Slashdot Mirror


Canadian Census: 20,000 Jedi Worshippers

Lev13than writes "Canada.com is reporting that some 20,000 Canadians listed "Jedi" as their religion in the last national census (2001). Apparently this is the offshoot of an Internet joke which originated in Australia a few years back. The results are interesting on a couple of levels. While it show that some people may have too much time on their hands, it also raises questions of privacy rights, Internet activism and data integrity. Although it's not statistically significant given Canada's population of 31.5 million, 20,000 lightsabre-wielding census-takers is nothing to sneeze at. StatsCan's full report (with no mention of Jedis) can be found here."

455 comments

  1. In other news.... by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are about 20,000 single guys who enjoy D&D and star wars in Canada!

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
    1. Re:In other news.... by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Though they're not quite as bad as the Klingon speaking mentally ill in Oregon...

    2. Re:In other news.... by Flounder · · Score: 3, Funny
      There are about 20,000 single guys who enjoy D&D and star wars in Canada!

      What about us married guys that enjoy D&D and Star Wars? We still can't get laid, but at least now we've got an excuse. We're married.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    3. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May the good lord bless you all ^.^

    4. Re:In other news.... by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      20,000 is a lot of Jedi, but how many Elvites live in Canada? Maybe they haven't spread beyond the U.S. yet.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    5. Re:In other news.... by Flounder · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was going to put some witty comeback here. But I guess I don't need to. Screwing my wife is punishment enough for you.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    6. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that u ms dixie chick chick?

    7. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It certainly is ... can I stop now?

    8. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this just in from slashdot...

      slashdot now has 20,000 registered users in Canada.

    9. Re:In other news.... by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Getting married will kill your sexlife 9 times out of 10. The one guy is the lucky bastard :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    10. Re:In other news.... by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Not true! Have you not heard the popular saying:
      Get married and get it regular.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    11. Re:In other news.... by rEWDBOi · · Score: 1

      .. And how many Discordians are there in Canada? After all, it seems to be the perfect place to get out of each other's way, as Discordians are advised to. And if you do meet one, you can make all the animal sounds you like, without anybody ever looking at you strangely, because.. well.. it's Canada.

    12. Re:In other news.... by CoolVibe · · Score: 2, Informative
      Get married and get it regular.

      That's merely advertising. Do you believe everything that is advertised?

      But hey, if it does seem to work out for some people, more power to them. But not me. Oh no. I'll stop before I get off topic... mmm... I'm already off topic... drat...

    13. Re:In other news.... by Fjan11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      True. Once a year is regular :-/

      --
      This sig is just as redundant as the rest of this posting
    14. Re:In other news.... by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      "Get married and get it regular."

      You fool! That saying isn't about sex.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    15. Re:In other news.... by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      yeah, getting my wallet cleansed regularly!

    16. Re:In other news.... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      I wonder if this guy (BitTorrent link) is from Canada?

    17. Re:In other news.... by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 1

      Uh, I just checked, and he is. Thanks Waxy!

    18. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said the 20,000 were all guys?

    19. Re:In other news.... by crizh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lucky?

      Exhausted more like. ;)

      --
      Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
    20. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the fact that I'm screwing his wife is just going too far, then?

    21. Re:In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about us married guys that enjoy D&D and Star Wars? We still can't get laid

      Speak for yourself. I'm a Canadian married guy, and I get laid several times a week.

  2. Just Wondering by dirkdidit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's not an organized society for the Jedi religion like there is for other larger religions is there???

    1. Re:Just Wondering by swordboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's not an organized society for the Jedi religion like there is for other larger religions is there???

      I would imagine that some enterprising individuals will take advantage sooner or later. At least here in the United States, a religion gets tax-free benefits. Wouldn't it be cool if someone organized a religion and then created a business underworld to avoid the government ala scientology?

      For example,

      A business could hire a Jedi employee. But instead of paying him/her with US currency, they could be paid in Jedi Dollars - JD (insert creative currency name here). The JD's could then be spent at any participating Jedi establishment - merely tax free. If so inclined, the Jedi could ask the employer to pay in a portion of taxable US dollars or the employee could trade them at market rate.

      The opportunity is endless. When someone does implement it, I sure hope that they aren't as crooked as those fucking scientologists.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:Just Wondering by dirkdidit · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wouldn't it be cool if someone organized a religion and then created a business underworld to avoid the government ala scientology?

      That actually perfectly describes Catholocism(and nearly every other major religion). TV evangelists, religious TV stations, that nun on that one channel selling beads all makes money for the church in the end. But hey I guess they need to make living too.
    3. Re:Just Wondering by scotartt · · Score: 2, Funny
      Wouldn't it be cool if someone organized a religion and then created a business underworld to avoid the government ala scientology?

      SUCH A THING ALREADY EXISTS

      --
      -A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed-
    4. Re:Just Wondering by Narcissus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it does perfectly describe any of the major religions. The people that "organised" these religions did not go on to create "a business underworld to avoid the government".

      Yes, there are "followers" of major religions that use others' beliefs to their advantage, but that was not the intent of those that "developed" the religion, unlike the parent post's comment.

    5. Re:Just Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A business could hire a Jedi employee. But instead of paying him/her with US currency, they could be paid in Jedi Dollars - JD (insert creative currency name here). The JD's could then be spent at any participating Jedi establishment - merely tax free. If so inclined, the Jedi could ask the employer to pay in a portion of taxable US dollars or the employee could trade them at market rate.

      The company I work for at one point was involved with trade dollars. Never made sense to me: Sooner or later, someone gets stuck with them. Soon enough, the company I worked for got stuck with them.

    6. Re:Just Wondering by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Jesus was executed by the Roman's for not paying tribute to the state gods because it was a "false idol". Unfortunately, that was Rome's ony form of taxation. Therefore, Jesus himself was crucified for tax evasion (and even worse, for encouraging it in others).

    7. Re:Just Wondering by Sheriff+Fatman · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's just one fatal flaw with your otherwise excellent proposal, exemplified thus:

      Checkout Guy: That'll be $22.95, please.
      Darth Jeff: We don't have any proper money, but (waves hand) Jedi Dollars will do fine.

      You see the problem? :)

      --
      -- Open Source: It's mad, but you don't have to work here to help.
    8. Re:Just Wondering by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Because Lucas would sue the bejeasus out of them. Or back into them, as it were.

    9. Re:Just Wondering by toriver · · Score: 1

      There was, but the organization was wiped out by the Sith in the aftermath of the Clone Wars. A long time ago, in a galaxy far away.

      Or something.

    10. Re:Just Wondering by libnatel · · Score: 1

      jedi dollars??? "credits" remain constant with the whole star wars universe thing

    11. Re:Just Wondering by L0k11 · · Score: 1

      and how much will that be in pubes?

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    12. Re:Just Wondering by greatone · · Score: 1

      Jesus was executed by the Roman's for not paying tribute to the state gods because it was a "false idol". Unfortunately, that was Rome's ony form of taxation. Therefore, Jesus himself was crucified for tax evasion (and even worse, for encouraging it in others).

      Sorry your wrong. Christ was killed because the Jewish leadership claimed he was saying that he was King of the Jews ("It is you who say that I am.") Christ actually told people to pay thier taxes. "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's. Give to God what is God."

      Yeah I know that I should lookup the passages for proof, but it's lunch here at work and I'm going to go eat.

    13. Re:Just Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't think it does perfectly describe any of the major religions. The people that "organised" these religions did not go on to create "a business underworld to avoid the government".
      No --- back when Catholicism was being created, the Church was more powerful than the government so it was more of a business overworld. Henry VIII spotted that little trick...
    14. Re:Just Wondering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not, Canadian Tire (A hardware store) uses Canadian Tire Dollars

    15. Re:Just Wondering by magarity · · Score: 1

      You don't need a religion to do this. Nothing is stopping you from printing up Swordboy Bucks by the truckload. The trick is getting other people to accept them. Only the federal reserve is authorized to print legal tender. So Swordboy Bucks (or any other private currency) is unlikely to be accepted.

    16. Re:Just Wondering by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      I am familiar with the Give Caesar... passage. In fact that was the whole problem, because by giving unto God what was God's you cut Caesar out as the middleman.

      Actually, I am just regurgitating what my history 125 teacher said in the Roman History class I took like 2 years ago. He made a really good argument for his case and convinced me. I just can't remember all the good points at the moment.

    17. Re:Just Wondering by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, BTW I am not saying tax evasion was the ONLY (IMHO the biggest though) reason Jesus got fragged. That king of the jews stuff probably pissed off quite a few Jews as well, but it was the Romans that did the killing.

  3. They might just as well have put by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Virgin (Y/N)?"

    1. Re:They might just as well have put by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all us virgins are that pathetic. We might be losers, but that is a special kind of loser.

    2. Re:They might just as well have put by MsGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, after all, Jedi have to live a life of celibacy, right?

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:They might just as well have put by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

      That might be true (and funny) for a lot of people but here in Australia many people put down Jedi to protest over there being a religion question at all (then again it might just be the Aussie sense of homour).

      The nations, government owned, youth radio station JJJ actually encouraged people to do this.

    4. Re:They might just as well have put by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they can screw, just not love....

      According to Lucas...

    5. Re:They might just as well have put by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Funny

      That pissed me off so bad. What's the point in being a bad ass Jedi if you can't get your groove on? But in the movie, they say that the objection isn't moral, but that love detracts from the jedi focus and is beneath them. Does that mean that they can sleep with a bunch of chicks as long as they don't mean anything? Am I making up stuff or did some of the SW books imply that Yoda was a little green pimp?

      -B

    6. Re:They might just as well have put by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      It's more interesting if you look at professional athletes.
      The managers ask them to not have sex with their spouses for months before a competition, but it seems that fairly new research points towards that it is actually beneficial to have sex near an event, and helps the muscles rather than wears them out.

      This is from what I remember from a newspaper article, so take it as you want..

    7. Re:They might just as well have put by Rhonwyn · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did imply in the books that Yoda was a little green pimp. Before he was 900 years old, he was a big ol flirt.

      But wait, this is the Jedi universe, which is of course fully consistant in all of the movies, books, comics, etc. Right?

    8. Re:They might just as well have put by JonMartin · · Score: 1
      "Virgin (Y/N)?"

      Are you implying that there are only 20,000 virgins in Canada? Because that would be impressive - no, wait, DISTURBING - if true.

      --
      Serve Gonk.
    9. Re:They might just as well have put by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Am I making up stuff or did some of the SW books imply that Yoda was a little green pimp? Don't know, but talks kinda like a Soviet Russia joke he does.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  4. Jedi worshippers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They worship Jedis? I should become one and become their god!!!

  5. No wonder by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    How else can you explain all the Americans who can't figgure out where the heck Canada is! And yes I'm Canadian :)

    p.s. This isn't the country you're looking for.

    --
    I stole this Sig
    1. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      He was trying to impersonate an american accent. You know, like your national leaders:
      figure - figgure
      potato - potatoe

    2. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How else can you explain all the Americans who can't figgure out where the heck Canada is! And yes I'm Canadian :)

      LOL, yea, they are all living in Florida and can't fill out or count ballots. Explains all the Ontario license plates there!

    3. Re:No wonder by Clived · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yay quantaman

      We Canadians live in an environment of totally crappy government on all levels, an unaware and basically ignorant populace on all levels of local and global political awareness. With all the crap that this country is going through, a percentage of our voting public are going to subscribe to some mythical "religion" from a movie ? No wonder things don't work here. No wonder the rest of the world can't take us seriously.

      This isn't the country I was looking for, sadly

      --
      Clive DaSilva Email: clive.dasilva@gmail.com Ubuntu 18.10 Kernel 4.18
    4. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't take it too hard. I imagine all countries are pretty much the same (I know the US is). I've enjoyed visiting Canada.

    5. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hehehe. Come on moderators where is your sense of sarcasim.

      Sadly its not trollish because so many Americans believe this crap. Many southern Americans( conservative, ignorant, and very pro bush) especially believe Canadians think our system is better. They brag about how America has the best health system in the world and how we are the envy of the world. Republicans really do believe Americans will lose health care quality, taxes would double, and patients could no longer pick doctors.

    6. Re:No wonder by nolife · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Hawaii, I had a software rebate rejected from Corel (Canadian) because "The offer was only good in the United States and Canada".
      Somebody at the rebate processing facility must have failed geography. When I called the toll free number they laughed and sent the check.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    7. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crank alert.

    8. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying the American system is the best, but if Canada's system was sufficient, why are Canadian citizens paying money to be treated in the US?

      Here's an interesting read: http://collection.nlc-bnc.ca/100/201/300/cdn_medic al_association/cmaj/vol-159/issue-11/1395.htm

      A few quotes from the article:

      When they discussed medicare's underlying values, Avery described the system as "legislated mediocrity" and Decter called it a "social good." They even disagreed on the extent of the role of the private sector in Canadian health care. Avery contended that "over $1 billion of American health care is purchased by Canadians who cross the border because they don't trust the system here,"

    9. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if Canada's system was sufficient, why are Canadian citizens paying money to be treated in the US?

      Because they can.

      In Canada, rich people get treated exactly the same by the health care system. As in: if there's someone in more need than they are, they must wait their turn.

      In the US, rich people just go to a hospital that caters to rich people.

      The people in the US who are scared of the Canadian system are the rich people who are afraid they'll get treated like everybody else. (Hmm, doesn't your Bill of Rights state that everyone is created equal? So, wouldn't all these rich people be UnAmerican?)

    10. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that "US and Canada" or "CONTINENTAL US and Canada"?

    11. Re:No wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The offer was only good in the United States and Canada".I heard something similar once about a guy in Santa Fe.

    12. Re:No wonder by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      Wrong!

      The poll was surved from retired Canadians in Florida. It was asked if they had a serious condition would they fly back to Canada or pay for it in Florida?

      Now if the survey was actually conducted in Canada it would be different. The survey was paid for by the medical insurance industry, AMA, as well as from lobbiest from the Republican National Commitee.

  6. Chewbackbacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought wookies were the minority in Canada!

    1. Re:Chewbackbacon by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      I live with a Wookie, but alas I do not live in Canada. Btw before living with him I never realized Wookies could be so short, fat, and stinky. They sure are hairy though...

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
  7. What do you expect by Gefiltefish · · Score: 2, Funny


    This is no surprise. Besides drinking beer and watching hockey, what else is there to do in Canada besides using the force?

    Besides, the hairy palms insulate against the cold winters.

    1. Re:What do you expect by Mikkee · · Score: 0

      yeah you're right but at least we dont have to spend billions on star wars project to protect our ass. :P

    2. Re:What do you expect by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      You forgot eating Back Bacon and building Igloo's..

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    3. Re:What do you expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always at those wacky southern neighbours...

      "I'm sorry we called George Bush a moron. He is a moron, but it wasn't nice of us to point it out. If it's any consolation, the fact that he's a moron shouldn't reflect poorly on the people of America. After all, it's not like you actually elected him..."

      "I'm sorry for Alan Thicke, Shania Twain, Celine Dion, Loverboy, that song from Seriff that ends with a really high-pitched long note. Your beer. I know we had nothing to do with your beer, but we feel your pain."

      "And finally on behalf of all Canadians, I'm sorry that we're constantly apologizing for things in a passive-aggressive way which is really a thinly veiled criticism. I sincerely hope that you're not upset over this. Because we've seen what you do to countries you get upset with."

      -- Anthony St George

  8. Census takers by worst_name_ever · · Score: 5, Funny
    20,000 lightsabre-wielding census-takers is nothing to sneeze at.

    I think you mean census respondents... census-takers are the people who come to your door asking you to fill out the census form. If one of those folks whipped out a lightsaber on me I think I'd try to do an extra-good job of filling in the little bubbles...

    --

    In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    1. Re:Census takers by Enonu · · Score: 1

      Me personally, I'm not afraid.

      A census taker once tried to test me.-- I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice chianti.

    2. Re:Census takers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it assumed that all Jedi are knights? That'd be like assuming that all Christians are Cardinals (or however their system works). What about the Jedi equivalent of squires, alter boys and so forth?

    3. Re:Census takers by Savatte · · Score: 1

      20,000 lightsabre-wielding census-takers is nothing to sneeze at

      Yeah, especially with the SARS outbreak in Toronto.

    4. Re:Census takers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Hero

  9. Go England! by big_groo · · Score: 3, Funny
    In the U.K., for example, there are more Jedis than Jews. Nearly 400,000 people identified themselves as Jedi in the 2001 census. Only 260,000 said they were Jewish. The Jedis seemed to be concentrated in England and Wales.

    *waves hand* There is nothing to see here. Move along.

    1. Re:Go England! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      In other news, a glowing blue image of Sir Alec Guinness wishes all these damned kids would get off his lawn.

    2. Re:Go England! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 4, Informative

      I really wanted to put Jedi down on my Census, but the I had heard rumours that the UK government were going to fine people who put religion as Jedi so I chickened out.

