Slashdot Mirror


Junkyard Wars Wants You!

Dan Messinger writes "Bring On The Junk! Junkyard Wars is looking for new contestants to compete on the 2003 series. Teams of contestants are given ten hours to build a machine to solve a specific challenge using parts they salvage from a junkyard. In contrast to previous seasons, this year we are looking for individual applicants who are skilled at putting together sophisticated machinery and not afraid of getting their hands dirty. Successful candidates will possess a strong background in engineering, fabrication and a good mechanical 'know how.' Junkyard Wars wants applications from people of all ages, races, creeds, colors, sexes, religions, and sexual orientations, as well as people with physical disabilities. We are especially interested in applications from women and/or people of color, as previous crops of contenders have been underrepresented among these groups. Lots of kids watch Junkyard Wars and we want to show them that anyone can grow up to be the world's greatest mechanic or engineer! If you think you match the description or you know of someone who does - please log onto our website and apply: you will find the application forms as well as all of the information that you need regarding applying. Application deadline is February 28, 2003."

372 comments

  1. PC! by Gannoc · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been saying for years that we need more hispanic lesbians building robots on TV. Count me IN!

    1. Re:PC! by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I think you forgot "handicapped"

      they gotta be in wheelchairs and maybe slur their words.

      then you are talking pure gold.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    2. Re:PC! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but are they allowed to bring in items on their tool belt to use in the competition?

    3. Re:PC! by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 4, Funny
      I've been saying for years that we need more hispanic lesbians building robots on TV
      So that's how they breed. I always wondered.
      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    4. Re:PC! by giel · · Score: 1

      Toolbelt? Hispanic lesbian? No, you can't attend wearing a strap-on.

      --
      giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
    5. Re:PC! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'v always thought a one-armed, one-eyed bisexual hermaphrodite eskimo would rock on that show!

      But hey, I'm a bit kinky...

    6. Re:PC! by hector_pelviscube! · · Score: 0, Troll

      whah abou us retahds? we wanna pway too! we wike game! thih ih a fun game! theh leh aww kinna peopow pway, wight?

    7. Re:PC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't up to date on dyke stereotypes, it seems...

    8. Re:PC! by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's one-armed, one-eyed bisexual hermaphrodite INUIT, you insensitive clod!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:PC! by computechnica · · Score: 0

      There is already a pR0n movie called Junkyard Dykes. Best scene is the Dildo attached to the cordless hammer drill %^O

    10. Re:PC! by rabandy · · Score: 1

      Fucking Hispa Lesbos.

    11. Re:PC! by zrk · · Score: 1

      oh, for the love of...

      It's physically-challenged, you insensitive MCP clod!

  2. Sounds like fun by mhaisley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like fun, they have a diversity problem they want you to solve. Its amazing that this day in age we are still this worried about diversity, they probably got threatened by their network and/or the fcc. Anyways, I'm still going to apply, it's a good oppertunity.

    1. Re:Sounds like fun by chris09876 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree completely. I don't think diversity should even be an issue. ...why does it matter? If someone is qualified to be on the show, more power to them! Heh, I'm in computer engineering at the university of waterloo. About 70% of my class is chinese... and it's great :-) I'm learning all sorts of curse words and tasty new foods. I don't know why the asian percentage of my class is so high, but it must be 'cause they were the most qualified people that applied. It's a good rule to follow... letting the most qualified people participate. It shouldn't matter what race/age/gender/disability status they are.

    2. Re:Sounds like fun by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I agree. when I hear people mentioning that they need to diversify something - especially something like this which is esentially an acedemic area - it makes me want to smack someone.

      there are occasions (okay... every day really) where I wish certain books could be handed out to everyone in the world and they would then have to read them.
      Usually the book that comes to mind is Sagan's "Demon Haunted World" - but in the case I think I would have to go with Pinker's "Blank Slate"

      I wish more people thought like me ;)

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:Sounds like fun by Naikrovek · · Score: 1

      They don't have a network, they're licensing their show to Discovery, and their wholly owned subsidiary, TLC.

      The company (RDFMedia.com) is based in London, and the FCC doesn't give a poo about how many minorities you have on your show, anyway.

      However, Cathy Rogers (the creator of both Junkyard Wars and Full Metal Challenge) is head of the LA office of RDFMedia.com, the office that is in charge of the production of the two shows. Also, she is a total babe.

    4. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Represent UW Comp Eng!

      I'd say more like 50% Chinese and Korean... there's a large percentage of Indians and Persians as well.

    5. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Too bad that they feel 'obligated' to emphasize that certain groups are more desirable than other groups.

    6. Re:Sounds like fun by ajakk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While normally I would agree with you, you must notice that this show is entertainment, not some actual competitive event. They want a greater diversity of contestants because they want to appeal to a greater diversity of audiences. While I doubt that it will actually work, what is wrong for them wanting to expand their viewership?

    7. Re:Sounds like fun by SN74S181 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I would agree, except this isn't quite yet the 'globalized world' that the idealists are striving for. Therefore, heavily subsidiezed educational institutions should stop admitting high proportions of students who won't contribute to the subsidizing tax base after graduation.

      The old saw about 'we as a people need to invest more in education' falls apart if 'we as an economy' are paying to subisdize the education of members of seperate economies. Sure, it funds those permanent denizens of the educational institutions (who, not surprisingly, are the loudest voices in the 'we as a people....' outcry) but it represents a knowledge drain on our culture.

    8. Re:Sounds like fun by mattreilly · · Score: 1

      I wish more people thought like me ;)

      Shudder to think.

    9. Re:Sounds like fun by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Diversity on this show is crucial because, as a Hispanic engineering student, I can only be entertained by people that throw out spanish words and that are eating taquitos on the set.

      Why does diversity ALWAYS mean race (btw, I think Asians are getting pretty close to losing any preferential treatment, the other minorities have a little resentment towards them because they have been so successful), ethnicity, sexual orientation, handicap status etc?

      Diversity for Junk Yard Wars should be something like we need more people with Electrical backgrounds, machinists or something like that.

      Also, how are they going to check to see if you are gay? Seriously, how many gay men know a lot about building stuff? Are the various interior decorating shows actively seeking more straight men? No, of course not.

    10. Re:Sounds like fun by mattreilly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, how are they going to check to see if you are gay? Seriously, how many gay men know a lot about building stuff? Are the various interior decorating shows actively seeking more straight men? No, of course not.

      Well, put down your taco for a second and get a job, maybe then you'll understand.

      Did that bother you? Maybe now you understand why making generalizations about people is a bad thing. Come on people, this is after school special 101, grow up.

    11. Re:Sounds like fun by LighthouseJ · · Score: 1

      I'm in computer engineering at ODU and I'm definitely in the minority (being caucasian). However, we have more indian (not american indian) people, much more than chinese, egyptian, persian, or caucasian. The indian guys come in big groups that fill the entire sidewalk, enough that you need to walk in the grass to get around them. At least they understand things alot quicker than other people when I show someone how to do something. I hear that the reason why there are so many indians is that our school searches out students from particular regions of the world, else how could they all know to come here? At any rate, they are pretty good people, they don't disrespect anything and they actually care about doing well in school rather than squeaking by (like me).

    12. Re:Sounds like fun by BugMaster+ChuckyD · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly its not about being "PC" or anythiong like that its about demographics and selling ads. If they get a more diverse group of contestants they think they might get a more diverse (and therefore larger) audience.

      1. Diversity
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    13. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waterloser.

    14. Re:Sounds like fun by Funkitup · · Score: 1

      It's not just that they want to appeal to a more diverse audience, more that they want to demonstrate that ability (and mechanical ability) is not determined by race. Also, TV rightly so feels it has a duty to properly represent the population. Maybe there are a disproportionate number of white engineers in the states, but I don't think it's right that it should be portrayed that way to the nation's youth.

      Also it would make the show more interesting if it was more multicultural. Sorry for the stereotyping, but it would be really funny to watch a crackpot team of vietnamese engineers build a wacky contraption that defeats all US attempts.

    15. Re:Sounds like fun by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I have a job, I do understand.

      No it didn't bother me (tacos are awesome, though I am not mexican).

      I was mostly joking, but how many effiminate(which I do realize is different than being gay but they are often related) men have you seen on junkyard wars, or working in professions like engineering etc.

      Generalizations are a bad thing? Is that not a generalization?

    16. Re:Sounds like fun by JCMay · · Score: 1

      Yes. In the past they've had WAY too many welders!

    17. Re:Sounds like fun by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      Steelworkers of America, unite!

    18. Re:Sounds like fun by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Or are they planning to do it in the style of that new show "Escape from Experiment Island" (or whatever it's called)? You know the one... where they stick a team together of people who don't know each other then make them build crap and watch them argue and junk, with time penalties and the like.

      I guess it would be ok if they kept the same "format" where they have 10 hours to build their machines then "The next day, they race!" I don't think I'd like this "random team" business though... sounds kinda... ripoffy (if that's even a word, which it probably isn't)

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    19. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the proper 'differentiation' between the 2 groups is 'Dot' Indian vs. 'Feather' Indian. :-)

    20. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting a bunch of homeboys to watch Scrapheap challenge? Don't think so.

    21. Re:Sounds like fun by Bunji+X · · Score: 2, Funny

      Steelworkers of America, keep reaching for that rainbow!

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    22. Re:Sounds like fun by revery · · Score: 1

      While I doubt that it will actually work, what is wrong for them wanting to expand their viewership?

      Nothing is "wrong" with it. In fact I believe they should be able to focus on only a certain group (gender/racial/sexual orientation minority group) of contenstants if they wanted to.
      But, if they choose a contestant because of some quality other than their qualifications for building robots out of junk, they may not have as interesting a show.
      It's tough to balance some requirements, especially where certain abilities and interests may have a demographic skew of their own (i.e. more men take engineering classes than women. it may denote a gender bias, it may not, I don't really care, but the bottom line is, you have less female engineers to choose from)

    23. Re:Sounds like fun by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      ...TV rightly so feels it has a duty to properly represent the population.
      vs.
      "Maybe there are a disproportionate number of white engineers in the states, but I don't think it's right that it should be portrayed that way to the nation's youth."

      So pick one. Either TV represents reality, or it's a propaganda machine. (Which seems to be okay, so long as it's "for the children...")
      But be aware that if you advocate serving propaganda to the masses, you perpetuate the problems by hiding the evidence that inequities exist.
      Think about it.

    24. Re:Sounds like fun by Mr.Coffee · · Score: 1

      ...
      1. Diversity
      2. ???
      3. Profit!...


      is it just me, or is this form of quoting south park quickly becoming the equivalent of "imageing a beowulf cluster of these!"

      --
      Cogito Eggo Sum, I think therefore I'm a waffle
    25. Re:Sounds like fun by Mythias · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Full Metal Challenge, maybe they have had a much higher level of ratings internationally with that show because they feature teams from different countries.

      For example, they've had Chinese, Australians, Indians, etc.

      Maybe they want to have some of the same sort of success with JW as they have with FMC.

      (This is assuming they HAVE had international success with it. I dunno.)

      Hey are both of the Rogers girls on those two shows sisters? I could go for a good Rogering right about now.

    26. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      btw, I think Asians are getting pretty close to losing any preferential treatment, the other minorities have a little resentment towards them because they have been so successful

      WTF?!? How many asians do you see on popular TV? I say we need more hot asian chicks on TV shows!

    27. Re:Sounds like fun by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1
      Sounds like fun, they have a diversity problem they want you to solve. Its amazing that this day in age we are still this worried about diversity, they probably got threatened by their network and/or the fcc. Anyways, I'm still going to apply, it's a good oppertunity.

      For all the grousing about "political correctness", don't forget that Cathy Rogers herself is in the show because the network (Channel 4) wanted a female co-host to widen the demographics a bit.

      ...laura

    28. Re:Sounds like fun by DroppedPacket · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe now you understand why making generalizations about people is a bad thing. Making generalizations is not a bad thing. It is vital to A) survival, and B) it creates a baseline of "knowledge" that can be modified in individual instances. I'll bet you generalize all the time but rationalize it. Try these on for size:

      Republicans want to starve children and take health care away from the elderly

      People who drive SUVs are bad

      African-Americans vote for Democrats

      Whites are greedy bastards who oppress everybody else

      So why is it important for survival to generalize? Imagine that a group is out trying to gather some food. One of them eats some red berries and keels over dead. The intelligent berry picker thinks, "Aha. Red berries bad. Kill Thag," and then avoids them. The non-generalizing berry picker thinks, "Thag ate bad berries. They must have been bad. But these berries are from a different bush next to those bad berries, so they are OK." Next thing you know, Ogg is taking a dirt nap with Thag.

      Absurd? Not really. This is the way survival goes. Humans need to generalize in order to process the vast amounts of information available to us. Generalizations for individuals may not be valid, but over a statistical sampling, they are. (If you don't believe me, don't bother taking any medication. It gets approved via generalized studies over a test group.)

      All stereotypes have some basis, either from group observations, or from a deliberatly propaganda myth. (Observation about Group X being evil because they eat live babies goes here as an exmple of a propaganda myth that gets believed.)

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    29. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hummmm? and How many of these 70% are gonna go back to china and help them build better nukes? i dunno call me paranoid but i don`t trust people who kill it`s citizens for body parts...

    30. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not another big-endian/little-endian war!!!

    31. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This site desperatly needs a (-1, Fucking Lame) moderation. These would be used on all

      -Beowulf cluster
      -Profit!
      -Insensitive clod

      jokes. So fuck you.

    32. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an ass

    33. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I doubt that it will actually work, what is wrong for them wanting to expand their viewership?

      Uhm, it's discriminatory?

      Really, what you're seeing here is, "White males need not apply." Why is this acceptable to so many people? Could you imagine if they said "Hispanics/blacks/women/(insert other minority group here) need not apply"?

      You see, discrimination is OK, so long as we're only discriminating against white males. Personally, I find this one way street disturbing.

