Slashdot Mirror


Toy Penguins and Male Egos Drove Linux Acceptance

An anonymous reader writes "Germany's local and city councils have been pioneering the migration from Windows to Linux. Now, one of the IT staff behind one move has revealed how they persuaded workers to accept the changes. Stuffed toy penguins and Linux t-shirts helped to create an open-source love-in at the council offices, and they got a senior chairwoman to demonstrate the new system to the troops. Male ego stopped anyone claiming that Linux was difficult to use, once they'd seen that the 'weaker sex' could master it :)"

548 comments

  1. "the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Glad to see Germany's just as progressive as it was back in the day. /sarcasm

    1. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Glad to see Germany's just as progressive as it was back in the day. /sarcasm

      Hey, they're making progress!

      At least they didn't finish the demo by invading Poland.

    2. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by saforrest · · Score: 1, Informative

      Glad to see Germany's just as progressive as it was back in the day.

      You know, maybe the fact that 'weaker sex' was in quotes means it was meant sarcastically?

      And hey, Germany was ahead of the game back in the Nazi era. They actually gave women medals for having babies!

    3. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Damn! I knew we forgot something!

    4. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by wrp103 · · Score: 3, Informative

      To be fair, the 'weaker sex' comment isn't from the article, but from the /. blurb. In fact, the article uses the term "powerful women".

      The article does, however, mention male ego after having seen a woman use the system.

    5. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know it was meant as funny but since a lot of people won't know:
      germany is rather more progressive than the US nowadays (gay marriage, prostitution, drugs, not falling for government lies etc)

    6. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by shatteredpottery · · Score: 1

      I think Ambrose Bierce's term was more accurate: the "unfair sex".

      --

      A witty saying is worth nothing - Voltaire

    7. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad to see Americans have just as much of a sense of humour as they did back in the day.

    8. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the hell is the parent offtopic when none of the others are dude you are bumming when this comes up for meta mod......

    9. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by FreakWent · · Score: 1

      Perhaps their government is so advanced it doesn't even NEED to lie to them?

    10. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by galvingalvin · · Score: 0

      haha, very funny indeed!

    11. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by galvingalvin · · Score: 1

      ahh, right now the socialdemocrat / grune government in germany has a mere 38% of voters supporting them. Which means, there are chances they are thinking about how to advance their government skills a little bit. see http://www.zdf.de/ZDFde/inhalt/3/0,1872,1020771,00 .html

    12. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >And hey, Germany was ahead of the game back in the Nazi era

      Yes, it's amazing how well they emulated the Bush regime so many years before his time.

    13. Re:"the 'weaker' sex?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a cheap, stereotypical joke. Obviously you are totally out of touch with the new Germany of the 21st century.

      If there are any further such jokes, 100 Slashdot readers will be taken out and shot!

  2. Theres a name for this.... by eddiegee · · Score: 5, Funny

    and it called MARKETING!!!

    1. Re:Theres a name for this.... by djeaux · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Marketing is something Linux needs. Of course, that's the weak point for a lot of open source.

      Tux toys & t-shirts sound trivial, but they loosen people up about something that a lot of non-tech types think is "hard". Setting up the "sexist" argument ("Even the women can use this OS") is even appropriate if that's what it takes to make decision-makers come around.

      <OFFTOPIC>

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    2. Re:Theres a name for this.... by trp642 · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the best solution is the least technical. When I walk into the local CompUSA, all I see is Microsft marketing everywhere.

      Perhaps if the average Joe saw Tux and cute Linux posters everywhere, you'd see more acceptance.

      I think IBM has the right idea with their new Linux TV ads.

    3. Re:Theres a name for this.... by robslimo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...and damned good marketing too.

      Somehow it leaves me feeling a little uneasy, though. I bet I'd be influenced by the same or similar tactics, even though I've read this article. It leaves my ego a bit worse for the wear to know that I (hell, we!) am so easily swayed by savvy marketing techniques.

      Example: even if janet jackson winds up paying fines for her Super Bowl stunt, I'll bet she gets exactly what she intended in terms of sales and publicity. The people she pissed off were never her customers anyway.

    4. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and they got a senior chairwoman to demonstrate the new system to the troops"

      Sex sells. A tight tux shirt certainly helps.

    5. Re:Theres a name for this.... by melstav · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Damnably effective marketing.

      The article spends a fair amount of time talking about how they dealt with their proverbial "sticks in the mud" and talking about a few of the benefits of running linux vs. Windows, and then finishes up with the following paragraph:


      Late on Tuesday, Microsoft issued a patch for a vulnerability in its Windows software that could be used to unleash a virus even more devastating than MyDoom. This patch should be installed by anyone running Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP or Windows Server 2003.
    6. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Despite all the claims of 'monopoly' scarcely anyone steps back and REALLY analyzes why open source hasn't taken hold. And the answer inevitably leads to little or no marketing. A good product that no one knows about won't be used.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    7. Re:Theres a name for this.... by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's true, but part of the reason that Open source doesn't go in for marketing is that that's not the point. It's software to solve a specific problem, and if it solves other people's problems, so much the better. Marketing will potentially help the end users become aware of the software, but it really doesn't do the software any good or harm if people know about it or not.

      Commercial software on the other hand, is simply to make money for companies. This is not a bad thing; simply the way the market works. The fact that it solves a problem is simply a means to an end. Marketing is definitely essential here, since it increases sales.

    8. Re:Theres a name for this.... by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      The people she pissed off were never her customers anyway

      Not exactly true. I think the people she pissed off were her VERY customers, well atleast most of them, otherwise who would give a damn.

      I was least bothered by the halftime show, but I am not her customer. Infact I can't even name a single song of hers.

      Belive me there are lots of smart and educated people in this world who have better things to do than bitch about a half time show of a football match.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    9. Re:Theres a name for this.... by jafac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't blame the marketer for putting himself in the marketee's mindframe.

      The sexist attitude exists in the males they're trying to convince. Not necessarily the marketer. The technique was actually trying to change this perception by preying on the mistaken attitude.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    10. Re:Theres a name for this.... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      Belive [sic] me there are lots of smart and educated people in this world who have better things to do than bitch about a half time show of a football match.


      Yeah, but unfortunately, none of these people are on television 24/7...

    11. Re:Theres a name for this.... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder if it would help the decision makers to know that not only does my 8 yr old girl use linux, she prefers mandrake over fedora. Not that it is saying much, but she installed and updated Mandrake 9.2 this weekend with very little guidance. If she can do it, so should any grown man. Man, I beam with pride everytime I see my little girl use the command line.

      --
      ymmv
    12. Re:Theres a name for this.... by jihema · · Score: 1

      Marketing costs money. Can the customer accept that 100% of the price he pays is marketing (and a little tech support in some cases) ?

      --
      JMA
    13. Re:Theres a name for this.... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      Open source doesn't need marketing, because it doesn't matter all that much to open source whether end users use it. The point of open source is to solve your local problem better with the help of like-minded people.

      On the other hand, companies selling solutions based on open source projects do need marketing, because they do actually have to get otherwise uninterested end users interested. Of course, they seem to be doing pretty well at just that.

    14. Re:Theres a name for this.... by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, its not trying to change it, its trying to take advantage of it. Akin to the traditional Republican technique for gathering Southern White votes in America. Appeal to racism.

      And how do you think this would rub those that do not have the same shortcomming? Such as women? or non-chauvanistic men?

    15. Re:Theres a name for this.... by diersing · · Score: 1
      With IBM funding the 'linux kid' this could start to change in the US.

      I wish OSS had better merchandising, the current crop of SuSE hats/shirts is weak and I'd love to sport the lizard to help promote them.

    16. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

      I almost jumped out of my seat when I saw a real-live commercial for Linux. But sadly it was marketed toward business. It was more of an 'awareness' ad. Anyone who knew nothing about Linux before the ad probably still knows nothing. For all they know Linux is a little boy with blond hair.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    17. Re:Theres a name for this.... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Hey, I resemble that remark. That's an insult to CS100 students. :)

    18. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can tell why you went the Anonymous Coward route...

      But yes, user friendliness is also a problem. Even the most ardent Mandrake lovers acknowledges that XP is easier to use.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    19. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *lends you a </i>*
      Belive me there are lots of smart and educated people in this world who have better things to do than bitch about a half time show of a football match.

      But, you gotta look at it this way: ~80%+ of the people that have any interest in football at all are fundamentalist rednecks, and gospel spewing black people (I have more respect for the former).

      The rednecks... They can hardly even stand to look at their wives' nipples, let alone some black singer's pierced nips on TV. (during their sacred football game, no less)

      The smart people? They probably took a moment to admire her boobie, then they got on with their lives. The religious black people? They said "daaaaam, nice titty", realized that it wasn't a very big deal, and got on with their lives.

      Who have you seen complaining about it? Old white men. I mean, they're fucking ancient; and they're probably mad that they can't get "it" up anymore/wish they could get a set of boobies like hers for their own personal usage.

      Personally (being a relatively smart white male)... Well... "My answer is bring them on."
    20. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Teancom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To see a woman demonstrating software? I mean, I assume they didn't put her on the stage and say thinks like "Hey! *Even* women can go this!". It was a 'by example' thing. So the women and non-chauvanistic men would be offended...why?

    21. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, it was a costume malfunction.

    22. Re:Theres a name for this.... by netsharc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fascinating to hear. Does installing Mandrake require knowledge of partition tables? I think so, so she does understand how that bit of logic works? Smart kid.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    23. Re:Theres a name for this.... by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      She just took the defaults.

      --
      ymmv
    24. Re:Theres a name for this.... by z00z · · Score: 2, Funny
      and it called MARKETING!!!

      And what did MARKETING say?

    25. Re:Theres a name for this.... by arkanes · · Score: 3, Funny

      *sob* She's going to use IE when she grows up!

    26. Re:Theres a name for this.... by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      You should be proud.

      I've got a 7 year old daughter, she lives with her mum and the only computer in the house is running Windows XP. I've been toying with the idea of getting her a PC and installing Fedora on it for her.

    27. Re:Theres a name for this.... by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And dependency hell that exceeds .dll hell...
      Dependancies are resolved by programs like apt-get. Apt-get is available on red hat nowadays (and probably mandrake).
      And a very inconsistent and often difficult application install process...
      its pretty consistant - use rpm's for everything if you want to. If not ./configure ; make ; make install normally does the trick.
      And applications for general consumer and business use rather than just for developers...
      I'm a general consumer and i never use any other platform other than at/for college (vb is part of the course
      And driver / peripheral issues...
      unless people play with random hardware (which office workers etc do not, you dont get hardware problems - just check before you buy/download
      And remember, in the corporate world, the only people who are allowed to install are trained anyway - they can fathom out how to compile something - companies don't install new software every week, so its not as if there would be much research involved.

    28. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Malek+the+Damned · · Score: 1

      Well, considering this is an industry dominated by males (why, I'm not sure, I know some real g33k chicks, but very few), this is a good marketing approach AFAIC.

      All the non-tech guys out there see (keep in mind, this is in marketing-thought) that this whole linux thing isn't just some bunch of hairy, sweaty guys sitting around drinking mountain dew and grepping their lives away. Look, girls can use this too! And they _like_ it! If you use this OS, girls will like you too! Casually drop "sed" and "awk" in a conversation, and you're good as LAID! What a deal!

      Sexist sounding, yes, but it's the origin of every marketing campaign (think Coke) for the last 30-odd years. Sex sells.

    29. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >and it called MARKETING!!!

      IMG of a boothbabe wearing Linux t-shirt shuffed with Tux dolls...

      Sorry, must go take medication.....

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    30. Re:Theres a name for this.... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      Congrats on bringing your yung'un up with a proper knowledge of computing. (i. e. there is more than just windows out there) Most of my college classmates have no idea about open source. My mom's friend has custody of her 8 y/o grandson, and they don't have the money to buy computers, so he gets my hand me downs. Next time the kid has a birthday I'm going to make sure the system I give him can dual boot in addition to having plenty of open source windows software installed.

    31. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Aelfy · · Score: 2, Funny

      They were convincing IT people, and the plan was perfectly conceived:

      The T-Shirt doubles their wardrobe and allows them to go another fortnight without doing the laundry.

      The stuffed toy is for them to give to a cute girl as valentines day is coming up (not that that would work!)

      In fact, using a nice looking saleswoman, she probably got most of the stuffed toys right back as "thoughtful gifts" from the geeks. Money saved!

    32. Re:Theres a name for this.... by starm_ · · Score: 1

      I agree. Linux doesn't need marketing. Just the fact that it costs 0$ is enough to make people try it.

      The problem is when they try it and its so difficult tu use because of the issues you mentioned.

      I think it just needs to mature a little before it becomes a general public thing. I'm sure in two years a lot of the issues will have been fixed and some Linux distros will be has easy to use as windows or OSX.

    33. Re:Theres a name for this.... by be-fan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      And dependency hell that exceeds .dll hell...
      ---------
      This is an old, and utterly irrelevent argument in this day and age where pretty much everybody is using something like APT or Yum.

      And a very inconsistent and often difficult application install process...
      ----------
      The Windows installer is utterly inconsistent and difficult compared to something like KPackage or Synaptic.

      And applications for general consumer and business use rather than just for developers...
      -----------
      This is actually a valid argument. Try sticking to these instead of making stupid, irrelevent, outdated ones!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    34. Re:Theres a name for this.... by XO · · Score: 1

      Certainly smart, but probably not too out-of-the-ordinary. When I was 10, I was using Unix System III and had ported a few things that were built on SysV or other Unixes, to run on the non-TCP/IP capable System III box that I had access to..

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    35. Re:Theres a name for this.... by XO · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dependency Hell is NOT negated by APT and Yum.

      Example (not cut and pasted, just typed in by memory.. this is what happened to my system a few weeks ago):

      apt-get update; apt-get upgrade ...
      package-A requires package-B-2.20
      downgrading package-B-2.30 to package-B-2.20
      package-C requiers package-B >= 2.30
      uninstalling package-C..
      uninstalling everything that depends on package-C..

      I ended up with over fifty things that I had to reinstall, to get my computer back in order after THAT fuckup.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    36. Re:Theres a name for this.... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Wish I could have seen Daryl's face when that was shown durring the superbowl! Also wish that the "linux kid" was more of a self-confident, capable but young bussiness type rather than a child prodegy type.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    37. Re:Theres a name for this.... by denks · · Score: 2, Funny

      Taking this a bit further

      Put on 2 demonstrations in a workplace. In the first, get an attractive woman to give the Linux demo, hand out Linux T-shirts. Focus the demo on the usefulness of Linux and how it is free (as in beer).
      In the second demo, get an RMS clone to hold an installfest for the attendees personal computers. Focus the discussion on how you can hack the kernel, and how Linux is free (as in speech)

      Take a random sample of the workplace, send half to the first, half to the second and see which group will welcome a migration to Linux in their workplace and which will be scared off thinking that its too hard. I bet that the first group will come out thinking its a great idea, the second will think that its a step backwards.

      MS has shown us that its all about marketing. No matter what the quality of the product you are selling, if its marketed well people will believe that it is the best thing since sliced bread

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
    38. Re:Theres a name for this.... by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      You adult-chauvanist pig!

    39. Re:Theres a name for this.... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An appeal to racism (lacking an example, I assume you mean something like "the Blacks are taking all our money and jobs"?) is very different than what you are calling sexism here.

      To put it differently, is this out-and-out sexism, or is it just marketing a stereotype?

      A similar discussion took place here a few weeks ago when a woman accused salesmen of being sexist because she would be ignored in tech stores if her husband was present. The counterpoint was that the stereotype (as in learned behaviour by example, not discrimination) is that women are less interested and thus know less about technology and "geek toys".

      I know two women who can use Linux. TWO.

      As is mentioned in the adjacent post, if the product was marketed in a "Hey look! I can do this, and I'm a woman! A BLONDE woman, at that!" then that is sexism. But by having a woman carry out the demo as a professional it goes against the stereotype, the learned behaviour, and the message is all that much clearer. For those who don't have such a stereotype it is EXACTLY the same as having a man do the demo, except her voice probably doesn't carry quite as well :-)

      My 2 cents

    40. Re:Theres a name for this.... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Debian doesn't do stuff like that without asking your permission. It'll err on the side of not doing anything. Certainly, there can be packaging bugs, but Windows installers have "packaging" bugs too. Waiting a couple of days for the exceedingly occasional packaging bug to be resolved is not what I'd call dependency hell.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    41. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Krafty+Koder · · Score: 1

      Heck - my two year simply LOVES my tux wallpapers, to such an extent that she refuses to go to bed unless she's got her cuddly penguin with her. Gods honest truth!

      Fast forward several years, and my future 8 year old daughter will be telling me "awww - dad. Why are using Pico - that sucks big time. You should try vi"

      Dad meanwhile, looks on bemused as said 8 year old downloads, compiles and runs the latest open source variant of Medal of Honour.
      :-)

    42. Re:Theres a name for this.... by TKinias · · Score: 3, Interesting

      scripsit XO:

      Dependency Hell is NOT negated by APT and Yum. [...] I ended up with over fifty things that I had to reinstall, to get my computer back in order after THAT fuckup.

      Um, you've got a seriously FUBAR apt configuration if that's happening to you. I would suggest unfscking your /etc/apt/preferences for a start...

      Seriously, the only time this sort of thing happens is when you're running Unstable or, especially, mixing Unstable packages into a Stable or Testing system -- and then you're intentionally putting yourself on the bleeding edge. The one exception I can recall is the recent and well-documented problem with the switch to GTK2-based Galeon; that only affected Testing, too, not Stable. And it was resolved in a few days; we just used Firebird in the interim.

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    43. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

      Just the fact that it costs 0$ is enough to make people try it

      And who will make them aware of this fact?

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    44. Re:Theres a name for this.... by XO · · Score: 1

      it certainly does not, when the package server tells you that the downgraded version is newer than the older one with the bigger version number, or something.

      it did all that automatically, i just ran apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; and came back about two hours later to find a metric assload of software gone.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    45. Re:Theres a name for this.... by cduffy · · Score: 1

      it did all that automatically, i just ran apt-get update; apt-get upgrade; and came back about two hours later to find a metric assload of software gone.

      dist-upgrade, maybe; upgrade never removes packages.

    46. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can just picture those German female Linux users waring a 'got root?' T-shirt

    47. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Backups are your friend.

      --Apt will not remove packages just by doing apt-get upgrade, at least AFAIK. If you do ' apt-get install blah ' and some packages will be removed, it verbosely asks Y/N.

