Slashdot Mirror


The First Smiley :-)

An anonymous reader points to this excellent bit of online archaeology -- Mike Jones' effort to find the first online smiley. A bit from the site: "After a significant effort to locate it, on September 10, 2002 the original post made by Scott Fahlman on CMU CS general bboard was retrieved by Jeff Baird from an October 1982 backup tape of the spice vax (cmu-750x)." Interesting methodology and a lot of work went into the search -- shades of the Dead Media Project.

462 comments

  1. :-( (pad) by undeg+chwech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nostalgia makes me sad :-(

  2. There goes some trademarks bust! by Kindaian · · Score: 1

    Because that is much prior-art then the trademarks in itself...

    Well... they don't go bust... they aren't enforceable anymore... and the owners of it are the only ones that can use a ;) (tm)...

    Cheers...

    1. Re:There goes some trademarks bust! by pediddle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Trademarks are not patents.

    2. Re:There goes some trademarks bust! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was gibberish, please repost in English.

  3. Making history on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here is slashdots first ( 0 )( 0 ) set of knockers.

    1. Re:Making history on /. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

      Here is slashdot's first (*) asshole.

    2. Re:Making history on /. by Jonny+290 · · Score: 2

      No, here is Slashdot's first asshole.

      In loving remembrance of good ol' WIPO.

      --
      Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
    3. Re:Making history on /. by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      Indeed there are some real treasures and gems at that link.

      Here's my favorite story so far.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    4. Re:Making history on /. by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

      Here is slashdot's first (*) asshole.

      Too skinny, I suspect, for most of the nerds here. Try this:

      (_*_)

    5. Re:Making history on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how about some goatse with that?

      8====D

    6. Re:Making history on /. by MyHair · · Score: 1

      And how about some goatse with that?

      Ok, if you insist:

      (_O_)

  4. Usenet and Emoticons by messiertom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a link to a usenet posting describing the use of emoticons/smilies (it references Fahlmen).

    1. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      ...and reading onward, you can see that in 1982, they were already concerned about smart quotes.

      --
      Evan (no reference)

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by generic-man · · Score: 4, Informative

      A bit of trivia: the Carnegie Mellon user who posted that ancient message is Jim Morris. Most CMU computer science majors would recognize Prof. Morris: he's now the dean of the School of Computer Science.

      Spread the word, Jim. :-)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Geez, Jason, did you have to post the link that included his SMS address? Or the address of his house? Poor guy. Just trying to run SCS.

      Nice guy, that Dr. Morris.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    4. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Quoting that post,
      oo for somebody's head-lights are on messages
      Ah, 1982. It must have been nice to live in a business world where "sexual harassment" hadn't yet entered the lexicon, I'd hate to think what would happen to the poor guy who sent a "somebody's headlights are on" email around the office today... Even if he really was talking about a car. :)
    5. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by iamiuru · · Score: 3, Funny
      I can see it now. For god only knows how long, Prof. Morris will be getting all the different smiley variations. Well at least if his phone is set to vibrate and he has it in his pants he will KNOW that he is loved and FEEL that love.

      ;)

      --
      That is your ass, and this over here is your elbow, and NO they ARE NOT the same thing.
    6. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by jon+doh! · · Score: 1

      i quite enjoyed the specs of the computer he wanted:

      The concept is an under $5K workstation.
      68000 based with 256K standard.
      15 inch 35mhz video
      Bit mapped 720x560 display.
      120x56 in landscape mode
      90x72 in portrait mode
      Two serial ports.
      One omninet interface (1mbps serial rs422)
      Detached Keyboard with lots of extra keys.


      15-inch display? is there any real need for a monitor that big?

    7. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2


      Well, actually, if you type in "Jim Morris CMU" into google, that page comes up at the top of the list. So, I'm not sure posting the link on Slashdot is that much of a faux pas.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    8. Re:Usenet and Emoticons by RoundSparrow · · Score: 1

      Some people just don't get it - posting your phone number on the Internet - no one calls!

      Ya know, it might be in his local phone book too!

  5. Changes with time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting that the original smiley had a nose while most of the happy smilies used today go noseless...

    I suppose plotting the change would need entirely different study, though.

    1. Re:Changes with time... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 2

      People today are way to busy to deal with the - in the :-). We've got things to do and people to see.

  6. This is proof! by km790816 · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...that people at Microsoft do inovate!

    1. Re:This is proof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your post is proof that u r an idiot!

  7. Surprising by _anomaly_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone else kind of surprised that this didn't happen prior to '82?
    Maybe it's just my cynical nature, but it's hard to imagine that emoticons as we know them weren't thrown around amongst colleagues in academia way before this.

    At any rate, I'll sleep better now knowing... ;-]

    --
    "I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious." - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Surprising by generic-man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to Fahlman's own page on the subject, there is the possibility that the smiley symbol was used by teletype operators way back in the day. However, there is no hard evidence of this occurring, and no web pages document it. As we all know, if a point has no web page supporting it, it can't be true. :-)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I thought porn was around for a long time before the Internet.

    3. Re:Surprising by M@T · · Score: 2


      I would have thought their use would have preceded computers via typewriters or doesn't that count?

      --
      'sapientia potestas est'
    4. Re:Surprising by gid · · Score: 2

      I'm sure someone used a smiley before that time. It's a pretty logical way to make a smile with only text characters. A typewriter is a good possibility of a device that could have created a smile that someone else gave, and I thought of also when I first read the article.

      For all I know, I invented the smile in 1989/1990? when I first joined irc through Cleveland Freenet. Heh, ok, I know I didn't. Besides I'm way to modest to ever claim credit to anything of that magnitude, but hell if I can remember the first place that I saw it, recognized it, or used it. :)

      I don't doubt that this guy came up with a smiley face on his own, but I'd call this guy "an inventor" of the smile, not "the inventor". I'd find it pretty hard to believe that no one ever typed a smile in a personal letter or what not that someone typed to someone else long ago.

    5. Re:Surprising by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      the guy never "took credit" for the smilie. he just posted it to usenet and said "use this"

    6. Re:Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We used to use the classic smiley and -) for 'tongue in cheek' on the telex system back in the early 1980s.

    7. Re:Surprising by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Isn't it interesting how obvious every "innovation" is once it has been pointed out to people?
      Just goes to show that everything is easy if you know how.

      "For all I know, I invented the smile in 1989/1990?"
      You would be 7 or 8 years too late.
      If you don't read the article, please, at least read the original post!
      "from an October 1982 backup tape"

    8. Re:Surprising by gid · · Score: 1

      You would be 7 or 8 years too late.
      If you don't read the article, please, at least read the original post!


      Yes I read the darn article and the original post. You totally missed my point. My point was that since I don't remember learning the smile from anyone, I might tend to think I invented it. Well, I really don't feel that way, but if I can't remember who I learned it from in 1989 or if I even learned it from anyone, then imagine if I first used it in 1982! :)))))))))))

      And who invented the multiple lipped smiley? I want to shoot them! [=

    9. Re:Surprising by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2
      Reading a little more reveals he does take credit. See his home page at http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/sefSmiley.htm.

      To quote:
      Yes, I am the inventor of the sideways "smiley face"

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  8. First A$$ in ascii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    (_(_

    That's funny.

    1. Re:First A$$ in ascii by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      (_*_)

      goatse.cx ascii style

  9. Another birth? by vstat · · Score: 1

    I guess this could also be considered the start of ASCII artwork (http://www.textfiles.com/art/). I much perfer that to the faces which have seem to have gone overboard lately.

    1. Re:Another birth? by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nah, ASCII art has been around a lot longer than that. In the same thread, they're referencing Nroff, Press, and Tex formatted images of ET and Yoda.

      One of my father-in-law's favorite war stories was about his stint as a communications officer at a U.S. base in South Korea during the Veitnam war. At one point a good buddy in the U.S. sent him and his fellows a fairly high resolution black and white version of Playboy's Miss October 71... via teletype. The image had to be stapled together from multiple teletype sheets (4 feet wide and 6 feet long, I think he said) and viewed from several feet away before the print characters were recognizable as a female figure.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:Another birth? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Talking about the ascii yoda art, I found that last sentance funny enough that I made it my sig... :)

    3. Re:Another birth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Artwork using typewriters was around 'way back in the 1960s, and in the mid 1970s there were several ASCII pictures on the old IBM 370 including a rather fine life-size one of Raquel Welch.

    4. Re:Another birth? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

      Porn truly is on the cutting edge of every technology!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Scott's a great guy -- he gave me my first hacking job! -- but he's got a lot to answer for with this one...

    "The smiley is an attack on writers and readers alike. If it is funny, it doesn't need a smiley. If is not funny, a smiley won't help it. The smiley teaches writers that anything they write will pass as humor as long as it is punctuated properly. It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent." -- Jim Showalter
    1. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster, quoting Jim Showalter:

      It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent

      I understand completely. That's why, when I tell a joke, I make sure to do it in a total monotone, completely deadpan. That way I don't accidentally teach my audience to ignore their better judgment or to rely on body language.


      Oh, in case it wasm't clear: :)

    2. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by gilroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The smiley teaches writers that anything they write will pass as humor as long as it is punctuated properly. It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent.

      Adding even more, it also makes sense that we should not use commas to indicate pauses -- or periods for sentence stops -- since that should be clear from context. We wouldn't want readers coming to rely upon mere punctuation, now would we?
    3. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by tempest303 · · Score: 2

      *clap*clap*clap*

      Amen, man. There's no excuse for poor writing, but emoticons are not the scourge they're made out to be by some.

    4. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by EvlG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Humor in real life conversation is conveyed not only through words, but also through body language, tone, and context.

      In text, you have none of the first two, and the third can often be impaired.

      The simely is one of the few universally recognized ways to do this - it breaks language barriers even!

      What more could we ask for from 2 simple characters?

    5. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont use a :) cause something is funny. I use a :) cause it makes me smile. If it makes me laugh I'll use any number of laughing shorthands. Yes u smile when u laugh, but just cause u are smiling doesnt mean u are laughing.

    6. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by boskone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      except that we use punctuation and smileys in online media so that we can convey the grin we'd give someone. ie, if you make a jab at someone, but you're kidding, the grin is the only way for them to know you weren't ripping on them.

      I think that's the most common usage.

    7. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by pyrrho · · Score: 2

      ug, lameness filter opposed me presenting my point in authentic form....

      The romans used all capitals, no spaces or punctuation at all, if it was good enough for them... who are you to defy the Holy Roman Empire.

      hmmm, I think it's lamer this way, the other way was much more funny.... better add this, :)

      --

      -pyrrho

    8. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by s20451 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I agree for some types of humor. However, if you try to use text (such as e-mail, or this comment) to convey sarcasm, I guarantee you will come off as an asshole unless you indicate that you are kidding by using a smiley. Humor can be conveyed by any number of signals beyond the words themselves, such as tone of voice and facial expression.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    9. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well you're just a fucking genius, aren't you?

      ;-)

    10. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by jandrese · · Score: 1, Troll

      I think it's too late. He already comes off as an asshole... Maybe the entire post was ment to be sarcasm? The world will never know.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    11. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2

      "If the King's English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!"
      Miriam "Ma" Ferguson, Governor of Texas, circa 1920

    12. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by danamania · · Score: 2

      I agree with extreme restriction of smileys in formal writing - but not all emails are this formal - as many have said above there's the body language thing we use when saying something amusing, which is part of it - but emails/IMs/chatting online is closer to a conversation. Not only do we tell funnies, we respond to them in realtime/near realtime as well!. A smiley works extraordinarily well there - shorthand for '/me grins'

      a grrl & her server

    13. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by calags · · Score: 1

      well if the romans can't help but shout everytime they write then good riddance to their empire!

      aneeway its oll da stoopid barberians hu kant spel and dont give a thot to ritin and ritmitik dat beet dem in de end

      P.S. :-)

      --
      Never attribute to stupidity what can be construed as a monopoly preservation tactic.
    14. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by fermion · · Score: 1
      It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent.

      I think the premise of this is that your recipients are really stupid. After all emoticons do not dictate action or reaction any more than the message of the text. They merely suggest a motivation. I would not dare assume anything about other recipients, but I feel mine are smart enough to know the difference.

      Furthermore, such a statement probably comes from a person with very little expense in personal letter writing by hand. Decorative annotations that suggest intent are widely used in such letter writing, and character decorations are one of the big things that has been lost in the movement to typewritten text. Emoticons are a natural attempt to translate these decorations to another media.

      As always, the reader is free to ignore these hints in the same way they would ignore. a misplace period or: colon or even? a question! mark or the like. We, however, hope that the writer is literate enough not to make such foolish mistakes. Pehaps the writer is even clever enough to make a joke that does not need an emoticon!

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    15. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! ... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput. :)

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    16. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by firewrought · · Score: 1
      Smilies are just another marker to indicate information that we normally express with supersegmentals (stress, intonation, etc.) in spoken speech. In formal writing, we use question marks (?), exclamation points (!), "pretentious quotes", and italics to capture such information. Unfortunately, these traditional mechanisms are not broad enough to effectively encode all the nucances we express with supersegmentals and body language. This is one reason that written language is very different from spoken language.

      The smilie mechanism allows us to more directly represent our spoken language, and is very appropriate for a textual medium where people want to encode tounge-in-cheek jokes, lighthearted insults, and other such emotional artifacts without wasting a lot of time trying to do it formally.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    17. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Genyin · · Score: 1

      Well you're just a fucking genius, aren't you?
      I wouldn't look on slashdot for fucking geniuses... :-}

    18. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by teaserX · · Score: 2
      Forgive me for whippin' out my pedantium here but the Holy Roman Empire was a contrivance of Charlemagne named so in order emulate the glory of the (by then) fallen Roman Empire. The Holy Roman Empire eventually became the Germany we know today. It follows that there were no Romans in the Holy Roman Empire only Germans.

      I'll sit down now.

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    19. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Bug-Man · · Score: 0

      Scott's a great guy -- he gave me my first hacking job! -- but he's got a lot to answer for with this one...

      Why should he have to answer for it? Should the person who first discovered gun-powder have to answer for that? Or the first person to invent an atom bomb? Or the person who invented cinema hot dogs?

      Why should we hold these people responsible for things they simply invented? It was the world that adopted it.

    20. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by boomka · · Score: 1

      nah, wrong. The purpose of the smiley is not to tell me to accept something as funny, it's to let me know the reader perceives it as funny. it's a useful piece of information. anyway, i think the poster of the parent intended the quote as a joke, but forgot to add the smiley

      --
      Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.
      H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History"
    21. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1, Funny

      I've heard it summed up in this quote: "The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, Roman, nor an Empire."

    22. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you are aware of this invention called "books"? They've never seemed to need any of this shit.

      The original point stands: smileys are only needed by poor writers. It is true that the world is full of poor writers. That doesn't change the fact that use of smileys indicates an abominable grasp of the written word.

    23. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey it works for steven right :)

    24. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      What about the question mark in your own statement? Can't you make your point without that little crutch? It's the mark of a bad writer. The same thing goes for exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!!!

    25. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps... but smileys are primarily used in two-way communication, with people "talking" and interacting with each other. (E-mail, message boards, IRC, ICQ/AIM) I'd hardly expect to see a smiley in, say, a chapter of an online novel.

