Slashdot Mirror


How To Make Friends on the Telephone

Dan writes "What a wonderful find--it seems since the internet, we've forgotten the correct way to communicate with people. So here is a book to teach us the proper etiquette, as well as how to handle complex modern communications devices."

327 comments

  1. -1 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    By a fucking ad and support slashdot instead of posting it as a story please.

    1. Re:-1 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By a fucking ad and support slashdot instead of posting it as a story please.

      Considering the topic of the book, I think this this is pretty darn funny.

      Oh wait. Piss off and die all you freakin geeks. Get a life, so on and so forth.

    2. Re:-1 ad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By a fucking ad

      "Buy".

  2. as i learned last night in a dance club... by phaetonic · · Score: 2, Funny

    talking over the phone, via e-mail is not as clear cut as body language

    1. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by armando_wall · · Score: 4, Funny

      talking over the phone, via e-mail is not as clear cut as body language.

      I think that I can express myself better over the phone, thank you. Going to a club and using my body language while dancing could send the message "Hey, ladies, our children could be beaten up everyday at school!".

    2. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Dinosaur+Neil · · Score: 3, Funny

      My body language seems to translate as, "Do as I say and no one gets hurt..."

      --
      "I'm a scientist! I don't think, I observe!" - Dr. Clayton Forrester
    3. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL H0ti3. U know I am so l33t3. L3t g0 s0m3wh3r3 kewl aight. Nod 8p

      How can I possibly say that over the phone and not sound like a retard?

    4. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " LOL H0ti3. U know I am so l33t3. L3t g0 s0m3wh3r3 kewl aight. Nod 8p How can I possibly say that over the phone and not sound like a retard?"

      You implying you make yourself look 'cool' with it on-line ?

    5. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      I can very adeptly express through body language that eating Mexican food then exercising vigorously is perilous. This would be impossible through e-mail.

    6. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      LOL H0ti3. U know I am so l33t3. L3t g0 s0m3wh3r3 kewl aight. Nod 8p

      How can I possibly say that over the phone and not sound like a retard?

      I realize that I'm old and I don't "get" IM, but I have to tell you: You look pretty silly saying it that way here, too.
    7. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by B747SP · · Score: 1
      I realize that I'm old and I don't "get" IM

      'Getting' IM wouldn't help you here. That's not IM-speak, that's 'tard speak.

      --
      I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
    8. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Moonelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are posting on Slashdot and expecting us to believe you went to a dance club?

    9. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A book from Ma Bell?? Huh?

    10. Re:as i learned last night in a dance club... by Orick · · Score: 1


      I suppose that's better than "Don't hurt me!"...

      --
      Kirby

  3. complex modern communications devices by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Funny

    as well as how to handle complex modern communications devices

    Dude, this is /. , if people here don't already know how to handle these things, who knows?

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:complex modern communications devices by Moofie · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:complex modern communications devices by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you must have blown a funny fuse or something.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    3. Re:complex modern communications devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you must have chirurgically removed your lower ribs to be able to suck your own dick.

  4. Ok, thats great by random_culchie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like we will have to phone the webmaster and tell him he will soon been /.ed. Whats the proper way to do that?

    1. Re:Ok, thats great by arieswind · · Score: 2, Funny

      who knows, the page with that info is /.ed atm

    2. Re:Ok, thats great by random_culchie · · Score: 1

      the irony is delicious..

    3. Re:Ok, thats great by cgenman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Recently a friend of ours was trying to get a ride to a party, but didn't start trying to contact us until after she was in our area. She called a few times until her cell battery died. She borrowed someone's computer at a cafe to e-mail us. She IM'ed us. She called from a payphone. She got frantic.

      She did everything but come up and ring our doorbell. Which would have worked: we were at home.

      Sometimes technology can cause people to forget the obvious ways of doing things.

    4. Re:Ok, thats great by random_culchie · · Score: 1

      Thats good advice.
      Can you call up to the webmaster and tell him?
      Just don't let on you use slashdot because there is definatly a few downsides to talking to someone face to face...

    5. Re:Ok, thats great by fore1337 · · Score: 0

      yeah, I kinda get like this when balancing my checkbook. Of course I can do all of the calcultions on the back of a napkin, ...but if I don't have EXCEL fired up and ready to organize my monthly expenses I get irritated. sigh* what a looser am I.

    6. Re:Ok, thats great by arieswind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thats great, but, if you were home.. why didnt you pick up the phone any of the times she called? or reply to her email? or respond to her IM? What may have seemed an obvious way 20 years ago, really isnt that obvious or practical anymore. If she really did try all those options and could not contact you, it would be safe to assume that either you werent home, or dont wish to be bothered.

    7. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sometimes technology can cause people to forget the obvious ways of doing things.

      She was probably trying to avoid pissing you off. Over the years, I've rarely gotten someone upset by calling them or sending them a message, but I've had many who stopped talking to me or chewed me up on the spot because I knocked on their door (yes, even when there was an emergency). Your friend had probably thought of the idea but dismissed it because she's had similar experiences.

      It's sad but most likely, your friend wasn't as much the problem as our collective attitudes tending towards anti-socialism.

      -hadohk

    8. Re:Ok, thats great by BxT · · Score: 1

      Wait- I know this guy- he's a neighbor- I'll go knock on his door and tell him his server has been /.ed.

    9. Re:Ok, thats great by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Domain Name:CONTACTSHEET.ORG
      Created On:04-Apr-2003 06:55:51 UTC
      Last Updated On:07-Jan-2004 23:20:44 UTC
      Expiration Date:04-Apr-2005 06:55:51 UTC
      Registrant Name:scott steffens
      Registrant Street1:6504 17th Ave NW
      Registrant City:Seattle
      Registrant State/Province:WA
      Registrant Postal Code:98117
      Registrant Country:US
      Registrant Phone:+1.2067825664
      Registrant Email: SPAMPROTECTEDssATlittleraincom
      Admin Name:scott steffens
      Tech Name:scott steffens

    10. Re:Ok, thats great by graybeard · · Score: 1

      I share an office with another guy.
      When he wants to tell me something, he IMs me.

    11. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > She did everything but come up and ring our doorbell. Which would have worked: we were at home.
      > Sometimes technology can cause people to forget the obvious ways of doing things.

      In the case of your female friend, it sounds more like she suffered from stupidity, not forgetfulness.

      Sorry but you know you thought it when you witnessed it.

    12. Re:Ok, thats great by dmanny · · Score: 1
      Hell, it was slashdotted when I tried but even that was not without humor:
      The operation timed out when attempting to contact contactsheet.org.

      That is almost on a par with one that happened looking up something for my kid. I do not universally grant permission for cookies. So hitting keebler.com resulted in:

      The site keebler.com wants to set a cookie.

      My type of messages.

      --
      All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
    13. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean their anti-social behaviour.

    14. Re:Ok, thats great by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, friends that chew you out on the spot when you knock on the door in an emergency have brain problems. I would truly hesitate to call them friends, although there is another F-word that would certainly apply. Anti-social attitudes be damned: there are certain aspects of friendship that should transcend our technological debauchery. That is, unless the meaning of "friend" has been altered beyond recognition.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:Ok, thats great by erick99 · · Score: 1
      Insightful? A diatribe on why being simple-minded and lazy is the fault of the person she was trying to contact? Look, if she couldn't try his house before eating a bunch of batteries and then tearing through an array of technological devices that also communicated, then she is an idiot. He may have been watching tv or otherwise away from the computer and/or the phone. Or, is it his *job* to watch out for communications from this dim-witted friend?

      Cheers!

      Erick

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    16. Re:Ok, thats great by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Damn straight. I'm up for shooting kids wanting to sell me candy bars in the head for knocking on my door. But anyone I like, respect, and would like to see happy (my personal working definition of friend) is more than welcome to knock on my door anytime of the day or night. Hell most of them have the code to my garage door and are welcome to walk in. So yea I'm as misanthropic as anybody but friends are friends and they should *not* be afraid to contact friends in any way they need to.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    17. Re:Ok, thats great by maskedbishounen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...but it's his job to answer the door bell?

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    18. Re:Ok, thats great by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      If she didn't have a ride to the party... ...why would she have a ride to go to their house and knock on their door...

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    19. Re:Ok, thats great by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Which do you find easier to ignore, email which is meant to be a disconnected medium anyway, IM which requires you to sit in front of the computer, the phone which allows you to pretend not to be home, or the door where you know that the person knocking saw your car in the driveway?

      Ever been out in the yard or garden? No email, no IM, no phone, but you might happen to notice a friend walking by.

      Answering the door isn't a responsibility (unless they have uniforms and badges) but it certainly is the most likely method of getting a response assuming they are home.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    20. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subway. Thank Jeebus for the great Boston subway system.

    21. Re:Ok, thats great by geeber · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm up for shooting kids wanting to sell me candy bars in the head for knocking on my door.

      Curious. I've never had anybody try to sell me a candy bar in the head before. And do they put the candy bar in the head as a result of knocking on the door? Or is the desire to sell caused by the knocking, and then the candy bar is added to the head after the fact?

      Quite an existential dilemma you have there. No wonder you just want to shoot the damn kids and be done with it.

    22. Re:Ok, thats great by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Hard to communicate with people far away by sitting, Emerson style, under a fucking bush.

      If somebody is expecting to rendezvous with me, and I call them and email them and IM them and do all the things I normally do that puts me in touch with that person, and they don't respond, I'm not going to drop $20 in cab fare to go bang on their door and find out that they're at Aunt Tillie's unexpected funeral.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a looser am I.

      Well, you could try giving a damn about spelling, for starters...

    24. Re:Ok, thats great by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
      That is, unless the meaning of "friend" has been altered beyond recognition.
      Yes, the definition has been altered beyond recognition in this pluralistic & relativistic world. I'm sure that's what the grandparent poster was trying to hammer away @.

      The rules of the game have changed.
    25. Re:Ok, thats great by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Sometimes technology can cause people to forget the obvious ways of doing things.

      Yes, it can. And sometimes the inertia of an installed system will lead us to think that the ettiqette of a situation hasn't changed.

      It's very, very rarely that anyone stops by my home without calling first. Heck, a lot of the time I have people call from downstairs, instead of using the buzzer.

    26. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She died again?

      Scheeze, no wonder she doesn't return my calls.

    27. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comrade Coward, may I borrow a cup of sugar?

    28. Re:Ok, thats great by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Thats great, but, if you were home.. why didnt you pick up the phone any of the times she called?

      Because the telephone is useless. Nobody actually answers the phone any more. Ever try to conduct business by phone? It is absolutely impossible.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    29. Re:Ok, thats great by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Well... I can answer the phone, respond to e-mail and IM even if I've just had my third shower, am still in bed or knee-deep in chaos or simply feeling too awful to face anyone in person. On the other hand, I often ignore the doorbell, unless of course I'm expecting somebody or know it's just the mailman or something. This might be different for people who're used to having friends come over, of course.

    30. Re:Ok, thats great by mandalayx · · Score: 1

      you're assuming that if I'm home, that I want to answer the phone, reply to IM's, etc.

      Sometimes that's just not the case...

      that's like assuming that if I'm in the office, then I must be reading my e-mail.

    31. Re:Ok, thats great by slickepott · · Score: 1
      Not if you want to contact me when I'm home. Ringing the door bell is the least likely way to get to me.

      I'd say IM is the most likely way and phone might work unless your number shows up as secret. We don't even check our dorr unless you call us first to tell us you'll come to visit us. :)

    32. Re:Ok, thats great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this... is where metamoderation is necessary. HAH. funny. LOL.

    33. Re:Ok, thats great by Jahf · · Score: 1

      All these "I don't answer the door" replies make me feel very happy I live in a small neighborhood where I don't mind visitors.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    34. Re:Ok, thats great by Insightfill · · Score: 3, Funny
      Recently had a coworker who told me about his experience in a parking lot.

      Seems a young woman was standing outstide her car and the remote on the keyfob (to unlock the doors) had run down its batteries. She just kept pushing the button, getting more and more frantic that she was locked out of the car. She considered even going to one of the stores at the lot and buying a battery, but didn't know what kind or how to do it.

      So my friend walks up, asks for her car keys, and sticks the key in the car door lock and turns the key.

      He said her expression was priceless.

    35. Re:Ok, thats great by Insightfill · · Score: 1
      I can relate. I work in cubeland, with no employee more than about 50ft from any other, but we LIVE by IM.

      Not as silly as this would seem. This works out to our advantage, as you can have private conversations without being overheard.

    36. Re:Ok, thats great by dublin · · Score: 1

      Because the telephone is useless. Nobody actually answers the phone any more. Ever try to conduct business by phone? It is absolutely impossible.

      Despite the current trendiness of e-mail and other more "modern" communications methods, there's no question that the phone is used to conduct *far* more real business than all computer-based methods combined.

      Phone calls are *the* preferred way of doing business by those actually *doing* business - making contacts, forging relationships, doing deals, signing contracts, etc.

      And, oh, by the way, when things get to that contract-signing point, e-mail still isn't used - another "old-style" electronic communications technology, called fax, gets the nod at that point - seems the courts have no problem with faxed signatures, but do not recognize fancy electronic cryptosigs.

      (BTW: E-week this week had an interesting article about more and more companies deemphasizing or even abandoning e-mail due to the cost and time lost to dealing with spam and virus epidemics. I think they're on to something - there's a very real backlash brewing against e-mail, IM, and their ilk, and phone and fax are the logical winners in that case.)

      In the 128 years since its invention, no one's written a virus that can infect my 1940's-vintage desk phone. It works flawlessly to talk to any other telephone in the world. It even fully supports *all* present and future spoken languages *without* re-flashing the firmware to install a service pack!

      You obviously don't like the phone, but in the real world, I'll take a phone over a computer any day - even to run a computer-oriented business like the one I actually do run! (Not to mention that laws against telemarketers are quite effective, while everyone realizes that such laws against spam cannot be enforced and so should not even be tried, as the FCC and FTC recently decided...)

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  5. Gr8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    do u no if u can d/l it?

    1. Re:Gr8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a ratio site. unlimited d/ls for ne1 who has "AIM etiquet" or "how 2 get laid."

      - a.c.

  6. Sure!! by Xshare · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'll be sure to use this with Stanaphone PC to Phone program or my VoIP. Doh!

  7. Communication communication everywhere... by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    but not a social life to speak of.

    Nice article there - it was to look over the pamphlet and retrospect about how far we've come communication-wise in the past few decades. We can communicate more effectively, work more productively, and get information faster.

    But I cannot say the same for the improvement in social life that technology has brought about. Sure, we have IM now, I can videoconference with my folks back home halfway across the world without paying a penny, but has it really *improved* my social life? I don't think so.