      As it turns out, the only part of the census the government can't fine you for is the religion option... as this snippet from a 2001 Register article says here :

      We spoke to the Home Office - which was not overly entertained especially since the Census is supposed to be deadly serious. However the Home Office would not say what constituted a religion and we subsequently discovered that while you can be heavily fined for putting down false details on a census form, it does not apply to the religion question.

      Ah well... I think 400,000 was more than enough anyway ;)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    3. Re:Go England! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "I really wanted to put Jedi down on my Census, but the I had heard rumours that the UK government were going to fine people who put religion as Jedi so I chickened out"

      You truly are the ultimate pussy. Do you buy sponges from door-to-door salesmen too?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    4. Re:Go England! by freddled · · Score: 1

      This is true, go here

    5. Re:Go England! by Downside · · Score: 1
      I really wanted to put Jedi down on my Census, but the I had heard rumours that the UK government were going to fine people who put religion as Jedi so I chickened out...As it turns out, the only part of the census the government can't fine you for is the religion option

      You should have read it before you signed it... it said that on the front cover!

    6. Re:Go England! by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Ah yes.. the ultimate pussy. Because I didn't put down a comedic religion on my UK Census. That *has* to make me into a total wimp!

      Get a grip mate.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    7. Re:Go England! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, because you didn't _dare_ put down a comedic religion. That's what makes you a wimp

    8. Re:Go England! by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in Canada, the Jedis only really outnumber the Wiccans, of which we have 10,000. Muslims outnumber Jews though, almost two-to-one again.

      What a strange country I live in.

      --Dan

    9. Re:Go England! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i heard that too, but there ended up being 4 jedi in my household,

      may the force be with you....

    10. Re:Go England! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I hijack this comment to point out that, contrary to what the article says above, it was indeed The United Kingdom which first had mass Jedis in the census. Australia did in 4 or 5 months later. We are the original Jedis, and while it hasn't forced the government to acknowledge Jedi as a religion it has forced them (or so I heard) to add it as a tick box on the next census :-)

  10. lightsaber kid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if the jedi religion has a god, this kid is it:

    http://www.waxy.org/archive/2003/04/29/star_war. sh tml

    1. Re:lightsaber kid by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
      Christ, i'm a nerd, and i want to kick this kids ass.

      (i disabled the trailer, if anyone wants it, or the new version, e-mail or IM me, thats right starwars and mullets)

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  11. hmmm... by jeffy124 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (standard disclaimer: IANAL)

    I know in the US someone can register for religious recognition if they have something like 100 followers. (i dont know the exact number) The application can be accepted as long as no animal or person is sacrificed or otherwise eliminated as part of the religion's practice. Other requirements probably have to be met, but I do know that religious killings are a no-no.

    Canada probably has something similar. Maybe someone should consider institutionalizing the Jedi religion and filing the proper paperwork.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:hmmm... by mharris007 · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the whole religion recruitment process.

      1) Do you have a girlfriend?
      2) Besides having a girlfriend, do you ever have sex?
      3) Do members of the opposite sex dare speak with you?

      If you answer No to these questions, you should join our church, The Church of the Jedi!

      --


      ---
      Mike
      I'm going to kick the next person that I see with their karma rating in their sig.
    2. Re:hmmm... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

      Actually, I doubt it is as easy as that. The Scientologists, admittedly a bunch of kooks (they'll probably sue me for saying that), have been struggling for some time to get recognition as a religion, complete with tax-free property ownership and such. As far as I know, it's been fairly difficult.

    3. Re:hmmm... by Greyhand · · Score: 5, Funny
      If someone set up an "official" jedi religion, George Lucas would sue the hell out of them. This in turn would set a precident allowing religions to be sued.
      1. Someone creates the official jedi religion
      2. George Lucas sues them
      3. Precident set : religions can be sued
      4. I sue the major world religions for upsetting world peace
      5. PROFIT!!!!
    4. Re:hmmm... by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

      The US government is Constitutionally prohibited from sanctioning any state religion. In recent decades that has been bastardized into not recognizing any religion.

      Others responding to you seem to be confusing IRS not-for-profit status with religion. They are not the same. The Catholic Church and the NAACP both enjoy not-for-profit status, but the latter is not a religion even though they both have the same tax status.

      BTW, not-for-profit != "non-profit", the former is a tax status (more precisely a not-federally-and-other-places-taxed status) and the latter means you do not make a profit. Yes, there is a huge reality difference and a small technical difference.

    5. Re:hmmm... by Flounder · · Score: 1
      The US government is Constitutionally prohibited from sanctioning any state religion. In recent decades that has been bastardized into not recognizing any religion.

      By far one of the most intelligent statements I've read on /. in years.

      Others responding to you seem to be confusing IRS not-for-profit status with religion. They are not the same. The Catholic Church and the NAACP both enjoy not-for-profit status, but the latter is not a religion even though they both have the same tax status.

      Granted, there are those that perceive the Catholic Church as a business, and the NAACP as a religion.

      BTW, not-for-profit != "non-profit", the former is a tax status (more precisely a not-federally-and-other-places-taxed status) and the latter means you do not make a profit. Yes, there is a huge reality difference and a small technical difference.

      So, theoretically, the failure of hundreds of dot-com businesses could have been slowed, or even stopped, by petitioning for IRS Not-for-profit status? Certainly would have been more descriptive of their business practices.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    6. Re:hmmm... by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Nice response! Well thought, but I believe I responded to this:

      So, theoretically, the failure of hundreds of dot-com businesses could have been slowed, or even stopped, by petitioning for IRS Not-for-profit status? Certainly would have been more descriptive of their business practices.

      in the paragraph you were responding to. Nope, the dot-coms were for-profit and did not make a profit. Quite a difference from what I wrote.

    7. Re:hmmm... by balthan · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US government is Constitutionally prohibited from sanctioning any state religion. In recent decades that has been bastardized into not recognizing any religion.

      "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Seems pretty straight forward to me.

    8. Re:hmmm... by Flounder · · Score: 1
      Nope, the dot-coms were for-profit and did not make a profit.

      But does the intention to make a profit, and not actually making a profit, render them unqualified to receive IRS Not-For-Profit status. Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition has Not-For-Profit status, and yet his organization has earned a profit. I'm sure the NAACP would love to make a profit if they could.

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    9. Re:hmmm... by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      Now how can any religion be "recognised" in a nation where Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion?

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    10. Re:hmmm... by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Yep, "he US government is Constitutionally prohibited from sanctioning any state religion,== "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." Quite different from recognizing any at all.

    11. Re:hmmm... by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Nope. Has some to do with distribution of earnings and such. The IRS has all sorts of info on it that I have long forgotten (other than the edges) since college.

      I thought the NAACP made quite a hefty profit too, if not how do they keep operating with those giant salaries of the top guys?

      BTW, the John Burch(sp?) Society (I have never been a member) has never applied for NFP status because they did not want to become dependant on the government telling them how to operate. At least that is what their heads said on C-SPAN during a speech.

    12. Re:hmmm... by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      If there are limits to my freedom of speech, there should be limits to my freedom of religion as well judging by the wording. If government recognizes certain religions with one god, but not those with many gods, that may unconstitutionally limit a multi-god belivers freedom.

      Is it possible that the founding fathers lived in an environment where all valid religions were based on one god, and so there was no reason not to use God in some important government documents?

    13. Re:hmmm... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      The reason is because they charge money for services and religious ceremonies. That classifies them as for-profit in the eyes of the law, which is the main reason they've had so much trouble in that respect - giving of money is COMPULSORY in Scientology, not voluntary.

    14. Re:hmmm... by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      It means that the religion is recognized as existing, and as such, people that practice it can't be discriminated against on the basis of their religion. The Constitution is merely saying that the state is not allowed to ENDORSE (a) religion. Which is why I don't understand why the "Under God" part of the pledge being declared unconstitutional caused such a flap, other than for zealousness - it implies endorsement of religion. But that's an argument that belongs elsewhere, lest I stray offtopic.

    15. Re:hmmm... by bandit450 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally! The missing step has been filled in! So THAT'S what I do to make heaps of money.

      --
      -- Bandit450...If-Else-Do-*TWITCH*!
    16. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out this website:

      http://www.jediism.org

      Its Mission and Code is amusing--given the impression that its community is serious.

    17. Re:hmmm... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1
      The US government is Constitutionally prohibited from sanctioning any state religion. In recent decades that has been bastardized into not recognizing any religion.

      But factually the president of the USA and his administration use the word god in nearly every speech they make. Even dollar bills have "In god we trust".

      So whatever your constitution says on not sanctionning religion, it does not apply to your government IN FACTS, because the things I describe are part of the state.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    18. Re:hmmm... by Surak · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shouldn't that be,

      5. PROPHET!!!

      ? :)

    19. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could guess about that until the end of the universe. But it's safer to assume they wanted us to avoid the question altogether, rather than try to "guess" what their personal feelings were regarding religion. This is a government, not a personality cult. Try Maoism if you like to mix the two.

    20. Re:hmmm... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      The complete seperation of church and state is one of the keys to real freedom, regardless of what you worship friend.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    21. Re:hmmm... by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      You are allowed to sacrifice an animal. After all, millions of Christians sacrifice unborn chicken fetusus every Easter.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    22. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they already have been sued. did you not see the mass ammount of media of those molested kids now adults suing the hell out of catholic diocese???

    23. Re:hmmm... by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right now it takes DVD-Rs 2 discs to back up a movie (dual-layer vs. single layer). It would be nice to archive my movie collections using less media.

      Bah, who cares one way or another. The government, since it's meant to represent ALL the people, should not, ever, EVER, incorporate religious doctrine, symbolism, etc, into it's workings. Yes, that includes no "under god" in the pledge of allegiance, or religious phrases on currency. Why? Because it's plainly obvious (to anyone who isn't trying to argue their way out of a corner) that the "god" mentioned is the Christian God, thus excluding all else. Clearly, this is a VERY bad thing for a government which is "by the people, for the people", and hopefully, ALL people. It results in people being excluded, because those who are not part of the "not-quite-state-sponsored" religion are left out.

      A better question is, why should the government endorse/recognize any religion at all? What purpose does this serve? WTF is the phrase "under god" included in the pledge of allegiance, other than to counter the "godless communists" of the cold war era? Frankly, I see no need for it... religion is a personal matter, and belongs in the home and in the church. It does NOT belong in the government that runs the country.

    24. Re:hmmm... by PimpNinjaWannaBee · · Score: 0
      I've modified your business plan according an ancient golden rule. Now it has a greater chance of being successful.
      1. Someone creates the official jedi religion
      2. George Lucas sues them
      3. Precident set : religions can be sued
      4. I sue the major world religions for upsetting world peace
      5. ?????
      6. PROFIT!!!!
    25. Re:hmmm... by KrispyKringle · · Score: 1

      Isn't a tithe compulsory? At least if you want to get into heaven?

    26. Re:hmmm... by Mozai · · Score: 1

      I looked into this for the Universal Life Church.

      Religions are recognized on a provincial (== state in America) level, not federal (== national). I was told I had to have a congregation of at least 30 that meets once a week, certification by the religious order, and the religion has to be established for at least 20 years outside of the province. There was more, but that's for starters.

      Without these qualifcations and the rubber-stamp-of-approval from the province, I'm not allowed to officiate for marriages nor for funeral rites.

    27. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is a very good reason for not taxing relgion... the power to tax is the power to destroy.

    28. Re:hmmm... by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      However in recognizing something as a religion, one presumably would NOT be recognoizing something else as a religion. Which means defining what IS a recognizable religion. Which means creating a law with respect to the establishment of religion.

      Sorry, you can't have your cake and eat it too. If you recognize ANYTHING as a religion then its the same as recognizing nothing at all, because it is a meaningless distinction.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    29. Re:hmmm... by kommakazi · · Score: 0

      No they don't, don't you know the eggs we eat were never going to hatch anyways?

  12. Religion Question? by mharris007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Which brings up a question; Should Religion be a question on a national census form?

    If people are getting offended by the race question on the U.S. census form, I can just imagine the number of people that are going to get pissed off by a religion question.

    --


    ---
    Mike
    I'm going to kick the next person that I see with their karma rating in their sig.
    1. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's one of those optional questions that's only done for statistical purposes. Religious leaders can then use those numbers to see how their religion is expanding, what trends there are, etc.

    2. Re:Religion Question? by kovarg · · Score: 1

      The one that really gets me is when the option of Aetheist is listed as a religion. What's that about? Anyone else tripped out by that one?

      --
      blame me!
    3. Re:Religion Question? by RestiffBard · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For the people that are going to say its no one's business about this or that or how many toilets they have and so forth allow me a moment. First off, the toilet question was a real question from the 2000 US Census.

      Now, before people get up in arms there are legitimate reasons for wanting this data. And they in no way harm any citizen. They are designed to help citizens.

      For instance, the Marklar race respond that on average they earn 12,000 a year and have no indoor toilet. This lets the government know 1. Marklars may not be getting the racial equality that in the US should be mandatory. 2. Marklars are not properly being serviced by their government. This is rudimentary but you get the idea (i hope).

      as for the questions, a curious thing happened in 2000. people complained about the questions, race, toilets, salary etc... Trent Lott, then Senate Majority Leader said that if people didn't want to answer the questions then the Census had no right to compel people to do so.

      Here's the funny part. 1. the Census is meant only to count heads. 2. the other questions on the Census are tacked on by Congress 3. Congress in fact gives the Census the mandate to compel people to answer. 4. Trent Lott is an obvious asshat.

      Finally for all of you clever people that thought the Census wouldn't count you if you closed the blinds when ever an enumerator came by you're wrong. Enumerators, towards the end of the Census would park at the end of your street and count people entering and leaving. How many cars in the driveway? How many people-size shadows behind the curtains? They would make an educated guess at the number and put that down.

      Where is the 2000 Census data now? Arizona. In a big vault for the most part.

      How do I know? That's where I Fed-Exed it. I was a Census Clerk for 2000. No, I really didn't care what you wrote down.

      By the way, James Weatherby of 3247 Main St. has 5 bathrooms.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    4. Re:Religion Question? by aron_wallaker · · Score: 1

      Well, in most of Canada there is a public Catholic school system that draws funding from the same source as the general public school system (property taxes or provincial income taxes, depending on where you are). Meanwhile any other religous school cannot draw upon the same government funding. Why ? Well the Catholic school system was set up before Canada was a country, so it has tradition....and Catholicism is still the largest religion in the country.
      Why have 'religion' on the census ? At some point (I hope) we're going to sit down and review the numbers and decide if the government should really be financing one religious education program and not others.

    5. Re:Religion Question? by rcf · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You should question religion instead

    6. Re:Religion Question? by soul_cmd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well acording to the Jargon File (referenced at dict.org) agnostic is a religion.

      Religion

      Agnostic. Atheist. Non-observant Jewish. Neo-pagan. Very commonly, three or more of these are combined in the same person. Conventional faith-holding Christianity is rare though not unknown.

      Even hackers who identify with a religious affiliation tend to be relaxed about it, hostile to organized religion in general and all forms of
      religious bigotry in particular. Many enjoy parody' religions such as Discordianism and the Church of the SubGenius.

      Also, many hackers are influenced to varying degrees by Zen Buddhism or (less commonly) Taoism, and blend them easily with their `native'
      religions.

      There is a definite strain of mystical, almost Gnostic sensibility that shows up even among those hackers not actively involved with neo-paganism, Discordianism, or Zen. Hacker folklore that pays homage to `wizards' and speaks of incantations and demons has too much psychological truthfulness about it to be entirely a joke.

      Though, for real definitions:
      Strictness of fidelity in conforming to any practice, as if it were an enjoined rule of conduct.

      The outward act or form by which men indicate their recognition of the existence of a god or of gods having power over their destiny, to whom obedience, service, and honor are due; the feeling or expression of human love, fear, or awe of some superhuman and overruling power, whether by profession of belief, by observance of rites and ceremonies, or by the conduct of life; a system of faith and worship; a manifestation of piety; as, ethical religions; monotheistic religions; natural religion; revealed religion; the religion of the Jews; the religion of idol worshipers.

      I suppose it just depends on your viewpoint.

    7. Re:Religion Question? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      If I see "race" or "religion" options on forms for employment or other legal documents I just cross them off and don't answer them. It's absolutely no one's business what the answer to either of those two questions.

      Those two questions are only used for political purposes and I refuse to play that kind of a game.

    8. Re:Religion Question? by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      By the way, James Weatherby of 3247 Main St. has 5 bathrooms.

      Obviously Mr. Weatherby is a man who's always on the run(s).

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    9. Re:Religion Question? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      sure, how else can we continue to provide programs for the 'oppressed?'

    10. Re:Religion Question? by scotch · · Score: 1
      "Aetheism" isn't anything as far as I can tell. If you ask atheists about their beliefs, you'll find that at least for some of them, atheism isn't a religion. Agnosticism, isn't a religion either, but then it's possible to be an agnostic theist or an agnostic atheist.

