Slashdot Mirror


Smarter Children Through Food Supplements

An anonymous reader writes "Baby rats (mmm...baby rats) fed a little extra choline in utero popped out with brain cells dramatically bigger and faster than pups who didn't receive the supplement. Duke University researchers say the implications are profound for humans and the future of learning."

409 comments

  1. Carefull..... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Careful...... It should also be noted that in neurons in the hippocampus (and elsewhere), when the threshold for firing is decreased, the propensity for epileptiform discharges increases. The authors of the study claim that the neurons are bigger and fire more easily. I suppose that the ease of firing could simply be related to simple cable theory as predicted by Hodgkin and Huxley, but their explanation of increased dendritic count could also explain it nicely. However, other explanations could also be correct such as increased or upregulated glutamatergic channel count or increased receptor count.

    researchers say the implications are profound for humans and the future of learning

    At any rate, I regardless of the actual model, these sorts of public proclamations are troublesome as there are now going to be thousands upon thousands that will go out and start purchasing choline supplements just like their mass purchasing of melatonin (extracted from bovine pineal gland commonly, prion diseases anyone?), or ephedra (cardiac arrest anyone?), Aristolochia fangchi (kidney damage or cancer anyone?), shark cartilage (simply a lighter wallet anyone?), or any other unproven (not a troll, I am a scientist folks, so I want proof) supplement.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Carefull..... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Funny



      Oh, by the way......all of what I said above and.......First post. :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Carefull..... by catbutt · · Score: 1

      Oh well, my kid'll be smarter than yours! So where can I get the stuff?

    3. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      yep- totally agree, troublesome indeed. Also, there are plenty of cases where rat (or mouse) studies don't accurately predict human outcome.

      imagine the possibilities: "chlorine supplements", while labeled correctly, would still make a fortune.

    4. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Offtopic? No see thats funny because he really did have first post that and hes like a real science dude who makes fun of us on slashdot and all.
      MOD PARENT FUNNY

    5. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      or ephedra (cardiac arrest anyone?),

      Careful, Ephedra works exactly the way it's supposed too(As a bronchial dialator and constricting agent). The people that experience negative effects either abuse it(read: take TOO MUCH) or shouldn't be taking it due to a prior condition. Yes, I take ephedra, and have on and off in cycles for 5+ years(now am 24). Do your own due dillgence and see what works for your body.

      I can make the smae statment about aspirin: give 10000mg to an 80 yr old with low blood pressure and see what happens....


      -k

    6. Re:Carefull..... by after · · Score: 2, Funny

      How the heck did you write that fast enough to have legible grammar _and_ to make a first post?

      you must be a subscriber... right? (10 minutes in advance)

    7. Re:Carefull..... by BWJones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can make the smae statment about aspirin: give 10000mg to an 80 yr old with low blood pressure and see what happens....

      So, you have just made the golden argument against dietary supplements and herbal remedies. Namely, there is no control over the industry so one really does not know what they are getting. Am I getting 50mg of the "active ingredient" or am I getting 500mg? There is no way of knowing because there are no controls on the manufacture and no standards that they follow. One manufacturer may provide next to nothing in the pills while another may provide a whopping dose, so how do you know?

      By the way, 10000mg of aspirin would likely give anybody problems, not just an 80 year old with low blood pressure. The low blood pressure could actually help out as aspirin is an anticoagulant. So, if one had high blood pressure, there may be a higher incidence of hemorrhage or hemorrhagic stroke with high dosages of aspirin. More likely however for most folks would be an upset stomach, fever and possibly ulcerations and bleeding of the stomach and intestine if you don't puke it all up first.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    8. Re:Carefull..... by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 2, Interesting
      uninhibits the cell division process in the memory centers of the brain.

      Hmmm... doesn't that sound like potential brain cancer?
    9. Re:Carefull..... by krumms · · Score: 1

      From what little I can understand of your post, it sounds very insightful.

    10. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a few suppliment companies that follow FDA guidlines in their manufacturing. It just requires a bit of research.

    11. Re:Carefull..... by yppiz · · Score: 5, Interesting
      If someone doesn't mod the parent as funny, I'm going to weep neuronal growth factor (NGF).

      More on topic, changing one parameter of complex system that is possibly well tuned for what it does, but not well tuned for parameter changes, may result in a system that is far less efficient or even completely broken.

      Imagine if you magically made it possible for signals to travel on ethernet faster than routers could process them. You might see an increase in congestion or in misrouted packets. This in turn could melt down the network, or at least make it impossible for anyone to use it.

      I am not trying to say that this is what the researchers have proposed. I'm just pointing out that making one thing better can put stress on or even break the entire system.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    12. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate you. I had forgotten the details of the image of the gaping anus.

    13. Re:Carefull..... by pcmills · · Score: 1

      Probably Author/submitter.

      --
      Ask Slashdot - google for stupid people.
    14. Re:Carefull..... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, so you find some third-world country that is desperate for smarter people and let them guinea-pig it for us. Then, if it works, outsource all your workers to a new facility in that country and hire all the smart kids, patent the hell out of it, and then upcharge parents all over the world who want smarter babies. On the other hand, if it simply produces thousands of highly intelligent epileptics with Parkinson's Disease and giant forehead tumors, deny any involvement whatsoever until forced to confess, and then explain that the drug tested was really just a new AIDS cocktail. Isn't that how the pharmaceutical industry operates anyway?

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:Carefull..... by JanneM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IANANSBIPTBOATL (I Am Not A NeuroScientist, But I Pretend To Be One At The Lab), but another possible risk I see is regarding neuronal damage from overexposure to signal substances. You already see this in the Hippocampus during high-stress events, when the inhibitory loop downregulating the Amygdala gives up and allows flooding the Hippocampus with neurotransmitters. This damages, even kills, cells in this area (and is likely to be part of the reason you get memory lapses around traumatic events). With bigger, faster cells with more connections, I would guess the activation threshold for damaging levels of the signal substance (acetyl cholin?) will be substantially lower.

      So, tongue.in-cheek, you may get people able to learn very fast, but you better not upset them, or they will forget all recent experiences.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    16. Re:Carefull..... by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The sad thing is much of the dietary recommendations by various OFFICIAL/GOV bodies don't really have much scientific backing either.

      All that worry about high cholesterol foods being bad for blood cholesterol. If dietary cholesterol really affected bloodstream, why not eat foods with high good cholesterol (HDL) then? Doesn't work that way? So why should it work the way they suggest?

      Not too long ago they were saying eggs were bad for you (high cholesterol) then, eggs were ok. then now eggs are good. Fortunately my mom figured eggs and fish were good (amongst other things).

      And there are recent studies that have shown that a high protein diet (even with significant fat content) is ok for blood cholesterol and can even reduce obesity.

      You get the stupid diet quacks saying, "So we were right after all, weight loss is due to calorie reduction, not because of protein metabolism, low calorie carbo diets work too! etc" in response to studies showing that people eat less on high protein diets because they feel more satisfied. Doh - what do they want, people to be miserable and feel like they are starving on their "recommended" stupid low calorie high carbo diets?

      They've made so many people's lives miserable with their diet recommendations.

      As for ephedra, if they ban that they might as well ban paracetamol too - paracetamol is rather dangerous stuff for the rather little benefit it does (I can deal with the mild pain, aches and fever, it does hardly anything for the major stuff)- overdosing is easy and the consequences are serious/fatal.

      --
    17. Re:Carefull..... by whitespacedout · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On a related note, I have a friend who got into prenatal sound therapy for her two kids during gestation. They are way more hyperactive and brighter than their peers. Sure, it'd be easier for her if they both had prefrontal lobotomies, but they are really good, well-balanced kids otherwise. She's convinced the sound therapy made a great difference, and there is a lot of evidence due to a bunch of russian studies on the benefits of this. I'll definitely be going for the therapy too when it's time for me to spawn.

    18. Re:Carefull..... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --See this movie reference for my take on it all:

      http://imdb.com/title/tt0149261/

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    19. Re:Carefull..... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Careful, Ephedra works exactly the way it's supposed too

      True, though interestingly enough, Ephedra, discovered by the Chinese, is not used by them for weightloss. Ephedra (ma huang)can be indicated in Traditional Chinese Medicine for dealing with cold and flu issues, but it's obviously intended for very short term use.

      Honestly, TCM doctors are horrified by people using Ephedra for weightloss.

    20. Re:Carefull..... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 4, Informative

      melatonin (extracted from bovine pineal gland commonly, prion diseases anyone?)

      Search for "non-bovine melatonin" in google. One large supplement company also makes a melatonin that says its suitable for vegetarians, an indication to me that its derived from non-animal sources.

      ephedra (cardiac arrest anyone?)

      Ephedra was incidentally discovered by the Chinese, its indicated for colds and flu in Traditional Chinese Medicine, and is obviously meant for short term use. TCM doctors are actually horrified by the idea of using Ephedra (ma huang) for weightloss.

      Aristolochia fangchi (kidney damage or cancer anyone?)

      According to this article AF was put into weightloss pills by mistake, due to the fact that the chinese name is similar to another herb. It is not indicated for anything.

      shark cartilage (simply a lighter wallet anyone?)
      Shark cartilage has indeed been rejected as a possible treatment for cancer.

      these sorts of public proclamations are troublesome... any other unproven (not a troll, I am a scientist folks, so I want proof)

      Though not juxtaposed, the lines above are odd next to each other, after all, this was not a random proclamation, this was indeed a scientific study, and I'm sure more will follow. You had some good examples, but they could be fairly easily explained (you missed one or two which are much uglier. :-)

      But even then, I think that the modern record on supplements/herbs is very good. The injuries caused by supplements pales in comparison to those caused by derived pharmaceuticals, which are pretty strictly regulated.

    21. Re:Carefull..... by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but I for one welcome our new Uber-Rat overlords...

    22. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So where can I get the stuff?

      Chlorine? Why, you're soaking in it!

    23. Re:Carefull..... by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      I welcome our new super intelligent rat overlords.

      - Willard

    24. Re:Carefull..... by whovian · · Score: 1

      So, you have just made the golden argument against dietary supplements and herbal remedies. Namely, there is no control over the industry so one really does not know what they are getting

      FYI, you can find $ubstitute$ that are available in FDA-approved OTC medication$. Products containing ephedrine, not ephedra, can be used successfully if you know what you are doing and don't have any indications that advise against using it in the first place.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    25. Re:Carefull..... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      Inotherwords...

      "The gene pool is stagnant, and I am the minister of chlorine!" -Postal Dude

      Sorry...someone HAD to say it at some point or another.

    26. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have used ephedra for colds in the past, it was the best thing i ever took for a cold. the day I took the normal weight loss dose, for a cold, it was always gone that day. Thats why the govt banned ephedra, so we cant get over the super cold they will spread when they try to dictatorize the USA!!!! BASTARDS! :)

    27. Re:Carefull..... by Pierre · · Score: 3, Funny

      I feel the same way about motor oil. That's why I only drink it occasionally

    28. Re:Carefull..... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh, by the way......all of what I said above and.......First post. :-)

      Well, somebody's been taking his choline supplements today....

    29. Re:Carefull..... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      Ephedra in it's lesser/other form of Pseudoephedrine HCL makes a very good over-the-counter decongestant.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    30. Re:Carefull..... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      The process by which the brain 'expands', or adds layers etc. is one where it seems to leverage an otherwise disparate group of needs and abilities.

      We may be driven to consume these and other supplements so that another rung can be added to the ladder of development, and while there may be risks and side effects to the next 10 or 20 generations, this may well be the price to pay for the next big step in human evolution.

    31. Re:Carefull..... by caston · · Score: 0
      As well as a common precursor to methamphetamine.

      --
      Beings aspergers AND pulling chicks... I enjoy the challenge!
    32. Re:Carefull..... by index72 · · Score: 1

      Proof, go to www.prestigepublishing.com and order one years backorder of newsletters and start reading. And DON'T be a baby. Someone as obviously intelligent as you can afford a measly $29.95 and spend a few minutes reading.

    33. Re:Carefull..... by witort · · Score: 1



      sounds like someone's been taking his choline!

    34. Re:Carefull..... by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Even if we did end up with drastically smarter children, the education system as it is now wouldn't do them a hell of a lot of good.

      It doesn't even address the needs of the faster and slower students as it is now.

    35. Re:Carefull..... by goodviking · · Score: 1

      There's a great book covering the current state of nutritional research from the Harvard School of Public Health: Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy. It's about $15 US, and worth every penny.

    36. Re:Carefull..... by WNight · · Score: 1

      Don't have a television. Seriously. It's a time waster that will keep them from getting into things like lego or whatever, and much of the programming on will reach out and lobotomize them.

      Hell, even if they simply sit on the net for hours a day, at least it forces them to read, and games are interactive. Better than the idiot box.

    37. Re:Carefull..... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      That's the damning thing - the various authorities have been spreading lies like the USDA food pyramid for years and significantly contributing to ruining the health of millions.

      And there have been minimal or no apologies, just defensive posturing, rationalization and justification etc.

      Sorry for the rant but it's almost criminal what has happened/is happening.

      --
    38. Re:Carefull..... by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At any rate, I regardless of the actual model, these sorts of public proclamations are troublesome as there are now going to be thousands upon thousands that will go out and start purchasing choline supplements just like their mass purchasing of melatonin (extracted from bovine pineal gland commonly, prion diseases anyone?), or ephedra (cardiac arrest anyone?), Aristolochia fangchi (kidney damage or cancer anyone?), shark cartilage (simply a lighter wallet anyone?), or any other unproven (not a troll, I am a scientist folks, so I want proof) supplement.

      What's disturbing here is that while they've documented the physiological effects on the rat's brains, they didn't do any follow-up studies as to how this actually effected the rat's capacity to learn, or any of the effects on the rat's behavior.

      So now we know that chlorine will alter the development of the rat's brains, but we don't know if the effects of the change are good, bad or indifferent.

    39. Re:Carefull..... by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they keep changing that damn food pyramid all the time.

      Here's MY pyramid. Haven't changed it in over 45 years: Top to bottom(somebody else can draw the pyramid)

      hamburger(maybe with some lettuce, tomato(e), etc.)
      liver suasage
      Cheerios
      Hostess cupcakes(with skim milk, of course)

      --
      What?
    40. Re:Carefull..... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used higher than recomended doses of ephedra for colds as well, if I absolutly had to make it to school. My heart is, and was in great condition, so I wasn't too scared about side effects. The end result was great - most of the cold symptoms would be masked, and the ephedra gave enough of a mood and energy boost that I wouldn't mind being sick at school at all. As far as I know, no one ever even realised I was sick during the times I used it. I wouldn't go as far as to suggest anyone else try that method (and in the US you don't legally have the right to decide for yourself anymore), but I loved it.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    41. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crap, there actually was a real tinfins movie?

    42. Re:Carefull..... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      One thing that's kind of cool about this is that the grosser aspects are cheap enough that anyone suffieciently motivated could set themselves up to test this themselves. It actually sounds like it could make a pretty cool experiment for high school science fairs.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    43. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct, paracetamol (known by the brand name Tylenol here in the States) is really bad for one's liver.

      I suspect that ephedra was banned not so much for people being stupid (that is just the excuse for banning it); I believe the real reason is that it was cheap, readily available, and easily converted into methedrine (aka crystal meth, methamphetamine, speed).

      Anonymous Cow-hard

    44. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANANSBIPTBOATL (I Am Not A NeuroScientist, But I Pretend To Be One At The Lab)

      I'm still an undergrad, so IANANSBIALTBO.

      Afaik, the hippocampus is important for memory formation, not memory 'recovery'. If the hippocampus was damaged, it should be reflected in a reduced ability to form memories, not loss in memories particular to a specific event. This is why in the famous case of HM, in which the hippocampus was severely damaged, HM could not form new memories, but could remember past events, people, music, and so on, which occured prior to the damage of the hippocampus.

    45. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are getting. Am I getting 50mg of the "active ingredient" or am I getting 500mg? There is no way of knowing because there are no controls on the manufacture and no standards that they follow. One manufacturer may provide next to nothing in the pills while another may provide a whopping dose, so how do you know?
      If you read the label of most supplements you will either find the words "standardized" or "fingerprinted". "Standardized" means that the manufacturer has taken the entire source and standardized this supplement to a specific amount of the source, akin to processing the entire cow when you really just want the meat.

      "fingerprinted" means that the part of the source that is accepted to containt the highest concentration of the active chemicals is used instead of the entire source.

      i did not dare think anyone would take my aspirin example seriously, i used that analogy to illustrate the fact that you could give something widely accepted as good[asprin] to someone who either shouldn't be taking it or takes a rediculously large amount as to cause problems.

      -k

    46. Re:Carefull..... by giblfiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More on topic, changing one parameter of complex system that is possibly well tuned for what it does, but not well tuned for parameter changes, may result in a system that is far less efficient or even completely broken.

      But the human brain, as well as every evolved life form is actually very well tuned for parameter changes. Its a natural side effect of evolution, we are all evolved to, at some level, be robust in the face of tweaking (because thats what evolution is)

      That said "more, bigger brain cells" does not nessisarily imply "smarter" and may very well imply dumber. If they put the rats through problem solving test I would be inclined to have much more respect for the results.

    47. Re:Carefull..... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      On a related note, I have a friend who got into prenatal sound therapy for her two kids during gestation. They are way more hyperactive and brighter than their peers.

      What would be useful would be if she tried the therapy with one child and not the other. Your experiment needs a control. How do you know that their intelligence and behaviour are the consequence of the sound therapy and not genetics, your friend's parenting, or random chance?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    48. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about this increased activity of neurons (that's what I gather)?
      Would that speed up the "decay" of these irreplaceable cells?(i.e. faster plaque build-up?) That would be bad in some ways, younger death. But of course, it would also equal more productive youths with few senior citizens.

    49. Re:Carefull..... by arsenick · · Score: 1

      In science, the best you can hope for is evidence for something, e.g. consistent facts.

      The only existing proofs are those of mathematical theorems, and they're only connected to "reality" through the pseudo-isomorphisms our mind perceives between them, and the "real" world.

      It is an abuse of language to say that scientists prove things.

    50. Re:Carefull..... by anagama · · Score: 1


      Controling this experiment would be hard and expensive. To get really solid results, it would be nice to have identical twin mothers, both impregnated with one half of a twin embryo (if that's the right word). They would have to eat and do the exact same thing with the exception of the sound therapy - keep them in a special living facility for the duration? And of course, you mention random chance, we'd need a lot of these twin mothers. You would also want to account for differences between the twin mothers acquired in their individual lives that may have an effect on the birth.

      Anyway, the alternative therapies crowd likely doesn't have the money to do this, and even if they did have the money, it seems unlikely they would pursue actual research because the downside would destroy their business. Besides, it is easy enough to get customers with the right sales pitch and a sales pitch costs practically nothing to develop.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    51. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One manufacturer may provide next to nothing in the pills while another may provide a whopping dose, so how do you know?

      Easy. You read the label.

      I'm not a scientist, but I am a card carrying GNC Gold club member. All supplements must have their contents listed (yeah, it is that precise). Even my protein mix lists the amino acids and how much of them on the label.

    52. Re:Carefull..... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1


      ....And produce deafness...This is whay you ar enot supposed to take aspirin with Pepto-Bismo.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    53. Re:Carefull..... by whitespacedout · · Score: 1

      She followed the therapy only after examining the russian studies. I had a look at her photocopies of the material, and it looked pretty rigourous and convincing (I am a PhD in physics, and I am also pretty skeptical about alternative therapies generally, so I am quite capable and ready to pick holes in such stuff. Still, I could be wrong in my assessment - it'd be kewl if more people looked into it).

      She ended up playing the prescribed tapes of drum rhythms for her larval parasites during pregnancy. I have not been able to see a website talking about/selling this stuff though, which is kind of surprising, since seems that it would be a pretty good web biz to get into.

