Slashdot Mirror


Dcube: Portable Audio With Ogg And A Scroll Wheel

Slowtreme writes "There have been many attempts recently to cash in on Apple's iPod success. Napster, Dell, and others have made iPod clones. This Korean Dcube looks like they are going all out. With 1.5 gig, Ogg and MP3 support, grey scale display, USB2.0, wireless, FM radio, it looks like a nice device. Most noticeable however is the scroll wheel, Apple holds patents (pending) on scroll wheel design. How much noise will this make?" (The Napster-branded one is actually a Samsung product; Samsung, too, is supporting Ogg Vorbis in some models, though not in that one.)

556 comments

  1. Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by corebreech · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I mean, c'mon... IT'S A WHEEL!!!

    We've been using wheels for input since, well, since forever! Those big round things that have been on ships for centuries and centuries? They're wheels! They translate rotation into linear input. What's that thing on the iPod? It's a wheel! It translates rotation into linear input!

    Hello???

    Fucking Steve Jobs thinks he's patented the fucking wheel! And you know who's to blame? That other fucking idiot, Jeff Bezos, with the infinitely moronic One-Click patent. The two dufuses are slugging it out, vying to be the one who holds the world's most ridiculous patent!

    None of this would be possible if it weren't for the fact that the people working at the USPTO seem to have been genetically engineered to be utterly devoid of critical thinking skills! I mean, hiring the merely stupid would not do, because at least then there's a chance of a ridiculous idea being rejected. It's like we cross-bred a human being with a rock, gave it a diploma for knowing how to inhale before exhaling, and then shipped the result off to Washington so it could have an "APPROVED" stamp crazy-glued into it's rat-like claw!

    And I'm paying taxes for this???

    ENOUGH ALREADY!!!

    1. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by rev063 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's not just a wheel. The wheel is just the physical interface. There's also the way it scrolls through long lists quickly, and the way it interacts with the other buttons, that make it such a great and unique piece of interface design.

      All the best interface designs are obvious ... in retrospect. You can't just say "It's a wheel!" without recognizing the enormous amount of effort and care that went into its design and engineering.

      The wheel is what makes the iPod unique, and it deserves its success because of it. This is one of the good uses of patents, in the sense that it gives a manufacturer a temporary monopoly as a reward for innovative design, and will hopefully spur other innovative designs in the iPod comptetitors. Seems like a good thing to me.

    2. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1

      I thought Apples patent related to the Solid State scroll wheel (no moving parts). Having no moving parts is a novel idea and should probably be allowed a patent. Now, I'm not sure if the scroll wheel in this device has moving parts, as my Korean isn't quite up to scratch, but if it doesn't and they haven't licenced it I'm sure they'll be hearing from Apple.

    3. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      How is that different than a scroll wheel on a mouse?

    4. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      No moving parts...You mean just like the touchpad on laptops?

    5. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't just say "It's a wheel!" without recognizing the enormous amount of effort and care that went into its design and engineering.

      What are you, on crack? IT'S A FUCKING WHEEL YOU FUCKING RETARD!!! How much effort and care did Apple put into designing THE FUCKING WHEEL??? ZERO!!!

      Let me guess, you're a Mac user.

    6. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by AndIWonderIfIWonder · · Score: 1

      Yep, but in a circle with a button in the middle, acting as a scroll wheel.

    7. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I thought Apples patent related to the Solid State scroll wheel (no moving parts).
      ... you mean like the B&O "BeoCom" line of phones that have been around for at least 6-7 years?
    8. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by corebreech · · Score: 1

      So by painting a picture of a circle on a track pad, you think you should get a patent?

    9. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's also the way it scrolls through long lists quickly, and the way it interacts with the other buttons, that make it such a great and unique piece of interface design.

      Hmmm.... just like to jog dial on countless other electronic devices?

      Sure the wheel is a good idea, but it's hardly original. And it's not really a major innovation either, more of an evolution. Ever heard of Pong?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    10. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Captain+Tripps · · Score: 1

      I agree that this is one of the more reasonable patents to be mentioned on Slashdot, and it does make sense for Apple to have some temporary protection against knock-offs. But 20 years? By the time this patent expires, who knows what portable music players will be like.

    11. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Because in this case, the wheel is used as the primary navigation system to select and move through the menu and settings. Though I haven't read the patent, I'm sure it's very specific to it's application in a portable music player. Much like I'm sure the patent on the mouse scroll wheel is specific to it's application on a computer interface.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    12. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Gropo · · Score: 2, Informative
      And I could make a portable music player with a plastic fish pasted onto it that lip-synched all the songs played on it, and that would be unique too, but it doesn't mean I get to patent the stupid thing.
      Actually, yes it does.
      --
      I hate Grammar Nazi's
    13. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      And I could make a portable music player with a plastic fish pasted onto it that lip-synched all the songs played on it, and that would be unique too, but it doesn't mean I get to patent the stupid thing.


      Actualy, I'm sure you could patent it.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    14. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      No, because that isn't how it works. The wheel pad will not respond to motion that moves radialy, only motion that moves arround the circle. Likewise, unlike a trackpad, it registers continuous motion, there is no need to stop at the edge and reposition your finger.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    15. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by 3Daemon · · Score: 0

      I do think you have some valid points, but I have a few objections none the less.

      The way of using a rotating device (or an emulation of something rotating) to serve as input is not exactly new (example: JOG-wheels on VCR'S).

      And in addition, the "touch-zone" way it is done, is not exactly new either. I have a very old (perhaps 10-20 yrs) Bang&Olufsen casette deck wich has an identical "no-buttons" interface. (it does not have slide-zones though, but that laptop mousepads are an example of those).

      The only possibly novel thing is the sum of it all, as done on the IPod. I don't really se how that should warrant a patent.

      IANAL, but I would assume their design will fall under copyright (or maybe it's trademark), and that is all the legal protection I think the scroll-wheel deserves. Apple could then sue somebody for making a "confusingly similar" MP3-player, but they shouldn't be able to ban competitors from utilising the "buttonless" design.

    16. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by _Swank · · Score: 1

      and if you had a wheel that didn't MOVE and wasn't transferring ANY rotational motion (it's like those touchpads on laptops and you move your finger around it in a circular fashion and...) then it WOULD be unique AND patentable. it's a 'Touch Wheel' not a 'Scroll Wheel'

      second, the way it does convert your finger motion into actually navigating the menus IS also unique. if i have a large list and circle the touch wheel slowly, it steps through them. if i circle more quickly, it moves through the list more quickly. however, it's not a linear relationship, it is related to the number of items in the list and the speed you circle the pad (and not linearly). scroll wheels on my mouse and any mouse i've ever used have never acted this way, one click is always 3 lines (or something similar)

    17. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      I would be willing ot bet that the important distiction is that pong (IIRC) used a knob while the iPod actualy uses a wheel. Sure it's a petty distiction, but it's these types of distictions that make things work.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    18. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I can tell from the Korean (They don't actually say that it has no moving parts), they DO compair it to a touch pad on a laptop.

    19. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Therlin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bullshit! IT IS JUST A WHEEL! The way it scrolls through long lists quickly, it's no different than any other application where a wheel is used to translate rotational motion into linear input.

      Have you USED it? It's not the same as a mouse wheel or other wheels. You can move the wheel the same distance and it goes through the list at different speeds depending on how quickly, or how slowly, you move. You can move the wheel 2 inches and go through either 5 songs, or 100, depending on the speed.

      It's not just the fact that it's a wheel, it's how it interacts with the interface.

    20. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      I would be willing ot bet that the important distiction is that pong (IIRC) used a knob while the iPod actualy uses a wheel.

      My point was that the ipod's wheel design is simply an incremental change from other devices. You can't take an idea that's already out there in the marketplace, change one little thing, and patent it.

      (Well you can, but the patent will be tossed out if it's ever challenged)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    21. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by corebreech · · Score: 1

      The track pad can be easily programmed to behave in just this manner. Indeed, it depends on the software being used... in fact, I think this very approach was used by Strata3D to better allow for the manipulation of objects in 3D space.

      It's stylish, it's useful, it's simple... but it isn't original. It's a wheel! And whether it's solid-state or made out of oak, it is still the same concept, a concept that has been with us for hundreds of years.

    22. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by corebreech · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've used it. It's a nice device.

      I'm not arguing whether it is nice or not. I'm simply saying that it doesn't deserve a patent. I mean, c'mon, it's a wheel! People need to start getting a grip on reality here.

      The fact that it responds differently to the rate of motion isn't original either. This is a tried-and-proven technique that goes all the way back to DOS, if not earlier.

    23. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok we shall call this IP Law 101. To start off, I haven't read Apple's patent application or any of the patents associated with the features you mention; however, I can still tell you how the law works.

      You make a very valid point in that many of the features have been used before but that doesn't mean the patent is invalid. One of the ways to invalidate a patent is to show prior art; however, the prior arts has to come from a single invetion. This means that every single claim found in the patent has to be in the same piece of prior art. You can't just piece things together.

      Think about it, if I find a way to combine two other inventions in a way that has never been done before then I've created another invention. Now this doesn't mean that I can make, use or sell that invetion per se (if the two inventions I used to make mine are still covered I have to make a deal with the holders of said patents before producing mine but I can still prevent others from making, selling, or using my patent).

      I love it when people start spewing about IP law without actually knowing anything about it. Even someone who has taken a single IP or tech law course would know about these things.

    24. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Dunno if this might be prior art...but, I had a Mitsubishi VCR UD-??, that had both on the remote and the unit...a jog shuttle, that not only did the video..but, would work on the menu system too I believe. And it was a wheel much like this...or at least similar...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    25. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That still doesn't explain why they should have a fscking patent on it. It's just a wheel and/or touchpad.

    26. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      Just like variable acceleration using the MS-DOS logitech mouse drivers from the late 80's early 90's?

      Not new, not unique, not deserving of a patent.

    27. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by herulach · · Score: 1

      Sure, its not just a wheel, but i had a minidisc player that used a wheel for input ages before the iPod even came out, (we're talking 6 years, and i doubt it was a brand new model when i bought it). Its main use was for adding names to tracks, although IIRC you could use it for changing tracks etc.

      Admittedly it wasnt snazzy and recessed like on the ipod, more like those you get round the outside of some watches, but i would hardly call changing the finish and recessing something innovation.

    28. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > And I could make a portable music player with a
      > plastic fish pasted onto it that lip-synched
      > all the songs played on it, and that would be
      > unique too, but it doesn't mean I get to patent
      > the stupid thing.

      But if you do, let me know and I'll buy one from you.

    29. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by cft_128 · · Score: 1
      Hmmm.... just like to jog dial on countless other electronic devices?
      That would be patented by Sony IIRC (the ones on the side of phones and their laptops that select items from a list). I think what apple is patented is not the wheel/scroll interface but the particular configuration of the wheel.. you do not scroll it by grasping it (pong) or by thumbing the edge of the wheel (scroll mouse, the sony jog dial) but by spinning the wheel from the face to select from a list.
      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    30. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      Are you retarded? this is one of the FEW things that deserve a patent.

      just because it uses a common design (the wheel) does not mean that its application is not patantable. infact, this is the exact kind of inovative work that the patent system was set up for.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    31. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a fucking moron.

    32. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Menus similar in function to iPod's have been around for quite a while. I forget the name of the particular method, but it's not really all that innovative. It's been around for at least 20 years.

      Take the Hotbox interface for Maya, for example. It's a menu that pops up when you press the space bar. Everything is layed out in a circle, you hover your mouse over one menu, and submenu pops up, or an action is done. It's a very quick way to work things once you've gotten used to it.

      This seems exactly the same as iPod's interface, except the wheel motion is translated onto a linear menu. Exactly the same if you stretched Maya's circular menu into a line of menus.

    33. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by topologist · · Score: 1

      Love your signature :-) Hark, here comes the Macbeth troll!

    34. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solid-state control wheels have been with us for a hundred years!? Zonkers!

    35. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " It's not just a wheel. The wheel is just the physical interface. There's also the way it scrolls through long lists quickly, and the way it interacts with the other buttons, that make it such a great and unique piece of interface design."

      So /. is against software patents, unless Apple files them? Come on. The grandparent is right. File this one under obvious.

    36. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by CrowScape · · Score: 1

      Well, you just described a jog-shuttle that has been used in video editing since video has been around. So if that's really what Apple has a patent on, then it is rediculous. However, others here have been saying that you don't move the wheel, you simply touch it, so it's a touch pad designed to work like a jog-shuttle, which might not be a totally idiotic patent, just a mostly idiotic one.

      --
      common sense: noun
      What those who are ignorant of the subject matter think; usually wrong.
    37. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So isn't a laptop, which can be considered a portable music play, with a mouse having a scroll wheel, prior art?

    38. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      It's my understanding that it's these subtle differences that allow people to make generic versions of otherwise patented products. I'm not saying it isn't a stupid way of handling things, but c'est la vie

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    39. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      So by your logic, a mouse and a trackball and a trackpad are all the same thing? After all, they're all devices that translate lateral had motions into onscreen movement for navigation of a computer system.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    40. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Because it's a functionaly different design. If you were today to invent a plastic as light and thin as silk but with the stregth of steel,you could patent it, despite plastic already being invented.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    41. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      No, a laptop is not a portable music player. It can be used as one, but it is not one. You're trying to say novacaine isn't original because people have used anesthesia to make you not feel pain.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    42. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Rotary phone.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    43. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      Not really.... iPod dial lets you choose from a virtual list that could not possible fit in the space provided by allowing more rotations, while the rotary action of the phone is a side effect of the technology needed to transmit the selection, not to allow you to select from an arbitrarily large list.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    44. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by quintesse · · Score: 1

      I've got a very old remote control lying here for a Grundig video recorder that has exactly the same "wheel" to control fast forward and rewind (with variable speed).

    45. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a touch pad, not a moving-parts wheel.

    46. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      but with no list selection. I believe its the whole combination that is patented, not just the wheel itself.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    47. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by corebreech · · Score: 1

      Check this out.

      He first asks:

      Are you retarded?

      And then goes on to say the following:

      this is one of the FEW things that deserve a patent. just because it uses a common design (the wheel) does not mean that its application is not patantable.

      So we get to patent things that use a common design, i.e., we get to patent things that have already been invented. It's been used for hundreds of years--no, strike that, it's been used for fucking millenia--but hey, it's Steve Jobs, so, like, let's all bend over.

      You know, the tragic thing is that Apple keeps getting all this applause for innovation, but I can't think of a single idea they've contributed to the industry. Not one. Everything has been ripped off from others. *Everything.*

      Microsoft does the same thing, sure, but they don't get away with claiming they innovate. Apple does.

      Why is that?

    48. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      And rotary phone has three-letter "menu items" associated with the digits. Not to mention radio tuning with "linear menu" of stations, multimeters with large number of positions for a single knob, and loads and loads of other devices that implement the same idea in all its versions -- none of them considered worthy to be patented.

      Now suddenly there is a trivial variation, and it's patentable while the rest of things weren't? This is just ridiculous.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    49. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      No one said the those were not patentable when they were invented - they might have been at the time. It has been quite a while for those inventions and they would be out of patent now if even if they had been patented.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    50. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      As I posted in reply to another post, consider the motion you use when scrolling through a long document using a scroll wheel on a mouse. It's not a fluid motion; you turn the wheel a little, you lift your finger, you turn the wheel a little more. Turn, lift, turn, lift. On the iPod, you move your finger in a complete circle, thus allowing a continuous and fluid motion. It takes just a moment of playing with the iPod to appreciate this. Head to a store that sells iPods (Apple Store, Target, CompUSA, etc.) and test drive one. Or, heck, just move your finger in a circle on your desk, and you'll immediately see the difference. The same thing applies to jog dials that other people have hinted at. Dell might not get the difference, but users sure do.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    51. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by jimbolaya · · Score: 1
      Is it possible, just possible, that maybe you're missing something here? Maybe the effort is a bit more complex than you imagined?

      If it was as simple as you think, why didn't somebody else come up with the idea? Heck, why didn't you come up with a device using such an interface?

      Listen, it's so easy to look at a patented device, and say, duh, that's so obvious! Of course it's obvious, once you've seen the idea. But computers have been around for decades, and yet we've only had the iPod and it's scroll-wheel interface for a few years.

      It's the easily-copied ideas that need patent protection the most. Consider Eli Whitney and his cotton gin. Again, an idea that looks obvious, once you've seen it, and mechanically, a pretty simple device. And yet, farmers went for centuries without it. Once Whitney brought it to the market, it could be easily copied. And it was. Poor Mr. Whitney couldn't profit off of his invention, and spent more defending his patent against copy-cats than he ever made selling it. As a direct result of these copies, patent law was revised to offer inventors better protection.

      Reject the Slashdot party line, and realize that patents are valuable because they encourage invention by allowing inventors to profit from their work and innovation.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    52. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by DuffMeister · · Score: 1

      More like 4 years ago. I bought this minidisc (Aiwa AM-F70) in '99 complete with scroll wheel. If this isn't prior art, I don't know what is:

      http://www.minidisc.org/aiwa-web/amf70.html

    53. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Perhaps Apple's patent is specific enough as to differentiate between that design and what Apple has done?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    54. Re:Apple patent on scroll wheel is ridiculous by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's more like he's saying novocain isn't original because people could have used a large rock to knock a patient out during oral surgery.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  2. FireWire by mpost4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would like to see more MP3 makers use FireWire. I speed of updates is very nice. When I got my iPod my whole mp3 collection was on it in less then 20 minutes. (ok I have a small 10Gb collection) But with speeds like this I can run a program off of it, or store large data files off of it. Also the iPod is more then just a mp3/aac/what ever player, it makes a great portable hard drive. I don't use the Pim stuff off of it because I have a good Palm, but that is another story.

    1. Re:FireWire by a_timid_mouse · · Score: 0

      Isn't USB 2.0 faster than first-generation firewire? I think USB 2.0 runs at 480mbps and firewire runs at 400mbps. So you're better off with USB 2.0 than with the original firewire. (I hear there is firewire 800mbps, but it's only available on very new systems)

    2. Re:FireWire by tweakt · · Score: 0, Informative
      It already has USB 2.0 which is just as good.

      USB 2.0 == 480Mbit/s
      Firewire == 400Mbit/s

    3. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firewire/usb2 speeds may be nice, but don't get caught off guard when the wire doesn't match the drive.

      ie:
      http://www.thinkgeek.com/computing/drives/5 ad4/

      * USB 2.0 Certified with transfer rate up to 480 Mbps (40x faster than USB 1.1)
      * Transfer Rate: up to 16 MB/s

      thats great that if it has a fast wire, but can the drive(s) actually keep up with that speed? or will it be about like plugging an extrnal 56k modem into my usb2 port?

    4. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      +5 interesting? Errr.....OK.

      *I* would like to see more MP3 makers use USB2.0. It's faster than any MP3 player's hard drive can transfer data, so anything faster is superfluous. Virtually every computer in the world has USB2.0, so you can plug it in anywhere. Firewire's advantages are wasted on MP3 players, and it's not on many machines, so you get no speed advantage, and it won't work on at least 4 out of 5 machines.

    5. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewire - 400 Mbps
      USB 2.0 - 480 Mbps
      Just as fast, and there are no fees, good luck

      Apple, who owns the patents for FireWire, killed its Golden Goose by demanding a license fee of several dollars for each PC, which Intel and most computer makers found to be economically untenable. This opened the door for USB. Intel gave the USB technology to their OEM partners royalty-free (as they do today), and IEEE 1394-FireWire-was quietly dropped from the PC 98 specification. Apple backed off their high-priced position, down to today's 25-per-PC license fee, but the damage was done. http://www.pcstats.com/articleview.cfm?articleID=1 104

    6. Re:FireWire by Durandal64 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Too bad the average sustained transfer rates for USB 2.0 are far lower than those of FireWire, despite the peak rate being higher.

    7. Re:FireWire by mbbac · · Score: 1

      480mbps is USB's peak. 400mbps is what FireWire delivers to the iPod consistantly.

      I wonder if the 4th generation iPod will have FireWire 800...

