Slashdot Mirror


Preempting Hailstone Formation To Protect Cars

Makarand writes "Nissan has become the first automaker in the United States to start using a device that suppresses hail formation to protect its fleet of new vehicles from hailstorm damage. The device is a cannon capable of shooting sonic waves upto 50,000 feet in the air to keep hailstones from forming. The device comes with its own weather radar and activates when it detects conditions favorable for hail formation. The device can provide hailstorm protection in an area with one-mile radius by firing sonic waves every five seconds."

393 comments

  1. Sonic cannons are useless technology by fo0bar · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is not mentioned in the article is that this sonic cannon was sold to Nissan by Toyota, who knew that the technology is useless against the latest fleet of Goa'uld motherships.

    1. Re:Sonic cannons are useless technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they are very useful when the Goa'uld motherships enter the atmosphere. Toyota just forgot to mention that they don't.

    2. Re:Sonic cannons are useless technology by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Shit, we're screwed

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    3. Re:Sonic cannons are useless technology by AJWM · · Score: 1

      ROFL! I just watched that episode (on DVD) last night.

      --
      -- Alastair
  2. April in February by trolman · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  3. hmmm by zojakownith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they just need sharks with frikkin' radar beams.

    --
    I have bad karma....

    Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Making quotation mark gesture with hands* "LASER"

    2. Re:hmmm by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Now they just need sharks with frikkin' radar beams.

      If you're going to mangle the quote, at least realize that sharks would need frikkin' sonar devices.

  4. sound fishy to me by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud, which for one probably buffers the sound. Also, is 120 db really that loud compared to the localized sound from a single lightning strike?

    Sounds to me like these guys got taken. It's pretty hard to prove that you prevented hail, just as it is hard to prove that you created rain.

    1. Re:sound fishy to me by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think it has to do anything to the thundercloud. If I remember right, hailstones form as the water falls from the could, not inside the cloud itself.

      I'm assuming that the sonic pulse is supposed to somehow agitate the falling water to keep it from forming large ice crystals so they melt once they get to the lower (and warmer) atmosphere. Or something like that. I'm too lazy to read too deeply into the company's website.

      Either way, they claim a 100% success rate, and if Nissan is willing to buy them I imagine that they have evidence to back it up. It doesn't seem that it would be impossible to prove the product works - most hailstorms are larger than the 0.3 mile radius effective range they claim. If you can repeatedly show hailstorms with a small hail-free patch surrounding the device, I'd say there's significant evidence that this isn't just a bunch of baloney.

    2. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You obviously aren't a farmer. And as for proving it works my crops are standing and the ones on the farm next door are torn to shreads.

    3. Re:sound fishy to me by futuramarama · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if thats 120 db of any Britney song, its bound to have the hail running for the hills.

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
    4. Re:sound fishy to me by kinnell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud, which for one probably buffers the sound

      120db is the sound measured on the ground next to the device. The sound is almost certainly focused upwards, which means it will be significantly louder above the device. As for the cloud absorbing the sound, well that's how it works.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    5. Re:sound fishy to me by GuidoDEV · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hailstones form inside the thundercloud, and grow larger as they are suspended by the thunderstorm's updraft or recycled through it. Clear ice in a hailstone corresponds to growth in warmer regions of the cloud where the water has time to flow before freezing, cloudy ice corresponds to ice formation in colder regions of the cloud where the water freezes on contact.

    6. Re:sound fishy to me by b4k4 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If I remember right, hailstones form as the water falls from the could, not inside the cloud itself.

      Hail forms when a raindrop freezes inside a cloud, but shoots back up (due to massive updrafts), and falls back down, gaining more layers of frozen rain/ice. It continues this cycle until the ball of ice is too heavy to be lifted by the updrafts, at which point it falls to the ground as hail.

    7. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hailstones form by repeated trips vertically inside the stormcloud, to the top for freezing, and to the lower levels for a successive coating of water.

      rinse+repeat

    8. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, if it kills enough birds then their pulverized bodies will protect the cars. When the hail stops all you have to do is brush off the carcasses.

    9. Re:sound fishy to me by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better explanation of the process can be read here.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    10. Re:sound fishy to me by Alioth · · Score: 1

      I'm skeptical that it will work - hailstones are formed by large up-and-down motions of the raindrops. The water that eventually becomes hail has gone up to around 50K feet in a large thunderstorm. The forces they are trying to combat in a T-storm are simply enormous - we had a guy from the NWS come to our flying club to talk about thunderstorms, and they said that a typical large T-storm releases about the same amount of energy as multi-kiloton nuclear weapon (over a much longer period of time of course, hence civilization doesn't get blown to bits every time a squall line comes through!)

    11. Re:sound fishy to me by LennyDotCom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud

      When I spent my summers as a kid in italy on the farm when ever it looked like hail I would hear a booming sound like cannons. My mother told me it was the cannons that they fired into the clouds to stop the hail from knocking the grapes off the vines.

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    12. Re:sound fishy to me by rcw-home · · Score: 1
      thundercloud [...] probably buffers the sound.

      How do foghorns work then?

    13. Re:sound fishy to me by swschrad · · Score: 1

      no, the 120 dB shock every 5 seconds will make everybody around the plant so goofy that they won't notice (or care) if pots of gold were bouncing off the roofs of those cars.

      there is a second use for the gutshakers... come the economic decline, they can turn 'em around and use 'em to blow surplus employees out of the plant.

      sell 'em to airports to divert incoming geese from the engine nacelles. a goose up your Pratt & Whitney can ruin your whole day.

      --
      if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
    14. Re:sound fishy to me by phaggood · · Score: 0

      How do foghorns work then?

      Low frequencies dig thick mediums.
      Elephant sound

    15. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many bats and dogs will this screw up, being a sonic frequency and such??

    16. Re:sound fishy to me by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fish?

      It's the BIRDS that you'll be smelling...

      The ones that aren't killed, will surely dump a load on the roadway.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    17. Re:sound fishy to me by donutz · · Score: 1

      When I spent my summers as a kid in italy on the farm when ever it looked like hail I would hear a booming sound like cannons. My mother told me it was the cannons that they fired into the clouds to stop the hail from knocking the grapes off the vines.

      Maybe you were hearing thunder?

    18. Re:sound fishy to me by DeionXxX · · Score: 1

      What exactly did they fire out of those cannons?

      --D3X

    19. Re:sound fishy to me by tenchima · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grapes

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
    20. Re:sound fishy to me by bobbabemagnet · · Score: 1

      And where, exactly, did whatever it was that was fired land?

    21. Re:sound fishy to me by barakn · · Score: 1

      One may find numerous references on the 'net to nearby (presumably not near enough to kill you) lightning as being 120 db. Since the cannon is well below the cloud deck, the strength of its sound will be much smaller than 120 db in the cloud, and thus will be far softer than the sound from lightning, especially considering the device acts like a point source of sound while the lightning is a linear source. If the sound-disruption-of-hail theory is correct, then storms with lightning have no hail. I'd have to agree, this device is a scam.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    22. Re:sound fishy to me by el_gregorio · · Score: 1
      yeah, right.

      and my cell phone prevents earthquakes. the proof? well, you don't feel any earthquakes right now, do you?

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
    23. Re:sound fishy to me by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      I doubt clouds buffer sound much. (Foam doesn't, either, btw. It damps vibrations and reflections but doesn't prevent transmission.)

      Mass buffers sound. Clouds have relatively little mass - in an example in Scientific American, a cloud might have 1g of water per cubic meter.

    24. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... what do you mean 'sonic frequency'?

      I thought slashdotters were pretty stupid and obnoxious, but you take the cake.

    25. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an idiot?

      The article AND the slashdot summary both tell you it fires every five seconds or so. Lightning doesn't do that, or it'd blow your fucking house apart.

    26. Re:sound fishy to me by Imperator · · Score: 1

      But now that you've grown up, you realize that was just thunder, right? Right?

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
    27. Re:sound fishy to me by Pisco · · Score: 1

      Some supporting information: http://members.aol.com/gilcopub/tbit-6.html

    28. Re:sound fishy to me by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Yup. More to the point, I believe the term the parent poster was looking for was "snow".

      If memory serves, when water freezes in a cloud and keeps getting lifted by updrafts, allowing it to accumulate significant mass, that's hail. When water freezes as it falls from the clouds, that's snow. When snow partially melts and (partially or fully) refreezes in a cold air layer near the ground, that's sleet. When snow fully melts and (partially or fully) refreezes, that's freezing rain. Similarly when rain falls and freezes in a cold air region near the ground, also freezing rain.

      Anyway....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    29. Re:sound fishy to me by holt · · Score: 1

      Weather is weird, though. Last summer some of the neighboring farms had some extreme wind damage due to a strong storm. (Actually a tornado touched down about a half-mile from my house. I didn't know anything about it until the next morning when I was driving to work, and saw the damage in the cornfield.) Anyway, our farms were hardly damaged at all.

      It wasn't just us, either. This same type of this happened all over the area - one field would be heavily damaged while the neighbor's field across the road would be mostly fine.

      So while I'm not doubting that your fields are fine and the neighbor's are torn to shreds, there is still no proof that it is due to the anti-hail machine.

    30. Re:sound fishy to me by slamb · · Score: 1
      LennyDotCom said: When I spent my summers as a kid in italy on the farm when ever it looked like hail I would hear a booming sound like cannons. My mother told me it was the cannons that they fired into the clouds to stop the hail from knocking the grapes off the vines.

      Pisco linked to an article (part 1 / part 2) that said:

      His skepticism was well founded. Widespread damaging hailstorms raked regions of Austria, France, and Italy between 1902 and 1904. Vine growers protected by cannons were pounded mercilessly. By 1905, in a sudden turnaround, many disgusted vineyard owners had gotten rid of their hail cannons.

      These absurd-looking devices fell into the dustbin of history, but not so for the tantalizing concept of weather modification. Cloud seeding and hail modification have preoccupied meteorologists in the years since then, but again, with largely unproven effects.

      What's your secret to longevity? Are you a vampire?

    31. Re:sound fishy to me by barakn · · Score: 1
      Hmmmm... Considering that not all lightning hits the ground (cloud to cloud lightning puts the source of the sound in the cloud itself), that lightning is a linear rather than point source of sound, that each bolt may contain hundreds or thousands of times the energy of a single cannon blast, that neither lightning nor hail can occur until ice starts to form in the storm, that the lightning moves with the cloud instead of remaining at a fixed geographic point like the cannon, and that what appears to be a single bolt to you is actually a series of repeat strokes that all use the same trunk to reach the ground but each of which branches from and discharges a different pocket of charge in the cloud, a thunderstorm could have less than one bolt every five seconds but be more effective than the cannon firing at one every five.

      Even a dimwit AC should have the common sense to realize a thunderstorm is going to provide more of its own noise than some ridiculous little cannon firing briefly underneath it. But AC might be excused for defending that ridiculous position if (s)he is a Nissan exec..

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    32. Re:sound fishy to me by DesertFalcon · · Score: 1

      Freezing rain is what you get when it falls as a liquid, but then freezes as soon as it touches something. I'm not sure how it happens but it makes for terrible driving conditions and usually pulls down some power lines and/or tree branches.

      --
      --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
  5. Won't that be dangerous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for passing airliners?

    50,000ft is a lot higher than most commercial airliners fly at.

    Sonic cannons that can shoot down hailstones? Sounds very cool, but do we really need that in a car anyway?

    1. Re:Won't that be dangerous... by DJPenguin · · Score: 1

      In a car? I think not. Read the article - they are talking about one device to protect a whole fleet of new cars out in the open...

    2. Re:Won't that be dangerous... by Polkyb · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nissan don't have them fitted to cars yet

      Your thinking of a Volkswagon Golf

      :-)

      --
      I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  6. In other news... by andih8u · · Score: 4, Funny

    They found the device to be effective against hail, but couldn't figure out the recent surge in bat dropping related damage.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:In other news... by steve_l · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is funny.

      In the book 'the skunk works', one of the pilots in the stealth fighters in the first Bush gulf war describes how before the war began they used to go to their hangars in the morning and find the planes surrounded by dead bats.

      There were a lot of bats in the area, and the design of the fighters meant they not only didnt reflect radar, they didnt reflect sound. So these bats would be swooping around what sounded like an empty hangar, when suddenly they'd run into an invisible force field that would injure or kill them...

    2. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Haha that is so funny. Innocent, and presumably rare and protected animals, are suffering and dying.

      Asshole.

    3. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont make me chuck u into a windmill buddy..

    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DARWINNED!

      18...19...20

    5. Re:In other news... by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1

      You bring up a great point though, will this mess around with birds and bats? A question for the physics inclined Slashdot crowd, will all of the wave be absorbed by the cloud or will any be bounced?

      --
      Sig it.
    6. Re:In other news... by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      You think bats are rare? Where do you live? Please name an animal that isn't "innocent". I'm telling you that it was those animals at Enron that did it and they're guilty as hell.

    7. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      But since F-117s operate at night, they would be taking off at dusk, be in the air at night and return to base at dawn. Wouldn't that suggest that the planes were gone while the bats were coming and going?
      Also, I'd imagine hangar doors are kept closed most of the time when occupied by (at the time) a highly classified aircraft.
      Not to mention that radar waves are a much higher frequency than sound waves, sound waves would reflect differently than EM waves do.

    8. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story of "dead bats" in fact has nothing to do with the F-117A's "stealthy" properties. Bats use ultrasonic signals for echolocation: these are mechanical compression waves not electromagnetic waves, as in case with radars, and have certainly nothing to do with the radar absorbent paint or any geometrical properties of the F-117A. The ultrasonic signals emitted by bats are narrow and highly directional and will reflect from most surfaces, RAM or no RAM. To explain the "dead bats" phenomenon we only need to remember that the F-117As use highly toxic paint and that the aircraft were stored in hot hangars with restricted ventilation. If the maintenance crews have spent as much time in these hangars as bats did, the bodies of bats would not have been the only dead bodies found around F-117As.