    IMHO, we communicate better with people we need to (at work) and family/friends, but we don't really end up making more friends (I won't go so far as to credit Orkut groups/etc as friends). If anything, we're spending more time in front of our screens sending and accessing messages (communicating) at the cost of social interaction.

    Maybe it's just me, but I have a feeling it's true for a lot of folks especially those around here.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was introverted *before* I ever touched a computer. The computer lets me socialize, learn new things, and earn money. If it wasn't for computers I would probably be wandering the streets or something. I would not be as able to accept myself as I do know. Something to think about, at least.

    2. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All these methods of communication only help you make new friends when the new friends wouldn't or couldn't make an effort to communicate in person. That sounds bad, but consider the case of stalking girls-normally they're afraid of creepy guys they don't know, and for good reason. If you stalk them online and get their IM names, you can get to know them in a non-threatening way, so they have their guard down when you meet them in person and kidnap them to add to your dungeon. That sure has improved my social life!

    3. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1
      If it wasn't for the tech, I probably still wouldn't have much of a social life. I have my share of friends, sure, but we all pretty much just hung out at each others places or went to the pool hall once a month or so. I met my girlfriend, love of my life, online and moved 1500 miles to be with her. I still keep in touch with my friends, we arrange to meet whenever I'm in town. I've met her friends and found out the boyfriend of one of them has a great blues band, and also I talk about 10x as much as I used to.

      So yeah.. I think all this tech has helped improve my social life, as well as allow me to keep better in touch with my old good friends without spending more money than I make.

    4. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by billimad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was introverted *before* I ever touched a computer

      welcome home buddy!!!

    5. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i completely agree with you, it's not a rare sight now to have 2 really hot girls walking down the street and they are not talking, they are both on their respective cellphones :/
      Before i could see a girl standing alone, and you could approach her and make some talk. Now? She's talking on her cellphone, maybe she will just turn away from you and keep talking because communicating with whoever is on the other side of the line is more important... sux

    6. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Moofie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The national level swing dancing scene is coordinate and enabled by Internet technology. A non-centralized group of enthusiasts organizes dances all over the US that are attended by hundreds of people.

      And if dancing with dozens of beautiful women I've never met before, and making friends all over the country, isn't a social activity? I don't know what is.

      So. The Internet is a tool. People use tools. Sometimes they use them wisely, sometimes unwisely. Why is this any different than any other innovation in history?

      You could argue that the advent of literacy means we don't sit around a fire telling each other stories anymore. I think that's equally silly.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      *** NEW PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT ***

      Feeling unappreciated? Don't know how to break the ice? Girl of your dreams too busy on the cell phone to even notice you exist?

      Enter ... the Nintendo JamBoy! This compact, handheld device will immediately eliminate all cell phone conversation within a fifty foot radius around you and your future mate. And forget about pagers, Blackberries and other distracting bits of anti-social technoclutter ... nothing will keep you from using your best lines!

      So don't be a wallflower. Just hit your handy-dandy pocket-sized JamBoy and baby, you're on. We'll guarantee you a clear channel to your potential sex partner, but the rest is up to YOU!

      (Not available in nations with Patriot Acts, eager-beaver law-enforcement and other killjoys.)

      $39.95 + $3.50 S&H (Requires 2 AA batteries, not included.)

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    8. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      but has it really *improved* my social life?
      It improved mine. I use the web and mailing lists to find out when my favorite local bands are playing in which bars. I used to not bother to go to bars because I usually didn't like the music, so I would get really bored. Now, since the trip is enjoyable, I go more often. And thus, I sometimes meet people. (And sometimes those people even have weird bumps on their chests.)

      When I didn't have the information, I just stayed home.

      If anything, we're spending more time in front of our screens sending and accessing messages (communicating) at the cost of social interaction.
      That's better than spending time in front of our screens playing Railroad Tycoon or trying to figure out why you're calling malloc() more than free().
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    9. Re:Communication communication everywhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did posting that comment make you feel better?

  8. Apparently the server admin isn't home by zoloto · · Score: 0, Redundant

    or we could phone him and let him know his server was on fire.

  9. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    this is slashdot, people here don't have friends, telephones are made for modems

    1. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this is slashdot, people here don't have friends

      Your friends.

    2. Re:Dude by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1
      "You are alone in the world."

      :^(

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    3. Re:Dude by shaitand · · Score: 1

      modems? eww nasty, talk about obsolete technology. Phone lines are for dsl.

    4. Re:Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      phone lines are for dsl AND a modem

      squeeze that last 1% of bandwidth out of the phone line!!!

  10. who uses a phone? by spacerodent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    prank calls are pretty much all I use a phone for nowdays. Anything important gets logged via email or some propritary messaging service the company gives out so theres no claiming you never saw/heard it or any ambigutiy in the wording. The only real use phones have is long distance talking to significant others where you want to try to get some personal touch in via voice but nowdays a webcam and voice over ip is the way to go. I don't even have long distance phone service at my house, for the few long distance calls I do make long distance I just use one of the 10-10+code series of deals.

  11. Social Engineering by fore1337 · · Score: 0

    The telephone has always been a useful tool to the tech savvy. Of course it helps to be nice on the telephone. Maybe you'd even get a date out of it?

    The Art of Deception: Controlling the Human Element of Security

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/04 71 237124/qid=1089485803/sr=8-1/ref=pd_ka_1/002-37092 70-9869657?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

    1. Re:Social Engineering by skaap · · Score: 1

      Once again.. you forget, this is slashdot, nobody here gets dates out of anything except a calendar!

      --
      -Rob
    2. Re:Social Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. I get dates out of a jar marked "premium dried dates", you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Social Engineering by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      nobody here gets dates out of anything except a calendar!

      Whatever happened to Slashdot/OSDN Personals?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  12. Someone... by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 1

    ...ought to write a guide to prank phone calls, updated and accurate for caller ID, etc.

    1. Re:Someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rule #1. Make your prank calls from a police station.

      2. ???

      3. Profit!

  13. Telephone? by sirGullible · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's a "telephone"? Is it like VoIP

    1. Re:Telephone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah it's totally just like VoIP on DSL. My grandpa used to talk about it.

      And apparently in those days they used to talk meet in person and make emoticons with their faces. Weird! I wonder if they turned their heads sideways.

    2. Re:Telephone? by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Close. But unlike VoIP, the quality is good, and you don't need your computer to be on.

      The best VoIP services, such as Vonage and that thing Time Warner is rolling out, are desinged to work like this older "POTS" system.

      You've probably encountered this system before you had a broadband connection. It's like DSL, but the technology is much more primitive.

    3. Re:Telephone? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      It's that minor, narrow-band analog signal that shares the wire with my DSL.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    4. Re:Telephone? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      What's a "telephone"? Is it like VoIP?

      And, what's a friend? Is that like a biological OS that does not blue-screen on ya?

  14. Phone skills are definitely declining... by vudufixit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aside from the prevalence of automated attendants, I've noticed that many human operators don't seem to know how to answer with a warm greeting, ask for information, put people on hold correctly, or bridge a call to the right person.
    I've become better at handling phones simply by listening to what these people are doing wrong, and using that as a basis for improving my own phone skills.
    But on the other end as a caller, I've found it helpful to announce myself at the beginning of the call, instead of having them ask me for my name. And also to have as much information ready as possible, and present it before I'm asked, IE account numbers, customer numbers, MAC address of cable modems, etc.

    1. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by vxvxvxvx · · Score: 5, Funny

      You dial the number, with all info in hand.

      *ring*
      *ring*
      *ring*

      [them] Hello?
      [you] Hi, I'm having some problems with my cable modem connection. My name is Papa Smurf, account number 1234567, and the mac address on my NIC is 00:00:00:00:00:00.
      [them] Uh, what? This is Joanne's Haircare?

    2. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      put people on hold correctly, or bridge a call to the right person.

      That part can be chalked up to phones that are too complicated to use. Sure I can route IP packets around like it's second nature, but phone systems don't make any sense.

    3. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by E_elven · · Score: 1

      Thank goodness my days at the call centers are over for now (doing gardening for the summer:).

      You are, however, completely incorrect in your kind advice: most call center operators in the financial sectors (banks, credit cards, insurance) are not really allowed to accept any information that you provide without prompting. This is done to prevent fraud and to ensure the operator will get correct data from the customer (it's hard to recall if the client said 3456 or 3546 when they've rattled off their SSN, mother's maiden name and address after that number).

      So yes, have the information ready, but only give it when requested.

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    4. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      Interesting...
      My experiences directly contravene what you say.
      I'm not saying you're wrong, but I've always been able to provide information before I'm asked. At the very least, it's a mark of efficency and courtesy to at least have the information ready at hand, instead of putting the phone down and fumbling for it.

    5. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by silvaran · · Score: 1

      But on the other end as a caller, I've found it helpful to announce myself at the beginning of the call, instead of having them ask me for my name.

      Yeeearrgh. This drives me crazy. When you receive a wrong number call and the person says, "Well who's this?" I automatically respond with "Who's calling please". I usually get this from disgruntled cell-phone users who are near the US/Canadian border and they dial a local call, and pick up a cell station in the other country. They tell me the number they dialed, then I tell them my area code, and they're much more pleasant after finding out the phone system is at fault.

      In any case, there are a lot of people out there who need to learn some phone etiquette.

    6. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it's that I don't know how to answer nicely, it's that I've almost been conditioned not to.

      At work I get calls all day - typically people bitching at me about computer problems all day which they usually make themselves. Then there is our crappy phone system which seems to route regular customers to me - the IT department which has nothing to do with our buisness that costomers would be directly involved. So now I have customers bitching at me about problems that I don't have any idea how to solve, and much of the time am not even sure who to direct the call to.

      So after a long days work I go home to a fun night of 1) wrong numbers where people just rudly hang up the fucking phone. 2) telemarketers who are simply abnoxious. Given all that, it's amazing I even bother picking up the damn phone at all anymore. I wonder how many other people have such crappy days as the result of phones and if that isn't starting to make itself felt.

    7. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Funny
      "I've noticed that many human operators don't seem to know how to answer with a warm greeting, ask for information, put people on hold correctly, or bridge a call to the right person."

      Perhaps they have different phone customs in India?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by LoadStar · · Score: 1

      I was thinking something along the same lines.

      I work at a college, supervising student workers on the IT Help Desk. I had thought that by college, people would've long since learned the proper way to use a telephone at a place of business. Boy, was I wrong. Every new batch of students that I get are as bad as the last.

      • "Hello?" NO! You do NOT answer a business line "Hello?"
      • "Hang on a sec." No... there's no "hang on" button on the telephone, and I know it's not going to be for "a sec." There's a hold button, perhaps you meant "Can I put you on hold a moment?"
      • (when the caller asks for a specific person) "Who are you??" I'm the guy calling for your boss. The question you want to ask is "May I tell him who is calling?"

      And so on. I'm tempted to make up a sheet just like this book, and making the help desk people memorize it before they're allowed to answer the telephone.

    9. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long is a moment ? Is it longer or shorter than a sec ?

      Neither of which are accurate measurements of time So your "Can I put you on hold a moment?" is just as flawed as "Hang on a sec." Personally I'd argue that 'sec' is more accurate as it's short for second.

    10. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Entropy248 · · Score: 1
      But on the other end as a caller, I've found it helpful to announce myself at the beginning of the call, instead of having them ask me for my name. And also to have as much information ready as possible, and present it before I'm asked, IE account numbers, customer numbers, MAC address of cable modems, etc.

      As an answerer, I hate you. Give me the information when I'm ready for it! I can't type/write/think any faster by you telling me shit I'm not listening to because I'm still trying to figure out how to spell vudufixit.
    11. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      I wish it was mandatory to dial the area code. I haven't dialed a 7 digit number (US, I have no clue about foreign numbering structure for phones) in years. Mandatory area code dialing would eliminate being interrupted by the idiots we both despise. :)

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    12. Re:Phone skills are definitely declining... by Merk · · Score: 1

      Bah, I disagree.

      I answer my phone at work "Hello?". I don't answer "Bob's Slaughterhouse, We Stab Em' for You, Merk Speaking, How may I direct your call." Why? I'm not a receptionist. My phone rings maybe once a week, and it's almost always someone within the company calling. "Hello?" is short and to the point, and lets them tell me why they're calling right away.

      Being told to "hang on a sec" and having the phone placed down while something is done is much more pleasant than being put on hold. I've often been abandoned while on hold, but I've *never* been abandoned while the phone was off the hook. And no, I'm not so stupid that I think there's a "hang on" button somewhere. When the phone is off the hook I can hear a little of what's going on, and I'm reassured that things are happening. Besides, there is no annoying musak when the handset is placed on the desk.

      Now, I agree that "who are you?" is a little rude, and would prefer (and use), "can I ask who's calling?" The other points though, I disagree.

  15. Is it polite by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Insightful
    to post some unsuspecting person's phone number on a well trafficked bulletin board and have 250,000 people try and call at the same time?

    Just wondering.

    1. Re:Is it polite by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Is it polite to post some unsuspecting person's phone number on a well trafficked bulletin board and have 250,000 people try and call at the same time?

      Judging from previous comments here at Slashdot, only if it's the number of a spammer or SCO executive.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a former eployer that screwed you over... 407-332-7400

    3. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You worked here?

      Brentwood Park Apartments - (407) 332-7400 - 242 Sharon Dr, Winter Park, FL 32789

    4. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fun with google.... actually its now Altamonte Park Apartments.... New name same shit hole...

    5. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's still impolite, just that it's also fun... Speaking of which:

      The SCO Group
      355 South 520 West
      Suite 100
      Lindon, Utah 84042 USA
      (801) 765-4999 phone
      (801) 765-1313 fax

      Contact SCO online
      http://www.thescogroup.com/company/feedbac k/index. html

      Darl C McBride
      1799 Vintage Oak Ln
      Salt Lake City, UT 84121-6539

      Darl's home phone #: (801) 424-2006
      Darl's office phone #: (801) 932-5820

      Email Darl: darl@sco.com

    6. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about these cunt ass landlords in California

      831 440 - 1984

    7. Re:Is it polite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      These motherfuckers in Hamilton, Ontario should be shot and pissed on. Corporate travel suites my ass.

      (905) 681-7355

  16. The only thing you need to know about telephones.. by jimhill · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I know a lot of Slashdotters are in school, so listen up and let Unc' Jim tell you something that you'll need to know in the real world, with, like, a job and stuff:

    When you are at work, in your office or cubicle or whatever, and the telephone rings, and you answer it...under NO circumstances is it appropriate for the first word out of your mouth to be "Hello?"

