Slashdot Mirror


Palm to Buy Handspring

liam193 writes "CBS MarketWatch is reporting that Palm has agreed to buy Handspring for $169M. If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely? I guess one of my concerns is that Handspring has some really cool features that Palm may want to keep. Any merger spells elimination of product lines. So what gets dropped? Palm which has probably a nicer "case" style or Handspring with its less desirable case but some features you don't find on Palms."

382 comments

  1. So... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    they have Hand in the Palm of their Hand?

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    1. Re:So... by Malc · · Score: 0

      Personally I've always wondered about these palm pilots. Are they just lonely or not getting enough of it? And do they have hairy hands?

    2. Re:So... by The+Dobber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cool way to make profit.

      1) Create successful company
      2) Leave company
      3) Create new company kinda like old company
      4) Sell new company to old comapny
      5) Repeat

      Based on this scenario, I'd expect the next company to be named "Cash Cow". Or perhaps "Other Handspring".

    3. Re:So... by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cool way to make profit. (1) Create successful company. (2) Leave company. (3) Create new company kinda like old company. (4) Sell new company to old comapny. (5) Repeat. Based on this scenario, I'd expect the next company to be named "Cash Cow". Or perhaps "Other Handspring".

      No idea about handhelds, but for desktop OS's I think "NeXT would be a good name. :-)

    4. Re:So... by stickyc · · Score: 1

      Wheras Palm's current money-losing strategy seems to be: 1) Create successfull company 2) Buy another company with attractive software/assets 3) Mis-manage company into ground 4) Close company They should balance out rather well, I'd think...

    5. Re:So... by 2starr · · Score: 1

      I guess Next sort of did the same thing with Apple. :-) So, there you go. Yup, it works.

      --

      "Let your heart soar as high as it will. Refuse to be average." - A. W. Tozer

    6. Re:So... by nanoguy · · Score: 1

      Or if your name is Steve Jobs.

      1) Create successful company
      2) Leave company
      3) Create new successful company
      4) Return to old company after 'they' screw in up
      5) Buy ?old/new? company with ?new/old? company
      6) Make animated movies with toys, bugs, and aliens

      Hey you got to live your life!!!

    7. Re:So... by sadomikeyism · · Score: 1

      "Based on this scenario, I'd expect the next company to be named "Cash Cow". Or perhaps "Other Handspring"." Nah, I'd call it Gripping Hand (that's the one that holds all the cash). Maybe just HandGrip or GripHand for short. For those in the I'm-oblivious-as-to-what-you-are-saying department, catch up on your Niven, dammit.

      --
      "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves
  2. Excellent by jmays · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have an m125 and love it. Simple, functional, reliable. Now with this, hopefully I get a cell phone/all-in-one with all the goodness of a Palm!

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
    1. Re:Excellent by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kyocera's been making the SmartPhone series like this for some time. The QCP-6035 is superior to the m125 in features - It only lacks the SD Memory slot. The QCP-7135 has PalmOS 4.1, a color screen, smaller profile, the SD Memory slot, and a more ergonomic feel.

      My fiancee has the QCP-6035 and it's really nice. EudoraWeb is decent, but I've since installed Blazer (from HandSpring) and it works great. The main downside is that the phones are PCS, meaning that you'll have to have service through Verizon or Sprint. The 7135 is available via ALLTEL, but you can transfer it over to a different CDMA network.

      There's also a fairly large hacking and customization community over at SmartPhoneSource.com, that can give you all the tips and tricks to using your phone, as well as setting up your phone to switch providers, load OS updates (both phones use a custom version of the OS), and other cool stuff.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    2. Re:Excellent by jmays · · Score: 1

      Interesting ... and I knew the Kyo's were around however my comment was not just geared towards the PalmOS software ... but the Palm brand in general (hardware, software, support, etc.). The 7135's are hot though. A Palm/Hand equivalent (or superior) of the 7135 is my hope for this merger/assimilation/buyout.

      --
      KARMA TAG! You're it.
    3. Re:Excellent by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      My fiancee has the QCP-6035 and it's really nice....The main downside is that the phones are PCS

      Are we on the same planet? The QCP-6035 SmartPhone, often (ahem) affectionately referred to by its users as the "SmartBrick", is *HUGE*. We're talking bigger than a Palm III and then some huge.

      My other big complaint is that it is useful as both a palm and as a phone, but it does not quite excel in either arena. A jack of all trades....

      I kept having problems with the flip-cover becoming loose and auto-dialing the last number I had used (keylock didn't help). Also, it would lock up about once a week (requiring a hard reset).

      Having said that, being able to surf the web and use it to ssh into my boxen was way cool. I *loved* eudora mail on it. I haven't tried blazer, I'll have to check it out.

      I've switched back to using a Palm V as my primary PDA, with a cheep nextel as my phone. I don't think the palm/phone/mp3 player/camera is *quite* there yet. Give it another year....

    4. Re:Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we on the same planet?

      I'd like to think so. :) Read on.

      The QCP-6035 SmartPhone, often (ahem) affectionately referred to by its users as the "SmartBrick", is *HUGE*. We're talking bigger than a Palm III and then some huge.

      I actually appreciate its size. I feel like too many cellphones are flimsy and cheap, and this one feels well balanced, around the same size as my old Motorola Lifestyle analog phone. The only cellphone smaller than this that I've actually enjoyed using was the StarTAC, though I usually left it in my pocket and used the headset.

      My other big complaint is that it is useful as both a palm and as a phone, but it does not quite excel in either arena. A jack of all trades....

      I feel it did a better job than the Treo did. The software auto-formats phone numbers listed in your address book so that you don't have to worry about putting them in one specific way...you can easily create new address book entries from existing new call records...If you miss a call, the Dial button calls back the originating number, otherwise it does redial...I don't know how much more functionality you want it to have, but I feel it does a very admirable job. Perhaps if you state what you felt was missing, that could be addressed. What you want may already be there.

      I kept having problems with the flip-cover becoming loose and auto-dialing the last number I had used (keylock didn't help). Also, it would lock up about once a week (requiring a hard reset).

      Hers has only locked up while using EudoraWeb and getting the connection call dropped. We've had it for a year and a half now.

      Having said that, being able to surf the web and use it to ssh into my boxen was way cool. I *loved* eudora mail on it. I haven't tried blazer, I'll have to check it out.

      Yeah...That's one of the reasons I love my HandEra 330 so much. A pity that they aren't manufactured anymore.

  3. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't get it - what does Handspring bring to Palm? Certainly a couple of years ago they had nice features compared to the palms of the time, like expansion ports and such like, but now Palm has that too.

    1. Re:Why? by Netscurror · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, there's one competitor less, isn't that something?

    2. Re:Why? by Tyrdium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe Palm is getting some nice patents out of it...

    3. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      My feelings exactly. Some bean counter at palm figured out that paying 169 million was the right price to gain their market share. It's possible that the product lines will not change much at all, and that handsprping may still be handspring, well... "handspring, a division of palm computing". Either way, I'd never buy one, since my cellphone does everything I'd use one for.

      Oh another note, didn't most people buy handsprings with the "anti-palm" attitude. Much like why most of us use linux. Anit-establishment bitches.

    4. Re:Why? by jtrostel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Palm regains Hawkins, Colligan (and Dubinsky?). They also get the treo product line, which is a nice, functional pda-cell-phone combo, that actually can last for a reasonable period of time.

      The new treo 600 will include an expansion port, which was sadly missing on the earlier treo line. The battery size has been increased too, if early reports can be believed.

    5. Re:Why? by pomakis · · Score: 1

      Their stock is rising (from $12.15 to $13 so far), so whether or not it brings any practical value, it (for some reason) brings a certain amount of shareholder value.

    6. Re:Why? by mirko · · Score: 1

      handsprping may still be handspring
      not sure : if Handspring remains, their price will drop due to the lower PalmOS license fee, so the Palm may even sell less.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    7. Re:Why? by word+munger · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why? Read their press release.

    8. Re:Why? by hoop33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      didn't most people buy handsprings with the "anti-palm" attitude

      I don't know that it had any element of "anti-Palm"; when Handsprings came out, they were significantly cheaper, and had the cool Springboard port. That's why I bought mine.

      Perhaps someone bought one for the cool colors, too. I stuck with "graphite" (basic black).

    9. Re:Why? by orev · · Score: 1

      For god's sake, enough with the conspiracy theory. If you haven't been at all involved with Palm, let me tell you that they are not an evil company. They genuinely try to do the right thing.

      As far as this purchase goes, it OBVIOUSLY an attempt to acquire a CELL PHONE division. They are not trying to elimnate anyone or anything. You guys spend way too much time being pissed off at Microsoft and forget that not every company works like them!

    10. Re:Why? by tetra103 · · Score: 1

      Well, there's one competitor less, isn't that something?

      Normally I'd agree with that statement, but Handspring has had one foot in the grave for quite some time now.

    11. Re:Why? by Locutus · · Score: 1

      one of the things it gets them is some phone hardware. Spinning off the OS division leaves each having to provide their own compelling reason to exist. Now Palm hardware will compete with Samsung, Kyocera, etc. They are not going to like that. IMHO.

      If it was 1.5 years ago, it would have gotten them the 2nd place PDA seller. But Donna announced they were killing the Visor and in 1 quarter they went from 2nd place to 3rd place. By the 2nd quarter after that brilliant announcment, Handspring sales were heading into the noise level. And they didn't even have the Trio out when they announced they were killing the PDA line. You know, I didn't see Donna mentioned. I wonder why? ;>

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    12. Re:Why? by wornst · · Score: 1

      I think that Palm is doing to its product line what automobile companies have been doing for years - putting distinctive badges on brands in the division that evoke or call certain constituencies.

      Palm has recently been trying to enter the upscale business market with its new flashier models. Handspring, has a solid general user base that wants a PDA but not for 500-700 dollars.

      Handspring = chevy
      Palm = Caddillac

    13. Re:Why? by snoopdug · · Score: 1

      You got the Treo line.
      Handspring has been specializing in Communicators...
      and not PDAs.
      So, Handspring will have the treo line.
      And Palm will have its run of the mill line.

    14. Re:Why? by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      if Handspring remains, their price will drop due to the lower PalmOS license fee

      Didn't Handera just bow out, citing higher licence fees? ...And I don't think there's a lot of competition between the two platforms - Palm's only celphone is ARM based, none of Handspring's are.

      I think the Treo will probably be rebranded under the Palm lineup, to go against Siemens/Ericsson/Nokia's low-end digitally connected phones (at a price-competitive level) which it should do pretty well in... Between T9 and a treo's thumbpad, I know which I'd rather use to type in a URL or a email address.

    15. Re:Why? by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      You know, I didn't see Donna mentioned. I wonder why? ;> ...Probably because you diden't read Handspring's announcement...

      Upon execution of the spin-off and closing of the merger, the Palm Solutions board of directors will consist of seven members from the current Palm, Inc. board plus three members of the current Handspring board of directors: John Doerr, Bruce Dunlevie and Dubinsky.

      IMO, Dubinsky and Hawkins are probably the most worthwhile thing they're getting out of this.

    16. Re:Why? by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Conpiracy? Since when is an attempt by a company to make more money a conspiracy? I live in a capitalistic society so I see nothing evil with a company buying out a competitor for any reason, especially to make more money!

      Mind you I'm the kind of person who always laughs when some says that they love capitalism but hate Microsoft (or any company or person) for trying to make as much money as possible!

      (Then again maybe you were being sarcastic and I just missed it....)

    17. Re:Why? by PatJensen · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah? Or you could buy a Treo 180G and try dialing in the dark, with their frequently defective keyboard LCD dialpad. You can also punch on the screen to dial and render it useless after a week.

      OR, you can do what I did and buy a Nokia 3650 and try and figure out how the hell to dial phone numberrs and punch SMS's on a round deal. What is it with these people? Can you just put some easy to dial numbers on a keypad AND have some useful applications in one package?

      I can't say I like my $500 Nokia 3650 anymore then the damn Treo. I'd settle for a $30 Nokia so I can dial in the car. Damn people, just get it right. For $500 I'd expect a phone I could dial.

    18. Re:Why? by Locutus · · Score: 1
      IMO, Dubinsky and Hawkins are probably the most worthwhile thing they're getting out of this

      Well let's hope for Palms hardware divisions sake, that she has learned WHEN and WHERE to talk about product plans. Shifting from Visor to Treos the way she did has only run them into the ground.

      I think Dubinsky isn't THAT great of an asset. IMHO.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    19. Re:Why? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I think it would be profitable if I threatened the CEO's children with death, unless he made his company do what I wanted it to.

      Heck, I'm just trying to make money! That's OK, isn't it?

      If obtaining more money is the only goal, then we're on our way to a new flavor of totalitarianism, because free individuals are not as profitable as slaves are.

      Now that we have, by reductio ad absurdum, demonstrated that it is necessary and appropriate to regulate the actions of businesses, we can have a productive debate about the nature of these restrictions.

      Me, I think that the limited liability corporation and the securities markets should be abolished forthwith. Then we'll see how many politicians the corporate masters can purchase.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  4. Uhhh... by kikta · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "So what gets dropped? Palm which has probably a nicer "case" style or Handspring with its less desirable case but some features you don't find on Palms."


    Wouldn't they most likely use the best features from both?
    1. Re:Uhhh... by Mwongozi · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wouldn't they most likely use the best features from both?

      That didn't happen when HP merged with Compaq. The Journada range was dropped, even though they had some nice features not found in iPAQs.

    2. Re:Uhhh... by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      What did Jornada have that new iPaqs don't?

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    3. Re:Uhhh... by kikta · · Score: 1

      True. But that doesn't mean that it has to happen here. Just because some companies drop the ball doesn't mean that Palm will. Anyone who can list a feature of a Visor that they think Palm will drop is talking out of their ass until they hear it from Palm. It's impossible to speculate at this point.

      The only exception to that statement would be a feature on Visors that has a comparable cousin on PalmPilots and one that Palm has recently dumped a lot of R&D into it. AFAIK, there isn't one. Anyone know of something fitting the bill?

    4. Re:Uhhh... by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can list a feature of a Visor that they think Palm will drop is talking out of their ass until they hear it from Palm.

      Springboards?

    5. Re:Uhhh... by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since the iPAQ was more popular than the Jornada, HP decided to stick with the iPAQ line and drop the Jornada saying that they would merge the best features from both. While they didn't take much from the Jornada, one big thing they *did* graft into the iPAQ line is the removable battery. Compaq iPAQ's had sealed battery compartments, Jornada's always had removable batteries. All new iPAQ's have removable batteries.

    6. Re:Uhhh... by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That didn't happen when HP merged with Compaq. The Journada range was dropped, even though they had some nice features not found in iPAQs.

      But unlike Palm / Handspring HP didn't buy Compaq for its handheld group. I have a hard time seeing why Palm would buy Handspring simply to kill it. I suspect they wanted to flesh out their "smartphone" portfolio.

    7. Re:Uhhh... by kikta · · Score: 1
      Springboards?


      Yes, now that's probably the most likely example of a feature that will get dropped. Both companies have invested heavily in their respective add-on solutions. Futhermore, they would require extensive hardware modification to implement.

      However, it probably would be possible to implement a dual solution. Imagine a Springboard expansion slot that had a Palm Expansion Card adaptor. Or you could add a Palm Expansion Slot on the side, like the Zaurus's SD Expansion Slot, with only a small increase in form factor. For those who want more info:

      Handspring: Springboard Expansion
      The Palm Expansion Slot & Expansion Cards
    8. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't happen when HP merged with Compaq. The Journada range was dropped, even though they had some nice features not found in iPAQs.

      HP and Compaq competed head to head in many markets and had tons of product lines to integrate. In most markets, the currently winning line was selected, the other was dropped. In other markets, where necessary to preserve shelf space (eg. pavilion vs. presario), both product lines were kept. Ipaq was the winCE market leader at the time of the merger.

    9. Re:Uhhh... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Springboard is dead.

      Almost all Handspring products now are Treos which don't include Springboard slots.

      My employer was spending a butt-load of money developing a new Handspring/Springboard based product when the rumor was spread about Handspring ceasing the production of the Visor model line. We sent representatives to their headquarters and we were reassured that the reported comment had been taken out of context and that sometime in the future they *might* go that route, but for now Visors and Springboards were still alive and kicking.

      We went back to work and about 30 days prior to the launch of a product that has now had a million+ dollars spent developing it, Handspring came out and announced that the rumors were true, they were getting out of the PDA business and focusing on the 'Communicator' business and would be selling primarily Treos without Springboards.

      Needless to say, we were not happy, especially since we had already purchased over a thousand various Visor models we had planned to use as a give away promotion on top of the million+ dollars already spent on R&D.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    10. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12-bit screens.

    11. Re:Uhhh... by Locutus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It was a really bad business move for Handspring to get out of the PDA market IMO. I know of 3 companies that were also developing very interesting springboard modules for business and consumer use. They didn't even know the Handspring line was getting killed.

      It's a real shame because SD is too small, CF is not quite large enough for external connectors/cables. Springboard was just the right size and the PDA was respectably priced.

      Handspring was the #2 PDA on the market at the time of the shareholders announcement. In 3 months, they were #3( Sony #2 ) and another 3 months later it was all over.

      After the first "Connected Device" was shipped, they even tried selling a "Connected Device" that wasn't "Connected"( remember, they were out of the PDA market and into the "Connected Device" marekt ). But it was too late. The Handspring name wasn't worth what it used to be.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    12. Re:Uhhh... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Handspring PDAs were great, but I didn't really like Springboards that much - the memory expansions were ridiculously expensive compared to CF (or anything else), but are a must for any medical use. A cheap or bundled adapter for a small flash card (say, pop it open and drop a SD in and forget about it) would have been cool, though.

    13. Re:Uhhh... by stripes · · Score: 1
      Yes, now that's probably the most likely example of a feature that will get dropped. Both companies have invested heavily in their respective add-on solutions. Futhermore, they would require extensive hardware modification to implement.

      The SpringBoard was not the result of massave R&D. It was the raw CPU bus (driven whenever the CS2 aor CS3 lines were driven), some power lines, a mic line and the existing CF connector (I'm not even sure it was keyed diffrently).

      Trvial to do on any CPU with the CPU32 bus. A giant pain on any other CPU. Basically it wouldn't be seen on an ARM baised Palm (and hell, USB would be better in most ways! CompactPCI would definitly be better -- at least with yet another form factor)

    14. Re:Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get those reassurances in writing in any form, or what? Seems like a civil suit might be in order for you guys. That's a chunk of change to blow on a LIE of theirs.

    15. Re:Uhhh... by Locutus · · Score: 1

      a springboard module with a CF opening WAS available( it was just coming to market ). I saw it. They could have saved their company and supported the device by just keeping Dubinsky's mouth shut. oh well.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    16. Re:Uhhh... by FredKiesche · · Score: 1

      Springboard is dead...and that's why I bought a Sony Clie when my Handspring Pro died rather than a Treo. I had invested in some modules (personally), as well as flash memory and the like. I thought the Springboard idea was a good one. By eliminating it, Handspring eliminated me as a customer when it came time to buy a new unit. Given the good service I've had with many Sony units over the years, I feel I can trust them **not** to eliminate the Memory Stick format in a year or so!

      --
      "Ah Mr. Gibbon, another damned, fat, square book. Always, scribble, scribble, scribble, eh?" (The Duke of Gloucester, o
  5. Sony Clie for me. by NetDanzr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I use my PDA mainly as an e-book reader. Unlike Palm, Clie has this cool scrolling wheel, which makes all the difference for me. A perfect example of a small innovation that can (and should) mean big bucks for the company.

    1. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find the four-way button on the Palm just as easy to use as a scroll wheel.

    2. Re:Sony Clie for me. by nautical9 · · Score: 1

      The Handspring Treo has a similar scroll wheel on the side - and the usual Palm scroll buttons on the front. (Plus, of course, it's a mobile phone too - GSM or PCS, depending on the model). Personally, I can't live without mine.

    3. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been wanting to use my Clie as an e-book reader. What software do you recommend, and where do you get your e-books?

    4. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Palm Reader and Mobipocket. Its hard to find all of the books you want to read in one format, so you end up using more than one reader. Try fictionwise.com for eBooks.