      --

      mbbac

    8. Re:FireWire by mpost4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.macspeedzone.com/archive/5.0/usbcompari son.html
      up to 800Mbps

    9. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was, by no means a truly scientific test, but at work we did a rough and tumble copy of a 1 gig (ish) folder using our portable drive with USB2 and firewire (1st gen). The USB2 clocked in at around 37 sec while the firewire clocked in at about 42 seconds.

      Not a TC, but just curious where you get your numbers...

    10. Re:FireWire by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 4, Informative

      USB 2.0 has a higher peak speed than Firewire 400, but Firewire sustains higher speeds, so it works out to be faster at copying large amounts of data.

    11. Re:FireWire by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't USB 2.0 faster than first-generation firewire? I think USB 2.0 runs at 480mbps and firewire runs at 400mbps.

      That's the theoretical maximum output, never actually matched in real life. Real life benchmarks usually display much better performance of Firewire 400 over USB 2.0. There is a FAQ on USB that sums up the difference as follows: USB and 1394 are complimentary technologies. 1394 is for devices where high performance is a priority and price is not, while USB is for devices where price is a priority and high performance is not.

    12. Re:FireWire by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Informative
      Too bad the average sustained transfer rates for USB 2.0 are far lower than those of FireWire, despite the peak rate being higher.

      Lower, but not far lower (USB 2.0 ~ 34MB/sec, FW400 ~ 40MB/sec). As others have pointed out, the transfer rate on USB 2.0 is not the bottleneck in this type of device, it's usually the storage device.

      I always find the flip side of the equation funnier... When people buy external USB/Firewire hard drives, they select 7200rpm drives over 5400rpm drives. The bottleneck on those devices is the USB 2.0 or Firewire interface, so the (lower cost, cooler running, lower power consumption, quieter) 5400rpm drive is actually the better choice.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    13. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad the average sustained transfer rates for any small MP3 plaer hard drive are far lower than USB2.0 or Firewire. Why not use the more universal and ubiquietous solution?

      Notice the parent is talking about MP3 players, not high-speed (full size) external hard drives.

    14. Re:FireWire by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The bottleneck on those devices is the USB 2.0 or Firewire interface, so the (lower cost, cooler running, lower power consumption, quieter) 5400rpm drive is actually the better choice

      What about for random access of many small files? For that, the limiting factor is likely to be rotational latency of the drive, and 7200 RPM will be better than 5400 RPM.

    15. Re:FireWire by javatips · · Score: 1

      Just look at external harddrives specifications for model that support both USB2.0 and Firewire.

      In all cases (were they specify actual transfer rate instead), firewire rate are always higher than USB2.0.

      See this one for example.

    16. Re:FireWire by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      Too bad the average sustained transfer rates for USB 2.0 are far lower than those of FireWire, despite the peak rate being higher.

      Too bad that doesn't matter since your mp3 player isn't going to hit the bandwidth cap of either medium. Firewire is overkill for an mp3 player. It does not make sense.

      I'll take the USB2 device. It will interface with just about every PC you'll find these days, unlike firewire.

      Of course, if you want to be l33t, maybe you can get someone to design you an ipod with a fibre-channel interface.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    17. Re:FireWire by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      no where close to the same speed, Firewire even though slower in spec is alot more reliable and smoother than usb2, Also it uses alot less cpu and memory usage. All in all firewire is alot better than usb2...

    18. Re:FireWire by fr0dicus · · Score: 2, Informative

      FireWire is also a DMA method - USB2 isn't. This probably helps support the above.

    19. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      +5 interesting? Errr.....OK.

      You are a jackass. Just about every statement you just made was at least half-fallacy. Most major PC manufacturers and x86 motherboard OEMs include Firewire as well as USB 2.0 on-board nowadays.

    20. Re:FireWire by javatips · · Score: 1

      Weird both my laptop and desktop (purchased last year for the laptop (Dell) and 2 years ago for the desktop (HP)) have firewire and USB1.1, no USB 2.0.

    21. Re:FireWire by deinol · · Score: 1

      The real point it, USB is designed to be able to have lots of devices all talking at a moderate rate without interfering with each other. So sure, the cable and ports can handle a high rate, but any particular device never really sees it. Firewire is designed to allow for one device to get a big, fat, steady, pipe. There is a reason all of those digital camcorders use firewire. The good ones that is.

      I'm simplifying, but you get the point.

      --
      Got Apathy?
    22. Re:FireWire by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      What is the sustained write speed of one of those little harddrives?

      Given how crap speed I get from my new seagate w/ 8MB cache and 7200rpm, I'd imagine that the wire speed is the least of your worries.

    23. Re:FireWire by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      that is peak, not sustained....firewire 400 still beats USB 2.0, not to mention whjat firewire 800 will do.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    24. Re:FireWire by macemoneta · · Score: 1
      What about for random access of many small files?

      The rotational speed of a drive primarily impacts its sustained data transfer rate. For random access to small files, the cache size and algorithm (e.g., full track read-ahead), and head seek time are the primary controlling factors. In my experience, the 5400rpm drives are quite capable of keeping the slow interface saturated in either case.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    25. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Too bad the average sustained transfer rates for any small MP3 plaer hard drive are far lower than USB2.0 or Firewire. Why not use the more universal and ubiquietous solution?

      That would be Firewire, which has been in the market longer, and can be found in more devices, in spite of what the good people at Intel (the patent-holders of USB2) would have you believe.

      Also, Firewire scales up (currently to 800, theoretically to 1600), while USB2 does not.

    26. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fast was the writespeed on that ipod HD again..

      Yeah sure whatever.. Or as we usualy say.. In you dreams buddy.

    27. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firewire more universal and ubiquitous than USB? Considering every computer with Firewire (i.e. MACS) has a USB port....

      You forgot to wipe Steve Jobs's spoo off your chin before posting.

    28. Re:FireWire by iceperson · · Score: 1

      I did the same thing only with a 16Gig folder and USB clocked in at about 20% faster.

    29. Re:FireWire by iceperson · · Score: 1

      I bought a precision workstation less than a year ago and it doesn't have firewire. I just looked at the website and only the the Dimension XPS has firewire while the next model down has 8 usb 2.0 ports.

    30. Re:FireWire by bbtom · · Score: 1

      Surely 802.11b/g would be the best way: get within range, it syncs up with your computer automatically.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    31. Re:FireWire by mpost4 · · Score: 1

      Well That is a idea, but I would say bluetooth, yes slower (bad) but still it is a shorter range (good) and it can be setup to sync with devices that it is paired with (good)

      I have my bluetooth cell phone setup to sync the address book with my macs address book, when I get in range it will sync the address book, which is nice, when I get home I don't have to worry about syncing my cellphones address book, it does it for me. But with your idea it still work work the same way, I like your basic idea alot.

    32. Re:FireWire by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      I guess you could use SCSI vs. IDE as an analogy... sounds like some very similar tradeoffs.

    33. Re:FireWire by nomel · · Score: 1

      All I gotta say is one word...err...model number
      iHP-200

      USB 2.0, FM radi, optical in out, blah b lah blah...saw a couple reviews that put the experimentally found audio quality measurements higher than the ipod.

    34. Re:FireWire by nomel · · Score: 1

      oh yeah...and it has ogg, mp3, asf, wmv support. and, it has upgradable firmware so they can add any codec they want (this was already done with the older players to support ogg). and, it has a 20 gig hard drive and a nifty remote control with an lcd on it.

    35. Re:FireWire by Kris_J · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 is plenty fast enough, you're compairing FireWire to USB1.1.

    36. Re:FireWire by VickyNaylor · · Score: 1

      AC - "Most people are under 6 feet tall" javatips - "That's wierd because I'm 6 feet 2"

      --

      ---
      imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie...
    37. Re:FireWire by xtturbo · · Score: 0

      I disagree with you macemoneta. My WD Raptor 10,000 rpm hdd only just makes a sustained rate of 40mbytes a sec minimum. many 7200 will fail to achieve above 40mbytes a sec, or even 30, in all places of the disc.

    38. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always find the flip side of the equation funnier... When people buy external USB/Firewire hard drives, they select 7200rpm drives over 5400rpm drives. The bottleneck on those devices is the USB 2.0 or Firewire interface, so the (lower cost, cooler running, lower power consumption, quieter) 5400rpm drive is actually the better choice.

      Bzzzt, wrong. There are a ton of factors that go into the transfer rates. I mean hell, you've got several interfaces to pass through and they all add latency. There is a difference in performance between most 7200 and 5400 RPM hard-drives across Firewire.

      You never get the full bandwidth in any case. Neither from the hard-drive nor across the Firewire interface. You're lucky to get 25 MB/sec from a 7200 RPM drive and 15 MB/sec from a 5400 RPM drive. I have tested and verified this time and again with different drives and Firewire controllers.

    39. Re:FireWire by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      I've never seen USB 2.0 devices that could do sustained transfer rates of more than ~13 MB/sec. IEEE1394 using the Oxford 911 bridge maxes out at around 20 MB/sec.

      Compare that to IDE on a PATA/133 bus, which can do > 34 MB/sec. at the beginning of a drive, trailing off to ~25 MB/sec. or so at the end.

      Strangely enough, though, I HAVE noticed a declining transfer rate as you approach the end of the drive on the FireWire devices.

      Have you seen transfer rates that approach the peak bus rates (in the 34 MB/sec range for USB 2, or 40 MB/sec for FW)? If so, I'd love to get my hands on the bridges that you're using!

    40. Re:FireWire by macemoneta · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what chipsets Maxtor uses in their external USB 2.0/Firewire drives, but from my 100GB transfer timing measurements they are sustaining ~34MB/sec/~40MB/sec respectively.

      I'm not the only one that has seem this; check the benchmarks. I'm sure if you Google-around you can find more.

      Perhaps the limiting factor is the machine you're using? When I connected the same drive to an older laptop, the transfer rate dropped to about 1/3 the rated speed. The bottleneck may be elsewhere in your I/O path.

      In addition, all PC USB 2.0/Firewire interfaces are not equal, and my testing was performed with a 2.4.22-based Linux kernel. There are many variables that will impact performance, and isolating a constriction is not a trivial task.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  3. Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Rio Karma supports Ogg-Vorbis and FLAC files already, is 20gig, and can be had for less than $250. Where's the justification for buying a 1.5gig player? Apple is on crack and the Dell is just a rebadged Creative Labs Nomad Zen.

    BTW: IRiver also makes an Ogg-capable portable, several of them, but their 20gig model is about $399. :(

  4. OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I hear OGG, I immeidately think that it must be whack, but slashbots constantly say that won't buy something unless it supports OGG. Is it like 220V power or USB something? What is it? good or whack?

  5. The price matters by MooCows · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If this is cheap enough, I'll definitely buy it.
    The one thing still preventing me from buying a portable audio player is the price.
    I don't need 20GB of music in my pocket, 1,5GB is more than enough for me.

    --
    The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
    30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    1. Re:The price matters by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Check out http://www.pcwebshopper.com/mp3.html and http://store.yahoo.net/s168/mp3playernew.html for a small, cheap mp3 player. I have one and it works great. No display though.

    2. Re:The price matters by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

      This is true for a lot of people I'd guess. My playlist of "A" grade songs is less than 150 songs long out of 4 gigs of MP3's. Yeah I've ripped all of my pearl jam albums, but for a good mix i'll be damned if more than 5 or 6 out of 60-70 tracks will make it in. I've got all of the "System of a Down" (no, this is not's Bill Gate's band :) ) tracks, but only 3 go in there. Metallica? I put "battery" and maybe another 1 or 2 that I really like (those I download off Kazaa though). I'll be damned if I can put 1.5 gigs of song that are the same quality together. Only way you get to 20 gigs is if you drop ALL of your beatles, pearl jam songs in there without even choosing to listen only to the ones you really like.

      I've got a bunch of cd's that are burned, archived and removed from my HD's song because they were full albums of groups I don't even listen to and they diminish the quality of my mega-mix when you put all of your tracks on "Random".

    3. Re:The price matters by MooCows · · Score: 1

      1.5GB is an average of 22 of my (legally ripped to Ogg) albums.

      Plenty of music in such a small device.

      I wonder if it's got a HD or Flash memory by the way.

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    4. Re:The price matters by JonathanBoyd · · Score: 1

      The simple solution in iTunes is to rate all your songs then have a smart playlist that auto-updates with all your 4 star or 5 star songs and plays randomly. That way you have all your music, but can also have your 'mega-mix'. Not sure how well other jukebox software handles this.

    5. Re:The price matters by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

      mate, that's what i thought until i bought a 15G iPod. now i'm regretting not getting the 40G one!

    6. Re:The price matters by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I tend though to listen to an album from start to finish. This takes up more space. However, I have no problem switching the albums on the thing every couple of days.

      What I'm waiting for is something that has the feature set of the Rio Karma + and FM tuner. I really want FLAC so that I can store all my music in that format, and transfer it to my portable with out converting it first.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    7. Re:The price matters by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      I don't need 20GB of music in my pocket, 1,5GB is more than enough for me
      Come on! You know better than that surely. 1.5Gb sounds good if you naively think that you never need more than a few dozen albums at a time. But just you wait until over a period of a few weeks you want to listen to a much wider portion of your music collection and you have to keep juggling what is on that 1.5Gb. I ignored the existence of portable mp3 players until one appeared on which all of my music fitted. The increase in convenience when that step happens is incredible. You no longer have constant shuffling back and forth. It's great!

      Unless of course you only have 1.5Gb of music.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    8. Re:The price matters by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't need 20GB of music in my pocket, 1,5GB is more than enough for me

      Don't underestimate the convenience. 20 gig is enough for many people to rip and download all of their CDs. They don't have to plan ahead what they want to take with them.

      1.5 gig is 10-20 albums, depending on how you rip. I would not like to have to pick what 10 albums I'm going to take to work each day.

      Sometimes I listen to something like Pink Floyd or Neil Young, and then feel like more, and might end up listening to 5 albums in a row from that artist. Other times, after one album, I want something totally different next, like Garrison Keillor.

      It would be horrible to have to pick in the morning which 10 albums are going to fit in with my mood that day.

    9. Re:The price matters by Daath · · Score: 1

      I got an iPod, and I don't really need 20GB in my pocket either, but it's nice - we got a big pipe to the internet at work, so when I have to download a lot, I just put it on my iPod - You automatically have a 20GB harddrive with you - an usb-key-substitute if you will, and I love it ;)

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    10. Re:The price matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be horrible to have to pick in the morning which 10 albums are going to fit in with my mood that day."

      Yea, it sounds like you're life would fall apart. Horrible.

    11. Re:The price matters by MooCows · · Score: 1

      Of course, in my situation I can listen to music at work and when I'm home all the time. (working behind a PC is great in that aspect :p)

      1.5GB is enough for when I want to listen to music when I'm not at work or at home.

      --
      The path I walk alone is endlessly long.
      30 minutes by bike, 15 by bus.
    12. Re:The price matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet that -inch pecker in your pocket is also "more than enough" for you. I need 30-gigs of music for my 9-inch cock (different song for all the girls that suck it).

    13. Re:The price matters by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Winamp 5 does this pretty nicely. Look in the media library.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    14. Re:The price matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great. I have 500+ CDs (legally bought), and at least 100 worth of bootleg/live CDs.

    15. Re:The price matters by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I justified the extra cost with the fact that I can back up all my source code, bring pictures with me to people's houses, carry around a few seasons of the simpsons, and listen to music.

    16. Re:The price matters by otprof · · Score: 1
      The Rio Karma has a DJ function that lets you pick the most played songs in a given time frame, songs from a particular year, songs that you used to listen to a bunch but haven't lately (golden oldies), or even your least played songs.

      What I like about keeping all my music together on a big drive is that I'm constantly "re-discovering" tracks that I had mostly ignored when I was using my 160MB flash-based player.

      The iPod has a similar "smart playlist" feature, if I'm not mistaken. From my experience, the one on the Karma is really cool.

    17. Re:The price matters by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "Don't underestimate the convenience. 20 gig is enough for many people to rip and download all of their CDs"

      57.2 gig is enough to backup your hard-drive, and rip all of your CDs...

    18. Re:The price matters by raodin · · Score: 1

      How big is your harddrive? That wouldn't come even close to backing up my harddrive AND holding all my music.

    19. Re:The price matters by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      I would just generate playlists at random with some script. I find that if I am involved in choosing what music from my collection I listen to, then I miss things because of prejudices.

      --
      :wq
    20. Re:The price matters by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      I've never come across a built in FM tuner on a piece of portable kit that was any more than an afterthought. If you're serious about listening to radio on the move you really need something like a radio walkman. The Sony one that I have is so small you hardly know you are carrying it but the reception is excellent. Lesser portable radios will just piss you off in the long run.

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    21. Re:The price matters by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that

      A. I own any CDs

      B. I don't liek to update my music

      C. I listen to things by album or have all day to futz around with playlists.

      All of which are wrong. I burn a different CD of music for my car every two weeks. All of which is new music. If I had a nice 1.5 GB player with a wireless radio connection, It'd be perfect.

      Not everyone has a huge CD library to download, or even cares that much. Music is just something I listen to jogging or in the car. 2-3 hours of continuous non-repeating music is more than enough.

      Oh, and it needs an FM tuner. the iPod is sorrely lacking in this department for no good reason (how expensive can an FM tuner be? Like, 1 dollar???). Sometimes, you just want the morning news.

    22. Re:The price matters by Jonathan · · Score: 1

      Don't underestimate the convenience. 20 gig is enough for many people to rip and download all of their CDs. They don't have to plan ahead what they want to take with them.

      Heck, I'd expect that for typical people, 5 gigs would be more than enough to store their complete collection. It is for me, and I actually have more CDs (about 80) than most of my friends.

    23. Re:The price matters by JoeBorn · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the 1.5 GB 1" drives cost the manufacturers a lot more per GB than the physically larger drives (1.8" and 2.5"). A 1.5G 1" drive was running $65 last time I looked (they've probably dropped since), while a 20GB 2.5" can be had for $80 or less in quantity. The 20GB drives for the iPod (1.8") are somewhere slightly north of $100 (maybe $110) in quantity. It's really a question of how much you value smaller physical size v. capacity.

      --
      If you're going through hell, keep going -Winston Churchill
  6. Something for the wife. by Geccoman · · Score: 3, Informative

    It even LOOKS iPod-ish

    My wife would love the FM recording, too.

    --
    I'm on a chair.
    1. Re:Something for the wife. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could go on at length about what your wife does and does not like, but i choose not to. Thank you very much, enjoy the clams, I'll be here all week.

      Jerry Seinfeld

  7. Stickin' it to the Man by cb8100 · · Score: 1

    It's great to see a relatively unknown company come out with a (hopefully) great product that can compete with the big boys.

    I've had a couple generic MP3 players over the years, but nothing that could compete with an iPod.

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  8. Apple Music by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's also kinda funny that, on the web page, the device's display shows a couple of Beatles songs. (The Beatle's record label is Apple Corps)

    1. Re:Apple Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the beatles are associated with apple records, not apple computer

    2. Re:Apple Music by beady · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is a lot of friction between Apple, and Apple because of Apple joining the "music business", something which Apple didn't like because the felt people might confuse Apple and Apple!
      What kind of fool could do that?!

    3. Re:Apple Music by repetty · · Score: 1

      What's funny about that is that Apple Records has no damn interest in any technology more recent than the '70s and certainly has no interest in having any of their music on anyone's MP3 player.

    4. Re:Apple Music by slim · · Score: 1

      You're comparing Apples with... oh wait.

      Anyhow, when Apple Computer was named, Apple Music's lawyers agreed to let them use the name as long as they didn't enter the music business.

      This is why Apple's system beep replacement (when sound hardware became capable of more than a beep) is called "Sosumi".

      I don't know what the legal situation is now that iTMS exists.

    5. Re:Apple Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's even funnier is that in the 70's, Apple wanted nothing to do with music really, and Apple Records tried to sue Apple in the 80's because their machines made "music" in the form of system sounds.

      Now Apple, after agreeing not to be in the music biz, has made it their "No. 1 Priority". pff

    6. Re:Apple Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That works for me. I don't want any of their music on my mp3 player either.

    7. Re:Apple Music by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Funnier still because songs by the Beatles aren't sold on iTunes Music Store (in the US).

