Slashdot Mirror


MS Youth-Culture App Gets Gushy Advance Reviews

geo writes "Newsweek first reported this new Microsoft beta, threedegrees. The surprise is, Steven Levy, well-known fan of the Macintosh (and unfan of Microsoft) wrote something almost entirely positive. So did CNET news.com.com.com.com.com. Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?"

409 comments

  1. Nothing's so good... by jemnery · · Score: 2, Troll

    that it justifies this: "To use threedegrees, prospective testers must be running Windows XP with Service Pack 1, the new peer-to-peer update and MSN Messenger 5 installed on their computer."
    No thanks.

    1. Re:Nothing's so good... by kahei · · Score: 1

      Ohhhhhh, so it's impossible for a sane human being to run it. They should have said higher up the page.

      Jeez, talk about bad documentation.

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    2. Re:Nothing's so good... by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
      that it justifies this: "To use threedegrees, prospective testers must be running Windows XP with Service Pack 1, the new peer-to-peer update and MSN Messenger 5 installed on their computer."
      No thanks.

      In the case of MSN Messenger, they're using existing protocols and applications - which, in the spirit of code re-use, is a good thing.

      Since MSN Messenger is for windows, that would explain the Windows requirement (although admitidally no 2000?). SP1 is an interesting one - maybe something in it is required - or maybe they're just using it to presuade people to run the fix. I don't know.

      Finally the P2P update. Well that makes sense really.

      I know this is a pro-Linux, anti-Microsoft site (you can say what you like to disagree but the comments made by the owners are definately that way and the icons imply the same) but come on, if the requirements had been:

      Requires Linux 2.5.62 with KDE 3.0 and peer-to-peer upgrade.
      (with the subtitling that it doesn't run on windows)

      Would someone have made exactly the same comment?

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    3. Re:Nothing's so good... by cranos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No the first twenty replies would have gone along the lines of "KDE? Why would you use that Gnome is way better" "No its not" "Yes it is" "Well you suck" and so on and so on.

      Never underestimate the geek ability to concentrate on the minute at the expense of the bigger issue.

    4. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Equally, if they said Win 98SE is required, half /. would sound off about security... oh wait...

    5. Re:Nothing's so good... by khuber · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Since MSN Messenger is for windows, that would explain the Windows requirement

      Most IM systems are OS agnostic. Do you think MS will publish their protocol?

      Finally the P2P update. Well that makes sense really.

      It only makes sense when everything is "part of the operating system," i.e. it doesn't make sense since this P2P stuff is used only for three degrees. It may be a good idea to have a P2P OS service in the long run, but P2P protocols really haven't standardized. IIRC Clay Shirky had a good article about lack of standardization being a good thing right now.

      Requires Linux 2.5.62 with KDE 3.0 and peer-to-peer upgrade. (with the subtitling that it doesn't run on windows) Would someone have made exactly the same comment?

      No, because in all likelihood the Linux app would be open source and not subject to all this proprietary vendor lock in bullshit that MS is famous for.

      -Kevin

    6. Re:Nothing's so good... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually XP is pretty good on the stabilty front. I've had a few crashes but they're almost exclusively related to my soundcard driver, which is a shit piece of code and totally unrelated to microsoft. I dunno tho, this thing seems kinda stupid. And I'm part of their target demographic...

    7. Re:Nothing's so good... by nemiak · · Score: 1

      Duh, the difference isn't "Linux is good and Windows is evil" - the difference is "Linux 2.5.62 with KDE 3.0" is free software.

      /bite

    8. Re:Nothing's so good... by TheIronDuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I know this is a pro-Linux, anti-Microsoft site (you can say what you like to disagree but the comments made by the owners are definately that way and the icons imply the same) but come on, if the requirements had been: Requires Linux 2.5.62 with KDE 3.0 and peer-to-peer upgrade. (with the subtitling that it doesn't run on windows) Would someone have made exactly the same comment?


      I would if i had to pay for the 2.5.62 kernel or KDE 3.0

    9. Re:Nothing's so good... by benbobaggins · · Score: 1
      The requirement for WinXPSP1 is pure marketing, I'm pretty sure that there is no technical barrier running the program on Win2K

      I wouldn't be too sure about this. MS made new api calls available in xp, and probably in sp1 as well.

    10. Re:Nothing's so good... by Surak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SP1 is an interesting one - maybe something in it is required - or maybe they're just using it to presuade people to run the fix. I don't know.

      Or maybe they want to ensure that people are running non-pirated versions of XP. :-P

    11. Re:Nothing's so good... by frp001 · · Score: 1

      Well, he, at least can spell his name.

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    12. Re:Nothing's so good... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and they probably used them in this program for no reason other than to require you to update. They're probably things that they could have easily lived without. As a friend once told me, "WinXP was actually a functional product! Microsoft must have messed up! It WORKED! Then they put out sp1."

      ~Jon~

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    13. Re:Nothing's so good... by frp001 · · Score: 1

      So why not just make a service pack to run on 2K also?

      --
      May I use your sig please?
    14. Re:Nothing's so good... by jorleif · · Score: 1

      It only makes sense when everything is "part of the operating system"

      This might be very much offtopic, but this is actually one of those things that actually makes windows usability better: Integration. There are standard services for certain tasks. Even though the libraries have not stabilized yet, why not deploy them as a part of the operating system (or call it distribution if you like that word better). It is evil only in the case it creates security holes ala IIS or cannot be removed ala DirectX.

    15. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, MSN Messenger isn't just for Windows, it's available from Microsoft for MacOS X (at least) as well...but that's not really relevant.

      As for a Linux X with KDE Y etc. requirement...well, in the Unix world, applications that can only run on one system are far from well-respected. Even KDE-specific applications don't require that you're actually using KDE, just that you have the libraries.

      Almost all software I care about I could run on MacOS X, Linux, *BSD, Solaris, Tru64, HP-UX and Windows.

      I don't like software to require me to have foo and bar with no good justification, even if I do have foo and bar.

    16. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same goes for Windows 2000. People need to learn new anti-microsoft quotes or they'll be left behind!

    17. Re:Nothing's so good... by walt-sjc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Me thinks that you do not understand opensource, or Linux in general.

      First, we WOULD bitch if a user-space app required a development kernel. User space applications should not care WHAT kernel is running. I can run the LATEST version of apache on a Very old kernel - like the 2.0 series or even older.

      Second, virtually ANY open source app can be "backported" to older systems / libraries. What happens with binaries that are dynamically compiled is that they can be tied to the version of libraries that they were linked with. This can be somewhat mitigated by static linking which is what apps like Netscape 4.X and Acrobat do - this allows them top run on ANY version / distro of linux.

      Exceptions to recompile-and-run include Kernel Space stuff such as NetFilter which is pretty well integrated into the 2.4+ version of the kernel. Even this is not a hard-and-fast rule as subsystems like USB 2.0 support have been backported from the latest 2.5 dev kernel to 2.4 production.

      So yeah, the WinXP SP1 requirement shows that MS does NOT "get it". It's the continual forced upgrades for no good reason that really pisses us off. Win2K is STILL a CURRENT platform, as it should be. MS needs to support is as a current platform. If they build a new app that needs new functionality, they should backport that functionality to W2K and any other current platform in new service pack. Hell, it's not like they can't afford to do this - the OS is their big money maker.

      The reason you buy commercial software is for support. By not backporting, MS is effectivly End Of Life-ing Win2K WELL before their official stated EOL date. Why are you giving them money again?

    18. Re:Nothing's so good... by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most IM systems are OS agnostic. Do you think MS will publish their protocol?

      Actually, Microsoft submitted the protocol to the IETF and it's all documented here.

    19. Re:Nothing's so good... by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called the .NET framework.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    20. Re:Nothing's so good... by m0RpHeus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most IM systems are OS agnostic. Do you think MS will publish their protocol?

      Umm... I'm no M$ fan, isn't it that M$N Messeneger protocol is open? That's you can see a lot of M$N clients for *nix systems, like gaim. They released the protocol years ago because of the IM wars with AOL (because AOL won't let M$N clients connect to AIM).

      And besides, isn't it that there's a group, with M$ as one of it's members, who submitted a draft (I think it's now an RFC) for a new, and open IM standard.

      --
      Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
    21. Re:Nothing's so good... by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Windows XP has blue-screened for me perhaps twice since it was released, well... over a year ago. Got it some time in September 2001. I actively use XP at least 4 hours/day in normal cases.

      I recall one of the blue screens on my home computer. It was when I used some beta video drivers for my TV tuner. IIRC, it was an Infinite Loop BSOD.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    22. Re:Nothing's so good... by Hercynium · · Score: 1

      The smily indicates you're joking... Frankly, I think that's exactly why it's required! Certainly, though, there are some major updates and enhancements to the core OS in there.

      --
      I'm done with sigs. Sigs are lame.
    23. Re:Nothing's so good... by mbbac · · Score: 0, Troll

      I thought all of the XP drivers had to be blessed and certified by Microsoft? So, whose fault is it really?

      --

      mbbac

    24. Re:Nothing's so good... by 1010011010 · · Score: 0, Troll


      Explorer on XP is a crash-happy POS. It goes downa couple of times a day. This on a brand new computer "Designed for Microsoft Windows XP".

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    25. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      User space applications should not care WHAT kernel is running.

      Actually not always true. Changes and additions sometimes expose new API's, or bug fixes change existing API's. Most (portable) applications will check for differences that may apply to them, but not all.

    26. Re:Nothing's so good... by rnd() · · Score: 1
      I thought all of the XP drivers had to be blessed and certified by Microsoft? So, whose fault is it really?

      I think it's your fault, mbbac.

      How rediculous. It informs you when a driver hasn't been signed by Microsoft and warns you of the potential consequences, but it doesn't stop you from installing it.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    27. Re:Nothing's so good... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      actually, only the older drivers are certified. It warns you about using the latest detonator drivers.

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    28. Re:Nothing's so good... by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a hardware problem to me. I am running XP on an Athlon 1.2 Ghz machine, Geforce 4 MX460 with svideo in/out composite in/out and dvi and RGB out, as well as soundblaster live card, and the only problem I have had with XP was when I had a stick of SDRAM 133 go bad and it corupted the registry, but I took out the bad stick and ran winnt32 /unattended and it reinstalled windows with all of my previous settings and programs still in place. It was quite nice, I was surprised. I was dead set against going XP originally, but I wanted to play a couple of games that ummm...well didn't run in my redhat 7.2 so I slapped it on my computer and am pretty happy.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    29. Re:Nothing's so good... by diablobynight · · Score: 1

      well, no point in being a troll, so please don't go balistic here. But I am actually sure that they want you to go to service pack 1 because of stabilizing p2p. Maybe the requirement of XP is marketing, I don't know, but i don't see how them requesting you download, a free update is marketing? Oh and I use Linux, and some programs in the past have required a kernel update. Which is good, if everything can run on the old shitty kernels your not driving forward with new development, just like I don't expect everything new to run on my old solaris box. I think pushing people to upgrade can be good for the computer industry as well as for us computer users who then get to benefit from huge price drops on slightly old processors and hardware.

      --
      Anonymous Cowards - Oh God, How I hate you
    30. Re:Nothing's so good... by iamweezman · · Score: 0
      The truth of the matter is, if you can't get Explorer to work for you - which is pretty much sit back and do nothing - how did you learn how to post?

      I've had linux crash on me as much as I've had XP crash on me. Sure, it's still windows and there's problems with it, but you need to figure your hardware out, before you start blaming a simple and stable product that my grandmother could figure out.

    31. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry sir, but you didn't call M$ evil or go on a tirade about Bill Gates, and the moderators will soon be around to mod you down 10 points for saying something that wasn't driven by a prejudice, and is backed up with truthful information. I am always happy to see open minded people like yourself in slashdot.

    32. Re:Nothing's so good... by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While this is technically true, Microsoft did a very crappy job detailing this protocol. Several key steps and improvements in the protocol are not detailed, and that document is ridiculously out of date. I've tried emailing the original programmers to try to find a document that accurately described the protocol, but none of them took responsibility for it at all.
      Basically, Microsoft really only released that document to try to make AOL look bad and help promote their own instant messenger. But the document doesn't give you nearly enough information regarding the protocol if you were to write your own MSN client....it's a start, but there's a considerable amount of reverse engineering involved.

      --
      "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    33. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that STILL, almost knocked me down, be careful when yelling at someone, try to only yell important words. You know though, I am not sure their OS is their biggest money maker, the office suite may be very close, because it costs so much more. XP is different from 2000, maybe it was buggy in 2000 and didn't want people to bitch that another program was buggy, like the games in my redhat distro that have graphics equivalent to pong but still run like crap on my athlon 1.2ghz.

    34. Re:Nothing's so good... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      Wow, you're a moron.

      XP isn't crashing, explorer.exe is. That's not a web browser. That's the file manager/desktop/taskbar program.

      I suppose that because this is a new Athlon XP 2400 made by HP that came with XP installed on it, it's all your fault. I mena, HP's fault. I mean, Microsoft's fault. Your grandmother could figure that out.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    35. Re:Nothing's so good... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      The /unattended trick is interesting.

      XP isn't crashing, explorer.exe is. That's not a web browser, or the OS. That's the file manager/desktop/taskbar program. This is a new HP that came with XP pre-installed.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    36. Re:Nothing's so good... by Jeffk67 · · Score: 1

      Saying "XP isn't crashing explorer.exe is" is kind of like saying linux isn't crashing bash is.
      It may be technically true but it doesn't do you a damn bit of good since explorer is the default shell. I don't know if this still works but in win 9x you could change the shell to progman, the old win 3.1 shell. I used to have some fun at my coworkers expense this way.

    37. Re:Nothing's so good... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      Windows XP has blue-screened for me perhaps twice since it was released, well... over a year ago

      RedHat has never hung doe to software on my PC, since I switched to it from Mandrake about two years ago. The only reason my computer's hung is due to a faulty motherboard. It's getting replaced soon.

      It's on more or less constantly, and has been since I got it. I use it for about 8 to 10 hours a day (includes working from home) except at weekends when I have more time for going out.

      Since I consider productivity important, anything that crashes is not particularly suitable for me (unless of course it was because I had some spare time and checked out a beta, pre-release, or CVS copy of something).

    38. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you can get all kinds of unsigned drivers running on XP, they have to be 'blessed' in order to carry the XP logo stuffs.

    39. Re:Nothing's so good... by Surak · · Score: 1

      Maybe that should have a been a half smiley ;) It was more of a HHOS.

    40. Re:Nothing's so good... by burntoutjoy · · Score: 1


      OMG! Pay?! What is this....money? It's all evil I tell you, all of it! I should be able to walk into a coffee shop, and the guy gives me a mocha for free! FFS, I still don't get this...you mean to say some developers want *paying* for what they do? Job? Puh!
      </sarcasm>

      Purlease. I hate greedy capitalism as much as every other /.er, but people need money to eat and other trivial stuff like that. I realise Microsoft are corporate bastards, but there are many companies who I would (and do) willingly give money to. If the developers of the Linux kernel want to give their stuff away for free, that's excellent, but it's not their paid-for job. There's a difference, dude.

    41. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how palladium is supposed to work too, but don't tell that to the tinfoil hat crowd here.

    42. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Never underestimate the geek ability to concentrate on the minute at the expense of the bigger issue.


      Yeah like the fact that you can SPAM anyone's E-mail address using that site.
    43. Re:Nothing's so good... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Running Kazaa?

      Got a window open in your shared files directory?

      That will kill explorer after a random amount of time. It's Kazaa doing the killing though.

      Personally taht's one of the only 2 issues I have with XP. The other being the shitty driver for my ATI Remote Wonder BSOD'ing XP occasionally (v1.2 is so-so, v1.1 is a dead box every few hours)

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    44. Re:Nothing's so good... by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's COM objects/.net/whatever mentions that this should not be a problem (because there is a versioning mechanism built in to allow things like multiple API's). So if they wanted they could be backwards compatible. It's just they think it's more profitable to force upgrades.

    45. Re:Nothing's so good... by nat5an · · Score: 1

      Win2K is STILL a CURRENT platform, as it should be. MS needs to support is as a current platform. If they build a new app that needs new functionality, they should backport that functionality to W2K and any other current platform in new service pack.

      Of course, those of us forced to support Windows at work deal with this issue all the time. Sure, they sort of support Win2k, just like they sort of support COM and the Win32 API. However, they make it difficult to find the documentation on their webpage. Ultimately, we switched our development over to VB.NET because it was just too hard to find documentation for VB 6.0 on MSDN anymore (we're a small shop and we can get away with that).

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    46. Re:Nothing's so good... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I think that by making WinXP SP1 a requirement shows that they DO get it. By "it" I mean making large wads of cash, hand over fist. Unlike Open Source, MS exists to make profits. To make profits (and they're not making more profits by your (or my for that matter, I'm still on Win2K) 3 year old purchase of Win2K), they must provide a reason for you to upgrade (stability, bug fixes, etc). The only business model that makes any real money in the real world is by following a subscription model. Yes, it's tiring. Yes, it can become expensive (just imagine if you had to *pay* for each revision of the Linux kernel, I'd bet you'd see more "I don't see what's wrong with the 2.2.x series of kernels!" arguments going on (more than usual, anyway)). However, MS makes money and makes lots of it. That's more than you or I can say. Something they're doing works, and it's not *all* from "anti-competitive" practices.

      Secondly, this could very well be an initial release. Nothing says that they *won't* backport to Win2k or even Win98.

      Thirdly, if it takes off, I give it less than 6 months before a) someone hacks the client and takes all the messy DRM stuff out or b) someone clones it ala Trillian and gives it away on the net for free.

      I don't think that not releasing this to Win2K is EOLing Win2K. Most "tech-savvy" 14 year olds can't afford a computer on their own, they're probably running a new Dell, with WinXP on their desktop, etc. They may have simply made a marketing decision. Truth is, this isn't even out yet, so we're just speculating at this point.

      Wait for a few months and then let's bitch about it, m'kay?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    47. Re:Nothing's so good... by elakazal · · Score: 1

      Got to agree there. I only use XP for about 20 minutes a day, on two different computers, mostly with Explorer, and I've had more system-hanging crashes in that 20 minutes a day than I've had in the entire time I've run Mac OS X on my iBook (going on a year and a half). I probably get a crash with Explorer (on the XP machines) every week or two.

      Explorer was crash-prone on OS X, too, when I still used it, but at least it left the system alone.

    48. Re:Nothing's so good... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1


      No Kazaa. There are some MPEG2 files (from a Replay), though. Why does Kazaa will explorer?

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    49. Re:Nothing's so good... by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that I actually run XP.

      --

      mbbac

    50. Re:Nothing's so good... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      It's something about how Kazaa handles the download files. Not sure what (I don't have a debuger installed).

      But there is a very set group of circumstances that point to Kazaa being the problem (Kinda like the Massive Memory leak in the SB Live Mixer TSR)

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    51. Re:Nothing's so good... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      There is a staggering amount of unclear, poorly written documentation in Linux and many open source projects. The number of extant HOWTO documents that are ridiculously out of date is also staggering. Try emailing some of the original programmers of many open source projects and getting them to take responsibility for it at all.

    52. Re:Nothing's so good... by rnd() · · Score: 1

      No, just that you would take the time to have the facts at your disposal before spouting FUD.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    53. Re:Nothing's so good... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Microsoft already prove in court that explorer is a part of the OS (inseperable, impossible to remove)? If explorer crashes then your OS has crashed ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    54. Re:Nothing's so good... by MKalus · · Score: 1

      Most IM systems are OS agnostic. Do you think MS will publish their protocol?

