Slashdot Mirror


ECCp-109 Solved

Daerk writes "ECCp-109 has been solved. A week ago. Now wonder my stats haven't updated. Now what am I going to do till climateprediction.net goes live..."

290 comments

  1. This just in. by ellisDtrails · · Score: 0, Troll

    More useless science solved. Yipee.

  2. What will you do? by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    1. Re:What will you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I think I'll need to lose some weight before I get into contortion ;)

    2. Re:What will you do? by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

      or, make math history (and possibly win a couple of grand)

      find the 40th Mersenne Prime

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:What will you do? by Omnifarious · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I dropped SETI and started doing Folding because I think it will be more directly relevant sooner. It'd be neat to find signals from another civilization, but I'm more interested in learning the details of how the fanstically intricate machine that is a human being works so we can do a better job of fixing it.

    4. Re:What will you do? by nackrm · · Score: 4, Informative

      What about curing cancer? Try this.

      --

      Be a man! View at -1
      acm.cs.uwec.edu
    5. Re:What will you do? by Gubble · · Score: 1

      Sure, people just don't think about it enough. If someone prefers seti over cancer research, ask them "Would you rather die of cancer knowing that we are not all alone in the universe or would you rather live forever without knowing anything about our cosmic brothers?"

    6. Re:What will you do? by roybentley · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unable to resolve target system life.liberty.pursuit-of-happiness.

    7. Re:What will you do? by cwis42 · · Score: 3, Informative
    8. Re:What will you do? by remou · · Score: 2, Funny

      stop....doing...that...!!!!!!

      can't get my team and user stats since
      2 days, because of the increase in traffic
      and users!!!!

      neeed.. know... user/team... stats

      seriously though:
      good to see they are getting tons of new
      users lately

    9. Re:What will you do? by basilisk128 · · Score: 1

      All of my extra cycles go to the System Idle Process distributed computing project. It's going to take a lot of the work out of being lazy for all of us lazy people once it's finished.

    10. Re:What will you do? by jxs2151 · · Score: 1
      Unable to resolve target system life.liberty.pursuit-of-happiness.

      Must be a problem with that DNS thingie we read about recently.

    11. Re:What will you do? by 1.Nc3 · · Score: 1

      Their online calculator provides for a bit of fun. It accepts any valued entry for your computer speed and number of hours in a day...
      With a 98Ghz P4 on some distant planet with 285.6 hours in a day, I can crank out a test of 1 10 million digit Mersenne Prime every 24hrs!

      See you suckers at the bank!

    12. Re:What will you do? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Well, let me ask you:
      Would you rather die of cancer knowing that we are not alone in the universe, or would you rather die of cancer because you cannot afford the treatment that you helped develop?

      Mhmmm, that's a tough cookie!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  3. ars by tymellon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess what

    You guys here at /. got beat by Ars Technica. (in more ways than one)

    We ought to get the people here behind some distributed computing project. I bet we could beat any other team.

    1. Re:ars by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 4, Funny

      We ought to get the people here behind some distributed computing project. I bet we could beat any other team.

      And if we can't....well, we will show impressed we are by posting a link to their website hehehe....

    2. Re:ars by mjp9055 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or better yet, slashdot should start a feature dedicated to worthwhile distributed computing projects.

    3. Re:ars by Palos · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is one setup for United Devices, check out slashdot team.

    4. Re:ars by spakka · · Score: 1

      They kicked your ars

      (sorry)

    5. Re:ars by SigmundK · · Score: 0

      i just had an evil idea! if we make it so that to get to the sites that are linked to, you parasitically work on the seti project, it would be solved in a matter of days! muahahaha!

    6. Re:ars by TheReverend · · Score: 1

      Nobody stood a chance against Team Vodka Martini.

      --


      "Let me open these blinds so the snipers can see in." - Kevin Giffhorn
    7. Re:ars by Stoptional · · Score: 1

      LOL Yes, brings to mind the old "10,000 Monkeys with typewriters" fable.

      --
      Stoptional
    8. Re:ars by MadCow42 · · Score: 3, Funny
      >> We ought to get the people here behind some distributed computing project

      We have... it's called "DOS-a-server-randomly", and we solve that problem several times daily.

      q:]

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    9. Re:ars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /. has being doing distributed DoS attacks already. ;)

    10. Re:ars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys here at /. got beat by Ars Technica. (in more ways than one)

      We ought to get the people here behind some distributed computing project. I bet we could beat any other team.


      Ok, I have a 486 66Mhz with 8MB Ram(Old 30pin SIMM 1MB x 8) running Linux. Count me in!

    11. Re:ars by camusflage · · Score: 2

      Oh. You mean like UD's Team Slashdot?

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  4. What I'm gonna do by cordsie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now what am I going to do till climateprediction.net goes live...
    Figure out what the hell an ECCp-109 is?

    1. Re:What I'm gonna do by Infernus · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, no...he's gonna make a distributed application that tries to figure out what an ECCp-109...

    2. Re:What I'm gonna do by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I always find it useful when the headlines define the unusual terms they use. Or rather, I would find it useful if they did.

    3. Re:What I'm gonna do by misterhaan · · Score: 1

      the fact that it has cp-*number* makes me think it's a gun for the james bond / perfect dark games

      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

    4. Re:What I'm gonna do by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Now what am I going to do till climateprediction.net goes live...
      Figure out what the hell an ECCp-109 is?


      You'll probably have better luck reading the complete works of Shakespeare while waiting for your coffee to perk.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:What I'm gonna do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i modded the parent up because of his sig.

    6. Re:What I'm gonna do by cicatrix1 · · Score: 1

      And then you undid it when you commented (even as an AC).

      --

      I know more than you drink.
    7. Re:What I'm gonna do by Listen+Up · · Score: 1


      It is decrypting/find the breakability of elliptic curve cryptography (finding elliptic curve discrete log computatability). Go to http://www.nd.edu/~cmonico/eccp109/ and read all about it.

    8. Re:What I'm gonna do by satanami69 · · Score: 2

      I usually VNC into a home PC to mod from work and post AC.

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
  5. Watch TV? by kvn299 · · Score: 1, Funny

    or better yet, maybe take a walk?

    Na...

  6. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I can go to sleep.
    You don't know how much this has been keeping me up.
    None of you know.

    1. Re:Finally! by Xzzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      next week i'll be releasing a distributed computing screensaver for all major operating systems to try and figure it out, we're just putting some finishing touches on the code.

      we WILL know.

  7. This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The number of simultaneous distributed attempts against hard compute problems should be limited to 1.

    Having all these different crypto challenges, protien folding challenges, SETI searches etc, just dilutes the pool of available computers for each task.

    --
    I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    1. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by seanellis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having all these different crypto challenges, protien folding challenges, SETI searches etc, just dilutes the pool of available computers for each task

      Not necessarily. Each potential user is likely to be interested in only a few of these projects. I an runnning SETI, and if (when) that ends, I will probably go over to protein folding or the cancer drug search instead, as long as they have command-line clients. I'm not interested in crypto busting; it doesn't actually discover anything!

      The number of projects is optimal where the average number of projects of interest to each user is a bit above 1. That probably means one crypto, one SETI, one biology, etc.

    2. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Having all these different crypto challenges, protien folding challenges, SETI searches etc, just dilutes the pool of available computers for each task.

      That is only true if you believe that simply being 'unused' makes a pc available. I disagree with that, a pc is available when and if thee user says it is. Thus the user will say it is only if they have an interest.

    3. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Elitist+Snob · · Score: 1

      OK, but which one would you suggest we all do? Some of them seem more glamourous, or possibly just more interesting, than others, but if we were all trying to do our bit to help the most noble cause, then we'd all be running a cure-for-AIDS one. But lots of people find that too boring, and would rather check for extra-terrestrial intelligence.

    4. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's find a cure for islamic nutcases. Oh wait. Einstien already solved that one when he split the atom... good ol' Albert. Always thinking ahead.

    5. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, you're right. We should only run one at a time. Which one? RC-128 cracking? Go for it. Not interested. SETI@Home? Ok, but seeing as how I knew about it for years and never bothered downloading the client I suspect that would've continued for, oh say, eternity.

      The UD Cancer project is what finally got me into the distributed computing bit. Is it useful? Dunno. I hope so. But it's far more interesting to me than trying to brute force encryption (which is a known solution, and for which the time estimate can be accurately determined ahead of time), or search for signals in space (which, while I believe in extraterestial life and intelligence, I also believe in the laws of physics and seriously doubt the likelihood of any other race wasting the time and energy in broadcasting when listening is far easier, not to mention light speed constraints, diminuation and attenuation of signals on stellar scales, etc.), or finding prime numbers (useful for crypto, but current crypto is either way secure or hopelessly insecure based on quantum computing).

      My wife is running the UD agent on her computers now too. At some point I'll mention it to the rest of my family and they'll probably run it - curing cancer takes on a much higher priority after your father dies from it and your mother is diagnosed with it.

      I'm not going to try and force anyone run UD though. To each their own. Which, of course, is the little thing you seem to have forgotten here.

    6. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UD is awesome. I will continue to crunch for UD first, FightAidsAtHome second, Folding@home third, and Seti@home last.

    7. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

      I hate to me too post, but I laughed so hard people down the hall peeked in my door.
      thanks!

    8. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, UD seems to be windows only.

    9. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Drassk · · Score: 1

      I'm still amazed when I see this crap in a place that's I generally hope has the better half of society frequenting it. Nobody decided that Christianity had anything to do with being an asshole when, say, Hitler was doing it but now some guy crashes a plane into a building because the US is being an ass in his home country and it's a religious thing? The AC who posted this is an idiot, the people who modded it up are worse.

    10. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      Yeah... it's a definite drawback to the geek crowd, which is also the crowd most likely to run distributed computing projects.

      I dunno why either, since UD has some d.net developers working for them and some kind of technology cross-licensing going on. Go figure.

      I'll run Folding@Home on Unix boxes and UD on Windows boxes.

    11. Re:This is Dilution of Distributed Compute Power! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quit yer cryin you big baby. The acts of that religion are indefensible, even by losers like you.

