Slashdot Mirror


Alienware Reveals 4GHz desktop

keeleysam writes "c|net news.com is reporting that Alienware is going to ship a 4GHz desktop. The new Area-51 ALX, introduced on Friday, uses overclocking, or the practice of pushing a processor past its factory speed setting, to elevate a standard Intel Pentium 4 chip to 4GHz. Because overclocking a processor can cause it to overheat, the desktop also includes a special liquid-cooling system devised by Alienware. Purchasing the 4GHz Area-51 ALX desktop is an expensive proposition for most consumers, as the machine starts at about $4,200, according to pricing on Alienware's ALX Web site."

363 comments

  1. link by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1, Informative
    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or, alternatively, one that actually works!
      http://www.alienware.com/ALX_pages/area51_ alx.aspx

      *shakes head at mods*

    2. Re:link by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sorry guys... link is broken ... I went on the assumption that the problem with the link was the missing slash after ".com" ... but I guess that wasn't it! Apparently the original poster is just an idiot.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    3. Re:link by wpmegee · · Score: 1, Redundant

      That link doesn't work, you lose. The correct link is: http://www.alienware.com/alx_pages/main_content.as px

    4. Re:link by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Informative

      Liebermann has been selling 4.2GHz rigs with watercooling for a while now too.

      They have P4 boxes overclocked to 4.2GHz and watercooled Athlon64 "4200+" boxes as well, for the AMD equivalent

    5. Re:link by TitusC3v5 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I believe this:

      http://www.alienware.com/ALX_pages/main_alx.aspx

      is the link you're looking for.

      --
      And the masses cried out, "09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0!"
    6. Re:link by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sorry guys... link is broken ... I went on the assumption that the problem with the link was the missing slash after ".com" ... but I guess that wasn't it! Apparently the original poster is just an idiot.

      What's that saying about people in glass houses?

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    7. Re:link by flamingnight · · Score: 1
      Personally, I don't trust any site that says,
      if you have never worked with Microsoft® Windows XP, it is time you were introduced to the world's most widely used, exciting, and complete operating system ever assembled


      (on the right, under the picture of an XP desktop)
    8. Re:link by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      Also, anyone who uses Flash simply to make the flag over 'Windows XP' wave should be shot. With an elephant gun. At point blank range. In the head.

      (Bottom of the right hand column of the floating element.)

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    9. Re:link by timts · · Score: 1

      cant wait for dell to use this water cooling OC system and offer it at half of alienware's price, when it has promotion.

  2. yeah it's shipping today but when was it ordered by Harlockjds · · Score: 4, Funny

    considering how backlogged AW is i'm guessing the guy it's being shipped too purchased it last spring.

  3. Price is no object by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    ...when speed is a concern. However I cannot find on the Alienware web site what material is used for cooling.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Price is no object by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Go ahead, throw your money away.

      How much time before you can buy something similar for half the money? 3 months? 4? I can understand you're willing to pay more for the fastest available, but eehh.. to do what? Gaming? Get a quality motherboard, fast memory and one of the latest videocards. Much cheaper. Scientific calculations? Get a small blade server or mini-cluster, that'll better suit the job. Just to impress your friends? Get a nice looking case, do some modding, add some cool looking lights. Much more fun.

    2. Re:Price is no object by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      It would be more price effective to build a machine with two Opteron 246 processors. That's 2 x $400, plus an appropriate board @ $450, plus 4 x 512MB RAM (2-3-2-6, I'd assume that Alienware would put low latency stuff in their machine) for 2 x $400. Plus whatever top-of-the-line video card for a maximum of $500. Case for no more than $200. Reuse other stuff lying around.

      That's a no-frills power machine for... $2750. You could then splurge on the rest.

    3. Re:Price is no object by notoriousE · · Score: 0

      maybe some people want the fastest system around (at gaming, not serving, etc)... yeah in a few months itll be half price, but then theyll offer a 4ghz oc'd to 5ghz or something... so there will always been a top end... it just depends on how much youre willin to spend... personally I stay about a year behind the times on my hardware, but thats not to stop spoiled kids from getting the oc'd alienware

      --


      And then there was E
    4. Re:Price is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is it really that hard to comprehend that for some people, $5000 isn't a lot of money. Also for some people, the time it would take them to learn how to build a computer is more valuable than the money they would save.

      Seriously, the next time you go out to eat, take a minute to figure out how many packets of ramen or boxes of mac and cheese you could by with that money. Think of the hundreds of millions of people on the planet that would love to have that much food secured.

    5. Re:Price is no object by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well Christ, if that's the case, maybe they wouldn't mind buying me one too while they're at it. If 5 grand is nothing, then what's 10 grand right? It must be nice to be either rich or spoiled...

  4. Hello World by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ultra-Fast "Hello World" here I come...

  5. Re:How can it get any hotter by Harlockjds · · Score: 2, Informative

    which is why it's on a desktop, not a laptop

  6. Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can play tetris even faster!

  7. wow, thanks by b17bmbr · · Score: 5, Funny

    glad we got a definition of overclocking. i always thought overclocking was moving my clock ahead fifteen minutes so i could get places on time. but when i figured out i had an extra fifteen minutes, i just hit snooze. then i was late again. shit. so much for overclocking.

    --
    My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    1. Re:wow, thanks by Ciqala · · Score: 2, Funny

      i did the same, except i would push it even further once i got used to the current overclocking increment. i'm not currently 10 years ahead of myself, but there are advantages, apparently longhorn is finally going to ship anytime soon... no seriously.

    2. Re:wow, thanks by Lispy · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not impressed. Got your copy of Duke Nukem Forever already?

    3. Re:wow, thanks by mandos · · Score: 4, Funny

      On the last day of high school we "over clocked" the classroom's clock while the teacher was back in the dark room. Got to leave an hour early that day...

      --
      Mike Scanlon
    4. Re:wow, thanks by tetsuo13 · · Score: 1

      They key is to set your alarm clock to 18 minutes ahead, or some other odd number. This way -- when you wake up early in the morning -- you'll be too tired and out of it to try and figure the math and get up out of bed simply out of frustration.

      Works.

    5. Re:wow, thanks by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well, in all seriousness, the reason they give that definition of overclocking is because the PR people who made this press release want to be sure that all the kiddies who THINK they're cool computer geeks who know computers, don't know a damn thing, but have lots of disposable income (ie. parents who spoil), will understand that "this is a good excuse to charge more for it because you get the most TOP OF THE LINE XTREME GAMING MACHINE THAT THE WORLD HAS TODAY!!!! DUDE!!!!

      And yes, I say this as I type from my brand new Alienware. The trick is, they make solid machines still (they always did, thats how they got started), but you completely overpay for the gaming case, so get a "home office" setup instead. Its a helluva lot cheaper with the same components, and a Dragon case instead of a custom one so its easier to work with.

      And before some troll posts something along the lines of "well, real computer geeks BUILD their computers", I respond, "I'd get more money than I'd save if I build my own by working, and I don't really have freetime for it. But rest assured, I've built my own before, and its not THAT exciting."

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So true. I usually go with 17.

    7. Re:wow, thanks by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why did you decide to just make a stupid flame instead of actually point out what I said that you disagreed with?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:wow, thanks by grazzy · · Score: 1

      My point being, if your time is so precious you dont have the time to assemble a computer, how come you're able to post on slashdot. It gotta be like helluva expensive for you to hang around at site like this.
      Seems you're a regular too.

    9. Re:wow, thanks by AndyChrist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also, you don't really save THAT much money. (and all of it can be eaten up by shipping if you're buying parts from multiple vendors) The only way you're going to be saving enough to make it look like a winning proposition is if you're comparing it to a vendor like Alienware, who charge a premium for at least one of two things...exotic configurations hardly anyone uses; or the name on the box.

      Go with a beige-box type retailer (who usually have boxes other than beige these days) and you'll be paying like 100 bucks over the cost of parts. More if you're not paying the microsoft tax, of course.

      Honestly, for the trouble it saves, it's worth it.

    10. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i see my self on most of these words!!!! true...
      my conclusions about this topic:

      -use odd numbers so you lose conscience of the time lapse. like 7 minutes or 13 minutes or so.
      - do a "reset" every hollidays: what i do is on summer i reset the clock to REAL TIME in the real world. and i go with that until i start to get late and only then i start "overclocking" again
      - "overclock" progressively... start slow... with 3 or 4 minutes... then go to 11, 13, 17.. it think the max for me was almost 20 minutes!!!

      isnt anywone out there studying this stupid thing?? so strange to have to do it, but it works!!!

    11. Re:wow, thanks by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I seriously can't believe you just said that....on SLASHDOT! Do you have any idea how many people here browse from work? Its not like I'm NOT getting paid to do this now.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    12. Re:wow, thanks by grazzy · · Score: 1

      Well i suppose i _did_. What do you do for a living? Oh lemme guess.. you build computers..

    13. Re:wow, thanks by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I use the layered system...

      My alarm clock is 10 minutes faster(or so) than my watch which is 3 minutes faster than most reasonably accurate time keeping devices.

      As to why the watch is 3 minutes fast...I really dont remember why...maybe I subconsiously wanted to be better at subtracting 3.

      --
      Bottles.
    14. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just put the alarm clock on the other side of the room, so you have to get up to snooze it.

      This technique works much better when you do it to help other people instead of yourself.

    15. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're getting paid now, and you're doing this, but I seriously doubt you're getting paid to do this. :-)

    16. Re:wow, thanks by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      It's probably a good thing we can't track you down by any personal information, as there are probably a half dozen people now wishing they could get your ass fired.

    17. Re:wow, thanks by karnal · · Score: 1

      That worked for me for about a month, until I got really good at doing math while groggy.

      In addition, no matter where I put the alarm clock, I'll go smack snooze and get back into bed. Maybe I should go to bed earlier.....?

      --
      Karnal
    18. Re:wow, thanks by addaon · · Score: 1

      fnorgby?

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    19. Re:wow, thanks by GrodinTierce · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can understand not wanting to go through the hassle of building one's own machine, but why buy from an overpriced joke like Alienware? iBuyPower makes similarly spec'd machines (well, aside from the the overclocking) for waaay better prices.

      My 0.02.

      Full Disclaimer: My only connection to IBP is that I purchased one of their E-Series laptops several monthes ago, and have been very impressed.

      --


      Tierce
      Who sponsors your feelings?
    20. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's hardcore. Sounds like you got up to some serious monkey business in high school.

    21. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!!!!!!!!!

      Compared to retailers such as Dell, you can save a grand or two this way, even morseso if you read up on interrupts. The agp card can only fit in one place. Beyond that the sound card and network card generally are easy to fit,if you dont use onboard options.

      Get your geek/friend to show you how and you are set.

    22. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      how come you're able to post on slashdot

      Because today's labor day.

    23. Re:wow, thanks by Old+Telco+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I respect the fact that your priorities do not include building your own box, but if you bought an Alienware then you are obviously an enthusiastic user, so I'll make this observation: for enthusiastic users, I believe it is worthwhile taking the several days of research, couple hours of ordering and three hours of labor to assemble your own machine. I recently built a nice gaming rig for about $900, and the thing I like about it is that I view the entire machine as an assembly of replacable parts. It is a known quantity from top to bottom for me. I feel like I can diagnose or repair any issues it may have in the future, and I know the best ways to hop it up as time passes and I grow restless with its performance after a few years. I went through much the same process as you, eventually deciding on an Alienware or Falcon system, but I pulled out of that decision in the end and rolled my own. The money saved, the learning experience, the sense of pride and the control over the box made rolling my own an invaluable experience. This is less of a note to the parent poster and more of a note to those contemplating buy vs build.

    24. Re:wow, thanks by gfody · · Score: 1

      I want a clock that auto overclocks, c'mon thinkgeek

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    25. Re:wow, thanks by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that building computers vary in quality and value depending on who builds it and how. Not all geeks build a quality machine at a great value. There's a lot of things you need to know to take your system to the max that just isn't possible by simply looking over the specs of individual hardware.

      No, the fact that you have built systems does not increase your credibility in my eyes. I know way too many people that have built crappy machines whether they were intel or amd enthusiasts.

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
    26. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe because when you call in 2 years for a technical problem on your paid tech support contract, you want to talk to the company who you purchased the machine from, not from some yahoo who's getting paid to handle support from the liquidator who bought the company's assets.

      Stability is important. AW's been around a long time in this business, they're carried at major retailers, they've got a decent support department, and the last time I thought about building my own box I spec'd up all the components I wanted to stick insided - then looked at what AW was using... it was the same components, and could be bought for less than I'd have paid individually, and unlike the individual components, the AW came with a warranty and a support contract.