    Work is not home. Learn it. Live it. Love it.

    --
    Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
  17. Usefull for girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a geek with a girlfriend, I can say the phone is critical. While IM is usefull for large numbers of people, the phone is better for personal conversations where voice inflection has more meaning.

    And asking someone out on IM is just bad.

    1. Re:Usefull for girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lost it. I'm going to kill myself. Fuck you all.

    2. Re:Usefull for girls by jeffcox65 · · Score: 1

      > And asking someone out on IM is just bad.

      Yeah, but dumping someone on IM is worse.

      --
      Curb your dogma.
    3. Re:Usefull for girls by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      And asking someone out on IM is just bad.

      How so?
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
    4. Re:Usefull for girls by Powercntrl · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a geek with a girlfriend, I can say the phone is critical. While IM is usefull for large numbers of people, the phone is better for personal conversations where voice inflection has more meaning.

      And asking someone out on IM is just bad.


      I call bullshit. Not on the fact that you have a girlfriend, hey, anything is possible... It may not be as romantic as using the telephone, but I know a lot of people that have successfully arranged dates through IM.

      Here's a hint, it's not so much the medium you use as it is what you say. Sometimes people (especially us geeks) get so caught up in the technology behind the communications medium we forget what it's really for - exchanging thoughts and ideas.

      If you're not able to talk to a girl in real life, talking via IM isn't going to suddenly turn you into an Internet Don Juan. Likewise, if you know how to talk to the opposite sex, it doesn't matter whether you're speaking on the phone, corresponding through snail-mail or using IM. It's what you say that matters, not the means of conveying the information.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    5. Re:Usefull for girls by joseamuniz · · Score: 1

      I do agree with that. It doesn't matter where you say it but what you say. However, it cannot be forgotten that just the words we say are not 100% the message we want to transmit. Face expressions, tone and body language are some add-ons that give us more information about what the other is saying. That's why I think it is a bit harder to communicate using an IM than in real life. I'm not saying it can't be achieved, but it's more difficult and more prank-prone than other communication means. However hey... you've got the smileys :P ??|

    6. Re:Usefull for girls by gunnmjk · · Score: 0

      >> And asking someone out on IM is just bad.
      >Yeah, but dumping someone on IM is worse.

      How about text messaging? Bad or not, it's not like I'm gonna be talkin to THAT ho again!

    7. Re:Usefull for girls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Also, communicating with IM is ok as long as things are going well. If you are misunderstood and bad feelings or an argument develops, it is harder to make things right via IM rather than voice or especially in person.

    8. Re:Usefull for girls by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      It's easy to fuck up what you say, but you can't fuck up what you type as easily, as long as you check for typos. It's not that bad a way of asking people out. I've never really been good at talking to people, but I can just act normal on IM. For some people, it's easier to talk. For others, like me, who do a lot of thinking straight into the computer (programming, etc.), we communicate better through typing.

      And knowing people who have been dumped through SMS, even normal mail, even getting dumped over IM isn't as bad as it could be. I'd just rather do it all in person. But I don't, so meh.

  18. What makes you think... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Interesting
    By a fucking ad and support slashdot instead of posting it as a story please.

    What makes you think this isn't exactly what's going on? Story placement is a *big* part of any PR department's job...

    I learned my phone skills in the military. But telemarketers who ignore the do-not-call list have forced me into a corner. Now, I simply hang up on them rather than waste more than 10 seconds on trying to be polite. I feel for the person on the other end who is often just some low wage person trying to make a living, but that's not my problem.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:What makes you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I feel for the person on the other end who is often just some low wage person trying to make a living"

      That must be rough.

      It pays to have a heart of stone.

    2. Re:What makes you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just remember, the do not call list only forbids companies you haven't had a recent relationship with from calling you, and it can take up to 3 months to take effect anyway

    3. Re:What makes you think... by bfields · · Score: 1
      I learned my phone skills in the military. But telemarketers who ignore the do-not-call list have forced me into a corner. Now, I simply hang up on them rather than waste more than 10 seconds on trying to be polite.

      I just timed myself saying "I'm sorry, I'm not interested"; comes in at well under 2 seconds. You can add "could you add me to your no-call list?" (which in my experience actually seems worthwhile), and the ensuing "yes sir" and "thanks, bye" still shouldn't put you over 5 seconds.

      I figure there's a small chance that some day I'll misclassify a legit call as a telemarketing call, or just be unluckly enough to know someone in telemarketing and, while I'm certainly not going to give in (anyone who thinks manners requires them to listen to the whole schpiel is an idiot), if I can take a couple seconds and be minimally civilized than I figure it's worthwhile....

      --Bruce Fields

    4. Re:What makes you think... by "Zow" · · Score: 1
      I learned my phone skills in the military.

      I can think of some flip responses to that, but seriously, what does the military drill into your head about telephone courtisy that our mothers didn't try to?

      -"Zow"

    5. Re:What makes you think... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      You're not accounting for the no-pauses blast that the telemarketers start off with. It's always more than 10 seconds before they pause, and to cut them off is rude - ergo, it takes more than 10 seconds to be polite, even if you just say "I'm sorry, I'm not interested."

    6. Re:What makes you think... by bfields · · Score: 1
      You're not accounting for the no-pauses blast that the telemarketers start off with. It's always more than 10 seconds before they pause, and to cut them off is rude - ergo, it takes more than 10 seconds to be polite, even if you just say "I'm sorry, I'm not interested."

      Yeah, I always interrupt in that situation. But I don't think politness requires that you wait indefinitely for someone to shut up. A timely interruption to report some information of value to the caller (in this case, that they're wasting their breath...) is nothing Miss Manners would disapprove of.

    7. Re:What makes you think... by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

      True, and it's certainly less rude than just hanging up - and if you slip in the "Add me..." bit, it may prevent further callbacks.

    8. Re:What makes you think... by thynk · · Score: 1

      I can think of some flip responses to that, but seriously, what does the military drill into your head about telephone courtisy that our mothers didn't try to?

      When I was active duty (Army), we were required to answer the phone something along these lines

      "Alpha company, 1st division, 32nd Armor. Specialist Snuffy speaking, this line is unsecure. Can I help you sir or ma'm?"

      Mom only asked me to answer the phone that way a couple of times....

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    9. Re:What makes you think... by rhetoric · · Score: 1

      Having worked in several telemarketing positions: the BEST thing you can do is just hang up on them. It saves both people time and energy.

      --

      "where words meet intent, lies rhetoric's lament"
    10. Re:What makes you think... by Sazarac · · Score: 1
      As a developer of predictive dialing technologies, hanging up will actually get you called back quicker. In constructing a outbound calling campaign, I want to know if I've gotten the decision maker on the phone (called a right party connect or RPC), and I want them to make a decision. If the called party hangs up in queue or right after being passed to an agent, I'm going to try to call that number back as soon as possible in an attempt to get some sort of decision.

      Really, your best recourse is to get on the national DNC (Do Not Call) register, the new laws of last year have some serious teeth-- if a given company receives a lot of complaints the feds will come in and audit their calling list. This means that they bump the DNC list up against their list, and issue a fine for each instance of matching numbers found-- regardless of if they have been called or not. Too many instances can mean jail time for managers and dialer supervisors; and I have a sneaking suspicion that DNC abusers have to toss a lot more salads in the joint than child molesters.

      Also, attempting to waste the time of the calling agent backfires more often than not. These people have their performance measured on how fast they can handle calls, and how much of America they can reach out and piss off each shift-- a calling agent who is willing to sit on the phone while you pretend to look for your credit card for five hours will quickly be forced to find a new means of employment and be replaced with an agent that will just hang up on you and schedule a call-back. The analogy the sales managers used at the firm I used to develop for, was "the slot machine". The more times you pull the lever, then better your chances of winning, so close calls quickly or decide to come back later, rather than attempt to win customers over with a 30 minute heartfelt oration on the glories of your product.

      Personally, I got tired of the bad kharma, so I gave up working on outbound sales applications and I only do collections/recovery related dialer work now. So keep your payments up to date, and people like me won't find new and irritating ways to get you on the phone.

      --
      This sig is exempt from disclosure under the privacy Act of 1974.
  19. The one thing that really pisses me off by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People from other offices at work call and the first words out of their mouth are "Who is this?". I was taught that you identify yourself, then ask for person you want to talk to.

    1. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My boss once picked up the phone and yes the caller said "Who is this?", to which my boss replied with his name then said "who the f*** are you?"

    2. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by n4vu · · Score: 1

      There is no excuse for giving them a reason to ask. Following the protocol you yourself advocate, you give your name when you answer.

    3. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by MinorHeadWound · · Score: 0
      That's not really a very good people-boss, is he?

      I learned early in my career, if it was an internal call to say, "This is Rob" and if it was an external call to say, ", this is Rob. How can I help you?"

      OK so it's a tad smarmy, and as a developer I usually dropped the "How may I help you?" because it was usually either my friends, who laughed, or sales people, who took my friendliness as if it applied to them. :) But as a manager, that was pretty important, because you could get calls from anyone!

      And you wonder why every job description asks for "excellent communication skills".

    4. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by SirPrize · · Score: 1
      Vaguely related joke...

      The manager of a large office noticed a new man one day and told him to come into his office. 'What is your name?' was the first thing the manager asked the new guy.

      'John,' the new guy replied.

      The manager scowled, 'Look...I don't know what kind of a mamby-pamby place you worked at before, but I don't call anyone by their first name. It breeds familiarity and that leads to a breakdown in authority. I refer to my employees by their last name only...Smith, Jones, Baker ...that's all. I am to be referred to only as Mr. Robertson. Now that we got that straight, what is your last name?'

      The new guy sighed, 'Darling. My name is John Darling.'

      'Okay, John, the next thing I want to tell you is......'

    5. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by chgros · · Score: 1

      The protocol is, the caller identifies itself, then asks for the person it wants to speak with. (The callee just has to say "hullo"). In a business (or military) setting, the callee may identify itself at first.

    6. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by Murgatroyd · · Score: 1

      I always figured that the best answer to that opening question was "I give up - who are you?".

    7. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Or, "Well, let's see, whom did you call?"

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    8. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1

      The protocol I advocate is that the person who is calling, initiating the conversation, is the one who identify themselves first. I tell them the name of the business, so they know they have the right number.They don't need any more information than that until they identify themselves.

    9. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1

      It isn't so much the question, the office has common phone numbers. The big problems are that there is no greeting of any sort and that they don't identify themselves, I'm not asking for a huge amount of formality, just a greeting and a name.

    10. Re:The one thing that really pisses me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, who is *this*? You called me. You *do* remember that far back in time, right? And you *do* know your own name, right?"

  20. The hardest thing... by Bishop,+Martin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The hardest thing about a phone conversation is trying to figure out how to pronounce "pwn3d!"

    --
    Setec Astronomy
    1. Re:The hardest thing... by KanshuShintai · · Score: 1

      "Owned."

    2. Re:The hardest thing... by bruthasj · · Score: 1

      Pawn three dee?!

      That's my favorite killer move.

  21. Re:Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It all depends on the presence of modern technology. If there is an answering machine, you're not likely to get more than 5 rings before it comes in. If the target is a cell phone it's probably in the person's pocket and easy to reach. However, if it's a land line with no answering machine, the person you're calling could be on the other side of the house or in the bathroom. Give them 10 seconds to run desperately to the phone only to find you hung up just before they reached it, and they don't have caller id or *whatever to call you back, and you fail it at the telephone. Clearly the manual needs an update to take new technologies into account.

    I agree, whoever drew the retarded pencil steps is a dick. Who does that? PEOPLE WHO VIOLATE THE HANDBOOK ON HOW TO MAKE FRIENDS WITH USEFUL INFORMATION AND PENCILS THATS WHO!

    Additionally you fail it at the internet because you're supposed to load all the pages at once before reading them. That shouldn't take more than a minute on this site. You can even detect the patterns in the url and enter them manually if the site takes too long to load individual pages that have the next buttons. However it is agreed that they are, in fact, motherfuckers and their actions are "Nice going" in the sense of being totally gay. You should demand a refund. I bet none of the editors, not even Cowboyneal, could make friends on the telephone.

  22. What? by The+Meshback · · Score: 5, Funny

    So you're telling me I shouldn't answer the phone by saying:

    WTF do you want?

    1. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're telling me I shouldn't answer the phone by saying: WTF do you want?

      Wow you're a polite one! I usually pick up the phone, yell "the answer in NO!" and hang up.

      -hadohk

    2. Re:What? by heptapod · · Score: 1

      No, you should answer it nuq'neH

    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, great.

    4. Re:What? by IainMH · · Score: 1


      "So you're telling me I shouldn't answer the phone by saying:

      WTF do you want?"

      That could be construed as impolite, yes.

      Unless you live in NYC.

    5. Re:What? by syukton · · Score: 1

      if you're saying the letters "W", "T", and "F" then yes, I would say you shouldn't. It's pronounced "what the fuck" ;)

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    6. Re:What? by rthille · · Score: 1

      My brother who works for the Navy at Port Hueneme as a civilian contractor would answer the phone: "Pork-my-weanie, what can I do you for?" said really quickly. When the person on the other end would say, "What?" He'd repeat slowly, "Port Hueneme, what can I do for you?"

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  23. Telemarketing by October_30th · · Score: 1
    we've forgotten the correct way to communicate with people

    Someone tell the telemarketers that. It's very simple. Don't sound like you're a robot reading a script and if I say "No, I am not interested" that means that I am not interested in continuing the conversation with you.

    If I sound irritated, well, I am. For some reason the telemarketers started pestering me and this time they're calling me on my cell phone. Three calls already today. Four calls during the week and they just won't take no for an answer.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Telemarketing by effex100 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The correct way to respond to that is to tell them you do not want to receive anymore calls so could they please remove your number from their list. In most states they have to by law.

      --
      SMOKE... are ya smokin yet?
    2. Re:Telemarketing by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Don't say "I'm not interested". They called you and interrupted your life. That forfeits all rights to politeness. Just hang up on them. Cursing them out first is optional.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    3. Re:Telemarketing by CapeMonkey · · Score: 1

      They're not allowed to telemarket on cellphones because you pay for the airtime, IIRC... tell them they've called your cell phone, and they will usually apologize profusely and hang up, since they'll be in BIG trouble if you report them.

    4. Re:Telemarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may want to report this. Telemarketing calls to cell phones are illegal. I read the regulation on www.fcc.gov about a month ago, when someone posted a link to the actual law. I don't seem to be able to find it quickly right now though, finding stuff on the site is a hassle.

    5. Re:Telemarketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you shoot at the mailman?

    6. Re:Telemarketing by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      Yes, telemarketing to cell phones is explicitly illegal according to FCC regulations. I'll see if I can find the page on www.fcc.gov that states this again, their site is huge and hard to find stuff on.

