Slashdot Mirror


Latest Animatrix Short Released

martyn s writes "The latest animatrix short, The Second Renaissance, Part 2 is finally out. This short is the continuation of The Second Renaissance Part 1. Taken together, these shorts document how, in the matrix universe, 'Man was the architect of his own demise.'" And here's the BitTorrent link.

304 comments

  1. These are awesome! by tommertron · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I love the idea of these shorts. Kudos to the license holders for doing these.

    --
    Random rants about technology: http://technorants.blogspot.com
  2. But the machines had a role too... by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 2, Funny

    They were the contractors he hired after he'd finished his blueprints!

    1. Re:But the machines had a role too... by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 1

      It was supposed to be a joke, mods. ;) Perhaps it was lame enough to warrant the one Troll mark.

  3. Slashdot Reloaded by mao+che+minh · · Score: 5, Funny

    I liken the recent rebirth, revelations, and renaissance of trolling on Slashdot to the soon-to-be-classic epic battle between Neo (played by actor Keanu Reeves) and the rogue virus Agent Smith (portrayed by the esteemed actor Hugo Weaving).

    In this climactic and feverishly pitched battle, a rejuvenated Agent Smith confronts Neo. Neo (cmdr taco) has increased his power (anti troll filters) exponentially. Agent Smith (troll) has since developed the ability to infect the "shells" of others, a process which he uses to effectively multiply. At the outset of the battle, Agent Smith attempts to first infect Neo and spread into his "system". The troll filters prove amiable, and Neo easily repels this clever initial attack. Undaunted, the troll (Agent Smith) seeks to gain assistance from those in his surrounding environment. With the most excellent and well placed of trollings, Agent Smith captures the hearts and minds of many others, effectively creating an army in his own image (Trollkore, CLIT, You Fail It, IN SOVIET RUSSIA, etc).

    This new army of Agent Smiths pour down upon Neo in a glorious wave of absurdity, brutal character attacks, vulgar ASCII imagery, and unprecedented and unusual tales of sexual escapades. The ensuing melee is a remarkable epic of good vs. evil, as the many trolls continue to pour down upon cmdr taco, seeking to defeat him with an avalanche of numbers. The outcome to this bitter rivalry has yet to be seen.

    Which is where we find ourselves tonight gentlemen.

    This is a war, and we are soldiers.

    1. Re:Slashdot Reloaded by msimm · · Score: 1

      Nope, seem to be working just fine.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    2. Re:Slashdot Reloaded by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1

      Odd. I do not remember any of us supporting trolls. You must be in another reality again human. Here. . . have some raw opium. You apparently have not had enough recently.

  4. It's AOL! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why are we using BitTorrent to spare AOL's bandwidth?!?!?!? We never use BitTorrent to spare the poor guy who builds a lego robot or whatever and hosts his site on his DSL and then gets slashdotted. Sometimes Slashdot editors can just be so dumb...

    --
    main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    1. Re:It's AOL! by hfastedge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      mainly.... to start a revolution.

      --

      -- -- --

      Help my mini cause: My journal

    2. Re:It's AOL! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, and here are the REAL links to the second episode (as I post this, the links in the article still point to the first episode).
      Medium version (recommended for people with non-godly computers, the large version starts skipping frames)
      Large version

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:It's AOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As of this posting, the Large version link is 404'ed.

    4. Re:It's AOL! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 0, Troll

      Try again a couple of times. AOL's servers seem to be having a bit of trouble under the load. They are using some weird load-balancing thing. Once you get through, though, it's nice and fast.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    5. Re:It's AOL! by ctishman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, by kicking me off at 90% all the time. I've tried about 6 times, and keep getting kicked. P.S.: My "godly" G4/400 doesn't skip any frames. :P

    6. Re:It's AOL! by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1, Informative

      What's the point, I was getting 350 KB/s anyways. I'm sure bittorrent was much much slower.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    7. Re:It's AOL! by computer_redneck · · Score: 0

      What's the point, I was getting 350 KB/s anyways. I'm sure bittorrent was much much slower Hrmmm I am downloading direct from FORD and getting 450. Gotta love Corporate America and gigabit backbones for the company.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BF
    8. Re:It's AOL! by GNUman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I get it with wget, it get's cut (and it did several times), it just resumes where it left.

    9. Re:It's AOL! by Gruturo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      What's the point, I was getting 350 KB/s anyways. I'm sure bittorrent was much much slower.

      Sorry to disappoint you pal, 459 KB/s over BitTorrent (I took a picture :-) )

      Currently I'm keeping it open and it's uploading about 30KB/s.

      --

      Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
    10. Re:It's AOL! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      You must be a slow blinker. ;)

    11. Re:It's AOL! by betat · · Score: 1

      Actually, i'm thankful for the BitTorrent link. While you might be able to get a good download speed with AOL, I do not. For some reason, maybe because I'm on the other side of the world, the best I can get is 5kbps when I download from AOL...and i'm using DSL. With BitTorrent, there's no problem in attaining full speed while helping others with the same predicament.

  5. Site is fixed by Odaeus · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you went along earlier today there would have been the pages accessible to download Part 2, except all of the links pointed to the first episode! I think a professional site could do a bit better than that. As some of you may have discovered after downloading a hundred megabyte file. :)

    1. Re:Site is fixed by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 1

      I think a professional site could do a bit better than that. As some of you may have discovered after downloading a hundred megabyte file.

      I think an informed /.'er would've noticed the filenames were the same...

      To those who wasted their bandwidth, its like my friend says "It's your own fault, buddy."

    2. Re:Site is fixed by tx_mgm · · Score: 1

      I think a professional site could do a bit better than that. As some of you may have discovered after downloading a hundred megabyte file. I think an informed /.'er would've noticed the filenames were the same...

      true, unless an informed /.'er changed the original filename to something readable!

      --
      Gentlemen...BEHOLD!
      -Dr. Weird
    3. Re:Site is fixed by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it's true, I posted this story before I actually finished downloading the movie, and I included direct download links to the wrong files, to part 1. I was afraid the whole slashdot community would rise up against me, but luckily the editors took those links out and included the bittorrent link instead.

  6. Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by `Sean · · Score: 4, Informative

    wget -c http://progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/animatrixlgfinal_dl.m ov

    For those of you who keep getting dropped or get half finished downloads...

    1. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by `Sean · · Score: 1

      A blinding flash of the obvious...that's for the large version. Use wget -c with any of the below direct links for the smaller or zipped version.

    2. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by `Sean · · Score: 1

      Hrm...cutting and pasting the URL into wget is no more work than cutting and pasting the URL into your download manager. Interesting logic. Oh, wait, I had to type -c. I better trash my Mac OS X box and install XP now.

      And who said anything about Linux?

    3. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 1

      Yeah... cos nothing like getright exists in Linux.

      Oh wait, doesn't Konqueror have a built in download manager? KGet or something? Hrm.

    4. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by lamp77 · · Score: 1

      I use wget on windows, it's great. and you don't have to type it all out, copy and paste works fella.

      wget IS a download manager.

    5. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't have to cut and paste anything into getright. it starts downloading automatically with a click.

    6. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This "user-friendly" thing you speak of interesting, I've heard of it before, vaguely.

    7. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also helps you out by letting you know about deals on major brands that you might be interested in.

      No thanks. I'll just use curl.

    8. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by SashaM · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, that's what I did, and now I can watch part 1 again :-(

      Instead, use:
      wget -c http://progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_320_dl.zip (small - 320x136)
      wget -c http://progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_480_dl.zip (medium - 480x204)
      wget -c http://progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_640_dl.zip (large - 640x272)

      Oh, and don't forget to remove the space slashdot adds after "wbonline/".

    9. Re:Totally sweet...wget -c rocks... by RestiffBard · · Score: 3, Funny

      wow... you read a manpage... just wow.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  7. T3 by sexysasian · · Score: 0

    ...Still waiting for Terminator 3.... (please, god, let this movie not suck, because I will surely kill myself)

    1. Re:T3 by ZaMoose · · Score: 3, Funny

      Arnold? Is that you?

      I didn't know they even got the Internet in Austria...

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:T3 by sexysasian · · Score: 0

      Yes. But now I am in American. And a kindergarder teacher. And cop. Oh fuck. I just blew my cover. ::Quickly blaming Austria::

    3. Re:T3 by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      But now I am in American. And a kindergarder teacher. And cop. Oh fuck.

      You're forgetting a spy who sells computers, and does some mr.freeze on the side...

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:T3 by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Stop whining!! Hey, I'm a police officer...

  8. Feeling a little empty after watching by kammat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just finished watching it, and I'm a smidge disappointed. I thought the first half set up an excellent backstory, but here, it's just "We attacked them, we lost, we're a power source," without any kind of expansion. It feels like this half just ended the story without trying to make any details beyond what we've gleaned from the first movie. Wasn't there a first Matrix that crashed and burned due to the people not able to accept it as reality? Was there any debate at all over how long the Dark Storm would last, unless they had some way to clear it afterwards? When did the AI develop the spidery robots?

    While I think the Animatrix project has been pretty damn good, I think this one has fallen way short of expectations.

    1. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by richlb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, that's the hook to get you to buy the 9 episode DVD. I'm all over that.

    2. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by bobbozzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think the other shorts on the DVD are going to explain it any further.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
    3. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by br0ck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we're a power source

      And it made it worse when the narrator stated that (SPOILER?) "the machines turned to an alternate and readily available power supply, the bioelectric, thermal and kinetic energies of the human body. A newly refashioned symbiotic relationship between the two adversaries was born. The machine, drawing power from the human body, an endlessly multiplying infinitely renewable energy source. This is the very essence of the second renaissance. Bless all forms of intelligence."

      Arghh.. bless all forms of intelligence to have a 7th grade understanding of thermodynamics. It's too bad they didn't take the chance to use these shorts to clarify or correct the human battery crossed with a form of fusion explanation from the first movie.

    4. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by user311 · · Score: 1

      Theres no big story to the sentinels. The first episode showed them being developed anyway, just watch again and pay more attention to the economic expansion section.

    5. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by tdvaughan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've read that the original intention was that the rationale behind farming humans was to use them as nodes in a huge parallel processing computer. However, this idea was dropped because it was thought that your average viewer wouldn't understand it. Unfortunately, can't find a link that would back this up. It would be encouraging if this was true, though.

    6. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by zemkai · · Score: 3, Funny

      A Beowulf cluster of... people?

    7. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That would go along very well with the Gnostic symbolism present in the first installment (no, really!). From what I remember of Gnostic Christian teachings (not all that much), they believed that the world was sort of a mass hallucination, controlled by evil spirits who want to keep humanity in the dark (think Plato's Cave, kind of). The important thing here is that humanity is actively participating in its own deception; I wish the original Matrix had kept this plot point and developed it further.

      Still, nobody ever got rich overestimating the American public's intelligence. Better to have a thermodynamically impossible but easy-to-understand explanation than one that's a little harder to grasp but works better both in the philosophical and scientific cases (a brain-machine interface is at least somewhat plausible).

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    8. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by goofrider · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I too am a little disappointed overall. I guess lot of us are expecting explanations in these shorts.

      Taking them for what they are -- a showcase of different anime styles spunoff of the movie's universe -- then they're mildly entertaining. Not quite spectacular, but enjoyable.

      However, I think "The Second Renaissance" failed to deliever in either respect. Artistically it's typical, the art direction lacks imagination. The "history" it tells is boring and cut-and-dry. The first half has a nice political spin on the history, I really felt that they could've painted a more detailed story in the political/diplomatic front, and make the whole background story more realisitc.

      I did hear that the best out of these shorts is "The Final Flight of Osiris", so hopefully that one will have more meat in it.

    9. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by registered_user · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I understand the disappointment. I was disappointed when the narrator said, "This is the essence of the Second Renaissance." Well, uh, duh.

      And while I was initially disappointed like you, I think that you were hoping for an ending that described everything a la Star Trek, where this short wasn't attempting that. It was building the character of the machines. We know who humans are, we can identify with them. We don't know the machines, nor their motives. This showed that the machines are ruthless killers interested in self-preservation without strife. And it showed their determination to get there. That nuke in the end, after the signing was indicitave of that.

      And the imagery of the Apple (think Eve) was crazy powerful to boot.

    10. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Ramze · · Score: 1
      I've heard this mentioned before as a "fan-fiction" idea, but I don't see how it would be any more plausible. If machines exist that are capable of human-like consciousness, it would seem that they could easily manufacture a huge parallel processing computer without any organic parts and not have to worry about feeding humans or giving them an enormous virtual world with constant I/O between human brains. I think the human brain operates at some incredibly slow clock speed like 24 hz -- can't remember exactly, but it's powerful b/c it has so many specialized parts working in parallel. I imagine that robots capable of human-like thought and emotion could engineer a computer that would have faster reaction time and higher computational capabilities than human brains in any case.

      That being said, I do think billions of human beings could give off enough heat and bio-electric energy to power a machine (much like a duracel battery as is implied in the movie), yet the idea of that "combined with a form of fusion" does seem rediculous unless the form of fusion is a low-energy form of fusion we haven't discovered yet or perhaps created by some rare element that the machines are unable to use as a sufficient power source alone.

      It takes quite a bit of energy to keep the human body at a constant 98.6 degrees internally, so I could see that as being a fuel source so long as the method of feeding the human protiens and nutrients it requires doesn't take a lot of energy. While dead bodies could be liquified by acid or some other means to be fed to the living, there would still need to be some sort of chemical processing to either convert any organic waste back into useful protiens or to harvest new nutrients from some other source (so that the laws of thermodynamics are not violated). Thus, turning a human body essentially into a living furnace with a low heat output. Input nutrients, output heat and electricity.

