Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Grow Decaffeinated Coffee Plants

An anonymous reader writes "According to a CBC News story, researchers have genetically modified coffee seedlings to produce up to 70 per cent less caffeine." The Japanese researchers quoted in the article say "..demand for decaffeinated coffee is growing worldwide. Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people", and so "..used a tool called RNA interference to genetically engineer the one-year-old plants." Seems like these boffins may be competing against the University Of Hawaii researchers we mentioned last year to take away your buzz.

427 comments

  1. Whats the point? by benna · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean really, if it can't help me stay up all night coding whats the point?

    --
    "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Whats the point? by MonkeyBoyUk · · Score: 1

      To make some coffee company more mega bucks and get another round of funding for the researchers...

    2. Re:Whats the point? by intermodal · · Score: 4, Funny

      i'll bet the researchers drink real coffee.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    3. Re:Whats the point? by jkrise · · Score: 4, Funny

      " if it can't help me stay up all night ..."

      Actually caffeine has been known to cause erectile dysfunction, or simply put; "Staying Up Problem". If you really want to stay up all night (not coding!), then don't touch caffeine!

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    4. Re:Whats the point? by Yusaku+Godai · · Score: 3, Funny

      Gah, so that explains it. My schedule was often such that I had to stay up more than 24 hours to get much time with my girlfriend, and thus much caffeine was consumed before seeing her. But those nights tended not to be as...um..."active"..as normal nights. Thanks for the tip!

    5. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we could create some de-coffeeinated caffeine plants?

    6. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not like /.ers have much of that to worry about...

    7. Re:Whats the point? by danimrich · · Score: 1

      If it does not contain any caffeine, why should we drink it then?

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    8. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only for certain people.

      I know plently (including myself) that pound away the caffeine and have no problem "Staying Up".

    9. Re:Whats the point? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 0

      I agree. Back in college, we tried putting a spoonful of instant coffee in a cup of brewed coffee. The taste was horrible, but it did provide that extra caffeine kick! No-Doze crushed and mixed in with diet coke was also attempted, but the resulting chemical reaction caused the coke to fiz up all over the place.

    10. Re:Whats the point? by drdale · · Score: 4, Funny

      Fortunately, just this morning I received an e-mail offering me a product to help relieve that very problem. Actually, I received 27 of them.

      --
      This post is dedicated to all of those /.ers who do not dedicate their posts to themselves.
    11. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG!!! Mod Parent Up +10000 Uncvntrollable Hilarity. Please sir, log inand share you comic genius with us more. We must know who you are! I spewe diahrea with every uncontrollable laugh!

    12. Re:Whats the point? by Greedo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on, Slashdot. Decaffinated coffee plants? That is neither news for nerds or stuff that matters!

      Now, if they had genetically engineered a Mountain Dew tree ...

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    13. Re:Whats the point? by MrFriday · · Score: 1

      I think this is a certainty.

    14. Re:Whats the point? by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny
      Actually caffeine has been known to cause erectile dysfunction, or simply put; "Staying Up Problem".

      And this is a problem for the typical Slashdotter because...?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    15. Re:Whats the point? by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

      What would the typical ./ reader do with all his pr0n if he had this problem?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    16. Re:Whats the point? by a1englishman · · Score: 1

      Not all of us drink coffee for the buzz. I drink coffee for the taste (with some milk and sugar). I have particular beans that I enjoy more than others (Kenyan, for example). I don't nesecarily require a fully caffinated coffee to enjoy this. If you're drinking coffee for the buzz, I don't see that you can really be enjoying it. It's more of a macho thing.

    17. Re:Whats the point? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I drink coffee for the taste (with some milk and sugar).

      Isn't this a contradiction? Black without is where it's at if you're really interested in the flavor of the coffee.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    18. Re:Whats the point? by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      You drink it because it tastes good, and it has the fortunate side effect of giving you a buzz.

      Just because you're drinking it to stay awake doesn't mean you can't drink it slowly.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    19. Re:Whats the point? by fubar1971 · · Score: 1

      Sure this story is /. worthy. What an abuse of genitic engineering!!! I always supported the genetic engineering cause, and people would scream, "ARE YOU NUTS, YOU CAN't TRUST PEOPLE TO NOT ABUSE SUCH POWERS!". Now it seems they were right!!! What's next, nictonie free tobacco!! Where will it end!!!!

    20. Re:Whats the point? by coke_dite · · Score: 1

      A bunch of my Engineering student roomies in Uni used to make two drinks that I could never stomach. One was called a Kick-start - it consisted of Jolt Cola with Instant coffee powder added it. The other was called a Jumper Cable - slightly less daytime-friendly as it consisted of Jack Daniels with Jolt Cola. Nasty stuff, but it sure got them through some gruesome cram sessions (record was clocked at 78 hours - who knows how much their brains were even functioning, let alone retaining, by that point)

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
    21. Re:Whats the point? by jakobk · · Score: 1

      Actually, it removes the buzz.

    22. Re:Whats the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I mean really, if it can't help me stay up all night coding whats the point?

      Since it has no caffeine, shouldn't they have to call it just 'fee?

    23. Re:Whats the point? by DrunkEvilPenguin · · Score: 0

      I'll be impressed when they can go the other way. Caffeine for all! :)

    24. Re:Whats the point? by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      What's next, nictonie free tobacco

      Funny you should mention that

    25. Re:Whats the point? by feldmark · · Score: 1


      Isn't this a contradiction? Black without is where it's at if you're really interested in the flavor of the coffee.

      Actually, fats enhance flavor. One reason we like high fat foods. So although I agree about the sugar related component of this comment, try black coffee with real cream, i.e. lots of fat, rather than a silly cream-like substance or milk. Cream dilutes the flavor much less than milk, and brings out more real coffee flavor, IMHO.

    26. Re:Whats the point? by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually caffeine has been known to cause erectile dysfunction, or simply put; "Staying Up Problem". If you really want to stay up all night (not coding!), then don't touch caffeine!

      Bah. This effect only lasts during the actual caffeine buzz (approx. 5 hours after you drink the coffee). At least that's been my experience.

      It's just hard to concentrate on stuff like that when you keep thinking about the code you're going to write once you're finished.

  2. Decaffeinated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about they get working on super-caffeinated coffee? And we can call it Coffee 2. Then the regular caffeinated version of coffee can be renamed to Coffee 2. But the super-caffeinated version will be Coffee 2 Hi-Caffeine and the regular-caffeinated version will be Coffee 2 Full-Caffeine.

    1. Re:Decaffeinated? by benna · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have you been drinking too much coffee?

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Decaffeinated? by tomakaan · · Score: 5, Funny

      It could be called Coffee 2, even if it is really coffee 1.1 in disguise.

    3. Re:Decaffeinated? by benna · · Score: 4, Funny

      or maybe it could be called coffee millennium edition even though its really just an update.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    4. Re:Decaffeinated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we could call it linux, but then that would solve all the other names problems.

    5. Re:Decaffeinated? by benna · · Score: 4, Funny

      We could incorperate linux kernel code in the genome sequence but we may pick the wrong lines and get sued by SCO.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    6. Re:Decaffeinated? by pacc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, this story left me wanting.
      Thank god for instant espresso which allows you to put that extra spoonful in your normal cup...

    7. Re:Decaffeinated? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      Fu^H^H Stuff that, after drinking it your ears only hear in mono until the third patch, and that leaves your fly undone!

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    8. Re:Decaffeinated? by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank god for instant espresso which allows you to put that extra spoonful in your normal cup...

      C-C-Cup?CupsareforwussesMAN!!Nnnnrgh!!*twitch* ForarealHITjusteatitwithaspoonstraightOUTofthejar! !!*twitch*

    9. Re:Decaffeinated? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      We could incorperate linux kernel code in the genome sequence but we may pick the wrong lines and get sued by SCO.

      Didn't you hear? SCO is suing God for patent infringement on the original caffeinated version. They've already tracked Him down and expect Him to pay real soon. You'd be amazed where He was found, says a SCO spokesman, but they won't provide details because...well, no details. Once God caves in, they plan to push other infringement suits; Nestle, Starbucks, and that terrorist funded coffee chain with a moose as it's logo were mentioned.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    10. Re:Decaffeinated? by Nick+Harkin · · Score: 1

      Ah, genius... welcome to my friends list.

    11. Re:Decaffeinated? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 0

      Better yet, call it pheonix, then change it to firebird.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    12. Re:Decaffeinated? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...in your normal cup ? I just eat it outright.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    13. Re:Decaffeinated? by Zenjive · · Score: 1

      Go check out Gene Catlow. It's a web comic, go to the beginning in the archives. Coffee that gives you psychic powers, hehe.

      --


      A vacuum is a hell of a lot better than some of the stuff that nature replaces it with. - Tennessee Williams
    14. Re:Decaffeinated? by below_the_sea · · Score: 1

      I would like to ask you that very same question.

    15. Re:Decaffeinated? by macthulhu · · Score: 1

      Man, we could drag this out all day... Colored coffee could be called iCoffee, coffee that spills all over the place when you least expect it would be Coffee 95/98... Open Source Coffee would be a bag of beans and a separate cup of water with your choice of several heating elements and grinders... A drink carrier with multiple cups becomes a Beowulf cluster... Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk. Come to think of it, maybe decaf would be a good idea...

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

    16. Re:Decaffeinated? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Why not just pop a couple of these with your morning brew?

      What's scary is I ordered three bottles of these a few months ago becuase there was a quantity discount. =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    17. Re:Decaffeinated? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Caffiene is actually relatively easy to synthesise. It shouldn't be too hard to simply add it to regular coffee.

    18. Re:Decaffeinated? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      How about they get working on super-caffeinated coffee?

      Even better -- they should start working on genetically engineering ephedrine into coffee... Now that would kick some ass... =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    19. Re:Decaffeinated? by Mesozoic44 · · Score: 1
      Well - what about 'recaf' - decaffeinated coffee where one adds caffein tablets to restore the natural beauty of coffee? I guess this would be like the naturally carbonated water (Perrier?) where they remove the natural carbonation and then restore it so that they are all the same.

      It's a slippery slope - first you modify the coffee - then someone owns the idea of modifying coffee - then 'all your coffee belongs to us'. Be careful what you wish for.

    20. Re:Decaffeinated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! Bwah hah hah!

    21. Re:Decaffeinated? by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      chocolate covered coffee beans... hmmmm

      I especially enjoy a nice bitter chocolate with a dark roasted bean. That stuff is so dark I have to drink a glass of water just to survive the experience! something about washing the pallete?)

      Double whammy. Too bad the caffein causes my heart to fibrulate.

    22. Re:Decaffeinated? by kavau · · Score: 2, Funny
      But the super-caffeinated version will be Coffee 2 Hi-Caffeine and the regular-caffeinated version will be Coffee 2 Full-Caffeine.

      Great idea! And then we rename the normal-sized cups to "tall", and the large cups to "grande"! Oh, wait... never mind.

    23. Re:Decaffeinated? by blahtree · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha! My roomate used to eat that stuff mixed with yogurt. It was the only way his stomach could handle the insane quantities that he shoveled down during exam time!

    24. Re:Decaffeinated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming soon: C2EE (Coffee 2, Enterprise Edition)

  3. Hmmm... by tomakaan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't know about you, but the only reason I ever even come close to touching coffee is for the caffeine. There are better beverages without caffeine

    1. Re:Hmmm... by kiwi_james · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I like coffee for the taste, the caffeine is also an added reward.

      Some people want to have de-caf for health reasons. Fine...no problem there, to each his own. But these guys are hoping on to tap into this market with Genetically Modified coffee!

      In my experience the people who go for the healthy alternative also want their food to be GM free. Also a lot of restaurants/cafes promote themselves as being GM free.

      I think they may have sliced off a chunk of their potential sales market.

      Oh well, not my problem...time for an espresso.

    2. Re:Hmmm... by petman · · Score: 1

      It might be peer pressure. You know, during coffee break, everybody's drinking coffee. But you don't want to be the only one without a cup in your hand, even though you don't like the caffeine. So you get yourself a cup of decaf. Not because you want it, but because everybody's doing it.

    3. Re:Hmmm... by Pig+Bodine · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't know about you, but the only reason I ever even come close to touching coffee is for the caffeine. There are better beverages without caffeine

      Of course there caffeine-free beverages that are better than coffee. But all of those contain alcohol and some people occasionally want to drink something that is both alcohol AND caffeine free.

      I'm not sure why. People can be weird sometimes.

    4. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly. Its like MacDonalds doing a veggieburger. Only the dullest of vegetarians are going to go anywhere near a MacDonalds.

    5. Re:Hmmm... by Kirth · · Score: 3, Funny
      Yeah, decoffeinated coffee is for idiots. Who on slashdot should need such bullshit? We want more coffeine, not less! Also soon on Slashdot: Beer without alcohol, butter without fat...

      I mean, who is fucked up enough to want such products? Whats the next glorious "light"-idea? Castrated husbands?
      --

      --
      "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
    6. Re:Hmmm... by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Funny

      My GOD man, have they any decency? the infadels!! someone must alert Mr. GWB that these people exist.

    7. Re:Hmmm... by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      There are better beverages without caffeine

      Not as far as I'm concerned - I can't drink caffeine (sensitised myself to it something shocking about 5 years ago, and drinking it now just makes me feel sick). But I love coffee. Good coffee, that is - I wouldn't touch instant with 10 foot pole ... A good cup of coffee from my stove-top percolator is pure heaven.

      If you really hate the taste of coffee, but just drink it because you like the hit of caffeine ... !! What a waste of money!! Why not just buy Jolt?? It's a lot cheaper.

      (You might be interested to know that even without genetic engineering, chemically decaf coffee beans taste *identical* to normal ones. The only difference is ... you guessed it ... no caffeine hit)

    8. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, you know, all the cool kids drink coffee, and sooner or later you get tired of being picked on and want to be cool too.

      Man, I remember my first hit.. Whooooo...

    9. Re:Hmmm... by uncoveror · · Score: 1
      There is a lot more Frankenfood than decaf coffee plants. There are Treemeat, Chick'N, and Egg Bushes.

      A side-effect of all this tinkering has been flesh-eating termites!

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    10. Re:Hmmm... by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Whats the next glorious "light"-idea? Castrated husbands?

      Don't give them any ideas.

    11. Re:Hmmm... by Sheriff+Fatman · · Score: 1
      "If you really hate the taste of coffee, but just drink it because you like the hit of caffeine ... !! What a waste of money!! Why not just buy Jolt?? It's a lot cheaper."

      Ok - I suspect this may be one of those weird transatlantic cultural differences, but here in the UK, almost everyone makes their own tea and coffee. (as in boils the water, etc., rather than buying it from Starbucks) You're almost guaranteed to find a kettle in every home and office, so hot water is basically free, and a pack of good filter coffee granules is about five pounds. I'd reckon on getting at least twenty or thirty cups out of a bag of coffee. That works out at less than 25 pence a cup. And that's for good filter coffee. Instant is a lot cheaper - my household goes through a £5 jar in a month, and that's 3 people drinking about 10 cups a week, each - less than 5p a cup if you drink it black without sugar. By contrast, a can of Coke or equivalent is about 60p, making coffee by far the cheapest way of getting your daily caffeine kick. (Jolt is a bad comparison since in the UK it's imported and therefore expensive)

      Yeah, a Starbucks triple grande latte mocha Alpacino with chocolate sprinkles costs more than a can of Coke - but that's not paying for caffeine, that's paying for convenience and branding and gimmicks.

      --
      -- Open Source: It's mad, but you don't have to work here to help.
    12. Re:Hmmm... by palutke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Luckily, all my coworkers smoke crack instead of drinking coffee on their breaks, so there's no risk of me becoming a caffiene addict.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    13. Re:Hmmm... by Efreet · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'd drink it. If I'm not up late working I try not to have more than two caffinated drinks a day, and I like to support genetic engineering.

      --
      This sig wasn't worth reading, was it.
    14. Re:Hmmm... by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      do vasectomies count?

    15. Re:Hmmm... by jmpvm · · Score: 1
      - but that's not paying for caffeine, that's paying for convenience and branding and gimmicks.


      Yup. That's the American way. Laziness transcends practicality.
    16. Re:Hmmm... by shellbeach · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm Australian, not American. But I must admit I associated drinking coffee with buying it at a cafe, despite the fact that I make wonderful coffee every day at home with a stove-top pot. Don't know about the UK, but here there's a big "cafe culture" - meeting friends for coffee is a very common thing.

      That said, you can't really compare prices to a can of coke - a better comparison would be to a 1.25L bottle (which is about the same price in Australia as a can, and gives you 5 drinks of 250ml) ... Instant is still cheaper, but not by that much, and it's probably on par with decent ground coffee.

      So point taken about the price, but it still seems really weird to drink something you don't like the taste of, simply because it's got a chemical in it that makes your body shake and slows your brain down!

      (Incidentally, I'd never go near Starbucks - there's much, much better coffee available here than that rubbish!)

    17. Re:Hmmm... by Gleng · · Score: 1
      all my coworkers smoke crack instead of drinking coffee

      Do you work for SCO?

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
  4. fifififinally. by michaelhood · · Score: 5, Funny

    i rerereally cococould uuuuse thththis stufffff.

  5. decaffinated coffee... by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    about as popular as dry water.

    Or alcohol-free beer.

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
    1. Re:decaffinated coffee... by the+uNF+cola · · Score: 1

      For some of us, even standard decaf has a bit too much caffine. Having had a near 0% caffine intake for near a year now, the slightest bit of caffine from anything throws me off.... so when decaf turns to no caffine instead of jus a little... I'll be happy.