      MSN Messenger is also available on Mac and if you look here you find a nice little app called "Fire" that handles a lot of different IM Systems:

      http://fire.sourceforge.net

      Not sure if it uses the MSN Messenger or not, but I doubt it, they don't seem to require it installed.

      M.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    55. Re:Nothing's so good... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Since I consider productivity important, I use Microsoft Visual Studio as my IDE. :-)

      Seriously, there's a grain of truth in that statement... If I'd be on Linux, my productivity would go to zero since in my business, it's not an option and nothing I can do to change, unless I can convince the companies we develop software for to switch operating systems and run their only-exist-on-Windows software using Wine, and then cross my fingers. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    56. Re:Nothing's so good... by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      ... So you think that just because a company is greedy that they truely grasp public behavior, perceptions, and market conditions?

      The continual forced spiral of upgrades and increasingly draconian licensing is exactly WHY people are migrating to Linux. If they "got it", they would wake the fuck up before every country and large business in the world dumps them. As they continue to tighten and squeeze and send in the BSA nazi's, I give them 5 years before Linux eats their lunch. Just how many people do you really think are going to put up with their DRM?

      I'll grant you that this is a beta and you can't totally judge MS's intentions by this, but if you look at MS's historical actions, we ain't gonna see a back port.

      I also believe that people will (or at least try) to hack the protocol, but MS may surprise you with strong encryption that makes the DRM stick. While MS has typically not been too friendly with RIAA, they have been sending mixed messages (such as the new CD copy protection crap they are offering...) Hacking IM / P2P isn't easy when you don't have the source and the protocol is closed - just ask the GAIM people. None of the third party IM apps are as complete as the originals they try to clone.

      Note that I'm not bashing MS's products, I'm bashing MS's behavior. Bad dog, no biscuit.

    57. Re:Nothing's so good... by FrozedSolid · · Score: 1

      I'm also the target demographic. Almost none of my friends run XP. I can tell you that none of the "features" of this new app seem to have any worthwhile purpose. I know that while i'm chatting with my friends, I don't want my messaging program to interfere with things that I'm doing. And have a DJ session online? By god, I don't want to listen to that crap my friends listen to...

      --
      When all freedom is outlawed only the outlaws have freedom
    58. Re:Nothing's so good... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Win2K is STILL a CURRENT platform

      This shows that Microsfot does get it, and you do not.

      Win2k is a business platform, not meant for home use. This 3 degrees application is aimed at teenagers, at home, on broadband connections.

      I don't think that anyone would want them running this on WinME, the home release timed to correspond to Win2k.

      Oh, and requiring SP1 means that they prevent most illegal copies of WinXP from running this.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    59. Re:Nothing's so good... by Poeir · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's minutae!

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    60. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for me personally, good OS design requires modularity. if everything is "required" then you have a heap of "crap" that's why IE should be an option, as should most other parts of windows that are integrated should be optional. sure, you can have it preloaded on joe user's 'puter, but allow the option of getting rid of it, please!

    61. Re:Nothing's so good... by Tsunamio · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suspect /. readers have not been the prime demographic for anything Microsoft has released, with the possible exception of some doomsday devices.

    62. Re:Nothing's so good... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      That's IE aka iexplore.exe, not Windows Explorer aka explorer.exe

      One's a web browser, the other is the Desktop Environment (Start Menu, File Browser, etc).

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    63. Re:Nothing's so good... by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

      I use Anjuta.

      It's got all the useful parts of Visual Studio.Net that I've noticed (Folding code, syntax highlighting, "Go to definition" on the context menu), some things that VS doesn't have - like a button to jump to the start or end of the current code block, and is integrated with CVS (which we use for source control at work).

      Unfortnately, I can't get it to run on Solaris, and I think that Linux's debugging tools are not quite as good as Solaris's (Anjuta integrates with GDB just like Visual Studio integrates with MS's debugger).

    64. Re:Nothing's so good... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the continual forced upgrades for no good reason

      No good reason? Why, there's a great reason for it! To make Microsoft more money! (augh... another alliteration attack).

    65. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking dumbass and I hope you're killed by a jackal.

    66. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't read code then it sucks, no question. You always have more power when you can understand written code unless you don't have the code.

    67. Re:Nothing's so good... by Emexies · · Score: 1

      Well, though it may be closed, that hasn't stopped people from implementing the protocol in other open source programs.

    68. Re:Nothing's so good... by abdulla · · Score: 1

      This is a good site for a rundown of most of the protocol, I believe libMSN is also LGPL and there are many other sources you can find out about or use the protocol from.

    69. Re:Nothing's so good... by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      All too often, it sucks to have to read the code.

      There's certainly no quality standard when it comes to open source code. It's always a surprise. There's horrendous poorly documented code, and I've found all sorts of gems in the Linux kernal code.

      Saying you 'always have more power' when you read the code, however, is like saying you always have more power at a concert if you can read music. Most people go to concerts to listen to and enjoy the music, and don't need to know how to read it.

    70. Re:Nothing's so good... by HEX++DogMeat · · Score: 1

      SP1 only checks for a single pirated key, the one that is the most prevalent on the Internet. Anyone who used another pirate key, key generator or who followed the procedure for changing from the single banned key to another pirated key (as detailed by M$ KB article 328874) is able to update to SP1.

      --
      HEX/DogMeat
    71. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this context we are talking about cloning MS messenger not using it.

    72. Re:Nothing's so good... by unitron · · Score: 1

      Actually minute (as in small) works quite well in that sentence.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    73. Re:Nothing's so good... by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

      The two are co-mingled with each other, as is the desktop.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    74. Re:Nothing's so good... by 1010011010 · · Score: 1
      Troll? What, there's a not a "+1, true" moderation option?


      Explorer on XP is a crash-happy POS. It goes down a couple of times a day. This on a brand new computer "Designed for Microsoft Windows XP".

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    75. Re:Nothing's so good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but you didn't call M$ evil
      Microsoft isn't evil, it's just criminal.
    76. Re:Nothing's so good... by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Only when Active Desktop's running. And I haven't seen a box running Active Desktop in a couple of years. Only 98 came with it activated Out of the box.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    77. Re:Nothing's so good... by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Yeah which would be all fine and dandy if anyone ever bothered to get drivers signed. As it is nothing out there is signed.

    78. Re:Nothing's so good... by rnd() · · Score: 1

      You do have a point. I think Microsoft should create a slightly greater incentive for hardware companies to get their drivers signed. One benefit would be that the driver would come with every Windows CD, but other than that the only real pressure Microsoft has is to make it difficult to run unsigned drivers. Sort of a catch-22.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    79. Re:Nothing's so good... by pozitron · · Score: 1

      Wel, wait as long as you like wherever you are, but in Scotland (UK/Europe/East of NY State) the kids are either SuSe8.1 or RH 8.0 (I know, I help the schols migrations from Mac/Win). XP appears to be a difficult GUI, we find KDE 3.0+ better for 'basic it user skills' users and above.

      So stow this XP nonsense ;)

      P

  2. Trick question by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Nothing's so good...that it justifies this: "To use threedegrees, prospective testers must be running Windows XP with Service Pack 1, the new peer-to-peer update and MSN Messenger 5 installed on their computer."
    No, but many gullible users will install them regardless just to test MS-threedegrees and then forget or be unable/unmotivated to uninstall the cruft.
    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  3. Misquote in the article. by t0qer · · Score: 1, Informative


    "But when Willy Wonka met Charlie,"
    Savage says, "he didn't say, 'You can be an intern and in a few years can
    suggest one feature in a product'--he gave him the keys!"


    No he said:


    Just over there.

    Charlie bucket.

    Well, well, charlie bucket. I read all about you in the papers. I'm so happy for
    you.

    And who is this gentleman?

    My grandfather, grandpa joe.

    Delighted to meet you, sir.

    Overjoyed, enraptured, entranced. Are we ready? Yes. Good.


    It's

    here




    1. Re:Misquote in the article. by YorkshireONE · · Score: 2, Funny

      When someone nitpicks to this minute level it makes me concerned for you.
      We all know charlie ended up getting the factory so why do you have to be a wise ass and....jesus just get a life or if not end yours.

    2. Re:Misquote in the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men...

    3. Re:Misquote in the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nitpicking != nonsense

    4. Re:Misquote in the article. by Servants · · Score: 1

      I am more amused that she seems to have been using this as an argument for her hiring practices.

      "No, you tired old executives, we need to hire more kids! We'd be following the business practices of the most successful chocolate factory in the world! Or do you want to end up like Slugworth?" (And it apparently worked, too.)

    5. Re:Misquote in the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! More lies from Microsoft! Is nothing sacred?

    6. Re:Misquote in the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just nitpicking.

  4. They've chosen a strange target group by z_gringo · · Score: 2, Insightful


    has been trying to develop products aimed at the "Net generation," or young people currently between the ages of about 13 and 24.

    With software that can do long distance meetings, and share files and photos, it would be a great business tool for brainstorming sessions, project planning, etc. It would also be great for distance learning applications and study groups. More and more colleges are doing Internet based classes these days, especially in doctoral programs. Too bad They didn't have those in my day..

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Diabolical · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think about it. The new generation is the generation that will make the bussiness decisions later. Get them hooked up on Windows and the future looks bright for MS.

      The current batch is still Windows minded although Linux makes quite a groundswell because the current generation likes it and uses it. So better turn them back to Windows as soon as possible. And the best way to do this is to create an application that gives them what they need. Who cares for the advantages for bussiness and educational markets. If it's good they'll buy it anyway.

    2. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Go out into the world and you'll see that real people (i.e. people who will be running the world in 20 years) don't really have the slightest idea what linux is. I know everyone on Slashdot and their friends know what Linux is and use it daily, but Joe Public MAYBE has heard about Linux from a friend of his who is a CS major. If I were Microsoft, I'd be a lot more worried about Apple right now. Apple is making REAL inroads-- especially with the "NetGen." I can't tell you how many iBooks I see on campus. And people are happy with them.

    3. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Think about it. The new generation is the generation that will make the bussiness decisions later. Get them hooked up on Windows and the future looks bright for MS.

      And how would this be any different with advocates pushing Linux into universities and schools and the such?

      Sure, there is the whole licencing issue, privacy and the like - but at the same time Linux advocates also understand that if you introduce technology to the younger audience, they'll grow up using it and making business decisions later in life basing their experiences on it.

      I can't see any problem with MS aiming for the 16-24 year group. It's not like everyone else isn't allowed to.

      --

      On a side note (which actually relates to another persons comment), I do think that likening Microsoft (or any company for that matter) to crack dealers is not the best advocacy tactic to employ. Especially if you want the people who really make the influential decisions to listen to you and not assume you to be some 14 year old school kid.

      I know ESR did it a while back in one of the Microsoft internal memos ... and he sounded like a kid too.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    4. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      I guess you're right about Apple and the NetGen. I haven't been on a campus for a long time. But regarding to Linux. In corporations Linux is making strong inroads thanks to young whizkids (yes the term is still in use.. :-). YMMV...

    5. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      If your employing someone who makes their decisions on what operating system to use based purely on the software that they "grew up with", I pity whatever company you work for.

      I use Windows XP on my desktop, because it does what I need it to, without making me jump through hoops to get to that point.

      That doesn't mean I'd reccomend that someone goes ahead and uses Windows XP as their web server, which I use FreeBSD for. It also doesn't mean I wouldn't reccomend that if all someone wants their computer for is web browsing, e-mail, and office apps they shouldn't use Linux.

    6. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Diabolical · · Score: 1

      I haven't got any problems with regards to Microsoft's motives. This is a normal bussiness practice as far as i'm concerned.

      I think that the best response to this would be a similar service running on other platforms as well instead of MS centric. But hey. I'm not targeted for this product.. im older than 24... ;-)

    7. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Garg · · Score: 1

      Actually, this app sounds just like Lotus Sametime, which is marketed at businesses (they're pushing it on us where I work). They've just taken it and marketed it differently.

      Microsoft taking someone else's idea, tweaking it, and calling it their own? I'm shocked... shocked!

      Garg

      --
      Garg
      Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
    8. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by theprancinghorse · · Score: 1

      Think about it. The new generation is the generation that will make the bussiness decisions later. Get them hooked up on Windows and the future looks bright for MS.

      The current batch is still Windows minded although Linux makes quite a groundswell because the current generation likes it and uses it. So better turn them back to Windows as soon as possible. And the best way to do this is to create an application that gives them what they need. Who cares for the advantages for bussiness and educational markets. If it's good they'll buy it anyway.

      I thought about it and I think that you are giving GNU/Linux and Microsoft too much credit. Firstly, GNU/Linux is not nearly enough of a threat on the desktop for Microsoft to begin developing apps for the youth of today just to ensure they use Microsoft in the future. I think Microsoft are just trying to exploit a market in a way that hasn't been exploited before.

      It is not like GNU/Linux is on their minds every time they start work a new application.

      I say you are giving Microsoft too much credit because given the marketshare of GNU/Linux today, I doubt they have so much foresight so as to begin work on an application from which their main benefits will be realized only 15+ years in the future. That is in essence what you seem to be saying..

    9. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      "And the best way to do this is to create an application that gives them what they need."

      I hope everyone is paying attention to what is being said....

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    10. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by bheer · · Score: 1

      With software that can do long distance meetings, and share files and photos, it would be a great business tool for brainstorming sessions, project planning, etc.

      Guess which Microsoft partner just got screwed?

      I guess Groove will soon end up like FrontPage at best and Corel at worst.

    11. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by iabervon · · Score: 1

      All of the parts already existed, according to the article. All they've done is package them in a way pleasing to this target market. You can do all of this without threedegrees, but it's too much of a pain for anybody to actually do so.

      As far as study groups, it is great for that, and MIT's had it in place for about a decade (without the file sharing, although it's only recently that people have had files in local storage they might want to share).

    12. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by TrentC · · Score: 1

      Go out into the world and you'll see that real people (i.e. people who will be running the world in 20 years) don't really have the slightest idea what linux is. I know everyone on Slashdot and their friends know what Linux is and use it daily, but Joe Public MAYBE has heard about Linux from a friend of his who is a CS major.

      And goes to their local Best Buy or CompUSA or Fry's to look for a copy. I know this because I get at least one or two new faces a week, of all ages, coming in to where I work (hint: it's one of the three places I just mentioned, out in the "real world" you claim to be an expert on) wanting to find out more about Linux.

      Many customers stop when they hear it's not a Windows-compatible OS -- they're obviously only looking for a cheaper Windows. I also get the ones who are old DOS users, or haven't touched a PC in years, that are willing to give Linux a try. It's not a groundswell of public support by any means, but I am convinced that the Windows mindshare is starting to erode among the "Joe Public" crowd as well.

      They're not all technophobes. They may be uneducated when it comes to modern computing, and feel like it's not worth the time and effort to switch to something else, but I'm beginning to think a good "consumer-oriented" Linux distro would be the one that blends a polished desktop environment (think Bluecurve) with a WINE implementation good enough to run all of the Windows-98 compatible greeting-card making / CD labelling / recipe-organizing / photo-editing programs that people I talk to daily are looking for.

      Jay (=

    13. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by z_gringo · · Score: 1

      Right. I had thought as much, which leads me to wonder, why it doesnt work under Windows 2000?

      Why limit it to XP? That doesnt make much sense to me either.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    14. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by iabervon · · Score: 1

      They want people to buy XP, probably. It isn't in their interests to give people free tools that let the stuff people already have do more useful things, if they can require people to buy new software to use the free tools.

    15. Re:They've chosen a strange target group by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Sametime is merely a very bad clone of ICQ. I use it and hate it. It's a poorly implemented IM client, and nothing more.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  5. musicmix and DRM by matvei · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The most ambitious feature is called musicmix, an online equivalent of a pajama party where people take turns playing deejay. Each group member contributes favorite tunes into a shared playlist, displayed on a dashboard with a customized "skin," and everyone listens together. A click from any participant can choose a new song. Then everyone chats about the tunes.

    Does this mean that everyone must already have the tunes licenced on their computer? The following quote suggests otherwise:

    Interestingly, men and women use this feature differently: guys will see it as a contest--who's brought the coolest tunes?

    Sounds a bit like P2P on a tiny scale to me. I wonder how this fits in with Microsoft's DRM schemes...

    1. Re:musicmix and DRM by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 1
      The most ambitious feature is called musicmix, an online equivalent of a pajama party where people take turns playing deejay. Each group member contributes favorite tunes into a shared playlist, displayed on a dashboard with a customized "skin," and everyone listens together. A click from any participant can choose a new song. Then everyone chats about the tunes.
      Does this mean that everyone must already have the tunes licenced on their computer? The following quote suggests otherwise:
      Interestingly, men and women use this feature differently: guys will see it as a contest--who's brought the coolest tunes?
      Sounds a bit like P2P on a tiny scale to me. I wonder how this fits in with Microsoft's DRM schemes...
      If you view the demo that's linked from the MSNBC article, it says:
      Just like at a party, if you leave, your music leaves too. And you can only be at one party at a time.
      So the 3degrees software doesn't by itself allow file swapping, just limited sharing.
    2. Re:musicmix and DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't *transfer* my music to your computers, it merely *plays* the songs through everyone's speakers. when i disconnect, so do my songs.

    3. Re:musicmix and DRM by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1
      Does this mean that everyone must already have the tunes licenced on their computer?
      That's a good point. Strictly speaking, this is equivalent to broadcasting Internet radio. Whatever happened to the issue of charging royalties for broadcasting Internet radio, and would that apply in this case?
      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    4. Re:musicmix and DRM by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      That's a good point. Strictly speaking, this is equivalent to broadcasting Internet radio. Whatever happened to the issue of charging royalties for broadcasting Internet radio, and would that apply in this case?

      While technically this would count as broadcasting, I don't think this would be any more of a concern for the RIAA than putting on some music while you throw a party at your pad. Yeah, technically it's an "unlicensed public performance", but since there's an extremely restricted audience and no profit motive for the parties involved, other than mindshare for Microsoft, I doubt the RIAA would end up throwing a fuss.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    5. Re:musicmix and DRM by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1
      If you had continued reading you would have seen, ' After much negotiation, the labels OK'd musicmix' So it sounds like Microsoft has set up some deal with the publishers (which is exclusive guessing by the past) that users of 3degrees won't be sued. What do you want to bet the publishers will save millions on software licensing for a few years and in return they will pursue Microsoft's competitors who build a similar song sharing program or consumers who use any competing programs.

      On a side note, musicmix seems to be the only original thing in 3degrees. Chat programs with "avatars" that wink and frown and so on are nothing new and neither is whiteboarding, the 'shared picture' feature. Listening to a shared songlist while chatting, though, that is going to be a hit, especially when combined with bright colors and irreverent cartoons. It will be a whole new dynamic for the conversation to center around: competing for control of the songlist or trying to turn your friends onto new music that you think they will like.

      But let's watch and see if they don't use the RIAA as their personal attack dog. I think we should build an competing open source project with self imposed limits that are capped at 10 users and 60 songs then see what the RIAA do.

    6. Re:musicmix and DRM by zor_prime · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, open source precludes this. If such limits are imposed, someone will simply up the limit, or remove it from the code. And though some might choose to play by the rules, I think a sort of "tragedy of the commons" will result with any self imposed limits. Someone will always want more.

      Of course, I am not so sure that such a situation is bad, all things considered.

      .