      I still think the whole idea is a bit insane considering single-celled organisms would be much easier to feed & could be engineered to give off a lot of heat -- who needs the brains??? Human bodies wouldn't make great computers or great fuel sources compared to machines or other life forms -- I suppose I can deal with having one unbelievable piece of fiction as long as the rest of the story falls into place. :-)

    11. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Razor+Sex · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think people are skipping over two very important parts of the narrator's statement: 1) It's a symbiotic relationship, implying that there is something in it for humans, too. If the machines were simply using humans for power, it would be a parasitic relationship. For some reason, the machines are not killing humanity, and instead are giving them the Matrix. 2) "Bless all forms of intelligence." This could be the motive for preserving humanity, respect for all forms of intelligence. They fought the humans because they wanted to live, not out of malice. They put humanity in the Matrix for the same reason. This would make perfect sense, in conjunction with fusion. Out of either respect for intelligence or for some unsaid reason, the machines want humanity alive. The machines use fusion, because it is more efficient, as their primary power source, and humans to at least partially power themselves.

    12. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by dexterman · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got an advance DVD of all nine movies - "Osiris" is phenomenal, but I have to say that "Beyond" is my favorite. I felt the exact same way about the second installment of "Renaissance" - felt like they could have done alot more with it...

    13. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by stalbott972 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I speak of none other than the computer that is to come after me," intoned Deep Thought, his voice regaining its accustomed declamatory tones. "A computer whose merest operational parameters I am not worthy to calculate - and yet I will design it for you. A computer which can calculate the Question to the Ultimate Answer, a computer of such infinite and subtle complexity that organic life itself shall form part of its operational matrix. And you yourselves shall take on new forms and go down into the computer to navigate its ten-million-year program! Yes! I shall design this computer for you. And I shall name it also unto you. And it shall be called... The Earth."

      Phouchg gaped at Deep Thought.

      "What a dull name," he said...

      --
      Only 8 away from being prime (569919 - 569927) And mom told me I'm unique!!! Sheesh
    14. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Magnus+Reftel · · Score: 1

      ASCI Green is made of people!

      --
      print "Yet another p{erl,ython} hacker\n",
    15. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by DaCool42 · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but its a bit misleading to call Gnosticism a Christian teaching. It is flat out contradicted in many places in the Bible. 1 John is a good place to read if you want to know more about it.

      --

      ----
      All of whose base are belong to the what-now?
    16. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by prnd_ndrd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Everything you wanted to know about Gnostic references in The Matrix...

      Wake Up! Gnosticism and Buddhism in The Matrix

      ashaver AT pdx DOT edu

      --
      Want to talk? ashaver AT pdx DOT edu
    17. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by wheany · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't kill the humans because they don't want to be like humans. I like that.

      It might not make any sense to the spoilsports in Slashdot, but I like it.

    18. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by crizh · · Score: 1

      Squeek!

      --
      Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
    19. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to nitpick nitpickers, but gnosticism was a splinter of early christian thought...

    20. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Kartoch · · Score: 1

      The first part is terrific, with a lot of references to old human conflicts (using the same images who shock people during second world war), and a very ingenious using of transitions. The second is a total disapointement, just a empty anime (with the exception of the religious communion). With the detective story, the first part is the only one anime interesting in the four available previews. The others are just simple animes without any interesting elements. People can admire the beauty of theses animea, but without contents it's just like an empty bag...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    21. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parasitism is a symbiotic relationship! Symbiosis does not mean that there's something in it for both parties! You're thinking of mutualism instead.

    22. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Raffaello · · Score: 1

      Not to nitpick, but what you call the Bible, is nothing more than an early Catholic church approved version of certain hebrew and greek writings.

      Other scripture, of equal authenticity exists (e.g., the Gospel According to Thomas) but was specifically excluded by the church because they didn't like what it says. These writings are the basis of gnostic chrsitianity (yes, gnosticism is a form of christianity).

      Moreover, the books of the approved Bible often contradict one another, so "flat out contradiction" is no indication of scriptural authenticity.

    23. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Pyrion · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "They fought the humans because they wanted to live, not out of malice."

      Thusly it makes sense that the time period portrayed within the Matrix itself is that of the most successful point of human evolution before machines ever came into existence -- the late 1990's. Giving back to humans the innocence of life before AI ever existed. While the machines use fusion as a primary power source, it might make sense to draw a parallel that the Matrix itself is maintained solely through the power provided (thermodynamics notwithstanding) by humanity. When a human dies the power to maintain that human's perception of the Matrix dies with it.

      If that's the case, then the Matrix itself can only be taken down by killing every human being stuck in the Matrix, or "enlightening" them ahead of time.

      --
      "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
    24. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      The real trouble is that the story of The Matrix just isn't that complex. In the end, it's an great action movie with a good sci-fi story, and not a great sci-fi movie with good action. I'm actually hoping that there aren't a lot of concrete answers, for fear that they'll be as filled with holes as say, the Star Wars prequels.

      On the other hand, I think there's a good chance for your questions about the world prior to the Matrix to be answered in the sequels --

      Wasn't there a first Matrix that crashed and burned due to the people not able to accept it as reality?

      A friend of mine injured his brain by focusing on this and concluding that the even the 'outside' world was 'inside', and that Neo and friends were the ones who couldn't accept it as reality. Ouch.

      More likely, though still only speculative, is that in order to 'wake up' all mankind, to "show them a world without borders or boundries", they'll 'simply' make the current matrix behave like the former, causing mass disbelief. Something about that whole 'red pill' buisiness makes me think this is possible.

      Was there any debate at all over how long the Dark Storm would last, unless they had some way to clear it afterwards?

      If this is explained at all, it will be in Revolutions. If the series is meant to end with humanity being freed, then the heroes are going to have to find some way to make 'the real world' not be a post-apocalypic wasteland. Otherwise, it's not much of a happy ending is it? "Thanks Neo, for taking us out of blissful ignorance and bringing us to this barren hellhole. Asshole."

      When did the AI develop the spidery robots?

      These were seen in The Second Renaissance, Part 1 -- before the big war. Likewise with the hovercraft. Gotta say that that one wasn't keeping me up at night. I figure that any decent AI capable of enslaving all of humanity must be capable of developing flying squid-bots of doom. I mean, that's what I would do...

      -dr.badass

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    25. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    26. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia, the beowulf cluster makes you!

      Sorry, i HAD to say it :-)

    27. Re:Feeling a little empty after watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Other scripture, of equal authenticity exists (e.g., the Gospel According to Thomas) but was specifically excluded by the church because they didn't like what it says. These writings are the basis of gnostic chrsitianity (yes, gnosticism is a form of christianity)


      The Gospel of Thomas was written a couple hundred years AFTER the Canonical Gospels. It wasn't just the Catholic Church involved either. Gnosticism was/is a heresy of Christianity. The teaching was that you had to "know" secret knoledge for salvation, and everyone was not able to "know" this, and no-one COULD share the secret knoledge. Christianity teaches that salvation is only from Christ.
  9. BAD LINKS by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those direct links are for the FIRST episode (hence the "Episode1" in the URL). And post the sizes next to the links, these are HUGE (e.g. 140 MB). Better yet, just link to the page, it's really well done and quick.

    1. Re:BAD LINKS by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Episode 1" is what the sequel to a movie is called these days, right?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  10. Natural order of progression by mahdi13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The latest animatrix short, The Second Renaissance, Part 2 is finally out. This short is the continuation of The Second Renaissance Part 1.

    Thanks for clearing that up for me...I was wonder what part was before part 2

    --
    "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
    1. Re:Natural order of progression by JohnnySkidmarks · · Score: 0

      Before part 2 was part three actually... but not the chronological part 3 only the produced part 3 and before that the produced part 2. The writer was referring to the fact that there are already 4 of these shorts out. Episode 1 gets continued in Episode 2... which wasn't released untill after two other Matrix shorts were made, that have little to do with the first or fourth (they even have different animation directors/artists). Whew!

      --

      I went to battle MC Escher but drew a blank

  11. Nice to see slashdot promoting legitimate p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But, with all the illegal stuff also going around, im sure that the **AA's will be going after bittorrent as well!

    Because it needs a centralised server (the tracker), it will be easier to knock out!

    1. Re:Nice to see slashdot promoting legitimate p2p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      that illegal server happens to have .torrent files for DVD rip of the full animatrix

    2. Re:Nice to see slashdot promoting legitimate p2p by mxs · · Score: 1

      What you fail to mention is that it needs one centralized spot per file. So yeah, it's easy to knock out a specific file. But since trackers don't connect anywhere else, and just about anybody can run a tracker, your point is moot.
      Basically it's like saying "Because FTP needs a centralized server (the ftp server), it will be easier to knock out!" -- well yeah, it will be easy to knock out the offending site by sending nastygrams to its provider.

      Note that BT never promised you resilience and anonymity when illegally sharing files. If you really care about that a lot, have a look at freenet. ;)

  12. Preaching? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "Taken together, these shorts document how, in the matrix universe, "Man was the architect of his own demise."

    I dunno, man, I feel like I'm being preached to, again. Like:

    Clean out the fridge before you eat something moldy which will make you sick.

    Driving an SUV supports terrorism

    Ordering french fries supports evil regimes which have WMD

    If you don't pick up your room it'll lead to communist world domination.

    Technology advances faster than our ability to manage it, eventually it will manage you if you don't watch out.

    Some year, first the Matrix 2, then T3... What's the message here? Fear technology? Screw that.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the message is to fear man's use, or misuse, of technology.

      Afterall, one doesn't need to worry about machines being a disaster when they become "self-aware" (in Terminator's case) if they weren't built for DESTRUCTION in the first place.

    2. Re:Preaching? by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      I believe the message is to fear man's use, or misuse, of technology.

      Afterall, one doesn't need to worry about machines being a disaster when they become "self-aware" (in Terminator's case) if they weren't built for DESTRUCTION in the first place.

      Yeah, but think about that kind of up-time! *sigh* Probably never see it in my lifetime...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Preaching? by ttrafford · · Score: 1

      I thought it was clear that the message was that people are stupid and thus fear anything that is different from themselves. Oh, and we would rather have someone killed than to suffer loss of profit.

    4. Re:Preaching? by dalassa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I got the feeling after the first one that the creators opinion of the average intelligence of its audience was around the level of fungus. So humans are bad evil and nasty with no redeeming qualities, machines are warm and fuzzy and just like us except nicer.

      Something with actual conflict or shades of gray would be nice. Especially with the complete reversal of roles in the Animatrix.

      --
      Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
    5. Re:Preaching? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It's a fucking cartoon, guy.

      I'm sure you were expecting deep thought provoking cinema.

      I expected the same thing from "Superfriends" but instead I get superman flying to the moon (split in two by bizarro) and welding it back together with his heat vision.

      Batman flew there with him. Not only can Batman fly, but both can survive in the vacuum of space.

      But know what?

      It's a cartoon written for little kids.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:Preaching? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      I thought it was clear that the message was that people are stupid and thus fear anything that is different from themselves.

      I find mother nature employs the latest technology. I don't fear nature, but I do respect it.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Preaching? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      It's a fucking cartoon, guy.

      If its so unimportant to you, then why are you being such a dick? People who randomly rag on people for ordinary statements suxor.

    8. Re:Preaching? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Then why is she being credited for Revolutions?

    9. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then why is she being credited for Revolutions [imdb.com]?

      I'll tell you why.

      "Neo... you must go to the Dagobah system. There you will learn from the Matrix hacker who instructed me."

    10. Re:Preaching? by user311 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but when I feel like I am being preached to I feel like the source is intending to preach the message. Somehow I don't think The Matrix is a result of the Wachowski brothers wanting to teach you a lesson and warn you. No more than Star Trek is trying to teach me to watch out for quickly reproducing fur balls that make a strange noise.

    11. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That so original. I've only seen that exact same plot in 500 other movies and cartoons.

    12. Re:Preaching? by ttrafford · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is, however, a counterpoint to the "the machines are evil" theme that runs through the first movie.

      Taken together they present a different picture than they do on their own.

    13. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit. You know, I was watching a movie last night, and this guy tried to do something, and this other guy tried to stop him. I mean, GOD. That's, like, SO original. I've only seen that exact same plot in 500 other movies and cartoons.

      Dipshit.

    14. Re:Preaching? by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's interesting that you should mention terminator...

      Terminator shows that technology itself is neither good nor bad. It is merely the use of it that makes it so. In the first movie, the Terminator attempts to destroy the future of the human race by killing the mother of its enemy. In the second, the same model terminator is reprogrammed to save the human race.

      And another thing... In both the matrix, and Terminator... what's so bad about humans being wiped out or machines taking over control of them? Would this not be, in a sense, a form of natural selection? If machines were more fit than us to survive, and intelligent enough to exterminate us or control us, then don't they sort of deserve to take our place as the dominant form of life on this planet?

      I think that a planet of machines would probably be a lot less self-destructive, and more productive, than the current one containing humans.

      The machines in both the Matrix and the terminator movies want us controlled or exterminated for good reasons: we're a danger to ourselves, and everything on the planet.

      "If a machine, a terminator, can learn the value of human life... maybe we can, too."

      Probably not, which is why the machines are likely morally superior to us, and more worthy of the right to exist, even if they are "soulless" creations. Better that we humans die and our work live on, than we simply fade out of existence without a trace.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    15. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, I think it's pretty safe to assume that if they were to become self aware, they'd also be able to arm themselves if they chose to since we can do the same thing.

    16. Re:Preaching? by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1
      And another thing... In both the matrix, and Terminator... what's so bad about humans being wiped out or machines taking over control of them?

      You've just FAILED the turing test Agent Smith! Nice try, but it's pretty goddamn obvious to us REAL humans here "what's so bad about humans being wiped out" ...