    26. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Are you sure it's Jim Showalter? I remember with some vividness an old CMU crusty hacker sort named Tim Showalter. Finger information follows:

      [marklar:~] max% finger tim.showalter@andrew.cmu.edu
      [andrew.cmu.edu]
      name: Tim Showalter
      project: looking for an honest man with a stolen lantern

      login name: tjs
      new mail: none; last read Thu Sep 12 14:41 (10 hours ago)

      e-mail: tjs@andrew.cmu.edu
      tjs@andrew.cmu.edu

      other e-mail: tjs@psaux.com (personal)
      tjs@mirapoint.com (work)

      etc...

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    27. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      But chaste geniuses abound.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    28. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      I agree totally. Back when I was a kid we didn't have smileys. We had letters and numbers and various math related characters on our keyboards.

      Kids today have it too easy and it's making them lazy. <g>

    29. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes. For instance, when a girl I was interested in (who had told me that she *wasn't* interested) didn't answer an email, and I gently reminded her, I used a smiley to show that I wasn't a bitter psychopath who was going to stalk her and bash her head in with a tire-iron. It's easy for good old JWZ to sit up there in his high tower and pontificate but he isn't staring down a restraining order.

    30. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by l810c · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Perhaps you are aware of this invention called "books"? They've never seemed to need any of this shit.

      A book takes many months to write. It is thought out, edited and (usually)long.

      On the other hand, we are having a conversation. If we were face to face, I might move my hands, make facial expressions and change tones. Emoticoms are the online forum equivilent of such :p

    31. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by lairdb · · Score: 1
      Ahem. Shouldn't that be:
      adding even more it also makes sense that we should not use commas to indicate pauses or periods for sentence stops since that should be clear from context we wouldnt want readers coming to rely upon mere punctuation now would we
      --
      "...and to everyone else out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together, guys."
    32. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 4, Funny
      What more could we ask for from 2 simple characters?
      A nose? ;-)
      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    33. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Perhaps you are aware of this invention called "books"? They've never seemed to need any of this shit.

      That's right. And the meaning of text in books has never been misinterpreted, has it? Even though a book's prose can be polished for months. The first guy to put spaces between his words probably heard much the same argument...
    34. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, lemme try:

      allyourbasearebelongtous

      was that still funny?

    35. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The problem is that BOOKS are not interactive. Email (and now even more IMs) ARE. Personally I wouldn't normally use a smiley just to indicate a clever/funny comment I wrote (if nothing else, it undermines a truly good line!) but smileys are sometimes ESSENTIAL to convey that "witty sarcasm" in an email/IM conversation that, if taken wrong, can cause some serious "misunderstandings" (and I'd be amazed at anyone using email more than a year who hasn't had that happen at some point...)

    36. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by IHateUniqueNicks · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for you (and perhaps me as well), apart from the word "srtata", I beleive I interpreted that exactly the same way you did. :(

    37. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that quote is generally attributed to Voltaire. By his time, it was most certainly true, but in Charlemagnes time the Holy Roman Empire was a real empire. On top of that, it was blessed by the Pope, making it "holy", although I don't think it stretched as far as Rome, which I would wager was still governed by the Pope at that time.

    38. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 2
      "The smiley is an attack on writers and readers alike. If it is funny, it doesn't need a smiley. If is not funny, a smiley won't help it. The smiley teaches writers that anything they write will pass as humor as long as it is punctuated properly. It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent." -- Jim Showalter


      The exclamation point is an attack on writers and readers alike. If it's emphatic, it doesn't need an exclamation point. If it's not emphatic, an exclamation point won't help it. The exclamation point teaches writers that anything they write will pass as forceful as long as it is punctuated properly. It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent.
    39. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by gid · · Score: 2

      heh, I know Mike Meyers said that in a "Coffee Talk" skit on SNL.

      "I'm getting verclempt (sp?) again. I'll give you a topic. The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, Roman, nor an Empire. Discuss."

      Or something there abouts, the only reason I remember it, was because I was taking a medieval history class at the time, and we just learned what the Holy Roman Empire was, and thought it kind of strange for SNL to mention the HRE as I'd never heard of it before I took the class. :)

      Look a smiley! I'm on topic. :)

      Of course, we all know about denoser, right? :)

    40. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by TV-SET · · Score: 1

      Oh c'mon, it's a blank-and-white world out there!

      Just an example to consider: English is used by plenty of people from different countries and cultures. It is not always clear what was meant by the message. And smileys help ALOT.

      PS: As to the argumen of books not using smileys, I agree to both points made by respective authors:
      1. Books ARE different from personal communications.
      2. Books ARE misunderstood too often.

      PPS: And, yes, I am not a native English speaker :)

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    41. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever heard about people sending letters ?
      They do not really take long to write, and usually did not contain smileys ("did not" would be better, because I indeed used smileys in letters because I was used to put them in e-mails first)

      ^_^

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    42. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Smileys are conceptual wheelchair-ramps for the humour impaired"

    43. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by extrasolar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Except no one knows what the rules for emoticons(?) are. I know rules are uncool and all but...

      How are we supposed to put smileys into parenthesis (like :))?

      And goddamnit it always fucks up my paren-matching in emacs.

      And whats with the ^^&:o/o)) that turns into a stoned pumkin with a santa hat eating a bald chickin in yahoo messenger?

      And how much happier does three smileys make you compared to one smiley?

      Sure, I was all gung ho about smileys too. Then they started making them *backward*. WTF?

      I think it was Scott McNeally who said something like most of us don't deserve the formatting abilities of of even ASCII. This is what he means.

    44. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent.

      Ever worse example of that approach is background laugh (what is the terminus for that?) in many poor TV shows. Are they trying to tell you - hat's funny, now you have to laugh? It can be found quite insulting. Maybe that's why I can's stand sit-coms (although mostly they are very poor)

    45. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Filik · · Score: 1

      Having your smilies upside down is just a way of communicating that you are at the other side of equator, thus..upside down (relative to any globuses I've ever seen anyway).

    46. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by EricLivingston · · Score: 2

      The parent post is an absolutely perfect demonstration of the use of an emoticon. There is a vast difference in how I reacted to the post above from how I would have reacted to the same post without the emoticon (I would have thought the writer was truly ripping into the prior poster). By using the emoticon this writer has defused his own post, making it clear he's joking. To achieve the same effect without such would have required some kind of (Just Kidding!) text afterwards - I find the emoticon far more efficient and elegant.

      --
      Please Rate my comment (and help support Fre
    47. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I'm lucky I only read the first part of your post.

      You really need to put a warning before you quote stuff like that.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    48. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm sure the smiley made a difference - 'cos bitter psychopaths don't use them... :)

    49. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps you are aware of this invention called "books"? They've never seemed to need any of this shit.

      There is a lot of space for other things besides the raw conversation in books.

      You'll see things like:

      Mike wheezed and laughed as he forced his words out, "Hey, look what I found...can you believe that scavenger hunt item #113 is A Hugo in a Yugo?"

      On the web, that would be: "Hey, look what I found...can you believe that scavenger hunt item #113 is A Hugo in a Yugo? :P"

      The prefix in the novel version is replaced by the emoticon. Just because the two versions are both text doesn't mean the medium is the same. There's no built in way of describing "context" on the web like there is in novels.

    50. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by notfancy · · Score: 1

      It teaches readers that they must ignore their better judgment, and look only at punctuation to determine intent.

      Yes! Yes!

      Yes, yes...

      Erm...

    51. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well you're just a fucking genious....

    52. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by jo2y · · Score: 1

      Scott gave me my first full-time Linux Admin job. He is uber cool.

    53. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by daeley · · Score: 2

      Then they started making them *backward*.

      Lefties do that, left-handed people that is. *Sinister* people, so to speak. I say let 'em have their fun; God knows they deal with so much crap in this life. ;) or, in solidarity with my leftist brethern (;

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    54. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      How are we supposed to put smileys into parenthesis (like :))? :))? looks like some guy with a double chin and a huge sperm swimming around on his chest.

    55. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by yardbird · · Score: 1
      In my experience, smileys are used so often in parenthetical asides that it is almost standard practice to have the smiley coincide and merge with the closing paren. (Sorry, can't come up with an example. :-)

      The other thing you can do is use an alternative smiley (like this [-: ). Then you only mess up bracket matching. Guess you just have to make an even number of humorous comments. ;]

      --
      Free, legal music for iTunes users.
    56. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smileys are a crutch.

      I don't recall Douglas Adams needing to use them in any of his books, and he was able to convey humor and poignant emotions. Writing is not speaking.

    57. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      actually smileys are needed by poor readers

    58. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by misfit13b · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Ha ha ha h... *thud*

    59. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by bogado · · Score: 2
      I don't agree, writing a letter takes more time then answering in text chat or something like that. In the times when we didn't have email, a letter could take days or even weeks to arrive, this would make more then enougth time to ponder about what you would answer.


      e-mails ususualy get to their destiny in seconds, ina bad day minutes. The sender expects to get an answer quickly, depending on the urgency, a few hours or days. Also the amount of email we receive and answer tend to make the time available for each email very small.

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    60. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by aleecia · · Score: 1

      old CMU crusty hacker sort named Tim Showalter

      Tim is many things, including charming, but does not qualify as either "crusty" or "old." It's likely Tim was in elementary school in 1982.

      One hint: the original-style andrew passwords were in the form first initial-last initial-number-alphanum. It's not uncommon for folks from that era to squint at each other and say "I'm not sure I remember your name... what was your user id? Oh! Sure, of course I know you."

      That said, 1982 pre-dates the Andrew system. I 'm older than Tim, but not by that much. The earliest system I remember was the TOPS-20. "spice vax," as mentioned in the initial post, rings vague fuzzy bells, but wasn't part of my world.

      One of the cooler parts of the Andrew project was that IBM wired the entire campus for token ring -- including the gym and the women's bathrooms. And damned if we didn't find a use for it all. These days campus is wireless, but back in my day, it was uphill, in the snow, both ways...

      Aleecia
      am40
    61. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by eric6 · · Score: 1
      despite your mockery, this is largely true. The exclamation point, like the smiley, should be used in careful moderation.


      otherwise you're stupid!! ;)

      --

      --
      fight global cooling

    62. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it make you feel clever quoting someone who sounds like they know what they're talking about but are in fact talking out of their posteriors?

    63. Re:may god forgive him for what he has unleashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want you to die :-)

      Presumably you are now utterly confused, unsure of the intent of my post, after all that smiley ordered you to assume the preceding text was jocular did it not?

  12. Strange. by neksys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's kind of exciting that, with the modern time-scale, we can actually trace things like this to their originator. It's the like that age old question: "All I want to know is who the man is that looked at a cow and said 'I think I drink from whatever comes out of those things when I squeeze them.'" I always sort of assumed that the smiley would become much like the milk - of amorphous origins, but part of our culture nonetheless.

    1. Re:Strange. by godlee · · Score: 2, Funny

      "All I want to know is who the man is that looked at a cow and said 'I think I drink from whatever comes out of those things when I squeeze them.'"

      Kinda like the native amercans who first smoked weed. How many weeds did they have to smoke before they got the right one?

    2. Re:Strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sure pot was eaten and it's effects were known before someone decided to smoke it. same with coca leaves leading to making cocaine, and when sniffing doesn't work anymore ppl start smoking,shooting, etc.

    3. Re:Strange. by tinrobot · · Score: 2

      They got their dogs high first... that's where animal testing began.

    4. Re:Strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sniffing doesn't work anymore ppl start smoking,shooting, etc

      For most drugs, that is a complete lie. Only alcohol, heroin and crack really have a large tolerence build up.

      Your educators lied to you, using funds supplied by the alcohol and tobacco industry. The biggest contributer to "Partnership for a Drug Free America" is Budwieser. Funny that!! These organisations also give money to TV shows and movies if they portray "illegal" drugs in a bad light, hence most of the movies in the 80s had big bad drug deallers as the "baddie".

      In response to the post, back then people tried pretty much anything. A lot of the medical knowledge comes from folklore and local knowledge passed down the generations. They would observe things about particular roots and herbs and pass that onto their fellow man. None of this patent nonesence back then!!

    5. Re:Strange. by markt4 · · Score: 1

      Actually, drinking from a cow wasn't that much of a reach. It was probably something along the lines of "Hmmm, I wonder why that baby cow is so excited about sucking on those." I believe it was George Carlin who pointed out the real leap of faith: Who was the first guy who, while walking along a beach, spots a lobster and says, "I think I'm going to eat that thing."

    6. Re:Strange. by Andy_R · · Score: 2

      Haemorroid treatment contains extract of whale liver. The poor bumgrape sufferer who first walked along a beach, found a washed-up whale carcass, and thought to himself 'well, it might just hurt less if I stuffed that bit there up my ass' made more of a leap of faith imho.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    7. Re:Strange. by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      What I want to know is who was the guy that went around licking frogs to try to get high...

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    8. Re:Strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Oysters. How hungry did that guy have
      to be to decide that was food?

    9. Re:Strange. by sbjornda · · Score: 1
      It's the like that age old question: "All I want to know is who the man is that looked at a cow and said 'I think I drink from whatever comes out of those things when I squeeze them.'"
      I've always thought that joke was rather shallow. Surely this was easily learned by watching a calf (or any other young mammal, including humans) suck. In many cultures children breastfeed to supplement their diet and for comfort until over four years of age. It's not a long stretch, then, for inquisitive adult humans to try the milk of other species.

      Tangent: I've heard one naturalist say that seal and whale milk is disgusting stuff to most humans, reeking strongly of blubber.

      Another tangent: I've also seen a whale display in a museum that indicated a baby blue whale gains an average of 8 pounds per hour just by suckling. Big momma!

      (I guess this is both Offtopic and Interesting.)

      .nosig

    10. Re:Strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "All I want to know is who the man is that looked at a cow and said 'I think I drink from whatever comes out of those things when I squeeze them.'"

      If you're sincerely interested in this question you should check out Jared Diamond's book Guns Germs & Steel, in which he discusses this very question--not just about bovines, but about virtually all domesticated plants and animals.

      Turns out most crop plants, for instance, are descended from barely edible or even inedible wild forebears that were hybridized into their current state of deliciousness by intrepid fertile crescent types.

      Kinda gives a new perspective on the whole GM foods debate....

    11. Re:Strange. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      Cow's milk isn't that big a leap. Human babies feed at the breast, calves feed at the utter. At some point, they probably decided to give cow's milk to a baby who's mother wasn't lactating. From there, it's just a matter of adults eating "baby food". In fact, this may have caused our evolution to move towards lactation failure as a more common condition. That could be a good thing. It might reduce the incidence of breast cancer. It's not such a good thing if you're a "breast man" but if all these things are based on the primal need to survive, some other female trait would probably step forward into the gap.

      Now, I'd really like to know about the guy who said "Hey, here's some wet rotting grain. Let's drink it. Mmmmm.... bitter. Let's drink some more... hic! (later) Hey buds! Let's Party!!!"

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    12. Re:Strange. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jeez, this brings back memories. WAY OT but...me and my friends were all sitting in my friends basement stoned and had this exact conversation. What other plants did they smoke? Did they stop at plants? Animals? Did they try smoking squirrels? How big of a bowl would you need for a squirrel?

