Slashdot Mirror


Customers Rate PC Vendors' Tech Support

VorfeedTech writes "News.com has a story on consumers' satisfaction with tech support. The article goes on to mention ConsumerReports' survey results comparing a few of the major PC vendors. Apple rated the best for tech support. I guess this is where they think different (TM)."

242 comments

  1. Reverse would be fun... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    Getting Tech Support to rate the customers. Which company has the stupidest clients, and is there a relationship between quality of service and the intelligence of the people receiving it.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  2. A Universal Truth... by RomSteady · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Those in the know about any subject almost always think those who are not in the know are complete idiots.

    When you are supporting something, you become a genre expert, and as such, have a domain of knowledge about the product that few outside of tech support could hope to attain.

    Besides, when you've worked tech support, you only remember the bad calls, never the good ones.

    --
    RomSteady - I came, I saw, I tested. GamerTag: RomSteady / http://www.romsteady.net
    1. Re:A Universal Truth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Besides, when you've worked tech support, you only remember the bad calls, never the good ones


      I strongly agree with this point. I have also noticed that the best customer service is provided by those who remember that each customer is an individual. Once a customer service rep starts referring to the "customer" or "public" as a group instead of individuals, service level falls off. The rep forgets that he/she hears the same problems over and over but the customer is experiencing the problem for the first time.

    2. Re:A Universal Truth... by hkmwbz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem isn't one-sided. The techs know all the problems, etc., but many people are outright obnoxious when contacting support, even yelling about things which are their own fault. Most techs handle this quite well, but it obviously starts wearing on you after a while. If you only knew how much better the tech support is if you are polite and pleasant. If anything, being a dick will lessen your chances of getting good tech support.

      Combine this with the fact that people are usually pissed off for the wrong reasons, and you can see they the techs are worn out and don't perform as well as they could if people actually had a brain.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    3. Re:A Universal Truth... by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      I aggree. Working with an ISP I constantly hear, "Are your servers down today?" Those are the first words out of 25% of customer's mouths when they call. And they're doing dumb stuff like not connecting to the internet before trying to send email. It's rude.

    4. Re:A Universal Truth... by danamania · · Score: 2

      Having worked tech support for 2 years, for phone-based support of pretty much anything computing-related in state schools, I have to say it gave me the usual "oh god you won't believe what people do" stories, but I always make sure I mention that I've seen some of the most incredible moments of inspiration from non-technical types. It's like you're there when someone first figures out something that you KNOW they'll use time and time again in the future - they just needed a little reassurance. It's nice.

      Most people were normal, about 5% were complete and utter morons who shouldn't be allowed near computing equipment as part of their job.

      Obsessed with a Quadra

  3. Dell buys adds => Dell gets press by capt.Hij · · Score: 4, Interesting
    It looks like Dell's satisfaction numbers are slipping, and the article gives many excuses as to why this might be. It is a little difficult to give this much credence when they've paid for the banners spanning across the top of the page. Not only that but they gave Apple a few passing comments even thought they were the only ones to improve their satisfaction numbers.

    I wonder if there is a connection there?

  4. Apple, Gateway by funkhauser · · Score: 2

    I've had mixed results with Gateway. When I got my PII 300 box way back when, we ordered it from Gateway. The components were pretty flakey: we had a hard drive, a modem, and a monitor all die. However, when we reported the problem, getting replacement components was not a hassle. I don't know how they are about that now, but at the time, they were quite nice. I haven't dealt with Apple's tech support, but their warranty package has kept me from buying their hardware. The base warranty is pretty skimpy, and the outrageously priced AppleCare plan is painfully restrictive about what it covers.

    1. Re:Apple, Gateway by phunhippy · · Score: 2

      The base warranty is pretty skimpy, and the outrageously priced AppleCare plan is painfully restrictive about what it covers

      how do you figure this out? Base warranty is for a year(still i believe) and covers labor and parts & you can take it to any apple dealer..
      the apple care plan is an extended warranty for however many years you want and is aslo a good deal when you factor the cost of the hardware vs life of the system and the fact it covers parts and labor..

      I used to work at a mac repair shop in the old days(5 years) and i think apple care is a great deal...

    2. Re:Apple, Gateway by funkhauser · · Score: 2
      Like I said, I've never dealt with Apple. All I know is that $250 or whatever for just an extended warranty is a little steep for a poor college student like me when the $1500 or so for an iBook is stretching it as it is.

    3. Re:Apple, Gateway by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      250$ for the extra 2 years of no-questions-asked tech support is exactly what you want if you're a college student. Do you really think your laptop is going to make it through college in one piece?

      As a comparison, try checking the prices of in-store maintenance contracts for the same hardware. You'll find Apple is more than reasonable.

      On the flip side, consider that any hardware repair at all after the first year will run you at least 350$ for parts and labor. You're foolish not the get the applecare warranty.

      Remember that apple systems have a longer lifetime than typical PC counterparts. You're going to be using that ibook for a long time to come, you might as well take care of it.

    4. Re:Apple, Gateway by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      But that's $250 for three years of additional, full coverage. The initial hit is steep, but it's really worth it if you're paranoid :)

    5. Re:Apple, Gateway by Cpl+Laque · · Score: 1

      My company uses apples to interface with our flow-cytometers. I am generally not an apple guy but we are still using quadras just fine.

    6. Re:Apple, Gateway by rbrunner · · Score: 1
      No, its 2 years of additional coverage, giving you three years from purchase, including the original warranty. Student price is $237

      Laptop warranties cost much more than desktop ones. An iMac costs $142.

      I figured it was a good deal for my PowerBook. So far I've gotten two replacement power supplies (the cords keep breaking) and some rubber feet under warranty. So I feel like I got my money's worth.

      I also added laptop coverage to my renters insurance, for $24 extra a year. That covers most of the things the warranty doesn't. (like theft, or dropping the computer)

    7. Re:Apple, Gateway by Mikey-San · · Score: 0

      AppleCare also extends the phone support to three years.

      If you ask me, for many users, that's almost worth the cost of the coverage plan.

      Often, when I recommend AppleCare to people, they say, "Well, I had $OLDER_MAC for $LENGTH_OF_TIME and never had a problem at all!"

      That's all well and dandy, but perhaps you were lucky. Perhaps not. Apple sells more computers now than they did back in the days of the Quadra 950 and IIfx, and that means they have to manufacture their hardware differently, and on a much larger scale.

      The way of the world and general logic dictate that in order to meet a demand as large as major hardware vendors have to meet these days, mass-manufacturing and third-party contracting usually have to be implemented in some fashion.

      So you have two factors at work here:

      More units in the field + differences in manufacturing to meet demands = AppleCare isn't such a bad idea after all.

      It's not that they make bad or worse products, it's that there are a whole lot more products out there to break and be broken. Law of large numbers, etc. And yeah, a Mac user will keep his or her Mac longer, and keep it in use longer, than the typical PC counterpart. More reason to invest more into the machine, I say.

      Sorry to stray there, from your post, but hey, it's a forum. :-)

      -/-
      Mikey-San

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    8. Re:Apple, Gateway by pmz · · Score: 2

      You're foolish not the get the applecare warranty.

      Extendend warranties are a form of insurance. Insurance's purpose in life is to save us from financial catastrophes, such as a tree crushing a home or a major illness. In these cases, insurance is a wise purchase.

      However, purchasing insurance on small things, such as a PC or a dishwasher is not a wise investment. For small purchases, the insurance is more expensive than a potential repair, because things just don't break frequently. It is more likely that you will never use the insurance, which is why companies enjoy selling it so much. Add up all the money saved by not buying small-time insurance, and that occasional repair is simply not a big deal, even if it is $350.

      It is better to skip the insurance and spend the money on repairs when they are needed. In the long run, you will come out better off. An added benefit is that you maintain only a small number of insurances policies to track, which is helpful given their nitpicking complexity.

    9. Re:Apple, Gateway by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Often, when I recommend AppleCare to people, they say, "Well, I had $OLDER_MAC for $LENGTH_OF_TIME and never had a problem at all!"


      In the 6 years I've owned PCs, I've had 2 parts fail outside of the standard warranty, and 2 parts fail under warranty (outside of DOA parts which were simply returned for replacement). The 2 under warranty were taken care of very quickly by DiamondMM (when they were still DiamondMM anyway, those were 12MB Voodoo2 cards btw, destroyed by their own heat and the proximity required for SLI operation with the standard SLI cable). The two parts that failed outside of warranty were a CD-ROM drive (from excessive use) which cost $40 to replace with a faster drive, and a motherboard (a screw found it's way into a place you never want a screw to go during a move across country) which would have cost $100 to replace, if I hadn't decided to just upgrade to a faster CPU/RAM combination unsupported by the (now dead) motherboard.

      Of course, most of the parts I bought 6 years ago are still running strong in other people's machines, mostly family members that don't upgrade very often and mostly do web surfing / email / occasional work from home. I've also got one particular system that's running with no parts newer than 5 years, including a 2x DVD-ROM drive and a 6x2 CD-RW (and the only part I've ever bought that went up in price after I bought it: an ASUS P2B-LS motherboard that went up in price for a while because of the cost of the SCSI controller on the board), it's even running the Riva128 video card that I originally bought to run beside the V2 cards that ate themselves (though I've got a GeForce256SDR somewhere that I'm planning to put in there for the higher res & refresh rate support).

      In short, support contracts are only worth it in the worst-case scenario, otherwise they wouldn't be offered in the first place (after all, they have to make money). The only people that I would really recommend a support contract to are those that don't feel comfortable working on the computers themselves (which are, of course, most people) and don't have good relationships with anyone that does. The majority of computer problems are things that can be solved by careful observation of the problem and a careful check of all possible causes. Many times the most complicated thing that needs to be done to solve a problem is flashing the BIOS or making sure all of the cards are seated properly and all cable connections are correct.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    10. Re:Apple, Gateway by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 1

      In most cases I would agree with you. I generally ignore extended warranties on small ticket items at a department store or an elecontrics shop out of hand, because I know that they are generally poor value propositions.

      However, the specific case of the applecare extended tech support/full hardware warranty on an iBook is different.

      A laptop *is* likely to break at some point over a three-year span either from mechanical failure or (more likely) by human accident, especially if you are in a college environment. The minimum cost for a iBook repair is about $350, and the average cost is significantly higher. If you manage to damage your display screen, you might as well write the whole unit off.

      The applecare warranty is a good value.

    11. Re:Apple, Gateway by pizero · · Score: 1

      Apple Care also comes with an ~ $50 diagnostic tool, TechTool Deluxe. ($50 is an estimate based on a $50 upgrade price to the $100 TechTool Pro.)

    12. Re:Apple, Gateway by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1


      For me and my family Apple warranty services have been a lifesaver. My mom is a little out of the loop on the whole computer thing and she bought a PowerBook G4. So far she has broken the computer twice. The first time she blocked the vent and fried the power supply and the second time she dropped it cracked the 2 main parts of the case and the breaking the DVD drive. Just right there in less than a year is $700 for my silly mom if she wouldn't have been on warranty. When her warranty expires she will be buying Applecare. If you just have a desktop that sits are your house all day then it's probably pretty dumb to get Applecare, but if you have a laptop that goes back and forth to college, or a fourth grade classroom where students tend to drop things, then it's a lifesaver. Just my two cents.

      -Tim

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    13. Re:Apple, Gateway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, this is true. At Gateway, I think it matters what tech support person you get. One guy upgraded my fried vid card from a generic gf2 to a sweet gf3 w/ tv out and everything. But the next guy could only offer me a smaller hd when mine went out. I had a 40, but then they only carried 45 and 30's. He was set on just giving me the 30 and that I would just have to deal with it. Called the next day, got the same bs. Gave one last call and the guy gave me a 60 since I'd been without a hd for almost a week at that point.

      Persistence pays.

    14. Re:Apple, Gateway by pmz · · Score: 2

      A laptop *is* likely to break at some point over a three-year span either from mechanical failure or (more likely) by human accident, especially if you are in a college environment.

      Any object is likely to break if the owner is careless, and default warranties cover nearly all cases where the object breaks due to carelessness on the part of the manufacturer. If the object needs to be protected from its owner, perhaps a more robust version of that object is needed (like an armored laptop).

      At a college, it is arguable that the laptop will be stolen before it breaks, which is covered under normal household insurance policies. If it breaks due to someone else's carlessness, they are responsible for the cost of repairing it.

      I just generally consider the cost of something, even a computer, as a risk once the default warranty expires. If it breaks, I replace it, if not, I use it as long as it is practical. This works as long as I make purchases within my ability to spend (financing small purchases also makes no sense).

      The applecare warranty is a good value.

      Only if it provides something above and beyond just warranty service. If it includes hand-holding tech support for learning how to use the computer, it may be worth the cost. But, if it is just a warranty and nothing more, it isn't worth spending a sizable fraction of the purchase price for it.

    15. Re:Apple, Gateway by KrissKross · · Score: 1

      Remember that apple systems have a longer lifetime than typical PC counterparts.

      What??
      You mean Apple's technology develops more slowly?
      Apple users are writers, artists etc with no money?
      The rumors are true and Apple users ARE actually sexually attracted to their computers?

      Apples are largely built from the same components as the PC's they supposedly outlast.

    16. Re:Apple, Gateway by pmz · · Score: 2

      My mom is a little out of the loop on the whole computer thing and she bought a PowerBook G4. So far she has broken the computer twice.

      Perhaps she should stick to a cheaper computer; the iBook is much more reasonable in cost.

      Just right there in less than a year is $700 for my silly mom if she wouldn't have been on warranty. When her warranty expires she will be buying Applecare.

      This is another sign that the Powerbook wasn't a good match for your mother. If a product needs to be protected from its user, then something really is amiss.

      The right product will: meet the user's needs and not be so expensive as to require financing nor extended warranties. This results in a low-risk purchase that simply works better in the long run. The question should be: "Do I really need a full-blown PowerBook at greater than $2500, or can I get by just fine without spending as much money? The answer can be suprising.

    17. Re:Apple, Gateway by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Yeah, my (rather limited) experience with Gateway is that their phone support reps are very friendly and try their best to be polite and helpful. Unfortunately, this doesn't always translate into problem resolution - since technical know-how comes into play.

      EG. We bought a number of their slim desktop systems a few years ago at my work. (It was a trial thing, to see how Gateway stacked up compared to other vendors like Dell we always used in the past.) The systems came pre-loaded with Windows NT 4.0, as we requested. Unfortunately, they had issues booting to a black screen and freezing up when powered-on. Gateway's phone support tried and tried to help, but they just didn't know much about NT, and even less about why it might have issues on that particular system. I was finally directed to take a sample system in to the local Gateway store and let their technician analyze it. This turned into a big fiasco. They swapped out all sorts of irrelevant parts (hard drive, memory, etc.). After 5 trips back there, someone finally figured out it needed a BIOS update to a brand new revision Gateway just released. Problem solved, but this should never have happened in the first place. This was a system they advertised as being "NT ready" before we ordered it.

    18. Re:Apple, Gateway by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I haven't dealt with Apple's tech support, but their warranty package has kept me from buying their hardware. The base warranty is pretty skimpy, and the outrageously priced AppleCare plan is painfully restrictive about what it covers.

      FWIW, the warranties on my IIe and Imagewriter were only 90 days...so far, they've run without problems for 17 years. :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    19. Re:Apple, Gateway by fsbilly · · Score: 1

      right. maybe stretching.

      how about when i'm sitting at my desk mixing my cd and all of a sudden *POOF*... smoke out the back, not displaying sh*te, and a nice sizzling sound out the back. drat, now what? oh yeah! i bought 3yr AppleCare! i call, they say, "do you need a box to ship in?" yes. "OK, well send you a box with a shipping label." FedEx dropped off a box, picked up the the box, a couple days later, i had my montor back. yes, it would have been cooler if it hadn't broken. but they didn't ask if i had been transporting it in the front seat of a car in all sorts of positions... ohhh, that sounds nasty...

      anyway, Apple Support is good. not to mention their software support.

    20. Re:Apple, Gateway by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 1

      Apples are largely built from the same components as the PC's they supposedly outlast.

      The only difference is that Apple tends to choose more high quality components than average PC manufacturers.

      A top of the line Dell actually ought to last about as long as a typical Apple. But what about that $699 Dell system? They get the price that low by choosing the cheapest possible components.

    21. Re:Apple, Gateway by dootbran · · Score: 1
      If a product needs to be protected from its user, then something really is amiss.

      Hmm, maybe you haven't spent time around laptops and normal users. A guy I know works as a Sys Admin where many employees have been issued Dell laptops. These dell laptops are built to use the desktop for passive heat transfer so of course when they start to get hot what do the users do, prop the system up to add more airflow below the unit.
      He had to say that was wrong "because Dell said so" before they would believe him when he told them that was the cause of their laptops overheating and crashing. Not everyone is so technically knowledgeable and sometimes those people make mistakes. I am sure many people have made this type of innocent mistake.
      The right product will: meet the user's needs and not be so expensive as to require financing nor extended warranties. This results in a low-risk purchase that simply works better in the long run.

