Slashdot Mirror
Taipei 101 Now World's Tallest Building
mstamat writes "A 101-storey skyscraper in Taipei is from today the world's tallest building. The new scyscraper is 508 metres (1,667 feet) tall, beating the 452-metre (1,483-feet) twin Petronas towers in Kuala Lumpur. The full height was achieved after adding a 60-metre (197-ft) spire on top of the building. The story is on
Reuters." There's plenty of information about the building available.
..is like sticking a toothpick on my dick to gain that extra two inches. Not very fair huh?
I don't understand why adding a pole or whatever to the top of the building means it's a bigger building. How about if they just made a really big pole, would that be the new biggest building in the world?
I have over 70 freaks, do you?
are you naturally that much of an idiot or do you have to try?
I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
Am I the only one who thinks spires shouldn't count? I think it should be the highest floor of rentable, realistically usable office space.
Am I wrong?
I would like to note that the CN-tower in Canada at 553m is the worlds tallest free-standing building, and still is.
On Skyscrapers.com it says 'The final section of the spire was put in place October 9, 2003, thus giving Taipei 101 the official world's tallest building title.', yet at the top of the page it says: Year (end) 2004, how come?
I have over 70 freaks, do you?
It appears this Corporation has been set up specifically to construct the building, but I wonder whether they will be operating it in the future?
I have over 70 freaks, do you?
...or is it silly to include a spire making up about 12% of the length? Ok I know they'll find "creative" ways of not making it a spire etc., but still... Antennas don't count, so why should spires? The way it is, they're practically non-working antennas. Though they can't actually use them as such, because then they'd lose the record, wouldn't they?
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Please don't reproduce. Oh wait, no danger of that...
Each elevator is designed with an aerodynamic body, pressurization and emergency braking systems, and the world's first triple-stage anti-overshooting system. The cost for each elevator is over $US 2 million.
Um, what is a "triple-stage anti-overshooting system"? To keep elevators from going past target floors?
John Kerry is a Joke!
I noticed this in downtown Brussels: tall town houses, built for the rich burghers of the early 20th century. _Tall_ houses, with first floors way too high for times without good insulation or central heating.
And interestingly, the heights of the buildings correlate with the dates of construction: the first houses on a street are modest, then each new construction adds a little to each level, just enough to appear more important without being vulgar. When the street is full, the last construction is the most impressive, it towers over the older houses.
Of course then the whole community runs out of cash and they have to live in the cold drafty boxes they built.
I detected a similar pattern in medieval castles, and this scyskraper (sic) is a good example of the same principle at work today.
Basically, it's a bunch of boys comparing penises and sticking penis-sheaths onto them to make them look longer.
Bon amusement, mes gars!
Ceci n'est pas une signature
If however architectural spires were not included in the height either, the Sears tower (excluding aerial) would be far taller than the Peronas towers (I am not sure about Taipei 101 however).
So in answer to your question, adding a pole to the top of a building doesn't make it a bigger building. To improve your buildings height you must add a spire (i.e. a real fat pole that serves no particular purpose apart from aesthetics). The rules are stupid, I know, but then again, I didn't make them up, and at least they stop people from using carbon fiber rods to cheat.
When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
They most likely think of the Empire State or the (now disassembled) Twin Towers as the largest. Nitpick all you want. If it made it, it made it. At the first to break a half km, it deserves some respect.
The Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur. The reason why they held that title for so long is that Malaysia is a Muslim country...
Also, any odds on how long it'll be before they're flying helicopters around this
Around?
We should immediatly suspend all building projects higher than 60 meters. The risk of terrorism is just too great.
As well we need to halt all distribution of Linux since it clearly infringes on SCO's IP. The risk of law suits is just too great.
While this is likely the world's tallest skyscraper, the tallest man made structure on the planet is the CN Tower in Toronto, Canada. It has been the tallest since 1975, too.
:)
As an aside, i cannot stress how freakin cool it is to stand on the glass-bottomed lower obsevation deck, and peer down at the city nearly half a kilometre below.
You mean a .. city?
- Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
To quotem :
:)
www.great-towers.com/eng/towers/torontoindex.ht
The CN Tower opened in 1976. It is the world's tallest building and freestanding structure tower, at 1,815 feet (553 metres), it reaches more than one third of a mile into the clouds. The seven-story sky-pod features indoor and outdoor Observation Decks that include EcoDek, a new interactive environmental attraction opened in December 1994, the world's highest glass floor, at 1,122 feet (342 metres), Horizons, the world's highest bar, and 360, the world's highest 400-seat revolving restaurant. In addition, for those who want to go even higher, we have our space deck, at an altitude of 1,465 feet (447 metres). It is the world's highest public observation gallery in the world.
508 meters !> 553 meters
It's still damn tall though
Haven't we learned anything of World Trade Errors?
Just a joke. Taiwan has been in race with China for years. It's interesting to see this news right after China has finished a manned space mission.
So... if I add a 504m spire to the top of my house, I'll be able to beat them? Better not waste any time then...
http://www.skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?1178316.
That thing is so big, it needs a separate weather forecast for the upper levels.
Die First, Then Quit
A scyscraper is a skyscraper _without_ a spire or antenna.
Change the rules to include poles et al.
Then next time OBL decides it would be cool to fly a jumbo into the worlds tallest building, he'll get there and be like "dang, it's a two storey with a 5000m flag pole!"
Taiwan, which lies on a seismically active stretch of the Pacific basin, was hit by an earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter scale in September 1999. The tremor killed more than 2,400 people and destroyed or damaged 50,000 buildings.
I find the best part is the high risk of earthquakes. Could you possibly try to temp murphy any more.
-People who live in glass houes should not throw stones
30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
Score:5, Troll
Sorry, but you can tack on a radio tower and claim to have the "tallest skyscraper." IMHO, it ain't the tallest unless you're comparing height from lowest occupiable space (sub-basement) to highest occupiable space (penthouse floor). Spires are mere decoration and airplane hazards.
What is your Slash Rating?
For much of human history the church (insert local flavour here) has been in control and in many places they had edicts that no building could be taller than the local church, mosque, temple etc. So the hight of the spire becomes a serious issue.
Just a Thought.
K
Be wary of strong drink, it can make you shoot at tax collectors and miss.
CN Tower, Toronto Canada. The CN Tower is 553.33 m (1,815 ft, 5 inches) tall
The CN Tower is just the world's tallest free-standing structure. There are numerous radio towers that are higher, including one in Fargo, North Dakota of 2,063 feet.
"Just a hint, we are not all that stupid over here. After all we managed to put a couple of dudes on the moon, how many times has your country gone over there.... eh?"
Sure.. Read the Moon Hoax
anyone out there who can shoot some decent photographs ? The stuff on reuters is tiny. The Other link has onl y3 pictures which do not really depict the size of the construction... It doesn't seem all that huge.
When will I end this grieving ? When will my future begin ?
Really people, it IS a concern
the WTC was built to withstand a 737.
Hopefully the designers have learned from recent tragic events. I'm curious, how much destruction can this new wonder withstand without risking lives?
And it better not be (WTC++)
For what it's worth:
Taipei: 508 m (1,667 ft)
Kuala Lumpur: 452 m (1,483 ft)
Toronto: 553 m (1,814 ft)
Chicago: 412.4 m (1,353 ft)
The new plan for rebuilding the World Trade Center in New York includes the 'Freedom Tower' (estimated date of completion: 2008) with usable space up to 341 m (1118.8 feet)
Main roof: 541.3 m (1,776 ft) - 1776 being the American year of independance, no coincidence
Spire: 98.8 m (324 ft)
Height with spire: 640.1 m (2,100 ft)
every stain tells a story
Aw man...
Not a redneck AGAIN!
I'm really tired of using MS BOB
It seems that 60% of the top 10 Official World's Tallest High-rise Buildings are in China (Republic of China + People's Republic of China) and 80% of those Top 10 buildings are in Asia.
London's pathetic attempt to build one small Hong Kong style building is amusing in a sad kind of way, but 'brilliant' might be going a bit far.
Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
Racism on /. is simply shameful.
For the record, most structural engineers who work on very tall buildings (yes, I'm one) tend to take the view that its habitable space that matters - but having said that some large spires are accessible with observation decks and whatever so these would probably count too. There's a fair bit of difference in the amount of engineering effort required for these than for some carbon fibre mast stuck on top for bragging rights.