      This of course brings about antics like "Hey, pack another squirrel man, this one's kicked."

    13. Re:Strange. by Laxitive · · Score: 2

      Actually, marijuana is not a north american plant. It was used in China and India more than a thousand years ago.

      The native american's main contribution was the concept of smoking it, as opposed to brewing or chewing.

      The concept of smoking a plant to deliver chemical to the brain comes from tobacco. This custom may have come from another plant called sweetgrass. Sweetgrass is a grass that grows wild in north america, and releases a sweet scent when burned. It also has chemicals with psychoactive properties.

      It's known that native americans burned sweetgrass in bonfires due to it's sweet smell. It's possible that they noticed it's hallucinogenic effects, and decided to apply the same method of consumption to tobacco, which they already knew provided certain mental effects when eaten.

      And then when the colonists came, the concept of smoking as a way of taking in chemichals spread to the rest of the world.

      This may be wrong, but it's my hypothesis. I havn't done much research into the origins of smoking.

      -Laxitive

    14. Re:Strange. by joto · · Score: 2
      Well, even I could have thought of milking a cow. But what I really want to know, is who got the idea of churning butter. I mean, it takes a lot of time. If you have the right churning equipment, and the cream is just right, it will take at least half an hour before you start getting something like butter. Otherwise, it will take much longer.

      Now consider the reasonably intelligent person thinking "hmm.. today I'm going to try something new...". Let's churn this cream, and see what it will turn into. Any reasonable intelligent person will after 5-10 minutes have given up. But no, not our guy. He continues... 15 minutes. 20 minutes (Hmmm, this is getting heavy and boring, maybe I should do it a bit more...), 25 minutes, 30 minutes (well, ok, let's assume he was lucky the first time).

      And then he tastes the stuff. Ough! Butter isn't really that tasty! Maybe I should make some more, and see if I can use it for cooking?

      It always amazes me what kind of stupid ideas people come up with, that are actually very useful. Have you ever considered stuffing small green frogs up someones vagina? Hmm, let's try one. No, nothing happens. Hmm, let's try another one then... And another one. I once saw a horrible movie-clip (on kazaa of course) which had exactly this idea. Of course the movie-clip wasn't really long enough to see what kind of interesting stuff might happen if you continued long enough, but hey, if you do it for, say half an hour continously, maybe you eventually get something interesting out of the process... I doubt it will be butter, though.

  13. And I've made it my mission... by nakaduct · · Score: 5, Funny

    To live to see the last.

    1. Re:And I've made it my mission... by pla · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah, should I address you as Mr. Rosen, or Mr. Valenti?

    2. Re:And I've made it my mission... by alienmole · · Score: 2
      Um, wouldn't that Ms. Rosen?

      I don't think it's a "Mrs.", although I'm not up on my politically correct honorifics as applied to lesbians. That's not a slur - Ms. Rosen is a lesbian who, with her partner Elizabeth Birch, Director of the Human Rights Campaign ("working for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equal rights"), adopted twins in 1999.

    3. Re:And I've made it my mission... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thus proving that people can be very sensitive when it comes to the rights of their own groups and still be oblivious assholes when it comes to the rights of others. :/ (Obligatory emoticon, for the story)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:And I've made it my mission... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Can confirm this for sure.

      On a similar note, it's fascinating to see how much of the media industry is gay.

      Not that I have any problems with it, but still, it's interesting.

  14. (Almost) 20 years ago today... by Eryq · · Score: 2, Funny

    We should throw a party in a month.
    And just think! In one more year, smiley
    will be old enough to buy beer legally!

    {hic} :-}

    --
    I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
    1. Re:(Almost) 20 years ago today... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's already old enough here in BC. Cheers! :-)

  15. holy moly! by 7*6 · · Score: 0

    I hope that guy becomes famous!!

  16. Geek & Naming Conventions by Myriad · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why is it that for things like this many geeks will automatically think of the same name? Ie, way back when I first saw a :) (ah BBS days) I got its meaning and thought of it as a "smiley". Quickly I found out that was what people called it. This kind of thing happens to most geeks I know.

    Yet the moment any of us start coding, damned if we don't come up with naming conventions that mean squat to everyone else. Unless, of course, we've been dictated to use someone elses nonsense! :)

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Geek & Naming Conventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My fav is when people declare variables with negative prefixes such as bNotDone and then use them in negated compares such as "if (not bNotDone) then"

    2. Re:Geek & Naming Conventions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me started about trying to decipher predicate functions written by people who don't speak english. I've got nothing against my coworkers, but being here in Japan, why can't they just use some Japanese? What exactly does bool IsFileAlready() do?

    3. Re:Geek & Naming Conventions by ksp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you didn't come up it first. Perhaps a subconscious reminder?

      http://www.smileydictionary.com/history.html

      "Back in the early 70's Franklin Loufrani a journalist created a simple concept for France soir and other European newspapers, he displayed icons to communicate news and especially good ones. He gave this original icon the name of Smiley, it was published for the first time on Jan 1st 1972."

      --
      What is the sound of one hand clapping?
      cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
    4. Re:Geek & Naming Conventions by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

      many geeks will automatically think of the same name?

      Like the way I called the "Melnorme" from Starcontrol 2 the Melon-Drones.

      ok, maybe that one was just me.

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
  17. 11:44 by digitalsushi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Ah yes, I get all my most important work done in the half hour before lunch, as well.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  18. With a face like that... by Nakoruru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check out the inventors home page.

    Looks like a happy guy, how appropriate.

    1. Re:With a face like that... by danaronson · · Score: 1

      Back in 1983 I worked for Scott on the SPICELisp project. What an incredible, funny, and motivating guy. It was the kind of work that people like him and Rick Rashid were able to get done with undergrads that both set my career in motion and make me really happy that I went to CMU.

  19. Re:In all seriousness... by ahaning · · Score: 1

    The Internet Archive's first crawl of the site was May 08, 1999, if that helps.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  20. revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is more revolutionary than you might think!

    We now have proof - justification, if you will, that Microsoft has a *GOOD, LEGITIMATE* reason for their high software prices! Research and Development money....must have been billions to formulate a ':-)'.

    Does this mean linux zealots will stop using emoticons? what will replace them? doritocons and mountaindewcons?

    ----------

    Milk the Moose!

    -Fleezarpobog

    1. Re:revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious troll, don't bother responding.

    2. Re:revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol yes but did you milk the moose?

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. First smiley? by Knife_Edge · · Score: 2

    Well, great that they found the first smiley, but I will not be satisfied until I see the LAST one. Once upon a time, people could communicate emotions effectively simply through the tone of their writing. Now that people have apparently lost this ability, they use a crude text representation of a facial expression. This is not an improvement.

    1. Re:First smiley? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

      You're right, but in my experience the problem isn't so much with the writer as with the reader. It's not uncommon for me to see someone post something that's obviously satirical or sarcastic only to have some brain-dead luser take it seriously at face value and flame his nose hairs off. Smileys are an invaluable guide to the illiterate.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    2. Re:First smiley? by joshua404 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Well, great that they found the first smiley, but I will not be satisfied until I see the LAST one. Once upon a time, people could communicate emotions effectively simply through the tone of their writing. Now that people have apparently lost this ability, they use a crude text representation of a facial expression. This is not an improvement.

      Lighten the fuck up. :-)

    3. Re:First smiley? by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Once upon a time, people could communicate emotions effectively simply through the tone of their writing.

      Once upon a time, people didn't have lowercase and so could not use uppercase for emphasis or to mark the start of a sentence.

      Once upon a time, people didn't write spaces between words in their text.

      Once upon a time, people didn't have vowels to help distinguish words.

      Once upon a time, people didn't have question marks or exclamation points to indicate interrogatives or imperatives.
      Get over it. "The tone of their writing" is simply too unreliable a mechanism for conveying in print what body language does for us in person. Why is the smiley any more objectionable as punctuation than, say, the question mark?

    4. Re:First smiley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just mad that nobody ever :) at him.

    5. Re:First smiley? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      if somebody tells you a joke on irc how are you supposed to respond better than with :D :D :D :D :D ROTFL LOL.

      you see, when you have no life and irc all day you get very lazy and don't want to write:
      "that makes my humour unit tickle and make me output sounds like 'ha, ha, ha'"
      everytime somebody posts a funny link.
      most people who know the proper use of 'emoticons' or wtf they're supposed to be called would be able to express their feelings in text too.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:First smiley? by AnnaBlack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Once upon a time, people could communicate emotions effectively simply through the tone of their writing.

      Well, skilled writers can still do that. Not everybody is a skilled writer, or has the time to read and re-read what they have written to ensure that the emotion will come across. Much also depends on the context in which the reader reads the text. Look at the thread in which the smiley was first proposed (it's linked from the article); it's evident that the discussion was also about what was and was not a joke. Sometimes, especially with deadpan humour, it's not at all obvious.

      For readers whose first language is not that in which the text is composed it can be very helpful to have the context signalled like this. Even for me, an English speaker from the UK, occasionally I value a smiley if reading something from the US, since I don't have all the cultural references in common with the writer.

      Text doesn't have tone of voice, of course, so what exactly is wrong with developing conventions that convey some of the non-verbal signals that would normally be expressed in conversational language?

      In summary - if you don't like smileys, leave those of us who do alone, ok?

      Anna B :)

    7. Re:First smiley? by extrasolar · · Score: 2

      Fuck the fuck up.

      He's right.

    8. Re:First smiley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jaysus, maybe you should get over it. This about the fourth "Blockquoth the Poster" post I have read. Thanks for the history of writing, now could you please move on to the merits of the Sapir-Worf hypothesis?

  23. First smileys, what's next? by el_benito · · Score: 1

    Ooh, let's make it an ongoing series. Where was the first usage of "pr0n"?

    --
    http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    1. Re:First smileys, what's next? by scott1853 · · Score: 2
    2. Re:First smileys, what's next? by wwwssabbsdotcom · · Score: 1

      That I'd be interesting in finding out, but it's probably along the lines of d00dz and Warez as far as its origin. More useless trivia.

      --
      Relive the BBS Past - One Byte at a Time! www.ssabbs.com
  24. typewriter messages by vossman77 · · Score: 1

    I know this is a online smiley face, but was the smiley face prominent among typewriter messages, because that would take away from the whole effect.

  25. Uh oh... by phillymjs · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...how long before he finds himself a lawyer, patents a "method of conveying levity via a sequence of characters typed on a keyboard," and sues, well, everyone? :-)

    (Oops!)

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Uh oh... by eggplantpasta · · Score: 1
      Is this prior art (from the original smiley thread)for the slashdot moderation system? Assuming they're into patenting things :-)

      19-Sep-82 18:56 Jeff Shrager at CMU-10A 38521,03,9(6),9(9),1(5),0
      Just signifying that a message is a joke is certainly not sufficient.
      One can develop a taxonomy of bboard message types along several different
      dimensions. Also, where a continuum is preferable to a taxonomy (such as
      where humor value is at issue) one can similarly use a scale to indicate
      where along that scale this message lies. Suppose that all dimensions are
      refered to by a ten point scale (we'll use all integers here although one
      can certainly imagine reals in the case of fine grain continuous scales).
      Some dimensions will be bitwise encoded as well.
      Here is a sample of a coding scheme:

      COMMUNITY: (this is a binary scale with a bit position for
      each department totalling about 32 bits)
      TOPIC: (two digits 00-99)
      (00) Political, (01) Scientific, (02) Computer, (03) Meta, etc
      FLAME VALUE: (continuous 0.0-10.0)
      HUMOR VALUE: (0.0-10.0)
      BORDOM VALUE: (0.0-10.0)
      INFORMATIONAL CONTENT: (-10.0 (for queries) to 10.0 (for their answers))

      Note that some of these scales are purely according to the opinion
      of the author. Thus, we provide, also, a confidence scale: to go along
      with each continuous scale (to be enclosed in parens after the value).
      --
      "Don't forget the prunes." L. Francis Herreshoff
    2. Re:Uh oh... by rainwalker · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but......

      Shouldn't your .sig read,
      "Tell me, Mr. Anderson, what good is a post if you are modded '-1, Troll'?"

    3. Re:Uh oh... by Quasiben · · Score: 1

      I would imagine they same thing that happened to Kleenex and Xerox...nothing. Should've gotten himself that lawyer in '82

    4. Re:Uh oh... by paulcammish · · Score: 1
  26. you guys are all wrong by silicon1 · · Score: 0

    the first smiley was this:
    C:\>

  27. Patent pending by maxentius · · Score: 1

    "It's interesting to note that Microsoft and AOL now intercept these character strings and turn them into little pictures."

    Too bad he didn't patent the idea. Ahem.

    --
    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of neurons.
    1. Re:Patent pending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amstrad half beat them to it. The old Hamster PCW had a far bigger character set than Word/Word Pervert at the time and included proper smiley faces, although it didn't do the change automatically.

  28. Just think how that culture has evolved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;-) :-) ;-Q ;-) ;-@

    Aaaah! Smilies everywhere....

  29. 8=====D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? It's a guy with glasses and a big nose laughing.

  30. ET holding a chainsaw... by stienman · · Score: 2

    Forget the smiley, I want the ET holding a chainsaw picture in press format mentioned near the end of the file...

    MMmmmm Aliens and powertools.....

    -Adam

    "...just then a talking chicken told him to shut up - we knew it was all over after that..."

  31. RFC? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2

    Come on, someone must have written one!

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:RFC? by undeg+chwech · · Score: 3, Informative
    2. Re:RFC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I find interesting is that, if you follow the back-trail of obsolete RFCs from this one, they get more and more technical.

      So I guess the average Internet user really *is* getting less and less sophisticated. :-(. Soon this RFC will read like an AOL sales brochure.

  32. Trademark by silvwolf · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Trademark by DinkyDoorknob · · Score: 1

      Guess that trademark can be challenged now -- I saw a 'frownie' in that original Fahlman thread, and I'd say that counts as prior art.

    2. Re:Trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior-art is for patents, not trademarks?

      Do you think McDonalds are worried by the 1000's of years of Scottish people by that name?
      Are Ford suddenly worried because people have been walking across the the shallow parts of rivers since rivers were invented?

    3. Re:Trademark by falzer · · Score: 1

      :-(

  33. Moderators, it's not offtopic! by BlowCat · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not interesting and not funny, but please use your moderation points on something that really deserves to be moderated up or down.

    1. Re:Moderators, it's not offtopic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like your post! DOWN! DOWN!

    2. Re:Moderators, it's not offtopic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You offtopic blowhard!

      Someone fucking mod his azz into cheesewhiz.

  34. Leftists of the world - get angry. by (void*) · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was :-) and not (-:. How ... ungauche! :(

    1. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 5, Funny

      The backwards ones confuse me - i mean, what the hell is this?

      >:{

      since ppl started doing them upside down, the complicated ones become unreadable

      someone sorta said this, but maybe we need an RFC or a smiley standards (someone email w3 quick!)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by mosch · · Score: 5, Funny

      )-: damn you, you directionalist bastard.

    3. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by whovian · · Score: 4, Funny

      what the hell is this?