      Full Disclaimer: I don't work for AW, I don't own an AW, I merely started forwarding people who wanted me to build whiteboxes their way after I noticed the component matchup. I was tired of supporting whitebox people who wanted free support for life and were annoyed that they couldn't upgrade their 6-year old system to a current proc for the cost of the proc ("you said it'd be upgradeable!").

      I get to sleep at night AND the morons can still harangue someone at 3am when they install malware. Win-win.

    27. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and after he was fired, it'd be a shame if he tracked you down and split your head open like a melon. The personal information road is a two-way street, meatball.

      Besides, you never know what crazy sh*tball vindictive behavior will create. Best to just mind your own d*mn business, otherwise, you could cause melon whacking time. It's like Miller time, except a lot more splattery.

    28. Re:wow, thanks by euxneks · · Score: 1

      But rest assured, I've built my own before, and its not THAT exciting.

      You haven't poked the capacitors though have you. Trust me, that's pretty exciting. =P

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    29. Re:wow, thanks by acro-god · · Score: 1

      what I don't get is that the majority of Slashdot posters bitch about getting screwed... shafted... fucked... etc..etc...etc... (cause it's Microsoft) for what... 90 - 200 bucks for a copy of windows xp (which let's you play 95%-100% of all games and now I'm reading these replies saying it's ok to spend almost 5000 grand on a "gaming" machine that'll be limited to playing FrozenBubble (Since the majority of slashdot posters would have you believe that linux IS READY FOR THE DESKTOP (tm) and you can finally throw that trash M$ Windoze away...) Jesus Christ... talk about dumb logic.

    30. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just posting this as a reminder to myself to dig out my Ultimate Doom CD and e-mail you the .wad files. (and to have you expecting them, I guess).

      Hmm, Slashdot as my new personal organizer. Excellent idea.

      ND

    31. Re:wow, thanks by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      More exciting to put the proccessor in at a 90 degree angle from the direction it is supposed to go in. The proccessor my dad was putting in (t'was a 486) made a satisfying popping sound and left a fair sized hole in itself.

      Then again, poke at capacitors could be pretty fun too...

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
    32. Re:wow, thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ultimate Doom only has one wad file. And if you're planning to email it, why not just do a quick Google search for it? I'm sure it's on several abandonware sites. Downloading the game that way is just as (il)legal as emailing it.

    33. Re:wow, thanks by thatnerdguy · · Score: 0

      no just get a clock which allows to set how long the snooze is and set it really short.

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
  8. Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have always wanted to try out liquid cooling in my gaming PCs, but am petrified of bringing the box out of the house to a friends house for gaming sessions. Alienware usually puts together a pretty good package for it's customers, but reading the site doesn't give me any insight on its portability. My geeky friends feel the same way as I do - an article or study showing that the integrity of the cooling system remains after traveling with it would go a long way towards me taking the plunge, as it were. (By normal traveling I mean putting it safely in your car, securing it, and setting it back up, not waching it into a wall or some other moronic stress test.)

    --
    "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    1. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      I meant something on tomshardware.com or the like, not some iron clad sworn blood oath by the manufacturer. Holy smokes people love to get wrapped up in legalese...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
    2. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Grym · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't equate intelligence or technical adeptness with common sense. They're not the same thing. I've seen a guy who made a 1600 on his SATs pour hot coffee in his lap when asked the time.

      Besides, if the person were so smart--why would he buy a ridiculously overpriced computer to begin with?

      -Grym

    3. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Placido · · Score: 1

      SATs? Isn't that a multiple choice test?

      --

      Pinky: "What are we going to do tomorrow night Brain?"
      Brain: "I would tell you Pinky but this 120 char limi
    4. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Puff+Daddy · · Score: 1

      Alienware is charging $4200 for this box. If I'm gonna spend that much green on one machine, it damn well better be able to do everything I want it to do. If I were a LAN gamer, as many of the people who this system is marketed to undoubtedly are, not being to easily move the system around would be a make or break feature. I have no experience with water cooling, so Alienware is gonna have to provide compelling evidence that I can move this thing without breaking it.

    5. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I go to LAN parties, I make sure to kick every machine I see just to make sure they're well built. ha ha

    6. Re:Bring a lifevest for LAN parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to be so blunt, but if you were a LAN gamer, you would know how to transport your box. don't drop it, and don't toss it.

      Its not rocket science, if you are transporting said box, don't treat it like it was a box of stuffed rabbits, treat it as if it was valuable, transport it well packed and buffered. It doesn't take CS engineer to know that you shouldn't just toss it into your pickup bed like a sack of concrete and hope everything is just fine.

      And the average joe should have a clue here: a 4k or 5k box that size isn't 'like a rock'. If they do, its like those few folks complaining about how they broke their 'coffee cup holder'.(read, CD-ROM.)

  9. Cooling system by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 1

    Sorry to reply to my own post, but the cooling system is in fact water. Here is the proper link.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:Cooling system by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for this, but for the water cooling lasers I use deionized water with 20% to %40 alchol. Almost certaintly they use deionised water - otherwise you get minerals etc clogging up the pipes.

    2. Re:Cooling system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      Almost certaintly they use deionised water - otherwise you get minerals etc clogging up the pipes.

      Deionized water can be worse than distilled for piping systems. Deionized water can leach metals out of the pipe. All water corrodes metals, just that deionized (depending on circumstances) can corrode faster.

    3. Re:Cooling system by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Hence the alchol :)

    4. Re:Cooling system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the alcohol for most overclockers ends up in the overclockers, not the overclocked system.

  10. Re:What's with the submitters today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those alien cases look good. It's good that they put that huge vent in the top to pour your coffee in.

  11. link to ALX, not front page: by mrgreenfur · · Score: 0, Redundant
  12. for the AMD enthusiast, by John_Allen_Mohammed · · Score: 2, Informative

    alienware also offers a Opteron box too, for a cool $4,964.00 - The Aurora. Firefox doesn't seem to load that up here unfortunately, had to use IE :(

    --

    Skype Me! username: john_allen_mohammed
    1. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by soyuz_2 · · Score: 1

      Works fine in firefox 0.9.3 on gentoo.

    2. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link works fine here, firefox 0.8

    3. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? Loads fine here on firefox.

    4. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by John_Allen_Mohammed · · Score: 1

      Hmmmmmm, seem to be having probs here.... loads up fine using firefox on another machine, same version .9.3. Only thing that might make a difference is the 50+ extensions I have loaded on this box (only adblock on the other machine.) *shrug* Sorry about that.

      --

      Skype Me! username: john_allen_mohammed
    5. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by pr0c · · Score: 1

      Looks perfect for me in FireFox. I am using yesterday's build (20040905), not .9 though. One of the nightly builds fixed the screwed up looking slashdot pages too!

    6. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

      Actually, its not Opteron, its Athlon 64 FX-53. Its pretty overpriced.

    7. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Only thing that might make a difference is the 50+ extensions I have loaded on this box.

      What's the point of using Firefox if you're going to load it with so many extensions that it's slower and bigger than IE?

    8. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      It works fine on Safari (KHTML) on my iBook. Of course, now I can't afford the system shown in the link :)

    9. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      The FX series are just rebranded Opterons.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    10. Re:for the AMD enthusiast, by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

      Not true, although this used to be the case. With the switch to socket 939, the FX no longer requires registered RAM. The Opterons have always required this.

  13. Fixed link by buro9 · · Score: 1, Redundant
    1. Re:Fixed link by ThisNukes4u · · Score: 1

      You could build a computer with those specs for about $3,000, what are they charging $2,000 for the case?

      --
      thisnukes4u.net
    2. Re:Fixed link by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the case, tech support, performance tweaking, etc etc.

      it's the price you pay for getting an OEM box.

  14. $4,200 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people know Alienware is quite overpriced, but $4,200! I know you're paying for the aesthetics more than anything but still, if you want that power then buy two 2GHZ boxes and save yourself $2000, I can't imagine Alienware would have many people 'in the know' purchasing their hardware.

    I think this is more of a gimmick for advertising (seen by the fact it's on /. and now about 100 other news sites) than anything else.

    1. Re:$4,200 ! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      How do you play one game of Doom 3 on two boxes?

      I'm not going to buy this 4 grand setup, but still, the people who do buy it want one very fast system, not two slower ones.

    2. Re:$4,200 ! by Lurks · · Score: 2
      I'm amazed by the moaning about the prices quite frankly. The firm builds high-performance good looking PCs out of the best components with a price tag to match.

      No one moans about the coast of a Ferrari. You either have the money and want the goods, or you don't. Why does every computer for sale in the world have to be $999 and made by Dell?

      I should think Alienware has plenty of people 'in the know' that purchase their hardware too. Other people 'in the know' might have different values and different budgets than you do. Crazy but true.

    3. Re:$4,200 ! by bert.cl · · Score: 1
      How is this possible! I thought hardware was going to become free and we had to pay for software...

      My bad I guess...

    4. Re:$4,200 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever heard of parallel processing my friend?. Although there is no implementation to do that for 3d games (cause game companies have deals with PC/hardware manufacturers just to push you buy upgrades every now and then)

    5. Re:$4,200 ! by damiam · · Score: 1
      The firm builds high-performance good looking PCs out of the best components with a price tag to match.

      The point is that you could use those same "best components" and it would cost you a lot less. Alienware makes nice machines, but their markup is enormous.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:$4,200 ! by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      Just wait until the next gen of ALX comes out with dual vid cards on a custom mobo, those are going to run 6k to 8K

      If people want to see overpriced go to voodoopc.com, they are usually 1000$ more than AW for the same liquid cooled over clocked big Johnson type of pc And usually perform worse.

    7. Re:$4,200 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Id write Doom3 to support SMP based systems? I didn't think so.

    8. Re:$4,200 ! by nbowman · · Score: 1

      To use a car analogy, the people "moaning about the price" are kinda like the people who modify cars (Supras, Mustangs, Corvette, RX-7 etc) so they are as fast/faster than a ferrari, for half the price. They too talk about how overpriced the ferrari is. Crazy, but true. Except we build computers, not cars and are talking about 1000s of dollars rather than 10s or 100s of thousands.

    9. Re:$4,200 ! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You can't build a ferrari yourself for half the price.

      You can build an alienware PC from parts perhaps even down to the wierd looking case (I know you can get the style they used a while back) for a fraction of the price.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    10. Re:$4,200 ! by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      So in other words, no. You can't do it. Thanks for all the usefull input tho.

    11. Re:$4,200 ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $4200 is more than I paid for my crappy old car! I just can't imagine spending $4200 on a machine to play video games with, especially when the machine will be worthless in 5 years.

    12. Re:$4,200 ! by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      There's still not much reason to spend $4200 on one system.

      OK, let's say that I have $4200 that I've set aside to spend on gaming hardware. If I get the $4200 Alienware rig I'll have pretty much the best performing gaming system in existence... for about a month or so. Within 6 months there will be hardware outperforming it for less than half the price. The market price of equivalently performing hardware will continue to decrease rapidly as time goes on.

      The other option is to spend $2000 or less on a computer that will in all likelihood only have a 10% or lower drop in framerate in Doom III compared to the $4200 system. Then, later when the minimum requirements for new games starts to catch up with your computer, you still have another $2000 to spend on another new computer.

      If you want to be as close as possible to the best possible performance all the time, you're best off not buying the top of the line, but instead just upgrading more often. You should only buy top of the line components if a. there is relatively little price difference between the top of the line and the next best performer or b. the performance of the component is a critical bottleneck. If you've got some cash to throw around then buy a top of the line motherboard and maybe even a top of the line video card.

      Hell, the $4200 version doesn't even include a RAID set up which is relatively cheap with lots of (affordable) new motherboards having RAID 0, 1, and 0+1 capabilities.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    13. Re:$4,200 ! by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      I think the point is, if you were on like 300k a year, why would you build it yourself?

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    14. Re:$4,200 ! by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Just because you *have* it doesn't mean it's wise to *waste* it.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    15. Re:$4,200 ! by EDSdrone · · Score: 1
      > Just because you *have* it doesn't mean it's wise to *waste* it.

      Spend a few days selecting parts, building a system, getting it to work, updating firmware & drivers,, building it again because that "Oh so tempting clock tweak" fried my SATA RAID.... or spend a few days bouncing beachbabes on my knee while sippin fine beverages on my yacht. Hmmm toughie....

    16. Re:$4,200 ! by tallman68 · · Score: 1

      Good analogy (Time=money) except you can't afford a yacht on $300k/year.

  15. Gee PCs are expensive... by toupsie · · Score: 1, Troll

    I can't think of one Mac that costs $4,200 even the dual processor 64bit ones. And they say Apples are overpriced! Wow.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by Nomihn0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I can't think of a Mac that can run games . . . *sorry, sorry, sorry, not meaning to flame*

    2. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I must say, if you're gonna spend +4000$ on a computer only to play games well gee... get a life!