    7. Re:Telemarketing by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Well, fortunately the incoming domestic calls don't cost me anything (I'm in Europe).

      The problem seems to be that where I live there is still no centralized do-not-call list. There is a no-call list which the telemarketers may choose to use, but in general they're free to ignore it.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    8. Re:Telemarketing by mbadolato · · Score: 1

      The correct way to respond to that is to tell them you do not want to receive anymore calls so could they please remove your number from their list.

      No, that allows for the loop hole of "we removed you from that list. This week we have a new list."

      You need to instruct them to put you on their Do Not Call list.

    9. Re:Telemarketing by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      No no no, you've got it all wrong. Your response should be *click*, or if you're feeling polite, Not interested. *click*.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    10. Re:Telemarketing by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1

      Cursing them out first is optional.

      Cursing is forbiden, the people who do this are just guys doing a job no one wants to do probably because they need the cash, and besides there is never a need to be rude to someone on the grounds they are putting themselves throught University, been made redundant or are generally just less fortunate than people who don't have to do this for a living.

      The people we have a problem with in these situations are the people at the top who are running/ have instigated this activity, find out who they are (what product or service they are selling) and then just don't bother to buy/use it or speak to a manager or anyone who actually has to take responsibilty for this i.e. it was their idea/decision.

      --
      If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
    11. Re:Telemarketing by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Nope. They knowingly took a job where they get paid for annoying people. That shows an utter lack of respect for everyone they call. If they have no respect for me, I sure as hell am not going to have any for them. If anything, cursing to show them what utter and complete assholes they are for takig such a job is the best thing to do.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  24. My thoughts by Twid · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, if you knew what the link was (which you won't from the terrible description) you would understand why it's slashdotted already. It's scans of an old telephone etiquette booklet. Graphics heavy, just begging to be slashdotted. Maybe we need a "slashdot story posting etiquette" booklet. :)

    Here's an archive.org snapshot of the first page:
    http://web.archive.org/web/20030602171945/http://c ontactsheet.org/junk/telephone1.html"

    I've been working with sales people for a long time, and I've learned a few things about voice mail etiquette:

    leave your name, phone number, and a very brief description of what you want FIRST, then go on to any details

    leave your return number SLOW ENOUGH THAT SOMEONE CAN WRITE IT DOWN. I can't tell you how many people actually SPEED UP TO AUCTION CALLER SPEEDS when leaving their number. If I have to play your number back five times to get it, I'm not going to bother. A good tip is to write your number down on scrap paper as you say it.

    if your name is hard to spell, SPELL IT. Or at least say it SLOWLY.

    Also, what's with people making phone calls from the public toilet? When I was at WWDC this year, I saw tons of people doing this, usually they were european. (No pun intended, but it's tempting.) Is this a cultural thing that I as an american don't understand? Seems to me the sound of background flushing would be a bit off-putting to a co-worker or potential customer.

    --
    - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
    1. Re:My thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You forgot the first rule of voice-mail etiquette:

      When the greeting says "you've reached individual's-name's voice-mail, please leave a message," do not, I repeat DO NOT leave a message asking for a taxi to come and pick you up or a pizza to be delivered to your house.

      -hadohk

    2. Re:My thoughts by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Look at her and tell me she doesn't look like she's up to mischief. Just from her face & that title I would have guessed it was a porn story about a lonely housewife.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:My thoughts by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Archive.org is blocked by the bank's web filter where I work. Can someone put up a mirror on another domain?

    4. Re:My thoughts by BrianB · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also, what's with people making phone calls from the public toilet? When I was at WWDC this year, I saw tons of people doing this, usually they were european. (No pun intended, but it's tempting.) Is this a cultural thing that I as an american don't understand? Seems to me the sound of background flushing would be a bit off-putting to a co-worker or potential customer.

      Shortly after we got wifi at my company, someone I know was in a bathroom, and there's a guy in the stall talking on the phone. The guy says "Let me send you that file...", there's the sound of typing and he says "there you should have it".

      The guy was actually connected to the network with his laptop from the bathroom!

    5. Re:My thoughts by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 1
      Shortly after we got wifi at my company, someone I know was in a bathroom, and there's a guy in the stall talking on the phone. The guy says "Let me send you that file...", there's the sound of typing and he says "there you should have it".

      I first read that like this:

      The guy says "Let me send you that file...", there's the sound of flushing and he says "there you should have it".

  25. These are trying times by annielaurie · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm using the phone more, not less. For example:

    1) Hey, I'm about to e-mail you three .JPG images and a Word Document. They're not pr0n, they're not viruses, and they're not malware from some cretin in China who wants to turn you into a zombie.

    2) Hi there. I need to fax you the final proposal. I'm not trying to get you to re-finance your mortgage.

    3) Did you, by chance, e-mail me three .JPG images and a Word document? I want to make sure they're not pr0n, viruses, or malware from some cretin in China who wants to turn me into a zombie.

    See? The telephone isn't obsolete at all.

    --
    DUCT TAPE: The Election Supervisors' Secret Weapon
    1. Re:These are trying times by strike2867 · · Score: 0

      4)Did you, by chance, get and open the three .JPG images and a Word document? I sent you to make sure they're not pr0n, viruses, or malware from some cretin in China who wants to turn me into a zombie.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  26. Interesting by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    People like to make fun of such things and "those wacky 50's ways." Sure, there were lots of civil rights issues and other ponderous bullshit, but some days I think we tossed out the baby with the bathwater. I mean, we really seem to live in a world these days that's an endless legion of assholes.

    If you so much as claim to like a TeeVee show someone else doen't like, that other person will tell you how your taste is all in your feet, your brain cells suffer from some degenerating disease of the mind, you should do disgusting and incetuous things with your mother and/or father and/or unlce, and you are, somehow, the moral equivalent of Hitler, Stalin and Caligula combined.

    Although not in so many words. It's usually "Yu fvkin suuk dood!" But the meaning is clearly implied.

    People tell me it's the result of free speech and free expression and the tossing of old ways, but that doesn't do much to mitigate the fact that we live immersed in an endless legion of assholes.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the failure of natural selection. Back in the old days, acting like that would get you stabbed to death. The good manners required to avoid stabbity death carried through to the beginning of modern times, but recently the endless legion of assholes has figured out they can act however they want without suffering serious injury. Unfortunately, if you stab someone for being rude, the police will fail to understand the situation, so the mechanism for improving society has been circumvented by the government.

  27. Slashdotted by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

    The site is totally slashdotted so I can't RTFA. Tell me someone, is it about telemarketeering as a career alternative to programming?

    --
    Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about how not to act like a dick while using the phone. It's really old, of course, since these days everybody's illiterate anyway and just goes off being a dick. Being a dick is required for a telemarketing job, so you're out of luck.

  28. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    Is that because of the punctuation?

    Is "Hello" okay? As a statement?

    What about "Hello, you've reached Freegeek, this is Matthew speaking, how may I help you today?"

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  29. Re:frist psot!% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I don't make friends with cowards.

  30. Boing Boing beat Slashdot by several weeks :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.boingboing.net/2004/05/27/1940s_telepho ne_manu.html Thursday, May 27, 2004 1940s telephone manual http://contactsheet.org/junk/telephone1.html

  31. With or without a modem? by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always replied to anyone who wanted to communicate over the telephone that I'm lost without a modem hooked up to the phone line. "You mean that's not just for hooking up a modem to?"

    In a related story, I forget what the program was -- something that you can pop AT commands to directly...but a long time ago, my sister refused to relinquish the line so I did ATA while she was on. Kept the beeeeeeeeep on long enough for her to hang up. And thus began the great phone wars.

    As far as real phone manners go, there should be a true syn-ack handshake for it. syn-> phone rings. "Hello, my name is..." terminating with the fin "um...I'm sorry, so in so does not live here anymore" [No Carrier]

    Anyone that doesn't follow the protocol shouldn't be allowed to communicate. :)

    1. Re:With or without a modem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "um...I'm sorry, so in so does not live here anymore"

      Advantage #14 of using a phone: nobody will notice your embarassing habit of misunderstanding common phrases.

      -hadohk

    2. Re:With or without a modem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I actually previewed, too! Oh well. Such is slashdot.

  32. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Funny
    When you are at work, in your office or cubicle or whatever, and the telephone rings, and you answer it...under NO circumstances is it appropriate for the first word out of your mouth to be "Hello?"

    No? How about just plain "WHAT!" or "FUCK YOU" and a nice healthy SLAM! Or "DUDE! I'm, like, in the MIDDLE of some serious SHIT. Call back." But not "Hello"? How about "Hi, how are you, I have gas"? I mean, a suggestion as to why "hello" is so bad, or some alternatives might be nice.

    Seriously, "Hello" followed by perhaps your name or department is JUST FINE.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  33. Using a telephone is like ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... smoking.

    You see it in '40/'50 movies a lot, but that doesn't mean it's in vogue today.

  34. How about some practice.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    407-332-4700 btw you want a four bedroom with a 2 car garage... and apartmentguide is where you got the info....

  35. Seinfeld obligatory quote! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmm friends? telephone? How can I give a HIGH-FIVE thru the telephone?!!

    Puddy: High-Five!

  36. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by October_30th · · Score: 1
    "DUDE! I'm, like, in the MIDDLE of some serious SHIT. Call back."

    "Hello! I'm on a four state killing spree! WATTA YA WANT?"

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  37. Re:who uses a phone? by HoldenCaulfield · · Score: 1

    This seems to address the professional aspect pretty well, but not really the personal.

    Granted, I'm 25 so using the cell to call my friends as we organize a trip to the bars or a round of golf is second nature. So, how do you handle these social things?

  38. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 5, Funny
    I worked in Germany for a while. I wasn't told that the convention there is to answer the phone and merely state your surname.

    First day, didn't know everybody's name. Phone rings, German geezer answers the phone and simply says "tits"!!

    Different phone rings, another geezer answers, says what sounded "fuck"!

    Me starts to think this is the Stuttgart office of the Tourette's society. Later learn that their names were "Titze" and "Foerch".

    Oh, how we laughed.

    Ha ha.

  39. Re:who uses a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still use the phone to call businesses. Family too. Anyone I can't reach through an IM network.

  40. For the next time by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Funny

    next time they call to sell you something, tell them you're out of town and won't be back till next week. See what they do with that.

    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:For the next time by cwspain · · Score: 1
      next time they call to sell you something, tell them you're out of town and won't be back till next week. See what they do with that.
      Before I was on the do-not-call list and got frequent calls from telephone companies, I would listen to their spiel and tell them that I would consider it if I ever got a phone.
      --
      He who reflects on another man`s want of breeding, shows he wants it as much himself --Julius Caesar, per Plutarch
  41. telemarketers by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 4, Funny

    A better approach is to let them go through their whole pitch, then say something like: "Hold on, let me get my credit card." Then put them on hold, and ignore them. If they think they've made a sale, they WILL NOT hang up, and will stay on the line for as long as it takes (a friend of mine claims he once strung one of them along for five hours.) And while they're waiting for you, they won't be able to harass other people. Of course, you have to be willing to give up a phone line for the duration of your little game.

    1. Re:telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, you shouldn't do that. Much of the time they are minimum wage workers, many of whom work on commission. You should ask to speak to the supervisor and string him/her along but leave the drones alone. You're depriving them of making a living with the false promise of a bit of cash.
      Havn't you ever wondered WHY they won't hang up?

    2. Re:telemarketers by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      You should ask to speak to the supervisor and string him/her along but leave the drones alone....

      Oh please. IT'S A WASTE OF TIME! HANG UP!

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they are retarded.

    4. Re:telemarketers by ramdac · · Score: 0

      Havn't you ever wondered WHY they won't hang up?
      It is because they are not allowed to hang up before the customer hangs up. That's usually a policy in callcenters.
    5. Re:telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, perhaps they should get into a line of work that is not disliked by most of the population. Or maybe, their companies should obey things like the national do-not-call list. Most people dislike telemarketers, hence why the DNC list was created. Personally, I say choke the telemarketers out from both ends, don't buy their prodcts and frustrate the workforce to get them to quit and take a job that isn't disliked by most people.

    6. Re:telemarketers by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 5, Informative

      That gives me an idea for an interesting use of VoIP/Asterisk: drop one of these guys into a fake extension that plays a continuous audio loop that sounds like a phone that's been sat down on the desk, with someone looking for their credit card, without tying up your phone or phone line so you can still receive calls.

      Step 1: get a VoIP account from someplace like VoicePulse or Nufone.

      If you use Inter-Asterisk Exchange to connect to their service ("IAX termination"), something interesting happens: even though you have only one inbound phone number, multiple calls into that number each get their own VoIP connection. So yes, 100 people could call you at the same time and saturate your Internet connection with VoIP traffic.

      This also means your provider doesn't handle call waiting or anything like that for you: you need to tell Asterisk how to handle multiple calls where your phone is already busy. You can be simple and just go straight to voicemail; you can do fancy stuff like transfer to a phone queue ("All representatives of the household are currently assisting other telemarketers. Please hold, and your call will be answered in the order it was received.") or to an IVR ("If this is an emergency, press 1 to have me paged." etc) or anything you want.

      Step 2: Record an audio loop of someone sitting the phone down and looking for their credit card.

      Set up your Asterisk box with a special-purpose extension for recording audio from your telephone. For example:

      exten => 732,1,Wait(1)
      exten => 732,2,Record(telemark:wav|0|0)
      exten => 732,3,Hangup

      Put that in a context that your inside telephone can access but outside callers calling in can't access, and then pick up your phone and call x732 ("REC"). You'll hear a beep -- then immediately set the phone down and play-act like you're looking for your credit card. Remember, you're going to be playing this audio in a loop, so if you say anything longer than a word or two, your target may figure out he's listening to the same thing over again.

      Phone reps will probably mute the phone so you can't hear them and then do something else while they wait. If you rattle the phone, or make noises that sound like maybe you're coming back to the phone, or maybe you just bumped the phone by accident, they'll have to pay a little more attention and can't tune you out completely while they wait.

      After you've got 20 or 30 minutes of audio on there, hang the phone up. Then go find the wav file in /var/lib/asterisk/sounds/ and open it in an audio editor, and trim out the beginning and end where you picked up and/or put down the phone.

      Step 3: Create a 'trap' extension to park telemarketers into.

      Again in a context you can access but outside callers can't, add an extension:

      exten => 3845,1,Playback(telemark)
      exten => 3845,2,Goto(1)

      Use Playback instead of Background because you don't want the system to react to button presses -- you don't want them dialing their way out of your trap and back onto your phone.

