perhaps you could try that? Given your location and your language skills, you could be a big help to the anti-spam community.

      I hope that China does something about spam mail but this really is not the way to encourage it.

      That's a nice thought, but utterly wrong. Something like this is the only way to encourage it. Chinese spammers have been a problem for quite a while, but a gazillion complaints had as much effect as the chirping of sparrows. It's only widespread blocking that has made the government sit up and take notice.

      It's sad that it had to come to this, but the only lesson to learn is that ignoring spam doesn't make anything better; the longer you wait, the more painful it is to clean up.

    5. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by kyras · · Score: 1

      Come, now. This is the same idea behind the US embargo on Cuba. And what that's done there is make the poor people (i.e., the masses) in Cuba less capable of doing anything about Castro, while not hurting Castro in the least. What would help Cuba out of their problems is more money; I think a more open society follows the bourgeosie. Just my opinion, perhaps. OTOH, China is a different animal in the whole SPAM (tm) debate. I'm not saying they shouldn't be blocked, I'm just saying that your rationale for blocking them has a bit of a flaw.

      --
      Tastes like burning! - Ralph Wiggum
    6. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by krogoth · · Score: 2

      Softhome has free POP3/SMTP service. If you have a mail server you could set up restricted relaying.

      --

      They that quote Benjamin Franklin on liberty and safety deserve neither.
    7. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can't get e-mail through to some of my family and friends. Now I'm a decent person, I post to /. send in bug reports for open-source software and I've never spammed anyone in my life but I still have to suffer these restrictions.

      There are two things you can do:

      • Ask your ISP to close the open relays
      • Switch ISPs

      When you continue to pay your ISP without complaining YOU are part of the spam problem. You help paying the spammers.

      So, yes, the blocks are completely fair.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    8. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of communication is considered important enough that people just have to deal with the annoying side effects themselves.

      Isn't blocking annoying spammers one of the side effects? I believe it is.

      Drink your own medicine and deal with it.

    9. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Regardless, my whining doesn't make them come visit me more often. So a few years back I moved to a slightly better area and I do what I can to make my new 'hood safer still. Perhaps you could try that? Given your location and your language skills, you could be a big help to the anti-spam community."

      You mean people should all just move out of Hong Kong or China Just to send email? I don't know, but I am just about to call you MORON.

      "Chinese spammers have been a problem for quite a while, but a gazillion complaints had as much effect as the chirping of sparrows"

      Good God I think I recv porn sites Spam mail more often than anything else, and those girls are certainly not chinese. Maybe Chinese are opening Porn sites with some Blond girls with fake boobs, who knows.

    10. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the open relays. Even if the porn spam originates from somewhere other than China, it is often redirected through an open relay to obscure its origin. A very large proportion of the open relays are in China and Taiwan.

    11. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      You mean people should all just move out of Hong Kong or China Just to send email?

      The house-moving metaphor was just that: a metaphor. Translated to 'net terms, this means: move your internet persona out of China/Hongkong, i.e. get a damn hotmail address. (My gawd, even hotmail earns more respect than .cn or .hk...)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    12. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by klieber · · Score: 1
      If an ISP were to put a blanket ban on certain websites because a few of them throw up annoying adverts there would be outcry.

      ISPs do this all the time. Earthlink and AOL both block all outbound access to port 25 for their users. You can access your own ISPs SMTP servers, but no others. Why? Because of spammers who sign up for throw-away dial-up accounts. Is it inconvenient? Yes. Do I, as an Earthlink user, complain about it? No, because I understand why it's necessary. Also, let's not forget the Usenet Penalty of Death. It was used when moron sysadmins refused to clean up their acts as well. (It doesn't carry quite the weight it once did since Usenet has been on the decline the last few years)

      Freedom of communication is considered important enough that people just have to deal with the annoying side effects themselves.

      I don't think you understand the full ramifications of spam. If everyone were to run unfettered open relays, email systems across the world would come to a screeching halt and NOBODY would be able to communicate. People don't do this just because they find spam annoying -- they do it because spam costs real cash money and puts a tremendous burden on mail servers.

      --
      Gentoo Linux http://gentoo.org/
    13. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by mazachan · · Score: 1

      Interesting enough, I have a Yahoo account that I specifically use to sign on to mailing lists and whatnot. It's interesting to see that out of all the spam that I get, I would say 60% comes from Yahoo or hotmail accounts whereas, only 1-2% come from overseas. Most of the spam that I get are coming from the US. (BTW, I do live in the us)

    14. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Lokinator · · Score: 1

      Some ISP's offer as a FEATURE that they block (or at least try to) certain sorts of sites; almost all ISP's have spam block ranges or approaches in place regarding known spammers.

      In the first case, this is less about Freedom, than what the customer is willing to pay cold hard cash for - some customers WANT a filtered experience, and part of the freedom they enjoy is to seek out and "enjoy" such filtering - it is only when such filtering is forced on the unwilling that it becomes vile and oppressive.

      In the second case, IT'S MY SERVER - and I'll block who I bloody well please. If US Congress critters are sufficiently annoying, I may block .gov relaying; if the Australian Gov't's rampant ludditism offends, I may block .au; and if after endless complaints re open relay servers by multiple players fails to effect change in the behaviour of the open relay operators, I may block them - and where there are enough of them, I may begin blocking entire TLD's or IP Blocks. It is, after all, my server, and just like my living room, I get to decide who I'm going to let in.

      Let there be no doubt. The recent weeks increased blocking of asian mail servers has been successful in getting the attention of the folks blocked, indicative of a successful approach. We need, however, to provide solutions as well as stimuli, lest the Chinese government or others become excessively creative.

      May I suggest a three prong approach?

      1) Continue the blocks of any offenders not demonstrated to have closed open relays.

      2) Creation of, as suggested by another poster, Open Relay Correction Notice websites - wherein the offended administrator would fill in the blanks on a form in the appropriate language and hit "send" and have the message sent off in said appropriate language to the offender.

      3) Encourage LIMITED anti-spam laws in China. I think, for instance, that execution is a bit of a heavy handed response for operating an open relay.

      thoughts?

      --
      "It is morally wrong to initiate the aggressive use of force.." Of course, defensive force is fair game...
    15. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why can't you get a hotmail account? (or one of the other ones if you're anti-msoft or something)

    16. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      I guessing 0% (or a low number) is actually coming from hotmail or yahoo.

      The From Line != where it comes from. Read the received line. Most of the ones I get that say yahoo or hotmail come from an open relay in Korea or China.

    17. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, yes, the blocks are completely fair.


      Grrr... the blocks may be justified, perhaps even necessary, but they aren't "fair".

    18. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Quintin+Stone · · Score: 1

      Who said life is fair? Where is that written?

      --

      "Prejudice is wrong; you should hate everyone the same."

    19. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw. Just punish spammers. Not open relay people. No one runs an open relay on purpose.

      You could finance educational materials instructing people how to secure their mail server.

    20. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if we could figure out a some kind of block to get the chinese government to realize that their human rights violations are unacceptable. "Hey, my 12 year old can't correspond with US kids via email" ... "Well shit, maybe if he wasn't working 12 hour days we'd do something about it"

    21. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get e-mail through to some of my family and friends.

      Is it possible to get a Hotmail or Yahoo account to communicate with family and friends?

      (I know the government erected "The Great Firewall of China" so it may not be as easy as I think -- hence the question.)

      What's interesting is this is yet another instance in which government policy moves industry out of the country. Although Yahoo and Hotmail don't make (much?) money from subscribers.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    22. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

      "I hope that China does something about spam mail but this really is not the way to encourage it."

      This is _exactly_ the right way to encourage it. This was not the first thing tried. Contacting the ISP was found to be useless. If direct and to the point communication fails what else remains?

      I realize that most people in China do not spam and that most of the spam coming out of China is being bounced from the US. However, it is the open mail servers that are allowing this relaying. The admins of these servers have a responsibility to the world community to see to it that their equipment isn't being abused in this way.

      The bottom line is that if they are unwilling or unable to take control of their mail servers then the world must find other methods to stop the flow of spam.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    23. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, but you're still missing the point. Say you want to do business in Hong Kong. When you're located there you have a certain number of choices for ISPs and if the scheme works anything like it does in the USA you have to sign a multiyear contract. Say a year into your 5 year contract the spam crowd decides the whole class b of your upstream ISP is evil and shouldn't be able to email. THIS is the problem your wonderful antispam crap doesn't address well.

      And please, have you ever used a hotmail account? First, I don't like the interface, second, it is a spam magnet. What you're basically saying is that I have to go buy access to somewhere that lets me use a nice unix shell to read my email. And then, a few months into that when I get everyone moved over to my new identity I can have them get blocked in the name of antispam too.

      Antispam blocking has too much collateral damage. For every one spammer you hit you're hitting a hundred people who don't even comprehend the reason they're being blocked. I don't understand why SO much time has been devoted to kludging the current system instead of redesigning the email system to prevent spam in the first place.

      I think most of you people who can nonchalantly talk about spam blocking not being a problem have never had the occasion to be in the collateral damage. Have never had the antispam community thumb their nose at you. And, some of those wonderful block lists you support are just as shady as spammers. Take a look at how SPEWS works. They don't even give a real contact point.

    24. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      these 'spam' blocks are unfair
      No, they are perfectly fair.
      and deny the point of the internet.
      The point of the Internet is cooperation among autonomous networks obeying a common set of rules. If you break the rules, then you should expect the cooperation to be withheld. I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get e-mail through to some of my family and friends. That's unfortunate, but a provider's responsibility is to its customers, not to you. If you want them to accept mail from you, then you have to play by their rules.
      The whole joy of the internet is that anyone can communicate with anyone else.
      No. Span has been forbidden since the days of the ARPA net.
      If an ISP were to put a blanket ban on certain websites because a few of them throw up annoying adverts there would be outcry.
      Unless that outcry came from it's customers, the ISP would say, quite properly, that it is NOYB.
      Freedom of communication is considered important enough that people just have to deal with the annoying side effects themselves.
      The most important freedom is the freedom to be left alone. The spam interferes with our freedom of communication. And it is not just annoying, it is also theft.
      Why is this not the case with e-mail as well?
      It is. That is why the spam must be eliminated, so that we are free, without hindrance, to accept communications from those that we want ommunications from.
    25. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by infochuck · · Score: 1

      >I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get >e-mail through to some of my family and friends. Now >I¦m a decent person, I post to /. send in bug >reports for open-source software and I¦ve never >spammed anyone in my life but I still have to suffer >these restrictions.

      So? Use a web-based email service. So you can't get POP3/SMTP. So fucking what? Cry to your sysadmin who is operating an open relay.

    26. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      Ok, but you're still missing the point. Say you want to do business in Hong Kong. When you're located there you have a certain number of choices for ISPs and if the scheme works anything like it does in the USA you have to sign a multiyear contract.

      Ok, so before signing a multi-year contract, first make sure whether it is in your best interest to tie yourself into such a long-running agreement or not. Computers are a fast-moving business, and what is a good deal today, may not be a good deal tomorrow. Keeping the option to move makes good business sense.

      Then, companies come and go all the time. Especially, in such a fast moving industry such as internet connectivity, you can never know whether your supplier will still be around in five years. Something to consider before doing an advance payment for five years.

      Say a year into your 5 year contract the spam crowd decides the whole class b of your upstream ISP is evil and shouldn't be able to email.

      Ok, so you have a contract with your ISP. In that contract, they guaranteed you connectivity. If they cannot follow up with their end of the deal for whatever reason, sue them. And if you didn't actually pay for the five years of service in advance, just move over to some better connected supplier. A little spine can go a long way.

      And please, have you ever used a hotmail account?

      Not really, except when I wanted to say something in an anonymous and untracable way. You have to use it together with an open proxy though, or else your browser's IP will give you away. But hotmail is just one example, which I picked because of its well-knowness. Zillions of other free e-mail services, such as yahoo.com exist though. Take your pick.

      First, I don't like the interface, second, it is a spam magnet.

      Starting to like the taste of your own medicine?

      Antispam blocking has too much collateral damage.

      Life isn't fair. But we know that. If you notice that your mail can no longer reach its intended destinations, complain to your ISP. You are their customer. You have a contract with them. They need your money. And, what's best, you speak their language, so they can't just pull an "ethikul biznizman" on you.

      For every one spammer you hit you're hitting a hundred people who don't even comprehend the reason they're being blocked.

      Ok, in that case, these hundred people will do the logical thing to do in such a situation: complain to their ISP. And if their complaints are not followed up to, they take their business elsewhere.

      I don't understand why SO much time has been devoted to kludging the current system instead of redesigning the email system to prevent spam in the first place.

      If that was actually done, your e-mail connectivity problems would still not be solved: your backwater ISP wouldn't notice that the world around it had switched e-mail delivery protocols, and your mails would bump into a taller wall than ever before...

      I think most of you people who can nonchalantly talk about spam blocking not being a problem have never had the occasion to be in the collateral damage.

      I think most people who nonchalantly talk about spam not being a problem never had the occasion to be in the collateral damage. Like receiving over thousand bounced mails per day, because some moron sino-spammer thought it smart to use your e-mail in his forged From field of his missives, so you, not him would get all the bounces and remove messages.

      Have never had the antispam community thumb their nose at you.

      Have never had spam-friendly ISP's thumb their nose at you? I tell you what: as long as you are not a paying customer of an ISP, they owe you nothing, and some do not hesitate to tell you so. It's an unfortunate fact of life that in our world of fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders, companies only start listening when you hit them in their pocketbook. Now, starting to understand why causing collateral damage among the paying customers of rogue ISPs makes so much sense?

      And, some of those wonderful block lists you support are just as shady as spammers. Take a look at how SPEWS works. They don't even give a real contact point.

      That's probably done just to keep the lame whiners away. If you have a real issue with SPEWS, just post to news.admin.net-abuse.mail, and you will either be told why the block is still justified, or they'll eventually take it away.

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    27. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by raian · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I live in Japan and I also have this problem.


      Case in point: several months ago emails to my father started bouncing. After some investigation I got in touch with the sysadmins at his company. Apparently they were spammed or hacked once by someone with an account at my ISP, so they decided to block the entire ISP, forever.


      BUT: my ISP is one of the largest in Japan, and I know for a fact they run a tight-ship. They even have an ad campaign to inform people how they can help to fight spam. But someone slipped through the cracks, and as a result, some lazy US sysadmins blocked several hundred thousand email addresses, just because they reasoned, "Who would ever get email from Japan?" Typical American thinking: "Those other countries just exist on TV, right?"


      Clearly there are a LOT of evil spammers in China. But I wonder how many Chinese ISPs who are trying to do things the right way, by closing open relays, etc. are being cut off anyway due to lazy US sysadmins who have decided to deal with their spam problem by just blocking all packets from China.

    28. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      Typical American thinking: "Those other countries just exist on TV, right?"

      I grant entirely that many Americans are woefully ignorant of overseas events. But, having lived on four continents, I am at least slightly better off in this regard than the average gringo.

      So allow me to point out that "lazy", "efficient" , and "hopelessly overworked" can be hard to distinguish, especially from across an ocean. It could be, as you suggest, that they were typical slothful gaijin, only stirring themselves from their consumption of greasy hamburgers and watching of John Wayne movies long enough to drop you netblock in the bin, perhaps pausing momentarily to scratch their underwashed heads while saying, "Juh-pan? Didn't we kick their asses once?"

      Or it could be that they looked with loving care at their logs, said, "This week we got 148,000 pieces of spam from them, plus a hacker coming from that block just brought down the server of one of our biggest clients. We see no legitimate mail from them this week. Even worse, their abuse desk has not answered us! We'll block them until we hear otherwise."