    8. Re:Apple Music by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      Apple Music is suing Apple Computer last time i heard (wasn't there a /. story on it a while back?). They say apple computer is violating the terms of the 'no music biz' agreement with the iPod store, etc. So the fact that Apple Music songs are shown on the iPod (along with an N Sync song! hahahahaha what a jab!) is a direct jab at Apple Music.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  9. Apple has a patent on 3-button mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    They consider those to be a derivative of their single button patent 3 times over.

  10. Amazingly bad copy by elliotj · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never fail to be amazed at how often companies try to copy Apple's design only to produce a product that looks similar but is noticably uglier.

    It's like on Charles in Charge where one of the sisters was noticeably hotter than the other one, and yet in one episode the ugly sister won a beauty contest just to show that there's more to a person than looks but that didn't change the fact that everybody still would rather jump the hotter sister.

    1. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

      OMG, that was probably one of the funniest, dated commentaries on mp3 players I've heard in a long time...

    2. Re:Amazingly bad copy by gregarican · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then the hotter sister (Nicole Eggert) moved on to "Baywatch." Moral of the story - keep an eye on hotter sister.

    3. Re:Amazingly bad copy by R@Bastard · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the life lessons in high-end design that can be learned from Charles in Charge...

      --
      Mucous membranes are the part of your brain that, like, make you think about mucous. --Beavis
    4. Re:Amazingly bad copy by slim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never fail to be amazed at how often companies try to copy Apple's design only to produce a product that looks similar but is noticably uglier.

      It's entirely subjective. WFIW I think this is marginally nicer looking than an original iPod.

    5. Re:Amazingly bad copy by tds67 · · Score: 1
      Then the hotter sister (Nicole Eggert) moved on to "Baywatch."

      Ugly people can't swim, so Nicole got the job.

      But why weren't there any fat lifeguards on Baywatch? Fat lifeguards would be much more efficient at floating, if you ask me.

    6. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thin lifeguard with large breast are as efficient as fat lifeguards.

    7. Re:Amazingly bad copy by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      This is sad, and all too true, which is one of the (many) reasons I'm very happy with my Rio Karma :) It's a totally different form factor to the iPod, and I find it a lot more comfortable to use and carry around.

      Course, the fact that it's a far superior piece of kit also helps ;)

      P

    8. Re:Amazingly bad copy by tds67 · · Score: 1
      Thin lifeguard with large breast are as efficient as fat lifeguards.

      Good point(s). My boo-boo!

    9. Re:Amazingly bad copy by tommck · · Score: 1

      Who wants to watch that slow-mo giggling when the giggling's being done by the cheeks, belly and chins???

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    10. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never fail to be amazed at the slashdot geekdom that would actually cite Charles in Charge as a reference for a corporate product design process comparison.

      There's a reason why you're not in the boardroom, bucko.

    11. Re:Amazingly bad copy by kraemer · · Score: 1

      FYI, the non-hot sister is REALLY hot now... Check it out

    12. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Corbie · · Score: 1

      Good God, man! Not only have you settled for the ugly sister, you're in DENIAL about it as well!

    13. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's entirely subjective. WFIW I think this is marginally nicer looking than an original iPod.

      the "it's subjective" argument is an egregious fallacy that has propogated like wildfire over the past 100 years or so. it falls in to the same category as "you're a winner just for participating".

      personal opinion is subjective, however just because someone personally declares that they like a crap design more than an elegant one does not all of a sudden change the fact that the crap design is crap.

      this isn't bad, but if one were to commit to a thorough critique it would fall woefully short in comparison to the ipod.

    14. Re:Amazingly bad copy by raodin · · Score: 1

      Better at floating, but worse endurance. Of course, I doubt most of the "lifeguards" in baywatch had much athletic ability either.

    15. Re:Amazingly bad copy by tpv · · Score: 1

      Because he can relate complex philosophical issues in terms that his audience can understand, wheras board members are required to ramble on incomprehensibly and then threaten to sue people?

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    16. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are you; Peter Griffin?!

    17. Re:Amazingly bad copy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was because you failed to use the word "bucko"

  11. so NOw the question is by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
    when are they going to have ACC on it

    ;-)

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    1. Re:so NOw the question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ACC won't fit on it. 9 (soon to be 12) colleges are simply too big.

    2. Re:so NOw the question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      nevermind the ACC, what about the Big East?

    3. Re:so NOw the question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the hell would you want that?

    4. Re:so NOw the question is by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be a Kreskin to see that the Big East is dying. Another crippling bombshell hit the beleagured athletic conference when Miami and VT...

      Sorry, couldn't resist. :-)

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  12. Scroll Wheel Prior Art by Adrenochrome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Any Roland/Akai/EMU rack-mount synth or sampler.

    1. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Not a Roland or EMU user, but my Akai's wheel is quite a bit different from the iPod wheel.

    2. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by hrieke · · Score: 1

      Band and Olufsen phones have the scroll wheel for a while too.
      http://www.bang-olufsen.com/sw1623.asp

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    3. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by tbase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the BeoComm 1 cordless phones have a nice one. it's really a great feature, I hope it doesn't get squashed by some stupid patent.

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    4. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your .sig is stupid. Romans had no concept of decimal numbers.

    5. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by slim · · Score: 1

      My 7 year old Sharp minidisc player has one...

      Sorry, best image I could find...

      It is used to navigate menus and select tracks, just like the iPod one, too.

    6. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

      Is it a touch-pad scroll wheel? Didn't think so. Not prior art. RTFPatent Application.

    7. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by bobbagum · · Score: 1

      also the B&O beocom 6000 phones

    8. Re:Scroll Wheel Prior Art by Greedo · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure, but I think Apple's patent is on the "scroll-less" scroll wheel.

      Sure, your synth -- along with many other devices -- had a scroll wheel to facilitate input. Apple's wheel, however, doesn't spin and uses electroresistance or whatever it's called to get data. Kinda like a laptop trackpad.

      I don't think there is any prior art like that.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  13. Apple patented the wheel? by gst · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ha! Apple should be happy if they aren't sued because of patent infringement. The australians patented the wheel before them.

    1. Re:Apple patented the wheel? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      Excuse my ignorance, but what's so patentable about arranging buttons in a circle, and why is this called a wheel?

    2. Re:Apple patented the wheel? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The jog wheel on the iPod is not just buttons in a circle - it's a non-moving touch dial you move your thumb around the center of to move the cursor.

  14. Just to be annoying... by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How hard would it be to have, instead of a wheel, a thin strip of the stuff they use for touchpads in laptops (god, how I hate them, give me a trackball anytime) on the side to replace the functionality of said wheel?

    I don't think it'd be TOO hard, and the results would probably be good.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    1. Re:Just to be annoying... by mog · · Score: 1

      That's what the 3G iPods have. I love mine.

    2. Re:Just to be annoying... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      2Gs had them too.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    3. Re:Just to be annoying... by jimbolaya · · Score: 1

      That's basically what the 2G and 3G iPods have, but instead of a strip, it's a circle. What's the difference? Well, when scrolling through a long list, you can move your finger in a continuous, fluid motion around a circle. Compare that to the stroke-and-lift, stroke-and-lift motion you'd need with a linear strip.

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

  15. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    You forgot to call them "Apple iPod clones," because hey, Apple was the first company ever to come up with a portable MP3 player.

  16. Look at that dude's hand! by mr_luc · · Score: 2, Funny

    http://www.nextway.co.kr/images/products/temp.jpg

    On the DCude site. It looks like their hand model must be having a heart attack off-camera; if the picture gets slashdotted, just imagine a hand with fingers contorted into a clawed husk, with the nice little dCube in the center of the hand.

    Looks very freaky.

    1. Re:Look at that dude's hand! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look's like a photoshop job to me.

    2. Re:Look at that dude's hand! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      A very bad Photoshop job, unless Andre the Giant was the model. If the comparative scale were correct, the buttons would be unusuable.

  17. iRiver iHP 120 (100, 140) by RCwyvern · · Score: 1

    IMHO, these are the real iPod killers out there. Very similar in size and shape, sleek design, cheaper (at third-party retail sites) for the same capacity model, and with twice the battery life, better PC support (windows and linux), FM tuner, recording equipment, and OGG support for those who care. No dock, though. ;-)

    --
    I am *not* an Atomic Playboy, but I *am* a cheese-eating surrender-monkey!
    1. Re:iRiver iHP 120 (100, 140) by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more... in fact I'm encoding the rest of my CD's to OGG and MP3(VBR) as we speak because my IHP-140 is supposed to arrive on Monday.

      The other nice thing about the iRiver's is they come with some of the basic equipment, carrying case, microphone and such.

      I read something incredibly interesting just last night that made me wonder about iPOD's, is it true that they only support CBR MP3's and AAC's?

    2. Re:iRiver iHP 120 (100, 140) by _Swank · · Score: 1

      I read something incredibly interesting just last night that made me wonder about iPOD's, is it true that they only support CBR MP3's and AAC's

      'incredibly interesting' and wrong. the ipod supports: AAC (16 to 320 Kbps), MP3 (32 to 320 Kbps), MP3 VBR, Audible, AIFF (Mac only) and WAV

      see iPod specs
    3. Re:iRiver iHP 120 (100, 140) by pinny20 · · Score: 1

      is it true that they only support CBR MP3's and AAC's?

      No, iPods support both CBR and VBR MP3s, AACs (which sounds as good as Ogg Vorbis imho), WAVs and AIFFs.

    4. Re:iRiver iHP 120 (100, 140) by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      Sounded too bad to be true, while the iPOD's not for me, I didn't think apple was stupid.

  18. Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product page by rcastro0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Easier if you can't read Korean:
    Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product page

    However don't set your expectations too high, it seems they still need to work a bit on their Korean translation engine:
    The NHD-150D supports a next generation digital sound cause OGG VORBIS file format (ogg) . The MP3 the sound quality and the enemy who jump over a file 500Kbps until it will be able to remake the ogg file which is proud a dosage from the NHD-150D. (sic)
    --
    Quem a paca cara compra, paca cara pagará.
  19. 1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I realize they're pricey, but stop running and accept that you'll eventually pay extra to get an iPod. Stop running to the ends of the earth for every "iPod-killer" to come down the block. The amount of money you'll spend on each new pale substitute will be so much more than you'd spend on the iPod, which works so well with iTunes. This is an intervention, my friend.

    1. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Kenja · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please expalin in one sentance why I would ever pay more for an MP3/OGG/ACC/WMA player just because it has an Apple logo on it? That seems to be the only real reason to get an iPod VS many of the iPod "killers" (some of which predate the iPod).

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you got a job?

    3. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Matey-O · · Score: 1
      Please expalin in one sentance why I would ever pay more for an MP3/OGG/ACC/WMA player just because it has an Apple logo on it?
      One hand access to 2500 songs that just works. Two sentences? Access to all of that with _7_ controls. This thing is SO simple it makes everything else I've played with look like they're wearing clown shoes.
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    4. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "Because you got a job?"

      Thats the best you can do? Lets see, keep wad of cash pluss a good MP3 player or get an Apple logo with a good MP3 player. Which to chose. I think I'll take the cash.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You shouldn't pay more just because it has an Apple logo. You should pay more because:

      The iPod works with the music store that currently makes about 70% of on-line music sales, works on both major desktop OS platforms, plays the major audio formats (AAC, MP3, WAV and AIFF with others possible) for high quality compressed and uncompressed audio, operates as a portable hard drive (bootable for Macs), replaces most of the fuctions of your PDA(calendar, notes, alarm clock, contacts, games) and generally does the best job at melding all the requirements of a portable player; mainly small size, long battery life, easily readable display, fast file transfers, high quality audio amplifier, easy navigation, and the elusive cool/wow factor.

      It's long, but gramatically I do thing that qualifies as one sentence.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I have an iPod and love it, and I understand that there is no iPod killer right now. That said, it's still interesting to look for two reasons. First, to see if the other companies can "get it". The iPod is not just a big hard drive, it's a fantastic UI. Second is to see what other people are comming up with. If another company has an inferior product but has some interesting or fantastic features, that could show us what's comming. If someone made something that had some of these features and came close to the iPod (was almost as good) then Apple might be forced to improve the iPod, and looking at the competitor would show us what might be added.

      Just because I love my car doesn't stop me from looking into other one every once in a while when some interesting feature comes along. Lets you see what's comming.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    7. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Steve Jobs thinks (his weblog)

    8. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by radish · · Score: 1

      No, I won't. I have no interest in paying 30% more for a product which doesn't have several features I consider useful or even essential. IF I was a mac user, and IF I was an iTunes user, then an iPod makes sense. But I'm not, and I'm not, so it's compatibility with those products is entirely irrelevant.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for the iPod to support OGG. If something else comes along before then I might pick it up instead.

    10. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by filmsmith · · Score: 1

      Are you counting the 'hold' switch? Becuase otherwise I count six controls: Scroll Wheel, Enter, Previous, Menu, Pause/Play, Next.

      fs

    11. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Matey-O · · Score: 1

      yup. technically, it's the 'feature' that makes everything else play nicely...and can't be left out.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    12. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Spoing · · Score: 1

      Sure...which iPod supports OGG and a lossless codex like FLAC? If you have an answer, I'll consider it, otherwise I'm not interested!

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    13. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with several of your points... disagree with a couple... and take definite exception to "long battery life", since when is six to eight hours long for a portable music device?

      That's not even a full workday, it's barely the two hour wait, two hour flight, one hour drive to the hotel.

      Plus you put that in the "generally does the best job" category, iPOD's battery life is trumped by several players.

    14. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about those of us that live outside the US, and have no iTunes service that we can use ?

    15. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that the iPod had the longest battery life, or that there weren't any players that trumped it in any particular catigory. I just said that the iPod does the best job of compromising between all of those demands of a personal player.

      As for your theoretical flight:
      Two hour wait: every airport I've been to has publically available power outlets around the terminals. It's trivial to locate and use these to charge/power a laptop, cell phone or iPod. You should even be able to get multiple plug modules for the iPod charger brick so it will work around the world.

      Four hour flight: Unless you run the backlight, play games and continually select non-buffered songs to play the iPod should easily last 4 hours from the full charge you got sitting in the terminal. Some airlines are now even offering 12vDC car lighter type adapters to power your electronics in-flight.

      Hour drive: The iPod should still have over 1/2 it's power left for this drive, even if your drive takes 3 hours you'll still be listening as you walk in to your hotel room where you can plug-in an recharge to 80% capacity in an hour.

      I've also found Apple's battery estimates to be a little conservative with my 1st gen iPod, I regularly got at least 11 hours from it. After 2 years I still get 8 hours from the battery.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    16. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will take your lean definition of "wad of cash" to mean you don't have a job.

    17. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by duncanIdaho.clone() · · Score: 1

      > works on both major desktop OS platforms

      Ture, but it's worth pointing out that you have to pick one or the other =(

      --

      feints within feints, wheels within wheels

    18. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      Long battery life? What is it, 16 months before you need to pay 200 dollars for apple to replace the battery?

    19. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod works with the music store that currently makes about 70% of on-line music sales

      I don't live in a country where the store is available.

      works on both major desktop OS platforms

      So do other players, in addition they also work on non-major platforms.

      plays the major audio formats (AAC, MP3, WAV and AIFF with others possible)

      And again, so do other players. With more formats already instead of "possible".

      for high quality

      iPod quality of sound leaves lot to be desired, compared to others.

      operates as a portable hard drive (bootable for Macs)

      As do plenty of competitors. Dunno about bootable, but then again, couldn't care less about Macs.

      replaces most of the fuctions of your PDA(calendar, notes, alarm clock, contacts, games)

      My phone already does that.

      and generally does the best job at melding all the requirements of a portable player; mainly small size, long battery life, easily readable display, fast file transfers, high quality audio amplifier, easy navigation, and the elusive cool/wow factor.

      These are not proven and if they were, they'd probably be just as false as the ones above.

    20. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. 've had my iPod 5GB first generation for about 2 years and it sill gets about 8 hours of run time on a charge. down from about 11 at the start

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    21. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Not really.
      The iTunes files themselves work on both platforms, whether you rip tracks yourself or purchase them from the iTMS.
      If you plug the thing in to a Mac, then in to a PC (or a different Mac or two PCs) iTunes will only offer to erase the iPod and copy the new songs to it. If iTunes also re-formats the iPod HD, then I guess no-one would notice (unless it doesn't preserve notes, contacts and alarms)

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    22. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by bishiraver · · Score: 1

      You must be one of the lucky ones, then. Horror stories abound about the battery dying..

    23. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      I've only read a few stories about premature battery death, the Neistats being the most prominent of the bunch.
      I'm not saying it's not possible for the battery to be dead in 18 months. If you go with the estimate of 500 recharge cycles for a lithium based battery, then if you recharged the battery about 28 times per month, 18 months would be the average lifespan.

      I've done the math on this in another post a few weeks ago. Whether the iPod uses proprietary internal battery packs, or user replaceable AA rechargables, you'd pay about $50 after 18 months for batteries either way. Alakaline's come in at over $500, or the price of a new iPod and then some. And these calculations are based on about 20 cycles per month, not the 28 the brothers seem to have averaged.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    24. Re:1.5 gig? FM radio? USB 2.0? OGG!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's still rubbish compared to the iRiver iHP series, which has estimated approx 16 hour battery life (assuming mp3 128k, around 13 hours for ogg Q4.25), has digital in/out, FM radio, mp3/ogg/wav playback support.

  20. Now this is what I call a REAL POWER OGG player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OGG PLAYER

    With this you can play the Russian National Anthem AND run Linux!

    This lappy is a bitch in flight tho.

  21. That isn't a scroll wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That isn't a scroll wheel it is a bunch of buttons in the shape of a circle with a button in the middle.

  22. Patent a scroll wheel? by Gilesx · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm missing the point here, but my Creative Nomad Jukebox 3 has a scroll wheel on it which I can use to scroll to songs, and generally navigate the interface, and I'm pretty sure this predates the iPod...

    --
    Sunday you're Thinking Different, Monday you're a huge tool, paying too much and waiting to think like everyone else.
    1. Re:Patent a scroll wheel? by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      JB3 doesn't predate iPod which was release 2000/2001. i've got the JB3 as well, i'm not real crazy about its scrolling and latency. 'course i'm quite a few firmware releases old (1.20.06), and i know they've addressed some scrolling issues.

      but when it comes down to it - it's on shuffle and the only time i touch it is to crank up the volume or skip that lame song that i keep forgetting to delete.

      then again, for some people a car is more than just something that takes you from A to B.

    2. Re:Patent a scroll wheel? by _Swank · · Score: 1

      i'm a little confused. i went to creative's site, looked at the jukebox 3 and the zen mp3 players and i am utterly at a loss as to where any of the creative players have a scroll wheel along the lines of the iPod's peizo-electric scroll wheel. there certainly wasn't prior art on this type of 'wheel' in the mp3 player market when apple came out with it and it's this same p-e scroll wheel that the Dcube has copied and that apple (presumably) has patented. it's not any old wheel that turns.

    3. Re:Patent a scroll wheel? by saden1 · · Score: 1

      My OLD VCR has a scroll wheel! So does OLD my stereo.

      --

      -----
      One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
    4. Re:Patent a scroll wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither of which are designed to navigate menu systems and lists of music. Your jog wheel and volume knob are for completely different purposes. Or should we patent the wheel and say anything else round is the same?

      (Posted as AC because WinIE sucks a nut)

  23. Price by natas823 · · Score: 1

    i didnt see anything about the price....are these gonna be in the hundred dollar range that people thought the new ipods would be in?

    --
    NaTe
  24. Not to be confused with... by cb8100 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't confuse this Dcube with NEC's D-Cube .

    --
    My lack of God, it's Trotsky!
  25. Dcube vs iPod by tarzan353 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As regards portable music playback devices, don't compare apples and ogg ranges.

    1. Re:Dcube vs iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hereby beat you with a stick.

      grooooooannn....

    2. Re:Dcube vs iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I at least have the decency to post things like that as an AC. You just did it right out in the open where children might see.

      If my kids start telling puns I'm holding you responsible Mister "Tarzan353" - if that is your real name!

    3. Re:Dcube vs iPod by mmortal03 · · Score: 1

      I'll give you props on that one. Posts that are funny usually don't ACTUALLY make me laugh out loud.

