Slashdot Mirror


NTT DoCoMo's 4G Tests Hit 300Mbps

haunebu writes "'Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone is nearing obsolesence: NTT DoCoMo reveals the results from a new 4G test system.' says TheFeature. While in a car moving at 30kph, DoCoMo engineers managed a peak throughput of 300Mbps and a sustained transfer rate of 135Mbps with their new variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology. Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

259 comments

  1. Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Matey-O · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone is nearing obsolesence:'

    Not in America it ain't.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      sure it is... just like every other phone you can buy here :(

    2. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by swordboy · · Score: 1

      Not in America it ain't.

      Phone, agreed.

      Broadband... well... more like cable and DSL just became obsolete. I, for one, welcome our new broadband overlords. I can't wait for the day that I can call Comcrap and let them really know how I feel about their pathetically poor service.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    3. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once I get a few things out of the way (a wedding, for one), I'm going to work with my township to provide fiber-to-the-home service. The electrical and sewer systems need replaced, so this is a perfect time to future-proof our infrastructure while providing incentives for businesses to move here and services for people. Then I can tell Comcast to suck it, like I've been wanting to do for a long, long time.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    4. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by namespan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously. Has anyone seen an actual 3G network yet? GSM/GPRS speeds are still like dialup, but with a latency that makes you yearn for your dialup connection. CDMA stuff (like PCS Vision) is faster and has acceptable latency, but still, 100K or so really isn't great. I've heard the term 2.5G thrown around, but wireless internet is still no great shakes as far as I can see.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    5. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by fshalor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering some new cars have a bluetooth integration with the car audio system and cell phones. You sit in yo car, drive arround, say "call billy bob" and the thing rings, through the cell phone in your pocket.

      Now I can bring my laptop, set it in the back seat, and say, "email billy bob file Process-Flow-Diagram-02.pdf " and it will work.

      Cool.

      But aren't we suppsoed to be driving the car. At least for a few more years? :)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    6. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now were starting to see 3G here in Spain...at last!


      Too much services...but the phone costs ~500 euros

    7. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by aldoman · · Score: 1

      In the UK, most (60-70%) of the population is now covered by a 3G network. You see, high population densities DO have their good things!

      But seriously, see www.three.co.uk for coverage maps...

    8. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Troed · · Score: 1

      *looking down at the Sony Ericsson Z1010 with 3G connection beside him*

      Umm .. yeah. I'm in Sweden though.

    9. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, since the phones works with both 3G and GSM/GPRS, the only thing you notice is that you can't watch streamed video in the forest. I suspect that you live in the US, because in some civilized parts of the world most of the populated areas (yes, including villages with 1000 people) have full 3G coverage.

      Five years ago, writing this on a bus would be a cool thing. But now it isn't anymore, so I need to find something bandwidth consuming to do while I travel...

    10. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I get 384k 3G speeds on my laptop with no trouble in the UK.

      Bandwidth limits suck though... 50MB before it gets really pricey.

    11. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by DJStealth · · Score: 1

      A paper I wrote about 1.5 years ago, entitled, "Evolution towards 3G Technologies and Beyond" may be of interest to some of you.

    12. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so? we've got z1010's in sweden... besides we also have three operators up and almost 80% of our population covered... I'd say we've had a good start!

    13. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by nexex · · Score: 1
      heh, good luck

      electric lightwave wanted to wire the small city i live in about 5 years ago with fiber (for free). the city councils response:

      No thanks, we already have cable tv.

      I shit you not

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    14. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably the overlords joke that made the moderators skip you in this thread...

    15. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by ylon · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Can you provide some more information? First, how much would a project like this cost? Can you do such a thing on a shoestring budget? I couldn't believe it would be cost effective from what I've seen in terms of fiber costs and labor costs (even doing it yourself). Second, what type of argument or sales pitch has worked? Has anyone seen this work? How can you spearhead this into a feasible project with local government? Interesting thoughts and ramifications, please elaborate. I've heard mention of this before but have seen no "beef." Is there a group or consortium to help consolidate information and push this along? I sadly think our only hope though is the unused TV frequencies as we live in a very hilly and wooded area.

    16. Re:Your brand-spankin'-new 3G phone by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      I really haven't had time to do a lot of research, but several communities have done this. One small town in rural PA (~5,000 people) was able to install this and provide lots of incentive for business to move in when Comcast and Verizon had written them off. Incentive in the form of 10Mb broadband with a static IP for $15/month. If a town that small can do it, I'm pretty sure my relatively affluent and densely populated suburb could afford it, and that there's demand

      What I do know is that there are sewer modules that also are made to house fiber optic networks. Since the sewers need replaced, it's a perfect time to wire the township for fiber.

      If you want more information, the place to go is the Fiber-to-the-Home Council. Case studies and research material galore.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  2. Eat that DSL and Cable by binaryspiral · · Score: 0, Redundant

    mobile ethernet would give my ISP a run for its money... I just got 1Mb!

    1. Re:Eat that DSL and Cable by tux_deamon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, 135 Mbps would prove great for full motion streaming video, but how good will all that porn look on a 1" LCD?

    2. Re:Eat that DSL and Cable by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      the cell phone is just the CPE... it'll be streaming it to the HDTV mounted on the wall!

    3. Re:Eat that DSL and Cable by fermion · · Score: 1

      about as good as the 15 second loops looked in the original real player. I think the window was about the same resolution as the phones I have seen.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  3. Just what I need... by the_rajah · · Score: 5, Funny

    A cell phone that's equivalent to 87.66234 T-1 lines..

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And probably even more expensive, if US carriers keep up their data billing practices.

    2. Re:Just what I need... by SnoBall · · Score: 1

      All we need now is a version of Doom that will run on cellphones, then we can have a BLUETOOTH PARTY! Frags a plenty, without all the wires. ^_^

      --
      Don't eat me ... *looks at nickname* ... okay, eat me.
    3. Re:Just what I need... by sockonafish · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      A cell phone that's equivalent to 87.66234 T-1 lines..

      I wonder what it's like to have 87.6623 T1 lines running through your HEAD!

    4. Re:Just what I need... by fintler · · Score: 1

      um, take a look at MDoom (search on google). It's a clone of doom for your celly telly.

    5. Re:Just what I need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many other nodes were also broadcasting to simulate noise? It is not that difficult to make an SiGe or InP circuit that can achieve those speeds. It would only cost over $2000 and drain your battery in 60 seconds.

  4. roll out date? by Burlap · · Score: 1

    I just wonder when they will be coming out.

  5. their secret is... by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...that it's a very small island, just put big transmitters on mountantops and you're good to go

    1. Re:their secret is... by mrm677 · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...that it's a very small island, just put big transmitters on mountantops and you're good to go

      Actually this is not funny. The United States is, for the most part, sparsely populated compared to most of Europe and Asia. This is why the U.S. carriers hesitated to adopt GSM in the early 90s, which has a fixed number of supported users/frequency and has a maximum cell size due to being time multiplexed. On the other hand, CDMA is able to create much larger cells at the expense of a higher noise floor (hence less users). It was promised to be better suited to sparsely populated areas, yet still tuneable to suit New York City and etc. Whether or not CDMA IS-95 met those goals is debateable.

      Japan is indeed under less contraints. Their cell sizes are very small meaning the required transmission power is reduced. If anybody ever saw a Japanese PDC phone from 10 years ago, and was blown away at how small it was, this is the explanation.

    2. Re:their secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but when a giant lizard (who shall remain nameless) tears down those transmitters every couple of years and they have to be put back up, thats when you see how resourceful the Japanese truely are.

    3. Re:their secret is... by nosphalot · · Score: 1
      Do you even have a clue how cell works?

      Big transmitters mean big cells, and big cells defeat the whole point of a cellular network, esp in dense populations like Japan.

    4. Re:their secret is... by brianjcain · · Score: 4, Informative

      Motorola's GSM base stations offer extended range cells (120km radius) which do implement the coverage density/cell size tradeoff you describe. I'd imagine it might be easier for CDMA to offer a larger set of grades than these do, though.

    5. Re:their secret is... by kabocox · · Score: 1


      Japan is indeed under less contraints. Their cell sizes are very small meaning the required transmission power is reduced. If anybody ever saw a Japanese PDC phone from 10 years ago, and was blown away at how small it was, this is the explanation.


      O.k. all we need to do in this country is figure out how to intergate the base stations into regular lightbulbs and street lights for no extra cost. Then we could all have a unlimited wireless bandwidth anywhere.

    6. Re:their secret is... by swb · · Score: 1

      O.k. all we need to do in this country is figure out how to intergate the base stations into regular lightbulbs and street lights for no extra cost. Then we could all have a unlimited wireless bandwidth anywhere.

      Almost a sane idea, except I'm thinking of traffic lights, not street lights -- they either have or need signalling capability to the control center, and they're everywhere. All you need to do is make metropolitan wireless broadband and re-doing traffic lights a high priority.

    7. Re:their secret is... by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Yeah -
      The bottom line is they have a workforce which is simultaneously very productive - and happy to live in cellblocks no larger than american jails

      They are monocultural - which means they do not experience (minority based solutions) they exhibit low rate of population growth,

      And which the (minor by comparison) exception of pearl harbor they do not carry a history of sensless genecide.

      AIK

    8. Re:their secret is... by minairia · · Score: 2, Interesting
      This still doesn't answer why the US is so backwards in mobile. There's no reason why we couldn't have Japanese style mobile networks in the US in dense areas like Florida, New York or Chicago and just expand them out to the less populated areas as time goes on. (Even in Japan, in the far outlying areas, there are places without coverage).

      Basically, US mobile companies and slow, lazy, inefficient and technologically backwards. They don't want to invest in new technology because they don't have to because they jointly control the market as a monopoly and the cost of entering fresh with new technology is way way too high.

      In Japan now, you can have cell phones with four way video conferencing, TV, GPS and a function where you use the phone as an electronic wallet at the store or with vending machines.

      Other than finding new ways to explode things in ever more violent ways, the US is slipping behind the curve. I'm no liberal and have nothing against blasting terrorists, etc. but we're going to have to concentrate on other things as well to keep ahead.

