Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Price Drops For Australia And Europe

wallitron writes: "Due to slow sales in Australia, Microsoft is looking to drop the price of it's XBox to $399 (around $200US). With a fast CPU, wizzy graphics card, ethernet, DVD and TV out, it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS. At that price it seems good value. Check out the article on the price drop." There are price drops in Europe, too.

560 comments

  1. redundant by awptic · · Score: 1, Redundant

    > There are price drops in Europe, too.
    Umm, yah, that is was in the title.

    1. Re:redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Prices have dropped to lower levels in AU - in the UK, they've gone from UKP300 to UKP200. So that's still somewhere near $US300.

    2. Re:redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but the title can't be a link!

  2. Impressive by qa'lth · · Score: 0, Troll

    700mhz cpu.. gf3 cpu... anorexic ram..

    I could build a better machine for pocket change.
    AND run a real OS on it.

    Which should I spend my money on?

    1. Re:Impressive by nonane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you forgot the 10 gig hard disk, dvd rom, ethernet controller and 256 channel dolby capable soround sound.

      2 sacks of pocket change should cover it.

    2. Re:Impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could run a real OS on the XBox too. Nothing's stopping you. Curious though, where are you buying your parts? Becuase I know it's not pricewatch.com - they're not cheap enough to put an xbox equiv. machine together for $200.

      http://www.artwerkz.com - paint with fractals
    3. Re:Impressive by jt007 · · Score: 1

      true, but it costs microsoft more than $200 to make an xbox. According to this article it is more like $425 per xbox. This price cut means that they are incurring an even bigger loss per unit.

      --
      I never apologise, I'm sorry but that's just the way I am - Homer
  3. From their adverts by os2fan · · Score: 3, Funny
    It seems that they keep a low profile. "Microsoft" is mentioned only in small letters.

    I think their adverts are not that subtle either: one of them runs along the "nice way to die" line. Maybe a 240 volts escaping through a programming hole?

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    1. Re:From their adverts by Deag · · Score: 1

      I don't know - I liked the ad where the young lad is born by being shot out of his mother, through the hospital wall, ages very rapidly and lands in a grave.

    2. Re:From their adverts by cscx · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention that because RCA really manufactures/designs the XBox. Microsoft is really the puppeteer to the puppet, as so to speak.

    3. Re:From their adverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Panasonic 3D0 box should've had a similar "nice way to die" tag line. Seeing as how I recieved a painful shock while holding the daisy chainable controller and brushing up against a staticly charged television screen.

    4. Re:From their adverts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, uh, duhh, NO, rca certainly did not design and doesn't manufacture the xbox. Thanks for playing "invent that gratuitious non-content." It's designed by MS and manufactured by flextronics.

  4. I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with US by Ryu2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    in terms of software, etc...

    Of course, Australia uses PAL, but is that what the XBOX uses as well (most TVs in Australia can display NTSC as well.) maybe I should just import one from Australia.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  5. This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Could the future bode ill for our intrepid heroes?

    1. Re:This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      Don't expect MS to give it up anytime soon. They got shitloads of more cash to throw at it than Sega had.
      IMHO MS need the xbox desperatly in order to sustain their stock value. PC market has slowed down therefore they need to move in to other areas.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    2. Re:This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Microsoft is looking at long term goals with the XBox, I don't think anyone thought the XBox would overtake teh PS2 for more reasons then I care to name here but if Microsoft were to release a backwards compatible XBox 2 and 3 with revamped hardware and additional network features they may have a chance to gain market share.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Microsoft is looking at long term goals with the XBox, I don't think
      >anyone thought the XBox would overtake teh PS2 for more reasons then I
      >care to name here but if Microsoft were to release a backwards
      >compatible XBox 2 and 3 with revamped hardware and additional network
      >features they may have a chance to gain market share.
      >
      >
      Bullshit. You PC gamers were spewing all kinds of BS about how the CRAPBOX was going to bury the PS2 with it's "Superior" Intel processor and overrated FPS's like Halo. Not only did the XBox did not make a dent in PS2 sales, PS2 literally strolled over to where XBox lay on the ground gasping for breath and kicked dirt in it's face.....

    4. Re:This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      MS released lowered earnings estimates before the market opened today and their stock is up(about 10 minutes before close right now). I hardly think they need the X-box to sustain their empire. Its success might help, but they don't need it "desperatly."

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
    5. Re:This is what Sega did before Dreamcast died by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      Ah, for the time being yes. but as the pc market gets saturated their only hope is either to get people into the upgrade treadmill with windows XP or expand to other markets. If they can't sustain their growth then their employees stock options will be useless - which means they have to start paying their emplyees more of their own money.
      MS can't survive as it is without growth.
      Now, this is off course only my own theiries around the matter and I might be completely off track ;-)

      Not that I think MS is going to disapear cmpletely, but I do think the same thing that happened to IBM will happen to them as well.

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  6. Amazing by cscx · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    With a fast CPU, wizzy graphics card, ethernet, DVD and TV out, it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS.

    If you are so f**king concerned with running Linux on your TV set in the living room, build a computer with a graphics card, ethernet, DVD, and TV out and hook it the fuck up to your TV set. Quit bitching about a what is in all reality A VIDEO GAME CONSOLE. It's not meant to be a PC.

    1. Re:Amazing by torndorff · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I dont believe they were complaining that it wouldnt run Linux, they were saying that it would be a "killer app" so to speak if it HAD an OS; with it there would be no other computer equipment needed for a family-solution. Don't be so quick to flame. ;)

    2. Re:Amazing by m_chan · · Score: 2

      I appreciate the sentiment of your post, though I think the economics may not bear out. That box _IS_ a pc, and a formidable unit, at that price point. It is also quite interesting from an economic standpoint to see Microsft taking such a bath on a product to penetrate an evolving market. Fun to pour some oil on that fire, no?

      Other posts have pointed out the fact that the sum of the parts is greater than the whole. At ~$200 it is quite the temptation to redirect the ends of the original means.

    3. Re:Amazing by xonker · · Score: 1

      While many people equate "real OS" with Linux, nowhere in the post does it mention Linux.

      He could have been referring to any OS, so why did you assume that he meant Linux?

      Oh - in reference to your sig - Konqueror isn't, AFAIK, 100% necessary for KDE, and I believe it (KDE) can be compiled without it. It's included for convenience sake by most Linux distributions - but it's not required for other KDE apps to function and can be left out. Linux users also have choice of desktops, so they can choose to use KDE or GNOME or XFce or fvwm or twm or IceWM or Enlightenment... Any OEM manufacturer who makes Linux boxen is absolutely 100% free to leave KDE or Konqueror off a machine, no one is abusing a monopoly to require its inclusion, so your pathetic little analogy doesn't hold up.

    4. Re:Amazing by maxmg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well... you could always get a PS2 and run Linux on that.
      I'm hoping for Sony to drop the PS2 prices as well, at least until they put MS out of business...

      Push to test." (click) "Release to detonate..."

      --
      I asked for a refund - and got my monkey back.
    5. Re:Amazing by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      Good point, exactly what I would have said.

    6. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not meant to be a PC.

      ah, but it IS a PC. I've ALREADY bought four of these, got them running together and between the water-cooling, overclocking, and SCSI-160 hookup, I've got the fastest computer server in the world for under $850 (and probably for the next 2 years!) You should see me play Quake III!

      Paint with fractals

    7. Re:Amazing by packeteer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      i agree with yu totally... first off i use konqueror... i kow ill get flamed for this cause you will say "but its slow" or whatever... but i dont care... im quite happy.... a monopoly is not really a bad thing... if somehow magically whenever there was a monopoly they made a good product nobody would complain... but alas a monopoly wont do that... so for all of you dont just say monopoly=bad all of a sudden... it COULD work but it doesn't... so if it DOES whats the biug deal... as soon a konqueror stosp being any good then fine... DROP IT and we will if that happens... so they DONT have a monopoly

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    8. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, when using debian, I used apt-get to get KDE (apt-get kdebase, IIRC), and the package did not include Konqueror. However, without Konqueror, I couldn't access the kde control panel.

      Peter

    9. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, bill's little gay fuck buddy is back. Its nice to see you repeat the M$ marketing like the good drone you are. No matter how much M$ tries to deny it, Xbox IS a pc.

    10. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put M$ out business? LOL. That's not gonna happen for a long long long time. And besides, I'd root for M$ over Sony any day.

    11. Re:Amazing by Toraz+Chryx · · Score: 2

      There's been something of a gap in the market since the Amiga evaporated, that gap being 'the home computer'

      a Gamecube on steroids with something like BeOS on it for around $450 would be vaguely doable, and there's a killing to be made IMO

    12. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dumb flamer. We're supposed to run Linux on everything. Just yesterday I successfully ported KDE 3.0 to my shoelaces. Still working on the doorstop distribution. Soon I'll be able to sed my lawn. Ph34r.

    13. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I right in thinking that buying a X-box and then buying no games for it will actually cause microsoft to lose money ?

    14. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and last time I checked, buying a 300$ piece of equipment for the sake of spiting a multi-billion dollar company causes you to lose money also.

    15. Re:Amazing by qshapadooy · · Score: 1

      YOU ARE SMART

    16. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly, then I'm all for the removal of Konqueror from KDE.

      You're confused, dude. You mix "abuse of a monopoly" with "a monopoly", and an "operating system" with "a desktop environment". See, if you have no monopoly, you can't abuse it.

      And even when you still wish to remove Konqueror from your pc, you can easily do so by removing the appropriate package. Still makes me wonder why you installed it in the first place...

      Perhaps because you don't fucking know what the fuck you're fucking talking about?

    17. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sure. So will you. They'll lose even more if you don't buy it at all, and you'll keep your money in your own pocket.

      Funny huh, how that works out.

    18. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THANK YOU

    19. Re:Amazing by tps12 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      they were saying that it would be a "killer app" so to speak if it HAD an OS

      "Killer app" means "killer application," which in turn implies some use of a technology that is desired by a lot of people, and not easily satisfiable otherwise. Even if you did install a general-purpose OS on your video game console and hooked it up to a TV, what do you have? Pretty much just a PC hooked up to a TV, which in itself is not all that exciting; it certainly doesn't demonstrate a "killer app." TiVo has a killer app, IMO, but the important part there is the monthly directory service and the software interface.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    20. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. For my $300 I get a DVD player, and a (more or less) general purpose PC. I also get to screw Microsoft. If that's not a bargain, I don't know what is.

    21. Re:Amazing by curtisk · · Score: 1

      >>He could have been referring to any OS, so why did you assume that he meant Linux?

      What website are we on?
      Who manufactures the xBox?
      Do you need any more clarification?

      LOL

      :p

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    22. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the only "killing" to be made with that idea is "killing the financial well-being of idiots who think that normal people have a use for obscure bundles of jargon." And if by "vaguely doable" you mean that "you have a vague idea of how doable it is," then you would be correct.

    23. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, calm down...it's only a games consol. maybe you should go for anger counselling.

    24. Re:Amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do the math. If you really want to screw them, you'd save your money and let them bear the full cost. Here, an example, since you don't quite get it:
      $300 + $x = m$'s cost

      If you cover their $300 cost, then you're just screwing yourself trying to screw them. What can you do with this? Can it run software or just DVD and games? It's better you let them screw themselves.

    25. Re:Amazing by xonker · · Score: 1

      Do you need any more clarification?

      Well, yes. Seriously - a lot of Slashdotters use Windows, a lot use Linux, a fair percentage use *BSD, a not insignificant number use MacOS, and there are smatterings of BeOS, OS/2, Solaris and even Amiga fanatics. While it's not wholly unreasonable to think that the poster meant Linux, I think it's churlish to make that as an assumption and proceed to berate the poster on that basis.

      Again, the XBox runs some kind of stripped down Windows, I think, but they could have meant "if XBox ran a real version of Windows" as well as "if XBox ran Linux." In fact, since the PS2 runs Linux, it's not unreasonable to wonder why the XBox can't/won't run Windows. Since virtually all the parts in the XBox are similar to PC hardware, Microsoft could produce a fuller version of Windows to run on it if they wanted to.

    26. Re:Amazing by packeteer · · Score: 1

      offtopic??? wtf... ok i used an example to prove my point... i know that konqueror is not technically related to microsoft... we were on the topic of microsoft and their monopoly and how it affects the worldwwide market... i simply used an example to prove my point that monopoly does not have to always be bad

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  7. Incentives by jeepthang · · Score: 1, Funny

    I still won't buy one unless there are cozy incentives. Something along the lines of smacking Bill Gates on the ass would suffice :)

    --
    -------------------------------
    High-Res Beer Bottle Collection
    1. Re:Incentives by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      We tried to work that into our last site license, but it didn't work out.

      Scott McNealy has offered to do some time in the dunking booth, though. In drag, even!

    2. Re:Incentives by fredrik70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well for every xbox sold MS loose money -it 's the games they make money at - so buy one for all means! Just don't buy the games.
      Making it run linux would be a nice littel project and quite a funny thing to do to MS ;-)

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  8. Cheap Hardware by LordArathres · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if the components are integrated inside, or can you start ripping things out. At $200 It might be worth it to start selling the stuff inside for money. Anyone out there know?

    Arathres

    1. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might get a 8GB hard drive out of it. The other components of value - the intel processor and the video card workings are supposedly proprietary. The DVD is probably all proprietary stuff - since it supposedly can spin both ways.

    2. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the drives but even they suck and are somewhat proprietary. Besides why would anyone need an 8 or 10 gig drive (different sizes are thrown in) or a dvd drive that scratches disks (as report in Japan)?
      -Krash

    3. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      When Microsoft starts making things that dont suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners.

      But vacuum cleaners do suck.

    4. Re:Cheap Hardware by atariboy · · Score: 1

      microsoft make vacuum cleaners?

    5. Re:Cheap Hardware by cyr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Everything is integrated on the motherboard (CPU, GPU, RAM...).

      The harddrive and DVD drive are more or less standard components with slightly altered firmware.

    6. Re:Cheap Hardware by morbid · · Score: 0

      I think the point is that the M$ ones would be broken by design, and hence not suck, so they would suck at being a vacuum cleaner or something.
      Hey, I've had my caffein this morning :-)

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    7. Re:Cheap Hardware by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      WHOOSH!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:Cheap Hardware by TardisX · · Score: 1
      Errr, that's the whole point of the joke.

      MS make things that don't work. I should have thought that was obvious.

      <boggles>

      --

      Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer
    9. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a frequent visitor of microsoft research facilities around the world (including the secret on in black mesa, nobody knows about that one becouse of the coverup after they tried and messed up big time working with the purest and potantially most untable copy of windows yet) I can reveal the folowing about their secret e-vaqDOTnet project. Remember that if you read this info and later work on any GPL code whatsoever our secret female assasins will be knocking on your door in minutes, they look cute but are deadly!
      The evaq.net does have a a gigbit ethernet internet link but no need for a power cord thanks to the new microsoft implementation of electricity over ip (it has some enhancement making compatibility with future power-over-ip products highy unlikely unless you are prepared to sign away your soul for our documentation)Furthermore it does in fact not suck! While it does offer the new houselayout.NET conectivity saturising the gigbit link by sending data regarding the layout of your home to microsoft.com (they have some huge unused datastorage facilities now they suspended hailtorm you know) Microsoft will use the collected data to compose more efficient hovering-plans.

      Posted as AC to protect my identity from the evil administrator!

      On the topic of removing hardware from the x-box, all chips (the copermine based special pentium 3 version, nforce like chipset and the memory) are soldered on the main pcb only the harddrive and dvd drive are interesting but the dvd has a special power connector so you wont be able to put it in a pc.

    10. Re:Cheap Hardware by rant-mode-on · · Score: 2, Funny
      • When Microsoft starts making things that dont suck is the day they start making vacuum cleaners.

      Apprently, they already sell vacuums
    11. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to clean a vacuum ?

    12. Re:Cheap Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And ironically, it's from Mac EvangeList, the shirt looks cool, but is way overpriced with little functionality. Just like a Mac!

  9. Re:rivisgay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    turismo is a little jug

  10. Re:rivisgay by nhewitt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    gtisgay

    --

    Nathaniel Hewitt
    "Having nothing, nothing can he lose." --Shakespeare

  11. EU regs? by olman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought I read that you can't dump a product on market in EU. That is, they can't sell it for less than the manufacturing costs. Apparently Xbox had at least an extra 100 on the price. For the new cost (299) it'd be almost worth it just for a DVD player.

    1. Re:EU regs? by Ryu2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to buy a DVD accessory (about US $30) to have DVD playback functions. It does not work straight out of the box, like Playstation 2.

      --
      There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get why so many Slashdotters bitch a fit over this issue (not saying you were, but many people do). If $30 is going to break you, then you probably shouldn't be buying video game systems. When I bought my PS2 I had to spend $30 on a memory card. Hark! But with the Xbox I would have saved that $30 cuz it has a built in hard drive. If I want a HDD for my PS2 I am going to have to wait 6 more months and shell out another $100. Microsoft might charge you extra for DVD (which comes with a remote BTW. Sony charges you $30 for a remote), but Sony charges you a total of $130 for features the Xbox already has. Quit yer bitchin', and stop going out of your way to find a reason to hate Microsoft.

    3. Re:EU regs? by BlackGriffen · · Score: 4, Informative

      M$ was already selling at a hefty loss (for some reason $100-$200 dollars comes to mind, but I'm not certain). This is standard practice in the console industry, though: sell the console as a loss-leader to make up profits in software royalties. Sony does it. Nintendo does it (though to a lesser extent). They were already basically dumping the XBoxes, and now they're trying to avalanche them.

      Hopefully they get sued, and are forced to sell at cost >:).

      BlackGriffen

    4. Re:EU regs? by Superkind · · Score: 1

      Uhm... I heard you need a special cable for the PS2 to play DVD, otherwise your picture gets all green.

      --
      (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
    5. Re:EU regs? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      my ps2 is the australian model but i've ben watching DVD's on it just fine

      straight out of the box.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    6. Re:EU regs? by Superkind · · Score: 1
      my ps2 is the australian model but i've ben watching DVD's on it just fine
      Okay, I heard that from the German version... a friend of mine got himself one, invited some friends for a nice DVD evening, set everything up, put in the disc, and the picture was all green. Then he just disconnected one of the pins from the video connection cable, and the picture was fine. :)
      --
      (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
    7. Re:EU regs? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      sounds like a faulty pin eh?

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    8. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAL PS/2's will play DVDs fine through composite or SVideo types connections. RGB results in a green tinged picture. This is deliberate by Sony apparently. This can be fixed using something like Datel's Action Replay or Region-X ... didn't know you could do it via pin snipping.

    9. Re:EU regs? by Kanon · · Score: 2

      That's because he was using an RGB scart cable. It's been deliberately crippled by Sony. To watch DVD they want you to use the crappy composite cable that comes with the unit.

    10. Re:EU regs? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "but Sony charges you a total of $130 for features the Xbox already has"? How much do you have to spend to get good games on your X-Box then? I've got 'em both - I play on the PS2. Nuff said.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    11. Re:EU regs? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "That is, they can't sell it for less than the manufacturing costs"

      What, you mean like mobile telephones?

    12. Re:EU regs? by David+Kennedy · · Score: 2

      >That's because he was using an RGB scart cable. It's >been deliberately crippled by Sony. To watch DVD >they want you to use the crappy composite cable that >comes with the unit.

      To clarify:
      1) You get a composite cable with the PS2.
      2) The composite is rubbish.
      3) You can play games with RGB.
      4) You cannot watch DVDs on a vanilla PS2 in RGB - the screen would be greened. This is "to prevent piracy" and is, IMO, a stupid decision.
      5) There are 3rd party ways around this OR
      7) Just use the almost-as-good SVHS cable instead.
      I've SVHS into a 36" TV, looks lovely and sounds good. Only one DVD/Audio-phile friend notices the
      difference.

    13. Re:EU regs? by prefect42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as I am aware, the anti-dumping legislation in the US is far more significant than elsewhere. I believe in the US though, anti-dumping laws only affected foreign companies. Yet another interesting US law that seeks to protect US business through block out clauses. Seems like the free market americans can't cope with their foreign counterparts...

      jh

      --

      jh

    14. Re:EU regs? by perky · · Score: 4, Informative

      The anti-dumping regulations are there to protect nascent european industry from foreighn competitors segregating markets and dumping excess capacity. Consequently your comment makes no sense at all. Europe doesn't have a console industry to protect, and the cost of Xboxes is now comparable with other geographical regions, so it is not possible to argue that the practise is dumping.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    15. Re:EU regs? by anshil · · Score: 2

      I thought I read that you can't dump a product on market in EU

      Wrong, there is nothing wrong mith low prices (even if below manufacturing costs. There is sometihng wrond and illegal with the technique called dumping. That is sell at very low prices to drive the competion out, and then to raise prices. The raising of prices is illegal and dumping then thus illegal but just low prices is okay, as long as you keep them.

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    16. Re:EU regs? by artg · · Score: 1

      > didn't know you could do it via pin snipping.

      SCART carries both RGB and composite (it can also carry SVideo by using some RGB pins). He probably snipped something that made the TV use RGB mode : it reverted to composite and the green was gone.

      In fact, he converted his nice RGB cable into a nasty composite one :-)

    17. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's true at least for France (for EU I'm not sure but pretty convinced it's the case too), u cannot sell things for less than the manufacturing cost.
      Actually for phones it's a bit different, they are sold to final customer for a (almost) ridiculous price but only because the telecom operator pay the difference between the retail price and the real price, and that's not the case with the Xbox...

    18. Re:EU regs? by AndrewRUK · · Score: 2, Informative

      The relevent bit of RU law, regulation 384/96 states that "an anti-dumping duty may be applied to any dumped product whose release for free circulation in the Community causes injury." (article 1(1))

      And injury is defined as meaning "material injury to the Community industry, threat of material injury to the Community industry or material retardation of the establishment of such an industry." (article 3(1))

      And dumping is "A product is to be considered as being dumped if its export price to the Community is less than a comparable price for the like product, in the ordinary course of trade, as established for the exporting country." (article 1(2))

      So, one way or another, the price drop is probably OK. Now, 299 is not much below the US price of $299 (according to this it's $266.17 as I write this) so whether dumping is happening is questionable. And also, given that selling below cost price is standard practice in the console industry, I would be doubtful as to whether the price drop causes injury, as defined above. And of course, there would need to be some EU console manufacturers (or at least, a fledgling industry) to hurt before anything could be done.

    19. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about taking a dump on consumers? They've got that one down pat.

    20. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "dump"? It seems the Euro makes your brains go soft!

    21. Re:EU regs? by nomadicGeek · · Score: 1

      It's not at all uncommon for a company to sell you a loss leader product so that you will buy other products.

      Game consoles are fairly expensive to manufacture and distribute. There is little money to be made on the hardware. Getting you to buy games for that platform is where the money is at. Once you recoup your development and marketing costs, its all gravy.

      Printers follow the same strategy. Do you really think they can make a profit on these things with the low prices? They make pleny of profit selling you the ink cartridges.

      Surely the EU regs have to take this type of common practice into account. Otherwise nobody would be able to sell razors in the EU.

    22. Re:EU regs? by Ahchay · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried to _buy_ a mobile phone?

      Do not confuse the prices you see on the high street with the actual cost of the phone. You can get a "free" phone in any high street phone shop in the UK, but you're not buying it - you're leasing it. It's not "free" it's "free, with a twelve month contract". There is a difference...

      If you try and buy a replacement for a lost or stolen phone, you'll get charged the actual cost of the unit.

      Cheers
      Chris

    23. Re:EU regs? by FireDancer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The law concerning dumping is that you cannot sell at lose AND sell below market price. With the X-Box at 299 (same as PS2), it's not under the market price, therefore it can be sold at loss.

    24. Re:EU regs? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Do not confuse leasing the phone, which you are NOT DOING, with getting it for free for signing this contract. You are tied into a 12 month AIRTIME contract, for which they give you the phone. IF you end the contract before the minimum period, they do not take the phone back, check your contract next time, dumbfuck

    25. Re:EU regs? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      You`ve already received one (rather charming) reply, which i mostly agree with. I`d also point out that after the year, you can often get a replacement phone cheap/free, depending on your average monthly bill.

    26. Re:EU regs? by jpatokal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "That is, they can't sell it for less than the manufacturing costs"

      What, you mean like mobile telephones?

      In a number of EU countries (like Finland, home of Nokia), it is illegal to subsidize phones with forced long-term subscriptions. This is not quite the same thing, but the net effect is the same: phones are sold at full price. Oddly enough, this actually increases competition, as hopping between operators is much easier.

      Cheers,
      -j.

    27. Re:EU regs? by haggar · · Score: 1

      For the new cost (299) it'd be almost worth it just for a DVD player

      I strongly disagree. You have to add the price of the remote control (without it you can't watch DVDs) and that costs 57 Euros here in Finland. Yes, in other countries it's cheaper, but it's still relevant.

      For that price (around 340 Euro) you can buy brand new DVD players where the region coding can be removed with the remote, and even the Macrovision protection, on some models. My colleague bought a Grundig DVD player where both region coding and Macrovision were removed with the use of the remote, for about 330 Euro.

      And you know what, the problems with scratched DVDs that are reported in Japan don't put any confidence in the Xbox. If I think it's going to ruin even one of my DVD movies, I don't want to risk it.

      --
      Sigged!
    28. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      article 1,2 doesn't apply to the x-box as.....

      Flextronics of course have a factory within the EU so microsoft can quite legally drop the price as low as they like, as long as they don't "dump" that is raise it later.

