Slashdot Mirror


India Woos Medical Tourists

aspelling writes "It's not only quality hardware and software that can be done in India for a fraction of the cost. BBC reports that India has a generation of world class doctors capable of doing joint replacement, heart, neuro and cancer surgery at their state-of-the-art facilities. Don't be surprised when your physician prescribes you a trip to Bombay. Indian officials are working hard with HMOs around the world to make this dream come true."

479 comments

  1. HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What is an HMO? Isn't it a facet of the American private health care system? There are no HMOs in the country where I live (Canada).

    1. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      In short, they're the people who, without having ever seen or met you, decide the course of your medical treatment based upon which is the most cost effective.

      Basically the opposite of a good doctor.

    2. Re:HMO? by shigelojoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      An HMO is kind of like the Black Knight from Monty Python, except that when *you* get both of your arms cut off, *they* say it's only a flesh wound.

    3. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So like a Black Knight from Soviet Russi... naah, nevermind.

    4. Re:HMO? by psicic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmmm....have to agree....HMOs are really just an American thing.

      The National Health Service in Britain(mentioned in the article) isn't an HMO - it's a...err...national health service.... you know...the idea that people without private health insurance have a right to treament.....

      Mind you, I'm Irish....so what we have doesn't even pass for a health service (HMO, nationalised or otherwise!) - in Ireland you won't be refused entry to a hospital based on your insurance plan...so you have the comfort of expiring on a trolley in some hallway after waiting six days for an examination!

      (Bombay is Mumbai? So is Bombay an archaic usage(like Bangkok is for the capital of Thailand) or is it just an Anglicised version of the word?)

      --
      Concrete analysis...
    5. Re:HMO? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      (Bombay is Mumbai? So is Bombay an archaic usage(like Bangkok is for the capital of Thailand) or is it just an Anglicised version of the word?)

      It's more that Mumbai is the "new" official usage. But I don't know where you got the idea that "Bangkok" is archaic -- it's a quite old usage; it's not what the Thais call it (that's Krungthep, for short) but it's the "official" English name.

    6. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >There are no HMOs in the country where I live (Canada).

      Yes there is. You just call it something else.

    7. Re:HMO? by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are no HMOs in the country where I live (Canada).

      Actually, yes there is... it's a big one too. It's the government. They determine where you can/cannot go for your healthcare needs, much like any HMO in the US.

    8. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They determine where you can/cannot go for your healthcare needs, much like any HMO in the US.

      that is so wrong.

      I have a broken leg, I walk into any hospital and they fix it.

      I need treatment for cancer, they send me to one of the hospitals which specialize in oncology, oh and I have a say in which one (an aunt just went through this, she was involved in the decision and what doctors she saw.)

      The "waiting lists" that the US Republicans like to spout aren't nearly as draconian as they would have you believe. If you're dying, you get in. If it's an operation on a hangnail, then you're in another line.

      Canada's life expectancy is higher than that of the US which lacks universal health care.

      You're just spewing Republican health care rhetoric.

    9. Re:HMO? by grub · · Score: 1, Funny


      I have a broken leg, I walk into any hospital

      With a broken leg I think you'd limp into any hospital. :)

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    10. Re:HMO? by justpeace · · Score: 2, Funny

      It stands for Hey, MOe healthcare: If your foot hurts, they poke ya in the eye. Whoop whoop whoop.

      --
      mekkalekkahi-mekkahineyho
    11. Re:HMO? by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      If U.S. was to export all the illegal immigrants to Canada, will Canada be able to support all of them? I don't think so. Many hospitals near the Mexican border going bankrupt due to this problem. It's so easy to blab about universal when you don't have to deal with as many freeloaders.

      As for the life expectancy goes, you don't think that factors such as less population density or pollution doesn't matter?

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    12. Re:HMO? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      I'm Irish too, and I would sooner face my chances with the Irish system than with the NHS in Britain. The NHS seems to be falling apart, unfortunately. Join VHI at low rates and you will get excellent service in the Irish system. Hell, even without VHI it isn't that bad (not that great, either). My brother lives in London and was recently misdiagnosed with AIDS. You read that right... misdiagnosed with AIDS. Imagine the terror, the havoc wreaked on his marriage, etc.

    13. Re:HMO? by addbo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I come from Canada as well and I find it very interesting that not one person has actually stated what HMO stands for... Health Maintenance Organization...

      I also find it funny the American comments on the Canadian Health Care system... I actually work for the local Health and Social Services department... and while it's true there is a list of approved drugs (the drug formulary)... the doctor gets to ultimately recommend whatever they feel is in the best interest of the patient... because in many cases the doctors here are on salary and there isn't such a thing as HMO's (who because of the profit motive may give incentives to docs to prescribe the cheapest procedures and drugs... that may not be in the best interest of the patient)

      I do not believe we have a direct counter part here in Canada for HMO... you could argue the government... but then don't the US state governments also set drug formularies and such? (I mean you can't just approve any old drug... FDA process and all right?)

      So can anyone actually explain to this canuck what an HMO is? I have the impression it's an organization with a profit motive... and from what I recall what saves money is not necessarily in the best interest of the patient...

    14. Re:HMO? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Also note that most drug companies make the vast majority of their profits in the US. If the US moved to a Canadian or European style system, one of two things would happen. Either drug companies would raise prices worldwide (killing the centralized health care systems), or else they would dramatically cut investment in R&D.


      (and actually, I'd argue with your statement that Mexican immigrants are freeloaders. Studies consitently show that they pay more in taxes than they recieve, it's merely a problem of distribution. So they might pay large SS taxes that go to Joe Shmoe in North Dakota, but they don't pay enough in state and locan taxes for the hospitals.)

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    15. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're a high ranking bureaucrat and can instead go to a military hospital.

    16. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... what about Beijing vs Peking? Two different cities, or a name change?

    17. Re:HMO? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I come from Canada as well and I find it very interesting that not one person has actually stated what HMO stands for... Health Maintenance Organization...

      Huh, I thought it was Hibbert Money-making Organization.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:HMO? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      (Bombay is Mumbai? So is Bombay an archaic usage(like Bangkok is for the capital of Thailand) or is it just an Anglicised version of the word?)

      The original name of the city is "Mumbapuri", which is a combination of two words "Mumba" , which comes from an ancient temple in the city called Mumbadevi (Godess Mumba) temple. And the prefix "puri", which means place. i.e Mumbapuri means the place of Godess Mumba.

      Mumbapuri over the ages became Mumbai, and when the portugese captured the city in 16xx, from the local king, they christened it to "Bombay", which If I am right means "Good Day" in portugese.

      Funnyly the later immegrants to the city , especially from Norther parts of India mixed the two words "Mumbai" and "Bombay" , and called it "Bambai".

      The british when they got the city from portugese, as part of a dawory , retained the portugese name ane the city was called "Bombay" since then.

      Within the last 10years, nationalistic elements in the Indian Political scene, lobbied to have the city restored its old Name to Mumbai. There was a time when these politicians were buzy changing the names of cities , historic places across india back to their pre-british names.

      e.g. of other cities whose names have changed.

      Calcutta :- Kolkotta

      Madras :- Chennai

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    19. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you giving free healthcare to illegal immigrants? No ticky, no laundry. If they're not insured, they pay just like anyone else. Isn't that kind of like giving a free tune-up to someone driving without a license in a stolen car?

    20. Re:HMO? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Drug companies will not have a major impact on national healthcare. Also, you are totally mistaken with your view that an increase in drug company prices will kill the system. It will make it worse, but not kill it. Even in Europe and Canada, the drug companies are not FORCED to sell their drugs for cheap or at a loss. All that happens is that the consumer is one large monopoly (the govt), so they can push prices down (just like how Wal-Mart can get better prices than any other smaller competitor in a fragmented market). If the drug companies didn't like it, they wouldn't sell to Canada, Europe, and others. Yet they do--at a profit too. If USA switches to universal free healthcare, it won't have THAT much of an impact. There will still be drug companies doing the same thing.

      Lastly, the amount of research carried out by pharmaceutical companies isn't that large (it's a big chunk but not like 80% of anything). If anything, more research is being carried out in universities, which are publicly funded. If government cuts funding to university research, it will probably have a greater impact than a few pharmaceuticals going out of business.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    21. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and from what I recall what saves money is not necessarily in the best interest of the patient...

      One of the main differences between HMOs and the old-fashioned fee-for-service insurance plans is that HMOs provide much better financial incentives for their clients to get checkups and other preventative care. Ideally, this keeps costs down by addressing health problems earlier.

    22. Re:HMO? by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      You're mistaking marginal and fixed costs. Drug companies sell to places like Canada at a high enough price to recoup marginal costs (the cost of actually manufacturing the drug) but not high enough to recoup fixed costs (the cost of researching and brining the drug to market). Think of it like an airplane: the marginal cost of adding one extra person is very low, you've got a bit of extra weight, and the price of the meal. Most of the cost of the flight would be the same even if the plane was flying empty.

      If fixed costs can no longer be recouped in the USA, then either they'll start getting tougher in negotiations with Canada, Europe, etc., or else they'll simply accept that it's no longer worth their effort to bring new drugs to market.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    23. Re:HMO? by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Hospitals in the US are required to treat emergencies, regardless of the person needing the emergency. The cost is filtered down through the healthecare system. The people paying for the system are the ones paying for the non-insured person. In other words, taxpayers are paying higher HMO costs, as it would be highly unlikely that an illiegal immigrant would be paying taxes. I see no real difference between a healthcare system run by the government and a private one (in their current incarnations). It's the working, tax-paying citizens who pay.

    24. Re:HMO? by goodbye_kitty · · Score: 1

      'Peking' sounds roughly like 'Beijing' when pronounced in the cantonese dialect so i can only surmise that when the first romanised maps of china were produced the chinese traslator was from canton.

    25. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, illegal immigrants don't pay taxes at all. If they did, they'd get caught. Unless you count bs like the employer paying half of minimum wage and saying the difference is because of taxes withheld. Legal immigrants aren't the problem, it's the illegal ones that don't play by the rules of society, but still get emergency room treatment for free (until they get deported).

    26. Re:HMO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be curious to hear your theories on how they avoid sales tax...

    27. Re:HMO? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Hmm... what about Beijing vs Peking? Two different cities, or a name change?

      Same place, different pronunciation. In Cantonese it's "Pak-geng", many Chinese words adopted into English come from Cantonese rather than Mandarin (typhoon, ketchup, for instance). It's amused me how using a name like "Peking" somehow labels one as a colonial imperialist. However, "China" of course is not what the country is called, it's "Chung Guo". (The Ch'ins were an ancient dynasty.) China doesn't seem to care about that. But no one tries to insist the Chinese use native pronunciations for Western cities or countries -- their words for foreign places are far removed from what they're called by the inhabitants. It's all lacking in any consistency.

      A lot of related words remain, though. Peking Duck; and Peking University is the offical name of the institution.

    28. Re:HMO? by coyotedata · · Score: 1

      Canada is not a country-now stop it already!!!

    29. Re:HMO? by Jardine · · Score: 1

      With a broken leg I think you'd limp into any hospital. :)

      Maybe in the US you do that, but here in Canada we don't take kindly to people limping. You walk strong and proud into that hospital even if it means screaming in pain every step of the way.

    30. Re:HMO? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      So can anyone actually explain to this canuck what an HMO is? I have the impression it's an organization with a profit motive... and from what I recall what saves money is not necessarily in the best interest of the patient...

      It may be difficult for you to grok if the concept of anything but Government Healthcare is inconcieveable. An HMO is a 'medical care business', sort of a combination of an insurance company and hostpital/doctor/lab network, where they keep the costs down by limiting the services provided, drugs covered, and so on. In the typical US system, it's completely a al carte, and everybody wants to make a profit on their piece. The insurance companies want to profit on the financial transactions, the doctors want to profit on their services, the hospitals and labs buy lots of expensive equipment, and want to make their profits too.

      The HMOs are all about cost controls. They are bigger than an individual doctor/hospital/lab, so and they buy in bulk. Everything from colonoscopes to malpractice insurance. And they have a cadre of lawyers staff to defend the company, when the contractually obligated arbitration fails. Compared to private coverage, they won't have as many fancy new gadgets in their labs, and you'll be waiting longer in line for surgery and medical attention. It's a bit gruesome to say it, but it's a lot cheaper to let somebody die on line than on the table. And you might go to the doctor's office and just see a nurse if it's nothing major.

      On the plus side, for minor stuff, it's a lot cheaper to get passable service, as long as you're not expecting 5 star hotel type of attention. It's more like 3 star. There's no chocolate on the pillow, but neither are there fleas.

      I imagine that the level of service and care in an HMO is likely similar to a national healthcare system. I know that it's similar to what I experienced with the US Military hospital system, which is why I pay for unrestricted insurance. Despite that, I would like to see the US have some sort of nationalized healthcare, as long as it doesn't make 'better' care unavailable. (I understand that many Canadians cross the border to pay for healthcare unavailable in Canada, or the waits are too long)

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    31. Re:HMO? by RKBA · · Score: 1
      Then why is it that most Canadians carry private health insurance in addition to the government provided health insurance?

      Why is it that some drugs (Humira, Enbrel, Remicade, etc) aren't available at all under the Canadian government's health plan?

  2. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 4, Funny

    Free curry on your 3rd bypass.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
    1. Re:Hrmm by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you are on your 3rd bypass, i'd say you've had too many curries already ;)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Hrmm by prichardson · · Score: 1

      I know you were joking, but eating curry will NOT cause one to need a bypass. Curry is some of the healthiest stuff you can eat.

      --
      Help I'm a rock.
    3. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curry can be damn near anything. As far as I can tell anything that looks gravy like and is indian is referred to as curry.

    4. Re:Hrmm by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Well thats good news, cause I eat quite a lot of it.

      I guess it depends on exactly what you eat though.. you could go for something which is dry chicken and rice and vegetables.. or at the other end of the scale you could have the stuff which surely can't be good for you..

      I had a meal (and I forget what it was called) and it was similar to a Kurma (made with fresh cream), except this was also swimming in Ghee, which is indian clarified butter.. so cream and butter.. and lots of it. I could actually feel my heart twitching as I ate it! I actually just picked the chicken out of the sauce and ate it with rice as I was so worried about the damage... :)

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    5. Re:Hrmm by Shant3030 · · Score: 1

      Curry is some of the healthiest stuff you can eat.

      It also works wonders for your social life.

      --
      100% Insightful
    6. Re:Hrmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doctor: First the good news: You can have your heart fixed in India for a tenth of the cost here

      Now the bad news: You will have to fly Ryanair

      Patient: hrmm.......

    7. Re:Hrmm by iconian · · Score: 1

      Isn't it made with coconut milk which is full of saturated fats?

    8. Re:Hrmm by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Curry refers to the final dish. So it can be anything. BUT curry also refers to the curry leaves (and curry powder that comes from it). So I guess curry leaves are healthy but that goes for any herb. Generally, herbs and spices are healthy for humans...

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  3. fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    which essentially means that people in developed countries just so much overpaid for what they do it is unbelievable!

    a cruel joke of the capitalist economy, as our socialist friends would say...

    1. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ya, I work 80 hours a week (legally that is, in reality I work much more than that but I'm technically limited to 80 hours per week), owe twice as much in student loans as the cost of my condo (condo about $82,000, you do the math) and make 40,000 a year. Sure I'm a resisdent still, but as a general practitioner I'll still work at least 60 hours a week, and oh ya, by the way, I won't be finished with training until I'm 30. I've sacrificed many of my hobbies and pleasures in life to do this. I spend much of my spare time reading to keep up with the lately studies. Do I complain about this? NO. Absolutely not, this is what I choose to do, but comments like this really get on my nerves.

      Also, I have to wonder what the legal environment is like in India? How much do these docs pay for legal insurance. Since some surgeons in the US can pay over 100,000/yr in insurance, I would suspect that might account for much of the cost.

    2. Re:fraction of cost... by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Thank god that we have the modern technology (planes, international telephony) to make it all possible, without those we wouldnt be able to make use of the massive resource that is India.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:fraction of cost... by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      Most people working in health care are underpaid(or at least not overpaid). All the lawyers working for the HMOs and those out to sue doctors are doing just fine. Nothing capitalist about that.

    4. Re:fraction of cost... by cluckshot · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah! Right! Overpaid! My Freedom and My Prosperity are not the problem. Your Poverty and your tyranny (Disfunctional "Democracy") are the problem. You don't solve the problem of your world with such thinking.

      If low wages are a blessing to a nation India is most blessed with this.

      There is an Acid Test for what works and what does not work in the world. If things get worse doing something it is wrong. Sorry for your Communist Friends("Socialist") but their stuff doesn't work.

      To be fair, the so called "Capitalist" stuff of today in far too many cases is nothing but a renaming of Massive Fraud. There is nothing Capitalist about it. Capitalism holds that investors get paid for their investments, the fact of 1% Discount Rate at the US Federal Reserve puts the lie to the idea that what is going on is capitalism.

      To be fair to the Indians, this actually is not their problem. It is a domestic US Problem. A trade war by the US Congress against the Americans. I know this may be a bit confusing so I will explain

      If India placed a tariff on US goods/services that caused them to be marked up by 150% (Total Price 250% of Cost)we would clearly say India had a "Trade War" going against the USA. Yet this is in fact what the US Government has done to the US Citizens. Their goods suffer this Tax while none of their competition must pay it.

      There is a profound effect here that Indians must recognize as a threat to them. This situation is actually not so much helping India though some may win, it is mostly something that threatens to destroy your economy as well. It already is hurting the America's (Not US) a great deal. This situation rather than being a benefit threatens your survival. You should want the US Workers to earn More. You should want to end the situation where parties enter the US Market and essentially LOOT it being tax advantaged over the US Citizens.

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    5. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Also, I have to wonder what the legal environment is like in India? How much do these docs pay for legal insurance. Since some surgeons in the US can pay over 100,000/yr in insurance, I would suspect that might account for much of the cost.
      You can thank the US legal system for your high insurance rates. Canada has a caps on malpractice suits so the lawyers don't go for higher and higher awards (like a contest among them)

      Our medical insurance rates are very low by comparison.

    6. Re:fraction of cost... by TomV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, I don't know. We British managed to exploit the massive resource that is India in the most disgustingly rapacious and murderous way for the better part of two hundred years, without planes and telephones. That's how Empires work - if the US is going to be an Empire it needs to get used to this.

    7. Re:fraction of cost... by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But the liberals will never allow caps on malpractice suits. Republicans, insurance and doctors groups wanted to impose a cap but the Democrats and trial lawyers groups opposed them. I believe they had a show down in Florida last year.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    8. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I too work more than 80 hours a week as a physician. Unlike the US, there are no regulations in how many hours you work per week in Canada. There have been many studies that compare what the average physician makes in Canada to other professions. For example, if you work as a plumber from when you are in your 20's you will make more money than working as a physician from when you are in your 30's (4 yrs undergrad degree, 4 yrs med school, 5 yrs residency). If I wanted to make money, I would have become a plumber like my Dad. I do medicine because I enjoy the job, even with all its demands (my wife is going to beat me for saying this!).

      If you want to go to India for your medical care, go right ahead. I will be here to fix you when you get back because in India, anyone can legally call themselves a physician. Unlike developed countries, there is no accreditation or legislated groups that oversee standards of training or practise in India. As for cheaper costs of medical care with high standards of practise, come to Canada.

    9. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lousiest excuses for gross overcharging I have ever heard. How do you get the $100,000 to pay your insurer in the first place? You have still not accounted for $400K - $1M+ per yearthat average(yes average)medical specialists earn. Why keep the quotas on number of physicians in the country? You lie!

    10. Re:fraction of cost... by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and how would you feel in the Rebulican plan when your right leg is accidently amputated and you can't sue for damages?

    11. Re:fraction of cost... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      > condo about $82,000, you do the math

      Thats all? Thats about 4,000,000 rupsees. You'll never get a flat in Bombay for that much.... maybe one of the distant suburbs or some of the smaller cities.

      > make 40,000 a year
      You might just manage to make that much a year *AFTER* you've been working a while and have established a reputation. Otherwise expect an order of magnitude lower.

      > Since some surgeons in the US can pay over 100,000/yr in insurance
      Ah ha!!! Thats it. I doubt most doctors would bother getting liability insurance in India, since its extraordinarily unlikely that you'll get sued unless you do something grossly incompetent.

      So its really LAWYERS who are screwing us over here (in the US). If find it shocking that a lawyer often gets paid thrice as much an hour as a doctor. To me, a lawyer is essentially cruft---an artifact of a legal system that is too complicated for a lay person to understand, to be dispensed off in an ideal situation.

    12. Re:fraction of cost... by tjstork · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes but we Americans are so good the Indians are volunteering to be exploited. They want to be indentured servants, they want to trade their own culture and national sovereignty away so they can get that cushy IT contract for Coca Cola or that Human Resources outsourcing for GE. Meanwhile, all the shareholders of both companies are safely in the US and the... oh my gosh, UK.. oh wait a second, my oh my you crafty Brits.. you just traded a military empire for the behind the scenes economic one.

      --
      This is my sig.
    13. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a cruel joke on capitalism, just the market correcting an imbalance.

      Look at that free market go!!

    14. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok, how is this: I am physics graduate student,
      won't get PhD until I am 29 an until then I earn
      less than 20K a year while working basically
      every waking moment (about 14 hrs a day/ 7 days a
      week). I will then be a postdoc for a few years
      earning about 40K and then hopefully a professor
      earning 70K or so. If all doctors worked as much as
      I do and had pay schedules as low I do we'd have
      more or less affordable healthcare.

    15. Re:fraction of cost... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      Who says you can't sue? And how would you feel in the Democrat plan when you can't afford the health care in the first place?

      My boss told me (we are in a health care related organization) that there is a doctor who was interested in becoming a surgical assistant because his assistant had more take home pay after factoring in the malpractice insurance.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    16. Re:fraction of cost... by jabberjaw · · Score: 1

      You do know that there are careers outside of academia for physicists right? Have you considered Shell or BP? Oil not your thing, well there is always the defense industry. A dove? Well, there is a place for you in communications...

    17. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it means that people in "undeveloped" are underpaid and live in conditions far below what they are capable of producing because of inept government and lack of freedom.

      Did you ever wonder how the US, a country that just 300 years ago was mostly barren and uninhabited, produced the highest standard of living for 300M people while societies 1000's of years old continue to produced medival conditions for billions of people? The answer is freedom, as is spelled out in a very short document that is the US constitution.

      More capitalism (aka freedom) will raise more people to US living standards.

    18. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I like what I do, thank you very much. And presumably
      docs aren't in it for the money either, right?

    19. Re:fraction of cost... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      I bet you could skip out on those loans, move to India and live like a king as a doctor making 10x the national average salary. AND not have to worry about malpractise insurance. Sounds like a good deal to me...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    20. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do not pay 100,000 year for insurance and I will not in the foreseable future, I will do general practice most likely. I stated some surgeons pay that much, you could add OB docs to that list. My insurance will be in the range of 10 to 20K per year when I am done.

      The people in medicine whom make large sums of money are those than do procedures - dermatolgists, gastroenterologist (from colonoscopies and such), and surgeons for example.

      Surgeons, whom this article is really about because they would be the ones affected by this, pay very large sums of money in insurance. In the 80's I am aware of some that made tons of money as you suggest. At present, I am not aware of any that regularly make $400K (Unless they exclusively serve the rich, which is a rarity). That is certainly not that norm. 200K is more like it, and that is gross. After insurance and paying for office stuff, that number shrinks quickly.

      However, surgery has to among the hardest things a person can go into. The stress in enourmous, especially in residency. Lets just say,surgeons are not known for their great personalities and they put up with a lot shit from each other and their patients. The expectations placed on them by themselves and their patients is very high.

      As far as quotas, I cannot comment, I'm not sure how or why they number of surgeons is what it is. I can say, though, the number of residency spots for surgery (as well as many other medical specialties) is greater than the spots that are filled every year. That is, there are many unfilled spots every year in the united states.

      I might also suggest that it is limited because it does take quite a bit intelligence among other things to be a good physician. It was tough for me to get into a medical school at all and I virtually had all A's in college and had difficult majors - engineering and science.

      If you want high quality doctors, you have to expect to pay for it. We have very high expectations (rightfully so) from our patients and weeding out those unwilling to work hard to be good and talented enough to do so, I believe, is part of ensuring good quality.

      Anyway, most docs aren't out to rape their patients of money. Covering all our expenses is, well, expensive. If we did not we'd go broke. Pretty simple addition and subtraction to figure that out.

    21. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      And like me, I'm sure you were well aware of that when you choose to go into academic physics. I do not feel sorry for myself nor you.

    22. Re:fraction of cost... by grigori · · Score: 1

      There's no quotas. Surgical residency positions are going begging now since the demands on surgeons are so high and fewer people want to take it on. The stats are publically available. It is not a way to make easy money, dude. Its hard work and the HMOs screw everybody and keep the money themselves.