  7. Actually... by Lshmael · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ..it is mentioned:
    They won't say what it cost, but admit they won't really know if it works until there is a hail storm over the plant.
    1. Re:Actually... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Damn...wondering if I can take up a neighborhood collection to get one of these!! In New Orleans, land is at a premium, and most of us do not have garages or covered parking, and when a hail storm hits....it is bad. Hell, I'd think the insurance companies might want to put some of these things up to save themselves a city full of claims....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Actually... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      At 120db at ground zero, you probably do not want to use one of these to protect a neighbourhood. Maybe if you park your vehicles 20 miles away from the city...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    3. Re:Actually... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn...wondering if I can take up a neighborhood collection to get one of these!!

      Forget hail; imagine opeating this horizontally! Take out the neighborhood, open up some scenic views.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  8. Sweet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When can I pick one up..

  9. Link to the probable manufacturer... by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Sponge!
    1. Re:Link to the probable manufacturer... by phayes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the linked site, they "include a waranty, providing indemnity for losses and damages to assets in case that the Ollivier Hail Suppression System(R) does not function properly".

      In other words, you're replacing your insurance policies with their warranty. Depending on the reliability of their financial resources & how much these sound cannons cost, this could actually save money for Nissan even if it doesn't work (as I assume).

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  10. Knight Rider by FePe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It reminds me of Knight Rider.

    --
    "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
  11. They forgot to mention the downside... by crayz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...instead of having hail fall on your car, 747s do.

    1. Re:They forgot to mention the downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sod the 747s, they can look after themselves, but what does it do to me in my spamcan?

    2. Re:They forgot to mention the downside... by Alsee · · Score: 0, Troll

      I wonder if they had one of thses things to protect the Twin Towers from hail?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. Altering Weather... Great! by aerojad · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'd personally like to thank Nissan for coming up with yet another way to fck up the natural processes on this planet. Hate to infringe upon Nissan's bottom line but hail, like all weather, happens for a reason.

    Maybe next Cadillac will come out with a devise that will make sure within a one mile radius the sky is always clear at night, so people can enjoy their moonroofs.

    Precip. patterns? Things that need water to live? Bah!

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
    1. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by andih8u · · Score: 3, Informative

      How would breaking it down from hail into say small ice crystals mess up the planet?

      --


      slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    2. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Bastian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This wouldn't stop precipitation from happening, it's supposed to just stop the precipitation from forming hailstones. You'd get rain instead.

      I doubt it's going to become much of a problem, either. With these things generating a 120db noise every 5 seconds, you're not going to see too many of them in populated areas - as the article says, they're mostly used by farmers to protect their fields.

      That said, I'm really curious if it even works.

    3. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by shepd · · Score: 2, Troll

      >I'd personally like to thank Nissan for coming up with yet another way to fck up the natural processes on this planet.

      Natural, like a bearded pope, or pedophilia?

      Sorry to break it to you, but daily we change natural processes on this planet. Chaging hail to snow or water sounds like a great idea to me.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by t0qer · · Score: 5, Funny

      That said, I'm really curious if it even works.

      Of course it works!! Here's a little fun with science you can make yourself that proves how this works.

      What you need:
      1 peice of paper.
      1 speaker, connected to a stereo.
      some music.

      Start by ripping the paper into little shreds and balling them up into tiny little balls. Next, take all the little balls and mash them together into one big ball.

      Now if you have decent speakers you can just set the paperball mass on top of the cabinet. For those wussy computer speakers, I recomend turning it on it's side and placing the ball directly in the cone.

      Now crank up your volume and watch what happens to those little balls. They start dancing around and the bigger ball falls apart! See! Now imagine that on a smaller scale, say ice crystal size. That is exactly what is happening to the hail when it gets sonically blasted.

    5. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoops, modded wrong comment. Now, to unmoderate by posting in the thread.....

    6. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you some kind of idiot?

    7. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is this kind of geleralization that makes for great crackpot science. Just because it works for paper on top of a speaker, doesn't mean it will work on ice crystals at high altitude.

      your proof is a non-proof.

    8. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by PhuCknuT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are altering weather over a tiny area probably only 1/4 square mile, and only during hailstorms. And they aren't stopping the precipitation, they are only stopping the hailstone formation. I'd like to hear a single reason, other than noise polution, that this is bad.

      If anything, this is good for the environment, as it reduces the number of cars destroyed every year by hail, therefore reducing needless manufacturing of replacement parts and reducing the amount ending up as scrap metal.

      Besides, just because something 'happens for a reason' doesn't mean it's good for the environment. Meteors hit earth for a reason (their orbits cross earth's at a bad time), that doesn't mean they are a good thing. Hail isn't a good thing, it's not like nature 'evolved' hail to fill some need, it's just something that happens when you mix cold and thunderstorms.

    9. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 0
      They are altering weather over a tiny area probably only 1/4 square mile

      Have you not heard of chaos theory? The "butterfly effect"?

      Hail isn't a good thing

      Sure it is. Some of us enjoy hail. Interesting weather is beautiful! What the fsck gives them the right to deny it to us because we might live close to a Nissan dealership? (And to send noise pollution out in a five-mile radius?)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your expiriment is like melting a plastic orange (you know, the inedible, only-for-display ones) to determine what happens to a real orange under application of heat.

    11. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What. the. fuck. is geleralization?

    12. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      He meant generalization.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    13. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      I wonder what this will do to low flying aircraft...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      My guess would be nothing. Besides, what would a plane be doing flying through a hailstorm?

    15. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      In the plains states, thunderstorms can deposit hail many miles away from a thunderhead. It can be a bright sunny day - and hail falling from the sky.

      Pilots, many times, don't have a choice about flying through certain weather conditions that occur unexpectedly - particularly if they are under instrument flight rules. While the FAA is very good about routing around storms, there is always that opportunity for a mistake, or micro-weather activity in a confined area.

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    16. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put a (real) orange into a microwave for half an hour once until it
      caught fire. Made a hell of a lot of smoke and smelled TERRIBLE.

  13. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is common practice around my area (Christchurch, New Zealand) to protect pip fruit and grape crops from hail damage. I'm frankly surprised this is news.

    1. Re:News? by FePe · · Score: 1
      The article itself states that isn't news:

      "There aremore than 400 such machines in operation in the world, and this is the ninth one installed in the United States. They are made in Canada and are used primarily to protect crops."

      --
      "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
    2. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot : Yesterday's news... Tomorrow!

    3. Re:News? by nettdata · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's interesting... I'm in Canada, and my Dad was born/raised on a farm, and yet I'd never even heard of the concept, never mind the actual implementation of this.

      I've actually found it to be one of the more interesting articles on ./ in a while.

      Can you hear the things from where you are? Do they have much of an impact/annoyance-factor for people living in the surrounding areas?

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    4. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean;

      "Slashdot : Yesterday's news... Tomorrow! ....and then repeated the day after that...

    5. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one used by Daimler Chrysler at their Mercedes factory in Germany has actually increased the yields at nearby wineries. Though why we would want more German wine I'm not sure.

    6. Re:News? by alek202 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      slashdot is about stories, not about news. Even if you might have hard about this, others might not - and that's the good thing about slashdot.

      --
      Every problem has a solution, but every solution creates new problems.
    7. Re:News? by DutchSter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember when I was taking my intro to weather classes, we discussed such a device. The Russians used to try something similar in an attempt to break up thunderstorms. The idea was basically the same, just shoot something up into the cloud and disturb its ability to hail. Problems with this device fell into three major categories:

      1) Didn't work at all.
      2) When it did work, all it did was move the storm out of range of the device. Once out of range, the cloud would dump twice as much on the unprotected area. This gets really political when farmer John is flooding farmer Bill's field two miles down the road.
      3) Lots of dead wildlife (birds).

    8. Re:News? by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      slashdot is about stories, not about news.

      Is that why the tagline reads, "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters."?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    9. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Lots of dead wildlife (birds).

      I'm gonna call bullshit on that. When I lived on the farm (many years ago when weather forecasts weren't as accurate), the best indicator of storms moving in was when the birds all went to roost.

    10. Re:News? by visgoth · · Score: 1

      This article falls under the "Stuff that matters" column. If the tagline for /. was "News about stuff that matters to nerds" then this article would be unsuitable for this site, as it is not news.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    11. Re:News? by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      ""2) When it did work, all it did was move the storm out of range of the device. Once out of range, the cloud would dump twice as much on the unprotected area. This gets really political when farmer John is flooding farmer Bill's field two miles down the road.""

      That's enough for Nissan and their precious cars, I assume...

    12. Re:News? by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      Can you hear the things from where you are

      No, but I'm at least a good thousand miles away. Maybe if they turn it up to 11.

    13. Re:News? by Shalda · · Score: 1

      The govenerment's Weather Contorl Satelites(tm) have had this capability since 1973, as well as the technology to create hail. Please try to keep up with contemporary conspiracy theory.

    14. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live by an apple orchard in SE Ohio which uses one of these hail cannons.
      "Cannon" is an apt moniker for the device as this is exactly how it sounds.
      I'm about 2 miles from its location. At this distance, its "boom" is still quite loud. Scares some of the dogs in my neighborhood.

    15. Re:News? by tazanator · · Score: 1

      well is 2 miles downwind the toyota plant? I know the saturn plant is north- east but by more than 2 miles ...

      --
      I'm told you are what you eat, does that mean I can be you by tomorrow with some A1?
    16. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weather Contorl Satelites(tm)

      THAT's why I couldn't find them in my google search, I was using the correctly spelled version! Those tricky feds, what will they think of next!

    17. Re:News? by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

      Nah... That's not the problem. They just need to make it stronger - Tim Taylor should build one of these... I'd bet it'd dissipate a tornado.

      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    18. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - what you hear are gas powered cannons to scare off birds - not bloody hail.

      Arrrgh. Go live on a farm or orchard some time - maybe even talk to a farmer.

  14. as proof by Barbarian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Let me post this (ganked from another site):
    [blockquote]Basically, the anti-hail cannon uses
    acetylene to shoot cations into the
    atmosphere at sonic speed, which creates
    shock waves that interfere with the
    crystallization of ice, thereby resulting in
    rain or sheet, but not hail. It covers a
    circular area of about 0.3 mile radius,
    roughly 200 acres.[/blockquote]
    This sounds like a bunch of baloney to me. "Shoots cations" is as ridiculous as when you hear hippies talking about "bad ions" and "good ions" with respect to some stupid lava lamp.

    1. Re:as proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      right. because you know more about the field from your cursory search than the people who researched it and the people who spent millions of dollars to install it.

      skepticism is fine, you just have to use more proof than "this sounds like a bunch of baloney". cations are real you know.

    2. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Shoots cations" is as ridiculous as when you hear hippies talking about "bad ions" and "good ions" with respect to some stupid lava lamp.

      Ah, but unlike 'good ions', cation has a proper scientific meaning. Cations are simply positively charged ions. As they're charged they're fairly easy to direct using magnetic fields and *waves hands* what-not. An example is a helium nucleus, which has a charge of +2, also known as alpha-radiation. So, some smoke detectors work by 'shooting cations' across a small gap.

      Of course, the problem with this is that alpha-radiation is stopped by a few centimetres of air, and larger particles are probably even less effective. I've no idea if they actually 'shoot cations' thousands of feet into the air or not - it seems more likely that a large charge would propagate through the air, without any individual particle travelling very far, if they could produce enough of a potential difference.

      I wouldn't say it's baloney but it does sound somewhat exaggerated.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    3. Re:as proof by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Given that large hail requires the presence of a thunderstorm and its associated intense electromagnetic fields and proliferation of ions (whether positively or negatively charged), using ions to prevent hail seems like an exercise in futility at best.

    4. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmmm. Hang on - lightning occurs when there is a great potential difference between the cloud and the earth, right? So as the cloud is getting ready to shoot negatively-charged particles downwards could you shoot positively-charged ions upwards?

      To answer my own question, I think there'd be a great risk of triggering a lightning strike by doing this, so you're probably right :)

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    5. Re:as proof by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, almost every household equipment in Japan is sold with the tag "minus ion". [mai-nas ee-on] I had never heard of minus ions doing anything interesting as regards your house, until I got here. Seems that they are supposed to be good for your health (as everyone except me obviously knows).

    6. Re:as proof by GuidoDEV · · Score: 4, Informative

      The electromagnetic forces inside a thunderstorm are mind-bogglingly intense because of the fact that air is such a great insulator, so shooting ions more than a few meters into the air, let alone into the bowels of a storm, is not something that sounds at all feasible to me. I suppose it might be possible to induce a lightning strike as the ions build up near the unit (whether actively through intervention or passively through natural forces is probably a matter of debate), but then as soon as it gets hit its "usefulness" will quickly come to an end anyway.

      As an aside, lightning is generally believed to occur due to charge separation inside the storm due to cloud microphysics, with positive charge accumulating near the ground, possibly partly due to friction from rain. What actually triggers the lightning strike is unknown, though one theory that has recently been gaining some traction proposes that cosmic rays cause a sudden breakdown in the electrical resistance of air which rapidly snowballs (over the course of a fraction of a second), allowing lightning to occur. Obviously things are a bit more complicated than that, but it's way O/T to get into the nitty-gritty details, which I'm not overly familiar with anyway since I haven't read the papers detailing said theory.

    7. Re:as proof by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Based on that quote, it doesn't sound like they are trying to shoot cations into the cloud itself, just using the cations being "shot" as the sound source, instead of the more traditional magnetic and paper cone (which may not be fea$ible for 120dB and the other characteristics, such as extreme focus, they're looking for in the sound).

      The cations themselves may only make it inches but the sound they make can easily propogate for a mile if the sound is directed and has a strength of 120dB.

    8. Re:as proof by Fembot · · Score: 1

      right. becaause where there is money involved people can automaticaly be trusted?