  26. More than a clone, I think. by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

    I imagine that Apple will consider that device a knock-off of the iPod and file suit. If the device stays in Korea, then perhaps there won't be a problem, but I can't picture Apple letting that thing show up on store shelves in the USA without a fight.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:More than a clone, I think. by Sarojin · · Score: 1

      Not very likely - take a look at, say, the e.Digital Odyssey, which has been selling with no problems.
      Odyssey

      --
      HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
    2. Re:More than a clone, I think. by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

      That unit doesn't use a scroll wheel, though. It has buttons in a circular design, a feature that the reviewer you mention didn't seem to like very much.

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  27. Where can I get one before Apple crushes them? by pashdown · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where can I get one before Apple crushes them?

  28. Now this is a man's OGG player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OGG PLAYER

    With this you can play the Russian National Anthem AND run Linux!

    This lappy is a bitch in flight tho.

  29. OOG? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Anything invented by OOG the OpenSouce Caveman is allright by me!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:OOG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      iPod no got OOG, so OOG no good. Me go ask Apple what good.

      Me get free karma now?

    2. Re:OOG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yaaaay! Free karma!

      Ooop! Post as AC. No get no karma. Sad now.

  30. Re:OGG? What is that about? by HeX314 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ogg is simply a better codec than MP3. The codec simply makes music sound better when played back. In MP3, you get audio artifacts (usually higher frequencies). Ogg/Vorbis attempts to minimize this, and the result is simply a better codec. The downside to Ogg is that it takes a fairly hefty processor for a mobile player to reproduce the sound. Thus, the player costs more because you're using a faster/more complex processor. For audiophiles, Ogg is a very good thing. For budget listeners, MP3 is a compromise.

  31. "Scroll wheel" by gumpish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sorry, but a scroll wheel is what sits between my left and right mouse buttons. Pick another name OKTHXBYE

    1. Re:"Scroll wheel" by D4MO · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look like a scroll wheel. Looks like the buttons are arranged in a circle.

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  32. previous art on b&o phone by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    And actually, the jog dial was on the beocom 6000 cordless phone. It's used for the same functions -- to select a name from a big list and to navigate menus -- so I don't see how using it on an mp3 player would be different than using it on a phone.

    1. Re:previous art on b&o phone by dredd1 · · Score: 1

      The beocom 6000 can even control some functions (such as volume) on B&O audio and video systems.

    2. Re:previous art on b&o phone by tbase · · Score: 1

      I've used the one one the beocom 1, and on the iPod. The only difference I see is that the beocom 1 is actually a moving part, where the iPod (the one I used anyhow) was more of a touchpad - which to me makes it more of a scroll circle than a wheel. Don't most wheels turn? :-)

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    3. Re:previous art on b&o phone by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      The first generation of iPods had a wheel that turned. The decided to eliminate the moving parts in the later versions. It probably had something to do with how annoying it is when pocket lint gets stuck in the wheel when you stick you 1000 songs in your pocket and can't scroll smoothly anymore.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:previous art on b&o phone by tbase · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I thought, but I never had my hands on a 1st gen, so I wasn't sure. I really dug the new one, and the moving one on the Beocom 1 is groovy- it's a bit big to fit in your pocket so that's probably not an issue with the phone :-)

      --

      666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
  33. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If I had to summarize, I'd say:

    WHACK

  34. Where can I get one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why more manufacturers don't put an FM radio in their players (some do). It doesn't cost much more (probably a couple of bucks at this point) and it's quite handy.

    Since this one supports OGG, MP3 and has an FM radio I'd certainly consider buying one if the price is right.

    Where can I buy one?

  35. FM Support by eples · · Score: 1

    FINALLY - an MP3 player with a digital FM tuner. Is this the only one? It's the only one I've seen.

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:FM Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iRiver supports a built in FM tuner as well.

    2. Re:FM Support by GizmoToy · · Score: 1

      Nope. I have a 3 year old Nomad II MG that had an FM tuner on it. In fact, I'm pretty sure the whole Nomad line has tuners. I'm sure many other players do, as well.

    3. Re:FM Support by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, there is the Neuros which is 20GB, supports Ogg and MP3 and has an FM tuner. It can even record. The best thing about it is the price at only $199, it is hard to beat.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    4. Re:FM Support by chendo · · Score: 1

      Uh... I'm sure lots of mp3 players have digital FM tuners... iRiver players do, and my MSI Megastick 256 does too, and it can record straight from FM.

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    5. Re:FM Support by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
      My brother has an old Creative Nomad II that has an FM tuner. This is by no means a new feature, I guess it's just not popular enough to be included on other players.

      Now the built in FM transmitter (which this seems to have) IS new, as far as I know. If they do a good job with that feature, that would be quite nice.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:FM Support by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? Even my $100 flash based Memorex player has a digital FM tuner, and it's far from the only one I've seen. Have you been looking hard enough?

    7. Re:FM Support by tsmccaff · · Score: 2, Informative

      I own a Neuros and I love it. Its a little bulky and not that sleek, but it gets the job done for half the price of comparable players. And its "backpack" design makes it easy to upgrade in the future.

      --
      "the starry sky above and the moral law within"-Kant
    8. Re:FM Support by raodin · · Score: 1

      I've been seriously considering a Neuros, mostly because of price. Is it really that bulky? I think I'm willing to risk it at the price, with the feature set it has, though.

  36. History repeats... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My prediction is that this will happen.

    1. Re:History repeats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know the price of this product ?

  37. _s by mbbac · · Score: 1

    You've got to love those underscores in the song titles! :)

    They're seriously apeing the iPod's look quite a bit with this one, though -- down to the white earbuds.

    --

    mbbac

  38. INTERESTING?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this interesting? Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't USB2 (a bit) faster?

    *scratches head*

    1. Re:INTERESTING?? by sniggly · · Score: 1

      old firewire ( 400Mbps) is usually faster than USB2 ( 480Mbps) becaus usb2 is often botched up with cheap components. firewire is more reliable.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  39. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and can be had for less than $250

    WHERE?!

  40. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *sigh*

  41. Re:OGG? What is that about? by gunnmjk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    OOoo Ogg is open source! It's free! It sounds so much better! Screw that nobody uses it, get off your high horse and download some MP3's.

  42. WTF? by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Funny
    If this is cheap enough, I'll definitely buy it. The one thing still preventing me from buying a portable audio player is the price... I don't need 20GB of music in my pocket, 1,5GB is more than enough for me.

    NO! Nonononono. Dude. Come on.

    This is Slashdot. "I don't need 20 GB of music".. of course you don't need it. But you will demand it. As a... nerd, or something.

    Now suck it up, and demand a 1 ounce 50GB overmediaplayer with a folding plasma screen and support for Ogg Stupidname. For $50. It is your goddammed right!

    :)

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  43. Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by theLOUDroom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IMO, the US patent system has basically desceneded into little more than a registry service. By submitting a patent you're declaring, "I had this idea on this date." There doesn't really seem to be all that much checking going on to see if the idea is actually patentable in the first place.

    I see things like this "scroll wheel" patent as an example of the ridiculous things that get rubber stamped at the patent office. It's not as if Apple invented the scroll wheel/jog dial. They've been avaible on VCR's, DAT's, etc for quite a long time. That leaves two things their patent could cover:
    1) Using a scroll wheel with *gasp* mp3s.
    2) The specfic details of how their scroll wheel interface works.

    (1) would be a junk patent. (2) would either be so broad it was a junk patent, or so specfic as to be worthless.

    --
    Life is too short to proofread.
    1. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      IMO, the US patent system...[troll, troll, troll]...

      Ever seen an iPod? Ever touched one, or watched someone use one?

      It's not a scroll wheel. No parts on it move. It's a touch-pad, built in a circular form, and touching it acts to scroll it. That's what's patented, not a freakin' scroll wheel. That's also what DCube's copied. I mean, geez, folks, you think Apple really patented a scroll wheel? They've had scroll wheels on things as far back as printing presses in the 1800s. Next, you'll try to tell me that there's prior art for Firewire 'cause fire's been around for hundreds of years.

      /rant

      -T

    2. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ever seen an iPod? Ever touched one, or watched someone use one?

      Ever see the ORIGINAL ipods? Maybe you aren't as familiar with the item being discussed as you think.

      It's a touch-pad, built in a circular form, and touching it acts to scroll it. That's what's patented, not a freakin' scroll wheel.

      Do you have a reference for this? You don't seem to be aware of the different ipod models, so I'm not going to just assume you have all the relevant patents memorized.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    3. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having gone through the patent process just last week (at least the qualifying rounds), Apple does qualify - their use of it was novel.

      Jog wheels and volume knobs are not designed to navigate user interfaces, menus, and such. Volume knobs are an analog control directly affecting the sound level, and jog wheels are for scanning back and forth in video. Neither navigates a menu interface or anything remotely close. That is what is novel - how the wheel is used, not its existance.

      (Posted as AC because WinIE sucks a nut)

    4. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Frogg · · Score: 1

      Sony have been making gadgets featuring their 'jog wheel' for a while now -- before Apple's iPods came out, I'm sure.

      Having not used either Apple nor Sony's wheels, I don't know how they really compare -- are they the same thing? (they seem it to me)

    5. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone referenced in another thread, there were menu driving scroll wheels back in the mid 90s for music synths.

      Also, the patent is not for a simply novel idea. It must be beyond obvious and a natural extension of existing technology. I'd wonder how much vid equipment these days use jog dials for menu driving uses.

      And please, does it not strike you as absurd your statement "how the wheel is used, not its existance". Jeesh. That's like "I put a wheel on a bike. This usage is patented! Oo, and a motorcyle, unicycle...patent, patent. $$$!!" And do you honestly believe this patent should lockup the industry for 40 some years? That ain't progress.

    6. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Milo77 · · Score: 1

      i hate patents as much as the next guy, but i do believe the interface on my ipod (touchpad/no moving parts) is patentable. i say this not knowing (or caring for that matter) which parts are actually patented. there are two things i think are innovative. first, the touch wheel - its great. like you said earlier models had a wheel. second, the software that works with the wheel - its great because it doesn't just track position/movement, but acceleration as well. maybe its obvious that that is the way it should work, but frankly it surprised me when i realized how it worked. i started scrolling through the list of several thousand songs i'd just copied to it and started getting mad because it was starting to look like it was going to take all day to get to the bottom of the list (which is where the song i was looking for was). i was ready to take it back to the store. in frustration i started moving my finger faster and faster and then i noticed i was at the bottom of the list. needless to say i was delighted. so, i don't know if a scroll wheel is patentable or if acceleration tracking is patentable, but the combination of them should be (imo). also, remember the old adage "all ideas are obvious once seen." indeed, after i realized how the ipod worked i thought to myself "of course that's how it should work" - in fact i might have come up with that same design/implementation myself (after some r&d), but as they say "necessity is the mother of invention"...one final thought. when did apple patent the wheel? i know that there have been quite a few players (even pdas) on the market for a long time. if the ipods design is so obvious, then why didn't anyone else patent it first. because it is *so* obvious? then why didn't someone release a player or pda that made use of it? if apple hadn't patented it what would the timeline look like? i suggest it looks like 1) everyone is competing with a bunch of different mp3 player designs (the market is searching for an innovative solution) 2) apple release the ipod with an unpatented intface, 3) it starts becoming the most popular player (as it has today, even being more expensive and very proprietary) 4) all/most new players clone the ipods interface (as they're trying to do today) 5) apple looks back and thinks "damn we should have patented the interface". like i said, i hate patents (usually software/algorithm ones), but i am not sure about this one...

    7. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      Most people here are mistaken. Apple never patented the scroll wheels found on the iPod or this D-cube. (however the D-cube looks like so much of a knockoff that it may be infringing Apple's design patent.) Apple did apply for a patent on a mouse having something similar to the combination scroll wheel/D-pad which made its way to the iPod Mini, however this patent has not been granted.

      See all Apple patents here.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

    8. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by skzbass · · Score: 0

      although the touch pad type wheel is new. IT really boils down to a round touch pad. Can the patent be contested on this point? i hope. But if ther were a player that used a pad even a square one it might be nicer. you coud use this for all functions.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    9. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by graikor · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's not accurate.

      Putting aside for the moment the fallacy that this thread is based on (Apple doesn't have a patent on the scroll wheel/jog dial, neither the moving parts kind or the solid-state), many Sony products, including their early CDMA telephones, used a scroll wheel/jog dial to navigate through menus, in a fashion very similar to the iPod, circa 1998.

      I love my iPod, and the interface is great, but that part of it is definitely not innovative.

    10. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      "Ever seen an iPod? Ever touched one, or watched someone use one?"

      Ever see the ORIGINAL ipods? Maybe you aren't as familiar with the item being discussed as you think.

      Um, yes. In fact, I had one. Then I got a 3rd gen one. So I've had both. Which have you had?

      Right, none.

      You can sit down now. Maybe you'll learn something.

      "It's a touch-pad, built in a circular form, and touching it acts to scroll it. That's what's patented, not a freakin' scroll wheel."

      Do you have a reference for this? You don't seem to be aware of the different ipod models, so I'm not going to just assume you have all the relevant patents memorized.

      Um, yes. I have a freaking reference for this. It took me 10 seconds on Google. Are you really that lazy?

      -T

    11. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      IT really boils down to a round touch pad. Can the patent be contested on this point? i hope. But if ther were a player that used a pad even a square one it might be nicer. you coud use this for all functions.

      Well, the difference (and nice part) about the circular scroll wheel is that you never hit an edge when scrolling. You can continuously scroll in a circle and never have to stop (until the end of your list, of course).
      As some have pointed out, you could do this in software with a square touchpad - sorta like mouse-gestures - but that would be less intuitive. Knowing to scroll circularly on a square pad is tough to know immediately, while on a circular pad, it's obvious (especially with the button in the middle - you have to scroll in a circle).

      -T

    12. Re:Scroll wheel == B.S. patent anyways by skzbass · · Score: 0

      all they would have to do it paint a circle on it or put a ridge in it.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  44. AM Support? by riotstarter · · Score: 1

    I wish a player had AM support, I never listen to FM and in my area AM has all the good sports radio and talk radio shows.

    1. Re:AM Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget highly conservative talk radio! :-P

      (I'd put an oblig. simpsons quote in, but...)

    2. Re:AM Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off /. NOW!!

    3. Re:AM Support? by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      Great point. Every year older I get...I find myself listening to more and more AM radio talk and sports shows in the car.

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    4. Re:AM Support? by danknight · · Score: 1

      Scary Aint it ?! Me too. Used to joke about AM being A$$&*^# Modulation Sutible only for the VERY old, you know like 35 and older! (shudder as I realize the 35th B-Day is coming round the corner like a frieght train !)

      --
      wanted: one clever sig,apply within
    5. Re:AM Support? by cens0r · · Score: 1

      This is something I would also like, but as I understand it is very hard to implement. The AM reciever is apparantly much more apt to pick up the electronic noise. Most large cities I've lived in replay their sports talk radio on at least one FM station. NPR is usually on both. So just an FM tuner would suit me fine. So I need an player that supports FLAC and FM. when is someone going to make one?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  45. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by wozster · · Score: 2, Informative

    A good FYI and discussion can be found Here

  46. Re:OGG? What is that about? by ooby · · Score: 1

    "It's Ogg. It's Ogg. It's big. It's heavy. It's wood."
    Isn't that an old Ren and Stimpy song?

    No, wait. That was _log_.

  47. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 1
    Rio Karma supports Ogg-Vorbis and FLAC files already, is 20gig, and can be had for less than $250. Where's the justification for buying a 1.5gig player?

    Because it's an iPod.

    The reasons that I can just say that, and lots of people know what I mean, is the answer to your question.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  48. Re:"Ogg Vorbis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus, calm down! You're fiestier than Howard Dean on speed!

    Just read the FAQ and all will be made clear to you.

    AC.

  49. If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by turkeyphant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought a second generation 20GB iPod soon after they came out. However, I now have more music than I can fit on it and I'm getting interested in re-ripping my tracks at higher quality or even investigating FLAC. Also, Apple is doing me a disservice by preventing me from using Ogg-Vorbis which I still think is superior to LAME's output. If I download .oggs, I then have to go through decompression and another round of lossy compression to create mp3s that will play on my iPod.

    As such, I'm very interested in the latest releases of hard-drive based mp3 players. I especially like the look of the iRiver players and I'm hoping to try out my friend's new Rio Karma. Nevertheless, I will have to save up again if I want to get a new player and there are a few minimum feature requirements I can't help thinking would be easy to include on a new player.

    • Native Ogg-Vorbis and FLAC support
    • Regular firmware updates that include customer suggestions
    • Optional remote (preferably with its own display
    • Ability to input audio via line-in and/or microphone. On-the-fly encoding not required
    • FM radio tuner
    • Semi-decent interface with well-organised playlisting and options. So many cheap flash-based players coming out of Asia these days have terrible interfaces. Also, an iPod-style scroll wheel or similar input device is necessary for scrolling through thousands of songs
    • Ability to sort folders/playlists by date, album, last modified, year and artist et cetera (i.e. dynamic rearranging of playlists, song lists according to ID3 tab information)
    • Access to other parts of tag information including year and lyrics
    • On-the-fly playlisting
    • Gapless playback
    • USB 2.0 or Firewire connectivity. Additional ethernet highly desirable
    • Can be mounted as external hard drive
    • 15+ hour replaceable battery essential

    I don't give a shit for ITMS compatibility or crappy organiser-style features or games. I just want to be able to fit all my songs in my pocket and find the right tunes to play when on the train. Is it really too much to ask?

    1. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Matey-O · · Score: 1
      I don't give a shit for ITMS compatibility or crappy organiser-style features or games. I just want to be able to fit all my songs in my pocket and find the right tunes to play when on the train. Is it really too much to ask?
      Not at all....'cause you left out the PRICE! I can build ya one of those for, oh, $2700 easy! (you also didn't mention formfactor)
      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    2. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by big_gibbon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I can VERY strongly recommend the Rio Karma to you. Point by point . . .

      * Native Ogg-Vorbis and FLAC support
      Check

      * Regular firmware updates that include customer suggestions
      Check, double. The community surrounding the Karma is incredible, and the developers are amazingly responsive :)

      * Optional remote (preferably with its own display
      Not at the moment. The campaign goes on :)

      * Ability to input audio via line-in and/or microphone. On-the-fly encoding not required
      No, and very unlikely to happen IIUC

      * FM radio tuner
      No, ditto. But you've got 20Gb of *good* music in your pocket, why listen to the radio? ;)

      * Semi-decent interface with well-organised playlisting and options. So many cheap flash-based players coming out of Asia these days have terrible interfaces. Also, an iPod-style scroll wheel or similar input device is necessary for scrolling through thousands of songs
      An emphatic YES. The Karma's interface is amazingly intuitive and fast, particularly when it comes to navigating your collection. Artists appear under first-letter tabs, for example, which when you have 500+ different artists makes a whole lot of difference!

      * Ability to sort folders/playlists by date, album, last modified, year and artist et cetera (i.e. dynamic rearranging of playlists, song lists according to ID3 tab information)
      Hmmm. Interesting - I suspect not, though I haven't tried. On the other hand, this is exactly the type of thing the developers at Rio are eating up at the moment . . .

      * Access to other parts of tag information including year and lyrics
      All tag information is available. "Wicked cool" lyrics functionality in the works

      * On-the-fly playlisting
      Check

      * Gapless playback
      Check, for any format that supports it - including mp3.

      * USB 2.0 or Firewire connectivity. Additional ethernet highly desirable
      Check to USB2 and ethernet

      * Can be mounted as external hard drive
      Not at present, although apparently this is in the works

      * 15+ hour replaceable battery essential
      Check to battery life. It's currently replacable in Japan and the word is that this will spread to the US / UK soonish. However, the battery will last for about three years when used 6 hours a day as it is . . .

      The Karma is SUPERB. Really. I may come across like a fanboy, but that's cos I am - it's the first DAP which works EXACTLY how I want it to. The responsiveness of the community makes it second to none IMHO . . .

      P

    3. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by VividU · · Score: 1

      iRiver iHP-120 has most of what you want.