    54. Re:Carefull..... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Yep. Sort of what I meant, but I managed to muddle it up when writing the comment; it's not like I (or anyone else) does a whole lot of revision or factchecking on their /. comments...

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    55. Re:Carefull..... by rark · · Score: 1

      Well, the way I do it is I go dig up information on independently run tests (it's out there) -- usually someone runs tests on several brands of the same stuff at once. Yes, you get to play detective to find out how independent any given group is. If I can't find tests specific to what I want, I stick to manufacturers whose other products have been tested and shown to have what they claim to, under the theory that hopefully their quality control extends to all of their products.

      I won't pretend it's an ideal situation. At the same time, the current government regulation on pharmaceuticals has created a situation where the government is no longer reliably an independant party. Granted, I don't have to worry that there is more or less of the active ingredient, but I do have to worry about the safety and efficacy of the of the meds I'm prescribed -- whether the person who okayed this particular med was also a paid consultant for the particular pharmaceutical company and whether or not the data that led to that acceptance was cooked. If the FDA was more independent, then I would be significantly less worried both about them extending their ineffectuality to dietary supplements and herbs and about the possibility that they'd make sure that any dietary supplement or herb that threatened a pharmaceutical company's profit was made unavailable. The amount of PABA available over the counter is restricted because it interferes with sulfa drugs. That sulfa drugs are rarely used anymore and it's unlikely that you would need one administered on an immediate basis without a few days notice (it only takes a few days for PABA, like all B vitamins, to wash out of the body) unless you have one of a few conditions (allergy to all antibiotics, not just penicillin) which you are pretty likely to know about hasn't changed this. AFAIK, this is simply due to convenience, not because of sulfa drugmakers profits, but it's an example of why I really don't want to give them even more opportunity to screw up.

      Also, the vast majority of the time when a supplement or herbal preperation does not contain the amount of whatever substance it's supposed to it has *less* of that substance -- fillers are cheaper, so if someone's going to be be purposely sneaky they are going to do it that way. If they simply have loose quality control, it's likely they are also starting with cheaper ingredients, so that is also unlikely to cause a greater concentration of active ingredients. So you have a much greater risk of wasting your money than of accidental OD.

      AFAIK, none of the ephedra issues have been due to there being more ephedra in a product than advertised.

      If someone were to do such a thing, I would think criminal sanctions would be in order, should the amounts and substance be something that is potentially harmful (a power of ten degree of difference in amount of ephedra is, a small difference would not be [say 52mg instead of 50mg], an even greater degree of difference might be okay if the substance is known to be very safe) -- manslaughter if anyone dies, attempted manslaughter or assault if anyone is seriously harmed. But then, I'm not in charge.

    56. Re:Carefull..... by thirdrock · · Score: 1

      True, though interestingly enough, Ephedra, discovered by the Chinese, is not used by them for weightloss. Ephedra (ma huang)can be indicated in Traditional Chinese Medicine for dealing with cold and flu issues, but it's obviously intended for very short term use.

      According to Daniel Reid's Handbook of Chinese Healing Herbs
      - it is indicated for Wind/Cold and Wind/Damp conditions (warming) and that it's affinity is for the Lungs/Bladder.
      - effects are diaphoretic, dilates Bronchi, stimulates respiration, diuretic, suppresses appetite.

      The last effect being the probable reason why Westerners take it for weight loss , plus the fact that it raise the metabolism.

      Also ...

      - indications are bronchitis and asthma, fevers and chills, hayfever and allergies, numbness in skin and flesh, red and swollen eyes, fluid retention (edema), excess appetite, obesity

      It does go on to describe contra-indications in patients who should not use it for obesity, but other than those, weight control is an accepted use for this herb.

      Of course, the difference between buying the raw herb and decocting it yourself, and buying pills or tablets of unknown strength or method of processing is enourmous. Any major city in the world will have a Chinese Herbalist that will sell you Ma Huang.

      --
      >>
      I am the director, and this is my movie ...
    57. Re:Carefull..... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

      Though ... choline is a normal dietary component whereas ephedra, melatonin and shark cartilage aren't typical of most balanced diets. Granted people will, as a matter of principle, over do it.

      --
      Bitter and proud of it.
    58. Re:Carefull..... by ASKINVENTOR · · Score: 1

      I agree! -I think. But revving up the brain engine is only going to increase the rate of many mental illnesses. The present situation would only be made worse. Highly activated neurons need more oxygen. http://www.newpath4.com/theanswer.html Woodrow Riley www.newpath4.com/theanswer2.html. So what is THE ANSWER? Part of it is on this page: www.newpath4.com/AAINDEX/paget6.htm .

    59. Re:Carefull..... by ASKINVENTOR · · Score: 1

      Since the brain is constantly under attack from pollution, more sun rays getting thru to us thru the ozone hellhole, increasing the reproduce rate in the brain would probably cancel out and brings us back to Net - Zero. DHEA has helped my memory a lot but I ran out of money. Oxy-Nectar and Miracle 2000 from www.vitaglo.com gave me such an energy spike I invented 6 more new inventions within 4 days. I suspect those 2 products alone HAVE LOTS OF CHOLINE. www.newpath4.com/sitelist.htm for more Answers (www.newpath4.com/theanswer.html).

    60. Re:Carefull..... by painlord2k · · Score: 1

      You can find a man that can tell you the negative effects for anything you name. Just search for him.

    61. Re:Carefull..... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      BTW that book looks promising.

      --
    62. Re:Carefull..... by DesertFalcon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Absolutely brilliant. First, you write an insightful first post, thereby gaining karma for being insightful. Then you respond to it with something funny, allowing a whole new set of mod points to be spent on a seperate post.

      Twice the karma just for separating your "first post" comment into its own post.

      --
      --- 11 meters/second, or 24 miles per hour - the airspeed velocity of an unladen European swallow. Really.
    63. Re:Carefull..... by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Absolutely brilliant. First, you write an insightful first post, thereby gaining karma for being insightful. Then you respond to it with something funny, allowing a whole new set of mod points to be spent on a seperate post.

      My Karma's been maxed out for a great, long while now (at least I think). I have karma to burn and am not worried about it in the least.

      The second comment was made after I realized that yes, I did in-fact, have....First Post. I assumed I would get modded down, but hey, that's Slashdot for you. (I did think it was funny though)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    64. Re:Carefull..... by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      I always like it when I read a science thread and someone with some knowledge [i.e., a Ph.D.] of neurology is the first person to post. =)

      That being said, I wonder if an offshoot to "larger neurons" is also an increased surface area allowing for erroneous connections. That is, if such and so many neurons are required for a pathway to function with accuracy, wouldn't increasing the size of the neurons in a fixed space greatly increase the chances of seizure from depolarization across the "wrong" membrane? Wouldn't greater "ease" of firing facilitate this, as Action Potentials would require less charge?

      I'm not sure if this is what you were pointing to, but it would be first on my list of ways this might have greater costs than benefits.

    65. Re:Carefull..... by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Some of the other issues are that there is only so much space within a given area of cortex. So, if neurons get bigger, glial cells (the neuronal support cells of the brain) have to give up the space. What does this mean? I don't know for sure, but there could be less buffering capacity for pathologic events. Neuronal size often traditionally has more to do with the basic electrical properties of cables. It turns out that a couple of guys named Hodgkin and Huxley made a series of equations that describe the passive electrical properties of axons (the long distance signaling part of the neuron) and they found out that the larger the diameter, the faster and farther a given "pulse" could go. However, more to the point of your question, if electrical activity were to "leak" across neurons, I suppose that the spatial mapping of neural systems might also become less precise?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    66. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I welcome my large brained rat overlords

    67. Re:Carefull..... by Deflagro · · Score: 1

      I hear that's one of the best decongestants out there. I can never find it in the pharmacy though.

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
    68. Re:Carefull..... by nomel · · Score: 1

      more bigger...wouldn't that mean less room for all the many smaller ones that would have taken the place for the bigger ones?

    69. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhm... back in 10th grade, we synthesized acetylsalicylic-anhydride (aspirin)...
      an (anonymous) class-member munched 30+ grams of the stuff (along with residual glacial acetic acid, &al), on a dare.
      other than minor damage to the mucosa, lining the mouth, and esophagus, and a bit of a trip (school busses looked like giant, yellow, caterpillars, that afternoon -- but that might not have been the aspirin)
      n-e-way, point is: I know a survivor of a ~32000mg dose of aspirin... no stroke. no aneurism. no embolism... and plenty of other things to blame the brain-damage on.

    70. Re:Carefull..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) it's choline (as in aceta-choline), not chlorine (as in dioxin).

      2) they *did* do studies on learning rate, &c., for the rats. those who's mothers received the choline suppliments (5mg/day for 3rd trimester?) were estimated as being ~25% faster learners.

    71. Re:Carefull..... by sjames · · Score: 1

      So, you have just made the golden argument against dietary supplements and herbal remedies. Namely, there is no control over the industry so one really does not know what they are getting.

      Foods are regulated. They must contain what they say they do.

      The problem is that there are just too many people out there who would willingly drink Liquid Plumber for breakfast if someone said it would make them lose weight or grow hair.

      Ephedra is a very strong herb which can work wonders on cold and flu symptoms (especially in conjunction with dandilion and comfrey). It should be used in small quantities for short times. The people taking it for weight loss are taking a couple orders of magnitude more than they should and doing it for months at a time.

      If they treated acetominophan the same way, there would be a LOT more fatalities due to liver failure.

      It's a good thing the herbal suppliments exist given that 'conventional' pharmaceuticals are out of reach for a growing number of Americans. The last thing we need is to have the FDA similarly 'improve' herbal supliments.

  2. Not a chemist by Kickstart70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What does choline come from? Is it part of our foods, so that we could eat more of some weird vegetable?

    1. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's that stuff you put in your swimming pool. I guess if you want smart kids, you should go swimming a lot.

    2. Re:Not a chemist by mgrassi99 · · Score: 5, Informative
      from the article:

      Choline is a naturally occurring nutrient found in egg yolks, milk, nuts, fish, liver and other meats as well as in human breast milk. It is the essential building block for a memory-forming brain chemical called acetylcholine, and it plays a vital role in the formation of cell membranes throughout the body.

    3. Re:Not a chemist by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Choline is a naturally occurring nutrient found in egg yolks, milk, nuts, fish, liver and other meats as well as in human breast milk. ehm, aren't these all also high protein foods?

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    4. Re:Not a chemist by nametaken · · Score: 1

      "Choline is a naturally occurring nutrient found in egg yolks, milk, nuts, fish, liver and other meats as well as in human breast milk. It is the essential building block for a memory-forming brain chemical called acetylcholine, and it plays a vital role in the formation of cell membranes throughout the body."

      From the article.

    5. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As well as high fat, and high a number of other things. Corelation does not equal causation. In this case they isolated choline in making the tests, which is at least proper methodolgy.

      Oddly enough, working completely from memory (noncholine "supercharged"), human breast milk is the lowest in protein and fat content of any of these, as I recall ( and it's been some years since I specifically looked into this) about the same percentage as is found in brown rice.

      Although remarkable omnivores, human beings are still, deep down, essentially grain eaters. It's the Staff of Life. We require far less protein than most other predatious creatures, like cats, dogs and . . . rats. The myth of "complete protein" comes from a study done on rats in the early 1930s, and debunked in the early thirties as well, although the myth has proven nearly impossible to shake. Once something makes it into print it seems impossible to unprint.

      I'm naturally sceptical of animal studies applied to human beings, especially when it comes to nutrition. Our physiology is hardly unique, but it seems to have an odd sort of pliablity that gives strength. Like the reed bending in the wind. Unlike most animals we seem to be able to eat nearly anything, anywhere, and so long as it contains at least minimal amounts of the core substances of life, come out of the deal looking and acting basically the same. I'd say this is a prime reason we were able to spread across the earth. Wherever we went, we found food. A chimpanzee in the desert is hosed. A human will turn to snakes and lizards and do just fine. In the semidesert of a prarie, well, we're surrounded by the Staff of Life.

      I'm with Mr. Jones on this one. Until such time as there is some real evidence of effect on human development I entirely hold my judgment, and I'm not inclined to hold my breath over it.

      KFG

    6. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the stuff in pools.... oh wait thats chlorine

    7. Re:Not a chemist by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Although remarkable omnivores, human beings are still, deep down, essentially grain eaters.

      Oh, horsepucky. Humans haven't been grain eaters until very recently in their evolutionary history, pretty much coinciding with agriculture, and certainly post-dating our domestication of fire. Every try eating raw, unground grain? Bleah. Our teeth aren't made for it either. Fruit eaters, more likely.

      I'll buy the rest of it though. Yeah, humans are pretty adaptable. Oh, one other caveat with animal studies, especially rats -- humans can't manufacture their own vitamin C, many other animals can. Human minimum requirement for that was established as somewhat above the minimum needed to prevent scurvy, the optimum dose (as we're coming to realize) is probably an order of magnitude higher than that. (And being fruit-eaters would explain that -- loss of the gene to make vitamin C is no big deal if the diet is high in it. Grain isn't.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 1

      Every try eating raw, unground grain?

      Sure. I've tried wild rice, millet, and amaranth in the raw form. Not bad really, although I do prefer it cooked. I don't like raw termites either, although they are a staple food of some. I'm told I used to have quite a taste for ants though.

      You'll find my kitchen contains a fair amount of these grains in their preserved by drying form, which necessitates my cooking them to return their natural moisture content, and yes, most the vitamin C is gone by not eating them in their raw, green form.

      I'm curious, why do you suppose early agriculturalists, around the world and independantly, would go to such great lengths to domesticate grain if they didn't already consider it a staple food? It seems a pretty daft thing to do if you're already living on bananas and papaya.

      KFG

    9. Re:Not a chemist by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Inuit didn't eat much fruit and still didn't get scurvy. So fruit eating doesn't necessarily explain stuff.

      From what I see, humans that eat lots of fish (at least before fish got PCBs, mercury etc etc) do very well. Better than those that eat mainly fruit (or grain).

      I could argue that humans were essentially fish eaters, but I doubt things are always that simple.

      --
    10. Re:Not a chemist by vinnythenose · · Score: 1

      As I was under the impression, we were originally scavengers. We waited while the lions etc killed and ate the prey, waited for the hyeannas to get their share, then swooped in to eat what was left before the rats showed up. Supplement this with fruit, berries and assorted roots, and you have my understanding of original man's main diets.

      Hunting, fishing, and farming type foods couldn't have come along until we were able to make tools good enough to do those things, and that wasn't for a while.

      But, in the words of everyone on slashdot,
      I Am Not A(n) .... In this case anthropologist.

      --
      --- I used to moderate, then I read the -1 articles and decided having to filter through them was not worth it.
    11. Re:Not a chemist by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could argue that humans were essentially fish eaters, but I doubt things are always that simple.

      You must be talking about the Aquatic Ape Theory. It theorizes that humanity went through an aquatic or semi-aquatic stage in our evolution, which accounts for several features of our anatomy and physiology.

      (Admittedly, I'm partial to the Surfing Ape Theory, myself.)

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    12. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you'll find that fructose is the hardest of the simpler sugars for humans to digest. In fact endurance athletes will avoid it almost entirely since it creates havoc in the intestinal system while under stress. Even while not under stress. Many have had the experience of getting the "shits" from eating too much fruit, and you'll be hard pressed to live on it, with the possible exception of the banana, which ought to be revered.

      Starches, such as found in grains and tubers, in the presence of sufficient water, will digest nearly as fast as sugar, which we derive from. . .a grass. Which is lovely to eat raw.

      Oddly enough, we seem to be better tuned to water plants, such as rice, than land plants, where you'll also find fish. Go figure.

      No, things aren't simple, and we're essentially omnivores, but If I had to choose one thing to live on entirely it would be fresh, green rice. We seem designed for it. If I could have two things I'd add bananas, which we also seem tuned for, in moderation. Any decent survivalist can tell you you run the risk of starving to death on a diet of fish, even fairly fatty ones like trout and salmon. The Inuit also eat a lot of seal, whale, etc.

      However, suppliment starchy plants with fish, insects and the odd rodent or two and you have the nearly perfect human diet, so far as I can determine.

      Without turning to fairly advanced tools you'll have a hard time catching and making a meal from a cow.

      KFG

    13. Re:Not a chemist by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the reality for some people, aven today

    14. Re:Not a chemist by cdyson37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the stuff you put in your swimming pool is chlorate(I) ions (usually sodium chlorate(I)). The alternative is ozone gas.

    15. Re:Not a chemist by Nakkel · · Score: 3, Funny

      > From what I see, humans that eat lots of fish (at least before fish got PCBs, mercury etc etc) do very well. Better than those that eat mainly fruit (or grain).

      Well, seeing what a complete fish diet did to Gollum, Im not so sure that fish eating is so good for you.

    16. Re:Not a chemist by michael_cain · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ...suppliment starchy plants with fish, insects and the odd rodent or two and you have the nearly perfect human diet, so far as I can determine. Without turning to fairly advanced tools you'll have a hard time catching and making a meal from a cow.

      I agree with you that people seem well-suited to roots and other starchy plant products, nuts, berries, bugs and the occasional odd fish or rodent. Just looking at our teeth, we're clearly not designed to eat too much meat, or grains that are too hard.

      Cow ancestors would indeed have been difficult for people without technology, but mainly because of their approach to defense -- circle the herd with the bulls on the outside and challenge the predators. OTOH, a human in excellent physical condition can run down a North American deer (that will flee rather than fight) in less than a day. Two people can do it with considerably less effort by chasing it in circles. Relatively hairless skin and profuse sweat glands that combine for very efficient cooling make it possible. Killing the deer once it is sufficiently exhausted requires nothing more complicated than a rock to hit it in the head with. I'm sure that there are corresponding prey animals in other parts of the world.

    17. Re:Not a chemist by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      So, the lesson is to feed our kids good wholesome foods. God damn it, why didn't I think of that?!?

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    18. Re:Not a chemist by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      I could argue that humans were essentially fish eaters, but I doubt things are always that simple.

      Once we got stone weapons, I'd bet that we generally ate any kind of meat we could kill and drag back to our caves.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    19. Re:Not a chemist by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      So, on a side note, if a mother is taking antihistamines, does that fuck up the kid's brain?

      (One common class of antihistamines are anticholinergics, which block acetylcholine activity.)

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    20. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 1

      I'd rather face a lion with a pointy stick, Masai style, than a single Cape Buffalo, the indigenous cattle to southern Africa where we ourselves were beget, let alone a herd of them. They're probably the single most dangerous animal you could possibly face.

      But the real issue with the larger animals isn't even teeth, it's the shape of our skull. We've completely lost our "muzzle," that projection of the jaw what allows biting into a slab of beef, or whatever. On a large object we can't even get the thing into our mouths properly and our noses seriously get in the way. Look at a cat, which has a shorter muzzle than most predators of large animals because of its use of claws as a primary weapon. It has a fairly short muzzle compared to a dog, but it still has one, with the nose set no farther forward than the jaw. Among the primates the baboon is most prone to hunt and eat meat, and it has a distinctly pronounced muzzle, not to mention those pointy teeth.

      If we caught a large animal, in the absence of cutting tools, such as stone knives, we'd be reduced to gnawing at its shins and ankles. We bring food to our mouths with our hands, in mouth sized portions.

      Your point about running down a deer (or antelope) is one I often make, but often have a hard time convincing people of. We're endurance animals. We don't run fast on our two legs, but we can keep running at a steady pace for days at a time. Weeks even. We can run much faster animals to complete exhaustion, and evidence suggests this is exactly what we did. No need to do battle with a mammoth, mano a mano. Spook the herd, make them run. Then do it again, and again, and again. The first one to fall is the one we hit over the head with the rock and jab with our pointy sticks and cut up with our stone knives.

      But we need those stone knives to render it into pieces small enough to bring to our mouths with our hands.