    3. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by ch3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny, I was just thinking that...
      My G5 costed me "only" about 3000 for a dual 2Ghz, is probably better designed inside and doesn't run out-of-specs (and the case doesn't look like plastic!)

    4. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by CdBee · · Score: 1

      I really hope I get to meta-mod "unfair" the moderator who did this (-1 Troll??? I don't think so , +5 Funny would be fairer).. check any mac thread to see that standards aren't applied evenly aroud here.

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    5. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you win.

    6. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by goMac2500 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... I think you mean the Dual 2.5 there... The Dual 2 is only $2500.

    7. Re:Gee PCs are expensive... by ch3 · · Score: 1

      I'm mean dual 2Ghz because it was the price I payed (or about so) when I bought it when it was top of the line ( :'( ).

  16. DUDE LAPTOP?? lol learn to read plz :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DUDE LAPTOP?? lol learn to read plz :P

    1. Re:DUDE LAPTOP?? lol learn to read plz :P by NuclearDog · · Score: 1

      "DUDE LAPTOP?? lol learn to read plz :P"

      I was originally going to say something about the pot calling the kettle black before I realized that you can probably read fine it's just writing you have trouble with. Perhaps a good book on grammar and spelling would do you some good. In closing:

      "DUDE GRAMMER?!? lol i r having no grammer :D"

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  17. Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Nomihn0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am curious why other systems manufacturers like Dell, Compaq, or Hewlett Packard, do not overclock their products. I would expect that, with all of the setup time they already devote to their products, they would be able to click a few more times in the BIOS as well. Not to trivialize the process, but with the consistency granted by producing the same computer repeatedly, that is all that would be required.

    These systems could then be sold at slightly elevated prices. The script-kiddie crowd would lunge at them, buying into a piece of the OC'ing action. The naive would purchase them for the in-between performance levels they would have. The rest would build their own computer and do it themselves. But, in the mean time, those companies get to gouge good customers - all while making them feel that their purchase was personalized.

    1. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OC'ing has stability issues, heat issues for generally little real gain, and you loose the warranty on your chip... Why would they do that ?

    2. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How the fuck do you loose the warranty?
      Is it on a leash like a rabid dog waiting to be loosed on some unsuspecting tresspassers?

      Oh...you wanted to use the word "lose" but you're too fucking stupid.

      Ok.

    3. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am curious why other systems manufacturers like Dell, Compaq, or Hewlett Packard, do not overclock their products

      Because many of those maufacturers thrive by the "low prices, high volumes" concept.

      Overclocking enough to notice, and without losing to much stability, requires quality components, careful tweaking of hardware, BIOS and software configuration. The first thing a normal user would do, is install some stupid proggie that interferes with that careful tweaked system, and cause helpdesk headaches for the company that sold them the box. Simply put, overclocking has the opposite effect from what's needed for this low prices, high volume market. And warranty issues make things worse. That's why overclockers are generally a different crowd than average home users.

    4. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by damiam · · Score: 1

      Or his/her finger slipped on the 'o' key. Not paying attention/bad typing skills != stupidity.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by jehnx · · Score: 1

      Oh, how the definition of "script-kiddie" has evolved... now, people even use it when saying nothing at all about scripts or programs!

    6. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      Too true, also unless Alienware do special things to their BIOSes the first time the battery goes on the systenm clock the machine will be back to default clocks.

    7. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why is it that people's fingers seem to ONLY slip on the 'o' key? Is there something different about it? I rarely see people accidentally hitting other keys twice, but I see "loose" instead of "lose" all the fucking time.

    8. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by CTho9305 · · Score: 3, Informative

      CPUs are speed binned by the manufacturer based on rigourous tests done in worst-case conditions (highest allowed temperature, lowest voltage).

      There are 3 things that let you overclock in normal situations:
      1. If the CPU works at 2.99GHz, but not 3.0GHz, it has to be sold as one speed grade down. This CPU would be perfectly stable up to 2.99GHz.
      2. If the environment you run in is not in the worst-case corner (you keep it cool, with good power supplied to the CPU), you'll be able to get a few extra percent.
      3. When the manufacturer tests the CPU, they know all the worst-case instruction sequences and critical paths. When an overclocker does a stability test, it's extremely likely that they're missing various speed paths, and eventually something WILL use one of those paths, and you get data corruption. Using games as tests and seeing if they crash is absolutely not thorough - if every floating point operation was coming out slightly incorrect, you probably wouldn't notice, but the CPU is in fact not operating properly. Why is it that overclockers with "perfectly stable" overclocks always seem to end up having more apps crashing / more problems with "Windows sucking"?

      If an OEM wants to sell a reliable machine, they'd have to do all the testing the CPU manufacturer does - the only thing they could do is guarantee a better max temperature/minimum voltage, but why bother? They're likely to gain at best 5% performance for significantly more effort.

    9. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by ameoba · · Score: 1

      For a while eMachines was doing this; not to produce high performance gaming machines but to get away with using lower-spec parts labeled as higher performance ones. Just one of the many reasons they developed a bad reputation for poor stability.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    10. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by svirre · · Score: 1

      There is one more reason:

      If the manufacturer get a high yield in the higher grade bins, but has higher demand for lower speed grades. They may choose to marke them down rather than forcing down the price of the high-speed parts by supplying too much in excess of demand.

    11. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Also a much higher cost. The machines used to test the CPUs are not cheap. Never mind the overhead in developing test content, which would be quite difficult for an outside party to do, since it requires detailed knowledge of the internals of the CPU.

      Considering the typical overclocking method is to keep increasing the speed/voltage until the machine is noticable unstable, and then back it off slightly, I would say there are most definitely speed paths the overclockers are going to hit at some point.

    12. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ii constanntly sllip on the kkeyboardd you insensittive clod! buut i cant arrgue with stuppidityy since ive beeen this way evver since i got my tonggue stuck to the elecctricall fencee for an hhour.

    13. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Nikker · · Score: 1

      Because if you know about overclocking would you really buy an intel chip why paythem an extra $1000 for them to OC the crap out of it?
      Then realize you could have bought the same system for $2000 less and clocked it your self?

      I think in this room I know what would be the choice...

      --
      A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    14. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      I've heard many people say this, but never anyone in the industry. It seems to me that if you had exceptional yeilds for high-speed parts, why not just drop the high-speed price and eat up the market share of your competitor?

    15. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am curious why other systems manufacturers like Dell, Compaq, or Hewlett Packard, do not overclock their products.

      They take a batch of CPUs, see how fast they can go and be stable, rate them, and sell them. They do this according to established standards. If there were to "overclock," you're gaining speed at the expense of reliability, which may be a bad tradeoff. Overclocking is just another way of saying "I lowered my standards." Why would you pay more for lower standards?

    16. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

      Because you will cannibalize your profit margins over time. Marking down high-speed parts is a way of coping with temporary shortages, not a business plan.

      --

      In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    17. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      The best-known example of this was the Celeron 300A: most of those were down-rated 450MHz CPUs. Overclocking started to get popular when people discovered this.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    18. Re:Why hasn't this been seen elsewhere? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone in industry SAID most Celeron 300As were down-binned 450s, or did they just overclock really well?

  18. Why why why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would anyone please tell me why it is necessary to spend 5 grand on a PC?

    Okay okay -- especially when XBOX and many other consoles approach PC graphics? This is overkill -- the amount of money spent on this one machine could be used to build a small cluster of less powerful machines.

    It is a shame that XBOX, a $300 dollar system can get amazing games -- but if you want amazing graphics and sound on the PC you must spend 5 g's.

    1. Re:Why why why? by 0123456 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Okay okay -- especially when XBOX and many other consoles approach PC graphics?"

      Approach PC graphics? At 640x480 with 32MB of RAM? Huh?

    2. Re:Why why why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why you'd spend $300 on an XBox when you can get a Dreamcast which also has many amazing games for $50...

      Or just get a pencil and paper. Infinite entertainment for $2.

    3. Re:Why why why? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      My computer joyfully and gleefully outpaces the XBox, and it's current parts cost me only about $575.

      Trust me, you don't need to spend as much as Alienware charges, and I've never known an intelligent person to actually own one. They may be nice, but that doesn't mean they're worth the price.

    4. Re:Why why why? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      They approach PC graphics????

      My 1200x1024 desktop monitor has just a bit more detail to the images than a TV set.... no, really!

      And comparing the fine detail my 1920x1200 laptop display can show compared to what a TV screen can show is just a joke.

      Console games are fun, but the graphics in no way are as detailed as what you can have on a PC. Sorry.

    5. Re:Why why why? by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know why you'd spend $300 on an XBox when you can get a Dreamcast which also has many amazing games for $50.

      So you could actually play new (professionally made, not homebrew) games, maybe? Whatever floats your boat though.

      Oh, and you can get XBox bundles starting at $119, not $300.

    6. Re:Why why why? by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      if you are going to use the x-box as an example at least get the price right.

      It's a 150$ system not 300$

    7. Re:Why why why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, maybe to do something OTHER than play videogames quickly??

    8. Re:Why why why? by dmp123 · · Score: 1

      Really?

      What res is 1080i HDTV?

      Xbox can do that, provided you have a game which supports it, so to laugh at Xbox graphics is kinda silly by saying 'its only TV quality'.

      You can even buy VGA convertors here that can do PROPER resolutions.

      David

    9. Re:Why why why? by damiam · · Score: 1

      The XBox has 64MB of RAM. But your point still applies.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    10. Re:Why why why? by Naffer · · Score: 1

      1080i is 1920x1080 at 60 fields per second. Each field is 1920x540 pixels in size, which is about as many pixels as an 1162x864 frame.
      Answer : 1600x1200x60hz is far and away a higher resolution then 1080i.

    11. Re:Why why why? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      Sooo, exactly how many Xbox games can do 1080i?

      First let's look here

      Next let's look here

      I count 4 games.

      Wow. 4.

      Not exactly a huge list, is it? Capable of and reality of are two different things. I think I'll stick with the PC where petty much every game made in the last few years can do high resolutions.

    12. Re:Why why why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that native or upconverted res?

      I can also buy vga convertors to watch tv on my monitor from a composite input. That won't make it the same as hi-def/hi-res.

      Excepting a very few games, IT DOESN'T HOLD A FUCKING CANDLE TO PC RESOLUTION.

      A perfect exmple is Steel Battalion. WhyTF do you think the actual playing screen is about 1/3 full screen? It would be very different if the huds were superimposed over 3d, instead they REPLACE it.

    13. Re:Why why why? by the_raptor · · Score: 1

      Maybe. Just maybe they aren't American? Here in Australia an XBOX is still around $300 (except for sales etc).

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    14. Re:Why why why? by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Not to mention you'll be able to get a 4Ghz computer for a mere fraction of the price if you just waited a few years.

      It's really unnecessary to be constantly buying high-end computers. You'll save a lot more money if you buy mid-ranged computers that can run current games just fine instead of super fancy-shmancy expensive ones that will become obsolete only 6 months later than the mid-range ones.

  19. Re:How can it get any hotter by Stevyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well I know that. The similarity I was trying to make is comparing situations where the heat can be maintained easily and situations where lots of heat is generated and it's difficult to keep things cool. If I had a desktop 1.8 ghz p4, it wouldn't be too difficult to keep it cool. But in a laptop, it's much harder and thus makes the user aware when the fans start cranking.

    And like in this case, a 3.2 ghz might just require a few fans to properly keep cool, but this is going to require a complex system which the user might be aware of.

  20. customization options by mrgreenfur · · Score: 4, Interesting
    it's odd to note that the 3.8ghz p4 ee with 2mb of cache is apparently $714 MORE expensive than the 4ghz p4 with 1mb of cache.

    I'm guessing that the 2mb l2 cache is faster, so why are we still following the fascination with clockspeed (other proof, like AMD, aside)?

    you know alienware has struck it rich when they include their own "ALX High Performance Network Cable".

    1. Re:customization options by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      As far as I understand it, the problem is that cache tends to have problems when you manufacture it. So the more cache you build in, the higher the chance that it will be broken, and they'll have to throw the whole chip away.

    2. Re:customization options by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      People don't like complexity.

      "4GHz is larger than 3.8GHz" is very easy to grasp.

      "Well, 4GHz can theoretically execute more instructions per second than 3.8GHz, but it all depends on the support structure like the cache, memory bandwidth, differences in processor architecture..." is much harder for people to get. Add in "and for most normal tasks, you're spending 99.9% of your time waiting for the network or the hard drive anyway, so it doesn't matter at all" and you'll just blow their minds.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:customization options by timeOday · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would not jump to the conclusion that the 3.8GHz with 2mb cache is faster than the 4GHz P4 with 1mb of cache.