      --
      "We all do no end of feeling, and we mistake it for thinking." -Mark Twain
    7. Re:musicmix and DRM by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Open Source projects are usually tightly controlled by one or a small number of developers, just as Linus controls what goes in the kernel. Yes a competent programmer could spend the effort to increase the limit but the official site for the project could distribute only the capped version to stay out of legal trouble. Many projects do similar things now or have in the past such as with the RSA cryptosystem before the patent expired or with the readonly attribute in pdf files for xpdf or the current situation with mp3s in xmms.

      It could be argued to a judge that sharing songs with a limited number of friends online is the same as playing a CD for them when they are in the same room with you. I suspect this was MS's line of reasoning and the RIAA made the concession because it is such a gray legal area. Let's let MS set the precedent and stay behind them for cover.

  6. There's a difference between being a skeptic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?"

    Uh. I know that MS bashing is second nature here and all...

    However I really enjoy using XP. I enjoy using my Intellimouse Explorer. I enjoy several Microsoft games.

    I appreciate having people out there who watch every step MS makes. However I think it's taking it a bit far to imply that MS NEVER does anything right.

    1. Re:There's a difference between being a skeptic... by OneEyedApe · · Score: 1
      Any note worthy games I have seen bearing the microsoft name actually came from people at Bungie, Ensemble, Sega, etc. The hardware is also handled by someone else.

      I will admit that XP does appear to be far more stable than previous versions (3.1, 95, 98, ME is what I've used before), but the extraneous garbage I continue to run across when I go poking around the OS, not to mention the roadblocks, do get quite frustrating. Lately the only use I've had for XP has been to play Morrowind or something like it.

      Personally I consider what I have seen of actual Microsoft products to be overall of dubious quality.

      --
      Life sucks, but death doesn't put out at all....
      --Thomas J. Kopp
    2. Re:There's a difference between being a skeptic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. I know that MS bashing is second nature here and all... However I really enjoy using XP. I enjoy using my Intellimouse Explorer. I enjoy several Microsoft games.

      You're welcome to your opinions, of course. Just realize they're not shared by everybody.

      I've never found a Microsoft OS I enjoyed using, I've never liked any Microsoft mouse I've used, and I don't think Microsoft's games are any fun. YMMV.

    3. Re:There's a difference between being a skeptic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However I really enjoy using XP.

      No need to read any further, your credibility has been destroyed right here.

  7. Just to nip it in the bud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Please, nobody talk about the poster's bias against Microsoft.

    Remember, Nobody cares whether you hate Microsoft or not.

    Nobody cares whether you were offended by the poster's tone with regards to Microsoft.

    Please, talk about the subject of the fucking post for a change.

    1. Re:Just to nip it in the bud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares whether you hate Microsoft or not. [...] Please, talk about the subject of the fucking post for a change.

      You must be new here.

  8. Oh joy another virus vector by cranos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just RTFA and I cringed when I saw the bit about the instant sharing of files and images to the entire group. Crap like this is going to play havoc with business networks.

    Also it seems to me that MS is getting a little confused, aren't they meant to be sucking up to the RIAA? If so whats with the music sharing?

    1. Re:Oh joy another virus vector by brain159 · · Score: 1

      Then the workgroup administrator should simply not let his/her users have the permissions necessary to install it. If they need to install apps on their own, don't give them the permissions to install system components like the p2p widget that threedegrees relies on.

      If, otoh, you don't feel like setting up your systems to match your desires of them, that's your problem.

    2. Re:Oh joy another virus vector by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      If I could do it in a one line command like I can in Unix rather than running around to 500 machines then I would do that....unfortunatly it is not so.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    3. Re:Oh joy another virus vector by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Just RTFA and I cringed when I saw the bit about the instant sharing of files and images to the entire group. Crap like this is going to play havoc with business networks.

      You're absolutely right. It's fortunate that people haven't been sharing files, spreading viruses, and wasting corporate/university/other bandwidth for the last half decade or more using ICQ, AIM and predecessors, Kazaa, Morpheus, Napster...Yes, it runs on a proprietary operating system, and yes, it requires the installation of software that most of /. probably don't like. (I know I don't like Messenger, and try to kill it on every machine over which I have control.)

      Quite frankly, it seems that Microsoft may well have had some new people do something that's actually innovative (well, maybe). It certainly sounds like a very intuitive interface. Moreover, it is something that the target market might be interested in.

      This is what software development is supposed to be about! Make a product that people like, and that does what they want. Kudos to Microsoft if they're trying to do that. There are lots of legitimate reasons to bash MS--save the petty remarks for when they are appropriate. (Windows XP comes to mind.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Oh joy another virus vector by bmajik · · Score: 1

      why would you think that MS is sucking up to the RIAA ?

      If the INDUSTRY (thats MS, Intel, and others) dont create the technology specification for things like TCPA and Palladium, then the RIAA will and will make circumventing it illegal.

      Which do you want ? Technology solutions without legal authority, or bullshit that comes with the requirement of federal prosecution and jailtime ?

      Put another way - MS doesn't want the RIAA's shit in its software.

      (And as much as anyone dislikes MS, surely you dislike the RIAA _more_)
      (And as bad as you think MS software is, have you USED the stuff put out by RIAA types ? look at what happened to the lyrics websites with that TERRIBLE java applet you have to use now...)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    5. Re:Oh joy another virus vector by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      Also it seems to me that MS is getting a little confused, aren't they meant to be sucking up to the RIAA? If so whats with the music sharing?

      Did you RTFA? DRM is in effect, yo.

      ThreeDegrees client pulls the MP3s/WMAs as a stream; making them allegedly uncopyable.

  9. Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by SerpentMage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Take a look at Avril or at Blink 42. These are not people from a generation who wants to adhere to society. Consider the following quote from the article:
    >>>
    After much negotiation, the labels OK'd musicmix, once Microsoft agreed to somewhat hobble its features. (Playlists have a maximum of 60 tunes, and the songs won't play unless the original owner is participating.)

    This is not how it goes. While this stuff might be interesting for the 8-12 year olds, beyond that they will be savy enough to figure out how to do things on their own.

    MS while the intention is good is also misdirected. They want to get AOL IM client back. Last I remember the teens do not seem to use AOL since, well, its, for old geezers.... You know those that cannot use a computer ;)

    If MS were to stop worrying about the legal implications and stopped looking over their shoulder then maybe this 3degrees will be popular....

    --

    "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
    "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    1. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by LeiGong · · Score: 4, Funny
      GEEZER ALERT! Psssssh. Everyone knows Blink 182 or (to the old folks Blink 42) is no longer in. That band Sum 41 is totally hot and was even cooler when they performed on TRL! OH MY GOD!!!! And the Bizzy D is like a total hottie! *faints*

      What was I saying? Oh yeah, like all of my friends are on AIM. You don't have to use AOL to use AIM, I'm no computer dork and even I know that! Only losers use all the other stuff! DUH! Like all those geeks that surf for porn in class use MSNMessenger or IRC, I'm not even going near that! And since I don't get my own cellphone like Amy or Kelly, my stupid 'rents are forcing me to use AIM to talk to all my friends. This 3degree thing could really make hanging out online like totally easier. It's not like we have cars or anything that we can drive to our friend's houses with. :(((

      Dang, gotta Brenda is having like a total breakdown over her break up with Steve. I never did like Steve...

      ttfn! ^_^

    2. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by flokemon · · Score: 0

      Avril, Blink 182 etc are good marketing tools to make kids who think they don't want to adhere to society, effectively adhere to it.

      This is probably not a bad idea from Microsoft to indeed try to ensure a new generation uses their products, however the IM market is absolutely bloated, you've got your friends on AIM, those on MSN, those on ICQ etc. (Tip, drop them all, just keep those on IRC ;) Do people really need yet another protocol? The market seems to be going more for clients such as Trillian incorporating several protocols. Will it really be anything more than a MSN replacement?

      Targeting another market, Lotus's new Sametime client (or has it changed name too?) is meant to be quite good and incorporating many features as well.

    3. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by mattACK · · Score: 1
      My buddy's 15 year old daughter is completely and totally subservient to AOL IM. She also uses Yahoo! IM. I don't think she has MSN Messenger installed.

      She is the target audience, and I can tell you, she is going to eat this with a spoon.

      --


      "My God, this must be a truly remarkable corn chip, to be so widely and confidently touted."
    4. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by SteveX · · Score: 1

      >If MS were to stop worrying about the legal implications

      Hah, bankrobbing would be more popular and a profitable business model if you were to stop worrying about the legal implications...

    5. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by Guppy · · Score: 1

      "Dang, gotta Brenda is having like a total breakdown over her break up with Steve. I never did like Steve..."

      Yes, I heard AOLTimeWarner is having similar feeling about Steve, too.

    6. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by cristofer8 · · Score: 1

      And actually, while very few teens use AOL (at least the ones I know), almost all of them use AIM (teh standalone im client). No one user MSN messenger or yahoo. All teens use AIM since all their friends use AIM. It will take some killer app (like this) to get them to move. Of course, this will get them to use MSN messenger with these 10 friends, and AIM with all the others, but once everyone has both, maybe MS can convince them to just use MSN Messenger...

    7. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by Uart · · Score: 1

      I can second his claims, its true, teens use AIM. They just do.

      Instant Message/Chat networks can only draw in users if someone they want to talk to is allready using it.Trust me, the "cool" kids are probably not going to be the ones to experiment with some new software. So this will die.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    8. Re:Not bad, but it sounds too sanitized.... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Fine I am geezer and like I did not pay attention to the latest name change. Well gee as if that never happened before?

      You know I could name a few "hip" bands too. But that would mean discussing things from the Techno, Trance and House scene. Sadly though this is something only popular in Europe. Using Blink N and Avril was only as a reference so that you and I actually have something to discuss. It sets a reference point.

      Now about this 3 degree thing. I remember when I was a teen and likewise with my brother. And no we did not grow up without tech. We grew up with VCR's, CD's and cellphones. The last thing I wanted was something that was sanitized by corporates. Ok I was not part of the "popular" crowd, more like head bangers, etc.

      Selling 3 degrees is like selling Michael Jackson (ok these days he is a bit wierd). But there was a time when people thought he was SO COOL. Sorry, but Michael Jackson when he was cool was like 3 Degrees. They were corporate acts, which my crowd did not go for. Result? Michael Jackson was a pervert like we said....

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  10. They all fail to see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...that IRC is vastly superior to all these bloated instant messaging systems. Seriously.

    1. Re:They all fail to see.... by Puu · · Score: 0

      Go Finland! :-)

  11. Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 0
    Group members also can share photos and, more importantly, listen to music available in a common play list. Savage sees this as one of threedegrees' most important features. "Music a lot of times is the background for the fun that you have." Microsoft used the dinner party as the model for developing the size of the social group and the way music is shared within it. "It's not uncommon for someone to bring a new CD of a new band they've heard," she said. "That's a very common way for people to learn about new music is through their friends. In fact, word of mouth for music adoption is the most popular way for music to be adopted. So someone brings their CD, and when they leave the party they take their CD home with them." Group members can create play lists of 60 songs, or about the equivalent of six CDs. The songs are played from the participant's hard drive, rather than being illegally swapped. Songs can be in Windows Media Audio, MP3 or WAV formats.


    Sounds reasonable to me, although I wonder if falls under public broadcasting/performance?

    The RIAA seems to be redefining a lot of the things I took for granted in this respect
    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I just realized they might be "small webcasters" or internet rados, and they might have to conform to the rules recently established...

      In the end what's the difference between shoutcasting to 10 friends or threedegreeing to 10 friends?

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by colinleroy · · Score: 1
      The songs are played from the participant's hard drive, rather than being illegally swapped.

      Sounds reasonable to me, although I wonder if falls under public broadcasting/performance?

      Anyway if the bits go through the network the songs _are_ swapped ; the client forbidding to save the stream is just a stupid & useless "protection" - think mplayer -dumpstream.
      --
      blah
    3. Re:Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I just realized they might be "small webcasters" or internet rados, and they might have to conform to the rules recently established...

      In the end what's the difference between shoutcasting to 10 friends or threedegreeing to 10 friends?


      From the article, it sounds like they did clear this, along with the added limitations of having no more than 60 songs in a threedegree group's playlist, and the limit that the original owner of a song needs to be present. (Not sure on how they implement that, but that's what the article said).

      Sounds like it involved some negotiation. Maybe they figured it was better to have a limited product than to have something unlimited and have to face MS in court. Or perhaps the recording industry also gets some untouted benefits, such as marketing access to the threedgree groups, which has huge potential. I mean suppose Threedegree notices you have a bunch of PopBandA songs, and Sony needs to promote PopBandB...they could autoinstall PopBandB's latest single into the playlist for a couple weeks. Although that seems too diabolical and progressive for the RIAA.

    4. Re:Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      In the end what's the difference between shoutcasting to 10 friends or threedegreeing to 10 friends?

      The latter is sponsored by a multibillion dollar corporation with deep pockets who makes large contributions to bureaucrats, while the former is operated by broke college students?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Did they clear this witht the RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Group members can create play lists of 60 songs, or about the equivalent of six CDs.

      60 songs on 6 cd's? Those are some damn short CD's..

  12. .NET expands by davidsansome · · Score: 0, Funny

    We're now up to 3 degrees of seperation? ;-)

    --
    -- Wibble
  13. Somethings wrong by Oliekirk · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So you can let your friends listen to the same music and share images and all that, great. But just wait there one tiny little moment, what if they save this new copyrighted music to disk! EEK! It appears that the right hand is not talking to the left or the NetGen department is not talking to the paladium (Or whatever todays name is) department. Microsoft goes radical against piracy and violating copyright holders while microsoft encourages 13 to 24 year olds to share and enjoy there music and graphics. Even if they say you cant save because its a stream over broadband that they asume you have someone will find a way to go around. Love the two conflicting messages from microsoft. Long live Apple!

  14. Fits perfectly with DRM by kahei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...see, previously, P2P was controlled by those meddling kids. But if MS can become the maker of the biggest, coolest, easiest to use P2P sharing system... and wait, aren't they also trying to become the makers of the biggest DRM system? Could there be some synergy between those two things??

    It... it's too horrible to think about... yet...

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  15. Coming from a 15 year old... by Exiler · · Score: 3, Informative

    Crappy bands like Avril and Blink ARE teen society, right now those horrible pop-punkish bands are terribly 'in'

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by sporty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Crappy bands like Avril and Blink ARE teen society, right now those horrible pop-punkish bands are terribly 'in'


      Hey now. They do have some redeeming qualties. Yes, they are pop punk, but it doesn't mean they don't do it well.

      Look at the Beatles. They don't particularly chime anything for me as a musician. Do I like them? Not at all. But hey, they captured hearts, even in todays day and age. Madonna... great girl, all natrual and that, pop artist. Doesn't do a bad job either. Just not good to me in what I'd like to hear.

      It's all a matter of personal taste and culture. "I don't like blink182, and a thousand other people I like don't like them. Yeah! They suck!" Remember when Metallica was the shizit? Because of a lot of.. bad stuff from them lately, who would want to like them?

      Someone said it best. If someone likes it, it must be music. Probably because it reflects as something to someone somewhere. As for Britney Spears.. I don't know how that works. But that's just me :)
      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they're 'in' only because the underground punk rock scene is experiencing a great revival. emo, hardcore, ska, old-school punk... lots of bands are getting more experimental and pushing the envelope when it comes to making music. the runoff is that people start thinking punk is cool, which makes the record companies want to cash in.

      Avril Lavigne is a prime example. she gets paid to "act tough" whenever a reporter or photographer is in the area. in person she's reportedly a really sweet, nice girl. she's just a sellout, though. no self-respecting sensible teenager would really support her, as she goes against all the morals and ideals that the punk community has encouraged. i guess that's why the real punks hate her and the normal kids like her so much - she's a conformist, but a conformist who lets them tap into the image of punk and rock, without bothering them with the flak you get if you really are a punk.

      if you want to have a taste of what's been going on 'behind the scenes', so to speak, try these bands:

      Coheed and Cambria
      The Used
      Thrice
      Killswitch Engage
      At The Drive-In
      Camp Kill Yourself (you might recognize their music from the Jackass movie)
      Glassjaw
      Finch
      Mindless Self Indulgence
      Rufio
      RX Bandits
      Showoff
      Tsunami Bomb
      Youth Brigade

      enjoy.

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    3. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by thryllkill · · Score: 0
      Your namedropping is almost impressive, but I have a question? Finch? WTF? Are you serious? Might as well through Dashboard and Taking Back Sunday on your list. Emo is hardly progressive these days and is pretty much just as sold out as the rest of the pop-punk genre. I mean even Hot Water sounds kinda wishy washy now. I still love em, but they changed when they got on Epitaph or Fat or which ever major indie label they are on now.

      In defense of Blink I gotta just ask have any of you ever listened to their old stuff? I mean before Duderanch? They slowed down a little, but are still pretty much the same guys singing about the same gross stuff. I predict that if you took away the money and the fame and stuff they would still be singing the same songs and making the same jokes. It's really the public's fault they are so popular. And seriously, I would love to get paid what they get paid to suck and tell fart jokes. More power to em.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    4. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      id much rather avril and blink to nsync and the backstreet boys... just my $.02

    5. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me with this? "Pushing the envelope"? "Real punks" with "morals and ideals"?

      The envelope was burnt to a crisp a long time ago. And don't get me started on this whole "real punks" thing... that argument is older than Avril herself, but not nearly as fun to listen to. The poor girl grew up in some one-horse town and just likes to sing and play guitar. Finally she gets her first real album. Cut her some slack and see where she goes from here. At least she's nothing like those overgrown Mouseketeers and hoodrats that seem to otherwise dominate the pop scene.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    6. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by frekio · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but comparing ANY of these bands to the beatles is just plain wrong. The Beatles may have had their poppy sappy songs, but they also had plenty of musically genius and experimental yet great songs. The only way I can understand you being a musician and not appreciating the beatles is if you did not take the time to listen to their music other their poppy songs which are on the radio often today.

      So comparing them to Avril and Blink 182, who may have catchy tunes, but who don't make anything that is musically advanced, experimental, or just new and interesting, is completely uncalled for.

      Either way, what the market likes right now is whatever is popular which spreads like a wildfire and doesn't have as much to do with music as with image (the current fad is the rejection of the previous boy and girl bands). It is simpler then it seems.

    7. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by sporty · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, but comparing ANY of these bands to the beatles is just plain wrong. The Beatles may have had their poppy sappy songs, but they also had plenty of musically genius and experimental yet great songs. The only way I can understand you being a musician and not appreciating the beatles is if you did not take the time to listen to their music other their poppy songs which are on the radio often today.
      :) I miscommunicated. Not ME being a musician, but they being a musician. I left out a comma or a pronoun somewhere.

      So they experimented in something. What if the experiment failed? It doesn't stop them from being musicians and making music.

      What if Blink182's wacky antics and style become mainstream. What if they can become the father of some particular "thing" that everyone else decides to follow? Or what if they follow something that most people do. Look at early Metallica and Pantera. They both do something quite simliar, and some things quite different. Does that make their music, non-music, because they both did something different or the same?

      As for the market... it probably doesn't have the strongest correlation to what is "good" and what is "popular".

      - some arists become big after they are done while some some artists vs some becoming big while they are there
      - some are good, some are bad

      Mix and match at that point.
      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    8. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youth Brigade kicks ass.

      Avirl? Can you say Viacom? Viacom? She may do her own stuff, but don't kid yourself that she is popular because she is she. She is popular because she is pushed by one of the mega-corps. Don't be fooled by the glossy presentation.