      KFG

    21. Re:Not a chemist by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      When I was about 16, I had the opportunity to walk across a section of open prairie towards a small herd of American bison. At some point -- about the time that one of the bulls has clearly noticed your presence -- you realize that these are very large, very dangerous animals and that what you are doing is NOT smart. Whether you have a pointy stick, or something more sophisticated, it's NOT smart to approach them. I don't even want to THINK about getting close to a Cape Buffalo.

      Excellent point about the muzzle. Clearly, we evolved eating small things, and branched out later.

    22. Re:Not a chemist by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Talking about rocks, I've been thinking a group of people could easily stone prey animals to death even fairly large ones[1]. No need for spears or lots of running. Just fair sized rocks/stones.

      The ease of finding fair sized rocks depends on where you are, but near most rivers it isn't that difficult. Target goes for drink, the group starts throwing rocks each at it - if everyone makes a half decent hit at once, the animal is pretty much doomed - stunned then crippled then dead. Everyone gets to eat meat that night :). Heck, given enough stones the meat might actually be pretenderized ;).

      Our arms are obviously not built for torque. But with some practice many people can throw stuff pretty fast and with decent accuracy.

      Heck if I were a lion, faced with 10 rock throwing humans/prehumans, I'd go away and find some less pesky creature to eat. Sure I can beat em all, but it's not worth losing an eye over.

      For really big stuff like elephants you'd at least need spears, and luck on your side... I heard supposedly some pygmies have an initiation rite where the initiate sneaks under an elephant, stabs it deeply with a spear, and runs for the next 3 days or so whilst the elephant chases him (seems pygmy females are saner than the guys as in most other cultures ;) ), till it eventually drops dead (or gets the initiate).

      [1] I kinda got the idea from the Bible - the Bible does mention stoning people and animals to death as a common punishment - Jews are not supposed to eat animals killed that way tho.

      --
    23. Re:Not a chemist by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I'd say a hippo is actually more dangerous than a Cape Buffalo- but as long as you're far from water you're less likely to encounter one. Hippos are mean creatures. They can snap a crocodile in two with a bite.

      On a National Geographic programme, a bunch of crocodiles were tearing into a deer or something, and a mother hippo pushed her baby onto the carcass. The crocs did not touch her baby at all! For reptiles they sure aren't dumb, but I'm not sure what the mother hippo was trying to do, other than making a show of power (and teaching the baby hippo about where hippos are in the pecking order). The hippos often seemed to try to make life difficult for the crocs. At least if a croc gets you, it's nothing really personal - the croc's feels like eating and you're food.

      I sure am a far cry from the endurance runners. I'd stick to rock/spear throwing. If I'm going to be do any running, it'll be running animals over a cliff/into a trap for an easy meal.

      --
    24. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 1

      Excellent point about the muzzle.

      I have this nasty habit of not just thinking about things, but putting them to the test to see if my thoughts bear out, like Farley Mowat actually trying to live on mice when he discovered how important they were to the diet of the wolf.

      When the importance of the muzzle first occured to me I was living in Mexico and it was extremely easy to obtain a fresh, small pig carcass. You simply can't bite into one. It just doesn't work. And you aren't strong enough to so much as rip off a leg to gnaw on it, anymore than you could rip off your own leg. You need a knife. I found the upper reasonable limit to be something about the size of a chicken or duck, and even that takes a bit of work. A crow is much more human scale and a rat just about perfect, but large beetles will give you the most animal food with the least amount of work in gathering and consuming.

      You can do a rough test yourself without being gross about it. Just find a sofa bolster, or fold a pillow in half. Try to bite it. It's nearly impossible, and yet it's easier than biting a pig, with its tough, hairy hide. And if you look like Ringo Starr (like I do) it hurts your nose just to try. Your dog will gleefully rip that bolster to shreds.

      Even a large apple can present difficulties, and by the time you're up to the size of a cantalope you just smash it to get any of it into your mouth.

      Interestingly what got me thinking about the muzzle is connected to my living in Mexico at the time. I was looking at vultures and wondering why they didn't have any feathers on their heads. When I learned the answer to that it got me thinking about other physical issues of predators.

      KFG

    25. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Inuit traditional diet avoids scurvy and other vitamin deficiencies by including all of the organ meats, which isn't the way people eat meat today and probably isn't the way other hunting people went about it in aeons past (ie. those that were merely supplementing fruit and veggie diets). By eating the organs, you get all the vitamins and minerals the animal had collected.

      As you note, you also unfortunately get a bunch of nastier stuff, especially nowadays - much moreso when you eat organs (especially the liver) than mere muscle. A traditional Inuit diet probably isn't safe to eat any more. Neither, for that matter, is farmed meat or fish.

      The Inuit were in arguably the most extreme situation of any human people, though. Virtually anyone else had a more varied diet, particularly in terms of fruits, veggies and whole grains. Fish played a big part for most, and meat for some (though probably more often as part of a reward structure than a major nutritional contributor - reinforcing the adult male pecking order rather than feeding the young 'uns).

      But yeah, not that simple. What we mostly are is adaptable, and in need of many food sources. Plus which, why do people always look at the diets of ancient peoples for guidance? They didn't live particularly long or healthy lives, and there's little reason to believe they could inform our current expectation of living to be 80-90 and still play squash on Wednesday mornings.

    26. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could argue that humans were essentially fish eaters, but I doubt things are always that simple.

      I'm holding out for the doughnut theory.

    27. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the whole issue of wisdom teeth somehow related to this? A leftover from when humans had a muzzle?

    28. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely related to our ancestors not having dentists. Teeth fall out and everything else shifts forward. It seems logical that by age 16-20 most humans had lost at least one adult tooth on the top and one on the bottom. This would make enough room for all 4 wisdom teeth to come in.

    29. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully most people notice the difference in spelling, but the article refers to CHOLine, not CHLORine.

    30. Re:Not a chemist by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yep, those are the two competing hypothesis. Each is reasonable and supportable. Neither is really testable. Pick your favorite.

      KFG

    31. Re:Not a chemist by AJWM · · Score: 1

      If we caught a large animal, in the absence of cutting tools, such as stone knives, we'd be reduced to gnawing at its shins and ankles.

      Ah, but we (and our close but extinct cousin species) have been using tools for much longer than our faces have been flat. Granted, even great apes don't have much of a 'muzzle' compared to dedicated predators, but it's sufficient to get the job done -- especially since we (primates in general) have strong enough hands we can pinch up a fold of flesh to tear into. Felines and canines don't.

      Of course, we're not talking Cape Buffalo, more like deer and antelope, which are more delicately built -- they're built to run away, not just stand there looking intimidating -- and by a strange coincidence, we're built to run down animals that run away.

      (BTW, your point about just throwing stones: there's some speculation that the crudest stone tools often called "hand axes" are in fact more like stone frisbees with a sharp edge, in that they'd perhaps be more effective if thrown than if hand wielded.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    32. Re:Not a chemist by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Just looking at our teeth, we're clearly not designed to eat too much meat, or grains that are too hard.

      We've been using tools to transform our food to facilitate our digestion for a good long part of our human evolution.
      We have evolve into our use of fire to cook our food and rocks to cut or crush our food.

      Now, if we could just grow out of our appendix...stupid thing doesn't do much besides get infected and kill you.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    33. Re:Not a chemist by TheLink · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually the appendix is part of your immune system (just like your tonsils), it does some useful stuff, just many scientists aren't aware of what it does yet. Go look it up on google or something.

      --
    34. Re:Not a chemist by Shurhaian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Humans cannot subsist on an all-natural diet of only plants. One of the vitamins(K, I think, or B12; don't have a textbook handy) is not found in plant matter. Its absence over time leads to pernicious anemia.

      Bread is usually fortified with this vitamin, which is why modern-day vegetarians can get by. This leads me to believe it may be B12, since K is a fat-soluble vitamin, overdose of which is much more likely to be nasty than with the water-soluble B complex. Excess of those can strain the kidneys, but it'd have to be rather extreme.

      I am not a biochemist, but I did study it in university.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    35. Re:Not a chemist by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Actually the appendix is part of your immune system (just like your tonsils)

      Not anymore...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    36. Re:Not a chemist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1) fructose is a "left-handed" molecule -- your bodie's enzymes are "right-handed".

      2) fructose collapses into a 5-membered ring structure, with an attached methanol group. the sugars which your body likes have a 6-membered ring structure (glucose, sucrose, &c.) which have an ether bond, rather than a c-c bond closing the ring.

      now, I am not a bio-chemist (IANABC?), but I don't think that the (normal) human body actually makes use of fructose (krebb's cycle, &alia) for ATP production, at all... however...

      fructose is not the only (or even, necessarily, the *primary*) sugar which you will find in fruits. beet sugar, cain sugar, &c. are glucose based.

      for a brief summary of carbohydrates, you could check out Di-poly-carbohydrates

  3. Very profound... by Denyer · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...I predict it'll take, what, three years for the giant intelligent rats to take all of the good jobs? To say nothing of the modifications which will have to be made to accomodate them at the Superbowl.

    No, seriously, this does raise interesting issues such as how such a wonder supplement would be rationed to a population; how its absence would hold back the third world even further, and whether the first generation of hyper-intelligent kids would face discrimination at all levels of society.

    --
    Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    1. Re:Very profound... by higuy48 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would think that some percentage of Slashdotters would understand that a child who isn't challenged by schoolwork could turn into an outcast of some sort or, worse, could refuse to do work altogether. They will think of petty homework and tasks such as character charts and subjects such as The Renaissance as beneath their intelligence. I am going through a personal hell not being able to concentrate in my classes. It's all so uesless to me. Why am I reading this book? Why am I doing this math problem? I'm a writer. I need to write freeform! Anyway, that's basically the mindset of a kid who has given up on school.

      --
      And now, for a sig that's a complete copout.
    2. Re:Very profound... by irokitt · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, you don't understand. The white lab mice are already performing experiments on us. In fact, the Earth was created at their behest. We merely form part of the matrix that is meant to determine the question to Life, the Universe, and Everything.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    3. Re:Very profound... by mjihad · · Score: 1
      I predict it'll take, what, three years for the giant intelligent rats to take all of the good jobs?
      Don't worry, they'll get offshored.
    4. Re:Very profound... by Denyer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      some percentage of Slashdotters would understand that a child who isn't challenged by schoolwork could turn into an outcast of some sort

      Certainly true of some students in schools I've taught in. Many intelligent students adopt the time-honoured creed of "if you're truly smart, the smartest thing you can do is not to let them know how smart you are" as a coping device.

      I certainly couldn't envisage sitting through the tedium of school again from a student's point of view... and yet, equally, there are a lot of students who fail to realise that studying a little chemistry or maths now gives them the base to take it further should they choose to later in their educational careers. So, ultimately, my advice would be to stick with it... make an effort to find something enjoyable or worthwhile about every task you're set whilst in education, especially if it involves opportunity to gently subvert the task; more teachers have a sense of humour about such things than you might think.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    5. Re:Very profound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is 42.

    6. Re:Very profound... by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new giant rat overlords!

    7. Re:Very profound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our superintelligent rat overlords

    8. Re: Very profound... by gidds · · Score: 1

      Nuts to your white mice.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    9. Re:Very profound... by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --In Outsourced India, Giant Intelligent Rat takes job from YOU!
      :b

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    10. Re:Very profound... by xilmaril · · Score: 1
      should they choose to later in their educational careers.

      this really, really bugs me. almost as much as when adults say things like "you made a concious choice!" (to not get around to cleaning, or to have poor posture, or to not study)

      no, I didn't. I never chose to not clean up my room, and I never chose (I'm a bit older now) to take optional physics/chem/biology courses, and I didn't actually choose to take an engineering degree. it seems like a small thing to old people (the adults who've forgotten what they knew as children), but really, it's bull.

      I got decent grades in math and science, I got good grades in higher level math/physics, and I'm doing pretty good at engineering. but I didn't choose any of these paths. they're just what I'm good at. to take art history, that would be a choice. to take engineering, though, is in the same category for me as not cleaning up my room this instant. and I know I'm not alone in that.
    11. Re:Very profound... by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, consider this. It is becoming a more and more common view that human life on earth might not make it through the 21st century. Although there are many different possible causes for this (nuclear war, famine, disease, other environmental effects), I think that they all have the common factors of human stupidity and ignorance.

      What would happen if the average human became more intelligent? Although it might just be that the dumber people always get the leading roles; I don't think there are many ways in which this would be a negative development for our race. Provided it's done properly ofcourse, and not unnecessarily hasted by commercial interests.

    12. Re:Very profound... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So you're tellin me that if kids who are bored with the school system applied themsleves and made themselves more bored, they'd be more successful?

      Or to put that in lamens terms, if you're hitting your head on the wall to dround out the pain of getting kicked in the nuts hard by some girl, you should hit your head as hard as possible in order to be successful in this indeavor.

      How about taking these bored kids, giving them decent books that

      A: Aren't Condesending (Because you can't think of it this way, we do it this way)

      B: Aren't Filled with groupthink (So WE do this, and WE do it this way, and WE blah blah blah)

      C: Don't Creat an image that's desirable to become that ultamatly makes them lose touch with who they really are(The technician does it this way).

      D: Actually has good information and is well written.

      Then we surround them by teachers who care and are knowledgable and who don't waste the kids time by forcing them to do month long units on egypt including acting out plays and dances and the building of sugar cube pyramids (which is why they're bored in the first place, you dumbasses aren't doing anything useful in the first place), and let them teach themselves. Bored kids are bored because they are being held back and not being allowed to expand to their true potential, and not being allowed to go in the direction that intrests them the most. Forcing an entire class to, for example, read the same book is an example of this. Give the class a list of suggested books and allowing them to read the books they like is a far more constructive means of teaching them to read. If you snuff the fire out long enough in these kids, it'll go out in a puff of smoke and then it takes years and years to get that fire back, if they ever get it back. The bordem is conditioning them to be irresponsable, because when they go home they'll watch TV and play video games and do something fun and stimulating as supposed to reading an uninteresting book or doing boring homework that takes them 10 minutes to do. Learning is then associated with boardom for the dumber people, and for the rest of them who are smart they realise this is bad but they just don't care because they have no control over it. They can't control the fact that when they read any book, they got bored and nod off. They can't control the fact that doing the questions out of a book brings back the feeling of bring bored, it's human conditioning afterall. Trapped like a rat who has to press a lever that gives it a good jolt to get it's food.

      They then fail or close-to-fail their classes because they don't give a shit and are ostrasized for not fallowing the system; by their parents, friends, teachers, everyone. They then turn to other means to reduce their depression of being ostrasized and being called stupid, often turning to drugs or media, music or parties, crime of some sort or boarderline crime like malicious hacking or phreaking. Some of them, rather most of them, get involved with good things like computers or electronics or some other difficult task instead of video games or television and they learn skills that allow them to survive.

      Heaven forbid they ever learn what I just said because if they did they'd get really pissed. There's no telling what a pissed teenager who knows what you're upto can do, especially if they are smarter than you are and are well and truely, thoroughly pissed.

      You can take your "Educational Career" and shove it. Read some John Taylor Gatto, that'll begin you on to understanding how you're disabling your students. Read some of Joan Batley's articles from www.etherzone.com and you'll realize some of the BS you're teaching.

    13. Re:Very profound... by llama_god · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new giant intelligent rat overlords and look forward to them at our Superbowl

    14. Re:Very profound... by riksosti · · Score: 1

      Yeah, enough with the breeding mutant rats, already! First huge muscles and now supercharged brains. What's next? Advanced weapons training?

    15. Re:Very profound... by Rebar · · Score: 1

      I agree; being a little quicker in your particular area than the rest of the class has its downsides.

      Having had the same problem in school half my life ago, all I can say is stick with it now, make the grade, then do what you want with your life. Here are my reasons:

      (1) Time will come for you that your school years will seem like a *very* short period of your life. Difficult, no doubt, but just a passing phase.

      (2) For me anyway, life as a free adult is a lot more fun than life as a student. You have much to look forward to.

      (3) My adult life has been enabled by the useless hoops I had to jump through as a student. My grades were *barely* good enough because I refused to do about half of my homework. Life would have been easier had I done the homework and kept the academic scholarship, vs. working my way through University with crap jobs and student loans.

      Good luck. I feel your pain. One final tip - try to avoid the drugs as a coping mechanism. They may or may not be wrong, but they sure are illegal. Getting arrested for possession or worse is a life-defining event, so to speak.

    16. Re:Very profound... by Ipingforpong · · Score: 1

      I think I can save us a little time it's 42

    17. Re:Very profound... by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points right now - you're right on target.

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
    18. Re:Very profound... by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      ...I predict it'll take, what, three years for the giant intelligent rats to take all of the good jobs...

      Hm. I just finished reading the Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy books. I thought they've taken all the good jobs already and this is all just an illusion...

      I get more and more confused as time goes by...

    19. Re:Very profound... by ookabooka · · Score: 1

      no. the earth was created to find the QUESTION. we all know that the answer is 42. . . the supercomputer that preceded us and designed us found the answer. . . we are to find the QUESTION.

      --
      If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
    20. Re:Very profound... by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Pick a number,
      any number.

    21. Re:Very profound... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Some of them, rather most of them, get involved with good things like computers or electronics or some other difficult task instead of video games or television and they learn skills that allow them to survive.
      The only problem with the "computer" field is that video games are always one step away. This occurrs all too easily if the child doesn't have the will power to avoid the negative influence, or if the tools for using computers to the full potential aren't as available as they could be.

      From what I know, this is the only field that has such a negative influcence associated with it - Electronics, media, and some other technology fields aren't affected.
    22. Re:Very profound... by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      Life would have been easier had I done the homework and kept the academic scholarship, vs. working my way through University with crap jobs and student loans.

      That's what I tend to do. I'll say, "I'm above doing this, it's so incredibly inane I think I'd rather tongue wrestle with a barbed wire fence than do this work."

      Hopefully I'll learn that kind of thinking won't get me far. I can't imagine the universities to which I applied were too impressed with my perfect in English and Reading on the ACT and my B in my Gifted English class.

    23. Re:Very profound... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      How about taking these bored kids, giving them decent books that

      I both agree and disagree. I think you make very valid points, and that this is the way it should be. The unfourtuante thing though is that at least in my old school anyone trying it is in for a pretty brutal fight against both parents and the schoolboard. It was against policy at my elementary school to allow kids to skip grades, but it was clear to some of the teachers that many of us really needed to. So, during certain lessons some of us were allowed to go though the lessons at our own pace, with the help of one of the teachers from another class - whose own students would join up with their corosponding group in our class. The two teachers basically split up on a couple subjects like that. And, amazingly, there wasn't even any real social conflict because of it. Certainly none of us in the advanced group were ever held apart from the rest of the kids socially, or at least not for any reasons related to it. In fact, it actually motivated many kids to work harder in order to get themselves in it for some particular subject. The practice came to an end though because many parents felt sure that their own kids deserved to be in the advanced classes soley by nature of having such great parents as themselves, other parents complained that having the two groups was damaging to the self-confidence of those not in the advanced groups, and those with slower kids complained because they felt their kids weren't being given enough attention for their own special needs. The school board caved in pretty quickly on the issue.

      In short, I agree the system sucks. But I also think the only way it could possibly change is if parents were to take an objective look at their childs strengths and weaknesses in order to work with the school system to figure out how needs can best be met. And I don't think that's going to happen in large enough number for things to ever change.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    24. Re:Very profound... by mlh1996 · · Score: 1

      The quicker you figure it out, the better.

      I graduated from the US Naval Academy with a Physics degree, and spotty grades. The grades didn't matter to me much at the time, 'cause I ended up in Submarines, which is what I was after.

      Later on, when I was having some personal problems, and the resulting depression made qualifying on the power plant difficult, my boss took a look at my test scores, then my grades. I will never forget what he said:

      "It's obvious that you can do well when you want to, Ensign. Do you want to be here? I don't think you do."