      Yeah I'm aware of the "MHz myth," but look at the benchmarks please. At 3.4GHz, the "Extreme" edition bests the 3.4GHz 1MB cache version by a whopping 1.4%. Meanwhile the Non-Extreme 3.4 beats the Extreme 3.2 by over double that amount! Both are marginal differences if you ask me, but price difference is truly "extreme."

    4. Re:customization options by svirre · · Score: 1

      Actually with parts like this (large memory arrays) they usually build them with an option to mask bad rows in memory with laserfuses.

      Thus you get 2MB parts when all went peachy, and 1MB parts when some defects were detected (and masked).

    5. Re:customization options by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1
      I guess it all depends on what you are running on the processor.

      I have run a 200 user performance test on a 4-way pentium 3 xenon with 512k L2 cache (this was nearly 4 years ago) VS the same system with 2mb of L2 cache. End user response time difference? Zero. Hardware Price difference? AUD$40k

      They went with the 512k cache :)

    6. Re:customization options by Igmuth · · Score: 1

      Actually, if they are smart they start with say, 2.1 MB, and then can have a higher 2MB yield.

    7. Re:customization options by Naffer · · Score: 1

      The P4EE is based on the northwood core. It's faster per clock, and has reduced cache latency compared to the 4Ghz P4 1MB.

    8. Re:customization options by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      The 2mb cache might be faster than the 1mb of cache that is in the regular P4 (compared to the 2mb in the p4 ee) but I would guess that since it's an extra 1mb that it would increase the cost as well. Xeons were relatively expensive when they came out (and still might be but I don't follow them) because they had huge cache sizes.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  21. erm ... by fadir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be alot cheaper and better to purchase a 2 processor system instead of a extremely high-priced overclocked 1 processor system?
    Seriously, except the "coolness" I fail to see the sense in this system.

    1. Re:erm ... by Sumocide · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a gaming rig. How many games can take advantage of SMP?

      Right, zero.

    2. Re:erm ... by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on the application. There are many programs that don't take advantage of a second processor. Also, there are some tasks that can only be done linearly. A second processor only helps when instructions can be done in paralel. In those cases, the only option is "Speed Speed Speed" to get better performance.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:erm ... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Not by a long shot, as (for example) a 2x500mhz computer won't run as fast as a 1x1000mhz computer. It would be cheaper, but nowhere near as good for gamers (the intended audience)

    4. Re:erm ... by mollymoo · · Score: 1
      Wouldn't it be alot cheaper and better to purchase a 2 processor system instead of a extremely high-priced overclocked 1 processor system?

      If every game (this is a gaming machine) was multi-threaded then yes. But they aren't. So no.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    5. Re:erm ... by the+unbeliever · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quake 3 has SMP support.

      Granted, that's about *it* that I'm aware of.

    6. Re:erm ... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Seriously, except the "coolness" I fail to see the sense in this system.

      It's Alienware. The coolness is the product. What, you think a computer is worth over a couple grand?

    7. Re:erm ... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      How many games can take advantage of SMP?

      Right, zero.

      That's about the same number of games that are bottlenecked by CPU clock frequency as opposed to memory bandwidth or GPU operations.

    8. Re:erm ... by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      UT2004 (and UT2003, I think) uses a second thread for all sound processing.

      I get a healthy boost on my P4 with HT enabled versus with HT disabled. I can only assume it's even more pronounced on a true SMP rig.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    9. Re:erm ... by hobbesmaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, a lot of them do. Its this thing called hyperthreading that intel introduced that caused a lot of game developers to go ahead and make their games multithread friendly so that there'd be a speed increase on northwood-Cs. I have a friend (a very rich friend) that bought a dual Xeon 3.06 ghz box for his gaming system. Looking at task manager with UT2004 up shows that at least that game has multithreading support and will use all 4 virtual processors. So will Doom3... and I imagine any game using either of those game's engines will too.

    10. Re:erm ... by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      Doom3 does not support SMP.

    11. Re:erm ... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      umm, yeah well the computer still uses the extra processor to run jobs on which frees up a lot of time for an application that is CPU intensive.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    12. Re:erm ... by damiam · · Score: 1
      It's not as good for gaming, but better for almost anything else. Dual-processor systems "feel" much faster than they are, because the system is never bogged down by a single CPU-intensive process. You can be encoding video, rendering animations, launching programs, whatever in the background and whatever you're doing in the foreground is still just as fast.

      Besides, the CPU is rarely the bottleneck in gaming (as long as you have a decent one). A 4Ghz P4 will probably only get you 10% more FPS than a (thousands cheaper) 2.5Ghz, as long as both systems have the same vidcard and RAM.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    13. Re:erm ... by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately Quake 3's SMP support is buggy and I think it has been removed from all recent patches.

      I had a dual P3 system back when 1Ghz P3s were the best and the performance difference with SMP on in Quake 3 was something like 5fps, which made no real difference to the gameplay. :(

    14. Re:erm ... by ameoba · · Score: 1

      You forget that there's a premium on SMPable hardware; I like to think of it as the 'enterprise tax'. The motherboards cost more, the chips cost more, and they often require more expensive types of memory.

      Then you have to realize that if SMP systems become common, affordable and usable for gaming, you're still going to have some boutique computer maker push out ridiculously overpriced, slightly overclocked systems and there'll be suckers that buy them.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    15. Re:erm ... by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a difference in using all virtual processors and using all the virtual processors.

      Right now every single process runnin in WinXp on my machine is using both "processors" on my 2.6ghz P4.

      When I play games... the same thing. BUT... that does NOT mean that the games are actually taking advantage of the hyperthreading support - it just means that Windows is sending operations to both "processors".

      The game would need to be developed specifically for use with dual cores/processors to take full advantage. Even benchmarks have shown that using hyperthreading with some programs make them perform poorly compared to normal usage, even though they are runnin on all virtual processors.

    16. Re:erm ... by xRelisH · · Score: 1

      I thought some of the newer ones like Doom 3 and HL2 [will] have SMP.

  22. Working Link by barcodez · · Score: 1, Informative
    --

    ----
  23. Does AlienWare cover warrantee, since Intel wont? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    By taking the CPU over Intel's rated speed, there's no warrantee from Intel. Does Alienware promise to replace 'em if they fail during a (nominal) warrantee period?

    --
    GMail invites for iPod referrals

  24. speed changes - prices don't by apikoros · · Score: 0, Troll

    Once again proving both the truth of Moore's law (data density doubles approximately every 18 months) and Dolan's corollary (the computer you want costs approximately $5,000) The IBM PC cost $5,000 in 1980, the Alienware Area-51 ALX costs $5,000 in 2004.

    1. Re:speed changes - prices don't by dave420 · · Score: 1

      $4,200 isn't $5,000. In fact, it's closer to $3,500 than $5,000, which shows that "Dave420's law" (people always round up/down statistics to prove their point) is still alive and kicking ;)

    2. Re:speed changes - prices don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would also like to mention Inflation. If the prices are eaxctly the same in terms of when it was purchased. It would mean that todays computers is actually a whole lot cheaper.

    3. Re:speed changes - prices don't by apikoros · · Score: 1

      The magic words in the CNet article are "starts at", the advertised price out the door at the Alienware site is over $5K. I've bought OTS machines for a bit less and a bit more but it works as a general rule.

      The exact number of chips on a CPU has not exactly doubled every 18 months on the dot either, but as a general rule they do double at roughly that frequency and the price of the machine you lust after will be on the order of $5K.

    4. Re:speed changes - prices don't by jbecherv · · Score: 1

      Not that I think "Dave420's law" is incorrect, but $5000 could be closser to what that particular poster would have to pay, depending on where they live. If this person lives in Florida, then after shipping and taxes, they are paying over $4700 for the $4200 system ($4700 is much closer to $5000 than it is to $3500, but still rounding up). If this person lives in Canada, then they would be forking out half a years salary (assuming a one-person family living at the poverty line) at well over CDN$6250 (after shipping, taxes, and brokerage fees)!

  25. Alternatively.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...buy a few 2GHz boxes and an Ethernet switch for the same money, invite a few buddies over for some networked UT2004, Counter-Strike & Red Alert 2.

    I'm sure the group of people who buy overpriced Alienware products are the same group who'd pay for penis extensions.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:Alternatively.... by jea6 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sell penis extensions. How else could you afford an Alienware?

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    2. Re:Alternatively.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      are the same group who'd pay for penis extensions

      um...I think that would be overcocking

    3. Re:Alternatively.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, we've got two systems, a 2700+ and a 2500+, with 9800 Pro and 9600 Pro. All together it would likely be around $1000 per machine, and that's in Canadian dollars. That is less than half of the price of the one Alienware, and it's great when you have some friends over to play a few games over the LAN.

    4. Re:Alternatively.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha. Loser. My monitor cost more than your computer.

    5. Re:Alternatively.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $300 For a 19" monitor. I don't know why you need to spend over $1000.

  26. Undervolting is the new overclocking by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to overclock, but squeezing out the highest performence-per-watt is more fun these days. I read about it on silentpcreview.com and gave it a try. It turns out that Athlon 64 CPUs can usually run full speed at 1.3V (vs. 1.5V), which cuts power consumption almost in half. 1.8GHz (3000+) at 1.2V (35W max), 1.4GHz at 1V, and 1GHz at 0.85V (maybe a dozen watts) work well too. Someone with a newer CPU than I have managed 1.2GHz @ 0.875V. Use ClockGen to tweak the clock multiplier and core voltage under Windows. (Does anyone know of a Linux equivalent? 64-bit compatible?)

    I watched a bit over 3 hours of DVD video on my HP zv5000z with the CPU set to 1GHz @ 0.85V before the 12-cell battery ran out. Normal screen brightness and everything.

    Of course, this won't work all that well on Intel CPUs. Maybe Alienware will include a free naquada generator with their "4GHz" P4's.

    1. Re:Undervolting is the new overclocking by Jagasian · · Score: 2, Informative

      The CPUspeed daemon on Linux automatically scales my CPUs voltage and frequency depending on the system load, but I use a Pentium 4 based laptop. The Transmeta Crusoe has similar capabilities.

      Anyway, its completely automatic, so I don't have to do anything. However, for those that want to tweak, you can hack kernel options, or use a separate program called "Laptop Mode". Note you don't need to use laptop mode with an actual laptop. Laptop mode has great features for tweaking harddrive power save features. Just google it, its great stuff.

  27. Sweet! by MP3Chuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hear it gets over 30FPS on Doom 3 too!

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. You get what you pay for.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    When you buy an el cheapo knockoff for a lot less, you get cheaper (read slower/less reliable) peripheral hardware such as disk controllers, disks, video cards, RAM, cheap keyboards and mice that last one month if you're lucky, etc.

  30. G5 by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, the surprising thing to me is that a similarly configured (but with more features) loaded 2.5 Ghz Dual G5 from Apple (with liquid cooling as well) runs about $2300 cheaper than the Alienware box.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:G5 by Mitleid · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the game library is hardly anything comparable to what you can get on an Alienware machine.

      --

      --
      Is it me, or did it just get fatter in here?
    2. Re:G5 by Moraelin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Except you seem to miss in which section of slashdot this is: games.slashdot.org

      Those dual macs are nice, no doubt, but until their games library grows a little (as in, about 10 times), "gaming" is just about the last word I'd associate with them.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite what Steve-o told you, that G5 is nowhere near as fast as high-end Pentium or AMD chips.

    4. Re:G5 by sh0dan · · Score: 1

      Wow! That'll be the first time I've seen the price being listed as a pros on Macs!

      But unfortunately a Mac is no choice for me, as I'll need a PC for playing Duke Nuke'm Forever, soon!

    5. Re:G5 by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Well, the surprising thing to me is that a similarly configured (but with more features) loaded 2.5 Ghz Dual G5 from Apple (with liquid cooling as well) runs about $2300 cheaper than the Alienware box.


      I'm sorry, you can't use weak girly excuses, like logical arguments, on gamers. They're all after the shiny.
      Maybe if the next G5 system went back to a cube design, with blue neon...
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    6. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the Dual G5's are slower than the Alienware box.

    7. Re:G5 by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      Although the knee-jerk reaction is to mod troll, he's got a good point. Alienware makes gaming machines, Apple doesn't. The comparison isn't really a valid one.

    8. Re:G5 by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      your an idiot.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    9. Re:G5 by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      yeah... an over clocked Pentium chip is faster than a dual 2.5 GHz G5 box.

      do you have any education in Computer science?

      if you say yes, then you are either lying, were not paying attention, or just stupid.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    10. Re:G5 by NaughtyNimitz · · Score: 1

      Hmm, even Duke Nuke is on Mac. Even the newest is being ported.