    9. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This irritated me so much I looked it up. From HailShield.com:

      The HAIL SHIELD generator, provides a shock wave that is projected toward the hail baring cloud with a 4000 lb. thrust. The waves are successive, a shot is fired every 5 1/4 seconds, and creates a new 'shock wave' each time. These waves grow in diameter, and spread out to cover one kilometer in diameter immediately above the generator. As the generator heats up, it allows the shock wave, 'torre', to pick up positive ions, and carry them up into the cloud. These positive ions help destabilize the hail formation. The cloud becomes homogenized, and can no longer produce hail while in the shock zone. The shock wave can be seen in the early morning, or in late afternoon. It looks like a heat mirage, that we see on hot surfaces. The shock wave also has a very definite sound. After a cannon shot, or bang, you will hear a very high-pitched whistling type sound, leaving the mouth of the generator. This is the shock wave. The shock wave has been detected as high as 50,000 feet.

      and

      The generator works exactly like a shot gun. When it is fired, it gives a two ton thrust at the area of most resistance, the butt. The two tons of thrust can not pass through the butt, so the thrust reverses, and goes out through the barrel. This is the 'BOOM' that we hear. When the explosive force goes upward, it creates a vacuum, that opens the two check valves that are built into the butt. These check valves open and draw air into the generator. This air follows the explosive thrust at super sonic speeds. When directed by the barrel, this air becomes the 'Shock Wave', that you can see and hear a few seconds after the initial 'BOOM'. This is repeated every five and quarter seconds.

      So there we have it. They do move cations into the atmosphere, but they don't shoot them out of the cannon.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    10. Re:as proof by hraefn · · Score: 2, Funny

      thereby resulting in
      rain or sheet


      Greeeaat... sheet falling from thee sky... Nissan has gone loco!

    11. Re:as proof by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, it was the U.S. Navy that first noticed that a negative charge on the air has positive effects on crew health and morale. This was observed in submerged nuclear subs where external environment effects are well controlled due to being submerged for long periods.

      It is thought that the morale destroying effects of 'the doldrums' reported historically are in part caused by the generally positive charge on the air. That's much harder to prove sine it could also be the general lack of wind (and thus progress on the voyage).

    12. Re:as proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, mods! It's funny, Laugh!

    13. Re:as proof by geekpaddr · · Score: 1
      The generator works exactly like a shot gun. When it is fired, it gives a two ton thrust at the area of most resistance, the butt.

      Guess I have something in common with this contraption- the butt is my area of maximum resistance also...
      -DaveR

    14. Re:as proof by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

      "That's much harder to prove sine it could also be the general lack of wind"

      It could be the general lack of chicken soft tacos and carne asada too.

    15. Re:as proof by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > It could be the general lack of chicken soft tacos and carne asada too.

      Y'know, that really doesn't seem like it should be funny, but I was chuckling anyway. Thanks :)

    16. Re:as proof by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of an old children's rhyme.

      Birdie, birdie in the sky,
      He drop whitewash in my eye.
      Me no worry, me no cry...
      Me just clat that cows don't fly.

      :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:as proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure cations can ride a shock wave?
      Is it like lighning bolts surfing on wind?

      I'm a soil/water chemist, so I'm not an expert,
      but this sure sounds like garbage to me.

    18. Re:as proof by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's nothing like a serious case of wind to get people laughing when there's nothing to do for days at a time :-)

    19. Re:as proof by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can't take anyone seriously that has a site like that. Their "diagram" of the device looks like it was drawn by a 5 year old. I mean, come on. Nobody is going to take you seriously with crap like that.

      (No offense to any 5 year olds that may be reading.)

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  15. An early version of the device by marcopo · · Score: 5, Funny

    was known as a roof.

    1. Re:An early version of the device by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      Just that roof tiles tend to break if you apply large enough hailstones to them. So you can even profit from that if you have a roof (assuming it really works).

    2. Re:An early version of the device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that roofing over a 140 acres of car lot would be just a bit expensive. And it's even more impractical for the situation for which the device was originally designed, protecting crops.

    3. Re:An early version of the device by lewp · · Score: 2, Funny

      All my crops have a roof over them ;).

      (Don't NARC on my stash)

      --
      Game... blouses.
    4. Re:An early version of the device by Myglaren · · Score: 1

      It was reported recently (Top Gear, BBC TV) that Mercedes had constructed a huge roof over their parking areas for newly produced stock.

    5. Re:An early version of the device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a lot less roof if you build vertical -- think parking garage. Dealerships in our area do this.

  16. Worse than hail by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure it will protect cars from hail, but what about all the falling pigeons?

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    1. Re:Worse than hail by mattjb0010 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's where TCP steps in, to guarantee reliable transmission over IP :)

    2. Re:Worse than hail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it will protect cars from hail, but what about all the falling pigeons?

      It simply means the Nissan employees will eat well tonight.

    3. Re:Worse than hail by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 1

      every car comes with a free "chicken" dinner.

  17. I thought it went on your car by ReciprocityProject · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When I first read this, I thought it was a little device that went on the roof of your car and disrupted hail. That would have been soooo cool.

    1. Re:I thought it went on your car by DeltaZulu0 · · Score: 1

      I'd love to have one of these on my car. I've been looking for a way to retaliate against those folks who think their trunk is for the woofer. I'd love to see the look on their faces after their windows get blown out ;)

    2. Re:I thought it went on your car by shepd · · Score: 1

      >I'd love to see the look on their faces after their windows get blown out ;)

      "Woah!"

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:I thought it went on your car by Colonel+Panijk · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see the look on their faces after their windows get blown out ;)

      Easy. Just fire up your Linux box...

  18. Home Run for Timothy! by robbyjo · · Score: 1, Funny

    In related news, Timothy has posted 10 latest news consecutively! Yay Timothy! :) I think you have the device that surpresses Taco from posting ;)

    --

    --
    Error 500: Internal sig error
  19. Environmental Impact? by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any idea what the environmental impact is from these things?

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Environmental Impact? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any idea what the environmental impact is from these things?

      What's that you say? I can't hear you!

    2. Re:Environmental Impact? by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... Sonic waves? Scare birds, maybe?... If it does, I want one of those things... My car gets bombed too often.

    3. Re:Environmental Impact? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly, can you change the weather just because you own the land under it? I don't think there are any laws dealing with these things, but then IANAL.

      --
      Martin
    4. Re:Environmental Impact? by PsionicMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. It will interfere with hailstone formation. Next question?

      --

    5. Re:Environmental Impact? by Mork29 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um, most likely nothing. Many things in nature create more and louder noises... some in the sky... um... lightning? er, thunder... You know. Not to mention the noise polution humans already create. Cars, planes, American Idol. One little cannon making noise during thunderstorms which are already loud really shouldn't affect anything.

    6. Re:Environmental Impact? by 2bot_or_not_2bot · · Score: 1


      ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: Less hail.

      Will there be a "Save the Hails" bumper sticker?

    7. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Any idea what the environmental impact is from these things?

      It might have effects on airborn creatures that are similar to the effects on water dwellers that Navy sonar appears to be having, or it might not.

      Sadly, no one has any idea what the effects will be on animal and insect populations, if any. If in fact serious damage is being done, there will be enough people willing to work to deny that there are any environmental problems, as has happened with virtually all other approaches to economic problems that wound up having serious environmental consequences.

    8. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if anyone reads IANAL and reads "I am not a lawyer" or if like me you just read "I anal", but seriously, it has to be the worst acronym ever. I'm just glad I finish my law degree at the end of this year and don't have to worry about it anymore....

    9. Re:Environmental Impact? by Ubi_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then how come those US submarines are capable of beaching and killing a few hundred wales everytime they try out their new sonar system?

      Seriously. This thing makes noises in a way yet unprecedented. It may very well interfere with bird flight routes or many other things. Just sucking your thumb is no way to dismiss a possible enironmental impact.

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    10. Re:Environmental Impact? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      This isn't truly changing weather. This is more on the order of ameliorating a bad weather side effect. The moisture still comes down to earth, but it does so in a less destructive fashion.

    11. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lightning doesn't cause thunder underwater you stupid dick. By the same token using a big noise making machine several thousand miles inland won't cause whales to beach either.

      Jesus.

    12. Re:Environmental Impact? by Wanderer2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Water is a much better medium than air for propagating sound. That's why the whales get driven mad by certain sonar systems. The effects of these hail-preventers would be localised.

      I'd be interested to know what the effects on local birds are, although I'd imagine they don't hang around underneath a cloud that's about to lash down golf-ball sized hail...

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    13. Re:Environmental Impact? by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Then how come those US submarines are capable of beaching and killing a few hundred wales everytime they try out their new sonar system?
      Because the US submarine sonar system you refer to, works
      • in water, not air.
      • at a much higher output level, over 200dB IIRC -- not 120dB which is about the noise which your local discotheque will happily torture you with.
      • works infrasonic
      In other words: How many whales have been killed so far by the sound of starting/landing airplanes? Or beach discotheques?

      Same goes for the pidgeon question, btw. They'll have a harder time finding themselves getting sucked into jet engines rather than feeling the effect of some distant 120dB sound.

    14. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the fact that "nature" decided this area need hail (water) and now it doesn't get it? There is more to the eco system than noise pollution.

    15. Re:Environmental Impact? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      If they beach and kill a few hundred countries then im worried. I really hope you meant Whales :)

    16. Re:Environmental Impact? by TheScogg · · Score: 1

      In Terrorist Iraq, cars bomb you!

    17. Re:Environmental Impact? by danheskett · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What he meant to ask was:

      "Any environmental impact that I can use against the manufacturer to force him/her to stop selling these products? Any rare bird, rare plant, rare protected type of anything that is damaged? Does this increase the likelihood that migratory birds will fail to migrate or that hibernating bears will cease to hibernate? Is there any rational or irrational basis for me, an environmentalist, to hate, despise, villify, or otherwise malign this product? "

      Read between the lines sometimes.

    18. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why to perhaps recognise humor?

    19. Re:Environmental Impact? by BlackHawk · · Score: 1

      "One little cannon". You're funny.

      How about 2? 5? 10? 15? I've driven through Chicago, for example, and in one of the southwestern 'burbs is an automall that covers acres. There are at least 20 dealerships there. How about if they all install this system? Remember, one system can be heard five miles away, and upon activation it starts firing every 5.5 seconds.

      "Can't happen," you say? "There's no need to plant 20 of these in one spot," you point out? I reply with one word: insurance. If the insurance companies covering these dealerships get the idea that the system reduces damage, they might start offering incentives to install one, in an effort to reduce their costs of covering a dealership. Then you will see multiple units installed in a given area.

      If one unit can be heard 5 miles away, how loud will 10 be?

      --

      Believe nothing, not even if I say it, if it violates your sense of reason -- Buddha

    20. Re:Environmental Impact? by Theatetus · · Score: 1

      Ha ha.

      But seriously, supposing this thing works, what would the larger impact be? We still can't do tests on the impact of something on an ecosystem because we don't have sophisticated enough modeling.

      Do we know this wouldn't kill birds? Fuck up weather patterns? Cause some disease? No, but that won't stop some jackass from using it because he doesn't want his precious car dented.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    21. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference between man-made sonic anti-hail guns and any comparable naturally-occuring loud noise such as thunder is that wild animal life cannot predict the former, and will be affected in unknown and possibly adverse ways, but tends to be cognizant of the latter, and takes action well suited for survival.

      For example, birds appear to be able to recognize weather patterns associated with thunderstorms and typically head for lower altitudes or even trees or other shelter during nasty weather. They have not evolved to be able to recognize the conditions under which ground-based anti-hail sound cannons will be detonated.

      Anti-hail cannons ignite acetylene and shoot pressure waves at supersonic speeds for the purpose of shattering just-formed ice crystals. They're powerful enough to have a radius of over a quarter mile. Wait for a flock of songbirds to be directly overhead and then crank it up about a pulse every five seconds, and you can knock every one of them right out of the air before they know what hit them. It's 92 decibels on the ground at a distance of 300 feet. Overhead, the pressure waves are much, much, louder than that, a hell of a lot louder than any thunder you have ever heard.

      But if it saves a farmer's peach crop from hail damage, then it's surely worth it, right? Birds just eat the damned peaches anyway. If a hail cannon sounds too cool and you've just got to have one, you can get them from a Texas company called Ollivier. Happy hunting!

    22. Re:Environmental Impact? by flatrock · · Score: 1

      My first question when I saw this was how does it effect birds.

      However, birds are smart enough to not fly around in a thunderstorm that's strong enough to produce hail, so I'm not sure it would impact them.

    23. Re:Environmental Impact? by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Isn't an umbrella bad for the enviornment because it keeps the water from getting to where it would have fallen? Nah...

      Just think of this as a big umbrella! :)

    24. Re:Environmental Impact? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Exactly - the sound pressure levels around an active sonar dome are such that the water is instantaneously boiled to a distance of several inches.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    25. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "killing a few hundred wales everytime"

      I never realized we were out to get the welsh... poor guys, i had a friend that was welsh once... he was a nice guy... to bad he vaprozied in front of my weather control device.... oh well... anyone want to be my new friend?!?

    26. Re:Environmental Impact? by ajagci · · Score: 1

      Isn't an umbrella bad for the enviornment because it keeps the water from getting to where it would have fallen? Nah..

      It's not an environmental issue, it's a liability issue. If you get me all wet by holding your umbrella wrong, you are liable for the damage you cause. The same applies here: if you damage someone else's property by messing with the weather, you bet you are going to be held responsible for that.

      Just think of this as a big umbrella! :)

      Yup. And just like with a big umbrella, you are responsible.

  20. They forgot to mention... by teledyne · · Score: 3, Funny

    They forgot to mention that Nissan's high frequency sound doesn't disrupt the hailstone process, it just tells the hailstones not to hit Nissan cars!

    1. Re:They forgot to mention... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Even that is not quite correct. It plays a sound bite from a Nissan commercial which says "Enjoy the Ride" so the hailstones will feel good about hitting a nissan, and hopefully not be quite so abusive.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. Oh boy. by illuminata · · Score: 5, Funny

    Customer Rep. Exec: Apparently consumers are complaining about hail damage to their cars.
    CEO: Hail damage?
    Head Engineer: Great, just great. The biggest problem that people want to complain about, we have no solution for. Hell, we were never even told that this was a problem!
    CEO: Ok, ok. Look, we have to think. Does anybody have an idea as to how we handle this?
    Guile: Sonic boom!

    And so, Col. Guile's post-Street Fighter career, previously up in the air, was solidified.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Oh boy. by Reneumann · · Score: 1

      awesome :D wish I still had mod points today

    2. Re:Oh boy. by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      The cannons are fired at the sky, so his career is STILL up in the air. ::ducks::

    3. Re:Oh boy. by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Where did all of those Howard Dean sigs go?

      Oh, they are still here... Somewhere... ;-)

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    4. Re:Oh boy. by illuminata · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Speaking of Dean, that reminds me, Nissan should've used Howard when developing their sonic cannon. I mean, did you see that speech where he started ye...