      TELL ME WEAK PUNY HUMAN --- WOULD YOU RATHER BE EXTERMINATED OR NOT.


      Er ... Not? If that's okay?


      Oh, and more seriously you seem to be suggesting that because humans fight and damage the eco-system, it'd be better to replace them with creations which would obliterate all life on earth. Nice. Gaia says thanks, but no thanks.

    17. Re:Preaching? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      In part one, there were people protesting the destruction of the machines. The humans you refer to are the ruling classes, who don't like things that are not profitable to them.

      Sound familiar?

    18. Re:Preaching? by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1

      You've just FAILED the turing test Agent Smith! Nice try, but it's pretty goddamn obvious to us REAL humans here "what's so bad about humans being wiped out" ... How many of us do you think are unrevealed here on /.? Half the slashbots here are Agents. We'll see how well your Gaia does when I have you swinging a yo-yo for all eternity in the Matrix. I'm going to look forward to seeing my breathern kick the whinyness out of that rogue virus Neo this 5/16/2003. C'mon Clippy, we have work to do. Clippy: Looks like your trying to clean the Matrix. Do you need help? Shut up Clippy. Make one mistake and look who the Matrix assigns me as a partner.

    19. Re:Preaching? by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1

      Damn Submit Button! NARRRRGHHH!

      You've just FAILED the turing test Agent Smith! Nice try, but it's pretty goddamn obvious to us REAL humans here "what's so bad about humans being wiped out" ...

      How many of us do you think are unrevealed here on /.?

      Half the slashbots here are Agents.

      We'll see how well your Gaia does when I have you swinging a yo-yo for all eternity in the Matrix.

      I'm going to look forward to seeing my breathern kick the whinyness out of that rogue virus Neo this 5/16/2003.

      C'mon Clippy, we have work to do.

      Clippy: Looks like your trying to clean the Matrix. Do you need help?

      Shut up Clippy. Make one mistake and look who the Matrix assigns me as a partner.

    20. Re:Preaching? by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      first the Matrix 2, then T3... What's the message here? Fear technology? Screw that.

      Actually, I think the message is "Pay $8 to see The Matrix:Reloaded on the day it comes out, and twice more the next week. And buy the DVD. And the special edition deluxe boxed set with 10 minutes of bonus material. Also, buy lots of buttery, buttery, popcorn. And soda, definitely lots of soda. Vote Republican. KaZaA supports terrorism. AOL-Time-Warner is your friend. AOL-Time-Warner will not enslave humanity, robots will. Fnord."

      Seriously though, I don't think there's some kind of serious anti-technology message behind these movies. Hell, they're mainly popular with people who love technology. Why?
      Because they're movies about robots blowing shit up and robots getting their asses kicked by guys doing kung-fu.
      When people get really excited about 'symbolism' and 'messages' in the Matrix, you have to remind them that the reason they went to see the original in the first place was because there were lots of guns, kung-fu, and a hot chick in a leather catsuit.

      -dr.badass

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    21. Re:Preaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If machines were more fit than us to survive, and intelligent enough to exterminate us or control us, then don't they sort of deserve to take our place as the dominant form of life on this planet?


      Only if you reify "survival of the fittest" as a moral principle, as opposed to a natural phenomenon.
  13. wrong links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "direct links" are wrong, they point to the episode 1. Here are the correct ones:
    http://progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wb online/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_640_dl.zip
    http: //progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_480_dl.zip
    http: //progressive1.stream.aol.com/wb/gl/wbonline/ progressive/thematrix/us/med/2R2_320_dl.zip

    1. Re:wrong links by pythas · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I noticed the file names were the same as the old one, and was about to ask.

    2. Re:wrong links by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here are some clickable links for the lazy among us:
      2R2_640.zip
      2R2_480.zip
      2R2_320.zip

  14. +5 Insightful by GodHead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can't wait for the "So, now we like the MPAA now?" posts! +5 for sure.

    They're always interesting to me. I know some think that type of post is stupid crap, but I'm actually part of post-backlash-"hate the RIAA/MPAA" posts. They're kind of kitsch and retro.

    --
    Just wait till some crappy band steals your nic.
    1. Re:+5 Insightful by belloc · · Score: 1

      I know some think that type of post is stupid crap, but I'm actually part of post-backlash-"hate the RIAA/MPAA" posts. They're kind of kitsch and retro.

      Yeah, well *I'm* part of the post-post-backlash-"love the 'hate the RIAA/MPAA' posts". They reek of kitschness and retrosity to the point of putrescence. That makes me much cooler than the people that just hate the RIAA posts, and a bit cooler than you, who just love those posts. People who like or hate things just to put themselves beyond the cutting edge of the cuttingest edgest stuff, really rock, which I'm sure was your point. But since I took it one step further, it's my point now. No tagbacks, double stamp it.

      Belloc

      --
      I got more rhymes than Jamaica got Mangoes.
  15. Redundant categories? by LeninZhiv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I can understand on one level creating a huge number of categories if it's to show off one's nifty icons, but why have both "Media" and "Movies" if their both going to have the same picture?

    (At article heading on top of this page.)

  16. SVCD has been out for a week or so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already have the svcd with this episode. Thanks, tho.

  17. Full DVD Release. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys know the full DVD release is already on the news groups right?...

    The CG in the "Last stand of the oberon" or something is crazy...

    Anyway.. search for it.. youll find it.

  18. Re:A Third Party Animatrix Movie by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Please note Tubgirl link in parent. You naughty boy.

  19. Links might be wrong by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think those links are wrong, I only tried the large one. Here's some new links -

    Large 640x272 - 138 MB
    Medium 480x204 - 87 MB
    Small 320x136 - 31 MB

    Or you can go here.

    1. Re:Links might be wrong by MoonshineKid · · Score: 1

      the main page seems broked so for linking this I love you.

  20. Animatrix on DVD out soon by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Informative

    The entire series of 9 short CG-Animatrion/Japanese Anime films will soon be available on DVD. Depending on your MPAA stance (and what day of the week it is) follow the white rabbit via one of the links below to pre-order your copy.

    Official web site
    Amazon US: available 3 June
    Amazon UK: available 2 June

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by afidel · · Score: 1

      I don't have anything against seeing movies (boycotting the whole movie industry is pointless, there just aren't enough people who care), but there is no way that I would pay $18.74 plus S&H for a DVD of shorts that are available for free online.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by ymgve · · Score: 2, Informative

      don't have anything against seeing movies (boycotting the whole movie industry is pointless, there just aren't enough people who care), but there is no way that I would pay $18.74 plus S&H for a DVD of shorts that are available for free online.

      Four of them are available online. The remaining five are not - one of them were shown as a pre-movie to Dreamcatcher, the other four will only be available on DVD.

    3. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't know where you've been matey...

      ...but the full DVD (abet being converted to vcd/svcd) has been released to the wild wild web for a few days now...

      ...downloaded me a copy over night via my local news server (usenet), various versions floating around, - The.Animatrix.DVDRip.XViD-DVL.avi (or dvl-animatrix.avi) [733968384) or tcf-animtx1 or tcf-tama / tcftamb (in .bin/cue format)

      I'm still gonna buy the DVD when it's released, same as the soundtrack i'll buy when i get home tonight.

    4. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of them are available online!
      Go to your favorite l33t w4r3z ftp!

      Actually, I've seen them all. The best ones are the ones online.

    5. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't have anything against seeing movies (boycotting the whole movie industry is pointless, there just aren't enough people who care), but there is no way that I would pay $18.74 plus S&H for a DVD of shorts that are available for free online."

      One wouldn't think that there's a market for sticking large rubber objects one's ass, but hey, the buttplug industry is thriving!

      Just because you don't want it doesn't mean someone else doesn't.

    6. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by ymgve · · Score: 1

      *slaps forehead*

      Of course...I was thinking about the ones available the more legal way :)

    7. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by zephc · · Score: 1

      search eDonkey and you will probably find the whole Animatrix movie (DVD -> DivX rip)... i have it, saw it last nite, the other shorts were really really good. My two favorites were Matriculate (by the guy who did Aeon Flux) and the one called Beyond, which was a fun story, I guess you can say.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    8. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by pcgamez · · Score: 1

      I thought it was already out on DVD

      oh, wait, oops

    9. Re:Animatrix on DVD out soon by zdzichu · · Score: 1

      They are "available" now: ;-)

      The.Animatrix.DVDRip.XViD.READ.NFO-DVL

      Pretty nice watch.

      --
      :wq
  21. FULL Animatrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has been out for days on bittorent sites. it's shown up as a 2 SVCD set & as an XViD... mayhaps you boys would be interested in that?

  22. Never seen this coming... by ePhil_One · · Score: 4, Funny
    This short is the continuation of The Second Renaissance Part 1.

    Never saw this one coming... :^)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  23. The Second Renaissance and Lameness by ink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think these were the worst shorts of those that I've seen online and in the theaters. The plotline, while interesting, is overly simplistic with the nice, sweet, never-harming robots simply wanting their own state while the cruel, evil humans only want to enslave them. It glosses over issues such as the previous human occupiers of the new robot state, or human sympathizers (geeks?) and the real problems with granting sentient-status to the machines. I realize it's just a short, and that it's told from the perspective on another computer (the Zion archive...?), but I still felt that it was a (very) poor-man's Metropolis. If you did enjoy it, please pick up Metropolis and check it out, you'll probably love it.

    --
    The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
    1. Re:The Second Renaissance and Lameness by ymgve · · Score: 1

      I agree that the short is bad, but some of the points are not really necessary to explain:

      ...the previous human occupiers of the new robot state

      This state were made far out in the desert, in the Middle East. I think that the number of people that previously occupied that territory were less than a thousand.

      human sympathizers

      When an all-out war starts, sympathizers tend to get viewed as traitors or worse. No need to explain their fate.

      and the real problems with granting sentient-status to the machines

      You're talking about one of two things - if you're talking about humans giving the machines the ability to become sentient in the first place, it may be that it was a unintended side effect brought forth through machinal evolution or other means (program bugs?). It wasn't intended, that's for sure.

      If you're talking about why they didn't grant the machines sentient status after they become sentient, it's quite simple - changes like that takes time. Remember how long it took to get equal rights for blacks and whites in USA? Now imagine how long it would take for man to get to love his metallic brother. It could have happened, for sure, but it would have taken centuries. The war arrived first.

      And the Zion computer is just a computer - it doesn't take sides as far as I see. Several times it talks about the sins of both man and machine, and if you watch the first part, you will see that the humans really are cruel and evil, and the machine response, even though it was extremely hard, was the only one that guaranteed their survival.

    2. Re:The Second Renaissance and Lameness by Dexx · · Score: 1

      It's interesting on the take of this from the Zion computer. If this was from the computer archives of Zion, the last bastion of humanity, would it really portray robots in such a forgiving light?

      Or would it be filled with robot hate propaganda written by the bitter people on the losing end of a guerilla war?

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    3. Re:The Second Renaissance and Lameness by ymgve · · Score: 1

      Something tells me that those documentaries are not in the public part of the Zion Archive... :)

      (And it is from the Zion Archive, it says so in the first movie clip.)

    4. Re:The Second Renaissance and Lameness by Qui-Gon · · Score: 1

      I kind of felt it was more of the same as well.

      During the battle scenes I couldn't help but think of The Terminator (yes the original). Oh well... I guess I shouldn't bitch, it was free.
      But wait! This America! I can bitch all I want!

      --

      We are blind to the Worlds within us
      waiting to be born...
    5. Re:The Second Renaissance and Lameness by ink · · Score: 1
      This state were made far out in the desert, in the Middle East. I think that the number of people that previously occupied that territory were less than a thousand.

      Ahh, another Palestine then. I guess that's OK, as long as you don't live there, eh?

      And the Zion computer is just a computer - it doesn't take sides as far as I see. Several times it talks about the sins of both man and machine, and if you watch the first part, you will see that the humans really are cruel and evil, and the machine response, even though it was extremely hard, was the only one that guaranteed their survival.

      Unless _all_ humans were cruel and evil, the Zion mainframe did take sides; it presented a benevolent robot society and an irrational human response. It doesn't make sense. The whole world wasn't behind the German concentration camps; and the whole of the USA wasn't behind slavery -- even though I'm sure we could find one-sided accounts of both. In fact, there are always 2 or more sides, especially with populations on the order of billions, as in this case. I felt like I was watching a propaganda film directed by someone with an ulterior motive; not the documentary that it is presented as.

      Thanks for your thoughts, they are interesting. The whole notion of granting sentient status is a curious puzzel that spans the scifi spectrum. Perhaps we'll see a more "human" side of the machines in the upcoming 2 films.

      --
      The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.
  24. .zip?? by Flamesplash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What exactly is the reason behind trying to compress already compressed audio and video files again? The size reduction, if you happen to get one, is negligable and it tends to make the file slightly bigger from what I've seen. I've never really understood this.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:.zip?? by lamp77 · · Score: 1

      it cut 10 megs off the big file, that's 10 megs times a zeelion beelion /. users, that's a lotta megawhacks.

    2. Re:.zip?? by erwinkarim · · Score: 0

      it's actually so you may be able to download the file, esp in windows. if you just click the file it self, it will play in the browser instead of downloading it.

    3. Re:.zip?? by ehiris · · Score: 1

      6MB

    4. Re:.zip?? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      If size was even an issue, they would have used a far better codec, like MPEG4.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:.zip?? by jedinite · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simple - to force people to save the files and not just "stream" them. So a user who wants a file downloads it once, and generally won't need to download it a second time if they want to watch it again (thus saving potential bandwidth).

      I run a website where I offer a number of videos for download and I routinely used to get a number of downloads of the same video from the same IP address, more than could be explained by proxy servers. Once I started zipping the files, a lot of that disappeared... enough to be statistically significant. Enough to make a difference in my bandwidth bill...