      --" apt-get dist-upgrade " OTOH, can be a nightmare. Definitely not recommended.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    48. Re:Theres a name for this.... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      The other guys are right. I've been a Debian user for quite awhile, and upgrade doesn't remove packages. dist-upgrade (which is something quite different) will, which is why you should only use it for, well, distribution upgrades...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    49. Re:Theres a name for this.... by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> as said 8 year old downloads, compiles and runs the latest open source variant of Medal of Honour

      and then proceeds to beat you're ass at it :)

    50. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While in a large sense I do agree, I nonetheless think it's going to be a help to desktop adoption. Just getting name recognition from TV in a lot of ways might act as a validator. Putting a whole new system on one's most expensive applience is a pretty daunting experience for a lot of people, and I think many of them would be reassured that their TV has told them that this Linux thing isn't just a toy used by geeks, but rather a real professional IBM thing. They might not yet know to ask for it, but if someone suggests it as a solution and explains what it is, it might give them the extra bit of confidence to try.

      Though in any case, even word of mouth seems to be doing pretty well. I'm finding it more common for people to mention thinking about using Linux - OK, not huge common, but the fact that it's turning up at all in conversation with non computer geeks is amazing to me.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    51. Re:Theres a name for this.... by autocracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, and how did you find out about Google? I've certainly never seen an ad. Do they make those?

      --
      SIG: HUP
    52. Re:Theres a name for this.... by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and? That would make any geek daddy proud! Smart and good at FPS...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    53. Re:Theres a name for this.... by dryeo · · Score: 1


      And dependency hell that exceeds .dll hell...
      ---------
      This is an old, and utterly irrelevent argument in this day and age where pretty much everybody is using something like APT or Yum.

      And a very inconsistent and often difficult application install process...
      ----------
      The Windows installer is utterly inconsistent and difficult compared to something like KPackage or Synaptic.

      Apt only works if the package you want to install is in the distributation. As an example I picked up a copy of Wordperfect 8. Had a hell of a time figuring out what packages the tarball needed and getting it working.
      My son has an old P200 with limited ram so I stuck slink on it. Seems most everything won't work as it depends on newer libs and apt crashes if I point it at stable. Also on a 26.4 connection it is not that easy to upgrade little well dist-upgrade.
      A lot of programs, libraries etc also depend on newer versions of gcc to compile so configure, make, make install also fails
      Most precompiled software just seems to have a script for installation which doesn't always work very good, none have ever added the app to the menu. At that even after running Debian on and off
      for years I'm still not sure where the menu is kept.
      I barely ever boot to Linux now as it changes so often and I no longer feel like spending so much time relearning where things are and how they work.
      Example I updated my mouse to a ps2 type and had to reconfigure X, got somewhat confused when I discovered that /dev was transitioning to a directory structure instead of a flat structure. Never did get the mouse working in a console.
      My other complaint is Linux is seeming too much like Windows. MS made a lot of bad decisions in their user interface and the only reason it caught on is due to forcing people to use it, too much of Linux seems to be following MS lead.
      If I wanted the Windows experience I'd run Windows
      Dave who's still happily runing OS/2

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    54. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      The people who freaked over two seconds of tit time but are not at all upset over horses farting on womens faces and grown men hitting each other, scratching their balls, spitting and cursing are just weird.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    55. Re:Theres a name for this.... by sparkdstr · · Score: 1

      lol. this 18 yr old girl tried to explain linux to her dad in more than theory, and the computer got kicked so hard the case was dented. whoops! guess not all little tech girls got tech old men. lol sparkdstr

    56. Re:Theres a name for this.... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Lossy text compression:

      rmv ll f th vwls!

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    57. Re:Theres a name for this.... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Bah ! You had it easy ! In my youth we had to etch our programs onto rom chips with battery acid and a paintbrush ! And we were happy for the paintbrush !

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    58. Re:Theres a name for this.... by chess · · Score: 1

      Sorry to come really late, but its not only simple marketing using gender cliches as many slashdotters propose in testosterone driven reasoning.

      Knowing Germany, Public Sector Employees and Workers Councils too well, Id say its evil genious marketing.

      You see, Public Sector and Workers Council is usually a guarantee _against_ change.
      In addition to that, the Workers Council is supposed to help employees if employers go to far - to put it neutrally.

      See the EVIL now?

      By showing off the - female - chairwoman of the workers' council, they shut off _any_ way to obstruct the adoption of Linux.

      Fing Brilliant, do not let MSFT know.

      chess

    59. Re:Theres a name for this.... by fatty_scoundrel · · Score: 1

      unfortunately, I don't think the "even women can use it" slogan would work well with feminist firms....

  3. Which one? by netglen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which distro of linux are they using?

    1. Re:Which one? by Hettch · · Score: 0

      I believe that would be GNU/ianDeb stable: 'Peep'

    2. Re:Which one? by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 0

      Prolly Souse. You know... Pig Linux.

      --
    3. Re:Which one? by maulwurf · · Score: 4, Informative

      according to ct-magazine they are using SuSE-Linux. german article: http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/34859

    4. Re:Which one? by jester42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are using SuSE according to this press release

    5. Re:Which one? by seriv · · Score: 1

      That would make sense, since SuSE is German. Not like they are going to use Red Flag Linux.

    6. Re:Which one? by azzy · · Score: 1

      SuSE is owned by Novell .. Novell is German? Since when?

      *ducks*

    7. Re:Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's SUSE not SuSE.

      Didn't you get the memo?

    8. Re:Which one? by pegr · · Score: 1

      "SuSE is owned by Novell .. Novell is German? Since when?"

      Ah, I see you've never had to compile and link your own NE2000 driver into the workstation shell or COMPSURF'ed a 40 meg hard drive overnight before... ;)

    9. Re:Which one? by azzy · · Score: 1

      You can tell all that just from my pedantry? Wow!

    10. Re:Which one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I thought the Germans had laws against religous zealots. And now they're doing business with them?!!!

      Oh, wait, Mormons, not $cientologists!

    11. Re:Which one? by NortWind · · Score: 1

      If SuSE is now SUSE, is YaST now YAST?

    12. Re:Which one? by DeborahArielPickett · · Score: 1
      It's SUSE not SuSE.
      From the article:
      "SUSE was looking to more effectively reach our business audience--capitalizing on our strengths as the pioneer in commercial Linux as well as our reputation as the Linux engineering experts," said Dr. Uwe Schmid

      Capitalizing indeed. I didn't realize that the letter "u" was one of SuSE's strengths.

  4. f'ing brilliant! by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not that it's a great sales tactic: "You don't need that wimpy ease-of-use"

    Gotta keep the spin "Easy enough for *her*, so you can certainly handle it."

    1. Re:f'ing brilliant! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Linux: Strong enough for a server, GUI balanced for a desktop.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:f'ing brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but does it have enough power for me, a manly man!

      man man - works
      man woman - doesn't

      wow, just like a guy.

      can linux go hunting too?

    3. Re:f'ing brilliant! by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I know there's gotta be a "Strong enough for a man..." joke in there somewhere...

    4. Re:f'ing brilliant! by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      apparently, several.

    5. Re:f'ing brilliant! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      Linux: Strong enough for a server, GUI balanced for a desktop.

      I nominate this as the official tagline of Linux.

    6. Re:f'ing brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux. Microsoft and SCO fear it. Do you?

    7. Re:f'ing brilliant! by Rysc · · Score: 1

      I think:

      Linux: Strong enough for a desktop, load balanced for a server.

      Would be more appropriate in any number of ways.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  5. booth girls by frankmu · · Score: 5, Funny

    so we need to send out troops of booth girls with Knoppix in hand to shame the microsofties into submission. they can stop by my office first.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:booth girls by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 3, Funny

      All I can say is for those booth girls is not "Micro" or "Soft" by any means.

      More like a HARD DRIVE.

      --
    2. Re:booth girls by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Get the right booth-babes and they won't be neither micro nor softies. /Props to Letterman for blatantly stealing his joke.

    3. Re:booth girls by Trigun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Although the term "SCSI" comes to mind as well.

    4. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya maybe if all you /. fags cyber them good, you can sweet talk them into it.

    5. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which pronounciation? The intended (sexy) or the common (scuzzy).

    6. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more like a box of kleenex you mean

    7. Re:booth girls by SheldonYoung · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A former company did a rather large booth a COMDEX a few years ago. They planned it a bit late so the more attractive of the Booth Marketting Persons were already obligated to other companies. One of the women was as much fun as a brick in the desert.

      The other woman had a great personality and eventually she stopped giving out post cards demonstrating a technical application to victi... potential customers. It was amazing how much more attentive the demonstratee was with her. I don't know if it's because she was a woman, evidence of the friendliness of the application or what, but it stuck.

      If you want to convert an entire company to swith to open source in one fell swoop get your secretary to install OpenOffice.

    8. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was sk-zee, not sexy

    9. Re:booth girls by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or we can try Alice's (from Dilbert) methodology: Instead of booth babes to attract people to your booth get RMS and/or Linus (Dilbert, Wally) to stand in front of Microsoft's booth wearing nothing but a string of floss.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    10. Re:booth girls by RLW · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Not funny. War is one thing but this goes to far. I bet this violates the Geneva convention.

    11. Re:booth girls by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "If you want to convert an entire company to swith to open source in one fell swoop get your secretary to install OpenOffice."

      And if you want her to actually *use* the software, install KOffice.

    12. Re:booth girls by maja33 · · Score: 1

      Well, I would respectfully decline your offer of RMS but Linus. . . .
      "Yes, yes, I will buy 14 copies of XP Pro, now give me Penguinboy!"

      --
      "It wasn't me, I didn't do it, I don't post, the bite marks still haven't healed from last time." Ryan/jrc
    13. Re:booth girls by urbazewski · · Score: 2, Interesting
      get your secretary to install OpenOffice.

      When Art Fry, the inventor of Post-It notes, first attempted to pitch the innovation at 3-M he received a lukewarm response. He then distributed samples to some 3-M secretaries who quickly found new uses for them . It's now one of the 5 top-selling office products.

      the history of the post-it note

      --
      foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
    14. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is cute. You bet he is much better looking in a floss string than any of you :P If you can't agree with me, send some pictures as evidence!

    15. Re:booth girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How would you know? You're probably so fat you havent seen it in years.

  6. weaker sex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are you talking about geek-kind here or what?

    some of us are pretty strong you know.

  7. Male ego driving Linux? by bad+enema · · Score: 4, Funny

    Where have I seen this before? :)

    1. Re:Male ego driving Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know Theo did Linux.

  8. One thing to remember by sirinek · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never underestimate the power of the booth babe. :)

  9. Reverse psychology... by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is hardly new... all it has ever taken to get a guy to do something is say something like "oh, if it's too heavy for you I can ask someone else"

    'cept for those of us who learned the game and call the bluff with "sure, go right ahead"

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    1. Re:Reverse psychology... by haystor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I went back to college after taking a few years off. I was amazed at the number of women using men they didn't even know to move their furniture. Women that would otherwise not have anything to do with these guys would just smile and ask, and it would be done.

      They were a bit miffed when I told them no.

      --
      t
    2. Re:Reverse psychology... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I always help -- I guess I "get" the concept that I can lift more than almost any woman -- something about testosterone and being a lumberjack in my youth.

      But if you can't lift more than they can, by all means send them along to somebody that can.

      Oh, and just because they are using a trick on you doesn't mean they don't need your help. Just smile and say "Sure, but next time just ask instead of playing the mind games." Being a jerk doesn't allow you to change behaviour -- or get dates for that matter.

    3. Re:Reverse psychology... by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually I tend to do what you recommend (say "just ask"). I am after all a rather big fellow. But if they use the blatant "poor wittle me can't do anything for myself" technique, I'm liable to be a jerk, yeah. (nor, for the record, do I want to date someone who pulls that shit :) )

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    4. Re:Reverse psychology... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, you don't want to date somebody who pulls that shit -- but you don't want every other women within earshot saying "asshole" under her breath :-)

      The "sure, but just ask" sends the dual message "not a sap" AND "not an ass".

    5. Re:Reverse psychology... by bad+enema · · Score: 1



      19 year old, very deprived CS male + 19 year old Arts female in revealing nightgown - 20 minutes of moving furniture = sucker out of me.

    6. Re:Reverse psychology... by el-spectre · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Good point, that...

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:Reverse psychology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, the opposite of that is when your husband pouts for a few hours after you just benched more than he did.... He got me back though, by holding the peanut butter jar out of my reach, the tall bastard.

    8. Re:Reverse psychology... by pyros · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was sitting out on my balcony at my last apartment hanging out with a friend from out of town. And some woman, admittedly attractive, pulled up in her truck and started moving in to a nearby apartment with her friend. Now, my frined and I did happen to glance at them a couple of times, but there was no conversation of any sort between us and the women, nor were we talking about them. Out of nowhere, she yells over up to us (I lived on the third floor) "Don't worry we'll move it all." Then when my wife arrived with groceries, and my friend and I go to help bring them in, this woman says to her "so that's how you get them to help, you have to give them food!" Now it's one thing to actually ask for help, thinking your looks will help. But to just get mad at a guy for being in the vicinity without jumping at the chance to help is just bitchy.

    9. Re:Reverse psychology... by NineNine · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      you don't want every other women within earshot saying "asshole" under her breath

      Actually, I do. Assholes get laid. "Nice guys" don't. Sorry.

    10. Re:Reverse psychology... by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1

      Sad but true. ;-)

    11. Re:Reverse psychology... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1
      I think it's called mistaken sense of entitlement. Likely garnered by having males (hopeful of a bone) do exactly that for them, all their lives.

      Products of their environment; do not judge them. Heh.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    12. Re:Reverse psychology... by DarkSarin · · Score: 1

      yeah, and it's even tougher--what would your wife say if she came home to find you helping the attractive woman move her stuff in? Your wife might understand, but only if you have a history of helping pretty much everyone who shows up.

      On the contrary, if that's an exception to the rule, you could end up in a heap o' ....you know.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    13. Re:Reverse psychology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something about testosterone and being a lumberjack in my youth.

      I'm a lumberjack and I'm OK,
      I sleep all night and I work all day.

    14. Re:Reverse psychology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were a bit miffed when I told them no.

      Behold, the typical /. virgin!

    15. Re:Reverse psychology... by stor · · Score: 1

      yeah, and it's even tougher--what would your wife say if she came home to find you helping the attractive woman move her stuff in? Your wife might understand, but only if you have a history of helping pretty much everyone who shows up.

      On the contrary, if that's an exception to the rule, you could end up in a heap o' ....you know.


      That's actually a damn good point. If I had a dollar for the number of times I've gone out of my way to (innocently mind you) help one woman and got another woman jealous as a result...

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    16. Re:Reverse psychology... by stor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      you don't want every other women within earshot saying "asshole" under her breath

      Actually, I do. Assholes get laid. "Nice guys" don't. Sorry.


      Speaking as a "nice guy" I call bullshit.

      Every woman will have a different set of criteria for finding you attractive or unattractive.

      I really ought to write a book or at least a HOWTO. In the meantime let me suggest two behaviours that will help:

      1. Honesty. This is a challenge: the most important thing is to be honest with yourself which is _really_ difficult. I'm lucky enough to have been with women who've told me honestly what I needed to improve on. I'm still working on it ;)
      2. Assertiveness. From my experience most (not all) women don't like a guy to be too submissive. They like a dude to have a spine. This doesn't mean you should be nasty and forceful, just don't be a doormat. Some women like to wear the pants in a relationship but most seem to not appreciate being forced into that position.

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    17. Re:Reverse psychology... by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, this is bull. I'm a nice guy and I've never found it got in the way of getting laid a lot - quite the reverse.

    18. Re:Reverse psychology... by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Honesty. This is a challenge: the most important thing is to be honest with yourself which is _really_ difficult. I'm lucky enough to have been with women who've told me honestly what I needed to improve on. I'm still working on it ;)

      Dude, I can help you, today I received this GREAT email that has PROVEN techniques for enlarging your penis! Seriously, just give me your email and I'll forward it to you!

    19. Re:Reverse psychology... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1

      Actually assertive guys get laid, be they assertive assholes or assertive nice guys.

    20. Re:Reverse psychology... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      My favorite response to such situations:

      "You're not cute enough to make up for your shitty attitude."

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    21. Re:Reverse psychology... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Actually assertive guys get laid, be they assertive assholes or assertive nice guys.

      I agree, but how many assertive nice guys have you met? (And I mean actually assertive, not just "not a doormat")

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    22. Re:Reverse psychology... by Titusdot+Groan · · Score: 1
      I agree, but how many assertive nice guys have you met? (And I mean actually assertive, not just "not a doormat")

      Well, not many is true. But they get laid a *lot* more than assertive assholes.

      Too bad I discovered how to be assertive after getting married :-)

  10. WHAT?!?!? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean you converted a group of people to Linux without shouting things like "RTFM!!!"???

    Maybe we should rethink our strategies...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:WHAT?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFLMAO ...... AMEN!!!!!!!

    2. Re:WHAT?!?!? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

      Well some people have tried selling linux gear with modles in the pictures...but it's not the same as having a nice looking woman at in installfest showing you how to install your software onto a hard drive. Any how smart women are sexy.

      --
      This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    3. Re:WHAT?!?!? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Right! We don't need cheesy airhead boothbabes, we need average normal women in business clothing with knowledge of the product.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:WHAT?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about cheesy airhead boothbabes in business clothing ?

    5. Re:WHAT?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about big muscular men? Any muscular /. nerds out there that like other men?

      That's what I'd rather see...

    6. Re:WHAT?!?!? by jred · · Score: 1

      You hear this all the time, but it's been a while since someone told me to RTFM. And I ask a lot of dumb questions.

      Maybe it's just the "neighborhoods" I hang out in...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  11. And so it goes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Toy penguins and males egos drove the agricultural revolution. Just another victory for the testosterone-fueled-penguin progress that's going to get us to Mars!

  12. Commercialism? by MoebiusStreet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This sounds suspiciously like how the world of commercial software works :o

    1. Re:Commercialism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux _is_ commerciel.
      Nobody has ever stated otherwise (not Linus, not RMS).
      You really need to understand the difference between properitary and commercial.

    2. Re:Commercialism? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      yeah well when you have a company (suse?) selling it commercially to them is that a surprise?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Commercialism? by Jotaigna · · Score: 0

      sometimes you have to fight fire with fire. We are intrested in technical details but, the other 99.9% of the ppl just want it to work and look cute. Linux can do all that together, but people should know it somehow.

      Late on Tuesday, Microsoft issued a patch for a vulnerability in its Windows software that could be used to unleash a virus even more devastating than MyDoom. This patch should be installed by anyone running Windows NT, Windows 2000, Windows XP or Windows Server 2003

      ..."the patch is called SP2"

      --
      "The quality of life is inversely proportional to the number of keys on your keyring."
    4. Re:Commercialism? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      If it's not commercial you're relying on people with nothing better to do than write software for you.

    5. Re:Commercialism? by CaptainTux · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Getting people to adopt anything new requires some commercialization and good marketing. Linux is no different. What it seems you're intimating here is that if Linux uses the same marketing techniques that commercial vendors use then it's somehow wrong and takes something away from Linux. It doesn't.