    29. Re:EU regs? by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      So?

      YOu have to buy a memory card for the GC or Ps2 to save games. The xbox hard drive has it built in. Not to mention to get 4 ports on the PS2 you have to buy a multi-tap. Xbox already has 4 ports. Plus no hard-drive or ethernet support on the ps2. Those are all expensive add-ons later on. Xbox is a better deal.

      Bravo

    30. Re:EU regs? by mark_space2001 · · Score: 1
      This is standard practice in the console industry, though: sell the console as a loss-leader

      This is incorrect. In fact, only two consolse have ever been sold at a loss. Sega's Dreamcast (they lost their shirts), and Microsoft's Xbox. Sony's PS2 is very cheap to make and actually turns a small profit.

      Selling below cost is a busines stratagy that should have died with the dot-com'ers.

      Thou has forsaken the Word of Gord. Repent ye!

    31. Re:EU regs? by ink · · Score: 1

      Except that the X-Box has only one "good" game, and that game is only good if you haven't been bored silly with FPS.

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    32. Re:EU regs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "How much do you have to spend to get good games on your X-Box then?

      The same as PS2. $50 per game. Dumbass.

    33. Re:EU regs? by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      I dont want to waste my time telling you how stupid that comment is however I will point you to this link.

      Xbox has plenty of good games and many good games to come. Including THPS3,NFL2k2,Max Payne,Rallisport challenge, Wrecless and the list goes on. Just wait for E3 and we'll see even more games coming out for the xbox.

      Bravo

    34. Re:EU regs? by Ringwraith · · Score: 1

      I don't know why everyone is always so excited that you have to buy a DVD accessory to play DVDs. This is no different -- price-wise -- than the PS2 making you buy a memory card if you ever want to save a game. Basically both consoles make you buy an extra controller and an extra accessory to get full functionality. (Assuming you want a DVD Player, anyway.)

      Of course, when Sony puts out the PS2 hard drive, the playing field will look a little different.

      --
      -- Hobbits suck!
    35. Re:EU regs? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      hmmm, I paid £20 for Gran Turismo 3 A-Spec. How much is Project Batman Racing again?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    36. Re:EU regs? by nadaou · · Score: 1

      Europe doesn't have a console industry to protect

      Surely Amstrad must be working on something?

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    37. Re:EU regs? by KITT_KATT!* · · Score: 1

      Microsoft was already subsidising the cost of the Xbox by $A200 each - but that's not the fully story. The manufacturer is a wholly owned subsidiary of Microsoft, so the subsidy is really only so their subsidiary can declare a profit.

    38. Re:EU regs? by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

      "Selling below cost is a busines stratagy that should have died with the dot-com'ers."

      Bad news. Loss leaders are an old business strategy. Automotive stores, for instance, sell motor oil at virtually nil profit or less. Grocery stores advertise sales on some items, but make up for it on others. It would be stupid to not sell the consoles on at least razor thin margins to try to get a big installed user base so that you can sell more software. Console companies don't really make money on the consoles, and they never have. They make money because they take a cut of the profits of all the games sold for their console. So even if they lose, say, $50 on the console, they make it up and then some if they make $10 on each game and the person buys more than 5 games over the time they own the console (most do).

      BlackGriffen

    39. Re:EU regs? by ink · · Score: 1

      Xbox has plenty of good games and many good games to come. Including THPS3,NFL2k2,Max Payne,Rallisport challenge, Wrecless and the list goes on. Just wait for E3 and we'll see even more games coming out for the xbox.

      Okay, I'll restate then: The XBox has only one good exclusive game. I can get everything in that list above on my PS2 or PC. Why should I buy an XBox for (again), one game?
      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  12. Links and cache.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Posting anonymously to avoid accusations of Karma Whoring..

    Somewhat relevant Slashdot article

    cache.

  13. How low can you go? by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Can they really make a profit by lowering prices like this? I thought the X-box was on a thin margin as it was. Maybe Microsoft just wants to get a foothold on the market and then make re-adjustments.

    1. Re:How low can you go? by kalislashdot · · Score: 1

      At $299 they already lose money. This is below cost already.

    2. Re:How low can you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argh! What is your .sig quoting!

      I can't for the love of god remember!

    3. Re:How low can you go? by charliem · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can never be accused of not knowing how to make money.

    4. Re:How low can you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simpsons. "Skinner's sense of snow."

      Season 12, I believe.

    5. Re:How low can you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they don't make profit on the consoles, but on the games.
      George

    6. Re:How low can you go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that all consoles were sold at a loss and costs recouped on the sales of software?

      Isn't this the standard business model for console sales?

    7. Re:How low can you go? by Bob[Bob] · · Score: 1

      All the console manufacturers sell the hardware at below cost - they don't bother trying to make money on the hardware. Instead, they make money on the licensing fees attached to the games - and given that Xbox games (in the UK, at least) cost around 45UKP (about 65USD), you can see how it can quickly add up...

  14. Previously stated strategy. by Matt2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, J Allard the head of MS' digital entertainment division (in charge of xBox) stated in a wired interview prior to the unit's release that he wanted to move prices down fairly rapidly, "to get the retail price to $100 as quickly as possible."

    This may be a little faster than they had hoped to lower the price, but MS knows it's gonna take heavy losses to get the market penetration required to start making serious money on the software.

    --

    1. Re:Previously stated strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can they drop the price to $100 when a Win2k License costs at least that much? Don't tell me Micro$oft is giving away free copies of their precious OS?!?!

  15. $399 ? by rsborg · · Score: 0, Troll

    Are those 399 of them newfangled Euro-dollars???

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    1. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Dollars!
      It's Euros and (fucking shit) cents.

    2. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No it's Aussie dollars. The price in Europe is going to be 299 Euros around 260 US Euros.

    3. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may of been 399 Euro dollars. But last time I checked Australia isn't in Europe. It isn't even in the same hemisphere.

      Dumbarse.

    4. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh clever and tasteful k5 reader, a snippet of information for you. Euros are from Europe.

      Australia is not part of Europe. Part of the U.S., well, almost, but sadly we don't get to use their currency yet.

    5. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I don't want to be part of Jewmerica.

    6. Re:$399 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may of been 399 Euro dollars
      You mean 399 Euros...

  16. At least.. by dr_labrat · · Score: 3, Informative

    The users that were overkeen and bought one before the price cut (I think there were eight of them) wil be compensated:

    "Those who have already bought the console at the higher price will, luckily, be compensated. Anyone who already has an Xbox, or buys one before April 25th, will receive two free games and a free controller"

    --
    The secret of success is honesty and fair dealing. If you can fake those, you've got it made. (Marx)
    1. Re:At least.. by CurlyG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow! Does that mean they've release another game for the XBox? Or do you just get 2 copies of Halo?

      --
      You know they call 'em fingers but I've never seen 'em fing. Oh, there they go.
    2. Re:At least.. by 1Oman · · Score: 1

      ok i laughed put loud, this is my kind of sarcasm.

    3. Re:At least.. by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Heh heh. I laughed really hard on that one. You've made my day, CurlyG.

    4. Re:At least.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with the other 2. One of the VERY few jokes on /. I've laughed at.

  17. Free Xboxes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just another example of M$ doing whatever it takes to make a dent in the console market. I wouldn't be surprised if they drop the price further if this doesn't spurt sales.
    Heck I wouldn't be surprised if they started giving them away free if it gets really bad, just so they can make a dent on their installed base! IE all over again

    1. Re:Free Xboxes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is so unfair.
      We need legislation to allow Sony, Nintendo and Sega to lower the prices of their consoles as well. It is unjust that they have been prevented from doing so before.

  18. How to kill Microsoft by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 5, Funny

    How to kill Microsoft

    Step 1) Earn $400 billion
    Step 2) Buy 1 billion X-boxes and use them as computers, without buying any games
    Step 3) Watch as Microsoft begins to collapse upon itself since it loses money on each unit!
    Step 4) Tell all your buddies that Microsoft is dying and that they should switch to the superior Linux OS
    Step 5) Play Tux Racer
    Step 6) Repeat step 5

    You have completed the six step program. Microsoft is now dead! Have a nice day!

    1. Re:How to kill Microsoft by pompomtom · · Score: 1

      You forgot writing put options the whole way... may as well get your dosh back.

      --

      Buckets,

      pompomtom

      "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
    2. Re:How to kill Microsoft by yobbo · · Score: 2

      unfortunately, intel and nvidia's production capacity would ruin your plan :( Laws of supply and demand would net a very healthy profit for MSFT.

      it was noble tho...

    3. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What is it with Tux Racer??

      I attempted to play Tux Racer and I got bored pretty quickly. I got through maybe one full hour of gameplay and didn't even make the cut to get an icon in my gnome panel.

      Now, I have SSX Tricky for PS2 and thought it would in no way inspire me but I became addicted because of the great soundtrack, the hidden courses, the various players with different physics depending on board, etc... If Linux advocates *insist* on claiming that Tux Racer is on par with games that could be obtained via the consoles then they're smoking some of that Hawaiian shit that my friends have all supposedly sampled with their girlfriends in Canada.

      The best way to advocate Linux is to say, "This is what it's capable of..." but if you put Tux Racer into the hands of a 19 year old telling them, "don't look at the EVIL Microsoft Borg-ware, look at this great game!" then you, my friend, are soon to be extint.

      ~~~~~~~

      You know what scares the hell out of me? You know what keeps me up at night? The fact that 30 years from now, these kids will be running things. These kids will be modding my posts on slashdot.
      - Michael Sims
    4. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Cyph · · Score: 2

      Bah, if I can get Step 1 completed, I won't bother killing Microsoft, I'll buy myself a small third-world country. :P

    5. Re:How to kill Microsoft by FarHat · · Score: 1

      Bah, if I can get Step 1 completed, I won't bother killing Microsoft, I'll buy myself a small third-world country. :P

      You could buy a first world country for much less than that. You just have to buy the politicians and they are going pretty cheap these days.

      --
      At the intersection of computation and biology.
    6. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can break down Step 1 into three steps.

      1) Give software away for free
      2) ????
      3) Profit!!!

    7. Re:How to kill Microsoft by 56ker · · Score: 2

      What's MSFT?

    8. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just two problems: 1. getting that 400 billion 2. microsoft hasn't manufactured 1 billion x-boxes and never will

    9. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Triones · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has fewer than 40,000 employees. With 400 billions, you can offer 10 millions to each of them to resign on the same day (to join your own company if you like). (a more efficient scheme is to offer each one 50 times of his/her annual salary.)

    10. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 2

      It's the stock symbol for Microsoft. Part of an annoying trend of companies being called by their stock call letters instead of their actual name. My bank (the Bank of Montreal, one of Canada's "big 6" banks) is now called BMO by everyone including the employees. it took me a while to find out why they didn't call it BOM (a much more logical acronym). There must already be a BOM stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    11. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Marticus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Step 5) Play Tux Racer
      Step 6) Repeat step 5

      You have completed the six step program. Microsoft is now dead! Have a nice day!


      Since we have '6 GOTO 5' how can we complete this six step program?
      Oh, wait I forgot, Linux is so fast it can complete an infinite loop in 5 seconds :)

    12. Re:How to kill Microsoft by ddent · · Score: 2

      Lots of people think this frequently. But you have to realize that this actually helps Microsoft. 1) A negligable amount of people will do this 2) You add to the marketshare count, needed to get titles and 3) You give them greater economies of scale -- thats the biggie. Its actually beneficial to them :).

    13. Re:How to kill Microsoft by doubtless · · Score: 1

      I am a programmer, shit, I'm stuck in a Step 5, Step 6, Step 5, Step 6, Step 5, Step 6, Step 5....

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    14. Re:How to kill Microsoft by jroller · · Score: 1

      At least you're stuck playing tux racer. I got stuck one time doing Lather, Rinse. Prune city.

    15. Re:How to kill Microsoft by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      Could also have been they didn't like the connotation of BOM and bomb?

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    16. Re:How to kill Microsoft by flewp · · Score: 2

      Depending on where in Canada, that Hawaiian shit would be schwag. Then again though, on average, the common stuff from BC (beasters) is usually the lowest form of dank around. Time for me to shut up and goto bed.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    17. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Cenam · · Score: 0

      why not kill microsoft the easy way, make an os that is userfriendly, looks nice, and has something over windows(linux dosn't meet any of these other than maybee the last, speed - which most users couldn't care less about).

      --

      The Truth: There is no string:)
    18. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget to steal underpants while your at it, just for fun!

    19. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSX tricky - oh, please, how many real snowboarders manage to take off their board in mid jump and spin it around underneath them ....I know these games make it easy to be incredibly good, such as effortlessly pulling off 720's etc. but there has to be a limit...
      On the other hand, I like the way the carving boards "feel" different to the freestyle boards.....

    20. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anthony · · Score: 1

      Katakana pr0n sigs. What'll they think of next...

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
    21. Re:How to kill Microsoft by OpenSourcerer · · Score: 1

      don't worry, sooner or later...

      Step 5, "BAAM" Segfault: core dumped!

      its tux racer we are talking about!

    22. Re:How to kill Microsoft by anshil · · Score: 1


      Step 1) Earn $400 billion

      Maybe I'm thinking in the wrong dimensions, but I think with that amunt of money you con simply buy any microsoft share on the free stock exchange. However I don't know if that sufficies for a takeover, anybody know how many percent of their shares are traded freely? What the net would cost, including the strong raise when slurping them all?

      --

      --
      Karma 50, and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt.
    23. Re:How to kill Microsoft by wheany · · Score: 1

      Step 5) Play Tux Racer

      Or you could play some good game. Hey, as much as I love to hate Microsoft, at least I don't have to pretend I'm playing good games.

      Well, just keep playing Tux Racer and BZFlag. I'm sure if you try hard enough, you will eventually truly believe they are good...

    24. Re:How to kill Microsoft by doofusclam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are really sad.

      Yeah I know this is a geek-oriented site but - for the love of Jehovah or whoever - quit bitching about MS. They came up with a great product at a cheap price that is now even cheaper.

      If any multi-millionaire was as grim as you are and actually bought all these X-Boxen they'd be idiots. I'd rather they gave the money to charity rather than spend it on a beef with BillG.

      And who mentioned Tux-Racer? Listen, I love the idea of Linux as much as the next geek but how *average* is that game? And thats the best they can come up with?

      Grow up guys!(you are all guys, aren't you??)

      - seany.

    25. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MicroSoft Fuels Trolls.

      I thought everybody knew that ;-)

    26. Re:How to kill Microsoft by artg · · Score: 1

      You add to the marketshare count, but after a few months the games publishers realise that you're not buying any games (and MS don't get any royalties). So they stop developing, and MS have to scrape egg off their face.

      However, you can get almost as good a result by simply not buying the consoles. After they've sat on the shelves for months and been dumped for $50, MS have lost a lot of money, too.

      And Flextronics, who probably spent a huge amount setting up a line to build the things and don't have a clawback contract, will have gone bust.

    27. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of the Steve Martin bit "How to be a millionaire and pay no taxes":

      1) First, become a millionaire
      2) ...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    28. Re:How to kill Microsoft by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      I am a programmer, shit, I'm stuck in a Step 5, Step 6, Step 5, Step 6, Step 5, Step 6, Step 5....

      With the 400 billion $ from step 1) you don't have that much to worry.

    29. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >SSX tricky - oh, please, how many real snowboarders manage to take off
      >their board in mid jump and spin it around underneath them ....I know
      >these games make it easy to be incredibly good, such as effortlessly
      >pulling off 720's etc. but there has to be a limit...
      >
      I'ld like to see the real snowboarders try some the SSX tricky stuff in real life. The genepool can afford the loss....

    30. Re:How to kill Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Tux Racer is infinite in itself so you never reach step 6.

  19. US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by jcsehak · · Score: 2

    This is $100 cheaper than the US version. What's to stop Americans from getting a PAL --> NTSC converter and ordering one from Australia? Are there any other differences? Is the DVD playback just region [AUS]? If so, maybe there's a mod to get around it?

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different region, for DVD's and games. I don't know about you, but if you've ever played a PAL version of a fighting game, you'll be wishing you never left NTSC land.

      Most PAL conversions are so shitty that the timings are way off, and nobody bothers to fix it. Imagine Tekken 4 at 75% speed and you get an idea.

    2. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than the PAL-->NTSC converter, you would also need at least a plug adapter for the electricity cable. Probably also a transformer as Australia uses 240V, unless the XBOX comes with a switchable power supply.

    3. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read a review of Halo for the Australian X-Box. Framerates was the critisism for it. They said the NTSC version is excelent, and the PAL version is chuggy, and slow. They do say that you get used to it, but why should I have to get used to it? It's a console. Everything should work smoothly and without problems.

      This is probably why it has bombed so badly.

    4. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAL to NTSC converters are $100 in the electronics stores. This may sound like a losing incentive to purhase an XBox from Europe, but think of it this way...Buy your XBox from Europe and receive a free module to guaruntee the ability to use your XBox on both PAL and NTSC monitors, instead of buying the XBox from United States or Japan and being limited to use the XBox within only those regions' hotels.

    5. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by (outer-limits) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is pretty crazy considering that PAL actually gives you a better picture than NTSC.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    6. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PAL stuff is also higher res. Ha!

    7. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      $200 X-Box + $10-$30 PAL to NTSC Converter + Shipping + Customs MUST = More than $300. Toss in the region mod and you might as well just buy an American X-Box and then wipe your ass with thirty or forty bucks.

    8. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DVD region is only set when you first setup DVD playback with the DVD controller. Shipping for that enormous beast would be $300 so it would make no sense buying it from Australia

    9. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by wheany · · Score: 1

      I theory, yes, but in practice, most publishers just drop the framerate from 60 to 50, slowing the game down by the same amount, and chop off the top and bottom of the screen.

      It sucks, I know...

    10. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by El+Cabri · · Score: 1

      TVs sold in the US usually cannot display PAL.

    11. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by O_Sleep · · Score: 1

      PAL runs at a higher resolution but lower refresh rate then NTSC.

      I would rather not have a lower refresh rate on my tv, it's already pretty low.

    12. Re:US: why not buy AUS X-boxen? by Tuan+Jim · · Score: 1

      You'd probably be surprised by this, but the xbox already converts NTSC-> PAL and vice versa. You can check that with any HK R0 dvd for proof. The thing that currently limits multi-region dvd viewing is the remote dongle. If you buy a R1 dvd kit and plug it in, it currently locks the system to R1 (same as the R2 Japan, R4 Australia, etc). I've been checking out a lot of forums and I have yet to hear of anyone cracking the region viewing for this, though there is supposedly one coming out in the UK http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&thr eadid=191901 Haven't heard anything concrete about game importing either. I'm pretty sure most games produced so far are region specific, but that developers have been encouraged/given the option to leave out region encoding in the future.

      Tuan Jim

  20. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know they are not compatable.

    The X-Box was only released here a month ago, and I remember reading some articles on what you had to do to get a US X-Box working here. Basically I think it was a major pain in the butt, and unless you were really keen not worth it.

    On another note, this price drop has a this guy spitting blood. He purchased the X-Box at the full price. Now he has realised it was a waste of money and was going to try and sell it before everyone else worked that out. Seems he was too late. This price drop means he will lose a lot more money than he wants too. Now he's stuck with an over priced console he hates.

    He hates MS even more now.

  21. If the Price Cut Comes Stateside... by mgrochmal · · Score: 1

    It would certainly make purchasing an Xbox a bit more appealing. Mind you, this would put a lot of Xbox hopefuls in the same boat when Sony announced they can make PS2 chips cheaper. Perhaps too little, too late. From several articles that are indicating waning Xbox sales and other hits against the Xbox, perhaps the price cuts will help people look past the Xbox's faults. A few more killer apps wouldn't hurt, either.

    --
    This .sig Intentionally Left Blank.
    1. Re:If the Price Cut Comes Stateside... by IpalindromeI · · Score: 2, Funny

      A few more killer apps wouldn't hurt, either.

      *nod* They should port Office to it!

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
  22. Re:rivisgay by granturismo · · Score: 0, Troll

    nathan you will always amaze me with yer blatant homosexuality

    --
    Nathaniel Hewitt is a homosexual.
  23. Port box by Reverend+Raven · · Score: 1, Troll

    The X-box is nothing more than a port system. Lack of original, exclusive games that people want, coupled with it's PC-lite interface make it a handy attraction to Edios and Activision and others looking to make a quik few bucks by porting some of their PC/PS2 titles.

    This is a last ditch effort to boost sales in third markets while ignoring the total lack of sales in Japan, and the poor sales here in America. After E3 when Sony announces the Playstation 2's price drop, Microsoft will either follow suit (only a few months after launch for a price drop sure would piss off a number of folks) or suffer the consiquences of being $50-$100+ above the cost of the PS2 and Nintendo's Gamecube. Wither and die, shitty port box. ;)

    --

    --Reverend Raven
    Desperate days demand dire deeds.
    1. Re:Port box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a PS2 and an xbox, and am more interested in future xbox games than anything coming solely to Sony's machine. Once gta3 comes out for the xbox I won't touch my playstation.

      I could care less for all the japanese games that are released on the playstation. The one I'd want - the new Gran Turismo Concept won't reach the american stores till a year after it was released, if the Japs decide to bring it over at all. While I'm playing Rallisport Challenge now, with graphics beyond what 10 playstation 2's could do.

      xbox won't die for two reasons - it is doing alot better then the gamecube everywhere except Japan, where the Gamecube is barely above the xbox in sales. The other thing is that owners of both machines, like myself, will always buy the xbox game over the ps2 version. Sony does not have any games they make themselves other then Gran Turismo.

    2. Re:Port box by Superkind · · Score: 1
      The X-box is nothing more than a port system. Lack of original, exclusive games that people want, coupled with it's PC-lite interface make it a handy attraction to Edios and Activision and others looking to make a quik few bucks by porting some of their PC/PS2 titles.
      You don't do much console-gaming, do you? Things you can do on your PC suck on a console, and vice versa. I played Halo on the Xbox, and... well. The game might be good if it was a PC game. You can't play FPS' without a mouse and a keyboard. And on the other hand I also played Wreckless (which beats the shit out of your GF4), and I could never imagine playing that on a PC. You simply lack the controller. And besides, game-programming for a console differs a lot from game-programming on a PC.
      --
      (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
    3. Re:Port box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > This is a last ditch effort to boost sales in third markets while ignoring the total lack of sales in Japan

      Immediate consequences of this price cut in Europe and Oz:

      * No one will buy an XBox until at least 26th in Europe and Oz (unless they can't read).

      * Existing customers will be pissed off that they spent too much.

      * US and Japan customers will hold off buying until they, too, get the price cut.

      * Retailers will get pissed off because they will have to write down stock to below cost.

      * Retailers will re-assign shelf space away from XBox to something that is selling.

      * Europe will add an anti-dumping duty because it is below cost, bringing the price back up and pissing off the customers because it won't be available at the reduced price.

      * Oz will be the only market to keep the new low price and the rest of the world will think that their XBox price is a rip-off.

      Great move Microsoft.

    4. Re:Port box by Felius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many of the console games in development at the moment are planned for release on all three consoles. The launch titles for the X-Box are pretty uninspiring, but it's early days yet.

      Microsoft are in a much better position than they'd have been in if Sony had used their extra year of time with the PS2 on the market effectively.

      Personally I'm leaning toward buying a Gamecube. This change in price brings the X-Box down to the same price, but I just prefer Nintendo's style (and franchise characters).

      Having 3 consoles on the market is doing great things as far as I'm concerned, as a gamer. When you can develop a game for one of two systems, often you'll only do one. But if sticking to one system cuts you out of a large portion of the market, you're more likely to develop for them all.

      --
      ..and I'll form the head!!
    5. Re:Port box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I could never imagine playing that on a PC. You simply lack the controller.

      Any controller that can be made for a console, can be made for a PC.

      And besides, game-programming for a console differs a lot from game-programming on a PC.

      It doesn't have to. If you use a standard library that is compatable across a console and a PC then the same code will work for both.

  24. Free Xboxes by Araxen · · Score: 1

    Just another example of M$ doing whatever it takes to make a dent in the console market. I wouldn't be surprised if they drop the price further if this doesn't spurt sales. Heck I wouldn't be surprised if they started giving them away free if it gets really bad, just so they can make a dent on their installed base!

    1. Re:Free Xboxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called giving away the razor to sell the blades, and its a common practice in the video game industry.

      Companies make money on the games, not the consoles.

      But of course, MS is EVIL!!!

      lol

    2. Re:Free Xboxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if I keep refering to Microsoft as M$ will my friends think I'm cool like you?

  25. thank you for putting that straight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love linux, don't get me wrong, but when people want everything and the kitchen sink running it, they are fucking nuts. Yes I liked imdrema or whatevey it was called but that was designed as a linux running box in the first place. "Real Operating system" my ass. Doesn't the Xbox use the Windows Kernel or something like that? Windows isn't that bad. It has one major thing that Linux lacks, user friendlyness (somewhat). Most people are just so scared of it, they think they need help instead of figuring it out on their own.

  26. As if the OS matters... by dylan95 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS.

    Why would it matter what OS it runs? If it used Linux instead, it wouldn't suddenly have more functionality. It wouldn't suddenly have the ability to open your curtains or turn on your coffee machine. It already does what it's supposed to do: play games.

    No console game player should ever care what OS their game system uses.

    (I wonder if the Indrema never came to light because they expected gamers to manually mount the DVD drive before playing each game.)