All generalisations are wrong... including this one.
You know what, I don't give a crap about spires. Stand on the Top floor of these cheating "tallest buildings" and then stand on the top of the Sears Tower...People standing on the Sears Tower would be looking down on the people on the other buildings.
Case closed.
Who made up these stupid rules anyway?
"Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
The Taipei 101 has a pendulum-style damper, I think. I wonder how it's controlled if its motion is detected as contributing to oscillation rather than dampening it?
Interestingly, the spire has its own TMDs. I guess I'm a TMD kind of guy: there's something suitably retro about dragging 800 tons of stuff up as high as possible, simply to have it wobble or slide around.
and at least they stop people from using carbon fiber rods to cheat.
Wow! Did you actually get to see the rod?
I moderate "-1, Fool"
When that goes up (or comes down from orbit, or whatever) won't that blow all the records out of the water? Or would that not count as a building? Though certainly not as an "office" building. ("Our building is half a mile high" "Yeah? Ours is 40,000 miles high...")
They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
I read some newspaper article about this very thing years ago (maybe when those towers in Malaysia opened?). At some point in the past, a group of architects (I don't remember the details) agreed that the height of the entire building, including ornamental spires would be used.
Granted the largest structure in the world still remains the CN Tower in Toronto.
I felt almost empty inside, seeing an article on slashdot that did not mention how this relates to the war on terrorism.
I could imagine posting anti-terror operatives on the observation decks (or tying one up in the speir), to "track terrorist movement" in the city below. But no, no mention on how this great tower would relate to fighting terrorism.
You, my friend, introduced the subject in this fine discussion. I am now a whole being again. Thank you so much!
and building space stations...
Ideally, we would just get even drunker and put a man on a mars, but, we have this stupid war on terrorism...
This is my sig.
So, we build this huge thing, and a hundred years later it gets old, starts having structural problems, develops a huge crack, or whatever, and we need to demolish it. Now, how do we do that?
For example, look at what happened to the towers. They fell down pretty much as nicely as they could, and they still created a huge mess, and tons and tons of dust, some of which included asbestos. And cleaning up the remaining rubble was estimated to take years as well.
I'm curious about how those buildings are going to be destroyed when they can't continue standing anymore.
lol... man, you spend WAY too much time on here... lol!!
Karama Whore... LOL!!!
Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
Until the Petronas Towers were built, the Sears Tower in Chicago held all four titles. Petronas displaced the Sears Tower only by virtue of an enormous spire, which was part of the architectural design but did not actually have usable space. Thus Petronas got a boost to its Structural height by virtue of its spire, but the Sears Tower actually remained the leader in Highest Occupied Floor, and Roof, and Tip. Unfortunately, Structural height is the one used in the public domain to assert the title of Tallest. You can see that the Sears was taller by far in every intuitive sense of the word by looking at this scale drawing. And the illustration actually omits the Sears' antennae masts.
Don't blame me - I voted for Howard Dean. http://dean2004.blogspot.com
1815 feet 553 Meters http://www.cntower.ca/
I hope so, if their concept of a "tallest building" includes the toothpick-like antennae.
The true question:
is the 448m roof of this new tower higher than the CN Tower Skydeck at 447m? If floor(447) is higher than topfloor(Tapei101), then IMO the highest still is the CN Tower (even if it's not considered a true building by charts).
have you been defaced today?
The cynics and muckrakers of /. are out in force this week. Nothing gets by them!
Anyway, the sucker's huge. You can see it about 20 km away towering over the mountains that normally block the entire cityscape of Taipei. If you're in Taiwan, you can see it from Freeway 3 just before Tucheng. It's amazing. And the antenna on top is puny in comparison with the rest of the building... trust me.
No one seems to have mentioned that Taipei is in an earthquake zone, a very serious one.
The poster needs to learn how to type. Looks like Engrish to me.
This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
CN tower is definitely the "world's tallest building". http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/index.asp?id=4 9675
.... that the one upmanship in tall structures seems to be isolated to Asia now?
1815 feet 553 Meters http://www.cntower.ca/
Well, at least Guinness didn't...
I awlways enjoiy a storey submitted by a gud spellar.
I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
Isn't that the same building where Neo will meet Merovingian? It was the 101st floor after all. I always wondered where I could meet that hot blonde. Gotta run to Taipei. See ya.
There ought to be some requirement that only habitable are counts towards the tallest building. To hell with spires and radio towers.
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
For those of you who skipped structural engineering lots of information on damping systems is available here especially the two "technotes" papers 1 and 2.
I think the article said it was an 800 ton damping system; it doesn't suggest how much the building will weigh but that second paper shows that even a 2% mass ratio can signficiantly reduce vibrations in the building.
I wonder if the esteemed Dr M believes that it is another Jewish conspiracy.
What is the inverse of the Matrix?
Where did the submitter learn to spell?
"In a cat's eye, all things belong to cats."
Does everybody else think the International Finance Center in Hong Kong hereis modeled after what I think it's modeled after? To quote Shrek: "Maybe they're trying to make up for something."
"Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney
Actually... they've just announced plans to include a broadcast tower, which will expand the tower's height to as much as 2100ft!
WTC TOWER WILL NOW TOP 2,000 FT.
At some point in the past, a group of architects (I don't remember the details) agreed that the height of the entire building, including ornamental spires would be used.
If this rule was applied to the Sears tower as well, then it would still be taller than the Kuala Lumpur towers. For whatever reason, the spires are counted on those, but not on the Sears tower.
I'd like to draw your attention to the Empire State Building because it was completed in 1931, decades before most of these other buildings were even thought of, decades before "modern" skyscraper architecture and engineering. It still ranks as one of the tallest (and most famous) buildings in the world over 70 years later.
-Thomas
Islam is a religion, not a race.
CN Tower, Toronto Canada. The CN Tower is 553.33 m (1,815 ft, 5 inches) tall
CN Tower still is the tallest free-standing structure, but was never the tallest building. Buildings have usable floors all the way to the top. The CN tower does not meet this qualification.
Considering the building was being designed probably 10 yrs ago and was already under construction on 9/11/01 I doubt the plane crash scenario was given much thought. The WTC was built to withstand a 727, which was a 1960's era 4 engine jet, much smaller and slower than the 757s that hit the WTC. A 737 is a "baby" jet. Of course there is the 747, C-5, C-17 and some other large Russian jets which are monsters and I'm not sure you could design for a hit from on of these. Maybe there is a super-secret anti-aircraft missile system installed to prevent crashes. I'd be more concerned with a large earthquake or super typhoon causing problems. Taiwan has both of those with some regularity.
For whatever reason, the spires are counted on those, but not on the Sears tower.
Communication antennae, like those on the Sears tower, are not counted towards the total height of the building. However, ornamental spires, like those on the Petronas Towers are counted.
According to The Guiness Book of World Records, the tallest building is 553.33 metres or 1815 feet, 5 inches tall. By my calculations, this is taller than the building in the article. Blame Canada.
Aleks Oniszczak
VividPicture.com/aleks
Yeah, because they really need a "safe passage" to get into a country that is currently hosting some 5 million illegal immigrants, has a rampant illegal weapon and drug trade, and has counterfeit documents throughout the globe.
a new place to throw pennies/spit from.
Go blow your fucking head off, loser. And, we should leave the world in the charge of nice, rational, peaceloving people... like you?
Taipei 101 is still taller than both of them, sirrah. It is the tallest from ground to spire, the tallest from ground to roof, and the tallest from ground to highest floor.
Also, the spires on these buildings are decorative in nature. The antennas on the Sears tower are not. If a spire adds to the overall design of the building, then I think it is fair to include its height. I think we should still distinguish between usable height and decorative height. The latter characteristic should probably be decided on a case by case basis by a group of architects.
Pax Digitalia
THEN THE ONE MENTIONED HERE ISN'T, EITHER: "The full height was achieved after adding a 60-metre (197-ft) spire on top of the building"
Correction, "all the way to the top, which may include an ornamental spire." I was talking about the difference between a structure and a building.
I wouldn't be too happy about working in this monster (or any other skyscraper). 9/11 showed the need for work on ways to get people out of skyscrapers quickly in case of a major fire or other disaster. Just yesterday 10 people (I believe) died in a high-rise fire in Chicago; they were found in a stairwell, and apparently died of soke inhalation. I don't think I would work in one of the upper floors unless I were able to keep a parachute in my office.
This post is dedicated to all of those
1) there will be a 800 ton spherical mass damping system to minimize sway. between a restaurant level and an observation deck near the top, exposed for our viewing pleasure. i will most def. be there to see it..
2) fastest elevators in the world. upwards 60km/hr, downwards at 48km/hr. (any idea why down has a lower limit? safety?)
3) double deck elevators. i'd like to see neo break out of this one. a first too.
4) and by the way, 448m roof is > 447m roof of the sears tower. this is most definitely taller.
5) finally, i see the sears tower everyday. it's kinda ugly...pretty refreshing to see this bamboo-inspired design.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
Seems odd that it happened to be exactly 1,667 feet... like maybe they added a little bit extra to get past that 1,666 mark.
Actually, 1,666.7 is more accurate, I think. (that is, if it is exactly 508.0 meters) If you round off to the nearest whole foot, the guy that builds one at 1,667.2 is gonna get short-changed.
-Major Kusanagi, Section 9
It's the difference between a spire and an atennae. While the former is an ornamental structure which counts in heigh, the latter is a functional structure which is disqualified. It's a foolish rule but is explained well by abde's post above, though I suppose in the end, all that matters is one's own personal view since the rules are all pretty subjective concerning building height, or even the definition of a building.
...and I suppose that Marge Simpson, what with her huge blue bee-hive, must be the tallest person in the world. Hair counts for height, right? Can't disqualify her just 'cause she's a cartoon. No, that would be alot of Yank whinging.
My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
It's like this: If Billy the cashier at McDonald's works 6 hours everyday, does he only get paid minimum wage * 6? No, you have to factor in the number of days. And if he wears a spire on his head, he'll get paid even more!
-Major Kusanagi, Section 9
Parent posted to World's 10 Tallest Buildings which shows pictures of all 10 buildings (including Taipei 101) on a ruled page that shows the height in meters.
The graphic is very pretty. It also shows that only the Sears tower has a full floor over 425m. And that if the permanent antennas were redefined as spires, it would still be the tallest.
US are #1! I mean, we are #1. I mean, well, I am not an architect or associated with the construction industry in any way, but national pride says we are still the highest (in every sense of the word.)
I spend my life entertaining my brain.
The CN tower is once and for all the world tallest free-standing...
TOURIST TRAP!!!!
Have you SEEN what they charge for an elevator ride to the main observation level. And then another ridiculous amount to take that crappy little elevator to the groddy little top observation deck which really isn't any different from the main level cause you're already so high up.
The "glass" floor in the main observation level is kinda cool though. 342m (1,122 ft) straight down beneath your feet. Acrophobics beware!!
If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
no fair! you peeked!
Trigger-happy hackers from the "real world" shooting out support cables and taking wild rides upwards grasping tight, shiny leather-clad babes whilst mumbling about the non-existence of certain pieces of cutlery.
If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
Yes, and I have spent time doing business in Taipei. My understanding is that there is a big likelihood that there will be an earthquake larger than 7 on the Richter scale. Not only that, but I doubt their ability to know every technical problem of having an earthquake of 7 on the scale.
The article says, "Some have worried that the building would be dangerous in earthquake -prone Taiwan. But the skyscraper's developers have said the closest fault line is 660 feet from the building, and the fault hasn't been active in 45,000 years."
This is utter nonsense. An earthquake does not need to be close to a building to destroy it.
Earthquakes close to 7 are not rare. The Bay Area quake was 6.9. California is part of the same earthquake system, the Pacific basin.
The site that has images of this new building, this"Skyscrapers.com" holds the rights to the images of the new buildings. All of the images bear the warning:
The image above is for internet viewing only, and may not be saved outside your browser or used without a license. However, you can buy usage rights if the image belongs to our staff.