      Then, when you get a telemarketer call, string them along as per the parent post, and then just transfer the caller to extension 3845 (or whatever arbitrary extension number you pick) and hang up. Then your phone line is free, and the caller hears your recording in a continuous loop until they hang up.

      If it's legal in your area (one-party-consent state), you could even record the call while playing that loop. Just change that part of the dialplan to something like:

      exten => 3845,1,Monitor(wav,telemarketer-trap-recording)
      e xten => 3845,2,Playback(telemark)
      exten => 3845,3,Goto(2)

      and then if you're bored, load the files up in an audio editor and skip to the loudest sections, to see if you caught them saying anything interesting. :-)

      (I can't believe I just sat here and wrote all that. Yes, I'm at work, and I'm bored. :) )

      Have fun!

      --Michael Spencer

    7. Re:telemarketers by Bartgroks · · Score: 1

      Its rarely a policy. I just a quit a telemarketing gig. The policy was "Give the Prospect the opportunity to hang up first". Granted with the IQ of the average telemarketer it was interpeteted as you cant hang up until the prospect does.

    8. Re:telemarketers by IamGarageGuy+2 · · Score: 1

      Sick and twisted but it looks like it should work.

      --
      Stay tuned for new sig...
    9. Re:telemarketers by Xhad · · Score: 1
      frustrate the workforce to get them to quit and take a job that isn't disliked by most people.

      Oh please. If I didn't do it someone else would do it. Anyone who harasses me on a call is just kicking the tires because the engine won't start.

      Honestly, the people who like what they do are the ones who don't care anyway. Meanwhile, the people who actually take issue to being harassed are the ones who already don't want to be doing what they're doing.

  42. Re:who uses a phone? by spacerodent · · Score: 1

    instant messengers via wireless networks mostly though I will admit that cell phones have their uses in the social setting. They are also handy in emergencies. Most my friends cell phones do both as they're basically PDAs with voice capability. Since they're digital signals I'm not sure if you count that as VOIP or a "phone"

  43. Phone tip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've gotten myself in trouble more than once when looking at Internet porn while on the telephone... especially talking to girls.

    Tip #1: stay off the computer when on the phone

  44. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by mini+me · · Score: 1

    I hate places that don't answer the phone with something like "Hello". I typed in the phone number, so I already know where I'm calling. I don't need to wait five minutes for you to ramble off the name of your company or similar information I could care less about.

  45. Re:Lame. by Kronovohr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This idea's kind of an anachronism, but it held very true not 25 years ago.

    Ma Bell used to charge per phone in the house, so most households had only one phone and one phone line (the rest would disable the ringers on any newer phones so the CO would only see one phone).

    At any rate, when you were calling someone, they may have been at the other end of the house or even outside when you called, hence the one minute "rule", to give them time to get to the phone.

  46. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  47. How long can I hold up... by MasonMcD · · Score: 1

    mirror:

    http://masonmcd.homeip.net/telephone1.html

    My own TiBook on cable. Be gentle.

    1. Re:How long can I hold up... by kjd · · Score: 3, Funny

      My own TiBook on cable. Be gentle.

      I'll be sure to load the page as delicately and slowly as possible.

    2. Re:How long can I hold up... by acariquara · · Score: 1
      Be gentle.

      Famous last words...

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  48. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by mboverload · · Score: 0
    You can blow me.

    Hello, Did I get my grammar right there?

    Oops! Looks like I said "Hello" is guess it is inappropriate. Were is this shit youa re getting, I will say "Hello?", "What?" and "I'm busy" if I want.

  49. Telephone??? by concatenation · · Score: 3, Funny

    What next, "Sexy swirls: an introduction to smoke signals"?

    --
    "5... 4... 3.. 1... OFFBLAST!"
  50. Phones suck by igrp · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hmm, the article is still slashdotted.

    Anyway, I'm a little surprised this on /. As far as I am concerned, phones suck. I use them because I have to. It's a more "instant" form of communication than email provided you manage to get the person you need to speak to on the phone. And it's the standard, as most everyone has either a landline or a cellphone but many (well, let's make that 'some') people still don't have email accounts and/or don't check them regularly.

    That being said, I really dislike phones. As far as I am concerned, they're about the rudest form of communication, at least in a business environment. By chosing to make a call instead of emailing the person, you're chosing the easy way out. Basically you prioritize your time over their's. They have to talk to you even though they might be busy or doing something else. In a business environment, there are few people who can just ignore the phone.

    By emailing me instead, I could have dealt with your problem on my own terms and allocated time based on my current schedule (that the caller's certainly not aware of), needs and priorities. Should I not see your email in time (which is unlikely since my mail server notifies me of some new emails (procmail is great, isn't it) via text message) you could still call.

    That's why I have two cell phones. I use one during business hours, the number is on my business cards and if you call me on it during business hours I will answer, period. The other is my personal phone. It's small enough that I can easily take it everywhere, the number is not listed and only known to family, friends and customers who have expressed that they might need to reach me. Family and friends can call me anytime, no matter what. Same goes for customers, but they have to pay me (depends on the contract but usually I charge tripple) if they need me when I'm off. They're aware of that and don't bother me with trivial problems. If something important comes up, they know how to reach me though. Everybody's happy.

    So generally, I do prefer email or text messaging to phone calls. That way, I get to choose who I talk to. As far as I am concerned, it's a lot more polite to email me than to call me at 9 in the morning when I might still be asleep.

    1. Re:Phones suck by Twid · · Score: 1

      I think this is fine if it works for you, but most people I work with are *terrible* at returning e-mail in a timely manner. In fact, even people who in their voice mail say "e-mail is a better way to reach me" don't actually respond to e-mail very quickly in my experience. So, the phone is the only way to get a quick answer.

      Personally, I think e-mail is a pretty broken system. Many people receive far too many e-mails to process them in one day. Let's say you get 300 non-spam e-mails a day (this isn't uncommon in business). Let's say it takes an average of 30 seconds to do an initial read of the mail and decide whether you need to act or not. That's 9000 seconds, or over two hours a day just to sort your mail.

      Automatics rules and sorting help, but still those unread messages need to be reviewed sometime. Even mailing list messages and such need to be read, otherwise why are you subscribed? Most people I know just binge/purge their e-mail. (Internet Bulemia?) They let their mail pile up in their inbox until it gets unbearable, then they mass archive it and let the chips fall where they may. If someone *really* needs something, they'll just e-mail you again, right? :)

      Anyway, not offering solutions, just pointing out a problem. The only system I have seen that came anyway close to solving the problem was Lotus Notes back in the Notes 3.5 days. The way that Notes allowed everything to be kept in different stacks was something that I haven't seen in a messaging/collaboration system since. Even then, Notes was only good for the company network, not for sorting general internet messages.

      --
      - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
    2. Re:Phones suck by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Let's say you get 300 non-spam e-mails a day (this isn't uncommon in business).

      Only in a screwed up business. If those are actually requests that the person needs to deal with, I don't see how doing it via phone would be faster.

      I suspect what you might mean by 'spam' is 'spam, but not including the internal business related spam'.

      I'm willing to be educated otherwise though.

    3. Re:Phones suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      E-mail and text messaging take too much of my time. Please hand write all letters.

      That's the only true form of remote communication.

      Moran.

    4. Re:Phones suck by igrp · · Score: 1
      You raise some very interesting points.

      I have implemented a custom, mostly script-based system on my email server around '99 (heavily modifed since then) that I use to handle my incoming email. Since I have many not-so-technically-inclined friends and customers who might still use some broken, legacy MUA (often old Outlook versions; my pet peeve being eletronic greeting cards that almost all spam filters - for obvious reasons - classify as spam and that tend to be a real PITA if you miss them) my filters can't be too strict. Therefore I use a tweaked spamassassin setup that relies on both, whitelists and, in some cases, a very simple challenge/response system. I also have filters that notify me on my cell phone (the business phone) when new mail that matches certain criterias arrives. Additonally, my cell phones are reachable by email, too. Also, I have my IMAP account checked by software on my PDA (WiFi setup) semi-regularly. To complement this setup, I have a WAP gateway on one of my servers that I use occasionally to check my emails if I'm out in the countryside w/ no wireless coverage.

      This combination of somewhat-aggressive filtering and redundant notification works pretty well for me.

      As you eloquently point out though, this certainly isn't for everyone (especially since it required a fair amount of hacking when I set it up; there might be easier ways to accomplish what I'm doing these days but I'm sticking with the never-change-a-running-system rule ;)).

      Regarding the point you raise about organizing email in a database-style system, I'm looking forward to what the good folks at Google can come up with. I'll be keeping a close eye on GMail, especially with the recent Google Groups intregations stuff.

    5. Re:Phones suck by gilroy · · Score: 1
      Blockquoth the poster:

      The way that Notes allowed everything to be kept in different stacks was something that I haven't seen in a messaging/collaboration system since.

      I've never used Notes and don't know what the stack system was. But I've found that the Nelson Email Organizer has done wonders for my ability to keep up with incoming email and to search for old emails. It cross-links all messages and auto-sorts them by sender or other criteria.
    6. Re:Phones suck by Twid · · Score: 1

      heh, well then, a lot of business is screwed up. :)

      But yeah, I mean "internal or external e-mails that intentionally put you on the to: or cc: list" - your definition of "business spam" is a good one though. I think a lot of people are guilty of reckless cc'ing.

      --
      - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
  51. Liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's MY mac address.

    1. Re:Liar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the combination on my luggage!!!

  52. Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by mykepredko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article is slashdotted and I don't see a pointer to a mirror, but based on other people's comments, it sounds like it is a rehash of '50s rules and ettiquette and if it isn't how does it respond to questions like:

    1. If you have call display, is it polite to answer the phone with the caller's name? I couple of years ago, this freaked people out, now it's very common. Older people tend to think of this as an invasion of privacy; but these same people consider it acceptable to have a peephole on their door and only open it to people they know.

    2. What about call answer? Should you take the incoming call and how long should you be on it before returning to the original call? What happens if you consider the second call to be more important than the first?

    3. Is call screening using an answering machine polite?

    4. I give telemarketers one chance to hang up before I slam the receiver down on them. Is this polite or should I listen to their pitch? Can I blow a Fox-40 whistle into the receiver?

    5. What are cell phone rules? Is it acceptable to have a social call while in line at the supermarket? What about a heated business call?

    I suspect that a lot of these answers are based on how old you are and what your workplace experience is.

    Enquiring minds want to know!

    myke

    1. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by Frobnicator · · Score: 1
      Your questions aren't really answered by the 'article', other than the general guidelines like "be polite" and such.
      1. If you have call display, is it polite to answer the phone with the caller's name? I couple of years ago, this freaked people out, now it's very common. Older people tend to think of this as an invasion of privacy; but these same people consider it acceptable to have a peephole on their door and only open it to people they know.
      Just becuase you have caller ID or cubicle ID, doesn't mean you should assume that the name is the caller. The ID might say it's Joe, but in reality, it's your boss who is over at Joe's cube. Do you really want to answer the phone with "Joe, will you let me do some work?" In a business environment, its usually best to answer with "This is Bob" or "Bob Speaking", unless there is some policy for answering phones. If there is a company policy, follow it, even if you know who it is.
      2. What about call answer? Should you take the incoming call and how long should you be on it before returning to the original call? What happens if you consider the second call to be more important than the first?
      Personally, I think that an interruption should be no more than 30 seconds. Then tell one of them that it will be a while, and ask that person to call you back, or ask if they want to wait until you are done. Just ask yourself how you would feel on the other end. Anything more than a minute on hold feels like forever. At one place I worked, after two minutes on hold, calls were automagically routed to a bunch of general operations people, so that customer's knew they wouldn't be lost in the phone system.
      3. Is call screening using an answering machine polite?
      Some people refuse to leave messages, no matter what. Even if your machine says "I'm screening my calls, leave a message", they still won't leave a message. If you must use a machine, make it easy and obvious as to how to get a real person. (Note: menu mazes are NOT polite. Not in corporate environments (where they do screen out a lot of junk), and not on home machines that support them with "press 1 to leave a message for Bill, 2 for Jane, 3 for ..." .)
      4. I give telemarketers one chance to hang up before I slam the receiver down on them. Is this polite or should I listen to their pitch? Can I blow a Fox-40 whistle into the receiver?
      Um, no. Causing the caller to go deaf in one ear is not a good thing. Remember -- They could be an unemployed geek who took a telemarketing job to pay the rent: It could be you in six months. I think the 'correct' way to do it is to interrupt them immediately with "Please put me on your do not call list."
      5. What are cell phone rules? Is it acceptable to have a social call while in line at the supermarket? What about a heated business call?
      If you're from Europe, then heated business calls are best done in public restrooms. :) If they call you and you're the 24-hour on-call techie, then it's their own fault. If you decide to take or make calls when out in public, just remember, you're still out in public. Don't shout to your cell phone when others are nearby. Don't talk on it when it's dangerous, such as when driving or operating a wood shredder. Listening in on one-sided conversations is very boring, don't do it when there are other people who you SHOULD be talking to, unless they understand that the call is important.

      And finally...

      NEVER EVER stand in aisle 4 and call your sibling/spouse/parent who is on aisle 5 to ask "Did you want regular or diet?"

      frob

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      I just got out to Japan and I'm here for the next 7 months. I think any etiquette you read on cell phones is really country specific. For example, in the US, there are mixed feelings on the 2 way radio. I love it but a lot of people hate the thing. Unless someone is being rude about their conversation, usually we don't bother people on cell phones though. Japan is a completely different story. I picked up a cell phone when I got out here a few weeks back and everyone just kind of stared at me while I was talking on it. I come to find out in Japan is not polite to talk on a cell phone in a public place(It might have to do with how crowded Tokyo is) and if you do talk, you must cover your mouthso it muffles your voice(which is actually engenious because more sound takes picked up by the reciever and you can actually talk softer). As for telemarketers, I usually just say that I am not interested and hangup without giving them a chance. I don't want to be rude to them because I know people that have had to do that work, and it sucks. They really do hate bothering you, but for them, a sale really could mean eating ramen or eating something have decent. If I know who is calling, I will usually answer with the caller's name but I have had some wierdness happen with it(like when my dad calls me with my mom's cell phone) but today, I think everyone understands. But if it isn't a close friend or family and I know the caller I still answer and ask for their name. I don't think any loud discussions should be done in public, its really annoying for people around you. I usually try to keep the conversations to a minimum or when I get 2-wayed from a friend I just ask them to wait a bit unless its an emergency. Oh well, just for your reference I'm 20 and in college. cya

    3. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by bfields · · Score: 1
      4. I give telemarketers one chance to hang up before I slam the receiver down on them. Is this polite or should I listen to their pitch? Can I blow a Fox-40 whistle into the receiver?

