Slashdot Mirror


A Babe in Tuxland

Joe Barr writes "This is the kind of story that WagEd and MS would love to see in one of their astroturf campaigns. But this story is real grassroots, with a real Sysadmin writing it and a real granddaughter as the babe using Linux. A sweet tale, with tips on Linux for kids." Newsforge and Slashdot are both part of OSDN.

507 comments

  1. Whoops. by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tux babies, not Tux babes


    -Colin

    1. Re:Whoops. by subk · · Score: 0

      Ya' know, it's really not too surprising when you consider the implied analogy in TFA's title.

      --
      Now, if you'll excuse me, I have backups to corrupt.
    2. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! You know the only real open source babe is the divine Ceren!

      Fact: babes do not use Linux, they use BSD.

    3. Re:Whoops. by JoeCommodore · · Score: 4, Informative

      The title is a play on words from "Babes in Toyland" - a Victor Herbert operetta from 1903. ...of course, the best version was the film with Laurel and Hardy.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    4. Re:Whoops. by hummer357 · · Score: 1

      Man...

      the mentioning of a 'babe' with the article sure wil give a good slashdotting load to the newsforge servers!

      -- run, forrest, run!!

      h357

    5. Re:Whoops. by swb · · Score: 1

      She needs a stylist, badly.

      I'm all in favor of a natural look, but that pale, straight-haired look doesn't really do much for me. It reminds me of tedious academic types with too many cats.

    6. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you just described me. Well no cats and hopefully not tedious.

      Does the pale, straight-haired, academic type do anything for anyone here??

    7. Re:Whoops. by Mateito · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry if its been, but I thought somebody would have posted this link already.

    8. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently it is of utmost importance to get a linux babe. Now. In black latex, all over.

      Any volunteers?

    9. Re:Whoops. by missing_hed · · Score: 1

      how typically slashdot. i had no problem reading the article itself, but the "babe" link is slashdotted.

      ~hed~

    10. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely. But not if she uses BSD. How anyone could stand a girl who would let proprietary projects copy her code I just don't understand.

      GNU/chicks forever!

    11. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! Not whoops. Mod up, please.

    12. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the mentioning of a 'babe' with the article sure wil give a good slashdotting load to the newsforge servers!

      Not only that but it means the inevitable smoking of Ceren's servers.

      Whooops, there it went!

    13. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to hear that, enjoy this one with Ceren instead. HTT

    14. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      She's just a model. Ceran is the only true BSD chick!

    15. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some random kiddie pseudo-porn "adopted" by BSD perverts. Boy, girl, there's no difference to those sickos. Very inappropriate in a story about 4 year olds using Linux.

    16. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the pale, straight-haired, academic type do anything for anyone here??

      Depends on the girl. In general, you've described my ideal woman.. but in specific, that Ceren chick does absolutely nothing for me.

      If you want a specific answer on you, post a pic :o)

    17. Re:Whoops. by swb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's a look that can be made to work, but it really takes the right clothes, accessories and makeup. And you have to do a little *something* with the hair to give a little bit of style. Just a long mop on top isn't enough.

    18. Re:Whoops. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight. A BSD chick can be used freely, and perhaps kept proprietary with a few changes, whereas a GNU chick has to be shared with everybody?

  2. Sick! by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, how many people here were expecting someone, you know, kinda hot?

    SHE'S FOUR YEARS OLD! HAVE YOU NO DECENCY ?!

    -roy

    1. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that all the hot chicks use BSD!

    2. Re:Sick! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Fat???

      What have you been drinking?

      She's a beautiful healthy looking young woman, that's what she is.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    3. Re:Sick! by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      He probably thinks this is hot.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...because there's nothing hotter than a girl with acne and a big sore on her foot.

    5. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's a beautiful healthy looking young woman

      Healthy looking - yes.

      Beautiful?

      Ehrm, no. I think 'Average' would be the most complimentary thing you could say about her.

    6. Re:Sick! by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Well, I think she's beautiful :)

      And she's a hell of a lot more attractive than some silicone-pumped anorexic "super"-model.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    7. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attractive; yes. Beautiful is simply an overstatement. Then again, who am I to say that? Beautiful is likely different in my eyes than yours.

    8. Re:Sick! by the+gnat · · Score: 3, Funny

      Goddamnit, I clicked on the link expecting photos of some sorority girl in a halter top and cutoffs, probably in the middle of an all-night coding session. Or, better yet, a group of them wearing pajamas and playing LAN games. Admit it, you've all had the same fantasy.

    9. Re:Sick! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      I was more afraid that they were talking about that "Linus in speedos" thing, again.

      --
      What?
    10. Re:Sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chubby hippie in a dump" were the words that immediately sprang to mind.
      Yikes.

  3. Mission by Daemonik+CyCow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Man, I love this. This is the kind of thing I dream about at night, this is total evangelist fodder (can that be used in a good way?)

    1. Re:Mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dream of four year old children at night? That's just sick, man!

    2. Re:Mission by B'Trey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, this is warm and cute and cuddly and completely precious. It's also complete and utter bullshit. Not that I'm saying it's not true - I certainly assume that it is true in regards to the facts of the situation. Howver, the conclusions it tries to draw are completely unrelated to the facts. It's a snow job.

      The basic interface between MS and Linux is essentially identical. It's point and click. There's only so much variation you can have. And yes, a child can learn to point and click on Linux just as well as they can Windows.

      But when people say Linux is difficult, they don't mean that it's difficult to figure out how to start a program, how to type text into a dodcument, or how to log on to the system. They mean that it's difficult to configure a printer, to setup the network, to install the driver for that new wireless card, etc.

      I've been using Linux for over ten years, and it has made tremendous strides. An average user can sit down and install Mandrake or SuSe or Red Hat without difficulty. They can fire up Open Office and type out a letter or open Mozilla and browse the web. They can do all of these things without difficulty - IF everything works right. The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows. That's what people mean when they say Linux is difficult to use, and four year old girls, no matter how cute and cuddly, do nothing to address that.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    3. Re:Mission by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who's done his fair share of windows admin work (10 years, 3000+ users and PC's), I can tell you that the same is VERY true of Windows. With the exception of device support, which is unparalleled in Windows, there are just as many times when the shit hits the fan, and there's no quick solution in Windows, as there is in Linux.

    4. Re:Mission by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      They generally do mean that it will be complicated to do they simple daily jobs involving point and click and are generally terrified by any configuration or material even on Windows. You have no idea how many people ask the technician to install/configure the material for them when they buy it.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    5. Re:Mission by Oblio · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows.

      I don't know... when I'm diagnosing a friends problem because "things don't work right" in windows, maybe a quarter to a half of the time I end up with "time to reinstall"... The WORST I have in linux is "you compiled your kernel wrong".

      I think I'd rather debug a freak linux problem than a freak windows problem any day.

      That said, my problems with linux come from when you want to do something relatively simple (printer sharing comes to mind) and it becomes exceedingly difficult because there is no clear, concise documented method to get it done. (Note that I found a document that WASN'T the standard HOWTO that walked me through this recently, so I'm not saying that this particular problem is intractable)

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    6. Re:Mission by Magada · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ah. Well. Allow me to dissent, please. The breaking point for Windows is also hardware support. It's just that not many vendors are crazy enough to issue new hardware w/out also providing Windows drivers. The essential word here is "new". Did you ever try to install some "legacy" hardware in a WinXP box? Methinks the Mac people have gotten that part right, while also achieving total customer lock-in. IBM does same with their "big iron" products.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    7. Re:Mission by b12arr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right. My four year old can already configure a printer, setup a network and install drivers for her new wireless card in Windows since it's so easy. So, it must be Linux thats giving her issues. I'll go unload it when I get home.

    8. Re:Mission by div_2n · · Score: 1

      The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows.

      By what metric?

      Quick rebuttal story. Doing consulting work for an auto-parts factory, I ran across a strange phenomenon where a third party app suddenly broke on a bunch of systems. After racking my brain and chasing down strange error messages for days on end, I found the culprit.

      How? I had to install and run a very obscure program that monitors all registry calls so you can see what a program is doing. After pouring over the logs for hours I figured it out. The program was calling for an ODBC information entry that had moved.

      Why did it move? An automatic update pushed by Novel Groupwise installed something that altered some settings. How did I determine that? By setting up a fresh system and updating manually until the app broke.

      The other day, my Red Hat Fedora Core 2 Test 1 system began behaving badly. Turned out to be a problem with an RPM that was installed. How did I figure that? Rollback updates until the system worked. Yeah, that was very hard. Then it hit me--there was no such rollback option on those Windows machines.

    9. Re:Mission by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I'm something of a Linux newbie, and have been pleasantly surprised by how easy it is to get stuff working.

      Less stuff works out of the box than with Windows--that's a given, since hardware manufacturers can't sell anything that doesn't work out of the box with Windows.

      However, nearly *everything* can be solved with a quick google. Today I googled "linux touchpad drivers" and had tap-clicking installed in ten minutes by following the links, downloading a tarball, and following the instructions.

    10. Re:Mission by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1

      Amen! I'm also a Windows admin, who runs both Windows and Linux boxes at home (although I'm admittedly a Linux n00b), and I must say that the people who I admin for a living would be no more clueless on Linux machines than they already are on their Windows machines.

    11. Re:Mission by ZapoAM · · Score: 1

      That's what people mean when they say Linux is difficult to use, and four year old girls, no matter how cute and cuddly, do nothing to address that. Damn straight. The four year old boys, on the other hand, they're the innovative ones.

    12. Re:Mission by sjgm · · Score: 1

      Then it hit me--there was no such rollback option on those Windows machines.

      What about System Restore? Sure, it's only available on Windows ME and above but surely that would have solved the problem.

    13. Re:Mission by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Windows has such a feature called "System Restore" or even getting a 3rd party program "Norton Ghost" would solve your issues.

      Also ... for someone trying to keep many systems the same all the time (only doing simple work like word processing or the such) install a program called Deepfreeze and it can "freeze" your drives so when you reboot it goes back to a safe setting. This of course can be disabled to install new things.


      If you where to use ONLY Certified Products for windows im sure your issues would happen alot less. Installing Kazaa and all these "dirty" 3rd party programs will eventually lead to issues.

      In my long time of fixing machines I noticed the "triple combo" I like to use while fixing my machine.

      Norton Windoctor
      Lavasoft Ad-Aware (or somthing of the kind)
      Norton Speed disk (not really needed but does make some speed improvements)

      These 3 will usually fix a machine to the point where it is usable. Removing some of the slowness and such. Heck it made a Windows ME install last almost 2 years doing it weekly.

      Windows XP SP2 solves ALOT of these issues. Microsoft has made you almost FORCED to keep a AV scanner running , Firewall and Automatic Windows updates. If you don't have one of these running the new "security center" will bitch at you till you do. The new Windows XP firewall is similar to Nortons where you can set what programs are to have access to the net. (unlike the old firewal which basicly blocked all ports and made direct connections almost impossible). The new automatic update wizard is also very impressive and Windows update has a much cleaner GUI. I can't wait till that one comes out in final.

      It's no so much the Operating system as it is the user of it. You install the wrong shit, stuff will break.

      Im done rambling :)

    14. Re:Mission by mwood · · Score: 1

      It depends on what "difficult" means to you.

      I find MS Windows more difficult to fix than Linux. On Linux there are not 69 layers of software in my way, each dedicated to protecting me from finding out what really happened. On Linux I can grab the controls and try stuff; on MS Windows there's nothing to try except "install it again".

      Installing a driver for that new wireless card? On MS Windows: click here, click there, click everywhere, futz with wizards for five minutes, maybe it works. On Linux: cp, insmod, ifconfig, working.

      I *have* seen stuff on Linux that is as hard to use as MS Windows. It's always stuff that tries to make Linux more like MS Windows.

    15. Re:Mission by crizh · · Score: 1

      care to post a link?

      --
      Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
    16. Re:Mission by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "And yes, a child can learn to point and click on Linux just as well as they can Windows."

      The difference, of course, being the ability to point at mummy's data, and click on the delete button...

    17. Re:Mission by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "In my long time of fixing machines I noticed the "triple combo" I like to use while fixing my machine."

      "Norton Windoctor"

      " Lavasoft Ad-Aware (or somthing of the kind)"

      " Norton Speed disk (not really needed but does make some speed improvements)"

      Yeah, but, after spending all that money for the OS, Windows, wouldn't you expect all the functionality to already be there IN the OS, rather than having to buy all these other 3rd party applications? For the money you pay out for Windows lic., I'd think all these tools would be included with the product if they're needed for the continuous functioning, recovery, and performance of said OS.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Mission by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1
      Personally whether it is security, usability, or capablity, I think it is about time that the hardware manufacturers/service providers start recieving some more heat. Whether it is windows, linux, or Mac the manufacturers should be providing support for all of them, and when something does not work they should provide some help in fixing it. If manufacturers are not going to provide drivers, they should at the very least, open up there reference information and give someone else a shot at making them.

      Additionally, how many times have you sent an email with a multi-part question to a tech support for a problem and they come back with a one line worthless answer? Yet when you post questions to a forum you get very detailed and competent information from a person who is just helping you out for the sake of kindness.

      I have also recently come to the conclusion that when it comes to security, both Windows and Linux recieve too much blame. I realize that if Linux had the most users, then it would have been targeted by all of the worms/viruses that have been going around. I fixed a lot of freinds/families computers who had systems with broadband and modem connections with not even a NAT firewall. They were not kept up to date with antivirus, windows updates, had no software firewall, etc..., etc... The computer manufacturers and ISPs should have provided these folks with better training, manuals, and protection features before allowing them to get on the internet and become spam hosts that devalue the entire internet for everyone.

    19. Re:Mission by Oblio · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think this is the one that ended up being the most help (I had problems getting the steps in the general printing howto to payoff for me)...

      debian windows shared printing

      Make sure to force the CUPS sharing into RAW mode...

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    20. Re:Mission by Oblio · · Score: 1

      I just don't know if the manufacturers are in the position to provide the level of technical support you are talking about... When you post a problem to a technical forum, its being read by many people who have specializations in different feilds. The chances are, someone is going to specialize in a field that covers your problem. Contrast that to technical support, where your call is answered by the person who got lucky and picked you up off the queue. Much lower odds of specific knowledge... the best you can hope for is a situation where the support reps share knowledge AND are willing to take the time to search out speicific knowledge in your case.

      Remember, the original poster was talking about the "hard" problems... not that your joystick cable was unplugged, but that you have a rogue driver that occaisionally raises its interrupt level too high, or that a program placed a bad shared dll on a system when it installed, and the result is intermittent system failure.

      I think we're largely screwed, in our quest for quality, unless companies become liable for their products, and I'm nervous about that from a public policy perspective (I wouldn't post my code if I was going to open myself up to legal liability because of it).

      The status quo isn't _so_ bad for the people willing to sink the time into research... it just sucks for the folks who have lives.

      --
      Pax -- Ob
    21. Re:Mission by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      From my experience, the main difference in this area is that in Windows, things rarely go badly wrong. If they go a little askew, then windows will generally be able to fix them without much hassle.
      In Linux, these things such as setting up networks and installing large bits of software often go nastily awry and require a large dredge through the requirements tree, or a dive into the kernel. However, were something such as this to go wrong with windows, you would often have no such things to turn to - you are not told what's going wrong (generally) when a program won't start, or a device won't work. You cannot, therefore, fix it.
      So, although these problems are more frequent in Linux, there is almost always a way to fix one, albeit often an obscure and time-consuming one. Without much more experience I cannot say whether, in the end, the Linux method is easier, but for me at least, it is definitely not worse.

      However, I believe that there is a misconception that it is incredibly difficult to do these basic tasks on a Linux system. Since Aunt Tillie doesn't need to set up a network or install vast quantities of software (She may need to set up a printer), it's worth noting the results of this.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    22. Re:Mission by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      What do you mean no quick solution? I've gotten my "Format and reinstall" speeds below an hour!

    23. Re:Mission by Nebu · · Score: 1

      My four year old can already configure a printer, setup a network and install drivers for her new wireless card in Windows since it's so easy.

      Actually, she probably could. Plug the USB cable from the printer into the computer (she can just try every port until she finds one that fits, 4 year olds can solve those "fit the block into the hole with the same shape" type problems right?), and WindowsXP says "Your printer is installed and ready to use." When I tried installing a printer on Linux, it involved selecting the printer's manufacturer and model from a drop down list, which would require reading, which a 4 year old might not be capable of.

      Plug in the network cable, and Window's default behaviour is to assign you with a default workgroup name and to "magically" obtain an IP automatically. Last time I checked, most linux distribution's default action is to ask you what your local host name and domain names are, without even telling you if they should be the same across all computers on the network, or they shouldn't be the same across all computers on the network. When you try to tell Linux to get you an IP automatically, it'll ask you for the IP of a DHCP server. Damned if my 4 year old knows what a DHCP server is and what its IP address migth be.

      For wireless cards, you've got me, 'cause I haven't tried installing a wireless card in Windows yet, so I don't know what aids it might provide, but I'd imagine it'd feel just as "automatic" as the previous two cases.

    24. Re:Mission by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      As someone who's done his fair share of windows admin work (10 years, 3000+ users and PC's), I can tell you that the same is VERY true of Windows. With the exception of device support, which is unparalleled in Windows, there are just as many times when the shit hits the fan, and there's no quick solution in Windows, as there is in Linux.

      This is so true, but I feel I should add one more thing: In Windows, when it doesn't work, you're hosed.

      After you've tried all the different drivers you can get your hands on and that new foobar card still doesn't work, that's it. There's nothing you can do. The only people who can fix the problem for you are the card manufacturer and MS.

      Under Linux, when the video input on my Gainward Geforce 2 TI VIVO Golden Sample (a fairly rare card) didn't work, I could send an email to the guy who actually wrote the driver and after and email or two, it actually worked.

      I'd also much rather edit plaintext config files than dork with some fragile, proprietary registry.

      Here's anther example for you:
      My win2k laptop doesn't undock properly because I have some stupid parallel port dongle. What can I do under windows? Get rid of the hardware or deal with it. I can't edit undock.sh to add a line "rmmod stupiddongle". (Or whatever the proper way to handle it under Linux would be)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    25. Re:Mission by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      The problem is that things don't always work right, and when they don't work right, getting them fixed is usually much more difficult on Linux than it is on Windows.

      That may have been true at one time, and it may be true now for some distros, but certainly not all. Since Suse 8.0 I've found Linux MUCH easier Windows.

      IMNSHO, a better comparison would be to the Mac. Stuff just works, as long as it's supported.

      The thing is, though, how often do regular people have to deal with this kind of stuff? Hardly ever, and most of the time when they do run into problems they call somebody who knows computers rather than deal with it themselves regardless of OS! For that reason, the conclusions the article draws are NOT bullshit.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    26. Re:Mission by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      I think users have become so fed up with the hassles of computers that they are ready to pay for quality. I just fixed my new neighbors computer. They have paid $90 over the last two months for broadband that they have not been able to use because their computer was suffering from virus and spyware infestation.

    27. Re:Mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't edit undock.sh to add a line "rmmod stupiddongle".

      Y'suppose that 4 year old kid would have instantly known to edit undock.sh?

  4. Why logout? by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Funny
    We were all surprised when on the second day K.D. asked her mom to log out so that she could have her login.
    Couldn't she have just used su?
    1. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Or an suid exploit? After all, script kiddies are getting younger and younger these days.

    2. Re:Why logout? by szo · · Score: 1

      actually, there is a nice button in kde that lets you start a new X session.

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
    3. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That poor girl, she's gonna be an outcast because she doesnt use windows. At school, she'll be disadvantaged. "Windows?" she will ask. "What is that?". All the other normal people will make fun of her.

      So, for your children sake, use Windows. Its the only socially acceptable platform available. If she was 16 and 200 pounds with glasses and terrible acne, sure, give her linux, or maybe even an apple (for the alternative lifestylers among us).

      Please, think of the Children. Use Windows.

    4. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best. Troll. EVVVAAR!!!

    5. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At school, she'll be disadvantaged. "Windows?" she will ask. "What is that?". All the other normal people will make fun of her.

      Until the day comes when all the other kids get marked down for not turning in their papers on time, since their computers got knocked out by a virus.

    6. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Until the day comes when all the other kids get marked down for not turning in their papers on time, since their computers got knocked out by a virus.

      Then KD, due to her better grades and intellectual superiority, will become popular, right? Right?!?!

    7. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that may be true, but the early start, possesive attitude and years of bullying is going to turn the kid into the biggest, baddest, scares-marines-on-a-dark-night BOFH you've ever seen.

      Be afraid.

    8. Re:Why logout? by wilper · · Score: 1

      http://www.laecherli.ch/Documents/scared.pdf

    9. Re:Why logout? by Thavius · · Score: 1

      You forgot: .. to turn the kid into the biggest, baddest, scares-marines-on-a-dark-night BOFH you've ever seen. Then she turns 10.

    10. Re:Why logout? by JupiterP5 · · Score: 1

      Nah, she was the one that wrote the virus.

    11. Re:Why logout? by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I maybe off-topic but I'm convinced that kids (big and small) pick on each other for whatever is different, if you're a different colour, height, weight, talk differently or have any other characteristic which the majority do not possess (intelligence??) then that will be used against you ... these parents are actually helping as being picked on for using Linux isn't so hard to cope with as being picked on for your hair colour, speech impediment or goofy teeth. IMHO.

      So suck on that you ginger-braniac-four-eyed-northerner ...

    12. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That poor girl, she's gonna be an outcast because she doesnt use windows. At school, she'll be disadvantaged. "Windows?" she will ask. "What is that?". All the other normal people will make fun of her.

      No, If she's hot they'll end up installing linux too.

    13. Re:Why logout? by Nosf3ratu · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I've actually wondered how that will pan out with my own children. My fiance and I both use Linux, and our children certainly will as well. I just know we'll run into problems down the road when gradeschools start to implement more and more "Interactive (win32) CDroms" with their textbooks the way that Universities do. So, yeah, our kids will be outcasts, but they'll also probably be the only vegan straightedge kids in gradeschool.

      --
      The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori
    14. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then KD, due to her better grades and intellectual superiority, will become popular, right? Right?!?!
      You're mistaken, she'll become popular because of her better grades and Intellectual Property.
    15. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll be like Halloween with computers!

    16. Re:Why logout? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/but/and/

  5. I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by darthcamaro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like everyone else I've got alot of old hardware that Windoze won't run on - but you can run Open Office, Mozilla on top of KDE/GNOME on a Pentium I and it'll work for kids quite well. No need to upgrade and shell out additional cash. And hey KDE Games are GREAT for kids..and they're free!!!

    1. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 4, Funny
      No need to upgrade and shell out additional cash. And hey KDE Games are GREAT for kids..and they're free!!!

      Bah if that's they way you think you can raise kids, they're going to be ridiculed at school and your family will be branded as being poor. Way to screw up your kids' social status for years to come. Look, if you want to be a cool parent, shell out $3000 for the top of the line Alienware system with Windows XP Pro running on it. You will be the COOLEST parent on the block. Material wealth is very important to the social status of children and is second only to how good looking their family is.

    2. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Material wealth is very important to the social status of children and is second only to how good looking their family is.

      Only if you teach them to think like that....

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know what kind of P1 you have, but it's been my experience that modern linux distros (Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat) run like crap on anything less than a p2-333.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    4. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you teach them to think like that....

      Jeroen


      you're ugly aren't you.

    5. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by darthcamaro · · Score: 1

      if you strip down the kernel and get rid of some of the extra stuff - so long as you've got 128MB RAM you're laughing...