      You insensitive clod :)

      --

      --
      "I'm not bright. Big words confuse me. But Wanda loves me and that should be enough for you." - Cosmo

    2. Re:decaffinated coffee... by cshark · · Score: 1

      I could see compulsive coffee drinkers like myself using something like this to get that caffiene tolerence back down to normal levels. And a generically decafinated coffee means that it should still taste like normal coffee.

      Unlike current decaf.

      It also simplifies the (expensive)process of decaffinating coffee over all, which means that the cofee companies will have less overhead, and in turn lower prices. It's the economic circle of life.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    3. Re:decaffinated coffee... by GoldMace · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to have 0% caffeine intake?

      Seriously, if you like coffee why give up caffeine. That's like a wine connoisseur quitting drinking. It doesn't make any sense.

  6. very bad idea by mirko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people

    I don't think this is a good idea to get "sensitive people" used to the taste of stuff which is not good for them.

    This is like Coke Light : though it has no sugar inside it still tastes exageratedly sweet and this would be a better idea to get the "users" curious about differently tasted products.

    I am afraid, at the end of the story, everything will taste the same and recipe will consist of posologies. :/

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
    1. Re:very bad idea by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I actually like the taste of coffee. As I don't drink it too often now since my wife isn't able to drink it. Caffine is bad for her. Maybe something like this would be a good thing as she like coffee also.

      But, nah, coffee is bad. Why is coffee bad?

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    2. Re:very bad idea by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I ran some Coke Light through a HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) setup a couple of weeks ago, and it had 1.6 times as much caffienne as regular Coke.

    3. Re:very bad idea by mirko · · Score: 1

      You know, I like fresh Lobster but... it's not that common to get some in Switzerland...
      So, I just wait and only dring a little of the genuine thing from time to time...
      And meanwhile, I just experiment other things hoping I'll like these as much as lobster...

      Better the real thing than a substitute

      Another post was about the differences between
      Arabica and Robusta, they claim Arabica is the real thing and Robusta, which is stronger is a disease-proof copy.

      Also, Espresso is supposed to be stronger-tasted but less-caffeined...

      Do the math : a small Arabica Espresso should do it from time to time.

      Bye
      PS: about your sig, the stupid thing is that Merovingian keeps saying the same insult, which makes he looks like a moron.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    4. Re:very bad idea by FroMan · · Score: 1

      You know, I like fresh Lobster but... it's not that common to get some in Switzerland...
      So, I just wait and only dring a little of the genuine thing from time to time...
      And meanwhile, I just experiment other things hoping I'll like these as much as lobster...


      My favorite vacation was on my honeymoon in Bar Harbor, Maine. I still enjoy most of my other vacations.

      My favorite cheesecake is chocolate raspberry. I still like my wife's pumpkin cheesecake.

      Just because I have a favorite, does not mean that I cannot enjoy substitutes.

      Anyways, also about my sig. My wife and I were chatting after seeing someone else having the actual quote from the movie about how silly it was. So, I changed my sig to kind of mock the follower/sheep nature of that fellow. Taking a jab at French people is amusing as they seem to be all high and mighty holier than though kind (as a general rule and from experience when visiting France).

      You see, my sig is a subtle change to the quite, enough to miss if you don't read it right. At first it was too subtle as folks thought I simpley mistyped it as there were a half dozen replies saying I typed it wrong. Well, at that point I decided to put in the "[sic]" and while the "You typed it wrong!" posts slowed down, some still don't get it that it was intentional.

      Anyways, my wife suggested a less subtle one, and I wish I could have taken credit for it, but she is the master mind.

      "I like swearing in german, its like wiping your ass with sandpaper."

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    5. Re:very bad idea by mirko · · Score: 1

      Taking a jab at French people is amusing as they seem to be all high and mighty holier than though kind (as a general rule and from experience when visiting France).

      You're almost right here, actually they are this and its opposite at once (as a gerneral rule from experience when being french - still expat in Switzerland, so French and Swiss at the same time :-)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  7. What next... by Justatad · · Score: 4, Funny

    opiate free poppy plantations?

    1. Re:What next... by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      Since we already have Ultralight cigarettes and stuff, shouldnt be far fetched.Easy way to cure physological addiction, give him a cigarette with no nicotine. Hemp actually an be used to make parts and stuff (I think) to make cars (Ford tried a model long time ago) so maybe there is a reason for Hemp to be opiate free.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    2. Re:What next... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK..you're retarded, there are no opiates in MariJane. Go smoke a J then some red-rock - the difference will be quite obvious :)

      And they did already dev low-THC cannabis, for fiber/oils/etc. And are working on creating NO THC strain (dirty bastards)
      It really is the greatest plant ever : Oils (for fuel, lotions, lubricants, etc) Fiber (for rope, clothes, bags, nutrition), Religious uses, Recreational Uses, Medical Uses (cancer, pain mgmt, stomach/digestion problem)...
      I'll stop but you get the idea.

      Criminalzing a NATURAL plant is the dumbest thing govt's have done.So much could be gained (yes, even taxes for you bureaucrats)

      Legalize!

  8. Dilbert by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Today's Dilbert seems apropos.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    1. Re:Dilbert by Surak · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kinda makes you wonder if either A) Scott Adams knew about this already or B) Scott Adams reads Slashdot...

    2. Re:Dilbert by ThatWeasel · · Score: 1

      Hummm... I would have thought Wally would have been the first one to "die" if the coffee was switched to Decaf. Eh... Go Wally for surviving. Wooo!

      --

      TW
      Television is dead. Long live That Weasel Television

    3. Re:Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, it was on the regular news yesterday - plenty of time to draw a comic I guess.

    4. Re:Dilbert by Eccles · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...or (C) Scott Adams was the anonymous reader who submitted the story.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    5. Re:Dilbert by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1


      What a fun slashdot interview that would be!

      Scott? Taco? How about it???

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    6. Re:Dilbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syndicated comics usually have well over a weeks lead time. Good reason to join the university newspaper, you get to read the comics early.

  9. Beer... by danormsby · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And I thought alcohol free beer was bad enough.

    Isn't the caffeine in the coffee the point of coffee?

    --
    Omnis amans amens
    1. Re:Beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people want decaffeinated coffee for the horrible taste. Just like they want alcohol-free beer for the extra carbs and fat when a pork chop just isn't enough.

    2. Re:Beer... by cap'n+foolsy · · Score: 1

      believe it or not, some people actually like the taste of good coffee... not the buzz that comes when you slurp down 4 or 5 cups of it. the jittery feeling you get when you've had too much is just... unpleasant. sure, you may be able to keep coding all night, but at what expense? your health?

      --
      It might look like I'm standing motionless, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away
    3. Re:Beer... by myster0n · · Score: 1

      but at what expense? your health?

      Now that is, in comparison, a small price to pay.
      --
      Nobody believes the official spokesman, but everybody trusts an unidentified source. -- Ron Nesen
    4. Re:Beer... by Aussie · · Score: 1

      Caffeine is part of the flavour of coffee, it isn't
      coffee without the caffeine.

    5. Re:Beer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, last time I ate a Vivarin and a NoDoz I didn't notice that wounderful flavour...

  10. Nooo! by Noryungi · · Score: 4, Funny

    *Jaw drops open*

    This is blasphemy!! This, this, this... This is an outrage! Oh, the humanity!

    It's time to stop this nonsense once and for all! Coders, Admins, hackers, and yes, even Microsoft employees, virus writers and marketdroids, repeat after me:

    No to GMO! We want Real Coffee!

    I mean, Decaf' Coffee? If God wanted us to drink this, he would not have invented Starbucks!

    Oh, wait... I am a tea drinker...

    Err... Well, never mind me. Carry on... ;-)

    --
    The right to offend is far more important than the right not to be offended. (Rowan Atkinson)
    1. Re:Nooo! by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      "Yes to GMO, we want EXTRA caffine coffee !"

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    2. Re:Nooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If God wanted us to drink this, he would not have invented Starbucks!

      Starbucks is the devil's work!

    3. Re:Nooo! by dheltzel · · Score: 1
      No to GMO! We want Real Coffee!

      Oh, wait... I am a tea drinker...

      I'm a tea drinker too, but we must stand with our caffeinated brethren (and cistern). First, they start with the coffee drinkers, but we could be next. What if they GM the tea plant to reduce the caffeine. It would probably taste like those wimpy "herbal" teas.

      Let's make a stand before it's too late!!

    4. Re:Nooo! by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Oh, wait... I am a tea drinker...

      Just stay where you are. We will be with you shortly. Don't try to escape. It will only make things more difficult.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  11. genetic modification. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Until reading this I was fairly neutral about the GM issue.

    On one hand I thought greenpeace were a load of insane hippies who are in need of a damn good kicking, but I was also suspicious of the motives of the biotech companies. I was, however, prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

    Now I know. Greenpeace are right! Those bastards mean to destroy us all, and I have proof!!!

    1. Re:genetic modification. by myLobster · · Score: 1


      Farmer grows his crop
      Somewhere high in the mountains
      Barely earns a bean

      --

      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
  12. Dangers of GM food by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people

    So we must protect the fools who, in spite of the symptoms, insist on drinking coffee. Not only do we have to do that, but we'll just have to do it by letting loose modifed genomes with no idea of how this will change the ecosystem?

    GM food has not been proved safe in long term cultivation and it will not help to relieve hunger in 3rd world countries. Hunger is a political problem, not an agricultural problem. The production capacity of the Earth would feed the current and future population very well if the distribution of food were done fairly.

    1. Re:Dangers of GM food by m1chael · · Score: 0

      i dont like your attitude..
      [goes to create genetically modified humans without said attitude]

      --
      I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
    2. Re:Dangers of GM food by countvlad · · Score: 1

      Uh, those are the same fools who can drink, get this, decaffeinated coffee. I'm pretty sure the idea is to cut out the "decaffeinizing" step in production, which can negatively impact the flavor (as well as drive up costs). You make it sound like they're planning on replacing current crops with this decaffeinated stuff.

      The rest of your post is asinine. You're probably more likely to see a random mutation "change the ecosystem" than flipping off some gene that controls wether a plant produces caffeine or not.

    3. Re:Dangers of GM food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a caffeine triggered super-ventricular tachicardia, and if coffee were the only issue, I would agree with you.

      But it isn't, and living without tea or chocolate is a hard thing to ask. So I drink tea (but only If I make it myself from decaf tea bags), and eat carefully rationed quantities of chocolate.

      I'm not very enthusiastic about GM, but a decaf cocoa bean would be a great thing!

    4. Re:Dangers of GM food by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      GM food has not been proved safe in long term cultivation and it will not help to relieve hunger in 3rd world countries

      I don't know about you, but regular coffee works pretty well for me as an appetite suppressant :-)

      OK, so I'm an insensitive clod... :-)

    5. Re:Dangers of GM food by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Or, the production capacity of the Earth would feed the current and future population well if governments of developing nations were anti-free-market and/or corrupt.

      Take a look at South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong as once very poor countries that now have a high standard of living. Or China and India that have reduced poverty rates significantly in the 1990's.

    6. Re:Dangers of GM food by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      Bah... I have high blood pressure and heart paliptations. Have for years, and I'm 23. I drink at least three pots a day of stout New Orleans style coffee with chicory. When I can't get that, it's Code Red Mountain Dew. (Diet - the sugar jacks me up.) Since the time I first noticed a real and true caffeine addiction, I also observed an evening-out of my heart rate, and more normal blood pressure. Been off my blood pressure meds for two years now, feel great. Unless I don't get my coffee. Then my blood pressure and hear rate get crazy.

      So, to summarize... You slip me decaf and I don't notice, and at least one of us is gonna die. Fortunately, decaf in its current incarnation taste like shit, and I'd prefer to keep it that way.

  13. And doubtless before long by panurge · · Score: 5, Funny
    Coders will be growing illicit high-strength skunk coffee beans under arc lights in their basements.

    Someone needs to look at what the whole drive for effectless "drugs" tells us about society. THC free hemp yes, because hemp is a useful plant (makes good cloth,easier to grow than cotton). But surely the sole purpose of coffee beans is to produce...coffee? If you don't like the side effects, there are any number of alternatives. Decaffeinated coffee is like devaluing the brand name.

    Or perhaps I've missed the business implications. Perhaps I should just patent my new process for making alcohol free vodka, and get rich.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:And doubtless before long by The_dev0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know about you, but I grow illicit high-strength skunk weed buds for the flavour, too.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    2. Re:And doubtless before long by panic_smooth · · Score: 1

      has anyone ever tried smoking coffee? of either variety?

      --
    3. Re:And doubtless before long by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yes, when I was a teenager (back in the early 14th century) I tried smoking coffee. And tea. And cocoa.

      Conclusion:

      Don't bother replicating the experiment.

  14. Insightful? Who modded that insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like chocolate ice cream! Can I get modded up now?

    A two sentence post expressing a personal preference shouldn't satisfy anyone's definition of insight.

  15. you would think by m1chael · · Score: 0

    that they think that people are addicted to the taste...

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  16. Today's Dilbert by more+fool+you · · Score: 2, Redundant
    What a coincidence

    hey i realise there's a dilbert for every occasion. but this is um, not quite spooky, but close

    1. Re:Today's Dilbert by szo · · Score: 1

      Is this coincidence?

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
  17. Wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd wait for SP1 before drinking an untested release.

  18. Tell me it ain't so... by Lord+Prox · · Score: 1

    For the love of Vinton Cerf, NoooOOOOooooo (Said in a... I just found out Vader was my daddy voice)

    In this day and age, with all natural shampoo with chemicals I can't pronounce, there was always this refuge.
    My sanctuary now defiled.
    Damn them! Damn them to sleep.

  19. Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by CountBrass · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You would have thought that now scientists have decided they were wrong about cholesterol and that eating margarine rather than butter and cutting out eggs was actually "a really bad idea"(TM the food industry) they'd learn to leave alone.

    We spent millions of years to evolving to eat the shit that grows around us - not some factory grown crap that no-one actually has any idea about what it's effects on everything else (us, other plants, the biosphere) might be. Some scientist with too much funding and driven by greedy food corporations (Hi Monsanto!) simply is not going to improve on what we evolved to consume.

    Sometimes I despair at the thought that a company will produce "Batchelor Chow" (and then realise they have - it's called Pot Noodle in the UK). And that it won't be Matrix style uber-computers feeding us recycled human but uber-corporations run by humans.

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by LoztInSpace · · Score: 1

      I'd start to get concerned when the coffee, sugar and milk all come from the same organism.

    2. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      What, you never been to Starbucks?

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    3. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Now with flavour"

    4. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know about your particular species, but humans did not evolve millions of years to eat the shit that JUST GROWS around us. Most of the shit we ate for the last millions of years is gone... what we eat is what we BREED AND CULTIVATE.

      We're "civilized" now. We cultivate, and genetically-engineer the food we need, and exterminate species that we find sub-optimal when new "frankenfoods" are found.

      This is not new. It predates all corporations, industrialization, etc. We've been doing this ever since we discovered agriculture and the domestication of animals, which was a few tens of thousands of years ago.

      Cows and chickens are frankenanimals. Corn and wheat are frankenfoods. We use genetically-engineered felines (cats) for industrial (pest control) and emotional purposes (pets). We breed qualities into and out of living organism according to our needs.

      If you're going to attack Monsanto because of the dangers of new, more efficient ways to genetically-engineer life, at least realize that we've been doing this for a long, long time. We have had our disasters and our successes, but already our nutrition is based on thousands of years of Frankenfoods.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    5. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

      We've been doing this ever since we discovered agriculture and the domestication of animals, which was a few tens of thousands of years ago.

      Actually quite a few books on nutrition recommend staying away from lots of grains since they are relatively new. Some people think this is a big contributor to obesity and diabetes. Maybe we have been breeding and growing foods to meet our needs for thousands of years, but this is certainly much different than eating chemicals or GMO!

    6. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by christophe · · Score: 1

      Difference : when breeding animals, we don't add anything into the gene pool. Genes are the same as thousands of years ago, expression and selection is just different. We have adapted to them.
      Genetically-engineered animals and plants include new genes that were not there before. They may spread to other species when used openly. Long-terme effects are totally unknown.
      This can be useful technology (eg. cows which have new drugs in their milk), but PLEASE, not in the food I eat everyday. That's playing with fire. I want my tomatoes to be the same than the ones my great-grand-fathers grew. No chemicals, no new genes, no license on the seeds.
      And no, I DO NOT TRUST the corporations that create them.

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    7. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh stop it.

      Breeding is not equal to genetical engineering. There is no way to do transgenetic breeding, iow. to introduce genes from one species into another species by breeding. With GE, it's no problem at all; bioluminous tabacco plants (with firefly genes) anyone?

      Consider this before you claim GE is harmless or nothing new.

    8. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by bourne · · Score: 1

      I don't know about your particular species, but humans did not evolve millions of years to eat the shit that JUST GROWS around us. Most of the shit we ate for the last millions of years is gone... what we eat is what we BREED AND CULTIVATE.

      Right on. There's a section of Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs & Steel which discusses how (IIRC) the almond, originally poisonous, was altered over the years as humans and animals preferred and reproduced the less dangerous variations over the more dangerous variations.

      Heck, just wander into the supermarket near Thanksgiving. Do the anti-GE food people think 25-pound turkeys come with 15-pound breasts in the wild?