      HAND

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    11. Re:Religion Question? by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      fsckin funny

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    12. Re:Religion Question? by echucker · · Score: 4, Funny

      The one that really gets me is when the option of Aetheist is listed as a religion. What's that about? Anyone else tripped out by that one?

      They only have it because most census respondents don't know who the hell that CowboyNeal guy is.

    13. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And put on your blindfold while the government gets ya' from the backside.

    14. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how anybody would be offended, since everybody in the United States is a Christian.

    15. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about starting up your own charity?!

    16. Re:Religion Question? by w1r3sp33d · · Score: 1

      Jedi's just need a good lobby to get theaters to play all the episodes in rotation along with THX1138 once in a while, and install bathrooms that have robe friendly urinals! If anything the low cost of maintaining "Jedi" as a religion should encourage the Canadian government to embrace this idea. When I give my two cents on things like this, why do I always get change?

    17. Re:Religion Question? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gnostics believe that you can know. Agnostics believe you can't know. Diagnostics believe in a deeper knowledge of the divine through a better understanding of diesel mechanics.

    18. Re:Religion Question? by joycea · · Score: 1

      I think religion is a very valid question for a census, as well as race. The idea of the census is to judge where government should be gearing resources and focusing attention. IMO, it is necessary for a government to have an idea of the demographics of the population it is making decisions for. Let's try to not be over-sensitive on issues. While I agree that race and religion should not be used in a discriminatory manner, we do have to recognize that there are differences. Let's just make sure that we are celebrating them, not prosecuting them.

    19. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's discordianism? I've never heard of that one. Are there any websites about it?

    20. Re:Religion Question? by daveo0331 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Excerpt from Census form:

      9. Describe your religious beliefs:

      a. Christian conservative
      b. Other Christian
      c. Please add my name to John Ashcroft's list of "suspicious persons"

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    21. Re:Religion Question? by joycea · · Score: 1

      You will also find that the Catholic school boards are more than just tradition. They were part of the the agreement for (IIRC) Manitoba and Saskatchewan to join Upper and Lower Canada (Quebec and Ontario) in the Dominion of Canada.

      It is a part of Canadian law that is harder to fight and drop then you might imagine, like native hunting rights, the Queen being the Head of State and Quebec wanting to sucede.

    22. Re:Religion Question? by anagama · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are interested in athiesm, here's a better definition.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    23. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sarcasm is killing me. Why don't you move to the middle east and bitch about everyone being Muslim? Oh, America is such a bad place!

    24. Re:Religion Question? by franimal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I received a census form a few months back and after reading the "You are required by law to truthfully complete this survey" statement, I decided to give them a call. Guess what. That religious and race data gets used. It's available to all those congress men and women just itching to do a little social engineering and earmark funds for their various flavors of constituents. For instance, the woman I talked to indicated something along the lines of "I there is an area with a high race concentration that has difficulties they may be elligible for special funding."

      The good thing is that she also indicated that it'd be acceptable if I entered 'DECLINED' in the objectionable boxes. Even though it's really not optional ... they'd prefer that to a lie or the bother of fines/legal action.

      The really bad thing is that this data gets used and it's likely not even right! How many people intentionally enter false data? The really infuriating thing is that this data, perhaps incorrect, is used to collect information on social engineering programs like affirmative action. Yes, it makes sense. But it still drives me nuts.

    25. Re:Religion Question? by Kris+Thalamus · · Score: 0

      Classifying atheism as a type of religion is like classifying health as a type of disease.

    26. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Should Religion be a question on a national census form?

      Yes, but if Religion wins, I'm still not gonna believe.

    27. Re:Religion Question? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw it, I'll be a polytheistic athiest...in other words, I disbeleive in many gods :)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    28. Re:Religion Question? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For instance, the Marklar race respond that on average they earn 12,000 a year and have no indoor toilet. This lets the government know
      1. Marklars may not be getting the racial equality that in the US should be mandatory.
      2. Marklars are not properly being serviced by their government.

      1. Does this mean that short folks are going to get leg implants so they can be equal to us tall folks?
      2. If the Marklars REALLY want toilets, why can't they earn them, just like the rest of us did?

      Seriously, you're right: that's exactly the sort of thinking that lead congress-critters to put that sort of garbage on the long form. My point was that that sort of thinking varies from simply muddled to dangerously wrong.

      If racial equality (defined as average income, or anything meaningful) is to be mandatory, we'll have to begin by eliminating our constitution. How else do you propose to get the alcoholism rate on reservations down to that of the general population (or else the general population's alcoholism rate up to match theirs)? We're going to have to start holding the able back, because there's no way we're going to be able to push the unable up to match them.

      Anyone who really thinks that ``able'' correlates to race is dead wrong. But, ``able'' does correlate pretty well to culture. Look at the different success rates for new Asian and Carribean immigrants, compared to the grandchildren of earlier immigrants from those same areas. As their families acculturate here, their academic and business achievments tend to fall toward (or below) the mean for the US.

      ... Senate Majority Leader said that if people didn't want to answer the questions then the Census had no right to compel people to do so.

      Here's the funny part. 1. the Census is meant only to count heads. 2. the other questions on the Census are tacked on by Congress 3. Congress in fact gives the Census the mandate to compel people to answer.

      The constitution requires the government to count heads. The constitution therefore gives the government the power to count heads. Since there is no constitutional mandate to count toilets, any governmental power to do that would have to be found in the emanations of the penumbra of the commerce clause. Since the Supremes are starting to take a sane view of the commerce clause, as the 10th amendment requires, choosing not to require people to answer the questions may well be the better part of valor: congress may not have felt that it was worth trying to defend the long form before the Supreme court. On a side note, the long form is out (too intrusive, said congress), to be replaced with the American Community Survey, whose funding is in danger. We may just not know about toilet counts in future years. Just like we didn't for most of our history.

      Where is the 2000 Census data now? Arizona. In a big vault for the most part.

      The forms may be in Arizona, but the data is in a big mainframe in Washington, D.C. Aggregated, perturbed-to-preserve-privacy summaries have been sent (via CD and DVD) all over the US, so that dangerously muddle-headed politicians and civil servants can use it to show that more of someone else's money needs to be spent on the civil servants, in the name of the Marklars.

    29. Re:Religion Question? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      The idea of the census is to judge where government should be gearing resources and focusing attention.

      No, it's to allocate representative districts so that they correspond reasonably well to the voting population. The rest is just cruft grafted on to the system.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    30. Re:Religion Question? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA RELIGION QUESTIONS YOU!

      -1, Flamebait, and then some more text to bypass the lamness filter.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    31. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, try KBuxtons Page, it's pretty authoritive. Discordianism is like Subgeniism's older, more serious cousin. It shows up a lot in Robert Anton Wilsons "Illuminatus!" trilogy.

      Full disclosure: Poster is lapsed Subgenius.

    32. Re:Religion Question? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      IMO atheism is a religion because atheists have faith that there is no god.

      I would say that only agnostics are truly without religion.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    33. Re:Religion Question? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      faith != religion

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    34. Re:Religion Question? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      In the name of the father, son and holy goat.

      Amen.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    35. Re:Religion Question? by ojQj · · Score: 1
      Anyone who really thinks that ``able'' correlates to race is dead wrong. But, ``able'' does correlate pretty well to culture. Look at the different success rates for new Asian and Carribean immigrants, compared to the grandchildren of earlier immigrants from those same areas. As their families acculturate here, their academic and business achievments tend to fall toward (or below) the mean for the US.

      Well it's a matter of opinion of course, but I think that able has its highest correlation to education. This in turn correlates to the wealth of the family or nation in question. New Asian immigrants from Vietnam for example perform about as well as new immigrants from Mexico (warning: word-of-mouth statistic). Also, when you look at the US's success stories rebuilding countries (Germany, Japan), they all seem to have a pre-existing highly educated populous. This makes me think that US will have some success in Iraq (even without forcing a western culture down their throats), but that Afghanistan probably won't work. In addition if you sort black students by academic success, you'll find that at almost every level, that rich black kids perform much closer to white kids in the same economic class (warning: another word-of-mouth statistic). I suspect that any remaining difference could be explained away based on the education level of the parents, as parents also play an important role in the education of their children.

      In other words: I don't buy the culture argument any more than I buy the race argument. I think a capable populous has to be built by steadily simultaneously increasing the wealth and education of a populous.

      Of course my conclusion (unscientific as I admit it is in its current form) has implications for the future success of the US. Are those tax cuts being taken out of school budgets?

    36. Re:Religion Question? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Religion is a belief in a higher power. Therefore in order to be religious you must have faith in that higher power.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    37. Re:Religion Question? by tmalone · · Score: 1

      if you think that's bad, guess what happens when you don't put any data in the box. I'll give you a hint, they don't just leave it blank. They use other reported data to "allocate" a correct response for you. At least, that's what they do in the US.
      For instance, say you're black and you decided to put "declined" in the race category. Lets say you live in a predominantly white neighborhood. The census people will look at the neighborhood you live in, and put down that you're white. This is why the "leave it blank!" campaigns are so stupid. Yeah sure, leave it blank. Go ahead and thwart any attempts at addressing the horrible things that were done to blacks in the past.

    38. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Religion should not have ANYTHING to do with any government decision. It is not something a government should have anything at all to do with, because the potential for abuse is too strong. What if GWB decided to "leak" a little data on unbelievers to a couple church groups, to help the righteous forces of converters? Laugh if you like but I can see a strongly religous person believing this cause to be above the law and doing it. This would constitute harassment and be a tremendous violation of privacy, and not much could be done in a practical manner. If the releaser is enough of a zealot they might not even care if they got prosecuted, if they are helping to "save" souls. Religion is a very very dangerous thing, and it should be left strictly to individual choice. The census has no business asking, and the government has no business knowing.

    39. Re:Religion Question? by ajs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The one that really gets me is when the option of Aetheist is listed as a religion

      In that sense, Atheist is being used as a "none of the above", which is a more valid use than some I've seen.

      Is atheism a religion? I'm willing to roughly define religion as "a belief system, generaly characterized by the personification of natural forces, worship of same and a system of ritual." In that sense no, atheism is not a religion.

      On the other hand, if you simply defined it as, "a set of beliefs concerning a system of one or more deities," then yes, atheism is a religion, at least as practiced by some.

      I have a friend, for example who has what I would characterize as a "deep and irrational faith" in the non-existance of all gods and the evils of all religion. This is his core faith in the way the universe works, and I can't really make a strong distinction between that and believing that the Post Office box down the street created the universe in 22 nanoseconds out of the belly-button lint of Winston Churchill.

      I, on the other hand am a strict agnostic. I have reached what I consider to be one of only three rational conclusions about religion: that we currently have no conclusive proof that there are any deities, and even if George Burns poped into my living room today and whisked my off to a distant galaxy to show me wonders beyond my imagining, I would still have no proof of anything but a George Burns-looking guy with some amazing abilities (at least to make me see cool stuff, if not actually manifest cool stuff) and a god-complex.

      The other two rational conclusions are a) Pascal was a jerk for pointing it out, but he was right... choose a religion based on the degree of the negative outcome it predicts and hope you're right (note, such people are still technically agnostic in my book) and b) There are more important things to wory about. Enjoy the sun-rise and then get back to work.

      FWIW: When I was about 10, I realized that I was an atheist (I didn't know the term agnostic, much less "strict agnostic" at the time), and in thinking about what that meant I was perhaps more terrified than I have ever been. It's a big deal for a 10 year old to have to face the insignificance of his own existance all at once, but I got over it and decided that I wanted to enjoy it while it lasted anyway.

      I've since refined my sense of ethics based, not on fear of reprisals by a deity, but on the drives that I have in terms of a comfortable society of tolerant peers. Woefully there are too many folks in the world who will never introspect to that degree. For them, religion seems a fair way to deliver a moral and ethical outlook that they'll never have the inclination to generate for themselves.

    40. Re:Religion Question? by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just one nit to pick - although your description of how the census works is PERFECT I have one problem with

      2. Marklars are not properly being serviced by their government

      Where does it say that it's the Government's job to make sure that Marklars have the same number and kinds of toilets?
      It's fairly obvious that it's NOT interstate commerce, even if that is the excuse the courts use!

      The Federal Government upsurps way to many powers that were reserved for the states or the people, but thats the way it's been since "The switch in time that saved nine"

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    41. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, I get upset about the race question. And the sex question, and the location and name questions too. I don't go around asking people stupid questions, why should I have to suffer it? Mind your own damn business, is all I have to say.

    42. Re:Religion Question? by dejaffa · · Score: 1

      No, religion is your relationship with the higher power. Non-belief is a relationship (albeit not exactly a close one), therefore being atheist is a religion.

      --
      There is no 'i' in team, but there is in fiasco...
    43. Re:Religion Question? by spakka · · Score: 1

      Certainly, if you make up your own definitions, then atheism may be a religion.

    44. Re:Religion Question? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      IMO atheism is a religion because atheists have faith that there is no god.

      No they don't. Some might, but many (myself included) don't. All you can say is that they don't believe in any god.

      Even for those that do have faith that there is no god, I'm not sure that makes atheism a religion. Do people say that their religion is "theism"?

      I would say that only agnostics are truly without religion.

      Depends on your definition of agnostism. Agnostic theists wouldn't be without religion. And what would you say about agnostic atheists?

      I haven't had to do a census (I never received a form, for whatever reason), but my answer to what my religion is is generally one of "none", "n/a" or "my own set of beliefs - I haven't given it a name".

    45. Re:Religion Question? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      No, religion is your relationship with the higher power.

      But atheism is having no relationship with any higher power.

      What's more, I can't help feeling that your statement of "the higher power" almost implies that it is true that there exists a higher power, and atheists are merely denying this.

    46. Re:Religion Question? by dejaffa · · Score: 1

      But atheism is having no relationship with any higher power.

      That assumes that this is possible, which is just as much an assumption (i.e. an unproven statement, scientifically speaking, and probably unprovable) as my belief that one exists.

      --
      There is no 'i' in team, but there is in fiasco...
    47. Re:Religion Question? by pcb · · Score: 1

      It is a part of Canadian law that is harder to fight and drop then you might imagine.

      This is simply not true. Both Quebec and Newfoundland removed religious based schools from their public systems within the last 5 years. In both cases, this required a constitutional change. This did not prove difficult (as no other provinces objected - I believe you need 8 out of 10 provinces or greater than 50% of the population to affect a constitutional change - but I could be wrong). In the case of Newfoundland, I believe a referendum was also held, which obviously passed.

      The fact that Ontario still has a publically funded Catholic school board is both strange and backwards. I'm not sure which other provinces have religious boards, but when I moved to Ontario from BC I found the idea very strange.

      -PCB

      --
      'Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.' B. Pascal
    48. Re:Religion Question? by RestiffBard · · Score: 1
      Where does it say that it's the Government's job to make sure that Marklars have the same number and kinds of toilets?


      I'm not quite sure, but I believe its taken as being part of providing for welfare of the people. by welfare I don't mean free lunch but the basics like plumbing at the street. And no I can't see toilets having anything to do with interstate commerce.
      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    49. Re:Religion Question? by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can see that being the job of the LOCAL government (plumbing in the streeet), but the actual toilet, and the hookup? Private matter IMHO.

      So, if we assume this is part of the State/local/private section, why is the FEDERAL government asking?

      Of course, I still believe we are supposed to be "several states" with a common interest, and that the rights of the state outweigh the rights of the Federation, and that the rights of the person are greater than that of the State - In fact, the State/Federation have NO rights, they have powers GRANTED them - rights remain the provision of the people (and G_d, if you believe in one).

      Of course, this argument got kinda bloody the last time it was resolved. I agree with the North on the Slavery issue, but with the South on the States Rights issue

      That said, TIGER files are kinda useful :)

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    50. Re:Religion Question? by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      in the case of things like infrastructure many communities receive their funding from the federal government. hence the fed wanting to know how to set their agenda for the next ten years.

      also, the fed aren't the only ones that use the census as you well know. everyone uses census data. it might be that the census is only meant to count heads for the federal government but just as congress has tackedon extra questions so have local governments and businesses requested congress tack on questions that they wish answered. this is not a process I am happy about but it appears to be the process we have.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    51. Re:Religion Question? by CharlieG · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know that communities get funding from the Feds - and THAT is part of what I'm complaining about - it's NONE of the Federal Governments business - hense me reference to "the switch in time that saved nine" - The USSC was going to rule that much of FDRs "New deal" was an illegal upsurpation of State/local rights, and FDR let the USSC know that although he could not impeach them, if they DID rule against him, there was no law saying that the USSC had to only have 9 justices, and he would appoint enough new justices to allow the new deal to pass - The USSC changed their mind. It's the whole process of the erosion of States Rights via 2 main clauses - "General welfare" and "Interstate Commerce" - In fact, there had been NO rulings against the Federal Government expanding based upon "Interstate Commerce" until about 10 years ago. It was a BIG deal when the USSC finally said "No" Heck, there are laws on the books that have been upheald beacuse the wheat a farmer COULD grow COULD be entered into interstate commerce - and if THAT isn't a stretch...

