Slashdot Mirror


Israeli Government Suspends Microsoft Contracts

MartinB writes "According to The Register, in a double blow to Redmond, the Israeli government has both suspended all government contracts with Microsoft until at least the end of 2004, and Israeli Antitrust Authority director general Dror Strum has ruled that Microsoft is subject to US court limitations. At issue in part is Microsoft's refusal to support Hebrew in Mac versions of Office."

597 comments

  1. it's official by flewp · · Score: 0, Informative

    That DOES make Israel the holy land. For linux advocates at least. Bah, I got nothing. But hey, FP?

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  2. Israel and Microsoft? Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, wait, the other thing: tedious.

  3. Wow by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 0

    Whats wrong with the world? Seems office on mac was meant for a dream at least in isreal coat of many colors that is!

    --

    --

    WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whats wrong with the world? Seems office on mac was meant for a dream at least in isreal coat of many colors that is!"

      Speak fucking english. Or are you a stinking arab terrorist. Blowing up Americans who are trying to help? Now that's what I call intelligent, level headed tactics.

    2. Re:Wow by StarmanDeluxe · · Score: 1

      I think he was referring to Joseph from the bible, and his many-hued coat. Why he was doing so, uh, I dunno.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you always been an asshole, or are you trying something new?

  4. Redmond will hardly notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...cuz the thieving Israelis pirate everything anyways

    They probably bought licenses for one seat of all of Microsoft's products and then loaded them on every government computer, not to mention all the copies the Israeli government workers took home and installed on their personal PCs

    1. Re:Redmond will hardly notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as well none of you Americans do this.

    2. Re:Redmond will hardly notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think more people from the Land of the "Free" rip off software, music, etc. Stats-wise, the good ol' US of A rip MS off more than most. Why would an Israeli buy MS Office in a foreign language? Now think about it, really. If they speak mainly Hebrew (although many speak two or more languages) they can chose not to buy MS Office (english) for Mac. And just because they don't buy MS Office, don't mean they gonna steal it. That's like a fish stealing a bicycle - he got no use for it. DuH! Think outside the square, there is life after MS products.

  5. or... by edson+at+lies.cl · · Score: 0

    m$ hates god

    --
    i have found, you can find,happiness in slavery!
    1. Re:or... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 4, Funny
      m$ hates god

      Of course. MS sees God as competition. ;)

    2. Re:or... by Troll_Kamikaze · · Score: 1

      MS sees God as competition.

      Nah, they don't reaaally. They just said that during the antitrust trial to minimize public perception of the true extent of their monopoly.

  6. Tunnels by SoSueMe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hope there are no tunnels at the Microsoft compound that could be used for smuggling.

    1. Re:Tunnels by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Well the microsoft staff better watch out the next time they have an outdoor bbq that it does not start looking like a refuge camp or Israeli may have to "defend itself".

    2. Re:Tunnels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope there are no tunnels at the Microsoft compound that could be used for smuggling.

      Or if there is any posibility of the Redmond Campus being mistaken for an Egyptian horse transporter.

  7. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are the Israelis going to build a wall around Microsoft's buildings?

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. Microsoft computers keep crashing in civilian areas, causing great damage.

  8. No Apple Support by Davak · · Score: 0

    Interesting story!

    I find it very interesting that apple doesn't support Hebrew support either.

    This must be too expensive and painful for these big guys to sink the money into it...

    Davak

    1. Re:No Apple Support by FooAtWFU · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, as the article says, there are people out there would would cover the costs of adding support for Microsoft. They're just being anticompetitive and attempting to herd people into buying Win Doze.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:No Apple Support by Delphiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple does support Hebrew. Microsoft does not support Hebrew in their Mac software.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    3. Re:No Apple Support by Davak · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're right. Sorry. You are right!

      Googling now it appears that Camino, Safari and Mozilla all support Hebrew...

      Thanks for the clarification.

      Davak

    4. Re:No Apple Support by Shipud · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Apple does support Hebrew, system level, and there are several good non-MS bi and tri- (Hebrew, Arabic & English) font products on the Mac. Trouble is, non of them are MS-Word compatible. Or rather, they try to be, but MS-Redmond & Tel-Aviv keep changing the rules. The Hebrew/English MS-Word is horrible (I spent quite a bit of time on it). Imagine the compounding bugs that crop up due to the requirement of cursor direction reversal, and added fonts and you get the idea. The Mac & the 3rd party products are a bit cumbersome, but by far less buggy

      --
      /sdrawkcab si gis siht
    5. Re:No Apple Support by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, which version of MacOS did Apple add hebrew support, and what was the last version of MacOS available when MS released the Mac version of Word?

    6. Re:No Apple Support by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      On the first point, not sure. On the second, MS released a new version of Office for Mac this summer, so that would've definitely been during the OS X 10.2 lifetime.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    7. Re:No Apple Support by questionlp · · Score: 1

      Office for Mac v.X has been out for a while... OS X 10.0.x or 10.1 timeframe I'd say. Microsoft refreshed the line-up to include native Exchange support for Entourage and added the Professional edition to include Virtual PC.

    8. Re:No Apple Support by Keeper · · Score: 1

      Does Office run in Virtual PC, or is it a native OSX application?

      If it's a native OSX application, does OSX have much in the way of bidi support?

    9. Re:No Apple Support by questionlp · · Score: 1

      Office for Mac v.X is an OS X native application and does not run on Mac OS 9. OS X does support Hebrew (and most likely Arabic) but Microsoft uses their own layout and rendering engine for Word and the rest of their Office suites and does not use the rendering engines provided by Apple. Others have already covered those two points.

      You can run Office for Windows under Virtual PC, but it will probably be fairly sluggish.

    10. Re:No Apple Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Uhm. The article pretty clearly states that some guys claimed that he had talked to people who according to him would pay for the port. Said people later declined to comment.


      Translation: This is a rumour.

      Dammit.

  9. Foolish on both sides by Farmer+Jimbo · · Score: 1

    Foolish of Israel to so publicly pick a fight with MS.

    Foolish of Microsoft to resist such an upgrade to their own software.

    1. Re:Foolish on both sides by cranos · · Score: 1

      Please explain how it is foolish for Israel to "pick a fight with MS"?

    2. Re:Foolish on both sides by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      You speak as if Microsoft is a government or country, and could wage war against Israel. Wow.

    3. Re:Foolish on both sides by Davak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree that Microsoft is bad etc, etc... however...

      It's sad when a country uses its laws to try to force a company to do certain things.

      If you don't give us Hebrew, we'll declare you a monopoly! Well, that's bullshit. Laws are laws... either Microsoft is a monopoly by their laws or not. It should have nothing to do with microsoft's decision not to have certain software packages in Hebrew.

      This really makes you wonder how Isreal looks at things...

      Davak

    4. Re:Foolish on both sides by Shipud · · Score: 1

      Monopolies are legal in Israel. But, if a company/corporation is declared as a monopoly, it is subject to harsher regulations, as power abuse has much harsher market consequences. Microsoft is a monopoly. The anti-trust laws are invoked due to an abuse of monopoly power, not by being a monopoly per-se

      --
      /sdrawkcab si gis siht
    5. Re:Foolish on both sides by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      What, you mean "work in our national language or we'll not let you have our business?"

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    6. Re:Foolish on both sides by Frostalicious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, that's bullshit. Laws are laws... either Microsoft is a monopoly by their laws or not.

      Well according to the article, a monopoly in Israel is...."any company with 50 per cent market share. Tying is illegal, as is unreasonably refusing a service. violations are considered criminal felonies".

      Do I need to convince you that Microsoft has 50% market share on the desktop? I hope not. So they are a monopoly, and thus have additional obligations under Israeli law, like not "unreasonably refusing a service". Therefore the country CAN "use its laws to try to force a company to do certain things". It can force them to provide the service.

      I'm not sure on the details of this, but by the article, it seems that Bill Gates is now a criminal in Israel.

    7. Re:Foolish on both sides by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Microsoft already were declared a monopoly in their country of origin.

      AFAIUI, Israel has been unimpressed with MS for some time. The fact that their software doesn't support Hebrew merely brought it to the Antitrust Authoritys attention, causing them to cry "Enough!"

      The last straw, if you like.

      There's plenty of other examples in industry of some two-bit outfit employing unethical (and often illegal) tactics to maintain their position in the marketplace.

      The difference is that most of them are smart enough not to attract attention to themselves. So nobody really cares.

      Had a Coke lately? Are those Nike shoes you're wearing?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    8. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Foolish of Israel to so publicly pick a fight with MS.

      Why do you call it "picking a fight" when a customer expresses reasonable concerns about legitimate issues like language support and single-supplier risk?

      Why would a customer expressing their needs and preferences be considered to be "foolishly picking a fight"?

    9. Re:Foolish on both sides by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      Microsoft is a monopoly

      Not for long if they keep this kind of crap up. They seem to be progressing quite well in the business of shooting themselves in the foot. First it was the occasional shot with the six-shooter. Then they went to a gatling gun. Now it's looking like they want to join the Nuclear Club.

      Kinda makes you wonder: If a wedding party in Serbia can down a small plane with stray shots, what might a behemoth like MS be able to do?

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    10. Re:Foolish on both sides by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Especially since Israel just announced an end to its policy of not assassinating people on American soil ;)

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    11. Re:Foolish on both sides by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      If you don't give us Hebrew, we'll declare you a monopoly!
      It was already declared a monopoly. There were no new laws written. It's just that since they refused to do MacOS X Office with proper BiDI (read: Hebrew) support, the citizens actually, *shudder*, had the government enforce the laws.

    12. Re:Foolish on both sides by DotNetGuru · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is a monopoly.

      Uhh, let's see. They're talking about how Mac OS X does what they want (bidi) and apparently enough people use it to complain that Office doesn't support this on OS X. They are also contemplating a switch to OpenOffice.

      Remind me, what product is it that Microsoft holds monopoly power for again? From this it certainly doesn't sound like it's operating systems or office productivity software.

    13. Re:Foolish on both sides by peacefinder · · Score: 1

      It's sad when a country uses its laws to try to force a company to do certain things.

      Like dealing honestly with shareholders? Using sound building materials and engineering practices? Promoting worker safety?

      All of these are areas of government law trying to force companies to do things that they would sometimes prefer to avoid. I don't find my particular examples to be sad at all; on the contrary, I am generally grateful for them.

      Not to say all such laws are good, of course. Many are not. But your statement of outrage is overly broad, and thus not especially effective. It's not the government power of regulation that is the problem; it's particular uses of it that may be foolish.

      If you don't give us Hebrew, we'll declare you a monopoly! Well, that's bullshit. Laws are laws... either Microsoft is a monopoly by their laws or not. It should have nothing to do with microsoft's decision not to have certain software packages in Hebrew.

      Presumably they have other reasons to think of Microsoft as a monopoly. Were it not for the Hebrew support issue, I suspect, they may not have had the political will to carry through with the antitrust action, even in the face of a flagrant violation. But given that the preservation of their culture and language is pretty much the reason for the modern state's existance in the first place, it's no surprise that they're willing to use whatever means is at hand to browbeat a company into supporting Hebrew.

      If Microsoft doesn't like it, they can fight it in Israeli court. If that's not worth it to Microsoft, they can choose to take their toys and go home. It's not like the revenue loss would kill them.

      That's the breaks when you go up against a sovereign nation that is as comfortable with the application of force and as fierce in matters of self-defense as Israel.

      This really makes you wonder how Isreal looks at things...

      This is the least of the issues that might make a person wonder about how Israel's government looks at things. C'mon, they bombed Syria a few days ago. This bit with Microsoft is trivial. If you want to wonder about Israel, try on a real issue for size: wonder why they're still expanding the settlements.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    14. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real issue was that the regulators were going to be sued for not finding and enforcing Monopoly and Antitrust measures, having a lame no action agreement that had lapsed - and they knew this was so. Many Shekels were at stake .
      They they stop bug fixes, browser upgrades, and language support, yet no competition sprang up to fill the gap.

      Israel is always right, and has a fair justice system:- demolition teams and bulldozers have been dispatched to Redmond HQ for a bit of collective extraterritorial lesson teaching.

    15. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats what happens when you give a primitive nation a suit and tie and just expect them to fit in

      im still suprised they can read

    16. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Summary of post-article discussion here.

      Any country disses micorsoft - Very Good.

      Israel disses micorsoft - Those damn jewbags, how dare they use laws to take any action against micorsoft. forget the fact that micorsoft REFUSES to make software work with the primary language of the country.

      Or, even more to the point - Israel is the racist zionist nazi apartheid oppressive colonial land-grabbing thieving evil satanic entity in existence. (oh, and 'terrorist' is an overused word nowadays to throw at the slightest dissenter). fuck the zionist state, anything they do is evil.

    17. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a book out by someone (a sociologist?) who showed that Israelis DO generally see things differently. He said there is a bit of post-holocaust hysteria (there is a sentiment that the terrorists want to wipe out all the Jews. AGAIN) as well as some other things which I can't remember.

    18. Re:Foolish on both sides by glenebob · · Score: 1

      I think we all know why MS is refusing to provide Hebrew support. Do you think they'd refuse if there was actual competition? Doubtful. Sounds a little like monopoly abuse to me. I would say Isreal is more justified in it's position than MS is in theirs.

    19. Re:Foolish on both sides by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      >>I'm not sure on the details of this, but by the article, it seems that Bill Gates is now a criminal in Israel.

      So, when do they send the Mossad after him?

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

    20. Re:Foolish on both sides by repetty · · Score: 1

      "If you don't give us Hebrew, we'll declare you a monopoly! Well, that's bullshit. Laws are laws..."

      You come off sounding naive. That's politics.

    21. Re:Foolish on both sides by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. Doesn't Microsoft own something like 50% of Apple stock? Correct me if I'm wrong - it was some time ago that I read about that buy-up, and I haven't heard anything about them dumping that stock.

    22. Re:Foolish on both sides by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

      It's sad when a country uses its laws to try to force a company to do certain things.

      What do you want a country to do with its laws, compose poetry?

    23. Re:Foolish on both sides by jocknerd · · Score: 1

      They purchased 10% or so of the stock in 1996 in an agreement with Apple. It was mainly to show the gov't that Microsoft had competition by keeping Apple in business. Apple has since paid them back their investment and is totally free of Microsoft.

    24. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when does Windows == Office?

    25. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Doesn't Microsoft own something like 50% of Apple stock? Correct me if I'm wrong

      You're so wrong you're like...retarded. Do you really think Microsoft has a controlling interesting in Apple?

    26. Re:Foolish on both sides by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
      Foolish of Israel to so publicly pick a fight with MS.

      I don't know. Maybe the IDF (Israeli Defense Force) can teach the folks in Redmond a thing or two about who they pick a fight with. Just ask some of the Arab countries around Israel whether they want to be on the receiving end of the IDF. The picture of the IDF taking apart Microsoftland with a few well placed tank rounds may be irrational but it sure is pleasant to imagine.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    27. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had a Coke lately? Are those Nike shoes you're wearing?

      No. No.

    28. Re:Foolish on both sides by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      I was unaware that Apple had repurchased their stock. However, the shares were always nonvoting, FWIW.

    29. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why would a customer expressing their needs and preferences be considered to be "foolishly picking a fight"?

      Good point. You only have to be afraid to express your dissatisfaction when talking to a dictator, a mob boss, or, apparently, Microsoft.

    30. Re:Foolish on both sides by luisdom · · Score: 1

      So they are a monopoly, and thus have additional obligations under Israeli law, like not "unreasonably refusing a service".

      That's something that many many people forgets. And it is one of the basis of capitalism as an efficient system: the society has to protect itself from monopolies because they are bad for the economic system: you loose the benefits competition. Even if it is a deserved monopoly. By that I mean that it was achieved by legal/moral means. Which is not the case.

    31. Re:Foolish on both sides by azimir · · Score: 1


      I'm not sure on the details of this, but by the article, it seems that Bill Gates is now a criminal in Israel.


      Shall we purchase him a nice, first class, one way ticket for his arraignment?
    32. Re:Foolish on both sides by jo42 · · Score: 1

      > Karma: Pornorific! (Mostly due to favorable comparisons to Ron Jeremy).

      Short. Fat. Hairy. Ugly.

    33. Re:Foolish on both sides by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      This really makes you wonder how Isreal looks at things...

      Slightly OT, but I have a good friend who is from Israel. He supports government-sponsored torture, saying "Well if we break a few fingers and end up saving the lives of 40 children, was it worth it? We know the guy has the info, and if we don't torture him our innocent citizens die."

      Tough to argue with that; they have to deal with much harder issues than we Americans generally have to (very few nightclubs explode here, unless Great White is playing). I stil haven't quite come over to his side, though -- what if you have the wrong guy? Then you're maiming someone for no good reason.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    34. Re:Foolish on both sides by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those aren't favorable ;-)

  10. More than just convenience by the+man+with+the+pla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am an Isreali citizen living in the United States. It's true that I as a professional do almost all of my work in English. But I am writing to say that being able to use my native hebrew means an awful lot to me and my family. It's not a matter of convenience, it touches on our religous and cultural beliefs. I am very glad to see the government take this action.

    --
    The linux hacker
    1. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't they do both?

    2. Re:More than just convenience by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      Absolutely uncalled for.

    3. Re:More than just convenience by twistedcubic · · Score: 4, Informative

      No disrespect, but you can get OpenOffice for free, which supports Hebrew, as people are saying. So if Microsoft gets cut off, your options are still the same-- use OpenOffice or another word processor that supports Hebrew. You should make the transition today, and tell everyone you know! :)

    4. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I suppose now Abe Foxman and the ADL will be playing violins and calling Microsoft "anti-Semitic" for not supporting Hebrew

    5. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the love of GOD, mod parent UP!

    6. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah if only you knew what REALLY goes on in israel. you ill-informed fox news zombie.

    7. Re:More than just convenience by DeltaSigma · · Score: 1

      I ditched television al-together. Fox News' "We report, you decide" hypocrisy was a large part of that.

    8. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, he's prolly Richard Perle or Paul Wolfowitz posting from his government workstation at US taxpayer expense

    9. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the idea -- computers should be an extension of yourself. For many people, being able to write in their native language (be it Hebrew, Urdu, Chinese, Sanskrit, Greek) is an accomplishment in itself. When a corporation such as Microsoft does something like this -- specifically not do something in order to keep its monopoly -- then it's tantamount to what the RIAA is doing by suing their customers. That is, the customers pay in order to preserve a monopoly.

    10. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cry me a river.

    11. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're aware that his people are the ones in the wrong in this situation, right? You see the parallels yet - Israel:Palestinians::Germany:Jews

    12. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I much prefer al-Together to al-Jazeera.

    13. Re:More than just convenience by linzeal · · Score: 1

      I have 0 sympathies with people that use a closed source product and than demand the company to support a feature for it after the fact. At least with any open source product you can pay someone to add whatever feature you want to it or do it yourself.

    14. Re:More than just convenience by BlueGecko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the one hand, I'm glad that packages such as OpenOffice are available, but you have got to realize that, if you really need to exchange a large number of Office documents, there is no real alternative except Office. I wish that weren't true, I try to minimize how much Office I use by using alternative products, and I wish OpenOffice the best of luck in the world and look forward to when I can use it in place of Office. However, for the moment, there are times--many of them--when I absolutely have no choice except to use Office, and the simple matter is that Microsoft has steadfastly refused not only to support Hebrew, but also Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese--really, any non-Latin language--in the Macintosh version of Word. That is wholly and entirely unacceptable, and I think that the Israeli government probably has a perfect valid point. Their reaction is perhaps a tad bit overkill, but I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment.

      Disclaimer: I am a US citizen whose native languages are American English and Southern and I am happy that way. :)

    15. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because they're too jewish.

    16. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In US Israel, Yasser Arafat kills your government! (and various innocent women, children, men, cats, dogs, etc...)

    17. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am an Isreali citizen living in the United States.

      Ahh. I think he repeats himself.

    18. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ignoring Godwin for the moment, I'd like to correct your assertion.

      Israel:Arabs::Czechoslovakia:Germans

      or, equivalently:

      Israel:Arabs::Poland:Germans

      Israel, Czechoslovakia, and Poland can all be described in these contexts as "that country we should have had control of after WWI that we'd like to make disappear, and we'll take it piece by piece if we can get it, since that will make the final objective easier."

      Hence all the Oslo-Munich comparisons, with Judea & Samaria (aka the West Bank) being comparable to the relatively mountainous, easily defensible Sudetenland, whose return to Germany by Chamberlain left Prague vulnerable to the eventual German invasion. For similar reasons, Syria wants the Golan back, though admittedly, it also has valuable water resources, and Israeli possession of the Golan leaves Damascus quite vulnerable.

      If, as you're hinting, the Israelis wanted to carry out genocide, they'd have done it long before. By all evidence, it's the Arabs who want to carry out genocide; they're giving it everything they've got, and the only thing preventing them from carrying it out is the lack of opportunity.

    19. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, you might consider using Microsoft Office for Windows. Or you might consider paying money for one of the products like the Hellel Word processor on the Mac that actually support hebrew.

    20. Re:More than just convenience by repetty · · Score: 2, Informative

      "No disrespect, but you can get OpenOffice for free, which supports Hebrew, as people are saying. So if Microsoft gets cut off, your options are still the same-- use OpenOffice or another word processor that supports Hebrew. You should make the transition today, and tell everyone you know! :)"

      Bad recommendation. As of today, you are asking this guy and all his Mac-using friends to DL and install Apple's X11 package and then DL and install OpenOffice.org's suite (which is a significant upgrade behind the x86 versions).

      Have you done this yourself? Do you understand what you are recommending that this guy, his family, and friends do?

      Do you think his daughter or father even know what X11 is?

      --Richard

    21. Re:More than just convenience by macemoneta · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting perspective. Playing devil's advocate, if the two packages are incompatible at some level, why is the problem on the OpenOffice side?

      It's not like MS Office is compatible with everyone except OpenOffice. And there is that whole convicted monopolist thing going against Microsoft, too.

      As Microsoft is the current market leader, shouldn't they be endeavoring to improve compatability with other software their customers use? MS Office doesn't run on every platform, so compatibility is a requirement, even if Microsoft considers Linux a competitor.

      If Microsoft makes a business decision, as they have, not to support Hebrew then they have taken themselves out of the sales competition in that market. Six million potential customers is a big chunk to give up.

      Of course, now those OpenOffice users will be requiring interoperability from their vendors...

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    22. Re:More than just convenience by stor · · Score: 1

      MMM, yes, its "the other side" that's wrong.

      While you guys keep killing each other over a bit of frickin dirt, most of the civilised world shakes it's head and wishes you would stop.

      And don't point out "but Israel did *this*" or "the Arabs did *this*"... that's exactly my point: you're "Fighting fire with fire" will never stop so long as you keep providing fuel.

      An eye for an eye will make the whole world blind. --Ghandi

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    23. Re:More than just convenience by repetty · · Score: 1

      >> >>I am an Isreali citizen living in the United States.

      >>Ahh. I think he repeats himself.

      I'm from Texas. I don't get what you're saying.

      --Richard

    24. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You DO know Texas is in the US don't you?

      Or, are you implying that because you're from Texas, you don't understand?

      Or, are you hinting that Texas is still technically it's own Republic?

      Or, do you simply not get what what he sarcastically implied?

      Or, are you defiantly ignoring what he sarcastically implied?

    25. Re:More than just convenience by Simonetta · · Score: 1


      Please allow me to ask one simple question without being flamed. This is simply an information request, not flame bait.

      Does OpenOffice run on Macintosh?

      Are major open source programs developed for Macintosh or generally only for Linux and sometimes Windows?

      Thank you,
      Simonetta

    26. Re:More than just convenience by Enucite · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a version available for Mac OS X
      http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_download s.html

    27. Re:More than just convenience by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      TextEdit should offer full support for MS Word files in Panther and it currently supports hebrew, maybe that will work for you?