    9. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Kvan · · Score: 1
      But what does introducing genes from another species do? It enables the organism to produce a protein it could not previously produce.

      Can you promise me that, in thousands upon thousands of years of selective breeding, we have not even once managed to breed a mutation which coded for a protein never before expressed in the crop? Consider this before you claim GE is something new.

      --

      "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
      - 'K' in Men in Black.

    10. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by CaptRespect · · Score: 1

      This guy must be a member of the EU, who are tighting laws regulating forms of "Frankenfood" to all other EU countries. Of course all these laws are based on the way they "feel" and not actual science or facts.

      (http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/new si d/20182/newsDate/17-Mar-2003/story.htm)

      Makes no sense to me. If you can make nature better then why not do it? You guys are paranoid.

    11. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Can you promise me that, in thousands upon thousands of years of selective breeding, we have not even once managed to breed a mutation which coded for a protein never before expressed in the crop?

      Well if we managed to do so, it wouldn't be selective breeding now, would it (call it mutative breeding)? Breeding selects specific existing features in a species. So I can't promise, but if it happened it wasn't done on purpose.

      Also note mutations are "freak accidents", with GE you just churn out altered genes that would take eons to evolve by mutation (if at all). GE is messing with evolution on a much bigger scale than selective breeding is.

    12. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      bioluminous tabacco plants (with firefly genes) anyone?

      Seems that something like that would be quite useful, as well as incredibly cool...Imagine outdoor night lighting, but without the need for electricty to power the lights.

    13. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by jafuser · · Score: 1

      Some scientist with too much funding and driven by greedy food corporations (Hi Monsanto!) simply is not going to improve on what we evolved to consume.

      Oh you mean the same type of scientists who suddenly decided that eggs and butter are ok?

      BTW, what is this pot noodle which you speak of? =)

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    14. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Genes are the same as thousands of years ago, expression and selection is just different. We have adapted to them.

      I agree with almost everything you say except that bit. The genes of today are not the genes of yesterday. The reason is mutation.

    15. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Uhh, this has been done already...

      Couldn't find a better link, sorry.

    16. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ask: Do we really need more Frankenfoods ?
      Well, probably not, but this is entirely different... it's a FrankenDrink!!! ba da dum

    17. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Nice...Thanks for the link.

      Now, if they could just do it with a plant that will grow happily in the frozen wasteland that is Western NY 6 months out of the year, i'd be set :)

    18. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1
      If you're going to attack Monsanto because of the dangers of new, more efficient ways to genetically-engineer life, at least realize that we've been doing this for a long, long time.

      What is disturbing is that Monsanto has the ability to make a much greater mutation between generations, like orders of magnitude greater than a traditional breeder. Even more discomforting is that Monsanto does not research for the public good. It has first and foremost the profit motive in mind. So thirty year studies to find long term and unintended consequences? Forget those. By then, you and your kids will have ingested tons of their GM corn, soybeans, etc.

      It's not that I'm against GM as a principle, I'm just worried that a for-profit company is not the best institution to be entrusted with this.

      --

      Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    19. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Give me a hundred thousand tobacco plants, a hundred thousand years, and I will show you some bioluminescence. (In a nice Stupid Luddite Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley pattern on the leaves if you ask nicely) There is nothing special about the genes from the firefly that make them evil to put in tobacco plants. It's just a protein sequence there was no selective pressure on tobacco plants to develop.

      We could 'naturally' breed in the characteristics we desire, but why wait so long? Genetic modification speeds up the process.

    20. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if anything would convince a bunch of otherwise stridently libertarian coder geeks that genetically modified food is bad, this particular GMO would do it! "Monsanto is threatening our caffeine! To arms!"

    21. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      This is exactly the problem: you argue "why wait" so you speed up evolution with genetic modification. You have reduced your hundred thousand years to just one year.

      Next year someone else inserts another foreign gene into your plant, and the next year, and the year after that. After just a few decades, your plant would have changed a lot, and you have no way whatsoever of knowing what effects these changes will have on other species because of the short timespan in which they occur.

    22. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by christophe · · Score: 1

      Right. Don't know how many significant mutations there are on current vegetables, pets and humans since Homo Sapiens appeared, but no so much I think.
      GE-species are like a super-mutation, very quick, always significant (no neutral change), and outside of natural selection.

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    23. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      We spent millions of years to evolving to eat the shit that grows around us - not some factory grown crap that no-one actually has any idea about what it's effects on everything else (us, other plants, the biosphere) might be. Some scientist with too much funding and driven by greedy food corporations (Hi Monsanto!) simply is not going to improve on what we evolved to consume.

      I'm pretty sure that our ancestors did not evolve with access to dried, roasted coffee beans, boiling water, or espresso machines.

      Caffeine may or may not be harmful (it's certainly not extremely dangerous; we'd all be dead) but it is by no means an essential part of the diet. Why shouldn't people who don't like its effects have the opportunity to avoid it?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    24. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Catnapster · · Score: 1
      Sometimes I despair at the thought that a company will produce "Batchelor Chow" (and then realise they have - it's called Pot Noodle in the UK). And that it won't be Matrix style uber-computers feeding us recycled human but uber-corporations run by humans.
      Soylent Green is made from PEOPLE! PEEEOPLE!
      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    25. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      When breeding animals, we wait for the genes we need to appear by mutation. They are not necessarily the same genes.

      But this all makes no difference, in my opinion.

      Our old-style Frankenfoods and Frankenanimals have always had unknown long-term effects. We have caused "ecological disasters" numberless times by creating or transplanting lifeforms.

      This is a quantitative difference, not a qualitative difference.

      You want mankind to be more careful? Good. You want us to be conservative with our genetic experiments? Great. Maybe we could avoid the mistakes of the past while repeating or improving the successes...

      Just don't pretend the tomatoes your grandparents ate are "the way Nature intended", and don't use that as an argument to stop millenia of historical inertia, because it's not going to work.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    26. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by christophe · · Score: 1

      >When breeding animals, we wait for the genes we need >to appear by mutation. They are not necessarily the >same genes.

      I don't think new genes appear when breeding animals, not on so small a timescale as a few human generations. Selection and breeding alone are already rather powerful. [Waiting for an answer on a .bio. newsgroup tout be sure though].

      >Just don't pretend the tomatoes your grandparents >ate are "the way Nature intended",

      No, they aren't, of course.

      >and don't use that as an argument to stop millenia of >historical inertia, because it's not going to work.

      Historical inertia ? We didn't use to throw new genes in the wild, at least not at the scale Monsanto & co would like to.
      We always used to improve the species of course, but the "old fashioned" method is already powerful enough and safe (A small continent as Europe produces already too much for its dense population).

      What scares me (and much Europeans), is the careless realease in the wild of genes that were never where, without really knowing if it is dangerous or not. GM species in laboratories, and free of "intellectual property", don't make me afraid.

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    27. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Putting genes into plants is not speeding up evolution. So comparing evolution to GMO isn't accurate. GMO is like selective breeding though, because both change the properties of the target. GMO is just more effective, and can do so much more.

      I don't see any problems with any modifications like these. Do you really think another protein in a plant is going to cause horrible mutations in humans? It probably won't affect animals with high metabolisms at all.

      Yes, after a hundred years of genetically modifying species something *might* go awry. But you misunderestimate the robustness (not the word I was trying to think of) of life. I don't want these terribly hypothetical situations preventing anything with such great benefits from being used.

    28. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by MartianKillerBarbies · · Score: 1

      Or we could move to Florida? ;)

      --

      "I am not a shrimp - I am a King Prawn! Pepe, "Muppets in Space"
    29. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      I don't see any problems with any modifications like these. Do you really think another protein in a plant is going to cause horrible mutations in humans? It probably won't affect animals with high metabolisms at all.

      No, I think that if such a plant is a commercial success, it will be grown large scale in open fields so containment will be impossible. Sooner or later the modified plant will spread into nature and its genes will spread into the gene pool of the (wild) species.

      This can have its effect on insects and especially worms, fungi and bacteria that have a some kind of relationship with the species. These creatures in their turn are eaten or otherwise depended upon, and this way the effect could be carried through at least part of the food chain.

      I'm not particulary psyched up about mutations in humans, its the small stuff that keeps a biotope running I'm worried about. Simple scenario: a modified plant species causes a symbiotic fungus to evolve into something less benign, resulting in fungal and bacterial sterilisation of parts of the habitat.

    30. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 1
      There is no way to do transgenetic breeding, iow. to introduce genes from one species into another species by breeding.


      Really? Funny, I had thought hybridization was common in agriculture, and documented for at least a few centuries.

      Must be that all that talk about citrus hybrids is crazy talk.

      And we all know that mules were created by Monsanto through Genetic Engineering.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    31. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 1


      I fail to see why anyone should be "entrusted" with this, just like I fail to see how or why we're supposed to "not entrust" this.

      Advances of any technological kind are developed and deployed for multiple reasons, including randomness, most often personal or group greed, but very rarely "for the public good".

      Thinking of this as a privilege that is "entrusted" to a private or public interest is not going to control the situation. If anything, it will put it in control of whoever is "entrusted".

      We don't "entrust" medical equipment manufacturers with our lives. They provide a product, we buy and use it, and we make sure failure has terrible consequences for them. The "trust", and the quality of the equipment, does not depend on whether they can make a profit or not.

      You want private interests to take into account the long-term consequences? Make that be in their own greedy interests. That may include regulations, taxes, controls, and/or public consumer pressure, but it also implies accepting that they will do what is more convenient for them, and as long as this is convenient for someone, it will be developed and at some point deployed.

      In other words, if you want to control it, pragmatic considerations will be much more helpful than moralistic rethoric.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    32. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      The timescale for the appearance of mutations depends on the generations of the species being mutated, not on the observers'.

      Not everything is a fruit fly (favorite animal to observe natural mutations, I think); but 1 or 2 generations per year (seasonal plants) provide a lot of generations and genetic variety within a single human lifetime to observe.

      I'm not too convinced about the relative safety of the traditional methods, or the unsafety of the GM methods. At least not on the fundamental level. If anything, having more control over the changes (GM) would make it a bit easier to predict the consequences. It's not like nature naturally makes changes safer than GM would, they're quite random and we're usually doing the selection before letting evolution kill off the problematic ones (that long-term thing).

      The problem is how often we hit the jackpot. GM offers the opportunity to hit the jackpot more often, and hence, to take the (same or lesser) risk more often.

      But if we abandoned GM completely and directed all those resources to methodically exploit random mutations, would it be that much safer? That much better?

      More importantly, could we keep everyone in line?

      We carelessly introduced new species to different ecologies to feed, clothe, comfort ourselves. To improve our efficiency as a civilization.

      It may be possible (yet not easy) to consider stopping the improvement of other species when there is no pressing need for any of that, when it's a matter of profit-margins for corporations. When a nation has enough food not only to eat, but to throw away at pleasure, to wonder whether it is ethical to eat a hamburger instead of a carefully planned diet of feta cheese and pills.

      But there are nations that still have starvation problems, that still have ecosystems that are inefficient for their human populations, that can't worry about the suffering of their cattle because they have to worry about having a biomass to eat in the first place.

      They need frankenfoods, GM are faster to develop for their needs, and someone will provide them. If not now by Monsanto, as the research becomes more inexpensive (and it will), someone else will.

      The problem will not be whether Monsanto or anyone else makes a profit. The problem will be whether they don't screw up their ecosystem (and food supply), as well as other nations', in a few generations. This will not be prevented by stopping GM, it will be prevented by sensible GM research.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    33. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      It sure would be interesting to see what happens if such a situation occured. I don't think this is such a big hit to the potential for genetically modified organisms, however. It's a cost/benefit thing. And we just need to keep an eye on it (which admittedly might be difficult, but I don't think it has to be).

    34. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by christophe · · Score: 1

      >But if we abandoned GM completely and
      >directed all those resources to methodically
      >exploit random mutations, would it be that much
      >safer? That much better?


      That would make the speed much slower! Especially when today's cultures are much more homogenous than in the past (which is itself another danger).

      >More importantly, could we keep everyone in line?

      We did agree to do something worldwide to preserve the ozone layer, we were not so far for the CO2. Why not for something else?

      Economical power is another thing. When Europe refuses to import GM species, and expect to have traces and proof of the origin of each beef part, soja or corn seed, this puts the pressure on other countries NOT to grow GM just to avoid the problems of having GM and not-GM species separated.

      BTW, the main reason that Europe is so conservative about GM species is that there were enough scandals like ESB (mad cows), were it was played with fire just for productivity reasons.

      >It may be possible (yet not easy) to consider
      >stopping the improvement of other species when


      I agree (although there is a gap between stopping overuse of GM and stopping improvement of species).

      >But there are nations that still have starvation
      >problems, that still have ecosystems that are
      >inefficient for their human populations, ...


      I still don't believe this. Food supplys are enough, even in the Thirld World. Real reasons of starvation are more political (wars, corruption, bad transports, lack of education, few machines...) than linked to the quality of the species.

      These countries have more to lose than to win from corporations'GM (you can't keep the seed for next year for some of them, remember...). WOuld you like to have your country's main food under total control of a foreign corporation? Bad relations with the US or Switzerland? -> No seeds anymore! And chemicals would only be available for GM-species who can resist them, all others would kill natural tomatoes/corn...

      Still, that would not be a reason why GM should be blindly allowed in Europe, where we produce much more than necessary.


      >This will not be prevented by stopping GM, it
      >will be prevented by sensible GM research.


      I totally agree that research must never be stopped. Some GM species, for example for cheap production of drugs, could be very useful. Or if some genes, after long studies, are proved totally harmless and are not found back in wild species, or prove a real benefit (NO chemicals anymore in the fields).

      What is dangerous is a 'laissez faire' attitude. I'd compare this with nuclear plants : if a mistake is made, you can't put the radioactivity/genes in the box. It is a duty to be paranoid in this case.

      (BTW, we'll have this problem in a few years again with nanotechnologies if some of these nanorobots can reproduce in the wild...)

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    35. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Read my other posts :)

      Hybridization occurs naturally only in very closely related species (generally within the same genus). This is different from trying to introduce animal genes into a plant species; chances of this happening in nature are very, very small; chances the resulting creature will be able to reproduce and carry its genes into a next generation are even smaller.

      So, yes; evolutional differentiation is not as straightforward as it seems and the species boundary within a genus isn't always clear. This does not warrant mixing genes of very different species is harmless.

      My opinion: if it doesn't mate in nature, we shouldn't try to overcome that boundary by genetic manipulation.

    36. Re:Do we really need more Frankenfoods ? by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      We did agree to do something worldwide to preserve the ozone layer, we were not so far for the CO2. Why not for something else?

      Indeed, why not? The trick is that when we did decide to do something about the ozone layer, we recognized that we couldn't keep everyone in line with the kind of strict measures developed countries could afford (even if they didn't want to either).

      We all agreed to do something gradual and affordable, after much discussion, which the industry could live with. Reductions, replacement of dangerous technologies, etc.

      Despite accusations of the measures being "too little, too late", in part justified by certain developed countries and industries backing off from their own agreements, this approach was more successful than banning all the processes in panic.

      I still don't believe this. Food supplys are enough, even in the Thirld World. Real reasons of starvation are more political (wars, corruption, bad transports, lack of education, few machines...) than linked to the quality of the species.

      The problem is not the statistical number that indicates "food supply" in most cases. The problem is distribution of said food supply.

      We have more than enough food to feed the world. It just so happens that the food is in the wrong places, and taking it where it's needed in an edible state can be costly, risky, and quite difficult. So we end up with warehouses of rotting grains. The same thing happens in a smaller scale in many places.

      Transportation is not a trivial technological problem. We have always been able to carry food with us when we need to (war), but it's not practical beyond a certain scale. What we need is for certain geographical regions to be less dependent on food transportation, and that implies getting them to be as efficient as the main food producers (such as the US).

      These are also the countries with the highest population growth. We need to grow food right there.

      These countries have more to lose than to win from corporations'GM (you can't keep the seed for next year for some of them, remember...). WOuld you like to have your country's main food under total control of a foreign corporation? Bad relations with the US or Switzerland? -> No seeds anymore! And chemicals would only be available for GM-species who can resist them, all others would kill natural tomatoes/corn...

      It would be quite stupid to get into that situation. And I'm sure many countries will be just as stupid.

      This, however, is not an argument against GM foods. It's an argument against forming bad business relationships that put countries in a situation of technological dependence, which translates into political dependence.

      It's doesn't mean abandoning GM is a good idea for a developing nation, just like it doesn't mean stopping oil production is. The same situation has applied to traditional agriculture more than once.

      As the research cost decreases (and it will, both pushed by advances in GM research and by medical genetic research), there will appear competitors, and better business and social terms will be offered.

      My argument isn't against not buying GM. My argument is against dismissing them in an absolute fashion, and against the use of terms like "Frankenfood" that give a moral rethoric of no substance to justify policy decisions to the public, since pragmatic measures tinged with moral rethoric tend to turn either hypocritical or fundamentalist.

      What is dangerous is a 'laissez faire' attitude. I'd compare this with nuclear plants : if a mistake is made, you can't put the radioactivity/genes in the box. It is a duty to be paranoid in this case.

      That is a pretty good analogy. Nuclear plants can be dangerous indeed, and catastrophic mistakes can be quite costly. The laissez faire attitude dreamed of in the 50s and 60s, with cheap, nucl

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
  20. I didn't think people would be stupid enough.... by sould · · Score: 3, Funny

    to buy my thc-free marjiuana before.

    But now I'm not so sure.