      Then they fired me. Let me tell you, getting kicked out of the Navy for "Lack of Effort" does wonders for your future job prospects. And grad school? Hell, I'm getting a second bachelors degree just to prove to admissions that I can apply myself.

      Of course, it's arguable that I have ever learned to apply myself. I love my current job, except for one particular task, the results of which are due on Monday. And I'm posting on Slashdot.

      --
      Lack of creativity is no excuse for not having a .sig
    25. Re:Very profound... by Denyer · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't consider myself particularly old, adult or mature at 22. Or tidy, for that matter...

      Anyway, the point is simply that it can be very difficult to break into a subject without a basic grounding in it. I think I understand what you're saying: we tend to gravitate towards things we can understand intuitively.

      But we do have choices; I studied maths past the point I probably should have have dropped it, because I felt it was a useful tool. I certainly didn't study modern history because I was good at it. If we allow ourselves to stick too closely to areas we have a more intuitive grasp of, our ability to adapt can suffer. We also won't get surprised nearly enough.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    26. Re:Very profound... by Denyer · · Score: 1
      you're tellin me that if kids who are bored with the school system applied themsleves and made themselves more bored, they'd be more successful?

      No, you're adding in words to facilitate the rant you had stored up. But that's fine... though you'd possibly be surprised how much I agree with some of the points you raise, particularly concerning reading. (Which I almost give up on by the age of eight because of the disinteresting schemes we were fed.) You can't teach someone to read, but you can help them learn. A few basic letter and word to sound reminders, then it's just practise and friendly correction; stuff our parents did with us instinctively from a young age.

      First an on-topic response, then I'll move onto other points. If I'd had my choice at school, I wouldn't have studied a foreign language, let alone both French and German. To make it interesting, we turned any roleplay or essay task we were given into comic relief. The teachers I had were wise enough to realise that this was a form of self-motivation; we expanded our vocabulary and picked up some grammar whilst doing the bare minimum to fulfil the stated task. Anyway, both of those languages have been very useful to me... not simply in terms of opening doors to other studies (medieval English borrows heavily from European traditions) but in situations: there are more news sources I can read, and being able to string a simple sentence together when travelling makes both me and people I encounter more comfortable.

      It's been a similar situation with other subjects; history learnt at primary school fed into history I studied later... all of it contextual knowledge. I may not have appreciated it at the time (although on the whole I did have pretty good teachers who tried their best to keep us engaged) but I've certainly been grateful for it since. I'm lousy at many areas of math, but basic algebra skills and not having to reach for a calculator all of the time (thanks to a certain amount of rote memorisation) give me a handle on anything I want or need to do. There's no way in hell you would have convinced me as a teenager that this stuff was of use, or to be concerned about the future. Now that I'm here, I'm quite glad for the gentle persistence of others.

      Again, in these cases, we kept lessons fun... mostly by doing the work in the shortest possible time and using the rest to entertain ourselves. As long as you're not holding someone else back and give tasks a reasonable shot, most teachers could care less about this attitude. I've always understood on some level that, as far as the person 'in charge' is concerned, a classroom is an unfortunate but necessary balance between helping us grasp things at our own rate and having to keep tabs on where thirty-five precocious darlings in front of them are at. My open invitation to anyone who thinks that straightforward is to try it for yourself... there's only one thing to bear in mind: be ready to justify your choices and adapt if a strategy appears to be failing, because none of those kids will have that time again.

      You seem to have taken the tack that I'm attempting to pass the buck where teaching is of a poor standard, as well as responding particularly to a US style setup in which students don't advance a grade unless they jump through a specific set of hoops. Well, firstly, there's far greater emphasis on differentiated learning strategies in the UK, due to fixed progression from ages 7-16. Where it requires a different curriculum emphasis, that's provided as much as resources allow. It won't always work, but no system making one person responsible for two or three dozen others is perfect. Learning is a two-way process, not filling a bucket, as Yeats observed and you yourself echoed in the flame metaphor.

      There's no telling what a pissed teenager who knows what you're upto can do, especially if they are smarter than you are and are well and truely, thoroughly pissed.

      Fortunately we have less ready access to firearms, and I'm not particularly chicken-

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    27. Re:Very profound... by ElizabethP · · Score: 1
      Whoa.

      I'm officially motivated. I guess we need our ass kicked sometimes to get on the right track.

    28. Re:Very profound... by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

      There's another problem you forgot to mention. There's a difference between my generation, and my fahters generation. I was born as a mistake, my sister being the first of a series of them. My parents divoreced with I was 5.

      Compair me to the other preppy students who I am jealous of; they had 2 parents, a stable childhood, nice house, everything you could ask for. These people get A's in school, while the group of mistakes I sat around with were bored with school.

      Why? What causes us to be bored and them not to be bored? What causes them to call the work challenging and us to call that same work boring?

      I had to learn to cook my meals by the time I was 7. By the time I was 10, I was in band and I bowled. I had a Nes, Snes, and Genesis. My skill with videogames was indeed great, and to this day I still score higher and do more in team-based games that anyone else does. I can cook a pizza from scratch, make chicken alfaedo, cook a delicious honey ham, sew up my own clothing, repair computers, configure networks, do basic calculus, and I can argue politics more clearly than the preppy kids. I can also garden, and do a number of other tasks.

      The difference is that I was challenged. If your father was a model for god, and you're a mistake, and god abandons you or only visits you on the weekends, you must fend for yourself. Many feel it's better to piss on the mona lisa, shit on shakespear; better that god knows your name than ignores you completly.

      http://koti.mbnet.fi/reagan/lodger/ilove.html

      Watch that, that short movie is a reality for my generation of mistakes. School bores us, it doesn't heal the metal wounds, and it conditions and disables us. This may not be it's goal, but that's what it does. I'm out of school now, in college and after rejecting everything; parents, institutions, friends, I'm slowly reenabling those things that were disabled by relearning skills that I learned, and avoiding the abusive systems and institutions. Many kids in my generation are in pain like I was, and my generation will be the most fantastically screwed up and fantastically smart of all humanity. I know people who can do anything, find any information, use it to fix the most complex systems. It took the X-geners and baby boomers years to learn what it took me 6 months to learn. The citites will resemble babylon, filled with the people who were abandoned and know nothing of responsability, and those who have fixed ourselves will move together with those who were never broken and form our own society.

      That's how I see things.

    29. Re:Very profound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting points, and largely true.

      Your conclusion is a little overdramatic though ;)

      But, basically you're restating Nietsche in a way... "That which does not destroy us, makes us stronger."

      Being challenged, and rising to the challenge, creates stronger and more adaptable people than those who were never challenged.

      Unfortunately, public schools were for me the "challenge" of struggling against godawfull boredom while being surrounded by students who were basically one step up from retardation, and teachers who were *maybe* one step up from that.

    30. Re:Very profound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't see how a broad education will benefit you, it doesn't sound like you're very intelligent at all.

    31. Re:Very profound... by Denyer · · Score: 1
      Now you're borrowing heavily from Philip K. Dick.

      My ex-girlfriend's mother died slowly and painfully over about ten years, starting when my ex- was in primary school. She's currently studying for a Masters degree. The parents of a large number of the people I went to university with are divorced; others have parents they haven't seen in years or who are in different countries.

      It's part finding some sort of support from somewhere, even if it's yourself, and part bloody-minded determination.

      I have little time for faceless institutions myself, particularly religious ones... but I'm not prepared to make the blanket statement that there aren't some good individuals in any of them. I consider myself fortunate to have met a few.

      Incidentally, since you also seem to be familiar with Douglas Coupland's Generation X, might I recommend a later work of his: Microserfs. Particularly the last chapter. Because friends are as much family as family, and friends we can choose.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    32. Re:Very profound... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy angst, batman. Back off the autobiography for a moment and chill out.

      "
      How about taking these bored kids, giving them decent books that
      " ... blah blah blah

      And then maybe we give them all a poney? Your ideas are all pretty cool and utopic ... for the baby you. Rugged individualist and natural genius that you are I'm sure you'd have been working your way through quantum mechanics by 4th grade if only people hadn't been pushing you to do things you didn't want to do.

      In fact I'm sure you're such a monster brain that some impacted angst and a slashdot post were all that it took for you to completely overhaul the modern american educational system. No doubt your philosophy will apply to all children currently in school. A system that took something as monumentally complex as calulus in the 18th century and has over time evolved a method high school kids can learn could obviously take some pointers from you.

      Goodness knows the idea of learning to work in a system with your peers is tantamount to stifling slavery. Learning to do things you don't want to - or rather - having to take a little bullshit is not a valuable ability or anything. Goodness knows it's not like there's any bullshit around _here_.

      Whoa! Did you see that? I must have been pretty pissed off myself. I wonder what's up with _that_?

  4. ah crap by vena · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    as if i didn't have enough of a hard time finding a job with those genetically superior south asians walking around.

  5. I feel squeamish! oh so squeamish by mbokhari · · Score: 1

    Baby rats (mmm...baby rats) fed a little extra choline in utero popped out with brain cells dramatically bigger and faster than pups who didn't receive the supplement. baby rats...in utero...popped out....bigger and faster... Disturbing, I tell you! Disturbing!

    --
    -=- celibate by popular demand
  6. Over excited brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So now we get to find out if overclocking the brain
    with choline will lead to nasty side effects?

    1. Re:Over excited brains by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      To overlock or underclock, just take uppers and downers. Drugs...gotta love them little pills!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Over excited brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is there an overheating issue? Will they need fans in the back of their skulls?

    3. Re:Over excited brains by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      One word: Watercooling.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:Over excited brains by Muzzarelli · · Score: 1

      Yes it does. It makes you aggresive and irritable. It's great at first, but taking it long term is a bad idea.

    5. Re:Over excited brains by Matrix9180 · · Score: 2, Funny

      (sorry but I just had to say this...)

      Everyone's brain is manufactured as a genius brain, but a lot of times it doesn't pass all the performance tests and will be rated and sold with a lower processing speed. Overclocking it slightly probably wouldn't hurt anything, but don't go too far or you'll have stability issues.

      --
      120chars for a sig is teh suck
    6. Re:Over excited brains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that you find out in 20 years from now, when they've commercialized the product, fed it to a whole generation, and realized that after all maybe it wasn't such a good idea...

    7. Re:Over excited brains by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Choline (and especially a common predecessor, lecithin) has been available over the counter at least since I started buying it in 1978. Lecithin has been a food additive (an emulsifier) for a long time. It's why you add eggs to waffles, so they don't stick to the waffle iron. Choline is among the safer substances available, this is not a dangerous test compared to many things being done today.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  7. Feeding babies _what_ now? by Qinopio · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who initially read the blurb as "Baby rats (mmm...baby rats) fed a little extra chlorine in utero...?

    --
    __________
    [Big Brick Wall]
    1. Re:Feeding babies _what_ now? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Mmmm, chlorine..

    2. Re:Feeding babies _what_ now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prolly not, you can't be the only gay imbecil out there

  8. Little confused about something by modder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What exactly does "reduce the brain's vulnerability toxic insults." mean? Perhaps there is some biological terminology I am not familiar with... Also, how can they claim this will help effects of long term memory loss?

    1. Re:Little confused about something by RebelWithoutAClue · · Score: 1
      Ah-ha !

      Finally, An application of Monkey Island to Real Life !!

      --
      "However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results" - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Little confused about something by Zerth · · Score: 1

      "toxic insults" i.e. damage due to toxicity(what kind of toxins, I have no idea)

    3. Re: Little confused about something by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > What exactly does "reduce the brain's vulnerability toxic insults." mean?

      Most insults merely 'sting', but the really good ones are 'toxic'.

      If your brain has reduced vulnerability to such insults, you can post to internet forums without getting your feelings hurt.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  9. damnit, damnit, damnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    why couldn't they have figured this out 22 years ago?

    now if you'll excuse me i have to go fail my calculus final.

    1. Re:damnit, damnit, damnit! by double_plus_ungod · · Score: 1

      ha ha you're one the quarter system!

      (oh wait... i have a final on monday)
      .
      .

  10. But imagine, if you will, for but a moment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A Beowulf cluster of these super brainy rats, hopped up on choline, taking the jobs AWAY from the Indians and bringing them back to the USA!!! USA!!! USA!!!

    Sure, the rats'll have our jobs, but they'll be US rats.

    1. Re:But imagine, if you will, for but a moment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That the above post was funny!!

    2. Re:But imagine, if you will, for but a moment.... by Gyan · · Score: 1

      A Beowulf cluster of these super brainy rats, hopped up on choline, taking the jobs AWAY from the Indians and bringing them back to the USA!!! USA!!! USA!!!

      Unlikely, India's overpopulated in terms of rats as well. Still cheaper.

    3. Re:But imagine, if you will, for but a moment.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the rats'll have our jobs, but they'll be US rats.

      of course,...proper English...you, of course, meant...OUR rats.

      moderators...+1 funny please.

  11. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Someone needs to read Brave New World

    1. Re:Hmm by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention Flowers for Algernon.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    2. Re:Hmm by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      did you read the site you linked to????

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not, since the site he linked to is deconstructing Huxley's work. Ah the ironies of Slashdot.

  12. Side Effects? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thousands of parents will be rushing out and getting these supplemets, trying to "help" their unborn children.

    10 years from now, a crime wave is going to hit. A bunch of Super intelligent, yet hyperactive and ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes and photographic memory, but total lack of self-control and morals, begins their master plan of taking over the world.

    Hey, this may be an interesting Movie plot....

    People, I recommend against fooling with the brain until we actually know what we're doing. But Parents are insane anyway (looking into a mirror.)

    1. Re:Side Effects? by namespan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not only that, the worst part is, your kids will know it all!

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    2. Re:Side Effects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn, look at how high your /. UID is!! Plus, posting at around midnight on a Friday night.

      You, sir, are a loser.

    3. Re:Side Effects? by dreadlord76 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm sure you will find someone to love you in this world.

    4. Re:Side Effects? by prockcore · · Score: 4, Funny

      A bunch of Super intelligent, yet hyperactive and ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes and photographic memory, but total lack of self-control and morals, begins their master plan of taking over the world.

      Too bad their diabolical plan is easily foiled by a single dude with a strobe light. (If you read what this did the rat's brain, the rats are probably all epileptic)

      I for one welcome our autistic and epileptic overlords.

    5. Re:Side Effects? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking as someone autistic, I can tell you that choline suppliments made my symptoms worse and increased my ADD when I was experimenting with them several years ago. I was using them as well as Omega-3 fish oil to see if it would help my symptoms or at least dampen my ADD so I could study more effectively.

      WIth that, and the study this is becoming interesting indeed.

    6. Re:Side Effects? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      It should also be noted that it was found out later that fish oil contains alot of mercury thanks to power plant pollutants.

      It might have been the fish oil instead of the choline since heavy metal poisoning can reproduce the same symptoms.

    7. Re:Side Effects? by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Offtopic? It's an implicitly given reason as to my grandparent being an ass.

    8. Re:Side Effects? by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Funny

      A bunch of Super intelligent, yet hyperactive and ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes and photographic memory, but total lack of self-control and morals, begins their master plan of taking over the world.

      This is different from reality how?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    9. Re:Side Effects? by shut_up_man · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Beggars in Spain by Nancy Kress.

    10. Re:Side Effects? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Apparently methylcobalamin (methyl form of B12) might help for some cases of mercury poisoning.

      I thought the screaming about powerplant pollutants were PCBs and not mercury?

      --
    11. Re:Side Effects? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Now that you've found us out, we're going to have to kill you. ... incidentally, supplimenting the diet with nutriets isn't 'fooling with the brain' nearly so much as taking drugs that people weren't designed to take.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    12. Re:Side Effects? by nomadic · · Score: 1

      hyperactive and ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes...but total lack of self-control and morals

      Hey, sounds like a few Quake servers I know...

    13. Re:Side Effects? by monkeyfinger · · Score: 1

      A bunch of Super intelligent, yet hyperactive and ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes and photographic memory, but total lack of self-control and morals, begins their master plan of taking over the world.

      They've already taken over Counterstrike.

    14. Re:Side Effects? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      Thousands of parents will be rushing out and getting these supplemets, trying to "help" their unborn children.

      The likely outcome is thousands of fucked up kids, who got that way due to a combination of rediculous supplements and rediculous parents.

      Just looking at a drug store shelf reveals dozens upon dozens of one-ingredient supplements. Why not just go eat an egg, an apple, and a cup of tea and get them all in one meal? Not to mention that an egg, an apple, and a cup of tea cost pennies, while these supplements can cost anywhere from a nickle to a dollar per pill (times multiple pills).

      The only reasonable way to use supplements is to say "damn, I have arthritis in my hands. For this one specific known problem, I suppose I can start taking glucosamine." Taking these supplements out of some sort of magical foresight is just dumb.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    15. Re:Side Effects? by Brando_Calrisean · · Score: 1

      Hey, this may be an interesting Movie plot....

      Movie?! I see a first person shooter!

      --
      Don't call me a cowboy, and don't tell me to slow down!
    16. Re:Side Effects? by zenyu · · Score: 1


      I thought the screaming about powerplant pollutants were PCBs and not mercury?

      There is a big case in New York on PCB's, but part of the reason is that GE was a manufacturer and spilled shitloads of excess production into the river. Mercury is a big problem everywhere. It's used in all kinds of industrial processes, while PCBs are no-longer used in new transformers and no longer mass produced. Even the Atlantic Ocean as a whole has too much mercury. Fortunately the South Pacific is still relatively safe, you can eat several fish a month from South America, while one a month is a safer figure from the Atlantic (a little more, depending on the diet of the fish, vegeterian fish are safer, as are non-bottomdwelers (i.e. not cod)). Farmed fishing is switching to feeds from South America, of course this is a bit of a problem as Peru has overfished sardines to near extinction there and Chile has exhausted their Chilean Sea Bass stocks. Incidentally the Peruvian fishmeal factory (singular) is located in a national park, where it's effects have been studied by very depressed park rangers.

      Fishing quotas are one area of law where international government could be a godsend. The Peruvian scientists very much want Icelandic style resaleble fishing quotas, but the government rightly argues any fish stocks Peru doesn't plunder will be caught by Japanese and Russian trawlers. They don't have the money to police their sea like China or Iceland does. America just doesn't have an interest in policing it seas, instead we just buy fishermans' boats and give them welfare, they are not important enough to protect.

    17. Re:Side Effects? by Deanasc · · Score: 1

      I loved it when it was an episode of "Max Headroom". So it is true. All art eventually does become reality.

      --
      I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
    18. Re:Side Effects? by danila · · Score: 1

      Your example is too unrealistic. Messing with the brain is unlikely to have harmful side effects for anyone but the kids in question. And we have plenty of kids to experiement on. :) So I recommend for fooling with the brain until we actually know what we're doing. When we know what we are doing, it will be time to stop messing with it and start doing exactly what we want.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  13. Yippie by nathanhart · · Score: 1

    Your tax dollars hard at work

    --
    GeekLeak.com - Silly name, serious geeks
    1. Re:Yippie by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Creating GATTACA? :( Great, just what I needed... better start hitting the books.

  14. Improving mother nature by cybermint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Choline is a naturally occurring nutrient found in egg yolks, milk, nuts, fish, liver and other meats as well as in human breast milk."

    I remember a study a long time ago that suggestest that children who were fed breast milk as a child, were on average, slightly smarter than those who were fed other substitutes. With so many things, what is natural seems to be beneficial to the body, possibly because we evolved to benefit from our natural surroundings.

    Perhaps the time where natural is best is coming to an end. I for one, support this even though it may mean that my natural mind and body may become obsolete. The thought is scary that some day I may find myself left in the dust by a choline fed, geneticly altered, super human. If this is what must be done to better all of humanity; push mother nature aside; finish what God started; then I can only say one thing. May the best man win.