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    28. Re:More than just convenience by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      It's not a matter of convenience, it touches on our religous and cultural beliefs.

      I thought that your religious beliefs mandated that Hebrew be kept sacred by minimizing its mundane usage. Isn't that why Yiddish is so popular?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    29. Re:More than just convenience by jfmiller · · Score: 1

      this is more of a personal interest, but I think it's relitive to the topic at hand.

      I'm learning hebrew in school, and I'm wondering what it takes to be able to type. Do you have a keyboard with the hebrew charicters on it or to you use a keyboard maping (aleph = a, bet = b, gimel=g) ? How (or do you) use vowle points? I guess the big question is could I resonably leard to type hebrew with my standard us keyboard?

      JFMILLER

      --
      Strive to make your client happy, not necessarly give them what they ask for
    30. Re:More than just convenience by jbolden · · Score: 1

      > Do you think his daughter or father even know what X11 is?

      No but probably about 1% of Microsoft users know what GDI and that doesn't stop them. The X11 install for apple is really easy you don't need to know what X11 is to do it.

    31. Re:More than just convenience by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1) Israel is intended as a Jewish state, not an Ashkenazic state. Knowledge of Yiddish was never as universal among Jews as was Hebrew. Sephardim and Mizrachim typically don't know Yiddish beyond cognate Hebrew and Aramaic loan words. Hence, Israel standardized on Hebrew. Granted, most of the early Zionists were in the habit of ignoring rabbinical opinion.

      2) Not all text editing is mundane. Prayer books and the like are typically printed, and someone has to write such things. Furthermore, Hebrew never completely died out as a language of biblical scholarship.

      3) Aramaic, Yiddish, Ladino: the major non-Hebrew vernacular languages used by Jews throughout history have traditionally been written from right to left and would necessitate the same bidirectional support that makes Hebrew so hard to support. It's only within the last hundred years or so that most Jews learned to read from left to right before learning to read from right to left.

      4) Any rejection of Hebrew as a mundane language is post-biblical, and there doesn't seem to have been an especially strong rabbinical consensus on the matter, even if some rabbis held that opinion. Even independent of biblical scholarship, there was plenty of secular Hebrew literature in the middle ages, long after Hebrew ceased to be a vernacular, and long before modern Zionism revived vernacular Hebrew.

      5) Yiddish was initially popular (at least among Askhenazim) because it was comprehensible (at least the spoken version) to the local gentile population. The vocabulary is mostly from Middle High German. Ladino is similarly derived from Spanish. Aramaic isn't an exclusively Jewish language at all, being originally a gentile vernacular (Syriac, an Aramaic dialect, still survives as a gentile vernacular in some villages), though it is used in some prayers, a few later parts of the Bible, and the Talmud, and it's still used in some rabbinical contexts. So non-Hebrew languages aren't necessarily embraced because they offer less sacred alternatives to Hebrew, nor are religious writings (even liturgy!) exclusively in Hebrew.

    32. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't get what you're saying.

      He's implying that Israel is part of the U.S.

    33. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is that basic integration stuff like the clipboard doesn't even work right with OpenOffice.

      That might be hunkydory with low-expectation Linux users, but most Mac types paid lots of money because they demand better.

    34. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, let's just leave you alone...you can stew in your own ignorance.

    35. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're an imbecile then. I can't write this out in crayon for you but I'll try to make it as simple as possible:

      Many companies promise features and functionality to their existing customers. It's called 'good business'. Many of these companies deliver, that's considered 'good business'. Some companies don't deliver...that's 'bad business'. The 'bad business' companies usually fail to get repeat business...that's the choice of the 'consumer' and exactly what we're seeing here. So, they may just be on the road you're talking about, but instead of applauding them you need to be a complete jackass. That's called being a 'dolt'. Oh yeah: it's 'then', sunshine.

    36. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're asking all the questions....maybe Mr. Texas stumped YOU.

    37. Re:More than just convenience by js7a · · Score: 1

      Why isn't OpenOffice working for you? OO-Writer reads and writes MS-Word documents, including advanced features like change tracking. I've been using it instead of Word for almost a year with no trouble. What's your problem with it?

    38. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i believe they never demanded microsoft include hebrew. they strongly requested it, and the request was ignored. What would you do if microsoft didn't support your primary language?

    39. Re:More than just convenience by BlueGecko · · Score: 1

      When I am the only one who will have to edit a document, I use Mellel, which is a superb word processor with excellent Hebrew and Arabic support, but when the goal is portability, Word becomes the only choice. There are and have been many word processors that can handle Hebrew on Mac OS X and other systems, but Word remains a stumbling block, because that's what most people use.

    40. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They demand a platform that doesn't have a functional word processor that is both compatible with the word processor's their contacts use, and supports Hebrew.

    41. Re:More than just convenience by sql*kitten · · Score: 1
      So if Microsoft gets cut off, your options are still the same-- use OpenOffice or another word processor that supports Hebrew.

      As Sun points out, there are differences between free and commercial office suites, namely the latter has the ability to incorporate non-free resources:
      • Spellchecker and thesaurus
      • Database component (Software AG Adabas D).
      • Select fonts including Windows metrically equivalent fonts and Asian language fonts
      • Select filters, including WordPerfect filters and Asian word processor filters
      • Integration of additional templates and extensive clipart gallery

      Sure you can get a free dictionary or thesaurus, but not one as comprehensive as you can buy, by a long shot. Same with fonts, import filters etc. These are things that matter to the typical Star Office/MS Office user.
    42. Re:More than just convenience by guybarr · · Score: 1


      Do you have a keyboard with the hebrew charicters on it or to you use a keyboard maping ?

      yes. standard in Israel, so if you know someone travelling to Israel just ask him to buy one or two for you. (Or perhaps check with the local jewish community )

      How (or do you) use vowle points?

      nikud (I forget the english word) isn't normally used by advanced hebrew speakers. But IIRC you can use it with lyx.

      For hebrew support of different sw search the

      for nikud support in lyx lookup the lyx site tips and tricks section.

      I don't know the QT situation, though.

      I guess the big question is could I resonably leard to type hebrew with my standard us keyboard?

      You can do everything, but I would recomend getting a hebrew keyboard. Keyboards are cheap.

      good luck.

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    43. Re:More than just convenience by guybarr · · Score: 1


      opps, sorry but preview doesn't work. it should be

      For hebrew support of different sw search the IGLU site.

      for nikus support lookup the lyx site tips and tricks section

      --
      Working for necessity's mother.
    44. Re:More than just convenience by RoLi · · Score: 1
      As of today, you are asking this guy and all his Mac-using friends to DL and install Apple's X11 package and then DL and install OpenOffice.org's suite (which is a significant upgrade behind the x86 versions).

      Wrong, there is a packaged MacOSX version that includes and installs X11 right along with OpenOffice. No extra download required, no extra installation required.

      Also MacOSX.3 aka Panther will include a X11 server, too.

      Do you think his daughter or father even know what X11 is?

      They don't have to.

    45. Re:More than just convenience by huckda · · Score: 1

      Well they gotta learn sometime!

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    46. Re:More than just convenience by eshefer · · Score: 1

      a few points:

      not all israeli's are jews (most are)
      Not all jews are religious (most are not)
      Not all religious jews are orthodox religious jews (most are not)
      Not all orthodox religious jews are ultra orthodox ashkenazi jews (most are not)

      Only the ultra orthodox ashkenazi jews (afaik) concider the hebrew language as a holy language that's only to be used for prayer.

    47. Re:More than just convenience by udif · · Score: 1

      >not all israeli's are jews (most are)
      >Not all jews are religious (most are not)
      >Not all religious jews are orthodox religious jews (most are not)

      First, In Israel, this is incorrect. There is a very little number of Reform and Conservative jews in Israel, defenitively less than 10% of all religious jews in Israel.

      Second, its an open question whether "orthodox religious jews" are a sub-group of "religious jews", or that "religious orthodox jews" are a sub-group of "orthodox jews".

      A large percentage of the jews in Israel, especially the non-Ashkenazi jews, consider themself "traditional jews", and consider themselves orthodox jews who are not religious. They may go to an Orthodox synagogue on Shabbat and religious holidays, some of them they keep Kosher dietary laws to some extent, some of them keep Shabbat to some extent, but generally they do not strictly obey the jewish laws as interpreted by the orthodox jews, yet they wouldn't even consider thinking about themselves as Reform or Conservative.

      >Not all orthodox religious jews are ultra orthodox >ashkenazi jews (most are not)

    48. Re:More than just convenience by Umrick · · Score: 1

      Actually, OO on OS X is pretty painless whether you know anything about X11 or not.

      As a second point... Right now, on my Mac Ti Powerbook, I'm running OOffice 1.1.0 which not a major revision behind as you claim. The Mac site still says it's 1.0.3, but all the mirrors have both the rc3 1.1 candidate, and 1.1.0 final.

    49. Re:More than just convenience by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      You may be right that OpenOffice can't read all Office documents, but given that Word on the Mac doesn't support Hebrew at all and thus cannot read _any_ Hebrew Office documents, OpenOffice has the advantage.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    50. Re:More than just convenience by mpe · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, I'm glad that packages such as OpenOffice are available, but you have got to realize that, if you really need to exchange a large number of Office documents, there is no real alternative except Office.

      Except if MS Office dosn't support the language you wish to write the document in the first place :)

    51. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the simple matter is that Microsoft has steadfastly refused not only to support Hebrew, but also Arabic, Hindi, Chinese, Japanese--really, any non-Latin language--in the Macintosh version of Word. That is wholly and entirely unacceptable, and I think that the Israeli government probably has a perfect valid point. Their reaction is perhaps a tad bit overkill, but I agree wholeheartedly with the sentiment.

      Considering this is the Israeli government, which is a government not known for its subtlty. Maybe Microsoft should be thankful that they havn't been bombed...

    52. Re:More than just convenience by CERonin · · Score: 1

      While I agree wholeheartedly with your Open Office sentiment, the grim reality is that the 2 Hojillion Pound gorilla will $!#7 where it wants to.

      I also agree that their stance vis-a-vis the Hebrew language is difficult to imagine. Has M$ grown so big that it can afford to overlook whole countries? I thought only the Pharma industry could do that. One can only hope that Israel will adopt Open Office and, as you say:

      those OpenOffice users will be requiring interoperability from their vendors...

      Oh, if only I could live to see that promised land!

      --
      stirring the pot since nineteen mumblty mumble...
    53. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Israel is intended as a Jewish state, not an Ashkenazic state.

      Zionism is virtually entirely the creation of Ashkenazi though. A people who have little, if any, connection to any of the peoples mentioned in the Torah.

      Knowledge of Yiddish was never as universal among Jews as was Hebrew. Sephardim and Mizrachim typically don't know Yiddish beyond cognate Hebrew and Aramaic loan words.

      Many Sephardic Jews are more likely to use Arabic. But it rather makes a nonsense of the "Arabs hate Jews" slogan to admit to the existance Jews who are also Arabs.

      Hence, Israel standardized on Hebrew. Granted, most of the early Zionists were in the habit of ignoring rabbinical opinion.

      There are plenty of rabbis who would say that this is still the case. Most obviously anti-Zionist rabbis.

    54. Re:More than just convenience by mpe · · Score: 1

      Many companies promise features and functionality to their existing customers. It's called 'good business'. Many of these companies deliver, that's considered 'good business'. Some companies don't deliver...that's 'bad business'. The 'bad business' companies usually fail to get repeat business...that's the choice of the 'consumer' and exactly what we're seeing here.

      This situation only really applies where there is a competitive market. When you have a monopoly the balance of power is toward the supplier.

    55. Re:More than just convenience by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Mac version of OpenOffice.org is significantly less developed than either the Linux or the MSWindles version. I keep hoping, but at the moment I feel I have more hope of getting my wife to start using Linux than to start using the Mac version of OpenOffice.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    56. Re:More than just convenience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If M$ does not support a language, the fact that OpenOffice compatability is not perfect is of no importance, as unfortunate M$ users can't read it anyway. Also, why is OO not good for a LARGE number of documents, surely it either works or not? In fact, it must be better if you have a large number of documents, compare the typical file sizes and you will see what I mean. OO uses a documented, standard format (zipped XML). Proprietary standards have caused nothing but problems, the way forward is to simply stop using them. I don't see why anyone ever HAS to use M$ Office, theer is ALWAYS an alternative, usually it works better. Word Perfect, for example, but maybe not on a MAC.

      The compatability of OO is very good, given the poor to non-existent documentation of M$ file formats, it is even useful in opening and re-saving Word files that have corrupted and can't be opened by Word. But if you really have to use a M$ product, which I doubt, why not save as RTF, the files may be smaller, certainly will be more compatible, and except in the obscure case of having an unpatched Acrobat Writer on the PC, will not harbour macro virii.

      Why continue to support a CONVICTED MONOPOLIST who continues to abuse the public with his shoddy products? Do yourself a favour, move on. Everyone else will, quite soon,why not be ahead for once?

      It is in everyone's interest to insist on using standards-compliant software, that way everyone benefits in the end. Standards like Unicode exist, and are well respected, so that those who need to use different character sets, or write from right to left, as their cultures have done for thousands of years, may continue to do so. It is only fair and reasonable to treat everyone on equal terms. M$ have not done so, they have in fact been RACIST. I believe that in some countries action could be taken on that basis.

      Why do we all not just switch to OpenOffice or Star Office, and end this vile monopoly? The choice is ours, Bill Gates cannot stop us. Please, no more excuses about convenience, it is not convenient to be encumbered by a vile monopoly when there are several easy and satisfactory alternatives. Consumers and end users, even IT Departments, seem collectively to be complete mugs, or maybe it is the herd instinct. We have allowed Bill to abuse us for far too long. It is our collective fault, time to realise this and break free of the monopolistic parasite. Israel have made a very good move here, will others have the guts to back their action instead of whingeing?

    57. Re:More than just convenience by randomencounter · · Score: 1

      Odd, if you want to interoperate with me using MSOffice would be a definite detriment.
      Of course, I'm not most people, I'm only me.

      --
      Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
  11. OpenOffice supports Hebrew by jkauzlar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just checked and it seems to be true, though there may be some issues with it.

    1. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOo isn't native on OSX. The development has been postponed indefinately (or 2004), I don't recall.

      Needless to say, OOo runs under OSX with X11, but then again, it looks and feels horrible. I'm an OOo advocate, but running it on OSX in the present time is not very smart.

    2. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Since the Mac version of MS Office is the one lacking Hebrew, this still leaves Israeli and/or Jewish Mac users up a creek.

    3. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ever heard of OS X on the Mac?

    4. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by agm · · Score: 1

      OpenOffice runs on the Mac, last time I looked.

    5. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Kufat · · Score: 1

      Open Office runs quite well under OS X. (With an X server such as OroborOSX.)

    6. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by boskone · · Score: 1

      what, both of them? Now I know that was a bit glib, but seriously, how can you require someone (MS) to not just write software for a competative platform, but also to require them to provide a specific language version for that specific product on a competing platform? this is like having your boss over your shoulder telling you what color of widget they want you to insert for a program that your coworker is supposed to be writing and will get most of the credit for. no, wait, that's not a great analogy, but it just seems like they are really pushing MS around.

      My solution:
      Switch to MS office for PC which supports hebrew according to their page.
      OR
      Keep using your chosen platform but use a different productivity app.
      OR
      Make user requests to have this feature added, but do you really think MS should be forced to include a money losing feature in their code? Aren't we all about freedom to code?

      sorry for the rant, I know it comes off as pro-MS, but it's not meant to be. It's meant to be pro-freedom of choice.

    7. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. X11 Only not native mac. It is more like running word in wine just doesn't look right or work right with other apps next to it.

    8. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "how can you require someone (MS) to not just write software for a competative platform, but also to require them to provide a specific language version for that specific product on a competing platform?"

      I don't know how they do it in Israel, but here in the states it's called the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

      "this is like having your boss over your shoulder telling you what color of widget they want you to insert for a program that your coworker is supposed to be writing and will get most of the credit for."

      No, it's like your prison guard telling you what rocks you have to break today. Things like this happen when you've been convicted of a crime (repeatedly, even).

      "but it just seems like they are really pushing MS around."

      Let the punishment fit the crime.

    9. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well Israel can also say "If you want us to buy your software, you must support Hebrew on the Mac and windows". If microsoft does not add hebrew support we take our shekels and go elsewhere. Very simple really. Anyone can make a choice like that, but when the goverment of a country with a buying power much larger than you or me does it they actually may pay attention.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    10. Re:OpenOffice supports Hebrew by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The punishment fitting the crime would be the government stealing MS's code, and offering it to user as it's own, and for free. Since that's what MS has done to more than one company.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  12. Not Microsoft's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft obviously doesn't care about adoption of the Macintosh in Israel, and that makes them a monopoly? WTF?

    1. Re:Not Microsoft's job by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      Well, if Microsoft is using their monopoly with Office to try and force people to stay on Windows, then they're arguably abusing the monopoly which everyone has long been aware that they've had.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:Not Microsoft's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they're talking about switching to OpenOffice, MS Office is by definition not a monopoly. Mono == 1

    3. Re:Not Microsoft's job by kfg · · Score: 1

      Microsoft and Israel made prior agreement that Microsoft's status in Israel would be determined by the outcome of the US case.

      Since they were found to be a monopoly in the US and guilty of illegal abuse of that power, then yes, they are, by definition, a monopoly in Israel.

      Making a product that only supports the native language in their own operating system but not doing so in versions of the same product for other operating systems is an abuse of monopoly powers under Israeli law.

      It's a pretty clear cut issue.

      OpenOffice has no such problems becasue a) they have not been found to be a monopoly b) had engaged in no specific agreement with the Israeli government as such and c) treat all versions for different operating systems equally.

      If Microsoft wishes to do business in Israel all they have to do is provide equal language support in their products. Please note that they've already taken the time and spent the money to make the translations.

      If they're too cheap, or too malicious as a monopoly, to comply, well, they can just take their business elsewhere.

      Just like every other business.

      KFG

  13. Fonts by BWJones · · Score: 1

    At issue in part is Microsoft's refusal to support Hebrew in Mac versions of Office.

    This is particularly important because the font handling in OS X is beautiful with native support of Hebrew making implementation issues for Microsoft trivial.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  14. Sure... by Heidistein · · Score: 1

    No hewbrew in MS-Office on Mac... So we "ban" Microsoft? Riiight! everyone would do this! (or at least should... :P)

    1. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a little more complicated than that. When certain groups are willing to pay for the cost of adding a language to an application (which already exists on the Windows version) and Microsoft flat out refuses, it kind of leaves an anticompetitive taste in my mouth.

    2. Re:Sure... by Heidistein · · Score: 1

      anticompetitive is all in the name "Microsoft" eh? ;-)

  15. Re:I like Jews by SoSueMe · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and we like j00Z too. oh, I get it... Nevermind.

  16. Gasp by Frogbert · · Score: 0

    Oi Veh!

  17. Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why won't Microsoft support 3% of 7% of the total desktop systems out there?

    1. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by bluekanoodle · · Score: 1

      Except that Apple's market share is more like 3-5% and what percentage of that share requires hebrew support? I'm guessing its one very small number.

    2. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Percentages are meaningless without a basis to refer to. Example:

      1 and 2 are small numbers, but 2 is 200% of 1
      10,000 is only 1% of 1,000,000

      To put it another way using your information: 5 out of 100 people use Mac (5%). If there are 6,000,000,000 people in the world, that leaves 300,000,000 people using Mac. Let's say that only 1% of Mac users need Hebrew support. That is 3,000,000 people.

      See where I'm going with this.
      Lies, damn lies, statistics and benchmarks.

    3. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      And yet amazingly, Apple itself supports Hebrew, as do numerous third-party developers of Mac software that aren't Microsoft (and have a small fraction of its resources). If they can all support Hebrew, why can't the larger, more resource-laden MS???

    4. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is not the point. The point is that the version of MS Office for MS Windows DOES support right to left. MS Does not want the Mac version to have this feature to force users to use MS Windows over Mac if they want right to left Hebrew in MS Office. So again, it is a monopoly doing what they do best.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    5. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by TummyX · · Score: 1

      So everyone in the world uses computers do they?

      Your ideas are right, but your numbers are meaningless. It could work out to be 1000 people or 100000000 people. Obviously if it was only 1000 people there isn't much commerical reason to support it.

    6. Re:Yeah, Hebrew in Mac Office makes sense. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      force users to use MS Windows over Mac if they want right to left Hebrew

      Quiet Pinky, I'm trying to plan for tonight.
      Why Brain, what do you want to do tonight?
      The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
      How are we going to do that Brain?
      I believe I have conceived my most brilliant plan to date! The first thing we need to do is gain control of the computers of everyone who wants right to left HEBREW!
      Eagad, Brain! Brilliant!
      NARF!!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  18. the amazing kreskin predicts by overbom · · Score: 1

    that arabic, hebrew, and urdu will be supported in mac office 'real soon now'.

    1. Re:the amazing kreskin predicts by SemiBarbaricPrincess · · Score: 1

      Arabic (and Korean) already are supported in MS Office:mac. Which kind of rules out the it's-got-not-roman-characters excuse for MS.

      --
      Those who would live more than one life must die more than one death.
    2. Re:the amazing kreskin predicts by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Arabic is not supported in Mac Office. Korean is, as are the other East Asian languages.

    3. Re:the amazing kreskin predicts by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      And Linux gkb support for Korean is... well, non-existent?

      I hate the fact that I cannot switch to the Korean IME if I boot Linux with English as default. I have to shutdown X and reboot it to get access to the Korean keyboard. And it pisses me off because writing in English from the Korean keyboard will not suffice because I have to type in Portuguese and French as well.

  19. OpenOffice by Davak · · Score: 1

    Ministry is said to be examining OpenOffice as an alternative.

    And all the open sourcers rejoice!

    Davak

  20. What about Unicode? by BanjoBob · · Score: 1

    Both Windoze and the Mac support Unicode fonts so I would assume (maybe wrong on this one :) that the Unicode font sets would work in both worlds -- Mac Unicode on the Macs and Windoze unicode on Windoze and Linux Unicode on Linux ...

    Office supports Unicode so, how is it that the Mac using Office can't run multi-national font sets and thus Hebrew, Cyrillic, Chinese, etc.

    --
    Banjo - The more I know about Windoze, the more I love *nix
    1. Re:What about Unicode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hebrew is written in the opposite direction from English so it's more than just about the fonts, ok.

    2. Re:What about Unicode? by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the problem with all of these languages is proper right-to-left text support.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    3. Re:What about Unicode? by Biff+Stu · · Score: 1

      Even though Unicode is supported in OS X, Word for OS X uses the old carbon libraries and has no support for Unicode. This has been driving me batty.

      I do quite a bit of technical work and I need Greek fonts for mathematics, etc. Of course, I can still use Symbol, but there are problems sharing documints with Windows users. Many people on the Windows side don't have Symbol installed, and when I get a document made on a Windows box and uses Greek Unicode it doesn't translate correctly.

      The big problem is that MS has no desire to generate a Cocoa version of Mac Office anytime soon. If they would include Unicode support, all of the cross platform font problems would go away. The sky would be bluer, grass would be greener, and life would be good.

    4. Re:What about Unicode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to suck a dick, ok.

    5. Re:What about Unicode? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Arabic support already exists, so just adding a new set of fonts should be pretty trivial. Or am I missing something?

  21. C'mon Bill by nate+nice · · Score: 0, Troll

    Time to strap some explosives onto your body, run into the Israeli public and blow yourself up until you get the contracts you want. I bet you could strap a lot onto Steve Balmer!

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:C'mon Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange you should say that, because Ballmer is actually Jewish.

    2. Re:C'mon Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anthor infestation at the top eh.

    3. Re:C'mon Bill by silversky · · Score: 0

      Mod the guy up! It is funny!

    4. Re:C'mon Bill by glenebob · · Score: 1

      Balmer would dance across the stage with all those explosives strapped on and detonate right as he passes the podium. DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS DEVELOPERS *BOOM*

      It wouldn't be safe. Funny as hell, but very unsafe.

