Slashdot Mirror


New Nano-ITX 12cm Motherboards

Kris_J writes "mini-itx.com have exclusive pictures of VIA's new 12cm x 12cm motherboard standard they're terming 'Nano-ITX'. VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs and now a new batch of custom PC projects can be produced where previously there wasn't quite enough room for the motherboard. I already have an idea..."

439 comments

  1. Government doing the right thing for once... by Bame+Flait · · Score: 5, Funny

    VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs

    Good thing Sodimmy is no longer illegal.

    1. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs
      >
      >Good thing Sodimmy is no longer illegal.

      Speaking of which, there's no mention in the article whether VIA will include DRM (Digital Rights Management) on this motherboard. I guess mandatory DRM isn't a selling point, unless your customer is the MPAA, RIAA or Microsoft.

    2. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrrgghhhh!!! Mini-itx.com is A web site. One. Singular. It HAS exclusive pictures... VIA is A company. One. Also singular. It HAS removed the legacy ports...

    3. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Metal_Demon · · Score: 1
      Good thing Sodimmy is no longer illegal.

      It is for some of us. Stupid UCMJ.

      --
      Trust Your Technolust
    4. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 0, Troll
      In American, you're correct. In English, Kris_J is correct.

      VIA is a company. A company is a collection of PEOPLE, not a PERSON. "The people of VIA has removed..." is wrong, thus "VIA has removed..." is wrong.

      Stupid Yanks.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    5. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wrong again. A company is a legal entity with distinct legal rights suitable for such an entity. You're thinking of a commune.

    6. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by operagost · · Score: 1
      Guess what? Both are correct in British English. At least, I've heard both, and others seem to agree.

      See how I did that without the ad hom attack? Now play nicely.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a show of class you stupid cocksucker.

    8. Re:Government doing the right thing for once... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1
      Look!

      It's a laptop without a case, display and keypoard!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  2. Specs... by rf0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Noticable by their absence are the specs though I guess we would see the 800Mhz and 1 GHz Via C3 chips to start with

    Rus

    1. Re:Specs... by sl0ppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the Website:

      The secret of Nano-ITX is the Nano-BGA (Ball Grid Array) package, which has allowed VIA to squeeze a 1Ghz C3 CPU into just 15mm square

    2. Re:Specs... by mopslik · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess we would see the 800Mhz and 1 GHz Via C3 chips to start

      While not the full specs, the screenshot page says...

      The secret of Nano-ITX is the Nano-BGA (Ball Grid Array) package, which has allowed VIA to squeeze a 1Ghz C3 CPU into just 15mm square.

      So, yep.

    3. Re:Specs... by missing000 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Also:

      1 s-video
      1 RCA (video?)
      1 VGA
      3 port audio (in, out mic?)
      2 USB
      1 LAN
      2 IDE
      1 mini-PCI
      1 SODIMM
      (all guesses from photos)

    4. Re:Specs... by sxpert · · Score: 1

      well, seeing from previous incarnation, the RCA can probably switch between composite tv out and digital sound (same as optical, but over a copper wire)

    5. Re:Specs... by sl0ppy · · Score: 1

      was the digital sound s/pdif?

      if so, in the professional recording world, s/pdif (sony/philips digital interface) is preferred over that optical thingy.

  3. Photos? Don't bother. by zedmelon · · Score: 5, Informative

    The idea is pretty interesting. I can only hope that it turns out better than this article suggests.

    The pics are arranged in a three by three grid, but don't bother. Pics one and two are decent, three is okay, and nine is passable, but the rest are so blurry that once you've heard the board is 120 mm square, they're nothing you can't get from just viewing the thumbnails.

    :\

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  4. Ah-ha! by tds67 · · Score: 5, Funny
    VIA have removed the legacy ports, moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs...

    So that's where Sodimm Hussein has been hiding! It's now the mother of all boards!

  5. Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    VIA have removed the legacy ports

    I wish these companies would leave just a single RS-232 or RS-422 port. Sometimes you need a simple serial connection to connect through if the network is down. The lack of serial also limits the use for these boards for controlling other pieces of hardware if embedding is your thing.

    Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Bring back the serial port! by a_ghostwheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That is why you have mini-PCI there - just install appropriate card.

    2. Re:Bring back the serial port! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Just get a USB->RS232 cable.

    3. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Orblivion · · Score: 0

      It's just NOT the same.

    4. Re:Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Just get a USB->RS232 cable.

      That's another layer of complexity. It may work fine for Rube Goldberg but the less things to break, the better.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

      Amen. The other thing is that there is a lot of devices out there that still use the serial port or parallel port for comminication with PCs... not things like printers, but things like scientific testing equipment.

      What happens when you can't plug these things into our PCs anymore? Will we see the return of the I/O card?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    6. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Leffe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a serial port is pretty much needed if you have some old computer without a network card.

      Of course, an old computer will most likely have a serial port. This will however change in the future when the computers released 'today' without ports(a network card though, there's still hope...) become old, and people want to leech the data stored on them. Or maybe rebuild them or whatever.

    7. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1

      Provided the BIOS supports USB<->RS-232 adaptors, one of those should be sufficient for most purposes. LILO, syslinux, and so on do their I/O via the BIOS, so it would be redirected. And the Linux console would be redirected after boot provided your kernel had RS-232 over USB and serial console enabled.

      It's too bad serial console support on PC's sucks so severely though. Even if you have a RS-232 port on the motherboard, there's no way to unstick a wedged machine, like you can do by sending a break on the serial console of most Sun machines.

    8. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Milican · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, expecially on the embedded side. Also, a USB to RS232 adapter would not work because 90% of the time you need more than just transmit and receive. The control lines for serial are just as important if not more so. Perhaps just a header (just nine pins) not the full blown connector would work. Oh well, on the PC side RS232 has pretty much gone the way of the dinosaurs. I suspect in another decade the embedded world will have done so as well.

      JOhn

    9. Re:Bring back the serial port! by capsteve · · Score: 5, Informative

      use a keyspan usb-to-serial adapter.
      that's what mac users have been doing for years...

      --
      three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
    10. Re:Bring back the serial port! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Um. It's RS232 for christ's sake. How difficult do you think it is for the USB -> RS232 port to work? The cables I've used have the entire circuit (including chips etc) inside the plug.

      It's damn cool if you ask me. No need to ugly, space hogging RS232 ports on my M/B. If I ever need RS232 I know I can just plug a cable into one of my USB ports.

    11. Re:Bring back the serial port! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      If size is the problem, ditch the bulky dsub connector for something smaller, and make a simple external dongle.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    12. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Maybe another solution would be to remove the RS-232 port as is and replace it with a waffer style connector. The idea being that the functionality would be there, but not the bulk. If done right, all you would need are some contacts on the mother board and a plastiv covering to hold the connector in place. It should also be cheaper to manufacture.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    13. Re:Bring back the serial port! by ilikecaffeine · · Score: 1

      Good idea. Let's remove the serial port. We'll save space and it'll look cleaner -- those d-sub connectors are so ugly.
      Yeah right.
      The problem is that sure, it saves space on the board, but it takes up more space overall. If you need a serial port, you have to go buy another cable (and probably a USB hub, which is at least 2 additional cables). Then instead of a nice, clean, direct to the board connection, you have a random extra cable coming out the back of your computer. Grrrr....
      And what's with calling it legacy hardware? 8-track is legacy hardware. RS-232 is not. It's used quite a bit in my industry (mobile electronic controls), and will be for the forseeable future. We've had a lot of trouble finding laptops that have rs-232 ports, and finally we just gave up. We have to lug around stupid cables to bridge between superultramegafasthighspeed USB and ol' reliable RS232. There's no performance gain, so what's the point?

    14. Re:Bring back the serial port! by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Of course, an old computer will most likely have a serial port. This will however change in the future when the computers released 'today' without ports(a network card though, there's still hope...) become old, and people want to leech the data stored on them. Or maybe rebuild them or whatever.

      By the time serial ports or -serial converters really are rare, the market who actually use such devices will be even more of a niche than it is now - and the people in it will have been intelligent enough to have preserved appropriate methods of accessing their archaic peripherals.

    15. Re:Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 1


      .. have the entire circuit (including chips etc) inside the plug.

      .. and chips never fail. Really, for embedding things like this KISS will save you work in the long run.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    16. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Milican · · Score: 1

      oops... typo... shoulda used preview mode :(

      JOhn

    17. Re:Bring back the serial port! by grub · · Score: 1


      Yup. Hell, I'd be happy with bare solder pads on the board. I rarely need anything other than TX, RX and Ground.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    18. Re:Bring back the serial port! by semanticgap · · Score: 2

      Size is not the problem - look at Cisco devices, a lot of them now have RJ45 as the serial connector.

      I agree, a serial port is needed - I'd like to run UNIX on one of those things, and I'd like a serial console. In fact, if they had a board that had no video and just serial, that'd be grand, I'd buy one.

    19. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

      I know this was tongue in cheek, but please... RS-232 hasn't disappeared in any way, shape, or form. Virtually every PC motherboard out there still has at least one (and usually two) serial ports. About the only ones that don't are the Abit MAX series (which has removed all legacy ports), this one, and some miniITX form factor boards.

      If you need a real serial port, then just avoid buying one of the 1% of boards that doesn't have one.

      Every time a story is posted to /. about a board that doesn't have serial the RS-232 freaks crawl out of the woodwork. If you're smart enough to know all the uses for RS-232, then you should damn well be smart enough to buy the right board.

      Oh, and I like serial too... my remote control is programmed via it (although it works fine w/ a USB->serial dongle if needed).

    20. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh I forgive ya.

    21. Re:Bring back the serial port! by clasher · · Score: 1

      If you want a board with a serial port buy one; the majority of boards sold now seem have them. Some people do not want serial ports on their mainboards and for a long time it has been hard to find boards without serial connectors.

      I was very satisfied to find my Intel DME810? non-legacy board. It's small form factor is in part due to the lack of legacy connectors that I have no use for (for that machine at least).

      I see no reason to argue that every mainboard needs an RS-232 port, especially considering most already have them. This company is selling to a demanding market that you apparently aren't a part of, can't we leave it at that.

    22. Re:Bring back the serial port! by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      It's too bad serial console support on PC's sucks so severely though.

      Even when using Linux, BSD, ect? Is this a hardware issue?

      Even if you have a RS-232 port on the motherboard, there's no way to unstick a wedged machine

      I currently have an old Commodore hooked to my (x86) Linux box over RS232 as a terminal, so I'll be sure to try that if it ever locks up.

    23. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Demodian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One thing most people do not consider in removing direct "legacy devices" from the motherboards is that USB->RS232 adds an extra programming layer for embedded applications that would have a much easier time dealing with directly with the normal RS232 logic. Granted, DOS is a thing of ancient history, but it was easy to code communications for. Using USB drivers blows chunks if the driver for the USB->RS232 is written poorly (which I've found to be the case with some of the off-the-shelf adapters).

    24. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what do you thing a SERIAL PORT RUNS ON! It's a frickin UART chip. Subtracting the DSUB and UART makes the MB smaller. Sure, the cable MAY fail. But the odds of a small board with one chip and a few resistors failing is slim to none. This is a really stupid argument.

    25. Re:Bring back the serial port! by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      If I ever need RS232 I know I can just plug a cable into one of my USB ports.

      Not necessarily. In order for your RS232-USB converter to work, you need to have device drivers not only for USB, but for the converter as well. On the hardware end it may be simple, but on the software end it's very complicated.

      When the Linux kernel boots, it can be configured to send boot messages to the serial port. This feature will NOT work with USB serial devices, because the kernel talks to the RS232 registers directly.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    26. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magic SysKey is your friend.

    27. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I wonder why they didnt just create some new slim connector format like the ones on the bottoms of cell phones or dongles for pcmcia cards. At least if you needed serial, a special cable (but still raw serial format) would allow you to do your business.

      And for those of us not wanting to run winblows or some usb aware os, ie asm code or some other embedded application, this would eliminate the need for the usb to serial adapters.

      i agree though, rs232 now and for quite a while will never be legacy.

    28. Re:Bring back the serial port! by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      You mean simple... like removing ports from the board?

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    29. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Magic SysReq Key.. where's the coffee...

    30. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      the point about this board is its the -only- one of its size factor. if we were talking about ATX, you might have a point.

    31. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just stick a 9 pin header on the board, and let me run a cable from it to the back of the case if I want a 9pin D-Sub RS232 port; AT style.

    32. Re:Bring back the serial port! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The fun part comes when the only way to get data off a computer is to hook a serial port up to a usb adapter up to a firewire adapter up to a cyber-link to your brain up to the vast alien mind net in order to play pong with our new alien over lords in the year 30001!

      Now that is the ultimate hack.

    33. Re:Bring back the serial port! by shepd · · Score: 1

      This would fit your bill.

      They also make one with 3 serial ports.

      Want one? Ask me! :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    34. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm interested! Shoot your mail address to grub at grub.net (it appears unobfuscated in /. postings anyhow..) I'm in .ca as well

    35. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Really, for embedding things like this KISS will save you work in the long run.

      Maybe back in the 70's, but nowadays, they're just money-grubbing whores who won't save you shit.

    36. Re:Bring back the serial port! by buserror · · Score: 1

      Apple shipped MiniDIN serial ports for about 20 years before they ditched them with the iMac
      Even better, the later generation of it even had a +5V, making it absolutly perfect for embedded stuff.

      Why the pcs still carry DB9s for serial, I just don't kow!

    37. Re:Bring back the serial port! by tds67 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

      Yes, and the same goes for the 1.44Mb floppy drive. Dell is trying to obsolete it, and Ford Motor Company went along with it and bought PCs from Dell without floppy drives.

      Why do PC and PC part manufacturers keep pushing for changes that should in fact be demand (or lack thereof) driven?

    38. Re:Bring back the serial port! by sxpert · · Score: 1

      yeah, and save space, remove those crappy mini-jacks that love to jump off with the first vibrations where the spring action of the female part ejects the male part... (that's THE problem I have with my carpc). I'd love to see there replaced with something that HOLDS IN PLACE...

    39. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      In a month or two(was in print several months ago), Linux Journal is going to have an article on how to create a USB device that communicates through the Linux USB generic serial driver.

      I know it doesn't solve everyone's problems, but you're free to submit a patch to allow the same functionality from the normal serial device to the USB one.

    40. Re:Bring back the serial port! by michrech · · Score: 1

      What happens when you can't plug these things into our PCs anymore? Will we see the return of the I/O card?

      What do you mean "The return of" the I/O card? We still sell them (in a PCI version) all the time.

      No matter if your using laptops or PC's, SIIG still makes quite a few cards with 'legacy' ports; Including serial controlers...