      *Cue music*

      NOBODY expects the Moderator Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise... surprise and fear.... fear and surprise... Our two weapons are fear and surprise... and ruthless efficiency... Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency.. and an almost fanatical devotion to the Dean... Our four...no... Amongst our weapons... Amongst our weaponry... are such elements as fear, surprise... I'll come in again...

      --


      Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  22. And now the bad news by Alita · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently you don't want to live nearby (see the bottom of the story).

    This sounds like it's worse than living next to an airport.

    1. Re:And now the bad news by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      This sounds like it's worse than living next to an airport.

      But will it drive away Godzilla?

  23. reduce the sound level? by ComaVN · · Score: 1

    The sound at ground zero is about 120 decibels, or about the same as a tornado warning siren. Workers are installing fences around two of the machines in the 140-acre parking lot at Nissan and filling the fences with hay in an effort to reduce the sound level.

    That's a joke, right? Maybe they should have installed them in an insulated bunker 1 mile underground.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  24. Hasn't think been around for a while? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In New Zealand, horticulturalists have used this technology for at least 5 or 10 years now. In the region I live in, hail storms often ruin the large apple crops which were once our main industry.

    Some horticulturalists have even been known to fly helicopters above their crops over night to stop frost from forming.

    1. Re:Hasn't think been around for a while? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      ...which were once our main industry.

      Fortunately replaced by a new and more profitable industry: hearing aid sales to everyone within ten miles of the device.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  25. Works great, by Bowdie · · Score: 1

    unfortunately, there's no glass in any of the cars anymore.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
  26. I, for one .... by dameon · · Score: 0, Troll

    .....Welcome our new Japanese Overlords

    --
    Remember, a truly wise man never plays leapfrom with a unicorn
  27. Sonic waves? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, every car I've seen in operation did produce sonic waves (also known as sound). But until now I thought it was because of normal operation, not to prevent hail. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:Sonic waves? by futuramarama · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally, I understand the cunning purpose of all those guys who install a subwoofer the size of their boot, in their boot

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
  28. Hilarious by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First reading of the article gave the impression that Nissan's new cars would be equipped with some kind of sound raygun which could be used for far more interesting things than blocking hailstones. Hey, aim that raygun at Ms Jone's house, watch the windows shatter. Cops coming? A little blast of decibels and their cars explode. Not to mention their eardrums and maybe even heads. Ugh.

    But no, we're not going to see commercialized versions of the famous Somalian 'technicals', pick-ups with anti-aircraft guns mounted in the back.

    Instead it's some kind of 'Highlander 2' plot in which giant rays are going to be beamed into the sky in order to prevent catastrophe raining down.

    So, I have three questions.

    (a) does anyone actually believe it's possible to stop hailstones forming in the heart of giant thunderclouds whose energies are hugely more than anything we can produce.

    (b) what happened to the 'roof'? A simple, yet efficient way of stopping hailstones.

    (c) who sold Nissan this thing? I'm looking for a good salesman for my company.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Hilarious by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (b) what happened to the 'roof'? A simple, yet efficient way of stopping hailstones.

      And would need to cover 140 acres, which is the size of the parking lot...

    2. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty big, but it's been done before.

      Advantages: also stops rain and dust, bird droppings and degradation from sunlight.

      And: when the car plant goes broke, makes a great venue for parties and concerts.

    3. Re:Hilarious by cgenman · · Score: 1

      And would need to cover 140 acres, which is the size of the parking lot...

      It's probably still cheaper than covering it in hundreds of thousands of cars.

    4. Re:Hilarious by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How big would a multistory with 140 acres of parking room be? I just can't escape the feeling that they'd be able to protect the cars far more effectively, be able to implement better security and increase the amount of green space around the factory by ripping up 140 acres of tarmac, building a roofed multistory and landscaping the remaining ground.

    5. Re:Hilarious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) Yes, because it's been used for a while now by farmers to protect crops.

      b) It's cheaper than building a 140 acre roof.

      c) After a and b, it pretty much sells itself.

    6. Re:Hilarious by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      How big would a multistory with 140 acres of parking room be?

      Wait! I know this one. At about 43,560 square feet per acre, you're looking at a building that covers 6,098,400 sqaure feet. Now, if you did that in four stories, it'd be 1,524,600 sqaure feet per level. In reality, you could do two buildings of two stories, and still have lots of room around them. They'd be really really big buildings, but I bet it's not impossible.

    7. Re:Hilarious by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

      Well, in the midwest US, it's not uncommon for hailstones to be golfball size or larger. I witnessed softball sized hail pound the ever-loving shit out of a parking lot full of cars in Denver many years ago. Not just broken windshields, but every upward exposed body panel was dented. Traditional roofs are good at protecting passengers, but are hugely expensive to repair.

      What I don't get, though seems to be changing, is the ongoing fascination with painted metal body panels, as if the auto industry made most of it's money out of collision repair, or something. Why not go with solid composite panels? Yeah, you lose that whole 'shiny' thing, but you also give up door dings, scratches, stone nicks, rust, *and* they'll hold up great to hailstones. A big storm will still take out your windows, but that's much harder to prevent and is fortunately much cheaper than body panels. I have a Saturn with metal hood/roof, but plastic door/fender/quarterpanels. The paint still scuffs, but no dents, which is better.

      Is the only reason why we persist with painted metal body panels because they're pretty? Structurally, they really don't add much to the car.

    8. Re:Hilarious by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      "Is the only reason why we persist with painted metal body panels because they're pretty? Structurally, they really don't add much to the car."

      I suspect it is because they are cheap and easy to make - just stick a sheet of metal in a press and BAM! - new fender.

      The process for making composite panels is somewhat more complex and time-consuming.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  29. How about... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just putting a roof over them?

  30. Blue Ice by Dark+Bard · · Score: 1

    Yeah but will it protect against blue ice falling from airliners?

    1. Re:Blue Ice by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

      Why would little plastic bags of Blue Ice be falling from a plane? They should refreeze and reuse them! Oh... you're not reffering to a brand name product are you???

  31. Holy Shit. Crowd-control, anyone? by torpor · · Score: 1

    This thing is dangerous technology just ripe for the sort of application which brings about massive disparity in the way people perceive technology.

    Hang on tight everyone. The next 10 years are going to get rough.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  32. I don't know about this by aarku · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Historically, planes used dry ice and flares to seed clouds and therefore prevent hail. This approach seems too loud for people around these machines. Aren't huge shockwaves like this thing produces the reason why jets are forbidden to fly over most land at supersonic speeds? Why is this ok?

    1. Re:I don't know about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of a sonic boom as a funnel, for the simple minded think the distortion effects that come off the bullets in Matrix slowmo ;)

      A plane flies horizontally, the shockwave will spread out from behind the plane and so half the shockwave will have contact with the ground (Or just disperse into air).

      This machine creates sonic booms that goes upwards, hence no problem. Apart from the 120db reflected noise.

    2. Re:I don't know about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck You, Asshole.

      The Concorde failed because of a combination of an insurmountable technical problem and a purely financial one. The unsolvable technical problem was the sonic boom, the explosivelike blast that followed like a shadow the Concorde's path overhead. This phenomenon occurred at the moment the plane pierced the sound barrier. It rattled windows and frightened birds, beasts and humans.

      So serious were the repercussions that governments banned the Concorde from flight over their lands.


      Eat that, cocksucking gay homo GNAA advocate.

      BTW: Plz die of AIDS. -K tnx.

  33. affects birds? by rexguo · · Score: 1

    Just wondering, what effects do these sonic waves have on birds that are flying up there? 50K feet with 1-mile radius is a pretty damn big area...

    --
    www.rexguo.com - Technologist + Designer
    1. Re:affects birds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all the birds flying during a hailstorm?

    2. Re:affects birds? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      They will all die, and Nissan cars will get beakmarked into oblivion, buried under a pile of bird carcasses. Which is, of course, as it *should* be.

      Toyota, meanwhile, is working on its car-sized umbrella concept, kept top secret and hidden away because it looks fucking stupid.

    3. Re:affects birds? by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      I dunno, probably less effect than flying in a hailstorm would have on them.

  34. WTF? by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1

    Whats wrong with making car pannels from polycarbonate or some other plastic that is essentially impervious to hailstones, costs pennies and whats more negates rust and pannelbeaters except in total reconstruction.... some cars today do to some extent, but it's usually minor, eg. Nissan Xtrail has plastic front fenders.

    --

    --
    "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    1. Re:WTF? by dario_moreno · · Score: 4, Informative

      it only pays off for small volume cars. The first generations of Renault Espace for instance were made of fiberglass, as the Alpines or Matras, but Espaces sells so well that now it is less expensive to manufacture them out of steel. Steel necessitates big investments in terms of presses, that's why europeans cars only change every 5 or 6 years, then the factories are sold to 2nd or 3rd world countries, but has better performance overall notwithstanding what you mention. Chassis tend to be made of aluminium to save weight in new BMWs, the bodywork is still made of steel.

      --
      Google passes Turing test : see my journal
    2. Re:WTF? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Plastic panels are annoying. They are more difficult and costly (yes costly) to repair than steel. The idea was you'd just throw them away (kind of hard to recycle a piece of funky plastic covered in primer and auto paint) and slap another one on but they never actually got that cheap. A metal body panel is both a blessing and a curse, when impacted it absorbs a lot of energy, certainly a lot more than the plastic one will. Of course that stress is translated into the rest of the car through the attachment points.

      As a sibling to this comment says, the fiero and saturn have plastic body panels. Over time the paint shifts differently on the plastic than on the metal. Go compare the old original paint of a fiero (if you can find a fiero that hasn't caught on fire or been kit-converted, let alone painted) and look at the hood and the fender.

      It does actually seem strange to me that plastic fenders have never taken off. The bumper covers are plastic these days, and the actual metal part of the bumper is now pretty carefully designed for crush capacity, unlike the old chromed metal bumpers which used to be on vehicles until the mid eighties, though mostly only US cars had them that late. It's not like the fenders are structural members, except on the Opel Aero maybe, which is allegedly a full-monocoque design. (Any unibody car is partial monocoque.) The quarter panels (what the uninitiated refer to as rear fenders) are load bearing in unibody vehicles however. With modern cars it's just not practical to have more than the fenders and door skins, and maybe the hood made out of plastic. (Or fiberglass.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 5, Informative

    These guys have seriously been had. Anyone that knows anything about atmospheric physics can tell you that most atmospheric models neglect sound waves, and for a very good reason--because they are insignificant when compared with other phenomena present in the atmosphere, such as...surprise...wind. Anything on the scale of a severe thunderstorm strong enough to produce golf-ball sized hail or larger will have vertical air motions in excess of 40-50 m/s (100mph). Combine this with the tremendous amount of turbulence associated with such violent vertical motions, and a few piddly sound waves don't stand a chance.

    Furthermore, hailstones of the size they're concerned with usually form miles from the location they actually fall in, and are held aloft for substantial periods of time--sometimes longer than an hour. Eventually, however, the updraft in the storm will weaken or reposition itself, and when it does, look out below. So even assuming this device could prevent hail from forming within a 1-mile radius of itself, your stuff is still gonna get the crap beat out of it anyway.

    Whether the guy that sold them on this was a meteorologist or not, this sort of crockery is what gives meteorologists a bad name.

    1. Re:What a Crock by lifer_red · · Score: 1

      Why "Golf-ball sized"? Surely this is also to prevent smaller hailstones - causing scratches, small chips etc.

    2. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Hailstones less than golf-ball sized usually don't dent, scratch, chip, or otherwise mar in any way the paint job on a vehicle. My friends and I have driven through enough hail while storm-chasing to know...just don't tell the insurance company. ;-)

    3. Re:What a Crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm none to sure myself, quoting energy amounts is really a quite useless exercise anyway. Total energy in a system can have very little to do with how much effort it takes to stop something from happening. Next to that, they only claim a free area. And say nothing about range of the device. Now personally they didn't really convince me of it working either, but on the other hand I have no real evidence or 'good' arguments on if it would work or not here. As such I remain skeptical until proven otherwise.

      Quickshot

    4. Re:What a Crock by wizrd_nml · · Score: 1
      Whether the guy that sold them on this was a meteorologist or not, this sort of crockery is what gives meteorologists a bad name.

      As opposed to the kind of crockery that comes out after a few minutes of lazy speculation sitting in front of your computer reading /.?

      Good job!

    5. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, some of us have years of experience in the field.

    6. Re:What a Crock by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      These guys have seriously been had. ... a few piddly sound waves don't stand a chance. ... hailstones of the size they're concerned with

      As other posters have pointed out, these systems have been used to protect high value crops since the eighties, and furthermore, Nissan are probably concerned with ALL sizes of hail - windscreen-smashing hail is sure nasty, but smaller hail can leave small nicks in paintwork which is extremely expensive across to put right - how many cars are in a 140-acre lot?
    7. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      To clarify, I wasn't "quoting energy amounts", but rather pointing out that in the equations of motion, the term representing sound waves is insignificant (by many orders of magnitude) when compared to terms representing quantities such as advection (wind), vorticity (turbulence), etc. In other words, any "effect" from this device would be nothing more than white noise in the grand scheme of things (no pun intended). Not to mention the fact that thunder--which occurs even more frequently than 5-6 sec in many storms, can be heard from farther away, and is associated with electromagnetic fields & ion counts the makers of this device can only dream of--sure seems to stop all that hail.

    8. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 3, Informative
      As other posters have pointed out, these systems have been used to protect high value crops since the eighties...

      That doesn't mean the system actually works, since damaging hail is very rare, even in the most hail-prone locations. Earlier incarnations of "hail cannons" have been around since the 1800s, when they shot random garbage skyward into thunderstorms...so ironically, whether or not the storm actually did anything, they were guaranteed a hail of trash (often nuts/bolts, things of that nature which were actually quite dangerous).

      ...and furthermore, Nissan are probably concerned with ALL sizes of hail...