    6. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      What about the GUI? Mandrake's latest, even on 256 MB RAM, stutter steps on everything, sorry, I'm not buying it. I find BeOS runs much better on "modest" PCs.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    7. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. Are you using Karl Marx the commie or Richard Marx the pussy singer as Stallman's insult moniker?

    8. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you teach them to think like that.... JFC, you're such a self righteous dickwad that you completely missed the satire in the grandparent post, didn't you.

    9. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Red+Alastor · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd not let a child use a Windows box. Not only for the kid's mental health but because Windows can be easilly messed up, and it's a pain in the ass to frequently reformat/reinstall, especially if you are not the one who made it crawl. With Linux and a separated login it's a lot safer.

      You are really the typical Windows user aren't you ? It doesn't matter if the product is crappy as long as it looks good and everyone seems to use it.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    10. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      Gnome and KDE are dogs, granted. I tried 'em both on my lower end linux boxes. I also tried them on my newer machine, and they still ran like dogs (opengl apps, even with the accelerated nvidia driver, ran at less than 1 FPS).

      Switched to one of the other managers, fvwm, blackbox, twm, didn't really matter which. Did that and every machine was instantly snappy and responsive. So the issue isn't linux's speed really, it's the bloated software we call KDE and Gnome.

      I still use my Toshiba Libretto (pentium 166, 64mb memory) daily, and it is running redhat9. Never had any cause for complaint on it.

    11. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by NullProg · · Score: 1

      I have an old warhorse of a laptop, P150/64meg. It runs the latest SuSE 9 just fine.

      Hint, install only kde/gnome base libraries and whatever kde/gnome apps you want to use. Choose Window Maker/XFCE or some other lightweight desktop environment. Tastes great, less filling.

      Enjoy,

      --
      It's just the normal noises in here.
    12. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      but you can run Open Office, Mozilla on top of KDE/GNOME on a Pentium I and it'll work for kids quite well

      On a Pentium I? You must have patient kids. Mozilla, maybe. KDE/Gnome, unlikely, even with recent speed improvements in KDE 3.2 (don't have much experience with Gnome). But I can assume you have them running on an older version. OpenOffice, forget it. My wife ran OpenOffice on a Celeron 900MHz w/ 128MB RAM, and it got to the point where I just had to go out and buy her more RAM. I have a buddy who runs it on an older machine (PI or PII w/ 64MB RAM) and he says OpenOffice 1.1 takes 10 minutes to open, literally. He's also given up on KDE because it's too slow on this old machine. Both my wife and buddy are running with kernel 2.6.3. I'm not saying that they could run Windows XP on their machines (although my wife used to, and never really complained about speed), I'm just saying modern linux distributions can be very resource-intensive.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    13. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if the kids are raised by a status-aware dork with esteem issues (much like you apparently; $3000 to compensate for a small penis, mayhaps?). Children learn the values they are taught and repeatedly modeled.

    14. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Mantorp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A number of the kids' games I've loaded on my XP machine won't run properly unless logged in as admin.

    15. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My 8-year-old is a Linux zealot. He's got a login on both of my Linux boxes and is constantly asking to get "on his desktop" so he can play games, surf, and tweak the UI settings. He also constantly bitches about having to use his mom's computer (an XP machine) in daily use because it doesn't have cool games, etc.

    16. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by D-Cypell · · Score: 1

      Stab in the dark...

      Get beat up at school much?

    17. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by micromoog · · Score: 4, Funny
      I find BeOS runs much better on "modest" PCs.

      Yeah, OS's tend to run faster when you're not running any applications.

    18. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Krunch · · Score: 1

      I have a Pentium 133 with Debian Sarge on it running just fine. KDE is a bit slow and OOo takes ages to load but it's usable. More RAM wouldn't be bad tough.

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
    19. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "DeepFreeze" is a cool tool for stability; just get the system in working order, and then freeze it. Every time you turn it on, it will be as though nothing happened the last time you used it. Hard drive will be exactly as it was the day you froze it.

      It's awesome for public access terminals. Eliminates the need to reformat/reinstall, and virtually eliminates viral infections as well (because if infected, a simple reboot is all the cure needed).

    20. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Aww, I wanted to get a Libretto and toss BeOS on it. Would've made an awesome MP3 player for my car :)

    21. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by internewt · · Score: 1
      A number of the kids' games I've loaded on my XP machine won't run properly unless logged in as admin

      Hmm, what a surprise - badly written software.

      There's a couple of things you could try: Change the file permissions on the game directory to enable user's to be able to write to it. By default on NT etc., user's get read and execute on the \program files directory. I guess the game could be trying to update config info in the game's directory, and failing.

      Now this is probably BS. I believe that some copy protection works by changing the code on the fly. (This is based on something I read about AV, and how if AV looked for code changing as its being run, then it ould probably pick up CD copy protection as thats how it works). On the basis of this lame premis, I think that the user would need the debug priviledge. You can assign priviledges to a user or group though the local computer policy editor, start, run, gpedit.msc.

      Otherwise ask Jeeves :) . Or apply a no-CD crack.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    22. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      But kids will need to save stuff, may it be their progress in a game or a document they wrote.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    23. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      That's what removable media or NAS are for. You can also configure a second unfrozen partition; the benefit of this is that the Windows install won't ever be hosed, no matter how nasty the second drive gets ...

    24. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by mwood · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. My 1993-vintage DECpc LPx (i486SX 33mHz, 40mb) runs Linux, X and FVWM just fine and turns in quite respectable performance with the stuff I run. OTOH those integrated-desktop gadgets are slow even on an essentially idle dual Xeon 2gHz 2GB system.

    25. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      I have a pII/233 with 128 megs of ram, which runs at a decent clip.

      It runs a custom stripped down kernel, xfree 4.2, windowmaker, kopete, firefox and abiword.

      Yes, if you do a full run-of-the-mill desktop install, with a full kde or gnome, then yes, it will be slow. But if you just switch wm's, disable any services you don't use, move the ones you do use to inetd (so they only get launched when you actually use them), and avoid the monstrosities that are the full mozilla and openoffice.

      If you strip it really, really down, disabling any xfree modules you don't use, using something like pwm for window manager (less than 300k runtime size for a full wm), and opera for browser, you CAN fit a usable linux desktop on a 486 with 20 megs of ram (I've done it, it's possible).

    26. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "A number of the kids' games I've loaded on my XP machine won't run properly unless logged in as admin."

      This isn't Windows' fault. There's a LOT of crappy programmers out there that don't really understand computers (CS Grads in it for the money, obsolete old timers that don't like change, etc.). They're used to developing on DOS based OSes and don't understand the concept of security and NT. They make their program with the assumption that the logged in user has full control on all resources.

      To get around their crappy programs, usually giving write permissions to the local users group will do the trick. It may be necessary to do the same thing in the registry. Remember that regmon, filemon, and NTs auditing can be your friend. Regmon and filemon are free utilities made by Sysinternals.

      -Lucas

    27. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Material wealth is very important to the social status of children and is second only to how good looking their family is.

      Very well put Mr. Stepford, now step to the front of the line for your robotic wife.

    28. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no. Linux runs fine on P1s. However, I've found KDE to be dog slow on slower machines, and unfortunately Kids like GUIs. I personally regard a GUI as training wheels for a computer - once you get your balance, you no longer need the GUI.

    29. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know what kind of P1 you have, but it's been my experience that modern linux distros (Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat) run like crap on anything less than a p2-333.

      I've had no trouble running a modern distro on a P-200MMX. The secret was having 384MB of RAM.

    30. Re:I've set up a GNU/Linux machine for my kids too by shadowsurfr1 · · Score: 1

      Pentium II 233, 95 MB RAM. Fedora Core Release 1.

  6. Should have mentioned "parental controls" by bgat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... like Linux's built-in features to prevent K.D. from accidentally finding sites that aren't age-appropriate, or at least haven't been pre-approved by Mom and Dad.

    --
    b.g.
    1. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny

      If she's as smart as they make her out to be, then she'll have no problem deliberately finding those sites that Mom and Dad don't approve of ;-)

      --
      People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    2. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should have mentioned that you should pay attention to what your kids are viewing and not worrying about them interrupting your regular viewing habbits of Survivor and the Bachelor.

      Parental control is not a software program. It's a personal mission.

    3. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What is the point of parental control ? Can't we just educate kids. It's not like seeing a nude body will traumatize them for life.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    4. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got goat?

    5. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by wampus · · Score: 1

      I've seen lots of things on the internet that will traumatize children for life. Rotten.com springs to mind, as does stileproject.com.

    6. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Nude bodies are one thing...
      -Women inserting baseball bats into their distended vaginas,
      -old men fellating horses and
      -asian women vomiting into each other's rectums while a midget bangs nails through his penis
      ...are quite...quite..another.

    7. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by Daemonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Open Mozilla's Options menu

      Go to General->Connection Settings

      Select Manual Proxy Configuration

      HTTP Proxy: Localhost Port:80

      No Proxy For:sesamestreet.com, nick.com, etc.

    8. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      ...-asian women vomiting into each other's rectums while a midget bangs nails through his penis...

      Yes, ghastly...

      ...
      ...

      What's the URL? :)

    9. Re:Should have mentioned "parental controls" by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      what "built in features"??? where??? in the Kernel??? or just in one particular browser...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  7. Four year old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yea, that's great. And when she starts having trouble you can just tell her to RTFM!

    1. Re:Four year old... by archen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kid: how do I do xxx?
      Mom: RTFM
      Kid: dUd3, 1 4m go1n9 +o HaX0R J00r bOX0r !!
      Mom: how do you talk with numbers like that?

      Kid: sp34k n0+ +4Lk, J00r Gr4m0r $ux !

    2. Re:Four year old... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mom: My grandma is dead you insensitive clod!
      Kid: 50 +h4+'5 y 5h3 d1dN+ ]\/[0v3 4r0u]\[d 4L0+!!

  8. The phrases... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny
    My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D.
    ... and ...
    K.D. had watched her mom, my wife...

    ... have got me slightly worried. Slightly.

    1. Re:The phrases... by thdexter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he was listing, in the second phrase.

      --
      I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    2. Re:The phrases... by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Out of context quoting on your second snip... the full phrase was

      K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, and me using the various Linux-based computers in our home...

      Her mom is the writer's daughter. The writer's wife is a different person being listed along with the writer, since all three use the Linux-based computers in the home.

    3. Re:The phrases... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's an ambiguous sentence. You could interpret it either way and be correct. Though I am fairly sure he did not mean to imply that he is married to his daughter. :P

    4. Re:The phrases... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are ya supposed to do when your sister comes on to ya?

  9. Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole idea behind this setup is taking the time to put the system-important screens outside of the 4-year-old's view, so therefore she could click around the screen and even get to the web without getting into much trouble.

    A Windows-expert parent could set up Windows to be the same way. The key thing to having a kid be able to use a computer without breaking it is having a smart admin as a parent.

    1. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      that wasn't the fact at all... the fact was that a four-year-old is using Linux, not that it's safe for a four-year-old...

    2. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Might want to remember that the article is not about dumbing down the interface to make it "safe" for a child to use.

      It is about refuting the claim that Linux is "hard" to use.

      Can Linux be hard to use? Sure. At the same time if I turn off desktop icons and disable the TaskBar in Windows, you might find it hard to use Windows as well. That isn't the way Microsoft ships it, and the way Joe Barr configured his daughter's account is not the default view for Linux. In the default view for both Windows and Linux, you are working with a Point and Click interface. If you can learn one, you can probably learn the other, either as well, or instead.

      Then again I use four differen't OS's on a regular basis. You might have more trouble switching between two.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by sinistermidget · · Score: 1

      Ya, sure you could do the same thing with Windows, but I guaruntee you that within a couple of hours the machine will be reduced to a steaming pile of virus-laden adware.

      Get those recovery disks ready, because you will be routinely reinstalling Windows after your compu-toddler innocently clicks on the wrong popup that Bonzai-Buddy encouraged him to explore.

      If you don't believe me, I have four kids and nine desktop machines in the house to prove it. A couple of years ago most of the wretched Winboxes were transformed into LTSP workstations, and the remaining games machines were blocked at the firewall for all HTTP, Mail and IM traffic.

      Life has been good since then.

    4. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      Come on. If you are setting up a sandbox, why would you still use IE? I'd lock it into a kiosk mode (there are a few packages out there to do this with Windows), install Mozilla and make it both the default browser and the only "Internet" icon on the locked down.

      Additionally, I'd install a firewall with all outbound ports except 80 restricted as well as Mozilla being the only program allowed to access the Internet (ZoneAlarm can do this). I'd set up virus software that automatically downloads and patches without prompting.

      Obviously some of this stuff is harder/not doable with Win98, but if you actually want control over the machines and still want Windows compatibility, XP Pro lets you pretty much lock the machines down.

    5. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

      A Windows-expert parent could set up Windows to be the same way. The key thing to having a kid be able to use a computer without breaking it is having a smart admin as a parent.

      Works the same in an office situation (:

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    6. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by sinistermidget · · Score: 1

      Come on. If you are setting up a sandbox, why would you still use IE? I'd lock it into a kiosk mode (there are a few packages out there to do this with Windows), install Mozilla and make it both the default browser and the only "Internet" icon on the locked down.

      And any ten year old will soon find a site that doesn't work with Moz, go into "My Computer" and type in the URL in the address bar. Since IE can't be removed , we're back to square one.

      Windows is like a technology with a terminal illness. Only the Micro-minded will continue to pour all of their money and resources into keeping the dying patient on life support. Do yourself a favor and pull the plug already.

    7. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joe Barr?

      RTFA! :)

    8. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      A Windows-expert parent could set up Windows to be the same way.

      Indeed. My four year old daughter has been using her Mum's PC (running XP Home) for over a year now with no problems. All I did was set up a limited user account for her. Sometimes, older software (that still wants to write to Program Files, etc) has to be started by one of us grown-ups, using the "Run As..." service to give it the permission it needs, but other than that it's fine.

      I'll never forget the first time she typed her own name; her understanding of how to use the PC for what she uses it for is comparable to that of some adults I know.

    9. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on what's included in your definition of "use".

      I consider setting up my hardware, changing my configuration, updating my drivers and software, etc. part of my pattern of use. But not everyone would do that - especially in corporate settings, where that stuff is taken care of for you.

    10. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by js3 · · Score: 1

      how does it refute the claim that it is hard to use? if it was easy to use there wouldn't be that perception it is hard to use. It's a nice little story but that's where it ends.

      IMHO the best thing you can do for you kid is to let him/her do what other kids are doing. At this rate, at 8 years old she'll be totally hooked to the computer (a good computer programmer or something maybe) but totally lacking in social and life skills

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    11. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      1. I did say to use a piece of kiosk software.
      2. Even setting that aside, there are actually ways of both disabling IE and pretty much locking it down. With the Group Policy editor in XP Pro, you can lock out all of the settings like changing security options, lock proxy settings, etc. If you set *everything* in IE to the strictest settings, the VAST majority of problems with it go away.

      I've locked down XP boxes in computer labs for elementary schools and it CAN be done and it CAN work.

    12. Re:Sure, if you can dumb it down into a kisok... by crizh · · Score: 1

      'install a firewall with all outbound ports except 80 restricted as well as Mozilla being the only program allowed to access the Internet'

      RTFGrandparent

      --
      Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
  10. Kids can do it... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D., hasn't had any trouble figuring it out, and if she can do it, you can too."

    User Intelligence:
    Boss with MBA 4-year-old girl

    Seriously, though - kids learn at some incredible rates. They pick up language, new skills, etc. so much faster than adults. We often have to fight through a lifetime of doing something one way in order to do it a "better" or just plain newer way.

    BTW, the article is chock full of acronym hell if you're not pretty familiar with Linux (not so worried about the /. community).

    1. Re:Kids can do it... by pe1rxq · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One of the key things is wanting to do a job instead of wanting to use a certain tool...

      I have seen kids using sparc xterminals with netscape 4.75 (It was a few years back) on a linux system with twm as window manager for days without a problem, it wasn't until the first parents got to use them that there were complaints about it not being windows....

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Kids can do it... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      y daughter uses both linux and windows 2000. I catch her boting into linux on a regular basis to do her homework on OO.o or just plain websurfing or games like frozen bubble..

      I asked her what the difference is to her...

      she said, "nothing. they are both almost identical I like the KDE stuff better as it's prettier" when I told her that lots of people have trouble using linux her answer was, " that is stupid, there is almost nothing different..." my answer to her is "lots of times, adults are very stupid."

      remember that next time you deal with someone in Marketing whining that the color of her desktop is not what she wants or the new version of a app has a different icon or slightly different menu.

      lots of times, adults are very stupid.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Kids can do it... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      That's supposed to be:

      Boss with MBA < 4-year-old girl

    4. Re:Kids can do it... by lavalyn · · Score: 1

      lots of times, adults are very stupid

      Kids learn that at the age of 5. If not earlier. Except they won't qualify the statement.

      Don't roll your eyes at me, young man!

      --
      Doing the Right Thing should not be preempted by making a buck.
    5. Re:Kids can do it... by |_uke · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      If Im working on my system, I have to be carful. If I get up for too long, my 3 year old will literally close all my programs... log me out.. and log him self in. (which involves typing his password and etc. We recently changes his password. Was 123.. .now its a bit more complex. Wife didn't think he could do it.. ohhh how she was wrong hehe.)

      Then he either visits one of his websites (has links on his desktop for all his sites)... or loads up a game (various fisher price and etc... but he also likes to play railroad tycoon 3... he is a total train freak hehe)

      The one thing I REALLY HATE about the fisher price games though... is that they dont automatically shut down if you eject the cd. He forgets to quit the game now and then.. and just ejects the cd.. then remembers he has to quit first.. but by that time to game is acting funky =/)

      --
      Luke
    6. Re:Kids can do it... by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Thanks for teaching your kid to be condescending and insulting.

    7. Re:Kids can do it... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No I'm teaching my kid to understand life right away. that people are speeding on the highway not because they are making a bold statement agains unjust laws and too low limits... they are speeding because they are lemmings and simply doing "whatever everyone else does" and they tailgate and do other dumb things on the highway because they are just stupid....

      It's a fact of life, and I teach her to take advantage of the truths and facts of life. If most people are acting or are stupid, you cant be stupid, take advantage of their stupidity to step in front of the line, use their stupidity to make yourself look like the hero, and use their stupidity to help you influence them.

      MY nephews are a prime example.. one hung with the "cool" kids in highschool.. they were troublemakers smoked on school grounds, drank, did pot, dressed like dirty turds... he is unemployed and living in the slum.. the kid has a gigantic IQ and damn bright.. he has ZERO leadership skills and likes to "hang".

      my other nephew, he made it a point to hang out with the rich kids, talk to the rich kids's parents and act like a perfect citizen. He is now getting his masters in Engineering and is still on a free ride because he convinced many rich men that he was worthy of thier support. He is in the rich kids engineering Frat, he owns a 1986 VW golf but it never leaves the house as he rides with his friends and roomates in their BMW's and go skiing for free in Vail. He dresses the part, he act's the part he is not rich by any means.

      he is using the stupidity of the public, specifically the rich public to further himself and be a part of the "club" that takes care of you. When around them he act's and seems to think their way. i know for a fact he supports a flat tax for all americans and wished that companies were taxed really hard for polluting.. he will never EVER say that around the rich crowd...

      he will be fricking rich with a job he landed not because of what he knows but WHO he knows. and climb the ladder really high because he understands the need to use other people's stupidity against them. He should be a lawyer as he can convince anyone that he is on their side and like them.

      Oh and those of you thinking... "he's sponging" nope.. he always offers to pay for his stuff, and he does on a regular basis.. but if your roomate offers' to take you this weekend to Vail tot he family's chalet on the mountian for skiing, we just need to go to the airport to meet dad's learjet? only a farking retard would say no.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. $699 by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    These Linux tots better start their paper-routes and set up their lemonade stands early: Darl's going to be on his way to take their candy money.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:$699 by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Only if she is planning on using it in a comercial environment. Additionally, workstation fees are under $300 if I recall correctly. Joe may have a $1399 per processor server fee to pay, but only if he has a box set up as a server.

      Granted even the $300 single processor workstation charge is abusive to the consumer.

      -Rusty

      --
      You never know...
  12. linux is not hard by kwoff · · Score: 3, Funny
    Linux is not hard unless you convince yourself that it is.
    Somebody let Eric Raymond know that.
  13. If only I were that good... by alfred+hichcock · · Score: 0

    I am a computer programming student, and a I barely know how to use Linux. I wonder how long it will take for her to write her own scripts....

  14. Related link by skraps · · Score: 1
    --
    Karma: -2147483648 (Mostly affected by integer overflow)
  15. Wow, I'm not impressed. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A pre-schooler using a computer, I can't fathom that! Come on, seriously, why is this such a big deal? When I was two I could use a Commodore Vic20. That included plugging in cartridges, using the tape drive, and loading programs... Just like Dad and without a login.

    Almost a year ago my (at the time) 4 year old cousin was visiting my parent's house while I was in town. She asked for the laptop and fired up IE. She was on her favorite website (I don't remember what it was, Blues Clues?) in seconds. She knew the URL, she knew exactly where she wanted to navigate to, and she didn't need my help... I was utterly confused by the flashing, moving, and colorful icons. I couldn't discern what was clickable and what wasn't. She knew and that's all that mattered.

    Now... If I sat her down in front of a Linux machine w/KDE installed and told her "this is the IE icon" (or however she understood it) you don't think she would be able to do the same thing?

    This article reeked of parental excitement. Their child was interested in using the computer!!!

    Kids know computers... I realize that they are saying that KDE is easy enough for a child to use... Anything in X was that easy. It's the rest of Linux that isn't so easy.

    She was shoving the system tools off, "out of sight out of mind"... It's not so easy for a regular user of a system to do that. You might actually have to deal w/something on the computer if you aren't 2 years old.

    Linux is getting there but it certainly isn't as easy as they seem to be making it out to be. I wish it were but it's not and while I believe in advocating its use to everyone that might benefit from it, I don't think insulting people by saying "My two year old can use it, so can you" is the best way to go.

    1. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, when I was two and a half I could read the newspaper, that doesn't mean that kids who can't read the newspaper at that age are stupid. I was using Apple 2s in the same capacity as you were using your vic 20 when I was four or so (I didn't have access to a computer prior) but that doesn't mean everyone can.

      On the other hand, a four year old can use Windows just as easily as linux. You can do the same stuff to windows that you can do to linux. (Hide the taskbar, etc.) Of course, you will have to get a 101 key keyboard, because that pesky windows key will pop it right up, but the odds of hitting control-esc are somewhat slimmer. Regardless either way you can give the user extremely limited rights and hide most of the system from them.

      Other than that, you're spot on. Saying that linux is easy because a child can play games and mash the keyboard on it is ignorant and overlooks the broader issue of actually using the system to get work done.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      Saying that linux is easy because a child can play games and mash the keyboard on it is ignorant and overlooks the broader issue of actually using the system to get work done.

      What kind of work do you need to get done? Writing and printing documents, spreadsheets? Sending and receiving emails? Browsing web pages? Designing web applications? All can be done on Linux just as easily as on Windows, provided you're trained in the appropriate Windows or Linux programs.

      Once configured properly (and both Windows and Linux machines need to be configured before the average user can use them), Linux is just as usable for most tasks as Windows. THAT'S what the point of the article was.

      For an article on successfully using Linux to get professional work done, check out this PC World article.

    3. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by garcia · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I was two and a half I could read the newspaper, that doesn't mean that kids who can't read the newspaper at that age are stupid. I was using Apple 2s in the same capacity as you were using your vic 20 when I was four or so (I didn't have access to a computer prior) but that doesn't mean everyone can.