      -OGG, no FLAC
      -Firmware Updates (not as often as we'd like)
      -Optional Remote with its own display
      -Line/Mic IN (Analog & Digital)
      -FM Tuner
      -Semi-Decent Interface
      -DB Sorting
      - No On-The-Fly playlist
      - No Gapless Playback
      - USB 2.0
      - Easily mounts as a external HD
      - 16hr battery (supposedly)

    4. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by sc00p18 · · Score: 1

      That's a lot of features there, pal. And you say those are your minimum requirements. You obviously have a need for many features most people do not. Not to mention the fact that those features would most certainly not be "easy to include on a new player." The thing that really baffles me is your conclusion where you say "I just want to be able to fit all my songs in my pocket and find the right tunes to play when on the train. Is it really too much to ask?" You contradicted your entire post with that sentence, because clearly you do demand more than that. You mods are on crack.

    5. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Theaetetus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Three points - why OGG if you have AAC? Unless you're encoding at 32kbps, AAC has consistantly beat Vorbis in listening tests at all higher (64+) bitrates. Sure, have FLAC, but why Vorbis over MPEG-4?

      Second point is minor, but the advantage of Firewire over USB (even USB 2.0) is that Firewire can supply 1.5 Amps, while USB can only supply 250 mA. If you use USB, you have to have a separate charger. Using Firewire, you can charge while you sync.

      Third point is that where can you find a device with all you've said - recording, high processing power (FLAC, Vorbis), read-while-write RAM buffering (for that gapless playback), ability to run as an external hard drive, etc. - with a 15+ hour replaceable battery? What you're asking for is close to a low-end laptop... With a battery the size of two decks of cards and weighing two pounds. Sure, it's replacable, but do you want to carry around the extra two pounds for the "spare"? Also, most laptops get half that time, so you'd have to double size the battery. Now you've got a 6 pound player, plus a 4 pound "spare" battery.

      Incidentally, if you wanted to do it with AA batteries, you'd need a two pound brick of them to get the current you'd need.

      -T

    6. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Dr_LHA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Works with iTunes and iTMS? NO.

      Oh well. Don't underestimate the power of good software. After using iTunes for a bit I'd be hard pressed to use any other music software. I don't have an MP3 player yet, but I'm considering and an iPod is currently the only choice for me. Steve Jobs knows what he's doing :)

    7. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I get my Ogg files to one of these players in Linux, or do I have to use Windows? Can anyone explain how that works before I buy one of these? I don't do Windows anymore, I have my Ogg files on my harddrive - in Linux, how do I move them to these players? Thanks.

    8. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

      Why radio?

      I listen to my local NPR station, that's why.

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    9. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by brianerst · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Rio Karma comes with a Java app (RMML - Rio Music Manager Lite) that can be run on any OS that has a JRE. The developer of the RMML application is in constant contact with the devlopers of the standard Win32 RMM app, and is also active on the Riovolution message boards.

      I haven't used it myself (I rip everything with EAC, so I tend to use my Windows box for storing my FLACs/Oggs), but it gets glowing reviews by Linux users in the Riovolution forums.

    10. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by nakedsource · · Score: 1

      I bougth the iriver ihp-120 and have been very happy about it. I tried the rio karma and took it back since they now require you to use Realplayer to manage file copying and managament. It wouldn't even show up as an external drive on my perfectly mainstream WinXP box. The iriver has support for ogg vorbis at up to 500kbs. FM tuner, support for mp3 and wma, but not the new wma lossless. Once you install the driver, it looks like an external HD and is easy to copy music over. Windows media player does not recognize it as a protable device yet though. Still, just use drag and drop from you music folders to the iriver, then right click and select update the music db on the folder icon. Very easy, no special software required. It's also firmware upgradable. Battery last for up to 16 hours too.

    11. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm just worried about the menu-system and that little navigation teet. Even the iPod menus are a little bare and restrictive for my liking. I definitely would have to try it out to see if I can get to grips with the jog-button thingy. I've encountered far too many dodgy inputs similar to that to take its quality for granted. Is the Karma's shape uncomfortable at all, either?

      Admittedly, it is a very impressive player. The aspect that attracts me most is the developers' positive attitude to their customers.' feedback Now all I need to do is wait for them to release an 80GB (or larger) version or at least find out how easy it is to hack it open myself. I forgot to mention that I'd find it quite convenient to be able to use it as a backup/portable HD as well as all the above ;)

    12. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by otprof · · Score: 1
      I bougth the iriver ihp-120 and have been very happy about it.

      I'm happy that you like the iRiver. I hope that they gain market share. However...

      I tried the rio karma and took it back since they now require you to use Realplayer to manage file copying and managament.

      False. They have their own RioManager software, plus a java-based version that has basic transfer and playlist functionality. PLUS, you can use the ethernet web-based interface. What would give you this impression?

      It wouldn't even show up as an external drive on my perfectly mainstream WinXP box.

      The "mainstream" nature of your box has nothing to do with it. The file system of the Karma is not designed to show up as an external drive. This is a difference from most other players, but it supposedly makes the FS more stable and fast. What really suprises me is that one would buy a product expecting functionality that it does not claim to have.

    13. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by steveha · · Score: 1

      AAC has consistantly beat Vorbis in listening tests at all higher (64+) bitrates.

      I haven't seen those tests. A quick Google for "AAC Vorbis listening tests" didn't turn up any that were slam-dunk victories of AAC over Vorbis. Could you please point me to some of the listening test results you have seen?

      why OGG if you have AAC?

      Because AAC is covered by patents, and Ogg isn't.

      If the platform you use has a good AAC encoder, and the licensing requirements for AAC aren't a problem for you, then you might as well use AAC. I certainly won't tell you not to do so.

      But keep in mind that a bunch of companies hold basic patents on AAC, and they can change the licensing deal anytime until the patents run out. In practice, you will probably never need to care about this, unless you want to distribute music commercially. But it means that if you use AAC, some companies are allowed to tell you what you can do with your AAC, at least some of the time.

      With Ogg, I have my choice of several players, all free and all legal. I have a free, legal encoder.

      There are now several good players that support Ogg, and in future most or all players will support Ogg. Ogg is a safe bet for the future, with excellent quality at reasonable bit rates. Since I'm already using Ogg, I'm unlikely to change for AAC.

      If you are already using AAC, you probably aren't in a hurry to change for Ogg, either. That's fine with me.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    14. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Quikah · · Score: 1
      why OGG if you have AAC?
      Gapless playback. The codec is designed to be gapless. AAC is not gapless, that sucks.
      USB can only supply 250 mA.
      500 mA actually. The mini ipod can charge from USB port supposedly.

      Pretty much all the HD players EXCEPT the ipod have 15 hour battery life. I don't understand why the ipod is so crappy in this regards, trying to cut corners by using a cheaper battery? The karma has gapless playback for ogg, FLAC, and wma, they are currently working on it for mp3 (it suposedly works if you encode with nogap option in lame, haven't tried).

      After downloading itunes I was SHOCKED that there was no gapless playback. Pretty much killed any interest I had for the ipod.
      --
      Q.
    15. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      Personally, I found the Karma's menus very rich and full-featured, without being confusing. It really is a marvel of interface design, IMHO :)

      Shape-wise, I find it comfier to hold than an iPod. I always found when using the iPod that my thumb was doing too much work, if that makes sense - when doing a serious amount of navigation, it'd ache after a while (damn my lazy, flabby thumbs!) With the Karma, I mostly navigate using the wheel in the top right, which is comfortably in my normal thumb position. You sometimes have to skip over to the "riostick" or menu button, but not enough to cause thumb fatigue . . . if I had to navigate using just the stick, it'd probably drive me mad, to be fair ;)

      Re: hacking, your biggest problem is going to be a drive to stick in the thing! Hitachi only make the 20Gig model at the moment, hence no larger capacity players . . . my (limited) understanding is that it wouldn't be too difficult to do physically, once the drives exist, but whether or not the firmware would like it is a different matter . . . ;)

      P

    16. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      Meh, iTunes leaves me *very* cold. I buy cds and rip them myself, and I mainly listen to complete albums so all this song rating stuff passes me by. Whatever floats your boat, I suppose . . .

      P

    17. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by dave420 · · Score: 1
      No firewire? Pah! Try filling up 20gigs over USB2. Sheesh. What use is a good MP3 player if it takes you all day to copy MP3s to it?

      Also, is it smaller than a suitcase?

    18. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      Good points re: licensing. Not sure they really affect me, or most people, since I'm not commercially distributing music.

      Anyways, here's listening tests at 64kbps. HE AAC beats Vorbis handily, QT AAC not so well... but that's at 64 kbps. 128kbps tests are here.

      There's more here and here.

      Overall, Vorbis seems to be great at low bitrates - 64 kbps, for instance. At higher bitrates, though, it doesn't keep up compared to AAC.

      -T

    19. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by steveha · · Score: 1

      Good points re: licensing. Not sure they really affect me

      In practice, they probably don't. But note that you benefit from Ogg Vorbis even if you don't use it: since Ogg Vorbis is a decent standard and free, the non-free standards can't tighten their grip too much. If licensing AAC becomes unreasonable, Ogg Vorbis will look much more attractive, so AAC licensing will probably always be reasonable.

      here's listening tests

      Sure, those are the ones I found. I read the results a little differently than you did. You read it as "AAC beats Vorbis", and I read it as "AAC and Vorbis about the same".

      That's why I said I hadn't seen one that was a slam-dunk for AAC. At 128kbps AAC won, but it was close: 4.42 for AAC vs. 4.28 for Vorbis, on a 1 to 5 scale. That works out to a 2.8% advantage of AAC against Vorbis, and this on subjective listening tests involving human beings.

      And anyway, if you are like me, you won't use either 64kbps or 128kbps. You'll set it for an extra-high-quality setting where you don't hear any problems. I use -q 6 on the Ogg encoder, which seems to work out to around 180kbps. And the Vorbis files I download from Magnatune.com are encoded aroung 192kbps!

      All of which is a long way of saying that Ogg Vorbis meets the "Good Enough" standard for me, so I'm not interested in anything patent-encumbered. Since I'm already using Ogg Vorbis, I am not motivated to switch.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    20. Re:If I were to buy a new mp3 player... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
      True, true. As an incidental, with a 40 GB iPod, I do everything at 256 or 384 kbps. But then, I'm a snob. ;)

      -T

  50. Awesome, but... by breon.halling · · Score: 1

    For the love of all that is holy... The Beatles and NSync on the same PLAYLIST?!?!?!? WTF? =)

    --
    "Yeah, well, Dracula called and he's coming over tonight for you and I said okay."
    1. Re:Awesome, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they're both overrated boy-bands.

      The past meets the present and they both shudder at the experience.

  51. Re:"Ogg Vorbis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try going to thier site and reading What the Fuck "Ogg Vorbis" means.

  52. The question no one is asking.... DRM by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 4, Informative
    I purchased a NexIIe from Frontier Labs because I wanted a player that had no (or at least did not require) DRM.

    My last MP3 player was a Compaq IPAQ-1. Compaq stopped supporting it and I had a lot of problems trying to get their software to work on Win 2000/XP/20003. I can't just copy my music to its memory cards because guess what? It is stored in a proprietary format. That means you need to have their software which means that if they go out of business or don't support your OS, your nice little gadget is worthless!

    With my NexIIe, I can just plug the device in via a USB cable to my computer and it shows up as a disk drive. I can copy music files (or even copy other files for storage). If I want better performance, instead of connecting the NexIIe, I just pull the CompactFlash card and put it into a card reader. I use no tool more complicated than explorer to manage my music.

    The current firmware even supports CF up to 2GB. I don't see why you would want a 2GB hard drive when you could have 2GB of solid state. That said, it would be nice to have a 10+ GB version of my player.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
    1. Re:The question no one is asking.... DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good reason to not use 2GB of solid state for those of us with finite budgets ($415 for the compact flash, not to mention the $90 for the player)

      To be fair, I have a Nex IIe, and love it, but it just doesn't store enough content at an affordable price. I'm planning to keep the Nex for when I go running, but getting an iPod for all other applications.

    2. Re:The question no one is asking.... DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. That means you need to have their software which means that if they go out of business or don't support your OS, your nice little gadget is worthless!

      Welcome to one of the prime motivators of open source and free software.

    3. Re:The question no one is asking.... DRM by isaac338 · · Score: 1

      2GB CF cards are just little hard drives, FYI.

    4. Re:The question no one is asking.... DRM by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but I think that there are now 2GB CF solid state cards out now (i.e. not micro-drives). They are pretty expensive (~$500)

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
  53. Does EVERY ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    freekin' new mp3/ogg player that comes along HAVE to be Slashdot Front Page news?

    Can we wait until the damn things are actually AVAILABLE TO BUY first?

    These things are a dime-a-dozen, and not one of them is yet an iPod killer.

  54. Apple Legal by gunnmjk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Apple Legal AHOY!

  55. Neuros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hate to mention it (again and again) but the Neuros 20GB model does everything that this promises to do, and you can buy it today for $200. http://www.neurosaudio.com/ Yes, it is bulky, but it does OGG, FM radio record, FM transmit, and a bunch of other stuff. Plus it has a nice Linux app.

    1. Re:Neuros by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 1
      I use a PocketPC with an ftp server and built in wireless. When I turn it on at home, it automatically starts copying the songs most frequently listened to in my RhythmBox library. 20 lines of perl and it's friendlier than Neuros and this Korean toy put together.

      winamp.exe for PocketPC (not the real Nulsoft app) supports vorbis and mp3 just fine, and 512mb SD media cards are a lot cheaper than they used to be.

    2. Re:Neuros by cbiffle · · Score: 1
      Yes, it is bulky


      I already have a bulky device that can record audio, play all sorts of media files, and listen to the radio. I call it a "computer."

      Seriously; I really like that the Neuros people roped some of the Vorbis developers into doing their Vorbis support, for one. I also really like the backpack idea. However, I currently carry my Rio Karma and an FM transmitter in a tiny fake-velvet bag that, even with cords and headphones, is smaller than a Neuros. (I'm judging based on the CompUSA display model with backpack; maybe there's a smaller one out there somewhere, but this thing's quite hefty.)

      Granted, with that setup, I can't record manufactured trash from the radio. :-)

      Anyway, end radio rant...my point here is similar to something the Palm people figured out years ago. If something's small enough, you'll unconsciously integrate it into your life. I've quit using my laptop for music when I go places; the Karma's simply easier. I wouldn't be able to do that with a player that can't fit in my shirt pocket, I don't think.
    3. Re:Neuros by cens0r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your radio rant is entirely subjective to where you live. In seattle we have a few decent radio stations(107.7 and 96.5 just did format chages), one very interesting one (89.5 is a high-school run station playing mainly eurobeat), and one great one (KEXP 90.3 the greatest station on the planet). It makes sense for me to listen to those. Also, the radio is for more than music. It would be nice to get news and traffic updates on my portable player.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    4. Re:Neuros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      20 lines of perl and it's friendlier than Neuros and this Korean toy put together.

      Pretty good line. Only one of Larry's kids would see it that way.

      Still, you're right. I keep thinking that HP is selling iPods so that they can lift all the nice user interface stuff into an iPaq with a hard disk. Why buy an MP3 player when you can get one with a PDA thrown in?

  56. Maybe he has an older computer? by blorg · · Score: 1
    Firewire has been available on computers a lot longer than USB 2. For example, my last 4 laptops all had firewire, but none had USB 2.

    USB 2 is popular now, but it is very new, especially on laptops.

  57. Forgot about Neuros? by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    For my money my favorite is still the Neuros

  58. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by aliens · · Score: 1

    Rio's past players and products have a shitty track record though. I'll wait to see how long the Karma's last before investing. Great to hear it has FLAC support.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
  59. This "iPod" has everything EXCEPT... by gunnmjk · · Score: 0, Troll

    It doesn't work with iTunes! Next article please. Thankyou.

    1. Re:This "iPod" has everything EXCEPT... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      So, what exactly does iTunes do that I care about?

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:This "iPod" has everything EXCEPT... by nicky_d · · Score: 1

      It's just a very nice tool to use with the iPod, that's all. You don't need it, I don't need it, but I do enjoy having it. I don't and can't use the music store, but iTunes makes it very easy to organize, sort and import files through a very nice interface. There's also a lot of scope for extending functionality through Applescript. I'm sure there are lots of alternative apps that do similar things, from proprietary tools to OGG/MP3 handling Perl scripts, and that's great. But an iPod and iTunes have a very nice synergy. One of the features I really like is iTunes' smart playlists, and the ability to create them on the iPod.

      Well, there you go. Some people like it, is all. I think it's a very well designed piece of software and it's certainly the best music handling program I've used. YMMV - try it and see, if you're curious. Won't cost you anything.

  60. the REAL winners in the mp3 player wars by sbma44 · · Score: 4, Funny

    are going to be models with gigantic hands

    1. Re:the REAL winners in the mp3 player wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make a dcube with giant hands? Does it still play ogg?

  61. Can someone help me out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently have been ripping files from my CDs to my harddrive in Linux in Ogg format, and I have wanted to purchase one of these players. But the advertisements I have seen for the players all mention the use of Windows software. Do I have to use Windows in order to transfer the Ogg files to the player? Or can I do it from Linux? I'm confused, I've Googled, and I can't seem to find an answer on this. Thanks in advance to anyone who can give me the 411 on this.

  62. Howard Dean on Ogg by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny

    We shall take Ogg Vorbis to New Hampshire! And South Carolina! And New Mexico! And California! And then we'll take it to Washington, DC! AND TAKE BACK THE IPODS AND WINAMP JUKEBOXES IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Howard Dean on Ogg by Blahbbs · · Score: 2, Funny

      We shall take Ogg Vorbis to New Hampshire! And South Carolina! And New Mexico! And California! And then we'll take it to Washington, DC! AND TAKE BACK THE IPODS AND WINAMP JUKEBOXES IN THE WHITE HOUSE!!

      You forgot something:

      YeeeeeAARRrrRRGGGHHH!

      Thank you.

  63. Calm Down Please by subjectstorm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ok, this thing certainly has A TYPE of scroll wheel. And yes, Apple has patents for its own version of a scroll wheel - as well as the way the wheel itself works and how it works specifically with the i-pod. It could be that this company has absolutely ripped Apple off.

    But Apple isn't suing anyone or releasing statements detailing its intentions to do so just yet, mnk? Lots of things have scroll wheels. My mouse has one. I don't think we can patent a simple hardware control itself. i mean, why not patent a toggle switch if that were the case?

    How about we wait and get just a LITTLE more information before we start branding patents as ridiculous or, on the other end, start a wildly speculative crusade to protect Apple's intellectual property.

    --
    ** Chigusaaa!!! You're the coolest girl in the WORLD!!! **
    1. Re:Calm Down Please by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      My personal thought - does the scroll wheel actually do anything? Considering Apple knock-offs in the past, I wouldn't be surprised to see that it's just a decorative piece, that you use all the buttons around the edge to do things.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:Calm Down Please by plastik55 · · Score: 1

      Apple has patents for its own version of a scroll wheel

      Which patent would that be, exactly? Do you have a number?

      You can start looking here.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  64. FM Transmitter, not receiver by tweakt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    On the korean page you can see "FMT" in the list of features.

    On this page in the flash banner, it lists it as "FM Transmitter".

    I think that's quite a cool feature. Maybe it does both? Dunno... but thats nice to have an FM link built in so I can just carry it in my pocket but listen to it on my car stereo without connecting it to another little box.

    1. Re:FM Transmitter, not receiver by oRiCN · · Score: 1

      Yup both, about 3/4 down the spec page..

      FM Rado & FM Recording

    2. Re:FM Transmitter, not receiver by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Based on how my iPod sucks power with the iTrip on, I'm guessing the battery life won't be so great on this.

    3. Re:FM Transmitter, not receiver by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      won't be available in the UK then

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  65. Down with OGG by GerbilSocks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I swear if I hear another fucking complaint about the lack of OGG support I'm going kill you all!

    Who gives a flying crap about OGG. It's always like Linux users to root for the underdog. In this case however, OGG means shit in the "real" world.

    +5 Troll and +2 Flamebait modifiers.

  66. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by big_gibbon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Erm . . .