    5. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like MobiPocket (www.mobipocket.com), they have a nice selection of free books, the Baen collection is available in this format, and they can handle hi-res fonts in version 4.6 (plus they have a free version of both the reader and publisher for personal use, and a decent library of pay books)

    6. Re:Sony Clie for me. by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was lucky to score an early version of TomeRaider. This allows me to take (or create) any .txt file and export it as a Palm database file.

    7. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      So does makeztxt, and it's free, and the Weasel reader works great. I download stuff from project guttenberg and read in bed. It's great with a back-lit monocrhome palm. The screen is good enough that it doesn't bother me in the least (which kidna surprised me!)

    8. Re:Sony Clie for me. by dkuntz · · Score: 2, Informative

      I second.. or fifth, or whatever...I have 2 Clies... even their lower end ones are Highrez (my newer one retails for $129). I use my other one as a mp3 player. To get those on a Palm, I would have had to spend like $299 or more.

      --
      OMG... I have a sig?
    9. Re:Sony Clie for me. by jmu1 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the Memory Stick and the screen that is leaps and bounds better than the comparable(in price) offerings from Palm or Handspring.

    10. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're paying big bucks to license the scrollwheel from RIM, btw.

    11. Re:Sony Clie for me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a better alternative: RepliGO

      This app is great for converting PDFs while preserving most of its structure. It works through a virtual printer driver which converts and installs the PDF (or any printable document) into Palm format.

      One of the coolest uses of RepliGo is having a full sized periodic table in your pocket.

    12. Re:Sony Clie for me. by jonabbey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone else already mentioned the MobiPocket Reader, which includes some phenomenal high-res fonts for the Clié. Baen Books has much of their catalogue available for download in the MobiPocket format, including their Baen Free Library. The Free Library contains dozens of books, many by established authors. That includes the first couple of books in the Honor Harrington series.

      Beyond that, I like the Weasel Reader, an ebook reader dedicated to reading Project Gutenberg etexts.

      Both MobiPocket Reader and Weasel Reader support the jogwheel, Memory Stick, and hi-res fonts on the Clié. Highly recommended.

    13. Re:Sony Clie for me. by BrynM · · Score: 1

      I looked at easyPDB. It may not be the prettiest app, but it's a small binary and does the same thing. I don't like how line returns end up in PDB files though, so now I use Acrobat and PDF files when I want the formatting to stay formatted. It does a good job, but won't bookmark. Does anyone know why Adobe hasn't built bookmarking into Acrobat for Palm OS?

      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    14. Re:Sony Clie for me. by aap · · Score: 1

      Plucker! www.plkr.org

    15. Re:Sony Clie for me. by monopole · · Score: 1

      I use iSilo for my stuff, it supports the Clie high res modes, memory stick and thumbweel and is very good at capturing mulipage html content. I use it in conjunction with sitescooper to capture newspages from the web each day.

  6. Other article ... by jmays · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yahoo is carrying an article , too.

    --
    KARMA TAG! You're it.
  7. let's face it by VAXGeek · · Score: 0, Interesting

    what would you rather have, a crappy PalmOS machine, or an iPaq that can run WinCE/Linux? some PPC machines can be had pretty cheaply, like $100 over the cost of a Palm. Palm is going to tank pretty soon unless they put some real hardware in their machines.

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    1. Re:let's face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      PPC more then a Palm.


      Not really. Early May purchased a Toshiba e335 for $300.00. However, it had a $100 Office Max Rebate and a $100 Toshiba Rebate. With tax included and after rebates that worked out to be $118.


      Palm cheaper then PPC? Not anymore they're in the same ranges.

    2. Re:let's face it by Drakonian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends if you want to carry around a little computer or a PDA. No doubt that PPCs have more features, but they are considerably bigger and suck up the batteries much faster. I prefer PDAs as small as possible - I like the Palm V form factor.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    3. Re:let's face it by saphena · · Score: 1

      I prefer to have a truly excellent PalmOS *PDA* rather than a crappy one running some sort of cut-down Windows. The only possible advantage to an iPaq is that it "looks like" a Windows PC.

    4. Re:let's face it by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Palm is going to tank pretty soon unless they put some real hardware in their machines.

      What, like an Intel XScale 400mhz processor in a unit that has a better screen and lower cost than a comparable PocketPC device?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    5. Re:let's face it by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That depends on what you want from your PDA. I got a Palm M515 for under $200 recently. It's great and does everything I need. Some people seem to want to use their PDA as a laptop replacement, in which case it probably wouldn't suit their needs. Personally I prefer using my laptop for those kinds of things because it has reasonably sized screen and something that resembles a real keyboard.

    6. Re:let's face it by Fringe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, we have two ipaqs and two Palms. My daily driver is a Palm IIIc, a 20MHz 8MB 160x160 psuedo-antique, while the much newer, faster, hi-rez, 32MB iPaqs sit unused. (The wife has the Zire 71.)

      The short answer is, I want what works best on the road for on-the-fly PDA functions. That's Palm. Not Linux, not WinCE, just Palm. And I say this as a developer for all three, whose current day-job is embedded Linux and who has done commercial WinCE work.

      The same thing you like about Linux over Windows (excepting open-source, i.e. efficiency, lack of bloat), you dislike about Palm over Linux. It's a specialized system for a specialized purpose, and it works exceptionally well for that. One OS is not ideal for every platform and application!

    7. Re:let's face it by gergi · · Score: 1

      Easy... a real PDA running PalmOS rather than a crappy iPaq running WinCE. The iPaq is only nice if money is no object and you have time to remove WinCE and replace it with Linux. By then, you might as well have purchased a Zaurus...

      --
      Nosce te Ipsum
    8. Re:let's face it by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Try iPaq H1910, then. Smaller than most palms, 200MHz XScale (overclockable to 300MHz), 64MB, a beautiful screen..

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    9. Re:let's face it by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      What, like an Intel XScale 400mhz processor in a unit that has a better screen and lower cost than a comparable PocketPC device?

      That's simply not true. iPaq H3955 has the same screen, the same processor, and more of usable RAM, for $100 less.

      And, H1910 is $200 less for a thinner, lighter PDA with the same amount of RAM, same screen, and a slightly slower CPU.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    10. Re:let's face it by awakened+tech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why iPAQ (and all top end PDA) sales are falling and the only area of growth is the sub-$150 dollar, cheap and simple end of the market.

      I've got a Clie SL10, not very powerful (to say the least) but it does pretty much everything I need (store contacts and appointments, make the odd note, play the odd game to speed the commute home). The only advantage the iPAQ I have at work has is that it can play MP3 and WMA, but the battery doesn't last long so I'd still end up using my MP3 player anyway.

    11. Re:let's face it by PeterChenoweth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why pay Microsoft/HP cash for the OS license just to reflash it with Linux? I've been happily using my Sharp Zaurus 5500 for months. Sharp also just released a major software revision for the 5500 based on the new 5600 software and it's improved the Zaurus quite a bit. Oh yeah, and the upgrade was free - unlike the $29.99 I spent to upgrade my iPAQ 3630 from PPC2000 to PPC2002.

    12. Re:let's face it by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > That's simply not true. iPaq H3955 has the same screen, the same
      > processor, and more of usable RAM, for $100 less.

      You misspelled "an inferior screen" unless you think that the iPaq's 240x320 screen has the same resolution as the Palm's 320x320 screen (hint: for every 3 iPaq pixels, there are four Palm pixels).

      --
      -JC

    13. Re:let's face it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for geeks like most of us, a pocketPC is more desirable. but for the general population, palms are. the PDA functions of the palm are much easier to use for the average person. they do less, but because of that they are easy to use. not so many complex confusing icons on the interface. imho.

    14. Re:let's face it by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      One thing that is irritating me is that just as interesting CompactFlash peripherals are starting to become available the handheld manufacturers are abandoning the format in favor of Secure Digital.

      If all I wanted was memory that would not be a biggie, but I want to have a handheld with a GPS unit for the car. i don't want to pay Garmin $2000 for their vastly overpriced crap. You might think you can buy a Garmin unit for $100 but it does not navigate, the navigating units cost $$$ and you have to buy the maps at rip off prices.

      Or I can get a PocketPC with a GPS card for $500 and then buy Microsoft streets for $20. If I can get a big enough memory card I should be able to get the entire US onto the device.

      Anyone tried this sort of thing?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    15. Re:let's face it by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true. iPaq H3955 has the same screen, the same processor, and more of usable RAM, for $100 less.

      And, H1910 is $200 less for a thinner, lighter PDA with the same amount of RAM, same screen, and a slightly slower CPU


      Neither of those has WiFi, which means they aren't comparable devices. The Tungsten C is the most expensive Palm device available, and you're comparing it to lower-end PPC units.

      The Zire 71 is is thinner, lighter, and cheaper too.

      And puh-leaze -- these units DO NOT all have the same screen. PDA screens are not all created equal, by any means. Sony Clies have had better screens than HP or Compaq for years, and the current Palm screens are even better. A 320x320 screen with brilliant backlighting that lasts for several days on a single charge is a little bit better thana 320x240 screen with mediocre brightness that can barely last a day before it goes tits up.

      The RAM argument is pointless - anybody who has used both devices knows the huge difference here. 64MB on a Palm OS device is about the same as 256 MB of RAM on a PPC device in terms of useful storage.

      I didn't realize slashdot folks were such big fans of bloated programming that requires massive hardware and battery power to make up for it.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    16. Re:let's face it by jtrostel · · Score: 1

      I have had both Palm PDAs (Visors and Treos) and a Zaurus running Linux.

      I enjoy running Linux on the desktop and on my servers, but found the Zaurus overkill for what I wanted in a palm-sized unit.

      I want a device that will last for _days_ on a charge, plug into a regular wall socket to recharge, keep my appointments and contacts, get my e-mail and net access (nearly) anywhere (not just where there is WiFi or BT), let me get on my other machines in a pinch, play a game if I'm bored, etc.

      Of course, with my little treo, I can do all that and more.. IM, Browser, e-mail, PQA's, Word/Excel, E-Books, Games, ssh, IRC, Games, DBs, etc.

    17. Re:let's face it by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      I have both the "Crapy" Palm os machine and the "cool" Linux machine.

      The Linux machine runs around $400 (I got it on closeout for $200 but I'm cheap that way) I couldn't get the source for the Linux desktop and the binary dosen't work for me.
      The add on hardware is also fairly expensive.

      WinCE PDAs run you $200 and up
      Nice and powerful I could never quite use one long enough to crash it.
      (I find it intresting that I have crashed my Palm a number of times but it comes back gracefully so it's never been a big issue)
      It's simply painful to use so I don't.

      PalmOs runs you from $100 new.
      The biggest issues are stability related. The add on hardware is cheap there is an open source manager (unlike Linux who has only a closed source binary ironicly).
      The real issue is that Palm Os is known as the Dragonball based PDA. While there is a Arm based Palm Os it's looked on like CP/M 68 was back in the day when CP/M was replaced by MsDos.
      People want more powerful devices and they will pay for it. Even if they have to fork over as much as $800 for a PDA they will do it.

      I'm happy with my Handspring visor Neo. The one Handspring discontinued not to long ago.
      But my next PDA is going to be... yep I'm sticking with the Dragonball processor....
      A Dragonix...

      It's not so much that anything's wrong with PalmOs but that people are already familure with it as a low end PDA.
      When WinCE is $100 I know a little kid who'll be happy. Not becouse he can afford a $100 WinCE but he's waiting for PalmOs PDAs to drop to $50.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    18. Re:let's face it by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that if you check around compaq/hp's warehouse site, whenever they release a new ipaq, the previous models that they have overstocked get a major price reduction. I got two 3800 series for 400 bucks total when the 3900's came out. So now my girlfriend and I both have one, and she has no excuse when it comes to appointments she makes. She can't tell me about them when I am busy and I forget, and she can't forget to tell me about them.

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    19. Re:let's face it by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      You misspelled "an inferior screen" unless you think that the iPaq's 240x320 screen has the same resolution as the Palm's 320x320 screen (hint: for every 3 iPaq pixels, there are four Palm pixels).

      True, however it is worth noting that there isn't a great deal of applications that support this screen size (as a percentage of available software).

      Those that don't get their 160x160 display scaled up to twice the size (although I think the Clié line does some fancy smoothing).

      Which isn't quite so good when you think that all PPC applications support 240x320.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    20. Re:let's face it by zfalcon · · Score: 1
      And puh-leaze -- these units DO NOT all have the same screen. PDA screens are not all created equal, by any means. Sony Clies have had better screens than HP or Compaq for years, and the current Palm screens are even better. A 320x320 screen with brilliant backlighting that lasts for several days on a single charge is a little bit better thana 320x240 screen with mediocre brightness that can barely last a day before it goes tits up.

      Screen is definitely very important. The Zaurus C7xx series has a beautiful 640x480 screen.

    21. Re:let's face it by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Some of us got these devices originally to do other things than store calender and contact info.

      64 megabytes is useless when you want to listen to mp3s or watch movies on your PDA.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    22. Re:let's face it by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      Neither of those has WiFi, which means they aren't comparable devices.

      They were comparable in the other specs that the original poster listed as advantages of the Tungsten device. You are right, H1910 doesn't have WiFi, and it's up to one's personal choice/use to decide whether the extra $200 is worth the difference.

      The Zire 71 is is thinner, lighter, and cheaper too.

      That, again, is not true. Zire 71 is thicker, heavier, and has the same price as H1910. It also has a slower CPU, but has a 1MP camera built in, which is the only feature bonus over the H1910.

      And puh-leaze -- these units DO NOT all have the same screen. PDA screens are not all created equal, by any means. Sony Clies have had better screens than HP or Compaq for years, and the current Palm screens are even better.

      Yes, that used to be true. But, now everybody uses the same transflective TFT screens, and they all look fantastic.

      My experience with the batter life with H1910 has been nothing but good. I use it all the time, and I only have to recharge it once a week.

      The RAM argument is pointless - anybody who has used both devices knows the huge difference here. 64MB on a Palm OS device is about the same as 256 MB of RAM on a PPC device in terms of useful storage.

      Altough you have a point here, Zire only packs 16MB or RAM, which would make it comparable to H1910's 64MB of "PPC Ram". The ram issue, though, only comes into play if you're installing applications that take more than the available amount of ram, which is not a common occurence. The RAM is usually used up by large data files, such as pictures, dictionaries, music, etc., and those use the same amount of memory on both OSes.

      So, other than the low-res camera, and, potentially, some personal preference/comfort of Palm OS, I don't see any advantage of the low-end Zire over the low-end iPaq.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  8. choose, but choose wisely.... by sweeney37 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely?

    I would avoid both of them entirely, but not because of the sale, but because of the clunky design, smaller screen size, and general lack of innovation. With Handspring came along, it pushed Palm to adapt and made their products cheaper, and smaller. But overall both of their products we're basically the same. I mean how long did it take for Palm to develop USB functionality, even Handsprings came with it right out of the box?

    Then the Palm OS market changed when Sony came along, they pulled the 6 Million Dollar Man on the competitors. They made their handheld, faster, smaller and added functionality the others were lacking. I did my research and at the time bought the Clie PEG-SL10 and I haven't looked back. Palm may of been one of the originators but Sony has been the innovator.

    I think this sale is bad for everyone, competition always spurs more innovation.

    Mike

    1. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I did my research and at the time bought the Clie PEG-SL10 and I haven't looked back.

      I also did some research -- for over a year -- and decided on a Palm Tungsten T over anything from Sony. I never considered a PocketPC.

      Although Sony did have some very cool features, they all failed the "hand test". As soon as I actually held one in my hand, it felt sort of flimsy and toy-like. I'm left-handed, and it utterly failed the "hold it in the other hand" test. The Tungsten T passed this test for me, and with flying colours.

      Over the last few weeks, it has passed all my usability tests, as well. This is where the Sharp Zaurus failed for me; it passed the hand test nicely, but as soon as I used it for any length of time, it's value decrease to almost 0, and off to eBay it went.

      Of course, my decision was really made for me this time 'round: I use a Mac at home, and Palm is the only company that really supports Mac OS X.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    2. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by roalt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Some months ago, I thought the same as you: Palm being behind Sony on their hardware developments. However, the latest models, the Zire 71 and the Tungsten C have an excellent screen with great back-lighting (much better than the Tungsten T!).

      Further more, they both run PalmOS 5 and are much faster using the RISC processors instead of the old 680x0 dragonball chips.

      Actually, I have a difficult time choosing for either the one which is cheap (Zire 71, 300 Euro's) and has stereo sound and a basic digicam or for the one that has wifi, and a nice keyboard and is more expensive (TC, 500 Euro's)...

    3. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've had a couple of Palms and a Sony Clie... today I carry around an "old school" DayRunner. I liked the palms, and loved the Clie, but I could not get used to using them over the long term.

      I don't think I'll ever buy another PDA unless someone releases one that has a form factor similar to Apple's Newton Messagepad. It's a little bigger than most PDA's but he screen size and form factor are pretty perfect for my needs.

    4. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by Planesdragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then the Palm OS market changed when Sony came along, they pulled the 6 Million Dollar Man on the competitors. They made their handheld, faster, smaller and added functionality the others were lacking. I did my research and at the time bought the Clie PEG-SL10 and I haven't looked back. Palm may of been one of the originators but Sony has been the innovator.

      I've got a PEG-S360, and the headache of finding anything that works with it (like, oh, screen covers) has convinced me never to buy another Sony PDA.

      Sure, the jog-dial is nice, but it doesn't make up for the absolute incompatability with anything of a "standard" palm shape. It wouldn't be so bad if Sony was consistent--but of the several Sony PDAs at the local stores, no two use the same form factor for anything more than the memory stick.

      If I was purchasing a PDA right now, I'd pick up the new Zire from Palm. Form factor's just about right, the camera's nicely integrated, and it's got that spiffy five-way button thing.

      (Yeah, and Sony has a few models with comparable features--for 150% - 300% of the cost.)

      I think this sale is bad for everyone, competition always spurs more innovation.

      Handspring hasn't really been competing for a few years now. Palm buying them is like AOL buying Time-Warner--the market will get a new big player, but it's not about to go away. (Heck, competition between Sony and "nuPalm" will be enough to spur innovation, even if every other Palm OS manufacturer went out of business.)

    5. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Was it graffiti that drove you away? Or the fact that the PDA was big and bulky and you didn't want to have to carry around a cell phone AND a PDA?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    6. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by jamesoutlaw · · Score: 1

      I think that the biggest problems were the screen's resolution and size. I did not have much of a problem entering information using Graffiti, but even with my glasses, I had a hard time reading the screen after a little while. The only time I have to wear glasses is when I am using a computer or, usually, while reading. I realyl wanted a PDA for eBooks and carrying around documentation in PDF or other formats. I had excellent luck using as iSilo to convert HTML to Palm Doc formats but could never really find a good, really useable, solution for PDFs.

      I would prefer a little larger screen size where I could comfortably read PDFs (without the scrollbars that you have to use when reading PDF docs on a Palm). I don't even think the screens on the PPC devices I've seen are lare enough.

      Graffiti for me was a little slower than the natural handwriting recognition of the Newton, but surpisingly enough, the accuracy was about equal between the two systems.

      Also, if I drop the DayRunner, it won't shatter :) (or dent like my aluminum-clad Clie did).

    7. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by Samus · · Score: 1

      I would avoid them both until Palm OS 6 comes out with the multitasking ability it sorely lacks. Also 6 will be the first code that incorporates things from the Be engineers. At that point I will probably switch back to Palm. For now I seem to alternate between my iPaq and my Zaurus. I like the windows integration of the iPaq better than the Z but I like the interface and keyboard of the Z more than the iPaq.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    8. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by hacker · · Score: 1
      "Of course, my decision was really made for me this time 'round: I use a Mac at home, and Palm is the only company that really supports Mac OS"

      Don't be so sure. Their partners are dropping Mac support like flies. Metrowerks has already dropped their Mac support for their CodeWarrior IDE for PalmOS development, orphaning off the Mac developers. Expect to see more and more of this in the very near future.

      Thankfully, many of them are beginning to see that there IS still support for Linux, Unix, Mac/OSX, and Windows users, through a Free Software project called pilot-link, so they're moving in that direction instead.