    1. Re:As if the OS matters... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      If it ran Linux, it would be really easy (Read cheap) for developers to port games from the X-Box to Linux. No more dual booting to play CS Steam. Just a few more A-List titles coming out natively for Linux and I'm there baby!

    2. Re:As if the OS matters... by lhaeh · · Score: 0
      Actually Linux can make coffee.

      Maybe this would be useful during late night warthog jumping. practice.

    3. Re:As if the OS matters... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I wonder if the Indrema never came to light because they expected gamers to manually mount the DVD drive before playing each game.)

      Quibble. Indrema went kaput because their last release date put it, IIRC, a little before the Xbox and Gamecube release dates. So a new console with almost no support, for more money, up against two marketing behemoths. Somebody at Indrema suffered from a fit of sanity and realized they were going to get squashed like a bug.

  27. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by toopc · · Score: 2, Informative
    On another note, this price drop has a this guy spitting blood. He purchased the X-Box at the full price. Now he has realised it was a waste of money and was going to try and sell it before everyone else worked that out. Seems he was too late. This price drop means he will lose a lot more money than he wants too.

    This guy should know that if he has his receipt Microsoft will give him 2 XBox games and an extra controller for free. They're doing this for all early adopters who bought an XBox beore the price break in Austrailia and Europe.

    A big Thank You to all Xbox gamers!

    As a big "THANK YOU" to everyone who bought an Xbox before 26th April we are offering, until 1st July 2002, the chance for you to get 2 games and an Xbox Controller for FREE! That means you could be playing games like Halo, Rallisport Challenge, Project Gotham Racing, Amped, Oddworld or Dead or Alive 3 amongst other great games for free!

  28. Good Old EULA by Renraku · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'll bet the EULA for an X-box strictly forbids that you purchase them somewhere other than within a 50 mile radius from your house or some other draconian rule. This is so Microsoft can control their prices and legally bust people who don't want to pay $300 for an X-box and just go to to buy one for $200. It wouldn't surprise me a bit.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Good Old EULA by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How can you be bound by a EULA at the time you buy something? (I'm honestly just curious. It would seem that the EULA could have no effect on where you buy something, because you hadn't agreed to it at that point. Am I wrong?)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    2. Re:Good Old EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, that was funny. :)

      But they probably won't put such restrictions in the EULA after all. Limiting purchase to a defined geographic area would, in fact, be illegal. Even M$ can't be that dumb.

    3. Re:Good Old EULA by DavidpFitz · · Score: 2

      You're wrong :-)

      Well, you could refuse the EULA and get your money back. Same with Office, when you read the EULA you can disagree with it and return the product for a full refund -- but it's a hassle and a half.

      I'm sure you could also inspect the EULA before you purchase if you wanted to.

    4. Re:Good Old EULA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly person. No - the EULA states you can only run the game on your own machine and that machine must not be moved, _ever_ from its original domicile.

  29. Dumping added to AntiTrust by bstadil · · Score: 1

    Selling below cost might not be such a smart move by Microsoft. The EU is currently investigating what to do on AntiTrust. The EU has fairly effective dumping remedies, that has been enforced quickly. The KOrean Memory manufacturers had to face this a few times. The Xbox is made in Hungary and Mexico that could face retaliatory responses in addition to MS fines.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Dumping added to AntiTrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, but if I remember correctly, you cannot dump in order to compete against products from EU manufacturers, as in this case there are no EU manufacturers of consoles, the dumping law wouldn't apply.

      I could well be wrong about that though ;)

    2. Re:Dumping added to AntiTrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US this would be called dumping, if Microsoft were a foreign manufacturer and there was a domestic manufacturer of game consoles. This is how the japanese companies torpedoed the domestic us consumer electronic industry before they were finally restrained.

      Of course, how EU considered dumping and anti-trust I am uncertain. The EU anti-trust, unlike US anti-trust, is concerned directly with harm to competitors rather than indirectly by providing harm to consumers the way it is in the US. However, since there are no EU companies that are console manufacturers being harmed, I am not sure if they have any legal basis to intervene or even interest in protecting the Japanese.

      I doubt you will see a price drop like this in Japan, because certainly Sony would just call it's friends in the govt and if they don't have anti-dumping laws you can be sure they will very quickly. The relationship between industry and govt in Japan is very different than either here or in Europe. It would also be sweet revenge for them, having finally been hit at the other end after they trashed the us market, and they also know how very effective dumping can be if left unchecked :).

  30. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He would do that. Except when he purchased it he already has the Extra controller, DVD thing and a couple of other extras. This extra pack they are giving out is pretty worthless.

  31. Beating a dead horse? by awptic · · Score: 2

    They must be desperate to make sales, their already selling these things at a huge loss. It seems like
    microsoft is beating a dead horse with this one; nobody's really buying them, and their's shit all for games
    compared to the competition, even fewer worth paying for. I for one am glad to see them failing, the more
    markets left open to fair competition the better. But, like most other markets microsoft treads on,
    they'll probably keep trying til they get it right, and if history has taught me anything.. they will,
    eventually; IE was a piece of crap until version 3, windows 95 was terrible, etc. Afterall,
    they have billions and billions of dollars to throw at the problem.
    I really hope the justice department can get their shit together and do something soon.

    1. Re:Beating a dead horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is quite willing to buy its own units and dump them in the garbage bin just to increase sales. That's like buying votes in an election, but in this case it's legal. Costs them $300 per extra vote for Xbox. What we're seeing is just the beginning of it, at $100 per vote.

    2. Re:Beating a dead horse? by patoco12 · · Score: 1

      they'll probably keep trying til they get it right

      How is this illegal/bad business? Say what you want about Microsoft, but they want to make money first, THEN care about the nerds. Sounds like good business to me. Microsoft SHOULD do what it can to make the XBOX a success.

    3. Re:Beating a dead horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but that won't sell any games, which will royally piss off the software companies; MS will have to buy all the games as well!

    4. Re:Beating a dead horse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This doesn't make sense to the typical slashdot monkey. Most of these sheep/monkey hybrids don't know why they hate Microsoft other than slashdot tells them too, so they come to the conclusion that success == evil.

      Dumbasses.

  32. I wonder how this will go down for Nintendo... by Xenex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been planning on buying a GameCube for quite a while now, infact I pre-ordered (May 17th launch in Australia, I don't want one enough to spend $AU1000 importing, blah blah etc) several months ago.

    As far as I recall, the launch price for the GameCube in Australia is going to be $399. Whenever I've told people that price, then compared to the $799 Xbox, people would be shocked. Then they'd realise they could get a GameCube and a couple of games for the same price as a gameless Xbox. I know first-hand of a couple of people that have held back and waited for a GameCube because of this.

    All well, there'll be two interesting things to observe from this: Nintendo's reaction, and early Xbox adopters' reactions.

    I wonder if Nintendo will drop their GCN launch price now? To be honest, I don't think they have much of a choice if they want to remain competitive. As for the Xbox owners: They get what they deserve! Err, seriously though, I bought a Nintendo 64 on March 7th 1997 (a week after the launch in Australia) for $399. 3 months later, the price dropped to $299. Nintendo had a very quiet promotion of "free game for early adopters". It's where my copy of Mario Kart 64 is from.

    I wonder if Microsoft will do the same now?

    1. Re:I wonder how this will go down for Nintendo... by Xenex · · Score: 2

      Err, I have no idea why I typed $799. The Xbox is $649 in Australia.

      Excuse my error.

    2. Re:I wonder how this will go down for Nintendo... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      The Xbox is $649 in Australia.

      Better change that to was. :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  33. Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by smallstepforman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If I were Michael Dell or Ted Waitte (Gateway), I would be on 'red alert', so to speak. Microsoft are literally giving hardware away and establishing themselves with a box in every living room. An XBox upgrade kit in the future (with a USB keyboard and mouse, maybe throw in WindowsXBox and a lite version of XBox Office) and suddenly you have proprietry hardware running a proprietry OS. Future versions of desktop Windows will have terrible driver support or hardware crippling commands for Dells and Gateway, making them seem slower, while uncrippled Xbox drivers will run at normal speed (which will seem very fast for normal users).

    Microsoft are positioning themselves to be a hardware company, muscling Dell and Gateway out the PC business. The next M$ monopoly will be on PC hardware. A one stop solution, so to speak - Microsoft will supply the OS, hardware and software.

    --
    Revolution = Evolution
    1. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of another fruity company that I support... what's their name again?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    2. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Bytenik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK now, cut that out. April 1st was a few weeks ago. I get the feeling, however, that you aren't joking.

      These products serve vastly different markets. Putting a keyboard and mouse on an XBox does NOT make it nearly as versatile as a PC. Set top boxes have tried that several times and failed. Why?

      Where's my XBox? In the living room.

      Where's my PC? In my office.

      When I'm surfing the web or writing an email on my XBox, nobody else can watch TV.

      I also don't have as much privacy, and I don't have anywhere convenient to put the mouse or keyboard.

      Get it?

      --

      "Scientists prove we were never here."
      -- Devo

    3. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by ChadN · · Score: 1

      But who is to say that Dell and/or Gateway wouldn't want a piece of the set top box market (in the future, if it ever looks remotely lucrative), but then they would have to compete against microsoft (if the hypothesized home appliance is realized). Furthermore, sales of the xbox might conceivably cut into their PC sales right now; why buy a PC for games, if the whole xbox deal is cheaper. So, I'm sure they are very concerned about how the XBox could affect them.

      I would imagine many parents are deciding that rather than buy a "PC" system that only plays games, they could spend a bit more for a ultra-cheap PC, and hope the kids might learn something rather than zone-out in front of games all day. Especially in a tight economy, I'd spent money on something that is (theoretically) practical, rather than an expensive toy, even if it cost a bit more. Xbox prices will have to drop a lot before they "take off". But I expect they will eventually gain a foothold, as the games mature.

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    4. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Microsoft are positioning themselves to be a hardware company"

      Then all the Apple zealots will accuse Microsoft of copying them again!

    5. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by geekoid · · Score: 2

      so what your saying is that MS wants to be like Apple, only crappy.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Cenam · · Score: 0

      hes saying they wanna be the good version of apple, though it's not what thier tring to do, and thier already better than apple.

      --

      The Truth: There is no string:)
    7. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would just result in killing Windows, and
      leaving the door open to other operating systems(Linxu, BSD ...)
      Do you think that Microsoft would do this?

    8. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apricot?

    9. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      Ha ha. Those of use old enough to remember these things will know that just over 20 years ago, MS really were a hardware company. Their biggest seller back then was an expansion board for the Apple II that allowed users to run z80 (CP/M type stuff) on that machine. Then some d0rk from IBM came along and offered them a software contract... and you know the rest.

    10. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      Pink triangle?

      http://www.pink-triangle.com/home.html

    11. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that would be swell.
      i hate when people reply with "No we only support the PC platform" when I'm asking if it support linux.

    12. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Hard_Code · · Score: 2
      These products serve vastly different markets. Putting a keyboard and mouse on an XBox does NOT make it nearly as versatile as a PC. Set top boxes have tied that several times and failed. Why?

      Where's my XBox? In the living room.

      Where's my PC? In my office.

      When I'm surfing the web or writing an email on my XBox, nobody else can watch TV.

      I bet these distinctions don't matter quite as much to the masses that use their PC as an overpowered AOL terminal. Microsoft is in an *excellent* position to, er, position, XBox as the central household "computer appliance" (and they've even hinted as much).

      XBox IS nearly as versatile as a PC because it is made out of commodity PC parts! Games are just bait to get it in the living room. Then they integrate internet connectivity, and TiVO capabilities, and BLAM, one-stop computer appliance monopoly. It also is a great way to wedge in their new "software-as-service" concept. Once you have your XUniversalBox, whaddya gonna do if you need upgraded software? You think every schmoe out there is gonna crack open their XBox just to upgrade software ("wait, we can't do this, it's an 'appliance', it'll void our warranty")? No, they are going to shell out a fee, and download the newer software from MS.

      Of course, get enough of these in the hands of geeks and this could backfire horribly for MS 8)
      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    13. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Do you think that's air you're breathing?

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    14. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by ronfar · · Score: 1
      I just want to point out that the first computer I ever owned (well, technically my parents owned it but it ended up as mine when my Dad bought a second one), the Atari 800, used a TV as a monitor. It was a real computer, it had the BASIC and PILOT programming languages, we eventually got a floppy drive to go along with a tape drive, and a modem to log on to Compuserve and local BBSs. Oh, and a printer for using the cartridge based(!) word processor (in those days, cut & paste was the big new thing in UI design.)


      How did I solve the problem you mention? Simple, the Atari computer had a dedicated TV for it's monitor. It was a small one, but it meant that if I wanted to play M. U. L. E. or type in a program from Compute! magazine, I didn't need to quit when someone else was watching TV. (Also all the hardware fit on a desk. Of course, in those days I don't think they had mice, my pointing device was an Atari joystick.)


      Heck, right now I have my Sega Dreamcast hooked up, along with a keyboard and a mouse to a VGA monitor on a desk in my office using the VGA box (with a boom box for sound). Since it doesn't have any serious rewritable storage it isn't useful for much beyond game playing and Web surfing (unfortunately it seems that interest in porting Linux or BSD to it has waned somewhat). However, it could be made into a computer so easily...


      Still, since there is a VGA box available for XBox (though I think it is 3rd party and not MS endorsed), you could do the same thing.

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    15. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if that means seeing an add like "Dude, er. I mean, Mike, Yer bankrupt! Go D'hELL"

      or Gateway having a cow...

      I'm all for it!.

    16. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by stubear · · Score: 2

      How the hell did this moron get +5, Interesting? Microsoft makes theirmoney on CORPORATE accounts. The xbox is not a threat in teh business world as most companies don't put game machines in the cubicles for their workers.

    17. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by tb3 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that what they've wanted for the last twenty years?

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    18. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ha ha. Those of use old enough to remember these things will know that just over 20 years ago, MS really were a hardware company.

      Over 20 years ago MS was a computer languages and operating systems company.

      Their language products were: Basic (of course), Assembly, Cobol, Pascal and Fortran. The Operating Systems were Microsoft Xenix (later sold to SCO) and DEC Stand-Alone Basic (where FAT originated). They also had MultiPlan for CP/M and Xenix.

      > Their biggest seller back then was an expansion board for the Apple II that allowed users to run z80 (CP/M type stuff) on that machine.

      Microsoft Softcard ran actual CP/M. They were a DRI OEM customer and wrote their own BIOS in co-operation with SCP and that is how they knew about QDOS.

      The Softcard was not a major revenue earner for MS in itself, but it allowed MS to sell langauge software to Apple II users. MS were not 'really a hardware company', there was just one product amongst their wide range of software.

      > Then some d0rk from IBM came along and offered them a software contract... and you know the rest.

      IBM had already contracted for MS Basic (for the ROM) and for IBM PC versions of Pascal, Fortran and Cobol when Gates offered SCP's QDOS as a 'version' of CP/M.

    19. Re:Alarm bells going off at Dell and Gateway by Bytenik · · Score: 1

      My first was the Atari 600XL, then the 800XL, then Indus GT disk drive. I remember typing in Compute listings too. Good times!

      Regarding the TV issue though. I don't think that having your own TV solved the problem. By having your own TV, you didn't have the problem to begin with. It sounds like your Atari wasn't in the living room.

      I also had a little TV in my room for my Atari. The TV was just the "monitor" of the times.

      Plus, the Atari was actually intended to be used as a computer (limited though they were back then).

      I also had an Intellivision in the living room. You can bet your ass though that when my Dad wanted to watch the news I had to quit playing.

      Anyway, I just don't see a device with a mouse and keyboard being used in the living room. It's too awkward.

      --

      "Scientists prove we were never here."
      -- Devo

  34. still waiting by cdf12345 · · Score: 1

    There's going to have to be better software to even get me to consider the Xbox.

    Jet Set Radio future is the only thing I can thing of that makes the ShitBox worth buying.

    Personally I'd rather play the original on my dreamcast and run a little Xmame if I get bored.

    --
    Chicago2600.net more than a lifestyle, its a survival trait.
    1. Re:still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xbox will have its own MAME in a matter of weeks and maybe days. It's very close.

      As far as unfree software for the xbox - for being 6 months old it has some of the best software of any console released. Halo, JSRF, and Rallisport are all perfect games exclusive to the xbox. It does lack a RPG though, but so does the Gamecube.

  35. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    2 extra games are worthless?
    Why did you buy a console then?

  36. And in continuing replying to myself... by Xenex · · Score: 2

    Microsoft are going to give $250 of Xbox "products" as a "gift" to early adopters. How nice of them.

    I wonder if "products" are going to be full games/controls/accessories...

    1. Re:And in continuing replying to myself... by Felius · · Score: 1

      Read the article..

      They're giving people who've already bought an x-box two games and a controller.

      For people in Aus, the deal is online here:
      http://www.xbox.com/au/support/OnlineFreebie.htm

      --
      ..and I'll form the head!!
    2. Re:And in continuing replying to myself... by misfit13b · · Score: 1

      Nah, they're gonna be t-shirts with "ASSIMILATED" written on 'em. ;^)

  37. MICROSOFT LOVES US!!! by tcmardoc · · Score: 1

    NOT!

    --
    -JAPAN: ol yor beys ar bilong tu as! -AH!
  38. Grammatical correctness by ChazeFroy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Reading the two links from slashdot, I couldn't help but notice the poor journalism and grammatical errors committed by the authors of the aformentioned articles. Identically, this has occurred multiple times on cnn.com's international correspondence pages, especially when reporting the violence in the Middle East. Is this where all of our beloved undergraduate English majors surface?

    I have 50 karma, so I could give two shits and a fuck if you moderate me down. I'm just noticing poor grammar everywhere, so screw you.

    1. Re:Grammatical correctness by LuckyPhil · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Is this where all of our beloved undergraduate English majors surface?

      Shouldn't that read:
      - Is this where our entire beloved undergraduate English majors surface?

      Yea, I've noticed poor grammar everywhere too! :)

    2. Re:Grammatical correctness by os2fan · · Score: 2
      [This is OT, but replies to issues raised in the parent].

      I am not an English Major. I did poorly in it at school. Still, I have made a concious effort to improve my English since leaving school.

      English majors, as a class, are not writers. Just as in programming, "writing good language", and "writing things that people will get excited about" are quite different properties.

      Poor journalism is more to do with corporate image. The ABC and the BBC put a lot of effort into grooming their on-line people.

      I have 50 karma as well. But then, I care about this.

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    3. Re:Grammatical correctness by Captain+Pedantic · · Score: 0

      It would only be that if "beloved undergraduate English majors" was singular.

      You could, and perhaps should, say

      - Is this where our entire supply of beloved undergraduate English majors surface?

      --

      None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.
  39. Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No way. They make money off the consoles because third-parties write the code (no cost to them) and they get royalties (money makes up for what they lost on the hardware). I spent $300 on a PS2 and another $600 on games; that's the pattern in the console market. If they made the hardware *and* the software then there's no way they could afford to pull off the same thing long term. If they controlled both and boosted the prices across both hardware & software divisions then they'd piss too many people off and another company would jump in and smack them to the ground (it happens).

    1. Re:Wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right. The original argument sounds good if you have no knowledge of the history of MS. The software was what made them the gatekeeper. On the other hand you had Apple, where their demand to own the whole road was ultimately its downfall.

      Microsoft doesn't want anything to do with the hardware more then they have to. They want the OS - the gate - every processor needs. It just so happens that a game/set top box's software forces them to get into the hardware market. Windows, WinCE, XBox, WinToaster, etc - if it's an OS, MS will be there.

  40. Make a Linux computer out of it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what is required for running Linux on it? Is it possible at all?

  41. And? by Lurgen · · Score: 1

    Price drops won't save this product in Australia... the biggest customer-base for this sort of product consists of geeks - many of which are currently out of work, job-threatened, or just plain too damn busy to play games right now.

    Kids (in Australia at least) don't tend to buy console systems in the XBox's price bracket. Even the PS2 didn't really kick off until it had a huge range of games available to it.

    Is it just me, or did Microsoft screw up by not releasing enough games for this platform?

    1. Re:And? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that you are talking out of your ass.
      The biggest customer-base consists of geeks ... gee,what a piece of bullshit.

  42. What everyone is REALLY waitting for. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll buy one as soon as they crack it.

  43. I'm trying to help out America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in WA and I haven't bought an XBox. I haven't even tried one out at Best Buy. If enough of us completely ignore the XBox then we should see the price drops too. This is a call to arms!

    1. Re:I'm trying to help out America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WA? you live in a Wide Anus?

  44. The relative cost of gaming.. by Nazghal · · Score: 2, Informative

    This price drop has brought up something that always made me curious as an aussie gamer. The hypothetical "what if" is about to be answered..

    The problem for the average aussie gamer, is that titles/consoles that are sold here are basically sold in USD prices, converted to local currency.. i.e. That $40US game will be released here at ~$80AUD. However, the average aussie wage is the same (or less) in AUD than an equivalent job in USD..

    So the aussie gamer is effectively paying "twice" as much for games with his hard earnt cash..

    i.e. Two kids working at mcdonalds say, are bringing home their $8/hr local currency for 20 hour week.

    The US kid, $160 USD buys them 4 games. The Aussie kid, $160 AUD buys them 2 games.

    Of course the best solution for the aussie gamer would be if they sold the title for an equivalent local amount.. But if that was the case, then wouldnt everyone overseas just turn around and import/mail order stuff from these countries where the local dollar was weak. You'll already see people pondering about doing this exact thing in the comments.

    Will this establish a driver for more "affordable" gaming prices in Australia, or will it just provoke a massive mail order business by US folks looking to score their gaming at cheap rates..

    I'll be looking on with interest

    1. Re:The relative cost of gaming.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      or will it just provoke a massive mail order business by US folks looking to score their gaming at cheap rates..

      When in Australia last year, I bought a Cricket PS1 game to take back with me to the US. It didnt run on a US Playstation. Which I think is stupid, I was willing to pay for it to play it, why stop me.

      macom

    2. Re:The relative cost of gaming.. by xamel · · Score: 0

      Yah, but you're forgetting that American kids don't make $8 an hour working at McDonalds; we're getting min. wage, $6 an hour if we're REALLY lucky...

      --
      GOD DAMNIT , MODERATE ME!
    3. Re:The relative cost of gaming.. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage is a good deal lower in the US, I'd imagine. And tips at McDonalds' can't be all that great :/

      Also, the fact that all the wages are so high in the US means that cost of living is higher too. Swings & roundabouts.

      (Of course I'm Australian too, so I wouldn't really know :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    4. Re:The relative cost of gaming.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xbox games are not 40USD, more like 50USD. and that is here.

  45. All or nothing? Probably the latter by Darth+Paul · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has a long history of ditching projects that don't take off the way they hoped (Hailstorm anybody?). The question now if, will XBox go the same way?

    Here in Australia, XBox is basically dead, I don't think the price cut will overcome the fundamental problem of the miniscule software library. I imagine the same situation in Europe if they're having the price cut too, and it's flopped in Japan too, where the games just aren't suited to local tastes.

    It's only in North America where XBox has been even moderately successful (if that!). Is it worth Microsoft's trouble to keep the XBox alive? The raft of in-house game developers? The super-subsidized hardware? It will also be harder to keep those game developers, who are going to see tiny xbox audiences and be sorely tempted, contracts or no, to go back to developing PS2/GC/PC titles.

    Sure MS can absorb the hit, even a substantial one like this, if there's any chance of Xbox3 or Xbox4 being successful (My take: probably), but Microsoft seems to be focussing on the short-term lately, and I don't think MS has the patience at this stage to stay the distance.

    That said, Xbox has only been here in australia for barely 2 months, making it one of the most spectacular flops I've ever seen. The image of an 800 pound gorilla bellyflopping off a 1-metre high diving board comes to mind :)

  46. New M$ strategy by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft will start shipping xbox's with every copy of Windoze sold and claim that it is an integral part of the operating system and that it is to the users benefit to have xbox functionality be a part of the OS. A bunch of states will whine about it, but when push comes to shove, they'll "force" M$ to donate 1 million xbox's to schools ensuring a bountiful supply of users in need of software (which actually does show a nice profit).

    Also, M$ will announce that the next version of xbox will use their new operating system called Unix# (that's Unix Sharp, not Unix Pound, or Unix Waffle, or Unix Tic-Tac-Toe, or Unix Number). Unix# will be just like Unix, but much better for end users and developers as it will make their lives much easier. Differences include forcing all shared libraries to have the .dll extension, changing the path seperator to the backslash, and creating home, professional, server, advanced server, way super duper advanced server, and ludicrous speed server versions of the OS (though through some packaging magic, all versions of the OS will ship on a single cd).

    In the meantime, Bill Gates, who is personally funding xbox from his personal "play" account, is forced, due to weak sales, to postpone the purchase of the country of Belize until the next fiscal quarter.

  47. Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by rbeattie · · Score: 2, Interesting


    The price drops in the UK and Europe are the most important... there's like 300 million people here and like what, 5 in Australia?

    This announcement comes only a few days after news reports came out saying it was obvious that Microsoft wasn't going to make their sales targets. I don't know WHAT the hell they were thinking at first putting the price up so high in Europe, the economies here are much, much weaker than in the U.S. Almost no one can afford 450 for freakin' game machine.

    There was no real reason for the prices to be that high, especially since they're making the XBox's in Hungary, not a place known for its high labor costs, hey?

    I read that Microsoft wasn't probably going to lower prices in the U.S. until Sony does, but it seems that Microsoft is looking at the numbers and not the competition (at least in the rest of the world) so maybe they'll get a clue.