      So? I wasn't aware that I was touting my own computer skills at young ages. I was stating that it isn't uncommon and it certainly isn't a BFD. Especially not a big enough deal to a) get any sort of article written about it and b) to get posted on the front page of /. (where 99% of the people here were probably just as (if not more) proficient than this particular child).

    4. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Slashdot editors/fans really need to understand the difference between "using" a home linux desktop and "administering" a home linux desktop.

      It's like this: If your grandparents lived 1,000 miles away from you; you were their #1 tech support person; and they wanted a computer that would let them do office apps, email, IM, surf the internet, and a few games; would you set them up with a WinXP box or with a KDE|Gnome desktop?

      USING either is basically the same, but with a linux machine, you don't have to worry about the old folks getting popups, Outlook virii, BonzaiBuddy, WeatherBug, or malware that overwrites important .dlls. You don't have to worry about them downloading nifty free games that turns their computer into a DDoS zombie. By virtue of running a non-Windows box, they are forced to embrace a certain paranoia about the internet --- and think about it, if everyone had a certain level of paranoia about emails with attachments, free games, and banner ads that have detected security weaknesses on your machine, wouldn't we all be better off?

      So for me, there is no question about it. Grandma and Grandpa can't set up that linux box, but they sure as heck can use it. I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that the casual computer user would have a far better experience with linux than winXP, but I don't hear many people trumpeting this point of view like I think they should.

    5. Re:Wow, I'm not impressed. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Slashdot editors/fans really need to understand the difference between "using" a home linux desktop and "administering" a home linux desktop.

      There is no difference. In either case you're trying to make the computer do something. You have to do the administration, and you have to do the work (presumably) so there is no difference whatsoever. They are both common tasks (hopefully administration is less common.)

      Now I agree that a Linux system is not as susceptible to attack as a windows system, but at the same time it doesn't do something very important that Windows systems do: Run Win32 software reliably. SOME software works well with Wine or WineX, but the majority does not. My girlfriend's grandmother is due for a computer, and she's ending up with Windows 98 because it's what her daughter knows how to support, and because they want to be able to buy software for it at Wal-Mart. Of course the lack of Linux software at Wal-Mart is one of those Catch 22 things, yes? Just like the hardware support, and something I have no easy answer for. It's a matter of momentum, and time.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  16. TK85 all the same by rmaraujo · · Score: 1

    So did I with my father's TK85 in the early 80's. I could load and save things from my tape recorder and program it to show nice things on the screen. I think we can deduce that TK85 already had all there was to have about interfaces...

  17. As an addendum, by budhaboy · · Score: 1
    I've changed the icons on movies my Son likes to watch to images he associates with the movie.

    I've already set the defaults in Mplayer to be compatible with the TV, so when he needs only click on icons to navigate to the movies he wants to watch...

    1. Re:As an addendum, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both KDE and Gnome will display the first frame of the movie as the icon.

    2. Re:As an addendum, by budhaboy · · Score: 1
      Not with the stock SuSE 8.2 KDE and Konquor. All you get is an icon that looks like a piece of film (perhaps because they are XviD?).

      Even if it did, the boy would has an easier time picking 'james and the giant peach' if the icon is a picture of James, than if it is some illegible (he's only three and cant read) movie title.

  18. Old story, it's easy with a personal sysadmin by fantomas · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Software is easy for you, me or any four year old if you have a personal sysadmin to setup, configure, and support your usage. (grin) ...

    Seriously though the issue is - how easy is Linux/Windows/MacOS/any other software if you don't have a handy guru to help you configure and then support you when it goes wrong?

    The issue is not how easy a kid finds it when their dad is a software guru (though it's kinda cute, my Apple-crazy friend's 4 year old son is similar), but how Joe Public, who has no software engineer friends, finds setup and maintenance and patching.

    1. Re:Old story, it's easy with a personal sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the whole point is to encourage people to befriend a n engineer

    2. Re:Old story, it's easy with a personal sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, once the teaming masses ceed control of their computers to the Enlightened Linux Gurus, then Slashdot Nerds will be shown the respect they think they deserve, rather than contempt as it is now.

    3. Re:Old story, it's easy with a personal sysadmin by petrus4 · · Score: 1
      >(though it's kinda cute, my Apple-crazy friend's
      >4 year old son is similar), but how Joe Public,
      >who has no software engineer friends, finds
      >setup and maintenance and patching.

      Yes, but what you're forgetting is that the entire reason why Joe Public finds computer use difficult is because he either hasn't been brought up with it, or worse, his primary computer-related education has been Windows based.

      The father of the 4 year old in this article comes across as a highly intelligent individual himself, who is trying to stimulate, among other things, intellectual development in his daughter. UNIX encourages user intelligence. Windows on the other hand relies on and encourages the premise that the person using it is someone who has trouble drooling properly.

      The other thing is, a child's intellectual development is dependent to a large degree on the parents' priorities with regard to raising him or her. Intelligence is more about acquired attitudes and habits than it is about inherent neurological ability. A child has little chance growing up to be intellectually active if his/her parents are morons themselves...which sadly, seems to be the case the majority of the time.

  19. some incest crept in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In the first paragraph we learn that KD is the author's granddaughter.

    The second paragraph begins

    "K.D. had watched her mom, my wife,..."

    Hate to nitpick, but that makes KD's mom is also her grandmother...

    1. Re:some incest crept in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the whole sentence, cock-sucker.

      K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, and me using the various Linux-based computers in our home...

      That's a list of three different people, moron.

  20. K.D. by ZenBased · · Score: 2, Funny

    and her last names starts with an E ? That would be rather freaky ;)

    --
    http://www.virtualconcepts.nl/
    1. Re:K.D. by Ripplet · · Score: 2, Funny
      and her last names starts with an E ? That would be rather freaky ;)

      No, it would just mean at least one of her parents was rather geeky ;)

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    2. Re:K.D. by Bombcar · · Score: 1


      and her last names starts with an E ? That would be rather freaky ;)


      No, it would just mean at least one of her parents was rather geeky ;)

      Rhyming? I bet you think you're pretty sneaky.

  21. yuck by negacao · · Score: 1

    she's four, dude.

    [it's sarcasm....]

  22. Too young? by SirNAOF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As wonderful as it is to see a young child able to use Linux, is it really necessary for children use computers? They are wonderful tools, and there are many games for young children that help them learn, but really, couldn't the parents teach the children just as well?

    The real problem is when parents let their children sit in front of a TV or computer all day. There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

    --
    Jeremy Baumgartner
    1. Re:Too young? by curlyk · · Score: 1

      The real problem is when parents let their children sit in front of a TV or computer all day. There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

      Yes. The sadest part about the article is the start in life here which encourages inactivity and couch/PC potato behaviour. With the much reported obesity worries, I would rather see an article about kids that prefer to be active, even if they can use Linux. (Although granted, such a story would probably not make /.)

    2. Re:Too young? by John_Sauter · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think it is important for children to use computers, and not just the games.

      Computers barely existed when I was young, but, remembering that the most important skill I learned in High School was typing, I introduced my children to my Apple II when they were in elementary school. At first we would type their assignments together on the computer; later they did the typing themselves. Their comfort level with computers allowed them to find jobs in the computer industry, and with luck they will be able to support me in my old age.
      John Sauter (J_Sauter@Empire.Net)

    3. Re:Too young? by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1

      As a professional programer I can tell you that beyond a shadow of a doubt you are a moron.

      There is nothing out side of the internet, and TV moved inside the net a long time ago!

      What do you think we live in sir? The 3rd world? We have Google!!

      Transportation is exactly that, a way of transporting you between various connections that would otherwise be unaccesable do to inconvienent firewalls.

      Grow up. Close the door. And be soothed by the soft mellow glow of your world.

    4. Re:Too young? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1
      There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

      Now why the hell didn't anyone tell me that earlier?! Oh, probably because I spent my youth building forts in a field and shooting BB guns at my friends.

      Remember, folks, people don't put friends eyes out, small brass balls do!
    5. Re:Too young? by javatips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's not necessary for children to use computer, but children like to learn things. A computer is like any other thing they play with... And they like it because when they use it they learn stuff. My 3 years old daughter just love playing with the computer. She likes Bob the Builder web site, she like the 101 Dalmatians Print Studio... She can print dalmatians drawing, then she gets some pencils and start coloring them, then she take some scotch tape and tape the colored drawing on the walls.

      Most of the time, she does not want to stop playing with the computer... I don't beleive studies that say that a children attention cannot span more than 15 minutes. A child on a computer can play with the same game for hours if you let him do it. I try not to let her play for more than 30 minutes at a time, but its always difficult to make her leave the computer.

      Recently she even started playing with Zelda on my N64. She just walk around, but each time she plays it, she learned a little bit more how to actually go where she wants.

      As you said, the problem lies when parents use these tools as a replacement for the attention they should give to the children. But like any tools, when they are well used, they will expand the knowledge of the children. At least, a computer is more interactive than a TV.

      We live in a world full of technology... So the children must learn it... As long as you give attention to your children and that you expose them to a lot of different things, then it's a good thing. When you start using technology to discharge yourself of your parenting role, then it's a bad thing.

    6. Re:Too young? by Peldor · · Score: 0
      There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

      But is it better than just staring at screens?
      Not if you've got a good desktop wallpaper.

    7. Re:Too young? by cybersaga · · Score: 1

      really? [peers outside] huh...

    8. Re:Too young? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Our problem with youth obesity (and diabetes!) isn't because they are sedentary, though certainly more activity would help. It's because we tend to feed our children crappy food, let them snack unchecked, and so on. As usual it comes down to a lack of parental guidance. It's not necessary to keep them away from the computer, keep them away from the ding-dongs and ho-hos instead (that works on two levels - I caught the joke already to spare y'all the effort.) And avoid processed foods which are loaded with sugar which - in case you totally missed this factoid like I did for many years, though I have know it for many now as well - will make you fat if you don't burn it off. That goes for white flour too. Is a peanut butter and jelly sugar/carbs bomb really the best thing you can feed your child?

      Of course, partly this is because parents just don't have time to sit around and cook. In our current economic climate, both parents working is the norm...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Too young? by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...parents just don't have time to sit around and cook. In our current economic climate, both parents working is the norm...

      Forgive me for being pedantic and going off for a minute on your otherwise insightful post... BUT...

      It isn't that our current economic climate leads both parents to work. It is rather that the current social climate leads both parents to feel as though they need to make enough to have a certain amount of stuff (Keeping up with the Jonses) which from a standpoint of either survival or happiness contributes nothing. One parent working would lead to the family "struggling" -- but "struggling" doesn't mean having to walk for five miles to get jars of clean water. It doesn't mean sending the children to bed hungry twice a week to make ends meet. It means cutting their hair yourself. Or not being able to pay the dues for the soccer club. The time to cook is there. It has always been there. And we live in one of the richest nations in the history of the world. Even being "lower middle class" in the US means having enough stuff. It's all about choices.

      Again -- I'm not saying that parents who don't make these choices are bad. I'm trying to point out that it is certainly possible to have that time back but it isn't the economy that leads people away from having one parent raise the child. It is the society at large.

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    10. Re:Too young? by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      My six-year-old used her PC to produce a 4-page newsletter, sectioned up into pets, gardening, school, hobbies, etc, etc. It made a nice change from battling her 9-year-old sister on networked Age of Empires...

    11. Re:Too young? by Eagle5596 · · Score: 1

      I think it is great to have children interact with computers. My parents had me on a computer from day one, and taught me to program on an old Atari PC from 1979. The encouraged me to learn about computers, and focused me on solving problems with them. The result? I got my BS in Computer Science, now work for NASA, and in the Fall will be attending the University of Illinois to get my PhD in Computer Science.

      I think exposure to computers from an early age had a lot to do with this, and would encourage all parents to do the same to their kids.

    12. Re:Too young? by SirNAOF · · Score: 1

      I will admit that I enjoy surfing around and watching TV, but there's only so much of that I can handle. I need to go outside, breathe fresh air, feel the sun, to DO something.

      Although there are a lot of things that you can do online, there are many, many things that you just can't do without leaving the dimly-lit basement and going outside.

      --
      Jeremy Baumgartner
    13. Re:Too young? by Stone316 · · Score: 1

      My dad at first wouldn't let me play games so all I could do was type up my school notes. I had the best notes in class (which I could search) and at my peak I could type almost 100 words per minute. My mom was doing a typing course as part of a program she was doing. We would have races all the time and i'd practice just so I could beat here. I find it amazing that alot of people IT still hunt and peck. It may be just me but the sound of people typing erks the hell out of me, especially when they hunt and pick. You can hear those guys a mile away.

      --
      "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    14. Re:Too young? by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 1

      The real problem is when parents let their children sit in front of a TV or computer all day. There's a lot more to life than just staring at screens.

      Yes, of course, if that's all you do. Now if you sit with them and interact with the screen, you help them get through the maze the first time, you show them how to change Polly Pockets' dress color, you help them sound out the words they don't yet know, you ask what they think Lilo and Stitch are going to do next, you help them think through the problems in Crashbox . . .

      In short, when you make TV and the computer interactive instead of expecting them to be electronic babysitters, you're accomplishing two things. You're reinforcing what they learn, and more important, you're spending time with them.

      And the same can be said for going to the zoo, or the park, or to the theater or doing homework or playing the violin or whatever you and your children can do together.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    15. Re:Too young? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      I'm willing to accept that the line is someplace between society and economy, but not that it's entirely societal. People who have to walk five miles for clean water also have problems feeding their children, but for different reasons. Note also that in the 1950s it was possible and normal for the man to bring home the bacon, and the woman to stay home with the kids; Home ownership was high, people had a car or two. So there is more stuff available now, but then as now we lived in a culture of consumption, and some things just consume a disproportionately high percentage of income these days. Energy prices of all types are significantly up much more than inflation over the last decade, generally having doubled or more, whereas food items (the usual metric) have gone up much less than 100% over the last decade. So something is certainly out of whack.

      I will grant you that as a nation we seem to have our priorities all wrong, but I haven't noticed a greater need amongst people to consume, yet it has become more difficult to do so.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:Too young? by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      also that in the 1950s it was possible and normal for the man to bring home the bacon, and the woman to stay home with the kids

      Agreed. But any time you use "the 1950s" as a yardstick of ANYTHING you have to take into account the fact that the 1950s were a time of unprecedented prosperity for the United States -- we were rebuilding a world that had been destroyed by a decade of war while we went (almost completely) untouched at home. Immigration had been down for about two decades. Two decades before, unemployment was approaching 20+%. Child labor was big in the 1890s. Pick your time period and "the norm" in the US shifts rather radically. I don't mean to fan the flames but what you wrote was true in the 1950s for many urban/suburban whites. BUT...there were still large pockets of poverty in rural areas and among people of color...

      Energy prices of all types are significantly up much more than inflation over the last decade

      Of course this trend doesn't show any signs of letting up. Again -- the 1950s were a blip. Unless we can come up with less expensive sources of energy (if it is even possible) things are GOING to get tighter. But the fact remains that in spite of all of this, people can still choose where they live. They can choose how they live. There are still areas of the country when you can live relatively cheaply. There are also areas of the country where making minimum wage will lock you in a rent so high and having to own a car, that two parents will need to work to maintain these things. It all depends on choices and priorities. I won't pretend to be naive about this. But my grandparent post had more to do with thinking about what is possible and encouraging people to think more before locking themselves into a worldview that strips us of choice. You don't have to buy into that culture of consumption...

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    17. Re:Too young? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      hell yes. I often say that Typing 101 was the most useful class I ever attended, and it's true. I might argue, however, that History and Poli-Sci were more important to my intellectual growth.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    18. Re:Too young? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I know it's late in the conversation, but...

      My wife and I have large student loans, to the point that neither of us could pay them by ourselves. However, if we both work, then we can pay our loans and have enough left over for some nice stuff. Some people might look at us and think that we're both greedy materialists who work to support our lifestyle, but that's simply not true in our case.

      Put mathematically, suppose that our minimum required monthly income is x. My wife and I each make .8x. If one of us doesn't work, then we go bankrupt. If we both work, we have .6x left over to invest as we see fit.

      Just something to think about.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  23. Get her in touch with ESR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe she could help him hook up his printer.

  24. Children Learn - so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't see how this demonstrates ease of use on Linux.

    Anyone knows that Kids have inate abilities to learn at a fast rate, including the ability to learn things with very little tuition.

    A child 'exposed' to a language just 'picks up' that language without any real tuition, they mimick their parents and come to gain an understanding for the words and sentences and grammatical structure.

    I'm sure the same thing is happening here. The child is 'exposed' to an interface and 'picks up' what to do by mimicking the parents, gaining an understanding of each action as they go.

  25. What about seniors? by BillFarber · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be more impressed by a 90-year old figuring out how to use Linux.

    1. Re:What about seniors? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      A much harder task. I was hired as a tutor by a 90 or so year old guy once, he got a new mac, his first computer ever. It took two training sessions to get the whole "how to move the mouse" thing down, something my son easily learned when he was 3 years old.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:What about seniors? by bishop's+farewell · · Score: 1
      My 80-ish father is getting along fine with KDE, kwrite, kword, etc. I built him a system for Christmas. His previous experience with personal computers was an early Apple (floppy disk only).

      It probably helps that he has no preconceptions to get in the way, unlike people who compare Linux to Windows, or Open Office to Microsoft Office.

  26. Hardly new or interesting by menscher · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was that age, if you asked me how to spell my name I would respond "D A M I A N Return" (Commodore PET user since before I can remember). And I learned how to count because you had to fast-forward the tape so-many-seconds to reach a certain game (TRS 80 model 100). Now maybe if she was programming....

    1. Re:Hardly new or interesting by rhiorg · · Score: 1

      ...which was strange to everyone since your name is Robert.

      Seen "The Omen" too many times? :)

  27. Debian JR by robstah · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Debian Jr. project has been around for quite a long time. Its aims are to package and maintain a collection of relevant applications for the younger generation within the Debian framework.

    This is very much an active project which is working with some of the other organisations. I myself have experimented with some of the stuff it includes with my niece. As mentioned in the article tuxpaint seems to be very popular for the pre-school age group.

    The growth of these "Custom Debian Distributions" (the contents of which can usually be used on a traditional Debian install) should help bring free software into lots more situations.

    --
    Rob 'robster' Bradford
    Debian Planet Guy
    We are the apt. You will be packaged. Resistance is futile.
    1. Re:Debian JR by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      You know, you really scared me for a second. From the title I though you were going to talk about your kid who was named Debian Jr. (yes emphasis on both words).

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:Debian JR by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1
      I myself have experimented with some of the stuff it includes with my niece.
      bash$ apt-get install niece
      package niece-0.0.4 depends on the following packages:
      brother-stuff >= 0.2.0 *
      sissy-face >= 0.2.2 *
      recommended packages:
      ttpw (Toys to Play With) >= 4.2
      food >= 0.5

      (This is probably not correct apt-get output, but bear with)
      *based on what I call my own brotherstuff and sissyface
      --
      Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  28. a heart warming /. story.... get out... no really by psyberjedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is how to get linux onto the desktop and into the home. This girl will probably use linux for the rest of her life. This is great for the entire community. I dont know if one exists, but perhaps a website to turn kids to linux would be a great help the future of the OS. It is not as sexy or carry the bragging rights that kernel development does, but developing more software that a kid can use (not necessarily that young) opens the door to the next generation.

    KDE while not my WM of choice (dont be shocked by the tone of my voice...), has a number of fun toys for kids, and Debian Jr. will help yours truly bring along my lil' jedi with linux from an early age.

    --
    He who confuses his religion with his science knows neither.
  29. Yes, but... by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Has she compiled the kernel yet?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by essreenim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Girl_A: Hi, wanna play barbie, K.D.
      K.D.: l0g0ff

  30. It's sort of funny.... by budhaboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    reading other's comments that dis the author for merely dumbing KDE down to a kiosk... I presume those folks don't have kids. My son LONGS for the day he can 'use' a computer. He struggles with lack of freedom he sees in having to ask for help in using the computer (when his parents do not).

    It's important to allow toddlers the illusion of freedom, it helps reenforce the idea that curiosity can lead to great things.

  31. Anyone else find it weird? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little off topic I guess, but I can't seem to wrap my brain around the intro of the article:


    "... My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D., hasn't had any trouble figuring it out, and if she can do it, you can too. K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, ..."


    Ummmm, does that mean the author re-married his own daughter so that THEIR child is his granddaughter? Or am I just completely out to lunch here?

  32. So... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

    My users are dumber than 4 year olds?

    Wait.. that's insulting to 4 year olds... sorry, let me correct it:

    My users are dumb.

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You insensitive clod!

      I'm DUM!

      wait...

    2. Re:So... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      I think it is a lot easier to teach a kid not to do something and often you have only to tell them once while no matter how often you tell it to your users, they'll still click on those damn viruses they get by e-mail !

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    3. Re:So... by freeweed · · Score: 1

      My users are dumber than 4 year olds?

      How big of a 4 year old?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    4. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you just aren't a good teacher.

    5. Re:So... by the_mad_poster · · Score: 1

      No kidding.

      Good thing that's not what I'm paid to do, huh?

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    6. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I imagine the POS registers at McDonalds are pretty self-managing.

  33. IANAP by blixel · · Score: 0, Troll

    I am not a parent ... and I never plan to be ... but God help me - if I ever have a kid, I pray I don't go around boring the heck out of other people with stories about my kid.

    1. Re:IANAP by rhiorg · · Score: 1

      But now you've bored us with your story of not having a kid!!! :p

    2. Re:IANAP by Ripplet · · Score: 4, Funny
      if I ever have a kid, I pray I don't go around boring the heck out of other people with stories about my kid.

      Sorry to disillusion you pal, but you will. It's in the parents' charter or something.
      (And yes, IAAP!).

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    3. Re:IANAP by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

      IAAP

      It's part of the subliminal training they give parents in the waiting room at the OB's office, and in the hospital waiting room while you wait for you baby to be born.

      A parents innate love of their children is probably the only thing that keeps us from flushing them down the toilet right after they "pop out" of mom. (Anybody who has seen a "Fresh" baby knows EXACTLY what I'm talking about. ICK!)

    4. Re:IANAP by gammoth · · Score: 1

      Too true! It's a law of nature that you will relate routine events in your child's life as either humorous and insightful anecdotes or monumental epics.

      Rock on, Moms and Dads!

    5. Re:IANAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the horror stories! Or is that what you call humorous and insightful anecdotes?

  34. This highlights something.. by adamgreenfield · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought to be true for quite some time. Linux really shines in its ability to customize the user's experience to fit the user's needs. This is a strongpoint that really lends itself to application in Elementary and Pre-Elementary learning enviroments.

    This article also highlights a good example of postive computer interacion where the childs family took and interest in their computer activites and really made the whole thing a good experience. Interesting reading.

    --
    -Adam C. Greenfield
  35. An early start by thpdg · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I would expect that every serious reader of /. who is competent in their field, is that way because of an early start. TRS-80, Apple II, Vic-20, C64, those Radio Shack x-in-1 electronics kits. All of these early experiences have made us what we are, and turned us into Linux Geeks and PERL hackers, RF Engineers and whatever else we do, as a collective group. What are we stirring up in the next generation when we provide something better then Windows? I just hope not another Bill Gates!

    --

    -Patrick

    "They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

  36. wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell kind of a scam are you people running here?!? With a title like that I expect, nay demand, a nsfw link. A page of filth, degradation and naughty penguins.

    And what do I get? A story about some old fart's granddaughter!?! You people suck...