      The fact that vendors use commercial techniques to sell people on Linux does not take anything away from the fact that Linux offers it's users freedom, stability, and distance from vendor lock-in. Commercial marketing isn't unethical. Commercial marketing isn't bad. Using your taking away freedom from your installed user base is both.

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    6. Re:Commercialism? by MoebiusStreet · · Score: 1

      You read my implication correctly, but not my intent. If you'll excuse a bit of generalization, it seems to me that many open source supporters eschew anything that smacks of commercialism, which is (I think) exactly why someone bothered to post this story. My intent wasn't to cast aspersions on open source, but the other way around. I wanted to imply that open source needs to do this sometimes, so you shouldn't look down your noses at commercial organizations for the same sorts of things.

    7. Re:Commercialism? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      If it's not commercial you're relying on people with nothing better to do than write software for you.

      That's why IBM invested a billion dollars into linux developement? A lot of heavy lifting in linux is done on paid company time by professional programmers. How much of what's in Windows began life as a cheesey share-ware program or utility that was assimalated by BillGatus of borg?

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    8. Re:Commercialism? by TKinias · · Score: 1

      scripsit Rallion:

      If it's not commercial you're relying on people with nothing better to do than write software for you.

      This is a good example of why RMS doesn't like people to use ``commercial'' in distinction to ``free.'' Software can be commercial and free -- like the stuff IBM develops. The opposite of free is proprietary (or unfree).

      --
      In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
    9. Re:Commercialism? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Somebody always gets money out of it, even is the model isn't as simple as 'make program, sell to users.' Humans are not that altruistic. Or, usually, even that bored.

  13. The first rule of marketing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is to know your audience. Seems like the folks that put this together did.

  14. Geek girl? by kefoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    A woman who uses Linux? I'm in love.

    1. Re:Geek girl? by gimpimp · · Score: 1

      dont be in love man! there's loads of girls who use linux on tribe.net and orkut - but they're ugly as sin. /joke ;)

      --
      i wish i was but oh well
    2. Re:Geek girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get used to a woman who's only skin pigment comes from the slight ultraviolet radiation coming from a CRT.

      Hope you like the big life too.

    3. Re:Geek girl? by kfg · · Score: 1

      That would be why they're called the fairer sex.

      KFG

    4. Re:Geek girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A woman who uses Linux? I'm in love.

      Sorry. She got paid to use it. So your expenses on hookers will not go down.

    5. Re:Geek girl? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, my wife uses Linux and you can't have her. Besides, she already fell for that trick once.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    6. Re:Geek girl? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      or, they'll scare you away with the whips chains, and butter....

      ever notice a slight bdsm theme on tribe.net?

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    7. Re:Geek girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one wants your wife anyway. She's drop dead fugly.

    8. Re:Geek girl? by Bodhammer · · Score: 1
      --
      "I say we take off, nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure."
    9. Re:Geek girl? by Mandi+Walls · · Score: 1
      Sorry, your /. id is too low.

      --mandi

    10. Re:Geek girl? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Looked at your resume.

      Sorry, you're too young ;-P>.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    11. Re:Geek girl? by Sick+Boy · · Score: 1

      So I'm toally out of the running? Damn! Another lonely Valentine's day shall be my curse!

      --
      Does narcissism count as a hobby? --Shawn Latimer
  15. It's brilliant by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To rework a famous old saying, no-one ever went broke overestimating the impact of appealing to the male ego.

    That's brilliant marketing to use a female rep to demo a product to a bunch of men.

    A lot of companies would do well to follow that example, I think.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:It's brilliant by devphaeton · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      To rework a famous old saying, no-one ever went broke overestimating the impact of appealing to the male ego.

      That's brilliant marketing to use a female rep to demo a product to a bunch of men.

      A lot of companies would do well to follow that example, I think.


      and on that same token, every woman has a feminist buried deep inside her. Appeal to her inner feminist by telling her "women are superior men in every way" and she'll eat right out of your hand.

      This is no shit.

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
    2. Re:It's brilliant by temojen · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's brilliant marketing to use a female rep to demo a product to a bunch of men.

      A lot of companies would do well to follow that example, I think.

      You mean like beer companies?

    3. Re:It's brilliant by pegr · · Score: 4, Funny

      " Appeal to her inner feminist by telling her "women are superior men in every way" and she'll eat right out of your hand."

      Yup, sincerity is the hardest part. Once you can fake that, you're golden...

    4. Re:It's brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I see the connection! Linux is Free as in beer! No wait, that's not right.

    5. Re:It's brilliant by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

      Yes, just like beer companies.

      Remember the Simpsons episode with the Duff commercial? A couple of rowdy guys spray a group of protesting feminists with beer, and they all instantly transform into bikini-clad beach bimbos, holding signs that say "I'm easy!" and "Get me drunk!"

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  16. Women love Linux too :) by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.nccomp.com/images/linux-girl.jpg
    pic

    1. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      Now why couldn't I have met any of those obviously linux-loving women *before* I settled on marrying the slut from the poolhall?

    3. Re:Women love Linux too :) by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Which package does *she* come in???

      rpm -ivh hotbabe.rpm

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 3, Funny

      Package? Ha! No one pre-compiled her for any specific architecture. She was built purely from source and just for *my* architecture. ;)

    5. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, im sure all of these women use linux, or a computer...

    6. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 1

      If they do, then there's some potentially very happy men out there. If they don't, then they're missing out.
      When I met my wife, I had two loves: billiards and Linux. I met her in a poolhall. After the first conversation, I discovered she was a Comp-sci major and was using Linux for most of programming work cause she couldn't afford the MS dev tools. I fell in love when she told me she had successfully compiled LiVid for DVD playing functionality (this was a few years ago, mind you). We were married 3 months later and sleep under a Tux blanket each night (the fleece one you used to be able to get on ThinkGeek.com). So yes, some hot women *do* use computers and *do* run Linux on them.

    7. Re:Women love Linux too :) by AoT · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hate to say it but...

      In soviet russia, the package comes in her.

      ouch, I had to.

    8. Re:Women love Linux too :) by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Nice photosh^H^H^H^H^H^H^H GIMP job.

      lame lameness filter....

    9. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were right the first time. All these Linux fanboys wouldn't damage themselves attempting to use the GIMP. They all use pirated copies of photoshop to "stick it to The Man".

    10. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add:

      [Potentially] NSFW

    11. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Rumagent · · Score: 1

      Clearly you have no gf.

      It is obvious she is a package manager - and a damn good looking one too:)

    12. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Ernest+P+Worrell · · Score: 1

      ... I'm sold!

    13. Re:Women love Linux too :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not really a whole series... those are just random images.

    14. Re:Women love Linux too :) by benploni · · Score: 1

      I bet you thought you were kidding. But, as with most things related to Linux, reality is stranger than fiction:

      http://ftp.club-internet.fr/pub/linux/plf/mandra ke /src/hot-babe-0.1.2-2plf.src.rpm

      Yes, a real package of hot babe pics for desktop backgrounds.

    15. Re:Women love Linux too :) by onomatomania · · Score: 1

      Moderators, what exactly is "Interesting" about that link? That it proves that it's possible to use photoshop or the gimp to add linux logos to some model's undies? Wow, stop the presses, digital images can be manipulated! That's soooo interesting.

  17. Toys Don't Make Linux Work by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The toys made it fun, but the coders made it work. I think marketing droids are also to blame for overhyping linux to some extent during the dot com boom and causing a lot of companies who had good products to die young because they thought they were bigger than life.

    1. Re:Toys Don't Make Linux Work by cyberjoek · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they toys bring in the profit to pay the coders then the toys make it work :-). The "marketing droids" you refer to that caused the dot com boom/bust cycle weren't the only force. The notion that you could sell everything at a loss and make it up in volume was the other major problem. (also that losing money was some how profitable...) -Joe Kavanagh

    2. Re:Toys Don't Make Linux Work by flynt · · Score: 1

      Anyone care to comment on why there are several links to girls dressed up like the BSD devil in this thread, but only Photoshopped linix girls?

      Also, if anyone has a link to the NYlug picture of those 5 or 6 guys, please post the link. That picture never gets old! What is up with the wizard guy sitting crosslegged on the table, you know what I'm talking about!

  18. Teddy Penguins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So all we have to do is replace the teddybear with the teddy penguin and the world will be ours!

    1. Re:Teddy Penguins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So do we have to get "vermont teddy bears", target, mervyn, folies, kohl, etc. to start offering these?

  19. too easy now? by maliabu · · Score: 1

    would it create a side-effect where male with even higher ego thinks Linux is less challenging now that even booth girls can use it?

  20. They forgot to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that these penguins were stuffed with narcotics.

    1. Re:They forgot to mention... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 1

      Well stuffed penguins must be easier to use than Windows... I mean, have you ever tried to eat a window?!?!? that glass hurts your mouth!

    2. Re:They forgot to mention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, no. It is the flying windows that have narcotics. Linux is addidictive on its own.

  21. Old habits die hard... by lowe0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And people wonder where sexism in technology comes from.

    Using it to your advantage is not the same thing as working to eliminate it.

    1. Re:Old habits die hard... by Cthefuture · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is hardly a technology issue. Human beings are social in nature and therefore we all experience social pressures. It's a fact of being alive. To ignore the fact that women and men are different is assine.

      Using marketing is only natural. It works, and it works very well is all aspects of life, not just technology.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    2. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And people wonder where sexism in technology comes from.

      Different perception and perspective based on different evolutionary pressures combined with structural differences in the brain due to prenatal influence of sex hormones?

    3. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uber alles!

    4. Re:Old habits die hard... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      No, but the flipside of the "marketing" they are pushing is that women can't do things with computers that aren't "easy". So, when you staff an IT position, you would avoid hiring a woman based on this incorrect thinking.

      I am confident enough in my male identity to speak up when I don't understand something or when I think it is too hard to learn regardless of the gender of the person demonstrating it.

      For the record, I still think Linux is too hard to use on the desktop to be worthwhile rolling out in a big org (or for my personal use.) This despite the fact that my 8 year old daughter uses it.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:Old habits die hard... by pla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but the flipside of the "marketing" they are pushing is that women can't do things with computers that aren't "easy".

      I think a lot of Slashdotters have read more into this story than they should...

      They deliberately choose a spokeswoman based on pushing the "If she can do it, so can I" male ego button. The reverse of that, which you suggest they also pushed, does not hold true. If the implicit sexism didn't exist, their approach simply would not have worked.

      In no way would insulting a guy's ego by demonstrating that a woman can use Linux increase their sexist ideas. If anything, it demonstrates that yes, in fact, a woman can use Linux, when they cannot (yet).

    6. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, the typing in that one sucks... s/assine/asinine

    7. Re:Old habits die hard... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      it demonstrates that yes, in fact, a woman can use Linux, when they cannot (yet).

      You just proved my point.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:Old habits die hard... by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "For the record, I still think Linux is too hard to use on the desktop to be worthwhile rolling out in a big org (or for my personal use.) This despite the fact that my 8 year old daughter uses it."

      This is complete nonsense and artificially kept up Urban Myth.

      A Linux based enterprise systems with a huge number of desktops is the kind of deployment you want to have in a big org. The ease of a central administration with an incredible range of functional configuration tools makes it a breaze to have the kind of control of an enterprise desktopy system you need to prevent disasters like MyDoom or SOBIG or whatever other Windows quirks.

      With the latest KDE you can define the kind of usability and permissions for each desktop user you need to let him to his job without wreaking havoc over an enterprise They may not use the latest Windows gadget from obscure websites, but that should be fine by the management. Unless an enterprise is completely locked in with proprietary applications and data formats, Linux is the better work environment for 80 percent of regular office workers.

      Remember: Work desktops just need to provide the tools to get a job done. In Windows environments you either have dumb users with no rights whatsoever, or you have them as "administrator". That's different and a lot better implemented in today's state of the art Desktop environments for Unix/Linux.

      It's a smart move for any organisation that doesn't want to have their employers mess with their system, but just do their job.

    9. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it demonstrates that yes, in fact, a woman can use Linux, when they cannot (yet).

      You just proved my point.

      I think, by "they", he meant "the men". Otherwise, the entire post makes no sense. Ambiguous pronoun usage, but otherwise, I tend to agree with his point.
    10. Re:Old habits die hard... by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Oh, I totally read that as "they" meaning "women in general".

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    11. Re:Old habits die hard... by monique · · Score: 1

      Men and women may be different, but I can still out-code and out-sysadmin most men and women on the planet (Recognizing that the slashdot crowd is not "most men and women"). My friends come to me for linux advice more often than I come to them. So don't use some kind of "innate difference" line to claim that the attitudes being discussed here are justified.

      If anyone based their perception of ease of use on whether *I* can do it, well ... I pity the fool.

      --
      -monique
    12. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I very highly doubt you are typical.

      That's the whole problem. You're talking about average fools here, not the exceptions.

    13. Re:Old habits die hard... by monique · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that the OP was trying to say that "well, most women are technically incompetent compared to men, so it's okay to have the attitude that women are technically incompetent." Maybe I misread. As a female whose primary interests tend to be dominated by males, I see these sorts of attitudes enough that I may sometimes see them where they don't exist.

      It's frustrating when you realize that such a large number of people, both male and female, think that because you're female, you must be deficient in math, logic, and technical skills ... that you must lag behind the boys in sports ... etc. When I was in high school, my martial arts instructor proudly told my dad that I would be the third person in the history of the school to get a first degree black belt in such a short time. My dad's response? "The third female, right?" *sigh*

      There are days when I wish that I enjoyed cooking, knitting, kids, and chick flicks. It would make the navigation of so many aspects of society much easier. Fortunately, I've been able to find friends who are either like-minded or open-minded enough not to make stupid assumptions.

      --
      -monique
    14. Re:Old habits die hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, now you're treading into deep water.

      All sorts of people face these issues (racial minorities for one) and I agree that it's stupid. However, it's partly just because that's the way are brains work. We sort, we average, we guess, we assume. Otherwise we couldn't process the bombardment of information.

      I've worked with quite a few female programmers and mechanics over the years and I have to say I've never met one that was much above average (I would say this equally about most males as well). Not to say they don't exist but I've met some exceptional male programmers and no female counterparts.

      Show me just one even slightly successful large software project developed solely by a woman.

      I'm not really saying that to piss you off, but more as a male examining his own feelings. I would love to be proven wrong because it would forever change my attitude.

    15. Re:Old habits die hard... by monique · · Score: 1

      I would love to prove you wrong ... just lemme think of something big enough to impress you =)

      I have, by the way, met some exceptional female technical people. I work with a woman whose grasp of every level of the product we're developing, from the tiniest detail to the biggest picture, is astonishing. I ask her about the hardware, the software, the test cases ... she has it down. A coworker of mine at a previous company had a better grasp of the language we were using than any other programmer there -- and there were quite a few of us, some of whom I'd judge to be gurus.

      I would also like to see a successful large software project led by a woman. I think the "solely developed" bit part needs to be reevaluated, though. I can think of very few truly large efforts developed purely by one person, and in the cases I can think of, the "solely" part is more a matter of unwillingness to delegate and accept patches than it is a matter of great programming prowess. There's a lot of talent out there -- it would be stupid to reject it if it's offered.

      I agree, though. I'd love to see more visible projects led by women. (Led in the technical lead sense, not in the managerial sense.)

      --
      -monique
  22. I hate male ego by 31415926535897 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I should probably submit this anonymously*, but what the heck.

    I don't know if it is in our genes, or if it's a product of our environment, but male ego resulting from male dominance even affects me a ton.

    I was running on a treadmill earlier this week, and there was a girl who was running on one next to me at the same time, at roughly the same speed. There was _no_ way I was going to let myself stop before she did--because she was a girl. And I recognized this as I was running.

    Seems kind of silly, I know, but that's what was in my head.

    *I've heard that posting anonymously at slashdot isn't really, so what's the difference?

    1. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard that posting anonymously at slashdot isn't really, so what's the difference?

      With a 14 digit id, it doesn't.

    2. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, so? Don't leave us hanging.. did you out run her?

    3. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, some of us were capable of figuring out that he's really Pi.

    4. Re:I hate male ego by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gee, are you suggesting that certain human behavior is hardwired into our psyche? Just like every single other mammal on the planet? And you're just now realizing this??

      You can either accept that you're an animal with instincts, and learn how to control them/live with them, or you can deny your basic nature and keep banging your head against the wall. The choice is yours. The upshot on the former is, everyone else is governed by those same instincts, so you can use them to help get people to do what you want them to.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:I hate male ego by queen+of+everything · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I do too...

      I don't like that if a girl can do it, any man can...I can do a lot of things with a computer that many men can't do. I work hard to learn all that I can and I don't like that when I am up against a man, everyone automatically listens to what he says over me. I know what I'm talking about, I've been using computers longer than everyone that I know. When I go into a computer store all the clerks swarm to help the poor, defenseless, dumb girl buy expensive things for her computer. It really bugs me. Don't question my intelligence, I know what I'm doing.

      I think its an excellent way to market linux to a bunch of men, but it still bugs me that people think like that.

      --
      "Wisdom is not a product of schooling but of the life-long attempt to acquire it." -Albert Einstein
    6. Re:I hate male ego by pyros · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had a similar experience, only it was with two people: a tatooed woman and a midget. The midget didn't last too long, but he surprised me. I felt pretty relieved when the woman got off the treadmill. I quickly got off my cross-trainer and felt even more relieved when I saw that she had merely moved to a cycle after getting off the treadmill. Then I realised I was secretly competing with a tatooed lady and a midget. I promptly shrunk my hands, bathed in cabbage, and joined a carnival.

    7. Re:I hate male ego by monkeyfinger · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's not just me then.

      I went to the gym the other day to do some weight training and I wanted to get warmed up first. I decided that a gentle jog on the treadmill would get the blood moving. As soon as I started jogging a really pretty girl got on the treadmill next to me and started running and I ended running a lot faster and longer than I had originally intended to and my weight training suffered because of it.

      The worst part is that I knew exactly what I was doing, but I did it anyway.

    8. Re:I hate male ego by KjetilK · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hehe. Take it from me, unless you're a world class athlete, there is always a cute little 18 year-old girl who do it better than you. Get over it. :-)

      I learnt this fact of life allready when I was 16, and I think it probably helped me avoid a too-inflated ego...: It was at the end of one of my first mountain triathlon, and after three hours of running a was totally exhausted. Just before the final hard climb, there was this girl, one year younger than me, who just parked me completely.

      You bet, if you meet one of those one the threadmill next to you, and you awaken her competition instinct, you'll find yourself dying at the end of the threadmill at the end of the day... :-)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    9. Re:I hate male ego by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      I promptly shrunk my hands, bathed in cabbage, and joined a carnival.