  21. decaf, oh, the horror! by Shooter6947 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm kind of surprised that people are so shocked that someone might actually make, or drink, decaffinated coffee. Its not like this is a perversion of nature or something, the point is that there is a huge market out there for the stuff. Millions of people drink decaf every day.

    We may not understand it, but the point is that genetically modifying the plant to produce less caffeine is both safer, and tastes better, than whatever god-awful shit they do to it now.

    I guess I just think this is a cool, and potentially profitable use for the level of genetic engineering that we are able to do nowadays. If this kind of stuff works, and makes money, then we get to see the really neat stuff down the road!

    1. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by LordSah · · Score: 1

      Decaffinated coffee was discovered acctidentally (around the turn of the century, if I recall) when a ship loaded with coffee beans from South America was caught in a nasty storm. Its deck and hold were awash with sea water for 8+ hours. The owners of the cargo, attempting to salvage the beans, made coffee with it anyway. The taste was different, and analysis showed that it had less caffeine. They marketed it as "decaffeinated" coffee, and a product was born.

      There are several chemicals that dissolve caffeine, and I assume sea water has some of them. Read up here for modern methods of decaffeination.

      Personally, I like the taste of coffee, and it'd be kinda nice to have a no-caffeine variant that tasted the same as full-octane stuff. Great for having a cup before bed.

    2. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm kind of surprised that people are so shocked that someone might actually make, or drink, decaffinated coffee. Its not like this is a perversion of nature or something, the point is that there is a huge market out there for the stuff. Millions of people drink decaf every day.

      Hmmmm, I am about to write something that was recently modded down as a flamebait, but hey - who's afraid of dekarmaized karma? Anyway, I really think it is a a matter of America vs Europe. From my (obviously superficial) observation I take that Americans drink coffee the way Europeans drink tea. Just as a generic hot-and-aromatic drink that you drink dozen times a day. In Europe, you want coffee exactly when you want coffee with all the "boost" it gives and it's rarely more often than 2-3 a day. So decaf coffee really sounds like some oxy-moronic idea on this side of the pond, but in America it's almost a matter of your biological survival. If you want to drink strong Italian espresso with the same frequency as you drink your decaf, you'll be all dead before 2010 :-)

    3. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by dwerg · · Score: 1


      In Europe, you want coffee exactly when you want coffee with all the "boost" it gives and it's rarely more often than 2-3 a day.


      Most people I know drink 2-3 cups after dinner, and that's just to wash away the food.

    4. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Personally, I like the taste of coffee, and it'd be kinda nice to have a no-caffeine variant that tasted the same as full-octane stuff.

      Unfortunately, caffeine does play a role in flavouring coffee. IMHO, decaf tastes a little dull.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Certainly, and I really like the taste of beer, that's why i grab myself a couple alcohol-free beers in the morning before making the commute to work. Once though, I was picked up for speeding and swirving a little. me thinks perhaps I grabbed the wrong bottles that morning. anyway...

      caffinated beverages are consumed for their stimulating properties, alcoholic beverages are consumed for their alcoholic properties and water is consumed for its thirst quenching properties. some how i think this shit's here for a reason.

      fat free hamburgers... carb free pancakes ... non-dairy creamer... dupe-free slashdot...

    6. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's other differences, as well - European coffee is generally much stronger (in taste, and presumably caffeine as well) than American coffee. And this is probably more universally true than the claim that Americans drink more coffee.

      While it may be true that tee is more popular than coffee in Britain and some central European countries, it certainly isn't true in other European countries.

    7. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      around the turn of the century, if I recall

      I assume you mean the last century :-)

    8. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes sense, since Europeans generally eat dinner at 8pm or so. I know I certainly like to drink a nice big hot cup of strong coffee before going to bed; helps me relax.

    9. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it never given me any problems with falling asleep, though I've been drinking since I was 2.
      Well it was mostly milk back then but I've never really stopped since so could be that I simply don't note the effect on me.

      Remember: The Devil made decaf.

      -the_bean42

    10. Re:decaf, oh, the horror! by LordSah · · Score: 1

      caffinated beverages are consumed for their stimulating properties, alcoholic beverages are consumed for their alcoholic properties and water is consumed for its thirst quenching properties. some how i think this shit's here for a reason.

      I think people eat chocolate because they like it. Not for its stimulating and blood-sugar elevating properties. Same can be said for coffee.

      You joke about alcohol free beer, but folks have made beer seasoning, which could eventually make it into beer flavored chips, for example. Folks really can like something for what it is, rather than its biochemical properties.

  22. Or... by CountBrass · · Score: 2, Funny

    Decaffeinated diet coke (aka water).

    --
    Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    1. Re:Or... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Decaffeinated diet coke (aka water).

      Or my favorite: Caffeine-free Diet Mountain Dew.

    2. Re:Or... by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, for those who don't want the heart palpitations or the sugar, but wish to simply have carcinogen-flavored carbonated water instead.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    3. Re:Or... by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      Look... let's just say that if there's anything in Mountain Dew that causes cancer, I'd be dead by now.

      No, I am not dead.

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    4. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I am not dead.
      Ya, but when you do die, a doctor is going to walk by, take one look at you, and say, "it was the Mountain Dew". Then he's going to do some coke.

  23. Just another data point by Cally · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure this story will be full of "what's the point?!" comments. Just a single data point / anecdotal bit of evidence. I always had trouble getting to sleep (and, consequently, getting up in the morning) although I stuck to only two or three cups of instant, and nothing after midday/1pm. Just for the hell of it, I had a cup of tea for my morning kickstart a couple of weeks ago, and stayed off coffee the rest of the day. Result: solid refreshing sleep;
    4) happiness! (better than profit! any day...)

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    1. Re:Just another data point by UrGeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Good for you! If you don't want caffeine, why drink coffee? There are thousands of alternatives.

      But for me, let me say:

      It is by caffeine alone
      I set my mind in motion,
      It is by the beans of Java
      That my thoughts aquire speed,
      The hand aquire shakes,
      The shakes becomes a warning,
      It is by caffeine alone
      I set my mind in motion.

    2. Re:Just another data point by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere on the internet (so it must be true) that ordinary (black) tea has more caffeine in it than coffee. I think it said that in its raw form tea had less caffeine than coffee, but when prepared, it had more.

      graspee

    3. Re:Just another data point by dwerg · · Score: 1

      I actually drink coffee because I like it, not because of the caffeine.

    4. Re:Just another data point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, sweet!

    5. Re:Just another data point by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

      *CLAPS* well spoken brother!

      --
      The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    6. Re:Just another data point by praedor · · Score: 1

      A thing of beauty. I warn you, I may steal that for use as a sig (I will give you credit, however).

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    7. Re:Just another data point by Zirnike · · Score: 1
      The original quote was as follows, though:

      It is by caffine alone I set my mind in motion
      It is by the Coca-Cola that my mind acquires speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning
      It is by caffine alone I set my mind in motion.

      And don't quote me on that, it's not mine, either.

      --
      I'm not shy, I'm stalking my prey
    8. Re:Just another data point by UrGeek · · Score: 1

      I hated coffee until I was 40. I loved the coffee flavor and everything coffee flavored but the real thing was too much. Everytime I tried it, I ended up drinking coffee flavored cream and sugar.

      But then I awoke fat and middleaged and learned to depend on the caffeine. Now I have developed a taste for STRONG coffee. I love the taste of espresso in the morning. It taste like victory.

      I have also a great love for parody.

    9. Re:Just another data point by UrGeek · · Score: 1

      There was no mention of Coca-Cola on the bumper sticker of the Jeep Cheokee in the parking lot of IBM Austin that I saw. I wish I could say it was original but it is not.

      I never understood people who are sensitive to Cola-Coca. Even the stongest mainstream soft drink, Mountain Dew, has no such affect on me. Love the taste of them both though.

      Credit goes to Frank Herbert first. Would it be great of he was also the source of this parody? I hope he is have a good time with Edgar Allen Poe, H.P. Lovecraft, and Mary Shelly.

  24. Coffee = Bad breath + motivation to talk a lot by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm all for decaf. At least for my co-workers.

  25. Have you tried your local school? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Strangely enough though there is a good market for non-thc material. THe trouble is when the farmers try to convince the stoners they aren't missing out on anything.

    1. Re:Have you tried your local school? by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      Industrial hemp has many uses. And all MJ sites I've seen seem knowledgeable enough to know it's not worth smoking.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  26. Seinfeld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Would you like something to drink ?

    Kramer : Decaf Capuccino

  27. Placebo by tommten · · Score: 1

    "Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people"

    isn't that what it's for?

    Placebo-coffee anyone?

    --
    - I choked on the red pill and now I'm stuck in limbo
  28. In other news... by HornyBastard77 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...consumption of coffee is expected to increase by over 200 percent.

  29. Decaf by Rumagent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Decaf is like masturbation. When it is all you have it is ok. But, man you would die for the real thing!

    Don't laugh. Just like me you are reading slashdot. You know what I am talking about;)

    1. Re:Decaf by DAVEO · · Score: 1
      Don't laugh.

      We won't. You're not funny.

      --
      -DAVEO
    2. Re:Decaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Funnier than you, coma-boy!

    3. Re:Decaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Coma-boy, right?

      I guess I've been at kuro5hin too long and forgot the standard of "humor" around this place.

    4. Re:Decaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That word is banned here.

      You're IP is perm banned, so go play at 5hin.

    5. Re:Decaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess you should have never left there. We certainly don't want you here with your crappy attitude.

  30. THC by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    How about pot without the THC? Then everyone who smokes the stuff can think they are cool. But in reality, they are a bunch of posers.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:THC by packeteer · · Score: 1

      There are strains of the plant that dont contain any THC or very little at all. These are legal to own, grow, and smoke. I supose it could be kinda funny to watch someone load a fat bowl in a bong and smoke it on the steps leading up to a police station.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:THC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > There are strains of the plant that dont contain any THC or very little at all.

      I live near a federal agricultural research institute. On several large fields, they grow a variety of huge THC-free hemp plants. In the beginning, those plants disappeared faster than they could plant them; then they installed huge (and I mean _huge_) billboards informing potential pillagers that there was no THC worth speaking of in those buggers, and illuminated the billboards at night for good measure. I spoke to one of the guys who is in that particular project, and he says that now the "shrinkage" is now down to a tolerable 10% and that the billboards and the illumination are still cheaper than installing barbed-wire fences and having Dobermans running around.

      10 % of those rather large hemp cultures is still a rather impressve amount of (ineffective) weed, and I wonder what happens with it. I guess it must be ending up in households where decaffeinated coffee is drunk.

    3. Re:THC by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Actually, the regular hemp plant that they use for fibre (for rope or trendy clothes) yields only traces of tetrahydrocannabinol.

    4. Re:THC by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      It's probably stolen by drug dealers who then pass it off as the real thing. Or, since we're so used to being lied to by the government (I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa, etc.) people assume that if the sign says there's no THC then the plants must have THC.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
  31. WARNING: It's a link to the Goatse guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nt.

  32. For reference... by brucmack · · Score: 3, Informative

    For reference, here's a summary of some current decaffeination processes. An excerpt:

    "Coffee is decaffeinated using a variety of processes. All of which are relatively harmless to your health, but harmful to the beverage quality."

  33. Genetically altered :-( by horcy · · Score: 1

    I really donâ(TM)t like stuff that's genetically altered.
    Why do people keep consuming stuff
    if they know they cant handle it.
    They rather make it into their own taste :(
    then leaving it alone.
    I only eat drink natural/bio products that
    are not genetically altered in any way.
    Most of the time you pay a bit more, but then
    I know it's not rubbish.
    I F@#$@#-ing need my particularly damn fine cup a coffee (soaking in caffeine)

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
    1. Re:Genetically altered :-( by arose · · Score: 1
      I only eat drink natural/bio products that are not genetically altered in any way.
      You may have missed that little thing called evolution. It's been accelerated trough selection for almost anything people eat.
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  34. yeah by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people

    Yeah, great stuff!

  35. I hear they are including by TitanBL · · Score: 2, Funny

    a pack of nicotine free cigarettes with every purchase.

  36. I'd rather... by vierja · · Score: 1
    ..grow Gin&Tonic seeds in my backyard...

    That would be a major improvement... hehe

  37. proof the world is going barmy by ajs318 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Surely the kind of person who thinks caffeine will kill them, is hardly likely to touch a genetically modified plant? Never mind that maize, wheat, barley et al are all genetically modified grass, and cabbages, Brussels sprouts, broccoli and swedes are all genetically modified turnips. OK, in those cases the GM was done the slow way, but evolution is still technically genetic modification.

    If ever anyone needed concrete evidence that the world is going stark, raving bonkers, this is surely it. First it was Lucozade Light {for the benefit of foreigners, Lucozade is a high-calorie drink with glucose for an instant energy boost. Table sugar is sucrose, which the body has to hydrolyse into glucose and fructose.} The whole point of Lucozade is to provide quickly-assimilated calories. If you need fewer calories then just drink less; if you still need fluid then dilute it with water.

    Not so long ago we ate loads of fried food, fat and sugar, we smoked woodbines, we drank beer and whisky all the time and we didn't die! We weren't all pasty-faced, nesh asthmatics either. Nowadays it is "trendy" to be a health freak, so people latch onto any convenient buzz-words without thinking properly what they mean. Then they drive their cars from the bedroom to the bathroom to the gym, where they pay good money to sit on a fake bike and pedal nowhere. I bet some young mother somewhere is probably bringing up a baby exclusively on soya milk because she thinks breast milk is bad for you.

    Last year, in a Tesco supermarket, I found Organic Milk -- available in skimmed and semi-skimmed varieties, but not full cream. So, you go organic to get nothing artificial added, then they go and take something natural away. {it's not that long ago I remember drinking unpasteurised milk - a test of faith in the immune system :) but a worthwhile one}.

    What next, decaffeinated Red Bull? For crying out loud, if you don't like the thought of caffeine, then don't drink coffee! Or drink tea, which contains something that stops your body absorbing caffeine.

    Somebody needs to patent a home coffee decaffeinator - and maybe a home milk skimmer/semi-skimmer - to sell to the trendy brigade. Or, failing that, a way of distributing a clue .....

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some people like decaf because of the taste and for some people it is a habit. For example, I am straight edge and don't eat meat, but I still eat soy-based chicken sandwiches. I do so because when I ate meat chicken was a food that I liked. I'm sure I could probably find something a lot better, but it is just habit.

    2. Re:proof the world is going barmy by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is exactly the kind of thing I'm talking about. If you like textured protein, just make it by feeding complex carbohydrates -- the kind human beings can shit out undigested -- to some animal that can metabolise them, wait awhile and eat that animal. Much more natural. Probably even less environmentally damaging than soya processing plants? It doesn't give you the opportunity for mortality-denial, of course. Human being have three different kinds of teeth and a short digestive tract for a reason, for crying out loud. Non-dependence on taurine {you look it up for a change} is just a bonus for short-term survival, and some people get killed by something else first.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    3. Re:proof the world is going barmy by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      We weren't all pasty-faced, nesh asthmatics either.

      I'd just like to congratulate you for the first use of the word 'nesh' I've seen on /. - The southerners won't get that one, let alone the Yanks!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    4. Re:proof the world is going barmy by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Brussels sprouts, broccoli and swedes are all genetically modified turnips.

      Is that a typo? Either way I got a good chuckle out of it.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    5. Re:proof the world is going barmy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      I remember drinking unpasteurised milk - a test of faith in the immune system :) but a worthwhile one

      When I was a kid in Guernsey (Channel Islands, home of the Guernsey cow) we used to get raw (unpasteurised) milk delivered into the jug of our choice on our doorstep.

      I don't recall having died as a result of consuming it :-)

    6. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cor blimey, that's a bit o' a sticky wicket of a word, eh wot?

    7. Re:proof the world is going barmy by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      When I was a kid in Guernsey (Channel Islands, home of the Guernsey cow) we used to get raw (unpasteurised) milk delivered into the jug of our choice on our doorstep.

      Can't say that I've gone that far, but the milk that was delivered to us for the couple of years we were in England in the mid-80s wasn't homogenized. On a cold-enough morning, if the milk wasn't brought inside soon enough after it was delivered, the cream that was floating on top would start to freeze and push the foil cap off the bottle. Ice cream, anyone? :-)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    8. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      Or drink tea, which contains something that stops your body absorbing caffeine.

      Or...not. Your body will perfectly happily absorb and respond to the caffeine in tea. The perception that tea is only a weak stimulant probably has several sources.

      Some people make really weak tea.

      There are many teas that do not contain appreciable amounts of caffeine. Many 'herbal' teas, for instance. Different types and brands of black and green teas often have very different caffeine content.

      Psychosomatic effects. People in our society are conditioned anticipate a jolt from coffee. Tea in North America is often (unfairly) portrayed, seen, and marketed as a drink for the elderly--and for those weak-kneed Europeans.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    9. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      Not so long ago we ate loads of fried food, fat and sugar, we smoked woodbines, we drank beer and whisky all the time and we didn't die!
      Except for all the people who ate fried foods, fat, sugar, smoked, and drank, and are now dead. Unless you're trying to claim that people who consume those things become immortal...
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    10. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was growing up in Eastern Europe, nobody'd ever heard of pasteurized milk. Americans tend to be really paranoid about bacteria - sometimes that's a good thing, sometimes not. Some of the best cheeses are made from raw milk, but they can't be legally imported into the US. (Fortunately, I have a friend in the business who's willing to bend the law a bit.)