      Or it could be that the sysadmin, like an awful lot of ISP admins, had been their 80 hours that week and just wanted to fucking go home, and that he didn't have handy his copy of "A Field Guide to Large, Respected, and Entirely Noble-Hearted ISP's in Japan", perhaps because noboby has written one.

      So given that alternative explanations exist, perhaps you could back right off on using the racial stereotypes that you yourself claim are part of the problem?

    29. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by crucini · · Score: 2

      Why didn't you include the name of your ISP? That way we could verify for ourselves whether they have run a tight ship. I notice that complaints like this rarely come with verifiable specifics.

    30. Re:Spam blocks are unfair by minas-beede · · Score: 1

      I sympathize with your situation and your point of view. I think that, in your position, you might be able to do something to help educate Chinese email adminstrators about how to cure some of their configuration problems.

      I strongly favor relay spam honeypots as a weapon against those who send relay spam. See: http://fightrelayspam.homestead.com/files/antispam 03102002.htm

      A few of these in China would have a tremendous effect. Recently /. reported on a single such honeypot in Moscow. It had trapped spam top about 1.7 million recipients at the time of the report. Now that has to be 2.2 million recipients: 508228 so far in the current spam run. This is a 100 MHz 486. A high-powered system is not needed if you wish to run a honeypot. Turn a few abused open relays into honeypots and watch the spammers retreat. Until they retreat watch them send tens of thousands of undelivered spam messages. It's a source of tremendous satisfaction to see the spam never be delivered. It's possibly to benefit over 1 million strangers and have them never even know you did it.

      Please give the idea some thought.

  28. Hmmm... by Coffee+Warlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it ironic that China is complaining about internet traffic restrictions?

    Pot. Kettle. Black.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      • Does anyone else find it ironic that China is complaining about internet traffic restrictions?

      Does anyone else find it ironic that the USA is too ignorant to distinguish between Chinese academics and the Chinese government.

      What's that you say? You personally don't represent the entire USA? Well, shucks, maybe that's true for people in other countries too.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chinese academics and the Chinese government"

      They're both short and yellow?

  29. This has potential. by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hm. "Send spam, get shot in the back of the neck." I like the sound of this.

    1. Re:This has potential. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you should be shot for your lame, crappy web page. Idiot!

    2. Re:This has potential. by PW2 · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games until you accidently hit that reply-to-all button to a message that contains lots of recipients.

  30. I wish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some one would make the spammers pay $0.01 for each spam mail sent...

  31. It sounds like constipation to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    All those emails trying to be sent but they can't because they are blocked... Keep on doing this for a while and they may just blow up.

    On a different tone, if we can't ourselves pass any meaningful legislation here, why do you expect them to clean up? Given the fact 99% of the fucking spammers are from right here, the gun loving US of A, the problem with the open relays in China is just a side effect. If we had the proper laws here, maybe Sendmail would not come with relay disabled by default. We would all spend all the time dealing with this crap doing something more useful.

    1. Re:It sounds like constipation to me... by forkboy · · Score: 1

      Given the fact 99% of the fucking spammers are from right here, the gun loving US of A

      It's really funny to me that people criticize a populace that enjoys the right to arm itself but yet has a distinct lack of snide comments about countries that still use firearms on demonstrators and students as general practice.

      Seriously though, I would LOVE to see legislation barring the advertising of ANYTHING via email. Don't hold the spammers responsible, hold the bastards that PAID THEM TO SEND OUT THE SPAM repsonsible. Fine them amounts far greater than the few thousand bucks they'll drum up blasting out a million emails. Spammers can be hard to find. Following the advertised link and then tracing it back to an ISP is pretty damn easy.

      Eventually, once foolish advertisers learn their lessons, no one will be paying spammers to spam and spam will cease to be spammed.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  32. Chinese laws: genuine effort, but ineffectual by dananderson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "[In the] People's Daily, Xu Detian called upon the National People's Congress to pass a law banning the sending of junk e-mail."

    This reminds me of my days in grad school in the early 1980s. I had two Chinese roommates. They subscribed to People's Daily to learn English (even though it had spelling and grammar errors, it was probably a good idea).

    Anyway, after a while the paper began to sound repeative. It would continaully brag about some "new effort" to do something such as "end corruption" or "end pollution" or "improve education." That was done by passing laws saying "don't do this" or issuing a directive to "do that." Nothing would actually hapen, it appears, as I would read about a very similar effort a few months later.

    So, although the Chinese are beginning to realize they need to do something about spam, don't hold your breath. Hopefully, they will come around some year to doing something effective . . . such as having ISPs actually respond to abuse reports and close open relays, for example.

    1. Re:Chinese laws: genuine effort, but ineffectual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyway, after a while the paper began to sound repeative. It would continaully brag about some "new effort" to do something such as "end corruption" or "end pollution" or "improve education." That was done by passing laws saying "don't do this" or issuing a directive to "do that." Nothing would actually hapen, it appears, as I would read about a very similar effort a few months later.


      I studied about the Chinese one-child policy at University. There is an extremely intrusive local official who visits families on a weekly basis to discuss birth control; regular 'health checks' for women basically to make sure they are not pregnant; various bribes and threats handed out to pregnant women who already have one child; and 'abortions' available anytime up until the actual birth date. (We actually saw an interview with an eight-month pregnant woman before and after her abortion.)

      To say that China does not act on it's policies is a gross misinterpretation of the situation. They cannot be both totalitarian and inactive.

      I finished the course more confused about China than when I started. And, in fact, the only thing I took from the course was to not believe anything written about China by either that Chinese or US press.

  33. Korea by nzhavok · · Score: 3, Informative

    is the country that spams me the most. Usually get between 1 and 10 per day from there, half of them porn. I mean spam is bad enough but Korean porn? Give me a break please!

    Probably along the line of china, the admins probably don't speak english or else couldn't give a shit to stop the spammers because I just keep getting it.

    --

    He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    1. Re:Korea by odaiwai · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, Korean porn...

    2. Re:Korea by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably along the line of china, the admins probably don't speak english

      Idea: can somebody who speaks chinese write a standard complaint about an open relay in chinese? Just leave a blank where we can fill out the IP address.

      If we've got such a standard template, the language barier is effectively broken and we're a (very) small step closer to a clean internet.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    3. Re:Korea by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      but then again, if you're going to look at porn you might as well make it Korean porn.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    4. Re:Korea by jaufrec · · Score: 1

      If someone who has sent such form letters can post one, preferably with simple instructions on how to close open relays for the common mail servers, I can get it translated and work out English-language instructions for how to deal with character set issues.

    5. Re:Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korean spam is called Kimchi. Get with the lingo.

    6. Re:Korea by nzhavok · · Score: 2

      jeeez for the slashdot pr0n guy I expected you to have better taste :)

      <profound statement>
      Korean pron is pies.
      </profound statement>

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  34. Re:harumph. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japs? Japs is a derogatory word for Japanese, not Chinese. What a fucking moron you are.

  35. Tiptoe, tiptoe, spam by JohnBE · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do we always tiptoe around China's sensibilities?

    We aid them block so called subversive sites from their entire country, we tolerate crackdowns on their populace, we paper over the facts, we supress demonstration when their officials visit our countries, we tolerate the occational nuclear secret heading their way and we've forgotton about Tienemen Square.

    Why? Are they as bigger threat as Russia was? Are they capable of collapsing the Western economies with the stroke of a pen? No! Their near slave labor, poor working conditions and semi-rural economy is the cheapest place to make our goods. That's all. If you want the support of the west just open up your market, keep prices cheap and keep production up.

    This spam blocking is another way of making China comfortable. Maybe we are doing the right thing and eventually (because of the increased trade) they'll become just like us. We'll just have to wait and see.

    --
    e4 e5
    1. Re:Tiptoe, tiptoe, spam by wsloand · · Score: 1

      Are they as bigger threat as Russia was? Are they capable of collapsing the Western economies with the stroke of a pen? No!

      Actually, yes. The Chinese military, if they decided to attack could kill everyone in the USA rather easily. Think about it this way, they have about 5 times the population, and their population averages to a younger age. We have a military of about 1-3 million. China has a military of over 10 million with the easy ability to conscript about 200 million more.

    2. Re:Tiptoe, tiptoe, spam by JohnBE · · Score: 2

      Between 1945 and 1949 the major threat that was presented to the allies was a Soviet conventional attack. In 1949 the Soviet Union got the bomb and this created a kind of stalemate.

      China is however not sealed from the outside, a large ammount of her income is from exports. In a nutshell we are too integrated for war.

      These days a large army is prefferable for defence and conventional attack. But don't confuse these with modern warfare and don't forget that the US is a lynchpin for the West. If China were to invade the US the earths crust would probably crumble from the number of nuclear exchanges.

      So we'll probably be in stalemate for a few decades yet ... bar Chinas weapons developement overtaking the wests and no Chinese internal rebellion.

      --
      e4 e5
  36. Of course it is unfair by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but please blame the spammers, and the lazy admins who don't stop them, not their victims.

    Spam basically makes email useless, it is certainly not the near real-time media it used to be. Blacklisting can make email almost useable again. Of course, it is nowhere near as useful as before the spammers took over, but at least the signal no longer totally drowns in the noice.

    Unless something effective is done to spam at the political level, we probably soon have to either give up email entirely, or switch to whitelists. With whitelists, only people in your address book can send mail to you directly. Other people may be able to come through after various kinds of verification. This will cut of many once useful features of email, but at least some core functionality will survive.

    Please do not blame the people who try to make email survive in spite of the spam onslaught. Without these people, email would die.

    1. Re:Of course it is unfair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whitelists could be cool.

      When you move to them, you also make PGP mandantory. The vast majority of email has been unencrypted for far too long. At the same time, you do any other architectural changes you need to make (I think it'd be cool to standardize support for a small subset of HTML in email, like the em and code tags).

      I'd be up for whitelists.

  37. Re:Chinese racial slurs by toiletsalmon · · Score: 0

    That's not nice! But it's funny as hell! :)

  38. should be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dear america,
    this legitimate e-mail not spam, it a message from china to united states, that be repeated 5 billion times, once for citizen our overpopulated ineptly runnedly third world country.
    due to fact that we to poor to build nuclear missle, submarine aircrafts carrier, we have insteaded camed up with following excellent product for you
    1. PORN! (hell EVERYONES LOVE PORNS)
    2. herbal viagras, (vewwy owd chinese formula)
    3. aluminum siding (houseing value-added feature)
    4. free vacations hong kong (beauty city, except when rains... a lots)
    please enjoy this gifts and products courtousy of china.

    1. Re:should be ... by trelaneopn · · Score: 1

      aah yes, pardon my grammatical error
      -editor of parent comment's parent

      --
      a bit more about me http://www.advogato.org/person/trelane/ or my private page http://trelane.net
    2. Re:should be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      deal amelica,
      this regitimate e-mair not spam, it a message from china to united states, that be lepeated 5 birrion times, once fol citizen oul ovelpopurated ineptry lunnedry thild wolrd countly.
      due to fact that we to pool to buird nucreal missre, submaline ailclafts calliel, we have insteaded camed up with forrowing excerrent ploduct fol you
      1. POLN! (herr EVELYONES ROVE POLNS)
      2. helbar viaglas, (vewwy owd chinese folmura)
      3. aruminum siding (houseing varue-added featule)
      4. flee vacations hong kong (beauty city, except when lains... a rots)
      prease enjoy this gifts and ploducts coultousy of china.

      :P

    3. Re:should be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you write in Chinese, dipshit.

    4. Re:should be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waaaah. pinko.
      if you take that tone with me again, mister, i'll throw you in a labor camp. my kid needs some new toys.

  39. China needs to understand the problem first by Skapare · · Score: 2
    According to a report last month on Wired News, a growing number of network administrators in the United States and Europe have begun blocking e-mails from servers in China, Taiwan and Korea.

    I've been blocking China (including Hong Kong), Taiwan, and Korea, for nearly 2 years now.

    "The majority of the junk mail (is) not created in China, so why (should) they block mail from China?" said Zeng Xiaozhen, a professor at Jilin University in the northeastern province of Jilin. He said spam was a global issue and China should make a law to punish creators of junk e-mail.

    First of all, I am not blocking mail from China; I am blocking mail from SMTP connections with a source address in the IP assignments to China, regardless of where it comes from. My preferred method of filtering is to prevent the delivery of spam in the first place. That means I block it by IP address or validated domain name. Mr. Zeng Xiaozhen needs to understand that the issue is about open relays, which intermingle mail originating from China, and mail being relayed by spammers.

    Separately, in a signed article posted on the Web site of China's party mouthpiece newspaper, the People's Daily, Xu Detian called upon the National People's Congress to pass a law banning the sending of junk e-mail.

    More of the spam from Chinese mail servers originates from other countries because the servers are open relays. They need to outlaw open relay servers, perhaps with some very harsh penalties.

    Also, since most of the open relays are older versions of Microsoft Exchange Server, it appears that software piracy is a big key here. I would assume that software systems Microsoft has sold in China came with documentation in Chinese. Pirate software often comes with little or no documentation. And what it does come with may not be the Chinese version in the first place, making it useless unless the administrator reads English (assuming most pirated software has some of that). If the Chinese government were to crack down on not only misconfigurations of mail servers, but also the use of any pirated commercial software (especially that connected to the internet), I think it would go a long ways to solving these problems. If the businesses doing this cannot afford a licensed copy of Microsoft Exchange server, maybe they need to switch to a system like Linux and use one of the Exchange-like clones, or ordinary mail software.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may not speak English well enough to communicate, but I am rpetty sure they can read pretty damn well. :)

    2. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by posmon · · Score: 1

      iirc you can't even disable relaying on versions prior to exchange 5.

      --

      update comments set karma=-1, reason='offtopic' where sid=26315

    3. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by kindbud · · Score: 2

      More of the spam from Chinese mail servers originates from other countries because the servers are open relays. They need to outlaw open relay servers, perhaps with some very harsh penalties....

      ...If the Chinese government were to crack down on not only misconfigurations of mail servers, but also the use of any pirated commercial software ...


      Calling for a repressive government to "crack down" on its citizens in the name of spam control and software piracy is absolutely disgusting. Have you completely taken leave of whatever shred of empathy you may have once posessed? Come on, man, think! Is imprisonment or execution really appropriate punishment for such "crimes" as spamming, running an open relay, or software piracy? Is that really what you think?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    4. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      Is imprisonment or execution really appropriate punishment for such "crimes" as spamming, running an open relay, or software piracy?

      I'd gladly trade any moral qualms I might have for the joy of seeing a few American spammers locked up. Yes, I'm serious, and no, I don't think that means I have a lack of empathy.

      I think that locking up a few spammers might make future spammers think twice.

    5. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by kindbud · · Score: 2

      I think that violence is not an appropriate response to non-violent acts. I think I would have the same problem condemning a man to prison for spamming as I would condemning a man to prison for possessing marijuana. Whether the act should be considered criminal is almost beside the point. In both cases, the punishment surely does not fit the crime, if we admit that either act is a crime at all.

      I speak as one who agrees that we are throwing too many people in prison already, and I agree with the folks who do not want any more prisons built. That seems to be most of the population, at least in California. If we do not want any more prisons built, and we profess democratic ideals, then we should not seek to imprison people needlessly, especially in overcrowded prisons, and especially not in prisons that are administered by repressive governments like China.

      I think that locking up a few spammers might make future spammers think twice.

      I think if we consistently held spammers financially liable for the headaches they cause, that would be sufficient deterrent and punishment. So far, we have hardly begun to try, only a few states have begun to get serious about it.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    6. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      I think if we consistently held spammers financially liable for the headaches they cause, that would be sufficient deterrent and punishment.

      No problem, that would work for me - but now we need a law that forces ISPs to turn over the name, address, and phone number to me so that I can sue them. Right now, most ISPs won't give you anything without a warrant.