    1. Re:Improving mother nature by www.fuckingdie.com · · Score: 1
      Keep in mind that even a good thing, if not taken in moderation, can be hazardous of fatal. I am sure that even if choline were to be proven a wonder supplement, and everyone were to start using it, there would still be those who suffered ill fate due to overuse.

      I know many a naturopath who has ended up in the hospital because of the mistaken notion that natural means that there is no such thing as an overdose.

      --
      That really is my homepage, no kidding.
    2. Re:Improving mother nature by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Perhaps the time where natural is best is coming to an end.

      Also remember, rattlesnake poison and polio are natural. Natural doesn't mean good or bad really.

      >The thought is scary that some day I may find myself left in the dust by a choline fed, geneticly altered, super human.

      Without getting into the "what is smarts" questions, you can outperform many people if you put some work into it. The kid with the 140 IQ who is addicted to Everquest or thinks learning Klingon is a good way to spend his time will be crushed by the average kid who did his homework that night.

    3. Re:Improving mother nature by AJWM · · Score: 1

      I remember a study a long time ago that suggestest that children who were fed breast milk as a child, were on average, slightly smarter than those who were fed other substitutes.

      IIRC it's the higher levels of taurine in human milk (compared to other mammals, or to formula) that aid brain development (or so goes conventional wisdom). I think they throw a bit more of that into the formula mix these days.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Improving mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what if he had a 140IQ AND did his homework every night?

    5. Re:Improving mother nature by slobbit · · Score: 1

      Rats have slightly different uses for their brains than people, and a somewhat different growing pattern. What seems to confer a limited advantage to rat brains is not necessarily good for people, just as a food that's good for growing cows (cows' milk) is inadequate for growing humans.


      I remember a study a long time ago that suggestest that children who were fed breast milk as a child, were on average, slightly smarter than those who were fed other substitutes.

      There are in fact numerous studies which solidly establish that feeding artificial milks to human babies reduces eventual IQ scores by up to 10 points. These have been rigorously controlled for feeding method and socio-economic status. 10 points might not seem like a lot at 110+, but oh what a difference it could make for the under-100 set.


      Breastmilk is the only thing that comes close to being a complete food for infants. Don't pay any attention to the commercials that try to convince you otherwise. They can only put in those formulas the essential elements of breastmilk that they've identified and can produce relatively cheaply. They can't put it in if they don't know it exists, and they're still finding new stuff.



    6. Re:Improving mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kid with the 140 IQ who is addicted to Everquest or thinks learning Klingon is a good way to spend his time will be crushed by the average kid who did his homework that night.

      Speaking from my own personal experience, I don't think so. Through school, a lot of people struggled with the work, whilst I didn't bother revising or anything and usually ended up top of the class. I've not got a 140 IQ either.

      It would be nice to say that there's no fundamental gap between two peoples' mentail abilities, but to be perfectly honest, I think that's just not true.

      I'm not trying to say I'm better than anyone else, each of us have our own talents, but all through my life, I've been described by everyone I get to know as smarter than anyone else they've met, which I find quite bizarre as I don't put any effort into learning stuff, I just seem to soak it up without trying.

      Of course, this has its downsides as well; I'm bone idle as a result of this, although I don't suffer from the social problems often associated with smart people.

    7. Re:Improving mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The kid with the 140 IQ... ...will be crushed by the average kid who did his homework that night.

      Nice theory. But no. I have a 130 IQ and I regularly wiped the floor of those who did their homework - and I spent far too much time playing Doom.

      I understand that IQ is a measure of ability to learn. From memory, a kid with an IQ of 100 will take 30 to 50 repetitions to learn a a new topic. A kid with an IQ of 140 already will take 1 to 3 times. By the time the class is over, the kid with the IQ of 140 already has it memorized, down pat, and will be able to pull it instantly from memory a month later.

      (On the other hand, if the kid doesn't pay any attention, and doesn't do assingments, then yes, he's boned).

    8. Re:Improving mother nature by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Also remember, rattlesnake poison and polio are natural. Natural doesn't mean good or bad really.

      I think you're being unnecessarily harsh. It DOES seem that foods which undergo the least processing are healthiest. Getting vitamins from whole foods is generally regarded as better than getting them from tablets. Formula milk for infants is so far inferior to natural breast milk that I'm amazed it's still legal to sell. It's certainly true that just because something's "natural" doesn't automatically mean it's good, however I think the OP's point still stands.

      Without getting into the "what is smarts" questions, you can outperform many people if you put some work into it.

      You don't think there are genetic or nutritional components to work ethic?

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    9. Re:Improving mother nature by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Without getting into the "what is smarts" questions, you can outperform many people if you put some work into it. The kid with the 140 IQ who is addicted to Everquest or thinks learning Klingon is a good way to spend his time will be crushed by the average kid who did his homework that night.

      This is absolutely true. This also means that parents to actually manage to create some sort of Frankenstein monster of a kid but can't keep up with their childhood are going to end up with a very intelligent very misguided and very depressed teenager and adult.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    10. Re:Improving mother nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, IQ is a measure of logical reasoning, although the effectiveness/correctness of that statement is in dispute amongst researchers.

    11. Re:Improving mother nature by zenyu · · Score: 1

      Even implementing hardware to prevent execution of non-executable code is insufficient, since all you do then is point at some executable code that can be exploited (e.g. -- buffer overflow to point at system(), and then execute your commands that way).

      Some mothers can not produce milk, or not enough milk for their infant. We used to have wet nurses, but there is a problem there. The milk changes as the child grows, so milk from someone whose been nursing for 3 years is not as good as the milk of a mother that has just given birth for an infant. So formula is a good thing, it can suppliment the mother who can not produce any or enough milk, and it's better than the alternative in many cases. We also keep improving it as we find more and more things it's missing. It's only been a hundred and thirty years since it was invented, in another few hundred years it may be equal to real mothers milk. Today every mother knows mother's milk is better, hence the breast pumps and the like. There are even drugs to help a mother produce more milk when she can't keep up. Still formula fills a niche.

  15. Size doesn't equal smarts.... by MagicDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, the article just says that the baby brains are bigger than normal and the neurons seem to be firing faster, but there hasn't been any testing as to whether these guys are any smarter than the average bear (or rat). It does look interesting, but last I checked, in humans there hasn't been any correlation between hat size and IQ. Elephants and blue whales have the biggest brains on the planet, but nobody's calling them the most intellegent creatures in the world.

    1. Re:Size doesn't equal smarts.... by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Because they have so many nerves to control (at least that's partially it).

    2. Re:Size doesn't equal smarts.... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      RTFA

      It's trying to use this evidence to explain why choline suppliments increased the congnitive functions of adult rats.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Size doesn't equal smarts.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you ever heard of Ecco the Dolphin? Or Star Trek IV? Or that one Simpson's Episode where the dolphins take over?

      If popular media is correct (and when is it not?), then whales *are* the most intelligent creatures on the planet, and probably aliens too. Duh.

  16. Doogie by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember a while back a scientist bred a mouse strain with altered NMDA receptors, which gave a pretty hefty increase in memory and apparently reasoning. It'd be interesting to find what additional effects this method might have on them.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:Doogie by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      I remember a while back a scientist bred a mouse strain with altered NMDA receptors

      Isn't CA working on a mouse with NDMP receptors?

    2. Re:Doogie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but would you settle for Microsoft working on a mouse with SNMP receptors?

    3. Re:Doogie by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I know for a fact that Hitachi has a mouse with UDMA receptors.

      How many more FLAs can we use? :)

    4. Re:Doogie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How many more FLAs can we use? :)

      A very good one, but I learned about TLAs the other day... now, about the Hitachi mouse: I'd say BS, but then I've seen mice with telephones, with radios, there must be a mikey mouse, too... d^L^b

  17. If this headline was on Fark.com... by Zenmonkeycat · · Score: 1
    "Researchers find way to make smarter babies. Duke sucks."

    And 20 years from now:
    "Brilliant super-baby drives car into side of White House. Jailarity ensues."

    --

    *****
    Dear Mary,
    I yearn for you tragically,
    A.T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.

  18. Toxic insults... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My brain is already resistant to /. trolls...

  19. Let's see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Duke University researchers say the implications are profound for humans


    Let's see, choline grows baby rat brain cells... sounds like great news for the cheese industry!

  20. Side effects not so good by Punchinello · · Score: 4, Informative

    "May result in cirrhosis and fatty degeneration of the liver, hardening of the arteries, heart problems, high blood pressure, hemorrhaging kidneys."

    I'm not so sure I want too much of that stuff in a human subject.

    --

    Remember... ZG9uJ3QgZm9yZ2V0IHRvIGRyaW5rIHlvdXIgb3ZhbHRpbmU=

    1. Re:Side effects not so good by Catnapster · · Score: 1

      What is it with scientists? "Yeah, we found this awesome drug that makes you live thirteen years longer, three times smarter, and makes you absolutely irresistable to the opposite sex. But there are a couple of side effects too.

      "Like, uh, brain damage, heart attacks, coma, and/or death."

      --
      The world can be wrong today for once.
    2. Re:Side effects not so good by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 1

      You got that from here right?

      Those are symptoms of Choline deficiency !!! In other words, those are the bad things that could happen when you don't get enough Choline

    3. Re:Side effects not so good by ElizabethP · · Score: 1

      The hemorrhaging kidneys sounds like the most fun part.

  21. Adults Suplements Are What We Need by osewa77 · · Score: 1

    :-) Else we son't be making any real difference to the world.

    1. Re:Adults Suplements Are What We Need by osewa77 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, even if we could make people smarter just by giving them supplements, is being smartsuch a good thing all the time?

    2. Re:Adults Suplements Are What We Need by memco · · Score: 0

      How exactly is stupidity beneficial except in the case of marketing... and the amusement of others? You can have a lot of fun with those who are "stupid" (I believe they could be smart if they tried...) but in the end, it litterally pains me to watch to stupidity. It's so... stupid.

      --
      Get me a meat pie floater!
  22. I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    welcome our new supra-genius rat overlords.

    You didn't think I'd risk my karma on this did you?

  23. We're going to do what we do every night Pinky by StormyWeather · · Score: 0

    http://www-public.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de/~fischeni/ resource.html

    1. Re:We're going to do what we do every night Pinky by StormyWeather · · Score: 1
  24. And you thought... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...your generation found television boring!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  25. I ben drinkan a lot of clorox by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    an me way smarter than u!!!11!!! lOlOL arofol

    extended warranty? how can i go rong!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  26. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new bigger, faster, baby rat overlords.

  27. Choline Supplement by Jodka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You can buy choline in almost any of those stores which sell vitamins and nutritional supplements. I live in New York and there is one on every corner.

    I read something similar about over a year ago in Science News magazine. Curious and willing to experiment on myself, I bought a jar of choline and started taking one a day.

    Here's what I noticed:

    First, its it's an intestinal irritant. Its sold in gelatine capusules and if you just swallow one a day, you'll be sorry after a while. I recommend opening the capsules and disolving the choline in something buffered, like milk.

    You don't notice anything for a few weeks. And after you stop taking it, the effects persist for weeks.

    The stuff is defintely psychoactive. I was constantly locked in deep thought. I finally stopped taking it because I got tired of thinking all the time.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:Choline Supplement by whig · · Score: 4, Informative

      DMAE (Dimethylaminoethanol) is another choline-related supplement that has a more immediate effect due to it's ability to cross the blood-brain barrier directly (choline does not). Once DMAE enters the brain, it is methylated (Kreb's cycle) to choline, and has very noticeable effects.

      --
      Peace and love, y'all
    2. Re:Choline Supplement by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      I was constantly locked in deep thought. I finally stopped taking it because I got tired of thinking all the time.

      Damn, another failed Deep Thought experiment! Will we ever know the answer to the ultimate question? What about the question to the ultimate answer? This is getting very frustrating, folks!

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    3. Re:Choline Supplement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up

    4. Re:Choline Supplement by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. First, its it's an intestinal irritant. Its sold in gelatine capusules and if you just swallow one a day, you'll be sorry after a while. I recommend opening the capsules and disolving the choline in something buffered, like milk.

      Depends on the form/packaging. Solid and powder forms are available also. These don't cause me any problems, though I have iron pipes and can eat anything short of poison or tin cans.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    5. Re:Choline Supplement by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      You probably used choline bitartrate, which can cause problems in large doses. A better choice is choline hydrochloride, which has a hideous taste that can be masked to some degree with tomato juice or V8. Lecithin provides choline at the cost of calories. Other forms are available, choose what works for you.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  28. This is great... by thryllkill · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...if you're unborn. Call me selfish, but I want drugs that make me smarter. Stupid rats!

    --

    Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

  29. smarter.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Smarter children thru:

    Playing with them, spending time with them.

    Giving them toys, then spending time showing them how the toys work. Toys that challenge them to do something are good - like legos - stay away from "Disney type" toys (yeah, I know, it's a blanket definition. You know what I mean)

    Teaching them to read - don't wait for fucking kindergarten, teach them yourself. Added benefit of getting to know your kids better. Books. Lots of books. Share the reading with them. Read to them, with them, and for them.

    Answer questions. "Why is the sky blue?" Answer it. If you don't know how to, learn why it is. There are a lot of questions that a kid will ask that will require you to to know at least something about it. The hardest part is translation. I asked that question when I was very young, and my old man told me that it's because it's the color that "comes thru"; later I learned that he wasn't bullshitting me. I really appreciated that. He didn't evade the question, just tried to put it in terms I'd understand.

    Which leads to

    Don't ever, every lie to your your kids. Don't bullshit them. Not about anything. If they ask you about sex, don't evade the question or bullshit them - they'll find some other avenue to educate themselves, and it will likely be something that's not the best way to learn it. You might have to actually think about it to find some way to explain it to them. Do it. You might learn something, too.

    Don't ever, EVER try to bullshit your kids, or evade what they are curious about. You will lose their respect and trust when they find out (and they do, eventually, and that's one of the biggest problems in the US right now, but that's a whole 'nother topic). /rant :(( :(* :)

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    1. Re:smarter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Answer questions. "Why is the sky blue?" Answer it.

      So, you expect my 4-year old niece to understand when I explain light-scattering theory? The sky is blue because light scatter is proportional to the inverse of the 4th power of the wavelength of light.

      I didn't learn what exponents were until grade 4 or 5, let alone algebra.

    2. Re:smarter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Get a prism. Show her what white light is made of.
      Explain that the blue light bends more and gets bounced all over the sky so that whichever way you look you see the the blue. Yellow and red come straight through so the sun looks yellow. You can simplify without lying to her.

    3. Re:smarter.... by grozzie2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Smarter children thru: Playing with them, spending time with them.

      Are you implying folks should invest time and effort into the process, and not just drive down to the supplement store and try buy a pill to make thier kids brighter?

      And from the article:-

      "Choline is a naturally occurring nutrient found in egg yolks, milk, nuts, fish, liver and other meats as well as in human breast milk."

      The plain english translation, feed your children a naturally healthy and balanced diet, and it will automatically include the required items. But, you wont find any of this in the stuff dished out of a typical fast food joint. If they live on french fries, hamburgers, and a big gulp, they will never get the stuff they need to be bright, it'll show on the grades, and on thier waistline.

      So, what's new about any of this ?

    4. Re:smarter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Don't ever, every lie to your your kids.

      Life starts with lies:

      God made you.

      God made the world.

      Bad people goto hell.

      etc.

      As nice as your post is, its fairly obvious parents want to lie and have no interest in seeking out truth, especially truth that is unpleasant.

    5. Re:smarter.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so right, they lied to us about Santa Claus, then we find out the Tooth Fairy, and Easter Bunny are also not real... Then when you get older you figure out that God/Jesus/Religion, this whole reality they impressed upon you from birth, a fundamental cornerstone of the way the universe works, doesn't exist either?! Who can you trust these days... (:

    6. Re:smarter.... by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Don't be too ambitious there. I don't know much about child development, but kids can only do so much. I was 5-8 years old playing frogger and I don't think I got to the third level once. Still fun and I must have played it for months, while doing other things (may dad had a boot menu for dos to start a bunch of games automatically).

      Otherwise, a good general idea. Child rearing takes time and effort.

    7. Re:smarter.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you.

      Teach. Don't assume that the school system will do it for you. Did when I was young. Rarely does anymore.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    8. Re:smarter.... by anadem · · Score: 1

      > Smarter children thru:
      > Playing with them, spending time with them.

      right, absolutely right. the nurturng parent's children meet the world with kindness and humanity

      the righteous parent's children live in fear and alienation

      read Moral Politics by George Lakoff -- we have to take back the vocabulary of nurture: you pay your dues, not get ripped off for taxes

    9. Re:smarter.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      So, what's new about any of this ?

      That's exactly what I was wondering, and why I posted.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    10. Re:smarter.... by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      we have to take back the vocabulary of nurture: you pay your dues, not get ripped off for taxes

      *snort*

      Try teaching that to your kids. Hell, try teaching that to most adults.

      Give me a break.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    11. Re:smarter.... by qute · · Score: 1

      "Teaching them to read Answer questions. "Why is the sky blue?" Answer it"

      I agree.

      "Don't ever, every lie to your your kids."

      Wrong. I've only been a parent for 4 month's (her children 3 and 6).
      I have a palm, the oldest ask: Can it play games. I answer "no". It's a lie. It won't hurt him. Lets pretend I said "yes". He would have begged me to play it and I would have said no every time. He would be _very_ sad. I have gained NOTHING and he would have gained nothing.

      Children are not adults. They cannot (always) understand logic reasoning. But of course I avoid lying, if possible.

      --
      -- Make software not war
    12. Re:smarter.... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      And in what way is that a lie? He didn't ask "is it physically possible for me to play with the palm?" He asked if you would let him, and guess what? The answer was no.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    13. Re:smarter.... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1


      Don't ever, EVER try to bullshit your kids

      You are very correct. I remember how condescending adults were when I was young, and I remember how it led me to distrust them and become very cynical, which is not good for a child. Adults who think kids can't see straight through their antics are fooling themselves.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    14. Re:smarter.... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      feed your children a naturally healthy and balanced diet, and it will automatically include the required items.

      Not only that, a balanced diet will provide thousands of things (most of which are probably unknown) that the supplements never will. Science, it all its glory, is still in its infancy and is very myopic, especially with respect to nutritian and medicine.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    15. Re:smarter.... by dbc · · Score: 1

      You can find ways to explain it that make sense at a 4 year old level, and are the truth. My 4 year old daughter, given a card that says C2H4 and an organic chem model kit, can build an ethylene molecule. Does she understand all aspects of that? No, but we talk about numbers of bond holes on an atom, and using them all up makes a molecule. An organic chem kit is about equivelent to tinkertoys in complexity.

      You can do a lot of things besides chemistry in analogous fashion. If you explain the rules of the game at a level they understand, they can accomplish wonderful things. People just don't even try, which is a shame. The young mind can absorb a great amount. It is a sponge for facts, even if critical thinking is not yet online. Early on, we got a small skeleton model and muscle charts, and started teaching anatomy. One day while swimming with her at the Y, she started naming her muscles with the latin names. (She was 2 1/2). It amazed people around us. It should not. Any kid exposed to that information could do it. And it's fun! What a hoot to hear: "Daddy, I hurt my patella."

      And BTW -- she also knows the family honor code by heart. Some of the important things in life are non-techie.

    16. Re:smarter.... by koreth · · Score: 1

      Of course, one could always do all that and supplements. It's not like the two are mutually exclusive. Not that I'd give my kids brain-altering substances without a lot more safety data, but the point is, if there's some supplement that's beneficial, it'll probably be beneficial to well-raised children as well as to fast-food-junkie latchkey kids.

    17. Re:smarter.... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I would say a little "bullshitting" might be a good thing, done on an occasional basis. For example, to the "why is the sky blue" question, answer:

      "Because the day before you were born I was painting a fencepost and I tripped, the bucket flew up in the sky, and splashed the sky blue. I liked it so much, I didn't change it."