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    52. Re:Religion Question? by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      New Asian immigrants from Vietnam for example perform about as well as new immigrants from Mexico (warning: word-of-mouth statistic).

      I suspect that word-of-mouth has let you down. I picked my examples because I know that those two groups (Asian and Carribean black) do as well as or better than American whites in the first and second generations, but Carribean blacks become statistically indistinguishable from American blacks by the third generation after immegration. There is no racial difference, but definitely a cultural difference.

      In addition if you sort black students by academic success, you'll find that at almost every level, that rich black kids perform much closer to white kids in the same economic class (warning: another word-of-mouth statistic).

      This one I agree with. That's a cultural difference. I went to college with some of those middle-class black kids you're talking about: they were raised in Alaska, and their cultural background was the same as mine (I'm white).

      I'm sure you're right about the importance of education, but I suspect that culture drives the education. I don't know about Vietnamese immegrants, but Mexican immigrants don't seem to get educated in the second generation at the same rate as whites. Education is desired and respected in the parts of Asia with a Confucian heritage; it is more socially acceptable than wealth (but that never stopped anyone from getting rich!).

      This makes me think that US will have some success in Iraq (even without forcing a western culture down their throats), but that Afghanistan probably won't work.

      I think you're making sense here, sort of: there certainly isn't anything in Afganistan's culture to give us hope that they are civilizable. Still, they did fairly well under their last king.

      You're assuming that a country can be rebuilt without ``forcing a western culture down their throats'', and I'm not sure that I can make any sense out of that idea at all. Certainly in Japan we had to force a wester culture down there throats. The Japanese had been eagerly adopting Western culture for many years by the end of WWII, so it wasn't an impossible task. Insofar as Japan is modern/ democratic/ progressive/ put-your-happy-buzzword-here, today, it is because they have adopted (and sometimes adapted) Western culture. No other culture allows change, social mobility, cooperation by large, anonymous groups, trusting strangers, tolerance of differences, and so on.

      Of course my conclusion (unscientific as I admit it is in its current form) has implications for the future success of the US. Are those tax cuts being taken out of school budgets?

      We have panel data on US education. Over time in the US, we have seen that illiteracy rates tend to increase with increased spending, across the entire sample. For any given year, the correlation between educational spending and educational attainment is either zero or negative. New York spends hugely on its school system, but has little to show for it. Texas probably spends a lot less per capita than NY (I don't know), but I doubt that the average Texas public school grad is any less educated than the average NYC public school grad.

      Once we get past some minimum, threshold level, more spending on education doesn't help, and might hinder. The US is WAY past that minimum. Now all we need is for parents to be involved, set high standards for their children and their children's schools, and insist that children and schools live up to those expectations.

      Immigrant parents from (just for example; this is not a comprehensive list) Russia, most of Asia and the Carribean, seem to be willing to do that. Most American parents don't. Again, that's a cultural difference.

      This is why I said that the problem is cultural, not racial, in the grandparent post: any plan for solving this which begins by setting lower standards for anyone or any group dooms that group to failure.

    53. Re:Religion Question? by conteXXt · · Score: 1

      it is a weird thing.

      I always wondered why there was a deluge of Catholic kids every year appearing in Grade 11.

      Then I found out that the government funding (used to ) cut off at Grade 10.

      And they get all the loose girls too...

      --
      The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
    54. Re:Religion Question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Bastard, information about my privy is private!

    55. Re:Religion Question? by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Of course the atheist answer would be that even the definition of religion is loaded because a relationship with a higher power assumes the exisytance of a higher power, and since there is no higher power, religion by that definition is impossible.

      So there is no religion, and any claims of having a religion are like claims of being napoleon... nothing more than delusional fantasy.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    56. Re:Religion Question? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      That assumes that this is possible, which is just as much an assumption (i.e. an unproven statement, scientifically speaking, and probably unprovable) as my belief that one exists.

      But are we talking about belief, or what is actually true? I read your definition of religion to be about how one viewed one's relationship, or what one believed one's relationship with a higher power to be - in which case, an atheist has no such relationship.

      If you're saying that it's what the relationship really is, then I find this to be a strange definition of religion. In particular, what you say about it being an assumption that there is no relationship applies to anyone - how can anyone, be they Christians, Sikhs, Pagans, or some completely different religion, show that what they believe about their relationship with "the higher power" is correct?

    57. Re:Religion Question? by ojQj · · Score: 1
      I think you failed to understand that I was picking Vietnamese out as an exception to the general Asian rule. As a rule, Vietnamese immigrate to the US because of political/economic problems. As such the Vietnamese who immigrate are not necessarily wealthy or well-educated. The Chinese, Japanese, and Indians who immigrate to the US are often the cream of the crop in the countries they are immigrating from. They are immigrating despite the fact that they are well-off where they are, because they think they can do even better in the US.

      I found an excellent article on this subject in the Berkeley McNair Journal, that also goes some way towards explaining the "Asian gang" problem in California that I learned about from a friend at Rice: Re-examining the Model Minority Myth: A Look at Southeast Asian Youth

      Nonetheless, we may both be being too simplistic. Check out this article: Different Factors Affect the Academic Achievement of Asian and Latino Immigrant and Second-Generation Students

      One thing that bothered me about your post though, is your obvious belief in the superiority of Western culture. You do realize that Arab culture and science and Western culture and science have had complex interactions over the centuries, and that Western culture and science would not be where they are today without that interaction. In talking to Turkish and Japanese friends here in Germany, I've come to the conclusion that at least Turkish culture is significantly more similar to my own, than is Japanese culture. And a female Japanese friend of mine made it very clear that there is still very serious gender-based and class-based discrimination in Japan today. As a society, they have been successful anyways. Japanese aren't eagerly adopting Western culture. They are to some extent eagerly adopting Western fashions, and learning English, but that is the extent of it. The English is for business, and fashion has never been rational, much less constant.

      Anyways, a few books that I would suggest, if you're interested in the relation between Western culture and the rest of the world are Jared Diamond's Guns Germs and Steel, and John L. Esposito's The Islamic Threat: Myth or Reality (published before the 11 of September, and only becoming more relevant). Before reading these books, I also read William P. Alston's Perceiving God, the ideas in which are very related, but don't actually touch on the culture question.

      I'll just leave the education question alone, as it was only tangential to my original point. Suffice it to say I don't agree, but maybe we can pick up that discussion some other time.

    58. Re:Religion Question? by dejaffa · · Score: 1

      I read your definition of religion to be about how one viewed one's relationship, or what one believed one's relationship with a higher power to be

      Which is really what I meant -- I guess I expressed myself poorly. I apologize.

      - in which case, an atheist has no such relationship.

      Or an athiest believes that he has no relationship. I would say that an athiest not believing in God does not stop God in any way from believing in him.

      (Picture here, Dr. Teeth and the Electric Meyhem) "Even Santa Claus believes in you..."

      If you're saying that it's what the relationship really is, then I find this to be a strange definition of religion.

      That would imply that it is entirely possible for an individual to have any relationship with God that he/she likes, regardless of God's actual nature. I'm not entirely comfortable saying that.

      In particular, what you say about it being an assumption that there is no relationship applies to anyone - how can anyone, be they Christians, Sikhs, Pagans, or some completely different religion, show that what they believe about their relationship with "the higher power" is correct?

      I don't believe that it is scientifically possible -- that's one of the limitations of our understanding.

      I believe that if the Divine (God/the Higher Power/Elvis/whatever -- I'm using "God" as shorthand above) is entirely within our comprehension, it's not the real Divine -- the whole point of the Divine/human split is that we're limited. Hence, we're all the blind men with the elephant here. Does that make any more sense, or am I arguing in circles?

      --
      There is no 'i' in team, but there is in fiasco...
  13. Originated in NZ then UK by MrOrn · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually the Jedi answer for the census form started in New Zealand, then spread to the UK around April 2001. Australia's census wasn't until October.



    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/new_med ia /1271380.stm

    1. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by Gurp · · Score: 1

      The results from New Zealand have been published, but the Dept of Statistics have not officially stated how many wrote in "Jedi". They did discourage the populace from doing this, stating that it's a crime to lie on a census form.

      Results were as follows:=
      Other specified: 273,735
      Other response including no religion: 1,338,384
      So it seems there are very few Jedi in NZ.
      By comparison, there were ~160,000 "other specified"s ten years earlier.

    2. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      Semi-Dupe

      I knew I'd seen something like this before. Weird how Taco didn't seem to remember posting this only 9 months ago. Next thing you know he'll be forgetting what he posted an hour ago. Oh wait...

      Note: I realize Slashdot's been pretty good about dupes recently, but it's not as funny that way.

    3. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by schmink182 · · Score: 1

      Whoops, it's a full dupe. Didn't look far enough down the search page. This one wasn't Taco though (and I didn't remember it). But still, news from 2 years ago should probably be checked for dupe-age.

    4. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by Lenbok · · Score: 1
      A friend of mine got the exact NZ numbers back.

      See this comment

    5. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by sTavvy · · Score: 1

      Actually in New Zealand, it wasn't jedi, it was Sheep.

    6. Re:Originated in NZ then UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that's the sexual preference field, not the religion one... :)

      (you can probably guess where I'm from using just that comment. Every country has some other country pegged as the sheep-shaggers...)

  14. Originated in Australia? by nzlettuce · · Score: 1

    The Jedi religion actually originated in New Zealand, but as with everything that is New Zealand, the Australians stole it.

    1. Re:Originated in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont you mean as with everything else in New Zealand it emigrated to Australia!! :P

    2. Re:Originated in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      but as with everything that is New Zealand, the Australians stole it

      but at least it makes a change from the Americans

    3. Re:Originated in Australia? by silne · · Score: 1

      Including the population.

      What's the percentage now? I believe it was something like 30% of Australians hold New Zealand citizenship (of course I could just be confused, but I doubt it.)

      In my section at work, 2 out of 5 employees are Kiwis. Of course in my household, 1 out of 2 residents are Kiwi-born (my fiance is a Kiwi. I don't hold it against him ;-))

    4. Re:Originated in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they allow gay marriage down under?

    5. Re:Originated in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Then who stole Zealand from Old Zealand?

    6. Re:Originated in Australia? by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Then who stole Zealand from Old Zealand?

      Some dutch navigator or cartographer who named New Zealand (Nieuw Zeeland, whatever).
      The natives call it Aotearoa.

      As a Jedi myself (I'm one of the 1.5% of kiwis who put "Jedi" on the census) I prefer the name Aotearoa 'coz it sounds kinda cool. It seems outdated being named after a dutch province.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
    7. Re:Originated in Australia? by Darth+Coder · · Score: 1

      The natives call it Aotearoa.

      Thank you - that verse from 'Six Months in a Leaky Boat' finally makes sense now :-)

      --
      The ability to monopolize a planet is insignificant next to the power of the source.
    8. Re:Originated in Australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that logic, you'll have no worries about anyone stealing your sheep jokes. You can keep those

    9. Re:Originated in Australia? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      Some dutch navigator or cartographer who named New Zealand That would be Abel Tasman, who has a rough sea and a crazy island named after him.

      BTW Aotearoa means land of the long white cloud.

    10. Re:Originated in Australia? by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      Not to mention a voraciously hungry yet oddly dumb creature that is always chasing rabbits, ducks, and Elmer Fudd in a whirlwind of arms and legs.

    11. Re:Originated in Australia? by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Og course, you know that in the U.K., we call it "New Zedland"

      Rich

    12. Re:Originated in Australia? by yuri+benjamin · · Score: 1

      That would be Abel Tasman
      I've heard 2 accounts:
      1) It was a member of Tasman's crew that named Nieuw Zeeland.
      2) It was a cartographer/registrar back in the Netherlands who changed the name to Nieuw Zeeland, after Tasman and crew named it someting else.

      Both accounts could be spurious.
      To keep it on topic: I've heard there was a sith concealed among Tasman's crew.

      --
      You make the mistake of thinking you can educate the fundamental stupidity out of people. You can't.
  15. Hairy Palms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonono, you got it all wrong. That's not Jedi, that's WOOKIES!

  16. Use the Force eh? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 5, Funny

    The force will be with you, always, you hoser!

    1. Re:Use the Force eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come over to the dark side, ya knob!

    2. Re:Use the Force eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get out, eh?

  17. Statistically significant? by etcshadow · · Score: 1

    What's the null hypothsesis?

    --
    :Wq
    Not an editor command: Wq
    1. Re:Statistically significant? by AnhZone · · Score: 1

      The poster probably meant statistically different from zero, but this is not a random sample! This is the whole population. There is exactly 20 some thousand self-proclaimed Jedi worshippers out of 31 million Canadians, which is definitely not zero.

      --
      Patriotism is the conviction that your country is superior to all others because you were born there. (GBS)
    2. Re:Statistically significant? by etcshadow · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe I was being sarcastic. Well... sarcastically significant...

      --
      :Wq
      Not an editor command: Wq
  18. OSQ by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Homer: "Marge, anyone could miss Canada. All tucked away down there."

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:OSQ by echucker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another Simpsons classic...

      Gordie - "I moved here from Canada, and they think I'm slow, eh."

    2. Re:OSQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh! Hahaha! A Simpsons's quote! I get it! Hahaha! Huzzah! That one's funny! Hahaha! I sure do get it!

  19. Whos to say they arent jedi? by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is the Gvt of canada now deciding the name one can use to descrbe ones religion? I'm a discordian. It is the best description, and closest philospy that describes my worldview. Are they going to give me a hard time because thats not an approved/accepatable religion?

    To put it bluntly, fuck off. You left that part of the form as fill in the blank. If you dont like my answer, maybe you shouldnt be asking the question.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by silicon1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, It's not like religion is something that is tangible, it's a construct of the mind in the beliefs, but on the other hand other religions have bibles that tell them the information of which to follow that relgion, what would the jedi use as their bible? Starwars movies?

    2. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your insignificant in the grand scheme of things... and should go fuck yourself.

    3. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by MxTxL · · Score: 1

      Sadly enough, in the world of star wars fan fiction and even in the approved novels that are it's only the movies that are considered true canon law in the world. And they are often referred to as 'the canon law' and as 'the bible'. All other works based in the stars wars world are basically stories... the only things that 'really' happened in the world are what are portrayed in the movies.

      And it's sad that i know that.

    4. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're likewise, insignificant in the grand scheme of things. You know what to do.

    5. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      No, they are not deciding the name. The census is not a definition of legal religions. They are just not reporting it in the actual statistics for the country because they see it as UNIMPORTANT.

      Who is giving you a hard time? Has a single one of the Canuck Jedi been harassed in any way because of the census? NO, because census data is for statistical purposes only, not personal targetting. Nobody cares about this, except the meida.

      Who is complaining? Seems the media is making more noise than stats canada is. They just ignored it, cause it's not part of what they want to know. They don't give a fuck about your individual beliefs, they want to know the big numbers. If a million people put Jedi, they might mention it.

    6. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that depends. Does discordian stand for dipshit, or is the correlation purely a coincidence in your case?

    7. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not! We will have to wait until four hundred years AFTER the last of the vhs tapes, dvds, and books are lost, only THEN we can have some people make it up. That is how it worked for the new testament and the Buddha's discords right? Posting AC since theist mod's are pricks. Cheers all!

    8. Re:Whos to say they arent jedi? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      That's because the goverment in Canada knows better then you! You should know that, our elected dictator does his best to down play, and push things as he sees fit.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  20. And if IIRC, by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 4, Funny
    the number of "Jedi Worshippers" in Australia dropped dramatically in a census taken after Episode Two came out.

    Nothing like a sucky sequel to weed out the unbelievers.

    All of a sudden, I have this vision of a bunch of Christians in ancient Corinth, huddled around the latest of Paul's writings. "Wait, this sucks so much compared to his first letter! That's it, I'm leaving!"

    ;-)

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:And if IIRC, by silne · · Score: 1

      Actually, the number of people writing Jedi on their census dropped because it's illegal to make a false statement on the census. Jedi is NOT a registered religion and the government was threatening to fine people who wrote it on the census form. Not that I would have anyway. IIRC, it was an optional question.

    2. Re:And if IIRC, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> the number of "Jedi Worshippers" in Australia dropped dramatically in a census taken after Episode Two came out. Nothing like a sucky sequel to weed out the unbelievers.

      Same ditto with the New Testament.

    3. Re:And if IIRC, by mark-t · · Score: 1
      ... it's illegal to make a false statement on the census. Jedi is NOT a registered religion ...
      So this effectively makes it illegal for new misleading religions to start up. Wow... where were laws like this back when we needed them?
    4. Re:And if IIRC, by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Come Jesus! Entertain us!! Your last Miracle was way better!! There were way more Special effects and what not... Should call up Stan Winston or ILM for your next one :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    5. Re:And if IIRC, by workingstiff · · Score: 1

      Nothing like a sucky sequel to weed out the unbelievers.

