Slashdot Mirror


T-Mobile Dumps MS SmartPhone

burgburgburg writes "It seems that T-Mobile International, Europe's second largest mobile phone operator, has decided against introducing a Microsoft SmartPhone after all. T-Mobile had announced their plans in February to introduce the MS SmartPhone this summer. Industry insiders say that the software for the phone continued to have 'fundamental problems,' leading to a high failure rate. French mobile carrier Orange introduced a MS SmartPhone, SPV, late last year. It initially had software security problems which Microsoft has claimed are patched."

294 comments

  1. it figures...... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....That a french cell phone would surrender so easily.

    1. Re:it figures...... by andrewscraig · · Score: 1, Funny

      Of course, the fact that T-Mobile are a spin-off from Deutsche telecom means nothing!

    2. Re:it figures...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      ....That a french cell phone would surrender so easily.

      No, it doesn't figure. It's not a French phone at all. It's manufactured by a Taiwanese company for a German customer. And with which part of the phone is there a problem? The software developed by Microsoft, a U.S. company.

    3. Re:it figures...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone PLEASE mod this down. Offensive, clearly wrong and just the sort of stuff that has been stoking anti-american sentiment... Maybe the French wouldn't have to use their veto if the US started acting responsibly.

    4. Re:it figures...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a bullshit artist - both of you. And to call this funny...
      Well, US citizens like to bash every other nation despite here it's all about a strictly technical question?
      I don't think T-mobile wants to push Siemens or similar.
      I think they don't want to put a lot of money into that phone to push it into an acceptable price-range, when they feel, it's not ready.

      And Nokia is finnish (and most phone are), so keep thinking, please.

    5. Re:it figures...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't someone mod this down, when the U.S. gets involved in something people complain, when they don't people complain.

    6. Re:it figures...... by kanthoney · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The US didn't just get involved with this one, they started it. Whole different kettle of fish.

  2. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    does it run linux?

    1. Re:But... by mirko · · Score: 1

      does it play OGG ? :-)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    2. Re:But... by hplasm · · Score: 1

      does it run Windows? Nah.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    3. Re:But... by Dean+Sas · · Score: 1

      yeah once you unlock it, well the orange version does iirc

  3. yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by atlasheavy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just wait for version 3.0 to come out. That'll probably be good enough to whack Nokia and Qualcomm around. Think about it: Windows, Pocket PC, Tablet PC, etc. All of these products didn't really do well until version 3 rolled around. MS usually tries to get a product into a niche just to get experience there. They then spend the next few years figuring out means to really grab hold of the niche, and then they dominate it. That's how it works with them. Not a bad business strategy at all. In fact, it's really good one.

    --

    iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    1. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by jkrise · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Windows, Pocket PC, Tablet PC, etc. All of these products didn't really do well until version 3 rolled around."

      Huh.. except Windows, I wouldn't say anything else in that list has done well. Unless you meant doing well as "Educating prospects about better alternatives". IE, WMP etc haven't done MS any good - and they're already at versions 6 and 9.

      It even appears that MS partners are now treating them like MS used to, not so long ago. Kinda suggests the Windows success has proved very costly for MS, actually.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    2. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, but their competitors before were either small companies (Netscape) playing on MS turf (the desktop) or too dense to figure out they were being screwed until it was too late (IBM).

      Problem for MS is that there aren't a lot of those companies left. The small guys stay out of the way, or are already out of business, and the big guys don't trust MS.

      Of the three big pushes MS is putting on right now:

      • Smartphones: very strong, very popular incumbant - MS failing badly.
      • Consoles: very strong, very popular incumbant - MS throwing enough money at it to put in a good showing, but still not even close to winning
      • Online access: large but unstable incumbant, MS doing well by some measures, but everybody (including MS) getting destroyed by telcos and cable companies that are taking over the market.

      I suppose you could add to that the server OS market: MS looked like it was going to take over, and had lots of momentum, but the old guard (Unix, OS/390) held out long enough for a different kind of competitor (Linux) to start pushing back. It's unlikely that MS will grow their server market share any further, and it looks like they're headed for a gradual decline.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    3. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Pocket PC is OK. My Pocket PC handheld runs Linux just fine and is quite flexible and useful. Well... my "Built For Pocket PC" handheld.

    4. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by SensitiveMale · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not a bad business strategy at all. In fact, it's really good one.

      Actually no. As a business strategy it sucks.

      If any other business tried it they would go down faster than a drunk girl at prom.

      Microsoft has always has the DOS/Windows OEM sales to keep them afloat when the first 2 revisions fail.

      And since ms can keep tossing money away and their competitors can't, ms usually wins out of attrition.

      Ms simply has deeper pockets than everyone else because of DOS/Win OEM sales.

    5. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suppose you could add to that the server OS market: MS looked like it was going to take over, and had lots of momentum, but the old guard (Unix, OS/390) held out long enough for a different kind of competitor (Linux) to start pushing back. It's unlikely that MS will grow their server market share any further, and it looks like they're headed for a gradual decline.

      I don't know about that one. With the latest lawsuits from SCO people might be wise to reconsider any large Linux server implementations in the near future until this works itself out. You wouldn't want your company to get sued for going with the "free" server software that doesn't seem to have all it's patent ducks in order do you? That's the benefit of closed source operating systems like Windows though. Who is to say that SCO didn't steal the routines in question from Linux? With Windows, you have no access to the source code so there can be none of these problems.

    6. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Mwongozi · · Score: 1

      IE, WMP etc haven't done MS any good

      How can you say that? IE, at version 3, was way better than Netscape 3, at the time the only serious competition around. Hell, it was better than Netscape 4 too, but that wasn't difficult. IE got Microsoft the dominant position in the browser wars.

      And WMP has allowed WMA to become the "standard" for DRM and encrypted audio. I think those two products have indeed done MS a lot of good.

    7. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually its pretty good already. I bought the Orange SPV in November and here's my experience so far:

      Initially it was usable but fairly buggy. The battery life was appalling (the radio side of the phone was using more power than it needed to), the menus were slow, it kept pausing half way through entering an sms, the key lock didn't prevent the backlight from coming on when a key was pressed(making battery life even worse) etc etc.

      Anyway by February they had a patch out which cured all of these problems (battery life still isn't the best but no worse than any other phone with a large well lit colour screen) and the only bug left that bothers me is that the T9 dictionay periodically loses all the custom words I've entered into it.

      Where I think that Microsoft have got right, however is their positioning of the smartphone platform as a phone first and a PDA second. I've seen and used all its major competitors (sony P800, Nokia 7210, Nokia 3650) and they're all either:

      phones with nowhere near the functionality of the SPV
      or
      PDA's with phone features, which are more powerful than the SPV but are bigger, more expensive and cannot really be operated one handed.

      As a note on the security hole discovered that allows unsigned applications to run. Not to excuse Microsoft here but when Orange launched the SPV here in the UK they crippled it so that no unsigend applications could run and the only way to get your application signed was through Orange at an exorbitant cost(£200 per application if I remember correctly). The result of this was that pretty much everybody who bought an SPV tried to break the certification as most bought it due to the potential of running/developing their own applications. I also think that the method of breaking the certification required you to have physical access to the the phone, which puts into perspective some of the more hysterical stories of the time.

    8. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IE, WMP etc haven't done MS any good - and they're already at versions 6 and 9.

      WMP did not progress, like IE, but rather turned into a festering piece of shit right after 7.0; It joined the ranks of all the moderately good applications (non-MS) which slid into bloat.

      Also, I don't buy your argument how IE hasn't done any good to MS. That's total hogwash. We all know that IE dominates the browser market. (Sad, but true)
    9. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by timmyf2371 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Internet Explorer: Agreed - I can't see it benefiting MS with the exception of market share. Unless, however, there is a master plan in place to charge all those corporations/individuals royalty fees in future for embedding the IE rendering component within applications. (note that this would open up a completely new can of worms in terms of current licensing which I'm not discussing here).

      And with regards to WMP, I think one of the other replies says it all. Its a platform which is available on 95% of the world's desktops (give or take a few of us Mac & Linux users) and I'm sure their masterplan is to liase with the recording industry and create a secure computing platform (not my words) for the playback of music.

      Tim

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    10. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by jkrise · · Score: 2, Informative

      "IE got Microsoft the dominant position in the browser wars."

      It also got them:
      Zero revenue.
      Hundreds of headaches and bugs.
      Negative media coverage in the anti-trust trial.

      Not worth it, IMO.

      "And WMP has allowed WMA to become the "standard" for DRM and encrypted audio. "

      Music and content thru DRM and encrypted audio could be less than 1% of the total music market. Setting a standard in a niche segment doesn't count for much.

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    11. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it: Windows, Pocket PC, Tablet PC, etc.

      nope... none of the above is STILL reliable enough to be used in a critical environment. Microsoft's embedded OS's are shunned by all manufacturers except for use in toys like PDA's nobody in their right mind would put lives in the hands of a MS OS.

      and the tablet PC extensions for Windows were the BEST on the Windows 3.11 series.... what they released for 95/98 was horrible crap and this XP junk is even worse.

      Sorry but windows and tablet computing was at it's best in 1989... then it went downhill.

      and windows CE is complete and utter crap. anyone saying otherwise is a complete moron.

    12. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by MonTemplar · · Score: 1

      It also got them:
      Zero revenue.
      Hundreds of headaches and bugs.
      Negative media coverage in the anti-trust trial.

      Not worth it, IMO.


      Ah, but you forgot about

      Persuade people to stick with the browser that comes with Windows, rather than using another one.

      On that level, IE is a stunning success.

      Music and content thru DRM and encrypted audio could be less than 1% of the total music market. Setting a standard in a niche segment doesn't count for much.

      For now. But if DRM does take off, Microsoft has that base covered. That's the plan, as I see it.

      --
      -MT.
    13. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Brissie_lad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And where is IE today?
      Lets have a look....

      IE & cookies = Yes or No.
      Any Other Browser & cookies = What Ever The Fuck You Want.
      IE & pop-ups = Find and install a pop-up stopper.
      AOB & pop-ups = WETFYW
      IE & tabbed browsing = What are tabs?
      AOB & tabbed browsing = WETFYW

      --
      Slackware - because apt is for the lazy.
    14. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      They then spend the next few years figuring out means to really grab hold of the niche, and then they dominate it.

      That was the strategy of fledgling pre-NT Microsoft. The new strategy is, get a foot in the door and then buy the place.

    15. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Surak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IE, WMP etc haven't done MS any good - and they're already at versions 6 and 9.

      Internet Explorer hasn't done MS any good? Huh?

      The entire purpose of Internet Explorer was to put Netscape out of business, and it did essentially that. Netscape made the mistake of touting its Communicator product, combined with its Web server software and Java and JavaScript technologies as an applications platform, rendering the underlying OS as being largely irrelevant. Microsoft responded with Internet Explorer and began the whole 'embrace and extend' strategy towards Internet standards and the rest is history.

      As for Windows Media Player -- I'm not even sure what Microsoft's goals were for that. ;)

    16. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by rutledjw · · Score: 2, Interesting
      IE, WMP etc haven't done MS any good I'll disagree with you here. Financially, these products were disasters. From a loss-lead standpoint they've been great in helping MS maintain control over the desktop.

      However, if you stick to addressing the parent posters comments re: "Tablet PC and Pocket PC", I don't think either can be called a "stunning success". I don't know ANYONE using Tablet and PocketPC has been mixed with about 1/2 the folks I know returning them or getting tired of them early on

      PocketPC only had a chance as there wasn't a real alternative at first for the fancy windows-type PDA. Now Linux-based PDAs are picking up steam and people are finding that maybe a PDA doesn't need all those bells and whistles.

      IMHO, MS phone is dead. Instability is bad enough, but once phone-viruses come out? Good grief, do people want MS on their PHONE?

      Re-reading the parent, I think it may have been a VERY-well written troll. Nicely done if that's the case...

      --

      Computer Science is Applied Philosophy
    17. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by SuperJames_74 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can get WMP for Mac. Or, at least, for OSX on Mac...

      --

      @sshatrack

    18. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Mwongozi · · Score: 2, Informative

      And where is IE today?
      Lets have a look....

      And yet 90% of the net is still using IE? Why? Because features like that don't matter to Joe User. IE is "good enough", and inertia wins. They can't be bothered to upgrade.

    19. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Brissie_lad · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt...wrong, MS got what they wanted with IE, so it's no surprise that the "inovations" are now being applied to DRM.

      --
      Slackware - because apt is for the lazy.
    20. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Too late IMHO, Symbian nearly have the market wrapped up now.

      A Smartphone needs to be smart, it needs to actually work as business folks don't have the tolerance of geeks.

      Yes, PocketPC devices did sell well eventually, but the competition was quite weak. It has taken Palm a long time to move to ARM processors and increase their screen resolution.

      Smartphones however are a different market, Symbian OS is available as source so each phone maker can customise it, the apps don't need signing (was needed for the SPV to start with) and since there are many more licensees there are also many users and developers.

    21. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by glesga_kiss · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Oh great. Another MS bashing article.

      I have the first SmartPhone, the Orange SPV. Without a doubt, it is the best phone I've ever seen. Here's some of the key features that not many phones can even do half of.

      • MSN Messenger
      • 65,000 colour display
      • Plays mp3, wma, divx, mpeg with full screen video (I used to have SW EP2 on it)
      • Ringtones and notifications are wav files. Make your own, or download millions of free ones
      • IMAP/POP e-mail
      • Syncs Contacts, Appointments, Tasks and E-mail with Active Sync. If you have a corporate Exchange system, this is fantastic
      • Proper internet browser, not WAP, can browse real sites
      • Games that are light years ahead of the Nokia java ones
      • Game Boy Color emulator
      • NES emulator
      • Pocket SCUMM

      The UI is a dream. There is no dispute, MS know how to make an easy to use and intuative interface. It's a logical, object oriented interface, where you can easilly jump around to related tools. It's a pocket PC, not a phone.

      With respect to the "security hole" found, some clarification is required. The "hole" allows someone to perform a hard reset on the phone, during which you can tweak a file to disable the application signing lock that Orange had implemented. This benefited users as the software community exploded. Less than a week later, DOOM, DivX and many games had been ported. Orange now offer over-the-air unlocking, due to the explosion of interest since the community started.

      This phone platform has the largest number of free (as in speach and beer) applications available. VNC, Telnet etc have all been done (no SSH yet :-(

      Sure, it was a little buggy at times. Until the update several months ago. Now, the only time you'll have problems are when you are messing around with Beta software that is still under development. Out of the box, the phone is extremely reliable.

      No other phone comes close. So, it's the first product in a whole new platform. Were the first builds of DOS any good? No. The first builds of Windows. Of course not. And the first builds of Linux? Don't make me laugh.

      But it's MS, so I'll probably get modded down by the zealots.

      PS I admin three Linux servers myself, the OS of my personal choice. I'm not pro-MS. It's just a really good phone. Wait until the new ones come out though, it's not the best hardware design, a little top heavy.