      See what their reaction is, then wink and laugh - see if they understand the "joke", that you were "ribbing" them. Then explain why the sky is really blue (translated appropriate for their age and intelectual development level, of course).

      I would think playing such a charade on the kid would help stimulate the humor side, as well as help teach the kid not to believe everything they hear as "gospel", so they learn to question more...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    18. Re:smarter.... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      The plain english translation, feed your children a naturally healthy and balanced diet, and it will automatically include the required items.

      Possibly. As a rule, lab mice tend to be nutritionally very well off. I think the question is whether one could get enough choline from a normal diet to have any actual effect.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  30. And once the third world gets their choline... by modder · · Score: 1

    We will begin to complain again about outsourcing, since we can no longer compete. Rather than properly analyzing the problem and creating solutions which help everyone.

  31. "quotes" by Jodka · · Score: 1

    Was "anyone" besides me "annoyed" by the superfluos "quotation" markes in this "article".

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    1. Re:"quotes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "yes"

    2. Re:"quotes" by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      There was one Ok usage:
      "...choline "super-charged" the..."

      The rest (aside from speech quotes) were terrible.
      '..."methyl group" of atoms..."

      However, it really depends on his regular audience, if they are appropriate. Does his audience know what a methyl group is? Or even roughly? It's a science blog though...

    3. Re:"quotes" by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Too many commas by me though :)

    4. Re:"quotes" by Jodka · · Score: 1

      "However, it really depends on his regular audience, if they are appropriate. Does his audience know what a methyl group is"

      Is it really ok generally to put unfamiliar words in quotation marks ? I think not.

      One particular category of unfamiliar words, slang, yes. Technical terms ? No. What does it communicate by adding the quotes ? Nothing. It's not like by using the quotes the author informs the reader of anything, the reader presumabley is aware of whether he knows the meaning of a word or not. Better so than the author.

      With slang, quotes help. Its a warning to the reader that if he does not know the word, thats because its not really a proper word, its slang, so don't bother looking it up in the dictionary.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    5. Re:"quotes" by jjhlk · · Score: 1

      Slang, definately.

      But I think if you are talking to an audience completely ignorant of science then quotes with complex terms might help. If talking to scientists or even regular people under today's education who are ignorant of some term you wouldn't want the quotes. But imagine someone who came from england, 1700, or say the whitehouse. Quotes might reassure the reader you aren't making things up.

      Maybe not, but that's what I suspect.

  32. Kids hate choline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least kids around here do.. you can't walk though the mall with out seeing one or two empty boxes of dramamine .

  33. Babies by olrik666 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    In Soviet Russia, babies supplement food!
    Or something like that. Anyway.

  34. Magic Serum Makes Rats Smarter by Ray+Radlein · · Score: 1

    ...but let's just see how Algernon is doing in a couple of months.

  35. Create or Cure? by MoggyMania · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This strikes me as a bit bizarre.

    Humanity already has a fairly well-known subgroup of people with brains that have more active neuronal structure, greater capacity for memory, a drastic reduction in age-related decline in cognitive/memorizations kills, and heightened sensory reactions. (Which is all wonderful to have, speaking firsthand.)

    The response from the community has not been to embrace us. It has been to force us into painful "treatments" from a young age that train us to "act normal" -- to hide all signs that we're different, including strong natural interests in learning and pain at stimuli that doesn't bother sensory-average humans. There are huge organizations decrying how horrible it is that we exist at all, that actively claim it'd be better if we died of cancer, because we don't act just like "normal" people.

    It strikes me as bizarrely hypocritical for one wing of science to be fighting to find a way to prevent/cure my kind, while another is attempting to learn how to intentionally create us. We're already here, we tend to reproduce reliably within families, we just need to be accepted rather than terrorized into hiding our abilities.

    1. Re:Create or Cure? by Libraryman · · Score: 3, Funny
      All right Mr. Murdock, I'll bite.

      Q: who are you?
      You aren't going to age
      You have super-sensory perceptions.
      Society has stepped all over you with painfull treatments to force you to fake normalcy.
      You have an enhanced memory.
      Huge organizations oppose your existence and are trying to give you cancer.

      A: you are a mutant.

      But the real question is what year did you graduate from Professor Xavier's Shool for Gifted Youngsters? Class of 2000? 1999? Or are you old school?
    2. Re:Create or Cure? by Daengbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Based on these two posts, he's apparently talking about some form of autism, either Kanner's or Asperger's, and from this one, I am willing to bet that he is a she, though he could be gay, but the way the post is written comparing men to women makes me believe otherwise.
      I'm intrigued because, although my sister is autistic, I didn't know anything about these two types until I read her/his posting history.
      I'm looking at this site for more info.

    3. Re:Create or Cure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't oppose you, for one. I really wish you well, if nothing else because if you get ill you're gonna cost me money.

      Ok, you might have foes. But you might make friends, too. It's all in how you act. Even if you don't want friends, you can be left alone by the right people.

    4. Re:Create or Cure? by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      It's a girl

      Can't believe I spent time finding this.

    5. Re:Create or Cure? by James+Lewis · · Score: 3, Insightful
      While I feel it may be somewhat useless to point out the obvious to what is most certainly a somewhat delusional individual, I suppose I might as well try. From reading your other posts, I would assume you are speaking of autism. While it is true that this is an "illness" (sort of like hyperactivity) that is overdiagnosed, I think it is going a bit far to claim that "There are huge organizations decrying how horrible it is that we exist at all, that actively claim it'd be better if we died of cancer, because we don't act just like "normal" people." Where are these organizations? If they are so huge, why is it that I have NEVER heard any group claim cancer is a solution to autism?

      Now, if you like having the symptoms of autism, that's really great for you. But most people would agree that many of the symptoms of autism are not desireable, such as impairment in social interaction, delay in, or total lack of, the development of spoken language, apparently inflexible adherence to specific, nonfunctional routines or rituals, stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms, etc. Furthermore, many of the things you named are not strictly associated with autism. Such as, "more active neuronal structure, greater capacity for memory, drastic reduction in age related decline in cognitive/memorization skills". And "heightened sensory reactions" generally means that many stimuli that normal people are indifferent to are PAINFULL to those with autism. Autism is not associated with any particular IQ, although 3/4ths experience "significant mental retardation". There are, much rarer cases where the individuals have "savant" abilities, or are very intelligent. Unfortunantly, some of them are not able to benifit from these abilities because of the aforementioned symptoms. There may be some people who gain avdantages from the disorder, but science and the public at large would like to see people with only the advantages, and none of the disadvantages of autism.

      Anyway, the bottom line is that if you can be happy the way you are, that's all you should care about. There's no need to make up delusions of being oppressed by huge organizations, or to deny that autism in general has no disadvantages. If you are lucky enough to be on the "high functioning" end of the autism spectrum, be thankful, and remember the further you go down the autism spectrum, the more and more those individuals are like what people commonly refer to autism, and the more those people are impaired.

    6. Re:Create or Cure? by univgeek · · Score: 1

      In your culture, yes it sucks to be different, it sucks to be 'intelligent'.

      In most other cultures, you'll find that academically gifted children are treated like gods. Social or athletic skills etc are barely on the radar. The only question is whether you are intelligent. After that, you can do whatever you want.

      Sure, it isn't a 'balanced' upbringing, but most of those people seem to have turned out into well-adjusted adults anyway.

      Change your culture, the nerds Vs jocks thing has been taken way too far.

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    7. Re:Create or Cure? by dasheiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Humanity already has a fairly well-known subgroup of people with brains that have more active neuronal structure,


      There are huge organizations decrying how horrible it is that we exist at all, that actively claim it'd be better if we died of cancer, because we don't act just like "normal" people.


      I was assuming you were just talking about geeks in general, but this really lost me. What subgroup of people are you talking about? And if it's just the geeks which org is wishign us dead?

  36. Dur. by big_groo · · Score: 3, Informative
    Thank you Captain Obvious.

    How about a recommending a balanced, healthy diet, with exercise, for pregrant mothers -- *and* soon-to-be-fathers ?

    PS. I'm not a scientist.

    1. Re:Dur. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      PS. I'm not a scientist.

      But you are an asshole. The grandparent apparently is aware that from the sales of diet supplements and herbal remedies it appears that a significant portion of the population is not aware of the side effects like this and I for one am glad to have real scientists posting on the Slashdot.

      Remember Spain 3/11

  37. As an aside by Sarojin · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would make them grow up to carry a certain odour?

    Trimethylaminuria ("fish odour syndrome") can be triggered by a kidney or liver infection or the excess intake of the chemical choline, which the body turns into trimethylamine.

    BBC article

    --
    HOW'S MY POSTING? CALL 1-800-POSTING
  38. Half an hour already... by stevens · · Score: 1

    ... and no one has said it yet:

    I, for one, welcome our new rat overlords!

    And since that's best I could do. I need a shot of choline.

  39. Choline by mjihad · · Score: 1

    http://www.mycustompak.com/healthNotes/Supp/Lecith in.htm

  40. Are you pondering... by Helios292 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...what I'm pondering, Pinky?

    1. Re:Are you pondering... by Kelz · · Score: 1

      I think so Brain, but what do fjords in canada and scantily clad women have to do with the food suppliment?

    2. Re:Are you pondering... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure am, Brain!

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Are you pondering... by gnupun · · Score: 1

      How is this offtopic? Brain is obviously a choline-fed super rat!

  41. There's already a name for highly-clocked people by Pyromage · · Score: 1

    We're called GEEKS 8-}

  42. Enlarge your babies'... by unknown_host · · Score: 0

    I hope this doesn't mean more spam....

  43. Future of learning...(late night buzzed ramble) by Erratio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before things are addressed on a chemical level, they need to be addressed on a psychological one. The educational system, at least in the States, has progressed very little in the past century, even though it has been pretty much established that different minds work different ways and the current methods for teaching cater to only a very small percentage of the people. All the choline in the world won't compensate for a lack of utilisation on what's already there, which, as it is, is most often neglected, or used in a way which results in burning out before full potential can be reached.

    --
    I don't try to be right, I just try to make people think
  44. Not the problem by Kelz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Duke University researchers say the implications are profound for humans and the future of learning."

    The problem isn't with intelligence. Its a problem with the school systems. I am in high school right now and I'm amazed how dumbed down even my Calculus class is. What was grade school level 10 years ago is High school and college level today. We need to tighten the standards and make classes more challenging. There is a huge population of "smart" students but 90% of them just get by by taking the easiert classes possible. Half of my classes I don't even know why I show up.

    1. Re:Not the problem by shadowmatter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You say there is a huge population of "smart" students, but are they also motivated? Right now you say they're just getting by taking the easiest classes possible, which leads me to think that they're largely unmotivated. Thus if you tighten the curriculum, they're more likely to give up than try harder.

      As someone who went through the same dumbed-down-Calculus experience with some friends...

      1. If your lecture is dumbed down, read the textbook for the details
      2. Read ahead
      3. Talk to your professor, and ask him for a separate, more challenging curriculum
      4. Go online and find more Math to learn; try some linear algebra or real analysis, for example
      5. Above all, don't rest on your laurels, and don't rely on the curriculum -- I can't believe how much time I "wasted" in high school, when in retrospect I could have been using some free time to learn some really cool shit...

      - shadowmatter

    2. Re:Not the problem by humankind · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      What good are more brain cells if they're not properly programmed?

      Teachers don't get the respect and remuneration they deserve. The educational system in the U.S. is the pits. You don't make anyone smarter through dietary supplements; you do that with experience and exposure to wisdom.

    3. Re:Not the problem by michael_cain · · Score: 1
      Teachers don't get the respect and remuneration they deserve.

      Teachers in a modern industrialized society are caught in an unfortunate economic bind. Teachers today are roughly as productive as they were 30 years ago. For example, my kids' high-school classes are about the same size and they learn approximately the same material in the same number of years as when I was in high school. Over the same 30 years, many (most?) other jobs have become much more productive -- steel workers produce more steel per hour of labor, engineers produce designs with far fewer hours of human labor (consider the savings from replacing most of the support staff with computers), a ditch-digger with a backhoe instead of a dozen with shovels, etc. As a result, teachers' pay tends to fall behind relative to other skilled fields. I wish I knew an answer.

    4. Re:Not the problem by boobsea · · Score: 1

      The problem is with teachers getting education degrees that are not challenging to receive and gives the teacher little academic experience in the subject they will be teaching.

      What good is a teacher if the teacher has little or no experience in the area he or she is teaching?

      If you are really interested in the problems with modern schooling, the book Dumbing us Down does an excellent job of detailing them (from a teacher, no less).

    5. Re:Not the problem by boobsea · · Score: 1

      The problem with high school is that it usually leaves you with little or no time to get into any real academic pursuits.

      My high school day is 7 hours long. I usually have something to do or read every night (since I'm in several AP classes).

      The problem is that such a long school day is exhausting - all of my idle time has been spent listening to underqualified teachers try to "teach" and spoon feed the class with worksheets and heavily structured study plans (read this chapter this night, then do this, etc).

      The waste of time IS high school. It does not allow motivated students to get into the subject on their own, nor does it leave much time for students to learn something completely independently thats not part of school.

      High School puts shackles on the motivated and the intelligent and says that State mandated cirriculum and State standardized tests are more important than what you want to learn.

  45. that's not necessarily better by hak1du · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A smarter rat doesn't necessarily correspond to a smarter human. And human intelligence isn't necessarily related to whether the hardware is faster. By analogy, a DSP may run operations faster than a Pentium, but that doesn't make the DSP a better general purpose processor. Or, as another analogy, just upgrading the clock circuit on your motherboard doesn't just make your processor faster--it may also make it flakier. It's plausible that choline is somewhat beneficial as a nutrient during pregnancy. But I wouldn't expect miracles (if choline were that important, women would crave more of it than they do), and there is at least the possibility that an unbalanced intake actually might do some harm.

    1. Re:that's not necessarily better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you're absolutely right. I mean, Windows-based PCs used to run faster than Apple computers, but really, it's how you use it.

    2. Re:that's not necessarily better by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      And hitting a rat in the skull with a hammer, doesn't mean you'll get the same result hitting a human in the skull with a sledgehammer.. :p

      strangely, animal testing is often relevant.

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    3. Re:that's not necessarily better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just upgrading the clock circuit on your motherboard doesn't just make your processor faster

      overclocking your brain?

    4. Re:that's not necessarily better by asr_man · · Score: 2, Funny

      A smarter rat doesn't necessarily correspond to a smarter human.

      We're pretty sure it corresponds to a smarter lawyer though.

  46. Intelligence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt we need smarter kids [or rats] instead maybe we need to better educated kids [and adults].

    Intelligence is nice and has taken us a long ways - it seems that perhaps enducation & maybe some wisdom is really what is lacking.

  47. Damn! by ndogg · · Score: 1

    Makes me wish I were still an egg within my mother's body!

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  48. can't wait for the spam by netnerd.caffinated · · Score: 3, Funny

    i can just see it now, viagra flavoured choline supplements that not only keep you hard, but improve your memory!

    --


    You tried your best, & you failed miserably,
    The lesson is:
    Never Try
  49. Great for rat babies. But what about for me? Now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since we're on the topic of improved memory and learning. I'm one of the layed-off dotbomb folx. It's been 10+ yrs since I was in highschool, and now I am back in College struggling with classes.

    Any suggestions for supplements that will make studying, concentration, retention, etc of classroom material improved?

    I know everyone drinks massive amounts of caffiene. Methamphetamines seems like it would be good at first glance but I've read it causes horrific brain damage so that's out. I've heard choline and ginko biloba mentioned before. I'm wondering if anyone knows of things that work, or will help.

    I think one of my biggest problems is trouble remembering things, retaining and manipulating lots of new info at once to complete assignments. I'm so slow at it, I'm getting crushed under the workload, and I think the combination of both being older, and also not fresh out of highschool hurts immensely. I'm wondering how everyone else deals with it (besides dropping out, or committing suicide, etc)?

  50. Re:Great for rat babies. But what about for me? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get laid. College chicks are great for stimulating the cognitive powers.

  51. Rats eat everything we eat, and more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rats can eat anything a person will eat and plenty of things that we won't.

    1. Re:Rats eat everything we eat, and more! by kfg · · Score: 1

      And note that rats have gone everywhere people have, in their company.

      KFG

  52. Crap! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    NOW they discover this. :(

    Can I get a do over?

    Here's hoping the reincarnation crowd is right.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  53. Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the kind of science that can easily get hurt by controversy. The press release doesn't say, but what if these neurological differences translate to significant behavioral differences? The implications for humanity would be for nothing so trite as "the future of learning." How about the disparities between social classes and ethnic groups? Do impoverished mothers get enough choline? Are there ethnic diets that include more or less choline, and is it reflected in their average intellectual abilities? (And how to quantify that is a whole other subject for debate!) These are important questions that may go unanswered if the wrong kinds of people get a chance to put their spin on this. Heaven forbid we find out there's a biological reason why the underpriveleged can't seem to get ahead, even if it's brought on by social conditions rather than something intrinsic. Just watch... if the reasearchers get too close to implying something like that, their funding will get cut and the whole thing will be swept under the rug. Remember how the media roasted Herrnstein and Murray?

  54. bovine prion disease from melatonin? READ PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    bovine prion disease from melatonin? how about from BEEF? i am willing to bet you are NOT a vegetarian with all the anti-herbal statements you made. now i like proof too, but you are just throwing bullshit around like its fact (yes shark cartilage is BS though). melatonin WORKS for me and a LOT of other people who have problems sleeping and it is also anti-cancer (PROVEN). ephedra also works for fat loss and studies comparing it to other alternatives show it as the clear winner, can you say greedy drug companies? as for cardiac arrest, try not taking 2x the reccomended dose? whats that? you dont know what your getting? GNC STRICTLY checks ALL the products they carry to make sure the claims on the bottle (amount wise) is correct and they arent the only ones. i dont know what aristolochia fangchi is and it may well cause organ damage or cancer. i am in no way saying we should all just take shit because someone else says it does such and such, but melatonin and ephedra are proven, and frankly, if you take Meridia or some other Rx weight loss drug at higher than reccomended dose you will die of heat stroke or cardiac arrest as well (just a note the baseball player who died died of heatsroke and had been fasting for days as well, speaking as someone who has taken ephedra it does not make you not eat). get off this highhorse bullshit of "i want proof" and then not accepting studies that someone else provides. you want some truth? the medical system in the U.S. (and most if not all other countries, no anti-us sentiment here really) is designed to make drug companies money, not make you well. Fen-Phen anyone??! VIAGRA anyone? any of the other medications with side effects such as "spontaneous bleeding", "liver damage without a history of liver problems", etc? Do you know how many people die taking tylenol, compare it to how many die taking ephedra. yes more people take tylenon but the numbers still make tylenol more dangerous. sorry for the rambling nature of the post but i just had a wisdom tooth extraction and this codeine is messing with my thought process and i am aware my spelling is pretty bad (sorry)
    dont get me wrong, lots of "western" medicine is great and if i was shot i wouldnt want to be anywhere except an emergency room in a western country, but many M.D.s are arrogent pricks. i work in a GNC, and pregnant women come in and refuse to take mutli vitamins (not buy, but take) because their doctors tell them it could harm the fetus? this is based on some bunk research that too much vitamin E (as in WAY too much) can cause mental retardation. notice how ANDRO and other prohormones have been banned along with ephedra? can someone say cheap alternatives that WORK WELL to Androgel(TM) or Meridia(TM)? wake up and see that neither the F.D.A. or a panel of MD's OR supplement companies really have your best nature in mind? its up to YOU to find studies and rate the effectiveness of something? you really trust a medical association that in the 60s prescribed methamphetamine to people for ANYTHING (my uncle was prescribed dexadrine because he had MONO and was tired??? the -worst- thing to do).