      Austin Powers: There are only two things in this world that scare me and one is nuclear war.
      Basil Exposition: What's the other?
      Austin Powers: Huh?
      Basil Exposition: What's the other thing that scares you?
      Austin Powers: Carnies. Circus folk. Nomads, you know. Smell like cabbage. Small hands.

    10. Re:I hate male ego by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 1

      I was running on a treadmill earlier this week,

      A /.-er on a treadmill? No way! :)

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
    11. Re:I hate male ego by el-spectre · · Score: 2, Informative

      Until the last coupla millenia (centuries? decades?) , the primary social skill in our species has been dominance, usually physical. Most men are stronger than most women... we just carry these assumptions over into other fields. Old habits die hard.

      That said, if I have the choice, I prefer a female tech/mechanic/(fill in typically-male-job) because they tend to be the best, having had to overcome bias AND having had the guts to stick with it.

      Out of curiosity, are you the type of woman who is offended that they use pretty girls to seel beer, etc. ?

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    12. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saaaaaaay, what are you doing this evening?

      want some help "compiling" your kernel?

    13. Re:I hate male ego by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nothing brings this home to you more than getting your ass handed to you at a fighting game by some 12 year old asian kid after you spent a couple weeks memorizing all a character's moves.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:I hate male ego by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1
      I think its an excellent way to market linux to a bunch of men, but it still bugs me that people think like that.

      While I thinks it's a bad thing that people are judging you by your gender I hope you don't think that men are holding all the cards. There is one situation where men suffer horrific sexual inequality on a regular basis and this when it comes to child custody. Women almost always get custody. About the only time that a father gets custody is if the mother has a serious mental, drug or alcohol problem. There have been many cases where it has been the father who has stayed at home and brought up the children while the woman worked and the woman still gets custody. These miscarriages of justice happen all the time. I don't mean to belittle your suffering, but it isn't always easy being a man either.

      As an aside, congratulations on getting modded up to +5. I hope they people who gave you those points did so because they were moved by your plight and not because you are a woman. ;-)

    15. Re:I hate male ego by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      (Chuckles)

      I had a professor in graduate school, she said she still gets that treatment, especially since she's middle-aged. All these 20-something computer retailers treating a CS professor like she doesn't know a thing.

      Use it to your advantage. Surprise people. Never let them see you comin'.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    16. Re:I hate male ego by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Here's a secret: Just make excuses to yourself. For example, I smoke, so I can honestly say, there is no way in hell I'll beat a non-smoker on a treadmill irregardless of their gender..

      You can really make an excuse for anything if you try really...

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    17. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing a few CS profs that teach at the graduate level, I sure wouldn't expect them to know a thing about a modern consumer PC.

    18. Re:I hate male ego by renoX · · Score: 1

      >There was _no_ way I was going to let myself stop before she did

      No way? You're sure? You know some woman runs marathon! :-)

      I happened to run from time to time with my mom who used to run Marathon, what made me giggle some of the time is that passerbys could think something like this "oh, nice guy to run with his mother" while in reality it was the opposite: I had to stop before her!

    19. Re:I hate male ego by NegativeK · · Score: 1

      You know, when it comes to CS at the University level, I've found that the stereotype doesn't fit reality at all. In one of my university classes, there are four women out of thirty students. And from what I can tell, at _least_ two of them are working hard, and appear to be enjoying it, and I don't know anything about the other two.
      I wish the same ratio applied to the guys - I often hear them complain about how hard regular expressions are, and how such and such a class sucks.
      I guess that I'm trying to say that, due to the general stereotype that girls don't know anything about CS, you get more who actually enjoy it, are interested, and _want_ to be there, as opposed to the people who are in it for the "big bucks" (good luck on finding those.)

      --
      This statement is false.
    20. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to call your cards on this. Dominance has been the norm, yes, but hardly physical. You hardly expected the feudal lords to be stronger or faster than any of their peons (or whatever).

      That had completely different reasons.

    21. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bzzzt. Feudal Lords were historical. A mere split second compared to pre-historical. Think hunter-gatherer tribes, for 100's of thousands of years. Any example you give that spans less than 10 thousand years is utterly irrelevant.

    22. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked with several female programmers over the years. One with a Masters, one with a PHD, and some MCSD types. All were completely useless - it is upon this that I base my assumption that women are incapable of being good programmers. I'm yet to be proven wrong - though there are plenty who will rant that they are "just as good", "if not better"

    23. Re:I hate male ego by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      As a competitive runner/multisport athlete, I say bring it on. I love to see cute competitive 18 year old girls. Then if it turns out she can use linux, I'm really in love.

    24. Re:I hate male ego by darkmeridian · · Score: 0

      So you walk into a store and all the clerks swarm towards you. It may be discrimination. Or maybe you are really hot and they are interested in you. In this case, their behavior is just digusting instead of *disgusting*. So, what is it? Post a pic!

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    25. Re:I hate male ego by denks · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      When I go into a computer store all the clerks swarm to help the poor, defenseless, dumb girl buy expensive things for her computer

      When I walk into a store, Im surrounded by clerks who want to sell me the most expensive product too, and Im male. Believe it or not, thats what they do.
      On a bus do you get annoyed when people stand up for you because youre a female, but then get annoyed if they dont stand up because they should know that you may be in that time of the month and they should somehow know this?

      I hope that chip on your shoulder is salt and vinegar...those are yummy!

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
    26. Re:I hate male ego by TheLoneDanger · · Score: 1

      You think you've got it bad? When a guy goes up to the urinal next to me, I hope that I'm gonna be pissing longer than he is because my bladder is just that much bigger and I CAN TAKE IT...

      Yes, truly I am a sad, pathetic little man with incredible bladder control.

      --

      "But I trust in the people's capacity for reflection, rage and rebellion." -Oscar Olivera
    27. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you don't think "queen of everything" reflects any sex-related characteristics of yourself?

    28. Re:I hate male ego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to complain that this was unreasonable, but suddenly I found myself remembering how I once played ping-pong until 3 AM or something insane...

      Worse, she was still getting the hang of it, so I'd chase every last ball to keep it in play (translation: run around a hell of a lot, wearing myself out much faster than her).

      And yes, she was rather cute... ^_^

      Oh yeah; about anonymous posting: it'd take more time that it's worth to track anyone down, unless slashdot got a subpoena for some reason.

    29. Re:I hate male ego by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I don't like that when I am up against a man, everyone automatically listens to what he says over me [...] it still bugs me that people think like that.

      Well, the thing about prejudice is its often learned from experience.

      I do not doupt your knowledge or abilities, in fact you're likelly much l33ter than I am (I'm still strugling with recursive algorithms), but here's the thing: I'm much more learned in the computational arts than any of the women I know. I'm average compared to the guys I know though.

      Its not that women can't learn "manly" skills, its that they so rarely do that its only natural to assume that women you meet aren't the exception.

      Don't question my intelligence, I know what I'm doing.

      <sarcasm>Sure you do toots, sure you do</sarcasm> ;-)

      True story:
      I know women biker, grew up around bikers, I know some who can handle the biggest hogs like pros...well, I know pros actually : )
      I also used to rent motorcycles for driving exams. Took me less than one day to learn a lesson: Women who can handle a 450cc motorbike are the exception. Boy did I have to run onto the course a lot when I rented to women (they'd drop the bike because they couldn't handle it and I had to get it upright before the fuel would leak out of the carburator and slime up the course). Some women managed that bike well, I could usually tell from their body language before even letting them on the track, but most, and I mean most, couldn't. Hell, even had to bring one of them back in my arms, she sprained her ankle falling down (still picked the bike up first though, she wasn't leaking inflammable liquids).

      Point of the story:
      Do you have any idea how many clueless chicks wandered in those computers stores before you strolled in? Imagine those poor clerks having to deal with wave after wave of women asking if that computer came with the internet included...poor SOBs.

      Advice:
      Go to thinkgeek, get yourself a "there's no place like 127.0.0.1" or similar shirt and wear it proudly whenever you shop for gear. It'll get the message across.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    30. Re:I hate male ego by Poeir · · Score: 1

      Yes, with their gargantuan 200 MB hard drives and a whopping 32 MB of RAM.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    31. Re:I hate male ego by Ozan · · Score: 1

      I guess you'ld have had the same difficulties when you were running against a very old man.

      I think it's not male-ego-thing against females, but yourself not being able to admit to yourself you're not as good as you're supposed to be based on stereotypes. You're supposed to be better than a girl, better than old people, etc.

    32. Re:I hate male ego by Eivind · · Score: 1
      You are rigth. It's unfair. You *deserve* to be treated as equally knowledgeable as a average man (until you talk enough with the clerk that he/she understands that you're above-average).

      But it's not, in this case, male ego, but rather experience. The practical experience of those working in computer-shops (I know, I used to do it) is that the *average* knowledge of women who come in is, infact, like it or not, a LOT lower than the average knowledge of men.

      That ain't a good excuse to act as if you assume ALL women know nothing, there are plenty of exceptions in both directions (cluefull women, and clueless men), but the general trend is IMPOSSIBLE to not notice, even if you're trying.

      A clueful sales-person will however be very quick to take a hint. Both sorts of hints. The woman who comes in and says she needs a new CPU, yet obviously thinks the entire box is the CPU is probably average or below-average in knowledge. The one who comes in and wonders if the dual-screen output on the Matrox 550 will work with Linux is with certanity above-average.

      I don't know if it's much of a comfort to you, but we males experience such discrimination too, only in different areas of life. Who do you think is taken seriously when me and my fiancee is looking for clothing or equipment for our baby ? How often do you think I experience well-meaning women completely unmotivated coming over and giving me "helpful hints" about how to do perfectly basic things with the baby that I've known how to do for decades ? Somehow they all seem to assume that Silvia knows these things already...

      How many times have I heard some variation of; "Not bad at all, it's *soo* nice with a man who can cook", as if that was the exception and in general males suck at it.

      In general the biggest one is everything to do with kids. It's *common* to find that when malls or whatever have rooms for changing on a baby, that room is marked with Woman/baby-symbols. (in general there's three Woman, Man, and Woman/baby) I can tell you it's a lot of fun when some woman wants to chase you away with a "Can't you read?", and when I say; "Yeah, but this is the only changing room for babies here" I'm met with a "Can't the mother do it ?" and a look of total disbelief and strong suspicion when I say that, as a matter of fact, the mother is working, and I'm taking care of MY kid by myself.

    33. Re:I hate male ego by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 1

      Um, actually, that was their purpose in life.

      Feudal lords were the warrior class of the middle ages. Essentially, the social contract worked out such that a select group of people (the lords) spent the vast majority of their time training in greco-roman wrestling, riding, and of course, their weapons training. Even up through the 1300s, it was still very common for Kings to ride onto the battlefield and actually do battle. The concept of "divine right of kings" didn't really arise until the 1500s at the earliest (at least that I'm aware of). Prior to that, Kings were the best warriors: the guys who could fight well and lead well enough to earn the respect of a group of people. Of course, the mantel then passed to their offspring, but in the years before actual nation-states, it didn't take a huge amount of change for another guy to come in and be King.

      Now, up into the Renaissance era, things started change, and that was when the lords started to become the more decadent, "boss-men" figures that a lot of medieval movies tend to depict.

      One more random fact: The avergae person living in the dark ages or midieval times was about 5'5" (for a man), and at about 5' for a woman. Of course, that's a mode, and it's thrown off by the huge numbers of peasants. The feudal lords, by virtue of the fact that they could eat meat (nowhere near common in a peasant diet) and basically spent their days working out, wouldn't be at all distinguishable from a modern man, height or strength-wise.

    34. Re:I hate male ego by cryms0n · · Score: 0

      Interesting ...

  23. If marketing fails... by darth_silliarse · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...the German authorities could always do what the Americans do best - the "USA vs Everyone" stance. A "SuSE vs Microsoft" stance would help seeing as SuSE is a Germany based distro

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:If marketing fails... by Wudbaer · · Score: 1

      A "SuSE vs Microsoft" stance would help seeing as SuSE is a Germany based distro

      ... now swallowed up by a big bad American company. That argument used to work, but now is more or less dead.

    2. Re:If marketing fails... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Was a". Not "is a". Owned by a nice little company from Utah, that seem to be fond of the color red and really big "N"s in everything.

  24. Hmm.... by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Funny

    These booth girls... if i'm new to Linux, will they 'mount' my 'hard drive'?
    I'd be sure to try switching to Linux then! ;)

    1. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, but you may wind up supporting 'Fire Wire' unwittingly.

    2. Re:Hmm.... by TheWickedKingJeremy · · Score: 1

      These booth girls... if i'm new to Linux, will they 'mount' my 'hard drive'?

      Oh come on - you weren't even trying with that one. ;)

      --

      my religion lies somewhere between buddhism and super monkey ball - pamphlet?
    3. Re:Hmm.... by Bostik · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just out of curiosity, what would be the mount options?

      -oremount,rw,async,nodev,nosuid,noauto ?
      --
      There is no such thing as good luck. There is only misfortune and its occasional absence.
    4. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably also -o ignoreerrors

    5. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been looking for an excuse to post cute obscene lyrics

      You was playing with my floppy
      then my harddisk dowloaded
      down your throat, f* exploded.
      --afroman

    6. Re:Hmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you're using a 3 1/2 inch Floppy. ;-P

    7. Re:Hmm.... by Life2Short · · Score: 2, Funny

      MMmmmmm Senior German Chairwoman..... Mmmmmm.

    8. Re:Hmm.... by stor · · Score: 1

      These booth girls... if i'm new to Linux, will they 'mount' my 'hard drive'?

      Well if you keep up that sweet talk, I believe you'll be beating them off with a stick!

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
    9. Re:Hmm.... by shplorb · · Score: 2, Funny

      read-only, don't want to be writing anything to that drive, unless you can handle the increased load on your wallet in 9 months.

    10. Re:Hmm.... by acceptera · · Score: 1

      Only if you learn to 'unzip', 'strip', 'finger' and 'touch' first.

  25. So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I cant imagine this being a very successful company, when they have to use bribes and sex to encourage the employees to use a tool you've mandated.

    Hell, this is kinda like McDonalds deciding to use a different type of cash register, then having someone attractive go by and give each McWage Slave a free friggin teddy bear, in order to get them to use the new machine.

    How about this approach... "Use the damned software!". Really, I dont know why people seem to think they should have complete freedom on a computer at work. The company owns the machine, and the company chooses the software... so long as the company involved the proper employees in evaluating which is the best software(s) to use... thats it, end of story. Employees really shouldnt have a choice one way or another.

    So instead, you get this boneheaded company in germany, that is now going to have a number of mail employee's that have no clue how to use the software, and thus loose productivity, because there ego refuses to let them be beat by a girl?!?!

    Besides that point... does male ego really apply that much to intellectual persuits? I mean, do most people think men are better then women at using a computer because of genetics? I doubt the number is high. Now, those hard to open jar lids... yeah, ego still applies there.

    1. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      LOL, I love how disagreeing == flame baiting on slashdot... ;)

    2. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about this approach... "Use the damned software!". Really, I dont know why people seem to think they should have complete freedom on a computer at work. The company owns the machine, and the company chooses the software... so long as the company involved the proper employees in evaluating which is the best software(s) to use... thats it, end of story. Employees really shouldnt have a choice one way or another.

      Ever heard the phrase "you attract more flies with honey than vinegar?" Honestly, I'd rather work for someone who is respectful of my concerns and seeks to answer them (even in a devious way), than someone who just scoffs at them and says "Shut up and get back to work." Even the military, the only employer who can throw you in jail or have you shot for not doing what you're told, tends to be relatively light handed in how it encourages its members to use new systems.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by TrevizeNet · · Score: 2, Informative
      "Use the damned software!". Really, I dont know why people seem to think they should have complete freedom on a computer at work. The company owns the machine, and the company chooses the software... so long as the company involved the proper employees in evaluating which is the best software(s) to use... thats it, end of story. Employees really shouldnt have a choice one way or another.

      To quote Mary Poppins "A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down". People don't like change, if my boss told me that tomorrow we're going to start using black swingline staplers instead of the red one that I love then I would probably complain. I would complain less if the stapler replacement was given to me by an attractive brunette who bats her eyes. This company found a way to make a change without destroying overall morale, what's wrong with that?
    4. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How about this approach... "Use the damned software!".
      You're missing the point. That approach doesn't provide the free publicity.
      does male ego really apply that much to intellectual persuits?
      Is there any subject in existance where the Male Ego doesn't apply?
      Most people are sheep. They follow the rules of society without thought and most of them wouldn't even realise they are following set rules.
      Men and women have their roles to play, and any deviation is seen as weird and undesirable.
      Wear a pink shirt and tell other males you don't like beer and football if want to see this in action.
    5. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Snad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Deciphering all the typos in that post was an interesting experience...

      Regardless, the main point - that a corporation is a dictatorship - is factually correct. However, if you treat your employees as if they have no valuable opinions on the tools they will be using to do their jobs, then you will lose buy in, and have a revolt.

      The employees aren't exactly going to be turning up at their manager's door with pitch-forks and flaming torches, but they are going to be grumbling, moaning, bitching, whining, and likely looking for another job. Successful companies retain staff by ensuring they feel valued.

      Basically, treating your employees like shit gets you nothing but shit employees. Acting in a dictatorial manner simply because you can simply creates more problems than it solves. It is vital in large scale change projects to ensure that people at least feel like they've been consulted, even if you end up ignoring everything they've said.

      The productivity lost in replacing numbers of employees would be far more costly than simply throwing some toy penguins and a blonde bimbo into the equation.

      I am, of course, assuming that once the buy in was created by the "weaker sex" and toy penguin strategy there is sufficient training and backup in place - without which the entire project is doomed to failure anyway.

    6. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 1

      No, I over exagerated in my origonal post... "Use the damned software!" im not meaning as a direct quote. However, basically when it boils down to it, if the company makes a decision to use a piece of software... why should they have to coerce people into using it?!?! The end user has no choice in the matter... now they can be nice about rolling it out, offer training and support etc... But bribing employees? Coercion... yeah, thats a good way to get people to buy in .

      Ive worked in companies on a number of occasions, where the end users seemed to think they had control over the software they use, and the computer in general. Taking an approach like that mentioned in this article just re-inforces that mindset, which is a bad thing.

      As a direct example... at a company I worked with in the past, they switched to Maximo, from an older (unsupported) piece of software. However, the mindset was so entrenched that users controlled there machines and work process, that a few people refused to use the new program. Due to bad management, duplicate entries had to be done to accomidate these people... Another example was when one of the server drives got full and wash basically crashing everything ( the joys of novell... ) and IT did a network wide delete on all .mp3 files in personal folders on the network drive. This created a shitstorm, because "there" space was violated...

      These are just two examples of why this type of mindset is bad for a corporate environment. Dont get me wrong, ive worked at a bank which locked EVERYBODY down to basically nothing. This isnt fun either... Everything had a procedure, and if you didnt like something, or wanted something changed, tough shit. I can understand the argument from both sides of the fence, and you have to walk a thin line between allow people enough access/ownership of their desktops that they are productive. However, you can never let their feeling of ownership disrupt the success of the business or the viabilty of the network, pure and simple.

