Slashdot Mirror


Major Problems with Cingular Network

Wabin writes "It looks like the Cingular GSM network is having serious trouble. My phone stopped working today completely, though my wife's was still able to make outgoing calls. Talking to tech support, they claimed some kind of massive failure across the country starting around 4PM yesterday and possibly a virus attack. Howard Forums is all abuzz, but there really doesn't seem to be any hard info. Glad I haven't totally given up the land line yet... redundancy is good."

382 comments

  1. rolled over by maddu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Congular rolled over !

    1. Re:rolled over by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Congular rolled over !

      They also now provide service in central africa.

      You know, cause of the new name.

      Okay I'll just be going now.

  2. Ack! by halo1982 · · Score: 2, Funny

    First power networks, now cell phone networks...PATCH YOUR WINDOWS!

    1. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how using my plastic sheeting and duct tape will improve cell phone reception. I also fail to see how it will protect me from smallpox, but at least in that case it gives me something to do while I'm crapping my pants and waiting to die.

    2. Re:Ack! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      First power networks, now cell phone networks...PATCH YOUR WINDOWS!

      Unfortunately, this won't happen while these namby-pamby virus attacks continue to merely disrupt things. Virus writers need to start making their viruses destroy the computers they infect after spreading. Maybe consumers or Microsoft will actually start doing something if their computers get destroyed every damned week.

    3. Re:Ack! by berzerke · · Score: 1

      ...Maybe consumers or Microsoft will actually start doing something if their computers get destroyed every damned week.

      Yeah, but probably the wrong things. Think about how "security" increased after 9/11 in the US. Lots of new hassles, civil rights trashed, privacy eroded even more, but very little true security. I dread the day virus writers get really destructive. I'm sure M$ would use such an attack to come up with even more "not interoperable" techniques. But now they can do it openly in the name of security. Security info would be censored even more than now, researchers jailed, etc.

    4. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meanwhile, some of us in free countries find your hypocitical politics amusing.

    5. Re:Ack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That was funny. To bad that you wasted your turn using your country's only computer to post it.

    6. Re:Ack! by Nykon · · Score: 1

      I still remember the days that virii would actually do damage. When you had to format your MBR to even begin to try to fix your system and reinstall your OS. Man I feel old,lol

      --
      "It's better to be a pirate then join the Navy"
  3. Can you hear me now? by egg+troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nope. Guess not :(

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Appearently you're confusing a broken cingular with a theoretically functional Verizon. I can see how you made such an error; I certainly couldn't tell the difference in performance.

    2. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have some good news, though.

      I just saved a load of money on my car insurance by switching to GEICO.

    3. Re:Can you hear me now? by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      That's Verizon Wireless... watch more television. (I do realize the allusion, but still)

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    4. Re:Can you hear me now? by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Hello!
      Hello!
      Are you there?
      Hello!
      I called you up
      to say hello.
      I said hello.
      Can you hear me, Joe?

      Oh, no.
      I can not hear your call.
      I can not hear your call at all.
      This is not good
      and I know why.
      A mouse has cut the wire.
      Good-by![sic]

      - Geisel, Theodor S., 1960, pp. 24-25, "One fish two fish red fish blue fish"

    5. Re:Can you hear me now? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You couldn't? I've never encountered a Cingular phone with acceptable service. My T720c on Verizon works flawlessly in San Francisco, north of SF, all over New England, and 18 miles out in the Atlantic.

      Maybe there's something wrong with your phone on VZW? Or maybe you're in some rural locality I haven't been to.

    6. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohio State might just be overrated, though. They've just been squeaking by in a lot of their games. The only reason they'll move up to 3rd in both major polls is because USC got stunned. I think the best thing for OSU is for Clarett to shut up and go away. I think they need to get that situation over with. And they might just not be that good this year, either. This is coming from a guy who wanted them to win it all last year. I think it'll be Oklahoma and Miami playing for the national championship, and Ohio State will pick up.. maybe.. two losses on the season. Just my two cents. :)

    7. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bring it on up to Seattle. Watch my phone get service in dark holes, caves, parking garages. We'll take your verizon phone out in the sun, and watch you try to talk to people over a one way connection on a supposedly two way device while your own TDMA echo is shouting, "Speak up, dude! My phone is ass!" back at you (due to either poor engineering choices by verizon, or advance waves previously reflected of the edge of the universe, the smart money being on the former.)

    8. Re:Can you hear me now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ummm.... Verizon is CDMA...

      Who's your wonderous provider anyway?

      And besides, come to NY (the state not the city)and see Sprint/AT&T/Cingular/Voicestream all suck "ass" and Verizon, Cell 1, and Nextel work to an acceptable degree.

    9. Re:Can you hear me now? by bscabl · · Score: 1

      >And besides, come to NY (the state not the city)

      i live in upstate NY.. my sprint phone works flawlessly, always has.. some people fail to understand tho, that the phone does have a small degree of control of what kind of service you get.. some phones simply suck..
      i have a sanyo 4900.... well known as the best phone made [right now] for battery life and signal stregnth [stock battery, not extended life]
      i use my phone without interuption in ny, vermont, mass all the time... the only place my phone seems to hate..is the latham ny taco bell.. it doesnt even roam in there for some reaon...

    10. Re:Can you hear me now? by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      I can agree with this. Upstate NY here also, and out in the middle of nowhere I'm usually 1-3 bars above any other phone around me (Sanyo 8100).

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    11. Re:Can you hear me now? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Sanyo 4900 Prices
      Discontinued model. Please shop for accessories or other phones below.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    12. Re:Can you hear me now? by bscabl · · Score: 1

      yea, just went clearance at my store recently :(
      ill miss it...
      prolly so they can replace it with a PTT model.

  4. DID YOU EVEN READ THE POST PRIOR TO YOURS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you just blindly post?! Sheesh. The first was bad enough. Now how many of these "Can you hear me now?" posts am I going to have to suffer thru?

    1. Re:DID YOU EVEN READ THE POST PRIOR TO YOURS? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 0

      DID YOU EVEN READ THE POST PRIOR TO YOURS?. Or did you just blindly post?! Sheesh.

      I hit reply to the story as soon as I saw it. As you know there's a significant delay between the time someone submits a comment and when it makes it to the static page, so no, I didn't read the previous comment.

      Do you understand now? Good!

  5. Well, I must say... by cliffy2000 · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's a shock... I mean, the fact that the quality's bad. Really, a company that spends a great deal of money on advertising producing a poor product?

    1. Re:Well, I must say... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      Shut up, I use Cingular, never lost use of my cell phone at all in the last two days. Their service is great, and I have over 3000 anytime minutes rolled over.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    2. Re:Well, I must say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cingular sucks in Kentucky!
      I have had thier service for 7 years now and it seems only to get worse with each "upgrade" to the system. I think they need to spend less $ on advertizing and get thier damn system working properly!
      Service your current customers first!

    3. Re:Well, I must say... by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cingular has been fine in Californa for the last two days. I've probably made 30 calles, and sent 20 messages. No problems.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    4. Re:Well, I must say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I posted this a few times, it was the HLR for Chicago that lost its database. Posting ANON, cause I want to keep my job...

      BTW, its not a GSM problem, its a bad network design problem, when you loose an HLR and have no backup.

    5. Re:Well, I must say... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 1

      yeah, especially since even in the best of times at least 50% of the time I wasn't able to make calls with them (CONSTANT "System busy" errors). Thank God I was able to convince SBC's (Cingular wouldn't even talk to me) corporate offices to let me out of my contract...

    6. Re:Well, I must say... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Their service is great, and I have over 3000 anytime minutes rolled over.

      But for many people, the whole network rolled over. Great. And how much do you (and all these other people) pay for the great service?

    7. Re:Well, I must say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After I don't know maybe 6 or so years of getting screwed over you might possibly think about trying another service. Just a suggestion.

      -AX

    8. Re:Well, I must say... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      $35 USD/ Mo. This provides 500 anytime minutes that roll over and 3000 night and weekend minutes.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    9. Re:Well, I must say... by shokk · · Score: 0

      How does that compare to TMobile's US$39.99/mo for 600 minutes plus unlimited nights and weekends AND A NETWORK THAT STILL OPERATES?!?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    10. Re:Well, I must say... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      They don't have rollover nor a network as large!!

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    11. Re:Well, I must say... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      it also provides me with tons of quality tv paid for by cingular's (these used to be yours) advertising dollars

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    12. Re:Well, I must say... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      I see just as many T-Mobile commercials...
      TROLL WAR!

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    13. Re:Well, I must say... by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 1

      Not too bad... but then, with Sprint I'm paying $35 (after all taxes and fees and etc.) for 300 anytime, unlim. night/weekend (after 8pm), unlim. PCS to PCS, and unlim. vision service (their high-speed data stuff). Any time reps from other companies have tried to persuade me to switch to the dark side, I told them about the plan I have. The answer: "umm.. nope. there's no way we could come close to matching that for you, I'm afraid." True, the minutes don't rollover, but on the flip side the network doesn't either.

    14. Re:Well, I must say... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      I still haven't seen the network flip over ever, but this is the only network here that has digital almost anywhere without roaming.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
    15. Re:Well, I must say... by shokk · · Score: 1

      When the network is down there is no "large network". With 600 minutes most don't need rollover...others can get larger plans. I don't consider lack of rollover to be a showstopper.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  6. More second hand accounts... by Exitthree · · Score: 1

    I heard several people today complaining that their phones weren't working, and I can only assume that they, too, were using Cingular. None of them had any idea what was wrong, either.

  7. cingular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps "Cingular" refers to their redundancy plan?

    1. Re:cingular by DWormed · · Score: 1

      No, just the number of routers.

    2. Re:cingular by Wakkow · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they posted a bit torrent link, this never would have been a problem.

  8. Service completely out... by danielsfca2 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Which is just a tiny bit different than the typical quality of service at Cingular. I would never do business with them. Judging by the way it sounds when I talk to my girlfriend on her Cingular phone, I can just imagine an emergency call:

    Help, Pol...............has a gu............ill us all ........... address is 3 ..........Street....

    1. Re:Service completely out... by SpaceManNH · · Score: 1

      HAHA! I love the example you gave. Help, Pol.... +5

    2. Re:Service completely out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, when Your service provider is down, take out the SIM card and make the emergency call. Emergency calls are free so... if You don't have a SIM card in your phone, the next best channel from all available cell phone providers is used.
      That's how things work in Europe atleast.

    3. Re:Service completely out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, I couldn't believe this report because with Cingular's quality of service, how could you possibly tell the difference between a systemwide outage and business as usual?

      Approximately four seconds after number portability kicks in, I'm jumping ship to another provider. (The four second delay will give me time to say "muah-ha-ha-ha-ha".)

    4. Re:Service completely out... by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      yes, no static on the superior digital calls, at least you could make out words through the analog static.

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
  9. Works here... by LamerX · · Score: 1, Informative

    It seems to be working okay here in Olympia, WA and it was working today in Seattle when I was up there. But maybe it wasn't, maybe thats why I haven't been getting any phone calls... But I did get some this evening... Anyone with troubles in the Seattle Area?

    1. Re:Works here... by Wakkow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Go ahead and post your number here. We'll all test it for you...

      I'm sure a phone slashdotting will help their network out a lot. =)

    2. Re:Works here... by seamarfan · · Score: 1

      No, I'm just south of Seattle (Kent/Tukwila) and mine is working fine. As is that of at least one friend.

    3. Re:Works here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You where using another HLR/VLR, the HLR/VLR that took out the southeast didnt effect you.

    4. Re:Works here... by Solokron · · Score: 1

      Nope AT&T Wireless for sure. With their HQ up here, I vouch to support the home company. Well, and of course they have typically been on the top of the JD Power and Associates awards.

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    5. Re:Works here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was out Friday evening here in Portland, but I had no problems on Saturday.

  10. overdue? never. by eWarz · · Score: 1

    i thought my bill was just overdue, LOL.

    I've been having problems since yesterday.

    The REAL question should be will they credit us for the downtime?

  11. Re:Can you... by darco · · Score: 1, Funny

    Argh, sorry, must post to kill mod points that I assigned.. I didn't realize this was a redundant post.

    --
    — darco
  12. Have you considered using bongo drums... by The+Revolutionary · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...for added redundancy?

    1. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe Skinner can train pigeons to play them for triple redundency.

      KFG

    2. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by QuantumFTL · · Score: 2, Funny

      Have you considered using bongo drums for added redundancy?



      And if that doesn't work, the customers can always join the Ukrainian Cellphone Destruction Championship.

    3. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by devphaeton · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have you considered using bongo drums....

      Can you imagine the mindless din created by a beowulf cluster of bongo drums doing a DDoS attack?

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    4. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by devphaeton · · Score: 2, Funny

      .....in Soviet Russia, Frozen and Petrified by the Siberian winds....whilst you eek out 4.profit! by bongo-spamming the world with images of Natalie Pr0tman one byte at a time?

      Sorry it took so long for me to follow up. My bongo packets were echoing off the walls and causing massive dupes, so i had to move outside.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    5. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by cheesee · · Score: 1

      Do I sense a new cliche coming on?

      --
      Got Shadowrun? Awakened Worlds
    6. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

      oh, how I wish I had mod points...... I almost had a seizure that was so funny. And so topical too ^_^

      --
      Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
    7. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of beowulf cluster jokes?

    8. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      Yes. Every SCA event I go to with belly dancers and drummers. Both are usually incompetent, and won't stop. :/

    9. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Azathoth prefers to have his mindless din created by flutes.

    10. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by thynk · · Score: 1

      Yes. Every SCA event I go to with belly dancers and drummers. Both are usually incompetent, and won't stop

      Really? It's been many a year since I've played with the local SCA group, but I remember the dummers were top notch and images of the dancers still haunt my most pleasant day dreams to this day.

      Memories like that make me want to pull my garb out of mothballs and see when the next event is.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    11. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by syukton · · Score: 1

      anybody who has ever been the guardian of a small child sure can... they'll bang on anything. endlessly.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    12. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Dude, you forgot about the hot grits!

    13. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

      Maybe /. uses bongos to post stories?! That would explain all the dupes!

      And my girlfriend and I had the same problem on T-Mobile, my phone quit working and hers was fine. I was told to turn my phone off for 5 minutes at least once a week to prevent the problem. Don't think that really makes a difference except once it happens, so I don't do it. If the phone dies again, I'll ust shut it off for 5min and it will most likely work (it worked the first time, and they assured me it would work if it happened again).

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
    14. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      frat boys as well...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    15. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was told to turn my phone off for 5 minutes at least once a week to prevent the problem

      I get the same thing from AT&T, except they also insist that I take out the battery, flap my arms wildly, and make some hooting noises. Whatever. It seems to work.

    16. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean frat boys will bang young children endlessly? I'd say that's true from what I have seen.

    17. Re:Have you considered using bongo drums... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called slashdot

  13. refund? by tedshultz · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that by law when phone service goes down (land line) you can get a refund for those times. I assume cell is the same? Watch your bill and be sure to get that $3 back.

    1. Re:refund? by Daveman692 · · Score: 1

      More like $30 with some of the pricing these days.

  14. Too Slow /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    According to several on the linked forums page, it's already back up and running. According to Shatular customer service, it was a 'power event' that took out large chunks of the nation. "We don't need no stinkin' UPS's"

    1. Re:Too Slow /. by Chundra · · Score: 1

      Well, the 'power event' is still happening in St. Louis.

  15. Could it be, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 0

    Winders XP???

  16. Re:MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the first post of the joke. Mod this one up, mod everyone else who repeats it down.

  17. Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got this hot chick's phone number, and she told me she has nothing to do on Saturday night, and she is bored, and she was going to go try on all her bikini suits to see what fits her this year. I am supposed to call her and come over to her place, I don't even know where she lives.

    And the phone number she gave me is apparently on Cingular network.

    1. Re:Crap by Roryking · · Score: 1

      They always give me Cingular numbers. And the network is conveniently down at exactly the time I pick up the handset to dial. Perhaps I should start asking for her CB radio handle...