      A female body sculptor flexing ;-)

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    4. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by medscaper · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean 'directionless'?

      --
      Any sufficiently well-organized Government is indistinguishable from bullshit.
    5. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Syn404 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I've been using the (: smiley for a few years now, but I'm not left-handed. Essentially, I started doing this when various instant messengers and other programs began interpreting :) as an irritating little graphic of a horrible looking smiley. Somehow, the text smiley just seems more accurate to me, so I flipped it to evade that. These days, some services unfortunately have already caught on to the backwards smileys, so now it's little more than a symbol of unique-ness around most places. But it's really grown on me. (:

    6. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about this: :-(-:

      or this:

      (-:-) | (:) | :(:

      --
      ^_^
    7. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2
      Name that movie:

      |-o-| [-o-] |-o-| ... . .. ><

      "You're all clear, kid!"

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    8. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen the output of chat when dialling up on Linux? The output starts (-: chat: ...

    9. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

      (-: Smilies en Espa-ol :-)

      --
      __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    10. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      STAR WARS :)))

      (-o-) (-oO-)

      --
      ^_^
    11. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The backwards ones confuse me - i mean, what the hell is this?

      >:{



      Looks like an upset rabbit to me... >:)
    12. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like a guy with a moustache and a unibrow. when read from right to left.

    13. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      HEY! :-(-:

      My sisters are siamese twins! The last thing they need is to be mocked through emoticons!!

    14. Re:Leftists of the world - get angry. by fonetik · · Score: 1

      M.C. Esher does smileys?

      -Tom

  35. Medical Hazard? by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny


    It is rumored that Scott Fahlman and his original group currently have persistent neck problems due to the long-term practice of leaning to the left to read text emotion indicators.

    For this reason, they have allegedly proposed "vertical ASCII" so that they can be read upright.

    (-:

    1. Re:Medical Hazard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is like Shaq and his taco neck sydrome.

  36. Smileys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

    (This post, pertaining to beowulf clusters, is certified by me, Anonymous Coward, to be a 100% authentic and genuine beowulf troll post. All other posts in this thread pertaining to beowulf clusters are IMPOSTERS, and the reader is cautioned that clearance to imagine a beowulf cluster of the items to which this post pertains (specifically: "Smileys") is hereby granted only after reading THIS specific beowulf troll post.)

  37. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... [PREVIEW!] by gilroy · · Score: 2

    But since they used angle brackets, which eventually HTML also used, they were doomed to obsolesence... after all, posting them on slashdot is way too complicated. :)

  38. My plan is missing one crucial piece... by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

    a time machine. Maybe then I can rid the world of the emoticons. Foolish emoticons, the autobots were only the beginning of your worries...

    1. Re:My plan is missing one crucial piece... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      damn you! Now I have to choose between going back in time to kill the smiley guy before he made hia post, or your, before you preempted my joke.

  39. ha ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really funny people (like me) do deliver jokes deadpan. It's called "dry" (or "wry") humor. Check out Steven Wright for an extreme example.

  40. what about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the first "LOL"? ?

  41. next project by jsse · · Score: 1

    is to get the bastard who posted the earliest goatse.cx link in /.

    1. Re:next project by scott1853 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, the search doesn't go back far enough. But there's been about 1250 posts referencing goatse.cx in the last 14 months.

    2. Re:next project by caca_phony · · Score: 1

      The Wipo Troll

      --
      ...and this lie crawls out of its mouth: 'I, the state, am the people.'
  42. Purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Maybe we should adopt a convention of putting a star (*) in the subject
    field of any notice which is to be taken as a joke."

    So the smiley is the digital rimshot to lighten up!

  43. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by singularity · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I very much agree. I still refuse to use "emoticon", instead relying on the types of things I first used on BBS's back in the very early 90's.

    People I speak with on AIM still have to ask what <g> stands for.

    I have added, over the years, some of my own, including <Laughter>, <Shudder>, and <Yawn>

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  44. Been there, done that.. by joshua404 · · Score: 1
    ...how long before he finds himself a lawyer, patents a "method of conveying levity via a sequence of characters typed on a keyboard," and sues, well, everyone? :-)

    Despair, Inc. has held the trademark on the :-( for some time, now.

    Read all about it.

    1. Re:Been there, done that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But woulodn't this guy's post be prior art? Not only does he show the :-) but also the :-(.

    2. Re:Been there, done that.. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      No, because the Despair trademark only applied to greeting cards, posters and art prints.

    3. Re:Been there, done that.. by joshua404 · · Score: 1
      No, because the Despair trademark only applied to greeting cards, posters and art prints.

      Yes, but Despair has threatened to sue (well, is -pretending- to threaten to sue as their site is parody) everyone on the Internet that uses the
      :-( face. anyway, it's all silly.

    4. Re:Been there, done that.. by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Yes, but Despair has threatened to sue (well, is -pretending- to threaten to sue as their site is parody) everyone on the Internet that uses the :-( face.

      As we saw in the Felton case, pretending to threaten to sue doesn't mean anything.

  45. Smiley Haiku (The first?) by roelbj · · Score: 1


    Pray tell, smiley face
    Colon and parenthesis
    How am I to feel?

  46. More Info by willpost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "By the early 1980's, the Computer Science community at Carnegie Mellon was making heavy use of online bulletin boards or "bboards". These were a precursor of today's newsgroups, and they were an important social mechanism in the department - a place where faculty, staff, and students could discuss the weighty matters of the day on an equal footing. Many of the posts were serious: talk announcements, requests for information, and things like "I've just found a ring in the fifth-floor men's room. Who does it belong to?" Other posts discussed topics of general interest, ranging from politics to abortion to campus parking to keyboard layout (in increasing order of passion). Even in those days, extended "flame wars" were common."

    "Given the nature of the community, a good many of the posts were humorous (or attempted humor). The problem was that if someone made a sarcastic remark, a few readers would fail to get the joke, and each of them would post a lengthy diatribe in response. That would stir up more people with more responses, and soon the original thread of the discussion was buried. In at least one case, a humorous remark was interpreted by someone as a serious safety warning."

    "This problem caused some of us to suggest (only half seriously) that maybe it would be a good idea to explicitly mark posts that were not to be taken seriously. After all, when using text-based online communication, we lack the body language or tone-of-voice cues that convey this information when we talk in person or on the phone. Various "joke markers" were suggested, and in the midst of that discussion it occurred to me that the character sequence :-) would be an elegant solution - one that could be handled by the ASCII-based computer terminals of the day. So I suggested that. In the same post, I also suggested the use of :-( to indicate that a message was meant to be taken seriously, though that symbol quickly evolved into a marker for displeasure, frustration, or anger." -Scott E. Fahlman - the inventor of the smiley

    Smiley Lore

    1. Re:More Info by solferino · · Score: 2

      Many of the posts were serious: talk announcements, requests for information, and things like "I've just found a ring in the fifth-floor men's room. Who does it belong to?"

      ... not sure if i lost my cock ring in the men's room i would come forward to claim it

  47. But what about... by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

    ...the first penis bird?

    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
  48. Great, now someone will patent it. by dfay · · Score: 1

    It'll start a new kind of patent, the "email method" patent. And the the patent examiner won't be able to find any prior art, even though he tried really really hard.

  49. Twenty Years of :-) by QuantumWeasel · · Score: 1
    \begin{ mode_:-) }

    So I assume there will a fitting observance in about a week's time? Landmarks like this must be celebrated!
    Happy birthday, Smiley!

    \end{ mode_:-) }

  50. And the search goes on ... by Bob+Loblaw · · Score: 1

    ... for the first (Troll, -1)

  51. First recorded instance of RMS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    speaking out in favor of spam
    boring people in a public forum
    looking for a date (shudder)

    And get this classic quote:

    "It has just been suggested that we impose someone's standards on us"

    I guess he changed his mind about that being a bad thing.

    Found at
    http://www.templetons.com/brad/spamreact.html

    From: RMS at MIT-AI (Richard M. Stallman)
    Subject: MSGGROUP# 697 Some Thoughts about advertising
    To: stefferud at USC-ISI

    1) I didn't receive the DEC message, but I can't imagine I would have been bothered if I have. I get tons of uninteresting mail, and system announcements about babies born, etc. At least a demo MIGHT have been interesting.

    2) The amount of harm done by any of the cited "unfair" things the net has been used for is clearly very small. And if they have found any people any jobs, clearly they have done good. If I had a job to offer, I would offer it to my friends first. Is this "evil"? Must I advertise in a paper in every city in the US with population over 50,000 and then go to all of them to interview, all in the name of fairness? Some people, I am afraid, would think so. Such a great insistence on fairness would destort everyone's lives and do much more harm than good. So I state unashamedly that I am in favor of seeing jobs offered via whatever.

    3) It has just been suggested that we impose someone's standards on us because otherwise he MIGHT do so. Well, if you feel that those standards are right and necessary, go right ahead and support them. But if you disagree with them, as I do, why hand your opponents the victory on a silver platter? By the suggested reasoning, we should always follow the political views that we don't believe in, and especially those of terrorists, in anticipation of their attempts to impose them on us. If those who think that the job offers are bad are going to try toprevent them, then those of us who think they are unrepugnant should uphold our views. Besides, I doubt that anyone can successfully force a site from outside to impose censorship, if the people there don't fundamentally agree with the desirability of it.

    4) Would a dating service for people on the net be "frowned upon" by DCA? I hope not. But even if it is, don't let that stop you from notifying me via net mail if you start one.

  52. Microsoft Patents "The Smile" by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    Shortly after Microsoft finished patenting ones and zeros, Microsoft decided to patent "The Smile" and "The Frown". By owning the rights to these two figures, Microsoft also owns the rights to the ":", the "-", the "(", and the ")" characters.

    Microsoft intends to capitalize on their exclusive rights to the "-" character, and sue Linux users for using them in escape characters without paying tribute to Microsoft.

    In addition, Microsoft plans to sue AOL for use of "The Smile", and estimates a total of 1 trillion dollars should be given back to Microsoft due to the approximately 1 thousand "Smiley things" which the average AOL user appears to use on a daily basis.

    Also, Microsoft plans to sue all software which uses the "-" (AKA "The Nose") operator in their code without paying Microsoft.

    The list just goes on...

    1. Re:Microsoft Patents "The Smile" by hsa · · Score: 1

      :-( is patented by Despair Inc.

      I guess :-) is still free, so go for it!

      --Harri

    2. Re:Microsoft Patents "The Smile" by bsartist · · Score: 2

      Sigh. You'd think that sooner or later, people would eventually realize that there's a difference between patents, copyrights, and trademarks.

      :-(

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  53. 31337 by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    now if only we could find the first case of l33t speak.

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
    1. Re:31337 by fuzz6y · · Score: 1

      I think that distinction goes to B1FF.

      --
      If you're going to be elitist, it would help to be elite.
  54. That reminds me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...of the first time that I tried to draw one in real life.

    I had just gotten into Usenet (this was 93) and was grading quizzes. I went to draw a smiley because a student got a perfect grade, and caught myself drawing it sideways! :-)

  55. Re:First Giant Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get rid of giant internet assholes easy. All you gotta do is uncheck the option in yer slashprefs to see posts by Katz or that cockslapper michael.

  56. 1970s and earlier probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    When I was in the Air Force in the mid 70s, I was stationed at Patrick AFB as a weather tty op. We'd exchange chit-chat with other ops on the wx net and jokes were often punctuated with "hi hi" or a :)

    The smiley undoubtedly pre-dates my tour. If you think it was invented in 1980s, you are wrong.

    1. Re:1970s and earlier probably by MyHair · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you think it was invented in 1980s, you are wrong.

      I agree. Unlike you, I don't recall as specificly when I first saw smileys, but there were so many BBSes whose messages are lost, and some of those BBSes had live chat. DARPAnet likely had its share of college chatters. (I wasn't even familiar with TTY's except I thought they were just for the deaf.) It's incredibly pompous for this guy to think he found the first smiley and for the other guy to claim he invented it.

      The way I see it, anything I can think of or do has already been thought of and done long before I was born. Okay, advancing technology allows a few new "first"s, but they are infinitesimally rare, and somebody thought of it before you, anyway.

      The only interesting thing I found about this article is the obsolescence of the data storage, but that's a horse than been beaten a few times before. At least now we have CDs, and those will last us for the next few hundred years. :-)

      By the way, I was very anti-smiley for YEARS. I think I had been using BBSes and the internet for 16 years before I finally sold my soul and used a smiley. (I believe I used <sigh> and similar angle-bracketed expressions, but not smileys.) It's too late for me, but you can still be saved.

    2. Re:1970s and earlier probably by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how much of it goes back to newsmen, who would have naturally had all kinds of shorthand from the first teletypes?

    3. Re:1970s and earlier probably by PiratePTG · · Score: 1

      I graduated high school in '79 and remember seeing the :) on a printout in our "computer science" class. The "computer lab" was an ASR33 running 300 baud over a dialup to the local community college.

      I have to agree with AC.... It predates the 80's....

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
    4. Re:1970s and earlier probably by Cynbe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Definitely. I introduced smileys to the Seattle
      BBS scene in 1981 from the ARPAnet, and while
      they were new to local Seattle BBS users isolated
      from the ARPAnet, they were old hat nationally at
      that point.

      Anyone seriously looking for the first smiley
      should at minimum search the SF-LOVERS archives.
      It is reputedly the first big ARPAnet mailing
      list, and was certainly one of them. I believe
      it started about 1975+-2 years; I was on it on
      and off in the late 70s. I would be amazed if
      its archives didn't show lots of smileys predating
      1982. 1982 was when I got sick of ARPAnet and
      took a half-decade vacation from it. :)

    5. Re:1970s and earlier probably by worthb · · Score: 1
      When I was in the Air Force in the mid 70s, I was stationed at Patrick AFB as a weather tty op. We'd exchange chit-chat with other ops on the wx net and jokes were often punctuated with " hi hi " or a :)
      Isn't it interesting to see how things evolve over the years. So, the original origin of "ha ha" is really "hi hi" . Fascinating!

      Oops, almost forgot
      ;)
      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
    6. Re:1970s and earlier probably by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      An ASR33 can only run at 110 baud. 300 was for really fast terminals.

    7. Re:1970s and earlier probably by aberson · · Score: 1

      I think "hi hi" actually originates from morse code, where sending it ".... .. .... .." sounds more comical than "ha ha" ".... .- .... .-"

  57. I propose a new search by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    For the first person to use the letter u in place of "you". Even better would be the first person to ask someone to do something very time consuming, and be lazy enough that they wouldn't even write a full word out when asking. :-)

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:I propose a new search by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Troll
      And I propose than when we find him, we kill him. I suggest we start our search in India.

      While we're at it, we'll probably run into the asswipe that came up with 'r' instead of 'are'; 'thx' instead of 'thanks' and 'pls' or 'plz' instead of 'please'. We can kill them too.

      Only then will the world be safe.

      :-)

    2. Re:I propose a new search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do realise that your a zealot hunter, but any particular reasons for starting in India?

    3. Re:I propose a new search by misfit13b · · Score: 1

      plz get a grip, k? thx, m13b ;^P ha ha

  58. zerg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zerg

  59. Not such a discovery by senbei · · Score: 3, Informative

    Since the man himself had it online on his website for ages.