  22. Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by joelparker · · Score: 1
    How hard is it to add Hebrew to software?

    I thought software internationalization
    took some real time to set up initially,
    then was easy for each additional language.

    What are the technical issues involved?

    Thanks, Joel

    1. Re:Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by Delphiki · · Score: 1

      The main difficulty is that it's a right to left language instead of left to right like english. So editors, i.e. Word, need to be reprogrammed so that as you type the cursor moves to the left, instead of to the right.

      --

      Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

    2. Re:Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      Hebrew is right to left so it isnt as easy as you think. Its only easy for languages that are left to right as I understand it.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    3. Re:Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by jrumney · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hebrew and Arabic are written right to left, except for numbers and snippets of other languages, which are written left to right within the right to left text. This requires Bi-Driectional (BIDI) text support, and is very hard to support correctly and efficiently for read-write programs where the user can just put their cursor anywhere and start typing. Most software either does BIDI correctly or does something resembling it efficiently, seldom both.

    4. Re:Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by laird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can either use the operating system's built in text layout widget, which supports all of this correctly with no work, but doesn't give you any control over what's going on, or you can code your own layout engine, giving you complete control, but you'd have to add support for everything yourself. Given the control you'd need for a real word processor, I am sure that MS coded their own layout engine, so it'd be an immense amount of work to add support for bi-directional languages, etc. If MS supports any right-to-left languages already (Arabic, etc.) it shouldn't be any work at all to add support for Hebrew.

    5. Re:Software internationalization - is Hebrew hard? by spitzak · · Score: 1

      It's really hard if your program only supports English.

      However if your program already supports multiple languages, including several others that are right-to-left, and the other version of the program for Windows already supports this language, it is very easy. This is the source of the complaint.

  23. Never a problem by tcd004 · · Score: 1

    on Jesus's palm pilot

    tcd004

  24. Gates bitch slapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel to Gates: Kush mir in tuches!

  25. Why oh why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the Jews feel like they are entitled to everything?

    1. Re:Why oh why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey,

      Fuck you, you fucking cunt.

      Hugs

      me

    2. Re:Why oh why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck me?...Fuck me?!...No, FUCK YOU you fucking piece of shit, inbreed bleeding cunt from a dirty whore. Yeah YOU, you fucking CUNT!!! Eat my shit and suck on the peanuts stuck in it, douche bag breath. And while you're at it, get my cock out of your ass and put it back in your mouth, you FUCKING CUNT!!!

  26. The Goatse.cx lawyer suspends Linux Contracts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because linux's support for goatse is shit

    1. Re:The Goatse.cx lawyer suspends Linux Contracts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bs, everyone knows linux has gaping holes.

  27. Deuteronimicus 13:37 by Chagatai · · Score: 3, Funny
    "And yea, the Lord spake unto the Israelites saying unto them, 'Lo, go forth and build unto me a nation worthy of praise and power. Build thy nation upon the backbones of small bird that are black and white, that stay where the cold winds blow. And when thine enemy arrives in the night, thou shalt see him wearing portholes like unto windows, bearing wares which thou shalt not take, for I have set the aside to be a land free of gates and minions who roam everywhere in thy houses.' And the Israelites did so, smiting the foes who doth galavant in the street like large apes with too much wine, shouting that their ways are superior. And so it was good, for they did not bow down before the false idols of the Mik-roh-softi."

    Amen.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Deuteronimicus 13:37 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      looks like you put a lot of work into this, and it still wasn't funy.

  28. First signs of a dying company by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Typically, customers revolting against your software is the first sign that things, as they say, "ain't right(tm)". Sometimes, these are the precursors to the death of a company. Unfortunately, MS is so large, the normal rules go right out the window.

    But if they finally are dying ( which I doubt ), we're in for a hell of a nasty ride.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  29. How is MS a monopoly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're talking about evaluating OpenOffice as an alterntive, that means MS is not a monopoly. Man, people are stupid.

  30. Not too ironically... by mishehu · · Score: 1

    That (at least at a glance) Open Office seems to have really stepped up the multi-language support... including Hebrew. Next we'll barricade Microsoft's Israel headquarters and make Bill Gates spend a romantic evening with Yasser Arafat...

  31. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews are born evil. Everyone knows this.
    They control the media.

  32. OO Star Office have Hebrew? by synonymous · · Score: 1

    Could be an easy problem solver there if Star or Open Office has it. Does it?

    1. Re:OO Star Office have Hebrew? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is patent the method StarOffic euses so then M$ has to pay US!!!

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:OO Star Office have Hebrew? by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Star (of David) Office?

  33. Messy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a messy subject. Localization decisions are made to open up new markets. For a company to make a decision to localize they have to justify the cost with the new market share. The problem with languages like Catalan (Spanish variant) Nynorsk (Norwegian variant) and Hebrew is that the populations that speak them are almost all fluent in another language that the products are already localized to. There are a few people that are monolingual to these languages but they are generally not the kind of people that use computers.

    On the flip side these kinds of languages often carry some sort of cultural significance. The decision not to support looks like a snide towards the culture.

  34. Because they are CHOSEN BY GOD! Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chosen ones have a DIVINE RIGHT to have all office apps support their backwards language!

    1. Re:Because they are CHOSEN BY GOD! Duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL, yeah. They just don't want to admit they are deprecated I guess.

  35. The real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    They were pretty happy that MS products didn't work on the sabbath. What really got them mad was that they didn't work any other day either.

    1. Re:The real reason by phrogeeb · · Score: 1

      I'm truly disgusted by some of the things people have said on this board. (See Alpha Nerd - "STFU STUPID JEW" and other various supporters of anti-semitism).

      But that was some funny shit. =)

      --

      ------

      "Will the highways on the Internet become more few?" --George W. Bush, in Jan. 2000

    2. Re:The real reason by mpe · · Score: 1

      They were pretty happy that MS products didn't work on the sabbath.

      It would actually be quite complex to get a computer program to stop working on the sabbath. Since it would need to know the exact time of sunset.

  36. Corroboration would be nice. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    This story showed up on The Register a couple of days ago and then Newsforge cited The Reg article after that. But, as yet I have not seen anyone else report it or corroborate the story. It would be really great if some "News" site were to investigate the validity of this story.

    1. Re:Corroboration would be nice. by l2718 · · Score: 1

      Ha'aretz (the best Israeli newpaper) carried this story yesterday:

      "Treasury suspends Microsoft renewal".

  37. entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are they entitled to get software from elsewhere? Well, they are YOUR overlords, not Israels.

  38. Not Quite by ovanklot · · Score: 1

    The Israeli govenment said it temporarily suspended contracts with Microsoft because they cost too much and the economic conditions are not grand. Examining Open Source as an alternative has been going on for quite some time.
    As far as the spokesmen for the different government offices go, it's going to be a short while before Israel renews the contracts.

    --
    "Programming is life, the rest is mere details"
  39. Thank you Israel by El · · Score: 1

    ... for fighting for Urdu and Arabic language support in Microsoft Office! I wonder if native Arabic speakers appreciate this...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Thank you Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not as much as they'd appreciate a plane flying into the Microsoft compound...

    2. Re:Thank you Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey ElBaradei,

      Stick to checking out the nuclear weapons in Iran and quit pooping stupid comments here.

      Thank you,

      George W Bush

    3. Re:Thank you Israel by rocketfairy · · Score: 1

      Wait, Arabs and Pakistanis are supposed to appreciate Microsoft? Just because they write rtl doesn't make them stupid, dude.

    4. Re:Thank you Israel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure Israel could handle that.

    5. Re:Thank you Israel by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know that Israel thinks much about Urdu, but Arabic is an offical language of the state of Israel, at least in Jerusalem road signs are in Hebrew, Arabic and English. Also it should be noted a lot of Israeli Jews (Including our president!) were born in countries that speak Arabic or Farsi. And they may have a need to write these languages from time to time. Also we do have a large arab minority who are citizens of Israel and may wish to be able to use a computer.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
  40. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Sh0t · · Score: 1

    I see plenty of coverage about Palestinians dying from Israeli attacks.

    Please PLEASE don't go there with that "The news media only shows israeli's pain!" type rhetoric.

    Everbody tries to say the media only shows the opposing side. I see both sides, especially if it's scandal. If I can see it, how come you(and your ilk) cannot?

    So please drop that crap.

  41. Use Mellel in place of [Ricidulous]Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mellel : $25 shareware word processing in OS X 10.*. Superfast, ultrastable, damn slick -- sort of what Word used to be in its 5.0 version : just the important things, without any of the bloatware. I've used it for a year now, and it's wonderful. They've just integrated bibliography handling, and their footnote handling is excellent and more useful than Word's.

    Most importantly, however, it handles Hebrew like a dream (it was written by two Israeli programmers), as well as a huge number of other languages with different requirements -- such as Arabic and Persian. I find Mellel "just works" in the way Mac OS X does.

    Check it out. I'm gushing because Mellel is one of the few bits of "real" Shareware that I use every day for something important, and it does the job amazingly well.

    Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Israeli government told MS where to stick it and bought in bulk from RedleX?

  42. Here's a good one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone actually like the Jews besides the Jews? Are they more hated than America? How about an American Jew? Are they the worst? They seem to be trouble makers, worse than the Muslims in their claim to resources and proclamations of being Gods chosen folk, etc. Oh well, they will keep being blown up as they act this way.

  43. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bodycount matters? The number of people who died decides right and wrong? Maybe you should question your Poli Sci 1 professor a little more than it sounds like you do.

  44. The jews are just mad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jews are just mad that Microsoft is the last big American corporation not run by jews.

    1. Re:The jews are just mad by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Steve Ballmer is a Jew.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  45. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, if you are on the political left of the spectrum, they are not "suicide bombers" they are "freedom fighters."

    I always wondered why the Left likes to call those on the Right "Nazis." It seems to me that the Left are the ones that would be happy if the Jews were exterminated.

  46. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hypocrites!

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the real issue is, where can I get the Kingonese localization for OS X. :)

  47. hmmm... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    Ya think Ballmer will be flying to Israel in First Class, or Business Class? Or maybe they bought an old SR-71 to get out to these upstart countries _Real Soon Now_? :)

  48. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember if you are on the political right of this argument it is "homicide bombers" not "suicide bombers"

  49. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by big-giant-head · · Score: 1

    Sh*t head liberals believe in freedom of expression, but only for those people that express the same thoughts as they do.......

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.
  50. Oh yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arabs get real excited about Urdu word processors.

    wtf?

  51. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 1, Insightful
    That would be a reasonable analogy, if it weren't for the fact that you were the aggressor in this conflict, continually stealing their land, destroying their homes, killing their people.

    Way back before you were born, Egypt and everybody tried to wipe Isreal off the map, they stood up, and kicked ass, and ever since then it's been a pride issue on both sides. AFAICT you have the arabs on one side who won't be happy till Isreal is flat gone, and Jews who at worst are pretty damn callous -- but that's called the right of survival.

    The hugest irony to me is that both have right-to-left script, both have similar glyph structures, hell both *LOOK* kind of the same. You can tell Jews and Arabs share common genetic history. It reminds me of those two races in the Dark Crystal.

    All the college students bitching about the Jews really need to watch out. Western Europeans have a dangerous pogrom tradition that goes back 1000 years. It's a serious case of glass houses.

  52. Little do people know, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the wall around the Gaza Strip and West Bank is actually there to protect the terrorists^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Palestinians from one George W Bush and his war on Islam^H^H^H^H^H terrorism.

  53. no, it's just you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monopolies do not have to be absolute in order to be a monopoly.

    Slavery is also illegal, even though the slave could run away. The Master is not in absolute control of the slave either. Imagine the shock and awe when we were able to identify the phenomenon of slaver at all!

  54. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of the most informative posts I've seen on slashdot in awhile. A succinct, if not simplified, HOWEVER CORRECT assessment of the mide-east mess.

  55. No compile Loc? by soft_guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Under MacOS X, you can *sometimes* do a no-compile Localization, even if you are not the original developer.

    I *know* that Office for Mac isn't exactly a well-behaved "normal" Mac app - heck, it isn't even a normal *Carbon* app. I did work at Microsoft as a Mac developer, so I am somewhat familar with the architecture of Office.

    My suggestion is that they could look at the possibility of doing a no compile loc themselves, if they have Arabic support (very ironic!).

    Both Arabic and Hebrew are hard to support because both require bidirectional (BiDi) text support. Meaning that text is layed out both left to right and right to left.

    If your supporting international, French, Spanish are the easiest because you're still dealing with Roman character sets and one direction of layout. You just have to make sure you read the strings in from a resource someplace. Next hardest is Cyrilic languages like Greek or Russian. Next hardest is languages like Japanese where you need to have double byte characters or Unicode. The hardest is Arabic and Hebrew because of BiDi. People may often choose to do an Arabic version and not Hebrew because the market for Arabic is larger.

    However, if you've put in BiDi support already and you're already internationalized, getting Hebrew to work shouldn't be insanely hard and could possibly be done by a third party, though there would probably be some bugs they couldn't fix (although they could report these back the MacBU and maybe work something out.)

    Or they could use heavy handed "the customer is always right" tactics. Either way...

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:No compile Loc? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Next hardest is Cyrilic languages like Greek or Russian.

      Greek is not a Cyrillic language - they use the Greek alphabet. I assume here you'd also place the other languages that can be handled with a single byte code page.

      Next hardest is languages like Japanese where you need to have double byte characters or Unicode.

      You don't exactly have the ability not to handle Unicode anymore, if only because there's daggers and quotes and dashes in Unicode needed for proper English writing. In a lot of ways, proper Chinese support is easier then proper English support, as characters are one width (unless you toss Roman characters in, which are usually half the normal width) and line wrapping that ignores words; no justification or word wrapping to worry about.

      The hardest is Arabic and Hebrew because of BiDi.

      I think Bidi processing is easier then the character shaping necessary for Hindi and other Indic languages.

    2. Re:No compile Loc? by YE · · Score: 1

      Next hardest is Cyrilic languages like Greek or Russian

      Ooops, you were a Mac developer at Microsoft? I hope their Windows developers know that Greek is NOT Cyrillic. It's Greek.

  56. does OpenOffice support Hebrew and Arabic? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I know KDE (and its related tools) support both Hebrew and Arabic, but does OpenOffice do it as well? If not, what are the alternatives?

    Slightly off-topic: I've recently tried OpenOffice the latest version and was very impressed how well it converted PowerPoint presentation. I really *hate* when some scientific presentations use PPT format (and give no other alternatives). It doesn't happen that often, but unfortunately it *does* happen. I wish scientific community were a bit more aware of the 'open vs closed standards' issue.

    1. Re:does OpenOffice support Hebrew and Arabic? by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, OO-PPT conversion seems to be pretty transparent; I actually originally downloaded OO primarily because I needed to be able to view Powerpoint slides, and since then I've been using it to view .ppt files created in Powerpoint (and create files to be run under powerpoint) with no trouble.

      I used to hate it when files were only available in .ppt also, but lately I've come to appreciate that it's often easier to do things that way than any other. And thanx to OO we don't have to blow all that money on MSOffice :-)

  57. hah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid jews. Figures they'd do something like that.

  58. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three times as many Palestinians have died as have Israelis, but nobody in the mainstream media seems to want to report that fact, expect maybe AFP.

    Of course there have been more Palestinian casualties. When they keep BLOWING THEMSELVES UP, what do you expect??

  59. Have you ever managed a software project? by kylef · · Score: 1
    Foolish of Microsoft to resist such an upgrade to their own software.

    Feature management is a very, very simple concept. You look at what percent of your customers are demanding this or that feature, and what bugs are affecting X percentage of your customers, and make your decisions about how to allocate development resources from there.

    With Apple having a sub 5% market share worldwide, MS Office being on perhaps half of those, and perhaps less than 1% of the worldwide Apples requesting Hebrew support, we're talking about a very small customer base here requesting this feature. Especially if there is a bug fix that is affecting 90% of your customers that hasn't been addressed yet.

    If this article is true, the Israeli government seems to be strong-arming Microsoft to implement a feature that doesn't make economic sense. What's worse, according to the article, they are suspending MS contracts that have already been signed. I am no contract lawyer, but to me, that sounds very abusive and arbitrary, and would be illegal if anyone but the government were to attempt such an action...

    1. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by Shipud · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...the CEO of Apple's Israeli representative Yeda offered to underwrite the localization work, pay 1million shekels, and assure a pre-order of 2,000 copies from Apple France - but Microsoft Israel declined.

      So Yeda offered to take the job upon themsleves. MS does not have to pay anything to add Hebrew. Why does MS still refuse? Could it be they like their Windows platform better than Mac-OS?

      --
      /sdrawkcab si gis siht
    2. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      If this article is true, the Israeli government seems to be strong-arming Microsoft to implement a feature that doesn't make economic sense.

      Not adding Hebrew language support in a product available in Isreal is what isn't making strong economic sense I think.

      I don't have the stats but I'm betting the percentage of Isrealis using a Mac versus Isrealis using a PC is appreciably higher than it is in Northwest USA!

      Whatever, Microsoft fucked up again and now they're paying the price, which I've noticed them doing more and more these days.

    3. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am glad you are not a contract lawyer, becuase you would be on the street. If a product doesn't have a feature that you want you use another product. At least that is what I and many other rational people do. Simply not buying a product can not be thought of as "strong arming".

      Isreal is not doing anything illegal, from what we can tell from the article, in US law or international law, no contract has been broken, as near as we can tell (yes I am stressing the "near as we can tell"). I do not know what is meant by suspending thier contract, it could simply mean that they are not excerzing their option to buy more MS products. But you could rest assured that if anyone (including a goverment) where to wrong MS on a contract that MS would take that party to court in a jiffy.

      acs_inc

    4. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by mad.frog · · Score: 1
      If this article is true, the Israeli government seems to be strong-arming Microsoft to implement a feature that doesn't make economic sense.


      May not make economic sense for MSFT, but it surely makes economic sense for Israel. They need software that works in Hebrew, and MSFT isn't providing it.

    5. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by kylef · · Score: 1
      So Yeda offered to take the job upon themsleves. MS does not have to pay anything to add Hebrew. Why does MS still refuse? Could it be they like their Windows platform better than Mac-OS?

      Could it be that they don't want to allow 3rd party developers to modify their code and release something with the Microsoft logo on it?

      Let me turn around the situation for you: Do you think Apple would allow 3rd party developers to add some features to OS X that a foreign government was requesting, and release that product with full Apple support? I think not.

    6. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by kylef · · Score: 1
      Not adding Hebrew language support in a product available in Isreal is what isn't making strong economic sense I think.

      Office Mac has always been available in Israel. Office Mac has never had support for Hebrew. People know this, and buy it anyway: it's their choice. At what point exactly did native language support for a country become a necessity to sell a product there?

    7. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by superyooser · · Score: 1
      With Apple having a sub 5% market share worldwide, MS Office being on perhaps half of those, and perhaps less than 1% of the worldwide Apples requesting Hebrew support, we're talking about a very small customer base here requesting this feature.

      True, but the article pointed out that IE:mac and Outlook Express:mac support Zulu. (It didn't say specifically about Office.) How many Zulu Mac users do you think exist in the world? And Zulu Mac-heads who want MS applications? Most of Israel's economy is high tech. The population is extremely educated and wired (per capita compared to other countries). And umm let's put it this way: High tech companies aren't outsourcing jobs to the Congo. There is no Microsoft Zimbabwe (although they might have a branch in South Africa, but Zulu is one of many languages there).

    8. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by thrillseeker · · Score: 1
      At what point exactly did native language support for a country become a necessity to sell a product there?

      At the point the government of the country said it was (it is their country, and not m$ft's...)

    9. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      True, but the article pointed out that IE:mac and Outlook Express:mac support Zulu.

      Give a few bucks and I can get any Unix system you want completely working on Zulu. That's because supporting Zulu is easy; all even full support requires is a translation team and maybe a keyboard layout. However, Hebrew requires its own fonts, and bidirection code and spelling code that ignores optional vowels.

      If you look at KDE, Xhosa and Venda, two languages of South Africa, are well supported, but Hindi, one of the world's six largest languages, isn't supported. It has little to do with politics; it's all about how easy they are to support.

    10. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by tftp · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is done frequently in software business, regardless of who asks for it. You can not do everything; you can not write TCP or Bluetooth or WAP stacks, you can not write your own routing implementation, you can not do many things. What you can do is your "core competency" - something that you do better than anyone else. You buy the rest, and include these 3rd party components into your product. Look at a splash screen of any software, and you will see how many 3rd party copyrights are mentioned there - because the vendor used their IP. And once you do that, you fully support the resulting product (though the components' vendors will support you, in turn.)

    11. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by Erik+Piper · · Score: 1

      I can vouch for this. On the other hand, with a very large company the "core competency" can be very broad without making that competency shallower -- in other words, a company like Microsoft could (if it really wanted to) be an expert in operating systems (huge in itself) and office software, including all the nooks and crannies involved.

      Whereas my employers have trouble even adding CD burning without 3rd-party libraries. :0)

    12. Re:Have you ever managed a software project? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      If you had read the article for comprehension, you would have noticed that this is not the Israeli government saying that Microsoft isn't allowed to sell software in Israel. This is the Israeli government saying they are not going to buy any MS software themselves. There is a big difference.

      Further, this isn't a case where Microsoft isn't supporting Hebrew at all. This only affects the Mac version of Office. So one might make the argument that by not supporting Hebrew on Mac, Microsoft is attempting to "force" Israeli users to buy Microsoft Windows and native Office applications.

      Personally I think any government in the habit of buying operating systems and software should be avoiding Microsoft anyway... so I can support this move from Israel (which is rare for me). Unfortunately it doesn't sound like they'll be looking to move to GNU/Linux solutions as a wholesale replacement. Which is too bad. This is a prime example of why Free Software exists: to offer users freedom. In cases like this, where the users are even willing to pay to have the changes made, the unilateral control of software by a single firm is harmful to the users well-being. And in this case, looking for basic office functionality... well, let's just say there are probably any number of acceptable solutions already available as Free Software.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  60. Re:China by nek · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Where the hell do these racist idiots come from? I thought we were all fairly intelligent here, not brain-damaged rednecks. Sand-niggers? Watch some other news channel besides Fox, moron.

  61. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews is okay, but I hate Zionist, they also should be exterminated.

  62. Now thinking about it.... by darth_silliarse · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates should be able to aquire a nuclear arsenal considering the amount of pirated material available in the ex-Eastern Bloc, just file a few lawsuits at the respective governments and et voila! an ICBM or ten, he could then relocate his Redmond base to Syria and we could have the first ever government vs corporation cold war! Think of the possibilities! Think of the outcome! der der der der der der der "Now on News at Ten, the Israeli Prime Minister has declared on state television that he will release a virus-patch that will render all Windows OS's inoperable until hebrew is installed as the default language der der der der der.... he also added that Steve Jobs and Linus Torvalds would be joining Mossad as counter agents".

    This may or may not be a sarcastic post...

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
  63. Off Topic Joke by niko9 · · Score: 1

    There is an ambulance service here in NYC called Hatzhola EMS. They cater to the jewsih community, are mostly volunteer, and respond to calls from work or school, usually in whatever attire they happen to be in at the time.

    One day I was working with an old timer, and he started to sing a tune as we watched one the Hatzhola guys race past us:

    Oy vey!
    Outta the way!
    The Matzah box is on the way!
    (mimicks siren)
    Heeebreeew Hebreeeew!

    He meant no harm buy it, he actually has a few friends in that particular service, but I almost pooped in my pants when I heard it.
    --

    1. Re:Off Topic Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was a white people ambulance service, you know the NAACP would be freaking out. It doesn't matter if it's privately funded, just look at the Augusta Golf Club.