  8. OGR 25 by garglblaster · · Score: 5, Informative

    check distributed.net for example!

    --

    perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

    1. Re:OGR 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OGR would be a viable alternative for many, except... DNet won't fix the OGR client! Right now, there is a known bug in the OGR client that incorrectly "trims" the OGR stub testing and creates invalid results.
      Some estimates are that we have actually tested the majority of the OGR stubs many, many multiple times (instead of the target 2 times for veracity's sake). And instead of working on the OGR client, DNet has publicly said that it takes a back seat to setting and running RC5-72!
      Fix the OGR client, and many people (myself included) would go back to running it, since the DNet client is probably the most hassle free to run on computers you don't physically touch on a regular basis (like my 82 year old grandmother's computer!)

    2. Re:OGR 25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ogr is borked! check their mail-list archive.

  9. Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Counter said 237,655 at 12:43 eastern time.
    Post your value and we'll measure the slashdot effect.

    1. Re:Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12:57 237,694 not exactly heavy activity, not even 3 hits per minute.

    2. Re:Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      239,472 at 1:18pm.
      1817 hits in 35 min = 52 hits/min.

      To the AC posting above this: note that the counter is reload proof, you have to remember the time when you *first* clicked the article, or reload from a new IP address.

    3. Re:Counter thread by dmanny · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you want a starting point before /. published the current link?

      --
      All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    4. Re:Counter thread by p0ppe · · Score: 1

      I think it was less than 200k about a week ago.

      --


      "Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner."
    5. Re:Counter thread by jelizondo · · Score: 1

      245,228 at 2:20 P.M. Eastern

      --
      Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
    6. Re:Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      251,505 at 2:59 EDT

    7. Re:Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      261,651 at 4:46pm

      23996 hits in 243 min = 99 hits/min? Wow, the story is the 4th on Slashdot's front page by now.

    8. Re:Counter thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      275,313 @ 6:01

  10. What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Lancer · · Score: 5, Informative
    Here you can donate your CPU cycles to help discover a cure for cancer. If that's not a noble cause, no telling what is.

    I will admit there's some irony in my being a member of the alt.smokers.pipes team for this though :)

    --
    Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
    1. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Puggles · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd *love* to switch from SETI to the cancer research program, but I'm definitely not switching to Windows to do it!

      *mumbles something about installing Windows would be spreading cancer*

      --

      Pereant, inquit, qui ante nos nostra dixerunt.
      "Confound those who have said our remarks before us."
    2. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So post in the UD Forums suggesting a Linux client. If enough Linux users do this, I'm sure they'll eventually seek to please them.

    3. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by garglblaster · · Score: 1
      So post in the UD Forums suggesting a Linux client. If enough Linux users do this, I'm sure they'll eventually seek to please them.

      that's a very valid point actually! If you have a look at the statistics here for example, you'll see that Linux is very likely to be operating system No 2 in the world today!!

      --

      perl -e 'printf("%x!\n",49153)'

    4. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Patersmith · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Who owns the results of UD projects, though? I'm not donating processor cycles so that some multinational can patent the cure for cancer.

    5. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by akruppa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd *love* to switch from SETI to the cancer research program, but I'm definitely not switching to Windows to do it!

      Not sure what OS you are using, but if it's Linux or MacOS, folding is a go for you. See the
      client download page. Studying protein folding is maybe not as directly aimed at curing diseases as Cure Cancer@Home, but odds are that if we understand folding better, a good antibody or two (or more efficient means of looking for them) will spring off.

      Alex

      --
      Heisenberg may have been here
    6. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here [ud.com] you can donate your CPU cycles to help discover a cure for cancer. If that's not a noble cause, no telling what is.

      Fine. I'll consider it, so long as any research benefitting from my donation signs a legally binding agreement not to patent the resulting cure (if any), or any other useful knowledged gleaned from our 'donations.'

      What, you say no way? Then this isn't a charity, it is just another profiteering company looking for a free handout, and playing people's heartstrings to get it.

      Most of the patented pharmaceuticals have significant contributions of public funds (taxes) as well as private donations (charities), which they then patent and sell back to the very people who helped underwrite their research at often unaffordable monopoly prices. AIDS is the perfect example of this, where treatments developed in no small part from publicly provided funds are patented and cost upwards of $20,000 year for each patient in the United States, while Brazil, which has chosen to ignore these very same patents, can offer the same treatment to AIDS patients down there for $200 / year (the government often picking up that tab and providing the medicine at no cost to the patient).

      Until the researchers involved stop patenting and locking down the knowledge they are gaining in no small part from our donations and our tax dollars, I'll keep my money, and my CPU cycles, thank you very much.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    7. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but I think he wanted to run UD. People should post in the UD forums about this and ask for a Linux client to be made. The more suggestions, the greater the chances are that a Linux client will be made available in the future.

    8. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How generous of you. Personally, if I can help find a cure for cancer, no matter if its PWNED by someone or not, I don't care. The end result would be a cure. Remember, some programs are made closed source, but somehow the source usually leaks. The same could be said for a cure. If Big Bubba Company Number 21987334786 has the money to back a project to search for a cure in order to profit from it, they may find the cure faster than by other people's nonprofit means. Point is, a cure could be found faster. Read again my closed source point above. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    9. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, many, many Linux/Unix users tried this. The UD officials said that the program that they use is written in Fortran, and that there is no decent Fortran compiler for Linux (that isn't in beta).

      --

      The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
    10. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      How generous of you. Personally, if I can help find a cure for cancer, no matter if its PWNED by someone or not, I don't care. The end result would be a cure.

      The end result will be a cure locked down by patents, sold at monopoly prices which only the wealthy or well insuread (two terms rapidly becoming synonymmous) can afford.

      I have no intention of donating anything to fund research designed to benefit the wealthy and not the rest of us. Better to have no cure, than to have a cure whose price has been so inflated that only the well off can afford it, and which by arbitrary government fiat has been artificially made unavailable to everyone else.

      Stop allowing patents on research funded by donations and public tax money and I'll reconsider, until then these sorts of charities are nothing more than just another corporate deception to take our money and use it to bolster their own profits.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    11. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could donate to the Protein Folding project. They have a linux client. It goal is to aid research to help understand diseases including Alzheimer's, Mad Cow (BSE), CJD, ALS, and Parkinson's disease

    12. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Many people have said this already - their response is that they can't - it'd need funding.

      Still, I'd love to see a Linux client.

    13. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      There is the intel one, AFAIK... As I said in my other post (posted when your repy wasn't here - you beat me to it) I thought it was funding which would be needed... or something.
      *ahem*

    14. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Thatmushroom · · Score: 1

      You may be interested in reading this little FAQ page. The most relevant question is the bottom question, which states that the IP is Oxford University's and National Foundation for Cancer Research's. Yes, they will release it to the scientific community.

      --
      You zap the moderators with a wand of humor! The moderators resist!
    15. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by sacrilicious · · Score: 2
      I'd *love* to switch from SETI to the cancer research program, but I'm definitely not switching to Windows to do it!

      Also, I'm not going to OK a EULA that looks boringly long and like it was designed to let lawyers hassle me. State it in plain English, in a single short paragraph.

      .

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
    16. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by nebenfun · · Score: 1

      >>I'd *love* to switch from SETI to the cancer >>research program, but I'm definitely not >>switching to Windows to do it!

      good thing we geeks have our priorities right!

      nbfn

    17. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Better to have no cure, than to have a cure whose price has been so inflated that only the well off can afford it

      My God man, did you really just say that?

      Your committment to your philosophy, and the resultant anger has really screwed your values up. Seek help!

    18. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      I'd *love* to switch from SETI to the cancer research program, but I'm definitely not switching to Windows to do it!

      There are Linux and MacOSX clients for Folding@Home, other Unices like Solaris, IRIX and AIX are coming as soon as they port them.

    19. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part 2 of the license agreement to install the client says that all information is confidential and the intellectual property of X Corp/group/gang.
      These ideas cannot be kept by a group, it's bad mojo for world.

    20. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people have said this already - their response is that they can't - it'd need funding

      So post away anyway. I'm sure there's plenty of people with piles of money reading the forums. If every interested Linux user posted, someone might take notice. If instead people shrug it off and say, "ah they've already answered, my post won't make a difference" then it might not be noticed by anyone who my want to contribute for this effort, but sees little demand and/or wasn't aware that there was such a demand.

    21. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The end result will be a cure locked down by patents, sold at monopoly prices which only the wealthy or well insuread (two terms rapidly becoming synonymmous) can afford.


      Congratulations, you missed my point entirely! A cure is a cure is a cure. Do you think it would really be kept secret? How long, if it was a protected secret, do you think it would remain secret? See again my example regarding closed source.

      I have no intention of donating anything to fund research designed to benefit the wealthy and not the rest of us.


      If it cures even ONE person suffering from cancer, then the time I spent crunching was worth it. I care about other humans, regardless of their income.

      Better to have no cure,


      Ever hear the story of the kid tossing starfish back into the ocean? Some onlooker questioned why he was doing that, after all, he couldn't save them all. Your reasoning is anti-human.

      than to have a cure whose price has been so inflated that only the well off can afford it, and which by arbitrary government fiat has been artificially made unavailable to everyone else.


      A cure for cancer, once discovered, no matter how protected it is, I'm sure someone will find a way to make it public to help those who possibly couldn't afford it otherwise.

      Stop allowing patents on research funded by donations and public tax money and I'll reconsider, until then these sorts of charities are nothing more than just another corporate deception to take our money and use it to bolster their own profits.

      Let us know when you've become ruler of your perfect society on your remote desert island, in your own perfect world. I'll be sure to send away for a brochure.

    22. Re:What are you going to do? Beat cancer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The end result will be a cure locked down by patents, sold at monopoly prices which only the wealthy or well insuread (two terms rapidly becoming synonymmous) can afford.


      Congratulations! You missed my point! Did you even read my response or did you just hit reply?

      Something as important to humanity as a cure for cancer, if discovered, could not stay hidden behind closed doors for long, only available to those who could afford it, etc.

      At any rate, if even ONE person is cured of cancer as a result of the UD project, then my crunch time was well worth it.