      Bunch of babies... Can't look nothin' up for yourselv's? =]

      --
      bork bork bork!
    41. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Merlin42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at the pics at:
      http://epia-center.de/modules.php?name=News&file=a rticle&sid=202
      In particular the first pics shows two connectors next to the vertically mounted battery. They don't seem to be mentioned in any of the specs so I am going to guess they are for connecting an RS-232 or possibly also a parallel port.

    42. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO NO NO NO NO! All the programmer has to do is code for the COM port. There is no business in the programmer doing the driver's job! ;) I have many programs that work just fine over a USB to serial cable. Only exception may be is dos programs don't work, but everything else does.

    43. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Eccles · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that sure, it saves space on the board, but it takes up more space overall.

      If, and only if, you need an RS-232 connector. I haven't used one in nigh-on 10 years, and I bet that 98%+ or more of the computing world hasn't used one in a long time either. You have specialized needs, don't blame the rest of the world for not wanting to pay for something they don't use just to save you a couple of cables. Heck, this thing doesn't even include the keyboard and mouse connectors still on most PCs sold.

      Now what you could call for is a teeny connector (say, the size of the plugs digital cameras have) to which a break-out box with an RS-232 connection can be added, which allows you to skip the USB conversion, boot from it, yadda yadda.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    44. Re:Bring back the serial port! by trippinonbsd · · Score: 2

      They should at least have the serial header on the board so you can have a serial backplate if you wish.

    45. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While this is true, in this case, if you REALLY need a Serial Port, I am sure a Mini-PCI expansion port has been or will be developed. The arguement for on board Serial Ports is getting really small. Also, don't even think of using these MB's in a server. You buy SERVER Mb's for this and they usuall DO have a serial port. There's also a new protocol coming out soon which will let you serially connect devices with out need for device drivers. It's based on USB and for the life of me I canot figure out why

      --

      Gorkman

    46. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm playing devil's advocate here or am just a incorrigible (sp?) luddite, but none of my VTs have a USB port on them. His point is very valid, sometimes, the serial (console) port is the only way to get in when sh*t hits the fan.

    47. Re:Bring back the serial port! by deprogram · · Score: 1

      ATX motherboards may have serial ports still, but how long will that last? It's a bunch of hardware that very few use, and slashing costs and razor-thin margins dictate that un-needed components will eventually be eliminated.

      Abits' new boards are a good example. Need a parallel port? Don't buy one. Need ps2 ports for keyboard and mouse? Hah!

      Moreover, have you tried to buy a new laptop/notebook with serial lately? Uh-huh, that's right. They just don't come with serial anymore, which makes remote maintenance of headless machines something you'll only be doing with your trusty legacy notebook...

    48. Re:Bring back the serial port! by someguy42 · · Score: 1

      My first guess would be additional (front-panel style) USB ports and front panel connections such as the power switch, HDD LED's, etc.

      --
      The probability that someone is watching you is directly proportional to the stupidity of your actions.
    49. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      For industrial uses, you want a connector that you can screw into for a truly positive vibration resistant connection. Actually, it's too bad that there wasn't any USB / ADB / PS/2 port standard that had a positive hold. Screws or thumb-spring latches would do.

    50. Re:Bring back the serial port! by semanticgap · · Score: 1

      Me too - can you post an e-mail or a url to buy these?

    51. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      hey just don't come with serial anymore, which makes remote maintenance of headless machines something you'll only be doing with your trusty legacy notebook...

      Or with a USB->serial dongle, which are pretty much universal now and bug free.

      If you're trying to do magic with the serial port (e.g. - trying to raise specific lines in order to talk to some esoteric device -- been there, done that) then it may not work, but if you're using standard interfaces then they work just fine. Really. They've improved the hardware and drivers since they first appeared and a lot of the issues with the first generation stuff is gone now.

      It's a bunch of hardware that very few use, and slashing costs and razor-thin margins dictate that un-needed components will eventually be eliminated.

      Eventually, but I'd be surprised if that was widespread in less than 5 years. Quite a few people use the hardware, actually. There's a freaking ton of keyboards and mice out there that use PS/2 ports, legions of switches and UPS's that rely on serial, and a few bazillion printers that use the parallel port. Hell, there are still printers available that only do parallel.

      The Abit MAX series hasn't been the runaway favorite that Abit was hoping for. In fact, much of the community it targets - the high end case modders/gamers/geeks shun it because of the lack of older interfaces. After all, it costs nothing extra to get a different board that has just as many IDE controllers, USB ports, firewire, etc. and still has the legacy stuff on board. So why castrate yourself?

      The BTX form factor still shows the legacy connectors present in the sample motherboard, and so they're likely to continue for at least one more generation of MBs/cases. I'd bet they'll be in the successor as well.

    52. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      There are a couple on-board header-type jacks that aren't accounted for, very close to the I/O jack area.

      I agree. RS-232 is great, and it is simple. With some simple programming trickery, any $2 microcontroller can do it. With a little less trickery and using in-built hardware on said chip plus a few cents on a MAX232 chip, and with a $100 parts & programmer budget, one can make a very nice peripheral that is easy to program for. This is not anywhere nearly as cheap or easy as USB, PCI or any other I/O standard that I know.

      There were times where I wanted more than four ports, simply because I had a video projector control, microchip programmer, RS-232 Palm dock plus my hardware project test unit connected, as well as wanting a real hardware modem connected.

    53. Re:Bring back the serial port! by ninewands · · Score: 2, Informative
      Quoth the poster:
      The arguement for on board Serial Ports is getting really small.

      You obviously have never had to use a PC as a serial console for a headless server.
    54. Re:Bring back the serial port! by kfg · · Score: 1

      Because they are trying to drive the demand to produce sales, and yes, most of that push is coming from Redmond pushing on the hardware manufacturers to move in a direction that requires an OS upgrade.

      It's an unholy feedback cycle that profits everyone, but. . . us.

      KFG

    55. Re:Bring back the serial port! by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

      Just get a USB->RS232 cable.

      That's another layer of complexity. It may work fine for Rube Goldberg but the less things to break, the better.


      So, making the 5 RS232 users left in the world buy a simple dongle is more complex than building an extra port into every motherboard?

    56. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Directrix1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you talking about a computer or your sex life?

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    57. Re:Bring back the serial port! by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      the point about this board is its the -only- one of its size factor. if we were talking about ATX, you might have a point.

      I guess I'm still not seeing how this complaint is valid or worthwhile. After all, the EPIA boards are 15cm X 15cm and have the full range of ports. I can't imagine an application where a whopping total of 1.2 inches is going to make all the difference.

      I mean dang, why don't I start complaining that the EPIA lacks onboard sATA and RAID? They made a decision based on the market that they want to reach.

    58. Re:Bring back the serial port! by deprogram · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you're saying, but:

      The Abit MAX series hasn't been the runaway favorite that Abit was hoping for. In fact, much of the community it targets - the high end case modders/gamers/geeks shun it because of the lack of older interfaces. After all, it costs nothing extra to get a different board that has just as many IDE controllers, USB ports, firewire, etc. and still has the legacy stuff on board. So why castrate yourself?

      Improved speed. All that legacy hardware still needs to work, and the motherboard's BIOS still has to interface it to the OS. Without the constraints of the old interface standards, chipset manufacturers can eliminate a lot of circuitry, and corresponding hardware interrupts. Of course, this kind of performance penalty may be very slight, and difficult to quantify, and I don't claim to be a hardware guru by any means. However, the elimination of the legacy ISA slots on old 'crossover' motherboards netted a good 15% speed increase at the time. Don't see those anymore, that's for sure...

    59. Re:Bring back the serial port! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      No less rube goldburg that the dance that has to go on between most modern chipsets and most archaic UART chipsets.

      We are just quibbling over whether said converters are soldered to the motherboard or are replaceable external units.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    60. Re:Bring back the serial port! by shepd · · Score: 1

      Just send off an email to the contact info on my website, info (at) beamon.ca, or, better yet, try sales (at) beamon.ca (the one I check). HTH! :-)

      As this is a new product (to us), we don't yet have any info online for it yet...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    61. Re:Bring back the serial port! by f0rt0r · · Score: 1

      How new? My Abit NF7-S board I purchased last week has 2Serial + 1Parallel and PS/2 Keyb/Mouse Ports. Looks like they are still being sold.

      --
      I can't afford a sig!
    62. Re:Bring back the serial port! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Its called a converter. USB is a high-speed, multinode reimplementation of serial ports. It has bandwidth to spare and can incorporate all of the nuances of RS232/422 communication with the right adapters.

      Most of my problems are with the decrepid software that comes with elderly scientific equipment, not the ports.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    63. Re:Bring back the serial port! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Even if you have a RS-232 port on the motherboard, there's no way to unstick a wedged machine, like you can do by sending a break on the serial console of most Sun machines.

      I find the reset switch on the front of the case generally works as well.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    64. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Without the constraints of the old interface standards, chipset manufacturers can eliminate a lot of circuitry, and corresponding hardware interrupts

      Not anytime soon. They can eliminate some traces on the motherboard since they don't need to connect certain pins on the south bridge to an interface, but that's all of 60 lines, all of which are very low speed and a complete non-issue for interference issues. They can't eliminate anything else because it's all bundled into the south bridge now. You'd have to get a chipmaker to produce a south bridge that lacks the circuitry, which is so absurdly minimal that it's not even worth doing -- just producing two different versions of the chip would eliminate any cost savings.

      ISA was quite different as these things went. The bus interface was godawful, and resource sharing was dirt poor.

      And besides, when's the last time you ran into IRQ, DMA, or even address conflicts on a modern PC?

    65. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to run UNIX on one of those things, and I'd like a serial console. In fact, if they had a board that had no video and just serial, that'd be grand, I'd buy one.

      The Soekris net4801 seems pretty similar to this Via board (only a 266Mhz processor though, and the size is 13.2x14.7 cm). It has a serial console instead of video, and is designed for BSD and Linux.

    66. Re:Bring back the serial port! by bofh23 · · Score: 1

      Ahh, A voice of reason!

      The lack of retention in USB connectors
      has always been an annoyance. I've found
      the shape memory in cable jackets tend to
      have enough force to disconnect USB cables
      from hub ports.

      I think a true RS-232 serial port with an
      RJ-45 connector would be a better compromise.

    67. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Chaosrider · · Score: 1
      There seems to have been a bit of interest in the new Mini/Nano motherboards, including postings at /. here, here, and here.

      Looks like it's time to build that MP3 player with the big hard drive for my new Saturn. Damn it, someone beat me to the buzzer. It even has WiFi capability!

    68. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1
      I find the reset switch on the front of the case generally works as well.

      Yes, but the reset switch is hard to press if you're 1000 miles away. The whole point of using a serial console instead of a video console is so you can remotely administer the machine even when it's not reachable via the network by connecting instead to a terminal server or similar device that's wired to the serial console.

    69. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Demodian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This *assumes* there is something automatic about the serial port support over USB in the BIOS that hides this layer. Otherwise, you have to rely upon code to talk to the USB interface. Again, the issue would be "embedded" designs, and not something that you rely on a device driver or API to use.

    70. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently bought a dell inspiron 1100 laptop and found out when I got it that it doesn't have any legacy ports. I kinda though a serial port was a given but I guess not nowadays.

    71. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that's going to be a typical application for this motherboard?

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    72. Re:Bring back the serial port! by lowmagnet · · Score: 1
      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    73. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm.. It has a PS2 KB and a VGA port - whats wrong with those?

    74. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1
      Do you really think that's going to be a typical application for this motherboard?

      Yes. It looks like it'd be useful for embedded applications like alarm systems, card access control, kiosks, and so on. I suspect it would also have excellent potential in high density server applications, like a special rackmount case with two dozen or so of these boards mounted on pull-out cards.

    75. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I guess I'm still not seeing how this complaint is valid or worthwhile

      The smaller the board is,
      the more useful it is for embedded apps,
      where Serial is perhaps even more important
      than on a standard PC.

    76. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know your REALLY into computing when you start to use your com ports again...

    77. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure! The smaller form factor would lend it self to being stuck in a closet, or other small, non-accessable space...

    78. Re:Bring back the serial port! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      For all the trouble of looping this sucker through a terminal server plugged into the web, you could also wire the reset switch to some remotely controlled embedded device. My thought is have a watchdog computer tied to a BASIC-stamp device with a mux connected to the reset switches of a bank of computers. With the right programming, you could close the contact on each computer individually. Said device could also be controlled from a touchtone phone, laser beam, or the DOW Jones Industrial Average.

      Of course, there is also the option of calling your intern 999 miles away and telling him/her to hit the reset switch.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    79. Re:Bring back the serial port! by BSD+Yoda · · Score: 1

      In my car, I find that if I lay the seat all the way back, the female part doesn't eject the male part, regardless of the degree of vibration.

      As far as 'holding in place' I recommend duct tape.

    80. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our new nano-ITX overlords!

    81. Re:Bring back the serial port! by psych031337 · · Score: 1
      Maybe an online petition to bring back the RS-232 is in order :)

      You say this as if an online petition has ever been observed to change a decision...
      --
      +++ath0
    82. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      everything is a stepping stone to a true 'micro' computer

    83. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or power connecter? They didn't mention that in the article... although I would expect the artwork to label it P1... but I can't see the other side..

    84. Re:Bring back the serial port! by TummyX · · Score: 1

      If you're using a Nano-ITX board for an embedded decide I think you'll be using some kind of OS like linux where you will be going thru /dev/* which abstracts off the fact that the serial port is connected to a USB hub. You wouldn't be using direct IO into the serial ports themselves.

      On windows, all applications that use com ports work fine across USB com ports. They can't tell the difference. Same would apply for linux.

    85. Re:Bring back the serial port! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously use old and outdated technology.

  6. 12cm^2 by jimi1283 · · Score: 0

    That's about the size of your un-clenched hand. I want one.

    1. Re:12cm^2 by temojen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      12cm * 12cm == 144cm^2

    2. Re:12cm^2 by dbavirt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who modded the parent insightful?! Can I get modded up for quoting numbers from my calculator? 2 + 2 = 4 7 * 8 = 56

    3. Re:12cm^2 by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Can I get modded up for quoting numbers from my calculator? 2 + 2 = 4 7 * 8 = 56

      I seriously hope you didn't have to use a calculator to come up with those...

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:12cm^2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be silly
      I have hired a british man-servant as a "calculator"...he follows me around and when I need to do some math, I give him the problem and he tells me the answer.
      I don't have the budget for an electronic calculator or even paper and pen so my man-servant has to scratch his fingernails in the dirt to figger out the anser.