    Has anyone hacked this bad boy with Linux yet? Then to me it would be worth the price of letting a Microsoft product into my home.

    -Russ

    --
    Me
    1. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by danny · · Score: 4, Informative
      20 million in Australia, so yes, it's less significant than Europe (even though Australians probably buy more of this kind of thing per capita).

      Danny.

      --
      I have written over 900 book reviews
    2. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are more than 5 million people in australia thanks very much......If absolute population meant anything in terms of newsworthyness then we'd hear a great deal more about China and India.

    3. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by jason_hutchens · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the sort of blinkered attitude that prompts news sources to feed local news to the populace, bugger the rest of the world. The result is a total lack of knowledge about anything outside of your own backyard (like, for example, the rough population of a country on the other side of the world).

      - Jason Hutchens.

    4. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The price drops in the UK and Europe are the most important... there's like 300 million people here and like what, 5 in Australia?
      Try nearly 19 million.
    5. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by rbeattie · · Score: 1

      That's three so far... How many more over-sensitive Australians are going to get their panties in a bunch because I didn't give the exact population of their cuntry? I don't know whether to appologize or to point out that I was being, like, facetious.

      One guy even called me a "pom." What the hell is a pom? Do they even speak English in Australia? (I'm joking... Christ. Have another Fosters and get over it.)

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    6. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'pom' comes from P.O.M.E. - Prisoner Of Mother England

    7. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I'm joking... Christ. Have another Fosters and get over it.)

      Australians don't drink Fosters. We export it to the rest of the world, and drink the proper stuff like VB and Carlton Draught.

    8. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      How many more over-sensitive Australians are going to get their panties in a bunch because I didn't give the exact population of their cuntry?
      "5" is a little bit off the mark, you know.

      As an Australian I'll reciprocate - let me have a guess for the UK population ... erm...(picks random figure) 50 million? Ish? Personally I wonder how the hell you manage to fit everybody into the place - no wonder you all smell (ducks for cover).

      And as for X-Boxes? They were retailing for $629 in local outlets in .au. My last PC box for work (1.1GHz celeron / 256MB / 20G) cost me $739.

      To turn that into another universal indicator, $629 will buy you 600 cans of beer in Australia. Most Australians are just not that keen on yet another game console. I think they'll have trouble at half the price - and with games being $80 - $100 a pop (er, 76 - 98 cans of beer) they'd have better luck getting blood out of a stone.

      (And , beer jokes aside, is it really worth it? Graphics are nice , but the gameplay? I dunno.)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    9. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by rbeattie · · Score: 1


      Nice try, I'm an American living in Spain. So I'm with you, the English do smell, but you should try Southern Europe... A hot day, the Metro in Madrid and it's gas mask time.

      US: 280 million, Spain: duhhh... 40? Not really sure... God, now THAT is sad. Okay, I just looked it up, I was right (whew! no editing, really), but the UK has like 60 million. California has about 34 million. Canada has..., ahh, who the hell cares about them? They cheat in Hockey.

      This is so ridiculously off topic it's scary.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    10. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taking in account the playability and re-playability of the latest game titles in the market (in any platform)...

      I doubt seriously that it is worth the effort!

      Cheers.

    11. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by GregWebb · · Score: 1

      No, POHM - Prisoner of His / Her (delete as then applicable, can't remember when we did Transportation) Majesty.

      --

      Greg

      (Inside a nuclear plant)
      Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    12. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by toofast · · Score: 2

      Cadada: 32 million.

      We don't cheat in hockey. We simply invent the rules =)

    13. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1

      As an Australian I'll reciprocate - let me have a guess for the UK population ... erm...(picks random figure) 50 million? Ish?

      For a random figure, that's pretty good - we're about 60 million.

      Personally I wonder how the hell you manage to fit everybody into the place - no wonder you all smell (ducks for cover).

      It's no use hiding. We caught (insert however many greats here) grandad (or granny) for something and transported 'em to Oz, and we'll get you too :-)

    14. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody in Europe can afford to spend &450 yet they consistently claim to have higher standard of living than people living in US.
      Interesting ...

    15. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Carlton Draught? you are obviously a southerner, probably from the city where it's flat and the streets meet at right angles (and you turn right from the left hand of the street). Everybody else drinks New.

    16. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      On 20 April 2002 at 02:05:33 (Canberra time), the resident population of Australia is projected to be:

      19,551,839

      (gotta love the ABS :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    17. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Claim: "Pommy" (or "pom"), a slang term for a British person, comes from the acronym POHM, which was used to designate a "Prisoner of His Majesty."

      Status: FALSE.

      Origins: "Pommy" (or "pom" or "pommie") is a primarily Australian (and largely derisive) slang term used to indicate a recent immigrant from Great Britain, or a Brit in general. The origins of "pommy" having been lost in the mists of time, someone needed to cook up an etymology for it, preferably one equal to the pejorative sense of the word. Accordingly, we now have the story that criminals transported to Australia were designated "Prisoners of His Majesty" or "Prisoners of Mother England" (some versions claim the convicts bore one of these legends printed on the backs of their shirts), and thus the acronym "POHM" or "POME" eventually evolved into the slang term "pom" or "pommy."

      This amusing anecdote is doubtful as anything more than a fanciful invention, as acronymic origins antedating the mid-twentieth century are automatically suspect, and the use of "pommy" has been recorded at least as far back as 1915. Moreover, nobody has yet turned up corroborating evidence that "Prisoner of His Majesty" or "Prisoners of Mother England" were actually common designations for criminals transported to Australia. The best guess at this time is that "pommy" was based on the word "pomegranate" -- either because the redness of the fruit supposedly matched the typically florid British complexion, or because (like "Johnny Grant") it was used as rhyming slang for "immigrant."

    18. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that you consider each Australian to be worth 50x what each American is worth?

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    19. Re:Europes the news... This headline's backwards. by rbeattie · · Score: 1


      YOU STUPID FUCKING ANONYMOUS ASSHOLE.

      American consumerism does NOT equal having a higher standard of living. With 20% of American children under the poverty line, average working weeks above 50 hours and vacations less than than 2 weeks a year, millions of working poor (you work hard but you still can't pay your bills), no national health care and a governmental/economic system where winner takes all and leaves nothing for the rest, the American standard for living DOES NOT COMPARE to the standard of living elsewhere. YOU STUPID CLOSE MINDED FUCK.

      Get your head out of your goddamn ass. Being able to buy an XBox does not mean the American way of life is the best. Idiot.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
  48. What about NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Price drops in Australia? Across a small strech of ocean is New Zealand. There are precisely zero places where you can buy an xbox or xbox games. I can't think of a reason why they sell them in Australia, but not across the ditch. Too small? Not to small for Playstation 2. Ps2 is the winner by default.

    1. Re:What about NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That "ditch" is about half as wide as europe.

  49. A Modest Proposal by KillerKane · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was already losing money on the gizmo at the original price. They accepted this as the price for breaking into a new -- and potentially -- very lucrative market. At the Australian price, they are taking a sitz bath in hydrochloric acid.

    Somebody, please, find a friend in Australia, have them buy the units at AUS prices, set up an ad-hoc dealership here, advertise, to make sure everyone knows they can have the unit for almost half-off, and drain those bastards on margin till they fscking bleeding die.

    I will donate time to whoever does this. Let their own greed kill them. Then we can all install *nix on the little xboxen, and reslant Netcraft stats.

    Just a drunken daydream from a CG veteran...

    --
    There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
    1. Re:A Modest Proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, Microsoft has $40 billion US dollars in the bank. Yes, that's $40,000,000,000. A few hundred million can't hurt them.

      The freekin sales of their office suite cover the entire R&D budget for the Xbox.

  50. What next, 5,000 yen? by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 5, Informative
    If they're willing to go that low in Australia, I wonder what they have in store for Japan, where they have yet to institute a preice drop and where the XBox is being outsold by the PS1!

    Week 4/8-4/14, Japan Hardware Sales

    * PS2: 55,000 units (total this year: 1,323,000)
    * GBA: 31,000 units (total this year: 969,000)
    * GameCube: 10,000 units (total this year: 510,000)
    * PS1: 3,000 units (total this year: 74,000)
    * WonderSwan: 2,000 units (total this year: 11,330)
    * Xbox: 1,800 units (total this year: 169,000)
    * Dreamcast: 1,500 units (total this year: 12,000)

    (from IGN)

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
    1. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by demonbug · · Score: 1
      If they're willing to go that low in Australia, I wonder what they have in store for Japan, where they have yet to institute a preice drop and where the XBox is being outsold by the PS1!


      I don't think the problem in Japan is really the price, the Japanese have a history (well, for the last 15 or 20 years anyway) of paying big bucks for these toys. I think for them it is more an issue of national pride (why buy an American game console when you can buy a Japanese one). Also, I don't think MS has done well in releasing games that appeal to that particular market (or to any other market, for that matter. My friend got an x-box a while ago, and the only game he has found for it that he likes is Halo, which MS stole from Mac/PC (the bastards)).

    2. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice the Gamecube was released in Japan over Christmas - and has about 3 times what the xbox has overall, when the xbox was released last month. Then they sold 10k units, compared with 55k for the PS2. Is that not bombing too?

      Who didn't think the xbox would struggle there though. The Japanese are isolationists, even racist, when it comes to foreign products. It'll be a while before MS cracks that market.

    3. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by BlameFate · · Score: 1

      Go WonderSwan !! I want me one of them; whatever it is; it sounds fabulous!

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    4. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not the national pride. it's the games.

      xbox just doesn't have any good games (if you ask
      me or the japanese people).

    5. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by Ahchay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just as a bit of information...

      The wonderswan is a rather lovely little handheld device - similar in size to a GBA. I've got two of them...

      In hardware terms it supports one or two rather unique features. The display is full colour and comes with a brightness control which helps in extreme lighting conditions - still no backlight though. It's also got any number of rather unique peripherals (most of which are only usable in Japan) such as the Wondergate for multiplayer gaming via a mobile phone and a link up cable for the PS/2. Cream of the crop though is the mighty wonderborg" which *everyone* should play with!

      There are some good games available, although for the western gamer it's a slightly mixed bag - like many JPN only consoles it's heavily dominated by Japanese language RPG's (including rocking versions of Final Fantasy I & II) and a few survival horror things. Namco have got a few of their arcade conversions available as well (Mr. Driller, Final Lap) as do Sammy (Guilty Gear) and capcom (Makimaura - Ghosts and Goblins to you and me).

      Ebay is always a good place to buy, several hong kong based distributors sell consoles and games. You can also buy at Lik Sang

      Anyway, probably more information than you really wanted... And yes, it is a much more exciting machine than the bloody xbox.

      Cheers
      Chris

    6. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by BlameFate · · Score: 1

      Thanks! It sounds great; I'm off to Lik Sang do do some snooping :-)

      --

      --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

    7. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by Asprin · · Score: 1
      Cream of the crop though is the mighty wonderborg" [channel.or.jp] which *everyone* should play with!


      Ahhh, a miniature BIG TRAK! See - Japan can't do *anything* original!!! &lt wink &gt

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    8. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      My friend got an x-box a while ago, and the only game he has found for it that he likes is Halo, which MS stole from Mac/PC (the bastards)).

      If you really wanted Halo, wait for the PC/Mac release which should happen some time this year. And as you can imagine, it will be somewhat more expandable than the console version - Bungie are not the sort of company to waste the extra complexity available on a PC.

      I just hope it runs in WINE, because my guess is the chances of a Linux port are low to zero.

      Cheers,

      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    9. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by heideggier · · Score: 1
      I don't think the problem in Japan is really the price, the Japanese have a history (well, for the last 15 or 20 years anyway) of paying big bucks for these toys. I think for them it is more an issue of national pride (why buy an American game console when you can buy a Japanese one).

      I dunno about that one, a mate of mine recently went to japan and brought back some fashion magazines, pretty cool, the spine is on the left hand side rather then on the right, the things are filled with cartoons, there are ads for weight loss and hair removal products for men (I mean for dudes dude) etc etc.

      The one thing I noticed is that there are ads for star wars figures, even ads trying to sell motor bikes have rows of star wars figures in the back ground, just cause they were trying to be cool (imagine that in a western mag). Anyway, my point is that, if national pride was such a big issue in japan then things like star wars would not sell because it is American

      I think that the problem in japan is that there is no national pride, that people like to see themselves as belonging to a group or a company and not to a nation, like Americans do. I think that if you gave guns to all the employees of sony and nintendo then there is no doubt that they wouldn't go at it. That there is serious fanboy pride in that country to put the rest of us to shame. Perhaps M$ should try to install itself as being a "group" (a better word would be scean) in japan the same way these companies do, trying to create a fanbase, then they would have a greater chance of selling their product. After all, things like pokomon did come from that country, Manga shows tend to have fan service etc etc

      Ofcourse if there is anyone from japan posting, could they please follow up, since I am just another ignorate westerner. Better to here it out of the horses mouth

      --
      Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
    10. Re:What next, 5,000 yen? by demonbug · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying the Japanese only buy Japanese products, I was saying that given a choice, they probably prefer to spend their money on a Japanese product over a foreign one. Just like many Americans, given the choice, choose American goods. After all, look at all those people buying American cars when they could be buying Japanese, or better yet, German cars. My point was that I don't think the Xbox being a lttle more or less expensive than the PS2 is going to make much of a difference in that market.

  51. it does by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    What the reviewer meant is that at those prices the Xbox could be used as a really cheap computer (or maybe even a webserver). for those uses OS matters.

  52. Linux is a great games OS! by patdoody · · Score: 1

    "With a fast CPU, wizzy graphics card, ethernet, DVD and TV out, it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS." what use would all that hardware be if it ran linux? you wouldn't be able to play any games on it.. then again with that fast CPU I guess you could compile your windows emulation programs faster.

  53. This should kill US sales... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...until they drop the price here as well. Think about it: let's say they don't immediately drop the price in the US. Anyone who actually reads the news (and can restrain their consumeristic but-I-really-want-it-now! impulses) is going to hold off on buying one because they're going to wait for a corresponding US price drop.

    *Especially* if they're thinking "Gee, X-Box don't seem to be selling too well right now...maybe I should wait it out a bit to make sure this ain't the next Dreamcast"

  54. just wait for the MSN rebates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    free XBOX if you sign up for 5 years of MSN.... *shudder*.

    -Happy with my Dreamcast, blind-dialable modem with ppp, and BBA.

  55. you know what... hardware & software same comp by tcmardoc · · Score: 1

    sounds good.. though we know microsoft is an evil company... still, remember the Amiga? remember the MAC? those are pretty expensive computers. but they both manufacture the hardware and design the software what makes it a better computer. sounds kinda dumb to say that.. but hey.. i looooove amiga!

    --
    -JAPAN: ol yor beys ar bilong tu as! -AH!
  56. Re:Real OS? by kpetruse · · Score: 1

    As far as I recall, the XBox runs a cut down version of XP, which is of the NT family. In other words, it's not based on DOS. Although NT has a DOS emulator (NTVDM & wowexec), it's not exactly perfect.

    And anyway, why is everyone bitching about this? Microsoft are out there to make money, and they know that they have to sell Xbox's at a loss in order to make a larger profit on software licencing. This is the console business. I don't see anyone on /. moaning about Sony or Nintendo doing exactly the same. How many times has the PS2 had its price cut? Will there be such a fuss when Nintendo cut the price on the GameCube?

    Plus, for all the people who are talking about Linux being "a proper OS" - how many games are available on it? I dislike Windows OS's for many things, but for games support, and general ease of use for the less, ahem, able members of the computer using population, Windows fits the bill (pun not intended). All these "My OS is better than yours" arguments sound rather like the old "My Amiga is better than your Atari ST" and the classic "My C64 is better than your Spectrum".

    For the record, my Spectrum was better than your C64. Now that's started a flame war (at least, for all the British posters to /.)...

  57. sell at loss? Nay, Listen Ye to the Almight Gord by PsychoElf · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, Sony does not sell at a loss. Nintendo, Sega, and Microsoft, however, do sell at a loss. Read the prophetic words of the Almighty Gord. http://www.actsofgord.com/Proclamations/chapter02. html

  58. Linux for X-Box by SteelLynx · · Score: 1
    Well, they can't pay for their serverhosting and it doesn't look like they've got Linux running yet.
    But they are working on it - and that's cool :-)

    xbox-linux.org
    Alternate url (to the same site, though).

    /Steel Lynx
    --

    --
    It's 19:11:42. Do You Know Where Your Meat Body Is?
    1. Re:Linux for X-Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, according to their website they're sorta out of business these days.

      Nice idea, though.

  59. Ditto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh, if I can't "backup" my games what good is it?

    Its like an ethical issue or something..

  60. M.A.M.E. port by Superkind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyway, M.A.M.E. is in the progress of being ported.

    --
    (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
    1. Re:M.A.M.E. port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read that web site you'll see that it is pretty old. He got it running on the dev kit MS provides. MAME for the XBOX is coming soon from another source though.

    2. Re:M.A.M.E. port by stevey · · Score: 1

      Its a shame that when its finished the author will be unable to legally distribute it.

      (Only registered XBox developers can recieve it; and other users couldn't use it if they got it).

  61. All stand please.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australians all let us rejoice for we are young and free......

    And no one gives a toss about the XBox here..

    Bring back God save the Queen.

  62. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should have waited for the GameCube dude...

  63. Console price not deciding factor by PsyQ · · Score: 1

    Who cares if the console gets cheaper? Even if I had an Xbox for free, the games are still ridiculously expensive, at least in Switzerland. PS2 games are CHF 89.-, some Xbox games (Halo) up to CHF 129.-! That's 30% more (into MS' pockets I guess), for games that don't look better and play worse than things available for the PS2 at the moment.

    Heck, the PS2 games are expensive already, I'm glad PC games haven't caught up with them yet - except for Dungeon Siege, which ist the most expensive PC game I have ever seen, CHF 119.- instead of the usual CHF 79.- for PC games. It's an MS title that will also be availablr on the Xbox for a slightly higher price -- just a coincidence? *Twilight Zone music playing*

  64. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    Why did he buy one if he hated it?

  65. No big deal. by banky · · Score: 2

    They have sufficient cash in the bank to practically give them away. Reports indicated that they expected to lose, what, a billion or something in the first year?

    All it's gonna take is a couple really GOOD games, not Halo-good, but 'Legend Of Zelda' good. If they can hit that sweet spot, things will change.

    The hardware is certainly there, as if the software/OS. What I think is holding them back is that developing for a PC takes a slightly different mindset. I doubt some companies already heavily invested in Playstation gaming want to move over to XBox. Given the length of release cycles in PC games, I doubt the big PC game makers (Blizzard, etc) can even reasonably expect to get the game out. Besides, most PC companies don't have the mindset, either; they seem to sell lately on the idea of multiplayer, and expansions. The console market seems small, I would suspect.

    Dunno. What's it take to develop on the XBox? Can I just pick up a copy of Visual Studio .NET and check "build XBOX exe"?

    --
    ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
    1. Re:No big deal. by Ji-Owon · · Score: 1

      I agree about hitting the sweet spot. I think Unreal Championship and perhaps Morrowind (even tho this will be a pc game as well) will be the stuff. Soul Caliber 2, if done better on the Xbox, may be another "sweet spot" game altho Soul Caliber wasn't enough to pull the DreamCast out of the toilet. Sega just didn't have the funds (which some went to Microsoft).
      I think MS will definately be able to stick it out for 2002, 2003 will be the decider. These sweet spot games should be out by end of 2002.

      --
      ....tis just the beginning
    2. Re:No big deal. by SirPerc · · Score: 1, Informative

      What it takes to develop on an XBox? Mwah ha ha,

      You need
      MS Visual C++,
      XBox Full Development Kit (Includes cusom XBox that can play burnt CD's)
      Signing your life away to a Micorosft Developmnet License.

      Microsoft are doing the same thing as Nintendo do, they are only allowing self published games, no game can be published by someone who hasn't signed up to the development agreements.

      Incidently you can get a Software developmnet kit, which allows you to run a XBox emulator on your PC basically, and test your games without having to burn them onto CD and crash the nice XBox.

    3. Re:No big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK - I'll bite and provide an answer to that one from someone who actually develops on an xbox.

      MS sell you an xbox development kit, which includes *everything* you need for xbox development with the exception of a PC. This includes OS (W2K) and compiler (VC).

      The devkit itself is slightly taller than a retail xbox and is encased in translucent white plastic. It plugs into the network, and to run games on it you copy them onto the xbox's hard drive to run them. No messing around with burning CDs or any of that rubbish.

      Microsoft provide what have to be the best tools I've ever seen for console development - GUI tools on the PC side for those who like that sort of thing, and command line tools for the rest of us, a debugger that actually works (better than PC remote debugging too).

      Don't even get me started on how flakey and unsupported the PS2 tools are in comparison!

      Working on the XBox has totally changed my opinion of Microsoft. They can get things right when they want to and perceive that as the way to get what they're after, and in the case of the xbox they're going after developer support and making all the right moves to get it.

      I really cannot believe that anyone who has worked on any of the major consoles would ever want to work on anything other than an xbox in an ideal world. (In the real world you work on what you're paid to work on)

    4. Re:No big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what sweet spot games for xbox? can you name any? even one?

    5. Re:No big deal. by blank · · Score: 1

      no, no. what MS needs are sweet original games for the xbox. they have sweet games now but many of them did not come out for the xbox first. SSX tricky is a sweet game but everyone already played it on the PS2. Metal Gear Solid 2 is a sweet game but all the hype and anticipation was already done on the PS2. even Final Fantasy X (if really ported to XBOX) had already had the hype. MS just gets sloppy seconds so this doesn't give it any credibility and worst yet what it does get primary are PC games! so it looks like a PC, smells like a PC.

      --

      bah. start over

    6. Re:No big deal. by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >I agree about hitting the sweet spot. I think Unreal Championship and
      >perhaps Morrowind (even tho this will be a pc game as well) will be
      >the stuff.
      >
      More PC gamer BS. You idiots just don't understand the Console game market. Games designed with a PC gamer's mindset in mind just will not fly with Console gamers. You will find very,very few Console gamers running out and buying a Xbox because Unreal Championship is out for it basically because most Console gamers *DON'T LIKE* games like Unreal Championship. We don't play them on the PC and we sure as hell aren't running out and buying them for our consoles.

    7. Re:No big deal. by kubrick · · Score: 1

      They have sufficient cash in the bank to practically give them away. Reports indicated that they expected to lose, what, a billion or something in the first year?

      Not that I disagree, but any money put towards price cuts means less marketing budget (assuming they don't keep topping that up separately, of course :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  66. Spam faxes by child_of_mercy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've had two spam faxes in the office today (we never get spam faxes here, so thats significant in itself)

    The gist of them is that if I sign up for an MSCE course I'll get a free X-Box

    It shows every sign of a truly desperate company trying to shift stock, and certainly makes it look like the X-Box is a tacky trinket.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:Spam faxes by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
      Well, it is. The thing to remember for geeks is this:

      Geeks are ingenious. Geeks like, no, love saying things like, "It was really intended as a game console but a couple days of work, a new HD, some fiddly changes on the motherboard and it's a Linux box with super nVidia 3d acceleration!" Geeks might enjoy that even more than a proper Linux box.

      However, the geek view on these things sometimes also includes the notion, "...and MS lose money on every one sold so you should make lots of these modded consoles!" Unfortunately, those who would like to see MS lose lots of money should consider this fact:

      MS lose lots MORE money when the things sit on shelves like they were glued there- and this is happening.

      The XBox is dying. All we need now is for MS to just TRY to stir up attention for XBox 2 and the XBox will _be_ an expensive failure for them.

      Don't fsck that up by actually buying any of the things.

    2. Re:Spam faxes by HojoTheRetard · · Score: 1

      Read the Fax closely and you will realize that the fax isn't from MS but rather from an MSCE(.Y.) training school.

    3. Re:Spam faxes by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

      and that the training providers have stock for this purpose? and are sending out the spam at the same time as the price cuts are announced?

      doesn't seem like a coincidence to me

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  67. Unfocused by moankey · · Score: 1

    Microsoft continually loses focus and gets into financial embarrasments. Didnt they learn from Microsoft cordless phones, car stereos, MSN, remote controls, speakers, etc...
    They need to just stick to their core money makers, Office and a mediocre OS that costs consumers every year or 2.
    Telcos should be a sign that Monopoly doesnt necessarily mean you cannabilize yourself.

  68. XBOX Cracked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  69. console, but what about the games? by vic20beta · · Score: 1

    They need to make the games cheaper. What games are cheaper the ps2 or the xbox, or the nintendo one when it comes out in europe? disclaimer: I don't have a console

    1. Re:console, but what about the games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dreamcast, broadband, and some friends with accounts on good sites is what you need for cheap games. PS2 piracy is getting easier, but Dreamcast piracy is easy as hell (if only there was a way to easily rip a real copy to a copyable copy without special equipment and such).

      Fuck the cost of console games. I didn't buy a Dreamcast until the piracy scene was nicely developed.

  70. What don't u people get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that is a really great market cornering strategy. Highly risky but M$ has always done the 'BEST' job when it comes to marketing (in comparison with other companies out there).
    It's hilarious to read all the complaints about M$ regarding this. Give it a rest you all sound like broken records.
    You wonder why M$ can corner the market with much that they sell, even though it always sucks? It's cause the other companies don't know how to market their products the same way.
    Quit bitching about M$, and start complaining how the god damn PS2 hasn't come down in price much at all.
    If it did I would buy one for sure, but seeing as xbox is gonna drop in price, thats what I am getting.
    They get a sale, I get a game console. Don't see nothing wrong with that.
    I think maybe /. ers should do a little bit more complaining about other companies...you know, the companies that make it too easy for M$.