      I value human life, regardless of the individual's income levels.

  11. next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How about the DPAD/muon project?

    http://www.stephenbrooks.org/muon1

  12. Uh... What? by abhinavnath · · Score: 4, Funny

    *What* has been solved? EP-what?...

    NOOO!!!!
    Why have I never heard of this? I must be getting dumber!

    Now I'm sure all these uber-geeks are laughing at me.
    Must sit still. Must...find...something...cogent...to...say...

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
    1. Re:Uh... What? by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

      Must sit still. Must...find...something...cogent...to...say...

      That wasn't it.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  13. Why it took a week by 1155 · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the site, they haven't even confirmed if this is true or not..

    "The announcement is being made now, a week later because we had to wait for comfirmation from Certicom that this is the solution. (Which we still haven't gotten, by the way)."

    1. Re:Why it took a week by DmitriA · · Score: 2

      Probably because Certicom has more important things on their minds right now - like how to stay afloat with almost no money left in the bank

  14. Worthwhile distributed computing by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 2

    The more I see worthwhile DC projects out there like ECCp-109, Folding at home, and now ClimatePredition.net, the more I think I should participate in these rather than SETI@home (which I've been doing for 3+ year)

    Maybe it just comes down to what can aid humanity vs. what is simply a shot in the dark.

    --
    "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    1. Re:Worthwhile distributed computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree.

      I crunch a Seti@home WU once in a great while, but they have plenty of people crunching for them, so I may as well use my CPU for another project. I like UD and FightAidsAtHome.

      If I must crunch WUs for some space-related distributed project, why not one that scans the heavens for potential rogue rocks that may threaten earth? Why hasn't this been done yet? Not enough funding? Please... This would be a very worthwhile and probably never-ending project to help ensure the Earth isn't fragged by some asteroid.

      Until there's an asteroid hunter, I'll crunch for UD and FightAidsAtHome, lending some of my CPU power towards Folding and Seti once in a blue moon.

  15. Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cancer is one of the medical institutions major source of income, if it were cured, what would we do with all the stupid research centers? Many people think that cancer can be cured by using good food, lots of greens, no meat, etc. But really nobody considers this because it doesn't make money.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
    1. Re:Cancer? by protohiro1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a difference between cured and prevention. I don't think that the drug companies are conspiring to hide a cure for cancer to make more money. They would make a lot more money if they HAD a cure. That they could patent. And charge for.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:Cancer? by remou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the reason is even more fundamental.

      It's simply that nobody thinks in terms of
      prevention and roots/causes of illness,but
      only in terms of cures, symptoms relief...

      So all the money available is being
      channeled to cure research and none to
      cause/prevention research.
      (herbizides/pestizides/heavy metals/...
      nutrition and the like in the case of cancer)

    3. Re:Cancer? by eXtro · · Score: 1

      Many people think that cancer can be cured by using good food, lots of greens, no meat, etc. But really nobody considers this because it doesn't make money.

      Well, that and it doesn't work. Many people also believe that the world is flat, that the position of stars in the sky predicts future events and that Friday the 13th is a bad omen. Reality isn't a democratic process.
    4. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Cancer is one of the medical institutions major source of income, if it were cured, what would we do with all the stupid research centers? Many people think that cancer can be cured by using good food, lots of greens, no meat, etc. But really nobody considers this because it doesn't make money.

      Another datapoint. I used to date an Otolaryngologist (ears, nose, and throat) who worked at NIH (a (the?) main US national medical center).

      In normal conversation, she would talk about the large number of cancer patients she had and how hard it was for them to stop smoking or drinking alcohol even after they were diagnosed.

      One day, curious, I asked how many cancer patients she had over the years that didn't smoke, drink, or both. 30 seconds went by. A frown developed on her face. "I think, maybe, two over the past 10 years. One I know was the wife of a smoker." She went on to explain that most were both alcoholics and 1+ pack a day smokers, though nearly all the rest were either heavy smokers or drinkers.

      While cancer treatment and diagnosis wasn't her primary responsibility, it was a large part of the practice's business and (when money was available) research. Other problems they encountered were related to smoking -- especially cronic childhood ear/throat infections where one or both of the parents were heavy smokers.

      Take it for what it's worth. Me, I love going out with friends for a good beer or two (quality over quantity) and snacks. Her observations keep me out of the smokey bar area, though.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

      Yes, but there wouldn't be anything wrong with eating more healthily anyway. Thinking that Friday the 13th is a bad omen would cause you to mentally unstable, or scared. Thinking the world is flat, well that's just plain stupid.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    6. Re:Cancer? by eXtro · · Score: 1

      There is something wrong with your original suggestion though. You implied that eating right would cure cancer, so cancer research is a waste of time. Eating right might prevent some cancers, but doesn't cure cancer or prevent other types of cancer. Ignoring science and believing that eating your vegetables would cure your cancer could cause you to be dead, which is just plain stupid. Heck, doctors always tell people to eat right anyway. People just don't listen.

    7. Re:Cancer? by scotch · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, I think your nose and throat are really susceptible to cancer if you smoke. But plenty of people get prostrate or breast or bowel or brain cancer who don't smoke or drink.

      These things obviously decrease the risk, but I believe that you can't eliminate the risk of cancer via environmental factors entirely. Cancer is one of those "shit happens" things about life. Our bodies aren't perfect, cancer is really a product of this fact.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    8. Re:Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's just the thing though, I know of many people who have been cured by eating their vegetables, and they didn't die. Doctors may tell people to eat right, but often they don't themselves. In fact, the average lifetime for a doctor is 58, almost 20 years lower than the average person. Not only are they the most informed about healthcare, but doctors don't usually have the problem of not being able to pay for perscription drugs, like other seniors.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    9. Re:Cancer? by QuMa · · Score: 1

      Should have asked her how many patients drank water or breathed air...

    10. Re:Cancer? by enjo13 · · Score: 2

      My mother has very very serious advanced carcanoma .. she's extremely healthy, excercises, follows a nutrition plan, drinks very lightly (glass of wine with a meal kind of thing)....

      She's been this way for over 40 years, you tell me that cancer is only brought on by these things you mention.. and I'll tell you that I don't beleive you.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    11. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I was relaying her remarks only, for her specalty. Still, I'd hate to have my nose, vocal cords, or chunks of my lungs removed and still die when reducing risk to those areas is so easy -- as long as you're not addicted to smoking or drinking of course.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    12. Re:Cancer? by GigsVT · · Score: 2

      I know very few people who don't smoke or drink, or both. We are talking about a large chunk of the population there, well more than 50%.

      Ask her how many of her patients she knew over the years that never ate food. I bet she would have to think a lot harder. The clear conclusion is that food causes cancer!

      I'm not saying there isn't a correlation, or even possibly causation.. but it's very easy to slip in post hoc ergo prompter hoc type arguments with this stuff.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    13. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 1

      The comment I made was focused on a specific set of situations -- that was not claimed to apply in different situations -- and where there are exceptions. Take it for what it's worth.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    14. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 1

      As I've said elsewhere: 'The comment I made was focused on a specific set of situations -- that was not claimed to apply in different situations -- and where there are exceptions. Take it for what it's worth.'

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    15. Re:Cancer? by eXtro · · Score: 1

      I know of many people who have been cured by eating their vegetables

      Please back this statement up. Not that I don't trust you, but I don't trust you. Point me to a double-blind study where a group of women with say breast cancer fared as well statistically on a vegan diet as on a medically approved program or statistically better than untreated cancer.
    16. Re:Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

      No way... and there's a big difference between drinking sometimes, and being an alchoholic. Well more than 50%? maybe 50%, but definatly less than 80%. And we really know that it's cells that cause cancer :-)

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    17. Re:Cancer? by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      Yeah. So are car crashes, but if you regularly go 100 mph on heavy traffic, I won't be surprised when they scrape you off a concrete wall.
      My point being, you can get cancer through no fault of your own, BUT don't expect any sympathies when you develop throat cancer after 5 years of going through 2 packs a day.

    18. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 2
      You missed "She went on to explain that most were both alcoholics and 1+ pack a day smokers, though nearly all the rest were either heavy smokers or drinkers."

      Also, this is not a philosophical argument. It's not even a scientific statement of any riggor and was not asserted to be so.

      Read people, please. The complaints here are meaningless in context.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    19. Re:Cancer? by scotch · · Score: 2

      We're in violent agreement. My point was that elimination of nvironmental risks won't eliminate cancer. If you look at the start of the thread, you'll see that assertion.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    20. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 2
      No way... and there's a big difference between drinking sometimes, and being an alchoholic. Well more than 50%? maybe 50%, but definatly less than 80%.

      Thank you!

      And we really know that it's cells that cause cancer :-)

      But only on Tuesday -- hey, if cancer starts at some point, why not Tuesdays?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    21. Re:Cancer? by Rader · · Score: 2

      Yea, no kidding. It sounds like instead of expensive drugs, or Chemo, they could just take essence-o-broccoli

    22. Re:Cancer? by jgalun · · Score: 2

      The other reason nobody considers "good food, lots of greens, no meat, etc." as a cure for cancer is because it is not a cure for cancer!

      I see articles all the time about how eating this (broccoli, certain types of fish, etc.) or doing this (exercising, meditation, etc.) will cure, or at least lower significantly your chance of dying of cancer. And believe me, there are plenty of cancer patients and cancer clinics out there that are trying alternative methods, either for patients who don't trust drugs or who are already past help by standard treatments, whatever.

      But the fact is, none of them work. If I found out tomorrow that eating vegetables was all it took to not get cancer, I would become a vegetarian. But you know what? There are plenty of vegetarians out there who have cancer.

      Now, it is possible that various lifestyle choices can impact your odds of getting cancer/surviving cancer - that is very reasonable to believe. Of course, no one would be surrpised if people with balanced diets who exercised a lot survive cancer more often. But there is no simple cure for cancer like "just eat cabbage." To think that there is - and that it's just those evil public and private research institutions keeping such a cure private because they want to keep their jobs - is foolish paranoia.

    23. Re:Cancer? by jgalun · · Score: 2

      Cancer is one of those "shit happens" things about life. Our bodies aren't perfect, cancer is really a product of this fact.