    34. Re:Sounds like fun by ryanwright · · Score: 1

      While I doubt that it will actually work, what is wrong for them wanting to expand their viewership?

      Uhm, it's discriminatory?

      Really, what you're seeing here is, "White males need not apply." Why is this acceptable to so many people? Could you imagine if they said "Hispanics/blacks/women/(insert other minority group here) need not apply"?

      You see, discrimination is OK, so long as we're only discriminating against white males. Personally, I find this one way street disturbing.

      (Sorry for the duplicate, I accidentally posted this as AC the first time)

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    35. Re:Sounds like fun by Pope · · Score: 1

      No they're not sisters. It was just a coincidence.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    36. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am guessing your both white men? Who are experts one Race relations.

    37. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, what you're seeing here is, "White males need not apply." Why is this acceptable to so many people? Could you imagine if they said "Hispanics/blacks/women/(insert other minority group here) need not apply"?

      Except that they aren't saying that; they'll still accept white males who meet their needs (and probably that'll make up most of the chosen), and women who don't will not get on.

      The minority groups may get preferential treatment, but that's not such a problem here. Yes, it is discrimination - in the meaning of 'choice' rather than 'prejudice'. The applicants are NOT picked solely on their technical ability, there are many other factors including audience appeal, interest, personality, character and balance. If women were overrepresented on the show, they'd be justified in calling for more men.

      You see, discrimination is OK, so long as we're only discriminating against white males. Personally, I find this one way street disturbing.

      Discrimination is okay provided it is done based on facts and not prejudices. Here, the facts are not strictly limited to mechanical ability, and presenting well-rounded teams on the show is an important factor.

    38. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest that the Yes Minister "Equal Opportunities" episode be broadcast to everyone :)

    39. Re:Sounds like fun by MonopolyNews · · Score: 1

      the problem with that theory is that "most qualified" is not an objectively determinate thing. The subjectivity allows a lot of bias to enter in dressed as objective measure. Fact of life, and people noticed it, and that's how we got to this point. Think of it as a distasteful medicine. Or not if you prefer.

      --

      Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
    40. Re:Sounds like fun by MonopolyNews · · Score: 1

      the issue being that 90% of ethnic generalizations are of the propagandic origin. My favorite example, is the Polish. Stupid? Like Copernicus? Mendelbrot? and Stanislaw Lem. Of course, unfortunately most people do not appreciate my favorite example. And what if you generalize that ALL berries are poison. You will miss out on some good berries in that case.

      --

      Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
    41. Re:Sounds like fun by MonopolyNews · · Score: 1

      >Diversity for Junk Yard Wars should be something like we need more people with Electrical backgrounds, machinists or something like that. although I've been arguing for the need for diversity, in which I truly believe, you have the best counter point as it's still pro-diversity.

      --

      Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
    42. Re:Sounds like fun by Funkitup · · Score: 1

      I meant represent the population as a whole and its cultural / ethnic makeup.

      Mechanical engineering *ability* (not opportunities!!!) has little correlation to cultural or ethnic background. (Saying anything other to that would be flamebait.) So, while a tv show portraying qualified engineers as having a white majority in the us might have some factual content, it would not represent the engineering potential and it would not represent the population.

      Having shown that it is not actual propaganda (i.e. a distortion of the truth), even if it was it would still be a good thing. There is nothing wrong with showing that non-whites can be engineers.

      Furthermore, if you want evidence about inequities then that is the job for race watchdogs to publish. By portraying the world as a happy multicultural place it surely makes it more likely to become a reality.

    43. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here, the facts are not strictly limited to mechanical ability, and presenting well-rounded teams on the show is an important factor.

      I am glad to see that you want certain groups to have a 5% suitability deduction from their application score based on their membership in one group.

      I can hear the judge say to the jury: "You know that 1 of you 12 jury members has to vote to not convict the criminal defendant because he is in a favored minority group".

      'well rounded' is a code phrase for 'lower standards'

      I suppose you want your airline pilot to be 'well rounded' since it will make you feel more comfortable riding in his airplane.

      You cannot apply one set of rules to everyone and a different set of rules to yourself.

    44. Re:Sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > TV rightly so feels it has a duty to properly represent the population.

      Is that why the married hetero male is the least numerous TV character?

      I guess that's representative of the general population.

      > TV rightly so feels it has a duty to properly represent the population.

      Not really since many in that industry have a very liberal skewed view of the demographics of the general population.

      I don't seem to rember di-versity training including any 'be sensitive to males' training.

      Colleges have
      women's studies
      latino studies
      black studies
      and so on

      but no
      males studies
      white studies

      If you advocate di-versity, then it should apply to you also.

    45. Re:Sounds like fun by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      apparently you didn't get the memo that this:

      1. Diversity
      2. ???
      3. Profit!


      is no longer cool.

    46. Re:Sounds like fun by Funkitup · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm not an american, I only know what the case is in Britain. I'm sure the white heterosexual male is treated as a norm far more on tv than any other. It certainly is by the hollywood films, sitcoms and soap operas we get to watch made by your

      I believe whites are almost in a minority in the states now anyway?

      There is a field of 'masculinity studies' which does study male issues. Maybe there should be more programmes discussing the white male role in society, because they are clearly too dominant!

    47. Re:Sounds like fun by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Amen to the hot asian chicks comment.

      I agree even more if you count eurasians.

      --Joey

  3. Underrepresentation? by doc_traig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... as previous crops of contenders have been underrepresented among these groups.

    Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!

    --
    So long, michael. Don't let the door hit you...
    1. Re:Underrepresentation? by gowen · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!
      You're right, they are. But most of that is cultural[0]: women were told they couldn't be engineers, so they didn't become engineers. Positive discrimination, as the call for contestants says, can help change those perceptions. This is good. Diversity is a good thing. Monocultures are boring.

      Also, more hot chicks wear I work would be great (*damn* did I say that out loud?)

      [0] Unless you believe that only white males are genetically predisposed to becoming capable engineers, in which case, well ... you're a moron.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Underrepresentation? by sydlexic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, more hot chicks wear I work would be great (*damn* did I say that out loud?)

      what's an "I work" and how do you wear one?

    3. Re:Underrepresentation? by gowen · · Score: 2, Funny



      Jesus, thats one of the dumbest things I've ever typed. *where*, *where*, *where*

      I am an idiot.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    4. Re:Underrepresentation? by Uerige · · Score: 1
      Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!
      You're right, they are. But most of that is cultural[0]:
      [...]
      [0] Unless you believe that only white males are genetically predisposed to becoming capable engineers, in which case, well ... you're a moron.

      Or, perchance, a mormon.
    5. Re:Underrepresentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the women I know do not want to become engineers. Not because they are discriminated against, but because it's not what they want to do. They find it boring. In my school, females are a large majority of biology and veterinary science majors. Does this mean males are discriminated against in biology and veterinary science?

      Also, if monocultures are boring, should traditionally black colleges diversify by beginning to admit whites and non-black minorities?

    6. Re:Underrepresentation? by gowen · · Score: 1
      Not because they are discriminated against, but because it's not what they want to do
      You miss the point. Why is it not what they want to do? It's either genetical or societal, and I don't believe that women are genetical disposed against it...

      Also, if monocultures are boring, should traditionally black colleges diversify by beginning to admit whites and non-black minorities?
      Yes, they should.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    7. Re:Underrepresentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!
      Absolutely! So, by that token, if they get lots of people from that group applying, then they're artificially overrepresenting them from the available pool..
      It's really getting my goat that people say certain groups are 'underrepresented', and so want to bolster applications from people of particular genders, races, religions or whatever..
      If a certain amount of people reply, then they're represented, according to the amount of people in the group that actually have an interest. So, they're perfectly represented.
      I wish they'd get over this hangup, and just solicit applications from interested people. Then they'd get the interested (and likely good) people, rather than trying to shoehorn random people who may otherwise fail the application criteria into a show, possibly making them look inept when it gets to the shoot.
      When asking for applications, just ask for the interested, and do whatever selection necessary behind the scenes, else, it all starts to look like a politically correct stunt at the expense of the people they're targetting for application.

    8. Re:Underrepresentation? by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

      I work? Must be apple's line of clothing ;-)

    9. Re:Underrepresentation? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      *wipes tea off the screen* It's funny because it's often true... though, mormons are more likely to think it of mormon white males... not white males in general...

    10. Re:Underrepresentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's either genetical or societal, and I don't believe that women are genetical disposed against it...

      I don't think you'll find many people who give a damn what you believe. Unless you have some proof, your beliefs aren't worth any more than anyone elses.

    11. Re:Underrepresentation? by gowen · · Score: 1
      your beliefs aren't worth any more than anyone elses.
      They're worth more than yours, because I have the cojones to put my name to them, coward boy.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    12. Re:Underrepresentation? by Moloch666 · · Score: 1

      Relax, I didn't even notice just read it like it sounded I guess. Don't succumb to the spelling nazis... unless you are one of them ;)

      --
      Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
    13. Re:Underrepresentation? by archeopterix · · Score: 1
      [0] Unless you believe that only white males are genetically predisposed to becoming capable engineers, in which case, well ... you're a moron.
      As far as I know, the debate on genetical vs social background of capabilities hasn't been scientifically resolved.You might want to read :

      "Brain Sex:The Real Difference Between Men & Women"

      Anne Moir, Ph.D. and David Jessel

      Of course you might also pick one alternative as the only truth and call anyone who disagrees with it a moron.

    14. Re:Underrepresentation? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Anybody who thinks that statistical studies have anything to do with what any individual in a population is capable of is, in fact, a moron.

      Yes, the curves might be centered on different places for different (artificially created) subsets of the population of humans, but that doesn't make a teeny bit of difference as to what any particular (say) one armed hermaphroditic eskimo might be capable of doing professionally.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    15. Re:Underrepresentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, "gowen", how is a posting under a pseudonym any less cowardly than posting anonymously?

    16. Re:Underrepresentation? by Bunji+X · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think he meant "Ewok".

      Wearing an Ewok is simple: Fry it with a laser, make clothes of the fur.

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    17. Re:Underrepresentation? by gowen · · Score: 1

      G. Owen. That is my name. See the email address gwowen, G. W. Owen is me too. See the URL, gazowen, well Gaz Owen, thats my name too.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    18. Re:Underrepresentation? by schon · · Score: 1

      Unless you believe that only white males are genetically predisposed to becoming capable engineers, in which case, well ... you're a moron.

      No, if you believe that the only reason that people have different abilities is because of culture, then you're a moron.

      If you think (as you seem to) that the only reason that men are (generally) physically larger and stronger than women is culture, you're a moron.

      Why are men larger and stronger? Hormones (typically testosterone.) The effects of testosterone on muscle tissue and general physique have long been known - and we're beginning to discover that it affects the brain too. Agression (one of the easiest metrics) is higher when you have higher levels of testosterone.

      You're going to completely discard the notion that it might affect the brain in other ways too?

      As someone else pointed out, read "Brain Sex". It shows that there are distinct differences (and hence abilities) of people with different hormone levels. People with high levels of male hormones are better with spacial reasoning, and people with high levels of female hormones are better at communication.

      This isn't an effect of culture, it's an effect of biology - and we're still discovering more.

    19. Re:Underrepresentation? by XScB · · Score: 1

      So you're the person on slashdot who uses his own name as a handle!

      I knew there was at least one.

  4. The best part of that show by stevens · · Score: 4, Funny

    was Cathy rogers. Rrowr!

    1. Re:The best part of that show by Void_of_light · · Score: 1

      The new chick (at least in the us version) is named Lisa Rogers anyone know if she is a relation to Cathy or if its just a coincidence?

    2. Re:The best part of that show by nigelc · · Score: 1

      No, she's not related to Cathy (all hail Cathy).
      Lisa -- note that the show is called "Scrapheap Challenge" in the UK.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
    3. Re:The best part of that show by Jbrecken · · Score: 1

      The new chick (at least in the us version) is named Lisa Rogers anyone know if she is a relation to Cathy or if its just a coincidence?

      She's on the UK version; the new chick on the US version is Karyn Bryant.

      It's just a coincidence.

    4. Re:The best part of that show by !splut · · Score: 1

      Rrowr is right!

      But aside from her roles as producer, host, and hottie, did you know she was in a band called Marine Research?

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    5. Re:The best part of that show by Pope · · Score: 1

      Cathy was also in the band Heavenly. If you go a Google image search you can find a few pics of her playing keyboards and singing backup.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  5. Translation: by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    The other people caught on, and we need some new people to come in and clean up this junkyard.

    1. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose an entire group of people are damned to be janitors forever because their mommy didn't (or couldn't) buy them a TRS-80 when they were a kid.....

      you sir, are a fucking moron.

    2. Re:Translation: by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      You sir, are an overreacting blowhard. Go take a goddamn smoke break, and for the record, I never had a TRS-80. It sounds like you didn't either. Why so tense about it?

    3. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because I'm ashamed to be a white guy when I hear comments like that made. There are some very disadvantaged people in the world that won't EVER get to go to an engineering school and will never have skills required for Junk Yard Wars. Insinuating that JYW wants ethnic diversity this season so they can "clean up the junkyard" is just stupid. Yes, I do need a smokebreak. Yes, I am a little touchy. The day that white people stop giving minorities reasons to hate us is the day I stop smoking and freaking out in general.

    4. Re:Translation: by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      I think you are taking my remark out of context. Why aren't you up in arms over the fact that JYW is now just starting to want minorities and handi-capable people?

      That's all beside the point. JYW is going to have new people on. My comment implied that the previous contestants figured out the 'real' reason for the show. Whether or not the new people are minorities or not means nothing in the context of my remark. Yes, it could be inferred that I'm some anti-minority guy since minorities were mentioned in the story I replied too, but if there were no minorities and ethnic diversity mentioned, would that say I am making fun of white people? Who knows. I try and treat everyone the same. No slight was intended.