    23. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      :)

      I think I'll stick with the US and my family! lol

      Not that I don't plan to make it overseas to do medicine where people really need it occasionally, but I'm very happy with where I am at despite all the debt. I'd make the same decision if I had the chance in a second.

    24. Re:fraction of cost... by alex_ant · · Score: 0

      You can still sue, just not for 300 billion dollars.

    25. Re:fraction of cost... by occamboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US spends roughly 15% of GDP on healthcare, while the rest of the first world spends roughly 10%. Docs in the US get paid roughly twice what their counterparts are paid in the rest of the first world. The average doc in the US makes $150k+ per year - after malpractice premiums. In general, malpractice is not a big expense, except for OBs and neurosurgeons.

      For this, we get medical outcomes that are not demonstrably better than those in other first world countries. In fact, our outcomes are probably worse: in terms of life expectancy, we're 48th in the world, roughly the same as Cuba. That's sad, considering that our per capita healthcare spending is greater than Cuba's entire per-capita GDP.

    26. Re:fraction of cost... by asdf+101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're woefully wrong when you talk about a lack of accredited facilities in India. I'm sorry to say, but it's apparent that you speak out of an unfound prejudice that discounts the quality of Indian medical institutions.

      I've only recently returned from that country and how it is progressing. This Harvard Medical associated facility is just the first of many similarly affiliated facilites coming up all over the country. John Hopkins has associates in the Indian market too.. I just can't recall their names. And there may be so many more initiatives underway that I'm not even barely aware of.

      Agreed that even all this infrastructure available today doesn't amount to much, but it's more that a step in the right direction for that country.

      And more importantly, for those in developed countries that can't afford to pay the high-cost of private healthcare, India offers a teriffic option to get treatment at a fraction of that cost.

    27. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I don't feel sorry for myself either. I am saying that
      if I can do it and if doctors don't do it for the
      money either then here is a reasonable payscale and
      workload.

    28. Re:fraction of cost... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It seems like your conservatism and your capitalism are at odds.

      Capitalism holds that investors get paid for their investments, the fact of 1% Discount Rate at the US Federal Reserve puts the lie to the idea that what is going on is capitalism.

      What's the problem here? I don't get your point.

      If India placed a tariff on US goods/services that caused them to be marked up by 150% (Total Price 250% of Cost)we would clearly say India had a "Trade War" going against the USA. Yet this is in fact what the US Government has done to the US Citizens. Their goods suffer this Tax while none of their competition must pay it.

      Actually, every country has taxes. I'm not Indian but India might even have a higher tax than USA. USA has one of the lowest taxes (for a developed country) and one of the lowest overall.

      Stop blaming taxes (which are already low in USA) and face the reality of capitalism. It seems as if you are in complete denial about capitalism! The cause is not taxed, but rather the cost of living.

      What is happening now is a direct consequence of capitalism. That's why capitalists support so-called Globalization. Many leftists have predicted it decades ago. The standard of living in USA is too high (relative to other countries). Therefore, the cost of living is very high. And consequently, cost of labour, manufacturing, and services is higher too. I'm not a capitalist but my view is that the only way out of this (and sticking with capitalism) is for the US dollar to devalue. The US dollar has already depreciated quite a bit over the last few years. It will keep dropping I think.

      Even if taxes were 0% in USA, and even if wages drop by 50%, it would be more expensive to manufacture something in USA than in a country like India or China. There is a huge difference in the cost of living. Even if you assume taxes account for 50% of the costs of a product (say bread) in USA, it will still be more expensive than in say China (which is probably 1/6 to 1/4 of the cost).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    29. Re:fraction of cost... by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Doctors are paid more, but the others are paid more too. This is more expensive country in general.

      As for the outcomes, one needs to blame not doctors, but the general population that prefer to gulp pills instead of getting healed.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    30. Re:fraction of cost... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I was going to say something similar... I'm in the first year of working on my PhD in CS.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    31. Re:fraction of cost... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I just love how capitalists love to equate capitalism with freedom. If the world wasn't controlled by capitalists, anyone using that argument would be discredited. Freedom has nothing to do with capitalism. Countries like Kuwait are more capitalist than even Canada (eg. markets more open; easier foreign investment; less taxes; etc). Yet, if you ignore US government propaganda, Kuwait is one of the most oppressive countries around. Similarly, Singapore is one of THE most capitalist countries IN THE WORLD! Yet it is totalitarian.

      Freedom will help but that's not the cause of prosperity (at all times). The US Constitution is not as "free" as you might think. Don't forget that women and non-whites were subordinates; don't forget that elites (similar to aristocrats) controlled everything early on (the vast majority of the Founding Fathers were extremely wealthy elites); many freedoms (such as freedom of the press) did not exist back then (at least in the form that it does now); and so forth.

      So freedom is not the answer to US prosperity. Instead, there are three reasons in my opinion:
      1. Mass Genocide: The settlers in USA basically slaughtered all the native Americans. You would automatically generate wealth by carrying out genocide. You are basically redistributing wealth in such a case. USA was easily able to capture land, resources, etc. USA "re-allocated" wealth from the natives to the settlers. This is just like how Germany prospered under Hitler because he started capturing other countries and stealing all the property from the inhabitants, Jews, and others.
      2. Capitalism: USA is the flag-bearer of capitalism. You can roughly say that USA popularized it. This essentially means that USA will have an advantage over other countries (this is generally true for any econopolitical system.) For instance, the economic policy in USA (by the Federal Reserve for example) pretty much sets everything else in the world. Other examples include the adoption of US dollar as world currency (this would not have happened if USA was not the key driver of capitalism.) Having said that, this comes with a price. Some leftists, like me, argue that a portion of US debt (possibly over a trillion dollars) is actually to prop up capitalism and prevent it from collapsing. According to my view, Americans are actually subsidizing capitalism (via entities like the IMF) whether they realize it or not. In this sense, it is disadvantageous to be the flag-bearer.
      3. Trade: Lastly, the most important reason why USA is prosperous: trade. By trade, I'm not talking about so-called free trade promoted by capitalists. I'm talking about trade of mutual benefit to both countries, where the benefits are shared. Modern "free trade" only benefits one party (usually the capitalists i.e. property owners.) It can be shown (in economics) that countries benefit from trade. I am not a capitalist and don't buy 90% of (capitalist) economics but this trade thing is a basic principle (has nothing to do with capitalism.) Two countries will ALWAYS benefit from trading--even if one country is worse at producing things than the other. If you want something more technical, look up 'absolute advantage' and 'comparative advantage' (basically first chapter of any economics book; easy to find online.) Ancient civilizations (like the Indians, Chinese, most Middle Eastern ones, and even Romans to some extent) became wealthy through trade. USA followed a similar path in the 1700's and 1800's. USA accumulated wealth by trading with Europe (mostly) in the 1800's. This is the main reason for the wealth of USA.


      Freedom would make little difference to some of these countries. Don't get me wrong: I FULLY support granting greater freedoms. However, people in countries like India are already somewhat free. It is a kleptocracy but it isn't a dictatorship or totalitarian.

      You can keep believing that capitalism is the path to freedom. But just know this: the day will come when your naive beliefs will fall apart. You will become a corporate slave under capitalism. Maybe you already are one... ;)

      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    32. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      And I intentionally did not go there because 1. that is a very simplistic and unrealistic thought 2. you obviously did not read into or think about what I stated in my original post. 3. i honestly don't care if you work more than myself or other physicans - expecting others to live by your own standards (no matter how high or low) is unrealistic - I certainly expect none of my patients to work as much as I do 4. its really not worth arguing about but now I can't help myself.

      I'm limited to 80 hours technically, but, like I said, I work much longer than that. The details: I work two 31-34 hour shifts a week on average on call, and my good days are 10 to 12 hours. This is very typical for any resident. If I get a day off its usually closer to 90 in a week. If I do not get a day of its closer to 100. Add in reading time at home and research I do on the side - who the hell knows how many hours I put in.

      About salary, I owe about $160,000 in debt just from med school alone (which is close to average). There is little/no time to work in med school so basically you live off loans unless you have rich parents. Then if I made 20,000 during residency as you implied we should and then earn 40,000 (or whatever salary it was you implied you might make) my entire life and pay malpractice insurance, wanted to have a family and support myself, no matter how much I want to do medicine, it would be financially impossible to do as someone who came from a low to middle class family. Perhaps I should have been more clear with the numbers.

      Medical education is not cheap, if you want good doctors you have to pay for it.

      Then I could go on to responsibility. Nothing against research, I've done plenty in my time and its fundemental to medicine, but its not like working 30 or so hours straight with a pager that will not stop going off with calls that range from ridiculous to extremely serious and its not always clear which to take seriously. Other people's well being and lives are not uncommonly at stake and the pressure to make the right decisions in situations that can be hectic is very very real. Second guessing yourself never goes away. You never can know for sure if you'd done something different maybe things would have turned out better. Simply, the hours spent working on a hospital floor or ICU are much more consuming of energy than any spent behind a bench.

      I could go on but i've spent too much time on slashdot today already and I am going to bed! :)

    33. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone can legally call themselves a physician

      I lived in India for 26 yrs - Trust me that is not true at all

    34. Re:fraction of cost... by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 1

      It is the result of your sue happy society. When Med students in the US finish college, they should come down here to Australia. You won't find insurance near that level, you'll earn about the same ammount of money (60k+ garanteed by the gov for uni leavers, translation is about US42k) and the cost of living is cheaper, not to mention our cities have a much higher ranking in the most livable cities index.

      Who knows, in time the US citizens may see there strife, and change their nature.

      --


      VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
    35. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, I'm in .au and the fact is that some specialties (notably gyno) are losing specialists due to increases in medical insurance costs. As usual, Australia is tracking the US by about five years :-(

    36. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Well, as I see it, malpractice insurance is not
      what you take home so it doesn't figure in your
      earnings. Factoring that out as cost of doing business,
      you can certainly have a family and support yourself
      on 70K a year. Heck, the median income in the US
      is like $30K.
      Basically, what I am saying is that even if there
      were no malpractice insurance and even if you had
      to pay zero for med school, medical care would
      still be non-competitive costwise with India because
      doctor's earnings are too high.
      Put it differently: consider a case of a simple
      family doctor with a busy practice with one nurse
      helping. In my experience most doctor visits last
      on average 15 minutes, so we figure the doctor
      works 10 hours a day seven days a week with two
      weeks vacation. That's 40 patients a day for 350
      days a year, i.e. 14000 visits per year. So not
      factoring malpractice insurance or debts into it
      such a doctor could charge $2 to $5 per visit and
      cover his salary. At $10 per visit he should be able
      to cover also the rent and nurse's salary. Maybe
      let's figure in subscription to med. journals and
      such and some equipment. $12 to $15 per visit.
      Now name a family doctor who charges anywhere near
      that. Or are you saying that malpractice insurance
      brings the rates up by an order of magnitude?
      Or maybe that doctors drop their rates once they
      have paid off med school loans?

    37. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      malpractice insurance is not
      what you take home so it doesn't figure in your
      earnings. Factoring that out as cost of doing business,
      you can certainly have a family and support yourself
      on 70K a year.


      Sounds like a plan, that's not reality.


      consider a case of a simple
      family doctor with a busy practice with one nurse


      again, unrealistic. On avg there are three people per doctor on staff for support. Yes, a nurse. Medical assistant. Then people to take care of billing - because of the complexity of insurance companies, you either have people on staff who understand them and do the billing or you contract out to an indepentent company. There are receptionists and schdulers. Give me time, I could think of more

      That's 40 patients a day for 350
      days a year, i.e. 14000 visits per year


      When you figure total amount of patients you are in part limited by call and someone has to take care of your patients that are in the hospital daily. You or one of you partners have to be available 24 hours a day to take call. One per on call can only handle so many calls. Many patients do not show up for visits as scheduled. Where I work, the rate of no show can be 30-50% daily. If you overbook too much, you risk running unbelievably behind.

      Also, just because you feel you don't need a day off, doesn't mean everyone else should be held to that standard. (didn't I say something about that) That's insane and unrealistic, everyone deserves a day off or two a week, especially if you have a family, you owe it to your kids.


      At $10 per visit


      Average visit charge is usually $50. See the uncomprhensive list above of expensises above.

      Or are you saying that malpractice insurance
      brings the rates up by an order of magnitude?


      as you can now see, its one of many costs of doing business


      Or maybe that doctors drop their rates once they
      have paid off med school loans?


      No, I make no apoligies for how much a doctor makes. Read about stress and such in previous post. Good doctors deserve what they earn. For every easy patient (ie. healthy) we see many more complicated and time consuming patients in a day. I'd imagine your perspective is as a healthy individual.

      Doctors salaries account for a small percentage of total healthcare cost and even eliminating them entirely would have very little effect on total heathcare expendatures. I haven't even touched on cost of labs, procedures, imaging, or inpatient stays, hospice, nursing homes. In the US, an individual on average will accrue by far the majority of their health care costs in the last year of life. I forget the number off hand, but its like 80-90% I believe.

      What is my point in all this? Again, it is much more complicated that you try to make it in your ideal world. Then again, my experience with physics professors and those types is that they tend not to be in touch with reality.

    38. Re:fraction of cost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has probably been said here already, but here goes. I am not being racist here, these are just my findings and probably do not apply to all people's experiences, but I've had a good many doctors, three have been Indian, and I have to say that my experiences with India doctors are just not good. If I had only one, I wouldn't be saying anything, but I've had 3, and they have all been bad. I've had to switch doctors too many times now because of this. I'm sorry, there are a few things I'm willing to pay money for, my life is one of them. You get what you pay for, sometimes is true.

    39. Re:fraction of cost... by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Ok, but is the $20,000 cap really going to compensate you for the loss of quality of life in this case? Nope. Oh, and under the Republican plan you aren't going to be insured either. They would rather businesses just did away with that expense altogther. :)

    40. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I don't know which one of us is not in touch with
      reality. The last time I went to a doctor with an
      ear infection, he took at most 10 minutes, prescribed
      some drops, notably didn't consult with any tests or
      with any other specialists, and charged me $300,
      which was under my deductible so I paid out of pocket.
      That was basically my life's savings for 10 minutes
      of work. Where is that magical $50 per visit bunch
      of doctors you mention. In Canada maybe but not
      this side of the border.

    41. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      That happened because you paid out of pocket. Doctors charge a wide variety for the same thing. For the most part, it does not matter what a doctor charges for anything, the insurance company pays them whatever they feel they deserve. Thus, a typical visit is reimbursed with $50. Since you paid out of pocket, you did not have the leverage of a large insurance company on your side and paid the full amount that in reality is rarly if ever paid.

    42. Re:fraction of cost... by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Well, first off my assumption is that I am dealing
      with honest people who charge me fair amount for
      their labor, rather than what they can get away
      with. See, if you guys always strived to charge
      as little as possible there would be little need
      to have an insurance company on our side, then
      more people would pay out of pocket and the entire
      insurance scam and the associated overhead would
      not be needed. But docs are greedy (as you have so
      beautifully illustrated above) so the overhead is
      needed but then you bitch that because you have to
      charge for overhead prices are high.
      Don't blame the HMOs or student loans or anything
      else. In the end, HMOs are needed so you don't
      overcharge, student loans are an empty excuse because
      prices don't come down once those are paid off and
      indeed the high cost of med school is only there
      because there is a concerted effort to keep the
      number of doctors down so their salaries are high.
      Imagine if every doctor paid 5% of their earnings
      for life to fund new medical school students. The
      numbers would go up, the tuition would go down,
      possibly to zero. AMA could do this if they wanted
      to. Someday someone will sue them for antitrust
      breach on these grounds. That, or we will have
      nationalized healthcare like Canada.

    43. Re:fraction of cost... by puck01 · · Score: 1

      One correction, $50 is average follow up visit provided by medicare. If it was your first visit to this particular MD, medicare would pay somewhere in the 100's.

      You can call all doctors greedy because one probably overcharged you, i'd call that a erroneous thought based on a single experience. You are scientist, right? You realize how valuable one data point is right? You probably didn't even think to call and protest the charge. Since most docs do not get paid for self pay visits at all, you most likely could have easily negotiated to pay a lessor fee. Oh yeah, I'll repeat, most of the time we get no money from self pay vistors. Did you get that? We see and provide services and medications for free all the time to people that more than likely will not pay.

      You can twist it however you'd like, though. fine, I'll keep doing my best at my job and making differnces in lives all the time. I'm done wasting my time acheiving nothing.

  4. oh great, first they outsource my job, then this . by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Not to knock the healing hands in India, but I just can't snicker at the thought of my HMO telling me that they've outsourced my hip replacement to the cousin of the guy who replaced my job as a programmer.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  5. it would definetly lower costs. by epicstruggle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to admit it, but they do have a point. Savings can be had by lower paying doctors, nurses, facility costs, you also get to eliminate malpractice suits. Real savings with the last one. Your real cost will be to ship the patient back and forth (around $800 to $1200).

    Hmm, Im torn between feeling bad for doctors/nurses, and happy that there will be less need for lawyers.

    later,
    epic

    --
    "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    1. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Less need for lawyers? The first time someone is maimed or dies under the knife when he was in India at the insistence of his/her HMO rather than in a stateside medical facility, there will be a lawsuit of SCO proportions against the HMO. Except the patient (or his/her heirs) have a good chance of winning.

      (While I'm sure HMO's will require signing of a waiver, I doubt the waiver will hold up when push comes to shove. IANAL, IANAD, and all that.)

    2. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by epicstruggle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes less need for lawyers, why? Because HMO's will offer you a plan stating that all non-emergency surgeries will be performed outside the US. IANAL, but it seems that if you agree to go out of the country for surgeries in exchange for lower cost health care, than all malpractice lawsuits should/would be handled in India. LOL, it just came to mind that we would also be outsourcing our lawyers to india.

      later,
      epic

      --
      "Im drowning here, and you're describing the water!"
    3. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by base3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh :). Unless the HMO becomes an India corporation, too, the lawsuits will be handled in the U.S. And you can be the insurance industry isn't going to let the profits go from Hartford to Bangalore. So the principals, if not the operation, remain stateside, and are sued right at home.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    4. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by swerdloff · · Score: 1

      "you also get to eliminate malpractice suits. Real savings with the last one."

      Ok, you go first. Hope nothing goes wrong, since you just said you'd have no recourse. :)

    5. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Vexar · · Score: 1
      There is a point hidden in your post: how and where do you sue an Indian doctor who makes a medical error worthy of a malpractice suit?

      Forgive me for not trusting them yet, but the Indian doctors in the Canadian health system seem to be book smart but experience foolish (much like their CS grads, according to an Indian friend of mine, also a CS grad). My sister-in-law had several miscarriages under the Canadian doctors in Toronto simply because none of them thought to suggest a check of progesterone levels. Needless to say, her first child was born under the prenatal care of some good, old-fashioned country doctors in Springfield, MO.

    6. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Doctors never make mistakes, and anyone who sues over a botched operation is just an evil, money-grubbing parasite who only cares about getting his or her ill-gotten gains. It's all a vast conspiracy by those eeeeeevil lawyers against the hardworking, honest insurance companies. That's why doctors pay so much in malpractice insurance that the average physicians salary in the United States is $14.00 per annum.

    7. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your real cost will be to ship the patient back and forth (around $800 to $1200).

      using commercial airlines to transport patients with life-threatening conditions becomes very expensive very quickly.

    8. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are aware that by law insurance companies ( including HMOs ) cannot be sued for malpractice? I happen to think given the way they currently meddle in care this is inappropriate, but it's still the way things are. The net result is you'd have no recourse in US court for damages due to surgery done in India at the insistence of your HMO.

    9. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      Wrongful death would work if malpractice isn't available. I do have a friend who won a rather large settlement from a doctor and an HMO for complications related to having been denied a Cesearean that resulted in a special needs child. Not sure if it was specifically malpractice that the suit would have been for, though.

    10. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Leeto2 · · Score: 1

      You assume that an American air carrier would be used. I'm sure the equivalent of "Air India" could probably make the same trip for a 1/10th of the cost.

      --



      "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
    11. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's not so much the successful verdicts against doctors that are the problem, but the unsuccessful ones. Every lawsuit costs lawyer time which ain't minimum wage. So although a lot of doctors have never paid out money, they still lost time from their practice and they are not awarded legal costs automatically.

    12. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by westlake · · Score: 1

      there are liability, logistical and PR issues for any carrier, the carrier will almost certainly not let you board without a full medical support team and their specialized equipment, you'll need extra space, at minimum the equivalent of several first class seats, insurance to cover the possibility of an emergency landing and a host of other issues...

    13. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by nizo · · Score: 1

      Perfect, instead of fixing our health care system here in the states we should just offer "free flights to India" instead.

    14. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by ksheff · · Score: 1

      IIRC, there was someone high up in the British government a few years ago that was advocating flying people to India for operations because it would cost less than having them done in the UK.

      However, when I'm sick the last thing I want to do is fly halfway around the world to be operated on by people who have accents I can't understand.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:it would definetly lower costs. by Leeto2 · · Score: 1

      Actually I was being sarcastic. :) You make a good point though. So what about the costs of flying an Indian team here? (Think H1-b or L1 visa) L2

      --



      "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
  6. In another generation... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 0, Troll
    ...Indians will have us by the balls. If we don't reverse this trend, Americans well end up working for them in giant discount stores, fast food restaurants, temp agencies, and--

    Oops.

    1. Re:In another generation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then we can finally acheive what we seem want so badly. Which is to be ignorant and culturally backward. Perfect economic fodder.

    2. Re:In another generation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as I can stay insanely fat, it is alright with me.

  7. Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an Indian myself, I actually found this funny.

    Oh well.

  8. had an experience with this by viniosity · · Score: 5, Interesting
    After seeing a number of doctors in SF regarding a kidney stone that just would not pass (over 1 month with the damn thing!), I had the fortune of being in Bombay. On a particularly hard day our local rep took me to see a doctor. While I wouldn't want to expose anyone to the conditions of this particular 'hospital', the doctor was very nice and actually took the time to explain what he was going to prescribe and what it would do. Within 24 hours my stone passed.

    This is in stark contrast to the jerk who 'helped' me in SF. "Yeah, drink a lot of water. That'll be $400"

    1. Re:had an experience with this by rsidd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm an Indian, so I know how good medical care is. Right now I'm in the US, but believe me, if I had a medical problem, I'd get it treated in India, and not just for cost reasons. They know their stuff and they don't treat their patients like idiots. (It's also true that I know who the good doctors are in India, and I don't know any here.) My relatives in Europe do the same: the alternative is go through the public-healthcare lottery in Europe (get assigned a doctor who may be good or may be awful), or pay through your nose for private healthcare.

    2. Re:had an experience with this by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Which European country are you referring to? Public health is run very differently in each country. In Ireland, France, Germany (and maybe others but these are the ones I have experience with) you may choose your physician and specialists. In addition, most of the doctors at large hospitals in Ireland are Indian, so, you know... what does that do to your argument? I haven't found them to be either better or worse than Irish doctors in terms of bedside manner.

    3. Re:had an experience with this by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 2, Interesting


      Well good for you. I'm glad that Bombay worked out for you. You shouldn't complain about customer service. The reason that you wait to get a doctor in America is that so many people can actually freaking afford to go see a doctor. Bet you just couldn't see around that, could you? Those go-carts and bicycles say that surgery is a little out of their league.

      What about the people in Bombay that are starving on their feet? I bet there are a ton. I bet they would love to go see a doctor. I bet that doctor could see a lot more patients and make you wait if the people there could afford him.

      Face it, India is not great with this middle class thing, because there isn't any.
      Yes. India is a wonderful land of harmony. This "more for me, less for you" thing has been in their culture for so long, so many thousands of years, that they have freaking castes that you are born into. CASTES! The poor are so downtrodden, they have a cultural name, and belief system that doesn't allow them advancement! You are not allowed the benefits of personal merit, you are "low caste" and "high caste." What a crock of shit.

      I know a family from India that I am very tight with. The father left for America because he was the most brilliant man I have ever met, and India recognized that. He married above his caste, which was the poorest caste of them all, to one of the highest. His children are great. Brilliant and handsome and beautiful. Don't get me wrong, I believe in this country.

      However, I knew girls that were going to college in America from India that were great at tennis, and they hired boys to go chase tennis balls for food money. FOR FOOD MONEY. As many as they needed, to practice their swing.

      Yeah, India is the land of peace and good prosperity. Goody for your kidney stone. Not so hot for the walking starvers.

    4. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once had a throat infection in India. The doctor diagnosed the problem and gave me medicine for it for 20 Rupees (less than 50 cents). I did not have to present insurance or even make an appointment. There were more people at that doctor's office than there ever are at my doctor's office here, but even still I got treated much faster. The wait for a nurse, explain your problems, wait for the doctor, explain your problems again, leave after an hour-and-a-half with a lighter wallet thing simply does not happen there.

    5. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know their stuff

      Like Indian Techs know their stuff?