      I am not a biologist, so I'm just wondering out loud here, but maybe someone can answer this for me:

      I presume that cancer is often just one of those "shit happens" things about life. That eventually your body will break down and do something it shouldn't do - like create a malignant tumor. But since we know that smoking leads to much higher incidences of cancer, do we know how much general environmental pollution leads to cancer? I read a couple years ago that certain cancer rates had increased in the US quite a lot during the past thirty years. Now, one possibility is that people aren't dying young of infections any more, so instead they're dying old of cancer. But another thought that crossed my mind is that simply this is what happens when a generation that has grown up with lots of smog, polluted rivers, etc., grows up. And that likewise, as we lower pollution, we'll see cancer rates decline again.

      Therefore, we would expect to see cancer rates increase in China and India soon, but decline in the Western world as it cleans itself up.

      Anyway, just wondering if someone can fill me in on how much scientists attribute cancer development to environmental pollution. Thanks!

    24. Re:Cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jeez, you got that Liberal Debate Style thing down cold don't ya?

      Take a statement like "smoking increases cancer risk in general" and turn it into "Well, my mom never smoked and she got cancer so you're just plain wrong"

      Where's the moderation for -1 fvcking idiot?

    25. Re:Cancer? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You think logical fallacies are only something that apply to philosophical arguments?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    26. Re:Cancer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear hear!

    27. Re:Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

      Well, these people are people I've heard of, I don't really know them personally. I did a search on google for Cancer Diet... some interesting stuff. "starchy diet linked to cancer
      Test in mice, linking diet, cancer
      "Most cancers can be prevented."

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    28. Re:Cancer? by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

      Prostrate cancer? Is that the kind of cancer you get when you lie down excessively? Interesting...

      --
      "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    29. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      Follow the thread. It looks like you are responding to the wrong person.

      If not, feel free to explain since I've read your comments a few times (quoted below) and can't figure out what you mean.

      1. Jeez, you got that Liberal Debate Style thing down cold don't ya?

        Take a statement like "smoking increases cancer risk in general" and turn it into "Well, my mom never smoked and she got cancer so you're just plain wrong"

        Where's the moderation for -1 fvcking idiot?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    30. Re:Cancer? by dscowboy · · Score: 1

      Ok, before we dive into anecdotal evidence and theories like "eating green food will protect you from cancer", let's check the facts.

      Cancer and heart disease are the biggest killers in the Western world. People die from them simply because most other common diseases are easily treated with modern medicine. Cancer and heart disease, however, are artifacts of the basic problems with the design of animal life.

      Here's how cancer works: Whenever a cell divides, there is a percentage chance that the genes of one of the 'child' cells will be distorted/mutated in such a way that the mechanisms that normally keep a cell from trying to divide as often as possible and take over the food supply are broken. This is understandable because a very large percentage of the history of our genome was spent in single-celled organisms, and it was important for cells to look out for themselves. In mutli-cellular organisms those genetic, cellular instincts from prehistory are not only unnecessary, they're deadly.

      Since there are tens of trillions of cells in your body, most of them dividing at a regular pace, the chances for one of them having this mutation is actually quite high. In fact, according to theory every animal experiences these mutations regularly. Every so many hours you are likely to have a newly divided cell start trying its best to create a tumor inside you. Fortunately for us each of our cells have suicide mechanisms that are instructed to switch on whenever cell division gets out of control. So most of these problem cells quietly kill themselves. Every now and then, however, a mutation turns these suicide mechanisms off, or the genome is simply too decayed to deal with the rogue cell effectively (the genome degrades during each cell division, which contirbutes to aging). Then a tumor forms.

      Given a long enough life-span, cancer WILL kill you. No amount of green vegetables are going to save you from cancer. The only thing that will prevent you from dying of cancer is dying of something else first. Without a 'cure', cancer is a statistical inevitability. Alcohol, smoking, asbestos, etc do not cause cancer; mutations during the division of cells causes cancer. Most 'cancer-causing' agents do nothing but create wear and tear on cells, causing them to age faster and increasing their chance of mutation.

      'Cure for Cancer' is a misnomer, we were all born with the propensity for cancer in our genes. The only true cure for it would be to 'fix' every cell in our bodies and remove the possibility they could go AWOL. What most researchers are looking for today is an effective treatment for cancer, that we can take whenever we grow a tumor.

      Finding an effective treatment for cancer would be the greatest benefit to human lifespan since antibiotics. And no, it doesn't just affect alcoholics and chain-smokers, it affects everyone and everything with animal genes in their body. 1.2 Million cases of cancer will be diagnosed in the US this year, 1500 people die of it each day in the US alone. 1 of every 4 deaths is from cancer. The only reason it isn't 4 out of 4 is because the other three die of something else first.

    31. Re:Cancer? by scotch · · Score: 1
      Shut your cake hole.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    32. Re:Cancer? by Spoing · · Score: 2
      1. You think logical fallacies are only something that apply to philosophical arguments?

      OK GigsVT -- you Pillar Of Logic and Exactitude -- let's break this down...shall we?

      I told a story that did not even hint at being the end all to beat all about cancer and the various causes or sources of cancer in it's many forms. To spell it out, it was an anecdote as can be seen in the choice of intentionally personal words used while telling it. If you disagree, pick any paragraph from my original post , and show how you were mislead into thinking this was promoted as something more exacting.

      In response to my original post, you wrote this;

      1. I know very few people who don't smoke or drink, or both. We are talking about a large chunk of the population there, well more than 50%.

        Ask her how many of her patients she knew over the years that never ate food. I bet she would have to think a lot harder. The clear conclusion is that food causes cancer!

        I'm not saying there isn't a correlation, or even possibly causation.. but it's very easy to slip in post hoc ergo prompter hoc type arguments with this stuff.

      ...and you accuse me of fallacies? Paragraph by paragraph, let's take a look at your stunning logic;

      1. Paragraph #1: The point of my first reply to this was that
      2. you restated my position but did not get it right . If you want to argue against something, read what it says first and stop inventing strawmen.

        Paragraph #2: Maybe food does cause cancer. Since this theory can't be tested, it is the fallacy of reduction to the absurd. Now, if you want to get really wacky, you can say something along the lines of "maybe oral ingestion causes cancer". Maybe it does. If it can't be tested -- and thus proved true or false -- there's no point in mentioning it except as a cheap debating technique.

        Paragraph #3: It's an anecdote. That's why it was posted using the style and form of an anecdote.

      Three paragraphs containing two fallacies (stawman & reduction to absurdity) and one bit of arrogance.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    33. Re:Cancer? by eXtro · · Score: 1

      Nobody disagreed that a diet can't help prevent cancer. Your premise was that cancer clinics weren't necessary because a (presumably) vegan diet cures cancer.

    34. Re:Cancer? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      My post was also intended to be anecdotal. Note the words "I know very few"... as in people I know personally.

      I never intended to imply you meant your argument to hold any scientific or logical merit. I only meant my message as a general warning against such arguments that people often do make, along the same lines as yours, but assert them as a valid argument. You took my message way too personally, it wasn't meant to be.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    35. Re:Cancer? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 2

      No, my premise wasn't really that severe, just stating that perhaps, donating your computer cycles may be better used somewhere else, contrary to the parent post. These research centers aren't terrible, and granted, some of them admit that a healthy diet is important. The problem is, many medical "cures" don't work either, i.e. you take pills, and you have to keep taking pills to stay "healthy". Then eventually they stop working, and you have to get more expensive pills.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    36. Re:Cancer? by karlm · · Score: 2

      Uhh.. second-hand smoke in bars and greasy food? I don't think alcohol is a known carcinogen. Are you referring to the strong corelation between tea-totaling and good diet?

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  16. The pool is not a fixed size by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The more projects there are, the more interest in the projects that there will be, and the larger the available pool of people willing to donate cycles.

    A little story to illustrate:

    There was once a lawyer in a town. That lawyer didn't have any business, and he nearly starved to death. Then one day, another lawyer moved to town and there was more than enough business for both of them.

    --
    Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    1. Re:The pool is not a fixed size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There was once a lawyer in a town. That lawyer didn't have any business, and he nearly starved to death. Then one day, another lawyer moved to town and there was more than enough business for both of them.

      that's not exactly the same case here, unless you're saying that we'll soon bruteforce each others.

    2. Re:The pool is not a fixed size by SillySlashdotName · · Score: 1

      There was once a lawyer in a town. That lawyer didn't have any business, and he nearly starved to death. Then one day, another lawyer moved to town and there was more than enough business for both of them.

      Or the villige idiot who, being pitied by the townspeople, was hired to polish the cannon in the square. He saved all his money, bought his own cannon, and went into business for himself!!

      Sorry, talking about lawyers brought idiots to mind...

      --
      Acts of massive stupidity are almost never covered by warranty. --me.
    3. Re:The pool is not a fixed size by Alsee · · Score: 2

      There was once a lawyer in a town. That lawyer didn't have any business, and he nearly starved to death. Then one day, another lawyer moved to town and there was more than enough business for both of them.

      And all was well and good in the town for nearly six years. Then a third lawyer moved to town and that was the beginning of the end, for soon there were more more lawyers in town than non-lawyers. God saw what had become of the city and wept. And weeping lead to dispair, and dispair lead to anger. In his anger god destroyed the city in a rain of fire. But in his anger god grew careless, for his rain of fire accidentally destroyed the neighboring city of Sodom.

      And so goes the story of the sin of Gomorrahry.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  17. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Nintendork · · Score: 2

    I agree. This news is something that should be in a very specific ezine. Might as well start posting prices of Pokemon cards.

  18. Here's a real math mystery by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can anyone here prove the theory first suggested by Beavis that "the angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the beat"?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Here's a real math mystery by Thumpnugget · · Score: 1

      the theory first suggested by Beavis that "the angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the beat"?

      Um, first off, that's directly proportional. And this hypothesis was first proposed by Funkadelic in "Jimmy's Got A Little Bit Of Bitch In Him" from the classic album Standing On The Verge Of Getting It On. Not by Beavis.