    1. Re:Not such a discovery by worthb · · Score: 1
      Not such a discovery
      Since the man himself had it online online on his website for ages.
      Maybe you should read the pages you refer to before posting. The second page you site above links to this page here describing how the original bullitin board logs were retrieved to support his claim.
      This was retrieved from the spice vax oct-82 backup tape by Jeff Baird on September 10, 2002.
      Since he is quoting work done 3 days ago, I'd hardly say that he's had it on his website for ages.
      --
      "the universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle" - Stapp's Law
  60. ASCII character by ehiris · · Score: 2

    Remembering from the old DOS days there was an ASCII character resembling a smiley face. A lot more efficient and keyboards would have looked cooler if that standard would have been established and keyboards designed to adopt it.

    Maybe line feed should be replaced in POSIX based systems with a smiley. It would be very entertaining to see a smiley at the end of every line in MS ASCII files.

    1. Re:ASCII character by undeg+chwech · · Score: 1

      Unicode has smily faces. 263A and 263B

      (Can't demonstrate, Slash strips them out)

    2. Re:ASCII character by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      When PC/DR/MS-DOS was common, we used to have fun with a terminate and stay resident program that added or removed these smiley characters depending on how much certain commonly used keys were used. The smileys would ricochet around between the lines and words on the screen until they disappeared.

      It was fun watching user reactions (or lack thereof) to the appearing and vanishing faces.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    3. Re:ASCII character by spitzak · · Score: 2
      They sure did. The original IBM PC packed every location in the 256 character lookup table for the text screen with an image, apparently picked almost at random (the ordering of the line drawings is extremely mysterious). Of course you can't have a data stream with these characters and also control information and the fact that programs relied on drawing all these except for cr, lf, tab made it impossible to add escape sequences to the data stream and probably set back computer communications and text peripherals on PC's back several years.

      The smile was put in location 1, there was an inverse-video smile in location 2. There does not appear to be any frowns or other expressions. The newline character \n would draw as an inverse circle. MSDOS line endings would draw as a quarter-note symbol folowed by an inverse circle.

  61. all yer zerg are belong to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    someone set up us the hyrdalisk!

  62. Some people are saying emoticons are not good??? by saskboy · · Score: 1

    The first time I encountered a winking emoticon, I was learning about ;-)iChat I couldn't figure out what the heck ; - and ) were doing with the name. I finally figured out to turn my head to the left.
    Now I use it all the time. It only bugs me when I see someone putting 5 dozen into a conversation. It bothers me too if they make a left handed emoticon like (-: because that poor emoticon is standing on its head.
    So cheer up people. Emoticons aren't ruining punctuation, they are just adding to it. English goes through changes, and this is just one of them. I can think of worse things that could happen to become mainstream in conversations like... "did ya see tat f#$#ing bi*#h tday. man i wanna smak that ho"
    Just think how much easier it is to interpret that writer's mood if they put >:-( after their little rant? ;-)

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  63. Precursor to smiley in 1973 by Broccolist · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ha. I've never seen this mentioned anywhere else on the Internet, but interestingly enough, the smiley occured to the author Vladimir Nabokov (known for the novel Lolita, which incidentally rules) back in 1973. I was reading a book of interviews with him (Strong Opinions) and I started when I saw this bit:

    [asked how he would rank himself among great writers]
    I often think there should exist a special typographical sign for a smile -- some sort of concave mark, a supine round bracket, which I would now like to trace in reply to your question.

    That's Nabokov all right, inadvertently predicting the invention of the smiley 10 years in advance :). Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if it had occured to lots of people, and the smiley has a very long history, if only someone could be bothered to dig it up.

    1. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by Creosote · · Score: 1

      If memory serves, informal missives in the '70s, particularly from teenage girls, were often adorned with handwritten Happy Faces that performed roughly the equivalent paralinguistic function as typewritten smileys would later. The main innovation was the 90-degree rotation that allowed for a sideways ASCII representation.

    2. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this post! :-)))))))))

    3. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by xphread · · Score: 1

      No - I'm sure Al Gore invented the Smiley :D ;~/ (ASCII road accident victum - Patent pending)

    4. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by akb · · Score: 2

      Guess you haven't looked on the smiley originators
      web page.

    5. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

      geesh! someones claiming Prior art already!

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    6. Re:Precursor to smiley in 1973 by namhash · · Score: 1

      Most guys would know that it started before the invent of the toilet. I mean who hasn't peed onto snow or sand and not drawn something.

      Smilely's are only a "level 2" in the difficulty dept. "Level 1" being lines.

  64. What a lovely Rebound :-) by Plasmagrid · · Score: 1

    I believe there was a law suit trying to gone about a year ago of patenting this. I wonder if this would throw that case out?

    1. Re:What a lovely Rebound :-) by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      The trademark -- not a patent -- was by the owner of Demotivators.com, and it was on the :( emoticon (or "frownie"). As far as I know, the trademark is still valid, but fear not. Frownies are available to the public. Check out Demotivators.com, and mind the 1 gross minimum.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  65. MAD Magazine by macbot3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MAD magazine did a bit called "Typewri-Toons" back in the early 60's. I don't remember if they did the smiley, but they did come up with a lot of pictorial representations using only a typewriter.

  66. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    That explains why there were question marks in the answers Alton provided earlier today. I figured he just couldn't type very well.

  67. Re: The First Smiley :-) by Goofy+Gavin · · Score: 1

    ...and here's the last smiley:

    ----------*
    -- a pointy-headed man with goggles, peacefully oblivious to the spider which dangles above his head. when that smiley is needed, the smiley's evolution will be complete.

  68. I found the invention of Karma! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From: Scott E Fahlman

    I propose that the following character sequence for joke markers: :-)

    Read it sideways. Actually, it is probably more economical to mark

    things that are NOT jokes, given current trends. For this, use :-(

    =

    19-Sep-82 18:56 Jeff Shrager at CMU-10A 38521,03,9(6),9(9),1(5),0

    Just signifying that a message is a joke is certainly not sufficient.

    One can develop a taxonomy of bboard message types along several different

    dimensions. Also, where a continuum is preferable to a taxonomy (such as

    where humor value is at issue) one can similarly use a scale to indicate

    where along that scale this message lies. Suppose that all dimensions are

    refered to by a ten point scale (we'll use all integers here although one

    can certainly imagine reals in the case of fine grain continuous scales).

    Some dimensions will be bitwise encoded as well.

    Here is a sample of a coding scheme:

    COMMUNITY: (this is a binary scale with a bit position for

    each department totalling about 32 bits)

    TOPIC: (two digits 00-99)

    (00) Political, (01) Scientific, (02) Computer, (03) Meta, etc

    FLAME VALUE: (continuous 0.0-10.0)

    HUMOR VALUE: (0.0-10.0)

    BORDOM VALUE: (0.0-10.0)

    INFORMATIONAL CONTENT: (-10.0 (for queries) to 10.0 (for their answers))

    Note that some of these scales are purely according to the opinion

    of the author. Thus, we provide, also, a confidence scale: to go along

    with each continuous scale (to be enclosed in parens after the value).

  69. now the REAL question by radiashun · · Score: 1

    who was the first sick freak that used 8==D and (.)(.) in a post?

  70. Japanese Smileys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been intreuged by how in asian cultures Japanese Smiles have been different. for example:

    ^_^ Happy ;_; Sad
    =_= Sleepy

    \(^o^)/ BANZAI!

    There are many others and I really like these better as you don't have to tilt your head to the side or anything. Because Japanese also use a different character encoding (65,536 characters to our teeny-tiny 256) they can get some really creative emotes. I wonder who was the first to come up with the Japanese ones?

    O_o =^.^=

    1. Re:Japanese Smileys by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      i have never seen any japanese people using them, i have only seen anime fans using them because they somewhat resemble anime faces.

    2. Re:Japanese Smileys by jth1234567 · · Score: 1


      Actually, japanese people use ^^ a lot in online games... first time I ever saw that was around 98 in Ultima Online.

      I could be totally wrong, but I always figured the original ^^ was meant to resemble 'hehe' written in hiragana (the character for 'he' looks pretty much like ^, at least more that than any other ascii char).

  71. Re: The First Smiley :-) by Goofy+Gavin · · Score: 1

    ugh... must learn to preview. "...and here's the last smiley:

    ----------* {8-)

    -- a pointy-headed man with goggles, peacefully oblivious to the spider which dangles above his head. when that smiley is needed, the smiley's evolution will be complete."

    :( :( :(

  72. CMU by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

    Woo! Take that, MIT! In your face!! :-)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
    1. Re:CMU by mike3411 · · Score: 0

      Damn straight, CMU /. trolls represent!
      Between this and that guy who made hardrives play music (and successfully hosted video that everyone was actually capable of accessing), I'd say CMU has a clear monopoly on the kind of random, cool, and often (mostly) pointless stuff /. _loves_.
      By the way, MCS rules.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    2. Re:CMU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      overrated? how the fuck can it be overrated? it wasn't modded up, you fuck, it was just a default level post. fucking mods. go ahead and mod this down, biznatchs.

  73. Best research done by Microsoft? by Evil+Attraction · · Score: 1

    Looking at the server address for this "research project" (research.microsoft.com), I think this must qualify to be the best research done by any Microsoft-related. Ever. Keep it coming, Microsoft. You might be the first one to figure out who wrote Micro$oft.

    1. Re:Best research done by Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  74. Re::-( (pad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wonderful

  75. Online archaeology by dennison_uy · · Score: 1

    "...Interesting methodology and a lot of work went into the search..."

    First, go to google and enter: smiley emoticon inventor
    Then, click on "I'm Feeling Lucky"

    Guess whose page pops up? =)

    --
    Take off every 'sig'!
    All your 'sig' are belong to us!
  76. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  77. Bollocks! Smileys were around in the 60s w/PLATO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry to burst your balloon, but the use of smiley's
    were around in the 60s and 70s in the first online community, PLATO (http://www.platopeople.com). It was extremely common to use them in Notes (threaded discussion areas) and Pnotes (email).

    PLATO was an extremely active online community and some of the founders went on to CMU to work on Andrew. Bruce Sherwood, if I got the name right. Make your own decision on where smiley's came from.

  78. The first usage of "pr0n" according to google... by Lordfly · · Score: 1
    --
    hookers and grits.
  79. Parallel Evolution by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's a heckuva piece of work, but the smiley appears to have been generated by parallel evolution. Several people seem to have come up with it independently. I first encountered it on Usenet around the same time period. I don't remember who it was who suggested it; all I remember is that it was a woman and hence couldn't have been Scott Fahlman.

    1. Re:Parallel Evolution by Peyna · · Score: 2

      I think in geography it's referred to as independent parallel invention. This would be a more appropriate term in this case.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Parallel Evolution by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1
      I don't remember who it was who suggested it; all I remember is that it was a woman and hence couldn't have been Scott Fahlman.

      Not to cast aspersions on Mr. Fahlman, but how sure are you? I mean, Wendy Carlos was once Walter Carlos, y'know. Damn, this post can't go without a :-) or I'll be in court for slander.

  80. Re:Some people are saying emoticons are not good?? by Kredal · · Score: 1

    Hey, I always smile backwards. Have been for like 8 years. (:

    Deal with it! d:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  81. The Smiley Undermined by Snafoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Every IM and gooey IRC client these days is replacing the noble ASCII smile with the hideous rictus of a yellow dot. Even punctuation is threatened
    by the forces of Disnification.

    --
    - undoware.ca
    1. Re:The Smiley Undermined by AnnaBlack · · Score: 1

      Actually... this is sort of changing the nature of smilies. Ever noticed how the icon that, say, MSN Messenger uses to replace the :( is that bit more expressive? I used to use a Linux IM client that couldn't handle the "emoticons", so I'd type :( meaning "a bit sad" and the reader would see this expressive face with not only a sad mouth, but eyes looking to heaven.

      That's a rather different expression than I intended to convey. Some graphic designer at Microsoft has overloaded the :( so that it becomes far more expressive but also far more limiting.

      Conspiracy theorists... go!

      Anna

    2. Re:The Smiley Undermined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, try writing perl-code/lisp in a yahoo chatroom....

  82. Hoax?? by VAXman · · Score: 2

    This has got to be a hoax. First of all, it is dated almost exactly twenty years before today, so as to set a big milestone this year. Second, I find it impossible to believe the methodology used to get retrieve the message, that a university would have 20 year old backups and still have the people around with the expertise to extract them. Finally, I find the contention that this is the origination of the smiley pretty supsicious -- the fact that it started in a single message on an isolated message board and just a decade later was on every network (e.g. Usenet, GEnie, CIS, etc.) and understood by every computer user. More likely it has sprung up independently many different times in different places, since it's a pretty obvious invention.

    1. Re:Hoax?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, this is not the first, just one of the first...

      It could be THE FIRST.

    2. Re:Hoax?? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      And the link is at research.microsoft.com.

      We all know that Slashdot is whoring themselves out to MS now, with huge MS Visual Studio ads. I bet this is just an attempt to log the IP address of every Slashdot reader. Best to keep an eye on those troublemakers, right?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:Hoax?? by peterb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hi, please don't be a huge raging dickhead. You're completely, utterly, and didactically wrong.

      I used to work for the CMU CS facilities department; we did make all our backups on 9 track tapes, they are kept forever, and it was a huge pain in the ass for Jeff to track down the relevant equipment to do the restore. We're lucky he was able to get it restored -- very often, tapes that old just disintegrate, even when stored properly, as these were.

      So don't call friends of mine liars, and I won't call you a vacuous drooling moron, OK?

      And as for how it could spread quickly, don't forget the meme theory of ideas, and the fact that CMU was on Usenet from a hideously early date.

      Note that I'm not affiliated with either CMU (except as an alumni and former co-worker) or Microsoft.

    4. Re:Hoax?? by Jouster · · Score: 1

      Ha! They may try to log my IP address, but I blind-spoof onto foreign networks where my r00t3d boxen never send TCP RST on unrecognized ACKs. I then telepathically transfer the data from the brain of a small monkey I have sitting in front of the consoles of these r00t3d machines into my own head, where I write it down in sexagesimal (base 60) and convert it all by hand into binary represented by the numerals "5" and "j" for zero and one, respectively. Finally, I run a massive bc and sed script on the generated file and throw it into /dev/null, since by merely translating it among mental and binary formats, I have internalized everything I was transferring.

      I've been awake a little too long, methinks.

      Jouster

  83. Smiley is almost 20 years old! by zardie · · Score: 1

    On the 19th in fact, it turns 20 years old, according to this information.

  84. Kibo! by chris_martin · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone know internet lore anymore? James "kibo" perry is the creater and true master of the smiley and can type it so quickly and eligantly that it looks like a real face peering out of the monitor. I'd throw a smiley at the end of that, but it seems a bit redundant. :) See what I mean?
    Kibo is also the owner of the most warlordable .sig file in existance.
    The pdf version of the sig is here:
    ftp://ftp.std.com/pub2/alt.religion.kibolog y/kibo_ sig.pdf

    http://www.kibo.net

    --
    -- Chris Martin, System Administrator
  85. umop apisdn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's funny. i can still remember seeing my first :) on a bbs a LONG time ago and not knowing what it was.
    "turn your head sideways" oh hehe it's a smiley face.

    how about umop apisdn?
    that blew my fucking mind at the time.