      I rarely purchase extended warranties on products I buy, most items are relatively well built and will outlast their usefullnes. I did purchase one with my PS2 though. After getting stuck with a dud PS1 I wasn't going to do the same thing again (I would have passed on the unit totally but GT3 looked too good). Hmm, $30 dollars or possibly $100-$300... seemed like a good deal on that one. Not all extended warranties are good but some do exist . As an ibook owner I am not sure if I'll pick up the extended warranty but I definitely would not consider my preference to spend $250 now as apposed to chance $1200 or whatever a 700 will cost in a year to replace or repair as a reason that I made a mistake in purchasing it. You are confusing the ability the shell out the money with the willingness to shell out the money.
      Although, it is usually a good idea to stay away from debt but all things come down to a personal choice and there are circumstances where financing can be helpful. Then again, what does financing have to do with customer service.
      The question should be: "Do I really need a full-blown PowerBook at greater than $2500, or can I get by just fine without spending as much money? The answer can be suprising.

      And the answer is probably "none of your damn business."

      What does this have to do with apple's customer service or the value of AppleCare? If the lady bought the computer she had a reason, what that reason was, be it a need for larger display, faster processor, or even that it looked cute, isn't really part of any discusion here. She clearly had the money to purchase the product and might just *gasp* be happy with it.
  5. Re:Tech support by Odiche · · Score: 1

    Shoot HP, they have no f*&king clue on how their systems work, or even what goes into them. Last time I buy a friggin machine from them, and this was before the DCMA comments that I decided upon this. I asked for a windows 2000 solution to a problem, specifically stating the solution needed to be for windows2k, they responded with an XP solution.

  6. More than that... by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First line tech support are mostly fools in call centres, so you'd expect those with the worst customer service to have the lowest opinion of their customers. Possibly the higher the training and morale level the less the customers are seen as, and treated like, idiots.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  7. Profitability by hooded1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In amny ways tech support is a waste of money for the computer companies. Most people aren't very intelligent consumers. By intelligent i mean people who would pikc up a copy of consumer reports and closely analyze the the details of a brand of computers such as how good their tech support is. Instead most people will buy things based on the specs, the looks, and the price. So, for the msot part Compaq's crappy tech support doesn't hurt them, because the person who needs tech support has already paid for the product and therefore any time they spend on them represents a loss in money.

    Dell is the top manufacturer of PCs, no doubt largely because of its good technical support, however the contrast in the number of sales for Dell vs Compaq doesn't correlate well with the tech support satisfaction numbers.

    --
    A rabbit in the hand is worth 4 in the cage
    1. Re:Profitability by alcmena · · Score: 2

      Not true. Word of mouth is the best (or worst) advertisement that companies can get. I believe it's called the 1-10 rule, or something like that. It goes like this... If you make one customer happy he/she will go and tell one friend about how great of a company you are. If you make one customer upset, he/she will go and complain about you to ten friends.

      In both cases, the friends are likely to pass the information on, so you can quickly see which tree builds faster. In short, if you screw over a customer who already bought from you, you likely just lost 10 more who might have.

    2. Re:Profitability by slimme · · Score: 1

      I work at a company where the person responsible for buying hardware will never ever buy Compaq. We are 100% Dell.

      Why would that be?

    3. Re:Profitability by ogar572 · · Score: 0
      Dell is the top manufacturer of PCs, no doubt largely because of its good technical support

      They need "good" tech support to support the shit that they make. I am on my fourth replacement laptop from Dell.

    4. Re:Profitability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd argue that money spent on tech support is extremely usefull for computer companies, because most people won't research the brands in advance. Most consumers are going to make their choices based on word of mouth and good tech support will generate better word of mouth than any marketing campaign.

      If Uncle Bob had a bad experiance talking to Compaq tech support, you better beleive he'll tell all his relatives. Conversely, if Grandma's problem with the CAPS LOCK is solved by the nice young tech from Dell without making her feel stupid, she'll tell everyone for months. Those are the things people remember, not what score each manufacturer got on a Consumer Reports poll.

    5. Re:Profitability by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      and yet the Consumer Reports results showed that Dell had the lowest number of actual problems and failures (Apple was 2nd in that portion, though 1st in support). Personally, I don't like store-bought computers, but the Dell they gave me here at work seems to be really easy to work on (they 'accidentally' shipped it with a CD-ROM instead of CD-RW, so we had to open it up and replace the drive once they shipped the new drive), which is more than I can say about most of the Compaqs and HPs I've opened up.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    6. Re:Profitability by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Those toolless dell cases are quite impressive, and were long before everyone else's consumer versions were. However, I still prefer the sturdyness of the Kayak (HP's PC workstations)chassis, it feels solid, and once you get the drive rails, disk swaps are trivial.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:Profitability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now once again, One customer with a bad experience will spread to thousands of others causing a big problem for particular companies. But if he would only explain why his portable machines were replaced, then maybe we could clarify if this is an actual honest complaint, for all we know, he ordered a machine specially and dropped it 6 months later, got it replaced for free (complete care warranty) and since its been 6 months, his Dell Plus image is now deleted because HE did not buy the warranty to keep the image and now hes raising hell because HE did not ensure he would have his image stored, or because maybe he ordered an incompatible configuration and he insists on getting it replaced that way, receives another, same way, same results, and cant quite comprehend what 'incompatible' means...

    8. Re:Profitability by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      No, initially, you were probably correct. But now we're entering the era where the vast majority of new computers sold are not being sold as "first systems". The customers they're getting now are mostly repeat customers, back for a second or third PC.

      The average person shops primarily based on price, but also, based on past experiences. (EG. A friend of my mom's just decided to buy herself a new PC. She had an old Compaq she was very pleased with. I asked her why she liked it so well. All she talked about is the way their tech. support people always gave her assistance when she had problems using it.) She wanted a notebook this time around, and wanted to buy it locally. I pointed her towards a Toshiba, which she happily bought only after asking me if they had a toll-free number for support, if they offered a reasonably priced extended warranty, and if they were generally good about phone support.

      (I knew Compaq has gone downhill on tech. support over the years - and didn't want to see her grab a Compaq notebook, only to be disappointed.)

    9. Re:Profitability by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Huh? How new are these? I bought two Macs two years ago. To get inside, I lift a handle on my G4 or two tabs on my iBook. Yes, i need quarters or pennies to get at the battery, but those aren't tools. And these weren't the first of their kind with these form factors.

  8. Re:Apple? by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do you think people buy German cars? It's partly the engineering and partly the aftersales service. (Okay, it's also partly a status thing too....) ;-)

    I defected from Apple for quite a few years...but when I started doing more creative stuff again, I went back. Glad I did....they seem to really trying to give customers a solid product offering these days. However, they're also not trying to be all things to all people.

    -psyco

  9. Re:Apple? by jlower · · Score: 2

    Yes, you do. What other computer company creates actual 'brand loyalty' like Apple?

  10. How accurate is this thing? by RandomPeon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    5 percent bought a computer that was completely inoperable within the first month; another 11 percent said they had problems in the first month but the computer was usable.

    This seems ridiculously high to me. 5% of computers are unusable in the first month? No explanation is give of what constitutes "unusable". Does it mean the hard drive is physically crapped out or something like "the Internet is broken again"?

    Furthermore, Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture - the Dell customer has no particular love for the company.

    1. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Marioroi · · Score: 1


      W H A T ?

      Is this how you would do it:

      1. Ask how satisfied the customer is (0...10)

      2. If satisfaction >= 5 then ask if the customer has 'particular kind of satisfaction' with the company. If yes, then lower the satisfaction and return to step one. Repeat until satisfaction low.

      Brilliant!!

      --
      .. . .. . . . . .. . *blob*
    2. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Draoi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      [..] comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture - the Dell customer has no particular love for the company.

      Ask yourself the question, why not??

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    3. Re:How accurate is this thing? by george399 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      it's just that comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture

      Is this not the frickin' point of a customer satisfaction survey? Ask the [Apple/Dell] customer how the [Apple/Dell] service is. So yes, it would weight in Apple's favour if Apple's customers like Apple, and then have a good experience with Apple's service. I would bet Dell's rating might drop if you asked Apple customers!?

      You can't blame Apple for having enthusiasts which in turn rates their customer service satisfaction higher. That's the whole point of a customer satisfaction survey.

      Disclaimer: Yes, I like (certainly not love) Apple, but I also don't generally like Consumer Reports (they tend to have their head up their ass when it comes to rating products that are a little more complicated. i.e. bicycles)

      --
      Patience is a virtue, but I don't have the time - TH
    4. Re:How accurate is this thing? by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      Furthermore, Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts

      True there are plenty of Mac fanbois (just like there are Linux/Windows/Amiga fanbois), but Apple's customer service sometimes *REALLY* goes above and beyond...

      When Apple finally released Nvidia's Gforce 4TI for the 2002 PowerMac, I looked over the specs, thought about buying it, but ultimately left the video card sitting in my shopping cart on apple.com's website.

      A few days later Apple Customer Service called me at work to "see if I had any questions about the Gforce." Sure they were looking for a sale & I wasn't too interested in buying it, but it was nice to see Apple putting forth the effort.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    5. Re:How accurate is this thing? by stefanb · · Score: 1
      A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts.

      This seems ridiculously high to me. No explanation is given of what constitutes "enthusiast." Does it mean that they would rate a crapped out hard drive "almost usable"?

      Furthermore, Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers have called tech support. Not that there is anything wrong with that, it's just that comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture - the Dell customer has no particular love for tech support.

    6. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 5, Insightful
      This seems ridiculously high to me. 5% of computers are unusable in the first month? No explanation is give of what constitutes "unusable". Does it mean the hard drive is physically crapped out or something like "the Internet is broken again"?
      When we bought a bunch of PCs to build a cluster here in the lab, one out of 16 did not work (I think it was the motherboard, I can't remember), while 16 is not exactly a good sampling, the failure rate was above 5%. Between hardware duds, shippement errors, installation errors and configuration problems, 5% seems quite resonable to me. While the average /. guy could probably solve those problems, the average user cannot. Also note, that "the internet is not working" is a good definition of unusable if you bought the computer to go on the internet. When rating customer satisfaction having an objective reference makes little sense.
      Furthermore, Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts. Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture - the Dell customer has no particular love for the company.

      Huh? Because Apple customers like Apple products they should be excluded of a customer satisfaction survey?

      You argue that because they are Mac enthousiast they will have a better perception of Apple's tech support. Has it occured to you that maybe Mac enthousiast are enthousiastic because of the quality of Apple's tech support and that the probable reason that the Dell customer has no particular love for the company is because their products are not very satisfying...

    7. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This post is not insightful, to be credited as such, a required prerequisite is that it contain accurate insight. To me, 'Customer Service' starts the day I take home or receive the computer. Every subtle nuance of the computer that facilitates its ease of use reduces the need to call customer service, a good product takes the place of customer service. Granted things will go wrong, but when things don't go wrong, that should be a credit to the company as well. This is why Apple users (yes, I am one), think so highly of the company.

    8. Re:How accurate is this thing? by 47PHA60 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts."

      Attacking the survey methedology with a vague unsupported assertion is not really the way to prove a point.

      The reason I doubt your assertion is that during the 'dark years' before Jobs return, customers were leaving the platform and making their dissatisfaction with the quality of the product and support well known.

      I think that one reason Apple might rate high is that they are responsible everything on my computer: the hardware, the OS, Final Cut Pro, the iTools, the iPod, and so on. Also, their stuff no longer seems to break as often as it did 4 years ago.

    9. Re:How accurate is this thing? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2

      Has it occured to you that maybe Mac enthousiast are enthousiastic because of the quality of Apple's tech support and that the probable reason that the Dell customer has no particular love for the company is because their products are not very satisfying...

      I'll grant you the first point, But is it not also possible that being Mac enthusiasts to begin with, they might be likely to gloss over any bad experiences theyve had with tech support?
      Also, Joe Sixpack has no brand loyalty to computers. If he buys a Compaq, and gets screwed by compaq somehow, next time he'll get a Dell. If Dell works out better (in tech, or price, or what have you) then next time he'll get another Dell. Or maybe he'll get a locally built machine for 500$ cheaper. who knows. point is, the majority of Dell owners are NOT wearing "Dude you're getting a Dell(tm)" Tshirts and pimping Dells to their friends, as some Mac users i've known. They simply use whatever works at the time.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    10. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture

      Sure it is. Where did the Mac fans' enthusiasm come from? Apple didn't create it out of thin air.

      (I know it wasn't all their tech support, but the hardware quality, the user interface design, the strength of their tech support all come from the same attention to the customer and the product.)

    11. Re:How accurate is this thing? by tmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Huh? Because Apple customers like Apple products they should be excluded of a customer satisfaction survey?

      The original point is well-taken, in that Mac users are more often than not die-hard Apple users and as such are more likely to view Apple favorably, independent of the service they receive. Such users have also likely made an active choice to buy Apple because of the company and not (say) because of the software available.

      In contrast, PC users aren't usually Dell- or HP- or IBM-zealots - such users usually view PCs as clones which are interchangeable,and a far smaller percentage of PC-users are Wintel-zealots as compared to Mac-users being Apple-zealots...so if a PC-user gets lousy service or whatever from Dell, they're probably not jeopardizing their world view by saying so.

      The active - and idiosyncratic - decision to buy Apple likely brings with it a cognitive dissonance that Compaq/Dell/IBM users aren't going to face.

      I think it is a very similar issue to the zealotry that users of more esoteric operating systems tend to show (think BeOS, Amiga, Linux, OS/2). These users have made an active commitment to something that is not the norm, and it is this active commitment that will force them to psychologically jump through hoops to rationalize nearly every aspect of their OS, even if their OS of choice is imperfect in someway. Contrast this to Windows users, who rarely view themselves as having chosen Windows in any substantial way.

      There are tons of social psychology experiments that demonstrate the cognitive dissonance effect. When zealotry comes into play, objectivity has to suffer.

    12. Re:How accurate is this thing? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      When Apple finally released Nvidia's Gforce 4TI for the 2002 PowerMac, I looked over the specs, thought about buying it, but ultimately left the video card sitting in my shopping cart on apple.com's website.

      A few days later Apple Customer Service called me at work to "see if I had any questions about the Gforce." Sure they were looking for a sale & I wasn't too interested in buying it, but it was nice to see Apple putting forth the effort.


      In my book, that's not good customer service, it's invasion of my time & space and going too far (calling me) to try to sell a $400 part. It's good customer service when the $400 part breaks because of a design problem and they don't give you any shit about the return or make you wait for an hour to get to the next level of support.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    13. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Matthias+Wiesmann · · Score: 2
      The original point is well-taken, in that Mac users are more often than not die-hard Apple users and as such are more likely to view Apple favorably, independent of the service they receive.
      Do you have any data to back this up? A lot of people have wierd ideas on mac users. I agree that the evangelists tend to make a lot of noise, but there are not exactly representative. Saying that mac users are die hard, unobjective zealots that suffer from cognitive dissonance sounds to me at best as a gross generalisation.

      Most mac users I know are mostly people who know (or want to know) little on computers and want the system to just work. If they are not satisfied with something, they will say it. My mom's (yes she has a iMac) view will not shatter if she complains about stuff - as a matter of fact, she tends to complain a lot.

      The few people I know who are strong mac fans tend also to be vocal in critizing Apple because they are fans.

      • As they identify more with the product, they are also more genuinely disapointed when it fails.
      • They have very high (unreasonable I would say) expectation on Apple products.
      • Apple tends to listen to some extent to those people. I never heard (might be wrong) of Dell changing a design because of popular demand.

      So while I agree that Apple's target andience is different from Dell (they cater different markets), I'm far from convinced that this crowd is so easy to satisfy for tech support, as it included a large proportion of computer illiterate people and a bunch of loud mouths that complain a lot.

    14. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > This seems ridiculously high to me. 5% of computers are unusable in the first month? No explanation is give of what constitutes "unusable". Does it mean the hard drive is physically crapped out or something like "the Internet is broken again"?

      Actually, I'd believe it.

      Consider a 5% DOA rate on CPUs/heatsinks/RAM jarred loose from shipping.

      As a DIY d00d, the first thing I do when I get a new box is rip open the cover, unplug/remove everything, and reseat it. The first thing I do after anything that looks like a hardware failure is remove/reseat the suspect component. And if that fails, I then start swapping components to the extent possible - try another drive and see if BIOS detects it. Swap with known good RAM. Swap with slower CPU if I have a spare CPU handy. Etc.

      Problem is, for someone who buys "a computer", and especially for someone who wants "support" or a "warranty", that's not within their skill/comfort range to do, and they often don't have spare parts to swap and isolate the problem.

      So from their perspective, the "computer's" "completely unusable", and has to go back to the "store" - even if it's just a 5-minute fix.

      (I feel sorry for retailers and Joe Sixpack alike. I love being able to call a (reputable) vendor and say "Sorry, motherboard's DOA, 'cuz the CPU, RAM, and drives are fine in my spare board. I can either send back the entire system, or just the mobo."

      The best thing about dealing with screwdriver shops and small-but-reputable vendors is that you don't have to waste half an hour on hold and another 15 minutes walking through the "What version of Windows are you running?" (irrelevant, the box won't POST, goddamnit!) script to get to the issue.)

    15. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      They simply use whatever works at the time.

      Or rather, they use what doesn't work at the time, and buy from some other maker in the hope that that will work.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    16. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Well, us Mac enthusiasts don't know how Apple customer support is, because we never needed them, everything works perfect from the start. But we always give it a 10 anyway, just to mess those reports up ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    17. Re:How accurate is this thing? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      I really don't know, but I can say that I never experienced lots of tech-support happiness with Apple.