      So, Episode I kept people praising Yoda?

    6. Re:And if IIRC, by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Nothing like a sucky sequel to weed out the unbelievers.

      Ah, so it's a bit like the fundamentalist stance on dinosaurs --->

      "Got put fossils on the Earth to test our faith"

  21. BLACK POWER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Claim: Marking 'Jedi' as your religion on census forms will force your government to grant it official status.

    Status: False.

    Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2001]

    As some of you may know there is a census coming around on August the 7th. For those who don't know, a census is where the government collates general information about it's residents (number of people living in your house, religion, etc) If there are enough people in Australia, who put down a religion that isn't mentioned on the census form it becomes a fully recognised and legal religion. It usually takes about 10,000 people to nominate the same religion.

    It is for this reason that it has been suggested that anyone who does not have a dominant religion to put "Jedi" as their religion.

    Send this on to all your friends and tell them to put down "Jedi" on their census form.

    And remember . . . If you are a member of the Jedi religion then you are by default a 'Jedi Knight'.

    So If this has been your dream since you were 4 years old . . . Do it cos you love Star Wars, If not . . . then just do it to annoy people.

    "May the Force be with you!"

    Origins: The 7 August 2001 Australia and 29 April 2001 United Kingdom censuses have afforded pranksters an opportunity to wreak a little mayhem by messing with the official results. E-mailed incitements to list "Jedi" as one's personal religion began appearing in inboxes in March 2001 with the incentive to do so offered as the living out of one's childhood dream of fighting for interstellar justice, light saber in hand.

    Truth is, marking down "Jedi" isn't going to change a thing, least of all what officially gets considered a religion. It is not up to the Office of National Statistics to decide such a question. They may be an arm of the government, but it doesn't fall within their province to confer official status (whatever that might be) on a religion any more than it would be up to the Boy Scouts to designate New York City a national wildlife preserve.

    The situation for hopeful Jedis in Australia is even more forbidding than it is in the U.K. Not only won't marking "Jedi" in the appropriate box gain official recognition for a non-existent religion, but the head of the Australian Bureau of Statistics census program, John Struik, has stated that anyone who falsely provides information on a census faces a $1,000 fine.

    Mr. Struik said that a putative religion must demonstrate a formal organizational structure and a belief system to be recognized. "If we get 10,000 Jedis, they will go down as no official religion," he said. They might lose a thousand bucks each as well.

    New Zealand weathered a similar Jedi incitement during its 6 March 2001 census. In an e-mail reportedly sent to thousands, Star Wars buffs encouraged New Zealanders to declare their religion as "Jedi", claiming if 8,000 did so it would be officially recognized, along with the others listed: Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Moslem, and Jewish. Once again, wishful thinking met up with cold reality: According to New Zealand census office representative Elizabeth Clements, there is no magic number that will put any religion on the list for official recognition.

    So why are people so hot to participate in such a scheme? On the plus side, there's the fleeting joy of tweaking bureaucracy's nose and the possibility of momentarily revisiting childhood fantasies about saving the galaxy from the evil Darth Vader. The other side of the ledger, however, is considerable:

    The premise of the call to arms is flawed; there is no official status to be gained. That part was purely the invention of the prankster who wrote the original letter.

    Even if there were official status to be gained, none of these governments would be swayed by a number of yahoos writing "Jedi" into a blank space on their census forms. They'd want to see tangible proof of an organized and thriving religion before they handed out the brass ring.

    At least in Australia, tho

  22. Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking of Jedis...

    1. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of your mom...

    2. Re:Star Wars by silicon1 · · Score: 1

      and ALSO speaking of jedis
      http://www.tbaytel.net/scaryf/temp/TheLastHope.wmv

  23. Of course we use the force. by csguy314 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do you think we're so damn good at hockey?

    --
    This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    1. Re:Of course we use the force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm, maybe cause' its all ya gots http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2002-05-02/news_f eature.php

    2. Re:Of course we use the force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Canada doesn't have any black people (congrat on that, BTW), hockey is the only sport you guys can be competitive at.

    3. Re:Of course we use the force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The winning goal for Canada at the world hockey championship was scored by Toronto's own Anson Carter, a black man.
      Oh, and you're also a racist asshole.... asshole.

    4. Re:Of course we use the force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya to bad, Basketball and both versions of football had been invented by a Canadian, but that's right you have Baseball the game you took from some girls in the UK...

    5. Re:Of course we use the force. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because there isn't anything else to do?

    6. Re:Of course we use the force. by anaticula · · Score: 1

      So _that_ is what caused sudden death...

    7. Re:Of course we use the force. by corbettw · · Score: 1

      "Why do you think we're so damn good at hockey?"

      I thought it was because you were a nation of really mean drunks? ;)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    8. Re:Of course we use the force. by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Well, coward, just to correct things, there are plenty of africanadians, especially in places where they came to get away from slavers like you.

      We'll whup yer asses at lacrosse or rugby anytime, wimp. You think hockey's rough?

      And, just to be on-topic, I know a couple of descendents of runaway slaves who are proud Canadian Jedi-Christians, too!

  24. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by anagama · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell - people believe in a lot of religions. At least this one has special effects you can actually see ... something other religions fail at miserably. I mean it's all fiction, might as well pick one that comes with a movie.

    If I was gonna pick though, I'd want something Romulan. Romulan chicks are hot!

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  25. Canadian Theme Song by TheSam · · Score: 1

    They should change Canada's national anthem to the Imperial March. The damned Jedi's would leave then!

  26. Revenge by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    Yeah... but it'd be nice for a change to see a census-taker eat someone else's liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

  27. Best sig I've seen in a while... by Analog+Assailant · · Score: 1

    n/t

  28. Census whoziits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean "...get your head out'j your ass next time you get near a keyboard!"

  29. Obvious...? by DirtyJ · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the report: Prior to 1971, fewer than 1% of the Canadian population reported having no religion. In 2001, that percentage increased to 16% of the population.

    I find their lack of faith disturbing.

    [ducks]

    1. Re:Obvious...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being Canadian, I have no doubt that only old, old people go to the old, old stone cathedrals here in toronto. Young people have become very materialistic, as in most 'modern' culture.

    2. Re:Obvious...? by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      And they are still less violent than the religous citizens of the United States. In Japan, a very peaceful, slightly odd but traditionally moral country somewhere around 50% of the citizens are not religous and their murder rate and violent crime rates are less than Canada's .
      So if violent crime (moral convictions) are better in places with less religion perhaps religion isn't related to morality as much as people say it is. And I assume that is why you are disturbed about a lack of faith. Society is operating hundreds of times better (in terms of murders and violent crime). I don't assert that religion causes bad morality, please note, I'm just saying it's society and not religion. So don't get depressed at the lack of faith and wonder how non-religous people can be moral. Or why they are. They simply decided science and fact was more convincing than fable and myth.

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
    3. Re:Obvious...? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Lack of Religion != Materialistic.

      Sure, culture has turned very materialistic, but one hell of alot of religious people sure have some nice cars, clothes, house(s), etc...

      It's just that the older folks came from an era where you went to church to save your place in heaven.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  30. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is it different from any other religion? If it weren't for people telling people what to believe in, I can't imagine in the long run many people would have even remotely similar faiths. I'm plenty of people who have "deep relationships" with Jesus wouldn't have even met the guy if the general public didn't glorify his supposed holiness.

  31. Jedi, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Can you imagine 20,000 Canadians playing with their light sabres.... erh... no, not that sabre...

  32. What does this show? by spRed · · Score: 1

    What this shows is what any mandatory [web] survey shows...

    People will fill out a form if you make them fill out a form. If you want actual demographic info with some relation to reality it must be a voluntary form. [and even then there is a self-selection bias, but at least you drop the folks who say they were born in 1804].

    --
    .sig Karma out the wazoo, better to spend points elsewhere if this is above 2 or below 0
  33. Too much time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "While it show that some people may have too much time on their hands..."

    Why? Putting Jedi in the blank would be easier than writing other non-four-letter religions... =)

  34. Undermined by Lucas by debrain · · Score: 1

    Sometimes I wonder if the Star Wars franchise was intentionally undermined by George Lucas as a way to responsibly curtail the religion that it could never become, in his eyes. The latest two Star Wars movies are by no means the epic they came from, IMHO. Not having released those movies would have just as equally preserved the environment in which this faith is fostered. Only by releasing shoddy Hollywood knockoffs could he effect this sort of disdain.

    Being the creator, I am sure that Mr. Lucas would have a very different perspective of the whole franchise than the fans, and I wonder what his view of the most fanatical fans are. I suspect his interpretation is not far from Alec Guinness'.

    1. Re:Undermined by Lucas by Narcissus · · Score: 1

      I assume you're referring to the apparent lacklustre movies, right? If so, I have a different theory about them. Right from the outset let me say that the only Star Wars movie I've ever seen is Episode I.

      After coming out of the movie, I was pretty disappointed, and the main reason was that it wasn't really a complete movie. He knew he was going to make Episodes II and III, and so the end of Episode I was not complete, as he has the luxury of spreading the whole story over three episodes (LotR suffers the same problem, but logistically this may be a bit harder to fix).

      When he made his first Star Wars movie he didn't know that he'd be able to make the next two, right? Yeah, I know he may have had the vision of three films, but he could not be certain that he would be able to make them (who'd fund them if the first was a flop?). Therefore, the story he presented had to be at least a bit self contained. In reality, he needed it to be a good story without trailing off, as he needed the good reviews etc. to be able to ensure the rest of the story could be told. Hence, the first movie was "complete".

      Unfortunately (well, from my point of view, anyway), Episode I had such a weird feel to the end, that I didn't even feel the desire to see the rest...

    2. Re:Undermined by Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that the first three movies were of epic calibre, particularly in comparison. I know many people who have seen only Episode I and walked away wondering what was so special about Star Wars.

  35. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    heh, fat tards with sticks

  36. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! +5 Funny.

    The fact that this has been modded as "Flamebait" indicates that the truth must be VERY painful indeed. You people, I swear.

  37. And so what? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the UK, some 390,000 individuals are followers of the force But as the original Canada.com article notes, the Jedi religion choce may have been a protest agains the government surveying religious preference.

    1. re: And so what? by akamoe · · Score: 1

      I put subgenius. Wonder how many said that?

      -- R

    2. Re:And so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did my census over the phone. When asked about my religion, I let the census taker know that I found the question fairly offensive. When it was insisted that I give an answer, I chose Musician. "But it has to be a religion you currently practice," I was told. "It is - I practice every day for 2 hours."

  38. Lucky Candadians by BladeMelbourne · · Score: 1

    The Australian government caught wind of the people's desire to put Jedi down on the 2001 census, and forbid us from doing so.

    I would have put down Jedi, but it might not have made that much of a difference with Australia's population of 18 million.

    1. Re:Lucky Candadians by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      I put Jedi down on the 2001 census in Australia.

      Now I live back home in Canada.

      Damn Aussies!

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    2. Re:Lucky Candadians by Narcissus · · Score: 1

      They didn't really forbid us from doing it. It's illegal to list an unregistered religion: end of discussion. It's not like they made a special rule for supposed Jedis, is it?

      You make it sound conspiratorial, when in fact it's a law that's always been around. It's just that most people down here don't care too much about the "insignificant" laws until they stop you from having a little "fun".

    3. Re:Lucky Candadians by martinX · · Score: 1

      You can't actually "register" a religion in Australia. I think the census guys just wanted to scare people away from giving a bogus answer. Remember, answering the religion question is OPTIONAL.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    4. Re:Lucky Candadians by Narcissus · · Score: 1

      OK, so not "registered": maybe "officially recognised".

      Going off topic now was the fact that the email said that if enough people wrote it down, then the government had to recognise it as an official religion. Last time I looked, the Census had no control over government: sure maybe they'd think about it, but it's not a given that it would happen.

    5. Re:Lucky Candadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how the hell do you register no religion if you may only answer with a registered religion???

  39. But because its Canada.. by marcushnk · · Score: 5, Funny

    That would make them Sith, eh? :-P

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
    1. Re:But because its Canada.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha..that's funny. Well, if I knew what it meant.

      I guess someone in the U.S. viewing Canada as being evil is pretty fucking hilarious, given the whole unneccessary Gulf War sequel, George W. Bush's failure to recognize the Armenian genocide, the assassination of Marilyn Monroe, John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., the Vietnam war...

      Yeah, you're right. That -is- funny!

    2. Re:But because its Canada.. by marcushnk · · Score: 1

      You know whats funnier.. I'm australian :-)

      I made the joke because I too have seen South Park and because I've seen southpark I think I know enough aboot Yankee/Canadian relationships that I can make a sucessfull joke on the topic. ..oh yeah I nearly forgot... "Eh?" :-P

      --
      "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  40. Personal Privacy Aggregate Statistic by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Personal privacy isn't much of a problem with such broad statistics.
    There is no personal private information that is traceable to you.

    Now if it was possibly traceable, or gave a particular impression. (ie 90% of the 10 men in this room masturbate to anime porn) That could be a personal information, but when it is sufficiently vague as to who the data relates to it is a non issue.

    It isn't that this data should be unknown, it is that your data should not be known as yours.

  41. Maybe it shows something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Most governments have a habit of asking for information they have no good reason to have - even demanding it on pain of arrest.


    Maybe this just shows that people are tired of nosey, interfering government. Maybe it shows more people understand the value of privacy. Maybe this is one easy way to stick two fingers up and say 'f*ck off'.


    Governments are supposed to work for the people, to carry out there orders. Maybe all these Jedi can take as their first jihad the task of teaching governments to get back in their box.

  42. What angers me... by Davak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What angers me is that everybody assumes that these people do not actually Worship jedi!

    Articles and films already exist regarding this spiritual movement.

    Plus, we already admit that other such religions exist:

    - Star Trek - Leonard Nimoy Should Eat More Salsa Foundation

    - Hicks - Love thy Mullet

    - Plastic surgery - Cosmetics for the holy

    Anyway...

    Davak

  43. Well, there has to be one... by soul_cmd · · Score: 1

    that is not a virgin. She may have been drunk and ugly. The "Lucky" Jedi may not have been sure it was even a "she" and it was probably entirely by accident, but I bet there has to be one.

  44. lightsabre-wielding by Ironpoint · · Score: 1


    lightsabre-wielding is one of those phrases that became commonplace that shouldn't have.

    Its like hearing some little kid calling another kid a dork on nickelodeon even though it means dick.

    1. Re:lightsabre-wielding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least that's not as bad as "UKian" or "USian" as those retards over at K5 keep trying to make common place.

  45. Importance of religion by Luguber123 · · Score: 1
    While it show that some people may have too much time on their hands, it also raises questions of privacy rights, Internet activism and data integrity.

    This is so right! Billions people have the time and imagination to care about religion while they could spend time dealing with facts and fiction. Tho I don't really see how this Jedi religion raises any new questions. On the other hand I'm looking forward to see if they will manage to put up some kind of church in the same scale as most of the Star Wars universe, perhaps something like the death star.

  46. Dodgy reporting? by gwernol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So if as the article claims:

    "Statistics Canada didn't report the number of people who responded Jedi in tables listing response rates for other religions, saying that their analysis did not include the "media-driven'' response, in part because the sample was so small. However, statisticians did when asked produce tables showing a much smaller number of Rastafarians, Scientologists and Satanists."

    How do they know that 20,000 Canadians declared themselves to be Jedi? Could it be (gasp) just a number that the web site made up so it could write a story about the NZ and UK census returns?

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
    1. Re:Dodgy reporting? by sheldon · · Score: 0

      Blasphemer!

      Everything you read on the Internet is true!

    2. Re:Dodgy reporting? by gwernol · · Score: 1

      Blasphemer!

      Everything you read on the Internet is true!


      In which case, my assertion that the original report was dodgy must also be true.

      Now, if you'll excuse me I'm off to dissappear up my own contradiction.

      --
      Sailing over the event horizon
  47. why couldn't they just follow a normal religion? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    like Oprahism?

    Anyone remember the Star Trek religion on futurama? All the worshippers were killed by being tossed into volcanoes, the method most befitting virgins.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  48. 20k is statistically significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not everybody up here got the "detailed" questionaire that you could enter your religion in.

    which may be mentioned in the article, but it's kinda a rule that you can't read the article if you're gonna post. ;)

  49. Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the credit! by bad_fx · · Score: 2, Informative

    It actually "originated" in New Zealand, in the March 2001 census (cf August in Australia)... I remember cause I did it myself in the NZ census which was the first in the world dangit.

    Though I hear the actual email which started the whole thing may have come from the UK, not sure which.