      Is your "culture" an over the counter culture? It's OK to like whatever kind of music you like, but don't mistake pop culture for anything real. Find yourself.

    9. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by frekio · · Score: 1

      The only point I was making was that, as musicians, Blink 182 offers very little to music other than some entertaining songs. The Beatles on the other hand, created something wholly new and breathtaking. I am comparing them on musical integrity; the songs Blink 182 make do not , comparably, take much skill to create or play. Whether they father a movement or not, their style and music will not become any more advanced. Their antics are not enough to revolutionize.

      A close example is Nirvana. They created a new generation of music which was a backlash versus the pop of the 80s and early 90s. Blink 182 and Avril are doing the same except with the late 90s and early 00s. None of the bands I mention here had an excessively large musical talent, even though they all managed to create something interesting, being in the right place at the right time. You will notice that Nirvana is not around that much anymore compared to a band like the Beatles (who is still played on all sorts of radio stations, not just Oldies).

      I only took offense to you comparing the Beatles to these bands. The beatles were also pop/whatever, but they not only did it well, they also added something wholly new and innovative to the world of musical expertise. Blink182 does their thing well, but the difference between these pop punk bands and bands like the Beatles is that they will be / are quickly forgotten once their heyday is over (like the pop bands the current backlash is against... we predicted it, and it's happening).

    10. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by sporty · · Score: 1

      The Beatles on the other hand, created something wholly new and breathtaking. I am comparing them on musical integrity; the songs Blink 182 make do not , comparably, take much skill to create or play.


      Classical music tends to be a little more.. complex. Take SRV or Santana. They are a bit more complex. The Beatles didn't do anything so complex, that it isn't repeatable. As for them doing something breathtaking? Sure, why not. You like the Beatles, that's all fine and dandy. Your view of Blink182 is probably the same as mine with the Beatles.. to some extent.. just not the same direction :)

      You will notice that Nirvana is not around that much anymore compared to a band like the Beatles (who is still played on all sorts of radio stations, not just Oldies).


      Well, consider that Nirvana isn't really that old. 10 years does not necessarily make a grand oldie. Then again, Nirvana didn't do anything that a lot of the old bands didn't do already.. like Pearl Jam, or any other alternative bands may have. IMHO nirvana was only big because of the suicide thing :)

      I think the problem with comparing blink182 to the beatles is, blink182 isn't as big. While blink182 captured an age group of the US, the beatles sorta did it world wide.

      But asside from comparing apples with other fruit, and don't take offense to this, but the Beatles didn't offer much than contribute to pop music. Madonna did id. The jackson 5 did it. The eagles did it :) But you know what. They all did it in their own way. The beatles as a band, the jackson 5 as a group of black vocalists. Prince and Madonna as vocolists in their own right have done it recently. They made music that didn't require a lot of technology to warp their voices.

      If you've ever heard blink182 with just their amps, guitars and drums, they really are much better than their recordings. they have a lot of fun on stage too. Sorta like "Bare Naked Ladies" but more punk than pop. :)
      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    11. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      My point was not that Avril and Blink were the greatest examples, but at least we start a conversation?

      You see I am not part of that scene. I am more part of the Techno, Dance, House scene. And mentioning some of the groups there would not aid the discussion.....

      Is she a sellout? Fine, but at least we can discuss the issue, yes?

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    12. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      Avril Lavigne is a prime example ... she's just a sellout, though. no self-respecting sensible teenager would really support her,

      I personally derive pleasure from listening to her songs. Does this mean I am not 'self-respecting' or 'sensible'? That is what your post implies to me.

      It could be said that you are insulting me (i.e. saying I am not self-respecting or sensible) because I don't conform to what your social group deems good (i.e. acting indignant about Avril Lavigne).

      Aren't you effectively saying that if we want to be 'in on the punk scene', we have to dislike one singer (Avril Lavigne) and like others (your entire list)? And aren't you demanding the very conformity that so many punks claim to hate?

      I would be interested to hear how you reconcile this disparity.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    13. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by anim8 · · Score: 1

      Well, consider that Nirvana isn't really that old. 10 years does not necessarily make a grand oldie. Then again, Nirvana didn't do anything that a lot of the old bands didn't do already.. like Pearl Jam, or any other alternative bands may have. IMHO nirvana was only big because of the suicide thing :)



      You're a bit off ... Nirvana made grunge popular and paved the way for ALOT of bands that would never have had a contract otherwise ... BEFORE Kurt offed himself.


      Of course, they didn't invent grunge. They were themselves influenced by other Seattle bands -- particularly Mudhoney. The troubled soul of Kurt Cobain spawned some great lyrics. And Dave Grohl was/is an awesome musician. That kinda made them the Lennon/McCartney of the 90's.

    14. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by sporty · · Score: 1

      I think we could argue that one all day. I'm not particular to the music of nirvana. I like them sorta, but it's sorta like alice in chains. They have a sound, but it wasn't.. broad enough. Not like say, Dream Theatre, or Pantera who kinda stretched things out a bit in their genre. Nirvana all sounds too alike in terms of style.

      But that's my humble opinion :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    15. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by Exiler · · Score: 1

      They're 'in' becuase that's what the media are pimping right now. They don't make pop-punk music well, bands like The Ataris, Gob, etc make pop-punk music well. 5 years from no one will remember Avril or New Sum 183, they're just Backstreet Boys under a different trend.

      --
      Banaaaana!
    16. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by sporty · · Score: 1

      Like GreenDay perhaps? Everyone has their loyal followings. I'll remember blink182, just like I remember Metallica or Pearl Jam.. or Nirvana... or Stone Temple Pilots.

      *weeps*

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    17. Re:Coming from a 15 year old... by Exiler · · Score: 1

      Eh, not really a fan. They have some good stuff but nothing really spectacular like Gob - Soda or Goldfinger - Walking in the Dark

      --
      Banaaaana!
  16. Not really surprising by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

    Judging from the setup, it looked more like an ad for threedegrees than a real article. The MSN logo, the MSNBC logo, and the gushing "try threedegree's features!" link insert left me wondering how much of Mr. Levy's article got trimmed by the editors.

    Still, describing it as perfect for the Kelly Osbourne crowd is subtly damning praise. Associating a media-created star who acts rebellious for ratings with a Microsoft product...but more likely I'm reading too much into this, or crediting Mr. Levy too much.

  17. Yet more money for nothing.... by NZheretic · · Score: 5, Funny
    "To use threedegrees, prospective testers must be running Windows XP with Service Pack 1, the new peer-to-peer update and MSN Messenger 5 installed on their computer."

    [ With deepest apologies to Mark Knofler and Dire Straits ]

    "Money for Microsoft" by Dire Warnings
    Sung by Steve Ballmer, backing by Bill Gates

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    You must buy ... You must buy Win-XP

    Now look at them bozo's that's the way you do it
    You lock them always on the Win-XP
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Money for Microsoft from Dot Net usage fees
    Now that ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Lemme tell ya them guys are dumb
    Maybe get a licence on your little desktop
    Maybe get a licence on everyone

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    Look at that, look at that

    See the little Win-Troll spreading spin we makeup
    Yeah buddy thats our own fear
    That little Win-Troll got them always complain'
    That little Win-Troll makes us billionares

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    They shoulda learned to use the Linux
    They shoulda learned to use them Macs
    Look at that user, we got it stickin' to the customer
    Man we could have some fun
    And their down there, whats that? Protesting noises?
    Plannin' on me dancing like a chimpanzee
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Get the money for Microsoft get our usage fee

    They gotta install Media Player
    Passport Dot-Net deliveries
    They gotta take these applications
    They gotta take these subscription fees

    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    You lock them always on the Win-XP
    That ain't workin' thats the way we do it
    Money for Microsoft from the license fee
    Money for Microsoft from subscription fees

    David Mohring - Original author

    Note: dancing like a chimpanzee - see http://www.google.com/search?q=ballmer+monkeyboy+m peg

    If you have not already listened to, or read Lessig's speech on free culture. I urge you to do so ASAP. The flash presentation brings home just how much we, as a society in general, have to lose. http://www.eff.org/IP/freeculture/

    1. Re:Yet more money for nothing.... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 1

      Wow, those lyrics also work for "I Increase My Bust" by Lords of Acid. Just thought you'd like to know...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:Yet more money for nothing.... by syrinx · · Score: 1

      And their down there, whats that? Protesting noises?
      Plannin' on me dancing like a chimpanzee


      lol. (+6, Funny)

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  18. it's a file swapper by opencity · · Score: 1

    How long before the audio limitations are hacked? This is basically a file swapper with home based teleconferencing. If everyone's broadband, it's a movie and music swapper. If this catches on ASCAP will go after them for playlists.

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
    1. Re:it's a file swapper by dracocat · · Score: 1

      How long before the audio limitations are hacked? This is basically a file swapper with home based teleconferencing. If everyone's broadband, it's a movie and music swapper.

      I can see it now, tons of people will be buying Windows XP, upgrading to SP1, downloading threedegrees, and then run a crack on it so that they can share files.

    2. Re:it's a file swapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anyone hack it? There are bilions perfectly working p2p networks without any limitations. Nobody has to put effort into hacking some random program. Let it just fall into obscurity.

  19. Hrm.... by smagruder · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wasn't MS Bob also lauded in a similar way *before* it was released?

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  20. by next week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess this means another 10 projects on sourceforge, all in planning stage.

    1. Re:by next week by Aussie · · Score: 1

      > I guess this means another 10 projects on sourceforge, all in planning stage.

      3 will have web sites
      2 will have mailing list
      1 will have a developer

    2. Re:by next week by colenski · · Score: 2, Funny

      >3 will have web sites >2 will have mailing list >1 will have a developer 0 will have files

  21. In wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    How easy it will be to spoof being a friend on these groups. I can just imagine what kind of pictures and audio files might be sent. Porn spam along with booming voices saying "Increase your penis size NOW!"

    Sweet.

  22. Word of the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    groupthink

    The act or practice of reasoning or decision-making by a group, especially when characterized by uncritical acceptance or conformity to prevailing points of view.

    If you moderate this as offtopic, you havn't read the article.

  23. Using this kind of stuff for real work by pubjames · · Score: 1


    I've been thinking for a while about using Instant Messaging/ICQ or whatever at work. We have people working together in offices in several different countries, on various platforms. We normally use email/phone to communicate. Anyone use ICQ or Messenger? Good or bad experience? What's the best software to use?

    1. Re:Using this kind of stuff for real work by metallic · · Score: 1

      I'm currently working with a few developers across the company on a student courseware web application for an undisclosed university. Our primary means of communication is AIM, and it works out very nicely, though we can contact each other by phone and email also.

      --
      Karma: Positive. Mostly effected by cowbell.
    2. Re:Using this kind of stuff for real work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, is good, I have been using it for more that 15 years probably for real work. Far more interactive than email although it can be a waste of time..just like email, depending on how you use it. Try your 'talk" command if you have unix and other people use unix as well, or icq, msn or whatever...

    3. Re:Using this kind of stuff for real work by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 1

      My dad uses msn messenger (or whatever its called that comes with XP) to hold meetings with people from the company he works for (he's a financial advisor). The only problem is that no one involved is apt enough for everyone to get their machines to work when they want to do something fancy like teleconferencing. In his case he couldn't get the router to open the ports he needed, but there have been problems from the other side of the line as well. The technology is all there but the expertise is lacking.

      So if your thinking of implementing something like that with a bunch of non-computer savvy middle aged people without some amount tech support, forget it.

    4. Re:Using this kind of stuff for real work by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      We use Trillian at my place of work (due to the fact that it allows for encrypted communication, and it does the 4 major instant messengers AIM/ICQ/MSN/Yahoo plus IRC). It has become indispensable to talk with co-workers in other cities, people working from home and even people across the hall :P. We've even used it with one of our vendor's support engineers.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    5. Re:Using this kind of stuff for real work by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Thanks Sandman.

      I've checked out Trillian. Unfortunately it's not available for the Mac ("Fire" is similar for Mac), but we might use it on the PCs.

    6. Re: Using this kind of stuff for real work by pewtey · · Score: 1
      Anyone heard of Rendezvous by Apple? This is basically an autoconfig network app that can (and is) used as a p2p communication tool and does not require an internet connection! Are you in the room with 2 wifi-enabled computers who want to chat, or share files but have no internet? Simple, just open ichat and turn on rendezvous. If you do want to communicate over the internet, ichat (although it does utilize the AIM subscriber base) is your tool. Want to communicate with people on the internet and on a computer network? That's ok too. And what about wirelessly and automatically connecting to that printer down the hall from the meeting room? Yeah, rendezvous can do that too. It's by no means perfect, but it's already available and it's open source too.

      Here's an an article about it. Or learn about it from the horse's mouth.

      --
      i don't have a sig.
  24. Google Translation to Old Speak by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 0

    "Her smarts eventually got her to the Redmond"
    He intelligence allowed her to climb the career ladder.

    "...online equivalent of a pajama party where people take turns playing deejay"
    Has Kazaa like functionality.

    "You invite friends to form a posse"
    You invite dirty old men pretending to be little girls across the internet to come play with you're cat.

    "..the most artistic winks..."
    Winks? as in eyelid batting or are the young getting totally yorlandish and too incompsatoriallyfund.

    "..grinding skateboard tunes erupting.."
    Oh lord, make it stop!

  25. The target group is also by keller · · Score: 1
    ... unusually cruel and effective testers.

    Release it for the youth, make it work, then sell it as a general tool as suggested!

    --

    Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

  26. Re:Contradictory Behavior by cyberon22 · · Score: 0, Funny

    Anyone else find it highly ironic to find this posted right above an article about University Students being Slammed for Music Sharing?

    I'm all in favour of Microsoft pushing the envelope here!

  27. huh? by mshiltonj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Core to threedegrees is the group instant messaging

    Um, that's called a chat room, and it's been done. Way to build a product based on a new feature.

    Other stuff sound kinda interesting, but hardly revolutionary.

    Why the imposed limits, anyway? Only 10 user in a group? Only 60 songs?

    How is this different from using a Gaim/Shoutcast combo?

    1. Re:huh? by Gryftir · · Score: 1

      I'd point out that IRC program scripts can play shared music, providing the user sets permissions and has a copy of the music on their hard drive. Also, I'm pretty sure some IRC clients have visual components similar to winks. They also have no limit on number of rooms, and no DRM. In fact, with proper scripting (and scripts are downloadable) you can copy all of the functionality mentioned in the article. And they are truly cross platform.

      On the other hand they have a server client setup, and this is P2P. I guess that makes it special.

      Gryftir

      --
      http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
    2. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest difference is that this is a Microsoft marketing tool. They'll spiff it up to make it look cool and fun, and hook pre-teens on it; I have a 13-year old niece who'd eat something like this up, based on the description. It'll spread like wildfire, trust me.

      If Linux wants to go there, the pieces are all laying around waiting to be tied together with some clever, easily customizable artwork. Then an old Microsoft tactic can be employed: embrace and extend.

      Thing is, open source coders could pull this together in a weekend... but would they be able to put the necessary polish on it? With graphics that appeal and amuse? And without needing to configure the thing at a bash prompt, or worse yet, build it from source? That's more doubtful.

      This is the market that Lindows is shooting for, not Red Hat or Suse. Best thing we can do to Redmond is to build something better, then add it as freeware to the Lindows Click-n-Run library. Compatibility with 3-degrees would be a plus.

      Who's up for it?

  28. Observations by Gryftir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I think that three degrees seems in theory like a community building tool, what worries me is the limit to 10 participants in a "posse" will create in groups.

    Unless you can join multiple "posses," and what I read doesn't seem to suggest it, your going to have groups of ten or less which get to decide who can join.

    In MSNM there is not set limit to the number of people you can chat with, and you could make one on one connections. Before you could ignore a person, now you can exclude them. And if it's intended to be for 13 to 14 year olds, I think social cliques are inevitable. This fails to mention those who can't participate fully in the program, which seems to require broadband for what I personally view as the most interesting aspect, the ability to listen to shared music.

    I'm not bashing on Redmond on this. I honestly think that the basic idea of the program is meritorious, but by limiting users to ten per group, and (and I could be wrong) users to one group, the collaborative aspects are blunted.

    Gryftir

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
    1. Re:Observations by havblue · · Score: 1

      Exactly, hurt feelings all around for grade schoolers.

      Fred: Billy! Jason wants to get in! Get out of here!
      Billy: Okay, bye guys. *door closes*
      (Billy of course returns after 2 hours of waiting when someone else leaves, only to get booted again when Enrico shows up. The cycle continues...)

    2. Re:Observations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not bashing on Redmond on this. I honestly think that the basic idea of the program is meritorious, but by limiting users to ten per group, and (and I could be wrong) users to one group, the collaborative aspects are blunted.
      Well, that's fine, because this isn't collaborative software. It's social software, for use by a cluster of friends, and such clusters don't get too big.
  29. 'Focused on productivity'? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
    From the first article:
    Threedegrees is a surprising departure for Microsoft. The company that's relentlessly focused on productivity has now produced an anti-productivity tool, constantly interrupting you and urging you to waste time with your friends.
    Has this writer never heard of the Office Assistant? Or the stupid 'DHTML' scripting features which IE is so keen to support? Or window animations, or sound effects, or screensavers... the whole focus of Microsoft software is to get something that looks cool before something that works and gets out of your way.
    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  30. Fostering the next generation of social invalids by jeffwalsh · · Score: 1

    It looks to me as if this is the perfect product for all those socially inept teens out there. What a nifty way to keep them locked up their rooms while they have virtual parties, virtual dates, et cetera on their computers. All the while they are not showering, going to class, or having any sort of real human interaction beyond a computer screen with avatars based on highly exaggerated or false physical attributes. This brings back memories of the movie Lawnmower Man where the guy is drawn into the "cyber" world and has lost all touch with the real world. I'm not bashing Microsoft here in any way; I just think the idea will be a short-lived one as, hopefully, the current generation realizes that there is life beyond threedegrees, Quake III, and Slashdot.

  31. It's all about 'the kids' by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
    If Microsoft wanted to be relevant in the future, she told them, it had to adjust to NetGen, even if it meant producing software that the middle-aged guys in the room didn't care for.
    In early 2001, she set up in the hip waterfront area of Seattle--miles away from the orthodoxy at Redmond--recruiting kids barely out of college, promising them the opportunity to make an immediate impact.
    Is it me, or does the whole article feel five years out of date?
    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:It's all about 'the kids' by Queuetue · · Score: 1

      You hit it dead on. This is like a press release from 1998 - or maybe from before MS even "got" the internet.

    2. Re:It's all about 'the kids' by VargrX · · Score: 1
      If Microsoft wanted to be relevant in the future, she told them, it had to adjust to NetGen, even if it meant producing software that the middle-aged guys in the room didn't care for.
      In early 2001, she set up in the hip waterfront area of Seattle--miles away from the orthodoxy at Redmond--recruiting kids barely out of college, promising them the opportunity to make an immediate impact.


      Is it me, or does the whole article feel five years out of date?

      Well, it certainly make's me feel five years out of date

      --
      Sometimes people just have to learn and adapt to change, it is one of the requirements of being a living thing.
  32. big deal by tplayford · · Score: 0

    This allows you to:

    talk to a group of people! (wow, MSN, IRC, jabber etc has been doing this for years)

    Send photos to each other! (WOW!, I use a 'web site', simpler and cross platform)

    Listen to group music! (This is a new, ish, feature but to be honist you could all just press play at the same time (note that you can't actually share music with this thing)).

    The only 'feature' this has is a nasty MS eyecandy.