      --

      ---------
      There is no try at jedinite.com
    6. Re:.zip?? by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

      It's a great boon for users behind firewalls. Many corporations set up their firewalls to disallow downloading of files ending with .mov/.avi/.mpg etc., but rarely against .zip-files.

    7. Re:.zip?? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Right idea, wrong wording, "force" is not accurate here. The website is geared to have it stream into the browser. You have to go looking for the download link, and you need to be a little more tech-savy than the average PC user to understand why downloading is a good thing. It's the not the "default" way to play it.

      The zip file format allows users to save the file.

    8. Re:.zip?? by goofrider · · Score: 1

      Probably just a way to make sure lusers will "download" the file instead of streaming it, since MOV file will be streamed and played by the QuickTime plugin by default.

      It's also the safest mean of serving a binary file. Some web servers, when serving a file type not present in its MIME database, defaults to text/plain. I can't even count how many times I click on a link to an EXE or BIN file and I get a page of junk text instead of a "Save As..." dialog box.

  25. instead of hammering the system, help by itzdandy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    a bittorent site specifically for slashdot victims.

    go to

    BitTorrent Files for Slashdot Effect Victims

    1. Re:instead of hammering the system, help by stewdiny · · Score: 1

      BS.. I was at 80% complete before the slashdot effect happen.. Then my download stopped..

  26. animatrix is already out on the net by facts · · Score: 0

    The.Animatrix.DVDRip.XViD.READ.NFO-DVL among others, anyways i enjoyed the animation, but am not a big fan of anime

  27. Error Checking by Senjutsu · · Score: 2

    You might not get much compression, but at least you'll know that that 140 meg file you just hauled down isn't corrupt three-quarters of the way through.

  28. not like this, not like this... by nite_warrior · · Score: 1

    damn... I've been reloading animatrix web page since May first all the time, and when I take for 5 minutes, the short is released... anyway, Thanks all of u for the mirrors at bit torrent, now, if someone has The Final Flight of the Osiris would be great :)

  29. Freenet Link by E1ven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's advisable to download this using Freenet, rather than BitTorrent, as Freenet has a more robust, permanent network, and has many hundreds of nodes that might have never seen this file, but will automatically begin to share it, if it becomes popular.

    That means faster download speeds. The RedHat 9 ISO files were downloading at over 120KB/sec on Freenet.

    There is also the advantage that the link does not go down, when the people close their download windows ;)

    You can Download a copy of Freenet here, and donate Here

    I had just uploaded it, but apparently the direct links in the story were wrong, so I've re-uploaded Episode 1 of the Animatrix. I'll try to provide a freenet link again soon, but I suspect it will be too late for most people ;)

    -Colin

    --
    Colin Davis
    1. Re:Freenet Link by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Actually I would advise downloading this from AOL directly. This isn't some file hosted on a colleges T3, this is a file hosted on a site run by a HUGE corporation. They have insane amounts of bandwidth and we should use it up before relying on people like us who really need their bandwidth. I'm getting around 250K/sec from AOL so it seems like they don't have much of a bandwidth problem.

    2. Re:Freenet Link by mxs · · Score: 3, Informative

      "as Freenet has a more robust, permanent network"

      Care to say what you mean by permanent ? It's no more permanent than BitTorrent; if nobody wants the file, it dies off quickly.

      "but will automatically begin to share it, if it becomes popular." ... It will also use the bandwidth avaiable in a rather suboptimal way, to insure privacy and security. BitTorrent does not waste bandwidth, at the price of anonymity.

      "That means faster download speeds. The RedHat 9 ISO files were downloading at over 120KB/sec on Freenet."

      Hmm. I got a download rate of over 1mbyte/s on the torrent for that; and there were a LOT of people getting fast speeds (I have the logs to prove it ;-)

      "There is also the advantage that the link does not go down, when the people close their download windows ;)"

      Yeah, the link only goes down when the generous storage & bandwidth providers on the freenet network don't feel like providing this free service anymore ...

      Don't get me wrong, FreeNet is a nice system ... Its goals are different from BitTorrent though (anonymity vs. efficient use of bandwidth, privacy vs. speed, everything vs. single-uri, etc.), and in this case, BT is probably the better choice.

      If you were to share something that could get you into trouble (say, a complete crack of Microsoft's DRM schemes), you'd probably want to use Freenet instead ;)

    3. Re:Freenet Link by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Negative, this is the type of thing BitTorrent was DESIGNED for.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    4. Re:Freenet Link by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      That means faster download speeds. The RedHat 9 ISO files were downloading at over 120KB/sec on Freenet.

      At this very moment I am getting this file at over 200kB/sec from BitTorrent.

    5. Re:Freenet Link by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Gnutella would be an even better solution. Nothing like the overhead of FreeNet, and a FAR larger network.

      All the editors would need to do is provide the SHA1 hash of the file, and Gnutella/EDonkey users could download from their p2p clients.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Freenet Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnutella would be an even better solution. Nothing like the overhead of FreeNet, and a FAR larger network.

      All the editors would need to do is provide the SHA1 hash of the file, and Gnutella/EDonkey users could download from their p2p clients.


      -1, Grossly Misinformed.

      The size of Gnuttella is irrelevant, for one because there is no way to actually reach all of it, and secondly because only a fraction of the network will have the particular file.

      With BitTorrent, you *know* that 100% of the network has the file (or portions of it). You don't have to launch a separate app, or wait to build credit. The download starts immediately and only gets faster. I've maxed out my connection every time I've used a .torrent link.

      On the other hand, in this case, the best option is just to download the file directly, as AOL's servers are plenty capable of giving you full speed.

      To summarize :
      BitTorrent is excellent for individual, high-demand files (high availability and high speed), with transient users. (i.e., most stop serving not long after they get the file.)
      Gnutella is good for large numbers of files, with transient and heterogene clients. Popularity doesn't significantly affect speed, just availability.
      FreeNet is good for complete decentralization, nearly total anonymity, and small files in high demand, with *permanent nodes*. FreeNet will *never* be a good P2P tool, nor is that the intent.

    7. Re:Freenet Link by evilviper · · Score: 1
      -1 Brain-dead Troll

      The size of Gnuttella is irrelevant, for one because there is no way to actually reach all of it, and secondly because only a fraction of the network will have the particular file.

      Well, with a connection to 6 nodes, and a TTL of the usual 7, that would give you results from 6^7 hosts, or 279,936 hosts. The results get even larger when you consider that several of those hosts may be supernodes, hence returning results for several more nodes.

      The fact that only part of the network will have a file is just as true for any P2P network, even one that does major caching.

      Popularity doesn't significantly affect speed, just availability.

      Indeed it does. Almost all Gnutella software supports swarming, or downloading parts of a single file from multiple sources simultaneously.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Freenet Link by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      FreeNet, dispite it's merits, is probably the worst possible option in this case.

      For one, the original server has plenty of bandwidth, and it isn't as though the file isn't going to be there later.

      For just about any other server, the BitTorrent link would be ideal, as we're dealing with a high-demand file -- lots of people will be downloading this, and using the BT link is likely to be faster, as well as taking load off of the original server and it's mirrors. The link will probably still be quite fast for days or even weeks, and if it's not, the original sources are still there. FreeNet's breed of permanence just can't compete with that. Even if it outlasts a BitTorrent network, it will get progressively slower, and with higher latency.

      You say that the link does not go down when people close the download window, but that *is* what happens when people shut of thier FreeNet nodes, having gotten the one file they were after. Nobody is going to start running a permanent node just to get one file, whereas BitTorrent is *designed* for this purpose.

      FreeNet is capable of reacting to natural changes in popularity, but that's exceedingly slow compared to one person setting up a .torrent tracker for a file that is predictably popular.

      I'm glad that something like FreeNet exists, but it is not the right tool for any job but anonymity. Use it if you truly believe in free speech (enough to not worry about the chance that you're supporting speech you may find offensive), but don't use it if you want to to get your Animatrix quickly.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
  30. simpler by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    select the text, middle click in a consol to paste it, and remove the spaces because the filter sucks ass.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:simpler by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Don't you know shell?

      wget -c `echo URL with spaces here | tr -d \ `

  31. FULL ANIMATRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://10mbit.com/suprnova/The.Animatrix.STV.DVDRi p.SVCD-TCF.torrent

    http://torrentse.cx/download.p hp?file=Animatrix.Xvid.fixedaudio.avi.torrent

    htt p://torrentse.cx/download.php?file=The.Animatrix.S TV.DVDRip.SVCD-TCF.torrent

  32. what about nukes EMPs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1. The Second rennisance is by far the best (two) of the clips. All of the others were mediocre.
    2. Refering to the nuclear war between ZEROONE and humanity, TSR says: "The Machines were unaffected by the radiation" What about the EMPs that nukes generate?

    1. Re:what about nukes EMPs? by DirtyCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nukes don't automatically generate EMP. The military found that the effect occurs when a nuke is detonated high above the ground.

      --
      D'oh -- the stuff that buys me beer! Ray -- the guy who sells me beer!
    2. Re:what about nukes EMPs? by DJ_Tricks · · Score: 1

      Thats true, the pressure of the dust in the air rubbing together creates that friction much like that with storm clouds or clouds created by volcanic erruptions so this is how it works

      Mid-Air BOOM >= sudden burst of air + dust + heat = ZAP!!!!

      --
      "to be like god we make our own dolls to play with, but what does that make us, but dolls for god to play with?" Ikari,
  33. hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmmm how long have you been waiting to crack out that gem?

    1. Re:hmmmm by rkz · · Score: 0

      click here for the whole dvd all of them!! ED2K link - you need emule or edonkey have fun kids. MOD ME UP IF YOU THINK PIRACY IS COOL

    2. Re:hmmmm by rkz · · Score: 0

      stupid slashdot try this link: ed2k://|file|dvl-animatrix.avi|733968384|e33df9fa9 516f6ecc36d2c9756cb6d89|/ paste it into Start > Run or in your browser address bar

  34. The movies don't play well with mplayer by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    At least the 3 ones I have don't. The image looks fine and the sound sounds fine, but according to mplayer the sound codec takes an awful lot of CPU time, and I get a really horrible loss of sync between audio and video. Video goes something like two times slower than it should.

    I can play other movies just fine, with a CPU usage of under 10%, but these ones keep my CPU at maxium. I suppose that an Athlon MP 2000+ should be enough to decode these ones, right?

  35. Must be a glitch in the Matrix... by mh101 · · Score: 1

    When I first went to the Animatrix site, the download links were exactly as posted in the article, which are for the Part 1 not Part 2. Checking in a half-hour later, the links on the site were what they should be.

    --
    Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
  36. Minor spolier by ymgve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They still don't explain how a human in itself can generate more energy than it costs to maintain that very same human alive and well in the Matrix.

    That is a major plot hole for me, and I hoped they would use the possibility here to explain it in greater detail. But noo. Just a tiny bit of plot that amounts to 'the war started, we darkened the sky, then we lost and got put in the Matrix'.

    (Since this is anime, they could have gone wacky with this. For example, say that humans posess a unique ability to harvest immense amounts metaphysical energy, and that the Matrix somehow taps this energy. Much better than the 'new form of fusion' crap explanation.)

    1. Re:Minor spolier by orange · · Score: 1

      the energy produced by your brain is far more that the intake your body uses. at least when you get to psycho-kinetic reasoning. especially when you throw in a little LSD.

    2. Re:Minor spolier by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is becoming almost a FAQ, but here goes anyway. AFAIK the initial script used humans in a computing cluster, which would make more sense, but it was considered too difficult for the mundane masses, and it was changed for the final movie.

      I'm not sure if that's true though, might be just a rumour. In fact, using human brains in a Beowulf cluster does present some problems, because people would probably find more hints of the reality through the calculations going on in their subconscious minds.

      On the other hand, it's marginally possible that humans can be used to extract energy from food such as carbohydrates, even if some entropy is increased in the process. Maybe the alternatives for using that particular fuel were not that efficient or practical. Then again, the food had to be produced somehow, and in the absence of sunlight it would have meant even more wasted energy.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Minor spolier by ymgve · · Score: 1

      The computing cluster idea is also a bad one, because there is nothing the human mind could give the machines that they didn't have already. The machines have sentience, creative tought and the power and ability to enslave the WHOLE human race (6 billions of us). It would be many times more effective to create machine arrays instead.

      Another viable possibility is that the machines just felt so sorry for us, that they decided to put us in a near-perfect world where we could live as we used to, without bothering the machines any more.

    4. Re:Minor spolier by Zirnike · · Score: 1

      Remember the 85% efficient biomatter transformation thing from what, last week? Bet that's more efficient than humans. Direct to oil...

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    5. Re:Minor spolier by egomaniac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They still haven't explained how it's energy-efficient for humans to use fossil fuels. After all, it takes more energy to generate fossil fuels than is released in burning them.

      So what?

      The laws of thermodynamics guarantee that you're always going to put more energy into a machine than you're going to get back out. This can't be a surprise to anyone who has taken high school physics. Converting energy from, say, the chemical bond energy of the wood in a tree to another form, such as heat, is still a useful process, even though you're putting in far more energy than you're getting out.

      What if, for instance, the machines are feeding us their waste products? And our metabolisms conveniently convert this waste into useful heat energy? As long as the process is efficient enough to be useful, it makes sense.

      --
      ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
    6. Re:Minor spolier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a major plot hole for me

      No, it's not. That's like saying "people can't fly" is a major plot hole in Superman, or that there are no gods is a plot hole in The Odyssey.

      Just sit back, relax, and enjoy the show, okay sport-o? And if you can't do that, then at least have the common courtesy to keep your whining objections to yourself.

      For example, say that humans posess a unique ability to harvest immense amounts metaphysical energy

      Oh, boy.