      Thomas

  7. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by zedmelon · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I meant to say that the article reads like a marketing meeting with the Startup Dot Com CEO trying to keep his employees from realizing the company is sinking.

    Total Connectivity

    Complete Empowerment.

    Mleh.

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  8. Wonderful! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't say how many times I've wanted to make a small, embedded controller system, but couldn't do it. Most projects need the ability of pc, but can't handle the space requirements for a desktop sized box. These little babies aught to make my life much more fun, and possibly fully automated.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    1. Re:Wonderful! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh yes, one more thing I forgot to write...

      I wonder what kind of power supplies they will release to drive these. I assume a standard power supply will work... but it seems wrong. The power would take up more space the entire workings of the computer. Anyway, for my embedded projects, I really hope they follow with some tiny power supplies.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:Wonderful! by Trigun · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are solid state external power supplies, (usually 55 watt) for sale, and many low-profile cases ship with these as well. You can even buy ones that will run off of a car cigarette lighter. It's only 5 and 12 volts to run everything you need.

    3. Re:Wonderful! by phr1 · · Score: 1

      Try one of this guy's boards.

    4. Re:Wonderful! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      Thanks! That would be ideal.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    5. Re:Wonderful! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 1

      Those are pretty reasonably priced. A bit high for a motherboard, but novelty and hard-to-come-by items are always expensive. I wonder if we can expect similar prices for the Nano-ITX.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    6. Re:Wonderful! by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Speaking of that, my browser pulled up a banner for just such a beast when I was checking out the mini-itx site. Apparently a company called i-tuner sells little power supply daughter boards from 40 to 100 watts. Looks like the way to go if space is that precious, but they're a bit pricey starting at around fifty bucks. Cool for the car though, and they sell little car adapters as well.
      Maybe the battery-less DIY notebook isn't so far off after all.

    7. Re:Wonderful! by dunc78 · · Score: 1

      If you want some kind of embedded computer, check out the PC-104 form factor computers. I believe this form factor is probably smaller than the via motherboard. Also, there are many devices available in this form factor. The whole thrust for the form factor was embedded computing. Visit www.pc104.org for more info.

    8. Re:Wonderful! by pavon · · Score: 1

      If you need to have more power than that, you can also go with a micro ATX power supply. They are about 1/2 the volume of a normal ATX power supply.

    9. Re:Wonderful! by pi42 · · Score: 1

      Looking at the photos, I don't even see a standard ATX power connector, so they must be doing something different and crafty for Nano-ITX.

      Maybe the yellow connector near the VGA?

      Very nifty stuff..

    10. Re:Wonderful! by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1

      PC-104 motherboards are expensive for what you get, because of the small numbers produced. I'm sure these VIA boards will sell for 1/3 to 1/4 the cost of a PC-104 motherboard of equivalent power.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    11. Re:Wonderful! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I like the daughter boards you can buy for mini-ITX systems. Probably these will soon have something similar available. If that'd the case then the power supply will tuck right in and not really take up any more space. Very cool for projects that need to be in tight spaces. I've been waiting for these nano boards to start selling for a while now.. playing with the idea of slipping in a CF and making a lil computer that can fit inside the wall behind a fairly normal looking wallplate (like a lightswitch) with nothing visible except the monitor, speaker, and usb ports.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  9. So please please can we have.. by adeyadey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Genuine cheap DIY clone portables/laptops with interchangable parts - if a component fails, you dont have pay the earth to replace it? Anyone have good links/experience on that? :-)

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:So please please can we have.. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Why was the above post modded down?

    2. Re:So please please can we have.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree... DIY Laptop with this little mini boards would be NICE!

      Down with proprietarity!

      shawn

      -Dont hate me because I cant spell :)

    3. Re:So please please can we have.. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      hmm, a nice suitcase/toolcase (my guitarplaying freind have one that will do if you remove the stuff inside) one mini or nano itx board, lcd screen in the lid and wireless keyboard and mouse, instant lanparty machine:) both mini and nano runs on 12v so just grab a external adapter rather then a internal powersupply or if your a real geek/nerd, make a hydrogen powersupply:) hmm, i swear i read about an idea for using closed hydrogen systems like rechargebal batterys, when you charge you crack the water and when not chargeing run it like any other hydrogen system...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    4. Re:So please please can we have.. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't offtopic you dopes.

      These things, afaik, can run on DC power - so running off batteries shouldn't be out of the question. They'll certainly fit in a laptop sized case. SODIMMS, laptop HDDs, half-height CDroms and stuff can be had.

      As I see it, what keeps the DIY laptop scene from existing is the LCD video interface - there's just no real standard way to do it. Won't someone start mass producing laptop shells, complete with LCDs, inverters, and interface board?

      I wonder what the Dells of the world would do if people could cobble together their own laptops. I read somewhere that portables are fast becoming the biggest chunk of the box brands profits.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:So please please can we have.. by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      instant lanparty machine...

      That is going to be SO hilarious, seeing you play HalfLife 2 on the equivalent of a Celeron 600 with integrated video, while my Athlon XP 1700+, GeForce FX and full ATX case/mobo are playing right next door. For what I believe will be fairly comparable retail prices. :) (Current Mini-ITX with 1GHz C3 are around $200; GeForce FX 5200, ECS mobo and Athlon XP 1700 run about $179 total. Add RAM, Optical, HD, monitor to taste.)

      Serve up whoopass at 75 FPS, while the cute but incredibly weak VIA box surrenders ar 3fps. :)

    6. Re:So please please can we have.. by riedquat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The mini-ITX still needs a normal ATX power supply (+/- 5V, +/- 12V) - generally you will get a solid state power supply that takes 12V as an input which takes up a bit more space.

      I can't even see the power connector on the nano-ITX - if that runs straight off 12V that's great.

    7. Re:So please please can we have.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the board being discussed is missing the interchangable parts discussed in your post.

    8. Re:So please please can we have.. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      They saw what happened to IBM with the PC & don't want to make it easy to make clones.

      I.E. Toshiba would rather charge you 90% of the original price to replace a laptop motherboard (reference Toshiba Satilite 2140 XCDS), than let a clone brand take that sale.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:So please please can we have.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've been reading about pixel shaders and Half Life 2, your GeForce FX will also be getting 3 fps :-)

    10. Re:So please please can we have.. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      hl2 should survive on a 700mhz if the info i have read still holds, but the big problem is that there isnt a dedicated GPU. does hl2 have software rendering?

      anyways, there are plenty of games out there that one can play, you dont allwayshave to play the latest and greatest, just look at quake 1 or 2, hell hl1 allso works. and then there are strategy games, not everyone play shooters...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    11. Re:So please please can we have.. by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i swear i have read about a prebuildt mini-itx based box that hada external transformer rather then a big gray internal one. if the max is 12v needed then it can supply the 5v to, you only have to make sure it can handle the combined watt drain...

      this is if i have not seriously foobared what littile i know about electric current...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    12. Re:So please please can we have.. by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, you can *turn the pixel shaders off*.

      A Radeon 9600 would still be a better alternative for playing HL2 - but the're 2x the price of the GeForceFX 5200.

    13. Re:So please please can we have.. by LookSharp · · Score: 1

      and then there are strategy games, not everyone play shooters...

      You're talking to a guy who just built an AT-cased system running DOS 6.22 to play the original King's Quest Games. And nothing else. :)

      Competitively, I play Quake 3 (Threewave style). It doesn't require a lot to run; my brother's Celeron 533 and TNT2 vidcard can run it fine. The game is 4 years old. But even a 1GHz Via C3, with the northbridge-integrated Savage video chipset, won't be able to render Quake3 very well past 640x480, 16-bit color, and 20 frames per seond. As a comparison, I can push Q3 at about 250FPS on my Athlon XP 2000 and GFFX 5600.

      When someone says "LAN Party," I assume they are playing BF1942, a Clancy game, Counterstrike, or at least Diablo 2. Not Quake 2. Yes a few people still play it, but infrequently tote machines around to play some hot 16-player action in somebody's basement.

    14. Re:So please please can we have.. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      There are already laptops being made from the mini-itx boards. These will just make it possible to produce even smaller laptops and maybe even things like handhelds. If only you could buy screens at an affordable price. It'd probably be cheaper to buy full monitors and just toss the case the monitor came in. If I could find a good touch screen I might do just that. Maybe I can find a broken tablet PC somewhere with a working screen and hack it onto one of these boards.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  10. Slashdotted by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    I think the RS232 is still present : the link is so slow it just has to be over pppd.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  11. Cool! by bazik · · Score: 1

    Great news!

    Gonna wait then for building my multimedia PC until this gets on the market.

    12x12cm is awesome... maybe I buy a 2nd one to build it into the glove box of my car :)

    Anyone got an expected price for this thing?

    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    1. Re:Cool! by pavon · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, but something caught my attention. It only has a mini-PCI connector. Does anyone know of any mini-PCI TV tuner cards? are there mini-PCI to PCI adaptors?

    2. Re:Cool! by gendusoa · · Score: 1

      BOSER makes a Mini-PCI video capture card, though specs are a bit sparse. Link.

  12. Drive bay mounting? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    12 by 12 centimeters (120 millimeters) is the same size as a CD... I wonder if one could squeeze one of these machines into one or two drivebays... I could definetly use a nice little dev box inside my regular box!

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

      12 by 12 centimeters (120 millimeters) is the same size as a CD... I wonder if one could squeeze one of these machines into one or two drivebays

      File the corners and punch a hole in the middle : you won't even have to replace the original CDROM drive to fit in inside your PC.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Drive bay mounting? by DragonWyatt · · Score: 4, Informative

      here ya go:

      TerraSoft's briQ

      Been around for a long time, based on powerpc (350 or 800mhz G3, or 500mhz G4), 168pin DIMMs, VFD display included, and runs linux to boot!

      --
      Don't sweat the petty things. But do pet the sweaty things.
    3. Re:Drive bay mounting? by BusterB · · Score: 1

      The BriQ fits into a drive bay, and supports an internal 2.5 drive. It has 'legacy' connectors too, but it is a PPC, not x86.

    4. Re:Drive bay mounting? by HotshotXV · · Score: 1

      You can always mount it on the bottom as well... most cases have sufficient room left for fans and the like... techincally, you could have one or two 5 1/4 bays going, and then mount another one or two on the bottom of your case... it'd be hot as anything, but you'd also have a lot of power from a desktop box.

    5. Re:Drive bay mounting? by mlk · · Score: 1

      Sun do a PC-on-a-PCI-card.

      But I'm gussing you are after x86 on x86, so why not just use VMWare?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    6. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      But I'm gussing you are after x86 on x86, so why not just use VMWare?

      With VMWare I need a badass machine to run a machine inside of another without having slowdowns in either one. With an actual piece of hardware I can do anything with either box and be sure that the other one won't be affected.

      Another good reason is the fact that two PCs of moderate performance usually cost less than one which is twice as fast. Besides, when using emulation it'd have to be faster than twice as fast.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    7. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      here ya go: TerraSoft's briQ

      Been around for a long time, based on powerpc (350 or 800mhz G3, or 500mhz G4), 168pin DIMMs, VFD display included, and runs linux to boot!


      Nice, but doesn't beat hacking it together yourself ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    8. Re:Drive bay mounting? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it's cool but holy crap at $1245 for the cheapest one it's not THAT cool!!! I guess they're not really targeting the hobbiest with this though.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    9. Re:Drive bay mounting? by standbypowerguy · · Score: 1

      I already have that. You can get it too at www.vmware.com

      --
      This isn't the sig you're looking for... Move along.
    10. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      If you're thinking that the Via C3 is enough for your drive bay you have a solution already:

      http://www.cappuccinopc.com/1baypc.asp

      They even sell them as barebones. There's also a 2-bay one with a P4.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    11. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Wakkow · · Score: 1
      Ya, but look at the specs:
      # PowerPC 750 (G3) or PowerPC 7400 (G4)

      It's a mac! Of course it's expensive!!


      It's a joke. laugh. =)

    12. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and runs linux to boot!

      But I'm looking for a box that can keep running AFTER boot!

      Thanks! I'm here all week! Try the veal!

    13. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Quixote · · Score: 1
      Forget drivebay: a better place would be to mount it in a car, replacing the stock receiver (if the power supply question could be worked out, of course).

    14. Re:Drive bay mounting? by sysadmn · · Score: 1

      Except, of course, that Via boards run $50 - $150 each (w/low end cpu) and the briQ starts at $1500. #include

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    15. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mac eh? Why didn't they just call it iBrique and be done with it?

    16. Re:Drive bay mounting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ampro has been making tiny motherboards for years. (as have other companies, of course)

      I have a board made by them that's exactly the right size, and with mounting holes in the right place, to fit in a 5 1/4" drive bay (dated 1995). Of course it doesn't work, but that's why I have it. :)

      In particular, PC/104-Plus form factor boards are 3.6" x 3.8", which is about 9.1x9.7 cm.

  13. Call the office for fair trading! by killermal · · Score: 1
    1 centimeter = 1x10^-2m, 1 nanometer = 1x10^-9m.

    FALSE ADVERTISING.

    1. Re:Call the office for fair trading! by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Funny

      1 centimeter = 1x10^-2m, 1 nanometer = 1x10^-9m.

      FALSE ADVERTISING.



      But they never specified their units. They only used the prefix nano. But they never said nano-whats. Their unit of distance could be root acres, or astronomical units, or in this case, the unit of measurement is 12cm*10^9

      Heh heh, the devil is in the details my friend.

      --

      Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
    2. Re:Call the office for fair trading! by HotshotXV · · Score: 1

      Yes, in fact they are using nano as the definition of the word, small, rather than using it as the prefix. Besides, no-one ever kicked up a fuss about micro-ATX, now, did they?

    3. Re:Call the office for fair trading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did state the units. nano-itx. so it must be 10^-9 of an itx. which it is clearly not. hence the parent's comment stands.

      Just another anon cow standing up for truth, justice, and the trolling way.

    4. Re:Call the office for fair trading! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 centimeter = 1x10^-2m, 1 nanometer = 1x10^-9m.

      Then what's a minimeter? :)

  14. Woohoo! by CausticWindow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can make that ammo canister pc come true. I could even make Linux run on my MP5!.

    Or what about using a US marines trooper helmet as a webserver! Or maybe I can equip a clip with a fileserver.

    W00t. My Death/Linux dreams have finally come true.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you trying to say? That Americans are fixated on death and destruction? We're not, we just don't like you foreigners.

    2. Re:Woohoo! by LookSharp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Roll your own notebooks!

      Where is the power circuitry? To run from/charge a battery?

      The controller to run a native LCD?

      Be sure to include some room for converters to step down the big IDE down to notebook harddrives and optical drives.