      Hey, i am a hardworking sob (weblanguage, javaprogramming, office, photoshop, Motion (! beat that!)) but i luv to play games hard!
      -> Battlefield 1942
      -> American Army
      -> Medal Of Honor
      -> Call of Duty


      I do think we lack a lot of good simulators after the demise of Falcon 4.0

      So, the Alienware is alien to me...

    11. Re:G5 by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention that the Dual G5's are slower than the Alienware box.

      Even if it was so, is it worth the extra $2300 to get Alienware?

      I think a single 2.5GHz G5 should almost keep up, maybe it does keep up with a 4GHz P4 because it is the slightly less IPC efficient Prescott core. With Northwoods, 3GHz P4 was about as good as G5 GHz or Athlon64 clocked at 2GHz. that is a 1.5 IPC ratio. 2.5 GHz * 1.5 the IPC gets 3.75 GHz equivalent.

      Granted, there aren't many games available for G5 systems, and Alienware is marketed for gaming, I think it shows that Alienware is overpriced even when compared to a dual 2.5GHz G5, computers from the company that gets complaints from slashdotters and others about being overpriced. And I think Alienware's cases are ugly too. Why pay a premium for ugly?

    12. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no... you're an idiot ;)

    13. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice work to the apple fanboy mod who modded the parent down for saying something true. Pointing out a Mac's shortcomings is a cardinal sin - especially if it's a justified response to another Mac fan boy's pissing and moaning about how Mac's aren't overpriced.

    14. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a bit of extra knowledge that you can add to the computer science edumacation that you got at your local community college: Parallel processors are only effective if you have true concurrency. So for for running a primarily single threaded app - like say pretty much every game ever written - yes the single overclocked Pentium will be faster than your dual 2.5GHz box. Especially when most of those games run at the speed of nothing on Macs since Macs aren't gaming platforms.

    15. Re:G5 by NSupremo · · Score: 0

      Prove it.

      Show every number and every test.

      Then how about Reliability, Quality and Life of Product?

      --
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
    16. Re:G5 by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      here is a bit of real knowledge that you seemed to have missed. Operating systems run separate processes and having more than one CPU makes the system more efficient. again, a Duel CPU system will be better than a single CPU system. the original comment said nothing about single app performance, it referred to simply being faster.

      and just so you know, I do not have a CC education.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    17. Re:G5 by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      prove that having 2 processes running concurrently in an OS will complete faster than 2 processes running concurrently on a single processor? well, if you need the proof for such a simple idea then you are truly an idiot.

      proof: open an operating systems text book.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    18. Re:G5 by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      You've got two highways. One has two lanes in it, with the speed limit at 90 mph. The second has eight lanest in it, with the speed limit at 60 mph.

      The one that is 'faster' isn't the one that can handle the most traffic effectively. Modern multitasking operating environments are a lot closer to downtown LA than they are to a NASCAR race-track.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    19. Re:G5 by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 1
      A game needn't be restricted to a single process.

      In this day and age, I would expect games to be multi-threaded so that things like sound, background effects and game logic can run concurrently with the engine.

      --
      Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    20. Re:G5 by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I would expect games to be multi-threaded

      Isn't it a lot more difficult/expensive to code for multi-threaded programs (plus the fact that the vast majority of home users don't have more than one CPU)?

    21. Re:G5 by droleary · · Score: 1

      Isn't it a lot more difficult/expensive to code for multi-threaded programs (plus the fact that the vast majority of home users don't have more than one CPU)?

      No, it doesn't have to be. It depends a lot on what the language/system offers the developers. Since we're talking about the Mac, Apple's Cocoa provides an NSThread class for multithreading, which is really easy to use. The tricky parts all involve coordination between threads. If you can decouple code enough, running it in another thread (or even in another process) doesn't complicate things much.

      And you don't need multiple CPUs to take advantage of threads any more than you need multiple CPUs to take advantage of multiple processes. Think of a basic operation that a home user does, like a big file copy, and it's easy to see that is best stuffed into another thread so they can continue doing other things rather than sitting and waiting for it to finish.

    22. Re:G5 by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Think of a basic operation that a home user does, like a big file copy, and it's easy to see that is best stuffed into another thread so they can continue doing other things rather than sitting and waiting for it to finish.

      Thanks for the insight. Maybe you have some other clues for me.

      With my 2 year-old dual processor Athlon 1.8, I haven't noticed any better performance over a 2+ Ghz P4 at work, so I wonder if it's worth the money to go dual again. I've done some video encoding (digitizing old VHS to avi) but that still occupies both processors...in other words, I can't touch the computer while it is working.

      It seems like I'm wasting the 2nd processor's power for most stuff and even CPU1 is not doing what I was expecting it to do.

      Another thing I do have a question about is RAM usage. Is it true that the more RAM one has, the longer the wait between swap file activity? I assume all computers regardless of OS function this way. If this is so, then isn't postponing swap activity just setting the user up for a longer delay when RAM has to write to disk? Maybe this is called latency, from what I've been able to glean, but constantly adding RAM would lead to even longer wait times when the 4GB runs out, no?

    23. Re:G5 by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Yes, but games tend to not benefit much from multi-processor systems, while at the same time they tend to benefit allot from faster single CPU systems.

    24. Re:G5 by Jagasian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most games see very little performance improvement from a second CPU. Since the game is the CPU heavy process, and since the other processes running behind the scene are extremely light on the CPU... even though the second CPU runs these ultra-light processes, it makes very little difference. The bottle kneck is still one of the CPUs in your system.

      So when it comes to games that run on both systems, the highest end Pentium or AMD based systems will by far out perform the highest end Mac.

      Finally, considering that this entire article resides within games.slashdot.com... and that Alienware targets gamers... it should be assumed that performance is with regards to games. In fact, considering that performance varies for every system depending on the tasks it is used for... performance is ALWAYS relative to the task. Some systems are better at server stuff, some better at games, some better at office apps, some better at graphics apps, etc.

      Computer performance is hardly a one-dimensional attribute.

    25. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, how is Doom3 running on that box? Oh yeah, porting..............

      Same goes for almost any new mainstream game:
      porting..............

      Apples are definitely superior machines, spec wise, but a new game for for apple users has already been done like a $2 whore on friday night by PC users before the Apple guys even get a taste.

      Gaming companies know where their bread is buttered, although I'm hoping this changes with Apples being unix based these days. I long for the days when you had to reboot for games, you know, where their is the potential to cut out the OS middleman.

    26. Re:G5 by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      There is a niche market for Alienware's expensive computers. They are not even for the average gamer.

    27. Re:G5 by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Sorry, most games are single-threaded.

    28. Re:G5 by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      that would be the fault of the MS process scheduler.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    29. Re:G5 by droleary · · Score: 1

      It seems like I'm wasting the 2nd processor's power for most stuff and even CPU1 is not doing what I was expecting it to do.

      It might be a waste. It all depends on how the system allocates resources. I'm more familiar with how Mac OS X handles things than Windows or Linux. A Mac is very multi-processor friendly, with time slices being allocated by thread vs. by process (i.e., one process with multiple busy threads gets more time than a single threaded process) and they are dynamically allocated to a free processor (i.e., it's not uncommon to see a busy process ping-pong between processors while it's running). If what you're running doesn't schedule very well, it's possible that one processor is more idle than it should be. The other real possibility is that there is a software/hardware difference between the systems that bogs one down. A slower HD, cheaper motherboard, different OS versions, spyware, or any number of factors that can make two seemingly similar machines not perform similarly.

      Another thing I do have a question about is RAM usage. Is it true that the more RAM one has, the longer the wait between swap file activity? I assume all computers regardless of OS function this way.

      Generally true, but don't assume it. It really depends on what the OS does. Even if applications aren't using all the RAM, it's possible that the OS is caching and/or buffering things in a way that best uses all available RAM. In that case, it might make sense to swap out an inactive application, even though the user's applications aren't directly using all the RAM.

      If this is so, then isn't postponing swap activity just setting the user up for a longer delay when RAM has to write to disk? Maybe this is called latency, from what I've been able to glean, but constantly adding RAM would lead to even longer wait times when the 4GB runs out, no?

      No. You seem to think swap is an all-or-none proposition. Swapping is actually done in "pages", and the exact size varies but last I checked 8K was considered big. A good swap system will be moving around those little blocks well enough so that hopefully you won't have to sit waiting for it to figure out that a big 1G block needs to be shoved to disk for the next application to open. Putting off all swapping until the last possible minute generally won't be the fastest thing to do because the HD is so much slower. It's usually better to throw some stuff out to swap during an inactive period, and then you can just reallocate that block of memory if you need it for something else.

    30. Re:G5 by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      Thank you, after I re-read what you said, it made sense. Good description, I think I understand even though you are way ahead of me. Great to see experts responding.

      Paul

    31. Re:G5 by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. While it is cheaper - it's more like $1000 cheaper. I imagine you did not up the Mac's video card to a 6800 Ultra. ATI's 9800XT is last generations top of the line and can't compare to the 6800 Ultra.
      You can't do a really accurate compare between the two systems - a few things you get on the Alienware that the Mac doesn't have include:

      PCI-Express motherboard
      10,000 RPM hard drives in RAID configuration
      24bit audio sound card

      That being said the Mac has dual 64 bit processors.

      You just can't make an apples to apples comparison. I'm not saying either is better than the other - that entirely depends on what you are doing with the computer.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    32. Re:G5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This computer is obviously not about bang for your buck...

      Not that I'd buy it if I was rolling around in cash, but I guess enough people would.

  31. Re:How can it get any hotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dude, you're just digging yourself in deeper. Anyone who read your first post can tell that you thought it was a laptop. Just admit to being wrong instead of trying to talk your way out of it.

  32. I can think of a better deal.... by CdBee · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Dual 2Ghz G5. Perhaps not quite as powerful but a far more elegant design. Could probably afford an Apple Cinema Display to go with it for less than the cost of the 4Ghz Intel box....

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:I can think of a better deal.... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      It's for gamers. G5s don't have as many games for them, so how would it benefit a gamer? "Here's $1,500 to buy some games that don't exist" ;)

    2. Re:I can think of a better deal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how you all think everything revolves around doom 3 (I heard it blows), but get a life! Everyone here defending this extremely expensive machine should look at a larger picture.

      To the parent(s) out there considering a pc for their gaming teen, buy the Apple, and a video camera, and tell your child to be creative instead. (adult supervision recommended) There are plenty of games for Apple
      http://www.apple.com/games/
      besides if they're a "gamer", they probably already have plenty of toys. Give them something that they can learn to be productive on.
      http://www.apple.com/pro/

      I wonder how long until everyone realizes doom 3 is not the measure of success?

    3. Re:I can think of a better deal.... by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I once stood in the checkout line at CompUSA. There was a crying small boy and his mom behind me in the line. He was pointing to game shrinkrwapped-boxes near the checkout. His mom was saying 'no, that won't run on an Apple.'

      I thought it was a perfect marketing opportunity:

      "Macintosh- The Computer That Makes Small Children Cry."

      This is a games.slashdot.org thread. Shouldn't you be off somewhere fiddling with a spreadsheet or something?

  33. The Links by manavendra · · Score: 4, Informative
    One would have thought this would be prominently listed on their homepage. It isn't. Digging down deeper into the website (there is no search facility, mind you), here is what I found:
    1. The news page which mentions the 4.0 GHz CPUs Now Available in Alienware Area-51 ALX Systems.
    2. The ALX configuration page - As the name suggests you can use it to configure your desired ALX
    Btw, the moment you choose to configure, the price shoots up to $5,458.00 (which includes ALL rebates)!
    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
    1. Re:The Links by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      Btw, the moment you choose to configure, the price shoots up to $5,458.00 (which includes ALL rebates)!

      Erm, it even says below the price that it is before rebates.

      Hmm.

      Maybe it's just me.

    2. Re:The Links by jcostantino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The $5458 price tag includes a $29 network cable, among other things. I believe that in itself is indicitave of the amount of profit margin that exists on this machine.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    3. Re:The Links by numark · · Score: 2, Funny

      Even worse is the fact that they actually have no shame in selling an "Extreme" power cord for $59. I didn't know that power cords were so important in the performance of a computer...

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    4. Re:The Links by crackshoe · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh, they are - have you ever tried to boot up a machine without power?

      --
      Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
    5. Re:The Links by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      The ultra pure copper in the cable insures that there's no phase distortion of the 60 hz power signal.

  34. Too expensive.. by st3v · · Score: 1

    I don't see this computer as a feasible option for anyone... It is possible to build a Pentium-4 3.4GHz system comparable to this one for a lot cheaper. 600MHz usually won't make a difference at this point; it is the other components of the system that would slow it down. Personally I think anyone spending $4,200 on a gaming desktop is insane.