    2. Re:Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You mean you would date anyone with a dynamic IP address? I always ask the potential female partner for a IPv6 static IP, and if she doesn't have one, well, who wants to deal with sluts anyway.

    3. Re:Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY! That actually happened to me one time! The bikini's, not the fake phone number.

      Met some girl at the movies- she needed a ride home, we went to Denny's where I ditched my friend. Got to her house, and she tried on two bathing suits (looked good). Then she laid down on the couch, and asked me to give her a massage- that lasted about 2 minutes until she started blowing me.

      I ended up doing her for about two months. She didn't go to school, didn't have a job (lived with her parents). It took me a while to realize that she was just all about sex (that's good too). She probably had 3 or 4 guys that she was doing at this time.

      I broke up/stopped doing her, but then one of my friends started seeing her. He was a virgin, so he was thrilled- but he didn't have a car, and she always needed rides somewhere, so that didn't last. Then another friend started to hang out/do her - all three of us in about a 4 month timeframe.

      I lost touch with the second friend, only to meet up with him about 4 years later. We were hanging out, playing pool, and I started to ask him if he remembered that "slut we all fucked". My other buddies started staring at me, until finally the guy said "Hey man...that's my wife..."

      OOOOOWWWWWW...I can't believe he married some girl we all had sex with. Oh well- I doubt I'll ever be invited over for dinner.

      Finish the story off with one of her favorite quotes..."It's been swell, but the swelling's gone down"

      An Melissa, if you are out there reading this...thanks- it was good, and I had fun!

    4. Re:Crap by flamingnight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right.
      You're reading slashdot. That never happened.

  18. The end of the world is upon us... by Admiral1973 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Cubs win their division and make the playoffs, leading to cell phone outages in the US, power outages all over Italy, and more hurricanes are coming. Better get ready for the rapture!

    --
    Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:The end of the world is upon us... by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 5, Funny

      if i had mod points i don't know if i'd mod you insightful or funny...

      --
      Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
    2. Re:The end of the world is upon us... by dav1ross · · Score: 1

      aw shucks...I'd mod him as BOTH insightful and funny!

    3. Re:The end of the world is upon us... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our rapture overlords.

    4. Re:The end of the world is upon us... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I'd probably mod flamebait.....but then I AM a Sox fan.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  19. Last month by papasui · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Welchia took out my entire division wear I work ~about 1500 users. The firewalls were doing a good job of blocking the viruses until one of the upper management decided to take their laptop home and plug it into an open internet connection and get infected with it. After the returned to work it spread across the unpatched systems and caused so much network traffic that everything was down for days (some areas didn't have IT on sight to clean up the problems). Really makes you think just how vunerable you are to these.

    1. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry it's offtopic, but... This is EXACTLY why firewalls are virtually useless on corporate networks. I have gotten in so many arguments with so-called "security experts" that are convinced they don't need to bother with keeping internal machines up to date, because the magic of the firewall will protect them. Instead, they don't do much more than foul up legitimate traffic and lead management into a false sense of security.

    2. Re:Last month by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Sorry it's offtopic, but... This is EXACTLY why firewalls are virtually useless on corporate networks. I have gotten in so many arguments with so-called "security experts" that are convinced they don't need to bother with keeping internal machines up to date, because the magic of the firewall will protect them. Instead, they don't do much more than foul up legitimate traffic and lead management into a false sense of security.

      Brunnhilde had a firewall too, and got knocked up all the same.

      (Tell your security gurus to put that in their pipes and smoke it.)

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Last month by Penguinshit · · Score: 5, Interesting


      I actually cut a CEO's network cable in half (in front of him and his just-about-to-faint secretary) for doing something quite similar.

      I told him he could have his network connection back in 48 hours after he had thought about his sins.

      When he got back from his weekend business trip, I never again had network problems originating from his office.

      Believe it or not, the CEO kept my manager from firing me.

    4. Re:Last month by pspeed · · Score: 1

      Heh. The only way a firewall can come close to solving the problem is if you put one on every desktop.

      --
      Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
      Comparing? THEN use THAN.
    5. Re:Last month by anubi · · Score: 1
      I think you touched on one of the major problems we techie types are having maintaining the system... that the systems are extremely sophisticated and require a helluva lot of knowledge to maintain properly.

      Here you have some upper management type playing around with technologies far beyond his comprehension. Sure, he may be good at the political persuasions of running a business, but often it seems that "powerful" people ( in terms of salary and ranking status ) within a company often overestimate how much power they have. They seem to often think their position of power protects them from the disasters that affect us mere mortals. So they feel free to "lead" the company down the paths of insecure systems and unstable computing infrastructure. To add to this, people who are very technically aware of the risks the power-person is unnecessarily taking are often viewed as "not team players" and are dismissed from employment at the first available opportunity. Being I personally experienced this at a big company, I am pretty quick now to see the turnaround a company can do sometimes upon the hiring of just one executive - its not his salary that drives the company into the ground, its having to obey his leadership.

      I think we see this a helluva lot in the information services sector. There are a lot of people out there in the support side who are very uncomfortable working with proprietary technologies they do not understand thoroughly and resist them like the plague. Its kinda like the doctors who have a lot of respect for those viruses responsible for haemorragic fevers, as they do not know how to control them. Others not so intimately aware of the problem are apt to be far less concerned about hygeine.

      Its been my observation that many of the "leadership" types running in the high technology arena are really good at getting funding and lining up venture capitalists, but are often sorely lacking in technological "horse sense". They are apt to force implementation of way overcomplicated Rube-Goldbergian technologies for the sake of show. Image seems to become everything, and substance becomes something hidden in the back room. Like the fancy restaurant where everything looks so nice in the dining room but the kitchen is a real low-grade sweatshop.

      As one colleague was telling me upon my frustration of dealing with one of these manager types, he told me my timing was all wrong. The venture capitalist had just blown the management up with money. Just imagine blowing up a bunch of balloons and letting them loose in a room ... they bounce all over the place until they run out of propellant, then its back on the floor again. He told me to just wait a year for the guys to run out of propellant, then they will finally listen. Only trouble is that by that time, the company is so snared up with contracts and committments that trying to fix it is hopeless. Its like watching a guy wire a house with aluminum wire. You know once he gets it all in, its gonna be a helluva mess to fix. But today, he has the money, and he's gonna put in aluminum wire no matter what the techie guys say.

      I know this is kinda a rant, but these failures with a subsequent delay in knowing what the problem is causing the failure is an indication to me that the complexity of the system is becoming more than the capacity to understand it. And that is a scary proposition.

      Whether some dot-com or department store puts in stuff they do not understand and can not maintain does not scare me much, as I will gladly go to their going out of business sale for a few fire-sale priced items I may need, but what does scare me is if I see infrastructure critical to our society, such as banking, adopting these technologies.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    6. Re:Last month by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      "...kept my manager from firing me."

      That would be too easy. Keep your eyes open for a delivery of sharks with frikkin' lasers beams attached to their heads.

    7. Re:Last month by pimpinmonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      no offense, but that is the kind of geek behavior that scares people away from geeks, rather than accepting them. most "geek-phobia" comes from geeks being ultraelitist and scoff at regular users who just don't understand and know better. so i'm glad you made your point, had your fun, and kept your job, but maybe if you tried to reason things out in laymen's terms you'd better the world a little bit more.

      just my 2 cents though

    8. Re:Last month by FirstOne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "The firewalls were doing a good job of blocking the viruses until one of the upper management decided to take their laptop home and plug it into an open internet connection and get infected with it."

      These days I never go into a client site without my OWN firewall/NAT, which has it's own little 4 port switching hub. I use a Dlink DI-604, which cost me a whole $20 after rebate. The firewall/NAT lets me connect both my laptops and set up a "Whitelist" of client systems and internet sites I need to access. Thus one can avoid needless exposure of one's own systems to Client/Internet and vice a versa without some extra protection.

      A side benefit is that I don't have to change the network settings between Office and Client work sites. :-)

      Saves a lot of headaches about installing the client's latest XXX corporate anti-virus whatever. Note: Installing the client's site licensed AV Software would make me a pirate the moment my laptops left the job site. Never did use M$ security hole infested email programs. I also recently retired IE to backup browser status, it's no longer worth the patching nightmare. I now use Firebird as my default browser.

      All in all, a few extra steps.. but worth it..

    9. Re:Last month by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      who just don't understand and know better

      While that may be the case in a 'civilian' setting, I'd venture a guess that this was an oh-so-common case of the CEO thinking that the rules he signed for the rest of the company to follow, didn't apply to him. I mean he's the CEO after all.

      Virus infestation or Enron scandals abound as a result.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    10. Re:Last month by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to my network a couple of weeks ago. Firewall was blocking all the nasties but someone with an infected laptop plugged in...There were quite a few unpatched systems, but Norton stopped them from getting infected, so luckily there was practially no harm done, unless you count the calls from users saying Norton is giving them a warning that a virus has walked into their system.

      --
      -R
    11. Re:Last month by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Or, sometimes one is able to make a point a thousand times more effectively through one dramatic action than through a bunch of politically correct consensus building.

      As told, the action does sound a bit silly, but the story is short enough on details that it makes it just about impossible to really decide either way from the context. The only detail that might lead one to make a judgement is that the CEO decided that he liked the behaviour enough to keep the guy around.

      Believe it or not, some CEOs actually prefer not to surround themselves with yes-men. Such an action could easily turn out to be very good for the OP's career, if the CEO decides the guy is a no-nonsense, technically astute guy, he may even end up becoming the CEO's "second opinion" guy for computer/tech issues.

      My advice to the OP -- learn to play golf, you may need it soon. If the sharks with frickin laserguns don't get you first.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    12. Re:Last month by thynk · · Score: 1

      no offense, but that is the kind of geek behavior that scares people away from geeks, rather than accepting them. most "geek-phobia" comes from geeks being ultraelitist and scoff at regular users who just don't understand and know better.

      You say that like it's a bad thing. I think a healthy dose of fear of geeks can be exactly that - healthy. It keeps me from having to pull out the cattle prod and KY Jelly to get my point across.

      Keep up the good work GP!

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    13. Re:Last month by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Informative
      I've actually done similar things - even pulled off the apocryphal "put it back in the box, take it back to the shop, and tell them you're too fsckin' stupid to own a computer!" line once - but only as a last resort. It goes like this :
      1. Explanation
      2. Explanation with attached threat
      3. Carry out threat
      The trick is to choose your targets, and do it all with good grace and a sense of humour. If you've done it right, not only will you keep your job, but you'll probably be known as that guy who knows his stuff and can take firm and decisive action.

      (However, I suspect that this time next year I'll be having the following discussion in a pub somewhere :
      "I survived 3 rounds of layoffs!"
      "But weren't there 4 rounds?"
      "Yes...."


      Last week, our manager told us "there isn't a morale problem, there's a negativity problem, and if you're negative it's your fault!". Now, I'm no good at taking hints, but I think I see something that looks a bit like writing on that wall over there...)
      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    14. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you should mention this in a comment to a story about Cingular and singular points of failure.

      Did your strategy for avoiding Welchia consist solely of blocking ingress at firewalls?

      Does it still?

    15. Re:Last month by penguin7of9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actually cut a CEO's network cable in half (in front of him and his just-about-to-faint secretary) for doing something quite similar.

      If you can't deal with a CEO plugging his virus-infected laptop into your network, that only goes to show that your internal security and antivirus measures suck. Your network won't be secure and reliable unless you can prevent virus infections from spreading internally.

    16. Re:Last month by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      After the returned to work it spread across the unpatched systems and caused so much network traffic that everything was down for days (some areas didn't have IT on sight to clean up the problems). Really makes you think just how vunerable you are to these.

      Yes, and if you ponder that a little longer, you'll see that the way to deal with that is to make your systems robust against virus attacks from the inside, no matter whether the machines are up-to-date and no matter who plugs in where. With halfway modern networking hardware, that is not difficult to do.

    17. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you almost got fired for not doing your job(patching updating etc), the boss found out but was to stupid to know any better or even reason out that he only got infected because you hadnt done your job. Your immediate supervisor knew the real deal but was cowered into not firing you by his boss who was still reeling from the improvised theatrics.

      Great Job! Sounds like typical SysAdmin stuff to me!

    18. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you carry 2 laptops and a hub to remote sites? That's way geekier than me claiming I'm safe using an ibook.

    19. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penguin, you're my hero.

    20. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never did use M$ security hole infested email programs. I also recently retired IE to backup browser status, it's no longer worth the patching nightmare. I now use Firebird as my default browser.

      Hmm, but you don't use Linux. Outcast. The boys will be coming for your Geek Badge.

    21. Re:Last month by Xenophon+Fenderson, · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firewalls aren't useless. Traffic shaping and filtering is an important part of one's perimeter defenses. Unfortunately, there are two major flaws that firewall vendors want you to ignore:

      1. Much like a stoplight, firewalls must allow some traffic through them, i.e. they are traffic control mechanisms. One can still attack any system whose traffic is permitted to pass through the firewall.
      2. Firewalls, like all perimeter defenses, cannot mitigate the risk of insider attacks, as Slammer and MSBlaster illustrated.
      As with every threat (except for werewolves), there is no silver bullet, no magic countermeasure that by itself will mitigate every risk. One must deploy a variety of countermeasures against an even greater variety of threats and vulnerabilities, including traffic shaping and filtering (which could include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and hybrid firewall-IDS aka intrusion prevention systems), configuration management (including software patches and malicious mobile code detection), and so forth and so on. These countermeasures must be deployed at several levels to afford adequate protection, e.g. both in the network core and at the network edge. Anyone who tells you different is a fool, as you so correctly described the "security consultants" you dealt with.

      I only make these points to remind everyone of the concept of "defense in depth". There is no magic security solution that is all countermeasures to all threats.

      --
      I'm proud of my Northern Tibetian Heritage
    22. Re:Last month by Knightmare · · Score: 1

      Your so cute, you must work at a small company huh? While what you say sounds really GREAT, try implementing it at a company with over 100,000 nodes soon growing to 300000+.

    23. Re:Last month by Admiral+Llama · · Score: 1

      Or you could just use a Mac.

    24. Re:Last month by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Your so cute, you must work at a small company huh? While what you say sounds really GREAT, try implementing it at a company with over 100,000 nodes soon growing to 300000+.

      If you really think it can't be done on that scale, just get out of the business now: you make the rest of us look bad.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    25. Re:Last month by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      But he is right, nine out of ten virus problems we have on our company network are caused by laptops that were infected at home by executives. We have a very clear policy regarding updating the laptops with the latest virus scanner, etc...

      The other way viruses get in is idiot execs double clicking on attachments that make it through the firewall. I know you are all wondering why I'm singling out the execs? The worker drones don't usually have laptops, or answer personal email during working hours. The techs generally know better which leaves us with the execs. Now, most execs are cluefull (that is actually how they make their way up the old executive ladder), but hubris comes with the territory.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    26. Re:Last month by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You obviously don't work with large networks. He is right, in general everything inside is trusted, everything outside is not trusted. We have the same problem. Out wonderful security stoppps everything at the firewalls/scanners, but them some "forgetful" exec (who has forgotten every security policy) plugs his laptop in his office after getting infected at home. The troan emails everyone on his email list, and one of the recpients double clicks on the payload - after all why not, its from good old Bill the VP of xyz.

      But why aren't all your NT servers patched? Because the patches have along history of breaking all the apps, and the system owners won't let us until it is tested on the test box which means we are always behind a few patch levels. We have never had a any virus on any flavour of Unix, but we had a groups of tech running through the computer room yanking out lan cables on all the NT boxes one very memorable evening.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    27. Re:Last month by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      While what you say sounds really GREAT, try implementing it at a company with over 100,000 nodes soon growing to 300000+.

      Well-run corporate networks (and I we have one at work) don't have problems with this: you have internal firewalls, internal security scans, internal security audits, and decentralized management (i.e., someone feels responsible for every machine). Only network connections that are related to the purpose of a machine are actually permitted, and machines that misbehave are detected and can be isolated instantaneously.

      If anything, that sort of thing is easier to implement on a large network because the initial, fixed costs of setting it up are spread over more machines. Of course, the IT staff needs to have a clue, which, sadly, IT staffs at many companies don't.