      Obviously someone interrupting you in your home to sell you something is about as rude as it gets. But being polite to them doesn't mean you have to give in. You can always just start right away with "I'm sorry, I'm not interested" (bonus points for "would you please put me on your no-call list?" which actually seems to help). It's only minimally more effort than just hanging up. I figure there's a small (OK, probably very small) chance that I'll misclassify a real caller as a telemarketer some day and I'd rather they didn't find me totally uncivilized....

      And on the answering machine question, I know people that hate leaving messages, so I guess some allowances have to be made if, say, you have family in that group. But there's no way to both be polite and to be ready to drop everything (and possibly cut off whoever you're really talking to at the moment) anytime someone calls.

      --Bruce Fields

    4. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by cgenman · · Score: 1

      1. If you have call display, is it polite to answer the phone with the caller's name?

      It's never polite to point out that you know more than the other person might let on. If someone doesn't volunteer their name, they don't want you to know. If someone on slashdot pretends that they're not a virgin, just nod politely.

      2. What about call answer? Should you take the incoming call and how long should you be on it before returning to the original call?

      What happens when you're with someone in meatspace and another friend bumps in with something important? You should be on the line with the second caller just long enough to ascertain what is going on, and that you will call them back, but that's it. If it's a matter of life and death, call back the first person. So long as everyone behaves in phone space as they would in real life, nobody's toes will get stepped on.

      3. Is call screening using an answering machine polite?

      Only until people catch on. It is a bad idea, though, because once someone in the know calls and doesn't get you, they will think you are snubbing them. If you really must screen, get a caller ID box instead, and stay consistent enough that the people whom you wouldn't screen out never have someone pick up during a message.

      4. I give telemarketers one chance to hang up before I slam the receiver down on them. Is this polite or should I listen to their pitch?

      Telemarketers are people too. But so are drug dealers. Drug dealers at least make you want what they are pushing. I recommend simply telling them that they have reached a cell phone (which they are not allowed in the US to call), and the problem will dissapate. Beyond that, the telemarketers are really at the mercy of the people they are calling, who have every moral right to make life as annoying as they do when they call 50 times in the middle of dinner. There's no rule that says you must be polite to someone who refuses to be polite to you.

      5. What are cell phone rules? Is it acceptable to have a social call while in line at the supermarket? What about a heated business call?

      There are two parts to this. One, people mysteriously become very loud on cellphones. The physical distance seems to subconsciously serve to cause people to raise their voices perceptably. If someone were carrying on a normal conversation with the same volume that they carry on a cellular conversation it would also be annoying. If you're careful with your volume, you won't be annoying.

      Two, it is rude to be on a call when with someone else. It's ignoring your guest, even if youre just going to the supermarket together. The same rules apply here as apply to call waiting.

      Three, assuming you follow the above rules, it is not any more rude to be chatting quietly on a cell phone than it would be to chat quietly with a friend. If it wouldn't be OK to chat with your neighbor during a sermon, get off the phone.

    5. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by "Zow" · · Score: 1
      1. If you have call display, is it polite to answer the phone with the caller's name?

      As others have observed, it might not actually be them. I only do so with people that I'm expecting to call, such as someone I was just talking with who said, "I'll get right back to you on that," or someone I just left a message for.

      2. What about call answer?

      It's all a matter of priorities: customer trumps coworker, coworker trumps personal call (which I really hate getting at work anyway).

      3. Is call screening using an answering machine polite?

      No, because I hate calling friends and having to start, "Joe? Joe? Are you there? If you're there pick up? We were just going out to dinner and wanted to see if you could come along, but if you're not there, it's too late."

      4. I give telemarketers one chance to hang up before I slam the receiver down on them. Is this polite

      I think it's being too nice. Tell them to take you off their list, bonus points if you bother to stay on long enough to verify they understood, then hang up. They're never going to initiate the disconnect because as long as they have you on the line, regardless of what you say, you're a potential sale.

      5. What are cell phone rules? Is it acceptable to have a social call while in line at the supermarket?

      The main problem I have with cell phones in public places is people shouting, presumably because of the bad quality of cell phone signals. If you can carry on without being loud enough to disturb others, AND it doesn't slow you down in line (like because you're ignoring the checker or hands are tied up so you can't get your wallet), then fine, the brain tumor is your problem, not mine.

      What about a heated business call?

      No, again because of the shouting and the fact you're distracted. Tell them it's a bad time and deal with it later.

      I'm 27 and a computer scientist. All my professional experience has been in R&D environments with little customer interaction on the phone (more F2F), and it's usually easier to walk to talk to the other people on my team rather than look up their number.

      -"Zow"

    6. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by dtungsten · · Score: 1
      NEVER EVER stand in aisle 4 and call your sibling/spouse/parent who is on aisle 5 to ask "Did you want regular or diet?"

      Of course not, that's what walkie talkies are for! ;)

    7. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're never going to initiate the disconnect because as long as they have you on the line, regardless of what you say, you're a potential sale.

      "Put me on your do-not-call list. Hang up now. Whistle in 3... 2... 1..."

    8. Re:Some Questions on *new* Telephone Technology by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      What about call answer? Should you take the incoming call and how long should you be on it before returning to the original call? What happens if you consider the second call to be more important than the first?
      If you're referring to call waiting... I loathe that 'feature' - so much so that I do not have it on my own phone; and if I happen to be using a phone so cursed, it is ignored altogether.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  53. Make friends on the Telephone? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a better title for this book would be "Social Engineering for Dummies."

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  54. Manners, Shmanners by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 2, Informative
    Phone ettiquette my eye. Finally my bi-weekly reading of Miss Manners pays off.

    Check out this bit from the Duchess of Ettiquette that explains why the invention of the telephone is rude in and of itself.

  55. Re:Another oversensitive geek by xtermin8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think people were just more isolated, and ignorent of the legions of assholes out there. The 50's were also full of paranoia, too. Politicians like McCarthy fueled fears that Communists were plotting on every streetcorner to hijack America from within. It is only another extreme, that some remember, that the world was full of nice, polite people that would be friendly if only you could communicate with them! If the public had cell phones in the 50's they would run into the same attitudes.

  56. Cringe making TV advert by BillGodfrey · · Score: 2, Funny
    "If you're sat around at home, make new friends on the telephone. 0898 ... ..."

    The headline eerily reminded me of that one.

  57. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by balloonhead · · Score: 2, Funny
    I always say that first. Closely followed by other stuff, like my name or where I'm answering from (in a hospital, usually something like "hello, Ward 103, can I help you?" or some such thing.

    I never tell them who I am at work though. No-one would ever ask for me by name so it avoids them taking the opportunity to quiz me on the health of their relative and instead I can just pass the call on to someone else.

    I have also mastered complete ignorance of the noise of the phone, so I can usually out-wait anyone within hearing distance so they answer it first.

    --
    This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  58. mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is he redundant? only one comment previous to this was mentioned about it!

  59. asking a girl out over IM ?? by zoloto · · Score: 1

    you have to be kidding, right? You really WANT to know WHY it's bad to ask a woman out over the instant messenger?

    Wow, you still live in your moms basement don't you? Holy shazbot!

    1. Re:asking a girl out over IM ?? by Firefly1 · · Score: 1
      you have to be kidding, right? You really WANT to know WHY it's bad to ask a woman out over the instant messenger?
      I will answer your questions truthfully, and in order: no; yes.
      --
      - White Knight of the Order of Mihoshi Enthusiasts
  60. A more recent technology etiquette book by jesser · · Score: 3, Funny
    Can I Fax a Thank-You Note? (1998) covers phones, cell phones, beepers, fax machines, e-mail, IRC, and usenet. It is both funny and full of useful advice.

    Excerpt:

    Everyone deserves a greeting

    Have you noticed how impolite people are on the phone? You sweetly answer your phone: "Hello?" You're greeted with "Yeah. Let me talk to Billy," or "Uh, I was callin' about the tickets," or "Is Sherry there?"

    The person answering your phone call at the very least deserves a hello. If you are acquainted with the person answering the phone -- even if you just know his name or have only spoken with him on the phone -- you should try to greet him with a sentence. This is equally important in social and business situations. Say you're calling your friend Liz and her husband, George, answers the phone. Depending on how close you are with George, you may say, "Hi, George, it's (your name). How are you?" or something like that. It is rude simply to say, "Hi George, it's (your name), can I speak to Liz?" George desrves a polite social interchange.


    Another excerpt:

    No one ever wants to hear your beeper. Beeping mode should not exist. In fact, the only reason it does exist is so that we don't have to call them vibrators.
    --
    The shareholder is always right.
    1. Re:A more recent technology etiquette book by bob65 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Depending on how close you are with George, you may say, "Hi, George, it's (your name). How are you?" or something like that. It is rude simply to say, "Hi George, it's (your name), can I speak to Liz?" George desrves a polite social interchange.

      Actually, if I were George, I would find the caller to be exceedingly irritating and annoying, if the "polite social interchange" has no point other than to take up time. The fact is , the caller called wih the intent of speaking to someone else, and simply greeting me with a "Hi George", and then politely asking for that person is perfectly fine (and preferrable) for me.

    2. Re:A more recent technology etiquette book by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      I agree. I'd say the maximally polite exchange is something like

      "Hello?"

      "Hi George, it's Paul"

      "Hi Paul"

      "Is Liz about?"

  61. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by bob65 · · Score: 1

    Um, so what IS an appropriate first word, besides "Hello" ("Hello?" is not a word, so I'll assume you meant "Hello" - normally I'm not so anal, but since you made a point of being specific about the first word, well...)?

  62. Learn to spell. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1, Troll

    Internet is a proper noun and must be capitalized. It's the Internet, not an internet when talking about the Internet.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:Learn to spell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INTERNET!!!!!

    2. Re:Learn to spell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!

  63. Stop whining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to Slashdot, not "Tea at Mrs. Nessbit's". It only takes one previous comment to qualify as redundant. Don't take it so personally.

  64. how about "FUCK OFF" by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I am trying to get work done you bloody idiot and you just broke my concentration.

    Seriously any company that allows programmers and such to answer calls directly from the outside (no secretary or such in between) is wasting resources. It may look like I have time to answer the phone but in reality I am thinking (or sleeping) and being distracted means that I am not only going to have to waste time getting my thoughts on track (or falling asleep again) but you are also allowing your customers to be handled by people whose skills probably are not in communication.

    So I would instead teach a different lesson. If the person answering the phone isn't any good at it, don't let them answer the phone.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:how about "FUCK OFF" by welsh+git · · Score: 1

      > Seriously any company that allows programmers and such to answer calls directly from
      > the outside (no secretary or such in between) is wasting resources. It may look like
      > I have time to answer the phone but in reality I am thinking (or sleeping) and being
      > distracted means that I am not only going to have to waste time getting my thoughts
      > on track

      Here here.
      Where I used to work, they actually hired someone to take the phone calls for this
      very reason.. Then after a while, he left, and they said they couldn't afford to replace
      him.

      The amount of times you'd lose concentration because the phone was ringing... I would
      often leave the phone off the hook, or simply switch the ringer off, but I was told not
      to do that!

      Ah well, their loss!

      --
      Sig out of date
    2. Re:how about "FUCK OFF" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could acquire some social skills instead of whining that someone is interrupting your sleeping at work, jackass.

    3. Re:how about "FUCK OFF" by cpghost · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's your username again?

      *mumble*

      >clickety click...< Now you have plenty of free disk space.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:how about "FUCK OFF" by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 1

      "Go the fuck away! I am working on some bad-ass computer shit right now! I have no time for Team Spirit!"

  65. Re:who uses a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who uses a phone? Anyone involved in business and anyone with real friends. A webcam + voice over ip is a phone.

  66. Re:who uses a phone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    So, how do you handle these social things?

    By not having any friends.

  67. Phone vs Txt by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Its interesting, I'm a big geek, yet I don't have a cellphone, and only borrow my brothers when necessary. I hate using phones of any sort because its simply more convenient for me to IM someone.

    Of course, this is when I have a computer handy, and I'm not saying cellphones aren't useful for the road. But even then, I find it more convenient to text someone. Why? Simply because, when using text, via computer or cell, it doesn't require your immediate attention. When I'm on a computer, I can alt-tab and focus on other things, like webpages, games, pr0n, etc. With txtmessaging on cells, you can do the same thing, leave the msg in your inbox and view it later. Of course, there are times and places where audio data is better than visual data, but I still find I have a preference for texts.

    And I'm not saying this because I have an aversion to people, I simply prefer to use text via IMs or cellphones or face to face, I hate the phone.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  68. One good rule - know to whom you are speaking! by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One good rule I wish people would follow is simply to know to whom you are speaking before you continue.

    We have Direct Inward Dial at work - this means that in addtion to being able to dial the main number, then at the prompt enter an extension, it is also possible to dial a different number and get an extension directly - so if my extension was 123, you could dial ###-#123 where the #'s are a fixed prefix.

    Now, for the sales guys this is great, but for me it sucks, since I generally don't need to talk to anybody directly, and I'd rather they have to dial the main number and my extension if they want to reach me - I have systems to design, code to write and debug, work to do!

    So, when I answer the phone directly, it is simply "Engineering, this is (name)". If you really are trying to reach me, you will know you have the right number and can continue. Hopefully, if this is the WRONG number, you will clue into that and check - "Excuse me, but I was trying to read Edith's Toenail service, do I have the correct number?"

    Thursday the phone rigs the "outside line" ring, and I answer it - I am having a bunch of work done on my house and it might have been one of the contractors. I give my usual answer, "Engineering, this is (name)".

    And this gal starts in - "This is (name) and my son is (name) and he had his thing stolen at school and " and so on for a good 15 seconds at a mile a minute before I get a chance to break in. "Excuse me miss, but you have the wrong number." "This isn't XYZ school?" "No ma'am" "What number is this" (Now, I happen to feel this is improper ettiquette - IMHO she should have said "Is this ###-####" - she does not need to know what number this is, only if this is the number she was trying to dial) "No ma'am, this is %%%-%%%%" (the main number, not my D.I.D. number) "Oh, I have the wrong number (click)".

    Beat.
    Beat.
    Ra-Ring.
    (sigh)
    "(Full company name) this is (name) can I help you?" "I have the wrong number again - is this ^^^-^^^^" "No, ma'am, this is ^^^-^^**" (Last 2 digits wrong) "Oh, I'm sorry (click)"

    Now, the point of this story is that, upon first hearing something that was NOT "XYZ school", she SHOULD have said, "Excuse me, but I am trying to reach XYZ school, do I have the right number?" rather than launching into her life's story.