    7. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between professionals and McSlaves. For example, most university professors get a certain amount of money for computers and software and can buy whatever they want. If all your company is doing is running Office, then giving your people the choice of what system to use is probably a good way to make them happy. I'm kind of far out on this curve, but I wouldn't work at a company that would not allow me to use a Mac.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    8. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Regardless, the main point - that a corporation is a dictatorship - is factually correct. However, if you treat your employees as if they have no valuable opinions on the tools they will be using to do their jobs, then you will lose buy in, and have a revolt.

      And, I agreed with you 100% in my post. During the evaluation phase, the employees that are going to be effected should be consulted. You shouldnt just force software down your employees throats just because some suit liked it, or got some sweet kickback for buying it, and sadly this happens far to often. However, this isnt what I said at all.

      This isnt the evaluation phase they are talking about... The software was already decided on. To quote "how they persuaded workers to accept the changes." So, instead of consulting employees, and getting something that worked best for the group... they just went ahead and bought something, and then tried to sell it by giving away stuffed toys and using sex appeal. So... I think this is a badly run companies decision for two reasons... 1) they didnt involve the people whose jobs are being impacted in the decision phase and 2) they drive apdotion through bribery and coercion.

      Yep, sounds like a solid business plan to me... um huh!

    9. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Depending on your occupation, I think you would be slamming ALOT of doors in your face having that mindset. Purely on the administration side of thinks, if you are at a company that uses 1000 windows PC's and you are the sole mac guy, I would highly doubt you would get IT's buyin to support this one oddball machine. Not to even mention justifying to the company to spend twice as much for a machine, which to them is less useful then the company standard, just because you like it better.

      That said, if you are in IT, or say graphic arts. Or perhaps are a sales rep that spends most of your time away from the office, that is different. Namingly, if you support your own machine and are in a job that will allow that ( which many wouldnt for a variety of perfectly valid reasons ), than it is somewhat understandable to be able to pick your own machine. I am in such a position to some degree as I make purchasing decisions... thats said, being in IT is the exception, not the rule. The rules governing computing in regards to IT staff by its very nature, have to be different to some degree, then those that apply to average workers.

    10. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by corbettw · · Score: 1

      No, I over exagerated in my origonal post... "Use the damned software!" im not meaning as a direct quote.

      Well, in that case, you're mostly right. And I think that's what these firms are doing. They're just making the switch more comfortable for employees, to help avoid the problems you experienced with the switch to Maximo, for example.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    11. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      First, Macs aren't twice as expensive as PCs by a long shot. A Mac is about the same price as a name brand PC.

      And as for my job, I'm a Macintosh programmer :-)

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    12. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by Serapth · · Score: 1

      LOL... well you definatly qualify in the "needs a mac to do his job" category then. :)

    13. Re:So Just how screwed up are these companies?!?! by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Man, you went straight for the contradiction, with no intervening filler!

      Is there any subject in existance where the Male Ego doesn't apply?

      ...

      Most people are sheep.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  26. If BSD weren't dying... by gUmbi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If BSD weren't dying it'd be presented by this chick

    1. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Dude.... she so seriouly needs to eat something.

    2. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, if she doesn't look like a 12 year old boy, she's too much woman for a BSDer.

    3. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by flynt · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but that *CAN'T* be legal!

    4. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm dealing with a pretty goddamn small sample size here, but every guy I know who is passionate about FreeBSD who has a girlfriend or a wife has a fat girlfriend or wife. This is purely anecdotal so I'm not trying to imply causation, or even correlation, except to deny that they need waifs. Mostly, they can't even get a waif, and if they did, they'd slip through their fat fingers.

    5. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Shinobi · · Score: 1

      Why not? Age of consent is 15 in Sweden

    6. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm sorry, i'd have to card that girl to even ascertain that she was 15!

    7. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 14 in Canada.

    8. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, like my cock!

    9. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I'd take the Linux girl over her any day.

    10. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Y'know whats Really Ironic about that?

      Visit the page the pic's have in their top/bottem corners, (peachez16.com), and it's a redhat enterprize page :D

    11. Re:If BSD weren't dying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to what set of laws? Oh. Of cause. The ones from USA. They hold worldwide - well. At least in USA, but everybody knows that USA IS the world.

  27. The Perception is the Reality by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oddly enough, I recently saw this in Doctorow's "East Coast Tribe", but this was something I learned when I first worked in an IT department.

    It doesn't matter if your systems are uber-fast. It doesn't matter if they have a low error rate. It doesn't matter if they are made to be user friendly.

    If the users of those systems perceive they are slow, inefficient, hard to use, great, best machines ever - whatever they percieve, that is the reality.

    So a good IT staff does two things:

    1. Work on their C. I. A. pieces.
    2. Work to help the users percieve their systems as being C. I. A. good.

    Let's face it - this is why Microsoft is on 90-odd% of all desktop systems out there: people percieve their systems as working, as easy to use, and that everything else is inferior whether that is true or not.

    Once you convince them that a Linux or Mac desktop works just as well - if not faster and more securely - on their desk as a Windows box, and that they can use the same kinds of applications, you're set.

    I've had IT guys whom I respect greatly tell me they'd love to switch to "OS X", but don't want to because they fear the "learning curve". It's not a "noobie" issue at all - perception clouds everything.

    And Brauner made the right calls. To those who had problems, he showed them how it was easy. To those who thought he was being mean, he displayed himself as a "fun guy" with shirts and toys. To those who thought the system was "hard" he showed a secretary doing her job with ease - the person that all my programming teachers taught me to program interface for, since "if a secretary can run it, anybody can".

    Excellent work on his part for recognizing that the human element is as important as the technical one at times.

    1. Re:The Perception is the Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, you write your interface for the secretary because if the secretary can't do it, it won't get done.

    2. Re:The Perception is the Reality by bobdinkel · · Score: 1
      You made excellent comments which I agree with for the most part. However, I have a bit of nitpicking to do:
      • I don't believe that this is the only reason Microsoft controls the vast majority of desktops in the world. I don't even think it's the main reason. I imagine it has more to do with it's prevalence. Most people don't choose an OS. They choose a computer. The OS is just there. If you asked the average person to name as many operating systems as they could, assuming they knew what the hell that was, you'd hear Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows XP, etc. They aren't aware of a choice.
      • he showed a secretary doing her job with ease
        Actually, she was a senior chairwoman. You didn't even have to RTFA to get that one. It's scarey how deeply ingrained some stereotypes are.
      --
      A publicly traded company exists solely to make profits for shareholders.
    3. Re:The Perception is the Reality by laughing+canard · · Score: 1

      IT people fear the learning curve on a MAC? You have got to be kidding! You're certainly right about perception clouding everything.

    4. Re:The Perception is the Reality by Myopic · · Score: 1

      yo, two days ago i might have thought you were kidding. but last nite i was talking with my girlfriend and i was saying how i'm baffled about the choices people make about computers and software: if people hate popups, why the hell do they use the *only* browser which supports them? if people hate Word, why the hell don't they use one of the many full-features alternatives? she responded by saying well maybe people just don't know there are superior products out there, and gave Macintosh as her example: she said that before she started dating me, she had no idea that Macs were "supposed to be easier to use than PCs". i was shocked. i seriously thought that everyone knew that, but chose to buy PCs anyway.

      it makes me think i could earn a million dollars with a simple ad in the paper: "Hey. Do popups annoy you when you surf the web? Well they don't annoy me because I never ever see them. For $250 I will come to your house and set up your computer so that you never see another popup in your life!"

      step two: profit!

    5. Re:The Perception is the Reality by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      I get many pop-ups on my Windows PC offerering this service, or a peice of software that will stop pop-up s for me. Did you send them?

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
  28. Yeah! by pookguy · · Score: 1

    Nice story and a big win for Linux.

  29. golden by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

    i have either purchased or picked up lots of stuffed penguins large and small, but my favorite one of all is this one.

    sorry Joe Barr and Mike Tiemann, maybe next time :)

  30. Women can use Linux now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's it, I'll switch to hurd.

    1. Re:Women can use Linux now? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      I'm sure that (if and) when my missus starts using Linux, it'll still be my fault when her PC falls over...

      "You didn't compile my kernel properly and now my kernel has panicked and I can't boot my PC and my mother said I should never have got together with a geek like you and you never buy me any nice presents and..."

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  31. A push in the right direction? by Cel+Shady · · Score: 1

    It'll be interesting to see how this migration affects the Linux world. In theory, this should help speed up fixing certain usability issues, and it will certainly help push compatibility between MS Office and open source office applications.

  32. New marketing tagline by denofslack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously a joke, but is the new line for marketing Linux in the mainstream going to be: Linux -- so easy to use, even a woman can do it! Or better yet: If it's your hardware, ask your teenager for support. If it's your OS, as your wife.

    1. Re:New marketing tagline by Tonik,+the · · Score: 1

      So, if nowadays we believe an ideal wife is one who is pretty, intelligent, and good at cooking*, are our children going to deprecate one of these virtues in favor of "good at Linux"? :)

      * I'm not sure if that's a Russians' perception only or worldwide standard

  33. But consider this ... by psycho_tinman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can just see the marketing people on the other side *cough* those convicted monopolists, remember them ? the guys who claim the GPL should be stamped out ? *cough* making hay with this.. ?

    "Ooh, we don't manipulate you", they'll coo. "We just give you a product that you know and is easy to use". And heck, if that doesn't work, they'll just add a whopping discount on top of it to seal the bargain.

    Maybe I'm just egotistic myself, but if I heard that I had been manipulated into something I wasn't sure about, and if I heard about it later on (with a "ha ha ha. owned!" comment, to boot), I'd be quite wary of the next thing that particular guy tried to foist on me.

    Which brings me to the question.. does OSS really need marketshare like this ? It's just me, probably, but I'd prefer people make an informed choice rather than go "hey, why don't we use this because we don't want to be outdone/look foolish". If you can convince people to install it that easily, they'll just as easily be swayed by the next marketing gimmick, and which side (OSS or the other guys) have more marketing muscle ?

    1. Re:But consider this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that the company decided on Linux for what we assume are 'all the right reasons' before introducing it to their staff with this marketing spin.

  34. Deodorant joke, anyone? by Shazow · · Score: 4, Funny

    New linux slogan!

    "Easy enough for a woman, made for a man."

    =8-]

    - shazow

    1. Re:Deodorant joke, anyone? by smack_attack · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Easy enough for a woman, made by boys in their mom's basements." /cliche

    2. Re:Deodorant joke, anyone? by akgoddess · · Score: 1

      Now if only you can find a voluptous, buxom female... willing to pose in the ad... leaning ON the computer, not USING it of course!

      Angelina Jolie maybe?

    3. Re:Deodorant joke, anyone? by arkanes · · Score: 1
      Back when stileproject.com was amusing and sometimes interesting, before the porn sellout, it had a gallery called "linux loving sluts". It's probably still there if you google for it, although I'm at work and can't provide you with a link.

      If underwear models with Tux on thier briefs isn't enough for you, I don't know what will be.

  35. have some fun! by 23 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    so what's the problem? Dude, don't take yourself so seriously! :-)

    when I'm out running along a well used path in my town, there is no fucking way I can live with a woman running infront of me. At times this put me close to a heart-attack. But I have all the more fun because this kind of stuff. Same thing, when I try to overtake someone who is barely slower than me. heh.

    Man, this is oart of the fun of life! As long as you realize, that your life does not depend on being cooler/stronger/faster/whatever I consider it good-natured fun. After all, where would be in technology without some good ol' testosterone-driven competition?

    plus, women have some fun --uhm, let's call them characteristics to laugh about

    1. Re:have some fun! by uradu · · Score: 1

      > there is no fucking way I can live with a woman running infront of me.

      And I thought that was the ONLY way to run...

    2. Re:have some fun! by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      You guys have it all wrong. You should let them get in front or stop running first or whatever... how else are you going to get a good look at them while they are occupied?

  36. ID should be 31415926535898 by hcg50a · · Score: 1

    Hey, I like your user id!

    But you rounded the last digit wrong.

    The value is

    3.14159265358979...

    so, rounding to 13 decimal digits (after the decimal point) and removing the decimal would yield 31415926535898

    --
    HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
    11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
    1. Re:ID should be 31415926535898 by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      I like pie, too!

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:ID should be 31415926535898 by Sneftel · · Score: 1

      Ya know, next time I make a username, it'll be 3.14158.... just to give guys like you coronaries.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
  37. So, what are geeks supposed to run now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Now, that even "chick's" can run it,... wbahhh, just joking, of course,..)

    Ok, this is what we all (ok, a lot of us,... ok, me,...) have been waiting for,... and it's great! but now that it's happening, (Linux domination) what OS are geeks supposed to use now?
    Now that everyone is using it linux will be 'uncool' and 'ungeeky', does that mean that geeks will all the sudden be embraced as cool and poineering,.... yeah i doubt it too, so what OS are we supposed to use now?

    It's like U2 was great up to WAR (2nd album) then everybody started liking them and made them 'uncool',... so i had to find a new band,...

    1. Re:So, what are geeks supposed to run now? by Darth+RadaR · · Score: 1

      There's always Plan 9 if you'd like to continue an under the radar subculture. It's so exclusive and cool that slashdot doesn't even have an icon of
      Glenda for it yet. ;)

      --
      /*drunk.. fix later*/
    2. Re:So, what are geeks supposed to run now? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      It's like U2 was great up to WAR (2nd album) then everybody started liking them and made them 'uncool'

      ...except those of us who always thought Bono had his head up his own rectum and never stopped playing their Led Zeppelin albums.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  38. Sex Sells by Slowtreme · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone watch that "The Apprentice" show. Two groups of 8 people, men on one side, women on the other. The first four tasks, the women stumbled around like lost puppies for 3 of them and yet won every time. The catch, they gave out thier phone number, while selling Lemonade for 10 bucks a cup. The guys couldn't sell jack.

    It's not surprizing that having a woman demo Linux, people are interested in learning.

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
    1. Re:Sex Sells by cubicledrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyone watch that "The Apprentice" show.

      Yeah. I've never seen anything more tragic and discouraging on television. The most amazing thing about that show is that it almost perfectly mirrors the modern workplace.

      For that matter, so does Survivor: a group of people get together and decide who to ostracize. A fine example for society.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    2. Re:Sex Sells by nolife · · Score: 1, Funny

      Imagine Carly in a bathing suit on the side of every HP/Compaq shipping box.. I don't think that would help sales much.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    3. Re:Sex Sells by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      >The most amazing thing about that show is that it almost perfectly mirrors the modern workplace.

      The ratio to good-looking women to men was 2 to 1.

      I, for one, welcome our new modern workplace....

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    4. Re:Sex Sells by cfuse · · Score: 1
      The ratio to good-looking women to men was 2 to 1

      I'd rather work with homely people who are human than that bunch of fucking vipers.

    5. Re:Sex Sells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh? The minute we have a naked, gay guy parading about the workplace.... *shudder*

  39. MOD PARENT UP!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parent post is a truly valid argument, corporations are not democracies and they are perfectly within their rights to make these choices without the consent of the users.

    I'm not saying that it's not good policy to enlist the users to add real commentary on whether or not the proposed software will do the job it is supposed to do, in fact I would say that a company that didn't was destined for oblivion, but nevertheless, the users will use the software that the company dictates - and that is that.

    Don't mod this guys comment as flamebait just because you don't agree with his standpoint.

  40. Amusing by sir_cello · · Score: 4, Funny


    Good to know that Linux wins on technical merit and avoids the kind of gimmicks used by other big name software vendors ...

    1. Re:Amusing by globalar · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, don't you think the reason Linux isn't as big as we all think it should be is because we have all been stressing reality and the points of fact where Linux is a great OS?

      We have the great OS, but is that really what people want - is that even enough to promote adoption? I think we need to become disillusioned with the masses and realize they don't care about all the things /.-types care about. Sex excluding, of course ;)

  41. Macho macho Nerd... by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    I want to be an Macho Nerd!

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  42. See by Gr8Apes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Linux isn't hard.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  43. Same in US, but unspoken by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Not that it's a great sales tactic: "You don't need that wimpy ease-of-use"

    Gotta keep the spin "Easy enough for *her*, so you can certainly handle it."

    Yeah, well despite all the lipservice for equality, there's still plenty of cavemen who think only a man can do such-and-such. A remarkable comment on futuristic magazine ads, back in the 50's, projected the lady of the house still doing all the work, just with more high-tech, work-saving tools. Watch day-time TV and the message that men and women have the same roles from back then is still there.

    Good leverage. Works with racism as a motivator, too. "Hey, that (insert ethnicity here) can do pretty good with a (insert tool here), guess I better be able to do as well or my arguments of everyone being inferior to (insert own ethnic group here) falls flat."

    Americans tend to have a lot of levers, thanks to lingering puritanical attitudes (watch the super bowl half time show? ;-) Careful how you try to apply them at work, though. The spin that "she can do it, so anyone should be" could land your butt on the sidewalk.

    PHB's OTOH could probably care less. Hit them with the true TCO and they're half in the pocket. Problem I've run into is most have this dinosaur attitude that Microsoft makes everything easier. If only...

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      there's still plenty of cavemen who think only a man can do such-and-such.

      "Dearest? Would you please go out and load those 27 bags of concrete into the truck please?"

      Oops, guess not.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    2. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by AoT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems that having a strong woman be an example is a good balance; the sexism is only implicit for those who are more conservative and therefore less likely to want to switch in the first place. As long as you don't run around the office shouting about how linux is so easy even a woman can use it.

    3. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by katarac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It seems that most commercials and tv shows over-compensate for female equality. On the rare occasion that I catch a new prime-time "family" sitcom, the dad is usually a big idiot and the mom is the one who holds the home together. Especially in commercials when the wife will leave the man of the house in charge of dinner, and he doesn't know how to boil water or something. It's pretty lame. Personaly, I've found that this formula only works on The Simpsons, Family Guy, and maybe a couple of other, genuinly funny, shows.

      That's right, The Simpsons can do no wrong.

    4. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      "Dearest? Would you please go out and load those 27 bags of concrete into the truck please?"

      No problem for my mom in her prime. She raised 8 kids and as a teen I found out how strong she was when I mouthed off once.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yeah, well despite all the lipservice for equality, there's still plenty of cavemen who think only a man can do such-and-such.

      The American record for the mile is 3:47.69; the women's record is 4:16.71. That is worse then the men's worldwide record of 1895.

      There's plenty of thing men can do that women do more poorly, and plenty of things that women can do that men do more poorly.

    6. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diana Nyad.

      Are there are a few who are in a class all by themselves.