      And the larger the network gets, the more important it is. With 300000+ machines, it's more likely that the tooth fairy exists than that all of them will remain virus-free.

    28. Re:Last month by kjs3 · · Score: 1
      Really makes you think just how vunerable you are to these.

      Actually...it really makes me wonder why in the world one would go unpatched these days. It's not like Welicha was the first warning that that's a pretty st00pid way to do business.

    29. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do have to ask. Do you have people taking 'unix' laptops home? Do not get so upity about 'unix' being secure. Its just as secure as every other OS out there.

      The current flava of the month is to write worms for NT type boxes. Someday it may be your unix box...

      Where I work they have started installing blackice on all laptops. This helps some. But I dont think its enough. Honeypots should also be put on your network. To notify you when something bad is happening. I treat a internal network only slightly more trusted than an external one. Because of that very reson, outside sometimes leaks in.

      Course tommorow I get to play the game of 'NO that patch breaks all our software we need to get microsoft to fix it.' 'But you must have all patches or we will unplug you'. Then I get to call microsoft. That should be fun...

    30. Re:Last month by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

      I actually cut a CEO's network cable in half (in front of him and his just-about-to-faint secretary) for doing something quite similar.

      Why not just replace it with a powerbook?

    31. Re:Last month by mikemsd · · Score: 1

      Don't you think that's a little harsh? I mean, the punishment needs to match the crime here.

    32. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you soldered it back together for him, using yellow heat shrink to emphasize the wound.

    33. Re:Last month by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      note even if you aren't using IE, it is still running and will happily run http calls in the background. Just not using it isn't 100% protection.

    34. Re:Last month by JWhitlock · · Score: 1
      If you can't deal with a CEO plugging his virus-infected laptop into your network, that only goes to show that your internal security and antivirus measures suck. Your network won't be secure and reliable unless you can prevent virus infections from spreading internally.

      Yes, everyone knows management should be on their own subnet, firewalled from the rest of the world, with similar but crippled servers (email doesn't allow executables or PowerPoint attachments, DNS blocks playboy.com et al, etc.).

      And shouldn't all laptops and wirelessly connected devices be on their own firewalled subnet? They really are a different beast to manage than a computer that you expect to be plugged into a wall 24/7.

  20. well by mwhahaha · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess it is time to go back to smoke signals...

    1. Re:well by devphaeton · · Score: 4, Funny

      I guess it is time to go back to smoke signals...

      Yeah, but we need to start an RFC for Secure Smoke Signal Protocols. This might require Particle Hopping and encrypted blankets.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    2. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three words for the ultimate smoke signal security: Quantum smoke dots.

    3. Re:well by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      How about Bongo Drums?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:well by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please no more smoke - it's interfering with the entangled photons on my quantum encrypted flashlight signals.

    5. Re:well by borius · · Score: 1

      Lucky bastard, you have smoke signals?? Over here we have to use IP over avian carriers (RFC 1149). Have you ever seen the pigeon dung fallout of a slashdotting?

  21. AT&T Network having similar problems... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed similar problems with the AT&T GSM network last week. And the week before. And for about six months, continuously, before that. I couldn't receive calls pretty much anywhere, and couldn't place calls anywhere. The problem stopped abruptly last week, but I believe it may have been coincedental to my signing up with Verizon, and swapping my Motorola GSM phone for an LG whatever-verizon-uses-that-isn't-GSM-phone.

    If you live in the US, avoid GSM like the plague. Especially in Southern California. I was effectively unreachable when I had GSM. Now that I'm back to traditional service, I can almost see dropping the land line.

    And of course, to make matters worse, my Motorola T720 would only try for so long to sign back on to the netowrk when it went out of range. After that it just stops, displays "Unregistered SIM", and is effecitvely shut off. So if you're out of range for 30 minutes, you're out of range all day!

    </rant>

    --
    What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    1. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by halo1982 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      YOU may have been having similar problems, but this is not the same thing. Half of Cingular's network is down. This started on Friday. This is one person having problems such as in your case, this is millions of people. And I think if it couldn't find service and shut off maybe power cycling your phone would help...

    2. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by rossifer · · Score: 1

      You just described my entire experience with AT&T after moving to SoCal. Also, I too was cursed with the hellishly awful T720 phone and now that I'm not longer a customer, I'm trying to come up with an appropriately vindictive way to demolish that shiny little instrument of frustration...

      Any good ideas?

      Regards,
      Ross

    3. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by BrookHarty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love how people blame phone companies for mobiles phone problems. Really, Motorola phone, try blaming motorola.

      I havnt seen any good benchmark sites for phones, but seems there would be a need when you can pick 20 types of phone for each carrier. Even nokia alone has 50+ phones that might work on a carrier, and each have different problems, battery life, attenna strength, etc.

    4. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by balbeir · · Score: 1

      Yeah, actually my ericsson t68i has exactly the same behavior here in san jose. GSM coverage with cingular is awfully thin (though better than sprint). I think the problem is with the SIMS locked to the network and lack of roaming agreements between the different GSM providers. Isn't the USA a great country :-)

    5. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

      YOU may have been having similar problems, but this is not the same thing. Half of Cingular's network is down. This started on Friday. This is one person having problems such as in your case, this is millions of people.

      You're the perfect example of why I rarely post on Slashdot anymore. It's just not fun anymore. Of course it is different! Hasn't anyone ever heard of sarcasm?

      And I think if it couldn't find service and shut off maybe power cycling your phone would help...

      You know, I figured that out too. About six months ago. The point is it's not fun to do that every four hours! Your tone and IQ suggest you might work for AT&T? Yes?

      --
      What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
    6. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by The+Ancients · · Score: 1

      Dust lightly with flour, open microwave door, then 4 minutes on high should do it...

    7. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      The phones are hardly an issue anymore on a _proper_ gsm network(of course, battery life matters and physical wear), all new phones do actually work. Oh yeah, i'm punching this on a mobile right now, but the point is that the network can be done properly.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by cygnus · · Score: 1
      no, this isn't an AT&T or Moto problem.... AT&T and Motorola have righgeously ganged up on you for living in Southern California. ugh!

      try moving to New York... the AT&T GSM here is fine. :)

      --
      Just raise the taxes on crack.
    9. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by rossifer · · Score: 1

      Both the service and the phone suck.

      The service sucks because the areas with coverage are so spotty and the signal penetration into structures is so poor. There is no GSM coverage within a mile of my apartment. On city streets anywhere in LA, I'm lucky if the network will be good enough to hold onto a call for more than a minute (and I don't call while driving, but the fact that I can't call while riding as a passenger is particularly annoying).

      The phone sucks because it's interface is unbelievably painful to use (one example of many: when trying to click to 'Smallberries, John' in the phone book by clicking '7' four times (P->Q->R->S) it stops for two seconds to tell me that there aren't any Q's), the rather bulky battery that comes with it barely lasts a day on standby, the fact that if it can't contact the network for 30 minutes it gives up permanently (and you'll never know it by looking at the external screen, you have to open the phone to see that status). The only good thing about that phone was the fact that it sounded great.

      As a note: I did also try various Nokia phones, but they didn't have any better luck at finding a signal than the Motorola phone so I took them back within the 30 day limit. But I ended up being stuck with the T720, so now I get to find a fun way to treat it right.

      Believe me, I despise both AT&T Wireless and the Motorola Mobile phone. But the only residue I have of that whole sordid experience is the phone, so I'll take my frustration out on that.

      Regards,
      Ross

    10. Re:AT&T Network having similar problems... by ChangeOnInstall · · Score: 1

      I'd highly recommend getting out of your contract and getting a non-GSM item. It's really shocking how neat of a device a cellular phone is that actually works. You CAN get out of your contract. A lot of people are under the impression that a cell-phone contract is some type of indentured servitude whereby you sign your life away to phone company X with no recourse for a few years. The customer support folks and salesmen will treat you like this is the case, but it isn't.

      It's just another contract. You're providing your money in exchange for their products and services. No service...no money. Ask any lawyer. Basically in your case AT&T has failed to fulfill their contract, and thus cannot expect you to continue meeting your end of the bargain. You obviously don't want to go to court over this as the early-term fee is $175 and that's probably not worth it for most people. But the fact of the matter is they KNOW that you will win on this and they'll do be nice voluntarily if you push them on this point.

      Just call them up, and tell them that you're T720 doesn't work, you don't get calls, can't make calls, etc. They will tell probably try and hook you up with a new phone. Politely explain where they can shove it. Ask them if they can bring your last bill up on their screen (they can) and have a copy of it handy. Show them all the one-minute phone calls you undoubtedly have recorded on the bill, and explain what that means (no service/crappy service).

      Just my humble recommendation. It will work if you want out of your contract (I just did this last week). You'll probably be on the phone for a half hour, but it's fulfilling in the end. And don't take that "how about we go in halves on the early-termination fee BS" that they will try!

      --
      What has *science* done?!? -- Dr. Weird (ATHF)
  22. Yup, same here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netcraft says they've just (today) changed their hosting from SBC to BellSouth, both on Solaris. That could just be the web server, though.

  23. I SAID MOD IT DOWN YOU TWATWAFFLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do it NOW before I shit on your pillow.

  24. Apparently this started in Atlanta by halo1982 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah...apparently the problem started in Atlanta. Something went out there, and it switched over to a backup in Chicago, and I guess it couldn't handle the extra traffic so there was a cascading failure? Wait a minute, this sounds familiar... This is only on Cingular's GSM, not their TDMA. Those with TDMA and GAIT phones are able to use the service normally. Also, it seems like its only around mid america to the east coast.

    1. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by sohojim · · Score: 2, Informative

      My phone is TDMA and GAIT and hasn't worked for 3 days.

    2. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by Ingenium13 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I have a good friend w/ a TDMA Cingular phone. Yesterday the service was flaky. I called him from my Sprint phone and I got a "unreachable" message from Cingular, not his voicemail. I tried a few more times and it went to his voicemail finally, but never actually to his phone. Today it was down all day. He couldn't make or receive calls. Another friend of mine has a GSM Cingular phone and she couldn't receive calls either. I'd get the same message. When I tried calling from a Verizon phone to both phones I got a fast busy signal instead. My friend said he could still receive the text messages I sent him though. At 11:30pm EDT he texted me saying his phone was working again, but I didn't receive the message on my sprint phone until midnight when he sent me another. I called him on his phone and it worked fine at midnight. So I guess whatever the problem was is resolved now.

    3. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cingulars HLR was down, the whole database had to be restored, the backup wasnt working. Restoring a database is time consuming, just think how long it would take Amazon to rebuild its database with each book.

      Real bad design, and with only 2 people running the HLR at cingular, you can see where this is going...

    4. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cingular phone here in Delaware has been working fine... TDMA of course.

    5. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Many of Cingulars "GSM Network" sites also speak TDMA for legacy compatibility with their older customers. It seems that a problem of this scale would be among the networking between the towers moreso than the tower sites themselves, so TDMA users talking to the "GSM Network" sites would also get hit.

    6. Re:Apparently this started in Atlanta by phylus · · Score: 1

      How does Cingular have separate GSM and TDMA networks? The GSM standard uses TDMA, not CDMA or AMPS or any of that other stuff.

  25. Cingular... by pspeed · · Score: 5, Funny

    [Wavy lines back to the management meeting long long ago.]

    Marketroid 1: We need to come up with a name for our company.

    Marketroid 2: Yeah, and it needs to be snazzy... catchy... possibly spelled wrong.

    Geek (sweating heavily): Big problem. We can't go live yet, our network has way too many singular points of failure. (A geek with poor grammar, who knew?)

    Marketroid 1: That's awesome! Singular it is!

    Marketroid 2: Or Cingular.

    Marketroid 1: Genious. There's a new BMW for both of us for this one...

    [wavy lines forward to present day.]

    --
    Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
    Comparing? THEN use THAN.
    1. Re:Cingular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one little nitpick, they aren't marketroid's, they are marketeers, like mouseketeers, but with funny little BMW's instead of funny little hats.

    2. Re:Cingular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. sorry, me again; one more little nitpick: genius has no o.

    3. Re:Cingular... by mamba-mamba · · Score: 1

      They misspell words so that they can trademark them. You can't get trademark protection for ordinary english words. But if you cleverly misspell them, then they are not ordinary english words.

      Starbucks claims trademark protection for the word "venti," which they use to specify the size of their drinks, even though "venti" just means twenty in Italian. (It's a twenty-ounce cup. This is ironic because in Italy they use milliliters and deciliters, not fluid ounces.)

      I'm not sure whether Starbucks also claims that "grande" is a trademark or not. Might be a tough claim to make.

      MM
      --

      --
      By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
    4. Re:Cingular... by pspeed · · Score: 1

      They misspell words so that they can trademark them. You can't get trademark protection for ordinary english words. But if you cleverly misspell them, then they are not ordinary english words.

      Yeah, I know. It is kind of funny though, when you think about it. Now that they have the registered trademark Cingular, another company (in a similar or related industry) couldn't name themselves Singular even if they didn't want to trademark the ordinary english word. It's too similar to Cingular.

      --
      Edu. sig-line: Choose rhymes with lose. Chose rhymes with goes. Loose rhymes with goose.
      Comparing? THEN use THAN.
    5. Re:Cingular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank you Grammar "fucktard" Nazi.

      i didn't begin my sentances with a capital letter.

      reason: because I'm not a capitalist, I'l like you; a communist.

    6. Re:Cingular... by WeirWolf · · Score: 1

      Actually, "cingular" is a real word. It comes from biology, where "cingulum" means "A girdlelike marking or structure, such as a band or ridge, on an animal." Thus, "cingular" means "encircling, girdling, surrounding".

      presumably, what they want their network to be :)

    7. Re:Cingular... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok run-on-sentence boy we *DO NOT CARE*...

    8. Re:Cingular... by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      They misspell words so that they can trademark them. You can't get trademark protection for ordinary english words.

      Um, Microsoft says that you can, and so therefore, you can. Microsoft is a corporation. This means that their valuable trademarks are more important than an individual's common words. (Windows, Word, Excel, Access)

      Apparently, you can even trademark suffixes such as *ix as in Mobilix / Obelix. (This will bite Unix, which would need to become either Eunechs or Unicks.)

      Don't preach that you are not supposed to be able to trademark common words or suffixes. We know this. It doesn't matter what is supposed to be, if that is not what our corporations want.

      There may still be time to get a patent on trademarking the prefixes of words.

      I believe that eventually "Intellectual Property" will get no respect at all. The IP owners are digging the hole. They put ad leaders on the movies telling us to "respect copyright". Yeah, right. As if the current form of copyright is worth respecting.

      But hey, people might obey crazy laws. (Prohibition, "unnatural" sexual practices, 55 MPH, "illegal in Boston to bathe without authorization of a physician", etc.)

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    9. Re:Cingular... by TheWingThing · · Score: 1

      Genious is a great misspelling too, genius. That would make a great company name too.

  26. MOD PARENT DOWN!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Author has a bad attitude and is in need of some of Slashdot-style discipline. Mods, do your work.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!! by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      Look, if you're going to be insulting, at least do so under your registered name. There's a reason it's called Anonymous Coward.

      I honestly couldn't see the post that was posted 10 seconds before mine... I'm still not sure why the mods think my post should be at -1.

  27. Stuff from Cingular tech support by taped2thedesk · · Score: 4, Informative
    I called customer service earlier today... the techs sounded pretty stressed out. They told me if I wasn't having problems, I would be fine as long as I didn't power cycle the phone. When the phone is powered on and tries to reregister itself with the network, it can't. Of course, my battery died before I could get to a charger.

    I'm still without a connection, and when people call my number, they don't even get my voicemail... just a fast busy signal.

    Damn you Cingular! I'm switching providers! Wait, I'm locked into a two year contract :-/ I knew that was a bad idea.

    1. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by michaelhood · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sure you could get out of that contract on the grounds that they didn't uphold their end. IANAL, but there are reasonable expectations on delivery of service in a contract.They are likely in breach of this, seeing as how their service is totally unreachable and unusable.