      Free, Open, Available, and most-of-all, friendly. Many things Palm and partners are not.

    9. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Don't be so sure.

      I was really talking about current Mac support from a desk-top, integration, usability point of view. Palm and Apple have, for the time being, formed a business relationship to promote each others' tech.

      How long this lasts is always open to interpretation, but is out of our hands anyway. Currently, core funcitionality works Good Enough for me. That is, I can sync to everything I need (on Windows at work, on the Mac at home), and can drag and drop files to the palm via Bluetooth. This is the kind of support I'm talking about.

      As for developer support, Palm seems happy enough to provide documents and links to free prc-tools and emulators for all platforms, including Mac. Took me only a few hours to set up a gcc cross-compiler and prc creation system on OS X. I'd never have considered Code Warrior as a dev platform, but according to Metrowerks, they still sell and support Code Warrior for the Mac. Perhaps if I coded for money for a variety of embedded targets and wanted a one-stop solution, I'd consider Code Warrior.

      Anyway, my point still stands: if you want a handheld that has good Mac OS X support (where "support" is defined as above), you have to buy a new Palm.

      The largest hole in this support is lack of third-party conduits, as these are generally very platform-specific, and tend to be targeted to the most common platform (i.e., Windows). The Mac Plam conduit API still exists and is supported by Palm.

      As far as pilot-link is concerned, I didn't see much in the Docs section that gave anything more than what I already have with a default Palm-iSync-Mac setup.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    10. Re:choose, but choose wisely.... by arth33 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be so bad if Sony was consistent--but of the several Sony PDAs at the local stores, no two use the same form factor for anything more than the memory stick.

      Something Sony has actually done quite well is maintain consistency across the board. All the sony Clie's (as far as I know, the three I've personally used at least) use the same connector. This IMHO is far more important than the rest of the form factor being the same. Keyboards, chargers, cradles, cables, etc. all use the same connector.

      Palm uses the same physical form but changes connectors pretty regularly (or at least they used to), making lots of the expensive accessories obsolete pretty quickly. Screen covers are cheap and can be made yourself.

      Sony accessories used to be harder to find when they were first entering the market, but that's just the way it is when you first enter the market. There are plenty of Clie accessories from Sony and third parties now though.

  9. Neither is dropped... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well, in a way. The current Palms appear to be more advanced then the current Handsprings.

    My guess: Handspring - Phone/Palm Combo

    Palm - Normal PDA

    Handspring / Palm - low cost entry... Not sure which one probably will end up to be Palm.

  10. So what... by esconsult1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Until they have SSH clients and proper wireless access, the point is moot anyway.

    1. Re:So what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called an iPAQ. Say it with me. "EYE. PACK"

    2. Re:So what... by ThogScully · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have TopGun SSH on my Visorphone which would work fine on a Treo at higher speeds (GPRS) if I could afford one. I have been able to remotely administer my servers out of near disasters before. What is your point? -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    3. Re:So what... by NMerriam · · Score: 4, Informative

      Until they have SSH clients and proper wireless access, the point is moot anyway.

      Huh? how many SSH clients do you need?

      It isn't enough that the offer GSM, CDMA, Bluetooth, and 802.11? What other form of wireless are you looking for -- telepathy?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    4. Re:So what... by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 3, Informative

      TGssh doesn't verify the server's public key, so it's not actually secure at all.

    5. Re:So what... by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, my Tungsten C runs 802.11b with pop and smtp and http and vnc (therefore proper wireless access); I haven't tried SSH on it yet.

    6. Re:So what... by Unipuma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps you personally feel that you must be able to use SSH to log into another computer, in which case I can imagine SSH being a requirement (but those options are available)
      To most people though, a PDA is what those letters stand for: A personal data assistant. You write down your appointments and get reminders about them in time, you write down addresses and phonenumbers of people, make notes on the fly, and add some other tools for your personal needs. (Metro planner, Library database, etc)
      A PDA was never meant as a mini-laptop to use on a network, it was meant to rest in your pocket, and allow you to quickly look up the things you needed to know in your every day life.

    7. Re:So what... by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 1

      You'll be wanting to use Mocha Telnet (www.mocha.de), my friend. $10 donation-ware. Works a treat. TG_SSH sucked big time on my Treo 270.

      Only thing is it doesn't send the terminal emulation properly to the server, so you have to manually set your environment variable to vt220 or whatever before things like pine will work...

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    8. Re:So what... by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm crap... www.mochasoft.dk.

      Normal service will resume shortly.

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    9. Re:So what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean by SSH client? A remote shell?

      Tungston C has 802.11b that supports ipsec (http://www.palm.com/wireless/vpn/)
      The new palm browser supports SHTTP.
      (http://www.palm.com/software/webbrowserpr o/)
      Versamail supports SSL.
      (http://www.palm.com/software/versamail25/)

    10. Re:So what... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      TGssh doesn't verify the server's public key, so it's not actually secure at all.

      It's also an SSH1 client, not SSH2. The small screen size is a bit of an annoyance, but it was written for a 160x160 monochrome display. With the 320x320 color Palms that are out now, it should be possible to use subpixel drawing to do 80x40 text that would be reasonably legible (you'd have a 12x8 grid in which to draw each character). I started plotting out a few characters and displayed the results in Paint on a desktop LCD; I think it'd be legible enough. I haven't looked into whether it'd be feasible, but maybe the OpenSSH client (which already supports SSH2) could be combined with a suitable text generator to produce an updated Palm SSH client.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    11. Re:So what... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      PS: Obviously it doesn't come with VNC, but I've had it work on my comp...

  11. iPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd buy an HP iPaq all over again. Simply amazing and easy to program.

  12. Elimination? by thamaht · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A merger doesn't always mean elimination. In many cases there's actual merging.
    I don't see why it has to be one or the other. Palm has been smart, and if they continue to be, the features of the Handspring will be added in to the next Palm Pilot revision.

    1. Re:Elimination? by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to their purchase of the BeOS?

    2. Re:Elimination? by StarFace · · Score: 1

      (See also: Palm OS 5.0)

      --
      V
    3. Re:Elimination? by orev · · Score: 1

      You'll hear about that towards the end of this year, when PalmSource starts talking about Palm OS 6.

  13. Why did Handspring split off in the first place? by smartalix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Doesn't anyone remember that Handspring was a Palm spin-off? Was this all just a bunch of chess moves? Did Handspring ever intend to become a viable player, and if so, why give up now?

    --
    Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  14. This is good for Both - Like Apple by StAugustineLovesYou · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This "is a good thing (tm)" for both companies. The major competition for the PalmOS platform is no longer Handspring, but the explosion of PocketPC based products. By consolidating, Palm will be able to avoid brand dilution, and put up a united front against Microsoft in the handheld market. This is very similar to the move Apple made a few years back to reign in the clones.

    1. Re:This is good for Both - Like Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and Apple's market share has continued to dwindle since then. Go Apple!!! Like Apple, it might be good for Palm's bottom line, but not good for winning back market share. Plus, there's still Sony, which makes some pretty cool Palm based handhelds.

    2. Re:This is good for Both - Like Apple by sconest · · Score: 1
      The major competition for the PalmOS platform is no longer Handspring, but the explosion of PocketPC based products.

      Sony's Clie's are still there

      --
      Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    3. Re:This is good for Both - Like Apple by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      I strongly disagree. Apple's reigning in of the clones nearly killed them (although it was at least as much IBM reneging on their open platform).

      Consolidating tiny Handspring is a drop in the bucket, and as some other poster said, more of a handout to the ex-Palm execs. With Sony and several other PalmOS licensees going strong, taking Handspring out of the mix will have little impact.

      What does Palm get? Some existing licensing into the wireless phone companies. Most of the other Handspring innovations, such as a card slot, are default features these days.

      I'm still waiting for my perfect convergence device: 2.5+Megapixel camera, 3G phone with a decent virtual machine (JVM, CLR, whatever), GPS, GB+ storage, MP3 playback, all of it no bigger than my Palm 500-series, and with battery life that'll work all weekend.

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
  15. Re:Don't get your cocks in an uproar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have the Palma Sutra program. It's definitely a worthy investment. Great way to kick your crotch into high gear. Never tried it with a love doll though.

  16. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by M-2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, it wasn't a Palm spin-off. It was two of the founders of Palm, who got shuffled out after Palm was bought by 3Com, starting their own company.

    I'm going to miss Handspring - I still have and use my Visor Deluxe daily, although the screen's starting to go and it'll have to be replaced soon. I refuse, however, to give in to farting around with those damn thumboards on the Treos. Looks like it may be a Sony for me, or just go PocketPC.

  17. obvious and sad answer by mirko · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what gets dropped

    Half of the staff. :-/

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:obvious and sad answer by mirko · · Score: 1

      Erm... This was *not* supposed to be funny :-(

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  18. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Um... no. Handspring was created by Jeff Hawkins (the designer and creator of the original Pilot/PalmPilot), Donna Dubinsky and Ed Colligan. The Original Three Founders of Palm left that comnpany because 3Com refused to spin off Palm as a separate entity. About a year later, Palm decided to do just that.... Hopefully now, Hawkins will come back into the fold and knock some sense into the gaggle of executives that Palm has acquired over the years...

  19. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by davmct · · Score: 0

    Actually, Handspring wasn't a spin-off, but rather, the original owners of Palm flying the coup after making millions on the sell-out of Palm to 3M (I believe). They then opened up shop down the street with a portion of their sell-out, called it Handspring, and began competing once again.

  20. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1

    Handspring was not a Palm spinoff. I think a bunch of Palm employees decided to go off and start Handspring, but it was not an official split off. There was no relationship between the two other than those early employees.

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
  21. If I were buying a PDA by drdale · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd buy a Zaurus.

    --
    This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    1. Re:If I were buying a PDA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This should really be modded to "informative", as this person's remark isn't insightful to anything other than his/her pocketbook/os alliances/taste. On the other hand, it is informing the public about this choice. If slashdot has a "+1 Oh. That's nice" rating, this'd the a good time to use it.

    2. Re:If I were buying a PDA by uberdood · · Score: 1

      Well, enjoy your Zaurus.

      I picked up one from HSN for $199. It's going on EBay since I received my Tungsten T. I'm SO much happier. More apps focused on PDA usage. Longer running time. Better display (resolution and quality). Easier application syncing. Better form factor. And yeah, I'm a fan of the sliding door PDAs - be it the Zaurus keyboard or the Tungsten T graffiti area.

      The concept of the Zaurus is neat - port your Linux proggie to it. Problem is, Linux isn't about PDA-type apps so much as it is about desktop apps.

      As clevermonkey said above - the Zaurus feels good in the hand, but usability leaves you wanting more.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  22. Returning to the fold? by Malfourmed · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't pretent to know my PDA history but wasn't Handspring founded by the guys who created the Palm Pilot in the first place?

    Doesn't this make the order of things something like:

    1. Guys invent Palm Pilot
    2. US Robotics buy out guys - guys make money
    3. 3Com buys out US Robotics - guys make money
    4. 3Com spins off Palm as separate company - guys make money
    5. Guys leave Palm, undoubtedly with money, start up Handspring
    6. Palm buys Handspring - guys make money
    BTW I'm using the term "guys" generically, I think at least one of the key people was female.
    1. Re:Returning to the fold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I think at least one of the key people was female.

      See the Business Week article on Norma Furtek (sp?). She and Wesley Stoneberg left Palm to start Handspring. As far as I know, they are still with the company.

    2. Re:Returning to the fold? by DivideByZero · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's the most interesting way of spelling Donna Dubinsky and Jeff Hawkins that I've ever seen... Or are you changing the names to protect the innocent, Mr. Webb?

    3. Re:Returning to the fold? by HaloZero · · Score: 1, Funny

      BTW I'm using the term "guys" generically, I think at least one of the key people was female.

      Yeah, isn't she the one that made the PDA comfortable, small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, and offer all the protection you could ever need? (so long as you have spare batteries...)

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    4. Re:Returning to the fold? by mckwant · · Score: 1
      Well, it's not necessarily clear that step 4 was wise. Spinning off Palm looked good for a while, but, IIRC, since the Palm market stagnated, the stock kinda puked up a lung. Check out the five year chart. Not pretty, and it includes a 1:20 reverse stock split in October, 2002.

      Of course, the people who really make all the money in a spinoff or IPO are the bankers, so guys were still making money, just not the ones you thought.

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig.
    5. Re:Returning to the fold? by jedinite · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct...

      Handspring founders Jeff Hawkins--who invented the first Palm handheld--and former CEO Donna Dubinsky established Palm in 1992, and were the top names at Palm until they left in 1998 to start Handspring. Handspring became one the first outside companies to license Palm's operating system.

      Reportadly, Hawkins and Dubinsky will become part of the new management of the combined company and are "expected to help lead the company toward its new goals". With the PalmSource software operation running on its own, Palm--now a hardware company--will focus on bolstering its brand and its market share in the handheld market.

      --

      ---------
      There is no try at jedinite.com
    6. Re:Returning to the fold? by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

      Hawkins and Dubinsky will become part of the new management of the combined company and are "expected to help lead the company toward its new goals".

      Isn't the reason they QUIT Palm in the first place because they had such a hard time dealing with the rest of the management?

      Honestly, though - This will probably be a Good Thing for Palm - They just can't seem to get their act together, IMO. Most of what they're selling nowadays only looks good in comparison to Sony's trash.

    7. Re:Returning to the fold? by LeiGong · · Score: 1

      For the most part you chronology is correct but you have one small fact wrong. #4 and #5 should be switched. The reason why the founders left Palm was because 3Com said Palm would never be spun off from 3Com. This meant the founders would have a lot less control over their creation. An internal struggle for control ensued and a result the founders left 3Com. Interestingly enough, 3Com renegged on their promise and spun off 3Com only a few month after the founders left. Now the two guys are joining their old company after years of separation. How's that for irony?

  23. CEO goes home? by sparkes · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If I remember correctly the female CEO of handspring was one of key developers of the Palm OS. She left to start handspring who became the first licensees of the Palm OS.

    So I guess the people involved in Handspring from Palm go back to their old jobs.

    Palm and Handspring both win, unfortunatly we are the only possible (l)users. Handspring pushed palm and now they are gone Palm is alone in this segment of the market.

    Stuff below Palm and Handspring machines (in terms of cost) are toys, the stuff above them are too expensive. As the better machines get cheaper do palm try to keep the middle ground or do they becomes toys?

    Imagine a Zaurus for the price of a lowend Palm OS machine, no don't imagine purchase it in a couple of years.

    Sorry Palm buying out your sister is not going to be enough to keep the sector you made your own.

    1. Re:CEO goes home? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      handspring hasn't been doing much the past few years to compete with Palm -- Sony has been pushing the consumer PDA side (and continues to). handspring was focusing on communicators, and thats something Palm is just now getting into, so it made sense to rejoin the groups that had gone separate ways.

      Am i the only one baffled at the amazingly Pro-MS sentiment on Slashdot when it comes to handhelds?

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:CEO goes home? by jht · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Donna Dubinsky wasn't a developer - she was the "Professional Manager" that was brought in to run Palm during the early startup days. She, along with Jeff Hawkins (the fellow who essentially invented the Palm computer) and Ed Colligan (an early Palm marketing head) were the three core people who left to found Handspring. They took a few other engineers with them when they left.

      In the last year or so, Handspring stopped building standalone organizers (the core Palm hardware business) and bet the company on wireless communicators using the Palm OS, to mixed results (popular acceptance, critical praise, but losing money because the adoption rate wasn't fast enough). With Handspring, Palm gets some new expertise in building phone/PDA devices that they lacked (despite the i705 and Tungsten W, this wasn't a Palm strength), to complement their existing lines of organizers/networked wireless devices. Now they can compete in all three categories directly - standalone organizers, Bluetooth/WiFi organizers, and cellphone/2.5g/3g organizers.

      What products are dead out of this? I'd guess all the existing standalone devices from Handspring die, but they're already on the way out now anyway. At some point, the Handspring brand replaces the Zire brand for the low end. And the Handsprig Treos push out the Tungsten W, while the i705 dies a quiet death.

      I'll stick with my existing 3 devices - a Tungsten T (the everyday pocket device for me), my Zaurus 5500 (when I want wireless or I don't have the space to transport a real computer), and for sentimental value my Newton Messagepad 2100. I don't think anything will come out of this merger for at least a year or two that would compel me to swap out any of the handhelds I own.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    3. Re:CEO goes home? by dmccarty · · Score: 1
      If I remember correctly the female CEO of handspring was one of key developers of the Palm OS.

      Somebody please mod the parent down, it's full of inaccuracies. Donna Dubinsky was the business manager of Palm Computing before they were sold to U.S. Robotics. Jeff Hawkins was the key developer of the Palm and the Palm OS. For more info see this page at Handspring.

      --
      Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
    4. Re:CEO goes home? by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 1

      Imagine a Zaurus for the price of a lowend Palm OS machine, no don't imagine purchase it in a couple of years

      Admittadly I can't spell ;), nor do I know the cost of a lower end palm. That aside, I just bought a Zaurus (SL-5500) for $200. It is recertified, but in very good shape. plus I paid $23 for an extra year's warranty. It's been trating me great. Is that a competitive price?

      --
      This space for rent, inquire within.
    5. Re:CEO goes home? by stripes · · Score: 1
      Jeff Hawkins (the fellow who essentially invented the Palm computer)

      Hmmmmm. He seems to be the person who had the key insight to remove lots of features that were too expensive for what they could do in a palmtop computer in the mid-90s. Go, MagicCap, Zoom, and a dozen others were trying to do fancy learning handwriting recognition and failing because they didn't have enough CPU. Jeff made Grafitti and sold it on some other Palm sized computers (in fact a lot of software on my very old palmtop I bought on closeout form Price Club was from "Palm Software" (incl. Graffiti), but it predated the Palm Pilot by years)

      I don't think he really invented it...he just slashed out features until the hardware could keep up. He had a similar approach at Handspring. I think it didn't work out so well because the expansion port that that phliophosphy created couldn't survive a transition from the CPU32 to the ARM (or pretty much any other CPU). Bad call when he already knew Palm was replaying the Macintosh history :-)

    6. Re:CEO goes home? by jht · · Score: 1

      Bingo. It's not that he invented palm computers, it's that he invented the Palm computer. And his major contribution (besides Grafitti, which I still use on my Newton) was the realization that what people needed was a small, simple, relatively inexpensive device that could simply keep track of the essentials and perform quickly. That led Palm to produce a device that was far less capable than it's competition, but better at what it did do. And it functioned as an extension of your desktop rather than as "yet another gadget". Hawkins was already in a good position to observer the failures that had come before, but he still had to figure out what people might actually buy.

      Newton, wonderful as it was (and still is), was too big and too expensive for most people, and though the HWR was actually pretty good people didn't have the patience to go through the learning curve. Zoomer was simply a "me too" counterpart, and the MagicCap devices (the Sony is the one I remember best) were basically Newton-sized devices with pretty animation and a goofy cartoon interface - almost like MS Bob for portable devices.

      Palm was the first company that Got It as far as what consumers would actually want, which is how they've been able to dominate the class for so long. PDA's did turn out to be huge, just like John Sculley said they would be - just ten years later than he hoped.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  24. Springboard by Lxy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pissed that the springboard slot has been discontinued from Handspring models. I bought mine specifically because of the slot, and I've got several attachments for it. It's by far the most economical way to upgrade a PDA, and they scrapped it. My hope would be that Palm returns the Handspring slot, but I kind of doubt they will.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:Springboard by donweel · · Score: 1

      The springboard was also my main reason for buying the handspring, but also the cool colour choice. Howerver in Vancouver BC there was only the mp3 player available, I was hoping for a compatable visorphone, but there was none for Canada. Mabey now is the time to get a good price an upgrade model before they are discontinued.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    2. Re:Springboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But now there's Compaq Flash, SD and XD memory and expansion slots. CF seems to be the industry standard since Handspring kept their springboard slot all to themselves.

      Rather unfortunate, but I see it all the time.

  25. Can see the headlines now... by SysPig · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Palm Springs For Sale"

    There's a way to freak out about a gazillion old folks...