      A while back, I got one of those Apple Quicktake digital cameras. It quit taking pictures... just completely died. I called Apple, trying to find out repair costs and where to take it. That was like pulling teeth! Nobody at Apple seemed to know what to do with the Quicktake. They kept trying to forward me to people in the "Apple imaging dept.", claiming they "believed that was the area that supported those devices". The guys in imaging couldn't help either, though. They said the cameras were really made by Kodak for Apple, and being a non-native Apple product - they had little to offer in the way of assistance for them. Someone gave me a number to Kodak, who in turn, refused to support the Quicktake - and sent me back to Apple.

      I finally just went to a local photo store/Apple dealer, thinking that was the ideal place to take the thing. No help there either! They said they never sold the Quicktake at their store, and had no information on it. I finally gave up and threw the thing away!

    18. Re:How accurate is this thing? by daeley · · Score: 2

      Furthermore, Apple is a terrible company to include in this kind of survey. A very large percentage of their customers are Mac enthusiasts.

      Trust me, speaking as a Mac user and friend of Mac enthusiasts, you haven't heard *anybody* bitch and complain about Apple worse than ardent Mac enthusiasts. If Apple does anything that doesn't match what's come before (e.g. no spring-loaded folders in OS X), the enthusiast will climb to the top of the nearest mountain, put a soap box down, climb on top of that, pull out his bullhorn, and call Apple the worst names you've ever heard. All because something is different. That was the irony of the Think Different campaign: hardcore Mac users are the most reactionary, conservative folks when it comes to "their" operating system.

      Having said that, I'll stop using my Mac when they pry the translucent keyboard from my cold, dead hands. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    19. Re:How accurate is this thing? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Mac users are more often than not die-hard Apple users and as such are more likely to view Apple favorably, independent of the service they receive.

      First of all, you need to prove this. How much noise a person or group makes is not evidence of their lack of independent thinking.

      Secondly, so what? Are you suggesting we should exclude "fundamentalists" from voting, because they'll probably "psychologically jump through hoops to rationalize nearly every aspect of their" political belief?

      What you suggest, if true, is an interesting phenomenon. It has, however, exactly zero relevance in a poll. An extremist opinion is just as important as yours.

    20. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've used macs and PCs and I'm not a mac enthusiast. In fact, I avoid them whenever possible. (though OS X is really cool)

      My mother IS a mac enthusiast, and the reason she's a mac enthusiast is very simple. She has NEVER (not once) called mac tech support.

    21. Re:How accurate is this thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they have a choice (and while being at it save a bundle).

    22. Re:How accurate is this thing? by RandomPeon · · Score: 2

      Umm, because they sell a commodity. If I don't like what I get from Compaq or Dell, I blame them and switch. When Red Hat 7.2 was screwed up out of the box on my machine, I didn't spend days trying to fix and calling tech support. I ditched it for Mandrake. There's a large contingent of Mac (and Linux) users who don't think like this. They blame themselves. OS 9 crashes a lot not because you did anything wrong, but because it's a hulking pile of crufty crap. No real memory protection, suprise, it crashes a lot.

      Apple has convinced people that they're "different" and that if you want to be "different" and "special" you'll buy their machines. It's about advertising, not about products. "Different" in this case means proprietary, expensive, unupgradeable hardware, software, and protocols to an outside observer. For a very long time it meant one of the worst operating systems ever brought to market but it had prettier widgets combined with obscene amounts of sugar-coating. WTF does "rebuild the desktop" actually mean? I've never seen a company that treats its customers like total morons get so much adoration.

    23. Re:How accurate is this thing? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      YES! Spring-loaded folders! They're coming back in Jaguar! That's worth $30! So is being able to use the keyboard again in Open/Save boxes! That's worth $40!

      Oh, wait.... that covers my student price. And I haven't even mentioned Quartz Extreme or Rendezvous. Ah well, another thread...

      Hey, remember how we were during the 10.0 period? Sheesh.

    24. Re:How accurate is this thing? by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      Apple tends to listen to some extent to those people. I never heard (might be wrong) of Dell changing a design because of popular demand.

      Are you perhaps referring to the Public Beta? Heck, I know how pissed I would've been if they'd taken away the Apple Menu. That and three other menus have been in every (?) version of the Mac OS.

      Trivia for the day: The Mac OS's Finder menus were originally all verbs.

    25. Re:How accurate is this thing? by alexburke · · Score: 2

      Ask yourself the question, why not??

      You should have kept reading...

      Not that there's anything wrong with that, it's just that comparing an Apple customer's perception of Apple support with a Dell customer's perception of Dell support is hardly an accurate picture - the Dell customer has no particular love for the company.

      This is true indeed. I don't know if it's grounds to exclude Apple from such a survey, but the poster did have a point...

  11. Dell v. Gateway by drunkmonk · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work at a university and we have a huge computer contract with Dell, so pretty much every PC we have comes from them. We don't have much trouble with them, and when we do, the service has been excellent. Of course, we don't call the home user line, either, but if you're a corporate user I'd recommend them wholeheartedly.

    Now, as for Gateway... when I was in high school, I worked for a company that had an outsourced tech support contract with Gateway. I was on hand when Windows 98 rolled out and all the poor Windows 95 users screwed things up when upgrading... I can honestly say that they hired anyone that could effectively grip a mouse. It was sad, but maybe things have changed.

    1. Re:Dell v. Gateway by ryanjays · · Score: 1

      I can honestly say that they hired anyone that could effectively grip a mouse.

      Funny you should mention that. I, too, during high school, worked for a company that handled Gateway's outsorced tech support calls. I can honestly say that they hired one person who was actually physically unable to grip a mouse. He was in a wheelchair with a birth defect that left him with barely any hands or feet. Don't get me wrong; he was excelent at answering calls and dealing with people, but he moved the mouse around with his stubs and chicken-scratched at the keyboard.

    2. Re:Dell v. Gateway by DeadMeat+(TM) · · Score: 2
      I can honestly say that they hired anyone that could effectively grip a mouse. It was sad, but maybe things have changed.
      A couple of months ago, I was hired by a local company as a network consultant. They originally called Gateway and asked for a Gateway-recommended network guy, but they changed their minds once they called the guy Gateway recommended and he was literally too stoned to remember what day it was.
  12. Re:Apple? by eddy · · Score: 1

    nVidia, Matrox, Intel, AMD?

    Depening on how you interpret 'like Apple'.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  13. --- Dell Tech by Rudy+Rodarte · · Score: 3, Funny

    Duse, I work for dell, so I know first hand what us guys go through. Here are some of my favorite tales: A guy is mad because his region 4 DVD player will not play the Playboy DVDs he bought A guy tells me he will make my life hell and come after me because I would not give him a bios password for a portable. A lady blames me for having to reinstall her OS(She had every P2P program on earth, along with every spyware you can think of, plus a virus or 2) A guy asked me how to remove a picture from the desktop before his parents got home and how to remove that picture from the list of backgrounds. A lady that said she would always get porno pop ups. Only her and her husband use the system. Good times!

    1. Re:--- Dell Tech by alen · · Score: 2

      That's awesome. I really can't understand how someone can take it in customer support. I'll join the military again and jump out of airplanes before I take any customer support job.

    2. Re:--- Dell Tech by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > jump out of airplanes before I take any customer support job.
      Sounds like a good deal to me (some of us like jumping out of perfectly good aeroplanes)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:--- Dell Tech by lostindenver · · Score: 1

      As someone who has Done TECHNICAL SUPPORT for the past 8 years (yes IM NUTS). But I deal with everything from Accountants and Developers to Oil Well Workers.

      I must say that just working with the people in A computer field are 10 times more rude, and pushy. I had a MCSE get on me beacause I am JUST a helpdesk tech. SOme of us LIKE and ENJOY helping people, NOT all Computer people are introverts. Some of just like the challange of helping people.

    4. Re:--- Dell Tech by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      What does this have to do with the fact that I enjoy skydiving?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    5. Re:--- Dell Tech by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I can understand where you are comming from. You just have to make a game of it. Face to face dealings are just as bad. "I can't pay my bill's online because XP won't accept cookies, what's a cookie." Wah!

    6. Re:--- Dell Tech by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I must say that just working with the people in A computer field are 10 times more rude, and pushy. I had a MCSE get on me beacause I am JUST a helpdesk tech. SOme of us LIKE and ENJOY helping people, NOT all Computer people are introverts. Some of just like the challange of helping people.


      I'd have to agree. I've done quite a few rounds of volunteer support for a particular game (by rounds I mean months at a time stopped by having too much to do usually). It can get a little frustrating having questions asked that are answered on the faq they got my email address from, or having people flip out because you can't give them a satisfactory solution right away (remember voluntary 3rd party for free support here, not support from the vendor or for pay on either side), which usually only happens immediately after a patch anyway. The one thing that's very surprising, though, is the sheer diversity of problems (and the causes of those problems) that come from one game. I can honestly say that if the problem is hardware related (at least with this particular game), 90% of the time it's one of three things:
      1) poor OpenGL drivers (primarily ATI cards at the time)
      2) poor AGP drivers (primarily Via chipsets)
      3) overclocking to just beyond tolerance (ie if they step it back just slightly they have no problems and almost everything they do other than gaming has no problems at all at the current state)

      It's amazing, though, what people will do to their computers, and what people will install on their computers. People will complain that their computer is regularly 'crashing', and it turns out that the problem clears up when they remove Norton CrashGuard. A game won't work properly, and it turns out that shutting off anti-virus programs (McAfee virus shield and Norton auto-protect especially) clears it up. The majority of the problems are solved and can be found online, but most people don't have the experience or the exposure to the problems to have the fixes or know where to find them.

      In the case of many games, there's an online community formed around them that helps solve these problems, and a member of that community can often act as a go-between for people that aren't familiar with the community and just need help with a simple problem. The sad part is that most computer manufacturers and software developers don't know how to (or can't) form these kinds of communities for more general-use items, so the consumers are left with the more traditional tech support which may or may not have full access to these types of things (you have no idea how many times I got questions that started with "I contacted XXXXXX tech support and they didn't know how to fix this, but maybe you can help", and they turned out to be simple enough to fix, but not on the company's knowledge base).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:--- Dell Tech by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Gee wiz. In all of these cases, you deal with people who either do or do not follow directions, do or do not get very aggrieved, but at the end of the day, their problem was an episode, and they may never even call again. Dealing with stupid people all day is a drag, but the real killers come from politics.

      Try internal tech support for a company that accidentally drops a thousand user accounts, then decides to let every one of them call the helpdesk when they discover that their account is no longer there, and that the service level agreement gives the sysadmins three days to sit with their thumbs up their asses, you get no access to fix the problem, but have to tell people that everything is okay, and that we'll take care of it. Lie lie lie, all the live long day. I ended up quitting over having to lie all the time. Went to work for a company that stated in its IT support SLA "if we don't have root on it, we don't support it" and actually stood by it. It sucks being a human speedbump. Even someone bagging groceries gets honest work done.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    8. Re:--- Dell Tech by lostindenver · · Score: 1

      I replyed to the wrong parent. But skydivings a blast

    9. Re:--- Dell Tech by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  14. I used to be a big Dell fan until... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...I had to use their customer support.

    I've had two Dell computers without problem. The PCs worked fine for the duration of their life with me(2-3 years) and all was good.

    This past winter I was going to buy another one only I had a complete brain fart about the limit on my card since I had never used it to make a purchase over $100 online.

    So they send me an e-mail back saying the bank denied my purchase but did not give them a reason and I was to call Dell back, yadda yadda. So after figuring out about the limit from my card company I call Dell back and explain. I called the number they told me to call in the e-mail but after waiting 20 minutes to talk to them they had to rout me through to someone else because it wasn't the right department. So I wait another 20 minutes and I explain the problem to the next person...oh wait, it's not their department so they route me some place else. So I wait another 20 minutes and I explain the problem to the next person...oh wait, it's not their department so they route me some place else. Only this time my connection is disconnected...

    I was so irritated I just forgot about the entire thing. In 2 days they had to release my order (as said in the e-mail) and I never did get a Dell. I built my own computer (thank goodness).

    This could have all been avoided had I not bought the computer on the last day of a significant sale (free shipping -$90 plus a free upgrade or two, so I was saving quite a bit). Because of that I couldn't just cancel the order and configure and buy again.

    In any event, that entire ordeal soured me to Dell.

    After a great experience building my own computer months later, I'd never go back unless perhaps I ever bought a laptop.

    --
    -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    1. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by alen · · Score: 2

      It wasn't entirely Dell's fault. All online companies use fraud detection software. But Dell didn't handle it very well.

    2. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too used to be a Dell fan. I had a hundred Dell systems a few years ago, and the support used to be wonderful. Now the support stinks.

    3. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by inbox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What one needs to be careful about is using a single (or even several) anecdotal experience(s) to judge the quality of anything, including a company's customer service or related aspects of the business.

      Replace "Dell" in your story with "Sony" and you've got the next guy's experience. Do it again with "Gateway" and so on.

      In addition, for each story you have like this, there is a story about how a phone call to Dell resulted in a replacement hard drive showing up a mere 2 hours later, no hassle, no problem.

      The issue is, after surveying users and aggregating the statistics, etc... where do the companies rank? Dell doesn't rank bad because of one person's experience and Apple doesn't rank well because of one person's experience.

      Your experience was unfortunate and I know you are not doing this, but I wouldn't jump from your situation to "everyone who buys a computer from Dell will experience a similar hassle."

    4. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by HunterOfBeer · · Score: 1

      Your story is interesting, and I just want to add a couple of points.

      I want to reiterate what someone else already said - don't base your opinion on one experience. Every company messes up from time to time.

      You were dealing with the sales staff, not the technical support. This article was rating the technical support, which is handled by a completely different group of people at Dell.

      Your story shows us just how important the sales staff is. If they had at least one person competent enough to deal with your issue (which probably isn't that uncommon), they would have had another sale. What makes it worse for Dell is that they just lost a repeat customer. Since you already have two Dells, and you were looking at a third, it seems reasonable to guess that you would have bought a fourth, fifth and maybe even sixth computer from them if the third purchase had gone smoothly.

      Regardless of this one purchase, I would still recommend buying Dells. They're pretty solid machines - solid enough that I've never had to call technical support.

      -- NO SIG DUE TO AN ACCOUNTING ERROR

    5. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
      I agree with your sentiments and those of inbox.

      My experience is singular and I would still recommend Dell to a PC user that is not as inclined as myself to build thier own machin.

      Not going back to Dell has more to do with me prefering my gradifying experience of building my own computer than my frustrating support call with Dell. Dell just got the ball rolling for me. In a sick sort of way, I owe it to their customer sales support...or whomever they sent me to...

      Truth be told I resorted to buying one of their keyboards (what is with all these 200 extra button keyboards...can't a gal/guy get a plain old keyboard these days?), a logitech mouse, and a headset/mic just a few days ago from them because I was able to get a good deal.

      But you're right about Dell losing a (desktop) customer. Eventually I probably would have evolved to the point of building my own systems, but they moved the inevitable up at least one major purchase.

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    6. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      I hate when people do this. When you appreciate a company until you have one bad experience. I am not justifying their actions, but what obligation do they have to someone who tried to buy something without paying? Explain "brain fart" to your debtors.

      It's so easy to blame the company, but what did you do wrong? You tried to exceed your credit limit whether intentionally or not.

      This isn't even Tech Support. you pay for tech support when you purchase the product, so the support technicians are definately getting paid. But how do you pay for support to non-customers who's payment couldn't be processed? They really had no obligation to you at all.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    7. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can one-up you on this one.

      I ordered a Dell laptop a couple weeks ago. I knew I had a 700 dollar limit on my check card. Dell provided a place where I could specify the daily limit of my check card, so I did. The idea is they split the cost over several days. I ordered on a Wednesday. I received an email on Saturday morning saying that there was a problem with the order, call this number within 48 hours, and so on. The number has bankers hours though, so it was CLOSED for the next 48 hours. I called within an hour of when they opened, and they had already cancelled my order.

      I bet you can guess WHY. They charged my card for the full amount even though I specified otherwise when ordering it. So they re-submitted the order, and even though this is only 5 days from when I ordered it, they delayed the ship date TWENTY-TWO days. When I called them and asked them what the hell was up, they suggested I cancel my order. I did.

      I am currently waiting for my Gateway laptop to get here. Despite the fact I ordered the laptop a week after I cancelled my order with Dell, its supposed to get here TWO WEEKS before the Dell was.

      Matt

    8. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
      Maybe you should read a little more carefully.

      "When you appreciate a company until you have one bad experience."

      I plainly said that the reason I wouldn't order another computer from Dell had more to do with my excellent experience building my own than the one experience with Dell.

      "This isn't even Tech Support"

      Hmmm, perhaps that's why I called it customer support or customer sales support.

      "But how do you pay for support to non-customers who's payment couldn't be processed? " Ok, you have someone who is trying to be a third time customer on the line who already made the decision to buy an expensive piece of hardware from your company AND made the decision to try to get things worked out according to an e-mail your company sent him (i.e. this person defintely wants to buy it if he's going to call any sort of support line).