      Jeezus - doesn't anybody study the classics anymore??

      --
      Free yourself. Everything else will follow.
  19. or join the God existence proof seekers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No client to download. Just write "God, if you can see this, please show yourself!" in a large font on your screen using the blink-tag. If enough people do it, God will see it.

    Note that once we make contact with God, He can cure cancer for us, factor larger integers, or tell us where the aliens are, so this distributed computing project subsumes every other one.

    1. Re:or join the God existence proof seekers by 16384 · · Score: 1


      Why don't you ask God instead?

    2. Re:or join the God existence proof seekers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, he wasn't answering his phone.

    3. Re:or join the God existence proof seekers by Mendax+Veritas · · Score: 1
      Just write "God, if you can see this, please show yourself!" in a large font on your screen using the blink-tag.
      No, no, no. Write it on your screen with a thick Magic Marker.
    4. Re:or join the God existence proof seekers by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      And then hopefully He will smite all those people for using the blink tag :)

  20. If anyone's interested by ksplatter · · Score: 5, Funny

    they can join my distributed project. Just download my program and it runs in the backround. It will be busy computing the number of Distributed Projects in the world. We currently have 30,000 users. We expect to know the exact number in 100 years.

    FAQ:
    Why will it take so long to figure out:
    Short Answer: The number of Distributed Projects out there grows exponentially.

    Why would anyone want to do this:
    Short Answer: Nobody does

  21. As Homer would say... by triaxcaribdis · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...mmmmmm curvey...

  22. Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I've noticed (along with many others) that the spelling and grammar in Slashdot articles has been very bad lately. This is not something that can be solved by a simple spell checker: "Now" is just as much a word as "No."

    However, spell checkers are not even used! Look at the previous article where the word "Saftey" is used--this is not a real word, and no spell checker would let this slip by.

    How long would it take to edit an article before posting it? Check for spelling errors as well as misplaced, missing, or mistaken commas (the past several articles include several examples of comma abuse.)

    Why bother fixing Slashdot grammar and spelling? Several reasons: Slashdot would become easier to read, would become less open to misinterpretations due to poor grammar, and would gain credibility.

    As I conclude this posting, I have noticed that the last bulleted item under the "Important Stuff" section on the comment submission page spells "logging in" incorrectly.

    To solve this problem, I suggest we put our very own Jon Katz to work editing posts to correct for spelling and grammar errors.

    Go ahead, mod me down as offtopic. However, the problem still remains.

    1. Re:Spelling by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you would have done better with a goatse link.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    2. Re:Spelling by Farmer+Jimbo · · Score: 1

      I appalled! Lets set up a distributed computing project to track down all spelling errors on /. as they happen. What's more worthy than that?

    3. Re:Spelling by vasqzr · · Score: 1


      Want bad spelling?

      Try hanging out on IRC for a day....

      Most people don't realize that when they make blatant spelling and grammar errors, they look like fools.

    4. Re:Spelling by wrax · · Score: 0

      simple solution, get more arts people to join slashdot. its a proven fact that arts people spell correctly more often than science or math people ...i won't even go into the spelling habits of computer techs.

    5. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I deliberately shorten or abbreviate some words in IM conversations. I also usually ignore typos, as long as the words are still understandable. The other party does the same. It's not like you or anyone who cares is watching.

      I hope. :-)

    6. Re:Spelling by triumphDriver · · Score: 1

      I never let good grammer or spelling get in the way of misunderstanding.

      --
      I grew up in the Fulda Gap, where did you?
    7. Re:Spelling by Malc · · Score: 1

      Recently? Where've you been? It's always been bad. Look at my UID, you can see I'm talking from experience.

  23. Attack an algorithm that matters! by jlcooke · · Score: 3, Informative

    An MD5 attack can be accomplished in O(2^64) or roughtly 2.5 d.net years.

    RC5-64 was a O(2^63).

    ECC-109 was a O(2^54).

    JLC

    1. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O(2^64) = O(2^63) = O(2^54) = O(1). You did not want to use big-oh notation.

    2. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is that standard O-notation or something different? O(2^64) = O(k) = kO(1) = constant time, which would be kind of strange for encryption. 2^64 instruction cycles (or whatever) wouldn't be all that heavy on typical hardware. Regular O-notation would be O(2^n), where n=64, 63, and 54, respectively.

    3. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Might want to spell your own URL correctly :-)

      http://www.certainkey.com/dnet/

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Suppose you had 2^64 simple floating point operations to complete. A super-cluster capable of 35000 GFLOPS would take ~6 days to finish this task. This would definitely be heavy on typical hardware.

    5. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      Breaking a 64-bit key does take O(2^64) time. Big-O notation expresses the performance of the algorithm on a wide range of inputs; all 64-bit keys are 64 bits and can be cracked in (on average) the same amount of time.

    6. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by karlm · · Score: 2
      Birthday attacks are relatively fast, but very memory and bandwidth intensive. In order to find a collision with a work factor of 2**64, you end up computing, sorting, and storing 2**64 md5 sums... which will take 2**68 bytes of storage plus indexing overhead. And in order to facilitate rapid insertions and searches for solutions, you want many times this storage space available.

      Plus, a few FPGAs on a PCI card may be able to saturate the PCI bus with results more efficiently than an ethernet card in the same PCI slot.

      With RC5-64, nodes only needed to send back ("they key wasn't in the huse block of keys you told me to try"). Cracking md5 with a work factor of 2**64 means sending back each and every result to the server... that's a lot of bandwidth.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
    7. Re:Attack an algorithm that matters! by jlcooke · · Score: 1

      Not true!

      van Oorschott and Weiner used a cycle finding algorithm which reduced the memory and bandwidth requirment 2**32 fold.

      Briefly decribed here:
      http://www.certankey.com/dnet/

  24. Boring!!! by ksplatter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wake me Up when the figure out ECCp-110. That'll really be something!!!!

  25. Do the next one by L.+VeGas · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now you can start on ECCp-110

    1. Re:Do the next one by DmitriA · · Score: 2

      Even characteristic curves are generally not used for cryptographic purposes anymore as there are some fairly advanced attacks against them

  26. Yes, but is Certicom going to pay the reward? by DmitriA · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hear that they are in huge financial trouble and barely have enough money in the bank to last them a couple of months. The last thing they probably want to waste it on is paying for this

  27. when I was little by shren · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When I was little, I loved to write computer programs that would count. They'd start at one and count upward, and I'd keep track of when it gained decimil places.

    Pointless, right? Well, does this cryptography cracking have a point? We know that the algorithm will be cracked when the right key is hit. It's just as much electrowanking as jumping up and down when your
    computer counts to a million, with a bit of cryptography politics thrown in.

    I don't get why people are drwan to these projects over more significant problems like OGM or protein folding.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    1. Re:when I was little by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't get why people are drwan to these projects over more significant problems like OGM or protein folding."

      Maybe they're anti-human? Can relate better to machines than fellow humans? Have more in common with CPUs than humanity? Dream of being a borg?

      I don't understand it either.

    2. Re:when I was little by eXtro · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Cryptographic cracking has a point though, we rely on cryptography for personal security. We need to be able to establish guidelines for what may be considered secure enough for a given application. In order for this to happen these algorithms have to be tested. Cryptographers do the bulk of the real work by analyzing the underlying algorithms and publishing new, faster faster methods to brute force these algorithms. We do our part by applying these algorithms and proving that a given algorithm is in fact weak for a given purpose.


      This is necessary, the government would otherwise do a real world repeat of the apocryphal Bill Gates statement "640K ought to be good enough for anyone" and restrict the upper limits of cryptography that may be used. This is fine until the wrong people take advantage of this and sieze information damaging to us.


      Whether there's more point to cancer research is a personal consideration. Insisting that spending time on seti v.s. cracking cryptography v.s. curing cancer is like complaining that somebody went into computer science rather than bio-medical where they could have cured cancer rather than started the next dot-com.

    3. Re:when I was little by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, does this cryptography cracking have a point? We know that the algorithm will be cracked when the right key is hit.

      I think that the point is that a lot of PHBs and policymakers won't believe that a given encryption technology will ever be crackable until they see that it actually has been cracked. There are a lot of people in this world who refuse to believe that anything that is still "theoretical" is either possible or important.

    4. Re:when I was little by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't get why people are drwan to these projects

      Because they say it can't be done. Breaking encryption was touted as impossible ten years ago. "It'll take the fastest computer in the world a kajillion years to break 56 bit encryption" It actually took quite a bit less. 64 bit encryption took less than 5 years to be broken.

      Distributed.net may be partially responsible for relaxing the laws on exporting encryption. Perhaps it'll take a billion years to break 8192bit encryption with todays technology, but give it 5 years, and newer computers will be able to break it in minutes.

      Why not protien folding or cures for cancer? Some because there is no Linux client. Some because the result may not be made public domain. Some I do.

      I have 6 machines running at home, some are running dnet, some are Seti. Some have one project running on one processor, and another project running on the other processor. But more than 50% of my cycles go to Dnet.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    5. Re:when I was little by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      We're not applying algorithms and proving that a given encryption is secure against those attacks though.

      d.net is brute forcing them - which is a tactic known to be possible against every form of encryption. It basically boils down to figuring out how many keys you can try per second and assuming the worst case - that the very last key in the set will be the correct one (if you want average times then you can just assume that with enough messages you'll average out to finding the key half way through).

      It's really pretty simple math, and anyone who wants to claim that "x-bit encryption is clearly enough!" is just going to be proven wrong when computers scale up to the point that your wristwatch can do y computations of x bits in a second.

      I contend, rather, that current encryption schemes are secure as long as you use enough bits, where "enough" keeps growing. Of course if quantum computers ever really work then you can throw all the old school crypto methods out the window anyway.

      As someone else said, there are PHB's and other idiots that don't grasp theoretical realities though, and for them it actually has to have been broken to be proven susceptible.

      complaining that somebody went into computer science rather than bio-medical

      Well... not quite. I'm much better at computers and programming than I am at biology, chemistry, and life sciences. Computers aren't like that though - one set of bits is just like another to them. That said, some computers do certain things far better than others, so it may be that a PPC runs RC-128 cracks way faster than it can fold proteins, but that's quibbling.