      Oh and that "1 GHz C3?" It has roughly the computational power of a Celeron 600.

      Feel free to invest $1200 in making one of these into a notebook with an LCD, but I'd just assume spend $1000 on a Dell 2GHz and plenty more expansion and connectivity options.

    3. Re:Woohoo! by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

      Hey, Mr. Electron:

      Perhaps this will encourage other manufacturers to make those devices.

    4. Re:Woohoo! by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Makes for the more realistic counterstrike...not only are you running around with an MP5, but your running on one as well. Perhaps you could add some gyro mouse to your mp5 so you use it to aim as well :)

    5. Re:Woohoo! by Nugget · · Score: 1
      "I'd just assume..."

      you're on the list

    6. Re:Woohoo! by iainl · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't have the link to hand, but the music section of last Sunday's Observer newspaper had a review of an mp3 player built into the ammo cartridge of an AK-47; will that do?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    7. Re:Woohoo! by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      If US marines trooper helmets are webservers...or networked at all...I say we backdoor these!

      Think of all the xdcc bots we could have!

      Or how big our DDOS net would be!

      And really...how will the American government prosecute the marines!

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    8. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the heads up. I was not aware that I was using an incorrect phrase. Being a bit of a grammar nazi myself, I actually appreciate learning these things.

      On the other hand, the moderators may not be so kind to your post. :)

    9. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so we could have a beowulf cluster of US marines?

      or maybe thats how verizon does their coast to coast walkie talkies (come on...youve seen the commercial...all those antennalopes? oh nevermind)

    10. Re:Woohoo! by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

      Like this?
      http://www.mini-itx.com/projects/ammobox/

      --
      Waiting for an amusing sig.
    11. Re:Woohoo! by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      so would that have to be GNU/GUN Linux? talk about confusing the masses...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    12. Re:Woohoo! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      They already have 3 ammo can projects at mini-itx.com. I'd give you a link, but the server has apparently been turned to slag.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I can make that ammo canister pc come true.

      You mean like this?

    14. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I cannot comment on the actual soliders' feelings, I doubt the "backdooring" of Marines is not the New Navy that the DoD though they were getting...

    15. Re:Woohoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm gonna make a print server from a US marine trooper's skull.

    16. Re:Woohoo! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Nextel, and their ads are:

      Antennalopes (antennas instead of antlers)
      Pigeons (with antennas on their legs)
      Antenna (400,000 feet tall)

    17. Re:Woohoo! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Maybe not for a notebook. I had an EPIA and I kept it in the trunk of my car. When I needed to fix totally borked client's machines I just hooked them up to the EPIA.

      The small form factor makes these things easy enough to carry around in a totebag or in your car. I know I travel to different sites every day, often several times each day. These things let me set up 'camp' in an empty cube and still do all my freakish technical work.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    18. Re:Woohoo! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Have some hacker spirit man. Just cus something is cheaper doesn't make it better. You could make yourself a laptop unlike what anyone else has. Maybe throw out the screen, keyboard, and dorky mouse nipples and use iGlasses and a nifty wireless one handed keyboard/mouse combo. ;)

      You haven't used one of these obviously. My mini-itx system with 933Mhz C3 processor can easily keep up with a 1Ghz Celeron processor. The CPU itself may not be quite as fast but with the mobo designed so tightly with the CPU it seems to give it the little boost needed to compete. By running Linux instead of Windows you can compete a 933Mhz C3 with more like a 1.2Ghz Celeron.

      The power usage of the C3 also kicks the ass of the Celeron. You'd get better battery life and not scorch your manly parts if you left your laptop sitting on your lap.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  15. top brown by Garyman99 · · Score: 1

    my toaster case mod can finally become more than a fantasy!

    1. Re:top brown by Garyman99 · · Score: 1

      ... don't even think about it, I've already submitted the patent.

    2. Re:top brown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I want to build a linux machine in a hollowed out dildo.

    3. Re:top brown by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      I take it you've not seen Red Dwarf, otherwise you'd know how dangerous it is to add any kind of CPU to a toaster :)

    4. Re:top brown by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      I've patented the process of patenting a cpu in a toaster in order to prevent yourself from making one.

      Please transfer $1 to the nearest coke machine and recieve a small metal cylinder as a receipt.

    5. Re:top brown by 14cfr01 · · Score: 1

      Heck, my toast case mod has finally become reality!!

    6. Re:top brown by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      They already have one of these at mini-itx.com w/ instructions. Too bad the server is dead.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  16. Modding ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We thought it had all been done, but now... Imagine a pc modded into a small case, that would be cool.

  17. legacy free by exseven · · Score: 1

    that board is so legacy free it doesnt even need a power adapter (although it does have a fan header) - that or i am blind

    1. Re:legacy free by rabbar · · Score: 1

      The power connector can be seen right next to the IDE connector. It's not a standard ATX power connector.

    2. Re:legacy free by Demodian · · Score: 1

      My guess is the little blue header/connector in the corner next to the via chip.

  18. Woohoo! by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Roll your own notebooks!

  19. MIRROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an old mirror:

    no wait, it's here

  20. Whats Next? by PaulGrimshaw · · Score: 1

    What is it with marketing types? First the "mini" and now "nano"... I spose next will be "subatomic"?

    1. Re:Whats Next? by beezly · · Score: 1

      Duh, Pico-ATX, Femto-ATX, Atto-ATX, Zepto-ATX and Yocto-ATX

      With Nano-ATX being 70% the size of Mini ATX, does that mean...

      Pico ATX will be 8.4cm,
      Femto ATX will be 5.9cm,
      Atto ATX will be 4.1cm,
      Zepto ATX will be 2.9cm
      and Yocto ATX will be a tiny 2.0cm!

    2. Re:Whats Next? by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

      Zepto ATX will be 2.9cm

      can't wait for the Groucho-ATX, and the Harpo-ATX to come out.

      --
      My keyboads not woking popely.
  21. Lunchbox PC by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 1

    Put this in a generic plastic lunchbox, replace the front with a smallish (say 10") LCD, room in there for a laptop hard drive and a CD/DVD... Pc on the go. Only "big" part is the mouse and the keyboard, and those aren't that big anymore.

    Cool.

    1. Re:Lunchbox PC by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Forget a generic plastic lunchbox, put this thing in a Superman or Batman lunchbox like we took to school as kids and THAT would be cool. Maybe still be room in there for a PB/J and a twinkie too.

      Bluetooth the mouse and a tiny keyboard, cut a hole for the 8" LCD on the back side and you would be all set.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:Lunchbox PC by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Roll-up keyboard and a touchpad. Both could fit IN the lunchbox. Actually, my logitech trackball would fit in there too...

      And never underestimate the power of a touchscreen.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  22. I STILL HATE MARKETERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are we going to have to deal with "nano" as the new XTreme??? Nano means "really really small" (I know, shut up) not "sort of tiny compared to the other ones." 24 square centimeters is not "nano" (again, I know, shut up). 24 square nanometers, now that I might call a nano motherboard. Ghyea.

  23. more info by klocwerk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mini-itx was 17x17 centimeters, this is 12x12, so 5cm (or about 2 inches) smaller than a mini-itx.

    The RAM slot looks like it takes laptop ram, not stadard desktop DIMMs.
    The cpu is a 1Ghz C3 processor, hardwired in (no upgrading that once purchased).
    3 sound jacks, ethernet (mini-itx vias are 10/100, i assume this is), 2 USB, video out, PS2 keyboard jack, and a TV output. mouse would have to be via USB.

    I love my mini-itx server, which is completely silent running, this thing is even tinier, but with a 1ghz cpu i'll be interested to see if they can make a fanless model. the 1ghz mini-itx boards don't passively cool without gluing on a Zalman flower heatsink.

    [/itx-geek]

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:more info by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

      What I find amazing is that the figgin' thing is so small that they had to mount the BIOS Battery *VERTICALLY*!

    2. Re:more info by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


      Mini-itx was 17x17 centimeters, this is 12x12, so 5cm (or about 2 inches) smaller than a mini-itx.

      You're looking at it wrong: Mini-ITX 17^2 = 289 cm^2, this board 12^2 = 144 cm^2. It's just less than half the size, quite a feat.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    3. Re:more info by ecloud · · Score: 1

      Is that a CF slot I see on the back?

      This board is so simple! Amazing how much green space there is on the top without any components.

      Is that little blue 7-pin connector for power?

    4. Re:more info by laird · · Score: 1

      The slot on the back looks like RAM to me.

      I have no idea what the blue 7-pin connector is -- I've never seen that connector before.

      There's what looks like a normal 4-pin power connector (4-pins, keyed, white plastic) towards the middle of the board from the battery.

      And you're right -- it is amazing how clean this board is. They make it looks like they could easily compress it another 1-2 cm!

    5. Re:more info by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      "The RAM slot looks like it takes laptop ram, not stadard desktop DIMMs."

      Yes, that's what a SODIMM is, as shown in what the slashdot 'story' said "moved to mini-PCI and SODIMMs"

    6. Re:more info by hattig · · Score: 1

      On the back is mini-PCI.

      The blue connector is Serial ATA.

      Yes, this 12cm by 12cm board can support 5 IDE devices, 4 off of the PATA connectors, and 1 of the SATA connector. However I imagine that the PATA connectors are there for IDE flash memory.

      I'd imagine the final design would have 2 SATA connectors, as the southbridge on that board supports that.

    7. Re:more info by oolon · · Score: 1

      How oftain do you upgrade processor and not the mother board? An old processor without a mother board is useless. A new processor without a new motherboard can really hold it back, unless its a really small and probably useless speed bump.

      James

    8. Re:more info by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2, Funny

      the 1ghz mini-itx boards don't passively cool without gluing on a Zalman flower heatsink

      Does this mean the heat sink will take up more volume than the actual motherboard?

    9. Re:more info by ecloud · · Score: 1

      I think the one on the back is the Mini PCI - now that I read about that a bit. There are 3 form-factors for MiniPCI cards, and the edge-connector type (Type III) is the most popular apparently. You can buy a triple-standard WiFi card to stick in it, which is supported with Linux:

      http://www.discountechnology.com/products/wistro n- 802.11abg/Acer_NeWeb_802.11a%2Bb%2Bg_mini_pci.htm

      The little blue connector is SATA apparently.

      And the little white connector is close to the CPU so is probably a typical fan connector.

      I still haven't figured out which one is the power connector.

    10. Re:more info by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

      TV out?! Sweet! Okay, use the afformentioned lunch box (a few posts up), USB-Serial dongle, an IR reciever, 200GB HD (or 2 of them), DVD-ROM drive, and some ripping software (cladDVD and Dr. DivX). Get a good universal remote for it and you have a portable movie player (how many DivX movies can you rip onto a 200GB drive?). Throw in a TV tuner card and you have a PVR in a lunch box. Make the DVD-ROM a DVD-RW and you have a sweet setup. All by remote control on any TV. Of course, you'd have to write your own UI for it so you could read everything on the TV screen, but it would be a sweet setup!

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
    11. Re:more info by FlexAgain · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...<snip>...), 2 USB, video out, PS2 keyboard jack, and a TV output. mouse would have to be via USB.

      Actually, it looks like the connector that you think is a PS2 keyboard port is actually an S-Video connector (vs composite video from the Phono above).

      So, you'ld probably need a USB Keyboard as well.

      --
      Actually it is rocket science...
    12. Re:more info by klocwerk · · Score: 0, Redundant

      i was thinking that at first, and said "that'd be fucking dumb to put on no ps2 ports.
      but they did. >_

      --

      "You worthless post!"
      -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
  24. Re:ally Wonderful! by lanswitch · · Score: 0

    Not only that, but I expect a lot of new small boxes based on this (and similar) board. Think about multimedia-boxes, gameconsoles, routers/firewalls tablet-size pc's and so on.
    Next step in evolution I guess, but an interesting one. This will make large-scale computer-based home appliances easier to produce, and thus cheaper to buy.

  25. Mirror here! by bazik · · Score: 5, Informative
    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
  26. Me too! by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

    Actually, the SODIMMS are real hard to change; I'd prefer they use SOBRIGHTS.

    1. Re:Me too! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      SOBRIGHTS burn my fingers when I change them.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:Me too! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Wait till they're burned out before you change them. Or turn off the light switch first.

    3. Re:Me too! by jdray · · Score: 1

      Achieving daily SOBRIGHTy is a laudable goal.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    4. Re:Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You means SOBs got rights aswell?!

  27. I smell some burning... by thadeusPawlickiROX · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I hope they weren't using a prototype of the new motherboard as a webserver... cause if they did it just melted.

    --
    take off every sig for great justice
  28. Could anyone please post the images here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the site wont let me at them! :O

    R

  29. Re:ally Wonderful! by lanswitch · · Score: 0

    please replace large-scale with mass-produced...

  30. Size by Txurlo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, that's exactly the size of a CD jewel case.

    Pretty nifty, huh?

    --
    Txurlo
    1. Re:Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without having a ruler at hand, I estimate a CD case to be about 11 x 12 cm. 132 cm.

      Whatever the exact measurements, a CD case is NOT 12 cm.

    2. Re:Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamn Slashcode, it ate the square "2".

      CD case ~ 130 cm^2
      CD case != 12 cm^2

      .
      .
      .
      .
      .
      Slow Down Cowboy!

      Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

      Chances are, you're behind a firewall or proxy, or clicked the Back button to accidentally reuse a form. Please try again. If the problem persists, and all other options have been tried, contact the site administrator.

    3. Re:Size by Scyber · · Score: 1

      Well according to the original poster, this board is 12cm X 12cm which is 144cm^2. can't get to the article at the moment.

    4. Re:Size by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      Nope - Jewel cases aren't 12x12cm and aren't even square.

      It's much more like the size of the paper inserts in the cover of a Jewel case (which is a couple of mm less than a 12x12 square).

      Nick...

    5. Re:Size by reve · · Score: 1

      > Actually, that's exactly the size of a CD jewel case.

      Well golly. I guess that means for my next server rack I can just go get one of those CD storage towers.

      --
      -- r . m o s q u i t o --
  31. Check yo maff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    144 square ce'miters, blowhard.

  32. Size is 17cm x 17 cm by lcsjk · · Score: 1

    Unless I missed something, the Via website says the size of these boards is 17cm x 17 cm. That's 6.7 x 6.7 inches.

    1. Re:Size is 17cm x 17 cm by bryanthompson · · Score: 1

      17x17 cm has been the standard itx board size, this one's a wee bit smaller.

      From epiacenter.com:
      Size: 12x12cm

    2. Re:Size is 17cm x 17 cm by CyberKnet · · Score: 1

      wee bit smaller? You're looking at it the wrong way...