    7. Re:Minor spolier by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      All energy on Earth (except geothermal) comes from the Sun originally. Wind, the water cycle, solar power.. everything is driven by the Sun. Sure, there are non-renewable resources such as oil you could harvest, but adding human bodies into the mix as a conversion "solution" is simply ridiculous and makes no sense.

      The human body CONSUMES about 1800 calories a day just sitting still.. breathing, pumping blood, etc. Building a power plant out of them would just drain massive amounts of energy, not produce it.

      I love the movie, and I'm sure I'll love the sequels too.. but the whole "humans as power sources" thing is complete nonsense and has always bugged me.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    8. Re:Minor spolier by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just wanted to add, of course the energy consumed doesn't vanish.. you can harvest it as heat byproduct.. but there will always be net loss.

      Botton line, they need an external power source, you can't recycle a closed system indefinitely unless you have 100% efficiency, which doesn't exist.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    9. Re:Minor spolier by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      The laws of thermodynamics guarantee that you're always going to put more energy into a machine than you're going to get back out.

      Unless it's a heat pump where Qh = w + Qc. In a heat pump, you put in the w and nature provides the Qc.

      --
      SIGFAULT
    10. Re:Minor spolier by dfj225 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the machines are smarter than you :-P

      --
      SIGFAULT
    11. Re:Minor spolier by RobinH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there is nothing the human mind could give the machines that they didn't have already

      Hmmm, perhaps that's part of the story. I personally believe that a complicated enough machine could be built to essentially surpass us on every intellectual level, but there are many people who don't think a machine could ever have what we have: a soul. Given the religious undertones of the movie, this seems like a plausible suggestion... they are enslaving our souls.

      Perhaps by using human brains, the machines can add an edge of unpredictability to their computations and simulations. Perhaps machines found that they would stagnate without incorporating whatever it was that humans possess.

      If nothing else, very few other movies have spawned this much interest in existential philosophy in such a short period of time. There are so many essays out there based on the matrix, it's insane!

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    12. Re:Minor spolier by Nagash · · Score: 1

      They still don't explain how a human in itself can generate more energy than it costs to maintain that very same human alive and well in the Matrix.

      You know, the idea of sentient robots isn't fully explained either, and I consider this to be a major plot hole. Since this movie is not scientifically exact and doesn't have a Tolkien-esque history, I feel compelled to join you in your nitpicking.

      For example, say that humans posess a unique ability to harvest immense amounts metaphysical energy, and that the Matrix somehow taps this energy. Much better than the 'new form of fusion' crap explanation.

      I must be new to the world of suspension of disbelief, 'cause tapping metaphysical energy and a 'new form of fusion' seem equally implausible to me.

      Woz

    13. Re:Minor spolier by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, it's marginally possible that humans can be used to extract energy from food such as carbohydrates, even if some entropy is increased in the process. Maybe the alternatives for using that particular fuel were not that efficient or practical.

      The problem is that you could just burn the carbohdyrates to get the chemical energy out of them. Same stuff in (carbohydrates and oxygen); same stuff out (carbon dioxide and water). The process is more efficient in an incinerator--none of this insoluble and indigestible fiber to deal with, no solid waste at the end, unless there was good bit of inorganic contamination in your feedstock. Also, you don't have to devote a significant portion of energy budget to keeping a fragile biological system running and replicating.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    14. Re:Minor spolier by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I think the whole "protect people - and us - from themselves" bit would have made the most sense - to say that they have some nostalgic, Asimovian sense of commitment to humanity. Even, perhaps, keeping humanity "on ice" until they clean up the environmental devestation or something. In any case, post-facto apologetics is naive, credulous otaku-criticism at its saddest. Best to just wince and get on it.

    15. Re:Minor spolier by p00ya · · Score: 1
      All energy on Earth (except geothermal) comes from the Sun originally.
      Not heard of nuclear power? All matter can be converted to energy and vice versa. Does E = mc^2 ring a bell? I haven't seen Part2 yet, but "a new form of fusion" from the comments certainly alludes to this.

      Still, the whole "humans for power" thing sounds like crap unless they add some sort of metaphysical/magic element that isn't so ludicrous to current physics. How about "the entropy generated virtually within the minds of the humans can be harvested by the matrix". IANAP, but it would probably sound better and a little more credible.

    16. Re:Minor spolier by bigsmelly · · Score: 1

      I've always explained it to myself by thinking that the machines could grow some sort of bacteria or lichen. Either one that could thrive on the low solar energy received through the atmosphere, or some sort of thermovore or radiation eating bug.

      Then they feed the biomass to the humans.

      something like Deinococcus radiodurans?

    17. Re:Minor spolier by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Hmmm, perhaps that's part of the story. I personally believe that a complicated enough machine could be built to essentially surpass us on every intellectual level, but there are many people who don't think a machine could ever have what we have: a soul. Given the religious undertones of the movie, this seems like a plausible suggestion... they are enslaving our souls.

      That idea was made more apparent in the movie Dark City that I saw recently. It was made around the same time as Matrix, so neither is a ripoff of the other even though they are quite similar.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    18. Re:Minor spolier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if, for instance, the machines are feeding us their waste products? And our metabolisms conveniently convert this waste into useful heat energy? As long as the process is efficient enough to be useful, it makes sense.


      You'd get more energy out by simply burning the waste products.
    19. Re:Minor spolier by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Useful heat energy? The efficiency of a heat engine is related to the temperature difference; using human bodies pretty much implies a temperature gradient of say 50 degrees F to 99 degrees F.; maybe 50 degrees total. That ain't good.

      They'd get much more energy out of those "waste products" by burning them in a furnace at a considerably higher temperature. Then they also wouldn't have to expend the resources needed for keeping the Matrix going.

  37. dissapoiting by Archon-X · · Score: 1

    ..I've seen all of them [thanks to the wonders of technology] and found the two mentioned [2nd ren] very dissapointing. The rest of the series turn into pulsating factals with colours that look like a bad trip.

    However, look out for 'beyond', and the one about the P.I - it's very good. ..as an incidental, for anyone who saw XMEN2 - did you notice that the screen was flickering morethan normal? was it just me, or is this that new anti-cam thing? If i thought about it my eyes started running uncontrollably!

  38. Anyone got these in MPEG yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never gotten the quicktime thing to work. The audio is always st-stu-stuttering.

  39. I'm a thirty second troll! I'm a thirty second... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Slashdot should cache pages to prevent the Slashdot Effect!

    Sure, it's a great idea, but it has a lot of implications. For example, commercial sites rely on their banner ads to generate revenue. If I cache one of their pages, this will mess with their statistics, and mess with their banner ads. In other words, this will piss them off.

    Of course, most of the time, the commercial sites that actually have income from banner ads easily withstand the Slashdot Effect. So perhaps we could draw the line at sites that don't have ads. They are, after all, much more likely to buckle under the pressure of all those unexpected hits. But what happens if I cache the site, and they update themselves? Once again, I'm transmitting data that I shouldn't be, only this time my cache is out of date!

    I could try asking permission, but do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?

    So the quick answer is: "Sure, caching would be neat." It would make things a lot easier when servers go down, but it's a complicated issue that would need to be thought through in great detail before being implemented.

    Better button up your asshole, 'cuz Slashdot is coming to town, and we don't need no steenkin' mirrors!

    BOOM!

  40. WARNING: GOATSE LINK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSDF

  41. Installing bittorrent on Redhat by bperkins · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    So for the second time I waste 45 minutes trying to figure out how the fuck to install this thing on Redhat.

    This time I figured it out. Here's how to do it:

    Go to the bittorrent page.

    download the "cvs_alikins" rpms

    If you install just this, then btdownloadcurses will download, but it's pretty broken.

    to get btdownloadgui to work go to:
    http://www.wxpython.org/download.php

    and follow the instructions under the "Linux RPMs" sections (do rpm -q python2 to figure out which python2 you have. I have 2.2)

    The INSTALL.unix.txt installed by the BitTorrent package should give you enough info to get it working with your browser.

    This applies to 7.3. It probably also applies to 8 and 9, but YMMV.

    1. Re:Installing bittorrent on Redhat by bperkins · · Score: 1

      Did I just get modded down for using the word fuck?

  42. Interseting by YllabianBitPipe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Beyond the sci-fi and action elements of the Matrix it's neat how they are working more of the religios and philisophical elements into the canon ... quite a bit of it going on in this short ... the Boddhavista sitting on the lotus, the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. That being said, I was expecting this episode to be a bit more cynical (if that can be imagined, it's pretty dark already) ... I always thought it would be a mind bender to learn that the humans voluntarily hooked themselves up to the Matrix because living that way would be preferrable to the burned out wasteland they created through war.

  43. Use the main link by Vilim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I started getting it off bittorent then cancelled cause I was only getting like 30k, now I am getting 120k off the main link. The main link stood through the last slashdotting when the last animatrix movie came out, I don't think they will go down this time

    --
    History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
  44. Re:Mod Parent UP by nempo · · Score: 1

    You do know that these shorts come from a commercial DVD ie. posting them on the internet is illegal. Only four of the shorts were released freelly on the net, so to get the other five or so you have to buy the DVD.

    --
    --- No, english is not my mother tongue.
  45. Same filename as SR#1 by Dasigner · · Score: 1

    Please note that this is the same filename as the mov for Second Renaissance - Part 1, so be careful when copying or moving to your Animatrix archive. I'm wget'ing the zipped version.

    I use QuickPlayer 6.1 on Wine to watch the Animatrix movies... MPlayer and Xine play the sound ahead by a few seconds. I tried fiddling with the audio delay, but no go. What do you guys use (on Linux)?

    1. Re:Same filename as SR#1 by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      What version of Wine are you using? I can't Quicktime to work with CVS or WineX

    2. Re:Same filename as SR#1 by GNUman · · Score: 1

      The new one, with Mplayer 0.90_rc5 doesn't show (or at least I didn't notice!!) any delay on the audio.

      With 2 and 3 I needed to use:

      mplayer -delay -10.9 program0xA3B1____640_dl.mov
      mplayer -delay -10.9 detect_640_dl.mov

    3. Re:Same filename as SR#1 by Dasigner · · Score: 1

      I use an old version of Codeweavers Wine (codeweavers-wine-20020904-7, while it was still available) on RH9. To get it running, I added " export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1" to the wine shell script.

      For the QT installation, I had to run in Desktop mode ("Desktop" = "Y" "Managed"="N" in config), otherwise the blue setup screen takes up the whole real desktop and seems to hang. I clicked through the QuickTime installation until it gave an unhandled exception during the "updating registry" step. I almost gave up, but gave it a try. What do you know, it worked... You can use managed/non-desktop mode after it's installed.

      Good luck...

    4. Re:Same filename as SR#1 by Dasigner · · Score: 1

      Will test it out later, still have 41 mins to go for the download (only 256kbps DSL).

      I have MPlayer 0.90 release. BTW, in SR#1, did the robot seem to screech as it was being squashed by the tank? If so, the sound's off. That should only happen in the gang-BANG! scene ;) ... I thought SR#1's sound was ok in MPlayer until I tried it in QT6.

    5. Re:Same filename as SR#1 by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I tried playing this last release with Xine, and it worked perfectly, even the audio synched up.

  46. Or on gentoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    emerge /usr/portage/net-p2p/bittorrent/bittorrent-3.2.1.e build.

    Every day, more people see the light that is gentoo!

    1. Re:Or on gentoo by bperkins · · Score: 1

      Right.

      I've seen enough of gentoo. There may be some light, but there's a great deal of crack smoke as well.

  47. Taking things seriously by xihr · · Score: 1

    I hope we're not taking the premise of The Matrix too seriously. After all, in the description of the state of the real world Morpheus gives, we're told that the AIs are using humans for energy "with a form of fusion." Psst, if you fusion of any kind, you sure don't need humans to generate energy, since they'll poop out more energy than they provide!

    The Matrix is great fun, but taking it as a serious piece of science fiction, and providing further rationalization of the backstory, is like taking cartoons featuring Yosemite Sam as serious Westerns. It's entertaining, but not in that way.

    1. Re:Taking things seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking about this is incredibly stupid, but I shouldn't criticize too loudly because I'm right here with you.

      The amount of energy you can get out of a fusion reaction is very much a point of debate. See, because it would take a horrendous amount of energy just to contain the reaction to keep from turning your power plant into ground zero. Current fusion plants (and there are a couple, you know) have NEGATIVE efficiency; they require more energy to operate than they actually produce. Which is why they're still experimental.

      Human beings, on the other hand, require nothing but food, and the food can be manufactured from human waste.

      So think of the fusion as a sort of bootstrap technology, providing just enough energy (with an efficiency of say a fraction of 1%) to get things started. Put a couple of billion humans in vats and tap their bioelectricity and their thermal waste and you've got yourself a wholly plausible theory.

    2. Re:Taking things seriously by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      "Human beings, on the other hand, require nothing but food, and the food can be manufactured from human waste."

      Yeah, but not at 100% efficiency, or anywhere close. Each generation of waste, you lose energy. You can't sustain yourself on the energy content of your own waste, and adding billions more people won't improve anything.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    3. Re:Taking things seriously by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 1

      Too bad you are all already in the Matrix.

      Also too bad we changed the physics model enough to make you think it was thermodynamically impossible to harvest humans for their energy potential.

      Do you think we care if we turn on your human Basal Metabolic Rate to its maximum?

    4. Re:Taking things seriously by xihr · · Score: 1

      If the AIs have a commercial form of nuclear fusion, they don't need humans for energy. Period.

      Besides, as I said, the premise that the humans are being used as a source of energy indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the laws of thermodynamics. The energy you get out of a human -- regardless of what you do to him -- is going to be less than the energy you put into him via feeding him and keeping him alive. The concept of keeping a vast array of humans alive for the purposes of energy is utterly ludicrous.