  6. Never Fails by jetkust · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is is just me, or does anyone else find it strange that the teams always finish on time. Some editing tricks perhaps?

  7. Great show but wrong place to solicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you know the Slashdot audience?
    Overweight all-talk do-nothing airchair warriors.
    If you had some sort of porn watching or complaining challenge - then this would be the place.

    1. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Malc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If it were a case of scavenging the SourceForge junkyard for libraries, we might stand a chance of winning a virtual Junkyard War/Scrapheap Challenge. The pre-requisites would include coding/integration not welding ability.

    2. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by shivianzealot · · Score: 2, Funny

      As a skinny pale all-talk-do-nothing airchair warrior, I am deeply offended! Stereotypes like this are hurtful and counter productive but... hmmm... one more sentance and I might be doing something.

      /me crawls back into his seat

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    3. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you know the Slashdot audience?
      Overweight all-talk do-nothing airchair warriors.
      If you had some sort of porn watching or complaining challenge - then this would be the place.


      Are you suggesting -- PornYard Wars? What a great idea! Take two teams, make them construct a video camera and film the best porn movie, all in 10 hours. The hosts will, of course, stack the junkyard with cheesy second-rate jazz musicians for the background tracks. They also might place creative costumes in inconspicuous places -- skimpy bikinis, schoolgirl uniforms, nurses uniforms, tennis outfits, etc.

      The male/female ratio would definitely need to improve for this show to take off, though. :-)

    4. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Halvard · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's me. 5'9" ex-military, 5% body fat, 150#, SCA fighting, 20 mile a week running, 12 hour a day working, straight-and-cohabitating, almost 40, entrepreneur with computer support and ISP operations on both coasts, do-nothing armchair warrior. I don't believe I'm the exception. Not the rule, but not the exception.

    5. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shove it up your tight, muscled ex-marine ass, fag.

    6. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by operagost · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be OT, but I don't get your sig. What does this kid have to do with gun control? Unless you were AGAINST gun control, specifically so you could put this kid out his misery quickly.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overweight all-talk do-nothing armchair warriors.

      I want you to know, I take great exception to that. Perpetuating these stereotypes of technical people is simply not called for. We are not all "armchair warriors", many of us are... wait, did you say air chair? Cool. Are they comfortable? How about a URL? Where can I order one online? This is important, these are things we need to know.

    8. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by joediga · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. 6'3", 205#, Kickboxing & bodybuilding enthusiast when I have time off from writing code. C++ is where it's at.

      --
      -- ignoring AC's since... well, always --
    9. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm 6'3", 270 lbs of muscle, and I'm a welder.

      I don't read or program computer code, but I like jerking off to porn and reading techy news at slashdot. It makes me feel smart.

      Acting smart gets me laid.

    10. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So when you guys are done bragging about the size of your dicks and finish circle-jerking each other, let us know. Believe me, it's pretty safe to say you two homos ARE the exception.

    11. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by MonopolyNews · · Score: 1

      considering the moderation on your post, add, "...with a self depracating sense of humor"

      --

      Slashdot Journal on Monopoly News
    12. Re:Great show but wrong place to solicit by joediga · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Mr. SmallDick is jealous. (and possibly getting turned on...)

      --
      -- ignoring AC's since... well, always --
  8. Re:Cathy rogers! by kperrier · · Score: 1

    Too bad she no longer hosts the show.

    Kent

  9. Underrepresented.. by Nix0n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How, exactly? Underrepresented relative to their proportions in the general population, or relative to their proportions with inclination/education in mechanical engineering? If the former, they are idiots. If the latter, good for them. Applying one set of demographic standards to another domain entiely is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Underrepresented.. by gowen · · Score: 1
      inclination/education in mechanical engineering
      Inclination to mechanical engineering is cultural, and JW are trying to help overcome those cultural biases. I say, more power to them.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Underrepresented.. by extra88 · · Score: 1

      The domain is not "mechanical engineering" it's "television." Junkyard Wars has too many white guys for the televsion domain. As long as the contestants have sufficient skills, I'm happy they're looking to mix things up a bit more in other respects.

    3. Re:Underrepresented.. by schon · · Score: 1

      Inclination to mechanical engineering is cultural

      Proof please?

    4. Re:Underrepresented.. by gowen · · Score: 1

      Because if it was genetic, order(1) changes in to the proportion of women becoming engineers could only take place on evolutionary timescales. i.e. the 5 or 6 fold increase of the last 20 years simply couldn't have happened.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  10. i wanna see the slashdot squad... by TechnoVooDooDaddy · · Score: 5, Funny

    and see them fail miserably because they wasted 6 hours arguing over whether to use the MIG/MAG or TIG welding torch, or spending all the time trying to get linux to boot on their handheld so they can run some simulation calculations....

    1. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by Some+Bitch · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget the part where 'Informative' kicks 'Interesting' in the balls after 'Troll' starts an argument over whether to license it under BSD or GPL.

    2. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1

      If the editors had only bothered to watch last week's show, they would have noticed that the Bathtub Hovercraft is a dupe.

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    3. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But when the project is finished, do we call it "crap" or "GNU/crap"

    4. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      And that guy that goes into that little room with the camera in the back, gets all serious, and goes "Did you hear? Stephen King is dead at age..."

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    5. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

      Very true.

      Of course when they do fail, it'd all be blamed on

      1. Bill Gates (which might be valid but..)
      2. Pres. Bush
      3. Those damn Evolutionists...
      4. RIAA
      5. MPAA

    6. Re:i wanna see the slashdot squad... by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1

      But when the project is finished, do we call it "crap" or "GNU/crap"

      The name's probably irrelevant, in true /. style the minute any discussion over it's relative merits was started on the forums the hordes would rush in with cries of 'First post', 'M$ $ux my ass' and 'IANAL and I'm about to prove it by talking bollocks for 3 pages' until 10 seconds later the server explodes in a rain of molten metal :)

  11. Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...and not afraid of getting their hands dirty..."

    "...as well as people with physical disabilities..."

    What about people with no hands?

    1. Re:Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, on second thoughts I guess they would really have worries about getting their hands dirty.

    2. Re:Contradiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... you insensitive clod.

  12. This IS slashdot... by JohnA · · Score: 5, Funny
    this year we are looking for individual applicants who are skilled at putting together sophisticated machinery and not afraid of getting their hands dirty.

    Hands dirty? The poster does realize that this is slashdot, right?

    Perhaps he ment to post that they were looking for someone to bitch on the sidelines in the upcoming season...

    1. Re:This IS slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he ment to post that they were looking for someone to bitch on the sidelines in the upcoming season...

      I think you'll find that the spelling is "meant", I mean for the love of Jehovah get something right will ya?

      And apart from the bitching what else is the typical /. person going to be good at? Pointing out that the car(again?) needs some kind of di-lithium crystal to make it go VROOM-VROOM, then cackling madly at their own goddamn lack of wit?

    2. Re:This IS slashdot... by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

      Hands dirty? The poster does realize that this is slashdot, right?

      If you live in a dark closet among empty $carbonateddrink cans, discarded snack bags, and mold which threatens to consume your hardware if you weren't diligent keeping it at bay with your soldering iron - like the rest of us - your hands are probably far from clean most of the time.

      Hmmm... I bet I could have gotten more karma from a masturbation joke. Oh well.

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    3. Re:This IS slashdot... by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Oh, hands get dirty around here alright. Except it's usually bodily fluids, not grease.

    4. Re:This IS slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to try the posh wank then, do it with a condom on, no more unnessary washing up afterwards, or get someone to lick your fingers clean.

  13. Under representation? by jclendenan · · Score: 1

    I find the most under represented groups are those of students (post-secondary ones). What's up with that? Do they thing we've not got the skills to build things?

    1. Re:Under representation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think you're under-represented, then apply. See if you really do have the skills.

  14. TV Magic! by Angram · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've always thought about that myself. They've always 'got a long way to go' with 45 minutes left, and just finish the last nail at the buzzer. A little too Hollywood in the timing, and it's consistant with every team every time.

    --

    GL
    1. Re:TV Magic! by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Informative

      You don't watch the show much...

      A lot of teams finish with spare time on their hands... not a lot of spare time, but I've seen at least 30 minutes before. They usually lose.

      The majority do finish in the "nick of time"... or don't actually finish at all and are welding/constructing during the hour of tinker time on competition day.

      A rather large number of the machines don't work at all, or fail during the tests... I wonder if they'll ever do hydroplanes again since they've yet to have a single one work out of two competitions (or maybe more... don't recall - most of them floated and moved, but none actually hydroplaned).

      Read the forums though... the ones where the teams actually participate in them. There isn't any behind the scenes help in construction. Sorry to burst your cynical bubble.

    2. Re:TV Magic! by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They've always 'got a long way to go' with 45 minutes left, and just finish the last nail at the buzzer.
      Of course they hit the last nail at the buzzer -- they aren't allowed to hit any more nails after the buzzer.
      Looking for your keys? They always seem to be in the last place you look. That's because you stop looking for them when you find them.
    3. Re:TV Magic! by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I don't think its's staged. I think it's an affect of the approaching deadline.

      After nine hours the team has probably done all of the planning they need in order to build their machine. The impending deadline forces them to stop their 'is this the best way to do things' discussions and actually turn out a product.

    4. Re:TV Magic! by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      A rather large number of the machines don't work at all, or fail during the tests... I wonder if they'll ever do hydroplanes again since they've yet to have a single one work out of two competitions (or maybe more... don't recall - most of them floated and moved, but none actually hydroplaned).

      I forget which team it was (I think it was the Mules or something... forget their full name) but I was really disappointed when their motor died in the hydroplane competition because their machine was really cool... built from the helicopter blades and stuff, and I really really wanted to see it go and win... they were an awesome team.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    5. Re:TV Magic! by Emil+S+Hansen · · Score: 1

      Ohh, it was the forums that convinced/fooled you?

      You are soooo naive! ;-}

      --
      Will work for bandwidth!
    6. Re:TV Magic! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, have you seen my keys? 'Cuz I already looked in the last place I looked, and they weren't there.

      For real. I need my keys. What'd you do with them? This isn't funny anymore...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:TV Magic! by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 1

      They're still very hollywood. Take a look at the camera angles in the competition between the bridge vehicles. They never show them next to eachother. I think it would be safe to assume that the mothers of invention got whipped, but their camera and announcers made it seem they were neck and neck the whole time. Or their camera men were so bad they couldn't get a shot of them next to eachother.

    8. Re:TV Magic! by mcdade · · Score: 1

      i thought there was one show where a team build a hydroplane (not the object of the comp, i think it was the river raft episode) where they used a jetski engine and build a wing to plane up the boat. the front planed (though they had to tie some stuff down cause the first time it didn't work to well) but they pretty much got the front end out of the water, the boat and the driver were to heavy for the entire thing to plane, poor little jetski engine. I think they aslo blew out their tranny in the same show.

      -b

    9. Re:TV Magic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I'm suspicious of is the way
      teams always pick decidedly different
      approaches for certain challenges. I.e.,
      dirigible vs. model airplane for the RPV bomb-dropping,or hydraulic claw vs. battering ram for the wrecking machine. Might be some
      producer prodding there.

    10. Re:TV Magic! by wawadave · · Score: 1

      quote"The world is run by idiots because they're more efficient than hamsters" this is really because theres just not enough hamsters to go around lol.

  15. Wow, just like Mad Max by georgeha · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I can contact the legless mechanic and Tina Turner, I've got myself a team!

    1. Re:Wow, just like Mad Max by scottcha+4 · · Score: 0

      And don't forget the little guy and his mentally challenged friend.

      --
      Sanity is overrated...Being CRAZY is much more fun!!!
    2. Re:Wow, just like Mad Max by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Master Blaster.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
  16. i wish.... by MadLibs · · Score: 1

    this is one of the few times ive wished i was more mechanically inclined, as a chica. i am SO in love with that show, and other than reception, it would be one of the few reasons i would get cable. i am often incredulous at what they come up with. not to mention, they seem like they have so much fun --- winning or losing. maybe i can pick up a "dummies guide to 'engineering, fabrication and a good mechanical 'know how'". ah well. whats a girl to do??

    1. Re:i wish.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On one of the shows one of the team's welder said something like "I've never really done this before I just said I could to get on the show"

      So wing it see if you can get on the show.

    2. Re:i wish.... by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Naw... little engeneering knowledge is needed... what you need to know is how visualise what you're making, and think about what you could use to build it... it's improvising, not structured design. The experts help a lot in doing the designing.

      For the actual skills, you're best off getting your hands on a book on welding (an older one from the 60's - 70's are great, they're more often written for the lay person/DIY'er, even if they mainly teach you arc welding... little used on the show, but the knowledge can be transfered to other types of welding), something on car engines (again older is good, most of the engines used are older, with less electronics to fail... getting a book on newer vehicles maybe a good idea too, so you can put your skills you use fixing your vehicle, or your friends).

      Beyond that, practice! Learn how to weld, not just text book, but do it... same with dealing with motors... learn the stuff... apply it.

      Honestly though, being a woman doesn't limit you in any way... the only limits that I can see are based on your physical limitations (most women I've arn't extreamly muscular, but if you actually do as much of the physical labor as you can, you'll develop muscles... not pretty, show off type muscles, but effective ones, even if they're not as prominant... which is the best kind of muscles to have, IMO)

      Also... learn about the safty rules with whatever equipment you're using... being blinded by a arc flash is not a fun thing.

  17. Trends by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Einstein said something like "I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones."

    With the actual problem in Middle East (and possible consequences) maybe the next war will be really a Junkyard war.

    1. Re:Trends by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      If only there was a [+1 Insightful but Offtopic]...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    2. Re:Trends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possible consequences like a 'Palestinian Homeland' that's a radioactive waste? And a Persian Gulf that's a chemical warfare wasteland?

      All I can say is we'll have to beef up our borders to keep out the people who didn't have the self-restraint to not shit in their own beds.