So whatever you do kids! If you're a windoze luser, PLEASE make sure you don't accidentally fullscreen the browser window, and make sure your cat doesn't unwittingly stand on the keys RIGHT ALT+SHIFT+PRINT SCREEN and then shift feet to stand on CTRL+V while you have, say MSPAINT open. That image might end up in an unauthorized area! Also, be careful as a mac user that you don't let your fingers (unintentionally, of course!) stumble across Command Key+4, and if you do make sure the marquee doesn't stray into the protected image! You want to make absolutely sure that if you want to look at these pictures outside your browser window you'll do the right thing kids! Pay the licensing fee!
Quod scripsi, scripsi.
While the former is an ornamental structure which counts in heigh, the latter is a functional structure which is disqualified. It's a foolish rule but is explained well by abde's post above...
That makes sense, I suppose.
Taking this to the ridiculous, wouldn't the building itself be functional, hence exempt from measurement?
Since only ornamental features count, I declare that nothing but garden gnomes and lawn flamingos shall ever count for the tallest anything.
and they'll tell you what the tallest building in the world is: the Sears Tower. It's stupid to say a 101-story building is the tallest in the world when the Sears Tower has over 110 floors and the highest occupied floor in the world at 1,450 ft. Anyone from Chicago can tell you these shoddy knockoffs are just that.
Coicidentaly, I went to the Sears Tower Skydeck (the observing floor on 103) and their informational video actually had pics of the Kuala Lumpur towers. One of the narrators (an animated bird) asks the other, "But what about those towers in Malaysia?" and was of course brushed off with, "Well, if adding some sillt piece of masonry can get you a title, let them have it. We know we're truely the tallest."
Also of intrest, I remember when the Kuala Lumpur towers were finished and the owners of the Sears Tower (don't remember if it was still Sears at that point) looked into adding two or three 'dummy' floors, which would be all that was nescesary to beat the Kuala Lumpur towers. Unfortunatly, with the Taipei tower 'officially' measuring over 1,600 feet, that'd be a few too many dummy floors.
But anyone from Chicago can tell you why these imitations don't measure up to the real thing.
-Trillian
When will they realize that engineering and architectural marvels aren't what real power is all about.
I mean, who needs to go to space and build great things and such when you can blow all of your country's money killing, destroying, and generally pissing people off...all while mispronouncing simple two syllable words? Now that's how to build a legacy!
Just an interesting tid bit I found on the SkyscraperPage.com. The International Space station is 99 Meters, or about 1/5 the height of the tallest building in the world. The top is quite a bit taller of course.
:o)
Gives new meaning to Thoreau's "If you have built castles in the air, now put the foundations under them."
http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?b21790
I live in Taiwan. Taipei 101 makes me ill everytime I look at it. The building is a government-financed feel-good project to enhance the nation's prestige. Unfortunately, except for the government-owned stockmarket, the office tower has attracted no tennants willing to sign a lease. Backers of the project claim that the seven-storey shopping mall is leased - of course, they don't like to mention that it's in another building. This thing is going to go spectacularly bankrupt soon after it's finished. By the way, nearby Sungshan Airport had to re-route it's flights to avoid danger to the office tower.
Because it is a tower and not a skyscraper?
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
Good thing I browse /. from home, or I might have been nailed for that.
This post made with the Dvorak layout.
"Friends don't let friends use QWERTY"
And what's the difference between that and a building that only wins because they stuck a silly spire on it? (The CN tower is a building with restaurants and elevators and all sorts of tourist junk in it.) IMO, either it should be the highest occupied floor with a certain minimum area (in which case the Sears tower wins), or the tallest free-standing structure with spires and whatnot included (in which case the CN tower wins).
I find your blatantly Islamophobic attitude to be disgusting, and unworthy of a science and technology oriented news site.
Hmmm, so how was the original post blatantly islamophobic, as you say?
Like what I said? You might like my music
So now, when somebody jumps, instead of making a "splat" noise, they make a "SPLAT!!!" noise. Right?
hey!
So get on with it and celebrate this new achievement.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
OH, but what about the world's tallest freestanding bell tower, 160 ft. (49 m), in good old West Lafayette, Indiana. You can't forget about that. Just forget about who has the largest, who has the biggest. Worry about the things that matter, such as incompetent leadership. Yes, I am a citizen of the US, until I finally get away from this shit-hole, and no we didn't choose that asshole, we chose the other one.