      I very much agree that running distributed projects at all, or which one to run, is an individual choice. I prefer UD Cancer. Others prefer the mathematical challanges. Whatever floats your boat - osteniabbly either one is better than spinning the CPU cycles into oblivion (to which some will disagree of course!).

    6. Re:when I was little by kingkade · · Score: 1

      Distributed.net may be partially responsible for relaxing the laws on exporting encryption. Perhaps it'll take a billion years to break 8192bit encryption with todays technology, but give it 5 years, and newer computers will be able to break it in minutes.

      One can use the same reasoning to conclude that in 5 years those same computer that will be much more powerful will enable us to create even larger/more complex keys (that will presumably take another five years to break).

      It almost seems as though any sufficiently large key can at least be made to be temporarily safe, so this would mean that one should key a new key every couple of years, but old information will be vulnerable if it is still important (bank accnt number).

      I don't know where the so-called 'quantum' computing fits into all of this.

    7. Re:when I was little by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Some because there is no Linux client.

      Wrong.

      Weaselmancer

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    8. Re:when I was little by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      I think the parent was referring to the UD project

    9. Re:when I was little by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Why not protien folding or cures for cancer? Some because there is no Linux client.

      Click here.

    10. Re:when I was little by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      But will the results be public domain?

      []Yes
      []No
      Prove it______________________

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    11. Re:when I was little by sql*kitten · · Score: 2
      But will the results be public domain?

      See here.

      Folding@home is run by an academic institution (specifically the Pande Group, at Stanford University's Chemistry Department), which is a non-profit institution dedicated to science research and education. We will not sell the data or make any money off of it. ...

      the raw data of the folding runs will be available for everyone, including other researchers, here on this web site
    12. Re:when I was little by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I stand corrected. I might just donate some cycles to it then. I had heard one of those cure-for-cancer things was run by a drug company. I must find out which one, so I don't waste my resources on them.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  28. A suggestion by Greedo · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a distributed project where millions of people around the world can correct spelling mistakes in Slashdot articles. Or cancel previously posted stories.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:A suggestion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or mod down redundant posts!

    2. Re:A suggestion by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      How about a distributed project where millions of people around the world can correct spelling mistakes in Slashdot articles. Or cancel previously posted stories.

      Because even if they figured out a way to port the application to every PC, Mac, superconputer, cell phone, PDA, refrigerator (et addendum)... They still would not get enough processing power to do it within any of our lifetimes.

  29. Re:It's been asked before, but... by jeblucas · · Score: 4, Funny
    At least make it something at least a little interesting, like my proof that 1 + 1 = 3.
    Here's my proof:

    a = a
    a^2 = a^2
    a^2 - a^2 = a^2 - a^2
    Factor both sides, one by binomial, the other by a
    (a + a)(a - a) = a(a - a)
    Divide by the common (a - a) factor...
    (a + a) = a
    2a = a
    2 = 1

    Therefore 1 + 1 = 2 + 1 = 3.
    QED

    --
    blarg.
  30. ...and where would this project happen to be? by AltGrendel · · Score: 1

    A link would help.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  31. Journalism at its best! by Stonehead · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sigh. Insert obligatory sulky comment about tired Slashdot editors who were again too lazy to do any homework and include a description or background on ECCp-109. Instead, "What is it!?" screaming readers all over the place. Well, thanks. You want that Slashdot effect to happen to them, don't you?

    1. Re:Journalism at its best! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      How is this off topic? I totally agree here...

      When I read the Slashdot posting I thought - how lame. The least they could do to add to this one sentance story is to add another sentance giving a description of what the hell it was talking about.

      I think it was most likely not added to make people feel that they are not 1337 enough if they dont know what it is by default. Whatever.

  32. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah Yeah... and (a-a)=0....
    hmm Common division by zero : O )

    Not a very complicated .. hmm ..
    But think about this one
    Girls = Evil ...

    Girls= Time*Money
    Time is Money (Girls=Moneys^2)
    and Money is the Root of all Evil
    Girls = Evil

    Simple : O )

  33. Re:It's been asked before, but... by rreyelts · · Score: 1

    Didn't they teach this in grade school?

    Your proof is wrong because you're dividing by zero - disguised as (a - a).

  34. Let's try this instead by laigle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So now we know distributed efforts can solve great big math problems. Don't get me wrong, that's good to know and all, but.. aren't there any math problems that would be of more use than giving people with 210 IQs something else to bicker over during Star Trek conventions? Really, I'm an engineer, and sometimes I actually have to use math to do things like MAKE A FRIGGIN CAR OR SOMETHING.

    There are plenty of nontrivial engineering problems out there, especially when you take a trip into thermodynamics and fluid flow. Let's solve those. Or sequence the human genome to grow an extra arm or something. Or better yet, let's put the computing power of mankind to work to randomly generate a script for Episode 3 that won't make us want to beat Lucas senseless with our plastic lightsabers. Why can people scrape together all these prizes for pointless pseudo-intellectual drivel but nobody can get some money behind something worthwhile, or at least interesting?

    Here's an idea: Instead of using distributed computing for all this junk science, let's start a central distributed network. This network would have a basic interface element for all the major OS configurations, and would be able to update from the web with whatever mathematic formula and trial space it was supposed to run at a given time. Everyone everywhere could download the client, and set it up to run with whatever processor load they wanted, update on a schedule, maybe vary processor load on a schedule so it works extra hard when you're not using the system. Not much of an interface really. Then some organization, say the NSF or better yet an international science conglomerate, could alot portions of the system load to projects they deemed worthy, depending on complexity and value. The cost is basically nothing, in fact since you could get somebody on the planet to write the code for free one weekend, and the bandwidth would likely be rather low, you would most likely not be talking about the cost of funding a minor research project. Users could still run other distributed clients if they wanted, and the system would be completely voluntary. But it would attract a lot of attention and users, do some good for mankind, and direct our computing power in positive directions.

    1. Re:Let's try this instead by redbaron7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, it is called "Grid Computing". A number of software magazines and journals have featured articles on it in recent months. I think even Scientific American had an article on it 6 months or so ago.

      The scheduling/etc problems for a Grid are pretty big, so the first Grids will have nodes based in academia and each node will be pretty powerful (eg. a small cluster).

      If such a scheme works and as the technology matures, maybe we'll see Grid nodes on home computers.

      RB

    2. Re:Let's try this instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude that's the best idea ever... dreamers and idealists understand this philosophy. imagine

    3. Re:Let's try this instead by laigle · · Score: 1

      Sure, but that's grid computing. I'm just talking about using basic distributed computing programs like the SETI search screensaver to solve straightforward but computationally expensive problems. Sure, it won't let somebody do a real time FEA for heat stress on the Space Station, but for anything that can be broken down into non-interdependant units or which simply requires a large number of trials it would be great. The only real difference between my system and what they're already doing would be that mine would have the actual math as a seperate object, and would have to include a bit more functionality for web updates.

      I do imagine that someone is going to discover a way to crossbreed standard distributed computing and P2P networks to generate a workable pseudo-grid at some point though. After all, the reason distributed is so easy and grids are so hard is mostly the scheduling and control, as you pointed out. By inserting propagation and communication into the system you could get better results, more akin to grid computing, but without the need for one central brain managing the whole process. Mostly it's a matter of search algorithm though, and that's problem dependant.

    4. Re:Let's try this instead by Jhan · · Score: 2

      While I agree that we do need an open, portable distributed computing platform for these kinds of efforts, I think you have underestimated the need for communication between nodes in some kinds of calculations.

      You mention fluid dynamics. These programs require data to be exchanged between nodes and their neighbors every iteration. That won't ever work when the two nodes in question are connected by 14.4 modems and down 80% of the time.

      Massively distributed PC-based efforts can only work if the problem can be partitioned into parts that do not rely on any data on any other node.

      Very few real life computing tasks fulfill that condition.

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    5. Re:Let's try this instead by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:Let's try this instead by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 1

      >There are plenty of nontrivial engineering problems out there, especially when you take a trip into thermodynamics and fluid flow.
      >Let's solve those. Or sequence the human genome to grow an extra arm or something.

      Fluid flow ... Growing a third arm? laigle, getting a little tired of spelling mistakes from one-handed typing aren't we ;-)

    7. Re:Let's try this instead by redbaron7 · · Score: 1
      Well there's COSM (used by Folding@Home) and United Devices (THINK,etc).

      Still centralised systems, but they work for different projects - unlike d.net & SETI@Home which are 'hard-wired' for particular projects.

      There's lots of work going into this kind of stuff. As the current systems are considerably more advanced compared to the d.net circa 1997 system (when I first started to run a client), I'm sure another 5 years will see huge improvements in usability & flexibility.

      RB

    8. Re:Let's try this instead by pointwood · · Score: 2

      You forgot The Distributed Folding Project. No, it's not the same as F@H ;)

    9. Re:Let's try this instead by pointwood · · Score: 2

      Dang! Of course I just realises that you in fact didn't forget it - instead, I must need new glasses :)

      Sorry about that :(

  35. Re:It's been asked before, but... by kwan3217 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bad math! BAD! You divided by zero! no donut for you.

    (a-a)=0 for all values of a

    --
    Lots of technical and environmental problems are solved by the application of vast amounts of nuclear power
  36. Re:It's been asked before, but... by LudditeMind · · Score: 1

    Bzzzt.. Can't divide by zero. a - a = 0

  37. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generally, people do this "proof" using a 'b' also to make the divide-by-zero less obvious.

  38. Re:Correct quote... or so I am told... by stephenisu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "the angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the meat"
    Says my fellow go-worker in the neighboring cube...

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  39. !SPOILER WARNING! by t0qer · · Score: 5, Funny

    The answer is.

    k=281183840311601949668207954530684

    Great movie, really hard to understand ending.

    1. Re:!SPOILER WARNING! by Leigh13 · · Score: 1
      From the site:
      A brief reminder: The challenge consisted of two points, P and Q in the same simple-subgroup of a particular elliptic curve group. This is the value of k such that Q = kP.