    This is Russell Crowe all over again.. when he's winning oscars he's an Australian... but when he's getting totally pissed and trying (and failing) to beat the crap out of some guy he's a Kiwi... *Sigh*

    Regards,
    A disgruntled New Zealander

  50. Story by quantaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    A few years ago, BEFORE the Episode 1 came out, we named our soccer team "The Jedi". I played fullback and during one game I was having a particularly easy time thwarting the the opposing teams attempts to get by me. Finally one play I miscalculated and a player with the ball slipped by me and started to rush up the field, about 2 seconds after he got by he collapsed with a leg cramp and had to roll himself off the field. For the rest of the season my team was convinced I had used The Force :)

    --
    I stole this Sig
  51. A Time-Honored Tradition by ewhac · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I first read about this phenomonon, I thought it sounded familiar to something some prankster did many years ago. Now, in this Age of Google, I have found the original article.

    The article deals with the propogation of "memes" -- infectious ideas that take on a life of their own (e.g. "All your base..."). It discusses in particular how the author faced what he thought was a rather impudent question on his college admission form -- asking for his religion -- and, with his cheeky response, inadvertently started a meme. It also discusses how the meme was extinguished by the college administration.

    The religious meme thing is about one-third of the way down, but I recommend reading the whole article. It's a good read.

    Schwab

    1. Re:A Time-Honored Tradition by f97tosc · · Score: 1

      It also discusses how the meme was extinguished by the college administration.

      I wonder when the other religous memes will be extinguished... it will probably be a while though, since listening to and absorbing everything your parents say is one of the key characteristics that have made humans so successful.

      I hope soon, then we would not have to suffer through things like 9/11, or the terrors in Northern Ireland.

      Tor

    2. Re:A Time-Honored Tradition by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the evil you know may be better than the one you don't. True enough Religion causes much bad in the world but there is another side of its coin. Extrem religious fundamentalists have a counter weight that generally stops them from doing to much damage.

      If religious meme's die out I have little doubt we can find other reasons to kill each other over... the next one might not have any built in restraints IE Fascisim and Socialisim. Democracies growing vein of tolerance is hopefull but without religious(read moralistic) underpinings in its followers it is somewhat morally bereft and its in that abscence of morality that the crisis of lethal mass meme's tends to come to the fore.

      Religion's have killed a great many. But Nationalistic meme's have killed many more in modern times. Perhaps WMD's in the hands of fundamentalists can alter that.... but Korea does have them and there problem is religious fanatiasicim.

      Relegion has become a cold in a sense. It causes problems in human society but by and large it does more good than harm in the world. Nationalisim is what brought us the bomb and MAD.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    3. Re:A Time-Honored Tradition by harborpirate · · Score: 1

      I would agree with the majority of the parent post.

      Almost all religion memes include a provision against killing other humans. Only a small percentage of mutated religion memes encourage the killing of humans. Thus, the vast majority of religion memes are genetically benefical.

      The Islam meme is the obvious example. The vast majority of people who have accepted the Islam meme have a version which prohibits killing other humans. However, a small group are infected with a more sinister (in genetic terms) version which actually encourages the killing of humans who have other ascribe to other memes. I think it is critical for humanity to find out which other memes are causing the Islam meme to mutate into the Islamic Terrorist meme.

      I would argue that the problem in North Korea is an infection of a Communist meme mutated by a Totalitarianism meme. Neither of those is a religion meme, though anti-religion memes often accompany those memes. Luckily a powerful version of the Nationalism* and/or Isolationism meme does not seem to have infected the leadership at this time. As Hitler showed, however, it does not take long for powerful versions of such a memes to infect a very large number of people in a short time due to modern communications equipment.

      *Note that I am in this case calling the Nationalism meme a mutation of the Patriotism meme, which rather than merely encouraging pride in ones own country also includes a provision against other countries.

      I have only recently become aware of the "meme" meme, and would like to thank the author of the thread root post for making such an informative article available. I find it equally fascinating that deeper rooted memes that I am infected with immediately mutated the "meme" meme described in the article so that it would fit alongside the others I ascribe to. Certainly a unique experience to realize for the first time exactly what was happening.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
  52. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by MouseR · · Score: 1

    If I was gonna pick though, I'd want something Romulan. Romulan chicks are hot!

    I'd pick any starfleet ship counselor anytime. According to Ricker (both of them), they're easy to come by. Just raise an eyebrow and it's corresponding shoulder and do the jazzy walk...

  53. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

    Most other religions are old enough that (to paraphrase Bismark) we haven't had to see them made. The more recent religions are widely derided in large part because we have contemporary accounts of their genesis and the fact that their leaders were demonstrably cranks and frauds. Very old religions do not suffer from this impediment. However it is not impossible to have a deep personal relationship with an entity one does not have apriori knowledge of, just look at your friends.

  54. Call me a scruffy-looking, UNTAXED, nerf-hurter by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

    And I, as Lord High Potentiate of the Lightest Sabre, and a leader of The Worshipers of Jedi Known As Bob, claim all kinds of tax breaks for my self, my priestess, the church which happens to be my house, my dog (who is strong with the farts, er, make that the force), my car, my ...

    --
    The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
  55. Freedom of Religion? by uberkuba · · Score: 1

    Does a religion have to be aproved by your government for you to believe in it?
    Personally I want to see the return of greek gods and those cool pegan rituals. If people want to believe in Jedi that should be OK, I don't see how you can have freedom of religion, democracy etc if you ban some beliefs, even if they did originate from a series of stories... oh wait, the whole christ thing... where is the solid proof that we are not victims of a really ancient joke????

    1. Re:Freedom of Religion? by Liquid+Tip · · Score: 1

      That's the great part about Canada! No one cares what you believe in. We should start writing "Lamp Posts" next year.

      -You have seen the light!

  56. Re:Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the cred by silne · · Score: 1
    A disgruntled New Zealander

    Shouldn't that be:

    "Bloody whinging Kiwi" ? :-)

  57. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by anagama · · Score: 1

    Starship counselors are OK, but first season security officers who come back to life as romulans are WAY hotter! ;-)

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  58. Overall Religious stats are quite telling by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    16% of Canadians have "no religion", from 12% in the 1991 census. That's nearly 5 million people in a country of 30 million. Europe and the U.K. have similar makeups. B.C. leads Canada in the "no religion" category at 35% and it is also the largest religious group in the Province.

    Also quite interesting was the shift from mainstream Protestantism to groups such as "born again" and "evangelical christian" (121% increase)and perhaps "no religion" (43% increase) or the eastern religions (roughly 85% increase). Not sure if that indicates an ideological shift or one of identity with respect to "christian". Certainly the rise in Muslin, Sikh, etc. practice can be traced to immigration, Canada has experienced enourmous diversity since the 1991 census.

    I tried to find similar information on the U.S. Census website, but was unable.

    Now, we get to the bottom of a comment where Slashdotters rarely spend time. This is where the real meat and potatoes of many comments are made. Not is this case. I am taking this space to talk of my collection of women's undergarments. Why was this not included on the census form? Surely there are large numbers of lingerie collecting atheist computer geeks out there, how could this be overlooked?

    1. Re:Overall Religious stats are quite telling by Repton · · Score: 1

      Hmm... Number of non-religious in NZ was 26% in the 2001 census (with a further 5% who didn't give an answer).

      The census results (available online from stats.govt.nz) also give 64,000 (1.5%) listed as "Response outside scope" --- this could include the Jedi vote, I guess. "Jedi" isn't in the official results.

      Two other interesting things... Firstly, there were over 100,000 more responses than there were people in the country (apparently). And secondly, at the bottom of the spreadsheet of results is this comment: "All cells in this table have been randomly rounded to base 3." ??? Can someone explain that?

      --
      Repton.
      They say that only an experienced wizard can do the tengu shuffle.
    2. Re:Overall Religious stats are quite telling by etyam · · Score: 1

      The percentage 'no religion' in the Netherlands is over 50% by now. It all makes for a much healthier society.

    3. Re:Overall Religious stats are quite telling by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Amazing, 3 resposnes and not one picked up that last tid bit you just left hanging out there..... sheeesh. Sometimes I despair the species.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  59. Crowe has it bad? What about Mel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Mel Gibson is kicking butt artistically; he's Australian, but when he's making ho-humm action films; he's described as a Statesider (American) from Peekskill, NY, USA.

  60. Why the h8? by ehiris · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I mean really, I thought that Star Wars Episode II was very good. The only problem was Jar Jar appeared for a little but at least he was calmed down quick.
    The weapons were cool, the clone factory was cool, the fights were cool so why all the h8?

    1. Re:Why the h8? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      It was cool mixed with cheeze-whiz...

      Lucas replaced the annoying Jar Jar sequences with annoying C3PO-switched-heads-with-battle-robot, and he was emphasized way too much.

      Dumb car racing through the city of Corscucant with aliens saying "Jedi do-do!", and "What the-".

      Cheeeesy love sequences.

      Another bad actor playing Anakin... are the Skywalker men doomed to be played by bad actors?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Why the h8? by Zarquon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I wouldn't classify James Earl Jones/David Prowse with Mark Hamill, Jake Lloyd, and Hayden Christensen..

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    3. Re:Why the h8? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Good point, I only meant the Skywalkers that go by the last name of Skywalker :)

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    4. Re:Why the h8? by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
      Cool?

      The whole time that chase through the robot factory was onscreen, I kept thinking "Didn't I see this in Mario Brothers before?"

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    5. Re:Why the h8? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      What amused me most was Spielberg's response to Lucas.

      At one point, in that factory chase scene, Anakin gets his hand 'caught' in a press. Now, apart from the fact that his hand should be flat and all the other pieces to get stuck in that press came out flat [ie minus convinient the arm shape], Anakin (and Lucas) was screwing around there...a bad little section in that action sequence which really doesn't play well on screen.

      But what was so funny was when Spielberg came out with Minority Report, kinda the same thing happens (I believe when the guy gets built into the car)...but Tom Cruise just pulls his arm out of the pressed metal part [which this time actually conforms to a 'real' object] :)

      I really thing Spielberg put that in there just to say to Lucas: "/this/ is how you should've handled that!" ;)

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    6. Re:Why the h8? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The "romance" scenes were absolutely painful to watch. No amount of special effects can make up for such horrendous dialogue.

  61. It's traceable by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    In Canada, the census is taken by locally appointed representatives from the community... that's right, your neighbour will see the original form with every personal detail on it... like your individual incomes, religion, and other personal information.

    When my house was selected, the woman collecting the forms lived all of 100 ft away. Privacy my ass. Oh, and you are required by law to fill out the form. You can't abstain.

    1. Re:It's traceable by Liquid+Tip · · Score: 1

      What part of Canada do you live in? The Census has always come in an envelope.

  62. Words of Wisdome to Canadian Jedi by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do or do not, eh.

    1. Re:Words of Wisdome to Canadian Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You didn't even spell "Wisdom" correctly, you hoser!

    2. Re:Words of Wisdome to Canadian Jedi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoser.

    3. Re:Words of Wisdome to Canadian Jedi by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean "wisdom". I meant "Wisdome". Yoda's half brother (he's part Wookie) Wisdome is a Jedi Master up there at the Elsinore Brewery.

  63. Hmmm...Interesting Parallels... by ScottKin · · Score: 1

    Religion started by the creation of a SciFi writer/creator.

    Canadian Jedi's

    Scientology

    hmmmm....

    ScottKin

    --
    I don't give a rat's behind about "karma" here or anywhere else. Don't like what I have to say here? Deal with it!
  64. Depends on your point of view. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    If it were *just* about people's inner beliefs, about pure spirtuality/religion, nobody would care.
    However, religion is a powerful social force, and defines groups of people who stick together, help each other, in business, vote as a block sometimes, etc. IT's a way of breaking down society that enough peopl throughout history see as defining enough to start WARS over.

    So the philosophical rhetoric aside, knowing how many catholics, muslims, protestants, etc. is more than summing up someon'es belief. You can't tell me everyoen who put "catholic" down believes every word the catholic church told them, and therefore, falls into the exact same spiritual beliefs.. it just means "yeah I consider myself a catholic"

  65. Here's my take... by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some, maybe alot, are sincere. The rest put "Jedi" because there's no checkmark for "bugger off".

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    1. Re:Here's my take... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Giving a serious response to a joke, for everyone saying that a Jedi religion should be started, you've missed the point. The point of answering Jedi is to say "bugger off", not to start a religion. Most of the faithful in NZ, UK, AU, and CA who answered Jedi would not have needed to do so if "None of your business" was an option.

  66. 31 million? by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

    Only 31 Million? Hell we (Michigan) can take em :D

    Of course since we have a Canadian governor, I wonder if we won't be going the other way...

    1. Re:31 million? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last time you folks tried to invade Canada (1812) we got all pissed off, marched to DC and burnt down the White House (which is so called because the day after the smoking timbers were painted with white-wash). So, maybe Michigan will want to bring Ohio and NY State along too...

  67. Not really by siskbc · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    How else can you explain all the Americans who can't figgure out where the heck Canada is! And yes I'm Canadian :)

    It's actually because we don't fucking care. On our maps Canada is usually listed as "Southeast Alaska."

    Aw, don't cry, I'm just kidding. One of my best friends is a dirty Canuck. Eh?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 million dollars per SECOND of trade between our nations, the largest you have with any other nations. That's why you should care :-)

  68. Dont forget the home of all Jedi Knowledge by Jontu_Kontar · · Score: 1
    Jediism.org

    The text of the first page...

    Jediism is not the same as that which is portrayed within the Star Wars Saga by George Lucas and Lucasfilm LTD. George Lucas' Jedi(TM) are fictional characters that exist within a literary and cinematic universe. The Jedi(TM) discussed within this website refer to factual people within this world that live or lived their lives according to Jediism, of which we recognize and work together as a community to both cultivate and celebrate. Jedi(TM) Apprentices, Knights, Commanders, Scholars, Masters, Scribes and High Councilors embrace Jediism as a real living, breathing religion, and sincerely strive to seek out and emulate real life examples of Jediism in the long rich history of mankind. Jediism bases less of its focus on myth and fiction, and more upon those real life examples of Jediism.

    The history of the path of Jediism traverses thought which is well over 5,000 years old. It shares many themes embraced in Hinduism, Confucionism, Buddhism, Gnosticism, Stoicism, Catholicism, Taoism, Shinto, Modern Mysticism, the Way of the Shaolin Monks, the Knight's Code of Chivalry and the Samurai Warriors. We recognize that many times the answers to mankind's problems comes from within the purified hearts of genuine seekers of truth. Theology, philosophy and religious doctrine can facilitate this process, but we believe that it would be a futile exercise for any belief system to claim to hold all the answers to all the serious questions posed to seekers of truth in the 21st century. Jediism may help facilitate this process, yet we also acknowledge that it is up to the true believer who applies the universal truths inherent within Jediism to find the answers they seek.

    Anyway, check it out for yourself.

  69. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by gailwynand · · Score: 1

    Yeah, man. I mean this almost sold me on Christianity! All that lamb's blood freaked me out, though.

    --
    A pilot, in those days, was the only unfettered and entirely independent human being that lived in the earth.-Mark Twain
  70. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it at all weird that I know who your talking about?

    Please tell me no, I still have hopes of getting laid, or even married some day.

  71. Re:why couldn't they just follow a normal religion by pherris · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Star Trek: The science fiction religion that doesn't take all your money."

    From the same episode of futurama.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  72. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Charlton Heston, as Moses in the 10 Commandments. That bit where he parts the red sea is pretty damn spetacular. Definatly on par with yoda i'd say.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  73. And what angers me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that there's people stupid enough to actually do it!

    Not to mention that there's also people stupid enough to feel the need to clarify they exist.

  74. Stand back; new religion coming through. by dstone · · Score: 1

    it's illegal to make a false statement on the census. Jedi is NOT a registered religion

    And it's never gonna be, with that attitude, Mister!

  75. Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I submitted this story 5 fucking hours ago. Congrats Slashdot editors, great consistency. Moderators are just as fucked lately, every goddamn comment I make gets modded down, regardless of what I say. Fuck this site.

  76. Re:Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the cred by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Jedi religion didn't come from New Zealand. It began a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  77. Re:Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the cred by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    Can you blame us? Have you tried distinguishing yourselves from Australia lately? Heck, it seems that there are more differences between Canucks and Yanks than between Aussies and Kiwis.

    Why don't you start with getting a new flag? Perhaps one that doesn't look like a carbon-copy of the Australian one?

  78. Re:horse cock by Horse+Cock · · Score: 1

    Did you ring?

  79. Jedi Meditation by LastCa_ · · Score: 1

    I release my past, negatives, human relations, and inner self into the Light.

    I am a Light being.

    I radiate the Light from my Light center throughout my being.

    I radiate the Light from my Light center to everyone.

    I radiate the Light from my Light center to everything.

    I am in a Bubble of Light, and only Light can come to me, and only Light can be here.

    I thank the Light for everyone, everything and for me.

    This is the Jedi meditation "motto". If larger religions where such peacefull, everything would be more peacefull.

    Jediism is talking about the Light.. most other "religions" and "stuff" are based on death... I prefer to put myself onto the light than onto the death.

    --
    - LastCall_
  80. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by anagama · · Score: 1

    Well, there is hope for you ... unless you know off the top of your head just which season it was in which she returned from the dead.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  81. It did originate in Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To those NZ sheep who think otherwise, the original emails came from Australia, it just happened that New Zealand and the UK had their census before Australia.