    1. Re:Too expensive.. by cluke · · Score: 1

      You know, I bet they don't even expect anyone to buy it. This is just their flagship model, in the same way car companies do double-figure production runs of crazy supercars. It's not for profit - it's for kudos and profile raising.

  35. Insignificant Performance Increase by mj2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OC'ing a P4 to 4 ghz isn't likely to result in any noticable difference... If you're a gamer (like me), a 2 ghz+ machine works just fine, slow-downs are generally caused by graphics card/memory issues... If you do a lot of multi-tasking you're better off spending the money on a dual processor system that has 15k rpm scsis, I assure you if you do this you will see a very noticable difference. I also noticed that alienware is using a raid 0 SATA configuration -- that's just downright stupid considering the data corruption potential.

  36. Re:How can it get any hotter by dave420 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Water-cooling, which isn't that complicated. Anyway, they're overclocking a 3.2ghz chip to 3.8, which isn't a huge increase.

    Seriously, comparing it to heat problems in a notebook is pretty silly, as there simply isn't the same amount of space available for a cooling system. I know what you're saying, but the comparison is pretty shaky ;)

  37. Dual PCIE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather them be working to get the price down on the dual PCIE systems. The kind where you have TWO processors working on TWO graphics cards.

    You know. For under $5k...

  38. Re:Does AlienWare cover warrantee, since Intel won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hmm, I for one would not like to be "covered" by Alienware, nor would I like "covering" by Intel ;)
    Main Entry: war·ran·tee
    Pronunciation: "wor-&n-'tE, "wär-
    Function: noun
    : the person to whom a warranty is made
    vs.
    Main Entry: war·ran·ty
    Pronunciation: 'wor-&n-tE, 'wär-
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
    Etymology: Middle English warantie, from Old North French, from warantir to warrant
    1 a : a real covenant binding the grantor of an estate and his heirs to warrant and defend the title b : a collateral undertaking that a fact regarding the subject of a contract is or will be as it is expressly or by implication declared or promised to be
    2 : something that authorizes, sanctions, supports, or justifies : WARRANT
    3 : a usually written guarantee of the integrity of a product and of the maker's responsibility for the repair or replacement of defective parts
  39. The correct link by p0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here is the correct link

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  40. Microsoft Tax by barcodez · · Score: 0, Troll

    I see Alienware PCs are subject to the Microsoft Tax (i.e you can't buy one and not buy Windows). I refuse to buy a piece of software I don't use and I refused to support a company I don't like the business practise of.

    --

    ----
    1. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a gaming computer jackass.

    2. Re:Microsoft Tax by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0
      This isn't that surprising. Most people who buy from Alienware are buying these machines so that they can play games. As of today, the vast majority of PC games run under Windows.

      You go right ahead and boycott buying from Alienware. But be aware that you were never in their target market because you don't play the latest and most hardware intensive PC games. [Yes, I know - Linux/Mac releases do occur of popular games. I am generalizing. I know this. You know this.]

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    3. Re:Microsoft Tax by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      Yeah, for rich gaming jackasses that have more money than sense.

      I worked out that if you bought *THE BEST* PC components there are currently, you'd spend about £1000 (= $1500) in total.

      That means Alienware is charging you $2000+ for a pretty PC case...

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Microsoft Tax by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So would you buy one if you weren't forced to get it with Windows installed?

      Assuming you use Linux and nothing else, do you game a lot, since that is (usually) the primary purpose of buying an Alienware machine?

      Somehow I get the feeling you're posting just so you can get in a jab at Microsoft - if you genuinely support the views you claim to, you shouldn't need to post just to basically say "Lookit me! I'm fighting The Man!"

    5. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, so you're going to blow money on a 4ghz machine and not have an operating system for gaming? ohhhhhh k

    6. Re:Microsoft Tax by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      And I recently priced how much the parts for a 'normal' (non alx which is very overpriced) AW would cost if purchased individually, it came out to around $1800 only $400 less than the system I purchased from AW.

      I figured I'd pay the $400 and let someone who knew what they were doing put the system together rather than do it myself.

    7. Re:Microsoft Tax by barcodez · · Score: 1

      I might think about it yeah. I don't play games no, but I quite like the cases - I like to have a fast machine because I do a lot of CPU intensive work (although dual CPUs would be better) such as Povray, PRP and large scale document indexing.

      My beef is not with Microsoft so much as the PC sellers (although I'm sure MS has them in an arm lock).

      Just because most people what to play games on them under Windows doesn't mean everyone should be forced to purchase one with Windows. I don't think that is unreasonable.

      --

      ----
    8. Re:Microsoft Tax by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I worked out that if you bought *THE BEST* PC components there are currently, you'd spend about £1000 (= $1500) in total.

      While I consider even a $1500 system to be a real luxury, I have to disagree about it being the best.

      $14609.43

    9. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      computers are general purpose machines, fuckwit.

    10. Re:Microsoft Tax by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      Just because most people what to play games on them under Windows doesn't mean everyone should be forced to purchase one with Windows. I don't think that is unreasonable.

      Fair enough. Whether you like it or not, though, the vast majority of people, especially gamers, have no problem with Windows being preinstalled.

      For your situation/beliefs, you would be far better suited to either build your own system, or find someone that builds high-performance custom Linux boxes.

    11. Re:Microsoft Tax by lew3004 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering when this would turn into an anti-MS thread.....

      --
      I still can't get the screen shots of Castle Wolfenstein for the Apple IIe out of my head.
    12. Re:Microsoft Tax by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Check out the Antec cases. They're a nice alternative (actually I think they might build Alienware's cases, but I could be mistaken) and you don't have to pay the extreme Alienware prices.

    13. Re:Microsoft Tax by GT_Onizuka · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken, can't you get a rebate for not using Windows (assuming it's preinstalled)? Like, as long as you haven't accepted the EULA, you can get a rebate? I swear I saw that somewhere.

      --
      If you take out Country Kitchen buffet, old people won't know what to do.
    14. Re:Microsoft Tax by benna · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would love that kind of processing power for video encoding. Of course, I also use a pirated copy of windows so if I wanted to game that wouldn't really be an issue.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    15. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. The EULA says "If you do not accept this EULA then the reseller can at their discretion offer a refund or replacement". Since the replacement will have the same EULA ,if that is what is offered, rinse and repeat.

      You may have to go through the Small Claims Court, but they will fild before you get to court and pay you costs and refund.

    16. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to point out that this thread has been far too civil until this point. Please note that any disagreement on any internet forum requires an unrelenting flame war.

      In the spirit of online argumentation I must say you both are jerky idiot monkey humping retards.

      Thank you. Please post appropriately.

    17. Re:Microsoft Tax by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      If your video encoding something that would lend itself well multiple processors, I'm guessing it is something that would lend itself well to being spread across multiple machines. The last couple of nights I have been ripping DVDs (that I bought and 'own') to 700M .avi files to burn to CDs so when I travel I don't need to worry about my originals (I play them on the laptop when waiting for a flight, etc.)

      Yes on paper the 4.0GHz P4 w/ HT Alien box is about 40% faster than the 2.8GHz P4 (w/ HT) box I'm using, but for $5k I could buy 6 of my machine (about $800-$850 apiece) and get them all working in parallel - and I could do about 4 times as much (400%) on the array of mid-range machines as I could do on a single AW uberBox.

      Funny thing is - in four years you won't be able to give 4GHz computers away for free.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    18. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having an actual warranty alone is worth, at the very least, half of that $400.

    19. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure you would. If you were going to give me, absolutely free, just about any working computer whatsoever with ethernet, I'd take it. Even if it didn't have ethernet, I'd consider it seriously.

    20. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When most folks talk about the best, they arent including thousand of bucks in hd's(8. Fucking 8!?!?) hd's and the controller, a shit load of ecc ram, or plasma displays.

      Go with 2 hd's 1/4 of 8 g of memory,(2g) and a projector with screen and you are down to $5k.

      Might as well talk about your personal cray being the best. It's like comparing a Viper to a Nascar stock car. Sure, the nascar car is a better performer, but its magnitudes more expensive than the viper. and, despite the name, their is nothing even remotely 'stock' in a Nascar vehicle.

    21. Re:Microsoft Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is, until you try to become a real business entity. Bill doesn't mind much when you pirate windows at home. It really pisses him off when you try to use his pirated software for a business. And believe me, when you go commercial, he'll check.

    22. Re:Microsoft Tax by benna · · Score: 1

      What I encode it tends to be TV that I need to encode just about as fast as I capture it. I can capture in segments and then encode each two minute segment right after its captured. I would think that it would be dificult to coordinate multiple machines for 2 minute files that I encode in real time and must then murge into 1 file preferably only a minute or so after the show airs.

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    23. Re:Microsoft Tax by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      Whether you like it or not, though, the vast majority of people, especially gamers, have no problem with Windows being preinstalled.

      Whether he likes it or not? Knowing the buggy and insecure nature of Windows, what sensible person would be happy with what you describe?

      Judging from social history, consumerism isn't exactly a very dependable measure of intelligence. The vast majority simply buy what's put in front of them without question. When you add illegal monopoly control of the marketplace to that equation, you get a generation of consumers who have been raised on the craptastic experience of Windows--and it's all they know.

    24. Re:Microsoft Tax by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whether he likes it or not? Knowing the buggy and insecure nature of Windows, what sensible person would be happy with what you describe?

      You'd be suprised. Though i'm sure you'd never believe it, it's quite possible to get a Windows box secured and plenty stable for normal use. The XP Pro box i'm typing this on now (for example) has been up for about a few months straight, with the last reboot being because Winamp was having some odd issues. If you get all the security patches, run regular virus/adware scans, don't open strange attachments like a dumbass, and use a firewall, you'll be pretty well off.

      The vast majority simply buy what's put in front of them without question.

      Yeah, I guess the fact that like 99% of all commercial games are Windows-only couldn't possibly have something to do with that, eh?

      You seem to have been looking for a chance to spout off about how evil Windows is, but let's remember that we're considering gamers in particular here.

  41. very un-slashdot like by sib888 · · Score: 1

    since when does overclocking have to be explained to the slashdot crowd? This reeks of marketing

    --
    I'm sib888, and I approved this comment.
    1. Re:very un-slashdot like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since overclocking was explained in the first paragraph of the article, obivously. Do you expect people to summarize the article when they submit it or something?

    2. Re:very un-slashdot like by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      I thought the exact same thing.

      Will the day come for a post like: "Linux Kernel 2.6.9 released. Linux is a clone of the operating system Unix, which is a..."

      sad, sad...

    3. Re:very un-slashdot like by Vengie · · Score: 1

      ......watch out. SCO might quote you in their next round of briefs as an "expert witness" backing their claims.

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    4. Re:very un-slashdot like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The majority of slashdot users are fat 13-year olds sat in their bedrooms, sending "MORE 3L33T TAHN j00!!!!111" messages to each other. I think phrases like "wipe front to back" would be useful...

    5. Re:very un-slashdot like by Skater · · Score: 1

      Except, when they use a term that people don't understand, there are dozens of posts bitching about that, too.

      Slashdot can't win!

      --RJ

    6. Re:very un-slashdot like by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      ...and I'll happily go to court and embarrass them revealing I'm just a stupid witness...

      but if you are worried about the "Linux is a clone of the operating system Unix", that one they can quote from kernel.org. That would be more juicy. I guess they've never been there...

    7. Re:very un-slashdot like by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      Right, but if there's no lower limit for that, we'll eventually get to the kernel example. This is "News for nerds", not "News explained so a nerd's granny can understand". ...and if someone bitches about not knowing the obvious (for a nerd), he gets flamed, and on the next time he'll google for knowledge before asking stupid questions, which is good for him and for the readability of Slashdot. If it's not an obvious question, someone will answer it, bitch the original poster, and he'll also learn.

      It's a self-balancing system, and explaining what overclock is tips the balance to the dumb side.

    8. Re:very un-slashdot like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. This is the norm of "news" on Slashdot. If it gains hundreds or even thousands of comments, it will be posted, journalistic standards be damned. (I block all ads, so I don't mind reading the comments here to laugh)

  42. Nice way to disguise that blatant advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a paragraph explaining overclocking to the Slashdot crowd?!?!

  43. mozilla by LousyPhreak · · Score: 1

    no problems here with mozilla 1.7.1

    --
    -- Karma: beyond good and evil - mostly affected by posting political
  44. When loaded with Longhorn by Dorsai65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the effective clock speed is 550MHz.

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  45. That's nice, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how fast is it? Do GHz really mean anything anymore?