      Well, if Q = kP, then k = Q/P. Sheesh, it took almost two years to solve that?

      I guess they wanted to be especially careful to mind their P's and Q's.

      --

      What I should have said was nothing.
    2. Re:!SPOILER WARNING! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone should know that the Answer is 42!

  40. climateprediction.net by hayduke.com · · Score: 1

    from climateprediction.net... * Operating System: Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows ME, Windows 2000 Professional, or Windows NT 4.0 Uh, doesn't this leave most of the /. crowd out?

    1. Re:climateprediction.net by anonymous+coword · · Score: 1

      nah, they would just use wine.

  41. Damn, I thought I'd be marked down as a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I'd have known it's get that sort of score, I'd have signed my name to it.

    1. Re:Damn, I thought I'd be marked down as a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't worry - you're still a trollturd

    2. Re:Damn, I thought I'd be marked down as a troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because the same damn thing was posted to the article on the Poincare conjecture?

  42. YOU FOOL! by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you realize that once we contact the aliens they can cure all earth diseases with a flick of a tentacle?

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:YOU FOOL! by jakobk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but would they want to?

    2. Re:YOU FOOL! by Omnifarious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Except, then they'll also start consuming us for food. That's another often overlooked disadvantage of SETI.

    3. Re:YOU FOOL! by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or maybe they'll die of a common human cold, saving us from the brink of destruction at their cruel martian hands.

      Time will tell.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    4. Re:YOU FOOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...cruel martian hands.
      egad! i truly hope the seti folks aren't assuming that the transmission will come from mars...you don't need a whole lot of processing power to point a dish at mars and loop over a while(!signal).

    5. Re:YOU FOOL! by Asprin · · Score: 4, Funny


      Except, then they'll also start consuming us for food. That's another often overlooked disadvantage of SETI.


      +1 ***INFORMATIVE***?!?!?!

      WTF?!?!?!

      +1 Funny, sure. +1 Interesting, maybe. Hell, I'll even buy +1 Insightful when I'm on Nyquil, but +1 INFORMATIVE?!?! Who's moderating today -- Art Bell?

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    6. Re:YOU FOOL! by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ever consider that maybe he knows something you don't? Hmm?

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    7. Re:YOU FOOL! by rlalan · · Score: 1

      but we can use an apple laptop to upload virus to their system and that will fix that. ala id4.

    8. Re:YOU FOOL! by Idarubicin · · Score: 2

      There's a rich irony that the parent to this post is now also marked Score: 3, Insightful.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  43. Wow... by delta407 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    To everyone who particpated: Thank you for helping, and not letting those CPU cycles go to waste. Projects and challenges like these are very important to really, really know what the state of the art is in computation.
    Frankly, I don't see how brute-forcing an elliptic curve encryption algorithm is productive in any way. We know it can be broken by scanning the keyspace, and we don't need trillions of CPU cycles to prove it. So, practice has proven mathematics right again. The result was known beforehand, so how does this help anyone?

    Oh, and want to see what is "state of the art computation"? See here.
  44. Is it just me ... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... or does anyone else picture some guy at the distributed computing sorta places going, "Their cycles ... all their cycles ... ARE MINE ... ALL MINE! BWHAHAHAH!" while these programs are going on?

    1. Re:Is it just me ... by phil+reed · · Score: 1

      All your cycles are belong to us?

      --

      ...phil
      "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  45. Lost work completion on RC5 by LoudMusic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I started RC5-64 just shortly after it was actually completed back in July ... I was ranked on the daily board in the top 120 so I was making heavy ground on a few of my friends.

    Then one day it just stops updating ... "what the fizuck?" ... then I find out that the solution had been found. I was about a week away from passing a competetive friend of mine ... DOH! Then I find out that all the work my computers had done was obliterated because it didn't really mean anything anyway. Just marvelous.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  46. ECCp-109 has been solved by mrroot · · Score: 3, Funny

    now we can finally start working on ECCp-110. Excitement abound.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  47. Re:Correct quote... or so I am told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and he also forgot "the direction of the erection" and "the torque of the pork".

    BTW, this stuff was already old when I was in engineering school in the '70s. It certainly wasn't original when Bevis said it.

  48. Commonality does not imply Causality by andrew_lewis · · Score: 1

    Just because there's a similarity in the group doesn't mean its the cause. 100% of people who die have at one point breathed air. If we could just stop breathing air, we'd never die.

    1. Re:Commonality does not imply Causality by Spoing · · Score: 1
      As I've said elsewhere: 'The comment I made was focused on a specific set of situations -- that was not claimed to apply in different situations -- and where there are exceptions. Take it for what it's worth.'

      While 'commonality does not imply causality' in this case it is an indicator for research at a minimum and a strong hint that certian behaviors should be avoided because of the increased risk. It doesn't mean -- and I did not imply -- that cancer -- even for those areas of the body -- is caused only by alcohol and tobacco product use.

      Agreed, or are you just complaining about the lack of philosophical rigor (something I didn't claim)?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  49. 3x+1 by verloren · · Score: 1

    I participate in this project, looking at a mathematical problem that I barely understand. Why? Because it requires very little network traffic (about 20k every couple of months) so it's unobtrusive, but still delivers the sense of doing something that seti@home and similar projects do (though it's not going to cure cancer like the UD team might).

  50. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Fuzion · · Score: 1

    I can prove any real number m, equals any real number n.

    0 = 0
    0m = 0n
    0m/0 = 0n/0
    m = n
    Q.E.D.

    --
    "Knowledge makes us accountable." - Che Guevara
  51. The slashdot crowd runs Windows most of the time.. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    You wish! I see you have your own website. Enable user-agent and web-site referral logging on your Apache (you're running Apache on Linux according to netcraft), and see the stunning truth. Won't be many Linux machines, even Macs seem to outnumber them (you should see at least one Mac, since I just visited your site).

  52. What's next? by sharkey · · Score: 2

    I propose solving the ID10T problem.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  53. Re:SHOWER, THAT IS. DAMN OPEN SOURCE SLASHCHODE CR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    i preferred it when i wasn't sure if you meant 'shit' or 'shower'.

    you could have gotten double troll points for other troll tie-ins, referring to Fecal Troll Matter and the shit-Journal dude (cant remember that name).

  54. Damn, it sucks to be a moderator at times like ths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm searching for the "-1 Too fucking stupid to get the joke," but it's just not there. Neither is "-1 Irrelevant nitpick." It's just sad.

  55. God is busy by Glonoinha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually right now he is in custody, explaining the ballistics of a fully laden .223 round.
    Later on he goes to tryouts for the goatse.cx cover model, sponsored by the Federal Bad Guy Rehab Prison.

    Yea, I'm going to hell for that one.

    --
    Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    1. Re:God is busy by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

      Dammit! I have a mod point left, but there's no "+1 Blasphemous" option. Oh well, you get this reply instead. Keep it up. ;-)

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  56. Re:Correct quote... or so I am told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    you should walka mile in their shoes

    walka-walka-bing-bang-boom?

  57. Re:It's been asked before, but... by dmatos · · Score: 1

    I'm sure you've seen the hole in this proof before, but when you factor out the (a - a), you're actually dividing both sides of the equation by zero, which is a big no-no, and will actually lead to an undefined solution.

    If you want to divide equations by common factors to simplify them, you first need to stipulate that the common factors are not zero. That's pretty hard to do if the common factor is (a - a).

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  58. Will slashdot please hire an editor? by neurojab · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Now" and "No" are not the same word. They vaguely sound the same and have much the same spelling, but CANNOT be used interchangeably. In fact, such interchange could be disastrous given the worst-case context. Imagine the questions "Should I shoot?" or "Is the building clear for demolition?" or "Is Windows ready for mission critical applications?". Clearly "now" and "no" are not the same word, and I trust slashdot editors will check for this in the future.

  59. Distributed Computing Projects by SparkyTWP · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who are looking for worthy projects to donate to, here's a good list of what is happening in the field of distributed projects, sorted by subject.

  60. Re:Correct quote... or so I am told... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's "heat of the beat".

    The original poster still had it wrong though. It's not inversely proportional. It's directly proportional.

  61. Even better yet... by swordboy · · Score: 2

    or better yet, slashdot should start a feature dedicated to worthwhile distributed computing projects.

    Why not lobby for distributed and P2P features right in the Linux kernel itself?

    Scenario:

    You install the now-getting-more-user-friendly Linux distro of the month on Grandma's PC. During installation, you are prompted to "use this PC's free time for GNU distributed/p2p assistance?". After answering affirmatively, you can then select a worthy cause such as protein folding or even delegate access to a centralized Linux group who could then use it for open-source fundraising / what not.

    The P2P thing is a whole 'nother mess but I suppose that if someone implemented P2P sharing/mirroring on an open source level and then created an approval procedure required to (legally) have a file submission mass-mirrored to millons of PCs world-wide.

    There is money in there somewhere...

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Even better yet... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2
      Why not lobby for distributed and P2P features right in the Linux kernel itself?


      Woah, hold on a second ... you mean in Linux distributions, not the kernel, right? (Just clarifying ...from the rest of your comment, I think that's what you meant.)

      That aside, I like the idea. Anyone here have any clout within the major distros? It should pretty much just be a matter of adding the relevant program to the distribution ... and I don't see any real downsides.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  62. disappearing thread? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what happenned to "registrar told to stop direct mail scare tactics"? it's gone!

  63. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Alex+Farber · · Score: 1

    Ok, let's look... 6 nerds have replied to this joke sofar.

  64. If anyone else is interested by Dexx · · Score: 1

    If anybody else is interested, you can help out with my distrbuted project. Just download the client here or you can pick up an alternate client from one of the many other sources on the net. You can post in reply to this and let me know your ip after you've installed the client and I'll set you up...

    --
    Feel the fear and do it anyway.
  65. Back in my day... by Nordberg · · Score: 1

    Back in my day we just had a million monkeys on a million typewriters.