      It's a lot smaller. As in half the size.
      12cm^2 = 12cm x 12cm = 144
      17cm^2 = 17cm x 17cm = 289

      To me, 50% reduction in total board size is more than just a wee bit. Personally I find it pretty impressive.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  33. nano nano! (in a Mork voice) by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

    Theres nothing wrong with calling this board 'Nano' ... it is after all

    120,000,000 x 120,000,000 nanometers in size, or

    14,400,000,000,000,000 square nanometers in area.

    Its nano .. it's just that it takes a lot o nano's.

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  34. Better pictures here by EriktheGreen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Better pics of a nano-itx board from VIA

    Google - it's not just for breakfast any more.

    Erik

  35. More more info - Re:more info by bazik · · Score: 5, Informative


    According to this page, the shown Nano-ITX board got the following details:

    - VIA CN400 Chipsatz (FSB 200 Support)
    - 1 GHz VIA C3
    - VIA VT8237 Southbridge (support for S-ATA)
    - Mini-PCI on the back (maybe for WLAN)
    - 1x SODIMM RAM Slot
    - 1x S-ATA (one Channel)
    - 2x IDE (ATA 133)
    - TV-Out
    - 6-Channel Sound
    - DOC (disk-on-chip)
    - Size: 12x12 cm
    - CPU-Size: 15x15 mm

    --


    --
    One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    1. Re:More more info - Re:more info by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Now if only they would anounce pricing, we would have all the specs that matter. Oh, and they really need to sneak a 1394 PHY into the chipset. Personally I'd be happy with a machine with no SATA and with 1394 onboard. Adding 1394 is likely to be expensive what with the only suitable expansion being minipci. Maybe when PCI-Express rolls out they'll make a board with a 1X connector.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:More more info - Re:more info by Apreche · · Score: 1

      Looking at these specs I see one really really good use. Set top box. use the Mini-PCI to put in a TV-IN. Use the SATA for a 3.5" hard drive of 80 or 120gigs. Insert best ram stick that will fit. Make nice little box for it to go in. Put the little thing on top of the tv, install software, the end. Use LAN to transfer files to/from it. Install mplayer also for playing downloaded goods. This sure beats all those people I know with mid-towers next to their televisions.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    3. Re:More more info - Re:more info by hattig · · Score: 1

      Wow ... they need to nano-bga the chipset as well and there'll be plenty of space to incorporate all the features of the southbridge (the same that is appearing on the latest A64 and A64FX VIA motherboards).

      Stick an optical output on there as well and I'll be a happy bunny.

      I like how the Mini-PCI is mounted underneath the board.

      All we need now are 1.8" Hard Drives with SATA interfaces! And Nano-ITX cases with suitable power supplies.

    4. Re:More more info - Re:more info by bazik · · Score: 1


      All we need now are 1.8" Hard Drives with SATA interfaces! And Nano-ITX cases with suitable power supplies.

      Here you go! :-)

      --


      --
      One by one the penguins steal my sanity...
    5. Re:More more info - Re:more info by pergamon · · Score: 1

      A big question there is what the TV-OUT quality is going to be....

    6. Re:More more info - Re:more info by gonar · · Score: 1

      why the hell go to all the trouble to make this small and not go all the way to SATA only, or at least laptop formfactor IDE?

      the 10 cm^2 wasted on IDE connectors could be cut to 2 w/SATA or 6 w/ laptopIDE

      after all, wouldn't you want to put this in a box w/a laprop HD and slimline CD to create a box the size of a stack of 4 jewelcases?

      btw, where's the power in? I couldn't spot any power supply connectors...

      --
      The difference between Theory and Practice is greater in Practice than in Theory.
    7. Re:More more info - Re:more info by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Just use a IDE-to-CF adapter and plug a compact flash drive in. Can't get much smaller than that.

    8. Re:More more info - Re:more info by the_psilo · · Score: 1

      From the mini-itx site with pictures:

      ...but from our blurred photographs this version looks to have a VT8237 South Bridge, SODIMM RAM slot, SATA connector, 2 x IDE connectors, (1) PS/2 connector, TV-Out...

      Actually, it looks to me like there is a composite and s-video TV out and no PS/2 connector. The specs that bazik posted from epia-center seem to confirm this as well.

      aloha
      psilo

    9. Re:More more info - Re:more info by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      1.8" would still be better. I think the granparent poster was thinking along the lines of a cardbus/PC Type 1 size. but 2.5 will obviously fit just fine :)

      2.5" SATA is very sexy.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    10. Re:More more info - Re:more info by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      If the EPIA M 10000 is any sign, it'll be on par with the EPIA M series.

    11. Re:More more info - Re:more info by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I see an Ethernet on there too.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  36. VIA eh by MagPulse · · Score: 1

    Too bad this wasn't done by a manufacturer that makes quality products, or this might actually be useful.

    1. Re:VIA eh by Tisephone · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! Everyone knows a CPU's quality is directly proportional to the amount of heat it dissipates. And you can't even soft-boil an egg on a C3, let alone fry one... what a piece of junk.

      Can't wait for the Prescott!

      --
      "Neque enim lex est aequior ulla, quam necis artifices arte perire sua."
    2. Re:VIA eh by Judg3 · · Score: 1

      I feel they make quality products - at least in the Mini-ITX formfactor (haven't tried anything else of theirs, except MB chipsets of course).

      I've used several of their Mini-ITX boards for projects, and haven't had any problems yet. I find that for the size and power, they are actually pretty powerful. No, you can't play the latest games on them (or any other game for that matter hehe), no you can't play high quality DivX or encode music on the lower models (You can on the new ones though, like the M8000 and M10000).
      But they are quiet, fit into almost anything (I'm half done modding a VCR to accept the newer Via M10000 Mini-ITX board. When done I'll have a completely functional nearly silent and hidden HTPC next to the TV on the AV shelf, complete with a working VCR), and can handle most jobs you need done. Drop a 3ware 8 port SATA RAID card into it's available PCI slot and you have an excellent fileserver.

      --
      Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
    3. Re:VIA eh by MagPulse · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to their crappy chipsets, which made me chuck a motherboard+CPU to switch to Intel. Check out this FAQ that I basically know by heart, and even that monster list of bugs and incompatibilities couldn't save my machine from instability. I'm stuck on a P3 now because of the money I wasted on that thing.

      I can't wait for Prescott because it'll push P4 prices down in to my range.

    4. Re:VIA eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and an ABIT FAQ has what to do with this?

    5. Re:VIA eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      via chips... dumn ass

  37. Dang it... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 3, Informative
    mini-PCI and SODIMMs would be sweet! Had I only known I'da waited. Instead I bought from Axion Tech the CL series VIA EPIA Mini-itx mobo. This little jewel has dual LANs & 4 serials! Read it! FOUR serials!

    That's room for console access, small serial LCD & serial GPS unit. Hmmm..That's one extra serial slot! w00T. BTW, Axion is cheaper than Idot.

    --
    LFS. Have you built your system today?
    1. Re:Dang it... by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the LCD and VFDs via serial are the only use I could possibly come up for keeping them around. even so, there has to be a way to do this via a usb header.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    2. Re:Dang it... by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, Orbital now does USB (there appears to be a header on this board for 'front' USB) and there are so many other ways of remotely hitting boxes without using RS-232. Hell, I haven't used RS-232 for about 5 years.

      --
      Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
    3. Re:Dang it... by QwkHyenA · · Score: 1
      There is. They've made those wierd USB to Serial converters. Some dongle looking device that interfaces between the two.

      I forgot to mention that I've also got a basic stamp that I'm planning on attaching as well. The basic stamp is made by parallax. It has 16 I/O channels on it! GL 2 U!

      --
      LFS. Have you built your system today?
  38. I wish these had LCD control by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Where can I get a minipci card with LCD control? I'm going to want to use a TFT display with this and I don't want an analog stage between display card and flat panel. Advantech offers socket 370 systems with LCD control in a similar size (longer in one direction) but they cost way way WAY too much. I expect this to be considerably more affordable, in the realm of mini-itx, though with memory costing more since it's on SODIMM.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:I wish these had LCD control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't Analog VGA be considered "Legacy too"

  39. Exactly! by sterno · · Score: 1

    Offtopic? Hardly. Having general pupose motherboards in this form factor makes them ideal for dropping into a laptop size case. It was exactly what I thought of when I saw this article.

    It would be awesome to have a laptop that's as cheaply and readily upgradeable as a desktop PC. It would be awesome if I could drop in a new video card or processor into my laptop.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
    1. Re:Exactly! by adeyadey · · Score: 1

      My sentiments too. Ok, maybe a DIY clone portable isnt going to be quite as sleek as the best laptops, but wow, just imagine a genuine portable you can mod cheaply! The key maybe a shell that can take a nano-itx - or something like it. The shell provides the keyboard, LCD, and places/slots/holes for all the other bits.. Even if its a bit bigger than most portables, thats cool - particularly if that means room inside for all the bits you othewrwise have dangling off bits of wire with a normal laptop. Has this been properly done? If so, I havent seen it.

      And, no I cant figure why my original post was modded down to start either. Oh well.

      --
      "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    2. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be awesome if I could drop in a new video card or processor into my laptop.

      RTFA, you ignorant fuck. Neither the video card nor the processor can be upgraded on this board.

    3. Re:Exactly! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You'd have to do some pretty serious Voodoo, on the video output to get it to work with the LCD.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:Exactly! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Bzzt: Wrong.

      They can be upgraded, by a MB swap. Elegant, no;possible, yes.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    5. Re:Exactly! by hitmark · · Score: 1

      hmm, check the pics, i belive one of the plug is the good old analog video. oh and i do belvie that you get lcd screens today that can allso handle svideo...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    6. Re:Exactly! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Yeah but they aren't quite the same as what goes in a laptop. I've already looked into replacing the Mobo of my NEC Versa 2480MT with a mini-itx board. After the cost of the VGA/LCD converter it would be cheaper to get a new laptop.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:Exactly! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      No, you just buy an LCD that has analog inputs. I have one such unit on my desk (and am posting on Slashdot through it.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:Exactly! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Then it's not a laptop is it?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    9. Re:Exactly! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      No, it's a desktop. But rip the base off, it could be used as a screen for a portable.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    10. Re:Exactly! by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You just gave me an idea. One of the officers at the company I work for foolishly put a laptop (but it was in a padded case!) through baggage during a trip a year or 2 ago, ruined the screen. I'm wondering if I can remove the screen, rip out the guts & drop a mini-itx or other small form factor mobo in it & have a working portable PC, minus a screen of course.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  40. "Legacy" ports? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    I would, instead, say that RS232 ports have stood the Test of Time, and continue to do so. Personally, I would never buy ANY motherboard or PC that did not include at least two basic serial ports (either 232 or 422, I don't care which).

    The (bad) assumption that VIA is making, of course, is that everyone will be using an OS that supports USB, and that if people need serial ports they'll use a USB-to-RS232 converter. However, the only OS's I know of that support USB to a degree that it's usable are Windows 2000 and XP, some releases of Linux, and FreeBSD.

    While that covers a lot of ground, it still locks out specialized applications, such as those in the industrial arena, which need hardware-based serial ports. It also locks out good ole' DOS (unless someone's come up with a USB driver for DOS...?)

    Before the Bronx cheers start, let me say that there's still plenty of low-level and specialized applications that use DOS. In fact, much of the programming software for Motorola and GE radios depends on it BECAUSE IT DOESN'T NEED WINDOWS COMPLEXITY AND BLOAT!!!

    There are also plenty of devices Out There, including lots of networking and test equipment, that depend on, or can be more easily worked with through, communication over a basic serial port and 'dumb terminal' emulator on a PC. Don't even get me started on the numerous items of amateur radio hardware that use a serial port for communications and control.

    I can only assume, based on this latest news, that VIA is simply not interested in selling to market segments where "legacy" ports are still required. Fair enough. I'll stick to "real" motherboards, and VIA can stick to their goodies.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:"Legacy" ports? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      You dont want VIA hardware for industrial applications. It's not like a plant manager is going to want the QC data acquisition device to fit into an ET dolls ass and make his eyes light up blue.

      I wouldnt trust VIAs cheap stuff in an industrial setting, myself. I'd look at stuff from folks like Tyan or Crommel or others who make truly industrial FlexATX hardware.

      These are geared for little multimedia HTPC types of applications.

      I've never been all that impressed with mini-itx, because it's not much smaller than FlexATX, and has a lot less horsepower. But these suckers are small enough I could build a mini PC to fit into a drive bay.

      I'm imagining one of those PSOne LCD's built into the side of my case, with a flexible keyboard attached beneath it, a little mini PC in there, and I could, umm, i dunno, I'll find someone in marketing to figure out what it's used for.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:"Legacy" ports? by hattig · · Score: 1

      I would hope that such a small system would come with a header on the motherboard for adding a serial port, and also an IrDA header for infrared. Hopefully said header will be a standard shape, so it doesn't cost $30 to get a cable to interface with it, and a standard serial-LCD will be pluggable-in at the very least.

      However considering that all of 1% of people probably need serial these days ... I bet that VIA really care. A lot. Lots and lots and lots and lots. A serial port is a large connector to add to such a small system.

    3. Re:"Legacy" ports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop whining about the absence of legacy ports ...

      If you need RS232 just buy a board that supports it.

    4. Re:"Legacy" ports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB drivers are showing up in various BIOSs. Surely someone could make a set of drivers that would work for the default USB devices. If a bios can handle the KB, Mouse, and HD, you either bypass the dos drivers or someone could make a simple suite of dos drivers for complient devices.

    5. Re:"Legacy" ports? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I'm imagining one of those PSOne LCD's built into the side of my case, with a flexible keyboard attached beneath it, a little mini PC in there, and I could, umm, i dunno, I'll find someone in marketing to figure out what it's used for.

      A Playstation emulator?

    6. Re:"Legacy" ports? by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 1

      I can only assume, based on this latest news, that VIA is simply not interested in selling to market segments where "legacy" ports are still required. Fair enough. I'll stick to "real" motherboards, and VIA can stick to their goodies.

      Well yeah, (or at least it's not a market for this release.) This is about like bitching that Alienware does not make $500 machines for college students to write their term papers on. If you want a low-power ITX, there is always the EPIA with serial and parallel.

    7. Re:"Legacy" ports? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Why not demand the system run CP/M too while you are at it?

      You could easily run Linux and run your old DOS apps through an emulator. To tell you the truth, the Linux DOS emulators are starting to work better than the Windows DOS emulator.

      I there are that many GE and Motorola radios, odds are someone has already written replacement software the runs natively under Linux.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:"Legacy" ports? by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      "I there are that many GE and Motorola radios, odds are someone has already written replacement software the runs natively under Linux."