      So...Dell handling it bad doesn't give me a reason to be soured, not call back that night (hence order cancelled & price breaks no longer available), therefore not buying a Dell computer in the immediate future and eventually ending up waiting a few months, building my own, realizing making my own machine is better and cheaper than a Dell causing me to make the decision never to buy a pre-build machine (e.g. Dell)?

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    9. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by Fascist+Christ · · Score: 1

      "Customers Rate PC Vendors' Tech Support"
      Hmmm, perhaps that's why I called it customer support or customer sales support
      Who's not reading what?

      "In any event, that entire ordeal soured me to Dell."
      Dell handling it bad doesn't give me a reason to be soured, etc, etc, etc (etc)
      Can you be any more confusing?

      "When you appreciate a company until you have one bad experience."
      I plainly said that the reason I wouldn't order another computer from Dell ...
      Appreciation and repeat buisiness are two totally different things.

      You also try to defend yourself by saying they were wrong for treating you the way they did. I actually said, "I am not justifying their actions," and so I am not saying you were wrong on that part, nor that they were wrong. The way I see it, your credit was denied. Companies give preference to the paying customers. Saying, "I bought two computers before and now I want another one," doesn't put you high on their priority if you failed to shell out the money when requested. So, they put you on hold and deal with the paying customers first, such as those who are buying three computers at once (or three hundred).

      I agree that they were wrong to give you a runaround like that, I do not agree that it was entirely their fault. It's a shame the way those with low credit limits or little on hand cash get treated. Few people who are not in financial trouble ever experience that. Consider yourself enlightened.

      --
      TodayTM BillyJoelTM GoogleTMd for StitchTMes due to WindowsTM while RollerbladeTMing with an AppleTM and a PopsicleTM
    10. Re:I used to be a big Dell fan until... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
      "Appreciation and repeat buisiness are two totally different things"

      So you do repeat business with companies' services you don't appreciate? That's a new one. One might be getting a new one ripped by a company but you still appreciate their service enough if you go with them.

      I lost my "appreciation" for Dell's pre-built computer services (again, do I need to repeat myself? apparently) more so because of my experience building my own computer.

      I also clearly stated that I'd recommend them to someone else.

      And unfortunately you or Dell didn't enlighten me. It has nothing to do with a credit limit. It was a debit card in which I either guess wrong about it's daily limit or they messed up like the another person mentioned.

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
  15. HP Support is the pits by roushi · · Score: 1

    Man, I can't think of a single good experience I've had with them. Once, I lost the driver cd that came with my scanner and they wanted me to pay $20 just for the drivers to use the scanner I'd already bought. I'm sorry, but I'm not a corporation and I'd really like it if they treated me like a person.

    I have had somewhat positive experiences with Gateway and Dell, though I've never had to deal with their tech support, per se. Normally my problems with them have been relating to the fact that they never send me exactally what's on the invoice. Yea, I didn't want those $250 Boston Acoustic speakers anyways. Thanks for these $20 Altec Lansings and thanks for charging me $250 for them!

    1. Re:HP Support is the pits by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Since HP consumer & business PCs are going to be replaced by Compaqs, the quality of the machines are going to go down and tech support will get worse if the Consumer Reports article is to be believed.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    2. Re:HP Support is the pits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I lost the driver cd that came with my scanner and they wanted me to pay $20 just for the drivers to use the scanner I'd already bought.

      Exactly, you bought the scanner but you then lost the software. The price you paid for the scanner does not entitle you to free unlimited copies of the drivers if you lose the one you originally pay for. For example, what if you lost your copy of Windows or your computer's mouse. Do you think you're entitled to get another one for free because you already paid for one? It was your own fault for losing the drivers, not theirs. They're not preventing you from using anything. Your own carelessness is what's preventing you from using it. Why are you blaming them? Drivers don't just appear out of nowhere. It takes time and people (labor) to develop them. And that time and labor costs them money.

    3. Re:HP Support is the pits by roushi · · Score: 1

      I lost the cd, yes. I wanted to download drivers for my scanner, not have them send me a cd in the mail. They wanted to charge me $20. Any company that doesn't make drivers for their hardware available online is in dire need of going under.

  16. Re:How can they rate ?! by onion2k · · Score: 2

    PC == Personal Computer.

    Don't get confused about Windows, Intel, and IBM Compatibles.

  17. Bad numbers by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2
    I think part of the reason you have such high numbers for Apple is because they have control over the entire machine. They make the hardware, they make the software, and they certify the parts that hook up to their hardware. PC manufactureres don't have that luxury. Since all of these manufacturers bundle Windows with their machines, they also become liable to answer every single Windows question, and support every Windows version (2000, XP, 98/Me, etc.) Of course Apple is going to score higher numbers than the PC manufacturers, they know the whole damn thing. If Microsoft didn't put the burden of OS support on the manufacturers, you'd probably see higher numbers for the hardware manufacturers, and some really funky numbers for Microsoft.

    Yes, support is going down the tubes, and companies are pay lipservice to quality of support, while trying to get people off the phone as quickly as possible, but I think they deserve some credit for having to support something they weren't even involved with (the OS).

    1. Re:Bad numbers by klieber · · Score: 2

      I think part of the reason you have such high numbers for Apple is because they have control over the entire machine. They make the hardware, they make the software, and they certify the parts that hook up to their hardware. PC manufactureres don't have that luxury.

      That's simply not true. Apple does not design or build the RAM, CPU, CD-ROM, DVD, video card or any other major peripheral in the system. Apple does design their own mobo, granted. But so does Dell, Compaq and most other large PC manufacturers. It's only the whitebox screwdriver shops that use off-the-shelf parts. Plus, Dell goes through the same hardware certification process that Apple does to ensure a particular device will work as expected in their computer.

      --
      Gentoo Linux http://gentoo.org/
    2. Re:Bad numbers by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I think part of the reason you have such high numbers for Apple is because they have control over the entire machine. They make the hardware, they make the software, and they certify the parts that hook up to their hardware. PC manufactureres don't have that luxury.



      So maybe what you're telling us is that Apple has a superior business model, and if their competitors want the same customer satisfaction numbers, they would do well to emulate Apple's model?


    3. Re:Bad numbers by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2
      Not necessarily, I'm saying that Apple has more control over their software and hardware than most manfacturers are afforded using Windows (or Linux machines for that matter).

      Your support can still suck even with full control. Sun, HP/Compaq/Digital, and SGI also provide the OS with their hardware, and have varying degrees of support. Selling the OS as part of your hardware isn't a magic bullet, but it allows you as a manufacturer to keep control over the whole process rather than support a hodge-podge system.

    4. Re:Bad numbers by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      You missed the point. The point isn't that Apple doesn't use off the shelf parts like every other manufacturer, rather they have control over the operating system, where PC manufacturers do not. That adds to the burden on the support technician, who not only has to understand the quirks of the hardware they design, but also the quirks of an operating system they had little input on.

    5. Re:Bad numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So maybe what you're telling us is that Apple has a superior business model, and if their competitors want the same customer satisfaction numbers, they would do well to emulate Apple's model?" - kalidasa

      "Not necessarily, I'm saying that Apple has more control over their software and hardware than most manfacturers are afforded using Windows (or Linux machines for that matter).

      Your support can still suck even with full control. Sun, HP/Compaq/Digital, and SGI also provide the OS with their hardware, and have varying degrees of support. Selling the OS as part of your hardware isn't a magic bullet, but it allows you as a manufacturer to keep control over the whole process rather than support a hodge-podge system."

      That doesn't answer kalidasa's point. Apple DOES provide superior support (even if they can do so because their buisness model includes control of the OS and much of the hardware) so maybe their competitors should emulate their customer support model?

      Oh, and Apple's OS is UNIX so Linux users have a new choice for hardware.

    6. Re:Bad numbers by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I think part of the reason you have such high numbers for Apple is because they have control over the entire machine. They make the hardware, they make the software, and they certify the parts that hook up to their hardware. PC manufactureres don't have that luxury. Since all of these manufacturers bundle Windows with their machines, they also become liable to answer every single Windows question, and support every Windows version (2000, XP, 98/Me, etc.) Of course Apple is going to score higher numbers than the PC manufacturers, they know the whole damn thing. If Microsoft didn't put the burden of OS support on the manufacturers, you'd probably see higher numbers for the hardware manufacturers, and some really funky numbers for Microsoft.


      I think you're right and wrong here. For one, MS putting the support burden on the OEM means that the OEMs are basically in the same support position as Apple. After all, Apple's tech support doesn't know the software any better than Dell's tech support, though Apple may have a better pipeline to get support information back to the developers than Dell does.

      Another thing, though, is that despite Apple having better control over the full system (hardware and software), Dell still outranked them on the portion of the study regarding the percentage of actual problems (though Apple was still #2 there), meaning that while Apple has better support, you're less likely to actually have to call Dell support in the first place.

      Of course, this is all coming from someone that won't buy a desktop PC from an OEM (and won't buy an Apple desktop computer because they can only be bought from Apple pre-built in set configurations), and is currently looking at possibly spending a good couple of hours getting a new CPU/motherboard/RAM/power supply combo working properly tonite/this weekend because it is displaying some awfully strange behavior that I've never seen after putting together some 30-40 PCs in the last 6 years. There are trade-offs to building them yourself, and sometimes they're worse than expected.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:Bad numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not quite. Regardless of making the whole widget, Apple is superior to other vendors in my experience.

      Call Apple on-peak to report a problem, I got a tech within 5 minutes. We successfully diagnosed the problem within 10 minutes, and completed the processing to get a replacement part sent to me.

      Call Dell on-peak to report a problem, wait on hold for AN HOUR to even speak to someone. Talk to the tech, get transferred. Hold for another 10 minutes. Explain my problem. Tech sounds confused. Explain it again. Tech finally seems to get it, tells me Dell doesn't handle it, and to call Microsoft, and gives me a toll number to call. And the number isn't even right.

      Call Dell on another occasion with another problem. Two hours later, I give up and switch to e-mail support. I correspond with the tech for two weeks. Tech continually tries to get me to believe there's actually no problem with my system, and makes no move to work with me about getting it repaired.

      I wait a month and try again, when at this point things are so bad the system's barely usable. Phone line is still an exercise in "how long can you stay awake", so I go for e-mail support again. Again, the tech refuses to acknowledge there's a problem when one component is COMPLETELY DEAD. Regarding a secondary problem, the tech quotes a Dell Knowledge Base article completely unrelated to my problem. I attempt to restate the problem such that the tech gets it this time. They still don't. Both issues are still outstanding, though their tickets have been closed.

      Dell techs also seem to have problems believing that their customers could possibly know what they're doing, whereas the Apple tech adjusted to meet and accept my level of expertise. There's a reason Dell hasn't been able to update their site with more "customer service" awards lately.

  18. Scoring done like this isn't really accurate. by yeoua · · Score: 2

    It may sound accurate to those who are the ones getting the support, but it may not sound accurate to the ones giving the tech support.

    How many times would those low scores be attributed to the consumer not having a clue, blowing up, and then thinking to him/her self that the entire tech support thing was evil?

    Of course, there will be times where the reverse is true, when tech support will really be the ones who screw up, but being the tech support is their job.

    They can actually get fired... the consumer can't get fired.

    1. Re:Scoring done like this isn't really accurate. by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > How many times would those low scores be attributed to the consumer not having a clue

      The consumer shouldn't be expected to have a clue. Or would you rather computers remained niche items owned only by the technological elite?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    2. Re:Scoring done like this isn't really accurate. by dlh5069 · · Score: 1
      It may sound accurate to those who are the ones getting the support, but it may not sound accurate to the ones giving the tech support.

      It is necessary to be realistic with such surveys. Accuracy may be in the eye of the beholder, but in this case, it is a very powerful and meaningful metric. You cannot ask Dell or HP or Apple how well they serviced their customers' issues ("Oh, we did great. Great, I tell you!").

      How many times would those low scores be attributed to the consumer not having a clue, blowing up, and then thinking to him/her self that the entire tech support thing was evil?

      Whether or not a customer has a clue about how badly they've f*'d up the system has minimal bearing on their service experience. There are a lot of "customers are idiots" statements in this post, and while it may be true, it does not account for their perceptions of service.

      Customer service has as much to do with how a customer is treated as it does with whether the problem was solved. It is imperative for the technician/CSR/whatever to understand what the problem is before they can diagnose. The fact is that most technical support personnel (whether PC or not) tend to jump to conclusions because "they've seen it all before".

      Of course, there will be times where the reverse is true, when tech support will really be the ones who screw up, but being the tech support is their job.

      They can actually get fired... the consumer can't get fired.

      No, the consumer can't get fired. But consider this: The consumer just plopped down a chunk of change roughly equivalent to two weeks of this CSR's pay. So, which is more valuable, a CSR who manages to screw up a potentially lifelong relationship with a customer because he or she incorrectly diagnoses a problem? Or is the customer who, over a lifetime relationship of PC buying might just single handedly fund a year or two of a CSR's salary.

      Now is the point where I'm gonna go off-topic with an overused anecdote... Businesses are in business to make money.

      To make money you need customers. In a commodity business, whether it's BMWs or Macintoshes or Rolexes, a satisfied customer is a lifelong customer. Surveys like this one are the best way to determine how well a company is tracking against the goal of making lifelong customers.

      Now we beat the dead horse to make sure I'm mod'ed way, Way down... /.'ers are typically not average customers.

      I bet, in fact, if you cross-compared within this sample, the average customer of one manufacturer is not the average customer of another. We thrive on our technical literacy. Joe Quicken User or Mary iPhoto just want an appliance that they don't have to use voodoo to control. They tend to ask lots of questions. It's imperative (from a business case) that when they ask those questions, they're treated well.

      -dlh5069

  19. Re:Tech support by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amen, Apple most probably rate the best because the range of options in their machines is relatively small - but this has always been an Apple benefit, and it's the reason why services like Versiontracker work so well for the Mac - you can get your head around the size of the problem.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  20. what about sony by bummpyjojo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what about sony? they didnt make any of the lists. but they did make anouther report saying there notebook support was poor ( above gateway hp and compaq) anyone actually register with consumer reports to get updated info? please share.

    1. Re:what about sony by bafreer · · Score: 0
      Laptop Warranty and Support (3/02 consumerreports.org):
      • Dell: very good
      • Toshiba: good
      • Compaq: Excellent
      • HP: veru good
      • Sony: good
      • Gateway: very good
      • IBM: good
      • Apple: good

      karma-whoring finished

    2. Re:what about sony by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      In my experience, Sony's aftersales service on everything is shockingly poor. It's a shame, since they have some really great products. Although I never fail to be amazed by their just-out-of-warranty engineering. I have a Vaio F809K - the battery died when it was a week (actually 6 days) out of warranty. Most manufacturers would have replaced it either FOC or at a discout, just out of goodwill. Sony wanted full retail. I had a similar experience with a MiniDisc player (that was 3 weeks out of warranty).
      I dropped the stylus of my Clie which snapped the tip. I called Sony, and was told a replacement would be UK£8 (that's about US$12 - for a Palm stylus!). Since I had no option but to buy it from them, I ordered one and was told it would be delivered by courier next day (probably accounts, at lease it part, for the rediculous price). Two weeks later, I arrive home and find a soggy (it was raining) cardboard box on the doorstep - delivered by mail.
      The only GOOD story I have about Sony is my PS2 - it died a week before the warranty expired, so I took it back to the record store that supplied it - and they replaced it, no questions asked. But I do spend a lot of money in there.

      So after the last 12 months experience, I doubt I'll be buying any more Sony products. Which, as I said before, is a shame, since they have some damn fine toys out there.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  21. So are some of their products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot *believe* that you spring $250 for the HP LaserJet 1000 and the damn thing doesn't have an on/off switch. I couldn't believe it when I first set it up, so I looked in the manual for help; after all, there *has* to be a way to turn off a printer, right? Oh, good, there's the on-line user's guide help file and an index page in the list of contents titled "Turning the power off". Excellent...click...click...Woo-hoo! From the manual:

    You must unplug the printer to turn the power off.

    They even have a cute little sketch showing you how to pull out the power cord from the back of the printer.

    Cheap sods.

  22. Slashdot readers opinion not representative by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't think we slashdot readers can say much about the quality of customer service for a simple reason: the average slashdot reader probably has a larger understanding of computers than the average customer service employee.
    Point in case: I mailed compaq a few weeks ago, after I installed SuSE 8.0, because my computer was freezing, and the caps and scroll lock lights were blinking when this happened. I hoped the people at compaq could tell me if this was a diagnostic code.
    The support was pretty good; I got a response to my email in less than 15 minutes. I find that excellent. However, the poor guy at the support centre couldn't get a grip on what I was saying, because he consequently underestimated my knowledge of computers. His first response was to make me use the quick restore cd's, which would erase my hard disk and repartition it and reinstall the win98 se that originally came with the computer.
    My point is that if you're a professional yourself, your either better than the support guy or the support guy is not going to take you serious enough. Either way you won't be helped properly. That's why slashdot readers can't really have a representative opinion on help desks; help desks are aimed at nitwits (as far as their computer use goes anyhow).

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:Slashdot readers opinion not representative by paranoic · · Score: 1
      Are you sure youre restore CD will install windows? All mine does is enable the hidden partition on the hard drive where actual code was. Now just where do you think I found the room to dual boot linux on that laptop?