    7. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Dude, the law you want already exists. It's the same law that says you have to get a warrant to obtain that info. How do you get a warrant? FILE A SUIT. There seems to be a certain pattern here... if you want to be taken seriously, you have to take serious action. Some of you seem to think that a magic wand should be waved on your behalf to make it all go away. That isn't how the world works. If you have a grievance, you file suit if you are serious about getting redress. All else is bluster and masturbation.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    8. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is imprisonment or execution really appropriate punishment for such "crimes" as spamming, running an open relay, or software piracy? Is that really what you think?"

      Yeah, what's it to you? It's my right to think and believe whatever I want, regardless of how perverse you think it is. It's not my right to act on those thoughts if they break the law. So shut up liberal.

    9. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by jchristopher · · Score: 1

      Uh, who do I file a lawsuit against? In what court? I don't even know if they are in the USA until I get that information from their ISP!

    10. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by kindbud · · Score: 2

      These questions are what lawyers are paid to answer.

      In most jurisdictions you can file a John Doe suit if you don't know the name of the party at the time of filing, and get the court to issue the warrant to the ISP so process can be served to the defendant. Consult your attorney. I suggest running the headers by someone who can read them to determine whether it's likely a party can be found in a jurisdiction you have access to. Consult your attorney.

      Look, I know all this due process stuff is a drag, but that's how things are done in the US. Only the big boys with lots of money can side-step due process from time to time <snicker>. You'd have to go through the same process if someone ripped you off via mail order, or you slipped in a pool of unmopped Slurpy at the 7-11.

      All your other questions are for your attorney. Like I said before, there is no magic wand you can get someone to wave on your behalf to make it all go away. Even in states that have anti-spam laws, their effect is really just to relieve the plaintiff of the need to show damages. In states without them, you'd probably have to show in court how the spam has harmed you. Consult your attorney.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    11. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by crucini · · Score: 2
      You would sue the ISP, in the jurisdiction where you are located. From this link:
      Once the ISP has been identified, Internet attorneys will frequently file a lawsuit for defamation against the ISP, knowing full well that it cannot be held liable. The lawsuit also names an unknown co-defendant as "John Doe." Once the lawsuit is initiated, the attorneys are then permitted to make discovery demands on the identified ISP to obtain records and information that will reveal the true identity of the ISP's member who has been sending the offending e-mail. Once "John Doe" has been identified with the help of his own ISP, the ISP is usually dismissed from the lawsuit. The plaintiff then proceeds against the wrongdoer as the only defendant.
    12. Re:China needs to understand the problem first by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Operating ponzi schemes or ripping senior citizens off with bogus roof repairs is not violent, either. But we put people that do those things in jail. It's not a victimless crime. Spam is simply another case of someone taking (resources and time) from another by fraud. So yes, imprisonment seems appropriate to me.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  40. Overzealous Spamguarding by Francis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, it wasn't that long ago that someone pointed out how hard it is to be removed from spam lists.

    That aside, I've always wondered why people get so upset over spam. It's not that hard to hit the delete button. I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button. Over the course of a year, I lose 30 minutes. That's not such a big deal to me.

    What does irritate me is I'm a victim of spamguards, on both ends. My web hosting service (yahoo) for unknown reasons is listed on 1 spam list. I've tried - there seems to be no way off the list. So, occasionally, I run into an institution which has walled me off.

    What makes me even more angry, is that my school where I did my undergrad, (UWaterloo) has implemented global "spam protection." And so now, I can't receive emails from some of my contacts.

    It's about the right to choose. I want to be able to control IF my email gets spam filtered. I'm willing to give up those 30 minutes a year in order to communicate with people. As someone pointed out, that's the beauty of the Internet. If I want spam filtering software, I'll install it myself. I don't want someone else to make that choice for me. We, as users, are losing our freedom too. I'm shocked that noone seems to notice or care.

    --

    --
    #include <malloc.h>
    free(your.mind);
    1. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Rhys · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's their system, it's their right to choose not yours. Run your own linux box and accept spam from who you choose. Until that point, bitch no more.

      --
      Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    2. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by metsfan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bandwidth isn't free. Spam takes up bandwidth. Sure, it doesn't take up a lot of yours, and you're probably paying by time, not by usage, but not everyone is. Major backbones get bogged down in it. AT&T's Worldnet e-mail had delays of up to a day because of spam. It gets expensive. It's not simply "deleting 10 messages a day," for anyone except the end user.

    3. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother, who is 76, gets a huge amount of spam in her mailbox, simply by being on innocuous email lists. This spam includes the most outrageous porno spamvertising ... This has upset her quite a bit. Strangely enough, she doesn't get porno flyers through snail mail. Do you really think this spam is acceptable? Is it really OK to get porno spam all the time and have to delete it?

      So far, that's just an argument for spam filtering on the personal level. The global argument is simply that spam is causing mail outages (AT&T Worldnet email was down or very slow for a day recently) - the world depends too much on email these days to let it get sludged up with spam.

    4. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Lish · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that hard to hit the delete button. I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button.

      That's all well and good, until you start getting your email on your cellphone or wireless PDA, and you're paying for every byte you receive. Then, we're talking real costs beyond just the time wasted.

      If you had to pay for every one of those 10 spams a day, would you be as willing to put up with it?

      --
      "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    5. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Skapare · · Score: 2

      More and more spam these days has clever subjects and/or sender names that make it harder to tell it's spam at first. Many people get high volumes of mail and can't spend the time to look at the subjects first, anyway. Your 1/2 second estimate is way off the mark. It's more like 10 seconds on average.

      I block almost all spam directed to me at the server, because there is so much. I never get it in my box at all. But based on the 34,000 delivery attempts from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2001, I would be spending more than a week every year just deleting spam. And that's if I stay awake 24x7. Looking at it another way, it's $18,000 out of my pocket if it were to take up my consulting time. So I let my servers do the deleting for me.

      But this is all different for different people. My email address has made the rounds and is on a lot of lists. Yes, it is about the right to choose and it's OK for different people to make different choices.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    6. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by mckyj57 · · Score: 1

      That aside, I've always wondered why people get so upset over spam. It's not that hard to hit the delete button. I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button. Over the course of a year, I lose 30 minutes. That's not such a big deal to me.


      I am trying to decide if you are dumb or a spammer trying the "just hit delete" thing yet again.

      If everyone just hits delete, and no one blocks, filters, or complains, spam climbs to even more obscene levels. Your "thirty minutes a year" turns into thirty minutes a month, then a week, then a day.....

      Bottom line is, spam needs to stop. The people who complain and blacklist are the only thing keeping spam down to even close to manageable levels. If everyone "just hit delete", email would be completely useless.

    7. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Francis · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. Seems I've touched a nerve, judging from the number of replies to this post. Let me clarify a few points.

      - I don't like spam anymore than regular old junk mail.
      - I do not have an @yahoo.com email. I give yahoo money, they host a website + mailserver for me. They do not have an open relay. Standard POP before SMTP validation. People who spam the system have their access removed.
      - I'm not suggesting that spam guards are not worthwhile. I just believe that they should be more configurable.
      eg. "If I have an email from someoneiknow@someopenrelay.com, let it through."
      "I don't get that much spam. Don't spam filter for me."
      What I am suggesting is that spam filtering is not a "one-size fits all" thing. I think everyone should be free to choose their own solution. I wish the people writing the spamguards would take this into account.
      - I completely agree that pornographics spam should be punishable by death. Regular spam should be illegal too. I'm just saying that (at least for some of us) the solution is worse than the problem. People seem to have taken some deep offence to spam, and persue it like some sort of ruthless religious crusade.
      - The reason I only get 10 or less spam mails a day, is because I don't give out my email address promiscuously. I don't post on the usenet with my real email address, and I don't reply to spam.
      - You know that 97% of the fiber running the backbones (at least in North America) is unlit? Due to buffering/queuing issues, TCP queuing algorithms work best if the network is 30% saturated. But, discussion of all that is beyond the scope of this thread ;)
      - The UWaterloo account I mentioned was a unix account. You can put in all sorts of wonderful spam guarding software into your .forward. So you can filter it before your mail client ever sees it, or put it off for later viewing.
      - I can understand ignorance. Pompous ignorance I cannot stand.

      --

      --
      #include <malloc.h>
      free(your.mind);
    8. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Hanno · · Score: 2

      I get about 10 spam mails a day

      Lucky you. More than 60% of my
      daily mail was spam before I
      started using very strict filtering.

      Seriously, I'm tired of the people telling me to
      "just hit delete".

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    9. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      It's about the right to choose. I want to be able to control IF my email gets spam filtered.

      So who's stopping you? You can run an SMTP server and do anything you want with your incoming mail.

      Or, if you're too lazy and stupid for that, just switch ISPs.

      But to demand that an arbitrary ISP should be forced to pipe spam through to you is as silly as demanding that the New York Times run the column your cousin writes for the Louisiana Southern Tech campus paper. You can choose to see that column if you want to, but not everyone is required to specifically enable it.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    10. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by cgenman · · Score: 2

      I used to get about 20 spams a day at my old address. I would also travel for weeks at a time. 20 deletes per day may not seem like much, but coming home after two weeks to 280 pieces of spam and one important message *somewhere* inside of it all is a real pain. If your ISP is incapable of the simple acts of configuring their servers to only transport mail for authorized people, and TOSing those people who do spam, then you need to find a better ISP. This is not just about the right to choose, but balancing that with the responsibility to choose wisely.

    11. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by raldanash · · Score: 1

      spam can be a problem when you start missing legit e-mails. i have a friend who got about 30-40 pieces of spam a day-and he deleted an e-mail from a close friend by mistake (her name was christina-he kept getting porno spam from a christina with a 'wet pussy that's hot & ready' so he confused them) that was a mass-mailing about her mom dying. the next time they met (a few weeks later at a mutual friend's) he acted like nothing had happened and was pretty embarrassed. anyway, spam can be really fucked up (granted-he should have switched accounts-but some people will keep sending e-mail to your old account)

      --
      NO gods, NO governments, NO [OPTION]....
    12. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by bero-rh · · Score: 2

      Consider the situation for someone else.

      I receive roughly 500 spam messages a day, partially because my email address is and has to be public (I want to receive bug reports and patches for my software), and partially because I'm on a couple of mailing lists, some of which are even gated to spamnet (formerly known as usenet, yet another formerly valuable resource spammers managed to destroy completely).

      Furthermore, since I'm in Europe, I've had to pay for my net connectivity (yes, including receiving spam) per minute until June last year [and people outside the big cities still don't have the option not to pay per minute].

      I'd say in total, spammers have cost me more than 200 hours and roughly $100 just for the year 2001.

      And since laws aren't sufficient, there's not too much I can do about it ("Sure you can sue them for $500, but you'll have to cover court and attorney fees, approximatley $50000.")

      Furthermore, some spam is really disgusting - e.g. last week I received a piece of spam just this morning that contained a meta refresh tag that would have redirected me to a porn site automatically if I were using some stupid HTML email client.

      I reported them to the police for probably sending pornographic material to children (because spam will always get to kids), and their response was along the lines of "just hit delete".

      --
      This message is provided under the terms outlined at http://www.bero.org/terms.html
    13. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by andrewski · · Score: 1

      "It's about the right to choose."

      Damn straight. As more and more spammers choose to forge headers and make use of open relays, there are more people who are going to choose to deny them the fruits of their labor.

      Maybe you should choose an isp that isn't spam friendly, you could send e-mail home to mom again.

      Anyway, as 2/3 of my own spam comes from Taiwan, China, and Korea (oddly enough I don't get any Japanese spam), and seeing as how I haven't gotten a single legit e-mail from ANY of those countries, I have started blocking all of them.

      Have fun in your ghetto internet, east asia! You will soon be all alone unless you straighten up and fly right.

    14. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      If you had to pay for every one of those 10 spams a day


      Ain't no "if" about it, unless his ISP has a magic money machine to pay its bandwidth costs.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    15. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Snowfox · · Score: 2
      It's not that hard to hit the delete button. I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button.
      That's all well and good, until you start getting your email on your cellphone or wireless PDA, and you're paying for every byte you receive. Then, we're talking real costs beyond just the time wasted.
      Even more importantly, you shouldn't have to sit and tap delete. If I'm spending half a second evaluating whether each message is legitimate or not, it's entirely probable that I'm going to accidentally delete the wrong message.

      Not receiving or answering the wrong email could do serious harm to my livelihood. It could result in an unmet project requirement. In an extreme case, it could cost me my job.

    16. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From a .sig:

      "You want us to hit delete. A blocking list is basically a diesel delete key. A blocking list is the bulk delete response to unwanted bulk email. When we use a blocking list, we *are* hitting delete, as you ask us to do. Why do you object?"

    17. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • It's not that hard to hit the delete button [...] What does irritate me is [that as a Yahoo! user] I'm a victim of spamguards [...] It's about the right to choose

      I do take the point that filtering breaks the traditional model of the 'net, but that "traditional" model was largely set up RFC's that came out of academic institutions, and now that so many of these institutions (as you say) are filtering, perhaps the basic model has changed. We've moved away from an assumption of innocence, simply because when it met the cold reality of the Average Human Being, it became economically and socially unsustainable.

      But that's not what you're talking about at all. You're only interested in your freedoms. Are you saying that you don't have the right to choose to pay for a mail service that uses your money to pay to handle unfiltered spam traffic?

      Of course not, you're on Yahoo!. What you're saying is that you want a completely free-as-in-beer service, but that you want them to pick up the bill for handling spam to protect your free-as-in-speech experience.

      Sounds to me like you're not pro-choice or pro free-speech at all. You're pro-beer. Last I checked, 'net access wasn't a right, not is it enshrined that it should be free-as-in-beer.

      Incidentally, I put myself through university in the early 90's, when the net was free as in speech, but definitely not as in beer. If you want a free as in speech 'net experience, you can still do what I did, and choose to pay for access to it. If you choose not to pay, then you're hardly in a position to complain that you're not getting your money's worth.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    18. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by arkham6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its worse than you think. Just for yourself, thats one thing, but when you look at it in another light, its far far worse.

      Lets say you work for a large company, with say 10,000 people. 10,000 people * 10 spams a day (low number, but lets go with that for now) = 100,000 spam emails a day. Thats a lot of spam. Now, lets say that each spam is about 10kb. 10kb * 100,000 spams = 1000000kb, or (1000000/1024) 976 megabytes of spam. Almost a gig of spam a day.

      Now your company does not have a free pipeline to the internet. Lets assume for the sake of argument that they have to pay by the meg. Lets (wildly) assume that your company has to pay 15 cents per megabyte of traffic through their ISP. .15 * 976 = $146.40. That may not sound that much, but over the course of a year that makes out to be about $53,436.

      Of course, thats just in internet feed charges. Assume that it takes the average person one second to read and delete a spam. With an average of 10 spams a day, thats ((10,000 * 10)/60) 1666.67 minutes per day, or 27.78 hours per day wasted on spam. Say the average person makes $20 dollars an hour, or about $40,000 a year. 27.78 * 20=$555.56 a day in lost time. Over a year, thats $202,777.78 in time lost to spam. Ouch.

      So all those penis enlarger and diet spams are costing your company $256,000 a year. Multiply that by all the companies in the world that get spam, and you have a major financial burden.

    19. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      Why do we get upset over SPAM?

      PR0N!, that's why. (BTW: I guess I qualify as an "Old fart" ) Everytime one of my kids/Monsters wants to check to see if they have email from one of their friends, I have to D/L the mail first, and delete ALL the junk, including stuff that is patently illegal in this country. Daddy? Why is that lady playing with that dog that way?

      It's not just 30 minutes a year, it's 3650 minutes a YEAR!

    20. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Isofarro · · Score: 1

      That aside, I've always wondered why people get so upset over spam. It's not that hard to hit the delete button.