    6. Re:had an experience with this by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You seem to be indirectly implying that people prefer doctors from their own culture. This does not make out-of-culture doctors "bad" per se, but just that the mismatch makes each uncomfortable perhaps.

    7. Re:had an experience with this by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      However, I knew girls that were going to college in America from India that were great at tennis, and they hired boys to go chase tennis balls for food money. FOR FOOD MONEY. As many as they needed, to practice their swing.

      Ex-programmers, no doubt.

    8. Re:had an experience with this by rsidd · · Score: 1
      Which European country are you referring to?

      The Netherlands. Yes, I believe France has a much better system. On the other hand, the NHS in the UK is seriously stressed out, and I've been seeing news reports for years about patients in the UK (not of Indian origin) flying to India, particularly for eye surgery.

    9. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes. India is a wonderful land of harmony. This "more for me, less for you" thing has been in their culture for so long, so many thousands of years, that they have freaking castes that you are born into. CASTES! The poor are so downtrodden, they have a cultural name, and belief system that doesn't allow them advancement! You are not allowed the benefits of personal merit, you are "low caste" and "high caste." What a crock of shit.

      Yah, in the United States of America, "high caste" and "low caste" are called "white" and "black."

      We hear your ridiculous argument all the time here on Slashdot. How many black software developers have you met in your lifetime? I've spent 25 years in the IT business, and in that entire time I've only ever met 2 black software professionals. Yah, we're the only society in the world that is "equal", so we can criticize other countries, right?

      Remember, whites committed the biggest crime against humanity dragging 115 million Africans across an ocean so that 20 million could survive the journey and become "slaves" for them.

      Go read a book you ignorant white trash cracker.

    10. Re:had an experience with this by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      I heard of people in the US that are sick or injured and go to a doctor and the have to pay money. HAVE TO PAY MONEY.

      I'm glad I live in Canada, I can get an x-ray and not worry about eating for the next week after paying the bill.

      In Canada a homeless person can walk in and get an x-ray. I pity any poor or low income person in the US that needs mendical attention.

      Health care shouldn't be commerce it should be a Human Right.

    11. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What does the caste system have to do with the topic on hand here! I dont talk about the Wilmington riots and slavery in America when I am talking about brain surgery. Bad things happen here just as bad things happen in America or elsewhere in the West. We have an equivalent problem for every Rodney King there. And why are you suddenly so concerned about the poor in Bombay. Dude, they have been there for the last 50 years and more. And you decide to open your eyes to them now that India is actually starting to make some money and may atlast be acually be able to something about them. You are so hollow. Wake up and face it. We are here and we are not going away.

    12. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF?

      Why are people walking in off the street and getting X-rays? You'd think they'd talk to a doctor first or something...

    13. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Europe, you probably mean the UK. France and Belgium's medical track record is pretty much first rate, and get a lot of medical tourism too.

    14. Re:had an experience with this by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Private healthcare is much less expensive in Europe that you seem to think. I've paid for it in both Ireland (VHI, or voluntary health insurance) and Germany, and the costs were far less than the US. Now, that is not to say that the cost is negligable, but it is certainly not "paying through the nose". You really should clarify which European country you are referring to. How would you like it if I made the blanket statement that "healthcare in Asia is awful" when I base that statement on second-hand experience of one country?

    15. Re:had an experience with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True - The PCP's I go to seem less informed than Indian Doctors I have gone to. This is what I feel - The diagnosis is very mechanical - apply some base rules and come to a one size fits all conclusion. I guess its because in India the doctors are more experienced since they have seen many many cases compared to the doctors here
      However I am sure the surgeons in the best schools here are extremely smart -
      This is a personal experience - i am not generalizing.
      Also I have had friends who had dental work messed up here who went to India to get it corrected.
      Usually doctors dont get sued unless they mess up real bad - Its not the in thing yet

  9. ObSimpsons by eap · · Score: 4, Funny

    It didn't work so well for my friend Mr. McGregg, with a leg for an arm, and an arm for a leg.

    1. Re:ObSimpsons by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      It didn't work so well for my friend Mr. McGregg, with a leg for an arm, and an arm for a leg.

      But imagine the circus revenues. Beats programming for $7 per hour.

    2. Re:ObSimpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Jake the Peg, diddle-iddle-iddle-um
      With my extra leg, diddle-iddle-iddle-um
      Wherever I go through rain and snow
      The people always let me know
      There's Jake the peg, diddle-iddle-iddle-um
      With his extra leg, diddle-iddle-iddle /Rolf Harris

  10. what about malpractice? by cabazorro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So you go to Bombay to get a kidney
    removed and they remove the healthy one.
    Can you sue them for malpractice a-la US?
    I'm afraid not.
    I read that some HMO's are sending xrays
    and cat-scans to india for diagnosis via
    internet.

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
    1. Re:what about malpractice? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Typical. You're more worried about who you'd be able to sue than the fact that you'd be left without a healthy kidney.

      Is it any wonder lawyers piss all over everyone in the US when there are people like you who worry more about litigation rights than their own health?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:what about malpractice? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Sure. If your HMO has their principle place of operation in the United States, you can sue them here even if the operation occurred in India.

    3. Re:what about malpractice? by DukeLinux · · Score: 1

      My brother has all his transcription done in India - he is a doctor...and I sent him this link :). He ships the information over at the end of his day and the next morning the transcription arrives via e-mail. I wonder if he uses PGP? I doubt it.

    4. Re:what about malpractice? by JonTurner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>Typical. You're more worried about who you'd be able to sue than the fact that you'd be left without a healthy kidney.

      It's called "thinking ahead," numbskull! Choosing medical care is a cost/benefit/risk assessment. A botched kidney transplant isn't like a bad haircut which corrects itself after a time. Dialysis isn't free (in terms of money and time -- taking approximately half a day, twice a week) and there are substantial medical complications one can expect (including stoke, liver damage, infection, hemmorhage, toxemia, death) from long-term dialysis. If medical negligence causes harm (as per this example), the patient should not have to suffer the financial burden of these injuries as well. Therefore, it's appropriate to look beyond the surgery itself and weigh the risks of a poor outcome -- in the event of negligence, will the patient be able to seek legal recourse?

      But I suppose, in your eyes, it would be more noble for the person to just say "well, that's that... I'll go die now" and quietly go away?

    5. Re:what about malpractice? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      If the original poster had talked about putting things right if things go wrong then perhaps I wouldn't have posted. But seeing as he worded his post to say "Who can I sue?" I responded accordingly.

      Of course medical procedures don't always go perfectly and of course doctors sometimes make mistakes: they are human too, you know. But I'm sure that's an issue that's come up once or twice in the past before, and I'm equally sure that if your health insurer didn't underwrite the cost of restitution if things went wrong then you could take some of the money that you saved by being a medical tourist and use that to buy yourself a nice, big insurance policy to cover you if the worst was to happen.

      Buying insurance would be cheap too. After all, it's not like people are in the habit of taking good organs out and leaving the bad ones behind: people with sort of history don't retain their medical privileges for long.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    6. Re:what about malpractice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The legal recourse and patient health are intimately linked. If you have no ability to complain about bad service, you WILL be stuck with bad service.

    7. Re:what about malpractice? by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      Buying insurance would be cheap? How old are you? Besides, if you had insurance then the insurance company would sue the doctor instead of you. Would that be better? I don't think so, but the insurance company could probably get a better lawyer than you or I could.

      --
      -Rich
    8. Re:what about malpractice? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

      Not familiar with the insurance industry? You can insure yourself against virtually anything. How do you think that sports stars, Hollywood actors and actresses, etc can insure individual body parts?

      Everything can be assigned a risk quotient. And anything that can be so assessed can invariably be insured.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    9. Re:what about malpractice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then dont go to india. what the fuck? is it so tough to choose? u can bring your ailments to india but dont get your lawyers along with them. they are worse than sars.

  11. bad luck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i've heard they can be very painful.

  12. Have they been AIDS tested? by czcxmag · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After spending any time in India (for medical treatment especially), this is a must.

    --
    If you disagree post, don't moderate.
    1. Re:Have they been AIDS tested? by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean "If you were in India for medical treatment, you should get yourself checked for AIDS"? Sorry to disappoint, but you can't get AIDS just by walking around in Bombay or something you know ...

    2. Re:Have they been AIDS tested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant the health care workers in India.

      It's called "conversational implicature".

    3. Re:Have they been AIDS tested? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called 'conversational implicature' when there is a context to assist you with picking out these implications. A lone post, not attached to a parent post, not a parent that's in view anyways, apparently replying to something, without quoting the relevant bits it is replying to, and employing extremely ambiguous language, is in fact severely lacking any 'conversational implicature'. It's just some guy mumbling to himself.

  13. In the West... by gustgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    all parents tell they children that when they'll grow up they'll be doctors. Of course they say that thinking about how a doctor can make and not on how important and honorable (at least it was) to be a doctor.

    Several Med. freshman are not worried about saving lives and helping people, just to get out of the hospital with a Mercedez in the way to their house in the beach. Sometime they say that it is expensive because they had to study for 10 years to be a doctor ... give me a break ... Some people study during all their lifes and don't make the money some surgeons make in a couple of days.

    Some concepts must be reviwed.

    1. Re:In the West... by niko9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not everyone who goes to medical school is in it for the money. Are there misguided fools who only dream of making quick cash? Sure there are, but you'll find that in any field.

      I have been researching a few medical schools as of late, because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.

      I hear there has been a shift in the last 10 to 20 years as far as what medical schools are looking for from applicants. They want people who know exactly why they want to be physicians.

      I know several fellow paramedics who have just been accepted into medical school with average MCAT scores and are over the of 25.

      They understand that these individuals (not just medics, but nurses, EMT's, physican assistants, and people with MBA's who have something to do with medicine) know why they are going to saccrifice their time and effort.

      And there are plenty of doctors that I know that don't make that much money. A few general practitioners who work poor urban areas. They do see some patients for free; the equivalent of pro bono work I guess.

      As far as medicine being expensive in the West, there are alot more factors contributing to the expenses than a physician's salary.

    2. Re:In the West... by Cipster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't think this is a uniquely western problem. I have several Indian and Asian friends and the pressure to become a doctor is even higher there.
      Heck a friend of mine has a PhD and works as a clinical psychologist yet his Indian parents still lament about how he should have become a "Real Doctor".

    3. Re:In the West... by Isldeur · · Score: 1



      As far as medicine being expensive in the West, there are alot more factors contributing to the expenses than a physician's salary.

      Can I second that? I'm an MD and work over 100 hours a week with some of the sickest patients (peds heme/onc) and get about 36 grand. Granted I'm still in residency, but I was thinking yesterday when putting in orders for meds after about 34 hours of trying to stay focused that that's a whole lot of responsiblity to have when you're that tired and that underpaid.

    4. Re:In the West... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Of course they say that thinking about how a doctor can make and not on how important and honorable (at least it was) to be a doctor.

      I don't think that's it, there's also a great deal of prestige that comes with being a doctor. "My son the doctor" sounds better to them than "my son the investment banker", even though the latter might be making a lot more.

    5. Re:In the West... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1, Insightful


      I have been researching a few medical schools as of late, because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.



      Step 1: learn what the apostrope is and how to use it.


      What (or do I mean W'hat?) do you mean by "wan't"? "Wa not?"

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    6. Re:In the West... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      Step 1: Write an apostrophe flame in bad html
      Step 2: don't bother to use preview
      Step 3: ?
      Step 4: make a boring slashdot joke.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    7. Re:In the West... by niko9 · · Score: 1

      Step 1: learn what the apostrope is and how to use it.

      I'm a good speller, but a bad typist. But at least I know how to spell apostrophe
      you pedantic prick.

      Now go get you fucking shine box.

      --

    8. Re:In the West... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      I'm a good speller, but a bad typist. But at least I know how to spell apostrophe [...]

      Ok, so I missed a letter. You say you stuck an apostrophe in "wan't" by mistyping? Just exactly what kind of keyboard are you using?

      Now go get you fucking shine box.

      Huh?
      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    9. Re:In the West... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Blame the AMA. They've been trying to keep the number of doctors down for years to keep salaries up. It's a shame, too, I think most doctors in your situation would prefer to make less money if it meant they could, you know, sleep sometimes.

    10. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Residency is not the same as having your own practice.

      Still, there are many factors unrelated to physician salary contributing to high health care cost in the US. The primary ones are high malpractice insurance and high overhead assocated with insurance/HMOs etc.

      I imagine if there was a way to simplify our system, you would see costs drop considerably. However, this would go against so many existing forces that have nothing to do with medicine per se (AMA, business interests, lawyers) that it is probably an impossibility.

      The US has done this to itself; we really have noone to blame for this state of affairs other than ourselves. India has found a way to simplify our system and offer similar services for lower cost. Too bad most of us won't see that through our xenophobic lenses.

    11. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your grammar continues to suck.

      You say you stuck an apostrophe in "wan't" by mistyping?

      This is not a question but a declarative statement.

      Now, go get your shoe shine box and get back to work.

    12. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.

      Uh. No. Not it's not. The second any "physician" mentions Osteopathic Manipulation Therapy or (glub forbid) Cranial Therapy, that's your cue to be gone.

    13. Re:In the West... by BWJones · · Score: 1

      I have been researching a few medical schools as of late, because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.

      Think carefully about where you want to live if you get a DO. CME (continuing medical education) credits can be more difficult if you live in places where DO schools are not as popular (like the west). CME credits if you have an MD are decidedly easier to obtain. Now, that does not necessarily mean you should not go for the DO as there are some advantages, (but there are disadvantages as well). Some residency programs also (although they will not admit it) prefer an MD versus a DO, although DO's can sometimes get superior training depending upon where they go.

      Our ophthalmology residency training program is fairly hard to get into and we do have a DO in our program here at the Moran Eye Center, but I have not supervised him and cannot comment on his abilities.

      I hear there has been a shift in the last 10 to 20 years as far as what medical schools are looking for from applicants. They want people who know exactly why they want to be physicians.

      Not really. There has been a gradual shift however, in the demographics of a small minority of the applicants with some folks being older when they apply.

      I know several fellow paramedics who have just been accepted into medical school with average MCAT scores and are over the of 25.

      However, don't fool yourself in the many schools weigh the MCAT score quite heavily as they do prove to be a reasonably reliable indicator of performance in your first two years of medical school. (classroom time).

      As far as medicine being expensive in the West, there are alot more factors contributing to the expenses than a physician's salary.

      Now, this you are absolutely correct on. The influence of insurance and HMO's has lead to significant increases in the cost of medicine. But more importantly, (with respect to the cost of medicine) the western consumer of medical services has insisted upon higher quality of medical care which includes expensive new technologies.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    14. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you please explain to me this bullshit practice of forceing residents to work for such ridculously long shifts? I find it simply incomprehensible why you would make a doctor with so much responsibility and who needs to make good decisions do this after having been up for 24 hours.

    15. Re:In the West... by jcomand · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most people going to med school these days are NOT primarily concerning with getting out of the hospital with a Mercedes. I graduated from Harvard college in 1997, and my classmates who DID want a Mercedes went into management consulting and investment banking, and have been making 6 figure salaries for 7 years now. Some of them are millionaires.
      In contrast, your average medical student: lives in a tiny dorm/apartment throughout med school, takes out an average of $95,000 in loans, and when they finally graduate and do a residency, they make only $40,000 per year. (Subtract out loan payments.) When they do their fellowship to become a specialist, they will get paid about the same.
      You are wrong about the timing: it's more than 10 years to become a specialist- at a minimum: 4 college, 4 med school, 3 residency, 3 fellowship= 14 years with negative or small salary.
      And the training is grueling- if prisoners were forced to work as hard as residents, it would be ruled cruel and unusual. You can look at the new work-hour guidelines for residents that are supposed to IMPROVE the situation- 80 hours/week averaged over a month, work an average of 6 days a week, shifts can't be longer than 36 hours straight! Note that many programs are still working residents harder than that!
      Even after finishing training and starting a successful practice, would you want to continue to work 60-70 hours per week, plus be woken up receiving phone calls from patients all night for the rest of your adult life? How about regularly being woken up to go into the hospital in the middle of the night when one of your patients has a heart attack?
      Honestly, most doctors deserve to be paid more than what they are making. There are still a couple of specialties where doctors are RELATIVELY overpaid, but your average doctor deserves at least what he or she is making. There are plenty of valid criticisms of the medical profession, but doctors getting paid too much is not one of them. And to address the original topic, the contribution of doctor's fees to total healthcare expeditures in this country is miniscule. Some of it has do do with liability insurance and the high cost of hospitalizing patients with all of our expensive, modern technology.

    16. Re:In the West... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't think this is a uniquely western problem. I have several Indian and Asian friends and the pressure to become a doctor is even higher there. Heck a friend of mine has a PhD and works as a clinical psychologist yet his Indian parents still lament about how he should have become a "Real Doctor".

      He can just tell his parents to stop being anal retentive and perscribe them a chill-pill.

    17. Re:In the West... by ragnar · · Score: 1

      I think that doctors should make plenty of money. They work hard for the degree, mount expensive school bills, work for at least two years for free during the residency and generally get a late start to earn money. When I go to a doctor I feel better knowing that he isn't stressed about his finances when putting me under the knife or diagnosing my concern.

      While it is true that some people do study hard in other professions and don't make as much money, but most people do still pursue what they love. If the MD makes good money, great. I have no problems being happy for someone else's success.

      --
      -- Solaris Central - http://w
    18. Re:In the West... by grigori · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, they need the $ because they have to pay off the med school $150K debt they have, and then they have to make crap $ while residents at 80 hours a week. When they sign at a hospital they have to pay a fee to be on staff, take night call and run in at 2am, take indigent patients who walk into ER with an aneurysm and get $0 for the work, and then pay $100K per year for malpractice insurance (even if theyve never been sued). And, the HMOs cut their rates for procedures every year. Give me a break yourself - you think it's easy, go get an MD, become board certified and try it yourself. Some people study english lit all their live and never have to hold somebody's blood vessels in their hands...

    19. Re:In the West... by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      In India, every kid grows up expecting to be either a doctor or an engineer. It's almost an honor thing.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    20. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have been researching a few medical schools as of late, because I wan't to get my DO (doctor of osteopathy) which is the same as an MD.

      It most certainly IS NOT.

      And keep researching, because no credible medical school will take you if you have gross spelling mistakes on your application.

    21. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the contrary, the unstated implication is: "Did you say you stuck... ?"

    22. Re:In the West... by orin · · Score: 1

      The amusing thing of course is that historically the Ph.D is the "real" doctor. A few centuries back the medical groups petitioned to be allowed to have the title that was originally reserved for those that had contributed to the sum of human knowledge (Ph.D). They got it - and now, a few hundred years later it is the Ph.D's that are not considered "real" doctors.

    23. Re:In the West... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how are they not equal? What drugs/procedures can an MD do that a comparably trained DO cannot do? The fucking elitism in medicine is disgusting. - a medical student.

  14. Re:State of the art? Come on.. by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    Yeah. Why fly halfway round the globe, if you can have all this (power outages included) in your own country, for twice the price!

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
  15. Three words... by Channard · · Score: 1

    Ice. Bath. Kidneys.

    1. Re:Three words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      urban. fucking. legend.

  16. A few questions... by czcxmag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you needed open heart surgery or a liver transplant, would you still go to India to do it because "it costs less money"?

    Are doctors in India "certified" by the government? do they get inspected regularly for standards of practice?

    I don't want to bash Indian doctors or criticise anyone's decision to valuate medical work purely based on its cost; I just feel the readers should be informed of the potential risks associated with getting major treatments done in other countries just because of financial reasons.

    What if I pick a bad doctor and he messes me up or whatever? Who can I sue? In all likelihood hed be gone after I left.

    --
    If you disagree post, don't moderate.
    1. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The choice should be left to the user and not the government.

      Compulsory certification adds costs to the process and creates a monopoly.

      • While the intentions are/were definitely laudable, in US the numbers of doctors and their salaries are kept artificially low by the medical association.
      • Requiring a doctor's prescription for medicine, adds so much more cost for even routine ailments. I know when I have throat infection and I also know what antibiotic to take for it. Instead of buying the medicine directly from the pharmacy I have to spend money to get prescription from a doctor.
      • Health Insurance. Health insurance for routine visits just does not make sense. If doctors gave a break for people paying cash it would lower their cost and my cost. Health insurance should be kept only for catastrophic events.
      • Less regulation on routine drugs.
      • I would not mind a reduced ability to sue if it reduced my costs.
      It is certainly easy to talk about good things that regulation brings you while enjoying health coverage. For people with no or marginal health coverage it is a matter of survival. As a self employed professional I pay a very high health insurance premium. My family does not go for dental exams anymore becase I do not have health coverage.

      I certainly would not mind lower health insurance premiums. It is tough making ends meet.

      My friends who are physicians make a whole lot more. I doubt that they put in more work or have more training than I have.

      Dictionary Definitions

    2. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cf. "Minority Report"

    3. Re:A few questions... by r.muk · · Score: 5, Informative

      "What if I pick a bad doctor and he messes me up"

      In general the average India surgeon operates on many more patients than the US surgeon. It's simple, there are just that many more people in India, and far fewer surgeons. So the level of experience for common procedures is higher in India than in the US. If a medical procedure calls for a cyclotron and a super-computer - the Western countries are where THAT can be done. But a heart bypass - it's done routinely and successfully all the time.

      I live in India. My daughter's life has once been saved by the India public (read free) health system. So I'm prejudiced in its favour.

      Of course you can get excellent (if expensive) medical / surgical treatment in the US.

      And of course some India doctors are venal and money-focussed.

      But don't dismiss India doctors and India hospitals as a whole. On the whole they are very very good. And they are about as likely to skip legal consequences (if any) as a US doctor or hospital. Note - the judicial system in India does NOT have jury trials. So no little old ladies get awarded a hundred million when their nose jobs go awry. But there is adequate enforcement of accountability in medical practice.

      . . .

    4. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can offer some insight as one of my sisters is a doctor and practices in india.

      Yes a doctor can lose his license if he is sued for malpractice. And the service that a doctor provides to a consumer can be debated in 'consumer courts'. I have personally heard of doctors going bankrupt in bombay for having to pay penalty for an operation that went bad. About the insurance - I don't know if that would work well. Since the fines to ba paid to a US base dpatient will be so much higher than an indian patient to compensate for the lifestyle, I doubt the doctors and their insurance companies will be willing to pay this. However, if they tie up with HMOs and have these agencies share the insurance premium this might actually work.

    5. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The worst thing that can happen is that you die. the hospital board circles the wagons and refuse to share any information regarding what went wrong, and trust me something went wrong.
      Now this can happen at any hospital located anywhere in the world and while the money from a lawsuit is never worth the price, stripping the doctors of all their material possecions and throwing them and their families to the street would give me some saisfaction, unfortunately the legal system here in India is a little odd. the odds of the truth ever coming out are minimal.
      guess im venting here, forgive me, lost a close relative recently, what makes it worse was that it was supposed to be an innocuos procedure that got bungled by negligence.

    6. Re:A few questions... by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      Who can I sue? In all likelihood hed be gone after I left
      No, people cannot just disappear in India.

      Are doctors in India "certified" by the government? do they get inspected regularly for standards of practice?
      You do not just go to the nearest hospital you find - there are good places and there are bad places - for such a large population, there is to be expected. If I go back to India now, I'll know where to go - there are places that have doctors who are so amazing they are almost considered gods! If you have a heart problem, the place to go is the Christian Medical College, Vellore. If you can get operated by Dr. Cherian, you must be the luckiest person in the world.
      I went home on vacation in January and that's when I discovered that I had a problem with a wisdom tooth growing in the wrong direction. So off I went to a clinic near my place. I've not ben to a dentist in the US, so I'll leave it to someone here with the experience to tell me how much a tooth removal would cost here in the US. At the clinic, I got an immediate appointment, and the lady removed my tooth completely painlessly and half an hour later, I was home. How much did it cost? Rs. 100 (that's $2!). I also got prescribed a course of antibiotics and painkillers to be used in an emergency. Total cost of medicines - around $2.

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    7. Re:A few questions... by dmr001 · · Score: 1

      So, if I understand you correctly, you claim:

      * We'd be better off if physicians weren't certified, and patients would do their own research as to the qualifications of their practitioner.

      * When you have a throat infection, you can somehow tell without access to a medical lab whether or not you have viral pharyngitis, a Group A strep infection, some other bacterial infection, or a developing peritonsillar abscess.

      * People who are poor enough to have to choose between rent and food and have enough chronic illnesses that they see a physician every month should not have health insurance available to them for "routine" visits

      Do you really want to shop around for the right emergency department? Do you really want anyone graduating from Brand X medical school to hang out a shingle and never take board certification exams? (These days, most primary care physicians take certifying exams every 6-10 years.)