      Shame on them for installing a 6MB harddrive and telling me it's only 4Mb. Did you really think I wouldn't find out?

    2. Re:Slashdot readers opinion not representative by BoBaBrain · · Score: 2

      I don't think we slashdot readers can say much about the quality of customer service for a simple reason: the average slashdot reader probably has a larger understanding of computers than the average customer service employee.

      I whole heartily disagree. Perhaps the "average slashdot reader" has a larger understanding of computers than the average customer caller does.
      Remember, the customer service employee's job is not to wow you with his/her knowledge, but to solve most of the problems that come in. Truth be told, most of the problems *are* of the mind-numbingly simple variety.

      It may be a stand-up comedy cliché, but the best way to annoy someone is to explain to him or her something they already know. Doubly so for us geek types.

      Unfortunately, for these reasons, techie-egos and customer service protocol do not mix well.

      --
      I am a Karma Library.
    3. Re:Slashdot readers opinion not representative by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Shame on them for selling you a 6MB hard drive with any system that has a CD rom drive. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  23. Good ones... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 4, Interesting
    They don't remember the good ones? That's sad.

    A few years ago a Jaz disk would eject immediately after inserting it in the drive and I called Iomega. After going trough the automated stuff (push # for ...), I finally got a live person on the line.
    After the usual (cables, drivers, etc....) stuff she exactly told me what to do to make it stay in there (easy: keep your hand the disk, until it snaps, it never had the problem after that occurence). She even was very patient with me because I had to walk to the computer each time to do something because the phone and computer were in different rooms. After being helped, I thanked her for her friendly and useful help, and she actually sounded astonished anyone would thank her for the help.
    And now you say they don't remember the good calls? *snif* (Oh, and she had one kind of sexy voice with a slight Irish accent)

    1. Re:Good ones... by sahala · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (Oh, and she had one kind of sexy voice with a slight Irish accent)

      Not to over-generalize, but I do notice that women tech support tend to handle "bad calls" a lot better than men. They're less likely to scoff and think customers are idiots. I'm sure you all can think of a variety of reasons why this is the case.

      Of course this isn't a hard rule...

    2. Re:Good ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > she had one kind of sexy voice with a slight Irish accent
      So what was she wearing :-)

    3. Re:Good ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and she had one kind of sexy voice with a slight Irish accent

      Thats why Ireland and Scotland are popular places to base call centres because of the sexy voices(well, not Glasgow for sure, but the rest).

      I'm forever querying stuff at Dell just to kill time. If a guy picks up I just redial! :-D

    4. Re:Good ones... by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I make it habit to compliment good service wherever I receive it. When you find a person who is actually nice and personable, make sure to take their name down. Then write a letter to their supervisor. Not many people actually do this, so a single letter mentioning superior performance can make a difference on their next review.

      This isn't just for phone service. For instance, I just replaced my battery at Sears (at Vallco in Cupertino). A guy named Frank provided superior service and proved himself an all around decent human being. I wrote a letter to the manager and would recommend anyone to him and to that Sears.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    5. Re:Good ones... by hendridm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      > I had to walk to the computer each time to do something because the phone and computer were in different rooms.

      God this bothers the hell out of me. I'm trying to fix your problem and I have to wait while you walk back and forth and try to describe what you remember from the screen. Then between each click of the mouse you have to do the walk.

      If you can afford a computer you can afford a fucking cordless phone. Live in the now, you'll like it.

    6. Re:Good ones... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you think I should replace a completely functional phone with a cordless one just because it makes it easier to solve a problem I have on the computer? Come on, you don't buy a new car because you'd have airco. You won't buy a new television set, just because now there ate 16:9 TV's? Get a grip, please: normal people do not replace functional things when it is not needed.
      We now have a cordless phone, because my brother smashed the old one against the wall after getting angry with his girlfriend (during a call). You know what? We have much more problems with that phone: like not finding where we left it, running out of batteries and calls that tend to be much longer (and thus huger bills) because you can call from your bed/the sofa/wherever it's comfortable.
      Please, come back to the real world...

    7. Re:Good ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Okay, so you think I should replace a completely functional phone with a cordless one just because it makes it easier to solve a problem

      I most certainly do. Why are you hanging on to that old phone anyway? It's only $30 bucks or so for a cordless. Why didn't you buy a telegraph instead of that corded phone. You probably could have gotten them for a steal and save precious pennies. Can't you just buy one decent phone and leave the rest of the house wired with those dinosaurs? It would sure help in instances where you need/want to roam.

      Sincerely,
      Flamebait

    8. Re:Good ones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > We have much more problems with that phone: like not finding where we left it, running out of batteries

      Here's an idea - hang the damn thing back up when you are done using it. Solves both problems. No wonder tech support is such a nightmare. You people can't even handle your telephones.

      I suppose you only have one phone line too, so when you are on AOL you can't get calls from anyone. I bet that is a real treat to support you over the phone in another room.

      BONG!!

    9. Re:Good ones... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      Because 30$ is still 30$ that I couldn't spend on the important things in life. I rarely use the phone, it's there for emergencies and making appointments. If I want to roam, I've got a cell, thank you very much.

      Yup, you sure post flamebait and you should be modded as such...

    10. Re:Good ones... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      It's not me...It's my family. I don't touch the phone. I can handle phones, and so can my family. But you know teenagers phoning with their friends in their room and suddenly they have to leave...leaving the phone in the middle of their bed.
      I'm far from an AOL user...I haven't heard the sound of a modem in over 3 years. Don't call me an idiot (AOL == idiot around here), because I don't like phones nor want to waste money on them.

      For your information: I only called tech support once in my whole life, because most of the time I can figure it out myself. If everyone was like me tech support workers would be out of a job and begging food.

      Go and insult someone else, okay?

    11. Re:Good ones... by garyrich · · Score: 2

      "Not to over-generalize, but I do notice that women tech support tend to handle "bad calls" a lot better than men."

      AHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! No... When I was a manager for tech support reps (the horror...) the worst from a customer dissatisfaction index were women. On average you may have a point but the worst of the worst were female. Most trouble was one with an upper crusty Jamaican accent that made her sound snotty to americans even when she was trying to be nice. Add to that the fact that she really was a snotty bitch most of the time. I winced everytime she picked up a call, but she was unfirable for political reasons.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  24. My Mom's Mac by standards · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Mom was proactive and bought a Mac a few months ago. She had problems with connecting to the Internet.

    Since I know little about the Mac and how it accomplishes such things, and since I live about 2500 miles away from here, I said "Um, Sorry Mom, call Apple".

    And so she did. And to my amazement, they solved her problem. Not only that, but she actually emailed her good experiences to me within a couple hours.

    I have to admit this is the only good tech support experience I've heard from a PC company. Years ago, when I had a PC from another well known company, the tech support guys made me jump through 1000 hoops before they'd admit to a problem that could be fixed with a BIOS upgrade.

    Apple didn't make my Mom do that!

    1. Re:My Mom's Mac by Pope · · Score: 2

      My one and only tech support call was to Power Computing, one time makers of Mac clones. The hard drive was writing really slowly and often failing to boot. One quick call, and they FedEx shipped me a new Seagate AV-rated SCSI drive to replace the failing Micropolis one. I then shipped the old drive back to them. Bang, 3 days turnaround, and that Seagate is stil trucking strong 5 years later!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  25. Re:Apple? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

    why on Earth what I want to downgrade to a German marque when I have a Mazda?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  26. Re:How can they rate ?! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    Apple are the MOST PC of all computer companies, in my experience.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  27. For the price you pay for a Mac by DirkDaring · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...you better get damn good tech support. I don't expect the same support from a comparable PC at half the cost.

    Dirk

    1. Re:For the price you pay for a Mac by rampant+mac · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hyundai has one of the best warranties for a automobile manufacturer, yet they're one of the cheapest cars you can buy...

      Price shouldn't make a difference.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    2. Re:For the price you pay for a Mac by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > Hyundai has one of the best warranties for a automobile manufacturer,
      And my experience is that Mitsubishi has the worst. It looks good when you read it, but wait until you try and make a claim...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  28. Who is doing the support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it an apple employee trained to do tech support or an external support employee trained to support apple? Good job anyway.

    1. Re:Who is doing the support. by Draoi · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is it an apple employee trained to do tech support or an external support employee trained to support apple?

      [OBDisclaimer: I work for Apple, in fact the Euro support centre is next-door but right now I'm speaking just for myself.]

      Yes, Apple have full-time, trained employees working on tech support. They do in both the US support site (Sacramento, CA) and in Europe (Cork, Ireland).

      By the way, every new Mac sold also contains a diagnostic CD. The user can simply insert it, boot in 5 seconds and get a result back for tech support without even needing a supporting OS!! Kewl or wha' ....

      --
      Alison

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

    2. Re:Who is doing the support. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "By the way, every new Mac sold also contains a diagnostic CD. The user can simply insert it, boot in 5 seconds and get a result back for tech support without even needing a supporting OS!! Kewl or wha' ...."

      Very cool, except when Celine Dion cooked the CD-drives in certain Apple machines. My suspicion is that since Apple machines have very good design behind them, they protected the user from Celine by committing suicide.

  29. Why not? by Burning1 · · Score: 1

    Easy answer: most x86 PC users don't feel threatened by other platforms and/or manufacturers and thusly don't feel the need to become corporate patriots.

    1. Re:Why not? by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      Then again, it could be that Apple hardware tends to not be made from tinfoil and rubber bands. No, I don't own any Apple hardware, however I have been building PCs for ten years and run a lab of around three hundred machines, both Apple and PC. It is more along the lines of good experience versus bad experience. I'll never buy a GM made vehicle again... they are total crap and terrible to work on... then again, Ford makes a moving death trap out of most of their vehicles. So, I'll pay more and get a VW.

    2. Re:Why not? by swb · · Score: 2

      We have about 500 people in our company and roll all our desktops every 3 years. Since I've worked here 9 years, I've seen nearly three complete waves of desktops (and tail end of a previous one), or about 1500 machines. We bought a lot of Digital PCs, and when they became unavailable it was a carnival of Compaqs, HPs, Dells and then the last wave was all Dells. Macs are now all G3/G4.

      Then again, it could be that Apple hardware tends to not be made from tinfoil and rubber bands.

      Total rubbish from my experience. I found Macs to be overall more plasticky and less reliably manufactured than the PCs. We had countless problems with many series of Macs, including many people now working on rev 1 G3s who bitch about hardware bugs in the firewire ports. Then there was the recent powerbook powersupply problem and waves of problems with PB 520s (techs that would repair them would always bring extra parts because the ribbon cables would disintegrate). The G3/G4 lines have been an improvement, but look at the wasteland of problems with many Apples powerbooks that seem to continue to today.

      Of course we've had DOA PCs, PCs that had problems, PCs with icky case designs (all of the classic Pentium DECs), but never the patterns of problems with specific vendors or models that we had with Macs. They were unsexy and boring, but they generally worked. I've seen but never worked with much (because we didn't buy them) some pretty bad low-end PCs, but that was really olden-days 386/486 stuff -- bad cases, mobos with brand X parallel and serial port cards, and poor assembly.

      From a broad design and OS integration perspective, Apple has an advantage over PCs because of the single source nature of their products, but I don't think that this has meant a superior manufactured product in the field. Low unit numbers? Problems resulting from rapid design changes, parts source changes? Just bad QC? Who knows.

    3. Re:Why not? by TotallyUseless · · Score: 1

      rev 1 G3s did not have firewire ports. The PB 520 was ages ago. literally.

      --

      Time for some tasty Shiner Bock!
    4. Re:Why not? by swb · · Score: 2

      I think I meant the Rev 1 Blue and White models; its new information brought to my attention by a co-worker trying to figure out why a firewire CDR works flawlessly on several machines but dies on several others.

      The PB520 was ages ago, but at the time it was a problem. The first bunch of our machines to get fixed (and many required service) all had their ribbon cables disintegrate, leaving the machines further out of comission until new parts could be had; it wasn't until later that the service guys just ordered many extra parts because they got sick of fixing the machine twice.

      The point wasn't that Apples are necessarily bad, but that "Apples are superior" has really not been the case for us, based upon the machines we've had to deal with.

    5. Re:Why not? by jmu1 · · Score: 2
      I can certainly understand. We haven't had any Apple laptops so I can't say anything about them. However, untill recently, we've had no problems(minus third party Zip drives) with our biege, blue&whites, nor our quicksilvers. Mind you, we don't have nearly the expansive number of machines you do. Plus, I'm basing my experience on stuff I have built over the years and the "3 year rollover plan" that we have been working with Gateway on for several rollovers now. Once upon a time, we had Dells in here, but they were a total nightmare(Bios would reset it self/burn out for some reason). I guess you just get them in batches of bad... we had some Gateways that were very stable, and then the shipment after those were total trash. We've continued to use them mainly because management doesn't want to rock the boat... we have a campus-wide agreement with them. I'm in the Library, BTW... interestingly enough, we have our own Systems Group! Mainly what we have a problem with here is powersupplies, motherboards/daughterboards, nics, and harddrives. I know that sounds like a wide range, but since it happens so dang often, it starts to seem like the same thing over and over! ;)

      cheers!

    6. Re:Why not? by Galvatron · · Score: 2

      According to the article, Dell had FEWER breakdowns than Apple, so the quality argument doesn't hold water.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    7. Re:Why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a tremendous amount of poor engineering in the PC world. I once bought a video card which would lock up hard in any color mode greater than 8-bit. Not exactly stressing functionality.

      Apple does much better. They've sold some lemons through the years, but overall, they understand that better parts make a better user experience.

  30. Re:Tech support by NexusTw1n · · Score: 1

    I'm currently having driver problems with a 990cxi HP printer.

    Following a long, detailed explanation of the problem I got a reply from their tech support team (the address was something like 990_support@hp.com ) which was a cut and pasted FAQ, with the message "Please reply to this email if you continue to have problems".

    Needless to say if you try replying, the email gets bounced...

    An attitude like that guarantees I'll never buy HP again.

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
  31. Dell Support Services by Your_Mom · · Score: 2


    In my experience, Dell is top notch in Tech support services. I find their supprt staff clueful (mostly, you still get the occasional person who reads off the screen) and not hesitant to send out a replacement part. Opposed to Gateway where its like pulling teeth trying to convince them that you need a replacement part, or Toshiba who will not replace a hard drive until it has 20% bad sectors (HDD was 1-2 years old and was rapidly failing, it had a 3 year service agreement).

    Bottom Line: (IMHO) Dell rocks, Gateway Sucks and don't use Toshiba unless you like bending over.

    --
    Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    1. Re:Dell Support Services by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      I hear you about the Toshiba problem. I had the exact same issue - my drive, about 1 year old (had already been swapped out once in the past 2 years) started getting bad sectors. Now before I tell the story, I'm not sure what company I dealt with - it could be Circuit City's contracted support company that I went through this nightmare with; I don't have the information at hand right now. By the way; I was assured of a three year no questions asked warrenty, the salesman (yeah; I know, shouldn't listen to him) told me that I could drop it and they'd fix it no questions asked. The folks on the other end explained that I had to run fdisk and format; then report to them the number of errors I had (never said anything about 20%, but needed to verify that it was getting worse). At this point I had like 100 meg out of 6 gigs bad (as I recall) and was okay with doing it the three times required (well, not happy about it but understanding their requirements). Then the last guy I called (for the third reporting) was a complete idiot, told me that I wasn't do the right thing and that the two previous tech support people were idiots, he said 'whoops' and then told me he couldn't find anywhere listed where my sectors had been recorded. Long story short, I got a new drive, but it took me 4 weeks, calling almost every day (and in that 4 weeks, format and scandisk ran almost continually. I talked to at least 3 people who were complete idiots and didn't know what a bad sector was, one gentleman who was very helpful and knowledgeable (wish I would have his name or something so I could commend him). The other call I made a year before went really well; but this one sucked. I'll never buy anything at Circuit City again, and probably never by a Toshiba either.

  32. Some better statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Users:
    98% of all users believe technical support representatives can read their minds.
    45% of all users do not listen.

    Support:
    75% of all technical support representatives don't want to help you for good reason.
    90% of all technical support representatives with over 1 year of service are there for the money and don't care in the least.

    1. Re:Some better statistics. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 98% of all users believe technical support representatives can read their minds.
      That's because 98% of tech support monkies think they know everything. If they know everything, then they already know what the users are thinking and therefore don't need to read minds
      > 45% of all users do not listen.
      45% of tech support monkies don't say anything worth listening to.

      > 75% of all technical support representatives don't want to help you for good reason.
      The "good reason" being they're low-grade morons waiting for their next dose of soma
      > 90% of all technical support representatives with over 1 year of service are there for the money and don't care in the least.
      It's sad, really, that anyone would be in tech support "for the money" - there isn't any. I know people in support, and I make as much in a month as some of them do in a year...

    2. Re:Some better statistics. by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      76.3% of all statistics are invented on the spot

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:Some better statistics. by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      I thought it was 85.7%

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Some better statistics. by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > I thought it was 85.7%
      That figure is only quoted by 12.8% of sources...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    5. Re:Some better statistics. by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
      76.3% of all statistics are invented on the spot

      I thought it was 85.4%!

      --

      -----

      Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

    6. Re:Some better statistics. by majestyk2000 · · Score: 1

      "90% of all technical support representatives with over 1 year of service are there for the money and don't care in the least."