      You're missing the point. The examples I gave were only one small facet of the versatility of serial ports. My point is why get rid of them altogether when it costs practically nothing to at least provide a ten-pin Berg header for one.

      In any case, you're incorrect. There is no Linux package for doing the radio programming I mention because the programming protocols are 102% proprietary, and have never been made available in such a way that open source could take advantage of them.

      Latest is not always greatest. If you want to get one of these stripped-down boxes, be my guest. I'm merely pointing out that VIA is targeting an awfully narrow market segment as opposed to more general-purpose machines.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

  41. If they can build a 12cm x 12cm motherboard.... by voss · · Score: 1

    why not create a ATX tower box with a built in cluster,putting Motherboards on PCI Cards all working together. Imagine 5 PCI card motherboards working in tandem with the main motherboard.

    1. Re:If they can build a 12cm x 12cm motherboard.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... you'd never be able to heat-sink that. You would need the mother of all fans to keep it from melting. Apart from that - great idea.

    2. Re:If they can build a 12cm x 12cm motherboard.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Umm, I think that already exists. Granted, it works better on ISA (which can take MANY more slots), but it's possible.

  42. Re:Mini-ITX is 17x17, Nano is 12x12 by lcsjk · · Score: 0

    My bad! Read the wrong specs.

  43. Legacy? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    If they ditched legacy connectors, why do they have 2 parallel ATA connectors? They have a Serial ATA connector, so obviously they have SATA capabilities.

    They might have made it smaller, or kept a serial port, had they ditched the huge PATA connectors that waste so much space.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Legacy? by xyote · · Score: 1

      One sata connector is strange. I thought all the sata controllers were 2 channels or better. The main problem with PATA is the cables. Even rounded cables would be problematic. With this design you have to position the PATA drive just so and use a short PATA ribbon cable flat against side of the case in order to stay out of the way. Hopefully they add a second SATA port by the time this hits production.

      xyote
      Remember work?

  44. TS1000? by slusich · · Score: 1

    How long before somebody tries to squeeze this thing into an old Timex-Sinclair 1000?

    1. Re:TS1000? by wobedraggled · · Score: 1

      Way ahead of ya :)

      --
      Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  45. No SATA??? by phatcat625 · · Score: 1

    Had they included an SATA controller ononboard they might have been able to make it even smaller. You can theoretically attatch a SATA to ATA converter for use with a CD-Rom right?

    1. Re:No SATA??? by sxpert · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA you idiot, what do you think the small blue connector here is ?

    2. Re:No SATA??? by hattig · · Score: 1

      What do you think that SATA header on the motherboard is for?!

    3. Re:No SATA??? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      See the little blue plug (the L-shaped one)?

      That's SATA

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
  46. Re:One of the benefits of propreitary technology by sterno · · Score: 1

    This is a total troll, but I feel like a legit response for it. The thing is, open source isn't the best at making new things, agreed. However, it is wonderful for commoditizing of something. Operating systems, word processors, etc, are all things that have been around for decades and aren't evolving at a fast pace. Therefore, it makes perfect sense for these things to be open source.

    There will always be room at the bleeding edge for proprietary solutions.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  47. This is quite silly, see below. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    During our summer vacation this year, my wife and I amused ourselves by taking leisurely drives in Ohio and photographing every diamond-shaped highway sign that we saw along the roadsides. (Well, not every sign; only the distinct ones.) For provenance, I also stood at the base of each sign and measured its GPS coordinates.

    This turned out to be even more fun than a scavenger hunt, so we filled in some gaps when we returned to California, thereby proving my theorem of creating 12x12cm motherboards which dissipate heat rapidly, which can be found in LaTeX format on my website.

    Sincerely,

    Donald E. Knuth

  48. Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these... by slyckshoes · · Score: 1

    In a shoebox!

    Seriously, it would be neat to have a couple of these things sitting around for various projects. You could put a DB on one, apache on another, an appserver on three of the others, and get a feeling for what it's like to be one of the big boys. You could test various load balancing schemes, redundancy options, etc.

    1. Re:Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ooohhhhh,

      Must build cluster, must build cluster, must build...

      Damn, these incessant voices wont quit.

  49. Mirror in English! by otter42 · · Score: 1
    --
    www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
  50. Slashdotted... by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

    I got a connection refused when trying to connect. Here's an ASCII-art mirror of the motherboard:


    []


    Man, that's small!

  51. Size doesn't matter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not the size of the MoBo, it's what you do with it...

    Sorry, someone had to say it:P

  52. No ethernet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the deal breaker for me, for any projects I would need something like this for. I absolutely must have ethernet. And I don't want to waste the miniPCI for it either, since I'll be using that for other stuff.

    1. Re:No ethernet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it does

    2. Re:No ethernet! by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      The first picture shows an ethernet port but I can not read specs due to /. effect on the page.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    3. Re:No ethernet! by kryliss · · Score: 1

      If worst comes to worst you could always use a USB ethernet device, but one thing that would really make this thing nice is a PCMCIA card slot(s)

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
  53. What kind of power supply? by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    What does this thing use for power? I'm assuming the one blue connector is the power hookup, but what does one hookup to it?

    Translation: how do I put one of these in my car and get juice to it?

    1. Re:What kind of power supply? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Odds are it's has pins with +/1 12V and +/- 5V (or +/- 3.3 V).

      Figure out which pin is which, and you could build a power supply yourself. An AC adaptor is a little easier than a car adapter, because you can ramp AC voltage up and down with a transformer. DC voltage changes require some parlor tricks. I'll describe AC voltage conversion first.

      The first stage is a transformer that takes the voltage from 120VAC (in N America) or 240VAC (just about everywhere else) and steps it down to about 24VAC. Once you have the voltage right, we need to convert the current from AC, or Alternative Curren, a wave bouncing between positive and negative to DC, or Direct Current, a constant stream of electrons.

      We use a parlor trick of 4 diodes and some resitors known as a wheatstone bridge. This bridge only lets current flow one way, and actually caputures the reverse current too. The resulting waveform is a triangle. This is not very useful, as our circuitry would keep dropping out at the low points.

      Enter the capacitor. We put a big capacitor in series to catch these bursts of current and smooth them out. You still have some dips and sags though. To smooth them, behind the capacitor place a voltage regulator. The voltage regulator chops off any excess voltage, and shunts it to ground (and heat.)

      At the end you have a smooth 24V DC waveform.

      To go from 24VDC to +/- 12VDC and +/- 3.3 VDC we use a trick called voltage division. We use 4 resistors (A,B,C,D) to divide up the voltage into the parts we need. A and D are the same resistance, as are B an C. We wire them in series:

      <- REGULATOR

      +24 ------ +12VDC
      D
      --- +3.3VDC
      C
      --- GND
      B
      --- -3.3VDC
      A
      GND ------ -12VDC

      D and A are identical, as are C and B. The ratio of the voltage between A/D and B/C are 12:3.3, with the smaller resistors being B and C.

      Take those 5 nodes, wire them to a connector, and viola.

      For a car adapter you have to devise a slightly more complicated devices: a DC-DC converter. Actually, its a DC-AC-DC converter, but in this blackbox world no one really wants to be bothered with implementation details.

      We start off with 12VDC (assuming your battery, alternator, and groundwire are all in good shape.) We need to convert that to 24VDC. Now a layman might say "use a transformer", but we can't. AC transformers work because alternating current generates a magnetic field. By coiling the wire, we can focus that magenetic field on an iron coil, and then use that field to induce current in another loop of wire.

      DC doesn't to that. The solution? Turn DC into AC. But how? By turning it on and off REALLY fast. You see all we need is a change in the current. A 555 timer, a Triac, a transform, a few resitors, and a bit of know how will do the trick.

      But I'll leave that for another discussion. Gotta get back to work...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    2. Re:What kind of power supply? by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be pushing power down a SATA connector if I were you...

  54. Performance? by HotshotXV · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the performance is going to be like with this development. I know that with other SFF (small form factor) boards, there is a performance drop, although the benchmark is getting closer and closer. With the new design here, what did VIA, and what will other manufacturers have to cut out in order to obtain such a small size?

  55. Infotainment Server by Gollum · · Score: 1
    Never mind the Nano-ITX board. How about the infotainment PC reference design below it! See here

    I WANT one!

  56. NES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been looking for a better board to stick in my old NES.

  57. Well KrisJ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I already have an idea..."
    • What's your idea? Inquiring geeks want to know.
    1. Re:Well KrisJ by borgdows · · Score: 1

      Inquiring Ashcroft too!!

      --
      John Ashcroft, Attorney General

  58. Nano-ITX... by mikewren420 · · Score: 1

    ...for when mini-itx is just too big.

  59. Guns and Linux RULE!!! by FreedomOfSpea-MMNnnf · · Score: 1
    ...wait.... what is so good about having a PC in an ammo canister?

    It's not like you can fire linux at people. And who would you want to fire an OS at anyway? SCO maybe?

    Guns are made for killing people (well MP5's anyway) or agressive deer... that's all.

    I suppose if you could get Linux installed on some heavy artillary you may be able to circumvent some prohibitive laws against ownership of said anti-aircraft gun.

    I'm pretty sure you aren't in the army though (which would be the other reasonable use of this weapon/MP5), or you'd be too shell shocked to type and keep your sense of humor (or probably sense of anything if you were in Iraq right now).

    --

    ~~I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank...~~

    1. Re:Guns and Linux RULE!!! by JonKatzIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      Actually, guns are made to accelerate a small chunk of metal to very high speeds and do so repeatedly as consistently as possible, thus ensuring accuracy. In some cases (such as the MP5) they are designed to eject spent casings and load new ones as well. Killing people and deer are only two of many possible interesting uses.

    2. Re:Guns and Linux RULE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ~~~~~~~~~"Killing people and deer are only two of many possible interesting uses."~~~~~~~~~~~

      Like yellin' "Yeee Hawwwww!" and firing them in the air!!! Or at anything else that a person with a MP5 might not understand and therefore want to destroy.

  60. Not Nano by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nano experts believe it's not a nano-sized board if at arm's length you can see it.

  61. Re:One of the benefits of propreitary technology by ddimas · · Score: 1

    True. That's the reason for patents in the first place, to give inventors incentive to publish their inventions. The alternative, as the inventors of patents were all too aware, is guilds and their secrets. And guilds STIFLE invention (to the point of actually having killed people).

  62. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, VIA's drowning.

    Sheesh

  63. What about power supply? by rvaniwaa · · Score: 1

    I really would like do use one of these but how does one power it? It would seem insane to hook a standard atx powersupply up to one of these mini pcs...

    --
    main(i){(10-putchar(((25208>>3*(i+=3))&7)+(i ?i-4?100:65:10)))?main(i-4):i;}
  64. PC-104 by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    If you want a small computer, check out the pc-104 computers. They are even smaller than this board and available with many stackable expansion cards. Go to www.pc104.org for more info.

  65. Computing Power per cubic cm??? by georgep77 · · Score: 1

    I've often wondered about the most space efficient way to manage computing power. I can only assume that 1u rackmount systems have the highest value of computing power per cm^3. Of course they are loud and hot, these nano-itx guys look to be fairly quiet/cool. I can just picture a borg-style cube of these tiny systems in my basement...

    1. Re:Computing Power per cubic cm??? by NeonSpirit · · Score: 1

      If you want server density the current crop of blade systems is hard to beat. The Compaq/HP BL10e class can get 20 servers in the same space as 3 1U boxes, and at significantly reduced cost and power consumption. You do loose external connections. No permenant USB or KVM and no serial at all.

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered.....my life is my own.
  66. Goddamn, what a bunch of idiots! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Just put a freakin' 15 pin header on the board, and the user can directly attach a serial cable. That's like half a square inch at most! For the cost of a UART, you make the board a thousand times more useful for psuedo-embedded tasks.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  67. Worst legacy PC item is still there. by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They haven't removed the worst offender of the old legacy PC, however. The BIOS is still there. PCs need to ditch BIOS and go with something decent like openboot. Also, console on an out of band management line needs to be stardand, so you can administer things remotely or when the network is down.

    It doesn't need to be legacy serial, though that's what everything else uses. Put it on USB for all I care. Just make sure I can get to the system outside the network, and boot/reset/configure it from there.

    1. Re:Worst legacy PC item is still there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A combination of a KVMoIP box and a managed power box (some UPS have this capability) that allows remote power on/off of individual electrical jacks both running on an OOBM network provide this functionality. Direct remote access to the BIOS is really an answer to a question noone asked.

    2. Re:Worst legacy PC item is still there. by CMonk · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd much prefer to ditch the monitor connector in favor of a serial port and true serial console support.

      This is just what I was looking for for an automotive project and I certainly won't be lugging a monitor out to my car. ;)

  68. Car radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would really like a car radio that could play ogg files off of cd, and to which I could upload music to wirelessly in the 250 to 300 price range. No

  69. Magic SysRq over Serial Console? by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1

    Have you found a way to activate the magic SysRq function from the serial console? If you have, does this method still work even if the machine is locked up solid?

    1. Re:Magic SysRq over Serial Console? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you found a way to activate the magic SysRq function from the serial console?

      Send a break.

      If you have, does this method still work even if the machine is locked up solid?

      Probably as well as the SYSRQ key would work - most of the time it works, but not always.

  70. Re:more info (actually much more) by gosand · · Score: 1
    Mini-itx was 17x17 centimeters, this is 12x12, so 5cm (or about 2 inches) smaller than a mini-itx.

    Maybe in length, but look at the total size:
    (17x17)-(12x12) = 145 = 12.04cm^2

    So they shaved off 12 cm squared, which is about a 50% reduction in size. Impressive.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  71. Re:more info - No PS2 keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats an s-video jack under the rca video jack not a PS/2 keyboard jack. So the keyboard will need to be USB as well.

  72. 12cm x 12cm is tiny by rgm3 · · Score: 1

    For those of you who don't really realize quite how small that is, I'll help put it in perspective.
    It's smaller than a standard CD jewel case. Amazing really.

    1. Re:12cm x 12cm is tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's small enough to fit up me arse!

  73. RJ45 Port! by swb · · Score: 1

    RJ-45 port like Cisco has been doing for years. It's practically perfect (other than you're losing RI, which has never been an issue for me). I've run Serial over Cat5 cabling for ~100 ft @ 19.2k with no issues, and higher speeds over ~20ft without a problem.

    It's not the standard that's the issue, it's the size of the connector.