  55. Re:Great for rat babies. But what about for me? No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone try BrainQuicken?

    http://www.brainquicken.com/

    It sounds great from reading their site. Well duh. Supposedly a lot of athletes and 4.0 students use this stuff. I wonder if it really works?

  56. Two immediate reactions by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Animal studies do not always give an accurate indication of what will happen in humans. The article seems to have nothing proven relavant to humans.

    Further, a typical human diet already includes choline. Assuming this is important to human brain development, how much do we really need? I can understand that rats (who typically probably do not eat fresh eggs very often) might need a choline supplement to enhance brain development. Perhaps humans already get enough anyway.

    Might it be possible to identify the amount of choline different populations receive from their diet and correlate this with intelligence? This would give a better basis for discussion.

    1. Re:Two immediate reactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choline is good for Lucid Dreaming...

      Take it with some vit.B's.

  57. Choline ke pichhe kya hai? by Branch_Dravidian · · Score: 1

    Ho, choline me bheja hai meraa...

    1. Re:Choline ke pichhe kya hai? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      OUCH! For those who don't know, the parent is referring to "choli ke pechhe", a mildly naughty song in Hindi, from a Bollywood picture.
      "Choli ke pechhe kya hai?" translates as "what's under the blouse?"

    2. Re:Choline ke pichhe kya hai? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell you: let us have Esperanto now while we still have time. English was (and is!) such a pain in the ass, imagine having to learn chinese or hindi.

      And you think it ain't gonna happen, that's what the French said in 1900.

    3. Re:Choline ke pichhe kya hai? by marcus · · Score: 1

      I wasn't alive in 1900 and I don't expect to be in 2100, so... no Hindi or Sino-whatever dialect for me.

      Thanks anyway, I'll stick to English, with a sprinkle of Spanish here and there, until the day I die.

      OTOH, if for some reason I do live that long, I'll have plenty of time to change my mind. ;-)

      --
      Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
      - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  58. Smarter children through.... by humankind · · Score: 1, Troll

    no television...

    a healthy non-supplement.

  59. "Smarter children" B by obtuse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What kind of simpleton thinks that more and faster neurons is better, or makes for smarter children? You get those for free with cancer and epilepsy.

    Just give your kids meth if you want to boost their IQs. That'll bring the scores up, but do you think that makes them smarter in any meaningful way?

    In my rash youth, I tried a number of different drugs, (here are examples of my own stupidity) including drinking a over liter of whiskey one evening, an unknown pill given to me by a guy in a superhero costume at a SF-Con, and a few things that can either enlighten or precipitate psychosis, depending on your personal biology, and whether you believe that any significant insight comes in chemical form.

    However stupid I was, I would _never_ have given significant quantities of neurotransmitter precursors in a fetus or a child.Neurons have to communicate to be useful, and there are good indications that a neuron's rate of fire is actually related to information content. Or do you think we can determine intelligence by weighing people's brains?

    The brain is marvelously subtle, and incredibly malleable in youth.

    You want your kids to be smarter? Teach them. Play with them. Stimulate their senses. Show them the world that rewards you for paying attention to it and thinking about it. If this isn't enough for you, then you can make them smarter by having somebody else raise them.

    Anybody who tries this on a human child should be sterilized, preferably with a shotgun.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:"Smarter children" B by Gyan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Young kids have roughly double to triple the synapses as an adult. The synapses get pruned due to lack of use. So your "stimulate the senses" is good advice, which is another way of saying Use It or Lose It. In the same vein, getting more neurons and increasing firing rate might help. It's certainly not automatically a false cure.

      whether you believe that any significant insight comes in chemical form.

      Are you a dualist? If not, your "experience" and "skills" are a matter of chemicals and connections. If you're referring to psychedelics like LSD (which I think you are), all they do is disrupt regular circuits. Any "insights" are a result of experiencing and processing those altered states. If you're unconscious and given LSD, you won't get any "insights". It's not the chemical that provides the insight (or even enables it, except in a technical sense).

    2. Re:"Smarter children" B by KingJoshi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Young kids have roughly double to triple the synapses as an adult. The synapses get pruned due to lack of use. So your "stimulate the senses" is good advice, which is another way of saying Use It or Lose It. In the same vein, getting more neurons and increasing firing rate might help. It's certainly not automatically a false cure.

      How do we know that "losing it" doesn't make us smarter? maybe it's a form of search tree pruning and learning heuristics as we grow. Maybe the trick is pruning the right ones.

      It's hard enough to really test intelligence because people are skilled/talented/gifted at different things. But are there studies showing correlations between more synapses and being smarter in adults?

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    3. Re:"Smarter children" B by Gyan · · Score: 1

      But are there studies showing correlations between more synapses and being smarter in adults?

      Not directly. But kids (with 2x/3x the synapses) learn languages (and just about anything else) much better and quicker than adults. One of the prominent (and biologically plausible) theories of cognitive science is the connectionist approach. And those connections are the synapses.

      How do we know that "losing it" doesn't make us smarter? maybe it's a form of search tree pruning and learning heuristics as we grow. Maybe the trick is pruning the right ones.

      Simply because, at any given time, the brain only prunes those synapses which don't get excited by the current environment. It doesn't anticipate what paths are optimum for novel situations, so there can't be any "pruning the right ones" (a dull environment might prune synapses which could have been potentially useful 6 years later). Which is why it is emphasized that a child should have a rich mentally stimulating environment during their first 3 years.

    4. Re:"Smarter children" B by KingJoshi · · Score: 1
      Not directly. But kids (with 2x/3x the synapses) learn languages (and just about anything else) much better and quicker than adults.

      Granted they learn better, but they also know much less. How do we know that reduction isn't part of "knowing"? Also, how do we know the brain isn't wired so that it's specifically designed to learn and adapt as a child and not do so as you grow up (which makes sense obviously) but that while there is a correlation with large synapses, there is not necessarily a cause/effect relationship. Simply because, at any given time, the brain only prunes those synapses which don't get excited by the current environment.

      Which is exactly what you'd expect a heuristic learning algorithm would do! It's a greedy algorithm (as is evolution). Obviously, the key isn't the number of synapses, but how they connect and relate. What exactly is stored and how they're stored is still mostly unknown (beyond general terms, we know we store general face prototypes, not per person, but some group classification).

      Yes, a child should have rich mentally stimulating environment because we know that they have much to learn and adapt to so they shouldn't over adapt yet.

      Well, just tossing out ideas. Makes sense at the moment. I'm also into Cognitive Science and Michigan State has a good program here for that. But I'm mostly in the AI and NLP field.

      --
      In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    5. Re:"Smarter children" B by Gyan · · Score: 1

      Granted they learn better, but they also know much less.

      Coz they haven't spent that much time alive. In the same period, the child more richly stimulated, will know and learn more.

      How do we know that reduction isn't part of "knowing"?

      Clarify this. Doesn't make much sense to me right now.

      Also, how do we know the brain isn't wired so that it's specifically designed to learn and adapt as a child and not do so as you grow up

      Coz growing up is a cultural concept. You learn and adapt all the time, till old age. Just not as well, when an adult.

      Obviously, the key isn't the number of synapses, but how they connect and relate.

      The second part is exactly why your first part is false. The neurons are the constituents, the synapses are their connectors. More synapses = more neural paths.

      Yes, a child should have rich mentally stimulating environment because we know that they have much to learn and adapt to so they shouldn't over adapt yet.

      That's tangential. The first 3 years are crucial because that's when the basic template gets carved in. Once this crucial window is past, it's much difficult to "learn" some things. The second landmark is lateralization of brain function (for language - Broca/Wernicke's areas in left hemisphere). There are plenty of examples in neuroscience textbooks about feral children ("raised" in wild) who are rescued early as 5 yrs old, yet can't successfully learn beyond rudimentary language.

    6. Re:"Smarter children" B by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      So by your logic any pregnant woman who eats eggs should be murdered. Nice.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  60. Fish and Scurvy... by Takuryu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I don't know anything about how the Inuit prepare their foods, I do know that eating fish can prevent scurvy.

    The important thing to remember is that it needs to be eaten raw: baking, cooking, leaching, frying... in short, cooking fish (meat for that matter) breaks down the vitamin C in the food, rendering it useless for nutrition (and the prevention of scurvy).

  61. Wow.. by bheading · · Score: 1


    Wow, let's create a master race!

  62. Choline in food - the easy way by SoundGuy666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Liver, cauliflower, soybeans, spinach, lettuce, nuts, and wheat germ are decent natural sources of the stuff, and eggs contain rich veins of choline.

    --
    Why can't we all just get along?
  63. improved children through enlightened parenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    obviously, they must be fed well, but for real 'smarts', they'll need accurate information.

    strange brew thats good for you, too.

  64. A human is not a rat! by Kunt · · Score: 1

    Guess what? You can't draw parallels like that!

  65. That thing got a hemi? by Branch_Dravidian · · Score: 1

    I can imagine the kiddie brain supplement commercials 10 years from now... SLACKJAWED REDNECK WELFARE MOM(Looking over at the hydrocephalic uber-freak in Yuppie Princess/Junior Soccer Mom's stroller): "That thing got a hemi?"

  66. food supplements by fat32 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Most products today follow popular demand. There is nothing wrong with this...as long as consumers are completely informed. However, most merely follow fad, fancy and place trust in commerce. But since commerce in turn follows consumers, there is no true progress, just a circle of followers.

    This is not to suggest that we are perfect, or have all the answers. Nevertheless, as knowledge grows, we will have continuing advancement, as well as faithfulness to our core belief that health and a better world are not only attainable, but a responsibility.

  67. Bah! by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Informative
    What's a little epilepsy when you've got NICE FAT NEURONS? And what's a little cardiac arrest when you can be nice and thin?

    This smells like an advert for the herbal suppliments people. Remember, you can say anything on the label as long as you say that the FDA has not verified those claims in fine print somewhere on it. And people will buy into anything if you make it sound scientific and claim that Researchers at Some University think it could be revolutionary. I bet you could convince people to take mercury suppliments without too much effort. Hell, there was just a story on NPR the other day about that being a problem in some South American countries.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  68. Ugh by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Damn you for making me remember that trite piece of garbage. I want a drug that can erase memories.

    Boy will I have a hard time with the English department if I ever go back to school...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  69. Slackers by Jack+Zombie · · Score: 1

    "(...) turn into an outcast of some sort or, worse, could refuse to do work altogether. They will think of petty homework and tasks such as character charts and subjects such as The Renaissance as beneath their intelligence."

    Obviously, you don't need to be a genius to do that.

    --
    "You should never doubt what nobody is sure about." -- Willy Wonka
  70. Swimmers by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 0, Troll

    They should look at swimmers' children. They should be chock full o' the stuff.

    1. Re:Swimmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll? I'm not sure if he's trying to be funny or insightful, but I don't think he's trolling.

  71. Usual comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rats... overlords... welcome... you know the drill.

  72. Choline is Natural by (eternal_software) · · Score: 1

    What everyone seems to be missing here is that choline is natural and occurs in foods we eat everyday. This isn't some scary untested drug... this is a staple of many people's diets.

    For this reason, it is possible that we evolved to use this substance during development.

    Here's some of the foods that choline is found in:

    Cabbage
    Calves' liver
    Cauliflower
    Caviar
    Eggs
    Garbanzo beans (chickpeas)
    Green beans
    Lentils
    Rice
    Soybeans
    Soy lecithin
    Split peas
    All animal and plant products.

  73. Yeah, right. by elmegil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, keep in mind too, that in a sample of two people I know of (myself and a friend) Choline made the subjects EXTREMELY depressed. Sorry, but I don't plan to experiment on my children like that.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  74. i've been taking supplements for years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fun facts

    Lecithin is the best artificial supplement of choline and insotol.

    If you don't like pills, eggs (yolks) are your next best bet.

    Choline/insotol supplements increase ejaculate volume. Sperm cells and brain cells have a lot in common chemically. Subsequently chronic masterbation can adversely affect your memory because you keep dumping your body's stores of choline. Absurd but true!

    For more info check out lecithin.net

  75. Profound, eh? by poofmeisterp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's start giving this to all of our kids!

    Only the usual side effects apply: cancer, tics, siezure, SIDS, chronic headaches, brittle bones, frequent loose bowels....
    But my kid will be SMART!!!!!

  76. simpsons by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    it reminds me of that ep of simpsons where lisa is president... and they talk about that program for healthy and smarter kids

    "we only made stronger and smarter super criminals"

  77. Pinky and The Brain by Rich+Klein · · Score: 1

    This explains where The Brain came from, but what about Pinky?

    --
    -Rich
  78. Mods are just on crack, thats all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man who get mod points get this huge ego and starts going out punishing anyone who does not think inline with their system of thinking.

    Its just as simple as that.

  79. Interesting bias here... by Chemisor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > A bunch of Super intelligent, yet hyperactive and
    > ruthless 9 year olds, with ultra fast reflexes and
    > photographic memory, but total lack of
    > self-control and morals

    I wonder why everyone seems to assume that any improvement in human capacity is always accompanied by "total lack of self-control and morals". If any correlation is warranted, it is the reverse. Perhaps it is all just sour grapes?

    1. Re:Interesting bias here... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, this always seems the most apparent on tv sci-fi like star trek or the second outer limits series. Self-improvement above the level of normal humaity always seemed to be shown as, at best misguided and leading to bad things, or at worst just plain evil. The only time I can think of it being shown in a good light is when the finger of God magically comes down to "evolve" a race for no reason other than they've been around a long time. I've always wondered if these shows were imparting the idea that altering humanity is evil, or came about as a result of it.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    2. Re:Interesting bias here... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      I wonder why everyone seems to assume that any improvement in human capacity is always accompanied by "total lack of self-control and morals".

      I took that as a reference to the fact that they were 9 year old children. Not many children that I know have a lot of self-control.

    3. Re:Interesting bias here... by SD-VI · · Score: 1

      Maybe at some level most of us believe that morality is the indirect result of stupidity, that people aim for a code of ethics to follow because it gives them a framework with which they can interpret the world around them (for what good is data without rules to sort it?).

      Or maybe it's because it's a central plot device in lots of entertainment. Who knows?

    4. Re:Interesting bias here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the latter. The Man doesn't want you to become smart!

  80. Re:bovine prion disease from melatonin? READ PLEAS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    uh, nobody read that

  81. horse puckies are made of grain :) by anonymous+coward+2.0 · · Score: 1
    Another vote for horsepucky :). "Grain" is the seed of any one of a variety of cultivated (usually grassy) plants. It only becomes efficient to harvest and eat it when it is available in fairly large monoculture... Farming isn't particularly old in terms of evolution. I would be willing to accept that starchy tubers, roots, and fruits were an important part of our diet, but until the advent of agriculture grain was probably an occasional windfall.

    Harvesting the seeds specifically is quite important. We certainly are not well adapted for grazing. We have a fairly standard issue digestive system, and our teeth only get replaced once (horses, and cows have specialized digestive tracks, rodents and lagomorphs (rabits) have teeth that grow continuously). Even more importantly if we apply our teeth to gathering grass we can't see any approaching predators, (or the aproach of other groups of humans). We would be well suited for detecting ravenous earthworms and snails however. Since grassy plants are mostly indigestible cellulose we would also have to spend most of our time pulling it out with our hands just to get enough nutrients, and it won't be as easy as weeding a garden either. Havesting and processing the seeds is very important... oh yeah and it's highly seasonal too :) we would have to eat something else for the remaining 10 months of the year anyway. (The african plains have dry and wet seasons folks, I know they don't have summer/winter)

    It's also very well established that many (I suspect most, but I don't have any numbers to cite here) pre-agricultural peoples hunted. Also note, people (like wolves) are very well built for endurance running. In fact we are even built for endurance in a high temprature environment (we sweat profusely and have a large surface to body mass ratio, unless of course we eat too many cheetos). We are remarkably poor sprinters (20-25mph for 100 yards or less is very slow for an animal of our size). If you can't sprint you won't get away from most predators, but endurance running can be used quite effectivly to run down large animals, especially for herding them into traps and ambushes.

    Also I think for analysis of our evolved state with respect to diet, the relevance of our past behaviors is decreasingly relevant the further into the past you go. If you take it back far enough primates all evolved from a sort of tree shrew, and it probably ate insects. The most relevant thing is the condtions of early agriculture, and pre agricultural hunter-gatherers. IMHO at least.

    --

    Version 2.0 New and Improved!

  82. Re:Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by bratboy · · Score: 1

    But wouldn't it be interesting to discover that what were thought to be genetic predispositions turned out to have a considerable dietary component - passed down through the generations mimetically, not genetically.

  83. Re:Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by Catamaran · · Score: 1

    As pointed out by Donald D. Dorfman in the link that you provide, Herrnstein and Murray were engaged in non-peer-reviewed psuedo-science. The scientific flaws in their work were numerous and are well documented. See The Mismeasure of Man by Stephen Jay Gould for a critique of this and other attempts to put a scientific basis to racist beliefs.

    --
    Test 1 2 3 4
  84. Overboard, but true... by MacFury · · Score: 2, Interesting
    During my middle school and high school years my school district cut funding for the gifted class severely. The superintendent thought we were too elitist. This was before any serious budget crisis so lack of money was not the reason for lack of funding.

    I didn't drop out of high school because of the pleasure of being in a class with intellectual equals. Without my gifted classes I wouldn't have the drive to succeed in life.

    1. Re:Overboard, but true... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      I didn't drop out of high school because of the pleasure of being in a class with intellectual equals. Without my gifted classes I wouldn't have the drive to succeed in life.

      Do you really and truly think that public school provides anything--anything at all--that is necessary to succeed in life?!? You are placing too much weight in the superindent's decision, as he is just running his bureaucracy into the ground like most schools in the country. If you percieve that you have failed in some way, you are probably looking for causation of any form, and the "gifted" classes being cut looks like a good scapegoat. Gifted classes really do create an awkward social strata in schools, not because of the subject matter, but because of the students, parents, and teachers themselves. If you need stimulation at school, there is always the debate club or something like that. Meanwhile, just enjoy doing the find-a-words in your new-found "English" class.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    2. Re:Overboard, but true... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Do you really and truly think that public school provides anything--anything at all--that is necessary to succeed in life?!?
      Is there any indication otherwise?

      During my youth, I was told by my parents, my teachers, and many television ads that school is the *ONLY* way to succeed in life. Even though there were notible exceptions (e.g. Bill Gates dropped out but founded Microsoft), I was told that such people were ultra-geniuses and that regular gifted students could not succeed through that avenue.

      It took until college to know otherwise. Until then, I had to rely on teachers to provide an education that was never delivered.

    3. Re:Overboard, but true... by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1

      It took until college to know otherwise. Until then, I had to rely on teachers to provide an education that was never delivered.

      Anyone who needs a degree in "Education" before they feel they are qualified to teach is someone who is typically not fit to become a teacher. Most teachers cannot give good advice about being a well-adjusted and successful adult, because they never were one!

      Public schools are good for educating a minimum-wage workforce but no better than that. People who go on to do interesting things with their lives recieve their educations from all sources but their schools.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
  85. No offense but... by index72 · · Score: 1

    this is well documented and hardly new news. See www.prestigepublishing.com. I've got a $140 bottle of phosphatidylcholine(PhosChol brand) in my refrigerator of which I partake 2 tsp per day along with about 2 dozen other nutritional supplements. Its embarassing to see how BADLY misinformed you slashdotters are when it comes to nutritional subjects. Why would anyone want to take PhosChol? To help repair the damage to cell receptors and transfer peptides that are the heart to functioning of the human body. What causes the damage you ask? Well, exposure to pesticides, herbicides, heavy metals, gasoline, diesel... you get the idea. BTW I was poisoned in the womb. I didn't have a say in the thing one way or the other.

  86. It's not the hardware, it's the software... by localman · · Score: 1

    Sure, there may be some small tweaks that can make the brain run a little more efficiently, but I'm convinced that it's what we learn, when, and how that make us "smarter".