      The "Just Hit Delete" argument does not hold water. The spam problem is more than just cluttering up an inbox. It is called spam for a very good reason (based on the Monty Python sketch where Vikings were drowning out conversation with their Spam song). With spam on the increase, you have a less and less chance of being able to send email to and receive email from others. Yeah, you'll get your fair dose of spam, but that's about it.

      What happens with spam is that it rises in volume (pun intended - both loudness and quantity), which then blocks out legitimate conversation. Notice that spam runs tend to be in the thousands, and with lists of 50 million email addresses - whether valid or not - it takes up a significant portion of bandwidth (and even more so on non-existant email addresses).

      Once the spam email arrives in your inbox, the most significant damage has already been done. Network congestions, mail servers falling down - there is a serious risk of legitimate email not being delivered. How much legit mail have you not received - how do you measure that?

      It's about the right to choose. I want to be able to control IF my email gets spam filtered

      Absolutely. You have the right to choose - but how do you get to choose what email you want to receive. You have the choice between a spam and a legit email - only one can get through. Surely you'd want the legit email? So why can't I have that choice? By filtering out spam, there's a much better chance of my preferred legit email getting through.

      All that blocking open relays does is a tradeoff. I'm happy for my service provider to do this, so I continue my subscription to them, because it results in a tradeoff that the mail I want will get delivered - it is my email box.

      Spam is destructive, both financially and architecturally. Its a lot more than mere line-items in your mailbox. It is the fundamental problem that will prevent the web from being a place of free expression and collaboration.

      From past experience, advocates of the "Just Hit Delete" argument don't understand the real damage spam causes. They just see the list of entries in an inbox, they don't see the vast quantities of email that don't arrive.

      Hence the advice of running your own mail server is probably the only way you'll understand the seriousness of the problem.

    21. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the Library School I attended, the server administrator has found a way to cut down spam dramatically.

      He has folks send him a copy of the spam as soon as they receive -- with a Faculty and student body of several hundred, he get new ones early.

      Blocks go up immediately, the goal being to prevent on-going and future spam. Result is several thousand messages can get blocked over a day, whereupon the spammer seems to cut them from their list.

      Next step is to automate this currently "people intensive" method -- something like bouncing the message to an internal address. Saving the bounced message, along with the local decision maker, adds a level of openness and social control to prevent abuse. I'm sure there will be problems (i.e., can't cut local addresses even if the spam source is a server on campus), but so far the system is working,

      Involving people is almost always going to be needed as machines and heuristics are quite "bad" approaches to assessing content (for example, some do receive foreign languge mail that displays in Japanese, Chinese, etc.).

      Won't work for a huge organization, but it can be useful when dealing with a group of cohesive and reasonable folk.

    22. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by kindbud · · Score: 2

      But to demand that an arbitrary ISP should be forced to pipe spam through to you is as silly as demanding that the New York Times run the column your cousin writes for the Louisiana Southern Tech campus paper. You can choose to see that column if you want to, but not everyone is required to specifically enable it.

      Faulty anology - very faulty. What if he subscribes to the email newsletter for his cousin's column, but his ISP blocks his cousin's college's mail server?

      Do you really claim it is unreasonable to expect "any arbitrary ISP" to deliver email to you that you had asked to be sent? Is that really your claim?

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    23. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by JasonAsbahr · · Score: 1

      Right. A year ago, I got five spams a day. Now it's 10 spams a day. What next? 20 spams next year, 40 spams the year after that, 80, 160, 320...

    24. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by ktakki · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button.


      Only 10 a day? You must be new.

      One of my mail accounts, a Hotmail address I've had since before the MSFT buyout, seems to show up on every single "20,000,000 Guaranteed E-mail Addresses!" CD-ROM out there. Hang on, I'll open it up...

      1513 junk e-mail messages since 28 Feb. 1513 in a week.. On top of this, there are at least 150 that have bypassed the junk filter. MSFT regularly shuts down this account because the volume of spam puts it over quota. Because of spam, this account is effectively trashed.

      Just hit delete. Just kiss my shiny metal...

      k.
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    25. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and what about the day when you get over 1000 copies of the same piece of spam? you can't
      send or recieve mail until you delete them all because even at 4 K a piece we're up to almost 4 megs. this has happened to me about a dozen times in the last 8 months (one day i recieved 3000 copies of the same message, header's etc...)

    26. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 2

      No need to re-invent the wheel.
      You've just described Vipul's razor

      -- Spam Wolf - the best vaporware on the net.

    27. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by phillymjs · · Score: 1

      It's about the right to choose. I want to be able to control IF my email gets spam filtered.

      Then register your own domain name, and run your own mailserver, carefully set up so as not to be an open relay. That's what I did. I got tired of having no control over the most basic yet most crucial aspect of internet service. I also had a lame ISP, @Home, that was plagued by mail outages and became a spammer haven. So I took matters into my own hands-- I switched to DSL, and now I've got a very reliable mailserver running in my spare bedroom.

      ~Philly

    28. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by jchristopher · · Score: 1
      That aside, I've always wondered why people get so upset over spam. It's not that hard to hit the delete button. I get about 10 spam mails a day. It takes about 1/2 a second to read the subject, realize it's spam, and hit the delete button. Over the course of a year, I lose 30 minutes. That's not such a big deal to me.

      You're obviously not a dialup user. And at 10 a day, you receive just ONE TENTH of the amount of spam of several people I know.

      Many folks can only get a 28.8 dialup connection to the internet. Downloading, reading, and deleting 50 spams a day can easily take 10-15 minutes DAILY. That's 3,600 minutes a year. I don't know about you, but I don't have that kind of free time.

      To make matters worse, many spammers are now starting to send HTML and Flash email. On a slow connection, it can take 20 seconds just to download a single piece of email!

      Please remember that not everyone is lucky enough to be sitting on a high-speed university pipe.

    29. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by catfood · · Score: 1
      Even more importantly, you shouldn't have to sit and tap delete. If I'm spending half a second evaluating whether each message is legitimate or not, it's entirely probable that I'm going to accidentally delete the wrong message.

      I get about a hundred spams a day on average, a bit more on weekends, so I automatically filter as much as I reasonably can.

      Just a couple weeks ago, I got email from an old college pal who hasn't reached out in fourteen years. He had a Yahoo address that didn't look anything like his name, and he picked a pretty lame subject line too. I was this >< close to deleting the message unread, manually, since it hadn't hit the filters but looked rather spammish.

      Given my line of work and his, there's a decent possibility we may actually get to do some mutually profitable (i.e., no jokes, it's not MLM) business together in the near future. But even if that doesn't work out, I'd been looking for this guy for years; his name is so common and he lives in such a large city that a directory search would have been pointless.

      Now tell me spam doesn't have real consequences.

    30. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Harik · · Score: 1
      Hey, you obviously don't get enough spam.

      As someone who's been on the net since '94, I get over 50x as much spam as valid email.

      So, hit "delete" 50 times, read one mail, delete another 50 times...

      Please, do me a favor and call me on it. I'll have my spamfilters forward to you through the list of open-relays that I've got blocked. I'll even be nice and only send you each message ONCE rather then the 5-6 times I get it.

      My spambox gets more traffic then the linux-kernel list. I'd be happy to share.

      --Dan

    31. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by gonaddespammed.com · · Score: 1

      you don't work for an ISP do you.
      spam is the biggest bitch.

      ignorant MS admins are mostly at fauly where I work. We stomp on them. It's good most the time.

      If every ISP took responsbility for its customers action (ie enforced rules) the world would be a better place.

    32. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, the sheer amount of spam your ISP has to deal with (its probably reasonable to say that close to half of all email is spam, but I don't know the real numbers, but spam is almost always several times larger than "normal" emails anyway) result in higher costs for (a) disk space, (b) bandwidth, (c) software (e.g. spam-blocking software) and (d) extra people to handle all of the above mean higher costs for your ISP all round, those costs simply get passed right on down to the consumer. So directly, you're paying more to receive spam, period. These problems are especially compounded in a case like, where I'm in South Africa, bandwidth costs are very high for ISPs and thus also end-users, and our local telecomms monopology charges per-minute that you're online. So directly, I not only have higher ISP costs, I've got higher phone bills, and I wait easily up to several *minutes* more *every day* to retrieve +/- 10 spam mails a day (I value my time very highly, it is essentially the only resource we have that we have no control over, and when its gone, its gone forever).

  41. A Possible Explanation.... by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

    For why asian toilets make you squat:

    Here we have a country that has made an industry out of filtering out evil western thought, yet complains when we filter out their evil spam.

    Perhaps they install their toilets the same way they do their firewalls - backwards.

    -JT

  42. Korea anyone? by JPriest · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'd say about 80% of my spam is from Korean schools. Here is a post from an abuse NG with a possible explanation for it. Myself and many others have tried a # of times to contact some of these schools for the last few months or so with no success.

    Subject: Re: Korean Schools Proxy Project?

    From Joel:
    "> It is possible that Appleton, Wisconsin, High School has an open connect proxy on port 3128 and the Tuscaloosa Unified School District has an anonymous mail relay.
    But, apparently, one group wired every K-12 school in South Korea and they made the same goddam error EVERYWHERE."

    RE: from Rob
    Thanks for explaining this, Joel. Somebody sent me a couple dozen spams (morts, credit card, work at home) in the last week, each relayed through a different Korean elementary school. None bothers to record the originating IP. Amazing.

    A letter to the ambassador is in order.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  43. Re:Chinese racial slurs by PoshSpod · · Score: 1

    And for the record, we are, at least in the South, Gwai-Lo. It means something like Ghost-Man or White-Devil depending on the translation from the Cantonese.

    Needless to say, like all good insults (the elephant logo for the Republicans and the word 'Tory' in the UK) it has been adopted by the ex-pats out here as an affictionate nick-name.

    --

    This is my sig.

  44. WTF? by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    "The majority of the junk mail (is) not created in China, so why (should) they block mail from China?" said Zeng Xiaozhen, a professor at Jilin University

    Because it's being relayed through your servers, Zeng.

    (Don't you just *hate* it when people just don't get basic concepts like this?)

    Mr. Xiaozhen, Please take an hour, RTFM and close your open relays. Tell your friends to do the same. Until then, get yourself a Hotmail account - you're gonna need it.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:WTF? by Technician · · Score: 2

      Hotmail account may be useless to him. They may be blocking IP packets from China. ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Mr. Xiaozhen, Please take an hour, RTFM and
      > close your open relays. Tell your friends to
      > do the same. Until then, get yourself a
      > Hotmail account - you're gonna need it.

      Might not do a whole lotta good. Many mail
      admins routinely block HotMail and other "free"
      email services, as well.

  45. Run over the insecure servers with tanks by marvinglenn · · Score: 1
    from the article:

    "The majority of the junk mail (is) not created in China, so why (should) they block mail from China?" said Zeng Xiaozhen, a professor at Jilin University in the northeastern province of Jilin.

    Obviously starting out on a clue-by-four free foundation.

    He said spam was a global issue and China should make a law to punish creators of junk e-mail.

    Just what we (anyone who isn't China) want... China violating our sorverignty with their laws. Well, I may be open to extraditing a few select spammers.

    Peter Lovelock, director of Beijing-based consultancy MFC Insight, said the National People's Congress might be swayed to pass laws calling for more rigorous management of Internet-linked servers in China in order to avoid international embarrassment.

    Now here's something with a real clue. Them passing laws on their own citizens to secure their own computers. Maybe they'll run over the clueless admins and insecure servers with tanks.

    I still think the private sector solution is just fine, though. "deny 202.0.0.0/8" A few lines like that seems to solve the problem.

    Of course, the amount of time it will take to be delisted should be equal to the amount of time it took them to fix the problem. (IANS) See ya in 2010, the year we make contact.

    --
    The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
    1. Re:Run over the insecure servers with tanks by JohnBE · · Score: 1

      This is interesting because IIRC the negotiations between China and the WTO (17th September 2001), concluded with China saying:

      "China will provide non-discriminatory treatment to all WTO Members. All foreign individuals and enterprises, including those not invested or registered in China, will be accorded treatment no less favourable than that accorded to enterprises in China with respect to the right to trade."

      "Within three years of accession all enterprises will have the right to import and export all goods and trade them throughout the customs territory with limited exceptions."

      "price controls will not be used for purposes of affording protection to domestic industries or services providers."

      Does blocking spam count as anti-competative or discriminatory treatment of foreign compentitors?

      --
      e4 e5
    2. Re:Run over the insecure servers with tanks by Skapare · · Score: 2

      202.0.0.0/8 contains IP assignments to many other countries. Why not go get your own list of what IP addresses actually are assigned to China.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  46. and then... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    ...charge the cost of the bullet to the spammer's family! :)

    I like it. It's...elegant.

    1. Re:and then... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      charge the cost of the bullet to the spammer's family!

      Hey, just charge it to the person at the top of the list (then write your own name on the bottom...)

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:and then... by mazachan · · Score: 1

      nonononono... what happens when your name reaches the top? Just put someone else's name there..

  47. Then do something about it by Skapare · · Score: 2

    It's also unfair that Chinese mail servers leave the door open for spammers, whether in China or outside, to send huge volumes of junk. It's also unfair that people like yourself who live in China are not doing more to get the problem fixed. The news article this whole thread started from does indicate some people are recognizing a problem, although they still don't seem to fully understand it. Maybe it will be hard for you to get the Chinese government to crack down on the open relays. It won't be any easier for someone from the United States to do so.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  48. That understates the problem by phr2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    First of all, deleting a spam message takes much more than 1/2 second if you count starting up the mailer every time you see the "you have mail" message and it turns out to be newly arrived spam.

    Second, if you get 10/day, you actually don't have much of a spam problem compared to usenet regulars etc. I get hundreds of pieces of spam per day which is less than a lot of other people get. I manage to filter about 75% of it but the rest still takes much more than 30 minutes/year to deal with.

    Third, even if it's just 30 minutes a year, which 30 minutes is it? A pinprick to the butt is much less annoying than one to the eyeball. An incoming email is an interruption almost like a phone call, breaking your train of thought and interfering with your work. A 5-second interruption several times a day is much worse than, say, no spam at all during the entire year except you're required to spend 2 hours on April 15 (tax day) looking at spam.

    My filters get rid of lots of spam but occasionally catch a legitimate message, so once a week or so I spend a few minutes looking over the filtered messages. Batching them like that reduces the spam annoyance factor a lot, but it destroys the immediacy of the legitimate email.

    The reason yahoo is on spam lists isn't unknown--it's obvious. Insane amounts of spam comes from yahoo addresses and has no signs of slowing. The obvious solution for you is get an address from a more responsible provider.

    1. Re:That understates the problem by Kiwi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The reason yahoo is on spam lists isn't unknown--it's obvious. Insane amounts of spam comes from yahoo addresses and has no signs of slowing. The obvious solution for you is get an address from a more responsible provider.
      Because of the way SMTP works, this is not the case at all. Here is how it works: When a SMTP connection is made to send an email, the person sending the email can put any old email address as the return address. In addition, many ISP have set up spam filters which require the return address of a piece of mail to come from a domain that resolves. This encourages spammers to put in a forged return address, such as name@yahoo.com.

      The other advantage of name@yahoo.com style email addresses is that the email address is more likely to look legitimate to many users of the internet.

      However, these emails are not coming from yahoo.com; usually the Yahoo address in question points to a Yahoo address that does not exist. What the spammers do is this:

      • Send a forged email which has a false yahoo.com return address.
      • Find an open relay somewhere on the internet to spew the email in question.
      • Send off the email to zillions of netizens.
      • Laugh as Yahoo instead of the spammer responsible for the spam gets the majority of the complaints.
      As a matter of fact, Yahoo has a system which stops people from automatically getting new Yahoo email addresses.