  26. Forget all the above by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

    I've had a unit from Palm, Handspring, and a Windows device from Toshiba. I hated them all. They crashed too much and only held static information (since the wireless plans are so expensive only God and Bill Gates can arrord them),,,, not to mention how horsey big the units get when you put wireless equipment on them.

    I now carry a T-Mobile Sidekick. It replaced all the above AND my cell phone. Maximum PC did a head-to-head shootout this month and the Sidekick kicked ALL their butts. Bad.

    Plus, the cell/data plans include *unlimited* data. Unlimited! All for $39.95 a month.

    1. Re:Forget all the above by xyzzy · · Score: 1

      I agree that the Sidekick is a hot contender, but (as I'm sure you know) it is missing at least one vital feature: local synch. There is no easy way to get data in and out, and you have to trust THEIR servers with your data (ick!).

      Also, in reading hiptop.com, I've been rather appalled at their infant mortality rate. I don't know why their hardware has been so flakey, but they really need to step up quality control.

      I think if they can lick the hardware issues and actually move out on feature development, they could own the space.

    2. Re:Forget all the above by RicoX9 · · Score: 1

      I bought a Sidekick in October 2002. I quit using it by January '03. Reasons: 1 - As the prior poster said, getting data in and out is a complete bitch. 2 - The battery life approached ZERO in one hell of a hurry. This is not a user replaceable option(AFAIK). Send back to T-Mobile for replacement, re-enter all of your contact info BY HAND. 3 - Good F'ing luck getting T-mobile to setup your account properly. I NEVER could select a sidekick as my phone to import contacts through the website. One month after buying the $39.95 plan, the system had me back on the $49.95 (Powertel) plan I had had for years. 4 - I haven't looked recently, but accessories for the Sidekick were few and expensive. Granted it was brand new, so things are probably better now. 5 - Lastly, data access is spotty. It goes out frequently, and for days at a time. You'd better live/work/use the sidekick in an area that has great coverage, as signal strength really affects your data throughput. Anywhere I would sit down to use it seemed to have a marginal signal (YMMV).

    3. Re:Forget all the above by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      1) Why would you have a problem with their servers storing your data? That's a **plus**! Unlike Palm, Handsprint, and PocketPC that have to be backed up religiously, T-Mobile backs up all your data automatically! I've had the device since day #1 and never lost 1 byte!

      2) Some people have had back luck with the units. Keep in mind that satisfied people don't rant and rave. ;-) I've had the **same unit** since day #1 and have never had a problem. Never. Not one.

    4. Re:Forget all the above by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      1) Getting data in is a bitch? I take it you didn't find the upload capabilities through your web desktop? ;-) Once the data is up loaded, you can either edit it on the device or through the web interface.

      2) I have no problems with the battery life. None. Also, why in the hell you had to enter all your data again is beyond me! The T-Mobile servers backup your device constantly. I've even reset mine and **every byte** of your data comes back the second the device is powered back on. Try THAT with a Palm or PocketPC!

      3) I have no idea what your local T-Mobile Rep's problem is. Mine was setup right day #1 without issue.

      4) What accessories did you want for the Sidekick? It's a pretty complete unit.

      5) I think GMS/GPRS coverage is **terrific**!! I'm rarely off the data network.

    5. Re:Forget all the above by xyzzy · · Score: 1

      1) I would prefer not to store my private data on the servers of a nameless, faceless behemoth of a phone company, especially since that's my ONLY alternative (not only do I have to *trust* them with the data, I have to trust them to keep it safe!)

      Keep in mind that "backing up" in the Palm world is simply the normal hotsync operation, which I usually do 1x/day anyway. I can throw my palm under the wheels of a bus, go buy a new one, synch it, and I'm back where I started.

      2) Yea, I do realize that it's only the really dissatisfied people who post on hiptop.com :-) It does seem like the hardware issues are more than what I'd expect, even in a new system, and more to the point, T-Mobile doesn't really have a good procedure to deal with them. But this will certainly improve over time, no doubt.

    6. Re:Forget all the above by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Another point to consider is that to do a backup on your Palm unit, you have to run back to a particular PC to do it.

      On the other hand, as soon as I enter data into my Sidekick, it's backed up. Plain and simple. I could be on a "road trip" or vacation and not sweat losing information.

    7. Re:Forget all the above by beddess · · Score: 1

      the 7135 can do wireless sync.

      --
      "Weasling out of work is important to learn; it is what separates humans from animals. Except for weasels."
    8. Re:Forget all the above by stripes · · Score: 1
      Another point to consider is that to do a backup on your Palm unit, you have to run back to a particular PC to do it.

      I know some Palm's can back up over TCP/IP...

    9. Re:Forget all the above by RicoX9 · · Score: 1

      1) Getting data in is a bitch if T-Mobile can't get your account setup right. Read the post. I could never select my phone as the SideKick, therefore I could never access the web interface for my SideKick.

      2) *You* didn't have battery problems, but *I* DID. As I'm sure a LOT of others do. These things are plagued with problems. *I* would have to manually re-enter my data if I sent it in for replacement because I have no way to sync it with the website. That may not be the case, it may sync fine even though I don't have access to that portion of the T-Mobile website.

      3) Most of the T-Mobile reps didn't even know what it was when I got it. I was told it could take a week to activate it, but they activated it for me that day anyway.

      4) Better carrying case (stock one sucks IMO) for one. Maybe some better ear peices. I don't know, I was just used to having lotsa options for phones. (no biggie)

      5) You are one of the lucky ones then. Data service routinely went out for 48+ hrs at a time for me, even though I could make phone calls no problem.

  27. Why not divide and conquer? by neglige · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Palm can provide the upper-class business models (read: expensive, primarily PIM functions, long battery life, sleek design) and sell low-cost models under the Handspring brand (e.g. for students, young adults etc.).

    Maybe even Handspring products will focus on multimedia capabilites, personally I think Palm never really quite managed to score in that area.

    But then again, things could remain the way they are :)

    --
    My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    1. Re:Why not divide and conquer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the zire 71 and the tungsten series.
      I can easily playback a movie(with great quality). Listening to mp3's is no problem(thanks to apps like realone) either .
      A perfect stereo sound if you use headphones, the speaker onboard is even an extra, heck I can even play nes, game gear and gameboy games on it.
      Did I mention the zire 71 can take medium-sized photographs too?

  28. If I had to buy a PDA right now... by metamatic · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I'd probably get a Sony CLIE, because they have the biggest screen.

    As it is, I see no reason to upgrade from my old Palm V. Which, I think, is the problem--Palm really hasn't come up with anything compelling.

    However, perhaps BIGGER SCREEN the merged company might BIGGER SCREEN be able BIGGER SCREEN to work out BIGGER SCREEN something that BIGGER SCREEN would encourage people BIGGER SCREEN to upgrade?

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, I have a Sony PEG-SJ20, and they're actually *smaller* than most PDAs. The trick is that they have a much higher resolution and a very broad grayscale pallette. Combined with their white backlight technology (anyone else HATE the HandSpring backlight?), the screen is extremely easy to read and images have a very high fidelity. The only thing I wish they'd solve is the glare off the screen. In direct lighting situations (i.e. a lamp over your shoulder), it can make the screen harder to read.

      Oh, and just in case you are referring to the resolution of the Sony, the newest Palm devices use 320x320 as well.

    2. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by orev · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a bigger screen would be nice. There's always hope that there will be a new unit with virtual graffiti, but don't hold your breath.

      As far as a compelling reason to upgrade, the Tungsten T really is a huge leap. I just upgraded from a m515 to the TT, and I'm very happy. Going from a PalmV to a TT would knock your socks off! :)

    3. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by graikor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A bigger screen is a mixed blessing - on the one hand you can view more information, or run at a larger font size without only being able to read a dozen words on the screen, but on the other hand, it could make the PDA too bulky to fit in a pocket.

      I find my Clie's screen (320x320) to be pretty close to a perfect compromise, but I admit I'm used to very small text sizes.

    4. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by jargoone · · Score: 1

      The only thing I wish they'd solve is the glare off the screen.

      Buy some of those Fellowes Write Right stick-on screen protectors. In addition to protecting the screen and giving you a nice textured surface to write on, they cut the glare down quite a bit.

    5. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by metamatic · · Score: 1

      Ah, I think you've misunderstood. I don't want a higher resolution screen, I want a bigger screen.

      I want something about the size of a paperback book, so I can comfortably read books on it. I don't care if it fits in a pocket or not, because I never carry my Palm in a pocket anyway. The only thing that goes in my pocket is my phone.

      Trying to sell me a PDA that's pocket sized and has calendar, to-do list and address book isn't good enough. My phone is smaller than a PDA and does all those things, plus it's a phone. So for Palm (or Sony) to sell me something, it has to be able to do more--say, browse the web, read books, write e-mail, take notes in meetings, and so on--which means it needs a bigger screen.

      (Oh, and it has to not run Windows. I've never bought or stolen any Microsoft software and I'm not about to start.)

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    6. Re:If I had to buy a PDA right now... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      No, I think you misunderstood me. You said:

      > ...I'd probably get a Sony CLIE, because they have
      > the biggest screen.

      And I responded that I own one and they are much smaller than most Palms. The largest screen I'm aware of is the HandSpring Visor. I got one for my wife and the things are HUGE. I added the qualifier about the resolution just in case I did misunderstand you.

      > I want something about the size of a paperback
      > book, so I can comfortably read books on it.

      Actually, if you read my other post on this topic, I stated that I use my SJ20 primarily for reading. I liked using my SJ20 so much, that I've close to sworn off paper books. The Sony CLIEs are especially nice for reading because they fit in your palm well (the one that's part of your hand), you can change pages with a slight movement (thanks to the scroll wheel), and the high resolution means that the words are easy to read whether you choose a small font or a large font. (I have eye-strain, so I usually use a large font. Much easier for me to read. The small font is very nice for most readers tho.)

      My primary reader is MobiPocket, and I get a lot of books from Baen. Go read "On Basilisk Station" and "Mutineer's Moon" from their free library. If you like them, buy the "War of Honor" book with the CD of the entire series, and purchase the collected Dahak series (Mutineer's Moon and two others) for 5 dollars from their WebScription service. The collection is called "Empire from the Ashes".

  29. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by c.derby · · Score: 1

    It wasn't neccessarily a spin-off. Handspring was formed by the guy that created Palm. He (and some other Palm employess) left to start their own company after 3com acquired Palm because "they missed the thrill of being part of a new venture, and for the autonomy that running their own company gives them".

    --
    -- derby
  30. Sitting on innovation by eoinatstraylight · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a harsh reality, but with the patents palm aquired with buying handspring, they may just sit on them to ensure no competitors get to use them.

    It's happened before, remember SyQuest? They made removable storage similar to the zip and Jaz drives, only theirs were virtually indestructable, and based on tried and tested winchester technology.

    When SyQuest finally went titsup.com, its only competitor iOmega bought the patents, and they havn't seen the light of day since.

    I'd hate to see another technically superior product get betamaxed by a large company.

    1. Re:Sitting on innovation by HeyYou82 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Syquest drives were "virtually indestructable"? Where do you get this information? I *HAD* a SyQuest drive a few years back, the thing died after roughly a year's usage, and by that time, the company was gone. I now have 3 disks that have stuff on them I cannot get off, save for buying a used drive off of eBay.

      --
      - HeyYou
    2. Re:Sitting on innovation by jht · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indestructible? You must be thinking of some other company named SyQuest - because all the SyQuest drives I ever saw sucked big-time. Using Winchester technology in a cartridge with unreliable sealing technology was a recipe for disaster on a regular basis. Iomega Jaz drives were a little better, but not that much - their advantage was size and speed compared to SyQuest. Zip drive media was pretty good, though - it was the drives that were cheaply made and relatively unreliable.

      The most reliable drives I ever remember seeing were the old Iomega Bernoulli drives. I used to have two of the 90 meg drives that I used to move files between home and work. So I usually had a couple of cartridges in my briefcase. One time, in a pinch I had to use a Bernoulli cartridge as an ice scraper on my car's windshield.

      The cartridge did the job effectively. And I continued to use it for data afterwards.

      Handspring doesn't bring much to the table compared to Palm in the patent area, I think. I suspect the purchase is more based on getting a complementary product line (the Treos), a low-end brand name less goofy than Zire, and a bunch of skilled hardware engineers.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    3. Re:Sitting on innovation by Samus · · Score: 1

      SyQuest was far from indestructable. A place I worked at had about 30 of them that all bit the big one due to the click death syndrome. It seems that SyQuest drives had the same problem as zip drives did. BTW the place absolutely needed the data off of the discs so they sent them to one of those places that recover data from crashed hard drives. They were able to get most of the data off the discs but it cost them in the thousands.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    4. Re:Sitting on innovation by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      It's happened before, remember SyQuest? They made removable storage similar to the zip and Jaz drives, only theirs were virtually indestructable

      I know some people have reported problems with Zip drives (though mine have never given me any trouble), but have you never heard of the EZ135? IIRC, those caused far more problems than Zip drives ever did. Look at 'em funny and they were toast.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    5. Re:Sitting on innovation by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      The most reliable drives I ever remember seeing were the old Iomega Bernoulli drives. I used to have two of the 90 meg drives that I used to move files between home and work. So I usually had a couple of cartridges in my briefcase. One time, in a pinch I had to use a Bernoulli cartridge as an ice scraper on my car's windshield.

      Years ago, an Iomega rep came to town to demo a Bernoulli drive. During the demo, he popped the disk with his presentation out of the drive and literally threw it out into the audience. It got dropped on the floor, bounced off the wall, etc. for a minute or two. Eventually, the disk got sent back to the front of the room. It was put back in the drive and the presentation continued where it was left off. That is durability.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    6. Re:Sitting on innovation by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > remember SyQuest?

      Do I ever.

      Wayyyy back in the day, I was looking for a new removable media solution because, even back then, a 1.44MB floppy was just too damn small to be useful anymore. Iomega's Zip drive and the Syquest EZ 135 cartridge were both pretty new to the market. Neither one had REALLY caught on yet, so there was no question as to which would be compatible with my friends.

      Both drives were about the same price. And since neither had achieved dominence, I based my decision on their technical merits. I went with the EZ 135 because for the same price:

      The Syquest had 35MB more space per cartridge.

      It was MUCH faster than the Zip drive (fast enough to use as a real hard drive... I used to play Mechwarrior and run OSs off the thing.)

      When I eventually changed its position on my IDE bus, it was BOOTABLE. And, in those days, both Linux and windows (95) had a small enough installation footprint to fit in 135MB. Thus, I could dual-boot without futzing around with LILO. And I could let friends, roommates, and family use the machine without having to explain partitions and Linux to them whenever windows crashed. (I had to change the drive's position on the IDE cable, because this was back in the days before gates had figured out how to make a peecee boot from anything other than a: or c:)

      The cartridges were more durable than Zip disks.

      And the drive was more reliable than a Zip (click of doom, anyone?)

      I thought I had made an excellent choice. Imagine my dismay when Syquest totally failed to market themselves, and Iomega's slick campaigns won the world over. I mean... fuck... if everyone was going to settle for slow and unreliable media, and REALLY wanted 100MB disks, they should AT LEAST have chosen Sony's "Superdisk" drives, which kept the familiar 3.5" form factor and were backwards-compatible with 1.44MB floppys! But no... Zip it was. Ugh.

      Iomega is a FINE example of just about the WORST products in the market segment beating out the others not through superior technology, but with slicker marketing.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    7. Re:Sitting on innovation by platypus · · Score: 1

      IMO that repeated a bit later with magneto optical drives. They had cd-rom like capacity (640 MB, maybe there were smaller ones at the beginning, eventually they got alot bigger later), are super reliable (they are expected to be durable for 50+ years, I read sometime about it in sc.american), and not too slow.

      What happend? Everybody waited for cd-writers to come out and iomega happily sold their shitty undersized drives to the rest.

      IMO the failure of MOs is the reason that we don't have a reliable backup medium (short of super expensive streamers ) today and people will again be very suprised in 5+ years from now that their cd-r backups are busted. Sigh, at least it's better than floppies, which died after 1 year.

      If I imagine what could have become out of MOs if they were developed with the same intensity like CD-Rs, I still get angry.

    8. Re:Sitting on innovation by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You obviously have never seen a SyQuest drive with a faulty retention mechanism spin up that 5" diameter silicon plate, and then have it wiggle its way out of the slot and whang around the room a lot of times.

      SyQuest was poop. If they'd ever actually delivered on their Orb drive (like, as in, made a product, that people could exchange for money, instead of writing press releases, which aren't even very good for toilet paper) before Jaz got situated they'd have been good.

      And if those pigfuckers at Iomega had not been STUPID about their licensing, we could have replaced all these fucking useless 3.5" disk drives with a removable medium that is a) usefully sized and b) not obscenely expensive.

      I was so happy to get a CD burner and finally got to stick my zip drive, and my Bernoulli 230, in the Computer Junk Box of Infinite Power. Both were way too expensive for what they did.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Sitting on innovation by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, "broke" two drives and three cartridges over the course of three years.

      The carts lived on a shelf. The drive sat next to my computer. Every so often, one or the other would just decide that it didn't want to work anymore.

      Anybody want a Bernoulli 230? Two carts. They might even work. Make me an offer.

      Oh yeah, and it will include a $50 SCSI cable. Just 'cuz I'm feeling generous.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Sitting on innovation by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What size disks?

      I'll make you a better deal than eBay for an 88mb SyQuest drive.

      Seriously. Email me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  31. Power Computing = Handspring by adzoox · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Very good point ... Analysts never saw Apple's decision that way though. BUT Power Computing could EASILY be compared to HandSpring. Former Apple employees started it and they also started innovate (PS ports/slightly overclocked processors/IDE optical drives)

    The only difference here is that Handspring is DEAD. I see this more as a nice gesture to Hawkins than anything else. I think Palm wants him back. Palm is starting to get the dillution you speak of from Sony. Clie sales have been on the rise for 6 months straight and should rise even more as prices go down and features go up. Right now The NZ90 is the single most useful all in one device with GREAT integration that I have EVER seen.

    The iPaq has also made a huge dent in sales of Palms. Handspring hasn't been a player for more than a year.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  32. Alternative Handhelds? by randomErr · · Score: 1

    Are there any other handheld other then Palm and Handspring out there? I see $30 one all the time at the local KMart but are they worth it? Why the big difference in price? Wasn't there a handheld being made by a toy company?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    1. Re:Alternative Handhelds? by prozac79 · · Score: 1
      I see $30 one all the time at the local KMart but are they worth it? Why the big difference in price?

      For $30 dollars you do get a non-upgradable PIM. You get a calendar and an address book and that's about it (maybe a game or two as well?). You cannot install any new applications. Of course, right now my once-mighty Palm Vx has taken a place in my backpack and only used as an expensive address book anyway. So yeah, spend the $30 since most PDA functionality goes unused by the common person anyway. Before you spend $300+ on a PDA, use the cheap one to see if you would even integrate a PDA into your normal routine.

      --
      "Oh dear, she's stuck in an infinite loop and he's an idiot" -Prof. Farnsworth (Futurama)
  33. I'd buy a Sony by jonabbey · · Score: 1

    Sony has been consistently pushing new features and lower prices into the PalmOS realm. I bought an SJ-30 a year ago, with 320x320 resolution at 65k colors, 16 megs, memory stick.. all for $250, at a time when Palm and Handspring were selling models with only 160x160 resolution and less memory.

    Find a Sony Clié at your price-point, add LauncherX, and go to town.

    1. Re:I'd buy a Sony by seanmeister · · Score: 1

      I bought a Clie SJ120 last weekend - was shopping the low-end, looked at a Palm Zire for $100. Dog slow, 2MB of memory and no backlight(?!) Found the Clie a couple of steps away, with an super-bright backlight, faster performance, and 16MB of memory for only $30 more than the Zire. Loving it!

  34. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by delorean · · Score: 1
    3Com sold Palm, not bought. 3Com started the Palm and spun it off....

    --
    "You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas"
    Sen. Davy Crocket to US Congress, Nov. 1, 1835
  35. So what gets dropped? by goofrider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nothing really. Handspring decided to end production of the Visor last year IIRC. The Treo line (smartphones) is what Handspring has been focusing on.