  18. Correct me if I'm wrong.. by cioxx · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..but wouldn't this be more suited for [H]ardOCP folk? Slashdot crowd's needs are different. Hear me out.

    Create a gameshow called IT Storage Wars.

    Premise: Nerds will be unleashed upon ridiculously aged hardware with a copy of putty.exe, 5 1/5 floppy disc, Linux distribution on a USB-pen, and a wrench to build enterprise-level application servers complete with clustering and a backend database.

    I think this could be a winning combination.

    1. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It already exists. It's called my job. Except I don't get no fancy USB-pen.

    2. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Greedo · · Score: 1, Funny

      You can be the next contestant on Beowulf Challenge.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    3. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      And the Hax0r script kiddy in the backgroud trying to mess you up!

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    4. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by bookroach · · Score: 1

      I feel you man, I really do. All to often am I scrapping old pc's for backup and development server parts.

      --
      GTA3 is like the Sims to me - MC Hawking
    5. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by On+Lawn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree. Slashdot has many many members, and probably very few know how to do real machining and welding. Heck, a small percentage of your hot-rod modders knows those things. Add the word quality, and of those that can, you've shot off another 90-5%.

      But in that 90% are people with real can-do attitude, that has been my favorite part of watching junkyard wars. Monster Garage, on the other hand has pretty well trained machinists. But it makes the show less entertaining, and less accessible for me the lay-viewer. In fact, what they do is so over my head the producers never really show me how they are doing it.

      Its not that these qualities are mutually exclusive. But watching someone show resourcefulness in making make-shift stuff is more along my line of understanding then someone that simply knows how to fabricate it anyway.

      -----------------

      OnRoad: Racing Game Subcultures.

    6. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Jesterr · · Score: 1

      You just described my job!

      Only I don't get the USB-pen, and they wanted it yesterday!

    7. Re:Correct me if I'm wrong.. by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Why are a bunch of linux geeks going to need "PuTTY: a free Win32 telnet/ssh client?"

      --
      Banaaaana!
  19. Wow by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is probably going to become the first time in history that a snail-mail box is going to feel the wrath of the Slashdot Effect.

    And yes, I'll be applying. Heh.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Wow by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      no, I think our good friend Alan Ralsky holds that title.

      I just hope that he's still getting snail mail spam.

    2. Re:Wow by shivianzealot · · Score: 1

      This is probably going to become the first time in history that a snail-mail box is going to feel the wrath of the Slashdot Effect.

      /me quits writing his xserve in a mailbox mod submission and just sulks.

      --

      Bored with karma, be a fan/freak

    3. Re:Wow by broken.data · · Score: 1

      And this weeks challenge: Build a machine that can deliver this mail! Bonus ponts are awarded if you can open it along the way and filter the spam.

  20. Wonder if they will... by boaworm · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... make the competition more suitable to the ./ crowd.

    *Mental Picture*

    Ok, guys.. You got 10 hours to build a PC that will run Quake2 in 60 FPS or more. Good luck !

    --
    Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
    Aristotele
    1. Re:Wonder if they will... by Etrigan_696 · · Score: 1

      60 fps on Q2 - that would be hard with decent hardware. At least you didn't say Unreal...

      And to make it more suitable to this crowd, the challenges would be to build a computer out of crap in the yard in ten hours, then use it to get on slashdot, and the team that makes the most SOVIET RUSSIA, Natalie Portman/grits in pants, "is dead", and FP b1tc#3z! 3y3 0\/\/n3rz J00! posts in two hours wins.

    2. Re:Wonder if they will... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see something more along the lines of: start with a big room filled with computers that don't work. First build a working computer. Load a given OS. Get presented with some obscure language compiler/interpretter. Get on the net, learn the language, write some weird program, all in 10 hours. Drivers would probably present a problem, and obviously the program couldn't be incredibly complex due to time constraints.

  21. Not trying ot be mean... by spammeister · · Score: 1, Funny

    But dohn't they contradict the statement of having "diasbled people" and people with "good skills" on the same show. I mean the show is pretty funny now, but have a bunch of one armed people with an IQ of 50 will just make it a "sad funny". I have nothing against stupid people, some of my best friends are stupid! Obviously the show cheats enough as it is to magiclaly get this contraptions to work, but going too far will just turn it into a fantasy show.

    On an off-tanget note, I wonder if they will have a show like that 100 years from now. "On the next episode in 5D vision Refuse Pile Conflicts (politically corret), our two teams (made up of humnas and robitic celebrities) try to construct a particle accelerator and see which team can extract the most Uranium 238 in an hour to make fuel for a mass driver."

    --
    I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
    1. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by gowen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      But dohn't they contradict the statement of having "diasbled people" and people with "good skills" on the same show
      Yeah! They don't want disabled guys like that Stephen Hawking moron on, lowering the intellectual tone...
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The you ought to get out of your narrow little life and meet some disabled people.

      There are disabled people who are university professors (on merit, not on quotas), and disabled people who climb mountains and build cars.

      Categorising everyone whose abilities don't fit into your narrow preception of 'normal' as both 'stupid' and 'unskilled' is both insulting and ill-informed.

    3. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by gorilla · · Score: 1

      In my experience disabled people generally have better skills than average. They work very hard to overcome their limitations and succeed. And of course, physically disabled people have exactly the same range of IQ as non-disabled people.

    4. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obviously the show cheats enough as it is to magiclaly get this contraptions to work

      The UK version (Scrapheap Challenge) doesn't always have working machines. In the last series a car tossing trebuchet collapsed in spectacular fashion on the first attempt to hurl a Mini through the air. It is also common to see teams sitting, in true British stereotype fashion, wth a cup of tea at the end of the building time, having finished half an hour early.

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    5. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by mattreilly · · Score: 1, Funny

      I have nothing against stupid people, some of my best friends are stupid!

      Birds of a feather...

    6. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by dlbowm · · Score: 1

      There are different kinds of disabilities. Mental and physical. The web site doesn't differentiate between them, so the original posters statement, while crude, was not off-base.

    7. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Funny

      I want to see Dr. Hawking open a jammed car door with a pickaxe.

      There do exist some disabilities which preclude some people from doing some activities. For instance, I am not well suited to bearing children, since I'm male.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by gowen · · Score: 1

      But you only need a couple of people who can smash stuff up, like you only need one skilled welder...

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    9. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      That was a great (but tragic) episode. Two ten hour days of work ending in disaster. If only they had left the line (chain? cable?) attached to the Mini taut.

      For anyone who missed it, one team built a > 4 story tall trebuchet (the other build a elastic powered ballista) and left the Mini directly under the axis. The trebuchet arm got a fair bit of momentum up before all the slack was taken out of the line connecting the trowing arm to the mini. The Mini did move, but hardly left the ground, and was flung the wrong way. The trebuchet turned back into a pile of rubble.

      Quite the disappointment.

    10. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as your post proves, there are able-bodied people that are both 'stupid' and 'unskilled'.

    11. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, i'd be happy just to see him open a jar of jam...

    12. Re:Not trying ot be mean... by t0ny · · Score: 1
      since I'm male

      well, thats close enough to be true

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  22. Re:Never Fails by MadLibs · · Score: 1
    well they "finish" ... but the finished product doesnt always....uhm...work.

    ive heard girls talk about their boyfriends like this....

  23. This is scrapheap challenge right? by phrantic · · Score: 1

    I've have watched this for ages on Discovery. The latest series seems to consists of exclusively of US teams, although it appears still to be set in the UK (UK number plates on the scrapped cars etc). In addition to shipping the teams in they also appear to ship cars in, like Oldsmobile and the like. The challenges are getting a bit repetitive too, last night (I live in Holland) we had the "build a old fashioned diving bell and get some treasure off the bottom of the pool". Been there done that.

    If they are going to repeat these things can we have repeats of the ones that involve building guns and siege weapons, you can never have enough of that.

    --
    --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  24. Re:Wow .. ironic isnt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moron

  25. Come on now by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a show that does some great engineering out of nothing. But their application process is to download a word document, fill it out, print it out and send it via snail mail to the studio.

    Can't they come up with a better solution then this? At the very least make the application an interactive PDF and at most make it a Web Form.

    But because they are using word they have to post an e-mail address stating that if you can not open word to e-mail someone about it.

    Not very technically saavy they seem.

    1. Re:Come on now by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      Not very technically saavy they seem

      Talk like Yoda you do much?

      Seems to me they have to raise the bar a little bit for these entries, else they'll be bombarded. Granted, they're soliciting, but there's a difference between holding your cattle call at 8:00am on a Thursday in a SoHo loft and Noon on a Saturday in Central Park. You'd be surprised at how many time-wasting wannabes and poseurs the simple requirement of licking a stamp and dropping an envelope into a box eliminates.

    2. Re:Come on now by KMAPSRULE · · Score: 1

      "at most make it a Web Form."

      They won't cause They don't want to pay NCR for it ;)

      --

      --Im an oven mitt, not an engineer! (SLArbys Radio Commercial)
    3. Re:Come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Here is the application in plain text format:
      JUNKYARD WARS 2003 APPLICATION FORM
      Welcome future Junkyard Warriors!

      Please fill in all of the fields below. When complete, please print out a copy of your completed application. Mail your application, a current photo, and your application video to the address at the bottom. Good luck!

      Personal Information:
      Use the "tab" key on your keyboard to move between fields.
      Name:
      Nickname:
      Street Address:
      Apt.:
      City:
      State or Province:
      Zip Code:
      Country:
      Home Phone:
      Work Phone:
      Cell Phone:
      Fax:
      e-mail:
      Occupation:
      Age years
      Date of Birth 19 Height feetinches Weight lbs Gender Skills

      Please rank yourself in the following areas:

      No Experience Novice Experienced Expert
      Welding
      Metal Cutting
      Engines
      Electrics
      Woodwork
      General Mechanics

      Tell us something amazing about yourself.

      What are your hobbies and interests?

      Who is your favorite team member, judge, or expert from any past episode of Junkyard Wars and why?

      What would be your ultimate challenge on Junkyard Wars?

      Video

      Please record a video no longer than 5 minutes. (Videos must be submitted as VHS, VHS-c, or mini-DV. Please do not send in Hi-8 as we cannot view it)

      In your video, please include the following:

      1)Your name, your age, where you live, and your occupation.
      2)Tell us about / demonstrate your favorite machine or tool and help us understand why you love it.
      3)Tell us about an incident on junkyard wars you have particularly loved or loathed and why?
      4)What makes you a Junkyard superstar?
      5)You have one minute to impress us with your mechanical, engineering or bodging skills. Go!

      Please label both your video and your application very clearly in case they get separated. We would suggest name and phone number on both at the very least.

      When complete, please print your application and mail it along with the video and photo to:

      Junkyard Wars Applications
      3940 Laurel Canyon Blvd. #107
      Studio City, CA 91604
      USA

      Good Luck and best wishes from the Junkyard Wars applications team! We will endeavor to notify you either way once we have received and viewed all the applications.

      Deadline
      APPLICATIONS MUST BE POSTMARKED BY FEBRUARY 28th 2003

    4. Re:Come on now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap. The slashdot crowd is more the Red Hat linux software types than the Red Neck mechanics types.

  26. Cathy Rogers and Bobo by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if Cathy Rogers liked my Junkyard Wars entry tape from a couple of years ago. Bobo hates cans. And sometimes garlic cloves, too.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Cathy Rogers and Bobo by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      bookmarked for later

  27. I fowarded this to my dad by AssFace · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope he applies for it - this is the sort of thing he would love.

    when he was a professor, his students hated him because he made them think (imagine that) and he frequently gave them assignments that were much like this show (the one I recall best was they were given a remote control car, assorted kitchen appliances, tin foil, wood, tennis balls, a 286, and some other stuff and were supposed to make a robot that would roam about a gym and retrieve various objects that were placed there. nobody completed the assignment and most didn't even try)

    I told him about this show once and he was quite excited - had never seen it - I don't think he watches tv. he wanted me to tape it for him, which to me is like asking me to carve it out of stone for him - I don't even own a VCR.
    Now I see that they sell VHS tapes of the show, so I guess now I know a present for him.

    I agree with another poster on here that my fav part of the show was the cute brit host girl that is now on that show with Henry Rollins.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:I fowarded this to my dad by QuackQuack · · Score: 1

      when he was a professor, his students hated him because he made them think (imagine that) and he frequently gave them assignments that were much like this show (the one I recall best was they were given a remote control car, assorted kitchen appliances, tin foil, wood, tennis balls, a 286, and some other stuff and were supposed to make a robot that would roam about a gym and retrieve various objects that were placed there. nobody completed the assignment and most didn't even try)

      That IS evil. What kind of class was this for? Did the students really posess the knowledge and skills needed to complete the project? How much time were they given? I don't think a semester is enough unless it's the only class they were taking. Was it a team project or individual?

      I don't even think the average RC car could transport a 286 and other accessories (like where's the software, on a 5.25" disk?)

      Making people think is one thing (IE, accurately describing how such a robot could be built in detail), but actually pulling this project off takes a wide range of skills and experiences and drive that the average student just doesn't have. Less experience means more trial and error.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to the terms of my sig license.
    2. Re:I fowarded this to my dad by AssFace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They had the whole semester and was team based. The teams could be as big or as small as they wanted them, just had to be of people from that class (not just that time-slot, just that class).

      The grade wasn't based on successful completion, but about how they approached the problem - I don't think he expected anyone to actually finish it - but what disappointed him was that nobody even tried.
      For that project, just to show them it *could* be done with what he gave them, he did one by himeself about halfway through the semester and walked them through it showing them the thinking process (this was an advanced class, not a 101).
      Even after all of that, many didn't even bother with an attempt at it.
      His version used infrared sensors, a webcam, a few servos, kitchen tongs, and the remote controlled car - with the 286 motherboard connected to that back. It was setup to run a loop (in forth) that would scan the sensors, figure out what was around, move the steering servos accordingly, and then move forward or backward by running the motors for a fixed amount of time. Then it would check the sensors again and repeat.
      IMO it was and is a shitty school and he deserved to be somewhere better.