      That's a laugh. I don't know how much techs get paid in your area, but no one works tech support anywhere I've ever experienced solely for the money. Generally, you are in tech support because you are just entering the tech field, and you need a jumping off point. If someone shows any promise and has stayed over a year, typically they are yanked off the phones to do something else anyway.

  33. Re:Apple? by psyconaut · · Score: 2

    No, none of those companies have anything like the brand that Apple have.

    Microsoft has similar brand awareness, so do Coca Cola and Pepsi. But only the cola companies can claim brand loyalty as strong as Apple.

    There's been several papers written on Apple's brand loyalty ("cult of Macintosh"). Go read one....it's a fascinating socio-techno phenomenon.

    -psyco

  34. Apple Tech Support is really good by Tyrone+Slothrop · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Recently, I had a very subtle problem with airport on my pismo g3. Not one but two apple support people helped me with the problem. They were courteous and patient.

    And yes, it was not an obvious problem by a long shot, dealing with how an update handed obsolete names of some computers on the network. They were very competent troubleshooters and they finally solved the problem.

    Since I make a point of complaining when service is bad, I thought it only fair to send an email to them praising the service. I received a kind, personal, reply from the tech support supervisor.

    Apple's got my business for as long as they like.

  35. More kudos to Apple ... anyone with bad stories? by jolshefsky · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I dare ye to compare this to any other company's support story: I bought a PowerBook G3 in 2000. After a couple months the hard drive started going bad (heavy clicking, and not to do with what I was downloading...) Anyway, I thought I could expedite things by having them send me a new hard drive. No dice--I'd have to send the whole laptop back to Apple. Great, I thought.

    On Monday afternoon I called them and they said they'd send me an overnight shipping package.

    Tuesday, mid-day, an Airborne Express box was sitting on my porch. I packed the machine and brought it to the Airborne office for shipping.

    Wednesday, I check the website and my machine arrived in the morning, has been fixed and is being shipped out in the afternoon.

    Thursday, mid-day, an Airborne Express box is on my porch with my laptop with a new hard drive.

    Time from problem discovery to problem resolution: 70 hours. Cost to me: $0. (Well, I did miss out on the $200 rebate offer when I bought it by one friggin' day ... darn you Apple--why won't you be nice and give it to me anyway? why? Oh ... sorry ... )

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  36. Hyundai warantee by mks113 · · Score: 1

    A reason for this -- customer confidence. People have heard so much about expensive breakdowns that Hyundai has to put on the good warantie to let people know that "breakdowns will be on us".

    I refused extended warantee on my Hondas. From experience I know that the chance of an expensive breakdown is far less than the cost of the warantee.

    1. Re:Hyundai warantee by ksheff · · Score: 1

      I had a Hyundai and a Mitsubishi (same car different name plates) for over 7 years. They had close to 200,000 miles on them, used one of them about like a truck (pulling trailers, hauling lots of stuff in the hatch, etc.), and never had a problem with them. The biggest repair was the periodic timing belt replacement.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  37. Re:Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to have misinterpreted the "computer company" part of the rhetoric. Since nVidia, Matrox, Intel, AMD are component manufacturers it is not a valid comparison. Try tossing out examples like Compaq, Gateway, Dell, HP, Packard Bell (BWUHAHAHAH!), etc., and you get a more valid comparison. In that case, I think the rhetoric works rather well.

  38. Dell UK by MiniChaz · · Score: 1

    My advice is to avoid buying from Dell UK unless you can get by with out _any_ technical support. They are really, really bad.

    My Dad bought a laptop from them (at my recomendation to my eternal shame) and it came without the restore disk we requested. The disk appeared on the email order confirmation but not on the hardcopy invoice that arrived with the PC.

    To cut a long story short, after 5 attempts to get the disk sent to us including a conversation with one of the "customer care" managers, we still have no disk. Being bounced around between about 50 people and then cut off is the plot of the average call. They are useless.

    Its been so much hasle that we have given up.

    On the otherhand, if you never need to speak to them, their laptops are excellent. :o)

  39. you're right, but then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I wouldn't expect the same performance from a comparable PC at half the cost, either.

  40. Apple had better have the best support... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    Who else are you going to go to if you can't get your Mac working?

    Seriously, it shouldn't be too hard for them to provide damn good support considering that they have complete control over the specifications of the hardware *and* the operating system.

    You can't run into the sort of situation where Compaq blames Microsoft, Microsoft says it's Mitsumi's fault, and Mitsumi blames Compaq, and you're a ping pong ball going back and forth between everyone. With Apple, the buck stops in exactly one place (unless you're dealing with a 3rd party application).

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Apple had better have the best support... by pzul · · Score: 1

      Exactly. PC support has to deal with billions of possible hardware&driver configurations, five or six operating systems. Apple support is a simpler problem space.

  41. Re:Dell buys adds = Dell gets press by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

    I know you're talking about the News.com article. But, just to clarify, the article is based on the Consumer Reports survey. Consumer Reports doesn't take advertising to avoid the kind of potential conflicts you're talking about.

  42. An analogy by Nomd · · Score: 0
    a Consumer:
    • is feeling broke
    • is realizing what they should have spent their money on
    • is beginning to wonder if they really need the item they received from the large corporation.

    a Constituant:
    • is feeling broke
    • is realizing what they could have spent their money on
    • is beginning to wonder if they really need the nothingness they received from the large government.

    a Technical Support Representative:
    • has talked to so many people... they all blend together
    • has no idea what the persons problem really is
    • is making ~ $30,000/year (???)

    a U.S. House Representative:
    • has talked to so many people... they all blend together
    • has no idea what the persons problem really is
    • is making ~ $133,600/year

    Just pay tech. support representatives $133,600 a year and consumers will tolerate the problems from the large corporation! Heck, if they are good enough, they won't even have to give them a product before long.
  43. Re:How can they rate ?! by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    Hey-ho, PC is not limited to only IBM-PCs and their clones, as someone wisely pointed out. Look around ;-)

  44. Pooooooooor by ganiman · · Score: 0

    That article kinda sucked. Not many details or anything. It said Apple was on top, but then I felt like the rest of it was about Dell and what they are doing to make their support better. Crap if you ask me. I bet the poll taken from the Consumer Reports web site isn't all that accurate either. Hell, if the link to the poll were posted on /. then the poll would have definatly been bogus because we all would have gone their, voted up for who we liked best, then gone back and voted down for everyone else.

    --
    geek n performer who performs morbid or disgusting acts, as biting off the head of a live chicken
  45. I love Dell, but... by Astrorunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I swear, they can be complete idiots sometimes.

    We purchased a dozen or so LCD monitors from Dell, to go with some of our existing, but still new ( 1 year old ) Dell desktops. One of them had two horizontal lines running through the screen, at about 1/3 and 2/3 of the way down.

    This line was present both when it was hooked up to the computer, and during the self test when powered on by itself.

    The guy on the phone kept insisting that I swap out the video card, just to be sure. Obviously, if it happens when its not even connected to the system, its not a problem with the system.

    Another time, fairly recently, I called up to get a replacement fan for the back of the cpu, as it had been whining incessantly (much like I'm doing now).

    "How did you determine the problem is with the fan?"

    "Uh, I used my ear."

    I guess I really can't fault them -- it's apparent they're working off scripts and trouble shooting diagrams. Always get my replacement parts the next day though. Best thing about Dell :)

    1. Re:I love Dell, but... by headchimp · · Score: 1
      Yep, Dell has a bunch of script monkeys working for them.

      I used to do Dell support back when it was outsourced to places like Stream. They would hire anyone off the street, didn't matter if they spoke English or not, as long as they could follow a flowchart and script

  46. Dell Support by bembleton · · Score: 1
    I bought a dell desktop in 98 and beat the crap out of the poor thing for at least 2 years. I even shorted out the board once but luckily it still worked. I overclocked it (SL2W8), added ram, hard drive, videoa card, blah blah, and nothing ever went wrong to the point of calling customer support. Or at least no hardware failures.

    Everyone else in my family bought Dells, too. And they have all had to call customer support at least once for hardware failures. From what they told me, the only way a customer can get replacements is to blantantly ignore what the service tech tells em to do.

    So the mother board is fried? Ok, so does Windows start?
    No, the motherboard is fried. The computer doesn't start.
    Ok, is the computer plugged in?
    Hmm, gee. I would never have thought of that, let me check YES it's plugged in.
    Alright, when you start the computer, press Control-Delete to enter the BIOS menu
    Ok, I might be able to do that if you send me a working motherboard.
    Sir, i can't send you a motherboard until you press Control-Delete
    Okay, whatever... I'm pressing Control-Delete now
    .....
    continues for about 15 minutes or until tech gets tired of talking and just sends the part

    All in all, I was very satisfied with Dell hardware and the fact I never had to call support. Considering that I would know as much or more than the person on the other line, I find tech support to be more of a comedic relief than anything else. Not only will you eventually get a new part, but you get to make fun of the guy on the phone and their crappy advice. I just might start calling tech support more often ...

  47. AppleCare by himself · · Score: 1

    I bought an iMac with a CRT this Summer, and I fully expected the analog video board to crap out -- which it did, less than a week before the complimentary 90 days of phone support ran out.
    I called, got a case number and approval for a warranty repair [which I _know_ lasts a year, four times the free phone help], and then mailed in my AppleCare subscription card.
    Why? Because three years worth of hardware support is worth it to me; while I used to do hardware support for these machines myself, I simply can't get the parts from Apple at all, much less have them installed & tested for free.
    The service place called two days ago with an ETA for my repaired system, and Apple called last night to tell me that my free support was about to run out -- and would I be interested in buying some more?

  48. It was an online poll by JohnTheFisherman · · Score: 2

    You do the math.

    I've never ever ever ever ever seen links in enthusiast message boards or mailing lists telling people to go to some website and vote for their favorite computer/band/whatever either, but I'm sure this particular poll is 100% accurate. ;-)

  49. OS X and BSD Tech support by vcbumg2 · · Score: 1

    With the Apple move to OS X How do they still manage to keep the best tech support when unix based OS X would be new to support staff ? It has to do with how much a company spends on support. Codeman

    --

    projects @ http://spectechnologies.net

  50. Apple's support is good, but... by Arkham · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had an odd failure on my iBook. Somehow I managed to snap off the male plug end of the battery charger INSIDE the female power connector of the iBook. The 'book was under warranty, but past the 90 days of free phone support.

    This was obviously a hardware problem, but the tech was not able to even discuss it with me without a credit card number. He told me that if it was a hardware problem I would not be charged, but if it were a software problem I would.

    I explained that there was no way that it could be a software problem since it was a physical plug not going into a physical hole because a physical piece broke off.

    Long story short, I had to give my card number (was not charged), they sent me an Airborne box, which I filled with my iBook and gave back to the guy who was dropping it off. They had to wait for a part so it took a week to get it back, but all is well with it now.

    I just thought it was funny that even Apple has some strange policies in their tech support department.

    --
    - Vincit qui patitur.
    1. Re:Apple's support is good, but... by ibennetch · · Score: 1

      that's actually not such an odd problem. At the school district where I work, we had to return several computers with that exact problem. Granted, the high school students are probably less careful than you.
      Apples's been great to us, we've had a number of problems and our support's always been excellent (although I haven't dealt directly with them).

  51. Tech Support by Quill_28 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know why tech support sucks?

    Because people will not pay for it. Margins are too low for companies to give good tech support. Consumers are only looking at prices/features not how good their tech support is. Who here is going to pay an extra $100 to $200 a year just for good tech support? Not many. Businesses are different, but most consumers are not going to pay the money to get good tech support.

  52. Dell asked for it by gosand · · Score: 2
    Dell is just asking for customer service nightmares when they market their PCs the way they do. They want to be the largest supplier of complex machines, running a confusing and unstable operating system, to a population of people where computer literacy is low? Everyone gets a Dell! Good luck.

    I don't know about these numbers, and what they really reflect. They reflect satisfaction, and hopefully just with the service and not the consumers frustration with computers in general, which could easily creep into the customer's feelings. It almost seems like it should be broken out into the customer's experience with computers, because that can determine how a "problem" is perceived. Both of these descriptions could or could not be describing the same problem:
    1. My NIC is not working. The light doesn't light, and I am using DHCP to get an IP. I have another PC on my network configured the same way and it doesn't have any problem. I have even tried a known working cable.

    2. The internet is broken.

    Of course, one problem is easy to work with, the other one could be a nightmare. I'll bet Dell gets a lot of #2.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  53. Choose your support wisely... by d_force · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When you purchase a system from one of these large companies, you generally have options for tech support.. they company may not list it, but they're there.

    For example, when I purchased my Dell system, I purchased it through my university (works if you buy through your business too), and as such, I was given the option of having 5yr premium tech support (5yr full, 24/7).. I can't remember what the exact service agreement stated, but at the time, Dell used a 3rd party company for its high-end support contracts named "Wang" (.. there's probably more to that name, but that's all i can remember right now).

    Bottom line: If I had any problem whatsoever (or even *think* I was having a prob w/ the system), I'd call up the 800 number -- forwarding me to the Tier 3 tech support guy -- and say "look, component X has just failed, I want a replacement here in 24 hrs." Sure enough, the part would arrive; I'd send to defective part back to them in the same box -- no cost to me.

    Lesson: Don't just roll over and save the extra $25 if you're concerned about support to begin with... Oh, and buying it through a large organization helps. ;)

    --
    SELECT * FROM USERS WHERE A_WINNER = "YUO";
    1. Re:Choose your support wisely... by headchimp · · Score: 1

      They use Wang, Unisys and Banctec as their 3rd party onsite providers

  54. The headline tells it all... by MarvinMouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Customers Unhappy with PC Support

    And this is new... how?

    Here's some more good headlines for CNet

    Grass is coloured Green
    Sky is blue
    Microsoft earns another billion dollars
    CNet runs out of good stories

    (I have been on computers since 1987, customers have always been unhappy with customer support.)

    --
    ~ kjrose
  55. dell warranty by evilempireinc · · Score: 1

    If you can get the onsite service warranty for free (not sure what their deals are now) I would certainly recommend it. The mouse on my laptop broke and they had somebody come out the next day and replace it. That being said, as soon as the warranty expired the 8, i, k, and , keys on my keyboard started working intermittently, so make of that what you will

    --
    we can rebuild this sig. we have the technology
    1. Re:dell warranty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok call me crazy but this com is a dell and guess what keys go out regular

  56. Consumer vs. Business by kyoko21 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Though my subject is consumer vs. business, it is in regards to the type of support line you get thrown into. I have a Gateway at home, and I bought this machine back in december of 98, right when the dual 450's mother boards started shipping. I had purchased this box but, it was considered a business line workstation. Plus, it came with 3 years warranty. I have had to call them up twice regarding my SCSI CDROM dying on me. (I don't think the plextor scsi cdrom i have likes the 80min cdrs...i'm digressing) Both times, that I have called, the support has always been excellent, and the staff was highly technical (and they were females, too...kudos!) None, the less, I always explained to them what was going on, and they have never given me much trouble. They have sent me two replacement drives, and this last one is still working. (Whew!)

    I think perhaps that the article is decent, but it does not paint a clear picture. Perhaps, the various vendors of computers have separate groups of customer support, and i would not be surprised if the ones for the business side of things were much more technical than the consumer side. For example, Compaq has always made great business class machines and servers. But I wouldn't put my money in their consumer side products... that's just me though.

  57. I've had good luck with dell, notcompaq or gateway by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

    I used to be a warranty guy for compaq, hp, ibm and apple(I know, BFD, I realize it doesn't mean squat. In fact I'm scared to say that most of the time because I look like more of a fool than a computer guy! But we gotta start somewhere.). I rarely called apple, because most of the apples I worked on had the power button bug, in which the power button stuck down after turning it on, and then the computer would mysteriously shut down after 8 seconds on the imac. I did like 50 in one week, but my limited experience with apple was about the best I had had with any support provider at the time. Then I moved, got another job, and they had dells here. I disliked dells, but only because I had worked on very few and I was more unfamiliar than unimpressed. Shortly after I started, a HDD died on someone's dell machine. I remembered the hell with compaq about trying to convince them that the hdd was bad, and it was under warranty. I immediatley suggested to my boss we should just buy another hdd (~$80) and forget about it. He told me I should just call Dell. So I called them, waited two minutes on hold. Told the guy about the windows 2000 event logs saying bad block on hd0 and how scan disk takes 2 hours every boot. He had me push some f(#) key on boot, and it started some diagnostics (I've never believed in those built in diagnostics either) and about 60 seconds later it said hdd 0 and an error code. I read the code to the tech, he said ok we'll have a new hdd out to you soon. The next morning there a new hdd in my box. I will never go back to anything else! About the same experience with a fan, called dell, easy hold, could convince him it was bad, had a new one the next day. Apple also did the same, new parts within a day. I still have a 64mb stick of ram acting as a partial paper weight from a friends machine because gateway won't replace it without me bringing it into a country store, letting them format the hdd and put windows 98 back on it, then testing it. I firmly believe that hardware rarely goes bad, unlike most tech support would like you to beleive, and this is one of the only sticks of ram in my 5 years that I can confidently say is bad.

  58. Bad users vs. Bad Tech Support by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    A good tech support person can handle bad users. Yes, sometimes you have to put them on hold for a while 'till they calm down some, but there's normally other tricks that you can use to make sure you don't make things worse.