  37. Big Deal by CoasterFamily · · Score: 1

    I read this and all I can say is... Big Deal! So a toddler can use a browser and a drawing program. This could be done in Windows, OSX, etc. No big deal.

    Heck, my 2-year-old daughter can use my wife's Palm III. Is that a big deal? Not really.

    1. Re:Big Deal by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      This is precisely what the article is about. Not being harder for child to use Linux for this kind of stuff than Windows.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is pretty much because anything usable in Linux was copied from Windows in the first place.

  38. *BSD for Seniors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'd be more impressed by a 90-year old figuring out how to use Linux."

    For those much closer to tne end of their life, there is *BSD.

    1. Re:*BSD for Seniors by 74nova · · Score: 1
      For those much closer to tne end of their life, there is *BSD.
      i spose they can die together, eh?
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
  39. Bravo MTV... Turning the US in Thailand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    much more efficently than one little girl at a time.

    If they hadn't bravely lead the way in the sexualization of children, your comment wouldn't be funny, and I wouldn't be able to look foreward to K.D. working at Raisins in 4 to 6 years.

  40. not linux specific by 2.246.1010.78 · · Score: 1

    tell them that you know of one four-year-old who has been handling it daily for more than a year.

    call me again when she decided to wipe his HD to install debian or gentoo from scratch. Oh what joy she had compiling her first kernel...

  41. How many by dj245 · · Score: 0, Troll
    How many of you expected pictures of a decently hot chick on the article page? Come on! Fess up! No pictures at all (except the little penguin icon). Then I actually had to readthe article. Turns out she is 4. Well I don't know about you, but I don't want any of that.

    Now if Martha Stewart made a website about how she uses linux on the prison laptops and puts up pictures of herself in swimwear, I might be interested.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  42. Re:Sad. by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

    everyone's using Word

    No everyone is using a word processor....
    Having to use the exact same program as others to do a job is typical thinking of an adult.
    Kids see a word processor, it has a field to type text, it has some toolbar icons to change the font size and apearance and it has a 'file' menu with 'save', 'open' and 'print' options.
    Can you tell me exactly which wordprocessing progam I just described?

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  43. Reading comprehension is difficult, isn't it? by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, and me using the various Linux-based computers in our home...

    He's listed off the three people his granddaughter has watched using the computer, her mother, his wife, and himself.

  44. My three year old could do ktuberling by mainframemouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Emily, my three year old could do the Mr Potato head game. What I found curious is the machine is dual boot and she knew which OS had the game. I'm glad other posters have mentioned using X is childsplay not linux. I've still not got full functionality from my radeon 9200 under linux. That said, I'd rather let Emily run amok in linux than window.

  45. Wrong state, you insensitive clod! by Schwartzboy · · Score: 1

    Well, not only was the quote taken a bit out of context, but the article clearly states that the author lives & works in the Austin, TX area.

    For what you're implying, we'd have to have an article from a writer based in Arksansas, Alabama, or Missouri.*

    *Disclaimer: I'm a Missouri native, I've got family (ick) in 'Bama, and I make no excuses for Arkansas whatsoever thank you very much.

    --
    "Linux doesn't exist. Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix"- Kieren O'Shaughnessy
    1. Re:Wrong state, you insensitive clod! by Scurrilous+Knave · · Score: 1

      On behalf of the entire state of Arkansas, you are cordially invited to bite our shiny razorback asses, you insensitive Show-Me clod!

  46. Perl, SDL, OpenGL, Festival, kids... by Speare · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the evenings where I'm not busy, I've been writing my own Linux application for edutainment purposes. I call it Toy::World. My daughter is now four years old, and just the other day I created a new account on one home Linux machine for her to use.
    • Perl
      A kid's application should be like clay, changing it on a whim to try new things quickly.
    • SDL
      This Perl module provides scripted access to the SDL (Simple Direct-media Layer) libraries. Hopefully, this whole thing will be mostly portable to Windows.
    • OpenGL
      When the graphics are simple, and hardware assisted, a scripting language like Perl starts making more sense. The actual application logic doesn't need a lot of horsepower.
    • Festival
      I pipe many text messages off to Festival, since young kids aren't going to be able to read a prompt like "How many apples do you see?" I wish the TTS community had better packaging for alternative voices like MBROLA's extensions... I've yet to get anything but three pure Festival voices working.
    • OpenDE
      I want to develop Perl bindings to the Open Dynamics Engine, letting the on-screen toys "fall" and "bounce" and interact realistically. It looks very promising, but I'll save that work for later.
    • Toy::World
      My library consists of about 3000 lines so far, not counting the docs and auxilliary helper routines. I'm working to make extensions as simple and flexible as possible, so the curriculum can grow quickly and spontaneously.

    Toy::World will be able to handle basic lessons and drills at first, such as counting and adding, letter and shape identification. I want to start building on those ideas into the usual early-childhood skills of understanding money, subtraction, words, matching, memory skills, and animal identification.

    I've yet to work out the basic reward system, but I'm thinking of a sort of token-winning, token-spending theme, where you can play certain lessons to win on-screen coin tokens Mario-style, and some lessons may require spending those same tokens (or Mom can check out the totals for a few real-world benefits).

    With a lot more work, I want to get into more hands-on experimentation. Simulated water-pouring, block-stacking, multiplication drills, cause/effect lessons, and even networked "shared toys" simulations involving small groups of children.

    By that time I hope to have opened the project to community help. Contact me if you're interested.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:Perl, SDL, OpenGL, Festival, kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck with the project, sounds interesting!

      But ya know.... the reward system... gee, wouldn't it be as well to go with the ol' 'praise' system, rather than 'material' rewards? What fundamentals are we trying to teach here... learning for greed and material rewards or because it's a Good Thing?

      Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against greed and material rewards; but still - some things are independently good, and learning is definitely one of them.... GMR's shouldn't be taught as the most fundamental value, against which all others are to be measured. (Besides, praise/appreciation/acknowledgement of a job well done is amazingly effective. Seems to be a basic human thing.)

      My hands-down favorite language learning program made a cheerful tone on a correct answer, and a flat two-note on a wrong one. It actually turned out to be very motivating, funnily enough. Just playful and fun to play. And I was 26 at the time...(you could set this to "applause" vs "mildly derisive laughter" if you wanted...! That quickly became too much though.)

    2. Re:Perl, SDL, OpenGL, Festival, kids... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      With a lot more work, I want to get into more hands-on experimentation. Simulated water-pouring, block-stacking, multiplication drills, cause/effect lessons, and even networked "shared toys" simulations involving small groups of children.

      Does this project remind anyone else of the Book in Neal Stephenson's The Diamond Age? Just checking.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Perl, SDL, OpenGL, Festival, kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simulated water-pouring, block-stacking, multiplication drills, cause/effect lessons, and even networked "shared toys" simulations involving small groups of children.

      Creepy.

      Why not let the kid just go outside and play with real kids, water, and blocks? I know, I know, it's a crazy idea, but give it a chance. I've heard rumors that such activities will contribute to something called "GETTING A LIFE." Someday your kid will realize her dad is a fucking dork and decide she really wants one of those "life" things, and it sounds like she ain't gettin' it at home.

  47. My GOD! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 5, Funny

    SHE'S FOUR YEARS OLD! HAVE YOU NO DECENCY ?!

    It must be this script kiddie porn I've been hearing so much about...

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  48. Kids are Smart by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this story nicely illustrates how smart children can be. I have a brother who just turned six, and has seen Windows installs so often he can do it (at least he instructed me last time when I did it). That said, he insists on Linux these days "because it has better games". By these, he means rafkill, xonix, and sopwith. For sopwith, he even figured the controls (which are about the most horrible ever - especially on a Dvorak keyboard) in a few minutes.

    I'm gonna give the kid a book about programming and see how long it takes before he writes some revolutionary app that only he could think of...

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Kids are Smart by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Forgot to add...

      He uses web and email. The other day I was working on a program to stream media over the internet. He asked me what I was writing, so I told him. Later, he woke me up and asked if he could use my computer. I told him to use the other computer, since mine was powered down. But he said he needed to use mine, because he wanted to send a movie to some friend. It took me five minutes to realize that he wanted to use the program I had been writing, and that was why de wanted to use my computer.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Kids are Smart by daveewart · · Score: 1

      ... especially on a Dvorak keyboard ...

      You make your kid use a Dvorak keyboard? That's *evil*.

      --
      "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    3. Re:Kids are Smart by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this. What is so smart about clicking on an icon to bring up a program and mashing computer keys to put symbols into a writing program? Gorilla's can do that and even form sentences.

      The entire article is idiotic. No one has ever said that it is hard to double click on an icon in Linux to bring up a program.

    4. Re:Kids are Smart by sfraggle · · Score: 1
      If you're using my SDL Sopwith port, you can use the arrow keys instead of the original keys.

      </shameless plug>

      --
      were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    5. Re:Kids are Smart by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the one! For some reason, when he played it he used the traditional ones...

      Anyway, thanks for writing it! It's still a great game after all those years.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  49. In a few years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mom and dad will be out, and she'll be looking for early unwrapped Christmas presents and accidentally come across the laptop hidden in the closet, or under the bed. She'll open a joke e-mail for nero-online.org/lastmeasure and the damage will have been done anyway. She'll backpack across europe, and when she returns home, dad can't look her in the eye, because he saw that german shiste video she made with the midget, and how she managed to rent an apartment for a week in amsterdam with no money....

  50. Everyone's using Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having to use the exact same program as others to do a job is typical thinking of an adult.

    Because the adults have learned the hard way, that unless you havge the same program, you are going to get into a big hassle when you try to share your documents with someone else.

    The kids, on the other hand, are happy using something that is not useful. Kids buy toy cell phones that do nothing but beep and have little candy-compartments. Adults know better.

    "Hey Joe? That Word document you sent me? My WordScar program says it converts it, but all of the formatting is off and the fonts don't match."

  51. Wrong icon? by Aliencow · · Score: 1

    A babe using linux should've had the spam icon, no?

  52. KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by daveewart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My daughter is almost 3 and has been using her own KDE session on my Debian box for the past few months. I set up a username for her, so that I could log her in and know that she couldn't mess up anything I cared about.

    We were gobsmacked when we realised that she had figured out how to type her username and password, though. She was *so* pleased with herself when she got that sussed out.

    On her desktop, she has Mozilla Firefox set to go to BBC CBeebies - appropriate content for pre-school and you can't 'escape' the site, since all links are internal. She also enjoys using TuxPaint to draw pictures for us.

    I'm hoping she's going to do a spot of Toddler Linux Advocacy at the local playgroups soon ...

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
    1. Re:KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bearing in mind that kids are pretty smart...you'd better hide the location bar, the "Tools" menu ...oh, and the "Manage Bookmarks" entry in the Bookmarks menu...

      Actually, if she's determined enough to bookmark the site, then edit it to point somewhere else, you'd better stop her saving pages...in case she edits a link and opens up the new, local page which has her link to www.innocentSoundingURLThatPointsToGoatPorn.com.

      I guess this is the same as the real world though...hide all the chemicals and protect all the table corners but they'll still manage to run headlong into a wall with a vase on their heads.

    2. Re:KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      and has been using her own KDE session on my Debian box for the past few months.

      Don't you think it's about time you put your foot down and told her to log out? Maybe go outside once a month?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by Morosoph · · Score: 1
      On her desktop, she has Mozilla Firefox set to go to BBC CBeebies - appropriate content for pre-school and you can't 'escape' the site, since all links are internal. She also enjoys using TuxPaint to draw pictures for us.
      No good, I'm afraid. You can click the BBCi icon in the corner. Time to build a firewall?
    4. Re:KDE, Mozilla Firefox, TuxPaint, TuxRacer ... by daveewart · · Score: 1

      No good, I'm afraid. You can click the BBCi icon in the corner.

      True, but all links from the Interesting Pictures keep within the site.

      And we supervise her, of course. Slightly more to the point than filtering outgoing traffic!

      --
      "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  53. Doesn't anyone see anything wrong with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And geeks wonder why they get beat up on the playground. Greeeeat, my daughter can use KDE at age 2, but she talks like she has a pile of shit in her mouth.

    Just because your 2 year old can point and click doesn't prove that her dad is a bonefied genius. Quit trying to validate yourself through your kid.

    Go outside, play catch with your kid, and get her some HUMAN interaction. Maybe then she won't become the social regect that we're all too framilar with.

  54. Live CD is a good idea for kids by hey · · Score: 1

    Like the subject says a live Linux CD is good for
    kids so they can't touch the harddrive. I tried a live Linux CD with my kid but it was just KDE
    (I can recall which - probably linuxforkids.org)
    with some icons for some kid apps. In my opinion
    KDE is too much for kids. For young kids there should just be a icons for the apps and nothing
    else. However I notice in my preschoolers class they have a regular Windows box with kids apps and they see to figure it out.

  55. First babe using Linux post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First babe using Linux post

  56. must be done... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 0, Troll

    In Soviet Russia, 4 year old control YOU

  57. A simple solution to any computer problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux is not hard unless you convince yourself that it is.

    Ah, so the next time I'm having trouble with my PC, all I have to do is remember to "think uncomplicated thoughts, think uncomplicated thoughts, think..."

  58. Re:"Babe"??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess daddy was the mod! Jesus, thin skinned idiot geek, get a fucking life.

  59. Not a real world example. by doublem · · Score: 4, Funny

    Based on the complexity of the language in the article, we can safely conclude that the grandfather is of above average intelligence and education.

    Given the warm and caring nature hinted at in the narrative itself, we can conclude that this individual probably married a woman of comparable intelligence, as he lacks the characteristics necessary to desire a shallow woman lacking in intelligence.

    We can also assume that his children, following the usual human pattern of using their parents' relationship as a template, made similar choices in their choice of a spouse.

    Thus we can see that this four year old is the product of at least two generations of intelligent people marrying intelligent people, with a clear value for nurturing their offspring.

    In short, this is about a smart kid with a caring family who learns how to use computers. Not applicable in the workplace, as this kid is probably smarter than most the people I work with.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Not a real world example. by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Given the warm and caring nature hinted at in the narrative itself, we can conclude that this individual probably married a woman of comparable intelligence, as he lacks the characteristics necessary to desire a shallow woman lacking in intelligence.

      Let's be clear about this. NO MAN lacks the characteristics necessary to desire shallow women.

    2. Re:Not a real world example. by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 1


      Caviate: 1 in 10, have the characteristics necessary to desire shallow men.

      Not that there is anything wrong with that.

    3. Re:Not a real world example. by doublem · · Score: 1

      I don't desire shallow women.

      At least I don't seek them out. Hell, even the one night stands back when I was single were with women I could have an interesting conversation with afterwards.

      OK, there were a few women whose education left something to be desired, but I was young and immature, seeking nothing beyond the purely physical. I've grown up a lot since then.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    4. Re:Not a real world example. by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      Translation of parent post: my wife reads slashdot, and I need some brownie points ;)

    5. Re:Not a real world example. by doublem · · Score: 1

      Translation of parent post: my wife reads slashdot, and I need some brownie points ;)

      No, no no.

      I'm engaged, not married. I'll be married in August.

      And she doesn't read /., but we have a lot of mutual friends who do.

      And I don't need more brownie points.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  60. That's it! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 1

    That's it! After reading this article about Linux babes, I decided to install BSD right now!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  61. Isn't that a little young? by Frag-A-Muffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about the rest of you, but I hope my kids don't take a liking to computers at such a young age. I'm going to try to keep them away from computers for as long as I can. I'd rather them "play" the old school way. Take them outside as much as possible. Make them do more physical activities.

    --

    AirSpeak - http://itunes.com/apps/AirSpeak
    1. Re:Isn't that a little young? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      All things in moderation. There is much to be said for exposing children to a computers at a young age, so long as it does not become their only activity. Certainly outdoor activity is vital to a balanced childhood, but so is education and training in basic tools and technology.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  62. These are best practices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The adults in the family help guide K.D's computing experiences by setting a good example to follow with a few routine practices. These include logging out when we leave the computer for more than a minute or two, closing applications that we are not actively using ...


    I would hate to work on an OS that couldn't deal with leaving several applications open. Fortunately, I use ... Linux. (What is he talking about?)

    As for logging out whenever they "leave the computer for more than a minute or two." That would be a hopeless pain. I don't know whether the issue is security. (just lock the screen) or sharing (no good answer for Linux*) But logging in and out all the time and starting and stopping applications along the way is too much like work.

    *Wouldn't it be cool to be able to switch between multiple GUI login sessions without having to close one out before opening another. I suppose I could get this to work by using a simple GUI login that runs VNC client, and then have the "real" login sessions running as VNC servers. I wonder how well that would work...

  63. and K.D.(E) will grow up, marry G.Nome, and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lo, their son flux will be the star of the family.

  64. Not a surprise by elhondo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm pretty sure a lot of four year olds have been posting as AC's for quite some time.

  65. Rare Occurence I guess by TheFairElf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I suppose that a female using Linux is such a rare occurence that it merits a Slashdot front page post. Where I come from, which is the Windows world everyone uses Windows, Office et al., it takes us 2 minutes to delete a file, 5 minutes to search for something and lots of dumb blondes with stupid questions

    1. Re:Rare Occurence I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see you have a lot of fine interactions with the female contingent.

      Sorry you're so bitter. But the article is actually about a small child (could as well have been a boy; the reference is to 'Babes in Toyland').

      --Linux-using-Babe (of the adult sort... well, prob'ly too old for you).

  66. "K.D." as in KDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is "K.D." her real initials? Or did the author make that up. If they're real, then did her parents name her after their (or at least her mother's) preferred desktop environment? (KDE) Seems a little too coincidental to me.

  67. Then she went to Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And saw Sesame Street the numbers game. Too bad it was for Windows only.

    Then her and dad went to one of those online game sites for kids. Too bad it was for IE only.

    Then they went to another kid's site and the buttons didn't work. There was some kind of VBS error. Weird huh?

    Then they tried to watch an Elmo video in real format. Dad spent all afternoon trying to compile mplayer with real support. Too bad dad couldn't get the mplayer gui to work.

  68. REDUNDANT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your entire post was worthless. Needs to be moderated as redundant.

    Don't go around trying to make karma off what other people post. Be original.

  69. Re:a heart warming /. story.... get out... no real by westlake · · Score: 1
    most kids do not have a linux system administrator as a father

    what they are likely to have is a parent who has been using Windows the last ten years

    care to guess which system they are teaching their kids?

  70. The grammar ape strikes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gorilla's can do that and even form sentences

    Unlike certain human's !

    1. Re:The grammar ape strikes by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? That is a sentence with a grammatical error.

  71. Worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You shouldn't have printed this story. Now the poor 4 yr old will be sued by SCO!

  72. 4 year old kids!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they post on slashdot too???

  73. Re:a heart warming /. story.... get out... no real by troon · · Score: 1
    This girl will probably use linux for the rest of her life.

    Just like all those kids whose first computer experience was ENIAC are still using punched tape...

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  74. My daughter has her own computer by Stone316 · · Score: 1

    for years now. She's 4 and started using mine when she was about 2. At the time I didn't think she was old enough to use a computer but we bought a box of cereal that had a Mr. Potatoe head game in it. She wanted to play it so I popped it into my computer. There's this one game where Mr. Potatoe Head breaks a picture into 4-6 pieces and you have to put it back together. I glanced away for a sec and then I heard, "All done". I looked back and she had it put back together, I didn't even know she knew how to use a mouse. So after that we bought some more games for her (mostly all educational where games teach numbers, letters, colors and lately more advanced games.) I thought about putting linux on her computer but in order to use flash sites (which kid sites are full off) you need to be running moz 2.6. The flash plugin is alot faster than earlier versions. But then I realized she must have about 30 games for the windows platform. I don't think its worth the effort to put linux on her computer and try to get these games running under wine or somesuch. My daughter is 4.5 now and my son is 2.2 and they can put any game on by themselves and play it. The cdroms are getting a bit dirty tho. Linux is all and good but there are no educational games out there for it and personally I don't think its the right platform for my kids right now. When they get older and need to do papers for school then it will be a different story. Personally i'm not a big MS fan but i'm not a linux Zealot either.. I try to pick a platform that suits my needs. And what I see in that article and responses on its website, is that there are alot of linux zealots out there who can't see the forest through the trees. I don't think they realize some of the great software their kids are missing out on. For my server at home I run linux... On my desktop I run Linux and Winbloze. On my kids computer I have windows.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:My daughter has her own computer by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      "My daughter is 4.5 now and my son is 2.2"

      Versions 4.5 and 2.2? My kids are still in the alpha stage.

    2. Re:My daughter has her own computer by tverbeek · · Score: 1
      "My daughter is 4.5 now and my son is 2.2"

      Versions 4.5 and 2.2? My kids are still in the alpha stage.

      Mine are vaporware. "Sure Mom, I'm gonna have some grandkids for you Real Soon Now. I'm gonna call the first one Duke... Duke Nukem."

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  75. Knoppix4Kids by OmegaGeek · · Score: 1

    Open Source Educational Foundation and Tux4Kids have put together Knoppix bootable CD for kids. I showed it to my daughter a while ago, and even though playing on the computer isn't really her favourite thing to do (she'd rather ride her bike and look at books - what's with the kids today?), she did enjoy some of the games. TuxPaint in particular was a big hit.

    If you really want to prevent your kids from accidentally causing problems on your system, this could be a nice alternative. Heck, burn a few copies of the CDs and put them in the kiddies' lunchboxes as they head off to school; I'm sure the schools would love to have kids booting a different OS on the computers in the school computer lab!

    --
    Even heroes have the right to dream
  76. I'm not surprised by jht · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My not-quite 2-year-old son has been "using" an old iMac for a few months now. He used to watch my wife and I on our computers, and would scoot up to take the mouse from us and try clicking things. So I took a 4-year-old iMac we had around, set it up minimally, and installed a few kids' programs (Jumpstart Preschool, Finding Nemo, and a couple of others), and set it up so he could just wake it up, grab one of the programs in the Dock, and go to town with it.

    He mastered it very quickly. Now he calls it his "Mac-y", and asks to use it almost daily. We let him have a half-hour or so at a time, and he's picked up a decent amount of skill very quickly. He likes doing letter drills the most.

    Funny anecdote: one of the first times we let him use it, he was having a little trouble pointing the mouse properly. I went to help him position it, and he pushed my hand away and said "No!". After a minute, he figured it out himself. Now I help him with very little and don't volunteer it - I wait for him to ask.

    And a pet peeve: Why do all kids' programs require the CD to be present? Don't you know we can't trust a toddler with a CD? I have to make .DMG files out of each one, and have them automount at startup so he can use all his programs.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    1. Re:I'm not surprised by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      And a pet peeve: Why do all kids' programs require the CD to be present?

      It's the same for Windows, but a little less convenient to work around. I bought a CDROM emulator and used it to rip the kids' games into compressed image files that get stored on a Samba server. Then, I wrote a little batch script that I can put an icon on, and when the kids double-click it, it loads the image file with the same name as itself.

      Since most of their CDs are autorun, all they have to do is double-click the icon for the game they want to play, and it starts running automatically. They have about 20 games at their fingertips without any kid-error-prone CD swapping.

      There's more than one way to skin that particular cat.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:I'm not surprised by b0bby · · Score: 1

      For my kids' W98 machine I copy the cd to the drive, then make a shortcut calling a .bat file which does something like:
      subst e: /D (in case another game is still mapped to e:)
      subst e: c:\games\clifford
      e:\start.exe
      I've only come across one title which doesn't work with SUBST. There may be some similar way to trick the Mac games.