      Now, as it turns out, SpamAssassin is smart enough to see whether a return email address with yahoo.com in it is forged; one needs to look at the "received:" headers to determine where the email really came from.

      In conclusion: Yahoo is not in any way, shape, or form responsible for spam which has a yahoo.com return address on it; perhaps spammers should start spewing out large quantities of email with your domain as the return address on it so you know what it is like to be falsely accused of being a spam haven.

      Now, if only DNS had an "outgoing MX exchange" record which made this kind of filtering easier.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

  49. perhaps... by smash · · Score: 1
    ...they should do what everybody else has to, and secure their frigging e-mail servers.

    For god's sake, its not difficult, and it will likely save them money.

    IF the spam is coming from the ISP's customer base then they have grounds for terminating the account(s) for breaching (spelling?) their terms of service.

    smash(*sigh* ... eta from new email address to receiving pr0n spam = ~2weeks)

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  50. Why not default to SMTP blocking at ISPs? by mosschops · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Recently I was helping diagnose a problem with mail delivery to a friends machine. It soon became apparent that incoming connections to the SMTP port were being blocked. After contacting the ISP it was confirmed that it was a default anti-spam measure, but they'd be willing to test the server to ensure relaying was disabled, and then unblock the port.

    If Chinese ISPs were /forced/ to do the same thing it'd make clearing up the mess a lot easier. Legitimate, non-relaying servers would be opened back up, and it would leave the accidental servers inaccesible to spammers around the world. In fact, wouldn't this be a sensible policy for ISPs around the world?

    1. Re:Why not default to SMTP blocking at ISPs? by joostje · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my ADSL ISP takes this route, that is, half-way.
      They don't allow incomming port 25, no matter what I do.
      Of cource, in their policy they state they don't block any ports... So, I'm switching to another ISP.

  51. Re:Korea porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget it...you get stronger pips on the today show.

    Their idea of porn is a suggestive pose by a styrofoam clothes dummie.

  52. alternative solution... by smash · · Score: 3, Funny
    They want their own network that they can control, censor, and make inaccessible from the outside?

    /me hands china a few subnets... 192.168.0.0/16, 172.16.0.0/20, and 10.0.0.0/8 :P

    smash

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  53. Wonder how bad spamming in China is? PLEASE HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got such email once a while:

    From: 1@2.com
    To: my@email.com
    Subject: Email Address CD

    Looking for database of great business opportunities?
    1.7 millions Hong Kong and 1.2 millions worldwide Email Addresses.
    Latest 1.7 millions Hong Kong Email Adresses as of Feb 2002
    900 thousands China Email Addresses, frequent update!
    As followed(no duplication):

    hotmail.com 700 thousands
    hongkong.com 330 thousands
    netviagator.com 170 thousands
    36.com 100 thousands
    tom.com 70 thousands
    yahoo.com.hk 50 thousands
    packfic.net.hk 50 thousands
    hkabc.net 50 thousands
    hutchcity.com 50 thousands
    Others 50 thousands

    CD contains email addresses in .TXT format and in .DBF format for storing FAX and companies name.
    Hong Kong email addresses are sorted by servers, other are sorted by year, profession and country.
    Others include (a list of many countries)

    CD comes with programs automatically delivery 50 thousands emails per hour!

    If you are interested please call (852) 90305831 Mr. Siu. (District code of Hong Kong is 852)
    "Will not answer calls without caller display"
    Transaction can be done at Kowloon Tong KCR station, 10 mins arrival, or other KCR stations, or other places. Can also hand delivery to your place.

    http://www.taiposiu.bobsville.com/

    (Note: above is a direct tranlation from Chinese. Is that anything I could do to stop him? Note there's no law here against him doing that. :/)

    PLEASE MOD ME UP SO THAT EVERYBODY CAN SEE THIS!

  54. you can't legislate all your problems by PrometheuSx11 · · Score: 1

    There is no way the government of china (or
    anyone) can effectively legislate and enforce
    anti spam laws. When lazy admins find them-
    selves getting their whole subnets blocked
    by everyone else because of spam, maybe they'll
    fix their stupid mail servers!
    This is a classic example of free market/natural
    law in action. No one wants to limit china's
    connectivity, in fact, its more advantageous
    (theoretically) to be as connected as possible.
    And when they clean up their act, everyone will
    start playing nice again.
    Trying to write laws to counter these negative
    reactions to irresponsible networking will only
    reinforce the problem.

    --
    --------------------- Turn evil by smiling.
    1. Re:you can't legislate all your problems by Skapare · · Score: 2

      The problem is a huge number of mail servers in China are coming online wide open for relaying. China is just in the past couple of years moving quickly to the internet. When the US started it's big growth many years ago, spamming was less sophisticated, and fewer people were involved. And the US didn't have to deal with a huge online base of foreign spammers wanting to relay through. Most new servers installed by someone for the first time on the net even in the US were open relays. The problem for China is they are just now doing all the internet expansion, and there are now a whole lot more spammers outside of the country taking advantage of the openings. Combine that with China now allowing businesses as opposed to the prior state operated socialism, there are many Chinese people wanting to find some way to get rich in business, without really understanding how to do it since it has been suppressed for so long (other than Hong Kong).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  55. Ethikul biznizmen by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 3, Informative
    None of the Asian countries above have responded to spam complaints. It's not just a language problem either. I get (or used to get before my spam filters went up) technical requests (in English) from Asia as the result of USENET postings and FAQs I wrote.

    This phenomenon is known as the "ethikul biznisman" problem. Buy a PC in a shop in China, and the salesman's English will be quite adequate, and he will also understand what you are saying. But bring it back one week later because of a defect, and he no longer understands a word of what you say, and his accent goes to hell.

    As long as they want something from you, or they want to sell something, no language barriers exists. But as soon as you want sth from them, or have a complaint, then all bets are off.

    Best include a link to the above-mentioned People's daily article (translation) in your complaint mail. They do understand your language, but they might not (yet) do understand the consequences of their (non)acts.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
    1. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by BJH · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see the /. crowd is as open-minded and non-judgemental as ever... *sigh*

    2. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry to say that it is partly true. Atleast when it comes to S. Korea.

      It is very unlikely that you get an answer if you post a question on a bulletin board in English, while a question in Korean usually is answered in a matter of hours.

      The same goes for e-mail. I have sent atleast 10 e-mails to govermental instititions, universities and companies without getting a single answer. When my korean friend helps me, I get a answer every time.

      My resoning is that they probably filter all e-mail with english as spam ;-)

      Calling them works well too...

      ---------
      Longwinded and slightly off topic... but true...

    3. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      As an aside I concur that the influx of "immigints" from asia is big royal pain in the arse.

      I'm sorry, but if you're going to move to another country learn how to speak the bloody language first. Having to put up with 15 asians in my english class is a huge pain in the ass because they talk so incoherently.

      They also [from my experience in my classes] have a tendency to try and memorize alot of things. In one of my classes we had to give short 5 mins presentations on a "mechanism". Basically to show off you know how to break something down and present it. Most people did simple things [I did a game pad] since the only thing that counts is that you have the steps there [not the content of the steps].

      Not to say everyone is evil. I've met nice people from all corners of the earth. I'm just saying when people get angry at these types I can understand where its comming from.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we should just drop a nuke on those stupid fucking yellow slope head skum gooks

    5. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 3, Informative
      Calling them works well too...

      Not always. I've had a problem with a joe-jobbing spammer that was sending spam with my name in the From line, and was spamvertising sites in China. Complaining (via e-mail) to the abuse@ and whois addresses of the various involved providers did yield exactly no response. So I called. The phone got picked up by a person whose only reaction was to say "hooee! hooee! hooee!" into the phone every now and then (this went on for a couple of minutes... yes, this was a pay call...). He did not even have the sense to ask around in his office whether there was any English speaking colleague around. A company running an international business (which an ISP is, by definition) should at least take care to list phone numbers of English speaking personnel into the relevant contact databases (whois).

      However, after I started forwarding all the joe-job bounces back to the abuse and whois addresses (over a thousand per day...), suddenly I started getting back responses written in a very adequate English ;-)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    6. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      I know it was modded down as flamebait, but the guy's telling the truth. I had this happen when I bought a laptop from a small company. I tried to return it and his accent was HORRIBLE. Sorry, but it was. Plus he was a prick and wouldn't let me return the laptop.
      I try and keep an open mind about different cultures, but in the end, they keep pissing me off like this. So I'm not racist, just disenfranchised. :( I wish it weren't that way.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    7. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah it's almost as hard to understand as those damn brits, irishmen, german and scottish people.

    8. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by abolith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had this propblem when I tried to return a new laptop I bought (it was a mega POS) but the guy could suddenly not speak english, so I made it appear like I gave up and was just looking arround the store. so he started yapping to his buddy in Japanese (yes i can speak it decently) about how dumb and clusless I was. Well after a few minutes of this I walked back up to the counter and asked in his own language if I could return it now that he was done insulting me.

      The look of shock is one that i will never forget!! I also got my money back. :)

      --
      if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
    9. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by jellybear · · Score: 1

      What does giving a 5 min presentation have to do with foreigners memorizing a lot of things?

    10. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a paragraph is missing somewhere in between. Lemme guess: all the furriners recited the exact same presentation, the one that the teacher gave as an example?

    11. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      get your slander right

      That'd be slang, not slander. "slander" is landshark slang for "vicious lie damaging someone's reputation".

    12. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm as hostile to racism as anyone - but my girlfriend's Japanese, and she does this trick to get out of traffic tickets and other situations she doesn't want to be in. Her English is usually fine, but when the cop pulls up, it's tears and accent all the way. Same thing with telemarketers and annoying coworkers.

      Heck, I'm almost fluent in Spanish, travel there for work frequently (and let me assure the Americans, more immigrants to the US speak some English than American businessmen abroad speak whatever language of the region their in - your complaint is hypocritical), and when I'm dealing with people in Latin America that I don't want to deal with (pushy salespeople, for example) it's suddenly "no HA-blow ee-SPA-knoll."

    13. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you buy the laptop in China?
      The returning-somethin'-if-you-don't-like-it practice is not as universal as you think.
      The only reason most merchants in the US let you return a merchandise is that the price has been jacked up enough to absorb the handling of a few returned items. I hope you got a better deal on the laptop than you would've in the US. If so.. take the bad with the good and calm the heck down. (if you paid more.. well.. you had your reasons. :)
      By the way.. maybe it would help to understand the meaning of the word "disenfranchised" first b4 using it again.

    14. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be worse...

      They could be here for 400 years and learn nothing.

    15. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      I was in a hurry [couldn't finish post] to get to class [yes note the irony]. Sorry about that.

      ok what happened was a few of them did full blown huge presentations on various things but failed to meet the smallest requisits. In turn while they gave technically interesting presentations they missed the basic requirements and failed [this is an English class].

      My point was that in order to impress people they tend to try and memorize huge blocks of facts. Instead they should just try to master English more [e.g. not speak their native tungue so much at home so they get practice.]. Might seem "unfair" but this is what we call reality. In Canada we are English and French primarily [mostly English where I live]. So if you only speak a Chinese language you're not going to fit in well no matter how well intentioned you are.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    16. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by Denny · · Score: 1

      > I'm not racist, just disenfranchised

      Disenfranchised means you're not allowed to vote, if I recall correctly...

      Disaffected, maybe?

      Regards,
      Denny

      --
      Police State UK - news and
    17. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      why thank you! one can only try to do his best! ;-)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    18. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      that might be because basically not a single soul there speaks english.... backpacked around S. korea for a month and THe main way of doing oneself understood was body language and pointing on words in LP... marvelous country though...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    19. Re:Ethikul biznizmen by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      I bought the laptop from a small company based out of California. I talked to several different people there, not one of which didn't have an accent. It was heavy, but I could understand them and they could understand me. I ordered it on, say, the first, it arrived on the 7th, and it was broken on the 31st. There was a 30 day money-back guarantee. I was able to get it serviced under the 1 year warrantee, but they wouldn't take it back. It worked for 2 more months. Then it broke again. It was the same thing both times (the display started flickering on and off). I got it serviced. Then it worked for about a year. Then the display died...

      --
      Synergy is your friend
  56. Ethical Delimma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really torn here... I really want to be angry at China for thier horrible human rights violations... but something inside me wants to root for anyone who is actually willing to follow through on the "bullet to spammers head" threat...

    Why does the world have to be so complicated?

  57. Effective? by caluml · · Score: 1

    And - doesn anyone really buy mortgages, or take loans from people that advertise their services in that way?

    Sure, I'll borrow £150,000 to buy my house from some no-name across the other side of the world.

  58. It is not a joke. by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Hopefully, the Chinese government will take the kind of firm action against spammers, that other governments hesitate on for misunderstood humanitarian reasons ("humanitarian" concerns should not apply to non-humans, such as spammers).

    And feel free to moderate me down as flamebait, but I have seen to many virtual communities be destroyed because of spam for this to be anything but a heart-felt opinion.

  59. Get a Yahoo Account.... by billstewart · · Score: 2, Troll

    There are lots of free web-based email servers out there, like yahoo.com. Get an account there to send mail from.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Get a Yahoo Account.... by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should read up on China's Internet restrictions.

      All web based email is banned. You just can't go to the sites. Many political sites are banned. Many TOPICS are banned. They're on the cutting edge of scanning email for inappropriate words. Which is amazing considering email/internet is packet based.

      Why do you think there was the big crack down on cyber-cafes? Did they ever let them open up again?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Get a Yahoo Account.... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
      All web based email is banned. You just can't go to the sites.

      So, if you're fed up of China based spam, just set up a public webmail service. Or just a proxy tunnel to yahoo.com. After that, the Chinese government will just firewall your netblock, and presto, no more sino-spam!

      --
      Say no to software patents.
    3. Re:Get a Yahoo Account.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Troll"?

      Oh, right, this is what happens when someone gets pissed at someone else and marks their complete works as "Troll".

  60. Censorship Firewalls & Spammer Blocking - Sigh by billstewart · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It's really sad. China goes to all this work to suppress free speech and free thought for their people by hiring big American companies to build censorship firewalls to limit their access. Does that work? We can't tell, because the flood of spam that they *are* shipping out drowns the real speech by Chinese people, and is encouraging far more sites in the free world to block Chinese email than the Chinese corrupt oppressive government was successful in doing. Open email relays are easily used to forward spam, but are also useful in evading censors. It's really shameful.

    Of course, if I wanted to put my Tinfoil Conspiracy Hat on, I'd say it was collusion between the unelected George Bush and the thugs in China's government to prevent cooperation between our democratic-leaning peoples, or some such rot. And if either side wanted to accomplish that, this might be the most effective way to do it. Truth is unfortunately stranger than fiction....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  61. Market forces are the right approach by billstewart · · Score: 3, Interesting
    We don't need the Chinese government to pass some law to make this happen - the free market *can* force them to do so, as the big Chinese ISPs get told "if you want to send mail to the outside world, you'll need to make your users block open email relays" - not told by the government, but by their service providers and by the big email sites in the outside world and the flood of bouncemails they get. And most of them will get the clue, and some of the rest of them, mainly smaller ones, will fail to get the clue and fail to communicate outside and fail at business. Or they'll get trashed by 31337 haX0rz having fun beating them up .

    Of course, it *would* help if somebody would translate a bunch of anti-spam configuration information into Chinese and Korean.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Market forces are the right approach by Carmody · · Score: 1, Troll
      We don't need the Chinese government to pass some law to make this happen - the free market *can* force them to do so


      Just click your heels together three times and say, "There's no force like the free market... there's no force like the free market... there's no force like the free market..." And then all of our problems will go away and we will live in a Utopia just as good as Karl Marx's, but better because there are no unrealistic communists in it.

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Market forces are the right approach by mcdade · · Score: 1

      That's what babelfish is for!