    Surely the point is that this *isn't* an iPod? And one of the reasons I chose a Karma was that it, also, is not an iPod. Don't want to be associated with shoddy kit like that :)

    P

  67. DCube DOES NOT HAVE a scroll wheel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has buttons arranged in a circle formation around a central button, but the space in between is not a control surface. As with many other asian product knock-offs, it is designed to look like the ipod, not necessarily perform like it.

  68. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    well, looks he was exagerating, unless ebay has some.

    $259 (after $20 mail in rebate) + free shipping according to pricewatch.com at:

    http://www.shopharmony.com/product.asp?file=PWA& i=

  69. Oops, I was wrong... by tweakt · · Score: 2, Funny
    Sorry, I was mistaken... it has both FM Reception, Recording, *AND* Transmitter. NICE!

    And here is what babelfish thinks it says about "FMT":

    FMT (Wireless)
    Only me small FM broadcasting station! Bold the Wireless MP3 which throws away the line! The NHD-150D the FM thu it will be able to apply a lance meter function with the remote control. The FMT when it selects a mode, what kind of machinery and tools (car audio, groove audio, the groove shear to sprout there is a possibility which the MP3 of sensitivity, the general FM radio back) which is the FM radio it will lead and with the radio it will enjoy. (The outside market to be supported with remote control style, with option star every plan)
    1. Re:Oops, I was wrong... by slantyyz · · Score: 1

      So what happens if you've got the FM transmitter broadcasting at the frequency with which you're listening to the FM tuner?

      As Neo would say, "whoa!"

  70. Dimensions by savagedome · · Score: 3, Informative

    The dimensions are comparable to iPod.

    The iPod mini is 3.6 by 2.0 by 0.5 inches
    The iPod 15GB and 20GB is 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.62 inches
    The iPod 40GB is 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.73 inches
    The D-cube is 88 by 48 by 19 mm (3.46 by 1.88 by 0.74 inches) using the conversion chart

    So, the DCube is smaller in height and width compared to the mini although almost as thick as the 40GB iPod.

  71. Urmm by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    I have to say that design wise, it looks like a poor cheap imitation of the iPod. The iPod is expensive and there are better specced mp3 players out there. the rio karma is an excellent example (mp3,ogg, flac) and inclusion of ethernet socket along with all the other usual connectors. Some people claim the software management software is a little ropey, but at least it works with Linux as well and Win32 and OSX.

    I would personally prefer something like this than something that is such a failing iPod lookalike Wannabe.

    It would be nice if the iPod were a bit cheaper and had Ethernet, Ogg and Flac support to boot. But it aint. I like iPods! They look and feel exquisite, but there are other reasons to buy a product like this and apart from design, function is also pretty important.

    As it is im stuck with a crappy CD based MP3 player. When I get a job ill be getting one, although i havent decided to go with the one that looks nice (iPod) or the one that supports those extra file formats and has an ethernet jack(karma).

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  72. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your prices are off. Its like $350 retail and online about $290-$300 from dealers who are not trying to misled you by taking the $20 rebate off the actual price.

  73. Your opinion is not fact. by Flabby+Boohoo · · Score: 1

    Too much to point out... but the iPod is completely overrated as are most Apple products.

    I have an iRiver iHP-120. After comparing all the drive based models and found that the price/feature balance was better represented with the iRiver.

  74. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Wrong! For audiophiles, FLAC is the very good thing. Ogg is compromise. (MP3 is a joke.)

    This is incidentally why paid-for music downloads are a waste of time.

    You're paying through the nose for sorely inadequate sound quality. (WMA? That joke's so bad it's not funny!) HPH

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  75. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Let me guess you are one of those idiots that spends 2x 3x on t-shirts/hats simply to advertise for a company...

    Do you want to use the damn thing to listen to music or as a status symbol?

  76. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try buying some music sometime.

    If you buy CDs and rip them yourself using anything besides .ogg is just plain silly.

    ogg > mp3

    Any questions?

  77. Re:OGG? What is that about? by vranash · · Score: 1

    Uhmm, WTF are you talking about? Ogg will decode on a freaking SuperSparc 50Mhz with pretty much no lagging. Given the performance of modern embedded processors anything 32bit at 75+ mhz should have no problem with ogg, even less if they use the non-fp decoder. -- vranash

  78. $1 by SengirV · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wish I had $1 for every iPod killer MP3 player that has been released to date. I could then afford an iPod.

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    1. Re:$1 by sacrilicious · · Score: 1
      I wish I had $1 for every iPod killer MP3 player that has been released to date. I could then afford an iPod.

      And I wish I had $1 for every iPod fanatic who comes up with a reason that the iPod is more desireable than whatever clone just came out. Because then I could get an iPod! ;)

      --
      - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  79. More an industrial design issue than patent by blorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the scroll wheel patent would be a pretty minor point in Apple's legal whacking of this device. Its design is an obvious copy of the iPod, and would be actionable under industrial design law. Apple successfully sued EMachines for ripping off the iMac design, and this looks like even more of a rip-off than their machines did.

  80. Show me a drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in an MP3 player that can transfer data at rates anywhere close to either Firewire or USB2.

    On paper it's great to argue the case, but the drive in the MP3 player is where the data ends up, and if it's not as fast as the connection... well that's your bottleneck.

    So, the arguement should be "I'd like to see faster drives in MP3 players so we can utilise the already fast enough interface"

  81. What I want to see in a player... by k12linux · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • Suport for MP3, OGG and FLAC.
    • Wireless for music download/upload
    • A standardized protocol for sharing music wirelessly with other portable owners (for legal sharing of course.. such as the mp3s from a non-evil record label.)
    • Long battery life (when not using the WiFi at least)
    1. Re:What I want to see in a player... by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      The Rio Karma will quite happily sit in its dock while the dock is connected to a wireless access point, or so I've heard . . . supports all the formats you could wish for and more, and the battery life is superb.

      As for wireless sharing . . . would be lovely, wouldn't it? Sadly I very much doubt it'll ever happen :(

      P

  82. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong! For audiophiles, FLAC is the very good thing.

    How does that make him wrong? You're not making any sense!

  83. the engrish site... by spyrral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    makes no mention of the ipod lookalike (NHD-150D). Perhaps they can get away with copying the ipod interface in Korea because of differing IP laws?
    The english site link:
    http://nextway.co.kr/english/

  84. Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sounds like a rapper

  85. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by mydigitalself · · Score: 1

    not to be funny (i run my iPod on Linux) - but does the Karma play nicely on linux?

  86. Might be subjective - since they are grown up. by gosand · · Score: 1
    It's entirely subjective. WFIW I think this is marginally nicer looking than an original iPod.

    Whew. There for a second I thought you were going to say that Josie Davis (ugly sister) was hotter than Nicole Eggert.

    Then I thought - hmm, what did she look like. Hey hey! Doesn't look like she turned out too bad .

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Might be subjective - since they are grown up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy fucking shit! If that's the ugly sister.... I'd hit it in a second, forget the hot one!

    2. Re:Might be subjective - since they are grown up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Nicole Eggert looks like a worn out hag now.

  87. No Firewire? by jafac · · Score: 1

    If there's no firewire, it doesn't compete with iPod.

    Period.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:No Firewire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't complete for you, maybe. The rest of us have USB2.

  88. And your evidence for this is where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the independent double-blind listening tests that will actually confirm your assertions?

  89. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does AAC compare to Ogg/Vorbis ? (when encoded as same bitrate settings)

  90. parent misleading by real_smiff · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ogg lets you avoid artefacts at a lower bitrate than MP3. To say "In MP3, you get audio artifacts [sic?] (usually higher frequencies)" is misleading because, if encoded properly (like LAME 3.90.3 --alt-preset standard) you won't get audible (which is what lossy codecs are all about: hiding audible errors) artefacts in a very high number (like >99.5%) of users&songs. Granted, Ogg is a better codec pretty much but please careful with the over-simplification in explanations :)

    Sorry to go around Slashdot being some kind of mp3-champion but i think it gets an unfair bashing around here sometimes. The LAME team (which I'm not part of) has put an enormous amount of effort into getting transparency at around 200kbps and to say otherwise is doing them a disservice I feel. It is true however that the design of MP3 as a spec has some limitations which are not completely solved even by using very high bitrates, for example, however your post exaggerates the severity of these in real situations. OK I'm done :)

    OT: How do you spell art[e/i]facts anyway? :)

    --

    This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    1. Re:parent misleading by boredMDer · · Score: 1

      OT: How do you spell art[e/i]facts anyway? :)

      artifacts.

    2. Re:parent misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      artefacts.

    3. Re:parent misleading by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Look, he said simple in the first two sentences, surely that clued you in he was being ver simplistic. Which comment would you think that would come of more easily understood, simpler if you will, yours or his??

  91. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by scotch · · Score: 1
    The reasons that I can just say that, and lots of people know what I mean, is the answer to your question.

    Yeah, but the people who know what you mean don't need the answer to the question. Elucicate, oh mystical one.

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  92. I think by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    I'll have to get one of my wives relatives to send me one. :)

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  93. Ha ha no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't underestimate the convenience. 20 gig is enough for many people to rip and download all of their CDs. "

    I have a 30G iPod. It hold about 25% of my CD collection. Fortunately, the firewire connection means I only need an hour to change the music, but I wish I had about 200G to play with in my iPod.

  94. Can you say "trade dress" lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Talk about an open-and-shut case. This thing will never see the light of day looking like it looks in those photos. You can bet the farm on it. Apple Legal will have a C&D out to these guys in no time.

    1. Re:Can you say "trade dress" lawsuit? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      You mean 'cause it's mostly white, right? Besides that, it's mostly generic. Nearly all of the devices out there are roughly parallelpiped boxes with a rectangular display and buttons.

      Yes, the circular arrangement of transport buttons is reminiscent of the iPod, but it's the white color that sets it closer to the iPod than other players. Imagine the Dcube box in either "stainless" or "metallic blue" - then it looks like every other generic player out there.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  95. Hey, wait! by karmaflux · · Score: 2, Funny

    THAT'S NO CUBE

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

  96. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, "How is it different from a scroll wheel on a mouse?"

  97. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by carn1fex · · Score: 1

    Rio Karmas are the slickest players out there imho.. it even has a fricken ethernet port. Also a big screen and good interface design. In case you didnt know, Rio was bought out and resembles the old rio in name only so the previous customer failures shouldn't hound the new company. People are so convinced iPods are the greatest thing in the world that they dont even consider competition to it. My girlfriend wanted to get me an mp3 player for christmas and after much research i decided on the karma. She thought she would suprise me and bought the more expensive iPod and I was blown away at first. After playing with it for awhile im not too impressed. Sound quality is shite, interface is very intelligent tho, although its the one with the touch pad wheel which is neet at first until you try to use it while walking or something. iTunes tho is total crap and pisses me off to no end. And per the original topic, 1.5G??? what self respecting geek finds that useful..

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

  98. There's more to it than product features... by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    >>stop running and accept that you'll eventually pay extra to get an iPod

    Nosir, let me assure you I won't.

    When Apple chose to put politics above business decisions by naming Al Gore to their Board of Directors, I swore off purchasing Apple products forever. As if a man who has never held a non-government job is going to have much to offer a corporation in terms of leadership. And before you think I'm merely a partisan, let me say that I'd feel the same way if it was any other lifelong politican from ANY political party. I believe that Gore's position on the Board exists solely to gain Apple political influence, and that's wrong.

    Problem is, it's not just Apple I'm boycotting. I'll not purchase another Hewlett-Packard printer (after being a loyal customer for years) based on their decision to export, excuse me -- "outsource", American and Australian jobs to India. Same goes for IBM, GE, Sears, Oracle, and Ford.

    Now, before you think I'm just a trolling protectionist, let me explain. I have no alternative than to vote with my paycheck to try to affect change; It's not like our "duly elected" politicans listen to the wishes of the public anymore or act in the best interests of the nation. IMO, they craft legislation based what's been bought-and-paid for by lobbyists. Well, I think it's time to undercut those businesses that put short-term gain over national interests.

    Voting with dollars at the retail level is the only recourse I have and if that's what it takes to get the attention of business and get them to understand that not everyone wants cheap widgets at the cost of the American jobs, at least I'm doing my part.

    1. Re:There's more to it than product features... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... you vote republican? :-P

    2. Re:There's more to it than product features... by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      >Let me guess... you vote republican? :-P

      No. My disdain is split almost equally between the Dems and Repubs for their complete disregard for Constitutional limits on government power and both parties' big-spending ways. I vote Libertarian locally and Constitution Party nationally.

  99. Grammar police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, "The way it scrolls through long lists quickly [comma removed] is no different from any other application where a wheel is used to translate rotational motion into linear input."

  100. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ogg is simply a better codec than MP3.

    Ogg is a container format, not a codec. The thing that bugs me about the confusion is that when people talk about "Ogg format" for players, I don't know whether they are talking about Ogg/Vorbis, Ogg/FLAC, or Ogg/Speex (or any of the others). They are all very different codecs with different tradeoffs.

    Vorbis is the codec that's closest to MP3, but if I was using a player to bring some music to a party, I'd want to load it up with Ogg/FLAC (lossless), which some players can handle. On the other hand, if I was using it to record notes, as some other players can handle, I'd want it to use Ogg/Speex, a highly compressible format optimised for speech.

    Please people - if you are going to compare something to MP3, talk about Vorbis. If you are going to talk about player support, talk about Vorbis, FLAC or Speex. Don't bother talking about Ogg, it's an ambiguous term that means you speak nonsense.

  101. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by pyite · · Score: 1

    I am not the above type of person, yet I own an iPod. Once you own one, you just understand. Every other music player just seems uncivilized.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

  102. Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depends on if you're another person who does not rip their own music, mearly steals it from other people. Kinda sounds like you might be in that catagory. There are people out there that don't belive in ripping off other people. Why not use the best codec? Why not expect products to support what you want? Why pay a tax to the frau^^^^houfenber people?

    --
    "think of it as evolution in action"
    1. Re:Up with Ogg by cei · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you had to pay for MP3 software??? Either for encoding or decoding? I really don't buy the idea that an MP3 tax is a deterrent. Hell, we all bitched and moaned when the GIF tax came around, but did it REALLY have any effect on ANYONE???

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    2. Re:Up with Ogg by shidoshi · · Score: 1

      Wow you're an idiot. I don't give a crap about OGG, and most of my music came from my own CDs. (And when a new single comes out that I just have to have, off to the iTMS I go.) I know so many of the Slashdot crowd like to think that OGG is the next best thing since sliced bread, but not everybody feels that way.

      As well, I use AAC for all of my music now, and I don't seem to be paying any sort of tax to the "frau^^^^houfenber" people.

    3. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1

      "When's the last time you had to pay for MP3 software??" I have it was part of the cost of my rio karma. And I bet part of the cost of windows XP think media player.

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    4. Re:Up with Ogg by cei · · Score: 1

      And the license was probably, what, a couple dollars of your purchase price at most? Is a $5 price difference a deal-breaker?

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    5. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1


      "Wow you're an idiot."
      Wow name calling, boy you sure now how to discuss differences with intelligence. A attempt at furthering the cause and all that?


      Ok you don't care, I got it, deal is you should, ogg is free as in freedom but you don't care right? It's a superior codec, you like to listen to music, why not care? You don't care that it cost more money to use iTMS then own a CD, fine economics is not you're strong suite.
      You don't care about Fraunhofer, you just give you're money to some other company that makes it difficult for people that don't like acc.

      You have to ask yourself does the world revolve around you and only you?

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    6. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1

      Point is it's one I did not want to pay.

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    7. Re:Up with Ogg by dubstop · · Score: 1

      I usually try to avoid arguing with idiots, but for you I'll make an exception.

      Wow name calling, boy you sure now how to discuss differences with intelligence.

      You call somebody a thief because they disagree with you, and then you act all indignant when you get insulted. One day you might figure out that being patronising doesn't make you look clever, it makes you look stupid. Grow up.

    8. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1


      Look maybe I was replying to a troll, you have me there. But please look at it from the context of his first line.
      "I swear if I hear another fucking complaint about the lack of OGG support I'm going kill you all!"

      Impressive no?
      I did not say he was a thief, just infered that he might be. :)
      Now if you are saying "grow up" becasue I responded to a troll? fair enough.
      But to say grow up because I was caustic and dismissive? thats... curiously hypocritical: pot, kettle, black.

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    9. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1

      After rereading your comment I need to ask; you do realize that there were two different people responding right?

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
    10. Re:Up with Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, ideally, you'd buy a portable music player incapable of playing MP3s?

    11. Re:Up with Ogg by Dante · · Score: 1

      Sure. I rip my music, it's all ogg why do I need a mp3 player?

      --
      "think of it as evolution in action"
  103. Up with FLAC! by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    Damn straight! Who cares about these crappy lossy formats! If it doesn't support FLAC, I refuse to buy it!

    (p.s. for the humor impaired, the above is a joke.)

    1. Re:Up with FLAC! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      One man's joke is another man's mantra. I really wouldn't buy a player without FLAC support.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:Up with FLAC! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I use flac for the original copy. Then I transcode for my portable. I got burned by MP3 ad MP3pro (please don't laugh). Now I'll only rip to lossless. FLAC is superfast and GB's are cheap.

      FWIW, using EAC to encode FLAC and foobar2000 to transcode (LAME MP3 engine) is my combo of choice.

      My two missing pieces are finding a good cataloging/playlisting app and something better than WMP for PocketPC. $200+ for a dedcated MP3 player just isn't high on my list right now.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Up with FLAC! by cens0r · · Score: 1

      transcoding is what I do now. I'd prefer not to though. If I have a 20gb HD, I can fit about 50+ albums in FLAC on there at one time. That's more than enough, so I feel like I could skip the transcoding step and just use FLAC all the time.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  104. Why should I pay for an iPod... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... if I don;t want one?

    This device approaches what I would like.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  105. Spelling police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Both artefact and artifact are considered correct, although artefact is preferred in Commonwealth English while artifact is preferred in American English. As with grey and gray, choose whichever you or your editor prefers.

    1. Re:Spelling police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Good to know there was a basis for my confusion (and that it's not an affect/effect type situation) :)

    2. Re:Spelling police by MrBlint · · Score: 0

      Unless you'r programming internet expoorer in which case grey = green!

      --
      That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
    3. Re:Spelling police by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      Actually, I seem to recall my Edinburgh Uni Computer Graphics lecturer spelling it the US way -- and his argument for this was quite compelling.

      The OED defines artefact thus: noun a functional or decorative man-made object.

      Compression "artifacts" are (largely unwanted) side effects of a process. An artefact is the intended product of a process. Therefore, calling it a compression "artefact" is wrong. (However shaky the etymological basis for his reasoning is, I still prefer not to call it an "artefact".

      HPH

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  106. Ogg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ogg is dead! Does anyone still use it?

    1. Re:Ogg? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Streaming it out on my BSD box right now. ;-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  107. Re:OGG? What is that about? by dead+sun · · Score: 1
    He's making perfect sense. OGG is lossy. For people that have equipment that's capable of reproducing fine detail and the ears to pick it out there's a difference. FLAC is lossless, and as such there is no degradation in sound quality from the encoding itself.

    What the original poster was saying is that FLAC is good for audiophiles, because there's no loss of sound quality at all. OGG is a compromise because it sounds pretty good, at least better than MP3 does, but it still can lose definition due to encoding, not just the hardware you're playing it on. Audiophiles care about that sort of thing, and thus FLAC, not OGG, is great for audiophiles.

    Of course, with most portable audio players you'd do more to improve sound quality by getting a decent pair of headphones than by playing OGG than MP3, especially if you use a decent bitrate for encoding. The number of people who keep their stock 25 cent to mass produce earbuds on their $200+ players is pretty sick.