    3. Re:I'm not surprised by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      There's no reason to pay for a CD-ROM/DVD-ROM emulator when you can get a good one for free. Daemon Tools mounts common CD image formats, and emulates the most common copy protection programs. The only problem that I can think of is that the default GUI isn't very user friendly, but I think you can get frontends for it.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    4. Re:I'm not surprised by jht · · Score: 1

      On the Mac what I do is use Disk Utility to take the CD and make an image file (.DMG) of it. Then I stuff it away and put an alias of the .DMG in the Startup Items - allowing the CD images to automount. It works just fine, but it's a pain to set up.

      The apps can't really tell the difference between a mounted disk image and the actual disk, so it works. The irritant is that the complete install for all these apps installs everything onto the HD anyway, the disk check is really just for copy protection. And it's so easily bypassed (at the expense of twice the disk space used total), that it's just stupid in the first place.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    5. Re:I'm not surprised by Smurf · · Score: 1
      There may be some similar way to trick the Mac games.

      Actually, there is no need to trick the Mac games. jht (the user you responded to) made disk images of all the CDs, so he actually doesn't need the physical disks. You can mount any number of disk images simultaneously and that works as having the CDs mounted at the same time. Additionally, he made them automount at startup, so all his son's games are automatically available all the time.

      jht is complaining because you can't just copy the CDs content to a directory without some weird trick like disk images or scripts like the ones you wrote.

    6. Re:I'm not surprised by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Nifty! Thanks for the tip.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  77. Dan Quayle, is that you? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    for years now. She's 4 and started using mine when she was about 2. At the time I didn't think she was old enough to use a computer but we bought a box of cereal that had a Mr. Potatoe head game in it

    Mr Vice President? Good to see you here at last. You know, I, too, never learned the Java language because my travels never took me to Indonesia.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  78. Astroturf? by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    MS don't need this kind of thing. Everybody knows that a four-year old can use a computer if you lay the icons out nice and easy on their desktop. I'm sure many thousands of four-year-olds all over the world are capable of clicking on an icon and using a program. All my kids have their own profile on XP on our computers. They love it - customising their desktops, trying to guess each other's passwords...

  79. Gah, sorry, forgot to select plain text by Stone316 · · Score: 1

    my bad.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  80. WagEd == Microsoft PR firm Waggener Edstrom by JessLeah · · Score: 1, Informative

    (For those of us who don't know these things by heart)

  81. Re:Sad. by troon · · Score: 1

    vi. No, wait...

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  82. Not quite as easy on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What kind of work do you need to get done? Writing and printing documents, spreadsheets? Sending and receiving emails? Browsing web pages? Designing web applications? All can be done on Linux just as easily as on Windows, provided you're trained in the appropriate Windows or Linux programs."

    It is not quite as easy. There are far fewer programs on Linux to do these things as there are on Windows. So you have to spend more time finding the right program that meets your needs. There is a greater chance you might not even find the right program with Linux.

    The situation is improving, and the gap is narrowing. The Linux community looks to the future. It is not like the Mac community, where mac zealots say "If there is no program to do it on the Mac, it is not worth doing" or "having lots of different programs is a BAD thing: it confuses the users".

    1. Re:Not quite as easy on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Linux community looks to the future. It is not like the Mac community, where mac zealots say "If there is no program to do it on the Mac, it is not worth doing" or "having lots of different programs is a BAD thing: it confuses the users".

      Hey look, I'm replying to a troll. Mac zealots don't say that, you dipshit. Mac zealots say "I don't want your shitty Windows port, Apple made a program that does this and it has a prettier interface."

      Besides, having lots of different programs IS A BAD THING. It fragments the community, it fragments development, and more often than not it makes standards difficult or impossible to agree on. It dilutes any effort to make utility/plug-in programs.

      Do you think that Linux as a webserver would be anywhere near where it is if everyone had not standardized on Apache? If there were only a few mod_whatevers as a result?

    2. Re:Not quite as easy on Linux by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 1

      For some specialized tasks, I'd agree with you, but for the general ones I listed (I guess excluding web development), there are plenty of capable applications for Linux.

      It's true that application support is lacking in Linux when compared to Windows, but that doesn't mean the Linux OS itself is worse; and in time, that disadvantage should clear up. It's the old catch-22, though. Can't use linux without applications, and few companies want to write Linux apps until more people start using Linux.

  83. So who followed the same procedure as me? by Beek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    - Read headline, click on article
    - Quickly scroll through article looking for pictures of this "babe"
    - Found none, went to comments
    - Found out she was four years old
    - Forwarded michael's email address to perverted-justice.com

    1. Re:So who followed the same procedure as me? by kolcun · · Score: 1

      This is the funniest thing I've read all day. /m

      --
      --- Mike Kolcun
    2. Re:So who followed the same procedure as me? by Mordaximus · · Score: 1

      Mine was different:

      -Realise that babe doesn't mean what many people believe it does.
      -Provide Proof
      -Recommend remedial english classes to poster.
      -Enjoy article.

  84. Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically for by Stone316 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    a person. In this case its his daughter but same could be said for other types of people. I could go home and install linux for my parents and customize it for their particular needs. Chances are, if I did my job correctly, they wouldn't have too many issues.

    However, the issue arises when an average user has to do some setup themselves.. They buy a new printer, digital camera, etc. Thats where the issues are now in linux. On Windows you put in the cd that came with the product and a few clicks later your ready to go. I think most of us are aware of the issues you can experience in linux.

    Yeah, his kid has knows how to use a computer but newsflash, tons of kids do. My daugher has had her own computer since she was 2... Now if his kid could use a cash register and count out correct change i'd be impressed.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
  85. Reminds me of that dinosaur film by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    "This is linux, I know this!"

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    1. Re:Reminds me of that dinosaur film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said Un*x not Linux. Must be one hell of a smart kid though.

  86. I'm very disappointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over a hundred comments, and still no links to grown up Linux Babes. What has happened to Slashdot?

  87. Two and a half? by elmegil · · Score: 1
    By the time she was two and a half years old, she was "helping" us by moving the mouse or pressing keys on the keyboard -- generally at the most inopportune moments.

    Heck, my son's been doing this since he was about 1.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  88. s/Eric Raymond/ESR/g by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod! Or is it GNU/ESR?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  89. Kids know how to generalize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    To a child an icon is an icon it doesnt matter what color it is or what it looks like. They see an icon , they double click, something happens. If its not what they expect they click the next icon until the something they are expecting happens. This is how they seem to learn so seemlessly. Adults have had it beaten into them that the world is static, children understand that the world is dynamic.

    Specialization is for insects - Lazarus Long

  90. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats not a troll, it's offtopic, but its not a troll

  91. You're a Troll by soloport · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So why am I headded over to my friend's house (a VP of Marketing -- no dumbass) this morning to help him get his printer to work on Windows?

    I help CPAs, Morgage Brokers, etc., every single day with the same crap people say makes Linux "hard".

    Look, computers are hard. Can't people see the forest for the religeous trees?! When you get used to one environment, anything else looks "foreing". That makes it real convenient to say "that... that... thing! It made me work at figuring this... this... thing I don't even have to think about in my world."

    You are just adding more religeon to the noise. Windows is much harder to learn -- in many respects -- as is Linux. You just don't run into many folks (yet) who've had to go the other direction: Linux to Windows.

    I've been using Unix for twenty years. Last environment used (before switching to Linux) was Solaris. Let me tell you, young whipper snapper, when I had my first try at Windows (1998). I about had a nervous breakdown.

    I still don't like Windows XP verry well. It just doesn't feel right. Everything is so fucking hard to get done in that stupid practically-windows-only environment, with a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?! Morons.

    You're missing the very fact that in many, many cases, when "things don't always work right" you can't even get them back to working whatsoever -- as you watch Windows eat itself alive and laugh at you while it makes you play "pin the tail on the problem". It blindfolds you!

    Some people have paid me thousands to fix their Windows problems. Simple stuff, like getting printers to work or their Outlook to quit behaving "weird". Thousands, because they keep asking me to come back to do more -- install this software, fix this little glitch, remove this spyware my daughter installd ("my computer's slow"). Translation? "It's too hard for me to do it". In my opinion, it is Windows which isn't quite baked enough and ready for anyones' desktop.

    You want "easy"? Then everyone should be using a PDA or maybe a Mac.

    1. Re:You're a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... needs more bold tags.

    2. Re:You're a Troll by FattMattP · · Score: 1
      a VP of Marketing -- no dumbass
      Are you kidding me? It only takes a year or so of working in corporate America to realize that the phrases "VP of Marketing" and "no dumbass" are mutually exclusive.
      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    3. Re:You're a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool post. I don't need to say any more -- you've hit the nail on the head.

    4. Re:You're a Troll by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      A minor nitpick, but if you have visualStudio installed, "cmd.exe" does autocomplete. Quite well, I might add.

    5. Re:You're a Troll by naelurec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the simple answer is "under the hood" Windows is significantly more complex and difficult than Linux. When the gooey goodness on Windows breaks, it tends to be very difficult to get it fixed.

      I do lots of admin -- I found lately I have been on an upswing fixing Windows boxes and realized that so many times the "solution" is a reinstall. Yikes.

      Within the last 48 hours, I have two instances where a full system reinstall is the "solution" -- someone was troubleshooting an email issue on w2k and a OEM tech support person (wireless card) said to reinstall drivers several times. Eventually this broke something in winsock which caused ALL network functionaility to break.

      After googling and talking to other techs, I came to the conclusion the only way to fix this problem properly was to reinstall all of Windows. Of course, since his network access was severed, backup was done to floppy disks (it was an older laptop) -- yikes. For an issue that wasn't even initially a problem with Windows cost this particular individual 2 days of productivity getting his system back in order.

      Another system (WinXP Home) when booted up one morning simply reboots over and over again. The safe mode doesn't even work -- hangs on "mup.sys". Blech. No rhyme or reason why this stopped working, no one really seems to know WHY this occurs and so far, seems like the "fix" is a reinstall. Great.

      Of course, this was only the two recent issues. But even things like spyware infections have required me to reinstall the entire system and spend hours reinstalling programs, downloading security updates, reconfiguring, etc.

      Needless to say, from an administrative point of view, while *nix definitely felt like a lot larger learning curve, I have found that it makes more sense and is a lot more logical. Infact, I'd much rather admin a *nix box when issues happen than a Windows box (even though I did get a MCSE and have been using Windows for 14 years) because quite frankly, it is possible to troubleshoot whereas Windows-- blech.

    6. Re:You're a Troll by admiralfrijole · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, OS X has never given me any of these types of trouble. Got a new printer? Plug it in. *Maybe* install drivers from the CD, but thats as simple as feed it the CD, double click on the installer, click OK half a dozen times and go. Spyware? Nah. Even if there was a "top" and a "kill -p $PID" would take care of that. Maybe even a "rm -rf" Even my grandma can use the terminal to find a process and kill -9 it.

      --
      e to the pi i plus one equals zero
    7. Re:You're a Troll by B'Trey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I strongly suspect that you're a troll but I'll take a few moments to reply for the benefit of those that may take you seriously.

      First, I'm not a zealot. Computers are tools. They aren't spouses or lifemates or religions. They're just tools that do a job. I use Linux for two reasons. One - it's cheap. I run a web server, a mail server, a couple of mailing lists, a DNS server, etc. on my home network (seven machines.) I simply can't afford to purchase Windows server software to do all that. (Well, I guess I could afford it - I make a decent living. But I simply refuse to lay out that kind of cash for what I'm trying to do.) Two - it's powerful. It drives me batty that Windows doesn't have decent scripting and command line tools. Some of that is correctable (Cygnus, Perl, etc) but some of it is not (the lack of links on the file system.) And some of the stuff that is technically correctable can't be done because I can only install approved apps on the server. (I work as a system administrator for a government system.) I've been working in both Windows and Unix environments for a long time.

      You're right that there are people who have no business sitting down at a computer. They simply don't grok them, and no amount of training seems to get through to them. For those people, it doesn't matter if it's Linux or Windows or OSX. It's hard.

      You (and other posters to this sub-thread) are also right that Windows has hard problems too. But I run a network of seven computers at home, four of which are Linux boxes and four of which are Windows boxes. (My laptop dual-boots, for those who noted that those numbers don't add up.) At work, I have two independent networks - one is unclassified and one is classified. There are about 60 machines on each network, all of them Windows. I spend more time on Google researching problems on those four Linux machines than I do researching problems for over 120 Windows machines.

      That isn't a scientific study. It's my personal experience.

      But to me, the key thing is that when I have no clue how to accomplish something on Windows, I can usually start poking around the menus and options and figure it out without having to hit Google. With Linux, I sometimes have no idea where to even start, and I'm not a Linux newbie.

      One quick case in point. I was about ready to pull my hair out last weekend. I moved a hard drive from hdb to hda last weekend. Before moving it, I was mounting hdb as the root of my fs, with LILO installed on the mbr of hda. I configured lilo.conf, and did a chrooted lilo, shutdown and moved the hard drive. My system went scizophrenic. It claimed it was mounted hdb as a ReiserFS system when it was actually mounting hda as ext3. You Linux gurus probably already know what I did - or rather, didn't do. I didn't update my fstab when I moved the hard drive.

      I'm sure that there are a number of horror stories people can post about things they did or problems they've had with Windows too. I've got a few myself. But things like this consistently pop up to bite you in the ass with Linux, and all too often you don't even know what to Google on to find the answer. (I never was able to solve this problem on Google. A newsgroup post get the answer for me a couple of days later.) They happen in Windows too, but not near as often. In many ways, the additional complexity of Linux that causes problems is the very reason for that additional power I was praising just a few paragraphs up. I'm very aware of that. I'm not knocking Linux or praising Windows. I'm simply saying that, in my experience, Windows is much easier to administer than is a Linux box.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    8. Re:You're a Troll by soloport · · Score: 1

      Uh, I think if you re-read my original post (i.e. the whole thing) you'll see we're in agreement, there. (Read to the very end.)

    9. Re:You're a Troll by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Excellent points. Linux is harder than windows in many respects. I've been running Debian as my desktop machine (booting into Windows less and less frequently, I think the last time was a couple months ago). Some stuff is just harder to do on Linux, file sharing with samba is a pain to set up, network printing, embedded movies in webpages are pretty flaky etc etc. And yet I still use Linux as my main machine because I can accept that tradeoff for the added power that I have using the command line, and how I haven't had to reinstall in 3 years and my system runs faster now than ever.

      It's always a tradeoff.

    10. Re:You're a Troll by admiralfrijole · · Score: 1

      yeah, i just wanted to add that i never had any problems either

      --
      e to the pi i plus one equals zero
    11. Re:You're a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The command prompt auto-completes on filenames, but it doesn't autocomplete commands

    12. Re:You're a Troll by merdark · · Score: 1

      Wow. What an ego you have. It constantly amazes me how older folks can sometime be so completly out of it with respect to reality.

      So anyone who doesn't agree with you is now a "Troll"?

      Can't people see the forest for the religeous trees?!

      Where oh where did religion come into play here? If anything, it's you who are using cult tactics to cloud the issue here. You start out your argument by first branding your apponent as a heretic ("Troll"). Absolutly typical.

      Then your proceed to accuse the original poster of somehow being a religous zealot, which is really a comment out from nowhere. The function? To furthur distract people from the fanatisim in your own post. If you are accusing someone else of fanatism, certainly you yourself are not a fanatic.

      You are just adding more religeon to the noise.

      Again, religon has nothing to do with anything here. You are reinforcing your branding. So far, we have your branding and your *claim* that you are forever fixing windows problems.

      I've been using Unix for twenty years. Last environment used (before switching to Linux) was Solaris.

      Wow. So this is supposed to give your argument some sort of authority? I've been using Unix and Windows about equally. I've used Irix, Solaris, AIX, Linux, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, DOS/Win3.11, Win95, Win98, WinNT, Win2000, and WinXP. And yes, I've actually used all these systems for a significant period of time, more than just dabbling with 'ls' or 'dir'. I can assert my authority just as easily.

      Let me tell you, young whipper snapper

      More disparaging of the original poster. Again, as with the troll comment, this is intended to make the original poster look unathoritive and stupid. At the same time, this furthur attempts to assert your superiority. Can you not make a reasonable argument without all the manipulation?

      when I had my first try at Windows (1998). I about had a nervous breakdown.

      Fear mongering, "WOW, the experienced Unix user almost had a nervous breakdown! That must be terrible!". Of course, this comment really doesn't say anything about the usability of Windows as much as is does about your bias against windows. Evidence of this bias? The uncalled for troll comment for one.

      I still don't like Windows XP verry well. It just doesn't feel right.
      Great objectivity there. This comment has no value other than to assert your bias.

      Everything is so fucking hard to get done in that stupid practically-windows-only environment, with a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?! Morons.

      This shows a lot of fanatism and fear mongering. I can show you things that are "so f**king hard", but using a GUI computing environment is not one of them. Windows only environment? Yes. And when you use Linux, you are in a Linux only environment. This is the definition of an environment.

      DOS does autocomplete btw, but that's not really important. What *is* important is that on Windows 2000/XP you should only need to go to the command line for two things. One, to run ipconfig, and two, boot into the recovery console in case something disasterous happens. Everything else can easily be done through the GUI. Really, in all my time using XP on any one of my friends and families machines, these are the only reasons I ever needed to bring up a command window.

      You're missing the very fact that in many, many cases, when "things don't always work right" you can't even get them back to working whatsoever

      Really? Funny that I've never encounted such a problem, nor have any of my friends or family. In fact, I've not even *heard* of such a problem with windows from any person I've met. I only hear of these terrible problems from manipulative slashdot comments by people who admit to not even using windows.

      as you watch Windows eat itself alive and laugh at you while it makes you play "pin the tail on the problem". It blin

    13. Re:You're a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/OS X/WindowsXP/ and I could say the same about installing printers

    14. Re:You're a Troll by crizh · · Score: 1

      I've done the same with my hd's at least once and although it was a slight PITA (these things never go quite as planned) I wonder how Windows would have handled the same change...

      I did an upgrade about 18 months ago where I replaced the entire system board and processor. I must have been dual booting win98 and MDK9.0 at the time. MDK just booted right up, got a lot of error messages and complaints and it probably took about an hour to get all the kinks worked out, but it worked.

      Never did get that win98 install working again...

      --
      Trust The Computer, The Computer is your friend.
    15. Re:You're a Troll by soloport · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is, you missed my point entirely -- and you have trouble recognizing tounge-in-cheek (e.g. "whipper snapper"). You must be rather young (ok, that was another tounge-in-cheek statement ;-)

      People take for granted that "Windows is easy" and "Linux is hard" when in reality, it is probably more about familiarity. Computers, in general can make life easy and they can be hard to learn. That was my point. Nothing more.

      Sure, I probably went a little over the top to make my point. But that's what you can get from people when they feel like a minority.

    16. Re:You're a Troll by redtux1 · · Score: 1
      Linux: If you are using a distribution with that comes preconfigured for desktop usage, like Redhat or Suse, then you can go through cups configuration (which probably has a graphical frontend). There have already been stories on slashdot about how hard this is. Even ESR couldn't easily get it to work, and he uses Linux for a living.

      I am so tired of this being parroted out as if it were true

      Just tested on FC2 using the supplied printconf

      Startup up printconf
      Click new
      Choose windows printer
      click on the one in the list you want.
      save

      Only gotcha is user is not put in, this is a simple thing, edit the queue, type in guest

      This is far easier than wrestling with windows

      For example we have a jetdirect network printer, 2 mins on my linux box, wont at all on w98, need the driver disk on xp.

    17. Re:You're a Troll by merdark · · Score: 1

      Well, this was a perfectly fine post, and not at all inflammatory like your last post. My point was that most of that last post was unnessary and insulting to the original poster and people who have similar opinions.

      People take for granted that "Windows is easy" and "Linux is hard" when in reality, it is probably more about familiarity. Computers, in general can make life easy and they can be hard to learn. That was my point. Nothing more.

      This is true. But there are still areas where Linux is much much more difficult than Windows regardless of familiarity. This is not something that needs to be defended, but rather recognized and fixed. Many of these areas are in fact actively being worked on by various projects, so things will only improve. Linux has come a long way, and no one is denying that, but it's still not there yet in some areas.

    18. Re:You're a Troll by merdark · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I never had any trouble with CUPS either, but ESR did and so did a computer science grad I know who uses Linux for a living. So clearly there are some problems somewhere, which is why I used this example.

    19. Re:You're a Troll by delstar+dotstar · · Score: 1
      ...a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?!
      You can edit the registry to get tab completion.
  92. Re:Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically by Coryoth · · Score: 1

    However, the issue arises when an average user has to do some setup themselves.. They buy a new printer, digital camera, etc. Thats where the issues are now in linux. On Windows you put in the cd that came with the product and a few clicks later your ready to go. I think most of us are aware of the issues you can experience in linux.

    This seems to be the most common complaint about Linux usability these days - it used to be about the horrible hard to confugure GUIs (ever tried writing FVWM2 config files - easy if you know how, but it can take some real work if you are learning), but now it is about not being able to plug in hardware you buy.

    Except this isn't a problem with Linux - well, in as much as Windows is no better. If the manufacturers shipped with a CD full of Linux and OS X drivers and no windows drivers you'd have as hard a time on windows as you do on Linux - probablyharder in fact.

    As Linux becomes more widely used - and that is happening, look at the corporate desktop) more and more manufacturers will ship Linux drivers with their product. Then this Linux usability problem will simply evaporate as if it had never existed.

    Jedidiah.

  93. In the 0th Plymouth... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1
    ...apparently primates are not that advanced...
    "Another thing they were interested in was in defecating and urinating all over the keyboard," added Phillips, who runs the university's Institute of Digital Arts and Technologies.

    Eventually, monkeys Elmo, Gum, Heather, Holly, Mistletoe and Rowan produced five pages of text, composed primarily of the letter S. Later, the letters A, J, L and M crept in.
    Link.
    1. Re:In the 0th Plymouth... by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Actually they are. Check out:

      http://www.cwu.edu/~cwuchci/

      Chimps have been communicating with computers in experiments since the 1970's.

  94. Daddy I wanted a playstation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That kids deprived, get her a Playstation FFS.

  95. Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by bonch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Microsoft posting this kind of story and passing it off as real news = "astroturfing."

    OSDN-owned Slashdot posting OSDN-owned Newsforge's story and passing it off as real news = nobody says anything.

    If some Windows company owned a news site that was always posting anti-Linux stuff, people would be up in arms, but it's okay for OSDN to do it with Slashdot.

    Off-topic I know..."No Karma Bonus" unchecked accordingly.

    1. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by aastanna · · Score: 1

      nobody says anything

      um...you just did. A bit self-defeating?

    2. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh* When someone says that, it implies nobody else is saying it, so they feel the need to do so themselves.

    3. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it's not true? If not, it seems a pretty well-thought-out hoax.

    4. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but I don't see this one as a problem. There are special rules for giants. One of Microsoft's problems is that they behave as if they were still a tiny startup instead of a dominant force in their industry. You are not allowed to beat up on the little kids, but the little kids are allowed to hit back.

    5. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh...anyone see a double-standard?
      Microsoft posting this kind of story and passing it off as real news = "astroturfing."


      What I see is someone who doesn't know what "astroturfing" means. /. is not attempting to hide the source of the article.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    6. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i didn't really see any anti-MS stuff in the article but I did see pro-Linux stuff.. if an MS owned news site posted pro-Windows news, i don't think anyone would be pissed about it. we'd all laugh because they'd be blatant lies, but no one would be up in arms (except those that are already up in arms, but you can't do anything about them now can you?)

    7. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody said anything about "allowed" -- it's just that the content is still crap no matter who put it out. The fact that people like reading astroturf shows them to be rather stupid, don't you think?