    22. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet 90% of the net is still using IE?

      I highly doubt it's 90%. I think it's a lot lower but with a certain percentage _faking_ to be IE to be able to view certain braindead IE-only sites.

      1. Let's make that site for IE, it's what 90% use.
      2. Fuck, that site doesn't work with !IE. If we fake being an IE we can actually see _some_ of the content
      3. See, 90% use IE. Our logs say so.
      4. Duh!

    23. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by weave · · Score: 1
      I have the first SmartPhone, the Orange SPV... [long list of features snipped]

      Yeah, but how does it work as a phone? I've read a lot about current generation of cell phones on the cellular newsgroups, and consensus is pretty much that the newer pda-type phones are causing the phone function to suffer. Battery life takes a hit, sound quality takes a hit, output power takes a hit (they do 200mw instead of old 600mw), and reliability takes a hit. Buggy phone software can actually cause the phone to crash and reboot during a call. I don't need that.

      While there are always differing opinions, allegedly the last great cell phone made was the Motorola Startac 7868W (or cousins).

      Notice: This post is US-centric

    24. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by hetairoi · · Score: 1

      Ms simply has deeper pockets than everyone else because of DOS/Win OEM sales.

      I'd say that's Not a bad business strategy at all. In fact, it's really good one.

      I have more money than you, I will grind you into oblivion. Seems like a winning strategy to me.

      --
      you're all figments of my deranged imagination
    25. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you crazy?

      MS doesn't get paid through revenue bunnylove, they get paid through CONTROL of the market. Shareprice is how they get paid and shareprice for MS is linked to perceptions of the general future of the PC market and MS' degree of control over it.

      IE permits them to control the networked distributed components future as Windows permitted them to control the past. It's the user INTERFACE that makes for the chokehold since the lameness of users is the one most powerful unchangeable factor in computing.

      IE was vitally necessary to the future of MS as a stock pyramid. How can you say it wasn't worth it?

    26. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely with Windows products it is even worse, because you have no access to the source code. There's no way of knowing if the code is infringing before it's too late. Remember the fuss over MS-SQL. With a company like Microsoft, there's no way of knowing which patents they are knowingly infringing on until it gets to court.

      If SCO had a strong argument they would already have pointed out where the code was copied, so it looks like their suit is just fluff.

    27. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Comparing IE 3.0 to Netscape 3 and 4? IE 3.0 was a complete waste of disk space. IE got really good when 4.0 came out, I'll give you that, and 4.01 while only a point release, seriously improved IE's javascript to the point that it rendered Netscape a useless toy. It is infact, IE 4.0 that turned me away from Netscape for good, although Mozilla is bringing me back. :-)

    28. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by LuxuryBoy · · Score: 1

      No other phone comes close? Not so, the SonyEricsson P800 has all the features and software you list and more.

    29. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      And yet 90% of the net is still using IE? Why? Because features like that don't matter to Joe User. IE is "good enough", and inertia wins. They can't be bothered to upgrade.

      Way, way, WAAAY off-topic here, but 80%-90% of the net is using IE because nearly 100% of the browsing is done from desktops of which 80%-90% have Windows and IE installed from the seller/distributor/factory. I.E., it's the default. Since there is friction in changing the default settings (especially when it comes to installing a different browser), most people don't do it. That's why there are so many MS-specific worms out there...they take advantage of insecure default settings* which most people don't change.

      *Like the very existence of Internet Explorer itself.

    30. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      The small guys stay out of the way, or are already out of business, and the big guys don't trust MS.

      With all the negative attention that MS has received, more competitors are aware of the typical embrace, extend, and extinguish strategy. So they are more careful in their relationships with MS than they used to be.

      I suppose you could add to that the server OS market:

      One of the newest areas of the server push is the 64 bit x86 servers coming out. MS is in the race with Intel's Itanium, but they are behind with AMD's Opteron. All of this, however, may be moot.

      Most consumers don't have a need for 64 bit applications. With the exception of DB servers, most businesses don't either, especially in this economy. Even if MS takes the lead for the moment, it'll be years before this market is large enough to affect their bottom line.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    31. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      As for Windows Media Player -- I'm not even sure what Microsoft's goals were for that. ;)

      To dominate and maintain monopoly... What product has MS released that maintaining a monopoly wasn't the underlying agenda? Mind you for M$ Maintaining market share is maintaining a monoploy. The only Innovation MS has shown is on how to maintain a monopoly.. They really don't care much for thier customer .. Who wants DRM? Not consumers... But its comming down the pipe and MS wants to secure that portion of the market so Its doing everything it can to be the "Leader"

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    32. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      As for Windows Media Player -- I'm not even sure what Microsoft's goals were for that.

      I'll tell you what - Microsoft's strategy with Windows Media is much scarier than anything it ever did with IE.

      With a VERY DRM-capable media player on 90% of the world's desktops and audio equipment, Microsoft is positioning themselves to be a toll-booth between the media outlets and the consumers. You think they're rich now? Wait until they're getting licensing fees for EVERY song that comes from the Big 5.

    33. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 2, Informative

      It also got them:
      Zero revenue.
      Hundreds of headaches and bugs.
      Negative media coverage in the anti-trust trial.

      Microsoft doesn't care about zero revenue, as long as their business objectives are achieved. Consider the XBox: they were losing money when they were selling it for $300, and they're sure as hell going to continue to lose money now that they're lowering it to $180. In fact, year-over-year losses for the XBox have doubled, but they're still in the market, looking for a way to outflank Sony and Nintendo.

      Hundreds of headaches and bugs? What do they care about that? Apparently as much as they do about secure computing..... and if you've seen their scorecard for the last few months (the Passport and Hotmail fiascos being only the most recent examples), you'd realize this really isn't a major concern for them. They'll continue to insist that the NEXT version of [insert operating system / web service / application name here] will be much more stable, secure and robust -- and people will buy it.

      Thing MS is scared of negative media coverage about the antitrust trial. It's over, and guess what? THEY WON IT. Yes, it cost a grotesque sum of money; yes, they received a Thanksgiving-sized helping of negative press. But they avoided some major potential liabilities: having to split up their company into "Baby Bills"; having to open up (or open source) parts, if not the whole of their operating system to competitors; having to unbundle Internet Explorer, or being prevented from integrating applications into the OS going forward; or being legally obligated to follow certain practices that would impair their ability to maintain a soft monopoly on the markets they currently dominate.

    34. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      IE would have been well worth it if IIS hadn't been such a pile of dung. However IIS is due for a complete rewrite and rumors suggest that it's actually getting it (probably a completely .NET IIS) so the proliferation of IE could pay off in a way other than the destruction of Netscape, in that IIS will be more attractive when it is no longer THE internet security nightmare, and IE is everywhere.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    35. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Consoles: very strong, very popular incumbant - MS throwing enough money at it to put in a good showing, but still not even close to winning

      Microsoft has a good chance to own this market. While Sony is some of the most fearsome competition ever seen in the console gaming space, what we have here is an unstoppable force (microsoft) charging into an unmovable object (sony, obviously.) Nintendo is experiencing soft sales but unless things change significantly there will always be room for Nintendo in the gaming market. (First place, second place, and nintendo, right?)

      The next-generation xbox will feature PVR functionality. It's already replacing the DVD, I expect it to replace the PVR, and possibly the cable box. It could already be a set top box, if they would just release a browser for it; Of course, it already IS a set top box, if you install linux on it, but since that requires hacking let's stick to what you can do with licensed software. Xbox is not going to die any time soon, and if anyone could unseat Sega, it would be Microsoft.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    36. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "Proper internet browser, not WAP, can browse real sites"
      You mean Pocket IE? The embedded browser so awful Microsoft is trying to find something else to bundle with their embedded OS?
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    37. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Darth · · Score: 1


      I have more money than you, I will grind you into oblivion. Seems like a winning strategy to me

      unless you're a monopoly. Then it might well be illegal.

      --
      Darth --
      Nil Mortifi, Sine Lucre
    38. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say..are you the same freak that does shitty "photo-morphs" of half human-lion guys in underwear?

    39. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by alwynschoeman · · Score: 1

      I have first hand experience that Nokia will be too dense to figure it out before they are screwed.

    40. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by shione · · Score: 1

      yep version 3 is when they have enough of other companys technology to make a viable program. although if its anything like directx when they aquired opengl's key technology it could take up to 7. heh

    41. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Internet Explorer: Agreed - I can't see it benefiting MS with the exception of market share. Unless, however, there is a master plan in place to charge all those corporations/individuals royalty fees in future for embedding the IE rendering component within applications.

      That was the plan all right, but it's now essentially dead because Apache refuses give up its dominant share of the web server market. Without control of both sides of the link, Microsoft can't force netizens into using its proprietary content delivery systems. It would take force to make people use these, because they won't do it willingly, so long as the content is heavily restricted.

      Now, it's become more dangerous both in a legal and mindshare sense for Microsoft to further leverage its OS monopoly in attempts to extend control over browser content. Big defeat for Microsoft here, and a big win for the public.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    42. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      The entire purpose of Internet Explorer was to put Netscape out of business, and it did essentially that.

      That was only half the plan. The other half was to take over the client side of the web. At the same time, IIS would take over the server side, and Microsoft would hence own both sides of the communication link, and be able to coopt the protocols, "decommoditize" in Microsoft-speak. This plan was foiled by Linux, BSD and the Apache project, fortunately for the public.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    43. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      But it beats WAP by a mile. WAP is essentially sandboxed, you need to find special sites for it. Opera have a nice pocket browser, but due to the bork bork bork incident they refuse to release it on Smartphone.

      Sure, Pocket IE may not be the best around, but it can be used to access any site (except frames and flash) unlike most phones with internet capability.

    44. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Sure, and that very nice Sony model is not long out. I had a Smartphone over 6 months ago. Six months is a long time in gadget land.

      With these new phones, everything done is in software. Feature sets don't matter, because you can always get software to do what you want. In these terms,, both phones are the same, but as Smartphone is slightly more mature, there is more software available for it.

      Time will tell though. I'd like to see several phone OS's sharing the market, monopolies are bad for thoe consumer regardless of who owns them.

    45. Re:yep, that's a 1.0 product for ya by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I've never had a problem using the device as a phone, since the first update was made available. Very clear sound, it's on a GSM network, so it uses the standard GSM codecs and is identical in function to any other phone.

      Sure, the PDA functions do take a battery hit, but those extra CPU cycles demand it, as do the nice bright color TFT screens. Why carry around a laptop though when you could carry pen & paper? No battery issues there. If you like the functionality, then you live with any negatives it entails.

      I wouldn't say these phones are ready for Joe Sixpack yet. They behave more like a computer, so if you have trouble using a PC, then the phone will scare you. However, if you have geekish tendancies, I'd highly recommend looking into Smartphone or Symbian phones. Essentially you are getting a pocket computer integrated with a phone.

  4. very suspicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to admit I'm a little skeptical about it having "security problems." After all, Microsoft is very pro-security. I highly doubt it was their fault that there were security problems.

    1. Re:very suspicious by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      I have to admit I'm a little skeptical about it having "security problems." After all, Microsoft is very pro-security. I highly doubt it was their fault that there were security problems.

      Good point. I have excellent locks on my front door. If I leave them unlocked and get robbed. Not only is the robber liable for what he stole, but I am going to sue him for damages relating to the fact that he made my unlocked door known. It is HIS fault not mine!!

    2. Re:very suspicious by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The "Security" problem enabled people to hack the provisioning of the phone, during (and only during) it's first-time boot. To take advantage of it, you must do a manual hard-reset, then manually copy a file across at the right point of the boot. It wasn't easy and usually took several attempts to get right.

      When it was done, it disabled the DRM restrictions that were present at the time, allowing you to install lot's of useful unsigned programs. This is no longer required, as you can do the unlock via the telco's website yourself.

      Let's put things into perspective please. It's not an "issue" that would negatively affect someone. It benefited the end user!

    3. Re:very suspicious by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      The "Security" problem enabled people to hack the provisioning of the phone, during (and only during) it's first-time boot. To take advantage of it, you must do a manual hard-reset, then manually copy a file across at the right point of the boot. It wasn't easy and usually took several attempts to get right.

      So... then that must surely be the *only* Smartphone security problem? And I should not worry, because there's no other possible exploit for the security hole already found?

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    4. Re:very suspicious by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      So... then that must surely be the *only* Smartphone security problem?

      Of course it's not the only security problem. Anyone who thinks that any piece of complex software is 100% secure is kidding themself.

      Other next-gen phones will have issues. The Smartphone platform will have further issues. That's how it works. Until there is an OSS platform available, we will always rely on the vendor to keep up to date on the issues.

      And I should not worry, because there's no other possible exploit for the security hole already found?

      No, there is not need to worry, because as I said, you need to do it on a first time boot. To do that you need physical access to the device, docking the device with a PC at the exact moment. At the point of physical access, all security is moot in any system.

      It's been fixed anyway. The hack involved changing an XML provisioning file before it was parsed. This was done via an ActiveSync connection, and now the service for ActiveSync isn't started until the phone is provisioned.

    5. Re:very suspicious by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      Of course it's not the only security problem. Anyone who thinks that any piece of complex software is 100% secure is kidding themself.

      Other next-gen phones will have issues.


      But don't you think that Microsoft's Smartphone will have more security holes than all the others put together, and worse ones? It's a tradition, after all.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  5. Not surprised. by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last I heard you couldn't even make the phone dial a number straight out of Pocket Outlook.

    DUH.

    Something went very wrong in the QA chain between Microsoft, the 3rd parties and the mobile telcos when they were trying to rush this out.

    1. Re:Not surprised. by Wozbacca · · Score: 0

      Yes you can... The SPV is a fantastic phone. There was never any problems with the OS, only the Orange side of it. The firmware upgrade has improved performance and batterylife and its now a very good phone/pda. It's ignorance like this that inspires more anti-MS crap. You're probably one of those people who "would never touch an Xbox because its made by MS" What the hell is that about! Grow up

    2. Re:Not surprised. by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Your one sidedness is as bad as the parent poster one sidedness.

      The SPV has some definite issues. It is not comparable to other phones (eg my T68i). MS by releasing a service pack for the SPV is using a PC frame of mind when developing phones. This is just not the way things are done. Likewise with the branding where the phone is tied to the network.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    3. Re:Not surprised. by SynKKnyS · · Score: 1

      The SPV has many more features than our T68i's (already jam packed with many features). It also doesn't have horrendous speed issues like our T68i's. In any case, packing a phone with features is just asking for issues to pop up whether its a T68i or a SPV.

    4. Re:Not surprised. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Neither an SPV or a T68i even approaches the functionality or elegance of my Tungsten T & Nokia 8910 combo.

      Believe me, I've tried 'em all.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Not surprised. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There was never any problems with the OS, only the Orange side of it."

      You sure it doesn't sometimes crash and force you to turn it off and on again,losing data? A phone should *never* crash.