    The only overlapping products from these two companies are the Treo 90 (the only non-smartphone PDA in Handspring current product line) and the Tungsten W (the only smartphone from Palm Inc). Both of them are OS 4.1 devices and should reach EOL by the time the merger completes.

  36. As a longtime PalmOS user... by Carpathius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a longtime PalmOS user and a PalmOS developer, I think this is probably a good thing. Palm was just beginning to start producing devices that were for the same market as the new Handspring devices.

    Handspring was no longer for me -- they are focusing on devices with wireless connectivity and thumbboards. But it's a style some people like. This gives Palm a wide variety of handhelds, probably a wider variety than anyone else.

    This will also pretty much make the competition for PalmOS devices Palm and Sony. I'm not sure that's a good thing, but it might not be too bad. Sony is concentrating on PalmOS with multimedia extensions, Palm is concentrating on PalmOS in small, extremely functional devices. There's a lot to be said for both.

    My last buy was a Sony NX70. After seeing and using the big screen, it was hard to go to anything else. Still, I can certainly see the alure of the very small TungstenT...

    Sean.

  37. a bit of history... by ptorrone · · Score: 2, Informative



    mystery investor loans palm $50 million:
    http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=27 29

    sony invests $20 million in palmsource:
    http://www.brighthand.com/article/Sony_Invests_in_ PalmSource

    now, palm is going to buy handspring for $169 million:
    http://www.treocentral.com/content/Stories/230-1.h tm

    wild.

    another fun fact, more people own sony aibo robot dogs than handspring treos.

    cheers,
    pt

  38. Re:Springboard... a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Going proprietary is ALWAYS a bad idea for consumer relations. If the Springboard slot had been a compact flash slot you would STILL be able to use that slot. It's a lesson that Apple has learned somewhat, but that Sony is still hardheaded about.

  39. Re:palm == ugly by ClippyHater · · Score: 1, Funny

    But then again, I have a Neo in my pocket!

    Thank God! I thought you were just happy to see me!

  40. Palm Wants Phones! by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Palm certainly doesn't want Handspring for their Visor line. There isn't much value to that. I don't believe there is anything on the Handspring Visor line has that Palm doesn't already have or couldn't add on their own.

    In fact, Handspring announced in January 2002 that they would discontinue the Visor line when they were coming out with their Treo Communicator (cell phone) line. My guess is that Palm wants to get into the cell phone business. What else does Handspring have to offer? Would you want a Palm branded reconditioned Handspring Visor?

    --
    --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
  41. Re:prices? by Crash42 · · Score: 0

    Yes, they are cheaper. But then again, you can't flash te OS on a Visor. So it comes with a price...

    --


    ....Excuse me, but ... ah, forget it...
  42. Lemme see if I get this. by brennanw · · Score: 1

    The folks who started Handspring were the ones who invented the Palm Pilot. Then they went off to invent the Handspring. Then they got bought out by the company that sells the original thing they invented.

    If this were a study in genetics, their next product would be born with webbed feet and flippers.

    --
    Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
    1. Re:Lemme see if I get this. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2, Funny

      If this were a study in genetics, their next product would be born with webbed feet and flippers.

      Creating the perfect PDA for busy SCUBA divers!
      I wonder if you can get GSM service at 100 meters...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  43. Lots of corporate Palm devices out there... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1

    The price of the Handspring and Palm PDAs (especially on Ebay) makes these devices a good idea for corporations. For company use the lack of features is arguably a plus. No waste of time downloading MP3s or games. The battery life is wonderful (I can get a week out of my Edge and then I simply recharge it), the form factor is outstanding (the Edge is very slender). There is clearly a large market for these devices just in replacements (I've broken one Visor and lost one Edge).

    So if there is a market but not enough of a market to justify two companies competing in it, and it looks like that to me, then this merger makes plenty of sense. There will be some elimination of products but they need to focus on the low-cost, easy-to-use, long-life corporate niche they've dominated for years.

    And Palm devices are easy to synch with both Windows and Linux (I use it with Evolution) desktops. I just hope they keep a product that will be low in cost and slender.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  44. This wont be a popular thing to say but.... by Hyperiongate · · Score: 1

    It is clear that the real inovation in the PDA market rests not with Palm or Handspring but with the Pocket PC. Palm needs to do this to survive.

    1. Re:This wont be a popular thing to say but.... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      For me Pocket PC is totally off the map because I can't use it in conjunction with platforms other than Windows.

    2. Re:This wont be a popular thing to say but.... by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      I was thinking a similiar thing 'till I read some of the information on handhelds.org, and between wanting to have either a nic or wireless nic on my handheld eitherway, its not that much of a pain to setup one of the small ftp servers on it.

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    3. Re:This wont be a popular thing to say but.... by Erwos · · Score: 1
      This is not really true anymore - check out:

      SynCE

      It's not quite done yet, and it'll never let you use Windows installers for programs, but it does help with synchronization, especially with Evolution using MultiSync.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    4. Re:This wont be a popular thing to say but.... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      Ironically, Documents to Go for Palm OS provides better compatibility with MS Office than Pocket Office from MS. That's why I chose the Tungsten T.

  45. Handspring PDAs by sys4some · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago I was looking around for a PDA and found out that Handspring had actually decided to completely stop selling them and focus on phones instead. Don't know why but so the story goes.

  46. The focus of this article... by drgroove · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... is completely wrong.

    "Any merger spells elimination of product lines."

    I'm sorry, but who gives a shit? There is a glut in the handheld market right now - the reduction of products represented in both the Palm and Handspring product lines is beside the point.

    The real question is - How many tech workers are going to be losing their jobs as a result of this merger?

    According the article on ZDNet, Palm will lay off 125 people - not a huge amount, but after the killing spree that merged tech companies have wielded against their workforce, thats 125 too many.

    There are always alternatives to taking jobs away from hard-working people. Why can't management take a pay cut instead? Or, if management is too greedy to indulge in self-sacrifice, perhaps allow everyone the option to take a 5% or 10% reduction in their pay - if they know there will be pink slips in Friday's check if they don't, I can't imagine people not doing it.

    The tech industry as a whole has its priorities in the wrong place - the quote I posted from this /. article spells that out. Can't we get some kind of co-ordinated outcry from the rest of the tech sector about these kind of layoffs? Why don't we boycott Palm and PalmOS products, until Palm/Handspring management get their heads out of their asses and think about the employees that have been keeping their companies afloat, instead of their own pocket books.

    I say, F*** Palm and PalmOS, until they rescind their decision to lay off 125 workers. Anyone else out there have some backbone? Lets show some solidarity here. Who's with me?

    1. Re:The focus of this article... by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

      so, should theyjust keep their 125 workers around to twiddle their thumbs and do nothing? Usually when companies lay people off, it is simply because they have no work for them to do. It would be idiotic to hold onto workers if you are only going to have them sit around and do nothing. Sure, it sucks for the 125 workers, but that's life....

      --
      -Cnik
    2. Re:The focus of this article... by theflea · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, my dad worked for HP. I seem to remember (late 70's?) him and everyone else taking a 10% pay cut for a certain amount of time to avoid layoffs.

      I think that was a different HP and a different era, but why should that be? Sure layoffs do happen, but there doesen't seem to be a shred of decency at the top of most businesses these days.

      I really beleive the middle class is an endangered species.

    3. Re:The focus of this article... by VT_hawkeye · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes. Then the newly merged company can have those 125 useless workers drive up development costs and thus drive up the cost of the product in the marketplace, causing Palm/HS to lose even more market share to Sony and the WinCE brigade. That, in turn, will eventually force an even larger layoff or run the company into the ground. That way they can hurt EVERYONE at Palm and HS, instead of just the 125 at present.

      Mod above comment -1: Shortsighted.

    4. Re:The focus of this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sure layoffs do happen, but there doesen't seem to be a shred of decency at the top of most businesses these days.

      Ah, but why should businesses be loyal to employees if there is no guarantee that the employees will be loyal to the company?

      Or would you try to tell me, straight face and all, that you would decline a new job with a new company and a 15% increase in pay?

    5. Re:The focus of this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of rubbish!

    6. Re:The focus of this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Businesses should be loyal to their employees because they are the ones that support the company. It wouldn't be a company without employees.

      Ultimately, loyalty is earned. If I worked for a company that cared about its employees and provided a challenging and nurturing work environment I would be extremely hesitant to leave...regardless of the extra pay. Money is not the only measure of a job or of success. Isn't it better that you enjoy your job and your work environment? Personally, I'd choose environment and work over the pay I receive.

    7. Re:The focus of this article... by Ramze · · Score: 1
      Getting rid of unnecessary workers is a high priority in most businesses.

      A friend of mine was once told that illiminating 1 job position on an assembly line at his company would save the company about $80,000 a year when the person's salary, benefits, training, and management overhead from supervising were totalled. If I were to use those same numbers (which granted are arbitrary -- and it's likely more savings for a skilled worker) then 125*80,000 would be over a $10 Million savings for the combined company per year.

      Companies are in business to make a profit, which sometimes means getting rid of unnecessary job positions. You don't know if those workers are upper management, janitors, or human resource personel. It's likely that the workers will get a nice severance package and find a job elsewhere where they are needed. (even if it is flipping burgers temporarily until they either find a new job where their skills are needed or learn new skills that are in demand)

      I was a worker at a mortgage company when it was baught out by another in a merger... sure some people were laid off, but they got a severance package equal to about 6 months pay plus their company benefits were extended through 6 months after they left & many that left went to work at better jobs just down the street.

      Not all layoffs are bad for workers (I know people that jumped at the chance to leave w/ a severance package). Layoffs are a part of business. To say that there is always another way is true, but few would chose the alternatives. Say you have two companies that merge. They each have a human resource department, accounting, and IT department. It's likely that most of the HR department from one or the other would have to go. Also, the upper management in charge of each department would have to be rearranged to where some vice presidents or assistant vice presidents would become unnecessary & be given the old golden parachute.

      As for your other options, I don't want to give the systems administrator of one company a job sweeping the hallway because I gave the other systems administrator full control of both companies' network resources. I would rather roll the dice of being the one to get the axe than have my pay and benefits cut by 5 or 10% for SURE, as well.

      Jobs are cut for a reason -- they are no longer needed and/or no longer add to the value of the company.

      I don't know what Rose-colored glasses you're wearing, but the IT industry has been in a downward spiral for some time now & companies have mergers and layoffs so they can survive and hopefully become more profitable in tough times. Without the merger, it's possible handspring might dry up and everyone there would be out of work. Or, someone else could have baught them and fired half of the workers. Losing only 125 people ain't bad between two businesses of this size.

  47. Or the alternative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but can you imagine the controversy over offering "Hand Pilots For Sale"

  48. Good for everyone: Jeff and Donna are back by goofrider · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Handspring has been losing money and slipping market share. It probably will go broke if Palm weren't gonna acquire it. (See the story on The Register.) There'll be one less competitor anyways if Handspring cease to exist.

    What's good, however, is that Jeff Hawkins will return as CTO and Donna Dublinsky will return as a board member. They were the founders of the original PalmPilot company and left because of the (mis)management of US Robotics/3Com. Their return to Palm Inc will surely bring more innovations to Palm Inc.

  49. A sad day by M_Carling · · Score: 2

    This is sad. Less competition means lesser features and higher prices. Sony is good competition, but more competition is always better for the consumers and -- in the long run -- for everyone.

    I hope Sony introduces something to compete with the Tungsten/Treo lines.

  50. Re:Springboard... a bad idea by Lxy · · Score: 1

    Yes, but can you add a GPS and a back massager to a compact flash slot? :-)

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  51. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by goofrider · · Score: 2, Informative

    The PalmPilot company was founded by Jeff Hawkins and Donna Dublinsky. 3Com bought it via its aquisition of U.S. Robotics. Jeff and Donna soon left to found Handspring. 3Com spun off Palm years later.

    Read the other replies for further details.

  52. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by smartalix · · Score: 1

    OK, so it wasn't a direct spinoff, but why go back to Palm now? Are they doing that badly? I own Treo myself, and it's a good machine. Did they ever intend to make it work on their own?

    --
    Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  53. Palm/Handspring timeline by dsandler · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, the official press release contains a nice summary timeline:

    1995 - U.S. Robotics purchases Palm, Inc.

    1996 - Palm introduces the PalmPilot 1000 and 5000 organizers.

    1997 - 3Com purchases U.S. Robotics

    1998 - Hawkins, Dubinsky and Colligan leave Palm to create Handspring

    2000 - Palm executes an Initial Public Offering, separating from 3Com

    2001 - Palm begins building separate businesses

    * Todd Bradley named Palm Solutions executive vice president and chief operating officer (June 1)
    * Palm announces plans to create OS subsidiary (July 27)
    * Palm OS subsidiary acquires assets and talent from Be, Inc. (Aug. 16)
    * David Nagel is named Palm OS subsidiary president and chief executive officer (Aug. 27)

    2002 - Palm further builds on two businesses

    * OS subsidiary creation completed (Jan. 1)
    * Bradley promoted to president and chief operating officer of Palm Solutions (May 2)
    * OS subsidiary named PalmSource
    * PalmSource names founding board of directors (June 24)
    * Bradley named Palm Solutions chief executive officer (June 25)
    * Palm Solutions and PalmSource move to separate campuses (August)
    * Sony invests $20 million in PalmSource, marking first outside investment (Oct. 8)
    * PalmSource adds four new licensees in year
    * IRS approves the spin-off as tax-free for U.S. citizens' federal income-tax purposes (December)

    2003 - Palm announces plans to acquire Handspring

    1. Re:Palm/Handspring timeline by aSlowOldGuy · · Score: 1

      Weren't the first Palms actually called the Pilot 1000 and Pilot 5000? If memory serves me right, Palm got into a hoo-ha with the Pilot Pen Corporation, which why they gradually phased out the term "Pilot" - Palm Pilot for generation 2, then finally Palm for generation 3.

  54. Handspring? Good lord. by Glytch · · Score: 1

    Right now, I'd pick Palm, because I've been fighting for the past goddamn HOUR to synchronize my goddamn Visor Deluxe.

    "Sorry! Our FAQ and customer support services are temporarily offline.
    We are experiencing a temporary interruption in our FAQ and customer support services due to routine server maintenance or excessive traffic. The remainder of our site is unaffected. We are taking active steps to restore services as soon as possible. We apologize for any inconvenience. Please return later."

    Of course the shopping section is unaffected, so you can buy all the miserable Treos you want, but GOD FORBID I'd actually want SUPPORT for a device that I paid good money for. This message has been up for the past three months, by the way. Idiots. I'm never buying from them again. Months of server maintenance or peak traffic? Not fucking likely.

    And that's my rant for the day.

    1. Re:Handspring? Good lord. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though you're using the usb cradle, the serial port designation in your hotsync configuration was spontaneously changed.

      Change "ports" and sync again. It's happened to me before.

    2. Re:Handspring? Good lord. by Glytch · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I tried. Then I tried physically different USB ports. Then I tried loading and unloading the kernel modules involved, then I tried unplugging all other USB devices. Then I tried combinations of the above. Then I tried a hard reset, and retrying everything above from a clean slate. Then I tried everything above after a reboot.

      Now I'm simply *pissed* *off*. The last thing I did last night before going to bed was backup the damn thing. The first thing I did this morning was attempt to synchronize it with some news sites downloaded hourly for offline reading. I apparently missed the memo where I gained the ability to telepathically control Handspring hardware in my sleep, rendering it unable to sychronize merely by a subconcious thought.

      What a piece of crap. I'm never buying from Handspring, or any Handspring-related company, ever again.

  55. Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by Selecter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    is mistaken. I guess there are poeple in this world that love gadgets for gadgets sake but I never could figure out a use for a PDA in my life. Of course, I like life to be pretty blase. Maybe you get up and go Class A thrive on artificial corporate induced pressure types can tell me what you actually use a PDA for that cant be done with other things just as well or almost as well and I get get more perspective on it.

    1. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Informative

      A PDA can do so many things, but I think people use the calendar function most. An electronic calendar has several advantages over regular ones. The biggest in my opinion is that you can synchronize it with one or more computers. You can have the same calendar at home, at work and on the road. The biggest advantage of that is if you loose your PDA you still have all your data left. If you loose a regular calendar it's gone.
      Another great thing about PDA-calendars is the search function. You can easily search through your whole calendar in a matter of seconds.
      It's also very easy to edit the info in a PDA-calendar. Sure you can do that in a regular one as well, but it usually looks pretty messy afterwards.

      --
      Martin
    2. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by sean000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you kidding? Most of my life I was one of those types who wrote things I needed to remember down on random pieces of paper that I shoved in my pocket, lost on my desk, threw away by accident, etc. I lack organizational skills, have a hard time remembering things, and I like gadgets. I tried carrying a paper & pen organizer in college. It worked okay, but I had a hard time finding notes I had written... was it two weeks ago or two months ago? With a PDA I can jot random notes and find them later in an instant with the search feature. I can have all the same addresses in my computer for e-mail and in my PDA for when I need to send a package from the post office. With the calendar, task list, and reminders I no longer suffer from as much anxiety about what I'm forgetting. Plus I've got a pocket calculator, pocket games, free databases that include conversion charts, drink recipes, a basic Spanish dictionary, and anything else I decide to download. Not bad for a hundred bucks. The Handspring Visor Deluxe was the best PDA I ever owned for the money. I had been using a PocketPC on loan from the office, but switched back to the Handspring soon after. The PocketPC was neat, but it just doesn't handle the simple organizational stuff as well.

    3. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk such shit. Your argument can be applied to others too. Anybody who thinks they *need* a television, or a cell phone or a car is mistaken. Yes, you can duplicate the most commonly used features of a PDA with pen and paper, but that's not as convenient.

    4. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Actually, PDA's are very useful.


      I use mine for the phone book. But, then replaced the scraps of paper I keep for must read books, must see movies and must get record albums. Also, I have software security on it to secure and collect passwords that I use for the myriad of systems I manage and accounts around the internet.


      They are truly a useful device. PDA's are backed up on my PC thus if the PC is lost the PDA data isn't OR if the PDA is lost the PC data isn't. Those paper items sometimes disappear.

    5. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by thynk · · Score: 1

      I guess that's the difference between the masses of the great unwashed and the geeks. The geeks look at a problem that can be solved with a gadget. The herds of people look at the toys the geeks have made and say, "Hey, that's kind of neat. I need one too."

      Do you *NEED* one? No, of course not. You don't even *NEED* a computer. Do you want one for the toy appeal or do you look at it as a tool that you can use to make your life better, easier or more organized? Since I do a bit of development for handheld devices, I think I know what catagory I fall into.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    6. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      One of my favorite uses for the Palm Pilot is reading. For example, if you go to Baen.com you'll see many popular books for download FREE! And if you like the free ones, you can pay for electronic copies of later ones in the series. For example, I loved the Honor Harrington "On Basilisk Station", so I started buying the books. Soon I found it easier to buy the electronic versions and read those on my CLIE. Baen even included a CD with the latest Honor book that contains EVERY HONOR BOOK EVER MADE in electronic form! Combine that with the low price of electronic books bought online (4-5 dollars per) and you have convienence at its finest.

    7. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by nanosmurf · · Score: 1

      I picked up copy of PocketQuicken for my Handspring a few months ago. Best thing I ever did. I've turned from hard working slob with no money and credit card debt to hard working slob with some money but NO credit card debt. At the risk of sounding like an info-mercial: Sure, you can do that in a paper and pencil chequebook, but put the portability of palmOS-based accounting program with the power of a home-system-based Quicken (syncs up nice and simple) and finances are suddenly amazingly simple. That, and it plays solitaire.

    8. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      My wife and I have done something similar. We've loaded BankBooks and BudgetBook on her HandSpring. She has never *had* so much control over our finances before. Now instead of trying to keep the checkbook straight or keep a computer program up to date (NOT EASY), she just whips out her Palm and uses it like a checkbook records on crack. The BudgetBook program then looks at our expenditures and gives a nice pie chart of what went where.

    9. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      Are you trolling or just a luddite??

      Just because you don't need one doesn't mean that everyone doesn't need one.