  82. Its a JOKE! (mostly) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most of the 20,000 jedi 'worshippers' you might happen to notice, reside in British Columbia. This is because a local morning show on the radio, Larry and Willy on CFOX, asked their listeners to fill out the jedi option on the census when it came around if they happened to get one of the extended forms.

    They thought at the time that if they got 10,000 people the government was legally obliged to recongize it as a real religion. Turns out its not true but this years results show the power of a pair of funny as hell radio hosts!

    1. Re:Its a JOKE! (mostly) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is the sort of oddball thing - this idea that some sort of Census "critical mass" suddenly converts a belief system into an "officially recognized religion."


      To most western governments, a religion is just a certain variety of non-profit organization. The Universal Life Church will legally ordain anyone, for example, and with a few papers filed you can, for example, perform weddings in the U.S.A. If I wanted to, I could start my own Christian church - get some followers, incorporate as a nonprofit, so forth. Anyone could start a church of Jedi (I doubt Lucas could or would sue on the basis of the name or philosophy alone if they did not utilize intellectual property from the films). But a whole lotta people would have to sign on for it to actually show up on the form.


      I'm sure all kinds of people write all kinds of nutty stuff in for their religion on the Census forms. Somewhere down the line a computer checks against a list of known religions, and chucks it into the other category if it doesn't show up.


      Actually starting a legal religion would be a lot more interesting than writing Jedi in on a census form.

  83. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

    Didn't you see the ten commandments. Great special effects.

  84. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the jello that's supposed to be the red sea.

  85. "May the Force....oh, nevermind!" by Beebos · · Score: 1

    I was ten when episode VI came out. The Jedi Knights and "The Force" were to me the most interesting part of "The Saga."

    If any spiritual belief system ever appealed to me it was "The Force". The idea that there is a Force that runs through all life and the universe itself is very attractive to me.

    However, when I found out in Episode One that "The Force" is a bunch of bugs in your blood... ...I knew then and there that there is no god!!!

  86. "Down There" might be accurate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if you live in Detroit. Go due south from there and the first foreign (from Detroit's perspective) country you hit is Canada.

  87. Statistics Canada by earthforce_1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I live in Canada, and it is a little known fact (even among Canadians) that failing to answer a Stats Can survey can net you a lengthy jail term. Don't believe me?

    From the statistics act: http://www.statcan.ca/english/about/statact.htm

    False or unlawful information

    31. Every person who, without lawful excuse,

    (a) refuses or neglects to answer, or wilfully answers falsely, any question requisite for obtaining any information sought in respect of the objects of this Act or pertinent thereto that has been asked of him by any person employed or deemed to be employed under this Act, or

    (b) refuses or neglects to furnish any information or to fill in to the best of his knowledge and belief any schedule or form that the person has been required to fill in, and to return the same when and as required of him pursuant to this Act, or knowingly gives false or misleading information or practises any other deception thereunder

    is, for every refusal or neglect, or false answer or deception, guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding five hundred dollars or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or to both. 1970-71-72, c. 15, s. 29.

    I think this was a subtle form of protest. You should see the stuff I told them the last time they chose me. My NYT mandatory registration lists me as a 13 year old lawyer from Afghanistan who makes USD $150,000 a year. Let's see what the marketing Noobs make of that one, LOL... And I resent the government doing this sort of thing even more. BTW, even though they don't identify individuals, localized statistical data is available right down to your postal code, which is a tax subsidized godsend to direct marketing agencies.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Statistics Canada by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 0

      While I agree that the idea of a "jail term" for not answering the census is a bit harsh, I think most Canadian realize that they will never likely be put in jail for not answering a census form (or for providing false information). The reason the jail term part is there is because all federal legislation, especially for summary offences (equivilent to a misdemeanor for our American cousins), require both a fine and a jail term. I've never heard of someone going to jail for not filling out the census form.

      I've also never heard of Stats Can or any other Federal Ministry of Department for that matter, sharing "localized statistical data" with any "direct marketing agencies". The majority of the clients my company serves in Ottawa are Federal Ministries, Agencies and Departments and I can tell you with great confidence that this does not happen. Hell, they hardly share such information amongst themselves, let alone with private industry or direct marketers.

      And as you stated, the information is anonymous. The reason they track down to the postal code is the reason they do statistics in the first place - so they can see where to properly allocate our tax dollars and programs. If you lie or fail to fill out the form, you just might screw yourself out of some benefits you are entitled to (an extra postal route, re-drawing of riding boundaries, more federal health care money etc).

      So as for the Jedi stuff, well I'd guess many people aren't really Jedi (although a sizable geeky minority might just be), but would identify themselves as such if you asked them on the street today. Why? Is it a protest against the Stats Can survey? I suspect that, given our recent history in Canada with the Christian Brothers or the Residential Schools, this shows a "protest" against mainstream religions. This same Stats Can survey shows 4.8 million (16%) Canadians have no religion, a 33% increaswe over a decade ago (12%) and way more than before 1971 (1%).

      Sounds to me that Canadians are loosing faith in religion more than in ther government.

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    2. Re:Statistics Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't screw ourselves out of tax dollars by listing ourselves as jedi. We do screw ourselves out of tax dollars by re-electing the same boobs, although sending them to Ottawa does help to remove them from our community. Claiming to be jedi is a protest against one of the most instrusive questions on the census, not a protest against organized religions. Despite the slogans on our currency, separating church and state is our national policy. Answering jedi on the census is a way to tell the government to keep out of that part of our lives, just like public policy and the Charter says they should. It's like lying on exit polls on election night to keep media reports from skewing voting in western time zones.

    3. Re:Statistics Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is compliance with The Privacy Act considered a lawful excuse?

  88. Exactly by hayden · · Score: 1

    There are no famous people from New Zealand. Once somebody starts doing something note worthy, they're instantly adopted by Australia.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:Exactly by jinushaun · · Score: 1

      Russell Crowe was born in NZ, but he moved to Oz as a child, so who knows...

  89. That's nothing by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Informative
  90. The force is weak with this one by hayden · · Score: 3, Funny
    20,000 on a population of 31 million? Pfft. Australia managed 70,000 on a population of 18 million. Which proves either:

    1. There's more freaky people with no life in Australia.
    2. Australians are more likely to take the piss out of something they think is stupid or pointless.

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    1. Re:The force is weak with this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention we were threatened with a $1000 fine for saying we were subscribing to the jedi religion .... imagine how big it wouldve been without the threat ;)

  91. Re:Overall Religious stats are quite misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that the actual number of non-religious Canadians is far higher than 16%. People tend to put down the religion of their forefathers, but that doesn't mean that they subscribe to it. The next census will be probably be more accurate, as people get used to admitting that they are agnostics. In my experience, the true number of agnostics is at least 50% and probably much higher.

  92. From a old SNL skit by trinity93 · · Score: 1

    Star Wars! Nothing but Star Wars! Nothing but Star Wars! All of the time!

    (To the tune of the Star Wars theme song)

    --
    We substituted the coffee Slashdot normally drinks with "Sandoz Crystals", Lets see if they notice the difference
  93. My Religion by Stonan · · Score: 1

    I live in Burnaby (a suburb of Vancouver, British Columbia). I think it's well known across North America that approx. 80% of the population of BC have tried pot at least once in their lives.

    I'm 32. I first tried pot when I was 8. (Everyone was talking about it but wouldn't tell me what it was so I looked it up in an encyclopedia & the reference books it listed. My research continued from there)

    At 14 I 'founded' the Loyal Order of Red-Eye Knights.
    We stand for Truth, Honour, and Courage (THC). Peace through the power of the Plant.
    Your rise in the order is governed by the following:

    First tried-4 years - beginner
    4-8 years - Apprentice
    8-16 years - Junior Knight
    16-32 years - Full Knight
    32 years and on - Member of the High Council

    (This is based on you being a regular smoker (IE: at least once a week)

    This Order could be seen as a religion because it is our belief that marijuana (and hemp) is one of the more benifical plants.

    You get more paper and better quality products using hemp over wood. The medical benefits are finally coming to light after years lies and misinformation propagated individuals who were more concerned with their self-image and bank accounts than the actual truth.

    For many, many years pot-smokers have been persecuted, incarcerated, descriminated against and forced into 're-education'.

    If you replace 'pot-smokers' with pretty much any religious denomination the statement remains true.

    --
    The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
    1. Re:My Religion by Bill+Lurker · · Score: 0

      Pot smoking causes brain damage. It used to be and has been used in all types of mind control/mental zombie type religions along with the other psychedelic drugs. The US government has even experimented with it as a "truth" drug.

      And this is from someone that used to smoke pot, and has a degree in anthropology. God can and will save you. Revelation 3:20
      "Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me."

      --
      pope is the antichrist. catholic pedophile priest scandal: http://home.fuse.net/gospel
    2. Re:My Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot smoking causes brain damage?

      Interesting you should say that, especially since pot is one of the least harmful psychoactive drugs. Unlike alcohol, it does _not_ kill brain cells.

      I'm with the Red Eye Knight on this one. Toke or don't toke, there is no try ;-)

    3. Re:My Religion by Stonan · · Score: 1

      Read some scientific studies. You prpbably just listen to the US government which has continually kept its citizens 'in the dark' in order to better control them.

      Nixon funded a study on the effects of marijuana. Scientists proved that what the US government was saying was a complete lie. Nixon threw the study in the trash and embarked on a campain to be the 'big pot-busting president'. We all know what happened to him...

      I have documented and personal proof that pot causing brain damage is a lie (Toked since I was 8, graduated grade school without failing anything and a B+ average majoring in computers, minoring in electronics. Graduated BC Institute of Technology with a 4.5/5 grade point average. Graduated CDI Colledge with a 4.8. When finances allow I will be getting my degree in astrophysics {a promise to my grade 12 physics teacher})

      As for your religious quote, I don't follow that fairy tale and definately do not like it spewed at me. That's one of the major 'selling points' of my religion - We don't force it on you or tell you that what you may believe in now is false. We don't tell you that some entity that no can see is going to 'save you' after you die. Unless you've died and come back to life you do not have ANY right to say that living this existance in a particular way is going to make things better for you after this existance ends.

      Just because it's written in a book doesn't mean it's true and just because many people believe in a non-corporeal entity doesn't mean he/she/it exists.

      --
      The GEEK shall inherit the earth...
  94. Socialist... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

    Alright, who will be the first one to dismiss something in Canada using the phrase:

    "but they're socialist."

    It's what I look for in any /. post that mentions Canada. :-)

    Ex:
    *Something*Something*Something, I really like/I could move to/the right idea, but they're socialist.

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
    1. Re:Socialist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialism in its pure sense, not what we have corrupted into generations of baby-sh|tting welfare mothers, is actually a very gnostic/cathar concept, and it is these concepts I feel 'the force'/'jedi' was based on.

    2. Re:Socialist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... but they're socialist...

    3. Re:Socialist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So was FDR's 'new deal' for all you folks who like waving the red white n blue :)

      So was the Marshall plan, which hasnt hurt anyone since, in the wake of trade between north america and europe.

  95. Jedi rights. by Recovery1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was listening to the radio the other day with a commentary by a radio host. He was referring to the fact that in this country, minority groups seem to have more rights and privledges then the rest of us. Examples that come to mind are the french. They are a big minority in Canada now ( think Chinese is now the second most populous language spoken here now), yet everything has to be labelled to satisfy french speakers. Native Americans have tax breaks, and so on.

    If I was one of the Jedi religion (which I admit I labelled my religion as "none of your business") I would start making as much noise as these other minoity groups. At the very least you can get laws made to wear your uniform and a lightsaber to work.

    1. Re:Jedi rights. by gobbo · · Score: 1

      OMG. Did someone really moderate the parent 'interesting'? Recovery1 it's obvious you need to get out of Moose Jaw more often. Chinese is a common language in Richmond or Vancouver; go to other parts of Canada and you'll find other common languages. French has entrenched language rights because of RECENT history, really you should crack open that Hisory 11 textbook before you fail.

      Your radio host is unlikely to be spouting facts. And since you aren't speaking Cree and wearing buckskin, don't fuss about other settlers adopting local customs. If people ask me what is typical canadian cuisine, I say puffy sweet and sour shrimp, since it's the one culinary consistency you'll find across the nation's small towns, aside from grilled cheese sandwiches.

      Oh, and for now ignore cranks who complain about minority rights, Canadian society is still run with a white supremacy understanding despite all the PC rhetoric. Open your eyes, youngster!

  96. Only 20% attend services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    according to other StatsCan data. That is about right in my experience. Most Canadians are happily agnostic and when asked about their faith, may indicate that they are of Christian descent, which doesn't mean that they are in fact Christian, but is rather a way to indicate that they are not Hindu or Muslim or whatever.

  97. Matrix ppl by pkunzipper · · Score: 1

    In 2006 there will be over a million Americans that declare themselves Zionites, or Matricists, after nations have soaked up the meanings of the beautiful trilogy that we are about to witness.

  98. where do they find teachers? by dorjelorand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, I'm late enough that probably no one will see this comment, let alone mod it up, but what the heck ...

    In the Star Wars movies, the method for becoming a Jedi was to meet one and train under him (or her?). How does anyone outside of the movies do this? Have you ever met an actual Jedi Master?

    I am both a disciple and a teacher in one of the traditions Lucas imitated when he wrote ANH. For the record, Kadampa Buddhism, which was practiced in Tibet until recently. If someone comes up to me and tells me they are a Kadampa, but they have never met a Kadampa before and have never received teachings directly, I know they are mistaken. This is a tradition that must be passed on person-to-person. I always thought Jedi was too.

    Or maybe I'm just taking this way too seriously ...

    Wangden

    --
    -- "You're not fooling me, young man - it's turtles all the way down!"
    1. Re:where do they find teachers? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Step one, touch your tongue to mine.

      [/thumbwars]

      Actually, as I have mentioned before, Jedi is no longer a religion, its an infection of little bugs inside you that make you have pre-cognition, according to the holy videos of EPI.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    2. Re:where do they find teachers? by dorjelorand · · Score: 1

      Actually, as I have mentioned before, Jedi is no longer a religion, its an infection of little bugs inside you that make you have pre-cognition, according to the holy videos of EPI.

      Good point. And how many of us in meatspace have midichlorians?

      But Midichlorians are a side issue anyway. Anakin wasn't a Jedi at birth -- just a guy with pre-cognition and fast reflexes. Jedis are trained, not born.

      Wangden

      --
      -- "You're not fooling me, young man - it's turtles all the way down!"
    3. Re:where do they find teachers? by Darth+Wong · · Score: 1
      In response to:
      In the Star Wars movies, the method for becoming a Jedi was to meet one and train under him (or her?). How does anyone outside of the movies do this? Have you ever met an actual Jedi Master?
      Have you ever met Jesus Christ? No? How about one of those true believers who "can drink deadly poison and it will not hurt them at all"? (Mark 16:18) What's the difference, then?
    4. Re:where do they find teachers? by dorjelorand · · Score: 1

      Have you ever met Jesus Christ? No? How about one of those true believers who "can drink deadly poison and it will not hurt them at all"? (Mark 16:18) What's the difference, then?

      Two diffferences spring to mind:

      1) Jesus Christ is (roughly) the founder or basis of Christianity. It is not necessary to meet him in person in order to become Christian. Neither is it necessary to meet Mohammed to become Muslim or Buddha to become Buddhist. What you're missing is the concept of a lineage -- a chain of teacher-student transmission which maintains a tradition. The Jedi very clearly have this.

      2) The Jedi were not based on Christians. The fact that a Christian may experience miracles or demonstrate miracle powers (with or without a valid lineage back to Jesus Christ) is not relevant because the Jedi were based on Eastern traditions such as Buddhism and Asian martial arts where a lineage is important. Further, someone who spontaneously demonstrates Jedi-like powers is just that: Jedi-like. To be an actual Jedi one must train under a Jedi Master and pass a test administered by the Jedi Council. Good luck finding either one in meatspace.

      Regards,

      Wangden

      --
      -- "You're not fooling me, young man - it's turtles all the way down!"
    5. Re:where do they find teachers? by Darth+Wong · · Score: 1
      To be an actual Jedi one must train under a Jedi Master and pass a test administered by the Jedi Council. Good luck finding either one in meatspace.

      Why do you assume that one must be able to perform miracles in order to be a Jedi? According to Mark 16, any true believer in Christ must also be able to perform miracles, yet we do not disqualify Christians for being unable to do these things. If we take the film as parable and allegory (like another religious document you may know), then it is enough that they teach a set of values in order to consider them a religion.

      Why do you assume that a religion must involve literal interpretation of scientifically testable phenomena? No one applies that rule to Christianity, otherwise it would be disqualified in a heartbeat.

  99. See? See!?? by nastro · · Score: 1

    "Although it's not statistically significant given Canada's population of 31.5 million, 20,000 lightsabre-wielding census-takers is nothing to sneeze at."