    8. Re:Uh...anyone see a double-standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Newsforge" portrays itself as a legitimate IT news journal. Unless they want to rename themselves "Zealotforge", this is astroturf.

  96. Re:Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You obviously don't use Windows much. 99% of the time I can get a windows driver installed and working right the first (or maybe second) time. Especially if I ignored included CDs and go download directly from the manufacturer.

    Ever try to get wireless working on your linux machine? Using PCMCIA on a laptop? Go try that with anything that you just bought off the shelf because it was cheap and tell me how the Linux vs Windows installation is. And I'm not even talking about the driver itself, I'm talking about which #@$! file gets updated (and don't start with "use the gui then" because the gui didn't even recognize the card) and what it needs in it to work.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  97. And another thing... by soloport · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My family uses Linux -- and only Linux. Not because I'm a Linux zealot. They use it because it's what they know. It's what they know because it was the only environment their dad could put together that would not require him to become a full-time system administrator, at home.

    We have six kids (now age 9 - 19). Thus we've always had many computers around -- the kids spend equal amounts of time with PS2, TV and PC.

    We've tried Windows many, many times. We always go back to "easy" Linux. It just runs; We all know it; It offers us all the games we need; Got tired of hearing "IE sucks", "Outlook sucks", "Office sucks", etc., etc.

    Had I been able to make more of a living, sooner in life, half of them may have had Macs, by now. The others would probably still be happier with Linux.

    Again, it isn't about Linux, Windows or Mac. It's about what is most familiar.

  98. Windows autocomplete by flonker · · Score: 1
    Windows Autocomplete:
    In Windows XP or 2000, go to HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor and change the value of CompletionChar from its default value of 40 to 9.

    From http://www.2000trainers.com/forums/viewthread.php? tid=692
    1. Re:Windows autocomplete by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      autocomplete only works for the local drive in cmd - still pretty crippled...

    2. Re:Windows autocomplete by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      whoops - should have said 'local _directory_' ie it doesn't look along %PATH% for stuff to run.

    3. Re:Windows autocomplete by xtinct · · Score: 1

      now that's user-friendly!

    4. Re:Windows autocomplete by poulbailey · · Score: 1

      > now that's user-friendly!

      TweakUI lets you enable this as well. It almost doesn't get more userfriendly than that.

  99. i started at 18 months by Cheeze · · Score: 4, Funny

    I started my kid at 18 months. I setup my file server to start up gcompris automatically. I highly recommend it. It has age-based programs from coloring programs, to advanced math skills.

    I started off with him just adjusting the monitor and sitting on the keyboard. 4 months later, he's still doing some of that, but he's much more interested in the sounds, using the keyboard, and moving the mouse around. I have him using a cheap $20 trackball (the crappy one with the lights in it) and he still hasn't broken it.

    I fully expect to have him doing basic tech support for his mom when he's 3. by the time he's in school, he'll probably be the only toddler with his own laptop.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  100. What's the youngest? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

    My youngest turns 3 next month, and he's already logging in with a username (his first name) and a password (one letter). I had them set up on XP for some time with no password, just click on the picture. His brother, who is 4 now, started right before he turned 3 and never had a problem logging in that way. He even taught me a few things about XP, like how to easily change the picture by your name.

    When I got them started on Linux, they took right to it. They love it because there are so many games. I've got the flash plugin installed so that they can still play the online games at cartoonnetwork.com, looneytunes.com, etc., but they love tuxracer, too.

    Little kids have no problems with any of this stuff. But, remember, these boys will sit there for 3 hours just clicking stuff to see what it does. The main problem with adults is lack of patience (or time) and an apprehensiveness about clicking on the unknown.

  101. The Kid Comment by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

    We were all surprised when on the second day K.D. asked her mom to log out so that she could have her login. The obvious sense of power and control that having her own user ID gives her is beyond my ability to put into words.

    Power? Control? Ummm... I guess this person doesn't have kids.
    I have an (almost) 5 year old. "DADDY! I want to watch the Power Rangers! (Yellow Ranger is rather cute...) DADDY! I want to play Lego Racers! DADDY! I want to play Jedi's! (Star Wars: Jedi Academy).

    So this kid learnd the word "log in"? My son knows something too:

    Smart Kid

    (yes, that's really my son. It was recorded about 2 years ago)

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  102. don't forget dependency hell by Stone316 · · Score: 1


    Normal upgrades because a royal PITA because of dependency hell.. Thats one issue that definately needs to be addressed.

    I can see it now, you buy a digital camera and it actually comes with linux drivers. You try to install it and it says:

    XYZ is needed by ABC.

    So you upgrade ABC and you get
    123 and 456 need to be upgrade first, 456 needs 789, etc, etc.

    Not accurate but you get the picture.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:don't forget dependency hell by ninewands · · Score: 1
      Quoth the poster:
      Normal upgrades because a royal PITA because of dependency hell.. Thats one issue that definately needs to be addressed.

      Two little commands work together to solve that problem ...

      #apt-get update
      #apt-get upgrade

      takes me all of about 20 minutes one time a week to keep my Debian "sarge" (testing) box up to date. Some folks put it in a crontab so it runs overnight, but I'm too paranoid for that.

      Beats the heck out of the two hours it took to install the last Windows 2000 Service Pack I loaded on my SunPCIii card at work.
    2. Re:don't forget dependency hell by elmegil · · Score: 1
      Last time I did this on a Debian box it blew the hell out of my system. Now, it was "woody", which is unstable, but it was a hard disk image of a knoppix distro so I didn't have any options to change to whatever the stable Debian distro is.

      Yeah, apt-get is great when it works....but if it doesn't, the impact is severe. I had to reload.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:don't forget dependency hell by BoysDontCry · · Score: 1

      Ok. You're confused. "Woody" is the stable version of Debian, and "a hard disk image of a knoppix distro" is not Debian. It's based on Debian, but it's not Debian. It's Knoppix.

    4. Re:don't forget dependency hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually sid which is unstable, woody is testing. Depending on when you installed it, knoppix could have been either unstable or a mix of testing and unstable. If it was a mix, it's not too surprising that an update could mix things up a bit.

      I didn't have any options to change to whatever the stable Debian distro is.

      Just change the apt-get configuration listing to what you want it to be, make sure you have the right repository sources, then do a dist-upgrade. It should change you to a pure version of whatever debian version you specified.

    5. Re:don't forget dependency hell by elmegil · · Score: 1

      When I asked for advice on my issues, I was told "what do you expect running unstable". Sorry I don't keep up with stupid names that bear no obvious relationship to the actual reality. Yet another reason why Linux is hard to use; everyone thinks they're clever naming things after other things instead of just calling them what they are.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  103. The old circumsicion argument by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    A bit off topic, but I just had to listen to a similar argument used for circumsicion. He'll be different from every body else, so you better clip the tip of his penis off. I figure if he's that worried about fitting in when he's older he can make that decision himself.

    Or the truly disturbing one.
    "I want him to look like me when he's older".

    I never understood that last one. Do the kids eventually say - "Uh no Dad, lets not compare units today."

    1. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't make that much difference when it comes to fitting in. You're not removing that much material...

    2. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      Scripture says so, that is the reason why I was circumsised. It is one of the remnants of Judiasm in Christianity, the sign of the original covenant with Abraham. As far as practical matters are concerned, it is supposedly more cleanly.

    3. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm circumsized, and i really dont mind. In my environmental systems class i'm one of only 2 guys, one day we had a sub and the other guy was gone, some of my friends got the teachers medical dictionary and started flipping through it, and pointing out certain penile diseases to me. Some of those pictures are unbelivably disturbing. Theres so much that can go wrong with an uncircumsized penis, i cant imagine the health benifits alone aren't enough of an argument.

    4. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      As far as practical matters are concerned, it is supposedly more cleanly.

      No supposed about it. It lets a boy get less dirty / grow less dermal bacteria.

      OTOH, washing it out every day has the same effect.

    5. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Bytes2go · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But I'm not and I've never had any problems.... cause my Mommy taught me how to wash my peepee with soap & water every day (which some guys seem to find difficult to accomplish)..... I think of it as a 'natural' penis cause that's the way mother nature made it... you have foreskin for a very good reason, although I don't think man has quite figured out what that reason is... things don't just evolve without a purpose or a reason. I think its for protection from things like abrasion, etc...

    6. Re:The old circumsicion argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, When was the last time you heard someone say.

      " Hello Bob, lookin strong as the mighty Oak man."

  104. sure, sweetie, just use vi by mmuskratt · · Score: 1

    Yeah, honey, just pop on out to the command line, and I'll show you how to configure TCP/IP, and then we can configure the device drivers! You only need to know a little bit of code...which I won't tell you, it is located online, super easy to find.

    --
    man rtfm
  105. To summarize by bonch · · Score: 0, Redundant

    When translated, your post reads:

    "Uh, I disagree with you, so you're automatically a troll! I'm headed over to someone's house to fix a Windows printer, so that one instance invalidates the 95% of the time that drivers automatically work under Windows, and somehow also invalidates that a lot of printers almost never work under Linux.

    Oh, and Windows XP doesn't 'feel' right. I'm actually going to offer this as some sort of proof of my argument! I'll vaguely claim it eats itself alive!

    You troll. How dare you point out the obvious--Windows is easier to configure than Linux!"

    1. Re:To summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself, Windows zealot. Btw, your website sucks ass too. I bet you spent a lot of time on it. Too bad it blows. Hahahahahahaha. Pathetic little pseudo-intellectual nerd boy.

    2. Re:To summarize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Preach the truth, my brother. Don't listen to those Linux zealots.

      Just because some Linux zealot has been using Unix for 20 years and therefore is more comfortable with Linux than Windows certainly doesn't make that the norm. While I am attempting to learn more about Linux, I grew up with Windows. The Linux users surely must be smart enough to realize that they are an anomoly.

      For the average person, Windows is much easier than Linux. Linux has made strides to change this. I just don't believe we are there yet...

    3. Re:To summarize by ImpTech · · Score: 1

      Oh please... and your whole argument against his post is unsubstantiated statistics, paraphrasing, and an obscene amount of exclaimation points.

    4. Re:To summarize by pherthyl · · Score: 1

      Your post is amusing because it proves the parent's point while you're trying to disprove it.
      Windows is easier for you because you grew up with it. Unix is easier for the parent because he/she grew up with it. The average person grows up with Windows so the average person finds Windows easier to use.

    5. Re:To summarize by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative
      so that one instance invalidates the 95% of the time that drivers automatically work under Windows

      I use Debian with udev and hotplug (which are quickly becoming defaults). When I boot my computer, it automatically finds and configures everything I have attached to it. When I plug in my USB palm, it loads the appropriate module so that Kpilot can sync with it. When I plug in a keychain drive, it loads the appropriate module and mounts it. All of my printers worked with the drivers shipped with CUPS. I plugged a PCMCIA NIC into my laptop, and it beeped after it loaded the driver and configured the network. My sound card Just Works. My USB mouse Just Works.

      Why do people still think that Linux is in 1997? I know that there are some annoying driver problems, just as there are in Windows, but the vast majority of hardware I've come across does the right thing without intervention.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:To summarize by bonch · · Score: 1

      Why do people still think that Linux is in 1997?

      Because 80% of the time, someone can't take home the new device they bought and hook it up to Linux. Gee your soundcard and palm and USB keychain worked. Congratulations.

      Just because you use udev and hotplug doesn't mean squat--Linux has plenty of hardware support to catch up to. My scanner has never worked under Linux, and from the looks of it never will. Many, many people have hardware problems with Linux that require hours of hacking to fix.

    7. Re:To summarize by ninkendo84 · · Score: 1

      Because 80% of the time, someone can't take home the new device they bought and hook it up to Linux. Uhh, that would be because major device manufactures don't bother *making* linux drivers. So you have to wait for the kernel devs to make them for you. Think of how it would be if no hardware manufacturer made windows drivers, and you had to rely on microsoft drivers for everything you use. Because in that respect, linux is *far* better with device drivers.

      --

      $ make love
      make: don't know how to make love. Stop
  106. Scanreg /fix by spockman · · Score: 1

    That VP of Marketing needs how to learn to run scanreg /fix after an F8 and getting a command prompt. People I have taught this too don't seem to call as much anymore. It fixes 90% of Win 95-98 problems. WinMe and XP, teach them about restore points. 2000, I have never had many calls on that one!

    1. Re:Scanreg /fix by soloport · · Score: 1

      That VP of Marketing needs how to learn to run scanreg /fix after an F8 and getting a command prompt. People I have taught this too don't seem to call as much anymore. It fixes 90% of Win 95-98 problems. WinMe and XP, teach them about restore points. 2000, I have never had many calls on that one!

      I know the problem he's having and it's hardware related. The only point I was really trying to make was: Computers are hard -- apparently a point lost on the other trolls replying to my post (because I didn't positively support their religeon).

      Very good tip, though. Thanks!

      And for the poster who just skimmed my original post: I said, these problems are a daily thing, not just occasional. Also, I'm certain if the world were dominated by Linux, I'd have just as much work to do. Ok, one more time: Computers are hard.

  107. mutually exclusive? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

    I belive you mean oxymoron? Or perhaps "literate" and "FattMattP" are Mutually Exclusive too? ;)

  108. Closing applications? by nuggz · · Score: 1

    I keep hearing about this, but why?

    I just leave stuff running, if I'm going to use it again, what do I gain by closing it.

    The memory gets swapped out, shouldn't use any CPU cycles. Even the desk space shouldn't matter, minimize it, or throw it on another desktop.

    For most applications I see this as about as outdated as rebooting.

  109. We grew up with them by felis_panthera · · Score: 1

    I don't remember not having a computer in my home. I think we got our very first computer (some kind of Radio Shack Tandy machine... it used the TV as a monitor) when I was 4 or so (1984). It ran cartridges and spoke BASIC... by the time I was 6, I ran cartridges (in the machine) and I spoke BASIC (near fluently) and my decades long love affair with technology began.

    The point is, it's not a case of the ability... anyone CAN use a computer... it's a matter of drive... fewer people really WANT to use the computer. For most people I know, the Web has replaced TV as their primary source of entertainment. Aside from a few games, very little else is done with their machines.

    But the real question is when will us techies replace the TV repairman in all of those porn movies?? *grin*

    --

    The chains are broken
    Loki is free
    Ragnarok is at hand...
  110. HOW TO INSTALL LINUX by earthstar · · Score: 1

    I hav a pIII 64 MB Ram, 20 gb HDD (4 partitions, c:2,rest around 5 each )comp , running win98se,winxp. I wanna try out linux--and i dont understand what suse ,kde,knoppix,mandrake & the like mean.... So can u help me out to quickly install linux on my machine (without removing win98 ),hassle free, and us try out linux... [ i don think i hav ever seen/used linux machine, -- but i hav worked on a sco unix machine for a few days...) Linux Enthusiasts???

    1. Re:HOW TO INSTALL LINUX by doon · · Score: 1

      Get yourself a KNOPPIX ISO (http://linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=44). Burn this to a CD and you should be able to play with a linux system without having to touch your Windows install.

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    2. Re:HOW TO INSTALL LINUX by earthstar · · Score: 1

      Dude! Forgot to mention one inportant thing...iam on dial up connxn [best 5kbps i get]. so u know what 700mb image file does to me.....

    3. Re:HOW TO INSTALL LINUX by doon · · Score: 1

      IF you want shoot me an e-mail with your Snail Mail address & I will burn you a copy and send it to ya, use patrick (at) muldoon (dot) us

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
  111. Not rare by The+Asmodeus · · Score: 1

    I haven't had Windows on my computer in years. My daughter, who is now 5, has only used it for the past 2 years and can "surf" with the best of them. My 2 yr old daughter is now getting into it and they love the flash games on certain websites and other programs like Tuxracer and Tux Paint.

    The 5 year old is already asking how the computers "talk" to each other and wanting to do a webpage. I'm proud..

    Someday I'll get a "My child can hack your child's computer" bumper sticker...

    1. Re:Not rare by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

      Just go to your neighborhood Kinkos and print one out yourself and put it on your car. :-)

  112. Must be an Austin thing by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    This was pretty much my experience. Both my children started out on Linux, but this was before there was a GNOME desktop. I gave them an easy to use environment based on a very customized tvtwm and .xinitrc.

    Years later, as teenagers, they mad ethe switch to GNOME with no trouble. I'm sure KDE would have been as easy for them.

    My wife, who loathes computers, has learned to use Linux as easily as Windows. She detests them both equally. 8^)

    Once upon a time, it took a fair bit of work to make any *nix easily usable by those not coversant with *nix. Today it's every bit as easy as Windows. Some things are easier, and some harder. But speaking both as the goto guy at home and the IT manager of a 350+ system network running Linux, MacOS, Solaris, W2K and XP, and occasionally HP-UX, Linux is doing at least as well as anything else (with some Mac exceptions) on the user front, and as good as anything from the computer and network management perspective.

  113. As a learning device by digidave · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've found that my three year old son has learned spelling, phonics, fine motor control and problem solving at a far greater pace than his same-age cousin due to using a computer.

    I bought my son a used computer when he was two as a present for potty training. He generally runs Windows because of all the educational games, but does use my Linux computer for some games.

    My best tip is that your kid should learn to login themselves... it's a great way for them to learn to spell words. Change up the password every week or so and tell them which word it is. My kid learns to spell five or six letter words in a day or two.

    Anyway, despite possible problems with creating a computer nerd with no social life, I think two and three year olds should always have a computer available to them. Just limit the time they spend on it.

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  114. Then it failed... by bonch · · Score: 1

    It is about refuting the claim that Linux is "hard" to use.

    It didn't refute anything. Nobody's going to buy that Linux is magically not hard to use simply because someone took the time to set it up for someone so it was easy.

    What if you don't have someone to set it up for you? I'm sorry, but I've been using Linux since the mid-90s, and I've taken days and weeks out of my time to set things up sometimes. Even Eric Raymond had trouble setting up a printer...remember?

    All the article showed is that, as long as you make sure nothing will ever need to be set up or anything, you can have a 4-year-old use one of Linux's GUIs. This is true of any operating system.

  115. Give me a break by bonch · · Score: 1

    This girl will probably use linux for the rest of her life.

    Why? All she's done is used a Windows-alike GUI. If anything, she'll switch to Windows when she wants the apps her friends are using (and wants to play The Sims 5), and when she wants to connect to a shared printer or install a soundcard...

  116. My 5-year-old uses Windows... by bonch · · Score: 1

    ...so what?

    Seriously, I don't see how this proved anything other than someone let a 4-year-old point and click one of Linux's GUIs, as though that proved that all of Linux was easy...nobody is gonna buy that.

    Try having her install a kid's game sometime...my 5-year-old knows how to insert the CD, click "Next", etc. I'd love to see a 4-year-old mess with RPM package managers...

  117. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, they are not a troll. The parent poster is incorrect about bush, but they are not a troll, simply an idiot.

  118. Use IceWM on your P1 by gosand · · Score: 1
    I don't know what kind of P1 you have, but it's been my experience that modern linux distros (Mandrake, SuSE, RedHat) run like crap on anything less than a p2-333.

    Seriously, use IceWM or some other lightweight window manager. It will make all the difference. I got a free P90 laptop, and it is unusable with KDE on it, but IceWM makes it work. Not all that fast, mind you, it is still a P90. But it is usable.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  119. How do you like them apples? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://rrfn.hackerstavern.com/Wallpapers/linux-chi ck2.jpg

  120. If you want 'easy' the way you define it... by WebCowboy · · Score: 1

    Then the best option is a Mac, then perhaps Windows and Linux in a tie for second, IMHO...

    Yes, Linux systems can have issues during install, config and so on. However I find the issues to be not much different than with Windows. In both platforms, setting up a local printer is trivial--a smart 4-year-old could probably do it (in Linux certain apps have issues using the printer more than in windows I suppose). Setting up a NETWORK printer in Win OR Linux can potentially cause grief.

    Setting up a network I found was actually EASIER in Linux until Win2k and later (I remember when you even looked at network settings the wrong way WinNT and 9x wanted to reboot). The issues are the same with both. The one point you make that is true is the wireless networking issue--MS is further ahead there since drivers are more readily available (mostly for "political" issues rather than technical). However it's still common for Windows users to just plug everything in and turn it on--and have wireless networking completely unsecure, then there is a completely DIFFERENT set of problems. I suppose a good side effect of being troublesome to set up in Linux is that the users that manage to get it working are tech-savvy enough to know the importance of setting up a SECURE wireless connection.

    In my experience recently, I've found that newbies get their PCs with XP pre-installed, they plug it all in and everything "just works"...for about a week. By then (because they didn't run windows update to patch everything right away) several exploits/worms/spywares will have infested the system and various other freeware (as in beer)/demoware/adware and other cruft will slow their shiney new 2.4GHz P4 to a 386-like crawl. Linux and Mac systems of course are much less vulnerable. Once you set them up they "just work" and STAY that way so even a four year old can play with it and grandma can send her emails.

    Is Windows easier to "know" and set up? perhaps in some ways. Easier to maintain and keep healthy? HELL NO. If you want that get Linux, and if you also want "easy too know", spend a bit more and get a Mac system.

  121. Offtopic complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    INSIGHTHFUL? What the FUCK are you mods smoking today?

  122. Same here by soloport · · Score: 1
    I've had many clients hit with malware or other issue and have learned the best solution is a re-install -- for nearly all major problems.

    That's solid TCO for you!

    I know a guy who "has forgotten more about how Windows works than I'll ever learn". He thought I was nuts about being so trigger-happy with re-installs until I asked him two questions:
    1. So you think you could go through the registry, etc., and clean it up and fix this problem? Yes.
    2. So I've estimated the job at 3 hours for a re-install and recovery of his data. I'll pay you to fix the problem your way. Can you do it within 3 hours? No.

    It's cool to know lots about Windows and be able to fix it the "right" way. But it's often much more expensive to work through problems than to just do a clean installation.

    Conclusion: Use your Windows knowledge to blow time on your own systems; Don't waste the client's money.
  123. Who's the troll? by Nplugd · · Score: 1
    Everything is so fucking hard to get done in that stupid practically-windows-only environment, with a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?! Morons.

    This can be changed in XP with regedit : HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Command Processor
    Create/edit the binary value named "PathCompletionChar" to activate directory auto complete, or "CompletionChar" for file auto complete.
    set it to :
    • 9 to use TAB
    • 4 to use CTRL+D
    --
    Je n'ai pas d'avenir Je n'ai qu'un destin Celui de n'être qu'un souvenir C'est pour demain
  124. Printer woes on OS X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "On the contrary, OS X has never given me any of these types of trouble. Got a new printer? Plug it in"

    I see that you qualified it with "new printer". If you have a 3 or so year old perfectly good printer lying around, you have to go out and buy a damn dongle to plug it in because Macintoshes have lacked standard printer ports for years. Yet, almost all of the newest PC's (whether they have Windows or not) have standard printer ports along with the USB ports.

    The same goes for standard serial devices

  125. Uh...no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If some Windows company owned a news site that was always posting anti-Linux stuff, people would be up in arms ...
    I got news for you. Microsoft has cheerleading news sites all over the place, not to mention astroturfers who post to them (much like you). As someone else already mentioned, MS comes under greater scrutinity precisely because they are in a position of enormous power and have been proven in a court of law to have abused that power. So I would say that no, there isn't a double standard here. Or are you going to now say that OSDN has as much money and market cap (and, by extension, power) as Microsoft?