  86. Look sidways disclaimer? by aengblom · · Score: 2


    I love that the message (and others of that time period) tell people to "turn sideways"! I can't look at ":-)" without seeing a "smiley".

    The opposite happens to me now when I say "see ya". I actually think CYA.

    Language is a funny thing.

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
    1. Re:Look sidways disclaimer? by Carmody · · Score: 2

      The first time I saw one was in an an email from a friend.

      I wondered why she typed a colon and a right paren, and thought it was a typo.

      Then she made the same typo again in another email.

      Time #3 I finally went "Aaaaaaaaahhh"

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Look sidways disclaimer? by Bastard+Operator+Fro · · Score: 1

      I still think of "CYA" as "Cover your Ass" which is a very appropiate sign off message where I work.

      --
      Shaun Nelson - Bastard Operator (From Hell / For Hire)
  87. Microsoft Research? by hallucination · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Typical slashdot.... Don't give microsoft credit. It's not Mike Jones from microsoft... it's just Mike Jones. If it was any other research house, i'm sure it would have been there. But what else do you expect from Slashdot? I suppose just posting it is a step in the right directection towards no bias news.

  88. It has been brought to my attention... by A+Rabid+Tibetan+Yak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that no-one has mentioned the Denoser project.

    Simply put, if your website is smiley-heavy, you can achieve up to a 33% reduction in bandwidth costs simply by removing the nose from your smiley :).

    OK, that's my contribution to Ancient Geek studies over with...

  89. Heh, nice one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well you proved your point, nobody actually got your joke.

    Delivery is everything!

    1. Re:Heh, nice one by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Amen man, I mean, people are actually flaming him. :-D

  90. Anyone notice.... by T3kno · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The address of the site that points to this!? research.microsoft.com, is that where the 50 bil goes, into finding where the first smily came from? Holy crap, I now know why Windows is the steaming pile of horse excrement that it is.

    --
    (B) + (D) + (B) + (D) = (K) + (&)
  91. To See this in Action by Greyfox · · Score: 2

    Go through "A Modest Proposal" and sprinkle smileys liberally. For extra credit, turn your revised edition in to your English Teacher under the title "A Modernized Proposal." When said teacher chastizes you for plagarism, simply write on the chalkboard ";-)"

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  92. Re::-( (pad) by MaxVlast · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Geez, man. Lighten up. It's just some guy doing something he thought was cool. It's not a directive from Bill to seize the net.culture as MS's own. Just a friendly guy named Mike. Doing something cool. It's fun. Smile.

    --
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
    Max V.
    NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  93. Nifty... sort of... by dgulbran · · Score: 1

    I mean, the article really doesn't go into any detail about how it was determined that this was the first smiley... just the first smiley at CMU... just because this guy first proposed it at CMU then, doesn't mean someone didn't propose it earlier someplace else. I'd love to see a more extensive search to see if that is, indeed, the first smiley...

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
  94. you are an idiot by madenosine · · Score: 1

    sorry, but you are.

    aside from the childish '$', you might have noticed that this was a personal page, as opposed to one of the many research projects at research.microsoft.com, meaning that it was of personal interest.

    1. Re:you are an idiot by sevynd2 · · Score: 0

      Wow must be pretty good. I got 4 mods that is the first time that anyone has wanted to mod my shit that much. 1 good 3 bad ! Anyway the fact that the first smiley post was found was really cool. The fact that it was posted by microsoft R&D regardless of personal site or not is irrelevant. I figure that there R&D needs a little bit more than smiley's to impress me. I am also happy, that you are smart enough to be able to judge someones intelegece level from a one paragraph opinion. That must make you god ;)

      --
      haha .. technology , so overated
    2. Re:you are an idiot by sevynd2 · · Score: 0

      Oh, please point out my misspellings, god of all beings. Dont forget punctuation. All masterfull one. Dick

      --
      haha .. technology , so overated
    3. Re:you are an idiot by madenosine · · Score: 1

      we apparently havent learned anything; this is not a microsoft research (or development) project; it was a personal project by a person who worked for microsoft reasearch

      I figure that there R&D needs a little bit more than smiley's to impress me

      microsoft research is a think tank; it does not care if you are impressed or not. chances are you refuse to read/cannot understand the technical papers on the site anyways.

    4. Re:you are an idiot by sevynd2 · · Score: 0

      Ouch. Chances are I could. However I would be extremly bored with all the microsoft knowledge about how they want to take over the world and such. I am extremly opposed to a comapany that wants to control the content on my computer or your computer or my mothers computer for that fact. If some gentleman paid a little more time to helping his group patch there systems, or research a way to improve the OS systems security. Their idea of security seems to point in the direction of knowing whats on your system. Making sure your a good boy. Hell that is easy enough, now keep the rest of the world off of the operating system and then tell me about your smilies. I am not an idiot like you might want to think. Sice I understood you the first time. I can clearly see that the information was personally related to a microsoft employee. Still doesnt change my point. Also about Microsoft wanting me impressed.... If I am unimpressed by what they come up with then there are thousand more that are also unimpressed. The only people that are impressed by Microsoft are the ones that are blind to the truth. Talk big, walk nothing.

      --
      haha .. technology , so overated
  95. lmfao by fluxrad · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    i'm sorry, but i have to know.

    when was the first penis bird used?

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  96. Oh yeh? Here's one for ya! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (:-O <===8

  97. Yes, but... by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do they ever ask what Repetitive fawning crap goes here... means?

  98. MS's Research and Development! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of researching security holes, or how to make their OS's not suck, they're digging around tapes looking for ascii smilies. Wow. :)

  99. How about the first use of "flame on"/"flame off" by btempleton · · Score: 4, Interesting
    A while ago I researched the history of the term Spam and found interesting things.

    But one thing I would like to find that I dimly remember is the first use (on Arpanet mailing lists in the late 70s) of the Johnny Storm "Flame On!" when getting angry in a posting.

    In those days it was always followed with "Flame Off", though this has sadly gone by the wayside.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  100. Very interesting smileys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the Usenet post in Google:
    (:-) for messages dealing with bicycle helmets
    @= for messages dealing with nuclear war
    oo for somebody's head-lights are on messages
    o>-<|= for messages of interest to women
    ~= a candle, to annotate flaming messages
    These days, "Somebody's headlights are on" messages use the more modern depiction:
    ( o ) ( o ) <-- in the accounting office!!!
    Please don't try this at work!
  101. Smile you've just be slashdoted :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scott E. Fahlman's Home Page :-)[http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~sef/]

  102. some amusing alternative emoticons... by asteinberg · · Score: 2, Funny
    About 10 years ago, my dad found a free copy of a book called "The Secret Guide to Computers" by Russ Walter and threw it my way. The book covered lots of stuff - as the cover declares, it "Guides you through all the applications, from 'Accounting' to 'Zany Sex'." It happens to be where I learned my first programming language - BASIC.

    Anyway, there was a page about emoticons, listing a bunch of variations on the smiley. It's quite amusing. I was going to put them all here, but the lameness filter isn't letting me, so I'll just post a few highlights to whet your appetite and look for a link (here's one; click Internet in the left frame then search the right frame for "smiley"):

    :-)~ I'm drooling.
    :-)-8 I have big breasts.
    :*) I'm drunk.
    %-) I'm dizzy from staring at the screen too long.
    |-O I'm yawning.
    |^O I'm snoring.
    [:-) I'm wearing a Walkman.
    {:-) I wear a toupee,
    }:-) but the wind is blowing it off.
    [:] I'm a robot.
    }:-> I'm being devilish,
    >;-> and lewdly winking.
    E-:-) I'm a ham radio operator.
    C=:-) I'm a chef.
    =|:-)= I'm Uncle Sam.
    --
    The first ever Ultimate Frisbee video game: here (now
  103. "Need" is a strong word. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Books" and personal communications are different environments. Although I do (occasionally) use smileys it doesn't mean that I need to because I have no other way of expressing myself effectively. It simply means that for the particular communication in question I determine the smiley to be an effective method of quickly and easily clarifying meaning. While I could say "Just joking by the way!", a ";)" is just as effective.

    Or perhaps I should compose all my correspondence in sonnet form, just to show I have an impressive "grasp of the written word".......

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  104. The thread is interesting as a whole by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    There are some distinguished CMU profs like Touretzsky, Carbonell, and Thibadeau in those posts.

    I'll bet that one guy with the joke post never thought that this would come back to haunt him two decades later.

  105. Sorry Charlie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I recall back in 1979 that smiley's and other emoticons were in use on Unix and VAX systems....geez, even Bank of America's internal network used them.

    Amazing how many "first appeared" that are purported are just not true...

    1. Re:Sorry Charlie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because there's is too many clueless people around.
      Here on slashdot there is a very small group that actually knows what they're talking about. The rest just want to be "nerd" because they think it's cool...

  106. Uh, you mean emodicon? by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    Smily is a vulger term, right up there with people who say 'lol' and 'rotfifjuadbiacm' or whatever the heck that means.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  107. the most recent smiley on the internet by dirvish · · Score: 1

    :-) ...at least for a few seconds.

  108. the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...online Klingon. }}-[

  109. The huge face mark site in Japan. by hichon · · Score: 1

    Face mark
    Mona
    ASCII art stories
    Japanese fonts are required.:-)

  110. Slashdot invented in the same thread by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone notice that the very next post after Fahlman's invented post moderation? (albeit self moderation) quoted here:


    19-Sep-82 18:56 Jeff Shrager at CMU-10A 38521,03,9(6),9(9),1(5),0
    Just signifying that a message is a joke is certainly not sufficient.
    One can develop a taxonomy of bboard message types along several different
    dimensions. Also, where a continuum is preferable to a taxonomy (such as
    where humor value is at issue) one can similarly use a scale to indicate
    where along that scale this message lies. Suppose that all dimensions are
    refered to by a ten point scale (we'll use all integers here although one
    can certainly imagine reals in the case of fine grain continuous scales).
    Some dimensions will be bitwise encoded as well.
    Here is a sample of a coding scheme:

    COMMUNITY: (this is a binary scale with a bit position for
    each department totalling about 32 bits)
    TOPIC: (two digits 00-99)
    (00) Political, (01) Scientific, (02) Computer, (03) Meta, etc
    FLAME VALUE: (continuous 0.0-10.0)
    HUMOR VALUE: (0.0-10.0)
    BORDOM VALUE: (0.0-10.0)
    INFORMATIONAL CONTENT: (-10.0 (for queries) to 10.0 (for their answers))

    Note that some of these scales are purely according to the opinion
    of the author. Thus, we provide, also, a confidence scale: to go along
    with each continuous scale (to be enclosed in parens after the value).

  111. Purity of writing? by phandel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Agreed. Humor in real life conversation is conveyed not only through words, but also through body language, tone, and context. In text, you have none of the first two, and the third can often be impaired.

    While we're at it, we should add a flashing "Applause" sign to the writers toolchest!

    IOW: We should stop blatantly telling the reader how to feel, and rather improve the writing to convey the emotion. This is of course wrt real writing, rather than droning on /. or IM :-)

  112. I wanna know when... by Tokerat · · Score: 2


    ...the first set of THESE (.)(.) where seen on a computer screen! Spend $50 million on researching THAT, M$FT!

    (Ironically enough, to make that "bodicon" appear correctly on /. I have to use the <TT> tag...pronounce by spelling)

    And one for the road -> :-)

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  113. I wonder when the first japanese smiley appeared? by greentoad · · Score: 1

    I wonder when the Japanese/asian smileys which are better looking than the standard smiley came about, for those who haven't seen them, here're a few:

    ^o^ the laughing smiley

    -_-; the upset smiley

    ^L^ the big nosed face smiley

    -o- the yawning smiley

    ^^;;;; the sweating smiley

    etc etc

  114. I rather disagree by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So much in most languages, certianly English, relies on tone. This is something that simply cannot be conveyed through text. In something like a novel you can take the time to rewrite things such that the language truly indicates what you mean to convey, and you also have teh benefit of speaking about a character's actions (eg. "And that was smart", Jim remarked with a smirk). With realtime communiactions you have no such advantages. YOu have to come up with your response quickly, and have little ability to comment on them. A simley is sucha device. YOu can indicate the general intended tone of a remark. I can think of many phrases that I would use that could mean many different things depending on how I said them. For example:

    "Well you reall screwed that up."

    Now if I said that in a jovial, joking, manner, it would mean that I'm kidding, you really didn't screw up that bad, I'm just harassing you. If I said that in a neutral, professional tone, it woul be a comment, that you did indeed mess something up. If I yelled that, it would eman that not only did you do it, but it pissed me off personally.

    While I can't truly convery that in a qucik text message, smileys can help. If I just typed it as is, it would probably be intereprted in the neutral sense I spoke of, and the person would believe that I was really indicating that I believed they ahd sincerely screwed up. Adding a :) would let them know that I am just kidding and playing with them.

    1. Re:I rather disagree by eric6 · · Score: 1
      the main thing your comment reminds me of is the interpretation of a script. Even with some description:


      JOHN
      (angrily)
      How could you?

      there are thousands of ways to say the line.

      --

      --
      fight global cooling

  115. That means the smiley is 20 years old! In *6* days by Saiai+Hakutyoutani · · Score: 1

    Hey! Let's celebrate next thursday or something ;) The smiley will actually be 20 years old :) ;) Ne ;)

  116. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... [PREVIEW!] by mike3411 · · Score: 1


    and it case that doesn't show up, why the fuck doesn't /. accept plaintext properly?

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  117. You're missing something by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

    Writing a letter (as people did in the olden days, or so I am told) is hardly the same as typing messages in ICQ, email or IRC. When one writes a letter, one has the time to carefully weigh the thrust of each sentence so that ones meaning isn't lost upon the reader. On line communication is often more like to spoken conversation rather than written communication. Real people don't speak like characters in a book. In normal conversation, people use half-sentences, they slur over bits of words, and most importantly people can see and gauge each other's emotions. Similarly, in on-line conversation, people use abbreviations and they make spelling mistakes that they don't care to correct. What is missing is facial expressions, and smileys fill that gap.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  118. In a way this has been done. by MonkeyMagic · · Score: 2

    Franklin Loufrani, who is credited with creating the original smiley to indicate good news in some European newspapers in 1972. See more here.

    He apparently has them trademarked in various contries and has threatened to defend the trademark" though I suspect it might be a bit late to do so in the UK after the acid house craze. (Incidentally, this article to provides a different explanation for the history of the smiley.)

    See World Smile Corp if you want to use the trademark.

    1. Re:In a way this has been done. by WEFUNK · · Score: 2

      Franklin Loufrani, who is credited with creating the original smiley...

      Actually, as mentioned in a few of your links, the late Harvey Ball is widely credited as originally inventing the smiley in 1963 for a local insurance company, and his smiley face design became popular in the sixties and seventies. Sometimes they are even known as "Harvey balls". He was paid $45 dollars for his creation but was happy to see it so widely used for free. The story then takes on a ring familiar to slashdotters...