    It's 'market speak'ware, it also locks people to MS I suppose, stopping the Apple Mac youth drain?

  33. MicroSoft condoning 'music sharing' by illtud · · Score: 1
    Interesting development (from the article on news.com):


    Group members can create play lists of 60 songs, or about the equivalent of six CDs. The songs are played from the participant's hard drive, rather than being illegally swapped. Songs can be in Windows Media Audio, MP3 or WAV formats


    Now we all know that "played from the participant's hard drive" is irrelevant - obviously the music is 'swapped' or you wouldn't be able to hear it. This means that the files are streamed and that Media Player doesn't let you save them as you play them. Technically, this is no different from the 'illegal sharing' that the RIAA has its knickers in a twist about. It'll be interesting to see if they condone or condemn this, and whether MS have cut a deal beforehand.

    1. Re:MicroSoft condoning 'music sharing' by MisterFancypants · · Score: 1
      The RIAA probably won't have a problem with it, because just not including a stream-saver as part of the base software is enough to stop 99% of all people from abusing it to steal IP. Sure, someone could make a crack and put it on a website for everyone to run, but still only a very, very small amount of the total potential user base would ever use this, if it isn't a base part of the software.

      And while technically the same sort of network downloading is going on here, intent plays a larger part of the law than most computer-geeks realize.

    2. Re:MicroSoft condoning 'music sharing' by actiondan · · Score: 1

      The article mentions that they have cut a deal with the record companies already.

  34. in short, yes by lingqi · · Score: 4, Informative

    but it's still ristricted.

    1) you need to have licenses (maybe via media player DRM modules?)
    2) you can't play more than 60 songs on the playlist
    3) others can't play your songs if you are offline.

    pretty stringent - but better than what RIAA have been dealing out.

    What better to explain the word "clout?"

    btw, Ars Technica has a small writeup on this too - so check there for more geeky-perspective.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:in short, yes by mbbac · · Score: 1

      I bet the files will need to have DRM turned on in them in order to be sharable via threedegrees.

      --

      mbbac

  35. Re:Three degrees... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was the crappiest post ever.

    I'm gonna print that out and add it to my scrapbook of lameness.

  36. So..... by FaRuvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me...

    Or is this just IRC with a pretty GUI, integrated shoutcast and a channel limit of 10?

    --
    Need to get away?
    Adirondack Vacations
    1. Re:So..... by ShooterNeo · · Score: 1

      And what sounds like HUGE overhead costs. The program probably eats memory, bandwidth, and cpu like a hog. Look at how they designed it : probably by coding up the whizbang features in the highest level abstractions then getting their developer to somehow make it work.

      So? AOL is one of the crappiest pieces of bloatware I've used. It has a HUGE number of features, animated widgets, ect. I was so happy to get it off my system. IRC may be clean, tiny, and powerful but guess which will get more use? Besides, as Bill has pointed out it people needing huge amounts of computing power and bandwidth so they can waste nearly all of it running bloatware is what drives the tech sector.

    2. Re:So..... by Patrick · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Or is this just IRC with a pretty GUI

      This "Netscape" you speak of... is it me, or is it just Lynx with pretty pictures and sounds? This "Doom" you speak of... is it me, or is it just Rogue with an unnecessary first-person viewpoint?

      Never underestimate the power of a good interface. Leaving out OPs, kicking, and banning goes a long way, too.

    3. Re:So..... by smeg168 · · Score: 1

      leaveing out ops kicking and banning and setting the chan limit of 10 really doesnt help anything, first of all ops kicking and banning help you enjoy a nice relaxing time of irc, not dealing with all the stupid shit that you would have to on say.. aol chat(oh god the memories). and i dont know about you but i have more than 10 friends. In highschool me and my friends simply started a efnet channel, and we still all keep in touch on there. also why the hell does chat need a graphical interface, games i can understand web browseing i can understand. but aside from video confranceing i cant see the advantage of a gui, good old bitchx will be fine for me.

    4. Re:So..... by Uart · · Score: 1

      But in IRC, anyone can join your channel. In this program, you would be able to choose those 10 people.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    5. Re:So..... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Which is why irc supports keyword protected and invite-only channels, aswell as banlists and exemptions from bans/invites for known hosts.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  37. Read the articles carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO FILE SWAPPING IS ALLOWED by this program. It's merely p2p audio streaming (with the IM and other stuff). My music, from my computer, is played through the speakers of everyone who is active in the group at the moment. If I leave the group, so does my music. I AM NOT HOWEVER TRANSFERRING MY AUDIO FILES TO YOUR COMPUTER FOR PLAYBACK. In fact, there will be all kinds of junk in the datastream - music, pictures, and chat.

  38. For God's Sake... by colinramsay · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?"

    Is it possible that a Slashdot editor could take submissions with at least some degree of subjectivity? Whether threedegrees is good or not, this sort of opinion in the post itself surely taints the comments.

    1. Re:For God's Sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible that a Slashdot editor could take submissions with at least some degree of subjectivity?

      HAHAHA! Are you new here or something?

    2. Re:For God's Sake... by CynicTheHedgehog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean "objectivity". We have subjectivity down pat, thank you.

    3. Re:For God's Sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the kidz don't know you can't use
      Microsoft Products without being a dork.

      Microsoft can never be cool.
      That is reserved for Tux & Co.

    4. Re:For God's Sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it possible that a Slashdot editor could take submissions with at least some degree of subjectivity?

      Yet another fine example of why we need a mod (-1, Fucking Stupid).

      Honestly, if you can't tell the difference between "subjective" and "objective", then please go shoot yourself and remove your defective genes from the gene pool. Thanks!

  39. From the people that gave us .NET... by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really for a minute i thought i was going to be reading about something that was actually interesting. But no, its just another hyped up nothing. Im sure you could modify jabber to do the same useless things as this. When they talked about "not developing technology first" they wernt kidding.. theres really not much technology involved in allowing someone to send an image by draging it onto an icon, using an existing protocol/library. The music feature is the only slightly interesting thing but it restricts what you can do so its useless to me. Usually me and my friends use the technologically inferior method of typing the name of the song and getting the other person to download it. Or, ampache.org created a simple (100KB) way of sharing playlists, and its platform independent.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:From the people that gave us .NET... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell? Everyone is bitching along the lines "This could be done by combining these 4 programs, with some glue, and a couple pathces". Big fucking deal. Napster could have been done with wget, a couple shell scripts, and irc. But guess what, it didn't. Napster was easy to install, use, and ran on windows, and was not a bunch of applications duct-taped together.

      I really think microsoft might have a winner here. I take a lot of digital pictures, and I like to share them with a group of friends. I often have to hassle with uploading them to a website, or sending them one at a time over yahoo messenger. When this new program comes out, I will definately check it out.

    2. Re:From the people that gave us .NET... by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      My problem isnt that Microsoft did it, its that they hype everything they do up as if its the most incredible ground breaking technology ever invented.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:From the people that gave us .NET... by kzeddy · · Score: 1

      guess what... thats what a good marketing department is supposed to do.

  40. Microsoft Reinvents Existing Technologies... again by hacker · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Here's how the software works. You invite friends to form a posse of up to 10 participants. Representing the group on your desktop will be a colorful image, either one from a set provided by the software or something one of the group has produced. (It could even be a digital photo.) If you're online and since threedegrees assumes you have broadband, you're probably online all the time, you give your friends a holler simply by sending the equivalent of an instant message. Everyone in the group will see it. "

    Wait, you mean Microsoft reinvented... IRC?!

  41. All your peerses... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 0

    ...are belong to us!

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  42. value-Added services? by steph0 · · Score: 1

    Will there be a gang colours plug-in available?

  43. Isn't this just IRC? by IvoryRing · · Score: 5, Informative
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but reading the article makes it sound just like IRC to me.
    1. cliquey little channels? check.
    2. play music in the background? check.
    3. emoticons? check.
    4. swap files? check.
    5. chat and be online all the time? check.
    Makes me wonder if perhaps MS is glad to have seen the recent attacks on DalNET - now they can say 'sign up for threedegrees, we never get attacked because we are too cool' or some such marketspeak.

    By the way, all of the items in the checklist have both positive and negative implications.

    Notes: Background Music on IRC? Yep - on the more social/chatty channels, I've seen all kinds of CTCP or in channel requests that look like "please play this music, and if you don't have it, fetch it from me via DCC" - I'm assuming that some clients have automated support for this, and they word the request such that you can still do it manually if you really want (clue for commercial software vendors that think you need a new protocol for every new feature - it's called interoperability and backwards compatibility)

    Emoticons? But winks are animated! Um... yeah, so? Perhaps somebody doesn't quite understand yet - slang originates from exclusivity of communication, not 'ooo, shiney!'. Because you can make up ASCII emoticons on the fly, just as you can with slang, I actually think that the ASCII version is a better tool for the communication purpose. Maybe I'm giving the youth of today too much credit, but I don't really think they are willing to accept the limitation to language fluidity. So some will use winks, and some will use ASCII emoticons within the contect. Of course, I'm not sure how much the 'new great thing' factor will play into this.

    1. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by weave · · Score: 1
      I was thinking the same thing. But it might work if they don't support channel ops, kick, and bots. It sounds like it's invite only.

      But rest assured, even good friends get into wars, and sooner or later someone is going to get thrown out of a posse and then be determined that if he can't be in it, no one can, and launch massive DOSes against the network.

      Microsoft still doesn't understant the culture. They need to join an irc network and spend all day on it. Then again, for a lot of people, the irc anarchy is part of its charm. I doubt that can ever be duplicated on a commercial net!

    2. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      I don't know if they still do, but at one point microsoft ran an IRC network for thier "Microsoft Chat" application (it was also sometimes called "Comic Chat"). It was a gay, but popular for it's time, IRC client that had little comic characters interacting. We're talking circa 1996 here.

      The protocol it used was ontop of IRC, so each time you joined a channel that was dedicated to this client, you saw the protocol used to control the comic graphics as part of the chat (the client filtered it out, so you wouldn't actually see the protocol as part of the discussion if you used Microsoft Chat, but since it was still RFC 1459, you could join the server with a normal irc client and talk in the channels).

      I belive they ran it on chat.microsoft.com, but that doesn't exist anymore. The one thing I remember about it was that the IRCops on that network were call-centre scripted to only respond in certain ways. It was horrible.

    3. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by IvoryRing · · Score: 1

      So, externally this will be marketted as 'threedegrees', but when you go to Help -> About, it will be Microsoft Chat 2.0?

    4. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Evangelion · · Score: 1

      Highly unlikey, as it's not going to be IRC (i.e. you won't connect to a central server and join channels).

      It will be MSN Messanger chat (quite literally, as it will just link to the Messanger objects) with some file sharing, audio streaming and conferencing components added.

    5. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by mystran · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I also think this is not too far from IRC.

      At least here in Finland you can find pretty much all net addicts with broadband in IRC 24/7 and DCC send is already a viable way of sending files fast to someone, or when you want to broadcast you drop the file on HTTP server and send the URL to your channel of choice so people can fetch it if they want. Most people with broadband do have some extra space on an HTTP server, and real net addicts have a shell account or static IP for IRCing anyway.

      Actually this sounds more like trying to bind people to single platform, enforce DRM by allowing certain works to be broadcast to the party of 10 without allowing them to really save it.

      There's really no advantage. If you are not into IRC, you can do the same with almost any Instant Messenger, be it MS or not. Even regular mailboxes tend to be large enough for a few mp3s.

      I don't mean to flame MS for this, but really, I don't see any use, as existing cross-platform products are good for what it attempts to do without silly limitations.

      --
      Software should be free as in speech, but if we also get some free beer, all the better.
    6. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by gauauu · · Score: 1

      No they don't need to join an irc network and spend all day on it.

      I think they understand the culture better than you think. You are referring to geek culture. They are trying to hit 12 year old teeny-bopper culture. And as dumb as this seems to me, I think they are right on.

      Have you ever watched your 12 year old sister and her friends use the computer? This is exactly what they want (yes, maybe it does have the same functionality of irc, but sit your sister down in front of both of them, and see which one she'll pick. Then we'll talk)

    7. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Patrick · · Score: 1
      Perhaps somebody doesn't quite understand yet - slang originates from exclusivity of communication, not 'ooo, shiney!'. Because you can make up ASCII emoticons on the fly, just as you can with slang, I actually think that the ASCII version is a better tool for the communication purpose.

      I disagree. First, people use only about a half dozen emoticons. Second, slang is only useful if your friends understand what you're saying, so it can't be too exclusive or too innovative. And third, "shiny" sells.

      Where I entirely agree with you is that there needs to be an easy way for people to create new winks. (It just doesn't need to be instantaneous.) Animated GIFs, Flash, MPEGs, or all of the above -- I want to be able to spend a few minutes finding or crafting a new wink and then use it as easily as I can use the built-in ones.

    8. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Quarters · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fact that is is similar to IRC should tell you (and any person who writes apps for Linux) something.

      The user interface and user experience is key. Yes, this technology is like IRC. But, it probably doesn't have all of the cruft and baggage of IRC. No obscure server names to remember, no Ops, kicks, bots, channel storms, etc... Easier setup and connect, etc... The list of IRC woes is long. IRC was (is) a medium made by geeks for geeks. It's not an easy thing to understand and it's learning curve is practically vertical. The problems are a shame too, as the underlying concept of communication channels/rooms is valid and useful.

      Dynamix did a lot to clean up IRC and make it easy to understand in their Tribes2 pre-game UI. 3deg of Separation sounds like an excellent attempt by Microsoft to make IRC style communications go mainstream.

      Anyone who's ever written an IRC client should sit back and ask themselves, "Why wasn't I concerned with making IRC better instead of just making yet another IRC client?"

    9. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yes, i remember hitting #tdotrave on saturday mornings to find out about parties that night, and some dude would be shoutcasting his turntables to the room. at first it seemed like a pretty cool bunch.

      /XbOi> dude i'm like totally rushing on x right now
      /me> you're on ecstasy at 9am and you're sitting at your computer?

      / you have been kicked by @rave-on (plur dude!)
    10. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by bcombee · · Score: 1

      Comic Chat's biggest legacy is Jerk City, a gay-themed comic that occasionally mentions the products I help develop.

    11. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      No man just give me a break! The very first thing I learned to use the day I bought internet access for my win95 486 was mIRC and there's no way in hell I'll say it was difficult. I really don't think this older-than-6-month bashing attitude has any reason except that you just decided to buy the marketing crap urging to upgrade to the latest and greatest gizmo. Face it, these folks are just reinventing the wheel (and something like ICQ on pretty Luna GFX) and trying to convince the world that their design is rounder than all the other...

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    12. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Quarters · · Score: 1

      And you, as a registered Slashdot reader, automatically exclude yourself from the mass market. mIRC isn't hard to understand if you are technically inclined. If your web presence equates to clicking on the Outlook Express icon, clicking on the IE icon, and/or clicking on the AIM (or MSN Messenger) icon then mIRC is about as easy to understand as a doctoral thesis on quantum mechanics.

    13. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      @ some point in their lifes even those braindamaged users you're taking as an example will have configured outlook setting up server, uid and password fields. Of course some day in the future there won't be email any more but just hotmail preconfigured for your passport account taken from your winxp^2product activation code (universal tracking id) linked the ipv6 addresses of all your silicon gadgets. I for one, hope I'll be well into my senility dementia. Btw, last time I saw confusion in the subject was in some provider's config violating the usual UID@provider.etc (standard since the early '90 if not before) and asking for the whole address in the uid field; why? I guess some clueless manager ordered to replicate the screen-name concept to pleasantly surprise the odd customer... shame it confused all the others.
      People (with limited exceptions) aren't impermeable to learning, they just go nuts when the rules of the game get changed every patch release; eventually they give up and leave the harasser in command.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    14. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Uart · · Score: 1

      The target market for this product is 12-24 yrs old.

      I refuse to run Windows, and I refuse to use MSN Messenger. I am a college student, and I can promise that MOST of my fellow college students are using AIM, with a few users of ICQ and MSN Messenger as well, but I promise that most of us won't change. I have had the same screen name for 6 years now! Most of my friends don't change theirs at all either.

      Threedegrees will not replace AIM in their target market. Furthermore, as computer "savvy" as my generation is, I doubt they are savvy enough to really appreciate this.

      Furthermore, Microsoft doesn't want to have another "Bob" on their hand, so I doubt they will be putting much effort into marketing this.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    15. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Quikah · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sounds a lot like IRC, except it also actually sounds easy to use, unlike IRC. I don't know how many hours I have wasted trying to figure out how to do something trivial on IRC...

      Sounds like a cool idea to me.

      Do people actually make up emoticons on a regular basis? Never done it myself. Go to any web bulletin board, animated emoticons are rampant.

      --
      Q.
    16. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by captaineo · · Score: 1

      A good example of this: Why didn't the recording industry stand up and take notice of online copyright infringement until Napster came out, even though people had been trading MP3s over IRC for years? There was nothing fundamentally different in the technology of Napster and the old IRC/FTP combo. The key difference was that Napster wrapped it all up into one easy-to-use package, which increased the potential user base by several orders of magnitude. (you have to be pretty geeky to work IRC and FTP together, but just about anyone with Windows and an internet connection can figure out Napster)

    17. Re:Isn't this just IRC? by Quarters · · Score: 1

      If I had mod privs in this discussion (which I don't because I made the post to which you are replying) I'd put them here. Your example is perfect.

  44. Something wrong about copyright? by flokemon · · Score: 0

    Come on, you perfectly know that you will have to run Palladium to run three degrees, and you will not be able to save this new copyrighted music!

  45. Levy has sold out by RobotWisdom · · Score: 1

    Remember his whitewash of Palladium?

  46. Winks? by Queuetue · · Score: 1

    Ok, so it's a service where you can not trade music and use some kind of instant emoticon on each other.

    Oh, yeah - the 'Net savvy kids are gonna eat this all up. You know how they just loo-oove empty marketing. <wink />

  47. Where's the market? Where's the cash? by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well I've got two things.

    One, where's the market? I mean rilly?
    Two, this is supposed to make cash for MS how?

    news.com.com he say:

    A team of 12 recent college graduates, led by group manager Tammy Savage, has been trying to develop products aimed at the "Net generation," or young people currently between the ages of about 13 and 24.
    Well the first thing is, does this market even exist? You see such people using AIM, ICQ etc all the time. This software is junk. Do the 'Net-Gen' (sic) care? No. They have other things to do than learn any more than the most trivial UI. As for heavy teenage net users, what about this, from the other article:
    You invite friends to form a posse of up to 10 participants.
    What's with the arbitrary limitation? My kid sister's 'posse' (blech) is easily twice that big. Sounds like a mess. What are you supposed to call your group? 'J. Sixpack's buddies'? It doesn't work - that's like having gang leaders in the playground. That's not how kids do instant messaging. Is it?
    musicmix... Playlists have a maximum of 60 tunes
    Drag-n-drop ('push') filesharing is a nice idea, but the kids already know about Kazaa, especially the heavy users. For anyone with enough bandwidth to stream nice audio to 10 buddies, they're way better off getting redistributable files from real P2P and letting friends/randoms pull them back off at their leisure.

    Right, point two... well hello, profit model? Looks like this is just another MSNIM-a-like project to be rolled into the OS. I don't see this as making any legit cash for Microsoft - it's not something the kids will pay for (and it's not corporate P2P). Can we say 'bundling'?

    3 degrees might be great, especially if it has better than the usual godawful Microsoft UI. I suppose I shouldn't knock it till I've tried it (or a Linux clone...). And surely MS have got some market research to go on. But while making money out of kids is tricky (e.g. no-one likes adware), MS's strategy is obviously just to bundle, embrace and extend. And that rankles.