      Unless Nissan uses Rust-O-Leum to paint their cars, in my experience you need severe hail (defined by the National Weather Service as 0.75" in diameter) at the very *least* to do anything to the paint job of an automobile. I've never seen hail less than about 1 1/2" leave any visible mark on a car, and I've seen plenty of hail. If I had just brought a brand-new Mercedes, I would have no problems with driving it through a hailstorm with a maximum hail size of 1". It sounds really bad when it's hitting your car, but doesn't do anything.

    9. Re:What a Crock by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      These guys have seriously been had. Anyone that knows anything about atmospheric physics can tell you that most atmospheric models neglect sound waves, and for a very good reason--because they are insignificant when compared with other phenomena present in the atmosphere, such as...surprise...wind.

      Well...it may be counterintuitive, but it probably isn't safe to write it off without a test. Perhaps the shock waves generated are tuned somehow to be particularly effective at disrupting hail.

      My area of expertise is optical phenomena, not sound, so I'll take an example from my field. A thirty watt incandescent lamp is pretty weak--you can read by it, but it's pretty dim. Staring at a thirty watt argon laser will rapidly blind you, while the beam from a thirty watt carbon dioxide laser will easily ignite wood.

      I agree with the parent poster that any sound energy generated by this device will be absolutely infinitesimal compared to the total energy available in even a moderate thunderstorm. Nevertheless, I think we would need to know about the possible coherence of the sound and its frequency spectrum before we can say if it might or might not be effective. Also of note, the goal is not the complete disruption of the thunderstorm. All Nissan seeks to do is reduce the size of the hailstones produced to the point where they won't damage their cars. It may be that it is (relatively) easy to disrupt the process of large hailstone formation. Rain, snow, sleet, or millimeter-size hailstones won't hurt their inventory.

      The question of hailstones carried significant distances to the site is an interesting one. Perhaps the device causes the storm to drop the stones beyond the perimeter of the parking lot...or perhaps Nissan is following a strategy of reducing their risk. They acknowledge there will still be hail damage; they're just hoping for less.

      Presumably, Nissan management is not populated entirely by idiots who get off on public humiliation--wouldn't you expect there to have been some testing of this device before installation?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    10. Re:What a Crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I envy you, living in some magical place where damaging hail is so rare that it's not worth worrying about. For some of us, though, it's just common enough to warrant some precautions. The larger car dealerships in my area (west-central Texas) have installed roofs over their lots to protect against hail damage. Granted, it has other benefits, too. Shade is one, and so is preventing sunlight reflecting off of a thousand windshields from blinding drivers on the freeway, but they heavily advertized that they added the roofs to prevent hail damage. Nissan probably doesn't think it's feasible (or attractive) to build a roof to cover over a hundred acres. Maybe this particular solution is a load of molarkey, but it was probably cheap enough for Nissan that they decided it couldn't hurt to try.

    11. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Actually, I live in one of the most climatologically favored locations for damaging hail--central Oklahoma. I never meant to insinuate that large hail is not something to be concerned about, but rather to point out that its relative rarety can easily explain why there would be anecdotal "evidence" that claims these devices actually work.

    12. Re:What a Crock by hailstop · · Score: 1

      Well, here's one problem. Hail takes about 30 minutes to grow from a hail embryo to golf ball size. Thunderstorms usually are travelling around 20 mph and during the spring, often faster. So this would need to have a radius of effect of 10 miles. And most thunderstorms won't dump their load on that site anyways, considering how small it is. So if it's really effective, it should be over a wide area. Which it isn't. Because it doesn't work.

    13. Re:What a Crock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm...

      in Calgary when we get damaging hail it is not so much the paint chipping as the metal being dented...

    14. Re:What a Crock by vortexau · · Score: 1

      > in my experience you need severe hail to do anything to the paint job of an automobile.
      Well, I've got news for you. Here, in S.E. Queensland, there have been several ocassions when cars in salesyards have had their upper surfaces pock-marked enough that the cars had been put up for auction.

      Some will bid for for them as cheaper current-model cars; not minding the non-smooth finish.
      .

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
    15. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you had some severe hail, then.

  36. I can understand the use for crops by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hail damage can ruin an entire crop and it is not like most farmers are on such high margins they can afford the loss of a year. However to protect a parking lot? Never heard of a roof?

    Don't get me wrong. We got one of those car parks in the dock area here and it is huge but it wouldn't need to be a complex roof and its success would be 100%. Also stops sunlight and seagull shit and acid rain.

    So nice story, didn't know this was even possible but Nissan probably got had. Will be intresting to hear what their neighbours will have to say about it. Noise polution in a 5 mile area? Never be allowed over here. Here people complain they can hear the trains in the house they bought that is next the rail track.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I can understand the use for crops by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Farmers carry insurance for that protection. Seems like a better idea to me, we grow far more crops than we need, so let insurance cover the small amount that are destroyed, and leave the weather alone.

      Remember when car were going to save the cities from pollution? Of course not, because that was about 100 years ago, but back about 1900 cars were welcomed in many cities because they didn't leave droppings all over the streets. Of course today we know about the droppings they leave all over the air... I don't know which is worse. (Yes I know that not everyone welcomed cars, but many did)

  37. for the birds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so, is this thing anywhere near the recent bird kill in china? http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml? type=topNews&storyID=453358&section=news
    10,000 birds fall from sky for unknown reasons in china.

  38. Nissan first tested this in Redmond... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    almost 3 years ago. I guess we now know what happened to Hailstorm.

  39. GAAAA by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    RTFM: this is designed to protect the car park of thousands of new cars, to stop them getting dented predelivery. They're not mounting sonic cannon on the roof of each vehicle, although if it was an option I *would* buy it!

    1. Re:GAAAA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the right acronym, jackoff

    2. Re:GAAAA by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      What he meant was go read the car's manual... that way you'll see there's no sonic device

  40. So presumably... by Channard · · Score: 1

    .. we can look forward to Samantha Carter, Tokra Barbie and that chick who played Morrigan draped semi-clad over the bonnets of the cars at a motor show.

  41. um... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't mean to be a spoilsport, but ... why don't they just build a roof?

    *looks puzzled*

  42. Holy Hailstorms, Batman! by Channard · · Score: 0

    Beams, schmeams. What I'd really pay good money for would be a Batman The Movie style car shield. One click on the remote and shakakakakakakakkaka - instant anti-hailstone, anti-car thief and anti-keying shield.

  43. Re:Nothing really matters. by javiercero · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Laser Beams" you frikin' idiot....

    SILENCE!!! Your insolence will not be tolerated!

  44. I still don't get it. by 10537 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a device fitted to my house to prevent damage from hailstones. I call it a roof. It's silent, consumes no power, and also protects against rain, snow, intense sun, falling birds, and a whole host of other things...

    --
    This sentence no verb.
  45. Hailstones by !3ren · · Score: 1


    And if you stand on the roof correctly prevents/corrects kidney stones too!

  46. Avianic Death Rays by danielrm26 · · Score: 1

    "In other news, the plug was pulled on the project after a few early-adopters noticed huge numbers of dead birds falling from the sky and smashing the otherwise pristine vehicles."

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
  47. Will the Sonic Booms... by i-Chaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... drive nearby sandworms to a frenzy and provoke them to attack the vehicle, swallowing it whole?

    --
    ...I am proof that intelligent beings are not always intelligent...
    1. Re:Will the Sonic Booms... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It wasn't practical on arrakis because the fremen had all the water in caverns, but all you need to protect yourself from sandworms is a moat. Or perhaps even a sprinkler system.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. Nissan today announces... by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their new hail protection system has saved them millions of dollars in damage to cars.

    However, they system's "sonic boom" has broken millions of dollars in windows.

    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  49. as usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is Canada' Fault

  50. Re:this is so off topic, but it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wtf is he doing? is this some football-related activitiy that just looks like he's jacking off?

  51. I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by bgspence · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the 1970's I was able to buy a hail damaged new Falcon for $750. Ford was dumping them because the cost to repair the damage would be more than the car was worth. I thought it was a super deal.

    It had dozens of quarter sized dimples, and ran really fast. I'm not sure, but it might have benefited from some kind of golf ball wind resistance effect.

    1. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      >It had dozens of quarter sized dimples, and ran really fast. I'm not sure, but it might have benefited from some kind of golf ball wind resistance effect.

      Homer: [suspicious] Hey, what are all these holes?
      Salesman: [quickly] These are speed holes. They make the car go faster.
      Homer: Oh, yeah. Speed holes!

      [bullets riddle the car and smash the windshield]

      Salesman: You want my advice? I think you should buy this car.

      Gotta love snpp!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by dtmos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may have been prescient: The new Lexus LS-430 has golf ball dimples on the underside.

    3. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe the flanders mobile could use some speedholes.......

    4. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because Lexus store their cars upside down in the parking lot.

    5. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's bizarre. I know they have access to a wind tunnel and I don't, so they must know many things I don't, but shouldn't that increase turbulence over having a smooth bottom, producing lift? Or is the rippled surface supposed to increase speed of flow, and thus downforce?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I call bullshit! Very little short of a tactical nuclear device could have dented the Ford Falcon. After fatal accidents involving a Falcon and a tree, or some other immovable object, they would simply hose off the Falcon and sell it to the next victim, er, driver.

    7. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Would these be similar to the "speed holes" Homer had on his car, and offered to put on Ned's?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  52. Batlow Australia by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I visited Batlow (the apple capital of NSW) over 14 years ago, they had sonic cannons for hail protection at the time. So yeah, slashdot, "news from the 1980s revisited". I hear that these new fangled phones that don't use wires are coming onto the market too (yup, I saw a homeless beggar using one at the weekend), so maybe slashdot will be reporting on that too? :-)

  53. Re:Damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi.

    This thing is 120dB,

    Jets are closer to 200dB.

    Someone better tell the fucking jets to stop being so loud or they'll explode!

    Can I use your post as scientific evidence when everybody laughs at me?

    Also, all the birds in the area die spontaneously when lightning strikes. You know, that thing that can rattle your windows from over ten miles away? The thing that exceeds 300dB at ground zero?

    Fucktard.

  54. This method sounds like it will really work... by GuidoDEV · · Score: 1

    ...especially since hail is never associated with thunderstorms.

  55. If I were a little bird... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I would get very scared, from these "attacks", and I'd surely try to mobilize all my bird friends, follow the car, and when the owner steps out, well, shit on his head....

  56. German Sound Weapons in WWII by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of the German antipersonnel sonic cannon developed during WWII.

    Apparently, this one required a targetted infantryman to remain in place for more than half a minute, but the idea is probably similar.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:German Sound Weapons in WWII by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On a vaguely related note: SRL V1

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:German Sound Weapons in WWII by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Ja ja, secret German design. (The device was called "Sieg Heil"). Had they succeeded, the weather in UK would be utterly befouled.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  57. Can you say Fiero? I knew you could! by sn0wcrash · · Score: 1

    This ws done years ago. My '85 Fiero GT proudly boats a complete plastic body skin. This was reintroduced by Saturn, they claimed it was a revolutionary idea. Hah. I think they were trying to get away from the bad press the Fiero got. I have heard no car burns quite like a Fiero, however I don't know about Saturns. I believe they use a difrent plastic. Also the roofs are steel if I remember correctly. And for those that think this means the car is lighter, not so. You need to see a Fiero without the skins on. They are not light cars. The other advantage is rust. I think that works against car companies. They like their new disposable cars. They want you to trade in your car before you pay it off. Everyone makes money but you.

  58. Pegging the needle on the BS-ometer by dtmos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree completely. Reading about this system made me marvel at the salesmanship involved. You'd think anyone past high school would recognize such obvious pseudoscience, but I guess the saying about fools being born every minute is a great truism. People don't realize how rare hail damage is, statistically, and so they can be led to believe that systems like this work, when it's just very likely that hail hasn't fallen on that 100-acre plot of land in the last three years because, well, hail wasn't going to fall there in the first place.

    Unless Nissan got a better deal, even the company's guarantee is worthless, viz.:

    [...]

    Anti-Hail clause

    In order to respect its obligation of fully satisfied or money back warranty, Hail Stop Equipment inc. warrants to the users of its product a protection against hail on a 500 meters (1650 pi.) radius. If the customer had damages caused by hail inside the protected zone, then Hail Stop Equipment inc. will compensate the customer's losses. The refund value is limited to the lesser of both amounts; either to the value of the losses or the amount that the customer paid to buy its Ollivier Hail Suppression system(R). The customer requests are subjected to a $5,000US exemption. A preheating delay of 20 minutes must occure to give the time to the Ollivier system to reaches optimal efficiency.

    In order to keep your guarantee your 3 years warranty effective, Hail Stop Equipment inc. require a complete annual audit of the system to deliver a yearly certificate of conformity attesting that the system has been inspected (and adjusted if need be) and Hail Stop Equipment inc. takes back its warranty for another year until the end of the third year from the date of installation. The certificate also confirms the eligibility to the service contract renewal. The yearly certification assures the customer that its system is always functional, safe and efficient. If you are covered by an optional service contract, then the manpower required for the works of yearly certification is free. [emphasis added]

    So, even if hundreds of acres of cars are hail-damaged while the system is in use (after the 20-minute warmup period), the company is only liable for the cost of the "hail suppression system", minus $5000! However, you have to pay, either directly or via a service contract, for an annual inspection to keep the 3-year warrranty in force--price undisclosed.

    The only way this makes any economic sense for Nissan is if they got the system for free, so that the shyster company can use them as a showcase customer, for the publicity value. Even then, you'd think the public embarassment at being associated with such a scam would be intolerable.

    The whole thing reminds me of the story about the guy jumping up and down in the middle of the street, blowing a whistle. Someone walks up and says,

    "Why are you blowing the whistle?"

    "To scare the elephants away."

    "Elephants? There are no elephants around here!"

    "See? It's working!"

    1. Re:Pegging the needle on the BS-ometer by Cygnusx12 · · Score: 1

      "Elephants? There are no elephants around here!"
      "See? It's working!"


      How much for your whistle?