    I'm sure she was upset by whatever was happening in her life, but she told me things that not only did I not CARE to hear, but were pretty damn personal - all because she did not confirm the identity of the person with whom she was speaking.

    Of course, we live in a society that will blindly fill in whatever forms J.Random.URL asks - I should expect no different for the telephone.

    1. Re:One good rule - know to whom you are speaking! by yowi · · Score: 1
      When they DO actualy listen to my greeting and establish that they dialed the wrong number,

      I quickly throw in " That's ok. The phone was ringing anyway."

      9 out of 10 will respond with "Oh good" or something similar before hanging up.

      --
      Why don't the headlines ever read 'Psychic wins lottery'
  69. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't consider it an error detection mechanism?

    I suppose you customize your router to avoid doing CRC?

  70. Politeness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It's one thing to IM and ask "can you give me a ride". It's quite another to appear at the doorstep asking it; that's putting the host really on the spot.

    I'm not surprised that your friend was female; they do tend to have a lot more tact than males...

    1. Re:Politeness. by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I hate tactfulness. With a passion.

      I'm not tiptoeing around, worrying about offending people. I'd just turn up on the spot and ask. If you can't say no when you want to, then that's your problem.

  71. maybe something more relevant... by sevinkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    we know how to use devices, how about teaching us how to communicate in person, and have the other person believe we're not weird without putting up a front.

    maybe that's an oxymoron?

    1. Re:maybe something more relevant... by uptownguy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Baby, someone's gotta moderate this comment to the moon! You know it's true!!!

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    2. Re:maybe something more relevant... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oddly enough, the answer seems to be in that book. The book does an excellent job setting standards & explaining why they are in place. It explains the incentives behind each standard. It also doesn't assume that the person is familiar with the technology. It has illustrations. It has clear titles for memorizing concepts.

      Contrast that with man pages. Do the man pages explain why you would want to use them? What about info pages? What about HowTos? Obviously, these documents were written to a different market, & thus it is comparing apples to oranges. However, there is wisdom in comparing them anyways.

      When that girl asks you how you are doing, do understand why she is asking? What about if she brings up a topic? What if she mentions something about your shirt? Would you know what to say? I'm not an expert, so I'm not even going to attempt to explain that which I don't know. However, it is safe to say that there is a rhythm in the conversation that needs to be followed. If you want to change the subject, then there needs to be a relatively specific way of doing that.

      I encourage everybody to go back & read that book, but this time think in terms of what the other person needs & wants when you talk on the phone. Try to identify those needs & wants, & see if there are any needs or wants which are common to face-to-face conversations. Then go ahead & try to meet those needs. Think of phrases & sentences as tools for meeting needs & fixing miscommunications.

      Like I said, I'm not an expert. I've never even had a girl friend in my entire life. I've never dated very much either.

    3. Re:maybe something more relevant... by Erwin-42 · · Score: 1
      This is somewhat tangential, but I've recently read a a book which you might enjoy:

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345 447557

      "Speed of Dark", by Elizabeth Moon is a near-future novel about a entirely autistic person, but I recognize many of his traits in me and other geeks (such as trying to "understand" this silly smalltalk (not Smalltalk), trying to understand *everything*).

    4. Re:maybe something more relevant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heheh -- I'm sitting at (-1) Redundant because someone took the time to give me a (-1) for my little spurt of cheerleading there. This, even though the grandparent post had been sitting at Score:1 for 5 hours with no one moderating the post at all. That's why I posted.

      Heheh...(shakes head) Oh well... the post is now at +5 and all the lazy and socially inept Slashdotters will now get to read it. Karma be damned... I did a good thing here... ;)

    5. Re:maybe something more relevant... by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Oh, no. Are you trying to tell me that I'm trying to understand too much? I ask because I thought that we weren't trying to understand enough about small talk.

    6. Re:maybe something more relevant... by sevinkey · · Score: 1

      nah dating won't help you be an expert. I'm married and still don't get it. :)

  72. RE: knocking on the door by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Yeah - you know, I've experienced the same thing a few times, and to be honest, it's totally contradictory to the way I do things myself. I've always felt like anyone who takes the time to physically show up at my door for social reasons is making the "ultimate effort" to spend some time with me.

    If I'm on the phone when someone unexpectedly drops in, I give the visitor preference over my phone call. Only if I already have other company over do I have to give things more thought - and then I try my best to split my time between the visitors, if possible.

    But I've had friends in the past who practically slammed the door in my face when I dropped by, telling me basically "What the h*ll is your problem? Call me before you just show up here!" Quite frankly, those people quickly lost rank in my list of people I considered friends.

    If I did drop by someone's house without calling, it's probably either A) because I was in the area anyway, and it just made sense, or B) because I had an emergency of some sort. I'm not too dense to take a hint and leave quickly if it's obvious I'm interrupting something important - but I at least expect people to be gracious/polite about it.

  73. Phoning protocol by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

    Question on the phone:
    "heyyyyy, whatch doin?" translation: "I wanna fuck, you free now?"

    Answer A:
    "nuthin" translation: "yea, get your ass over here."

    Answer B:
    "I call you later okay?" translation, I wanna fuck you, but I'm fucking someone else right now...

    Answer C:
    "Oh, it's you." Translation: "No"

    Answer D:
    "Ahahah! You're so funny." translation: I'd love to fuck, just not you...

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  74. Smoke Test by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    Don't worry.

    The webmaster will find out when his mom asks him about the smoke pouring out from his bedroom closet.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  75. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Huogo · · Score: 1

    Where I work, there is no phone policy, but we usually answer something like this: Good (morning|afternoon), , how may I help you Or sometimes , , how may I help you Our receptionist answers with nothing more than .

  76. Ford Motor Co. by metalligoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the Detroit area, one of the suburban area codes (248-xxx-xxxx) is 248.

    At Ford headquarters, one of the local city exchanges is 248. (xxx-248-xxxx).

    Whenever anyone from downtown Detroit tries to call someone from the suburbs with a 248 area code, and doesn't dial a "1" to indicate a long distance call, they get some unhappy engineer at Ford.

    It usually goes something like this:

    *ring* Ford employee notices local number on Caller ID they don't recognize...

    "Ford Motor Co. this is xxxx"

    *In very strong urban accent* "Is Tiniqua there?"

    "Excuse me? This is For-"

    "If you don't put Tiniqua on the phone, some shit is goin' down. Who the f*** are you, cracka?"

    "This isn't who you tried to dial. This is For-"

    "WHAT? You sayin' I stu-pid too? I can't dial no phone? I don't think so. That's it! I'm comin' down there to find out where tha hell she is!"

    *click* *sigh*

    *true story*

    1. Re:Ford Motor Co. by metalligoth · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, race has nothing to do with how people act in the inner city. People with the "urban" mindset are black, white, hispanic, asian, etc.

      Maybe it is you that should be shipped to Africa?

  77. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by bob65 · · Score: 1

    That sounds a bit more like a greeting for those who actually expect to help someone when they answer the phone. I'm not sure if it makes sense for most people.

  78. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by aonifer · · Score: 1

    Depending on the mood, it's either, "Give me the love, baby!" or, "Stifling black hole sucking the joy out of life, how may I help you?"

  79. Over 7 years ago... by Andy_R · · Score: 4, Funny

    assuming there is a 7 year statute of limitations... I had in my office a mysterious phone socket, which didn't seem to generate a telelphone bill. This was long before caller id, so I had no way of finding out the number, so I used that one for outgoing calls and my own for incoming.

    A side effect of this is that every incoming call on the mystery line was a wrong number. Following my high standards of telephone etiquette, I started off politely greeting callers with "Hello, this is the wrong number.", which (despite being factual, formal, polite and clear english) seemed to baffle the vast majority of callers.

    Responses varied from polite confusion, through stubborn insistence that I must either BE the person the other party wanted to speak to or at least able but unwilling to put me though to them, all the way to someone who called 10 times in as many minutes asking for "Dave", getting more annoyed each time. On the 10th call I said "OK, you win this is Dave, what do you want?", at which point he hung up on me.

    After a while I got bored with politeness and switched to making prank answers (like prank calls, but the other way round), the objective of which was to keep a straight face while cracking everyone else in the office up. The most successful of these was 'dial-a-duck', the premium rate porn service for duck fetishists, which involved answering the phone with "Hi, welcome to Dial-a-Duck", and then carring on the resulting conversation using only the word "quack", in as seductive a manner as possible.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Over 7 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We had something similar - the phone was set up for diagnostics on a server, so inbound calls were always the wrong number.

      Our most successful prank answer was 'C.I.A.' - the usual response was to hang up very quickly ...

    2. Re:Over 7 years ago... by Otto · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had in my office a mysterious phone socket, which didn't seem to generate a telelphone bill. This was long before caller id, so I had no way of finding out the number, so I used that one for outgoing calls and my own for incoming.

      A side effect of this is that every incoming call on the mystery line was a wrong number.


      I had a similar situation in my fraternity in college... We had a payphone that had no ringer or coin slot.. it would only take credit card calls. I found the number to it by dialing the local ANI code (how I figured that out is a whole other story), but I also worked out where the wire went and connected up the light in the "booth" to the line such that it would blink when someone called it. The main reason for doing this was so that we could get calls on that line. Easy hack. I didn't want to put in a ringer because the phone guy would get ticked at us about it, but he never noticed the blinking light. :)

      In any case, I found out that we got a lot of wrong numbers on that line because somebody else knew the number as one that was "never answered" and gave it away to people all the time, appearantly. There was some girl that was appearantly using it to give to guys in bars and clubs and such. You invent your own way to mess with these guys heads, we probably used them all for that one. :D

      In another case, after we rewired the building to have individual lines to the rooms, I was living in another building that had an interesting property on its phone number.. The number for the courthouse was something like 341-2345, which the number to our line was 364-1234, and both "341" and "364" were normal prefixes for that area. Meaning that if you dialed the number without thinking too much, you could dial the wrong prefix, but continue the number and get us instead.. Like if you dialed 364-12345. The upshot is that we got a lot of wrong numbers for people wanting to know how much the fine for their speeding tickets was. I mean a *lot* of wrong numbers, like at least 3 or 4 a week. Eventually, me and the other people in that building started giving out amounts of the fines and addresses to send the tickets to. Just random ones at first, then we'd tell them addresses of our friends, or the post office, or various buildings on the campus. Lots of fun. Gave the people grief about speeding and such.. Tell them that there was no fine, they'd have to go to jail for a weekend, just crazy stuff we thought up. It was all probably illegal though, as we were impersonating police officers. ;)

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  80. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by jimhill · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, putting the question mark after the word indicates that it's to be spoken with rising inflection, as opposed to the blandness of "Hello."

    That said, the appropriate thing to say depends on where you work. On a shop floor, for example, you might opt for "Shop floor, this is Joe." In a technical office kind of environment, quickly state your organization and name, e.g., "Mergers and acquisitions, Floyd Smith." Perhaps your name is irrelevant, so you go with "Elton Electricians, how can I help you?" If you're your own boss, the name alone can suffice: "Jeff Smith."

    The key thing is to answer the phone with a brief greeting that immediately lets the caller know if he's reached the place/person he was after. "Hello" with or without question mark fails to do so.

    --
    Learn to spell: nickel, missile, lose, solely, amendment, speech, kernel, probably, ridiculous, deity, hierarchy, versus
  81. I don't care about phone ettiquette!!! by Tolvor · · Score: 1

    Why in the blazes would I want to learn the proper etiquette to use on the blasted phone?!? I have idiots (yes, I call them idiots intentionally) who seem to regard my phone as a tool for *their* convience, not mine. They will call up and fall into one of five catagories - advice (I don't give free advice, I do give free bad advice though. Will that do?), me to buy something (If I find you you'll regret it), my opinion on your ##@%!^# survey (and why should I give a #!#% about your survey), or relatives (most of whom have learned not to call me at work, ever), customers (I don't want your life story, nor how it happened, nor your pathetic excuse of why it isn't your fault, nor your amusing fallible logic of what you want me to do about it, nor endless whining. I want the problem in 10 words or less. Most problems can be stated in this many words. If I need clarification I will ask further questions. Don't think, just follow my directions. I can probably fix your problem. Fear me, because I do hate and despise you Mr Customer, and I have enough authority to assure that if you tick me off then your little problem with get worse, and will never get fixed.), and superior-powers-that-be (my boss, government officials, landlord, police (gosh officer, I really can't remember anything about that customer, and I have no idea how he got a Gizmo3000 shoved up one nostril.) - with superiors my goal is to figure out how to satisfy their question as quickly as possible, and to endure whatever they need to talk about.).

    Why do I feel this way? Because everyone treats the phone as their little toy. They feel nothing about picking up the phone and calling. Let's face it. These are the 2000s people. We are busy . Everyone who cared enough about every customer and every problem, and the 100% satisfaction do-bee employee found their productivity numbers falling in the 90s and got laid off. The only people who are left are the result-oriented grumps. Don't be mistaken if you see us smiling, or smiles in our voices. Grumps are very good at smiling (mussssst not sssscare the preciousssss potential cusssstomerssssss, my precioussssss). Most people think nothing about picking up the phone and calling me for a tiny problem. The customer doesn't realize that I'm usually already working on some problem on a computer, typing up your problem, speaking to you, and working on odd bits of paperwork that's in my in-bin. There are four customers on hold in the phone queue trying to get hold of me. Do you really expect me to hand hold you through why your wireless lan laptop doesn't work when you drive away from your home wireless router??

    Proper communication nowdays is email. Email is lovely. I can ignore the unworthy email. I can usually handle an question related email a lot faster than any phone conversation. Another plus is that it is hard to whine, wheedle, and squeeze goodies via email (Can't you just sort of, um, extend, that warrenty a little). Best of all, email is semi-permanent. It can be forwarded, bcc'ed, and used for evidence that you are a lying, cheating little turnip.

    Go ahead, mod me insensitive.

    1. Re:I don't care about phone ettiquette!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, my! I Bastard sense timgeling....

      I must surmise byt the above post that you are, in fact....a Bastard! Please note the capitol B. I can just imagine yu asking one of your customers "and what might your username be? There now. That solves your little problem. Now you have LOTS of room in your home directory..."


      The Anonymous Bastard

  82. So then tell me by devphil · · Score: 1


    how our group of developers is supposed to have a meeting with our customer's group of developers? I'm ginuinely curious how you would do this, since apparently you don't need to.

    Email? Not real time, and not responsive, and everybody trying to "talk" at once. There are times when a linear flow of information is best, not the fractal branching of subthreads that's almost inevitable in large email conversations.