    11. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Gleng · · Score: 1
      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    12. Re:proof the world is going barmy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      Some of the best cheeses are made from raw milk, but they can't be legally imported into the US

      Here in Australia, hypocrisy rules. We are allowed to import raw-milk cheeses from Europe, but we are not allowed to produce them locally. It's something quite a lot of people are bothered about, but governmental idiocy of course prevails.

    13. Re:proof the world is going barmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, well, he did say "not so long ago". Give him a couple more years...

  38. Pointless GMOs? by Espen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We already have several methods for removing caffeine from coffee much more efficiently than this, so what is the point. I would have much more respect for work on GMOs if the scientists concentrated more on areas which would benefit mankind rather than business interests.

    1. Re:Pointless GMOs? by aug24 · · Score: 1
      It's not really a GMO - the journo doesn't know what he's talking about biologically speaking.

      The effect of RNA interference is to stop a particular gene being expressed, without removing or modifying the gene in any way.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:Pointless GMOs? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Also consider that they need not only to get the approval of the producers and consumers, but also of the growers. With a smaller market, would the coffee growers really risk doing this? And would they be willing to change to a genetically modified crop anyhow?
      Many of these countries have rich traditions and pride in their coffee. Kenyan AA and Yemenese mocca (there is no "h" in mocca) isn't the same anymore if the taste changes due to lack of a primary ingredient. I doubt the revolution will happen there.
      Central and South American countries who sell more on price than a specific taste, and are in fierce competition with each other, well, they have less to lose. Also, their primary markets are the home markets plus the US, where price is also the main consideration, and people are used to defaffienated coffee and not too strongly opiniated on just how their coffee should taste.

      If Maxwell House and Nestle can save a penny or two on their decaffed products, sure, they'll go for it. But I doubt it will have much more impact than alcohol-free wine and nicotine-free cigarettes. Too many people consider the caffeine and taste of caffeine part of the overall experience.

    3. Re:Pointless GMOs? by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Damn those guys for trying to make a profit! It must be EVIL businesses only doing this. I'd be much more interested in readying your posts if they weren't anti capitalistic instead of karma whoring of the slasddot left.

      As far as pointless, maybe, but maybe this was a simple one to handle and they learned something doing it. Maybe they will be able to create a better product after this one, or because of the profits from this one.

      I can't stand sheep that get insightful because they don't personally see a use for something. I don't see a use for briefs, so I wear boxers. You don't see me complaining that the evil corporation Hanes and its profit grubbing business interests make briefs even though I don't wear them.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  39. update- internet has changed by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

    I checked again- the internet has changed!!!

    Now it says that tea in its raw form, pound for pound, contains more caffeine than coffee, but because you use less of it to make a cup of tea, and the tea leaves aren't consumed, you end up with a cup of tea having 1/3 to 1/2 of the caffeine in it compared to a cup of coffee.

    graspee

    1. Re:update- internet has changed by Cally · · Score: 1

      I do like the coffee taste, though, so I might experiment with some decaf later on...

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    2. Re:update- internet has changed by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't know about coffee naturally grown to have no or little caffeine, but normal decaff (which has been put through a process to get rid of the caffeine) tastes like shit compared to real coffee.

      graspee

    3. Re:update- internet has changed by Aussie · · Score: 1
      and the tea leaves aren't consumed

      Umm, I don't eat the coffee grounds either.

  40. Why bother posting... by berb · · Score: 0

    this article. The /. crowd is the last democraphic who would ever care about decaffinated coffee.

    1)make decaf coffee beans
    2)brew
    3)fail to PROFIT !!!!

    --
    In teh event of an actual emergency this space might provide useful information.
  41. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can find the time to reduce the caffeine but you can't figure out how to get half the crap out of cigarettes or junk out of fatty foods.

    Gimme something of use to me. Caffeine is the only reason I'm starbucks' bitch.

  42. EVIL BASTARD SCUM MUST DIE by tanguyr · · Score: 1

    Scientists grow decaffeinated coffee plants
    Last Updated Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:17:17
    NARA, JAPAN - Researchers have genetically modified coffee seedlings to produce up to 70 per cent less caffeine. [scientists baaaaaaaaaaaad. caffeine goooooooooood /t]
    The team says demand for decaffeinated coffee is growing worldwide. Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people. [so what? hey, if you can't stand the heat... i dunno, drink tea or something /t]
    Shinjiro Ogita and colleagues at the Nara Institute of Science and Technology [a fatwa on their heads! /t] in Japan used a tool called RNA interference to genetically engineer the one-year-old plants. [oh so they're child molesters as well then?? figures /t]
    Coffee plant cells make caffeine in a three-step process [bless their little souls /t]. The technique silenced an enzyme for the second step.[demand free speech for coffee enzymes! /t]
    "At present, coffee is decaffeinated industrially, but the process is expensive and the flavour of the product is poor [really, you mean coffee with no coffee in it tastes bad? who'd a thunk? /t]â" problems that could potentially be overcome by the genetic engineering of coffee plants," the researchers wrote in Thursday's issue of the journal Nature.
    The taste verdict won't be in until the plants mature in three to four years. The commercial definition of decaffeinated coffee in the U.S. is 97 per cent less caffeine, but geneticists haven't yet attained that level.
    The Japanese team used the robusta variety of coffee plant. Other researchers are trying genetic engineering techniques on the more commercial but slower growing arabica plant. [bet it was pretty tough to achieve this. bet they had to work a lot of nights. /t]

    --
    #!/usr/bin/english
  43. Re:What a concept. by fi-greenie · · Score: 1

    Well, most of the Good Things are unheard of in Finland, anyways. And that has nothing to do with coffee :)

  44. Microsoft - the biggest customer?? by jkrise · · Score: 1

    Real coders need REAL Caffeine (TM). Considering the bloatware that comes from MS, packaged with lesser useful stuff, I guess the developers over there should be the biggest customers for this!

    Seriously, if I wanted less caffeine, I'd drink less coffee! What's all this nonsense about? What next? Bio-engineered hunans to think less, and consume more? Eeekk!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:Microsoft - the biggest customer?? by bsartist · · Score: 2, Funny

      What next? Bio-engineered hunans to think less, and consume more?

      You haven't been to your local mall lately, have you? ;-)

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  45. Whats wrong with current Decaf? by Benm78 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Besides the fact that it lacks caffeine, and tastes mediocre at best, I wonder what the problem is with currect decaf.

    Decaf is nowadays produced by removing caffeine from coffee beans using liquid or supercritical CO2, instead of organic solvents used in the old days. The current process is friendly to the environment (CO2 can easily be recycled), and safe to the consumer as well.

    Personally, I do not object genetic modification of the plants, but I think many people (especially Europeans) do. Decaf is also considered a 'healthy' product, and it might be a bad marketing match to introduce modern biotech there. Furthermore, I doubt it will taste any better, since caffeine itself has a bitter flavor to it that might be important in the taste of 'real' coffee.

    One question remains: Where does the caffeine they currently remove go? And: Will caffeine become more expensive when there are no 'leftovers' from removing it from coffee?

    1. Re:Whats wrong with current Decaf? by CitizenJohnJohn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Warning: coffee tragic at keyboard.

      Short answer: it doesn't taste very good. Even if you're using a good grinder and espresso machine and are a reasonably skilled barista, you can't make espresso or espresso-based drinks from decaf beans that taste as good as ones that start with regular beans. The decaffeination process removes other things from the coffee that go to make up its taste - hardly surprising as a lot of the taste of coffee comes from some fairly light, volatile substances. They don't stick around in the cup for long after espresso is made, so you'd expect them to hitch a ride when the caffeine departs.

      As for 'who would drink GM/engineered decaf?' well, my wife for one. She loves coffee, but gets bad effects from the caffeine if she has more than a couple of cappuccinos a day. Okay, I make them strong (there's a double shot of espresso in any coffee served here) but that's how she and everyone else seems to like them, so that's not about to change. If someone came up with a bean strain that tasted good and had even 50 percent of the caffeine content of regular Arabica, we'd be customers, and I know we wouldn't be alone - the roaster I use sells lots of decaf even though he freely admits it doesn't taste great.

      That's going to be a challenge for the guys doing this research, by the way. Just about any coffee you get served anywhere is made from a blend of different beans, grown in different places to produce a well-rounded, balanced drink. Even, say, 'Colombian' isn't going to be one bean from one estate. This product is initially going to be, in effect, a single-strain, single-estate coffee. Even if GMing out the caffeine leaves everything else alone, the resulting drink could be, ah, interesting...

  46. OK... this must stop! by keli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't get me wrong... I was all for genetic research and modification. I was naive enough to think the scientists would only do ethical stuff, like growing chicken that lay cubic eggs for efficient storage and transportation, and solve the world hunger by engineering better socks.

    But no! They just had to go for us professional nerds and geeks! They just had to attack the foundation of our daily life... this can't continue... research must stop!

    -- :-P

  47. Why not simply outlaw caffeine? by ites · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Ban popular addictive substance
    2. ???
    3. Profit!!

    Coffee is both popular and cheap, so something had to be done about it. Banning the traditional kind and replacing it with a kinder, gentler version is the first step. Bombing coffee-growing regions while turning a blind eye to coffee-lords who grow new hi-grade plants is the next step. Finally, a 25% cut of what is definitely going to be big business...

    Ites' first rule of thumb says "follow the money", and for caffeine-free coffee this seems the only plausible plot. Certainly no-one is actually going to buy the castrated version.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Why not simply outlaw caffeine? by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ban popular addictive substance

      Yeah, that will work. Its not like the colombians have experience smuggling illegal substances into our country...

  48. Re:What a concept. by QuaZar666 · · Score: 1

    well lets see the article is about a scientist in Japan at the Nara Institute of Science and Technology. How exactly is this about America again when the research and design are being done in Japan?

    -Qua

  49. Less profit? by Bueller_007 · · Score: 1

    I thought that when they removed the caffeine from natural (i.e. caffeinated) coffee to make decaf, they sold the caffeine to the soft-drink companies so that they could put it in their colas...Aren't they eliminating a source of profit here? Or do they lose money on the caffeine extraction process?

  50. not necessarily true by lingqi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You might be surprised to hear this, but coffee has became probably THE national drink of Japan. It's really an jaw-dropping thing because people usually have a concept where they are sipping green tea all the time.

    The thing is, though, that they actually seem to genuinely like the stupid beverage (and almost everybody drinks it black - and by almost i mean 99.9% of the people), because they don't really have any perceptable needs for the caffine.

    Being that most everybody is extremely health-conscious here*, it is not surprising that they are making "natural" decaf coffee - or I should say, decaf coffee that has not gone through the decaf cycle (which to many, ruins the taste).

    * there is a dichotomy here - because while many guys goes on diets and somesuch, they are almost always horrible workaholics and a large percentage smokes and drinks like it's going out of style. So, it's almost like hipocritical health consciousness - but hypocritical or not, the demand is still there for the low-caffine beverage.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:not necessarily true by SkArcher · · Score: 3, Troll

      "natural" decaf coffee - or I should say, decaf coffee that has not gone through the decaf cycle (which to many, ruins the taste).

      De-caffeinated coffee ruins the point of drinking coffee, anyone who wants de-caff (or no alcohol beer, or nicotine free cigarettes) should just go and drink orange juice and leave those of us with a serious addiction to it.

      I'm more worried about it cross-polinating with real caffeine plants and diluting my Coding Coffee

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    2. Re:not necessarily true by AgentSmith1000 · · Score: 0

      ha ha. I'm drinking decaf right now.

      I like the potential for a decaf plant. It'll be nice to not have to worry if I'm drinking some other residue with my coffee. And I like my heart to stay in a natural rhythm. I think a more proper statement is: I-don't-want-your-ordinary-caffinated -coffee-plant-next-to-mine.

      BRUN SIGDEFAULT

      I'm #1000 cause I make friends. Literally.
    3. Re:not necessarily true by SubliminalLove · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you get your information. Coffee certainly is popular over here, and I'd say that the majority of adults drink it, but in living over here I haven't found the proportions to be any different than America. That is, for the stated "drink it black" coffee.

      They do, however, have flavored and unflavored coffee-milk blends that are for sale in every convenience store and out of the majority of vending machines. I love 'em; I get enough caffeine to get up in the morning, and they don't give me killer heartburn :)

    4. Re:not necessarily true by Julius+X · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more worried about it cross-polinating with real caffeine plants and diluting my Coding Coffee

      For a moment, I thought that said Codeine Coffee...and half of me instantly wanted to ask where I could get some...

      --

      -Julius X
      remove "-whatkindofspamdoyoutakemefor-" from email to send
    5. Re:not necessarily true by harrkev · · Score: 1
      Being that most everybody is extremely health-conscious here*, it is not surprising that they are making "natural" decaf coffee - or I should say, decaf coffee that has not gone through the decaf cycle (which to many, ruins the taste).


      The most common method of removing the caffeine is to use methyl chloride . I am not sure what this stuff is (too many years since my chemistry class), but the name sounds nasty!

      Can anybody tell me about this chemical???
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    6. Re:not necessarily true by macshit · · Score: 1

      Where are you in Japan? I've lived near Tokyo for 5-6 years, and while lots of people drink coffee, I've almost never seen anyone drink it black, they're always pouring the most god-awful crap into it (e.g., `Creap'), and while I know lots of great places to buy coffee, I find it almost impossible to find decaf (either prepared or beans). Indeed the only reliable source I've found for decaf is Starbucks, and they're not exactly top-quality...

      BTW, `image concious' seems closer to the mark than `health concious.'

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    7. Re:not necessarily true by pmz · · Score: 2, Funny

      You might be surprised to hear this, but coffee has became probably THE national drink of Japan.

      So, between the caffeine and the nicotine, do the Japanese bounce to work?

    8. Re:not necessarily true by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0

      It's really an jaw-dropping thing because people usually have a concept where they are sipping green tea all the time.

      Except a lot of people drink kou-cha (you might call it 'Brown Tea' - tastes like liquified weatbix)... Maybe people in the Ultra Built-up areas are coffeeholics, but wherever I've been, people have been chugging brown tea.

      (Serve it hot, or cold with ice-cubes. Nice. *Grimaces*)

    9. Re:not necessarily true by wondafucka · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Try quitting cold turkey for about three to five months. Have a cup of decaf. It still gets your heart racing.

      I'm sure there is someone out there wondering what the point of coffee is when there is esspresso.

      Look at tea. There are vastly differing levels of caffeine in the different types of tea. Why not let the same be true for coffee.

      Why should you care what someone else drinks, or how it affects your image of what the drink should be.

    10. Re:not necessarily true by dacarr · · Score: 1

      If I drink decaf though, it's because of social reasons and that I don't want to go to sleep at 2:00 AM rather than 11:00 PM like is normal for me. IOW, it comes down to one thing: "Decaf coffee? ...why?"

      --
      This sig no verb.
    11. Re:not necessarily true by L0rdJagged · · Score: 1

      Hot cans from vending machines, that is the best thing in the world. I am going to miss those...

    12. Re:not necessarily true by Catnapster · · Score: 1
      BTW, `image concious' seems closer to the mark than `health concious.'
      So, how is that different from America?
      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    13. Re:not necessarily true by Snowdog668 · · Score: 1

      And here I am trying to figure out what the effect would be. Codeine puts me to sleep, while coffee keeps me awake. I don't think it would be a net 0 equation... It would be interesting to see which has a stronger effect.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    14. Re:not necessarily true by jakobk · · Score: 1

      They use carbon dioxide now.

    15. Re:not necessarily true by harrkev · · Score: 1
      They use carbon dioxide now.


      Carbon dioxide is one of the ways being used now. It is newer and "better," but apparently not everybody is using. Look at http://www.heritage-coffee.com/the_genesis_of_deca f.htm.

      If you look at http://www.coffee-resources.com/chapter.asp?chapte r_ID=52, they will decaffinate your own beans for you! They either use methyl chloride or ethyl acetate. There are more details here (google cache).

      If you go here, you see that:
      Methylene chloride is used as an industrial solvent and as a paint stripper.
      YIKES! Although other sited say that:
      1) All of the methyl chloride is washed out in the process.
      2) Methyl chloride turns to a gas (and supposedly escapes the bean) at a temperature WAY below the temperature that beans are roasted.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    16. Re:not necessarily true by macshit · · Score: 1

      So, how is that different from America?

      Well I never claimed it was, I just think the original poster's description of Japanese in general as being very `health concious' seemed flat-out bizarre.

      However, I will say that while the majority of Americans wouldn't know healthy from a hole in the head, there's a large minority that actually do think (er, obsess...?) about health issues, and this group has had some effect on the general awareness. To be sure, the result is often twisted and bizarre (99% fat-free bags of sugar!), but well, at least smoking is on its way out (whereas smoking is still one of Japan's most offensive habits)...

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  51. oh no.. by tewmten · · Score: 0

    this doesn't help me at all..
    can't those hawaiian guys make a coffee bean with _more_ caffeine? That would reall help mankind :-)

  52. SCOffeeeeeeeeee!!!!! by jkrise · · Score: 1

    SCOffee contains 70% lesser caffeine, much like SCOde which is 70% junk!
    Drinking SCOffee makes people SCOff at you.

    Next research item:
    SCOrn : Normal Corn with 99.99% chaff and .01% stuff.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  53. COFFEE MAKES YOU STRONG! STRENGTH CRUSHES ENEMIES by Simon+Kongshoj · · Score: 4, Funny
    Caffeine can trigger palpitations, increase blood pressure and disrupt sleep in sensitive people

    Cool! Are there any side effects?