    9. Re:their secret is... by kryonD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, we are waging a cultural battle that we are never going to win. Most of my friends in Tokyo who are in their 20's and still not married still live with their parents. And they average about 60K in income. Stop and think for a second how many toys you could buy for that kind of cash at the expense of still living with your parents. No place to make out with your girlfriend (I know this is slashdot, but work with me on this...), no problem, just go to a love hotel with the waterfall themed room and only pay $30 for 3 hours of sweet loving. Yes, eventually you'll get married and get a place of your own and be back in the poor house, but by then your tired of having the bleeding edge in fashion and tech and are just happy with something that works. No hurt to the economy as there is a generation of youngsters rolling almost their entire bank into having cell phones that double as credit cards/train tickets/PDAs/TVs/Digital Cameras/Radio telescopes. Just imagine if every young american was buying a new cell phone on an average of every 6 to 12 months....the companies would be forced to innovate to give us something better than we bought 6 months ago or lose us to a competitor who say, already is developing wotking 4G technology.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    10. Re:their secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      And which the (minor by comparison) exception of pearl harbor they do not carry a history of sensless genecide.
      You have got to be kidding. Americans are so fucking ignorant about world history it makes me weep.
    11. Re:their secret is... by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 3, Informative

      yeah - AC has a point (perhaps 2) here.

      The Japanese were fairly brutal during the war.

      They killed maybe more than hilter and Stalin - mostly east asians, chinese and Koreans

      Nasty.

      My Bad

    12. Re:their secret is... by jrumney · · Score: 0, Troll

      I love you Americans. Pearl Harbor was "senseless genocide", invading Iraq was neccesary to protect America from all those WMDs Saddam was supplying to Al Qaeda, inmates of Guantanemo Bay are entitled to the protections of neither the Geneva Convention, nor the US Constitution.... and you wonder "why do all the nasty foreigners hate us so much?"

    13. Re:their secret is... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Actually, their secret is investment in emerging technology. Throw billions of dollars at a problem, and it usually goes away.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    14. Re:their secret is... by AmericanInKiev · · Score: 1

      Pearl Harbour was mostly unprovoked - or unjustified by any measure.

      The inmates at Guantanemo Bay are ntitled to whatever protections actually apply.

      The Geneva conventions apply to soldiers in uniform - if they were -then they are.

      The Constitution applies in various ways.

      For example: State actors were not required to recognize the civil rights of persons (usually blacks and women) until the 14 ammendment (circa 1900)

      The argument that foriegn nationals on foriegn soil are somehow protected by the Constitution is interesting - doubtful that it will be found so.

      Perhaps the US has a treaty - internation, cuba, Iraq, french even that specifies the limitations of US power on foriegn soils within the context of war.

      Here's the problem: What you have amounts to US Police powers in foriegn countries - and what "Bill of Rights" extends to non-uniformed "persons of interest"

      I think the Geneva writers left that out.

      As the occupying force - we are required to provide basic needs and to some extent security - which means police authority.

      But it doesn't mean caviar - and it doesn't mean the right to a professionally defended jury trial.

      Whatever process exists - will be the creation of the occupying force of which George - I can barely ride a bike - Bush is the President.

      That is the cost of liberals buying votes with welfare.

      They need to get a grip - and start contributing to international problems rather than shilling dependancies like drugs.

      AIK

    15. Re:their secret is... by nexex · · Score: 1
      i was about to say, have you never heard of the rape of nanking or unit 731 -- makes mengele look like a humanitarian

      sickening stuff, only a handful of japanese were ever tried and japan has never apologized to china (to my knowledge)

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    16. Re:their secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I see the "sparse population" argument over and over again, and it falls on its face EVERY SINGLE TIME.

      Finland has about half the population density of USA. Yet we've had 100% GSM coverage for over five years now. Don't give me the crap about extreme rural areas; we have thousands of square miles of wilderness in Lapland and perfect coverage there too.

      It's just unwillingness and general animosity towards cell phones in the USA that's hindering things.

    17. Re:their secret is... by jonbrewer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most of my friends in Tokyo who are in their 20's and still not married still live with their parents

      For God's Sake! Would somebody please think of the parents!

    18. Re:their secret is... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Of course, Sweden and Finland are, alongside Japan, among the most unwired countries in the world - and thay manage to handle the expense of overing not only the densely populated urban centers and southern areas, but most of the (very sparse) countryside as well.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    19. Re:their secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of Australia? GSM, pop'n 20mil.

    20. Re:their secret is... by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      This comment applies to Taiwan as well, although they're a bit more conservative here than the Japanese. BTW, Taiwan has the greatest cell phone use per capita than any other country in the world. And, yes, it does have to do with a small area to implement the network in.

    21. Re:their secret is... by mrm677 · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of Australia? GSM, pop'n 20mil.

      Yes. In the early 1990s, revenue for cellular service was a fraction of what it is today. Nowadays, financing GSM in sparsely populated areas is feasible. While the U.S. was pondering the switch to GSM, the situation was different.

      And the data rate for GSM is not 300MBs.

    22. Re:their secret is... by dammitallgoodnamesgo · · Score: 1
      Actually, we are waging a cultural battle that we are never going to win. Most of my friends in Tokyo who are in their 20's and still not married still live with their parents. And they average about 60K in income.
      Who do they work for? I'd love to double my salary, and I'm sure all the other 20-something Engineers I know in Tokyo/Yokohama would agree.
    23. Re:their secret is... by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      Family size is usually about 1 child, and people marry late. Now combine that with the humongous population density, and lack of need to buy a "house" due to lack of available land.

      Now that you're not pissing money away to raise all your kids as either single, or married parents, in a large household, or saving up for that down, you too will tend to have a lot of disposable income to pay for the next fashionable trinket that comes onto the market.

    24. Re:their secret is... by kryonD · · Score: 1

      4tech as a network engineer, NTT Docomo as a consultant, JapanLaw as a translator, half a dozen GS-6 through GS-9's who work on the US bases, and I even know one guy banking 120K rewriting bank software from Cobol and Fortran to C++ and JAVA web front ends. Salary has very little to do with what you know, and almost everything to do with who you know and what you can get done for them. Promotion is not simply a matter of being good enough to replace your boss, it is almost always more tied to being more accepted by your bosses peers as a replacement....i.e. if you aren't out networking and getting to know people, they're never going to think of you when the higher paying jobs pop up on the radar. It may also be noted that some of my friends average 16 to 18 hour days and get some of their most valuable sleep on the Yokohama line.

      --
      I've dirtied my hands writing poetry, for the sake of seduction; that is, for the sake of a useful cause. --Dostoevsky
    25. Re:their secret is... by dammitallgoodnamesgo · · Score: 1
      4tech as a network engineer, NTT Docomo as a consultant, JapanLaw as a translator, half a dozen GS-6 through GS-9's who work on the US bases, and I even know one guy banking 120K rewriting bank software from Cobol and Fortran to C++ and JAVA web front ends.
      There seems to be a certain amount of "being an American" going on there (which won't help me, or my friends.) And, of course, if you're working in Japan, promotion (and wages) is tied to your age. I don't know about DoCoMo, but the NTT Soft engineers we work with get a comparable wage to us.
    26. Re:their secret is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah - aldof hilter that australian plumber who caused so much grief....

      forgot about him

    27. Re:their secret is... by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      Hitler was Australian? Wow, and this whole time I thought he was Austrian! Silly me!

  6. The obvious explanation... by kpansky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    The obvious explanation for both of these seemingly puzzling questions is of course Pocky.

    --

    --Kevin
    1. Re:The obvious explanation... by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

      Pocky is the bomb. Especially strawberry.

  7. WSF-OFCDM? by FreeHeel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't speak Japanese, but shouldn't the acronym for ariable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing be VSF-OFCDM?

    1. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the Japanese do not have a sound for V in their language, and is therefore replaced by a W.

    2. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      valiable spleading factol olthogonal flequency...

    3. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The engineer was Scottish... it is a phonetic acronym.

    4. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by BalDown · · Score: 1

      I would have to say it's the same reason one of my professors couldn't say Java in a Java programming class. He couldn't say the letter v. It always came out as Jawa. We had to hold off on the laughter so much... Of course, the best part was the kid who sat behind me in class having the name Travis...

      Boy how many times did I have to hold in laughter when I heard "Trawis... how you do this in Jawa?"

      --
      You wasted packets to get this lousy sig.
    5. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

      Actually... those words aren't Japanese at all. They are English. The Japanese language does not support Acronyms at all. And very little computer terminology is actually named in Japanese. Instead what you find is that the technology is named as English and then referred to as the English words.

      Examples: Computer==konpyuta, website==webusaito, file==fairu, email==emeeru

      Pronunciation is of course wrong as I don't know romaji at all

    6. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by forrestt · · Score: 1

      I assume you are referencing the Star Trek Movie in which they are looking for, "Nuclear Wessels" . . .

      That was Chekov, and he is in fact Russian (At least in the show. I have no idea what nationality the actor was/is (And no this is not an invitation for those of you who have nothing better to do than dress up as Worf and parade around the mall to "inform" me of all the in's and out's of Star Trek.

    7. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the actor was also named Chekov, yes, Chekov was in fact Russian.

    8. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're Japanese words, though it might not like it to people who haven't studied Japanese history. Basically the Japanese language takes foreign words and integratates them lock stock and barrel into their own system. This has been going on forever. Tons of perfectly ordinary words for things like pots, pans and pants are taken directly from old european languages. "Pan" is dutch for bread for example, yet you wouldn't say it's not a Japanese word. Koohii is Japanese for coffe: people bitch that it's engrish and they should just say coffee, those people don't understand that it's not meant to be English but Japanese. Same for the computer terms, they've assimilated the words and now they're Japanese words. On some level the Japanese people might recognize that the words are foreign in origin, but with time this too is forgotten.

      Basically they're the exact opposite of the French who like to invent their own words for everything new.

    9. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to be outdone, China announces its developing the competing WTF-OMGLOL!!1!one1!KTHXBYE network technology.

    10. Re:WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume he was referring to Scotty, you know the SCOTTISH ENGINEER. br>
      Fuck, what is it with you cunts.....

  8. Total area to cover by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    Simple, smaller area to provide coverage = lower cost. That's why in places like South Korea you can get a LOT of bandwith a whole lot cheaper than here (U.S.).

    1. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in canada and broadband is cheaper here.

    2. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your population is also far more concentrated than the U.S.'s.

    3. Re:Total area to cover by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      So how come we don't see similar bandwidth numbers in large American cities like New York or LA? They're very dense and have a miniscule physical area compared to the rest of the country, a market of 7 million+ potential subscribers, and yet until quite recently you couldn't even get cable internet in NYC!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well since so many seem to think area is the single most dominant factor;

      There are countries which are less populated than the US and still have a much faster deployment of cell phone technologies.
      (e.g. Nordic region)

      Culture might also have something to say.

      That said;
      Even in the "home of nokia/Ericsson" nordic region we envy them their more advanced phones and networks.