  71. Re:Once again, Slashdot editors are slow to post. by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

    I think you will find it was the US that invaded the USSR, and it is spelt scarred, not scared as in frightened, and C is renowned amongst those researching better programming languages as being no better than a universal assembly language. And the NRA is a bunch of paranoid losers used by the Gun manufacturers to justify making money out of devices to kill people.

    --

    Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

  72. It figures by Diabolical · · Score: 2

    Microsoft couldn't do anything else.. it has to fight it's way up to Sony which is number 1 overall. People who own PS1 consoles now will probably not buy the Xbox just because their current games aren't compatible with it. If they buy the PS2 they have a new gaming console, new games AND they can still use their old games without having their old console.

    Microsoft can only aim for those who do not own a console allready or those who want a new console and their is no "upgrade" for their current cosole and it's games.. and those are few. The people who did not buy a gaming console in the past are most likely not going to buy one now just because Microsoft is the manufacturer. Those who do will most likely ask around their friends to see what they use so they can swap games etc..

    Microsofts best bet is "giving away" the console at very low prices hoping that people with less money to spend will choose their Xbox. Not because of the games, not because of the Microsoft tag and certainly not because of the fact that it is "superior" to other consoles..

    1. Re:It figures by Superkind · · Score: 1
      The people who did not buy a gaming console in the past are most likely not going to buy one now just because Microsoft is the manufacturer.
      I wouldn't say that... I never owned a console in my life, not even something as little as a gameboy, but I played some games on Xbox, and this console really beats the shit out of every other console. When prices keep dropping I think I will get one.

      I'm not sure that the reason for that is that Microsoft is the manufacturer... ever played Wreckless? The graphics and effects are superb. Haven't seen that on a PS2...

      --
      (In desperate search for a cool /. sig.)
    2. Re:It figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm not sure that the reason for that is that Microsoft is the
      >manufacturer... ever played Wreckless? The graphics and effects are
      >superb. Haven't seen that on a PS2...
      >
      And you most likely won't either because the game is utter crap. It's basically a rip-off of Twisted Metal Black for the PS2.

    3. Re:It figures by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      Why would the deciding factor in buying a next gen console be if it could play old games?? Ok, its nicing have the ps2 play older ps1 games but if you already have a ps1 who cares?

      Xbox is targeting many different demographics. The pricecut will help out a lot of people who werent sure if they should go with the xbox because of its price. These people dont care if its backwards compatible with there older games. They want a good deal. Xbox is also releasing tons of games threw out this year. Remember its only been out 5 -6 months. Also the statement that people wont buy it because its manufactured by Microsoft is pretty weak. Do gamers care that there PS2's is made by Sony. Who in which is pushing laws like the DMCA and joining lawsuits against DeCSS? Or that there in bed with the RIAA? Remember Sony has much more revenues then MS. Slashdot crowd should be just as worried about buying a console by Sony.
      Wait until E3. That will really define the rest of this years lineup. I think it will be good.

      Bravo

  73. Innovation by Cam+Wheeler · · Score: 5, Funny

    "With a fast CPU, wizzy graphics card, ethernet, DVD and TV out"

    A game console with tv out? Amazing, it's bound to sell like hotcakes with innovation like this.

    1. Re:Innovation by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      You know, he didn't say that since it has a TV out it will be a good game console. He said that since it has a TV out it will be able to position itself as a lowend PC in the livingroom. Thus the rest of his sentence.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  74. haha good timing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People are saying its cracked. That's the big news on irc tonight.

  75. If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or TiVo by ApheX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1.) The idea that the Microsft would turn the Xbox into a PC? Do you know how hard they have worked to make sure people _DONT_ perceive the Xbox as a PC? Not only would this piss off hardware vendors but it would land them in legal trouble instantly. I don't care what arguement you may have - you will _never_ see the XBox performing as a PC.

    2.) XBox as a DVR (or TiVo type device). Well, considering there currently isn't a TV input for the XBox I dont think this will happen. I suppose they could feed video via ethernet over broadband but this would be insane. Again, the changes of MS doing something like this is next to nothing.

    3.) Chances are if the XBox does fail - its dead. Yes Microsoft has put tons of money behind the Xbox but that doesn't mean they have to keep supporting it if its a loser. Look at UltimateTV - Microsoft put a lot behind that and while they are still providing support for their existing customer base they certainly aren't pushing the product anymore.

    I own an XBox, a PS2 and a Dreamcast. In every market some products win, some fail - not everyone can win. The Xbox hasn't even been out a year yet and everyone is expecting its demise - I would have to give the product at least a year from now to more properly speculate what its life will be like. Only time will tell. The best we can hope for if the Xbox fails is that by some grace of god M$ gives regular users what they need to 'hack' the box. Fat chance.

    As for the MS Hate talk:
    While Slashdot is website built for a community -the boring, redundant "M$ Sucks, M$ is Evil" rhetoric gets really boring, redundant and repetitive. Yes everyone has an opinon but the "Me too!" posts suck - Everyone knows you hate them so shut up already.

    --

    -
    aphex
    I Steal Music!
  76. What about the games by Zarathustra.fi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hoorays for lowering the price of the Xbox unit itself, but what about the games? As a PC gamer enthusiast, the relatively high price of Xbox games at around 100 euros makes me think twice before buying this...thing into my living room. Sure, it's also a DVD player, but most of all, it's a game console, obviously.

    I mean, what fun is it, if I have to think about my budget for the whole month when buying a game? I don't want my game buying decision to be a well-thought, rational financial decision, but instead I just want to think whether this game will be entertaining me enough in order to justify the amount of money I'm giving away for it.

    The high price of the games takes that fun away, and atleast for me, the Xbox remains on the shelf at the local store, waiting for those game prices to come down.

    And really, don't start with that piracy thing and how it really justifies the high price. It doesn't.

    --
    __
    Zarathustra.fi
    Modern man has no goal, no aim, no ideals.
    1. Re:What about the games by squaretorus · · Score: 2

      I mean, what fun is it, if I have to think about my budget for the whole month when buying a game? I don't want my game buying decision to be a well-thought, rational financial decision, but instead I just want to think whether this game will be entertaining me enough in order to justify the amount of money I'm giving away for it.


      Absoblimminlutely!

      I've bypassed the last couple of generations of consoles because I seriously grudge paying £70 for a game. Even £40 or 50 is too high. My Gameboy (original, big grey brick style) has a stack of about 40 games built up mainly over a couple of years when it was new. Thats about £1000 worth of games for a bloody handheld. Why did I spend that - because if I fancied a game I'd spend 25 quid on it and if I got a couple of weeks of fun out of it I was happy.

      But popping into the games shop you don't just splash £70 on a SINGLE game. I can score a decent amount of charlie for that!

      make games £20 again and I'm right back in the market!

    2. Re:What about the games by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      This isnt a Xbox specific problem... I have also looked at buying my beloved PS2 games and decided to screw it and not buy one because of $50.00 to %60.00 USD price tags. I wont bat an eye at spending $30.00 on a game..

      For some reason software companies are thinking that their games are worth top-dollar... and that is not the case.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:What about the games by ronfar · · Score: 1
      You know, I consider myself quite the anglophile but I have to ask, what the heck is "charlie?"

      Oh, and if you get a GP 32, a smart media card, and go to GP Developers to get the free launcher, you can get games for it for free....

      Wolfenstein 3D (the original shareware) and Spear of Destiny (the original shareware) run really well, and they didn't cost me a dime. (Doom is coming along nicely too..)

      For a while if you were looking for reasonable priced games in the U. S., the Dreamcast has been a good choice (I got Unreal Tournament new for just $9.00), too...

      --
      All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
    4. Re:What about the games by mad_dwarf · · Score: 1

      Charlie is slang for cocaine.

      --
      Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
    5. Re:What about the games by squaretorus · · Score: 2
    6. Re:What about the games by BigNachos · · Score: 1

      If you want cheap Xbox games, move to the Seattle area, make friends with a MS employee, and get him or her to buy you games at the Microsoft Store at $10 each. :)

      --
      All glory to the hypno-toad!
    7. Re:What about the games by suicidal · · Score: 1

      I just learned something.

  77. Not even out in NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to some the XBox is already dead. Hasn't even come out in NZ yet. Really sucks living in the third world :(

  78. OK, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where to our partial beloved undergraduate English majors surface?

  79. MS to cut back sales of Xbox by haggar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to this news report, Microsoft expects to sell 3.5 to 4 million units of Xbox, instead of previously planned 4.5 to 6, by end of June this year:

    Microsoft said on Thursday it expected to ship a total of 3.5 million to 4 million Xbox video consoles by the end of June, a drastic scaling back of previous expectations of 4.5 million to 6 million units, due to weak sales in Japan and Europe.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:MS to cut back sales of Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "ship"......not "sell"......it's even worse than it looks. MS is starting to die.....sell those shares now for god's sake.

  80. Don't feed the Beast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America:
    get off the oil.
    get off the 'doze.

  81. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 2, Insightful


    To save your $100 youd have to get around region coded games, incompatable tv color standards, different voltage, lack of locally redemable warranty and the cost of international shipping.

    Actually why don't you go ahead and do that. It sounds like the smartest thing you'll ever do in your life, you damn karma whore.

    --
    _________________
    EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  82. And now for something completely different by thunderbee · · Score: 1

    Lo and behold, as the M$ bashers, bereft of the excuse of a high pricetag, drop all pretense of politiconomical involvement and rush to buy the former devil's instrument now perfecly acceptable since they can afford it.
    *sigh*

    --
    In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
    1. Re:And now for something completely different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good price, yes.
      but what about the games?
      any good games for the xbox that i can't get for ps2? no?

      who needs them stinkin games, i really want a xbox, because IT'S DIRT CHEAP!

      still cube's cheaper

    2. Re:And now for something completely different by suicidal · · Score: 1

      No matter how much you polish a turd, it's just a shiny turd. And in this case, a cheaper shiny turd.

  83. Incredible! by TotoPas · · Score: 1

    Just imagine the initial margins the bast..ds had to be able to cut the price by almost 30%! -- Le Nounours

  84. Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the also brought the price of the games down to A$29.95 then I'd cave in and buy one. It's easy to resist a cheap console when the games are so damn expensive. I think I'll drop by a pawnbroker on the way home from work and see what the average price for a secondhand Xbox game is at the moment...

    1. Re:Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by cobar · · Score: 2

      Prices are cheap. I remember buying games for the Sega Master System for $40-50 over 12 years ago. Today they're still the same price and the cost of developing games is incredibly higher than it was back then.

      Buy 1 or 2 games that you can play for months (like Super Smash Brothers) and the price isn't bad at all.

      On the other hand, new consoles are relatively expensive compared to the $100 Nintendos of the 80's but the prices come down eventually.

    2. Re:Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by misfit13b · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I played $75 for Phantasy Star. Best game on the SMS I ever played, but it sure didn't come cheap.

    3. Re:Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by Tarindel · · Score: 1

      One of the BEST moves Sony made is the re-releasing of older games that sold well. If I remember the fact correctly, if a game has been out for 9 months and has sold at least 400,000 copies, they'll re-release it under the "greatest hits" title for $19.99.

      That way you can pick up tons of older but still great games new at bargain bin prices... That's gotta be highly appealing for those who realize how in the long run the software costs tend to dominate the hardware costs of the console...

    4. Re:Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by cobar · · Score: 2

      Heh, I bought my copy several years later for $20 after playing Phantasy Star 2. Definitely worth it, quite possibly the best 8-bit game ever. Some of the Japanese versions go for $100+ these days.

      I've beaten all 4 of the real games in the series. Man was that game tough.

    5. Re:Yeah, but the games are the real cost. by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      If MS accellerates the release of Xbox games in Australia and very quickly moves popular titles into a bracket like this then they'd probably stand more chance of market penetration down under. For pretty much every console game (and movie/video/DVD) Australia seems to be the last English-speaking country to get it. If Microsoft started doing simultaneous worldwide releases for its games it would actually have something that no other games console had.

      I tell you, if I was s developer that had signed a contract to only develop for the Xbox I'd be mighty worried that the world outside the US (yes, there is one) wouldn't even know I existed.

  85. IE vs Konqueror by netpig · · Score: 1



    " If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly, then I'm all for the removal of Konqueror from KDE."

    Yep, I would too - if I wouldn't have a CHANGE to run something ELSE on top of that BINARY COMPATIBLE PLATFORM. Having no change to run MS Office or for example CorelDraw! without having IE is monopoly.


    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero.
    1. Re:IE vs Konqueror by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly, then I'm all for the removal of Konqueror from KDE."

      Microsoft signed an agreement not to bundle IE with Win9x. That's why bundling it with Win9x is illegal, while bundling a webbrowser with WinNT, KDE, MacOS etc. is not.

      The complete and utter lack of any sense of justice is astonishing in the pro-MS department.

      They really think that MS doesn't have to fullfill their agreements, they think that laws apply to everybody except MS and they also think that when MS just breaks the agreement with a vengeance (like bundling it in a way that it's hard to unbundle it again), the agreement ceases to exist.

      If I manipulate my Ferrari to not go slower than 200, I also can't say later in court that they have to allow me to go faster than 200.

    2. Re:IE vs Konqueror by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      " If IE's Windows integration is a monopoly, then I'm all for the removal of Konqueror from KDE."

      1. You're comparing the wrong progs here, Konqueror has far more functions than *Internet* Explorer - we should talk about removing khtml from KDE

      2. The integration is no monopoly - it is *abuse* of a monopoly (OS) to get another in a different sector (Browser) - Last time I checked KDE neither had a monopoly nor was using it for illegal practices

      jm2 (and absolutely off-topic ones, I know =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  86. Re:If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or T by geekoid · · Score: 2

    "1.) The idea that the Microsft would turn the Xbox into a PC? Do you know how hard they have worked to make sure people _DONT_ perceive the Xbox as a PC? Not only would this piss off hardware vendors but it would land them in legal trouble instantly. I don't care what arguement you may have - you will _never_ see the XBox performing as a PC."

    Of course they don't want it percieved that way, there OS distributers(getawat, Dell, etc...) would drop a brick. No tts a game console. that will, coincedently, be turned into a computer, once it is in a few million homes. MS will be like "Hey we sold a game console, now are customers want a more robust operating system, we're just meet customer demand..."

    Even if this wasn't there original plan, In a desperate move for somebody to save their ass, I can see it going that way.

    "2.) XBox as a DVR (or TiVo type device). Well, considering there currently isn't a TV input for the XBox I dont think this will happen. I suppose they could feed video via ethernet over broadband but this would be insane. Again, the changes of MS doing something like this is next to nothing."
    I wonder if they could use the USB 2.0 port to do that(with adapter, of course)? I tend to agree with you, but if your a company, and your contracted to produce a million units, and your not successful you:
    a)go out of business. Not going to happen with MS
    b)Buy out the contract
    c)Find another use for those products sitting in warehouses costing you money.

    If then X-Box failes, which it is, I would think thet'll go for C.
    As for the MS hate talk, hate talk, if you don't ignore it, it will just ruin your day. Beside someone has to tell the newbies that MS sucks. ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  87. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

    This must be the first time in history an american has considered importing something from australia because its cheaper. What, with our banana-republic currency status, we usually ask friends going to the US to bring back hi-tech goodies.

    Note - all the major governments and corporations (who tend to own the former) are into the idea of globalisation, until it comes to giving the benefits of it to the populations.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
  88. Your head's on backwards. by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry but you sound like a whinging bloody pom....

    But that's not very likely because there's like what 5 of those in the world....

    Here's a tip: Xboxes are NOT required for the survival of you or your family. If you do find you NEED one.... GET A FSKING JOB!!!

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  89. Sony's Response by quantaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It will be interesting to see what Sony does in response. It's seems clear that they will drop prices in response but the question is how much. The way I see it Sony basically has 2 options. First they can drop their price a bit. Keep their profit margins and try and wait it out hoping the X-box doesn't get too big. Or they can respond with their one big price cut and try and hurt MS bad enough to force them out of the market for good. If Sony is able to force MS out of the consol market that is a huge boon for them because that destroys their major competition, right now Sony is very established in that market and I dno't see them giving any ground without a big fight. MS on the other hand has a lot of cash in the bank (I heard someone say it could run for another 10 years without another dime of revenue?!?) and they have a lot of other interests involved with the sucess of X-box (MS in the living room), it will be interesting to see how far MS decides to stick it out. I think the question is how far will this price war go, I can't see MS dropping the price much more but they are ruthless. If Sony doesn't do something big I think X-box is here to stay, MS ain't cashing in their chips at this point and there will be some very heavy competion in the consol market. It will be very interesting to see what kind of response Sony makes to this price cut. We could end up with anything from a Sony-MS split in consols to a corporate game of chicken.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:Sony's Response by zeptic · · Score: 1
      I can't imagine MS beating Sony - here is why:
      • The games for Xbox cost more than those for PS2 -- 5 PS2 games vs. 4 XBox games
      • You can play old PS games on PS2 -- they can be found cheap at the local used-cds-store
      • All your friends have PS or PS2 and you can swap CD's
      • You can mod the PS2 -- now the games are really affordable and you can watch DVD's from other regions!
      • Lowering the prices below cost of producing the hardware is like a deathspasm -- if it doesn't make your heart beat again your'e dead!

      All in all MS doesn't stand a chance -- there are simply too many disadvantages when you compare it to the PS2.
    2. Re:Sony's Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually Sony's consoles were already cheaper then XBox overseas, XBox has been the most expensive slightly above XBox and of course, by a huge amount over GC. Supposedly game manufacturers and other sources all encouraged MS to drop the price of XBox at launch but they didn't listen and have performed below expectations. They may say they are pleased but judging from the company producing the XBox and stockholders, I'm sure they aren't as optimistic as MS :)

    3. Re:Sony's Response by RedX · · Score: 2

      I've read from multiple sources (so no links) the past few weeks that Sony has already been planning to cut the PS2 price in the next couple of months as they gear-up to introduce their new PS2 that contains a hard drive and other enhancements. My first thought when I saw that MS was cutting the XBox price in some markets was that it was MS reacting to Sony's upcoming pricing plans. At any rate, I've been waiting for one of these 2 to hit $200 before I purchase one, now I just have to see whose games are more affordable.

    4. Re:Sony's Response by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      I was the X-Box Martyr last time, so I'll give somebody else a chance on a topic that is guaranteed flame-bait on Slash. Be that as it may, I don't see MS-XBox taking a fall unless they get hurt really, really bad. After all, MS already knows they won't be making a profit until something like 2004 or 2005. The X-Box is already being funded with disposible income. Like you said, it's all about the living room and i can't see MS backing down from that easily. Any tactic that would make a dent in MS would probably hurt Sony just as badly. Isn't Sony already working on a PS3?

      Personally, I like the Sony/MS/Nintendo standoff. The combination of these three big powerhouses means they either make great games (not simply OK ones) or die. Speaking of which, Nintendo's sales are going the way of the N64 in Japan, that is to say poorly. The X-Box I can understand. For the Cube, that's ominous. They need to come up with a killer app quick. Yay... Zelda 12. Whoohoo. Mario... Woot. I mean, Woot.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    5. Re:Sony's Response by filmcritic · · Score: 1
      Your reasons why don't hold water:
      • Games cost the same on both systems when new - $50
      • Why bother playing ancient jagged looking games when you can play modern jagged looking games?
      • No one I know has a PS2..besides, I wouldn't let anyone borrow a game long enough to finish it because I paid the cash for it, not them
      • Yes that's it - PIRATE those "inexpensive-compared-to-Xbox" games....ask Dreamcast owners about that one. Rampant piracy of games was a reason why the Dreamcast died.
      • Microsoft is already losing around $100 per Xbox now....most consoles are sold at a loss you idiot. You didn't know that because your head is so far up your ass.

      Whatcha gonna do when the Xbox continues to sell and you can't do a thing about it? Go cry to the government like Netscape did? WAAAA WAAAA...go suck on your bottle crybaby.
    6. Re:Sony's Response by Tarindel · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that Sony recently shrunk the Emotion Engine and Graphics Synthesizer into a single chip (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/06/13372 50&mode=thread). This should reduce their costs by quite a bit as it means they'll need less chips per machine and less supporting hardware. My guess is that Sony is busting butt to get a PsTwo out using the new chip, at which time they'll lower the price to $199 to compete with the Xbox and Gamecube -- yeah profit margins will suffer a little bit, but not near as bad as with the two chip versions. I would expect to see an announcement around E3 time (in late May). Until then, they might very well just use the momentum they've accumulated to glide by.

    7. Re:Sony's Response by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >Sony doesn't do something big I think X-box is here to stay, MS ain't
      >cashing in their chips at this point and there will be some very heavy
      >competion in the consol market. It will be very interesting to see
      >what kind of response Sony makes to this price cut. We could end up
      >with anything from a Sony-MS split in consols to a corporate game of
      >chicken.
      >
      >
      The XBox is on it's way to becoming the new Amiga. All the really interesting and sought-after console (Japanese and European) games are going to be showing up on the PS2 and Gamecube. Xbox is going to get stuff from PC game companies (Which won't really appeal to console gamers).

  90. Re:If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    XBox was originally going to be a settop box. They focused on gaming when nobody believed that they could make a game console and tivo all in one. I expect that the very next generation of XBox will have some Office Light, web browser, and VCR as well as games.

    USB Keyboard and mouse? count on it.

  91. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

    Still seems to be alot of sets out there that dont support PAL. I know the TV we purchased 18 months ago (still pretty decent though) doesn't support NTSC, however our VCR does so I just play any NTSC N64 games I've got via the video player.

    So I think it'd be foolish for MS to release an xbox on the assumption that everyone has TVs that can play NTSC. It's a PAL market, it'd have to output in PAL.

  92. How to save more money... by albino+eatpod · · Score: 1

    In the UK, the XBox is £299, now dropping to £199. So if I buy an XBox at £299 now (the price drop isn't until 26th April AFAIK) then I get a 2 free games and a controller (worth 2x£45 + £30 = £120). Therefore, by buying at the older price, I've saved myself more money :)

    Now... Just need to find somewhere that doesn't sell them in bundles :(

    1. Re:How to save more money... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      'Fraid not, cos a game costs even less to produce (its just a bit of plastic stamped with data), £1 at most. Just like with everything else, the developement costs are easily paid for in the price (i dunno - £5) leaving a great deal of it as profit for those gready crack-sniffing pigs. Even the controller sells for less than one game. Just like with playstation and everything else. Microsoft just wants to own your living room. I suppose its their product and their right, but i just get pissed when people say its a good deal

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:How to save more money... by artg · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you rather choose the 2 games yourself instead of getting the cheapest, worst games they can get away with ?

    3. Re:How to save more money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shop at a DSG retail group store ... we have shit loads & I MEAN SHIT LOADS of them cmone microsoft munchers buy now pay forever .....

  93. Re:You forgot one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the Texas Instruments 99/4a :)

  94. SuperComputer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess XBox are sponsored by Microsoft, like every gameconsol the company normaly loses money on the consol.. but gain the money from selling games..

    I wounder if these things would be good in a beowulf cluster. I meen, even tho its microsoft.. they do look kinda cool..

  95. Why the double standards? by HaggiZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How come sony dropping the price to edge out microsoft is a huge boon, but microsoft dropping them to beat sony is them being ruthless? You see this constantly on slashdot. Sure MS dont stick to standards, dont have the most superior product, etc etc. In the end though their loyalties lie not to "the industry" but to the share holders. I dont think at any stage microsoft should be sitting back going "what is the best thing I can do for the IT world today? oh not release a new OS because this one is just dandy!" they should be going "get a new OS out faster, we need to keep our share holders happy". Yes it's not ideal, but it's simply intelligent business practice and they deserve every cent they can squeeze out of people. Nobody has any right to complain, we drive the market. Dont like the product, dont buy it. If it's a success, bad luck you were in the minority. Want to do something about it? All the whining flaming trolls on here who hate MS should buy up as many shares as they can and influence the direction of the company. I sincerly doubt many of you would maintain your stance were the outcome going to affect your own back pocket* *please dont take as a dig to the initial poster, just a criticism of the ever increase MS hate fud on slashdot of late.

    1. Re:Why the double standards? by blank · · Score: 1
      from a business point of view, yes, they are pretty smart people. we should congradulate them.

      But, from a personal point of view, i hate their guts. i use to be a sysadmin and it brought me hatred for the company. i had to maintain windows boxes (desktops and servers) and for industry strength products i had to reboot them constantly. if i didn't i would be woken up at 3am to go down to work and reboot them. even in some cases i had to wake up at 3am to go down and reboot them. it required that we have redundant machines for one service on a windows platform. that meant 2 more machines i had to maintain compared to the alternatives. when security holes were found it took them a very long time to release a patch. my job was to just say "okay, i'll wait while my server is vunerable". worst yet when they release the servie packs for windows it would include the latest patches but also include new features and bugs if not more security holes. i'll stop there with this part of my rant.

      and don't get me started on the MS certified money grubbing dorks. they make me hate MS even more.

      i just felt like i've been burned so many times for using MS products that ,yes, i have a double standards to them. i've taken it personal. i don't trust them and have been burned so many times by their products. For god sakes they stood up in court and nationally lied! what was up with the fake video presentation? they are showing that they are above the law and this makes me hate them more.