    --
    Six sick .sigs, the Number of the Beast!
  54. Info About Coffee by bace · · Score: 5, Informative
    Firstly Coffee is the second most traded comodity, behind oil.

    The way most coffee is decafinated these days is with a process called the "Swiss water method".
    This involves soaking unroasted coffee beans in water. The water absorbs the coffee flavor and the caffine.
    These beans are then trown out, the water is filtered of caffine, and only caffine. To do this the water is pased through a carbon filter.
    The result is decaf coffee flavoured water. This water is used to soak a new batch of beans. Scince the water is super saturated with coffee flavour, it cannot abosorb any more flavour, but it can still absorb caffine. So the caffine is removed from the beans whilst keeping the flavour. The water is used for about 3 batches then the whole process starts again with new water.

    The extra steps involved in decafinating coffee is what makes it a bit more expensive. So next time you have a decaf coffee, just think of all the steps involved to make it that way. Ohh by the way, coffee needs do be 97% free of caffine to be called decaf.

    If you want to know how i know all this, i help roast coffee for Gloria Jeans

    --
    =If life was easy, i would be out of a job=
    1. Re:Info About Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should bottle this super-caffeinated water and sell it to the /. crowd.

  55. Unemployement? by maliabu · · Score: 1

    with this naturally-decafed coffee, corporates won't need too many workers anymore, where do they go?

    maybe working for companies that might be producing turbo-charged coffee, ie caffeinating decaffeinated coffee?

    GE GONE MAD!

  56. Heathens! by jonnystiph · · Score: 1

    But of stinking heathens I tell you.

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  57. But Why? Why? Why? by LazloToth · · Score: 2, Insightful



    How about they come up with a Kona plant that grows to maturity in your back yard in less than one month?

    --


    It's only funny until someone gets hurt. Then, it's hilarious.
  58. LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Funny

    LOL IM A PROGRAMMER LOL I DRINK COFFEE LOL CAFFEINE LOL DONT COME TO CLOSE LOL I HAVE THE SHAKES AND MIGHT SNAP ROFL I HAVENT HAD MY MORNING CUP OF COFFEE LOL

    Unfortunatly, I've met more imaginative heroin addicts.

    I fucking hate this caffeine gimmick, it's not that hard to stay up late when coding, or make it to work in the morning without bending over for caffeine.

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish. I used to think like you untill 2 weeks ago when I slowed my caffeine intake from 10-12 cups/day to 2 per day.... It took a week for my body to well, say screw this sh*t.. I want my caffeine back.
      If you drink coffee on regular basis is damn hard to stop. Really damn hard.
      If you just have a cup once in a while (less than 1 a day) then your comment almost make sense.

      BTW. you are insenstive clod

    2. Re:LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: quitting caffeine cold-turkey when you drink 10-12 cups of coffee a day is a Stupid Idea (quitting from 2 cups per day is manageable, but 10-12 will give you horrible withdrawal, as you have no doubt observed first-hand), and drinking that much to begin with can't be terribly healthy.
      That often-ridiculed idea of gradually decreasing your caffeine intake (for example, by 1-2 cups/day each week) might actually work.

      BTW. if anyone's an insensitive clod around here, it's you.

    3. Re:LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 1

      You missed my point. I don't drink coffee, and I only drink caffeine free coke, and I doubt you ever used to think like me! I was parodying people like you!

      I goto Uni in the morning, all the lecturers are fapping over their morning 3 cups of coffee, the one when they wake up, the one in the car (with their nice shiny coffee travel mug. Shit, Thinkgeek even has a fucking section totally devoted to caffeine.) and then the one in the lecture, not to mention however many other cups they have through the day.

      It was a case of 'rinse and repeat' whenever I went to work too.. "caffeine, caffeine.. I can't possibly work a second later without my liquid gold" or whatever other 'witty' name the waste of skin had come up with!

      It's like a lifestyle choice for the terminally crap!

      BTW. you are an oversensitive drug addict. If you can't go cold turkey, cut down by one cup a day for a week, then drop another cup the next week etc, or use less coffee! Shit 10 cups of coffee a day has got to be bad for you!

      --
      The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    4. Re:LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by sharkey · · Score: 1
      ...make it to work in the morning without bending over for caffeine.

      Put the coffee pot on the counter like I do. Keeps me from having to bend over for my caffeine.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:LOLOLOL COFFEE IS MY LIFE BLOOD LOLLOLOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man that's fucking funny. Thanks.

  59. Caffeine free is the way... by erf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously, ditching caffeine last year has had many benefits: more energy, better concentration, easier time sleeping, and more restful sleep. Plus no frantic lunges for the mug when those caffeine deprivation headaches set in.

    These days I'll brew up strong decaf (to make up for the flavor loss from decaffeination), herbal tea (roibos, yum), and decaf black tea. I save those wonderful espressos, cappuccinos, etc. for those times when I'm terribly exhausted, at which point the caffeine has a big big effect since the addiction's gone. Or I'll drink a mate for a similar kick.

  60. A small joke by Daath · · Score: 1

    A man walked into a restaurant and seated himself. Soon, the waitress came over to take his order, "...and to drink?" she asked. The man said he would like coffee.

    The waitress promptly returned with a cup of coffee, but spilled it on the man's lap when she stopped at the table. "Oh my god, I am so sorry!"

    "That's OK," the man said sopping up the puddle on his pants with his a napkin. "But tell me, is this regular or decaf?"

    "Regular," she replied.

    "Oh great, now this thing is going to be up all night!"

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  61. i need to go shopping again. by agent+dero · · Score: 1

    I guess this means I need more Caffeine Pills to put in my coffee now, how am I ever going to get work done without my Caffeinated Coffee?

    I guess i'll have to give heroin a try, I hear it works better anyways.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
    1. Re:i need to go shopping again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I guess i'll have to give heroin a try, I hear it works better anyways.
      Heroin is a downer {think melting into the floor, needing a pee but absolutely laking the motivation to get up and not really caring and that's the best bit}, caffeine is an upper {think running around, hyper, talking bollox all night}. If you really want to substitute another addictive substance for caffeine, try amphetamine sulphate {speed / whizz / fet}. It's water-soluble, so you could add it to de-caff coffee if you wanted to be totally irresponsible. It can also be inhaled or injected into vein or muscle. Less than half the amphetamine enters the bloodstream when snorted or swallowed; this is probably A Good Thing as intravenous speed use is considered highly addicting. Swallowing probably is least likely addicting.

      Ritalin {prescribed for hyperactive kids} is a mild upper chemically related to amphetamine {No, I don't understand why give hyper kids uppers either}. It also has addictive potential, but certainly less so than intravenous speed.
    2. Re:i need to go shopping again. by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      Ritalin {prescribed for hyperactive kids} is a mild upper chemically related to amphetamine {No, I don't understand why give hyper kids uppers either}.

      The effects of stimulants and depressants on behaviour are counterintuitive. Stimulants give you energy but make you more reflective, depressants decrease energy but lessen inhibition. If you want to know why they give hyperactive kids an upper think what would happen if you fed them a well known downer called alcohol.

    3. Re:i need to go shopping again. by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah ..... I remember now. The first thing alcohol knocks out is the sense of inhibition. I guess the Ritalin must cause some beneficial effect before it starts on enhancing the undesirable ones.

      I really must take a week off and remind myself of these things!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  62. Now I finally have something... by Mr.+Smoove · · Score: 1

    ...to put on my decafinated coffee table!

    --
    Mr. Smoove
  63. Decaffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that whoever drinks too much decaffeine, is going to die some day.

  64. What is the point? by flea69 · · Score: 1

    The whole purpose of drinking coffee is to get the marginal high from the caffine, it keeps you going when the going gets rough.

    In a related story scientists are working on THC free Cannibis...and oxygen-free air.

  65. very good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a coder, and I drink too much coffee. If I can get a decaf coffee that tastes good, maybe I can ween myself off the real thing.

    I reckon in 20 years, caffeine will be up there with nicotine.

  66. It's hardly Genetic Modification by aug24 · · Score: 1
    RNS interference is not really GM - it's a technique that knocks out a single gene's activity, but leaves the gene sequence intact.

    If you bred from these genes, the offspring plants would be caffeine producing.

    J.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:It's hardly Genetic Modification by RDW · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they are GM - the plant cells (in the form of a 'callus') weren't just treated with RNAi, they were modified by permanently inserting a construct that expresses the appropriate RNAi (designed to repress a gene necessary for caffeine synthesis). They then used these cells to produce seedlings with reduced caffeine content which (assuming the insert is stable) will pass this property on to their offspring (even though, as you say, the original gene is still intact).

    2. Re:It's hardly Genetic Modification by aug24 · · Score: 1
      Where did you get that from? [I did read the story, did I miss something?] I assumed it was a treatment with RNA or siRNA to knock out the gene expression but leave the gene. If not, can you tell me what exactly is the 'construct' you describe?

      I still don't understand that you're describing a change to the DNA here though, so I still don't see how it's to be considered GM.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    3. Re:It's hardly Genetic Modification by meiocyte · · Score: 1

      The linked story doesn't make it clear at all..but the article in Nature does:

      (from figure 1 legend):

      "Short RNAi fragments (RNAi-S) were constructed using 139-base-pair (bp; corresponding
      to nucleotide positions 1,139â"1,277) and 161-bp (positions
      1,117â"1,277) sequences of CaMXMT1 (GenBank accession number
      AB048794), with an intervening 517-bp b-glucuronidase ( GUS)
      fragment as spacer; long RNAi fragments (RNAi-L) contained two
      identical sequences of 332 bp (positions 946â"1,277) separated by a
      517-bp GUSfragment. The resulting constructs were inserted into a
      pBIH1-IG vector7; the control construct contained a green fluorescent
      protein gene ( GFP)."

      then the vector was put into Agrobacterium, which infects plant cells, putting a piece of its own DNA into the plant's chromosome. This piece of DNA usually contains virulence genes, but you can replace those with any gene you want. Actually, the letter in Nature is very short on details, but leaves no question that these plants are, in fact, transgenic:

      "More than 35 transgenic somatic seedlings
      were obtained from each transformant,
      each containing short or long RNAi
      fragments or a control gene encoding green
      fluorescent protein (GFP)."

      Also, they didn't transform the normal coffee plant (Coffea arabica), but a close relative (C. canephora)..but they're working on the real thing now.

      --
      The thing in the box has no place in the language-game at all; not even as a something; for the box might even be empty.
    4. Re:It's hardly Genetic Modification by aug24 · · Score: 1
      You're absolutely right. My bad.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  67. Cha Ching!!! by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 1
    This is all about money. Not only could the researchers possibly benefit from this (though it's quite doubtful - the only way they could really profit from this would be if they left the institute they're at and started a private company. However, the institute could patent it and make some major cash), as well as the coffee companies because of the demand. But don't forget, this could significantly lower the cost of making decaffinated coffee, as less would have to be extracted from the coffee grounds.

    On a scientific note, it is a nice demonstration of the growing potential for the use of RNA interference for knocking down the expression of specific genes. I'm not sure how much this has been done in plants, but it's really been taking off in mammalian cells in the last year or two.

  68. Yep, I guess you're right! by w.p.richardson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've never eaten a "navel orange"!

    Or a "seedless watermelon"!

    Or any of those monstrous "seedless grapes"!

    Or, God forbid, monstrosities such as "broccoflower"!

    Honestly, you people who use the term "frankenfood" have absolutley no clue what you are talking about. Get a remedial education about what you actually do eat, then come back!

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

    1. Re:Yep, I guess you're right! by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Honestly, you people who use the term "frankenfood" have absolutley no clue what you are talking about.

      If you have ever eaten corn, or any product based thereon, then you have no clue what you are talking about. Modern corn is so modified by selective breeding that it couldn't even reproduce without our intervention, and most of this process took place before we knew what DNA was.

      And that's just assuming you are a vegetarian. Have you ever seen a herd of wild chicken or cows?

      Ever since the Agricultural Revolution, pretty much all of our food is frankenfood, regardless of whether or not it comes in an unbleached container.

    2. Re:Yep, I guess you're right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen wild cows, and sheep, and yes even chickens.

  69. Re:caffeine free coffee ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    As troll-like as it seems it's not particularly offtopic. Monsanto is one of the world's biggest producers of genetically modified plants, and often has a nasty way of sneaking them into places through backdoors.

  70. "think different" by mirko · · Score: 1

    You'd better try something else : I used to drink too much coffee too, then I tried Green Tea (healthy if not abused), but also light milk (calcium = good), pineapple juice (as bitter as coffee, but harmless)...

    Now my point is you'd better drink something else, instead of what's endangering your health.

    Also, by tasting different things, you'll discover new ways to become more open-minded, so this advice is also worth receiving in other concept.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  71. In other news... by nmg196 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists have also found a way to remove Dihydrogen Monoxide from water in a process called "deaquificiation".

  72. This is soooo wrong by confused+one · · Score: 1
    Am I the only one here who thinks this is wrong? The entire thought of *gasp* decaf coffee sickens me. They should be working to make the coffee stronger! Whomever funded the research needs to be boycotted... What were they thinking??? This is clearly the work of the Devil! I can't believe *sniff* that they would hurt a poor coffee tree *sniff sniff* like that. That poor little innocent tree.

    rant over *twitch* *twitch* Must go find more coffee, cup empty. Must find...

    1. Re:This is soooo wrong by confused+one · · Score: 1
      talking to myself again....

      read rest of thread. Not alone. Others believe as I. This good... Mmmmm coffee. Coffee good.

  73. Wally by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wally has so much caffine in his system that he can "coast" for a few minutes.

    However, look at it like this: the Pointy Haired Boss is also down, so there may be good to come out of this....

    1. Re:Wally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The boss is dead? Half day!

  74. Headlines I want to see..... by JaJ_D · · Score: 3, Funny

    In stead of "Scientists Grow Decaffeinated Coffee Plants" I want ot see headlines like...:-

    Scientists Grow caffeinated Coffee Plants with 50% more Caffine

    or

    Scientist grow a Jolt Cola Plant

    or

    Scientist grom a Caffine/Pizza combo plant

    Why _less_ caffine??

    Jaj

  75. No coffee @ 5:00 AM by Thyamine · · Score: 1

    From what I can see, this was posted at 5:00 AM. There had to be some coffee-enhanced skills going on to be posting that early. =)

    --
    I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  76. Maybe good, maybe not... by xmda · · Score: 1
    I don't drink coffe. I seldom drink tea. I sometimes drink Coke. So my caffeine intake is quite low.

    Anyway, last year I read in a book about the pros and cons of caffeine, and when listed next to each other it felt like it did not matter. As I understood it, it can actually be good for some people, but probably really bad for some, it all depends.

    But I guess that there beeing a choice between normal coffe and decaf can only be good thing.

  77. Everythings bad for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fast food, smoking, coffee, etc. Soon, I suppose, there will be warning labels on coffee, and we'll be forced to drink this decaffinated stuff.

  78. Re: coworkers by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
    I'm all for decaf. At least for my co-workers.

    If you absolutely need to hyphenate that word, the correct way is 'cow-orkers'.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  79. More Fantastic Inventions... by ites · · Score: 1, Funny

    - Whiskey with no alcohol
    - Pot with no THC
    - Computers that run at 25 Mhz
    - Cars that max at 30 km/h
    - Sex without orgasms
    - Parachute jumping from 5 ft
    - Motorbikes with roofs and no wheels
    - Rubber knives
    - Porn involving ugly people
    - Half-sized beds
    - IM limited to 1 message per day
    - Headless hammers
    - Private blogs
    - Silent music
    - Opera with skinny people
    - Bars with no beer
    - Ladders with 1 rung
    - 3.5v mains power
    - Cold fire
    - Black glass

    Uhm. What... is... the... point...? Beer without the alcohol is just horse urine, and coffee without caffeine is just dark bitter hot horse urine.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:More Fantastic Inventions... by Pastor+Fluff · · Score: 1

      Uhm. What... is... the... point...? Beer without the alcohol is just horse urine, and coffee without caffeine is just dark bitter hot horse urine.

      And sex without orgasms is just... uhm... marriage.
      --
      Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble... can't we just go to Starbuck's for coffee?
    2. Re:More Fantastic Inventions... by ites · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I don't understand, you mean there is still supposed to be SEX? I am going to try this tonight, for sure! And now I understand why the wife always tries to get me to drink decaf. It's all coming together.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  80. Re:What a concept. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? How many decades has decafinated instant coffee been around? Checks kitchen, yup, there it is.

  81. Decaffeinated coffee? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

    Bah, humbug! Decaffeinated coffee is for pussies and americans!

    Seriously, what's the point? I guess next big thing will be non-alcoholic alcohol.

    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  82. Noo! by Omicron · · Score: 1

    My god...this is just evil.

    Imagine...these plants start cross breeding with our legitimate plants, next thing you know things get out of hand and THEN!!! No Caffeinated Plants ANYWHERE!! AAAAAaaaaggghhhh!!!!

  83. end the madness by Frogg · · Score: 1

    >>Scientists Grow Decaffeinated Coffee Plants

    cut the plants down, burn them, and kill those responsible for this madness - this kind of thing simply shouldn't be allowed to happen in a sane world!! ;o)

  84. Just for reference: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Gene silencing of this nature in plants is generally referred to as PTGS or Post-Transcriptional Gene Silencing. More recently, as the phenomenon has been observed in organisms from yeast -> humans, it has been renamed RNAi for RNA interference.