  59. Re:Altering Weather... Great! (Good Analogy) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That said, I'm really curious if it even works. Of course it works!! Here's a little fun with science you can make yourself that proves how this works. What you need: 1 peice of paper. 1 speaker, connected to a stereo. some music. Start by ripping the paper into little shreds and balling them up into tiny little balls. Next, take all the little balls and mash them together into one big ball. Now if you have decent speakers you can just set the paperball mass on top of the cabinet. For those wussy computer speakers, I recomend turning it on it's side and placing the ball directly in the cone. Now crank up your volume and watch what happens to those little balls. They start dancing around and the bigger ball falls apart! See! Now imagine that on a smaller scale, say ice crystal size. That is exactly what is happening to the hail when it gets sonically blasted.

    I hear this same analogy can also be demonstrated with a jackhammer and some concrete blocks.

  60. Re:Holy Shit. Crowd-control, anyone? by Peer · · Score: 1

    Holy Shit. Crowd-control, anyone?

    Well I've seen better ...

  61. Re:Holy Shit. Crowd-control, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are already commercial sonic crowd control weapons. The idea being to overload the sensory systems of the targets more than to injure them. I think a special human-targetted frequency is used instead of relying on huge amplitude (although, they're probably pretty loud too). Kind-of along the lines of flash-bangs, but only aural (although, depending upon the frequency, more than the ears could be affected). I have no idea if they're used frequently yet. Only slighty more evil than the chemical deterrence systems commonly employed already. I have no idea if there is long-term hearing loss related to being the target (the human ear "disconnects" for a while when exposed to sudden loud sounds, so that would likely minimize any damage).

  62. Re:Holy Shit. Crowd-control, anyone? by torpor · · Score: 1

    I personally think it would be super, super danagerous for a society to deploy these sorts of 'mind-fuck' technologies on its populace.

    So you go to an event to protest, and all over town you start hearing voices in your head telling you that "dictator X is a nice guy" ...

    Sheesh. We're on thin ice. Give these tools to the neo-cons who have no problem with using brainwashing techniques to justify their mission, and we're all fucked...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  63. Protects the parking lot, not your car by rbowen · · Score: 1

    Astonishingly, the article is more informative than the comments of people who didn't read the article. Imagine that.

    The device protects the parking lot at the plant. It's not something that will be installed on your next Altima.

    --
    Apache guy, Open Source enthusiast, runner
  64. Nissan should fix their paint by MMHere · · Score: 1

    I own a Nissan, and monitor a couple of online communities.

    In those communities, concensus is: Nissan's paint sucks. Hail hacks it, minor road debris hacks it. In my experience, my car has more chips after two years of ownership (bought new) than several previous cars I owned.

    Are they using ray guns to protect their low investment in paint?

    Hail that damages the sheet metal is pretty big. Paint-only-damaging hail is smaller. Any way round it, I think their ray-gun is a hack.

  65. Is this... by s-meister · · Score: 1

    ...a Weapon of Meteorological Destruction? Great troll though. You mean this is serious?

  66. Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but can they install Linux on it yet?

  67. first, hail stopper by Ba3r · · Score: 1

    next, weather machine. Now that Saddam has been ousted, what evil villain will take on the project?

  68. Uh, roof? by twilight30 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't a fucking roof be cheaper -- and more intelligent? They need to screw up local weather patterns as well? Have they done environmental studies for collateral effects?

    Jesus.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Uh, roof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...collateral effects?"

      Can it kill Iraqi's?

    2. Re:Uh, roof? by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah but would the article about a new roof over some dealership / autoplant appear on Slashdot?
      Think different, people!

    3. Re:Uh, roof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to second this because it's so unbelievably obvious. Build a roof. This is a case of overexcited engineers with a budget.

      -ook

    4. Re:Uh, roof? by Imperator · · Score: 1

      Have you ever seen an American car dealership? Imagine a small castle of a dealership building surrounded, as far as the eye can see, by fields of shining cars waiting to be hawked. A roof would have to be huge, and would need to contain enough lighting to keep the whole lot brightly lit during the day.[1] Not only that, it would either need to be closed off (at which point you're basically paying for a warehouse--and on a sunny day, who wants to go car shopping in a warehouse), or extended beyond the ends of the car lots, because hail doesn't always fall straight down; hailstorms tend to be associated with wind as well.

      So a fucking roof would actually be quite expensive; it's almost certainly cheaper to just insure the cars against hail damage. Now, that still doesn't excuse falling for a snake oil scheme.

      [1] Actually most car dealerships already are (at night) brighter than the sun, but they don't pay to keep those lights on during the day.

      --

      Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  69. used here quite a while to protect the orchards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a guy here on tv in belgium that uses it for years already to protect his apple orchard... Apparantly it IS very effective...

    1. Re:used here quite a while to protect the orchards by hailstop · · Score: 1

      Uhh, Belgium isn't exactly Hail Alley. Lets see these guys stick some of these along the Rocky Mountain foothills and see how well they work.

  70. If only... by darkitecture · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only they could make a cannon that could get rid of those pesky bike couriers who lean on your car.

    1. Re:If only... by stienman · · Score: 1

      Put some dangly wires from an electrostatic generator to the ground, and charge the car body to a few thousand volts. Set it up so it's only charged when the vehicle is not in park. Remember to put it in park before you exit.

      I'm sure there's an easy way to turn all four wheels into a VandeGraaff generator

      Of course, I'm a cyclist, so if I find your car has an abnormally large charge, I'll help it discharge by removing the gas cap, dropping a wire inside, and allowing it to slowly fall out of the car through wind resistance until it contacts ground.

      -Adam

  71. I coulda saved them a lot of money.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they really needed was a freakin' tarp.

  72. MLB by john_is_war · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think the real question everyone wants to know is "Will it keep Major League Baseball from spying on me?"

    --
    Live life to the fullest. It's not that life is short, but that you are dead for so long.
  73. Re:Damage by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jets are closer to 200dB.

    not quite: Jet engine at 3m : 140dB
    Seems you're off by a factor 1 million.

    Still, it seems pretty unlikely to affect, let alone damage, an aircraft.

    Also, I doubt lightning is THAT loud. Where did you get that number?

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  74. A small hail-free patch (photo) by blorg · · Score: 1
    "If you can repeatedly show hailstorms with a small hail-free patch surrounding the device"


    They have a photo of just that on their website (bottom right of the page).

    1. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by mrgeometry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, that web site looks pretty sketchy to me, not that I'm an expert. The photo you mentioned has a white area in the foreground---could be snow, could be hail---and a HUGE non-white area in the background. That is NOT a picture of a "small hail-free patch", surrounded by an area with hail. There is no hail or snow visible on the far side of the hail-free area. It does not seem possible from the picture on their website to verify that the white stuff is actually hail; it could be snow. The whole thing could be Photoshop.

      Other pages on the site have:

      * inconsistent information (every 5.5 seconds; every 6 seconds; every 5 seconds; the noise level is listed at various levels, too...)
      * dubious statements like "supersonic explosions do not affect animals"
      * incorrect spelling and punctuation
      * overuse of jargon and jargon-y words (such as "ascending thermionic explosions"). Looking at this web site, I got the feeling that they did not want me to understand how it works, they just want me to be impressed.
      * Worst of all: statistics! Why do they start the noise level measurements 50m away? Are you not supposed to go closer than 50m while it's operating? What if you install this on the roof of your car?

      Of course, they don't have to explain their patented super-invention to me. But if they are going to deliberately withhold information, they could have been less patronizing about it! Overall, the site seems to have a very low level of professionalism. To whatever degree this reflects on the device itself, it reflects poorly.

      zach

    2. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 1

      could be snow, could be hail

      It's *snail!*

    3. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's designed for the top of your car. It's designed for placing in huge storage parking lot for fleets of cars. As such, the most important sound consideration is from neighboring businesses and houses. I think that even if it had damaging sound levels at close range, that would be acceptable and just require the use of earphones when you approach it while it is operating. After all, it only runs during big storms. Its not like it would be going off 24/7.

      I won't speculate as to how well it works.. I have no Idea.

    4. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's designed for the top of your car
      Maybe it's not designed for the car... but I bet it'd be a kick-ass horn for your car in traffic - or maybe when that asshole cuts you off, let him know who's boss.

      Don't think I'd ever want to be honked at by one of those, but it'd sure come in handy here in NJ.
      --
      # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
      #
    5. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I don't think it's designed for the top of your car.

      Aaaah, after you said that, I went back to read the post, since I had the same doubts as the other guy.

      > a device that suppresses hail formation to protect its fleet of new vehicles from hailstorm damage

      I originally read this to mean that the new cars would each have one to be protected instead of their entire fleet being in a single location (or large groups) protected by these devices.

      So this does nothing for the purchaser except give them a better chance of buying a car that was not previously hail-damaged. Of course, you would probably notice the dents & nicks all over before buying it.

      Just goes to show you that reading the article really is a good idea.

  75. Daimler-Benz does the same by T-Punkt · · Score: 1

    Daimler (now Daimler-Chrysler) the maker of Mercedes cars and the like, does some hailstorm protection as well. But they use the "traditional" method of using planes to spray silver iodide into or over the top of the clouds which reduces or prevents the build-up of large hail stones.

    See here for more info about this method.

  76. In Other News... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1, Troll


    In Other News, Nissan Of North America executives are mysteriously taken away in black vans for possession of "WMD's", after an US Air Force AWACS plane was almost downed after flying over the Nissan plant.

    There were no comments from Nissan, but the U.S. Government cannot confirm nor deny any Nissan executives may or may not be held at what may or may not be a base in the country that may or may not be known as "Cuba"

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  77. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the sixties, I developed a weather-changing machine which was, in essence, a sophisticated heat beam which we called a "laser". Using these "lasers", we punch a hole in the protective layer around the world which we call the "ozone layer". Slowly but surely, ultra-violet rays would pour in, increasing the risk of skin cancer. That is, unless, the world pays us a hefty ransom?

  78. Ephalants by Metryq · · Score: 1

    This thing is going to piss off every elephant in the neighborhood! On top of that, Nissan will have to start worrying about ruptured birds crashing into their cars. "We don't understand it! Whales have been beaching themselves all over the lot!"

  79. Which one? by Benm78 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Which type of damage do you mean:

    1. Bat-dropping damage
    2. Droppig-bat dagamge

    I guess #2 would be an option if this sonic cannon packs enough of a punch. However, the real threat to both vehicles and mankind seems to come from dropping-stork damage.

    1. Re:Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which type of damage do you mean:

      1. Bat-dropping damage
      2. Droppig-bat dagamge


      Why was this modded offtopic? For all I know low-flying animals might well be stunned by a powerful blast of noise and might well land on the very things which the blast of noise is supposed to protect. Anyone want to explain why this wouldn't cause animals (small birds, insects, maybe bats) to get stunned, fall from the sky, and land on passing cars?

  80. Wilhelm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me crazy but isnt this just an extension of Reich's work with cloudbusters? Granted its a little more technical than pipes pointed in the air but it sure seems awful familiar to me. Heres hoping the techs responsible for this one dont get wilhelm's excellent retirement plan...

  81. Build them into the cars! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    Now what I'd really like to see is one of these toys as part of an options package.

    Road rage? Someone cut you off? ZOT! BWAM! 120 decibels to the kisser!

    They could sell it as a device to counter snowballs dropped on your roof by idiot kids on highway overpasses. Nail the little bastards while you're at it as well...

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  82. Can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one am looking forward to this one. I can't wait to see the law of unintended consequences smack us for this one..

  83. Wouldn't it be simpler... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 0

    to just install sheet metal roofing over the ground where the cars are parked?

  84. Military version by GQuon · · Score: 1

    A military version is in development:
    Picture of this baby.

    Type: Advanced Battle Tank
    Armament: Sonic Amplifier
    Speed: 44 km/h (tracked)
    Armor: Medium
    Crew: 2

    Developed by Hailstop and General Motors, this enhanced tank utilizes sound waves technology to fire a powerful blast of sonic energy at its target. The high energy frequencies break down the molecular structure of affected victims.

    --
    Dune II ;-)

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
    1. Re:Military version by chadjg · · Score: 1

      The day the United States Army takes the rocket packs off of their MLRS and installs a bank of Airzookas, the United States invaded by Lichtenstein.

      I do believe there are some infrasonic weaons in development. They are supposed to make the targets go stupid and crap their pants. It's a short ranged, riot control type of deal I think.

      The only info I have on this is a half memory from a Discovery episode. Most of the links I found were a bit heavy on the conspiracy theories to be credible. Sorry about that.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  85. Red Alert 2 by caitsith01 · · Score: 0

    Wow, it's Red Alert 2! It's all coming true!

    "WARNING! Weather control device detected!"

    "WARNING! Catastrophic lightning storm created!"

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  86. Re:Damage by azaris · · Score: 1

    Also, I doubt lightning is THAT loud. Where did you get that number?

    Comparison of Various Noise Sources in the Ocean:

    Lightning Strike on Water Surface
    260 dB (approximately) (1)

    From: Hill, R.D. 1985. Investigation of lightning strikes to water surface. JASA 78(6):2096-2099.

    An estimated conversion from dB under water to dB in air is to subtract 62 dB, so that would come out as about 200 dB.

  87. It's not O/T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's usually moderated "Interesting" or "Informative"

  88. new product for thinkgeek.com by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

    This would be much better than the Airzooka toy. Not only could you mess up someone's hair from across the room, you could probably stop their heart as well.

  89. We no copy, we make better by palstar · · Score: 1

    The device is called a "hail cannon" and they have been in operation in (at least) southeastern Ohio for decades. I saw one during a bicycle ride there last fall and one of the locals explained what it was. Next...

  90. Daimler's hail protection for Mercedes by sbryant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Daimler also have hail protection for their large car park of brand new Mercedes cars at Sindelfingen (by Stuttgart), but they don't use sonic booms. They have two Cessna pilots on standby, who will fly up and ionise the clouds or something like that, which stops the hail from forming. It seems to work well, too.

    -- Steve

    1. Re:Daimler's hail protection for Mercedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, here's a company in the Northern Plains that actually does this stuff...farmers actually pay these guys to seed storms before they can drop severe hail so that it doesn't destroy their wheat.

      http://www.weathermod.com/index.php

      GuidoDEV...suck it. You are a Guido-karma $lut.