      MS leaves a bad taste in my mouth so i want them gone. Sony only made bad wireless phones but provided nice equipment and entertainment that i want them to stay. long live the PS2 becuase it hasn't hurt me the way MS has.

      --

      bah. start over

    2. Re:Why the double standards? by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      "Dont like the product, dont buy it."

      Yeah, just *try* to buy a computer without a Microsoft OS. Yes, us geeks can build our own, but we do not comprise the majority of the market any longer, so it is silly to tell the unwashed masses to just "dont buy" a preassembled computer but instead build your own. Not getting MS discounts on MS operating systems is immediate suicide for an OEM, so no mass market OEM would dare to provide that option.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    3. Re:Why the double standards? by DapperDan · · Score: 1
      Yeah, just *try* to buy a computer without a Microsoft OS.

      Umm...Ok.

      How about this?

    4. Re:Why the double standards? by quantaman · · Score: 2

      My use of the world ruthless wasn't based on bias. I decided to use that word for to reasons. First Microsofts buisness practices have often been described as ruthless (one of the reasons they have that bad reputation). The second reason which was the one I was thinking of was the fact that MS, not Sony, is on the offensive. Ruthless is an adverb much better used to describe an attack than a defense. I was deliberatly trying to be more or less objective when I posted. Don't worry I didn't take it personally, I think most of the MS bashing is out of fear. It's MS's duty to make as much money as they can however they can. However because they are so powerful right now their present stance and future direction are a detrement rather than a boon to the industry. I don't blame MS personally, they're metely doing what they have to, but I will still fight them to maintain my rights as I have to and as in any conflct it may start to get personal.

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Why the double standards? by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

      I understand, and my post was in no way meant to attack you or your post directly. Just to highlight something that is really bugging me on here lately :)

    6. Re:Why the double standards? by HaggiZ · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point. Its a smart move for microsoft, and the majority of the market actually dont have any problem with it. Sure you can try and justify it as "well they dont know any better" all you like. The fact is, it suits their needs for most purposes and is the easiest option for them.

      If something doesn't suit your needs or you dont like it, it's not the responsibility of some large organisation to read your mind or just supply it to you for no other good reason. Go find something that does suit your needs or complain.

  96. XBox hurting Microsoft's profits, cuts sales by dipfan · · Score: 1

    It's significant that the XBox price cuts were announced just before Microsoft's first quarter sales figures yesterday, which were worse than expected, thanks to the XBox. Quote from the Financial Times: Microsoft missed earnings forecasts for the quarter to March 31 and issued lower than expected revenue and earnings predictions ... The world's largest software company blamed the warning on modest prospects for information technology spending by business and disappointing sales of the Xbox console. The price were partly to keep Wall Street happy and the stock price up as much as boosting sales.

    The article says MS has cuts its sales forecast for the XBox to 3.5-4 million by the end of June 30, instead of 4.5-6 million. And it might have given up on cracking the Japanese market: The company said Japan had been challenging for the Xbox. "We have not had much traction and sales have not been as large as we had hoped." The full article is here

    The same article links a very interesting FT article on where exactly Microsoft makes its money, and - surprise, surprise - despite all its efforts to find profits outside the PC software market, it's still Windows and Office that produce almost all of MS's money.

  97. Xbox about �160 in Switzerland by u02sgb · · Score: 1

    I'm working in Switzerland and saw the Xbox advertised for 399CHF today in a shop called X-point (in Zurich). That's about 160 GBP, which I thought was even pretty cheap for a DVD player. Don't know if it's a special offer or an across the board price reduction though.

  98. haha sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (big thank you to the person who did this)

    cscx's Journal
    Mod bombed again!!
    Friday April 12, @09:46PM [ Add Friend | 0 Comments | #6930 ]
    Quickies Moderation of "Re:people in windows dont know about gimp" (-1 Flamebait) Saturday April 13, @12:25AM
    Moderation of "Re:Java vs C#" (-1 Flamebait) Saturday April 13, @12:26AM
    Moderation of "Re:Microsoft?" (-1 Flamebait) Saturday April 13, @12:27AM
    Moderation of "Re:Please explain" (-1 Overrated) Saturday April 13, @12:28AM
    Moderation of "Re:Please explain" (-1 Overrated)Saturday April 13, @12:29AM

  99. Little known fact. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    You know that "X" that's on the Xbox? In Australia it's detachable. So not only do you get the Xbox for the nice price of $200 USD, you also get two nifty boomerangs that can help you impale your much smarter neighbors who used their money to buy Playstations and Gamecubes.

    Now you get their systems too. 3 systems for 200 dollars... Score!

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  100. Existing Owners Get Two ExtraGames - Whoopee (not) by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 2, Informative

    People who have already bought an X-Box (or won one in my case - I'm not that stupid) can get two free games plus an extra controller (see http://www.xbox.com/uk/news/0025.htm)

    Trouble is, of the games on offer, you're certain to already have at least one and the others might not really appeal (speaking as someone who took Amped back to the shop and got his money back).

    The games are:

    Halo
    Rallisport Challenge
    Project Gotham Racing
    Amped
    Oddworld: Munch's Oddysee
    Dead or Alive 3
    Bloodwake
    Fuzion Frenzy

    Still, it's probably worth getting them just to use as coffee mats - it costs M$oft money and that can only be a good thing...

    --
    They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  101. that's what they try to hide by blametheduck · · Score: 1

    You're right, but by lowering prices for the XBox, they lure people to a new platform - once it's established they start cashing in on the games.
    Compare to pirated Windows copies that helped to establish the platform for MS Office.

  102. Modding Xbox by Polo+monkey · · Score: 1

    I know you Americas like it big (big cars, big houses, big Apple) but us Euros like things a little smaller. So, anyone tried to mod their Xbox into a smaller case? Presumably as the hardware is similar to a PC it shouldn't be that difficult.

    1. Re:Modding Xbox by DaveSchool · · Score: 1

      I've got news for you, EVERYONE hates the size of the XBox, Microsoft is too stupid to realize that though, oh well.

  103. It isn't that cheap by Alain+Williams · · Score: 1

    I recently bought for £346 ($484) a complete system: AMD Duron 1GHz, 128Mb RAM, 20Gb disk, 1.44 floppy, on-board modem, keyboard, mouse, speakers, 52x CDROM, 15" monitor. I put in an ethernet card & installed Linux straight off.

    The price of Xbox in the UK is now £199 ($287).

    Yes, the Xbox is cheaper but doesn't come with so much RAM, a keyboard, monitor, floppy, speakers. But does have a onboard ethernet. Now: if they were to bring the price down to £70 ($100), that would be worth considering as the basis of a desktop workstation - anyone know were I can get an SVGA card to plug in to the Xbox ?

    All prices include VAT.

  104. They don't have to - regional locks on devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-box peripherals are regionally coded so you can't use a controller bought in Japan in an American X-box etc.

  105. Universties being used for advertising by XBOX/MS by csirac · · Score: 1

    I live on Campus at a university in Brisbane. Here, in Brisbane, you will see XBOX bill boards, signs, bus stop posters, bus ads, newspaper ads etc. But that's not all. The constant, continuous, uninterrupted supply of XBOX posters all over the university. When the XBOX launch happend in Australia, Microsoft hired out an entire lecture theatre here for a few weeks just to demo these things to the public. They put posters all over the university; but never have we seen any other commercial advertising in the same place - on notice boards for faculties/schools, outside theatres; but that's not all. Typical commercialised Griffith Uni... ooops did I say that... Like I said I live on campus. Microsoft jerks *actually* came around to all the floors in the building I live in (and probably all the others too) and wrote on our message boards, dropped pamphlets everywhere, chalked demo times/dates on the concrete for us, put up posters (not just one here and there, at least 3 at a time) and it was just a constant stream. I've never seen anything like it. So me and some friends made pirate hats out of the XBOX posters and showed up to a public campus demo. Without our consent, they took two photos (one wide, one closeup) of us and said "now you're going on the internet". I don't know if we really are on the 'net. If they did, they would probably say "hey look at these XBOX fans". It's so gay... Some folks went around and put stickers on ALL XBOX posters saying "This company has performed an illegal operation. If this problem persists, stop using their software". If you look close at the photo (if you ever see three dudes in pirate hats on the 'net, please let me know), you should see on at least one of the hats one such sticker. I can only conclude MS spent far more on advertising than actual development... too bad it still smells. - Paul

  106. The Great Plot(TM) by netpig · · Score: 1


    The real plot here is to distribute those boxes (and others to come) into households and keep low noise at the beginning. Give them out practically for free and make all kind of devices from entertainment boxes to toasters and microwave owns. Behave pretty and people buy them (and if they don't - lower the price, it's irrelevant at the beginning).

    But you didn't notice the one thing - the network. Yes, Xbox has it already and nobody talks about it, nobody uses it.

    The early software releases will be bug free until the penetration is widespread enough. The next step is to return into business as usual and release buggy software and often. People purchase more frequently new versions (increased cash flow) and because The Great Xbox has the hard drive it establishes patching.

    Having said that, you need to connect your box into net. And download what they call service packs. I case you didn't notice who's purpose it serves, look back into their instant messenger (and others, you tell me, I'm not hooked into their systems and never will be) which stores all your privacy information into net. And when patching, they install tons of software as new features what they forgot to tell you.

    Also, they will hook Xbox and forthcoming Ybox and Zbox into passport, so nobody is able to use your microwave or open your fridge without your permission. Or you to do so, without MS knowing about it.

    Having done that, they start collecting information about you. Having done that all day in your work, they are doing it also in your free time and building a perfect profile from you. What would be more interesting information to marketing (read spammer's) point of view? Again, increased cash flow.

    In their visions, they look at future where they know what TV programs you watch, what video on demand movies you order, what music or radio channel you listen, what kind of food you eat, when you wake up, how much band width you use, VoIP calls, others...

    Even the Xbox looks pretty game box, works pretty well and has no big bugs - I wouldn't believe that company. Been there, seen that, done that. The same evil people are behind that, doing the same evil plot to cash you.

    And this time they are selling your privacy.


    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero.
  107. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In reality no one but MS and its suppliers knows how much the Xbox costs to produce. Its been bantered about as being as high as $150 and as low as $0(at $299). No one knows but MS and Flextronics. The Xbox has done better in its first 6 months in the NA market than the PS2 did in its first 6 months. The Xbox is doing extremely well in the US, better than GC, not as good as the PS2, but thats because it has MORE games.

    MS has a full deck of cards up its sleeve, E3 is going to be interesting...

  108. Region coding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peripherals and certain games such as Championship Manager look to be region locked so you can't mix and match hardware and software bought from different parts of the world.

  109. MS gives away "free" gifts to early buyers by FlyveHest · · Score: 1

    Here in Denmark, its only been a little more than a month since XBox release (initial price 4000 dkr), and now on the 26th the price drops to 2500 dkr.

    If I had bough at box at the launch price, i'd be pretty pissed, so I guess thats why MS has instigated a compensation gift for the people that where so "unlucky" as to go out and buy an XBox fast.

    You get 2 games (own choice, I think), and an extra controller, if you react before 1st of July.

  110. xbox = open source companies ?? not quite but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$ goes on and on about how open source won't work as you can not give something away for free and expect to make money from it. Companies built around open source expect to get money from services, support, etc.
    In a way, M$ is after the same thing, give the hardware away, and expect the money from other review channels (games, upgrades..). So at the end of the day seems, that M$ is embracing the "open source" bussiness model, sort of....

    just a thought....

    /V

  111. what "free" stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hopefully M$ will give away a copy of LixBox, a version of Linux specially optimised for the box, so you can install it and get rid of current win2k or whatever it is os...., the we will talk about the xbox experience............

    :)

  112. Re:Real OS? by blane.bramble · · Score: 1

    For the record, my Spectrum was better than your C64. Now that's started a flame war (at least, for all the British posters to /.)...

    You can't start a flame war by stating irrefutable facts!

  113. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did he buy one if he hates them
    He didn`t, he hates them becouse he ;-)

  114. Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you mean the games don't appeal to Japanese? Kabuki Warrior has an oriental japanese theme, so why don't they like that it is just like their japanese kung fu martial art games.

    1. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, and I'm just waiting for the Cowboy and Indians games to come out here in the US before I buy one.

    2. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by byran+lei · · Score: 1

      >What do you mean the games don't appeal to Japanese? Kabuki Warrior
      >has an oriental japanese theme, so why don't they like that it is just
      >like their japanese kung fu martial art games.
      >
      >
      And Vanilla Ice is African American because he did rap. Moron.

    3. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (What do you mean the games don't appeal to Japanese? Kabuki Warrior has an oriental japanese theme, so why don't they like that it is just like their japanese kung fu martial art games.)

      Idiot, this game is the WORST Xbox game out now.

    4. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm not saying Vanilla Ice is African American. I am saying that African Americans should like Vanilla Ice because he is acknowledging and respecting their culture.

    5. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

      yeah, you obviously know your shit. I'd like to hire you as the director of overseas marketing for my new product called "FUCK YOU AC".

      --
      _________________
      EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
    6. Re:Isn't Kabuki Warrior Japanese? by Ralph+Malph+Alpha · · Score: 0

      Yeah, okay that one was pretty good. BEE MINUS.

      --
      _________________
      EBAY SAFETY TIPZ!
  115. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with US?

    The answer is no, it's not compatible. Games have different encodings for different regions.

  116. oooooo by fktup · · Score: 1

    They cant give them away.

  117. Thank-You Package by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

    I heard on TV yesterday that to appease those annoyed at having paid the original price, MS offer a "Thank-You Package". If you bought your console before the 26th April and you apply before the 1st July you can get the package which gives you two games and a controller for free. Sounds good. UK only, AFAIK.

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
  118. How to speak Australian by sarcast · · Score: 1

    XBox, Australian for: (your choice)
    1. Footrest
    2. Space Heater
    3. Beer

  119. Re:True by CyberDruid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am quite certain that you are not allowed to sell for less than manufacturing costs in the EU.

    A few weeks ago, I read an article about MS wanting to cut the prices on xbox, but that EU threatened to take them to court if they did. Now, just a few weeks later, they do it anyway and not a single word about that law is heard. I smell some heavy lobbying.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  120. Re:Real OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And my Atari STF was much better than those horrible Amigas.

    And GEM and TOS are still much better than Windows.

  121. LET'S SPELL IT TOGETHER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C O M P A T I B L E

    1. Re:LET'S SPELL IT TOGETHER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

  122. LET'S SPELL IT TOGETHER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    L O S E

  123. Sell Outs... by boopus · · Score: 1

    This is obviously a paid advertisment for microsoft products. How much did Bill pay them to get their price drop posted on slashdot anyways? :-)

  124. same as the others by elveu · · Score: 1

    here is australia:
    playstation 2 is currently $399
    gamecube is set for $399 on release
    so really at this price it is only the equal of the other consoles
    (guess there are some advantages of living in australia)

  125. Karma. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is what they get because of their illegal monopoly ways, if the condition happened BEFORE the anti-trust happened, MS might have destroyed Sony and Nintendo a long time ago.

    As it stands, people IN GENERAL ARE aware of MS bad ways and are burned by their constant securuty holes, endless service packs, etc.
    TRUE, xbox IS a great product, most multi-platform games end up with XBOX having the best version. but because of the MS label, people instrictively consider their decision to buy one.
    xbox is also a "Me Too!" console, from the start their goal is to DESTROY PS2, which they are'nt doing now. they should have concentrated with just bringing GOOD QUALITY titles instead of worrying what the others have been doing.

    oh and by the way, once Mario Sunshine and Legend Zelda comes out expect carbon copies of these games from MS, Bob Sunset and Smelda's Legend everyone?

  126. Sorry MS, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IMHO, I dont want MS invading my living room, I've had enough of their evil ways and maybe this is my way of saying I dont condone to their ways.

  127. Once again: America and the rest of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for this (price drops) is that they sold not as many units as they wanted, especially in Japan, Europe and Australia. Now if just you Americans could also stop buying Microsoft products...

  128. Are you suggesting... by Crag · · Score: 2

    Are you suggesting MS's biggest (only?) competition is underwear gnomes?

    Hm, Gnomes...perhaps it's time for an underwear theme for Gnome...

    1. Re:Are you suggesting... by cobar · · Score: 1

      No, you idiot, he's implying that most free software companies go into software development with a business plan as an afterthought.

      MS is insanely profitable. Partly because they paid no taxes the last 2 years.

    2. Re:Are you suggesting... by kubrick · · Score: 1

      Are you suggesting MS's biggest (only?) competition is underwear gnomes?

      You may laugh now, but terrible things will happen when Bill Gates wakes up and finds that all of his 200 pairs of boxer shorts are missing :)

      Maybe MS will then 'take a month off from developing software' in order to search for these misguided creatures...

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  129. But what games are thier to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what if the console is cheaper(not is the US) what games are thier that I would want to play on it?

  130. Microsoft doesn't want to build X-Boxes by jpmorgan · · Score: 1
    Microsoft doesn't really want to build X-Boxes. I just can't see Bill Gates and Steve Balmer getting excited over a beige box. Anyway, it's just not very profitable.

    Microsoft is interested in producing consumer hardware, but only to establish these devices as new platforms for them to sell software on. In this respect, they're simply interested in creating a market for new products. They also know what they're good at, and what they're not. Microsoft isn't a hardware company, they're not particularly good at building hardware, and they don't want to build hardware. Why are they carrying the X-Box, then? Simple business: they loose money on each X-Box sold to keep them competetive with PS2s and Game Cubes, but while Microsoft is willing to carry this loss for the promise of large future profits for them, it's much harder to convince independent hardware manafacturers to carry a loss for Microsoft's future profits.

    I mean, hell, their original plan was to release a reference design for the "HomeStation" sometime later this year as a device that encapsulated functionality of both UltimateTV and XBoxes, and to let the hardware manafacturers produce these devices, just like you see now with PocketPCs.

    1. Re:Microsoft doesn't want to build X-Boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also know what they're good at, and what they're not. Microsoft isn't a hardware company, they're not particularly good at building hardware, and they don't want to build hardware.

      Hmm. So, for what reason are they building software?

      ...Haha, I know...

  131. What ever happened to getting... by dalutong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GNU/Linux to run on this thing?

    I'm not super programmer, but I'd be quite happy if some kid (or adult) somewhere figured out how to make one of these a nice little computer system.

    After all, a $200 computer for the parents and a happy smile (for taking the cost out of Gate's pocket) would make a happy, happy man. (Is there something wrong when you feel joy at another man's loss?)

    --

    What comes first, finding a teacher or becoming a student?
    1. Re:What ever happened to getting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would make a nice rendering farm for real cheap

  132. Re:True by perky · · Score: 2

    That's strange: every mobile phone shop in the country must be breaking the law by selling phones for less than their manufacturing cost. You are talking absolute nonsense. Why would the european union sue MS for selling Xboxes cheaply? What european industry would be protected by such a move?

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  133. EU prices by Dw0rkin · · Score: 1

    From 479 Euro (two days ago) to 299 Euro again. There was a drop to 399 Euro at the launch but the price was at 479 Euro a day after that. I heard rumor that people who bought an XBox this week in Europe for 479 get a free controller and two free games, but I couldnt find any confirmation on that.

  134. false by Dw0rkin · · Score: 1

    There was no such law. Resellers were dropping the XBox price and MS forced them up to the suggested retail price. Here is what happened:

    At the launch day the big chains dropped the price from 479 Euro (419.63 US) to 399 Euro (349.52 US) for two days, which resulted in utter chaos, because smaller resellers were unable to go that low. (and most of them bought their boxes from the bigger chains - "Media Markt" and "Saturn" - for reselling) The price went up again soon after that though.

    Here's the numbers from MCV-online [German]:

    Germany - 10.000 units in the first three days (compared to this, the PS2 sold 70.000 units in Germany after two days when it was launched in November 2001)

    France - less than 10.000 units in the first three day.

    Great Britain - 48.000 units, the best results in Europe.

    Microsoft only verified the numbers for GB, but the method for surveying them was the same in all three countries.

  135. Try looking at prices again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    X-Box is still $400 in the U.S., you can pick up a decent computer at Best Buy for $300 with a real monitor, keyboard, and mouse included.

  136. Yet another MS bashing post.. by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 1

    *yawn*

  137. Oops... Make that 31,999,996 people in Canada by toofast · · Score: 1

    Because Americans give Friendly Fire a whole new meaning.

    1. Re:Oops... Make that 31,999,996 people in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the americans should learn to use the weapons they are so proud of. BFA!!

  138. I've played Halo, and it's excellent... by Wonderkid · · Score: 1
    Forgetting all the politics, pricing and pro and con Microsoft talk, I got to play Halo for a few hours in a store in London the other day, and no matter what one thinks of MS or the other consoles that were also on display, Gamecube and PS2 included of course, here are my comments:

    a) The graphics are near perfect, with NO jaggies

    b) There was NO slowdown

    c) Most importantly, the physics and sense of realism was outstanding and intelligent, including the way the vehicle you move around in responds if it hits something or you drive it off a cliff. It was like a radio controlled car! d) Attention to detail, such as looking up close at artifacts and items left by dead enemies. I know PC games do all this, but at the new price, the graphics this machine generates are a bargain.

    I mention all this because what counts is that if a product is compelling enough, people will save up and buy it. This happened with the Palm Pilot. Sales were slow initially as people tried to understand it. But once word of mouth spreads and bank accounts fill up, sales will begin. A price cut too early on can frighten the consumer (who does NOT read /.) into thinking that the product is on the way out, meaning the end of a future supply of games. After all, no matter how good Halo is, once the mission is complete, one wants more!

    BTW, the graphics on Gamecube Waveracer were jaggy, althought the water effects are very releastic. Star Wars is ok, but reminded me of a 1980s game, a little distant and on rails in a way. No jaggies though. Oh, and the controller on the Gamecube is the best I have ever used. Lovely big FIRE button. Xbox controller too large. We need compromise! (PS3?)

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  139. Re:True by jenssoderberg · · Score: 1

    In the mobile phone case it's the operators who are subsidicing the costs of the phone not the manufacturer of the phone.

    --
    /. AC "Concrete lifejackets could get certified under ISO2002"
  140. Re:Real OS? by kpetruse · · Score: 1

    I agree. Something strange I've noticed is that people who had Spectrums always had ST's, and those with C64's always had Amigas. I guess that we thought the C64 sucked so badly that we couldn't face buying an Amiga. But this is rapidly veering off topic.

  141. DVD player? It doesn't worth by paugq · · Score: 1

    I don't know in your country, but here in Spain a you can find a NoBrand [tm] DVD player for only 120 EUR (105$ US). And a Samsung, LG, etc. (mid-brand) one costs 180 EUR (150$ US). Of course, you can also get extra-expensive ones.

  142. Buy a Dreamcast by potnoodle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's still the best gaming experience money can buy, and the graphics hold up quite well in the face of PS2 & xbox (with the only regret that Sega never released a proper soccer game). Shame that these wretches who call themselves game distributors don't get it and stop taking kids for complete morons with lame games (yes, that's you, Oddcrap) when for a fraction of the price of that 1970's VCR with a green X on it, you can play 4 player Power Stone 2 or Rez or Bangai-O. Ah, but you have to like games more than ripping people off... tough choice!

    1. Re:Buy a Dreamcast by heideggier · · Score: 1
      The Dreamcast stopped selling in Australia well over a year ago, and even if you were able to find one in a pawn shop or the trading post (I haven't had much luck) then there is little chance of being able to buy any of the games (or even rent them), unless you pirate them off the internet, which isn't really an option in Australia since the broadband is so bad.

      Course your right that the Dreamcast was a good console for the time, and if this was a perfect world it would still be going.

      I think that a underground scean is growing for the dreamcast in America, where, like the XBOX, it was a success to begin with, and the same thing will probally happen with the XBOX, but sadly good intentions are not enough to keep these things going, No matter how many people like Army's of Darkness it doesn't mean that a sequal is going to be made since, at the end of the day, the original was such a box office flop, deal with it.

      --
      Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  143. Re:LET'S SPELL IT TOGETHER! (OT) by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

    I still don't get it... was that one or two o's?? and are the spaces in between compulsory?

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  144. SVHS should be better than composite signal.... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    "I've SVHS into a 36" TV, looks lovely and sounds good. Only one DVD/Audio-phile friend notices the
    difference."

    Speaking of picture, it should be better looking since the cable called SVHS is always better than composite because it uses 2 cables in fact, a Yellow and a Cyan signal. Thats why electronics and TV guys call it Y/C.

    The RGB, for Europe, do they use Euro Connector? If so, it only has a composite signal, not seperate RGB signals as PC monitors have. If it had, it would be great way to connect our gfx cards to TV.

    What I mean is, especially on these DVD days, go for SVHS equipped connections if you have chance. You won't have "mega" resolution increase but mostly cleaner/realistic/sharper colours. Er, for people who doesn't know what it is, its the connector looks like exactly a PS/2 mouse/keyboard connector.
    Oh btw, I am not into console gaming so sorry if I confused something and/or there are evil/lame tactics those companies "invented".

    1. Re:SVHS should be better than composite signal.... by shippo · · Score: 1

      In the UK the PS2 comes with a composite cable using a 19-pin SCART connector. Only some of the pins are connected. This doesn't give the "green screen" on DVD playback. SCART sockets have been standard on televisions for many years now.

      There is also available an RGB connector with a SCART cable, it is this that gives the "green screen" on DVD playback. Only recent televisions have SCART connectors that are RGB capable.

      Finally there is the S-Video cable, which doesn't give the "green screen". S-Video connections on televisions are rare.

      Some independant vendors have been selling PS2 SCART cables that can be switched between Composite and RGB.