    2. Re:Off Topic Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's ok for minorities or groups who claim to be oppressed or where oppressed at some point in their past, though they're in charge now, that doesn't matter. Everyone gets to be a victom now.
      As such, I think I'll claim the bahamas as anonymousland and get the UN to shove everyone already there into the sea. As well, anyone who posts anything against anonymous posting are anti-anonites. Oh, and anonymous posters are the chosen posters and everyone else are cattle to be used as we see fit as explained in our book the talnonymous.

  64. Partly by Llywelyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, you're mostly right.

    Implementing internationalization for hebrew is trivial in Cocoa-based apps. It is significantly more difficult for Carbon based apps (which MS Office likely is). Microsoft also has a *serious* NIH syndrome when it comes to anything Apple-based and seems to prefer to implement their own versions of everything rather than use Apple's built-in libraries, so even if they could use Apple's internationalization (which I should add is absolutely gorgeous for Hebrew), I have a sneaking suspicion they would want to implement and use their own.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    1. Re:Partly by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      Microsoft also has a *serious* NIH syndrome when it comes to anything Apple-based and seems to prefer to implement their own versions of everything rather than use Apple's built-in libraries

      You'd better believe it! Anyone remember Office 6 for Mac? Ran slow as a turtle. Office 95 for Windows running under Virtual PC actually ran faster! Apparently MS built in a crappy Windows emulator for Office 6, just so they wouldn't have to use waste time replacing Office 95's DLL files).

    2. Re:Partly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd better believe it! Anyone remember Office 6 for Mac? Ran slow as a turtle. Office 95 for Windows running under Virtual PC actually ran faster! Apparently MS built in a crappy Windows emulator for Office 6, just so they wouldn't have to use waste time replacing Office 95's DLL files).

      I remember that as well. At the time I was the lead student manager for a computer lab at the university. We were agast at how crappy Word 6 was compared to the very well done Word 5.1. One of the university staff pulled me aside one day after the Office update and showed that Word 6.0 ran faster on the old 68040 Macs than on the new PowerMacs. This convinced the staff to delay the replacement of the 68040 machines and revert the Office suite on the PowerMacs to the previous version. I sugested switching to WordPerfect, which with academic pricing was 1/4 the cost of Word. My suggestion was appreciated but quickly shot down. It turned out that the cost of MS Office was subsidized by the college as it was deemed a "critical" application. {sigh} When will they learn, apparently not soon enough. It turns out that recently the university signed a deal with Microsoft that "rents" the latest version to all university owned computers.

    3. Re:Partly by MrLint · · Score: 1

      Speaking of NIH, some MS apps dont work with Winshade X because they dont make system calls to draw windows. Of course it doesnt work on apps running as root either. I hope over time there will be less and less need to run apps as root (privlidge elvation)

    4. Re:Partly by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Microsoft also has a *serious* NIH syndrome when it comes to anything Apple-based You mean like windowing GUIs and such? *cough-Apple source code-cough*

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:Partly by imagerodeo · · Score: 1

      Yes, Office:Mac is Carbon. (Can't you tell? Cocoa apps are small, open fast, and have great fit and finish.)

      I'm not sure how true this is today, but it used to be that office apps shared a lot of code between Mac and Windows. It makes sense - why write the app twice? I'm sure that there's lots of "edge code" these days, but I suspect that much of the core text composition is "core" - which includes the language and font support.

    6. Re:Partly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cocoa apps are small, open fast

      You have to be kidding me - you'd honestly describe something like the Calculator or iCal as being "fast"? (I know you said "open fast", but I suspect your implication is that these are also fast to use: hint they're both very slow).

      and have great fit and finish

      Now I know you're kidding. Open up a document in any Cocoa app, then open up the About box. Remind me again why the close/minimise/maximise controls in the document window remain enabled even when the about box window is in front?

    7. Re:Partly by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      > Apparently MS built in a crappy Windows emulator for Office 6

      That's also exactly what they did for Internet Explorer 4 and 5 for Solaris (and, presumably, HPUX).

      I used to run Office 4.3/Word 6 (that's what you meant, right?) on a Sparc 5 with WABI. Worked great, was much faster than my 600 MHz PIII is now with Office 2000. I would switch back, but most of my business contacts use Word 97 or better.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  65. MOD PARENT DOWN by soft_guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The parent post is misleading. Apple does have Hebrew support in MacOS X and has been supporting Hebrew for many years. (And Arabic, too.)

    Heck, they even demoed a Klingon version os MacOS X to really drive home how well they nailed international support in MacOS X.

    The issue is Microsoft Office for Mac which is not an Apple product.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  66. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they have every right not buy MS's patently inferior software.

    So why are you upset? And you think MS should retaliate? Come on man! Admit it, you're a paid MS shill!

  67. Don't get too excited by hendrix69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Israeli government is just holding out in order to get a better deal on MS products for the upcoming years. Too much of the government and the army's software is tied too MS for a transition to Linux to take place. Besides, no other platform, sadly, has as good a support of Hebrew as MS. Although it's getting better constantly - the latest OpenOffice, for example, is quite an improvement.
    There's also the issue of MS's political power through the US government. Israel gets quite a bit of money from the US and large portions of it are conditioned on the buying of American products with this money. So I wouldn't bet on Israel doing the Munich thing. At least not for a while.

    --
    The power of Christ compiles you!
    1. Re:Don't get too excited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also the issue of MS's political power through the US government.

      Israel also has an enormous amount of power over the US government. Historically considerably more than Microsoft.
      If Microsoft know what's good for them they will back down.

    2. Re:Don't get too excited by mericet · · Score: 1
      That would have been my first reaction too, the lock -in is just too great for a full switch to be realistic, but Israel do have a superb legal system (and an at least reasonable anti-trust system, which I believe will step in too soon), this is apparently a reaction to suit broght in Israel's high court for justice (AKA, the Israeli supreme court when dealing with a special kind of cases against the government, AKA Bagatz), against the anti-trust and purchasing authorities (the accountant general).

      This is apparntly (according to Israeli press in net.nana.co.il) part of the country's position before the court and can not be changed without a very good reason.

      Anyway, there is more, the accountant general said (outside the court) that the licensing agreements are problematic, especially the bundling, and would only be partially renewed for a reduced price (You are right there), without bundling (e.g. they want some licenses with only word for a fraction of the price of office, because it is only a fraction of office), and that no upgrade will come anytime soon. They also consider switching to OpenOffice and Mozilla.

      It seems that part of the answer to the court was that the country will distribute hebrew versions Linux and OpenOffice to facilitate citzen contact to the government.

      The American government do have a strong inluence here, and I don't think the army will switch, at least for that reason.

    3. Re:Don't get too excited by hendrix69 · · Score: 1

      Ignoring for a second MS's monopoly which the Israeli government had chosen to ignore up till now: the claim made by this recent ban on MS products is that MS isn't localizing it's products for Apple.
      This is a completely rediculous claim: 90%, if not more, of bidi localization is in the OS. Office and other progs are built on top of that and consequently have very little work to do with regards to localizatoin. Now they expect MS to either alter its' Office suite completely by making the localization built into the program (impossible) or to do the necessariy OS changes to APPLE's OS - impossible as well.
      This is a shake-down of MS, plain and simple. Not that I have any objections to that (what goes around), but the end result will be more MS licensing - probably long term, and that's too bad.

      --
      The power of Christ compiles you!
    4. Re:Don't get too excited by mericet · · Score: 1
      If they can't do the necessary changes, they can always go to the court, and either win (likely considering Apple's position) or delay the case forever (and 1M$/day fine until the final decision is not likely here). Anyway, it's not like the anti-trust authority did this on its own accord, they are doing it to avoid a court case against it from the user group, not wanting to dirty its hands for MS.

      The user group OTOH, didn't have a lot of other options in court, they couldn't go against Apple for giving up on Israel, that is not a monopoly decision (and with a 0% market share here, Apple is not one), they can only go against MS. I hope that ignoring the monopoly was a mistake made by the previous anti-trust administrator, which the current one is not going to repeat.

      I hope you are wrong about the licenses, but my experience causes me to agree that this is likely.

    5. Re:Don't get too excited by deblau · · Score: 1
      The Israeli government is just holding out in order to get a better deal on MS products for the upcoming years.

      Sorry, but this is paranoid speculation. If you're negotiating with someone, and there's a chance you can reach a settlement, you don't set arbitrary punitive deadlines in the distant future. Suppose MSFT offered Israel free software upgrades until the end of time, everything that you have supposed they want. How does announcing now that they're cutting off contracts until the end of '04 help Israel's bargaining position? It kinda shafts them, doesn't it?

      Nope, this one is past negotiating, folks. Israel has clearly had enough. They've decided MSFT is a monopoly, and they're gonna see justice done. And who said anything about upgrading to Linux? There are plenty of alternatives out there. And who said anything about upgrading at all? How many people do you know who still run Windows 95, or Linux 0.99, or AIX, because it works?

      Let's not be unnecessarily self-recriminatory. We scored a big one here, let's celebrate.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  68. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yews? Yes, yew trees are nice. I hear there are a lot of them in Israel.

  69. This proves it! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    1. G-d Speaks Hebrew

    2. Macs don't support Hebrews

    THEREFORE G-D USES WINDOWS!

    1. Re:This proves it! by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      Hmm, OK, I know this was a joke, but...
      2. Macs don't support Hebrews
      1) they don't support Hebrew, not Hebrews
      2) they do support Hebrew, just that the MacOS X versions of Office don't. In the article they talk about the OS supporting R to L scripts such as Hebrew (and Arabic and Urdu) since 10.2.

      Maybe this is proof G-d uses OpenOffice? =)

    2. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      who'se "G-D"?

    3. Re:This proves it! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      2) they do support Hebrew, just that the MacOS X versions of Office don't. In the article they talk about the OS supporting R to L scripts such as Hebrew (and Arabic and Urdu) since 10.2.

      The Mac OS X versions of Office came out before MacOS 10.2, which is why there's no support in Office v.X for right-to-left languages.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    4. Re:This proves it! by mortonda · · Score: 1
      Don't be silly. There's a huge hole in your logic. (I guess it might be "holy".... groan)

      God obviously doesn't use Microsoft... He uses something that works better. I would think that would be obvious on a site like /. :P

    5. Re:This proves it! by asparagus · · Score: 1

      Nah...God uses a mac and is tired of waiting for Office support, so he 'urges' the Israeli government to sue to help fix his problem.

      Now, if only he was into gaming. Of course, that would mean that the Bungie aquisition was the work of the devil...

    6. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the huge hole was in the bizarre dash between the G and the d.

    7. Re:This proves it! by Quobobo · · Score: 1

      No, Bungie being sucked up by MS is pretty obviously Satan's work anyway.

    8. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spelling the word "God" in it's entirety is by some, considered taking it in vain.

    9. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, Jews, unlike Xtians, don't like to take G-d's name in vain, so we don't support plastering it on dollar bills that are stuffed into some stripper's panties, or putting his name in the Pledge of Allegiance.

      However, X-tians, the idol-worshippers that they are, don't mind plastering the name of one of their many "gods" (Jeezus, Mary, etc) all over the place.

    10. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. Profit?

    11. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... God's name in a girls panties, rockets into Palestinian civilian neighborhoods... what's worse?

    12. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right to left layout and ligatures were in the OS X text object from the time that OS X was called Openstep in 1996. The problem is with the Carbon and more likely with Microsoft themselves since the Office suite uses precious little Carbon as it is, but rather does a lot of it's own text layout and rendering.

    13. Re:This proves it! by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Right to left layout and ligatures were in the OS X text object from the time that OS X was called Openstep in 1996. The problem is with the Carbon and more likely with Microsoft themselves since the Office suite uses precious little Carbon as it is, but rather does a lot of it's own text layout and rendering.

      Yes, and Office for Windows handles it fine, using its own text layout and rendering. It does, however, require Uniscribe support and Opentype script support for glyph reording and substitution.

      The most obvious answer is that when Office vX first came out, the functionality needed to support it wasn't available from the API used to write it.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    14. Re:This proves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I haven't heard about G-D either... some relative of J-Lo, perhaps?

  70. Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    I have wondered before if some developers at Microsoft might have a hidden anti-semitic agenda. Before you brush me off as a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist, try the following exercise:

    1. Open MS Word.
    2. Type the letters "NYC" (capitals) into a blank document.
    3. Highlight the text NYC and change your font to Wingdings.
    4. Voila!

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    1. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I have wondered before if some developers at Microsoft might have a hidden anti-semitic agenda. Before you brush me off as a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist, try the following exercise:"

      Too late, already brushed you off as a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist.

      So tell me, why is NYC the factor that makes that message meaningful? Okay, so NYC is a well known city. Also, NYC was attacked by religious extremists. So it must mean that it's too much of a coincidence that those 3 letters happen to put up those symbols, right?

      Wrong.

      Never mind that 9-11 burned NYC into our minds, thus making "NYC" significant in relation to the symbols, the fact of the matter is just about any letter combination could have been made to have found meaning. ABC -- There's probably some skeleton in ABC's closet that could tie those symbols to an anti-semitic agenda. GWB -- That one's obvious. XYZ -- Somebody'd come up with a fake story about how one of the planes in 9-11 had 'XYZ' in the flight # or something.

      The odds that NYC would land on those symbols are pretty damn high. That's why Microsoft was sued over this. However, that is the extremist perception of what happened. Instead of thinking about the odds of that particular combination, think about the odds of those 3 symbols being tied to letters that couldn't be twisted in some fashion to make the 'message' seem intentional. Suddenly, it's not so obvious that somebody at Microsoft intentionally put an anti-jewish message in there. Don't believe me? Use your same trick, only type in MSNBC. Still don't believe me? Type SLASHDOT and tell me that 'message' isn't startlingly appropriate.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Try MSFT...does this mean things will be getting a little toasty in Redmond this Christmas?

      Bah, Humbug!

    3. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by loucura! · · Score: 1

      All those make it immediately apparent that Microsoft has some extremely violent and deranged individuals in its employ. ;)

      --
      Black and grey are both shades of white.
    4. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, try this with WebDings. You get the eye pictogram, a heart and a city pictogram. "I love New York"?

    5. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So tell me, why is NYC the factor that makes that message meaningful?

      The vast number of Jews that live there. New York, New York is heavily Jewish. It's been called "Hymietown" and "Jew York" because it's so heavily Jewish.

      And, from that background, it just "happens" that the NY abbreviation in Wingdings gives a symbol of death and a Jewish symbol? Gimme a break.

    6. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And, from that background, it just "happens" that the NY abbreviation in Wingdings gives a symbol of death and a Jewish symbol? Gimme a break."

      Yes, that's exactly what it is. Go type in some other names in Wingdings and tell me you don't find coincidental messages there. I mean seriously, what's the likelyhood that some programmer would think to put those symbols together when one spells NYC? What would possibly make him think "I know, I can put an anti-Jewish hate message in here. That'll express my hatred of jews!" Yeah right. The odds are extremely favorable for finding offensive messages in there. The NYC one there just happens to be it. NYC could just as easily have been a picture of an airplane, a skull/crossbones, and a thumbs up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Too late, already brushed you off as a tin-foil hat conspiracy theorist.

      I don't actually believe it either... it's just an strange coincidence. Anyhoo, my message was just a joke, hoping to get modded +5 funny... (why, I'm not really sure because my karma's already excellent).

      Use your same trick, only type in MSNBC. Still don't believe me? Type SLASHDOT and tell me that 'message' isn't startlingly appropriate.

      Ok, the MSNBC one looked a little crazy, but what was there about the SLASHDOT in Wingdings that made it so "startingly appropriate"? A water drop, frowny face, peace sign, thumbs down, flag, and a snowflake? What significance did you find in that message? I'm just curious.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    8. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "I don't actually believe it either..."

      Ah, wish I had caught on to that, woulda been a little more polite to ya. ;)

      "but what was there about the SLASHDOT in Wingdings that made it so "startingly appropriate"

      Well, understanding I'm not being terribly literal here, when I saw that it looked like people crying and booing over just about everything. Snowflakes, peace, countries, etc.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Ok, the MSNBC one looked a little crazy, but what was there about the SLASHDOT in Wingdings that made it so "startingly appropriate"? A water drop, frowny face, peace sign, thumbs down, flag, and a snowflake? What significance did you find in that message? I'm just curious.

      It's an angry website (frowny face) where no concensus can be reached (peace sign, thumbs down) and is always waving the flag (flag) for a product associated with a swimming (water drop) creature that comes from a cold (snowdrop) place [i.e. Linux and Tux] {Although looking, I see you missed out a pointy down finger and rearranged the order which would require a whole other interpretation which I am too lazy to do}

      It's a conspiracy I tell ya.

      Here's one for you though. If you type "WMD" using the Wingdings font, you get a crucifix, a bomb and a thumbs-down. Clearly a message that those who oppose Christianity plan to use violent methods to eliminate it. Spooky, eh? :)

      Rich

    10. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Here's one for you though. If you type "WMD" using the Wingdings font, you get a crucifix, a bomb and a thumbs-down. Clearly a message that those who oppose Christianity plan to use violent methods to eliminate it. Spooky, eh? :)

      Brilliant!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    11. Re:Hidden anti-semitic agenda at MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, don't find 'em.

      Oh, if you ignore some of the glyphs or make really strained interpretations you can make out messages, but it's like trying to pull predictions out of Nostradamus; if you try hard enough, you can invent anything.

      Instead, try just substituting one word for each picture, and see if you find any messages as direct as NY's "Death Jews" and which can also be related fairly directly to the words.

      Actually, we can find a few. LA with its "Dislike peace", showing dislike of the peace movement of the '60s. And UN with its "Christian poison" is right in line with Pat Robertson's The New World Order, where the UN is part of a Satan-inspired anti-Christian conspiracy.

      Oh, the bastard who did this was having fun planting all his far-Right Easter Eggs, that's for sure.

  71. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod up the parent who portrayed the Arabs as the nasty aggressors ?

    This is the type of propaganda that only appeals to (a) non-Arabs and (b) people who don't know their history. You have only to go back and review the history of the creation of Israel; the western powers were very generous in giving up land as long as they could steal it from the Arabs in order to "give it up".

  72. no harder than the bidi languages it supports now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    word already supports right to left for several other languages (chinese, japanese, arabic)

    so microsoft's refusal to support hebrew isnt technical. word already supports right to left, top to bottom, bidirectional, etc.

  73. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by HBI · · Score: 1

    The Europeans don't like to be reminded about their past harassment, oppression and extermination of Jews. Hence, the flamebait mod. Don't worry, this one is going down too because it tells the truth about them.

    Can't be having that, can we? Unfortunately you might succeed in downmodding a post on Slashdot today, but we will always know the truth about you.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  74. Actually, they have a lot of reasons to care by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Microsoft has perfectly valid reasons for not giving a crap about Mac users

    Actually, considering the amount of cash MS earns off MS Office for the Macintosh, they actually have a lot of 'reasons' to 'give a crap' about Mac users. The Macintosh division is one of the most profitable.

    I suppose you think apple was 'saved' by MS with that $150M stock purchase, too, don't you?(even though Apple had billions in the bank at the time.)

    1. Re:Actually, they have a lot of reasons to care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Macintosh division is one of the most profitable"

      This is something that a MS rep said in about 1998.

      There's absolutely no evidence that it's still the most profitible -- in fact Microsoft has publically complained that Office/Mac sales are falling.

  75. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I understand that you're trolling, these kindof comments are too common to let slide...

    If anyone needs the help of force it is not the Jews with their Apaches, tanks and nuclear weapons. It is the Muslims.

    The sooners people stop treating international issues as simple populatity contests (e.g. Iraq war), or worse, black and white moral issues (e.g. the war on "Terror"), the sooner the world will get back to normal.

    And note, I don't have any problems with the Jewish people. My only problem is with small groups of people (or large groups for that matter) welding disproportionate amounts of power.

  76. Nope, they're both agressors. [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Palestinians were offered everything they wanted, but Arafat denied the offer. The Palestinians were also the ones who ended the last cease fire. The Palestinians blow up buses filled with children. The Israelis at least make an effort at hitting terrorist related targets. The Palestinians are just as agressive as the Israelis (if not more).

    1. Re:Nope, they're both agressors. [OT] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Terrorist-related targets like a quarter of the residential district in Jenin, where they cut off power and water (in violation of the Geneva convention) and barred access to the hospital for nine days (also in violation of the Geneva convetion).

      Maybe you don't remember how the 2nd Intifada began? On September 28, 2000 in the midst of escalating tensions and minor outbreaks of violence and protest, hardliner and then-opposition leader Ariel Sharon made a visit to one of Judaism and Islam's most holy sites, the Temple Mount. There, backed up by a bodyguard force 1000 strong, a man with a long history in the military of picking fights with Arab forces in contravention of orders and who had had to step down as Defense Minister due to ties to the massacre of Palestinians by Lebanese-Christian militias in 1982 decided to declare that the Temple Mount would forever be Israeli territory. This sparked off riots and began three-year war that has been called the al-Aqsa Intifada.

      Oh, of course as the violence escalated, Israeli dove Ehud Barak's popularity fell as warhawk Sharon's rose, leading him to the position of power he is in today after the election of February 2001. He made a calculated political move to start a fight with the Palestinians that he so detests and has stoked the fires of war continuously. Despite the fact that polls in Israel and Palestine repeatedly show support for a two-state solution using the 1967 borders, Sharon's right-wing government refuses to compromise on the issue. Ariel Sharon is perhaps even more of a threat to peace than Yasser Arafat. His actions show that he actively does not want peace.

  77. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How strange. I have never meet anybody from the middle east who could be classified as being from the left. None are classified as communist. They are all monarchist that we (the US) help prop up, or they are fasicist/dictators (some of which we prop up as well). The only place that any communism thrives is Israel itself.

  78. Not any different from before by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    Here in the US, Microsoft was targeted for using their position in one area (operating systems) to try and force another of their products (Internet Explorer) on consumers.

    In Israel, it's about using their position in one area (office software) to try and force another of their products (Windows) on consumers.

    The only difference is how they're doing it. With IE, it was a matter of forcing you to have software and not letting you get rid of it without damaging a completely unrelated other piece of software - the OS.

    With Office on the Mac, they're denying a key service - language support - to try and force you to use the product on THEIR operating system.

    In a world where MS doesn't control everything, the makers of the office software wouldn't be the makers of an OS, and would have no duty but to serve their cusomers. Instead, we have MS crippling an important piece of software (where all other competition has been driven out) to try and force customers to use the software on their OS.

    1. Re:Not any different from before by zangdesign · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, a really good word processor for the Mac platform is made by an Israeli company. If you own a Mac, do yourself a favor and check out Mellel. It has full Hebrew support (which I don't need). I've used it some and it does what it's supposed to do.

      The key thing it doesn't do: work with Microsoft documents. Oh, yeah, and you can forget typing in equations and whatnot (but how many people in the real world really need to do that?).

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  79. language support by SpacePunk · · Score: 0, Troll

    If they support Hebrew, they should support other antiquated languages such as Summerian and ancient Egyptian!

    1. Re:language support by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hebrew is the only ancient language to still be in daily use. How many computer languages and protocols will survive 2500+ years and still be in regular use by millions of users?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    2. Re:language support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's the only language to be considered a dead language, only to be revived.

    3. Re:language support by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      revived to daily use, I guess. I was amazed, taking Biblical Hebrew, how close it was to modern Hebrew. Biblical Greek was something else.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:language support by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

      The way things are going, the X Windowing System will still be used in 2500+ years by millions of users.;)

      --
      Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    5. Re:language support by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Now I'd like to see an ancient-egyptian keyboard!!!

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  80. Re:China by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    I thought we were all fairly intelligent here

    Bzzzt

    Please pay again.

  81. THE DEADLY RESULT by 47Ronin · · Score: 1

    its interesting that Israel is suspending all its Microsoft contracts.. i wonder if MS will send its own suicide bombers to attack..

    then what that occurs, Bush will conclude that MS has weapons of mass destruction and the marines will storm Redmond, take over, topple the statue of Bill, then get attacked by guerilla MS supporters with rocket-propelled grenades.

    Beware!!

    --
    Those who laugh at you for you having a Mac.. are the people who constantly call you to fix their PC.
  82. LONG SINCE DEBUNKED by Microsoft by StandardCell · · Score: 1
    From Snopes Wingdings Legend Page:

    Here is Microsoft's official statement on the issue:

    We can certainly understand how people would respond with some shock to this apparent issue. We did too when it first came up nine years ago and we investigated it thoroughly in partnership with the Anti-Defamation League. The conclusion was that the sequence in the Wingdings character set is coincidental and that there was no malicious intent. In fact, it impacted several software companies at the time and continues to do so. Unfortunately, there was not an easy way to fix the problem. We understand that this requires explanation.

    At the simplest level, wingdings and webdings are much like an alphabet of characters and provide thousands of potential combinations from which a person could choose. Changing the character set would create an impact of unknown scale on existing data and code using the affected font. Again, using the example of the alphabet, what would happen to existing documents and applications if we switched around a handful of letters? The likely result is that we would create significant issues for people, cause some unintended humorous moments and several offensive ones. For that reason Wingdings has been left unaltered since its inception.
    So, while it fails your tin-foil hat test, it doesn't look like it's really connected. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation.
  83. cant be any harder than japanese support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    after all japanese not only has left to right, but top-bottom right to left.

    and tah dah, microsoft already supports it.

    arabic and hebrew are child's play in comparison.

    and woot, microsoft supports arabic.

    so microsoft's objection to supporting hebrew isn't technical, at all.

    1. Re:cant be any harder than japanese support. by Mike+A. · · Score: 1

      Does Microsoft actually support Japanese in that order? All the Japanese apps and web pages I've seen go left-to-right top-to-bottom, just like European languages.

      --

      --
      Do I look like I speak for my employer?
    2. Re:cant be any harder than japanese support. by amake · · Score: 1

      Office for OS X supports vertical text. There is no support for vertical text in HTML that I know of, so of course you've never seen a vertical-text webpage.

    3. Re:cant be any harder than japanese support. by bani · · Score: 1

      you can make chinese / japanese vertical text in html using tables, but it is a major PITA. i've seen some sites do it though. still other sites use gif/jpeg images for vertical text (some arabic sites do this as well as arabic support in browsers tend to suck ass).

      explicit vertical text support is in css though.

      microsoft has (i guess nonstandard) support for vertical text.

  84. Jews.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit crying you bunch of oily faced, kinky haired, asthmatic, inbred, back-stabbing, money grubbing Jews!

    1. Re:Jews.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      end yourself nazi fuck

    2. Re:Jews.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get back in your oven!

  85. Move along, nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you sing with me?
    Troll!

  86. Mod GrandParent UP! by temojen · · Score: 1

    Come on, that was one of the few funny, on topic posts to this thread.

  87. Shiny head by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His shiny head would prolly absorb the explosion.

  88. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Youse." It's Yankee for "Y'all."

  89. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft has perfectly valid reasons for not giving a crap about Mac users. If I were Bill Gates, I would reply to this by removing Hebrew support from Office for Windows."

    Wow, you think a business should retaliate against its customers because they refuse to deal with MS?

    Let me know if you run any businesses so I can be sure not to buy from them, your customer service departments would be horrible!

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  90. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If I were Bill Gates, I would reply to this by removing Hebrew support from Office for Windows.

    Since when does it makes sense for a company to respond to a reasonable feature request by retaliating against the customers who asked for it?

    This is a very straightforward issue: Israel says it needs Hebrew support, and Microsoft needs to provide it to keep Israel as a customer. Perfectly reasonable. There's no need to get mad or retaliate. Just act like a professional.

  91. Isn't Microsoft dropping Office for Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The five year agreement (remember Jobs grovelling before Gates on the big screen?) under which Microsoft provided support for Microsoft Office on the Mac is over. It expired August 7, 2002. Microsoft has already stopped development of Internet Explorer for the Mac. It's expected that they will pull the plug on Office for the Mac, too. So what's suprising about this?

  92. Pig Latin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will not purchase MS products until they support a language from the motherland.

  93. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per the US military, the estimated size of the marxist groups is only 500. Not much of a real threat.I suspect that you will find far more than that in Israel who are defined as Communist or Marxists.
    In response to the right-left thing, I have noticed that freedom fighters are simply the ones fighting on our side and suicide bombers are always on the other side. Right now, many Iraqis and Al Qaeda are calling themselves "freedom fighters" and refering to us as "targets".

  94. Re:I like Jews by Avada+Kedavra · · Score: 1

    Lord Voldemort's wand is made from the Yew tree.

  95. Very interesting by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    This news is very interesting considering the fact that Bill Gates during his visit in Poland today has made a great deal in supporting Polish language, giving Windows to every school, to the government (even the source code with the ability to modify and compile!) like the 99.8% (plus being the only OS supporting the mandatory tax software) was not enough. Poland, like Israel, has been repeatedly exploited by Germans (and Poles, just like Jews, often hate Germans for what they did to their people) who incidentally are opposing Microsoft domination, scientology roots of core Microsoft developers and the recent SCO FUD campain, but now, when Poland is joining the EU, it is much better camrade for Microsoft to fight Germans than Israel is, thanks to its veto power in European Parlament and corrupted government (from the lowest levels up to prime minister). Or is it just US being grateful because Poland has blindly followed Bush in his Iraq invasion? Obviously nobody can be sure about it, but certainly I can't wait to see how it will end.

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Very interesting by fejikso · · Score: 1

      Well, you have to remember that Polish is written in a very similar way as English, as it is an modification/extension of the Roman alphabet, whereas Hewbrew uses a completely differerent alphabet (which shouldn't be any problem if Unicode is used properly), and more important, is not written in the same direction (which can be a big problem to fix if you didn't think about this when coding your program).

    2. Re:Very interesting by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      Israel was never expoited by the Germans. Israel, recently, did not exist untill after WWII.

  96. win/win by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    Both the Israelis and the Palestinians make claim for the same land. For decades, both sides have made it obvious that neither will leave.

    My question: why must one side lose and the other win? Why don't the Israelis and the Palestinians work together and create a secular democratic government? Jews and Arabs can work and live side by side. This is a win/win situation! Let economic freedom and inter-dependencies foster peace.

    If the Israelis and the Palestinians are arguing JUST over land, then this is the solution. If the issue is about revenge, then there is no solution.

    1. Re:win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They call the same god by a different name, it'd never work.

    2. Re:win/win by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      They call the same god by a different name, it'd never work.

      good point. In Soviet USA, people claim different gods have the same name: "under God".

    3. Re:win/win by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      My question: why must one side lose and the other win? Why don't the Israelis and the Palestinians work together and create a secular democratic government? Jews and Arabs can work and live side by side. This is a win/win situation! Let economic freedom and inter-dependencies foster peace.
      That is the conclusion "leftist" intellectuals like Eqbal Ahmad and Edward Said eventually reached. However, you have to understand that if Israel becomes a multiethnic pluralistic democracy, it is no longer Israel. Zionism is predicated on Jewish sovereignty. Israel without Zionism is a tough sell to Israelis (because it eventually means Palestine).

      Conversely, the single state solution requires Palestinians accept their disenfranchisement. When the UN partitioned Palestine, Jews comprised about 31% of the population and owned 7% of the land. The plan awarded them more than half the country, and the 1948 war and expulsions disenfranchised hundreds of thousands more Palestinians. When Ahmad and Said began preaching the single state solution, it was blasphemous to mainstream Palestinian nationalists. Now the Palestinian body politic is more receptive to such a message. But the same weariness which created this spirit of compromise has empowered a competing religious radicalism which doesn't know the concept of compromise and will actively disrupt any hint of it.

      Is it hopeless? Yes and no. The reality is a single state solution is all but inevitable. Israel's Jewish population is shrinking and its Palestinian population (Muslim, Christian and Druze) is growing. If you count non-Israeli citizens in the occupied territories, Palestinians under Israeli rule will soon outnumber Jews. While the current administration envisions a South African style minority rule surrounded by Palestinian Bantustans, such a model is not sustainable. In the long run it will suffer the same fate as South Africa: pluralistic multiethnic democracy.

      ". . . Let us not today fling accusation at the murderers. What causehave we to complain about their fierce hatred to us? For eight years now, they sit in their refugee camps in Gaza, and before their eyes we TURN into our homestead the land and villages in which they and their forefathers have lived. We should demand his blood not from the [Palestinian] Arabs of Gaza but from ourselves. . . . Let us make our reckoning today. We are a generation of settlers, and without the steel helmet and gun barrel, we shall not be able to plant a tree or build a house. . . . Let us not be afraid to see the hatred the accompanies and consumes the lives of hundreds of thousands of [Palestinian] Arabs who sit all around us and wait the moment when their hand will be able to reach our blood."

      -Moshe Dayan, eulogizing a settler killed by a Palestinian in 1969-
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    4. Re:win/win by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      "Just land" is a lot to argue about. For example ,the Palestinians do not have a ntional budget big enough to compensate all the israeli settelers with equal DEVELOPED acreage in what would be the remaining nation of Israel. They simply couldn't afford it, if they spent 100% for decades on nothing else. So someone else has to pay. Then there's the typical settler. He dosn't want to move. If he is forced to move to a new place, there will be something wrong with it. If the schools are as close then it's farther to the hospital, or to visit the relatives, or the water isn't as good (and if it tests as good, it still tastes funny). So he wants to more than break even, he wants extra. Rather, what he defines as even is always a lot better than what looks even to outsiders. Now, not only the PLO can't afford to give him what he wants, it would be a strain on Israel's taxes. The secular, democratic government is also improbable. The people on both sides who are the most commited are highly religious. They don't like their secular fellow jews or arabs, and in fact, consider a secular government to be every bit as bad as being forced into the sea by their enemies.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    5. Re:win/win by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      thanks for the links. very interesting.

    6. Re:win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question: why must one side lose and the other win? Why don't the Israelis and the Palestinians work together and create a secular democratic government? Jews and Arabs can work and live side by side. This is a win/win situation! Let economic freedom and inter-dependencies foster peace.

      The short answer: because we're (the jews) are afraid the arabs will kill us all.

      Given that they tried doing just that in both 48 and 67, and arguably also 73 (at least the syrians), it's a reasonable fear.

      If the Israelis and the Palestinians are arguing JUST over land, then this is the solution.

      First, it is not just about land, it is a clash of cultures. Also it is an Israelly-Arab conflict, not just with the palestinians. Actually the Palestinians were always used as an expendable tool by their Arab backers.

    7. Re:win/win by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1

      Here is another good Eqbal site. He was not just a brilliant academic, but a man of great principle and compassion who awed inspired everyone around him.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    8. Re:win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Given that they tried doing just that in both 48 and 67, and arguably also 73 (at least the syrians), it's a reasonable fear.

      You have inverted history. It was Zionists who expelled three quarters of a million Palestinians in 1948 (sure the Arab nations responded, but other than the Trans-Jordan Legion, who quickly cut a deal for the West Bank, the hastily constituted Arab forces were pitifully overmatched by the better armed and seasoned Haganah/Irgun/Lehi forces), and it was Israel which attacked Egypt, Jordan and Syria in 1967 (Some claim Jordan fired first in Jerusalem. Even if this is true it would be a clear case of collective self defense under the UN charter. Jordan and Egypt even had a mutual defense treaty.) OTOH, it was Syria and Egypt (with help from Tunisia, Morrocco and Iraq, and money from Saudi Arabia) which attacked Israel in 1973.

      First, it is not just about land, it is a clash of cultures. Also it is an Israelly-Arab conflict, not just with the palestinians. Actually the Palestinians were always used as an expendable tool by their Arab backers.

      Lets see, Israel has peace treaties with Jordan and Egypt and has decimated Lebanon. Iraq is occupied by the US. That leaves Syria isolated, impoverished and at the mercy of overwhelming US and Israeli forces. Exactly what Arabs, other than Palestinians are you afraid of.

      Clash of cultures?! ROTFL they hate Israelis for their way of life, huh?
    9. Re:win/win by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 1
      "Just land" is a lot to argue about. For example ,the Palestinians do not have a ntional budget big enough to compensate all the israeli settelers with equal DEVELOPED acreage in what would be the remaining nation of Israel.

      Compensate the "settlers?" That is insane. "Settling" is a war crime. Article 49, paragraph 6 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states "the occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territories it occupies." Likewise, the 1907 Hague Regulations prohibit the confiscation of public and private property in occupied territory. Furthermore, you make it sound like these "settlers" have made some kind of risky capital investment in these camps. In actual fact they live of fat Israeli government subsidies. "Settlers" receive tax breaks, grants and loans for land and construction, subsidies for water and agriculture, free schooling, and preference in government jobs. In many cases the government even pays to bulletproof their cars. If Israel can foot the bill for their "settlement" she can also pay to relocate them.

      During WWII the Germans packed up my entire family, confiscated all their property and sent them to Auschwitz. They then imported Germans to live in there houses. After the war, nobody asked the four survivors to compensate the Germans for their relocation back to Germany. On the contrary, they received generous reparations checks from the German government till the day they died. After the fall of Jaruzelski, the Polish government offered repatriation, as required by international law. If I had the original deed, I could go to Warsaw and claim my mother's house.
      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
    10. Re:win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      It was Zionists who expelled three quarters of a million Palestinians in 1948 (sure the Arab nations responded

      The expulsions were done as a part of a war. This war was declared by the arabs, and armies from seven states invaded the fledgeling Israel.

      The arabs started this war in response to the israelly declaration of independence at 16/5/48, i.e. to Israel's very existence as a sovereign state, not to the subsequent deportations.

      (Oh, talking about deportations, lookup the number of christian palestinians as a function of time in the occupied teritories. It seems that muslim palestinians are no stranger to quiet ethnic deportations themselves ... )

      Israel has peace treaties with Jordan and Egypt

      And a treaty cannot be broken ... like the Oslo agreements ...

      That leaves Syria isolated, impoverished and at the mercy of overwhelming US and Israeli forces

      Good. I'd keep it that way in fear they'd grow strong again.

      Exactly what Arabs, other than Palestinians are you afraid of ?

      The afforementioned Egypt, Saudi-Arabia, Iran (Muslim and extremely hostile, though not exactly Arab) are all currently powerful muslim nations.

      Clash of cultures?! ROTFL they hate Israelis for their way of life, huh?

      I'm impressed by you finding this a laughing matter, but I'll answer seriously all the same. I think the arab, and palestinian in particular, cultures are adulescent: Instead of concentrating on their own considerable internal problems, they are busy trying to kill more successful cultures. That, I think, is the real reason for the arab death-worship. It is, indeed, a clash of cultures.

    11. Re:win/win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The expulsions were done as a part of a war. This war was declared by the arabs, and armies from seven states invaded the fledgeling Israel.

      The arabs started this war in response to the israelly declaration of independence at 16/5/48, i.e. to Israel's very existence as a sovereign state, not to the subsequent deportations.

      The expulsions started before the declaration of independence. "During May 1948, ideas about how to consolidate and give permanence to the Palestinian exile began to crystallize, and the destruction of villages was immediately perceived as a primary means of achieving this aim... Even earlier, on 10 April, Haganah units took Abu Shusha... The village was destroyed that night... Khulda was leveled by Jewish bulldozers on 20 April... Abu Zureiq was completely demolished... Al Mansi and An Naghnaghiya, to the southeast, were also leveled... By mid-1949, the majority of the 350 depopulated Arab villages were either completely or partly in ruins and uninhabitable...

      ...Ben Gurion clearly wanted as few Arabs as possible to remain in the Jewish state. He hoped to see them flee. He said as much to his colleagues and aides in meetings in August, September and October 1948. But no general expulsion policy was ever enunciated and Ben Gurion always refrained from issuing clear or written expulsion orders; he preferred that his Generals 'understand' what he wanted done. He wished to avoid going down in history as the 'great expeller' and he did not want the Israeli government to be implicated in a morally questionable policy... But while there was no 'expulsion policy', the July and October 1948 offensives were characterized by far more expulsions and, indeed, brutality towards Arab civilians than the first half of the war." Benny Morris (Israeli historian) "The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949"


      The Arab intervention in the war between Zionists and Palestinians was a clear case of collective self defense against a foreign invader. Sadly for Palestinians, the combined "armies" were almost entirely untrained and poorly armed volunteers. They were no match for the powerful Zionist military. The exception of course was the TransJordan Legion, but Abdullah was no Palestinian patriot or Arab Nationalist. All he wanted was the West Bank and he quickly concluded a backroom deal with Ben Gurion to secure it.

      And a treaty cannot be broken ... like the Oslo agreements ...


      Good point, Israel has never complied with the Oslo Agreements. However, Israel's relationship with Jordan and Egypt is quite a different matter. And all three have relationships with the US which guide their foregn policies (Israel less than Egypt and Jordan). Egypt and Jordan fought in the first Gulf War for crying out loud! Arab nationalism is dead in those countries. And with no USSR they don't have any alternative to remaining US clients.

      I'm impressed by you finding this a laughing matter, but I'll answer seriously all the same. I think the arab, and palestinian in particular, cultures are adulescent: Instead of concentrating on their own considerable internal problems, they are busy trying to kill more successful cultures. That, I think, is the real reason for the arab death-worship. It is, indeed, a clash of cultures.


      I have to laugh at your racist drivel. Otherwise I'll cry.
  97. Re:Freedom of expression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sh*t head liberals believe in freedom of expression, but only for those people that express the same thoughts as they do.......

    So are you saying that reasonable people should respect the opinions of others, even if they don't agree with those opinions? What a great idea!

    Now do it.

  98. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

    Wow, you think a business should retaliate against its customers because they refuse to deal with MS? Let me know if you run any businesses so I can be sure not to buy from them

    Sounds like he works for SCO.

  99. THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    remember that

    1. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      I don't get the whole anti-semitism thing.

    2. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a great start. Jews make up a disproportionate number of powerful people in a large number of industries, particuarly financial and media ones. Not only do almost all Jews in the US benefit directly or indirectly from the vast system of money lending we now have, but billions are sent to their trivial nation every single year. There is also the touchy subject of their religious beliefs asserting that they are God's chosen people and the rest are mere slaves.

      Just watch the news. Do you really think the average American gives a shit that 3 people died in Israel today? 3 people died in my police precinct last month. Watch the news and take not how many of their talking heads have last names which end in "man" or "berg".

      Maybe it isn't a sinister plot, but it cannot be argued that Jews distribute their population like other races in work. You will never find a Jew working in Walmart, or as a Marine Corps infantryman. You will never see him at the community college. You will see that 1/3 of Ivy League students are Jews, despite them being only 1% of the US population.

      The pattern is there, and it is the same pattern which has infuriated their neighbors for over 2000 years. This is one man's attempt to explain why. Look at all the injustice and insanity of the modern world, at the cause you will find the Jew.

      The International Jew, by Henry Ford
      Volume One: The International Jew

      "Among the distinguishing mental and moral traits of the Jews may be mentioned: distaste for hard or violent physical labor; a strong family sense and philoprogenitiveness; a marked religious instinct; the courage of the prophet and martyr rather than of the pioneer and soldier; remarkable power to survive in adverse environments, combined with great ability to retain racial solidarity; capacity for exploitation, both individual and social; shrewdness and astuteness in speculation and money matters generally; an Oriental love of display and a full appreciation of the power and pleasure of social position; a very high average of intellectual ability."

      -- The New International Encyclopedia.

      The Jew in Character and Business

      The Jew is again being singled out for critical attention throughout the world. His emergence in the financial, political and social spheres has been so complete and spectacular since the war, that his place, power and purpose in the world are being given a new scrutiny, much of it unfriendly. Persecution is not a new experience to the Jew, but intensive scrutiny of his nature and super-nationality is. He has suffered for more than 2,000 years from what may be called instinctive anti-Semitism of the other races, but this antagonism has never been intelligent nor has it been able to make itself intelligible. Nowadays, however, the Jew is being placed, as it were, under the microscope of economic observation that the reasons for his power, the reasons for his separateness, the reasons for his suffering may be defined and understood.

      In Russia he is charged with being the source of Bolshevism, an accusation which is serious or not according to the circle in which it is made; we in America, hearing the fervid eloquence and perceiving the prophetic ardor of young Jewish apostles of social and industrial reform, can calmly estimate how it may be. In Germany he is charged with being the cause of the Empire's collapse and a very considerable literature has sprung up, bearing with it a mass of circumstantial evidence that gives the thinker pause. In England he is charged with being the real world ruler, who rules as a super-nation over the nations, rules by the power of gold, and who plays nation against nation for his own purposes, remaining himself discreetly in the background. In America it is pointed out to what extent the elder Jews of wealth and the younger Jews of ambition swarmed through the war organizations -- principally those departments which dealt with the commercial

    3. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      I still don't get it. Is this an envy thing?

    4. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make me sick.

    5. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit yeah.. I can't believe the posts I'm seeing from people. I expected the arab/Jew stuff, but the bent ass white hick stuff ("Jews have all the stuff") is something I expected on a lesser site (giving Slashdot too much credit I suppose).

      I'm the sixth generation of my family to be born in the US, of German descent, and consider myself neutral here :-)

      To the people who are citing Jews as oppressors: try working for a living. No, put down the bag of Cheetos and stop playing with yourself. You're the worthless shits who spend a little more than six hours a day working at CompUSA, getting pissed off at all the people coming in buying stuff, and wonder why your life sucks. If you aren't willing to bend over backwards at some point in your life and elevate your lifestyle, you deserve to be a worthless, disgruntled prick. You're social fodder for the rest of the world that is willing to be constructive and actually work to achieve a goal. Someone had to bust ass at one time or another, it's just that some people had the benefit of inheriting it....boo hoo, go to work..

    6. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its more fundamental than that.

      Where ever you have a group within a group that resist integration then you will get resentment.

    7. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially when that group considers themselves to be God's chosen people, and everyone else are mere slaves.

      Maintaining your own culture is not really the issue, but maintaining it at the expense of the host culture will always breed resentment.

      This has happened in every modern culture going back to Hammurabi. Are we to believe that every civilization, since civilzation began, has been flawed? No, I think it is better to see some truth in the history that has come before us...

    8. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not merely envy. Would we all like to have a rich and fabulous life? Of course. But the difference is the Jew doesn't have the same range of difficulties and opportunity as the average gentile. The Jews themselves see nothing wrong with their place in society. They believe they are God's Chosen People and they ARE superior, and it is their place in the world to be at the top.

      The problem is, history is driven by the great struggle to be at the top. The Jews incessently attempt to achieve their biblical right, and as a result others will fight it. This has been going on since the Roman Empire was founded.

      When it comes down to it, everyone wants at least the opportunity to achieve positions of power. The only question is who will they accept as leaders? In every society going back 2500 years, the host people have always rejected the Jews.

      In truth, the reason is simple. No one ones a perceived foreigner as a leader. People want a leader who they believe is of their own kind and is looking out for them. The Jew has achieved none of these things. Wherever he goes, his underlings perceive him to be arrogant, unjustly powerful, and exploitive. No we can argue whether or not this is true. But as we have said. Are we to believe that every culture which has hosted the Jew (Rome, Babylon, Egypt, England, Spain, Venice, Germany, etc) is wrong? How is it this pattern is repeated so thoroughly?

      What it boils down to is civilzation as we know it is NOT the natural progression of man. It requires a certain measure of kinship and compassion, and when this ceases to exist, those ruled over have no incentive to maintain the civilization any further. In most cases, these oppressed people attempt to start over, by expelling their unjust overlords. This has frequently been the Jews. In every case, you wil find that culture prospered after the expulsion of Jews.

      It is a complicated subject, and it cannot be simplified to the extent you wish. The best thing to do is read through history, and there is a lot of it, then make up your own mind. Part of the reason Germany, Hitler, and National Socialism are so villified today is to make people forget the deep historical roots of national expulsion of Jews. On its own, Der Monster Reich seems horrific, but placed in the context of Western History, it is a mere chapter in a 2800 year saga. The only question is when will resentment to the Jews reach a new level, where their expulsion is deemed necessary? It will happen, as it always has.

      Anti-seminitism is not an answer in and of itself, the behavior of Jews is intrinsicly offensive in some way. Read about it, and you will understand.

    9. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      "Are we to believe that every civilization, since civilzation began, has been flawed?"

      If they weren't flawed, why aren't they still around? You're not actually going to blame a tiny ethnic group on the collapse of all civilizations, are you? Even Chinese civilization has eaten itself multiple times without any help from Judaism.

      I think the simpler explanation is that civilizations are flawed, rather than reverting to some kind of third-rate racism.

    10. Re:THE ONLY GOOD ISRAELIS ARE DEAD ISRAELIS by Rimbo · · Score: 1

      Didn't the Christians behave the same way, believing that they alone held the truth?

      Haven't the Chinese existed for millenia believing themselves to be the center of civilization?

      Why single out the Jews when EVERYONE believes themselves superior?

      You're ascribing to Judaism something which is appropriately ascribed to almost all races, religions, etc. You yourself, by vilifying the Jews, have done that very thing which you accuse Jews of doing.

      I think what's really going on here is that you're blaming the world for your troubles rather than

      1. recognizing that everyone faces those troubles, and
      2. doing something proactive to make things better.

      That's the one and only thing that's become clear from this discussion.

  100. Accountability? by hethatishere · · Score: 1

    And with it's newly obtained security assured by using Anything Other than Windows(TM), the already piss-poor accountability of Israel drops once more.

    --
    Something intelligent here.
  101. This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    Geez the racism is quiet pathetic around here. This subject is not to be used as an excuse to insult Arabs nor Israel nor Jews.

    As for Mac Office in Hebrew, well they should have to use Windows. I don't see Apple porting it's software to PC.

    1. Re:This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is required to maintain its Office suite on the Mac per its antitrust settlement. Apple, well, isn't a monopoly, and isn't mandated by the government to do anything special.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    2. Re:This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      Why should Microsoft loose money and time for such a small market? If they don't like it, they shall feel free to use another office suite.

    3. Re:This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft is a convicted criminal, and convicted criminals do not get to always do things that make themselves the most money. That's not flamebait or trolling, it is a simple fact. /shrug

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by vbdutch · · Score: 1

      At last, a sane voice. Agree with you. I'm Israeli (I guess it will build up a tail of racist replies, go on cowards) and I'm disgusted to see both. Is this me or US has changed so much in the last two years? What's even more pathetic, all those messages are signed by "anonymous cowards". I guess that's what most racists are. Concerning Mac Office in Hebrew issue, there is a pragmatic reason for that. Israel is mostly Microsoft country (because, sadly, M$ has built the best support for bidi languages), but Mac hardware is still in use in some government offices, and (judging from what some of my government customers say) it is not as upgrade-hungry as PCs. So naturally, they want to keep 'em, but with the new office they won't have any choice.

    5. Re:This is not the place to insult Jews nor Arabs by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      Why should Microsoft loose money and time for such a small market?
      Did you even read the post you are responding to? BECAUSE MICROSOFT IS A MONOPOLY. This is part of what happens when you're a monopoly, you have to play by some stricter rules. There isn't a viable alternative to the Office suite, if you want to work with almost any other company out there. So MS has to provide reasonable support for the competition. That means porting Office to the Mac in a timely fashion.

      But aside from that, your logic is frighteningly small-minded. Why should stores have wheelchair accessible entrances? Such a small market, and not worth the money it costs to set up such a thing, I would think.
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  102. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    racist idiots?
    mmmmm
    let me search...
    ...ah yes!
    they come mostly from the USofA, just have a look at their current government.

  103. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Studies have shown that everyone sees the same exact articles as biased against their POV. You seem to be echoing that.

  104. Does this mean... by donnz · · Score: 1

    Microsoft will have to build a "fence" round Isreal?

    -1 Troll

    --
    -- Free software on every PC on every desk
    1. Re:Does this mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg, mod parent up!

  105. CONSPIRACY by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    spell "jew" and change the font to wingdings... Hmmm you'll find that it translates to "become a Christian and you'll be happy" if you read it right to left like Hebrew...

    and what with that two towers thing, bit much for co-incidence hey?

    1. Re:CONSPIRACY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see your "jew" and raise you "love"
      *throws 2 chips to centre of table*

  106. Re:China by wass · · Score: 1
    Where the hell do these racist idiots come from?

    Welcome to slashdot.

    You thought the anti-Chinese comments from yesterday from their successful launch were bad and racist? This is really the worst thread discussion I have seen on /. in a LONG time. Seriously. Maybe about 15% tops of the comments posted so far are related to the topic at hand.

    If it was any other country with similar or worse human rights record, say Sudan, people would be rejoicing at their rejection of MSFT. But Israel bashing is just too chic these days.

    I'm saddened that with the China thread on slashdot many open-minded people went out of their way to say "Don't bash China for their human rights, let's celebrate this achievement instead." But only hours later, there's silence as the ignorant masses troll away.

    --

    make world, not war

  107. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    This is a very straightforward issue: Israel says it needs Hebrew support, and Microsoft needs to provide it to keep Israel as a customer. Perfectly reasonable. There's no need to get mad or retaliate. Just act like a professional.

    Professional?? Microsoft? You haven't seen Steve Ballmer's "Monkey Dance" video yet, have you?

  108. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by mr100percent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    When the numbers of children who died are concerned, I'd say yes.

    318 Palestinians under 18 killed by the IDF from 2000-2002. That's not including the dozens more in the past year. I know Israeli children died as well, but I don't know how many.

    I don't see homeless Israelis in the news, but as of today over 1200 Palestinians are homeless in Rafa refugee camp due to the bulldozing over the past 4 days.

    1715 Palestinians were killed by the IDF during 2000-2002. Only 20 investigations by the IDF into incidents where Palestinians died, which led to only 2 indictments.

  109. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by mr100percent · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wouldn't generalize all 200 million Arabs the same way though. A huge proportion support a two-state plan, which meant they would live with an existing Israel. If everything went back to the 1967 boarders, terrorism would drop by 95% IMO.

    Remember, Arafat accepted the two-state Road Map immediately, while Ariel Sharon refused.

  110. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    prove that, where do they say that? Link?

  111. im gunna jihad yo ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    b10tsh!

  112. Are you high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your post made no sense.

  113. seriously, though by Spetiam · · Score: 1

    Israel has long been considered to have the best intel/security...perhaps this also says something about computer security? ;)

  114. Re:fuck you by mr100percent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That would be true if it weren't for the fact that England, France, European countries also condemned Israel for some of their actions. Arabs didn't lead the condemnation, other Western governments did. There have been 74 UN resolutions concerning Israel that Israel has defied.

    Why are you changing the subject to Sudan? That's another injustice yes, but how does that relate in any way to Israel? Israel's politics are responsible for 9/11, according to Bin Laden. You sound like George W. Bush, when confronted with his "affirmative action" stance at colleges, he replied that Saddam is a menace and must be stopped.

  115. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    Should a business retaliate against customers? No, that is dumb. Should it retaliate against governments? You bet.

  116. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course that is because Israel is not a Communist country, therefore it doesn't get much sympathy from Linux lovers.

  117. Too Bad by JCMay · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Too bad there's historically no such thing as "Palistinians," and has never been a soveriegn nation called "Palistine."

    Too bad that the Six Day War didn't go the way you think it should have. Since when does regions conquered in wartime count as "stolen?" It was won, fair and square.

    Too bad nobody realizes that there will never be peace in the Middle East until one side wins. Whom ar you rooting for?

    1. Re:Too Bad by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 1
      Too bad there's historically no such thing as "Palistinians," and has never been a soveriegn nation called "Palistine."

      Historically there's no such thing as Midwesterners, and there has never been a sovereign nation called "The Mid-West." Yet I'm darn well a Midwesterner and live in the Mid-West.

      There are a bunch of people in a place who feel that they are a distinct group. They need a name, if only because it's shorter than summarizing their status every time you mention them and the region. Palistinians works well enough.

      Historically there wasn't a United States, but things changed. Historically Israel was a long dead idea, but things changed.

      Now, whether or not Palistine should become an independent nation, or be aborbed by one or more nations surrounding it is an interesting discussion. Attempting to define Palsitine out of existance is just sticking your head in the sand.

      Too bad that the Six Day War didn't go the way you think it should have. Since when does regions conquered in wartime count as "stolen?" It was won, fair and square.

      Egad, to suggest that taking land by force is "fair and square" is a scary idea. Iraq managed to take and hold Kuwait over six months. Should Kuwait simply have been ceeded to Saddam? Germany managed to hold large portions of Europe for a long, long time, were the Allies so horrible to force them back? Are we to return to Might Makes Right, if you can take it, it's yours?

    2. Re:Too Bad by admbws · · Score: 1
      Too bad there's historically no such thing as "Palistinians," and has never been a soveriegn nation called "Palistine."
      Shame. Because they exist now.

      P.S. it's spelt "Palestine".
    3. Re:Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad nobody realizes that there will never be peace in the Middle East until one side wins. Whom ar you rooting for?

      So let's hope the Arabs win.
  118. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    I kinda prefer murder/suicide bombers, myself. Everyone knows the concept of a murder/suicide. The term "Homicide Bomber" is just a propaganda phrase that means absolutely nothing.

    (Sorry to post off-topic but I had to pipe up.)

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  119. Re:Leftists' heads explode by wass · · Score: 1
    You said it!

    Remember all the leftists that came out yesterday and today trying to prevent criticism of China and it's human rights record in the slashdot discussions? Don't be racist and complain about China, let's look at their aerospace accomplishments instead.

    Notice that these kind of emails are notably absent now? Yeah. It's bad to criticize other countries if not about the current topic. Oh wait, unless it's Israel, those damn zionist racist apartheid colonial occupying thieves.

    --

    make world, not war

  120. Open Office Has Had Support For A While by Solokron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Open Office has had Hebrew support for quite some time.

    2002 Hebrew OpenOffice Files

    Open Office Hebrew HowTo

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    1. Re:Open Office Has Had Support For A While by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very insightfull. What can I say.
      The point is that the government is thinking about stopping using MS, maybe using OO. The point is not alternatives for you and me, better or worse, but alternative standards for the government. This could be the start of moving to OO, like Munich and other cities did (or it might fizzle out and die).

  121. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by cranos · · Score: 1

    Yup the Europeans sucked when it came to the treatment of the jews, but shit does that give the jews the right to do exactly the same to others?

    Its like the man who was beaten up on a regular basis when he was a kid, turning into a thug when he grows up because thats the only thing he knows. An eye for an eye is all very well until there aren't any eyes left to pluck.

  122. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel has some of the most communistic communities on the planet (truer to Communism than the commie nations). They are the kibbutz's. They're actually pretty cool, you can even visit them for short times. Work the fields in the daytime and eat the harvest at mealtimes.

  123. Hebrew by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

    I bought a replacement keyboard for a Gateway Solo 2500 on ebay for 9.95 USD, list price is something like 60 USD. The only "caveat", which I think is cool, is that listed under the english keys, are Hebrew letters. I thought that was pretty cool.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  124. Everyone is free to choose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It looks like microsoft is in need of Lancelot these days to fight it's battles. Other's will consider this a troll, but I think of it as a public service announcement. I've been running benchmarks against SQL Server the last couple of days simulating concurrent queries and boy am I surprised at my findings. I used the default ThreadPool to make from 10-100 concurrent queries to a single instance of SQL Server hosted on a 4 CPU box with tons of RAM. At first I expected SQL Server would handle 20-40 concurrent read queries with 30-50% CPU usage on a big 4 CPU server. Instead, what I found is with 8 or more concurrent queries, the CPU utilization is maxed out. Pretty much anything over 20 concurrent queries getting one row from SQL Server maxes out all 4 CPU's.

    What does this mean? Well that means if you have more threads making queries than the number of CPU's, it's likely you will max out the CPU utilization on SQL Server 2000. To find out more, I decided to run a single thread against SQL Server and found it causes 1 of the 4 CPU's to average 85-90% CPU utilization for the duration of the test. The queries use stored procedure, so it shouldn't cause this kind of behavior. Don't be believe, try it for yourself. I ran these tests 3-4 dozen times for different number of concurrent queries and the result is always the same.

  125. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    the western powers didn't take land from anybody.

    they divided the land into countries. Notice nobody complained when borders were drawn for Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, etc etc from the Ottoman Empire.

    No, but they create a land to be for Jews (nothing about kicking anybody out) and the Muslims of the area throw a hissy-fit. Would you say, then, that the creation of Muslim countries where Jews lived (say Jordan) thus stole those Jews land too?

    Oh wait, let's blame Israel and Jews for everything. Muslims outnumber Jews by 60 to 1, therefore better take their side. Especially to keep the access to oil. Don't want to piss them off and get an oil blockade to your country, now, would you?

    Look at history, everybody has been bad. Muslims and Jews. If the Arab countries didn't attack Israel in the first place (not to mention the next 3 times over 20 years) it would be significantly smaller than it is now, and the number of refugees would be less than 1/3 of those now.

  126. well, i'm a leftist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i think all jews and muslims should be exterminated

  127. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Interesting how you start the story in the middle, ignoring who populated that 'map' prior the establishment of Isreal.

    "All the college students bitching about the Jews really need to watch out. Western Europeans have a dangerous pogrom tradition that goes back 1000 years. It's a serious case of glass houses."

    Uhhhh? What you're saying is a no one descendent of European stock has a right to criticize anything Isreal does in the Palestine because of acts performed before they were born? That form of 'logic' aptly demonstrates why the Middle East is so fucked up.

  128. Re:I like Jews by bheerssen · · Score: 1

    Confusion, war, and terror is the normal state of the world. It is peace and understanding that is fleeting.

    We can only hope that the world will one overcome over the normal state of affairs and outbreaks of peace will be more than just pleasant footnotes in history.

    --
    (Score: -1, Stupid)
  129. Re:Frist Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know that "off-topic" is correct for the parent. Troll and/or Flamebait, sure, but I think the comment that "MS got Owned" is actually appropriate for the article.

    Maybe the parent was automatically modded down because it was:
    1) a First Post, and
    2) the guy spelled it "Frist"

  130. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

    And you don't find blaming the sins of the neighbour's great-grandparents on 'us' bigotry? Tell me again why generational hatred is ripping the middle east apart.

  131. Here's my chance to ask! by Erwos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How the hell do you type nekudot (vowels) in OpenOffice 1.1? For the life of me, I've been unable to figure it out!

    Otherwise, awesome work. Assuming you install the Hebrew fonts, Hebrew support is "out of the box" in RH9, and it even has the Culmus fonts!

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    1. Re:Here's my chance to ask! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have Hebrew font support in OO, so I can't verify this, but have you tried hitting control+number keys? This is how it works in other hebrew word processors, such as Dagesh.

  132. Israeli attacks by revisionz · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the range is on Israel's fighters? Maybe they have some old missiles around to send to Redmond? Israel _has_ been in a really pissy mood lately.

  133. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've often wondered the same. The term "Nazi" is slang for "to nationalize" and the full name of their party was "The National Socialist Workers Party of Germany." Now call me crazy, but that doesn't sound like the name of a right-wing organization to me.

  134. Double Standard by The+Monster · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Since when does regions conquered in wartime count as "stolen?" It was won, fair and square.
    I have never understood this double standard either. Back in WWII, Germany lost Silesia, Pomerania, and East Prussia to Poland, and the Russians wouldn't even entertain the notion of ending their occupation of the DDR and letting it reunify with the BRD until it was stipulated that Germany forever renounced any claims to that land. I fail to see how Judaea/Samaria, the Gaza Strip and Golan Heights should be any different - Jordan, Egypt, and Syria respectively lost those lands to Israel and that should be the end of it.

    When Jordan was the only country to support Iraq in Gulf War I, I thought the proper punishment should have been to rename the country 'Palestine' and tell all those who consider themselves 'Palestinians' that they had a homeland now and could stop fighting.

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

    1. Re:Double Standard by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      (a) A couple places, like Jerusalem, are a big deal to both sides. Land is not fungible, in this case.

      (b) (Assuming you're from the US) What if the Soviets came, took over, kicked you out of your house, and moved you up to cold Canada? Would you be thrilled at the idea of renaming Canada "The United States of America", and the exiles stop complaining and being resentful?

  135. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just before 9/11, this site had a poster of the 19 "freedom fighters" who died. It was a celebration of them in the UK. In addition, throughout this site, they move this to a fight of islam vs. west (of which it is not). This is probably not a true al qaeda site, but it has been very informative to me.

  136. No OpenOffice for Mac for a while by kingLatency · · Score: 1

    You might recall a recent article about how OpenOffice for Mac OS X is being delayed for several years. That means he'll have to use it in X11. Doable, but not as satisfying.

    --
    "I've got to stop masturbating! It makes me too lazy! Stop it, Albert. Stop it." -- Albert Einstein
  137. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

    i would like to see that ...... i really would. especially since the gov't is more likely than not acting in the best intrests of its citizens.

    Microsuck is just being a bunch of stuborn assholes, they could very easily use the mac osx hebrew libraries. but they prefer to cripple office for mac by writting some half assed butcher job to implement hebrew. this obviously pissed of the isreali gov't since their native language is hebrew.

    they will end up using openoffice/star office, because it already supports hebrew, and they wont suffer from MS's bullshit lock in/overpricing problems.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  138. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Peaker · · Score: 1

    Huh? Sharon accepted it.

  139. An opportunity here... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Anybody know if OpenOffice.org supports Hebrew?

    1. Re:An opportunity here... by websaber · · Score: 1
      none yet

      http://l10n.openoffice.org/localization_responsi bilities.html

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  140. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Peaker · · Score: 1

    Its not that simple.

    An eye-for-an-eye may prevent someone from plucking out an eye due to fear of having his own eye plucked out.

  141. mellel by rhood · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's just a way of giving a benefit to the local software market. Mellel, produced by Redlers is an excellent Mac word processor written with Hebrew and other right-to-left scripts in mind (I have no affiliation with the company).

  142. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

    apparently, you know nothing about the middle east. how many middle east nations allow palestinians citizen ship? how many middle east nations allow palestinians to vote? how many middle east nations allow palestinians to serve in the government? one. israel. now, they are hardly the agressor. i would be mad, but you're simply ignorant not spiteful. except for egypt, no other arab/muslim nation even recognizes israel's right to exist. now, look at palestinian text books. any mention of israel? none. according to oslo, they were supposed to totally revamp their texts. have they? not at all. so you got another generation of young palestinians growing up with the arab version of the blood libel.

    israel is simply in defense mode. they have no other option. but apparently we who sit safely far away can pass judgement upon them while they fight for there very existence.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  143. In israel Linux is hardly known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When I was in Israel earlier this year the Linux penetration I saw among friends was almost nil. Hopefully this action is more than a barganing move. But we must remember that even in the US most people are afraid of anything without the familiar start button. Microsoft still rides on the distinction of having the first comercial OS written in Hebrew.

  144. Re:Leftists' heads explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so who likes occuping militaristic powers? its exactly like hating the usa. its also scary. why should the hatred be so similiar...

    its sounds more like your head is exploding monsure

  145. hebrew or nsa? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is isreal really worried about here? native languaqge support, or the nsa backdoor that exists in ms software?

  146. Looking for a tin-foil hat by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    It gets better. Type the first letters of "Muslim Al-Queda" (MAQ) into word, and change the font to Wingdings.

    1. Re:Looking for a tin-foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shweet :)

  147. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If anything, if you study history you will find war follows the Jew wherever he goes. The Pax Romana, the hundred years of peace in the Roman Empire, began with the destruction of Jerusalem. Great Britain began its modern era of tolerance and enlightment in 1290 with the expelling of the Jews. This was only 75 years after the Magna Carta was signed, and things only got better. The Age of Discovery began in 1492, the same year the Jews were expelled from Spain. Yes, it can be said that whenever Jews are forced from a country, prosperity is the result.

    Look at the last century. There is ample evidence of Jewish complicity in the starting of World War I. Most of the Bolshevists were Jews. Do you really think World War II was to be fought over Poland??? Or that Germany, a country the size of Texas, was going to steal the world which was already controlled by Great Britain??? (The British Empire in 1939 was roughly 2/3 of the world). The Jews could not prevent their deportation themselves, so they enlisted some foreign powers. No, I think if the Jews had been expelled from Europe 200 years ago, the Twentieth Century would have been our Pax Romana.

    We have over 2000 years of historical evidence that Jews are trouble, and that peaceful coexistence is impossible for them. Why do we tolerate there presence still? Are we to believe that it was our predecessors who were flawed? All the way back to Caesar Augustus?

    The Jew uses confusion, war, and fear as a tool of control. It is NOT the normal state of the world.

  148. Why Orobor? Use Apple's! by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

    Why use OroborOSX and XonX? Why not just use Apple's wonderful, Quartz Extreme capable version of X11?

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  149. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by cranos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not defensive, it is offensive. The fact that the settlements still exists and in fact are growing, makes it an offensive campaign. If the Israelis were truly sincere about defence, they would have pulled back to their legitimate borders instead of routinely flouting the UN resolutions and building WMDS(mmmm seems a familiar scenario).

  150. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Can you dig up a link to the poster you're talking about? I would really like to see it.

  151. Re:Leftists' heads explode by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's cuz Israel is resembling the US a little to much for their heads right now.

  152. It doesn't make business sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac users are an insignifcant percentage of pc users. Israel is a small percentage of word users relative of the whole. That makes mac hebrew users a tiny spec. And that's assuming all mac users use word. It's not worth it to support them.

  153. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Ieshan · · Score: 1

    Hebrew is the National Language of Israel.

    There are religious nuts, and secular schoolchildren who use this product. Stop being such an ass.

  154. STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are giving the Arab people a bad name. Not all Arabs believe such trash. I bet you're probably some white American trying to make the Arab people look bad.

    1. Re:STOP by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > American trying to make the Arab people look bad

      Okay, the poster's an idiot, but he didn't say a damned thing about Arabs, so why did you make that jump? Hell, you don't even know if he's an American.

  155. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a scenario where a couple of foreign countries could take the state of Florida, disposessing most of the people who have lived there for generations, and give it back to the Seminole Indians. That these Seminoles create a policy which gives the right of almost any Indian, no matter how tenuously defined and distantly connected to the Seminole peoples, the right to settle in Florida disposessing even more people. Imagine that these Seminole Indians get caught trying to sink a warship belonging to one of their sponsoring nations and get caught stealing through spying some important weapons technology of that same sponsoring nation and passing it onto that sponsoring nations most powerful enemy. Imagine that the Seminoles come under attack by people in Georgia and Alabama that question the legitimacy of the Seminole nation and that the sponsoring nation that made the Seminole nation possible at all its manipulated into attacking Georgia and Alabama. Of course that would be crazy, I mean, something like that could *never* happen!

  156. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you speak facts here and get shot down...SlashDot likes Israel it appears. Not really sure why....

  157. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by MindNumbingOblivion · · Score: 1

    Can we get an offtopic mod for this? The issue isn't Israeli-Rest of the Region relations, its Israeli-Big American Software Monopoly relations. I don't see how discussing the merits of sucide bombings and Israel's response to said bombings has anything to do with Israel ditching Microsoft (unless you think Steve Ballmer, as religious leader of the Church of Gates, will declare a holy war in response to this) because Microsloth refused support for the official language of the Jewish state.

    For one, I think this move is commendable. Whatever your stance on politics in the region, there isn't much question about Melkorsoft's idiocy in this issue. Languages should be preserved, as a record of the human story. Refusing to provide support of any language is a blatant move to selectively propogate certain tongues over others. True, in the 'internet culture' the default speech between peoples is English, and that fact is seen as a threat in and of itself to the survival of languages, esp. such as Hebrew, which is not spoken much outside of Israel other than in ceremony or in homes (correct me if I'm wrong -- I'm admittedly ignorant of things which I'd like to know more about...I just know from my personal experience that spoken Hebrew is not a common conversational mode in the US). But what about those that aren't part of the 'internet culture', that group of people who use the internet everynow and again to find useful information for school, work, or just for the hell of it? I swear I have a point in here somewhere...something about protecting languages...Ah hell, I just thought all the bickering over who's more wrong detracted from valuable bickering over Morgosofth's idiocy.

    PS Any other good creative euphamisms for the Dark Enemy of the Internet?

    --
    #define CLUE 0
  158. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by jbolden · · Score: 1

    Should it retaliate against governments? You bet.

    You gotta be nuts to not try and avoid fights with governments. Governments can:

    a) have very long memories
    b) be able to fight at a loss
    c) escalate beyond a business's ability to respond

  159. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1
    "An eye for an eye and the world is blind."

    Mahatma Ghandi

  160. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to read the post again. We aren't talking about what happened in the 1900's, we're talking about ~2,000 years in the past. Furthermore, the Jews never left (a handful remained, thankfully), and the Arabs took the land. It was finally parceled back. This isn't propaganda, it's fact.

    The only thing Israel is guilty of today is making promises it doesn't intend to keep. Thank the Clinton legacy for basically forcing members of the Israeli cabinet into trying to pander to people like yourself in the name of peace. Kinda ironic: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU BUILD A MOSQUE ON A SACRED PLACE? Read up on it, please.

  161. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Gross body counts are MEANINGLESS.

    What really matters is what the intent of those that give the orders and carry them out. The IDF intention is not specifically to increase civilian casualties. However, that is primary strategic goal of the Palestinian factions involved.

    War is hell. Don't start what you don't have the stomach to finish.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  162. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by zukester · · Score: 1

    >>That would be a reasonable analogy, if it weren't for

    1. the fact that you were the aggressor in this conflict, <<

    Wrong on number one. Aggressors NEVER give back land taken, as Israel does-until more innocent bodies are ripped apart by bombs looaded with nails, like the Sinai they took from Egypt and gave back. Such things never happen with aggressors..........on to number two.

    >>2. continually stealing their land, <<

    Yep, as expected, wrong on number two also. Historically speaking, it is Israel's land and there is no such thing as a Palistinian. there is also, BTW no such thing as a Jordanian either, according to your line of reasoning. Jordan was made by the U.N. "Palestinians" are Jordanians, ,and Jordan hated them and still does. Even tried to kill them. Of course, you knew that. "Palestinians" are also murdering liars who cheered 9/11 and cheered todasy when three American were slaughtered by a homicide bomb.

    >>3. destroying their homes, <<

    Three strikes........glad this is not baseball.

    They are merciful enough to only destroy the homes of terrorists and their activities. Of course, the Israeli-hating-terrorist murtderous liars also destroy Jewish restaurants, hotels, cars, public places........ad nauseum. You forgot to mention that, and who has to rebuild them.

    You also neglected to mention how Israel pumps more money into "Palestine" than all of her Muslim neighbors do.

    >> 4. killing their people. <<

    No ya went and done it. Four strikes. Whoa.

    Israelis attack military targets and go out of the way (which they should not) to avoid civilian targets. Your friends the lying murderers nearly always target the innocents.

    That is why they are called "terrorists".

    Yasser Arafat invented the hijacking of planes, remember?

    Ignorance is bliss..........you are having a bliss-ard.

    Why does Israel even put up with these animals?

    Regards,
    Bob Zuvich

  163. Bill Gate's official response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Christ killers don't deserve support from our beloved Christian nation".

    1. Re:Bill Gate's official response by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Gates probably hates them because he thinks that they wrote his biography 1970 years in advance.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  164. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically, people also ignore the fact that about 1/4 of the 'killed palestinians' were killed by other palestinians.... Peace-wanting Palestinians whom the fascist terrorist authority there kills and hangs from the windows. Ever been there? It's a nightmare, they're killing their own children, in body and soul.

  165. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    War? Last time I check the Israel-Palestinian conflict isn't war but suicidal attempts by the Palestinians (no pun intended) to regain back their land autonomy. There is no war here only those with power and weapons and those without.

    With the way things are going I see a disaster occurring. I just hope some pissed off Palestinian doesn't some day create/release a virus that wipes a large number world population.

  166. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Trelane · · Score: 1
    PS Any other good creative euphamisms for the Dark Enemy of the Internet?

    Going with three themes:

    1. rejected Microsoft software
    2. Israel
    3. Evil
    I propose we name the Dark Enemy of the Internet BeezelBob .
    --

    --
    Given enough personal experience, all stereotypes are shallow.
  167. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who the hell modded this as 'Flamebait'?

    This post is spot on you dumb-ass.

  168. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Darby · · Score: 1

    Kinda ironic: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WHEN YOU BUILD A MOSQUE ON A SACRED PLACE?

    Were I the type to build a mosque, church, temple, etc.,

    Then where else would I build the freaking thing?!?

  169. Middle East Data by superyooser · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Israel's population has a cornucopia of religions and ethnicities; a rainbow of skin colors, just like the United States does. Israel has three official languages, one of which is Arabic. Arab countries, on the other hand, are monotone olive. Little diversity is tolerated. South African apartheid would be a major step up from the typical Arab dictatorship.

    See some charts below showing comparisons of liberties in various countries.

    Human Rights in the Middle East (PDF, 31.5 KB)

    Political and Civil Rights in the Middle East (PDF, 31.6 KB)

    Religious Intolerance in the Middle East (PDF, 1.15 MB)

    Freedom of Religion in the Middle East (PDF, 346 KB)


    IN DEPTH:
    Israel & Human Rights: Myths and Facts

  170. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by silversky · · Score: 0

    In other news the homicidal criminals and their families is three times higher than among non-criminals. Yes, innocents will suffer too until their own leaders promote the insane suicide culture.

  171. This is not all the reasons, by bercko21 · · Score: 1

    Do you realy think that the reason is that microsoft wont support hebrew?
    From what I've understood from the israeli goverment publications on this matter, it's because Microsoft products are not very secured, as you all know, and right now there big consideration to implemt open source software in goverment facilities.

  172. Re:What about Jordan? by wass · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Yes, this is fairly well accepted. There is lots of info out there showing that Jordan will not let Jews become national citizens.

    Read this for starters. If it was utter lies, even the Jerusalem Post wouldn't let it be posted there.

    Then read this one . Specifically Item #3, but alot of the info there will challenge the (Israel is all bad, Israel is only bad) mantra most of the "liberals" repeat. To quote it

    Turning a blind eye to article 15, Great Britain also decided that no Jews could reside or buy land in the newly created Emirate. This policy was ratified -- after the emirate became a kingdom -- by Jordan's law no. 6, sect. 3, on April 3, 1954, and reactivated in law no. 7, sect. 2, on April 1, 1963. It states that any person may become a citizen of Jordan unless he is a Jew. King Hussein made peace with Israel in 1994, but the Judenrein legislation remains valid today.

    The first quote is a column by Alan Dershowitz, if you hate pro-Israel folks then skip to the 2nd link, but I don't know who wrote it. But if either of these was pure propoganda or lies, then surely they would have been challenged by now.

    Anyway, regarding the conflict, I'm not saying Israel is innocent. But to treat the situation like Israel is doing these things in a vacuum, instead of in reaction to decades of similar violence and hatred against it, is foolish and misleading.

    --

    make world, not war

  173. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Darby · · Score: 1

    Of course there have been more Palestinian casualties. When they keep BLOWING THEMSELVES UP, what do you expect??

    I expect that I'd take out more than one on the way out.
    I imagine the body count for suicide bombers is lower than that for suicide bomber victims.

    This skews the odds the other way than that which you wanted to go.

  174. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Ezra · · Score: 0

    Besides the fact that Sharon accepted the road map, try looking back to the July 2000 Camp David summit between Clinton, Barak, and Arafat. When Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered Arafat 96% of what Palestinias claim they want, including a Palestinian capital in parts of Jerusalem, rather than accept or even come up with a counter-offer, Arafat refused the offer and left the peace talks.

    Oh and by the way, the Palestinian Liberation Orgranization PLO, was founded pre-1967 and their charter calls for the destruction of Israel so don't go thinking this is about borders.

    Ever looked inside a Palestinian elementary school textbook? Think there is one mention of a state of Israel in there? How bout the Palestinian kids' shows in arabic that look like the typical Sessame St. type show until you see 8 year olds dressing up as suicide bombers and you translate the songs they are singing and realize they are gloryfying martyrdom.

    I would read a little more history before you jump to the conclusing that Arafat, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Fatah, Tanzim, or any other terrorist is interested in a two state solution. Just look at the success Arafat and the Palestinians made out of Oslo- when Israel fulfilled every one of its obligations and the Palestinians fulfilled NONE.

  175. Is it just me or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...does Israel have difficulty with confrontations?

    Granted it sounds unfair for Hebrew not to be supported on Office/Mac. But Israelis never seem to just take a small breath, look at what is in the long-term best interest of everybody involved and work calmly towards that goal.

    It's all the more natural to lash out and attack. I'm sorry if I'm making generalizations here but you can't help but see the parallels in Israeli diplomacy (an oxymoron of the highest order) and this political/cultural issue.

  176. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by HBI · · Score: 1

    I would say the sins of your grandparents.

    Mine still remembered, particularly my grandfather who, with Patch's First Army in France and Germany, liberated Lyon and discovered some of the more odious locations in the Pan-European Reich. What he was willing to say was enough.

    It could happen again. Don't think things have gotten any better, really. You're fooling yourself.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  177. Try REDMOND it is a conspiracy! by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Try typing in REDMOND then put it to wingdings, it says bomb the place if the sun doesn't shine. Near as I can figure.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  178. Re:fuck israel by tempny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Israel!" There I said it. *poof* all the assholes instantly appear. Why don't you use your real name and have your asshole natures on record, at least?

  179. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is the long-awaited savior!

  180. Re:fuck you by letxa2000 · · Score: 0, Troll
    The United States has built miles and miles of fence on the border to prevent Mexicans from crossing illegally. And all Mexicans want are jobs. Imagine if they came packing bombs to blow up next to random Americans? I think we'd be building a wall too! I would *hope* we'd be building a wall!

    The Palestinians are guilty of a lot of bad things and the Israelis aren't innocent either. But building a wall to keep out a wave of suicide bombers hardly seems racist or radical. I'd do exactly the same thing.

  181. Re:What about Jordan? by letxa2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    There's so much garbage and propaganda out there, unless you can show me otherwise.

    A lot of it is true. We are based in the U.S. and do business all over the world. Not too long ago we received a purchase order from the United Arab Emirates. At the bottom of the P.O. was the standard stuff about terms of shipment, payment, etc. But what struck me was the first term was "No product may be built, partially or entirely, in Israel." I've lived in the U.S., I've lived in Mexico and I've worked with more races and nationalities than I can remember--but that took the cake for blatant discrimination and, if you will, racism. I was tempted to reject their purchase order and not do business with them--but I went ahead and took the order since I figured it would be wrong to just discriminate againt them in retaliation.

    Those that piss and moan about Israel haven't got a clue. I'm not Jewish, I don't even know anyone who is a Jew. But all you have to do is look at the history of the area since 1945 to know that Israel is defending itself against a real threat--or at least they were in 1967 and 1973. They took some land (that happens in many wars!) mostly to buffer themselves against future aggression and now the aggressors are complaining to the U.N. and sending in waves of suicide bombers against civilian targets?

    Sorry, I have no sympathy for the Palestinians and every suicide bomber that blows themself up and takes civilians with them just gets me itching to have the U.S. go in there and clean things up--politically correct or not.

    If Mexicans had been walking into our country and blowing themselves up on busses in New York City for the last couple of decades do you think we'd be acting as restrained as Israel?? No, we'd be building the Great Wall of the Rio Grande with armed guards patrolling it 24/7. And we'd have every right to do so.

  182. newsflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    newsflash!

    slashdotter finnally figures out that theregister conviently lies (similarly to cnn with greater magnificient indifference to the truth)

  183. The Story of Kathleen and CmdrTaco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    When Rob Malda was looking for a good wife, he figured out a way to tell if a prospective mate is a virgin or not. Whenever he saw a girl that looked all right he took her out for a ride on his moped. All of a sudden he would stop, unbutton his pants, and show her his tool. "What's that?" says he. "Why it's a pecker," the girl says. So then he would button up his pants. "You aren't what I'm looking for," says he, and back to town they'd go.

    He kept on like that for several years, but all the girls gave him the same answer. Finally he found a pretty little waitress with yellow hair that worked in a hotel. Kathleen Fent was her name. They went riding on his moped, and when he pulled out his cock she just kind of giggled. "Why that's a tee-hee!" says Kathleen. Right then and there Rob Malda know she was just what he wanted. So he and she got married and they were both mighty happy.

    About six months after the wedding, they got to talking about old times. "Honey," says Rob, "how did you come to call my tool a tee-hee, that first time we went riding?" Kathleen replied, "tee-hee is the right word for it and any other girl would tell you the same."

    Rob shot back, "Oh no, out where I was raised they call it a pecker." Kathleen just laughed. "Shucks Rob Malda," she said, "them corn-fed Michigan floozies ain't been around much. Why everyone knows that a pecker is a whole lot bigger than that!"

  184. Re:I like Jews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really stretching to use your "theme account," aren't you?

  185. Why does the US support Israel? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've always wondered why we spend tons of tax money and incur a whole lot of international ill will by supplying Israel with military hardware and backing them in many unpopular moves.

    I think it has to come down to one of two possibilities.

    The first is the one that the Arabic countries around Israel like pushing -- that wealthy, influential Jews in the United States are able to put pressure and affect enough US leadership that Israel gets backing. While I'm sure this plays a role, I doubt that it's the primary cause.

    What *does* seem a bit more plausible is that the only way the US can control the Middle East is if it's divided and fragmented, unable to use the oil supply as a weapon, and always providing us with at least one ally in the area for military staging purposes. US Middle Eastern foreign policy has seemed to focus on keeping the Middle East divided for *decades*. Israel is a wonderful divider, particularly because they're *dependent* upon US backing for their continued existance, so is certain to help out the US in the Middle East.

    The first possibility is disturbing, as it means that US citizens are not properly being served by their government. The second shows the US being uncomfortably mercenary...but I suppose that somebody has to produce the economic imbalances that keep me living the good life, so I'm much less inclined to complain about politicians playing hardball on my behalf.

  186. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by n9hmg · · Score: 1

    "An eye for an eye and the world is blind."... is a powerful statement against the petty, moronic "500 years ago, they assassinated our king in revenge for our massacring a border village, now they all must pay" bullshit.
    The great soul was smart enough to understand deterrence, punishments, rewards, behavioural psychology, etc.. If India had been occupied by a less-humane and reasonable people, his reasonable, humane approach would have been met with absolute destruction... and, he wouldn't have wasted his people's lives on it.
    I still remember Woody Morgan. I met him as he attacked me outside the choir room, at the start of 10th grade. I tried to find out what the conflict was, but was met with silence when we were supervised, and more violence when we weren't. I adjusted my schedule to avoid him, and he followed. I had to fight back three times (and be punished for turning it into a fight, the first two times) before he was finally sent away. It was nice to have a higher authority to take over and administer justice. I feel so badly for the poor people who are forced to perform the violence themselves in order to defend themselves. Can't we just "evict" the evil people from our planet? I don't mean "evil" as it is often used, in the form of "anyone who does not obey the commandments of our leader", but rather as the inverse of that... those who seek to force others to "obey the commandments of our leader". Mightn't we all just leave each other the fuck alone?

  187. Re:Try REDMOND it is a conspiracy!---IT IS!!! by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    "See the sun, it's bad. Blow it up. A flag, with skull and crossbones is bad too."

    Here they say that Sun Microsystems is bad and software piracy is bad!

    I've done it again!

  188. Doesn't matter much, anyway by epepke · · Score: 1

    Apple's APIs are such that, if you do things the right way, new supported languages will just work.

    I know this may come as a shock to some of you, but it's true.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter much, anyway by Keeper · · Score: 1

      However, we're talking about a port of an application written on Win32.

      You don't honestly think that MS would completely rewrite an application that took thousands of people to create for the PC for the Mac do you? Especially considering how substantially smaller that market is than the PC market...

      I'd be willing to wager that the Mac version consists of a bunch of Win32->MacOS wrapper libraries built into the application... And I'd be willing to bet that the MacOS design vs Win32 design does not make such a task "easy."

    2. Re:Doesn't matter much, anyway by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      Apple's APIs are such that, if you do things the right way, new supported languages will just work.

      I know this may come as a shock to some of you, but it's true.


      That's complete and utter balderdash.

      If you're writing a notepad replacement, maybe.

      If you're doing anything more complex - no, I doubt it.

      Do all applications suddenly magically support 32-bit unicode because of Apple's API support? No. They don't. So that's at least one language (namely, Chinese) that's not automatically supported.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  189. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  190. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I see plenty of coverage about Palestinians dying from Israeli attacks.

    Bullshit. The Israelis who are dying are infants, children, women, and other NON-COMBATANTS.

    The Pals who die are invariably militants also known in the civilized world as terrorists, and those immediately around them.

    The Israeli's are not filling backpacks full of explosives, rusty nails, and rat poison, walking into refugee camps, surrounding themselves with soft targets, and blowing themselves to kingdom come. The Israeli's purpose is not to take as many non-combatants as possible with them.

    The Pal's are filling backpacks full of explosives, rusty nails, and rat poison, walking into bus stops, cafes, and schools, surrounding themselves with soft targets, and blowing themselves to kingdom come. The Pal's purpose is to take as many non-combatants as possible with them.

    While this discussion was at one point about word processors, it seems to have denigrated into the typical cycle of violence horseshit you get on all the mideast discussion boards. Reading and writing Hebrew is hard enough electronically.

    Folks like Microsoft are often afraid of the retribution that the good Arab countries will impose upon them for doing any sort of business with Israel. You wouldn't believe the complete unadulterated bullshit that these twits have done in the past. See http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/ 2002/arab.html http://www.arabicnews.com/ansub/Daily/Day/020710/2 002071005.html http://www.herald.ns.ca/stories/2003/07/30/fCanada 180.raw.html

    Its amazing, that these folks have the world by the economic nuts, and cannot seem to accept a 54 year old state in its midst. The amazing and sad thing is that most people have been convienently fed and believe the fiction of this being about the Pals and their trampled rights. Yet, when you read the history of the land, and see what really happened, a very very different picture emerges.

    What has this to do with word processing? Not a hell of a lot. Though, modern hebrew was derived from the biblical hebrew, and adopted by the folks who formed Israel as their language. Israel itself was willing in 1948 to live along side a Palestinian state (a second one, Jordan being the first state, which sits on 80% of the land originally promised to form Israel). The response from the same folks who batter the worlds economy with oil, was a war. It wound up being a disasterous war for all, but in the end Israel grew. And Hebrew flourished. The Arabs responded by exiling/kicking out/persecuting all of the Jews in their lands. And starting a few more wars to drive Israel into the sea.

    And Hebrew still flourished.

    So I guess I can understand why, when someone asks for something as trivial as support for their native tongue, as at least a gesture of cultural understanding and commitment, that they would become incensed if some asshole from Redmond decided well golly gee, their ain't a big enough market... duh huh

  191. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple bullshit. The jews aren't taking out the soft targets. They aren't purposefully targetting women, children, non-combatants.

    The Palestinians are.

    The jews have been remarkably restrained. We here in the US are imposing a serious double standard on them. We need to get out of their way, and let them kick the fucking terrorists out. Our job should be to explain to the rest of the civilized world why terrorism is bad and why what they are doing is good.

    When was the last time you saw a Palestinian make a wrong turn in a car, and get torn limb from limb? Didn't happen? Happened to some jews there. Several times.

    Learn about what really has been going on there before you write. The shit in the news these days is cooked for consumption by those with weak minds, by folks with agendas and axes to grind. Israel is not winning the media war, it is the "victims". You know, those "victims" who are so disenfranchised that they have to take out women and children to protect themselves?

  192. These two are unreleated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You seem not to be aware of the background of these "double blows" - Dror Strum (that antitrust guy) haven't moved his butt about declaring Microsoft a monopoly until the high court asked him to explain why he doesn't do that.


    As far as I can tell, the suspention of the contract happened without relation to that.

  193. MS is a god... by psycole · · Score: 1

    "Thou shalt have no other gods before me"

    no wonder MS has to go.

  194. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a twit.... three wars were fought... BEFORE THERE WERE ANY SETTLEMENTS.

    It was NEVER about the settlements. Israel took the land that it captured in wars of self defense and built outposts as early warning stations. These were miltary posts as much as they were land development for families. This was to extend the defensive perimeter so that 1973 would NEVER happen again.

    And now, all through out the world, we have complete boneheads telling us that "ok, just remove the settlements and go back to the pre-war 67 borders". So you want us to go back to the old indefensible positions, which invited our "friendly" arabic neighbors to attack en-masse? You want more war that is? Are you insane?

    This was never a land grab. It never will be a land grab.

    When Sadat finally finally cried uncle, it was Arik (Ariel Sharon) who forcibly dismantled the settlements and returned to the pre-war borders. The reason the arabs hate Sharon has nothing to do with the Lebanon affair, no, they hated him long before. Because he was so fucking good at his job (defense).

    All the Arabs have to do, all of them, is to say

    a) you can be there
    b) we are not going to go to war with you
    c) lets work with you to make this place a better place to live.

    This is called normal relationship between neighbors.

    They have with the sole exceptions of Egypt and Jordan, refused to do this. In Jordan it is illegal for an arab to sell land to a jew. Not to an israeli, but to a jew. Same is true in Saudi Arabia. Then again, you can't even get in there if you are jewish. Egypt seems to spontaneously jail israelis. Lebanon jails you if you visited israel and attempt to visit them.

    So explain this to me (and the world then). Why the fuck should we not be paranoid? In 50+ years of existance as a state, our neighbors have done everything they can to destroy us, stopping at almost nothing. Saudi Arabia effectively tanked the world economy through OPEC http://www.2facts.com/Ancillaries/index/h02400.asp because it was pissed off at the war results and the support of the US and the Netherlands.

    To this day, you hear Kofi Annan criticize us whenever we respond in a very measured manner against the twits who so desperately deserve to go to Allah for taking out our children on busses, while he and the rest of his hoard are deathly silent when one of the aforementioned twits does infact take out a bus load of kids.

    You see resolutions get introduced into that most "unbiased" of all bodies, the UN, which uniformly criticize us for building a defensive shield against attack, yet are (again) deathly mute on the attackers.

    And to this day, we have to listen politely to assholes who frankly don't know any better make some of the most silly accusations about land grabs, offensive actions ...

    Get a freakin clue. Paranoids have enemies, and ours surround us. They show up and kill our children, introduce resolutions, and get otherwise reasonable people to think that we (the folks on the recieving end of the sharp point for 50+ years) are the aggressors.

    As for WMD. Would Hamas, IJ, or any of the other crazies stop for a second to carry out a super massive "operation" against us using one of them? Hell no, they would be fighting each other for the "honor". We can NEVER let them, or their sponsors get to that point.

    Guess what. The world is a dangerous place. We live in a dangerous area. We have neighbors who wish us only death and destruction, and help those who criminally perpatrate that stuff. We have a world council innured to the reality, a UNRWA which aids and abets the murderers. No where in there do we have any credible offers of peace. So when someone says "settlements are offensive", well, what the fuck can you do? Obviously that someone does not have the slightest clue about the history, the conflict, or what the real issues are. They just like the "underdog" and root for them.

  195. Re:I guess when you have suicide... MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you build your Mosque on the historical and archeological site of another religious institution? Well if you were civilized, you would not. You would respect the other folks rights.

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/printer-friend ly .asp?ARTICLE_ID=31203

    http://www.har-habayt.org/

    Such is life. The victim goes on being blamed....

    http://www.cronaca.com/archives/001504.html

    This is like a soap opera. You cannot believe this crap. It is amazing.

  196. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by mirko · · Score: 1

    o you want us to go back to the old indefensible positions, which invited our "friendly" arabic neighbors to attack en-masse?
    Israel actually stroke preemptively.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  197. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. Would be crazy.

    Nothing like that did happen. This is a complete distortion of reality.

    The whole of the middle east was "owned" by the Ottoman empire. The Brits carved it up in the late 1800s and early 1900s after WWI. The Zionist movement has been always an inclusive movement, never a racist movement. Zionism is simply about gathering Jews back to their historical homelands, from which they have been in Diaspora for thousands of years. It was agreed post WW-I that this would happen, and partitions in the middle east were made specifically to accomodate this, without excluding anyone else from living there. Same with the other partitions.

    Along comes WW-II, and a massive resurgance in antisemitism. 6 million of my co-religionists were killed, for no reason than they were my co-religionists. 6 millions Gypsies, gays, and other "undesireables" were killed by the same regime. Nationalism is dangerous when it finds scapegoats. Nazis had jews. Curiously enough, so do the Pan-Arabists (Ba'ath party folks).

    Ok. Shoah is over. Lots of my folks are sitting in camps in various locations. Antisemitism is still rampant. The Palestinian mufti collaborated with the Nazis and the folks who drew up the partitions prevented many of my co-religionists from escaping Hitler. Fine. They died. Can't undo that. What to do with the rest? Well, we still have that large mass for Israel.... well no. You see, during this time, some thief of Amman rode in and demanded 80% of that partition.

    Oh shit, we only have 20% left, since we caved on the other 80%. So who did that 80% go to? The Palestinians? Really? And what did they create? Transjordan? Oh.

    Ok, so we have 20% left for the jews... right? Well no, as the local arab population are doing all they can to drive the jews out. Lets see... jews were in Hebron (it was a jewish city) for 2000 years. That is until the massacre in the 20s, when the Pals slaughtered men women and children. Made all the papers. They fought the boats bringing us in. Claimed we would take "their" land. Most of the land was unclaimed and undeveloped.

    You keep hearing about the green line, right? Well that was the line dividing the jewish property from the arab property. The jews worked the land very hard, and made it produce. Their side of the fence was green.

    Ok, so here we are, in 1948. Finally, the UN votes to allow the mandate to form along the boundaries that the jews agreed to from the UN (they didn't like them, but they agreed to them). The arabs rejected it. The day Israel was declared, this tiny nation was invaded. On all fronts. The purpose was to kill the jews and drive them into the sea.

    Needless to say, this war was very costly, and it did not succeed for the aggressors (the arabs). As a result of the war the arabs had told the palestinian arabs to leave their homes to get out of the way so the soldiers could kill more freely.

    Well, it didnt work out. So all these folks who fled are in camps. Bummer. They left voluntarily, in order to help an enemy. They gave up their rights. Anything else is fiction.

    The armistice was supposed to end hostilities.

    Didnt work.

    They invaded again. And again.

    And again.

    Notice the pattern?

    Oh,... forgot to mention the 600-800 thousands jews living in arabic lands forced to leave from 48-mid 50s. They were forcibly ejected, without due process, without compensation. No one asked them to step aside and return owning everything as the Pals were asked.

    After the last invasion, caught with their pants down, the jews decided to build some defensive border positions called settlements. They are military forward observer and occasionaly real defensive positions.

    During all this time, the arabs have refused to allow the pals to integrate, leave their camps, become citizens.

    There is precisely one country in the mid east where pals have any sort of political voice, rights, etc. Any c

  198. Re:who the heck modded this "flamebait?" by admbws · · Score: 1

    This is one of the reasons why I read at -1 (the other reason is because I like it!). In flame wars like this, the most unpopular opinions get modded -1, Flamebait (aka -1, Unpopular), whilst popular (and usually also incredibly illinformed) posts get modded +1, Insightful. Such as this post - from a person unable to even spell Palestine correctly. (We'll forget the fact that this entire thread should really be modded -1, Offtopic!)

  199. You missed the really big story here by fidros · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This statement came out only after the Israeli government effort to help organise and partly finanace a Sun, IBM & Israeli Open Source activists project to drive Hebrew and Arabic support to Open Office became a success with the results showing in version 1.1 - the first stable penOffice version that supports Bidi languages (Hebrew & Aarabic) in a close to decent way.

    Forget what they say about the reasons for this move and look at the facts - this is a premeditated move and a damn smart one.

    I just wish other givernment would be as smart.

    --
    Gilad.
    1. Re:You missed the really big story here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has BiDi been patented yet ? Don't tell me - SCO has the patent ;-)

  200. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    israel is simply in defense mode.


    I suppose Hitler was too...

  201. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was any other country with similar or worse human rights record, say Sudan, people would be rejoicing at their rejection of MSFT. But Israel bashing is just too chic these days.

    That's because you'd think Israel has all that's needed for human rights where as Sudan doesn't.
  202. Stating the Obvious by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    But someone could make KDE support Hindi by either doing it themselves or paying someone to do it themselves. It's Open Source.

    In the case of Israel, MS was offered money to add the support. Since it's proprietary SW, there is no way for anyone to do it his or herself. MS turned down the bespoke project. AFAIK, they never said, "Sorry, we'd need more money." They basically said fsck off, we're busy.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  203. Wrong direction, dudes by shachart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm an Israeli, and as such am more intimate with the details of the annoucement. What the Israeli government drives at here is neither a stab at Microsoft for lower prices, Hebrew for Macs, or anything of that sorts.

    What it drives for is open standards. Unfortunately, our economy is not too strong right now, and a when a poor fellow buys a computer, she cannot afford to pay another $129 on Windows, $200 on Word, or $300 on Office, which accumulates to (almost) more money than the hardware itself. She can install Linux, and will be able to use OpenOffice, of course. But what about opening Hebrew word files? No luck there.

    As part of a cross-government effort for open standards (see some government sites for documents), they also drive for open standards. If pushing MS to do so by not buying their software anymore will accomplish that, then I salute 'em... :)

    As for Linux penetration here in Israel, I can say it is no lesser than the situation in the US or Europe. No Munich yet, but we're getting there...

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    1. Re:Wrong direction, dudes by jo42 · · Score: 1

      In Israel, fellow == she???

      Must be too many Russian immigrants...

    2. Re:Wrong direction, dudes by shachart · · Score: 1

      Do you have a feminine equivalent for "fellow", you vocabulary-nazi, you...?
      If so, I would gladly adopt it.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
  204. Re:What about Jordan? by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    "No product may be built, partially or entirely, in Israel."

    Yeah, you should get all your products made in Cuba, since the US is not a racist country, and if they didn't like Fidel Castro's policies they would never do a racist thing like impose an embargo on another country...

    When will people learn, a country is not a race!

    And if you were a real businessman you would know about the US denials list, which is a long list of individuals (and some countries) with whom the US doesn't allow technology companies (like IBM) to deal. Or has that system been changed recently?

    Since USians probably think Saddam started Bush Gulf War 2 by sucking those bombs into his country from the US airforce, no doubt you think Egypt started the 1967 war by sucking Israeli bombs onto their airfields.

  205. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    Gross body counts are MEANINGLESS.

    That depends on your philosophy. Enlightenment philosophy might include Utilitarianism, i.e. that ethics is based on the greater good for the greater number of people; that is based on ends rather than motives.

    Previous (e.g. Greek) philosophies might be that your place in the hierarchy is important, and that what a King says gets written down, but what a peasant does is not important. Hollywood is very keen on this philosophy - that whoever is arbitrarily defined as the good guys will win and that the bad guys get killed without trial.

  206. oh well. by eshefer · · Score: 1

    I appriciate your points, but they extreemly nitpicky.

    remembering the question I was unswering (regarding the hebrew language as a secular language) - your points are, at best, irrelevant.

  207. More Info (Re:More than just convenience) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hi,

    Sorry for posting anonyously. Lost my /. account ages ago.

    My name is Shachar Shemesh, and I'm involved in the Hebrew OpenOffice effort, as well as having some intimate knowledge about the events described above.

    First - a correction. Adhering to the US settelment with MS was not something forced on MS by Strum. It was an agreement entered between Strum and MS some five years ago or so. In exchange for this agreement, Strum agreed NOT to declare them a monopoly.

    The thing that brought this business forward was a legal action taken by a forum called "Freedom to choose" against Strum and the Israeli MoF, trying to force Strum to declare MS a monopoly. As a result, the agreement was suddenly published (it was kept a secret!). As an indirect result, MoF suspended it's agreement with MS.

    Strum claim, by the way, is that MS is not a monopoly, as MS Israel is not selling to the Israeli market. MS products are sold by vendors (HP, IBM, etc.), who buy it directly from MS US. I can't even begin to describe how flawed I personally think this argument is, but that's a matter for a different article.

    In an unrelated issue, the MoF is also financing an effort to add Hebrew support to OpenOffice. Participating in this are Sun Israel, TkOs (Tak Open Systems), Netmask, and myself as a representative of an NPO called "Hamakor" (I'm vulenteering, most of the rest are paid by MoF). As a result of this (as well as Sun Hamburg work on the matter), OpenOffice 1.1 will have pretty good Hebrew and Arabic support (not perfect, though). The Hebrew export and import from Word are not as good, unfortunetly. I'm hoping they will get better over time (the plans are laid out, they just need to be carried out).

    Regarding the fonts and spell checker - Sun has bought about 5 fonts with Hebrew support, for use with OpenOffice (no mistake here - that's OpenOffice, not Star Office). They are not free (as in freedom), but they are free (as in falafel). There is also work to integrate a free software project called "hspell", which is a Hebrew spell checker, into OO. That, too, will take a little while longer.

    Background:
    • hspell home page
    • Hamakor's home page (most of it in Hebrew)
    • The "freedom to choose" forum has no home page that I could find, nor does anybody seem to know who is financing it, or what's it's exact charter. MS is claiming that it's competitors are behind it, but IBM, Sun and Oracle categorically deny it.


    Who ever heard of an anonymous coward signing?

    Shachar Shemesh
    Open Source Integration and Consulting
    Hamakor board member

    P.S.
    Does anyone know how to recover a lost /. ID based on email address?

    Sh.
  208. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by nordicfrost · · Score: 1
    All the college students bitching about the Jews really need to watch out. Western Europeans have a dangerous pogrom tradition that goes back 1000 years. It's a serious case of glass houses.


    Well, my heritage chose not to be mean to the jews so I'll have my two cents here as a member of one of the few European peoples that were nice to the jews through history. No glass houses here.


    This sentence applies to both the palestinians and the israeli: What the hell are you doing?!? This moronic spiral of violence is instigated by your leaders and fanatics. Not you.


    That was the mandatory voice of reason. Now for the solution: Israel; get the hell out of the UN-defined borders and while you're at it, stop executing people with apaches. Palestine, get your police off their fat asses and arrest the key instigators before you collapse in civil war.

  209. Re:Microsoft, don't take more crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hebrew is the National Language of Israel
    Hebrew is one of the National Languages of Israel. The other one is Arabic, which enjoys Israel's support of OpenOffice, too.
  210. Re:GPL - Source Posted by arendjr · · Score: 0, Troll

    Israel's politics are responsible for 9/11, according to Bin Laden.

    At least we know on whose side you are.

  211. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but there's just no way this makes sense. Blaming an individual for the acts of their ancestors is nothing short of lunacy.

    Noting that a culture was once twisted into something evil and could possibly be again is moderately acceptable.

    But there is a difference between saying "The cultural and political climate in Europe is showing signs of the insular racism that led to Nazism in the past." and saying "Your grandparent was a Nazi, and you could turn into one ANY SECOND."

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  212. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by BlameFate · · Score: 1
    Not necessarily:

    Israeli soliders in tank takes out Hamas terrorist camp - Palestinian casualties guaranteed; Israeli casualties not guaranteed.

    Palestinian terrorist takes out bus full of schoolkids - Palestinian casualty guaranteed, Israeli casualties guaranteed.

    Therefore, the use of *themselves* to blow up Israelis leads to a factor that increases their casualty numbers which is not present in the Israeli figures.

    --

    --is not to be confused with user #672982 - Bame Flait

  213. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Zeriel · · Score: 1

    If I had mod points, I would mod you up. That is the single clearest and most complete summary of Israeli history I've ever read, and every point you made is truth.

    I'd friend you, too, if you weren't AC.

    --
    "America has done some terrible things. But I know that Americans don't cheer when innocents die." -Dave Barry
  214. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by HBI · · Score: 1

    But there is a difference between saying "The cultural and political climate in Europe is showing signs of the insular racism that led to Nazism in the past." and saying "Your grandparent was a Nazi, and you could turn into one ANY SECOND."

    OK. I'll accept it's a little unfair. I agree with the previous statement regarding the political climate in Europe incidentally. However, I will say that the unctious sanctimony of the Europeans regarding the affairs of Israel reminds me of the behavior of ex-smokers who decry smoking in their presence.

    I'll also admit that I just don't like Europeans in general. I have a bias. I used to like them too. The last 10 years have been very destructive to my opinion of same, and the hypocrisy on the Israel issue is just the tip of the iceberg.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  215. Mod parent up by haggar · · Score: 1

    Excellent post, thank you!

    --
    Sigged!
  216. However. by Kickasso · · Score: 1

    Mac is is still strong in Israeli academic world, and absence of Hebrew is a pain.

  217. A reaction to CheckPoint? by grue23 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is in part a response to the U.S. Government's policy to not use some Israeli software products. In particular, I am aware that they refuse to use Checkpoint for security concerns.

  218. AFAICT by Kickasso · · Score: 1

    with X11 it depends on your XKB setup. You should be able to type nikkud with ctrl+numbers in any application, but I had little success with KDE apps. Will try more...

  219. Yes, I do.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Feature management is a very, very simple concept. You look at what percent of your customers are demanding this or that feature, and what bugs are affecting X percentage of your customers, and make your decisions about how to allocate development resources from there.

    You are correct, only when applied to poorly designed systems and/or poorly managed operations.

    In the admittedly uncommon world of truely considered software practices it works more like this...

    You look at the potential profit a feature will bring. If positive profit, you promptly FIND the resources.

  220. About TIME... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About TIME my hard-earned hard-paid-for taxes are spent more wisely in Israel.

    I can only imagine how the Microsoft dependency feels for an Israeli taxpayer.

    (Go ahead, mark me down as Troll... I know were not "supposed" to complain that more US tax dollars go to Israel than all of sub-Saharan Africa -- plus Afghanistan, combined. Sorry, I'm all out of Soma...).

  221. Solution: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pay for the privelage. Have those users absorb the additional cost required to add and support their demand for Hebrew in mac word. If Israel balks, then raise the price of word for all of Israel to cover the expense. If Israel balks again, then what they're doing is demanding preferential treatment as then they'd be insisting the rest of the non Hebrew world help shoulder the burden.

  222. Stupid question if you please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Um, for the benefit of readers who are too lazy to investigate for ourselves, and since you seem to know so much, does it accept entry in Hebrew right to left, (as language was meant to be written and read before someone came along and started reading and writing backwards, of all things!) or would I have to type backwards (that is, left to right, as Hebrew is written and read right to left) ?

    In short, if I want the output to say:

    "Hear O' Isreal, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one"

    (in Hebrew, of course) would I have to type

    "eno si droL eht ,doG ruo si droL eht ,laersI 'O raeH"

    instead? Hmmm?

    ~Ya'akov

    P.S.: For the two or three people reading this page who don't already know, the sentence above is called "the Shema" or simply "Shma", and is basically a univeral Jewish prayer... in phoenetic Hebrew, it's "Shema Y'isroiel, A'donai Elohaynu, A'donai E'chad!" (with the e and ch in E'chad pronounced like "eh" and the ch in "Bach", respectively. Have you prayed to your God today? :-)

  223. Apple software to PC by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1
    I don't see Apple porting it's software to PC.

    Actually, they do. Not just Appleworks, but all the iTunes stuff too.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  224. let them hire an US LINUX company to meet that! by urbieta · · Score: 1

    any US based linux company may be contracted bt the israeli gebernment and tell the US they are still doing good things with their money ;)

  225. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong on number one. Aggressors NEVER give back land taken

    Please, get you facts straight since June of 1967 Israel has OCCUPIED the original Borders of the Palestine state.

    Today not only does Israel OCCUPY Palestinian land, but encourages settlement of jewish Israeli's on these lands

    While in Occupation of this so called democratic country, Palestinians suffer without having any political say in the Israeli government, suffer from lack of clean water, livable conditions in the Gaza Strip are horrendous, despite the support of many human rights organizations their efforts however, have been continuously blocked by the State of Israel.

    Historically speaking, it is Israel's land and there is no such thing as a Palestinian. there is also, BTW no such thing as a Jordanian either, according to your line of reasoning. Jordan was made by the U.N. "Palestinians" are Jordanians, ,and Jordan hated them and still does. Even tried to kill them.

    Wow!?!? You really are confused aren't you? Those little Israeli tourism pamphlets you've been reading aren't very historically accurate. Saying that Palestinians don't exist is like saying Native Americans don't exist either. True, as with Native Americans in the pre-Colonial days, The Palestinians did not have a "Nationalized" Identity in the European since. Present day arab Nationalism was a European concept introduced in the Middle east from colonialism which of course is no different than present day Israeli colonialism.

    However a majority of the Inhabitants (who call themselves Palestinian) of this land converted to Islam 1400 years ago, Thereby adopting a "Muslim" Identity and implementing Arabic culture and language. This however does not justify taking someone's home and prompting a forceful relocation of 8 million Palestinian Refugees in other Arabic nations, when in fact they have lived on the land what is now known as Israel for Thousands of years, and have always had a localized "Palestinian" Culture.

    They are merciful enough to only destroy the homes of terrorists and their activities. Of course, the Israeli-hating-terrorist murtderous liars also destroy... blah, blah, blahblah blahblah, blah.

    Ahem, Spoken like a true sincere human being.

    all those homes that are bulldozed are all terrorist? Hmm the BBC and most internationally focused news agencies reports differently, just one example

    Israelis attack military targets and go out of the way (which they should not) to avoid civilian targets. Your friends the lying murderers nearly always target the innocents.

    Dead wrong. Everyday Israel just can't avoid civilian targets

    Thus the continuous occupation, oppression, and destruction of Palestinian children and THEIR land and now you have Israeli citizens that wonder why their homes and way of life isn't safe anymore? hmmmmm.

    Why does Israel even put up with these animals?
    They're u go bro...you Represent your israeli folk well why your safe and sound in your american home, what's the matter dude? why don't you go to Israel and live there? Scared?

    However, more and more average working americans themselves are becoming aware that Israel has become a liability to our country, with 3 billion (soon to go up) a year "official" Tax support for the Israeli occupation, in the face human rights, 30 UN sanctions, growing worldwide (not just middle east) anti-american sentiment because of it's relations with Israel. Israel does nothing for the United States, Economically, Politically, and diplomatically except lobby for more money. I say stop the support and use that money on more important things like our children's future education and healthcare.

    In the end who

  226. Windows had support for Hebrew before Apple by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    "Although Apple has provided operating system-level support for Arabic, Hebrew, Urdu and other right to left languages since the release of Mac OS X 10.2 last year" It doesn't say much about Apple if they only started Hebrew one year ago. I do remember reading about right to left support available in Windows a long time before this. Was it even in Windows NT? I don't remeber.

  227. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by mr100percent · · Score: 1
    "Besides the fact that Sharon accepted the road map..."


    He accepted it with 16 "reservations". He flat out refused to follow certain parts, saying the Palestinians had to do their end first, and they had been already. So the Palestinians had to put away all their guns, and maybe the Israelis would pull their tanks out if they were lucky.


    "Try looking back to the July 2000 Camp David summit between Clinton, Barak, and Arafat. When Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered Arafat 96% of what Palestinias claim they want, including a Palestinian capital in parts of Jerusalem, rather than accept or even come up with a counter-offer, Arafat refused the offer and left the peace talks."


    That's a huge load of propaganda. Look at the reality of Barak's 'generous' offer


    Oh and by the way, the Palestinian Liberation Orgranization PLO, was founded pre-1967 and their charter calls for the destruction of Israel so don't go thinking this is about borders.


    So what, in 2000 Arafat accepted and officially recognized Israel. At the same time as the PLO made those former statements, Prime ministers said the following:


    "There is no such things as a Palestinian people... It is not as if we came and threw them out and took their country. They didn't exist." -- Golda Meir Statement to The Sunday Times, 15 June, 1969.


    "In our country there is room only for the jews. We shall say to the Arabs: Get out! If they don't agree, if they resist we shall drive them out by force." --Professor Ben-Zion Dinur, Israel's First Minister of Education, 1954 from History of the Haganah.


    I don't believe the textbook thing anymore. It's been propaganda for sooo long. After the Oslo accords, they're supposed to recognize Israel. Show me proof.


    I never implied that Hamas or Islamic Jihad were interested in a two-state solution. They're not running Palestine. Part of Hamas wants a two state plan, but the other part rejects it, however.


    Give me the rundown on the Oslo accords then. Israel destroyed and shut down the Palestinian police force. Did the accords say something about stopping settlements or right of return?

  228. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh, homicidal children. Yup. What weapons do they have again? Rocks? How did they die? Bullets? Hmmmm...

  229. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    I'm quite sick of how when a Palestinian gunman kills 3 Israeli soldiers, it's Terror (which it is), but when an Israeli tank kills 6 civillians, it's an Error, an accident, a mistake. Remember when the Palestinian firemen died putting out a fire because Isreali troops opened fire on them? There was even a video of it.

    My point is that both sides feuding are practicing terrorism. Neither can claim higher moral ground on this.

  230. Tech Support Call in Ancient Egypt by duck_prime · · Score: 1

    TS: Hierakonopolis Software, may I help you?
    User: I'm having problems with In-the-beginning-was-the-Word 5.0
    TS: What is your problem?
    User: I type for a little while then the screen locks up.
    TS: Did you try to hit ctrl-alt-eye-of-horus?
    User: Yes, I keep getting the lapis-lazuli screen of passing-to-eternal-reward.
    TS: Maybe you're short on RAMses.
    User: I'm not a newbian! I think there's a main system chariot interrupt conflict.
    TS: Reinstall and pray.

  231. s/better/later/ by randomencounter · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's a nit, but I just had to picket.

    --
    Forget diamonds, copyright is forever.
  232. Fonts, Fonts, Fonts by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Windows metrically equivalent fonts

    Cigar time. That is the one key most signifant practical barrier to widespread adoption of Open Office.

    If metric equivalent fonts, especially non Latin fonts, were widely available, there would be a tidal wave of OOo adoption.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  233. The Jews need to get with the program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For starters, the agreed upon language of the coming New World Order WILL be English. Any other language will be useless, and superfluous. Even God uses English now.

    Switch, or perish. It's as simple as that.

  234. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by ralian · · Score: 1
    the Inhabitants (who call themselves Palestinian) of this land converted to Islam 1400 years ago

    Dude, there WAS no Islam 1400 years ago. Check out a Muslim calendar.

    --

    -raph

  235. Re:I guess when you have suicide bombers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are invited for a week to israel.
    I wonder if you will think that way after you leave...

  236. Re:no harder than the bidi languages it supports n by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Chinese and Japanese are left to right, and I beleive that the Mac version of MS Word does not support Arabic either.

  237. Re:fuck you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Israel is not nearly as bad as other places out there, why is it dominating UN discussions?

    Maybe because they keep ignoring the UN resolutions? :o)

  238. Re:Frist Post by SpongeScrodSpareCock · · Score: 0

    Damn you must be getting the paid, ad-free version of Slashdot. Better broken ads than any ads at all.


    Is j00r keyboard sticky from w4term3llon j00ce niggerboy....? What nonsense j00 type

    --


    |*l33z kOm3nT in m4h j00rnehl