    6. Re:Not surprised. by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      When I visited T-Mobile to buy my Sidekick, I also checked out the Microsoft PocketPC phone they had there. I guess the phone under discussion is simply a newer version of it.

      I will admit to being heavily anti-Microsoft, but I'm also very curious about technology, so I tried to approach the phone with as open a mind as I could muster.

      It turns out that I didn't even need to muster my normal feelings about MS to hate the phone. I hated it on its merits. It is simply too clunky to use. It may have a lot of features, and I did love the nice big colour screen, but you have to put it into Phone Mode to dial, and it doesn't come up in Phone Mode, and there are all sorts of similar problems.

      Maybe the MS Smartphone is different, but I doubt that it's different enough to be any good.

      I suspect that's why companies are deserting it.

      Incidentally, it's very common for a company that wants to dump a product to say "We're delaying the release until all the bugs are fixed" or something similar. That way they can dump it without totally burning their bridges with their (former) partner. So if I were a MS phone manager, I'd take little comfort in the "postpone" versus "reject" distinction I've seen mentioned in other comments. Most likely, the MS smartphone is dead with T-Mobile.

      After all, have you ever seen a completely bug-free MS product?

      D

      PS Anyone know when the colour Sidekick is coming out? I broke mine, and I don't want to buy a new monochrome version if there's a colour one coming out. I found the monochrome display difficult to read due to too low contrast between the letters and background, and think colour would fix the problem.

    7. Re:Not surprised. by Darby · · Score: 1

      You're probably one of those people who "would never touch an Xbox because its made by MS"

      I'm not the person you're responding to, but I'll field this one. I would never touch an XBox because it's made by MS.

      What the hell is that about!
      Glad you asked!
      It's a thing called integrity. It's about having a sense of morality. It's about doing what is right over what is convenient.
      They are a criminal organization. This is an undisputed fact. It is a fact of law and part of the public record.
      So given this fact, supporting the commpany financially in any way is supporting criminal activity.
      Supporting criminal activity is not a bad thing if the law is morally vacant i.e. drug laws and the like, but there it is obvious that there is nothing redeeming in MS's criminal activities.

      So that is what it is all about.

      Grow up

      What a sad sick little person you are.
      I learned that growing up means standing up for what is right, showing courage in the face of adversity and looking out for those younger and/or weaker than you.
      You seem to be saying that growing up means giving up on morality and courage and saying "fuck you" to anybody with a scrap of integrity.

      So I am quite grown up, but you really need to learn what that means before throwing that out as an insult to anybody who actually has the courage to stand for what is right.

    8. Re:Not surprised. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      A PDA/Phone without a contrast adjustment? Seems kinda of 1980's, doesn't it?

    9. Re:Not surprised. by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      You see here is where I see things very different. The SPV has more features, AND??? So what.

      With my T68i, I have tri-band phone, that is light works for a very long time without recharging. Supports bluetooth, Syncing with PDA's and other computers. I can create notes and exchange data.

      Ok maybe most of this stuff you can do with the SPV, but on the T68i it works without large amounts of effort. I turn it on and it simply works. The SPV is simply too big and bulky and too complicated.

      This is where I see companies like Microsoft simply not getting it. It is not about packing features, but doing what you want when you want. This is why Nokia does well and why Sony Ericsson saved their butt with the t68i.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    10. Re:Not surprised. by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      I have an SPV sitting on my desk right now. It's a nice phone and the UI is no more complicated than Symbian OS.

      It does have hardware problems, though! About twice a week, the phone forgets which radio band it should use. I use 1900 MHz in my area, but the phone forgets and switches to the 900/1800 Mhz band. This causes the phone to lose all contact with the phone network. I can't place calls or use SMS. I have to go deep into the Settings menu, switch the band, and reboot the phone.

      Some people (not Microsoft employees) on the microsoft.public.smartphone.developer newsgroup said they heard this was a firmware bug. There was no news if this had been fixed in any recent firmware updates.

      What do you.. I just checked my phone and this problem JUST happened. >:-\

    11. Re:Not surprised. by korielgraculus · · Score: 1

      Actually you don't, are you sure you aren't thinking of Pocket PC Phone Edition? (A PDA with a phone built in rather than vice-versa) I own one of the Orange Smartphones and it works just great for me, you just tap in your number once the phone it turned on and off you go.

    12. Re:Not surprised. by korielgraculus · · Score: 1

      Never trust someone who tells you they are grown up. They also think you are "really really old" when you hit 30.

  6. software updates for my phone?? by CheechBG · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm sorry, but I'm not really enthused by the idea of having to download "service packs" for my cell phone to protect against some little script kiddie trying to mooch off of my free minutes, or whatever it is that he's trying to get at.

    Jesus, it's a frickin PHONE, I can see PDA's, I can see embedded OS's, but trying to cram as much as they are into a phone the size that it is then springing the Microsoftian "security through service packs" is one straw too many.

    I'll stuck with having slightly bulging pockets, thanks.

    1. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Uhh hello, I smell zealotry. The microsoft bashing has gone far enough people. seriously. What's with continually leaping on MS whenever something they're involved in doesn't quite take off? You don't know just WHY T-Mobile dumped the phone, you can only go on one or two lines from a press report. That's hardly going to give an accurate view of the story.

      Any company investing in as many projects as Microsoft is bound to have the odd knockback, it's just real life.

    2. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Zealotry? How about just the simple idea that a cellphone should be a cellphone? I don't need to play games on it. I don't need to it to check stock quotes. I don't need it to take pictures, or remind me of appointments. I need it to be able to receive and send calls, and store numbers that I regularly call. If it can do that, I don't care if it's from Microsoft or from Fred Flintstone.

      The problem is, Microsoft seems to have this problem with keeping things simple. Well, for that matter, with regards to cellphones, they're hardly alone.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    3. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about the simple idea that no one should be able to 0wn your cell phone?

      I completely agree with you. Cell phones should call people. Now, some extra functions are useful on occasion, but the vast majority of them aren't. If I wanted to send my friends E-mail from a portable device, I would either get a Blackberry or I would use a cell phone and my Newton to dial into my ISP. The only reason that I would get a cell phone is to make calls.

    4. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha.. Newton

    5. Re:software updates for my phone?? by SynKKnyS · · Score: 1

      Let's not mention all the bugs that Nokia and Siemens (and other manufacturers) have had with their phones. Remember the Nokia lock up SMS bug? Upgrading the firmware on these phones is much harder than upgrading the firmware on a SmartPhone. All phones have operating system software and all software is bound to have problems.

    6. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      U

      NO

      ZERO

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      A cellphone has been more than a cellphone for at least two years now everywhere in the world except for the US. GPRS, WAP, iMode, Java Games etc. etc. etc. Microsoft are not trying anything new, they're following SonyEricsson and, of course, Nokia.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    8. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      Newtons are great. They can interface with all sorts of modern devices with almost no problem. They have working 802.11b, ethernet, IrDA with ObEX, ATA storage cards, and almost any serial device. They have web browsers, E-mail clients, vCard capability and myriad other software options.

      Just about the only thing that hasn't been done (and probably won't) is making the Newt a USB master. That would require tons of drivers that would take quite a long time to write.

      If you want one, just go and buy one on eBay. They only cost about $100 for the latest model with tons of other cool stuff. You might also want to check out www.NewtonTalk.com.

    9. Re:software updates for my phone?? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Because I like being able to keep Microsoft products out of my life. Whenever MS enters a market, they're never content to simply be a competitor; they have to take over the market completely. The way they do business requires that they have a monopoly. So anyone who would rather not do business with Microsoft has to oppose them completely.

      I like the fact that my computers (at work and home) run Linux, my cellphone is a Motorola, and that I don't have any MS software running in my car. I want it to stay this way in the future too, but in order to do this, all of us who dislike Microsoft must oppose them as much as possible, and try to convince others to not buy their products as well. Or else we'll all be stuck with MS-powered computers, cellphones, set-top boxes, cars, power plants, and everything else, and that's a really scary vision of the future.

  7. Incorrect by m00nun1t · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is a more accurate story entitled "T-Mobile has NOT dumped MS Smartphone, just delayed it a bit".

    Also, RCR says:

    a T-Mobile spokesman said the carrier had never set a definite date, only that it would begin selling the phone sometime this summer. Spokesman Philipp Schindera said there are software problems with the phone, and that T-Mobile, manufacturer HTC and Microsoft are working to fix those problems. He said the phone has not been delayed, because there are still several months of summer left.

    1. Re:Incorrect by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

      May be the reporter has mistaken "T-Mobile's Dumb MS SmartPhone" as "T-Mobile Dumps MS SmartPhone"

    2. Re:Incorrect by silvaran · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just because the article is different doesn't make it correct and the news.com one incorrect. The article you linked to doesn't even link to the specific article from the WSJ it took the quote from. It just says, "Some quote from The Wall Street Journal." Here's a few excerpts from the news.com article:

      "We have decided not to introduce this phone,'' a T-Mobile representative said on the sidelines of a Deutsche Telekom news conference. "For the time being, we are not pursuing this project further.'

      OK, fair enough. Maybe they will later. Though they didn't confirm. And the only substantial comment in the msmobiles site (msmobiles? They couldn't be biased), is the following conjecture: Please note: "for the time being" does not mean "never".

      So right now, they've dropped it. They haven't delayed it, they aren't waiting around for Microsoft or HTC to fix anything, but "For the time being, we are not pursuing this project." So the project is stopped. They might pick it up at a later date, but they aren't just "delaying" the project as the msmobiles excerpt seems to imply.

    3. Re:Incorrect by Deviate_X · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but it is incorrect. Clarification can be found here: T-Mobile clarifies Microsoft OS handset delay rumors

      The article in full:

      ________________________________________________ ____________

      Breaking News

      T-Mobile clarifies Microsoft OS handset delay rumors

      by MIKE DANO
      May 15, 2003 1:49 PM EST

      T-Mobile International AG and Microsoft Corp. sought to clarify media reports concerning possible delays of the release of a T-Mobile phone using Microsoft software in Europe, but T-Mobile wouldn't give a specific release date.

      Media reports surfaced last week that T-Mobile had delayed the release of a phone using Microsoft's Smartphone operating system, scheduled for sale in June. However, a T-Mobile spokesman said the carrier had never set a definite date, only that it would begin selling the phone sometime this summer. Spokesman Philipp Schindera said there are software problems with the phone, and that T-Mobile, manufacturer HTC and Microsoft are working to fix those problems. He said the phone has not been delayed, because there are still several months of summer left.

      Such tactics are common in the wireless industry, with many wireless players shying away from specific release dates.

      However, T-Mobile's Schindera wouldn't say when the phone would be released, only that it would be released when all the software glitches are fixed. Schindera also said T-Mobile's partnership with Microsoft is still sound and the software problems are commonplace for high-end devices, such as those using Microsoft Smartphone software.

      Microsoft has been working since the late 1990s to sell mobile phones using its Smartphone software. The company first signed up mobile-phone start-up Sendo to make its smart phones, but Sendo a year ago abruptly dropped those plans and later filed a lawsuit against Microsoft. As a result, Microsoft has managed to line up several Asian manufacturers to build Smartphone devices.

      Orange was the first carrier in the world to start selling a device using the Microsoft Smartphone OS late last year. As of about February, the European carrier said it had sold 40,000 of the devices. In the United States, several carriers sell wireless personal digital assistants that use Microsoft's Pocket PC operating system, but none so far have begun selling Smartphone devices. AT&T Wireless Services Inc. plans to sell a Smartphone device by the end of this year and confirmed those plans have not changed.

    4. Re:Incorrect by haggar · · Score: 1

      msmobiles.com ? You must be fucking kidding. That site is practically a MS mouthpiece, but without even a limited reason.

      The website is considered a complete joke by all the wireless professionals in Finland because of the Comical Ali kind of spin.

      --
      Sigged!
  8. Yeah patch it cowboy by jsse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It initially had software security problems which Microsoft has claimed are patched."

    Yeah, connect your smartphone to the SmartWindowsUpdate via GPRS. It only takes about several megabytes(every week) of download(yes in fact that's entire OS replacement) and in view of the present strikely *low* GPRS rate (US$1/kbyte) it won't be too much hassle, will it? :)

    1. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by sxpert · · Score: 1

      don't forget that upgrading the OS restores the thing to factory condition, and all your data is gone ;-)

    2. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by lokedhs · · Score: 1

      I think you got your currency conversion wrong somewhere... Either that or the US prices for GPRS are absurd. You're telling me that you're paying 1000 USD per MB? I'm sorry, not even the US could have those kinds of prices. I have a very expensive GPRS subscription, and my price is approximately 0.01 USD (that's one cent) per KB.

    3. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by Wozbacca · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wrong, When you update, all user data is retained. Even if for some reason it did lose it all, you can backup/restore to the SD memory card, your pc via active sync, or via gprs to Orange Backup! GPRS is free for SPV users as part of the promotion pack. Get your facts straight!

    4. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know if he had the rate correct but I wouldn't be suprised if he did.

      Do you know what sending an SMS costs here in the US? It's actually cheaper to just call there person for five minutes than to send a few messages back an forth.

      I know, it defies all logic. SMS's are so many orders of magnitude less of a burden on the network, yet they cost more. The cell phone system here is insane.

      People in Europe have it pretty good, but the Japanese are the ones who get all the really cool stuff. If I was in Japan I could use a Sharp Zaurus as my phone and have VOIP + continuous net access.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    5. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What idiot modded this guy up?

      Check his user info. He only has 3 comments, ever. All of them in this thread about how great the MS smart phone is and how "Smartphone is a brilliant OS."

      Sounds like a rabid MS fanboy or an astroturfer to me.

      Here is a link to some user reviews of this phone. In particular, note the user reviews which describe these updates which he claimed just increase efficiency, are actually necessary to keep the phone from crashing all the time.

      This is my favorite quote from his postings:
      "There was never any problems with the OS, only the Orange side of it. The firmware upgrade has improved performance and batterylife and its now a very good phone/pda."

      Funny, it seems everyone else's smartphone crashes but his. Maybe he got a magic phone.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    6. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by lokedhs · · Score: 1
      Well, UMTS has arrived in Europe now. It's still fairly expensive[1] but the functionality is there.

      [1] Nowhere near 1 USD/KB though.

    7. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In particular, note the user reviews which describe these updates which he claimed just increase efficiency, are actually necessary to keep the phone from crashing all the time."

      But. Isn't the the Microsoft Defnition(tm) of increasing efficiency?