  48. Groove, MS redux by Begs · · Score: 1

    Groove: redux, reduced, repurposed, repackaged, remarketed and MSed. There you have it Boys and Girls.

  49. No, it isn't possible. by chad_r · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?

    From the article:

    The new software comes out of the Microsoft's 18-month-old NetGen division, which operates on a separate campus in downtown Seattle. Microsoft's main operations are location in Redmond, Wash.
    There's your answer, Timothy.
  50. Each Generation slips a notch lower by Yo+Grark · · Score: 1

    With the onslaught of technology we have gotten lazier and lazier. Children in my generation were lazier then our parents and them before that.

    Taking the inititive by MS,

    1. They stand to make sure all the kiddies continue to be late for school

    2. ensure kids are Messaging instead of homeworking

    3. Develop l33t net sp33k (ok not so bad but rememeber the recent stories about net speek making it's way into legitamate assignments)

    4. Develop a gaggle of health related issues down the road from the repetetive strains and lack of physical exercise.

    5. Continue to become socially inept through lack of human interaction.

    6. Forget the rules of conduct when dealing with real people.

    7. Insert hundreds of other uh-oh's.

    Bottom line is I am slowing realizing that just like TV or Video Games, everything has to be takin in MODERATION (not moderate those who have points :P)

    Too much of a anything is a bad thing, and I for one limit my interaction with the PC to the 8 hours I work on it, and the 1-2 hours at home I use it for finances and games.

    Whoah, I spend a shitload of time on the PC, god I can't imagine what our youth are going to be facing.

    So that's again MS for providing a clear vision into why so many "in the know" know you're evil, EVEN WHEN YOU GET GOOD REVIEWS.

    / end of rant

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:Each Generation slips a notch lower by Qender · · Score: 1

      Yes, thank you for telling me that this could be overused and if it did it should be moderated. It's a rule that applies to many things. Well, everything actually.

  51. I guess I'm old -- I don't get it. by Jonathan · · Score: 1

    I really don't get this whole "instant message" craze, but I guess it really is popular with generation Y -- I work with some 22-year old people fresh out of university and they all chat with friends (both those at the company and elsewhere) using instant messages. Ignoring the debate about whether they should be doing this at work (they do get their work done, so it can't be that bad for productivity) I find it amazing that they would enjoy the interruptions. I personally vastly prefer e-mail to phone conversations because I can deal with e-mail when it's a good time for me. IM seems to me to be a return to the annoying days of the telephone.

    1. Re:I guess I'm old -- I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're old -

      Treat a message as an object, and define properties of that object make it an instant message vs. an email:

      Immediate - no delays in delivery
      Brief - very short messages
      Contextual - a single message is usually only part of a conversation

      vs.:

      Store and Forward - not necessarily immediate delivery
      Email is as long as it needs to be
      An email can be completely self contained

      It's the difference between say, a logfile that gets dumped and emailed for review every morning, vs. a software generated alarm like an SNMP trap.

      You could use jabber as an SNMP trap monitor, sending alarms to the appropriate personnels' desktops.

      Of course, the immediacy is only as immediate as you make it. While you can only take one phone call at a time, you can easily multiplex between several IM cionversations and a phone conversation. Ironically, I have trouble multiplexing between composing an email and switching to an IM conversation.

    2. Re:I guess I'm old -- I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am in Microsoft's target group, i.e. grew up with instant messenging. At home and play it's a fun, but I tried it at work and, at least for me, it's a definite no no. I found myself checking other people's away messages and chatting all too much.

      However, if you can separate your "work" buddies (for those who need instant messenging for work) and your "play" buddies, IM at work can be pretty useful.

  52. Productivity by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
    The company that's relentlessly focused on productivity has now produced an anti-productivity tool

    Micro$oft has produced many any-productivity tools in the past. Their so called 'help' systems, such as the animated paperclip is just one of many.

  53. I want this to fail, but by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    At first glance, it seems like they're doing everything wrong. The idea seems stupid.

    But on the other hand, so much of what's popular out there is also stupid. So who knows, maybe it'll pan out. One of the most annoying things is the requirement of XP. WTF?

    If the people at MS actually managed to do sound research on this, then there's no reason for it to fail. I don't think most people have the same kind of negative reaction to being obviously manipulated that we do... But who knows?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:I want this to fail, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      objective or subjective? No, just stupid...

  54. Hats off to Tammy Savage by BAM0027 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Regardless of who she works for, I applaud her drive and use of technology. Three Degrees seems like fun, er, cool, software. Her research into the project was intriguiging.

    If this were through some startup, more people would think it was cool, but she'd be plagued with a lack of resource and substantiation. Now, she has the flipside of all that with Redmond behind her.

    I hope it succeeds though my deepest desire would be for it to be platform independant.

    1. Re:Hats off to Tammy Savage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this were through some startup, more people would think it was cool, but she'd be plagued with a lack of resource and substantiation. Now, she has the flipside of all that with Redmond behind her.



      I don't think that people would think this was that cool if it wasn't MS... It's basically nothing new - just current ideas thrown together. It's just a rehash of currently existing stuff.

    2. Re:Hats off to Tammy Savage by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 1

      In many senses it is a rehash, but it's definitely an innovative rehash. The idea of making sophisticated integrated groupware for social (i.e., non-business)use is an idea whose time has come.

  55. State of Software by Chief+Crazy+Chicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People wonder why the state of commercial software is so sad -- I think that this article sums it up.

    The fact that one of the largest, if not the largest, commercial software companies needs to be told that "the needs and attitudes of the customers should determine what software Microsoft should produce" denotes a total lack of clue on the whole issue of software production.

    Software exists to automate or otherwise make better THE THINGS THAT PEOPLE DO. Thus, these things should be what drive the software. Hence the thrust toward usability, contextual design, the user stories of XP, etc.

  56. Answer by ceeam · · Score: 0

    "Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?"


    No.

  57. Any chance... by TiMac · · Score: 1
    For a Mac OS X version of this thing? You think?

    Sadly, I'm guessing the answer is either "Nope" or "Sure...in a couple years."

    Does Microsoft want to take over AIM's domininance so much that they'll go head-to-head with iChat???

    --

  58. It's the pioneering group by MisterSquid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm in agreement with z_gringo, but in a sorta oblique way.

    The description of the software indicates that threedegrees is a P2P app with a desktop interface. Groups are represented by icons that live on your desktop. Dragging files onto an icon causes members of that group receive copies of those files. This is slick.

    Imagine having several groups--Thursday night bowling tourney, monthly staff colloquim, ad hoc governance committee, family, extended family, in-laws, etc.--all of whom could receive some set or subset of different files you choose. You send the files and then chat about what you've received. This is a low-fi version of virtual reality conferencing.

    Popular chat clients do have a feature like this, but one of the most popular--AOL Insant Messenger--requires you to invite people 1 by 1. Seems to me threedegress admirably leverages P2P communications technology by means of a GUI.

    I am anti-Microsoft as they come: their history makes me so. But threedegrees seems to be a significant application of a GUI to P2P technology. I also think the idea of musicmix is *very* interesting, given that it seems to preserve fair use without infringing on copyright (original owner must be online in order for threedegreed files to be heard).

    I'll withhold final judgement until I can test a threedegree client on my Mac. Until then, threedegrees sounds pretty cool, so I'm game. (ugly EULAs and software hiccups notwithstanding)

    --
    blog
    1. Re:It's the pioneering group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dragging files onto an icon causes members of that group receive copies of those files.


      I hope it asks for confirmation first.

      Are you sure you want to send file "slutwhore.jpg" to group "family"?

    2. Re:It's the pioneering group by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you own a Mac. The "idea" of musicmix in threedegrees is no more revolutionary than what Apple introduced a few months ago with Rendezvous Music Library sharing for iTunes. Now that's cool. Not to mention the other capabilities of Rendezvous. If you're interested in sharing music (legally) over your network or internet get MP3 Sushi at VersionTracker for OS X. Client and server software all in one.

      As always, Apple does it first, Apple does it best.

  59. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Majix · · Score: 1

    I mean, WTF? RedHat 8.0 is supposed to provide an easy-to-install, easy-to-use Linux installation to enable a smooth transition from Windows to Linux. Why the hell does it not come with the Windows filesystem then?

    Red Hat does not include NTFS support because the legal status of the code is not completely clear.

    I've been using Linux since 1996. I know how to compile kernels. Hell, I've been sending development kernel bug reports to the developers. Yet, I was appalled to learn that RedHat 8.0 comes with gcc 3.x which means that you can run into serious problems if you want to compile your own kernel.

    You've been using too old stuff for too long. GCC 3 is hardly bleeding edge anymore, heck, does any distro except Debian include older gcc:s anymore? Furthermore, I've never had a trouble compiling a kernel using GCC 3.x.

    And what the heck are you doing recompiling your kernel, it's the 21st century! You don't have to recompile the kernel for almost anything these days, certainly not for filesystems or cd writing. Use the packaging system in your distribution: http://linux-ntfs.sourceforge.net/info/redhat.html . One minute of googling would have saved you all this trouble.

    To my utter astonishment, W2K would not boot anymore. The initial W2K text screen would appear and even the boot splash screen would show up. But then a "STOP message" appeared on a blue background.

    Are you using Lilo or something equally ancient to update your MBR? A "make install" instead of manually messing with the kernel images and Grub would probably have saved your ass, not mention it's a lot faster.

    The config files Red Hat uses for the kernels are available in the SRPM's. You should use the SRPM's in any case since they're patched way beyond the vanilla kernel tree. Going from a Red Hat supplied kernel to stock images is a real downgrade.

  60. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it have been cheaper, in terms of time and money, to have just bought the DVDs instead of ripping people off?

  61. Oberlin research subjects by Nakanai_de · · Score: 1
    Early in 2000 she got a chance to test her perceptions by getting 12 Oberlin undergrads to live for three weeks in a big house in Seattle (á la "Big Brother"). She told them their job was to think up a business plan for a new company, but all she cared about was the way they used technology to communicate with each other as they cooked up dot-com schemes.

    I'm an Oberlin graduate (class of last year). I spent a fair amount of time in the computer lab my senior year, and I got to know some of the regulars. Feelings for Microsoft were not warm-and-fuzzy, although I did know some people who wanted to intern there for the benefit of their resumes. This tactic of using Obies in an anthropological experiment really gets me, though. Were they told afterwards what the real aim of the project was? Or were they just financially compensated human test subjects? I would think any NDA they would have signed would have had to be written pretty craftily to a) avoid setting off any red flags, and b) give Microsoft exclusive rights to any software arising from behavioral observations.

    --

    Sono koro, bokura wa, sore ga sekai no shinjitsu da to shinjite ita.

    1. Re:Oberlin research subjects by kmellis · · Score: 1
      " This tactic of using Obies in an anthropological experiment really gets me, though."
      You'd be okay with it if it weren't Obies?
  62. The Big Bang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A radiation background of 3 degrees remained after the big bang.... will threedegrees be all that remains of M$ after it implodes?

  63. What is IRC? by rve · · Score: 1

    Where can I buy it?

    1. Re:What is IRC? by IvoryRing · · Score: 1
      And they say no good deed goes unpunished: You can pay for a Windows client here. Mind you, I'm probably subversive, since I use a client with AntiCapitolist Liscensing.

      /me looks for the smirk wink

    2. Re:What is IRC? by Tim+Macinta · · Score: 1
      Where can I buy it?
      Right here. Be sure to install the ChatZilla component (which runs on top of IRC).

      As for what it is, IRC does sound an awful lot like this "innovative" new Microsoft product, except that it's been around for much, much longer (I remember using it a whole decade ago, and it's probably older than that).

  64. Why I won't be using this product. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, first I started reading the article... and... and... and when I saw that "NetGen" catch-phrase I kinda got an urge to skim instead of read... an' then I felt this bitter sensation deep in my throat kinda like I figure they mean on those "Acid Reflux Disease" commercials... and so I skimmed faster to get past Tammy's neeto business meetings an' see if they would actually tell me what this three degrees thing is... and... and... um... I'm scared. Won't this software turn me homosexual?

  65. musicmix - good idea, wont work. by briancnorton · · Score: 1

    Trying to mandate that people switch over to DRM'd music formats is like trying to mandate that they cut off their feet before they go for a walk. I personally think that the lack of MP3 support will kill that particlar app.

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  66. "Socializing", eh? by pommaq · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We already have something similar to this in Sweden, called Lunarstorm. It's got picture uploads, friendfinders, guestbooks, discussion forums, interaction via SMS and mobile phones, voting, voice messages - you name it. It's a very feature-complete site and it's got an incredibly high market penetration among the youth of Sweden and I don't think I'd be exaggerating if I say that at least 70% of Swedish teens have a Lunarstorm account. It's a "community" on the outside, but Lunarstorm is used almost solely for meeting chicks (or guys, depending on gender/preference :)). Recently they've recently adopted a pay model where you can pay a small sum each month to get access to the 'plus' features. They're doing pretty well.

    So what am I getting at? Well, Sweden's a pretty small country, but the sheer momentum of teenagers registered on Lunarstorm creates a singularity that draws everyone in. I wouldn't be surprised if their market penetration among teens reaches 90% in a year or two, if they're not already there. If all your friends have Lunar accounts, you're going to get one, too. If Microsoft can gather the critical mass of teenagers, and deploy something like this in the ol' US of A, it could be massive. They'd get an instant reputation boost among younger people, a chance to market stuff to the teens (Lunarstorm has many insidious ways of doing this), a way of sneaking new software on people (Microsoft DRM mp3's are even in the article!) and, if they've got the balls, a new source of income provided they adopt some sort of pay model. Could be a smart move! Or, it could flop, of course. I'm no genie :)

    I'll dare state this, however: it's all about the critical mass. If Microsoft are clever, they'll subtly make it about the boy-girl interaction. Powerful stuff, that!

  67. Brand Marketing && Corporate Imposed Moral by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    case that they were clue-challenged in understanding an entire generation

    Have a look at that picture, it just screams "We are cool, hip, "individiuals" (the Marketing Idea -- not the adjective). Please read "No Logo by Naomi Klein

    "We wanted things that paralleled our customers' priorities, which was hanging out with your friends and having fun."

    This idea makes me sick. If someone's "priorities" are as above, they should please (PLEASE) read: Neil Postmans' 'Amusing Ourselves to Death' -- here is the foreword

  68. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by avdp · · Score: 1

    Aside from potential legal issues, the NTFS module is not terribly safe to use. Read-only mode is probably OK though, I agree, RedHat could have included the read-only module.

    You don't have to start with a "blank" kernel. The RedHat configs to use for a kernel recompile are all in a subdirectory called configs. Load the appropriate config file (smp, bigmem or whatever) from file (one of the option on xconfig). I have had not problem with this on RH8.

    I have never had RH trash a windows (fat32 or NTFS) partition, even RH8. You sure you did not enable write on the NTFS kernel module? Aside from the "EXPERIMENTAL" word, I believe there is a big disclaimer that says that it might trash your NTFS drivers (might be on the help screen). Either way, I don't see why this is a RedHat issue, as far as I know they are not the authors of this particular module.

  69. what an insight by sirshannon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see it now... a million gullible teens buying and installing Windows XP so they can test a beta. What an ingenius marketing plan.

    1. Re:what an insight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you expect from a bunch of idiots that think rap and hiphop are actually musical?

  70. Music Sharing Bandwidth by carsont · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A group can have no more than ten members


    Songs will be played from the participants' hard drive, rather than illegally swapped.


    So, you're going to be streaming MP3s to ten people at once? The bandwidth requirements for that are going to narrow their market considerably. That would kill my 768k/128k ADSL, it would almost certainly kill a cable modems' outgoing bandwidth, and you could forget about dialup entirely.


    So do they expect these "trendy teens" to also be fantastically rich and have their own personal T3 lines?

    --

    Ubi dubium, ibi libertas.
    1. Re:Music Sharing Bandwidth by darien · · Score: 1

      Presumably, you're going to be streaming it to Microsoft, which is in turn going to reflect your one stream to your nine friends at once. I know they say it's P2P, but there has to be some central server for just this reason. Besides, I can't imagine MS would miss the chance to own all your conversations etc. I wouldn't be at all surprised if you need a Passport account even to log in to threedegrees.

    2. Re:Music Sharing Bandwidth by veddermatic · · Score: 1

      You can stream allright, but you can bet your sweet ass it's not gonna be MP3. You think M$ will allow a file format it doesn't own to be shared via it's OS?

      The only "allowed" file format will be Widnows Media 9 (now with extra DRM!)

      Don;t know this for a fact, but I would take jsut about any odds taht this is the case. M$ want's to OWN on-line music, it does taht by getting Windows Media to be the defacto standard embraced by the RIAA.

      I think this sounds like a "neat" idea that will unfortunately further the underlying goals of complete market dominance by file formats, not quality.

      --
      Department of Homeland Security: Removing the rights real patriots fought and died for since 2001
    3. Re:Music Sharing Bandwidth by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Never heard of swarming, huh? Alice can stream it to Bob who listens and forwards the stream to Charlie, who forwards it on to...

  71. Steven Levy by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Steven Levy, well-known fan of the Macintosh (and unfan of Microsoft) [..]

    Steven Levy not a fan of Microsoft? Since when??? All the articles of his that I ever read in Newsweek have been overwhelmingly supportive of Microsoft, almost to the point of gushing.

    What a hack.

    -jh

  72. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight. You compiled your OWN kernel with NTFS support which is ALPHA at best (Reading is OK, writting is explicitly stated as being broken) and you are blaming RedHat?!?!? Hellooooo in there....

  73. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They ARE my DVDs.

    I want to compress for the same reason I compress my CDs: I want to have them on my hard drive so that I don't have to go about changing discs.

  74. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...W2K would not boot anymore...

    Which is exactly why...

    the default RedHat installation does NOT come with an NTFS filesystem module

    NTFS support in the 2.4.x kernels is dodgy at best. The drivers have been re-written from scratch and have been rolled into the 2.5.x tree, but write support is still experimental. If you need reliable NTFS support in Linux, contact the U.S Supreme Court and ask them about making Microsoft release full and unencumbured documentation for NTFS.

  75. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First of all, reading NTFS should not corrupt things. I didn't compile in writing because I don't need to write anything on the NTFS partition. All I would have liked to do is to read the DivX files so that I can burn them on a CD.

    Secondly, I didn't even mount the frigging NTFS partition. LILO hosed up my hard drive, not NTFS.

  76. Re:Six Words by groomed · · Score: 0
    Big Fucking Deal Teeny Bopper Bullshit
    Bwahahaha, that's very funny! But who moderated it off-topic, and why?! Guess you were looking for a "parental advisory" mod...
  77. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    One minute of googling would have saved you all this trouble.

    Yeah, sure -- if I had a network connection.

    Are you using Lilo or something equally ancient to update your MBR? A "make install" instead of manually messing with the kernel images and Grub would probably have saved your ass, not mention it's a lot faster.

    I use grub and because of certain disasterous results in the past I've never trusted "make install".

    The config files Red Hat uses for the kernels are available in the SRPM's.

    Thanks. That's good to know. I've got a serious dislike of packaged and modified kernels, but since I don't have a network connection I have to use the CDs.

  78. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhuh? And pray tell me how just compiling in the NTFS (not mounting the partition, reading from it not to mention writing on it) could have hosed my system?