    For instance, making comments about user's sexual encounters when you're working in the bible belt is just right out. [but well, I've seen it done].

    NEVER talk down to the customer. I mean, even if it's someone that 500 people have called with before, it's a new problem TO THEM. Yes, you can give them the answer and hang up on them, but if you say 'I just had someone call in with this a few minutes ago-- Why don't you try ...' it comes off as more personal, you tell the person that they're not the only one having this problem [ie, they're not an idiot], etc.

    Finding people with the right personality for doing helpdesk is normally harder than finding someone who knows the technical information. And well, if you don't have good management, they don't pull people as they're getting burned out, and it makes things harder on everyone. [Getting a reputation as having bad service because of one dumbass pisses you off, and if the customer had last talked to that dumbass, they're more likely to be beligerant when calling you, which can also piss you off, overall in driving down the quality of service which you give, etc.]

    Just because the customer doesn't know the answer doesn't mean they're an idiot. They could be a plumber, auto mechanic, doctor, or someone else with specialized knowledge that differed from yours. Personally, if I were going in to get my car fixed, I care about if they know my model of car, I couldn't care less if they knew how to plug in a computer, much less use one. I'm not going to hold it against my dental hygenist that she accidentally infected her system with a virus, but I would be annoyed if she didn't do her job.

    That's not to say that there aren't rude people out there who will always get bad service. I had someone call me up when I worked at my university's helpdesk in 1994, and she wanted to know what her monitor's resolution was. [Mind you, we were software support for the computer labs, but our department was "Technical Assistance". After I tried to explain to her that she needed to talk to whomever sold her the computer, she said something to the equivalent of 'I called Technical Assistance, and this is a technical question, so I expect a f**king answer'. I passed her along to my manager, as well, it well, that's what managers are for.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Bad users vs. Bad Tech Support by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      I see what you are saying, and as I mentioned, it is a problem which goes two ways. And the customer isn't necessarily an idiot for not knowing the answer, but it is frustrating to try to help people who are convinced that they are right and have the answer to everything (only they can't figure out the problem for some strange reason), and blow their anger all over someone who is there to help. It has been said that "the customer is always right", but more often than not, it looks like the more angry the customer is, the less he knows about what's going on, and is usually wrong on all accounts.

      Tech support people are supposed to deal with that, but they are only human after all. Those who contact tech support should consider that. But people are generally ignorant and can't see further than the inside of their own eye lids...

      If only people realized that being nice gets them so much further... And if only techs could reset their brains from time to time to forget the last idiot who called and yelled at them for something which was actually their own fault ;-)

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  59. apple doesn't care by westcourt_monk · · Score: 1
    ummm apple care does not cover a whole lot.

    For example, my Tibook G4 400 has a broken front latch (the thing that holds the monitor down). Apple care would not cover it and apple wanted to charge me $1000 CDN to fix it.

    I told them duct tape will do and called customer service. They of course offered to fix it for free - "but only this one time." Since it is a crappy part it will break again.

    My question to apple, don't you thinkg a $5000 CDN laptop deserves a better warrenty??? If dell still shipped with Red Hat, that would be my next laptop.

    --
    I am going to hell and I am going to take all of you with me.
    1. Re:apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I had a the top of a key break on my PB G4 400. I called them asking for a new key, they sent me a new keyboard and didn't even want to old one back. I never even got Applecare, just had the 1yr warranty.

  60. Re:Apple? by DrVxD · · Score: 2

    > What other computer company creates actual 'brand loyalty' like Apple?
    Commodore, Atari?

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  61. I'm not blaming Dell for trying to detect fraud... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1
    I have no problem with them trying to detect fraud. Although in reality, it's the card issuer's problem since they imposed the limit.

    The issue is that they e-mailed me with options on how to fix the problem. The method that would have worked fine in my case was changing my payment method to online check.

    However, with their sh(odd/itt)y customer support, I never even got to the point over the phone when that became an option. They merely shuffled me around.

    Maybe it's just me, but one would think they'd be a little more careful with a customer in the situation I was in.

    --
    -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
  62. Compaq was doing something similar to me by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Funny

    There was a batch of Deskpros which had faulty video cards. They would work fine when new, but over time the BIOS would leak power until one day you switched on and, well, it didn't switch on. You got the beep sequence informing you, "Dude, you're getting no video!". Once that happened, you were out of luck and had to RMA the card. Eventually they came out with a "patch" -- if you can consider a small Windows program which bleeps the BIOS every 24 hours to refresh the video card information a legitimate patch -- but it was useless if your card had already died.

    I had a client who'd bought a batch of 70 or so and was rolling them out in lots of five at a time. Hence, every few weeks, we'd have to call Compaq and RMA the video card. Well, naturally, we had to go through the diagnostics. Even though this was a well-known and documented issue, and even though the beep sequence said exactly what was happening, and even though you would tell Compaq you'd gone through the diagnostics, you had to do it while the Compaq tech was on the line.

    So eventually I figured out how to do this.

    Compaq tech: "Okay, switch out the video card with a known good card and check it boots up with that one, then replace the original and see if you still have the same problem."

    Me: wait for 15 seconds doing nothing, then, "Okay, done that. The other card worked fine, but I still have the same problem with the original."

    Compaq tech: "Gosh, that was quick."

    Me: "Yes, well, I'm, err, used to doing this by now."

    Compaq tech: "Okay. Well then...um, let's reset the motherboard BIOS by..."

    Me: "...switching over Jumper A17, powering up for 20 seconds, then turning it off and switching back, yeah, I know. Hang on a minute."

    Sit for another 30 seconds doing nothing.

    "Okay, done that, same problem."

    Compaq tech: "Wow, you're really quick on this stuff!"

    Me: "Yeah, well, I play the piano, I have good dexterity."

    Compaq tech: "Oh..."

    Quite efficient, I think: if you just pretend to do what they're asking instead of actually doing it, it goes much more quickly. This is good, right? You cut down on the call time, save the client time and money, and don't tie up the Compaq tech line either, so they're getting better call times -- yay, everyone wins!

    You just had to make sure you paused long enough to make it sound plausible. No good coming back after five seconds claiming to have replaced the video card, booted up into Windows, shut down, and switched in the original video card, as well as having done a complete NT installation on the side. But there was one tech who I spoke with quite often, and he soon figured out what was going on. Fortunately, he also figured out I had at least half a clue, and if he played along it'd cut down his call times.

    They have to go through the charade, poor buggers; almost feel sorry for them sometimes.

    1. Re:Compaq was doing something similar to me by rob+colonna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "if you just pretend to do what they're asking instead of actually doing it, it goes much more quickly. "

      Well, it sounds as if you know what you're doing, but what about those who don't? There are a lot of people who call tech support who want a quick, easy fix, that do just what you describe; pretend to do something, lie and say it didn't work, and then call back (usually in 10 minutes, especially when the procedure you gave them should take 30.). Why? What good does that do them? Well, in my case, it usually means they want me to fix their files, or they want an excuse to complain. In the case of hardware support, i can only assume it's the latter, or that they are intimidated.

      Snarky comments and the continuing stereotype of tech support people as minimum-wage or ignorant really makes our job tougher, needlessly. Sure, the stereotype is right in some places. But what about the legions of knowledgeable support staff who can no longer do their job, because the customers on the other end are sometimes preconditioned to assume that they will get no help, and just biding time until they can escalate the call to a manager.

      We cannot help those who do not wish to be helped.

    2. Re:Compaq was doing something similar to me by kiwimate · · Score: 2

      I know, and I agree with pretty much everything you've written. I have been on both ends of tech support for several years now, and I've certainly had the clients who ask me for an answer and tell me I'm wrong when I give it to them, the clients who tell me they've done something when it's blatantly obvious they haven't, the clients who tell me they got an error message but clicked Ignore and everything seemed to be okay but it doesn't work and no, of course they didn't write down the error message, why would they -- get the picture? I've been there, done that.

      My current position has me working as a consultant in a very high-end specialized niche market, which means I often must do phone-line tech support because it's frankly very difficult to find tech support in this market. I've also been at the opposite end: where I've installed highly-specialized software that I've never seen before, ended up having to call tech support two weeks into the project, have an engineer tell me how to fix the problem, and been compelled to explain to him why his suggestion will result in data loss when it becomes apparent that my two weeks' experience in the product and ability to actually read the manual trumps his four weeks' training period and two months' experience on the front lines. And that, my friend, is more a sad indictment on the quality of orientation and training programs that most companies provide for their tech support engineers than on the capabilities of the technicians who may well be just as frustrated as me.

      My post was written tongue-in-cheek, and was about a specific scenario where the precise problem was well known, there was a simple procedure to confirm it was indeed that problem, and I was frequently talking to a technician who felt the same as me but was compelled to run the script anyway. It's about the silly policies of the companies, and it's about the frustration that all techs feel when we get stuck in these loops. We're notoriously impatient, and we disdain those of inferior capabilities.

      Hey -- it's Friday. I hope you're not working the weekend shift, but at the very least you've apparently got a paying job and you're able to read Slashdot and make some posts, so you've got it easier than some poor blighters. There's always a bright side somewhere.

    3. Re:Compaq was doing something similar to me by rob+colonna · · Score: 1

      Right, i didn't intend to imply that you didn't understand, simply that your story illustrated something that really does cause a lot of trouble.

      Naturally, not all support staff is competent or good. i've worked with some, and even been the stereotypical ignoramus-with-a-headset (once or twice). Regardless, even many of those who are not so well-informed probably are still trying their darnedest.

      As for the 'script-readers', it's true that that's an indictment more of their organization than it is them, and the people on the phones probably take the heat for it. Based on my experience, it's counter-productive to minimize knowledge; the way we operate here is to share it, tell everyone that asks, so that we don't have to figure out the same thing twice. That's the key; if you don't know, someone does, and has written it down 95% of the time. Scripts aren't conducive to that, and maybe that's one of the keys to a competent support organization.

      it's quite true that it's nice to be able to read /. ot work occasionally; it's perfect reading for waiting for calls to come in, so, there's a new sought-after career choice for slashdot addicts...

    4. Re:Compaq was doing something similar to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And that, my friend, is more a sad indictment on the quality of orientation and training programs that most companies provide for their tech support engineers than on the capabilities of the technicians who may well be just as frustrated as me."

      And a big AHMEN!. That's truer than many people suppose. One company I use to work for. Their training was literally seat of the pants. Later it was a couple of hours in a room with some explanations, and a lot of Q & A. Nothing more embarassing than the company selling a new product and you not even knowing about it untill a customer called in with a problem. A lot of the older products didn't have documentation, or it consisted of what a previous tech had scribbled down from looking at a unit in the field. I kid you not.

      My last year it was better but by then burnout was the greater worry.

  63. Dude, you're gettin' Dell tech support by blinkylights · · Score: 2, Informative

    People who expect to mail-order a home PC from one of the big vendors, then get decent tech support are like people who order a Big Mac, and expect to get an attractive, witty wait-person who comes to their table, remembers their name and can suggest a good merlot to go with that. It's just not going to happen.

    Back in the day, I paid my tech support dues at an ISP at around the time that a lot of people were getting interested in the Internet. Most people had Win3.1 and 14.4 modems, and most of them knew approximately diddly about what an ISP was or what their monthly fees were paying for. ("Modem? What's that? Nobody told me I had to buy a whatever-you-call-it... I want my money back!"). We tried to help EVERYBODY who called, whether it was a simple password change, or the dreaded "I just installed Win95, now I can't get connected" call. If the call took 2 hrs, it took 2 hrs, and if we couldn't help them on the first call, we would call them back later with some kind of answer.

    The result was that when this ISP I worked for lowered the monthly fee from $35 to $25/mo (for dial-up, yeah you read that right), our regular customers complained (!) because they were worried that we were going to turn into just another one of those cheap ISP's with crappy tech support. After all, they knew perfectly well that if they wanted bad service, they could use one of those 3.5" AOL floppies they got in the mail every week and pay less.

    Point is, support is expensive. HP, Dell, et al, just can't sell you a $500 PC, then teach you how to use it for free. You ought to be able to get someone on the phone when you get your new Dell home and the HD won't spin up, but people call tech support indignantly resolute in their belief that their $500 has earned them the right to expect Dell to teach them how to create a desktop shortcut... which means that legitimate support needs just have to wait.

    When people ask me whether they should get a Dell or a Compaq or whatever, I tell them that there are several reputable, LOCAL shops that can put together a PC for them and support it. It costs more, but as always, you get what you pay for.

  64. Another Universal Truth by hellfire · · Score: 1

    Common sense isn't very common.

    My company sells accounting software. It's assumed that those who buy our software have accounting knowledge. You'd be surprised how many people call me up to simply try to get me to do their job. I also wouldn't be surprised if people call up never having seen a computer before and now that they have one, they didn't bother to attend a basic computer skills class and expect support to train them

    You'd also be surprised (maybe you wouldn't) at the number of times you ask a person to be logical and they aren't. Support reps may also be domain experts, but they have a tendency (not always I admit) to be more logical thinkers than the customers.

    And finally, you'd be surprised at the number of times people call up to bitch because things don't go their way and they try to screw the company out of something because they want a free lunch or something.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  65. Consumer Reports by speleo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah, yes, Consumer Reports. Quite the oracle of knowledge on computers. For example, in their latest issue they thought the iMac was "annoying" because it didn't come with a built-in floppy drive. What in the world would they do with a floppy drive, anyway? Oh, and Macs are too expensive, too. I like how they thought the "control buttons" on the Apple Studio Display were hard to use. I suppose that's true, especially since it doesn't have any--it's software controlled.

    But in the same issue they think the Chevy Avalanche is a better "truck" then the base model Ford and Dodge pickups they tested it against. Of course, this time the nearly $8k price difference didn't seem to bother them much...

  66. PC Tech support call (almost true story) by MrNovember · · Score: 3, Funny

    User: 5
    User: 3
    User: #
    User: 9
    User: 9
    User: 4
    User: 0

    Tech Support: All technicians are busy. We value your business. Please continue to wait. ...20 minutes later...

    Tech Support: Hello, how can I help you?

    User: About a minute after booting up, my computer freezes with a blinking cursor in the corner.

    Tech Support: Sir, can you check your power cord? Is it plugged into the wall?

    User: Yes, as I said, when I turn it on it freezes up.

    Tech Support: Is your computer turned on?

    User: Yes.

    Tech Support: Is your monitor plugged into both the wall and your computer?

    User: Of course.

    Tech Support: Is your monitor turned on?

    User: Yes yes. That's not the problem.

    Tech Support: I see. Do you have your support CD?

    User: Yes.

    Tech Support: Ok, insert your support CD and press the reset button.

    User: Ok.

    Tech Support: You should see our logo and several choices.

    User: Alright there they are.

    Tech Support: Press the one called Reformat and Reinstall Operating System.

    User: Uhh...Won't that remove all of my stuff? I mean can't you help me figure the problem out?

    Tech Support: Your problem can't be solved without reinitializing your system.

    User: But it starts up ok and works for a while.

    Tech Support: Sir, can you check your power cord? Is it plugged into the wall?

    1. Re:PC Tech support call (almost true story) by headchimp · · Score: 1
      That is so true!!!!!!!!!!!

      Place I work took on a crappy contract for People PC machines and that is what they do when people call in for support. Although you left out a little, like have the user flip the power select switch in the back and swap the power cord from the monitor and try it again.

      If all that (restore including) doesn't resolve it, then the machine will be set up for depot repair. And yes the customer will be without a machine for about a month and when/if they get it back, the problem will not be resolved, they will get someone else machine back or something else will be broken.

  67. Re:Tech Support by Kazimira · · Score: 1

    Agreed!
    Whether it be a computer manufacturer or an ISP, Tech Support is a liability to the bottom line. If you have a shitty product or a large customer base, you need more techs on the phones, which means you pay less in salaries, which leads to your quality of service going down the tubes. You can't afford to keep the good techs around so they move off to better paying jobs and you're left with filling the holes with unqualified people.
    I'm a supervisor in a tech call center and I can tell you that the pressure I get daily is to churn the calls out quickly and make some sales.
    Keep those hold times and handle times low or else.
    Sell or upsell this or that product.
    Hell, these are techs, not salesmen. If they wanted to be in sales they would be working at Best Buy or CompUSA.
    Consideration to quality comes way down on the list.

  68. Re:Dell buys adds = Dell gets press by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    It's because Dell is in too much of a hurry. At Apple, the tech sup is more laid back.

  69. Call me back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The best thing I loved about Apple's Customer Service, is that when I called, the lady asked me my name and then asked for my phone number so she could call me back just in case we got disconnected. Do you believe that? I can't remember the number of times that I've been disconnected on Customer Service lines, but for once someone got it right.

    If they disconnect you, then they should call you back.

    Thanks Apple!

    1. Re:Call me back! by madmancarman · · Score: 2
      The best thing I loved about Apple's Customer Service, is that when I called, the lady asked me my name and then asked for my phone number so she could call me back just in case we got disconnected. Do you believe that? I can't remember the number of times that I've been disconnected on Customer Service lines, but for once someone got it right.

      I was working on an IBM Netfinity Server once and the very first thing IBM's support asked me was for my name and phone number so they could call me back, so I think this is becoming standard among the industry leaders.