    5. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only it were that simple. the Japanese have been ahead technologically (in this sector) for years --- not just in terms of adoption. If it were a simple matter of adoption, we enough high-density areas to make the infrastructure costs similar in those areas, so we should see modern wireless in cities, nothing or old tech in low-density areas.

      instead, the whole continent is years behind south east asia (and parts of europe).

    6. Re:Total area to cover by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure smaller area translates to cheaper access. In Canada you pay 44.95/month for 5mbps/800kbps cable connection, which afaik is much cheaper then the US and we're about 100 times the size of S. Korea.
      Our Cell phone rates however, are significatly higher then the US and I'm sure else where in the world.

    7. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's the rest of the United States providers have to spend money on, not just the densely populated cities you've picked.

    8. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so, what's the broadband access like in the Yukon and Northwest Territories?

    9. Re:Total area to cover by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      That's a little cheaper (since the Canadian dollar is a little less) but not much different. Here it's $40USD/month and offers speeds of at least 5mbps down (not sure what the actual cap is). Of course, like all cable, it's consumer level and contingent on how loaded your segment is. Consumer level broadband is getting pretty cheap, it's the pro stuff that tends to be expensive.

    10. Re:Total area to cover by icejai · · Score: 1

      Er, don't forget the very important fact that South Korea deregulated their broadband internet market several years ago. This lead to an explosion of competition between internet providers. The insane bandwidth for equally insanely low costs are the direct results of this competition from deregulation.

      It's kind've like the boom in long distance providers (321-10-10 numbers and countless long d cards) in north america once *that* was deregulated.

    11. Re:Total area to cover by kpansky · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up insightful.

      --

      --Kevin
    12. Re:Total area to cover by aldoman · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean in cities, because canada's population density across the country must be the lowest in the developed world (maybe excluding russia).

      In that case, there is no reason why US broadband providers should nto be able to compete at such prices, as US cities are very, very similar to Canadian cities when it comes to pop. density.

    13. Re:Total area to cover by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      Simple, smaller area to provide coverage = lower cost. That's why in places like South Korea you can get a LOT of bandwith a whole lot cheaper than here (U.S.).

      It's not that simple. The urban Japanese worker probably spends at least an hour in a train every day, while the urban American might be driving. The urban Japanese living space is much smaller (yes, even compared to a US metropolis), so bulky PCs are not as desirable. Housing costs are also sky-high, which means many people no longer hope to own a home, and therefore would have more disposable income to spend on gadgets.

    14. Re:Total area to cover by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      Total area is only part of it. No need ( or desire ) to be compatible with any standard outside of Japan helps a lot. The U.K. could do similar things, but as people move often between the U.K. and Europe, a scheme like that would likely fail in lieu of one that would work seamlessly between areas.

      This same reasoning also applied to things like car navigation systems. Mapping all of Japan was of course easier than all of the US. Someone could have come up with a system that only worked in California, but as drivers too frequently go out of CA, it wouldn't fare well. Not to many people driving out of Japan. The US isn't even close to the car navigation penetration that Japan had 15 years ago.

      Hawaii might be comparable to Japan, but like England and Europe, too many people going back and forth that expect to have their wireless devices work seamlessly.

      So geography plays a big part of Japan's ease in integrating new wireless technology, but it's that combined with their culture that makes it work.

    15. Re:Total area to cover by earlytime · · Score: 1

      Call it leapfrogging,

      There are plenty of places where they've never had the legacy of fully deployed infrastructure like in makor US cities. So in those places, then can go with whatever technology is appropriate, regardless of past investements/oblications in communications tech. As I understand, the phillipines is a great example. They did not have a full buildout of power/comm lines when wireless/cellular came out, so they were able to build out much cheaper and faster using wireless tech. Especially in the rural areas, telecomm services only became pervasive with the advent of wireless telecomm. I'm sure the numbers for dsl and cable also reflect this wireless infrastructure.

      --

    16. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, so, what's the broadband access like in the Yukon and Northwest Territories?"

      The same as it is in Toronto. Phone and cable co monopolies are not allowed to discriminate and the rest of us subsidize their cell and internet use.

    17. Re:Total area to cover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can their bandwidth be faster than my hard disk writes?

    18. Re:Total area to cover by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1
      canada's population density across the country must be the lowest in the developed world (maybe excluding russia).
      That title belongs to Mongolia. Canada is the 9th lowest. Australia (3rd lowest) is the lowest developed country.
  9. Concentration by jm92956n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Might it be partially due to the higher concentration of people? Because the Japanese people live in closer proximity to one another, fewer cell-towers are needed to provide coverage for a comparable amount of people. Therefore, each cell tower can he of higher quality.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
  10. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    Population Density.

  11. WiFi Anyone?? by dukeluke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After reading this article - it has led me to analyze the benefits of this versus traditional 802.11x and the application of 4G in the broadband arena.

    At a proposed sustained rate of 1G, this technology could revolutionize the Internet as we know it today. And, with more and more bandwidth readily available, there will be better multiplayer games online, as well as streaming on-demand cable-like tv off the Net.

    I understand that the technology is proposed for gadgets such as a phone or wristwatch that can also watch HDTV - but imagine a world where everyone has a video-phone conference & everyone also has a 1G up/down broadband connection :)

    In a word - WOW.

    1. Re:WiFi Anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. Sure, you get 1G to the base stations. For this to have any use as a broadband connection to the internet at large though, those base stations are either going to have to number in the millions or, somewhere, have a massive link to the internet as the number of users increases. I don't see any major cities in the US allowing base stations every 20 feet, and I don't see anybody paying for the kind of base station connections that can sustain hundreds if not thousands of users at anywhere near 1G being realized either.

      Replacing all of the wires with this isn't going to fly either - do you want to be the person that gets to rig the chain of transmitters up through the rockies and then maintain them? And how do you plan to cross the oceans?

      This technology is really cool, but it's not going to be useful for creating anything except pockets of high speed until the good old fashioned internet connections get cheap enough to keep up.

    2. Re:WiFi Anyone?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like a world that the RIAA and MPAA and other protectionist groups would make sure never see's our shores, not without watching every byte that comes across to make sure it doesn't infringe.

      and to answer why the japanese have done so well in wireless, haven't they done so since the transistor radio?

    3. Re:WiFi Anyone?? by Tatarize · · Score: 1

      Nobody said replace all the wires. All the problems with internet distribution at least in the states is what the call the last mile. Getting it from where you ran the fiber to the house is a pain. Cable, Dialup, DSL, ISDN, T1 ect, these all go to a place with fiber that goes out to the rest of the net. If you could replace this last mile with a good wireless connection the prices would drop dramaticly.

      --

      It is no longer uncommon to be uncommon.
    4. Re:WiFi Anyone?? by aldoman · · Score: 1

      In the oceans and in the rockies you simply use fiber - that can handle many, many gigabit/sec. Currently the thing that holds it back is the routers at each end, but they are helped every day by the fact that CPU speeds are getting so darn fast nowadays.

    5. Re:WiFi Anyone?? by snellgrove2 · · Score: 1

      in a word - NOISY

      I think if everyone has an HDTV/Phone/PDA/Wristwatch/HiFi/kitchen sink/you-name-it, its not necessarily a good idea.

      I can see it now, we'll end up IM-ing via PGP secured messaging service, to someone sitting opposite them, because of the 'security issues / privacy' of an analogue conversation..

  12. What are the power requirements? by tstoneman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Does this need more power? I'm afraid as it is about using cell phones so close to my head (Richard Brandon, owner of Virgin refused to use a cell phone without a headset, and he has done stupider things like trying to balloon around the world!).

    I guess the only mitigating factor is that you generally won't be using the 4G features with the phone pressed against your head....

    1. Re:What are the power requirements? by 98jonesd · · Score: 0

      " (Richard Brandon, owner of Virgin refused to use a cell phone without a headset, and he has done stupider things like trying to balloon around the world!)."

      Sorry to troll but I think you mean Richard Branson.

    2. Re:What are the power requirements? by DoctorDeath · · Score: 1

      With poor battery technology not even close to keeping up, you will need either an extension cord always plugged in or get about 30 minutes of battery life.

      --
      Sig temporarily out of service.
    3. Re:What are the power requirements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... refused to use a cell phone without a headset, a..

      whats funny is a headset is probably just as bad for channeling RF into ones head as using it normally (if not worse).
      when you plug the headset in the headphone wire (2ft or so) acts as whats known as a "passive radiator" for the main antenna (as the distance between the real antenna and the headphone cable is so short (1" or so) it (the circuit) essentialy uses the headphones as part of the antenna and by plugging earphones in your ear are essentially plugging the antenna into your head negating the whole point of the safety exercise

      also if the phone is in his jacket pocket he will be warming up his kidneys instead of his brain :).

      so after all of that you might as well just use it normally :)

  13. Names by bsd4me · · Score: 4, Informative

    Who comes up with these names...

    Assuming the poster is referring to ``variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology'', the name describes exactly how the technology works. Without reading a technical paper on the technology, I don't know the exact details, but I know what it is doing and what it isn't doing.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

    1. Re:Names by GeorgeH · · Score: 1

      Well then why isn't it VSF-OFCDM?

      --
      Why can't I moderate something "Wrong" or at least "Grossly Misinformed"?
    2. Re:Names by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...variable spreading factor ... (WSF-...

      Is it a typo, or maybe it's supposed to be "Wearable spreading factor"? The Japanese phones are pretty small, it's possible they've sewn it into a shirt collar or something?

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    3. Re:Names by borroff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At least physicists have the decency to choose names like "gluons" instead of "strong nuclear force gauge bosons". Unless I'm in the field, neither "gluons" nor "variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing" is going to mean that much to me, but "gluons" is a lot easier to say.

    4. Re:Names by frenetic3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because it was created by a wery talented group of Russian mad scientists.

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    5. Re:Names by alphakappa · · Score: 1

      And this is how to split the name to understand it:

      1. Variable spreading factor

      2. Orthogonal frequency (division multiplexing)

      3. Code division (multiplexing)

      Makes a lot of sense to any communications guy when it is named so descriptively (as in, it is informative, not just plain funky)

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    6. Re:Names by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's because it's translated from Japanese. It may mean nothing in a English, but in western alphabet form Japanese, the acronym comes out as

      U.S.E.D.S.C.H.O.O.L.G.I.R.L.P.A.N.T.I.E.S.

      Although longer, it seems infinitely more memorable to certain very lonely Japanese engineer types.

    7. Re:Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the name describes exactly how the technology works

      Sure. And when Geordi reroutes warp power through the main EPS conduits so that the deflector can modulate the verteron pulse, I know exactly what he's doing, too -- even though the technology doesn't exist.

      (Yet. In this timeline. Unless maybe that funny-looking Nazi... Hey!)