      As a physician, I have enough trouble when people take leftover antibiotics, guessing at the frequency and duration of treatment, and making subsequent bacterial culture testing impossible. When I've practiced overseas, I've seen children die when their kids mistakenly get dosed with the wrong amount of "routine" anti-malarial medicine.

    8. Re:A few questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in Mumbai a few months and stayed close to a new hospital that was being built for 'medical tourism' in Andheri, a suburb. In addition to having facilities and equipmet on par with the best hospitals in the world, they're going to have apartments for families, a helipad for transfers to/from the airport, and doctors moving back from the US/UK to work there. In spite of all this, the costs are still going be lesser. The point is, if you are going to go to India to get medical treatment, you are going to go a facility designed with the western patient in mind. The best hospitals there already are world-class, both infrastructure and doctor-wise.

      The operative word here is tourism. Somebody making these kinds of investments is going to ensure that customers are happy to make a profit; and this will have to include strict adherence to international standards - equipment, doctor/nurse quality, patient confidentiality etc.

    9. Re:A few questions... by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but you miss the very concept of reservation.

      Indian schools have a category for people who have been supposedly been deprived of the facilities owing to their caste in the past. Hence there is the concept of reservation -- one where you are admitted if you belong to a supposedly lower caste merely because in the past your ancestors were discriminated against.

      These are called Scheduled Castes & Tribes and other backward communities.

      Now, tonnes of people in medical schools have far less than what it takes to legitimately get into medical school, and pass out of one. So, if you belong to whats construed as a "backward community", you are allowed to slack off, and thats a trump card that many use to get through school even though they do not deserve to be there.

      Tell me honestly, would you really like someone with inferior skills who passed out owing to his race of birth was allowed to pass out to work on you? I would not.

      And yeah, all the rich and the famous in India including the politicians themselves do not trust Indian medicos -- they goto US or UK (or Europe) for treatment. That in itself would say a lot.

      Not in my life would I trust my life with an Indian doctor. No sir.

  17. Re:State of the art? Come on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Power outages are normal.

    Daily power outages, however, are not.

    If you're looking for cheap healthcare, to go Mexico. At least their power grid is stable, and your life won't be at the mercy of Prakesh the bicycle errand boy who fetches gasoline for the generators.

    It just surprises me how many people in this country go with HMOs.. I'll stop short of calling them idiots, but....well, no. I take that back. They are idiots.

  18. There isn't much that can't be outsourced by alien_blueprint · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just yesterday a friend of mine with an degree in economics was talking about the push in that field to move much of the work offshore.

    This applies to any profession - there is no "safe" field. Look at law - despite what television tells you, most people with law degrees aren't engaging in clever courtroom rhetoric all day, or even at all, but doing "back office" stuff. This, too, can be offshored in time.

    I'm not saying that this is a good or a bad thing, or that I have any answers, but it *is* obvious that saying "just get a new career in accounting/law/marketing/whatever!" is naive because there is no strictly "safe" field to start with, and never will be.

    1. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm not saying that this is a good or a bad thing"

      Please. I'll say it for you - this is a very bad thing. I saw an economist on Lou Dobb's Friday program saying that with all the Tech and Services jobs going overseas, "...if our future isn't in Tech and Services, I don't know what it is in".

      Agreed.

      If these trade agreements aren't revisited and revisited damn soon, it IS going to plunge the company into a serious recession or depression. We're shipping an ungodly amount of our jobs, wealth, and future everywhere else but the USA.

      I'm sure it's easy for all of these other countries to have grossly better wages when they are: barely developed, have no labor laws, no environmental laws, etc.

      Kerry for President! Bush isn't doing a damn thing about it and his chief economic adviser things offshoring is a wonderful thing!

    2. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pump gasoline, or run a hotel--

      service industry is pretty safe..
      hard to export
      "service" jobs- and they don't all suck.

    3. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      Who says you can't run a hotel from India? Let's be real. ...and our future is pumping gasoline? I think most people pump it themselves actually.

      This. Is. Sad.

    4. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Actually, that isn't true. One point of last value with the U.S. is the it *is* going to be an immensely large market that the rest of the world will want to sell to. Any job that is client and customer facing (in the literal sense of "facing", mind you!) will be un-outsourceable.


      If you're a techie and worried about what outsourcing may do to your career consider technical marketing or becoming a sales engineer. Good sales people make several hundred thousand dollars a year selling technology, and that role is not going to get outsourced (even if the product is). I would have to believe that the sometimes-low craft of selling is quite learnable and an engineer turned sales engineer turned sales guy will be a more credible voice for the technology as a technically weak smooth sales guy would be. My 0.02 etc. peace!

    5. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by wiggles · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you honestly think that Kerry will be able to do anything about this? You're talking about fighting economic forces here. The only way to prevent this current outsourcing trend is to become totally isolationist, which two world wars tell us is totally wrong. Either that or go back in time and undo the Clintonian H1B trend of the last ten years (where do you think the Indian labor force learned how to do their jobs) and stop importing students for American universities.

      Do the words "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss" mean anything to you?

      No, America's true skill is not in tech or medicine, but in creativity. Just wait. You'll see a new revolution in something, maybe nanotech, maybe biotech (here's hoping we can get cloning regulated, not banned), maybe something completely different, that will propel us into the future. In the mean time, we're rich enough. Let the rest of the world have some for a change. Hell, our unemployment rate currently is less than the average unemployment rate of the 1990's. We're doing OK. I'm just as bitter about not being able to skim inflated wages anymore as you are, but soon, we'll start to at least make something fair. It'll just take some time. No matter who gets elected President.

    6. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Do you honestly think that Kerry will be able to do anything about this?"

      Yes.

      "You're talking about fighting economic forces here. The only way to prevent this current outsourcing trend is to become totally isolationist, which two world wars tell us is totally wrong."

      Who said anything about being isolationist? I'm FOR trade. It's a wonderful thing. The problem with NAFTA and the WTO is that we gave away the farm. We didn't insist that other countries rise to our level (i.e., with labor standards, environmental standards, etc.) and as a result, we're grossly mismatched. You can't expect any part of our economy to compete with another country that doesn't have similar regulation. Just not going to happen.

      Kerry, or someone, needs to revisit the trade agreements until they are **fair**.

      "No, America's true skill is not in tech or medicine, but in creativity. Just wait. You'll see a new revolution in something, maybe nanotech, maybe biotech (here's hoping we can get cloning regulated, not banned), maybe something completely different, that will propel us into the future."

      Wow! The logic here just escapes me. We can offshore tech, legal jobs, radiology, but it's not going to be possible to offshort "...nanotech, maybe biotech"??? You're kidding yourself.

      "In the mean time, we're rich enough. Let the rest of the world have some for a change".

      The issue isn't "some", it's going to be "most". What part of the economy can we be competitive in with the current trade agreements. We have a 500 ***billion*** trade deficit right now!!!!!!

      "Hell, our unemployment rate currently is less than the average unemployment rate of the 1990's. We're doing OK."

      We are? The unemployment figures do not take into account workers who are discouraged and stopped looking. It takes 150,000 new jobs each month just to keep up with population growth. We've *yet* to have one month over 150,000 in the last 3 years.

      "I'm just as bitter about not being able to skim inflated wages anymore as you are, but soon, we'll start to at least make something fair. It'll just take some time. No matter who gets elected President."

      Rotsa luck dude. This isn't about a high paying job, it's about a future period.
      - We have yet to have one month in 3 years with over 150,000 new jobs just to keep up with population growth.
      - We have a 500 billion dollar trade deficit. 500 billion dollars!
      - Lou Dobb's program on Friday night showed a graph indicating that in Tech trade, we used to have a 30 billion dollar surplus. Now we have a 30 billion dollar deficit.

    7. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by BACPro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I repair *physical* things each day as do the 29 other (wo)men that I work with each day.

      You can't really ship a fridge or air conditioner to India, fix it, and ship it back.

    8. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 1

      Ummm, please tell me where Kerry even lays out a plan for the economy? Much less for the issue of outsourcing?

      So far his campaign is soley built on "I can beat Bush". There's barely been any mention of the issues except to bash Bush. No plans, no ideas.

      Just because someone opposes Bush doesn't mean they think differently on all (any) of the issues.

    9. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure what to tell you. You're not paying attention. He screams about offshoring *daily* and says the trade agreements need to be revisited.

    10. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by jbplou · · Score: 1

      While I am not happy with jobs being offshored, I can tell you there are some jobs that will never go offshore, because it is impossible. For example if I need a well drilled because my well went dry somebody in Asia isn't going to be able to do that for me. I don't think somebody in India is going to be my real estate agent from thousands of miles away. Knowledge jobs and manufactoring can be put anywhere, but many service and meet and greet jobs can not go overseas. Unless you

    11. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by phatsharpie · · Score: 1

      >The only way to prevent this current outsourcing trend is to
      >become totally isolationist, which two world wars tell us is
      >totally wrong.

      Protectionism is not isolationism. The US is already protectionist. We place trade barriers on many different things - especially agricultural products.

      >Either that or go back in time and undo the Clintonian H1B
      >trend of the last ten years (where do you think the Indian labor
      >force learned how to do their jobs) and stop importing
      >students for American universities.

      The H1B cap was raised only in 1999, at the end of the Clinton administration. If Bush or the Republican congress actually cared about the H1B visa issue, they had four years to enact changes, unfortunately they did nothing from 2000 to October of last year (2003). In fact the cap only dropped because an expiration date was written into the law raising the H1B visa cap.

      Also, I don't understand this fear of foreign students. The truth to the matter is that most of domestic students' education is actually subsidized by the much higher tuitions paid by foreign students. The government has been cutting funding to public universities for years, and foreign students are a great source of additional funding. Furthermore, the students who do get into American universities tend to be quite talented and gifted, and many of them do end up staying in the US after graduation - becoming a valuable part of the workforce.

      Your comment on not "importing" additional foreign students is especially odd when you have already made a comment about how the US shouldn't be isolationistic.

      -B

    12. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by The+Desert+Palooka · · Score: 2, Informative

      OK, there it is... I found it. He mentions something about ending special tax cuts for companies that outsource...

      but then again he also mentions about Bush providing too little in the form of homeland security, which is funny since I distinctly recall him screaming about how Bush is trying to make this all about homeland security and we need to not focus on that... Terrorism and security aren't the issue

      Uh, but your own material says it is.

      I can understand why he'd want it not to be the issue too. While he's carting around his "band of brothers" he was highly involved with war protests with the Vietnam Vets Against War and Jane Fonda. Many POW/MIA families are pissed at him for his time as the POW/MIA Chairman of the commitee on POW/MIA affairs. His behavior seemed to be more about normalization and less about saving any remaining POWs/MIAs. At the end of his term he simply declared that there were none left alive but didn't list nor look into how they died, who they were, where their remains are.

      My point in all of this is, if one misrepresents (read: lies) so freely on one thing (esp something he makes such a big deal about), he'll likely lie on others, and deserves some closer looks.

      But at least Kerry seems to read one part of his BS. OF COURSE Kerry screams about it daily. After that econimist's banter about outsourcing "in the long run *probably* being a good thing" with the Media and Dem leaders getting pissed and covering it. I don't think Kerry can do a thing to stop outsourcing, even with stopping the tax breaks.

      The funny thing: Clinton's Labor Sec (Robert Reich) said the same aprox the same thing if not worse: "Outsourcing does not reduce the total number of jobs in America," ... "If other countries can do something cheaper we ought to let them do it, and concentrate on what we can do best."

      Oh I forgot, this is slashdot, we love Clinton.

    13. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Problem with that approach is that an entirely sales-based economy is not sustainable. Where do people obtain the money to buy these products you're selling? Selling other things? To whom? At some point, value must be created, and that crucial process is what is being outsourced. Salesmanship is just the process, now, of draining what remaining fiscal reserves we have left. When those are gone, who are you going to sell to?

    14. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example if I need a well drilled...

      See the "Mars rover fixes dishwashers" message.

    15. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're shipping an ungodly amount of our jobs, wealth, and future everywhere else but the USA.

      Reminds of something a famous person once said: "Most of our imports come from overseas"

    16. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Rocinante · · Score: 1

      You can't really ship a fridge or air conditioner to India, fix it, and ship it back.

      You can, however, make stuff cheaply enough that it's a better idea to just throw away the broken piece and buy a new one.

      --
      Just trying to open someone's head! I mean "mind!" Open someone's mind, um, to the possibilities! With explosives!
    17. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      What part of the economy can we be competitive in with the current trade agreements. We have a 500 ***billion*** trade deficit right now!!!!!!

      Dude, please understand what trade deficit means before you go picking on trade agreements. (Not that I am a fan of the current ones). America's Maligned and Misunderstood Trade Deficit.

      The problem with NAFTA and the WTO is that we gave away the farm. We didn't insist that other countries rise to our level (i.e., with labor standards, environmental standards, etc.) and as a result, we're grossly mismatched. You can't expect any part of our economy to compete with another country that doesn't have similar regulation. Just not going to happen.

      As a matter of principle you did insist on a rise in environmental standards with NAFTA. Hence the formation of the Commission for Environmental Cooperation.

      However in reality, NAFTA has worked as a tool for lowering of environmental standards, in all countries involved, due to the way it allows big business to sue governments for protecting the environment & health of its citizens. See: Billion Dollar NAFTA Challenge To California MTBE Ban, Canada's First Province-Wide Ban of Cosmetic Pesticides Threatened Under NAFTA, and Metalclad vs. Mexico: The Toxicity of NAFTA's Ruling.

      On the other hand, sometimes governments do steal property from businesses, or intimidate them, and it's not necessarily a good thing. Cronyism and corrupt officials exist everywhere, at all levels (not just the rich), so NAFTA's mechanisms are not entirely without merit.

      The danger to workers in the USA isn't unfair trade relationships with other countries. It's inappropriate relationships with wealth and power in your own country. Next time you notice a huge trade or budget deficit, at any level, ask yourself this: if every government in the world is in debt at the same time (and that is possible), who do they owe it to? What does that mean in terms of power and influence? And is that good for workers?

    18. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by pben · · Score: 1

      Accounting going off shore? Great the next Enron or Worldcom can get their books faked at a lower cost! More money to the bottom line!

      I am sure that the SEC will out source their enforcement when it collapses.

    19. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Psyrg · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I'm wrong, but dont economic situations such as this have a way of settling themselves? I am not an economist, but wont the value of the US dollar decrease such that outsourcing and importing are less profitable, and exports are more?

      This will require the US to produce more of its own food and oil however, because of the cost of the increase in the price of imported goods.

    20. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by ashayh · · Score: 1

      and stop importing students for American universities.
      I suggest you pick up any text book on computer science thats used in college. Then look at the citations and count the number of papers from people of Asian origin that you see.
      I cant say about the chinese and others, but I garuntee you the percent number of Indians that you'll find will be larger than the ONE percent of US population that they constitute.
      Search for any topic on citeseer ... tell me how many Asians/Indians you see.
      Of course Americas true skill is creativity... however as far as the computer industry is concerned, you forget that creative work done by asians has a disproportionately larger share than their populations. Its a fact.

    21. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell me there's still Americans who believe Vietnam still has US POWs...

    22. Re:There isn't much that can't be outsourced by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      "The unemployment figures do not take into account workers who are discouraged and stopped looking."

      People don't get discouraged and stop looking for a job unless they are independently wealthy; people have to eat. The US government says a person is discouraged and has stopped looking when their unemployment benefits run out and they still don't have a job. US citizens are not counted as unemployed after their unemployment benefits run out (which is something like 9 months, IIRC).

      --
      -Rich
  19. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While, as an Indian, I am flattered by your opinion, your argument is flawed. I think that the Indians you've met are good at the math and sciences because their parents pushed their children to become engineers.

    Furthermore, almost every culture that has existed for thousands of years has had a few great scientists. Are the British inherently any smarter because Issac Newton was British, or the French any wiser because Pascal was French? Obviously not!

  20. Facet? by gregh76 · · Score: 1

    More like a bane.

  21. Time to switch professions. by HoxBox · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am a medical student. I still got a few years to decide but looks like surgery is not the way, maybe now I should become an ER doctor. I would be very surprised if they are outsourced in the near future.

    1. Re:Time to switch professions. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      No, your in the right field I think. There will be a lot of retired baby-boomers that will need a lot of treatment over the course of their lives.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Time to switch professions. by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Yup - thats what concorde has been doing all this time. Ferrying people from car crashes to India in only 5 hours!

  22. So this is the world in 10 years' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    90% of the physical products you buy will be built in China, and possibly designed there too.

    90% of the services you use will be provided by India.

    It's ironic that the West leads in one main field, namely agriculture, which should have been outsourced a long time ago were it not for the farming lobbies.

    There is no moral to this story except that everything you use and buy - except food - will get cheaper and cheaper.

    1. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add that you'll be making much much less than what you used to so those cheaper and cheaper prices will actually be priced out of your budjet.

    2. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      "There is no moral to this story except that everything you use and buy - except food - will get cheaper and cheaper."

      I agree with your percentages and that's the conclusion you draw from all of that? Wouldn't the primary point be that if 90% of the physical products come from China and 90% of the services comes from India,,, uhhhhh,,, what is everyone doing for employment in the USA??????????????

      It doesn't matter how cheap goods and services are, if you're out of work, you can't afford anything.

    3. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is no moral to this story except that everything you use and buy - except food - will get cheaper and cheaper.

      Actually, the moral seems to be government subsidies work.

    4. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what is everyone doing for employment in the USA?"

      Owning stock in companies that do this. :)

      I have it figured.

    5. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by Tremanhil · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, household, industrial, and commercial robots will have put the other 10% out of work.

    6. Re:So this is the world in 10 years' time... by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      Ok, this is just an interesting observation - not supposed to be disparaging to anyone.
      Just reflecting on the thought that West (according to the parent post) will lead in agriculture while the East will be the technology hub. Isn't that a complete role reversal?

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  23. One step ahead of them! by graveyardduckx · · Score: 2, Funny

    The staff at my family doctor's office has already been replaced by immigrants from India! I guess that saves me a lot of money on a plane ticket! Wait a minute...

    1. Re:One step ahead of them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The staff at my family doctor's office has already been replaced by immigrants from India!

      So who do you think you are? .... a native American?

  24. Re:Get with the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In India, its always BEEN Mumbai.. just the west that called it Bombay!

  25. India by Beardydog · · Score: 1

    Is India now a geek-news subject just because of outsourcing?

    1. Re:India by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Remember when Japan was an economic powerhouse, they were going to buy us all out, and we were all turning Japanese? Endless stories about that until a minor currency hiccup changed things. These things come and go, and while there's truth in the stories, keep an eye on who benefits from the wide coverage of them:

      Indian companies trying to sell services to the west? A bit.
      Western companies who would like to keep labour costs down by creating FUD and panic about outsourcing without actually outsourcing? A lot.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  26. Overpaid doctors by otter42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I personally welcome this. Maybe it's because of the bad taste left in my mouth by seeing the local orthodontist brag about how he only worked a couple hours a week, right before he jumped into his multi-million dollar Mitsubishi turbo-prop. My mom just paid several thousand dollars to have a root canal/tooth cap.

    Perhaps it's not the best bet for open heart, but for some of the more insanely priced operations like that I think it make senses.

    --
    www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    1. Re:Overpaid doctors by wheresdrew · · Score: 3, Funny
      Maybe it's because of the bad taste left in my mouth by seeing the local orthodontist

      If you had a bad taste in your mouth after seeing the orthodontist, it makes me wonder what else went on besides dentistry while you were under the anesthesia.

    2. Re:Overpaid doctors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like he's taking it up the other end.

    3. Re:Overpaid doctors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally welcome this.

      "Well I for one welcome our new cheap-labor overlords."

    4. Re:Overpaid doctors by weiyuent · · Score: 1

      I personally welcome this. Maybe it's because of the bad taste left in my mouth by seeing the local orthodontist brag about how he only worked a couple hours a week, right before he jumped into his multi-million dollar Mitsubishi turbo-prop.

      I'd hazard a guess though that offshore medecine will have little effect on any care that requires regular local visits, such as orthodontics. The cost of travel would just be prohibitive.

    5. Re:Overpaid doctors by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Have you ever looked at a hospital bill? The most outrageous expenses are for the hospital. When my wife had a biopsy, the doctors got a few hundred dollars, while the hospital charged around $1000. She was only there for two hours!

    6. Re:Overpaid doctors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In India root canal/tooth cap cost mere maximum 100USD.

  27. The article speaks for itself.... by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the article...

    Contrary to the claims of the council, Dr Baru believes there will be no trickle down of money to the impoverished public health system, which currently receives just 0.9% of India's gross domestic product. The MTC's plans may well benefit the doctors and patients involved, but it is currently unclear how a country that still suffers from malaria and TB will reap the rewards of a new wave of medical tourists coming to India.

    India has a long way to go before Americans are going to accept their HMO's forcing them there.

    --
    What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    1. Re:The article speaks for itself.... by TomV · · Score: 1

      It's hardly surprising that millions of our fellow human beings continue to die from malaria, when the pharmaceutical companies are more interested in developing hugely profitable treatments for the ill-effects of over-consumption and lack of exercise by the rich.

  28. No way... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There is no way in hell that any HMO or insurance company should ever be allowed to tell a patient "we're gonna fly you half way around the world for this surgery". The HMO's are horrible as it is. They get doctors in their network and supply a doctors practice with nearly all his patients. Then they tell the doctor if any surgery, or very expensive treatment has to be performed, they must first call the HMO for approval first. Guess who makes the approval? Not a doctor at the HMO but a buisness manager. They even have incentives at HMO's to provide bonuses for those buisness managers that keep costs the lowest, and they fire the ones who spends more. If the doctor prescribes the treatment anyways, they can get dropped from the HMO and lose all the patients the insurance company provided.

    Laws need to be passed to protect the people. These insurance companies are evil. We would be better off with a state run health insurance system than the hyena's that currently run the insurance companies.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:No way... by martinX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They won't tell you thay you have to to go, they'll offer you a choice. Something like : "Go on a long waiting list (read: permanent waiting list) for a cheap doctor in the US, or have it done now in India." That way, the choice is yours.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    2. Re:No way... by Cipster · · Score: 1

      In a way I would welcome this. It may just provide enough of a public outcry that it will prompt real health system reform.

    3. Re:No way... by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      People complain that the government is evil and only caters to the rich. And you want the government to run healthcare? If that's the case, people with government connections will be first in line to get heathcare.

      John Doe: I need to be put on a list for kidney transplant.
      Government worker: Have you made any political contributions to our president/governer/mayor?
      John Doe: No
      Government worker: It looks like we'll be able to find you a kidney in 326 years. Now just fill out 20 different forms with unfriendly instructions.

      I'm not saying that the insurance companies are champions of good, but the answer isn't simple as "just let the government take care of it".

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    4. Re:No way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what you do resources for healthcare are finite, so someone has to set a budget. However the usual fix is that the government pays for healthcare, and the MDs agree to this (and the lower average earnings they can expect as a result) on the condition that health care policy and individual patient decisions are made by health care workers, not government appointees.

      Since the government's objective is to have healthy citizens, this works out more or less fine. The HMO doesn't want healthy citizens, it wants money so there's always going to be a conflict there.

  29. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Shisha · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The only issue I have with India as a "doctors" country is the poor record they have on transplants. I've read (sorry don't remember the source, try google), that many poor Indians are willing to sell their (or even their children's) kidney's just to get some cash. And the article went on about how some of the poor and unimportant people that no-one would miss are used as cheap and reliable sources of hearts and liver for transplants.

    So yes, joint operations are fine, I'd be vary of the ethical consequences of getting a cheap transplant in India.

    On the other hand if any of you lot have lost jobs due to outsourcing, what a great way to get even, "Kill Bill style".

    Also relate is the article in last week's Sunday Times (English ones) about English people going to Budapest to have their teeth fixed for a fraction of the cost.

  30. Outsourced radiology is a reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine worked on a project for one of the local hospitals here that helped to move: most of billing, most of radiology, almost all of the folks that read the MRI's -- to India. The hospital still charges you the same amount, they still bill your insurance an amount 1/20 of what you would pay if you paid cash. The only thing that changed is a mess of radiology workers are out of work here & some of the accountants took a forced early retirement.

    You still have people physically running the machines, but the people who interpet them are over there.

    I wonder what they will do if they get DDOSed?

  31. Better solution by bigattichouse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is more a problem of OUR system, than anything better about theirs. I've got a cheaper solution: Build a Cruise-Ship/Hospital and park it 4+ miles offshore, offer first class medical help without all the US bullshit... you could cruise up and down the shore and hit more locations.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey that was my Idea! Also, it would be nice to have one Indian against an American. Just so we can find out if they are better or worse. But then we are already hiring India-trained doctors in the US. Why can't our doctors face the reality that there are doctors around the world that can do the same job they can just as well if not better and for a whole lot less?

      On another point, did you know that many cruise ship jobs are also 'off-shored' to Indians? No pun intended.