      Purchasing a copy of the 3rd party disc RegionX will remove the "green screen" on playback and also allows the playing of Region 1 DVDs on European equipment. Unfortunatly this doesn't work on all models of the PS2, so I hear. It is also possible to make an internal mod to the PS2 to remove the "green screen" problems.

    2. Re:SVHS should be better than composite signal.... by Dahan · · Score: 2
      Speaking of picture, it should be better looking since the cable called SVHS is always better than composite because it uses 2 cables in fact, a Yellow and a Cyan signal. Thats why electronics and TV guys call it Y/C.

      Actually, Y/C is luminance (black and white part) and chroma (color part). I don't know why luminance is Y :)

      And component video is Y/Cb/Cr--luminance, and two color difference channels (Blue - Y and Red - Y).

    3. Re:SVHS should be better than composite signal.... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I mean since its seperate signals, it will look more real and natural.

      Speaking of Y/C, its yellow and cyan in my jargon (video editing is my job), there is also a much better connection (component) as you said. Are you sure about luminance and chroma? Whats I use is Yellow/Cyan and a sync signal (of course)

      Sorry I was kinda confused but, I was trying to say people to use/buy devices with "SVHS" connectors in these times.

  145. Yeah but there's no games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I like the price drop, I haven't seen any really good games advertised for the system - BloodWake? Please.

    Until there's something else besides Halo, it's not worth it.

    BM
    Developer
    RECRUITLogics.Com

  146. Re: It's back-Another thread /. editors want to su by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This works for me:
    127.0.0.1 images.slashdot.org
    In the host file

    I don't get the pictures but I don't care....

  147. Re:Real OS? by artg · · Score: 1

    > about Linux being "a proper OS" - how many games are available on it?

    That's an interesting perspective. The success of a gaming platform is usually inversely related to the capabilities of its OS.

  148. Console strategies by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I guess that means we've entered Phase 2 of the Console Cycle: strategic price adjustments.

    Clearly the Xbox is not doing so hot. Mindshare reigns supreme in such things. From my own (long, sordid, embarrasing) experience with console gaming, all it takes is for gamers to start with the 'ConsoleX is dead' talk. Which is infuriating from a certain point of view (just ask a DreamCast owner), but that's the way things go. The game market is like the stock market - perception is everything.

    So now we have MS losing over $100 US on ever Xbox, and Sony has announced PS2 on a chip, which will significantly, drive the cost down. This has got to drive MS nuts, as they're not used to competing on these terms (i.e. brutally efficient hardware manufacturing. Really, who wants to compete with the Japanese here.) They know they need control of the living room. It's the beachhead for the next battle. And Sony is entrenched like a mntherfncker.

    Didn't Microsoft's slogan used to be "a computer on every desk and in every home in America", or something to that effect? Always thought that was odd for a software company... well, before they started putting their OS into phones, consoles, and Things With Buttons.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Console strategies by kubrick · · Score: 2

      I guess that means we've entered Phase 2 of the Console Cycle: strategic price adjustments.

      The interesting thing in Australia being that this comes roughly 5 weeks after the launch of the console. That's looking less like strategy and more like panic by the local distributors, and could be a death blow locally unless the games ramp up quickly.

      (The fact that it's selling this poorly means that not enough other people might have one -- and I know what happens after that, I have three Atari Lynxes :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:Console strategies by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      From my own (long, sordid, embarrasing) experience with console gaming, all it takes is for gamers to start with the 'ConsoleX is dead' talk. Which is infuriating from a certain point of view (just ask a DreamCast owner), but that's the way things go.

      Heh, I've been saying that Sony's consoles have been dead for about 5 years now, those poor Playstation owners have an amazing amount of denial built up and just look at me through the veil of their own distorted reality like I was crazy.

      Dreamcast fanatics have it easy, filtered graphics, $50 consoles. Let them eat cake. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  149. ...speaking of redundant... by CygnusTM · · Score: 1

    As for the MS Hate talk: While Slashdot is website built for a community -the boring, redundant "M$ Sucks, M$ is Evil" rhetoric gets really boring, redundant and repetitive. Yes everyone has an opinon but the "Me too!" posts suck - Everyone knows you hate them so shut up already.

    Who's redundant again?

  150. Re:True by perky · · Score: 2

    quite correct. In which case I point to inkjet printers and razors as other examples of products that are sold as loss leaders in order to gain a captive market for the refills. Which is the same as the Xbox - MS want market share so they sell the hardware as a loss leader in order to create a market for the games and accessories, and to get people used to MS hardware.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  151. Re:sell at loss? Nay, Listen Ye to the Almight Gor by JMMurphy · · Score: 1

    No, Sony does not sell at a loss. Nintendo, Sega, and Microsoft, however, do sell at a loss. Read the prophetic words of the Almighty Gord. http:// www.actsofgord.com/Proclamations/chapter02. html

    This a fairly recent developtment... Sony began making a profit on the PS2 console only within the last few months, after being in production for almost two years. MS, OTOH, has a console less than half a year old, is still losing money on production, and is now cutting the price in two territories. Doesn't look good.

    Nintendo, also, loses a miniscule amount of money compared to Microsoft. If they lost the same amount, the Gamecube would be selling for no more than a hundred. AND... This is the first console Nintendo has ever sold at cost.

    random

  152. The disc doesn't spin backward by yerricde · · Score: 3, Informative

    The DVD is probably all proprietary stuff - since it supposedly can spin both ways.

    This urban legend has been applied to several video game systems. It's probably not true. It originated from the fact that some of the systems start from the outside of the disc and go in, as opposed to regular CDs and DVDs that start from the inside and go out. The PS2 and Xbox both have their boot sectors on the second layer of the DVD, which is typically written starting at the outside.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  153. If it's an X box it should run X! by mikeb · · Score: 1

    Has anyone managed to get a port of LTSP running on this thing? At the prices it would make an expensive but amusing X terminal and I'm sure the port of Linux won't be far behind ... and when they *really* have to slash the price it would save me having to cobble X terms together by dismantling old PCs, take out the hard drive, cut the fan lead in the PSU and so on.

    Just a thought :)

  154. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by rapid+prototype · · Score: 1

    well if there are only 2 good games, and you already have them... 2 extra games ARE pretty worthless.

    -rp

  155. Wheee... a real OS... Wheee.... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS."

    It's a console, not a PC. The last thing I want to see on my purely entertainment device is a "real" OS messing up the works. What did you have in mind...? LINUX !? Go buy a freakin Gateway or something if you want a real OS. Dude, yer gettin' a Dell. For cryin out loud. MAKE yer own for $300.

    I would like to see some of the other hacks for it though... I so desperatly want to change that 8gig HD into a 60gig so I can turn the thing into a .WMA base (I assume, since it is Microsoft, that it uses WMA and not MP3).

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  156. Just a notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When XBox was first released, they were selling it for $100 less than the parts alone are worth.

  157. This also was in ... by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
    MSNBC

    And thanks to the person who first mentioned Act of Gord, absolutely the funniest thing I've read in a long time. (I really like stories about stupid people.)

    --
    Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  158. Re:Whilst though try thy farts by flame in one's e by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just making this post to clue you in: if you were even half the troll you seem to think you are, you wouldn't be posting at -1, receiving only 1 reply to your comments, and jumping in to your own threads to keep them alive. You are definitely a case of a troll who's dumber than his biters.

  159. The place to report this: by theolein · · Score: 1
  160. Re:A Stupid Proposal ;) by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    *ahem*

    When the things sit on shelves unsold, they cost Microsoft still more.

    This is because not giving Microsoft any money to offset their costs, hurts them more than giving Microsoft money that doesn't completely offset their costs.

    But if you want to organize people to go out there on a large scale and give Microsoft money, why, you go right ahead there. I'm sure they'll find things to do with it! Maybe they'll use the money you give them to come up with a plan to really hurt the (GPL) software license I like best and use. After all, it is not okay with them that I should just mind my own business and write code without paying attention to them. If you give them money maybe they can develop and fund programs that FORCE me to deal with them, such as using Passport for US national ID.

    Okay, so I spoke too soon. When I said 'why you go right ahead there', cross that out and write 'are you fscking crazy?????' :P

  161. Drinking Fosters in Australia by theolein · · Score: 1

    or insinuating that Australians do is a worse insult than misquoting the population stats.

  162. Re:Racist japs by mikerich · · Score: 1
    Have you been to Japan? Japanese stores are filled with goods from elsewhere. The one thing that they have in common is that they appeal to the Japanese and that they work. XBox has failed in both fields.

    The Japanese launch line-up was not very inspiring, particularly compared to the stuff out on PS2 and Gamecube at the same time. The strongest title, HALO, isn't even out in Japan. XBox didn't have the all-important out-of-the-box DVD compatibility that boosted initial PS2 shipments. It simply wasn't an attractive purchase.

    The second problem is that there have been glitches. The Japanese are very unforgiving of such problems. MS cocked up when they denied there was a problem, then said there was a problem - but it didn't matter and so on. They could have learned all this from Intel's handling of the Pentium bug - but MS didn't.

    XBox needs Japanese content fast if it is to survive in that market. Hopefully Sega will do the job and other major coding houses will follow. But MS don't have much time to dissociate XBox from its problems.

    And yes, I've been to Japan and I have an XBox. It's a nice piece of kit, but the upcoming titles aren't the most inspiring out there. I might have to get a Gamecube to supplement my gaming intake. Best wishes, Mike.

  163. What ever happened... by randomErr · · Score: 1

    What ever happened to the XBOX hackers out there? I haven't heard much since they decoded the HD password.

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  164. Related to the GameCube release? by the_arrow · · Score: 1

    Anyone else noticed that the planned pricedrop is just one week before the GameCube release in Europe?

    --
    / The Arrow
    "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  165. Re:sell at loss? Nay, Listen Ye to the Almight Gor by timothy_m_smith · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have an article that does confirm that Sony is really making a profit on their console? I can't seem to find one.

  166. Re:If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or T by byran+lei · · Score: 1

    >I own an XBox, a PS2 and a Dreamcast. In every market some products
    >win, some fail - not everyone can win. The Xbox hasn't even been out a
    >year yet and everyone is expecting its demise - I would have to give
    >the product at least a year from now to more properly speculate what
    >its life will be like. Only time will tell.
    >
    Don't blame us for your stupidity in buying an Xbox. You were warned not to by the vast majority of the people who actually own and play console games. Only the PC fanboy gamers and some disgruntled Dreamcast fanboys ran around hyping the Xbox. Any console gamer would've told you flat out that the Xbox didn't stand a ghost of a chance of being accepted by people interested in console gaming basically because it didn't offer anything they wanted or were interested in. You have to laugh when the Xbox fanboys start ranting about the Xbox's supposed HDTV compatiblity. Here's a perfect example of the disconnect bettween PC gamer/XBox fanboys and the majority of people who buy and play console games. Your typical PC Gamer/XBox fanboy has wet dreams about HDTV. Your avergage Console gamer doesn't give a damn about HDTV.

  167. No Brainer... by SJ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can tell you exactly why MS has dropped the price of the XBox here in OZ.

    They are shit-scared of the Nintendo GameCube. Nintendo has been running a HUGE marketing campaign here in OZ. There about about 4 or 5 commercials for the GameCube every night on all three major TV stations. Not to mention Print and Radio. I have seen a total of ONE TV commercial for the XBox. The GC isn't even due til May 17th!.

    Guess how much the GC is going to be when it is released. Yep... AUS$399. Funny that.

    (This is also completely ignoring the fact that the XBox is so damn big, and the controller is just wrong.)

    To be perfectly honest, I would love to see Sony and Nintendo drop their prices to AUS$199. This would basically wipe the XBox off the face of the planet.

  168. All XBoxes probably do both PAL & NTSC by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    & Have dual input 110v/240v powersupplies, where you just need one of those travel-mate adaptors that just change the physical plug layout.

    Its simple economies of scale.

    Doing it that way is cheaper than doing different runs for different countries.

    I assume that on the back there'd be a tiny hole that you can fit a screwdriver through that lines up with a tiny sloted mini-switch for switching PAL to NTSC, etc. Or some other switching method.

    My brother's DVD player has a little hole that lines up with a sloted mini-switch on the circut board - you just stick a swrewdriver in & turn it different notches for different DVD regions, or all the way arround for the region free setting. His DVD player auto switches between PAL & NTSC (it has 3 settings - 'PAL', 'NTSC' & 'Auto')

    Of course I'm just assuming this, but from my experiance here in Oz, it seems all the contempory electrical gear seems to be world compatible.

    If the XBox was going to be custom made for different countries, you'd be looking at 5 or 6 different regions of DVDs, 2 different powersupplies (110v for Nth America, 240v for everywhere else, & about 8 different powerplug types) & PAL, SECAM & NTSC video outputs.

    Now just about every telly, VCR, DVD & TV card in Oz outputs all 3 types at the flick of the switch ('PAL', 'NTSC', 'Auto', I assume SECAM can work under either the 'PAL' or 'Auto' setting). I don't see why the XBox would be any different.

    While just about every DVD player in Oz can be set to change regions & 'region-free' (earlier ones), or change regions & 'multi-region' (later ones). Either via an internal microswitch that's oftern externally accesable (as ealier mentioned), or via a coded button sequence on the remote, or by the salesman working some magic on the guts at purchase time. I don't see why the XBox will be any different.

    Now with powersupplies, it gets more complicated. There's no reason the XBox can't have 110v/240v dual imputs, however there's the problem of about at least 8 different mainstream wall-plug formats across the world.

    The XBox could deal with this problem in 2 ways -

    - It could have a dual input 110v/240v built-in powersupply with a standard cassette-radio type 2 pin plug on it, or a 3 slot PC powersupply plug on it, & MS just supplying it with different powercables for the different countries.

    - The other option is for MS just to sell the XBoxes with external briquette type powersupplies that match whatever country its sold in.

    Which means using a Oz XBox in the US would hopefully be as simple as either changing the powercable or the briquette powersupply (whichever is applicable).

  169. Re:True by kubrick · · Score: 1

    Read the fine print on those phone deals. In this country, at least (Australia :) they're required to include minimum total cost of the plan -- and I refuse to believe that A$1200 (about US$600) doesn't cover the cost of the '$5' phone that they're selling you.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  170. Re:If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or T by mikerich · · Score: 1
    I own an XBox, a PS2 and a Dreamcast. In every market some products win, some fail - not everyone can win. The Xbox hasn't even been out a year yet and everyone is expecting its demise - I would have to give the product at least a year from now to more properly speculate what its life will be like. Only time will tell. The best we can hope for if the Xbox fails is that by some grace of god M$ gives regular users what they need to 'hack' the box. Fat chance.

    The scary fact is that this could be enough to kill the machine. Bad word of mouth and ignorance did for Dreamcast. Those of us who had one loved it, but the average person, if they had even heard of Dreamcast assumed that PS2 would be a much better console - simply by virtue of being later.

    Dreamcast was out on the streets while Sony issued blatantly false 'screenshots' from PS2 and hyped the emotion engine. When the games arrived, they looked much worse than Dreamcast.

    People want to see the games before buying - had Sega shown just how good Soul Calibur was on Dreamcast they would have sold machines left right and centre. Instead we got army barbers...

    Yet Microsoft is using the same advertising tactics as Sega. We have the 'Play More' campaign of a baby aging into middle age and then into the grave, the pubes on the bar of soap - but next to no game footage.

    Of course what XBox really needs is Chu Chu Rocket. Then all of its problems are solved.

    Best wishes, Mike.

  171. No, no no... by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1
    no, he's trying to say that MS wants to be like Apple, only more crappy.

    --ducks-- ;-)

  172. Hmm... MP3 player anyone? by wackybrit · · Score: 1

    Cheap Xboxes are good, but the games are still mega expensive (about £42 each in the UK, AFAIR).. however, doesn't the Xbox have some sort of leet mp3 player built in?

    It's cheaper than the iPod, and I heard you can put CDs of mp3s in, and it'll copy them to its hard drive.

    The Xbox is nowhere near the size of the iPod, but for the amount of cool things it can do, it might become a useful toy in the future.. kinda like the Dreamcast.

  173. wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder, does the 12 year old parent poster even know why no one is responding too him?

  174. The parent is not a troll! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    The parent article is not a troll!

    But seeing the level if criticle thinking skills demonstrated in yesterday's Voodoo Scince articel, I'm not at all surprised the mods have declaired the parent a troll.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:The parent is not a troll! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent IS a troll, he's constantly trolling on slashdot, has been for a while now. Check out his past comments through his user info, or read his journal.

  175. Re:If the XBox fails, it fails - its not a PC or T by heideggier · · Score: 1
    1.) The idea that the Microsft would turn the Xbox into a PC? Do you know how hard they have worked to make sure people _DONT_ perceive the Xbox as a PC? Not only would this piss off hardware vendors but it would land them in legal trouble instantly. I don't care what arguement you may have - you will _never_ see the XBox performing as a PC."

    Yeah I agree that all the anti M$ talk on slashdot is getting boring, mostly because it seems to take the line that even if they fail they still win, ie yeah the XBOX is a failure but they are still getting into the lounge room etc etc.

    But seriously, if M$ pissed off there OEM's who the hell are they going to go to?. M$ have a Monopoly there is no alternative. At least in terms of a consumer OS, unless apple ports OSX to intel, which ain't going to happen. It is true that you could argue that linux is an alternative, but then what do you say to person X who just whats to run Office?. The only way that would happen is if they all did it at the same time, something equally unlikely, and for joe public that experience would just be painful.

    If M$ made an OEM contract that every maker had to kiss bill gates on the arse, Then they would have to do it, in fact the standard OEM agreement isn't much further from that deal.

    As for landing them in legal trouble, the government alreadly tryed to split the company and M$ more-or-less ignored that decision and just brought themselves out on appeal, could another lawsuit really scare them? even an American lawsuit.

    Having the XBOX as a windows box is somthing that would save the thing overnight, and is probally be what ever the sequal to it will be, say the homestation. M$ wouldn't even have to do the marjority of the work themselves, just a few leaks to some hardware hacker groups, out comes a windows mod, and five minutes later the XBOX is breaking all sales records again, mostly because people are just buying a cheap pc for the living room (which is what the fsching thing should have been in the first place). It is true, that they would take a hit on licensing fees for the games, but then, could things get much worst then they are now? hell just sell the thing with a games bundle (like they did when the thing was launched) and all your bases are covered.

    I agree with you on your other points, I just have a problem when you say that M$ would _never_ try to turn the XBOX into a pc, because, as far as Im concerned, it is the only hope in hell that they have any chance of selling it.

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  176. xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by egomaniac · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing I find interesting is that I've repeatedly heard the argument that Microsoft can just throw money at XBox until it succeeds. The whole first-iteration-sucks but the third-one-will-be-good thing Microsoft is famous for.

    I don't buy it.

    The XBox looks likely to fail. It's getting its ass whipped everywhere but America, and even here the GameCube has started to outsell it despite no strong releases on the GameCube side. When Resident Evil, Zelda, Mario, Metroid, Eternal Darkness, and Star Fox Adventures hit the GameCube (supposedly all this year), Microsoft will need to have some damned strong support on their side to survive just in North America. And, barring some big surprises being revealed at E3, it doesn't look like they have too many great games coming, at least not that will stand up to Zelda and Mario. In any case, no matter how they do here, I think it's very likely that Japan, Europe, and Australia are lost causes.

    Suppose they do fail utterly -- they have to discontinue the XBox because people aren't buying it. Now, this is Microsoft, so of course they go back to the drawing board and release the even-more-powerful XBox 2. Twice as powerful as the Playstation 3, say, and a bit cheaper. Sounds great, right? Microsoft can just keep shoveling these things into the market until one of them sticks, the same way they've done with everything else.

    Well, no. Firstly, Microsoft's first-party games won't support the XBox 2 by itself. Nintendo is the only game company in the world that can pull that trick off. So the XBox 2 will need third-party support in order to have any games at all, and without games nobody will buy the system, no matter how powerful it is.

    Even after the XBox failure, many PC game companies might be willing to port their stuff to the XBox 2 for a quick buck. But can you imagine *anybody* developing exclusive software for the XBox 2, after the complete and utter failure of the XBox? Well, it's not impossible, but the XBox 2 would have to have a lot going for it in order to attract any third-party game companies. The Japanese third-parties, in particular, would be unlikely to touch the thing after the obvious failure of the first. They're leery enough dealing with the first one, and only tremendous work on Microsoft's part got any Japanese support at all.

    I'm well aware that Microsoft has deep pockets and can afford to buy game companies outright in order to force them to develop for the XBox 2 -- but that's not the point. They've already bought Bungie, and shovelled money at others, and it doesn't seem to be making a hell of a lot of difference. They need to fix the problem *now*, or it will be far, far more expensive to try to salvage the XBox 2. Microsoft isn't stupid -- they are perfectly well aware that unless they succeed now, it will be *really* expensive to try to make a comeback.

    In my view, if the XBox fails, it's all over for Microsoft's game console business. It will be really tough to buy back consumer and third-party confidence after the fiasco that looks to be shaping up.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    1. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      I think your absolutely wrong. The xbox has only been out for 5 months and your already declaring it dead? Remember Xbox has sold a good 1.7 - 2.0 million consoles in the US. Not to mention every week I see them selling a bit more then the cube. The European release was less then stellar but with the new price cut were sure to see much strong sales. Also why buy a gamecube if you can buy a Xbox for 50 euros more? And dont say you have to buy the dvd remote because on the gamecube your going to have to buy a memory card which is the same price as a dvd remote. Due to the xbox hard drive you dont have to there.

      I'm glad if you think the cube's games are going to boost the sales of the GC. If you like playing little kiddie games thats great. I'll stick with my Halo, Wreckless, Max payne for now. Also sorry to burst your bubble. Xbox E3 lineup will be awesome. Im sure they'll be some suprises and by this Christmas were sure to see some awesome Games. BC, Project EGO, PSO just to name a few. Not to mention all the online games that will come out with the XBOX online launch. Hmm.. What online plans do GC have?? Oh yeah none.
      ALso Morrowind will be out in May. BUffy will be out in june so we'll have quite a few games to keep us going during this slow release time of the year.

      As for your argument that the first party games cant support the whole cosole I agree with you there. However I dont think you understand that XBOX does have very good 3rd party support. Konami is going to release MGSX, SOE, GTA3 all for the xbox. Not to mention Capcom/EA/SEGA/NAMCO/TECMO and many more have all released games for the xbox. Sorry the tired old argument that the xbox is only a pc computer in a black box is wrong. ITs a game console with very good 3rd party support.

      The xbox price cut is a good thing. You can spin it all you want saying that it spells MS doom but you would be wrong. Its simple economics. By decreasing the price demand goes up. Yes MS is losing money on it however they can make up the price on it with future sales of games and accessories. I dont see anything wrong with that model. I believe PS2 did the same thing.

      Before you make you doom and gloom predictions and start talking about xbox 2 please do a little research. Just pulling out of your ass all these prediction about the xbox 2 is pretty weak. Go back to your GC fanboy message boards. I think thats where you belong.

      Bravo

    2. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by egomaniac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ummmm ... okay.

      The XBox is getting its ass kicked in worldwide sales. Even in North America it is being outsold by the GameCube (although the GC is still behind in terms of total NA sales).

      If you like playing little kiddie games thats great. I'll stick with my Halo, Wreckless, Max payne for now. Also sorry to burst your bubble.

      Well, I'm glad you enjoy those games. Good for you. I happen to enjoy Mario and Zelda, and I'm a married adult -- I don't think that makes me "kiddie". For the record, I'm also getting Resident Evil and Eternal Darkness, both of which are very bloody and horrific.

      Xbox E3 lineup will be awesome.

      Glad you think so -- you've made quite an investment in the XBox, and I hope you get games you enjoy for it.

      However, names like "Mario", "Zelda" and "Metroid" are important to a lot of people. Nintendo is showing all of their best franchises at E3 this year, and I very much doubt that any journalists will see Microsoft or Sony as having a better showing this year. We'll see in a little over a month, though -- feel free to scream "I TOLD YOU SO!" if a significant number of journalists (as supposedly objective parties) think MS trounced the competition at E3. I'm not going to hold my breath, though.

      However I dont think you understand that XBOX does have very good 3rd party support.

      And I don't think you were listening to me. I didn't say the XBox has lousy third-party support now -- I was referring to a hypothetical situation in which the XBox has failed. Obviously, at that point, all third parties are out the window, and the XBox 2 would have to start rebuilding support.

      Picture, if you will, how Sega would have fared had they tried to introduce the Dreamcast 2. The situation facing the XBox 2 will be the same, if the XBox flops.

      The xbox price cut is a good thing.

      I don't recall saying otherwise.

      Before you make you doom and gloom predictions and start talking about xbox 2 please do a little
      research. Just pulling out of your ass all these prediction about the xbox 2 is pretty weak


      I was speaking hypothetically. IF the XBox fails, there will be no XBox 2 -- at least not a successful one. Yes, I also predicted that this situation is likely, but the main point of my post was the logical conclusion that an XBox failure all but forces an XBox 2 failure.

      Go back to your GC fanboy message boards. I think thats where you belong.

      Ooookay. I think we have an insecure college kid on our hands, folks.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    3. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      Ok.

      Even in North America it is being outsold by the GameCube

      Can you back that up with some sales figures somewhere? As far as I can tell NPD and other sites I've seen put the xbox and GC pretty much dead on. Even though the GC is priced a 100 dollars cheaper in the US.