  14. Population density helps by giliath · · Score: 5, Informative
    Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless
    Part of the reason they are able to stay ahead of everyone else is the density of the country. It is a lot easier to deploy new technologies like this when they don't have to worry about huge land masses like found in China/USA/Russia, and even somewhat in Europe.
    1. Re:Population density helps by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      Ironically, the first mobilde phones from Ericsson in the mid 80s were developed because of large distances; cables were (are?) even more expensive than the 1st generation mobiles.

    2. Re:Population density helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bullshit. I'll give you an example: The population density of United States is about 31 persons per square km. The population density of Finland is about 16. Which one of these two countries is ahead in cellphone technology again?

      Before you reply that USA has extreme rural areas, remember that we have stuff like Lapland too, and perfect coverage everywhere anyway.

    3. Re:Population density helps by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
      Part of the reason they are able to stay ahead of everyone else is the density of the country.


      Finland and Sweden are also frontrunners in mobile technology, and they are sparsely populated. So your logic fails.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  15. Ahem! by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    their new variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology

    This is a lie!

    I had nothing to do with this!

    (And I don't do variable spreading of my factor. And certainly not in a car going 35 mph.)

    (Ok, now that you've laughed at me, "Vote" in my unofficial presidential poll.)

    1. Re:Ahem! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sure didn't. How you could have? You're an idiot. Developing this kind of thing requires intelligence.

      And they were going at 30kph you son of a gun.

  16. How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by Nerviswreck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Japan is small, The US is huge. Converting the entire japanese network is a meager task compared to converting the entire US network, or even in all the major cities in the US.

    --Nerviswreck

    1. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      fuck!
      why cant anyone admit that the japs are better?

      THE JAPS ARE BETTER THAN AMERICANS IN MANY AREAS, INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATION. ( - that was a period, cant write it UPPERCASE)

    2. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by INeededALogin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Japan is not small. 135 million people, many of which with cell phones that would have to be upgraded.

      The country has large cities, but it has 4 large islands that are completely separate. Not to mention the tons of smaller islands and the extreme separation that the different cities have due to mountains.

      I think the reason that Japan is light years ahead of us is probably due to the public's desire for this type of technology. Most Japanese use their cell phones for email and web surfing. They want and will pay for faster technology. People in the United States are... they won't.

    3. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by paesano · · Score: 1

      Here in the Mountain West we have exteme separation of deserts due to the mountains. It all comes down to poulation density. Where there are people, it is economically feasible to add services, cause there's a chance you'll make money back on your investment. Where I live you have areas with no poulation as far as the eye can see (even if your on top of one of those mountains). Wireless companies are still building infrastructure for 2G networks in order to get coverage on major freeways that have little or no population. Folks in New York expect to have cell-phone coverage when driving along I-70 in Southern Utah!

    4. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      It all comes down to poulation density. Where there are people, it is economically feasible to add services, cause there's a chance you'll make money back on your investment. [...] Folks in New York expect to have cell-phone coverage when driving along I-70 in Southern Utah!

      Even then, you'd have to explain why folks in NYC don't have phones with advanced data services that are still able to work in rural Utah. Population density is certainly one factor, but not the only factor at all. For example, most urban Japanese workers spend considerable amounts of time on a train, rather than driving, to and from work. That means they actually have time to use wireless data services.

    5. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by paesano · · Score: 1
      I guess not enough New Yorkers want those advanced data services. Maybe they'd rather have cell phone service all the way to Wally World. It's hard to imagine another reason to put cell towers up for just the Deer and the Antelope.

      On the other hand, AT&T is supposed to roll out digital coverage in most of rural Utah by the end of June 04 (at 850 MHz). They will also be rolling out EDGE data services (2 1/2 G) at that time. Their service has sucked big time since they went to GSM, but with this new extended coverage at 850 MHz, and EDGE, they could be worth a look again. Hmmm. Maybe those farmers in Southern Utah are more sophisticated than we thought!

    6. Re:How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of us... by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's that...

      And then there's the fact that we are still so busy over here trying to monetize email and instant messaging that the wireless train left the station without us. ;\

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  17. Small island == Small cost of deployment by jjjefff · · Score: 1

    ...how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    It's a whole lot cheaper (especially per user) to deploy all-new equipment on a very small, very densly-populated island.

    1. Re:Small island == Small cost of deployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats just plain stupid! it is far more complex to serve a large number of users access despite a very limited bandwidth.

      correct answer: japaneese ARE better

    2. Re:Small island == Small cost of deployment by jjjefff · · Score: 1

      ...riiiight... and that's why cell phones just don't work in NYC, right?

    3. Re:Small island == Small cost of deployment by TurretMaster · · Score: 1

      Errr...You're beginning to get the same speeds all over Europe, too. And commercially available since a few weeks ago.

      In France, SFR (Vodafone group) annouced here 384kbps available,starting last month...

  18. Because Cell phones weren't distracting enough by VanWEric · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we can drive with one knee, eat with one hand and watch /.-The Movie at 90mph.

    There is a race in technology : Things That Distract Drivers vs Things That Replace Drivers (TTDDvTTRD). If automatic nav doesn't catch up, we will all be victims of our own entertainment.

    Cheers!

    --
    www.olin.edu
    1. Re:Because Cell phones weren't distracting enough by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      You could just -- I don't know -- turn the fucking thing off while driving. My voice mail message actually says "I'm either out of the calling area or driving...leave a message." I'm distracted enough by the iPod, and that's made for one handed operation (and only gets picked up once every hour or so, to skip over the skits on hip-hop records).

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  19. Speed by BearJ · · Score: 1

    Ok, sure it works at 30Kph...but that's under 19Mph! Is speeding up like moving farther from your phone company's CO and using DSL? (slower speed)

    --
    Stand clear of the doors. The doors are now closing.
  20. Bandwidth by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's all very nice, but the real question is: what's the bandiwdth of a station wagon full of telephones barrelling down the highway?

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  21. So let's see... by moehoward · · Score: 5, Funny


    That means that they got....let's see....carry the one...

    135Mb of data through before the battery ran out.

    Pretty good.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
  22. WSF-OFCDM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You sure it's not WTF-OFCDM?

  23. wariable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology"

    now i find it downright rude that you'd imply that the japanese population has trouble pronouncing the Voiced labiodental fricative (commonly known as the letter V).

  24. Basically by puargsss · · Score: 1

    In places like Japan or Korea, you can replace phone systems within a few months or a relatively short amount of time, as compared with the United States, which still doesn't even have coverage in some parts. When you live in a country the size of California, things can get done a lot quicker.

    1. Re:Basically by MrRuslan · · Score: 1

      California is bigger than Japan.

    2. Re:Basically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course, it helps if you are more intelligent...

  25. Simple by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

    Small area to cover. And a population that is willing to send more on the latest gadgets than we are. Heck, most people here just take whatever phone comes with the plan.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the reason is that US is seriously behind on most things important.

    2. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a retard and that sentence makes no sense. Shut-up.

    3. Re:Simple by CarrionBird · · Score: 1

      Is a 3/4/whatever G phone really important?

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  26. How does Japan stay ahead? by sirgoran · · Score: 0

    I'll take a guess at that...

    Their not spending billions on two wars in two countries.

    That and perhaps having a better business model ;)

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.
    1. Re:How does Japan stay ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sprint and verizon are spending billions on wars?

  27. Yes Yes.. by Rytr23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    High speed data is fantastic..but will it prevent me from having dropped calls?

    --
    So many injustices..so little time..
    1. Re:Yes Yes.. by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      High speed data is fantastic..but will it prevent me from having dropped calls?

      Yes. The kid with Kazaa will be soaking up all the bandwidth in the cell, so you won't be able to make a call in the first place.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  28. Am I the only one that is worried? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    While in a car moving at 30kph, DoCoMo engineers managed a peak throughput of 300Mbps and a sustained transfer rate of 135Mbps with their new variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology.

    These days we have problems with people talking on the cell phone while driving. With this bandwidth and video capabilities how soon before we have people watching pr0n and driving? Gives new meaning to the term "spill-over"

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:Am I the only one that is worried? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      with this kind of bandwith, you could integrate a mobile HDTV porn broadcasting studio in you car...

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  29. why Japan is lightyears ahead is... by nomad63 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because the alternative they have, which is to rewire the humongous buildings that they have in the very limited amount of space available.

    Same story with Chine from a different perspective. Wiring the old buildings for phone communications is not feasible fianncially.

    At the end, when alternative is very expensive, people tend to be more creative than what is expected of them. Can be applied to anything, not only wireless or technology...

    --

    __________
    The more I know people, the more I love animals
    1. Re:why Japan is lightyears ahead is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      So not true. Japan has far less skyscrapers and tall buildings than say New York. There aren't 30 million people in the Greater Tokyo Area because of skyscrapers, they're there because it's a huge urban sprawl with 5-15 story buildings. For the most part, these are fairly new buildings too (nobody wants to build longlasting buildings for obvious reasons).

      It's not exactly difficult to wire these buildings. In Tokyo, you can get fiber to the home for an insanely low price (on Western standards). Claiming that the need to rewire buildings is an impetus for wireless is clearly invalid in this case.

      Neither is Japan ahead because of the population density. It may be part of it, but take Finland for example. Their population density is about half that of USA, but even they are lightyears ahead in cell phone technology.

  30. How do they do it? by pegr · · Score: 2, Funny

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Can't tell you how, but why is obvious... You can't run cable through paper walls...

    1. Re:How do they do it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ricepaper walls are the easiest in terms of running cables. All walls should be movable ricepaper or foot-thick concrete, none of this half-assed drywall stuff.

  31. Rehtorical question? by epiphani · · Score: 4, Informative

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Might have something to do with the fact that they have 130 Million people in an area slightly smaller than california.

    Lot less area to provide coverage for. Not to mention 26 million people in Tokyo alone, making it the highest density city on the planet.

    --
    .
    1. Re:Rehtorical question? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      And just like Hong Kong and all these other cramped up asian countries. It costs $20 US to rent a basketball court for an hour, here in the US we got free ones at every public school. Streets are not packed to the point where you rub shoulders with everybody.

      Japan needs to stop bragging about gig fibre in every kid's bedroom etc etc.

    2. Re:Rehtorical question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok, thats just wrong.

      here in sweden, we use wireless internet mostly for people near the north pole, since they dont live very close. in a large city, it is more economical to use wires.

      it is quite easy: we cant get the limited bandwith to be enough for 1 million even if everyone used it only to read their emails

    3. Re:Rehtorical question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'll call your bluff. Take the CIA stats for population density in USA and Finland. Which one of these two countries is ahead in cellphone technology? Don't ever again try to tell me it's an issue of population density.