    Think about the difference between a fresh untrained neural net that runs on a G4 vs. a G5. Big whoop. They're both useless. The G5 can be trained a little faster, but you probably wouldn't notice much difference until the speed differential was greater. Number of neurons is probably more critical, but again, only when huge differences are seen.

    Well, that's my uneducated opinion anyways :)

    Cheers.

  87. Attack of the Giant Brain Babies.... by Darth23 · · Score: 1

    I can see it coming now.

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  88. Smaller Children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's how I originally read the title.
    I thought "Hell, just let 'em keep eating McDonald's and Wal-Fart food. We'll soon be a nation of midgets as it is."

    1. Re:Smaller Children? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I don't understand: McDonald's has been repeatedly sued for causing obesity and obesity-related medical conditions. The fat content of the average fast-food sandwich isn't conducive to weight loss, by any means. I think it would be a good thing if we were getting smaller, but I don't see that happening any time soon.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  89. Bigger =! Smarter by lawpoop · · Score: 1
    Faster, bigger brain cells do not mean a smarter baby. In fact, a few months after birth, certain brain cells start dying off, because they're not necessary. They're just raw material for the "final" brain. It's like the hand -- in the womb, the hand is just a blob. The cells in between the place where the fingers will be die off. That's how the finger form, and thus how the hand gets its basic shape.

    So I think it's kind of premature to make any preditions about the intelligence of such a baby. But, as long as we're doing it, my prediction is that those extra cells will die off, and the brain will go the normal course of development.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
  90. Can't believe I haven't read this yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey!

    I for one, welcome our new giant intelligent rat overlords.

  91. Re:Choline is Natural -- how much is too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    quantity and concentration are the variables here... ever heard of "too much of a good thing"?

  92. Raw grain by slurpburp · · Score: 1

    'Every try eating raw, unground grain? Bleah.' When i was a kid, I loved eating grain sorgum right out of the bin.

  93. Re:Agreed by delcielo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And while we're at it, don't forget to let your kid climb trees and play ball in the neighborhood, and be a kid.

    Don't schedule your child like they were a corporate executive under the mistaken belief that they're understimulated by normal life, and will be smarter if kept busier.

    Love your child, let them be children, and try not to program their lives for some ultimate goal.

    It's their life, not yours.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  94. If You Love the Children of the Future by Vagary · · Score: 1

    What kind of sick parent would not wish that his children have better opportunities than he had? Who would be so abusive as to deny his children a superior physiology?

    Granted, choline might have negative side effects that outweight the benefits, but in general it is natural to do everything we can to improve the lot of our offspring. To do otherwise is to fight against our genes and (for most of us) our memes. And we do so much to improve ourselves with our technology after birth that it is not a significant stretch to apply technology before birth.

    The only counter-argument I can conceive of is that stupidity is a cultural trait in the same way that some deaf parents are arguing that they should be allowed to try and have deaf children because they have a flourishing subculture. Considering the attacks on intelligence in the US media and highschools throughout the Western world, I might even buy it, but it's damn sad that you're promoting it.

    1. Re:If You Love the Children of the Future by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in general it is natural to do everything we can to improve the lot of our offspring.

      That was my point. Unfortunately too many parents nowadays seem to think that making their children smarter/nicer/better-behaved involves drugs and therapy rather than stimulation and involvement. Not everyone, possibly not even a majority, but an awfully high minority do.

      Considering the attacks on intelligence in the US media and highschools throughout the Western world, I might even buy it, but it's damn sad that you're promoting it.

      What, it's damn sad that I'm promoting parents involving themselves in educating their children, and that I consider it more important than rushing out and giving them every new drug/product that comes along? WTF?

      And we do so much to improve ourselves with our technology after birth that it is not a significant stretch to apply technology before birth.

      It is a bad stretch when we have no idea what the long term effects of that technology are. I'd even go so far as to call it stupid to do so. Fer fucks' sake, raising reasonably intelligent, decent kids does not require umpteen drugs, supplements, special ed, uber-ed, or whatever. It mostly requires that you be the example they learn from, and that you spend time with them. How the hell do you think it was done before all this extra shit was available? Via Voodoo?

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    2. Re:If You Love the Children of the Future by Vagary · · Score: 1

      I guess we agree on the ends, and just differ on the means: I think that parents should do everything in their power to improve their children, and I make no distinction between parenting skills and drugs, I am only concerned with the end result. I'd even go so far as to say that some parents should take a risk with their children, whether using untested techniques or less-than-fully understood drugs (as to completely understand the effects of a drug takes two full generations). Evolution works by taking risks, although usually very small ones.

      We have failed if our children are only as intelligent as we are.

    3. Re:If You Love the Children of the Future by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I understand your point. However, raising kids is not evolution, and my view on it is that there is far too much emphasis on medication and far too little emphasis on taking responsibility for raising your kids (in this country at least, not sure about elsewhere). Having seen what drugs like Ritalin are doing to the kids of friends of mine, it's something that really pisses me off. I've also heard far too many stories about doctors prescribing this or that to parents who simply can't handle their children, because they aren't willing to try to understand them or to change their stuck-in-the-mud viewpoints about the world.

      We have failed if our children are only as intelligent as we are.

      I'm sorry, but that's bullshit. If your kid grows up mentally and emotionally balanced, and makes a good happy life for themselves, what fucking difference does it make how intelligent they are, or how much they "contribute to society" - which is usually what most proponents of enhancing the intelligence of kids mean by their propondering? Have all the child psychs and drugs and all this shit really made kids' lives better?

      Look, man, I grew up before this country got overrun by child psychologists and behaviorial modification via prescribed biochemistry. To be perfectly honest I think kids back then were a helluva lot more well off than they are now (and I'm also talking about our fucked up educational system). It used to be anathema to even *consider* letting your kids takes drugs that would alter their behavior :)

      Anyway, thanks for some reasonable discourse...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:If You Love the Children of the Future by jnicholson · · Score: 1
      raising kids is not evolution
      Surely having and raising kids is the only component of evolution? What else is there?
      We have failed if our children are only as intelligent as we are.
      I'm sorry, but that's bullshit.
      In evolutionary terms, if our children aren't in any way superior, we have failed. If the previous poster chooses to believe that intelligence is an important factor in terms of "fitness", then the statement is perfectly fair.

      There are many medications that aren't known to be safe for use during pregnancy, because their effects on a developing child aren't known. Those effects will never be known, because no parent will take the risk of using them unless they have no choice. This new supplement is a less extreme case. Who's going to experiment with their children? A fairly small number of people. Over a very large number of generations, the effects will become known.

      Is this a good thing or a bad thing? I have no idea. We can either be people who are willing to risk the health of our individual children for the "betterment" of the race, or we can be restricted to whatever changes evolution comes up with for us on its own, never using our intelligence to speed up the process.

      Some people will decide one way, and some the other. Just like democracy, really. And about as well-informed.

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  95. I for one.... by Alan · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new baby rat overlords.

  96. Centrum by eegad · · Score: 1

    Ok, but how long until I can get choline in my Centrum? Wait... do I take Centrum? I forget.

  97. Seems like I'd better update my spam filters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... real quick with a few new keywords !

  98. choline = fat rat brains by monsterzero2003 · · Score: 1

    So why should I feed my "in utero" children fat rat brain food? Plenty fat rat brained humans around as it is. Pathetic. What you should be worried about is if your kid has 10 fingers and 10 toes. "super baby" psychosis is rampant. Poor shumuck parents who never achieved anything wat to grow a super baby for bragging rights. Good way to spawn a miserable child. The other kids want to make sand castles and your kid wants to talk quantum mechanics

  99. Mod Parent Down by Saltation · · Score: 1

    If this is not a troll, the poster doesn't have a clue what he's talking about

    1. Re:Mod Parent Down by BWJones · · Score: 1

      Why don't you expound on just what is being mischaracterized or what you feel is not being correctly presented? Come on now, let's hear it.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:Mod Parent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking the parent posters credentials, I would be more inclined to believe him than you. Ive been reading your other posts and you come off sounding like a complete fraud.

  100. I just injected some chlorine by pelsmith · · Score: 1

    Got it from my cleaning closet.

    Me not feel any smarter atall.

  101. Re:Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
    I am neither a sociologist nor a statistician, but I don't find Dorfman's argument very convincing. It's nothing but a personal attack against Herrnstein's credibility. But to play devil's advocate, let's assume Dorfman has a point and Herrnstein had a political agenda in writing the book. Even if Herrnstein's theories and analyses are entirely unsound (which I personally doubt), there's still the fact that the disparities he tried to explain do exist. Or to take it a step further, say he made up all his statistics and there are no disparities (again, something my personal experience leads me to very strongly doubt.) Thanks to the firestorm of controversy surrounding the book, it will be many years before any respected researcher will dare to re-examine Herrnstein's statistics or collect any of their own. Meanwhile, policy makers may be neglecting very real social problems.

    My point: talking heads shouldn't get involved in science.

  102. Re:Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    How about the disparities between social classes and ethnic groups?

    That's one of the things I found most interesting about the method presented here. The usual Gattica scenario points to only the upper class being able to have access to the technology to produce modified offspring, but in this case most anyone in the western world could afford to take a chance with it. Choline's pretty cheap, to the point where even someone on minimum wage could manage to use it for nine months with a little planning. Something I'd find interesting, is if in fact human use took off more in lower class enviroments with parents grasping for anything to increase their kids chance of getting out.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  103. I'm holding up a finger. Can you guess which one? by MacFury · · Score: 1
    meanwhile, just enjoy doing the find-a-words in your new-found "English" class.

    You are two things; insolent and clueless. :-)

    My gifted class was much more than just an advanced English class. And yes, I did miss out on quite a bit because of the budget cuts. The world has social strata and that is a fact. I see no need to be coupled with children who don't want to learn.

    Furthermore, while public school provides nothing intrinsically necessary to succeed in life, it sure does help. Try getting any decent job without a high school diploma. It's not that easy. There are major stigmata involved. Sure, you could start your own business, but that takes money. I was not born of rich parents.

  104. Eat More Product P! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget about choline! Eat More Product P!
    Product P, the Pink Protien Power Powder Produce from Powdered Pigs!

    Product P is guarenteed to give you a Parasitic Orgasm or your money back!

  105. Nitpick... by benjamindees · · Score: 1

    now we know that chlorine will alter
    I think that was choline. Don't feed anyone chlorine, even if it's just a little bit.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    1. Re:Nitpick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was choline. Don't feed anyone chlorine, even if it's just a little bit.

      What I get for typing faster than I'm thinking.

      So sue me. ;=)

      AT

    2. Re:Nitpick... by alexo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >> I think that was choline. Don't feed anyone chlorine, even if it's just a little bit.
      >
      > What I get for typing faster than I'm thinking.


      Your mom should have taken Cholin supplements...

  106. The Scientific Method by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    What's disturbing here is that while they've documented the physiological effects on the rat's brains, they didn't do any follow-up studies as to how this actually effected the rat's capacity to learn, or any of the effects on the rat's behavior.

    That's not disturbing, that's lazy.

    Baby steps: First you kill the super rats you created and you chop up their giant brains.
    Takes notes while you do it. Publish, wait for more money to show up.
    Then you either hightail it out to Mexico and live like a king on your stolen grant money, letting the rest of the scientific community recreate and then raise uber-rats of their own to see if they can be thought to pilot military vehicles over rough terrain autonomously. Or you buckle down and you do it yourself.

    If you're not happy with the speed at wich they are getting their research done, dope up your own rats, see for yourself.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  107. Re:Great. Get ready for the flame war on CNN... by Catamaran · · Score: 1
    If your point is that talking heads shouldn't get involved in science, then I somewhat agree.

    My point is that Murray and Herrnstein got just what they wanted: plenty of publicity, and adulation by like-minded racist conservatives. If they had wanted a scientific discussion they would have submitted their work to scientific journals.

    Your claim that respected researchers have been scared off is just silly. There are hundreds of scientists exploring these topics every day.

    --
    Test 1 2 3 4
  108. Geeks in Public Schools by Psychochild · · Score: 1

    A public school teacher once explained it to us (paraphrasing from memory), "The goal of public education is not to raise the highest even higher, but to raise the lowest to an acceptable level." Translated: The goal is to get the "slow" kids to society-contributing levels, not help the smart get smarter. In cold, logical terms this makes sense; a group of at least average-performing people is better than a super-genius or two in terms of benefit to society.

    In my opinion and personal experience, the best thing a super-smart kid can do is to get self-motivated to learn on his or her own. I wish I had been encouraged more to learn on my own. (I was in Talented and Gifted classes when I was young, but I was too distractable to really get into them. ;) It wasn't until I got into programming in high school that I really started to come into my own. Interestingly enough, it was my interest in the computer games the grandparent post criticizes that really got me interested in programming. I'd breeze through my BASIC assignments and learn more about graphics manipulation in order to create a cool game.

    My love of gaming really helped me in my life. I got into programming in high school, I got into creative writing, I made great friends with D&D players in college despite my introvert tendencies, I found a great significant other that enjoys gaming (her and I often play together), I got the motivation to find a job I enjoyed in the game industry, and I was given the impetus to start my own game development company. All from my love of gaming.

    In the end, find something you enjoy and start learning what makes that "tick"; for me, it was video games, and I learned how different playing games was from developing games. Learn as much as you can about it and get into the deep details. Apply your intellect to that pursuit and you might be surprised where it takes you.

    My thoughts,

    --
    Brian "Psychochild" Green
    MMO developer's blog
  109. From that Prenatal Sound Therapy link... by Slinky+Saves+the+Wor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Through my communication with him telepathically and through his delay in arrival I was able to attend a music conference that was very important to me at that time." (Emphasis mine)

    After that I'm uncertain whether I believe anything this person has to say.

    --
    I do not moderate.
  110. Shark cartilage as a treatment for cancer by nukebuddy · · Score: 1
    Shark cartilage has indeed been rejected as a possible treatment for cancer.

    There are plenty of recent studies confirmingit is an effective treatment for cancer.

    Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2002 Dec;4(6):521-5.
    Sharks: a potential source of antiangiogenic factors and tumor treatments.
    Cho J, Kim Y.
    Department of Microbiology, Pukyong National University, Pusan 608-737, Korea.

    Since angiogenesis is a key feature of tumor growth, inhibiting this process is one way to treat cancer. Cartilage is a natural source of material with strong antiangiogenic activity. This report reviews knowledge of the anticancer properties of shark cartilage and clinical information on drugs such as neovastat and squalamine. Because their entire endoskeleton is composed of cartilage, sharks are thought to be an ideal source of angiogenic and tumor growth inhibitors. Shark cartilage extract has shown antiangiogenic and antitumor activities in animals and humans. The oral administration of cartilage extract was efficacious in reducing angiogenesis. Purified antiangiogenic factors from shark cartilage, such as U-995 and neovastat (AE-941), also showed antiangiogenic and antitumor activity. AE-941 is under phase III clinical investigation. Squalamine, a low molecular weight aminosterol, showed strong antitumor activity when combined with chemotherapeutic materials. The angiogenic tissue inhibitor of metalloprotease 3 (TIMP-3) and tumor suppressor protein (snm23) genes from shark cartilage were cloned and characterized.

    PMID: 14961226


    -nukebuddy
  111. Karma whoring, here's the entire book by Slinky+Saves+the+Wor · · Score: 1

    Brave New World. An excellent book, I might add.

    --
    I do not moderate.
  112. Oh boy.. here we go... by gmby · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our giant intelligent rat overlords.....

    Or

    I for one welcome our hyper-intelligent kids soon to be our leaders in office.

    --
    I don't want a pickle; I just want a Motor-Cycle! A four foot cop arrived with a five foot gun!
  113. Straw man argument by DrMorpheus · · Score: 1
    So, you have just made the golden argument against dietary supplements and herbal remedies.
    Firstly, how exactly did you get that from what you quoted? It doesn't state anything about unknown quantities. What a classic example of a straw man argument.

    Secondly, you obviously are completely out of touch with the herbal supplement industry because they are regulated with respect to claims made on their labels. And since all "Standardized" herbel supplements DO state the amount of each active and inactive ingredient in them people who take herbel supplements ARE informed about what your taking.

    Thirdly, you completely missed his point. He was satyrizing the typical non-argument against herbal supplements. Namely, invent a worse case senario of someone in a vulnerable state taking HUGH amounts of the supplement and then imply or state outright that this is the typical scenario.

    No, it's ignorant scare-mongering. Frankly, other than truth in labeling and advertising issues all levels of government should stay out of regulating what I put in MY body. If we do not control ourselves then we really control nothing.

    Oh, and just for the record, I take no herbel or dietary supplements.

    --
    Debunking the "59 Deceits"
  114. Oh woe is you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a difference between my generation, and my fahters generation. I was born as a mistake[...]My parents divoreced with I was 5.

    Welcome to the club. This doesn't make you special or painful or painfully special. Neither does saying it.

    You seem to have a well self-examined and notably high self-assessment. Relative to the people you're trying very hard to distance yourself from, that's not much of an accomplishment.

    Many kids in my generation are in pain like I was, and my generation will be the most fantastically screwed up and fantastically smart of all humanity.

    Oh, boo hoo hoo. Perhaps if you tried harder, you'd actually have a vision of the future that wasn't exhausted by what you probably think of as your father's generation in that epoch called the 60s that happened along shortly after the Devonian Period.

    Sorry. I'm not feeling your pain. In fact, you come off like a whiny little shit. The entire point you're trying to make is that you've suffered so horribly for so long that you're now some kind of Nietzsche-esque wet dream of what people ought to be and that it's been brought about solely by your suffering and that you and Wonder Woman and Captain Planet and Eminem all the other super cool people will hole up somewhere and recite Coleridge's Kubla Khan to each other at night because TV is just too demeaning.

    While I'm sure that's cute, it's also incomplete. The punchline of your recycled perspective is either the hippy-dippy activism of the 60s (which I'm sure you're not into since Nintendo wasn't around then) or the finally sanctimonious and badly written, preachy horseshit of Thus Spake Zarathustra.

    People who really are truly like what you hype to yourself that you are don't flop around making a mess of it, no matter how much of a challenge to the Uebermensch you might think it might be to do so.

    Here are you choices:

    [1] Give up the Nintendo
    [2] Start a cult
    [3] STFU
    [4] learn how you know when you know something and use it do something

    I dare you to try choose any combination of the above without resorting to a depth of feeling comparable only to realultimatepower.com. This kind of shit is only funny when you intend it to be.

    It ought to be easy, Little Miss Feel-My-Pain. Your call.

  115. Maybe... by Katherin · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...we should try it on bill gates before reaching a decision

    -Katherin
    Indian Programmer :)

  116. other uses by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I've seen ephedra as an ingredient in another somewhat "major" TCM remedy.

    Dit Da Jow (also sometimes called 'hit fall wine' in English)

    there's a bunch of other herbs as well mixed in alcohol, meant to be applied and rubbed externally on bruises, ligaments, sprains, over broken bones, etc. to help them heal quicker.

    recipes vary greatly from one herbalist to the next though.

    I've used it to treat a partially torn plantar fascia, apparently a common tennis injury. A good number of internet sources say that even the smallest tear of the plantar fasciae can take a minimum of 6 months to heal properly.

    I rubbed dit da jow 3-4 times a day on the black & purple swelling, and within a month there was no trace or feeling left of injury, and I was able to resume my sport activities in full.

  117. Small correction by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

    You don't get karma on +Funny moderations because Taco hates Funny. You do lose it though when it is modded down from +5 Funny to +4 Funny.

  118. Not a chemist - It's his lucky day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "
    I'm with Mr. Jones on this one.
    "

    Mr. Jones - put a wiggle in your stride.
    Loosen up! I believe he'll be all right.
    Changing clothes - now he's got ventilated slacks.
    Bouncing off the wall - Mr. Jones is back!

    - The Talking Heads

    (actual lyrics may vary)