      Loufrani was a french journalist who claims to have independently come up with the smiley in 1968 and proceeded to trademark it in over 80 countries and has made millions from licensing and litigation. In the US I believe that Loufrani's trademark is for Ball's happy face with the word "SMILEY" under it.

      Ball was quite upset when he found out a few years ago that Loufrani was claiming credit for the design and was threatening companies like "Joe Boxer" with lawsuits. Rather than taking a chance in court to firmly place the smiley in the public domain, before he passed away last year he started World Smile Corporation, which holds its own trademark for a smiley face with his signature and donates all proceeds to charity.

      After all, smiles just want to be free...

      --
      My next sig will be ready soon, but friends can beat the rush!
  119. Too late! by stefanb · · Score: 1

    They already did!

  120. Evolution of GRAMMAR! :^) by pepperino · · Score: 0, Troll

    evry1 nos that w/o im on the net that u would not have the kewl stuff 2day that evry1 reads and I 4 1 could not do w/o all the kewl smiley faces that make me smile IRL when I read the kewl stuff my frend mails me hahaha look its a frog in a blender LOL LMAO :)

  121. Geez, I was behind the times by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    I was still using the pathetic as late as 1985. So were most everyone else on the BBS's I frequented.

    I don't really recall when the :-) became widely used, but I didn't think it was before around 92. at least not in my circles...

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  122. Now that they've dug up this post... by marnanel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope they're saving all the posts around it-- not just that thread, but all the backup tapes. It's hard to know what will become worth knowing in a few decades' time-- I doubt anyone would have thought that Fahlman's post would be significant twenty years on.

    I'm sure Google would take them. They've got so much old stuff already, and they already archive significant amounts of non-news-based discussion.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  123. Watch out, we'll get sued!!! by ksp · · Score: 1

    http://www.smileylicensing.com/about/about_03.html

    "Smiley has over 300 partners worldwide who manufacture and distribute Smiley branded consumer products for babies, children, teens and adults."

    Are any of you paying royalties to Smiley Licensing?

    Here's my $0.02 worth: :-)

    --
    What is the sound of one hand clapping?
    cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
  124. 30th birthday by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

    So if this really is the very first occurrence of the smiley, it will be its 20th birthday in exactly 6 days (19 september).

    Of course, there's no way of knowing for sure this was its first use; probably scores of people got the idea to use :-) or similar.

    1. Re:30th birthday by avocade · · Score: 1

      There's no way to know exactly that Jesus was born on December 24, but that's not stopping them.

      I say we give the Smiley his(?) best 20th birthday come next Thursday. I for one will honor him by using the first smiley :-) instead of the now commonly used :) for the whole day.

      What else could we do?

      --
      avocade.com
      In a free and open internet, who needs Windows
    2. Re:30th birthday by Negatyfus · · Score: 1

      Actually, Jesus birthday has nothing to do with December 24th or Christmas, other than that the protestant church used the date of an existing heathen festival to lure more Christians to their cause.

    3. Re:30th birthday by avocade · · Score: 1

      Is that a fact, or something you say because you dislike christianity? I'm just asking.

      --
      avocade.com
      In a free and open internet, who needs Windows
    4. Re:30th birthday by BeeShoo · · Score: 1

      It's a fact as much as anything in history can truly be considered a fact. Especially when the events were that long ago.
      Many Christian holidays were either created, or evolved over time to try to win over the Pagans. To do so, they very closely emulated many of their symbols and festivals.

    5. Re:30th birthday by pianophile · · Score: 1

      Is that a fact

      It is a fact. The church "fathers" who decided to co-opt the various pagan winter solstice celebrations (Saturnalia, Sol Invictus, probably others) had no more idea when Jesus was born than you or I do. They picked Dec. 25 because people were already celerating the birth of Mithra (a sun god) on that day.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    6. Re:30th birthday by avocade · · Score: 1

      Well, they say you learn new things everyday :) Very interesting indeed.

      Must say that I feel very welcome here. It was my first post on slashdot today, and I'm glad to see that this is a forum where serious people can discuss serious matters without being flamed.

      Yeah, yeah, so give me a "Score:0" and "OffTopic" then, nevermind :)

      --
      avocade.com
      In a free and open internet, who needs Windows
  125. Re::-( (pad) by flacco · · Score: 3, Funny
    There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.

    We've got bigger problem's to worry about.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  126. Anniversary of smiley by Truckle · · Score: 1

    That makes the 19th of September the 20th anniversary ;)

  127. So now we know the bastard's name... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    So now we know the name of the bastard who invented smilies. Bastard. Allows emotions to be conveyed in plain text, does it? People have been expressing emotions in plain text for millenia without any fucking colons and brackets tacked onto the end to show whether it's funny or not.
    Stupid bastard.
    So now we just need to know the bastard's address, so we can go round there and mete out some suitable Jay and Silent Bob style revenge on the bastard.
    Next we'll track down and get medieval on the arses of those sub-literate fucks who spell everything like Prince song titles.

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  128. I created a smiley using a typewriter in 78 by emptybody · · Score: 2

    My sister and I used to "type pictures" on my parents old suitcase typewriter. We made all sorts of pictures. I wish I still had some around.

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  129. Re::-( (pad) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's not what it used to be....

  130. My fisrt smiley by eldimo · · Score: 1

    I was first introduced to another kind of smiley. As I was hanging out in a university BBS (circa 1987), people frequently used *\/*. Try to imagine two cheeks with the lips smiling. It does not look much like a smiley on the web, but you could clearly see it on a VT100 terminal. It also had the advantage that you didn't need to turn you head sideway to see it. :)

  131. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, what a rebel! Too cool. I want to be like you.

  132. Given current trends by fr2ty · · Score: 1


    I wonder what the "given current trends" are they were talking about in the NG.

    Actually, it is probably more economical to mark things that are NOT jokes, given current trends.

    Is it something Mike B. Jones won't tell us on a Microbloat Site?

    1. Re:Given current trends by tweek · · Score: 1

      I think maybe they were talking about people telling TOO MANY jokes and without any sort of marker, others being able to tell the difference. Of course I think it only applied to that thread.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  133. Smiley evolution by p3d0 · · Score: 2

    I find it interesting that the upside-down smiley (-: was first seen less than 30 hours after the smiley's invention.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Smiley evolution by geekoid · · Score: 2

      and the first religous war over which is correct happen 30 seconds later... ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  134. My favourite smilee by PenguinLord · · Score: 1

    }(;) - It means Kiss my ass

  135. Some help... by jstell · · Score: 1

    I've had to use Transl8it on more than one occasion to try to figure out what someone was saying.

    So much for the burden of communication resting on the sender, rather than the receiver...

  136. It Figures!! by azadrozny · · Score: 1
    Why is it that a backup tape can sit in a closet for 20 years, so some guy can research the first simley, but when my HD crashes I cannot retrieve information stored on tape less than a week ago? Murphy's Law I guess?!?

    Happy 20th Birthday to the Smiley :-)

  137. Ah Crud. by tjensor · · Score: 1

    I was just about to patent the smiley. I guess this is prior art.

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
  138. Ob: Simpsons Quote by unorthod0x · · Score: 1

    Comic Book Store Guy: "There is no emoticon adequate to express what I'm feeling right now."

    CABF02 - The Computer Wore Menace Shoes

  139. Earliest *online* smiley maybe, not first ever by MoNickels · · Score: 3, Informative

    The earliest (not first: you can never precisely say which was first) recorded smiley in print discovered so far was found by etymologist and word researcher Barry Popik who posted this message to the email list of the American Dialect Society:

    http://listserv.linguistlist.org/cgi-bin/wa?A2=i nd 0110B&L=ads-l&P=R4596

    [begin quote]

    This continues discussion of the pictograph known as the "smiley." It's authorship was credited to the late Harvey Ball (who drew it in the 1960s). "Smiley" is in an ad in the NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE, 10 March 1953, pg. 20, cols. 4-6. See for yourself. The ad is for the film LILI, with the "delightful" Leslie Caron. The "World Premiere Today" is at the Trans-Lux 52nd on Lexington. The film opened nationwide, and this ad possibly ran in many newspapers.

    Today

    You'll laugh :)
    You'll cry :(
    You'll love (Heart-shaped face--ed.)
    _Lili_

    [end quote]

    --

    Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

    1. Re:Earliest *online* smiley maybe, not first ever by MoNickels · · Score: 2

      I'd like to retract my comment above about the possible earliest use of a smiley, or emoticon, in print.

      Etymologist Barry Popik, who found the advertisement I mention, was in China, Tibet and Mongolia (and is still there, I think), but I sent him a message asking him to confirm that it *was* a punctuation-based smiley and not a yellow-faced-Harvey-Ball-type smiley. In his original message, he used ":)" to desginate a smiley that appeared in the ad--but he now confirms (from the airport at Ulaan Baatar, no less) that it *was not* the emoticon. He was merely using the emoticon to render the Harvey Ball-type smiley, the yellow round one. Therefore, my comment was misinformed, and the 1953 advertisement should *not* be considered an early appearance of the now-familiar ":)".

      --

      Wordnik, a dictionary project which aims to collect

  140. No monsters in my subjectline... by morie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Aaaahhhhhh! you created a 4-eyed monster! (See your subjectline)

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    1. Re:No monsters in my subjectline... by MaxVlast · · Score: 1

      Eh?

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:No monsters in my subjectline... by Xaoswolf · · Score: 1
      ::-(

      I believe that is what is meant by the four eyed monster

      a joke mind you, not nesscessarily a good one, but a joke none the less.

  141. Wierd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THis is really wierd, as I was just thinking this exact question about a week ago (honest). Good works guys!

  142. Wait a sec, wait a sec... by eples · · Score: 1

    Surely someone eons ago with a typewriter had stumbled upon this sequence of characters.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
  143. Re: The First Smiley :-) by snevine · · Score: 1

    Well, I for one am glad to see that Microsoft is doing something useful with it's time!

    -snevine

  144. Re:How about the first use of "flame on"/"flame of by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    In those days it was always followed with "Flame Off", though this has sadly gone by the wayside

    Most likely because a lot of the flamers and trolls never actually stop.

  145. What about this emoticion? by mshiltonj · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    How do you convey "holding pinky finger to chin with one eyebrow raised, like Dr. Evil"? What's that emoticon?

    1. Re:What about this emoticion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's

      ':Q

      for ya?

  146. too much time by PegQuin · · Score: 1

    In the words of the late great Frank Zappa, "who gives a fuck anyway?"

    --
    PegQuin--I've got a sneakin' suspicion
  147. Re: Anonymous quote by Deven · · Score: 3, Funny

    /* Anonymity isn't all it's cracked up to be. */

    Who are you quoting? ;-)

    --

    Deven

    "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  148. DOS had a smiley in it.. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    C:

    'Course like all else DOS, it was backwards.

    1. Re:DOS had a smiley in it.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      is that the ancestor of Clippy?

  149. Mercury and candle in elevator by Engdy · · Score: 1
    Did anyone read the discussion in which the smiley was born? I'm wondering what the answer is to the originally posed question: "What happens to a drop of mercury and a lit candle in an elevator?"

    --
    Siggy Wiggy Figgy Tiggy a bana bo Biggy!
  150. The smiley by ShawnX · · Score: 1

    The only problem I have with the smiley is I /abuse it so much :-). The sad thing is when people meet me in RL, they think I'm always happy =)

    Oh well :-)

    --
    Everyone wants a Tux in their life.
  151. Back to original by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    If the :-) was claimed to be first used online in 1982, the PCs character set (and other home computers) predates that, so it is simply a case of going back to the original idea. I use the right way up (circle, two dots, smile, nose) glyph when I am hand-writing letters, rather than :-)

  152. Intellectual Property by lionchild · · Score: 2

    Just imagine, in our day and age of intellectual property, copyrights and trademarks...if Jim had only protected his copyright to that little emoticon... He'd be a wealthy man, now wouldn't he? :-)

    However, since he had the forethought not to do so, he has created something that has much a part of our daily lives as the air we breath and the cola we guzzle.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  153. Korean Smiley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all that is needed is to find the creator of the Korean Smiley, a.la:

    ^_^

  154. Ealier online smileys are known: MacKenzie, Apr79 by AlainRoy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It is well known that online smilies go farther back than the example provided here. The famous MSGGROUP (a very early mailing list, begun in June of 1975) had an earlier example of the smiley. On 12-April-1979, Keving MacKenzie wrote:
    Date: 12 APR 1979 1736-PST
    From: MACKENZIE at USC-ECL
    Subject: MSGGROUP#1015 METHICS and the Fast Draw(cont'd)
    To: ~drxal-hda at OFFICE-1
    cc: msggroup at MIT-MC, malasky at PARC-MAXC

    In regard to your message a few days ago concerning the loss
    of meaning in this medium:

    I am new here, and thus hesitate to comment, but I too have
    suffered from the lack of tone, gestures, facial expressions
    etc. May I suggest the beginning of a solution? Perhaps we could
    extend the set of punctuation we use, i.e:

    If I wish to indicate that a particular sentence is meant
    with tongue-in-cheek, I would write it so:

    "Of course you know I agree with all the current
    administration's policies -)."

    The "-)" indicates tongue-in-cheek.

    This idea is not mine, but stolen from a Reader's Digest article
    I read long ago on a completly different subject. I'm sure there
    are many other, better ways to improve our punctuation.

    Any comments?

    Kevin
    The MSGGROUP archives used to be easily browsable, I think. I found this mail message a couple of years ago. Today when I looked for it, I only found the compressed archives. You can find them online at: http://ftp.std.com/obi/Networking/archives/msggrou p/ The message in question is the file named "msggroup.1001-1100-z". I'm not the first person to note this. If you search for msggroup with Google, you'll find other people that have noted it. Even the Economist notes this earlier occurence. -alain
  155. :-( (R) - so pay up or else! by cliveholloway · · Score: 2
    Surprised to see no-one else posted this.

    .02

    cLive ;-)

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  156. I just want to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When did the first gay cum?

  157. Context by Yaruar · · Score: 2

    THe biggest problem is that a lot of homor and communication is visual. The wry smile at the end, the slight raising of an eyebrow can change the tone completely of a dialogue.

    A lot of people overuse smilies, but sometimes they are essential.

    My own sense of humor is exceptionally deadpan and serious at times and sometimes people look at me in horor until they see the wink just as I am walking away. Or a conspiratorial glance and twitch of the corner of the mouth at a friend.

    Like all text based communication (and to a certain extent telephone communication) there is a limit to how much can be conveyed withour prior knowedge of the individual involved.

    Humor is always subjective and often subtle.

    --
    Working for the (other) man
  158. Re: Anonymous quote by MCZapf · · Score: 1
    Ha! That's very good. Excellent use of a smiley too. I've had my sig for quite awhile and you're the first to make that observation about it.

    It's not really a quote, though. Note the lack of quotation marks. It's more of a comment, as indicated by the well-known C-style comment delimiters. It's also attributable to me, as I am logged-in and therefore not Anonymous.

  159. Yeah, but... by autopr0n · · Score: 3

    Assholes can still be funny. Just look at Dennis Leary or Lewis Black.

    A lot of times you'll rip into someone for the entertainment of others. You don't need a smiley for that.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assholes can definitely be funny. Just look at goatse.cx.