    2. Re:Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot - ships have a tendancy to roll with the waves. Just what you want when they're cutting that tumour out of your brain

    3. Re:Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it you've never been on a big boat in coastal waters. 99% of the time you won't even know.

    4. Re:Better solution by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      Ok.. then build a oil derek/platform... or just buy some nice carribean island and make a medical resort... I'm sure it would be nice to recover from surgery in a nice climate.

      --
      meh
    5. Re:Better solution by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

      The problem comes from the high costs of insurance and other things thanks to the sue-happy world we live in. Add this to the wonderful world of pharmaceutical lobbyists, and you can't afford medical assitance... I don't argue that there are probably many more good doctors in India, its an economy of scale... look at the pool of individuals they have to draw from, you eventually get a large number of extremely talented folks. Unfortunately, you also get a large number of people living in squalor within a minutes walk from the successful. Either way, this *should not* prevent the U.S. from fixing its method of doing business.

      --
      meh
    6. Re:Better solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A group of Dutch (I think) doctors run a ship providing abortion services to Polish women. Docks in port, takes women outside coastal zone, procedure is taken out of Polish law. Note that under communism abortion was legal.

      Poor Poles. They got rid of Communism and got Catholicism...

  32. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I think that the Indians you've met are good at the math and sciences because their parents pushed their children to become engineers.

    You're partially wrong. The other part of the reason is that Indian primary schools are real schools, not the socialized babysitting locations America has. If you measure a child from America who's been homeschooled (or was lucky enough to go to a _real_ school) against an Indian child who went to random primary school X, they'd probably be about the same.

    The real irony of all this is that costs us (Americans) more to have the socialized babysitting centers than it would to have real schools.

    Of course, when you see an Indian student at a University studying to be an engineer, it's no mistake that he's there. Smart people get to go to college*. You never meet the stupid ones.

    [*] Rich people get to go to college too, but they go into business school.

  33. Re:State of the art? Come on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be stupid. While there are bad, bad slums in India, there are also neighbourhoods which look like a middle class area in the US. Power outages are not that common either.

  34. Cost of Cardiosurgery by xmpcray · · Score: 5, Informative

    My mother went through angioplasty at the Escorts Heart Research Institute (New Delhi, India, http://www.ehirc.com/). Not only did the operation go smoothly, the total cost of the whole procedure (including stay, doctor's fee, consultations, actual procedure, angiography etc) came to under $4000. Out of this $2000 was for the medicated stent used, which is imported from the US.

    (PS: This particular hospital performs over 20 angioplasties and around 8 bypass surgeries daily)

    --

    --
    I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
    1. Re:Cost of Cardiosurgery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My father recently went through the same procedure in Florida. I think he said it came to over $80,000.

    2. Re:Cost of Cardiosurgery by xmpcray · · Score: 1

      Wow! thats a lot of money. It sure would make sense to come to India, get operated and go back. As long as other things are in order...(trust, condition of patient to travel, arrangement etc)

      --

      --
      I refuse to answer that question on the grounds that I don't know the answer.
  35. I ain't showing up in Bombay by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do I need to point out Bombay is called Mumbai? Sort of a Instanbul/Constantinople thing.

    See this page for information.

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Constantinople" was like 600 years ago. Try to send a letter to NY by addressing it to "New Amsterdam" and see if it goes there or not !

    2. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by azaris · · Score: 1

      "Constantinople" was like 600 years ago.

      Maybe a better comparison would have been Leningrad or Saigon. And I think many people still call it Bombay, even inside India.

    3. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, the capital of the West Roman Empire fell in 1453, but the Ottoman Turks were quite happy to call the city Constantinople. It wasn't until after WWI, when Ataturk started westernizing what remained of Turkey, that they renamed the city Istanbul. They also moved the capital to Ankara. I think the reason for starting a new capital would have been to make a fresh start without the historical weight of centuries of Ottoman traditions.

    4. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I was referring to an obscure cultural reference.

      Istanbul (Not Constantinople) is a song by They Might be Giants which debates where you are gonna show up for your date if it was supposed to be in Constantinople.

      I didn't realize I was that obscure.

      --
      D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    5. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by dacarr · · Score: 1
      Istanbul was actually a remake that TMBG did of these guys song of the same name - which my wife recalls hearing performed on Captain Kangaroo.

      Both versions have their merits and are both worth the listen.

      --
      This sig no verb.
    6. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surprise! We've all heard the song--you can stop patting yourself on the back now.

    7. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do I need to point out Bombay is called Mumbai? Sort of a Instanbul/Constantinople thing.

      No true blue Bombayite will ever call the city Mumbai or call himself a Mumbaikar.

      Bombay is Bombay in English, Bambai in Hindi (national language) & Mumbai in Marathi (state language of Maharashtra where Bombay exists).

      10 years back, Bombay used to be referred to Mumbai, Bombay or Bambai depending on which language you were conversing in.

      Then the politicians changed the official name to
      Mumbai in all languages - it was nothing but a political stunt - yes all newspapers & articles will now always call it Mumbai, but a true blue Bombayite will never call it Mumbai when speaking in English or Hindi.

      As a matter of fact, as a rebellion thing, he will call it Bombay in all languages now.

    8. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we do. I was born in Bombay, not Mumbai.
      My passport (issued after the government "changed" the
      name) still says Bombay, because that's what I wrote on the form, and no one
      objected.
      The problem is a multilingual society and a bad transliteration system.
      In any language there is an "accepted" version of a name. Thus "Warsaw" in English, "Warszawa" (pronounced something like Varshava) in Polish, "Varsovie" in French.
      Bombay has three versions: Bombay in English, "Bambai" (pron. something like bum-bye) in Hindi, and "mumbai" (pron. something like moom-bye) in Marathi.
      The problem is the Marathis are the people in whose territory Bombay happens to be situated, but the city itself was largely built and financed by non-Marathis under the security provided by British rule at a time when surrounding areas were breaking down under lawlessness and banditry (hence decline of Surat, formerly the great trading port of the area before the Mughal empire declined).
      India being in the middle of a very long process of switching over to English from the vernaculars, the Marathis aren't satisfied with pointing out that they call the city "Mumbai" when speaking Marathi - they have to shove it down the throat of the English speakers because they know the English name is in the long run the only one that matters.
      The same sort of thing worked with the Bengalis and Calcutta (English) / Kalkatta (pron like Cull-cutta) (Hindi) and Kolkata (Bengali) - and I don't know any Tamil, but I imagine the same process of insertion-into-the-prestige language happened in Tamil. Ironically Delhi is the only city that wasn't created by the British, and the only one that hasn't tried to "change" its name "back" to either the Hindi/Urdu version "Dilli".

    9. Re:I ain't showing up in Bombay by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Do I need to point out Bombay is called Mumbai?

      But if the writeup said "Mumbai" then there'd be no opportunity for a bunch of slashdotters to make Bewitched-referencing Dr. Bombay jokes.

      Hmm, strange. No one seems to have done so.

      I'm suddenly feeling so very old.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  36. yes i agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and maybe it'll push prices down here (wherever you/i are :)

  37. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People in the US sell their blood for personal profit. Or their babies. Or hire out their wombs. Selling parts of yourself for financial gain isn't exclusive to India, or even the developing world in general: it happens in the developed world too.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  38. more stuff to india? by snellgrove2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My goodness, sooner or later the whole world will end up in india! theres short term bonuses to be had at the moment, as its a poorer country, but surely if this keeps happening they'll eventually be as rich as the USA because of the amount of work and they'll want to outsource to here, as it'll be cheaper! ...maybe ;)

    1. Re:more stuff to india? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      "...but surely if this keeps happening they'll eventually be as rich as the USA"

      Uhhhhhhhh,,,, if this keeps happening, they'll have the USA's riches. We will have sent all of our capitol and future overseas.

    2. Re:more stuff to india? by easter1916 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given the performance of those in the US "capitol", sending it to India would be a public service. Sending US capital there, however, is not so good.

    3. Re:more stuff to india? by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      LOL! Agreed.

      Thanks for the spelling correction.

    4. Re:more stuff to india? by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For a relatively poor country they have a pretty decent education system; that's the key. Here in the U.S., the whole notion of broad public education has been under assault for the last couple of decades.

    5. Re:more stuff to india? by Adam_Trask · · Score: 1
      My goodness, sooner or later the whole world will end up in india!

      Indian Govt: Noooo, please...We already have more than 1 billion here.

  39. Medical Tourists by Rhinobird · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Medical Tourists.
    It's official, we live in a wierd science fictional dystopian society. "Medical tourists", It sounds like a term akin to "Organ Leggers" from Niven's Known Space. Go back, oh, 20 years and speak the term "Medical Tourist" and people wouldv'e given you blank stares. Not to long from now they will say, "Had my hip done in India, and my plastic surgery in Mexico."

    Since we live in a sci-fi world, I can't wait to get fitted for my one piece jumpsuit, and eating my soma infused soylent big brother.

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Medical Tourists by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      People from US have been going abroad to get sex reasignment surgewry since like the 50s. So medical tourists deifently existed

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  40. Already happening in the UK. by pklong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People are already being shipped abroad (not to india, but france the netherlands etc.) in Britain for treatment because the NHS cannot cope with the number of patients on the waiting lists. Also some are travelling to countries like Poland for cheap cosmetic surgery.

    Operations can and do go wrong and its not much good if your surgion is half way around the world when you get rushed into hospital. Also hospitals do plan for readmittance, which obviously they cannot do unless you are treated by them.

    Also I'm sure I don't need to spell out the problems that will be encountered if the patient needs ongoing treatment.

    In the UK when private operations go wrong the patient often gets dumped on the National Health Service.

    P.S. If you want my opinion, the US could do a lot worse than get itself a National Health Service. Access to healthcare should not be based on the ability to pay or what is covered on your insurance policy (if you can afford one.)

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

    1. Re:Already happening in the UK. by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      The US would do well to stay away from a UK-style NHS -- it's collapsing, and cannot cope with the number of patients on the waiting lists, as you note. The French system seems to work very, very well though.

    2. Re:Already happening in the UK. by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm in the UK, and in the last two years, my Mum has had a bunion removed in Krakow and a retinal examination in Turin. These were both provided on the NHS, though they could have been bought privately for a fraction of the UK cost - the main reason for going down this route was that the waiting lists for NHS treatment for these conditions, deemed non-essential though one stopped her from walking and the other stopped her from seeing, were well over a year.

      It's actually fairly unusual for a failed private op to be fixed by the NHS, becasue by and large the private sector refuses to get involved with the more risky procedures, prefferring to milk the cash-cow of routine tasks for which the NHS hasn't sufficient capacity. Bunion - private. Triple heart bypasses - NHS all the way.

  41. Re:it would definitely lower costs. by HawkinsD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boy, the process just accelerates every day, doesn't it?

    Given that large multinational companies are now figuring out how to outsource pretty much everything that Americans make a middle-class living at... How does a geek plan for the future?

    Not to be Mr. Negative-Pants, but the future appears to be one where a thin layer of prosperity on the level of a Pakistani bricklayer is smeared around the globe.

    So... how do we plan for this? Any creative ideas out there?

    --
    Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by mere idiocy.
  42. What? You mean New York? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania. Or maybe you were talking about California.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  43. Unwilling Organ Donar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you just disapear like many children in India to become an unwilling organ donar.

    Never trust anyone who shits in their own drinking water.

  44. Cost origins? by Epistax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a question that may look like a troll, but I'd like some real thoughts. I assume that hospital visits, operations, etc cost so much because of how much the hospitals must pay for their equipment. So, are there any ideas why hospital equipment costs so much? I thought I heard MRI's run in the hundreds of thousands. Heck, Maine has a mobile MRI bus.
    But even with this taken into consideration, hospital visits that don't touch any expensive machines are still very expensive. Is this to lower the cost of visits that do use expensive equipment? I still think this is explanation is on shaky ground as a $500,000 MRI might be used several thousand times. Does it really cost that much more for upkeep?

    Thanks for any info on this matter. It just doesn't seem correct.

    1. Re:Cost origins? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Drugs are tremendously expensive, and doctors (and nurses and other medical personnel) make healthy wages, and even small hospitals have a lot of them.

      Plus, many hospitals tend to be for-profit, so they charge as much as they possibly can for even minor procedures.

    2. Re:Cost origins? by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm forsaking moderating to reply!

      Background: I'm an Indian, I ride a bike and had a fall sometime ago going at 100+ kmph (ie 80+ MPH).

      The docs at Apollo Hospital (one of the best hospital chains in India) did MRI... total cost for MRI - Rs 6600! (that is around $330 for you).

      And all this after taking into consideration that the MRI equipment is IMPORTED... so they got to pay the shipping and excise/custom duties!!

      So, yeah, US docs are FLEECING you! Wake up.

      --
      - mritunjai
    3. Re:Cost origins? by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that, despite what opponents of national health insurance would have you believe, our system of private insurance - and the haphazard way we deal with the uninsured - adds heavy layers of bureaucracy that comsume a substantial percentage of the total health care dollar. I don't have figures in front of me, but I think I remember it being in the neighborhood of 40%...

    4. Re:Cost origins? by mritunjai · · Score: 2, Informative
      total cost for MRI - Rs 6600! (that is around $330 for you).
      Sorry for wrong figures in USD. The total expenditure in USD for MRI was around $150. This includes cost of medicines used for taking MRI, abdominal MRI and radiologist's fees and doc's fees. PS: CT Scans cost roughly the same too. - Mritunjai
      --
      - mritunjai
    5. Re:Cost origins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The for profit model prices the service at "what the market can bear". The lack of a national health care system removes any kind of downward price control on drugs and treatments.

      And, of course, our litigious society burdens hospitals and doctors with billions of dollars of liability insurance payments.

      But remember! This is all a good thing, according to President Bush. By moving vast sums of money from the pockets of lower and middle class Americans who need these services into the pockets of insurance companies, HMOs, lawyers and drug companies, who will then be looted by rich CEOs, our economy will prosper and we will move towards the ideal society (feudalism)...

    6. Re:Cost origins? by enormouspenis · · Score: 0

      Would just like to note that as Governor of Texas, Bush was one of, if not, the first State governor to push through a law allowing patients to sue HMOs for affecting care/malpractice. Now as a 4th year med student, I have to say that I work with Indian docs all the time and most are very competent. Interesting that you might fly to India, have a procedure, fly back--but wait!..then your Indian doc passess the boards, gets a work visa and comes here to do the same procedure in 3 years on your wife/husband for twice the money. Outsourcing in medicine has been happening for a very long time (elective surgery in Venezuela, Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico, etc. passed off to USA insurance companies as "traffic accident"). I can't avoid politics when I say NOBODY is going to stop the outsourcing of multinationals. It is common sense. Ask a fortune 500 accounting firm what countries they recommend for outsourcing and they have a list of 200 currently. HP, P&G, IBM on and on and on have done this for years. This didn't just happen in 2000 or even in 1992. Perhaps the answer is to incorporate individually and register yourself offshore. That is what I plan to do. OK thats all the incoherence I can manage without a nap.

      --
      "I didn't spend six years in Evil Medical School to be called 'Mr.Evil,' thank you very much!"
    7. Re:Cost origins? by mikelambert70 · · Score: 1

      You can get a CT scan in Malaysia for 150 ringgit, that's 40 dollars, in a modern private hospital (Gleneagles, full of specialists) in Kuala Lumpur (this is 3 years old information so the prices might have changed slightly). Modern Siemens machine, you even get to keep the pictures yourself.

      Similar prices in many hospitals in Thailand, afaik. There's absolutely no reason to go to India for medical tourism when there are Thailand and Malaysia. Malaysia's ringgit is even pegged to the US dollar so the prices will not fluctuate.

      Much less risks with hygiene in Thailand and Malaysia than in India. Sorry, but that's the way it is.

  45. Now they are outsourcing doctors! by DukeLinux · · Score: 1

    I had better tell my brother. He is a doctor and it would be funny to see him realize that all the time and money spent going to med school was a waste. I guess we will both have to become lawyers and sue our way to riches........

  46. Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Which airlines will carry a person,
    who tells them - up-front - that
    they have a heart or other serious
    medical condition?

    (And any insurance may not cover
    them if they don't tell them...)

    1. Re:Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by andy1307 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Which airlines will carry a person

      Umm..Air India? The nationally owned airline?

    2. Re:Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Your sig is incomprehensible.

    3. Re:Maybe... but... how will they get to India? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Which airlines will carry a person,
      who tells them - up-front - that
      they have a heart or other serious
      medical condition?


      All of em. Very common situation; in some instances they may prefer to have a doctor on board in case they need to operate the electrical paddles, but airlines fly people with all sorts of special conditions every day (I imagine after signing a few liability documents.)

      The exception to this is a person who is getting ready to give birth. It's a combination of they don't want that happening in air, and, sometimes, the receiving country doesn't want to deal with granting the child of a non-citizen citizenship.

      (If a baby is born on an airplane in international airspace, the convention is that the child is eligible for the citizenship of its parents in addition to the citizenship of where the airline is based.)

  47. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Australians are smart because we.... um ... split the beer atom!

  48. TB is rampant in London by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    So lets not use that as a measuring stick. Malaria isn't, but the only reason is the temperature and lack of Mosquitos.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  49. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WOAH

    There's a differerence between selling some plasma--actually re-producing some fresh blood can be a good thing, and having a couple of guys jump a guy and cut out his heart.

    Lets get some fucking perspective.

  50. The blame by rongage · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real blame if something like this REALLY happens is the doctors themselves...

    Here in Detroit, the costs of medical care are completely outrageous.

    I have had the "opportunity" to have some relatively benign medical proceedures done and the costs of these proceedures was astronomical

    Proceedure 1: Partial removal of ingrown toenail. $778.00
    Proceedure 2: earwax removal: $190.00

    I personally know that the ear-wax removal can be done for $50.00 at a place about an hour away. When you consider that the proceedure consists of the doctor looking in your ear (yep, there is a lot of wax in there), dumping a few drops of a chemical into your ear canal, telling you to lay on your side for 10 minutes (doctor leaves the room at this time to do something else), doctor returns after 10 minutes and squirts a lot of very cold water in your ear canal and the wax is now gone. Total time: 20 minutes.

    It's no wonder that someone would consider it reasonable to send medical work off to india. With the amount of overcharging that is "the way things are done" here, it's only a matter of time before things get shaken up...

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:The blame by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      The real blame if something like this REALLY happens is the doctors themselves...

      It's all about the malpractice insurance costs. Blame the lawyers.

      I have a friend who works in an emergency room. He's been sued for everything from making the patient itch or even touching the patient (in this emergency room, where they come in bloodied and half-dead). His insurance bills are $100,000/yr, and that was 3 years ago.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    2. Re:The blame by nomadic · · Score: 1

      It's all about the malpractice insurance costs. Blame the lawyers.

      Oh god, here we go again.

      Why not blame the juries? You know, the people who actually determine the verdicts?

      Or why not the insurance companies? They're the ones who determine the rates.

      Those cases you're complaining about, did the people actually win? I'm so goddamn sick of people whining about the legal system without knowing anything about it. You know how easy it is to sue someone? You just go down to the courthouse and fill out some paperwork. It's much, much harder to actually win a case. Hell, it's hard to even get a case to trial. Judges can (and often do) throw frivolous cases right away.

    3. Re:The blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toenail clippers ...... $1.49
      Box of Q-tips ......... $3.79

    4. Re:The blame by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      I guess you are unaware about this lawsuit between SCO and IBM in tune of 5 billion dollars? How about all those silly patent lawsuits?

      Insurance comapnies determine rates but higher coverage requires higher rates.

      I'm so goddamn sick of people whining about medical system without knowing anything aobut it. And I'm willing to bet that you are not a lawyer or a doctor.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    5. Re:The blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL... The mods missed it, I guess. :)

    6. Re:The blame by pchasco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is outlandishly expensive, but the answer isn't to offshore the medical field. The answer is to fix the healthcare system here in the US.

    7. Re:The blame by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I guess you are unaware about this lawsuit between SCO and IBM in tune of 5 billion dollars? How about all those silly patent lawsuits?

      Alright, now you're switching the subject away from medical malpractice. But fine, let's look at those cases.

      Has the court decided on SCO v. IBM? What the hell does it matter what the damages they're seeking are, they get to pick whatever they want. I could file suit against you for 90 trillion dollars if I wanted to. You can't just criticize the system because someone just decided to ask for a lot of money.

    8. Re:The blame by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Even when the claims are frivolous, you still have to go to court & pay a lawyer to explain what BS things are...

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    9. Re:The blame by nomadic · · Score: 1

      So the question becomes, do you want to put barriers up that will prevent people from suing? Like let a magistrate look over the papers and decide whether they can go on or not?

      The problem with that is you may get some magistrate with an agenda ("violation of EPA regulations? damn communists, I'm not letting this go through"). You put barriers up that people with legitimate complaints might often be unable to surmount.

      My point is it's simply a balance between giving people access to the justice system and preventing frivolous lawsuits, and not a question of horrible evil conspiring lawyers. At the moment the main check is at the judge level, which means people can file suit easily (leading to the hysterical anti-lawyer rants) but it's hard to get it to trial.

    10. Re:The blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Proceedure 1: Partial removal of ingrown toenail. $778.00
      Proceedure 2: earwax removal: $190.00
      I don't care if you're religious or not--everyone get down on your knees and thank your god(s) that there is no "User Photos" section on slashdot. Gives a new perspective to the word "trolling."
    11. Re:The blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Proceedure 2: earwax removal: $190.00

      You misunderstand, it's $50 for the procedure and $140 for the paperwork.

    12. Re:The blame by Bull999999 · · Score: 1

      While you do have a good point, the problem is that the "main check" still involves someone making decisions. If that person is right-leaning, more lawsuits will get thrown out, while a left-leaning person may allow more to pass. Even if we let a computer be the main check, there is always a chance that the programmer may be biased.

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    13. Re:The blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can do the earwax removal yourself at home! You can get the eardrops from the drugstore that come with a squeeze-bulb thingy; it foams up on contact with earwax, and the procedure is just as you described, for less than $10.

    14. Re:The blame by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

      Earwax removal:
      You can buy the earwax removal chemical at your local pharmacy without a prescription. Buy that and a rubber bulb and clear your own ears for around $10. The hard part is figuring out that earwax is the problem in the first place.

      I think we should get rid of malpractice insurance altogether. If a doctor does things right and well then he/she can save the money that would've gone to insurance premiums. If that doctor screws up then they're going to feel the pain of a lawsuit a lot more than if the insurance company shielded him/her from it. Some doctors would end up financially ruined, but (in theory) that would only happen to doctors who shouldn't be in practice in the first place. A patient who sued a relatively poor doctor might not get much recompense from a lawsuit, but I don't think that's any worse than our current situation. Why do we pay insurance companies? Insurance is just another word for gambling.

      --
      -Rich
  51. Outsourcing is about sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    The USA has been an economic powerhouse for some time, and Americans don't realise how well they have it. Indians on the other hand have to survive with very little money, and it just isn't fair. We will reach an equilibrium over time, and have a prosperous USA and India, through job outsourcing.

    The problem is, India faces major food shortages right now. They can't wait for outsourcing to bring them the money they need. That is where my proposal comes in.

    If we ship overfed American women to India, and then import the unfortunate, thin, and quite lovely Indian women back to the USA, we will finally have achieved social justice. Thank You.

    1. Re:Outsourcing is about sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great idea! How do I enroll my wife in this program? Do I get to pick her replacement out of a catalog?

    2. Re:Outsourcing is about sharing by VampireByte · · Score: 1
      If we ship overfed American women to India, and then ...



      Sounds good, we'll crate up Sally Struthers and send her over.

      --

      Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    3. Re:Outsourcing is about sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm. sarcastic it might be, but wrong in facts, like the typical TV-fed american.

      India has been self sufficient in food for ages now, and is a major exporter of grain in SE Asia.

      anyway.

  52. No Way.. Absolutely No Goddamn Way. by DaveRomigh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    *rant*
    Yknow what? I'd rather take my chances with a hospital in the US instead of being flown halfway across the world to India for ANYTHING - surgery, checkup, prescriptions - ANYTHING having to do with the medical profession.

    We're not talking about outsourcing code writers, or a call center here - we're talking about my life. The people who've been there, and had something done - great, glad for you, wonderful to hear it - but there's quite literally NO damn way I'm getting on a plane for ANYTHING in India. I don't care HOW clean they might claim to be, or how state-of-the-art their facilities are. Not going to happen.

    Find me Kevorkian before that happens.
    */rant*

    1. Re:No Way.. Absolutely No Goddamn Way. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a lot of chump change
      Most of us count our pennies. 20% of every dollar goes for our health care system. Something needs to be fixed. Our free economy is fixing it. Hop on the bus.

  53. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ummm, I think the difference in the things you listed is that they DO NOT REQUIRE YOU TO DIE, such as giving up your heart is wont to do.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  54. Dental care by aspelling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Beleive me, Hungary, Poland, Ukraine and other East Europeans countries have much better dentinst then States. The quality of work is excellent (once American materials became available). Don't forget that these dentists are trained as full MD first and then spend three years specializing in dentistry.