  79. Net Gangbangin' (no not THAT kind) by MoreDruid · · Score: 1

    While I think that three degrees seems in theory like a community building tool, what worries me is the limit to 10 participants in a "posse" will create in groups.
    So you're afraid that the homies and hispanics will form online gangs and do some serious shit? Come on! The worst you'll see is a DDoS/TCP drive-by shooting up some silly webserver.
    About the cliques: just remember /. is a clique too - though sometimes socially inept, but that's another thing. And the thing about broadband is, well, it's widely available in the developed countries, but geez... if you want to chat & listen to music but you don't have broadband just run xmms/winamp in the background and you're off (or go live on a Uni Campus... Err. No. Forget that.)
    I honestly think that the basic idea of the program is meritorious, but by limiting users to ten per group, and (and I could be wrong) users to one group, the collaborative aspects are blunted.
    YES it is meritorious (?) BUT limiting it to 10 concurrent users is just a smart networking policy. Geez... I surely wouldn't want my shared cable connection in the student apartment to be clogged with Jane Doe's traffic to/from her friends - all 58 of them.

    --
    The best weapon of a dictatorship is secrecy, but the best weapon of a democracy should be the weapon of openness.
  80. This article was humorous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who in the Hell wants to sit down at an expensive computer with an expensive broadband connection so SOMEONE ELSE can decide what music they will listen to? This is why MP3s are so popular, you can listen to what you want when you want for FREE! And who the Hell wants to be listening to their favorite song and some dumbass frined can click a button and popup a farting sound effect and animation in the middle of it? Computers are popular because they put YOU in control of YOUR media, information and communication. Why is a company lead by a man who is the richest guy in America always trying to GIVE AWAY software to us we didn't know we needed until they told us we did? Anyone remember the rant Gates went on when people were sharing his BASIC on paper punched tapes back in the old days? How ironic....

  81. trust by syle · · Score: 1
    "They have a way of vouching for each other as friends, figuring out who to trust and not trust."

    I think we all know who not to trust in this situation -- the people who want you to switch/upgrade your OS to run a glorified instant messanger.

    --

    /syle

  82. D'uh by kmellis · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    " Instead, Savage reasoned, the needs and attitudes of the customers should determine what software Microsoft should produce, and the technology should come later."
    Wow! This person discovered the most fundamental and obvious prerequisite for being successful in business! Jeepers!

    [pause]

    Well, I have to admit that this was apparently not very obvious to most of the dot-com crowd.

  83. Microsoft Comic Chat goes multimedia? by beacher · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry... I remember Microsoft Comic Chat all too well. The first time I saw

    *** Dork has joined channel
    *** Dork appears as Tika ...

    mode +b *!*@msn.com was applied to the #

    I just don't trust anything multimedia that comes out of Microsoft.. Too many ways to get viruses from applications that aren't supposed to get infected. This is the last thing we need.

    Virulent Tikas spewing their pr0n and hijacking my browser. No thanks.

    -beacher

  84. no idea why i did this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you! bill@microsoft.com has been added.
    We'll be in touch via email once our beta goes live.

  85. Electronic Snake Oil... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    Poor ignorant kids are going to get sucked into the 'Micro-centric' worldview of Bill Gates and company - further padding revenue well into this century.

    I'm wiping my daughter's windows box as soon as possible and reloading Linux; this has gone far enough.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  86. Monopolies and Trusts by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    From the Ars Technica article:
    Threedegrees is also a fascinating experiment in how music can be legally shared over the Internet. After much negotiation, the labels OK'd musicmix, once Microsoft agreed to somewhat hobble its features. (Playlists have a maximum of 60 tunes, and the songs won't play unless the original owner is participating.)

    So let me see if I get this straight: When a monopoly uses its monopoly power to develop a monopoly in a new market, that's bad. But when a monopoly cuts a deal with a trust to develop a monopoly in a new market, that's OK? Where's the Microsoft monopoly abuse guy that was appointed when they lost their last court case?

  87. Re:Three degrees... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    Tell me, do you have a scrapbook of "going to the toilet in the middle of the night" ?

    (blackadder reference)

    graspee

  88. Problem: our company is out of touch. by Qender · · Score: 1

    Solution: Steal from movies!

    Wasn't this thing microsoft describes in that movie "The Net".

    BTW: I believe it was in "microsoft's home of the future" as well.

  89. Re:Where's the market? Where's the cash? by Qender · · Score: 1

    "What's with the arbitrary limitation? My kid sister's 'posse' (blech) is easily twice that big. Sounds like a mess."

    Duh, like, all you have to do is, like, drop some of your friends, uh huh.

    Seriously though, is anyone else as afraid as I am that in microsoft's future people are only allowed to have 10 friends.

  90. Target Market by Bugmaster · · Score: 1
    Who exactly is the target market for this thing ? My teenage sister has been using chat programs for a couple of years now (mostly AIM). Same thing goes for the young siblings of my friends. From what I can tell, modern teenagers are quite at home with using chat services, chatrooms, shoutcast, and of course that evil P2P filesharing that the media warned us about.

    How is the MS app better than the de facto standard apps that exist today ? Perhaps it is aimed at younger children ?

    --
    >|<*:=
  91. Anti-Microsoft Bigotry by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it possible that something good is coming out of Redmond?

    Only a myopic, narrow-minded fool would ask such a question. Microsoft has developed and released some excellent products that continue to kick the fanny of most "free" applications. If all Microsoft software is crap, why do "free" software people keep trying to clone Word and Excel?

    Upon occasion, I've been known to rag on Microsoft for their business practices, security holes, and over-featured monstrosities. They ruined Visual Studio with .Net (it's now REALLY slow and clunky), and Microsoft is often paranoid and downright nasty in their tactics. Word, for all of its good features, is a bloated corpse of technological excess. So hey, I'm no Microsoft shill, and more of my systems run Linux than run Windows.

    Yet for all their faults, Microsoft has accomplished a lot in the last two decades, producing some useful and powerful software. Denying that is simple bigotry, seasoned with jealousy.

    1. Re:Anti-Microsoft Bigotry by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't it really come down to one's own vision of what constitutes "good"? Speaking only for myself, "powerful" and "useful" are not sufficient conditions for "good". Call me a zealot, but I like the commercial software that I buy to play nice with software from other vendors, meaning open protocols and document formats. I also like it to require a platform upgrade only when the unique needs of the application genuinely demands it.

      Being a disappointed ex-customer of Microsoft is not necessarily bigotry...sometimes it's an informed opinion.

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Let the buyer beware.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  92. Re:Puh-lease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er, reference on this page, I mean.

  93. What's New? A real threat? by hhawk · · Score: 1

    I discount the this is some "rebel" product within MS; that is PR spin 100%.

    Everything else, with one major exception, is just a rehash of YIM, ICQ, AIM, blah blah..

    The exception? The music sharing app, which seems cool in as much as they got the "major" labels to sign off on it.. They are actually creating a new type of "fair use." It probably took someone with MS's power and aggressiveness to pull that off.

    The downside? This is sweet candy designed to lock the younger generation into MS-Land. This is aimed directly at keeping LINIX OFF the desktop! That's the real threat.

    --
    http://www.hawknest.com/
  94. Anyone remember sixdegrees.com? by Memetic · · Score: 1

    I used to use sixdegrees.com, it let you commuicate with groups, set types of relationships, build networks, share info etc. Had chat, email and IM on the system.

    It died about 3 years ago.

    If MS try and patent this, i'll be yelling prior art!

  95. even more problems!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great! now there'll be even more file sharing and music piracy for the RIAA to get their teeth into - all logged and traced by M$ of course! ...couple that with an even better way of peadophiles to do some net grooming....they can even narrow down their victims... and flirt with them without the others seeing/hearing

  96. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    The problem (Windows shows the splash screen, but then BSODs) sounds like it could have been caused by using the Linux NTFS driver in r/w mode. I broke a machine once by doing that, I thought that just copying a single file across would be okay, but it wasn't. I knew the write support in ntfs was experimental but hadn't realized it was quite _that_ experimental...

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  97. Is there an opensource project comparible to this? by nexusone · · Score: 1

    I guess ICQ is close, but is not been very linux friendly.

    --
    Wise men speak because they have something to say, Fools because they have to say something!!!!
  98. It's not that unusual by beleg777 · · Score: 1

    If people would set aside their biases, I think they'd be surprised at how good a lot of MS software is. Doesn't change the fact that a lot of it is bad, and that their approach to customers and business interaction is immoral at best.

    --

    Science may someday discover what faith has always known.
  99. Well! If Bill Gates "gets this".. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. then I totally "want this"

  100. musicmix is legal streaming? by TexTex · · Score: 1

    Sure...it's not the same as downloading music via P2P, but I find it real interesting that the article states that lables (meaning...more than one? all the big ones?) okayed Musicmix. Which seems a lot like streaming music to me. A 60-tune playlist is still several hours of music...and because Microsoft asked nicely and because they're Microsoft...it's okay. So any internet radio stations still are under flack...but this form is legit.

    I'm wondering if file transfers between group members will have some sort of MB limit or rather will spawn tiny groups of Morpheus users.

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
  101. Wait.... by Tsali · · Score: 1

    ... (wait) until a terrorist network uses threedegrees... we'll see how long that lasts.

    Then MS would be unpatriotic.

    --
    This space for rent.
  102. what? by Skulk · · Score: 1


    1) you need to have licenses (maybe via media player DRM modules?)
    2) you can't play more than 60 songs on the playlist
    3) others can't play your songs if you are offline.

    1) where have you seen this said? I must have missed it. (not sarcasm, I really don't know)
    2) you also can't have more than 10 people in a group. As far as I can tell, these are both because its still something like a version 2 prebeta
    3) I don't see how you could expect MS to make software that sent out 600 mp3s just because somebody loaded a playlist. That would be both grossly bandwidth intensive, and blatent piracy.

    I've fairly certain that this software is quite a bit outside of microsoft's world domination plan... at least, until it's popular.

    --
    .sig last updated March 9, 1894
  103. threedegrees? by rabidcow · · Score: 2, Funny

    What, was sixdegrees too much?

  104. Geezer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    haha, change your Depends grandpal!

  105. One key feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legal music-sharing.

    Other than that it's just a really, really complicated instant messager.

  106. Re:-1 Plagaristic Karma Whore *kiss-kiss* by pohl · · Score: 1

    It's not plagarism when you properly attribute it to the original author, genius.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  107. ignoring the MS bashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not a bad idea. I know my younger sib and friends are their target demographic. And I know they use MSN, b/c well it's easy:

    It checks if you have hotmail (free email) plus you can msg people live. That is a plus, it's hassle free for a generation that never knew life before internet.

    This new product is a deeper concentration into that area, where people can communicate through IM, email, and can transfer information seemlessly without having to deal with settings and multiple mouse clicks.

    I know in /. people are proud of feeding information into their old tape recorder or reviving an old boxen using some unsupported distro, but MSFT is going after a generation of computer literates and illiterates. (there's a lot of people out there have no idea how to troubleshoot, let alone know what a kernel is).

    If this receives well, they can start putting it on wireless devices, cell phones and palms, with net connection. Maybe influence those markets... if I was their long-term marketer, the possibilities are endless.

  108. Isn't this iChat + iTunes? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Seems to me, that the fuctionality offered by threedegrees is almost exactly the same as iChat + iTunes on the Mac.

    When I first read the article, I thought 'how is this a big deal'? It sounds just like Messenger, with another module. You know, all those little useless things in the menu on the right side (Win version): drawing board, surf together (ha!), etc.

    Now, if only Apple would bloody well release the Rendezvous-enabled iTunes, we'd have a standards-compliant, streaming, ZeroConf version. If you believe the rumours about the next iChat having video capabilities, and supporting the other flavours ala Trillian/Fire (hell I'd settle for just Jabber).... then add mod_rendezvous.... mmmmmmmm.

    (btw I'm not trying to start an Apple vs MS comparison, it's just curious to notice how both MS and Apple are looking for other ways to integrate 'live' net communications, all of a sudden.)

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  109. iChat/IRC + iTunes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As has been pointed out already, most of what it does is already in IRC. And Mac OS has iChat for IM. (I kind of wish it did IRC, too, but that's not stopping me from using IRC.) I'm not going to lose any sleep over that.

    Remember Steve's now-famous iTunes demo where he showed how you could play music from somebody else's iTunes playlists? It's not exactly the same, but I think being able to pick my own music would be at least as good as what 3degrees has.

    On a positive note, maybe since Microsoft got a "plays-my-music-on-your-computer" thing past the record companies, Apple will finally be able to ship the new iTunes with that feature. It was demoed months ago. The only reason I can imagine for the holdup is the lawyers.

    1. Re:iChat/IRC + iTunes by TiMac · · Score: 1
      The only reason I can imagine for the holdup is the lawyers.

      Sadly....this is not what I heard....

      ........

      --

  110. Let me get this straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So microsoft has now invented IRC? Only in this case, its IRC with a limit on how many people can be in a room? Cute. How many "cliques" do you belong to that are only 10 people? Particularly online, this is not the case.

    Too little, too late, mediocre at best, again. The microsoft way.

  111. Nothing's as good? by Skulk · · Score: 1


    I've had ZERO problems with XP since week one, when I stopped using explorer ("exploder") as a shell.

    I've run webservers, fileservers, gameservers, done sound and video editing, played games, encoded movies, watched DVDs, image editing, rendering, etc etc, all in various combinations without any trouble - and had month long uptimes. (Choosing to shut down every time) I'm not going to go saying that it's as stable as Linux can be... this is all just my experience. I still choose to have Linux on other computers.

    If you dont like stuff crashing, I'd highly suggest an alternative shell. (look for a 4.10 version in the boards if you're bleeding-edge-inclined).

    --
    .sig last updated March 9, 1894
    1. Re:Nothing's as good? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I just installed Geoshell 4.9.2.

      The interface is minimal and well designed, and it's exactly what I'm looking for...

      except that it crashed twice on me in 5 minutes. Once because I tried to browse a drive (that could be because it had to talk to explorer) and again because I tried to use the skin manager (visual basic error).

      So it's not flawless either. But it's not a final product nor is it purported to be. For now I'll stick to explorer, but I think I'll be checking Geoshell every week or two just to check on progress :)

    2. Re:Nothing's as good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well lets see, you seem to be the only one that says things crash every minute. so I think its your fault. shit works as advertised for me, not for you, in fact consistantly not for you, therefore who the fuck cares about you? fix your computer.

    3. Re:Nothing's as good? by Skulk · · Score: 1

      well, I cant say I've ever run into the drive/browse problem. I'm curious about it. I'll go look around...

      As for the skin changer, I personally do that by changing a path in regedit. (for those who dont know, Geoshell's settings are basically listed in the registry). Overall, geo might be... picky, but I when I use it, I get a clear sense of cause and effect. Also, as you point out, it's minimal - that's certainly why I chose it in the first place.

      Finally, 4.10 seems to fix a few things. When that gets put on the front page, it will be worth trying again :) It took me two installs to get hooked. But once you spend a few minutes shaping the interface around how you work, you dont want to go back. Well, I didn't :)

      --
      .sig last updated March 9, 1894
    4. Re:Nothing's as good? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's not what I said, but thanks for the snap judgement and the obvious bitterness in your response. What happened, hand fall asleep while masturbating and you can't deal with the rejection?

    5. Re:Nothing's as good? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      I'll hunt it down on the forum there, as I like it better than the default shell already. The browse crash was inconsistent, so I've no idea what triggered it.

      Usually when explorer crashes (the odd time, not every time like the anonymous coward below ranted about), it's related to a bad control or something on a web site that brings down IE and anything else tied into it, blanking the systray as well. Not having everything tied to the one app is nice. :)

    6. Re:Nothing's as good? by 2057 · · Score: 0

      geoshell isnt the only shell available, plenty of stable shells, http://shells.lokai.net/, read the articles on this site, i recently switched from geoshell which crashes almost every 30 minutes to blackbox which almost never does, the only big problem i've had with Blackbox is, um setting the menus i guess...

      --
      For The Best Jazz/Hip-hop fusion > COlD DUCK
  112. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  113. looks neat, but 'musicmix'... by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    Is it just me of does 'musicmix' scream out 'double standard'? Unless users of the product are having to pay the same bogus "internet radio" fees to which all net broadcasters are subject?

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  114. check please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the MSNBC article...

    Then there are "winks": small animations that you trigger to run on everyone's screen. Some of the standards include big lips smacking a kiss or a heavyset cartoon character who drops trou and cuts the cheese.

    An animation of a fat kid farting? No thanks. How about a "wink" that automatically opens their copy of IE and loads up goatse.cx?

  115. In other news: by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

    Hell has just frozen over. It would also appear that the devil has cornered the market in ice skate manufacturing. Stay tuned for further devilopements...

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  116. Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Create a grand social study (younger people lack the experience-are naive)
    2. find/create a pecking order
    3. ????
    4. Profit

    Climatising youth to less privacy, with ways to control decent, with somewhat a plassable deniability.

    The stigmatizer and population is on the same side, I've yet to see a conviction even though I have seen acknowledgement of said practice. If the victim reacts, the victim reacts to the population because of access and misidentification.

    At least when things like columbine happen there will be a *paper* trail.

  117. I just watched the "tour" video..... by drdanny_orig · · Score: 1

    ... and I already feel violated. Maybe I'm way out of touch with young people, but I don't think any of the 13-24's that I know would be fool enough to fall for this pap. Talk about clueless.

    --
    .nosig
  118. iChat by hexdcml · · Score: 1

    Ok, so apart from sharing the playlists, this sounds exactly like iChat for OS X. In iChat I can do all the things 3degrees claims to do - perhaps not the playlist thing... but I can share pictures by dragging a pic into the chat, files and folders by dragging and dropping. I can put all my music into my webserver directory, and hey, I don't even need to be connected to the Internet with Rendevous. In addition, when Apple decides to to that iTunes-over-Rendezvous thing, it will be even better. Looks like M$ is just playing catch up; and trying to appeal to the masses - from which, I can see their point, and I'm not dissing them for doing so. It's just that its nothing to jump about (which, I thnk, is the general reaction here anyway...) ;)

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
  119. Let's beat them on every field! by Mondongo · · Score: 1

    3Degrees is Microsoft trying to lure youngsters. It's ok; that's what business is about. What the OSS community should do, then, is compete in that field too.

    Any coders up to do a killing youngster app? Microsoft wouldn't stand a chance. :-)

    Mondongo

  120. MS messenger part of OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ;) so this cannot be undeployed

  121. Did I hear a pop? by t0ny · · Score: 1
    MS hiring kids out of college and having them do their own thang... sounds like a dot-bomb experiment waiting to happen.

    Oh well, hopefully someone can figure out how to make instant messaging useful.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  122. Hey Microsoft... by retro128 · · Score: 1

    I've got one word for you..."Bob".

    --
    -R
  123. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I want to have them on my hard drive so that I don't have to go about changing discs."

    It certainly is taxing! "40 seconds? I want it now!"

  124. WTF? by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    Steven Levy, well-known fan of the Macintosh (and unfan of Microsoft)

    Maybe I missed it... Before I turned off the NewsSpeak (thank you, Jello Biafra...) I remember reading Levy rolling around like a puppy on stink about how XP was great. This was his preview piece on it, before it came out. He loved the stability.

    Anyone else got that uncontrollable urge to doink someone in the eyes really hard, three stooges style?

    Goldak!