  46. VISA commercial by erick99 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Doom 3: $49.99

    Alienware Computer to run it on: $4,200

    Losing the last vestiges of any proof of ever being in the sunlight: Priceless

    Cheers,

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
    1. Re:VISA commercial by wtlssndlssfthlss · · Score: 0

      Try Mastercard.

      --



      Karma: Terrible
    2. Re:VISA commercial by erick99 · · Score: 1
      I don't watch enough tv . . . .

      Cheers,

      Erick

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    3. Re:VISA commercial by Moonlapse · · Score: 1

      Actually its 37.99 at Outpost.com =]

      --
      - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
  47. $4200 used to be a more common price by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Interesting that the price tag is now 'expensive' for a machine assembled for extreme performance. It was not very long ago that that was a upper level standard machine.

    1. Re:$4200 used to be a more common price by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I remember when "the machine you want is always $5000"; today it's more like $2000.

    2. Re:$4200 used to be a more common price by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I once paid $1200 for a 486 motherboard, with 33 MHz processor and 16 megs of RAM.

      I once paid $2200 for a 386sx-16 laptop with 2 megs of RAM.

    3. Re:$4200 used to be a more common price by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      $4200 used to be a more common price

      I dunno about that... the rule of thumb for a mid-range PC used to be that every $1000 bought you a year of use (this is back in 1990ish). But ever since the late 90s, that rule of thumb has dropped to only $500/year. Maybe even as low as $300/year now.

      It was pretty easy to spend $3k back in 1990 for a mid-range machine, but that price dropped to $1200-$1500 a few years ago and is holding pretty steady.

      A good MB is $150, plus $300 for a CPU (anything more expensive is a rip-off for the amount of performance you'll get), and another $400 for 2GB of RAM. Case + misc components won't run you much more then $300, plus another $200 for a hard drive of some sort. Plus the windows tax of $135 (call it $150) and shipping costs of around $100.

      I'm only up to $1600 (basically, a 2.4Ghz Opteron system with 2GB of ECC PC3200).

      A good 19" CRT is only $300 or $600 for a good LCD. There are very good video cards in the $175-$250 range, or you can spend $400-$500 for the top of the line models. (Bit of a waste, but there you have it.)

      So the final cost for a homebuilt gaming rig is somewhere between $2000 and $2700.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    4. Re:$4200 used to be a more common price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much was the 486 system with a 66dx chip?

      How much was the 386 dx laptop?

      Without context, you could either have been a bleeding edge insider or a dumbass with too much money.

      I once paid $70 for 4 megs of ram, where was I?

    5. Re:$4200 used to be a more common price by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      I once paid $70 for 4 megs of ram, where was I?

      Considering the fact that I once paid $120 for 256K of RAM, you were probably in nursery school.

  48. Welcome to the mid 90's! by stienman · · Score: 1

    ...
    So - they're telling us that going back to -shudder- less than $1.00 per MHz is progress???

    Dude, I know there's profit incentives out there, but you can buy a serious 2 way 64 bit machine for that much which would blow that thing out of the water, even running 32 bit windows xp professional.

    $1 per MHz... They must seriously be pining for the old days. Let it go, man. Just let it go...

    -Adam

    1. Re:Welcome to the mid 90's! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A $4,200 WinXP machine that's been overclocked and tuned for gaming isn't going to be used for anything serious, so obviously when it comes to serious tasks it'd get it's ass handed to it. Of course, I wouldn't want to run Doom3 on a 2 way enterprise server either...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Welcome to the mid 90's! by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have minded a 486 for $50.

  49. Alienware has the best marketing department by Str8Dog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Alienware's dirty little secret is they are all marketing. My wife bought me one of their laptops last year based on their awesome marketing. After getting the run around on out of stock parts and waiting for damn near 2 months, the laptop came without SP1 installed, a virus in the windows system restore files and a faulty backlight switch.

    It took over a month to get the laptop back when I sent it in to get the backlight switch fixed.

    Their customer service is severly lacking. I would highly suggest you build it yourself instead of paying for Alienware's marketing department.

    You can read my whole sordid tale on this topic at my website along with several other peoples comments.

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
    1. Re:Alienware has the best marketing department by condition-label-red · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most of Alienware's notebooks are re-branded Sagers (which are made by Clevo). A couple of years ago I got a Sager from PowerNotebooks and a few weeks later Alienware came out with a near identical notebook (their original Area 51-M) for about $1k more. Check out this for more details.

      As always--It pays to shop around!

      --
      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit.
    2. Re:Alienware has the best marketing department by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well, there's always fluke accidents.

      I just got a new alienware, and while there were some hastles ACTUALLY BUYING IT, it works excellently. Its running amazingly, but this could just be afterglow from a new computer after living with a 1ghz 384mb RAM geforce1 64mb ddr for 5 years.

      Ok, onto the story.

      So I talk to the guy on the phone after creating a system on the website. Never order a computer just off a website, always speak to someone.

      He gave me a quote, and a promised ship date of August 6th.

      Then calls back a couple days later, explaining that the ship date will have to be later because they're having trouble getting the nvidia card they had in stock. I chose that card because it had a MUCH shorter ship date than the ATI card which was limited availability, but a little more expensive. So he says he'll switch me for the ATI card, which he apparently has in stock and now according to the webpage, has the ship date that the Nvidia chip had, and the Nvidia chip is now limited availability.

      Now, aside from not understanding HOW THE HELL THIS COULD POSSIBLY HAPPEN, he did knock about a hundred off the card.

      Then, few days later we find out it will ship later than the 6th, because they have to "test" the computer. I'm furious. The reason I need this computer BY THE 18TH of August was because I needed to transfer files to it before I came up to school with it.

      They refuse to airship it because of potential damage, and I get the guys supervisor on the line. Now, the thing with these guys is, they're all based in Florida, and the guys on the phone are all mexican. Now, I don't like stereotyping, but apparently Alienware does. All of the Mexican guys use a fake American Sounding (TM) name instead of their real Mexican Sounding (TM) name. I can only guess that the Marketing Department at Alienware thought it would make the parents feel more comfortable buying a system from them.

      I dunno. Anyways, it ships, finally, after me telling the guy that if it doesn't ship by this date, he'd better drive it up from Florida (to IL) himself to get it to me on time. So then we find out that the $150 rebate he promised, couldn't be done. So he gave us a $75 rebate and a $75 coupon from Amazon, because my father uses that heavily and it wouldn't be a problem.

      Anyways, then when the thing ships, it looks like the speakers will arrive before the computer, and the computer won't arrive on time apparently. So then I go through some HUGE hastles with UPS who are completely incompetent and don't even know where their packages are.

      Finally, the computer arrives, but its missing the $75 rebate, (the $75 amazon coupon shipped Express in its own UPS envelope and arrived a day earlier) and its also missing the keys to lock the tower (not that that would ACTUALLY stop someone who REALLY wanted to gain access to the front, as I could just snap the door off).

      Finally, they mail everything to me. But its over, and I enjoy my new box.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Alienware has the best marketing department by realdpk · · Score: 3, Funny

      The moral of the story: Don't send money to Florida companies.

    4. Re:Alienware has the best marketing department by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      after living with a 1ghz 384mb RAM geforce1 64mb ddr for 5 years

      Woah. How did you get your hands on a 1GHz comp in '99? :)

      Now, I don't like stereotyping, but apparently Alienware does. All of the Mexican guys use a fake American Sounding (TM) name instead of their real Mexican Sounding (TM) name. I can only guess that the Marketing Department at Alienware thought it would make the parents feel more comfortable buying a system from them.

      Its not just Alienware, thats SOP for foreign call centers who service English customers (I would be willing to bet that Alienware outsources). Its referred to simply as "the call center name", instead of going by their real name, Kausenflakepepau, they go by Dave.

  50. Re:Does AlienWare cover warrantee, since Intel won by Vireo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes. And you can buy extended warrantees, tech support, etc., just as with any other computer.

  51. Let me get this straight... by rincebrain · · Score: 1

    You want us to pay $4200 for a system which, not only is overloaded with shiny blinkenlights, but is also overclocked, and so not guaranteed to be completely stable? And you expect us to run Windows on it!?

    ...the sad part is, people will buy it. People bought Windows ME, after all.

    --
    It's only an insult if it's not true.
    1. Re:Let me get this straight... by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Maybe they figure that the software provides enough instability so that the harware instability doesn't matter? Or vice-versa?

      Actually...good plan! Good plan!

    2. Re:Let me get this straight... by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, overclocking voids manufacturers warranty, on anything overclocked, like procerror, memory, video card. You will only get servie from Alienware, if you can call that service. We have had ten of them in to the white box store where I'm working in the last 6 months, because the owners were fed up with Alienware! Each one was less than a year old.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  52. Re:You'll need it by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 1

    No, I use all this free time I got to play with myself... fast.

  53. Family Guy quote. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha ha! Oh gosh that's funny! That's really funny! Do you write your own material? Do you? Because that is so fresh. You are the weakest link goodbye. You know, I've, I've never heard anyone make that joke before. Hmm. You're the first. I've never heard anyone reference, reference that outside the program before. Because that's what she says on the show right? Isn't it? You are the weakest link goodbye. And, and yet you've taken that and used it out of context to insult me in this everyday situation. God what a clever, smart girl you must be, to come up with a joke like that all by yourself. That's so fresh too. Any, any Titanic jokes you want to throw at me too as long as we're hitting these phenomena at the height of their popularity. God you're so funny!

  54. SEEMS RATHER EXPENSIVE!!! by ferrellcat · · Score: 0

    People have been breaking 4.00Ghz for quite a while with a LOT less dough...

    http://www.cpudatabase.com/CPUdb/

  55. Re:How can it get any hotter by David+Horn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Has anyone know about the power (electrical) requirements of this? It's not much good if you're electricity bill is higher than your credit card bill after purchasing it!

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
  56. Naquada gen, eh? by boredMDer · · Score: 2, Funny
    Accessories:
    • Extra keyboard/mouse $50
    • Mousepad $10
    • ZPM $4,000,000,000.50


    Thanks you for shopping Stargate Computers. Please come again.
    1. Re:Naquada gen, eh? by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      Naquada generators are way cheaper and much more plentiful than ZPMs. Though in honor of Windows (and Intel overclocking) stability a naquadria generator might be more appropriate.

      Intel's reserving the ZPMs for Itanium buyers.

  57. Or... by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

    You can build yor own for less than $3000. $2500 is quite a bit to pay for that 5up3r l337 case.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    1. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could just get an AMD FX-53, which is faster for most games, plus not overclocked, plus runs cooler. Anandtech has a top-of-the-line FX-53 system, with 20 inch TFT monitor, excellent speakers and everything else a game geek could want for $3597

    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also include the cost of overclocking the CPU. If they do it gradually, that would take quite a few hours of labour. If they just bump it up right away, they would burn out the odd chip.

  58. Now USE it, game developers! by Entropius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About the only thing that a single blindingly fast processor is good for is gaming. Now, the whole watercooling/Alienware thing strikes me as silly--instead of paying $2000 extra for an overclocked machine, just wait six months and Moore's Law will have caught up.

    But instead of debating that, it's more informative to wonder what all those bogomips would DO in today's games.

    Some people would reply: more frames per second! More varied stuff in those frames! But there's a limit to how much more graphics muscle will improve the gameplay experience in any given game (my Athlon 64 3200+/2GHz machine runs Halflife no better than my Athlon XP 1800+/1.53GHz machine), and there's also a limit to what graphics crunching can do for a game. Doom 3 may be shiny, but by all accounts you could write a game with the same gameplay as Doom 3 (but less prettiness) that would run on a P3/Geforce2.

    I'm ready to see a game that really makes use of modern computers' incredible power for gameplay/AI/physics. How about a version of Homeworld with realistic trajectory modelling of every mass-driver shot, a version of NWN with *real* intelligent AI opponents, or one of a million different ideas for games whose gameplay design, in addition to their graphics, takes into account modern computers.

    NWN did this -- sort of. But it took so long to release (which is a good thing!), and has been a while since release, that modern machines still get bored running its scripting/AI. Hopefully all this will be spiffed up in NWN2.

    1. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      Games developers aren't really interested in dedicating 20% additional effort on game features that 2% of their market can make use of.

      It used to be that 'Game' vendors pushed the envelope. Hell, I remember upgrading from paperwhite to a Color VGA monitor mostly because of Sim Earth.

      Game vendors develop to the center of their market. They have to. Less than 10% of their market is people who are willing to spend $300 to get their $50 game to run properly.

    2. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      I'm ready to see a game that really makes use of modern computers' incredible power for gameplay/AI/physics

      I'd like to see some kind of engineering software (a la The Sims) with which you could design in real-time a portion of a refinery or something. Everything from the steel beam selection for the piperacks to the pump selection to the pipe sizing. And then run the simulation and see what happens.