    Is this what happens when a socialist-leaning country enforces its gun control laws? Whatever happened to the simple lead pipe, or switchblade, or what have you?

    Now I shall be forced to watch Canadian Bacon yet again. Alas, John Candy!

  100. Jedi Schmedi by Icephreak1 · · Score: 1

    Funny. I'm probably closer to anything remotely resembling a Jedi than ninety-nine percent of those fools. The Jedi are just pretend samurai; I study the real thing. Eishin iaijutsu (iaido).

    P.S. British Columbia is overrun with crazies. No surprise there.

    - IP

  101. Australia?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, no. It started in New Zealand, where all good Australian ideas (and Storm Troopers) come from.

    Have you seen pictures of Oz? Does it look like Yoda's place? No? Didn't think so.

  102. Canadian jedi! by Drakker · · Score: 1

    And he is one of them:

    Star Wars Kid

    Disclaimer: I am Canadian too. The guy is a "friend" of my brother in law. I'm posting this here for humorous reasons only (that makes sense? ;) No bad feelings involved.

    Now laugh on. :)

    (PS. I checked "No Karma Bonus" so moderate this post any way you see fit, I just don't want to gain Karma at the expense of this guy. I personnaly don't think it's off-topic.)

  103. uhmm yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause canadian's have the same members of government as the US does.

    Let me guess, you're american.

    it wasn't john ashcroft, it was Priminister Poutine.

    1. Re:uhmm yeah by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      that's Prime Minister you fucking retard

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:uhmm yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Prime Minister Poutine. That's the guy...

      Decisive, and delicious.

  104. this sounds so familiar... by vindaci · · Score: 1

    This story sounds so familiar... thought it was a dupe, but it's another story of the same things happenning all over the world:

    ::shrug::

  105. The force is strong with this one... by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why not, when every I fill out all the "mandatory" information I purposely put in erroneous info, because it's none of their damn business. There's got to be a couple of hundred profiles out their on me.

    I'm anywhere from 11 to 80 years of age, with my birthday falling between Jan 1 and Dec 30, and tend to make over $100,000 every year as an unemployed home maker that specializes in a technical career field. I am of multiple genders, races, and religions. I always live at 1234 Somewhere Ave. My phone number is 911-123-4567 feel free to call day or night. Now of course if it's for something important like pre-ordering Star Wars Galaxies (ok so I'm a nerd get over it), I tend to be honest enough with my info to get my credit card approved, but nothing more.

  106. Sith worship by H*oruzzz · · Score: 0

    Those Canadians just don't understand it. It's not the Jedi who should be worshipped it's the Sith.

    Darth Sidious we're not worthy, we're not worthy.

    You Canadians you're all alike. With your beady litle eyes and flappering heads.

  107. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    20,000 jedhi worshippers = 20,000 Slashdot geeks.

  108. Heh by frienemy · · Score: 1

    The irony here being the US administration is planning to build a large "missle defence shield"
    dun dun du-duunn dun duh-dun dun duh-duuuunnn

  109. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birds...the Romulans have birds, not chicks

  110. Re:Mission Impossible? by silne · · Score: 1

    er, i'm a Miss (not a Ms or Mr). Sorry to ruin your day :-P

  111. make that isn't for Korea. by tmortn · · Score: 1

    dought .. Korea has them and their problem ISN'T religious fanatacisim.

    --
    I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
  112. Re:Mission Impossible? by cyberkreiger · · Score: 1

    "Ms" includes both "Miss" and "Mrs", and is applicable regardless of marital status, although courtesy requires that you respect someones wish to be addressed as either "Miss" or "Mrs".

    By the way, don't you think slashdot might be the wrong place to go pointing out your unmarried status?

    --
    Stumbling in the dark
    I hear slavering of jaws
    Eaten by a grue.
  113. Re:Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the cred by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
    Fuck you to, you god-damn, pavlova-stealing barstards!

    ;)

    Oh yeah....We will change our flag, with great delight. It will be a picture of a big slice of pavlova....With cream, strawberries, kiwifruit and all! :P

  114. In Canada by nuggz · · Score: 1

    I thought I mailed it to a center somewhere.
    But my form was VERY basic.

    1. Re:In Canada by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Some 'lucky' people got an extended version of the census, filled out multiple times over a period of months. Whee. Personally, I have no experience with the basic form - I've never even seen one.

      For the record, at the time I lived in Mississauga, Ontario. For non-Canadian readers who might want to locate Mississauga on a map, it is about 20 km west-southwest of Toronto along Lake Ontario.

  115. Jedis do it with a mind trick by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

    "While it show that some people may have too much time on their hands, it also raises questions of privacy rights, Internet activism and data integrity."

    That it does, and personally I promoted the idea amongst my peers in the UK because we already answer a whole raft of questions for demographics under the threat of a whopping fine for fibbing.

    The cute thing is that our political structure has mutated into something that consists of a large amount of mediocrity, and the assumption that the people will do as they're told and supply, without question, any and all information requested.

    Nu-huh

    Although recent studies have suggested that people will give away things like their passwords at the drop of the hat. The register did a story on the piss-poor attitude towards social engineering in this country.

    We also occasionally swap customer loyalty cards as a method of 'tainting' the marketing information that stores collect, partly out of sheer schadenfreude and partly because if this trend continues, choice will be honed to a fine needle-point of majority acceptance.

    The main point behind the Jedi thing was apart from anything else, it showed the power of a large majority of people working together.

    Oddly Drac (Peoples front of Jedi)

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  116. 20k jedi?` by Resound · · Score: 1

    Even when 900,000 you reach, look as God you will not. ("Sir, I'm going to need that pen back" "Mine! Or I will help you not.")

  117. I'm confused by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

    B.C. leads Canada in the "no religion" category at 35% and it is also the largest religious group in the Province.

    Not to be picky, but how can "no religion" be a religion group? It could be the highest response to the religion question.

    It's like saying that Microsoft, the worlds largest software maker, does not make software. ...hmmm, bad example, but you know what I mean.

    --
    It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    1. Re:I'm confused by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

      I was just using the nomenclature that Stats Canada employed in the religion breakdown.

      I agree that it sounds weird to refer to non-religous persons as a religous group, but in the context of the census, it makes sense.

      By the way, do you happen to have Fruit of the Loom Ladies Panties size large (any color) would you? Used, of course.

  118. I would like to know... by rediguana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how they could prove that an individual who puts Jedi on the form does not believe in the faith, and hence lied, and should be fined? Sure it might not be a 'recognised' religion but authorities can't prove that it is not a religion, any less than they can prove other religions actually are real!

  119. Atheists on the Rise by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Informative

    The most significant element of this release, and the greatest hope I have for my country, is that the people who report "no-religion" exploded from 12% to 16%, making "no-religion" the 2nd largest group (RC was mid40s).

    see here for a synopsis @ statcan

    1. Re:Atheists on the Rise by HermanZA · · Score: 1

      Atheists/agnostics are actually way more numerous than that. The StatsCan question was loaded to favour religion. They asked something like: "What is your religious affiliation, irrespective of whether you are an active member." In other research, they found that only 20% of Canadians are active religious members, so there clearly are a good many people who matured and abandoned religion, but still mention their affiliation since they were baptized as a baby in some religious sect. Eventually people mature and realize that it was their parents that had them baptized, they had no say in the matter themselves and then speak up and admit that they are non-religious. So, just looking at the circles I move in, the actual percentage of agnostics is around 60%. This probably explains why Canadians are considered 'friendly and tolerant'. The churches are not able to incite their particular intolerance and hatred in the general populous.

  120. There's a .org website for Jediism by way2muchsense · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.jediism.org/

    I suppose that makes them legit.

  121. I told the census takers.... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2, Funny

    That my religious affiliation was "Elbonian". Alternatively, you could say you're Izzian or Izbian.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  122. Reply:Jedi Schmedi by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    x
    Ice Phreak1,

    Nice name.

    I must say, that my money would be on any good Scot with a golf club (substituting for a claymore) in hand would leave a Samurai balls-less in a murderous contest for two. Scots are not a fancy folk, but they will competently use any tool in hand to finish a job appropriately. Also, a good Scot will always have a Scottish Bushido heart.

    I hope to here, in the future fusion music, compositions for tyco drums and bagpipes for our folks around the world.

    Have Fun

    OldHawk777

    Reality is a self-induced hallucination.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
    1. Re:Reply:Jedi Schmedi by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      That depends. If what this fine fellow is learning is kendo, then yes; he'd be useless in a fight.

      If, on the other hand, he's learning kenshindo, then he'd be full of dirty tricks and battle-worthy combat techniques.

      And I'll point out that the Scottish fighting system is a bit less than optimal against a disciplined opponent; reference a cohort of 500 Romans destroying a mob of ten *thousand* angry Scots.

      After all, Conner McLeod of Clan McLeod wound up learning Japanese swordplay techniques...:-)

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Reply:Jedi Schmedi by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

      You know your history well. I know the story is true ....

      Scotish women make very poor military leaders, but they look great in front of you. I have known Women Scots that I would follow anytime, any place.

      French women are good military leaders, but they get burned at the stake and some are pain to live with for a couple weeks.

      OldHawk777

      --
      Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
    3. Re:Reply:Jedi Schmedi by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      Scotish women make very poor military leaders, but they look great in front of you. I have known Women Scots that I would follow anytime, any place.

      Seconded.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  123. I know, I know by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

    I realize this was a whole Imperial reference (to the movie) but I'm sort of irked at the general attitude. And religion doesn't often come up to bat on /. so I'll take my offtopic moderation if so necessary for a few peole to read.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  124. bless you by smoothPorn · · Score: 1

    20,000 lightsabre-wielding census-takers is nothing to sneeze at.

    Yes. Yes it is.

    --

    Wank it at SmoothPorn.
  125. Sith by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

    When I saw "Sikh" listed in the Top 10 tables, I thought it said "Sith"

    --
    bp
  126. The numbers will only grow in time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just like using Snoopy as a presidential write-in, this will be the "protest" answer in the future.

    What should be the real issue is if some "Jedi Temple" gets a 501C3, which would give them tax-exempt status in the US for "religious" companies.

    I say company because any "church" with one is a COMPANY, not a RELIGIOUS GROUP. Any group that would agree to be monitored in their speech just for a few extra dollars is no more than a company wanting to get every last cent from their "customers".

  127. Prior Art by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the Jedi religion was from long, long ago and far, far away. If that isn't prior art, what is?

  128. The Force and Gnosticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    www.gnostic-force.freeservers.com

    The above site has some thoughts I've been putting to paper (or screen) over the last few years. I doubt Lucas could sue a 'Force' religion (tho possibly Jedi) because 'force' is just a word like 586 is a word...

  129. The Force and Gnosticism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    www.gnostic-force.freeservers.com

    The above site has some thoughts I've been putting to paper (or screen) over the last few years. I doubt Lucas could sue a 'Force' religion (tho possibly Jedi) because 'force' is just a word like 586 is a word...

  130. Tax Status by Presence1 · · Score: 1
    BTW, not-for-profit != "non-profit", the former is a tax status (more precisely a not-federally-and-other-places-taxed status) and the latter means you do not make a profit.

    Not-For-Profit basically means that there can be no retained earnings. A regular For-Profit business can have retained earnings or losses at the end of a year, which sould be the source of dividens, etc. Non-Profits must distribute all their earnings, presumably to the beneficiaries of their charity, although it often seems to be more towards their executives...

  131. Re:why couldn't they just follow a normal religion by raider_red · · Score: 1

    Whoever said that never saw the price on convention merchandise.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  132. Damn... by (trb001) · · Score: 1

    ...where's the (Score: -1) Bad Pun when you need it?

  133. Get it regular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe you're thinking of Metamucil.

  134. and 390,000 in UK by Mikkee · · Score: 0
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2757067.stm

    maybe more than that in USA ?

  135. I find your lack of faith.. disturbing by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 1

    followed by much heavy breathing

    --
    This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
  136. Imagine the Force as a white ball of healing light by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

    Anyone else have the Fight Club soundtrack? Isn't this drivel a cousin to that preceding Brad Pitt's rap at the end of the CD?

    "You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake.
    "You are the same decaying bits in a Lucasfilm renderfarm as the rest of us.
    "You are the all-singing, all-dancing crap of the galaxy.
    "You are not the speederbike you fly.
    "You are not the brown robes you wear.
    "You are not the temple where you are trained.
    "You are not your seeker ball.
    "You are NOT your FUCKING LIGHTSABER!"

    Conspir8or

  137. Gnostic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a definite strain of mystical, almost Gnostic sensibility...

    Gnostic? Is there a KDE alternative to that? Kostic perhaps?

  138. Trade? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But we have all the little fur hats we can handle already. Eh.

  139. Like I'd tell the government THAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean sure, I'm with you 100%, and on Slashdot I'll show a little solidarity (except I'll post as A/C), but if you think I'm gonna tell the government that, you're insane! (Besides, they gave me the short census form. =)

  140. who could resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May the force be with you, eh.

  141. Repeat after me by aralin · · Score: 1

    There is no error, but Emperror
    And Darth Vader is his profit.

    --
    If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  142. Religion as entertainment... by DrCode · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree that it sounds fairly goofy that people are claiming to follow the Jedi 'religion'. But I've thought that it's possible that other, mainstream, religions may have started in similar ways.

    Look at the Greek 'myths'; they're really good stories. Maybe they started purely as stories, and that it was only over several generations that people started to accept them as real.

  143. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by conteXXt · · Score: 1

    relax.

    We have really good weed up here. They were just joking around. Must have been that Jedi bud going around last census time.....

    Like Weed tea?

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  144. Re:I think you missed his point by japhmi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Getting married will kill your sexlife 9 times out of 10. The one guy is the lucky bastard :)

    Hey, my parents were married when I was conceived!

    --
    "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  145. Re:Ack, Damn Aussies always manage to get the cred by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Jedi religion didn't come from New Zealand. It began a long time ago in a galaxy far far away.

    Where do you think New Zealand *is*?

  146. Re:I think you missed his point by japhmi · · Score: 1

    Ummm... maybe you should read up on history a bit. Jesus was executed for being a rebel-rouser, the taxes were not collected for the 'state gods.'

    --
    "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
  147. Yes by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    Yes Yoda is a little green pimp.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  148. Re:Significant sosiology phenomena by taperkat · · Score: 1

    Admit it: you just like the pointy ears and the dominatrix outfits. :)

    --
    "But I can't get an ocean that's deep enough for my day..." ~The Frames, "Fitzcarraldo"
  149. Lots of religions "eliminate" animals... by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of kosher food? Creating kosher meat is a part of judaism. There was also a test case in Florida several years ago for practictioners of Santeria, a religion with the same roots as Voodoo, and animals are killed as part of it. (And more humanely than they ever would be in a processing plant too!) Local kosher butchers came in on the side of the Santeros, otherwise their own practices could have people fooling with them. The Supreme Court ruled that animal sacrifice is protected under the first amendment.

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon
  150. Oh Dear God by UglyBoy · · Score: 1

    Um, I mean Yoda...

  151. Re:I think you missed his point by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

    Umm... I had never really thought about it this way until my Roman history professor brought it up in class. I think he has read plenty of history, at least a lot more than either of us I should think. He does have a doctorate after all.

  152. Taz by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Taz I like. But how dare they make the kiwi yellow! They're as bad as Taito (with The New Zealand Story). Everyone knows Kiwis are brown, have a huge beak, don't fly, are nocturnal and lay huge eggs for their size. They do not look like yellow chicks!

  153. Organized religious business by whitehat · · Score: 1

    is the corner stone of MANY of the "major religions."

    The Catholic church is (subject to current pedophile lawsuits) the largest open, tax free business in the US with all the property they own and the non-religion related use of their properties. The courts are just afraid to get involved. ie, the church buys an apartment builing in NYC, rents out the storefronts and apartments and then takes in the rent. The tenants, many of whom are NOT Catholic, carry on their lives in a 'tax exempt' building because of the owner, not its proper use under the tax law.

  154. I entered "Jedi" on the Census by Darth+Wong · · Score: 1

    I did it as a form of protest, not so much against the census itself but against the notion that some religions are more "valid" than others. I await some idiot government lawyer's attempt to "prove" that the Jedi religion is somehow not legitimate, while other religions are.

    What makes a religion "legitimate?" Numbers of followers? We've got that. Supernatural beliefs? We've got that. Scriptures? We've got that; a whole bunch of films. Unless a religion needs a history of oppressing others in order to be considered "legitimate", there's really no valid criteria for declaring, say, Catholicism any more of a "valid" religion than Jedi.

  155. Re:I think you missed his point by japhmi · · Score: 1

    He does have a doctorate after all.
    I've learned from my time in college is just because someone has a doctorate doesen't mean he knows what he's talking about all the time. :-) After all, I can walk over the the Religious Studies department at the (state) college I work for and find at least 2 of my old professors who would disagree (2 doctorates against 1!)

    --
    "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke