Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.2 'Rudi' Beta Released

An anonymous reader writes "The beta of the next version of KDE, billed as 'the premiere Open Source desktop', has been released. Read the announcement at KDE.org. Notable features include a big clean up of the interface and menus, Improvements to KHTML from Apple, better accessibility and hardware support. There are also new applications such as JuK (a music player similar to iTunes), KDevelop (a graphical IDE), Kontact (an integrated communications package like Outlook) and more. Download it here and since this is a beta, report any problems or bugs you have." Also, nukem996 points out "The counter-terrorism unit on TV series '24' went KDE this season, too."

468 comments

  1. hmm how long until? by Shakrai · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    There are also new applications such as JuK (a music player similar to iTunes)

    Hey, if 24 has embraced it, how long until Apple itself does?

    Way to go KDE!

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:hmm how long until? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interestingly, Marshall on Alias(ABC) uses KDE most of the time(seems to alternate between version 2 and 3), but nearly everbody else uses OS X. I recall having seen several Snow iBooks in the SD6 hardware as well.

    2. Re:hmm how long until? by pacc · · Score: 1

      KDE must be a good non-commercial alternative.
      Using iBooks and OSX is just smart product placement on the same lines as the strange overwheight of newly polished GM or Ford cars in a single movie.

      For this season Fox has swithed from iBooks at CTU to Dell laptops - but since Microsoft probably isn't part of the advertising deal KDE could be the neutral choice.

  2. Premiere Glue! by GaelenBurns · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why does everything have to be PREMIERE? I swear, it's been 5 years since anything mediocre was released. There must be amazing advancements made in every field on a daily basis.

    1. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Mediocre" was already taken by Gnome.

      (Sorry... sorry... honest... I'm sorry...)

    2. Re:Premiere Glue! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 0

      And why 'premiere' and not 'premier'?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Premiere Glue! by GaelenBurns · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're foreign.

    4. Re:Premiere Glue! by ENOENT · · Score: 2, Funny
      I swear, it's been 5 years since anything mediocre was released.

      Yup, nothing since Windows 98. (It's follow-on didn't quite meet the minimum requirements for mediocre...)

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    5. Re:Premiere Glue! by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Mediocre" was already taken by Gnome.

      You mean "gmediocre", right?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod this one up--that's great! 20 SECONDS????!? My question is why!?

    7. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Mediocre" was already taken by Gnome.

      You mean "gmediocre", right?


      ... now in .NET flavour!

    8. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the correct terminology is "GNU/Mediocre."

    9. Re:Premiere Glue! by chowells · · Score: 1

      It was a typo I think, I've just fixed it in any case.

    10. Re:Premiere Glue! by stilborne · · Score: 1

      premiere is a valid spelling, at least according to Webster's and WordNet (ah, dict:premiere) .. i suppose it was just a bit of my Canadian showing through, eh ... ;-)

    11. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear, it's been 5 years since anything mediocre was released.

      It's been five years since the last Win9x release already?

    12. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. The most natural name then, would be Kmediocre

    13. Re:Premiere Glue! by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Funny

      no. We have moved beyond k*. Now, it would be medioKre (I am a kde developer, so just a joke).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    14. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish we could rate comments as "6". Well done!

    15. Re:Premiere Glue! by Deusy · · Score: 1

      He certainly didn't mean the unavailable "medioKre".

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    16. Re:Premiere Glue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can at HuSi. [Scroll to bottom.]

  3. KDevelop has been around for a while. by Captain+Tenille · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it should be more clear and say that the beta of KDevelop 3.0 is out now, perhaps?

    --

    ------------
    /* You are not expected to understand
    1. Re:KDevelop has been around for a while. by SteamedPenguin · · Score: 1

      Which version? KDevelop 'Gideon' is also in beta for version 3.0

      --

      Dixi et salvavi animam meam

    2. Re:KDevelop has been around for a while. by fmileto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not sure if they are talking about "gideon". More importantly Gideon rocks, I love this thing just pick your app(kde, embedded(qtopia),etc..) and code. cvs built in, konsole built in (so I can run strace/gdb), your a click away from autoconf...automake and a number of other functions that make time for me to write more bugs^H^H^H^Hcode. Anyway I'm still running 3.1.2 and beta of KDevelop(Gideon) but imho this is the killer app. Thank Linus^H^H^H^H^Hgod for the KDevelop team.

    3. Re:KDevelop has been around for a while. by rastos1 · · Score: 1
      I played with gideon in last days and it really looks good. But I have problems understanding how you add GUI components to a KDE application. The Qt Designer (a cool thing of it's own) creates a skeleton for Qt application but not KDE. Though KDE classes are derived from Qt, it still is not very intuititve. I'd appreciate any hints.

      What lacks in Gideon is the help system. There are many pages which are more advertising than a step-by-step tutorial. Unless my memory plays fools with me, I think that there was more usefull stuff in 2.0.

    4. Re:KDevelop has been around for a while. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Use kdevelop to create a new .ui file. (File->new file->ui file or something - it's been a long time)

      Then edit the .ui file in qt designer (when you click on it to edit it, it should ask you - you may need to set the mime type correctly). Then edit it in qt designer, and save it.

      If you google for "kdevelop qt designer" you'll find lots of guides.

  4. Where I'd like to see KDE improve by FreeBSD+Goddess · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I like KDE - and I do, I use KDE - there's plenty of times I find myself needing to use non-KDE apps such as Openoffice, Mozilla, and others to do the things I need to do. The interface for KDE is easy enough to use and powerful enough, after many years of development, that instead of adding eye candy, it would be more worthwhile to improve the included applications. I like KDE, but there's still room for improvement. Unfortunately, I don't think the KDE developers are as much concentrating their efforts on the areas that need it. Note that I think KDE is also already more useful than Microsoft Windows, because it looks better, it's more secure, and the included apps are far better than what you get with a Windows installation - unless you want to pay a few hundred dollars for MS Office and the other apps you'll want.

    --

    SEARCHING FOR SIG
    SIG NOT FOUND ERROR
    READY.
    1. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by borgboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Saying KDE is more secure than Windows is like saying a Goodyear Eagle GT (tire) is faster than a Ford Mustang....

      Did you mean to compare KDE to the Explorer shell + various native win32 widget APIs?

      --
      meh.
    2. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by FreeBSD+Goddess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was mostly comparing the KDE apps to the comparable Windows apps. I'd say, for example, it's a safe bet that Konqueror is much more secure than Internet Explorer.

      --

      SEARCHING FOR SIG
      SIG NOT FOUND ERROR
      READY.
    3. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already apparent that the guy has no clue what he's talking about.

    4. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any pics?

    5. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a clueless faggot. Fuck off and die, nigger.

    6. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Carewolf · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually the security problems in Windows lies in the applications (Internet Explorer, Outlook, Office) and not in the otherwise excelent NT-kernel. That ways is compares perfectly with KDE (Konqueror, KMail/Kontact, KOffice).

    7. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Err, uh, I don't know squat about KDE's internals, but I know that the win32 APIs(Template Libraries) can both be busted open pretty badly to get System access, and evidently the flaws in them are unfixable without breaking compatability.

      So, any app you run on a windows machine could root the box. Shatter attack, yada yada.

      However, running KDE under a non-privaledged user, you can't have the box rooted that way.

      This of course is in no way what the grandparent was talking about, because he's an idiot.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    8. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      faggot

    9. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by swillden · · Score: 2, Funny

      Saying KDE is more secure than Windows is like saying a Goodyear Eagle GT (tire) is faster than a Ford Mustang....

      So you're saying I can run KDE on Windows and get improved security? Or are you saying that Mustangs are slow regardless of what tires you put on them?

      I'm confused...

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    10. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by p2sam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interstingly, one CAN run KDE on Windows...

      http://kde-cygwin.sourceforge.net/

    11. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet again I have to say, this further demonstrates the complete cluelessness of moderators here on /.

    12. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the security problems in Windows lies in the applications (Internet Explorer, Outlook, Office) and not in the otherwise excelent NT-kernel.

      ho-hum ... can you say 'kernel-level exploit'? I knew you could :-)

      and to give some examples (anyone screaming troll?), look at the privilege separation (rather the lack of it) in the message-passing system. remember that stupid (and i mean really stupid) bug when you could combine a nice buffer overflow with a rogue wm_timer message to gain system privilege? ms denied it until it rolled a silent fix ... in the last round of SPs, actually. or the set of kernel-level exploits that (afaik) still circulate for the original win2k? that's the 'excellent NT-kernel' for you.

      judging from the reluctance MS has in releasing *cough* 'some core parts of the OS' under sharesource ... you got the picture. some MS guy let it slip a while ago that if people got to see the internals of the message-passing system the whole MS security thing would go up in flames. but maybe it's just hearsay and we're all nice and cozy in the good ole NT-kernel world.

    13. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by chundo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd like them to stay out of applications completely and focus on providing the integration mechanisms that would allow Mozilla and OpenOffice and others to work together seamlessly.

      -j

    14. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Shatter Attack" required the end user to run a window as the SYSTEM user. It does not work with "any app".

      The author even stated that he belived the same thing was possible under X11 if you were to run a program as root.

    15. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by stilborne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > that instead of adding eye candy, it would be more

      > worthwhile to improve the included applications

      if you read the release announcement and/or actually try out 3.2, you'll rapidly discover that there is actually very little new eye candy over 3.1 compared to previous releases and that the vast bulk of effort for 3.2 did go into improving the included applications.

    16. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it requires a window somewhere on the desktop running as system, which, scarily, can be a lot.

    17. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct that there's been quite a few "kernel patches" in various MS updates, even though they aren't advertised as such.

      However, by far the most costly and dangerous vulnerabilities in Windows are the e-mail worms that exploit desktop integration features in Windows - the unholy trinity of IE, OE, and WMP.

      There's absolutely no evidence that KDE is any better in this regard, as it uses an integration design copied wholesale from Windows. This has already caused problems -- such as launching Virus EXE files from kmail using Wine, just like Outlook.

    18. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean the "old" NT or the new and *improved* XP with the big hold in the driver department?

      Anyone know how much of the 3.51 code is still used in XP? Just currious.

      kc

    19. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      it's a safe bet that Konqueror is much more secure than Internet Explorer

      What makes you think so? Because no hacker want to spend days to design a virus for a browser used by 1% of the people on the internet?

    20. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Telex4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You didn't actually mention where you'd like to see KDE applications involve. Nevermind :)

      Still, if you have feature requests, why not post them to KDE's bugzilla? I've got several features included in KDE 3.2 this way. If your feature is stupid, or not something the developers of that particular app think should be implemented, you'll be left wanting; otherwise, given time, developers will usually get around to implementing it.

      It's actually really quite important that users do this, otherwise KDE will only develop in the direction that the developers and distributors want to take it.

    21. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. There's a couple poorly written virus checkers, and that's it.

    22. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a well informed heterosexual. Please stay here and live forever, whitey.

    23. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by the_consumer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Woah. They're up to 1%? Cool.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    24. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 0

      Then perhaps you can explain the meaning of the phrase "root-kit" because I'm fairly certain it's not a kit that must be run as root to give you root access ;->

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    25. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by stilborne · · Score: 1

      yes, thoughtful, clear and detailed feature requests filed on bugs.kde.org are quite useful. as you note it doesn't mean they'll show up in a future release for a certainty, but they will at least be considered. if someone else has already asked for the feature(s) you were thinking of, you can also vote for that report causing it to rise up the list =)

    26. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Existance of them is the biggest reason I can think of not to run sendmail?

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    27. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 0

      I'm fairly certain it's not a kit that must be run as root to give you root access ;->

      Actually, that is exactly what it is. It is a kit full of modified executables that hide the fact that a box has been rooted (i.e. 'ps' that does not show a trojan running or 'netstat' that hides connections on certain ports or certain IP addresses). It may also contain trojans, backdoors etc... But in order to get it installed, you have to "root the box" first.... unless everything on the box is accessible to all....

    28. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought apple had 5% of the market?

    29. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has around 3% of the market, but good thing that many web designers use macs* :-)

      (*and thus is likely to use Apple Safari, which in turn uses KDE's KHTML widget)

    30. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by tuber · · Score: 1

      It also helps that Konqueror isn't built into the kernel of the OS....

    31. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by tuber · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're not just fairly certain, you're fairly wrong. Root kits are run after a hacker has gained root access.

    32. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or are you saying that Mustangs are slow regardless of what tires you put on them? Yup. Death to automatic-tranny girls-love-it-cause-its-cute pos slow as shit will-lose-to-any-Camaro-unless-you-spend-5-digits- soupin-it-up Mustangs! F-Bodies forever!!

    33. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      Because it's harder for a cracker to write a virus for Linux than for Windows. Because you have to be an idiot let someone's executable run in Linux with root permissions.

      Don't thank KDE, though. Thank the guys that came up with UNIX. Viruses would be tougher than they are now in Windows, too, if MS didn't have you using it as "Administrator" by default because they think you're too stupid to create a user account.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    34. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Because it's harder for a cracker to write a virus for Linux than for Windows

      It seems to me root exploits are more than occasional under Linux these days. Warnings & patches are issued at approx the same rate as under windows. That has to mean something.

      To get back to the subject, Konqueror, do you really think some crackers has already tried to write a virus for this marginal web browser? What exactly would be the point? Crash a 100 browsers? Whan you can write a virus for IE and crash 1 million in a few hours!!!

      Let's make my point clear. I don't know if Konqueror is more or less secure than IE, but obviouly, so far, very few have tried to exploit it, so I guess nobody knows.

    35. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1

      1) Root exploits aren't viruses.
      2) If they tried writing a virus for Konqueror, they would find it a lot more difficult due to Unix being much more virus-resistant by design.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    36. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      1) ok, but if there is a root exploit, there is room for a virus to use it.
      2) You limit your own definition of a virus to: A program that will get the root privilege. We've seen recently a bunch of viruses whose only purpose was to share/download files from the internet. Whether it is for DDoS or sharing child porn, these kind of viruses doesn't need a root privilege and I don't see how the so called "UNIX architecture" is protecting the end user against that, so if you can enlighten me...

      At least the machine is not screwed you'll tell me, but only the user space. sure, the virus is still there up and running however.

    37. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by DrPascal · · Score: 1

      I mean this post in the utmost respect, but this type of logic about the rootkits never made any sense to me. Can someone explain it?

      Sure, someone with root can really destroy a machine. However, the data that I -CANT- get back is in /home/myusername. All of that is available to be deleted or wrecked upon the crashing of an app running under my name. Wouldn't a program running under your name do as much damage to -things you care about- as a program running as "yourusername" ?

      --
      DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
    38. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by myklgrant · · Score: 1

      I agree. As a windowmanager/desktop KDE is the best there is. As a collection of apps (k-this, k-that) alot is left to be desired. I use KDE as a desktop but not many of their apps since there are much better choices (XMMS, Firebird, OO, Bluefish) available. I wish they integrated better with the desktop.

    39. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      A root exploit is usually caused by a buffer overrun. Software that uses a port that happens to be open might have a buffer overrun, in which case someone else can feed the software packets larger than what it "expects," and that leftover data in the packet can get executed.

      Viruses work in a variety of ways, but most of the time, they don't enter Windows through a root exploit. They can be an email attachment, embedded in a video or picture, etc. In Windows, most users are running as the Administrator, in which case if they're foolish enough to run an untrusted piece of code, or start watching the wrong video, once code gets executed, it automatically has Administrator priveleges. If it doesn't, the fact that Windows message protocols don't carry with them permissions structure, as they do in Unix, getting root priveleges is very easy.

      Code executed by a non-root user in Linux cannot do much to gain root access, because the Linux knows that the code is being run with user priveleges, not root priveleges.

      Microsoft has since patched their end of the problem, but as another person in this thread mentioned, they covered it up for months. Microsoft high ups have testified in court on several occasions that software design flaws exist in the Windows codebase (including NT) that cannot be fixed that could compromise the security of any Windows computer connected to the net. Not only does the Unix architecture strictly limit what code run by users can do, the response from Open Source projects when discovering security issues is faster in almost all cases, and, well, no one has anything to hide.

      That is beyond the scope of my original point, but I thought it worth mentioning.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    40. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      You can back up your data. In fact, you should be backing up critical data anyways. Companies are worried about getting taken over because they down want certain data to leave the company, and also losing uptime means losing money.

      For home users, actually getting a virus, or getting exploited, is not nearly so much of a problem, unless you lose data. Hence, back it up :)

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    41. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      isn't that what I just said??

    42. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Not to mention:
      • A DDoS attacker doesn't really care which user it's run as.
      • An email virus merely needs access to your MTA, not anything special
      • for i in .profile .login .xinit .xsession ; do echo "exit" >$i ; done
      I think the real reason Linux hasn't been targetted is that most people, including the virus-kiddies, run Windows.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    43. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      it's a safe bet that Konqueror is much more secure than Internet Explorer.

      My bicycle tied to the gate with a piece of string is more secure than Internet Explorer.

    44. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by bigbadwlf · · Score: 1

      they think you're too stupid to create a user account.

      Most average users are. Most don't even know what a user account is. Most don't know what Windows Update is. While they all know what a virus is, most are confused when you use the distinction, "worm."

      Sorry, it's beside the piont, but working in tech support I'm constantly reminded of these things.

    45. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      When you give tech support, then you deal with our nation's stupidest.

      Windows could, by default, just ask for a user name and password. Then, create two accounts with the same password, one as "Administrator" and the other as the user himself. Then by default you run as the user. Of course, whenever something needing root priveleges comes around, it will ask for his password for verification. The user will think "oh it's asking me for my password again. Well, I'll just type it in." In actuality, he'll be giving superuser priveleges to a program that needs it.

      Sigh, perhaps that would only create new problems. I dunno, I'm pretty dumb when it comes to Windows.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    46. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      A root exploit is usually caused by a buffer overrun

      Thanks, I know. The point I'm trying to make is that there is A LOT of root exploits for linux (and its daemons, drivers et al). A lot of systems out there are not necessarily patched accordingly, because some lazy sysadmins might rely on the fact that their network or computer is behind a firewall, or just because they are too busy to patch their Linux servers/workstations every other week. A virus coming from Javascript flaw, an email attachment or anything else could very easily use one of these to gain root access. Granted, it is still more complex than in a windows environment.

      Back to my point, why would a virus want to gain root access? In some cases, I can think of some need, but in most situations, like trojans, DDoS viruses, etc... The virus is happy just running, it doesn't necessarly need any specific privilege to proliferate on a network through a smart scan of the address book and the network paths attached to the computer.

      For the speed at which MS patch their security holes, I don't really think Linux has anything to say over Microsoft. They might be slower on some cases, but they are faster on some others, and are generally very good. This is of course to be moderated by the fact that the inherent flaws in Windows will never be patched of course...

      But to get back to my original point, which was to compare Konqueror to IE, I still don't think anyone has enough information to assert anything about the security holes in Konqueror vs. IE. It might be harder for a virus to gain root access with Konqueror, but that has nothing to do with Konqueror, it is derived from the underlying OS.

    47. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      So you're argument is that since viruses can exist and proliferate without root access, the only factor in determining which operating system is more virus resistant is how resistant each one is to running arbitrary code (with or without priveleges)?

      Perhaps another wrench to throw in this equation is that Windows users are going to be, on average, less computer, shall we say, savvy? Nothting against them, I mean computers aren't that important, but one of the biggest components in spreading a virus is user gullibility.

      Linux users range from being somewhat knowledgeable about Windows but clueless at Linux to full blown pros. The most clueless among us will still have dealt with Windows and viruses at some point. Basically, very few Linux users will be gullible enough to perform many of the actions required to perpetuate many if not mosf viruses. So perhaps more than Linux being more "secure," or Windows being more popular, the biggest reason viruses exist on Windows is that Windows has a large userbase of people that will actually "fall for it."

      On a side note, Windows ActiveX componets make running arbitrary code (with or without priveleges) easy beyond imagination. There is no equivalent to this in Linux, and is just horrible design from a security standpoint (every Windows developer who works with ActiveX knows it too, or perhaps only the ones I've talked to.). Also, most distributions are set up, or can be easily configured, to automatically updating software (at least with security fixes).

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    48. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Uteck · · Score: 1

      You obviouslly have not tried the beta version yet. Gnome apps are included with the KDE apps now, and not hidden in a submenu. Not all of them, but some of the more populer ones at least.
      Kontact is nice, just like Evolution, but using kmail, kaddress, knotes, and korganizer in one interface. Use them together or seperatly. If I could get the Macs to connect to the kloab contact/mail server I would give it a try, but for now it only works with kontact.

      --
      no .sig found Please restart your browser.
    49. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by orcrist · · Score: 1

      My bicycle has never had a remote exploit despite not being secured or patched in any way :-)

      However, someone did gain physical access and hit me with a complete DOS attack :-P

      -chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    50. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by inquisitor · · Score: 1
      Functionality like this actually exists in Windows since Windows 2000 (at least); it just isn't automated yet. Try holding down SHIFT when you right click on an icon; this will produce a "Run As..." menu option.

      At this, some distros (eg. Mandrake) are much much better than Windows. The problems with doing this in Windows are basically that:
      • Most users HATE passwords. XP attempts to get around this by setting (by default) that you can't access an unpassworded account via a network, but it still lets you create one. This is entirely a usability issue.
      • There are a lot of dumb and/or older applications which require finely grained permissions; whilst current versions of, say, the Microsoft, Adobe or Macromedia suites store settings in %appdata% (not to mention Mozilla, Firebird and Thunderbird), older versions and/or badly written software may not. This would cause an absolute pain.
      • And, of course, something well-engineered like, say, Swen would easily bypass this. "Oh, look, it's a Microsoft Security Update. It looks professional enough. That always asks for my password when I've done it before." That's the problem with autodetecting stuff that needs 'root privileges', and the fact is that the time it would take to make up a list of 'OK Applications' would be far too long and cause *far* too many complaints, especially from the "Microsoft is evil" crowd. "Microsoft is deciding what I can and can't use! STOP THEM!!1!!11!"
      Pity, really; if it wasn't for the fact that Microsoft would recieve a huge number of complaints from the new and the clueless if they tried it, it would be a good idea.
    51. Re:Where I'd like to see KDE improve by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      What, NO NEW EYE CANDY? Screw it, I'm not getting it!

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  5. KDevelop by ItWasThem · · Score: 5, Informative

    For the record KDevelop is not a new application. Maybe the submitter was referring to the newest beta version being included in the KDE 3.2 beta?

    1. Re:KDevelop by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      /* For the record KDevelop is not a new application. */ KDevelop 3 is Gideon, a rewrite branch of Kdevelop and a huge extension. So it IS a new application. So soon there will be a mature IDE for Linux that is not called emacs. Lazarus, Hbasic, Gambas and all the other attempts for a modern IDE for programming languages are not ready yet.

  6. Last link is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last link looks /.ed, anyone get the article text?

  7. KDE on ./?? by JollyTX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hello... a KDE announcement on Slashdot? Cooool!! ;)

    Now that we've been politically correct for a little bit, let's go back to Gnome reporting.

    --
    Can you hear me, Major Tom? I'm not the man they think I am at home...
    1. Re:KDE on ./?? by Rumagent · · Score: 1
      Hello... a KDE announcement on Slashdot? Cooool!! ;)

      Now that we've been politically correct for a little bit, let's go back to Gnome reporting.


      Unfortunately you were not being politically correct, the proper etiquette dictates "Kooool!!", as it is well know that the letter "c" has become redundant and evil.
    2. Re:KDE on ./?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately you were not being politically correct, the proper etiquette dictates "Kooool!!", as it is well know that the letter "c" has become redundant and evil.

      you're late, dude - 'kool' became redundant about the 2.x release.

      also, leading 'C' might be regarded as redundant by some, but it's definitely not evil until it morphes into 'G'.

      so there. HAND.

    3. Re:KDE on ./?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately you were not being politically correct, the proper etiquette dictates "Kooool!!", as it is well know that the letter "c" has become redundant and evil.

      Gcool!

  8. superkaramba by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    anyone know if superkaramba will be included in this beta release or the next?

    1. Re:superkaramba by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I highly doubt it. SuperKaramba is a very buggie application that was written on a whim and not with much structure. Though it is very cool, it sure isn't ready for any form of the spot light yet.

    2. Re:superkaramba by chowells · · Score: 1

      Definitely not. It's debatable if karamba will ever be included in the "main" KDE at all, and the deadline for new applications in KDE 3.2 passed some time ago anyway. The only changes allowed now are bu g fixes.

    3. Re:superkaramba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No its not SK is not any buggier thana ny other applicationa nd it is quite well designed, please provide constructive criticisms for your trolling.

    4. Re:superkaramba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems really buggy to me. I was using one of the weather applets over dialup on Mandrake 9.1 and if I happened to logout when it happened to be trying to update (which is a pretty large window of time over a dialup), then it would crash. I got tired of having to restart it manually.

  9. Counterterrorists use kde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    cuz terrorists use gnome... this is a new phase of the kde vs gnome battle

    gnome, the new axis of evil.

  10. Take a look at the colours... by chendo · · Score: 5, Funny

    MY EYES, MY EYES

    Seriously, how did they build a good looking iTunes clone with THAT colour sense?

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    1. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Adrian+De+Leon · · Score: 1

      I wasn't the only one blinded by this web site then?

      On a postive note, the change from MP3 players molded after real world devices to players center on data(in this case the playlist) is very welcommed.

      FYI, I use rhythmbox on Linux. It is pretty good.

      --
      adl

      My boring ramblings
    2. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does colours have to do with designing KDE apps? As far as I understand in KDE ALL colours are user-defined.

    3. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Adrian+De+Leon · · Score: 1

      I think he means that neon green on the JuK web site that makes you want to peel your eyes off. :-)

      --
      adl

      My boring ramblings
    4. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      u apple hippies need to switch to windows like the rest of us. For a twenty five year old company like Apple, your market share really stinks. Apple should just become a x86 vendor, and port macosx to x86. Guess why Dell has a 30% market share in the US? BECAUSE THEY SELL F*CKIN AFFORDAIBLE COMPUTRZ!

      fukin niggers.

    5. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought a powerbook and ran mac osx for a while until i found out that I could run Linux PPC with KDE on it and still have the sex appeal of a powerbook g4! All things considered for my purposes kde on linux allows me to be a whole lot more productive than osx. I don't know where you get this professional programmers bit from when the same apple programmers use KDE KHTML in Safari?

    6. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, that's why Apple adopted the Javascript and HTML rendering engine from all of those "amateurs". For that matter, the core of their OS is based on tools by other groups of such "amateurs". That's right -- they dropped thier own OS to base it on all of this "amateur" work. Really insightful. ;-)

      And also note that many if not most prominant OSS developers are professional programmers, including most of the KDE team.

    7. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goggles do nothing!

    8. Re:Take a look at the colours... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      Well, you know hosting is expensive; I assume the author wants users to minimize the number of times they check the website for updates =P

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    9. Re:Take a look at the colours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a fag.

    10. Re:Take a look at the colours... by whynotme · · Score: 1

      Looks good to me... Ray Charles.

  11. RPMS by isNaN · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake users can download RPMS here:
    http://www.n9nu.net/linux/kde.php

    I have been using them since Friday and they work great!

    --
    No, i don't like sigs...
    1. Re:RPMS by iso · · Score: 1

      I don't suppose anybody around here has a Gentoo ebuild of 3.2b? :)

    2. Re:RPMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the official gentoo forums, it's sure to be up by now.

    3. Re:RPMS by stevey · · Score: 1

      Did I misunderstand? I thought the point of Gentoo was that everything was cutting edge and up to date?

      Can't you just download the sources and the old ebuild files and rebuild? Or is there more magic involved?

    4. Re:RPMS by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      strange... I get an "Unknown host www.n9nu.net" error for that.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    5. Re:RPMS by iso · · Score: 1

      Did I misunderstand? I thought the point of Gentoo was that everything was cutting edge and up to date?

      Well there is a KDE CVS version in portage, but I'd rather go with beta "release" as I've had the CVS version break on me.

      Can't you just download the sources and the old ebuild files and rebuild? Or is there more magic involved?

      More or less, but I can't really use the KDE 3.1 ebuilds as building 3.2 is different enough to be a pain in the ass. Which is why it would be nice if somebody else had already done the work and has an ebuild available. And that's why I was asking :)

    6. Re:RPMS by fault0 · · Score: 1

      It's already been in portage for a few days, actually. It's masked so you need to run emerge on it manually.

  12. One bug I'd like to see fixed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  13. Re:RudeE screenshots posted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's pretty funny. Pretty good shot of your a-hole too. It has that trademark leathery worn look of a Windows zealot's that's so accustomed to frequent Billy-bumpings.

  14. So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME? Or do I still have to pay the 4 digit price tag for a commerical QT DEV license?

    1. Re:So... by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 0

      That seems the bad news about QT, most small companies won't use it for their toolkit because of the licensing. It almost would make sense to re-implement it in an LGPL version for that reason. Maybe you could make it look nicer alongside GTK apps in the process.

      As a side note, KDE seems to have a less consistent and less friendly interface than GNOME. GNOME seems a lot more discoverable to me.

      --
      You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
    2. Re:So... by oGMo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME?

      No.

      And that's a feature.

      :-)

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    3. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it isn't.

    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME?

      Yes. It is perfectly possible to write GTK+ apps for KDE, just like you can for Gnome.

    5. Re:So... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Funny
      Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME? Or do I still have to pay the 4 digit price tag for a commerical QT DEV license?

      Can I use the fast, non-scripted close source apps that you build like I can use freeware? Or do I still have to pay some kind of price tag for an end user license?

    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That seems the bad news about QT, most small companies won't use it for their toolkit because of the licensing.

      C'mon -- that guy isn't writing "fast, non-scripted, closed source apps" for anything, he's just whining off-topic for the sake of making noise. Otherwise I'd point out that if he's actually planning on making money from these alleged apps the cost of a Qt license is a minor detail.

    7. Re:So... by stevens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME? Or do I still have to pay the 4 digit price tag for a commerical QT DEV license?

      Let me get this straight. You're complaining because you want to write closed-source apps (presumably for money, why else would you close the source), and TrollTech won't give you the library for free?

      How ridiculous. If you're in business, you're in business. Quit whining for handouts. You won't give away the apps you write, so why complain about others?

      One of the things I like about the so-called 'viral' open source licenses is that it creates a clear boundary between Free and non-Free. If you want to write non-Free apps, then get your hands out of the Free cookiejar.

    8. Re:So... by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Sure, go ahead and develop your app. When it looks like you can get some sales, the cost of a QT license will be trivial.

    9. Re:So... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Ironically Gabber's status icon docks on the latest KDE panel correctly and does not dock on Gnome2's panel at all, as far as I can tell.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact remains that he has an alternative. Therefore, he will choose that alternative.

    11. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it is. You will Have to Break free from the Torment of closed source ;-)

    12. Re:So... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The "feature" is that commercial entities cannot use the hard work of open source developers for their own profit, without giving something back.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, you've never heard of the Harmony project. I'd have included a link, but it appears completely dead and gone.

      The goal was to clone Qt for the reasons you complained about. When Qt adopted an acceptable license, there was no need to continue with the project.

    14. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No. I asked a question. I also fail to see why my simple question was moded down so much.

    15. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Yes, KDE copies GUI ideas from commercial entities all the time.

      Isn't that wrong also?

    16. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No. I asked a question. I also fail to see why my simple question was moded down so much.

      Maybe it's because you obviously already knew the answer. It was not a question at all; it was a smart-assed trollish effort to point out that Qt commercial licenses cost money.

    17. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, KDE copies GUI ideas from commercial entities all the time.

      There's a difference between copying the features or "look and feel" of a piece of software (application or gui) and taking the code for that software.

    18. Re:So... by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      No, you must pay before you develop, from what I remember.

    19. Re:So... by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

      there's also a difference between "taking the code for software" and linking to an open source library, which is what this discussion was originally about.

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    20. Re:So... by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

      You won't give away the apps you write, so why complain about others?

      He's not complaining about others "not giving away the apps they write" .. he's complaining about others not letting him use their libraries unless his app conforms to their ethical specifications.

      Even MICROSOFT lets people link to their core libraries free of cost or strings.

      --
      The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    21. Re:So... by unoengborg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you will also have to pay saleries to your developers. If you can cut down development time, you will not only save money, you will also get a shorter time to market.

      Normally, you would also have marketing costs that have to be paid before any gain can be made from your development efforts. These costs are normally way bigger than the cost of the QT-licnece.

      If you can't afford such comparably small fee as the QT licence before getting into a software project you should seriously think twise about what you are getting into, or try to get some kind of financial backing.

      --
      God is REAL! Unless explicitly declared INTEGER
    22. Re:So... by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      None of which invalidates my point, or has any real relevance to it.

      It does however stop the bedroom shareware coder big time.

    23. Re:So... by blackpaw · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Poll: 75% of Palestinians support Haifa restaurant attack: Respond or Ignore! Don't mod down.

      Well in recent polls 80% of israelis support bombing the crap out of the palestinians, not to mention the punitive closures, bulldozing, destruction of farmland, and checkpoints.

      Also 50% of israelis support ejecting the palestinians from palestine - ethnic cleansing. Thats also the offical position of the religious nutcase faction of the ruling government

    24. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Your post doesn't seem to have much to do with the parent

      2) Gabber docks great for me in Gnome 2.4. Anything that's freedesktop.org complient should pick it up.

    25. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      How is it copying if all I do is call the API and link to the required QT libs?

    26. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>> As a side note, KDE seems to have a less consistent and less friendly interface than GNOME. GNOME seems a lot more discoverable to me.

      From my experience (at my comp shop where we often demo alternative OS's), most users will gravitate to computers running KDE. It seems to have much better defaults than GNOME does. Keep in mind that most of these people are used to Windows.

    27. Re:So... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Linking to the code is no different, practically, than copying that code into your source tree.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    28. Re:So... by ryantate · · Score: 1

      Down modded? Looks like more narrow minded slashdot jihadism.

    29. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you desire the source code for these apps you are more than welcome to enter into an agreement that will allow you access to the source code, even the right to modify/distribute the code could be allowed.

      As to everything being free, well, my family has to eat somehow.

    30. Re:So... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      As to everything being free, well, my family has to eat somehow.

      Ok, but weren't you originally complaining about Trolltech's attempts to feed their families?

    31. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No. I wasn't complaining about anything. I was asking a question. A question that most for-profit software developers ask before they select a GUI platform for their linux apps.

    32. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you already payed for your window$ license...

    33. Re:So... by katz · · Score: 1

      >Well in recent polls 80% of israelis support >bombing the crap out of the palestinians, not to >mention the punitive closures, bulldozing, >destruction of farmland, and checkpoints.

      Oooh, can you lay on the moral equivalence bullshit any thicker?. Why don't you refine what "bombing the crap out of the palestinians" means in real-world terms? i.e., do you believe that the IDF attacks intending to kill as many men, women and children as possible? It's in all the Palestinian terrorists' sermons, news reports, and declarations of hatred against Israel. It's how they design their bombs: they dip nails and bolts in rat poison, and then pack them into belt bombs. When the IDF strikes, it kills a few people and that's it. Nevermind the fact that terrorists like to surround themselves with children for 'protection'. So don't peddle that moral equivalence bullshit to me.

      Punitive closures and checkpoints. What's there to understand? Palestinian terrorists are smuggled in taxis, buses, ambulances, and horse carts (carrying bombs in watermelons). Israel has to let these people in? That's what happens when Israel re-opens the closures; You invariably get well-padded "rabbis" exploding themselves among Israeli crowds.

      Destruction of farmlands. Same thing, big deal. Since it's a matter of making sure Palestinian terrorists don't penetrate Israel, then all the better if Israel has to level Palestinian farmlands to make fighter jet runways.

      >Also 50% of israelis support ejecting the >palestinians from palestine - ethnic cleansing

      you make two mistakes here. 1) there is no palestine. Nada. Nothing. It's not 'their' land, even. It's land that was legitimately conquered by Israel. Second, you're missing the point of security *again*. It's not a matter of ethnicity or rejecting ethnicity. It's a matter of preventing terrorists from entering Israel. Ethnic cleansing is when you kick people out (and kill them) simply because they belong to a particular group. Israel targets not the Palestinian people for being Palestinians, but individual terrorists as they present a clear and present danger to the security of Israelis.

      >Thats also the offical position of the religious >nutcase faction of the ruling government

      where's your source? Which "faction" are you quoting? (democracies have independent parties, not offshoots or factions. Example: Shas is a religious party. However, Palestinian government does indeed have "factions". Fatah has many offshoots. Several of them publicly state that their mission is to kill as many Jews as possible. Israel is looking out for her security; there's nothing religious about that. Fatah factions such as Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades promise young suicide bombers that they'll get their seventy virgins in heaven. So who's the religious nutcase?

      Roey.

    34. Re:So... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      I wasn't complaining about anything


      Yes you were, you just masked it as a "question". You knew the answer to your question before you even asked it. You just saw an opportunity to do some whining.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    35. Re:So... by RoLi · · Score: 1
      Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME? Or do I still have to pay the 4 digit price tag for a commerical QT DEV license?

      If you want to sell software and can't afford a 4 digit price tag, you better try some other business.

      For OSS and closed-source in-house applications, the GPL-version of Qt is just fine.

      The funny thing is that RMS himself was stating that gradually the LGPL libraries should be replaced by GPL-ones. Now all of the sudden the evangelists are concerned about closed source apps and say the GPL for libraries is evil-evil-evil, could you please make up your mind?

    36. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you make two mistakes here. 1) there is no palestine. Nada. Nothing. It's not 'their' land, even. It's land that was legitimately conquered by Israel.

      It's an empire now is it? In that case it can eat shit and die.

      Apartheid supporting scum.

    37. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you pay for your windows license and your visual studio license. Every time someone creates a must-have app for windows, MS sells more windows copies. Every time someone creates a must-have app with Qt, even though more linux copies sell, Trolltech doesn't see a dime on them.

      They're just trying to make money.

    38. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can. All kde libs are LGPL !!! Use WxWindows or other toolkit and write close-source apps for KDE.

    39. Re:So... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I will handle you last dig first. I have never claimed to be an GPL/OS 'evangelist', now have I?

      Or I can develope the apps for Gnome and use what I would have to pay for the QT lic for other business expenses. For a smalltime developer the four digit price tage of QT may be too big of a one time charge.

    40. Re:So... by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Maybe this is true for the Windows version, but I know you can download QT for Linux and start developing for free. When you're 'done', you get to choose: Release as Free software, or pay them for a license and release commercially.

    41. Re:So... by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      From http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/general.ht ml

      Q: Can we use the Free Edition while developing our non-free application and then purchase commercial licenses when we start to sell it?

      A: No. The Free Edition license applies to the development phase - anything developed without Professional or Enterprise Edition licenses must be released as free/open source software.

    42. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Flamebait modder has been meta modded idiot. Enjoy, cause I am enjoying it =)

  15. slicker by jaaron · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've always wondered about slicker:

    Slicker: A collection of utilities which provide alternative for our beloved kicker. Slicker consists of three primary items Cards, the Slider, and a Task-bar. Which can be used in conjunction with each other, and Kicker, or utilized by themselves.

    It always seemed like such an innovative idea, I'm surprised it hasn't ended up in the mainsteam of KDE yet.

    --
    Who said Freedom was Fair?
    1. Re:slicker by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not ready. Not even it's backing developers are suggesting inclusion in KDE yet, so it is not up for discussion.

      I am smugly waiting for the kicker vs slicker vs .*karamba war for KDE 4.0.

    2. Re:slicker by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hey, for what it's worth, I'm the guy who started writing the core code for slicker; except when I started it back on the gentoo forums I called it CardDesk ( no puns, no excess Ks ).

      http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=29746&h ig hlight=slicker

      (Sorry, the screenshots are long gone.)

      I was really excited at first, because what I really wanted to do was to implement MacOS 9 Folder tabs for KDE. Then, everybody and their uncle wanted in on it. I just wanted to write code. So I let them have it, and I continued to develop the core for a while. I suspect 75% of them gave up when they realized XFree just won't do true transparency (yet).

      The thing is, 2 things happened. First, I started it in the first place simply because I wanted folder tabs, and a quick break from my real work. Second... I got a mac, and ported my real work over, and haven't looked back since.

      Oh well!

      I hope the guys who took the helm are treating my little baby well. I'm sure I wouldn't even recognize 90% of the code at this point.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    3. Re:slicker by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Slicker was a clever idea (lifted from Mac OS 9 ;-) and I think it sparked a lot of interest because there is so little good "innovation" with KDE/Gnome. Sometimes I think KDE/Gnome would almost be better off if they simply copied the time-tested Mac OS 9 HIG. Instead of copying Windows' mistakes and reinventing the wheel, copy something that has worked since 1984.. and THEN fix it incrementally.

  16. mirror of KDE on 24 link by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is another site that talks about 24 using KDE, since the link in the article seems to be /.'ed, or just dead to begin with. I didn't notice this on 24... how cool is that?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    1. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by oscarcar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have a suspicion my old "C Programming Teacher" is behind this.

      I had a teacher by the name of "Michael Loceff". That's the same name of the guy who's the producer/writer of the show.

      When I took an online class from him years ago, he said he did screen-writing on his spare time. He even let his class know when a show aired on "Le Femme Nikita" that he wrote. Kudos to him for bringing real tech to the screen.

    2. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by Adrian+De+Leon · · Score: 1

      Well, I read in a Salon interview with one of the producers of 24 that we also did some work on Nikita.

      So it is posible that they hired someone they worked with previously?

      Anyway, I am a Gnome fan, but it is still cool to see KDE on 24.

      By the way, 24 rules!! :-)

      --
      adl

      My boring ramblings
    3. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Just a little bit of misinformation on that site, I'm afraid:

      If a GPL'd set of icons had been used, would we now be legally able to modify, sell and distribute the episode under the terms of the GPL over the internet?

      The answer to that question is NO, the GPL does not affect the licensing of the TV show.

    4. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, not to mention that the icons were LGPL anyways, and that it's covered under fair use.

    5. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, it is perfectly alright to refer to the TV show as 'Nikita', which is what it's called. 'La Femme Nikita' is reserved for the movie.

      Second, I guess MacOS and Windows used in other places in 24 and in the previous seasons is somehow not 'real tech'?

    6. Re:mirror of KDE on 24 link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They made a TV-show too?
      Jeez.. as if the american remake wasn't bad enough..

  17. How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How much longer until we get a completely SVG user interface? Thats the main feature I want, I also would like them to work on making it faster. Why arent they trying to optimize the current code before adding new features? KDE is slow!

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      new features always come before speed improvements

      speed improvements can be relied on in hardware later

      If you actually think that an SVG will be *quicker* than a bitmapped one then you will be sorely disappointed.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what machine you're on. I find GNOME 2.4 to be very slow, and KDE 3.2 (and even 3.1 to a lesser extent) to be very fast. On my machine (2GHz P4) its as fast as WinXP, anyway.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting
      NURBS! SVG's ok, but you really want a fully NURBS-based interface, with a decent photon-mapping rendering engine.


      (Well, assuming you've a spare Altix 3000 or two, for a graphics processor. :)


      Seriously, the graphics processing code for the UI is getting silly. If I want raw speed, but with a decent widget set, I invariably turn to Open Look. I use KDE and Gnome when non-geeks are around, so that they can be suitably impressed and indoctrinated in the Ways Of The Penguin.


      The best GUI engine developed, IMHO, was InterViews, which used a version of Postscript for everything. Postscript gave you the benefit of totally scalable graphics, so you could enlarge or shrink with zero loss. It was standard. It was also the same language other devices used, so translation from device to device was unnecessary. And it supported more than simple vectors.


      The problem, as I see it, is that we've wound up with a bazillion amazingly powerful GUI front-ends, none of which do appreciably more than InterViews, all of which are amazingly heavyweight, and none of which enforce scalability.


      If I get twice the resolution, I want to be able to choose four times the clarity or four times the content, or anywhere inbetween, but not have the choice imposed on me by the system. That's not an advance, that's just stupid.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by stilborne · · Score: 1

      you imply that the KDE project doesn't optimize at all, or at least optimizes hardly anything. if you read the KDE CVS Digests that come out every week you'll notice that optimizations make it in all the time. there have been a number of optimizations throughout KDE in the 3.2 release, from khtml to the kdepim libraries to kmail to....

      as the various libraries and apps mature towards feature completeness, there is indeed a good amount of work put towards making things faster.

      if you are looking at the start up times of apps as the measuring stick, you should look in part to GNU linker tools for answers. this is fortunately getting better with time. and not that KDE is blameless, but it isn't the only (or perhaps even primary) cullprit in the start up time area.

    5. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      How much longer until we get a completely SVG user interface? Thats the main feature I want

      Why? What does SVG give you, as a user, that the alternative doesn't? Positing a decent API, I can think of some benefits to the developer, but I can't think of any to the user.

      First, it will be slower. Period. Your video display is bitmap based, while SVGs are vector based. It will always be faster to use a png than a svg with the current hardware. A vector based display would be different, but I just don't see any truecolor vector displays anywhere on the horizon.

      Second, you won't notice any differences. The Crystal icon theme is touted as being SVG, but if you actually look at the icons, they're all pngs. A 32x32 SVG icon will look identical to the 32x32 png icon generated from it.

      Okay, the scaling issue might make a difference. What if you wanted your icons to be 33x33 instead of 32x32. In that case SVG would be the way to go. But are you REALLY going to want this fine of a control over the sizes of your icons, buttons and doohickeys? But it would still be faster to render pngs from the SVGs on the fly. Unless of course you wanted fully dynamic scaling of everything. That would require a vector format, but that level of eyecandy is going to seriously impact the performance of your machine.

      I also would like them to work on making it faster.

      Well which is it! A dog slow SVG interface or a quick and snappy UI without SVG? You can't get both.

      Why arent they trying to optimize the current code before adding new features?

      You do realize that SVG is a new feature, don't you? Don't you?

      Geez...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    6. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 2 GHz machine with a kickass 3D accelerated graphics card (and 2D vecotrs _should_ just be 3d with Z=0, deficiencies of current gfx toolkits notwithstanding).

      Oh, and a 1600x1200 LCD monitor. Or two, soon.

      So Yes, I WANT SVG (or, hell, eps, why not?) icons.

    7. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      First, it will be slower. Period.

      Wrong, that is an incorrect reduction of a complex issue. Every "absolute" assertion is incorrect sometimes. (Even that one). In reality, we can concoct several scenarios where vector-based graphics can be faster.

      Your video display is bitmap based,

      Wrong. It is understandable that if one lacks this base fact, invalid conclusions will be reached.

      For 10 years or more, we have had what's called "accelerated" video cards. And for 5 years, there have been "3-d accelerated" cards. Both kinds of hardware accept vector-based inputs, in addition to some bitmap support.

      If a UI theme is designed such that the majority of its needed can be handled by 3-d accelerator functions on videocards, then it might be much faster than the equivalent them represented as bitmaps. And more importantly, the speed limiting bottlenecks will come in different places- ie, a vector-theme's speed is mostly independent of screen resolution, so you can go to 2048x1540 or beyond.

      A prime motivation to develope SVG-based UI imagery is to leverge the vector-processing abilities of current videocards, which are currently utilized only by videogames.

    8. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      Totally off-topic, but is that "Vision Thing" in your sig in any way related to the old PsEMU Vison Thing?

    9. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

      Then use Fluxbox!!!

    10. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by parkanoid · · Score: 1

      NeXT used display postscript (DPS) as well, with the benefits you describe, plus the ability to export the display remotely similar to X windows. OSX uses quartz, which utilizes Display PDF, which is somewhat similar.

    11. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      A prime motivation to develope SVG-based UI imagery is to leverge the vector-processing abilities of current videocards, which are currently utilized only by videogames.

      This worked for Apple with Quartz, since Apple is in control of the hardware. (actually, Quartz does a lot of prerendering, IIRC). But KDE is not in control of the user's hardware. This is a huge obstacle to overcome.

      In case you do not realize it, KDE is not limited to Linux on x86 platforms. Don't forget the BSDs and commercial Unices. And don't forget the PPCs, Sparcs and Alphas. Even on the "Lintel" platform, you still have a wide variety of graphics cards, some of which do not have decent Linux drivers. Are there even any 3D accelerated NVidia or ATI drivers for LinuxPPC?

      If I'm not playing video games or rendering 3D animations, I don't need a $500 video card with attached HooverMatic fan. That's because everything else is 2D. I don't need my 2D desktop any faster, because it's so fast now I wouldn't notice the difference.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    12. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an even faster machine than you, with a native driver for my 3D accelerated card, on just as big of a screen. But only because I'm rich. We don't want to leave out the poor working stiff, or the business struggling with its margin, just so the elite user can get his rocks off with eyecandy.

    13. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by roard · · Score: 1

      Yes, and GNUstep is a free, LGPL implementation of the OpenStep specifications (Cocoa is also an OpenStep implementation), running on Linux/BSD. It uses a PostScript rendering model, so it is as vectoriel as you'd want. Note that's not really useful for the moment (300 DPI screens aren't yet cheaply available), but it has at least the BIG advantage of writing the same code for the display and the printer -- basically, a GNUstep drawing backend is a big vectoriel canvas.

    14. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by roard · · Score: 1

      We already have one with GNUstep; More exactly, GNUstep uses a PostScript display model, and all the drawing (widgets, etc.) are vectoriel. This has the advantage of not duplicate code between display and printer (as it is PostScript).

    15. Re:How long until KDE-SVGUI? by faust2097 · · Score: 1
      The best GUI engine developed, IMHO, was InterViews, which used a version of Postscript for everything. Postscript gave you the benefit of totally scalable graphics, so you could enlarge or shrink with zero loss. It was standard. It was also the same language other devices used, so translation from device to device was unnecessary. And it supported more than simple vectors.


      SVG is very similar to Postscript and PDF. The syntax is similar, the structure of the documents is similar, the same company invented all 3 and they all use cubic spline curves instead of Flash's wonky quadratic splines (ever wonder why small type frequently looks weird in Flash?)
  18. KMidi is Dropped by robbyjo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's good to notice that KMidi is dropped from KMultimedia. It's a pain because of the old Timidity engine (which is KMidi's back-end) still uses the old ALSA 0.5. It causes compilation problems if you compile KMultimedia with ALSA yourself. And KDE people decided to get rid of it at the moment and cited that it's not an easy fix.

    It's too bad because AFAIK that's the simplest program for MIDI playing using synthesizers (albeit not that good). Other programs are geared toward compositions... Any suggestions?

    --

    --
    Error 500: Internal sig error
    1. Re:KMidi is Dropped by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      timidity -ig :-P Works fine for me using ALSA 0.9

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    2. Re:KMidi is Dropped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I assume you are looking for a sofware synth that's capable of playing MIDI on generic cards, instead of relying on some boffo sound set on the sound card.

      I haven't seen any nice wrapper for this, but FluidSynth looks interesting. From the site:

      • FluidSynth is a real-time software synthesizer based on the SoundFont 2 specifications. It is a "software synthesizer". FluidSynth can read MIDI events from the MIDI input device and render them to the audio device. It can also play MIDI files.
      Maybe someone could put a nice interface on it. But I suspect if you've got the CPU power to run it without many events dropping out, you probably have the cash for a nice soundcard, too.
    3. Re:KMidi is Dropped by robbyjo · · Score: 1

      No, I mean, when you put --with-alsa flag when you compile KDE-Multimedia, it would throw a compilation error. Not using it with ALSA per se. Of course, you can use OSS-compatibility layer of ALSA and compile KMidi with OSS instead... BUT, that causes the other packages of KDE-Multimedia not ALSA-enabled too. Of course if you munge the configuration file, you can get around this, but what a pain!

      See this bug report for details. It's been an outstanding bug like more than 1 year! Yet virtually nobody appreciate this issue!

      This was a bummer because in some sound cards, ALSA driver is far superior (e.g. in SB Live or Audigy) both in terms of performance and features.

      Now that KMidi is gone for good in KDE 3.2 beta and hopefully someone would incorporate newer ALSA into Timidity backend.

      --

      --
      Error 500: Internal sig error
  19. Apple helping to improve KHTML? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I heard it was that Apple simply created a new branch of KHTML and wasn't interested or willing to port their changes and improvements over to the main KHTML branch. Has Apple changed and is now helping out the KDE group? If so what kind of changes and improvements have they made? Bugzilla queries anyone?

    1. Re:Apple helping to improve KHTML? by Carewolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      You heard wrong. Apple kept the development of Safari secret, so the improvement to KHTML was not integrated right away, but when they announced Safari, they sent a rather large patch to KDE that took too long to integrate to make it for KDE 3.1. Since then it has apparently worked smoothly (I am not a khtml-developer though).

  20. Rudi Beta.... by ViolentGreen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Isn't that a flavor of pie or something

    --
    Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
    1. Re:Rudi Beta.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think is a car from the 40's

    2. Re:Rudi Beta.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a rutabega is a root crop like a turnip

  21. Dell by FrostedWheat · · Score: 0, Troll

    I notice it's running on a Dell machine. In the first season all the bad guys used 'em.

    Hmm... my Boss also has a Dell! Arhh!!

    1. Re:Dell by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Troll?

      Ah crap, my boss reads Slashdot!!

  22. Re:KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I spent an hour searching google for what SMTP server meant

    Okay it's one thing to now know what an SMTP server is. Fine. Plenty of people are in the same boat.

    But to use "Sir Haxalot" as your sig and not know? Go back to talking about Britney or the latest UT aimbot on IRC. That is if it's not past your bedtime.

    Hey maybe there's a new l33t desktop wallpaper on kde-look? I'm sure that'll bring all the answers. Heck I bet someone like you could hack the Gibson.

    Sheesh.

  23. Canopy != SCO != Trolltech != QT != KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what if Canopy and SCO own trolltech and trolltech hosts KDE and Canopy Representatives
    are on the Trolltech board of directors

    If anybody says that KDE is associated with SCO and Canopy, they are Flamers and trollers.

    1. Re:Canopy != SCO != Trolltech != QT != KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Trolltech != QT != KDE

      Hmmm, I would argue Trolltech == QT and also mention that without QT, KDE no worky.

    2. Re:Canopy != SCO != Trolltech != QT != KDE by Ice_Balrog · · Score: 1

      Acutually, Canopy == SCO. They own and support it. They could stop the BS forom SCO if they wanted to. It is true, however, that Canopy != Trolltech.
      Second, Trolltech developes QT. QT is GPLed, so it could be independent of Trolltech if needed, but for now it isn't. And, if you wanna do a closed source app with QT, Trolltech == QT.
      Finally, QT == KDE. No QT, no KDE.

      More accuratly, it would be: Canopy == SCO != (Trolltech == closed source QT || Trolltech != GPL QT). GPL QT == KDE.

      --
      #include "sig.h"
  24. language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So i forget, this one is written in C?

    1. Re:language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      German, I heard.

    2. Re:language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds hi-tech, Object-oriented?

    3. Re:language by BetterThanCaesar · · Score: 1

      That would be KC.

      --
      "Stop failing the Turing test!" -- Dilbert
  25. Kontact: how much like Outlook ...? by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... Kontact (an integrated communications package like Outlook) ...

    Just exactly how much "like Outlook" ...?

    God help us all if it's very much like Outlook!

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Kontact: how much like Outlook ...? by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not much at all. The applications in Kontact are not really integrated, they just live in the same window, sort of like tabs in konqueror and mozilla.

      The main improvement with Kontact have been to make the application behave somewhat consistently. The groupware functionality with exchange and kolab plugins will not be completed until after KDE 3.2.

    2. Re:Kontact: how much like Outlook ...? by merdark · · Score: 1

      I would actually hope is *is* like Outlook. Outlook has a great user interface minus the damn IMAP pausing bug.

      Let's hope it's not like evolution though, a poor clone of outlook (that even managed to clone the imap bugs!) but with EXTRA bugs like the todo list simply not working.

      A working outlook would be nice.

    3. Re:Kontact: how much like Outlook ...? by windex82 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.kontact.org/

      Its looking pretty nice to me, like another poster said, its more of a shell for the different aplications to create their window in.

    4. Re:Kontact: how much like Outlook ...? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

      It is less alike than Evolution and a nice piece of software.

  26. You know what? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 0, Troll

    You'd think with all these Linux users who happen to be programmers that they'd make the most advanced sophisticated programming tools, but Linux programming tools are for the most part crap, the only decent programming tool is Kdevelop. So as a rule everyone who uses Kdevelop to write code should add a feature or fix a bug in Kdevelop.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:You know what? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That's really funny. Vi (Or Emacs :) is still an order of magnitude more productive than Visual Studio. There are some tools that are lacking (UML crap for when you have to interface with the OO monkies) but other than that, its all there, just in a different form.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:You know what? by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

      Bullshit, you cannot do rapid development with VI. The whole point of visual studio is to interface with OO, also we need tools which automate, and which allow us to quickly bugfix code. I dont know which world you come from but there you can debug code easily with visual studio, you can also create interactive GUIs and reuse code much easier when its GUI based and point and click. When someone can point and click to reuse code they will do it, but when it requires real effort they might now. Also user interface development, as linux becomes more GUI based those console based apps wont cut it.

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    3. Re:You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're exactly right. Some linux developers think they're hardcore if they use 70's development tools like vim or emacs.

      I wonder how many java developers that claim they use vim or emacs for java development don't really use 21st century development tools like Eclipse or IDEA.

      Does kdevelop have "good" code completion(intellisense) for c++ yet? Slickedit has for a while, but it will set you back a few hundred bucks.

      It would be nice to have good refactoring tools for c++ but the problem is the complexity of the language and the gcc team unwilling to "open" up parts of the compiler code so that tools could take advantage of it. Something about they don't want proprietary vendors using it or something.

      I like vim, which can be embedded into Visual Studio for the best of both worlds if you're on windows, but at some point in time you have to wake up and join the 21st century.

      I hope kdevelop will fullfill the dream of a modern development environment for unix.

    4. Re:You know what? by yamla · · Score: 1

      KDevelop does have something similar to intellisense. I'm not convinced (really, one way or another) whether it is better or worse than that of Visual Studio as I only rarely use it. But it is useful from time to time.

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    5. Re:You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of TUNES as a standards platform; an interface that should act the same on every computer system that implements the standard. The standard would be created collaboratively through the TUNES project. TUNES will be a standard for a complete computing system where the source code to any running program is easily accessible and modifiable on the fly; in a word, reflective

    6. Re:You know what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like to think of your mother as a standard interface which everyone can plug into.

  27. iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm seriously beginning to question the ability of any open source project to challenge Apple on the user experience front. Come on, look at these JuK screen shots and compare to iTunes screen shots.

    Now, I will fully admit to never actually using JuK, but just from its appearance, I don't want to. I do use iTunes extensively (on a Mac, I only use UNIX-based OSs). So, on iTunes, I have 3 control buttons, a pretty status meter, and a search field. That is it. Now look at JuK. There is a crapload of buttons making the interface completely suck. Why is there a save button? I never save in iTunes, when changes get made, they automatically are propagated through the library. Easy. Why are there cut and paste butttons? Do they need to take up screen space. Leave them buried in a menu. How often are they used in the main interface screen? In iTunes, I rarely go to the menu's. About the only time is when I want to create a new smart playlist. The three buttons and the search field take care of 98% of what I want to do on the interface. This is what makes Apple user friendly and pretty to look at.

    If open source wants to be the peoples' desktop, they have to start considering the interfaces they design. There is a reason why people like to use Macs and proclaim the interface as the superior solution: it is. There are things to be learned here, but time and time again, with each new release of a new program, the user interfaces continue to suck.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:iTunes clone? by Durin_Deathless · · Score: 0

      Simplicity is the sum of what you are saying, and I agree. Just have new users sit down and use GNOME 2.4 and KDE 3.1 for equal amounts of time, and see which they are more comfortable in. The simplicity of GNOME almost always is a winner. I find KDE hard to use because the interface is so cluttered. It is actually distracting.

      <rant>
      Note that simple here does NOT mean crippled, it means keep the UI out of the way. Hidden except when needed. Only stuff I use all the time should be visible. That feature that only 1% of the population will use? Keep it hidden, either as a by default disabled item or in a menu somewhere.
      </rant>

      --
      You should use AdiumX on your Mac.
    2. Re:iTunes clone? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why go to a menu to create a smart playlist?

      Just hold option (alt) and click the 'New Playlist' button. You'll notice the icon change to a gear and all is well and good.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    3. Re:iTunes clone? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
      I agree with you about JuK, I don't see how they claim it is anything like iTunes - I just don't see how it is. That interface does not look anything like iTunes.

      Rhythmbox, OTOH, is an iTunes clone, and it works very much like iTunes does. Unfortuneately, Rhythmbox development has been extremely slow, but it is starting to pick up now, probably because gstreamer is finally starting to become usable.

      --
      Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    4. Re:iTunes clone? by consumer · · Score: 0

      So, you're criticizing an early release of an application that you admit you've never used because it doesn't look enough like some other application that you have used? That will certainly help give developers lots of incentive for innovation...

    5. Re:iTunes clone? by dimator · · Score: 1

      I'd argue that since KDE (and most unix applications, for that matter) are built by geeks, the end product is something that will appeal to geeks/power users.

      Does this mean it has to be ugly, with a million useless buttons, as your example pointed out? Well, not necessarily, but that seems to be more common.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    6. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      JuK is cluttered? Unlike iTunes, JuK actually looks and behaves like all the other apps on its desktop. Besides, the correct button count is 10 for iTunes (you didn't count the ones at the bottom) and 14 for JuK. The extra buttons on the juk toolbar are there in the interest of consistency with other KDE apps. Almost all KDE apps have those buttons in the same place. The screenshot you posted is terrible, take a look at the JuK screenshot here. Looks much nicer doesn it?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    7. Re:iTunes clone? by incom · · Score: 1

      Yes the layout could be more minimal and refined, but most of the appearance can be better "skinned" by using more visually appealing qt and kde theme components. Look at kdelook.org for more info. It may not be Mac OSX pretty, but it can look much better than the default-esque screenshots.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    8. Re:iTunes clone? by Brandybuck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Come on, look at these JuK screen shots and compare to iTunes screen shots.

      How the hell can you determine "user experience" based on screenshots!?! I've never used iTunes, but I can guarantee you that it's outward visual appearance is completely irrelevant to its usability. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it's very usable. But usability is not related to appearance. My Dodge Neon is every bit as usable as my neighbor's Plymouth PT Cruiser. Which should come as no surprise since the everything's the same between those vehicles except for the styling.

      JuK is very usable, despite its lackluster appearance. It's probably the most usable multimedia application I've every used. It's just not pretty.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    9. Re:iTunes clone? by groomed · · Score: 0, Troll

      The screenshot you posted is terrible, take a look at the JuK screenshot here. Looks much nicer doesn it?

      Ah. And why is that? Could it be that it looks nicer because it looks more like MacOS X?

      Talk about missing the point...

    10. Re:iTunes clone? by reeve · · Score: 1

      No flamewars please, but you should look at any of the newer (2.0 and up) releases of GNOME. Everything is simple and right to the point, and if you need more, there's always a way to do it that's intutive to a "power user" and yet not distracting or confusing to a "newbie".

      --
      Reeve the cat
    11. Re:iTunes clone? by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that no program out there right now works as well as iTunes. iTunes is great because it gives people what they want in terms of features, nothing more, nothing less. I love the categorization, search box (it's SO EASY!) and music sharing, ripping, and burning. The clones out there arne't anywhere near the level of features and stability yet. It's so good in fact that i'm switching back to windows from linux mainly to use it. say what you will, but it's really a killer app. i use mozilla firebird and thunderbird in windows anyway so really not much M$ stuff overall.

      oh yeah and I like photoshop better than the gimp. sometimes you just need the best tool for the job. but i still use unix for my servers, where it is the best-suited tool for the job.

    12. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, you have the prettiest KDE desktop I have ever seen! :) I am a gnome fan myself and all the KDE screens I see I dont find appealing. Yours on the other hand was superb...

      Great Screens!

    13. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Settings -> Toolbars -> Show Main Toolbar

      ...and the clutter disappears. Voila!

    14. Re:iTunes clone? by Enucite · · Score: 1

      One reason I usually prefer Gnome... Gnome apps tend to keep things simpler.

      http://www.rhythmbox.org/screenshots.html

    15. Re:iTunes clone? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Only stuff I use all the time should be visible.

      How does the developer know what you use all the time? The obvious answer is to run some usability studies. The the unobvious results are that different people will use different things. What you use all the time is not going to be what I use all the time, or what Joe down the street uses all the time.

      One quick example from GNOME. I just changed my wallpaper. Now the theme's color scheme doesn't match my wallpaper. How to change the color scheme without changing the widget or wm theme? In KDE this is simple. In GNOME this is an advanced option to themes. Huh?

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    16. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ahh well there's the pointless cut/copy/paste buttons. and some new/save buttons that are completely generic .. what exactly am I saving? playlists? do I use the load button to load saved playlists or to load MP3s? why would I not want all my playlists to just appear all the time?

      and the empty space to the right of the column headings (.., Year, Length, .. emptiness ..) is that another column??

      What does "normal matching" mean??? what does "collection list" mean, is that my whole music collection .. list?

      why the separate "pause" and "stop" buttons. when I want the music to stop, which should I press? this isn't a tape recorder, there's no need for a distinction. what happens if I press the play button while it's playing, does it pause? why doesn't the play button turn into a pause button when playing? This isn't a tape recorder, buttons can change depending on context.

      What are those sliders for, is that one big slider or two sliders?

      Why is "collection list" repeated at the bottom? can't I just look at the one that's highlighted? My eye is at the top of the screen first.

      what are those numbers in the lower right? track/total time? elapsed/remaining time? and that arrow? what does it do?

    17. Re:iTunes clone? by roskakori · · Score: 1
      The screenshot you posted is terrible, take a look at the JuK screenshot here. Looks much nicer doesn it?
      yeah, i can see it now! just don't have any music tracks, and the interface is a lot less cluttered. why didn't we think of that before? it so obvious! </sarcasm>
    18. Re:iTunes clone? by b-baggins · · Score: 1

      Easy. It's called screen clutter and widget placement. You can tell a LOT about usability from a screen shot.

      Why do you think that good GUI development consists of doing screen mockups before actual code is written?

      --
      You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    19. Re:iTunes clone? by Wuffle · · Score: 1

      For iTunes on Windows you hold down shift instead to do the same thing.

      Just so you know :)

    20. Re:iTunes clone? by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


      I've never used iTunes, but I can guarantee you...

      JuK is... probably the most usable multimedia application I've every used.

      ...sounds like you should also try iTunes.

      ~jeff

    21. Re:iTunes clone? by no_choice · · Score: 1

      > The extra buttons on the juk toolbar are there in the interest of consistency with other KDE apps.
      > Almost all KDE apps have those buttons in the same place.

      So buttons that never get clicked should be present... to be "consistent?" That's like saying that my radio should have brightness and contrast knobs to be "consistent" with my televison....

    22. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, why do cut copy and paste have to be on the toolbar of a music player? Consistency is one thing, anal-retentiveness another. The one main irritation I have with KDE is that in every single KDE app there are twice as many buttons on the toolbar as there should be. Ofcourse, some would argue that would be anal-retentive in its own way. But hey, if you're building a GUI, it needs to look clean.

      What I want is the look of gnome, with the features, speed and stability of KDE. Why is that so hard?

    23. Re:iTunes clone? by Adrian+De+Leon · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! This is a very detail critic/analisis of Juk's GUI.
      Damn, I wish I hadn't posted earlier on, so I could use my moderation points.

      This is exactly what Open Source Apps need. Gnome has its HIG, does KDE has something similar?

      --
      adl

      My boring ramblings
    24. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Running 24 pt display fonts might make for nice screenshots, but who actually would want to use it? MacOS and Windows generally use 9-12pt fonts.

    25. Re:iTunes clone? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      IIRC, rhythmbox doesn't have smart playlists the way iTunes does.

      The only real reason I'm still using xmms instead of rhthymbox, though, is that their "shuffle" mode is crappy. In XMMS, I randomize the playlist, then turn shuffle off, so that I only hear each song once per iteration through the playlist (which works out to once every 4 days, assuming I listened to the playlist continuously, without stopping for food or sleep :)

      In rhythmbox, there is no "randomize playlist", only "shuffle", which is a 'pure' random play, which gives you screwy results like hearing the same song 3 times in an hour, and never hearing one other song, ever. That drives me nuts.

    26. Re:iTunes clone? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Why do you think that good GUI development consists of doing screen mockups before actual code is written?

      Good GUI development starts with a GUI mockup. This is not the same thing as a screen mockup. It's far different. And this mockup is just the *start*, not the middle or the end. Good usability designers do NOT use photoshop.

      In the same way that a photo of a sports car tells me nothing about the way it handles, a mere screenshot tells me little about the usability of an application. It might reveal some gross mistakes that were made, but not much else.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    27. Re:iTunes clone? by Bishop923 · · Score: 1

      JuK actually looks and behaves like all the other apps on its desktop.

      I have never understood this argument. Why would a user expect their MP3 player to look and behave like a word processor or web browser? To put it in more abstract terms, where is the expectation that a program designed for audio playback look and work like an app designed for text manipulation and display?

      The extra buttons on the juk toolbar are there in the interest of consistency with other KDE apps.

      Why would I want or need a save button in an app that deals with read-only data 99% of the time? I can see maintaining consistency between similar apps. If I open a web browser I should be able to refer to my previous experience using other web browsers and be able to navigate. However, if I launch Photoshop, there is a certain understanding that "Hey I'm using an app that is different than my audio player or web browser, things may not be the same"

      Desktop integration should only dictate the look an feel of an app when nessecarry, but there should be enough leeway given to applications with fundamentally different paradigms to avoid unessecarry features and UI cruft.

    28. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      The usuability studies will eventually reveal statistics as to what gets used most often by the majority of the people. For instance, 99.9% of the people would use the play button on iTunes. A significant number probably also use the search field. Well above 95%. There are some people who are probably confused by this searching and avoid using. However, a lot of people use it very often, so it needs to be there.

      Now, you may use the cut and paste buttons a lot, but mabey only 10% of the people are like you. So, take them off the main screen. You can get used to finding that sort of stuff in the menus or use the shortcut keys.

      Obviously nothing will satisfy everyone all the time. This is the lamest argument to bring up in situations like this. The key is finding the correct balance. Apple does this very well. Both KDE and GNOME struggle.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    29. Re:iTunes clone? by Wolfkin · · Score: 1
      [...]in iTunes, when changes get made, they automatically are propagated through the library. Easy.

      Yeah, that sucks, doesn't it? I hate what iTunes did to my music folders when I first switched this last summer. When I finally noticed that songs weren't where I expected them to be, I went hunting, and finally found them in another folder, stupidly renamed according to what iTunes thought they should be instead of clearly named according to my naming system, as I'd manually done. I hate, hate, hate iTunes.

      When Mac programs do stuff behind the scenes that I would have done myself, I talk about how it "just works" like everyone else, but once in a while, it does something behind the scenes that's just wrong, and once in a while does something boneheaded like this.

      Song after song named "Soundtrack Track 11", "Sndtrck - Trck 04", "Bone feat. Thugs, Harmony Song 5". Disaster. I hate that.

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
    30. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you are just trolling here, so I will explain how things are done so that others don't get the wrong impression.

      First off, you can tell iTunes to not organize your music by turning the option off. In this case, no renaming or moving of your songs will take place. Simple.

      I however, prefer iTunes to do the dirty work and organize it for me, because it does a good job. Here is how it works (in iTunes 4 at least, I've never used prior versions).

      A directory is made for each artist. Album directories are made inside their respective artist directories. Songs then go into the album directories saved by song name plus an extension. If two songs somehow have the same name (such as untitled tracks) iTunes will append a number after the name so no files get over written.

      Here is an example:

      Counting Crows/August And Everything After/Mr. Jones.mp3
      Counting Corws/This Desert Life/Hanginaround.mp3

      Very simple. Very Easy.

      For soundtracks and compilations, there is a check box to tell iTunes it is a compilation. These files are thrown into a Compilations folder and Album subfolders, with songs in the album subfolders. For example:

      Compilations/Matrix/Some song on this soundtrack.mp3
      Compilations/Lost In Translation/Some Song Name.mp3

      I don't see why anyone would have a problem with this naming convention, as it is incredibly easy, but if you do, tell it not to organize. The files will stay put.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    31. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why we have Gnome.

      I agree on KDE though.

    32. Re:iTunes clone? by worm+eater · · Score: 1

      Almost all KDE apps have those buttons in the same place.

      That's exactly the problem. Shouldn't form follow function? Here, form is following Form. These buttons are unnecessary in a jukebox app. Get rid of em.

      --
      Maybe partying will help...
    33. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      You are right about the ones on the bottom. I neglected to mention these. This is also one of the nice interface perks about iTunes. Those buttons blend in well, and are small and unobtrusive. Generally, they go unnoticed until you want to use them. I use the Visualizer button a fair amount to put iTunes into full screen viz mode. When I'm not using them, they stay out of the way however. Unlike the buttons on JuK which are constantly glaring back at you.

      The other screen shot does look cleaner, but this is a theming issue. The usability points still stand. You raised the issue of consistency among apps, which is valid to a point. Cut and paste buttons are handy in a text editor/word processor. They go unused for the most part in a MP3 player. So why should they be there? People play music in a music player, they are not editing much text, with the exception of tagging songs, in which case resigning the cut and paste options to a menu makes sense.

      Application consistency makes sense for apps that have a consistent purpose. Once that purpose deviates significantly, it hinders the application to be consistent with the others.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    34. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Don't critique a GUI you haven't used. Things make a lot more sense when you actually use the UI. For example, when a song is playing, its obvious that the slider that is moving is the time control, and the one that isn't is the volume. Also, in the bottom right, the number that is changing is the current song time, and the number that isn't is the total length. JuK needs some work (cut/copy/paste are probably extraneous, some elements need better labels) but remember, its a beta version of a new app.

      Also, as for the "changing depending on context" thing: a lot of classic MacOS users find that one of the most annoying things about OS X is its tendency to move things around when you're not paying attention. Thus, you've got the constantly shifting dock, changing button uses, etc.

      But I can play that game too. Let's critique iTunes's GUI

      1) What the hell is that diamond shaped thing in the LCD view? If I didn't have an iPod, I wouldn't guess that its the time control. It doesn't even look like something you can manipulate!

      2) What the hell are those buttons along the bottom? The icon images tell very little about their purpose. Also, they certainly are not consistent with the images used in the rest of Aqua.

      3) Why is "Burn CD" all the way in the right-hand corner? Toolbar items are supposed to start on the left and work their way right.

      4) What is the little arrow with the triangle in the LCD view?

      5) Why are the play controls so far away from the selection pane?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    35. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I have never understood this argument. Why would a user expect their MP3 player to look and behave like a word processor or web browser?
      >>>>>>>>>
      Because of consistency. Its less asthetically egregious when the various apps on your desktop "match," and its also easier to use when everything works the same way. And I'm not going to mention the fact that OS X's web browser (Safari) looks nothing like its word processor...

      To put it in more abstract terms, where is the expectation that a program designed for audio playback look and work like an app designed for text manipulation and display?
      >>>>>>>>>>>
      Stuff that can be the same, should be the same. For example, many users understand cut/paste. However, they often don't realize that there are ways to do that besides the icons on the toolbar. So when they want to copy something, they go to the toolbar to do it. If the familiar copy icon is not there, they get stuck.

      Why would I want or need a save button in an app that deals with read-only data 99% of the time?
      >>>>>>>>>
      Actually, there is lots of data to save in a jukebox. JuK handles playlists and ID3 tags, so it makes sense to have a save function that saves those.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    36. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The buttons seem pretty obvious to me. And you're in no position to complain that the icons in JuK are "glaring at you" if you don't use it on a regular basis. If anything, they're unobtrusive, simply because they're in the same place in all apps.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    37. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The widget style looks nothing like OS X. Neither do the Crystal icons. The menubar and panel *look* superficially like OS X, but they don't behave the same.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    38. Re:iTunes clone? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      > The usuability studies will eventually reveal statistics as to what gets used most often by the majority of the people

      The problem with this is that usability studies need money to be done. KDE, simply put, doesn't have any money. Companies (as in every commercial Linux distro except for RH) that use KDE as their main environment probably should shell out money to do usability studies. Very few people have unfortunatly.

      Note that the KDE developers have often responded quickly to usability studies. For example, Relevantive AG did a study comparing WindowsXP and KDE on Linux. They said in their study that users were confused by the difference between "folders" and "directories" in KDE. Recently, pretty much all mentions of "directory" was changed to "folder" within all of KDE. This is part of KDE 3.2.

    39. Re:iTunes clone? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      My laptop has a 133 dpi resolution TFT. Yes, that's 1600x1200 on a 15" screen. Those fonts are all 9pt. Arial is the sans-serif, and Vera is the serif.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    40. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with GNOME is that it's so damn *incomplete*. It doesn't even feel like a whole desktop anymore, unlike OSX, WindowsXP, or even KDE.

      The best desktop on UNIX-type environments was once CDE. It's been replaced by KDE. KDE just needs a lot of cleaning up.

    41. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks like 12 font (normal) on my screen.. he probably has a high res screen.

      BTW, longhorn will also be optimized for high res screens, so if that looks like a 24 pt font, you're in serious trouble buddddyy!

    42. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! This is a very detail critic/analisis of Itune' GUI.
      Damn, I wish I hadn't posted earlier on, so I could use my moderation points.

      This is exactly what Commercial Apps need. Apple has its HIG, does Microsoft has something similar?

      adl

    43. Re:iTunes clone? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a shame xtunes is gone. JuK doesn't look like much of an iTunes clone- where is the browse feature ala iTunes? I don't mean the iTMS, but the reason I use iTunes on my Mac- being able to use a paned-browser to navigate to the CD I want to listen to, rather than having to maintain play lists- which is why I don't use XMMS or an older Winamp.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    44. Re:iTunes clone? by fault0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but rhythmbox is a itunes clone pretty much. juk isn't.

      Of cours,e that begs the question, why doesn't anyobody make a itunes clone for KDE? Oh wait..

    45. Re:iTunes clone? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Apple does this very well. Both KDE and GNOME struggle.

      Probably because Apple has paid usability professionals with some experience behind them, rather than a bunch of people spouting their mouths off.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    46. Re:iTunes clone? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      In otherwords- most KDE apps look like shit, so JuK should too!

      I suppose I follow that- consistency over all I say. No, iTunes uses brushed metal, but manages to be pretty consistent with the other "iApps."

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    47. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is one of the points in my comment, though stated not so directly.

      Apple has spent considerable amounts of money on usability studies invovling iTunes and their other apps. So it is safe to assume that iTunes is what people want in a music organizer interface. Since KDE doesn't have money to through around, and no one is willing to donate to the cause, they should learn by example. The first thing they should have done when designing their interface is take a look at other well respected media organizers (iTunes arguably being the most respected) and learn from the interface. They don't appear to have done so, however.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    48. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      When I see the screen shots, the useless buttons jump right out at me. I don't notice the bottom buttons in iTunes, probably due to placement. Eyes gravitate to the top rather than bottom.

      I only recently got a mac and switched to itunes. However, i envied it based on every screen shot i saw. The interface was clean and simple, exactly what I wanted from a media player, which is one of the reasons I baught a mac, it looked clean and easy. When I see a screen shot with useless clutter, I think, I am not going to use it because it is wasting screen real estate for unused functions. A lot can be said for first impressions. Now, as soon as JuK cleans up the interface and releases impressive screen shots, I will install it and give it a try. If its better than iTunes, I will switch. However, if my initial reaction is "what crap" I am not going to waste my time, even though I haven't actually used it. FYI, I'm not drawn to mac because i'm stupid, I consciously make the descision to have an easy to use desktop os. I've done custom Linux projects compiling from source the whole way up just to have the bare minimum installed.

      In any case, the buttons are not unobtrusive due to the fact that all apps use them. Reverse the situation and this becomes more apparent.

      Saying "all apps use those buttons" derive "all apps" from editors/word processors because thats what most people originally became accustomed to first. What if media playing were the original app. Would you expect to find a play and pause button in your word processor just because all the other apps had them. That would be rediculous. Likewise, it is rediculous to have copy, paste, save, etc buttons on your media organizer.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    49. Re:iTunes clone? by mcubed · · Score: 1

      ahh well there's the pointless cut/copy/paste buttons

      Pointless? You never cut/copy/paste data into or from an OGG tag. Oh, I forgot, you must use a proprietary, copy-protected format -- does AAC or whatever it's called have tags? Can you edit them, or is that a copyright violation?

      and some new/save buttons that are completely generic .. what exactly am I saving? playlists? do I use the load button to load saved playlists or to load MP3s? why would I not want all my playlists to just appear all the time?

      You would want all your playlists loaded all the time, all at once? You don't want to be able to pick and choose amongst your playlists? Or is that prohibited by the TOS?

      What does "normal matching" mean??? what does "collection list" mean, is that my whole music collection .. list?

      It appears to me that JuK is ideally suited for people who keep their music in folders, say album folders for example (which looks like the example pictured in the screenshots). Suits me, since that's how I like to organize my collection. But you could also organize it by genre, era, etc. Juk will apparently pick up on how you like to organize your music, rather than dictate to you the way it wants you organize your music. Why is this a bad thing? Are you so determined to be told how to do things by Apple that the thought of making your own decisions scares you?

      And I would guess that "normal matching" is as opposed to "regex" matching. Can you search using regular expressions in iTunes?

      why the separate "pause" and "stop" buttons. when I want the music to stop, which should I press?

      You are really desperate here, aren't you?

      Michael

      --
      "No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality;..."
    50. Re:iTunes clone? by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

      I wasn't trolling; I'm just still irritated by the behavior (although I stopped using iTunes immediately upon finding this out, in June).

      Telling iTunes not to organize my music was no longer an option after it had already messed everything up. I wasn't willing to give it another chance after I spent many hours listening to the first 15-30 seconds of about a thousand songs to figure out what they were.

      The naming convention seems incredibly easy, but only works if iTunes knows what the song is, and in my case, not only did it screw up the naming of things that I'd prefer to name slightly differently, it gave me a

      Unknown Artist/Unknown Album/

      structure under which it filed virtually all my music, so all I had to go on was a name that I might or might not recognize, and which often seemed to include the artist's name in some fashion. I've had a few problems with OS X apps since switching, but this one completely takes the cake for screwups I've had with Mac software.

      I understand that if I'd known it was going to do that, I could have told it not to do it. In the meantime, I found whamb, which is an mp3 player that just plays mp3s, and doesn't reorganize my music, too. In fact, whamb works much like XMMS did on my Gentoo system.

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
    51. Re:iTunes clone? by labratuk · · Score: 1

      For someone who wants to "End cliche Slashdot comments!" you do a pretty good job of posting cliche comments.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    52. Re:iTunes clone? by afree87 · · Score: 1
      If open source wants to be the peoples' desktop, they have to start considering the interfaces they design.

      Sounds like what you want is GNOME.

    53. Re:iTunes clone? by Enucite · · Score: 1

      That just goes to show, KDE tends to go for the projects with more features and stays away from simplicity. Not to say that's a bad thing at all. Just not my preference.

      It's great that we can have two successful projects with such different styles.

    54. Re:iTunes clone? by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess I can't say I'm familiar with your situation. iTunes pulls out the song, album, and artist info from the ID3 tags embedded in the MP3. The only way for the Unknown Artist/Unkown Album to show up is if the song doesn't have any ID3 info.

      This seems logical since most people tag their MP3s. I'll assume you had your reasons for not doing so, and I'll leave it at that.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    55. Re:iTunes clone? by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      I'm seriously beginning to question the ability of any open source project to challenge Apple on the user experience front. Come on, look at these JuK screen shots and compare to iTunes screen shots.

      and your point was???... of course you didn't have one, it was just that reflex to worhip the great god jobs and his devine system OS Puke, I looked at the screen shots of the two and Kde's Juk might have been just a little nicer, but there was stuff all in it.

      I know I'll be modded troll or flame bait for questioning the gospel of mac, but really it's got so if we have a story on earth worms or camels you mac trolls will find a way to whore for OS X with it.

      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    56. Re:iTunes clone? by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I forgot, you must use a proprietary, copy-protected format -- does AAC or whatever it's called have tags?

      Yes, AAC has tags, and no, it is not a proprietary format. It's open MPEG4. And it's not by default copy-protected - only the AAC files downloaded from Apple's store are. Standard AAC is an open, unencumbered format.

      You would want all your playlists loaded all the time, all at once? You don't want to be able to pick and choose amongst your playlists?

      Sure, you want to be able to pick and choose between your playlists, but it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to have to open them with a standard file dialog (well, it does on some level, but not from a usability standpoint). I much prefer the iTunes approach of having them all loaded in the sidebar and you can get to any of them in a single click.

      Or is that prohibited by the TOS?

      Dear lord.

      Can you search using regular expressions in iTunes?

      No. However, while I am a longtime Unix geek who has long appreciated the power of regular expressions, I can not say that I have ever once wanted to search by regex in an mp3 program.

      See, Apple actually thinks through their interfaces rather than blindly stuffing power-user features everywhere. Where they belong, they aren't afraid to use them - Apple's new IDE, Xcode, has the ability to create "smart groups," which are analogous to iTunes "smart playlists," and these allow you to use regular expressions as well as simple text searches. See, that's because it makes sense in an IDE - it simply does not in a music program.

      You are really desperate here, aren't you?

      He has a good point, so answer the question. Why separate pause and stop buttons? Seems to me the original posted was right - pause serves the purpose of both.

    57. Re:iTunes clone? by Wolfkin · · Score: 1

      I never needed the ID3 tags, since I wanted the info I cared about in the filename anyway; why type it twice? Of course, the reason, it now appears, is that iTunes thinks the ID3 tag is canonical, and the filename isn't. :(

      --
      Property law should use #'EQ, not #'EQUAL.
    58. Re:iTunes clone? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      and the empty space to the right of the column headings (.., Year, Length, .. emptiness ..) is that another column??

      That point is absolutely useless, there are no songs in the list, of course it's as small as possible, you can get the same effect with iTunes

      What does "normal matching" mean???

      It's one of the different methods for searching, that should be apparent as it's next to the search field - even the names are self-explanatory

      what does "collection list" mean, is that my whole music collection .. list?

      Wow, who would have thought? collection list is a list of my collection, really, wow. What does "Library" mean? Is that a public library in iTunes, can I get books there? You're not the only one who can play absolutely retarded.

      why the separate "pause" and "stop" buttons.

      Because they're two different things, the distinction isn't that big but people know it as it's the same with real world applications; even worse, with iTunes you have *either* pause or stop depending on context and that context doesn't make any sense. And it doesn't complicate things like the abysmal volume control of the old quicktime

      when I want the music to stop, which should I press?

      You never used a cd-player? Don't try to be more stupid than you are

      what happens if I press the play button while it's playing, does it pause?

      Nothing, it's greyed out

      why doesn't the play button turn into a pause button when playing?

      Because some people hate that "feature" of OS X (apparently the Apple people have problems implementing it too, as iTunes for Windows don't has a maximize/restore button =)

      This isn't a tape recorder, buttons can change depending on context.

      Having distinct buttons for distinct functions sounds like something which could have been in Apple's HIG before they changed it for more coolness

      What are those sliders for, is that one big slider or two sliders?

      time and volume control - which is which is apparent as soon as you use it, although they could use some small icons to illustrate their use.

      Why is "collection list" repeated at the bottom?

      Because it's a status bar - the use of which is apparent to everyone who ever used a browser of any kind. Some people out there have actually enough playlists that you have to scroll to see them all

      My eye is at the top of the screen first

      If that's the case, how does that status bar manage to impair your music listening expirience? I'd think that having essential buttons on the bottom like iTunes would be more disadvantageous for a top oriented gentleman like you

      what are those numbers in the lower right? track/total time? elapsed/remaining time?

      That is evident as soon as you see the application in RL instead of critizising screens

      and that arrow? what does it do?

      It jumps to the song currently played - *very* useful and I don't know how to do that with iTunes

      Now, the same for iTune:

      - I'm playing a song and want to pause it because the phone rings, but I only see a stop button, why? Oh yeah, I was currently searching for some song in a different playlist and if I'm doing something absurd like that I can't be allowed to puase iTunes, sacrilegious.
      - The interface wastes more space than the new concept for Longhorn (k, Microsoft always stole from others but never matched the original, they can't even clone an awful UI)
      - What's that little arrow in the lcd thingy?
      - What's that little arrow in the search field
      - what does "Library" mean? is that where I can get the audio books Steve Jobs talked about?
      - Why are all the buttons at the bottom? "My eye is at the top of the screen first"(TM)
      - What's that plus sign? Does it add songs? Playlists? Does it open existing playlists or creating new ones?
      - The next button is absolutely and

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    59. Re:iTunes clone? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      You're calling a screw up of one of the most basic interface paradigms (toolbars at the top) "one of the nice interface perks about iTunes", interesting

      The usability points still stand.

      Your only real point was "iTunes has less buttons" actually it has almost as many as juk and they're not even placed at the top, so what remains? Cut and paste *are* useful, you can use them instead of drag and drop to get new songs from the collection list to a playlist and *many* (typically middle-aged semi-computer-literate) people feel more comfortable with c&p than with dnd

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    60. Re:iTunes clone? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      In rhythmbox, there is no "randomize playlist", only "shuffle", which is a 'pure' random play, which gives you screwy results like hearing the same song 3 times in an hour, and never hearing one other song, ever. That drives me nuts.

      lol.. how do you know that a song is being repeated? I imagine you have a large list. Unless you pay attention and can remember exactly, how do you know how many times a song played? :>

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    61. Re:iTunes clone? by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      how do you know how many times a song played? :>

      Because Rhythmbox displays the play count. I can even sort the list by the number of times a song has been played.

      I can easily look at the playlist and see that in a few short hours, one song has been played tens of times, and other songs have never been played, ever.

      Also, it really gets to me when I hear the same song 3 times in recent memory. It's like, "Gah! I JUST heard this!"

    62. Re:iTunes clone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent comment is an exceptionally impressive post.

  28. Absolutly true by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "There must be amazing advancements made in every field on a daily basis."

    If by "amazing advancements" you mean "more buzzwords" and by "every field" you mean "marketing".

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Absolutly true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "I think we got the joke in the first place" I mean "no fucking shit, dumbass!"

  29. Mirror of the announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  30. mirror by cultobill · · Score: 1, Informative

    Site response is already slow here...

    Mirror from 13:15 GMT -7

    --
    -- Bill "Houdini" Weiss
  31. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I bet theres already 100 music players that are half finished and not a single one of them as good as Winamp.

    Hey, at the risk of replying to flamebait and subjecting myself to a mod down, why don't ya send us all an e-mail when they release a Linux (or a Mac for that matter) version of Winamp?

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  32. Huh? by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    KDevelop is a new application since when exactly?

  33. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There is one: XMMS, even can use the same skin files. :P

  34. Icons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot needs a Canopy icon to group these posts under along with the SCO posts, for Canopy fans.

  35. KBinaryClock by IceFox · · Score: 1
    Although a silly little applet quite a lot of people have been getting a kick out of KBinaryClock which was added to KDE 3.2 in the addons package.

    Screenshots and photos here: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~benjamin/programs/program. php?program=KBinaryClock

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    1. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, Gnome's binary clock has been there forever, and it looks good too.

      KDE's binary clock, OTOH, looks like shit.

    2. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What! another clock for wimps. I use a real clock, one that displays the number
      of seconds since Jan 1st 1970.

    3. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *I* use the number of seconds since Nov 17, 1858. (I can't help it, I was
      raised on VMS and UN*X time doesn't come naturally to me.)

    4. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? MY clock counts from January 1, 4713 B.C. (start of the
      astronomical Julian calendar)

      Merry 2448982!

    5. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I started to make a clock from one of those "build a working paper clock" books, but I got carried away. It's now a complete working paper Analytical Engine, and I run an 80386 simulator on that. I'm booting Linux now, and in a couple of years when it comes up I'll have Xclock running.
      I don't think it's going to keep very good time, though... I keep getting silo overflows reading WWV at 110 baud. I guess I'll need to build a paper 16550 to fix that.

      Which Xclock should I use?

    6. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you are not having real fun telling time until you display as an animated 3d random-dot stereogram an old fashion analog co-co-clock with a bird that flies out at you at the top of the hour with animated figures marching around!

      And when I'm at home, I have a huge pendulum hanging over a large circle in the floor, with the time marks around the edge, and the whole thing tracks the rotation of the earth. A lot of you may think this is nothing, but you should see the small portable one that I carry around with me! Keeps perfect time.

    7. Re:KBinaryClock by Scarpia10 · · Score: 1

      And people say Linux users are nerds???

    8. Re:KBinaryClock by havoc- · · Score: 1

      So, we've come full circle. GNOME removes all extra clock applets from version 2.0 after the Sun usability study (and rightly so!). A few years later, KDE adds extra clock applets. Sheesh.

      Alright, I'll calm down, it's just in the addons package. But it's still a usability problem.

    9. Re:KBinaryClock by be-fan · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. Its in the add-ons package. If the user installs that, it means they made a concious decision to install some extra/neat/silly utilities. If the user is easily confused, they're probably not going to be installing that package anyway!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    10. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is of course, is that most distros install the addons package for kde by default. So, some users think that these things in KDE are part of the KDE desktop, while they really aren't.

    11. Re:KBinaryClock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      co-co-clock with a bird

      Not here. That would be ko-ko-klock.

  36. Make things short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows fan: "It still doesn't look and behave exactly like WindowsXP and is therefore not ready for the Desktop!"

    Linux fan: (Score: -1, Flaimbait, Troll, Anger in the ass)

    1. Re:Make things short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac Fan: It still doesn't look and behave exactly like Mac OS X and is therefore not ready for the Desktop -- and it never will be, because if it's not actually made by Apple, we won't accept it. Apple is just better, no matter what!

    2. Re:Make things short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Apple is just better, no matter what!


      Nice to see you Linux losers are finally coming to grips with this fact. Think different, think professional, think Linux.

    3. Re:Make things short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... your post doesnt make any sense? Are you FOR or AGAINST Linux?

    4. Re:Make things short... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I am.

  37. Um..Xmms.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For a music player with a good GUI and lots of functionality XMMS is the Linux king. Unfortuantaly it doesn't do everything and I can't buy music through it, but its fast, supports more sound and image plugins then you can shake a stick at and has a sharp, skinnable GUI and works better then anything I've been able to use on my Windows pc here at work.

    Xmms is a shining example of OSS quality software and like I'd imagine iTunes is, its a real pleasure to use.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Um..Xmms.. by advocate_one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Unfortuantaly it doesn't do everything and I can't buy music through it," why on earth would you want to buy your musice through it??? it does what it's supposed to do... nothing more, nothing less... if you want to purchase music online then just fire Konq up... and make sure xmms is set as your default player... that's ALL you need to do... why complicate a program with bloat when most people will not be using that feature??? KISS

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    2. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      Here here. I don't know who came up with that interface layout and skin idea originally (WinAmp?) but it was a stroke of genius. It's small, looks good and has everything you need and nothing more. Plus, I don't want a kitchen sink in my music player. I want it to be able to play sound files and have an easy to use and straightforward playlist. That's IT.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    3. Re:Um..Xmms.. by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      I never understood why everyone loves iTunes so much either. I still use winamp2, winamp3 seemed too bloated for me. Heck I just want a player that will play my mp3s for me. I don't need it to calculate the BPM for me, or how often i've listened to a song. I love winamp, especially because of the key mappings. It means i can easily program my bluetooth phone to be a remote control for my music. Great!

    4. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Per+Cederberg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For a music player with a good GUI and lots of functionality XMMS...

      Good GUI? What do you mean? You can't be serious...

      1. Very small controls, some which are hardly possible to see or click. Take the small "O A I D V":s for instance. And don't say that the "DoubleSize" option is anything but a hack...

      2. How about keyboard navigation?

      3. Where are the darned settings? There is no menu bar and it is hard to guess which of the "O A I D V" does what. (Yeah, the window title is clickable, but how are you supposed to know that?)

      4. No tool-tips when hoovering with the mouse.

      5. Everything is clickable, although nothing appears to be. A mistake of a millimeter cause whatever undesired effect. (And how do you figure out how to undo that?)

      6. Window decorations are not consistent with the rest of the world. Same thing with all other widgets.

      Etc, etc. I could go on and on about such things. Yes, you can learn it and live with it, but should you have to? Some people might just want to listen their mp3:s or ogg:s and be done with it. I just don't understand why apps such as XMMS, WinAmp, xine, mplayer, etc can't provide a sensible default UI (skin or whatever) that looks and works like other applications.

      And please, tell me again what skins are good for...

    5. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Alethes · · Score: 2

      XMMS is a shining example of what happens when an open source project copies a Windows app created by amateurs that know nothing about usability.

    6. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      works better then anything I've been able to use on my Windows pc here at work.

      Ever tried... Winamp 2?

      Nullsoft liked XMMS so much they decided to make a cheap clone of it for Windows, so there you go.

      (Yeah, it's a joke, I know XMMS is the clone).

    7. Re:Um..Xmms.. by gss · · Score: 1
      or how often i've listened to a song.

      That feature is very nice to have when building smart playlists. Don't discount a feature until you know what it's for. As for BPM I have no idea what it's for :)

    8. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a music player with a better GUI, try this.

      I'd use it.

    9. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop assuming people don't care about features because they "don't know what it's for."

    10. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Deusy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd suggest that for a music playe with a good GUI you should look at Rhythmbox.

      The current XMMS release is Gtk1 only (boo!) although it is being rewritten from the ground upwards. However, somebody has make a Gtk2 fork of the current XMMS codebase, named Beep which is looking pretty decent.

      I would agree with the original post. JuK looks hideous. However, hideous is not unusable which I would say is the most important point. Still, we'd all be Gucci models if we could.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    11. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      BPM is beats per minute... It is commonly used in dance music and its related counterparts. You can usually tell the type of music from the BPM. Trance would have lower BPM while techno will be higher, and rave will be even higher. Having said that, I don't think any user uses it to distinguish the music. You can tell what the music is by the artist/song so...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    12. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      XMMS is a shining example of what happens when an open source project copies a Windows app created by amateurs that know nothing about usability.

      So, in other words, what you're saying is that XMMS is an extremely high-quality piece of crap? :)

    13. Re:Um..Xmms.. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      2. How about keyboard navigation?

      The keys z, x, c, v, and b are mapped to the main buttons on the main window, ie, z goes to the previous song, x is play, c is pause, v is stop, and b goes to the next song.

      4. No tool-tips when hoovering with the mouse.

      You must have one of those combination mouse/vacuum cleaners. Unfortunately, support for them in linux is poor :)

      6. Window decorations are not consistent with the rest of the world. Same thing with all other widgets.

      Yeah, ok, I don't like that either. That's why I like Rhythmbox... it's a standard GTK2 app and it will look exactly consistent with all your other GTK2 apps. Though, if you're using RH9, there's an XMMS skin called Bluecurve (which is the default on a fresh RH9 install), which tries it's best to make XMMS look like all the other GTK2 apps.

  38. Juk by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I, for one, appreciate more alternative music players on the *nix side of the world. While setting up my music server (with video output to the TV), I tested a variety of applications to see what might work best. My requirements included:

    - The ability to be controlled from an LIRC remote control

    - The ability to interface to an LCD screen for song info (haven't set this up yet, but it was a consideration)

    - Large, easy to read playlist

    - Large buttons that are easy to manipulate by the somewhat awkward mouse on my wireless keyboard

    I tried xine (along with derivatives like the gtk version), and found the playlists difficult to manipulate easily. xmms works decently, but I had to double size the top screen and those unfamiliar with it's interface (or winamp) would have a more difficult time adding songs because the "add" and "remove" buttons are practically unreadable on the TV. Though I found a decent theme, xmms is not designed for full screen usage with large buttons. Because of this, screen real estate is not devoted to things like easy-to-find switching of playlists along with other features I'm sure could be incorporated.

    I would love for Juk to become a full featured sound program which could perform a variety of functions seamlessly:

    - Ability to manipulate playlists on any other computer given appropriate access (without using remote X or VNC). Sharing of music between clients is not important to me, I have my music mounted from a central location within the network

    - creating playlists by the meta data (like "smart" playlists on iTunes).

    - Pop in a CD, have it show up as a separate playlist, and preferably be able to rip the tracks into OGG or FLAC on command

    - Burn mix CDs based off the playlist (not as important, but shouldn't be too hard if code is shared with koncd)

    - Interface doesn't need to be skinnable but should be usable at a variety of resolutions. Keyboard shortcuts should be available for just about everything.

    Looks like some of those features already exist in Juk, and I look forward to using it once it's released with 3.2 stable.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  39. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think not. Using the concept of desktop environment, the comparison is valid.

  40. Qt and Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Qt has always been another of Microsoft's backdoor strategies to destroy linux "when and if".

    Someone would have to be a severe idiot to buy a qt license for their company at $1550 when they can buy the latest copy of windows and visual studio for quite a bit less. Lots of companies refuse to GPL the source to their internal-use applications.

    Of course, there is no shortage of idiots in the world.

    1. Re:Qt and Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why they don't GPL their internal apps.

      If they GPL'ed them nobody (without having binaries received legally) could force them to publish the code.

  41. In the 24 universe,... by burgburgburg · · Score: 1
    the good guys (like Jack Bauer) use Macs. Note the Powerbook he has at this desk and the G4 behind him. The fact that they're running KDE on them is not the important issue. The hardware is Apple.

    From the first season on, bad guys/gals on 24 have used Windows as their OS (this was how we were tipped off that Nina was evil. She suddenly switched computers). The specific hardware (Intel, AMD, etc.) is never noted (for obvious reasons)

  42. Direct Link to FULL Announcement by twener · · Score: 2, Informative
  43. Yes by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can I build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE like I can for GNOME? Or do I still have to pay the 4 digit price tag for a commerical QT DEV license?

    Last I checked, yes you can. The requirement from Qt is non-commercial, not open source (QPL licence, GPL/QPL dual licenced...). If the question was "Can I take Qt, use their work for free in my application to make me money?", then the answer is "No, you need to pay us a licence fee for the way our work has helped you earn money on your work."

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Yes by Kurt+Granroth · · Score: 2, Informative
      Last I checked, yes you can [build fast, non-scripted, closed source apps for KDE..without paying for Qt]. The requirement from Qt is non-commercial, not open source

      This is wishful thinking at best and outright deceptive at worst. The only versions of Qt that you can legally develop with without paying for are licensed with either the GPL or QPL. Both the GPL and QPL require that your application be Open Source. If your application is closed source, then it cannot use a GPLed or QPLed Qt and thus, you must pay for the developer license.

      I wrote the following back in the KDE 2.0 days and it still holds true today:

      KDE Licensing Issues

    2. Re:Yes by p2sam · · Score: 1

      wait a minute, does that mean I am allowed to use QT on all internal applications of a company, free of charge, as long as I don't distribute it to outside of the company?

      sweet...

    3. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an issue that's "in between". Some localities see a whole company as one entity, while others do not.

    4. Re:Yes by p2sam · · Score: 1

      ahh... right, the court would probably go with the "spirit" of the license, instead of an obviously obscure interpretation designed to circumvent the license.

    5. Re:Yes by nbd_wl · · Score: 1

      Yes, according to the GPL (look here)

      But I don't know the QPL policy about this.

    6. Re:Yes by nbd_wl · · Score: 1

      Ok, now I know: faq

  44. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by stilborne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why JuK (another music player)? because there wasn't a good playlist centric, simple to use player that integrated well with KDE. now there is. the winamp/XMMS interface is horrid compared to the JuK/iTunes style... of course, for those who prefer XMMS or Noatun, they are still there. i would also suggest using JuK before saying it isn't a good music player. it's actually quite kick-ass. (yes, that's a technical term ;)

    why another email app? in this case there isn't since Kontact uses KMail as a component. there isn't any email code in kontact itself, it's all in KMail which already existed. and why does KMail exist? because there simply aren't any other decent GUI mail clients for KDE.

    the answers are similar for word processing, IM client, etc. the apps in KDE 3 integrate well and offer a good number of features. you'll notice that, by and large, there aren't many duplicated KDE applications. there is usually one, and occasionally two, KDE apps that fill any particular need.

  45. Re:GOOGLE DOWN??. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  46. Re:KDE still sucks by Soothh · · Score: 0

    parent marked as troll, does that mean it was marked by a KDE troll? listen, i know the truth may hurt, but KDE really does suck, its the hard truth, deal with it.

    --
    We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
  47. Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This troll has been done before.

  48. How about getting rid of X-Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always hated X-Windows and wanted it gone and out of my computer. Does the KDE group ever plan on ditching X-Windows?

    1. Re:How about getting rid of X-Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm, what's wrong with X?

  49. Not just 24. Alias does too. by antdude · · Score: 2, Informative

    See my newsgroup thread (KDE seen in Alias episode 11 (A Higher Echelon)) from January 2003.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  50. KDE needs something to compete with Storage. by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    KDE needs to take drastic measures to compete with storage and prepare for the future.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:KDE needs something to compete with Storage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will storage ever actually be released? I seriously doubt it.

      What ever happened to Dashboard? Oh yeah, it's a piece of flying vaporware that nobody has worked on for months.

  51. Re:KDE by Lemmeoutada+Collecti · · Score: 1

    Hey, us Guitarists don't need any more 13 year old 'Talent' hacking on a fine Gibson guitar! Let em hack the planet, if they're up to it. I suggest they start by digging a 7 foot by 3 foot by six foot deep hole.

    --

    You can have it fast, accurate, or pretty. Pick any 2.
  52. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    VERY insightfull comment. Too bad more people don't seem to listen to people like him.

  53. XMMS? Are you out of your mind? by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    XMMS is a mediocre clone of Winamp 2. It gets the job done, sorta, but it's certainly not something I'd hold up as quality software.

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  54. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I bet theres already 100 music players that are half finished and not a single one of them as good as Winamp.

    I most definitely wouldn't use Winamp as an example of a good audio player. Back in the time I used it a lot and even after learning all the necessary keyboard shortcuts I couldn't help thinking that the UI was horrible.

    Then I found foobar2000 and my life became tolerable again... for a moment. Now I have a wonderful audio player that only runs in an OS I happen to very strongly dislike.

  55. Darn, it's BIG! by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

    150 mb just for a GUI with some apps. It's as big as win98 install already.

    Having said that, it looks sweet. Konqueror is getting better every day, and i am looking forward to kopete (don't use 0.8 beta, it's buggy as hell, i reported around 10 big bugs already)

    1. Re:Darn, it's BIG! by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Most of that 150 KB is applications that have relatively little to do with the window manager portion. You can debate the usefulness of some of that, but I think it's well worth the long download.

      Besides, if you don't want to take the time to download it, you can always wait for the update to your distro of choice. This is a beta release, and as such, some effort is expected.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    2. Re:Darn, it's BIG! by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Note to self: preview dammit!

      $last_post =~ s/150 KB/150 MB/;

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    3. Re:Darn, it's BIG! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      150mb and it still looks better, runs faster, all with fewer bugs and crashes, than Windows.

      My old Slackware box runs KDE 3.1.x with the cool transparencies that you can only get in Windows by upgrading to XP.

      With all the mountains of advantage in having GNU Linux+Kde, the size of KDE is a laughably insignificant issue to me.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  56. Doesn't look like a powerbook to me by ratpack91 · · Score: 1

    look! it's a dell

  57. KDE most impressive open source project - ever by KojakBang · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The progress that these guys have made in 5 years and the sheer volume of quality code is simply amazing. What are these guys doing right as compared to all the other projects? They even stick to their development and release schedules better than most commercial companies. And despite everyone calling for the death of C++, KDE is the shining example of what can be accomplished in that language. I seriously doubt it could have been constructed in any other language and produce as quick and relatively error-free code as these guys have produced.

    --
    "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX. We don't believe this to be a coincidence."
  58. I love it by xrayspx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm running Alpha 2, and it is great. Many UI bugs fixed, like now they shrink tabs instead of making you scroll around when there are lots of tabs open.

    I miss "view source" in the context menu on a webpage, and I'm still patiently waiting for some mid-mouse AutoScroll, Opera and Firebird seem to be able to deal with this as meaning "paste" when on a textarea, "scroll" when on plaintext, and "open in new tab" when on a link. I would love to see this in Konq. Konqeror is still my primary browser anyway.

    1. Re:I love it by Micah · · Score: 1

      > I'm still patiently waiting for some mid-mouse AutoScroll, Opera and Firebird seem to be able to deal with this as meaning "paste" when on a textarea

      If you didn't know it, that's standard X behavior. Clicking the middle mouse button in any text entry area will paste the last thing you highlighted with the mouse.

      As far as Firebird goes, I like the middle button auto scrolling, but I'd kind of like to have the Mozilla Seamonkey behavior where you can highlight a URL that is not an HTMl link and middle click it to go there. I haven't found a way to do that in Moz Firebird.

    2. Re:I love it by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out this extension. You just highlight the text, right click it, and select "Open Link in New Tab" (or new window). No its an extra click or two from Mozilla, but I prefer having my middle mouse button open for scrolling the way Firebird does it.

      And I really wish more KDE/Linux applications used the middle mouse button as a scroll wheel without any fancy configuring, such as Konqueror or OpenOffice.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    3. Re:I love it by fault0 · · Score: 1

      > I miss "view source" in the context menu on a webpage

      While it's probably gone forever from the context menus (which have been shortened even more between alpha2 and beta1), someone could write a konqueror plugin to add it to the context menus again. Hell, just take "kuick" from kdeaddons (the konqueror plugin that adds "move to" and "add to" to the context menu), and modify it a little bit and there you go.

    4. Re:I love it by Micah · · Score: 1

      Ok that's cool, but I don't think the two behaviors are mutually exclusive.

      When the middle button is pressed, Firebird could check to see if there is selected text, and if so, if it looks like a URL. If it does, it should open it. If not, it should activate scroll mode.

    5. Re:I love it by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      "scroll" when on plaintext, and "open in new tab" when on a link.

      Actually that would be bad - with Konqueror I can select a url which isn't a link and simply middle-click with the rest of the bunch I have to use the context menu

      Built-in mouse gesture would be sweet =)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    6. Re:I love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Built-in mouse gesture would be sweet =)

      I second that. I would prefer Opera style gestures.
      Now that Mozilla/MozillaFirbird has it i tend to use
      those (and Opera) more than Konq.

  59. You'd be absolutely right, if. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    Microsoft hadn't arranged their car so that if the radio breaks all the tires blow out.

    To gain performance MS has taken what was originally a very elegant modular system with a graphical shell on top of a solid kernel and coded user apps directly into kernel space. See "browser integration," which means that a bug in the browser is a bug in kernel space. See the recent RPC exploit.

    It wasn't meant to be this way, but marketing has made it so, whatever the elegance of the original architecture. It is the reality that must be dealt with.

    In this sense, yes, KDE as a shell on top of the Linux kernel is more secure than the Explorer shell, Internet Explorer, Outlook and Office "wired into" the NT kernel. ( And such a configuration is closer to what the term KDE really means in practice).

    KDE has its own problems of course, so to that extent original poster is perhaps naive. If the radio stops working the windshield wipers stop too, but the tires don't blow out.

    Which means you're also less likely to find yourself carjacked.

    KFG

  60. That isn't Jack's machine by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Informative
    That was the palm-print recognition machine at the prison where the evil terrorist/drug-lord is housed.

    Jack (and the good guys at CTU) have Macs.

  61. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    AC replied to you that XMMS is the Linux version of Winamp.

    I don't believe this to be so. I tried XMMS when it was young, and it seemed to me that they were building it from their own code to be as much like Winamp as possible, from the UI POV.

    XMMS is a direct replacement for Winamp for most people. It works well and plays tunes.

    XMMS is one of the few programs that I actually say "as good as the Windows app" about.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  62. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by azzy · · Score: 1

    I think Shakrai's point was that winamp hasn't been properly released on linux, and so we need others to create clones, etc. Hence we do need the wheel to be reinvented.

  63. Mythmusic.. by msimm · · Score: 3, Informative

    You need Mythtv setup with at least Mythmusic (screenshot). It's perfect for this and it was designed to be easily used with a remote and a television monitor.

    It will play/rip/visualize/navigate your music collection and if your using Debian or Mandrake is just a quick apt/urpmi away (for Mandrake configure urpmi to use Thacs RPM's first, as described on the site).

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Mythmusic.. by proxima · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I heard about mythtv but checked it out long ago when it wasn't as developed. Strange that it didn't show up in my apt-cache searches. I will check it out.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Mythmusic.. by proxima · · Score: 1

      That's why it didn't show up in apt-cache searches, it's not part of Debian (even unstable) yet. Just a source line away though.

      Funny, sometimes it seems that if it's not in the unstable package set I never hear about it =), or maybe the unstable package set is just that large.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    3. Re:Mythmusic.. by msimm · · Score: 1

      Here's a page about it. Looks like he's packaged 0.11 which is one release behind, but worked fine and included the Mythmusic module. There's probably someone out there who's put together a 0.12 (or a latest CVS) binary package, there tends to be debs for just about everything somewhere (Mandrake is probably #2 for availability now).

      Good luck. Its a sweet PVR package too and 0.12 includes a news feeds module so you can get your slash/fix in the lazyboy.

      --
      Quack, quack.
  64. Because its a nice convenience... by msimm · · Score: 1

    What makes Xmms simple is its plug-in arcitecture, not its features. I'm too lazy to count, but Xmms is complicated, its just well designed.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Because its a nice convenience... by advocate_one · · Score: 1
      "What makes Xmms simple is its plug-in arcitecture"

      Precisely... so write a browser plugin for it then... but don't mess with the program itself :)

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  65. Now that Texstar is gone by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    we'll either have to get off our lazy butts and figure out how to do this ourselves or
    we'll have to wait for Mandrake 937.34733e+07283 to get this hot item..

    Hmm, should I wait or get off the pot???

    1. Re:Now that Texstar is gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O.K. - I'll bite.

      Where has texstar gone ????

    2. Re:Now that Texstar is gone by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      He moved on to another job and is no longer making rpms for Mandrake.
      *extreme weeping*

      However the grapevine has it that he's working on a live-on-cd version of Mandrake 9.2 (in the spirit of Knoppix and all tweaked up with all the hot goodies. It's supposed to rock on from what I've heard, will include install to HD scripts too..

  66. I use both every day.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    And IMHO its the fastest, easiest to use hands down. With Goom and Jess visualizing on my TV its just about perfect. Default skin beats W/A and is sleek and easy on the eyes.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:I use both every day.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll agree that it's fast (uses less than 1% cpu on my old 800MHz solaris box) and easy, but it's feature set is exactly that of winamp 2, which is by now about 4 years old (I think, correct me if I'm wrong). Personally, I found musicmatch jukebox on windows to have the best functionality, why can't we have something that good on nix?
      I'm still looking for a decent mp3 player for unix, I'm not even fussed if it's open source or not, as long as it's free (as in beer), and this JuK is ugly.

  67. Bit Rot by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    Great. Just bloody great. I only just took delivery of SuSE 9.0 and now I have to upgrade half of it already. So begins the long decline into terminal bit rot.

    *sigh*.

    1. Re:Bit Rot by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is exactly why I'll wait for the next point release from SUSE. My 8.2 install runs fine. I'll plunk down cash when 9.1 hits the streets with the full release of KDE 3.2.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    2. Re:Bit Rot by ralphclark · · Score: 1

      Yeah but, when 9.1 comes out (and assuming SuSE don't follow Red Hat's lead and just can the consumer releases) what are the chances it'll be closely followed by the release of XFree86 4.3.1, or glibc 2.3, or a radically new and backwards-incompatible gcc compiler, or some such...

    3. Re:Bit Rot by Brane2 · · Score: 0

      ...and that's why I have stopped fooling around with Suse and started using Gentoo...


      One simple "emerge" does it all...

    4. Re:Bit Rot by kitzilla · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always something new coming down the Open Source turnpike. That's the downside of using a rapidly evolving OS, I suppose. As far as SUSE goes, my experience with them has been pretty good. A new version of XFree86 would probably be offered as a patch via Yast's update function, as will the new kernel when it's ready. But I'd prefer to wait until KDE 3.2 is good to go before I buy disks. Red Hat's move really shouldn't surprise anyone. SUSE seems committed to desktop consumer releases, as is Mandrake and a host of others. RH is probably doing the right thing, moving closer to its core business. That will make it easier for the consumer-targeted distros to sell boxes. If RH's abandonment of supported consumer releases teaches us anything, it's the importance of financially supporting our favorite distros and tolerating the bit rot of boxed sets.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    5. Re:Bit Rot by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      If RH's abandonment of supported consumer releases teaches us anything, it's the importance of financially supporting our favorite distros and tolerating the bit rot of boxed sets.

      I wholeheartedly agree. I fail to understand how it is that so many supposedly intelligent people seem to think it's wrong to pay for an open source OS. Every time a new one comes out there are numerous posts on Slashdot either moaning about the lack of free ISO's or complaining bitterly about the $50 price of the boxed set and boasting that they can get it for $5 at Cheapbytes or whatever. Do these people think that distributions just spring out of the ground fully formed?

      If we can't support the distribution publishers with a few dollars now and again, then eventually they will all follow Red Hat and all we'll have left is the perpetually out-of-date Debian, and good old Slackware. If we're lucky.

      This is hardly groundless doom-mongering. Just look at the cashflow problems Mandrake have had, and that's supposed to be one of the popular ones.

      I'm hardly rolling in cash myself (As a contractor in the UK I get taxed to the hilt and I've been out of work for the last five months too) but I do at least understand the potential danger of the "tragedy of the commons". If it's going to come down to a choice between quality packaging and "roll your own distribution from sources", then even though I have 1 megabit broadband and can easly download the whole thing, I'm more than happy to stump up 50 notes each year for another pretty box. Given the voluntary aspect of this I kind of consider it a charitable donation.

      Would that more people thought the same. But so many don't. And if it isn't software, it's music, or online movie downloads. Several people I know - neighbours, friends, work colleagues - on getting a modern computer and broadband internet installed for the first time, they came to me for advice, but all they wanted to know was "where is all the ripped off stuff I can steal?" I truly find this kind of attitude offensive. It's nothing short of parasitism.

  68. Re:Um..Xmms.. BARF! by repetty · · Score: 1

    "For a music player with a good GUI and lots of functionality XMMS is the Linux king."

    Oh, lord, you must be kidding. XMMS is one of the projects that I always point to as an example of how badly an open source development project can go.

    There's probably not a mistake they haven't made. And they revel in it. It's almost a juvenile, masturbatory event.

  69. Screens? by Lispy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "I find your lack of screenshots disturbing." ;-)

  70. Be clear about the terms. by jbn-o · · Score: 3, Insightful
    nukem996 points out "The counter-terrorism unit on TV series '24' went KDE this season, too."

    dot.kde.org's news entry claims

    "Interestingly they used a 3-year-old KDE 1.x desktop. These older icons are made available under a public domain licence."