      In fact, after resolving the problem (Windows 2000 crashing due to the NIC and some service pack nonsense), they called back a week later to make sure everything was still working so that they could close the support ticket. They were also very nice and knowledgable (once you got to level 3). Pretty impressive.

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi

      --
      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. -- Gandhi
  70. Total Rubbish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently your experience is dated:
    http://www.consumerreports.org/main/detail v2.jsp?C ONTENT%3C%3Ecnt_id=160105&FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=21 135&bmUID=1028839979891
    Dell makes a pretty reliable machine with Apple a very close 2nd.
    Also your view of the PowerBooks was accurate, but again dated. The 520! My God, how long has it been since you've seen the new ones?
    General rule with computers: 18 months and re-evaluate FROM SCRATCH. If the vendor isn't cutting it, cut them.

  71. Re: by ianscot · · Score: 1
    So we exclude Apple customers because their zealous, evangelistic user population will skew the results? Isn't the presence of that user population part of the results?

    Hey, I wonder how the population at Slashdot would feel about being ruled out of an analogous survey about OSes due to the number of "enthusiasts" in the crowd. Those results can't be reliable, because Linux-friendly folks like their OS and want to evangelize for it. Better keep them out of the survey, as a control measure. Hey, look, Windows Me wins again! (We've already tossed those Apple zealots out of the data pool, naturally.)

    I've dealt with Apple's help. They used to basically give you a free ride for years with their phone advice line, up until 1993 or so. You could call about defunct machines from years back. Nice perk. We had some shoddy problems with the first generation Power PC (5300?) powerbooks at an old job -- those machines were a piece of work, one of the worst releases of the Gil Amelio era -- but the support line was quite responsive. We got swapped parts for a laptop in two days: ship overnight to Apple in CA from MN, they replace and test it, ship back to us, all shipping and parts paid by Apple -- after the warranty had expired, because it was a recognized problem with the model.

    I personally haven't called the line in a few years, and my impression is they've cut the default warranty to 90 days to push you to the "AppleCare" thing. But no, it shouldn't surprise you to see them up on these lists. They've been there for a long time, and it's not because Mac users are blind fools. That's wishful thinking on your part, not the Mac zealots'. You pay for it, but Apple does deliver in this way.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  72. hmmm by Worf+Maugg · · Score: 1

    http://www.bmug.org/news/articles/MSvsPF.html

  73. Consumers arent the only ones mad at manufacturers by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

    I am a Computer Repair Tech. My co-workers and I have noticed that the quality of the hardware the major manufacturers are making, and the quality of their support have gone to hell. Their products are made to be thrown away, like American cars in the '70s. Their help desk people are just reading off of their screens, and don't even understand what they are reading. When we have to call "the new HP" for example, we have gotten "Hello, my name is operator." They read that off the screen, and can't even insert their name. Having to call the manufacturers to get authorization, or for any reason makes us wonder why we ever got into this racket.

    --
    How ya like dat?
  74. Levels of Expertise by virg_mattes · · Score: 2

    > The consumer shouldn't be expected to have a clue. Or would you rather computers remained niche items owned only by the technological elite?

    Unfair assessment. One can be a regular consumer and still have a small clue, and it's reasonable to expect the customer to understand a few basics. After all, should someone who owns a car not be expected to understand the terms, "ignition", "steering wheel" and "driver's side"? While I accept that someone calling for technical support shouldn't have to understand installing drivers to get a device to work, when someone gets on the phone and doesn't understand what I mean when I say "double click" or turns off the monitor when I tell them to turn off the base unit, I have a right to complain when they say that I suck at supporting them. They don't have to know the intimate details of IRQs and BIOS configuration, but it's perfectly reasonable to expect them to know how to use the computer and understand the terms that are defined on the Quick Start card.

    Virg

  75. What did you expect? by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tech support operators are rewarded not for how well they solve a problem but for how quickly they clear the phone line (he with the most calls per hour wins). Beyond that, more and more PC companies practically hide their support phone number, instead trying to herd their customers into e-mailing over-generalized bots that pay almost as little attention to their customers as their phone support techies. And woe to the person who actually knows more than the average phone techie who has to call tech support.

    Customer satisfaction doesn't do much for profits one way or the other. Maintaining support facilities costs money, but the most money can be saved by getting people in and out as quickly as possible (satisfaction be damned). In the continuing quest of investors for the quick buck, is anybody really surprised by the amount of disdain the average computer manufacturer shows their customers?

  76. Re:More kudos to Apple ... anyone with bad stories by Graff · · Score: 2
    Time from problem discovery to problem resolution: 70 hours. Cost to me: $0.
    I have found Apple's laptop support to be just amazing. My sister had a Powerbook 5300cs, well-known in Mac circles to be a laptop which was plagued with problems. She had a problem with it, so I contacted Apple. It turns out that even though it was way out of warranty, Apple had indefinitely extended the warranty for the 5300 and they sent me a mailer. The mailer came the next day, I sent it out immediately and the laptop was back in 2 days. They not only replaced the motherboard, they also fixed a bad screen hinge and some parts on the case which had gotten badly scratched. In other words, they returned the laptop in near-new condition for no cost and in 3 days from start to finish. Totally cool.

    I've been hearing these kind of stories for years from other people who have had to contact Apple support. Sure they sometimes drop the ball, but it seems that it is rare that they do. Combine that with the fact that they are constantly on the cutting edge of technology in both software and hardware, it's not hard to see why they have such strong customer loyalty.
  77. Alienware by BdosError · · Score: 2

    As my URL above may suggest, I don't have anything good to say about Alienware's technical support. Site's down right now, but should be up later this weekend. And maybe I'll put up some of the other people's stories that I've received through the site as well. They suck. And blow.

    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  78. Dell billing by dinodriver · · Score: 1

    I bought a Dell, on a payment plan, and then returned it within 30 days because I convinced my employer that it would be good for me to have a Mac instead (I'm a designer) and therefore I decided to get a new Mac for home too instead of a PC. There was nothing I could do to keep them from sending me my monthly payment bill each month! Lots of phone calls and emails later and heck, they are probably still sending out a monthly bill to my old address 3 years later! It never showed a past due balance though which was curious. So...I don't know about their tech support, but their accounting folks could use a little help.

  79. Great post! by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Mod the Guy up! You're completely right: it is nice to compliment people on their niceness/serviability/correctness on the phone...but it is *better* to let their superiors know that they have a good guy/gal in their ranks.
    I'll most definately do that next time I have to call tech support and the service is good. Stupid I didn't think of it myself.

  80. Re:Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What other computer company creates actual 'brand loyalty' like Apple?"

    any of the culty ones...

  81. Gateway used to be... by Tevye · · Score: 1

    Gateway used to be great. Way back, about 9-10 years ago, we bought a 386 from them, that, as their standard was at that point, came with lifetime, yes, till you die, tech support. As I recall, this didn't come at an extra cost, and it certainly wasn't something for which we had to pay each year.

    But, even better than that, we got another from them, five or six years down the road. Unfortunatley this one didn't come with the same great service agreement. But, when we called up on account of a failed CDROM drive, becase of our older agreement, they extended the free service. They also shipped out the new drive very quickly. _And_ didn't even request the old one back. They were a bit more demanding when we had a problem with the monitor; they did ask for that back. However, the replacement was a nice change, they sort of 'upgraded' us from a 15" to a 17".

    Maybe Gateway is starting to fall behind, but it wasn't always so.

    And on that note about having parts fail, when I was in a high school which required laptops [and as provided by them] their last choice while I was there was this Acer notebook. My understanding was that the computer was a nice one, better than most previous models they'd chosen, but the LCD screens had a horrible tendency to crack. I worked with the school's IT/Support dept, and we saw more of "my screen has cracks in it" than anything else. Sad thing was, it's not hard to prevent, or be cautious, but point is, hardware problems aren't always the manufacturer's fault.

    Tevye

    --
    We're on a mission from God.
  82. Not on the list, but... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    My vote for worst customer support is Panasonic:

    My Panasonic Mini-DV camcorder apparently doesn't exist, and it's only 1.5 years old.

    The Panasonic CD-RW I got for my mother-in-laws friend wasn't supported by the Adaptec EasyCD it came bundled with (and it also, apparently, doesn't exist).

    My (ex)bosses' printer was the kicker, though. We upgraded all the computers to Win2k and needed drivers for it. It was a dot-matrix, so I didn't have high hopes, but they needed it to print payroll, so obviously it was a high priority job ;) I go to Panasonic's site, and it's listed on their support page, which totally shocks me since this is after the incidents with the CD-RW and Camcorder, and they even have a link and a filename. The link takes me to an FTP site (not to the file I needed, as it claimed it would) that doesn't have the driver I need. I try the one printer driver that is there, but obviously it doesn't work. After 2 hours on the phone alternating between being on hold and saying "I already tried that, it didn't work" to people with the IQ of mashed yams, I finally get transfered to a guy who's able to tell me where to find the drivers: on Panasonics Canadian site!

    In short, no more Panasonic for me, ever again.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  83. Re:Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Viva Amiga! Which I still use every day.

    ac

  84. Wang Computers by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
    Wang is a company that is (used to be?) based in Massachusetts. They've since gone under - I think - but we still have the Wang Theater and used to have the Wang Towers. You can read about them here, but that mostly talks about what's replaced Wang in the towers.

    This should be the same Wang - Wang was a word processor (as in the physical word processors with a little monochrome monitor attached to a typewritter) manufactorer and made some microcomputers, I think. But they missed out on the PC "revolution" and became a bit player. They eventually went bankrupt in the early 1990s, but apparently survived to as later as 1998.

    Wang seems to have been bought out/changed it's name to Getronics, but their webpage still exists.

    As far as I know, Wang is the name of the founder of the company - I don't remember which Asian nation he was from, but it's an Asian name. But yeah, Wang does seem like a weird name to use for a US company... :)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  85. Re:Dell buys adds = Dell gets press by jasonisgodzilla · · Score: 0

    I can tell you why DELL's numbers are slipping. I worked in tech support there for almost a year. Their numbers are slipping because they treat their employees like office furniture. They change your schedule every month to god know what, so you never work constant hours. They force you to take overtime, often to skip your lunch. They base everything on metrics, and even if you make 150% of your goal you still get told to do better. You cant even get up to piss without the queue nazis hunting you down to tell you to get back on the phone. You have no insurance and no benefits. They fire people for no reason whatsoever so you have no job security. No one ever gets moved up or gets a raise. They tell you to do everything you can to make sure the customer doesnt get parts and doesnt call back even if the customers machine is a piece of shit. They basically treat their employees like animals and as a result they have an extremely high burn out rate. The only reason it has ever been good is because lots of sys admins and engineers are out of work in Austin and have to take shit jobs to survive. Now all they have is techie wannabees. It's kind of hard to have good service when your company is staffed by people who have no past experience and who only last three months before quitting or getting fired for not being a fucking call taking machine. On top of that take low pay and even lower moral and you get crap service. But take heart, they are planning to outsource most of it to India so you will soon be getting very technical and experienced people who are completely arrogant and rude to take your calls!!!

  86. HP Tech Support by goodhell · · Score: 1

    My older brother recently bought himself a compter. A pretty nice one too. 2.2 GigHz 60, Gig HD, you know, nice computer. Well, something was wrong with it. He thought it was a problem with one of the applications that was preinstalled on his computer. The computer kept crashing everytime he tried to use Diablo or something (something that played well on his old Pentium 1) So he called up tech support for some help on his brand new computer.

    He explained what was wrong, or rather what the computer was not doing. In essence, they told him to piss off and call the software vendors, before he could even finish. They wouldn't even bother helping him. They said that it wasn't their problem. In turn, he told them that it was there problem because he'd just return their computer and then it would be their problem anyway. So, they called upper management and came back with a go-fuck-yourself reply.

    My brother took the computer back and exchanged it for another, albeit non-HP. This is a sweet machine, now I'll need to get a better computer just to show him up. It turns out that it was a hardware problem, the video card was fubar. And it became HP's problem anyway. (After talking to my brother for a few minutes about what was happening, I could tell that the video card was all fubar, but this all happened while I was on vacation.)

    Now my brother tells the lovely tech support story from HP to all his friends, family, strangers, etc. He'll never buy an HP product ever again.

    In my opinion, HP has lost a few customers in this display of their competence in dealing with people. My dad for instance is a very big consumer, now he'll never purchase a product from HP. And neither will I.

    My brother is not a techie, he's one of your average joe's. Knows about two things about computers: Jack Shit. If your tech support is going to treat people like this, you'll lose your business. Especially here in America. This isn't Russia where you have only one vendor, and you can treat everyone like shit. A business can afford to spend a few minutes walking through some questions with people to find out what the problem is. That's how you get repeat business and more customers.

  87. Re: Who w_a_s doing the support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple itself has always excelled at tech support -- from their toll free end-user phone support, to their "Service Source" materials for hardware repair tech's, to fostering User Groups that turned into self help communities, to their early adoption of web based support, it's always been the best of it's class, except for it glaring deficits in it support for the corporate IT world.

    I did phone based in-bound tech support for in the bad old days (back when Apple seemed to be releasing a new model every month & when support through 1-800-SOS-APPLE was considered free for the life of any Apple product). I was working for a undisclosed company that was 1 of 3 outsource venders in the US that Apple had doing most of the phone based support for them. We had good training, support, escalation procedures, and resources provide both by Apple and by the undisclosed company (how long are non-disclosure agreements good for anyway?).

    We were providing great service at our call centers (from the original 68000 Mac's to PPC 604 machines), even during a particularly difficult period where Apple officially denied a hardware defect on some of it's Performa models. Unfortunately, change happens.

    Around the time Steve Job's came back to Apple, Apple decided to move away from the free-for-life phone support model. Most unfortunate for my company, we were the first vender who's contract with Apple come up for renewal, so we were axed.

    You'd think that I might have been bitter, since I loved what I was doing at the time, but even though I had to move on, it was the right thing to do. One reason Apple's computers had cost so much is that they were providing "Insanely Great" service & support that just cost them too much (example: they were still giving away free phone support for Apple IIe's as late as the end of 1996!) !! [At the time they were also paying way too much for the wrong kind of marketing and had confused the market with too many very similar models, but that's beside the point]

    The funny thing is that even in reducing their phone support services in order to reduce costs, they seem to have managed this transition very well, since you didn't really see any trends in the marketplace where this seem to make a difference. In fact some of the best things that had happened in recent memory for Apple took place after this back room support reorganization happened. How many companies do you know of that can really manage to tighten up their service & support costs without hurting their service offerings or damaging their brand/reputation, and do it right before coming out with some of the most innovative work products that they had produced in years?

    Now, if Apple can just manage to use the Xserve line to break into the corporate world .....

  88. Apple thinks different all right by ryanvm · · Score: 2

    Apple rated the best for tech support. I guess this is where they think different (TM).

    No, they think different on price too. ;-)

  89. Re:Apple had better have the best support...NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well your argument flies out the Window(tm).
    First people who buy Apples DO add hardware that didn't come from Apple. Second people who buy Apples DO add software that didn't come from Apple. Thind Apple does have an *extensive* product line to support, past and present. When one looks at all the permutations of just the above, the problem space is much bigger than you make it out to be[1].

    And to finalize, the PC makers DON'T have to support billions of this and that, and 5+ operating systems. They ONLY have to support the much smaller space of what they sold you.

    [1] The same agrument below can apply to the Apple situation, but that's not what you were implying.

  90. Re:HP Tech Support-Got monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This isn't Russia where you have only one vendor, and you can treat everyone like shit. "

    Yes we do. It's called Microsoft. You may have heard of it?

  91. Re:Dell buys adds = Dell gets press by Forge · · Score: 2

    In some contries (Jamaica) Dell is the ONLY game around. I.e. You can call the 1-800 number and get a technician at your door with a replacment part.

    This is the part of service that is important to users like me who can figure out on our own if Windows is broken or the CPU is overheating.

    Yes. With a Compaqu or any other name brand PC. When it breaks you are going to be down for a month or more.

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  92. burn out by garyrich · · Score: 2

    " A good tech support person can handle bad users."

    A good tech rep that can handle problem users can get a job that pays far better and entails less stress. And they do. What's left are the ones that can't. If you are lucky and treat them well you can hang on to good techs with poor people skills and poor techs with good people skills. You can get teh job done that way - but it ain't easy.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  93. Re: by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    Actually, the hardware warranty is for a year. It's the don't-ask-for-a-credit-card-number tech support that's only 3 months. (And if it is a hardware problem after all, you're not charged. I can personally attest to that.)

  94. Re:Dell buys adds = Dell gets press by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I seem to remember calling either Apple tech support or sales at one point and after he was done helping, I just chatted with him for a while about some upcoming product (OS X, I think.)

  95. Re:Tech Support by NateTech · · Score: 1

    Maybe that's the whole point of the Consumer Reports survey???

    To paraphrase our favorite NY acting student-turned-Dell salesman, "Dude... You're gettin' a clue!"

    People who read Consumer Reports are INTERESTED in the question... "How good is their tech support." They're also probably willing to PAY for it.

    --
    +++OK ATH
  96. Re:More kudos to Apple ... anyone with bad stories by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

    I had this exact same experience with my IBM laptop, except I didn't even have to make the trip to AirBorne. They picked up at my dorm, which is good since I didn't have a car then.