      Personally I use mine as a diary, a phonebook, and a data repository for hundreds of useful notes that I can *search* (as well as a universal remote control and for playing chess/cards :) The fact I can search for and find any note that I may have taken (a login for a journal, or a IP address for a computer, or a scientific protocol, or a recipe for a buffer solution, or a listing of all the journal articles I have in my bibtex database, or the brand of film I used to take pictures with two years ago) is incredibly useful to me. The fact that it fits in my pocket and I can take a note at any time makes it all the more powerful. (And my PDA is only a Palm IIIx that's four years old and bought second-hand; it's nothing fancy)

    10. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by FredKiesche · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree. Baen has the right idea. I use my Sony Clie during my 3.0+ hours a day commuting. Heck, during the work day I sometimes use the Clie more than my PeeCee, it's where I keep my calendar, phone numbers, etc. ...And I'm not a Type A corporate type, either! Since upgrading to the Clie from the Handspring Pro, I also listen to music during my commute. I use Music Maker Juke Box and transfer .mp3 files to the plain Memory Stick (sorry Sony, I'm not falling for your digital rights management crap again). 128MB gets me two or more albums per stick, two sticks gets me through the commute, lunch and any walks I take during the day. Great stuff.

      --
      "Ah Mr. Gibbon, another damned, fat, square book. Always, scribble, scribble, scribble, eh?" (The Duke of Gloucester, o
    11. Re:Anybody that thinks they *need* a PDA..... by Dammerung · · Score: 1

      That's 'xactly why I have one. I have an m505, and I love it. My mom uses a Visor, and I can say it's a pretty good little buddy to have to remember stuff. I hope this deal turns out well, though...

  56. Handspring pushed Palm? by lpret · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If I recall correctly, Palm had just put out it's V series (which I had for many years) and was already working on it's IIIc. This is compared to Handspring's brick that was about the same size/weight/everything of a III series Palm.

    The only thing Handspring brought to the table was their Springboard technology. I don't know if any of you did any work on it, but it was nice because it used the PCMCIA design, so it was easy to develop.

    Now, Sony did do a lot, simply because they hit the market at the right time -- just when colour was about to hit. This meant that their name as a multimedia giant was used to lure people in, plus, they're just damn good at making electronics. I would have really loved to see them go with Pocket PC, but it has helped PalmOS to have such a strong company behind it.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:Handspring pushed Palm? by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

      PCMCIA != Springboard. Sure they look ike a CPU memory bus, but they are very different!

  57. Pocket PCs are Free by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

    Why purchase a Palm or Handspring when you can get a pocket pc for free?

    1. Re:Pocket PCs are Free by mrkurt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they're free if you want to sell your soul to the Devil of Hell by buying Visual Studio.NET. Seriously, though, who uses a Pocket PC or any other device for more than schedule, a contact list, and email? Oh, yeah, and web browsing, too-- all of which I can do with my wireless phone.

      Palm and Handspring could learn something from this: that there is a convergence of portable devices, and that the real opportunity could be around the corner with wireless networks of one kind or another.

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    2. Re:Pocket PCs are Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I want a monthly service fee on my PDA? (Like the one you have on your cell phone)

    3. Re:Pocket PCs are Free by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1

      Well, even better, because you can get paid $100 to get a cell phone.

    4. Re:Pocket PCs are Free by mrkurt · · Score: 1

      You don't take "no" for an answer, do you?

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
    5. Re:Pocket PCs are Free by mrkurt · · Score: 1
      Why would I want a monthly service fee on my PDA? (Like the one you have on your cell phone)

      Unless you are a high-caste hacker, I don't imagine you can get free cellular service on your PDA-- maybe you have a tin can and a string plugged into your serial port?

      --
      Always look on the briight side of life! (whistle, whistle)
  58. Yep. I just bought one. by mhore · · Score: 1

    Can't wait for it to get here... :-)

    $199 factory recertified from tiger direct. Mmmm...

    Mike.

    --

    Mmmm......sacrelicious.

  59. Primer by cgenman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The $30 one at K-Mart and Target is, I believe, a rolodex. Unfortunately, it is fixed-purpose electronics and cannot run external programs. Not much memory, no backups, no real pen imput... It is a toy, like those little electronic things with rubber keypads in pink with Hello Kitty on the cover.

    Entry level, $100 Palm based devices (From Palm, Handspring, or Sony) have an extensible, programmable OS. This allows for example, for encrypted password storage vaults, automatically synchronized web page readers, sketch programs, heirarchical planning software, thesauruses, Japanese Dictionaries... whatever someone can think of. They also generally have a greyscale screen and an adequate amount of RAM (well, sony does anyway). When you go up in price you spend more to get brightly colored screens, slightly faster processors, and model-specific features like built-in cameras, cellphones, or MP3 players.

    Spend a bit more (300+)and you have a Pocket PC or Linux based device. These are larger and heavier than Palm-based PDAs, but have more compatible software (It is easier to port an existing Windows application to a Pocket PC handheld than to a Palm PDA. Same for Linux). They usually have faster processors, but slower software which take up significantly more ram. Someone else on this board can extoll the virtues of the above, I simply don't like how large and inelegant those devices can be.

    Personally I find my Clie to be terrifically useful compared to the dayrunner which was too large to fit in a pocket. But not everyone does. Truthfully, if I hadn't gone out looking for useful software, it wouldn't provide any added benefit over a standard day planner.

    In short, the value of one depends on what kind of person you are. Do you love technology? Do you normally keep notes digitally? Do you travel a lot, network frequently, or have an irregular schedule?

    I know this whole segue is a bit offtopic, but I hope it helps.

    1. Re:Primer by Jungle+guy · · Score: 1
      Spend a bit more (300+)and you have a Pocket PC or Linux based device. These are larger and heavier than Palm-based PDAs, but have more compatible software (It is easier to port an existing Windows application to a Pocket PC handheld than to a Palm PDA. Same for Linux).

      I agree that there are a lot of software avaliable for windows, and that it is easier to port them to Pocket PC than to Palm. But check out Handango or Palmgear and you will notice that there are a lot of programs avaliable for Palm OS, and my guess is that the selection is wider than for the Pocket PC.

      A preview owner of a Palm PDA, I got as a gift the iPaq 1910, and I am having a hard time to find the programs I need. Freeware games, like Galax, seem to be in shortage for the Pocket PC.

  60. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by guterman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why give up now? Well, last week Handspring announced it was on the verge of NASDAQ delisting.

  61. Hopefully the Treo 600 Will Survive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Handspring had just announced the successor to the Treo 300 at a Sprint conference.

    It wasn't a public conference and there aren't many details. It appears to include a memory slot (not Handspring's), a somewhat smaller form factor than the Treo, no flip cover and a brighter screen. One would imagine that it would also come with Palm 5 and decent processor/memory as well. (Look up http://www.treocentral.com for a couple more details.)

    I have a 300, I wish it were a bit smaller but I'm happy with it. I have (among other things) a fat email client with support for viewing attachments (no conduits or special servers required) that's very useful and a VNC-like client that's pretty cool (though it's a bit like looking at your monitor through a keyhole). The data connection is pretty fast if I have good reception. Biggest weakness: slow browser (caused by processor and/or proxy servers).

    I looked at Pocket PC phones first, but they were all too big for me and lacked the thumbboard.

  62. Oh no by Bodrius · · Score: 1

    Too many... terrible, terrible, masturbation jokes... approaching on the horizon...

    Someone stop this merger before it's too late!

    --
    Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  63. PDA by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    Well, I think some folks might argue with you on case styles. Yes, some of the older Handsprings (like the Visor Pro in my back pocket) look gastly, but the Treo and Edge look pretty sweet.

    Personally, since I've owned a Visor Pro for almost three years now, and have found very few faults (except for the lack of OS upgradability), I would probably buy a ...

    Sharp Zarus SL-5600! Heheheh. I've lusted after one of those since I first picked one up at BestBuy (who no longer carries them!!!). There's something to really love about opening a terminal window on your hand-held and ssh'ing into your main Linux box!

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
    1. Re:PDA by uberdood · · Score: 1
      There's something to really love about opening a terminal window on your hand-held and ssh'ing into your main Linux box!
      Ok, I'll bite the troll. What would that be? Interactive login session? On the Zaurus keyboard? Tunneling other protocols? Again, whatever you're doing on the Zaurus falls back to data entry. Secure web browsing? You do that on most handhelds that have a we bbrowser. Sure e-mail? When I'm out and about with the PDA, I'm usually out of WiFi or wired ethernet range, so I'm reading/responding/writing offline anyways.

      Geek factor? Sure. Nice to have? Can be, although I'd rather have a 2lb subnotebook with a real keyboard and a decent display that doesn't use microfonts. Killer PDA app? Nada.
      --
      "Population 1,656"
  64. This is good for many reasons by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a good thing. Why? Because Palm/Handspring gets to consolidate the product line. Some people were bitching and moaning about "what gets dumped? Palm's good stuff or Handspring's good stuff?" I would assume it would be Palm's BAD stuff and Handpring's BAD stuff, thus leaving a tighter product line with the best features from both companies. Sounds like a good deal to me.

    This rings familiar from the Apple times. Remember how many products Apple had? And then they had the clones. Buy out the clone licenses, tighten up the product line, and voila. Apple is much more focused. Consumers in the Palm market will have fewer, but BETTER options. No more confusion between 16 SLIGHTLY different products, but instead having more features in fewer models.

    I'm an optimist I guess...

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    1. Re:This is good for many reasons by ComputerDave78 · · Score: 1
      I agree that this will bring good things in the future, I've been using a Handspring Visor Deluxe for close to 3 years now and I couldn't be happier. It's always worked, and I've never had to do anything but upgrade the OS (which went smoothly) and change a few batteries.

      I'm very interested to see what features from both they incorporate into their new devices.

  65. A bit of histroy: Let's not forget U.S. Robotics by goofrider · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jeff and Donna founded Palm Computing, but they needed captial, so they merged their company with U.S. Robotics.

    All is fine until 3Com acquired U.S. Robotics for its line of telecommunication products, and got Palm Computing as part of the deal. 3Com never really knew how to manage the subsidary, Jeff and Donna got upset will the management, so they made an OS licensing deal with Palm Computing and left 3Com to found Handspring.

    The usual IIRC restrictions apply to this bit of info. :)

  66. Re:prices? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but you can't buy any new PDA from www.handspring.com anymore. Models advertised vs models available for sale from Handsrping has been slowly declining for months now :(

  67. Nobody Mentioned Support by Zwobu · · Score: 2, Informative
    The one thing noone seems to have mentioned so far is that Handspring product support and product reliability generally sucks, and hopefully Palm will improve upon that. I've been using a Handspring Visor Prism and VisorPhone combo as my smartphone for a few years now, and I replaced it THREE TIMES under warranty. Each time was a struggle with Handspring support, and they would never agree to cross-ship. I bought this combo while it was still a new product, and paid close to $1000 for it (yes I know how quickly the price came down - don't remind me). It died again shortly after the warranty expired, and I'm replacing it with a used one from The Visor Store.

    Why not just buy a Treo? I refuse to pay $500 for a smartphone with poor reliability from a company with demonstrably poor customer service. This assessment is borne out by my own experience over the past few years and the reviews I've read on customer-ratings sites. Nearly every one of these sites contains complaints from Treo users about these issues, and it's a deadly combination. The device itself is great, but for what it costs it should work reliably, and when it doesn't, Handspring should be willing to replace it with a minimum of hassle. A Treo user should not have to go without for two weeks until their device comes back from the shop.

    I'm buying a warranty with my used Visor that will ensure I maintain a working device for one year. By then, hopefully there will be an acceptable alternative to Handspring in an reasonable price range. Maybe it will even come from Palm.

  68. neither, probably a Sony. by sailboatfool · · Score: 0

    Market share is what this is about.

    --
    He is the best sailor who can steer within fewest points of the wind, and exact a motive power out of the greatest obsta
  69. Re:palm == ugly by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Troll

    I bet this guy is happy to see you!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  70. What I want... by SpyderFan · · Score: 1
    I want a Treo-like device with MP3, and SD/MMC.

    Kyocera 7135 is nice, but the form factor is not pocketable.

    GPS would be nice, but not necessary.

    1. Re:What I want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not pocketable? By this, I understand that you either have very small pockets, or a camel toe. Seriously, I carry my 7135 in a number of different pockets, daily. With room to spare. Unless you're speaking from experience, try visiting a (no I do not work for) Verizon store and asking to play with one.

  71. Handera by jpmahala · · Score: 1

    I'd buy neither. I'd get a Handera.

    (the sad part is that I own a TRGpro..)

    1. Re:Handera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I had wondered why they had not announced a follow on to the 330, which ahd received very good reviews. If you followed the link in the parent post you got the following:
      DES MOINES, Iowa - April 16, 2003 - HandEra today issued an End Of Life (EOL) notice for both of its Palm OS based handheld products, the TRGpro and HandEra 330. Due to cost increases associated with licensing the OS, HandEra will no longer be able to ship products containing the Palm OS after May 31st.

      "We regret the impact that this announcement will have on our customers," said Mark Kubovich, President of HandEra. "HandEra will offer new products to serve the OEM mobile computing market in the near future."

      Limited stock of the HandEra 330 is available to fulfill last time buy orders. Last time buy orders will be considered on a case by case basis.

      I do not know why they choose to blame Palm, but as I noted above, they were about a year overdue for an update on the 330 and they may have decided not to throw any more money down that rat hole. If they had a good follow on they could have tacked on the extra software cost.

      The 330 was not cheap, but it had an excellent rep for usability and reliability. I was thinking of buying one but I wanted to see what the next model would be like after Sony brought out its new CLIE's last year.
  72. You say "memory stick"... by Namarrgon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... like it's a good thing :-/

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  73. Good deals on springboard gimcracks? by timothy · · Score: 1

    Several months ago, I bought a springboard backup unit, which used to cost around $50 I think, for $8 at Walmart on clearance. Yesterday, bought an EyeModule2 (the 640x480 digital camera, also a springboard module) for $50. While those take care of the main things I had wanted for that slot (after 4 years of use, I figured I wanted a backup ;)), I wonder if anyone can point to other interesting, now-cheap springboard units ...

    I'd like to find an ultra-cheap GPS springboard, but so far those are still sort of expensive (and hard to find anyhow).

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Good deals on springboard gimcracks? by plhys · · Score: 1

      Where did you buy the eyemodule (sp?) 2. Where was the Walmart with the back up units on clearance. Thanks, Paul Sure hope "PalmSpring" brings back the handsping slot. BTW I sure like my Deluo GPS that I use with a laptop. Cost 89 c shipping included.

    2. Re:Good deals on springboard gimcracks? by timothy · · Score: 1

      The eyemodule came from a Walmart in eastern Knoxville, TN (2 days ago), and the backup unit came from another Knoxville location, but that was 6 months ago. I have not been looking at springboard units particularly in the meantime, since the only one I figured I needed was the backup; there's a GPS unit that used to be insanely expensive that I imagine really might now have come down considerably, if you can find a store that still has one :)

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  74. Innovation at the cost of reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    snipI guess one of my concerns is that Handspring has some really cool features that Palm may want to keep.

    What, like shitty hardware? I've gone through five handspring handhelds in warranty, from Platinum to Pro to Edge, and they've all had problems. And, a good friend is currently fighting with them over his Treo 180, which he's replaced four times for hardware failure. Their response? "We'll send you a refurb from our warehouse, 'cause we're not making them any more." Nice.

  75. A Special Kind of Moron You Are by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow! They really broke the mold when they created you didn't they!?!

    Listen up. The IT (tech) industry is the only industry thats designed to minimize and or eliminiate ITSELF. From the printing press to the cotton gin to the airplane to the computer to the PDA, each technological advance allows mankind to do the same amount of work or more with less people/workers/employees.

    Simply put, Handspring is screwing up. They need to be bought or they're out of business. THe only reason to buy them is to gain marketshare and cut expenses. Whenever companies merge there are always redundancies. You don't even know if all of those 125 workers will be tech workers. But does a company really need duplicate anything? Do they need 8 office admins if they previously did fine with 4? Do they need two cooks if they only had 1 before? The same goes for programmers or netadmins. They don't need anymore of those.

    Contrary to your idiotic claims there are NOT always alternatives to laying off people. If you are redundant, than you're redundant. Should they keep you on and pay you to sweep the floors instead of eliminating your position? Thats worse than unwise, its insulting.

    Perhaps Hewlet-Packard should have just kept bleeding money. Because obviously executive pay always makes the difference. When a company is losing billions of dollars the millions paid out to the top brass REALLY makes a difference eh?

    Do you think the technology industry is special or something? That workers in this industry are a special breed of citizen deserving of protections others do not receive? This is what happens to EVERY maturing industry. Consolidation and elimination of redundancies.

    DEAL.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:A Special Kind of Moron You Are by drgroove · · Score: 2

      You are completely ignoring the options of re-purposing workers to prevent redundancies, reducing product prices while maintaining production levels, modifying production techniques to reduce prices, changing parts vendors for less expensive materials, using existing product lines as OEM products for 3rd-party companies... the list goes on and on. When you are restructuring a company, the only limit is one's imagination. The only thing you've proven by your statements is that you lack one.

    2. Re:A Special Kind of Moron You Are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be correct about the nature of the industry but that doeasn't mean the original poster is naive or whining about it. I agree with the basic premise the original poster held.

      Today's upper management is rarely concerned about their employees. I've seen CEOs receive bonuses in quarters where they had to lay off workers to cut costs and stay profitable. They could just have easily taken pay cuts themselves. These workers were not redundant, but they lost their jobs because the upper management had to meet the numbers to get their bonuses and pay for their million dollar vacation homes. If upper management does a poor job it's never their fault as it was just the market or the economy. If they really screw up, they simply let a few workers go, and everything is back in the black again. I have never seen a CEO refuse a bonus or take a pay cut because they fucked up. I have seen them lay off workers because they did. Do you have an explanation for this behavior?

      Another example is a company that was under a hiring freeze and restricted travel and expenditures because they were not doing well financially. Well, it seems these restrictions only applied to everyone else since the CEO continued to use his company-reimbursed limo service, the company jet for personal travel, and spent over $50,000 replacing his perfectly functional office furniture. Oh, and a few months after the office furniture was bought, they decided that business was so bad they needed to lay off some non redundant workers.

      Are these examples of an industry that constantly minimizes itself? I doubt it. Hell, you're probably one of those people that believes the inflation of executive compensation is a myth or is justified. Personally, I find it all very sad.

    3. Re:A Special Kind of Moron You Are by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      Wow, a special kind of jerk I think we have here. This is short sighted business sense you show. The kind of thing that is putting America behind other countries. You only consider the immediate cash consequences.

      What about worker loyalty, those who stay with the company for longer periods of time are more likely to be more profitable than those that leave.

      What about keeping a worker is certainly better than giving a worker to the competition. Especially a worker that already knows how your business works. Do you want him working for you or the competition?

      What about the costs of retraining new employees later when the company starts to expand again?

      How about this, while the company is throwing away perfectly good workers instead of using them to explore new concepts and product lines you lose market share to the competition who just hired your old employees and developed the new Wireless high speed Widget 5000+ w/BBQ flavor. It's something you could have had but lost, it's something your competition has. And it's something that loses you to lose out your marketshare for Old Widget 2000 w/no flavoring because everyone would rather get a Widget/BBQ seasoning combination Widget.

      Meanwhile, your employees that you desperately need to keep on start jumping ship because they worry they are next to get axed (since they can't count on loyalty, neither can the business). Then they go work for the competition, or as in the case of Handspring, become the competition.

      None of this is good for shareholders. It's bad for the economy, bad for workers, bad for innovation, certainly bad for stock holders in the long term. They only people it helps are high level management waiting on the big fat bonus for "looking out for stockholder's interests".

    4. Re:A Special Kind of Moron You Are by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      What on Earth are you basing your logic on?

      The workers who get laid off are NOT being hired by the company's competititors. The competitors have already went thru phases of downsizing themselves. Someone who gets laid off from HP doesn't get hired by IBM or Sun. Sheesh. They spend anywhere from 6 to 20 months looking for a new job and settle for about 2/3rds to half their pay at a very lower profile company.