    7. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Shit, I bet my wife could easily kick the average male geek's ass in a contest like that. She works for an ambulance company, with a female partner, lifting stretchers all day with patients weighing up to 800 pounds (no shit). Though I will admit that when the patient exceeds 350 pounds, they get another crew (2 EMTs) to help lift, though this is the same limit that the *guys* use to request additional assistance.

      While the extreme limits of strength are influenced by male/female, the "normal" range is determined far more by excercise.

    8. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She works for an ambulance company, with a female partner, lifting stretchers all day with patients weighing up to 800 pounds

      Wow, does the ambulance company employ other World Champion powerlifters, Olympic weightlifting Gold Medalists and world record holders?

    9. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      When my sister was applying to various ambulance companies a few years back she showed me a copy of one of the physical aptitude tests. It was almost exactly my workout! Mind you, at that time I was 6', 200lbs, and my sister was 5'1", 105lbs (I'm quite a bit larger now, she's stayed about the same).

      I don't know if she passed the test or not, as she didn't end up working for that company. It wouldn't suprise me if she did. Of course, when she was actually doing the job it turned out that her real strength was getting big strong firemen to do the lifting for her ;-)

      I guess the lesson here is: sexism can be a tool in the right hands.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    10. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people seem to confuse equality of rights with equality of ability, education, etc.

    11. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's plenty of thing men can do that women do more poorly, and plenty of things that women can do that men do more poorly.

      Ladies and gentlemen, the voice of reason.

      Thanks.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    12. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you insinuating that no woman should ever get a job as "running a mile" in your company?

      Just because the best of men happen to be better in this respect?

      Or on the average, as you imply in your last sentence.

      Those both are chauvinistic bull.

    13. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      No, but they recently purchased a special ambulance just for those big patients. Extra-wide heavy-duty stretcher, hydraulic lifts, and extra-heavy-duty suspension.

      They won't even dispatch that vehicle unless the patient weighs at least 600 pounds. As it is, it's one of the busiest vehicles in the fleet.

      Before they got that vehicle, they would put the patient on a heavy canvas tarp, and put them on the floor of the ambulance after removing the stretcher and it's mounting hardware. Regular stretchers would just collapse under the weight, even if you could fit the patient on it.

    14. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Malcontent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is your record for the mile?

      You are talking about the extremes there. How many women at your workplace can outrun you in the mile?

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    15. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by rynthetyn · · Score: 1

      While the extreme limits of strength are influenced by male/female, the "normal" range is determined far more by excercise.

      This is why my sister could be the only girl in her highschool hockey league and still be able to dish it out as much as anybody (despite having to deal with guy's playing "check the girl"--when she dished it back at 'em, they stopped pretty quick).

      I, on the other hand, prefer intellectual pursuits, and just because I can use Linux proves nothing about it's ease of use.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines...
    16. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Yes, but thinking is not one of the things that women do more poorly. That's the argument.

    17. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Of all the possible examples you could have used, that's about the worst one.

      The thing that annoys me the most about the sexism in the computer geek cultre is that too many guys seem to feel that coding or sysadmining is a manly-man's job that's on par with athletics or physical labor. Hell, they seem to think that being able to write good code 'proves' their manlyness the same way that lifting heavy objects or beating someone else in combat does - notice the 'my kung fu is better' comments and 'real men code ' quotes. Of course lumberjacks, miners, soldiers, etc. would laugh at the very thought of fat geeks acting macho while they code in assembler.

      While the computer geeks I've known in real life are cool, the loudest ones online remind me more of the attitudes of the high school football team than the science club. Perhaps geeks who are denied an oppurtunity to be macho and tough through sports are taking that attitude to their hobby and work?

    18. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Hehe, my wife's nose is just slightly off-line. She got it broken, twice, with a hockey stick, while playing pond hockey as a kid.

      Though I suspect that a few falls related to training horses in hunter-jumper competition didn't help things.

    19. Re:Same in US, but unspoken by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Muscle-labour is one area in which men tend to be better on average than women. Another is mathematics (have there been any great female mathematicians?); given that computer science is mathematics, it's not surprising and is in fact quite reasonable to consider excellence therein to be a masculine activity.

      Not, I should note, that a lower average ability in mathematics means that one is instrinsically worth even a little bit.

      And as for some geeks being rude & crude, it doesn't seem all that illogical to me. If those are masculine traits (learned or genetic doesn't matter, in this case), one would expect them to be. A cripple may be macho about chess-playing, even though he cannot move his legs; why would a coder not be macho about coding?

      That said, I tend to think that machismo, trash-talking and the like are pretty silly.

  44. In a reversal: Linux made me eat at Macdonalds by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Funny

    A few years ago they gave away beanie babies with Happy Meals: I just had to get the penguin one :-) (Actually, I got two as I had a SMP box at the time!)

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:In a reversal: Linux made me eat at Macdonalds by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      (Actually, I got two as I had a SMP box at the time!)

      I didn't realize Happy Meal's came in multi-proc. Hm. Learn something new every day.

  45. or.. by Hagakure · · Score: 1

    you know.. maybe it is just a good operating system?!

    --


    If this is Heaven I'm bailin out! I cant tolerate this ol tin-tub, so fulla trash and rats...
  46. The only thing stopping Linux... by Teckla · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For a long time, I've been a huge proponent of ease-of-use. While I respected Linux from a technical perspective, I've long been dissapointed in it from an ease-of-use perspective.

    That all changed the last time I tried Linux. Knoppix, to be exact. It was jaw-droppingly impressive to me: the hardware recognition; the ease-of-use; the clean interface (KDE, in this case, though I suspect GNOME is just as nice); everything was polished and smooth.

    And then it hit me, there are only two things stopping Linux from making deep inroads into the desktop market these days:

    1. Drivers, drivers, drivers. Not enough hardware makers are bothering with drivers for Linux. Kudos to all the Linux folks writing drivers, but Linux is always at least a step or two behind. However, this problem may be solved if the project that allows Windows drivers to work under Linux is successful.

    2. Inertia. Everyone uses Windows, therefore...everyone keeps using Windows.

    My hope is that the low cost of Linux will keep driving people into its loving arms.

    So...how does this post apply to the topic at hand? Simple: anyone who has given modern distributions of Linux a chance already knows what I know: Linux is just as easy to use as Windows these days (or close enough that it doesn't matter), and the only thing holding Linux back now are the two items I listed above. Anyone who claims modern distributions of Linux are too hard to use probably shouldn't be using computers at all.

    -Teckla

    1. Re:The only thing stopping Linux... by tuffy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1. Drivers, drivers, drivers. Not enough hardware makers are bothering with drivers for Linux. Kudos to all the Linux folks writing drivers, but Linux is always at least a step or two behind. However, this problem may be solved if the project that allows Windows drivers to work under Linux is successful.

      Frankly, I don't want most hardware makers to be writing lots of Linux drivers. I want them to build their stuff to use documented protocols (USB/Firewire/IDE/etc.) correctly so that their hardware Just Works everywhere. That way, I can pick up a piece of new hardware and have it run without any obnoxious CD loading, file downloading or kernel module installation whatsoever.

      That's the sort of ease-of-use we should be encouraging.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:The only thing stopping Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wireless card, oddly enough, is supported far better under FreeBSD than Linux, as are all cards based on the Prism 2.5 chipset. Wretched chipset.

    3. Re:The only thing stopping Linux... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also another issue. For work, Linux would be great, I wouldn't mind. But at home, I play GAMES. And there is NO WAY anybody is going to use two computer, one for gaming and one for work. I tried that, but everytime I wanted to type a letter or do some work, I always found myself booting the gamaing machine.. because it's the fastest.. and because I'm probably on it at the time.
      So games, running at THE SAME SPEED, and without ANY problem added could turn this around. Just think who install the most stuff for the adult now. It's the kids. And what do kids do? They PLAY.

      So: Ease of use, games, and everything else that work on Windows and then there might be a better chance.

    4. Re:The only thing stopping Linux... by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 1

      Growth happens at the edges. In order to prosper in an environment with an 800 pound gorilla, may I recommend going after what is not worth the gorilla's time? Traditionally for Linux this has ment going after markets who simply cannot afford or who do not wish to pay MSFT's high prices. Companies in cost cutting mode, schools, and non-profits fit into this category.

      Unfortunately, resistance to change is a part of the human condition. If you can overcome that inertia with stuffed toys or by exploiting the male ego, I say "right on!"

  47. well... by tuxette · · Score: 1
    at least you're not the guy on the treadmill who wiped out completely because he was trying to run faster than me.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  48. Well, root, on my Linux box, receives no spam... by mark0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... so no penis enlargement ads... Therefore, when I'm using Linux, I know my penis is not in need of enlargement. Reason enough for adoption for me...

  49. There's almost no difference by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

    You've obviously never seen a female Linux user. They look remarkably like the male Linux user: grossly obese, hairy, sweaty, smelly, lacking in social skills, and they often spit when they talk. It's anything but pretty.

    1. Re:There's almost no difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love a woman lacking social skills. You know, I don't have any myself and all these people around me who have them make me nervous. A companion having the same problems would be cool. We could explore the world together!

  50. Note to Microsoft by ektor · · Score: 3, Funny

    $40 billion would go a long way buying t-shirts and stuffed animals to woo users.

    1. Re:Note to Microsoft by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem with that strategy is that a stuffed clippy would just send people out to get a stuffed daemon and a stuffed tux, so they could make clippy into finger cuffs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. What's black and white with poka-dots? by RLW · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does Tux need a Tuxette? What does a penguin in a bikini look like?

    1. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by worst_name_ever · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, if there was a "+1 Terrifying" you'd definitely get it from me.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    2. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tub- errr- Tuxgirl!

    3. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by RickoniX · · Score: 1

      I must disagree with worst name ever, THAT deserves, if anything, +5 Terrifying

      --
      Geekleak.com - Silly name, serious geeks
    4. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by RLW · · Score: 1

      I scare because I care.

    5. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Kewl, new wallpaper for my computer at work!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, I thought you were the type who would like that sort of thing... (Also, that geekleak.com has some great stuff. Seems like I've almost seen it all before...)

    7. Re:What's black and white with poka-dots? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you assume tux is a male. did you look?

  52. i would decribe this... by musikit · · Score: 3, Funny

    i would describe this in the same manor i would describe there being few waitors.

    women trust women. and men like to look at breast.

    1. Re:i would decribe this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      women trust women. and men like to look at breast.

      What kind of nut job are you? Normal guys would prefer to look at more than one breast!
  53. mixed feelings here by tuxette · · Score: 1

    While I ought to be glad that these blokes are going over to Linux, I'm not too thrilled about why they're doing it. It just bugs me that they're doing it for testosterone-ego reasons rather than "Linux is an overall superior OS."

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  54. Three letters: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, that even "chick's" can run it,...
    B. S. D.

    Plus, "commoners" USE linux.
    Nerds MAKE Linux.

  55. Non existent quality control by RLW · · Score: 1

    The only good way to patch MS * is to remove it. MS Windows is the most successful virus of all time. It comes with a veriety of payloads some of which delete files, crash file systems, open back doors, etc. Patch MS Windows for good, ditch it.

  56. WTF by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the secret to acceptance of OSS is a stuffed penguin?

    Yay, a penguin, it's cute. What does that have to do with the use of software? I'll tell you. It shows the intelligence of the people buying into this.

    Look at what the software has to offer...Please!!!

    1. Re:WTF by eddiegee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well I have to agree that its is sad that people are swayed by toy penguins and t-shirts. But tactics like these are not for techies, but for the office paper pushers who will go totally limp the moment you mention all the technical wizardry that makes "Linux Oh So Much Better Than M$" The penguins and cute tshirts are a foot in the door to get these users to have a good first impression of Linux. Talking about stability and security won't do any good to these users. Until they actually use Linux its all just talk. The first time one of their pals using Windows bitches about the Outlook Virus of the Week they will then start to "get it"

    2. Re:WTF by Malek+the+Damned · · Score: 1

      You're perfectly right. Any techie worth his paycheck already knows what's going on with linux. It's the tech-illiterate, scared-of-deleting-the-internet end users, salespeople and (most importantly) managers that need to be swayed.

      Where tech-talk fails, a cuddly stuffed penguin presented by this girl might just do the drink.

      Hell, I'd format on the spot. ;)

  57. I'm not so sure about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Male ego stopped anyone claiming that Linux was difficult to use, once they'd seen that the 'weaker sex' could master it :)"

    My Malibu G.I. Joe tells me "Linux is Hard."

  58. What about ./ personals? There are plenty! by blorg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What, you haven't seen the "She thinks Tux is cute" ads, etc. Ok, maybe you're a subscriber. Offtopic, but I never told ./ my gender, yet the ads *always* feature women. You don't have to put 4 together to be a bit suspicious of the gender balance there...

  59. Women... by derphilipp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Women...
    harder to understand than klingon,
    harder to handle than SAP,
    harder to resist than an open telnet port...

    Ain't women what we all do this for ?

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
  60. I for one... by jbrader · · Score: 1

    am all for it. Nothing like a little social engineering at the office.

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  61. 1 is a direct consequence of 2 by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only reason companies don't release driver's for Linux is because "no one uses Linux". "Everyone uses Windows", they think, "so we can capture most of our market by just working on Windows."

    Of course, this isn't true anymore, and slowly, as more people are using Linux, more companies are realizing that Linux is worth supporting.

    This doesn't apply just to drivers, it applies to specialized software as well.

  62. linux sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i still don't see why anyone would actually use linux or any of its bastard children.

    1. Re:linux sucks by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Have you considered the possibility of your own stupidity being a factor in this?

      So how long before the "Why sentences in English start with capital letters" lesson were you thrown out of school?

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:linux sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do sentences start with capital letters? It seems a little pointless.

  63. hahha by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    pure, undillute genius. good work, guys. :P

    I'll keep that tactic in mind for future reference.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  64. Buff chicks. by RLW · · Score: 1

    Your woman must be really stout. German?

  65. M$ mascot? by antarctican · · Score: 1

    Hmm, makes me wonder how long until M$ comes out with some cutsie mascot.

    And I can see the commercial for Windows Longhorn now.... Heather Graham laying across an oversized Windows box.... now that's sex appeal! ;)

    1. Re:M$ mascot? by frink_exp · · Score: 1

      what - the butterfly doesn't count as a mascot?

      --
      'Q' is for Dr. Tran
    2. Re:M$ mascot? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      Has anyone else noticed the paradox? "Micro" and "soft" vs "long" and "horn".

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  66. It's not that hard, stupid! by dacarr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My wife mastered it after a year away from OS/2. I have a half-blind neighbor who is getting there, coming from being a 12:00 flasher on Windoze. Many people in the group I hang out with is involved with this, and many of *them* aren't that technically inclined.

    So... how hard is it, really?

    --
    This sig no verb.
  67. Its What you are used to by Revek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The problem with migration from windows to linux is really a question of what you are used to. People gripped a lot when microsoft made its migration from windows 3.11 to windows 95. They could not find their programs, screensaveers, etc.etc. The gnome or kde desktops with koffice work just fine. They may not contain all the bells and whistles of microsoft products but they are fully functional. They may have trouble with printers or external devices but I have to show one lady how to print to a different printer on her machine on a weekly basis. Users will get used to anything. After all they got used to haveing to restart twice a day. Personally for me a move to linux would reduce the number of virus ladden emails I can't convince them not to open. It would also reduce the spyware I have to clean off weekly.

  68. As long as it isn't marketed as OS for chicks by PaneerParantha · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Be careful. It is a all nice and well that the so-called weaker sex can handle it. But if it gets that chick "stigma", Linux goes the way of Dodo.

  69. Wait a minute, by RLW · · Score: 1

    Hold on there pal. There's nothing wrong with knowledgable babes. Surely ther are some hot chicks out there who also know linux, right?

    1. Re:Wait a minute, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, sure, right next to the intelligent President Bush...

    2. Re:Wait a minute, by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Or next to calm and rational Dean...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  70. Serious Linux Questions by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    I've got a question or two along these lines. Is there a common binary format that I can distribute Linux software in? Or do I still have to ship the source and have my users compile it themselves?

    This is a real question, not a troll. I'm going to be recommending whether to do a Linux version of some commercial software. I need to know if I can ship a single binary like we do on Mac and Windows.

    Also, is there an installer other than Install Anywhere that works in Linux?

    Can I target all Linux distros easily with a C/C++ app?

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    1. Re:Serious Linux Questions by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's been done, but I'd love to see an 'idiot-proof installer' for Linux... you know, download ONE file, run it, and it has enough of an IQ to do whatever it needs to to tailor itself to your OS.

    2. Re:Serious Linux Questions by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      "Maybe it's been done, but I'd love to see an 'idiot-proof installer' for Linux... you know, download ONE file, run it, and it has enough of an IQ to do whatever it needs to to tailor itself to your OS."

      Take a look at game installers like the ones for Quake III or Unreal Tournament.

    3. Re:Serious Linux Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats's the loki installer. for more info see here

    4. Re:Serious Linux Questions by cr0sh · · Score: 1

      It mainly has to do with static vs. dynamically linked libraries - Loki shipped its games mostly statically linked (with the exception of X and a few other libraries, IIRC) - so the installer just installed this huge set of files, etc. This isn't a big deal (much) for a game, for other things it would be a real issue.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    5. Re:Serious Linux Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably ... the way OpenOffice does it is that they ship it with most requiered libraries included

      the biggest problem is usually downward compatibility with glibc. A program compiled against e.g. glibc 2.2 won't run on systems with 2.1 but usually run fine on 2.3

      binary compatibility isn't that bad anymore. A good example is that just yesterday I found an old program I compiled over two years ago and it still worked ... even though I switched from kernel 2.4, gcc 2.9.5 and glibc 2.2 to kernel 2.6 gcc 3.2 and glibc 2.3

    6. Re:Serious Linux Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, there is still no compiler that will compile a binary that runs on both RedHat/Intel and LinuxPPC. It may be possible, but it's not done, and it would take up a lot of space.

    7. Re:Serious Linux Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're trying to be funny. Trying being the operative word here...

  71. Re:Janet Jackson by emptybody · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She has won.

    She was disappearing from the public radar.
    She was loosing her celebrity status.

    On Tuesday following the half time show she was:
    on the cover of 8 different magazines at B&N
    on the cover of a number of local papers
    in the headlines on more magazines and papers
    on every news cast
    in various articles inside the various media formats

    AND,
    her name continues to be brought up in obscure places like slashdot.

    --
    comment directly in my journal
  72. Part of bigger move to Open Source in German Govt by blorg · · Score: 3, Informative
    SuSE is a logical choice given that it's a German company but this is part of a much larger move towards Open Source by the German government, which has been going on for some time now. They did a deal with IBM to let agencies buy IBM hardware and SuSE software at discounts competitive with MS. They are doing this, according to the Interior Minister, because "We raise the level of IT security by avoiding monocultures, we lower the dependency on single software vendors, and we reach costs savings in software and operation costs."