    --
    If not now, when?
  108. So bad. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    -iTunes is not available where I live.
    -I have all my music collection in OggVorbis format.
    -I don't use any of the major desktop OS.
    -I don't need a replacement for my PDA.
    -I don't think it is cool (it looks plasticky, like a toy).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:So bad. by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      -iTunes is available world wide, you can use it to rip CDs in any country. The music store is another issue.
      -I'm sorry to hear that you chose a non industry standard to keep your music library in.
      -There are several open source apps that will sync music libraries with iPod, myTunes written in Java comes to mind.
      -iTunes is not a complete replacement for a PDA, but it does minimize the times you need to carry another device around
      -To each their own. While I think it looks neat, I also almost never see it. It's always in my pocket.

      iPod isn't for everyone, nothing ever is. Except death.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:So bad. by dabadab · · Score: 1

      I gues he is not interested in iTunes, the software, as it does not run on his machine.
      Your excuse regarding Ogg is ridiculous.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    3. Re:So bad. by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      My opinion of Ogg is not rediculous. Ogg is not present in any major consumer electronic device at this point besides a few portable players, nor is it planned for any standards track or inclusion in any major standard.
      MP3 and AAC are both standards, they are both used widely in consumer electronics and are supported by or are part of other major standards and technologies.
      Ogg will likely never catch on as anything but an open source die-hard's codec. The rest of the world will use AAC or MP3. What I mean by this is that no satellite provider, cable TV operator or television station will ever be broadcating audio in Ogg format.
      Why? Nobody's pushing Ogg. Who's sitting down in the board rooms selling Ogg to the executives? Who's putting out the marketing dollars? AAC is likely to be the predominant audio codec, it's already part of other transmission standards (like next generation radio and digital tv broadcasts).
      Who's pushing AAC? Dolby, Apple, Sony,. AT&T amond others.

      Ogg will survive long enough for it to be unnecessary, then it along with all the other codecs will dissapear from use In the mean time it will enjoy a life with small recording artists, game developers and a cult like following in the general public.

      (and yes, I know that Ogg isn't the codec, it's the container. Vorbis is actually the audio codec. To those confused: Ogg is like QuickTime, Vorbis is like MP3 or Sorenson)

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  109. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHA. That was the most hillarious thing I've ever seen. Howard Dean is a freak.

  110. Try one-third of that. by tepples · · Score: 1

    Ogg will decode on a freaking SuperSparc 50Mhz with pretty much no lagging.

    Some of the devices in the marketplace use a 16 MHz ARM7TDMI processor and a dedicated MPEG audio decoder chip (for MP3). I wonder if those can decode even MP2 (MPEG audio layer 2 at 44100 Hz stereo) in software.

    1. Re:Try one-third of that. by vranash · · Score: 1

      Dunno, be interesting to try and find out though.. May go dig up my 486 DX 33 later and try it on that, if the regular ogg codec doesn't work, maybe the integer version will work.

    2. Re:Try one-third of that. by xpyr · · Score: 1

      That might work. the DX's had the math co-processor so it should work. Don't know if it would play it at full quality though. When I tried it on mine SX 33 I had to emulate a math co-processor and even then it was extremely choppy lol.

    3. Re:Try one-third of that. by vranash · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's somewhat promising then :)

  111. USB player by suitti · · Score: 1
    I have one of those 128 MB USB dongles. This is generally enough for a ripped CD. It'd be nice if I could plug it into a player that knows how to mount it, find music on it, and play it. Then, I could "upgrade" my player by getting another USB dongle. Further, if I could plug my USB dongle into my car stereo, I wouldn't have to burn CDs all the time. I bet a USB dongle would never skip, no matter how deep the pothole.

    It's a feature that my USB dongle plugs into a Mac, Windows, Linux without special drivers, and it just works. I can put anything I want on it, up to capacity.

    While we're at it, I want a digital camera where I can plug in a USB dongle.

    I have three digital cameras. Kodak, Samsung and Olympus. They're all USB. They all come with USB cables. There are three different camera side connectors. So, I can't just keep the cables plugged into my PC, because I can't spare three ports (I only have six). The Samsung doesn't talk to my Red Hat 9 (yet) - so there's some sort of protocol change too. Feh. It's got to work out of the box.

    --
    -- Stephen.
    1. Re:USB player by lightningdb · · Score: 1

      Just read about USB On-The-Go today. Could be just the thing you are thinking of. But it looks like it may be a little while of yet. USB On-The-Go

  112. Fighting outsourcing.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... is to endorse subsidies at the expense of local consumers.

    Think a bit about that one every time you ennact your little boycot.

    It is good tiome people would have learn some basics about global economics, but no, the protectionist bug will not be put to rest...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Fighting outsourcing.... by raodin · · Score: 1

      If outsourcing is bad for him (and it probably is) why the hell SHOULDN'T he try to change it?

    2. Re:Fighting outsourcing.... by JonTurner · · Score: 1

      >>... is to endorse subsidies at the expense of local consumers.
      >>
      >>Think a bit about that one every time you ennact your little boycot.

      So by creating an opportunity for *competition*, and doing so by free choice, that's a bad thing?
      I think you, sir, may be the one in need of an economics lesson. Nowhere did I say anything about compelling others to follow my lead.

      Just as HomeDepot has it's place, so does the corner hardware store, and I as a consumer would like the freedom to choose one or the other.

      Scarcity often results in innovation. Would you postulate that competition is a bad thing?

  113. Then buy 4 or 5 256Mb cards. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It is much cheaper and wait for the 2GB to go down in proce.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  114. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

    BTW: IRiver also makes an Ogg-capable portable, several of them, but their 20gig model is about $399. :(

    Coincidentally enough, my iHP-120 arrived the other day, and only cost me 250 :-)

  115. Re:Reason: snobism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hilarious how vile a person can be when driven by pure jealousy... Why don't you just cancel a couple of your porn subscriptions and buy an iPod so we don't have to listen to your rambling anymore?

  116. Proteus. How's this for prior art? by tepples · · Score: 1

    In 1992-1994, I used an Emu Proteus MIDI synthesizer module whose menu was controlled with a rotating knob. Settings in the menu included choosing a recording out of hundreds to use as an instrument sample. Obvious extension to navigating similar menus in sequencer modules. Obvious extension from selecting a .mid to selecting a .mp3. Busted.

  117. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by bubkus_jones · · Score: 1

    How about the ones who don't have huge-ass music collections? The majority of my collection would fit on that 1.5 gig unit.

    However, since most of it is OGG, they wouldn't play.

    So,yeah, as other people have wondered, how well does the Karma work with Linux? I'm getting a new system soon, and I'm getting frustrated with my CD/MP3 Player (I'm not sure whether it's the discs I'm using, my burner or the player).

  118. Scroll Wheel ? That's no Scroll Wheel ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    A "Scroll Wheel" normally refers to a wheel on the side of a device such as a PDA that is used for scrolling.

    What you are referring to here is a "Scroll Pad".

    Wheels turn.

    1. Re:Scroll Wheel ? That's no Scroll Wheel ! by gregarican · · Score: 1
      I think the ghost of George Plimpton will be haunting the Korean company, since his Intellivision commercials back in the day featured the exact same scroll pad you are referring to.

      Maybe Mattel should in turn sue Apple for ripping off the idea!

    2. Re:Scroll Wheel ? That's no Scroll Wheel ! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      I've owned both. They are no more the same thing than UNIX is the same thing as CP/M.

    3. Re:Scroll Wheel ? That's no Scroll Wheel ! by gregarican · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh. It was, like, a joke. I guess a poor one from what I gather...

  119. Please explain to us.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How do you manage to listen to "a few dozen of albums" in any meaningful short space of time.

    Lets say a few dozen albums=4 dozen, that is 48 albums.

    if 1 album= 1CD then you are talking about roughly 48 hours of music.

    Dividing that evenly accros a week that is almost 7 hours a day of music.

    I would be damned if I would be hooked ot a player for that lenght of time.

    Even at the more modest (bust still high) 1 hour per day of music it would take 48 days, that is 1 month and a half to listen to all that.

    So I don't believe all this rubish that you need that much music, it is simply physically impossible to listen to all of it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Please explain to us.... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, if you're a robot who plans what music you're going to listen to in the next 48 hours in advance then your calculation makes sense. But it doesn't make sense for humans.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    2. Re:Please explain to us.... by andreMA · · Score: 1
      Of course everyones listening habits are personal, but you left out the distinction between listening to it all and having it all available.

      I know that if I load up 48 albums for a 1-week trip, even if i only listen to it for half an hour a day I will inevitably find myself in a mood where I want to listen to something in particular that I don't have with me.

  120. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    flac is whack. All the shn is where it's at. Does anybody support them?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  121. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by AnyNoMouse · · Score: 1
    not to be funny (i run my iPod on Linux) - but does the Karma play nicely on linux?

    I'm not sure 100% of the Rio software is available on Linux, but the Rio itself has a webserver (over ethernet) and can run a rather nice Java client to transfer music and files with. I've also seen post from several users on the riovolution.com website that mention that they are running Linux.

    --
    -Redundancy Man strikes again!
  122. Zaurus with WiFi card. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    It works like a charm.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  123. What ever happened to him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was cool.

  124. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit being a flaming ball of nerd and buy an iPod. Nobody uses Ogg but nerds. There isn't a normal person on the planet who meets the following criteria:

    1) Knows what Ogg Vorbis is
    2) Gives half a shit if a device supports it

    I swear some of you people must maturbate to Ogg. "If it doesn't have Ogg support I won't use it, if it doesn't have Ogg support I won't use it, if it doesn't have Ogg support I won't use it." Shut the fuck up already. We get it. So does Apple. Which is exactly why they won't be adding Ogg support to the iPod.

  125. I don't know about the rest of you... by RegalBegal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But, in my personal opinion. If i'm throwing down ANY amount of cash for a music related product I'm going to go with something that has proven itself simple as that. In the late 80's and 90's It was sony, aiwa and panasonic that made good quality portables. Now it's Apple. In three years they have pretty much solidified their branding, quality and user loyalty. So when the option came I got an iPod. Just like I bought a sony sport walkman, and an aiwa portable CD player later to be lost and i got a panasonic. Here comes the point. Some no name Korean branded company is producing an obvious knock-off. Granted you could take a chance, but if I can save 99 bucks for a player I can definitely save a bit more for quality. I'm sick of Ogg vorbis. It's better than mp3 at low bitrates....anyone who is decoding at a low bitrate doesn't concern themselves with quality of sound. I am quite a huge music fan and have ripped near 7000 songs from both CDs and FLAC files (live bootlegs) for use on my iPod, and you can speculate all you want read a million graphs and articles concerning codecs. But to my ear and the ear of many of my peers (all involved with music in one way or another) unless you're listening to the music through a $3000 HiFi with $500 german made sound canceling ear phones. You will hear no difference to your ear (between mp3 and Ogg). Doubt it? try it. So back to the point. The dCube touts all this while being made by some no name company that makes electric toothbrushes as well (heh). I wouldn't buy this product regardless of price just for that reason. The same reason I won't buy an audio product from
    • RCA
    • Quassar
    • GE
    • Audiovox
    • iRiver
    All these budget companies have created audio crap since i've known about them. What makes you think something thrown together ripping of a patent and having all these features for dirt cheap is going to be worth the money or the ink used to print it. I think the 1 out of 5 Ogg users need to find a different codec or brew up their own firm ware for a decent product. It seems everything wants to touch the iPod but as of right now none of them have all of these Loyalty, Quality, good branding, a good track record of not making audio garbage, international support forums (ie ipodlounge), and excellent 3rd party accesory support. iPod is the new "i'll have a coke" and " can i have a kleenix" The only thing at this point that can kill the iPod is a better iPod. _g
    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
    1. Re:I don't know about the rest of you... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      I have an iRiver MP3/CD player and I must say that it is impressed me greatly. It just works. The interface is a little confusing at first, but beyond that the thing is great. hundreds of times better than any portable CD player I've ever used.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  126. Re:OGG? What is that about? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that Ogg Vorbis is not patent-encumbered like MP3 happens to be. Have we already fogotten the lessons learned by the Unisys GIF/RLE patent fiasco?

  127. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by AnyNoMouse · · Score: 1

    There have been a couple of deals in the past where you could get one for $250. It's usually priced in the $280-$300 price range.

    --
    -Redundancy Man strikes again!
  128. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Circuit City has the RIO KARMA for $252, and then take $20 off of that with the rebate, so its $232. This is the in-store price, online it is MUCH higher. Last saw it about two weeks ago, and this wasn't a sale price.

  129. price and date by drunkasian · · Score: 1

    considering most of their other (seemingly lesser) products go for W200,000-W300,000 ($150-$250 ish) my guess is it won't be "cheap enough"... the korean at the bottom says it will be out late february to early march (and that the specs can change without notice... right)

  130. Re:Mp3 players will be next market Apple will lose by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

    Blah, blah, blah. If they can't produce enough, seems to me that they must be selling as fast as they can make them, even overpriced as you say. So, what the hell is your point, coward? Oh, and what is the anwser, anyway?

    --
    Karma Schmarma
  131. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can also play uncompressed audio formats (WAV & AIFF) if sound quality is really your issue.

  132. Beatmania anyone? by tepples · · Score: 1

    you do not scroll it by grasping it (pong) or by thumbing the edge of the wheel (scroll mouse, the sony jog dial) but by spinning the wheel from the face to select from a list.

    Beatmania, an arcade game series made by Konami, involves spinning a wheel from above to select a song. The first Beatmania machine was sold to the public in 1997.

  133. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    hahahhaha.. i took a look at the link and it makes sense.

    The problem is that altavista seems to be doing a literal translation (taking each word and translating it). The problem is that the grammaticaly form of korean is different than that of english (and similar to Japanese, and I think Chinese and Hungarian).

    The difference between this grammar (I don't kwow the official linguistic name for it) and english grammer is noun and verb placement. For instance:

    In English, one would say: "I'm going home".

    In Korean, one would say: "To home I go."

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  134. Only if they are real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think silicone sinks.

    1. Re:Only if they are real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most breast implants are a saline solution nowadays. Whether they're lighter than sea water or not would depend on the amount of salt in them.

  135. Dean on Tuesday's Today show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait. It gets funnier. Katie Kouric is interviewing Dean. In the background, you hear the "Yeeeow!"

  136. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tobad the interfaces BLOW ASS.

  137. Re:OGG? What is that about? by cens0r · · Score: 1

    which ogg? Do you mean vorbis? because if so, I'm just silly. I rip all my CD's to FLAC.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  138. FM Tuner by smcavoy · · Score: 1

    What is with all of these mp3 players coming with tuners?
    Did I miss something? When did radio begin to *not* suck?

    1. Re:FM Tuner by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 0

      Amen to that! It's even funnier coming from supposed hi-tech geek types!

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:FM Tuner by cens0r · · Score: 1

      There is good radio out there. I'm sorry if you don't live in a city that has it. But besides that, I wouldn't mind the option of turning on NPR or local news on my commute to work. It would be nice to hear traffic, weather, and other stuff on the bus ride.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    3. Re:FM Tuner by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Sports. Ogg or MP3 or AAC won't help me listen to the game while I can't be at home or in the car...

      Talk radio. NPR and Community radio programs that can be quite interesting - but are time sensitive...

      Traffic/Weather. Kinda nice to hear the traffic / weather even before I get to my car or even leave the office.

  139. Exactly! by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    I've got every CD I own, and ever album I've downloaded from Emusic.Com or purchased through ITMS on my iPod. Having that much choice is a wonderful thing.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got every CD I own, and ever album I've downloaded from Emusic.Com or purchased through ITMS on my iPod. Having that much choice is a wonderful thing.

      What's the big deal about having 2 whole albums with you? :-)

  140. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sound quality is shit? try using good headphone fool.

  141. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by cens0r · · Score: 1

    If they would just add FLAC support... or if the Rio Karma would add the FM tuner I'd finally be happy.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  142. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by modecx · · Score: 1

    From the FAQ on the website you linked to:

    Can I use Karma with Linux or my Mac?
    Yes. RMMLite supports Linux and OSX. It is developed by resident Java god, Mike Schrag, and is constantly being updated. You may connect to it via your ethernet hook-up on your Karma docking station. Currently, you can transfer files but cannot do firmware upgrades via ethernet. RMMLite resides on a webserver on your Karma, included with each new firmware update. More current updates may be found at this site.

    Looks neat. Wish I had $300 to burn.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  143. It's not a wheel, it's a knob by ajs318 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    It's not just a wheel. The wheel is just the physical interface. There's also the way it scrolls through long lists quickly, and the way it interacts with the other buttons, that make it such a great and unique piece of interface design.
    What the hell are you smoking? It's a bloody knob, for crying out loud! Wireless sets have had a bloody great knob for changing the station pretty much ever since they were invented. True, this one's connected to a shaft encoder as opposed to a variable capacitor or a pot, but that's hardly unique; and you actuate it from the top surface rather than around the rim, but at the end of the day it's nothing more than a fancy knob. I seem to remember there being a similar kind of thing on some DJs' CD players, where a revolving disc is used to search for a specific passage. And I think there was something similar on posh VCRs, but I was always too poor to afford one like that :) That was the state of the art as it was prior to the advent of the iPod.
    You can't just say "It's a wheel!" without recognizing the enormous amount of effort and care that went into its design and engineering. The wheel is what makes the iPod unique, and it deserves its success because of it.
    That is the most pretentious piece of obsequious toadying I have heard in a long time.
    This is one of the good uses of patents, in the sense that it gives a manufacturer a temporary monopoly as a reward for innovative design, and will hopefully spur other innovative designs in the iPod comptetitors.
    Good use of a patent my arse. That patent should never even have been awarded in the first place. Whoever was responsible for not throwing it straight out has a lot of explaining to do.
    Seems like a good thing to me.
    Just get your face out of Jobs' arse, will you? People like you give Apple fans a bad name.
    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:It's not a wheel, it's a knob by rev063 · · Score: 1
      Have you ever tried to design a user interface? If so, would you ever have claimed to designed a good one? Truly good user interfaces are few and far between. See Alan Cooper's book for plenty of counterexamples. In particular, see Chapter 9 "Designing for Pleasure" for another good use of a wheel in interface design. (Use Amazon's "Search Inside the Book" feature around page 138.)

      But isn't there prior art? The iPod's wheel is for navigating music, unlike a VCR jog wheel or the cellphone examples others have given, and that makes it different for a start. The way the scrolling accelerates to navigate a long list, as another poster pointed out, is also unique. IANAL, but I think there are enough unique features here to warrant a patent.

      But the final verdict, for me, comes from this: plenty of other manufacturers have attempted to produce an iPod killer, but by universal consent, none are as easy to use. I think that's enough to prove that the iPod's design is worth of recognition.

      Once again, I remind you: all good design is obvious, but only in retrospect.

    2. Re:It's not a wheel, it's a knob by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for prior art on using a wheel to select music, look at the AMI juke box. I'm sorry I didn't think of this sooner. On the cheaper models, instead of separate letter and number buttons, you spun a wheel to select a record, the letters and numbers in a window changed, and you pressed a button to play the record - selected from a "menu" - whose letter and number were currently showing. This saved on separate solenoid actuators. The wheel was spun from the edge, and due to the direct mechanical coupling there was no artificial acceleration effect {but obviously if you shoved it harder, it went faster, up to a point}. Otherwise I think it's prior art in this case.

      Some things just should not by their very nature be patentable, and I think the way a control actuator works is one of them. Otherwise what will you allow to be patented next?

      No, if you want to patent daft things, try patenting personal injuries. I'm surprised the National Ambulance Followers' Federation haven't got their members offering such a service already. Then not only can you claim compensation when you hurt yourself, you can also claim royalty payments the next time someone else hurts themself the same way you did!

      Unless I could patent the idea of patenting an injury in order to maximise the payout for yourself and your legal representatives, in the event of an accident that was not your fault ..... But what if somebody already patented the idea of patenting an idea for patenting something, in order to earn big money claiming a fee from me every time I claimed a fee from a lawyer who was helping a client claim a fee from an injured party using a method I had patented? Where will the madness end? Sooner or later all the money in the world will belong to lawyers, and nobody would be worth suing even if anybody could afford it!

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  144. Rio Karma & linux by David+Jao · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can I get my Ogg files to one of these players in Linux, or do I have to use Windows? Can anyone explain how that works before I buy one of these? I don't do Windows anymore, I have my Ogg files on my harddrive - in Linux, how do I move them to these players? Thanks.

    The only way to transfer songs is Linux at the moment is through the ethernet interface, because the USB interface does not implement the mass storage standard.

    You have to connect the Karma player to your LAN (using either dhcp or keying in a static IP into the device). Then you point your web browser to the embedded http server on the player and download a java program that you can use to transfer songs. The program is not fancy but it has all the essential features it needs for daily use.