      Handspring was formed during the GOOD times. It wasn't because of any fear of layoffs it was because the founders of Palm didn't feel the company was heading in the right direction. Do you consider founders and CEO's to be normal type employees?

      Very few people these days in this kind of an ecomony are jumping ship because they're afraid of getting laid off. Where would they jump ship too? Do you know of some secret supply of jobs?

      Lastly who says a worker who stays with the company for a long period of time is better than those who don't? How do you know they aren't just sticking around for seniority bonuses? Perhaps they've stuck around because they have no drive or ambition. Did those thoughts ever cross your mind?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  76. "The hand test...." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...and the hold it in the other hand test?"--

    If only women used criteria like that for dating...
    To be fair, of course, I should be allowed to try out their expansion port, in return.

  77. Re:T-Mobile Sidekick by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1
    ... seems to have been discontinued.


    At least I can't find it at their website anymore.


    (doing a google search...)


    Ah, there it is.


    From their site:


    Please Note: Due to overwhelming demand, Sidekick is currently unavailable. Please check back soon!
    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  78. A sad story by dmccarty · · Score: 1
    As an early Palm developer I had hoped to get in on the IPO of the wildly-hyped Palm stock. Imagine my millions if I had bought pre-IPO ($20) and sold at the all-time high (~$80)! But I didn't, so I waited for a good time to buy some.

    Two years later I was thankful I waited: Palm stock was down 80% and so was Handspring. So I bought at those bargain prices (Palm at $3.69, Handspring at $2.94) thinking how fortunate I was to be getting such a steal. But a year later even my "bargain" was down 80%! I guess I didn't get such a steal after all.

    Palm shareholders got screwed by a reverse 1:20 split (meaning that a pre-split Palm would be now be trading at $0.60, not $12.15) and now we're about to get screwed again by getting Palm shares instead of Handspring for nowhere near the price we paid for them.

    Oh, well. I guess that's why they call it speculation.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  79. Sony Clicke is the best by Tighe_L · · Score: 1

    nuff said

  80. apple redux by yoha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This sounds remarkably like the process that Apple went through. Apple liscensed their OS to compete better with WinTel. After reducing their prices slightly but not really adding innovation, Apple bought the competition. I can't really comment on whether Apple is better off today, or what impact this will have on Palm.

  81. ipaq 1910 is smaller by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/hp1910-review.html

    They have a picture compairing the Tungen T and Palm V.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:ipaq 1910 is smaller by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Cool link, thanks. It's hard to tell from the perspective but the Palm m505 does look thinner doesn't in? Thickness is the most important dimension to me. Interesting that the 1910 is not as wide. I'd like to hold it in my hand and see what it's like.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  82. PocketPC by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1, Troll
    If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely?

    You're going to hate this, but I'd probably get a PocketPC. I used to have a Vx and then got an iPAQ from work.

    The iPAQ is bigger and bulkier and the battery life does suck. Oh yes, and I've had it crash about 4 or 5 times but ..

    The software! The diary, notes and calendar is way more powerful than Palm's. Varying snoozes on appointments, alarms on tasks, multiple addresses on contacts - the list goes on. Oh yes, and I'm a heavy Outlook user, so it's a boon to have decent Outlook compatibility (KeyContacts on the palm was great - but nothing else would replace the other built in apps and still sync with Outlook).

    Also I love the today screen. I have several plug ins and it shows me everything I need to know on one page.

    Finally I know some people hate ActiveSync but I like it for one major reason. I can pick my PPC out of the cradle at any time and know that it's synced with my Outlook. On palms I'd have to hit the button on a regular basis.

    Would I go back to Palms? Yes, but only if they dropped their prices (they're a tad pricey) and substantially beefed up the built in software and syncing. Would I go for a Linux PDA? Haven't really thought about it to be honest. For me, I don't care what the OS is - just how well it does the stuff I need (it could be written in Cobol for all I care).

    Neither the PPC or Palm are the best. Both have pros and cons. But I can put up with the fact that the PPC is bigger, bulkier and eats batteries quicker because the PIM stuff is more powerful.

    Of course, YMMV.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:PocketPC by Admiral1973 · · Score: 1
      You must be my exact double. I also used to use a Palm Vx exclusively until someone at work gave me an iPaq to try out. I've been using it for about six months and I'm impressed with it, aside from the occasional crash (it wouldn't be a Windows-based OS without crashes). I'm not a big Outlook user, but I do keep my contacts in Outlook at home, and it's great to know that the iPaq is always synched with the PC. I spent $100 on a 256 MB SD card and downloaded PocketMusic, so now I take the iPaq to the gym and listen to my music that way, instead of my old bulky CD player or a $400 iPod. And with the expansion pack, I get WiFi or GPRS modem Internet access, neither of which I could do with my Palm.

      The add-on software selection is good too. For a while I ran SimCity on the iPaq, and someone pointed me to a version of Age of Empires for the iPaq. While I still think that the form factor is too small for large games like that, it's great that developers are releasing products like RTS games for handhelds.

      I'd like to try the Sharp Zaurus. I'm intrigued by the idea of a Linux-based handheld. I'm also interested in switching my iPaq OS to Linux (there are a few versions out there) but I don't want to lose all the functionality I have now.

      --
      Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
    2. Re:PocketPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why in the world is this modded as a troll? The guy suggests a different option, and there is no trollishness to it at all. I bet if someone switched the words "iPAQ" and "PocketPC" with "Palm" this would get modded +4:Informative. Just more proof of the hypocrisy that is Slashdot.

      Slashdot. Where we believe in free speech, as long as your opinion agrees with ours.

    3. Re:PocketPC by NoCoward · · Score: 1

      Interesting! Checkout this post of mine where I actually took the parent post and replaced PocketPC/iPAQ with Palm:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=66461&cid=61 16 983

      I got a +3 Interesting rating, while the parent poster got a -1 Troll.

      Fascinating.

    4. Re:PocketPC by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Interesting! Checkout this post of mine where I actually took the parent post and replaced PocketPC/iPAQ with Palm:

      Very neat and would definately go to show that this place is often moderated by people who follow group-think or just mod anything down that says anything nice about Microsoft (however put).

      Thanks for the enlightenment.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  83. Re:Springboard... a bad idea by M-2 · · Score: 1

    Except, of course, that for free you could get on the developer's list and get what you needed to develop your own Springboard devices, and the fact that Handspring was willing to help with promoting your stuff and giving technical assistance....

  84. The state of PDA's by badasscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what gets dropped? Palm which has probably a nicer "case" style or Handspring with its less desirable case but some features you don't find on Palms."

    Have you actually been following what's going on in handhelds these days? It doesn't sound like it. Palm and Handspring today make entirely different products. Palm makes PDA's; Handspring makes "communication products" - handhelds based on cel phone designs. There's no overlap - neither company has individual models comparable to the others'.

    But regardless, I wouldn't buy any model from either company. Others have already mentioned the Sony Clies - I have one of these, and I bought one for my wife too (she loves it). We don't need high-end features, and in the low-end the Clies have several features that Palms don't (and Handspring doesn't even make a low-end device). Sony also is far ahead of Palm in industrial design IMO - it's akin to, say, Dell vs. Apple. I'd actually love to have one of the real high-end models but don't feel they're worth $800. The recently announced top-end Clies, though, do have a lot of useful features - including built-in wireless, a built-in keyboard, camera, and MP3 player. In other words, the best of what both Palm and Handspring offer and in a much better-looking design. But still too expensive for me.

  85. choices? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely?

    Sharp SL-5500.... $199.00 at tiger direct... $238.00 with the 2 year no questions repair/replace warranty.

    no palm based device can even TOUCH that price/power/feature combination... and I also run palm apps on mine (just to piss off the Pocket PC users here)

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:choices? by darrylo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It really depends on your needs.

      If you want a cool handheld linux device, and you don't care that it is very "sub-optimal" for appointment/contact management, the Zaurus is very nice. Your geek coolness goes up by +10 if you have one.

      If appointments/contact management are important to you, you want some kind of palm or palm-compatible. IMO, the PIM software available for the palms are way beyond anything available for the Zaurus (and I'd be willing to pay US$100 for something really good for the Z, but it just doesn't exist).

      I have (or used to have) a Palm III, a TRGPro, and a Zaurus 5500. While the Zaurus is cool, I need good PIM apps, and the ones available for the Z do not meet my needs (the Z makes a really cool wireless web browser, though). Because of this, I can't use the Z, and so I recently started looking for a color palm. I eventually settled on a refurbished Sony Clie (the Zire 71 was attractive, but it uses Palm OS 5.2, which has the "new" grafitti, and I did not want to learn a new system). I'm really happy with the Clie (even though I personally try to avoid Sony products in general).

      Also, while you can, in theory, run palm apps on the Z, they supposedly run very slowly . I've thought about doing this, but decided against it after reading the reports.

    2. Re:choices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new graffiti isn't so much different though,
      just the way you write your i and k and t has become different, maybe somewhat more logical.

      Besides, the speed increase (over my old m100) is really nice.

    3. Re:choices? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      don't care that it is very "sub-optimal" for appointment/contact management,

      All the Ipaq owners here as well as the Palm users OOGLE over my calendar and contact manager. It's better than both. Granted these came with the last softweare update that is freely available on the internet.

      I have proven to many nay-sayers that love their Windows CE/pocketPC devices that my email,contact manager and calendar is much better than pocket outlook. and don't get me started on how much better the hancom suite is than microsoft own offering on word, excel and power point.

      I suggest you go touch a SL-5600 or an update your SL-5500 today. the refinements they have made cince a year and a half ago are massive.

      and the newest Z update that is in developer late beta right now is even better!

      I have owned palm devices cince the first one.. the Zaurus is the FIRST unit to dethrone the palm for me BECAUSE of the useability and that it feels as fast as the palm... something that no CE or pocketPC device can do.

      go get the developer 3.1 rom! you'll be really impresed!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:choices? by darrylo · · Score: 1

      I have the latest (stable) OpenZaurus 3.2.

      While it is quite impressive, the PIMs still suck (the impressiveness comes from the non-PIM stuff). As an example (and this is just one of many), try creating an appointment that lasts only 15 minutes, and give it an appropriate description. Now look at it in the full-day view; is that usable???? (For those of you without a Z, you see something like the top 5-pixels of an area that is supposed to display your appointment, of which around the top three pixels of your descriptive text are displayed (most of the text -- the bottom part -- is chopped off). The result is quite unreadable.)

      Please note that, when I compare the Z to the palm, I'm comparing it to third-party software like DateBk5 or Agendus. I wish that there was something comparable to these for the Z, but there isn't (and I'm more than willing to pay $100 for something that is as good and reliable as DateBk5 for the Z).

  86. not the newest ones by lpret · · Score: 1

    The newest HPs that are coming out this month do not have removable batteries. Kinda sucks, huh?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  87. Return of the King by zerocircle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This looks familiar, and it bodes well. Steve Jobs left Apple (involuntarily, admittedly) and started NeXT, which was bought by Apple. Result of management merger: Apple's current product line. Result of technology merger: Mac OS X.

    I'm still pretty darned satisfied with my Palm M500, and I'll happily keep using it, at least until the merger/shakedown results in a new product. As for competitive pressure: Sony, if not others, will still keep Palm on their toes.

  88. Common Practice. by juuri · · Score: 2, Interesting
    IBM has had this happen many times, the basic scenario goes like this:

    Someone reaches a SVP or equivelant level in a company. Realizes they have maxed their income potential.

    Finds something the current company isn't doing well. Finds other internal resources who feel the same.

    Starts a spin-off focusing primarily on what the big company is too slow to implement or too big care about.

    ... Profit! When the big company comes knocking a few years later. Everyone involved in the initial breakoff makes a huge chunk of change and usually ends up with a high position than before.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  89. I love my Palm Tungsten C. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose it for:
    - Crisp and clear display
    - 64Mb memory
    - Keyboard (very important)
    - 400Mhz ARM processor
    - Build-in WiFi
    - Existing software

    I love the WiFi, 2 examples:
    Palm Tungsten C VNC Client --> WiFi AccessPoint (router) --> Linux box --> VMware + VNC server --> Kazaa/Lite

    Palm Tungsten C --> WiFi AccessPoint (router) --> Linux box --> VMWare --> Palm HotSync

  90. Re:T-Mobile Sidekick by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

    The color units are coming out any day now! That is what's up.

  91. Re:Springboard... a bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GPS - yes Back massager - no

  92. What has Handspring done lately? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There definately was a time when both Handspring and HandEra where driving the Palm line forward with new features. But Handspring now only makes two models, the Treo 270 and the Treo 300. The rest of the Handspring line is reconditioned. My guess is that Handspring road-map for adopting PalmOS 5 did not match with Palm's road-map. By buying Handspring out, Palm can now work on a Treo line that is PalmOS 5 based and work with Sony on phasing out production of PalmOS 4 devices.

  93. Don't buy a PDA. Period. by tundog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If your a business person, and you use Outlook at work (don't we all?) then you don't want a bulky PDA. The killer PDA application is the whole Outlook paradigm: Calendar, Contacts, Inbox

    You need to do some homework on the features of cell phones out there and find one that has Outlook integration. Most can sync appointments and contacts back and forth. Some can download inbox email so you can read 'em offline. Some (Nokaia Communicator) can even connect to the net (with the disadvantage of dial-in costs, low battery life and being bulky & expensive - the speaker phone option on it is amazing though).

    In the end we are moving to devive fusion anyway and PDA as we know it will cease to exist. We'll all just be using funkier, move advanced cell phones.

    --
    All your base are belong to us!
    1. Re:Don't buy a PDA. Period. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your a business person, and you use Outlook at work (don't we all?)

      your logic failed in two ways...
      1. this is /.
      2. this is /.

    2. Re:Don't buy a PDA. Period. by tundog · · Score: 1

      fair enough...

      --
      All your base are belong to us!
  94. Sony Cli� by dentar · · Score: 1

    I have had a Sony Clié PEG-T615C for several months now and I'm thrilled with it. The other day I was looking at the brand spanking new Cliés at the store and these things are packed with features, and are still cheaper than the Palms.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  95. i1910 has a better screen by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1


    1910 has lower resolution, but when both screens are small, resolution doesn't really matter in the long run.

    1910 has a transreflective screen. (vs., for example, Tungten T's reflective screen) It makes a huge different in viewing quality.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  96. buy a cheap one by 73939133 · · Score: 1

    All PDAs have very serious software problems of one form or another. With Palm, it's the OS, with PocketPC, it's the UI, and with Linux PDAs, it's the desktop integration.

    If you want just a PDA, your best bet is to get a $99 Palm Zire or the Sony SJ-22 or SJ-33; they are fairly cheap, so you won't feel too bad getting a new one in a year.

    If you want to do custom programming for a handheld, consider a Linux PDA--Linux hardware may come and go, but you can be pretty certain that there will be Linux PDAs in the future and they will run, well, Linux.

    1. Re:buy a cheap one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the problem with the Palm OS?

      Loved it since I first used it(if you don't like the interface, their plenty of other launchers out there).

    2. Re:buy a cheap one by 73939133 · · Score: 1
      What's the problem with the Palm OS?

      Several really major problems:

      • Lots of functionality has no standard APIs. Handeras and Sonys were using different hires APIs from Palm, keyboard handling is different on all of them, sound and audio is different among all of them. In contrast, on a real operating system, there are well-defined drivers and interfaces for things like keyboards, audio I/O, and screens.
      • It doesn't give you a 32bit flat address space. As a consequence, for example, applications like Mapopolis have more functionality on PocketPC than on equally powerful Palms, and image and PDF viewers have a really hard time dealing with large images. Also, just porting software to the Palm is hard and expensive--there is actually a lot more of that "high end" software for Linux than for Palm.
      • It's unreliable: ill-behaved applications still force a reset of the entire handheld, even under PalmOS 5.0.
      • There is no package management and no directory structure: Palms accumulate huge amounts of stuff in their memory and it's hard to clean it up.


      I think PalmOS is roughly comparable to MS DOS 2.0. There were lots of great applications for DOS as well, but it wasn't much of an OS.
    3. Re:buy a cheap one by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Oops, make that "ill-behaved applications still force a reset of the entire handheld, even under PalmOS 5"; the problem hasn't gone away even in the latest minor releases.

  97. Telepathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Telepathy
    Yes.

    1. Re:Telepathy by unDees · · Score: 1

      I knew you were going to say that.

      --
      "I call a baby goat a 'goatse.'" -- my non-Internet-savvy 6-year-old stepdaughter
  98. Its official, resistance actually is futile by gt302 · · Score: 2

    The upstart has been assimilated, Handspring is finally dead: RIP Its always a sad day when an upstart company fails to make a full go of it. I love my Visor and have been very sad to see the decline of the Springboard modules and now the eventual death of the company. The only unique advantage Handspring had over the other palm device companies was the Springboard slot. They were never going to make it as a phone company anyway and Palm had them covered in the hand held market. They quite literally shot themselves in the head when they dropped the only compelling reason to buy a handspring, its expandability. What a treat it was to be able to modify at will the capability of the visor. GPS, Wireless Ethernet, Bluetooth, Digital Cameras, Cell phones, Visor brought these features to us in a palm device years before any other company started development. Sharing the development load over the community was a great decision that allowed Handspring to move quickly and stay on top of the latest technology without spending company resources. As always is the trend, products get smaller faster and more feature rich. I suppose Handspring's demise was an inevitability given its business model and lack of cutting edge design. From the stand point of a compulsive DIY'er, this is a sad day in muddville.

  99. this is beautiful by strombrg · · Score: 1

    ...because palm needs a stronger hand to keep microsoft at bay.

  100. Zire71 by Odyss · · Score: 1

    I a 71 to replace my V that had a worn Graffiti pad. It's got everything I want and a camera. Like my books on paper, my music with BIG speakers, and my internet with a mouse, no friends to phone, so I'm good with the 71. And the Clie wheel, the new toggle button is easier and better IMHO. Graffiti II does however suck,,xerox give me back my x,i,t,and k! Maybe Xerox should have bought Handspring for all us Graffiti aficionados!

  101. NOTICE: MODERATORS ARE STOOPID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This isn't the slightest bit insightful. What insight does this poster show?

    Informative, maybe. He is informing us that he wants a Zaurus. Well w00p-dee-shit.

  102. Apple and Palm by jeffmock · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed by the historical similarities between Apple/NeXT/Jobs and Palm/Handspring/Hawkins.

    Jobs/Hawkins creates visionary company with great products, both are amazing achievements.

    Frustrated by the big corporate thing Jobs/Hawkins goes off and starts NeXT/HS to do the next big thing enjoying much hype and early success.

    Apple/Palm lose market share, start making boring products, bumble through some bad business decisions, change CPUs to PPC/ARM and generally suffer from a lack of vision.

    Apple/Palm buys NeXT/HS for way more than it's worth to return the visionary guy to the fold.

    So, I wonder if we can use this to predict the future:

    Palm switches from ancient OS to Unix based OS.
    Palm puts out some new interesting products.
    Palm's core customers become bigger fans than ever.
    Palm becomes increasingly irrelevant as Microsoft increases market share.

    (I really wanted to fit the big soft drink executive and the movie company into the story, but I just couldn't find the analogy.)

    jeff

  103. Brillant business logic! by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    >Why don't we boycott Palm and PalmOS products, until Palm/Handspring management get their heads out of their asses and think about the employees that have been keeping their companies afloat, instead of their own pocket books.

    Yes, thats great business logic.

    Future advertising slogan from Palm: "Buy our products because we didn't lay off 125 employees!"

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  104. Palm & Handspring Quality Suck! by cc_pirate · · Score: 1

    This is not a troll.

    I've had a Palm and a Handspring and they both died within a year and half (just after the warranty). Neither was subjected to tough use and neither was ever dropped (as if that would matter anyway, since they should do shock and vibe testing on their products).

    Every person I know who's had a Palm has had it die or stop working the way it is supposed to within a year or two. N ~ 5 here. Combined with my experience, this tells me that there is something very unreliable about the whole Palm architecture.

    Frankly, I've come to the conclusion that Palm and Handspring's quality and reliability SUCK and I won't buy a Palm PDA ever again, which is too bad, as I actually liked the interface.