  32. Japan is not that large... by onion_breath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Because Japan is densely populated on a mall landmass, it's not such a logistical nightmare to have almost all the area covered by high end wireless service. It also can offer a quick market turnaround and a stepping stone into the greater world market.

    --
    this is my sig, be amazed.
    1. Re:Japan is not that large... by murphyslawyer · · Score: 1
      • Because Japan is densely populated on a mall landmass

      Oh no, Godzilla is destroying Nordstrom's!

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
  33. Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by blanks · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From what I understand (never been to Japan), everyone wants the best coolest *insert random item here*. People will upgrade their phones and other gadgets every month, and get rid of their old ones.

    In the US (live in US so cant say the same about other countries), yes people will buy the latest greatest, but will keep it for years, how many people do you know that have cellphones that are 2-3 years old.
    People will only upgrade when their gadgets break, or a new technology comes out they really need. so new phones come out slower, and cheaper (cheap = break easy).

    No point in rushing out the newest greatest items when people will allways wait.

    1. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by JReam · · Score: 1

      People will only upgrade when their gadgets break, or a new technology comes out they really need.

      Unfortunately, this only applies within the boundaries of planned obsolescence.

    2. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by nosphalot · · Score: 1
      BINGO!

      Any one who has every been to Tokyo can tell you that the cell phone display in most sotres is huge. Even the small stores will have something like 20 different models in 10 different colors. Then you have all the little accessories and gadgets to add, like the littel charms that light up and the phone condoms and so on. Phones are definately a status symbol in Japan.

      Japanese will pay for new phones, therefore the market will rush to provide them with new phones.

    3. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it makes sense.. They have nothing to save up for.

      Myself, I'm forgoing release-date video games for $5 bargain-bin titles, gadgets and upgrades because I'm trying to build up for a down payment on a 10 acre lot out in the sticks on which I'd like to build a home.

      If I lived in Japan, where the idea of owning a chunk of land would be out of the question, and the best I could dream for would be a rented apartment, then I'd probably piss my disposable income away on gadgets too.

      Frankly, I don't envy their 4G phones. I pity their overall living conditions. I'm not a city/crowd person.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by Dravik · · Score: 1

      2-3 years? My phone is 5 years old. The company name on the phone is VoiceStream who was bought out by somebody who was then bought out by T-mobile. I chuckle everytime I see a buddy drop his brand new 200 ring tone without a normal ring phone. Mine has been dropped a bunch of times and never fails.

      --
      The purpose of language is communication, If the idea is clear the grammar ain't important
    5. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by Shanep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People will only upgrade when their gadgets break, or a new technology comes out they really need.

      My GSM phone is going on 7 years old. I keep it because it is a mobile telephone, which works well and has a standby time of about 3 weeks or talk time of about 8 hours. Until I find a phone I can rely on to keep me contactable all day almost guaranteed or until it breaks, I will keep it.

      I don't ever want to go back to the days of having a mobile that cuts out before the business day is over and I'm nowhere near a power outlet.

      I see friends who have these super expensive mobiles that do-it-all, but don't last a day if they listen to some mp3's. Keep your old phone and buy an iPod!

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    6. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by Billy_Ray · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that in the US a lot of the reason we don't have the coolest phones is because the phones are locked to providers. Therefore, the providers have to "offer" phones to their users and companies can't just come out with some cool phone and release it to the masses. Having everything go through the providers slows the market for mobile phones (it's sort of like government regulation, but it is corporate regulation).

    7. Re:Simple, they want the best, we want the values. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Frankly, it makes sense.. They have nothing to save up for. Myself, I'm forgoing release-date video games for $5 bargain-bin titles, gadgets and upgrades because I'm trying to build up for a down payment on a 10 acre lot out in the sticks on which I'd like to build a home. If I lived in Japan, where the idea of owning a chunk of land would be out of the question, and the best I could dream for would be a rented apartment, then I'd probably piss my disposable income away on gadgets too. Frankly, I don't envy their 4G phones. I pity their overall living conditions. I'm not a city/crowd person.



      You're kind of right. I've lived in Japan for a little over a year now. I'm currently in one of the five largest cities, but until March, I lived in the middle of nowhere. There are some sprawling suburbs, like the areas around Tokyo (large parts of Chiba, Saitama, and Kanagawa prefectures). But otherwise, from what I've seen here, a place is either fairly dense city or pretty desolate rice paddies. Each has the same pros and cons as it would elsewhere (I'm thinking North America), although there is reliable, if not frequent or super-well-placed, rail service throughout the country.

      NTT DoCoMo has their FOMA service, which is basically a video phone. I remember seeing on some maps at a sales display that the coverage wasn't tremendously broad. In any populated place you'll have it, but if you're out in those more remote places, out in the paddies, you probably won't have the video service.

  34. Let me guess... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    Were they driving the wrong way down a one-way street naked from the waist down and surfing for child porn on a hacked wireless connection? If not they should talk to this man.

  35. Re:Day in the life of a Liberal [Otto] by hoggoth · · Score: 1, Funny

    > ... [all kinds of anal-fisting-gaping-hole-miscellaneous-bodily-flui d-drinking deleted] ...

    I think this is a description of a painting by Hieronymus Bosch...

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  36. how does Japan manage to stay light years ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because DoCoMo has an effective monopoly in a country that has 127 million people ( large mobile market) and is smaller that the state of California ( small network footprint). Think about the carriers in the US that have to support physical wireless networks that spread from Alaska to Florida. Also the demand for new wireless features is HUGE in Japan and people upgrade their phones (and other electronic devices) at a pretty rapid pace compared to the western markets. Mobile wireless in Japan is best compared to the Internet, instead of mobile wireless in the west.

  37. why japan is always ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My theory is that the Japanese have come here from a far superior planet to our own thousands of years ago. They are smarter than the average person, have interesting ceremonies and traditions not seen anywhere else on earth, and their language is designed in a way that makes sense.

    It's not a coincedence that Vulcan in the Star Trek movies looked a lot like some of the scenes in Mortal Kombat (up in the mountains, japanese lookin' temples).

  38. Great. by Snarph · · Score: 2, Funny

    One more feature that will be over-sold and over-priced when it reaches the States.

    I'll be happy if I can just get a working basic connection in the Bay Area (thanks so much, AT&T).

  39. Simple... by tbase · · Score: 0

    "...and how does Japan manage to stay light years ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    Population Dens... Ha! Gotcha! I'm not going to say what 47 other people did...

    The real reason they can stay ahead is two-fold.
    1.) They don't have near as many lawyers per capita and
    B.) They have a different philosophy on devices that "thin the heard" being a "bad" thing.

    --

    666-607: 6th floor apartment of the beast
    1. Re:Simple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

      I agree wholeheartedly. And I would add to your list...

      iii.) Their companies don't rely strictly on gutless Marketing execs to make all their product development decisions.

      The best remedy for America's ability to compete is to close Harvard's Law and Business Schools and fire all their grads. They'll take themselves out eventually (case in point: Jeffrey Skilling), but by that time it'll be too late.

  40. Doppler by bsd4me · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is speeding up like moving farther from your phone company's CO and using DSL? (slower speed)

    The faster you are going means the Doppler effect is more pronounced. Wide Doppler ranges can be a pain to deal with in the receiver.

    --

    (S(SKK)(SKK))(S(SKK)(SKK))

  41. Japan Loves Gadgets by SoopahMan · · Score: 1
    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Three words (well, 2 and some ASCII art).

    Japan <3 Gadgets.

  42. Witty Japan Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they have enormous eyes, they all dress like schoolgirls, and they can't get enough math!

  43. E-mail me if you want to start a REAL wireless ISP by numbski · · Score: 1

    I'm not kidding. 20 people or so who are willing to mortgage their lives away, license this technology and get it out the door.

    300Mbit per sec to anywhere near a tower we can get on????

    I kid you not. We could rule the world...until we get bought out. ;)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  44. Coincidence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?


    Have you heard that weed is popular among a thriving subculture in Japan?

    It was only a question of time before the engineers got a hold of some.

    I can't see how the US can allow the Japanese to outsmoke them.

  45. few cooks = faster innovation by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    It's 'cause Japanese wireless companies tend to work together to advance forward instead of trying to promote their own standards and slowing things down.

    Why do you think we have so many different cellular technologies here in the states...most of them aren't compatible with each other?
    We just need to standardize and streamline (especially the FCC procedures) our wireless so we can get 300Mbps.

    Also, Japanese wireless companies don't try to keep old technology active to milk money off of it; instead they continously innovate and improve the technology to entice customers to upgrade and buy new technology. That's where they make their money.

    1. Re:few cooks = faster innovation by Solandri · · Score: 1
      Why do you think we have so many different cellular technologies here in the states...most of them aren't compatible with each other? We just need to standardize and streamline (especially the FCC procedures) our wireless so we can get 300Mbps.

      We have so many different celluar technologies in the U.S. because the government took a hands-off approach so the free market could decide which technology was best. It worked too. While the rest of the world settled by committee on time-division multiplexing, the major carriers in the U.S. drifted towards code-division multiplexing. The rest of the world is now switching over to code-division mutliplexing because it's better, even with the burden of the patents held by Qualcomm.

      Having all the cooks work together on one standard is certainly faster, but it's only better if you can correctly acertain from the outset which standard would be the best long-term. If you guess wrong, you end up with a bunch of R&D into a dead-end technology (e.g. the huge Japanese investment into analog HDTV). Figuring out the best standard is often a very difficult problem whose importance is as great as the R&D in the technology itself; and the free market is really great at solving that problem (provided it isn't manipulated by lobbyists and monopolists).

    2. Re:few cooks = faster innovation by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

      It worked too.

      that depends on you ask.

      Also, the Japanese have also invested in digital HDTV as well as analog so there will be SOME backward compatibility (in existing satellites; but that was only until they launched the newer digital satellites to replace the old ones).

      Also, TDMA is used by AT&T. (GSM is a TDMA based tech). And the Japanese companies adopted CDMA and CDMA based technology (including 3G) alot faster (and in some cases before) than US companies.

      Another example of the US's unwillingness to move forward rather than stay to milk it is with broadband internet. ADSL technology tops in the 40Mbps down (uplink isn't a dinky 128k btw; somewhere in the 1-8Mbps if not more) range in Japan (FTTH is at 100Mbps, synchronous).

      And in the US, lobbyists (and monopolists) manipulate the technology so much that innovation really suffers. Example? Think firewire. Apple for the longest time, didn't allow the use of 1394's alternate name: firewire.