  55. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey neat. If I ever need a kidney, now I know where to go.

  56. The futures not bright by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe everyone is scared that the entire western world is being undercut by a bunch of people in some country half-way around the world who will work 10 times harder than any of us, accept a fraction of the wages and probably even do the job better! i dont know about you guys but that thought scares the absolute shit out of me, i reckon its time to join the exploiters at the top of the corporations - you've gotta make the fast buck now and retire or your job is gonna go - its time to kick everyone else off the ladder and scurry up now.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  57. Doctors required to have malpractice by HMOs by blackchiney · · Score: 1

    It's going to be interesting to see what the US doctors do when HMOs start sending patients abroad. HMOs require their doctors to carry malpractice insurance. And this takes up a considerable chunk of their income (some are as high as $250,000/annually, heart and neuro are the highest). If Indian doctors are not required to carry malpractice and thus undercutting USian surgeons I can see the shit storm coming from the AMA about this.

  58. How to lower every costs in the US by mst76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pay lawyer fees and awarded lawsuit damages in Indian Rupees.

  59. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'd be recommending checking out the great social welfare system that our western money buys the Indians. Or, wait? Will you see extreme powerty on your way from the luxery airport to the luxery hotel, and then from the luxery hotel to the luxery hospital?

    Well guess how they can be so damn cheap, I'd wager that the programmers are happy as hell that they aren't in the slum, and the companies are happy that they don't have to pay to clean up the slum.

    Think about that, next time you want to outsource something to India... Maybe you should demand that they spread our wealth a bit better when they get a piece of it.

  60. Doofus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there are no good jobs in the US for people, who in the fsck to you plan to sell to? Good jobs == good money! If everyone is flipping burgers, then who will buy high-tech products and services?

  61. What about equipment issues / export controls? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are certain pieces of medical equipment which cannot be exported outside of the US. Should doctors in India require these pieces of equipment for some ultramodern procedure, they may not be able to perform such procedures. I suppose this is what law makers and HMO execs would be chirping about when it comes around to this - Don't worry about these "low-level" jobs going offshore, we still have the "high-tech" stuff here to fill the niche!

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    1. Re:What about equipment issues / export controls? by Brahmastra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Doubt that's a problem considering General Electric is designing a lot of their medical equipment such as CT scan machines, etc in Bangalore

  62. Medical outsourcing has already begun by JavaNPerl · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are US hospitals which send their MRI images electronically to Indian companies which have a 24/7 staff of radiologists to interpret the images and send back the results. It is supposedly cheaper and faster according to a television show I saw, can't recall the show, it may have been on Tech TV. I do believe medical regulatory boards consisting of US doctors are going to make decisions which benefit US doctors. If the outsourcing trend became a major threat, I believe US doctors would employ some type of regulatory action to justify halting the trend. Doctors have had positions of status and wealth in the US for a long time and I don't think they are going to allow that positions slip away without a hard fight.

    1. Re:Medical outsourcing has already begun by Strych9 · · Score: 1

      I think that it is good that even the Doctors aren't safe.

      The more people affected means that there will be more people upset, which even Congress won't be able to ignore for long.

  63. This is nothing new by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    I know of people who fly to places like Belize or Jamaica to do surgery, paying for everything out of pocket at a cheaper rate than if they stayed in the US and paid the 20% their insurance companies required them to pay. Or their insurance doesn't cover the specific condition at all, so it works out much cheaper to fly overseas to get it done.

    For the procedures offered, the care is usually quite good. Many of the doctors studied in the US. In fact, I'm surprised that more people don't take advantage of less expensive medical care overseas, rather than sitting in the US and dying because they can't afford it.

    Having said that, US insurance companies should not be in the business of demanding that their customers go overseas before they'll pay for treatment. US insurance rates are based on the costs of treatment in the United States, so that's what policyholders should be given.

    It it is true that other countries can provide cheaper medical care partly because their laws don't allow you to file large malpractice lawsuits. Very often in the US, half of the cost you pay for a surgery is just to cover the risk of a malpractice suit. That is something we need to work on here in the US if we don't want to see the health care system reduced to nothing but emergency care and plastic surgery for the rich. Shakespeare said "let's kill all the lawyers", but the lawyers are killing us by driving medical costs out of the reach of millions of Americans.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  64. India is going to be #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is becoming a superpower, I guess.
    Indians are good at hardware and software.
    Now, they are good at medical field.
    There will be more coming soon, I think ...

  65. all that travel must be a bummer when you're sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could set up hospitals/clinics on the Mexican/Canadian borders, Barbados, Cuba, or hospital ships just outside territorial waters. Surgical cruises!

  66. Central America by jwjcmw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My mom goes down to Nicaragua pretty regularly with a civic group...the last trip she had a filling replaced by a dentist down there. She said it was the most pleasant dental visit of her life, and it cost $25...so it's not just India where things are going to be exported to.

    1. Re:Central America by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Well, here in NM, it's not too uncommon for people to go down to Mexico for dental work. A lady I worked with managed to get a moutful of crowns for less than what her co-pay would've been in the states.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  67. I wouldn't do it... by slykens · · Score: 0

    Having been to India four times myself and having had business colleagues have medical and dental work done while there I am of the conclusion that I wouldn't do it.

    Just to take the dentistry as an example, one colleague's implanted teeth are cracking and will have to be replaced, another colleague had a very bad infection from having had surgical material left under a tooth cap. Yes these things could happen in the US as well but in my direct experience every person I know who has had work done in India has had a complication or problem from it.

    I'm not sure if this isn't some sort of self-grandstanding on India's part. Listen to Vajpayee sometime and get an idea of the arrogance of some of the government there. Vajpayee one time told the world that India had the solutions to all of the world's problems, all we had to do was ask.

    After having travelled there several times I'll take our solutions any day.

    1. Re:I wouldn't do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen to Vajpayee sometime and get an idea of the arrogance of some of the government there.

      Evidently you havent listened to GWB yet?

  68. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    People in the US sell their blood for personal profit.

    They pay you for blood? In Canada they do it out of a sense of the common good. Selling one's blood to save a life is absolutely repugnant.

  69. Re:it would definitely lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit worrying so much and just go outside. Don't worry about being "prosperous"; be a poor person. Contrary to what tv, your mom, and other tv watchers tell you, being poor's not bad, going hungry sometimes is not bad, not being able to impress/fit in with people with a car or your clothes is not bad.

  70. This may actually work because... by Baldrson · · Score: 0, Troll
    Unlike computers which double in capacity every 18 months or so, and the environment within which computers must operate, the human body is a relatively stable standard. What you need to do good medicine is not continual innovation (the triode, computer and integrated circuit were all invented by guys from Iowa's land grant colleges, and the transistor from other land grant colleges in the midwest -- similar stories apply to medicine) rather you need refined application of whatever has been invented.

    India's inherently lower cost clan/cast social structure (something the West dispenses with as "nepotism" at best and "racism" at worst) is how they are winning economically. The west's monetization of even its women's years of fertility in the work place (resulting in the lower fertility rates here) has imposed inherently higher costs of life itself. The only question is whether the West has anything left after deracinating its peoples, substituting money for blood. I think it still has the edge on innovation simply because the process of selective breeding against inventive subpopulations has not had its full negative effects. Software has to be innovative everytime you sit down to solve a problem with it. Unless you are just translating a program (and even there to some extent) the only way someone gets to solve a software problem is if you either didn't really solve it or if someone is stupid enough not to profit from your having solved. But in application of invention in an unchanging environment, such as the human body, all you need is the ability to follow rules to some extent.

    Now the dangers of this approach to medicine are subtle and profound. The most obvious subtle danger is that as you shift resources away from the original populations that invented the technologies, it is unlikely you'll have the same rate of innovation. This is bad but at least you don't necessarily regress. What is worse is the fact that different human ecologies have different and sometime incompatible approaches to life. The fact that people are unaware of these approaches, and their incompatiblity is what may have caused the autism epidemic and left Indians in a position where they cannot be trusted to fix the problems they bring with them to the West.

    1. Re:This may actually work because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most obvious subtle danger is that as you shift resources away from the original populations that invented the technologies, it is unlikely you'll have the same rate of innovation.

      Throughout the history of humankind technology has been transferred between cultures
      The wheel probaly was invented somewhere in africa.
      Paper/ gun powder in china
      Arithmetic/surgery in India

      West has no monopoly to creativity or innovation
      Thats a ridiculous argument

  71. please outsource the malpractice lawyers! by frankmu · · Score: 2, Funny

    as a practicing ob/gyn, i hope they outsource some lawyers. preferably to antartica.

    there are some things that can't be outsourced still. trauma surgery and the Burger King Drive-through, for example

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
  72. this could help in ways other than... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... stopping the relentless rise in heath care expenses. It could save the domestic airline industry -- I can envision package deals wherein US airlines tie in with Indian medical facilities to deliver patients to the doctors.

    And I can all-too-easily see the US insurance companies and employers (of what few employees don't get "off-shored") pushing medical care outside the US.

    If only we could manage to "off-shore" our corporate management and lower the ratio between CEO and employee compensation --

    Now there's a bubble that's ripe to pop ...

  73. Great! by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    And to think, in ten years, there won't be any jobs worth a crap left in the USA for them to contract out to! Hooray!

    The working man is so screwed in this country.

    I think you need to realize something America. Those jobs ain't coming back. They ain't coming back ever. Limited trade works. It helped Japan not get swamped by American goods and then destroy their economy. It keeps it expensive, but it keeps Japan ALIVE. Now? This is just insane. You can't have an economy to give money to India if you don't have Americans working. Japan HAD to do this or get crushed under our industrial output. America has to do this or it will get utterly crushed by India and China's labor output. Period. This is akin to China and India being Wal-Mart, and you as Americans being the single shop owner. You have to think about it this way, the very lifestyle that you live will be dead in a generation if this keeps up. The floodgates are open. The decision if you want your city to be under water is obvious about what you have to do. Does it mean that your plastic crap from Wal-Mart is a little more expensive, yes. But this is predatory business. Don't think otherwise.

    I don't want to hear some Adam Smith crap about this. Adam Smith was about free market economy, this is destroying choice in the economy to the point that all tech support will come from India, and soon so will all manufacturing. Economies have to be regulated because individuals in massive corps will destroy choice and freedom in the economy, and this is happening. This is about keeping America from destroying the middle class, which keeps this country, and the freedoms, the education of it's system, and all of the free choices you have with your life.

    These practices destroy huge swaths of the middle class. Talk all you want about it, but without the middle class supporting your property tax in schools, you have CRAP SCHOOLS. Can't be done if you don't have a job. If you want to go to college you can in the middle class, can't be done if everyone is poor.

    In a generation, everyone will be much poorer. This is not a good thing for the next generation.

    Face it people. We peaked. The world now sees that and is trying to get there too. The bad part? They have fifty cent hours and six times the people. We have to watch what our free trade situation is.

    Right now it is damn near a free labor situation.

    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're going to have crap schools when everybody's salaries are cut in half, what kind of schools does India have?

  74. Capitolism=Prostitution by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

    Wow! I can start to see the boomer generation being warehoused in India instead of the nursing homes in the US. Then you will need all the support services (drugs, McDonalds, CostCo, Bruce Springsteen, etc.) shipped out there as well.

    We can have an absentee country! Much better than the Paved Earth idea (everyone gets issued a RV and we all live in the parkinglots of Wallmart). The more I think about it, anything can be shipped overseas, even shipping.

    I look forward to the future.

    And all the politicans who created this mess being left behind (well, I guess prostitution won't be outsourced after all).

    How do you say "Fuck me you big silly" in Hindi?

    1. Re:Capitolism=Prostitution by tarunthegreat · · Score: 1

      The answer to your question is: Abey Mujhe chodhle, maderchod (Why don't u fuck me, motherfucker) I suggest this post be mod-ed informative

  75. India hard work a myth by tjstork · · Score: 1


    If India worked so hard...

    They would have built their own country up by developing their own domestic infrasture the same way Americans did. Instead, they have to hock off their labor force as cheap to other countries because they no initiative to do anything with their own.

    India's and the rest of the third world's export market to the US is a bigger get rich quick scheme than even US corporations foist upon the world. If the people in India want to work so cheap that they will provide the goods and services of the United States for the price that we dole out on welfare, for a currency backed by nothing, then we should let them.

    Chop chop little buckaroos, build me more stuff. I got $5, I want a car. The chinese will do it for $4. Can you match!

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:India hard work a myth by PaneerParantha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In my experience of working in three different countries, there are three kinds of people:
      1. People who work very hard and are heads and shoulders above others in productivity. There are very few such people.
      2. People who work hard and are productive.
      3. People who are seat-warmers. According to something I read yesterday, perhaps at slashdot, 71% of American workforce is like that, but I don't believe it.

      The above three kinds of people exist everywhere, irrespective of the country.

      That India didn't build up an infrastructure has nothing to do with lack of work or otherwise of Indians. It has something to do with bottled-up economy, the license-permit regime and several other factors. Now that this regime is in the process of being dismantled, infrastructure is being built rapidly.
      * See, for example, http://surajsphotos.fotopic.net/ for images of new roads and buildings being built in India.
      * Go to www.nhai.org, the website of National Highways authority of India to look at other projects.
      * Go to http://www.delhimetrorail.com/home/index.htm, to see how the Delhi Metro Rail project has made strides in the past years.
      * Here is some more about building of infrastructure in India:
      - AMP to raise $129m for India fund venture
      http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/02/09 /10761751 05694.html
      - http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2004/02/13/sto ries/2004021301210400.htm
      New Delhi , Feb. 12

      THE country is poised for a grey revolution with the construction sector entering a boom phase to meet the demand for new highways, ports and real estate, according to the Union Commerce and Industry Minister, Mr Arun Jaitley.
      ----
      If you are interested, I can give you more news about the boom in infrastructure development in India.

      If Indians weren't hard-working, why would this be occurring?

      If you pedal a bicycle rickshaw throughout a hot, dusty day ferrying passengers for a few cents, aren't you working hard?

      If you work in fields, sowing and harvesting while the temperatures rise to 50 degree celsius, isn't that hard work?

      If you hawk your wares on a bicycle or a cart amidst dense traffic, immense noise for a life time, isn't that hard work?

      If you sit by roadside breaking stones with primitive pickaxes day after day, isn't that hard work?

      And this is not specific to India, most developing countries have such work, and most developed countries too have the equivalent. Most humans are hard working.

  76. So what kind of training have you had? by spineboy · · Score: 2, Informative
    A typical MD has had 4 years of college (most MDs have a GPA >3.5 so there's college and then there's college)

    4 "years" of Med school (typically 2-3x the work load of what most colleges will limit students)

    3-6 "years" of residency (again working 80-130 hrs/week - one-two days off a month so it's equivalent to 10-15 years job experience)

    Most surgeons I know work 80 hours/week(think of it as 2 jobs) and are on beeper call 24/7 to their patients, except on rare ocasions.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:So what kind of training have you had? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe they are the hardest working angels on earth but I would still like to have the option of making my own choices. I should be free to seek medical advice wherever I want and to take whatever medical prescriptions I desire. It is my life at risk and I should be free to have the choice.

      If they are so hard working and working for low wages, why are they afraid of competition? Why do they want the government to make choices for their clients the patients? Why does the medical association spend so much time and money lobbying?

      I had 4 years of very tough engineering school. GPA 4.0

      I did 2.5 years for Masters.

      I spent 10 years designing hardware and writing embedded code for systems that had to work.

      I am a self employed right now and spend almost all my wake up time figuring out how to sell products and services or working on my products and services.

      It is difficult for me to belive that there are many people working harder.

  77. The real american skill by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is playing third world countries off against each other to force ever lower salaries. The US is the greatest organization ever made. We made ourselves rich, and now the rest of the world wants a piece, so now, we get to play with our dough, doing nothing, while we say: "oh, Indian can do it for $10, but the Chinese can do it for $9, can you match!"

    After India has its little boom and starts to get pricey, then, we will start training computer programmers and doctors in Latin America and Africa.

    Hah! In the meantime, when you take my job as a programmer, just keep in mind that when I'm pumping gas I'll still be making more than you! And if you think you are going to get more, we Americans will replace you with people from Africa, then from Latin America, and then we will build robots, and then make robots to build our robots for us, and we won't need you any more.

    Your dream of becoming a first world nation based solely on exports is a false one.

    --
    This is my sig.
  78. My take on this by caesar79 · · Score: 1

    Hi,
    lets leave the cost factor aside for a moment.
    Too many people consider medicine as a well defined science. It isnt. To a large extent it is an empirical science with a lot of guesswork, albeit educated guesswork, on the part of the physician. After a lot of diagnostic tests, the physician is given an incomplete list of symptoms. Based on those, the physician has to decide what the root cause is, and how to treat it.
    In the US and in many other developed countries, little or no leeway is given to the physician to make mistakes, especially when they have only a single attempt. If they fail, they are hit with a huge lawsuit.
    In less developed countries, physicians usually have more leeway. In addition, they usually treat a much larger number of patients, and this experience gained helps them make better guesses.
    In summary, medicine is still an emprical science, with a hell lot of guesswork involved. Any one who expects 100% accuracy is misguided.

  79. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by tlongrie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Come on guy, get real! The few bucks they give out to entice people to give blood is hardly something that generates personal proffit. As a U.S. resident for the last 33 years I've yet to see these "baby stores" or "womb rentals" you speak of.

  80. We we be going there. by pablo_max · · Score: 1

    Trust me friends, they will be comming here. My last THREE HMO doctors were Indian. One was great, the other two....well not so much. Its far cheaper to bring them here and pay them less then it is for us to go there. Besides the whole medical scene is changing anyway...my last doctor wanted people to pay a retainer fee on top of everything else. I think not. There is something wrong when I get X-rays and a Cast and the bill is over 3 grand for less then 20 min of work. Ok..better stop talking about this, my blood pressure is going up and i cant afford our doctors.

  81. This is what we get thanks to our big gov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India is going to get it right, unless USA gov gets the fuck out of health care business here and lets companies here get it right... Indians are going to create a large city that will be like a car manufacturing plant. It will be cheaper and better to go there and go on this assembly line of tests and procedures that will cure most of your problems. Why do expensive procedures in 30 cities in the usa when you can just fly the people to a place for cheap and have the procedures done in assembly line kind of way. Economies of mass production, the costs of travel compared to the savings in the redundancy in medical stuff will be huge. An amazing benefit to humanity at the expense of current medical bureocracy. I cant wait for my future yearly visit to Bombay wwhere all my medical problems will be loked at in one long visit for a fraction of the cost

  82. US Medical School Cartels keep prices high by billstewart · · Score: 1
    One reason that doctors cost so much in the US is the limited capacity of medical schools, which restricts the supply of doctors, and the immigration laws and medical licensing laws which make it somewhat hard for doctors to move here from other countries (though there are a lot that do). It does keep the quality high, but the supply is low, which means that doctors can and do charge more.

    Nurses are a different market - schooling is widely available, and even though society is much less sexist than 30 years ago and women have more job choices besides nursing and teaching, there are still lots of nurses and their pay is quite low. That doesn't mean that hospitals and HMOs don't try to minimize the number of them they use, of course, but they aren't a big part of the cost base.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  83. Why The Hell Not? by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Sure, it'll take a while before shipping is cheap enough that items as heavy as major appliances can be shipped for repairs, but it's not inconceivable. Right now, customers ship items as large as CRT monitors and microwaves back to the company for repairs. Sticking a fridge on a truck and driving it to Mexico is the next level.

    There is no such thing as a permanent economic niche. The most you can hope for is that your occupation is not made obsolete until you retire.

  84. Painful as outsourcing is, nothing can stop it by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    If stuff can be done more economically someplace else, thats where it will get done. If we make that illegal, it will just get done illegally.

    The transition is going to be painful for the 'First World', and ultimately we will be somewhat poorer. That's just how it is.

    It's not the end of the world...we will all make less money, but that will drive down prices. We are in for major deflation in the next decade...and places like India will see major inflation.

    We won't starve or freeze to death. Most of what we buy with this excess wealth doesn't enhance our lives much in the long run anyhow. Driving a sloppy road whale or watching sitcoms on huge plasma tv's is not exactly the path to happiness and enlightenment.

  85. Call The Well Driller! by Vagary · · Score: 1

    You won't need a real estate agent if the only person in the country who can afford to buy your house is the well driller -- hopefully you kept their business card?

    Seriously: why can't a well driller be replaced by a robot? Or by someone who flies in from overseas? Neither of them will want to buy your house.

    1. Re:Call The Well Driller! by jbplou · · Score: 1

      You think in the next 20 years there will be robots drilling wells, do you also believe there will be flying cars?

  86. China by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    My Mother-in-law twice went to China to have operations that would have been far too expensive for her in the US.

    1. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did she catch SARS, Bird-flu..........or any of those infinite diseases that spread out of China to the rest of the world?

    2. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did she catch SARS, Bird-flu..........or any of those infinite diseases that spread out of China to the rest of the world?

      I think you spend too much time with newspapers.

    3. Re:China by TCBandersnatch · · Score: 1

      Ever wonder why virtually every western worker in China is cautioned to get to Hong Kong at all costs if serious medical attention is required?

      By the way, it took the WHO a month or more just to get Chinese authorities to allow doctors to evaluate the SARS outbreak on site. Sounds like a health care system you can trust.

  87. Is this is a freaking joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Don't be surprised when your physician prescribes you a trip to Bombay. Indian officials are working hard with HMOs around the world to make this dream come true


    This is no dream, ITS A NIGHTMARE! Is this how the Republicans intend to fix our healthcare system? This is beyond crazy.

  88. I'm going to feed the troll by Greyfox · · Score: 0, Troll
    1) You won't find a job pumping gas sorry. Flipping burgers maybe...

    2) Your cost of living is also (much) higher, which is one of the reasons that guy in india is less expensive.

    3) The next outsourcing dream destination is probably Iraq or Afghanistan.

    4) This will probably reduce the overall number of cars in the USA and increase them elsewhere. As there are more people in other countries the overall number of cars in the world will go up. Since we will eventually control the entire world's oil supply soon (I bet we're looking for an excuse to invade Saudi Arabia...) our oil companies will soon become the richest entities on the planet.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  89. $50?! by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got ferrets. I'd be happy to let one help you eradicate that ear wax for $40! They seem to go for that sort of thing... They'll also clear out any boogers you have (This would make a great Dave Barry feature...)

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  90. Opportunity rover fixes dishwashers by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I repair *physical* things each day as do the 29 other (wo)men that I work with each day. You can't really ship a fridge or air conditioner to India, fix it, and ship it back.

    As soon as the bandwidth gets up there a ways, Spirit and Opportunity-like remote robots may be doing that stuff, with stereo vision and microscopes. Don't count it out. Physical stuff may be even easier to offshore because it may require even less English skills, unlike software development. Thus, the "remoters" can be from a country even cheaper than India.

    The only "safe" career seems to be sales and marketing for trendy items. These require subtle knowledge of local culture, something a foreigner would not have easy access to. Unfortunately you will likely be fired when you get "too old" to be "hip" though.

    Not a good century to be a worker in America.

  91. Unemployment Line by shaark78 · · Score: 0

    Doctors please join the unemployment line over there right behind those programmers.

  92. You get what you pay for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do not mess with Indian health care. The quality of health care over there is very low. You don't want to have anything done there. Stay away at all costs.

  93. Stem cells and Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The medical holiday trend will be accelerated even more if the religious boneheads in the U.S. manage to get much of the stem cell research banned, and it all goes to India and China.

    Or, an Indian research consortium might empliment the proposal outlined at; www.gen.cam.ac.uk/sens/ and make the entire health care system as we know it today obsolete within 10-15 years.

    Since the religious, luddite, and other wankers in the U.S. are hellbent on trying to regulate or ban these technologies; all the biotech and nanotech will be outsources to Asia as well. So, these turkeys will really crater the U.S. economy.

  94. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by necrognome · · Score: 1

    People in the US do not sell their blood for personal profit. The whole point of "blood drives" is to get people to donate blood. If cash were offered in exchange for blood, the Red Cross would never have to urge people to donate blood, would it? Blood != Sperm. RTFM!

    --


    Let's get drunk and delete production data!
  95. Great, now they're going to outsource my doctor by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    Actually this has already started. X-rays are read by doctors in India and so are a lot of pathology slides these days. This is just the next step.

    The same principle applies to programming as medicine and anything else we ship overseas. They can charge lower prices because it's cheaper to do business over there. They don't have US taxes, US work place regulations to deal with, US insurance rates or US courts. You make 900 a month over there you're upper middle class. 900 a month here you're sharing a trailer with three other people while riding your bike to work. And you're hungry most of the time because you're trying to figure out how to feed yourself on 200 a month.

    I think some of the extra cost of doing business here happens to be worth it not to live in a cardboard box ghetto.