  85. Re:caffeine free coffee ? by uncoveror · · Score: 1

    Arabica coffee has half thae caffeine of robusta coffee to start with, so if you drink gormet coffee, and not the stale, pre-ground shiat in a can, you already are much better off. Most people who get tense or get the shakes from drinking coffee are drinking the cheap stuff. You know what else? Arabica coffee is the original coffee plant. Robusta is a hybrid, designed to deliver higher yields, grown in a wider variety of climates, and be resistant to disease. Too bad it tastes like shiat, and is overloaded with caffeine. Want to learn more? Here are some links. http://www.sweetmarias.com/ http://www.coffeebeancorral.com/

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  86. It's risky enough anyway... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

    "He's already unconscious - decaf could kill him! Still, it's worth a try..." - Bernard Bernoulli, attempting to revive Dr. Fred Edison

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  87. hypo... by buddha42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A lot of people point to nicotine or alcohol when referencing how hypocritical marijuana laws are, but I have to say caffine is my favorite. Especially with the recent explosion of 'energy' drinks. It reallys strikes home to just about damn near everyone. Which of course does not make them change their mind... noooo... drugs are bad and used by terrorists.

    Ask this question of the next coffe drinker you see: "Can you get by a day at work without using mind-altering chemicals? If not, howcome I can't relax in the afternoon with mine?"

  88. benefits of caffeine by calethix · · Score: 1

    I once saw something on tv where they had to doctors/researchers debating this. One was arguing that caffeine was bad for all of it's addictive and negative health effects. The other was saying that it was good because it helps people stay alert and get more done. Anyway that's not the point of my post. The funny thing about it was that the pro-caffeine guy seemed all happy and excited while the anti-caffeine guy seemed much more down and monotone, almost like he was drugged with sedatives compared to the other guy. :)

    Personally, I hate coffee (and mountain dew)... some geek I am huh?

  89. Forget functionality, I want taste! by Kvan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why is it that all the new crops I hear about are all about functionality? It's decaf this, Roundup-ready that, when the number one priority for food products should be taste.

    I hope their new bean has a unique and interesting taste; if so, I'll definitely be buying it--caffeine or not. But these guys shouldn't be focusing on caffeine, they should be trying to produce a coffee bean that can be grown easily in many regions, yet tastes as good as Jamaica Blue Mountain. They should be making coffees that taste more like chocolate, or like orange or like a thousand other things.

    --

    "A *person* is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it."
    - 'K' in Men in Black.

    1. Re:Forget functionality, I want taste! by johndiii · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, better taste is much less likely to make money for the producer, unless it is a radical improvement. This example, for instance, would allow coffee producers to eliminate a fairly costly step in the production of decaf coffee. Will the price go down? Unlikely, which means instant profits for the coffee companies. This stuff will probably be patented, as well, so the availability will be restricted to those willing to pay.

      Look at tomatoes, as well. "Regular" tomatoes in the supermarket are mealy and bland. We now have vine-ripened tomatoes (started appearing 5-10 years ago, I think, at about twice the cost), which are somewhat better. They are still a pale shadow of the taste of a home garden-grown tomato. Your "tomato experience" :-) has been driven by the shippability of the tomatoes, not the taste.

      Most people just buy things that don't taste bad; they don't actively seek out things that taste good. I do, but I think that you and I are relatively unusual. The result is that taste is driven toward the average - not bad, but not good.

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
  90. Re:COFFEE MAKES YOU STRONG! STRENGTH CRUSHES ENEMI by MouseR · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are there any side effects?

    Annoying all-caps titles.

  91. One question.. by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Why?

  92. It would have been quicker... by bmac · · Score: 3, Funny

    just to invent a nontoxic brown magic marker for your teeth.

    Manually implemented sigs are of unlimited length...

  93. Better option... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I drink water instead of coffee....

  94. Its like in JP by rosewood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We moved so fast to see if we could, nobody asked if we should!

  95. Decaf genes by SlashDread · · Score: 1

    I suppose if Europe complains about the all-decaf beans, resulting from cross-pollination, the Americans will point out that the thirld world is now a happy coffee consumer, so we should shut up?

    Gr Dread

  96. please... no. by scottking · · Score: 1

    i'm gonna get placebo'd i just know it.

    --
    scott king
  97. More Caffeine? by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    Okay if it works one way...

    Can it work in another to create super coffee plants?

    The slogan can be:

    "Who needs speed just slam back a cup of WAMMMO brand coffee"

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
  98. Coffee is yummy by Kernel+Kludge · · Score: 1
    I'm a little surprised at how much outrage such a simple thing has caused. Granted, most of it is simply humorous (like this particular thread) but some of these messages are really creepy. My advice: cut back. :-)

    You may be surprised that some people can most often regulate their sleep patterns naturally but that they actually like the flavor of coffee. I regard anything to preserve the flavor a step in the right direction.

    1. Re:Coffee is yummy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Funny
      some people can most often regulate their sleep patterns naturally but that they actually like the flavor of coffee.

      I'm a biotech student, and as such genetic modification is hardly anathema to me;

      BUT DON'T FUCK WITH MY DAMN COFFEE!

      And yes, I actually do like the taste of it (at least the stuff I make). I would be curious to find out if this new stuff tasted any good...

    2. Re:Coffee is yummy by rnws · · Score: 1
      Too goddamn right!

      Designer babies, bioweapons, cloning, who cares! Where the hell is the ethics in this!?!

      Can you imagine if these plants out-competed the natural verions? My god man! Mass global caffeiene withdrawl!! Total chaos!



      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    3. Re:Coffee is yummy by junkgrep · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's likely to taste a lot better than regular decaf. To MAKE decaf coffee, they have to basically destroy the flavor of the bean. If this plant actually works, then hopefully they can use untouched high-quality beans for decaf.

    4. Re:Coffee is yummy by neobuddhist · · Score: 1

      Man, if it actually tastes like real coffee and you can't tell, I can just imagine how many people would pull the old "replace the normal coffee at work with decaf for two weeks and then switch it to espresso roast" prank.

      --
      "Each day is better than the next" - My future father in law
    5. Re:Coffee is yummy by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
      Someone actually did this to me once. I found out when I drunk my first cup from it. Naturally, I went out and bought some real coffee, and blasted that person on the spot.

      Like other slashdotters, I think this is quite evil. Don't take my caffeine away from me. It's what makes me function like a human being in the morning.

      But I doubt that many americans will notice. They percolate, which is the most evil thing you can do to a brew. Takes all the flavour away. Yuck.

    6. Re:Coffee is yummy by Oaktree_b · · Score: 1

      BUT DON'T FUCK WITH MY DAMN COFFEE! Amen buddy. Certain things in life you don't mess with, Coffee is one. Not sure what the other one's are yet...

      --
      ------ Will of Iron, Knees of Jello.
  99. Pest Control Problem? by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing somewhere that plants produce caffeine as a natural pesticide. Without caffeine, does this mean that more artificial pesticide will have to be used on the coffee plants? Any idea what environmental effect this might have?

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  100. Not a bad thing in my opinion by mtnbkr · · Score: 1

    I drink coffee more for the flavor than the effect (I rarely drink soda). I started cutting back on my coffee intake recently because it was jacking up my blood pressure (I'm only 30yo and moderately active, I shouldn't have high BP). I cut back to two cups a day and my BP is back to normal. Still, I'd like to sip on a warm cup of coffee all day long, but I can't stand most decaf'd coffee, so I simply do without. Something that is naturally decaff'd and still tastes good would be a godsend.

    Chris

  101. Let me get this straight... by sirgoran · · Score: 1

    They actually WANT coffee without caffeine?
    And these "scientists" call themselves geeks. How can any self-respecting geek further the satanic cause of the Anti-Coffee?

    I do everything I can to NOT go near the Anti-Coffee.

    To quote the Bart; "Bart no like!"

    Give me Coffee, or give me Jolt Cola. But keep your bland, non-caffeinated fluid to yourself.

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
  102. They've got it backwards... by Bohnanza · · Score: 1

    What we need is EXTRA-caffeinated coffee.

    --

    -----

    Sorry, I'm only a 1336 h4x0r.

  103. Look up "Horizontal Gene Transfer" by Jonathan · · Score: 1


    Breeding is not equal to genetical engineering. There is no way to do transgenetic breeding, iow. to introduce genes from one species into another species by breeding


    It is well known that genes move across species through entirely natural processes. Trans-species viruses pick up and deposit genes, as many cells can take up DNA directly. Really, read about horizontal gene transfer -- it's one of the most interesting things in molecular evolution. And when the HGT happens in gamates, it can spread just like any other gene. Greenpeace (and maybe your pastor) may not like to hear this, but it is just the way nature works.

    That being said, it is easy to exaggerate the amount of HGT. Paralogy (the loss of a gene in one lineage and conservation in another) can cause similar results to HGT.

    1. Re:Look up "Horizontal Gene Transfer" by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      I know about HGT. You could have even mentioned normal viruses, because they inject their own DNA into foreign cells.

      The problem is, as you stated yourself, that HTG is very rare, injection in gametes is even more so. It comes down to the frequency of changes to the gene pool of a particular species; GE changes this frequency from milennia to years.

      Nobody knows where these sped up changes will lead the species in question, and what the effects of this will be on the biotope. What we do know is that natural evolution can't save us if things go wrong (because it's much to slow).

  104. Bubba Says by Arbogast_II · · Score: 2, Funny

    They are evil sinners, and will suffer horrible tortures in the afterlife!!! They are but Tools of Satan to remove caffeine from the Coffee Shrub!!! Makes me sooooo angry!!! If I hadn't traded in my Hunting Rifle for a Hunting Camara, there lives would be in danger!!!

    --


    HenryJamesFeltus.com
    1. Re:Bubba Says by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1

      If your butchery of the english languages is anything to go by, it looks like they dodged a major bullet there.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
  105. yech... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decaf - what a joke... I mean *WHY*?... Anyway, I digress... What I want to know is how do I GM the plant to produce 2-10x as much caffeine as a regular plant?

    Bolt Coffee - you'll be throwing PVC's or we'll double your money back!

  106. Now here is a reason to BAN by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    genetics!. Just image , oh the humanity, if this got into the wild and, gasp, BECAME THE DOMINAT COFFEE !!! AHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  107. Decaffeinated Coffee... by Colonel+Blimp · · Score: 1

    ...is like a good looking nun, what's the point?

  108. I was going to submit this... by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    But I couldn't come up with a way to do it without being hostile to the idea. So I'll be hostile to the idea in a post instead. I mean sure people with heart conditions who can't kick the cuppa habit will love this, but coffee's a topic I can get worked up about. So if this shit escapes into the wild and drops the caffeine content of my high octane cuppa, I swear on all that is holy that I will assemble a mob the likes of which even Frankenstein never saw.

    They can appease my anger by whipping up a super high octane version, too.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  109. Good God, Are You Mad! by Sean6 · · Score: 1

    They're insane!

  110. Who drinks coffee for the taste? by crashnbur · · Score: 1
    Last I checked, most people who drink coffee drink it for the caffeine, not the taste. Those who drink decaffeinated coffee, it seems, drink it in social situations when it is simply superficially a socially acceptable thing to do. Notice the usage of the word "seems"; appearances could be deceiving.

    Great taste or less filling?

    1. Re:Who drinks coffee for the taste? by Dolohov · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Coffee tastes great. It smells great, too. Most people drink bad coffee for the caffiene, but the fact that coffee ice cream (with nearly undetectable levels of caffiene) sells so well should demonstrate that people do indeed like the taste.

    2. Re:Who drinks coffee for the taste? by crashnbur · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree completely. I love coffee. But it seems to be an acquired taste. I don't think people would like it nearly as much without the caffeine, but since it's always had caffeine, it's impossible to know that.

  111. New Starbuck's Menu Item by flea69 · · Score: 1

    Cafe Mocha NoCaffino w/ a double shot of LittleOrNoTasto.....$7.50

  112. My Life With The Caffiene Free Kult by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to drink about 4 cans of soda and a pot of coffee every day. Cup of coffee and two cigarettes were my breakfast. Caffiene was my lifeblood, but when I decided to quit smoking, I decided that I would be no chemical's bitch. Further, in a fit of masochism, I decided I would get the asshole out of my system all at once, so on the same day, caffiene & nicotine left my life and withdrawal entered it.

    I was expecting that getting rid of cigarettes would make me feel better, and it did. My heart stopped pounding, my sense of smell returned, my lung capacity increased, all the things I was led to believe.

    What I was not expecting was that quitting caffiene made me feel even better.

    I slept better, I woke up with more energy and felt more lively throughout my day. I quit having headaches on the weekends when I decide to sleep late. I found that a 15-minute cat-nap at around five o'clock would let me stay up until two in the morning without any serious repercussions.

    In short, in the eighteen months since I gave it up, I have never once considered going back. Giving up caffiene is maybe the best health decision I have ever made.

    But, I still love the taste of coffee. I spent years acquiring the taste, and I didn't give up that taste just because I gave up caffiene. Decaf fits my needs. It's got less caffiene than a chocolate bar, and still tastes like coffee. I can get my unleaded and drink it, too.

    Now, if they could make caffiene-free coke not suck, I'd be in business.

    Living without caffiene is a bit like having TiVO. You have to stop yourself from evangelizing to the people around you constantly, lest you alienate everyone by not shutting up about how great it is.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    1. Re:My Life With The Caffiene Free Kult by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      Now, if they could make caffiene-free coke not suck, I'd be in business.

      Caffine is an additive in soft-drinks, not a component of a critical ingrediant. Its not that they need to put caffine in soft-drinks, it that they want to put caffine in soft-drinks.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    2. Re:My Life With The Caffiene Free Kult by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      True, but it also effects the flavor. Caffiene-free coke and caffienated coke do taste a bit different.

      Caffiene-free coke doesn't have the same bite to offset all the sweet. I tried drinking it for a while, but it just didn't fly.

      I REALLY miss coke.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
    3. Re:My Life With The Caffiene Free Kult by SagSaw · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, caffine does not affect the taste. I don't want to sound like a consipiricy theoist here, but it wouldn't surprise me if soft-drink makers intentionally make caffine-free recipes less appealing. After all, it kind of renders useless the advantages of caffinating your drinks if everyone is happy with the non-caffinated version.

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    4. Re:My Life With The Caffiene Free Kult by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 1

      preaching to the choir. However it's done, though, I can still tell the difference in a blind taste test.

      --
      Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  113. Completely wrong by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    There is no way to do transgenetic breeding, iow. to introduce genes from one species into another species by breeding.

    You're wrong. This occurs commonly in plants:


    "Another type of polyploid species, much more common than autopolyploids, is called an allopolyploid, referring to the contribution of two different species to a polyploid hybrid. The potential origin of an allopolyploid begins when two different species interbreed and combine their chromosomes. Interspecific hybrids are usually sterile because the haploid set of chromosomes from one species cannot pair during meiosis with the haploid set from another species. Though infertile, a hybrid may actually be more vigorous than its parents and propagate itself asexually (which many plants can do). At least two mechanisms, illustrated in Figure 22.10b, can transform the sterile hybrids into fertile polyploids."

    - Campbell, Neil. Biology, 4th ed.


    Viruses can also transfer genes between species naturally.

    1. Re:Completely wrong by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      Read my other posts. I know there is HGT going on, but you don't selectively breed using HGT.

      To indicate the difference between GE and breeding once again: I would like to see the first breeder who succeeds in crossing a plant with an insect, but I'm not holding my breath. We are talking species from different biological kingdoms here.

  114. Boffins? by inertia187 · · Score: 1

    Boffins? I always thought it was Bothins, as in "...many Bothins died to bring us this information...".

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    1. Re:Boffins? by Nix0n · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the brits are almost as arrogant as we are, assuming the world revolves around them. for those who don't speak British English, a boffin is:

      n. Chiefly British Slang

      A scientist, especially one engaged in research.

    2. Re:Boffins? by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

      I just assumed it was a result of the /. spell check and read it as buffoons. Or, it could be this definition from http://www.dictionary.com

      A district and administrative region of eastern Nunavut, Canada, including Baffin Island, the Queen Elizabeth and Parry islands, and Melville Peninsula.

      However, since they are in Japan, this seems unlikely. But, this is /. so not totally out of the realm of believability.

      --

      Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  115. Re:COFFEE MAKES YOU STRONG! STRENGTH CRUSHES ENEMI by strike2867 · · Score: 1

    According to previous posts, you will be destroying your enemies with a hardon, and a lot of twitching.

    --

    Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  116. GM and stuff by baloogan · · Score: 1

    This is one of the reasions that I don't support modifying of things...

  117. Where does the caffeine go? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
    I believe it is used in pharmeceuticals and as a food additive (e.g. to Coke). In fact, I believe that's why decaf and regular coffee are the same price - the cost of extracting the caffeine is offset by selling the extracted caffeine.

    Would these plants upset the global caffeine market?

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  118. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh my god, here it comes. Another slashdot humor cliche!

  119. The Problem with Evangelists... by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

    ...is that they have one solution for everyone. And one size just doesn't fit all, no matter how good your marketing campaign.

    I'm experimenting with my diet to improve my health; I find that caffeine stabilizes my moods and helps me sleep. But that's my whacked-out biochemistry; I certainly don't expect others to have the same reaction.

    Everything we consume can be viewed as a drug; individual metabolisms and lifestyles determine what is "good" or "bad" for our bodies. We need freedom of individual choice, not dictates from ideologues.