    Didn't think so.
  126. So...Conditioning is not just for hair. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I don't think that all the users are dumb.
    I do however think that Microsoft has encouraged that mindset. They first gave the world an OS that was limited, and crashed far more than what the alternatives demonstrated it needed to be. This of course had two effects. One it frustrated users who needed to get work done, and it created the perception that computers are more fragile than we know they are. (Oh no! I broke the computer.) Second Microsoft created a "we know better than you" dependency. Ever wonder what happens to people who aren't encouraged to use their own faculties? MS products are a demonstration of what happens, were people are apathetic to any kind of learning (plus the pavlov response of "change this and you might break it"). Throw in the usual stuff (lock-in, too hard to get out, mass-brainwashing "MS is the one true way"), and you see why all the alternatives (no matter how good) have had it rough. So no the users aren't dumb, it's just that no one has set high expectations for them (discouraged it, even), and that kind of trap is hard to get out of (just look at what welfare has done to the social fabric).

  127. Linux hasn't been hard to *use* for ages.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its the installation, configuration and maintenance. The article isn't really even about Linux its about a few friendly applications and the logon feature. I converted my mother over to Linux a couple years ago and currently my wife has been using it for a little over 2 years (babe in tuxland).

    Its never been the day to do that causes problems, it installing new hardware, needing to change configurations, its all the little things people do in Windows and with their Apples everyday that quickly become monsterous with a Linux distro.

    Managing a Linux workstation still requires a level tolerance and patience that the average computer user doesn't/shouldn't have. I use it because I love using it, but there are times I'd like to throw the whole box straight out the livingroom window.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  128. Huh? by Ydna · · Score: 1
    My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D., hasn't had any trouble figuring it out, and if she can do it, you can too.

    K.D. had watched her mom, my wife, and me using the various Linux-based computers...

    So, K.D.'s grandfather is married to her mother? WTF?

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  129. You're a Troll-In for a pound, out with a penny. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But to me, the key thing is that when I have no clue how to accomplish something on Windows, I can usually start poking around the menus and options and figure it out without having to hit Google. With Linux, I sometimes have no idea where to even start, and I'm not a Linux newbie."

    That's assuming there's a discernable link between those options and menu's, and the underlying problem.

    The other problem's with you post can be summed up as.
    Hard==Lack of knowledge
    vs
    Hard==Have the knowledge AND I have to do the hokey pokey, walk on my hands, and drink a glass of water.

    There is a difference, and it is an important one.

    "Windows is much easier to administer than is a Linux box."

    That depends on what you have to "administer (goals and problems)" staying within the boundaries of what the programmer coud see

    As far as your personal experience of having to do more to get things accomplished. That practically begs the issue of why are you changing things so much? At least with linux once you do something, it doesn't spontaniously break on you.

  130. Re: double-standard? How right you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No it is not a double standard. It is the truth.
    Anything microsoft does, and we all know this by now, is only intended to increase the wealth of its board, directors, etc. Not to benefit its users.

    Anything done by FOSS is intended to promote and protect my, your, and everybody's freedom - and ironic as it is, that also includes butt-head balmer and scott mcnoodle.

    And what freedom is that? Freedom from monopolists
    because the DOJ certainly dont protect us from them!

    What profit can be made by the "KD" story just posted anyway?

  131. Erm, you prove the point then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've been doing it for 10 years. If you've been using Linux or Windows for 10 days I'd say you are in better shape with Windows. Especially given theres more likely to be a Windows user living next door to you than there is to be a single Linux user in your entire town. (yes, yes, but most people you mention 'newsgroups' or mailing lists to will just stare back blankly. much less actually know how to get help via one).

    1. Re:Erm, you prove the point then. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Windows has exactly 2, two things on Linux right now. Device support, and Install support. It's very hard to take an application or package in Linux, and just make it work. Some devices are hopelessly broken (xircom cardbus cards anyone?).

      That is Windows advantage, and that is being eroded quickly.

      Not that I don't somewhat agree with you, but honestly, how many of your neighbors could roll back a restore point on XP after Windows Update fubar'd their computer? Really?

      -Chris

    2. Re:Erm, you prove the point then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows has exactly 2, two things on Linux right now. Device support, and Install support. It's very hard to take an application or package in Linux, and just make it work. Some devices are hopelessly broken (xircom cardbus cards anyone?).

      Funny coincidence.
      Those are both things required to get your computer to do something useful.

    3. Re:Erm, you prove the point then. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Au contraire (sp?). While installation support is great for the initiated, untrained user, it's superfluous to someone like myself who does his own package management.

      The same with device support. It's nice to know that on windows, any device you purchase will come with a driver for you to use. It's a bit more annoying to have to take the linux hardware compatibility list with you whenever you go component shopping.

      Without great, all-encompassing device support, and dumb-ass user installation tools, I still get useful work done. My mom wouldn't necessarily like it, but even she can get her email, access her recipes, and play the odd game of mahjongg.

    4. Re:Erm, you prove the point then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike your mom, not all users have the luxury of tech support from the guy living in the basement.

  132. Grandchildren Vs Grandparents by telebear · · Score: 1

    Sure it's easy enough to get a 3 year old to use Linux... I wonder how many people have been able to get their grandparents to use Linux.

    It seems like a great challenge because grandparents are filled with preconceived notions about computers being hard to use, viruses, technology, etc.

  133. Re:Mission, and heres the statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey man relax...have a couple of prozacs.

    The whole point of the article is that contrary
    to popular opinion, at least that opinion which is promulgated, paid for, and pushed by microsoft,
    Linux is not a horrible dirty communistic anti-american viral alien.

    Rather even a baby/child can use it and have fun with it.
    Just remember there are only two differences between FOSS and Proprietary software.
    and these are in order of importance:
    #1 - FOSS stuff is free and Prop. stuff is not.
    and ...
    #2 - duh I can't remember #2

  134. Get 4NT by jimsum · · Score: 1

    I also really missed filename completion when I went from UNIX to DOS in the early '90s (I also missed aliases to convert "ls" into "dir" :-). I found a product called 4DOS, which is still available as 4NT (and other O/S). This is a very nice shell program; I can't say if it is the best choice, but it's good enough.

    http://www.jpsoft.com/

    --
    -- Pot is safer than Beer
  135. Newsflash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux-minded dad strips down a Linux desktop to the bare essentials - then says "Look Linux is easy to use!"

    Give me a fucking break.

  136. Socially Acceptable... by killfixx · · Score: 1

    Some (limited) of what you say has merit...but for the most part not...Most people in this country need to work 2+ jobs just to make ends meet for 1 person...with cost of living (rent, heat, elec, food - absolute necessities) deducted from his pay the average guy making minimum wage makes about $-300/mo. (assuming one job, 40 per week)...Add one child (single parent) and that figure changes drastically...in order to afford rent (without public assist.) That person has to work approx. 100+ hours per week. there's only 168 in a week...when does he have time to sleep let alone see his/her kid. I know...I went from $35/hr with a partner also making $1000 a week to being a single dad trying to make ends meet when I got laid off and she left. That left me trying to find work while paying all the same bills...Sure I have some nice stuff now...but I can no longer afford even the simplest pleasures that I used to. Coffe in the morning has become an expendable luxury item. This book (I currently work at a B&N) is quite the eye opener for the average person making enough to pay the mortgage/rent in one week (single income or dual income).


    NIckel & Dimed

    Obviously it depends on some degree where you live, but I've lived all over the US and wherever the cost of living is low that means there are approx 2 jobs and they both pay crap. The cost of living has increased at a pace not equalled by earnings. Before Nixon you could buy a house with a years salary (modest) and a car with a months salary (again modest). Now the average person spends about a years salary on a car and 5-10 years salary on a house...if they can afford the down. It's a lot harder than it used to be...I don't like it when people assume that everyone spends beyond their means...

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  137. You live in Bizarro World by g_bit · · Score: 1

    Either that or you're lying.

    1. Re:You live in Bizarro World by hogger · · Score: 1

      I don't know if he's lying or not, but he's definitely not living in bizarro world. FWIW, I've got three kids (3-16), each has a linux PC, my desktop and laptop are linux, my wife's desktop is linux and her laptop is an ibook. Not a single windows PC in the house. We'd probably have more macs if we could justify the cost, but linux windows managers have matured so much in the last year or two that os x just doesn't seem worth the expense.

      What's so bizarro about this world?

  138. The fact is by michaelbuddy · · Score: 1

    Why does everyone even try to bring up the simplicity competition, when even that is so subjective. With Kids, things don't always have to 'make sense' where to click. Everybody needs a little (or a lot) of guidance starting computers. And after that, a little time to gain their muscle memory. So many people will say, Mac is easier, Linux isn't there yet, Windows is satan. Most people learn tasks on a computer a little at a time. I work at a software company and i train my company's sales reps. Good software gets challenged all the time because people don't 'get it' the first time they see it. I'm sorry, if you want people to get it so quickly, then prepare to remove some functionality. I love my atari 2600, but I can't do much with it, even though it's simple. We are balancing between a ton of easy devices that do one thing good, or using 1 complicated device (interface) that does it all. So you want clutter on this end, or on that end? plug and play is great, makes sense. I'd say it's a necessary focus to get linux to top dog status. But I've gotta say, if I can download some software for free, and install it on as many machines as I want, that is much easier to me, than than having to save up all the money for each copy like I would with Mac or Windows. I like not having break laws to get things done. If you run through mechanicals a few times, it gets easy. whether gui or command line.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  139. Sad but true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IAAAP (I am also a parent)

    I always hated when people would "bore me to death" with their kid stories. So as a parent, I *try* (not always successfully) to not bore other people. But it's hard. I don't know why that is. Because even as a parent, I'm still bored to tears by other people's kid stories. But I still have an insatiable desire to pass along *my* kid stories.

    It's also true that parents think they have the smartest kid in the world. My sister and I almost can't even be civil with each other any more because I always feel like she is trying to "1 up" me with how much of a genius her kid is. Personally, I think he has a learning deficiency.

    1. Re:Sad but true by Ripplet · · Score: 1

      Of course that's all true, and to prove it, do you know what my son did the other day, he... ha ha, just kidding.

      Actually it's just evolution, you know how hard it is to raise kids, nature had to give you some incentive.
      I mean literally, after the first six months of becoming a parent, I was beginning to wonder how on earth the human race survived, why weren't our ancestors thrown out of the cave after the first few weeks of screaming?

      But hey, it's not sad, it's just the way things are. And I know for sure, just to really get to you folks that are still on your own, my kids are the best thing that ever happened to me. I can't believe how much I love them, they are fantastic, wonderful darlings both of them, and I know they always will be, whatever they do.
      It may be just evolution, but heck, it sure feels great!

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    2. Re:Sad but true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I know they always will be, whatever they do.

      Wait until your son is about 15 and starts smoking pot and drinking beer. That will be a lot of fun when he mouths off to you and tries to sucker punch you in the jaw because you took his skateboard away from him. And when your 14 year old daughter comes home with a tatoo, a nose ring, and tells you she's pregnant by some 29 year old crack smoking black guy from the hood. And that she's madly in love with him and plans to have his baby and spend the rest of her life with him.

    3. Re:Sad but true by Ripplet · · Score: 1

      Well, at least that gives me another 9 or 10 years! If I'm lucky! And you know what, I'll still love them, in fact I'll probably just be jealous that I didn't get to do groovy stuff like that when I was that age.

      Anyway, by that time I'll probably have left my family for some 16 year old hussy myself, so I won't be one complaining...no honey I was just joking, no, put down the knife, gently please, no wait eeerrrrggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhh............at least, aaaarrghhh, let me submit this firrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.......... ...........

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

  140. Idealistic, aren't we? by lysium · · Score: 1
    Only if you teach them to think like that....

    Ah, if only that were true. Do you expect people to raise children in isolation? People live in a social matrix. You can only teach your kids so much before they go out into the world and meet others. You can try to engineer your neighbors, censor intrusive media, and homeschool your kids, but the stupidity of other people and the nastiness of the world is going to creep in through the slighest flaw in your shield.

    You can try to raise your children ideally, but be prepared for the time when they learn all the things you do not want them to learn, and then throw it in your when they start to differeniate themselves from you.

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
  141. Slashdotted by LqqkOut · · Score: 1

    Damn, of course the real linux chicks can't take the load ;) Who's got a .torrent?

    --

    -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

  142. Could you spew some more nonsense? by g_bit · · Score: 1
    I find MS Windows more difficult to fix than Linux.

    We'll when you basically have to "fix" everything in Linux to get it to work right in the first place, you get a lot of practice at it.

    ...on MS Windows there's nothing to try except "install it again".

    And that is still easier than what you have to do on Linux, where you have to hunt down all of the support libraries before you can make your program.

    Installing a driver for that new wireless card? On MS Windows: click here, click there, click everywhere, futz with wizards for five minutes, maybe it works. On Linux: cp, insmod, ifconfig, working.

    Having a GUI configuration app and spending 5 minutes with it takes a lot shorter than the time it took you to figure out what commands to run in the first place...or did you just "know" to type those commands? Good one.

    Your last comment so obviously lacks merit that I will not even attempt a reply, except to say that you are a blithering idiot. Have a nice day.

  143. Amen Brotha by g_bit · · Score: 1

    The article is a Troll.

    1. Re:Amen Brotha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think what you meant to say by "the article is" is really code for "I am".

      HTH

  144. Actually System Restore comes with Windows by g_bit · · Score: 1

    And, that's all you would need for any of these problems, none of that Norton crap is worth a dime.

    1. Re:Actually System Restore comes with Windows by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Norton does fix some things and prevents you from using system restore. Norton also speeds up some things that system restore wouldn't do.

  145. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh... i'm pretty sure the poster wanted people to react to the statement "2000 election - bush gets more votes in florida." because, i hope you remember, bush *didn't* get more votes... the whole rigged election thing...

  146. The real difference by g_bit · · Score: 1
    I can setup Linux to allow her to delete mommy's data just as well as Windows.

    The real difference is that it's easier to secure files in Windows than having to understand how the hell to use chmod and what '777' means.

    1. Re:The real difference by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "The real difference is that it's easier to secure files in Windows than having to understand how the hell to use chmod and what '777' means."

      What? How?

      Linux: by default, nobody can delete anyone else's data.

      Windows: "This file is write-protected. Are you sure you want to delete it?"

  147. In the 0th Plymouth...<----- by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Somebody didn't RTF subject....

  148. Re:Linux is not hard to use if setup specifically by elmegil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh yes, stating simple facts makes me a troll. I know a lot of people much smarter than I who have had the same types of problems with wireless cards--but all just different enough to not be able to help each other. Gotta love the slashbots.

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  149. ChildsPlay by WarmBoota · · Score: 1

    My One year old loves ChildsPlay (gentooers: emerge childsplay)

    He moves the trackball around and randomly clicks. He loves it when he actually clicks an animal and it makes noise.

    I feel more comfortable giving my son access to my Linux box than I do giving him access to his Mother's Windows machine - even though I have more important data on the machine. I know that I can easily lock down his desktop and prevent access to devices / applications that he doesn't need. I could probably do the same in Windows XP, but I know that Windows wasn't designed, from the ground up, with multiple users in mind. It just makes more sense.

    --
    90% of everything is crap. Also, crap is relative.
  150. Because what can you do with Linux? by g_bit · · Score: 1
    I just setup a media pc for my living room. I built the pc myself, installed WinXP, updated it, installed the ATI media software, updated it, now I've got my own Tivo.

    This took me all of 5 hours and I used all packaged software...I didn't have to even look at a command line or know how to use the "make" command.

    You just can't do this with Linux, unless you've spent a lot of time figuring it out already.

    I'm sorry but a house full of kids with all Linux *is* bizarro world because it's not normal. All of their friends use Windows, all the good games come out for Windows, and all the good professionally written, professionally packaged, and easily installed software is written for Windows.
    1. Re:Because what can you do with Linux? by hogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It's all relative to your skill level and available dollars I suppose.

      What you did, from your perspective, might seem cut and dry and inexpensive to you. You built the PC yourself. It's safe to say that some would say it's bizarro to expect the user to build their own PC. Some would say it's bizarro to expect the user to fork over all the money for WinXP when open-source alternatives are available.

      From my perspective installing mythtv or freevo on a debian box requires no more effort than installing XP, rebooting, visiting windowsupdate, rebooting, visiting windowsupdate, rebooting, installing ATIs software, rebooting, updating ATIs software, etc... I can have a mythtv box setup from absolute scratch (box of parts from newegg.com) in less than 5 hours.

      I too have a multimedia PC in my livingroom. It's based on linux. It took very little time to get up and running. It can:
      • rip dvd, encode to divx
      • play divx
      • pause live TV (mythtv)
      • host recorded TV files (mpeg) for any PC in the house
      • play games (mostly UT2004)
      • play mp3s

      I'm sorry but a house full of kids with all Linux *is* bizarro world because it's not normal.

      I'll agree that a house full of kids using Linux isn't normal. If normal is what you're shooting for then feel free to point your gun at the ground and shoot. I'm sure you'll hit your target.

      All of their friends use Windows

      Yes, most of their friends use Windows. Most of their friends are normal. Most of their friends' parents drive SUVs. We don't have an SUV. Should I go buy an SUV?

      all the good games come out for Windows

      We play a lot of Unreal Tournament 2004 at hour house. Is it not a good enough game for you?

      and all the good professionally written, professionally packaged, and easily installed software is written for Windows

      I've run out of patience on this one. You're clearly clueless.
  151. Babes in Linuxland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://forum.microsuck.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi? ubb=get_topic&f=5&t=001003

    No nudity, but a couple of the images are a little racy (e.g., TUX image "strategically" pasted).

  152. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "2000 election - bush gets more votes in florida." because, i hope you remember, bush *didn't* get more votes... the whole rigged election thing..."

    Every time votes were counted, Bush won. The sore losers attempted to rig the election by counting voteless ballots as "votes for Gore" and by giving him the Buchanan votes, but the tamperers lost and the voters won.

  153. Oooo, one game is written for linux...point taken! by g_bit · · Score: 1
    Hahahaha! I'm clueless? You think that because you can run Unreal Tournament that you've proved anything?? For every one game that is released for Linux, 1,000 games are available for Windows.

    Installing Windows software consists of my clicking "Next" for a little while. Installing Linux software goes something like this (taken from the MythTV user guide):

    The runtime manager for shared libraries, /lib/ld.so, gets information about the locations and contents of shared libraries from /etc/ld.so.cache, a file created by ldconfig from information in /etc/ld.so.conf. Because MythTV installs some shared libraries in /usr/local/lib, that directory needs to be added to the list of directories for ld.so to search when doing runtime linking of programs, if it is not already there. You do this, as root, by editing /etc/ld.so.conf, then running ldconfig. There are many ways to do this; one that works is to enter this series of commands:

    $ su -
    # echo /usr/local/lib >> /etc/ld.so.conf
    # /sbin/ldconfig
    # exit
    $
  154. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so interesting about a woman using a hemoroid treatment?

  155. So true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My parents raised *7* of us children on 1 chemistry professor's salary at a 2 year college in central Utah. (Utah is NOT known for high educator salaries.) None of us went hungry. Since then I've been extremely sceptical of people who "need" 2 salaries to "get by".

  156. Script Kiddie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This gives the word "Script Kiddie" a whole new meaning..

  157. Re:Oooo, one game is written for linux...point tak by hogger · · Score: 1

    I suspect you probably paid lots of dollars for your MCSE training, please don't take it too hard, but yes... You're clueless.

    You said "all the good games come out for Windows", so I pointed out one hot-off-the-shelves game rather than listing every game that's played in linux. I didn't realize I was dealing with clueless moron that can't google before he spews nonsense, so here's a nicely formatted list of games that run under linux:
    http://icculus.org/lgfaq/gamelist.php

    Most clue-burdened linux users don't install from raw sourcecode, so your mythtv install example isn't really applicable. Open source software developers usually don't like to provide a package for every fricking linux distro out there, so they provide the source. The typical user installs packages via the package manager that their distro employs. Assuming the correct software sources are utilized, here's what a typical user might do to install mythtv:

    Mandrake users: urpmi mythtv
    Gentoo users: emerge mythtv
    Debian user: apt-get install mythtv

    If the above term "software sources" confuses you, consider it analagous to "best buy" for a windows user such as yourself, minus the driving, money, and bloatware.

    Trust me, I know how to do this stuff in Windows. I did it from windows 3.1 forward, I did it in DOS, I did it in OS2, I did it on C64, Apple II, Timex sinclair, and now I do it in Linux. I don't the impression, however, that you've ever really given linux a chance or ever hung out with any real live linux users. It just aint that hard. You may be a bonafide windows guru, but when that prompt in front of you is a bash prompt you are absolutely clueless. Stick to what you know.

  158. Whoa, 311 games for Linux by g_bit · · Score: 1

    Lookout, the family's gonna have fun tonight!

    Trust me, I know how to do this stuff in Windows...but when that prompt in front of you is a bash prompt you are absolutely clueless. Stick to what you know.

    Gee, I can program the sh*t out of C/C++ but yeah, that bash prompt is soooo intimidating ;)

    Now, you wouldn't perhaps be lying by saying that all you have to do to get a Linux app installed is to type one command would you?? Because I've done plenty of Linux software installs and there is a little more to it than that. Editing numerous config files comes to mind...

    1. Re:Whoa, 311 games for Linux by hogger · · Score: 1

      Whether you can code C or not seems irrelevant to this discussion. I think you're just trying to avoid my assertion that you're not qualified to bash linux. If you've done plenty of linux software installs and you've never stumbled across esoteric things such as package managers, then you're either a masochist or you're lying. My vote is for masochist.

      Yes, most linux applications are installed with a single command. It probably sounds bizarro from your perspective, but it's true

  159. My dad did something similar.. by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

    ..back in the day. Our first computer was a 386 that ran dos and intially a gui called dosshell.

    The way my father set it up was to put all the games on floppy disks, then write on the disk's label the filename of the .exe needed to execute the game.

    Then, he simply taught me to switch to the A: drive, type the filename, and hit enter. I could then enjoy all the games I wanted when the computer was free.

    Later, of course, he turned dosshell back on so I could get a feel for mouse work, but that initial dos introduction to computers certainly put me ahead of many of my classmates in later years.

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  160. Not so new by Banjonardo · · Score: 1
    The concept isn't too new- I imagine most in the older Slashdot crowd have been playing with computers for a long time, but are only now able to understand the long-term effects of it as an educational tool. Another interesting event to watch is that a lot of kids who grew up on the Internet (we're 16-20 or so) are now old enough to contribute. It's interesting to see how differently we think- I personally am 18 and have been on the web for at least six years. I wouldn't DREAM of using a phonebook, or asking for directions when I can mapquest.

    The resources we're used to completely change our thought processes. It's funny to watch movies as recently as from the 80's when the hero is stranded somewhere and, wait, why doesn't he just use his cell ph.....oh, yeah!

    --

    -----

    Score 3? For what? Being wrong, at length? - smirkleton

  161. Incestuous linux lovers by tanguerilla · · Score: 1
    My four-year-old granddaughter, K.D., hasn't had any trouble figuring it out, and if she can do it, you can too.


    K.D. had watched her mom, my wife...



    yeah, that's just wrong...

    1. Re:Incestuous linux lovers by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Well, you know what they say: If you can't keep it in your pants at least keep in in the family.

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
  162. Idealistic? No, just too many cynics and pesimists by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    My father, a few weeks before dying, told me that all the money he made was not enough compensation for all the time he did not spend with us.

    I have learnt from that (that is why we have brains, don't we?) and in spite of social pressures I have changed my life accordingly (I would be damned if I work a single minute of overtime or weekends specialy without compensation). Doing fine, thanks.