      People cannot even reach your voicemail. This would cost me more money per day than the penalty for axing my Sprint contract, anyways.

      Call them. End your contract. Get a better provider.
      (FYI: Sprint is NOT one, as soon as number portability kicks in I'm out).

    2. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two year contracts are for stupid dumb ass losers. With wireless number portabilty coming up, people have to be pretty dense to sign up for that long. Thank god my contract with Cingular expired two months ago. I'm switching to Verizon in November.

    3. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      Two year contracts save $35 activation cost. If you plan on keeping service for two years, they make sense.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    4. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If what this guys says is true, it sounds like one or more of their HLR's are down.

      A HLR (home location register) is the node in a GSM network that stores yours subscription data and keeps track of where you are. When you turn your phone on, the MSC (mobile services centre, this is the local switch) will query the HLR to find out your subscription level and get some authentication details. If the HLR is down, you can't get on the network.

    5. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1
      > Switching to Verizon

      You'll be glad you did. The network is the only one I've encountered that really does work everywhere, and work well at that. Seems like GSM is just not ready for prime time in the US.

    6. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by mcdrewski42 · · Score: 1

      This is interesting and sounds serious, since if you go out of a coverage area or drop out for a moment (ie: tunnel, poor cell handoff) then the same re-registration will happen.

      --
      /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += effect; }
    7. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by Angram · · Score: 1

      Yup. The contract is two-way. You agree to pay them, they agree to provide a service. They've let down their end, leaving them in breach of contract, so you're free to go.

      --

      GL
    8. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 1
      I have left my phone between the 70-100% charge range and it went out of service. My wife power cycled hers and it actually started working again for a little while.

      I don't think they really know what's going on.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    9. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure they covered their asses with their contract so you cant get out the first time there is a service interruption...in fact it says, in a paragraph headed SERVICE INTERRUPTION which reads:

      "CINGULAR does not gaurantee you uninterrupted service. Airtime and service charges apply to all calls, including involuntarily terminated calls. Subject to limitations below, if your service is interrupted for 24 continuos hours or more, CINGULAR will issue you, upon a request, a credit equal to a prorata adjustment of the montly service fee for the period your service was unavailable, not to exceed the monthly service fee. An interruption is measured from the time you report it to CINGULAR. CINGULAR may require that you request credit in writing."

      "No credit will be be given for a service interruption if evidence of the service interruption is, in CINGULAR's opinion, is inconclusive or it the service interruption was caused by (a) your negligent or wilfull action, (b) the failure of equipment or service not provided by CINGULAR or (c) causes beyond the control of CINGULAR"

      So is sounds like unless you called up and complained (so they can start measuring the interruption), and the interruption is more than 24hrs, you might be able to get some money back

    10. Re:Stuff from Cingular tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't surprise me. I had service with them for over a year before i left. Why'd i go? They couldn't change my number. I mean, they tried, and eventually succeeded, but it took three days and four numbers. It went to level three tech support ("Alice") a few different times. I blame all this on the fact that they _lost_ my provisioning a few months before, and the records never quite got cleared up.

      The system sounded dodgy at best, and probably needed replaced long ago.

  28. Problem started a week ago... by sohojim · · Score: 4, Informative

    My Cingular (Chicago-area) phone quit receiving calls 10 days ago. After 3 days of their horrible tech support, I finally found a rep who said that their system had no record of my SIM card, and that the records must have "gotten lost." He re-entered them, and all was well for two days, and then the problem recurred. This time, I was told that it was a national problem that had occurred a couple of days earlier. During all of this, I've called *611 dozens of times, and the hold times are well above average. I used to work in one of Cingular's Call Center IT departments; I just emailed a friend who's still there to see what's going on...

    1. Re:Problem started a week ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HLR lost all user information for Cingular for Chicago, had to be rebuilt. Customer care reps, pull data from the HLR, since it is the master database for customers. Youre not in the HLR, you SIM wont work, you are lost in limbo my friend.

    2. Re:Problem started a week ago... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      My Cingular (Chicago-area) phone quit receiving calls 10 days ago. After 3 days of their horrible tech support, I finally found a rep who said that their system had no record of my SIM card, and that the records must have "gotten lost." He re-entered them, and all was well for two days, and then the problem recurred. This time, I was told that it was a national problem that had occurred a couple of days earlier. During all of this, I've called *611 dozens of times, and the hold times are well above average. I used to work in one of Cingular's Call Center IT departments; I just emailed a friend who's still there to see what's going on...

      That's odd... one of the guys I work with has Cingular (we're in Seattle), and when he was in Florida two weeks ago, he couldn't get reception out there at all.

      Strange things are afoot, methinks...

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    3. Re:Problem started a week ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get back some of your service fee if you request it in writing (and the interruption was longer than 24hrs) It says so on the back of the Cingular contract

  29. Cingular. It's happened. by questamor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Skynet has become self aware

    1. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Just as long as it doesn't run for public office, I don't care!

    2. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should run for Governor of California. ;-)

    3. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by in7ane · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's running on Cingular's network I wouldn't be worried though.

    4. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      No, no, it's the lawnmower man this time. The dumbass didn't quite realize that trying to ring all the phones in the world would be as complicated as it was...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by Schnake · · Score: 1

      All your base are belong to us!

    6. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, and it's owned by Loral.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Cingular. It's happened. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new cellular overlords.
      Can they hear me now?

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
  30. This is why... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why land lines are a MUST when you want to get back out of the Matrix.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  31. Stupid Carrier... by Aliencow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Errrrr I mean )(/"%*!)( NO CARRIER !

    No carrier jokes never die. They only go offline for a while.

  32. What the message actually is... by mykepredko · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, that ominous sounding message is actually:

    Help, Polly - your receipe for turkey goulash has a gummy taste to it. Can I double the ingrediants so it will fill us all up? Oops, I've got to go, Bill is complaining that the computer's printer port's address is 3bc and I have to show him how to change it. Oh and you were right, Robert Ulrich played Jim Street in the original "SWAT" TV Show. Goodbye

    myke

    1. Re:What the message actually is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Help,pol has a guill us all address is 3 street

      English ?

    2. Re:What the message actually is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was really nice.... bravo!

    3. Re:What the message actually is... by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      What's this...it's modded funny AND it IS!!! Is this a new /. policy!?

      Nice one!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    4. Re:What the message actually is... by bleak+sky · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are a genius. :)

    5. Re:What the message actually is... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I think it needs to be added to, though...

      Help, Polly - your receipe for turkey goulash has a gummy taste to it. Can I double the ingrediants so it will fill us all up? Oops, I've got to go, Bill is complaining that the computer's printer port's address is 3bc and I have to show him how to change it. Oh and you were right, Robert Ulrich played Jim Street in the original "SWAT" TV Show. ... Oh! I just realised I accidentally dialled 911 instead of Polly. Sorry officer, you can go back to sleep now.

    6. Re:What the message actually is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND YOU, MADDAME,

      ARE AN ASSHAT.

      Don't use so many CAPS - Reason; it's like YELLING!

  33. Blame it on viruses by Felinoid · · Score: 1, Troll

    You know it's probably not got anything to do with viruses or worms.
    It's more likely human error.

    You know this is why everyone down the chain needs to start taking responsability.

    Is Microsoft responsable? Yes (not legally I know)
    But so is the Syadmin and the utility that hired him.
    Quite frankly the utility should also be held responsable for agreeing to hold Microsoft blameless with out anyway of fixing it themselfs.
    (I had to add the qualifier becouse with Linux you CAN fix it... With Windows your stuck at Microsofts whims)

    But you know Microsoft should be held blameless for the worms now becouse Microsoft has offered patches.

    Also they could just blame viruses and worms when what really happend is they did something really stupid and won't admit it.

    Baby bell employees ripping digital network hardware out becouse the trainning they have is obsolte and similare stunts...

    ISPs were suing baby bells for refusing to bring in more phone lines or knocking lines out after install or ripping out T1-OCR3 hardware...

    Now we have power companys who could be hit and a celulare company who is at the very least using it as an excuse for a major outage.

    I'm gona start asking cell companys if they run Windows before I sign up. I don't care if they do have a good anti-virus/worm/security policy and armor systems 100% there is still the opratunity to blame human error on malware and not take responsability for major outages.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
    1. Re:Blame it on viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is extremely unlikely to be a virus.

      From all the symptoms described above, the problem sounds like a fault in one or more HLRs (home location registers, see above for a comment that describes what that is). Now many HLRs are based on proprietary platforms, others are based on industrial strength Unices, but I have never heard of one based on Windows...

  34. How about.... by nitrocloud · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    A nice cup of shut the fuck up, you dumbasses. Trolling is only okay if you know what you are trolling about.

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
    1. Re:How about.... by MrLizardo · · Score: 1

      A nice cup of shut the fuck up, you dumbasses. Flamebaiting is only okay if you know what you are Flamebaiting about.

      --
      ^I'm with stupid.^
    2. Re:How about.... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

      Of course I know what I'm flamebaiting about you dumbass! Cingular is quite a large network, and many others are quite crappier. A short outtage isn't as bad as reception only in a few areas if your state.

      --
      Karma: Good, or bust!
  35. Get Rich! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Sign up loads of subscribers to a no-out plan. 2. Don't provide any service, but pretend it's an accident. 3. PROFIT!!

  36. sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    why is it that i can go to the middle of nowhere in europe (scandinavia more precisely) with my t-mobile phone and get excellent coverage and from my apartment in NYC, I generally have to count on my landline? Going skiing in Vermont? Sprint is fine; T-mobile is a string-phone. During the black-out I saw tons of people using their cells, but the t-mobile net was down. Same during 9/11. If Deutsche Telecom can get it right in Germany, then why not in the US? Could it be, americans generally settle for less than europeans, cellphonewise? It's not like it's cheaper in the US, au contraire. So, if it's cell-based in the US, at least get it right within the cells!

    Sorry, had to vent, but this really puzzles me.

    1. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Informative

      "If Deutsche Telecom can get it right in Germany, then why not in the US?"

      Because the US is 4x the size of Western Europe and has less people.

      "It's not like it's cheaper in the US, au contraire."

      It actually is. At least when I looked into plans with major providers (Vodafone, T-Mobile) about a month ago, what we get in the US is far cheaper than what is offered in Europe.

      For example:

      T-Mobile Baisc Plus (USA)
      $30
      Do pay for incoming calls
      300 Peak
      Unlimited Off-Peak/Weekend (9pm-6am)
      GPRS = $3 / mo for 1MB, $10 / mo for unlimited
      No Long Distance In USA
      No Roaming In USA, $.49 in North America, $.99 in Europe

      T-Mobile Everyone 100 (UK)
      21 GBP = $34.87
      Don't pay for incoming calls
      150 peak first year, 100 peak thereafter
      0 Non-Peak
      GPRS 0.75UK = $1.24 *per kilobyte*
      No Long-Distance in UK
      No Roaming in UK, 0.69GBP = $1.14 USD in rest of Europe

      Let's recap
      US Plan Advantages:
      Cheaper
      2x as many peak minutes
      Unlimited (vs. 0) non-peak minutes
      GPRS that's a lot cheaper
      No long distance in a larger area
      No roaming in a larger area
      Cheaper to use in Canada/Mexico (by far) and even Europe

      UK Plan Advantages:
      Calling Party Pays

      Frankly, I think that the US plan is a far better value. For $10 a month, you can even add unlimited calling *anytime* to other T-Mobile phones in the US (e.g. when I call my friends, it doesn't cost a thing).

      I have found T-Mobile's coverage to be perfectly acceptable. I know that some experience signal issues, but, quite frankly, I have not had any problems. No, it's not universal, but it works damn well.

      "why is it that i can go to the middle of nowhere in europe (scandinavia more precisely) with my t-mobile phone and get excellent coverage"

      Ever been to Chimayo, NM? It's the middle of nowhere. Literally. There's 1 town within 20 miles. It has 900 people. And yet they have reliable T-Mobile GSM and GPRS service. This is not universal, but it's more common than you think.

      One reason Sprint and Verizon phones get better converage is because of CDMA. CDMA *is* a better technology than GSM. It handles twice as many people per cell and the cells can be far larger (3x+). Add to that the faster data service and better call quality, and you begin to understand why CDMA is the preferred technology in the USA.

      Post Summary:
      - Mobile service *isn't* more expensive in the US. From my experience, it's cheaper in the US. Please show me otherwise.
      - CPP is nice, but, quite frankly, it's becoming irrelivent in the US. From unlimited nights and weekends to the 600 peak minutes I get to the free calling to and from other T-Mobile phones, I have *never* run over my minute limit. And I call quite a bit. Also, in the US, calling a mobile phone is just like calling a local phone. It's free locally, and cheap long-distance ($.05/min).
      - We have unlimited GPRS. I have yet to see an unlimited GPRS plan in Europe. If you know of one, please show it to me.
      - We *do* have GSM. With SIM cards. 3 Providers. And GPRS. And 3G CDMA. The US has the largest 3G CDMA networks (Sprint and Verizon). 1XRTT may not be as fast as EVDO, but it *is* technically 3G.

      So stop this line of "the US has primitive wireless". It hasn't been true for quite some time now.

    2. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


      The reason is because European countries actually INVESTED in infrastructure. Here in the States, land lines are so ubiquitous that nobody really cares about wireless comm and cell sites are extremely expensive. These factoids combine to make cell companies attempt to get by with the bare minimum.

      If you all only knew how much better things SHOULD be (even in Europe, where coverage stomps its American counterpart) you'd be burning down executive buildings in protest.

    3. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Comparing Europe to America is a little silly, when we need hundreds of thousands of basestations to cover all of America. And then you we have the FCC only permitting so much spectrum per carrier. Cell sites are coming down in price, but its a little more expensive when you have to make it look like a tree, cactus, palm tree or church steepel.

      Those billion dollar loans from foreign telcos are for infrastructure. First to cover North America with a high speed data network, wins.

    4. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Verizon is testing EVDO right now. Sprint and Verizon both have national 1xRTT (144kbps 3G CDMA) networks. You might say that the US is ahead of the game. Compared to Europe, that is, not compared to Japan or Korea.

    5. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Think of the work/cost to replace hardware each time you upgrade. But with 1xRTT and Edge out, next year we will see even faster speeds. Its almost 2004, just as the telcos said they would have the fast UTMS networks out.

    6. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by bomb_number_20 · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%.

      I had a T-Mobile sidekick that, for lack of a better word, sucked. Coverage was spotty, my calls would cut off sporadically and I was unable to make phone calls from my apratment unless I stood in a a certain corner of my dining room. I should add that these problems happened in Chicago- an area where population is no excuse for lack of coverage.

      On top of that, the Danger Sidekick is a joke- a pda with no calculator?? come on. But i digress...

      --
      That's ok, Jesus likes me anyway.
    7. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      I have a Nokia phone with T-Mobile service and I got coverage in all of North Carolina, and Indiana. Even out in the sticks I had full signal. I didn't take it with me when I went out near Chicago tho. The best thing to do is figure out who has a tower close to you and get their service. Your problem sounds like your building was blocking the signals. If you stand near a window or something similar it might be better.

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    8. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      So stop this line of "the US has primitive wireless". It hasn't been true for quite some time now

      Well, prices are one thing. Being in the industry I know that the uptake is poor in the US compared to Europe. I don't have the source I have at work available now. But the penetration of US and Canada combined is only arround 20% if memory serves. Compared to more than 50% in northern Europe (and Italy). With places like Taiwan at 80%.

      So even if you say it's not prices (something some of my workmates don't really agree with) there's something holding back cellular adoption in the US for sure.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    9. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      I pay $10 a year for my GSM cellphone service. For this I get $10 worth of outgoing calls and SMS, and free incoming calls. Yes. $10 per year.

      If I use a calling card (which I do), outgoing calls are on that instead of on the $10 I deposit per year to keep my service. The phone card price beats any deal I've seen from a cell service, and since it's an 800 number it doesn't count against available time on the phone.

      When my friends from the US visit and borrow my GSM phone, they always marvel at the quality of the sound. I had several CDMA phones when I lived in the states, and none of them was even nearly as good quality as any of the GSM phones I've had in Scandinavia. I don't care what the specs and marketing says, GSM has much better clarity than CDMA.

      The US has primitive wireless. They're catching up, but until 800 numbers and incoming calls don't use up minutes they will remain second rate.

    10. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, like everything cell phone in the US: a deal is only a good deal if your plan matches your call patterns. If your plan doesn't match your call patterns, your deal becomes very much a very bad deal.

      Over time, most US cell phone plans have gotten worse.
      - There are many fewer off-peak minutes per month.
      - There are many fewer low cost/low volume plans.
      - Bogus extra charges (like "regulatory fee service charges") have increased quickly.
      - Long term contracts are the norm
      - Contracts are much more restrictive to the customer.

      Better in the US? Maybe, but not compared to two years ago.

    11. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by that_xmas · · Score: 1

      It's a social issue more than anything else. A majority of Americans aren't in the mood to be contacted anytime or anyplace. Personally, until I needed to carry one for work, I would never have thought of owning a cell phone. Plus, it's another monthly fee you have to pay. And, I don't think the US is hip to the pre-paid phone idea, which I believe is how the Italians own their cell phones.

    12. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Its simple really. Wood as a construction component was outlawed in NYC in the 1860's. Thus most people live in brick buildings. Further, as most of these are small each was required for a heavy reinforced firewall (the original type) between them. These walls do not let through high frequency waves like those used by cell phones.

      That being said, I used to live in a 110 year old apartment building in Chelsea and SprintPCS worked fine ;) It all depends on if a tower is facing the front of your building. If it doesn't oh well.

      This is much less of a problem in the boroughss

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    13. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      It's a social issue more than anything else. A majority of Americans aren't in the mood to be contacted anytime or anyplace. Personally, until I needed to carry one for work, I would never have thought of owning a cell phone.

      But you're old, like me... :-) All the 12 year olds have mobiles here, it's their friends calling (or texting) and why wouldn't you want your friends to contact you anytime/anyplace if you aren't at home and don't have a fixed line to begin with?

      That's really how Nokia managed to outcompete Ericsson a couple of years ago. They realised the market was 14 year old girls, not corporates. And of course, inevitably their dads had to follow suit, couldn't take the hassling from their sons and daughters about how uncool their mobile was.

      By the sound of your post the US is indeed at least 10 years behind in uptake as the same argument was heard from the same type of people about then. These people have since learned that a) people really don't call them that much, and b) there's an 'off' button for the other occasions.

      These days, my office doesn't even have fixed extensions, it's all GSM indoors, with a micro base station in the office, and every employee having a company mobile.

      P.S. You're right that pre paid is especially big in Italy, with the overwhelming majority of 'subscriptions' being pre paid there. In the rest of Europe it's for the kids, i.e. you don't want your son/daughter to be able to run up a huge debt on their subscription, and hence give them $10-$15 a month to call for, and when that's up, that's it. No more mobile for you until the next month.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    14. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by jonfelder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, our land lines don't suck.

    15. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok lets recap

      You prepay for your phone service. Sounds nice. How is this a technical problem sounds like a marketing problem to me?

      Your GSM phone sounds better. Ive had GSM phones that sound like hell, landline phones that sound like hell, and CDMA phones that sound like hell. But I have also had the oposite. Where they ALL sound AWSOME. The point to this is you get what you pay for. Buy a cheap phone (like the ones that come with the packages) and they are usually crap. Why? They want you to get out of the deal for the phone (costs money) and buy a 'better' phone (costs more money). So all in all you can get a BADDDDD ass phone for about 200-300 bucks. It will sound awsome. But the 20 dollar phone they give away will not. A friend has a 800 dollar pda/cdma phone. It sounds awsome. But for that price...

      Calling a 800 number using up minutes is not the sign of a 'better/worse' network. Its a way the companies get more money out of you. That is what they do.

      The actual underlying networks are identical except for freq used. You think nokia, motorola, qualcomm, and others build special hardware JUST for europe? Think again buddy they build exactly the same hardware with tweaks to make the run in different freqs.

      Think about this though. Each of the EU's countries has their own phone system. So to build a large network each one builds a small system. Now think about this. You want to build a network that covers the entire united states. What are the cost ratios in that? Take sprint for example. They have excelent lines decent plans and the phones sound good. Yet their coverage sucks if you get off an interstate. Also putting up a cell tower doesnt cost much physically and only takes about a week. But ok you want a tower in the middle of someones yard. That will cost you. The city you are putting this tower in will want some money (per year). The county will want some money (per year). They state will want some money (per year). The fed will want some money (per year). Your are dealling with at least 4 different govermental bodies probably more. Plus hundreds of people with differing agendas. Oh and never mind the favorites played here, company X paid for senators election, but you didnt pay as much. Now you have another goverment body involved. Now try that across land mass 20x the size of GB. Oh and by the way hopefully that tower will actually be used. For it better have a decent ROI.

      Also how much does your landline cost you? It costs me 20 bucks a month. Unlimited local call and 5 cents per min for long distance. Hows that for a uncomplicated plan? And it sounds crystal clear. Why do people in europe like mobile phones? Its simple they are waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay cheapper than landline ones. If it were the other way around you would be ranting about your landline...

    16. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the thing that gets me about cell service in Europe is the international roaming fees. So much of Europe is moving towards integration, but not the cell providers. I have a friend in Belgium with great cell service, as you might expect. But as soon as he goes to the Netherlands, or Germany or France, etc he pays a not insubstantial amount to use his phone.

      Of course the same is true here in the States, but the area in question is so vastly larger: coast to coast no long distance fees, no roaming, and if off peak or calling within the same network, no time limits. That is impressive. Imagine being able to say the same thing in Europe from Dublin to Moscow.

      Now that said, I'm seriously thinking of moving from Verizon to TMobile because I want to be able to seemlessly use my phone when I travel to Europe, but that's a different issue.......

    17. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by ahillen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, our land lines don't suck.

      Hmm, but this still doesn't explain much, since landlines in (at least Western) Europe also don't suck. How comes that I hear that myth about the allegedly bad european land line system always when people are trying to explain that mobile phones are more in use in Europe than in the US?

    18. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      Hmm, but this still doesn't explain much, since landlines in (at least Western) Europe also don't suck. How comes that I hear that myth about the allegedly bad european land line system always when people are trying to explain that mobile phones are more in use in Europe than in the US?

      Indeed. While the market area fixed communication is dead as a doornail these days, that wasn't always so. In fact the land lines in western Europe sucked less than their US counterparts since there was more revenue to be made here. Almost no country in Europe have flat fees for local calls ('unmetered rates' in US parlance), and hence there was more money available for infrastructure investements into equipment for land lines.

      Only today I saw numbers that 93% of 15 year olds in Sweden have a mobile phone. These aren't people who decided to stay with a land line, as they didn't have any before. True, today kids (i.e. 19-23 year olds) don't get a land line when they move from home, opting for the combination of broadband for Internet access and mobile for phone, but again that's not because the land lines are substandard, it's because they've never had a fixed line to begin with.

      Incidentally, the population density argument doesn't work either, since the penetration is the greatest in the nordic countries, with average population densities well below those of the US, and still almost perfect coverage, i.e. even in the wilderness (compared with say Germany, which is geographically perfect for GSM, but still don't have the adoption rates we have). So, there's something else going on here.

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
    19. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $1.49/min to $1.99/min from the South Pacific is enough to make me pay $70 for a SIM card with a ~$21 credit ($0.19/min calls back to the States) and come out ahead for a two week trip. Addons run the same at $0.19/min without the need for a new SIM card. And incoming calls are free.

    20. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      I got my phone for free with my $10 a year prepaid plan. It has better sound than any phone I had in the US. Ironically, it's a Motorola.

      The parent brought up costs, so I countered.

      I have no landline, and I don't know what they cost these days. I agree flat rate is nice, and if it was available here, I'd probably get a landline. As it is, I obviously don't need it.

    21. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Srpint and VZW had an easy path to 1xRTT - all of their equipment was compatible and they only needed to flash the firmware to "switch on" 1xRTT. EVDO won't be so easy; it needs new equipment.

      GSM providers are playing catch-up. Cingular is the first provider in the world to roll out EDGE services, and they just started a few months ago.

    22. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "By the sound of your post the US is indeed at least 10 years behind in uptake as the same argument was heard from the same type of people about then. These people have since learned that a) people really don't call them that much, and b) there's an 'off' button for the other occasions."

      I wouldn't say 10 years. Remember, the first GSM network went up in 1992, and I doubt that 20% of Europeans had GSM phones by 1993.

      We certainly don't have the cellular "culture", but it is becoming much more popular.

      What's stopping uptake is the following:

      - Monthly fee. With a landline, you get one for the family ($30) and you get unlimited calling. If you have a chatty teenager, you get a second line for $20. Local is free, long distance is .03 per minute. With wireless, it's either a high monthly fee for everyone (once the daughter gets a phone the whole family will want one), which can add up to $90 per month, or it's a plan with few minutes where you know your chatty teenager will run up a $80 bill. Alternately, if you go prepaid, your teenager will run out of minutes within days and will complain that they "need more minutes" for "safety". Right.

      So, yes, it is the cost. Cellphones are expensive. The best solution that I've seen is Cricket, which offers unlimited calling for $30 a month (but it only works in your local area). Unfortunately, that's still $120 a month for a family of four. That's more than broadband internet, a wired phoneline, and satellite TV combined.

      Also, uptake *is* picking up in the US. In 1997, there *was* no US cellular market. We had limited GSM service and a whole lot of awful AMPS service. In six years, we have gone from AMPS to 1xRTT. We had 3G data services before Europe (1x is technically 3G) and we will likely have true 3G services soon. In Europe, the market is saturated. GSM service is a commodity. But in the US, that 80% is still very much up for grabs - and the service with the most snazzy bells and whistles for the lowest price wins. US wireless providers realize that people aren't buying because it's too expensive. But lowering prices hurts your bottom line - so they "add value" by adding data. And those ringtones don't hurt their bottom line either.

    23. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "several CDMA phones when I lived in the states, and none of them was even nearly as good quality as any of the GSM phones I've had in Scandinavia."

      That's funny, because we have the same GSM phones and the same GSM technology as you do, and CDMA is far clearer. Less garbling and less fuzz. I know that some GSM providers insert "comfort noise" to cover up the otherwise somewhat jarring shutoff in GSM (it doesn't bother me, but I know others who are driven crazy by it - heck, I know one guy who hates the sound GSM makes during a cell handoff).

    24. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      - There are many fewer off-peak minutes per month.
      Unlimited is fewer?

      - There are many fewer low cost/low volume plans.
      T-Mobile still offers a very nice $19.95 a month plan, plus there's prepaid.

      - Bogus extra charges (like "regulatory fee service charges") have increased quickly.
      Get off of AT&T. I don't pay those bogus charges.

      - Long term contracts are the norm
      One year is a small price to pay for a free camera phone.

      - Contracts are much more restrictive to the customer.
      Huh? My contract just says that I will stay with T-Mobile for 12 months or pay a fee. Same as these contracts have always said.

    25. Re:sorry, but t-mobile is crap too ... by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say 10 years. Remember, the first GSM network went up in 1992, and I doubt that 20% of Europeans had GSM phones by 1993.

      Yes, I was thinking of the most saturated region in Europe: Scandinavia, and the analog Nordic NMT system which really taught us mobile phones. Mobile phones were kind of old hat when GSM was (finally) introduced. NMT was actually good enough that it threatened GSM uptake. (But then GSM phones quickly sported longer stand by times, and got smaller so GSM got off the ground). By '93 the phones had started ringing in the lecture halls of my university even if they weren't yet a complete nuisance...

      As for the cost, I can only conclude that we can tolerate a higher cost here than you can.

      Now, as for the explanations I've heard at work, it's mostly boils down to: a) paying for incoming calls which made (relatively) early adopters relucant to leave their phone number to people and b) not standardising the roaming interfaces leading to incompatible systems where users were locked (phone and all) to one operator. I notice that you don't mention either. Maybe the situation has changed enough.

      It'll be interesting to see how the battle for the 80% you speak of will turn out. Having saturated the market for adults in Europe, the attention turned to the children (and Ericsson, unable to shift gears, lost it's mobile phone division in the process). Just about then SMS also took off, it's where's all the action is today, and hence the hope that 3G/GPRS will be saved by SMS' big brother MMS (and with integrated cameras it just might IMHO). May you live in interesting times and all that... :-)

      --
      Stefan Axelsson
  37. Here's what I think by oasis3582 · · Score: 1

    I think that it is funny that Cingular was the first company to purchase 3G compatible network equipment, and yet they have yet to implement that function nor can they sustain a voice-only network. What is the delay? I guess their logo - the little orange guy with his arms raised - is raising them in a shrug of frustration. :)

  38. Acts of God by DWormed · · Score: 1

    Nope, their contract probably has a "Acts of God" clause. Of course, I'd like to see how they apply it to windows. That hardly strikes me as a "Act of God".

    1. Re:Acts of God by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      It's an act of "Goddamn you Bill, and your entire fucking army of troll programmers!"

    2. Re:Acts of God by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them try to explain in court that God is a fifteen-year-old from Manitoba.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    3. Re:Acts of God by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Judge Jackson say Bill Gates had a God complex? ...or was that Napolean complex.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    4. Re:Acts of God by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      Well, he's probably richer than God, so he's got every right to have that complex.

      Then again every time he looks over his shoulder the Oracle guy has another billion in the bank.

  39. I just hope none of you guys.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rely on cell phones and credit cards for survival.

  40. Hmm by DWormed · · Score: 1

    This presents a "cingular" oppurtunity to thousands of customers...To change their service.

    1. Re:Hmm by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      This presents a "cingular" oppurtunity

      Wow, good one. What makes it really funny is that before your post no one ever made a mental connection between singular and cingular. Great post. Seriously. Keep up the good work. I mean it. Really.

  41. Sorry, I must say it. by ResQuad · · Score: 1

    Go Sprint. Go Sprint. Go sprint and your black trench coat (the kind that comes strait from columbine high).

    1. Re:Sorry, I must say it. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
      The Scene: A police interrogation room. The stereotypical bare lightbulb, and good and bad cop are present. Two suspects in technician's outfits sit across from the officers. Enter the Sprint man...

      First Suspect:You see, I told him to "Stop clowning and see to your work."

      Second Suspect: But I thought he said to "Start downing the Cingular network."

      Sprint guy just shakes his head.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  42. English homonyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't normally pick on you, but two in a row, I can't resist.

    wear I work

    You mean where I work. You wear clothes.

    on sight

    You mean on site. A site is a place. Sight is one of the five human senses.

    1. Re:English homonyms by mechugena · · Score: 1
      They got rid of the whole department because of how they spell.

      Or maybe it was the close they're mommies told them to where. Two many people waring the same thing maid the hole place look dum! (bad spelling on purpose!)

  43. Cingulars HLR was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Our group worked for the last 2 days trying to find out why 1 market was down, (cough) chicago (cough), everything looked correct, no errors on our side.

    Finally (after 20 hours) we traced it down to Cingulars HLR. Just imagine some mobiles that couldnt connect to Cingulars HLR, they report problems to the roamers network nodes, and roamer network nodes alarm and throttle connections. All the sudden, Cingulars HLR now causes outages on other roaming partner telcos. Nice domino effect.

    Right now, the push is to get the hardware up and running, security and availability is the next step. And trust me, the monkeys running the show are busy as hell with duct tape and bailing wire, trying to keep the network running.

    1. Re:Cingulars HLR was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats a HLR?

    2. Re:Cingulars HLR was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cellular-news.com/story/9142_print.shtm l

      Big database that holds all customer information for the SS7 network. SS7 is the network landline telcos have been using for years.

      [snip]
      "The HLR is the heart of the network. It enables the delivery of all subscriber services," said Vivian Hudson, president and general manager, GSM/GPRS/EDGE, Nortel Networks. "This investment will support Cingular's migration from 2G to 3G, help drive reduced capital and operating costs, and position Cingular to more easily launch new, revenue-generating services."
      [/snip]

    3. Re:Cingulars HLR was dead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are incorrect

  44. I haven't noticed any problems... by error502 · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a matter of fact, about thirty seconds after loading this story I got a call on my Cingular GSM phone from one of my friends who also has a Cingular GSM phone.

    1. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where you live, the HLR for the Chicago area was the one it lost its database.

    2. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that be the VLR then?

    3. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      As a matter of fact, about thirty seconds after loading this story I got a call on my Cingular GSM phone from one of my friends who also has a Cingular GSM phone.

      All right, which one of you monkeys rated this "+1 informative"? The poster provides (unsubstantiated) information that TWO Cingular GSM phones, at an undisclosed location, were working at 2:30am. This does not meet the definition of "informative".

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    4. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by op00to · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that you had set the definition for informative. Let me give Mr. Dictionary.com a call and see if he concurs with you:

      informative (n-form-tv) adj.

      Serving to inform; providing or disclosing information; instructive.


      The OP informed us that his Cingular GSM phone worked. Whether that is relevant, on topic, or even true can be debated someplace else.

    5. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      wasn't aware that you had set the definition for informative. Let me give Mr. Dictionary.com a call and see if he concurs with you:

      informative (n-form-tv) adj.

      Serving to inform; providing or disclosing information; instructive.

      The OP informed us that his Cingular GSM phone worked. Whether that is relevant, on topic, or even true can be debated someplace else.

      Relevance and veracity are not in question. By your quoted definition, the information does not meet the definition. The article to which it is attached already characterizes the failure as not total, thereby including the information that "some phones work". The poster above doesn't add anything to that. His geographic location would be additional information, albeit of little use. Merely stating "my phone works" is objectively uninformative.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    6. Re:I haven't noticed any problems... by op00to · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. Informative doesn't say anything about it providing NEW information. If I say "My dog is black all over." That statement is informative. it is providing information about my dog. Then, 5 minutes later, I say "My dog's tail is black", have I provided you with information again?

  45. Have to say it.... by gibbdog · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, the phone network knocks out you!

  46. whew... just barely escaped... by cRueLio · · Score: 1

    wow! i just switched to t-mobile from cingular two days ago... what luck! if this was some type of attack, then they sure as hell deserve. They never gave me rollover minutes, and charged my a lot for a bit of roaming. They got what they deserved!!! Burn, Cingular!!!!! (this is not meant to be flamebait... well actually, i don't know)

    1. Re:whew... just barely escaped... by Tommy+Boomfiger · · Score: 1

      Well now we know who initiated the attack

      --
      ~Tommy Boomfiger http://www.gotapex.com/forums
    2. Re:whew... just barely escaped... by cRueLio · · Score: 1

      lol nah, but they sure deserve it... (*grumbling* pieces of shit)

  47. Cingular Problems by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is an interesting story in the Atlanta Business Chronicle about Cingular getting hit with a $12M fine in California for the poor way that they ran their network and treated their customers.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  48. In other news, SkyNet is ready to go on line. by surfcow · · Score: 1

    ... And while some have shown skepticism of the usefulness or even safety of the massive networking project, voices at the Pentagon are enthusiastic. "This will be the end of networking issues as we know it. EVeryhting will be different after tomorrow."

  49. And therefore... by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

    redundancy is good.

    So does that mean you will be picking up a mistress in addition to your wife?

  50. Cingular... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 1

    Is fine in Middle Tennessee, for the moment.

    Of course, the phone isn't GSM exclusively in this area. My phone does GSM and one other (TDMA?) and if the GSM is failing I assume either the phone is still working in the other band, or the GSM in this area is (luckily) not down (yet).

    Oh well, not that I care. If someone can't reach me online, they're probably not someone I care to speak to.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  51. And wasn't there... by yoshi_mon · · Score: 1

    Some post earlyer about TCP/IP over Bongo Drumbs?

    Expermenting with VOIP is good and all but...

    --

    Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  52. Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by Fastball · · Score: 1

    Goddamn those wristbands...

    1. Re:Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by thebatlab · · Score: 1

      Do people even know what obligatory means anymore? I think all the "Obligatory X quote" comments on slashdot have ruined that word. For the lowdown, obligatory means that there is an obligation to do it. That it *has* to be done. Now, obligatory Simpsons quotes, ok. Those are borderline obligation here. But Dusty Baker? Come on. You had no obligation to make that quote. You just wanted to. Which is perfectly fine and all but...

    2. Re:Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're obliged to shut the hell up.

    3. Re:Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, now we'll get to watch Dusty flicking his tongue like a lizard on the Fox dugout nostril-cam all week. You should hear the delusion on the radio here, they win 88 games and they think they're a shoo-in for the World Series.

    4. Re:Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by Fastball · · Score: 1

      Fox's baseball coverage is a mixed bag, but you are right about the ridiculous closeups. Sometimes their announcers hit the nail on the head, but usually they struggle to pipe down and let the audience "watch." They continue to spearhead the scoreboard-dominates-the-screen department. Used to be you had to pay attention to the game. Now, it's all they can do to prevent you from doing so.

      2003, the year football became a baseball fan's pastime.

    5. Re:Obligatory Dusty Baker troll by Fastball · · Score: 1

      You have a point, but it isn't as profound as another observation I've had reading Slashdot: beginning a post with "Umm," in an attempt to convey superior intellect. Drives me nuts when I see it, which is regularly here. So sorry for the misuse of "obligatory." Yes, I just had to rant about Dusty Baker.

  53. people aren't taking this too seriously by metroid+composite · · Score: 1

    Well, the information I've gotten out of /. in the first few posts has been that (apparently) this started 10 days ago in Atlanta. It (apparently) could be a virus imported from a laptop at home, as such a thing has happened before. And (apparently) the network is back up, and has never been down in certain areas. Other than that it's a whole lot of "5 funny"s, or to be precise:

    Funny +4 Overrated -1
    Funny +1 Underrated +1
    unmoded (attempted joke)
    Funny +4 Redundant -0.5 Overrated -0.5
    unmoded (in Soviet Russia)
    Troll +1 Funny +1
    unmoded (on topic discussion, but nothing too special)
    Funny +5
    Unmoded (on topic, but general observaion)
    Underrated +1 (on topic)
    Funny +2
    Informative +1 (Defintiely a good post; most interesting thing added)
    unmoded (seems like joke, though some info in there)
    Funny +4
    Unmoded (Informative too; possible refunds).
    Interesting +1 (Already back up, hmm)
    Overrated -1 (don't get the joke myself)
    Funny +4 (and it is. This post rocks)
    Interesting +1 (good potential explanation)
    Funny +1 Underrated +1
    Informative +1
    Insightful +1 (and good info if it's true)
    Funny +5
    Informative +1
    Informative +2
    Funny +1
    Funny +3
    unmoded (and I'm not sure what it's supposed to be)
    Troll -1 Interesting +1
    unmoded (and it's insightful too)
    unmoded (and this is funny)
    unmoded (would be funny, but reference to Columbine is in bad taste)
    Funny +1 (huh?)
    unmoded (and just a reply)
    unmoded (attempt at funny)

    Guess there's not much to be said about this, so people just make jokes. Though, the informative topics deserve more priority so that I can pick them out of the crowd. Time to change my settings I guess.

    1. Re:people aren't taking this too seriously by eyeye · · Score: 1

      My settings give a -5 to funny posts.
      I do miss the odd gem i'm sad to say but 99% are "in soviet russia" or whatever the latest meme is that sheep think will be funny to repeat.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  54. "Redundancy is good" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    redundancy is good

    Redundancy is good.


  55. my GSM fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cingular GSM in northern New Jersey (newark area) was down the last 2 weeks, It came back into service this Friday though.

  56. Re-imbursement for 3 days of lost air time by MdntToker · · Score: 1

    What are the chances of us Cingular customers getting reimursed for any of this down time ?? At 0.49 / minute, they owe me about $40 for the weekend...

    1. Re:Re-imbursement for 3 days of lost air time by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      About the same as finding ice water in hell.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  57. I too have been having problems... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 5, Informative
    The switch over to GSM is not going well. I renewed my plan last summer after 2 years of great service with cingular, but I and my Fiance both got new Nokia 6340 (Which is a GAIT phone that works on both regular and GSM networks) phones and have had nothing but problems. I had just gotten back from Europe where I used Vodophone's GSM network quite well and was looking forward to it being in the US, but its horrible.

    At first I thought it was the phone, as it started to drop calls, not ring when people called, and then it started to automatically turn itself off. I went in to the the store owned by Cingluar, I was there for 5 minutes and I had a new handset. This was about the middle of August. Now, this handset is having the same problems and my Fiance's phone has had nothing but problems too. (Her's sets off alarm clocks and electronic devices).

    I live and die by my Cell phone as I use it as my Only phone, business and personal because I am a consultant and often out to visit with clients on a daily basis and perfer to work from coffee shops when ever possible, and to have people call and the phone not even ring has cost me in terms of business and just generally annoying.

    So I finally we both get fed up, so both my Fiance and I walk into store and politely complain about the handsets, and the rep camly states that "They have been having issues with their network and voice mail". I explain, that since this is my one and only phone and I use it for business purposes that I cannot afford to have this type of service and wanted to know about switching handsets. Well, we "couldn't trade in our handsets" and would cost us retail, about $250 - 300 depending on what model, to trade buy something else.

    Then I asked him, "How much is it to terminate the agreement?" and he responded studdering $150. And I then replied, "So it would be cheaper for us to break the contract and go to Alltel, then?" and he responded with silence for a few seconds then answered "yes" and then explained that it was problems with the network, not the phones.

    I then asked him, "Look at it from my perpective. I am a consulant and if someone can't reach me, I loose money. Even a small contract usually totals several thousand dollars." And then I got the "any time with new technology, system, there is going to be problems" and I said, "This isn't a new system. Europe has been using it for quite sometime. In fact I used it when I was there working/studing abroad this time last year and it was great, I had no problems, so why are you? Why are you requiring all customers trade up for new phones that don't work?" He didn't have an answer.

    My Fiance and I then went to AT&T, which isn't much better from what I have heard and way more expensive, and Alltel, which is pretty close to that of Cingular as far as price goes (about $5 difference a month) and for my Fiance is actully a tad bit cheaper.

    That was Thursday and I didn't want to make a judgement based on emotion, because I ticked at the rep that gave me the run around on why the network isn't working even though its not his fault, and looked at the fact of the time it would take to call all of my clients and tell them I have a new number and the fact it would cost me about $8.50 more a month with Altell and decided to stick it out for a bit, but things have only been getting worse.

    My fiance tried to call me 4 times today, only 1 got through and i continue to drop calls left and right. Before, I rarely had dropped calls unless I was in the middle of the sticks, now I get them all the time.

    Bottom line, after reading that this is not just a local problem and speaking with several other providers in the area, that Monday morning my fiance and I are going to go back to the Cingular dealer and break our contract. Yeah its going to cost us $300, but both of us use it for business (she's a wedding planner) and losing just one customer for either of us will be an oppertunity cost of way more than $150. At the very least I go get to expense the cost off my taxes as a business expense so, I guess I break even on paper.

    The only thing that sucks, is I just had a new set of business cards printed...always my damn luck...

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    1. Re:I too have been having problems... by Indy1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i'd refuse to pay the penalty, they arent delivering the service, so why should you have to pay the fuckwits any more?

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    2. Re:I too have been having problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they cannot keep their end of the bargain(basic service, for example), then your contract has been breached and is thus null and void.

    3. Re:I too have been having problems... by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I then asked him, "Look at it from my perpective. I am a consulant and if someone can't reach me, I loose money. Even a small contract usually totals several thousand dollars."

      and

      ...and looked at the fact of the time it would take to call all of my clients and tell them I have a new number and the fact it would cost me about $8.50 more a month with Altell...

      So, it's you're business phone, and your livelihood depends on its reliability, but you balk at $8.50 more per month for decent service?

    4. Re:I too have been having problems... by mcmanzi · · Score: 2

      I am of the opinion that Cingular broke their contract with you by NOT providing the service in which they are contracted to perform...

      If anything they should be paying you... Definately refuse to pay any cancellation fees due to breech of contract on their part ... I'm unemployed, so lets call that my .01

      --
      -- Mitch
      Manzellanews.com
    5. Re:I too have been having problems... by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      it would probably cost for time and money than just paying the fee, unless you want to argue the principle.

    6. Re:I too have been having problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Hey, I thought that that bad customer service was an exclusive trait of European telco culture. Don't raise your blood pressure over this, c'est la vie.)

      Quality of service is determined by their network planning. Things like: GSM cells in rural areas only extend for 50 kms or so but have enough capacity for the users there, in metropolitan area's the size is much smaller because the maximum user capacitiy fills out quickly. Also the problem with reflections against buildings, etectera.

      The GSM networks in EU have been tweaked for 15 years now. No surprise then that every nook & cranny has good reception now. In the early days it didn't.

    7. Re:I too have been having problems... by szmccauley · · Score: 1
      Break your contract. Then call your lawyer and sue the fsckers. They shouldn't be able to collect a fee from your for service that does not work, number one. Document as best you can all instances of unavailable service. And number two, they shouldn't be able to collect a fee for breaking the contract. That's just criminal.

      Mind you, by the time it got to litigation they may very well be out of business.

      Perhaps a slashdot initiated class action suit is the way to go, of course, IANAL, but it would be a pretty powerful voice if all slashdotters in the same position got together and paid off some high priced lawyers to sink cingular.

    8. Re:I too have been having problems... by Inode+Jones · · Score: 1
      At first I thought it was the phone, as it started to drop calls, not ring when people called, and then it started to automatically turn itself off.

      This could very well be the phone. Nokia is shit. I had a Nokia 6188 (CDMA) on Telus that did exactly that - exhibited all three of your dysfunctions.

      My problems went away when I bought an Audiovox phone.

      Granted, you are on GSM and not CDMA, but Nokia could very well be using common components that give rise to these problems.

    9. Re:I too have been having problems... by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 1

      The switch over to GSM is not going well. Go for Verizon. They're a bit more expensive, but there's few areas they don't cover (rural New Mexico) and I've have great service most of the time.

      -B

    10. Re:I too have been having problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go and get yourself a free firmware upgrade from Telus. I also have a Nokia 6188 and they had big problems with their version 4.3x and 4.4x series of firmware. The latest version 5.42 firmware makes the Nokia 6188 better cell phone than a lot of the newer models.

    11. Re:I too have been having problems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      sir - if your livelyhood depends on it, may I suggest that you not make your cell phone decisions based on price? Cingular sucks; 5 minutes of research online should tell you that. Sprint sucks as well. And while there are many people who have problems with them, Verizon and ATT generally have the best overall service. (That especially surpises me because my dealings with Verizon on various telecomm issues including T1s, DSL, and both residential and commerical landlines have left me desiring to go to their corporate HQ with a large capacity shotgun) Not surprisingly, they also cost the most. But is 10 or 15 dollars a month extra worth having good service to you?

      I dumped Sprint after dealing with their crappy service for a year. Paid 150 to break the contract it was so bad. I went with ATT's GSM service. It has overall been excellent. Very few busy signals, good coverage, and of course you can use phones that will work in Europe as well. Their GSM coverage is not as widespread as I would like yet, but it has worked in the 10 major cities I have been to in the last year.

      Also, I might suggest that if you can wait a few months, you can take advantage of the number portability on cellular calls if your number is important. I can guarantee that their will be massive deals from all the big carriers to try to churn users when that portability is in place.

    12. Re:I too have been having problems... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Because their contract says that they're not responsible for the occasional failure of service. Switching providers won't get you an insurance policy against this happening again because they all have similar don't-blame-us language in their contracts.

    13. Re:I too have been having problems... by virtualkuz · · Score: 1

      I work for a wireless provider. Nobody actually reads the terms and conditions for the contracts, but it pretty much boils down to you agree to pay the company however much and we in return will "TRY" to provide you service. No guarantees, no assurances, and it isn't our fault if you can't make a call. Cellular service by anyone is not 99.999% reliable. I wouldn't even give it 95%, which is really horrible from a mission critical need standpoint.

    14. Re:I too have been having problems... by XO · · Score: 1

      The 618x never passed QC for Verizon, and Sprint's QC dept at the time blew ass, so that particular model of phone (618x) was a pile of poo in CDMA modes.

      Nokia makes awesome phones. Just the early CDMA models (since they refuse to license Qualcomm's CDMA chipset) really blew ass.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    15. Re:I too have been having problems... by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      Umm, they aren't providing service. Doesn't matter what the terms of service are. They aren't providing service and you can get out of the contract. If you have any problems file a report with your public utility commission. I broke my ATTWS contract last year and ATT agreed to wave the termination fee. But I didn't like that deal since it took me 1 month of nagging to get it, so I filed report with the PUC. I had some Attws on the phone after a month asking me what it would take for me to change status of PUC iccident to reseloved. I manged to get some extra money out of the deal since ATTWS service did effect my business.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    16. Re:I too have been having problems... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I would go with Verizon if they were in this area, but they aren't. The choices are Sprint, AT&T, Nextel, DT/voicestream, and Alltel. Alltel piggy backs their nationwide service on Verizon's network. Also when I say its $8.50 more a month, I am also considering the two days worth of lost work time to inform customers that the phone number has changed etc. and thus far I have not lost any contracts, but it could. I am going to complain again tomorrow. I have a couple hours tomorrow and I have a couple weeks until my next billing period. I got my Motorola handset that I purchased in Europe (tri-band & GSM) and swapped out the Vodophone SIM card with my Cingular SIM. Call quality isn't as great as my Nokia, but I am still getting dropped calls, but at least its not powering off. Last time they had to adjust the battery. The viberating battery was a *great* engineering feat, considering it shakes the battery loose after a while the connectors have to be readjusted. I've read the press reports about the quality of AT&T and Verizon, but what the press is saying and what my customers say about their service is two different things. My Customers that use AT&T have had similar issues as I with Cingular lately as well and their "home" calling area and the way they handle night/weekend minutes outside of this area sucks. It covers the western half of Missouri, but I do about 40% of my business in St. Louis and Southeast Missouri, where AT&T gets no signal at all, or if you do its still analog. Cingluar and Alltel are the best as far as coverage goes in those areas. I know several people with verizon and everyone loves their basic service. Their new "push to talk" feature I've heard stinks, but Nextel isn't any better if not worse and Verizon would be my first choice if they actully had resellers or stores in this area, they don't. I am considering giving Cingular time until the number portablitity gets here. Then I am going to switch proably to Alltel.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    17. Re:I too have been having problems... by Indy1 · · Score: 1

      hmm, granted i am not a lawyer, but i'd bet you could have that part of the contract tossed out as unreasonable by a judge. If they dont deliver the service, then they dont deserve the money. Occasional failure is a dropped call here and there, not the whole damn network dropping out and dying for a day or two.

      --
      Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  58. Re:overdue? never. by PurpleRabbit · · Score: 1

    After calling Cingular this afternoon to find out the problem with incoming calls, I have been credited with $20 as compensation for the poor service for the last 2 days.

    I can still make outgoing calls but no-one can get hold of me. Shame ;-)

    --



    I'm on a whisky diet. I've lost three days already.
  59. Now everything is being blamed on viruses. by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    However, even if Cingular's network was taken down by a virus, that still demonstrates incompetence on their part.

  60. Hah! by Solokron · · Score: 1

    Their roll over plan does work!

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  61. The real reason... by banzai75 · · Score: 1

    Terrorists have cut the string that attached the two soup cans together.

  62. Their new slogan... by Tracy+Reed · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Can you hear me YET?"

  63. Do NOT worry Sky*NET will be online within hours! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 funny.

    Please do not worry anyone,
    Sky*NET will be online in few hours,
    it will scan the internet, phone networks,
    military networks and get rid of any virus/trojan.

    Hopefully, this BETA version of this AI software
    ain't broken and won't spread like a trojan horse into all connected computers to turn them into
    slave machines to rule out the world of those stupid humans who are completely useless anyway.

    -- Terminator 3... The end.

  64. AMPS is good... by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason to keep the AMPS (old analogue cell network) online. Yes, it's not used all that often, but it's the network in place for countless emergency and periodic industrial applications (OnStar, for example) and it's a backup that is supported on nearly every phone out there. (did you buy a single-mode phone?)

    Yes, it's a price and spectrum hog, but it should be there as a backup. The cell companies should not be allowed to have backup systems for something as vital as cellular communication.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:AMPS is good... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The problem is that AMPS is used by a dwindling number of users and there isn't enough spectrum at 800 MHz to keep it and 800 MHz CDMA/GSM/TDMA running at full capacity. AMPS will eventually disappear, at least in urban areas where channel capacity is a problem. The FCC is planning to remove the requirement to support AMPS within 5 years.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:AMPS is good... by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the government is requiring the operators to stop using AMPS in 2008. And the operators will likely stop offering the service much sooner.

  65. Last month-NIC Firewalls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like this?

  66. Yeah right. by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

    Everytime they fsck up, it's a virus. Convenient excuse, isn't it? After all, every average Joe by now has had encounters with virii.

    Of course one might say that virii are almost extinct nowadays and that what the average Joe thinks is a virus is really a worm, but oh well...

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  67. Proprietary Pish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The redundancy is already there in the form of his right arm (its always good to fall back to traditional, more mechanical and reliable machinery occasionally).

  68. Time to get a job?! by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    You have far, far too much freetime on your hands. And if you're going to reply to this saying you can't find a job, I have some code monkey work for you.

  69. The don't.... by LazLong · · Score: 1

    They don't call it Crapular for nothing....

  70. Motorola GSM phones are crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allways have been. Motorola never invested in the GSM and it shows. That is why Nokia beat the crap out of them.

    1. Re:Motorola GSM phones are crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fuck you. My job is working on the software for Motorola's GSM phones. Have you noticed what Motorola's been doing for the past year or so? TDMA is basically dead, we're buying all of our CDMA shit from Qualcomm, and who cares about 3G? The only place left that we're actually doing "real work" is GSM.

      Motorola's recent GSM offering: the C33x and C35x are awesome products. They are small, feature-light, great-performing phones. I'll admit that the T720 was a mess -- I didn't work on it.

      Motorola's GSM protocol stack is world-class. If you want to complain about the UI, features, or lack of a "cameraphone" in our portfolio, I'll listen. Anything else: you can go to hell.

  71. No T3! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.. Skynet is starting to take over the world!

  72. Funny though... by zeruch · · Score: 1

    ...SBC had just called me today with a telemarketing schlep asking me about switching to Cingular and getting a 'good deal' because I am a 'valued SBC customer'..... I said 'no'. I am now even more glad that I did. My brother had already had endless problems with Cingular.

  73. HA-hah [al la Nelson] by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1

    It is times like these that I am glad that I live in Europe and have yet to purchase a cell phone (one of the .0001% of Swedes who do not have a cell phone).

  74. Yay Outsourcing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like Patinder and Jatinder's code fixes (wow, it's AMAZING how cheap these guys are! Lay off some more USian workers!) somehow crashed the system.

    Listen, I've put some calls in to the Jajau Hair Oil Factory and Computer Programming Company - but Bangalore's in a different time zone, they'll still be asleep!

    Oh I dunno, tell the tech support in Delhi to tell customers something. Anything. We have obscene CEO pay and stock options to inflate!

  75. Slashdotting phones... by freeBill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...actually happened at a company I worked at once.

    We sold transcripts of TV shows, including the old "Phil Donahue" shows in the early '90s. There was a lady on the show who called herself "The Recipe Detective." She had a column in a small-town newspaper which was pretty popular there. She took famous foods and tried to figure out how they were made: Twinkies, Oreos, Kentucky Fried Chicken, things like that. Then she published her recipes so you could make them yourself. Donahue thought this would be popular on his show.

    Oh, boy, and howdy.

    The Recipe Detective made the same offer on the show that she did in her newspaper column: "Send me a self-addressed, stamped envelope, and I'll send you whichever recipe you want." This turned out to be the biggest mistake of her life. She got over a million replies. Just sending the envelopes back with an apology would have bankrupted her. So, the next time she was on the show she apologized to all the nice people who had written her and told them they could get the recipes and transcript by calling our company. And she gave our 800 number and address.

    Thirty seconds later our phones began to ring.

    We had two T-1s for our phone lines because the calls tended to come in spikes right after our number appeared on national television. (And you thought Voice Over Internet Protocol was a new thing.) The T-1s were maxed out within five seconds and stayed that way for a week. It turned out that not only had our own lines been overloaded, but our long-distance provider's cross-country fiber-optic lines had not had the capacity to carry that many calls. (Not that it mattered to our customers. A busy signal is a busy signal.)

    Even the post office was slashdotted: The trays of mail (boy, did our delivery guy hate us!) filled up all the halls on one floor of our building.

    We switched to MCI because they had special ways of dealing with these kinds of problems: They could put our overflow into a voice-mail service on which customers could leave a call-back number. If their cross-country capacity was exceeded they could take the calls in the every local region and store them in voice-mail there.

    When Donahue reran the second Recipe Detective show, he gave us a heads-up it was coming. So we told MCI it was on its way. And we had extra people ready for the onslaught. It happened again, but we had all the special procedures in place. After 24 hours MCI called (we had set up a special line so they could get through). It seems their hard drives were almost full and could we please start listening to and removing our voice-mail messages? Well, not very easily since all our lines were still jammed with incoming calls (and MCI's voice-mail system was accessed by phone). So we hired people to work out of their own homes to listen to the voice-mail messages and compile gigantic lists of call-back numbers.

    --
    Eternal vigilance only works if you look in every direction.
    1. Re:Slashdotting phones... by LanceTaylor · · Score: 1
      The Recipe Detective made the same offer on the show that she did in her newspaper column: "Send me a self-addressed, stamped envelope, and I'll send you whichever recipe you want." This turned out to be the biggest mistake of her life. She got over a million replies. Just sending the envelopes back with an apology would have bankrupted her.

      I don't think it would have bankrupted her since the envelopes were supposed to be pre-stamped. However, it would have taken her the rest of her life to send that many replies.

    2. Re:Slashdotting phones... by kuroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      > There was a lady on the show who called herself "The Recipe Detective."

      Was?

      For information and 20 free recipes, send a SASE to:

      Gloria Pitzer
      Box 237
      Marysville, MI., 48040

      Ms. Pitzer publishes a number of cookbooks, all of which you can order directly. Information here. She also publishes a quarterly newsletter for $16 per year, send it to the same address.

      Ms. Pitzer is on WNZK 690AM out of Detroit every Tuesday from 10:30am to 11:00am. You can listen to the program that she appears on over the internet here.

    3. Re:Slashdotting phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely Random Symantics Correction:

      Voice over a T1 is NOT Voice over IP.

      In face T1's were designed for digital voice deliverey, not data, that came later.

      A T1 is 24 channels (of 56k of 64kbps each), where each of the 24 is equivalent to one POTS line for call capacity.

      So with 4 Ts, you had a capacity for 96 simultanious calls. No wonder you were busy....

    4. Re:Slashdotting phones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A T1 is 24 channels (of 56k of 64kbps each), where each of the 24 is equivalent to one POTS line for call capacity.

      In fact, you have to configure your router to tell it which channels are DATA. By default these days, they assume all channels are data. However, many smaller businesses use several channels for voice and the rest for data, all one the same T1.

  76. Virus? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Remind me again how do you get a virus on a mobile network? Ive heard of text-message virii that can go around phones but thats just stupid, what idiot cant design a phone that cant handle a 160 byte plain-text message securly? buffer overflow my ass. If on the other hand they mean a virus thats affecting their actual computers that control the network then thats just as stupid unless they mean some disgruntled tech whos planted it.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Virus? by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing things here. The sms virus you're probably thinking of, was never a real virus, just a badly formatted message that would crash certain (old) Nokia phones.

      When they talk about viruses here, I think they're probably talking about viruses in the infrastructure.

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  77. Oh dear.. by 98jonesd · · Score: 0

    GSM in the USA aint very good is it? Here in England, I have been on Vodafone for 4 years, and the biggest outage was 1 day when a flood killed a main Microwave relay station... Vodafone rulez, O2, Orange and T-Mobile suck. Big time.

  78. Crosschecked by Aceticon · · Score: 1

    Just for curiosity, i did crosscheck prices with other GSM providers in Europe (more specifically KPN-mobile in Holland). Also i'm under the impression that most things in England tend to be more expensive than in mainland Europe.

    I found out as follows:
    [KPN-mobile Holland]
    Hi 30
    30 EUR = $34.44 USD
    Don't pay for incoming calls
    200h or SMS's at Peak or non-peak (calls or sms's beyond the free minutes cost 0.22 EUR = $0.25 USD per-minute/per-sms)
    GPRS 1Mb bundle - 10 EUR = $11.48 USD
    No Long-Distance in Holland (ie all calls are local)
    No Roaming in Holland, 0.59 EUR = $0.67 USD in rest of Europe
    Notes:
    - There are other plans available, from Hi 20 to Hi 80.
    - Prices are per-minute but calls charges are determined per-second after the 1st minute (ie a 1m23s call will cost you 1 + 23/60 minutes).
    - Roaming in Europe prices are per minute for calls within the country (peak or non-peak). Only checked France and Britain, prices might be different in other countries in Europe. For roaming calls you can choose your local provider, i only listed the cheapest prices found.

    The conclusions are still very much the ones of RzUpAnmsCwrds, even if not quite so outrageously.

    However, all over Europe prepaid plans are available. This means no monthly charges, no free minutes and more expensive per-minute/per-sms costs. On the other hand, receiving calls is still free.
    For those that mostly receive calls (and make few calls from the mobile), this turns out to be incredibly cheap (still, the calling side pays mobile charges even if from a fixed phone).

    It's not by chance that in Western Europe, 1998, prepaid subscribers represented 37% of all subscribers (check here). The forecast (found in the same place) forsees that by 2008 about half of all mobile phone subscribesr will be prepaid.

    1. Re:Crosschecked by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "However, all over Europe prepaid plans are available."

      We have that too; you can buy the cards in gas stations. Few people opt for prepaid, however, because we don't get incoming calls free (a bummer if you don't have many minutes) and you don't get as many minutes for your $ as a non-prepaid plan.

      Cingular also offers an intersting option in the US - rollover. You can keep the minutes you don't use (for up to 12 months). They are slightly more expensive than the competition, however.

      I have found that T-Mobile has the cheapest plans in the US; Verizon is the most expensive. Verizon also has the best coverage, however.

  79. OMG by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Skynet is becoming active!

  80. Re:Close, but no cigar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't get off on pumping the cat last night, ehh?

  81. Re:And therefore... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have one thanks! :-)

  82. Re:And therefore... by 87C751 · · Score: 1
    So does that mean you will be picking up a mistress in addition to your wife?
    Sometimes, that's the only way you can get any work done.
    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  83. Re: dundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why it's good to have KDE & Gnome... ... and XFCE, which is what I'm using now... ... and XPDE (yuck!), and... well, check it at www.xwinman.org

    PS1: if you got Opera, mark the link and click with the middle-button in the tab bar, outside a tab

    PS2: if you have a 2-button mouse, press ctrl-shift and click the same way, this time with the left button

  84. Good opportunity by Oswald · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have nothing truly on-topic to add here, since my phone only speaks TDMA. But since my wife and I are impatiently waiting until November 24 so we can change providers (and keep our phone numbers), and since we have already put up with almost 3 years of ever-deteriorating "service" (e.g. I can hold my phone in my hand, observe that I'm receiving 2 or 3 cells, dial myself from another phone--and get my voice mail about one time in five) from these fuck-wads, this seems like the perfect forum to say

    KISS MY ASS, CINGULAR!

    This company is being mis-managed into the ground. They're so bad that I'm half-afraid to sign up with Verizon (which is very good around here) for fear that I will be part of a herd that overwhelms their network and end up in the same straits.

    Avoid Cingular.

  85. Gads. What a commentary upon society by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Consider how big a flap this outage is causing. Consider how many people feel their whole life has been turned upside down.

    Now, ask yourself how many of those people's lives REALLY have been turned upside down.

    For a small set of the population, having mobile communications is critical. But that set is MUCH smaller than the set of people who THINK mobile communications are critical. Folks, there are answering machines with remote playback and pay telephones. There is even the idea of WAITING - that this conversation can take place LATER.

    I was on a business trip a while back. I was asked by one of our Marketing directors what my cell number was. "I don't have a cell." He was shocked. "I don't need one. When I am not traveling, I can make all the personal calls I want on the local autopatches. Business calls can damn well wait till I am in the office. When I am travelling on vacation, the only calls I need to make are to hotels to book a room, and those are toll free and I can use a payphone at a gas station. When I am traveling on business the company can damn well loan a phone to me."

    I'm not a Luddite - quite the contrary, I help design test equipment for cell phone. I know too well what the systems look like. That is one of the reasons I don't have a phone.

    For $DEITY's sake folks, unplug once in a while - you will find out that you live quite well without the phone!

    1. Re:Gads. What a commentary upon society by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


      Pleased to meet you. I wondered if I was the last person in America to not have a cellphone--but now I've met the other person!

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  86. Power Failure by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    The theory I've seen kicked around here a couple times (and on the Howard Chui forums) was that it was a power outage.

    How exactly does a power outage spread nationwide? (I'm not talking about the recent nationwide power outage we blamed on Canada. It seems that only Cingular had this 'nationwide power outage.) How do they accomplish this?

    Am I overlooking something, or does it not make any sense that they'd go down nationwide due to 'power problems?'

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Power Failure by timlewis_atlanta · · Score: 1

      It's more likely that the "power failure" is a problem with a software patch which has been applied to some of their switches, or a patch to their switch management software. Those switches which haven't been patched yet won't be affected.

  87. polygamy-- by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    now that's redundancy.... A Wife & Mistress is like a hard drive with cdr backups, ones solid, the other is sleek and shiny.. I prefer raid 0,

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  88. At least they're not Sprint PCS by ventivent · · Score: 1

    I had Sprint PCS for 2 years, reception was terrible. I would be sitting in my apt talking, in the middle of Downtown Chicago and it would just drop. Called customer service to complain and argued with them about the poor service for 45 minutes...after that the poor woman said: "Can you call me back in a landline? I can't hear what you're saying." That got me out of the contract without paying the termination fee.

    Now I've got T-mobile...it rocks.

  89. Last month-We shoot the responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If "negativity" is "your fault!", then who's taking credit for the positive things that happen?

    1. Re:Last month-We shoot the responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      managment... duhhhh.

  90. LDAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Here's my take:

    Cingular uses an LDAP database for phone authentication. When you fire your phone up, it will auth against their directory.

    They were in the process of updating these LDAP systems to use OpenWave's directory server. A master and a slave system in Atlanta, and a slave system in Chicago.

    Looks as though Atlanta LDAP's failed, and Chicago couldn't handle the load. This would also explain why they told those of us calling support not to restart our phones.

    That's what you get for using OpenWave, I guess!

    1. Re:LDAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which, really... was just a guess. I don't know what the hell really happened.

    2. Re:LDAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er no, that's what you get for not having enough servers to cope with the load

    3. Re:LDAP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't remember what exactly they had, but I remember thinking "wow, that's it? THAT handles it?"

      Honestly, I'm not an OpenWave fan, though.

  91. Ummmm by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    This guy says he may loose thousands of dollars from missing a few calls, and then complains that the competition will cost him $8.50 more per month??? Funny how the mind works when you're so mad ;-)

  92. Not really by theolein · · Score: 1

    Here is Switzerland just out of curiosity, I checked the prices on the biggest company, Swisscom, and found the following for the most expensive package (International):
    Monthly charge CHF 45
    GPRS CHF 0.19 / 10 kB (unlimited)
    Normal hours: CHF .040/minute
    Low hours: CHF 0.30/minute
    Night/Weekends CHF 0.20/minute
    GSM Roaming
    HSCSD (Data at 56kbps)
    Voicemail
    SMS (and MMS)
    Conferencing
    Call waiting

    This is expensive for calling but it's very reliable (I've used my phone in Germany, South Africa, Australia, France and Holland with no problems)

    GSM is simply the best in international terms. Very few countries use CDMA whether it's better or not and that number (apart from Iraq) is dropping. I expect that in the US most will eventually switch over to GSM eventually.

    1. Re:Not really by EchoMirage · · Score: 1

      GSM is simply the best in international terms. Very few countries use CDMA whether it's better or not and that number (apart from Iraq) is dropping. I expect that in the US most will eventually switch over to GSM eventually.

      Probably not. The GSM Consortium is eventually going to have to get off its ass and release a GSM 2 spec. CDMA is a superior technology, hands down. It always has been. GSM uses TDMA, which is more ubiquitous but far far far less efficient. GSM works in much of the world because with most companies there's a small physical space and the populated areas are densely packed. But time-sharing the radio waves rather than packet-tagging them is archaic; c.f. Sprint PCS in the U.S. providing far superior Internet and messaging capabilities than its GSM competitors (too bad their customer service sucks).

      GSM isn't the holy grail of mobile technology, as many Europeans and Asians want to believe. I'm not trying to sound condescending, but just because what you have works doesn't mean its good.

      And of course, all of this could be rendered moot if a cellular-over-802.11x ever gets rolling. That would really be something, but there are many hurdles to clear yet...

  93. I work for a cell company by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

    That wouldnt even come close to working. I havent seen Cingulars contracts, but I can garuntee you there is a provision in there that states that service isnt guarenteed. Its the nature of cellular service, you will not get service 24/7. This looks to be a large problem effecting lots of people however the contract you have between them and you is between them and you the lots of other people are irelavent. You should check on getting credits for the outage, if you cant use your phone theres no reason to pay for that portion of service.

  94. Cell phone question by RayBender · · Score: 1

    I know this is slightly off topic, but I figure I have a decent chance of actually getting this read by someone who knows something about cell phones and how the base stations are programmed. So here goes..

    I've noticed that when I'm on the phone for more than about 5-10 minutes the probability that I get dropped goes up dramatically (AT&T phone in the Boston area). Even if I don't get dropped, the quality of the link drops, with lots of hash and breakups. After I get dropped, if I immediately call again, the call comes through clear as a bell. That sort of thing has happened at least a dozen times in the last week. I'm not driving or walking when this happens, so it's not a question of getting closer to an antenna.

    Do the base stations have a priority listing where they will drop old calls to accept new ones?

    --
    Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
  95. This is new? by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    My Cingular service has been crap for years! Nothing new here.

  96. "redundancy is good." by jabber01 · · Score: 1

    You can say THAT again!

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  97. New Escuse: Virus.. by nolife · · Score: 1

    I really don't know what caused Cingular networks problems but I HAVE noticed an increase in blaming problems on viruses. Maybe there really is a connection but it seems odd. Our company switched all of our data over to Sprint recently and within a week we had major packet loss. Sprints answer was the Blaster virus. Well for the past month we have had the same sporadic packet loss and I really doubt the Blaster virus is the root cause. Recently they moved us over to "a different blade" to try to resolve one of the outages. Sounds like people are very quick to jump on the virus bandwagon. Veritas seems to be taking the same road. Their first step for any troubleshooting always seems to you reboot everything. Then they move on to the potential virus thing. I take it with a grain of salt, maybe it is, maybe not but seems like an excuse.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  98. And did you say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Oh by the way... You're welcome!"

  99. I for one... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new Cubbie overlords.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  100. If it was a virus, thanks alot! by maudite · · Score: 1

    I gave up my landline 4 years ago. I never talked on the phone much anyway. My internet is via broadband. My Cingular cell-phone sits on a table and pretends it is a landline. My parents live in Florida and I live in Indiana. My father (59 years old) had a stroke and since I do not chat on the phone much I had no idea it was down. It took my family 8.5 hours to track me down via other means. Thanks Cingular. Or thanks Mr. Hacker if that turns out to be the case.

  101. On the topic of other providers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW:

    I didn't like Cingular's policies regarding calling plan features and pricing when I was looking at a new carrier a couple years ago.

    I ended up with Voicestream (T-Mobile). They not only had the simplest pricing plans (no roaming charges within the U.S.) and only $10 (at the time, I think it's $20 now for new contracts) to add an additional phone to the family plan.

    Verizon at the time, and still today, can't offer anything near it in the realm of price/features. Their customer support (my girlfriend has Verizon, and I've been there when we've talked to their representatives and tech support).

    AT&T wireless doesn't have any service in the upstate NY area unfortunately, but they also have some limitations. They allegedly locked their T610s to prevent downloading MIDIs except from their $1 a download portal? And MMS mesages are $.35 whereas they only cost the data transferred with T-Mobile ($3.99 for 1MB, $9.99 unlimited--$19.99 for unlimited, unrestricted [non-wap-proxied] Internet).

    With that said, my *1yr* contract with them is up (they seem to be the only carrier still using 1 year contracts) and I have an unlocked phone. If they ever do something that I don't like, I'll be looking for a new carrier (especially after November and portable numbers :)

  102. And Nobody Else Knows About This? by klausner · · Score: 1

    Curious that Google
    News has NOTHING
    on this besides the /. report!

    1. Re:And Nobody Else Knows About This? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Infoworld has some details.

  103. Cingular Matrix by teledyne · · Score: 0

    Neo: "Operator, I need a hard line!"

    *unexpected click*

    Neo: "Damn!"

  104. GSM is *still* premature by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Cell phones are supposed to do AT LEAST what POTS did and THEN you add value. The sad truth is that too much of the time they're not even giving us a decent connected call like plain old copper. If the phone on your wall did this poorly, you'd yank it out and go back to hollering.

    I had t-mobile (voicestream or whatever it used to be called) and it was crap. Put up with it for a year and a half, and it never got any bettter. And this was in the northeast, it's most saturated area.

    Had dual mode Cingular, and it was good. And it had email from phone to phone as well.

    Recently combined my wife's and my plans to the Cingular GSM system. And the free phone is a Siemens. Both are crap. Apparently SMS only (unless I can't read a manual). the Siemens phone is as anti-intuitive a piece of electronics as I have ever seen - slow - everything is stored on the sim card by default, and apparently it's a 110 baud transfer - actually getting to a menu or retrieving a number to dial takes a dog's age compared to other sims phones I've had.

    Voice messaging is taking up to 1.5 days and often hours to register a voice message on a phone (yes - in range and turned on).

    Cingular has no explanation for the strange series of beeps and boops the line makes when attempting to complete a call - they even say I need to call Siemens.

    And yes, we're upset - because in the case of an emergency or work, the phone can be mission critical or life threatening. I once sat broken down in a hole in the Voicestream coverage on the Mass Pike for nearly two hours in the middle of the night. Yes, I would have been in the same situation without a cell phone - but the point is they claim convenience and service and safety (then make the fine print say don't ever count on us).

    My wife misssed a major piece of work because the messages are taking hours, and she's not happy.

    Two worst takeovers in New England history: Fleet taking over (your bank's name here) and SBC taking over SNET. (Dan Duquette is gone, so no use naming the third, but Jan 26, 2004 can't come fast enough - he still gets paid til then). Both have gone south on a rocket sled since - SNET were local folk who knew what was going on and knew who could solve a problem.

    Their system has screwed the pooch, and we don't care how hard it is to fix - it's not our problem. It's theirs, and they need to get it done.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  105. Class Action by yerricde · · Score: 1

    the contract you have between them and you is between them and you; the lots of other people are irrelevant.

    Two words: Class Action.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Class Action by qwertyatwork · · Score: 1

      What exactly would you sue them for? As long as they make some kind of minimul effort (say a $5 credit for the time lost) then theres nothing to sue for.

  106. That would explain it.. by dancingmad · · Score: 1
    I spent the Weekend at Anime Weekend Atlanta and was basically using my phone as a glorified walkie-talkie for the most part. However, yesterday and today especially I've been getting spotty service when making calls and I'm not really getting many incoming calls.

    I just thought people didn't want to give me my dealer's room badge back...

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  107. You need both by kjd · · Score: 1

    ...internal host/network security and perimeter security. Firewalls won't help when you walk a virus into the office and plug it into your internal network, but they'll certainly help give you time to upgrade e.g. ssh on all your internal systems without nearly as much chance of suffering a successful attack from the outside.

    On the other hand, automated corporate desktop patch updates and virus signature updates should help mitigate the "laptop" sort of issues.

  108. GSM used to be fine for me by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    I had a VoiceStream / Nokia GSM phone in the NYC area in 2000-2002 and I had much better reception than my friends on other CDMA/TDMA networks. Generally every city I had to go to (San Francisco, Chicago, Houston, Charleston SC, Detroit) worked fine with GSM, though I found I would have no reception in smaller cities in states like Virginia. I was quite content with GSM.

    I moved to Toronto in 2002 and have a Rogers AT&T Wireless GSM phone (a BlackBerry 5810). Toronto reception for GSM is OK, but GPRS reception tends to suck (making the BlackBerry difficult to use - it sometimes takes upwards of 10 minutes to negotiate a GPRS signal vs. the "always-on" Mobitex signal of prior models).

    Now besides the reception being awful for GPRS everywhere, I find the AT&T GSM network is somewhat dodgy at times when I travel: I found myself having to roam onto the VoiceStream network in NYC quite a bit. In Seattle, the AT&T network was barely reachable, and in San Francisco, same thing (Cingular's was reachable though).

    There were entire days in San Francisco this past June where I couldn't get *any* GSM signal from any network, AT&T OR Cingular, even when I did a network scan. I've heard similar complaints from other GSM users.

    So I'm not sure what the problem is... I know the BlackBerry 5810 isn't the best GSM phone, but I've heard of problems with 6710's and the new "blueberrys". I'm not sure about the Sony/Ericssons. Are all the recent models of GSM phones just crap? Or has the recent upsurge in GSM network investment created a bunch of technical problems?

    --
    -Stu
  109. 1am Monday, GAIT phone works great by mekkab · · Score: 1

    Using a GAIT phone (Nokia 6340i) I just powered it on, I get antennae bars (albeit with a noticeable lag after start up) and it receives calls like a charm. This is in the Washington D.C. metro area.

    (it better work! I just signed another 2 year contract on Wednesday!)

    Anyone else care to report?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:1am Monday, GAIT phone works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is only GSM, and your GAIT phone works on TDMA also - Man, I miss my 6340i!

  110. Who needs a phone when you have a ham radio by rustman · · Score: 1

    Wowbagger wrote: ``I can make all the personal calls I want on the local autopatches`

    Well, gosh, we don't all carry HTs (several times bigger than most cell phones) or have 2m/440 radios mounted under the dashboards in our cards.

    And you're not really unplugged when you have a ham radio with you, now, are you? :-)

    Rusty / n6gqi (who much prefers a cell phone to a crowded ham repeater)

  111. Another Pussy Heard From by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you think the tech should have been all reasonable and explained things real nice for the umpteenth time so as not to ruffle any feathers or give geeks a bad name? This geeks job is protecting a network which is probably the business and some dipshit who can't read policy or remember it or thinks that he, she, it is smarter than safety procedures, threatens to bring the whole house of cards down, leaving the geek the blame is not cause for some geek to get a little territorial. Fuck That! How many fucking retards an hour is this geek supposed to handle and still function in the job?

    I'm a Hired Gun Geek who gets called into totally out of whack situations where a weaker geek let people ride up his ass because he was reasonable. I check that the policy is sound and that everybody knows the policy and then start dragging dipshits through the door marked unemployed as a result of my Zero Tolerance, prefferably in front of their coworkers. Don't come back for your last check, we'll mail it to ya. I don't play union games and lawyers don't scare me. Insubordination is exactly that and I don't care if incurable stupidity was your major malfucktion. Fuck with me and your paycheck ends. Period.

    This is why I get paid the money and I don't take jobs unless I have full authority to bag dipshits and assholes. The next time you see a geek being a little extreme just remember he's trying to save his job and yours and protecting the network and all related resources is his job.

    This CEO did the right thing. Sounds like he has a good man and he knows it. What gives geeks a bad name are the Shit Talkers who can't hold up their end number one, followed by the weak tits.