    It must be mentioned that you cannot upgrade the firmware from Linux yet.

    On the whole, I would say that the process of transferring songs in Linux is harder than with the Korean made players, but still easier than trying to get the iPod to work in Linux since at least Linux is supposed to work out of the box.

  145. Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've dealt with many prosumer and professional video decks that use the jog/shuttle wheel for navigating their menus and, though not for music, I can't imagine what else the wheel would be used for except to navigate through "lists" of video scenes.

  146. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, "I'm going home" in English becomes "to home go" in Korean. Notice the lack of subjects--there's no "I," or "you" in the Korean phrase (colloquially speaking ,that is). I've heard that Korean is closer to Japanese and Finnish; however, I am no expert on Finnish language.

  147. Re:OGG? What is that about? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    so use AAC.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  148. Re:OGG? What is that about? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

    Audiophilia? I suppose it has some point, but ultimately what you get out of great music isn't about the sound quality, it's about the performance. I know I'd far rather listen to an old scratchy record (or an mp3) of Maria Callas or Joan Sutherland than a near-perfect DAT recording of some lesser opera singer.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  149. Ogg Vorbis is a stupid name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is it with you Linux geeks and product naming? can't you guys understand product naming is important? i'm not gonna be caught dead saying "oh, it's not an mp3, it's an ogg vorbis file."

  150. gapless playback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    mp3 doesn't support gapless playback. mp3s have encoded silence IN THE FILE. Thus if you play them back to back (as the iPod does) you still end up with a gap.

    The Karma does have crossfading though, his some people thinkg is as good as gapless playback. Sometimes it is, sometimes it isn't, IMHO.

    The ethernet on the Karma is a joke. Small points for having it, but have you used it? It took me something like 80 minutes to put 3 gigs of music on a Karma over ethernet. And even though the dock has lineout and ethernet, you cannot control the Karma remotely. You can make a playlist remotely, but you can't even start it, let alone skip forward and backward. Lame.

    Note USB 2.0 sync speeds are normal, it's just ethernet which is horribly slow.

    1. Re:gapless playback by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I accidentally left crossfading on when I d/l'ed WinAmp3 a while back. I queued up a book to listen to, and had quite a shock at the end of the first / beginning of the second tracks. At first I thought it might be voices in my head.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:gapless playback by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realise this. But the thing is even if the iPod supported Ogg Vorbis that doesn't guarantee it would produce gapless playback. The iPod doesn't double-buffer so if your songs are bigger than 32MB you're screwed. Even worse, it consistently fails to provide gapless playback on .wavs...

      Personally, I believe that crossfading is a poor substitute for true gapless. Ever tried playing some Pink Floyd or Tool?

    3. Re:gapless playback by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      > mp3 doesn't support gapless playback

      Kinda true. Lame mp3s encoded with --gapless hold enough information to let a gapless enabled player know when a track *should* end, even if that's halfway through a frame. In addition, the Karma developers (realising that not everyone encodes --gapless) have put intelligence into the player that detects a drop to silence in the middle of the last frame, and cuts that silence out. This works *REALLY WELL*. I mainly listen to mix albums where it's far too obvious if gapless play isn't implemented, because the beats don't match up - and it seems flawless to my ears.

      As for the ethernet - no, it isn't speedy, but that's kinda the nature of ethernet. One sync overnight and then it should just be topping up from there on in though . . .

      P

    4. Re:gapless playback by Quikah · · Score: 1

      There is some preliminary gapless support in the Karma for mp3. It does work on some files I have tried, others I get small clicks. This is not crossfading, my crossfading is turned off.

      The rio developers were looking into implementing the Foobar2000 method which CAN play mp3 perfectly gapless by examing the Lame headers to determine the silence length. They posted about it on riovolution forums which are down at the moment.

      Here is a nice page comparing to ipod which, judging from using itunes for a bit, has anti-gapless playback.

      http://www.pretentiousname.com/mp3players/

      Currently I am encoding the songs which don't quite work gapless as oggs (which play back gaplessly perfectly) and everything else as mp3. Works well for me.

      --
      Q.
  151. The IPOD killer isn't nice, it's cheap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make your IPOD clone out of solid gold and have it fix me breakfast if you want, but someone will be out there saying "The IPOD is better."

    If you can sell one for $100, however, THEN you'll be able to push apple's market share around like the little nancy you wish it was.

    Adam Thorne

  152. newsflash: iTunes sucks dick by turkeyphant · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    What the hell? I couldn't bear using iTunes. It's bloated and featureless. Its sole purpose is to help me steal music over the school network with the assistance of MyTunes.

    I use EphPod to put music on my iPod. When I'm using GNU/Linux, XMMS is my musical staple. If I'm booted into Windows, I'll use WinAMP 2.x to play my music over iTunes every time. iTunes has shitty encoding options - it doesn't even come close to EAC with LAME or whatever your encoder of choice is. However, my biggest complaint about iTunes is its insatiable hunger for resources and slow response. Plus, it takes up half my screen, has zero customisability and I can't find a half-decent visualisation for it anyway.

    Good software, my eye.

    1. Re:newsflash: iTunes sucks dick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait, what the fuck? This guy gave satisfatory reasons and provided details of alternatives. iTunes is poo, admit it.

  153. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by turvalon · · Score: 1

    That's also why I use Right Guard. Anything else would just be uncivilized

  154. Neuros Mp3 player, 20gig, fm modulator, opensource by Antilles · · Score: 1

    I just picked up a Neuros 20gig player with an fm modulator, etc for 192.00 USD. It even has an opensource package that goes with it so you can do what you want with the unit, as well as store any sort of files on it. I believe it has Ogg Vorbis support as well, as someone took the opensource project and added it. just a nice package that is sort of under the radar.

  155. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by steveha · · Score: 1

    What's your deal, man? "flac is whack"? Could you be, perhaps, a little more specific than that?

    FLAC is an open, free standard. Shorten is owned by the guys who wrote it. Does "anybody" support Shorten? Talk to the Shorten guys.

    But it's probably already too late. Several portable players already support FLAC. Magnatune.com offers music in FLAC format. The train already has left the station, and Shorten was not on board. Why would a company pay to license Shorten when they can use FLAC for free, and FLAC is better?

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  156. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by qcubed · · Score: 1

    unrelated to chinese. chinese uses the SVO order like english:

    (subj) (verb/action) (object)
    i go home

    while japanese and korean share the SOV. the reason why the subject is dropped is that as in japanese, the subject is frequently already understood and denoted in context by a sort of "topic marker":

    na-nun chiberu kanda
    i'm home going

    finnish and hungarian are related in the finno-ugric language group, so share similarities; it's been suggested that korean and japanese also fall into a larger group, ural-altaic, which includes the finno-ugric group. the chinese languages are all in the sino-tibetan group.

  157. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because it's an iPod."

    Translation:Because I'm a sucker for Apple marketing.

  158. iTunes/iPod may support OGG, WMA already. by payote · · Score: 0

    At least internally at Apple, someone has been thinking about this stuff. In OSX, control-click on iTunes, from the pop-up menu select 'Show package contents' - open 'Contents' folder - open 'Resources' folder. See the iTunes-ogg.icns file? And the iTunes-wma.icns file? Somebody has created the icons for those types of files... why would they do that?

    --


    Never pet a burning dog.
  159. I agree, my old monitor has a scroll whell for adj by thenarftwit · · Score: 1

    Boy, does that patent sound stupid, my old monitor has a scroll wheel for monitor adjustments...press it to bring up adjustments screen, rotate to desired icon, press again to adjust, adjust, press again to select exit icon, press again to exit. Also, what about 20 odd years ago when those big supercomputer cad consoles had those prgrammable panel of round knobs that could be programmed to adjust cad drawings (i assume)???? Is the patent office stupid...you shouuld check out the article on the register www.thregister.co.uk about the UK patent office changes to small co. patent law where the patent office (themselves) can now determin the outcome of disputes...

  160. See now? by stealth.c · · Score: 1

    People AREN'T ignoring OGG format. Hooray!

  161. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rio's past may be shoddy, but by all accounts they have now been taken over by one of the bigger audio players in the market who own both Denon, and Marantz http://www.dm-holdings.com.
    I have bought both of the above, and would trust them to produce audio equipment a lot more than I would a computer company.

  162. Drectangularprism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a cube!

  163. Re:Reason: snobism by TechniMyoko · · Score: 0

    so if someone hates something its automatically viewed as jealousy? but dont most ppl on this site hate microsoft?

  164. Re:OGG? What is that about? by skzbass · · Score: 0

    guys, what is a good ripper for FLAC? and how lossy are WMAs? thanx

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  165. How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the second 1.5gb device I've seen and the second with wireless I've seen. They all share something in common and that is No one has said how much the stupid thing costs! Has anyone seen a price tag?

  166. Thanks guys, I appreciate yr answers (NT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks

  167. freak by sulli · · Score: 1
    Howard Dean is a freak.

    that's why I'm voting for him!

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  168. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought Charles Barkley was dead... ?

  169. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by mattgreen · · Score: 1

    Wow that sounds almost as intelligible as some of the Ogg slashbots trying to make a point!

  170. Re:Neuros (Karma battery) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, we'll see how you do when the Karma's battery dies. If it's anything like the iPod, good luck. $50 DIY with a lot of futzing, or $100 from Apple. The Neuros battery replacement is $12 plus postage. Of course, knowing Rio, you'll be SOL, but you can always just buy their latest player.

  171. Re:Reason: snobism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so true. Someone actually did a study and found that 70% of iPod users were homosexuals, in fact. I'm not sure what that proves... but at least it explains the faggy design.

  172. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by silence535 · · Score: 1

    Would you tell me where you purchased it?

    I have been looking for this one and could not find a place to buy it below something about 430eur.

    I really think this is odd, the Euro is at 1.30 Dollars and still all the products cost a lot more Euros than Dollars. Something in the world trade system is seriously broken.

    TIA,

    -silence

    --
    Dyslectics of the world, untie!
  173. Karma also has a SCROLL WHEEL by Burz · · Score: 1

    HOW could you forget? :-)

  174. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    ah.. thanks for the clarification.

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  175. Re:Babelfish Translation of the Korean Product pag by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 1

    yes, correct. I guess I through the "I" in there even though it's really implied (like the other replyer said).

    --


    "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  176. My demands are not extreme by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

    Well, I'm no expert, but as far as I'm concerned all these features have been achieved across several successful and affordable players. I can't see it requiring a significant technological leap to put them all on one device. Most are simple tweaks (firmware updates and UI) or necessary for the easy playback of my music (sorting by tag info, gapless playback).

    From what I've learned, it seems that the only people likely to be of any help in this matter are the makers of the Rio Karma. Why is it that Apple can put Solitaire and an address book on the iPod but are still incapable of pulling their thumbs out and including basic double buffering?

    Sure, maybe I could live without the inline remote and FM tuner, but I can see no reason why manufacturers would leave out such features that require so little effort to include...

  177. Too late by bahamat · · Score: 1

    I bought my Rio Karma yesterday and it pretty much rocks my world.

    I had a little trouble starting off because the java app they included for transfering songs (only for non-windows) was corrupting files in the transfer.

    If you get the new one from the website (they say it's 1.02 but it's really 1.01) it works like a charm.

    The 1.5G models are a novelty I think. For just a little bit more you can get a much larger capacity. Also with the 1.5G you have to decide what you want to take with you today. With the 20G Karma I take everything that I bother to care about.

  178. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comp-u-plus has them for $268 with a $20 rebate on top of that. http://www.compuplus.com/insidepage.php3?refer=cne t.com&id=1001537
    Ok, how do I change the clicky details ?

  179. Re:"Ogg Vorbis" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I don't think it's a troll, I think that's a reasonable question. But I like the name, it is VERY memorable. From the first time I heard of the Ogg Vorbis codec, I have never forgotten the name. By the time I got around to finally ripping into that format, I wasn't sitting there scratching my head wondering, "now what was the name of that format again?"

  180. Media Center by meehawl · · Score: 1

    After using iTunes for a bit I'd be hard pressed to use any other music software.

    Your sad but temporary state of ignorance no doubt proceeds from the fact that you haven't yet tried Media Center.

    --

    Da Blog
  181. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EAC. Very.

    (Use Google)

  182. Better pic by SoupaFly · · Score: 1
    You're right, she grew up nicely.

    I think this is a better pic though.

  183. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by snol · · Score: 1

    Besides it's not you'll lose any quality if you need to turn some of your shn's into flac files. should be pretty fast too.

  184. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not gapless though if that's an issue too.

  185. Re:OGG? What is that about? by arose · · Score: 1

    Ogg. FLAC if your hearing/equipment is better than average. Vorbis for us mundanes. And Speax for audiobooks. :-)

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  186. Sigh... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1
    I have a subset of tunes to play at work, just the things I want at hand all the time. It's forty gig. My whole collection? 80 gig.


    That's one of the main reasons I haven't bought an iPod. None are big enough.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  187. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    It's not an iPod though. The 1.5GB player he was referring to is the Dcube, it being the subject of the story and all. Try to keep up.

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  188. Stability by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    I had a NEX II (not IIe) player that simply deadlocked after a while - out of the blue. There are quite a few people who reported similar behaviour.

    Not to mention the fact that navigation is poor.

    Furthermore, a 1GB flash card can be quite expensive (> 200$). A 1GB card + NEX player is just as much as a 20G HDD based player. Yes, you do get awesome battery time, but you're also very likely to listen to the same tune twice within that battery time.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Stability by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

      Flash cards price are constantly dropping. I meant my rant to be more directed towards the value of "no DRM" vs the [dis]advantages of a flash player vs a HD player.

      If apple sold an ipod that played MP3s and would act as a removable storage drive w/o drivers -- I'd buy one in a heart beat.

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
  189. It's iPod's uglier brother!! by ColMustard · · Score: 1

    This is the worst iPod knock-off I've seen yet, and I'm sure the scroll-wheel interface helps out a lot. Yikes.

    --
    Moof.
  190. Re:OGG? What is that about? by cens0r · · Score: 1

    I don't rip to FLAC because my equipment or hearing is superior (my hearing has been going downhill of late). Although I can sometimes hear artifcats when I'm really listening, even VBR lame encoded MP3's sound good enough for most cases. The reason I rip to FLAC is that I see my rips as backups as well. Since they are a backup I want all the information there.

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  191. Re:Reason: snobism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People call MS users snobs?

  192. But what about OGG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, they've got Ogg, but what about OGG?

    Don't even get me started on O.G.G.!

  193. Lost in translation... by steevo.com · · Score: 1

    The MP3 the sound quality and the enemy who jump over a file 500Kbps until it will be able to remake the ogg file which is proud a dosage from the NHD-150D.

  194. Mis-named by fullofangst · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Most noticeable however is the scroll wheel, Apple holds patents (pending) on scroll wheel design"

    Oh guys, guys, GUYS! This is NOT a scroll wheel! A scroll wheel is something a mouse has! This is a JOG DIAL!

  195. Does not bode well by switcha · · Score: 1
    Well, considering the two song titles listed on the things screen, it doesn't look good:

    "Yesterday" and "Gone"...

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  196. Continuous Scrolling by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    The Apple Scroll Disk allows for uninterrupted continuous scrolling- this is not possible with one finger on my Clie's Jog Wheel or my Logitech's Scrollwheel.

    Totally better to quickly and accurately scroll through long lists without lifting and starting over.

  197. Re:OGG? What is that about? by VickyNaylor · · Score: 1

    For the same compression ratio I'd defy anyone to hear the difference between mp3 and flac. especially if using vbr.
    I'm not saying that there is no difference I just strongly doubt that the difference is audible.
    Surely the best format is the one that gives the best compression for a given level of percieved quality.

    --

    ---
    imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie...
  198. lol ipod lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iPod LOL

    I can't imagine a more un-intuitive interface, and a casing that could be any uglier. I cannot fathom why people masturbate to the iPod's 'features' What a hunk of junk

  199. Re:OGG? What is that about? by MrBlint · · Score: 0
    In fact WMA has a lossless mode. But unfortunately I can't tell you how well it compresses compared to FLAC because - "Windows Media Lossless is only available on select versions of Windows." (my italics)

    what a bunch of jerks.

    --
    That's very perceptive of you Mr Stapleton and rather unexpected in a G Major
  200. Simple enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oog think mp3 good enough

  201. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

    I got it here. Price seems to have gone up to ukp 255 now but still a bargain at that price.

  202. Re:OGG? What is that about? by arose · · Score: 1

    I knew I forgot something, damn lossy memory. ;-)

    --
    Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  203. Sigh.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The legitimate fight is promoting quality, not incentivaiting bad companies that happen to wrap itselves in the glorious US flag...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  204. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Ankle · · Score: 0

    Its actually $280-300USD retail in stores last I looked and $260-290USD online _WITHOUT_ including rebate. I ordered mine for $280USD from etronics.com and that is once again that's _without_ the rebate.

  205. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Ankle · · Score: 0

    The Rio Karma has a fast and simple GUI, I'ved tried out all the different players out there and none even compare to it. Karma > *

  206. I am not a robot.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    But I have a basic level of organization that is obviously saving me a good deal of money in fancy music players :-).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  207. Re:OGG? What is that about? by slantyyz · · Score: 1

    Ogg is not simply better. It all depends on what you mean by "better".

    If you have a portable player, better may not mean Ogg. What good is Ogg if you've got an iPod? Even if you do have a portable player that supports Ogg, like the Rio Karma, Ogg drains the battery more than MP3 would.

    So in some ways, Ogg is better. Don't discount MP3 just because it isn't Ogg. Sure my Karma can play lossless FLAC and lossy Ogg, but because I also have other equipment that doesn't support Ogg, it doesn't really make much sense, does it?

    FYI, Ogg is not a good thing for audiophiles. FLAC/APE are much better, since they're lossless. And whether Ogg is better than MP3 is debatable as well. There are some people who think LAME has a better psychoacoustic model than Ogg. I'm sure the LAME vs Ogg argument is enough to start a flame war between each of its proponents.

    I'll stick to my LAME 224ABR encoded MP3s, thank you.

  208. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    except that ugly hack of a control mechanism they use, im glad and hope they get it patented so that other companies are discouraged from using that.

  209. Re:Rio Karma supports Ogg and FLAC with 20gb for $ by gr · · Score: 1

    I transfer music to my Karma through the Java client running under Linux syscall emulation on NetBSD. So, yes.

    --
    Do you have a /. uid shorter than five digits? No? Then piss off.
  210. Re:Reason: snobism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It proves that you suck at making shit up that people will believe.

  211. The Rio is almost 50% larger than the iPod. by JamieF · · Score: 1

    The Rio Karma is 46% bigger than the iPod (78% thicker).

    20GB Apple iPod: 6.1 cu in
    20GB Rio Karma: 8.91 cu in

    20GB Karma: 2.7" X 3.0" X 1.1", 5.5oz
    20GB iPod: 4.1 by 2.4 by 0.62 inches, 5.6oz

    I have a digital camera that's 1.3" thick, and that's pretty thick for a pants pocket - it's really prominent. 1.1" is probably similarly brickish. YMMV. A jacket pocket would probably be fine, though.

    My advice for portable audio gizmo shoppers: make sure you actually see the products in person and that you get to handle it & play with the UI (i.e. not some broken demo model that doesn't turn on) before you buy it... don't just buy one based on a feature matrix. It could have a crappy UI, or be flimsy, or have a crappy screen, or weigh a ton, etc. etc.

  212. Re:OGG? What is that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OGG is lossy.

    No it isn't. Ogg is a container format. You may be referring to Vorbis or Speex, two codecs commonly used with Ogg. FLAC is also used with Ogg, so "Ogg is lossy" not only doesn't make sense, but can be the exact opposite of the truth. I have thousands of non-lossy Ogg files.

  213. Re:OGG? What is that about? by xpyr · · Score: 1

    Yeah well when ogg first was around, the mp3 players couldn't play it right because it needed a more powerful processor. It went down something like this. Cost of mp3 player plus licensing for mp3 codec was LESS then cost of mp3 player plus hardware needed for ogg support. So then the only reason for using ogg was that it was open source and stuff.