  160. What we need: an *honest* "LOL" by kisrael · · Score: 2

    I wish LOL wasn't so abused. Theoretically, it should mean "I am so amused, I actually made a noise" but I think it's been way watered-down, especially by people who use it to emphasize their own damn jokes, ala "You think you guys are gonna win the tourney? LOL!"...see, I don't think someone would actually laugh at that as they were writing. People use it to say "that's laughable" rather than "I'm actually laughing".

    "HAHAHA" and "Heh!" kind of work, sort of.

    Or a note like *audibly amused*.

    I used to use :-D , 'Course AIM et al have decide that's a big cheesy smile, not a laugh. Those pricks.

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  161. Smiley Over 80 Years Old People by kenp2002 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Umm I have seen hundreds of old typewrite pages that people did :) on that date to the 40s at least. In fact the >'))>> fish is at the bottom of a corrispondence that my client got in 1933! I would wager that the :) is at least as old as the first typewriters. Did everyone forget that before computers we had those old things? I feel old... think I'll go watch paint dry now while I soak my dentures....

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  162. Smileys were in use as early as early 1970s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Long before USENET there was PLATO. PLATO had emoticons galore, much richer than the ASCII ones that came later.

    On PLATO, one created emoticons by taking advantage of the SHIFT-space capability. Whenever you pressed SHIFT-space, the cursor moved back exactly one space. You could then type over the previous character. Combinations of certain characters led to all kinds of faces, smileys, beer glasses, you name it.

    To see some of these examples, go to www.platopeople.com/emoticons.html.

    - Brian Dear
    Working on a book on the history of PLATO

  163. First smily post, perhaps by geekoid · · Score: 2

    But in typing class in 1978, we would make all kinds 'pictures' using keys. Much to the frustration of our teacher.
    I can gaurentee you we weren't the first.

    OTOH qudos to the researcher that managed to dig this up.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  164. The real leap of faith by Albinoman · · Score: 1

    The real leap of faith has to be on that one fateful day when someone was getting searched at a border crossing and one of the guards thought to themself "I wonder if hes carrying anything in his butt".

  165. Aren't you glad he didn't patent this idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucking patent-abuse sucks.

  166. It's ironic that this is from Microsoft research by Red+Rocket · · Score: 1

    . . .considering that Microsoft has put an emoticon at the end of its latest OS . . .

    XP

    --
    - Hail to our fearless misleader! Fool speed ahead!
  167. Back when I was a kid... by UberQwerty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We had to walk to school through six feet of snow, year round, through the blistering heat, straight up, both ways, and we liked it.

    Bah.

    Just because it's possible to do things in a older, harder way, doesn't mean they should be done this way. To paraphrase, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," doesn't mean "If it works, don't improve it."

    Here's what's more or less a mathematical proof of why you'd be retarded not to use smilies:

    In information theory, information is defined as uncertainty. The more possible messages that can be received, the more information one of them carries. This means that if you are sending a stream of bits (ones and zeroes, like computers use), you'd have to send many, many bits to achieve the same level of information density as if you were sending roman charachters, of which there are 26. We humans typically communicate using words, of which we have thousands, which we represent with strings of 26 unique letters and some punctuation marks. The word "complimentary" carries much more information to its recipient than any one letter, say, "f", simply because there are too few letters for one of them to carry such a specialized meaning. As such, if we can take the formerly meaningless string :-) and assign it a meaning, if only in type, then we have contributed to the information density of every word we type. This is because not only does the person who reads a :-) know that we intend the preceeding statement to be a joke, but he or she can also deduce that based on our awareness and usage of this charachter, that we will not try to approximate it using other words. This means that if I were to use words one might otherwise use to approximate the meaning of a :-), the reciever of the message can know that I must have some reason for using the words instead of the :-). Therefor, to outlaw any potential meaning carrier needlessly cripples communication. If we can assume that each person's goal while using verbal communication is to clearly and quickly communicate a specific message, then it always serves this goal to incoorporate new meaningful symbols and thus more uncertainty (information), and it always works to the contrary to remove symbols.

    Think of '80s mallrat bimbos. They only had 3 words: "like", "y'know", and "whatever". Remember how many of these they had to string together to get meaning out of them? "Like, y'know, like, whatever, y'know?"

    Interestingly, the same argument can be used to show that it's retarded to outlaw words like fuck, shit, and ass. :-)

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  168. topical post from unix-haters by bap · · Score: 1

    Date: Fri, 14 Jan 1994 04:29:08 -0500
    Cc: unix-haters@mc.lcs.mit.edu
    Subject: Re: Re: Re- Stalin never had it so good...

    I think we can all agree that the odious typed smiley faces so beloved
    of the mass of ignorant unix nethead weenies, who never learned to
    express themselves in written form, and who therefore clutch at these
    pathetic glyphs as if by sprinkling a few grains of malodorous
    typographical powder upon a heavyhanded ignorant misspelled missive it
    will magically become imbued with lighthearted humor and wise witty
    sarcasm, have no place on unix-haters. :)

  169. First KNOWN smiley by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2

    Unless he has checked every possible source it is only the first known on-line smiley

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  170. hmm by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2
    Interesting methodology and a lot of work went into the search
    $ grep ':-)' /dev/rmt0
  171. Published in early '70s by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    I'm certain that I saw :-) explained in a "filler" at the end of an article in Reader's Digest before 1974. It was mentioned by whom the symbol was being used, but I don't remember that detail. It was explained as being a symbol for "tongue-in-cheek".

    1. Re:Published in early '70s by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Aha. Others said in 1982 and 1987 it was "twenty years ago" that Reader's Digest mentioned "-)" as meaning "tongue-in-cheek".
  172. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by spasm · · Score: 2

    .. and has anyone else been completely screwed by the htmlization of email leading to 'unrecognized tags' being dropped. so your tag at the end of an otherwise harsh-seeming sentence gets dropped, completely changing the meaning of the text.

    I've taken to using { brackets to be on the safe side - as in {sarcasm} {/sarcasm} when i don't know what email client the recipient is using. yuk.

  173. ROTFL by Captain_Stupendous · · Score: 1

    Was that meta? Or meta-meta? I think my brain just exploded...

    --


    I am alone, yet I also surf the universal backwash of undifferentiated Being, which is LOVE.
  174. Brought to you by Microsoft Research by murr · · Score: 1

    Your Windows/Office tax dollars at work.

  175. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by TheKey · · Score: 1

    I just use :: ::. As in, ::grins::, or ::rolls around::, or ::jumps:: .

    --
    My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  176. The other messages in the thread are funnier :-) by penguin_punk · · Score: 1

    such as:

    03-Oct-82 23:43 Guy Jacobson at CMU-780G Holding a chainsaw?? :-)
    Does anyone have a picture of R2D2 holding a seed auger in TeX format?
    Or how about a rendering of Yoda with a lathe for use with nroff?
    Any pointers to digitized images of short, cute aliens holding power
    tools would be greatly appreciated.

    --
    HURD - Hurd's Under Research & Development
  177. LOL! Pure Gold! by underpaidISPtech · · Score: 1


    this stuff is gold!

    ==========snip==========

    03-Oct-82 21:47 Wilson Harvey at CMU-IUS For anyone interested ...
    I have a picture of ET holding a chainsaw in .press file format. The file
    exists in /usr/wah/public/etchainsaw.press on the IUS.
    =

    03-Oct-82 23:43 Guy Jacobson at CMU-780G Holding a chainsaw?? :-)
    Does anyone have a picture of R2D2 holding a seed auger in TeX format?
    Or how about a rendering of Yoda with a lathe for use with nroff?
    Any pointers to digitized images of short, cute aliens holding power
    tools would be greatly appreciated.
    =

  178. Careful! That's a registered trademark of Despair by JofCoRe · · Score: 1

    Did you pay your licensing fees to use the frowny emoticon????

    You may or may not know it, but the frowny emoticon is a registered trademark of Despair, Inc!

    Be sure to license before use, to avoid any nasty lawsuits :)

    --

    Place sig here.
  179. Otoh... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    The phrasing: "All I want to know is who the man is that looked at a cow and said 'I think I drink from whatever comes out of those things when I squeeze them.'"

    Came from a Calvin and Hobbes strip.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  180. Smileys on PLATO in early 70's by rjwoodhead · · Score: 1

    Veterans of the PLATO system (you know, the place where networked notesfiles (usenet), irc, instant messaging and multiplayer games were invented 30 years ago) will remember animated emoticons being created in the early '70s.

    PLATO terminals had a 512x512 pixel screen, and one could create typeable strings that could backspace, super and subscript, and overprint (in AND or OR mode) characters. Numerous versions of smileys were created that actually looked like little smiling faces, and not sideways either.

    If anyone used :-) on PLATO, they would have been scolded for being uncreative.

    R

    --
    "World Domination - a fun, family activity"
    1. Re:Smileys on PLATO in early 70's by platopeople · · Score: 1

      Right. Here are the PLATO smileys and emoticons:

      www.platopeople.com/emoticons.html

    2. Re:Smileys on PLATO in early 70's by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      The second emoticon in the last group
      looks an awful lot like the Napster logo.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
  181. Well, how about by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    "HAHAHAHAHAHA, God damn man that's so fucking funny. LOL".

    If I find something funny online I usually will respond with "heh" or "hah" or "hahah" depending on the humor level. I'll only LOL if it's actually the truth.

    I used to think "LOL" was beneath me, but I ran into problems when I was actually laughing out loud and wanted to tell people that. I felt like a moron saying "I'm actually laughing out loud man."

    I would never type "ROTFL" unless, well, I was rolling on the floor laughing. Or had done so. Since that's never actualy happened in my whole life...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Well, how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despair Inc.: How are you gentlemen !!
      Despair Inc.: All your :-( are belong to us.
      Despair Inc.: You are on the way to litigation.
      CmdrTaco: What you say !!
      despair.com: You have no chance to win make your time.
      despair.com: HA HA HA HA ....
      CmdrTaco: Take off every ':-)' !!

      $ :-)
      Too many )'s.

  182. No! This is Wrong! "Kevin" create the first smiley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok guys!

    Go to
    http://ftp.std.com/obi/Networking/archives/msggrou p/

    Donwload the msggroup.1001-1100-z

    Rename to msggroup.1001-1100-z.gz

    gzip -d msggroup.1001-1100-z.gz

    vi msggroup.1001-1100-z

    e see the following:
    15-Apr-79 12:05:26-PST,1142;000000000000
    Mail-from: MIT-MC rcvd at 12-Apr-79 1740-PST
    Date: 12 APR 1979 1736-PST
    From: MACKENZIE at USC-ECL
    Subject: MSGGROUP#1015 METHICS and the Fast Draw(cont'd)
    To: ~drxal-hda at OFFICE-1
    cc: msggroup at MIT-MC, malasky at PARC-MAXC

    In regard to your message a few days ago concerning the loss
    of meaning in this medium:

    I am new here, and thus hesitate to comment, but I too have
    suffered from the lack of tone, gestures, facial expressions
    etc. May I suggest the beginning of a solution? Perhaps we could
    extend the set of punctuation we use, i.e:

    If I wish to indicate that a particular sentence is meant
    with tongue-in-cheek, I would write it so:

    "Of course you know I agree with all the current
    administration's policies -)."

    The "-)" indicates tongue-in-cheek.

    This idea is not mine, but stolen from a Reader's Digest article
    I read long ago on a completly different subject. I'm sure there
    are many other, better ways to improve our punctuation.

    Any comments?

    Kevin
    -------
    This is the really first smiley. -)

    And to know more about the MsgGroup see

    http://www.columbia.edu/~rh120/other/overhead_gov. txt
    Mahna Mahna

  183. Re:The lost BBS emoticon... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    .. and has anyone else been completely screwed by the htmlization of email leading to 'unrecognized tags' being dropped.

    It's their fault for using software that uses an HTML rendering engine to display email. :-P Then again, I've always used ":-)" and variants of it. I think I saw "<g>" only on GEnie...thought it ("<g>", that is) was ghey, so I didn't use it.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  184. Re:Ealier online smileys are known: MacKenzie, Apr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is "Kevin"? Anybody knows?

  185. It's a JOKE :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all those people who think :-) makes us lazy writters... look at how many people believed that :-( is trademarked... :-)... follow the link, it's a joke.

  186. "-)" for "tongue in cheek" dates from 1979 by Dennis+G.+Jerz · · Score: 1

    In 1979, someone named Kevin MacKenzie suggested the symbol -) for "tongue in cheek". It's not a "smiley", of course, but it serves the same function. I've archived the exchange that included the post: http://www.uwec.edu/jerzdg/English309/emoticon.txt

    --
    Literacy Weblog http://jerz.setonhill.edu/weblog
  187. Smileys are alot older than you think. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had smileys in the Bible. King James Version. :)

  188. AOL emoticons :-()===D by elmer-12 · · Score: 1

    I, like the inventor, hate AOL emoticons. They remove the extensibility of all the symbols they intercept.
    The Smiley thread gave me an idea I never thought of, though - the way to avoid some of the assymetrical symbols is to type them backwards (-:

  189. Has anyone else noticed the source? by QuadGoatBoy · · Score: 1
    (Research.microsoft.com)

    Does anyone else find this amusing? You know, that any of the Microsoft researchers would have time to research this while such a monstrous security audit was going on? :-)

    LOL

    Just messing with you, Mike.

  190. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is BS. The first smiley was probably on a typewriter, not a computer.

  191. Slashdot terms etc by phorm · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiousity, does anybody know who first used the abbrev /. or the term "slashdott'ed?" I'd guess that perhaps the site creators used /. but it would be interesting to know who first coined slashdotted, slashdot effect, and other slash-related terminology.

  192. undoubtedly the best emoticon ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emoticon for what emotion, I'm not exactly sure but its still cool:

    ~0

    jeje.

    Small Black Dog

  193. what you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! zerg! Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. all yer zerg are belong to us all yer zerg are belong to us (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 12, @10:15PM (#4249145) someone set up us the hyrdalisk! [ Reply to This | Parent ] Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted. all yer zerg are belong to us all yer zerg are belong to us (Score:0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 12, @10:15PM (#4249145) someone set up us the hyrdalisk! [ Reply to This | Parent ]

  194. Appears in Q speak by Felinoid · · Score: 1

    Smileys appear in the Quantium Link manual as part of Q speak.
    By that time no doupt smileys were already in commen use.
    By 1992 Quantum Link had shut down and the parent company would later be renamed America OnLine.

    A note for future arceologests. Recomendations of this sort are usually for long tested slang.
    It's often recomended that a person say jk or :) after a joke so this is hardly a unique request.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  195. Unicode lacks smileys :-/ by netpig · · Score: 1

    Seems that Redhat and others are moving to the UTF/Unicode which should solve lots of problems in char encoding.

    Unfortunately, there is only T H R E E smileys in unicode when people nowdays use tens of them in daily text. It looks like the unicode is going to be another version of ASCII - collection of junk what nobody uses. :-)

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero.
  196. Re: Who really did the first smiley? by code+fuhrer · · Score: 1

    CNN is running an article today about the first smiley, done by IBM Researcher, Scott Fahlman. They are saying it occured today (September 19th), not on the 10th.

  197. Last post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the last smiley of this discussion. :)