    I'm wondering where this is all going to end and what's going to be left of our country when we get there.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  96. you are a sucker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahhahwhahahahawahhaha

  97. From what I hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indian docs are way better than american ones because of the vast number of patients they treat.

  98. Re:I have lived in the US and Bangalore- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Bangalore and can rant about how bad the roads, pollution, traffic, infrastructure is..
    but I can personally tell you that medical facilities are among the best in the world for 1/5th the cost.

    I was in the US for 2 years. During that time, my wisdom tooth made my life miserable. I could not get the tooth removed in my town because there was no qualified dentist. I had to go to a town 3 hours away if I wanted it removed. And it would cost me 350 $ because I was not eligible for dental insurance.
    Also, I was told that recovery would be 2-3 weeks.
    Guess what, during the summer I took a plane home and a week later and for 29 $ the dentist removed my wisdom tooth in less than 5 minutes.
    I'm not saying that going to India was a good idea but the cost difference is phenomenal.

    Medicines that cost 50 $ in the US are available for 5-6 $ and those that cost 100-150 are available for 8-10. And these medicines are made by the subsidiaries of Aventis, Glaxo Smithkline etc.

    I can make a prediction that will eventually come true- if the dollar does not depriciate against the yuan, yen, etc, expect a growing chunk of your medical research to come India's way. Oh, and if bush gets re-elected.

    Medical Research might be in its infancy but it offers 10 times the cost savings compared to the US. Serious.

    It is cheaper(4/10ths to 1/2 than in the us) to get medical treatment here.

    One point about the BBC story- medical treatment is very cheap compared to the US. but it is very costly for a majority of Indians.

    I do not expect them to get good medical treatment from government hospitals except in a few states for a nominal cost. This is changing but it will take a lot of time.
    --
    Posted AC because got too many friends here on /.

  99. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I've heard of people being paid to give blood, but I've never met a person who has done it. I have met many people who have donated blood out of a sense for the common blood. I'm one, but my body doesn't take to donating blood, so they told me I didn't have to. I have sold plasma, which is blood parts, but that is a different thing. Plasma is taken twice a week, and it takes a lot longer (3 hours vs 1 hour), so it is fair to get some payment for the time. I'd give plasma for nothing though if there was a place nearby to do so.

  100. Very bad blood supply by Screaming+Lunatic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I would be very wary about getting surgery in India. My cousin went back to India to get a kidney transplant that his mother was donating. He ended up getting hepatitis during the operation.

    The quality of service from hospital to hospital varies dramatically. And the blood supply is not trustable.

  101. Sounds good to me by bluGill · · Score: 1

    I can't belive all the negative on this. It sounds like a good idea. If my HMO offered me a choice: get your care at the local hosptial, or we will fly you to India, and you can get the same thing there, plus the nurses will spend more time with you, and the quality will be at least as good. I'd go for it. And I'd make sure that my flight back was delayed for a few weeks while I toured a country I've never been to before.

    Assuming the medical care is just as good, where is the downside?

  102. Pharmaceuticals lobby by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Speaking of costs and capitalism, there have been some nasty spats between India and US pharmaceuticals companies if I recall correctly. It's not difficult to recreate a drug - the only protection the US companies have is patent law. India baulked at the costs that were demanded, weighed up the choice of letting people die or violating copyright and (good for them) started knocking off the drugs themselves.

    What I'm interested in here however is, should more spats happen, will this weaken the pressure that the pharmaceuticals companies apply to doctors. I know that in Britain, GPs (General Practioners) are routinely courted with hotel stays, fancy meals and any other way they can get around the UK's laws on these issues; and from what I've heard they have much greater sway in the US.

    So are you less likely to be perscribed something you don't need in India? And if their healthcare is socialised, does that mean the doctor is more likely to have your interests at heart? It looks that way.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    1. Re:Pharmaceuticals lobby by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't track healthcare issues so I'm not sure what happened with that drug issue. Basically, India (or perhaps one province?) was producing generic drugs. You know, the non-brand-name stuff. I think it's still going on but not sure...

      And if their healthcare is socialised, does that mean the doctor is more likely to have your interests at heart?

      What the article talks about is privatized healthcare for a few elites (the elites being people from the West, who are automatically wealthy compared to Indians.) So the national healthcare system will have no impact. If anything, I would think that these healthcare companies will be US-based with operations performed in India.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    2. Re:Pharmaceuticals lobby by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      If anything, I would think that these healthcare companies will be US-based with operations performed in India.

      That's interesting... so for now the same commercial pressures exist for any 'medical tourists.' I bet that once the market develops further though, and perhaps providing this service to foreigners becomes more common in India, then local businesses will supplant the US ones, with US companies being limited to getting the customers. I don't see the US maintaining any grip except in the short term.

      This might be good for US healthcare in the same way that Linux has been good for Windows (forcing an improved service), or it could be bad in the same way that Private Health Care in the UK is bad for the NHS (creating a two-tier system).

      I only hope it doesn't encourage India's health care system to move towards a US model.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  103. There might be a future in pumping gas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...and our future is pumping gasoline? I think most people pump it themselves actually.

    Not unless you live in New Jersey. You can't pump your own gas because of a state law, which explains why all stations over there are full-serve only. What's the reason for that law anyway?

    Heed the word victims of outsourcing, there is a reason to move to New Jersey!

  104. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and having travelled from one end of India to another, I've never seen a "hearts for sale" sign anywhere. Furthermore, I've yet to read of even one person who's obtained a heart or other critical organ from a healthy developing world donor in exchange for cash. Yet I have heard (several times, in fact) of people in the US arranging to have babies for other people and being "compensated" for their efforts or of surrogate births.

    In other words, what the original poster said about organs for sale in India is pretty much hearsay but there's documented evidence of blood, babies and wombs for rent in the US. If you don't believe that this stuff happens then just click some of the links that appear when you google for the word "surrogacy".

    QED.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  105. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are mistaken saying that medical facilities in India are on par with those in the United States. This just isn't true, unless you count the facilities that India has for large scale treatment of the many widespread ailments which plague the country, like diarrhea.

  106. two words.. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    no way..

    No way in hell, ever. These people have no concept of sanitation. They throw their dead in the same river they bathe in, drink from, and wash clothes in.

    I would rather DIE than go to that country for even a paper cut...

  107. 7-11 by bl8n8r · · Score: 1

    Cool. I can gas up my car, get a Squishy, flip through a porno mag, and have my heart valve replaced all at the neighborhood 7-11. You know, maybe capitalism can work out a way to ship all the Americans to India, and bring all the Indians to America!! Think how much money that would save a company! electricians, programmers, nuclear scientists, garbage truck drivers, hookers, everything would be so much cheaper!

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  108. Just not possible by scottnews · · Score: 1

    If you've ever seen someone go through the process of a hip or knee replacement, then you would know that a 12+ hour plane ride with their knee in a prone position is just not possible.

    I'm sure some medical things might be able to be outsourced, but not replacement surgery.

  109. problem that we know of.. by xot · · Score: 1

    Everything about Doctors in India is as good as any doctor anywhere else or maybe better but theres a slight problem like someone said in this postt.Its sanitation n hygiene.
    The standard of hygiene is very different from hospital to hospital.Somethings can really shake you .I have experienced this myself.I was admitted to a sub standard hospital but only because the orthopaedic surgeon there was the one of the best in bombay.And you def want a better Doc than a better hospital when you are going in for a dozen surgeries(like i did) and a small mistake can leave you handicapped for life.
    But things are improving and most big hospitals here are world standard.

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  110. supply and demand by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The sky-high cost of American medicine, and consequently the cost of insurance, and therefore civilized life in America, is governed mainly by supply and demand. As a former premed student, I know that much of the medical "education" program is a system to weed out those who aren't sufficiently motivated (usually by cash) to complete the certification. Having worked fulltime in NYC-area hospitals, large and small, as well as with private doctors, I know that the filters produce a workforce of moneygrubbing party-liners, with bare competence to heal, and a small percentage of "stars" who create the reputation for excellence that the rest of their industry rides on.

    The best change for consumers of medicine in America (practically all of us) would be merely to open more schools, graduate more doctors. That process could be jumpstarted by perferring for admission certified foreign doctors from countries with comparable medical educations, filtered by standardized tests and interviews. Right now, foreign doctors typically must throw away all credit for their foreign educations and careers, no matter how worthy, when "starting over" in the US. If we doubled or tripled the supply of certified doctors, we could cut the costs through the resulting competition. Instead, we have price fixing among a cartel which mainly acts as bouncers for insurance companies and pushers for drug companies. As our demand rises, we should see economies of scale, not a debilitating crisis of artificial scarcity.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  111. Truly, an anonymous COWARD by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Ok, you're a cowardly fuckwit hiding behind an AC post. Good, let's play.

    "Yah, in the United States of America, "high caste" and "low caste" are called "white" and "black."

    There are lots of poor white people with no power or money here. And lots of Black people with gobs of both.

    "How many black software developers have you met in your lifetime? I've spent 25 years in the IT business, and in that entire time I've only ever met 2 black software professionals. "

    Ahh, the racial holier than thou thing. I've NEVER met a black software developer. Come to think about, I can only recall a handful of black guys in CIS classes back when I was in college. BUT....there were plenty of black guys IN college, just in different fields.

    So what does this mean? Frankly, I think geeky things just don't appeal to most black males. I know very cool b

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Truly, an anonymous COWARD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are lots of rich people from the lower castes in India. In fact since there has been a 50% reservation for the lower caste people in EVERYTHING from medical college seats to seats in the premier IITs and IIMs and even in government jobs, the distinction between lower and upper caste people is social and not economical any more. Also it is now in the minds of a few people who chose not to *grow up* - the Ku Klux Klanners from the 'bible belt' of India - by analogy.

      And as for lower caste people in college - there is actually a similar controversy to that for affirmative action admissions that we say over here - as agains a preference given to colored people, in India there is actually a law that says 50 percent of the seats HAVE to go to lower caste people. So a lower caste student with a gpa of 2.0 might get into a school but an upper caste student with a 3.5 might not.

  112. Re:it would definitely lower costs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that large multinational companies are now figuring out how to outsource pretty much everything that Americans make a middle-class living at... How does a geek plan for the future?

    Not to be Mr. Negative-Pants, but the future appears to be one where a thin layer of prosperity on the level of a Pakistani bricklayer is smeared around the globe.

    So... how do we plan for this? Any creative ideas out there?


    Why not join an Open Source project? That way, instead of having your hard work outsourced to India, you can screw those Indians over because you're willing to work for free.

  113. A story by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    Too late for most people to see this, but here goes.

    My wife is from the Philippines, a place which has decent medical care. When we had a trip over there a couple of years ago, we asked the insurance company if they would cover us while there. The lady said "Yes, it's not a problem, just send your medical bills in when you get back and we'll reimburse you. And, by the way, we recommend Makati Medical Center if you need a hospital, but anywhere will be reimbursed."

    Now, coming from an insurance company, that sounded wierd. In the US, you have to go to certain facilities, etc.

    Anyway, long story short, my son ended up with some horrible virus and had to go in to the hospital for three days. The total, bill, which was padded when they realized my wife lived in America, was about US$200.

    I joked with my wife then that the insurance company will probably require us to go back there for care if it's not life-threatening. Given the cost of a hospital room in the US, it would be cheaper to fly over there (about $1K/ticket) for anything more than an overnight stay.

    Anyway, I saw this coming. It'll force the insurance/medical industry in the US to start competing, which is a good thing.

  114. New television show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Discovery channel now announce the latest program for the next season: "Iron Surgeons" where top surgeons compete against challengers to do complex operations in the least amount of time.

    1. Re:New television show by nacturation · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, that show got cancelled. The new one is called "Trading Kidneys" where a US doctor and an Indian doctor need to transplant each others kidneys into themselves.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  115. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not join an Open Source project? That way, instead of having your hard work outsourced to India, you can screw those Indians over because you're willing to work for free!

  116. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

    Oh, pooh. MANY CEOS have given up their hearts and still keep on going without dying. Hello, Carly?

  117. What HMO Really is by Poligraf · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'd consider your rant to be a typical one for clueless anticorporate types.

    HMO is a desperate (and failing) attempt to control skyrocketing medical costs. Traditional system includes the insurance company and doctors as separate entities with the doctor making any decisions they want and insurance just footing the bill.

    Unfortunately, newer expensive treatments ( http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96859&cid=8283 832 ) and general health degradation in the US caused insurance to experience losses.

    So, they decided to hire their own doctors and put them through the cost-control through the approval of procedures.

    Eventually many other non-HMO companies followed suit. They now need to approve certain medical procedures beforehand, otherwise the doctor is not getting reimbursed.

    Even despite all of this crap, the costs for the customers (i.e., these who pay premiums for the healthcare) continue growing. Major cause: expensive drugs and more people requiring them permanently.

    To the contrary to the popular belief, lawsuits are not he culprit of the major cost rise at the medical insurance level, but they greatly affect doctors themselves and their malpractice insurance causing many doctors to drop out of practice in certain litigious areas.

    P.S. I used to contract at a small healthplan company.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:What HMO Really is by afidel · · Score: 1

      So your saying that my general practicioners $100+K/year malpractice insurance isn't a major problem?!?!? Not only that but if you do deliveries (most good GP's used to) you are advised to carry that insurance for 20 YEARS after your last delivery because some idiot might come back after you and claim that the reason their kid didn't get into the ivy league is that you somehow mishanled the delivery. I hate the whole situation, I hate that costs are spiraling out of controll and I hate the fact that the legislatures response in my state is to cap malpractice awards. As a good example my uncle was in having surgery to relieve the pain from a herniated disk in his lower back, due to the complete malpractice of the doctor he is now a parapaligic almost a quadrapaligic, in my state his damages would have been capped at a couple hundred thousand, not even enough to pay for his follow-on medical treatment, let alone all the new infrastructure his life requires like chair lifts, ramps in his house, nursing care, and then we get into lost wages, suffering, mental anguish for him and his family. Basically his life was ruined but because idiots can't be stopped from suing over trivial shit he would not be able to get anything resembling a just outcome.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:What HMO Really is by ben_white · · Score: 1
      As a good example my uncle was in having surgery to relieve the pain from a herniated disk in his lower back, due to the complete malpractice of the doctor he is now a parapaligic [sic] almost a quadrapaligic [sic], in my state his damages would have been capped at a couple hundred thousand, not even enough to pay for his follow-on medical treatment, let alone all the new infrastructure his life requires like chair lifts, ramps in his house, nursing care, and then we get into lost wages, suffering, mental anguish for him and his family.

      This just isn't the case! NO state has caps on direct economic damages. The trial lawyer associations run commercials that suggest that persons injured by true medical malpractice will not be awarded adequate compensation. All limits I am aware of, and the only limits up for consideration at the federal level, limit non-economic damages only. This includes damages for things such as pain and suffering, and in most cases punitive damages (which are rarely awarded in malpractice cases anyway). The most likely cause of your uncle's poor recovery is incompetent or greedy legal representation. If his attorney did not ask for certain direct economic damages such as your examples of future medical needs, or underestimated such needs, then he can not go back later and ask for more after a judgment or settlement. If his attorney pushed him into a settlement telling him that his recovery of direct economic damages was limited to $200,000, he was misinformed (I would of course be happy to be educated if your state has laws that I am unaware of).

      I have had patients who have been talked out of settlement offers by their attorneys that included future medical expenses not expressly limited by the settlement. Their attorneys pushed them into cash settlements instead. I am convinced that this is because it is easy to calculate and take 30-50% of cash settlements, but undefined future medical care doesn't line the attorneys' pockets the same immediate way.

      To reiterate: Direct economic damages (ie future medical care, lost wages, cost of necessary equipment) are NOT limited by liability caps, but may be limited by a poor plaintiff's attorney who underestimates those costs by incompetence or in an attempt to get a quick settlement of which he/she immediately takes 30-50%. Medial tort reform now under consideration at the federal level limits the non-economic damages only (ie pain, suffering, mental anguish, and punitive damages).

      Flame shields up!

      Ben

      --
      cheers, ben

      Never miss a good chance to shut up -- Will Rogers
    3. Re:What HMO Really is by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Even despite all of this crap, the costs for the customers (i.e., these who pay premiums for the healthcare) continue growing. Major cause: expensive drugs and more people requiring them permanently.

      You've only touched upon a couple of the problems with the health care system in the United States.

      Basically, the problem is that people are disconnected from paying prices and evaluating tradeoffs efficiently.

      If everyone were required to pay something for medical care, even if it's only 2% of the cost, then more expensive treatments would be part of the equation of whether to get them done. It's not currently. Worse, expensive needless diagnostics are ordered in a CYA fashion because doctors know their malpractice insurance will go up unless they cover bases in case of lawsuit.

      Finally, the doctors stick together (it's just like police officers), the trial lawyers stick together, and the health care buying groups stick together to milk the system for whatever they can. All of these groups lobby heavily to prevent the system from becoming more streamlined. Of course, they all want their own respective industries to self-regulate. And they can buy politicians to agree with that point of view.

      Try a few things to see how totally fuck3d up the system is...

      • Find an freely-available, honest complete assessment and ranking of doctors in your area, including prices charged for basic procedures.
      • Find out if bad doctors merely moved to another state.
      • Ask your good doctor why he's leaving the practice (hint: dealing with insurance forms and low medicare/medicaid reimbursement rates.)
      • Try to get a prescription filled by a nurse.
      • Ask an ob/gyn how much malpractice insurance costs and how many juries understand what reasonable risks are.
      • Ask your investment broker how revenue on sales for pharmaceutical companies compares with other industries.
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  118. My Indian hospital experience was a nightmare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend and I were on a "super-deluxe" bus in India travelling from Jaipur to Udaipur. About halfway into the trip the bus came into a 90 degree corner way too fast, left the road and flipped over demolishing a small brick building. A man nect to me was killed as was the woman in front of me. Ny girlfriend ended up with a displaced vertebrae as well as 2 splinters on c5.....but this wasn't discovered until we got back to small town Canada. the doctors in New Delhi, at one of the best clinics recommmended by the Canadian consul completely missed the injury. They said my girlfriend had whiplash and needed rest. she was in the hospital for a week and when she was released we tried to keep travelling. She still couldnt sit up by herself and after 2 weeks we finally decided to return home. She was in so much pain that when we got home she checked into the local emergency room in Kamloops and after an xray they said she wasn't leaving. They found the splinters and dislocation and fused 3 vertebrae the next morning. I couldn't believe that the supposedly expert doctors in Delhi failed to find what the ER doctors in small town BC found immediately. As far as I'm concerned the Delhi doctors were incompetent and more interested in their next European vacation than practicing medicine. Scary to think that people might actually go to India for treatment!!!!

    And the small hospital near the scene of the bus crash was an even bigger horror show. The "doctor" there (he said he was "23 and a half" years old) was sewing up people without using anaesthetic, rats came out of the toilets, they gave me a blanket to sleep on (under my girlfriend's bed) that was covered in lice, i got an electric shock taking out my contacts when i accidently touched an instrument sterilizer (the thing had a short and was "live"!)...we booked out of that hospital the next morning and headed straight for the airport to Delhi......

    Look out for those "super-deluxe", menaing they drive faster-than-hell buses...and try to stay clear of Indian hospitals. Anyway that would go all the way to India for one has to be out of their mind (imo!)!!!!

  119. Two really good articles on medical malpractice by Poligraf · · Score: 1
    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  120. the flip side... by garbagedisposal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...whilst millions go begging for health care in India, wealthy foreigners can buy first calss care.

    The same thing is happening in Australia.
    Whiltst many young Australians miss a chance at a tertiary education every year, wealthy foreigners can buy a place in a degree course. Lower standards for fee paying students extend to 'no fail' policies.

    It is scandalous but still the government of the day sails on...

  121. Been there done that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an indian studying in Australia. Couple of years ago, I had to get a root canal done. The local orthodontist was going to charge me AUD$2300 for root canal (that was after a 15% student discount).

    Guess what? the air ticket to india AUD$1200 , cost of root canal in Delhi AUD$350 , meeting family and friends again for a mini vacation PRICELESS.

  122. allowing ordinary doctors do extraordinary things by goon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's probably not well known that people of Indian origin have a predisposition to heart problems. Last year on ABC's, Foreign correspondent, Domonique Schwartz did a story on Dr. Devi Prasad Shetty, Cardiologist/Heart surgeon, of Narayana Hrudayalaya Hospital in Bangalore.

    • ... 3 times more vulnerable than Australians, Americans or Europeans ... every minute on average four Indians have heart attacks ... 2.5 million people need to undergo heart operations and currently only about 50,000 people are undergoing the operation, only 50,000 ...

    In a country with such a distorted wealth distribution, telemedicine allows outlying areas to access to access western trained cardiac specialists to supply top level care that was not previously possible.

    Do not dismiss the expertise of these professionals. The products of top western hospital training in the UK, Australia and US, their expertise tempered by the shere number of operations they perform. The most salient point to consider is ....

    • A government hospital run by the government of India, about 85 to 90 percent of their budgetary allocation goes for salaries. In the Western countries, about 60 to 70 percent of the yearly expense goes for the salaries. In our hospital, it's 20 percent or 22 percent.
    [Foreign Correspondent, ABC, India a big Heart, aired: 18/02/2003]
    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  123. Psychology or sales by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Even though some might want to outsorce psychologies by the means of a tele- or videophone, I still believe that it will be impossible to do so because of human contact that won't be there.

    And the US will need a lot of these since people are really screwd up (don't erceive it as a flamebait, just look here: http://www.anandaanswers.com/pages/naaLanguage.htm l ).

    you'll need to work on your personality though.

    Sales is also something that will stay to some extent, even though it is probably not for geeks.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  124. A psychological glance by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    A lot of crap happens with people because they don't work out their issues and don't follow their purpose.

    To describe it in a simple way, imagine how a patient with a leading archetype of "Victim" comes to a doctor whose main archetype is "Guilt". The probability of something going wrong is much higher when their hidden desires contact. And this is just one example.

    Another thing is finding and following your purpose. If you do it, everything helps you; otherwise some crap might happen in order for you to stop doing what your subconscious does not want you to do.

    In my opinion, certain professions (such as doctors, pilots et al) should put a requirement of not only being able to read a certain amount of books and pass certain exams, but also be a different person who is psychologically healthy and does not have a hidden subconscious agenda.

    This is probably true about all the population. At the same time, certain forces whithin the society REALLY do not want it to happen. F.e., Vultures at Law promote the "Righteous victim fights back (while enriching lawyers)" archetype, leftists inflict Guilt on everyone (think Duncan McLeod), and the government (not as republicans/democrats/green, but as a system) wants everyone to be stupid and controllable.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  125. I second that by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    In 70s (IIRC) the doctor himself was getting about 70% of all medical expenses, now it is just 15%.

    Expensive drugs, a lot of expensive equipment, lawyers et al consume a very high share of the total medical expenses.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  126. Not trade agreements at fault by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Exchange rates are.

    India and China have artificially lowered exchange rate. Thus everything they produce is more competitive outside of their economy.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  127. It won't work by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    The reason is a huge size and population of these countries.

    Unlike the US with the federal "minimum wage" that makes the life approximately the same expensive (on a big scale, certainly), these countries can do it forever.

    I have read an article about China that was telling how Shanghai and the coast are more expensive than some places deep inside the country, and how they start competing on cost with more established areas wooing Western and intraChinese investors.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  128. Agriculture? Probably not. by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Think South America and Australia/New Zealand.

    They have already killed the American fresh-cut flowers industry, and they produce more and more good and cheap wines. Local (I live in Oregon) fruit and berries growers also can't compete on price.

    All the lamb we get here is from NZ. Significant chunk of the farmed fish industry is moving from Norway and Canada to the South america et al.

    When the government revenues fall even more, there won't be money to subsidize the agriculture anymore.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  129. Let them die by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    They live in a different world where high mortality is necessary to offset a very high birth rate.

    This is why they perceive death differently, not ike Westerners.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  130. You're an idiot by Poligraf · · Score: 0

    And your +5, Insightful is made possible only by similar stupid leftists.

    HMO is a desperate (and failing) attempt to control skyrocketing medical costs. Traditional system includes the insurance company and doctors as separate entities with the doctor making any decisions they want and insurance just footing the bill.

    Unfortunately, newer expensive treatments ( http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96859&cid=8283 832 ) and general health degradation in the US caused insurance to experience losses.

    So, they decided to hire their own doctors and put them through the cost-control through the approval of procedures.

    Eventually many other non-HMO companies followed suit. They now need to approve certain medical procedures beforehand, otherwise the doctor is not getting reimbursed.

    Insurance companies can't be in the red ink, htey will just transfer the costs to their customers. This is why even despite all of this crap, the costs for the customers (i.e., these who pay premiums for the healthcare) continue growing. Major cause: expensive drugs and more people requiring them permanently.

    To the contrary to the popular belief, lawsuits are not he culprit of the major cost rise at the medical insurance level, but they greatly affect doctors themselves and their malpractice insurance causing many doctors to drop out of practice in certain litigious areas.