      If i get a message from some one in another language, I don't just toss it out, i copy it into babelfish and try and figure out what they want. If it requires a response, i make a simple reply and bablefish it but also send the english version..

      i do suppose that if i got all those weird asian characters, it won't works so well. Maybe the admin on the the other side is sitting there thinking 'what the hell is all this garbage??.. delete!'

    3. Re:Market forces are the right approach by billstewart · · Score: 2
      I'm not blindly assuming that they get fixed by magic - the free market means us voluntarily getting together and kicking their asses if they don't clean up their act, and the targets individually have the incentive to clean up not only to be cooperative but because they won't be able to get to the outside world otherwise and their local competitors will.


      Government intervention usually isn't helpful for that kind of thing - to the extent that they have a clue at all, they usually make some relatively uninformed decision, and then the spammers find a way around it. It's bad enough when they're dealing with issues that they do have personal experience with, and worse when they're dealing with something complex that's outside their individual expertise. The long-ago-proposed S.1618 bill was that way - it was primarily useful because any message that references it is likely to be spam, so you can filter with it.

      Meanwhile, what a Chinese government solution would be more likely to do is limit access for politically incorrect groups (Tibetans, Falun Gong and other religions, etc.) and to strengthen the central control of the couple of big telecom companies.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  62. Can we help them comply? by shermozle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So we've used the stick and got their attention now. The aim of the spam guards isn't to hamper communication but to enforce compliance.

    So now how can we help them comply and get *.asia out of the spam blocks?

    What is needed are some good translations of a HOWTO which explains the problem and how to solve it. I don't speak an Asian language but I'm sure there are some who do. Step forward now and help translate such documents!

    1. Re:Can we help them comply? by B.D.Mills · · Score: 2

      This is an excellent idea.

      We should get the assistance of native speakers of Chinese, Japanese and Korean to translate essential information on how to close open relays, secure their systems, etc. Get them to create a web page in their native languages with this information. Then we can refer speakers of those languages to those web pages.

      We should also convince the authors of Red Flag Linux and any other Asian *n?x distributions to ship their products with their mail servers closed by default.

      Another problem is that security holes are less likely to be closed. The sysadmins may be unaware of the latest security holes because of the language barrier. These unpatched Asian systems may be r00ted by hax0rs, and thus serve as an easy spam gateway. The translation project should include Asian-language versions of bugtraq mailing lists.

      --

      The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  63. There may be a good reason for the open relays! by aquarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Chinese system administrators may be leaving their mail relays open on purpose, to escape liability for not filtering "properly." If they actively make decisions about who has access and who doesn't, then they're liable for those decisions, which could be dangerous under an oppressive government. So they refrain from making those decisions at all, and leave everything open to the four winds...

    They also may be trying to allow access to outsiders whose own networks may have been restricted somehow. All we see are the spammers, but there may be some important political or other communication going on here too, which they want to help keep flowing any way they can.

    1. Re:There may be a good reason for the open relays! by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      If they actively make decisions about who has access and who doesn't, then they're liable for those decisions

      So, they're liable because Joe Spammer doesn't have the ability to send mail to everybody in the world with a fake return address? How does that work?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:There may be a good reason for the open relays! by Skapare · · Score: 2

      Closing the relaying of a mail server is a security issue, not a filtering issue. One does not filter any content at all. It's simply a case of whether the connection comes from inside or outside. If from outside, then if the mail is not destined for a location this server serves, then do not accept the content at all. The destination is in the SMTP layer, which means it is the "outside" of the envelope. It's like the postman holding the envelope up to you and asking you if this person lives in your home. You can say no and not be handed the letter, so you will not even have opened it to see if it was junk.

      There are some closed mail servers there. I've tested many and found a lot are closed. So there is no widespread pervasive reason to leave them open. If anything, the Chinese government should see the openness as potentially evading the Great Firewall. Allowing outsiders to send mail through because their own mail servers were blocked may be an intent. But it is a careless one if they don't at least narrow the access down to specific network space.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  64. I like getting spam from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everytime I get spam from China, I look up the names and emails on whois and send them a thank you note for subscribing to the Keep Taiwan Free and Democratic, and Free Tibet newsleter, and by the way, Happy to have you join us in boycotting the Olympics in China.... have a nice day.

    I keep a copy in the templates folder in my mailer.

  65. Deterioration by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 2

    What a sad day, when people on /. suggest Hotmailä of all freemailers.

    Seems this plaace is getting opverrun by linux-wannabes

    --
    Moritz
  66. I mean.. call me by saqmaster · · Score: 1

    ..ignorant.. but being european, the only parts o the net that I see is the US, Europe, well actually anywhere apart from Asia.

    Not quite sure why that is. Sure, I can't go to a *.jp site and understand what it say's - nor can I read the spam mail I get from that side of the world.. But even though Japan etc. is apparently the most technical place in the world.. there is very little exposure (in my eyes) of them on the web..

    Well.. no, that's not entirely true. Every now and again I get a random message pop up in ICQ saying "Hi, I am from China, will you be my friend?". I hate those. I'd rather this wasn't the only interraction us westies have with the far east.

    --
    "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story..."
  67. Effective by Martin+S. · · Score: 2


    The key point is how effective this tactic has been, how often have we manage to 'persuade' a legislative to our view, within a week by conventional means (lobbies/petitions).

  68. Tough, but not impossible by BMaximus · · Score: 0
    "It is absolutely impossible to isolate China on the Internet today when the exchange of information is so frequent," Xinhua quoted Yang Lu


    Funny, we seem to be doing a good job of it if China is screaming about it. Looks like we're not going to let up either until the Admins over there DO SOMETHING to SECURE their servers!

    BMaximus
  69. Can you read? by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They want to use email, but can't accept that people don't want crap to be mass-mailed to them. This is a sure sign that China's only interest in the Internet is monetary, and that it is our duty to block off abusive .cn mail servers to show them that this bullshit doesn't play on the open Internet.

    The artical is talking about China banning spamming outright which is a lot more then any leader in the US is even willing to think about. They do accept that people don't want spam and are looking to an internal solution to the problem.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Can you read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, they're probably going to shoot some spammers and declare the problem solved.

    2. Re:Can you read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banning spam won't do anything. A lot of the spam does not originate in China. It comes from abusive spammers in other countries using mail-servers in China. They can do this because the mail-server's sys-admins are not taking care of busisnes.

    3. Re:Can you read? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Until and unless they impose the death penalty for spamming, I won't be satisfied.

      (why not? They impose it for a lot of other things!)

    4. Re:Can you read? by Jonny+290 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This is the biggest problem that I have with this law.

      Free world wants spam gone.

      Free world asks China to make spamming illegal.

      China makes spamming illegal to retain favored status with the Free World.

      Some poor 20 year old with a family gets 10 years in prison or shot in the back of the fucking head trying to make a few extra dollars, all because we were too lazy and self-centered to hit the delete key or set up procmail properly.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    5. Re:Can you read? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I don't have a problem with your scenario.

      As for "lazy", it takes more time for me to compose a spam complaint than it does to "just hit delete". I used to "just hit delete" until I "just hit delete" on the e-mail of a high-school acquantence and lost his e-mail address forever. Now I ask the ISP hosting the spammer to "just hit delete" -- and I have no problems with a government dealing with their spammers by "just hitting delete" on the electric chair or gallows.

    6. Re:Can you read? by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      Well, then, that's *your* fault for not having a:some sort of trash bin or non-permanent delete in your mail client or, b:the lack of some sort of filter.

      If you get email that's so important that you get one email deleted and wail and gnash your teeth about it, keep your messages on your server if you use POP3 or set up a filter to copy all incoming mail to a separate, properly chmoded file.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    7. Re:Can you read? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      At the time it was PINE because the most common form of internet access at the time was through a UNIX shell on dialup.

      Anyway, while precautions against losing important information is a good idea, I should *not* be forced to modify my habits because spammers have decided that my inbox is a dumping ground for their crap. They deserve death and I will feel no pity for a spammer whose actions gets them killed.

    8. Re:Can you read? by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

      Should you be 'forced' to modify your habits by being careful and not driving around town at 2am on New Year's Eve because there are tons of drunkards driving around? No, but you should for your own well-being, and your hardheadedness may, (notice I said *may*, not *will*) put you at a higher risk for being killed.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  70. Why, we'll be happy to stop blocking your email... by kcbrown · · Score: 2
    ...when you take down your Great Firewall.

    Until then, quit wasting our time.

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  71. Ah - finally, an unlikely confluence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of Chinese law (seems it's death for a quite a few infractions) and dispicable, dispicable Spammer behavior.

    Now... if the Chinese could just catch'em.

  72. Re:Wonder how bad spamming in China is? PLEASE HEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually There is Law to stop this, You can either

    1) call the police (just pick up the phone and dial 999 pretty easy isn't it)
    2) Hire a Lawyer (also pretty easy just pick up the phone and call your lawyer, it's easier to get legal advice from lawyers than geeks on Slashdot)

    Asking ppl on slashdot is not going to help you.

  73. Re:Chinese racial slurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not white Devil, just Ghost Man, it basically applies too all non Asian people. It's not really an insult or racist thing.

    HHhmm... Seriously there's really not much racist slang in Chinese .... "Ghost man" is right about the most racist thing you can get there :P

  74. Filtering.. by Patrick+Cable+II · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think we should keep them on block until they get rid of their internet restrictions.

    Patrick

    1. Re:Filtering.. by Skapare · · Score: 2

      I won't. If they stop the open relaying, I'll remove the blocking of their mail servers. I'm not blocking their mail servers because of Chinese government blocking web sites; I'm blocking their mail servers because I don't want to have spam delivered to my servers, and I happen to know spam comes from their servers. To me it's strictly an orthogonal issue. I'll leave my hidden SSL proxy open for my Chinese friends, though.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  75. Re:Censorship Firewalls & Spammer Blocking - S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Open email relays are easily used to forward spam, but are also useful in evading censors.

    You might want to think about that carefully for a second. Pretend you're a Chinese citizen interested in evading censors. First of all, you would probably note that there are better methods of evading censors than open relays (which leave at least a somewhat traceable path). But if you accept that, then you would probably be most interested in using an open relay in a country other than China. Getting China to secure their open relays is not going to have a large impact on the portion of their population that's trying to avoid censorship.

  76. Re:Common sense = mail routing loops by morzel · · Score: 2
    The problem with that approach is that two mailservers with "backtracking" enabled would beat each other to dead checking one another before a single mail actually gets delivered...

    Server 1: open connection to server 2, wants to send mail.
    Server 2: gets request from server 1, opens connection to server 1 to check for open relay
    Server 1: gets request from server 2, opens connection to server 2 to check for open relay
    Server 2: goto step 2, repeat ad infinitum.

    --
    Okay... I'll do the stupid things first, then you shy people follow.
    [Zappa]
  77. How to make the "joke" come true... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
    ...that as much as you might joke that spammers should be lined up and shot, that gets a lot less funny when you're dealing with the Chinese government.

    Actually, it is quite easy to make it happen: if you get a spam from a Chinese open relay, first warn the admin. Give them a week. If the spam still continues, start sending mass-mailed anticommunist propaganda to random Chinese addresses through the same open relay. This will get that open relay shut down real quick.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
    1. Re:How to make the "joke" come true... by Kirruth · · Score: 1
      If the spam still continues, start sending mass-mailed anticommunist propaganda to random Chinese addresses

      Now there's something to pass on to some of my "Free Tibet" chums: definitely two birds with one stone...

      --
      "Well, put a stake in my heart and drag me into sunlight."
    2. Re:How to make the "joke" come true... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      sending a warning to the admin does NOTHING. This is why we blackhole all of china. China will have to get things cleaned up if they want this policy reversed. Other countries are in the same boat (china is just making the most noise...)

    3. Re:How to make the "joke" come true... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
      sending a warning to the admin does NOTHING.

      I know. But it's the ethical thing to do before having them hauled off to the firing range ;-)

      --
      Say no to software patents.
  78. Re:Yeah right by rm-r · · Score: 1

    Just as the Greeks called it the Mediterrian Sea. The sea in the middle of the world. It's perfectly reasonable behaviour, and certainly a lot less arrogant than the country whose 'World Series' is only open to teams from that country...

    --

    J-aims
    --
    Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  79. Ethikul biznizmen use Smart quotes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I live in Hong Kong and because of them I can¦t get e-mail through to some of my family and friends. Now I¦m a decent person, I post to /. send in bug reports for open-source software and I¦ve never spammed anyone in my life but I still have to suffer these restrictions.

    Furrfu! Microsoft's empire has no limits, especially not in the empire of the middle.

  80. Never seen Asian Spam by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    I get my (un)fair share of Spam in my variuous email accounts, but I've never seen any advertising for marital aids, loans, free holidays, internet casinos or any other such crap in Asia. It's all for US-based companies, with a small smattering of Europe and S. American. So whereas the Spam might be sent via Asian email servers, it seems pretty obvious that it originates from US sources!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Never seen Asian Spam by talks_to_birds · · Score: 2
      The issue is open relays.

      If you were to look at the full headers, sure, maybe the spam originates from a dialup in the US, but without an open relay in Asia it goes nowhere.

      The vast majority of spam is bounced off open relays in Asia, predominately Korea, and China...

      t_t_b

      --
      I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  81. Rights? What about OUR rights? by Sturm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen several threads on this story talking about the rights of the Chinese people, the rights of the Chinese government and people's right in general to communicate. But what about the rights of the ISPs that are getting spammed to death by open Chinese relays? Bandwidth costs money. Disk storage costs money. Admins taking time to play "whack an open relay" costs money. Responding to abuse complaints costs money. In our rush to protect the rights of indiviuals, lets not forget this issue isn't just about the rights of the Chinese people. It's also about the cost doing business and protecting the rights of people on this side of the pond.

  82. SpamCop statistics on China by Silas · · Score: 2
    China should look at SpamCop's weekly statistics on most exploited open relays, and then consider carefully whether or not this is "our" problem, or "their" problem.

    If you produce counterfeit bills and try to spend them at my store, and I ask you to leave saying "your fake money's no good here", would you really want to try to sue me into accepting your funny money?

  83. China, Spam, Bandwidth by brian+duross · · Score: 1

    China would probably use half the bandwidth they do now if they would just close the open relays. I wonder how much bandwidth is actually used over there just because there are lots of open relays.

  84. Solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone deserves a chance... and here is a very simple solution. In a past Slashdot.org article it was mentioned that Chinese IPs are getting blocked when the server administrator can't be contacted.

    If this is a serious enough issue for the Chinese givernment then perhaps the Chinese server admins should personally contact the admins for servers (where they are blocked) and ask for the block to be lifted. (Telephone and fax are still legitimate means of communication). This means the people who don't want to be blocked... won't be blocked. If the Chinese server is again responsible for the relay or sending of spam then thex get permanently block.

    Perhaps another get rich quick internet scheme could be acting as a middle man between china and western organisations.

  85. translated version by pick_d3_sucks · · Score: 1

    Forces out Chinese IP extremely reason China with is not the junk mail victim

    2002-03-05 10:15:08

    .. Attends nine session of National People's Congress five conferences representatives thinks, some western nations companies and the organization recently adopted the measure screen shut from China's electronic mail, was the reason behavior, because, China also was not the western junk mail victim.

    The Deputy to the National People's Congress, the Academia Sinica Chengdu computer application research institute mathematics and computer science research center director the poplar rumor, he has on-line seen the related news, but, " the majority of junk mails all are not China make, why has to force out Chinese mail?"

    Recently, American, the European some companies and the organization declared, China has become the global junk mail the main transmission place, except completely blocked the Chinese telecommunication the address, other means have not stopped " to come the tendency which was in flood from China's junk mail ". It is reported, has had the up to ten thousand family company, the organization and the personal website comprehensively blocks China's IP address.