    My two cents....

    --

    "There are laws that enslave men, and laws that set them free. " - Sean Connery as King Arthur

  105. Ideo by bigbadbuccidaddy · · Score: 1

    Not that anyone will see this comment this far down and at my posting level, but Ideo did the design for both the Palm V and Handspring Visor products. They both look really good. And the new Palm Tungstens look to me like an evolution of the Palm V design, for the most part subtle improvements. Other than eliminating the ability to put the stylus on either side, and the flip cover on the other, that is.

  106. Zire by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

    I really like the Palm Zire, a $80 - $100 value, that I got free for buying four Michelin tires.

    Palm has reported that they have sold over a million Zires. http://news.com.com/2100-1041-1010264.html

    --
    Phillip
  107. A Special Kind of troll You Are by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 2
    I don't know if your flame is a troll, or if you yourself are stupid.

    The millions paid to the top 0.x% of the payroll(the CEO and his gang) are often paid at the expense of the rest of it. Example: a 1M$ quarterly bonus could pay 10 high-priced specialists for a year at 100k$ a pop. So when you yank the plug for 100 workers at 50k$, you get 50M$ or just about the payroll of the council (5M$ times 10 assholes).

    Considering the fact that ruining the life of tens of people for a stupid quarterly bonus is always the choice of the CEO, we are faced to a situation where the abuse of a few leads to the sacrifice of many. How altruistic.

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
  108. Alternatives seem to be dwindling by RedneckTek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I own a Handera 330. I love it; jog-wheel, hi-res screen, switchable backlight, CF & SD card slots. It really was best of breed when I got it. I've been hoping for sometime that they would release an updated version (possibly color, OS5). But I just discovered that they are exiting the Palm handheld arena.

    I don't want a phone/PDA. I would extremely miss my jog-wheel. Sony seems to be the only choice for a full featured PalmOS handheld now.

    Is the Zaurus a real alternative?

    --
    I gave up thinking of a cool sig
  109. After reading these answers, .......... by Selecter · · Score: 0

    I am more convinced than ever of the uselessness of PDA's. It saounds to me like there are a lot of Inspector Gadget's in /. land. And no, I'm not trolling. I really dont see the need for even the business types to use one. It's just another gadget to complicate my life even more, like a cellphone ( 80% of poeple who own them dont need one ) or a pager ( I used to have to wear one doing network service back in 1982, Arcnet and Netware 2.0! ) Maybe I am just a luddite - but I think most of these gadgets wind up owning their owners instead of them owning the device.

    1. Re:After reading these answers, .......... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Tell that to my wife. She went through about 5 statements of not being able to get the checkbook to balance right. The Palm programs let her fix her mistakes without having to rewrite the whole damn checkbook. Plus she uses it to keep track of her shopping list, personal schedule, favorite recipes (using the Palm is so much nicer than printing it out), and other stuff that I'm not even aware of. :-) I use mine for reading, taking down ideas, universal measurement conversion, and other little nicities.

      Basically, we make the technology work for us. Both of us could function without our handhelds, but the convieniece they bring is unparalleled. Cellphones and pagers (replaced by text messaging phones) are for very different functions. I barely even use my cell, but it's nice to have when I need it.

  110. Dual Band by LowellPorter · · Score: 1

    I wanted to get a Handspring Treo phone for my Sprint PCS service, however it doesn't have the capability to do dual bands in case you get out of Sprint's coverage. I hope Palm changes this when they take over the line.

  111. Likewise.... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    Employees should be loyal to their companies because they support the employees with regular pay. They wouldn't be employees without a company to hire them.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  112. Palm PDA vs IPAQ by NoCoward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely?"

    You're going to hate this, but I'd probably get a Palm. I used to have a iPAQ and then got an Vx from work.

    The Vx is bigger and bulkier and the battery life does suck. Oh yes, and I've had it crash about 4 or 5 times but ..

    The software! The diary, notes and calendar is way more powerful than iPAQ's. Varying snoozes on appointments, alarms on tasks, multiple addresses on contacts - the list goes on. Oh yes, and I'm a heavy Outlook user, so it's a boon to have decent Outlook compatibility (PocketOutlook on the ipaq was great - but nothing else would replace the other built in apps and still sync with Outlook).

    Also I love the today screen. I have several plug ins and it shows me everything I need to know on one page.

    Finally I know some people hate PalmSync but I like it for one major reason. I can pick my palm out of the cradle at any time and know that it's synced with my Outlook. On ipaqs I'd have to hit the button on a regular basis.

    Would I go back to iPAQ's? Yes, but only if they dropped their prices (they're a tad pricey) and substantially beefed up the built in software and syncing. Would I go for a Linux PDA? Haven't really thought about it to be honest. For me, I don't care what the OS is - just how well it does the stuff I need (it could be written in Cobol for all I care).

    Neither the PPC or Palm are the best. Both have pros and cons. But I can put up with the fact that the Palm is bigger, bulkier and eats batteries quicker because the PIM stuff is more powerful.

    Of course, YMMV.

    1. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you have a Palm Vx?
      Having had an IPAQ forced on my after having my Vx for years, I can most certainly say the Vx is MUCH smaller and less bulky than the IPAQ is, the battery life of the Vx is substantially longer than the IPAQ and in 4 years of packing my Vx full of all kinds of software, upto its 8mb limit, it has crashed on me maybe a dozen times.

      I don't believe you, sorry.

      (i used the IPAQ for about 2 days, after which I laughed at them and gave it back - now there was an example of a buggy slow crash-prone OS! It was an IPAQ 3850 I think with the 2002 OS.)

    2. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by gpvillamil · · Score: 1

      You seem to have it backwards - multiple addresses per contact seems to be on the iPaq, not the Palm Vx.

    3. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by odin53 · · Score: 1

      Hm, maybe you needed pocketpc 2002?

      Also I love the today screen. I have several plug ins and it shows me everything I need to know on one page.

      Aren't there plugins that allow you to do that on the ipaq? I actually don't know for sure, but I've seen it on others' screens.

      I can pick my palm out of the cradle at any time and know that it's synced with my Outlook. On ipaqs I'd have to hit the button on a regular basis.

      My ipaq 1910 picks up the changes immediately after I make them in outlook, no intervention.

    4. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Are you sure you have a Palm Vx?

      I used to :o)

      It was a very clever exercise by NoCoward to point out the stupid moderation going on.

      Check out the original post by myself (marked as Troll) and then his comment on what he did.

      If you extole the PPC, you get moderated as Troll. Swap the words "iPAQ" with "Palm" and vice versa and you get modded +3.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    5. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      You seem to have it backwards - multiple addresses per contact seems to be on the iPaq, not the Palm Vx.

      It is backwards.

      It was a very clever exercise by NoCoward to point out the stupid moderation going on.

      Check out the original post by myself (marked as Troll) and then his comment on what he did.

      If you extole the PPC, you get moderated as Troll. Swap the words "iPAQ" with "Palm" and vice versa and you get modded +3.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    6. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Hm, maybe you needed pocketpc 2002?

      See here for an explanation about why it's so odd.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:Palm PDA vs IPAQ by NoCoward · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was an interesting exercise. It just shows that moderation only works correctly if it is applied justly and without bias.

  113. Is the Palm browser war over? by vinn01 · · Score: 1


    I wonder if this will end the PalmOS browser war? And who will win, Blazer or NetFront (the web browser in Palm OS 5, made by NetFront).

    Any guess how will this hit EudoraWeb or Novarra, www.novarra.com ?

    vb

  114. Which PDA by SlipJig · · Score: 1

    >If you were purchasing a PDA right now,
    >would you choose Palm, Handspring, or
    >avoid them entirely?


    I faced this decision two weeks ago after my Palm died, and ended up buying a Pocket PC (Dell Axim X5 Pro). There were specific features I wanted (like voice memo) that were only available in high-end Palm units, if at all, but are pretty much standard on PPC. The cheapest Palm OS device I could find with voice memo, for example, was $399. For $50 less, my Axim has voice memo, dual expansion slots, a 400MHz CPU, 64MB RAM, 802.11b networking, and a docking cradle. The apps are comparable.

    Say what you want about Windoze for Pocket PC, but the value proposition for me was a no-brainer. I'm really enjoying my new toy ;)

    --
    Read my keyboard review.
  115. niether by celticchrys · · Score: 1

    I have to join the group saying Clié for me. I didn't want a PocketPC, and for the features at a given price(and the screen!) The Palm and Handspring models just didn't cut it. The Pocket PCs have some very nice bells and whistles, but they um, have crashes and stuff, and if I could afford to spen $500, then I could get pretty much equivalent features on a Clié. Could I on a Palm or Handspring? Not quite, because while Palm is trying, those I looked at seem to still be working out the kinks in their design. The Cliés have soem nice designs.

  116. My head is spinning by M3wThr33 · · Score: 1

    I lust over a Kyocera7135.
    The Palm Zire71 comes out, so I get that with the thought of just connecting it to a cell-phone later.
    Then a month later Handspring shows off the Treo600 to private groups.
    THEN A DAY LATER PALM BUYS HANDSPRING.

    I don't know whether to exchange my Zire for a Treo600 eventually or wait one more week and see what ELSE could possibly happen.

  117. Re:Why did Handspring split off in the first place by steveha · · Score: 1

    I still have and use my Visor Deluxe daily, although the screen's starting to go and it'll have to be replaced soon.

    So get yourself a Visor Neo to replace it. If you check ebay, you will find you can get a Visor Deluxe for about $30, and a Visor Neo for probably $50 to $70 or so. If you really like it, get another.

    I used the heck out of my Visor Deluxes. I bought a Visor Neo and used it for a while. But when I had a chance to get a Palm Tungsten T for a low price on eBay, I got it and I love it now. Compact, sturdy, and a great screen. And I love the speed.

    Initially I was worried about battery life. You just have to make sure to plunk it in its cradle every few days to recharge it; it's not as big a deal as I was worried about.

    If you do get a Tungsten T, be sure to get a good case to protect it. I have an E&B Slipper case and I love it.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  118. liquidation? by thinkman808 · · Score: 1

    Looking to liquidate any of those Hansprings?

    1. Re:liquidation? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      They handed them out to employees, so now just about everybody has a Visor with the company or product name silk-screened on it...

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  119. Treo 600 by imuffin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Details on the new Treo - the Treo 600 - are starting to leak out, and it looks like a pretty major improvement. The photo from the merger even gave us a decent Hi-res photo of the new Treo. I think it looks pretty cool, but the obvious lacking feature is a higher-resolution screen. I wonder if the coolness factor of the Treo 600 helped encourage Palm to make the merger?

  120. Actually... by t0ny · · Score: 0
    Actually, Palm has a really weird business formula-

    1) Create successful product (3com's Palm Pilot)

    2) Spin off successful, money making product to its own company (Palm Inc). Very effective way for making sure the parent company doesnt make any of that evil money.

    3) Royally screw up company, but try and spin off any successful ideas (like PalmOS) into its own company.

    4) Buy one of your competitors, because they make a better product than you. We all know that aquiring other companies is a sure way to be successful!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  121. REX was the best I've used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past few years I have been a Pilot user, Psion user and a REX Pro user. Both the Piot and Psion have long since died, but I keep going back to the REX. It's tiny, batteries last for months, synchs with Outlook. No frilly apps. Too bad Intel bought the line and killed it. If you don't carry your PDA everywhere what good is it? Most of them are just too klunky for me.

  122. Before long they'll be using the Chewbacca defense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well then you guys are fucking idiots then. Don't come here crying because your company doesn't have one business brain amongst you. You took a big risk on some fringe technology that hadn't, by and stretch of the imagination, cememented a place in the IT world, and got burnt. Ce la vie.

  123. I use mine every day by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Before I got a PDA, I had buddies of mine telling me for a couple years, get one, you need one. I would just say yeah right, I don't need bla bla bla. Well, then one day about 3 years ago, they dropped the price on the Handspring Visor Deluxe and I said, ok, I'll buy one, and if I don't like it, I'll get rid of it on ebay. About a month after I got it, you would need a gun to pry it out of my hands. Now I have a Dell Axim X5 and I'd rather die than live without it. What do I use it for? Everything! Keeping track of appointment times, birthdays, jot quick notes, service calls (I'm a field tech), my inventory. Games? NONE, I use it for business, not as a glorified game boy. I even have a detailed city map in case on a rare occasion that I get a call on a street that I don't remember where it is. And this map you don't have to struggle with to refold :)

  124. A good fit by VikingBrad · · Score: 1
    This is a good fit.

    Handspring for a while now has been exclusively focused on the Treo line of Smart Phones. The Visor line has long since finished production.

    The first generation Treos came out last year, the second generation Treo 600 is due out in the American fall.

    Handspring also has made deals with carriers such as Sprint, T-mobile and others to carry their handsets. Something that Palm hasn't done and would have a long way to catch up.

    Palm's only mobile/cell phone capable model the Tungsten W can't even take a phone call without plugging in a headset, what a blockhead design!

    This allows Palm to have a strong products for the smartphone area to compete with MS SmartPhone's and Sony Ericsson's models.

    Check out new specs on 2nd generation Treo on Treocentral

    Cheers

    VikingBrad

  125. Which one to buy? by dan_bethe · · Score: 1
    If you were purchasing a PDA right now, would you choose Palm, Handspring, or avoid them entirely?
    I'm awaiting the rebirth of the Newton, you insensitive clod!
    1. Re:Which one to buy? by MSTCrow5429 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a Newton, but would probably purchase one if Apple every started making them again to replace my venerable Palm Vx.

      --
      Slashdot: Playing Favorites Since 1997
    2. Re:Which one to buy? by youknowit · · Score: 0

      i probably wouldn't buy either. it seems palm is buying handspring in effort to stimulate business growth. they had the first movers advantage when handhelds first came out, but competitors (handspring), soon copied and improved on palm's technology. the new tablet pc from gateway (i believe) seems pretty cool. if you're in to the all tools in one function, maybe check out the PDA phone.

  126. What where these springboards? by JBoelke · · Score: 1

    Did you make any? What did they do? If I like it I might buy it.

    1. Re:What where these springboards? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      I can't say much except to say it might possibly have been a medical device for people who can't eat a lot of sugar and who might be interested in keeping tabs on their health. They never received official government approval (we withdrew our application after the word was out) so I couldn't give one away even if I had any to give away.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  127. Kinda sad really by synclayre · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at buying a Visor for the last few months since I was diagnosed with Diabetes, there's a rather nifty use of the Springboard technology in the product sold by www.freestyletracker.com

    Anyone that's super dependent on their tester / insulin but generally on the go might want to look at this, I cant see the technology being sustained after the merger so Ill probably be picking one up as soon as I can scrape the money together.

  128. General Celphone blues.... by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the info - I'm personally not in the market (I've already got a hi-res(Handera) PDA I'm pretty happy with and don't forsee any great need for a celphone at the moment), but I'm sure there are others looking.

    Personally, I'd like to see a dumb, dumb, dumb, cheap celphone (Maybe even just a keypad and a 'low battery' LED, no screen, or maybe just a one line LCD.) that recieves/transmits well, is relatively small/light, and has BT enabled. That way, I can do the complicated stuff on the touch-sensitive PDA and just talk on the phone.

  129. I didn't say... by kikta · · Score: 1

    ...that Springboard was "the result of massave[sic] R&D". I said that they were heavily invested in it. Those are two totally different things. I was referring to their offerings of Springboard modules and the like. However, I wasn't aware when I wrote it that Handspring is discontinuing Springboard, so it matters little anyway.

    I have a Zaurus and love it, so this really isn't of much concern to me. Integrating phones and PDA's is also pretty stupid, IMHO, so there's also little reason for me to care in the future. This is how I justify my ignorace of the deeper details of the Handspring world. ;-)

  130. Which came first, the chicken or the egg? by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    CF seems to be the industry standard since Handspring kept their springboard slot all to themselves.

    Propriatary hardware is Bad, sure enough, but there's probably other reasons why CF is still here and Springboards are gone...

    Maybe the huge number of CF-using digital cameras that provide a large base of users to keep price low...

    The fact that you can use a CF peripheral (With adapter) in both your PDA and Laptop is handy... The fact that CF is (to some degree) pin-compatable with PC-Card slots makes the adaptor dirt cheap, too.

    But the big reason is probably how old CF is - the Compact Flash association was founded in 1995, about the time USR aquired Palm, and (IIRC) four years before Hanspring was even formed.

  131. Palm are only after the Treo? by Henry_Doors · · Score: 1

    Handspring have been running down their PDA business for a while and concentrating on the Treo phone/pda. I suspect that is what Palm are after as I don't think they have realy broken into that market yet. Personnally I have a Handspring (Neo) which I'm happy with but even before this news I thought my next upgrade wouldn't be a Handspring as they haven't updated their PDA range for a while. Still pretty good business for the founders, set up one business, Palm make it successful then sell it. Then set up another business Handspring doing the same thing then sell it to the same people.

    --
    "I deny nothing, but doubt everything." Lord Byron
  132. That is the option of lazy managers and CEOs by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The same ones that after the company goes into read badly get big payouts after their miserable failure to provide leadership and vision.

    Or they get even more if they reduce production costs. Did they do that by streamlining their processes and internal bureaucratic procedures? No, they opened a spreadsheet with all the company's employees, sorted it out by salary and years of experience and, once their buddies are excluded, marked the names of workers that came on top.

    I wold agree that this is a healthy exercise if all of the sudden there was less work, but I have seen far too many times that the work that was done by 4 is now done by 2, and actually the intrincacies of integrating different IT infrastructures means an additional workload that would be better served by, yes, you guessed it, 4 people.

    And then everybody asks why IT projects are always over budget and late. Well, here is a good reason why.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  133. You forgot a very important one. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The social responsibility of a company.

    I know the concept is alien to USians, but given the impact companies actions have, a successful company should not have share value as its sole measurement of achievement.

    Actually it used to be like that, shareholders invested with the hope that profits would be shared with them in the form of dividends which hopefully would be higer than having the money in the bank. It is only with the sophistication of the financial especulative industry that gambling wich company would do best became an acceptable way to fianance a compny.

    The model is flawed, it is like a company and investors going to a casino to arrange how finaincing is arranged.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  134. Not the same. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The original poster was talking about the official ROM, not OZ.

    It is very commendable what the OZ guys are doing, but from the applications and usability point of view I also prefer the offical ROM.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  135. It may not be a troll.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    .... but is statistically unrepresentative.

    I have a Palm III that I bought some time ago (I think your N is almost 5) and I had to retire it only because I got a Palm IIIc two years ago. This one is soon to be retired as soon as my Zaurus is configured with all the stuff I want to have.

    So far I like the Wirless capability, but if I need to I can charge (or put new batteries) in either of my old machines and be ready to go (they will be snapped soon in Ebay I am sure).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  136. insulin level monitor? by JBoelke · · Score: 1

    Considering the number of Americans who suffer from obesity which places them at a higher risk for diabetes this would of been an excellent feature. I wonder if this product could be adapted to be used in the current generation of hand-helds?

    1. Re: insulin level monitor? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      The problem is there simply isn't room inside most handhelds. You can make an external device that connects via an expansion port, but most new PDAs use the SecureDigital or MMC cards that are wafer thin and would snap off with the slightest amount of pressure.

      It is possible however to use infrared to transmit data from a device to most current handhelds, which appears to be the direction the industry is heading.

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  137. Re:Why?: it's the phone, ring ring .. by CinqDemi · · Score: 1

    Because Handspring are far more advanced in the phone side of the pdas. In fact, they had decided to drop the pda-only series last year to concentrate exclusively on the cellphone/pda combos. This is harder work than meets the eyes because to be successful you have to negotiate all the different phone carriers limitations and differences. But it is the one that will grow. Who really wants to look up phone nos in the pdas to enter them in the cell phone?

    Palm arent as focused, are thinking more of extending pdas as Tablets. On top of that, Handspring has done v. good work in the Palm OS; I recall some of the advanced (at the time) Palm OS's versions were due to Handspring's mods being officially entered in the Palm OS.

    All in all a good combo company.

    ( Disclaimer: I have owned 3 Palms to m500, bought -and recently sold at large profit Handspring stock - )

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---