    8. Re:Yeah patch it cowboy by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      What idiot modded this guy up?

      Well, of course if you're a pro Astroturfer you get your astroturfer friends to mod you up, or use your alternate accounts. Whatever. In a business sense, the astroturfers are a big win for Slashdot, since they create traffic, and lots of it. Unfortunately for Microsoft, that traffic tends to be overwhelmingly negative, and rich with interesting information supplied by clueful people, exposing various seamy strategies to unwelcome scrutiny. So astroturfing Slashdot is a self-defeating strategy for Microsoft.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  9. ... But they don't need a carrier to approve them by sasha328 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have seen a MS smart phone being demoed at a recent MS product launch here in Sydney. The phone, apart from working as a standard GSM mobile, uses a GPRS internet connection to also connect to an exchange server (best with MSX 2003). (again this is carrier independent) Besides, for those who have used the XDA (a WINCE with mobile built in) can tell that the difference is only superficial, from a distance anyway)
    So, I not exactly sure what this news is all about. It's probably in relation to launching the phone with some extra value-added services usable only with the smartphone.
    I wouldn't read too much into it.

  10. MS Responds by petecarlson · · Score: 3, Funny

    According to a study done by our crack research team, people like the color blue. That blue screen they keep talking about is not a reliability problem, it's a feature.

    1. Re:MS Responds by akpcep · · Score: 1, Funny

      If their research team is on crack, they have more than security issues to worry about.

      --
      Hmmm.
  11. Is there anything MS doesn't make? by Photar · · Score: 1

    From cellular telephones to console video games to Operating systems. Is there anything they don't make?

    Also, the microsoft phones sucking isn't a big surprise. Microsofts M.O. seems to be to release complete crap, get everyones expectations lowered, and when they finally get a good prodcut 5 or 10 years down the road, everyone says look how far they've come!

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    1. Re:Is there anything MS doesn't make? by G27+Radio · · Score: 3, Funny

      From cellular telephones to console video games to Operating systems. Is there anything they don't make?

      It's a little know fact that Microsoft used to make vacuum cleaners. In fact, it was the first product they made that didn't suck.

      Ugh, I'm probably gonna regret that tomorrow.

    2. Re:Is there anything MS doesn't make? by The+Fanta+Menace · · Score: 1

      From cellular telephones to console video games to Operating systems. Is there anything they don't make?

      Yeah. Stable software.

      --
      -- Even if a god did exist, why the fsck should I worship it?
    3. Re:Is there anything MS doesn't make? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Traf-O-Data? The first business venture by Gates/Allen. It used an 8008 to count cars running over a piece of rubber.

  12. [ot] When your trolls reach +5 funny, that's by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    when you'll know it's time to resign yourself to being a slahsbot.

    At least you've still got +3 points to go. There's still hope! RUN while you STILL CAN!

    1. Re:[ot] When your trolls reach +5 funny, that's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I'm a recovering slashbot with 150+ karma so I know what it's like. BTW, I'm also responsible for that classy first post too. Today must be my lucky day.

  13. Where do you want to go today. by VTS · · Score: 1, Funny

    Industry insiders say that the software for the phone continued to have 'fundamental problems,' leading to a high failure rate.
    It initially had software security problems which Microsoft has claimed are patched.


    But are those things REALLY bad from a marketing point of view? Everyone who uses MS products would feel right at home!

    --
    --- No 16-bit support in Vista? Half of our modules still use it! ---
  14. Xbox? by lpret · · Score: 0, Funny

    Do you think the XBox will follow this too? I mean, it seems to be doing decently now (probably #2?) so I can only imagine what a 3rd version of it will do.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  15. ERROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "hi mom" *CLICK*

    Your phone has crashed, please restart and run disk check up before using your MSPhone again Error 8H

    1. Re:ERROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      It's chkdsk you fucking hippy.

    2. Re:ERROR by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 1

      My mobile phone in Japan about three years ago (a Panasonic on J-Phone for what it's worth) actually did crash while I was typing a message. It just froze.

      The only way I could recover it was to remove the battery - but after replacing it, it had lost all its settings.

      I'm sure that the software in that phone was a lot simpler - I'm sure that anything programmed by Microsoft is just a disaster waiting to happen.

      --
      If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
    3. Re:ERROR by Keeper · · Score: 1

      ...because we all know that the reason you'll be disconnected from a conversion is because the cell phone crashes, and not because the cell company dropped the connection...

  16. Re:it figures...... (off topic) by akpcep · · Score: 0, Troll

    Salient points, but you're wasting your time. American fear and jingoism negate actual fact every single time.

    --
    Hmmm.
  17. msmobiles, Iraqi info. minister and the US ..... by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    At the end of the msmobiles article:
    " Make no mistake: Microsoft is on track to enter cell phone industry big time, and these initial teething problems will be soon over. "

    The style is reminescent of perpared speeches and a certain Al-Shaf. Interesting.

    http://msmobiles.com/news.php/720.html

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  18. Guilty of WrongThink by CaptainZapp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Microsoft made a huge conceptual error in believing that they can cram their Windows Everything philosophy into a cell phone.

    Cell phones require far more resilience then organizers or pocket PCs. For example: Compare the Treo to the Nokia Communicator. While the second is designed as a cell phone with added functionality, the first is primarily an organizer with crammed in phone functionality. I know a number of happy Communicator users, while the number of happy Treo users I know of is precisely zero.

    In addition embrace and extend is a philopsophy, which rightfully has zero credibility in the phone business. It's all about (meticulously respected) standards.

    --
    ich bin der musikant

    mit taschenrechner in der hand

    kraftwerk

    1. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      But hey, at least MS-based cell phones don't give you cancer!

    2. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 1

      Make that one happy Treo user.

      Seriously though, the phone is weak - I'm only happy because I done't use it a lot. I can't wait until someone introduces a well integrated Palm OS 5 smartphone and I can have an MP3 player, phone and palm in one gadget.

    3. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by pangloss · · Score: 1

      like this?

      it's the samsung sgh-i500, not to be confused with the sph-i500. looks sweet.

      i am a little skeptical of the palmos 5 business. a lot of ppl criticized the new kyocera 7135 for coming out so late with only palmos 4 support. but palmos 4 means a less power-hungry processor, which translates into better battery life--critical for a phone. but if samsung can pull it off with this new phone, i'm all over it. of course we may not see it for a long long time.

    4. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to debunk this.

      I am a happy treo user, and know of 4 more in my company.

      There are things the treo could have made better but
      that is always the case.

      My guess is that we see the 2 roads (phone and organizers) converge in the future.
      /C

    5. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you get MS instead.

    6. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by jagnich · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really? I support mobile devices for my company, and the only thing people use Communicators for here is self defense. The only redeeming value of them is an excellent speakerphone. Treos, on the other hand, do quite well, both as a cell phone and a very simple OS.

      Second, having used a demo Smartphone for about 2 months, it does a pretty good job of being a phone and a very good job of being a PDA. I've enjoyed using it, except that the battery doesn't last long enough.

      Also, I'm pretty tired of it blue-screening when I hang up the phone. Seriously.

    7. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by klui · · Score: 1

      Something like the Kyocera 7135? Says it's Palm OS, but not what version. I saw one in real life but it is too big. PC Magazine had a writeup on it and it looked fine, but the thing is just too wide. At $499, it's not a very good deal. People switch phones once a year or once every two years or so. What about PDAs? Maybe once every 2-3 years. Once you buy it, there will be new stuff out in 6 months. If I were a gadget freak, I would want the best phone or PDA with no compromising products that included both.

    8. Re:Guilty of WrongThink by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      While Telco's and MS do have a Similar Mindset when it comes to somethings.. Its does not mean MS should get into Telecomunications products... Both MS and Telco's have the same mindset as you Maintaining thier dominace over the marketplace and screw anyone that tries to pry money out of thier cash cows by what ever means is at the disposal. But Telco's (for the large part) have a stable product... When was the last time you had to reboot your phone to make a phone call.. Or head a couple Telco techs talking... "So how did you fix that Biug outtage last night bob?"... "I just rebooted the switches and it started working again"..... Only in the MS world that has become Plauseable in the troubleshooting process.. Not only that.. But as a resolution?!?! Come on? get real! The problem is still there! thats nothing more than tossing a bandaide on it. Its still broken...

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  19. Symbian by theLOUDroom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As the ex-owner of a Psion Revo+ (replaced with a Zaurus), I will say that I expect symbian to dominate the cellphone market.

    The Symbian OS (formerly known as EPOC) was designed from the ground up for small devices with small screens. Even the older version that my Revo ran was more feature-rich and polished than any other PDA OS I've touched. Most importantly (for cellphone use) the OS itself was rock solid. I can't remember a single time when I was forced to reboot.

    Simply put, Microsoft is offering too little, too late. Most of the major cellphone manufacturers has signed on for Symbian.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
    1. Re:Symbian by Troed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was an employee at Symbian, I read about the (then) current record. One woman (I believe) had used her Psion Series 5 for 1.5 years without a single reboot.

    2. Re:Symbian by infiniti99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yup, Symbian rocks. The Psion Revo was a very cool PDA. The whole thing felt solid, and the apps worked nicely. Its email application was the best I've used on a PDA yet, and the GSM phone sync software was quite handy (I used to backup my phone on the Revo, and backup my Revo on my laptop :) ). Internet access via IR cellphone, telnet client, Opera web browser, what more could you want? It's a shame it was a minority product here in the USA. I guess no one likes PDAs with keyboards?

      Like you, now I have a Zaurus, which is an improvement over the Revo in just about every way possible, except now in a vertical form-factor (arguably also an improvement). My only complaint is the battery life. The apps could use some work, but the development environment on the Zaurus is just so damn cool (it don't get any better than Linux + Qt, folks), that I'm sure the apps will greatly improve over time. I just hope the product survives. Probably one of the reasons Psion died out in the USA is because of Palm/PocketPC dominance.

    3. Re:Symbian by simp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reboot a Psion 5? What are you talking about? I've never had to reboot a Psion 5. The only problem with these things is hardwarefailure due to user error, ie dropping it on a concrete floor.

      Epoc is the most stable OS I've ever used. And as an organizer a Psion has one of the best usable aganda/database/spreadsheet applications, compared to other organizers (Palm/pocketpc).

    4. Re:Symbian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are kidding right? I have a Sony Ericsson P800 which crashes every now and then. It seems more prominent when bluetooth is on. I have actually seen a call come in which caused it to crash before actually ringing. When it does crash you have to hold the power button down for 10 seconds and then power up. Nice phone but the crashing is darn annoying.

    5. Re:Symbian by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Speaking of improved apps....did you know that Sharp just yesterday released a ROM update for the Zaurus?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    6. Re:Symbian by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1
      The Symbian OS (formerly known as EPOC) was designed from the ground up for small devices with small screens.
      Bill Gates has always bet on Moore's Law, and has always won. And yes, that's a quote, but I can't attribute it.
    7. Re:Symbian by theLOUDroom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IMHO Bill G is not successful because he is a visionary in the computing field.

      Bill Gates is successful because he is a good businessman. I once got curious and did a little research on the worlds richest people. Know what all of those who made their own money seem to have in common? Insane business sense/craftiness. The ability to work deals that just make others shake their heads. He knows how to work the system for all it's worth.


      Bill Gates has always bet on Moore's Law, and has always won.

      MS has never really worried about beating competitors spec-wise, not because of Moore's Law, but because they beat them other (often illegal) ways. If doesn't matter if the other guy's software is better, if you control the OS that everyone uses. All you have to do is develop/buy your own and bundle it with your OS. Instant market share. You make money because you just charge more for the OS to recover the cost, while the other company dies. Why is anyone going to buy a competitor's product (for additional cost), when the already have the MS equivalent?


      Now, back on topic: MS can't use this tactic to get WinCE on cellphones. This means they have to compete on a (somewhat) level playing-field. Since their software is currently inferior to Symbian OS for smartphone use, I predict they will loose. By the time WinCE is stable enough, it will be too late, another OS will have already become the standard.

      The only way I can see MS really making it in the embedded OS field is if they take huge losses, basically giving their stuff away, until they get market share. They definately have the money to do this, but even so, they may not get anywhere. Even if they charge $0, they still have to compete with embedded Linux at the same price point. With Linux, companies know that they will always be able to redistribute it royalty-free. They also know that, at some point, MS is going to want to make back the money the spent developing WinCE, so they will get charged for it eventually.

      Meanwhile:
      Symbian is owned by Ericsson, Panasonic, Motorola, Nokia, Psion, Samsung, Siemens and Sony Ericsson.

      That's basically all the major cellphone manufacturers. Since they all own the OS, they know they're getting their OS just about as cheap as possible anyways, as well as knowing that they have control over it in the future.

      Since their cellphones are already the standard, one can be pretty sure that whatever OS they choose to put on them will also become the standard. Just like MS choosing IE.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    8. Re:Symbian by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right, I hope so. I was just replying to the specific point that Symbian is designed to run on low-resource systems (small devices, small screens). These restrictions will go away, leaving Symbian with one less advantage. Maybe it will still win.

    9. Re:Symbian by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can see your reasoning that this advantage might diappear. Maybe it will, but there it a chance that it could stay an advantage for quite some time to come. It's actually a pretty neat concept.

      Power consumption in CMOS logic is directly proportional to your clock speed, and how many transistors you have switching. This is proportional to how much computing you're doing. If your OS requires less computation to run, you use less power, and your battery lasts longer than the competition's.

      Maybe Moore's Law will double the amount of CPU power availible in a PDA, but if your OS only needs half of that, your battery life is going to be double your competition's.

      This isn't quite true due to the other components in the device that draw a fixed amount of power to keep them running (backlight for example), but power usage by the CPU is a significant factor in the battery life of most PDAs.


      Anyways, the reason I was pointing out that Symbian OS was designed to run on small devices was not hardware requirements, but UI design. There are nice touches in the way they did Symbian OS that let it use the tiny screen more efficiently than a PocketPC.

      For example, there's a menu button which hides/unhides the menu at the top of the window, in all applications. That's 10% more screen availible most of the time. It's also very easy to hide the taskbar as well.

      In general, the UI was designed for a small screen, instead of trying to shrink the Windows UI. This is nice, because you can get more out of the small physical size of the screen.

      I'm pretty optimistic about the whole Symbian thing because of things like this. It's just too bad Psion isn't in the PDA business anymore.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    10. Re:Symbian by Troed · · Score: 1

      Upgrade it - there's new (and much improved) software released since just a week ago or so.

    11. Re:Symbian by pmz · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates is successful because he is a good businessman.

      No, he is a very smart and cunning business man.

      He knows how to work the system for all it's worth.

      Agreed.

      This means they have to compete on a (somewhat) level playing-field.

      Yes, because phone customers couldn't care less what brand of OS kernel runs on what is, essentially, a black box. Cell phones are appliances that come with advertised features for an advertised price. Buying a cell phone and a calling plan is more similar to buying a washing machine than it is to buying a PC.

      However, if Microsoft can change the rules by, perhaps, infecting the communications protocols used by cell phones, then all bets are off for a healthy cell phone market. I'm just glad that this scenario is so unlikely.

    12. Re:Symbian by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      In general, the UI was designed for a small screen, instead of trying to shrink the Windows UI. This is nice, because you can get more out of the small physical size of the screen.


      The Smartphone UI is not like the Windows desktop or Pocket PC UIs. It is specifically designed for the phone. It's no more complicated than the Symbian UI. In fact, the Smartphone has some nice shortcuts where you can use the number keypad to select menu items without having to scroll down through the entire menu.

    13. Re:Symbian by korielgraculus · · Score: 1
      Since their software is currently inferior to Symbian OS for smartphone use

      Sorry, I can't agree. Used both and I don't personally feel that the smartphone software is in any way inferior to Symbian. Different certainly, but not inferior.

    14. Re:Symbian by alwynschoeman · · Score: 1

      You do not get it. Microsoft gives a shit about major cellphone manufacturers, they are using cheap manufacturers in Asia to mass produce these phones. Most desktop user do not care about what brand their computer hardware is but just that they can run Windows on it. They plan to do a Netscape on all major phone manufactures, not be partners with them...

  20. here's another Microsoft embedded device by g4dget · · Score: 4, Funny
    Microsoft Windows is not just in phones but also in cars. Just imagine the possibilities when it also runs your Disposall, electric toothbrush, hair dryer, and microwave:

    BANGKOK (Reuters) - Security guards smashed their way into an official limousine with sledgehammers on Monday to rescue Thailand's finance minister after his car's computer failed.

    Suchart Jaovisidha and his driver were trapped inside the BMW for more than 10 minutes before guards broke a window. All doors and windows had locked automatically when the computer crashed, and the air conditioning stopped, officials said.

    "We could hardly breathe for over 10 minutes," Suchart told reporters. "It took my guard a long time to realize that we really wanted the window smashed so that we could crawl out. It was a harrowing experience."

    From Reuters

    Here is Microsoft's proud announcement of their partnership with BMW.

    1. Re:here's another Microsoft embedded device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just when I was thinking about a BMW with the next month bonus. Thanks folks.

  21. Great... by Mudcathi · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... just when I was looking sooooo forward to getting the blue screen of death while on the road!

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  22. Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by rseuhs · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The days of big Microsoft advances are over.

    First, MS has only been successful in things that they can bind to Windows (prime example is MS Office which generates about 40% of MS revenues, a phyrric victory is IE which generates no revenue but was also pushed by the Windows domination), everything else is losing money.

    All the following projects have been canceled:


    - Windows/Mips
    - Windows/PowerPC
    - Windows/Alpha
    - "HomeR" Project
    - Modular Windows
    - "Otto" Project (SW for cars; 1992)
    - MMOSA (Set-Top-boxes Operating System
    - WebTV
    - Blackbird/Internet Studio (1995)
    - proprietary MSN (Microsoft should have become the sole ISP, remember?)
    - COOl (C++ Object Orientated Language)
    - PenWindows
    - Microsoft Bob
    - Ultimate TV
    - Hailstorm (2001 - 2002)

    Those projects are losing money:


    - XBox (revenues declined by 40% in Q1 2003, losses nearly doubled (+96%) http://www.golem.de/showhigh.php?file=/0305/25460. html&wort[]=xbox sorry, link is in German)
    - Non-proprietary MSN
    - Mice, keyboards
    - Cell phone OS (Stinger)

    I don't know where all the "MS will win automatically" people crawl from, if you look at their track record, they have lots and lots of unsuccessful projects.

    If you look at the big picture, MS is currently being stripped off everything except their core business (x86-desktop). And wether MS is really able to make the 64-Bit transition is questionable. They are so incompetent in producing something 64Bit that they will lose a lot of people to Linux/Athlon64, even on the desktop.

    In the non-graphic embedded market, Linux is already the standard, on cellphones Symbian is the standard and Linux is coming, leaves only PDAs, where Microsoft is still holding out (but there Linux is coming, too).

    1. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What was "cool" became publicly known as C#, and it seems to still be alive...

    2. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What was "cool" became publicly known as C#, and it seems to still be alive...

      C# was the answer to Java.
      C# was geared towards C++ developers who were migrating to Java
      C# was NOT derived from CooL project
    3. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by MonTemplar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The days of big Microsoft advances are over.

      First, MS has only been successful in things that they can bind to Windows (prime example is MS Office which generates about 40% of MS revenues, a phyrric victory is IE which generates no revenue but was also pushed by the Windows domination), everything else is losing money.


      No argument there.

      All the following projects have been canceled:

      - Windows/Mips
      - Windows/PowerPC
      - Windows/Alpha
      - "HomeR" Project
      - Modular Windows
      - "Otto" Project (SW for cars; 1992)
      - MMOSA (Set-Top-boxes Operating System
      - WebTV
      - Blackbird/Internet Studio (1995)
      - proprietary MSN (Microsoft should have become the sole ISP, remember?)
      - COOl (C++ Object Orientated Language)
      - PenWindows
      - Microsoft Bob
      - Ultimate TV
      - Hailstorm (2001 - 2002)


      Most of these were not so much products, but rather blocking moves by MS, designed to head off possible threats to the Windows cash-cow. Admittedly, some of them were better thought out than others. *grin* PenWindows did succeed in its real purpose, that of stopping Go Corp from building a viable competitor to Windows for what was at the time thought to be the Next Big Thing. Other products you mention have been recycled into other projects - COOL eventually became C#, while Internet Studio's technology found its way into Microsoft's development tools, particularly Visual Interdev.

      If you look at the big picture, MS is currently being stripped off everything except their core business (x86-desktop). And wether MS is really able to make the 64-Bit transition is questionable. They are so incompetent in producing something 64Bit that they will lose a lot of people to Linux/Athlon64, even on the desktop.

      Based on past history, the deciding factor will not be whether or not Microsoft succeeds, but rather whether or not the competition falters or dithers long enough for Microsoft to come through with a credible bodge-job that can woo potential customers.

      --
      -MT.
    4. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      All the following projects have been canceled:

      - "HomeR" Project


      D'oH!
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    5. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Based on past history, the deciding factor will not be whether or not Microsoft succeeds, but rather whether or not the competition falters or dithers long enough for Microsoft to come through with a credible bodge-job that can woo potential customers.

      Well, the rules have changed. When Intel made the 16 to 32 Bit transition, Microsoft was too incompetent to supply a 32Bit OS for half a decade. But there was basically no 32Bit alternative to MS DOS and later Windows on x86, so Microsoft got away with their incompetence.

      Now things are different. Linux is a viable alternative for many tasks and SuSE has already finished the Opteron port. Linux will not only available for x86-64, it will be the *first* OS available (never happened before: Linux was always late on the market - not this time) and Linux will be officially supported by AMD.

      On servers, this will hurt MS a lot and Linux will be #1 on servers within 3 years from now because the situation on Itanium is similar.

      Sure, Linux will not take Windows' place on the desktop after the 64-Bit transition, but I think it is realistic that Linux will go from neglectible marketshare to significant (maybe 10% - 20%), which will be enough for hardware makers to support it by themselves.

    6. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Symbian is the standard and Linux is coming, leaves only PDAs, where Microsoft is still holding out

      I just ordered a Sharp Zaurus from TigerDirect.com. I've been reading up on it a lot, and it seems to have a pretty damn big following. People are porting TONS of the COOLEST Java and Linux apps to it, so it's got a major abuncance of software out there. The OS itself is GPL'd. Does anyone know if it's a specific distro?

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    7. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      It's a custom Embedix based distro.

    8. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      All the following projects have been canceled:
      - Windows/Mips
      - Windows/PowerPC
      - Windows/Alpha


      These are a bit of a chicken & the egg type of thing. How many of these platforms are doing any better without Windows than they were with it?

      - "HomeR" Project
      - Modular Windows


      I'm not sure which HomeR you're talking about, because I would hope MS still has a stress tool for IIS sites... As for Modular Windows, I thought that's what PocketPC, XBox, etc were all using...

      - "Otto" Project (SW for cars; 1992)
      - MMOSA (Set-Top-boxes Operating System
      - WebTV


      Software for cars is something MS is still working on, unless this was cancelled in the last 2 months. WebTV and MMOSA are pretty much the same thing, but MMOSA could be considered part of either XBox or WebTV, and WebTV has been rebranded to take the MSN name (they're advertising MSN set-top internet access on TV here in VA).

      - Blackbird/Internet Studio (1995)
      - proprietary MSN (Microsoft should have become the sole ISP, remember?)
      - COOl (C++ Object Orientated Language)


      The first two items are pretty much the same thing, while COOL is C#, which is doing exceptionally well.

      - PenWindows
      - Microsoft Bob


      Given, this was how long ago?

      - Ultimate TV

      http://www.ultimatetv.com/index.asp
      Spring 2003 Service Upgrades available...

      - Hailstorm (2001 - 2002)

      And we all know that Hailstorm was so popular that they'd have no reason to rename it (.Net My Services) and then just bury it until it's ready.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    9. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
      - Hailstorm (2001 - 2002)

      Last time I checked, Hailstorm was still very much alive, but buried deep within the company. It's still gestating, developing, until the market is ready. They aren't forgetting how lucrative the market for personal services could be. You just wait and see.

    10. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know where all the "MS will win automatically" people crawl from, if you look at their track record, they have lots and lots of unsuccessful projects.

      Probably from under some rock in Seattle. All of this Guys comments fall into these 4 easy categories

      1) "...Yep, MS-product XYZ may be crap but, watch out for version 3 ... ".

      2) "...Yes, MS-product XYZ does support PQR, I have it on a shelf in front of me ... ".

      3) "...I have a 'NON-MS-Product' and the a' MS-Product XYZ is better ...".

      4) "... Download this MS-Software product patch from 'Some MS-Web Site' ".

      If you dont believe me check it out, here if it wasnt so obvious astroturfing it would be truely sad.

    11. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by peaworth · · Score: 1

      Much of MS's dominance on the desktop (as well as everywhere else that they are dominant) is based on the typical FUD. People believe that there is no viable alternative, the alternatives are too difficult to deal with, etc.

      Once the breakthrough is made and you see larger manufacturers pre-installing and supporting other choices (ie Linux) on new desktops (and laptops), the situation will snowball because the systems will be competing on more equivalencies. Most of the Linux reviews aimed towards the more mainstream audience dicuss mostly the ease (or not) of installation. When is the last time you saw any sort of MS Windows review that discussed how easy it was to install? MS Windows has its own installation quirks, but very few ever see that.

      Once over the barrier to entry hump, things could go very well.

    12. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by IDIIAMOTS · · Score: 1

      I think Windows XP was released in 64-bit flavor shortly after 32-bit version was launched. So that's late 2001/early 2002. Last month, Microsoft released 64-bit ports of Windows Server 2003 and SQL 2000. Now I'm not aware how much 64-bit Intel and AMD machines are used in the real world at the moment, but I would argue that Linux isn't the *first* OS available on x86-64.

    13. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peaworth,

      You make a very good point. A great deal of reluctance to "running" Linux, isn't necessarily about running Linux. Many of the newest users of PC's have never had to deal with installing and configuring their PC's due to preloaded OS's.

      However, if that situation ever changes and you have preloaded Linux, beyond Lindows.com and Wal-mart PC's, you could potentially see the bubble burst.

      I appreciate the points you made, I found them insightful.

    14. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by RoLi · · Score: 1
      First, all those "64-Bit" ports were for Itanium and won't even run on Opteron. Currently there is not a single Microsoft product optimized for Opteron. With SuSE's Opteron Linux being available and other distros underway (AFAIK Gentoo and debian should be ready about now), it is safe to say that Linux is indeed first on Opteron.

      Second, we all know how Microsoft's 64-Bit ports are. Windows/Alpha was pretty much a 32 Bit OS running on a 64 Bit CPU. The complete lack of reviews and benchmarks about 64Bit Windows does make me very suspicious about their offerings. Both Itanium and Opteron are backwards-compatible, I just wonder how much of their 64-Bit version is in reality just the same old code.

    15. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by atlasheavy · · Score: 1

      Fact: the average company cancels at least half of their projects.

      A lot of projects are unsuccessful. This is true for Microsoft (Bob, Ultimate TV), Apple (G4 Cube, Newton, that weird Bandai video game system), and every other company out there.

      How many open source projects get abandoned, or languish in obscurity?

      Also, just for the record, COOL is C#. Thought you should know.

      --

      iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    16. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox is losing revenues? That is a mixed bag depending on how you look at it. If you look at current game sales, it may not be as big as the PS2 but it is continously killing the GameCube in sales and marketshare. Calling that a failure is just a stupid comment on your behalf.

    17. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does losing money equate to an "unsuccessful project"? Plenty of businesses are created to lose money on purpose. Microsoft is actually a business alias for the Treasury Department. They are responsible for the new colors of the $20 bill. And if you think about it, making money is just as bad as losing money, except you pay taxes.

    18. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by rseuhs · · Score: 1
      A lot of projects are unsuccessful. This is true for Microsoft, Apple, and every other company out there.

      Congratulations. That was my point.

      Microsoft's projects are not immune to failure just like everybody elses.

    19. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by cpeterso · · Score: 1

      Many of Microsoft's most successful products are acquisitions. There is some speculation that even .NET/CLR was not developed in-house by Microsoft, but acquired from a startup company called Colusa:

      History Of C#

      .NET CLR is based on Colusa software's language-neutral OmniVM, a part of their Omniware product. OmniVM was based on research carried out by Steven Lucco at Carnegie Mellon University. Steven co-founded Colusa Software in February 1994 in Berkeley, California. Omniware was released in August 1995. Colusa started working with Microsoft in February 1996. Microsoft acquired Colusa Software on March 12, 1996. Steven is currently a senior researcher at the Microsoft Bay Area Research Center.

      OmniVM was appealing to Microsoft because Colusa had already created Visual Basic and C/C++ development environments for the VM. The VM was also claimed to be capable of running Java. Microsoft took to calling the VM by the name of CVM, presumably for Colusa Virtual Machine. Or perhaps this is where the code name Cool came into being. Other names used at Microsoft include Universal Virtual Machine (UVM), and Intermediate Language (IL).

      Microsoft denies rumors that C# went by the code name Cool, however there have been many apparent slip-ups by Microsoft employees where the word Cool is used in code snippets, file paths, etc.

    20. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Enraged_jawa · · Score: 1

      All the following projects have been canceled: - Windows/Mips - Windows/PowerPC - Windows/Alpha - "HomeR" Project - Modular Windows - "Otto" Project (SW for cars; 1992) - MMOSA (Set-Top-boxes Operating System - WebTV - Blackbird/Internet Studio (1995) - proprietary MSN (Microsoft should have become the sole ISP, remember?) - COOl (C++ Object Orientated Language) - PenWindows - Microsoft Bob - Ultimate TV - Hailstorm (2001 - 2002)

      You forgot the I-loo..

    21. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC Linux for the Itanium was running on simulators months before Intel released engineering samples.

    22. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by atlasheavy · · Score: 1

      please do bear in mind that each of those comments has been posted on my Powerbook G4 running Mac OS X.

      I am just about as platform agnostic as you can get. I try to use the right tool for the job. The fact is that, typically speaking, I find that a version 3.0 product from MS is the right choice for the job.

      And the reason I comment so much on MS stuff is because I happen to know a hell of a lot about it. I've spent the last year getting paid to know a hell of a lot about it. Slashdot has a bajillion people who know just about everything there is to know with Linux and BSD. There appears to be an unfortunate dearth of individuals who know a lot about MS tech. Those who do get whacked around for astroturfing or trolling.

      Honestly, I hope that the OSS movement produces a desktop that is very usable (in the Nielsen/Raskin/Spolsky sense). I want to see Apple and Microsoft actually have competition that they can't undercut on price. It would make the computing world a much better place.

      My primary interest in computer science is in HCI and usability. This is the lens I examine just about everything through. Typically, when I am critical of something it is for a usability reason (or because the thing in question is just stupid, but that's another story).

      And I didn't crawl out from under a rock in Seattle. More like one in Minnesota (hence the U of Minnesota thing).

      Cheers,
      Aaron

      --

      iRooster, the Mac OS X a
    23. Re:Without the PC, Microsoft is helpless by gidds · · Score: 1

      Yep. And they don't have long at all this time around. Symbian is hardly a new kid on the block - their OS, for example, has been in development for the best part of a decade, and is on its seventh generation already. M$ can throw money and FUD, but they'll have a hard time matching Symbian's experience and mindshare amongst all the mobile phone manufacturers.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  23. Re:The end of civilization as we know it? by Tony-A · · Score: 0

    It is funny.
    Microsoft's security is hilarious. Laugh.

  24. Damian Hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Orange SPV has not been 'hacked'," Hack wrote.
    What a great name for a programmer..

  25. Re:msmobiles, Iraqi info. minister and the US .... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
    " At the end of the msmobiles article:
    " Make no mistake: Microsoft is on track to enter cell phone industry big time, and these initial teething problems will be soon over. "

    The style is reminescent of perpared speeches and a certain Al-Shaf. Interesting."



    Microsoft said the same thing with WindowsCE later renamed Windows-powered devices. Look now?

    The palm folks laughed but look at palms stock price now? It was $.80 a share the last time I looked! MS took over 75% of the market in less then 2 years! NT and IE owned little if any market share when they first came out. Now look? What about VisualC++? They were nothing compared to Borland and in the mid 90's they just gobbled the market by bundling it with VB also known as MSDN. MSDN is just a fancy name for the VB and VC bundle which was name changed to fool the DOJ. It worked!

    The examples go on and on. Eventually MS will get it right and monopolize the market. Bill Gates has an obession with this.

    Remember this is Microsoft. They and not the industry set the standards. This is rumoured to even be in Microsoft's mission statement. I do not know if this is true but it certianly sounds like it. Sadly this is true. Anything standard made without bill's or Steve's approval infuriates them to no end. They are crazy.

  26. Re:Mod UP! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
    I thought this was a lame joke but its real. Just follow both links. Especially the bottum one. lol

  27. why do they have problems? by vistic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm confused.

    I underatand why Microsoft's operating systems and word processors and stuff might be buggy: they have to provide legacy support and the hardware configurations can be complex.

    However, considering their resources and (I'm assuming) talent... shouldn't they be able to do something like this and have it be pretty sound technology?

    I think nowadays even to non-technical people, Microsoft has come to symbolize a product that will work but also let you down in so many ways in terms of quality, security, bugs, price, etc.

    1. Re:why do they have problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not - they're used to having a monopoly and have never needed to get anything right first time. It's no wonder their quality control is so terrible.

    2. Re:why do they have problems? by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      I underatand why Microsoft's operating systems and word processors and stuff might be buggy: they have to provide legacy support and the hardware configurations can be complex.

      I think that's the problem. They're trying to create the illusion that WinCE shares a legacy with Win* to attract developers, thus introducing the problems of legacy support as well.

      Best,
      -jimbo

    3. Re:why do they have problems? by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 2, Informative
      like security, quality is a process. "quality control" is basically checking for manufacturing defects in physical (tangible) products. quality control in the software arena (beta testing, i.e., customers) is not really enough. the loop has to be tighter. enter "quality assurance" which is in its ideal form the checking of the the production process (how programmers program), not just throwing it over the wall to some hapless tester who has very little insight into not only the cause of any perceived software misbehaviors, but the cause of the mindset that went into the programming of those misbehaviors.

      this is nothing new, just listen to any extreme programming advocate 'splain it to ya.

      in any case, usloth knows all this but can't be bothered because they are, as many people now understand, simply a marketing shell around a captive (in the sense of bound and gagged) research and development core. but unlike the makeup of the earth, where the crust is relatively thin, and the mantle (and core) are relatively thick, usloth marketing is like the gases of jupiter; who knows what enormous pressures must be exerted on the miniscule core trapped inside.

      if someone were to send a monolith and ignite usloth, perhaps all those nice minds bribed to remain silent could spark another star, to complement that which is already burning, i.e., free software.

    4. Re:why do they have problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "However, considering their resources and (I'm assuming) talent... shouldn't they be able to do something like this and have it be pretty sound technology? "

      1) Experience.
      2) Experience.

      They have neither in the field of making a cell phone work.

      No it's not a typo.

  28. ME == A Disease by grolschie · · Score: 1

    ME is a name of a disease: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. It figures.

  29. Thank you for purchasing MS Smartphone.... by grolschie · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank you for purchasing the Microsoft Smartphone. Be sure to activate your phone online within 60 days else your phone will be permanently disabled. Also please sign up for our .NET Passport SmartPhone service*

    *Disclaimer:
    Although we use the terms "security" and "privacy" in much of our press releases, we can guarantee neither. Your personal details and credit card numbers will be safely stored on our secure system which is roughly equivalent to leaving your keys in your car's ignition.

  30. An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [Clipped from MacInTouch 5/15/03]

    Jimmy Grewal followed up on recent notes about a BMW computer bug that trapped the occupant inside his car:

    I work for Microsoft (program manager for Mac Internet Explorer), and I own a 2002 BMW 745i. Though the underlying OS the vehicle is running is Windows CE for Automotive, BMW and Siemens VDO wrote all of the software that the car is running: [BMW iDrive press release]

    I don't think Microsoft should be blamed for problems with the applications written by others on top of their OS, just as no one blames Apple for the problems users have with third party software on their Macs. Furthermore, the on board computer that is running WinCEfA is used to control the radio, tv, navigation system, telephone, etc (commonly referred to a telematics features). The engine management system, electrical, etc. are controlled by another set of computers that also manage emissions, diagnostics, etc.

    The 7-Series does have a lot of issues that BMW needs to address, including major failures like this, but most of those are related to the drive-by-wire systems rather than the navigation/entertainment system that's running WinCEfA. It has its own problems, but those are related to confusing controls and an unintuitive interface

    1. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by g4dget · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Ease of development, ease of testing, ease of debugging, and familiarity to developers are Microsoft's biggest selling points for Windows CE (otherwise, it's just a run-of-the-mill embedded kernel). But apparently, even with all those wonderful features, even companies like BMW, usually known for a commitment to quality, have a hard time developing good software. So, we have to conclude that Microsoft's main selling point for Windows CE probably doesn't make a difference.

      Of course, people develop bad software with Linux as well. The difference is that Linux has no pretenses about it: software development is hard, GUI development is hard, and VisualFoobar doesn't make it much easier. If anything, VisualFoobar lets people who aren't sufficiently skilled do things they shouldn't be doing in the first place.

    2. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a CE developer, I totally concur. It's getting worse not better...

    3. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you do not have the IQ or the physical strength to overcome a small locking solenoid on a door handle you need to be publically tar'ed feathered and paraded on a wagon through thestreets as a complete and utter idiot.

      The 7 series BMW HAS traditional door designs where you see the lock/unlock tab. It's there in case of an accident and all power is lost in the vehicle..

      Yet more proof that the Rich are some of the most stupid people on this planet... I wish I had the lack of scruples they do so I can feel good about screwing people to gain my riches...

    4. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by geschild · · Score: 1

      *tongue in cheek*

      I'm impressed. Not necesarrily by your job-description, I have no way of telling that it is true.

      No, I'm impressed because you come onto /., 'confess' that you are a Microsoft manager, for Mac IE no less and still you get modded up to +5!

      In the light of average rabiatness of the average /.er and that of the anti-MS and Mac community in particular that is an achievement...

      */tongue in cheek*

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
    5. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      But apparently, even with all those wonderful features, even companies like BMW, usually known for a commitment to quality, have a hard time developing good software.
      BMW is not a software shop. I don't know if they hired in programmers for the apps their cars use, but I wouldn't take their difficulty writing software for platform X as an indication of how crappy platform X is.

      In light of this discussion, I think I would have to blame BMW for this, and not Microsoft. Even if MS designed a flawed OS for the car, BMW let it slip past their QA people and is selling it to consumers now, even though it occasionally traps government officials inside. This sounds like the sort of "In the Future There Will Be Robots" sci-fi horror stories from not too long ago - in the future, our cars will be able to drive themselves, yadda yadda yadda, until one day a car turns on its owner!

      BMW sold a product made up of inferior stuff. MS may have created some of the inferior stuff (and maybe not, it's irrelevant) but I blame BMW for telling consumers that everything works as it should.
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    6. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Most companies worry about their image when releasing a new product and do everything they can to have a successful launch of the product... MS has allways fallen short on this... This is the general public opinion of MS.. what is MS doing to change this view? I don't see alot... You'd think if the OS was as stable as MS claims they would have a Software engineering team helping BMW write thier software so MS will gain credibility.. But instead Typical MS mentality about the problems... MS is just a Marketing company.. not much else... They don't need to do much to maintain a monopoly.. They shift as much as they can onto the marketing depeartment to keep themselves afloat.

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    7. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by g4dget · · Score: 1
      BMW is not a software shop. I don't know if they hired in programmers for the apps their cars use, but I wouldn't take their difficulty writing software for platform X as an indication of how crappy platform X is.

      And I didn't, if you actually bothered to read what I wrote.

      But Microsoft's supposedly big advantage for Windows CE over more mature, and standards-based systems like QNX is that Windows CE is familiar to Windows programmers and comes with Microsoft's really easy-to-use development environments. Supposedly, with Windows CE, regular Windows programmers can produce great embedded code because it's so easy.

      What this (and other CE problems) suggest is that regular Windows programmers writing code for CE produce regular Windows software: software that crashes far too much. Only, that in a car that matters a whole lot more than on a desktop.

    8. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I didn't, if you actually bothered to read what I wrote.
      Classic! Treat disagreement as a direct insult against your manhood! Counter a rebuttal with a RTFM-style knee-jerk response. Go back and re-read what you wrote, and then my response. It actually was directly related to what you wrote, and was devoid of any insults. Perhaps it required a little bit of abstract thought, but it was at least on-topic.


      (posting anonymously so the comment gets a 0, staying under the radar from most people. And also so I don't get an e-mail message with your next inane response. I no longer care to hear what you have to say.)
    9. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by pmz · · Score: 1

      ...VisualFoobar doesn't make it much easier.

      What a perfect name for the next release of the Microsoft development suite. However, I would like to suggest the proper spelling: VisualFUBAR.

      It has a nice ring to it.

    10. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, I used to think BMW was a paragon of quality, but after seeing the crap they've put out lately, that perception is forever shattered. Good job, BMW! I think I'll stick with Honda, which has been smart enough to not use WinCE in any of its cars.

      Honestly, it doesn't take a genious to avoid MS products for an application where extreme reliability is necessary, given their well-earned reputation.

    11. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Classic! Treat disagreement as a direct insult against your manhood!

      Who even said I was a man?

      In any case, you wrote:

      I wouldn't take their difficulty writing software for platform X as an indication of how crappy platform X is.
      I didn't say anything about Windows CE being "crappy", I said it was just a "run-of-the-mill embedded kernel".

      Classic! Treat disagreement as a direct insult against your manhood! Counter a rebuttal with a RTFM-style knee-jerk response. [...] (posting anonymously so the comment gets a 0, staying under the radar from most people. And also so I don't get an e-mail message with your next inane response. I no longer care to hear what you have to say.)

      So, you are telling us that you are just a flaming jerk who can't read and who apparently also can't figure out that if I cared to send E-mail (whatever for?), I could just hit the "Parent" link twice?

    12. Re:An attempt to defend...(I'm not impressed) by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      I work for Microsoft (program manager for Mac Internet Explorer), and I own a 2002 BMW 745i. Though the underlying OS the vehicle is running is Windows CE for Automotive...

      Thanks. I've been thinking about upgrading my BMW, and now I know which model to avoid.

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  31. Trolling is a difficult art. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    As he said, he intended to troll. But an accident of wording made his comment funny instead.

  32. Linux the embedded OS standard??? by kinnell · · Score: 1
    In the non-graphic embedded market, Linux is already the standard

    Why does everyone insist on claiming that linux has taken over the embedded market? What about VXworks? PalmOS? QNX? Are these people quaking in their boots? I don't think so. What about all the special purpose real time OSes that many companies use. Linux isn't the standard in the embedded market any more than it is the standard on the desktop. Yes, it's more popular than it was a couple of years ago, and will probably get more popular with the increase in embedded products which are special purpose PCs like PVRs etc, but this doesn't make it a standard. If you have any figures to even suggest the opposite, I would love to see them.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    1. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by RoLi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why does everyone insist on claiming that linux has taken over the embedded market?

      I work in the embedded market and it is the standard.

      Our partner-company was a 100% Microsoft-shop and Linux is forbidden in the corporate LAN - yet they still chose Linux as their platform for *ALL* their new devices.

      What about VXworks? PalmOS? QNX? Are these people quaking in their boots?

      Yes they are. You can get big discounts from everybody.

      What about all the special purpose real time OSes that many companies use.

      Used in many existing devices, but for most new developments, a real OS is chosen for shorter development time. (the hardware is fast enough already)

      Linux isn't the standard in the embedded market any more than it is the standard on the desktop.

      Laughable. According to this study: here Linux (+ BSD) was running on 11% of existing systems in 2001, but was used for 50% of new projects.

      I can only confirm these developments, Linux is already the de-facto standard on embedded systems.

    2. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by kinnell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stattdessen soll Embedded Linux mit 27 Prozent zur bei weitem am häufigsten eingesetzten Plattform werden

      27% is not 50%. But even so, 50% does not imply a standard, it just means it's the most popular. When 90% of embedded projects use linux, you'll have a case to make.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    3. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why does everyone insist on claiming that linux has taken over the embedded market?
      I work in the embedded market and it is the standard.

      I work in the embedded market, too, and me thinks you don't even realize just how big the "embedded" market is.

      For your information, *most* embedded systems don't even use an operating system. They are developed based on microcontrollers and the software is designed to solve a specific functional problem, unit cost must be minimized, and operating systems such as Linux, PalmOS, or Windows are definitely not used--the cost of the hardware necessary to run them are too high for mass production where the difference between a 25 cent part and a 50 cent part can mean hundreds of thousands of dollars in profit. Yes, I'm sure there are many "embedded" systems that use these operating systems, but to say ANY of them are the "majority" of embedded systems is far from the truth.

      The majority of embedded systems run on OS-less microcontrollers.

      To tell you the truth, I think calling Windows, Linux, or PalmOS-based systems "embedded" is to use the term liberally. I know that term is used, but embedded used to be low-level microcontroller stuff. Now "embedded" seems to mean anything that doesn't look like a computer but which has a computer inside. To me, if you're developing for Windows, Linux, or PalmOS you aren't really doing embedded development--your target system just happens to be small and/or appears to be something other than a computer.

    4. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the feeling I just read that "BSD is dying" post in reverse?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    5. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Well I was of course talking only of embedded devices using a CPU.

      However, a larger and larger share of embedded devices use a CPU and a larger and larger share of those use an OS.

    6. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too work in the embedded market and me thinks you have no idea what you're talking about. It is defintly NOT da-facto standard. Heck, when i look around there are more projects on WinCE than on Linux offered. Ok, that might change a lot in the years, but at present linux is no more a standard in embedded than it is on the desktop.

    7. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I don't doubt that a "larger and larger" share of embedded devices use full-blown CPUs that run an operating system. But if you consider the entire universe of "embedded devices"--which includes things as simple as washing machines, remote controls, telephones, CD players, microwave ovens, caller ID devices, most home security systems, the ECMs in most cars, many time & attendance units, bike speedometer/odometer, even many MP3 players (!), etc.--I think you will find that "embedded systems" which have a full-blown CPU and OS such as the ones we are discussing are still in the vast minority measured by units produced or by value of the units sold.

      I put "embedded" in quotes because I think the term "embedded" is used loosely when applied to what amount to full-blown computer systems packaged in something that doesn't look like a computer.

      It seems that "embedded" originally meant that some device with computational ability (normally a microcontroller) was *embedded* into the design of the rest of the electronics. It formed an integral part of the design and made the device more intelligent. Now, an "embedded" system running Windows or Linux is no longer *embedded*--it's really more accurate to say that it's a computer that has been packaged in a certain way and is running certain software to perform a specific task.

      To me, if a device could essentially be plugged into a monitor and keyboard and operate as a computer or if the software being run on an "embedded" system could pretty much just be dropped onto a PC and run, that isn't embedded to me. That's developing specialized PC applications that use alternative I/O. Big deal.

      Just because a computer is small and looks like a phone doesn't make it "embedded." It's just a small computer that looks like a phone. :)

    8. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by jelle · · Score: 1

      Nothing to see here moderators. Move on.

      "What about all the special purpose real time OSes that many companies use"

      Old news: The ELC, which includes such corporate heavyweights as IBM, Intel, Motorola, Panasonic, Samsung, Sharp, Siemens and Sony, is clearly gaining momentum in its effort to bring Linux to the forefront of the embedded market. .

      "f you have any figures to even suggest the opposite, I would love to see them."

      If the list of companies in the Embedded Linux Consortium does not impress you, then who do _you_ think are actually the implementers of most of the volume shipments of embedded systems?

      Smell Coffee. Read more, be informed.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    9. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by jelle · · Score: 1

      "and Linux is forbidden in the corporate LAN" ...

      I bet the engineers have a 'shadow LAN' in parallel with that nonsense 'no Linux corporate LAN'. This mostly Linux shadow LAN is probably the one on which the actual work gets done, and two years from now the managers will claim that that one was the official one to begin with.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    10. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 1

      "Stattdessen soll Embedded Linux mit 27 Prozent zur bei weitem am häufigsten eingesetzten Plattform werden"

      27% is not 50%. But even so, 50% does not imply a standard, it just means it's the most popular.

      Allow me to help you a little with the language. It says: "[in future projects] Embedded Linux should become by far the most widely deployed platform, with 27 percent" and goes on to say:

      "Fast die Hälfte der Embedded-Entwickler will innerhalb der nächsten zwölf Monate eine Anwendung für Linux oder ein anderes Open-Source-System fertigstellen", that is, "Almost half of Embedded developers want to do a project with Linux or another Open Source system within the next 12 months."

      So half of embedded developers plan to use Linux (or BSD as most likely second choice) for a project this year, Linux will have 27% of all projects, more than twice the second place platform, CE. While I would not describe this as a "takeover" in so many words, it is certainly a "dominant" position, apparently well on its way to "takeover".

      --
      Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
    11. Re:Linux the embedded OS standard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, except for Winblows all OS'es are more or less posix compliant, aren't they?

  33. This all may be true but by dsb · · Score: 1

    does Billy really care?

    What state or combo state lottery ticket do you want to win? Even if you win that lottery ticket, you don't even come close to Billy's wealth.

    To the previous poster, you forgot about the consumer. The consumer now knows who and what Microsoft is about, especially big business. Businesses are trying to find all kinds of ways to rid them selves of them licencing fees. To us basement geeks thats easy; open source. The home market has shifted away from pc's and into the 'all encompasing entertainment console' which it seems Sony is the most active in that pursuit.

    But jeez, Billy's got so much money, he can't even keep up with giving it away.

    1. Re:This all may be true but by ckaminski · · Score: 1
      Even if you win that lottery ticket, you don't even come close to Billy's wealth.

      And since Billy's wealth is intrinsicly tied to the price of Microsoft stock, that's all that Billy effectively has. A lot of lottery tickets that could be worth billions, or not.

      But jeez, Billy's got so muhcm oney, he can't even keep up with giving it away.

      Because of federal insider trading rules, Billy can't do his profit taking in a timely enough fashion to actually allow him to claim 30billion dollars. Such a move would cause an instant panic in the MSFT stock, and reduce his price to pennies per share.

  34. From an SPV Owner... by ZaPhOd42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I hate to go against he usual Slashdot Anti-Microsoft grain, but I've owned an SPV for a couple of months and haven't really encountered any significant problems.

    Or rather, I've experienced no more bugs than I've had with various Nokia phones I've used in the past.

    My only real issues have been:

    1. Crap battery life. Just over 3 days standby if you're lucky. (But that said, it's got a backlit screen that's so bright the phone can be used as a torch!)

    2. Adding a contact makes a noise when the "Silent" profile is selected.

    3. Occasional problems synchronising emails and contacts with Arselook. Easily fixed by re-syncing and not really a problem because I don't use outlook.

    4. Occasional menu lagginess

    5. Playing MP3's eats battery life. But this is to be expected.

    Of course, the bonus of having an SPV is I can play Doom on my mobile!

    That said, I'm sure it's only a matter of time before I see the good old BSOD!

    1. Re:From an SPV Owner... by wheany · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can play Doom on Nokia 7650 and 3650...

  35. time out by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Read it again...I posted a MS defense blurb from the MS PM, that was from another site...he didn't 'come onto /.'...

    I took the liberty of posting his comment in relation to the BMW story above. And as I said in the title, I'm not impressed by what the MS PM said. Blaming the house fire on the painters may fly in court, but the fact that the foundation cracked, and the breaker box fell off the wall and onto a bucket of open paint, and the paint fire took the house down, is a bit weak, I think.

    1. Re:time out by geschild · · Score: 0

      MY EYES! MY EYES! I've gone blind to italics!

      Seriously though, I would love to remove my foot from my mouth, but it's wedged tight by my other foot that was still in there. This is the second stupid reading mistake I make in a week, guess it's time for a time-out.

      In the mean time: my appologies for my bad 'joke(s)'.

      --
      Karma? What's that again?
  36. Doom on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought an Orange SPV - I was annoyed to hell that they locked it from apps developers, but now all thats sorted. I'm very happy with it - does just what I need.

    And it plays Doom too.

    Just cos it's 'microsoft' everyone rants.

  37. msmobiles.com credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just a sidenote about msmobiles.com site and their attitude towards different wireless players.
    Msmobiles.com is authored by Mr Jacek Rutkowski (jpzr), who got kicked out of Nokia because of industrial espionage and disloyalty. He was in close contact with Microsoft and popular opinion is that he used his position to deliver confidential information to Redmond.
    You can notice that he is using the site to vent his anger towards Nokia and to promote his one-sided pro-MS views.
    I do not know all the details behind his firing, but I used to work with him so the information is correct.

  38. I got my Smartphone yesterday by joeykiller · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here where I live the Smartphone was officially introduced yesterday, and I've been using one for 24 hours now.

    Say what you want about Microsoft, but this time I feel that their 1.0 product is very polished. I've not expirienced any instability, but perhaps I haven't used it enough yet.

    Anyway, the user interface is much simpler, more to the point and more usable than competing Smartphone-ish operating systems, as the ones found on Ericsson P800 and Nokia 7650.

    It's difficult to describe, really, but it's simpleness - with natural but (in this context) innovative functions as a home button and a back button on the keyboard - really makes it stand out. The browser "home" and "back" metaphor is uses throughout the OS.

    I can't say I've often had this experience with a mobile phone (and I'm not sure that it's a good thing, money wise), but this made me _want_ to use it! *Much*. For mail (the Inbox is surprisingly good), for messaging (it has both SMS and MSN Messenger, as well as MMS), for contacts, for appointments, etc.

    For years I've carried around both a Palm and a Nokia cell phone, but this is the first hybrid product that's a serious contender to the Palm.

    The major gripe is Microsoft's ActiveSync software. I've never been able to make ActiveSync sync successfully with anything. It works the first few times, then it stops wanting to sync altogether. This happened with my HP Jornada 720, later happened with the original Compaq IPaq and now it happens with this phone.

    It's a major let down. But the phone in itself is a joy to use.

    1. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by haggar · · Score: 1

      24 hours of usage? Even if you wouldn't have been sleeping or doing anything else but using the phone, you still would not have been able to assess the quality of such a complex and multifunctional product.

      My impression of the MS smartphone products has been very bad, because I have used competing platforms. And btw, mobile phones are my job actually, so I have the opportunity to use many different models. See, MS will not be accepted by those customers who have been using other mobile phones before and have higher expectations and needs - mobile phones nowadays (at least here in Europe) must o a variety of tasks, voice and SMS are not enough.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by m0nkyman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The saddest thing happened when I read this. I realized that I was assuming this was astro turfing. It didn't even occur to me that it could be a real account of somebody enjoying using something. My trust in people has dropped yet another notch. Marketing wins yet another round.

      Pooey.

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    3. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by joeykiller · · Score: 1
      mobile phones nowadays (at least here in Europe) must o a variety of tasks, voice and SMS are not enough.


      That comment alone gives me the feeling that you don't know much about what kind of product the Smartphone is. It's not only about SMS and voice, but rather it's about your "variety of tasks".

      I never tried to give the impression that I wrote a thorough review. I was just giving my impression based on my first 24 hours with the telephone. But I did sleep, and were still able to understand, use _and_ enjoy using the phone as a phone, using the phone for SMS, using the phone for taking pictures, reading and sending email, add and remove contacts and set up my meeting schedule. For me that says a lot about how intuitive the Smartphone OS really is.

      As you, my job _is_ mobile phones. As you, I live in Europe. Maybe I'm an idiot but I never became that productive (i.e. unproductive) so fast with the competing PDA/cell phone hybrids on the European market today. I know I go out on a limb here, but that's my experience - and I like to call myself a professional.

      As for the quality and stability I know little, just as I said in my original comment. After all, I've only been using it for 24 hours.
    4. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by haggar · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what a smartphone should do, I didn't imply it doesn't do them (you might have missunderstood that way), but I am saying that the MS smartphones don'do them correctly all of the time. In functional testing, stability, reliability is the most important. Featureset is implied.

      --
      Sigged!
    5. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by pmz · · Score: 1

      I realized that I was assuming this was astro turfing. It didn't even occur to me that it could be a real account of somebody enjoying using something.

      Well, even if it isn't astroturfing, realize that he/she had the phone only 24 hours. It often takes a few days or even a few weeks before the novelty-aspect of a new toy wears off and reality, good or bad, sets in.

      For example, for me, the novelty of Windows XP wore off in a matter of minutes. Red Hat 7.X with GNOME took about me a few hours. For some reason I have yet to tire of OpenBSD and Solaris--but, that is just how I am. For the SmartPhone customer above, we should ask him/her/it/they again in two weeks and, then, two months and see if the enthusiasm stands. That'll be a much better measure of the quality of the phone and its software.

      My trust in people has dropped yet another notch.

      When it comes to salespeople and marketing people, my trust has bottomed out at a big fat zero. As a consumer, I have just had to accept the fact that there are more lies than truths out there, and each large purchase takes hours or, sometimes, days to sort it all out.

      I estimate that the public's general ability to make informed decisions is dropping, however. The surging number of credit cards, extended warranty scams, and instant loan scams out there mean that more and more people are strapped for money and are looking for ways to sustain a fantasy lifestyle. There is a culture forming in the U.S. where it is perfectly okay to spend other people's money on luxury items (cell phones, junk cars with nice shiny wheels, jewelry, expensive stereo equipment, video games, computers, etc. etc.). I wouldn't be suprised if, one day, the population falls into a slave state, where the creditors are the elite class providing for the commoner's additiction to superfluous toys.

    6. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by korielgraculus · · Score: 1

      Well I have had one for 3 months now and am very happy with it. Admittedly the battery life was pathetic until I updated the phone (which contrary to a previous post you DONT have to download over GPRS, in fact it requires a PC with an Internet connection) , but now that seems to have been solved I am more than satisfied with the system.

    7. Re:I got my Smartphone yesterday by joeykiller · · Score: 1

      Well, even if it isn't astroturfing, realize that he/she had the phone only 24 hours. It often takes a few days or even a few weeks before the novelty-aspect of a new toy wears off and reality, good or bad, sets in.


      Even though I don't know what astro turfing is (English is a second language for me), I agree with you that it takes longer time than 24 hours to give an honest review.

      But I never intented my original post to be conceived as a review; it was only meant to be a report of my first impression, and that first impression was entirely positive except for the ActiveSync problems.

      What amazes me though, is that my positive attitude seems to have annoyed some people here. If the annoyance comes from the fact that the OS is delivered by Microsoft, I'm astonished. Shouldn't quality, innovation and plain old ease of use be hailed no matter who delivers it?

      Even on Slashdot?
  39. Or you could try reading the article... by Burb · · Score: 1

    Quote:But Hack explained that the two methods of avoiding the phone's security will not turn the world's 1.2 billion cell phones into a breeding ground for crippling viruses. The gaps developers discovered still do not let them commandeer the phone's radio, the only way to dispatch a virus to other phones, Hack said.

    --

  40. Re:... But they don't need a carrier to approve th by ecki · · Score: 2, Informative

    They need a carrier to subsidize it so the price comes down.

  41. From the post-anal-extracted-statistics department by orcrist · · Score: 2, Informative

    The palm folks laughed but look at palms stock price now? It was $.80 a share the last time I looked! MS took over 75% of the market in less then 2 years!

    According to this article from Gartner it's more like:
    PalmOs: 55.2%
    Windows CE (sic): 25.7%
    That's as of January.

    PC World has similar numbers:
    PalmOS: 48.6%
    Pocket PC: 30%
    That's as of October.

    What was your source of info again? And did you wash afterwards? ;-)

    -chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  42. Hidden Simpson's reference? by EggMan2000 · · Score: 1

    "HomeR" Project
    - Modular Windows
    - "Otto" Project (SW for cars; 1992)


    I wonder if the "Otto" project was an attept to drive away the Apple Lisa.

    --
    what? what I thought we were in the trust tree in the nest, were we not?
  43. How many versions ? by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2, Insightful


    It took them at least 5 major release to get DOS right finally with v5.5.

    It took them at least 6/7 major versions to get C(C++) right.

    Its taken then 9 or 10 versions to get windows right with XP (v1,v2,v2.2,v3,v3.11,NT,95,NT3.5,98,NT3.5,ME) and finally XP.

    It took them 5 major versions to get IE right and they throw it away with version 6.

    And these where their core products.

    Something they've never got *right*, Office (Outlook,Word,Access), IIS, Frontpage Outlook/Exchange, J++.

    In some cases they took-over a right product and still got it wrong, i.e. FoxPro.

    1. Re:How many versions ? by 1010011010 · · Score: 1

      XP isn't "right." Windows 2000 is the best version so far. Windows XP is Windows 2000 plus a kids' play area, romper room colors, and crappy, under-performing memory management.

      Word 5.1 for the Macintosh was a suitable word processor.

      Visual C++ is "The Microsoft Lanaguage" (TML) that happens to share a good bit of syntax with C++.

      Access, IIS, Frontpage and Outlook all stink.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
  44. They flushed it down the iLoo, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Where did it go today?

  45. your argument is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Bush administration's motives for conducting the war are becoming increasingly suspect; apart from the real lack of any concrete evidence of a massive chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons programs in Iraq, senior members of the administration are begining to say that it's not important to find weapons.

    Indeed, at least one piece of evidence presented by secretary Powell to the UN, indicating Iraqi attempts to purchase nuclear material from Nigeria was, upon inspection by those not in the US government, discovered to be a very bad fake. Not to say that the actual forgery was performed by the US, but the quality of the forgery was such that it is reasonable to conclude that the mistake was intentional.

    You see, this was was not about WMDs. It was the implementation of an idea that has been percolating in the minds of neoconservatives for years now, to reorient US foriegn policy towards a militarily dominant position and up defense spending. It was a grab oil in the region; it's telling that the oil fields started working again long before the water came back in most cities.

    It was also an attempt to distract and decieve. Distract people from the shitty state of the economy, and decieve people into thinking that concrete action was being taken to ensure the security of the US. The speed at which Saddam Hussein's government crumbled, and the fact that they didn't use chemical or biological weapons to fend off an attack that was sure to topple the government, and the total absense of weapons after the war is over - these three facts make it clear that the Bush administration vastly overstated the case.

    The country was not directly threatened by Hussein. Hell, his immediate neighbors were probably safe from him. I was suprised that there were no weapons. But the Bush administration should not have been. Either the intelligence really sucked, or the administration was so hot to go to war that weaknesses in the argument were knowingly glossed over to suit the argument. Either case is disturbing; the second one is criminal.

    Finally, this whole adventure really served one main purpose: the unnecessary carrier landing. That will appear again in the elections. This whole thing was a photo op, was a political tool. We're no safer. And the Bush administration will lie and overstate things to obfuscate that fact. But it remains none the less true.

    So no, France would not have shown balls by joining us. Yeah, they had commerical interests. The Bush administration, however, had them too, along with numerous other ones. And they've showed an incredible willingness to warp the truth to suit them.

    1. Re:your argument is flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      senior members of the administration are begining to say that it's not important to find weapons.

      They're saying this because they know the public will catch on..

      To quote Bill Maher - "We believe Saddam has weapons of mass destruction. He didn't use them when he invaded Kuwait, and he hasn't used them in the 10 years since. So logically, we must invade Iraq so that we can stop him from not using them again."

      If he actually did have weapons of mass destruction, he would have used them when the US invaded. Nobody can find them because they don't exist.

  46. SmartPhones suck by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

    I have a Samsung i330, it was the only PDA phone that I could find that would work with my Powerbook and my existing Sprint number (only number that I gave out for about 3 or 4 years).

    It absolutely SUCKS! Now, as someone that fails to carry much around, it's useful... now I have a PDA the 85% of the time I remember my cel phone. However, as a phone it blows. Everytime the software crashes, I lose my voice dialing settings. Without voice dialing, the lack of a real keypad is a killer.

    I'll admit, actually carrying around a PDA is really useful, but the smart devices all suck.

    A blackberry addict at another company that we work closely with LOVES his Blackberry phone. However, the thing is awful.

    Yeah, we all are willing to suffer because we need more communications, but don't doubt for a moment that these devices REALLY, REALLY, REALLY suck.

    The problem is that everyone throws tech at the problem, and the UI suffers. My phone is a PDA first and a phone second, that's REALLY, REALLY, REALLY annoying.

    MS will not likely "win" in the cel market, it's not their bread and butter. The MS strategy is "cheap" and "good enough." PocketPC hasn't deplaced Palm DESPITE Palm's idiotic moves because they haven't been cheap. They are, however, "good enough," and many people buy the more "full-featured" device, whether they need/want it or not.

    Extra features on phones need to be well integrated... they aren't...

    Alex

    1. Re:SmartPhones suck by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 1

      Well, the Blackberry isn't supposed to be a phone. It's a glorified pager with an alphanumeric keyboard. Pagers were designed for non-vocal communication, so adding a keyboard, E-mail, and some other stuff makes much more sense than adding those to a phone. The Blackberry is actually much more capable and easy to use that at first it would seem.

      As for "Smart Phones", you're right, if they are advertised as phones, they should be phones first and PDAs second.

    2. Re:SmartPhones suck by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      I had a Blackberry... hated it... drove me nuts after a few weeks....

      Although the first few weeks when I felt all important were pretty cool.

      The Blackberry phone is HUGE...

      Alex

  47. I'll tell you how they can win. by Magnus+Pym · · Score: 1

    `Persuade' service providers to offer their phones, by dangling money in front of their noses. The cellular providers like Sprint and Verizon are in a brutally competitive market, and every little helps. If MS offers them a hundred million dollars to feature MS phones, you can bet your ass that they will do it. In fact, they have used exactly this tactic to get Sprint to supply MS phones. MS can do this because of their desktop monopoly, and 60% margins. The profit margin of a cell-phone manufacturer is under 5%, and they cannot afford to throw money away like this.

    Magnus.

  48. T-Mobile dumps MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PWNED!!!

  49. Easy fix for that... by Infernon · · Score: 1

    Industry insiders say that the software for the phone continued to have 'fundamental problems,' leading to a high failure rate.

    High failure rate? Bah! It isn't anything that wasn't cleared up with a simple reboot!!!

  50. Windows Media Player goals by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As for Windows Media Player -- I'm not even sure what Microsoft's goals were for that. ;)

    WMP is a multi-pronged strategy. First, it helps cut off the Apple publishing/video editing platform leakage. Secondly it cuts off the air supply to other video format vendors/producers (such as Real Networks) by making those external products surplus to requirements for the average user. The Window Media formats hold the potential to control the encodings and base formats of a large amount of digital video in the future and thereby increase vendor lockin.

    Funnily enough, this is a very similar strategy to the IE vs Netscape strategy. Establish a base in the core product that displaces external vendors and acheive market share as a result. Expect the same sort of maneouvre with SQL Server 2000 (or at least parts of the core engine) - it's already been seen in several places (MS VS.Net, MS Visio).

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    1. Re:Windows Media Player goals by Surak · · Score: 1
      Or, from the DOS days:
      • DOS 5/6 GUI Shell+ScanDisk+Defrag (DOSSHELL.EXE/defrag.exe/scandisk.exe) =< PCTools/Norton Utilities/et al
      • SmartDrive SMARTDRV.EXE =< QwikCache
      • EMM386.SYS/EMM386.EXE =< QEMM,386MAX
      • DoubleSpace/DriveSpace =< Stacker
  51. Fundamental Problem with WinCE by kevlar · · Score: 4, Informative

    There is a fundamental problem in WinCE which causes 90% of all the issues people see with these devices. The problem is that WinCE has poor memory management. Theoretically the OS is supposed to manage all memory aspects from stopping running apps to free memory to dynamically loading and unloading DLL's. The most serious problem however is that it restricts the amount of memory available to a DLL to 16 MB. On devices like the HP 5450 and these T-Mobile Smart Phones, this becomes a problem because of the numerous integrated devices the OS has to support. The 5450 has WiFi, Bluetooth and Biometrics which fill up 12 of the 16MB of available memory. As a result, user applications like Adobe Acrobat do not have enough memory to load their linked libraries. The only solution is to jump through hoops managing the memory manually and to disable unused devices like Bluetooth or the Biometrics (which negates getting to the device to begin with!).

    A solution to this problem is not due until WinCE .NET comes out which is due sometime this summer.

    Its unfortunate that this problem exists. It has apparently been caused by these PocketPC devices growing in size too quickly for the OS. Talk about growing pains...

    1. Re:Fundamental Problem with WinCE by rkit · · Score: 1

      Why, 640 KB should be enough for everybody!

      --
      sig intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Fundamental Problem with WinCE by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      The most serious problem however is that it restricts the amount of memory available to a DLL to 16 MB.

      "No one will ever need more than 16MB for DLL's in a cell phone." - Bill Gates, 2003

      Best,
      -jimbo

  52. Hmm (posting this over my Treo) by conan_albrecht · · Score: 1

    Since I'm sitting in my hotel room with my Powerbook connected to my Treo for internet access (about 2x modem speeds), I'd have to disagree.

    By far the greatest thing about my treo is the ability for me to use *real* internet (not dumbed down, behind the firewall stuff) directly over it's internet connection. And since Sprint's internet access is a flat rate each month, I get unlimited internet over the thing.

    Sure, browsing the web directly on the treo isn't quite the greatest, but doing SSH, email, and Mozilla on my laptop through it is really something.

  53. MS == Also A Disease by krysith · · Score: 1

    MS is also the name of a disease: Microsof...er, Multiple Sclerosis.
    Some great quotes from the Multiple Sclerosis Foundation website: "Common symptoms of MS include fatigue, weakness, spasticity, balance problems, bladder and bowel problems, numbness, vision loss, tremors and depression...More than 90% of men and 70% of women with MS report some change in their sexual life after the onset of the disease. Some problems include decreased sexual drive, impaired sensation, diminished orgasmic response, and loss of sexual interest."

    And I thought having to reboot three times a day was bad! (My sympathies go out to those with the non-computerized form of MS, esp. Dean K.).

  54. If you don't have a lot of time to read reviews by daviddennis · · Score: 1
    This is probably the best one, and squares with my experience with PocketPC phones.

    If it's anything like the PocketPC phone I tried, it's horribly clunky and overtly complex. It's like a tiny Windows XP box, which can look cute at first, but it falls down flat for a small device.

    D

  55. When will the industry learn? by MrTangent · · Score: 2, Funny
    Industry insiders say that the software for the phone continued to have 'fundamental problems,' leading to a high failure rate. French mobile carrier Orange introduced a MS SmartPhone, SPV, late last year. It initially had software security problems...
    Well, duh, people... ALL Microsoft software has security problems and is buggy, crash-prone (okay, NT/Win2k ain't half bad...). I salute those in the industry that are actively taking steps to remove cruddy Microsoft code from their servers/computers and in this case future cell phones.

    Remember, friends don't let friends use Microsoft products.
  56. Late, but why not by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    [Nelson voice]
    Ha Haa!
    [/Nelson voice]

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  57. Re:it figures...... (off topic) by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    HEY!!!

    You must not be patriotic if you're talking like that! And if you're not with us, you're against us(resident idiot George W. Bush told us so!), so if you think that the facts are nessessary....you are supporting and comforting Saddam in Iraq!!!!!!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  58. That was a good decision. by Mr_Bethesda · · Score: 1

    Using MS on a phone might turn the infamous Blue Screen of Death into a literal Scream of Death if you had to call 911.....not a fun thought.

    Which would make an effective commercial for a company whose competitors use MS stuff.

  59. It wasn't dumped, it was delayed! by nvrrobx · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this article the phone was delayed, not dumped... There is a difference.

  60. Re:it figures...... (off topic) by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    While we're being off topic: The US is the major muscle behing the UN. In a very real way, we are the UN. We take the majority of responsibility (though we appear to be abusing it right now - I'm no dubya lover) and so we take the majority of the rights as well.

    The UN is dumb anyway. Having a world government only works if it has some level of authority.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. LOL more evidense LUNIX ROOLS M$ SUX !!!1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    omg smartpfone canceled torlf

  62. Re:it figures...... (off topic) by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

    yeah... so being $bns in defecit and aborting UN decisions is being the muscle huh?

    I am ashamed of the US attitude to the UN... how can a global order succeed if at the behest of one powerful natons?

    > The US is dumb anyway.
    ??? In what way sir, or are you appealing to the trailer trash? The UN is very canny, just its opinions do not always align with the US's own interests

    > ...world government...
    The UN is not a world government. Perhaps you want the US to be a world government? Is authority anologious to military power... if so you are a sad sad simple simple person

  63. Ha by Juln · · Score: 1

    The software has fundamental problems.
    They were going to pick software from Microsoft, and it took them that long to notice it had 'fundamental problems'?? Have these people used any MS OSes between 1982 and 2001??
    It isn't hard to imagine that a Microsoft-'powered' cel phone would all in all fucking suck hell on a stick.

    --
    Juln
  64. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And she's not dumped me. She only asked for a little more time to answer about my proposal...

  65. Micro$oft problems... by musicscene · · Score: 1

    Ok... opening myself up for flames for admitting not reading all the replies... and ranting... ... but it is beyond me why anyone would use any M$ product/service with all of the bloody security holes in everything the seem to produce.

    [shrug]

    [back to your regularly scheduled post readin']

    --
    "I'm not ashamed I can't function in society like I'm supposed to." - Paul Westerberg
  66. Unmovable Object? by jelle · · Score: 1

    So Sony is an unmovable object? Obviously even?

    Do you even (ever?) read the news?

    You sound very much like an optimistic Microsoft SalesPerson(tm), or somebody who owns a little bit too much stock of it.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  67. I'm sorry but........ by whitehat · · Score: 1

    Did you say MS just bought Symbian?

  68. Pocket PC Phone Edition by daviddennis · · Score: 1

    You are correct - I was in fact referring to the Pocket PC Phone Edition. Based on my admittedly limited experience, it's a genuinely; awful product.

    I'm glad for your sake the MS Smartphone is better, but I can't say I really want the MS monopoly to take over the phone world. Fortunately, based on The Register's stories, it doesn't look like it will.

    D