      He had a few students that liked him and worked well with him and they went on towards their PhDs at CalTech, Princeton, and MIT. The rest just complained to the deans that he didn't do cookbook labs (he was an analytical chem professor).
      He worked with Bob Ballard and designed his own JASON project on site (via the web - which was just getting big (1995) he setup a remote controlled car that drove over a plexiglass platform which had holes in it (and the car had a webcam mounted on it, pointing down throught he plexi). Under that plexiglass, about 5 inches down, were common household objects spread out on a table - and then that entire deal (under the plexiglass) was covered in sand.
      From the web page, you could log in and gain control of the vehicle for a time limit (I think 1 min) and then you could move it around - press the right button, the page would submit and you would move a unit right. You would see on screen what the car "saw" through its camera. Then you could press the "blow" button (forget what it was called) and it activated a compressed air hose on the vehicle that would blow the sand away that was under the car/plexi.
      The desired result was that you could go in and uncover part of the buried scene - much in the way that Ballard works when he goes on his dives (Bob Ballard is the man that discovered the wreck of the Titanic).
      This project brought much attention to the college and allowed many elementary schools to compete against each other and chat via the web page - there was additional content that allowed them more to learn about the process.
      My dad also worked for NASA in the summers and represented the school...

      But, because of all that he did and the fact that his students felt he didn't do enough cookbook labs, he didn't get tenure.
      He left, they shut down the JASON project that was there, and he stopped working with NASA.

      Then he moved to Biotech and made 5x his previous salary the first year.

      After 5 or so years with that, he got laid off and he travelled Canada living out of his car and writing two books for a year.

      Not sure what he is up to now - last I talked to him he was at a conference in LA that discusses biotech automation and he was talking with a friend out there about a job.

      I have a lot of respect for him, but then, I'm biased :)

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    3. Re:I fowarded this to my dad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he expects YOU to build a VCR out of discarded kitchen junk, a 286 and some wire! ;-)

      Artaxerxes

    4. Re:I fowarded this to my dad by AssFace · · Score: 1

      LMAO
      probably :)

      we had a ton of random broken things around my house growing up. all the lights in each room were on motion detectors, we had like 18 TVs, 2 microwaves, and like 15 remote controlled cars. We had I think 10 assorted 8088 or 286s in our place at one point, and one whole room of the house was literally full from floor to ceiling with boxes of Nalgene bottles.

      He would get a lot of stuff donated to him that nobody else wanted, and then he would eventually try to figure out what to do with it.

      The main issue was that nothing really looked all that "done" - it would work most of the time, but not always, and it tended to have lots of wires hanging out of it.
      Our microwave door wasn't always aligned right, so when you used it, you had to hold a detector to know how close/far away to stand from it.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  28. Pedantic explanation of Scrapheap/Junkyard by threeturn · · Score: 5, Informative
    To clarify all this:
    There are basically two programmes:
    • Scrapheap Challenge (mostly UK teams made for UK TV), and
    • Junkyard Wars (mostly US teams made for US TV)

    Just to confuse things though, when Discovery Channel in Europe shows the programmes the use Scrapheap Challenge as the title regardless of which version the programme originally came from.

    Both SHC and JW are filmed in the same place. Last series this was in the US. This series its moved back to the UK. As you say, "foreign" rubbish is imported if necessary to make people feel at home.

    Am I the saddest man on /. for knowing all this?

    1. Re:Pedantic explanation of Scrapheap/Junkyard by idontgno · · Score: 3, Informative
      Just to confuse things though, when Discovery Channel in Europe shows the programmes the use Scrapheap Challenge as the title regardless of which version the programme originally came from.

      And, conversely, it's all "Junkyard Wars" on the US version of Discovery Channel, regardless of the original program.

      Am I the saddest man on /. for knowing all this?

      No, just a true /.er.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Pedantic explanation of Scrapheap/Junkyard by phrantic · · Score: 1

      The best episode (apart from the guns etc) was the one where they built the hover crafts.

      One of the guys built a propellor out of a solid piece of wood,

      or in /. terms Will Smith used an Apple Mac to crash that big space craft in Independance day.

      --
      --My sig is bigger than your sig--
  29. Re:Wow .. ironic isnt it by objekt · · Score: 1, Funny

    No, the irony is that you ended up in the wrong thread.

    I guess you do need a better back button after all.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  30. Why So Few Gay Engineers? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those groups are "underrepresented" among engineers!

    Yeah, tell me about it. In my engineering classes, out of about 300 students, we only had two gay guys. Two! And they were both in aerospace engineering.

    It was really annoying, because anytime I needed fashion advice, I had to walk all the way to the arts buildings on the other end of campus and start asking random people in the hallways.

    In my experience, there are only two kinds of people who can drink harder than engineers: mariners and gay people. I think it would be utterly terrifying to meet a gay marine engineer.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 3, Funny
      In my experience, there are only two kinds of people who can drink harder than engineers: mariners and gay people. I think it would be utterly terrifying to meet a gay marine engineer.
      Depends who's buying the drinks.
      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    2. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by flikx · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? The entire steel industry is gay. Aerospace too, and the railroads.

      (Sorry, couldn't help myself.) Besides, the real gayness is found in the Electrical Engineering department.

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    3. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jethuth Chrith

    4. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, the real gayness is found in the Electrical Engineering department.

      Really? I'd love to find some gay engineers, especially if they're cute. Have photos to exchange.

      yiddophile AT yahoo DOT com

      (Oh yeah as the e-mail address suggests, I like gay Jews, too.)

    5. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by kryzx · · Score: 3, Funny

      Russians definitely have to be in the running here. Now, a gay Russian marine engineer - that would be something.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
    6. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Interestingly the reverse is true for transgendered/transsexual people. There is a high incidence of both in mechanical, electrical and electronic engineering as well as computing and the sciences. Games is another area where there is a higher than average proportion.

      There's been at least one on the UK version of the show.

    7. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by jayspec462 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be utterly terrifying to meet a gay marine engineer. Hello, sailor!

      --
      $comment =~ s/($verb)\s+($noun)/IN SOVIET RUSSIA, $2 $1s YOU!/g;
    8. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by arose · · Score: 1

      Actully russians are surprised how much Latvians can drink...

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    9. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      I went to college with a gay newfie who was studying electronics engineering. Skip the russians ... newfies can drink more than any human I've ever seen. Their 'pre-drinking' was a 24, then it was time to hit the hard stuff ..

      AND they'd make it to class the next day.

      inconceivable!

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    10. Re:Why So Few Gay Engineers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my friends forwarded your comment to me because I'm gay, I drive ships in the Navy, and I'm an engineer. And let me tell you, my friend, your assessment was correct. My Viking ancestors would be proud. As soon as I'm no longer imprisoned by "Don't ask, don't tell, don't move" I'll get in touch with you. First round is on me! BTW, I'm not actually cowardly, I'd just like to hang on to my job. Pretty ridiculous state of affairs, huh? I'm sure this post would be very prejudicial to good discipline.

  31. Pet Peeve #1 by chrysrobyn · · Score: 3, Funny

    please log onto our website

    I tried, but I couldn't find the blank for my userid and password. Perhaps your site is broken.

  32. sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    That forced diversity is absurd as taking a white male in Britain and force him to hang out with a French white male. We would never do this because they are both the same color, and so then it's ok that they don't like eachother. Diversity at my company is a crock, and when people talk about why there aren't many female engineers. I can tell you why. my first year of school at kettering, a private engineering school in Michigan, where I got my undergrad B.S. 35% of the girls dropped out before the first semester ended. They had every advantage, garanteed scholarships just for being girls at a engineering school and buy my Junior year, out of the 79 girls that started when i was a freshman 15 were left. and even less were sitting up there with me when I graduated. So I don't know what the reason is. But something happens and it's not all societal.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:sometimes I think to myself by gowen · · Score: 1
      my first year of school at kettering, a private engineering school in Michigan, where I got my undergrad B.S. 35% of the girls dropped out before the first semester ended ... But something happens and it's not all societal.
      What makes you think thats not societal? It could be peer pressure, parental pressure ("not a suitable job for a lady"), a misogynistic atmosphere, any of hundreds of things (I'm not suggesting that it *is* necessarily any of those things, you know the situation better than I, but just because they're wealthy, doesn't mean there aren't cultural disinclinations to one job or another. Societal pressures don't just mean poverty.)
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 2, Interesting

      but that's the point, they don't even have to be wealthy. They are given half or full scholarships and treated like royalty by the school because the ratio is 40 to 1, and I could see it being societal if the were just dropping out, but the fact is that they just don't drop out, they drop because their failing out. Girls I know pick schools by locations and how much fun they're going to have there, guys that want to be engineers, just look at the school, and its curiculum I went to school in Flint Michigan when I went to Kettering. No parties really, dreary weather, shitty town. And girls left, I stayed, so after I went through 5 years of B.S. hell and 4 years of grad hell. This is my pay back, my cushy office in my own consulting company. And now the city is pushing for my company to be more diverse. It's pissing me off. It's a free country and I will hire the best person for the job, not the mediocre person that fills out my quota system

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    3. Re:sometimes I think to myself by mattreilly · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Girls I know pick schools by locations and how much fun they're going to have there,

      That say more about the people you hang around with and you than it does the female population in general. You've supposedly got a "cushy office" in your own consulting company and you're still referring to woman as girls. I can't imagine why they would pressure your company to diversify.

    4. Re:sometimes I think to myself by gowen · · Score: 1
      It's a free country and I will hire the best person for the job, not the mediocre person that fills out my quota system
      Its not about a job, its a TV show.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:sometimes I think to myself by EatHam · · Score: 1

      1. Quite a few people refer to females in college as "girls". Especially those of us who graduated several years ago. Ever heard the expressions "High school girls", "College Girls", etc.?

      2. I don't know about anyone else, and I'm certainly not making a generalization about a female engineering population from a school that I've never attended, but at my college, there were quite a few girls/women/females/other non-objectional term who were attending strictly for their MRS degree.

      So societal, parental, whatever, there were very few serious engineering students at my school. Companies too have a difficult time finding them to hire. For example, my sister (Industrial Engineer) was getting actively recruited, signing bonuses, the whole nine at a time when male engineers were getting dick-all.

    6. Re:sometimes I think to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you who perpetuate gender stereotypes and keep the work from working towards societal equality. Go back to college and take a women's studies course and learn how the world really is for women.

    7. Re:sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      I took several women's study courses in college, where I got to enjoy "The Vagina Monologues", "The Feminine Mystique",and countless other books that explained to me how I am emotionless, set on sex, work and power. But you wouldn't call those books sexist. I didn't say I wouldn't hire women, we have 2 Network Engineer females here right now. I hire by experience and aptitude, not by sex, color, or anything else, hell if you showed me a dog that could program a router and had some experience in internet security, he would be on our team, if he wore a tie to the interview.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    8. Re:sometimes I think to myself by operagost · · Score: 1

      I'll tell Huckleberry Hound to send in his application.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    9. Re:sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      That would be great, We always wanted a Cisco Certified Hound

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    10. Re:sometimes I think to myself by EatHam · · Score: 1

      It's people like you who perpetuate gender stereotypes

      No it's not. It's the very specific group that I mentioned above. If you re-read my post, you will notice that I mentioned "my school", and that I was specifically *not* generalizing. This was in fact *my* experience at *my* school during the time that *I* went there which was like 10 years ago. My sister graduated quite a bit more recently which is why I mention that male engineers were getting dick-all. In case you hadn't noticed, it is relatively difficult to find a new job these days.

    11. Re:sometimes I think to myself by blackwidowb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Alright, I will admit that engineering/scientific girls are in the minority, but I really hope you don't feel that none of them are capable of doing what guys can. Because just looking at my family should be enough to prove that wrong

      Every single person in my family has programmed at some point in their lifetime. That's one son and three daughters, by the way. My brother didn't much care for it, and hasn't continued with it. One sister only programmed COBOL, so that doesn't count for much. One of my sisters aced almost every class she ever took (at Michigan Tech) and is now a perfectly capable professor of mechanical engineering who is researching carbon nanotubes, and would be a shoe-in for this if she had the time.

      And then you have me. Yes, I am female. Yes, I can code, and do so as a profession. In high school, I scored in the top percentile of mechanically inclined people in the USA on tests. I did quite well in most of my science and CS classes in college. I'm not trying to brag. Just saying that I am not a socialite who went to college for fun. I didn't intend on making any friends in college. I wanted to learn.

      So, while I do acknowledge that I am one of very few, please do not discount scientific-minded females as a whole. It gets very tiresome to be told I can't think in a certain way just because I am female.

    12. Re:sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      once again you made it a case that no females can do anything instead of actually reading the post and seeing that the question was not weather a female could do it, but why she should get preferential treatment. >In high school, I scored in the top percentile >of mechanically inclined people in the USA on >tests. Just out of curiousity what were those tests? I don't remember taking the "Mechanically Inclined People in the USA" Test when I was in high school. I took the PSAT, SAT, PLAN, ACT, NASFAB and that's it. let me know what you took and I'll photograph my scores in all of these tests and photograph my old roommates scores. and you can see how she got a 10,000$ a year scholarship when we were in college and I got a 4000$ a year scholarship. And when you see how I am ussually 5 percentile higher than her, or the difference between her 1250 on the SAT and my 1400. Then we can discuss how women are treated unfairly.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    13. Re:sometimes I think to myself by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Maybe the ones at Waterloo were put off by the drunken naked guys running laps around their residence?
      My old roommates had lots of stories involving quantities of alcohol and stupidity. What woman would want to be exposed to drunken, horny, engineers on a nightly basis? (If you have an answer to that, there are people on here willing to pay for the answer.)

    14. Re:sometimes I think to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, you mean learn how it was 20 years ago before they were given advantages over men in the workforce in almost every way?

    15. Re:sometimes I think to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell if you showed me a dog that could program a router and had some experience in internet security, he would be on our team, if he wore a tie to the interview.

      Ah, so it's clothing discrimination you use then!

    16. Re:sometimes I think to myself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What woman would want to be exposed to drunken, horny, engineers on a nightly basis?

      Drunken, horny, engineering women. Now if you can find some, there are people willing to pay for that too... (in some states)

    17. Re:sometimes I think to myself by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      I hire by experience and aptitude, not by sex, color, or anything else,

      vs.

      hell if you showed me a dog that could program a router and had some experience in internet security, he would be on our team, if he wore a tie to the interview.

      You're contradicting yourself.

    18. Re:sometimes I think to myself by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      actually in English lit, you will find out that it is appropriate to refer to something that most certainly has a sex, but you don't know what it will be, as he. Saying he/she is strictly out of the question.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    19. Re:sometimes I think to myself by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Um, I was referring to your requiring the applicant wear a tie to the interview, when you say earlier on you hire by "experience and aptitude".

  33. Re:Never Fails by sheetsda · · Score: 4, Informative

    See the Cathy Rogers interview, first question.

  34. Wish it were for Scrap Heap by nedron · · Score: 1

    Too bad this wasn't a call for contestant on Scrap Heap. The American installments of Junkyard Wars have been generally awful, with pparticipants who act no better than your average (American) football fan. Ugh! The British teams always seemed as if they were actually having fun, but the American teams spend most of their time posturing and sniping at one another. The Young Guns were the worst.

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  35. Re:Never Fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is quite a bit of editing going on. Some sequences are shown out of order and they concentrate on the spectacular (which is usually also disastrous) rather than the four hours of welding. Teams also have a bit of time the next day without the tools and equipment to do "touch up" work. And sometimes, the machines just plain suck.

  36. ummm...get a degree by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    Get a degree in Engineering like most of us here, I imagine. I don't suggest computer engineering, That's what my major was and well, I have my degree, but I hated it. lol

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:ummm...get a degree by MadLibs · · Score: 1

      well if i thought i had a mechanical bone in my body (NO RUDE COMMENTS HERE!) i would consider it, as i really am interested. but theres a reason my degree was communications (not telecomm, just good ole publication editing, PR, advertising, broadcast, etc.) and that i can barely add and subtract (ok, ok, ok, and i can barely type either). my mind just doesnt think like that.

  37. hmm by K. · · Score: 1

    Why did they change the name from Scrapheap Challenge to Junkyard Wars, I wonder. Junkyard I can understand, it's a localisation thing. But why Wars?

    And why did they drop Kryten? He was deadly!

    --
    -- Proud descendant of semi-nomadic cattle-herders.
    1. Re:hmm by REBloomfield · · Score: 1

      Because one's English, and the other one is American :) Ditto for Robert Lewellyn, he's here, someone else is over there....

    2. Re:hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cant you guys clone him and send us a copy, we need someone like him over here.

  38. The beginning of the end by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tonight, on a very special episode of Junkyard Wars- Two guys in wheel chairs join the megalomaniacs. Can Nosher find the true beauty within them, or will he be untouched by their stoic perseverance at trying to drag a mini out of a pile of crap? Will he tear their wheelchairs apart to get the motors? Will they all cry together at the end?
    Will this show suck?

    --
    Carpe Deez
    1. Re:The beginning of the end by nigelc · · Score: 1
      Given that the last time I saw Nosher, he was tearing an electric wheelchair apart to get at a drive motor, I suspect that he'd welcome the chance to have team members who bring their own spare parts (-: .

      I suppose that RDF will be changing the rules of the show a little.
      It is now forbidden to use parts of your team-members' prosthetic aids in your contraptions.

      --


      Cthulhu Barata Nikto
  39. To bad they don't want by TerryAtWork · · Score: 3, Funny

    people who like to post 'F1r5t p0t7 d00d! 1'm 1337!'

    Then they'd have come to the right place.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  40. Why does this come into play? by rindeee · · Score: 1

    "Junkyard Wars wants applications from people of all ages, races, creeds, colors, sexes, religions, and sexual orientations..." This is not a question of right or wrong. I completely fail to undersatnd why who/what you perfer to have sex with is a criteria for any job/tv gameshow.

    1. Re:Why does this come into play? by mattreilly · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Maybe you'll understsand after you have sex for the first time. Don't give up!!!!

    2. Re:Why does this come into play? by Astrorunner · · Score: 1

      Boobies = higher ratings.

  41. Is in in the desert? by oliverthered · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Turn this super gun into an oil pipe running through afganistan.
    Conpanies in the US and UK will provide all the materials, and the US, UK governments will provide any 'assistants' you need, incease any 'problems' are encountered.

    BTW Junk Yard wars was a UK programme called Scrap Heap chanlange. Conisidence?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  42. Affirmative Action for game shows?!? by Dopeskills · · Score: 0

    Affirmative action for game shows?!? What is this world coming to....

    1. Re:Affirmative Action for game shows?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the women who works for me tried out for a dating game show--I don't remember which one.

      She said their were 1,000 prospects in this theater, and each person trying out had to get up on stage and talk about themselves.

      Now, she is attractive, but she is also Arabic. She was chosen to go on the show, and the specific reason the staff gave her was because she was "ethnic."

  43. An Insightful Slashdot Poll..? by riflemann · · Score: 1
    I am:

    Caucasian

    Black

    Asian

    Hispanic

    Middle eastern

    Native [Australian/American/etc]

    Mixed

    Cowboynealean

    1. Re:An Insightful Slashdot Poll..? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you lump together "native"? (Maybe you meant "conquered"?) Remember that a "native" in somewhere like Britain, for example, is a pasty white person.

      Seriously, split that option out to Inuit, North American, South American, Australian at least.

      And as long as you're splitting Caucasian and Hispanic, how about Indian (west Asian) and maybe Polynesian?

    2. Re:An Insightful Slashdot Poll..? by DDR+Palmer · · Score: 0

      This is overcomplicated. I am: Aryan A Jew Negroid Mongoloid Mongrel of the above

      --
      David Duncan Ross Palmer, author of OverChat
  44. This show has jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found this show pretty fun a few years ago but it has grown tiresome, dull, repetitive and predictable.
    I just go outside now for fun.
    *Outside*?
    Yeah, you know, trees, people, walking?

  45. Goddammit! by liquidsin · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why must I be trapped in this caucasian-male-between-the-ages-of-18-and-35-years -old body? All this PC shit sucks! I'm in the key demographic but I now I won't be able to compete?! Sucks to that!

    --
    do not read this line twice.
    1. Re:Goddammit! by DDR+Palmer · · Score: 0

      You could always start flapping your right hand about and saying you're a homosexual. Do you have spikey hair? Better still, black your face up, you'd have rights with no responsibillities then!

      --
      David Duncan Ross Palmer, author of OverChat
  46. I miss Robert Llewellyn! by PixelJuice · · Score: 1

    It's just not the same without Kryten.. *sigh* Whomever is hosting it now doesn't do the program format justice. IMHO.

  47. Just like real life! by hpulley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever worked on a project with a deadline? Notice how more work always gets done right at the end, no matter what you do? Specification, design, etc. at the beginning seem to take a long time while getting nothing done but implementation goes quickly near the end. Testing -- what testing?

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???
    1. Re:Just like real life! by PinkFloyd · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the saying:
      "If you wait 'til the last minute, it only takes a minute."

      --

      The face of a child can say it all, especially the mouth part of the face.
  48. Re:Lemme get this right by mattreilly · · Score: 0

    So I'm young, white, christian, male and straight (sex. orientations) and except for a pair of glasses I am otherwise perfectly able. Do I stand a chance to get qualified ? :)

    Probably not as much as some others but you can console yourself in the knowledge that you've always had the right to vote, never been someone's property or indiscriminately hung from trees.

  49. Re: You got it right by Luxury+P.+Yacht · · Score: 1

    This is unabashed political correctness. The hell with individuality. Which special group/s do you belong to? I suppose the producers would be especially pleased with themselves if they could manage to sign up a 72 year old Hispanic quadriplegic lesbian wiccan. Their collective smugness would be palpable

    --
    Bush should have died, not Reagan -- Morrissey
    Morrissey rides a cockhorse -- The Warlock Pinchers
  50. Research Triangle Team by QuietRiot · · Score: 1
    Who'd like to put together a team from the Raleigh/Durham, NC area? If there are some people that'd like to get together, please respond here.

    I grew up on a farm with a well-equipped shop and was always putting things together. I've also got an degree from Cornell Bio. & Ag. Engineering. Proficient in all sorts of mechanical and electrical systems.

    If you're local, and feel like trying this - I'm all about digging through junk piles to get random shit built! email: cyrus_yunker at ncsu.edu Include in subject 'slashdot'.

    1. Re:Research Triangle Team by gimple · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the application:

      "Unlike previous seasons, competitors will be chosen this year as individuals, not as complete teams." (Their emphasis, not mine)

      I think I liked the team concept better.

    2. Re:Research Triangle Team by wolf- · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. By just throwing a bunch of people together, the show will start to reak of "Experiment Island", the show for whiners and tantrum throwers.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  51. Junkyard Wars Wants You? by BMonger · · Score: 2, Funny

    But in Soviet Russia...

    You want Junkyard Wa....

    Never mind.

    1. Re:Junkyard Wars Wants You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darn, I had the same idea when I saw that title.

    2. Re:Junkyard Wars Wants You? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A million people had the same idea, it was the most obvious joke imaginable. It's just that most were smart enough not to post.

  52. Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It disturbs me that diversity is increasingly defined as different races, sexes, sexual-orientations, etc. Defining diversity in these ways assumes a stereotypical view of the world: "all people of one race must have the same views, and they must be represented". This logic only holds as far as the stereotype holds--which is not far. It is not fair to put people in a box, and I fear that attemps to bring in "diversity" are quite discriminating.

    This is the inherent problem with affirmative action policies that (for the sake of diversity) discriminate against the majority. This further de-values the minority by effectively saying that "a person of minority can't excel on his/her own, so we must help them."

    I'm a big fan of the show, and what I've noticed over the years is that the teams are quite diverse in character, intellect, and skills. I hope the show continues to choose teams based on these criteria. I would hate for the show to choose a team because they have decided that they have to have a "gay team" and a "black team".

    --White Male (let the flaming begin)

    1. Re:Diversity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your point about reverse-discrimination is a valid one.

      What concerns me more (in the big picture), is that so-called affirmative action is actually highlighting the significance of the role of race/gender/etc. instead of diminishing them.

    2. Re:Diversity by DDR+Palmer · · Score: 0

      I don't agree with affirmative action / positive descrimination. It's not to do with putting races down though. It's about descrimination against the Aryan people. It is a fact that negroes wouldn't get too far into any field of life except being thieves. In fact, they couldn't even pull off intelligent crime such as fraud. This is why negroes steal but the whites and the Jews can get away with fraud. Descrimination aknowledges that some races are better at certain things than others. Realising that Aryans built society, the Jew is a parasite and the negro just smokes and steals is a good start to recognising those differences.

      --
      David Duncan Ross Palmer, author of OverChat
  53. LISA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lisa Rogers is way cuter. Her voice drives me wild.

  54. Which show with Henry Rollins?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't even know Henry *had* a show!!!!

    1. Re:Which show with Henry Rollins?? by AssFace · · Score: 0, Troll

      As far as I know the Brit chick that was the host on Junkyard Wars is now on a new show and her co-host is Henry Rollins.
      I have never actually seen the show, but it too is on TLC or the Discovery Channel (they are both owned by the same company anyway I think).
      I *think* the shows premise is similar, except that there are more teams and they build the stuff at home with presumably better stuff or something... but like I said, I've never seen the show, so I could be way off.

      I don't even know the name of the show - just know that they are hosts... "Monster Madness" or something like that.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    2. Re:Which show with Henry Rollins?? by Shadwhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      The show is called Full Metal Challenge.

      The premise is basically that a couple dozen teams from around the world (there were teams from Argentina, Germany, China, Chile...) get $3000 and 30 days to build a do-anything vehicle. Then they're all shipped to a decomissioned nuclear power plant where they compete in different games, including steep hill climbs, swamp racing, a 'roller coaster' with see-saw platforms and steeply banked turns, bowling, and something loosely based on soccer (football).
      Each episode has 3 teams competing against each other, and the two teams with the highest number of points at the end of the episode get to Sumo wrestle each other with the ground covered in tires, soapy water, barb wire, and caltrops.

      The winner of the first season was a British beast of a machine with 8 wheels and two engines. They beat out a Quebec team with a good tracked design (they nearly got second place in the soccer game with a thrown track!), which seemed to have mechanical problems in the final Sumo match.

      It's not as good as Junkyard Wars, but with what they learned in the first season, any second season should be better.

    3. Re:Which show with Henry Rollins?? by Vulcana · · Score: 1

      The show is Full Metal Challenge.

      They take teams from around the world and give them 30 days to build the world's best vehicle. (They also have a budget but I forget what it is)

      The show tests the vehicles that come in and give a description of the build as well as some explaination for the design choices.

  55. Planted Items by tricky+Ric · · Score: 1

    Junkyard Wars is a cool show, but there is always a planted item that takes away from the raw inventiveness of the show. For example, the other night the teams built full-size, remote controled cars to battle each other, and both teams found several working servo-motor in the trash heap. How many ordinary junkyards have 6 separate working servo motors?

    1. Re:Planted Items by Animats · · Score: 1

      We used to have places like that in Silicon Valley, but they were squeezed out by the dot-com boom. Now all we seem to have are surplus places full of outdated PCs at inflated prices.

    2. Re:Planted Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they used power window motors and wheelchair motors for actuators. They were given the RC transmitters and tiny servos for control, though.

    3. Re:Planted Items by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These were less planted then the Steem Engines.
      The servos came from a RC plane, the Power windows in a minivan, and the windshield wiper motor of a car (It has been a while since I saw that episode).