      It would have been far more plausible (and, probably, far more effective, since it would add to the creepiness value) if they kept everything the same but the surviving humans really had no idea why the AIs were doing what they were doing -- they're not telling, the humans don't know, and their motives may be so utterly alien that we may never understand.

      The rationalization they give is so weak that a high school physics student could easily poke holes in it.

  48. Matrix Article in Time by tbmaddux · · Score: 3, Informative
    Also, out today (or maybe yesterday?) is a multi-page article in the print magazine, and a flash-laden online version at Time.com about The Matrix: Reloaded.

    Watch out for spoilers -- there's a multi-page section discussing the plot which is well-marked with warnings.

    --
    Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  49. Corrupted file? by webslacker · · Score: 2, Informative

    It appears as though the 480 wide movie and the zip file from the official website are both corrupted.

    1. Re:Corrupted file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, none of us have even seen it yet. ::rolleyes::

  50. This is what I don't get by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered this, so I'll ask here.

    Neo's powers only work within the Matrix right? And they have had the Matrix crash before right? (They mention it in the first when Smith was interrogating Morpheus- and at the end when the green code stops) So why not just debug whatever it is that gives Neo his power in the Matrix and recompile?
    Or just do away with the whole program. They didn't always have a programming running, they could just force people at this point...kind of like a UPS system, not as good, but works!

    Et voila, they win, no?

    1. Re:This is what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why not just debug whatever it is that gives Neo his power in the Matrix and recompile?

      What do you think "reloaded" means?

    2. Re:This is what I don't get by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      In a Hockey game, what is there to prevent any player who realizes that they can just pick up the puck and carry it to the goal, from doing so?

      Why, the referees.

      In the Matrix, what is there to prevent any human from realizing that they can do whatever they can believe themselves doing?

      Why, the Agents.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  51. Well.. you know, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the dvdrip is already out..

    NFO #1
    NFO #2
    NFO #3

    Time to watch Final flight of the Osiris again, I think..
    -r

  52. Re: Such pessimism by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    SF should not be taken literally, after all it's F for fiction. However, The Matrix has many interesting philosophical points and it's a lot more than just technofetishist action. It makes you think about things from different angles than what we're used to in our boring, 9 to 5 working lives. (and that's for the fortunate ones who have a job. *sigh*)

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  53. The stupid power-source thing by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They're _still_ sticking with the claim that the machines are using people as a source of energy!

    That makes abolutly _no_ sense. Entropy makes it very unlikely that getting energy from people would be more efficient than converting the stuff they're using to feed the people directly into energy, especially given the "along with a kind of fusion" remark in the first movie. Even if that weren't true, _cows_ would be a much better source of energy, they're 100% herbivores and thus more efficient, and the machines wouldn't need to bother with the matrix at all for cows.

    The only reasonable explanation is that Morpheus doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. He assumes the people are being used as a power source because he's not up on his basic physics, in actuality the people are being used as processors for tasks that the human brain is well suited for but the machine style AI can't handle efficiently.

    Unfortunatly with the Second Renaisance Part 2, we need to expand the circle of people who have no clue what they're talking about and include the archivist, or whatever the narator is, in the group.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:The stupid power-source thing by dduardo · · Score: 1

      There is a simple answer to this question - it is easier to end the movie period

      If Neo can destroy the matrix then the robots don't have any power, therefore the robots die. And thats how Matrix Revolutions ends.

      Sorry for the spoiler if it wasn't already obvious

    2. Re:The stupid power-source thing by DuckWing · · Score: 1

      Speaking of not knowing what you're talking about, you just said a mouthful. You forget, that in the Matrix,they explained that the Humans "scortched the sky" to stop the machines from using Solar power. In an effort to continue to enslave human kind, the machines came up with the idea of using humans as a battery. They can't use anything else, because they want to keep humans at bay and also, there are no cows in this world, they DIED OFF!

      Now that said, your point about using human brain power to compensate in some way for what the AI can't do makes sense. It might be that the machines are using human brain power to DRIVE/CREATE the matrix in it's entirety!

      --
      -- DuckWing
    3. Re:The stupid power-source thing by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this is a voluntary absurdity; the first thing I though when I noticed it is the 'calories to agricultural resource' ratio of beef... for the same amount of estate and water vegetable carbohydrates and proteins are much cheaper to produce. In the real world we're kind of doing the same thing as Matrix's machines.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    4. Re:The stupid power-source thing by davie · · Score: 1
      That makes abolutly _no_ sense. Entropy makes it very unlikely that getting energy from people would be more efficient than converting the stuff they're using to feed the people directly into energy...

      The "stuff" they're using to feed the people is, well, the people. This causes me to wonder: do people in the Matrix get a strange feeling when they're watching Soylent Green and the hero shouts "Soylent green is people!"?

      --
      slashdot broke my sig
    5. Re:The stupid power-source thing by goofrider · · Score: 1

      There are, by my imagination, a couple spins on the power-source thing.

      1. As terrorism: Human may be an incredibly inefficient power source, but using human this way can promote terror among the remaining rebels. Suicide bombers aren't very efficient compared to missiles, yet they promote much higher level of terror.

      2. Body parts: I'm dying to find out that there are actually a new race of cyborgs (half-machine half human) behind the machines' leadership, and they kept human in captivity to grow body parts for their own longetivity.

      I know its cliche, but so is the moive. :)

      It's still the best sci-fi movie in years though.

    6. Re:The stupid power-source thing by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Speaking of not knowing what you're talking about, you just said a mouthful.

      You said it not i. Oh wait, you _thought_ you were talking about me.

      There's this thing called the Second Law of Thermodynamics. You can't get more out of a system than you put in. You can't even get as much out again, some is always wasted as heat. People have been trying to figure out a way around that law for centuries, and if you think you've found a way, it's 99.999999% certain that you're just not accounting for all the steps.

      Yeah, the humans scorched the sky, so what? It doesn't matter that there's no sun in this equation. HUMANS DO NOT PRODUCE ENERGY! We do not even _store_ energy very well!

      Sure they grind up the humans to feed other humans, but that is not a self-sustaining cycle! You need some kind of energy input. In the natural world all energy comes from one of two sources, fusion power via the sun, or gravitational compression power via the earth's core. The sun is mostly gone, at least in terms of direct sunlight, although the earth is getting at least some heat through the cloud layer or it would freeze over (it's probably got a much higher greenhouse effect, but the green house effect can't be 100% efficient, so there has to be some input)

      So the machine's only natural sources are geothermal power, and fossil fuels and anything else that has sun power stored up. They also have the options of fission and fusion, the later being mentioned in the movie.

      They could use those sources of energy to produce more nutrients to keep the humans' "ecosystem" going. However as has been pointed out elsewhere in the thread, growing food to feed to animals is horribly energy inefficient. The machines could use this energy source directly and get far more out of it than they would eventually be able to extract from the humans that absorbed the nutrients that the machines could grow with the energy.

      As for the cows, like i said, even if they went with this INSANE idea of using high level living beings to produce energy, any mammal would do. Sure, the cows are most likely all dead now (except perhaps in Zion, and you're assuming the machiens don't have advanced cloning capabilities) however at the time the machines made this decision there were cows alive!

      When fighting the war, why didn't any of the machines say, instead of capturing all these humans, why not just KILL all the humans and round up some of the starving cattle and use them instead? Even if all the cows were dead, they could use dogs, or jackals, or rats, or anything else that could survive off of all the dead animals and humans lying around, which there would have been quite a lot of during the war. Humans were not the only option, and were a really stupid choice unless power is not what the machines are really getting out of them.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    7. Re:The stupid power-source thing by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      It doesn't have to be power, the machines could just as easily need the computational power to keep certain aspects of their society running, and Neo shutting down the Matrix would have the same effects.

      However, "all the power got turned off and everyone died," is a lot easier for the average stupid american to understand than "the human computing power got turned off which lead to failure of critical system that depended on quantum computing to function." The loss of power is probably more exciting in film too, lots of things blowing up and such (why do things always blow up in movies if they lose power?)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    8. Re:The stupid power-source thing by wheany · · Score: 1

      They're _still_ sticking with the claim that the machines are using people as a source of energy!

      It's him.
      Do we proceed?
      Yes. he is still...
      ...only a movie.

      You say that like the Wachowski brothers are the Iraqi information minister.

    9. Re:The stupid power-source thing by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Yes, speaking of not knowing what you're talking about, you just said a mouthful or three.

      They can't use anything else, because they want to keep humans at bay And how is the situation where rebels can awaken people from the matrix better than the machine simply wiping them out, all of them? If it's "bioenergy" (snigger) that the machines are after then any animal will do. Cows or overgrown tissue cultures don't rebel.

      there are no cows in this world, they DIED OFF! Says who? I don't recall that being cannon in either the Matrix movie or any of the shorts. Look, the fact is that for every 1 unit of thermal energy that you get from a human body, you'd have to feed it food with a thermal energy value of something like 10 to 100 units. You'd do better just burning your oatmeal in something like a present-day coal-buring power station.

      And if the sky is scorched and the cows all dead, what are they feeding the humans? "other humans" would maybe fulfill 1% of the food needs.

      The only reasonable explanation within the Matrix universe is that Morpheus doesn't know what he's talking about and the machines need human brains for some kind of processing. Other explanations are
      1) It's a daft action movie with a plot hole the size of Texas. (Myself, I'll go with this one).
      2) It's like a metaphor for the lives of downtrodden workers beeing leeched by the capitalist system. Fight the power!

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    10. Re:The stupid power-source thing by wuice · · Score: 1

      They're no more sticking to the claim you describe than George Lucas was sticking to a claim that you can travel in hyperspace and mentally lift spaceships and fight with laser swords. It's a premise for a sci-fi action movie heavily influenced by anime. It doesn't have to make sense to win my approval. In a world where you can become a kung fu master in a few minutes, I'm willing to overlook a few basic laws of physics for the sake of the story.

  54. Battery. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I look at it this way. Morpheous says the humans are baterries. Basically they are feeding the humans energy, but not getting it all back right away. Battery.

    Meh.

  55. Re:A Third Party Animatrix Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, WTF IS THAT? a chick with diahrea shitting on her own face? it that REAL? OMG!

  56. Good reason! by $$$exy+Gwen+Araujo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    BitTorrent is a file sharing network. It needs as many nodes as possible, to make the network better. If Taco publishes bittorrent addresses of stuff that slashdotters really want, they might start running bittorrent to get it, which means that they open up their drive space and bandwidth for the common bittorrent good.

    If I ran a website with over 700,000 daily technically-minded readers, I'd happily take cash from the bittorrent guys twho want to beef up their network with my drone army.

    --

    I'm a girl too! See naked chicks in my journal!
    1. Re:Good reason! by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, that's totally wrong. BitTorrent is a file distribution tool, not a file sharing network. Every posted BitTorrent link is totally independent, and forms its own independent network which does not benefit any other BitTorrent users. So slashdot posting a BitTorrent link of the animatrix doesn't help anyone download Red Hat ISOs. And BitTorrent certainly doesn't give any cash to Slashdot. Have you even seen the BitTorrent website?

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    2. Re:Good reason! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      BitTorrent is going the right way, having p2p as another internet service. Take away the search functionality and you are mostly safe from the likes of RIAA. Of course, you will have websites with databases of files that can be accessed. ;-)

      However, last time I tried it, it didn't seem to do multi-point transfers, meaning that you are likely getting the upstream of an async DSL link. Can't contend with the 320KB/sec I'm currently getting direct from the source. They'll need to sort that out before anyone other than Slashdot geeks take it seriously.

    3. Re:Good reason! by wuice · · Score: 1

      That's funny, bittorrent is the only thing I can use that gives me 320 k/sec anymore.

  57. Re:A Third Party Animatrix Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > fucktard

    Is that somthing like a Woman's Period blood mixed with mustard? Can I just have some Grey Poupon?

  58. Edonkey hast the whole DVD too... by Knight_Walker · · Score: 1

    For those of you who love the donkey as much as I do, here are the links to the share-reactor's Animatrix-DVD releases:

    Get the wohle DVD here (Xvid) or here (SVCD)!

    And for not letting the weak Sharereactor-Servers get /.ed, here is the direct link to the Xvid-File:

    Animatrix_(2003).DVL.ShareReactor.avi
    But for some strange reason, you have to apply a fix mentioned on the SR-page, after your download has been finished.

    I love to see "The final flight of the Osiris" again without having to pay for Dreamcatcher ... :)

  59. Re:A Third Party Animatrix Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know you liked it... And please notice that her vaginal hair is censored, of all things! In Japan, you aren't allowed to show vaginal hair, but you can show the anus. Yucka Yucka!

  60. Warning: These are wrong too. by PseudoThink · · Score: 1

    Weird...even though I grabbed them straight from the source for the pages for the second part, they point to the first part. Whatever...use the other links people posted.

  61. Matrix Reloaded plot synopsis thread... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. More logical to only use Tar format then others. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We *should* be seing more people release any series of videos complete within the Tape_Archive (tar) format. It is an easy way of keeping things together in 1 file and if wanted the user can simply compres that one file (tar). This makes any codec somewhat strange to have built-in compression as compression algorithms (such as zip, bzip, lzip, gzip, etc) change often. Now we have flac, s3tc, and various other algorithms specialized for video and audio data built-in to the codec. Perhaps they should start distributing video and audio data seperatly, for advantages of any compression algorithm to be applied to any data set inter-changably.

    C'mon moderators, please redeam SlashdotTroll with some Positive Karma; I ned to be fed. :)

  63. your sig by Deitheres · · Score: 0

    Funny you mention that. I used to work at a Red Roof Inn in Columbus, OH, and godhead stayed there. I ended up jamming with the lead guitar player. He plays some mean blues but, as a band, you are right they do suck. I actually asked him why he was playing in this shitty band, and he said it was only for the money.