    The difference with MS is that while using SuSE, due to the nature of Open Source they are not tied to and reliant on a single vendor. This is just the latest town to so convert, albeit with interesting staff-persuasion tactics!

  73. Nah keep it by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    The day I see a stuffed "Clippy" is the day I finally go over the edge and start to hurt someone.

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  74. You know what that means? by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's it, I'll switch to hurd.

    The number of people using hurd just doubled!

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:You know what that means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, why'd that have to happen? Now I have to stop using it since it has gotten popular.

    2. Re:You know what that means? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The number of people using hurd just doubled!

      About to double, still.

  75. Arbeit... by boy_afraid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arbeit macht das Leben suss!!

    1. Re:Arbeit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      suss? Don't you mean SuSE?

  76. This woman doesn't... by IchBinDasWalross · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's photoshopped. If you zoom in on the "LINUX" on her panties, the color of the text is #FFFFFF. That doesn't happn in real life.

    --
    Mod "Overrated" instead of replying "I disagree with you," you coward.
    1. Re:This woman doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What were you looking for that you zoomed that far in?

      back to your cave, slave.

    2. Re:This woman doesn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And you were zooming into her panties why??

  77. Fairer? by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    Rule 1: The woman is always right Rule 2: In case the woman is wrong See Rule 1.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  78. Swedish Bikini Team by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    I wonder if even the Swedish Bikini Team on the side of a Compaq box would help much.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  79. This is a great day by The+Bungi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Someone has just come up with step 2:
    1. Write free software
    2. Promote using techie bimbo and assortment of stuffed toys (was: ???)
    3. Profit!
    A great day indeed.
  80. B29 Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A similar strategy was used in WW2 to get pilots to accept the B29 bomber, which was considered difficult to fly.
    The male pilots decided that it was flyable when a crew of female pilots were trained to fly it.

  81. My commandline... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    ... is L_O_N_G_E_R than yours! Order your F.R.E.E. herbal Generic software NOW!!!

    --
    C|N>K
  82. Not a great idea by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I cant imagine this being a very successful company, when they have to use bribes and sex to encourage the employees to use a tool you've mandated.

    Right, that's a good management style. Make unilateral, completely unpopular decisions with no effort to win people over or assuage their fears. Great management style. In general, having employees not hate management is a good thing. Especially since all it cost here was a couple of t-shirts and stuffed toys.

    How about this approach... "Use the damned software!". Really, I dont know why people seem to think they should have complete freedom on a computer at work. The company owns the machine, and the company chooses the software... so long as the company involved the proper employees in evaluating which is the best software(s) to use... thats it, end of story. Employees really shouldnt have a choice one way or another.

    Again, treating your employees like shit is a great way to kill morale and drive them away from the company. I'm assuming you're not a manager.

    So instead, you get this boneheaded company in germany, that is now going to have a number of mail employee's that have no clue how to use the software, and thus loose productivity, because there ego refuses to let them be beat by a girl?!?!

    Management wouldn't do it if they didn't think it was a good idea, and that's another issue. They were doing what they had to in order to overcome linux-phobias. And they did a great job.

    Besides that point... does male ego really apply that much to intellectual persuits? I mean, do most people think men are better then women at using a computer because of genetics? I doubt the number is high.

    Really? There's not a perception that males are better at computers than females? Because as it stands, 90+% of CS grads are male, for whatever reason. The old "no girls on /." joke is so old, yet true, that it's just taken for granted. Yes, many men are unwilling to admit a woman can do ANYTHING better than they can. And you'd be surprised, evidently, about their distribution - it's not all neanderthal plumbers, but doctors, lawyers, and computer engineers too.

    1. Re:Not a great idea by Serapth · · Score: 1

      Right, that's a good management style. Make unilateral, completely unpopular decisions with no effort to win people over or assuage their fears.

      People keep missing this point. The decision is already made!!! They already decided to switch to Linux, now they are just trying to get people on board. They put the horse before the cart and now are in damage mode. Had this not been the case... hey, having a celebration to make something more popular, im all for that! But no, this is a case where the company did exactly what you just described... "made unilateral, completely unpopular decsions with no effort to win people over". This is after the fact, and they are trying to make the adoption go smoothly by bribing people or playing on their ego.

      Really? There's not a perception that males are better at computers than females? Because as it stands, 90+% of CS grads are male, for whatever reason. The old "no girls on /." joke is so old, yet true, that it's just taken for granted. Yes, many men are unwilling to admit a woman can do ANYTHING better than they can. And you'd be surprised, evidently, about their distribution - it's not all neanderthal plumbers, but doctors, lawyers, and computer engineers too.

      First off, yes, you will always have certain people that maintain whatever stereotypes their little minds can dream up. However, what you are talking about is quantity not quality. Im not saying that their arent many girls in IT, im just saying there is no or little sterotype saying girls cant be good at IT. Big difference.
      Now, apply that to an office setting, and anything I think you will get a reverse stereotype. Who do you assume is better with a word processor a guy or girl? Years of women as receptionists type mindsets, should actually lead people to the conclusion that women are better at using a computer in an office setting then men are.

    2. Re:Not a great idea by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      People keep missing this point. The decision is already made!!! They already decided to switch to Linux, now they are just trying to get people on board. They put the horse before the cart and now are in damage mode. Had this not been the case... hey, having a celebration to make something more popular, im all for that! But no, this is a case where the company did exactly what you just described... "made unilateral, completely unpopular decsions with no effort to win people over". This is after the fact, and they are trying to make the adoption go smoothly by bribing people or playing on their ego.

      You're playing extremes here. I never said a workplace was a democracy - sometimes, management must make decisions that employees wouldn't make on their own. That's OK. But that doesn't mean it's bright to ram it down their throats without any attempt to bridge the transition. And the linux team did it beautifully. Who cares how they do it. Yes, they bribe and play off egos. If it gets the job done, so what?

      First off, yes, you will always have certain people that maintain whatever stereotypes their little minds can dream up. However, what you are talking about is quantity not quality. Im not saying that their arent many girls in IT, im just saying there is no or little sterotype saying girls cant be good at IT. Big difference.

      And what do you think causes that disparity? There's either a perceptive or actual difference in ability, and it is very much widely believed. If you don't agree with the stereotype, good for you. But you're giving the average male far too much credit if you disbelieve the notion that many of them think they're better at most things, especially electronics, than women.

      Now, apply that to an office setting, and anything I think you will get a reverse stereotype. Who do you assume is better with a word processor a guy or girl?

      A word processor is a typewriter on a screen, and not many people would agree with its position as a metric of computer aptitude.

      Years of women as receptionists type mindsets, should actually lead people to the conclusion that women are better at using a computer in an office setting then men are.

      Yet strangely enough it hasn't. I believe your base assumptions are flawed, as I've outlined above.

  83. No.... by vwjeff · · Score: 1

    Obviously the person who created this was a lonely Linux lover. Say that three times-Lonely, Linux, Lover. Anyway in that case GIMP would have been used not Photoshop.

  84. Yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 Sad but true

  85. WOW! by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

    And now even here *ON SLASHDOT*!!!

  86. Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have expected such self-confidence from someone named "queen of everything"? Did that chip come with your shirt?

  87. the 'weaker sex' by vudmaska · · Score: 1

    well, most of the girls i know are stronger than most of the geeks i know on \., so i would not piss them off. they might kick your ass. :)

    --

    my other sig sucks less

  88. Linux does not need marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing hurts the credibility of a product aimed at smart people than a thick coating of bullshit.

    Look how far linux has come so far. From nothing. How did it get here? Technical merit and word of mouth.

    On the other hand, do you remember the very expensive marketing campaigns of the dotcom era? Where are most of those companies now? Why didn't marketing save the day?

    Doesn't Linux prove something about the power of community and intellect versus the grip of a monopolistic industry?

    Do you want to see this turned into that? Why?

  89. Hmm.... part 2 by MachDelta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, you're right - that was the easy way out.

    After all, i'd much rather prompt the girls to play with my tarballs and give my extension a header first (as long as they don't byte). Then they can finger eachother and play with their nodes while I cool off, before we all compile. I won't dev into the core details, but it would involve loading a large driver and lots of fscking and !banging.

    (And remember kids: No networking without a firewall!)


    Better? ;)

    1. Re:Hmm.... part 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, r o f l

  90. Update your sig or your site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not Found The requested URL /features/ was not found on this server. Apache/2 Server at www.retardist.com Port 80

  91. Re:Janet Jackson by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well,

    do we need a how to edit adult pics with gimp tutorial?

    Do we need a naked Linux Torvalds in order to promote Sauna - Linux?

  92. If you have to prove... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you're in trouble.

    Look around you: is it true that everyone does not listen to you because of sexism? I ask you because I'm not such kind of guy. I have never ever considered women less intelligent.

    A really brilliant woman navigates right through the prejudice, and never gives a damn about it. When I see some girl fight sexism, I think 2 things:
    1) The idiots around her can't see her value and
    2) She's also a fool for paying too much attention to idiots.

    After all, everyone can deny respect. You can be good enough to be president or queen -- and still people can choose to mock you.

    Respect yourself, because that's about the amount of change you can provoke at your limited human reach.

    Regarding people helping you, maybe you're pretty. Men always attempt to get closer to pretty girls, this is a male peculiarity. I'm sure you'll find the same in yourself, like seeing a handsome guy and foolishly supposing appearance could have any relation to personality.

    > Don't question my intelligence, I know what I'm doing.

    Yeah, right. I hear this from a lot of men. You know what, if you really do know what you're doing, that would be a first in my experience -- including me! So allow me to doubt you, as much as I'd love to be kind and agree.

    BTW, I don't equate 100% of overconfidence with male egos. Overconfidence and shyness are both dumb and present in men and women.

    Ok, everything above is just opinion. Have a nice day (or night).

  93. Campaigns by Solokron · · Score: 2, Funny

    If only Dean would have spent all that money on stuffed animals instead.

    --
    30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
  94. MOD PARENT UP - HAS GOOD POINT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who would have expected such self-confidence from someone named "queen of everything"? Did that chip come with your shirt?

    Mod this fella up guys

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP - HAS GOOD POINT by fltsimbuff · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the nickname of the person has to do with the quality of the post. Now, for my opinion on the whole matter... bear with me, and consider it with an open mind please... The fact is, there are simply more men in technical fields, because they are more technical. Not because of some difference in intelligence, but because there seem to be far more men interested in technology than women (this is speaking generally, there are plenty of exceptions)... I choose to see men and women as "different, but equal"... There are strengths and weaknesses that have a basis in our DNA. Men tend to be more interested in how things work, and thus end up in technical fields. Now a woman that is just as interested has nothing stopping her from being just as good. I wish there were more of them, but from experience I have found they there is a lack of interest. Just as an example to elaborate a bit: I am a techie. Yeah. That dreaded technical support guy you get on the phone when you call your ISP because your connection is down. One of many drones that follow scripts, and aree trained in-house with the minumum of information needed to troubleshoot. That said, I have always been interested in troubleshooting, and PCs in general, and I'm quite good at it... That gives me an edge when troubleshooting. What is my point? Well, the ratio of men to women here is unfortunately around 20:1. The majority of male agents here are here because they are interested in PCs, and have troubleshooting experience. Though there is also a large percentage that are just here because they need the job. Of the women here, I know of none that actually do this because they are interested. It is simply a job. They are excellent with the customer service aspects, but, like nearly half of the guys, they do not have the technical interest to come up with their own solutions to problems. Sales and Billing departments tend to have a much larger number of women, probably because that area does not draw much interest from men, and because women seem to be much more comfortable for most people to talk to. So, my whole point is my belief that it is not because of preconceptions alome that there are not many women in the field, it is patially due to their lack of interest. Let's face it, genetically we are different, physically we are different, and we even think differently. There are going to be certain jobs that draw more interest from one gender than the other. That said, I believe that any woman interested in the field should jump into it. Do whatever suits you. People treating you as if you don't know anything about it just gives you an advantage in many situations. Suprise them. These opinions are based purely on my experience. Yours may vary, so feel free to express them.

    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP - HAS GOOD POINT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering it as "just a job" can be an advantage too. I'm interested in computers, but my work is not the specific fields I'm interested in (there is only so many game programmers in the world), so I tend to get bored, and feel I'm not doing my job well. And somehow my boss gets that feeling too, although he wouldn't want me to leave. I talk a lot to one of the female programmers, and she is no geek, I think for her it's just a job. But she gets the work done, always working hard.

      I have never seen her post to slashdot at work. (Which reminds me, I better get something done).

  95. Open Source Solves One Problem, Free Another... by cmholm · · Score: 1
    I agree, that open source doesn't market because it's there to solve a specific problem, rather than to create another Bill. Free software is software to solve a specific problem too, starting with an NDA standing between a programmer and a printer driver bug fix. I realise the driving force behind Open software tends to be more practical (I can make this product work better) than political Free software (I can make this product). However, without freedom of action, Open software might find itself squished between the politics of Commercial software.

    Open source needs marketing to increase market share as much as Commercial software does. Without it, a programmer is more likely to run into a situation where she can't make the software better because she's not allowed to. Is force to drive the marketing different? Sure, but it's still there.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  96. Email IBM by Dog135 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If I were you, I'd email IBM. I bet they'd love to use her for a commercial or two.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  97. Strong women by Dog135 · · Score: 0

    My wife has a goat hobby farm, and she moves the 100# bales of hay and 80# bags of feed by herself. The only time I need to help her is when we have to unload an entire truck load of hay/feed.

    She also pounds all of our fence posts by hand. Her hands are rougher then mine. Heh

    She's only 5'3" (a foot shorter then me) but she's tough!

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  98. Easy enough... by qtp · · Score: 1

    Gotta keep the spin "Easy enough for *her*, so you can certainly handle it."

    That's clearly the wrong spin to get the men to willingly try Linux, you need to chalenge the (most often misplaced) confidence in male superiority.

    "It was easy for *her*, but some of you may run into difficulties. Just ask *her* for a little help."

    As a male, I can safely say that no such chalenge can ever go unanswered, even if we know that the fix is already in.

    --
    Read, L
  99. Hey it was s'posed to be funny, not flamebait by PaneerParantha · · Score: 1

    What do you think there was to use for bait and for whom?

  100. Realistic demographic of NYC, actually by lysium · · Score: 4, Funny
    The ratio to good-looking women to men was 2 to 1.

    Welcome to New York City! I am one of six straight men in an office of 400 (Facilities staff not taken into account). It truly is refreshing working with so many women.

    However, two points worth taking into account:

    • *Half are neurotic. Terribly, terribly neurotic.

    • *Most of the rest are killers looking for someone far above your earning potential.

    So come on over! You'll have a great time dating around here.

    ==---------==

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:Realistic demographic of NYC, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Half are neurotic. Terribly, terribly neurotic.
      Yes, but do they fuck?

      *Most of the rest are killers looking for someone far above your earning potential.

      Once they find that someone, do they still 'rough it'?

    2. Re:Realistic demographic of NYC, actually by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Yep, I worked at a place like that. Your breakdown looks quite accurate.

  101. No more geek sex jokes ... okay, *one* more by duck_prime · · Score: 3, Funny
    These booth girls... if i'm new to Linux, will they 'mount' my 'hard drive'?
    With an attitude like that, you likely won't get any fast physical I/O without a lot of cache.
  102. Re:Well, root, on my Linux box, receives no spam.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, getting a hard-on over an operating system is nothing to be proud of

  103. I can... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Funny

    "when I'm out running along a well used path in my town, there is no fucking way I can live with a woman running infront of me."

    I can -- the view is better. /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:I can... by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      The view is even better if you run in front of them... backwards.

      She might suspect something though.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  104. ignore it by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    because when the male-male-female, female-female-male-female-female and not-male-or-female-with-the-matrix-style-sexor-por ts come out, and we start get into the real body modification stuff whatever culture is still left dwelling on the differences between men and women is going to be consumed by anxious confusion and resentment.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  105. stuffed t-shirts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Stuffed toy penguins and Linux t-shirts helped to create an open-source love-in

    Why would anyone want a stuffed t-shirt? I mean, I stuff my pants once in awhile just for fun...*ahem*...but shirts, now thats just wierd.

    1. Re:stuffed t-shirts? by bakes · · Score: 1

      No no, you are missing the point. What do you think the T-Shirts are stuffed with? Cute girls.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  106. Amazing! by HuskyDog · · Score: 1
    I must say that I find this article astonishing on two levels:

    1) Why on earth does Joe User believe that his employer needs to install Linux before he can read his email and log his keystrokes? Surely its easy for a corporate system admin to do this under Windows?

    2) These council employees seem to have the bizare view that the computers they use at work are in some way their own property on which they can run any old virus laden game they happen to come across.

    Can I conclude that these views are widespread amongst lusers?

    1. Re:Amazing! by CaptainTux · · Score: 1
      When I worked as IT administrator for my city government I generally found this attitude to be the norm. Users seems to believe that they have some right to privacy on their work computers and that if you monitor them in any way you're somehow violating their constitutional rights (even though we had an explicit clause in their employment contract that there WAS no such right and that email and computer use was routinely monitored).

      Users generally don't understand how simple it is to install spy software -- even remotely on their computers and that there really is no expectation of privacy when you're using a work computer. Get over it people. It doesn't exist.

      Anthony

      --
      Anthony Papillion
      Advanced Data Concepts, Inc.
      "Quality Custom Software and IT Services"
    2. Re:Amazing! by a24061 · · Score: 1
      I must say that I find this article astonishing on two levels:

      1) Why on earth does Joe User believe that his employer needs to install Linux before he can read his email and log his keystrokes? Surely its easy for a corporate system admin to do this under Windows?

      It's amazing the stuff that people will believe! Is it possible that the minions of MS were spreading this nonsense?

  107. you by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    are just jealous because you can't get any :P

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  108. The Future is Open by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Yeah, in a few years maybe she can start dating the Linux boy.

    1. Re:The Future is Open by autocracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would you believe? All the "view" links involve closed codecs. Thank guys. Go IBM!

      --
      SIG: HUP
  109. FUCK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    OH MY FUCKING GOD

    This post could have been from 1999.

    OH MORE DRIVERS. OH EVERYONE USES WINDOWS!

    You are a fucking GENIUS!

  110. Re:Penguin Bashing by q-the-impaler · · Score: 0

    Mod me offtopic again, please :) My karma has been too good lately.

    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  111. The name for this isn't MARKETING. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's EMBARRASSING.

    Just a few minutes ago, Aunt Tilley taught me how to compile my 1st kernel, & when I asked her a question, she refused to answer. I can't remember what she said exactly, but was something to do with man pages, howtos & Google.

    1. Re:The name for this isn't MARKETING. by GlowStars · · Score: 1

      "man" pages sounds rather sexist too.

    2. Re:The name for this isn't MARKETING. by SirCrashALot · · Score: 1

      type M-x woman in emacs.....