    Madhouse: Satirized for your protection"

    --
    *Splort*
    1. Re:Back in my day... by cheesyfru · · Score: 2

      So calculate the result yourself. Decide what constitutes a Shakespeare work, which characters need to match (say, [A-Z]), and calculate the number of permutations of your character set are needed to create something that matches (26 * 26 * 26 * ...). If you care about the answer to questions like this, get a good mathematician to spend an hour to give you the result. Don't waste billions of hours of CPU time proving something we already know.

  66. Don't you mean... by distributed.karma · · Score: 2

    "no we can finally start..." ;-)

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  67. Divided by zero by sjbe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    (a + a)(a - a) = a(a - a)
    Divide by the common (a - a) factor...


    (a - a) = 0
    [a*(a - a)] / 0 = undefined
    Therefore: Proof = NOT
    QED

  68. DC Project I would like to see... by Midwedge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Instead of an infinite number of monkeys at typewriters, have a DC project randomly generate text, and see how long it takes to write Shakespeare..... Pointless ... Yes But why not?

    1. Re:DC Project I would like to see... by crimoid · · Score: 2

      Funny. In college I had a 486 that was attempting to do just this. During some testing it took weeks just to match a test paragraph.

  69. Not Magic Marker, by TalkingToes · · Score: 1

    write it using white-out on your screen, blondie..

    --
    5'16" is easy math, so why do so many miss it?
  70. Re:Damn, it sucks to be a moderator at times like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He DID sort of write out "divide by common (a-a) factor." One can surmise that he MIGHT have noticed the division by zero if he took the time to actually write it out.

    I agree with the AC (rare occasion).

  71. Link to the UD forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you go:

    http://forum.ud.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=fo ru m;f=5

    The above link will take you to the UD suggestion area of their official forums. Post your desires for a Linux client there. If the thousands and thousands of interested Linux users quickly signed up for a UD forum account and posted their interest, I'm sure something would be done.

    But of course, I'm betting on plenty of lazy people who will read this, and dismiss it.

    1. Re:Link to the UD forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://forum.ud.com/ubbcgi/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=foru m;f=5

      ^^ Correct Link, sorry. :)

    2. Re:Link to the UD forums by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF.. I post the link twice as it appears and a space is somehow inserted between the "u" and the "m".

      Just copy/paste the url and remove the space in the URL between the 'u' and the 'm'.

      Sigh. ;)

    3. Re:Link to the UD forums by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Just slashcode with its protection from page widening posts - trolls who would post long strings to stretch the page.
      Better than *shudder* horizontal scrolling...

  72. Re:Damn, it sucks to be a moderator at times like by jeblucas · · Score: 2
    "-1 Too fucking stupid to get the joke,"
    Heh, no kidding. I fully deserve that -1 Troll, but the "helpful" folks who told me where my mistake was (6 at last count! SIX!) need to be modded down in life. Mouthbreathers.

    That said: this spurious proof is the reason why division by 0 is "not allowed". Every kid hears this rule in primary school, and most assume it has something to do with infinite values and whatever else, but that's just not true. Division by zero is undefined because tolerating it makes for uncomfortable number systems where every number is equal to every other. As demonstrated by derf #4 in this thread.

    --
    blarg.
  73. Re:Correct quote... or so I am told... by default+luser · · Score: 1

    No, the quote is correct.

    The quote was muttered while watching a video with a repetitive "Cigarette Dangles..." lyric.

    Of course, it's not as good as Beavis trying to "speak French" and sing along with a video ( really Japanese, but they think it's French ).

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  74. Not by me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the Poincare conjecture article.

  75. I'm shocked that all of you would ignore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the fact that a petrified Natalie Portman and her love-toy Monkeyboy Ballmer have poured hot grits down their pants onto a beowulf cluster of goatse.cx servers. Shocked, do you hear me?

  76. It has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Collect cycles
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

    All your cycles are belong to us.

    Idle every CPU for great justice.

  77. Re:It's been asked before, but... by swillden · · Score: 2

    Divide by the common (a - a) factor...

    Duh... you're supposed to make 0 more complicated than that before dividing by it. Otherwise the hole is just too obvious.

    If you're gonna do screwed up proofs, do them right.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  78. When can I make money off distributed computing? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2

    I have unused cycles for sale to the highest bidder! I am impressed by this article, but how soon until one could make a few pennies off this?

    And when that is possible, maybe this is the way /. could make a buck instead of having advertisments. If you choose to load a /. distributed client then you get better membership in some way. Slashdot gets the $ for your unused cycles. Of course they would make 8 different versions for *nix, bsd, osx and such before they ever get around to the windoze version.

  79. Re:The slashdot crowd runs Windows most of the tim by Malc · · Score: 2

    Or check out Google Zeitgeist. Linux is standing at 1%. Although there will be a higher percentage of Linux users here, there won't be that many more. A lot of the people who go on about Linux (including me!) use Windows on the desktop, often at work where there's no choice, or at home because it's easy.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Cheap advertising by alhobbel · · Score: 1
    Well, my congratulations to the contributors to the ECCp-109-project.
    BTW, did anyone realise these 'excercises' provided by Certicom are meant to generate cheap advertising ($10,000 USD is not much to pay for a zillion hours of computertime)?
    Now their (potential) customers can drool over those incredible figures.

    Anywho, I'll show those guys. My graduate thesis will feature a O(log n)-algorithm to compute discrete logarithms. Damn, just realised I encrypted it using ECCp-131 and lost the key! OK, no biggie, everybody just donate computertime to solve it and help a poor guy out ;-)
    My thesis will be posted here in about 2.3x10^6 days, until then, to quote Andrew Wiles who devoted about 10 years of his life to prove the essential connection between elliptic curves and modular forms and thereby Fermat's last theorem: I'm tired now, I think I'll go to bed :-).

  82. can i have your cycles by paradesign · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ive had this same rendering going for like 15hrs now and its only half done on my P4 1.4 box. just a few of your cycles would really help.

    but seriously, what if Pixar did a distributed thing to get its movies rendered faster, wveryone gets like a fraction of a few frames at a time, which are then rendered and sent back to be composited to form an image? id be down.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  83. Re:It's been asked before, but... by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 1

    >Here's my proof:
    >a = a
    >a^2 = a^2
    >a^2 - a^2 = a^2 - a^2
    >Factor both sides, one by binomial, the other by >a

    Okay i'll bite, while i undertand that this is "too obvious a hole" and that it's supposed to be a joke, ala " there is no spoon.. wait we're all spoons!" you still missed a single point regardless:
    >(a + a)(a - a) = a(a - a)
    >Divide by the common (a - a) factor...
    >(a + a) = a
    Wrong! it would be (a + a)(a - a) = 2a^2 -2a^2
    whereby you divide by the common factor (a - a)
    and instead of:
    >2a = a
    it's actually 2a =2a, not:
    >2 = 1

    Please people, i know this is pendantic, but come on! if anything most of us get our jollies with minutie, why else would we go *so* in depth regarding ST/SW/B5 Crypto and so on and so forth. please do your math.

  84. Lots of projects... by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 1

    Go here. Now. It's the most complete listing of distributed computing I've ever found. Has the usual, like folding and SETI, but also neat things like Distributed Proofreading and finding as-of-yet unknown comets. A must-see! Forty-Two thumbs up!

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
  85. Re:The slashdot crowd runs Windows most of the tim by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
    I know, I'm guilty myself (though I finally bought a second harddisk to put Linux on, instead of giving it a meager 4Gig). At home I either use W2K with Phoenis/Mozilla or my iBook with Chimera/Mozilla, servers are of course BSD. At work, well, no choice there... W2K on IE6, a shame...

    On my own personal webserver I see quite some Macs, I once even had a Sun machine visiting, and one or two Linux machines. Yes, it is linked from slashdot (but not from this account).

  86. Spot the /.! (ugh, it rhymes!) by Jouster · · Score: 2

    This is my favorite part of the whole ECCp-109 site.

    Hmm, I wonder what day the story was posted....

    Jouster

  87. Re:Second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO WAY!!!

  88. Re:It's been asked before, but... by nebenfun · · Score: 2, Funny

    he divided by a donut hole...
    not a zero...

    nbfn

  89. Distributed Folding Rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Distributed Folding!

    If you've got 256M+ RAM it's twice as fast, and their programmers actually answer mails and post replies on the forum.

  90. Very sad day ... Linus Torvalds dead at 32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just read some sad news on the net - the popular software writer Linus Torvalds author of the (in)famous (crappy experimental piece of sh..) software known as Linux, was found dead near a motorway rest area in his native country Finland. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to the geek culture. Truly a looser icon.

  91. Linux and Cancer by ASeed · · Score: 1

    mmmm
    Is that what Microsoft means when they say that Linux is a Cancer? ;)

    --

    --
    ACid
  92. Only a little bit in trouble by geekotourist · · Score: 2

    I don't specifically know what Certicom did, but generally for challenges like this (for example, the EFF's primes prizes), money is set aside ahead of time. As for Certicom itself, after laying off 70-80% of the company and closing down most US operations, it has a reasonable burn rate- it could go for a couple of years with its current revenue.

  93. Re:Damn, it sucks to be a moderator at times like by mvpll · · Score: 1

    Division by zero is undefined because tolerating it makes for uncomfortable number systems where every number is equal to every other.

    Actually it is undefined because there is no definitive answer to a division by zero.
    How many zeroes do you need to add together to get one?

  94. Much faster than expected by billstewart · · Score: 2
    According to Certicom, they expected the challenge to take 90 million machine-days to complete. But The Winners say they took 547 days, with 10308 members. They don't list how many machine days they got (presumably it ramped up as they went along), but that multiplies out to ~5.5 million machine-days.

    So where's the discrepancy? Did we get really lucky and hit the answer 5% of the way through the search? Do the "10308 members" really represent 10 machines each? Did the initial estimate assume 500MHz machines and by 547 days later, most people were running 1.5GHz machines? Or did the implementers do some good programming hacks to make a much faster search program? Or was one of the implementors using Pixar's rendering cluster at night in between movies?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. Side Effects of ClimatePrediction.net by billstewart · · Score: 2

    So Oxford University is planning to study changes in climate - by feeding large quantities of electricity (mostly generated by burning fossil fuels) to large numbers of heat-generating CPU chips, contributing to global warming. Sounds like a Heisenbug to me....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks