Slashdot Mirror


OrbiTouch Keyless Keyboard Review

robyn217 writes "When I last looked at strange, new keyboards (here's the previous thread here on slashdot), I thought I'd seen it all... not even close! I just reviewed a new keyless keyboard, called the OrbiTouch, and gave it a run for its money. It's literally made up of two humps--it reminds me of holding onto my knees rather a keyboard. To type or mouse, you need to move the humps around in a synchronized manner. It's twisted--but it's better for you to decide for yourself--here's the article, OrbiTouch Review: A Keyless Keyboard with lots of pictures. Think you'll give it a test drive? Will it survive the year?"

347 comments

  1. Touchless by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would be great if it works as advertise. I am a Laptop user myself and it would help. I don't know if I could get use to the no feel response.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

  2. price by Wakkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to the last page of the review, it costs $695. Interesting concept but .... need I say more?

    1. Re:price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last page? It's in the SECOND PARAGRAPH!

      Freakin' "skimmer"

    2. Re:price by Fancy78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because some of us have RSI and simply can not type with out pain. It would be a bargain if it would let me continue my career.

    3. Re:price by sixdotoh · · Score: 1
      Number of people with RSI willing to pay vs. cost of keeping company alive . . .?

      i agree, for that price, cool concept or not, how long can it last . . .

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    4. Re:price by interiot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Especially because it can seemingly be replaced with two cheap 8-way joysticks. That's all it is, two joysticks with fancy boob coverings.

    5. Re:price by vmfedor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's not the point. The whole idea behind this fancy contraption is to make sure that wrist/finger movement is kept to a minimum. Joysticks require a lot of wrist movement.

      --

      I like my women how I like my sugar.. granulated.

    6. Re:price by FFON · · Score: 0

      mmm boob coverings

      --
      .cig
    7. Re:price by interiot · · Score: 4, Funny

      So glue some of these (not necessarily work safe, depending on your employer's opinion on synthetics) to two 8-way joysticks. It's still far cheaper.

    8. Re:price by hpavc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the problem i have is that this style of input is that it transfers the labour of input motion from the wrists and lower arms to the lower arms and shoulder. especially with the dual input and fast small mtions.

      if you suffer like i do, the referred pains after using this are terrible. now you feel pain arms shoulder and neck.

      in my opinion its all about this product ...

      http://www.fingerworks.com/touchstream_products. ht ml ... but its got its own price problem and it does take a while to use. but its unix friendly and the emacs movements are a real nice way of showing it off

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    9. Re:price by errxn · · Score: 5, Funny

      The article says: Just reach down with both hands and grab your knees...

      $695? I think that I'll just go ahead and grab my ankles...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    10. Re:price by shokk · · Score: 1

      Gawd what a waste. If only all the people that bought this sort of crappy gadget had something *really* serious to do on a computer. Of course that's probably what they said about the joystick when it first came out, and it can be used for serious stuff like 3D modeling in medical apps. I only see this being used in a porno parlor 10 years from now with little pink buttons right on the top as the best new enhancement. Enjoy the new Microsoft Feel-Mouse(TM)!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    11. Re:price by kwashiorkor · · Score: 1

      I can already see this "key"board's first killer app:

      Karate Champ teaches typing!

      --
      -- kwashiorkor --
      Leaps in Logic
      should not be confused with
      Jumping to Conclusions.
    12. Re:price by stand · · Score: 1

      [Jack Nicolson voice]
      I want you to take the keyboard and hold it between your knees!

      --
      Four fifths of all our troubles in this life would disappear if we would just sit down and keep still. -C. Coolidge
    13. Re:price by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 1

      Funny or no, you have a good point! I'd really love to know _why_ this thing is so expensive- 8-directional digital inputs that you can "click"- that technology is ancient and cheap. The software can't be complex enough to warrant that kind of price tag- it doesn't even have to do any real gesture recognition or anything - just change some bits to other bits... what's the deal? I'd probably try this thing out if it cost less than $100...

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    14. Re:price by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Development costs.

      They came up with it, researched and designed the handrests, and programed the software. They could probably sell it for less, but even if they could sell it for the exact same amount as a normal keyboard they wouldn't get a lot of market penetration. For the people who really need it the price is fine, and it will allow them to actualy recoup those costs.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    15. Re:price by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 1

      Seems like it's this kind of thinking that's caused the keyboard to stay virtually the same for as long as it has, though, don't you think? I mean, instead of taking on a "change the way we compute" mentality, they're trying to help out a very select group of people (people with disabilities, stress injuries, or just lots of money to piss away). This is admirable in its own way, and if that's their target audience, then, sure, they need a high price point to recoup NRE. But... when is somebody going to come along and design something like this (maybe not.. just like this), but something that really is a better way to do what a keyboard does? I'm waiting. I've seen several examples (stationary-hand chorded keyboards, this thing, zero-force keyboards, that crazy-ass cyberhand thing from Contact), but they're all prohibitively expensive. For this to work, the cost needs to not only be low enough to compete with other fancy keyboards, but low enough for people to want to try it out. Anyway, I'm waiting... I want a user input device that doesn't suck! They keyboard is most certainly _NOT_ the pinnacle of input devices, regardless of what anyone says. It's outdated, archaic, and designed for something basically different than what we're now using it for.

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    16. Re:price by vrwarp · · Score: 1

      KEYboard....

      --
      --vrwarp
    17. Re:price by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

      One of the ways to decrease the price is to integrate this device with a Real Doll (http://www.realdoll.com). You just have to put some extra logic inside. A customer provides the joystick.

    18. Re:price by Desult · · Score: 1

      Personally, I found the TouchStream ST mentioned in the article much more attractive. Essentially a big touchpad that functioned as keyboard, mouse, and gesture pad. Gestures seem fun, useful, and productive, as Minority Report confirmed for me mentally. The TouchStream seems a bit limited, and restrictive due to its small size. However, an entire section of a desk, or true keyboard size pad would be a blast to use, I think. The only major problem is sensory response (none).

      Perhaps a gelpad type material would be appropriate? It would provide interesting sensory feedback, and it would allow you to rest your hands comfortably on the surface without triggering.

      -Greg

      --
      -Greg
    19. Re:price by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I can find a Kinesis for $191, around the same price as a regular high-end keyboard. Or for that matter I can switch a standard keyboard to Dvorak layout for free. Both of those options are better than a normal qwerty board.

      Very few use either though. People don't think it is worth it: they think it is to hard to learn, or just too expensive when they get a keyboard free with the computer. ZERO would not be enough to get most of my family to try my Kinesis, and it is standard qwerty!

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    20. Re:price by CheeseMonkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah- I damn near impulse bought one those puppies! That thing looks sweet... but it suffers from the same (well 1/2 anyway) price gouge as the boobieboard. Particularly since I may shell out the $300 for the thing and then decide I hate it... shipping and restocking later, and I've just wasted enough money to have bought a brand new plain-jane keyboard. Anyway, $300 actually seems reasonable to me for the technology behind that thing, though.. I guess that's the different there... I doubt their profit margins are outrageous, and I'm guessing a lot more engineering went into the touchstream than went into the orbmotron.

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    21. Re:price by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      yes but try getting your insurance company to pay for joysticks.
      I think I probably beat the hell out of robotron with that thing.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    22. Re:price by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I could probably, with the help of some internet sites, an old keyboard, some push swtiches, and a few 7400 ICs, rig something up that was similar to the Orb thing but made mostly out of stuff around the house. There's no way I could even come close to the Touchstream; I wouldn't even be able to get the keys let alone the gestures part. Yet the Orb thing is twice the price of the Touchstream...

    23. Re:price by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Those would keep me at the JOYsticks a lot longer :-)

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  3. Mouseless Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can it be a keyboard and not have keys?

    Tubeless monitors rule!

  4. Make it a single ball for 1 hand by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and you've got it made. Sorta like what divers have to use. my biggest complaint about keyboards is their limited motion.... I can relearn to type (tho it would be rather hard, I admit)... just give me a keyboard I can use with 1 hand and rest it wherever I need to (no jokes about a keyboard in your lap, etc ;P)

    Besides, that many keystrokes combined with a good mouse might make sims such as Americas Army quite a bit more interesting ;-)

    1. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by dasuridai · · Score: 1

      I think that sounds like a great idea, but I think that the additional options of using both hands require their use. However, I would like to see something like mice/keyboards. It would be like have a mouse for both hands, with different key combo's or whatever for typing. I know it sounds complicated, but typing IS complicated, but it still becomes easy with enough practice.

    2. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by Transient0 · · Score: 1

      he's got a good point.

      I think most coders spend more time with one hand one the keyboard than they might think. Especially if they are using Windows and don't have the middle-click-as-copy thing going for them. There are a lot of cases where you want to be able to make simple command keystrokes while also using the mouse.

      If these keyboards don't make it realatively easy to press any CTRL-(letter) combination with only the left hand, I could consider that a pitfall.

    3. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by sixdotoh · · Score: 1

      along with your CTRL key thing, i'm glad that the tiny backspace key has finally seemed to go out of style. what was with that! one of the most used keys ;) and they make it this tiny little thing and end up hitting that stupid slash . . . ugh

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    4. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by Crockerboy · · Score: 1

      You got an excellent ponit there, I do spend a lot of time with one hand on the keyboard and one on the mouse..enough so that I've actually gotten rather good at being over to slide the left hand over and do some nominal typing with the left hand on the right home row.

      Even more so with the standard WASD and Mouse games.

      What I'd like to see is a keyboard where half with a mouse built into the right half where you phsically move the entire key set as if it was a mouse. Therefore I can move the mouse as much as I needed and be able still type just as fast.

      I wouldn't pay $695 for it though, maybe $150~$200 tops.

    5. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by blamanj · · Score: 1

      1 hand

      Shades of Doug Engelbart's original design of a combination of mouse and "chording" keyboard.

    6. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a half keyboard that uses chords of left-hand keys and the space bar to give you access to right-hand keys. Costs $300, but it seems like the sort of thing that could be done just as well in software if one were so inclined.
      http://www.halfkeyboard.com/halfkeyboard/index.htm l

    7. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Playing a WAR SIM one-handed? What kind of a sicko ARE you?

    8. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      just give me a keyboard I can use with 1 hand and rest it wherever I need to

      her you go

      The twiddler has been around for years, and is in use by many many people.

      Oh and it's massively cheaper than this 2 knees nightmare.

      I have used it to debug a shell script while biking before.. I dont reccomend doing that again...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now they're rotating the insert/delete/pageup/pagedown box and expanding the delete button. I dunno what they're thinking.

      Yet all keyboards I've seen still have the sysrq key. Heh. I know it has some use, but, sheesh. :)

    10. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by roothorick · · Score: 1

      You mean... you haven't heard of ratpoison yet? It's an entirely keyboard-driven (as in, literally the only thing it does with the mouse is preserving cursor positions on a per-window basis) WM based heavily on GNU screen. Combined with XMMS' zxcvb shortcuts and Mozilla's variety of keyboard shortcuts, I may never use my mouse again. (It's still on my desk, though: The red light on the back helps the mood, and you just can't play a FPS without a mouse, it simply can't be done effectively)

      IMO, the world shouldn't have mice at all. With TODAY'S TECHNOLOGY and a little ingenuity, we could have fairly inexpensive (albeit somewhat insecure) "gloves" that allow us to use our hands to control our computers.

    11. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      The Twiddler was pretty good. I have a former boss who built an ultra-low-cost wearable by modifying a VR helmet and a subnotebook, using a twiddler. He had no problem learning to key on it. I've considered something like this for my (music) keyboards, but I prefer midi control surfaces over (qwerty) keyboards and mice.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    12. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by gavbaa · · Score: 1

      People have done it with software. It's just patented, so everyone who's done it has been forced to remove it from their product. For an example, see uControl, a Mac keyboard control panel app, which did just that. "Did" is the operative word here.

    13. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by EddWo · · Score: 1

      Like this one?
      http://members.optusnet.com.au/~azagnoev/mou se/mou se

      as mentioned here?
      http://slashdot.org/articles/01/05/21/15623 2.shtml

      --
      "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    14. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by drauh · · Score: 1

      A long time ago, there was a similar device that you could use on the Commodore C64 or VIC20. I forget what it's called, but it was about the size of a separate numpad, with regular keyboard keys. Each finger and thumb had 2 or 3 keys to reach, and one typed by chording.

      --
      This is a tautology.
    15. Re:Make it a single ball for 1 hand by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      If you want a one-handed keyboard, have a look here. You can implement that kind of half keyboard with a simple xmodmap and continue to use your regular keyboard hardware.

  5. $695 YOW! by Bold+Marauder · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think I can wait until I see it at wal-mart for $99, thanks.

  6. Those afraid of change will die... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    Those who stick to the old ways will die in war. And we are always at war. This sounds like a good idea, and it is very different. I'll give it a try. I don't want to die.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Those afraid of change will die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it definitely would be tough to relearn but you can't be afraid of new concepts.

    2. Re:Those afraid of change will die... by sixdotoh · · Score: 1

      those who are using old-style keyboards being killed off worse than bubonic plauge right now . . .

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    3. Re:Those afraid of change will die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What war, did W. start a new "War on Input Devices?"
      I can see it now... "This nation will not rest until that Windows key is brought to justice!"
      I hear North Korea is working on a secret handwriting recognition program. We may have to remove their Wacoms of Mass Destruction.

    4. Re:Those afraid of change will die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a ridiculous philosophy. A more rational person would look at the cost and risk of change compared to the potential benefit, and make a decision on those values.

      In my case, I don't have any RSI problems, so there is very little potential benefit. Given that the cost is $700 plus months to years of training to achieve a comperable level of capability as I currently enjoy with a keyboard, buying one of these devices would be a very stupid move.

    5. Re:Those afraid of change will die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Then, later, when you're the only one using it (Dvorak anyone?) you can keep on using it because otherwise you'd have wasted all that time learning it.

  7. ugh. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is one of the few peices of computer technology that needs to have a better upgrade path... I mean, I get a new video card every year or two... and a complete new system at least once every 4 years... the damn keyboard hasn't changed much in at least the last 10... The MS Natural keyboard was the last 'major' update to the keyboard design, and it wasn't much more than simply splitting it in two... Barely qualifing as an evolution on the design

    When are we going to have some real changes? I want something that allows me to enter data as fast as I can think... Why can't we come up with a better general input device??? Keyboards SUCK!

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > I want something that allows me to enter data as fast as I can think...

      Since women always joke about "men's brain being in their pants", I suggest a computer-penis interface that would... eh? What, officer? Why are you arr!54%$@#%$NO CARRIER

    2. Re:ugh. by vadim_t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, I think that this means that the keyboard practically reached perfection.

      CPUs can be improved a lot, but the keyboard has been doing its job just fine for a long time. If we're still using the same design as 10 years ago then it means that simply no improvement is needed.

      Other fancy replacements didn't gain any noticeable market share. Voice recognition is still far from perfect and is noticeably slower. I suppose a direct interface to the computer might finally replace the keyboard, but I doubt that will become available any time soon.

    3. Re:ugh. by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      MS did not create, nor implement the first natural keyboard. Check out the PCD--Maltron keyboard .

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:ugh. by PS-SCUD · · Score: 1

      Do you really want your boss to walk by and see you typing "My boss is such an asshole! He doesn't even know I banged his wife."

      --


      "Much work is lost, for the lack of a little more." -Edward H. Harriman
    5. Re:ugh. by mhesseltine · · Score: 1
      I want something that allows me to enter data as fast as I can think...

      So, you'd like a jack in the back of your head like that in The Matrix?

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    6. Re:ugh. by Microsofts+slave · · Score: 1

      Yes keyboards suck, however until they do come out with a cheap (lke $15-$99) inputdevice that still has all the fucntionality and speed that my regular keyboard has, I'll stick to my keyboard. I actually really lie the touchstream, however again, there is so much cost, compared to use value. when the touchstream comes down alot i'll be the first in line to buy one.

      --

      Tragek

    7. Re:ugh. by tramm · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Quasar wrote:
      This is one of the few peices of computer technology that needs to have a better upgrade path... I mean, I get a new video card every year or two... and a complete new system at least once every 4 years... the damn keyboard hasn't changed much in at least the last 10...
      In fact, I haven't upgraded my keyboard in 10 years. I love my Model M IBM keyboard. It has outlasted eight computers so far. It seems that many other people like the Model M enough to write fan-sites about them.
      --
      -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
    8. Re:ugh. by Malc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, keyboards could be faster. Their layout was originally designed to *slow* typists down. As we no longer have to worry about keys jamming, the only reason that's preventing us changing the keyboard layout is historic and the cost of re-training.

    9. Re:ugh. by Zeriel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Misconception alert!
      It was not designed to slow you down. It was designed so that you rarely typed two adjacent keys in a row--which is what caused jams, not typing speed.

      Empirical evidence suggests Dvorak keyboards are no faster than Sholes keyboards (and no slower, either!) given equal training.

      --
      "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
    10. Re:ugh. by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I was talking about the keyboard as a device, not the layout. The russian layout for example has nothing to do with QWERTY or Dvorak, anyway, so the speed argument applies only to keyboards with a QWERTY or similar layout.

    11. Re:ugh. by Bonker · · Score: 1

      This is a misnomer. The design of keyboards wasn't supposed to slow typists, but to reduce the number of repetitive strikes against the paper from the same side of the keyboard to reduce stuck keys.

      Type a an entire paragraph of text and you'll see that for a lot of words, you frequently alternate hands every keystroke.

      While it may slow typing down some for some people, the familiar qwertyuiop layout is actually fairly intelligently designed. Letters used frequently together are placed so that they are 'logically' next to eachother. Most commonly used letters are placed on the 'home' and top row and least commonly used letters are placed on the bottom.

      Are there 'faster' or less strainful keyboard layouts? Yup. Is Qwerty designed to slow you down? No, they're not.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    12. Re:ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes!

    13. Re:ugh. by uhoreg · · Score: 1
      Well, I think that this means that the keyboard practically reached perfection.

      Ha! Hardly! It just means that there are more factors at play here than just quality. (See Linux vs. Windows.)

      For instance, switching keyboards takes a lot of readjusting, whereas upgrading a CPU takes none at all. See how, despite being shown to be much better than QWERTY, the Dvorak layout has yet to gain any noticeable market share.

      And then, there's always economics. The Kinesis is the best keyboard I have ever used, but you can't get it for $15 from the Walmart, so not many people use it.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    14. Re:ugh. by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Letters used frequently together are placed so that they are 'logically' next to eachother."

      No. Qwerty is designed specifically so that letters commonly used together are seperated horizontally.

      "Most commonly used letters are placed on the 'home' and top row and least commonly used letters are placed on the bottom."

      Definitely No. Right index finger home key 'J' is third most uncommon letter. (beaten by 'q' (top row) and 'z'), home key 'k' is fith most uncommon. Their are 8 home keys, and they contain only 2 of the top 8 letters, about what you'd expect assigning the keys randomly. Don't even get me started on semi-colon.

      Beyond seperating common pairs horizontally, I don't know what factors went into designing Querty, but speeding up typing does not appear to have been one of them. While the designer may not have been trying to slow you down, he wasn't trying to speed you up, and he was trying to do other things. From where I sit (using his stupid layout) that amounts to "Designed to slow you down".

    15. Re:ugh. by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Sheesh... back when I was going to school (mid 80's), the outfit I worked for had a couple hundred of these stored in a back room. They were unopened... the company was using the computers for some sort of hotel management software system, and didn't need the keyboards. They gave me a couple of them when I asked, but I often wonder what happened to the rest of 'em. They probably got thrown out.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    16. Re:ugh. by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      "If he'd died while carving it he wouldn't bother to carve out "auuuuuuuugh".. he'd just say it!"

      "Perhaps he was dictating?"

      "Oh, shut up!"

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    17. Re:ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's come full circle with this post and ask how Alfalfa would use the word "dictate" in a sentence.

    18. Re:ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Type a an entire paragraph of text and you'll see that for a lot of words, you frequently alternate hands every keystroke.

      and...

      Letters used frequently together are placed so that they are 'logically' next to eachother.

      So which is it? Are they on opposite sides of the keyboard or are they placed next to each other? Make up your mind, man!

    19. Re:ugh. by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      I agree, and I keep my Model M for some time I think, although I must admit this looks kind of kewl. In a few years, if they start showing up n second hand shops, I'd probably buy one. The main problem for me is just the mouse, since typing never brings me any discomfort. However, when using the mouse I have started experiencing the beginning of a carpal tunnel, but I hve not found a functional replacement.
      btw, when will we see those gloves from the Johnny Mnemonic movie in general use?

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    20. Re:ugh. by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

      If you ask me, the "use value" is well worth the cost. Think about it.

      Monitor: used every minute the computer is looked at, $300+
      Mo/bo+Proc: used every nanosecond the computer is on, anywhere from ~$200 to ridiculous chunks of money.
      Hard Drive
      Memory
      Et cetera.

      My point is that the keyboard is also used extremely frequently. Would it not be worth it to get something that's not just cool, but has many benefits? Now if you would actually like the Touchstream, that is a different question, but if the only thing is the cost, then reexamine the itemized cost of your computer, unless you totally can't afford $340 right now -- that's different. I had to save up a few months to afford it.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
    21. Re:ugh. by EvanED · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>Beyond seperating common pairs horizontally, I don't know what factors went into designing Querty, but speeding up typing does not appear to have been one of them

      Virtually none. Previous layouts were alphabetical; QWERTY just moved some letters around. Look at the home row: asdfghjkl. All letters from D to L are there, in order, with the exception of E and I which were moved off. Only 4 letters of the first 12 aren't there.

    22. Re:ugh. by EvanED · · Score: 1

      >>I had to save up a few months to afford it.

      What's your opinion? The only negative comment I've heard is about the typos (and learning curve in general) when starting out. I'm seriously considering getting one myself.

    23. Re:ugh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We won't have a better input method because of people who think the way you do.

      Think about what you jsut asked. "enter data as fast as I can think".

      First you don't think in letters, words, or sentences. You don't even think in images, you think in ideas, in thoughts. The best communication methods humans have ever devised is to speak to one another, typing is merely a non verbal rendering of speech, and even this conversion is so severely flawed that one has to learn how to spell in the English language, a strange concept for some of us who speak other phonetical languages.

      So, perhaps you can take your life, and dedicate it to finding better means to communicate, isntead of whinning how someone else should do it.

      I don't think ANYONE will do it, because it doesn't appear to be possible.

    24. Re:ugh. by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      Dude. Voice recognition. Have you ever called United Airlines telephone reservation system? The damn thing has you talk and it understands everything! Accents, all sorts of weird stuff... without having to train it for your voice. It's probably done with software learning (their system hears a LOT of voices and accents) and if so, the more people talk to it, the better it gets.

      Now imagine this bitchen scenario: You know how Google has a million billion Linux boxes all hooked into a load balancing cluster? And you know how Google has pretty much become the standard for searching for shit on the internet? Ok. Imagine if some people buy a million billion Linux boxes all clustered and load balanced together, like Google, but with 100 times as many computers, just to impress people like me. Ok. Then, put United Airlines' voice recognition software on there (and I guarantee it's not that Dragon Talkspeak or whatever that $39.95 program is called). Ok. Then, invent a really bitchen audio compression technology that works in real time and compresses shit to 1/10 of its original size without losing anything... as a matter of fact, after compression, the quality will even be better than before. Ok. Now invent a friggin protocol. Here's what's gonna happen. Anytime a computer is gonna do voice recognition, it simply compresses the audio in real time and sends it over to this Google-like thing. Let's call it Googtalk. Ok. Then, Googtalk converts the voice into text and sends it back to the computer. The computer gets back text and can do whatever it wants with it (for an editor, it would simply enter the text for you; for menu selection, it would use natural language parsing or whatever). Ok.

      Who in the "F" word would pay for something crazy like this? Millions of companies worldwide that want to use voice recognition on their phone systems and internally and shit. They'll pay. And because the whole damn world is gonna be talking shit and this system will be parsing it, it will use software learning to become really friggin good at understanding EVERYTHING, including voices, accents, foreign languages, when people "swallow" their words, slang, cuss words, gangster language, east L.A. slang (like "Orale vato, waas sappening?") and all that shit, homes. Oh well... Ain't nobody's gonna implement that shit, so I'll go ahead and do it and get rich and buy out Microsoft and Bill Gates and all the shareholders at 10 times the share price (because I'll have so much money at this point that I'll use 100 dollar bills as toilet paper for laziness to buy a roll of toilet paper), release ALL source code and trade secrets of that company, make it all GPL, and change the company's mission statement into, "Our goal is to sell off everything we have in order to fund the free software movement." Then, I'll do the same with AOL/TW, CNN, Disney, and all the big companies. In fact, there won't be anything bigger than a mom-and-pop shop anymore, unless it's a loosely knit organization of volunteers who are paid for by the speech recognition thing that do shit kind of like the Linux community does. When you buy a toaster, you'll have to assemble it and configure it for your particular kitchen, which will mean at least two weeks of work. But at least everything in this new world will be free and there won't be a friggin Microsoft anymore, because Windows sucks.

  8. Not just for RSI by fastdecade · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the article:

    why would anyone design a keyboard like this? In one simple word, comfort.

    There are also other reasons why keyboard alternatives like this are cool. Disabled users, obviously. Also for typing where you can't be very accurate, e.g. while riding a bike.

    Hmmm wonder if you could type with your feet while surfing during lunch ...

    1. Re:Not just for RSI by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 4, Funny
      Also for typing where you can't be very accurate, e.g. while riding a bike.

      I hope your life insurance provider doesn't see this.

      --

      "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

    2. Re:Not just for RSI by Mikey-San · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I've misread you, but . . .

      Typing while /riding a bike?/

      I don't know about you, but when I'm riding my bike, I'm paying attention to the BIG-ASS FORD BIGGER-THAN-FUCK-ALL EXCURSIONS flying past me at fifty miles per hour. Typing is the least of my concerns when there are inattentive soccer moms fighting with their spoiled honkey kids sitting in the back of their suburban combat vehicles.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    3. Re:Not just for RSI by kaamos · · Score: 1
      Which is why we need to do design something that lets you think/move/talk/see as if you were not inputing anything, but while "reading your thoughts" as to what you want to happen on any wearable screen you can think of.

      Then again I doubt I would like my boss to recieve an e-mail going something like " ... and I expect our revenues to be OH **** THAT **** SUBERBAN JUST ALMOST *** ME UP. I HATE THOSE ... up for the quarter ... "

      --
      In Canada, we don't fancy things like socks
    4. Re:Not just for RSI by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      OK, I can see this mounted on the surfboard, but where is the computer? Actually that would be cool, have a laptop computer's motherboard and other internal mounted inside a surfboard, screen mounted flush on the surface towards the front, and use two special footpads to type. Truly surf the net.

    5. Re:Not just for RSI by stienman · · Score: 1

      "...when I'm riding my bike, I'm paying attention to the BIG-[@#$] FORD BIGGER-THAN-[#$&%]-ALL EXCURSIONS flying past me at fifty miles per hour."

      Dude! I know exactly what you mean! Has there ever been a vehicle more suitable for bicycle drafting??!! Semis go way too slow, but these things have nearly the same cross-section, and their little bitty drivers drive 'em like speed bikes. Since they have no concept of their size, they actually pass close enough to the bike to gimme an extra 5mph!

      Not quite as thilling as the top thrill dragster ride at cedar point, but a lot less expensive (excluding hospital stays)

      -Adam
      Ultramarathon Cyclist
      209 miles in 24 hours
      Florida Sebring
      First in class, fourth overall

    6. Re:Not just for RSI by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's because of this:

      "Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use."

      That'll be despite though, for the /. crowd =P

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    7. Re:Not just for RSI by inerte · · Score: 1

      And when the right light shines, what do you do?

    8. Re:Not just for RSI by AsbestosRush · · Score: 1

      Wait until you get passed by one of these.

      It actually *does* have the cross section of a Freightliner, and is perfectly legal for anyone with a drivers licence to drive (It's at the top of the GVW limit, which is what most, if not all US States rate drivers licence classes). :)

      And you thought the Excursion, or your Hummer was big.

      --
      EveryDNS. Use it. It works.
      AC's need not reply
  9. Knees, eh? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmmm... If it's like holding onto some hot girl's knees...

    1. Re:Knees, eh? by NearlyHeadless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Best line in the review: "Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes."

    2. Re:Knees, eh? by Wakkow · · Score: 1
      Or from the review:

      "Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes."

      .....

    3. Re:Knees, eh? by Crusadio · · Score: 1

      I don't think they're just talking about knees. From the review:

      Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes.

      =)

      --

      - Crusadio

    4. Re:Knees, eh? by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      ... It'll be a new experience for Slashdotters everywhere! ;-)

      Oh, but I kid! I do!

      Thanks, I'm here all week. Tip your waitresses.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    5. Re:Knees, eh? by ejaw5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Read the warning label: "The domes on your orbiTouch do not twist. They slide!"

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    6. Re:Knees, eh? by song-of-the-pogo · · Score: 1

      my domes work exactly the same way.

      --
      soupy twist
  10. Luv it!! by eclectic_echidna · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just grabbed my knees, and boy is that comfortable!

    --
    Antiquated competence won't be a job skill forever.
  11. I'm just not sure... by cageyjames · · Score: 0

    OK, this may solve Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, but now I'll get Tennis Elbow from my keyboard...

  12. Hey! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, a breast-shaped keyboard. Just what a geek needs to surf pr0n!

    1. Re:Hey! by krumms · · Score: 1

      hehe I can see someone hitting CTRL+ALT+DEL during some kind of weird, pr0n-driven, keyboard/breast frenzy. ... woah, I really need sleep :)

    2. Re:Hey! by tempest303 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what kind of boobs are YOU people looking at, anyhow!? This thing looks like a pair of mirrored Logitech mice stuck onto a keyboard, and I'm pretty sure the *last* thing I'd mistake them for is *breasts*.

    3. Re:Hey! by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Might as well keep the 8008 jokes on the same thread :P

      How long before this is integrated into the
      fufme unit?

    4. Re:Hey! by crux6rind · · Score: 2, Funny

      if it made of squishable latex and came with light brown color option, im sold

      --

      d035 7hi5 100k 1ik3 4n l337 5i6 2 j00 ?
    5. Re:Hey! by gmaestro · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm thinking they just need two of those IBM-type eraser-like pointing devices at the top of each and you'd really have something!

    6. Re:Hey! by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      So would the deluxe model have two "joysticks" in the center, and would they be efficient enough to only protrude once you started to use them?

      As with all technology, if they can be used by the pr0n industry, the market will bear them. :)

    7. Re:Hey! by oktokie · · Score: 1

      Oh...my God!
      Now, I can program while fondling a pair of breasts! Great...Thank you God!

      Now, only if my girlfriend new about this new keyboard. I can send messages to my girl friend while we are getting ready to go to bed! Great!

  13. possible keyboard cover = bra by Numeric · · Score: 4, Funny

    i think a victoria secret bra might be a decent keyboard cover.

    --
    -- ladies and gentlemen we are floating in space!
    1. Re:possible keyboard cover = bra by gerf · · Score: 1

      The article says that people have an innate idea that they need twisted. This could be the reason right here, their subconcious likens them to brests!

      At least they don't feel they have to lick whip cream off of them... I hate sticky keyboards :P

    2. Re:possible keyboard cover = bra by robyn217 · · Score: 1

      Now that's a great mental picture... maybe the typist should wear chaps if the keyboard is in a bra.

  14. Ooooooo.... by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 2, Funny


    ....I can see the market now for anatomically correct, er, grip enhancements for this baby!

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
    1. Re:Ooooooo.... by fobbman · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just looked down at the gel-filled wrist rest in front of my keyboard and had a very impure thought.

    2. Re:Ooooooo.... by anagama · · Score: 1


      Might I suggest Operation Infinite Purity?

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  15. Make work a plesh-ah! by revscat · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes.

    So, instead of clacking away on a keyboard all day I can basically feel up boobies while I work?

    Is there a downside to this?

    1. Re:Make work a plesh-ah! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you will get bored with Boobies!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    2. Re:Make work a plesh-ah! by etn991 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...Is there a downside to this?

      Yeah, no nipples.

    3. Re:Make work a plesh-ah! by DWIM · · Score: 1
      So, instead of clacking away on a keyboard all day I can basically feel up boobies while I work?

      Yeah, it's missing some, uh, buttons...

    4. Re:Make work a plesh-ah! by robyn217 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exactly. Maybe it's worth the 695 then, right? Honestly, my mind may be in the gutter, but I did chuckle a little to myself when I first put my hands on the domes.

      Plus, my girlfriend is still mad at me... apparently the OrbiTouch is a D cup.

    5. Re:Make work a plesh-ah! by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, instead of clacking away on a keyboard all day I can basically feel up boobies while I work?

      Is there a downside to this?


      Force feedback.

      You know, when the keyboard slaps your hands away because "it's tired tonight."

  16. Gaming? by jagilbertvt · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to be the one trying to play an FPS on that keyless kb.

  17. Ahem.... by Hilleh · · Score: 2, Funny

    There's a VERY good reason that I like to be able to have one hand free when I surf the web....

    Drinking soda, of course.

  18. Learning Curve by spector30 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone here actually laid their hands on one of these? I am curious to know what the learning curve is. Also, will this cause other problems than carpal tunnel with use over time?

    The other thing is will one-handed typing go the way of the dodo? ;-)

    --
    If Darwin was right, you'd be dead by now.
    1. Re:Learning Curve by dmomo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pretty Steep for Geeks, I'd Imagine... I mean most of us are still trying to figure out how to unhook a bra!

    2. Re:Learning Curve by spector30 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scissors work well for that particular issue. It gets expensive, but hey you get to visit Victoria's Secret with her afterwards.

      --
      If Darwin was right, you'd be dead by now.
  19. $695, that's nothing..... by stuckatwork · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Datahand system, reviewed here has a price of $1,295 USD.

    Wow. 'Taint cheap, eh?

  20. Just put your hands on the domes .. by reyalsnogard · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can imagine it now -- a geek-wife request: Pretend I'm an OrbiTouch and type something provocative to me, honey!

    Brings to meaning to the term 'hands on.'

    1. Re:Just put your hands on the domes .. by stienman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Until she realizes you're typing your mistress's email address or http://www.playboy.com/

      -Adam

  21. Yellow + Blue = ? by Plutor · · Score: 1

    From the article:
    The standard equation for typing has always been,
    Typing Equation:
    Wrist movement + Finger pressing = Keystroke
    Even the entrants in the first round of keyboards we reviewed rarely dared to rework this basic equation. It's as simple and accepted as,
    Yellow + Blue = Green


    I would say that's not universally true. In my mind, Yellow + Blue = White. I call shennanigans on your analogy.

    1. Re:Yellow + Blue = ? by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 1

      If you were talking about light,
      Yellow light + Blue light = white light
      You are correct.

      They were probably refering to mixing paint, so they should say:
      Yellow + Cyan = green

      IMHO, I doubt any non-geek or non-artist type will know what cyan is.

      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    2. Re:Yellow + Blue = ? by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 1

      It depends on which colour theory you are using.

      In one case, Yellow + Blue = Green (Subtractive.

      In the other, it's not true as green is a primary colour. Red + Green = Yellow.

      --
      In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
    3. Re:Yellow + Blue = ? by Plutor · · Score: 1

      I knew people were going to respond to this by pointing out that sometimes Yellow + Blue = Green, and sometimes it equals White. But my point was that the author was using this equation as an example of a never-questioned axiom of keyboard design. This is a bad analogy.

  22. This would be great except... by mike_mgo · · Score: 1
    I don't think the sensation of grabbing onto your knees is going to capture the imagination of many people.

    Now, let me think, what body part, that their are 2 of, would computer geeks love to get their hands on and fondle all day. Hmmm, I just can't think of anything but I'm sure someone can come up with something.

    1. Re:This would be great except... by mike_mgo · · Score: 1

      I guess its pretty sad that in the 60 seconds it took me to write this about 8 other people came up with the exact same joke. Oh well, no karma for me today.

    2. Re:This would be great except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two ass cheeks?

    3. Re:This would be great except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two huge, cum filled horse balls?

  23. Get A Grip! by PRES_00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The learning curve on this device is way too high!
    You might as well use two mice with specialized software to have the same effect. At such a high price, I won't even glance at it. Who will carry such monstrosity to work and home?

    1. Re:Get A Grip! by Chrimble · · Score: 1

      It's a specialist, niche device. Hence the high $$$ - economies of scale and all that.

      In the world of RSI keyboards, it's not an uncompetitive price, and whilst the learning curve is high, if it enables you to work then surely it'll pay for itself in no time?

      I don't think the transportation is an issue. Who carries a keyboard around with them anyway? (not withstanding the foldable palm types).

      --
      Read my online journal: http://chris.carline.org
    2. Re:Get A Grip! by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      I don't think the transportation is an issue. Who carries a keyboard around with them anyway?

      ...You mean you don't!? (hehe)

      -matt

  24. doomed to failure by kajoob · · Score: 5, Funny

    this will never work as most geeks have little to no experience cupping their hands around two large mounds - the learning curve is just way too steep

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
  25. It's obscene... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't believe me, look at the pics on the review and then look at some of the female porn you have on your harddrives.

  26. Keyboard standardization by dspyder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, the only way any of these options will catch on is if people can standardize. Switching between ABCDEFG keyboards (like on my 2way pager and a lot of games) and QWERTY is hard enough. If you have to have a different keyboard at work, home, the library, internet terminal, etc. nobody will ever learn these odd (though likely better) keyboards.

    --D

    1. Re:Keyboard standardization by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

      Eh.

      I'd say there /is/ a fairly standard (note: I said FAIRLY) keyboard arrangement, and it's called QWERTY. Why do I say this? In the hundreds of millions of computers and typewriters out there in the world that most people interface with, the vast majority of those are QWERTY.

      Some use Dvorak, and others still use more obscure setups, but the established standard, if you want to call it one, is QWERTY. Walk into ChumpUSA, Wally World, Worst Buy, Circuit Shitty, or any other major retalier, and all of the computer keyboards you see are QWERTY.

      Look at the keyboards sold for PDAs as external attachments (you know, the little foldy ones). All QWERTY. The ABCDEFG keyboards you see for some smaller electronic organizers don't compare to everything else, and those seem to be going the way of QWERTY as time goes by, because more and more still are used to it on their desktops, portables, work machines, PDA keyboards, old typewriters, new typewriters, and public library computers.

      Those who want to use alternative setups do, and usually have little trouble switching back to QWERTY when they really need to. (At least, the alternate setup users I've seen, anyway. Your experience may vary.)

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  27. Use your feet.... by Anti+Frozt · · Score: 1

    ...leaving both hands free while searching for pr0n.

    --
    In C++, friends can touch each others private parts.
  28. Cyberfondle 9000 by el-spectre · · Score: 1

    This things looks like the interface to one of those 'interactive' adult DVD players...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  29. just out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How did you post that message?

    Are you really willing to go through the pain of typing with RSI just to be heard on slashdot?

    1. Re:just out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Heh, I'm picturing the pencil-in-the-teeth method of typing...

    2. Re:just out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's probably one of those employees who claim to have RSI, but actually doesn't and is receiving some form of compensation or unemployment benefit for sitting on is ass and reading /. all day ;-)

  30. DVORAK by gerf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really, instead of some huge leap, i suggest switching away from QWERTY first. Qwerty was made to slow typing, by making you reach for keys. The reason for this being that the original typewriters would jam if you typed too fast. Obviously, this leads to carpal tunnel, and all that good stuff. DVORAK and some other keyboard formats are made to make it easier, faster, and easier to accurately type. I'm not switching yet, but i'm thinking about it. One of my friends did, and he loves it.

    New keyboards are neat and all, but they're still first designs, first revisions. If i'm to try something new (new to me), i'll wait for a year, and see if it's really beneficial. If it is, then i'll look at the cost, and if it's worth it. At this time, this product seems to be more eye candy and "if i have more toys, i win" than actually worthwile. Point: if my g/f wants to use my computer, do i have to switch keyboards? Really, i don't see the $600 benefit in that. not yet at least.

    1. Re:DVORAK by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      Make the switch to Dvorak, and as long as you are not forced to use any other keymap by work circumstances and whatnot, you will never look back. I can't vouch for trying to use both keymaps alternatively, I switched over outright about two years ago now. Things I have noticed about this:

      1. I have no idea whether it is really faster or not, although the world record was apparently set on a keyboard like this. However, it has improved my typing speed very much, for the simple reason that looking at the keyboard no longer provides any feedback as to what letter is where (I never changed the position of the keys, figuring to touch type). This forced me to learn to touch type properly, and I did, with a resultant speed increase.

      2. Speed issue aside, it is much more comfortable than Qwerty. The more time I spend typing the more I appreciate that most of the letters I use are in the home row. Seriously, it is astonishing how much less motion it takes to type on a keyboard like this.

      3. It took me about three weeks to switch, and more like two months to get comfortable. This is a long curve, and I did almost no typing-related work during this period. They say it takes you longer to learn if you attempt to keep working on the old keymap while learning a new one. I theorize you might never learn at all doing this, since the 'cold turkey' process already takes quite a while, and the process otherwise might be so gradual that you would not see much benefit for your effort.

      I would encourage anyone who sees a lifetime of typing ahead of them to give this system a try - over the long term it is saving me a lot of effort and making my hands more comfortable, far better than I think any more exotic keyboard design could do. What is more, it is practically free!

    2. Re:DVORAK by asherh · · Score: 2, Informative
      QWERTY wasn't designed to slow typing, it was designed to move the hammers for letters that would frequently be typed in sequence further apart. The further apart two hammers are, the faster they can be used in sequence since each hammer has to fall back less far before it is out of jamming range of the next hammer.

      The utility of new layouts like Dvorak is dubious at best, giving only a small improvement after a lot of training, and causing problems when one has to switch between different machines with different keyboards.

      Personally, I'll give up my clicky-clacky QWERTY IBM model M keyboard when they prise it from my cold, dead, fingers.

    3. Re:DVORAK by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

      If you have a girlfriend, obviously you are not in the target market of this new keyboard.

      --
      You need to install an RTFM interface.
    4. Re:DVORAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, thanks for the correction. i'll have to remember from now on that it was purely the hammers, not the typing speed that it was meant to affect. eh, that's what /.'s for, learnging! (yes i say learning in that fashion when i learn something i really think i should have known). -gerf

    5. Re:DVORAK by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      "QWERTY wasn't designed to slow typing, it was designed to move the hammers for letters that would frequently be typed in sequence further apart. The further apart two hammers are, the faster they can be used in sequence since each hammer has to fall back less far before it is out of jamming range of the next hammer."

      You make a good point here, that QWERTY keyboards were designed primarily with the requirements of the typewriter in mind, and not the human who would be using it. And from this bold assertion you go on to insist that it is an equal or better human interface than DVORAK, which was designed after nearly a decade of human factors research.

      Not true. If nothing else, it is my experience that DVORAK greatly reduces the amount of effort expended in typing.

      However, I like your other two points. It does take a lot of training and patience to learn (easy to use, hard to learn, mark of a good tool in my opinion). Switching back and forth between keymaps is most likely a terrible idea, and too difficult for me, but why would you do that when you have selected a preference? If you thought you would be in situations that required you to do that regardless, I agree you would be much better off only knowing QWERTY.

      Keep your model M, my friend. But just because you like your keyboard and layout the way it is, is no reason to piss on DVORAK.
    6. Re:DVORAK by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Really, instead of some huge leap, i suggest switching away from QWERTY first.

      and

      Point: if my g/f wants to use my computer, do i have to switch keyboards?

      Apparently the answer is yes.

      Besides, QWERTY is effectively a standard, without any drawbacks. Get over it.

    7. Re:DVORAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fucking shit dickhead, that's what i fucking said. Why don't you go suck a big horsecock, you fucking freak. Post something positive, or i'll beat you like the bitchwhore you are motherfucker. goddamn cockslut, you don't deserve to live.

    8. Re:DVORAK by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Do you kiss your mother with that mouth? Naughty, naughty little boy.

    9. Re:DVORAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOOOOO much coffee. sorry.

    10. Re:DVORAK by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      I tried dvorak for a while, and found it very comfortable to use for normal english. Linux commands, on the other hand, were very hard for me. L and S, for example, are pressed with the same finger, which means that it takes forever to type ls. I think / is somewhere awkward, too.

      Not to mention that I type on users' machines all the time, and you really can't be switching back and forth...

      oh well..

    11. Re:DVORAK by Miles · · Score: 1

      You don't need to give up any keyboard you like, as long as you know how to touch type. I touch type dvorak just fine on QWERTY keyboards and can even switch back to QWERTY fairly easily. If you can't touch type, you can often set up a dvorak keyboard by switching the plastic key covers on your current keyboard.

    12. Re:DVORAK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But just because you like your keyboard and layout the way it is, is no reason to piss on DVORAK.

      Well, unless he likes that sort of thing. Oh, you meant the Dvorak keyboard...

    13. Re:DVORAK by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

      Qwerty is as much a standard as MP3, JPEG, etc if not more so. That is not to say that MP3 is the best or should be the only format. (repeat statement for other standards) Ogg has a growing number of advocates who honestly think it is better, and there are studies (mostly done by xiph of course) to demonstrate it in many cases. Same goes for Dvorak. It is arguably better in alot of cases. And I like to think that the number of Dvorak users is growing, since I for one switched in the last year, and I am slowly converting friends to it.

      It is a competing layout and I would subjectively say it is better than qwerty. I would encourage anyone I know to learn dvorak, but if they don't want to and want to type on my computers, after a couple of clicks it is in qwerty. Both layouts deserve an existance.

      As for the OrbiTit^H^Houch, I would expect it would be difficult to get anyone who wants to type on your computer to, um... handle the learning curve.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
    14. Re:DVORAK by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the QWERTY myth. http://www.independent.org/tii/news/liebowitz_econ omist.html

    15. Re:DVORAK by asherh · · Score: 1
      My bad for not including references. I've never tried Dvorak for any length of time myself, but several studies (summarised in this magazine article (starting about 40% down the article)) show that the original study of the Dvorak layout, conducted by Dvorak himself, was very biased and that one would be better off doing extra QWERTY training than switching to Dvorak.

      Of course, if Dvorak works for you (and many people report that the change reduces their RSI) then keep using it.

    16. Re:DVORAK by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      Nice article. I'm a Mac user too, pretty funny!

  31. From the comments so far... by glwtta · · Score: 1

    I'd have to say I am not the only one to immediately think of a pair of "surrugate" breasts when looking at this thing... interesting design decision.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  32. hooters! by el_gregorio · · Score: 1
    this basically looks like a couple of boobs on your desktop. it may have some great pr0n applications, but most of us don't have the practice necessary to correctly operate such a contraption.

    frat boys, on the other hand, may soon become 1337...

    --
    "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  33. Boobs != Plastic? by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 2, Funny
    ...I can basically feel up boobies while I work? Is there a downside to this?
    Boobs aren't made out of plastic (at least not entirely). If that's really your thing though, might I recommend yet another input device?
    --


    Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
  34. alternatives by mobiusjava · · Score: 1

    I did a little research before I spent the cash on m y Fingerworks touchstream. I spend about 12 hours coding a day and had finally reached the point where I really needed to get something to help alleviate rsi. I've only had the device for a day and it's very awkward at first, but I believe I'll be back up to 70 wpm in a few weeks. Short of having surgery, or the greatly sought uis of gibson lore, I believe devices like these will hopefully prevent rsi for others. As for price, I make my living with my hands...what's that worth? I think perhaps the greatest hurdle these devices face is that it's nearly impossible to find an outlet to demo them.

    --
    Gotta find my destiny, before it gets too late --Ian Curtis
    http://www.shadowpublications.com/blog
  35. Re:moron touting for stock markup felons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you on about?

  36. Not that new... by klocwerk · · Score: 1

    It's been around for a few years now.

    I remember seeing them quite some time ago when I was looking for alternate input methods for wearable computing.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:Not that new... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Were you going to strap one of thiose to your chest?

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    2. Re:Not that new... by klocwerk · · Score: 1

      lol
      no, was just looking for alternate input devices. one handed keyboards mostly. most sites lump all such devices onto one page, so I'd seen it somewhere in there.

      --

      "You worthless post!"
      -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  37. Follow these simple instructions... by JorenDahn · · Score: 1

    Grab on to the right breast, and... er, I mean dome...

    --
    Blatant self-promotion: Jerek.net
  38. Great for those immobilized hands by gmkeegan · · Score: 1

    This would have been great last year when I had 2 broken wrists due to a snowboarding accident, except for the cost. I looked into a couple of alternatives like the Twiddler, a one-handed keyboard alternative, but even for $220 couldn't the cost for a 4 - 6 week typing replacement. For someone with a more permanent condition, this looks like a fascinating alternative.

    This just in: NabiSCO to sue SCO for trademark violation

  39. Oh no by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    >Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's >similarity to the female anatomy, it's very >comfortable to use. Your hands rest very >naturally on the twin domes.

    Good Lord, what has he done.

    The jokes are endless.

  40. No twisiting! by drdale · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe the "female anatomy" should come with the same warning label.

    --
    This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    1. Re:No twisiting! by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the "female anatomy" should come with the same warning label.

      Yeah, too bad. I learned the hard way.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  41. Nipples by CaptCanuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Millions in research and they left out the nipples. Didn't the QA department notice this minor glitch. Oh, you mean it's actually a keyboard? nm.

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
    1. Re:Nipples by papasui · · Score: 1

      They could add a those thinkpad mouse track nubs to the top as nipples and then you could control your mouse too, although it would probably get difficult if they got excited :)

  42. I looked at the picture. . . by taustin · · Score: 1

    . . . and all I can say is, "Are those tits?"

    1. Re:I looked at the picture. . . by mike_mgo · · Score: 1

      I think, if you can't get a look at the real thing, you at least need to take a look at a Playboy so you can tell the difference.

  43. Another Interesting Keyboard-As seen on ThinkGeek by Chucow · · Score: 1

    Another Interesting Keyless Keyboard. Thought this one was equally interesting, something fellow slashdotters might be interested in if they hadn't seen it.

  44. OrbitTouch???? by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 4, Funny



    OrbitTouch?? Sucky Name. You guys shoulda gone with the more obvious "BoobieBoard" .

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  45. Prior Art? by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Remember Karate Champ (1984 Coin-op)?

    Looks like basically the same interface, but without the flying flowerpots and of course the bull!

  46. First Nickname by kgbkgb · · Score: 1

    I hereby declare the first nickname for this input device: "tits".

    "Are you using a normal old mouse, or tits?"

    "If your tits aren't working, try checking the connection to your computer."

    1. Re:First Nickname by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Titmouse!

      (Well, it is a bird, but hey...)

  47. Oh yeah, sounds great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see, I can type by juggling a pair of plastic tits ... or by pressing a button that has the letter I want to type printed on it.

    I think I'll stick with the keyboard, THANKS!

    (At least the feminists don't have to snicker about JOYSTICKs anymore, now they can have their own TITBOARD).

  48. 120+ wpm by Strike · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I wonder is what the response time is in like one of these things ... is it even technically possible to achieve speeds of 120+ wpm on it? (i.e., is the signaling rate of the "orbs" good enough to handle 8 chars per second) Not only that, how fast would a person's wrists have to move on average to move the N millimeters that it takes to do an average "keystroke"?

    Also, though I haven't looked at it in comparison to letter frequency, their schema for keystrokes seemed suboptimal, but still pretty good. For example, transitioning from "t" to "h" (arguably one of the most common two-letter combinations in all of typing) requires going from up,right to right,left instead of just leaving one dome the same and moving the other. Same thing with going from "i" to "n" (also very common), you have to go from up,down to down,lower-left. It's a minor thing, but it seems that attention to these things could have a significant impact upon the ease of use (less motion required, which is supposed to be one of their big selling points), and the speed at which people can type on it (if you don't have to move as far, you key faster - kinda like how Dvorak is more optimal than QWERTY).

  49. notepad? by Quill_28 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >I have the chord Control-Alt-Z set up to launch the trusty ol' Notepad (no better application for writing HTML).

    Ahhhh, 2nd year CS students could write a better editor.

    vi, my friend, vi

    even emacs is better :-)

    No wonder he worried about CTS

    1. Re:notepad? by discovercomics · · Score: 1

      All I ever hear is 'vi" this and "emacs' that what about PICO the bastard child of PINE

    2. Re:notepad? by cliveholloway · · Score: 1
      What the hell is wrong with vim?

      I guess multiple undo just ain't that useful for ya...

      .02

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    3. Re:notepad? by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Actually i do use vim I just call just it vi

      And no multiple undo is a blessing, for the likes of me.

  50. Slow input by Ozor · · Score: 0

    According to there web site a professial typist that does 120 words a minute will do 50-60 after a few hours of learning. Seem likes a step back to me.

  51. Not correct typing posture by zeus_tfc · · Score: 1

    Typing Equation:
    Wrist movement + Finger pressing = Keystroke


    Now, granted I only scanned the first page of the article, but this statement bothers me. Having taken both typing and piano lessons, I'm pretty sure that this is an incorrect statement. There should be little or no wrist movements while typing. The correct posture for both typing and playing the keyboard (piano) is the the wrists high above the keyboard, and the fingers arched. In this position, the wrists do very little moving, unless you are reaching for keys out of range in the home row (or middle C on the piano).

    Of course, this is not usually how people type. Most people I've seen type with their wrists rested on the table or desk in front of the keyboard, but this is not correct posture, and is much worse for you, as it takes your wrists out of the neutral position.

    I'm just disagreeing with the statement, I don't know anything about the keyboard.

    --
    "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    1. Re:Not correct typing posture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The humorous bits aside, this is one of the few responses that merit reading. As has been pointed out, the correct position for typing on a keyboard, playing a piano, or even playing a guitar for that matter (at least in classical position), is for the wrist to be relaxed and held straight. One cannot type (or play) with any proficiency or speed when the wrist is arched, allowed to move around, and/or any part of one's hands are resting on some surface. One can, however, develop nasty physical problems from doing so.

      Any nun over 50 could have said the same (most likely using a slap of a wooden ruler), but I'll offer my own qualifications as a music major who plays both piano and guitar, and normally types at 90+ wpm with accuracy.

      Developing "technique" isn't fast or easy, but the benefits of doing so is especially valuable for those with physical stress injuries, those who can't type more than 35wpm, or anyone who insists going on about the ill-perceived merits of "alternative" keyboards which, to my mind, are as laughable as "alternative fretboards."

      To sum up: keep your wrists relaxed, straight and held high above the keyboard. The rest follows from there.

      --
      Anonymous Coward
      "You Can't Breathe Properly When You Slouch" Department

  52. $695 makes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    me extremely UNcomfortable! Sure, yeah, okay, I'll take a dozen of them - right after I finish throwing up.

    Give me a break.

    1. Re:$695 makes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure, yeah, okay, I'll take a dozen of them - right after I finish throwing up.

      They pay you for that? Awesome.

  53. This is prolly redundant already by Fizzl · · Score: 1

    Hmmm wonder if you could type with your feet while surfing during lunch ...

    Jesus christ!

    And I thought _I_ was a net addict =)

  54. Microsoft by Photar · · Score: 1

    I always assumed that they just licensed the hardware. I can't imagine that there is anyone at Redmond designing mice.

    --
    He who knows not and knows he knows not is a wise man. He who knows not and knows not he knows not is a fool.
    1. Re:Microsoft by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but they're trying.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
  55. Minimal Wrist Movement? by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1
    The reviewer never made it clear, though he stated frequently, how this device "minimizes wrist movement".

    From looking at the pictures of the keyboard chords required, many require you to twist the domes from 6 o'clock to 12 o'clock. It seems to me that in order to get any kind of speed out of this device, you'll be twisting your wrists quite severely. The wrist movements required to use a standard keyboard seem minimal in comparison.

    Anyone have any other insight?

    1. Re:Minimal Wrist Movement? by CoyoteGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It seems to me that in order to get any kind of speed out of this device, you'll be twisting your wrists quite severely.

      Of course, Slashdotters have no experience at twisting their wrists at breakneck speed.. :P

      --
      Slashdot.. Land of nerds, trolls, and FlameBait..
    2. Re:Minimal Wrist Movement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't twist the domes. You just move them.

    3. Re:Minimal Wrist Movement? by zephc · · Score: 1

      the device clearly states NOT to twist the boobs (for lack of a better word) like dials, but to slide them around. I also recommend this when dealing with women - most tend not to like their boobs being twisted.

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:Minimal Wrist Movement? by josquin00 · · Score: 1
      many require you to twist the domes from 6 o'clock to 12 o'clock

      According to the article:

      First off, the mere appearance of the domes implies that they should be turned and twisted. Every person who stopped by while I was testing attempted to turn one of the domes--I quickly had to slap their hand and point a finger toward the ominous, and obvious, warning label directly on the front of the keyboard (pictured below).

    5. Re:Minimal Wrist Movement? by C0deM0nkey · · Score: 1

      Doh! Thanks.

  56. Grrr..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA You stupid idiot!

    1. Re:Grrr..... by hpavc · · Score: 1

      i think he wasnt disputing that its an input device or that it works, but rather that its not a 'KEY+BOARD' as it lacks keys.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  57. Major Difference by jared_hanson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    User interface is the major issue here. When I upgrade a video card or CPU, I don't have to learn anything new. I just stick it in and my computer performs better.

    Most users want what they are comfortable with. Relearning how to type every two to three years would be a nightmare. This is why applications generally keep the same interface over consecutive versions. Under the hood, they are better, but to the user they appear mostly the same.

    Things are done this way because they work.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  58. Of course it will catch on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least with men.. who wouldn't want to have their hands on two big round orbs all day long. Now if they only made them soft and squishy.

  59. Re:Fuck you, there are popup ads on your site. by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
    Fuck you, there are popup ads on your site.

    Is it their fault you're still using IE? Switch to a real browser and you won't have that problem.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  60. they say by zephc · · Score: 4, Funny

    that the only intuitive interface is the nipple, and that everything after that is learned. Therefore, I suggest someone come up with a computer interface device that is a nipple one puts in one's mouth, and sucks and bites in various ways. Uh, yeah, thats it.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:they say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with cafeteria interface modifications, you can even work through lunch!

  61. Re:Fuck you, there are popup ads on your site. by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

    Obviously, you're speaking to me.

    *loads his site*

    Nope, no pop-ups! Could your copy of IE have some pop-up-creating spyware humping it? ;-)

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  62. David Cronenberg? by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it was flesh colored with a clit and an umbelical cord, it would look like Cronenbergs VR devices from Existenz.

    Oh wait, if I had to grab a pair of breasts every time I needed to get some work done...

    --
    https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  63. Better or just New? by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    For those who have never typed this would probably be just as good as my 101 key. For those with carpal tunnel, this would be good because it is a change. Since wrist motion is not as fast as finger motion (there are 10) it can never be a 60 WPM device (I think), but for 1-finger typers, it may be a boon. For the event where you are holding one hand on a sheet of numbers to avoid losing your place, while you use the numeric pad to enter into a spread sheet - I would say forget it even if the price is only $5.00.
    This data entry machine has a bit to be desired, but does have some good points.

  64. Negative! by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having looked at the how it works section it becomes apparent that this is not the answer. Individual letters are "typed" by chord like movements of both hands. Some what akin to using two joysticks to type. This is neither easy nor intuitive. And that is the biggest sticking point.

    Input devices such as keyboards and mice need to be intuitive and easy to use. Keyboards are very intuitive, a panel full of labeled buttons is presented. Pressing one of the buttons prints the label on the screen. Even very young children have no problem figuring out how to use a keyboard. Indeed the only thing you need to "learn" about using a keyboard is the actual key placement as a QWERTY is not intuitive key placement for the uninitiated. Just watch a five year old at the keyboard and you will know what I mean. Then imagine th same five year old trying to figure out the OrbiTouch.

    I'm afraid to say that we cannot expect further advancement beyond the regular keyboard. It has been advanced to the fullest useful level possible. To get to the next level a totally different input device will be required, not a keyboard at all. The last such step that we have seen in input devices was the mouse, now >30 years old. The next step in input devices will be either voice recognition or some form of direct mind-to-pc interface. Right now, voice recognition seems to be the closest to reallity but, given its imaturity, it is still a few years off.

    1. Re:Negative! by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      First, for the "easy" part, people who can no longer type because of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome would find it much easier. And since either health insurance or worker's comp will probably cover the cost, the $700 price doesn't matter. And of course the price will come down over time.

      Second, my daughter is now 6, and has been typing on her own since she was was 3. Of course she got her first computer when she was 2, that seems to surprise non-geeks when I mention it. If one of these OrbiTouch boards was given to her, with the keychart by the monitor, I think she would learn it within 2 months. And since most of her games are mostly mouse movements and clicks, it won't slow her down there at all. As you say, the QWERTY layout is not an 'intuitive' key placement either, but we all managed to learn it.

    2. Re:Negative! by alienw · · Score: 1

      There is no "intuitive" key placement. QWERTY is not any less intuitive than putting them in any other arrangement. Sure, you could put the keys in an alphabetical arrangement, but that would probably be very suboptimal and would not make it easier for anyone. I agree though, the Orbitouch is a stupid idea, as are all chord keyboards. The standard QWERTY layout is not going away anytime soon.

  65. LOL by los+furtive · · Score: 1

    Give this man the $10,000! I think we've found our winner.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  66. Boobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly what kind of boobs are YOU people looking at, anyhow!?

    I don't know about the keyboard, but slashbots look at flabby man boobs exclusively.

  67. Number of Combinations? by cadillactux · · Score: 1

    Okay, maybe I'm just a little anal here, but I can't figure this out. These two two domes are nothing more than just 8 way joysticks, as pointed out above. So, if you have two 8 way joysticks, thats 8 ways for the left * 8 ways for the right = 8^2 = 64. So, you have 64 combinations to type your keys.

    But now, if you look at at this image, there are 66 keys to press with two dome movements! Any I missing something here?

    --
    Is this thing on?
    1. Re:Number of Combinations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are counting the control and alt keys twice.

    2. Re:Number of Combinations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, not missing anything. Something has got to be duplicated.

    3. Re:Number of Combinations? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And its the control/alt keys.

    4. Re:Number of Combinations? by Kintanon · · Score: 1

      There are actually 9 positions each joystick can occupy. Neutral, up, down, left, right, upleft, upright, downleft, downright. So Neutral on one side + upleft on the other would be a combo.
      Giving you not 64, but 80 possible usable combos.
      For those of you checking my math, Neutral + Neutral is NOT a valid combo for anything because then when your KBD was at rest it would be spewing some character or command.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    5. Re:Number of Combinations? by aardwulf · · Score: 1

      Count again. There are 64.

      OK, now count again...yup...still 64

    6. Re:Number of Combinations? by cadillactux · · Score: 1

      Thanks to those who helped pointout my extreme stupidity. There are two ALT/CTRL keys on each side, with the same positions. Duh...

      ::Hides in shame::

      --
      Is this thing on?
  68. Remember F1-F10 WordPerfect? by cpopin · · Score: 1

    Hey, I still wish the didn't do away with the two-column five-row F1-F10 configuration for keyboards. You always knew where your function keys where. WordPerfect users had it made!

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
  69. Mhmmmm by tomakaan · · Score: 1

    Moving two humps around in a synchronized manner with your hands. What could be better?! For $695, it's like owning your own semi-whore.

  70. that's, uh, dirty? by eclectus · · Score: 1

    Mousing is also accomplished via dome movements. To enter the "mouse mode", single-click the right dome. Movement of the mouse is then controlled by the right dome, and clicking is controlled by movements, not clicks, of the left dome. It's very simple.
    Moving left dome left results in a left-click
    Moving right dome left results in a right-click
    Moving middle dome left results in a middle-click


    uh, middle dome? anyone? Buehler?

    --
    This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    1. Re:that's, uh, dirty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recall, recall, recall...

  71. I disagree by ebuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All keyboards just need to report their keycodes to the machine (where the keyboard driver/definition translates them into the actual text encoding) The techonology has been around for years, and is quite flexible allowing multiple language specific keyboards to be attached to the same hardware.

    What is needed is really a user upgrade. People have invested a lot of time in learing exactly where the letters are located on their particular keyboard. (I know this as I recently had to "relean" the locations of various keys on a Spanish keyboard). Imagine asking someone to memorize (to the point of not thinking about it) the various dual-joystick combinations to type out a typical email. Or if not this device, the various mouse gestures (mouse based keyboard), hand wriggling (joystick based keyboard), eye-control (for eye-tracking keyboard), or other method of input.

    Certainly there will be adopters, but there will be a rough cost-benifit analysis by the masses. Most that will conclude it's more expensive to learn new keyboard type when the new keyboard only offers the same functionality of inputting text into a computer.

    1. Re:I disagree by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      " Imagine asking someone to memorize (to the point of not thinking about it) the various dual-joystick combinations to type out a typical email. "

      I'm thinking of all the absolute knuckledraggers that could enter their initials in a video game very quickly. This might be good for people with low intelligence but good muscle memory.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  72. pipelining by Astrorunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    when you're typing on a conventional keyboard, you're pretty much pipelining your next couple keys. When you type "ASDF" as your pinkie is coming down, your next find is ready to depress the S and ther your middle finger should be resting on the D. You just can't do that on the keyboard in question. You have to use both hands to make every single letter -- you'd think that they would have made the left or ride side movements by themselves to type a vowel.

    1. Re:pipelining by turbosaab · · Score: 1

      Good point, and the article made no mention of how fast you can go on one of these things.

      My bet is 35-40 WPM max.

  73. OT: blank keyboards on sale? by divec · · Score: 1

    This is only very tangentially related to the story, but doeS aNyBody know where to get a blank keyboard, i.e. one with nothing written on the keys? I've tried scraping/disolving the print off a normal keyboard, unsuccesfully, and I've rung a couple of manufacturers who were able to sell 500, but not 1 or 2. Anyone know? Sorry again for the slight digression.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  74. Two mice instead by larryk · · Score: 1

    Seems like it would be much easier and more practical to just use two mice. Pushing both a bit to the left simultaneously... Besides, a mouse costs only a few dollars.

  75. Urban Legend by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    QWERTY was not made to slow down typing. It was made to reduce jamming on old typewriters. This was not necessarily done by slowing down the typists. This was done by placing the keys in such a configuration, such that no two successive keys were right beside eachother. This was the way it reduced jamming, not by slowing the typist down. This is one of the most misunderstood things about the keyboard

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Urban Legend by Knife_Edge · · Score: 1

      Who cares about an increase in speed, if all I get is a massive increase in comfort, that is nice.

      How much more comfortable would your typing be if the majority of the letters, including all the important vowels, were in the home row? If most common patterns of letters were spread out to alternate between the right and left hand?

      DVORAK is not a myth or an urban legend, except perhaps the idea that it is principally designed to increase speed. It was designed to reduce the motion required to type. This certainly has increased comfort for me at least. Speed notwithstanding, I could already type fast enough when I switched, and I didn't make my switch based on the idea that I would be able to type faster. More like, I will be able to type more without my hands getting as tired.

    2. Re:Urban Legend by parkanoid · · Score: 1

      This was done by placing the keys in such a configuration, such that no two successive keys were right beside eachother. Do you not think that would reduce typing speed?

    3. Re:Urban Legend by djp928 · · Score: 0

      This was done by placing the keys in such a configuration, such that no two successive keys were right beside eachother.
      Do you not think that would reduce typing speed?


      No. Actually, I think alternating most keystrokes between hands makes it faster and the strain less. Your argument would hold if you type with only one or two fingers, though. But if you touch-type, it's better to seperate commonly used keys between hands.
      -- Dave

    4. Re:Urban Legend by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      But dosen't that STILL slow most people down? Does it really make sense to move your hands such a long distance for seemingly no reason?

      Even if it dosen't slow you down that much, it still is an outdated design. For the sake of crying out loud, it was made for old typewriters made back in the late 19th century! Typewriters made even in the early 20th didn't have this problem! So, here we are, in the 21st century, and we STILL use this retarted design that was designed to solve a problem that stopped existing almost a century ago.

      QWERTY is more error prone, as your fingers have to travel a much longer distance, and therefore, the chance of making an error is increased. It may be true that it does not NECESSARILY slow you down, but you have to move your fingers faster in order to compensate for that. This, arguably, causes much repetive movement injuries, like CTS.

      Is it just a coincedence that on QWERTY, only 31% of all typing is done on the home row, and that on Dvorak, 70% of all typing is done on the home row? Is it also merely a coincedence that there are MANY single handed words on the QWERTY design (try these: exacerbate, exaggerated, desegregated, sweetbread... just to name a few), while the longest one handed word on the Dvorak layout is "papaya"?

      Sure, it was necessary at the time, but why is it necessary now? It's causing more harm than good. Even Sholes, the creator of the keyboard, decided in his lifetime that something had to be done about this monster of a layout, but he was too late... it was already too firmly established to change.

      Your "debunking" of an "urban legend" is an urban legend in itself.

  76. Yep by heli0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Will it survive the year?"

    Considering that it came out before Christmas of 2000 (hint: ~2.4 years ago), I'd say there is a pretty good chance.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  77. the sound of one hand typing... by ion_ash · · Score: 1
    someone's probably mentioned this already, but Infogrip's made a 1-handed "chording" keyboard for years: the BAT.

    I always wanted to mount a bat one one arm of a chair and a trackball to the other.

  78. moron what IT's about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just some stuff we typed up in a seemingly futile effort to help keep/scare some of US alive past next weak.

    cullaming cluelessness? if that's all you have to give, carry on.

  79. i jousht gpt 0Ne@@! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    1ts gerate!?! i Lub tHoe ease ayt wich i can tiping@@@

    I sugarest erybondy get ron too$!!

  80. Uh, FPS? by cyberElvis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How i am supposed to frag terrorists in CS with this thing! According to the article it is either in mouse mode or keyboard mode at one time. QWERTY makes FPS fans happy.

    --
    My boy, my boy!
  81. Faster input, not faster keyboard by warkda+rrior · · Score: 1

    What I would like to see is a keyboard and/or input driver that increases my input speed by guessing ahead what I want to type.

    Not like Visual Studio AutoComplete, but more like the editor of the old Sinclair Spectrum Basic. There, depending on your location in the program, pressing 'F' would either generate the keyword 'FOR' or the letter 'f'. For example, to type 'FOR I = 1 TO 10' you would just press 'F', 'I', '1', 'T', '1', '0' (or something very similar and very concise).

    --
    You need to install an RTFM interface.
  82. do not twist the domes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the article:

    "Notice the warning label--do not twist the domes!"

    is this bad like crossing the streams? every particle in my body exploding at the speed of light?

  83. CRAP by avandesande · · Score: 1

    This crap is great until someone else needs to use your computer.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  84. Next up: Carpal elbow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    AP, New York Despite the misnomer, the term Carpal Elbow and Carpal shoulder are starting to be used frequently in connection with the use of keyboards in which the hands and wrists make very little movement themselves

    "The Carpal Tunnel is actually a structure of tissue surrounding the nerves that pass through the wrist - There is no Carpal Tunnel either at the elbow or shoulder, though similar tissue exist to protect the nerves."

  85. WPM? by Tony.Tang · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I didn't read the review too carefully, but I don't think a fundamental question was addressed. In my opinion, the thing that will make or break this product for me is the answer to the following question:

    How fast can you type with this thing?!

    The reviewer should consider using the thing for a month (exclusively), and tell us whether he learned how to do use it in the end. Furthermore, he should tell us what his WPM is with a regular keyboard, and what his WPM is with this thing is (in a month's time).

    The assumption with giving him a month's time is that the novelty (for me) would last about a month. If most people wouldn't be up to keyboard speed in a month, I can't imagine many people sticking to it.

    1. Re:WPM? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It can be cool as shit, reduce RSI risk to nil, but if I can only type 20 WPM with it, it's not worth it. We need a group of independent testers to try these devices out, report how long it took to switch over and how their productivity was affected once they maxed out. Thats the only way we can decide whether something like this is worth it.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    2. Re:WPM? by robyn217 · · Score: 2, Informative
      You know, I did consider giving WPM benchmarks using this keyboard and all of the others that I've tested--but I thought that it would be far too subjective. If it takes me a long time to adapt to a particular keyboard, it may or may not be the same for you. It's a tough thing to generalize. Anyone agree or disagree? I can always add these stats to future keyboard reviews that I write.

      Testing a keyboard for a month would mean that I could only write a max of 12 reviews a year. Tough to pay the bills on that! :) But, I do use each keyboard exclusively for a few days (if at all possible) before I write a review.

      Note that I still use the SafeType vertical keyboard and the TouchStream keyboard--I hope to follow up my last round of reviews with a "longer term" perspective (as you requested).

    3. Re:WPM? by jonemi · · Score: 1

      Check out: http://www.keybowl.com/kb/index?page=messages&msg= 192-168-1-9-309e87-f1e54d2e2a--7fec

      Apparently you never get faster than 50-60% of your fastest typing speed on a regular keyboard. :-(

  86. what they are missing is ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 4, Funny

    a joystick in between ...

  87. OrbiTouch by larry2k · · Score: 1

    I only have one hand you insensitive clod!

    --

    The package said "Windows XP or better. Pentium Class Processor or better"... So I got a Mac with OS X

  88. CTRL+ALT+DEL??? by illumina+us · · Score: 1

    Reading the article made me wonder how any true geek could use it. While the concept is definatley intriguing and would confuse the crap out of your friends if they ever watched you use it properly, but how would any keyboard shortcuts work. ALT+F4, CTRL+ALT+DEL, WINDOWSKEY+L. WINDOWSKEY+R, WINDOWSKEY+E, CTRL+C, CTRL+X, CTRL+Z, CTRL+V, etc... what's the use of a keyboard if you can no longer use the shortcuts on it. Would configuring a router be possible? How would I stop a very extensive dir, ls, for tree command. What about catting a HD. Also, PS/2? Why not make it a USB device, it would be pm;y mecessary to connect to just one port rather than two. Makes me wonder if the gaming and IT aspect was even considered when this device was designed.

    --
    -illumina+us "I put on my robe and wizard hat..."
    1. Re:CTRL+ALT+DEL??? by Stalus · · Score: 1

      The modifier keys all have locking states, if you read the part of the article about using the shortcuts. Granted, it takes longer, but it's doable. I don't see how you play quake on this though.. unless you're a major camper.

  89. Prior art... by Bagheera · · Score: 1

    I remember quite a number of years back seeing a similar device that looked vaguely like the upper surface of two bowling balls with finger holes. You used it my placing you hands on the 'body' and dropping your fingers into the holes. Keystrokes were simply combinations of fingers moves back and forth. Very little motion involved, and very fast with practice.

    I don't remember the device having mouse capability, but I do recal the price was right up there with this OrbiTouch.

    Neat concept. Unfortunately, I think I'd get canned for asking my boss to let me have a $700 pair of plastic breasts on my desk...

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  90. umm.. hi.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fps playing with that 'keyboard', anyone?

  91. Coming soon to a Walmart near you! by HopeUnknown · · Score: 2, Funny

    We all know that Walmart is the fastest to embrace new technology...they even have these High-tech DVD's that remove the black bars at the top and bottom of the screen!

  92. I own one - my review by cgrayson · · Score: 1

    a;aw9wekrklwlek sdlkfjxdlj werpiolskdlkdx sf sdlkfj(*)#P(;lkjS lksjLKJ KXLJDF

    S:FL0WI
    "LDJFLWEROIWEUR
    "D

    1. Re:I own one - my review by larryk · · Score: 1

      Now THAT is funny!!!

    2. Re:I own one - my review by CrazyBrett · · Score: 1

      Damn, that's funny.

      Bad time to be lacking mod points...

  93. Er:Oyhecu... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hevyo, jbzrvor tjy cyoj2v! Ncnbwnz rvqwtaz.

  94. Chording? by tincho_uy · · Score: 1

    Just imagine using Emacs with that thing... They'll pry my good ol' carpal-syndrome-inducing flat keyboard out of my gnarled RSI'd hands...

  95. Eight Switches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is eight switches, some rubber, and PS/2 interface circuitry. US$700.

    This is not news for nerds, and it doesn't matter.

  96. These mimic Street Fighter Moves by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, if you looked over the article and especially the keyboard pictures, the movements are basically "Street Fighter 2" style moves. For example, to do a fireball with Ryu, one simply need to do a "down,down-forward,forward "

    On the same token to type a 'd', you need to do "back,forward". I credit the creator of the device for taking moves that are used in fighting games and using them in unique ways(like this keyboard).

    In fighting games, you have endless number of moves, which I've seen many people(not me) master very well in the arcades. So maybe this new keyboard will work?

  97. Old Bras by Teckla · · Score: 1

    At least you could use your wife's or girlfriend's old bras as a nice, inexpensive, effective dust cover for this.

    Oh, wait, this is Slashdot...

    -Teckla

  98. Knees? by stickyc · · Score: 1
    It's literally made up of two humps--it reminds me of holding onto my knees rather a keyboard.

    Knees? Sounds like someone needs to get out more...

  99. Disqualified. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Disqualified for being unable to press two "keys" simultaneously - except of "selected" shift, control, alt. But imagine changing weapon while strafing forward while crouching on that: W+A+3+Tab at the same time. Can't be done. Imagine using mouse "rocker gesture" in mozgest - RMB while holding LMB. Imagine typing a native Polish text in Emacs - where 10% of characters require ALT and most commands - ctrl. Switch to 'alt', type the letter, switch back to 'normal'.

    Plus, yet one disqualifying property - I won't be able to use IRC with that keyboard, because it requires both hands to type!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  100. Karate Champ! by Txurlo · · Score: 1

    Can't help thinking about Karate Champ and its dual joystick control while reading this.
    Just be careful with those bulls coming at you!

    --
    Txurlo
  101. If I had RSI by 200_success · · Score: 1

    If I had carpal-tunnel syndrome, I would wear wrist-immobilizing braces, move my whole forearm, and peck with my index fingers. I bet I could still type faster that way than using an OrbiTouch. I bet that using a Dvorak layout would help a bit, since it's designed to alternate consecutive keystrokes between the left and right hands. It seems like the author of the review was too ashamed to publish his WPM on the OrbiTouch even after one month of use.

    As a beneficial side effect, it might even give my biceps a workout.

  102. Yay! by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

    I have one, in fact I have 2 (one as a spare). Huge, heavy as a rhino and twice as tough. It would probably take a 50 cal to kill this thing...

    I have been using it since it was new (ages ago, it seems) and it has outlasted every computer, mouse, and monitor I've ever had. My only compaint is that I use a Mac now, and it won't work on there. So, I use it now only on my work machine.

    Anyone know of a way to make these things run on Mac? Or a port of some kind? I'd miss the special apple keys, but it would be worth it to re-map!

    On topic for a second: There is no way I'd ever buy one of those keyboards. I'm really into "re-designing the keyboard", but so far, every new design has had MAJOR issues.

    -WS

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    1. Re:Yay! by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I have a model-M, missing a keycap though. The Left CTRL. Any source for keycaps?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    2. Re:Yay! by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1
      Best I can find is a replacement, unfortunately. I'm sure there are some spare parts somewhere!! IBM would probably have considered it to be a FRU (a field replaceable unit) like a mouse, so it might not have a seperate part number.

      WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    3. Re:Yay! by k4w0ru · · Score: 1

      Have you tried using a PS/2 to USB (or to ADB for the older macs) adapter? You should be able to find several with google.

      That's how I hooked up my PC kinesis keyboard to my mac; With PS/2 to USB adapter.

    4. Re:Yay! by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      I am using a PS2 keyboard (a Kinesis actually) on my Mac right now with the help of Radio's Shacks PS2/USB adapter (it was designed for the cue:cat I believe).

      The only problem with doing it this cheap-o way is that the Mac sees my keyboard as "cue:cat" adapter and I actually can't type after a power cycle (or something refreshes the USB memory stuff) until I put the machine to sleep and then wake it up with the mouse.

      Since I only have to do this once in a blue moon, the $6.95 or whatever I paid for it sure beats the $59.95 adapter Kinesis wants to sell me.

    5. Re:Yay! by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      Cool!

      How do you emulate the apple keys? Option, Command, etc?

      Thanks!
      WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
  103. 2 HANDS???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How am i going to enjoy the pr0n, while simultaneously surfing??

  104. iil stik toooo muy dvoorak by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

    ii wil neeever swich now tht iv leearnd hw to typ onn ths dvoorak kybo4rd

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  105. I'd prefer an actual set of breasts to fondle by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    see subject.

  106. Orbitouch Slogan by Benedryl+Patanol · · Score: 1


    1. Orbitouch

    [Hold Left Dome]
    "[L-ul,R-u][L-u,R-u](We)
    [L-l,R-l] (space)
    [L-d,R-l][L-d,R-l][L-dr,R-dl][L-u,R-u](love)
    [L-l,R-l] (space)
    [L-dr,R-d][L-d,R-u][L-d,R-u][L-dr,R-d][L-u,R-d] [L-u,R-u][L-l,R-d]" (boobies)

    And this gives everyone a great excuse to grab a woman's breasts, you could just say you were practicing the art of Orbitouch.
    --


    "Jerk store Jerry, jerk store... Jerk store!"
  107. Computers should have 2 Mouse pointers, Left&R by Tighe_L · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am tired of having only one mouse and cursor on my computer, I think the keyboard should be split in 2 like Either of these 2 keyboards TouchStream ST or, DataHand.

    Then, a optical mouse eye should be under each half, which controls a left hand and right hand mouse pointer.

    So much more could be done with computer UI if we had 2 mouse pointers.

    Do you eat a steak with one hand? And if you merge the keyboard with the mouse you don't have to switch you had back and forth over and over again.

  108. pipelining - Dvorak by JerryKnight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (Trying not to be off-topic for this post, but...)
    This is one of the things the Dvorak layout was made to exploit. For instance, (now is the time to look at a key chart) typing the word "month" on dvorak makes the "nth" basically one motion. The vowel combinations are this way as well. That "pipelining" is particularly good when the keys in the pipe are nearby on different fingers on the same hand. Qwerty does well at cross-hand patterns, but some of those can be vulnerable to miss-timing issues. (The first auto-correct entry is "teh"->"the").

    They couldn't get them all, though, such as "gh" "ct" "rn" etc. but I guess those are statistically less frequent than the big ones: "th" "sh" "cr" and so on... I like the example word some Dvorak article used to show the difference. Excruciating. Type it in Qwerty, then go look it up on a dvorak. Not that we all type "excruciating" that often, but is a somewhat worst-case example.

    Just more shameless advocacy of the Dvorak layout.

    --

    Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  109. Imagine if someone got really good? by anethema · · Score: 1

    I would look like someone grabbing a pair of boobs and shaking them for all he's worth

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  110. Regardless of how fast one can type... by DrewCapu · · Score: 1

    ... using this new "keyboard," I wonder if someone who learns with the combos set in a "Dvorak layout" can "type" faster.

    If this new keyboard doesn't work out, I'm sure they could use it as an input device for some new game or something. Perhaps they can call it: "Boob Boob Revolution."

  111. Another "KeyLess" Keyboard solution by Tmack · · Score: 1
    From Think Geek. This one's a bit less pricey, and allows you to use a standard QWERTY layout or DVORAK if you want. Basically the two halves function like trackpads, they just also have keys printed on the surface. It also uses jestures and has the mouse functionality built in.
    I dont have one of these (yet), and the price is still a bit much for a keyboard, but it is tempting me, and if I see good reviews I might just have to get one...

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    1. Re:Another "KeyLess" Keyboard solution by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

      Search around the past few days in /. I personally have morally defended the Touchstream keyboard more than once since yesterday.

      If you want a short review: The LP is awesome, but not for everyone yet. Not the fault of the LP but so many people are rigidly embedded in the clickity keyboard mindset. It will take you about 2-3 weeks (they aren't lying in the description) to be comfortable typing on the keyboard. It will take 2-3 minutes to master mouse control and basic gestures (read those gesture cards). After 2-3 months you will be persuading your friends to drop $340 and get one.

      Typing can be expected to be about as fast as your old keyboard after you master it (9 months and I am still improving). And a major benefit to many people: it will be totally silent. Not almost silent, but completely, unless you type like a maniac and tap the keypad a little harder than necessary. There are a few keys that you will have to reposition in your mind, such as the left-hand backspace/delete and thumb enter.

      Gestures are the real benefit of this keyboard. The list of gestures seems endless and they are multi-OS-friendly, including linux (2 modes for linux: "KDE" and "emacs"). Gestures aside, the ability to control the mouse without moving the hands at all is invaluable, well worth the pricetag.

      Not to mention the very high geek factor.

      One last thing, the layout you choose isn't permanent in the firmware -- All LPs can type in a number of layouts even some goofy ones like Qwerak, a weird dvorak-qwerty hybrid. Personally I got the Qwerty and use the Dvorak firmware mode, in the off chance that someone will want to type qwerty on it. Dvorak is very touch-typable, but I wouldn't recommend learning it and Touchstream at the same time.

      --

      Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  112. Build one with two Mice and a Driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Couldn't you get the same effect with two mice: one for each hand, plus a replacement keyboard driver? Total cost about $20 rather than $695.

  113. My fave keyless keyboard is speech recognition. by Robotron2084 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The idea of all these crazy keyboard designs completely misses the point. Of course there is a place for new and innovative keyboards for accessibility reasons, but if you want to reduce repetitive strain injury, why not try speech recognition? I'm dictating this right now, and boy my hands feel fine!

    Naturally speech recognition doesn't work perfectly, but it works well enough to be much faster and user friendly than a keyboard. And at $695.00 you can save yourself a lot of money!

  114. Go with Datahands by benow · · Score: 1

    I have been using datahands for three years now, and for the price of the orbit, I advise saving up a bit more and going with the datahands. I have a hard time thinking that equivalent 'flat keyboard' speeds could be reached with the orbitm and the fixed nature of the right and left hands would make chair arm mounting more difficult. (Having the datahands mounted to the chair arms allows so much more freedom. Less of a feeling of being 'inserted' in your workstation.) That being said, I'd take one of those over a flat or natural kbd in a second, if only for the integrated mouse.

  115. The Real Orbi Doll - v2.0 by Dethpickle · · Score: 3, Funny


    I can see it now... combine the Orbi with the Real Doll.... A USB adapter coming out of her side....

    No really, I need this for work...

  116. little detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it won't work for people with handicaps at hands
    stuff that matters, too

  117. Another way of doing this... by mpthompson · · Score: 2, Troll

    An alternative to 8-way joysticks might just be two optical mice. Software can easily determine the 8 different directions of movement for each independent mouse and combine the different combinations into a single key-click equivalent. With mice you would have the added benefit that they can be placed anywhere in front you rather than the fixed distance between the pads on this device. Even better an escape sequence could be added so one or both mice toggle between character entry and mouse pointing.

    1. Re:Another way of doing this... by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Mice (and joysticks for that matter) have a free reign of movement. I'd be difficult to get the direction accurately with the small motions required. (Try it... down and left seem especially difficut to get right.) The review of the Orb makes it sound like the 8 directions are all that it can go, though i could be wrong about this.

  118. are you on a qwerty keyboard? by lpret · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Check out why you're using a qwerty keyboard. It was meant to slow you down so that you don't jam the typewriter. But wait, you're not on a typewriter...

    Instead, we should be using the Dvorak keyboard which was designed in the Computer Age to allow faster typing by putting vowels on the home row and intuitive placement. I've seen some claims that once learned, you can type up to 80 wpm faster than on the qwerty. This is simple and already included in Windows, so why don't people use it? They don't like change.

    So no, we have not perfected the keyboard, it is the exact opposite of perfect, but because people don't want change, we're stuck in the dark ages.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:are you on a qwerty keyboard? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      No, I have rearranged it for Dvorak, although I still type qwerty. Confuses the hell out of people. Even the guy who came to install the ADSL couldn't type on it.

      I've been thinking about switching for a while, but hadn't had time. Maybe this summer.

    2. Re:are you on a qwerty keyboard? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 1

      Check out why you're using a qwerty keyboard. It was meant to slow you down so that you don't jam the typewriter. But wait, you're not on a typewriter...

      This is actually a myth. Check out this and this for a little more explanation. The short of it is, though, that: QWERTY was designed to combat the mechanics of typewriter jams; however, the solution was not to slow down the typist -- instead, it involved rearranging the letters so that keys pressed one after the other would be less likely to jam. In fact, the alternation of letters from one hand to each other led to increased typing speed. Good studies of Dvorak vs. qwerty are generally hard to find; it seems likely that a Dvorak typist is a little faster than a qwerty typist of the same skill; however, the 80 wpm number is certainly hyperbole. Many people end up typing slower when they switch to Dvorak. (How many people here even type 80 wpm? I know I don't.)

      That said, Dvorak is generally acknowledged to be a little bit easier on the hands than the qwerty layout, and so is probably slightly superior, if all things were equal. Of course, given the entrenched position of qwerty, things aren't equal -- I tried Dvorak for a bit, but decided that it wasn't worth the effort and trouble.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    3. Re:are you on a qwerty keyboard? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      According to Donald Norman, Dvorak provides about a 10% advantage. (So, I suppose if you type 800 wpm you'll get 80 wpm faster, but...)

      (See The Design of Everyday Things, by Donald Norman, p. 147.)

  119. A geek's love affair with computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just gained a whole new dimension:

    "Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes."

    I pity the poor wives and girlfriends of the geeks of the world (assuming they have 'em).

  120. Slashdot Classless Advert Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gilbert writes "When I last looked at strange, new posts here on slashdot, I thought I'd seen it all... not even close! I just reviewed a new slashdot post, called the OrbiTouch Keyless Keyboard Review, and discovered that it's actually a blatent ad. It's literally made up of two tactics--appealing to your sense of geek, while pitching a product that no one needs, thereby creating it's own market. To work, these tactics require repeated posting of the same obvious advertisement cleverly disguised as a "news story" over and over in a synchronized manner. It's twisted--but it's better for you to decide for yourself--here's the post, OrbiTouch Keyless Keyboard Review, with lots of inane comments that will be useful in generating our "buzz". Think you'll want to buy one? Are you geek enough to not realize this is an ad?"

  121. WHAT??? by lpret · · Score: 1

    No my friend, that would be very gay. Literally. Because the two, erm, mounds, would then be part of the male anatomy instead... very not cool...

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:WHAT??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, and I thought that when geeks around here made comments about not knowing about sex that they were just joking. How old are you?

  122. touch-"typing" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What about touch-typing? With today's standard keyboards, your fingers can anticipate the next letter that you're going to hit. When typing "the" (assuming you're using QWERTY), as your right hand reaches for the H, your left is preparing to hit the E a fraction of a second afterwards. It looks like you can't really do that with these domes -- you do the motions for one letter, then the next, then the next. Net result -- slower typing.

    The only real keyboard "improvement" of sorts that I can name is the Dvorak layout. I don't use it (yet), but people swear by it.

  123. Twin Domes by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    From the article (page 3):
    "Despite--or maybe because of--the OrbitTouch's similarity to the female anatomy, it's very comfortable to use. Your hands rest very naturally on the twin domes."

    Those two lines don't even need a comment...

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  124. 50 WPM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great concept, but can you type 50 words per minute for at least half an hour straight? I bet your arms will fall off after all that motion.

    the problem does not change:you have 100 codes (letters, numbers, f1-f12, up,down,...) to communicate with computer. if you reduced that down to 8 then you would not move your fingers - stick them on the main row and hack away.

    what's next, typing with my toes?

  125. alias no='ls' by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

    Start with that in your bashrc. 'ls' is a horrible combination of keys, especially when hitting return with the pinky as well. I find / to be in an intuitive spot, as much as with the other punctuation being in the left hand at the top, which I actually like now.

    I suffer the same problem at the labs, helping other people on their qwerty keyboards. After a minute or so, sometimes immediately, I can type at a decent speed/accuracy, but sometimes I brain-cramp and look like a dyslexic idiot. Switching back and forth is a skill you learn with necessity, but it is quickly forgotten. Most OSes allow a quick switch, too, going through a few menus (or use "setxkbmap dvorak" in linux, "setxkbmap us" when you're done). You should switch back and maybe institute an alternating layout schedule to hone your switching skills. At one point, I alternated between "Qwerty Day" and "Dvorak Day," and that, along with having to use qwerty in the labs, helped quite a bit.

    --

    Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  126. Comfort, Efficiency by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

    Exactly, I never expected or even wanted to type faster, since sometimes I type faster than I think anyways. The main issue I looked at was the amount of "flailing" the fingers seemed to do on some tough words in Qwerty. I don't mean the cross-hand timing issues (ie. "teh"), but rather the word fragments that required lots of hopping around on one hand (like I said in a different post, try typing "excruciating"). Dvorak has much fewer instances of such worst-case words, in my experience (that "xp" wasn't very fun.. imagine that).

    To the masses: Try learning it for a week if you happen to find a week where typing is not a crucial task. Don't touch qwerty at all during that week if possible. If you like it, keep learning, if not then switch back and never return. Worth a shot.

    --

    Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  127. Seems as impossible as PS2 Virtua Fighter 4 by zanderredux · · Score: 1
    It resembles that impossible command combos found at Virtua Fighter 4 for the PS2: lots of commands to memorize.

    Worse, I can feel the pain in my shoulders just by looking at the pics. It seems to solve CTS by transferring the pain to the point where the arm connects to the shoulder!

  128. I don't get it. by Black_Logic · · Score: 1

    Firstly, the price just doesn't make sense to me for what basically amounts to two, eight-way joysticks and a kb driver. And why make them so big? The method of input seems like a decent idea, but not for primary kb usage. With mmorpg's coming out for consoles now, this would work pretty well for typing to eachother online without putting your controller down; the PS2 controller already looks like a smaller version of this thing with 8 extra buttons, but much smaller and fits in your hand.

    --
    Ansi's and stupid tricks!
  129. This is for lazy people by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1


    Do you know what would be even better? Well let me tell you then...

    Problem 1: must limit movement of hands/wrists

    Problem 2: people are too fat

    Solution: The Dance Dance Revolution keyboard. Just plug your computer into the large monitor in front of the pads and type your way to healthy wrists and a healthy heart!

  130. Hmm...Windows user at Extreme Tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Upon booting up my computer with the OrbiTouch keyboard plugged in (although according to the directions this reboot isn't necessary, I tend to do it anyway with any sort of install), I failed miserably to type in my network password."

  131. biking and boating with a keyboard :) by timothy · · Score: 1
    Steven Roberts has typed a lot of words while pedalling something which at least *resembles* a bike ;)



    Random entry in the microship chronicles ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  132. Spend your $700 on... by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    A good ergonomic analysis of your workspace. I've had work related wrist injuries twice, each time when I started a new job. Repositioning my chair relative to the keyboard relative to the monitor fixed both issues.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  133. Re:price (Too Expensive, get these instead) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too Expensive, try these are cheaper

  134. Just get a secretary. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to re-learn how to type and they have two better looking bumps to hold onto than this thing.

  135. It's a slick keyboard.. by Planetes · · Score: 1

    I used it briefly and it was very nice. It takes a little getting used to but you adapt quickly and I generally like it. You can get it much more reasonably priced for educational purposes. The computer store on campus sells it for around $400.

    Best of all, it was invented by an alumni of my university :-)

    Here's another story about it from my local student newspaper.UCF Future

    Daniel Davis
    Aerospace Engineering major
    University of Central Florida - Orlando

    --
    Planetes
    "One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promo Ad
    "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitl
  136. Moving two humps around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only they came with nipples...

  137. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Will it survive the year?"

    No.

    But ya never know; there are a lot of idiots out there who would buy it because it's the latest, greatest, new thing.

  138. Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the article he brought up that it resembled boobs... What every geek needs, BOOB input. surfing for pr0n with synthetic tits..

    Problem being, it is a TWO handed boob... Damn it.

  139. Very nice but... by Omestes · · Score: 1

    I hunt-and-peck, A very fast hunt and peck, without looking, but still I know how to type with a finger. This skill has led to me aquire the habit of eating/drinking/smoking with my other hand, I lift weights, I pet my cat, I bounce a raquet ball of the wall, I play with toys. Whatever. So this is NOT an improvment, I actually loose abilities, and INCREASE wrist movement.

    Also, my only problem spot from typing is my fingers, my knucles are trashed. I found a simple logictech trackball (optical) almost completely removed strain. Also it is very durable (about 2.5 yrs worth of nonstop use)and very cleanable. Also with some practice, it is a better gaming interface than any mouse I have met.

    If someone really wants to improve my input abilities, they would force computer store to sell left-handed perifreals[sic], nice optical trackballs, with scroll bar, and 3rd button... oh-yeah.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  140. Extremetech.com Writing Style by iion_tichy · · Score: 1

    OK, so I am pretty tired right now, but please - surely it would have been possible to get to the point a little bit faster? We are living in the third millenium, isn't information supposed to be dense?

  141. Do it yourself! by axxackall · · Score: 1
    1. Buy an LCD and a touchscreen;
    2. connect LCD to to your dualhead card, while LCD to your serial port;
    3. install a touchscreen software;
    4. calibrate your touchscreen;
    5. try gtkeyboard or other virtual on-screen keyboard software;
    6. if you still don't like it then write your own (GNOME?) extension that will not just take a key input, but also intersect all menu and dialog windows to your touchscreen-LCD;
    7. still not enough? watch star-track-like movies to steal deaign and usability ideas of their touchscreen-based keyboards;
    8. patent it
    9. ???
    10. profit?
    Last three points are just a joke :)
    --

    Less is more !
  142. Re:Fuck you, there are popup ads on your site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get over it.
    Really.

  143. lil difficult......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is i was drunk like i am now tryin to use one those things chattin on irc. ppl would think i was more drunk then i really am.

  144. Typos by JerryKnight · · Score: 1

    Search around slashdot for some of my posts in the last few days about this.

    Yes, the learning curve is high for most people, but in my opinion it is the best input device available to those willing and able to learn the skills. Typos in general will be a problem for a while, at first mostly due to learning things like the straight-column key layout and the keys with new locations (backspace/delete/enter). After you master that, the next big problem is hand drift. With the metal tent stand, the tendency is to drift outward down the slants. The way to prevent/correct this is to "center" the hands by putting all 5 fingers down on the Braille dots (on home row keys and the space/backspace keys), then moving the heels of each hand so that the fingers are naturally curved at a comfortable angle. After that you have to consciously avoid letting the heels slide around. Doing this, the fingers will quickly learn "where" each key is and you can type pretty much normally.

    A useful yet annoying feature is the English model auto-correction. If you hit a "crack" between the areas on the pad marked as keys, the keyboard will guess which one you meant based on the previous letters typed. If it realizes it was wrong (based on letters following the missed key) it will automatically backspace and retype everything with the correction. The range that it applies to is only a couple words at most, but it was the first thing to go for me, since I often type on slow terminal connections and I don't really like the keyboard trying to be that smart.

    Really, if you're willing to take the time to learn, and your hands are for the most part normal-sized (Michael Jordan might have a little trouble typing, but it would certainly be possible), then you should definitely invest in one of these. I believe that anyone who is willing to try and has no mental block against non-clickity keyboards can successfully use this keyboard.

    (BTW, if you have a 15" powerbook, check this out. I submitted this to slashdot, we'll see if they post it)

    --

    Catapultam habeo. Nisi omnem pecuniam tuam mihi dabis, ad tuum caput saxum immane mittam.
  145. Re:moron touting for stock markup felons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was Dwight David Eisenhower. Ol' DDE... Oh my God, he was a Microsoft acronym too!!!!

  146. As Homer would say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmmm, boobies.

    Or am I the only one who read the summary post and thought that?

  147. Interesting but... by rikkards · · Score: 1

    I think it would really suck for FPS games if a person normally does the Mouse + Keyboard method.

  148. Please tell me the w stands for "words"... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    kind of reminds me of changing some autocorrect to replace a bunch of intransitive words with "fornicate." Like, for instance, "type".

    I can fornicate at 120 wpm...

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  149. Re:$695 YOW! - $5 at a yard sale. (nt) by lukme · · Score: 1

    (nt)

  150. It is not only that. by lukme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fastest words to type are those that involve only one hand. When we have to coordinate between 2 hands we are much slower (consider playing piano, how much work is it to play with one hand as compared to 2 hands). Quite frankly, 7mm is a large movement.

    2 things I want from my keyboard. First is speed, second is ease of use. Having 2 stubby joy mounds (they are too round to be called sticks) to move around together is not easy, and 7mm is not small enough.

    I want something that you move the device 1 mm to activate it and the entire keyboard should be mapped to one hand.

    I agree with your analysis of the touchstream products. However, I will wait until they come out with a programming interface for it.

    1. Re:It is not only that. by hpavc · · Score: 1

      I agree with your analysis of the touchstream products. However, I will wait until they come out with a programming interface for it.

      what sort of interface would this be? do you want to make a special key-jitsu move that does a normal keybinding/mouse gesture -- if so yeah me too.

      you could do some insane johnny mnemonic style interface tweaks.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  151. two mice? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Couldn't you save yourself about $600 and just add an extra mouse to your computer (not to hard/expensive) and then write a special driver that'd use the two mice together to form the same keystrokes as this keyboard? You could even keep your mouses scrollwheel which I really like and then you'd have two so you could do both horizontal and vertical scrolling. With three mouse buttons for each hand I think you could improve on this keyboards alt, shift, control button issues. Of course you'd need a leftie mouse for your left hand but they aren't to hard to find. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  152. Game usage by shatten · · Score: 1

    Went over to their site to check out game capatibility issues.

    One hand on mouse and 2 for the keyboard??

    I would say no go, however cool concept, I'm guessing Star Trek next sesson...

  153. (-1, Sexist) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe this is called a secretary.

  154. two handed mousing? by Trygve · · Score: 1

    Needing to use both hands for mousing would seriously hamper porn browsing habits ...

  155. man, this is funny by dh003i · · Score: 1

    Thanks slashdot for all of the breast-comparison jokes. I almost fell off my seat in laughter while reading down the list.

    Seriously, though, I doubt that this thing will take off. For something to replace the keyboard, it's going to have to be very natural, just like the mouse' successor would have to be.

    The simple truth is, the keyboard is pretty much fixed. People have learned it and don't want to change.

    And, guess what, there's already this great innovation here that allows people who have difficulty typing to avoid it: it's called voice recognition. There's also even something on the horizon to naturally and seamlessly replace the mouse -- bouncing a low-powered laser off of the eyeball, to determine where the eyes are looking, and move the mouse cursor to that location (the army's working on it).

  156. Text input on PDAs & consoles by Turin · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure I want this for my PC. However, I can't help thinking that there are occastions when I do want to be able to type with two little joysticks.

    Imagine writing email or notes on a PDA or web-pad with two 8 way rockers for your thumbs. Similarly the playstation and xbox controllers we all have would become as capable an input device as a full fledged keyboard.

    As a EQOA player who is constantly switching back and forth between my keyboard and my controller I think being able to use my controller as a fast keyboard would rule. Even if it isn't as fast as a traditional keyboard if it is faster than that software keyboard it might take off.

    What do you think?

  157. An interesting footnote. by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    One of the little-known facts about qwerty; it was first designed for the first typewriters, and was specifically designed to slow down typists, so they wouldn't jam the key arms together.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.