    If you want to "protect people", teach them how to be healthy. Otherwise the general population is just a hostage of these who demand expensive treatment when I (who is pretty healthy and spends a lot of time and money to stay healthy for the time being) foot the bill through my insurance premiums that keep going up.

    P.S. I used to contract at a small healthplan company, so I know some shit.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  131. Won't work by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    2 problems:
    1) Most of the people don't pay for the medical care themselves. Middlemen (insurance companies) do.
    2) Thus, lawyers still will be able to sue someone, and the same certificaions will be required for you to be able to work with these insurance companies.
    3) The culprit is not the expensive healthcare but sick population (problems strt with mental health, many people subconsciously WANT to be sick: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96859&cid=8283 832 )

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The culprit is not the expensive healthcare but sick population (problems strt with mental health, many people subconsciously WANT to be sick"

      At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious, a sick population needs healthcare. Or are you trying to say that the rise in healthcare costs is because a large proportion of the population has suddenly taken to psychosomatic illnesses?

    2. Re:Won't work by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Population that wants to be healthy needs different healthcare.

      This one is just a waste. It is like hiring more Windows 95 admins and wasting tons of money on third party tools instead of upgrading to a better, more stable and reliable OS (where OS is the population).

      And the population is not suddenly taken to the psychosomatic illnesses, it was going for ages, but the scale had gone up.

      Also, it is rising amount of these who are "prescription addict", i.e. whose survival depends on eating tons of drugs. It can easily be 10-15 hundred each friggin' month (according to what I read in Oregonian describing the existing crisis).

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  132. Not outsorcing, but storing by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    At a time when developed countries pay a lot of money to the underdeveloped ones to store nuclear waste there, they can also pay some money to store radioactive lawyer waste in a reliable containers! ;-)

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  133. chasing tennis balls for food money by crazyhorse44 · · Score: 1

    better chasing tennis balls for food money...

    than not chasing tennis balls for no food money.

    although you are using this as an example of the oppressive Hindu caste system... in reality this family may have just wanted to help some kids out and let them do some chores around the house/court/etc. if they were really being cheap/evil I'm sure they would have let the girl pick up her own balls and let all the poor children starve.

    --
    . SLASHDOT: Home of the vicious nerd.
  134. Not that surprising by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Not that surprising - the state of the art in joint replacement is at the same point it was two decades ago - there's nothing better in the labs than there is in people's kneecaps. It's a case of commercial development halting and marketing taking over, and people relying on the currency of their patents so they don't ever have to do any development ever again.

  135. Its not HMOs and Insurance... by LinuxMacWin · · Score: 1

    Sorry I am probably too late for someone to see my comments. Anyway...

    People are talking about HMOs and Insurance saving money and also talking about liability issues. Yet, that is one side but the solution there is easy. If the insurance companies can get comfortable with the model, they would use it because the overall costs (medical expenses + liability costs) will be lower. I do not think the jury will say Insurance did a wrong thing by sending someone to India because most of the other cases worked.

    However, I feel that a significant pressure will come from un-insureds. My newborn was in ICU for just over a week and hospital billed about $50K. The insurance paid $12K. Even that is too high, but if I was uninsured the hospital would have insisted on $50K. Now this worked out because I am insured and the deductible is low. How about the uninsureds? As you know, there are lots and lots of them in this economy. If someone needs help which costs $10K and the hospital asks them for $50-$100K because they are not insured, what would they do? Well they are not going to think about where it is done, just that there is someone available to help them for the price they can pay.

    I am not saying the un-insured are causing the change, but a significant part will be driven by them. If you think farther, isn't this how Linux started...keeping the rhetoric of open source aside for a minute.

  136. Likely... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    The equipment cost so much because that is what the market will bear. Keep in mind that likely a company which manufactures MRI machines will only sell them to hospitals, maybe a few clinics. There are only so many of those around, so they set their prices accordingly. Furthermore, they jack up the prices to the point where these places will still buy them, but no further.

    Think about something like automobiles - in essence, they are all the same, using technology that is largely 100 years old. They are all built using assembly lines, with the same materials and processes. Some may have doodads here and there (ooh - shiny!), but overall every car is identical.

    Now - why do some cars cost $40,000, and others cost $10,000? Because the market (nee sheep consumers) perceives an artificial "value" in the more expensive vehicle over the cheaper model. It isn't too expensive (well, it is for me - but I am talking about those whom it is marketed toward) for the consumer to buy - but if it was any more (say, $60,000) - the market would shift away from that model to another, less expensive (but still "valuable") vehicle.

    Another example are "enterprise class" computers. Overall, these computers use the same technology and processes as a typical consumer machine. Some hardware is special (ie, Fibre Channel, clustered disk arrays, etc) - but even it still uses the same processes and technology to build it. However, since it isn't marketed to consumers, it is priced accordingly. Indeed, many times it is priced at outlandish amounts. Sometimes, even the lowly components are priced outrageously (like a 9 gig SCSI drive running at 15K RPM going for $300.00 - when you could pick up the same thing for much less elsewhere). Lock-in on a per-vendor basis viea service contracts abounds - even so, many businesses think nothing of the crazy markup on these items, because they are priced for businesses, and not a penny more or less!

    The true value of an item is generally perceived after it has hit the secondhand/used market - especially if it is being sold as "new surplus". It won't sell for the amount it used to sell for, generally it will sell for much, much less - but usually, it is selling for what it is truely worth, and what it should have been selling for originally. However, because things are priced for what the market will bear, most things (especially in niche markets like MRI machines for hospitals) sell for much more - even if the technology and manufacturing processes are matured to the point where they should be selling for less.

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  137. Yep by Poligraf · · Score: 1

    Read it more carefully. I state that this insurance greatly affects YOUR practice as a doctor, but it is change when calculating the health insurance premiums for insured individually and through work.

    Here are two articles, you can find them here:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=96895&cid=82 89 149

    As for capping the damages, IIRC, capped are not the actual damages, but "pain and suffering" ones. I'd also have eliminated "punitive damages" in this field thus eliminating most outrageous awards (it is especially bad because most awards are just absorbed by insurance that distributes them among all practitioners - good and bad).

    And yes, you can't have both ability to sue for unlimited damages and ability have low malpractice insurance. The only way to improve the situation is to make cheaper lawyers. For now it seems to be impossible.

    --
    Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    1. Re:Yep by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I'd also have eliminated "punitive damages" in this field thus eliminating most outrageous awards

      Punitive damages are already generally capped under common law.

    2. Re:Yep by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Haven't heard about it; IIRC, the punitive damages against hospitals or nursing homes occasionally happen to reach into dosens of millions.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    3. Re:Yep by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Those are the numbers that the jury comes up with; the judge generally knocks them down. Generally the formula is punitive damages have to be a single digit multiplier of compensatory or restitutionary damages. I can't remember the exact case that established it, but I can look it up if you're seriously interested.

    4. Re:Yep by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      It depends on the judge; some are not willing to reduce it TOO much.

      So, many multi-million judgements still stand.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    5. Re:Yep by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Those who don't get appealed. A lot of multi-million dollar judgments DO stand, but for some things a few million dollars really is fair damages.

    6. Re:Yep by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      Even these who get appealed. You can't always reduce it even if it makes it to the Supreme Court.

      I don't believe in punitive damages altogether. This concept is outdated, and in the modern economy where everything is covered by insurance is just an additional way of the public paying to some sucker and his greedy lawyer.

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
    7. Re:Yep by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Everything ISN'T covered by insurance. And without punitive damages you get situations like Ford's Pinto, where the company knew the car was defective, found that it would take $11 to fix this flaw, but calculated that it was cheaper to just let people die and then pay damages. Without punitive damages companies can do this all the time.

    8. Re:Yep by Poligraf · · Score: 1

      >And without punitive damages you get situations like Ford's Pinto, where the company knew the car was defective, found that it would take $11 to fix this flaw, but calculated that it was cheaper to just let people die and then pay damages. Without punitive damages companies can do this all the time.

      This is what your lawyer friends are telling ya?

      This is utter BS (or, more precisely, LS) that the Vultures at Law imprint into the brains of Americans. The reason for that being not more than a BS is that the historical time has changed. You did not have such an importance of PR then, and "defective products" was not a common speak. Any similar disaster now leads to a sales decline (and I don't even mention that sometimes the problem is not with a car, as, f.e., in "Ford-Firestone debacle"; the roblems lies with degenerates who use the products).

      As for punitive damages, read this research: http://www.triallawyersinc.com/html/part01.html

      The entire industry that squanders $200 bln (conservative estimate) is built on views similar to yours!

      --
      Tigers respect lions, elephants and hippos. Maggots respect no one. (C) S. Dovlatov
  138. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by afidel · · Score: 1

    You've never heard of plasma centers????

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  139. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice

  140. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let's see, here: his evidence is stuff he's supposedly read; your evidence is stuff you've supposedly heard (several times, no less). I'd say you're both idiots!

  141. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Oh My God. You've never seen an article on the news or in a respectable newspaper about people paying to adopt newborn babies? You're totally unaware that there is a whole industry based around this practice in the US? Or that surrogacy is big business too?

    Did you even bother to click the Google link that I provided and investigate some of the links supplied on that page for yourself if you were so skeptical of what I had to say? I provided the means for you to verify what I said but you decided to skip that, dismiss my contribution as hearsay and call me an idiot.

    Wow. And they say that most AC posts are full of rubbish.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  142. Props for the Snow Crash ref by devphil · · Score: 1


    If I only knew what mad props were, I'd give you some.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  143. Surprise! Already happening. by devphil · · Score: 1
    There is no way in hell that any HMO or insurance company should ever be allowed to tell a patient "we're gonna fly you half way around the world for this surgery".

    Why not?

    You've ranted for two paragraphs, but you haven't given me any objective reasons.

    The salt water of the Dead Sea, combined with the thicker atmosphere (prevents ultraviolet rays from actually reaching the earth's surface), is so effective against psoriasis that some European countries' health plans pay patients to fly to Israel, rather than use medications at home.[*] In this case it's a natural geographic feature of the world doing the healing instead of trained doctors, but the idea -- and the economics -- of moving patients to a more effective, more economical location are well set in the world of Western medicine.

    [*] Bruce Feiler, ISBN 0-380-80731-9, odd travel writer. This fact struck me as so interesting that I hunted through the bookcases to find the reference.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  144. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by srichand · · Score: 1

    Not exactly,
    I'am an indian, i live in bangalore. My dad's a doctor, more specifically, a dermatologist.
    When i told him, that i would do a BE(equivalent of BS) in CS, he was aghast! He couldn't believe, that i didn't want to be a doctor.
    And, as regards health care in india, I know for a fact, that more doctors are actually interested in health care, than money. Quite a few of them go atleast once a week, for about 15 hours to a charity hospital, and treat patients there for free, absolutely free, yes, even stuff like Bypass surgeries are free.
    Doctors in india are amongst the most highly respected people around, more respected than those with a lot of money.

  145. How outsourcing helps by Nik4 · · Score: 1

    Perils of Outsourcing The article is short and lucid....just read it! The effect on U.S. living standards is the same as what would happen if a cost-reducing technology in software production occurred. Living standards rise either way.

  146. Think of it this way... by Jonathan+Platt · · Score: 1

    This shows that Indians (that doesn't sound right) really want to work. It is a shame but most of the western world have gottern lazy. They want a free ride and use things like trade unions and the fickle government system to do this.

    I think we need less unemployment benifits, make people value having a good job again, and stop demanding more. I just keep thinking back to the story on the most over paid jobs, and can't belive we have let it come to this.

    --


    VENI, VIDI, VICI, DIXI
  147. I know someone who did that ... by kbahey · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who lives in Saudi Arabia, but is not a citizen (so he does not have free health insurance there). His employer only covers local health for a certain number of dependants (and the guy's father is not among them)

    His father needed heart surgery, so they went to India (Madras, now Chennai), and had the surgery done for a fraction of the cost of what it have been if they did it in Saudi Arabia, even after you factor in the air fare and the hotel costs.

    He praises the Indian doctors for being knowledgable.

    As a side note, in third world countries, it is not a bad doctor that would you in trouble, it is often the post operative care, infection, ...etc. that can be fatal.

  148. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by tarunthegreat · · Score: 1

    So the next time a tourist comes to USA, he should help out a homeless person? I mean I guess he should also 'spread his wealth' to help your country right?

  149. Re:Lack of quality? or more of it! by tarunthegreat · · Score: 1

    Well being an Indian, I disagree with u - there are just so many more Asians than Europeans/Americans, so the probablities are in our favour...

    I have a different theory. I think Indians and Chinese ppl are better than Americans at Math/Science becoz they use the frikking metric system.

    If u ask an American what the boiling/freezing poitn of water is, a non-science student is probably likely to tell u to go ask the slit-eyed yellow skinned kid in his/her science class. Ask the slit-eyed yellow-skinned kid and s/he will instantly respond with 0 and 100 degrees Celcius insted frickin' 32 and 252?? deg fahreinheit.

    Plus 1 km = 1000 m = 1000,000 mm

    instead of 3 ft to yard or something.... Just a personal theory.

  150. Free trade zone for medicine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we need is a free trade zone for medicine. Kind of like a duty-free shop. Where foreign doctors can come and do their stuff and the patients dont need to travel.

  151. Welcome Our Robot Overlords! by Vagary · · Score: 1

    Why do you need to drive anywhere if the robots will go there and do whatever it is for you?

    Of course the real question is: will they be able to outsource the building and maintenance of our robot overlords?

    1. Re:Welcome Our Robot Overlords! by jbplou · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they outsource our robot overlord maintenance, outsource quality in experience as been quite poor, so we will be able to overthrow them.

  152. Re:it would definitely lower costs. by Izmunuti · · Score: 1

    "So... how do we plan for this? Any creative ideas out there?"

    1) Get up to your eyeballs in debt. The hyperinflation and other fun stuff that will happen when the US gets its costs adjusted will wipe it all out and you'll be sitting pretty. Just think how small that $2500/month mortgage will seem when Big Macs cost $800!

    2) Invest in barrels. These will be THE hot fashion item after the crash. Every newly bankrupted, homeless, jobless person who's lost even the clothes off their back will need one.

    3) Keep in shape. To distract attention from the $800 Big Macs, there are likely to be a series of pointless wars. This could make the military one of the few places that's hiring.

    4) Keep your membership up to date in radical organizations. Radicals tend to take over during times of disruptions. It's likelty to be neo-fascists or neo-communists; probably neo-fascists are more likely in the US. You want to be on the winning side and avoid any troublesome pogroms or purges so make sure the likely Supreme-Leader doesn't have you on his shit list.

    Iz

  153. everytime an american has a beef with India.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    he goes yelling 'CASTE'!!

    sigh. wake up people. how many of you have been ever out of your own backyard?

    India made caste system illegal as soon as it got independence. About the time when you were lynching blacks with abandon.

    And oh, the other day I heard on radio about a jury sternly reprimanding a police officer that he should not be treating blacks like animals.

    Says something about the caste system in america, dont you think?

    Fase it, you have castes too - I think you guys call the different ones by names such as whites, blacks (ni**ers, is another name I heard?), spics, gooks, chinks, curries, patels, gandhis, injuns.. every single race that came to this country has been given an official caste name by you guys.

    So, POT, stop calling the kettle black. atleast the kettle is trying to wash itself. OKAY??

  154. Nightmare come true? by TCBandersnatch · · Score: 1

    Although the medical expertise and technology in India is not bad, there are some risks worth considering:

    1. If a blood transfusion is required, be sure to consider autologous blood donation. India has reportedly taken steps to improve the quality of the blood supply however, it still draws on a population rampant with HIV, hepatitis, malaria, and various other blood born diseases. Remember, this is still a third world country.
    2. Infection rates. They're much higher than in the west. Check out this recent bit of medical news:
    3. Think about recovery. With a heavily taxed immune system, do you really want to face food and water born pests that make the most fit visitor to Mumbai extremely ill? On a recent trip, 5 out of 7 of my traveling companions fell ill. Yes we all drank bottled water (and yes we inspected the caps).

    The saw bones may be cheaper over there but when your hide is on the line, don't forget to factor in the other risk factors.

  155. hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    reservations.. ah yes.

    like that affirmative action thing you guys have got going? Or the money talks routine?
    >> Not in my life would I trust my life with an Indian doctor. No sir.

    I guess the rest of the world shoudl say that of american black docs then?

    1. Re:hmm.. by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm aside, if you are a product of anything but pure merit (no matter how so) your professional capabilities are doubted. This is natural. Yes, I would doubt a black doctor who has not gotten through the proper channels, and I do not see anything wrong in that simply because am being careful. Reservation for anything thats not meritorious is a bad thing, IMHO.

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
  156. I already go to Canada... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    I travel to Canada a lot, often for weeks at a time. The last few years, I've gotten all my medical "maintenance" taken care of up there, because it's so much cheaper. An optometrist in southern CA costs over $100. Even in "expensive" Vancouver, it's $60 Canadian, or $45 US -- less than half the price. So I have a Canadian optometrist, dentist, chiropractor, and sports therapist. I'm thinking about LASIK, and I'd definately get that done up there too.

    Similarly, a lot of Americans get stuff done in Mexico, particularly dentistry and plastic surgery. All we hear about are the wacky cancer treatments, but the market for the mundane stuff is many times bigger.

    Note to all you contractors and self-employed people out there -- while the IRS lets you deduct all your medical expenses now, you still have to spend it first. And spending less is still spending less, tax deduction or no...

  157. Even accepting your history... by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    Except for gun powder those are ancient history and gun powder is nowhere nearly as current as the triode, computer, transitor and integrated circuit -- none of which even came from the West's elite institutions -- but from the US's agricultural cultures. Nothing comparable to those inventions has come out of anywhere in Asia during the time people have been claiming Asians are the new technical elites. Good businessmen, perhaps even great businessmen yes... but no invention of comparable magnitude.

    1. Re:Even accepting your history... by Baldrson · · Score: 1
      I should clarify that the transistor and triode were supposedly the responsibility of the elite institutions of Yale and Bell Labs respectively, but the Iowa parson's son who invented the triode was nearly kicked out of Yale for his experimentation and John Bardeen (raised and educated in Madison Wisconsin a stone's throw from where Seymour Cray had his farm) explicitly claimed that the transistor was invented against orders from Bell Labs management.

      Of the two stories, Yale is the closest one comes to an elite institution that facilitated the natural inclinations of one of its students to do something great. That Yale, early 20th century Yale, was not the Yale of today by any stretch of the imagination. But the guys from the bread basket just kept at it time after time over decades.

  158. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by hydrofilic · · Score: 0

    My CEO said he expects me to give my heart and soul for the company. Given that he is Indian, i am begining to wonder about what he really meant.

  159. Faded fables and creaky careers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but it *is* obvious that saying "just get a new career in accounting/law/ marketing/whatever!" is naive because there is no strictly "safe" field to start with, and never will be."

    Slashdot poster. Oh wait! too late. :)

    Anyway the "retrain '
    em" argument has a problem. The NIMBY problem. Once you've trained the 5.3 Million unemployed in a particular field. Then you have the "I do it for the love" in the respective fields complaining about all the "just doing it for the money" saturating the market, and driving formerly "dot com" salaries down.

    Then there's the "insourcing" aka HB-1's were if your job isn't going out? It's being filled by imported "I do it for the love of low wages" labour.

    Also there's the "twins" of "gott'em by the balls, work to death" and "meet your replacement, mr automated checkout line"

    Plus more can be done "were there's a will, there's a way". Build a home? Buy a modular "made in china" home. fresh off the container ship.

    Quite frankly now's the worst time to be labour.

  160. No way...Health accounts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would recommend neither a socialist solution, neither the present one. Health accounts(1) (minus some of the stupid restrictions) couple with backup health insurance would work. Expose all medical goods and services to market forces, with the framework of laws to prevent the most serious abuse. The idea is that most of the problems will disappear when people control the outcome of their own health.

    (1) Think of it as a 401K for your medical needs.

  161. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    Sure... If you consider getting a slice of pizza or a couple cookies after you give blood "selling for personal profit..." Have you ever donated blood?

    --
    -Rich
  162. similar thing by Tellarin · · Score: 1


    a similar thing is happening in Brazil, where there are also state-of-the-art facilities and good doctors for several kinds of transplants and surgerys

    it happens specially with people from middle east, rich people that usually went to the US for that kind of thing, but whom in the current situation don't want to go there

    some go to europe, but most people don't like the kind of "doctors" in europe, the kind that is too profesional, to distant from the pacient.

    they prefer "warmer" doctors, so Brazil gets to be the choice.

  163. Yeah sure. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    So you prefer to live in pain under perhaps a life threatening condition while you wait up to 18 months for your operation in the NHS.

    You prefer that to a 12 hour flight and ac ouple of weeks at most in decent medical facilities.

    Riiiigth.

    And about the accents, wisen up boy, if I, who is not a natiove English speaker, can understand Indian accents, I am sure you can. Hell, I can understand now yordie, scottish, cornish and even some cockney accents.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Yeah sure. by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Well, if I was British, I'd be looking into private hospitals just like I do in the US.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  164. Typical glass half empty bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Many Mexican industries just died because they were not protected against the more competitive counterpart in the US and Canada. Or the unfairly subsidized ones (agriculture).

    Of course you guys ignore that aspect of NAFTA and only whine about "job losses" while during most of NAFTA existence your unemployment rate has been the lowest for generations.

    Pure misinformation and under the hoods xenophobia.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  165. Ah the trolls, one ought to love them. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    India was not Independent 60 years ago.

    60 years after Independence half the US was still relying on slave labour to generate wealth.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  166. India? Think Thailand instead by mikelambert70 · · Score: 1

    I would rather go to Thailand simply because of better hygiene, and prices for medical procedures are similar.

    I have used medical facilities in both countries, both expensive and inexpensive ones, and would never ever go to surgery in India. There's simply a total hygiene gap between India and Thailand, to the advantage of the latter.

    It starts with the food, in India it is very easy to get serious health problems from food and water, whereas both food and water are very safe in Thailand, and ends with wiping your ass, with many Indians still using their hand, whereas Thais use a bidet shower.

    There are many hospitals in Bangkok alone catering for foreigners. Most telling is that these hospitals do booming business with Indians, too. No Thai would ever even dream of going to India for health care!

    Lack of hygiene in outpatient care can be an annoyment at best, but can kill you at worst, with surgery the risks are thousand-fold.

  167. Freeloaders? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Those people are paying taxes (sales tax or whatever you call it) and contribute to the economy keeping full industries alive. If they can't pay for their own healtcare is due to US policies that close the eyes to the reality of migrant workers.

    I wish you would get your unstated wish and tomorrow all the "freeloaders" would vanish from the US. The eonomic collapse of the South of the US would be an admirable spectacle.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  168. Earwax removal and other small procedures by mikelambert70 · · Score: 1

    You can remove the earwax very easily yourself, either with a special pump or just using a large plastic syringe (without needle ;-). With body temperature water you don't even necessarily need any chemical to soften the ear wax. Paying somebody money to do this is like paying somebody to wipe your ass.

    Similarly, if your toenail is not extremely, hideously badly ingrown, you can cut it or file it yourself. Just avoid using shoes afterwards to avoid infection stemming from poor ventilation. Calamine lotion works wonders with toes, and actually any small cuts and bruises, especially in difficult humid places (only for external use).

    It's not magic what doctors do to your body in small procedures like these, so sometimes a little hacking spirit goes a long way, both for your dollars and your knowledge.

    But, if you fck it up, remember that fixing your work can cost more than have a professional to do it in the first place..just use some common sense and caution and you'll be fine (and no, you can't sue me if you fck up anyway).

  169. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The US middle class is far too rich and far too wasteful.

    SUVx, obesity are just signs that US workers have enough range of manouvre to lower their salaries without their level of life diminishing too much.

    That will make you competitive again, simply you have to be more rational about your expenses in order to be able to accept lower salaries.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  170. Your parochialism is so immense... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... that iw ill not make any further comments about it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  171. Rubish. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    My mother in law did just that: hip replacement.

    She was 80 years old at the time.

    Of course YMMV, but is not an impossibility.

    Funnily enough we later learned that one world authority on hip replacement actually lives in the thirld world country where she was living.

    Oh well, it was money well spent anyway.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  172. Re:oh great, first they outsource my job, then thi by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have donated blood. But I live in a country where such donations are 100 percent altruistic. That's not the case in the US, however.

    You may not have been paid for your donation, or you might not be aware that some donations are paid for, but it does happen in the US. At least one other person who replied to my original post has had direct experience of paid donations.

    Just because you haven't experienced something first hand, it doesn't mean that it doesn't happen.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  173. In a way, it's happening right now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a personal note, my dad had two wisdom teeth crack on him recently. He priced out the local medical cost to $7,000. Then he priced the cost in India as $500, and a round trip plane ticket for $1200. He flew out last week.