    1. Re:RJ45 Port! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      No. Go RS-422 via DIN-8 connectors, effective, supported (SGI, Apple and NeXT all use RS-422) and RS-232 compatible. That way you don't have to worry about morons plugging the network cable into the serial port.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    2. Re:RJ45 Port! by swb · · Score: 1
      I don't have an issue with 232 vs 422, but RJ45s mean:
      • I have a ready supply of patch cables
      • A no-solder tool for making more (RJ crimper)
      • I can use my existing cat5 cable plant for distributing serial connections

      The risk of a moron doing a network/serial connection is there, but it should't damage anything. I've made the mistake myself, and nothing happened.
    3. Re:RJ45 Port! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      Not worried about smoke issues. I've had to talk a few secretaries & such through hooking up a 1600 series, and the port commonality is a PITA. That's why I suggest the other standard serial connector, rather than Cisco's non-standard connector.

      Using Cat-5 does make life easier though.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
  74. VMWARE. by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
    www.vmware.com

  75. Ask Slashdot: cases? by TClevenger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Interested in making a set-top box for the living room using a Mini-ITX board. I've done some searching, but most of the cases are rather, well, PCish. What's your favorite ITX enclosure? Looking for quiet (or no) fan, something not so PC-looking, external power supply fine.

    Thanks.

  76. The first rule of slashdot is that there is no /. by stienman · · Score: 1

    How to avoid a slashdotting:

    1. Refuse all connections where HTTP_REFERRER like "slashdot"

    -Adam

  77. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by zedmelon · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry; I didn't mean to confuse you.

    I don't pretend to know if VIA is doing well as a company or not; I personally don't give a rip either way.

    I merely observed that the article is loaded with propaganda like "Dawn of Digital Intelligence" and "Empowered Connectivity," and therefore reads like a bad pitch to the board of directors for an okay on a huge, underdeveloped product. These things sound to me just like the rest of the crap you hear 10,000 percent more than you heard five years ago, such as "synergy," "paradigm," and "financial viability." When someone spends more time/money on marketing a product than they've spent developing that product, they use phrases like these to dazzle and distract the customer and their superiors.

    I then stated that the ARTICLE contains far too many phrases from the Bullshit Bingo Handbook, which it does.

    Sheesh.

    --
    Mom says my .sig can beat up your .sig.
  78. If only there was Firewire (aka IEEE 1394) by ahg · · Score: 1
    When I saw the comment about mounting one of these into a 5.25" bay, I was reminded of yesterdays article about the 1.2 Terabyte "firewired" IDE drives... and I thought "Gee, pull one of the HDs and pop in a nano-PC and you have an inexpensive Terabyte network storage solution in one box or a gigantic MP3 server or {..fill in the blank... }"

    Then I learned these things had no firewire... maybe it will in a future revision

    --

    --Aaron Greenberg

  79. Fold the PCB by greendot · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for these boards to be folded or stacked. pull out board sections and stack them. I want a smaller 3D size, not so much 2D.

    If they managed to stack two or three layers that were the same size as a 2.5 inch drive, then that wold be awesome. Heck, even make the stack supports into heat sinks that can mount against the casing.

    So how is this Nano-ITX better than the PC-104 boards?

  80. Wrong font size by bluGill · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nice ascii art, but the font size is wrong leading me to get a wrong impression of the size. However it is easy to convert. There are by definition 2.54 cm to an inch, so the 12cm board = 4.72 inches - lets round that to the nearest quarter = 4.75. By definition there are 72 point to the inch, so you need to adjust your browser to a 342 point font. Note that I'm assume that your monitor properly scales fonts to actual size, odds are it does not (generally only macs try, and not all of them get it right), but that is implimentation specific.

    I rounded the inches measurement up a little because in most fonts [] does not take up all the pixels it could, and thus isn't exact size. I'm hoping this adjustment brings us to a better average. (likely width still a little small, hight a little big)

  81. 9" TFT Screens? by RangerSpeedBumpp · · Score: 1

    I've had a project in mind for a while that this board could be useful for. The problem is that it needs a 9" TFT screen but all the laptops these days seem to be 12" at smallest. Anyone know where I can find a 9" screen with the appropriate plugs to be used as a monitor for a very small computer?

    1. Re:9" TFT Screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since VIA's board always seem to have TV-out, might I suggest 9" LCD TVs? (yeah I know the resolution sucks, especially through a TV encoder and all - but if you could set your OS for a very low res, it might be good enough for what you need)

      All I know is that with a Sharp 6.4" LCD and regular RCA TV out from a M9000 I can *almost* read the characters clearly in text mode 80x25.

      With a 9" LCD I guess 640x480 could be somewhat "usable".

    2. Re:9" TFT Screens? by JVert · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I think the form factors are small enough now that we can start making our own webpads (even if the battery life is not that great) but there is no such thing as a cheap touchscreen. Which basically... sucks.

    3. Re:9" TFT Screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check eBay, they've got small LCDs al the time... problem is getting the right interface

  82. embeding by dedalus2000 · · Score: 1

    Ok, just wondering if I'm misunderstanding but I hear alot of talk about embeded applications for what is esentualy just a small form factor motherboard and I've also read some prety polerised debates over what constitutes an embeded application in regards to the mini-itx projects posted. What I realy want to know is at what point or what scale does a general computeing device start to be considered an embeded device for instance the seemingly endless posts of mini-itx amo canister pc's touted as embeded are universaly and I think rightfully discredited but if somone builds a vest housing processor, batery and some form of IO device such as a display and a small keyboard it's generaly agreed that it is a embeded or at least a wareable device. where is the line drawn?

    --
    My keyboads not woking popely.
    1. Re:embeding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually you can call something embedded when it has a processor controlling it, but it doesn't act like a computer. It should be transparent to the user. It should be "turn-key" and be ready to operate right now, not in 20 seconds. Preferably it will be small where smallness counts. Putting this board in a coffee can or ammo-case (as fun as that sounds) doesn't make it embedded if you're still going to be using it as your general computer.

      If you put this board in a case to handle a small phone network or control lighting/heating/security for your house (not like you'd need that much processing power) you might be able to call it embedded.

      A "purist" might say that PC this small will simply not be an embedded device, but don't ask me why. Maybe you have to get your hands dirty with 4 or 8 bit assembly and design your own boards before you can call it embedded. Maybe you shouldn't actually be able to use it as a normal PC.

  83. What I want is a processor+memory+fw interface by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    Imagine this. The board has only a processor, memory and a firewire interface, and a small rom to get things started.

    This board, can fit inside a drive bay, and be used as a second processor on your network. Compiling with +j2 makes sense. As a matter of fact, any processes that doesn't do a lot of I/O but is cpu intensive can be off loaded onto this secondary processor.

    Cheap smp!?

  84. all righty then... by el_salvador · · Score: 0

    what's next, a gameboy?

  85. power consumption and... no serial port? by edwinolson · · Score: 1

    I run a robotics competition at MIT, and we currently use 3.5" (roughly 4"x6"). form factor PCs. (http://maslab.lcs.mit.edu). The robots do fully autonomous exploration using vision, so CPU power is a real issue.

    Our current boards are Geode-GX1 @ 300MHz. Read "Slow". But, they only consume about 0.7A @ 12V. Read "No 40 lb battery".

    I've previously evaluated some Eden boards, including C-800 and 667 boards. BUT! Their power is about 2.3A @ 12V. Combined with our motors, that brings our run time under 40 minutes. Ouch.

    Power consumption: what is the power consumption of these boards? It really needs to be 15 W or so to be practical for our application. But I bet it's more like 25 W. Can it at least be extremely underclocked?

    No serial port? Are they out of their minds? If they're targetting embedded systems (at all), omitting a serial port is completely insane. So many peripherals are controlled via serial: GPS, actuators, sensors, industrial equipment, probably cash registers... Hopefully there's at least header for it, if not a proper DB-9. Anyone know?

  86. The portables revolution... by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that what this kind of stuff is leading to is a lot of really clever things being done with portables. The AutoPC failed, for example, but unleash thousands of hackers who will try a thousand different ways of making it useful for themselves, and something useful will come out of it. Maybe even a business model.

    With something this small, I'd be tempted to wire together thermometers, maybe a cheapo sonograph (is there such a thing?), and whatever else I could fit into a small box and build My Very First Tricorder.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:The portables revolution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No *cheap* sonographs, but if you want small ...

  87. MAME by Boone^ · · Score: 1

    So can this little guy get a Linux install that autoboots for a MAME cabinet?

    1. Re:MAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there Linux-MAME distros? I'd like to ditch my MS-DOS setup (especially since the M9000 isn't SB-compatible) but I don't want to mess around with a Linux install (especially since I need the whole OS+MAME to fit under ~10MB)

    2. Re:MAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm... One could possibly take a smallish LCD screen (like from a car theatre setup) and some buttons from a PS2 controller or the like... and build a custom case that would house a battery, this board, and a single hard drive, have the VGA out for hooking up to a regular monitor and find a direct to LCD mini-pci board (or have one made) to connect to the screen. Include an analog joystick for the controller, which would easily double as a mouse, set the resolution to 640x480 in the windowing environment to make it visible on the small screen, and voila! you have a portable mame cabinet... get a USB joystick and a separate monitor and you can play your MAME games fullscreen... and you have the ethernet port for loading new ROMs...

      It would be a little biggish for a portable system, but imagine the trade-off in having the larger screen and not having to carry around any cartridges... and you could theoretically add some kind of either bluetooth or WLAN device and have multiplayer on games that could support it...

      The only disadvantage would be running a portable gaming system with a hard drive, but that could be overcome by using solid state storage...

    3. Re:MAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Micro-MAME is almost what you just described.

      http://www.yvan256.net/projects/micromame/

  88. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by b!arg · · Score: 1

    such as "synergy," "paradigm," and "financial viability."

    I heard a lot of "synergy" and "paradigm" five years ago, but I don't think the terms "financial viabilty" were bandied about. Unless of course you are speaking of a lack thereof. :)

    --

    Everybody dies frustrated and sad and that is beautiful
  89. Not so good! by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You might loose your computer down the back of the sofa!

    1. Re:Not so good! by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Good God, no! But whatever you do, don't loose it on the kids. Think of the children man!

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  90. Inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling it nano is just to ride on the nanotech bandwagon. I guess the inflation keeps growing strong in the hightech industri.

  91. On this system though? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Sure RS232 has stood the test of time. However do you need it on every system? This one in particular? I have a lot of ideas for a board this size, and none include a serial port. Come to think of it, I haven't used a RS-232 port at home in several years. At work I've used them more often, but there we had terminal servers attaching them to the network, or a dedicated machine (486 laptop with a bad battery) in the lab. Never used them on my desk.

    I know of applications that abuse a serial port such that a USB-2-RS232 adaport won't work. If that is your applliation don't buy this board.

    For most applications though, RS232 is obsolete and not used. Why spend even 50 cents to add it? I don't need it on my set top box. I don't need it on my MAME arcade box.

  92. Re:The first rule of slashdot is that there is no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yeah, it is sooo hard to copy the link to your toolbar and press Enter... this only gives the site more time, not a solution to the problem.

  93. Waiting for DVI-I by claud9999 · · Score: 1

    Dunno why they're still stuck in VGA-land...DVI-I would give me DVI-D for my projector and DVI-A for people still stuck in the age of VGA and have a plug only slightly larger than VGA. Dunno why VIA hasn't gotten on the DVI bandwagon yet...

    1. Re:Waiting for DVI-I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >"people still stuck in the age of VGA"

      Get real dude, even most of today's LCD screens only have a VGA connector.

      Only expensive LCD screens have DVI, and I'm quite sure VIA doesn't want to cut off money-struggling buyers (hence VGA, the established standard).

      In fact, with their all-in-one low-cost solutions, they ARE targeting low-budget buyers (that, and modders of course)

  94. grab a cd... by zloppy303 · · Score: 1

    grab a CD and imagine it being square, that's how small this board is...

    --
    Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
  95. Re:Ask Slashdot: cases? by upplepop · · Score: 1

    I am thinking about the Morex 36xx cases.

    Here's a review: http://www.bigbruin.com/html/morex_3688.htm

    Morex official site: http://www.morexintl.com

  96. still lots of dead space?? by lburdet · · Score: 1
    imho, there sitll seems to be an awful lot of dead space on the board!!

    further shrinkage around the corner??

  97. Show your cards by JVert · · Score: 1

    What are you really using 232 for?

    We use 232 for home automation and often need more then 2 ports. In this case its much easier to use USB converters.

    Do you really need to send boot messages through the kernel?

  98. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and stupid javascript popups, which don't work here, so I am not seeing the photos anyway.

    Stupid webdesigners should be shot. Oh, wait, no, just flogged....

  99. The BEST line from the article: by Asprin · · Score: 2, Funny


    The BEST line from the article:

    "Click on a picture to enlarge it - probably beyond life size..."

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  100. Small + Cheap == Cool by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    What I like about this is that one can be ashured that VIA doesn't try to reinvent the wheel and just builds in stuff that tried, true and cheap and focuses on pushing the size limits without trying to push current perfomance limits at the same time, maintaining a sane price.
    Enough people have noticed that 1 GHz works fine for 99,9% of the jobs and VIA offers them an appropriate deal.
    Wouldn't be suprised if this kind of stuff would turn out to be the next-gen standard workstation.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  101. homebrew laptop? not quite. by dutky · · Score: 1
    The form-factor is pretty good, but the power consumption and feature set aren't quite there: This thing is going to draw at least 20W (that's a bit more than the C3 CPU requires alone) and it's lacking any sort of battery charging/monitoring circuitry (I'd complain about the lack of LCD interface, but you can get the board with an LVDS port, which should be close enough). On top of that, it doesn't have any serial ports and only has USB host ports (so you can't connect it to your desktop, for file syncronization or such, without using ethernet). Also, if they were supposed to have done away with 'legacy' ports, what's that PS/2 keyboard/mouse connector doing there?

    For a moment there I was afraid that this would kill my own pet project, but after seeing what the power consumption is like, I am not worried.

    1. Re:homebrew laptop? not quite. by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

      "...what's that PS/2 keyboard/mouse connector doing there?"

      What looks like a PS/2 connector is wedged between a composite video connector (yellow) and the 15-pin VGA (blue) couldn't that be S-VHS instead?

      Tell your dogma to leave my catatonia alone!

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    2. Re:homebrew laptop? not quite. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > couldn't that be S-VHS instead?

      Nope, since S-VHS is a tape standard. You must be talking about a S-Video connector, in which case I would agree (yes, it IS a S-Video out connector).

      So there's no PS/2 connector on this little mobo, as the original post pointed out (I guess, I didn't RTFP).

    3. Re:homebrew laptop? not quite. by dutky · · Score: 1

      oops, my bad, that's an S-Video port.