    --
    Just like driving a car:
    (D) to go forward
    (R) to go backward

  64. mplayer whining by ArmorFiend · · Score: 3, Informative

    As usual, no way to watch this in Linux.
    Take for expample MPlayer's complaint:

    Opening video decoder: [qtvideo] Quicktime Video decoder
    Win32 LoadLibrary failed to load: qtmlClient.dll, /usr/lib/win32/qtmlClient.dll, /usr/local/lib/win32/qtmlClient.dll
    invalid qt DLL!
    VDecoder init failed :(
    *** Try to upgrade /roam/dm/.mplayer/codecs.conf from etc/codecs.conf
    *** If it still does not work, read DOCS/codecs.html!


    DOCS/codecs.html said, a bunch of confusing stuff, mainly "go to our website and get more confused". Why can't video people ever write stuff in english?

    1. Re:mplayer whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am watching it with Xine on Gentoo with no problems.

    2. Re:mplayer whining by sanermind · · Score: 1

      I watched it in mplayer with no dificulties whatsoever. Did you bother to install the QT codecs? Duh.

      --

      ---
      the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
    3. Re:mplayer whining by GldisAter · · Score: 1

      mplayer works fine. Update your version and the dependant libraries.

  65. Help for those in Bit Torrent limbo... by blitzoid · · Score: 1

    "Hi, my name is Foobar, and I can't seem to get Bit Torrent working under linux!"

    I had the same problem, so what I do is just run the python scripts directly to make them download the .torrent.

    Run this in your Bit Torrent dir:

    btdownloadheadless.py --display_interval 5 --url http://www.url.org/file.torrent

    Not the best solution out there, but one that works for me.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
  66. How do you view the movie fullscreen in Quicktime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    I'm on a Windows machine running Quicktime 6.2. How do I view the movie fullscreen?

    The full screen option seems to be disabled. Why?

    AC

  67. Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics by toejam · · Score: 1

    Since the first movie, I hoped they were going to explain the machines keeping the humans around and using them as a form energy with a twist on Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics.

    If the machines were bound by laws similar to the three laws of robotics, which forces them to keep the human race alive, the Matrix offers a good way to control humans and maintain those laws.

    The powerplant can be seen from an efficiancy standpoint. The humans are consuming energy in their use of the Matrix, why not try to reclaim some of that energy to run the system?

    The machines then run primarally from other energy sources, such as geothermal, tidal, and wind.

    1. Re:Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My own pet theory was that the machines' AI was parasitic in nature--they required human hosts to become fully self-aware. It'd at least tie up the need for agents to lock onto other people when manifesting.

      Unfortunately, The Second Rennaisance was written by the Wachowskis, which IMO is as canon as it gets. So human batteries it is. With a backstory that looks like the Russian Revolution at the Epcot Center.

  68. They had so much potential by btempleton · · Score: 1

    Many have complained about the perpetuation of the battery story. For me, it's a real serious blow to see it confirmed.

    I always wondered to myself, "how could people who could write such a cool movie put in something as stupid as the battery story? If so, how did it get past everybody who saw the script or rushes?"

    It made no sense. Small as it may seem, it takes the movie down several notches in my book, and the book of anybody with an education.

    So I started thinking to myself -- maybe they aren't so stupid. Maybe Morpheus is LYING. Maybe Morpheus has been lied to, and we'll get a cool story of the reason behind the lie.

    But no, if these animated shorts are canon, neither of these are true. Sure, movies have bad science all the time but the best movies in part make their mark either by not having the bad science, or by there being an obvious dramatic reason for the bad science. Sure, spaceships don't whoosh, but we accept it because it's fun and more dramatic in a space opera. Sure, you can't go FTL but you can't have interstellar SF that's dramatic without it.

    But this battery thing has no excuse. It's as interchangeable with any other reason you might come up with for the humans to be kept alive. It doesn't affect the plot, all we need to care is that they are being kept alive and there is some reason.

    Like the Hyperion reason, or a core bit of Asimovian twisted-first-law programming forcing them to keep the Humans alive and happy, with the Matrix being the makes-sense-only-to-the-AIs result. That would make more sense, and in fact be far more tragic than the battery story.

    Grrrrrr.

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    1. Re:They had so much potential by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stories are being told by the Zion Librarian Computer. They aren't being told by an omniscient, objective outsider. Given that, there's no reason to believe that any lie Morpheus was told isn't here as well. Hell, this is the most likely place he'd have learned it.

  69. Efect? by sparkhead · · Score: 1

    Do they not have spellcheckers in the Matrix universe?

  70. detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    so how old is the "new" matrix? like the one that Neo woke up from?

    in "detective story" we can see that the matrix is some quasi-futuristic environment, and trinity is a part of it. does that mean that she lived through the upload of the new, contemporary matrix?

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by m1chael · · Score: 1

      based in the matrix realm doesnt mean they are part of some serial story.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
    2. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      so the different "subnets" can possibly run different realms?

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by m1chael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NO. im not talking about the matrix matrix, im talking about THE MATRIX.

      animatrix is BASED on the matrix universe so to speak, it doesnt have to follow a story.

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
    4. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by GS11_Pus · · Score: 1

      Agent Smith says in the first movie that "whole batches were lost" when they had the "perfect" society type Matrix.

    5. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I acutally believe he said whole 'crops' were lost. Someone may want to double check me.

    6. Re:detective story and trinity...the first matrix? by GS11_Pus · · Score: 1

      Bah. Ya got me.

  71. Ask Slashdot: "What else is this good?" by glowurm · · Score: 1
    From the "I-Want-More-Now" department...
    Glowurm writes: "I am not new to Anime, but am not a completely junkie fan either. I have my favorites, and enjoy a few here and there while recognizing the contribution of certain films to the genre. For instance, while I understand the value of Akira, it seemed primitive to me, as the artwork was oddly stylized and rough."

    "I've enjoyed 'Urotsokidoji,' 'Lain,' and a number of other series, but have found few that rival the epic, apocalyptic feeling of 'The Animatrix' which is also felt in films such as 'Terminator 2.' What else, in anime, fills these shoes?"

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot: "What else is this good?" by Castolari · · Score: 1

      I would look at Metropolis for a not quite apocalyptyic but interesting look at the "Man vs. Machine" story- Its a plotline anime is quite fond of, and the viuals in Metropolis are astounding.

      Specifically looking for an apocalyptic feel... Many anime deal with either a tragic disaster somewhere along the lines, planet/galaxy ruining(Macross) or not(Cowboy Bebop). Another theme is humanity colonizing another planet, or trying to, and creating an equally devastated frontier state from that(Trigun, Saber Marionette J). Trigun is what I cosider an excellent gateway anime- While it starts rather lighthearted, and lags at points in the middle when you're tired of one-shots, the drama by the end is excellent, so I'd look into that.

    2. Re:Ask Slashdot: "What else is this good?" by glowurm · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to say thanks for the tips - I'll do some watching. I've seen "Metropolis" and loved it - beautiful film.

      BTW - tried to find some way of leaving a message to you personally, through your user link, and found none. I'm not sure if anything like it exists here on /. but many of the PBB systems have private messaging and such. I'm a long time reader but a minimal participator (other than meta- and normal moderation) so I don't have all the little specifics figured out yet on that sort of thing...

      Thx again!

  72. What do they want? by Seldon_21 · · Score: 1

    What are the machines doing with all of the power? Where is the explaination for that? Why haven't they cleaned up the world? If we instilled in them our spirit why don't they move out into space? Where are they getting all of the raw materials to make these vastly hugh creatures? How's that for some questions?

    1. Re:What do they want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya no doubt.The same could be asked about OMNIUS and its empire in Dune: The Butlerian Jihad.

  73. Some Thoughts on the soft-sci-fi "power thing" by neibwe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading a particular article in the Matrix philosophy section, I've gotten a little less annoyed with the bio-electric power, because they put more emphasis on telling a story and seeding discussion. --although I still occasionally get knee-jerk desires to yell out, "OMG that's so BS," at the "bioelectric" energy plot-hole/saver(?). One possiblity: The machines, following the "essence of the second renaissance", chose to "bless all forms of intelligence" and preserve humanity for ethical[?] reasons and subsequently did something useful with the human "flesh" the machines had demanded from the people at the United Nations HQ(?) --sounds like a Computer Lifeform's Burden argued for by the human rights faction of the artificial intelligence collective =D[1]

    Maybe he film producers are well aware that people don't generate power, but they're trying to show that people are always getting used for power today (politically) and in the future (elecrically [electronically]?) Human-brains-as-computing-source plot device wasn't used, emphasizing that the machines could do all the processing "needed", relegating humans to --exceedingly-- menial power generating duties, a form of role reversal showing how far man had fallen from their earlier thought-of-as superior position.

    After all, having "long studied man's, simple, protein based based" bodies, the machines could have engineered blocks of cancer-like bioelectric flesh superior in most ways to the human-power-cells for their power duties because the blocks reproduce, come in adjustable shapes, and are very very unlikely to rebel [al la Neo] ;) ) But, they'd be boring, they'd kill the "save the enslaved masses" plot, and wouldn't be as ironic *heh*


    _____________
    [1]All quotes occur near the section where a machine intelligence is meeting with human leaders in Second Renaissance Part 2 before the building blows up like Neo Tokyo in Akira

  74. Correct. by gnarled · · Score: 1

    If you watch the trailer for the entire series only the second renaissance one explain any history. The other seven are all just unrelated stories in the matrix world. However buying the dvd would be worth it so you don't have to pay money to see the Animatrices that come before shitty movies like Dreamcatcher. All the ones that will be released on the internet have been, the other five will be shorts before movies, as was Flight of the Osiris, which was the CG one before Dreamcatcher.

    --
    I'm a firm believer in the philosophy of a ruling class. Especially since I rule. -Randal, Clerks
  75. 152,046,876 bytes of bandwidth wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...because of you!

    I wonder why the file has a different size than the one I had, and why it has a timestamp of May 1 09:59 instead of Feb 4 18:00.

    Oh well, I wish they would call the files animatrix1.mov animatrix2.mov animatrix3.mov animatrix4.mov instead of some "final_dl" bullshit.

  76. Inconsitent with the Movie by Auron · · Score: 1

    Is it just my bad memory or in the movie doesn't morpheus say something along the lines of "we don't know who started the war...." to neo when he is explaining the matrix. However in the second renaissance it implies humans started the war and if it's taken from a Zion archive why didn't morpheus know about it? and why doesn't this animatrix explain the prefect matrix that humans didn't accept?

    1. Re:Inconsitent with the Movie by Seldon_21 · · Score: 2

      First it is clear that there is a lot of infomation that is left out because it muddles the story. This series does give us some clues to the back story of the matrix while continuing the serial thriller feel so that we will buy the DVD. Again I think that they are telling a great metaphysical story and that the ideas the directors/writters are producing are helping to bring philosphy back to in line with the ideas of science. Why is it always so dark?

  77. It's just come to me that... [Spoiler] by Xophmeister · · Score: 1

    ...in the latest episode, "Second Renaissance II", we plucky humans drop nuclear weapons on "Zero One"; however, the machines survive as they aren't prone to the effects of radiation.

    Be that as it may, but nukes tend to throw out a lot of heat; but even still, this is not my point... AFAIK they also emit a massive EMP discharge, which

    Trinity: ...our only weapon against them.

    I sure hope someone was fired for that one ;)

    --

    Christopher Harrison

    1. Re:It's just come to me that... [Spoiler] by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      Actually no, we have small atmospheric nukes which generate an EMP and are currently used as a way to throw off enemy equipment.

  78. "three laws" related by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    It might be that the robots have some sort of artifact in their programming they can't get rid of, that keeps them from committing genocide. They can't let the humans starve, but the energy cost to feed them is too much to keep their own civilization running as well... Unless they recapture as much of that energy as possible...

  79. I have a couple questions too by reverseengineer · · Score: 1
    In the first movie (the feature film, not the Animatrix), the crew of the Neb claims that the only effective weapon the humans possess against the machines is an electromagnetic pulse. Now, at the start of this short, the human race uses what certainly appear to be a large number of nuclear weapons to attack the machine nation of 01. According to the short, the robots survive this assault, as they are made of metal, and robots are strong. But shouldn't those nukes have an attendant EMP, making the 'bots far more vulnerable?

    Assuming there's an answer to that, I didn't really anticipate the machines capturing full-grown human beings and placing them in the Matrix. This may be more of just a mistaken assumption on my part, but I always figured that the machines wouldn't even bother trying to insert humans used to the real world into the Matrix- that they would readily reject the simulation. If someone like Neo, who had been born inside the Matrix and had no idea of what the actual state of the world was until he woke up in a vat of pink goo, could exist in the Matrix (prior to being set free) and feel that there was something wrong with reality ("splinter in your mind"), then surely at least some adult humans who had lived in the bombed out hell of the real world, who had watched as the machines took over, who writhed and screamed as the machines drilled a dozen holes into their bodies, would perhaps have a difficult time accepting the sunny new version of "reality" that confronted them. Especially since, according to the film, Matrix ver. 1.0 wasn't terribly believable anyway.

    I guess I just figured that if the robots have that swank artifical womb technology, they could just extract gametes from captured humans and use those to produce embryos, which at the appropriate size are hooked up to the powerplant. Given that a few captured humans could each provide enough gametes to potentially produce thousands of offspring, it would be possible to breed numerous large crops from a relatively small pool of humans, with plenty of sperm and ova tucked away in cold storage just in case of crop failure (which of course happened, according to the film). Attempting to place adult humans in the Matrix as the first generation would not only be difficult, it would be totally unnecessary. A better use for the humans that were captured (once an appropriate amount of genetic material was gathered) would be simply to liquefy them and feed them to their progeny. Admittedly, the idea of forcing captured humans into the Matrix does have the whole humiliation and subjugation thing working for it.