    3. Re:few cooks = faster innovation by johkir · · Score: 1

      The needs of the many outweigh the needs of a few

      --
      These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
  46. Lightyears ahead of everyone... by raistphrk · · Score: 3, Funny

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    By protecting their secrets with giant anime robots.

    Either that, or they found some ancient, advanced, lost wireless technology and got a patent on it.

  47. Now I can by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    Play Unreal Tournament while crash..er driving my car. Headshot! Multi Kill! mmmm Monster Kill! mmmm Monsterrrrrrrrrrrrchchchc boom.

    Even Better, in UT2k3, I can drive the vehicles. Uhh ohh watch out for that RL, left turn----crash....bang, whoops I meant left arrow, sorry officer.

    As if cell phone distractions weren't bad enough.

  48. Mod parent funny by Wehesheit · · Score: 1

    hahaha

    --
    This P.I.G. will walk on the water, This P.I.G. will walk on the sea, This P.I.G. will walk whereever he wants.
  49. Two more words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tentacle porn

  50. Answers (Requiring thougth :) by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    A very densely populated country, with concentrated cities that allow a high level of money return for every repeater installed. Also, more repeaters imply less distance to the possible target, which allows for more data troughoutput^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hspeed. A gadget-loving population also helps.

    Who comes up with these names?

    Uh? That should be self-evident^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hobvious. Committees, of course.

    (revised by the anti-pedantic spell checker)

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
  51. Huh by Omega1045 · · Score: 1
    variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing

    Is that like multi-modal reflection sorting? (link)

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  52. Are 4G phones considered weapons? by percheron_normand · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to fry a chicken or my boss with such a phone? I mean, 4.9GHz radio signal is really impressive... I'm not sure we'll use those phones here in Europe, where you need a permit to hold a weapon...

  53. Not spamming, FYI. by numbski · · Score: 1

    I'm CCNA nearing CCNP test readiness, have MANY years of ISP running experience, and am a bit fed up with the unlicensed spectrum.

    Licensed technology. Real throughput. Cheap bandwidth abound to link it to.....ah, a network engineer's dream. And nightmare.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  54. Cool name by Genevish · · Score: 1

    variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing

    Wow, that's the coolest name ever...

  55. Note: Requires L-O-S to the base station... by Assmasher · · Score: 3, Informative

    It would be nice to mention that before the furor erupts...

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Note: Requires L-O-S to the base station... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is not true. This is just a prototype - you can easily use rake receivers to combat fading effects (due to non line of sight components)....

      MT

  56. Density of wealth amongst populace by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    More specifically, financial density. Japan is the world's second biggest economy, with an economy roughly half that of the US, or three times bigger than the UK, but with only double the population of the UK. Money is also more equally spread between the rich and poor in Japan. This leads to a relatively high monetary density country-wide, meaning lots of people who can afford high-end services.

    This would explain why other densely populated counties, like Bangladesh, aren't riding high on the wagon.. it's because Japan is rich, has wealth more fairly disitributed, and has a dense population. Scandinavia also has its wealth more fairly spread between its citizens, and also boasts some of the world's most impressive mass technologies.

    1. Re:Density of wealth amongst populace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, today Japan has the world's third largest economy with a GDP of about 3.55 trillion, behind the U.S. (10.4) and China (5.7). In terms of financial density (GDP per capita), Japan ranks 13th in the world (Luxembourg is 1st, U.S. is 2nd). I really can't speak about the distribution of wealth, though, so your point may still hold.

      Anyway, I think wealthy consumers are definitely a factor, but more than that, there seems to be a consumer culture in Japan obsessed with new gadgets that drives an almost instantaneus upgrade cycle. While that applies to a certain percentage of consumers in every country, it appears to be much more prevelant in Japan from this outsiders point of view. This is reflected by the relatively high investment in R&D in Japan compared to other countries (can you say feedback loop?).

    2. Re:Density of wealth amongst populace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If lots of people can afford high-end services, they aren't high-end anymore.

  57. Phone Spam Is the future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think there's much content out there. The only text messages I ever got on my phone were spam. Frankly I haven't been all that pleased with the "miracle" of the mobile phone to begin with. Pr0n on cell-phones is lousy, too,and everyone knows that Pr0n fueled the internet revolution.

    1. Re:Phone Spam Is the future! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pr0n on cell-phones is lousy, too,and everyone knows that Pr0n fueled the internet revolution.

      Just wait until some one makes a phone game with GPS and option of "looking for someone to have sex with now." Think geocaching with sex as the object found. This could easily be the first online game that guys would pay $100 a week for, encourages travel, dating and socialization. The hard part would be finding women out there that would be "found." Hmm. We could have one of those online economies where objects of value could be give to the women that they could trade in for money or status.

  58. Re:their secret is... they're sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually the original parent is funny, you insensitive clod!

  59. Not Density, Not Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not think that either reasons stated previously explain Japan's early adoption of new wireless technologies. For example, in New England, many cities are close in proximity and with a dense population, but wireless reception or adoption is not great. Yes, you can find many hotspots, but that's all they are, hotspots. You cannot walk around Boston and expect to have wireless, 802.11x, reception. And about cellular networks, well, many factors hinder its adoption, such as variety of cell phones, price, and ease of use.

  60. As someone who worked with NTT.. by FatPaulie · · Score: 3, Informative

    NTT is a surprisingly large company (now a group of companies), and the bureaucracy of such a company is staggeringly prohibitive to actually getting anything accomplished.

    We tried launching Wireless access there in 2000 and 2001, and the endless meetings and forms were more than discouraging.

    But the real answer to how NTT DoCoMo (a division of the monster) manages to turn around so fast is that their researchers work with cell researchers from KDDI, J-Phone (now Vodafone), and that other one who nobody uses (TUCA).

    Where does all the funding for research come from? Well, in a country of now 135 million people, there are over 80 million cellular subscribers. A good portion of these are also cellular internet users, paying an extra 100 yen here, 100 yen there for different services.

    There is a LOT more income on a monthly basis to Japanese cellular providers than there is in America, or anywhere else in the world.

    The easy bottom line is that all this cash can be thrown at research, and that this research is further supported by companies like National/Panasonic, Toshiba, Sony, etc who make the phones for Japan.

    The average turn-around time in phone ownership in Japan is 9 months. Your $150 top-of-the-line video-camera/mp3/digital still camera/phone is made obsolete in that short span of time. The furthering of technology by DoCoMo/Vodaphone/etc allows the phone manufacturers to move more units.

    The consumer gets new features at the same monthly price (more or less), a new phone to show off to friends, and better service.

    The providers and hardware manufacturers rake in the cash.

    The cycle supports itself, and it makes everyone happy.

    --
    Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible.
  61. Rate of Adoption by ddelrio · · Score: 1

    The thing is, Japan has investment capital for these research endeavors because their entire population is spread over a very small space. They can make major changes to their infrastructure and spend relatively little to do it. The other reason is that the Japanese, like Europeans, on average seem to have a greater interest in the technology. Part of this is due to standardization--but standardization can't account for all of it. The last time I travelled in Europe, I had a few young adults approach me at a train station and show me their cell phones. Weird, huh?

    1. Re:Rate of Adoption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      and show me their cell phones

      did they also said:

      "hey looooser... look, its GSM and its working!"

  62. Well by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Maybe they don't have risk-averse, office-politics-obsessed middle managers more interested in shitting all over other people's careers than actually building something useful?

    Maybe they have found a way to put capital to work employing people and building new products instead of sitting around a table whining that they might fail.

    First it was cars, then electronics, now animation. So Japan is kicking our ass again? Well boo-fuckin-hoo.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  63. Lightyears Not! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    One working example on one day does not put them lightyears ahead of anyone. An installed, working system that people can use -- and afford -- might.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  64. Who and how? by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    I came up with the name!! Why? What's wrong with it? You should have seen the Engrish they came up with the first time around!

    And to answer the "How" question, the answer is simple! Smaller cost of roll-out, fewer zoning regulations (do they even KNOW what zoning is in Japan?) and a high-rate of initial adopters all spells a quick update of technology on their island nation.

  65. America doesn't like radios by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has been very restrictive when it comes to radio frequencies and uses. Japan has some of the most liberal laws when it comes to that. Thus, Japan has the freedom to do whatever research and application they want. Almost anything anyway. And, the japanese love science more than anything else it seems like. And they really like wireless.

    Also, the Japanese have more motivation to develop wireless technologies. A wireless infrastructure in such a small area would be more efficient, less expensive, and consume far less land/space/whatever than their wired equivalent. So they devote more to research than others.

  66. how does Japan manage to stay ahead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since they lost the second world war they were not allowed to have a army and had to do something to turn the ecoomony around and rebuild the mess that was made. They funneled enormous amounts of money into R&D since they couldn't spend it on anything else.

    That's why they are ahead of us in anything related to technology.

  67. Lets not forget... by Czernobog · · Score: 1

    ... that 4G does not exist. What exists is a memorandum of understanding as far as the expected and required performance shall be.
    There are no technical specifications for the time being, nothing concrete.
    There's no guarantee that NTT's 4G will be the chosen 4G implementation, neither is any guarantee that NTT's implementation shall be the one to gain the biggest market share (see the FDD and TDD UMTS modes and just when a compromise was reached, China come up with their own system...)

    --
    /. Where the truth
  68. Your variable spreading factor style is nothing! by The+Kow · · Score: 1

    variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology

    I hear this is really only a placeholder to the followup technology, SUPER MEGA ULTRA HYPER-variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing COMBO RAVE, ULTIMATE TOURNAMENT EDITION (SMUH-WSF-OFCDM-CR,UTE) downstream technology.

    Just a rumor. I work for Nintendo you know. In Japan. I have connections to this sort of thing.

    --
    Moo
  69. NTT DoCoMo's 4G Tests Hit 300Mbps by ScurvyDawg · · Score: 1

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    They reverse engineer alien technology of course. I thought everyone knew that.

    Jeeez.

  70. What VS-OFCDM is by TheSync · · Score: 2, Informative

    VS-OFCDM (variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency AND code division multiplexing) is a special case of MC-CDMA (multi-carrier CDMA).

    CDMA has lots of advantages for ease of frequency-reuse, as you can have a lot of people on the same frequency, but each one spread with different codes.

    OFDM has a lot of resistance against fading (i.e. signal going in and out as you move through diffracted and relected signal peaks and valleys), because you are putting out your signal on a wide range of frequencies. You also get additional frequency diversity from OFDM.

    Put them together by doing CDMA spreading first and OFDMing the result, and as much like in the combination of peanut butter and chocolate that results in peanut butter cups, you get an excellent result!

    This paper and this paper gives some background.