  56. last season was not filmed in the same place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US one was again near LA, the UK one was in the UK. You can spot the last season because Kathy wasn't on either show, since she was filming "Full Metal Madness".

    In other seasons, both shows were filmed in the same place. Except for the first season where there was no US version.

  57. I nominate Maxwell Hall by DulcetTone · · Score: 3, Funny
    Maker of the best hackery on the web that no one knows about: Plywood Guy

    Plywood Guy is an "exercise in the magic power of plywood and drywall screws. He crouches! He stands! He stores potential energy!"

    tone

    --
    tone
    1. Re:I nominate Maxwell Hall by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Obviously the product of a patriarchal dead white European male oppressor.

      Look at how pasty it is!
      Look at how MALE it is! I mean, it's called a...a...GUY!

      This evil oppressor of anything not white and male must be stopped.

      Quick! Somebody burn a bra!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  58. Re:Lemme get this right by jgerman · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    you've always had the right to vote, never been someone's property or indiscriminately hung from trees


    Hmmm, just like everyone else in the U.S. Nope, no consolation.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  59. Real Engineers by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Will hack anything they can; they don't limit themselves to software and a little computer hardware. How many /.ers have rebuilt an auto engine? I have done a couple in my day, and I'd bet the percentage is way more than the general population. There are way to many comments on this story that stereotype people on /. without any consideration of reality.

    And on the diversity front; yes, engineers as a group are a lot more white and male than the population and even many other professions, but that doesn't mean we don't value diversity. We just don't have much time for a 'token' anything. I hope they can find a couple of competent participants that are not white males to spice up their show, but it will flop if these people don't add something to the teams they are on.

    The question I have is whether participants are paid. I would volunteer in a heartbeat if they made it worth my while, but I don't have time to just contribute my valuable time to their money making operation. I also think the concept could be a lot cooler if it wasn't so much of a race as a true engineering competition. You could still factor in time as a bonus for shorter time taken, but rushing through things rarely makes for good engineering.

    You could also downplay the 'wars' part of it and mix in some footage of a wide variety of wild and weird engineering feets, projects and competitions. Highlights of the 2.70 contest from MIT would always be good for a side story. For those who don't know the reference, '2.70' is the course number for a mechnical engineering design course that features a design competition where you get a box of parts and a goal, and teams just go at it. It has been featured on some programs in the past (Scientific American is one such program AFIAK). Just a thought.

    1. Re:Real Engineers by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      You could also downplay the 'wars' part of it and mix in some footage of a wide variety of wild and weird engineering feets, projects and competitions.

      What about those handicapped engineers they're looking for who might have no feets?

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    2. Re:Real Engineers by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Well, now we know why real engineers don't run television shows.

      If engineering is the art of building something for $1 that any idiot can build for $2, Junkyard Wars is the art of building in ten hours what any engineer can build in a week (oh wait, thats just the design phase).

    3. Re:Real Engineers by Skevos+Mavros · · Score: 1
      The question I have is whether participants are paid. I would volunteer in a heartbeat if they made it worth my while(...)

      Heh. If you'll only do it if you get paid, then you wouldn't be volunteering would you? :)

      But terminology pedantry aside, I agree - it always seems cheeky to me when a for-profit show pays everyone involved except the contestants - especially when the contestants are made to work so hard!

  60. Apparently, they DON'T want me by gsfprez · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    i'm a German-American aerospace engineer - so apparently, so they ob-fscking-ously don't want me.

    I'm going to put this one up on my wall of fame...right next to the time i had a black 4-star general tell me that the Air Force still has a problem with diversity.

    Jesus tapdancing Christ - GET OVER YOUR SKIN COLOR.

    (before you think i'm totally nuts - i do live in Los Angeles... the race-baiting capital of the world... and where lighter-skin-colored-European-Americans are by far becoming the smallest minority)

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  61. Junkyard wars " M$ Internet Edition" by Cyberia · · Score: 4, Funny


    Contestants must take code snipets from Real M$ applications and make some thing that REALLY functions and DOES what they planned it to do, and it won't cost a fortune to build, and can be done in a matter of 10 hours.

  62. Americans in Britan? And they're NOT tourists? by rbullo · · Score: 1

    \FLAMEBAIT\ Isn't this a British show? Why would posting on Slashdot, whose audience is mostly American, have any effect? Unless the show is providing free travel, I'm not going across the Atlantic just to be on a show that is not entirely popular in America. \/FLAMEBAIT\

    --
    OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
    1. Re:Americans in Britan? And they're NOT tourists? by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      Nope Scrapheap Challenge is the British show. Junkyard wars is the one for the US market.

  63. I'm sick of this crap by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    So far, I've seen all these posts decrying the want for those with disabilities and people of color to sign up for junkyard wars. Its making me sick. I for one, am a person of color, and it would be nice to occaisionally see someone on there who is not pasty white. Nothing wrong with caucasian individuals, but a splash of color every now and again would be good. I am entering myself, and I'm sure that them seeing hte video with me on it may help a bit, but i"ll probably get passed over.

    You know what else? I also have a disability, and am apart of hte growing amount of identified geeks out there who have been diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. Probably won't make for good TV, but fuck it....I had to get it off my chest.

    I'm sick of all these fucking jokes about lesbian builders. This is serious!

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
    1. Re:I'm sick of this crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to know you have something you can blame your failings on isn't. (I mean convincing a doctor to diagnose you will Asperger Syndrome.)

      I don't think anyone has a problem with "those of color" getting on Junkyard Wars. They have a problem with the FACT that highly, qualified contestants will be overlooked in search of one-legged, female, single-mother, blacks with Ph.D's in chemistry because they are traditionally "under represented."

    2. Re:I'm sick of this crap by DDR+Palmer · · Score: 0

      It's not about representing negroes. This is the symptom the liberals are always whinging about, the same situation when negroes call for "respect" and fail to realise that to earn respect one first has to be respectable. Ergo, you don't get on the show just for being a negro, or at least, you should not. You should get in for being able to do the job. The fact is that the negro doesn't actually give much to society at all!

      --
      David Duncan Ross Palmer, author of OverChat
    3. Re:I'm sick of this crap by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I for one, am a person of color, and it would be nice to occaisionally see someone on there who is not pasty white.

      So you'd like people to be put on the show based on the color of their skin? And you don't think that devalues people of color? I mean, really: Do you want to be on the show because you've earned and deserve it, or do you want them just handing it over to you because your skin is the right shade of grey?

      If you have the skills and abilities to get put on this show, then get there based on those skills instead of pulling out the race card.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  64. Re:Never Fails by don_carnage · · Score: 1

    They covered this on their "junkyard bloopers" show that aired last week. They may be re-running it -- look for it. There is a lot more that goes on behind the scenes than you are aware of.

  65. Re:Cathy rogers! by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

    That's because she actually runs the LA branch of RDF television now. She didn't just host the show, she invented it.

  66. Nominate the fundie fartbags by VegeBrain · · Score: 2, Funny

    I nominate Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson because they both have very extensive experience in fabrication.

  67. What about me? by PygmyTrojan · · Score: 1
    as well as people with physical disabilities

    I have no arms, but can rebuild an engine with my feet, I wonder if I'll make the cut.

    --

    Trying is the first step towards failure.

  68. Re:Never Fails by excessive · · Score: 1

    Hey, the Scrapyard challenge (The UK program that Junkyard challenge is based on) pilot episode/program was a two day thing where they had to build a hovercraft and get it around a course. They've now effectively halved the time...

  69. I'm putting together my team.... by DrJohnnie · · Score: 3, Funny

    During lunch I'm going to run out in the shop and ask all the black welders and machinist if they're gay.....

  70. You have a little more diversity now!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one will not be watching Junkyard Wars anymore. I'm just one rebel from the seemly conquered White race... I will instead spend my time pursuing the advancement of my own people. To hell with the masses of White cowards who so easily surrender and submit.

    A. Wyatt Mann

  71. Re:Lemme get this right by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, just like everyone else in the U.S. Nope, no consolation.

    You seem to be forgetting that whole slavery thing. Or civil rights thing. Or women getting the right to vote in the 20s.

  72. Monter Garage Crew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say the let guys from Monster Garage compete as one of the teams.

  73. Reverse Descrimination by diablobynight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I fear for the future of the world now. I realise this is just for a tv show, but you must understand it's happening everywhere now. Colleges being the worse, right now my wife and I are trying to get pregnant, and I am praying for a daughter, because I fear the world a white male from America would face, he would be passed over on scholarships for people with lower scores than him, passed over on jobs for people with less schooling or experience, all because he is a white male. Why is this fair, prejudice is prejudice, no matter how you do it. If you prejudice in favor of one group, it is still just that. I want to raise my children in a world blind to color and gender, instead of a world that hates them for coming from an upper class family and being of the majority.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:Reverse Descrimination by Pope · · Score: 1

      Of course, you realise that the phrase "reverse discrimination" is essentially meaningless, right?

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  74. I want to see... by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1

    the show that pits the White Supremacist Geeks against the Black Gay Jewish Construction Workers

    --

    It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

  75. Troll by oosid · · Score: 1

    I think that this post was just a troll to see what a bunch of homogeneous, narrow minded, tunnel visioned, chair monkeys slashdotters are. Guess what?! It worked!

  76. How about "Software Junkyard Wars"... by DrCode · · Score: 1

    You're given a pile of old code and obsolete libraries, and you have 10 hours to construct something useful out of it.

    1. Re:How about "Software Junkyard Wars"... by snareplr · · Score: 1

      The M$ programers would take the prize!, They do that every day!

    2. Re:How about "Software Junkyard Wars"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, now that's what I call exciting television!

  77. Re:Never Fails by pmz · · Score: 1

    Some editing tricks perhaps?

    I've seen the show a few times, and occasionally one team's machine or whatever is really a joke (i.e., the team's original strategy failed and the deadline really bit them in the ass). There was one episode where they built rockets: one team designed a fundamentally unstable rocket that looked like crap and flopped on launch--they obviously had run out of time.

  78. for more viewers by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    While I doubt that it will actually work, what is wrong for them wanting to expand their viewership?

    If they want to expand their viewership, they should ask for more hot applicants...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  79. Re:Lemme get this right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which would apply to anyone who is currently older than 100 years old...

  80. Re:Sounds like fun, by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I would apply, but I'm not black, I'm not gay, and I'm not a woman. So its futile, since I'll be discriminated againts 3 times before they even check to see if I'm qualified.

    The scary thing? I'm actually with Bush on the whole affirmative action thing...it is wrong. Discriminating agains a particular racial group, one way or another, is not a good idea. (Even if people from one group discriminated against the other before...if it was wrong that way, its wrong the other way too!)

    They are surprised to get so much more men then women to want to be in a show called junkyard wars? What is wrong with this picture? The applications, or the expectations?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  81. Well so long as they can weld by taniwha · · Score: 1

    it shouldn't be a problem

  82. You would see the problem by diablobynight · · Score: 1

    if instead of them saying they wanted more women and what not, they said we want more white males. Then everyone would raise a shit fest, but it's ok to prejudice against white males.

    --
    Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    1. Re:You would see the problem by jblaze · · Score: 1

      When that's the burden you have to bear as being one of the most powerful demographics in history. Boo-hoo

  83. The Slashdot team by GriffX · · Score: 1

    If the slashdot team trips and falls, will the host yell "Tools down"?

    --
    These comments and opinions are mine and mine alone, although they shouldn't be.
  84. Unfair to blacks. I'm going to sue. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    It is good to encourage people of all sorts to participate in this show. I just want to point out that sometimes, though, all this encouragement gets old. For example, why do they specifically have to ask people of "color" to join? This all stems from so-called political correctness. Well, you have to be so considerate to every single person that in the end, nobody gets any consideration because everyone is so busy being considerate. Screw that! Color, sex, religion, shape, size, etc. are only continuing to hold people back BECAUSE of the fact that everyone has to be considerate. Why should people like me, who are so-called "minorities," be cut more slack than "white" people on things like tests? Do you want a brain surgeon who got his job because he could spell his name? Consider this: Forget about color, sex, religion, shape, size, etc. Just forget it and treat everyone the same way, like a person, for cryin' out loud. Then the problem will end. Just say, "We want folks to join Junkyard Wars." That's it!

    Or... I can see it now. Some black guy, er, excuse me, African American who has never been to Africa, mind you, will join this program, participate, and lose the contest because their catamaran or whatever they had to build, uh, sank. Not because they're black (I mean African American), but because the mechanism somehow failed, just like it would have for some white guy. So this guy is going to sue Junkyard Wars for making black people look stupid. Well, hell, I'm black, maybe I should do this myself.

  85. Re:Lemme get this right by jgerman · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, can they vote now? Yes. Is there slavery now, yes. Slavery ended how many years ago? Any woman that couldn't vote in the 20's when she was 18 is well over 90 now. So no it's no cosolation. White males suffer through higher qualification criteria for a host of things, simply because they're white males.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  86. Junkyard challenge by DDR+Palmer · · Score: 0

    It's called Junkyard Challenge. Everybody knows this. Don't need to be obsessed with war. Fed up with hearing about war.

    --
    David Duncan Ross Palmer, author of OverChat
  87. The application? by The_K4 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read the application? I'm kinda annoyed that 1/2 the questions were trying to prove that you watch the show. I watch that show as often as I get the chance, but I don't get it as my house, so I catch them like once every couple of months. I don't think they should be so worried about how much you watch the show and car more about how you would do....oh never mind, we need to keep the advertisers happy. :(

  88. Individual entries this year by zsazsa · · Score: 1

    In contrast to previous seasons, this year we are looking for individual applicants who are skilled at putting together sophisticated machinery and not afraid of getting their hands dirty.

    I'm a bit worried about the 'individual applicants' part. Part of what makes JYW/SHC so great is the camaraderie of the teams. With a few exceptions, they're a delight to see working together as one.