  102. Oh, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I absolutely DESPISE "engineers" like you. And, I quoted it for a reason. You're the kind of person who believes no good electronics were made after 1975, everything else is just overkill. You probably still have a CP/M machine as your primary workstation because "I don't need all those bells and whistles like color and non-character graphics". You're not an engineer, you're a paranoid old fart who believes all progress is designed to put you out of a job. I've seen far to many of you old fucks in my rear-view mirror over the years, I can't wait until you all die away.

    Tell you what, just keep living in your shack sending out mail bombs to everyone who makes some form of modern technology, and leave the rest of us alone. I, for one, am glad to see RS-232 ports finally going away. I haven't used one in five years, and I hope they start migrating off of ALL mobos in the near future. That and that damn printer port. USB, baby! Live the future!

    Wow, that IS quite a rant in response to just one line. :)

  103. PC-104? by po8 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they've reinvented PC-104. Only bigger. Wish they'd stuck with the established standard.

    1. Re:PC-104? by Snarph · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except keep in mind that PC-104 boards are 60% larger than this one. Maybe they wanted the extra real-estate that this form provides?

    2. Re:PC-104? by Snarph · · Score: 1

      Doh! Of course I meant that the VIA board is 60% larger than PC-104.

  104. You insensitive clod! by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

    Forget drivebay: a better place would be to mount it in a car

    I don't have a car, you insesitive clod!

    No then... I've purged the obligatory Slashdot humor, and now I can tell you that indeed is a great idea!

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  105. Bad pics by Nimloth · · Score: 1

    Anybody else think mini-itx should give Stuart (pic provider) a new digital camera as a thank you gift? Man those are lame...

  106. Re:ally Wonderful! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

    Hey, at that size it could be stuffed into some PDA cases. My newton was bigger than that.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  107. nano-itx.com was registered in March... by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    While it might be coincidence, it's a sign that Ewan knew it was coming. Hopefully it won't be too long until we actually see the boards coming out. Something with only half the surface area of even mini-ITX is gonna be fun.

  108. Re:Ask Slashdot: cases? by LookSharp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this for PVR and/or DivX/XviD playback?

    If so, I recommend an Asus Pundit small form-factor system. Mine has a nice TV tuner ($50), and a Celeron 2.0GHz which ran me all of $67. It has a very nice case, runs quiet, sits well with your entertainment center, and is about three times the CPU power of the C3 1GHz. The way I look at it, this barebones plus a $70 processor is still less expensive than a $100 Mini-ITX case with a $179 1GHz EPIA board. The form factor on the Asus is proprietary, but exceptionally flexible, functional, and not much larger than mini-ITX. I've been very happy with mine!

  109. Motorcycle to LAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may allow me to fufull my dream of taking my motorcycle to a LAN party! This, with a decent LCD is certainly small enough to fit in a backpack. Kewl.

  110. Warlunching! by jrrl · · Score: 1

    Finally, a motherboard that I can fit in a lunch box. Add in a micro drive, a mini-pci wireless card, and a usb gps and I'll finally have the warlunching rig I've always wanted. Heck, I'll even have room left over for a sandwich (which will no doubt be kept toasty warm).

    --
    Self Serving Sig: Hosting Comparison
  111. Re:Ask Slashdot: cases? by Suidae · · Score: 1

    Sheet metal, sheers and pop-rivets with a nice powder coat finish. You get exactly what you want in exactly the color you want.

  112. Tiny MB With Multiple Ethernet Ports? by nuxx · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a similar sized board with multiple ethernet ports? It'd be rather nice to have an all-in-one tiny router/firewall. Something with perhaps four eithernet ports and maybe a way to add 802.11b/g? Google has turned up nothing thus far...

    1. Re:Tiny MB With Multiple Ethernet Ports? by The+Other+White+Meat · · Score: 2, Informative

      This board has two USB 2.0 connectors.

      Buy a LinkSys/D-Link/etc. USB ethernet adapter, and you are set to go. They are supported in Windows AND Linux.

      --

      --- Generation X: The first generation to have SIG lines inferior to their parents... ---
    2. Re:Tiny MB With Multiple Ethernet Ports? by RedDirt · · Score: 2, Informative

      This company makes several models targetted at routers/firewalls: Soekris Engineering

      --
      James
    3. Re:Tiny MB With Multiple Ethernet Ports? by CyberKnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Via does. It's the EPIA-CL. When the mini-itx link comes back online, scroll down the page and you'll find it.

      --
      Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor - Ovidius
  113. Re:Photos? Don't bother. by sootman · · Score: 1

    The hell you say! That page has been loading for 2 minutes and I don't see *any* pictures. Liar! :-)

    Time to skim the rest of the thread and see if anyone's mirroring them. Just need to skip over all the jokes about "guess they're running the site off one, haw haw."

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  114. where's the dvi port? by pangloss · · Score: 1

    no legacy ports? why doesn't via at least use a dvi-i port? those that need vga can then use an adaptor. the rest of us can use dvi-d.

  115. floppies? by poptones · · Score: 1
    My PC doesn't have a floppy drive. I actually took it out of the case to make room for another HD. Several other machines here have floppies, but for some time now I have not been able to find a floppy that was actually able to store data in a way that was acceptable to windows or linux. Even when floppies were the only practical way to sneakernet stuff they still didn't work worth a shit.

    Good riddance. The sooner we all can carry around a gig or two of personal data on secure wireless pen drives, the better.

    1. Re:floppies? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 1
      Geeze, I still have a 5 1/4" drive, to play one game with copy protection that requires the original disk. It's also gotta be drive A:! Yeah, I know -- but it's a fun game and I have not found a "crack" that works. Not to mention all the data I have on diskette that I'm too busy to copy onto CDs.

      Hell, I still have a couple of 8" floppy drives; I don't use them, but I can't bear getting rid of them. Maybe someday I'll build a funky PC with one each of every size disk... the only things holding me back are time and money.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  116. Now if only... by Zemrec · · Score: 1

    Now if only they made a board like this with the fastest Athlon and video chip available, good 5.1 sound chip, then you could build a kick-ass gaming PC thats the same size as a Game Cube. :-)

    Then again, you'd need a monster heatsink and fan.

  117. GameCube LCD by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    If the TV out puts out whatever the VGA puts out right from power on then it's $130 or less for a GameCube LCD which will get you 640x480 in a nice little package and you won't have to worry about a monitor.

    You could probably use a standard 3.5" drive for storage but a laptop drive would probably be better and just mount it over the MB.

    And you also have to worry about a PSU but you could probably put together an external one like a laptop.

    If it were possible to get a complete package down small enough to just throw in a backpack, I'd start working on putting one together. Too bad we have to wait 5-6 months to start playing with them.

    Ben

  118. NOT Legacy-Free! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What are those two long blue ports with pins? We know one of them is IDE, I suspect the other is floppy. To be really legacy-free we'd ditch them and rely solely on the S-ATA. My 2 fennigs.

  119. Re:Ask Slashdot: cases? by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

    Try a Hush PC. About as small as you can get, no internal fans. (So the only moving parts are the HD and the optical drive. I suggest getting quiet ones.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
  120. sure its good and all but how much? by cyrax777 · · Score: 1

    really how much? it also needs to be cost efficant.

  121. dude, imagine hot-swap servers by donkiemaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    where you have a beowulf or other cluster and you just jam a bunch of these babies into a big raid array like box and then when one breaks you just pull it out and replace it with another and you don't miss a beat! hey you geniuses, someone get on this.

  122. The floppy? by lowmagnet · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they dropped it because they realised that floppys are FAR more expensive per meg than CD-Rs and DVD-Rs? Just a thought.

    As for the RS232 port, I'm kinda mixed. On the one hand you don't get that serial boot output. On the other hand, it's easier to hook up a monitor and a keyboard than term into an RS232 port.

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  123. Woohoo! by Generic+Guy · · Score: 1

    Nano-ITX the smallest yet. Now I can put a fully functional computer into a slice of bread, or an old shoe! Think of all the possibilities!

    --
    { - Generic Guy - }
  124. Hidden Spy Node by cpopin · · Score: 1

    You could install one in anyone's computer at work and listen to their network. Kind of like installing Linux on an XBox and sitting it on your desk.

    --
    -=- Many seek good nights and lose good days.
    1. Re:Hidden Spy Node by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Better yet you could build this into the shower buddy (those things women use to hold their shampoo and stuff in the shower) along with a pinpoint camera and a WiFi connection. Especially if they later release a version with some of their less speedy (and hungry) CPU's it should be able to run on a small battery for the length of several showers. Give it the ability to play mp3's and the women you gave them to might even keep the batteries replaced for you. Woot!

      Of course you could save money by using just a normal camera and tranceiver but that's less cool. ;)

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  125. what about a equally small power supply by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

    Any one know where you can find a tiny (roughly 12x12x12cm) power supply, kinda sucks when the powersupply takes up most of the room in a project.

  126. RF Thingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately using a a Usb to serial dongle makes too much RF interferance to use in a medical environnement, so no luck for you via, well stick to the intel atx boards for our next Pyxis Patient Stations

    1. Re:RF Thingy by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      What about the Mini-ITX boards? They didn't cut off the RS-232 connector on those!

  127. ip KVM's not a substitute for good serial console by Brian+Ristuccia · · Score: 1
    Try these guys for remote KVM

    Sure, IP based KVM's are neato. But then you also need remote controlled power outlets to power-cycle machines which are stuck in ways that can't be fixed without a poke on the hardware reset or NMI button. Compared to what you'd need for systems with proper serial console support including the ability to ressurect hung systems, this IP based KVM stuff is very expensive.

  128. correction by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Funny

    SPDIF can be transmitted optically over Toslink fiber optic cable or electrically over RCA coaxial cable. Real professionals prefer AES/EBU transmitted over balanced XLR cables.

  129. Hate serial, love Ethernet by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    I appreciate the ability to administer a server over the serial port. But it sure is a pain in the ass to set up. You have to run a dedicated cable from every server box to a dedicated terminal server, and then if you want to actually access that server from anywhere besides the server room you end up hooking up that terminal server to your network. Why can't computer manufacturers come up with a system to allow console administration of a server directly over Ethernet? Most MBs have Ethernet built-in now, and every server already has this cable connected. Why must we continue to run a separate, slow network for remote administration?

  130. I have your console solution: by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

    Check out these Digi Console Servers and also these Cyclades console servers

    We use them where I work (Computer Systems Lab at the University of Wisconsin CS department) and it is very easy to set up. 95% of the motherboards in all of our sun/red hat boxes have a RS232 connection, and we use a serial-RJ45 convertor (about 2 inches long, connects to the serial port) to connect the ethernet cable from the digi/cyclades console server to the machine.

    The computers all connect to one of the digi/cyclades console servers, which in turn are connected to a few computers which handle which computers are on which ports of the digi/cyclades box. So, to console over to a selected server, simply type "console p23" or whatever in a shell. Can't get any simpler than that. Running the wires is simple because you're already running ethernet, and you keep a digi/cyclades "hub" in each rack. Very little extra wiring.

    We live by these things. Very useful if sshd dies or whatever. And, you can send breaks to Sun machines!

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
    1. Re:I have your console solution: by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      I suppose I should mention that it's not always that easy. We have a fair amount of homebrew software, and one of the programs is the console app we made which checks the postgres servers and automatically connects you to the port. I suppose otherwise you need to connect to whichever digi/cyclades box and then from there connect to whichever port the computer you want is on. So, it's not that simple by default, but the software to do it is not all that hard to write.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
  131. Re:Don't fret! It may still have one! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    Actually, it may still have one! Serial only requires 3 lines for most cases, and VIA probably just moved the ports to pin headers rather than wasting board real estate with gigantic DB9 plugs. Via has Serial lines on almost [pretty sure] all of the ITX boards. They even have one [CL series] spec'd out with 4 serials [2 internal], 2 nics, and 6 USBs....I don't think they'd forget all the serial fans. Especially for such a small board that begs to control PLCs, Robots, or home automation type apps!

  132. Re:They do that with Macs! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

    They have PCI cards for Macs! But not for PC's? Actually most SBC industrial computers use an ISA/PCI backplane that "could" do that, but at $500+ for P3s I'm not rushing out to give it a try now am I!

  133. Re: move along...nothing to see here! by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
    Keep moving...There ain't no performance here. Sorry dude!

    Like posters above said, you get about Celeron 600 numbers out of these guys. But the video chipset helps out extra with hardware acceleration for video..basicly the same as any other Via on-board video.

    This is meant to be SMALL above all else. There's nobody else that makes a CHEAP embeded PC, espically when this should be in the $100-$200 range at most. SBCs start at $500+!

  134. what about firewalls and embedded security devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    smaller non "server" devices could benefit greatly from the these boards. In a perfect world, I could simply use whatever serial output necessary and let hardware do the conversion as needed. This new serial protocol wouldn't happen to be related to the two new PCI replacements would it?

    All I care about is the ability to plugin to the router or embedded device and view console messages but without adding an older (and additional) port.

    My crazy idea is use a Mini-PCI card not as the actual port but merely as a hardware addin for converting and redirecting serial calls to the USB port (and all that wonderful magic behind the scenes). This could even "push" the conversion to outside the box by providing a sort of stub or wrapper set of interfaces for various serial communications ports.

    After all, on a train they generally don't check your ticket until you are underway... this saves time and allows the overworked ticket checker to throw the occasional freeloader off the train at high velocities. Don't mind me... I just have had no sleep...

  135. micro, nano? by POds · · Score: 1

    Why cant we give the real size of the board instead of some type of marketing jargon. Why not give boards, sizes much like cloths has sizes.

    We dont go round calling a babies T-shits micro-shirts or nano-shirts.

    What happens when someone actualy invents an actual nano-itx board. Their not going to be able to name it. And i feel sorry for that person.

    I guess these boards have other characteristics like power consumption, but that could easily be overcome with a sub parameter.

    so maybe a mini-tix board could be called:

    8:40

    8 meaning the size of the board and 40 being some type of power consumption rating.

    We shouldnt use the english language like a whore. Tap into the vast realm of numbers. If we do, the english langauge will be around to be used on many many devices for many years to come.

    The english language: Limited Resource. Stop the mining.

    This is my pathetic attempt to make someone laugh.

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
  136. Oh yes? by haraldm · · Score: 1

    Any BIOS with a USB console, yet? Start thinking first, folks.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  137. external HDD case with software RAID? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    "...this 12cm by 12cm board can support 5 IDE devices, 4 off of the PATA connectors, and 1 of the SATA connector."

    Here's an idea: external HDD with software RAID?

  138. Parallel ATA? by Snover · · Score: 1

    So they got rid of all the legacy stuff...but still they have PATA instead of SATA...why?!

    --

    [insert witty comment here]