  91. Nobel prize in math to these guys by lateralus · · Score: 1

    They found out that the way to solve the Collatz problem was to prevent the hailstone sequence from happening in the first place!!

    --
    If you outlaw the law, only criminals will have laws
  92. Why they need this by nosaj72 · · Score: 1

    The article didn't mention this, but last year at their Smyrna, TN plant (where the Pathfinder, Xterra, Altima and Maxima are made) they had 10,000 cars in inventory destroyed in a hail storm. That's a lot of dough (10,000 x $20,000 to $30,000). The vehicles they make at this plant in Canton are even more expensive.

  93. bats by momokatte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fighter would probably appear to be a deep cave opening to a bat, rather than give the impression that the hangar is completely empty. They probably all flew into it at top speed expecting to find a great place to live.

  94. Buy this by W1K-Galoot · · Score: 1
    For Sale: ZapCap

    Over 100,000 sold at $25 each! Guaranteed to prevent lightning from striking your head!
    If product does not work as advertised, return for a full refund.

    (Disclaimer: In cases of product failure, we are liable for no more than... oh... does $1000 sound good? Sure. One grand it is. We've sold lots already.)

    --
    Been using sigs for 20 years. Nothing funny left to say.
  95. hail? by k0-0mar · · Score: 1

    wish they'd make sumthin to vaporise bird-droppings b4 they adorn the roof of my car :(

    darned sticky things!!!

  96. How hail forms and why this won't work by Orp · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Hailstones are formed and begin with a piece of dust in the clouds," he explains. "There is a lot of activity going on, and what we do is to de-ionize that activity in the clouds and keep those dust particles from collecting moisture out of the clouds in turn reacting and forming what we know as a hailstone."

    I'm a professor of meteorology. If one of my students had written that drivel I would have flunked 'em!

    The microphysics of clouds is very complex. I'd really like to know what mechanism they really are trying to stifle here. Here is a bit on how hail forms. First, some background:

    In a rapidly growing cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) cloud, you have a strong updraft (air rising rapidly). This air is contains humid air, which condenses to form liquid cloud droplets as it cools (rising air expands and cools - basic thermodynamics). It is indeed true that cloud droplets condense upon pieces of dust/salt/gunk in the atmosphere, but ionization has very very little to do with it. Many of these so-called condensation nuclei are not ionized. Water will condense upon just about anything if cooled enough.

    Eventually this rising, cloudy air reaches heights where temperatures are well below freezing - say -20 degrees C. Water actually does not have to freeze when it is below 0 degrees C, and in fact what leads to lots of hail is the fact that there is an abundance of supercooled (below freezing liquid) cloud droplets in this cloud.

    Eventually some ice crystals form, either spontaneously (supercooled cloud droplets freeze at about -40 degrees C - this is called homogeneous nucleation of ice), or because they come in contact with an ice nucleus (something that has a similar crystal structure to water ice). These ice crystals fall and co-mingle with the supercooled cloud droplets. Due to the difference in saturation vapor pressures over ice and water at a given temperature, these ice crystals grow and grow at the expense of the cloud droplets without actually making physical contact!

    Now the stage is set for hail. There is an abundance of supercooled cloud droplets, which freeze upon contact with ice crystals. Contact is made, and graupel is formed. Graupel is kind of an intermediate form of ice between snow and hail. The updraft of the storm keeps everything going, and in fact can suspend heavy hail particles for a while before they either become so heavy they fall through the updraft, or they are tossed horizontally to a part of the storm where they fall to the ground. The largest hailstones form with the strongest updrafts because the hail can acrete lots and lots of supercooled water (hail will melt and refreeze also as it rises and falls within the cloud).

    Again, I simply cannot fathom what process they are trying to stifle with these sound waves. Hail suppression research has focused mainly on seeding clouds with silver iodide. Silver iodide is a powdery substance which has an ice crystal shape very similar to that of water ice. Overseeding a cloud with AgI, so the theory goes, will convert all that supercooled cloud water into small ice crystals, scavenging all the liquid so there won't be any "lucky" graupel particles growing to the size of hail stones.

    The Russians claimed some success with this process during the cold war (launching AgI laced rockets into clouds) but frankly I think they were overstating their success. Hail suppression work reached its peak in the 70's but because of the lack of any real statistical success, funding for this kind of work has pretty much dried up.

    Anyway, a sucker is born every minute.

    Leigh Orf

    --
    A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
    1. Re:How hail forms and why this won't work by tspauld98 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the great explanation. I also have questions about this method of hail supression. I'd like to know how they expect this technology to interact with aircraft. Last I checked, unwanted vibrations of any sort are the enemy of high-performance engineering. Seems like a device such as this would be difficult to direct and therefore would impact more than just an isolated weather event.

      Just a thought...

      tims

      --
      "Ahhhh, best laid plans of mice and men... and Cookie Monster." -- Cookie Monster, Sesame Street
    2. Re:How hail forms and why this won't work by hailstop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm glad you posted that, so I wouldn't have to. I've been a meteorologist working on the Alberta Hail Suppression Project for four of the past 6 years and really get annoyed by this stuff....

    3. Re:How hail forms and why this won't work by brain1 · · Score: 1

      Here's the manufacturer:
      http://www.hailstop.qc.ca/en/hailst op/

      The apparently believe in their technology enough to stand behind it with a warranty:

      "Anti-Hail clause

      In order to respect its obligation of fully satisfied or money back warranty, Hail Stop Equipment inc. warrants to the users of its product a protection against hail on a 500 meters (1650 pi.) radius. If the customer had damages caused by hail inside the protected zone, then Hail Stop Equipment inc. will compensate the customer's losses."

      However, I agree with you in that this seems to fly in the face of known meteorology. Interestingly enough, they seem to be willing willing to "bet the farm" on their technology. I wouldnt want to live near it though.

  97. Not really all that new by mbasyro13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not really that new. There is an apple orchard near my grandparents farm that has a sound cannon to prevent hail damage to the apples. I've seen it operate a couple of times. You can actually watch the sound waves ripple through the rain/hail in the sky. We use to always speculate whether or not it really works...apparently he thinks it does

    The only real difference here is the application and the radar (the farmer would manually turn it on)

  98. what about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    birds, planes?

  99. Bats? Rare and protected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about no, Scott.

    http://www.batcon.org/discover/congress.html

    I hope you never wash your clothes again, thus killing dozens of dust mites.

  100. Where do you put it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't read the article, but can someone tell me where I mount this thing? on the roof right? Controls on the dash under the radio?

  101. How about the birds? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

    ...or do we not consider them anything but debris these days?

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    1. Re:How about the birds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we worry about birds in front of tornado sirens?

    2. Re:How about the birds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Generally, they stay in the trees. Birds flying through a thunderstorm powerful enough to form hail were about to become debris anyway.

  102. It also comes in handy... by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 1

    ...when you're being attacked by an Aleutian terrorist armed with obsidian blades.

    --

    I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  103. Um, people.. this is not a SMALL parking lot by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These "parking lots" are not small. They can be over 10 ACERS in size. The average plant has a parking area 4 to 5 acers in size. You have any clue as to how much it would cost to build a roof like that?

    The technology is solid and has been proven. The cost ratio is better to go with a sound generator.

    Now, all we need is something to disrupt tornadoes...

    1. Re:Um, people.. this is not a SMALL parking lot by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1
      No, wait I was wrong.. that's the employee parking lots. The vehicle lots average 150+ acers.

      Sorry about that. Only one coffee so far this morning.

  104. New Message on window sticker... by RegalBegal · · Score: 1

    "30 people went deaf during the manufacturing of this car. Enjoy!"

    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
  105. Hard to prove it does anything by AB3A · · Score: 1

    Realistically, there is no way to prove that this system does anything at all. Weather pofiles are fickle things.

    However, I have a much more relevant question. This device is supposed to have a supersonic flow leaving the nozzel. OK, I can see how that would be. Let's look at another supersonic nozzel we are all familiar with: Rocket Engines.

    How far behind the Rocket Engine do the gasses go before they dissipate? Maybe a couple thousand feet? Clearly they're much more powerful than this anti-hail device. And this device is supposed to blast ionized air tens of thousands of feet in a mere few minutes? I smell something fishy here. Even if the ionized air trick works --the delivery system looks bogus to me.

    --
    Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
  106. But very effective against passenger airliners by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    In addition, the sonic cannon was found to be quite effective in crashing passenger jets cruising well within range overhead at only 30,000 feet. The paint chips falling at high speed were found to be damaging to the car's clear coating and the falling passengers often created dangerous delays during the morning commute. Fortunately, the technology was sold before these findings became public.

  107. They nearly wiped out an English village in 1952.. by celerityfm · · Score: 1

    Artificial rain making operations may have caused a storm that nearly wiped out an English village in 1952.

    I dunno guys this sounds kinda scary. I would be kinda apprehensive of the Nissan dealer down the street owning one of these. Wouldn't you?

    --
    ...unfortunately no one can be told what The Mat^H^H^HGoatse is...they must experience it for themselves...
  108. Sonic-Cannon? by Spokehedz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it me, or does this thing sound like something the guys on Junkyard Wars or MythBusters would build?

    *Junkyard Wars Mode*

    Today's challenge is going to be all about Changin' the weather! We've assembled two teams of the finest... well, they do make cars and such... People on the planet to build:

    A Hail Prevention/Detection device!

    Our two teams have just 10 hours to build a device that can do something that mankind has been trying to do for centuries--do something about the weather, instead of just talking about it!

    *MythBusters Mode*

    Announcer: Tonight on Mythbusters... See if the old saying "I hope your face sticks like that" is entirely possible--using LN2! And later on, Adam and Jamie build something to deal with that pesky weather.

    *** Later On ***

    Adam: Jimmy--

    Jimmy: Yes Adam?

    Adam: Have you ever talked about the weather?

    Jimmy: Yea, on a couple of my more 'memorable' dates...

    Adam: well, wouldn't it be something if we could do something about the weather, instead of just talk about it?

    Jimmy: It might be... who knows--I might have been to get into that guy--I mean, girl's pants if I could have stopped the sun from shining, so he couldn't have seen me...

    Adam: I'm not talking about no namby-pamby rain here... I'm talking about HAILSTONES here, baby!

    Jimmy: Oh god... not another Sonic-Cannon, Adam. We've built 35 of them already--and we've only been on the air for 20 episodes...

  109. Re:this is so off topic, but it's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahahahahaha. That is funny.
    For those afraid of tubgirl, this is nothing disgusting.
    It's a male cheerleader enthusiastically rining a bell. The angle of the camera makes it look like he's jacking off. It's hillarious.

  110. Dear god, Mods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear god, mods! interesting? Informative?! Try Funny!

  111. Kate Bush's "Cloudbusting" video... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone else think of the cloudbusting machine from Kate Bush's music video of this song?

  112. h0 h0 h0 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    +1 interesting so far... sir, my hat is off to you.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  113. unshieldable? by mattr · · Score: 1

    Seriously this sounds like a bad idea, think of all the ill will you generate! Anyway I wonder if it is impossible to use an amplitude reversed wave to shield horizontal propagation of the boom, like sound-cancelling earphones. Then remembered the U.S. supposedly experimented with sonic weapons but (supposedly) gave up because it propagated in all directions and backfired on the troops. (Of course robots or air drops could deliver them so this could be apocryphal). I'd be surprised if neighbors couldn't sue to get them to stop these explosions, unless they are really in the boonies.

  114. But what happens after you drive off the lot? by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not a very good solution. It only protects cars in the devices' vicinity. But once you buy the car what's to protect it then? A real solution would be one that protected the car at all times. More resilient glass and body panels. And paint that can withstand hail strikes. I guess that car makers don't really care what happens once you've bought the car.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  115. Yeah, cause there are a lot of birds... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    out for a leisurely flight in the middle of a hailstorm.

  116. Dangerous Precident by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if this could work ( which I seriously doubt ), is there any thought given to the ramifications of messing with natural processes?

    while *we* may have no use for them, they are part of nature, and do play a part in what goes on.

    Once we start screwing with the 'way of things', we are just asking for troubles we cant even foresee as of yet.

    And not I'm not a 'tree hugger', I just worry about the caviler attitude, ' well if we don't like it, today, we will just change nature to suit us'....

    Just look at the great dustbowl in the Midwest US if you don't think our seemingly unimportant actions can have drastic effects decades later...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Dangerous Precident by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you even read the article? This is the ninth one installed in the United States. There are 400 world wide, ... its primary use is to protect crops...

      And you think it doesn't work? How'd they sell 400 of the things? When's the last time you saw an apple with hail damage? Did you think it had just stopped hailing?

      As for changing nature, sweet jeebus, we're humans we change nature to suit us all the time, or did you think crops just naturally formed in large patches of ground? You're surfing the net, if you have a CRT monitor you have electrons shooting out into your face right now. Did you think that someone just found it on the beach?

      The basic principle is that nature is not as fragile as it's portrayed. I don't think shooting a couple of shock waves into the air is going to cause any irreparable damage, and if we didn't screw with nature occasionally we would still be sitting in caves, eating berries and grubs.

    2. Re:Dangerous Precident by nytmare · · Score: 1

      This is the ninth one installed in the United States. There are 400 world wide, ... its primary use is to protect crops... And you think it doesn't work? How'd they sell 400 of the things? Thousands of people buy penis-enlargement pills, so what's your point?

    3. Re:Dangerous Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People buy things that don't work all the time.

      Take a look around in your local mall and you'll see how well the average diet pill works.

      Hell, the U.S. government is spending millions on a missile defence system that can't even hit missiles. Once again, the effectiveness of a system isn't always a factor in whether people are willing to spend money on it.

    4. Re:Dangerous Precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you think it doesn't work? How'd they sell 400 of the things? When's the last time you saw an apple with hail damage? Did you think it had just stopped hailing?

      You know, most of us don't know what hail damage looks like. I often see apples with odd bits of damage (little "scars" and the like). Who knows where that came from? It could just as easily be hail damage for all I know.

    5. Re:Dangerous Precident by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 1

      Wait...

      So those penis enlargement pills don't work?

  117. In other news... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose this will drive neighborhood pooches nuts every time it fires up. This could be a Good Thing if you're not keen on dogs leaving liquid donations on your tires or fender during hailstorms.