    I'm concerned about throwing a group of people together. Are they wanting to introduce more "reality TV" elements in by putting strangers together? The show TLC show "Escape from Experiment Island" is like this, and it absolutely stinks (for that and other contrived "reality TV"-like elements).

  89. Re:Lemme get this right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fortunately, times have changed... history teaches many lessons, but living in the past solves none of the current issues.

  90. clarification please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    ... not afraid of getting their hands dirty... Junkyard Wars wants ... people with physical disabilities.

    Uh, including hand amputees? I'm confused. Do 3 mental disabilities equal one physical disability? How about 10 social disabilities?

  91. Isn't this how we got by blair1q · · Score: 1

    ...the plan to attack Iraq?

  92. 7F??? Those CAN'T be real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty big breasts for such a skinny guy, wouldn't you say?

    1. Re:7F??? Those CAN'T be real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny.

      But far too subtle for slashbots.

  93. Re:Bone-O-Rama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    613746 (613746) How?? ??

  94. Re:Sounds like fun (OT) by Stackster · · Score: 1

    Mystery solved:

    1. [A-Za-z ]+
    2. Imagine a beowulf cluster of (1).
    3. Profit!!

    --

    There are 010 kinds of people. Those who understand octal, those who don't, and 06 other kinds of morons.
  95. Junkward What? by pHsHsTK · · Score: 1

    Real men watch Monster Garage.

    1. Re:Junkward What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmm... What is Monster Garage??

      Error: Link not found

    2. Re:Junkward What? by Humpinate · · Score: 1

      No Sh*t !!!!!
      Great show, and well worth sitting through the F*cking commercials.
      (BTW, I am a Master Control Operator and I HATE the F*ckin' things.)

  96. "people of color" ... "crops" ... by evil_pb · · Score: 1

    Absolutely beautiful choice of wording...

  97. Junkyard Wars is in decline... but can be saved. by Darlington · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Junkyard Wars used to be my favourite show. I watched it every week, chasing it around the schedule as it jumped from night to night, and would often watch the repeat on Saturday. The premise was and still is great. But here are the five things that truly made the show fun back in the old days:
    1. Great host(s)
    2. Fantastic machine builds
    3. Interesting team characters
    4. Wonderful sense of sportsmanship, that it was all in fun
    5. Fair play
    We had these things in seasons 1-4 and to some degree in season 6 (all British imports of the renamed "Scrapheap Challenge" with Robert). But in seasons 5 and 7, each of these things have been lost.

    1. THE HOSTS: In the old says we had Robert Lewellyn, who was perfect. He was funny, had clever insights, and joked around with the teams. Who can forget his impersonation of a V8 engine? The show brought Cathy onscreen as a foil for him, and that worked out fine too -- they played well off each other. Then we got George Gray. Who was about 50% as fun and interesting as Robert (but still acceptable). Now they've hit rock-bottom with Tyler, who offers no ad-lib humour, no insights, nothing -- all he does is yell -- and a generic hollywood talking head chick who doesn't even have as much personality as Tyler.

    2. MACHINE BUILDS: There was a time when it mattered if your machine worked or not, and if you really tried. Teams came up with brilliant designs, and there were failures, but they had to work at least a LITTLE. And teams did things that were ambitious. On one of the old British shows, a team actually built a demolition machine with a hydraulic claw. And it WORKED! Yes, they eventually had some hydraulic problems and their radiator sprung a leak, but when have we seen anything that great in the last three seasons? Nowadays we have things like "Mega Wars", where teams get two days to build an all-terrain amphibious vehicle, and in those two days, two of the teams manage to do nothing more than strip down an existing truck and hook some empty drums on for flotation in the water part of the challenge. Or we get challenges like the Hydrofoil, where the competition is a boat that can't hydrofoil vs. a boat that can't move at all. It's a disgrace.

    3. TEAM CHARACTERS: The Bodgers, The Long Brothers, The Techno Teachers, even the original Orange and Yellow teams were full of interesting, likeable characters. We all loved Anne, Nosher, Dick, and the rest of the old crews. We cared about them and rooted for them.

    In contrast, the teams that won the last two US seasons have had one thing in common: they're both comprised of obnoxious, cursing, unlikable jerks with no personalities. Our only hope in watching their progress through the season was that they'd lose and we wouldn't have to see them again.

    Let's face it: when we're against the teams, we're against the show.

    4. SPORTSMANSHIP: In the old days teams would trade with each other if they needed something. Nowadays they just steal it. Back then, teams joked around and had a good time. Our kids could watch the show and learn how to be a good sport, that there was such a thing as friendly competition, that winning wasn't everything. Now the teams mock each other's failures, openly berate the experts who try to help them, jump on each other's stolen stuff and are all-around poor sports. We can't let our kids watch the show anymore. It sends them the wrong message.

    5. FAIR PLAY: I don't think it's news to anyone that season 7's team won by cheating. Twice. And the last US season was "won" by a big cheat-off in the demolition final where both teams just ran their trucks into the walls because neither of them could make even their basic machines work. What a disappointment.

    What can JW do now?

    If you ask me, it's a simple matter to address these five issues.

    1. HOSTS: Put Robert and Cathy together again. Period.

    2. BUILDS: Talk to your experts before challenges. Make sure they have interesting ideas to present. Talk to your teams. Make sure everyone knows that their machines need to work. Do more creative editing if necessary. Find more good challenges. Ice racers, with 4-wheel drive, 4-wheel steering and homemade studded tires? Pipe sleds that need to travel inside big pipes and be invertable, with wheels top and bottom? Pole climbing machines? OK, my ideas aren't all gems, but that's 2 minutes' work off the top of my head. I'll bet Cathy & co. can do a lot better than I can -- or than what we've been getting lately.

    3. CHARACTERS: Rather than making everyone on the team required to be a welder, pick teams that are going to be fun to watch and who demonstrate some imagination. If necessary, bring back teams from previous seasons. Why not? We liked them before. We'd like to see them again. Particularly some of the early teams, whom new viewers might have never seen at all.

    4. SPORTSMANSHIP: This springs from #3, but is something you can enforce too.

    5. FAIR PLAY: Make the rules clear and stick to them.

    Making these changes would cost the show almost nothing, and would in my opinion save the show. Longtime fans would be thrilled to see a new golden age of JW, and new fans would be won over.

  98. "Scrapheap Challenge" in the UK by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

    We seem to suffer from a surfeit of fat Army types and bad-ass bikers with moustaches. Even worse, we now get that tart Lisa Rogers instead of the thinking geek's crumpet Cathy Rogers who has buggered off over the pond :-(

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  99. Political Correctness in excess! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good god, that PC bullshit made me want to puke. funk that.

  100. "An ass out of you and me." by JKConsult · · Score: 2, Funny
    The headline assumes that since I'm reading Slashdot, I have the remotest of mechanical skills. My fiery death on JW would prove this assumption to be patently (and dangerously) false.

    An Army recruiter, calling to tell my parents my score on the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery test (I took it in high school to get out of class): "Your son has some of the highest scores I've seen. Except....on the 'mechanics' section."

    My dad: "What'd he get?"

    Recruiter: "A 15. You know, sir, the average 11th grade girl scores a 45."

    My dad: "That's higher than I would have thought he'd score."

  101. I am... by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..Klingon, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:I am... by fgb · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be: Klingon! I will kill you where you stand for your insolence!

  102. Re:Sounds like fun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You fail to recognize that the whole affirmative action thing is not intended to punish the majority or discriminate against any one group, nor is it meant counter the inabilities or shortcomings of minorities and women. These people do not need crutches. Rather, it is to counter the preconceived notions and preferences of the people in positions to HIRE!

    and PLEASE don't tell me that the top echelons of the US workforce are balanced and diverse and PLEASE don't tell me that the top echelons of the US work force are filled with the most qualified people. You'll make me feel like I wasted my keystrokes.

  103. Re:Lemme get this right by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

    So sexism and racism just disappeared immediately when women got the vote and segregation ended?

    The reson for afirmative action is not payback. As applied to education, the idea is to expand the number of minorities and women who get an excellent education. After enough of them do, there will be a critical mass that means we don't need afirmative action anymore because a brilliant black woman scientist will be just a scientist. The same thing can happen in other areas.

    As a white male I don't like afirmative action, but I don't have a better alternative, and ignoring inequality doesn't make it go away.

  104. inuits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what does this have to do with taxes?

  105. waterloo, isn't my school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm...are you insinuating that girls avoid going to school with alcohol and partying. Are you stupid. Why do you think that everytime the top ten party schools list comes out, that school suddenly has a rise in admissions for both males and females. Ussually state schools with 40 times as many girls as our school are the worst schools, for rape, and public indecency.

    Look at our record. Despite being in Flint, there has never been a charge of public indeceny or sexual harassment within my alma mater.

    1. Re:waterloo, isn't my school by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      No, I'm insinuating that girls avoid going to school with drunk and partying GEEKS :) Not that there's anything wrong with geeks, in fact quite the opposite. But convince a 19 year old woman of that.

  106. racism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm..this sounds to me like they will select one race over another, that's racism.

  107. Re:Sounds like fun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [AA]is to counter the preconceived notions and preferences of the people in positions to HIRE!

    Natural Selection will do that quite nicely.

    If Company A refuses to hire the best people because they are not the right 'type' of people, then they will end up with second-best (if not third- or forth-best). Another, non-prejudiced company will hire the best people, and will be the better company for it. Being better than Company A, they will run Company A out of business.

    Yes, that is an extremely simplistic example. But the theory holds true. It may take some time, but racist and sexist companies are slowly declining, or becoming non-racist/sexist.

  108. Re:Lemme get this right by jgerman · · Score: 1
    I agree, for the most part, it is a necessary evil. However, continuing to politically point out differences as if they matter is something that keeps division going strong. I have no problem with anyone of any race getting a quality education, but based on merit, not on skin color. It's demeaning and disrespectful; it's unfair to both sides.


    It's a touchy subject, one that tends to push people to argue one extreme or the other, a bad trait that I know I'm subject to. To be honest I've argued the extremes on both sides, only to balance out the extreme argument I hear from someone else.


    You're right, ignoring inequality doesn't make it go away, but highlighting it doesn't either.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  109. Insufficent diversity? Don't Brits count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If cultural diversity is the issue then why
    did they feel the need to do a redundant
    American version with the same challenges
    but all the British hosts and contestants
    replaced?

  110. Re:Sounds like fun, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would apply, but I'm not black, I'm not gay, and I'm not a woman. So its futile, since I'll be discriminated againts 3 times before they even check to see if I'm qualified.

    They didn't say that it would be a factor in their decision making - only that they wanted a broader range of applications.

    That said, since they also want to broaden their range of team members, it could still be a factor in their decisions. This isn't employment where you may want the most technically qualified applicant. If you're interesting enough to get on it before you'd still have about the same chance now - they're not going to pass you by for some incompetent boring black woman just to meet some self-defined quota, at the expense of an entertaining show.

  111. Duh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To make the job more harder. It adds to the confusion factor.

  112. clone it by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Wonder what you'd get if you crossed 'Junkyard Wars' with
    'Monster Garage' and 'Robot Wars'.

  113. People Need Rolemodels - Even Geeks by jblaze · · Score: 1

    As white people it's sometimes hard to understand this, but as humans we do look at skin color. If you deny that and say you are "color blind", you're not being completely honest with yourself and you are not acknowledging that people you know base things on race. Things like where they live (Chinatown), what shows they watch (on UPN), who they date, etc. So if you admit that race is a factor in society (black people certainly didn't invent the concept of race) and people are visual beings, what we see on TV affects how we think about things.

    There are kids out there that watch the show but never see anyone that looks like themselves or their dad and could possibly think, I guess this show is not for me...how could I ever do this?

    The show makers are saying, let's make a better country and have the most amount of engineers possible one way we can try is by putting people that look like our viewers on the screen.
    I don't see what is so threatening about this. Diversity is not a zero-sum game. Including more people doesn't mean we have to exclude others. OMG, maybe we could even have a team with white and black people on it. Instead of people seeing it as the show makers looking for a "black team" or a "gay team". People that are suggesting these situations are the end result, obviously take race into account when they think about things, whether they admit it or not.

  114. MOD PARENT -1, Fucking Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine a Baywatch Cluster of those!

  115. You've, um, watched this, right? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    It's not about good engineering. It's about great real-world hacks using Oxy-acetylene, duct tape, and whatever else you can lay your hands on. Typically the machines they build need to last all of about 20 minutes anyway.

    It's also the logical spinoff of MIT's engineering competitions, where engineers got a box of junk and need to build a robot or a submarine or something.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  116. Re:Junkyard Wars is in decline... but can be saved by big_gibbon · · Score: 1
    to some degree in season 6 (all British imports of the renamed "Scrapheap Challenge" with Robert)

    *Coughs politely* Er . . . renamed? It was Scrapheap Challenge originally, y'know . . .

    P

  117. Re:Junkyard Wars is in decline... but can be saved by Darlington · · Score: 1
    What I was trying to say is that the Season 6 episodes shown in the US were "Scrapheap Challenge" episodes rebadged as "Junkyard Wars" (as were the early seasons), as opposed to the Season 5 and 7 shows which were originally filmed in the US as "Junkyard Wars" and intended specifically for the US audience.

    Does that clear things up? (And was that was the only thing you had to say in response to my Post Of Epic Proportions?)

  118. Try again by tonedevil · · Score: 1

    "You cannot apply one set of rules to everyone and a different set of rules to yourself"

    Actually if it is your damn show you can apply any set of rules any way you want. Like you have freedom of the press if you own a press. Also what the hell is up with comparing who gets to particpate in a "Reality" TV show with trial by jury and piloting airliners, if the show is that important to you seek help, soon.

  119. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    It is now quite lawful for a Catholic woman to avoid pregnancy by a resort to
    mathematics, though she is still forbidden to resort to physics and chemistry.
    -- H.L. Mencken

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...