    There is no such thing as "a public domain license". Putting a copyrighted work in the public domain means forgoing all copyright power for that work. Licenses, by contrast, tell you what you what the terms are for activities regulated by copyright law. Licensed works are still under copyright.

    When I read the KDE art site pointed to by dot.kde.org's article, I can't find the phrase "public domain". There is language that suggests the copyright holders tried to do something similar ("The images inside this directory are COMPLETELY FREE for commercial and non-commercial use." emphasis theirs). To be clear, when you mean the work is in the public domain, say the work is in the public domain. The Creative Commons makes doing this easy now (if you're talking about US copyright law).

  71. Re: We dont need another music player goddamnit! by er_col · · Score: 1

    Well, if you think all music players are half finished and not as good as Winamp, you probably haven't tried KPlayer. At version 0.3 it already is far better than all Winamps together. Or should I say was? Because 0.4 is about to be released, with an excellent playlist support. And best of all, KPlayer is based on the media player.

  72. Sure... by msimm · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to see them busy up the default design too, thats why I like it so much (aside from the slick GUI design).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  73. partial retraction by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

    I just realized that the Qt license is for commercial use, not closed source use. In this case it isn't much an ethical thing as a if-you-make-money-with-this-pay-us thing, which does make sense to me.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  74. Sorry, couldn't resist.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Surely you mean 9.3734733e+7285 ?

  75. Matter of opinion.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    I guess the Xmms dev team could be faulted for not satisfying everyone all of the time, but that would be going a little too far. If you really hate the GUI's for so many appliactions (I'd agree with you on some and disagree on others) maybe try the command line app splay. Its got no GUI to compain of, but it sounds better then any other app I've used on a computer. Does shuffle or non shuffle, ^C to exit. Its a surprisingly nice little player.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Matter of opinion.. by Per+Cederberg · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe my criticism sounded a bit harsh. Didn't mean to say that I hate these apps, rather that I see some annoying issues with them. I'll keep using them until something better comes along (and it looks like it will).

      What baffles me is that the developers don't seem to realize that they are having serious UI issues. But then again, maybe they like the idea of being special and extraordinary (in whatever way). Makes people spend more time with their app (although some of it might be cursing).

      Many thanks for the splay tip!

  76. split market by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Why do I have to choose between KDE and GNOME? What if I want the latest software from each on my desktop? When somebody comes up with a layer that unifies them into one app GUI environment, the entire unified installed base will be available for app developers, like Win32 under Win98, Win2K and WinXP.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:split market by stfrn · · Score: 1

      Uhm, you choice the window manager, which has no effect on apps. Whichever window manager you choice you can use any app, as they just call the library they need. Win32 on the other hand doens't give the choice of a window manager, you use the one given to you.

      --
      "It'll be like stealing candy from a baby... why, that look like a lark!" - Mr. Burns.
    2. Re:split market by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

      You can run KDE apps in Gnome, and vice versa. For example, I regularly use GIMP from within KDE.

    3. Re:split market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Even if they standardize on as many fronts as they can, coders will still have to write two versions of quite a lot of things (that is, if they're only writing for GTK2 and KDE)

      For example, KDE apps use left-to-right button order. GTK2 apps use flowchart/wizard button order. You'd need to query the current environment and display a different UI depending on what you found. And frankly, that's not very unified.

      Win32 isn't unified because everyone decided it was the way to go. It's unified because Microsoft decided it was the right way to go. You're just not going to get 100% GUI unification across all OSes in a competitive market.

    4. Re:split market by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Heh. That's funny was hell. There are several toolkits for Windows as well. In fact, its almost impossible to use a "pure" Windows desktop, because some popular Microsoft apps (notably, Office) use different toolkits. The main thing is that most Windows toolkits look and behave similarly, while GTK+ and Qt don't. However, that's exactly what the freedesktop.org project is trying to do!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:split market by pclminion · · Score: 1
      Uhm, you choice the window manager, which has no effect on apps.

      No. That's not what KDE and Gnome are. Both KDE and Gnome have lots of "middleware" running the background to facilitate communication between applications and to provide the integration that makes the desktop seem so cohesive. Things like application configuration (like the Windows registry), enhanced drag-and-drop, etc.

      On KDE, this is called MCOP, DCOP, sycoca, etc. Gnome has analogous (yet different) layers. Both KDE and Gnome are much more than simple window managers.

      Have you ever started a KDE program while running a non-KDE window manager like TWM? It runs fine, but first it has to launch about a dozen "support" processes to set everything up to make it look like KDE is running.

  77. Seen in 24 series 2 as well by Elitist+Snob · · Score: 1

    In the final (or possibly penultimate) episode, you see KMail on Michelle's desktop. I noticed this while watching the DVD the other day. And no, I didn't need to go and freeze-frame it or anything.

  78. Feature-set is extended.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    By the plugins available. Like the Audioscrobbler for relational rating, or oddcast/blackice for streaming, or the sound enhancing plugins for 4Front Technologies and of course the great visual plugins like Goom or Jess.

    I'm sure there are plently of additional features people would like and plugins aren't the answer to everything, but as a music/media player it is just what I need and its a real pleasure to use. The bigger players seem like bloatware to me and what they add in gawdy buttons doesn't actually seem to enhance my experience.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Feature-set is extended.. by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

      You do know that for every XMMS plugin, there are probably 10 for Winamp 2 don't you?

      My biggest beef with XMMS is the playlist handlings, and more specifically the fact that there is no way to have a 'tree' type structure. I've got my entire collection (~450 cds) ripped, and finding a specific track is a pain as a single pixel in the scroll bar is like 1.5 screens in the playlist. Compare to iTunes, where it's all broken down by genre / artist / album, and thus finding what I want, or, for instance, random play out of only a single artist / genre is trivial.

      XMMS works ok if all you want is random play over all your files and pretty pictures to gaze at, but it is no where near as useful as iTunes. Zinf is actually closer to the feature set I'm after, but it's...crashey.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    2. Re:Feature-set is extended.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do know about the 'J'ump functionality in the playlist for both XMMS and Winamp, right?

  79. Excellent question!! by Balinares · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > What are these guys doing right as compared to all the
    > other projects?

    Yes, this is an -excellent- question.
    My take on it is:

    1) They consistently pick the best tool for the job, regardless of ideology (see Qt);
    2) They put a considerable amount of engineering work in under-the-hood infrastructure design;
    3) While others bicker or troll, they code.

    Simple as that, really. I'm very, very happy that they proved and keep proving that good engineering is how you make the damn best software out there. In this world of quick hacks and half-assed kludges and people who think themselves programmers because they got their VB project to compile, this is quite comforting for old asses like me...

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    1. Re:Excellent question!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Linus put it best recently..

      "But for some reason I just noticed that the KDE people consider it more important to have it working, and sane. Instead of trying to aim for perfection, which the Gnome people are trying to do."

      replace gnome with pretty much all open software projects, and there you go. release often and release early! it keeps developers and users interested in your product.

  80. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

    Ok, so what USEFUL application would you like to see as part of the KDE system that doesn't currently exist? Something scientific? A KDE photo editor like Gimp or Photoshop?

    Secondly, if there's an itch that's bothering you, then scratch it. There's no barrier to entry. The code's all right there. KDevelop would even help you if you understand the programming language necessary. If you can't write it, but feel like you NEED it, pay someone to write it for you. Just realize that whining on /. isn't going to fix the problem.

    Or, failing all that, go to KDE bugs page and fill out a request for your USEFUL feature. Maybe someone on the development teams will decide that you're correct and implement the feature.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  81. NP.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    Came across it in Linux Journal years ago and haven't come across a more satifying player yet. For player integration wouldn't something like Gstreamer be good? I don't use the larger desktop managers so I don't have much experience (go Blackbox!), but it seems that would (could?) be more tightly integrated (file playback on mouse over, etc).

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:NP.. by Per+Cederberg · · Score: 1

      Interesting you should mention GStreamer... It's just a multimedia framework, but there are already some interesting apps using it.

      Funny thing is, one of them seems to be JuK... But it looks like Rythmbox is more for me (as I'm kind of into Gnome).

  82. The Sisters of Mercy by Spider[DAC] · · Score: 1

    Nope.
    The song "Vision Thing" by The Sisters of Mercy. It's even from the album "Vision Thing" .

    --
    I didn't do this, now did I?
    1. Re:The Sisters of Mercy by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      kewl, thx

  83. Clutter? by Vicegrip · · Score: 1

    Interestingly I count 14 widgets in the Juk pic and 14 widgets in itune.

    Not counting grid columns or menus.

    Aside: why so many people turn on the flameguns on slashdot whenever a KDE project tries to do something cool? It's almost as though people feel threatened or something; it is really getting annoying.

    --
    Do not spread "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0" over the internet, thank you.
    1. Re:Clutter? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      It's almost as though people feel threatened or something

      It means that KDE is winning. What it's winning has yet to be determined...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  84. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) you should consider stopping posting with this name, it is very offensive. It assumes you subscribe to nazi ideology.
    2) check out kstars, it's one of the top astronomical programs available and it's free. So maybe you don't care about that but KDE has massive amounts of extremely useful applications.

  85. Speedwise.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    Xmms takes the cake. Fast, sleek, extensable and easy to use. All the benifits of Winamp without the bad code.

    --
    Quack, quack.
    1. Re:Speedwise.. by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Xmms takes the cake. Fast, sleek, extensable and easy to use. All the benifits of Winamp without the bad code.

      Yeah, ok. I use XMMS, I like it. I wouldn't say it's the best thing in the world, though.

      XMMS is good for when you have a huge playlist, and you just want to play your music and ignore your music player while you do other work. XMMS isn't that good if you have different playlists for different moods that you're in, or maybe sometimes you just only want to hear the songs that you really like. iTunes is great in that department, and Rhythmbox is catching up.

      RB just has to fix a few small annoyances that I have with it, and I'll start using it as my primary music player.

      And I'll be trying out JuK, too, I've never heard of it before today.

    2. Re:Speedwise.. by msimm · · Score: 1

      And I'll be trying out JuK, too, I've never heard of it before today.

      Same with Rythmbox for me. I've been using Xmms for so long, Zinf/Freeamp was OK because of the playlist manager, but its so unstable I can't use it regularly without losing patience.

      I'll trade your recommendatoin with a recommendation for Legends its a new freeware FPS game for Linux and Windows that is way beyond anything I've seen released for free before. Give it a shot. Juk??! Pffft!

      --
      Quack, quack.
  86. Even uglier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This site is way worse...

  87. Re:Hello KDE? 1993 called.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    plz send me a computer so i can run an osx computer made by ur fellow apple hippez.

  88. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by Selecter · · Score: 0

    Why the hell do Mac users need Winamp? Just the name WIN-amp would make em barf.

  89. A Vim KPart! by nihilogos · · Score: 1

    I might just have to try one of these newfangled "desktop" thingies.

    --
    :wq
  90. Konstruct A Beta by DeadBugs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Use Konstruct to easily install KDE (including betas).

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:Konstruct A Beta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, use Debian

  91. +1 Informative by handy_vandal · · Score: 1


    Re:Kontact: how much like Outlook ...?

    Not much at all. The applications in Kontact are not really integrated, they just live in the same window, sort of like tabs in konqueror and mozilla.


    Thanks.

    --
    -kgj
  92. Open Source! by Asdex · · Score: 1

    > So, on iTunes, I have 3 control buttons, a pretty
    > status meter, and a search field. That is it.


    Yes, that's it. Either it's enought for you or you have a problem.

    > Now look at JuK. There is a crapload of buttons
    > making the interface completely suck.


    You don't have to use those buttons. You can remove them or add new ones.

    It would be cool if you could clean the JuK toolbar and send the patch (or screenshot) to the Juk developers.

    That's the reason for a beta version!

  93. Good one. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    Next you should welcome me as your cliche comment posting overlord.

    What I posted was an insightful comment pointing out some of the flaws in JuK. Yes, I don't currently use it. No, I'm not going to submit patches because iTunes satisfies my needs. However, I'm not opposed to JuK and if it improves greatly, I will consider using it. If the developers are paying attention, they will address some of the issues I raised. It is called constructive criticism, and it is a good thing. You however, apparently just prefer to troll, and I'll take the bait in defense of myself.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  94. Re:KDE still sucks by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

    Eh. I like it. I dunno if this occurs to a lot of you techo Nazis and techo terrorists (that one is especially for you) but one size doesn't fit all and one man's meat is another man's poison. These old sayings exist because it's a commonplace problem.

    I've never been able to figure out the open source community (or free software community or Linux community or whatever label you want to generically stick on them, whoever they are) simultaneously creates choice, freedom and... elitist, snob assholes who have to shit talk eveyr last piece of software they don't use or don't like.

    I mean geez, my 88 Volvo was the perfect car. It was a wagon so I had a lot of room, could seat five, it got good gas mileage. It wasn't much to look at but as all "1337" types know, if it looks good it must be polished shit. I mean... EVERYONE KNOWS THAT!

    By that right, all other cars blow. Especially those new Vipers. They're proof that Dodge can polish a turd! I mean... they can't even seat as many as my old car and it can't haul as much as my truck. It's just for rick pricks with small penises who have too much money that they obviously don't deserve. Everyone knows people who have a lot of money don't deserve it, right?

    I like KDE a lot. I use it daily. In fact, it's one of the primary reasons I use Linux. I used to use Gnome but I liked KDE better because EVERYONE KNOWS Gnome sucks right? (Although, it's actually because my preferences obviously differ from Gnome people's and this is why choice is good.)

    Man... you sideline software critics piss me off.

  95. here's the reason by CanadaDave · · Score: 1

    I think the developers of the software for that TV show just wanted to appear on slashdot.

  96. Re:We dont need another music player goddamnit! by treke · · Score: 1

    Actually.... there was a release of a Linux port of WinAmp. They never maintained it though.

  97. NeWS by spitzak · · Score: 1

    Don't forget NeWS, which did the PostScript GUI much better (everything was done with postscript, while DPS uses other calls to create windows and manage events). NeWS was also out much earlier and was enormously easier to modify the toolkit on as it was all in PostScript.

  98. Interface Good, Virus Bad by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    I would actually hope is *is* like Outlook. Outlook has a great user interface minus the damn IMAP pausing bug.

    You're right, of course. Credit where it's due: Microsoft knows how to make interfaces, some of them are great. (Arguably, interfaces are Microsoft's main business: interface design is where programming meets content.)

    When I said those Bad Things about Outlook, I was thinking of Outlook viruses ... also, of course, the karma whoring -- backhanding a Microsoft product, easy way to get modded up Funny ....

    --
    -kgj
  99. AHHH!! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 2, Funny
    When I look at it, then browse back to Slashdot, I can still see their angry-fruit-salad in reverse video.

    DAMN YOU VISUAL PERSISTENCE!

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  100. Enjoy it while it lasts, kids! by Baloo+Ursidae · · Score: 1

    Because when Microsoft finally releases Longhorn in 2005, barring further delay, you'll really see something mediocre released.

    --
    Help us build a better map!
  101. Unclear, please explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi there, I have a question. It is not clear to me, if u develop a commercial application for kde, don't u build it against kdelibs? I mean, to develop a commercial application for kde do u need to buy a qt licence or u need that just if u are developing a qt-based application? Ex TheKompany at the beginning of their history were developing kde apps than they went to pure qt applications, were they required, at the beginning to buy a qt licence for they kde based work?

  102. Don't assume your local law applies! by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 1

    # There is no such thing as "a public domain
    # license". Putting a copyrighted work in the public
    # domain means forgoing all copyright power for that
    # work.

    This is not possible in German copyright law. A creator always keeps the Urheberrecht (author right which is larger than the copy right). A creation always has a creator.

    The only way to emulate the Angloamerican concept of "public domain" is to give a free licence to the public. This could very well be called a "public domain license".

    German law applies because the icons were made in Germany by a German.

    --
    Moritz
  103. You forgot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac fan: "It still looks and behaves exactly like WindowsXP and is therefore not ready for the Desktop!"

  104. MOD PARENT UP! by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

    The problem isn't that we have different toolkits, the problem is that we aren't able to simply set our preferences in the KDE/GNOME control center and they're then applied to all apps

    --
    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  105. Music software by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

    Fruityloop for Linux, howabout Kloop.

    --
    People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
    1. Re:Music software by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm not into audio editing, but Fruityloop looks like Audacity on steroids. Maybe make some suggestions to the Audacity team as to features that exist in Fruityloop that you think Audacity could use?

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    2. Re:Music software by Adolph_Hitler · · Score: 1

      its not even the same type of software, the audacity people arent even in the same league, this is like comparing mozilla composer to microsoft visual studio.

      --
      People don't exist to serve systems, systems exist to serve people.
  106. 3.2 on suse 8.2 help by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    I've been running 3.2 alpha1 on my primary desktop since it was released and haven't had any real problems (thank you konstruct). Tonight I grabbed 3.2b1 RPMS for SuSE and put it on a laptop I just built, and I seem to be having the same problems as everyone else, with only "Menu Settings" showing up in kcontrol.

    So aside from not being able to change anything :-), everything looks great. Not much surprising since I've been using alpha1 anyway, but very nice and quick. Although I've got nothing to benchmark it against on this laptop.

    Any workarounds for the kcontol menu issue, besides installing desktop-data-SuSE-8.2.99-61.noarch, which didn't work?