    VS-OFCDM changes the spreading factor adaptively based on cell structure, channel load, radio link conditions, etc.

  71. It's all about the work ethic. by solios · · Score: 1

    The Japanese have that whole "honor" thing going, culture-wide, which I'm sure is a contributing factor. There's also the fact that they approach business the way our generals approach warfare. When was the last time you heard of a general firing several platoons, outsourcing munitions resupply and comminucations to India, running the Division into the ground and bouncing on to the next Division with a severance package the size of a smaller country's GNP?

    Of course, our Generals have to report to the penultimate PHBs, which nicely breaks my analogy.

    Japan is very big on buying Japanese. America, conversely, is very big on buying Cheap, especially if it's Better (witness what Nintendo and Sony did to Atari; Toyota et al. to Detroit). American management doesn't seem to give two shits about American culture, prestige, prowess, capability, standing, or advance- they're in it for the money, focused on the short term, and are running American tech industry into the ground. :|

    I know Japan outsources some of its animation to Korea (and dude, you can tell)- but what about their high-tech industry? Physical area and population density aren't the only factors!

  72. DoS by milamber3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't keep up much on mobile phone tech. so this is probably nothing new but with this kind of speed are we likely to see trojaned phones contributing to Spam remailing and DDoS when they start spreading to the masses and incorporating more user friendly software (read exploit friendly)?

  73. Bottleneck by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 1

    One fundamental challenge for even 3G (such as 1xRTT, up to 144kbps) is the bandwidth of the cell site's backhaul link. With 3G, instead of bringing maybe one or two T1's to a cell site, carriers have to bring at least one more. In many cases, wireless broadband is completely overbearing for cells that already drop calls due to overloading. When you realize that each point-to-point T1 costs about a grand a month, you'll understand why deploying high-speed cellular data is so cost-prohibitive, and why this "4G" will never materialize in the US.

  74. Shared bandwidth? by chill · · Score: 1

    Isn't that shared, not switched, bandwidth? What happens to the speed when you aren't the only one in the whole damn country using the pipe?

    Just like 802.11b -- where throughput drops proportionally to the number of active users.

    -Charles

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  75. That fast enough... by SteamyMobile · · Score: 1

    Fast enough for mobile porn. We're going to launch an i-mode site later this year hopefully...

  76. VSF by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 1

    WSF is obviously a /. typo. Even on NTT DoCoMo's own website they refer to it as VSF-OFCDM.

    I found a good PDF Presentation from NTT DoCoMo explaining in detail VSF-OFCDM. Of interest is its use of Turbo codes for the channel encoding (Turbo codes were mentioned in a previous Slashdot story), and that the uplink bandwidth of the system is 40MHz versus the downlink bandwidth of 101.5MHz. Very interesting stuff!

    --
    "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
  77. 2002 Estimates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    JAPANESE COMMUNICATIONS

    Radio Broadcast Stations: 325
    Radios: 120,500,000
    Television Broadcast Stations: 211
    Televisions: 86,500,000
    Mainline Telephones: 60,381,000
    Mobile Phones: 63,880,000
    Internet Service Providers: 73
    Internet Users: 47,080,000

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA COMMUNICATIONS

    Radio Broadcast Stations: 10,304
    Radios: 575,000,000
    Television Broadcast Stations: 1,500
    Televisions: 219,000,000
    Mainline Telephones: 194,000,000
    Mobile Phones: 69,209,000
    Internet Service Providers: 7,800
    Internet Users: 166,000,000

  78. I think I'm turning Japaneser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    Perhaps Japan gets more anual UFO crashes per year than in the US (it's been proven they are attracted to neon signs resembeling panda bears). The higher the number of crashed UFOs the more likely that peices of technology will be recoverable.

  79. What it means by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    It uses both frequency division multiplexing and code division multiplexing.

    That means that they split their frequency allocation into different bands, and then within each band they use Code Division Multiplexing to let multiple systems transmit at the same time.

    Orthoganal seems superfluous to me - Essentially it says that the code patterns will be chosen so that no two transmitters overlap (for lack of a better laymans explanation).

    CDM involves transmitting a large number of bits for each 'real' bit of data. The ratio of transmitted bits to real bits is the spreading factor.

    Signals with a higher spreading factor can be received amongst more noise, but can carry correspondingly fewer bits. This is like 802.11b does when it drops down to 5.5Mb/s from 11Mb/s.

    I think we've covered it all.

    1. Re:What it means by IncohereD · · Score: 2, Informative

      Orthoganal seems superfluous to me - Essentially it says that the code patterns will be chosen so that no two transmitters overlap (for lack of a better laymans explanation).

      Are you sure you know what OFDM is? It basically involves overlapping signals on a series of overlapping frequencies, but with different intensities at different frequencies. And each channels set of intensities is orthagonal to each other. Which makes the 'O' decidely non-redundant, as this is hardly traditional FDMA. Think of it as CDMA peformed on an FFT.

      Your description of CDMA left a little to be desired as well, but its hard to express laymanwise, I agree.

    2. Re:What it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no.

      OFDM uses multiple simultainious sub-carriers (which do not overlap), unlike DSSS, which uses single sub-carriers in sequence.

      And... No, no, no.

      802.11b is changing it's modulation when it falls back (CCK/BPSK), not the spreading code (DSSS, or OFDM in case of a/g).

      FHSS and DSSS basically just move a single carrier around really fast to "spread", OFDM is more like a FFT on a much more complex carrier (usually QAM-64 or something, instead of CCK).

    3. Re:What it means by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      My apologies.

      It's been a while since i studied this. I was connecting the orthogonal with CDMA since you typically generate mathematically orthogonal codes, such that it's not possible to create any one code with any sum of the other codes.

      Your explanation makes more sense.

  80. already have it by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    Doom has been ported to the Symbian Series 60 platform.

  81. Corp America makes more money keeping us behind by bensin · · Score: 1

    My Opinion; When a new technology comes out everyone pretty much has access to it. You can pay someone to recreate or reverses engineer it, if you have enough cash. Corporate America has access to all the resources they need to do that. When the Japanese come up with an idea they maxed out it's potential and then sold it. What Americans do it make it mediocre, market it as the best then sell you an upgrade. That's 2X the money. Ex. Modems started off with the 300bps modems on the same phone lines that you are using now. With the same phone lines we got up to 56Kpbs. Every 6 month modem speed just doubled why. It's more profitable that way.

  82. Japan and Technology Deployment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    Take a land area the size of California. Now remove 90% of that land area because it's uninhabitable due to mountains, coastal water shifts, and the like.

    Provide wireless access technologies to one third to one half of the US population in that area. It's easier to do when you have less to deploy, or redeploy.

  83. The advancing of the Japanese Toys by kyoko21 · · Score: 1

    Part of the reason Japanese 'toys', i.e. cell phones are far more advanced than their U.S. cousins is mainly due to their behavior in how they consume data services. One example is most metropolitan area rail services and their schedules are accessible via their cell phones. Considering the high reliance of the Japanese population up the rail system as a means of primary transportation, any means to increase the accessibility of these services would make their customers happy.

    Not to mention, Samsung is also planning rolling out digital TV to cell phone so any high speeed would be greatly appreciated.

    To put it lightly, the Japanese population is at best a good comparison to the BORG from Star Trek. They are the ultimate consumer and they will consume like there is no tomorrow.

    *sigh* I miss Japan :-(

  84. Wow cool name... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ..never mind the technology, my techno-analfabetic friends will certainly look up to me when I go tell them about the newest gadget I got:
    "A variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing downstream device."
    "Wow... does that come with an optical mouse ?"

    Can't wait to gloat :)

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  85. Wariable? by James+Lewis · · Score: 1
    "variable spreading factor orthogonal frequency code division multiplexing (WSF-OFCDM) downstream technology"

    I guess they must spell variable wariable.

  86. So When Exactly by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Are bandwidth prices going to go down enough to make this feasable for the masses. I'm sure that's nice but I dont see DSL, Colocation, and other providers upping the ante on bandwidth anywhere. Most people have even seen their speedy DSL connections hacked time and time again until they're at 256/64 vs the 1.544/768 many started with when DSL became available. Even when I first got a cable modem through RoadRunner back in 2000 in NC during the testing phase and for a short while afterwards it was working at nearly 6mbit and 2mbit up.

    Today I'm hard pressed to find anything better though speakeasy has many beat for the price.

    I can get similar performance here but the prices are double speakeasy's are and they would limit me to 10 gigs of transfer a month. No thanks.

    Right now my best option for anything better than DSL is Verizon Wireless's EvDO which will provide 2mbit peak both ways. But there's not a wireless technology that's not lag ridden becuase of constant retransmissions due to lost packets over the air interface.

    Landline providers would still have no incentive to up their speeds and make their lines actually usefull for a chance. Seems they cant get past the fact that 99.95% of their customers habits wouldnt really change all that much unless there were some killer broadband apps out there which there is not becuase nobody will bring up the speeds.

  87. manifest density by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    That density that brought you bandwidth first also takes it away first. Everyone shares the same total bandwidth per area (air is the wireless "segment"), so you're all paying for the same segment. That achieves critical mass sooner, but all those people have to split it. And wireless scales over larger areas with low incremental costs. So thanks for driving the R&D expenses, early adopters - lower density gets the benefits, by being first to be second!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  88. magic numbers? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The company said that the test achieved a maximum downstream data rate of 300Mbps ...
    The frequency bandwidth[s] for the test [are] 100MHz..."


    How do they get 3bits per cycle? Nyquist frequency limits mean 100MHz could optimally carry 50Mbps, not 6 times that in an actual test.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:magic numbers? by muonzoo · · Score: 3, Informative
      How do they get 3bits per cycle? Nyquist frequency limits mean 100MHz could optimally carry 50Mbps, not 6 times that in an actual test.


      Hmm. Perhaps you should consider the technology name. Much like the old quadrature based encodings, the orthogonal nature of the encoding will permit multiple bits per cycle. Othogonal carriers would be independent of one another, and therefore, be something that could be sampled independently.

      Do not confuse what Nyquist has to say about sampling a single signal with the numbers presented. Each orthogonal component is a new axis upon which they can mux a data carrier (in the simplest sense).
    2. Re:magic numbers? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Is that how their elaborately named signaling works? Because they say they're signalling in 100MHz centered on about 4.5GHz. Are they simultaneously signalling on several base frequencies within that band? I'd investigate the VSF-OFCDM details, but the acronym-maki is so dense, and you seem to have a taste for it.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:magic numbers? by achurch · · Score: 1

      How do they get 3bits per cycle? Nyquist frequency limits mean 100MHz could optimally carry 50Mbps, not 6 times that in an actual test.