      Well, I'm glad you enjoy those games. Good for you. I happen to enjoy Mario and Zelda, and I'm a married adult -- I don't think that makes me "kiddie". For the record, I'm also getting Resident Evil and Eternal Darkness, both of which are very bloody and horrific.

      Im glad you like your old Mario and Zelda franchises. Every year they have to make another sequel and every year its the same old Mario and the same old Zelda. Why not go with something new and exciting. And another thing who wants a 3 year old remake of RE? Hasnt this series been pushed to its limits? Dont tell me Mario and Zelda are not kiddy. I respect Shigeru Miyamoto a lot. However he is developing the games for a certain demographic. Same think with all the pokemon games and Smash brothers melee. There for kids and some for the whole family. Also I would bet you either Cellda (cell shaded zelda) Or Mario sunshine wont be out this year. Knowing Nintendo it will be pushed back into 2003.

      We'll see in a little over a month, though -- feel free to scream "I TOLD YOU SO!" if a significant number of journalists (as supposedly objective parties) think MS trounced the competition at E3. I'm not going to hold my breath, though

      I never said MS was going to trounce the competition. I was just remarking that the E3 lineup will be great. Pushing a lot of people that are on the fence to buy the box.

      And I don't think you were listening to me. I didn't say the XBox has lousy third-party support now -- I was referring to a hypothetical situation in which the XBox has failed. Obviously, at that point, all third parties are out the window, and the XBox 2 would have to start rebuilding support.

      And thats a huge hypothetical situation. Suggesting an xbox 2 when the Xbox has only been out 5 months is just silly. Plus who determines if MS is a failure? Because they only sold 5 million consoles instead of 6 million consoles there first 6 months?

      I was speaking hypothetically. IF the XBox fails, there will be no XBox 2 -- at least not a successful one. Yes, I also predicted that this situation is likely, but the main point of my post was the logical conclusion that an XBox failure all but forces an XBox 2 failure.

      And at the same time acting as a jury judge and executioner to the current xbox without backing up any of your hypothetical claims. THat would be called FUD.

      Ooookay. I think we have an insecure college kid on our hands, folks.

      And I think we have a insecure married Gamecube fanboy here.

      Bravo

    4. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by fondue · · Score: 1

      Woo, a slagging match where the Xbox-zealot describes Nintendo games as 'kiddie'. Which immediately rules out him having played or appreciated any of them. (As for the 'same old Mario' comment- care to name another game franchise that spearheaded as significant a technological leap as Mario World --> Mario 64? Hmm? Thought not.)

      Xbox is tanking outside of North America. Even though this in itself is no judgement on the quality of the machine's games (as we all know the Dreamcast had a stellar library but sold poorly), sadly the Xbox doesn't have the games to pull it through. I see magazines making a great deal of noise about Xbox titles that would hardly be a big deal if released during the previous console generation. The price cuts just add to the atmosphere of desperation, MS making a last ditch effort to keep the machine from oblivion.

      Looks like you backed the wrong horse, unless you like sports franchises. And thousands of... less discerning... gamers do. Don't be ashamed.

      --

      Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    5. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      I respect Shigeru Miyamoto a lot. However he is developing the games for a certain demographic.

      Yeah. That demographic is called "people." The demographic you seem to belong to is a subset "people" called "people who are too insecure to try a game that might make them look less manly."

      Once again, I will pull out the Penny Arcade link that summarizes this so well.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    6. Re:xbox failure = microsoft gaming dead by Bravadaz77 · · Score: 1

      Supporting Microsoft on Slashdot is likely walking threw Afganistan while waving an American flag. Just not a good thing to do.

      But seriosly the Mario series was revolutionary when it first came out. However I think its more evolutionary now. Its the same game that comes out over and over and over again. As for another series that "spearheaded as a siginificant technological leap" what about FF? I think everyone was blown out of the way when FF7 came out for the PSX. It was amazing. What about HALO? It redefined the FPS genere on consoles and won numerous awards.

      You can spin it all you want. Im going to say it again. Price cuts are good. Its not a last ditch effort for MS. Remember PSX price cuts and N64 pricecuts? It didnt spell doom for either company. N64 pricecut was in the first two months. The European xbox was over-priced. NOw its stealing the thunder of the Cubes launch on May 17th. I bet you a lot of those cube pre-orders will think twice now since the xbox price cut. Once again price goes down sales go up. Simple economics.

      Xbox will succeed and dont be suprised that xbox sales in Europe will rise significantly.

      Bravo

  177. Try owning one first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It seems to me that most of these comments are coming from people that don't even own an X-Box.

    Fact:

    Xbox has superior graphics
    Xbox has just as many good launch titles as PS2 did. PS2 had SSX and not much else. Xbox has Halo.

    Everyone just jumps to hate MS for everything they do. I'm sure that if MS decided to give $1B to /. and sourceforge tomorrow, no strings attached, that most everyone here would be in an uproar. It's a damn shame that no one can see the bigger picture here. I'm happy that a US company has the edge over the others. The strength of MS is a piece of what makes the US a superpower. It's funny, the death of the US is going to be the fact that we are slowly cutting our legs out from under us. Senator Disney and all this MS hate make me sick. Wake up kids, if it keeps up, China will rule the world.

    1. Re:Try owning one first by fondue · · Score: 1
      "Fact:


      Xbox has superior graphics
      Xbox has just as many good launch titles as PS2 did. PS2 had SSX and not much else. Xbox has Halo."


      Cute, you think people buy consoles for the graphics. Maybe in the US... which would explain why it's the only country where the Xbox isn't considered a joke.


      The PS2's launch games are immaterial to the argument- we don't all go back to the starting line just because MS is still tying its shoelaces.

      It's laughable that Halo is considered to be a 'killer app'- a poorly-implemented FPS that looks and plays worse than nearly anything in the genre released on the PC in the last two years, put together by a third-rate developer desperate enough to sell out to MS. Roll on Metroid Prime.

      The rest of the world isn't fooled by marketing and fancy graphics- they can see that the Xbox is the most expensive console, that offers the least in the way of games and functionality. Big whoop, it has net hardware that you can't use yet, and a HDD that no game utilises. It's already dead in Japan, and where the (good, not Acclaim/EA) developers go, the gaming public will follow. This means Gamecube (outselling Xbox by 5 to 1 or more in Japan, probably will in EU too) and PS2 (already sold several tens of millions).

      Enjoy playing your (Hungarian built) American console, cultural imperialist dummy.

      --

      Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

    2. Re:Try owning one first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fact:

      XBox is a PC
      I have a PC, which I can upgrade...

      Fact:

      Xbox has crappy games.

      Fact:

      Ps/2 has rhad games.

      Fact:

      MS is evil - people should hate them.

      Fact:

      MS will fall - and the US will keep going just fine - don't you worry about that.

      Fact:

      China will take over the world - it has already begun... Atleast they're nice and believe in 'things' other than making more and more money - whilst fsckin' over anyone in their way.

  178. 'Real OS'? by Versalis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With a fast CPU, wizzy graphics card, ethernet, DVD and TV out, it would be a handy thing in the living room if it ran a real OS.

    I've read many allusions to this all over the web and I have one question: What the h3ll are you talking about?

    It's a GAME CONSOLE! Here's what you do with it: 1) plug it in, 2) turn it on, 3) insert a game disk and 4) start playing.

    Exactly what is it that you want to do with this thing that requires a 'real OS'? If your answer goes beyond steps 1 through 4 above then I think you're a bit confused; you don't want a game console, you want something else entirely. It's called a computer.
  179. Re:A Stupid Proposal ;) by KillerKane · · Score: 1

    You've got a point, but if they don't sell, they won't keep making them. Then they stop losing money. I'm looking far a way to steadily drain cash out of the bastards indefinitely.

    As a friend of mine used to say, "In the long run, it's the long run that counts."

    Anyway, I was kind of kidding, pal. But "kidding on the square", as my dear old mom would put it.

    --
    There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
  180. PS1 outselling Xbox? by DapperDan · · Score: 1
    Might I point out a small flaw in your theory?

    Week 4/8-4/14, Japan Hardware Sales

    * PS1: 3,000 units (total this year: 74,000)

    * Xbox: 1,800 units (total this year: 169,000)

    Thats not what I would call outselling.

    1. Re:PS1 outselling Xbox? by Gonarat · · Score: 1

      PS1 may not be outselling Xbox in total units sold this year, but remember PS1 is an older box (the PS2 is its successor), so the fact that it has sold 74K units this year is gravy for Sony. Sony has also done a good job in keeping PS1 a viable platform (the LCD add on screen, making PS2s able to play PS1 games). The weekly numbers show that PS1 can outsell X-BOX (at least for a week), not bad for an older platform.


      --
      Beware of Sleestak
    2. Re:PS1 outselling Xbox? by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2

      I said the PS1 is outselling the XBox, not that the PS1 has outsold the XBox, although that is also true depending on the timeframe; the statement you are making is that since the beginning of 2002, more XBoxes than PS1s have been sold, which has a very different meaning. The rate at which PS1s are being sold in Japan right now is much higher than the rate at which XBoxes are (is refers to the present tense).

      --
      "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  181. open source the box by CaptTrips · · Score: 0

    You know if Microsoft released a disc that contained the SDK, toolkits and more tons of people would buy the Xbox for the simple fact that it'll be more than just a gaming machine, and more than a pc. With the SDK in the hands of the development community, we would start to see a LOT of really cool stuff. Stuff that doesn't even necessarily have to be "games". The XBOX, unlike any other console, HAS a hard drive, and a big hard drive too boot (pun intended). I really think Microsoft should leverage this to their advantage. And leverage it soon before their console dies.

    And Zarathustra.fi has a great point about Microsoft's game pricing. Some games like Halo, Max Payne and Madden 2002, I would say are worth $50. But games like Arctic Thunder, Azurik: Rise of Perathia, Blood Wake, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Fuzion Frenzy, LOONS -- The Fight For Fame, Oddworld: Munch's Oddysee, Shrek, TransWorld Surf, Unreal Championship and Whacked are definitely a few titles that are worth $40 and under.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  182. Everything's integrated. by z2000 · · Score: 1
    I opened my Xbox to put a UATA cable on the hard drive and I was quite surprized to see how few processors were on the motherboard. There were only 4 or 5 in total. You have the Celeron, the video chipset (which also handles the sound), the I/O chipset (which handles the USB, disk I/O, and ethernet) and a Dolby Digital encoder. Apart from the memory, that was about it.

    With the high level of integration here, I honestly can't see them losing too much on each box. I take the word that they cost $425 a piece to build with an enormous gain of salt. At $299, if they're selling at a loss it isn't much of one. The only big ticket component in the box is the DVD-ROM drive.

  183. It's all about the monopoly by L-Train8 · · Score: 2

    ...MS knows it's gonna take heavy losses to get the market penetration required to start making serious money on the software.

    It is amazing to me how much money Microsoft is bleeding out with the XBox. It's an insane strategy if making money off game software royalties is their goal. However, I don't think that they ever intend for XBox to turn a profit, at least in this generation. Rather, they are protecting their monopoly.

    Microsoft has the monopoly on the PC OS. But what if, 5 or 10 years from now, nobody used a PC? What if everyone used a TV set-top appliance that played games and DVD's, was a PVR, surfed the web as an internet appliance, wrote letters and resumes and balanced the checkbook. This theoretical "convergence box" is the direction that many pundits see the industry heading. So if, in the future, everyone uses this box instead of a PC, Microsoft would be out of business.

    Unless that box had a Microsoft logo on it instead of a Sony one. I think that this is the real reason Microsoft got into the console business, and the reason they are willing to lose so much money. They want to protect the monopoly, plain and simple. If they lose a billion dollars on X-Box over 4 years, but keep the industry stranglehold that earns them tens of billions of dollars annually, then it was money well lost.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  184. Grr by strombrg · · Score: 1


    Buying jewelry from the nazis was "a good buy" too, but it certainly wasn't a good idea.

    I don't care how much they have to reduce the price of their box - you should vote with your dollars for a company that plays well with others.

  185. If you lower the price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lower the price on a piece of crap, you just end up with a cheaper turd.

  186. X-Box a console? Not by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    X-Box is a p3 733 with Nvidia GPU and special (eh, tweaked firmware etc) hardware.

    That is NOT a console IMHO. We speak about 128bit Sony PS/2 in consoles.

    However, MS would -of course- tweak DirectX for that "console". Also its normal for them.

    But its NOT a console, the "gaming" console I understand is a much more advanced machine with the features we don't see/need on PC's.

    Like a 128 bit processing unit (whether its a gpu or cpu, I don't know)...

    So, X-Box... People dreaming of 2Ghz P4's running on RDRAM's won't give a sh*t to it. Especially if "gaming" that they understand is "counter strike". Counter Strike uses Modified Quake II engine of half life... Eh,that "console" has OpenGL?

  187. Harvey Norman by TommyBear · · Score: 1

    Harvey Norman in Australia are refusing to stock the XBox as Microsoft asked them to give the XBox preference over the PS2.

    Harvey Norman instead stocked more PS2 combo entertainment packs... suck on that M$

  188. yes, you can. by denshi · · Score: 2
    Let's look again, shall we?
    Week 4/8-4/14, Japan Hardware Sales

    * PS1: 3,000 units (total this year: 74,000)

    * Xbox: 1,800 units (total this year: 169,000)

    Okay, on the one hand, you have a console that was just launched, has $500 million in advertising backing it up, should be in a high-sales-yet-growing area of the sales curve, and people buy it knowing it has a future.

    On the other hand, the other console was released a hair over 6 years ago, has no advertising, is essentially overpriced considering the 100 million! previous sales are heading to the used console market, is way past the tapered end of the sales curve, and people are buying it knowing that it has no future and may in fact be best suited for use as a lawn ornament.

    With that in mind, I would say, YES for the love of bug-fuck 3000 for an end-of-life box is more than 1800 for a new, hyped, growing box. What, you're complaining about the totals? Bah. Look at the sales curves: normally, you see the opening week spike, sales fall to a fraction (but still sizeable) for the next month or two as the early adopters get their gear; as they taper off everyone else gets around to buying. Slowly the sales figures grow and level off at 1/4 to 1/3 of the launch, where they stay for another 3 years or so. The Xbox curve: opening week spike, gradual fall, complete plummet following broken hardware snafu; their curve is now below a relic and still falling. And for a finale, there is little to no historical precedent to show that a company can pull out of a dive like that.

    ciao, Xbox. See you in 5 years.

    Thats not what I would call outselling.
    That's what we would call 'a freakish divergence of plotted sales figures'.
  189. I think that the reasion the XBOX is failing... by heideggier · · Score: 1
    In Australia is that they simply screwed the pooch in marketing the thing. They conducted the most annoying advertising campaign I have ever seen personally (living outside of san fan admittedly)

    To sum up...

    They started running ads for the thing in september when the thing wasn't going to be released in another four months (late march), why would you bother to advertise something which wasn't going to be released until well into to next year?

    They started a viral marketing campaign, which basically means they paid some dudes to spray paint green X's everywhere, pissing a lot of people off. To just pay people to vandalise property doesn't make you cool

    They spammed local universities with adverts for the thing, putting ads on community boards for months (some of which still haven't been taken down). Like your average college student in Australia (univerisity in this country is publically funded) has the money to buy the thing in the first place and would just because they covered up the play lists and for the local pub. IE, they posted XBOX ads over the enrollment timetables at my local university you can imagine how that went down.

    Instead of running locally produced ads on the tube they just ported American advertisments. Which had the effect of alienating people in this country, and there still running the fscking things, I sware if I see that ad for HALO again I'm going to kick in my TV

    In short,, the advertising campaign in this country was just crap, in fact it had the effect of pissing a lot of people off, who would have brought the thing. It was simply too much for too long, too badly done. To illustrate, my 56 year old man who knows nothing about computers even went on at me for hours about how he hating seeing ads for the thing everywhere, since being a nerd I was somehow responsible.

    IMHO, If you what to advertise a product the best way to do it is to have a campaign starting a week before the local launch then give the punters a rest before starting to advertise the games, like nintendo are doing.

    M$'s attempts at marketing in this country have been really substandard to say the least, they clearly give the impression that M$ does not give a flying frill about this country and consquently no one here could care less about their console, I imagine that the same holds true for other countries expaining it's poor showing there.

    The best example would be that ad for windows XP with all those people flying around, M$ run the same ad here completely ignoring that the exact same concept had been used by the telephone company One.tel who had recentally gone broke in this country leaving a lot of Australian stock brokers out of pocket. Clearly, M$ couldn't care less about there public image anywhere out side of North America.

    --
    Pianist : Some jerk whos taught themselves how to type in rhythm
  190. Re:Losing 100$ for console. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suposedly MS was losing 100$ bucks for console when the console was priced at 400.

    Sorry I don't believe, hey guys we are talking of a Pentium 733 with 64Mb. Does it cost 500$?. Yeah sure, XBox factory price is around 1000$ and the Pope is a woman.

    Now perhaps they are losing this amount.

  191. Can you say DirectX... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    It was a huge steaming pile of crap for several releases, but they kept throwing money at programmers, buying up competitors, and generally forcing it in places it did not fit. Well it is the de-facto standard now and quite nice. Whether this was the strategy M$ intended or not, it is the road they generally take. Give them another year for game developers to catch on and I see a real competion. That said I am NOT buying a console, that can't interface into my PC system, period.

    As to you "PC gamers"...My PC system BLOWS away any console system for overall gaming experience, no contest, plus it has the added value of being useful for a mryiad of other tasks, and UPGRADEABLE to boot :)

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    1. Re:Can you say DirectX... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And just like Microsoft, you need to keep throwing money at it to keep it that way...

  192. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NTSC TVs can't stomach PAL. I Tried it and the TV started hurling. Most PAL TVs handle NTSC fine though. Besides, unless the XBox has a switching power supply, you couldn't do sh*t with it in the US, since PAL uses 220V @ 50Hz.

  193. Re:You PC gamers were... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PS2's backwards compatibility alone made it the better buy, I could play all my old PS One games on better platform and I still buy PS One games because I can pick them up for about $15 a pop, PS2 had a larger game selection (not counting the near 1000 PS One games) a more comfortable game controller, and was released with DVD capability around the same time DVD was just hitting main stream. Next gen game consoles may seem expensive but not when you subtract the cost of a DVD player. Not to mention that Sony has already proven itself in the industry. The Xbox was released at around 400+ for the console and only about 10 games all priced near $60 each. Thats $1000 for the box and 10 games after the PS2 had already been released on the market months earlier. Some may have thought the Xbox would have given the PS2 a run for its money, I wasn't one of them.

  194. Real OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does run a real OS. I see it blue screened nearly every time I see one in the store.

    ac

  195. I threw out my xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, I have traded my XBox for a PS2. Not because I didn't liked the hardware. I mean, the graphics are amazing on the Xbox compared to the PS2, but I got so fucking frustrated one evening playing with the BIIIIGGGG ms controller (hands burning, aching...) that I threw out the fucking thing. Now I have a PS2, graphics are not that bad, I have great games to play with, I have a controller half the size of the ms one, plus I was able to hook my PC Logitech Wingman Force Wheel to it and it worked perfectly with GranTourismo. The games for the xbox are just boring except Amped and beleive me, I bought every game that came out for the xbox so far. What i waste of money, I know but you never learn without hurting yourself the first time. We will never teach japanese how to make a game console, never.

  196. 21M these days!!! by donscarletti · · Score: 1

    Five million!!!

    There are more then that in sydney alone.

    I know that even 21 million is a fairly puny population, but five million. That's pathetic. maybe your talking about New Zealand?

    Australia kicks Europes arse, but we are united in one respect. Neither of us likes those unstable, fuzzy pieces of potentially monopolistic sh** X-boxes, and in that respect I am proud of both our continants. And Japan, they hate them too

    The difference between holding an X-Box and a play-station controller is the difference between picking up a cinder block and caressing the sencual curves of a beautiful woman

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  197. You will pay for it one way or another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MS was already losing $100 per XBOX sold. Yet *in spite of this*, they're still raking in $1,000,000,000 profit a month. Do you think Bill Gates put up the $100 loss out of his pocket? No, it gets paid for directly by sales of Windows and Office. So when you buy Office or Windows, you are *directly* paying for some kids XBOX, somewhere.

    "Ha", I hear you say, "I pirate Windows, so thats not me". Well, consider this - your *work* still has to buy hundreds of licenses for all the Microsoft software. That money also has to come from somewhere, since your company also, like Microsoft, can't create money out of thin air. So your company's profits gets eaten into - or, to put it simply, your Christmas bonus this year will be lower than it might have been, and/or your salary is lower than it *could* have been if your boss didn't have to go around subsidizing a bunch of XBOX's (and MS's 40% margins).

    When will people learn that companies and governments can't create things out of thin air? Internet Explorer used to be widely touted because it was "free" - I didn't see Microsoft losing money, did you? So obviously it wasn't free - it just means the cost gets shifted onto some other product line, i.e. Windows.

  198. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by vortexau · · Score: 1

    As ppl have commented, there are several problems:

    - Most CD or DVD games for games systems are Region Encoded.

    - PAL equipment uses the PAL system, and NTSC systems use the NTSC standard.

    - SOME (repeat SOME) PAL systems can decode NTSC and direct a 'type of Standards conversion' to the display circuits.

    - I don't know if ANY NTSC systems have this kind of capability, but I doubt it exists outside of TV and Cable stations.

    - MULTI-Standards TVs and VCRs exist - what do you think is used on yachts?

    - MULTI-Standard Systems have PS' switchable from 110v to 250v, 60Hz to 50Hz. Heck, they probally do 12vdc and 24vdc too!

    ---------

    AU$1.00 currently equal to about US$0.55

    ---------

    Amiga owners are familiar with these issues as the machines handle NTSC and PAL as standard. We had MANY NTSC games on PAL systems in the early years. These games displayed on the TOP 5/6 of the screen in a squashed format.

    NTSC owners playing PAL games missed out on the LOWER 1/6 of the display - it was below the margin of the screen and often had the Scoring infomation.

    Importing Amigas between 110v 60Hz and 240v 50Hz countries simply requires acquiring the correct PS, or converting it!
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  199. take a pill by Crag · · Score: 1

    I was finishing the obvious South Park referencee.

  200. The real money by stdPikachu · · Score: 1

    Surely, the real profit margins of the Xbox are going to come with the DSL-only networking options? How much do you bet that once (if?) the online killer apps are released then users will be poleaxed with a whopping subscription fee? Getting the box into your home is one thing; getting you to get it chained to the phone socket is quite another, and believe me people will do it. Don't underestimate the Xbox, it still has the potential to become a market leader if M$ is prepared to make a long term investment and slash the price before they start raking it in.

    --
    They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction.
  201. Re:A Stupid Proposal ;) by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Well, I sympathise with your desire. But smarten up :)

    Look- Microsoft Office, Word etc. have long been copied. Really large people have 'stolen' these products, not EVEN paying Microsoft money for them, much less paying hundreds of dollars. So, since Microsoft clearly lost money on all those Office copyings, and weren't even paid AT ALL, clearly it's done them loads of damage, and that is why Word and Office never became successful products and we have the thriving office-software competitive market we have tod..

    doh!

    Get it?

  202. Re:A Stupid Proposal ;) by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Hee- I suppose some really large people HAVE 'stolen' Office, but of course what I meant to write was 'really large NUMBERS of people' ;)

    Anyhow, see the point? Let's not be doing this with game consoles. Consoles are about having fun, and nothing about Microsoft is fun. Unless you're into BDSM, I suppose :)

  203. GC PRICEDROP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nintendo's undercut microsofts efforts already, A$329 for aussies and 199euro for europe, say goodnight xbox.

    http://www.planetgamecube.com/news.cfm?action=it em &id=2907

  204. One more self-responce... by Xenex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Nintendo responded by dropping the GameCube's launch price to $AU329.

    Hurrah, etc.

  205. Re:Losing 100$ for console. Ha! by BlackGriffen · · Score: 1

    "Sorry I don't believe, hey guys we are talking of a Pentium 733 with 64Mb. Does it cost 500$?."

    No, but the Nvida GF3+ (it's a little more than a GF3) with the chipset, plus the hard drive, plus breakage (which is probably higher than other console makers due to the relative fragility of a hard drive), etc. all point to a unit cost of somewhere around $400 at the beginning of the console's life. And a unit cost of $400 means that M$ would be losing more than $100 when selling it retail (remember, you need to consider the store's cut too) for $300.
    They may have gotten costs down further since then, but I doubt that they have it below $300 (still selling at a loss, mind you).

    BlackGriffen

  206. Re:I wonder if Australia XBox is compatible with U by Mandelbrute · · Score: 2
    Maybe it will - they HDTV kit they shipped to Australia supports the wrong standard for Australia, so it may be worth looking into if you have a HDTV, 240 volts AC and a pile of PAL format X-box games. So may employees, so much money - you would think that they could get someone to look up which standard is used in the country that they are shipping the boxes to!

    Also, a lot of Japanese made TV's support a multitude of TV formats, including both NTSC and PAL. So if the manual says that your TV supports PAL-B/G (as well as the local format) it would work. I suspect that PAL capable TVs would be more expensive in NTSC countries, since NTSC requires less hardware. Feeding 240V into the X-box may be a pain, if you don't already have a transformer that will do this you will end up spending more than you would save. If the region coding of the games is true then that would suck mightily - I suspect that the only region problem would be PAL games vs NTSC games.

    As for importing a TV from Australia, it would be cheaper to get one from a country where there actually make the things.

  207. Parent is goatse.cx link.... by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2

    I find the lameness filter annoying.