  120. Re:Decaffeinated? - have we learned nothing from.. by spd_rcr · · Score: 1

    ..the pot industry, make it stronger. you don't seen any thc-light genetic strains winning awards do you ? that's like nicotine free cigarettes, where are the sales for that ? have you ever bought alcohol free beer from the super market ?

    --
    - tensions in our lives that are attacking our minds, unite themselves together to make our consciousness blind - op'ivy
  121. I'll pass by AssFace · · Score: 1

    Coffee beans have something in them that actually increases your hunger levels. Caffeine overrides that mechanism, its ability to blunt hunger cravings is greater than the other's ability to make us hungry.

    So by having a decaffinated coffee, you are bypassing all of the positive sides of caffeine (increased metabolism, increase FFA into the bloodstream so you can burn more fat with the now increased metabolism, blunted hunger, keeps you awake, etc), and instead you get something that just makes you more hungry.

    I love my coffee, although since moving, I haven't had a cup - used to have at least 3 a day.
    I'm glad for it, it lowers my tolerance of it, meaning that I will have increased response next time I do have some coffee.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  122. Fazenda Catuai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is some good, good stuff...

  123. So much caffeine, so little time. by pherris · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There's a local coffee house call Java Hut that has a drink called the "Psycho Blast". It's 32oz that's made with eight shots of espresso, sumatra [caffeinated] ice cream, torani chocolate, vanilla, krank20 and crushed choco covered espresso beans.

    Rumor has it John Ashcroft is trying to get it declared as a controlled substance.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  124. I like coffee, but not heart palpitations. Sue me. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

    Surely the kind of person who thinks caffeine will kill them, is hardly likely to touch a genetically modified plant?

    You seem to imply that people who are concerned about their caffeine intake are foolish and reactionary.

    CAFFEINE IS BAD FOR YOU. ALL OF YOU. PERIOD.

    Ask your doctor if you don't believe me.

    Not so long ago we ate loads of fried food, fat and sugar, we smoked woodbines, we drank beer and whisky all the time and we didn't die!

    And then Eve tasted the apple (damn health food) and we were cast out of the Garden...

  125. Will the plants survive? by b1ng0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If these coffee plants contain 70% less caffeine, I wonder how succeptible to pests they will be since caffeine acts as an insecticide to prevent insects from tearing the coffee plant to shreds.

  126. Thank Goodness!! by t0ny · · Score: 1

    This just in- scientists are hard at work researching ways of infusing more caffine into Mountain Dew.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  127. Decaffeinated coffee==useless warm, brown water by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    To balance the force, the same researchers should grow a super caffeinated coffe plant.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  128. Coffee under arc lamps? by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    An Etalon-Copy of Russian Frequency and Time etalon in Irkutsk, Siberia has a tradition of growing coffee in labs as a decorative plant. I have a tree at home, too. It's simply not possible to grow more than 1 cup per tree per year. And the trees prefer shadow and hate arc lamps, too. If you want more caffeine it's much simpler to distil it from tea and add to your legal decaffeinated coffee.

    The scientists should better invent the substance that has all positive sides of caffeine and has no negative ones - and is not addictive. I am a caffeine addict.

  129. in related news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Detroit has produced a 100% environmentally friendly automobile, it contains 100% less engine.

  130. damn... by seraph1m · · Score: 1

    I don't ususally comment, but NOOOOOOOOOO. The caffeine is the life.

  131. a long time ago by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    some turkish traders went to the tip of the arabian peninsula, to yemen, and they said to the yemenese: "whaddya got?"

    and the yemenese said, "well we got this stuff called qhat and this stuff called coffee."

    "well we only got room for one plant on teh boat."

    "here, have some coffee."

    years later, the turks finally got tired of being wired staying up all night laying seige to vienna, so they just left, and left all these bags of coffee beans laying around.

    and the austro-hungarians said, what is this stuff?

    it was not long before the viennese were joyous and wired, and history had been made.

    my question is this: what if the turks had taken the qhat instead of the coffee so many centuries back?

    qhat is this leaf you chew for like hours, and it slowly builds a stupefying narcotic effect: basically, the opposite of coffee. it's popular in egypt and northeastern africa.

    what would a world be like if all these slashdot coders were brought up to chew qhat instead of drink coffee? would we still be working in DOS and 8088s? ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  132. Since when ... by Quixotic+Raindrop · · Score: 1

    ... does it imply that if decaffinated coffee beans can be grown, that all coffee will be decaffinated?

    Seems like these boffins [...] to take away your buzz.

    I have serious doubts that once these trees are commercially viable, that all coffee will suddenly be transformed into half-caf or de-caf just because some decaffinated coffee bean trees exist. That's just stupid, inflammatory, and irrelevant. Mark editorials as such, don't editorialize in the space reserved for useful ... oh, who am I kidding. Slashdot editors don't know how not to evangelize. Never mind.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
  133. Microsoft - the biggest customer?? No, governments by Thor+Ablestar · · Score: 1

    Bio-engineered hunans to think less, and consume more?

    Patent the idea and sell it to your government before I sell it to Mr. Putin. Politicians need it to create a fully controlled electorate. The only problem will be the interbreeding of such people with usual ones creating patent problems. Imagine: You have a think-less GM bride, and Monsanto lawyers accuse you of violationg their patent by having children with her.

    For my taste, they'd better add th humans an organ that produces caffeine.

    Add SCO jokes to taste. Consume hot.

  134. I sense ... EVIL by opencity · · Score: 1

    This has to be part of a larger plot. Can anyone tie in Microsoft, the CIA and the Mason's?

    --
    Physics is like sex: sure, it may give some practical results, but that's not why we do it.
  135. What!!! by sflory · · Score: 1

    Damn it you're going the wrong way!!! We want more caffeine.

    --
    IANALBIPOOGL (I am not a Lawyer, but I play one on GrokLaw.)
  136. Downward spiral of productivity by extremesanity · · Score: 1

    Combining the Internet and Cafeine-challenged coffee is a really bad idea. I figure we are all going to end up falling asleep and being taken over by the Canadians.

    1. Re:Downward spiral of productivity by coke_dite · · Score: 1

      Oh sure.... (everybody now) BLAME CANADA!!!

      --
      Visit us at http://www.iblist.com!
  137. Insightful? Who modded *you* insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That post was only three sentences! That's too short to be insightful! Can I get modded up now?

    1. Re:Insightful? Who modded *you* insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

  138. Goddamn Genetic Engineers! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1


    Oh wait, I'm a genetic engineer!

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  139. Remember to filter through a brewery by northwind · · Score: 1

    Always remember to filter decaf through a brewery.
    It removes the nasty taste and adds the nicer beer flavor and the alcohol.

  140. I'll tell you the point by monique · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some of us like the taste of coffee, but don't like the effects.

    Believe me, I love a good caffeine buzz -- and for the longest time, I didn't think it was affecting me, because I could easily go to sleep at night, and I could sleep for 12 hours at a stretch, too!

    Problem was, I was always tired. No amount of sleep was enough. My doctor suggested quitting caffeine -- and it worked! Like a charm. Sure, I had a pounding headache for the first week, but after that, I felt great, and I could wake up refreshed after a normal amount of sleep. I actually had *more* energy than I did while on caffeine.

    I grew up drinking coffee. My dad taught me how to brew it when I was four. Cheap decaf sucks -- my understanding is that they use chlorine in the process, but whatever the reason, cheap decaf makes my stomach churn. It also tastes awful. Expensive decaf is better, but still just a little less tasty than the real deal.

    If they can make a plant that will give me yummy coffee and little caffeine, I'm all for it!

    --
    -monique
  141. caffine is a bug repellant/killer by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

    Caffine is being used now as an industrial bug killer, so it seems that caffine in plants tastes bad to the animals that eat them and also makes them sick (like in a caffine overdose. Take that versus the frankenfood theory already posted here, and I will just have to say "no thanks" to coffee in general...

  142. Re:It's simple... by quasi_steller · · Score: 1

    ...his hand gets lonely.

    --
    ...interesting if true.
  143. Palpitations? PAH! by DulcetTone · · Score: 1
    Our genetic stock will be the richer when these herbal tea-sippers are culled from the herd.

    tone

    --
    tone
  144. Its called hemp by peter303 · · Score: 1

    MJ w w/o THC

  145. Spalding Grey on decaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, caffeine was removed from coffee for medicinal purposes. Not a troll, but a fact.

    Visitors were observed as saying, "Oh jet lag, need coffee! I don't understand, it tastes like coffee, but I can't seem to get a buzz, and why can't I take a shit".

    [From Spalding Grey's Monster In a Box video]

  146. This is pure evil by LeeRagans · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is science run AMOK. It must be stopped.

  147. what we evolved to eat... by paulymath · · Score: 1

    ...is very different from what we eat now. Bread, for example, is very new and it is impossible (given the time required for successful evolution in the right direction) for our bodies to assimilate it properly. This includes pretty much anything with processed grains. There are a number of diets based on this fact. Our bodies are not equipped to handle, say, noodles or pastries at the rate we ingest them... and this is linked, by some studies, to the increased rate of obesity congruent with the use of these foods in our increasinglyl surreal diets. ...but I eat them happily.

  148. OMG!!! by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    Are they gonna open franchises in the Bay Area by any chance???

    Failing that, if I paypal you some money, will you pack one in dry ice and send it to me?

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  149. Not insects, but... by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    Plants and bacteria are from different kingdoms:

    "The natural transfer of genetic material from some phytopathogenic bacteria to plants has been established. For example, the symptoms of crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens are due to the transfer and stable integration into the plant genome of phytohormone biosynthetic genes contained on a bacterial plasmid. The reverse process has yet to be demonstrated in a natural environment, however, numerous studies have attempted to establish its possibility."

    - this site

    This PDF gives a few examples, too. Not to mention Bacteria and Yeast.

    1. Re:Not insects, but... by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      The discussion is drifting. You are now talking a bateria that causes a tumor-like desease in a plant by injecting a part of its dna, a bit like a virus does. This is only very remotely related to breeding and hybridization.

      Hybridization does occur naturally, but only in very closely related species (for instance in the Blue-winged Warbler and the Golden-winged Warbler). Species from completely different kingdoms will never mate and succesfully reproduce (this is what we were talking originally).

      This barrier between widely differentiated species is nature's safeguard against catastrophic changes in the biotope. A species behaves in its environment according to its genes; changes in the genes will modify this behaviour in one way or another. Drastic changes in the genes have the potential to cause drastic behavioural changes. This could mean the end of the species in question and/or of other species who feed on it, are hunted by it, compete with it for food, or depend on it in any other way directly or indirectly.

      GE comes down to removing this natural safeguard. It is and will always remain a risky business.

  150. Bachelor Chow circa 3000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bachelor Chow is featured on at least two billboards in the opening sequence of Futurama.

  151. Bomb them by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Where is Bush when you need him?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  152. this ist just.... STUPID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, it's like rice without the soy soup, or chewing gum without the gum... it's just... stupidstupidstupid...

    ãã^2ãã(TM)ï¼
    (in case this database is disliking wchar, bakka! bakka!)

  153. Err... by Eudial · · Score: 1

    Exactly what's the idea?

    What's next? Lightless lightbulbs? Liquid concrete? Rubber needles? Inflammable propane? Solid gas?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  154. WHAAAATTT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am normally pro-ge but what the hell use is this, this is immoral. coffee tastes like crap caffeines the whole point. Thats it I'm amish, for this is an affront to the lord.

    -troy

  155. what a horrible idea by Eminor · · Score: 1

    It not they way it's meant to be!!!!!

  156. Re: coworkers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else think the "cow-orker" hyphenation is stupid?

    OH NO! What if I'm one of them, and therefore cannot be part of the dogbert elite "ruling" class?!

  157. Incorrect by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    I've worked at Starbucks for years, and I know. Believe me. *raises pinky to mouth*
    MOST decaf is produced using benzene, yep, benzene. Soak the beans in benzene, let the cafffeine dissolve out, and wash 'em. Why do you think brewed decaf coffee has that nasty acidic smell?
    SWP decaf has the debatable plus of having no flavor.
    What does Gloria Jean's know about coffee, since you flavor your beans? Flavoring should be added POST-brew, otherwise the flavor components oxidize over time yielding the ungodly brown substance you guys serve.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Incorrect by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Wow, a Starbucks employee chastizing an employee of a company who offers flavored coffees. I'm trying not to be a coffee snob here, but there are lots of folks who see these coffee vendors as bottom of the barrel, a notch above Maxwell House.

      Anyhow, to add some content to this comment, most decaf coffee is produced with the Methylene Chloride process (MC), not benzene. I agree, it leaves an unpleasant flavor in the coffee, though the Merk Manual says it should all evaporate in roasting. For some reason, the Swiss Water Process (SWP) as described in the parent post is somehow incapible of being accomplished by its inventors/licensees. There's a new processing plant in Mexico, and they do a really good job with their Water Process (not brand-named SWP). I was skeptical, I wouldn't roast SWP before because it was so bland, but now I'm sold on these Mexican-processed beans (the actual beans I buy come from Sumatra, Guatamala and Brazil). More info.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  158. [OT] Dry Water by tgrigsby · · Score: 1

    Actually, there is such a thing as Dry Water. It comes in a carton. It's actually a gel with a 96% water content. You cut the bottom out, stick it about 4 inches into the dirt next to a plant, and it keeps the plant hydrated. Bacterial action breaks down the gel and releases the water slowly. One carton is good for about 60 days. And in the uber-hot California central valley, continuous hydration of outdoor plants is key.

    As for alcohol-free beer -- what the heck is that all about? And low cal beer? Dude, if I'm throwing down some cold ones with the guys, I *seriously* could not care less about the my caloric intake.

    --
    *** *** You're just jealous 'cause the voices talk to me... ***
  159. Sheesh by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
    Species from completely different kingdoms will never mate and succesfully reproduce (this is what we were talking originally). It was about originally about introducing genes from an unrelated organism (first species, then you extended it to kingdom - you put the "breeding" bit in fairly early, too).

    This is a strawman argument, anyway. The natural transfer of a genetic information across kingdoms/species/etc. is analogous to the artificial insertion of a gene into a plant, not breeding them together to produce some lame mad science experiment.

    Here's a better article:

    Of the 51 examined gene fusions that are represented in at least two of the three primary kingdoms (Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryota), 31 were most probably disseminated by cross-kingdom horizontal gene transfer, whereas 14 appeared to have evolved independently in different kingdoms and two were probably inherited from the common ancestor of modern life forms.

    And here is another:

    The plant symbiont Bradyrhizobium japonicum has two glutamine synthetase genes, one similar to those found in other bacteria, the other 50% identical to the enzymes from higher plants. When protein sequences encoded by archaeal genomes are used to search protein sequence databases for similar sequences, some sequences have their best match with sequences from eubacteria. The opposite is also true (ref1, ref2, ref3). There are even a few cases where one sequence segment of a protein with an origin in one kingdom is attached to a segment with an origin in another kingdom (ref).

    1. Re:Sheesh by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 1
      This is a strawman argument, anyway. The natural transfer of a genetic information across kingdoms/species/etc. is analogous to the artificial insertion of a gene into a plant, not breeding them together to produce some lame mad science experiment.

      Please read the original post I was replying to. Can we atleast agree on genetic modification not being equal to breeding? I admit I was pushing it a bit far, but I was trying to make a point.

      The first site times out (lot of that happening here in Europe when the US is surfing bigtime lately), I'm aware of the facts on the second site, I know cross-kingdom transfer happens mostly in symbiotes, I even use that in my little doom scenario in another post.

      I obviously don't entirely agree with the given interpretation of those facts. Argueing genetic engineering is not that dangerous because most genes have probably been transferred some time in the past to most of the species out there already is pushing it at least as far as I did.

    2. Re:Sheesh by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1
      Yeah, it stopped working for a while right after I loaded the page the first time. It seems to be working now. The PDF is a bit easier to read.

      Anyway, my point was that natural gene transfer across extremely different species (ie, cross-kingdom) isn't something completely unknown, nor is doing it necessarily some mad science perversion of nature. Whether it is a good idea or not remains to be seen and would depend on the individual case. There's a healthy medium between extreme paranoia and extreme recklessness - it would be nice to see some good regulations or necessary precautions on this, but most stuff i've heard of is from fanatics pushing on a complete ban of anything GMO. I'd agree with anyone saying Monsanto is evil, though - I'd like to see "open-source"/public domain stuff, rather than ridiculous gene patents, but that's drifting off to another topic entirely.

  160. More Caffine! Not less! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have coffee plants that are genetically engineered to have more caffine in them? DECAF IS THE ANTI-CHRIST!

  161. Expanding the brand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decaffeinated coffee is like devaluing the brand name.

    Hmmm. Someone should tell Coca Cola that "Caffeine-Free Sugar-Free Coke" is like devaluing their brand name. Or tell all the large brewing companies that non-alcoholic beer is devaluing their brand names. These are clueless companies that could use your advice on building a brand, I'm sure. ;-)

    No, I'd say it helps the brand. This way, I can be a "Labatts" guy and drink their John Labatt Classic high-test stuff, while my girlfriend can be a "Labatts" girl and drink their Labatt 0.5 dealcoholized stuff. As for it tasting worse, I love beer, and I prefer the taste of 5-7% alcohol in my beer. But -all- beer (or coffee or soda) is an acquired taste, so the stuff with less of a kick is simply a taste some people learn to like while getting the benefit of less caffeine/alcohol/sugar.

    Yay for choice! And yay for the brands that offer the choice!

  162. yuck by mass_nerder · · Score: 1

    all i gotta say ....... someone scream "RAPE"