    I know! Let's dub the thing the 'W.C. Field(s) Generator!'

    I think I'll go take my meds now... ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  118. Howabout a good old-fashioned carport? by Old+Sparky · · Score: 0

    Sounds like Nissan is making too much money!

  119. A Good Reason for This by McLuhanesque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last year, Nissan incurred hail damage to tens of thousands of new vehicles waiting for transport outside of their plant in (I think) Tennessee. The entire inventory was auctioned off to dealers are rock bottom prices (even for wholesale). I would expect that the dealers fixed up the hail damage and subsequently sold the cars. However, it meant a loss of millions of dollars of revenue to Nissan USA.

    This device is a small and worthwhile investment, even if there is only one hailstorm in the next decade.

  120. Equally effective if Nissan will pay ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the costs is as follows:

    1) set me up in the penthouse suite of the tallest, poshest hotel in the area requiring hail protection. (This increases the proximity to the offending clouds); and

    2) for a week provide me with the areas most attractive virgins who will be sacrificed to my sexual desires. (Sacrificing virgins is a time honoured way of effecting positive change in one's environment.)

    Theoretically plausible (in a New Age/Noble Savage sort of way), environmentally neutral, low noise levels, and relatively inexpensive (compared to the cost of say a 140 acre roof).

    In any case, I think it's worth trying at least once or twice. Let me know, Nissan.

  121. Mr. Misty by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

    So if this works, instead of my car getting hail damage, it'll just get a Mr. Misty headache?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  122. My questions are by _mythdraug_ · · Score: 1

    1) Why would the system need to include "a steel shelter structure"?
    2) Could someone evaluate the logic in this statement, "Supersonic bangs have no effects on animals."?

  123. Oh well, no bird droppings either by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

    I'm sure aiming giant ultra-sonic boom-boxes up at the sky SOUNDED like a good idea to someone, but I suspect every bird and bat in the area will be pretty unhappy.

    OTOH, maybe the UFO's that pass overhead will come down and buy something.

  124. Thank God! by Boyceterous · · Score: 1

    All of the birds in my neighborhood will get rid of have their kidney stones!

  125. Berries and grubs by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Sounds good to me. Man does way too much damage around here as it is.

    Now we are off into space, to spread the devastation around a bit.

    And no, i still dont buy that the devices work, regardless of what some propaganda says. Lots of useless products sell.. Great marketing can do wonders. can even make you buy a rock and call it a 'pet'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Berries and grubs by CelloJake · · Score: 1

      Go eat your berries and grubs if it sounds so good. If you actually take the side suggested by the parent post, then I don't expect to see a reply. Since using your computer would apparently conflict with your philosophy. By the way, you should probobly just starve to death. Who knows what kind of damage you would be doing to the environment by depriving it of a few berries and shrubs.

  126. Aliens? by Master_Wu · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to be there when the aliens come to retaliate for us firing our "primitive" sonic cannon at them. I don't think those cars are insured against alien invasion.

    --
    Wine, music and cinema are the three great creations of humanity. -T'Ian Han
  127. Buy your own from ThinkGeek! by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Here.

    And yes, they do actually work quite well.
    My cousin had one (got it for free somewhere) and we were taking turns knocking ornaments off the christmass tree with it this past december, from a different room.

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  128. Now they've gone too far by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Jesus

    I thought that was your sig, not some vulgar uttering as part of your comment. Cuz, this is exactly what I was thinking - sonic booms into the heavens? What would Jesus say. "Wouldn't a fucking roof be cheaper..." uh-oh... don't want to piss off The Big Guy!

  129. New threat to new cars by radoni · · Score: 1

    ...falling bats, confused, dropping out of the sky and damaging cars.

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  130. I bet the FAA is thrilled by npistentis · · Score: 1

    So the plan is to fire disruptive sonic blasts 50,000 feet into the air in a one-mile arc? I can't even begin to imagine the turbulence this will cause...

    --
    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room!
  131. the only thing i want to know is... by hellmarch · · Score: 1

    ... does it blow up birds like the anti-tornado mircowave satellite does?

  132. Re:Environmental Impact? (Slightly OT) by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be a sonar operator.

    This effect is known as cavitation - it occurs because of a drop in pressure causing sea water to boil at sea temperature in the low pressure parts of the sound wave. It also occurs in front of ship's propellers, and is one way for submarines to detect surface vessels ("popping" sounds). Our frigate's propellers started cavitating at about 12 knots' speed.

    Submarines have propellers especially designed to avoid this, as their operation is based on stealth.

    The sound pressure from an active sonar dome can exceed 200 db due to the high density of water, and can kill divers in the vicinity of the vessel. A fellow operator inadvertently turned on the sonar while in harbour, killed some fish (luckily no divers were in the water at the time), and was relocated instantly.

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  133. First Impression by 1HandClapping · · Score: 1
    My first impression was "Yeah, right!"

    Then "Well maybe..."

    Then "Wouldn't be ironic if the cannon shattered all the windshields and they had to total the cars due to water damage."

    Now to RTFA...

  134. One step closer to the Thompson Harmonizer! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Seriously though, stuff like this really bothers me. While having a few of these on a continent probably won't do anything too disastrous, what will the unintended consequences be if they start becoming popular?

    Eric

    [The subject line is a reference to the novel Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, in which the U.S. government publicly announces the existence of the said machine, and all the wonderful benefits it will have, when in fact it is a weapon which can only cause destruction within the U.S.]

  135. It works. I have proof! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I took all speakers I could lay my hands on and put them on the roof of my house and then turned up the volume. It got pretty loud. And guess what... no hail for as long as the device worked and as long as I could hold off the neighbors and the police with me trusty shot gun.

    But test prove that if make lots of noise it will not hail. I plan on doing a longer-term study as soon as I get out. I am currently seeking funding and manpower to defend the project from the police and nasty neighbors.

  136. it's 120db, the plane is louder - and RTA! by caveat · · Score: 1

    120db at 50,000 feet is going to do nothing - the sound pressure from the engines will probably be a few orders of magnitude higher.

    You didn't RTFA anway - if you had, you'd know that it's one installation, to protect the nissan factory lot from hailstorms, not a sonic cannon in every car (well, some stereo systems put out way more than 120db...).

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  137. Clean up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what are they going to do about the resulting guts from exploding seagulls/crows/birds flying above?

  138. Gotta be kidding... by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Informative

    A huge (glass) greenhouse for growing hydroponic tomatos near me (central Nebraska) has one of those annoying things. Whenever conditions are favorable for hail, the thing goes off, sounds like someone shooting a large shotgun every five seconds, which goes on for hour after hour. I can't think of anything more annoying. Everybody in town hates the thing, and in fact some redneck types (We are in Nebraska after all) think it's great fun to shoot their (real) shotguns in the air when this is going on, as the greenhouse blasts provide great cover.

    Perhaps metal shielding on a conveyor system to be pulled over would be much better to deal with. Maybe more expensive, but this is fucking ridiculous.

  139. Agl effects studied? by wfolta · · Score: 1

    Has anyone studied the effects of Agl on, say, people below?

    I was in CO last year for a snowboarding trip. They were experiencing a drought and so were seeding clouds every day. Coincidentally, the local guy who supplied oxygen for people who had contracted HAPE said his business was more than doubled from previous years.

    I know, I know, coincidence does not prove a cause, but was just wondering if Agl was spread in such quantities in daily cloud seeding that it could be inhaled by people and cause problems.

    1. Re:Agl effects studied? by hailstop · · Score: 1

      The AgI wouldn't be inhaled, it would be ingested in the water. But even then the concentration of Ag is extemely low and you likely have more silver in your saliva. That said, I don't know what the exact concentration in Colorado is, because obviously there is more application over a longer period of time in one location. In winter time cloud seeding programs, monitoring is necessary, but you really need a lot of it before it becomes hazardous (for example in the Alberta project, the approximate concentration of AgI in the water is around 1% of the safe limits as defined by the EPA).

  140. This is not a new idea! by Camel+Light · · Score: 1

    As (2) other slashdotters have posted, systems such as the one used by Nissan have been used for years to protect crops. I live in an area with hundreds of acres of peach trees, and I can see one of those cannons from my office window as I type. Just because many of you haven't heard of 'em, doesn't mean they don't work. It's incredibly old tech! Get away from the screens and walk around under the daystar guys! ;-)

  141. Cheaper Alternative? by a1cypher · · Score: 1

    Not sure if this thing actually does, but it sounds to me like this cannon would cost quite a bit of coin. Perhaps it would be cheaper to cover the lot with a tent-like canvas roof? Hail would roll off leaving the cars undammaged. Requires no fancy technology, no electricity, and keeps the cars clean and dry.

  142. Obligatory Simpsons reference... by ktulu1115 · · Score: 1

    ...Remember the episode when Bart lined up the 20 or so string of megaphones together at the police station?

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons reference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When do you expect the ringing will stop?"

      (Damn, and I misspelled "operating". D'oh!)

  143. no, no, you got it all wrong by ajagci · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is "cat-ions", i.e., ionized cats, not "cations". If you shoot millions of ionized cats into the stratosphere, it does prevent hail storms from forming (but you do have to contend with falling cats).

    1. Re:no, no, you got it all wrong by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > but you do have to contend with falling cats

      Well, I guess that means it's raining cats, so all we need now are the dogs.

  144. Could be a Disaster Area concert? by Clod9 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like the kind of technology that Disaster Area could make use of.
    Just figure a way of modulating it, plug it into the preamp, and let loose!

  145. Ford implemented something kind of similar... by Shoten · · Score: 1

    They use it to pre-empt the formation of cars that don't suck :)

    --

    For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
  146. sonic wave? by kertong · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can use a 20hz tone and just accidentally aim it at the nearby Honda facility. :)

    Brown noise, anyone?

  147. Recycling by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That's why my pc is used. And I try to build what I need, when possible.

    I agree that a true luddite, or Amish wouldn't even go that far, but to live that sort of life isn't practical in this day and age. ( nothing else the taxman will come to collect your property ).

    But it doesn't mean you cant live responsibly and minimize your impact on the earth... And I don't feel that trying to modify weather ( be it successful or not ) qualifies as 'low impact'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  148. 1 Mile area effect, every 5 seconds by sPaKr · · Score: 1

    I LIKE IT

  149. Abandoning scientific theories, on the other hand- by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Anyway, a sucker is born every minute."

    Disproving good hard science takes a bit longer. Not just because of the effort involved, but because of the inertia of supposedly rational scientific thinkers -- just ask Barry Marshall:

    The peer response showed the same scepticism that greeted Warren's initial observations, and for a number of years the majority of the medical profession dismissed the hypothesis. Despite this, the Perth team continued to gather evidence of their theory, dramatically in one case. Deciding that the best way to prove the findings was to show exactly what happened when infected with H. pylori, Marshall swallowed a culture of the bacterium. A week later, he began suffering acute symptoms of gastritis, and biopsies revealed that he had developed both infection with H. pylori and severe acute gastritis. Fortunately, the sequel was a successful case of "Physician, heal thyself"!


    If this has been in use since the 1980s, and if it has prevented the formation of hail as it claims, then the evidence should be available for people to see. And if that evidence shows that it does, in fact, prevent hail formation, then there's obviously something working.

    Given the number of years this has been in service in New Zealand and the like, it should be possible to find evidence of it working or not working -- through the absence or presence of hail in the general region where the device is used, along with the absence or presence of hail in the local area immediately near where the device is (with some accounting for the effect of wind blowing hail one way or the other).

    Not all things that work in ways that science doesn't understand are pseudoscience, and not all commonly-accepted scientific principles are not. The "hard" part of hard science is where we constantly re-evaluate our own view of how things work.

    In short, give this a chance. I can understand people being fooled in the short run, but since people have used things like this since the 80's, they must keep using 'em for some reason. Maybe they don't work and the folks just want to get their money's worth! But until you go to the source of the data and examine it critically, how can you know, regardless of how good your understanding of current science is?
  150. But what if it works? by oboylet · · Score: 1

    This is a little troubling. Suppose it works -- I am not an environmental scientist -- but isn't weather necessary? Most "disasters" have some serious ecological import. Floods, wildfires, hurricanes, and earthquakes all serve ecological purposes. Wildfires, in particular, clean out underbrush in forests. Decades of putting out small wildfires as soon as they sparked resulted in serious buildup of underbrush (=fuel). Eventually we had huge fires that more much more difficult to contain. Should we want people to prevent hail? What ecological purpose does hail serve? I really don't know, I'm asking here.

  151. UN says It's bunk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UN organization WMO says:

    "In recent years anti-hail activities using cannons to produce loud noises have re-emerged. There is neither a scientific basis nor a credible hypothesis to support such activities."

    at http://www.wmo.ch/web/arep/wmo_statem_wm.html

  152. Already used for fruit by swordfishBob · · Score: 1

    Where I grew up these were used to protect fruit trees.

    Wait a minute... they used the gas canons (very loud boom) to scare birds away. They used rockets to spray crystals into the clouds to prevent hail.

    I wonder if anyone pointed a canon upward??

    I wonder what happens when a rocket falls on a car..

    I wonder if many birds were hit by rockets..

    --
    -- All your bass are below two Hz
  153. Good lordy, where are the environmentalist wackos? by sllim · · Score: 1

    I have no opinion whatsoever on if this works or not. But I am thoroughly convinced that this thing would suck to live within a few miles of.

    Seriously, isn't this why we keep those environmentalist whack jobs around? To protest stuff like this? 120 decibles? Damn... I wonder if it presents a cancer risk....

    I want one, what an efficient way to piss off the neighbors.

  154. There is a long history . . . by vortexau · · Score: 1
    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  155. What about a roof? by overworked+underpaid · · Score: 1
    At first, I thought this is a really cool idea.

    But perhaps a low-tech solution might be more sensible? As a victim of automobile hail damage, it would be great to have a preventative. A carport would do the job nicely.

  156. Re:What a Crock -- "cars remain vunerable". by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Those car damage examples are a recurring feature in this area, although none spring to mind just recently.
    Some company once marketed an inflatable car roof protector, similar to an air-mattress! It was ONLY meant to be attached to stationary vehicles.

    Storms in the last month have caused dwelling window breakages through hail action.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"