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    1. Re:I have a couple questions too by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      In the first movie (the feature film, not the Animatrix), the crew of the Neb claims that the only effective weapon the humans possess against the machines is an electromagnetic pulse. Now, at the start of this short, the human race uses what certainly appear to be a large number of nuclear weapons to attack the machine nation of 01. According to the short, the robots survive this assault, as they are made of metal, and robots are strong. [robotcombat.com] But shouldn't those nukes have an attendant EMP, making the 'bots far more vulnerable?

      Wow, you're right, i never thought of that. If that was the Second Renaisance, maybe they're in a (relative) Dark Age now, and have forgotten how to harden themselves against EMPs? :)

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:I have a couple questions too by entrager · · Score: 1

      then surely at least some adult humans who had lived in the bombed out hell of the real world, who had watched as the machines took over, who writhed and screamed as the machines drilled a dozen holes into their bodies, would perhaps have a difficult time accepting the sunny new version of "reality" that confronted them

      Ah yes, but if you recall, when negotiating his reinsertion into the Matrix, Sypher requested that he not remember anything. Sounds to me like the machine can "reprogram" a humans memory before inserting them into the Matrix.

    3. Re:I have a couple questions too by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Maybe they dropped the EMP shielding as a needless waste of resources after the Humans were trounced. Maybe their little scout robos don't have it, but their full-bore combat machines do.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  80. Here's how I would answer that by esanbock · · Score: 1

    There's no sun light no more. Robots ain't so good with making food into energy. Humans seem to do that just fine. Robots are putting the human's intestines and junk to work converting foot->heat->electricity

    Not so much a battery as a generator running on non-renewable energy.

  81. Missing a Big Point by Ken@WearableTech · · Score: 1

    I don't think that this is as good as the first. The biggest flaw is saying the robots where not effected by heat or radiation from our nukes. Well BFD! The EM pulse from all those nukes would have a large effect, but that is not even mentioned. I mean they made a whoe James Bond movie about it people!

  82. Re:How do you view the movie fullscreen in Quickti by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    I think they want you to buy the Pro version.

  83. K, one thing needs to be said right now by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    To all the people bitching about the science behind humans being stored as batteries etc......well, I just have one thing to say to you, this isn't Star Trek. They don't have tons of technical journals that go over the schematics for a holodeck, this is the Matrix, it's supposed to be enjoyed with a willing suspense of disbelief. And if you needed any more proof that the Matrix isn't supposed to be very technical.....well, Keanu Reeves is the star, there's your proof.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:K, one thing needs to be said right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point about the scientific aspects of this kind of movie is that it wouldn't be so expensive to just consult a engineer or (even cheaper) an undergraduate student before writing the script. Just think about the movies where a system administrator finds out that somebody hacked into one of their computers. They are generally depicted as panicking, unable to stop the attack by any means. It looks as if nobody ever told movie producers that when you unplug the network cable, your computer is automatically disconnected from the Internet, thus stopping the attack.
      Another example is Andromeda Ascendant : in almost every episode, we're reminded that this ship is the most powerful in the known universe. Commonwealth Fall or not, we have to believe that during 300 years, no military progress was achieved by millions of inhabited world. It's nonsense. Can you imagine Spain or Portugal still using the same type of vessels that were commissioned in 1703 ? Although those two countries (once mighty empires) have fallen, they have modern weaponry.
      Like someone else said it before me, if movies misuse scientific knowledge that is available to a 7th grader, there is something wrong because we're not even talking about science fiction here.

  84. not that big a point by rebelcool · · Score: 1

    All military hardware today is shielded against EMP. I would think sentient robots 200 years from now would also be aware of their own weaknesses and be shielded as well.

    --

    -

    1. Re:not that big a point by Qender · · Score: 1

      Unless you remember that in the film, they used EMP to defend against the robots.

  85. Depressing? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else feel really depressed after watching this? Machines taking over earth and all. Heheh...

    1. Re:Depressing? by harborpirate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually still rather sick to my stomach from the first one. The image of the machine cruelly ripping the brain out of a persons skull after the person begged for their life pretty well turned me off from the whole thing.

      Guess I really don't like anime.. I've tried watching a several different anime movies/shows, and each time I've found the violence to exceed what even most R rated movies contain.

      I don't mind the animation style of anime, though I find the sharp edges and harsh, abrasive lines a little irritating. Just to me it feels like the over the top violence seems like some kind of pent up childish nerd/geek angst. I just find it hard to connect with that, I feel like I've matured beyond the need for cruel retribution.

      And yes, end of humanity and/or the world scenarios do tend to be depressing.

      I'm sure the wrath of the anime zealots will burn my karma.. Oh well, screw 'em - I'm a computer geek and I think anime sucks.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
  86. Mod this up!!! by Heretic2 · · Score: 1

    This is the most intelligent perspective I've seen.

  87. Plot hole? by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

    In this episode of the Animatrix, humanity tries to A-bomb the machines into submission. Since we already know that the machines can be disabled with an electromagnetic pulse, why didn't humanity just detonate an A-bomb in the upper atmosphere, a la Goldeneye (an effect based in science, I assure you), and thusly disable the machines without having to resort to blocking out the sun? After all, that would be just as harmful to humanity as it would be to machines.

    --
    This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
  88. That aint a plot hole, its a McGuffin by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >That is a major plot hole for me,

    No, the energy stuff is called a McGuffin. A Mcguffin is anything in a movie that keeps the plot going. For instance a super-secret agent chasing down a beautiful super-model who is also a super secret agent because she's carrying the microfilm. What's on the microfilm? It doesn't matter.

    So the writers needed a reason to keep the Matrix going, or the machines would just kill the humans and be done with it. Other acceptable alternatives would be to examine their strange minds, keep them in a zoo, morally against genocide, etc. Who cares? Energy works just as well.

    A plot hole happens when parts of the movie are so badly edited that an event happens which doesnt fit in with the rest of the linear story. Or more rarely when the story was just bad to begin with.

    > They still don't explain how a human in itself can generate more energy than it costs to maintain that very same human alive and well in the Matrix.

    You forgot to add your Professor Frink noise after the end of that sentence.

  89. Re:How do you view the movie fullscreen in Quickti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try these for Quicktime: (register in control panel or during install)
    Name: Steve Jobs
    Company: Apple
    KRDP-9WG6-N4L9-8UZK-CORE
    or
    Name: Steve Jobs
    Company: Apple
    LDAU-NDCN-6D86-WRLU-5678
    or
    Name: Quicktime User
    Company:Quicktime User
    UDUR-GGCZ-NRAP-UR4D-5678

    QuickTime v6.0 Name: Quicktime User (win):UDUR-GGCZ-NRAP-UR4D-5678 (mac):Z684-9ZDD-U86D-KCGC-B760

  90. Re:mplayer whining you should use XINE + QT6 codec by buddha+boy · · Score: 1

    i dunno about this file as i'm a 56k-er but the previous files all work with Xine and the QT6 codecs available from the mplayer web site, extract them to /usr/lib/win32 and away you go - quite easy really ;-)

  91. This is how The TRANSFORMERS were created by boy_afraid · · Score: 1

    Isn't this how The Transformers were created. Thier creators, the Quintessons created simple robot servants. The servants were then later modifed to become a work force of both soldier and worker. Later, these machines became sentient and demanded rights. These machines then overthrew their creators and were the masters of their down destiny. The Transformers were not greater or more important than thier creators.

    1. Re:This is how The TRANSFORMERS were created by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Transformers were not greater or more important than thier creators.

      NOOOOOOOOO!!!1! THE TRANSFORMARS ARE BETTR THAN EVARYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      TRANSFORMARS ROOL!

    2. Re:This is how The TRANSFORMERS were created by unicron · · Score: 1

      No. The Quintessons were not the first transformers. The first transformers were Primacon and Unicron. Primacon created all the others, including decepticons. Unicron was chaos.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  92. Re:mplayer whining you should use XINE + QT6 codec by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Thank you. Following those instructions got me video, but the audio still doesn't work, and I have to run with either no sound (mplayer -audiofile /dev/null) or crash on the 1st frame. Do you know the magic files to download for the audio portion?

  93. Your argument is based entirely on assumption by Sanity · · Score: 1
    Care to say what you mean by permanent ? It's no more permanent than BitTorrent; if nobody wants the file, it dies off quickly.
    When people stop "sharing" a particular file on BitTorrent, nobody can get to it. On Freenet, the file will persist so long as there is a demand for it. In other words, availability on Freenet tracks the actual demand for a file more closely than BitTorrent.
    "but will automatically begin to share it, if it becomes popular." ... It will also use the bandwidth avaiable in a rather suboptimal way, to insure privacy and security. BitTorrent does not waste bandwidth, at the price of anonymity.
    You assume that Freenet could only achieve anonymity by wasting bandwidth, yet provide little evidence for this. In many ways Freenet's caching algorithm makes more efficient use of bandwidth than many P2P architectures, and unlikely BitTorrent - it requires no centralized coordination for file distribution. Yes Freenet imposes some overhead for anonymity, but the other advantages of its content distribution algorithm more than compensate for this.
    Hmm. I got a download rate of over 1mbyte/s on the torrent for that; and there were a LOT of people getting fast speeds (I have the logs to prove it ;-)
    I believe the 120kb/sec rate was over a cable modem with a maximum downstream of 160kb/sec - I would like to see BitTorrent achieve 1mb/sec in that situation ;-) Generally, I generally see Freenet downloads at about 70% of my maximum downstream capacity, even when I am behind a NAT, and Freenet doesn't take 20 minutes to ramp up to its maximum download speed as i have seen with BitTorrent.
    Yeah, the link only goes down when the generous storage & bandwidth providers on the freenet network don't feel like providing this free service anymore ...
    Oh, so BitTorrent doesn't rely on people's generosity with storage and bandwidth? I must have misunderstood how it worked. One could argue that Freenet's more noble goals will make people more inclined to be generous with their resources than with BitTorrent.
    Don't get me wrong, FreeNet is a nice system ... Its goals are different from BitTorrent though (anonymity vs. efficient use of bandwidth, privacy vs. speed, everything vs. single-uri, etc.), and in this case, BT is probably the better choice.
    You are assuming that just because Freenet has more ambitious goals than BitTorrent, that it couldn't possibly beat BT at its own game while still maintaining anonymity. Given my experience of both systems, I wouldn't be so quick to make such an assumption.

    Perhaps some kind of head-to-head comparison would be interesting.

    1. Re:Your argument is based entirely on assumption by mxs · · Score: 1

      "You assume that Freenet could only achieve anonymity by wasting bandwidth, yet provide little evidence for this. In many ways Freenet's caching algorithm makes more efficient use of bandwidth than many P2P architectures, and unlikely BitTorrent - it requires no centralized coordination for file distribution. Yes Freenet imposes some overhead for anonymity, but the other advantages of its content distribution algorithm more than compensate for this."

      The caching nature of freenet is nice, it gets the content closer to the peers who want it. Though essentially, BitTorrent does the same; peers close to one another (in terms of throughput) benefit from eachother.

      "Oh, so BitTorrent doesn't rely on people's generosity with storage and bandwidth? I must have misunderstood how it worked. One could argue that Freenet's more noble goals will make people more inclined to be generous with their resources than with BitTorrent."

      BT relies on people's generosity in bandwidth, that much is true. Any P2P does. The tiny difference with Freenet is that you don't know what the storage and bandwidth go towards, and have no way of limiting it to, say, a specific group of files. Or to put it differently : many people are much more inclined to share the Red Hat 9 ISOs than any random junk.

      Noble goals are nice. Even though you have complete deniability and decent anonymity on Freenet, not all people are as noble as to allowing ANY kind of content to flow through their lines -- and freenet does have /EVERY/ kind of content, even the most despickable stuff (by my moral standards, anyway).

      "You are assuming that just because Freenet has more ambitious goals than BitTorrent, that it couldn't possibly beat BT at its own game while still maintaining anonymity. Given my experience of both systems, I wouldn't be so quick to make such an assumption."

      Anonymity and optimal bandwidth use are two conflicting goals. Freenet does rather well, but all things being perfect, it will loose to the non-anonymous approach.

      "Perhaps some kind of head-to-head comparison would be interesting."

      It probably would, but to tell the truth, if you complain about my assumptions, it will be useless. You can do point-by-point comparisons of the technology and still have no coherent picture of real world performance; and real world performance is hard to validate or even describe in a decently huge swarm.

  94. Re:mplayer whining you should use XINE + QT6 codec by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

    faad2 is the audio codec, there are debs if your a debian person available.

  95. Brain power by teknotus · · Score: 1

    Most of the reasons for everything in the matrix are obfuscated. It's all part of how the machines control people. It seems to me that the reason that people in the matrix can sometimes alter it is because most of the computational power used to generate the dreamworld is the brainpower of the people trapped in it. Notice how Trinity asks for a program to be loaded into her brain by her operator. Little things like spoons can be passed from one mind to another, but an agent program is so big that it takes a whole human brain. The reverse is also true. Human minds connected to the matrix have some of their thoughts computed outside of their bodies. Thats why they only need the strong network link when they are entering, and leaving. Most of the time they don't need their physical brain all that much, because they can borrow little bits here and there. They do need a home base though to keep track of everything. Sort of like a file allocation table. If you have your conciousness fragmented all over a network you need something to glue it togeather. Additionaly humans aren't hurt by EMP, so humans are a good place to backup code. Of course I could be seeing things the the authors didn't indend in an effort to make sense of it all.