  112. superbowl summery by budgenator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    1 commercial of the pre-pubescent "linux-kid"
    2 commercials for erectile dysfunction medicine
    1 half time showing of Jannet's titty

    I sense a conspiracy, time to get some tin-foil condoms! Just remember, erections lasting more than 4 hours require intervention.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  113. Not to mention the flies by denks · · Score: 1

    They used a woman so that the attendees did not need to bring their own deoderant to freshen up the room. If they had brought an RMS clone, the lack of showers would have made the room smell. That is not a good way to sell a product. It also would have solved the issue of the flies that tend to accompany kernel hackers wherever they go

    I cannot stress this enough. If you want to try to sell GNU/Linux, potential customers do NOT want to be swarmed by flies! This can be worked around by surrounding the demonstrator with a mosquito net, but it really is much easier just to get a sexy woman giving the demo

    If Linus had a group of sexy women hacking the kernel with him, as opposed to unwashed, unshaven academics, the whole world would be using Linux now!

    --

    I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
  114. UNIX Lyrics by Boawk · · Score: 3, Funny

    In the early 90's I worked at a company that had a technical writer who was responsible for editing our Intro to UNIX course. One day he was waltzing down the hall singing:

    "Going to grep my pipe and chown my sticky bits, yea..."

  115. Only in Canada, you say? Pity. by dandelion_wine · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but the faux-girl power ads are all the rage everywhere I look. If it makes her look smart and capable, and him dumb and clueless, it will sell if she's buying.

  116. Ah, reverse-BSD-is-dying-ism... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    I saw, somewhere, a drawing of the BSD daemon making Tux his bitch (as in prison). Does that count?

    1. Re:Ah, reverse-BSD-is-dying-ism... by RLW · · Score: 1

      Uh, NO! You really deserve the +1 Terrifying moderation!

    2. Re:Ah, reverse-BSD-is-dying-ism... by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Found it. With a bonus watersports picture. And I think the first picture I mentioned is an "All your base" joke, too.

  117. Re:Janet Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we need a naked Linux Torvalds in order to promote Sauna - Linux?
    -----

    If there were ever anything that could drive people to windows... *shudder*

    Where's the (-1, Disturbing) when you need it?

  118. The Holy Roman Catholic Church by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is responsible for the adoptation of Linux. Bear with me here. The idea of women being the 'weaker sex' is a product of the 1000+ year old war on pagan goddess worship waged by the Catholic Church. Women in ancient times were revered as sacred vessels of fertility. Constantine, later rulers and the Catholic Popes did their best to destroy the idea of goddess worship and make the women a secondary being, which was a major factor in shaping our society today.

    So when men are amazed at women's ability to use Linux, their amazement can be attributed to the work of the early Roman Catholic Church, which continues today.

    IFO was sold on Linux not by a woman, but by a penguin. I don't know how where the Church comes in there. The nuns in the catholic school I went to as a kid looked a lot like penguins. But I was never attracted to them. Really.

    --


    TallGreen CMS hosting
    1. Re:The Holy Roman Catholic Church by rritterson · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, women were already placed in a secondary role in Greek society, centuries before. They weren't citizens, and couldn't participate in the polis or vote.

      At the same time they were revered by men as sexual objects and not allowed to do 'manly' tasks. It is, in my opinion, this dual subjegation/reverence that continues to today.

      Plus, can you really that sort of worship as better than secondary status? It's just as condescending.

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    2. Re:The Holy Roman Catholic Church by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Informative

      The idea of women being the 'weaker sex' is a product of the 1000+ year old war on pagan goddess worship waged by the Catholic Church.

      Well, well, trolling against a religious group I see... I'm not in the habit of defending organised religion, but you're making my bullshit radar go off the chart.

      Women in ancient times were revered as sacred vessels of fertility. Constantine, later rulers and the Catholic Popes did their best to destroy the idea of goddess worship and make the women a secondary being, which was a major factor in shaping our society today.

      Yeah, next you're gonna claim that women had the right to vote in Athens huh?

      First of all, Judaism started a pogrom against godess worship 3 thousand years before that.

      Secondly, women have been considered the weaker sex in china and japan for aeons too, where they hadn't even heard of the Catholic church. Women in china and japan were forbidden from learning to write, so they had to make up their own "women's language". Hiragana and Katakana in japan, and I forget the name of the chineese one.
      What, did the catholic church pray for the heatens to embrace that woman-bellitteling you pretend they invented?

      And finally, the reason women are considered the weaker sex is because they are weaker. Is the roman catholic church also responsible for secretly weakening female olympians so that they would systematically achive lower performances than that of the mens? What secret roman catholic magic powers did they use to accomplish that? The gap has been shortening in recent decades thanks to illicit drugs and homone treatments (see the east-germany women's olympic swimming team from 1976 and 1980...scary!), but women still lift less, swim and run slower, etc.

      Jeez, using anti-sexism to spread racism...that's something.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:The Holy Roman Catholic Church by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      I skipped the proposed reason behind the Church's destruction of goddess worship.
      And no, they were not the first or last religious group to try to abolish goddess worship, BUT they were probably the most effective.
      But on to the reason: Some early pagan religions believed that the only way for man to communicate with God (or gods) was through sexual union with a woman. At the point of orgasm, it was thought that man and woman reached a state of nirvana (however temporary) that allowed them to get a brief view of God. The early Roman Catholic Church did'nt like the idea that people could communicate with God without first going through the Church. If the Church could establish the belief that the only way to speak to God was through the Church, they would be in a position of almost absolute power. The Church borrowed ideas and symbology from early religions, turning them to it's advantage. All men and women were guilty of Originial Sin, and could only be absolved by being baptised into the Church. Almost anything you can think of was considered a sin, and if you died before being completely absolved of all your sins, you would go to Hell. This gave the church a whole lot of power, and for a long time the only way to be absolved was to pay the church money to see and maybe touch a holy relic, which would guarantee your safety from Hell and Purgatory until you committed another sin.

      So, in order to keep folks from communicating with God through more conventional means, the Church made women evil, sex even more evil, thinking of sex something you will go to hell for, and so on. Judaism actually had a pretty liberal policy towards sex until much later in it's history, the Temple used to be a place where clerics and regular people would screw like rabbits until they reached a state of nirvana. This ended at some point, as all good things do, I'm not exactly sure when.

      Women were probably considered weaker to some degree for many thousands of years in many different religious contexts. It is interesting to look at how religion has shaped that perception, and how it has shaped the evolution of mankind (or womankind in this case)

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  119. Re: Only sort-of true..... by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem *really* is, most "marketing" is centered around lying or pushing around half-truths, so people hear only what they want to hear about a given new product.

    If "marketing" really equated with "teaching people about the product", advertisements would point out all the pluses AND minuses.

    Linux lacking "marketing" is probably partially because open source developers don't stand to benefit in the long run if everyone goes around heralding their unfinished work as the ultimate solution to a problem. Folks find out it's not, and then they're soured to the whole project. Developers, unlike businesses, are just concerned with building the best product they can build. Marketing is about generating *sales* and bringing in the maximum amount of *profit*. These aren't an integral part of the Linux requirements for existance.

  120. This proves 1 thing and 1 thing only.... by greymond · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That Sex sells...

    Any chick no matter how ugly can get paid for sex, and any guy seeing any chick doing something nerdy/geeky, makes her automatically attractive in the mind, if not physically by definition.

    I'm glad to see that a mighty superior all-powerful MS killer OS is getting people to make the switch by using squeek toys, scratch and sniff adds, and hot chicks in longerie. Yeah god forbid they try and get a larger user base by making the actual OS appeal to average non-techys UI desires and creating a more user friendly environment. Oh wait this is slashdot you don't care abotu those things here....

  121. Re: Only sort-of true..... by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 1

    I don't know how much marketing you've taken or studied but advertising is but a fraction of what goes on in marketing. Along with "corporation" and "profit", it has been a word the incites a knee-jerk reaction of resentment. Supply chain management, distribution chains and product development are all part of marketing.
    I'm not saying Linux should or shouldn't advertise. I'm merely pointing out an alternative reason to its slow adoption.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  122. Smart girls ARE sexy by Dog135 · · Score: 1

    I agree. Nothing sexier then a geekgirl sitting at a desk programming. :)

    Even if she isn't "sexy" looking, there's something about smart girls that realy turn me on.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  123. Linux binary distribution sucks by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent question, and probably the primary point that the original submitter didn't cover.

    Binary software distribution on Linux is a bitch. Unfortunately, many of the people that could improve the state of things are not in the least interested in doing so because "binary software isn't GPLed, and all software should be Free, so screw you". Frankly, this isn't a really feasible position to take, pleasant as it may be to say.

    The LSB has helped a bit. It standardized the existence of (a *very* minimal set, mind you) certain libraries. The C ABI has been pretty stable, but the C++ ABI has changed several times in the past few years.

    Basically, there are a number of problems.

    First, shipping something in C++ is out. If you go back even a year, you're going to hit systems that won't run with your binary C++ software.

    Certain interfaces, like DGA 1, have been deprecated. the X11 people seem to have little interest in backwards compatibility with DGA 1. Thus, software using DGA 1 tends to be flaky.

    Some constants change and libraries and software are not capable of handling non-compile-time settings. I tried increasing HZ in my kernel a year or two ago, and discovered that it mucked up all kinds of timing stuff, probably due to glibc assuming that runtime and compile-time HZ were the same. It made the animation in Dominions (Well-maintained binary software game from Illwinter) run proportionally faster, for example. This means that even static linking is not a good answer.

    Lots of libraries that folks might like to use are *not* always present. Frequently, systems include only one of GNOME or KDE. SDL is a common include now, but Clanlib, OpenAL, and Allegro are generally not included. SDL is not part of the LSB, so may not be relied upon (and as a matter of fact, old statically-linked versions of SDL have broken on newer systems).

    I feel that Loki is probably one of the best packagers out there in terms of folks knowledgeable about the Right Way to do things on Linux and how to ship binary software. They've had extensive experience.

    I have purchased or tried a number of titles. None of these was ported more than a few years ago, and were theoretically maintained by Loki up until they closed their doors, only one year ago. Of these, on my Fedora Core 1 system:

    * Postal seems to work

    * Alpha Centauri seems to work.

    * Kohan when patched does not work, though the original version generally works, with frequent XFree86-hanging problems when doing things like resigning a mission.

    * Soldier of Fortune does not work.

    * Heavy Gear II does not work.

    * Sim City 3000 does not work.

    * Hereos of Might and Magic works.

    * Railroad Tycoon seems to still work.

    * Postal seems to work

    These are not really great odds, and these games use *very* minimal libraries. SDL is the primary one, and Loki *maintained* SDL, so knew it damn well.

    Folks that ship binary software that interact more with the system have generally fallen back to releasing many copies on a per-distribution basis, and only supporting some distributions. OpenAFS is open source, and produced by some very capable folks. However, IBM also provides binary packages with OpenAFS. They essentially support only a few Linux distros (particular versions of Debian and Red Hat) and have to provide builds for each release. Their distribution page is quite intimidating to any vendor considering Linux releases.

    Illwinter ships their Dominions game and tries to be cross-distribution. The thing even uses 3d, but I'm also using it on a pretty mainstream (Red Hat) system. Not sure what problems might come up on a more oddball system.

    Basically, you can safely say that:

    * Linux software binary distribution is much, much more expensive and difficult than on Windows or Mac OS. There are many more targets to test and support.

  124. lol... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 1

    one of the women in my running group did the Canadian Death Race (google it and be sure you're sitting down while you do) and routinely runs sub 1:30 half marathons (I think she recently went sub 3:00 for a marathon) when you run with people like that you start figuring out that being male is not necessarily the advantage it's all cracked up to be (unless you're elite or you're one of the guys in my running group who go sub 2:45 in the marathon ;).

    Also don't forget that there are MANY really fast over-60 folks out there (I'm talking 40 minutes 10k fast), looks can be extremely deceiving when it comes to most athletic pursuits.

    Remember: there's always somebody faster/smarter/hotter than you out there.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  125. Everyone together now: by Scrameustache · · Score: 1
    I always help -- I guess I "get" the concept that I can lift more than almost any woman -- something about testosterone and being a lumberjack in my youth.

    He cuts down trees. He wears high heels,
    Suspendies, and a braaaa!

    He's a lumberjack and he's okay,
    He sleeps all night and he works all day!


    You asked for it ;-)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  126. MOD THIS TROLL DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone please mod the parent to this down.

    It looks like he was modded as "Insightful" of all things!

    Correct this mistake, please!

  127. Reminds an AOL ad ... by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    "So easy even grownups can use it."
    (And not only their kids)

    I'm NOT making this up (I somewhat wish I would).

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  128. Not latest but first by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    This is just the latest town to so convert,

    Actually, this is the first town (AFAIK even worldwide) to completly (as in "every server and every desktop") convert to Linux.

    Others that switched earlier, switched mainly their servers and not, or only part of, their desktops.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  129. Theres a name for this....Jolly TUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Setting up the "sexist" argument ("Even the women can use this OS") is even appropriate if that's what it takes to make decision-makers come around."

    Putting it in a vibrator will satisfy that requirement.

    1. Re:Theres a name for this....Jolly TUX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK. We've got embedded Linux in PDAs, phones, game boxes, DVD players, etc. Why not vibrators?

      !# /usr/bin/ooooooooooh

  130. Re:So Just how screwed up are these "companies"? by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    RTFA. Or just the abstract for that matter.

    One, it's a city council not a company.

    Two, in Germany we actually respect employees as human beings and dont treat them as "unreliable overpriced production ressources". But my sibbling posts put that in better wordings.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  131. HOLY FUCKING HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take a deep breath man. Careful with that temper, or you'll wind up in an early grave.

  132. Marketshare? by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    This wasnt about marketshare at all.
    Linux was adopted by the council for technical (security) and strategical (avoid vendor lock-in) reasons.

    When making a change in any organisation with more than two people, you will ALWAYS have resistance.
    People just dont wont to change, it is easier for them to keep it the old way.
    Actually, the article was barely about Linux, but about an insightful way, management handled this resistance.

    They were helped by the fact that Linux is a product that is LOVED by the people who made and use it. Because they love it, they made cute stuffed dolls to be able hug Linux.
    Nobody LOVES Windows (some people might like it, but I know nobody that LOVES it), so there will never be Windows stuffed dolls.

    So Linux won the hearts of its new users (that were forced to it) because it is loved by it's developpers and users. It may be far-stretched, but I'd include that in "technical merrit".

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  133. Women...Gay Geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ain't women what we all do this for ?"

    No.

  134. What's black and white with poka-dots?-A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An Oreo with the measles.

  135. Male ego != stereotypes [Was:I hate male ego] by TekGoNos · · Score: 1

    Male ego is a part of male instincts and will never change.
    When a male sees someone doing something and he's supposed to be better at it, he will have the urge to outdo the other person.
    I guess it's something about "conserving you place in the hierarchy" or so.

    Stereotypes are what govern the "supposed" in the above sentence.
    Unfortunally, even today children are still teached that "technical stuff is for men". So when a men sees a woman doing technical stuff, he thinks he's supposed to be better than her.
    (On the other hand, the same stereotype makes most women think, whenever they see something technical, "I cannot do it" and makes them call for (male) help, preventing them from learning it, therefor reinforcing the stereotype)

    Male ego is a part of the human nature that you have to accept. However, you can and should go against the stereotype that women are "technically inapt".

    Stereotypes do change. Not long ago - and in some cultures till today - women were considered inferior on everything academic. Today they are a growing majority at universities. (At least were I live).

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof for my post which this sig is too small to contain.
  136. Re: Only sort-of true..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux lacking "marketing" is probably partially because open source developers don't stand to benefit in the long run if everyone goes around heralding their unfinished work as the ultimate solution to a problem. Folks find out it's not, and then they're soured to the whole project.

    Yeah, and Windows is finished. Right. <grin>

  137. Won't invade anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hey, they're making progress!

    At least they didn't finish the demo by invading Poland.

    Can't get these Germans to invade anywhere these days. Look what happened over Iraq... lazy peacemongering bastards... tch!

    Bring back the old days I say!

  138. A Bug's Life by nikster · · Score: 1

    Hopper's speech to associates: ""The ants outnumber us 100 to 1. What if they figure that out?" "It's not about food; it's about keeping them in line."

    Applied to billg/steve ballmer: "... These customers get tied in for life in an ever-increasing dependency cycle with our products. What if they figure that out?" "It's not about Linux. It's about keeping them in line."

    The German govnernment, no doubt with the helpful advice of a certain very large Linux distributor, is beginning to figure it out...

  139. Offtopic: Your signature by Sique · · Score: 1

    Do something useful... figure out lossy compression for plaintext...

    Quite easy: Interpret plaintext as graphic data and compress it with JPEG.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
    1. Re:Offtopic: Your signature by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Good luck making the file smaller that way.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:Offtopic: Your signature by Sique · · Score: 1

      If you just want plaintext lossy compressed to be smaller than the original, then take out interpunctation ;) Without all those colons and periods your compressed file is slightly smaller as the original, and the original can't be fully restored :)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  140. Male discrimination by Quietti · · Score: 1

    Your part about man being patronized on any child-rearing issue, while women are presumed to have mastered it all upfront, it really hits home. Nice to see that I'm not the only one noticing how fathers have basically no rights and are presumed to be complete idiots when it comes to taking care of kids.

    --
    Software is not supposed to be about how to work around a useability issue. - Ken Barber
    1. Re:Male discrimination by Eivind · · Score: 1

      Just so that noone gets me wrong; I *do* think that women today experience sexist-based discrimination more often than males. I *do* think that we're still in a situation where the way we treat women is poorer than the way we treat males. All I wanted to point out is that it does happen to males too, allbeit probably less frequently.

  141. That was my last college class... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    In "Terminale" (last class before university) I had the good mind to take the A1 course (Maths+Phylosophy with additional Biology course)

    30 ppl, 4 guys, one of them gay.

    The ratio is weaker than your 6 to 400 but I confirm :
    MOST Girls in group are Neurotic (and if not, YOU'ill become neurotic after a semester with them)

    The killer ratio wasn't so important, the worst part was "girls politics" (Don't speak to that one caus he's friendly with that other that said *9sdfg* about the her/him/me), Hence the Neurotic Fugue I had just after graduating, where I made sure the class would be closer to the 50/50 "sane" mix.

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  142. Stuffed animals and Testosterone Pride by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Are the Germany councilmen (yes, men) closet homosexuals? Stuffed animals to wins their hearts but they can't afford to be seen in public being weaker than a woman? Call the Drudgereport! Sound the alarm! "German Councilmen Outed by Linux!"

    Kidding aside, this shows that everything is politics, salesmanship and psychology; even something as simple as choosing the best software platform.

    Congratulations!

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  143. Linux Tux toy by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

    I found a Tux stuffed penguin toy about 4 years ago. It says SuSE Linux on the tag. Is it a collectors' item?