      You're extrapolating from the wrong number. Quoting the article (emphasis mine):

      The frequency bandwidths for the test are 100MHz in width with the 4.635GHz radio signal at its center, and 30MHz in width with the 4.9GHz radio signal at its center for the downstream and upstream channels, respectively.

      The frequency being used for downstream transmission is 4.635GHz (+/- 50MHz), which implies a Nyquist limit of 2317.5 (+/- 25) Mbps. The 100MHz figure you quote is the bandwidth used by the test, not the frequency.

    4. Re:magic numbers? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that, too, except that they mentioned that these are the respective channels. Just as eg. 802.11b offers 11Mbps in a band around about 2.5GHz, these wireless systems use a hi-freq carrier, but modulate in a narrow band around it, per channel. So unless your take on their actual channel refers to the actual VSF-OFCDM modulation scheme, and the writer of the original article is misleading, someone's going to have to bite the bullet, and read the actual VSF-OFCDM spec :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    5. Re:magic numbers? by jquirke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you are confusing the Nyquist Theorem with Shannon's Law.

      Shannon's Law states the maximum error free digital bandwidth b bits/s of an a slice of spectrum c Hz wide is:

      b = c.log2(1+s)

      Where s is the signal-to-noise ratio. Thus, in this case, where b=300000000 and c=100000000 s = 7, or 8.5dB, not an unrealistic expectation.

      Of course, no current form of error correction coding approaches the ideal Shannon's Law, however reasonably recently developed Turbo Codes have come reasonably close.

      The sort of modulation/multiplexing technique they would be using is a Wideband CDMA technique, similar to that used by UMTS and CDMA2000 wideband technologies.

      Putting it simply, the bits are mapped onto a constellation in the complex plane which rotates and changes the amplitude of the carrier. The signal is spread using 2 codes - an Orthogonal code which has poor autocorrelation properties (but ideal cross-correlation properties across codes - hence the orthogonal term), and finally a PN sequence which has excellent autocorrelation properties.

      I'm not too familiar with this technology, but I can make some guesses how they might have gained speed improvements over UMTS would be:

      - Very wideband - 100MHz vs 5MHz
      - More precise QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) - UMTS allows upto QPSK (2 bits per symbol) or QAM-16 (4 bits per symbol). Perhaps this technology has extended this QAM-64 (6 bits per symbol).

    6. Re:magic numbers? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks - that is a very clear description of the interplay of Shannon and Nyquist signaling limits, that I will use in the future.

      If I'm reading you right, the modulation you describe technique uses two semi-independent signaling characteristics together, modeled as a complex number (a+bi), for each value over time. Are they modulating both frequency and amplitude, with a fixed correlation between them? Why not just modulate them both independently, with no correlation? Maybe they do, which is why they call their technique "orthogonal". Or maybe they correlate, but in a varying correlation degree, which itself encodes a value.

      It looks like I'll at least have to study some QAM, if not VSF-OFCDM. I always wondered how they got "baud" to be different from "bps", in the old DECWriter IIIs I used to connect to the DARPANet.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    7. Re:magic numbers? by achurch · · Score: 1

      Hmm, good point . . . and I don't happen to have a copy of the spec handy, so I guess for now I'll just assume there's some interpretation of their numbers that makes 300Mbps possible--or that something got lost in translation. (:

    8. Re:magic numbers? by jquirke · · Score: 1

      The 'orthogonal' component is referring to the spreading codes used in the multiplexing component. It means the spreading codes have zero cross-correlation. This form of CDMA has essentially two components - the actual mapping of bits to symbols (i.e. QAM, QPSK, etc) and then increasing the bandwidth of a signal, summing it with all other channels originating from the same device (i.e. control channels, voice channels, etc), and then scrambling it.

      The actual baseband carrier is 'spun' in both amplitude and phase (and thus indirectly by the laws of frequencies, frequency) by the multiplication of the complex number. In the case of QAM-16 for example, a constellation of 16 points in the complex plane will correspond to each possible 16 values of 4 bits. When those bits are sent to the transmitter, it looks up those bits in the constellation, which corresponds to some complex number a+bj (which conseqently spins the phase of the carrier by arctan(b/a) radians, and multiplies the amplitude by sqrt(a^2+b^2).

      At this point the 'modulation' effectively ends and the 'multiplexing' takes over. However, the multiplexing is quite closely integrated with the modulation process.

      It's important to remember that in a CDMA system, the complex symbols are not modulated directly to the carrier. In the case of UMTS for example, they are first spread into a series of complex chips by a real-valued spreading sequence they might looks something like

      { {-1, 1, 1, -1} {1, 1 ,1 -1} ...}

      for a spreading factor of 4 (which maps each symbol into a sequence of 4 chips).

      Then the chips are scrambled by a complex-valued scrambling code which is typically generated by some PN-derived sequence such as a Gold code. The scrambling code does not increase the bandwidth of the signal, unlike the spreading code.

    9. Re:magic numbers? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      The high signal value of these modulation tech posts is dragging the entire S/N ratio of Slashdot way up! You're blowing the curve!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  89. Channel size is the key by sbraab · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What you never see mentioned is channel size. If you read the article it says that they use a 100MHz wide downlink channel and a 30MHz wide uplink channel. When you consider that in the US current cellular channels run between 1.25 and 5MHz wide and the carriers usually don't have more than 25MHz per market it doesn't seem to make economic sense.

    What you really need to look for in radio technology is spectral efficiency or bits per hertz per second. When you do the math this isn't that great of a technology, it just uses big channels.

  90. _Staying_ ahead of somebody who doesn't move... by jelle · · Score: 1

    "how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    Just to stay that much ahead to the US for wireless phone services, all they needed to do is virtually nothing for at least the last three years. At least, that's how long it seems to me that the technology of US wireless companies has been standing still now. Ok, so now you get 600 minutes, evenings and week-ends calling, for the price that three years ago got 300 minutes calling. Whooptydoo. Crap.

    --
    --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  91. the short version by spare.dave · · Score: 1

    Since this is an article on Japanese cell phones, let me save people reading the comments a little time. These articles pop up about once a month and they don't seem to deviate much.

    - Someone posts question of why US is so far behind.
    - Americans get pissed off and post that they don't need these newfangled gadgets. A thousand descriptions of beaten up seven year old phones follows...
    - Godzilla joke
    - Giant robot joke
    - People living in Japan post long comments, but really just want to show off their phones
    - Soviet Russia Godzilla joke

  92. Slow Adoption at Corporate Level by man2525 · · Score: 1

    "...and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    or most entertainment technologies for that matter...Japanese companies are far more willing to adopt new technologies than American companies. U.S. companies want to wring every last red cent they can out of existing technologies. Does anyone remember the fight to get broadcasters to adopt HDTV? HDTV was on the books since the mid-80s. The networks bitched about the equipment costs and wanted to cram more channels into the new bandwidth made available through a side-effect from HDTV called narrowcasting. Ultimately, the government stepped in, and said start working on HDTV.

    On a side note, I'm now damn confused about cellular data service. I was looking forward to U.S. adoption of UMTS-enabled phones so that when I went on a trip to Europe next August I could get broadband. My hopes were pinned on ATT Wireless fulfilling its contract with DoCoMo by rolling out W-CDMA and UMTS in four American cities. Why is DoCoMo using OFCDM? Any help on this subject is appreciated...

  93. You missed the other end of the bandwidth by Shennan · · Score: 1
    I'll start by saying these are great speeds. But one thing no one seems to have noticed is how much physical bandwidth it takes up:
    The frequency bandwidths for the test are 100MHz in width...
    Current technology (3G) uses 1-5MHz bandwidths. So they're starting with 25-100 TIMES the amount of raw materials as current technologies. No wonder they can get better transmit rates. If I had 25-100 56k modems in my PC I could get transfer rates that blow most "broadband" connections away. Seeing as we're currently running 7Mbps over a 5MHz link in trials, this isn't a huge step up.
  94. Japan Only needs... by skogs · · Score: 1
    Japan only needs about 25 cell towers to cover their entire frickin country. If all we cared about was something the size of Maine...we'd be pretty proud of our accomplishments too.

    America is big. We need big solutions. As soon as their engineers can make our phones do troposcatter at that data rate...let me know and I'll pop the cork.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  95. Get Your Porn FAST! by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    Just what we need - live direct porn straight from the bedroom/studio to the nearest phone next to you on the bus!

    The Christians are gonna love this! Hey, Ashcroft! Wanna move from Justice over to the FCC? Oh, wait, Powell's already there!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Seriously, folks, it will be ten or twenty years before this tech is *allowed* in the US...if ever.

    A few more years of the Japanese doing this sort of thing, and they may find US troops standing on THEIR street-corners shooting civilians at checkpoints.

    Of course, think of the spam possibilities!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  96. How Japan is "lightyears" ahead of the US by Pingla · · Score: 1

    The ones of you who claim the reason is Japan's population density is only halfway correct. NTT DoCoMo does not put up full coverage all over Japan, they start in the big cities, something that could have been easily implemented in countries such as the US as well. When DoCoMo launched its FOMA service (3G) they focused on Tokyo, if you lived in the countryside, and yes, there are plenty of rural areas in Japan, would not receive any signals. The reason for Japan's success in staying ahead is far more complex.

    1. Young people often live at home up to the age of 30. They start working pretty early, not making a lot of money, but without many expenses, they have a lot of money to spend.

    2. Most handset manufacturers in the Japanese market are located in Japan. This enables them to customize their product for one market only, increasing the chances of them being accepted by the customers.

    3. Cell phones, or keitais as they are called in Japanese, have become sort of fashion objects. NTT DoCoMo pushes out new series of handsets once a year, having the latest series is a must. If you walk down streets in downtown Tokyo like Shibuya, you will see that after only a month or so from the launch of a new series most people around you have replaced their old one with a new.

    There are several other reasons that I won't go into here.

  97. Phone bills go UP by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Considering I pay something like 5 cents per Kb for cell internet, it's only going to cost me 843.75$ per second to download all the l33test warez to my cell phone.

    Yay technology.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  98. More Engineer than Lawers by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 1
    - Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?

    This is what a contry that produces more engineers than lawers is capable of doing. What's the ratio in North America?

  99. Wireless Access Point by SeXy_Red · · Score: 1

    Any chance of getting technology similar to this into a WAP?

    --

    This sig was generated by a barrel of trained kittens for SeXy_Red (550409).

  100. How Japan Manages by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Who comes up with these names, and how does Japan manage to stay lightyears ahead of everyone else in wireless?"

    They actually invest in long term research as a society- as opposed to being tied to the three month bottom line and treating stockholders like they were gods.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.