    Text messaging? Yah, whatever. Like email, only with typos because everybody's trying to type in a hurry, and single-sentence lag because the other person isn't done talking yet.

    Face to face? It'd be nice, but both groups are spread over seven time zones.

    Conference calls are alive and well, and not "the rudest form of communication" by any means.

    As for the "logging" thing, one guy types in notes in a wiki or something, then slaps a "meeting minutes" label at the end. Done. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  83. How are you answering the phone? by devphil · · Score: 2, Informative


    If -- as I was taught, for business contexts -- you answer the phone with some statement including your name, then they wouldn't have to ask.

    Now, if you do that, and they simply ask for somebody else without identifying themselves, then hey, read 'em the riot act, because they're still rude.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:How are you answering the phone? by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1
      Just out of curiosity, If you called a business and someone answered the phone and said, "Hello, this is Amco Widgets." Would you say

      a) "Who is this?" or

      b) "Hello, this is devphil. May I speak to Mr. Amco?"

    2. Re:How are you answering the phone? by devphil · · Score: 1


      (b), of course, which was my point.

      If they answered the phone with a noncommital grunt, or even just "Hello" then I could easily be confused, because that's just rude. That's the question I asked the parent.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    3. Re:How are you answering the phone? by The+Slashdot+Guy · · Score: 1
      Oops, I answered a question with a question. I should pay more attention to the subject line.

      Anyway, When I answer the phone, I give an appropriate greeting and the name of the company. I may have been wrong about not giving my name, but them coming back with nothing more than a curt question is rude.

  84. Security by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Sometimes "hello" is the appropriate way to answer the phone. You may be working for an organization that has security concerns about volunteering information to callers. An unknown caller does not need to know your name or the name of your department/organization.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  85. Ahoy! Ahoy! by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I like Alexander Graham Bell's use of "Ahoy! Ahoy!" to answer the telephone. Sadly, it never caught on.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  86. Re: knocking on the door by LetterJ · · Score: 1

    I've always operated on similar principles, both at work and at home. In general, I give my attention to people in order of how much effort they exerted to be talking to me. So, in person trumps phone which trumps IM or email, etc. If you're standing in person in my office and the phone rings, I will NOT answer it. However, I'm amazed how many people will answer the phone when I'm in the middle of talking to them, even if they don't know who it is. I've always hated that.

    I've always considered this principle to be common courtesy.

  87. Favourite phrase in the article by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    "Glub Glub Mo-blon!" :D

    [http://contactsheet.org/junk/telephone3.html]

  88. Re:who uses a phone? by TheDormouse · · Score: 1

    why not find a decent long-distance service that doesn't charge a monthly fee and doesn't rip you off with highly inflated taxes. Not to mention rates that are probably less than your pet 10-10 number. Something like bigredwire. And I don't work for them, and I won't get any kickbacks for a referral. How often do you see an unsolicited referral like that?

  89. The cover by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

    Isn't it ironic that the cover looks like a call girl

    --
    Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
  90. Re:Usefull for guys by shadow_slicer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Arranging dates" is one thing, but asking someone out or any kind of heavily emotional conversation is best done in person (or *maybe* over the phone).

    And I disagree with your assertion that success with girls is all about what you say. In my experience, what I say is practically irrelevant. The most important aspect is body language: relax, look them in the eye, be attentive, have a non-threatening posture. If you master body language then it doesn't really matter what you say, because the mark will interpret what you say positively (subconsciously drawing context from your posture). This even carries a bit over the phone since your voice sounds slightly different depending on your posture and mood.

    IM conversations are more tricky, because the person will fill in the missing context from the environment around them (Well, that assumes they already know you. If they don't know you at all [or are really desperate], they're more likely to be optimistic). This makes it rather difficult to predict the responses even with a lengthy calibration conversation.

    Of course this is only true for the short term. The long term effects are more dependent on what you say (but that's outside of my area of expertise).

  91. Nigerian Market Literature! by Creosote · · Score: 1
    Ever wondered where Mme. Abacha developed the wonderful rhetoric of her email letters to you promising riches? There is no better genre of retro advice manuals than that produced in Nigeria a generation or two ago. Be sure not to miss the classic My seven daughters are after young boys and How to study and write good letters, applications, compositions, telegrams, agreements, better sentences, important letters, speaking in public and teach yourself good English.

  92. phreak by zagman · · Score: 0

    this article/site has 2600 written all over it

  93. Blinded by the white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a white guy, I find those 50's caricatures of "people" to be every bit as insulting and racist as the old black and white cartoon "monkeys"

  94. I find everyone check their email frequently... by RodeoBoy · · Score: 1

    It must be that they are dealing with you on their own time, or maybe just ignoring you all together.

    Email is a cop out when you don't have the guts to talk to the person.

  95. This looks familiar. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    This text is an instructional manual on proper telephone manners for secretaries, customer service personnel, and anyone else who must use a telephone as part of their job.

    It's worth noting that many of these not only hold true today, but that they're still taught to people today. I once picked up such a manual after I got my first technical support job, so many years ago.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  96. "Ruthless People" phone etiquette by Minstrel+Boy · · Score: 1
    One of my favorite lines from this cult classic:

    Danny DeVito answers the phone:

    "Debbie? No, Debbie can't come to the phone right now. She's got my dick in her mouth."

    He then hangs up the phone and says "Heh...I love wrong numbers."

    KeS

  97. Damn right it's true... by Otto · · Score: 1

    I have been to Ford HQ on many occassions, I have sat at those desks (I was a contractor to Ford, kinda), I have answered those ringing phones.

    This happens often enough to get really annoying. It's funny at first, but after the fourth time that day (usually from the same jackass who can't dial a damn phone), it's quite annoying.

    Hanging up on them does no good either. They try to call back and misdial it again. It's sad, really.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  98. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 1

    I have also come across a Herr Wanke. He works for a British company in Germany so it must of been intersting when London calls and he answers with a "Wanke"

  99. Long introduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was to answer the phone at a school once. They wanted me to say (this is Danish, translation follows) "Akademiet for utaemmet kreativitet, det er Simon" ("The academy for untamed creativity, Simon speaking") in less than two seconds. It took a lot of embarrassing attempts before I realized this took some offline practice.

    Yeah, they did circus stuff.

  100. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Sexy+Bern · · Score: 1

    There was also a chap called "Dertwinkel", which sounded shockingly like "dirty winkle".

  101. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really, given that "Wanke" is pronounced "Vahnke"

  102. I blame the M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are of the suck.

    Obviously it is them who did this to the world.

    I read it somewhere and now it's gospel.

  103. Helpdesk side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you've worked helpdesk for six years plus, taking thousands on thousands of calls, all from people who have phoned because they want something, your response to genuine personal calls can be, shall we say, slightly distorted.

    *ring*
    Pick up phone, brain automatically presents helpdesk spiel, slightly more awake part of brain cuts it off, brain gets confused and you say:

    "...Uh?"

    Yeah, I'm an intelligent, articulate guy. Really. Ignore the neanderthal who has apparently taken over my larynx. D'oh.

  104. I am currently in telemarketing by Xhad · · Score: 1
    The correct action is to ask them to flag you Do-Not-Call, THEN hang up. That way you may have legal recourse if you get called again. Or at least say you're not interested.

    Some telemarketers will throw you back in the queue if they think you might have been interested but your phone messed up.

    I feel for the person on the other end who is often just some low wage person trying to make a living, but that's not my problem.

    I'd wager "often" is more like "always" (I have less than $500 to my name, I'm basically jobhunting any time I'm not working right now), but honestly I wouldn't be offended if you just hung up. What bothers me is the people who shriek into the phone or swear me out, and then stupidly DON'T be asked to take off the calling list. Some of my coworkers put that type of person back into the queue because, hey, they didn't ask not to be called and it's not like the person that got screamed at was the one who made the decision to make the call.

    1. Re:I am currently in telemarketing by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      That way you may have legal recourse if you get called again.

      And tell me, kind sir, how many sweat shops do you sue in a year? GOOD FUCKING LORD! HANG UP AND LET IT GO!

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:I am currently in telemarketing by Xhad · · Score: 1

      That was directed at people who complain that the same people call them repeatedly. If someone's that angry at telemarketing and gets called by the same people every day even after asking to be removed, they might be justified in taking them to court.

    3. Re:I am currently in telemarketing by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      I have some property you might be interested in. What? No.... It's perficly legit. I just need to get rid of it for tax reasons. Deed? No...... It's free and clear. Let's do lunch? Hows your wife? My supervisor? I think... No, he's with a client, closing an account..... I have some property you might be interested in. What? No.... It's perficly legit. I just need to get rid of it for tax reasons. Deed? No...... It's free and clear. Let's do lunch? Hows your wife? My supervisor? I think... No, he's with a client, closing an account..... I have some property you might be interested in. What? No.... It's perficly legit. I just need to get rid of it for tax reasons. Deed? No...... It's free and clear. Let's do lunch? Hows your wife? My supervisor? I think... No, he's with a client, closing an account.....

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  105. Re:Liar. Nooooo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the nuclear missile launch code to ALL the Strategic Air Command bunkers!

  106. Re:Another oversensitive geek by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 0, Troll
    I don't think I'm being oversensitive. I also favor Tivo over a roll your own PC solution and I don't get a boner over Kevin Mitnick, so I'm not sure I'm really a geek.

    I know assholes have been around since Ogg intentionally tripped Oog during the mastadon hunt, but I think it's difficult to argue that the level of public decorum hasn't fallen like a rock in the past 20 years or so.

    As for paranoia, that never changes. From terrorists back to Communists back to "the negras" to "she's a witch" to, I dunno, huns or something. Although with terrorists and Commies there was SOME reality to the threat, even if it isn't always where we are looking.

    Same with the negras. HEY, I'M JOKING!! IT'S A JOKE! CALM DOWN!

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  107. Bell Systems publication by MemoryAid · · Score: 1
    I noticed on the last page of this guide the Bell Systems' logo. That reminded me of several similar booklets on different subjects my father brought home from work years ago. The booklets all seem to have been reprinted to order for the company, as they are marked "Western Electric Booklet Rack Service for Employees." Some of the titles follow:

    Useful Knots and How to Tie Them.

    Tips on Using Power Tools

    Basic Techniques in Woodworking and Carpentry

    All Kinds of Money, a lively and readable explanation of our country's credit system.

    There is another one that I can't seem to track down, that is called "The Richest Man in Babylon," and explains the principle of paying yourself first to become wealthy over time. These booklets are all about 20-30 pages long, and many are still a good source to learn the basics of a subject.

    --
    Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
  108. Importance or telephone ettiquete by harlemjoe · · Score: 1

    A discussion of why ettiquete breaks down BECAUSE OF new technology is as important as the one we have beeen having on slashdot upto now.

    In India, economic liberalization has only recently bought us phones and cellphones that work consistently and don't cross-connect. I remember a time when if it was raining out there was only a 50% chance you could pick up the phone and have it work, and I'm only 20 years old. In my district in Mumbai alone there was a waiting list of almost 3000 people waiting to be 'assigned' a phone (the old analog exchanges could only handle ~1000 lines each), and it often took a series of bribes over a period of MONTHS to have your phone installed or fixed.

    Consequently, most people my age and above remember a time when a telephone call was a 'luxury.' Therefore our telephone ettiquete is excellent -- if you call an older person and something goes wrong, he or she will wait for you to call back (rather than impulsively dialing your number and 'jamming' the network), people will always take and convey detailed messages, and if the person you are calling is in but not near the phone, they will never hang up.

    On the flip side, my roommates in America refuse to answer the phone unless it is for them -- thanks to caller id and that innate American selfishness. Consequently many important calls are missed in our household because I am out and nobody else recognizes the number.

    --
    shooting is not too good for my enemies
  109. Re:Another oversensitive geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Politicians like McCarthy fueled fears that Communists were plotting on every streetcorner to hijack America from within.

    It's much better nowadays. Now it's either Republikkkan brownshirts are trying to destroy America!!! or else Demokkkrats are trying to destroy America!!!

  110. Dueling is the answer to the asshole problem... by dublin · · Score: 1

    I mean, we really seem to live in a world these days that's an endless legion of assholes...

    People tell me it's the result of free speech and free expression and the tossing of old ways, but that doesn't do much to mitigate the fact that we live immersed in an endless legion of assholes.


    (I generally refrain from using language like this in posts, but in this case, I find no suitable alternative to "asshole" to succintly describe a person of that character, so here goes...)

    No, you're right about the endless legion of assholes. On this occasion of the 200th anniversary of the duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton we should consider that perhaps bringing back dueling would be a really good idea - the "asshole quotient" would fall precipitously if dueling were reinstated, for several reasons:

    First, assholes would (almost by definition) get into duels at far higher rates than normal folks. Even if you presume they attempt to preserve themselves by superior preparation, the odds are against them over the long haul, so the asshole population falls, and polite manners once again reasssert themselves in civilized society.

    Second, the smarter and more clueful assholes would begin to actually change thier behavior, staying a bit back from the line of offense that would be grounds for demanding satisfaction in defense of one's honor on the field of battle.

    Third, this would affect far more than just the behavior of assholes - eventually, people would once again begin to speak with greater regard for the truth. Let's face it - how long would Michael Moore last in a world where each of the dozens of lies in his new film could lead to a duel?

    In an odd way, then, dueling may be anything but regressive and primitive - it is in fact, a key component to an honest, polite, and civilized society, where people are truly held accountable for their words and their actions by the society itself...

    --
    "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
  111. Re: knocking on the door by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

    Wow! I knew that some parts of American society were wierd but shouting at people for knocking on your door ?!?!? That's a different planet as far as I'm concerned.

    In what part of the states do people do things like that ? I can;t imagine it happening in the parts I've been to.

    --
    No but, yeah but, no but...
  112. Instant Feedback by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    I used to try to use email for communication at work, but frankly, it's just too hard to know whether the other person ever received my message. If you don't get a reply within a week, you're left wondering if he's read it and not gotten around to responding (or decided the email didn't need a reply), it got lost in transit, or if it's languishing in his email folder unread due to overwhelming email or bad filtering. And heaven forfend that you should email on something that you want a response by day's end! In contrast, I can generally dial a phone number and within seconds either be speaking to the person in question or know that they're not there/available. Personally, I hate talking on the phone (if there's background noise, I often have a horrible time trying to follow what they're saying), but for business, it's necessary.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  113. Re:The only thing you need to know about telephone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the proper greeting is "Ahoy, Ahoy"

  114. Re: knocking on the door by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    In what part of the states do people do things like that ?

    All of them.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  115. Me: Another oversensitive geek by xtermin8 · · Score: 1

    I count myself among oversensitive geeks btw. Live chicken heads, mmmmmm!