    Jilin Province Standing Committee of the National People's Congress assistant director, Jilin University Professor Zeng Xiao Zhen said, China also was the junk mail victim, his personally then frequently received the massive junk mails, had " ÂÖ¦ " the propaganda material, fabricated a rumor slanders letter, advertisement, sales promotion and so on. This kind does not agree after the mailbox owner but randomly to send the mail the behavior is very hateful.

    He think, China is the junk mail origin place view is not true, he receive the junk mail are most is overseas sends in. At present, takes the developing nation China from the technology prevents the junk mail very is also difficult.

    The poplar road thinks, the junk mail is the worry which high tech brings. The people while enjoy the electronic mail convenience, also can not but puzzle by the junk mail, this was similar to answers the telephone which did not want to meet.

    He point out, must comprehensively force out Chinese mail is impossible. He said: " Is so close in the information exchange, academic, commercial intercourse so frequent today, must isolate China on Internet absolutely does not manage."

    Zeng Xiao Zhen said, did this kind of blockade actually is imprudent, two days ago he also gave USA Texas the son through the electronic mail, has not had the problem. China has many IP address, the impossible 11 screens to shut. He use are Jilin Province's one place mailbox.

    Academia Sinica Changchun applied chemistry spectrum laboratory researcher Pei presents Kui states, he use are research institute's electronic mailbox. As a result of research institute local area network Àï¼Ó together firewall, therefore the junk mail are less, also has not been sealed up.

    Zeng Xiao Zhen said, the junk mail was one international question, should solve through the international laws and regulations, but the at present also lacks such international laws and regulations. China also should formulate the corresponding laws and regulations, performs to the junk mail manufacturer to punish.

    Just " wealth " is evaluated by USA Chinese business circle man of the hour's Beijing the king article Beijing representative also indicates with friend software company President, the network behavior drives on the picture on the road, the proper law comes the standard, must solve problem through international between cooperation.

    (Edition: One anger draws a sword)

    1. Re:translated version by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Aaarrrghh, learn how to write Haikus properly why don't you!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  86. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wang Wei (pronounced Wrong Way) is the guy who crashed his own plane by flying around too close to the American plane. You know that. And bombing the Chinese embassy was a mistake--perhaps your country should have evacuated it during the highly appropriate bombing of Belgrade. I guess China just wanted to be known as a supporter of genocidal maniac Milosevich. Oh well...

  87. US leaders have already banned much spam by yerricde · · Score: 2

    The artical is talking about China banning spamming outright which is a lot more then any leader in the US is even willing to think about.

    US leaders have more than thought about it. With the junk fax law (part of the 1996 Telecom Act), the United States has already banned spam sent over a phone line.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  88. Minor point by evilrooster · · Score: 1

    Because it's being relayed through your servers, Zeng

    Mr. Xiaozhen...

    Zeng Xiaozhen, being a Chinese name, is cited surname first. Thus he is Mr. Zeng, or Xiaozhen to his friends.

    Don't you just *hate* it when people can't get basic concepts like how to address people?

    --
    evilrooster - the email of the species is deadlier than the mail -
    1. Re:Minor point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think I give a shit? How about I just avoid the issue and call them all Chink?

  89. uhhh by poemofatic · · Score: 2

    Seriously there's really not much racist slang in Chinese .... "Ghost man" is right about the most racist thing you can get there

    Tell that to the minorities. As late as the 1950's Chairman Mao had to order the beaurocrats in southwest china _not_ to refer to the non-han minorities (miao, gui, naaxi, etc.) as "dogs" in official edicts i.e. laws.

    This is not to say that the US didn't have /doesn't have it's own racial problems, but to pretend that mandarin is somehow exceptionally lacking in racist jargon is ..well..pretty racist.

    btw -- not sure what this has to do with closing down open relays in china. that seems like a pretty politically neutral common sense thing.

    --

    When in doubt, have a man come through a door with a gun in his hand.

    1. Re:uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      miao- No idea what the hell is this
      gui- this one means ghost, probably the only one that I've heard of.
      naaxi- I guess this one's for German LoL again I never heard of it.

    2. Re:uhhh by poemofatic · · Score: 2

      China has 55 recognized minorities, and many more minor unrecognized ones. the Naaxi live around Lijiang, and are a matriarchal ethnic group. There are hundreds of miao, often called hmong, groups in southwest china, laos, and thailand. the US used miao soldiers in its proxy war in laos, I think. Many such refugees live in Minessota now. There are silver, yellow, flower, black and many other kinds of miao people in china. At one time, there was a Miao kingdom in sw china, and they used to kick ass in their heyday. The gui or ge people, also in Yunnan province, are an unrecognized minority, but nevertheless have their own language and customs. I don't think the word means anything in mandarin, since it's in their own language. I got to visit a few of their villages a while ago. There are many such interesting groups, including a tribe of hook nosed, white haired jews who were brought over by Khubilai Khan to be some of his guards. I think they've managed to avoid intermarriage, for the most part. And of course there are muslim uighers(sic) in the northwest, and the tibetans in uh Tibet. Warning that spellings are transliterations and are likely to differ from place to place. Also, my memory is not so good.

      It's hard to find good references on the web, put a list of the official minorities + some more info is here

      --

      When in doubt, have a man come through a door with a gun in his hand.

  90. No and then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to.

  91. Blocking .cn seems unfair and ineffective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, I'm not sure if people in China can choose their own ISP, but if they can, then blocking all .cn domains -- while understandable -- isn't fair nor does it contribute to fixing the problem.
    Such a block would indiscriminately block all ISPs regardless of whether they had an open relay or not. Therefore, there would be no additional market pressure for rouge ISPs to change.
    On the other hand, if only bad ISPs were blocked, then I'd figure that Chinese Internet users who wanted to communicate with the rest of "the Internet" would avoid poorly administered ISP in favour of a reputable ones.

    1. Re:Blocking .cn seems unfair and ineffective by Skapare · · Score: 2

      unfair? yes

      ineffective? no

      The problem in China is that a very high proportion of the servers online are open relays. I dare say this could well be in excess of 90%. To simply block them one by one when spam arrives is ineffective. More spam comes from the next one as spammers (substantially in the US) just move on to the next relay. This proportion is staying high because system administrators do not close the relays. Certainly this can be due to the language barrier. I cannot write in Chinese, and they likely cannot read English. Moreover, because of their inability to read English, they may not understand the nature of the spam going through their server (from the US, back to the US, peddling junk). If they even notice at all, they notice an overload that at some point dies down. The server likely gets DoS'd for a while and the spammer stops using it and moves on, probably not coming back to that one for a long time. To the sysadmin, it was just a day or two the server wasn't working right. Now their mailbox is full of complaints containing spam, none of which they are able to read. So the problem does not get fixed. The percentage of servers that are open relays remains high. Spam still comes through. Sysadmins in other countries get tired of constrantly tracking a moving target and pull out the big guns, download the APNIC or TWNIC assignment tables, load the database, and watch the spam load drop in half in one day.

      I have not been able to identify a single good ISP in China. Every one I know about, I know of because they leak spam. Certainly there are some I don't know about, and there could be a good one in there. And it's certainly not fair to them, as I'm sure they'd love to expand their customer base, but their good deeds still don't get them anywhere.

      The problem is pandemic to China, Korea, and Taiwan. It's easy to conclude its a cultural thing. And you know what ... I haven't ruled out that this plays some part. A lot of that spam actually originates right there in China (or Korea or Taiwan). I simply have no idea how widespread it might be perceived as just a normal way to do business.

      I do make an effort to be sure I don't block other countries. I get the assignments and then aggregate the assignments by country code. The assignments for CN, HK, KR, and TW then get extracted and used to build the hash table my Postfix daemons use to block the mail, in addition to other data, including some other IP ranges, many dialup domains, ORDB, ORBZ, and any server which fails to have a reverse (PTR record) DNS name which resolves forward (A record) back to the connecting IP address. I'm getting an average of 1 spam in my inbox each day, and hundreds per day banging on the locked door (counting all of them, not just Chinese or Asian). If I were to today open up China, I'd probably get 40 times as much spam as I get now (since I have most all of it effectively blocked now).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  92. Re:Yeah right by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

    That "Center Country" meaning dates from many centuries ago.
    One of the reasons they did that was because China was indeed in the middle of what they call "the world". They didn't have airplanes or ships that can cross the entire world. They didn't knew about what was beyond the sea or the mountains.
    You expect them to suddenly change their country's name and confuse everybody?
    Today, China do business with companies all over the world.

    "I was in China a few years ago, and asked some people if they knew what happened at Tineman Squre (sp?) on the awful day of June 4th."

    Perhaps it's because you didn't tell them which year?
    Honestly... I'm an European citizen and I've also never heard of anything about June the 4th.

  93. Re:Yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes I am in the middle, right in the centre among all countries. MY country in the center.

    They call us a third world.

    Now who is arrogant?

  94. funny enough just got a chinese virus warning by denny_d · · Score: 1

    oddly enough, just yesterday, got spammed with a gif.virus from an email server in HK

    my first, hopefully last

  95. Doubt it by westfieldscientific · · Score: 1

    Messages like those simply annoy their recipients, and get deleted, filtered or whatever, but there are enough idiots out there convinced that email is a surefire wat to become a billionaire overnight to keep the game going.

    It doesn't work, and neither to popup ads, popunder ads and most banners. People online simply tend to interpret any form of advertising as interference with the flow of interactive communication.

    It's taking forever for the knuckleheads to grasp, but with the loss of $1Trillion USD in dud dotcoms they're beginning to catch on. The world will never be in short supply of idiots but eventually a mindset will emerge where: "everybody knows" spam is a waste of money to produce the same way "everybody knows" you have to run windoze.

    --
    give me a /home where the buffalo roam
  96. here's an idea, china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    clean up your human rights policy, then worry about your email problems.

  97. solution for china is simple: by poemofatic · · Score: 2



    find an open relay in the states and route all mail through it. hmm.. maybe a couple of open relays.

    --

    When in doubt, have a man come through a door with a gun in his hand.

    1. Re:solution for china is simple: by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

      Haha that is one freakin' clever solution!

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
  98. My thoughts by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I admin multiple servers and would love to block all of China. Personally I've been doing on my own mail spools for years and I've never filtered one piece of mail that wasn't spam. If they ever want out of my blacklists, they are damned sure going to have to earn it.

    1. Re:My thoughts by Skapare · · Score: 2

      So why don't you go ahead and block all of China? Or are you just not getting any spam from there?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  99. Only if.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We'll remove spam blocks when China secures mail servers, cuts down on spammers, and opens up the internet. No more censorship.

  100. Re:Yeah right by Carmody · · Score: 2
    No more arrogant than the US and certainly less judgmental.


    I have a major problem with my country, the United States, because I think we are too arrogant and too judgmental.


    That having been said, the above poster's statement is completely ridiculous. The United States more judgmental than CHINA? Where on EARTH are you getting your information? Yes, we are going through an extremely jingoistic phase right now, but we ain't got NOTHING on the Chinese government. Hell, the fact that I have the freedom to post this, including the first paragraph, automatically shows that the United States is less judgmental than China.


    A sense of perspective, please. The United States has its problems, severe problems, but we are not Communist China nor are we Nazi Germany. Just because some of us unfairly put this country on a pedestal is no reason to unfairly dump us in a gutter.

    No more arrogant than the US and certainly less judgmental. My god, what a silly statement.

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
  101. Spam control in repressive countries by kindbud · · Score: 2

    Will the Chinese government crack down on open relays? Will it become a criminal offense? What if the Chinese government comes to view the problem as one of national security?

    The spam blocks, especially the DNS blacklists, are supposed to get the attention of the operator, so he will notice the problem and get it fixed. But it seems that it is the Chinese government that has taken notice. Is imprisonment a suitable punishment for neglecting to close an open relay? How about execution? If the Chinese government moves in this direction, how much culpability for the human rights abuses that would result do the operators of the DNS lists need to bear?

    I am not attempting to hand out blame, I am just asking some interesting questions.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Spam control in repressive countries by dajalas · · Score: 1

      The DNS blacklisters are behaving reasonably. Is it really their fault if the Chinese government is oppressive? If so, why?

  102. Re:Yeah right by jet_silver · · Score: 1

    Less judgmental, huh?

    Delegates to China's parliament are reproaching Western Internet administrators...

    Look up 'reproach'.

    I have been blocking .cn for years, and I won't stop until the spam does. It is .cn's problem. Let them fix it.

  103. Yeh wel... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I wish the junk fax law would be applied to email, but for now we're getting things like making it illegal to forge headers and allowing an opt out list and that's it. And those are only state by state things.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Yeh wel... by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      Well, if you can show that the the sender used a modem to upload their spam, or you used a modem to download and read it, you might have a case.

      Ask a lawyer (I'm not one), but a cursory glance at the text of the law sure makes it sound like you'd have a valid argument.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  104. less judgemental? by NFW · · Score: 1

    China is less judgemental? I assume you're not talking about the way they treat foreign web sites, domestic religious groups (e.g. falun gong) or internet users (especially dissidents) or anything like that, so I have to wondering just what you are talking about.

    --
    Build stuff. Stuff that walks, stuff that rolls, whatever.
  105. Re:Common sense = mail routing loops by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

    This isn't a fatal flaw with the idea at all. In fact, if this happened, it would mean the guy who wrote the mail server was a nitwit because he didn't take the most obvious precautions to prevent loops. There are several trivial ways to do it:

    Keep a list of servers that you're currently in the process of validating. If a relay check request arrives from one of them, send a response without bothering to send out a redundant second relay check request (this is just common sense). This would always stop the loop on its second hop.

    OR

    - Get request from server X
    - Check to see if X appears in local cached list of blacklisted servers.
    - If not on list, generate random number t between 0 and 1.
    - If t is below some fixed threshold, open connection to X to check for open relay. If t is above the threshold, just forward the email even though it might be spam.
    - If X is found to be an open relay, add X to blacklist. Otherwise forward the email.

    Loops would still occur but they would go extinct fairly quickly. Some spam would get through at the beginning but a torrent coming from a single relay would get that relay added to the blacklist cache almost immediately.

  106. You COMPLETELY missed the point.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And since you can't see it, here it is:

    A government that implements stringent blocking of the internet, then complains when it is blocked itself. It's called *hypocrisy*.

    Man, that academics / government thing came out of left field! How does it dispute the original post? When I say, "China says..." I mean the representative voice of China, the government. And if you say, "the USA is too ignorant...", then you are by default talking about the government. So your first and second sentences together don't make sense.

    What I can't believe is that someone misunderstanding the original post got modded *UP*.

  107. Re:Why, we'll be happy to stop blocking your email by CaptCosmic · · Score: 1
    ...when you take down your Great Firewall.

    So, would that be called the Great Firewall of China?

    --
    -> Capt Cosmic <-
  108. Spammer by bayers · · Score: 1

    I'm willing to pay good money for a picture of a Chinese executioner shooting a spammer in the back of the head.

    1. Re:Spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm willing to pay good money for a picture of a Chinese executioner shooting a spammer in the back of the head.

      Only if we get to send that picture to your children first.

  109. Arrogance covers up an inability to relate... by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    I agree, the Chinese government is extremely arrogant, but in some ways the U.S. government is worse. The U.S. government interferes with the governments of other countries, and kills people with whom it disagrees. Here is a collection of links from respected news sources that supports that assertion: What should be the Response to Violence?

    All arrogance covers up an inability to relate. We need more socially skilled leaders.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:Arrogance covers up an inability to relate... by Carmody · · Score: 2
      I agree, the Chinese government is extremely arrogant, but in some ways the U.S. government is worse. The U.S. government interferes with the governments of other countries, and kills people with whom it disagrees.


      And the Chinese government does not kill the people with whom it disagrees? And the Chinese government does not interfere with the governments of other countries? Hmmm... why not visit Taiwan sometime and ask them what they think of that assertion.