    The lessons are there for all to learn, to each one his own.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  163. For non-Linux using kids/schools/families... by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 1

    ...Remember that a lot of good Open Source software (like my Tux Paint, for example ;^) ) do run outside of Linux.

    TP runs on Mac OS X, pretty much all 32-bit versions of Windows, BeOS, BSDs, Solaris... etc. :^)

    What I've always wanted, though, was a Mac OS classic version. There are still plenty of schools who have older Apple hardware, and just can't use OS X. No reason that should keep them from running Tux Paint!!! :^)

  164. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    typical right-wing lies. yawn.

    "the voters won," all right. and look what kind of world you cheating assholes "won" for your grandchildren. way to go republican liars! way to go bush, rumsfeld, cheney, rove, rice. the entire world is in debt to you. congratulations on rigging the election for what has turned out to be the most hated U.S. president in history. nixon's heirs must be relieved, at least.

  165. your a retard! by OneArmedMan · · Score: 1

    **I still don't like Windows XP verry well. It just doesn't feel right. Everything is so fucking hard to get done in that stupid practically-windows-only environment, with a command prompt that won't auto-complete! Why is it 2004 and DOS won't auto-complete?! Morons.**

    if you are unable to get Windows Xp command line to auto complete for you ( it basicly does it out of the box ) ... you are not as smart as you think that you are .

  166. Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "typical right-wing lies. yawn."

    'Tis all true. It is not a matter of right-wing opinion: it is the actual historic record.

    ""the voters won," all right"

    True. The actual vote counts stood.

    "congratulations on rigging the election"

    Winning by earning the popular vote in enough states to win the electoral college is not "rigging". If it is, then Clinton rigged the election: twice.

    "turned out to be the most hated U.S. president in history"

    No, his negatives have never gotten that low.

    1. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is the actual historic record.

      whose record? not mine. and being "the record" is not the same as being "the truth." i know, as all people who don't have their heads up their asses, that the election was rigged. gore received more votes than bush in florida. period. ever heard of katherine harris? she *illegally* accepted and certified the results of hand recounts that favored bush and rejected those (the majority) that favored gore. and that's not the worst of her crimes. she broke florida state law more than 20 times during the recounts. maybe you can tell me why even the supreme court ruled that bush got nearly 400 less votes than katherine harris said he did?

      the results of over 25 independent media-sponsored recounts taken since 2000 show that gore won florida by over 46,000 votes. the reason bush is in office today is not because he won - far from it - it's because gore decided to drop his legal case against bush. that was his decision. personally, looking at the state of the world today, i really wish he hadn't dropped it.

      True. The actual vote counts stood.

      yes. sickeningly, the actual *rigged* vote counts, stood.

      No, his negatives have never gotten that low.

      i'm not just talking about the USA. you could stand pretty much anywhere else in the world and swing a 1000-mile-long cat without ever hitting a single person who doesn't realize that bush is a lying, murdering subhuman and that the 2000 election was STOLEN for him by his brother Jeb and other corrupt republican officials in florida.

      if you'd stop relying on fox news for your information, you might learn a few more truths. jesus christ, do a little research. don't just repeat what bill o'reilly spoonfeeds you.

      sorry, pal, you're wrong.

    2. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "whose record? not mine. and being "the record" is not the same as being "the truth.""

      The truth being what actually happened in the election. Not what you wish happened, or some fringe kook website claimed happened.

      "that the election was rigged"

      That is one of the kook web lies.

      "gore received more votes than bush in florida. period"

      That would be fine. Except for the fact that the votes were counted 4 or 5 times and Gore lost each time

      "ever heard of katherine harris? she *illegally* accepted and certified the results of hand recounts that favored bush and rejected those (the majority) that favored gore"

      Except that Gore lost every time. Nothing to reject.

      "maybe you can tell me why even the supreme court ruled that bush got nearly 400 less votes than katherine harris said he did?"

      The margin by which Gore lost was very slim. Due to a margin of error, every time the votes were counted the numbers were different. However, Gore lost each time. It was clear that Gore was treating this like a dice game: he wanted to roll over and over (count over and over) until he won, and you can be sure he say "no more recounts!" at this point.

      "the results of over 25 independent media-sponsored recounts taken since 2000 show that gore won florida by over 46,000 votes"

      This is only, as said before, if you could ballots without Gore votes as being Gore ballots. When you count actual votes, Gore loses by a few hundred.

      "the reason bush is in office today is not because he won"

      Yes it is. He won. Get over it.

      "it's because gore decided to drop his legal case against bush. that was his decision. personally, looking at the state of the world today, i really wish he hadn't dropped it."

      Good thing he did. He lost the election. He would have been a far worse president. Even now, when Gore makes public appearances, he proposes very regressive policies and lies about current events.

      "if you'd stop relying on fox news for your information"

      Why? They are the most factual of the major news organization. They also dare to be balanced. The left-wing media establishment can't take this, and get so angry.

      "don't just repeat what bill o'reilly spoonfeeds you."

      And he is among the most factual and balanced. The far-left and far-right don't know what to make of O'Reilly: the rare angry moderate.

      "i'm not just talking about the USA. you could stand pretty much anywhere else in the world and swing a 1000-mile-long cat without ever hitting a single person who doesn't realize that bush is a lying, murdering subhuman and that the 2000 election"

      If they think this, then they are badly misinformed. Sore loser. You lost the election, fair and square. Get over it. Move on.

    3. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHHAHAH

      fox.... factual and balanced

      bill o'reilly... factual and balanced

      HAHHAHA

      ok, you're much, much stupider than i thought you were. it's no use trying to reason with you. just please go have a stroke somewhere and - for the sake of the future - don't attempt to procreate.

    4. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fox.... factual and balanced bill o'reilly... factual and balanced

      You've either never seen them, or you are so skewed that you think everything to the right of "The Nation" (inclusive) is right-wing.

      ok, you're much, much stupider than i thought you were. it's no use trying to reason with you

      Yes. I am "stupid" enough to measure political culture from the center. Unlike you "genius" you who measures as extreme anything that does not match his tinfoil-hat fringe view.

      and - for the sake of the future - don't attempt to procreate.

      Nah. We are informed, we vote, and we breed. We are the worst nightmare of political extremists.

    5. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok.. i don't know how i can make this any clearer to you... maybe if i put it in all caps.

      FOX NEWS IS NOT MODERATE. BILL O'REILLY IS NOT MODERATE.

      and yes, i have seen them.

      rupert murdoch? REPUBLICAN. BUSH SUPPORTER. surprise!

      if you think bush or murdoch or fox or o'reilly are moderate, that means that you are one of the following:

      - extremely uninformed
      - lying
      - even further right than they are, which means you're pretty deep into joseph mccarthy territory.

      there are no other possibilities.

      the republican party - fighting for the rights of bitter fat white men everywhere.

    6. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they think this, then they are badly misinformed.

      "i'm not crazy, the rest of the world is."

    7. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""i'm not crazy, the rest of the world is.""

      No, they aren't. Only you are crazy, with your impassioned defense of Saddam Hussein and your lies, along with your friends in the Taliban and Ba'ath Party.

      The world is more sane than you think. More than 50 nations joined coalition under the leadership of Bush and Blair to effectively retaliate against the terrorists (even more than in the first Gulf War).

    8. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first, that was 48 nations (now 47 since spain has regained its senses), liar, nearly all of which are increasingly wholly dependent on US foreign aid money and willing to sign anything to get it.

      oh, and which of those 47 have troops on the ground in iraq? *USA, UK, Australia*. They are the only nations with significant military presence in country. japan has a few troops, but wait a few days until those hostages are burned alive and the tape is shown on al-jazeera.

      oh, and this is rich... they've "effectively retaliated" against "the terrorists?" by doing what? invading a nation that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks? and if the retaliation was so effective, why is the US still there and why are they in a far worse position now than when they went in? and why is the nation on the brink of civil war - a civil war to determine which fundamentalist extremist group gets to take control of the country? and why is the price of oil actually increasing? and why can't 100,000 US troops seem to overpower a few thousand rebels and take control of Fallujah?

      oooh, the coalition has the support of micronesia! and the marshall islands! uzbekistan! that must mean the world is on our side! forget about the other *98 PERCENT OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION THAT REFUSED TO SUPPORT THE COALITION IN ANY WAY*. they don't mean anything. europe, asia, africa? they don't matter.

      don't try to argue a point you know nothing about, you undereducated blob of adipose tissue.

    9. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "first, that was 48 nations (now 47 since spain has regained its senses), "

      Spain lost its senses: the terrorists force them to abandon opposition to terror, and elect a much more oppressive government.

      "liar, nearly all of which are increasingly wholly dependent on US foreign aid money and willing to sign anything to get it."

      That is a lie, through and through. Each one of these countries has an economy that dwarfs the US aid given.

      "invading a nation that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks? "

      Correction: retaliating against a terrorist nation that had attacked US peacekeepers many times, and was in violation of the ceasefire... and refusing inspections. You are now sounding like Saddam with his lies.

      "japan has a few troops, but wait a few days until those hostages are burned alive and the tape is shown on al-jazeera"

      Only if Japan thinks "terrorism is OK" as Spain did.

      "and if the retaliation was so effective, why is the US still there" ....13 months later! Study WW2, etc to see how little time this is.

      "and why can't 100,000 US troops seem to overpower a few thousand rebels and take control of Fallujah?"

      How little you know of anything. They could if they wanted to, but it would mean leveling the place and massive casualties. Because they are being careful, it is much harder.

      "oooh, the coalition has the support of micronesia! and the marshall islands! uzbekistan! that must mean the world is on our side!"

      Some of the world is, yes. There are a lot of nasty dictators who oppose the coalition, too.

      *98 PERCENT OF THE WORLD'S POPULATION THAT REFUSED TO SUPPORT THE COALITION IN ANY WAY*.

      Not true. Even you acknowledge 47 countries. That adds up to about 1/4 of all countries, that outright joined the anti-terrorist coalition. 25% from 100% = at most 75%. not 98%. Also, remember, a lie in caps is still a lie.

      You seem so sad that Saddam was overthrown and democracy is coming to Iraq. Bob Kerrey, a Democrat, advocated this when Clinton was president. I bet if Clinton did it, you'd likely be lying to oppose Saddam and the terrorists instead of support them.

    10. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Study WW2, etc to see how little time this is.

      if you think that *world* war two was comparable to the US invasion of iraq in any way, you've got a muddy bowl of diarrhea for brains. actually, you do whether you think that or not.

      That adds up to about 1/4 of all countries

      ohhhh, so it's all of 1/4 of the world's nations that initially pledged resources (not troops) to the coalition. (i thought you said it was over 50? i guess that was a lie?) so the opinions of the overwhelming majority that didn't and don't support the coalition... they don't matter, right? the UN doesn't matter, right? "screw them, we want oil! and revenge for my daddy!"

      and where are the troops? if the coalition is so well-supported, where are the fighting men? "oh great! turkey lent us a bucket of green paint!"

      and by the way, since you can't read, i said the world's POPULATION. the population of the coalition nations is actually about 12% of the world population.

      it's great how you talk about spain's new "oppressive" government while ignoring your own jackboot brigade (ahem.. PATRIOT act.. racial profiling... etc.) typical thick-headed america-centrist reasoning. no wonder you are all dying of twinkie overdoses.

      democracy is coming to iraq? ridiculously wrong in two ways: 1) the us is being slowly pushed out of there to make room for the fundamentalists and 2) what kind of democracy is it where 12% of the vote outweighs 78%? i guess it's the good old bush style of democracy. just like when he stole florida.

      give it up, brainless.

    11. Re:Actual truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "if you think that *world* war two was comparable to the US invasion of ir"

      It is similar to WW2: at least: Saddam is/was a Hitler like figure, with his rampaging imperialism and dedication to extermination of the Jews.

      "ohhhh, so it's all of 1/4 of the world's nations..."

      That's 25%. You initially said it was 2%.

      "the UN doesn't matter, right?"

      No, it doesn't.

      "i guess it's the good old bush style of democracy. just like when he stole florida."

      What a crazy world you are in, where you steal a state by being more popular and getting more votes there.

  167. Family Computing using Linux by Chris+Tyler · · Score: 1

    From a note I sent to the author of the article:

    My two daughters (now 8 and 10) have also used Linux since they were tiny (3-4 years old).

    One change that I made to the normal system install was to modify the display manager (gdm/kdm) to enable multiple X sessions on different virtual terminals. We ran four different X servers -- one each on VT7 through VT10. Each of these VT's was assigned to a member of the family, so that we could each login and use the system even if another family member had not logged out.

    Thus, regardless of who was logged in, I could switch to my VT by pressing Ctrl-Alt-F7 and login there. If I got tied up with a phone call, my wife could then press Ctrl-Alt-F8 to switch to her VT and login there, without disturbing any applications which I had running. I could later switch back to my session on VT7 with Ctrl-Alt-F7. Likewise my two girls had VT9 and VT10.

    (This is set up with a relatively minor change in the Xservers file (for xdm/kdm) or gdm.conf file (for gdm)).

    I would have continued that practice, except that when I recently upgraded my home system, I added two additional keyboard/mouse/monitor setups. Thus we now have a single PC that supports three simultaneous users (using Backstreet Ruby; here is a description of the setup). For our family needs, this is easier to administer and uses less power than a 3-machine LAN while still providing plenty of performance.

  168. doh!..I thought it was normal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the deal here?
    I thought it was normal for a toddler to use it.
    My daughter uses RH8 since she was four and a half: She could start the computer, login, open the browser, check into those dollie.com sites and voila!
    hmm.. I should have made an article then and get some bucks...

  169. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "way to go bush, rumsfeld, cheney, rove, rice. the entire world is in debt to you. congratulations on [winning] the election for what has turned out to be the most hated U.S. president in history."

    Yes, way to go. Bush has led the charge and is dealing with the root causes of terrorism. He has ignored the lies of the pro-Saddam "anti-war" marchers and engaged in informed policiy decisions. He has earned the hatred of the terrorists, and it is not hard to understand why.

  170. The only way Babes are in this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is if Micheal Jackson is the only reader.

    "EeeeeHooooo.....come on little girl, everyone knows strangers have the best candy...."

  171. Kerry hated more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today's AP poll numbers: "Bush was backed by 45 percent of voters and Kerry by 44 percent"

    If Bush is "the most hated U.S. president in history", then Kerry, who is hated more, is bound to top this.

  172. Sorry, pal. you are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and that's not the worst of her crimes"

    OK. Tell me what crimes Kathleen Harris committed. Unless you are making stuff up and being slanderous, you'd better be able to back it up with criminal charge information and conviction information.

    (You won't find any, of course, because she committed no crime. The only accusations you get are from those who oppose her just because of her political party.)

    Let's check with Florida. If Jeb Bush really did "disenfranchise" them by making sure their votes were counted, they would hate him, right? Instead, when the re-election bid came up, the voters gave Jeb a landslide victory.

    1. Re:Sorry, pal. you are wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm not going to do your research for you, you slobbering republican fucker.

      read something besides fhm or sports illustrated for once. you might even try a web search. "katherine harris crimes" is a good start. hey, even a search for "katherine harris" will turn up several nice listings of all the florida statutes she's violated. not because of her political party, because she *repeatedly undertook actions that were in violation of florida law.*

      and guess what: one doesn't have to be charged with or convicted of anything to have broken the law. ever gotten away with speeding?

      moron.

  173. Re:Bill Maher = historically incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Every time votes were counted, Bush won."

    You are soooo wrong! Look at all the media recounts that were done after 2000. Bush lost according to almost every one of them.

    What a jerk!

  174. Did you even do your searches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you might even try a web search. "katherine harris crimes" "

    I did that on Google. Came up with 0 hits.

    Then, I searched on "kathleen harris" crimes. Came up with more hits. The first two were not even relevant (about her), The third was by a Democrat Party commentator. The rest of the links in the first page are mostly not relevant (wrong Kathleen, or wrong "crimes"). But there is another one with false accusations from Marxists. All told, 188 hits, of which many have nothing to do with the subject you mentioned.

    In contrast, a search on "bill clinton" crimes comes up with 147,000 hits.

    Not terribly relevant, but it does coincide a little with the fact that Clinton was charged with a crime or two and convicted of one. Kathleen Harris, in contrast, was never seriously accused, charged, or convicted. In other words, Clinton committed a crime and Harris committed none.

    "and guess what: one doesn't have to be charged with or convicted of anything to have broken the law."

    Using your logic, that having blog bloviators accuse you of crimes means you are guilty, I guess, yes, she is guilty (and Clinton is 720 times as guilty).

    "Al Gore" crimes comes up with 72,000 hits compared to Harris' 1800. Using your standards, this means that Gore is a much worse criminal than Harris.

    1. Re:Did you even do your searches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      congratulations, captain literal! i was suggesting methods of research, not trying to supply you with actual search strings. way to be ignorant.

      harris was CONVICTED of no crimes YET. OJ wasn't convicted either, but there sure as hell are a lot of people that think he's guilty too.

      Using your logic, that having blog bloviators accuse you of crimes means you are guilty

      uh, that's not my logic. unless you consider the new york times, the economist, the washington post, the bbc, the boston herald, and all the other international media that have reported on katherine harris' twisting of the election results to be "blog bloviators" (that is the stupidest fucking term i have ever heard, by the way.) in which case, god help you. oh wait, let me guess, those are all left-wing controlled media, right? uh huh.

    2. Re:Did you even do your searches? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "congratulations, captain literal"

      Call me Captain Informed.

      "harris was CONVICTED of no crimes YET"

      She is not even charged. There are no serious accusations beyond those of those who would imprison her for not belonging to the Democratic Party first.

      "uh, that's not my logic."

      Yes it is. You were equating partisan web rants to actual guilt.

      "unless you consider the new york times, the economist, the washington post, the bbc, the boston herald, and all the other international media that have reported on katherine harris' twisting of the election results to be "blog bloviators"

      Since she did not do any of this, they did not report what you claim.

      " those are all left-wing controlled media, right? uh huh."

      The BBC was caught in a scandal of pandering to the left by making up stuff. I don' trust the BBC anyway, regardless of "wing" it is the official government news organ of the United Kingdom, and I do not trust government to control the media.

      The Economist is not left-wing. The NYT is the standard bearer for the left-wing print press in America. The Post is left-wing as well. I am not familiar with the Herald. The international media? that can be taken on a case-by-case basis.

  175. Media recounts = the loser lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are soooo wrong! Look at all the media recounts that were done after 2000

    The first ones I found showed Gore losing.

    Read this cnn account of two major newspaper "media counts". Neither paper is considered to be conservative. Gore loses in every single count of votes.

  176. You are nothing but a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "FOX NEWS IS NOT MODERATE. BILL O'REILLY IS NOT MODERATE."

    Lies in all caps are still lies. Both of these represent the center of American politics, lying between the right (Bush, Limbaugh, etc) and the left (Kerry, Franken, etc). Fox News presents both sides in balance, and O'Reilly is the rare "angry moderate" who bashes Bush, Dean, Cheney, and Hillary equally.

    CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC are left-wing. While the right-wing dominates AM radio, there is no right-wing TV news network.

    "if you think bush or murdoch or fox or o'reilly are moderate, that means that you are one of the following"

    Incorrect again. My correct statement means I know what I am talking about, and have wide experience in media analysis.

    Here's a question for you: Which media magnate gave Michael Moore his own show on a prime time major network slot for 2 years? Answer: Murdoch. (If he were a right-wing kook, would he do that?)

    "the republican party - fighting for the rights of bitter fat white men everywhere."

    Now you are showing that you are nothing but a racist. Ted Kennedy, perhaps the most famous bitter fat white man in the country, is not even a republican. It only shows that racists like you have no idea what they are talking about.

    1. Re:You are nothing but a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are so full of shit. rupert murdoch is one of the most widely reviled media magnates in the world largely because of his right-wing politics. he calls himself a neocon, you fool. is he wrong about himself too?

      i don't hate white men, i hate republicans. who makes up nearly all of the republican party and voter base? black women?

      why don't you use your "wide experience in media analysis" (that's a fucking riot) to look up rupert murdoch's media holdings and his political connections. hint: you won't find much evidence of the left in there.

    2. Re:You are nothing but a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you are so full of shit. rupert murdoch is one of the most widely reviled media magnates in the world"

      Reviled? Not really. His stations and newspapers/etc are really quite popular.

      "....because of his right-wing politics"

      He is not that extreme, what it amounts to is only the left-wingers hate him.

      " don't hate white men"

      Yet you make racist statements.

      "i hate republicans"

      That is quite true. That is why you vent tinfoil hat conspiracy theories about your political opponents.

      "who makes up nearly all of the republican party and voter base? black women?"

      The base is made of men, women, of all races. The same is true of just about all the political parties.

      " to look up rupert murdoch's media holdings "

      So? It says nothing except that he has a lot of popular stations/etc.

      "you won't find much evidence of the left in there."

      Only if you ignore reality, such as the anti-bush books published by the publishing company he owns.

    3. Re:You are nothing but a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reviled? Not really. His stations and newspapers/etc are really quite popular."

      which has absolutely nothing to do with whether *he* is reviled. which he most certainly is.

      "He is not that extreme, what it amounts to is only the left-wingers hate him."

      but... you said earlier that he wasn't right-wing. so... why would only left-wingers hate him? something doesn't really make sense there.

      and he has repeatedly been taken to task for trying to mold the content and programming of his (purportedly independent) media holdings to fit his personal politics. apparently you don't read much.

      "The base is made of men, women, of all races. The same is true of just about all the political parties."

      uh.... yeah. except that 94% of republican voters are white, and 60% are male. if i'd just kindly over look that little statistic, your statement would be true, right? republicans really represent a wide spectrum of humanity. a virtual rainbow. if rainbows were all white, i mean.

      you're deluded. you belong to an old boys' club. the party of pat buchanan, david duke, and worst of all, shrub.

      i can't fucking wait for november. you slimeballs won't be able to steal this one.

    4. Re:You are nothing but a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and he has repeatedly been taken to task for trying to mold the content and programming of his (purportedly independent) media holdings to fit his personal politics. apparently you don't read much."

      "Taken to task" for freedom of speech? Any publisher/media owner has the right to control their own content. This should not be anyone's business.

      I read plenty. The left-wing activists, in fact, mounted an effort to pressure the FCC to censor Murdoch's stations because they did not like his politics.

      "you're deluded. you belong to an old boys' club. the party of pat buchanan, david duke, and worst of all, shrub."

      It rejected Buchanan (you know so little about him that you forgot that he is a Reform Party member now, and has been for years) badly undermined Duke to the point of supporting Democrats against him.

      "Shrub"? No such man exists any more than "Slick Willie" exists.

      As for "old boy's club", Ted Kennedy and Robert Byrd are old boys. The overwhelming majority of Democratic senators and reps are white males. Using your logic, this means that the Democrat party is racist.

  177. Department by Spunk · · Score: 1

    I think you mean from the apt-beget department.

  178. It's the quantity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once Linux becomes as big as Windows is, the popularity will entice all the wormsmiths to move from Windows over to Linux, and you'll have the same problem all over again.

  179. Insightful? Try ignorant. by fm6 · · Score: 1
    Good lord, you've tried 3 different distros, but you didn't take the time to try out different desktops? It's not Linux itself that soaks up the cycles -- I've run Linux on 486-33 boxes! But KDE and Gnome have a lot of high end graphics that take a lot of horsepower. A good graphic card doesn't hurt either. These desktops are trying to emulate Windows and/or MacOS, so of course they suck up the resources.

    Of course most distros uses KDE or Gnome by default. But it's not that hard to configure a different desktop. Mandrake even lets you choose a different one every time you log in.