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  125. Brings me back to MUD by f64 · · Score: 1

    when i started at high-school, i spend the first year MUDding most of the time; i lost some 20kg because i was skipping meals, and my friends all thought i was sucking bong way too often cause i looked like a zombie.

    i had online sex before irl-sex.

    i guess what i want to say is, sure there is a market among kids for this kind of stuff, and if it's an easy UI it might hook people who otherwise are turned off by IRC or Telnet or even by having to switch between kazaa & ICQ for their comm needs.

    i'm not saying it's "good" or anything, but since when has marketing sellable goods been directed by "good" intentions? it might just be the one app that manages to create a big enough community of people (and future microserfs who will not be able to change OS because microsoft has stored all their private data and will publish it if you try to divorce ms) to make online friends an (more so) accepted phenomenon of human relations; thereby releasing all hell onto earth in form of sociopathic computer-bound anemic freaks with special needs and demographically specialized products & services (oh, wait, we're here already...).

    i, on the other hand, am still waiting for those communities that gibson envisioned (in mona lisa overdrive, was it?) where i can buy sweatshop-programmed street wear for my randewuuz in cyberspace.

    this .sic lies

  126. No, nothing good comes from Redmond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's never possible for anything good to come out of Redmond. Something may seem good, but there's always a catch.

  127. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft has announced technology to enable a "virtual circle jerk". Leveraging the pre-teen market of it's successful threedegrees offering, Microsoft is encouraging users entering puberty to click and drag pr0n to the desktops of friends. Microsoft is also believed to be working on a means for delivering Kleenex tissues and screenwipes remotely.

  128. Please Read/Reply [Nautilus] by bicho · · Score: 1

    All I have read on this discussion made me wonder, How flexible are Nautilus desktop Icons?

    I mean, If I dragged ann dropped something, enything, could I tie a process to the icon and made it process the dropped thing, whatever it was? (a makefile would be maked, files in some icon would pop a dialog propting for a mail direction to mail the files, or even print them, another would recive an xml file and would start an icq(or ither im) connection with whatever was descripted on the file, etc) ?

    I think I'll propose/ask about this on its mailing list, if it has one.

    --

    errera hunamum ets
  129. Someone already did this: it's called iStorm by Morganth · · Score: 1

    You can see it here. From the way these reviewers seem to describe Threedegrees, it is basically a limited IRC chat (10 at a time, why 10?) with some other features that already exist elsewhere (the common playlist idea isn't new, and "Winks" is just a cute, marketable term), and a bunch of stuff that you can see in iStorm.

    One difference is, iStorm doesn't talk about "marketing its product to 13-24 year olds." The developers see it as a tool for brainstorming. The other difference is, iStorm is probably actually used to help people think through ideas, whereas Threedegrees will be yet another way (along with AIM, Counterstrike, and most college social life) for people to just sit around engaging in mental masturbation.

    Maybe I'm being too harsh.

  130. This is not cool by iReflect · · Score: 1


    I'm right smack in the middle of their taget demographic, and I think this is totally lame. So would my friends.

    On another note, I'd say this looks like the MS version of HelloWorld.

  131. Microsoft Borrowing Ideas Again? by PPCAvenger · · Score: 1

    The moment I saw the threedegrees flash demo I was reminded of a recent app I was reading about.

    It's called HelloWorld and is made by Co/Operating Systems, Inc.

    It is a P2P app that overlays the desktop, supports drag and drop file transfers, does instant messaging, sends/shares images and even lets you send emoticons including kissing lips. The CoSI product seems to be considerably more advanced, however.

    This could just be a big coincidence and both Microsoft and Co/Operating Systems had similar ideas at the same time but then Microsoft does have a history of usurping others ideas...

  132. Not plagarism when you ARE the original author by NZheretic · · Score: 1
  133. Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have doubts that this software will be successful, but what's most sad is this: the group reminds me of the early Apple and Microsoft companies - lots of ideas and everyone questioning them. But, here's the sad part: Microsoft and Apple blossomed into huge companies with enormous profits, but these "kids" will have their product owned by the big boys. No huge profits, just grinding away making money for "the man". It's sad that the big companies co-opt everything new and bankroll everything into their own pockets, rather than anyone actually being capable of (god forbid) profiting from their own invention.

  134. Mice... by drumsetdrummer · · Score: 1

    ...the Microsoft Scroll Wheel Mouse is the best in it's class. They're durable, work great and are reasonably priced. I highly recommend them.

    As far as software goes, I'd have to give M$ a pretty bad review.

    But their mice rock.

  135. Are you concerned with your child's Privacy? by louzerr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It looks like this software could be used, not only to bring a group of kids together, but also to spy on them. Does this concern anyone?

    Ever since Microsoft introduced Passport.net, where they will store all your personal information for you (gee, thanks), and their new parental filters for MSN that require you registring your kids at passport.net, it's occurred to me that parents must not care very much for their children's privacy.

    Microsoft is a marketing company - not a technology company. All their technology is a hack of technology that they've stolen or 'bought out' (stolen) from real technology companies. They want to know all about your children, because that's who they hope to market to next.

    Please be careful with your children's future! Don't sell them out to Microsoft! For the sake of technology, and even your community, you should be doing as much to distance yourself from this shameless corporate hitler as possible.

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -- "Step Right Up", Tom Waits
  136. Ugh. Pointless Annoyware... by fondue · · Score: 1

    ...designed by and for out-of-touch, braying, soulless marketing cretins. I hope it dies on its arse like Microsoft Bob.

    "Unlike Bob, however, threedegrees has been created and tweaked by the same kinds of people who will use it."

    I'm-so-wacky corporate freaks? Guess what you jackasses, instant messanging already provides all the functionality you describe with none of the empty-headed bullshit!

    I for one will not be validating the pathetic excretions of these creativity-free oxygen thieves with my attention or CPU cycles.

    This entire concept manages to be far more offensive to my sensibilities than the most devious of DRM plots. There's nothing worse than greedy suits pretending to be 'down with the kidz': Just look at J Allard.

    --

    Preferences > Homepage > Customize stories on homepage > Authors > Zonk > Uncheck

  137. Hive from Aplese by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1


    It's been nagging at me all day, and I just remembered where I'd seen something like this before.

    It's "Hive" from Aplese. Here's the URL:

    http://www.alberg.com/products/hive.html

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  138. Re:Microsoft Reinvents Existing Technologies... ag by e1618978 · · Score: 1

    Al Gore invented IRC

  139. Take Photos Now, It Will Be Gone Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twenty-somethings into filesharing do it because they want as much content as possible for free, with absolutely no restrictions. Microsoft will not give them this.

  140. I don't get it. by Boy+Jenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm right in the middle of the "Internet Generation", so I would expect this software that's targeted at me to appeal to me. It doesn't. Again, Microsoft shows its thorough incapacity to innovate (and I type this on my WinXP machine). Pretty much, they're saying that this threedegrees has three features: Chat, Winks, and Musicmix. The chat thing has already been done by n-1 different programs, (Trillian, AIM, MSIM, Yahoo!IM, etc.). All of these I find to be imperfect (tho' functional; I'm using AIM right now). I'd really like a messenger service that's tuned to fuse instant messaging and e-mail; that is, if I'm at my computer, I can communicate syncronously with a friend, but if I'm away, my friend can always leave a message. I don't see that happening with threedegrees. Winks? Winks? Are these animations supposed to excite me? Or insult me? 'nuff said. Musicmix? I don't really get that. From the looks of things, it's not well implemented. I could see a lot of fights breaking out over which song gets played when (at least, with folk like my friends). Will music actually get played, or will one person turn off another's music and play his own? So what would be a good product for the "Internet Generation?" I like messaging my friends. I can type a lot faster and more accurately than I can speak, and IMing allows me to carry on coherant conversations with half a dozen people simultaneously. Still, the messaging ought to be able to flex; good messaging should be able to allow for clear, effective communcation both synchronously and asynchronously. The Musicmix thing might be pretty neat, but it looks to be horribly implemented at the moment. I'd like to see some functions that allow moderation, and perhaps hosting privilges. I'd like to see something that can play games. Even board games like Chess, Checkers, Backgammon, or card games like Hearts, Rummy, Spades, and Spoons would be pretty cool. (Of course, original games would be welcome!) When I'm with my friends in real life, we normally wind up playing something; I'd like to do the same online. Do any 13-24 year olds think the threedegrees is cool? If so, speak up. I might just be odd.

  141. going to fail... by jaxle · · Score: 1

    im 16 and im 100% posotive this will fail, except with the few computer nerds who will try it and toss it cos its gay

  142. One word, GAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a person who's not entirely far from the age bracket their aiming, I can honestly say this looks to be the biggest, gayest, piece of software I've seen in a while.

  143. Coming from an old guy.... by sawilson · · Score: 1

    Blink was around like, two years in the scene before
    they "sold out" so to speak. Before they started
    showing up as guest VJ's on mtv. A lot of the people
    that don't like Blink don't like them for the same
    reason. They are just one of 230498293087 billion
    bands that sound exactly like Less Than Jake. If
    you never liked Less Than Jake to begin with, why
    like 230498293087 billion bands that sound just like
    them? That and a lot of people think "type of music"
    when they hear the word "punk". They don't think
    "lifestyle" or "scene". Scenesters are annoying no
    matter what scene they are trying their hardest
    to fit into. :)

  144. RE: What about firewalls? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    One big show-stopper for threedegrees could possibly be problems xferring files back and forth when some of the users are behind a firewall.

    I don't know how much care MS has taken to deal with this issue -- but here's hoping it's not using sloppy "DirectPlay" type code, where the games may be talking on any random subset of thousands of possible port numbers!

    Even on the venerable IRC chat, DCC of files has been troublesome. Many clients require tweaking of settings before they'll properly do a DCC receive or send.

    ICQ seems to be trying to avoid much of this hassle by placing their centralized server(s) in the middle of data transactions, as sort of a middle-man that ensures a chat or file request gets from point A to point B. Is that the MS strategy here too?

  145. "CNET news.com.com.com.com.com" by koreth · · Score: 1

    What's up with the whole ".com.com" thing, anyway? Why do so many sites link to stories using news.com.com URLs rather than just news.com?

  146. Re:RedHat 8.0 hosed my installation! by caspper69 · · Score: 1

    Your blue-screen is probably an "Inaccessible boot device" error. RH7 & 8 did this to my old machine because of the way I had it set up (single hdd on a raid controller). I was able to fix the problem by re-installing windows as an upgrade. Not the best fix in the world, but it did work. Apparently, re-partitioning can cause this problem. It can be doubly bad if your boot drive (not your windows partition mind you) is NTFS. You may also try 'fixboot' and/or 'fixmbr' from the Windows recovery console. Beware that these may render your linux partition unusable. My advice to you is to plan very well your partition layout, and get it working with Windows BEFORE you install linux. That way, everything should still work fine.

    Obviously, your problem may be different, so if this info. is useless, I apologize in advance.

  147. Not an original idea... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's already a Spanish site with a similar concept, and to top it off it's called 360 degrees (in English).

    http://www.360degrees.tv/

  148. innovative product design methodology by ketan · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    Microsoft had to discard its methodology of starting with a technology and then creating products. Instead, Savage reasoned, the needs and attitudes of the customers should determine what software Microsoft should produce, and the technology should come later.
    Design FIRST, THEN implement. That's brilliant!
    --
    You have a choice: tax and spend Democrats, or borrow and spend Republicans. Choose wisely.
  149. Re:what? by lingqi · · Score: 1
    heh. that's a really good question (the one about DRM); Now that I can't find it, I am beginning to doubt myself.

    but (2) and (3) are in the original article. Quoting

    Threedegrees is also a fascinating experiment in how music can be legally shared over the Internet. After much negotiation, the labels OK'd musicmix, once Microsoft agreed to somewhat hobble its features. (Playlists have a maximum of 60 tunes, and the songs won't play unless the original owner is participating.)

    Originally I must have thought of DRM because

    a) they are using media player
    b) the records won't let them get away with sharing stuff that's not "authenticated"
    c) the "other's can't play your song if you are not participating" part

    (a) is a deduction; (b) is an assumption (though one based on much precedence); (c) could be argued that it's just a limitation on the P2P nature - but on the other hand "participating" is a tricky word - does that mean if you are not online or in 3deg? I can imagine I have a perfectly good connection, but am participating in another group, or doing research paper, but would want my friends to listen to my tunes. (granted, might just send them over, or write a "song server" bot).

    so, I apologize for the inaccurate information - but I still stands that it would be unlikely (no DRM) otherwise.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  150. Balmer: Security Security Security by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. It will be hacked nine ways to Sunday. Imagine posing as a posse member and dishing out some executable to all the friends on the list. Heck, you won't even have to hack the new protocols, etc. Just hack the box like always. Pose as little jr and kill his friends computers! Nice way to get oneself kicked out of the posse!

    This could backfire in a big way! Look at me Ma, no hands! Oops, Smack, years worth of dental work.

    They better come up with better security than what 's on MSN Messenger!

    You would not believe how many morons ask me to help them with their computers at home and how much they whine that their new Broadband is slow. I get there and they've got three computers so heavily infected with viruses, trojans, worms, and spyware that it's no wonder what happened to their bandwidth! The number one culprits who caused the mess in the first place? Kids!

    All the same it's an interesting idea but a huge time waster. Sounds like a DotBomb idea until MS figures out how to generate revenue from it. Corporations everywhere will end up having to ban it for security and bandwidth consumption.

  151. I'm young-- I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly have never really liked instant messaging and chat. I use it some times but it annoys me, I know the other person is having 6 conversations while doing work and talking on the phone not to mention you cannot hear voice tones. Honestly as a 21 century person some things are better the old way, telephones or how about human contact. I agree email is a really useful tool but until we get widespread video im I am not about it.

  152. I hate to say it, but by golrien · · Score: 1

    This is a complete load of shite. A completely useless program, though of course it makes smart business sense - what's the most effective way to make people buy a product? Make their children want it. Microsoft wants to get into yet another market, and they're doing it by introducing a completely useless product. What's next, a little image of a paperclip that displays error messages in little speech bubbles and searches through help files? Oh, wait.

    "...creates a peer-to-peer social group in which people can chat, share photos, listen to music and meet friends"

    Most of my friends don't have 'net access at all, but I also know a bunch of people who I've only ever spoken with over the internet. In fact, there's only one person who I see on a regular basis and chat with over IM. But even if all my friends were geeks, I can do all those things already. I run an OpenBSD system, and a combination of Gaim, FTP, gtk-gnutella, and some webspace courtesy of Webslum, I can share music, share photographs, talk to people and meet other people. With my other friends, I share music via the ancient technique of "CD burning" and chat via "spoken word" and occasionally "telephone".

    "The ability to form personal, ad hoc communities and perform shared tasks means this product will have a lot of appeal in the 13- to-24-year-old market"

    I can do that already. It's called my "contact list".

    "Another feature, known as Winks, lets one customer send animation to everyone in the group. "Winks is an activity where they can basically 'wink' at someone across the room, but (you) do it virtually--flirt with them," Savage said."

    What the fuck? I can't even begin to make sense of this passage. Why on earth would I want to send something to every person I know at once? Especially not some kind of "animation". I have no desire to "flirt" to a bunch of people I can't see.

    "Group members also can share photos and, more importantly, listen to music available in a common playlist."

    Me too! I have several CD's copied off my friends, and they have more of mine. I've also put together a bunch of compilations from MP3's I've got off the internet (usually bands that are scared of releasing stuff in England or where there's just no hope of buying it out here in the countryside, and have been recomended to me by friends in other countries, or that I've recorded off late-night radio shows, or whatever). Friends of mine have copies of them. We listen to them in school, which would be kind of difficult if they were on my computer at home.

    Over the internet, I don't need some special program to tell me what they're listening to - they can use an instant messanger to say to me "Today I am listening to Half Man Half Biscuit" and I can say "That's funny, so am I! Fred Titmus!", or whatever.

    I could go on. This is essentially a completely useless program - especially to me, a person who lives in the middle of nowhere on a
    There seem to be a bunch of pointless arbitrary limits. Why 10 people? While I can imagine it useful as a tool for bullying ("sorry, we'd love to speak to you, but we're up to our limit of ten people! Isn't life a bitch?"), is there a rational reason I can't have, say, 11 friends?

    Why a playlist of 60 songs? I have three compilation CDR's with more than that on, and that's just scraping the surface of my music collection (and of course, ignoring the hundreds of pounds-worth of music I've paid for legally and my friends have also paid for legally).

    You'd think I was some grumbling old man who remembers when music sharing was done by gathering around the gramophone, but I'm a 16-year old who uses the internet for many social purposes. And I, one of the so-called "NetGen" (okay, so probably the average "NetGen" person doesn't spend most of their free time coding computer games, but it's their definition, not mine) can recognise this for the pointless bullshit it is.

  153. I don't think you get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows XP had bugs. So they fixed (a lot of) them, presumably including something that is required for Threedegrees.

    Also, if you actually go and try to run Threedegrees, one of the downloads you have to get is this IPV6 thing, which frankly I'm not sure Windows 2000 supports yet. (I'll have to go check what's slated in SP4, I suppose.)

    It's not an evil plot to 'get you', it really isn't. I'd much rather have Windows XP telling me I need to download the (free) updates than telling me... nothing at all, leaving me susceptible to all kinds of unfun problems.

  154. Not really what they're talking about by dalangalma · · Score: 1

    1) iChat is an AIM wrapper. A nice one, but it's just like using AIM.

    2) Rendezvous is nice, but has nothing to do with threedegrees or instant messenging.

    3) If you need an autoconfigurating wireless protocol to chat with somebody else's computer IN THE SAME ROOM, you've got bigger problems than that.

  155. MS and Features by dalangalma · · Score: 1

    When MS came to my school I had a little chat with one of the reps... he wasn't on the IE team, but I asked him about IE anyway - I want to know what's going on with IE7. I told him that I can't wait to have the #1 market-share browser get some more standards support, so that writing (and viewing) web pages would be a lot easier. He told me that standards support and pedestrian things like HTML rendering aren't that important, and wouldn't I rather have those developers working to add things like PowerPoint-style page transitions or 3D special effects to web pages? At this point I thought about punching him in the face and running in one direction for an hour. I just don't get it.

    1. Re:MS and Features by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 1
      and wouldn't I rather have those developers working to add things like PowerPoint-style page transitions or 3D special effects to web pages? . . . . .I just don't get it.

      Three words "Embrace and Extend".

      When you own 95% of the browser market, you ARE the standard. Just like word 5-> word 2000, it's far easier to keep control of the market when the target that your competitors are trying to stay compatible with is rapidly moving.

      If there's a DOJ-2 lawsuit, I honestly think that the best thing that could be done in terms of limiting the damage that MS can do post-Netscape would have been to force them to keep it compatible with open standards.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
  156. I think there'll be a lot of adoption by dalangalma · · Score: 1

    I don't know how they're planning to make money off it, but I can see a LOT of people using this. I rarely get songs off Kazaa anymore - I usually grab stuff from my friends' FTP servers if they suggest something, or they upload something themselves to mine. This just seems like a more intuitive user interface for such a thing. Given some improvements (like the inevitable hack to remove all those silly limitations) this seems like a great idea for college campuses where lots of students want to share stuff. I mean, KaZaA's nice, but you have to know what you're looking for. It's much nicer to have somebody hand you something you've never heard of and say "Hey, you might like this."

  157. Sounds like an eCircles clone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eCircles did all these things from 1997 until 2000.

    They eventually ran out of money and were bought by Classmates.

  158. Re:what? by Skulk · · Score: 1


    it would be unlikely (no DRM) otherwise

    Well, I think you'll be quite surprised, then. We'll see :)

    --
    .sig last updated March 9, 1894