      Again, I agree that the U.S. government is doing things it should not be doing. I'm really frustrated with my government to the point of depression. But saying that the United States is AS arrogant as China, and MORE judgmental... that's reckless hyperbole at best and silly if you actually believe it.

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Arrogance covers up an inability to relate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you don't know already, Taiwan IS part of China, it's historically part of china, and it WILL always be part of China. Learn some Chinese history before commenting on anything as complicated as Taiwan and China relationship.

    3. Re:Arrogance covers up an inability to relate... by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      Yes, your complex, well-reasoned answer certainly clears up the China/Taiwan question. Just as Kuwait was historically part of Iraq, so it is now. Oh, wait....

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    4. Re:Arrogance covers up an inability to relate... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      seems like the taiwanese ppl got a different point of view...

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  110. Don't forget political activism by dsfox · · Score: 1

    I don't know why I even bother...

    1. Re:Don't forget political activism by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Then don't.

  111. And if they weren't guilty... by dsfox · · Score: 1

    they wouldn't have been arrested!

    1. Re:And if they weren't guilty... by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're saying criminals get rewarded and normal people get executed? Oh wait, China didn't collapse because of a too high criminal rate. So much for your theory.

  112. Debtors prison by dsfox · · Score: 1

    Yes, judges are loathe to jail people for non-payment of fines. This is a fairly central feature of our legal system, because it turns out that people in prison have a hard time making money!

  113. How do we know this if their email is blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kinda like...
    If your phone service goes out, call us at 1-800-pac-bell.

    funny stuff.

    (hey bert, you got a bananna in your ear)

    (I can't hear you, I have a bananna in my ear)

  114. Two wrongs don't make a right.. by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If the spam still continues, start sending mass-mailed anticommunist propaganda to random Chinese addresses through the same open relay. This will get that open relay shut down real quick.

    Sorry, tempting as that tactic may be, it's an abuse of the random addresses in question.

    Depending on how much monitoring the thugs do, it may suffice just to send yourself anti-communist screeds periodically through the open relay.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Two wrongs don't make a right.. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      &GT If the spam still continues, start sending mass-mailed anticommunist propaganda to random Chinese addresses through the same open relay. This will get that open relay shut down real quick.

      Sorry, tempting as that tactic may be, it's an abuse of the random addresses in question.


      Good point. Don't use random addresses. Build up a list of N open relays. For each one have it mail webmaster (or whatever) at the other N-1.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  115. The only sensible solution. by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

    This is the only way to encourage it. To them it's a really difficult issue, because the people initiating the spam are most likely not chinese, and they don't want to admit that they're incompetent when it comes to anything because they're proud as all hell. So we get OUR networks flooded? Why should we have to deal with that? They're not the drunk drivers of the information superhighway, but they sure as hell are the enablers. What I'm worried about is that some asshole over here is going to get some chinese people executed for illegal spamming activity on chinese servers. Some poor schmuck over there who can't read the english manual will get shot in the head because of some sleazy american "entrepreneur" using their relay. I'm usually one for very simple solutions, but this problem is pretty complicated. I think that all we really CAN do is block them, and let them realize that they have to figure out how to run their machines before they can come out and play again. ~D

    1. Re:The only sensible solution. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > To them it's a really difficult issue, because the people initiating the spam are most likely not chinese, and they don't want to admit that they're incompetent when it comes to anything because they're proud as all hell.

      No one wants anyone to admit anything.

      No one wants anyone to be publicly shamed.

      What everyone outside those offending ISPs wants is for those open relays to become closed, like magic, no questions asked or answered. That's all that's necessary, and we're all happy global emailers again.

  116. Talk to your ISP by SomeoneYouDontKnow · · Score: 2

    I sympathize with your situation, but I have to disagree. These blocks were put in place because the offending ISPs refused to do anything about spam. I've been out of the anti-spam discussions on Usenet for a few years now, but when I was there, Hong Kong ISPs were some of the world's worst. Sending a complaint to them would either get you no response, or, worse, the ISP would just pass it along to the spammer, who would then likely send you a few thousand messages for your trouble. Faced with that kind of attitude, responsible sysadmins did the only thing they could: block these ISPs outright.

    Now we get to the part about removing these blocks. Do you know if your ISP still has a spam problem? If it does, call them and express your dissatisfaction with their service. You pay your hard-earned money to these people, and you deserve a clean, professionally-run operation. Do they have an abuse desk that responds to spam complaints in a professional and timely manner? They should. Do they have their mail servers secured? They should. Do they know who the local troublemakers (spammers, script kiddies, etc.) are and refuse to keep letting them sign up for accounts? They should. In short, when they get their house in order, the blocks will come down. It may take a while, but it'll happen. They may want to get someone to post to a newsgroup like news.admin.net-abuse.email and let folks there know that they're working to get their spam problem under control. That will get them unblocked sooner.

    If you really want to get the attention of your local ISPs, look into forming a Hong Kong chapter of CAUCE. This has been done in the U.S., Canada, Europe, Australia, and India. Go to www.cauce.org and ask them how to get it up and running. If there was ever a time to do this, it'd be now.

    --
    That light you see at the end of the tunnel might be from an oncoming train.
  117. They are both terrible. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    The U.S. government kills people all over the world. The Chinese government kills its own people. They are both terrible.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  118. Re:Wrong, but thanks for playing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people might say see the bigger picture,to them I say is there really a picture bigger than the us of a and whatever happens to be around the edge of that great country.

    The answer is yes.

  119. Better find a trusted translator by HerbieStone · · Score: 1
    Better find someone you trust to do the translation. Else you won't know what the translation *really* says.


    At least, that's what Monty Python's "Hungarian Phrasebook"-sketch teaches us. ;)

    1. Re:Better find a trusted translator by MeepMeep · · Score: 1

      Actually, you just get another translator to do something called a 'back-translation'. It's a standard procedure when doing any sort of translation.

  120. Re:Overzealous Spamguarding NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That aside, I've always wondered why people get so upset over spam.
    1. It causes them to lose mail that they want
    2. It costs them money
    3. It costs them time
    4. It's an invasion of their privacy
    It's not that hard to hit the delete button.
    That's what the blocking lists are doing, JHD.
    My web hosting service (yahoo) for unknown reasons is listed on 1 spam list.
    Google is your friend.
    I've tried - there seems to be no way off the list.
    Use a provider that doesn't support spam.
    I want to be able to control IF my email gets spam filtered.
    So do I. That's why I dropped an otherwise good provider in order to switch to one that blocked known spam sources.
    I don't want someone else to make that choice for me.
    The owners of the servers don't want you to make the decision for them, and neither do I.
    We, as users, are losing our freedom too.
    I agree, but not the way that you meant it. We, as users, are losing our right to openly post articles on, eg., Usenet without fear of harrassment. The blocking lists are an attempt to restore that freedom.
    I'm shocked that noone seems to notice or care.
    Objection, Your Honor! Assumes claims not in evidence. People do notice, and do care, passionately; they just don't agree with your subjective analysis of what is happening and what should be done about it.
  121. Re:Why, we'll be happy to stop blocking your email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another lame troll posting away wasting out time...

  122. Crawling frim Chinese ISPs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed. After reading that previous story on Cisco's firewall, thing, I tried

    http://chinese.search.yahoo.com/search/big5?p=chin ese+democracy&u=b

    .. and indeed saw only one, benign match. Curiously, within two hours, the www host associated with my browser's domain was crawled by 211.101.236.160. This was the first time in two years that my site had been looked at by a Chinese host. Seriously!

    inetnum: 211.101.236.0 - 211.101.236.255
    netname: NUCUL
    descr: NUcul,the customer of Capital
    Network descr: NiUang culture
    descr: ICP
    descr: BeiJing
    country: CN
    admin-c: DZ36-AP
    admin-c: DZ36-AP
    tech-c: DZ36-AP
    mnt-by: MAINT-CNNIC-AP
    changed: ipmaster@capitalnet.com.cn 20010830
    source: APNIC person: DanDan Zhao
    address: 1-3th Floor,Shen Chang Building Haidian District,Beijing country: CN
    phone: +86-10-86243666-2152
    fax-no: +86-10-62636116
    e-mail: ipmaster@capitalnet.com.cn
    nic-hdl: DZ36-AP
    mnt-by: MAINT-CNNIC-AP
    changed: ipmaster@capitalnet.com.cn 20010821
    source: APNIC
    1. Re:Crawling frim Chinese ISPs by JohnBE · · Score: 1

      I've noted something similar in the past (but far worse).

      --
      e4 e5
  123. A Tale of Chinese Hypocrisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we have classic Chinese hypocrisy. The Chinese (where "Chinese" means Chinese people, not merely the Chinese government) want us Americans to lift the blocks hindering the flow of e-mail. Yet, these very Chinese fully support censorship. Specifically, these Chinese support the blocks hindering access to the web sites of Amnesty International , CNN , "Washington Post", etc.

    The pro-censorship, anti-human-rights bent of most Chinese is fairly easy to spot if you follow the news regularly. For example, most Chinese in Hong Kong support the return of Hong Kong to mainland China. A CNN/Time survey showed, in fact, that 60% of the Chinese in Hong Kong support the return of Hong Kong to mainland China. (reference: "Poll: Hong Kong residents optimistic") While East Timorese fought and died for independence from the oppressive Indonesian government, the Chinese in Hong Kong cheered the mainland Chinese government.

    Here's another fact. Many of you are college students. At your university, attend your local meeting of Amnesty International. The engineering and business schools will have plenty of Chinese people, but there will be virtually _NO_ Chinese faces in a meeting of Amnesty International. Chinese (and other Orientals) are over-represented in engineering and business schools, but they are under-represented in meetings of Amnesty International. Do you doubt what I say? I challenge you to disprove me. Attend that meeting of Amnesty International. I dare you.

    The bottom line is this. Ignore the complaints from the Chinese on the matter of our attempts to block e-mail spam from China (which, by the way, is the software piracy capital of the world).

  124. Half hour later... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm hungry for more Chinese Spam!

  125. Hypocrisy is Part of Chinese People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hypocrisy is considered a virtue in Chinese society. By "society", I refer to the Chinese people themselves, not merely the government. Allow me to list several facts that have escaped the radar of good-hearted but naive Americans.

    1. Most Chinese in Hong Kong support the return of Hong Kong to mainland China. A CNN/Time survey showed, in fact, that 60% of the Chinese in Hong Kong support the return of Hong Kong to mainland China. (reference: ""Poll: Hong Kong residents optimistic" ) While East Timorese fought and died for independence from the oppressive Indonesian government, the Chinese in Hong Kong cheered the mainland Chinese government.

    2. The constitution of the Chinese living in Taiwan supports the integration of both Tibet and Mongolia into mainland China. While Tibetans suffer and die at the hands of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, the Chinese in Taiwan support integrating Tibet into "One China".

    3. The Chinese son of the chairman of a powerful conglomerate in Taiwan has joined with the son of Jiang Zemin, the butcher of Tibet, to build an advanced silicon-wafer factory in Shanghai. (reference: "Sons of prominent Chinese team up on chip venture")

    4. Senior Chinese military officials retired from the Taiwanese military have gone to mainland China and given military secrets about the American F-16 fighter jet to the Beijing government. (reference: "Military secrets on sale to China")

    5. Most Chinese, including those living in the United States of America, support the territorial ambitions of mainland China. Most Chinese support integrating Tibet into mainland China. Most Chinese support integrating the Spratleys into mainland China. Most Chinese support integrating the Senkaku islands into mainland China.

    6. Most Chinese support Beijing's attempt to use torture and murder to crush the Falun Gong. Indeed, the Beijing government has funded anti-Falun-Gong meetings within the United States itself. These meetings within the United States are attended by the very same Chinese who fight with tooth and nail to stay permanently in the United States of America.

    7. The Chinese from "poor, little, scared" Taiwan have invested more than $50 billion into more than 50,000 businesses in mainland China. How did this phenomenon happen? Immediately, after the Tienanman Square incident back in June 4, 1989, the American government and businesses curtailed investments in mainland China. The Taiwanese (and the other Chinese in Hong Kong) seized this window of opportunity and accelerated investments into mainland China. The rate of investments from Taiwan into China has skyrocketed to the present levels; investments continue to grow at double-digit rates. (In 1999, the "Wall Street Journal" reported that of all the Chinese arrested and convicted of stealing American military technology to give to Beijing, the majority of these Chinese came from Taiwan.)

    8. These observations are not an exaggeration of any kind. At your university, attend your local meeting of Amnesty International. The engineering and business schools will have plenty of Chinese people, but there will be virtually _NO_ Chinese faces in a meeting of Amnesty International. Chinese (and other Orientals) are over-represented in engineering and business schools, but they are under-represented in meetings of Amnesty International. Why?

    So few Americans really know anything about Chinese society. We Americans are kind-hearted and naive. We simply assume that the Chinese are "just like us" and that the Chinese are simply (financially) poorer versions of ourselves. In reality, the Chinese are not like us. They are poor, but they are _NOT_ like us.

    1. Re:Hypocrisy is Part of Chinese People by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      *golf clap*
      spiffing troll!!!
      *golf clap*

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  126. the quest is for virgin open relays by Skapare · · Score: 2

    The problem with that idea is that most of those are either already closed, or are blocked. Of course there are still some open relays. You'd have to find a fresh virgin one if you want your mail to get through.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  127. Re:Common sense = mail routing loops by macrohard0 · · Score: 0

    It's actually simpler than that.
    Don't accept mail for relay from anybody (outside your domain) --
    no need to check whether the sender is itself an open relay.
    That way, relay-testing mail doesn't trigger a new relay test.

  128. Bandwidth and business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As soon as the bandwidth will be a non negligible part of the chinese economy, be sure that the governement will take their responsabilities.

    Don't forget that this country didn't reach the EU or North American level yet. Sorry for this but until then, blocking open relays sounds a good choice.

    I've been to China, and I will go back again this summer because....its different in EVERYTHING!

  129. It's nice by LennyDotCom · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's nice that they are fighting open relays but I prefer to fight spam another way

    http://www/lenny.com/spam/

    Im all for any method that fights spam

    --
    http://Lenny.com
  130. Rental? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Are you available for rental? That kind of thing would come in handy a lot, and I suck horribly at languages.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  131. Wars. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Wars haven't been won by numbers alone in the last hundred years. See "machine gun" and "Gallipoli" for more information.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  132. Block them all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The overwhelming majority of UCE/UBE/Spam I get originates in the United States. The large majority comes from UUNet, to whom I have complained countless times, including full headers, etc. I would be only too happy if my ISP blocked all mail coming in from the United States since 90% of it is UBE.

    Much of the mail I get with forged headers are clearly United States citizens (the content of their message reflects such). How often have you seen the addendum "This message is not spam..." and some United States law quoted at the end of a message. What's with this misappropriation of U.S. law to transgress on the rights of people that live in countries other than the United States. The hypocracy is huge!

    As many have already mentioned, even the mail that does originate in other countries, usually traces back to the United States. Of the thousands of spam messages I've received over the years very few have had Chinese characters, nor did they originate in China. Blocking open relays in China might take care of spam being rerouted through Chinese servers, but the problem should be attacked at the root. Companies like UUNet need to be sent a clear message. But how do you block goliath?

  133. What "right to choose"? by cduffy · · Score: 2

    You don't have any right to decide whether the service handling your mail offers an unfiltered inbox. It's their choice. If they decide that for whatever reason (say bandwidth, or disk space, or customer preference) they only want to offer filtered mail service, well, that's their right, and you can go be someone else's customer (or run your own server) if you disagree.

    I care very, very much about protecting legitimate rights. On the other hand, people who claim "rights" that don't truly exist (such as "rights" that are truly nothing but obligations on the part of others) annoy me to no end.