    3. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      actually, there are other uses for a processor like this, albeit waiting the 6 months does make more sense.

      For example, my MapServer website ... hosted on my home computer. Its an internet mapserving website using open source software, it allows you to surf a map of a gold mining property to view all the exploration work that has been done ... from 10000+ soil samples symbolized by your choice of 32 elements, to hundreds of drill holes, airphotos, geophysics ... 2GB of data in 90+ layers viewable and many of them can be queried leading to more data such as drill sections and assay tables.

      Such a tasty processor would generate maps quicker, allowing more users, and allowing me to do more with my machine while hosting the site.

      PS: ... due to the /. effect, I shall not post my URL.

      There is more to do out there than just waste time playing games.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    4. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by lsmeg · · Score: 1
      Doom 3 may be shiny, but by all accounts you could write a game with the same gameplay as Doom 3 (but less prettiness) that would run on a P3/Geforce2.

      They did. It was called Doom 2.

      --
      It's OK! I'm a limo driver!
    5. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dual/quad/etc CPU machines would be far more economical.. or do like they do in a real server environment, use multiple servers for different tasks (one for web servering, one for database backend, one for storing files, etc).

    6. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      yes indeed, in fact mapserver works great with a postGIS spatial database on a separate server.

      But, for a system such as mine, run at home as a way to make money on the side from my day job, the cheaper system makes sense.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    7. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by theMerovingian · · Score: 1


      Not exactly a refinery, but a similar principle to what you are describing...

      --
      "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    8. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I don't want games that will only run on a P4 3GHz equivalent. I do, however, wish that the non-graphics portions of games would take advantage of at least the power of (say) a Celery 2.4GHz equivalent, rather than a P3 1.2 GHz.

      Besides: Nobody is going to be running Doom 3 well on any machine less than 2 GHz P4 equivalent, unless they go out of their way to put a high-end video card in an old machine. Why does it always have to be graphics that forces people to upgrade?

    9. Re:Now USE it, game developers! by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Thanks, that's pretty neat! To think that millions of people spend hundreds of hours each fussing around with Sim-type, entertainment-only games and don't learn much.

  59. Wait, WHO are you calling a tard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who's willing to spend $4000 on a fucking GAMING MACHINE, seems like the tard to me.

  60. When Duke Nukem Forever is out by MyShinyMetalAss · · Score: 1

    WOW! I will definitely get one of these when Duke Nukem Forever is out....Ofcourse, by then they will sell for $50 on Ebay.

    Imagine the feedback:

    ******SELLER IS A STUPID SCHMOCK. PAID $5,000 FOR THIS PIECE OF CRAP BACK IN 2004******

    --
    This is not an automated signature. I type this in to the bottom of every message.
  61. Re:How can it get any hotter by dave420 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only on /. can a perfectly on-topic post be modded off-topic. I love it.

  62. Alienware = overpriced by brennz · · Score: 1

    Building a performance system is the best option to do it economically. Unfortunately, Alienware has a jump on the market with the dual PCI express graphics motherboards.

    Barring that, I'd buy a system from a company that supports (indirectly or through ads) the OSS community.

    I'm talking about Monarch Computer and similar vendors obviously.

    1. Re:Alienware = overpriced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or support companies that are into things like small size or low noise, because while they charge a premium too, you'll assuredly get more for your money than just an "OMG MAXXD FPS" box. Anyone can build one of those.

      I considered going to ARM Systems for my newest computer, as they offer some silent systems.

      But I decided to go build something myself instead as I wanted to try for both small and quiet - I did sort of succeed at that, as the new system is a "slim desktop," slightly thinner than a mid-tower, and while not silent it's a whole lot more tolerable on the ears than my old computer thanks to a good PSU and A64 Cool 'n Quiet. If ARM had offered something in a slightly smaller size like that I would have jumped on it in an instant.

  63. Re:How can it get any hotter by mikael · · Score: 1

    Has anyone know about the power (electrical) requirements of this? It's not much good if you're electricity bill is higher than your credit card bill after purchasing it!

    On the bright side, your heating bill will be much lower, and with a custom plumbing system, you'll probably be able to eliminate the hot water boiler.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  64. Re:How can it get any hotter by freidog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well it ships with the PC Power and Cooling Turbo Cool 510 (which they naturally list as a 650W supply),

    and considering a nice high end Prescott system can pull on the high side of 300W under full load at stock speeds,

    I'm guessing it isn't pretty. Maybe in the neighborhood of 400W full load; probably a bit less than half of that idle.

  65. So? by billybob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your processor speed it not the biggest bottleneck. I say high quality RAM and a high end graphics card will get you a lot more than a 4Ghz machine. This just seems like a waste of money. Seriously it's more expensive than any of Apple's computers, and that's saying something :)

    --
    Joseph?
  66. NSHelloWorld by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    Some of us write currency convertors, you insensitive clod!

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  67. Keep the cooling, upgrade the processor by FatSean · · Score: 0

    A reliable, turn-key cooling system seems the hard part. Once you have that, you can keep upgrading and overclocking the new gear.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Keep the cooling, upgrade the processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reliable turnkey liquid cooling has been available for sometime. You basically need at 5 parts: pump, hose, waterblock, radiator, and fan . 6 if you want a resevoir, though many pumps have a smal included resevoir. Give someone with the tiniest tech inkling those parts and a block diagram and its a no brainer.

      Water cooling is ridiculously easy. People tend to freak and scream:"What if it leaks?!?!?", but most people underestimate the power of hoseclamps.

      Additionally, water setups last. My Water setup has lasted 4 years with one $40 us pump replaced, basically out of desire, not leakiness or unreliability. My same setup worked like a champ for 2 Athlons and is currently on a P4. Not as cheap, but very close if I had bought a few copper hs/fan combos, and I get much lower temps!

  68. Re:How can it get any hotter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The power supply is 650 watts, which I assume covers everything but the monitor. Since your credit card bill will be at least 4500, that's $7/watt per month. At that rate, a single 75 watt light bulb would run you more than $500/month. If you're faced with that kind of power company (ie you live in California), I would recommend buying your own generators. For less than the price of a single Alienware system, you can generate all the power you need for years.

  69. To say nothing of bringing it on a airplane... by wernst · · Score: 1
    Yes, Liquid Cooling is, if you'll pardon the expression, cool, but it has GOT to be fairly fragile.

    Forget about putting it in your car's back seat and driving to a LAN party -- imagine boxing it up and packing it as luggage or shipping it UPS to a gaming convention? You'd certainly have to drain it, pack it very carefully, unpack it with similar care, check for anything loose with a fine-toothed comb, fill it back up (with the special "magic liquid" no doubt), bleed it (I guess), inspect for leaks, and fix anything that's broken with any tools you may have onhand inside a hotel ballroom.

    No thanks.

    I Think I've save $3000 and build a nice gaming SFF (small form factor) system that, though aircooled and "only" 80% as fast as this liquid-cooled mess, will survive repeated trips on an airplane, either as baggage or checked in as a carry-on bag.

    Oh, wait. I did. Now off to the Aces High 2004 Convention!

  70. Re:Does AlienWare cover warrantee, since Intel won by eht · · Score: 1

    Actually, unless you buy chips in a "retail" box, you don't get a warranty from Intel, you get it from the OEM who provided you the chip.

    Same thing actually goes for tech support for that copy of Windows that comes with most PCs, one of the many reasons OEM licenses are cheaper, Microsoft isn't your tech support contact, the person who sold you your OEM license is.

  71. verbatim quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, the whole story is a verbatim quote from the CNET story. If you're going to steal someone's prose, at least have the decency to use quotation marks.

  72. Ok who is looking for a bitch? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2, Funny


    Buy me this and my ass is yours for life!

    God I want it.

  73. Wow. by juuri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You have incredibly low standards as a consumer. They basically gave you the run around multiple times, lied to you about a rebate, refused fast shipping for some bogus reason and you sat there and accepted it instead of canceling your order and giving money to a company that would treat you well.

    You deserve more when spending so much money.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  74. Great - 4Ghz and internet access still slllooooow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great zook! 4Ghz and the broadband speed is still SLLLLLLOOWWWWWWWW. It's like having a Ferrari and dirt road.

  75. no disrespect to Alienware by SethJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting



    the reason they give that definition of overclocking is because the PR people who made this press release...

    Just curious, but did you notice that the description of overclocking was part of the submitter's description of the story? Supposedly this isn't a press release. But looking back at the history for the submitter, keeleysam, it looks like the account is less than 2 weeks old. Perhaps created simply as a dummy by slashdot in order to post this paid-placement advertorial.

    On the topic of Alienware, I think they are selling a worthy product. There is a niche of gamers / users who want a tweaked machine, but don't have the time or technical prowess to do it themselves. Alienware is targetting that demand quite well.

  76. damn advertisement! by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

    YAY!

    welcome to Slashdot, where blatant brutal advertising is crammed down your throat as if it were some great news story!

    who needs popups and banner ads when the story IS the advertising!

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
  77. quick clarification by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    s/price effective/price effective than buying Alienware's machine/

    No disrespect to your solutions. I'm just getting specific.

  78. Microsoft Taxxing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years back MS sent my business a threatening letter about licenses per user NOT machines. It was filled with all sorts of mean legalese and fines. I ran an art gallery on a single iMac. I called them on it. If this was their idea of first communication, I would NEVER have anything to do with them. So even if you aren't running x86, MS still assumes if you don't have a license, you must be stealing it.

  79. DontbuyformAlien Ware! by syrrys · · Score: 1, Informative

    I used the exact specs of last years Area 51 and built my buddy's PC for $1200 less the AW was charging. That is including the liquid cooling system. The case I bought is almost identical except for the dumb alien design. I dont know why anyone would ever buy a pre fab PC. You can just pay some geeklikemeto put it together for you.

    --
    "Patience is not a virtue, it's a waste of time."
  80. Alienware - Don't buy from them by paulm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Me and some of my friends each bought Alienware computers a couple of years ago. Without fail, each of us had a horrible experience with them.

    The way they assemble things is very shoddy, and they must have some sort of ESD issues at their assembly facility - we all had extremely short lifetimes on motherboards and cpus - usually measured in months.

    These weren't overclocked machines that we purchased, but they were at the time AWs highest end computers.

    To make things worse (much worse!) their support is horrible. It takes 3 transfers to be able to talk to anybody who knows anything about your situation when you are in the middle of a component replacement. Their "on-site" replacement means that they hire out whomever is cheapest in your area to replace the myriad of things which break on their boxes. As a bonus, they continually change who they outsource their support services too, so the quality varies a lot, but it certainly is consistent at the low end.

    One more thing - if you ever even mention, that you might have, at one time, considered getting a linux installation disk anywhere near your AW box, they will instantly refuse to help in anyway, no matter how obvious the hardware problem.

    When it comes to responsibility, they just want to deny, deny, deny.

    Just so you know - I don't now, and never have worked for AW or any of their competitors. I'm just a very unhappy consumer of one of their crappy products. I hate them, and I don't want to see anybody else burned.

    thx.

  81. Re:Don't Forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same logic can be applied to Mac users.
    Stupidity transcends all platforms.

  82. cost by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    and in other news, build a pc from scratch with same equipment for probably, 2500$ max! yes I want fries with that.

  83. It takes me thirty minutes to build a system. by xtal · · Score: 1

    Maybe an hour if you count opening the boxes. More to configure the OS, but I -always- do a fresh install of the OS as I'm sure most other people do to. That's not a lot of additional overhead - I get to cherry pick the best components I want out of the bunch, I know I'm not getting a crap case or power supply, and I know that everything was put together properly.

    I'd argue that it's even faster than digging through third party sites to figure out what's the best buy, what options are available, etc etc etc. I know what I want (hd type, motherboard and video card brand, etc), I order and I'm done.

    As far as warranty hassles go, I haven't had a computer failure in a long, long time. Maybe because I assemble my own gear, using proper grounding straps, with quality components, the first time?

    So I'd argue it's probably a draw if you're proficient at PC building. That "100 bucks" gets used up fast when a crappy motherboard fails, or an application starts crashing because of mystery ram, or the +12 line sags a bit too much under heavy load, or or or or..

    The only glaring exception to this is my powerbook. Notebooks are a little different.. but maybe I'm full of --.. :-)

    --
    ..don't panic
  84. not *phase distortion*! by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    that can really lower your FPS!

  85. Solid economics by AllenChristopher · · Score: 1
    "So I'd argue it's probably a draw if you're proficient at PC building."

    Yeah, prices generally go down with increasing volume. If you build dozens of systems, you spread the initial time investment in figuring out how over all of them. You pick up tricks.

    It remains true that if you only buy computers for yourself once every two years, it isn't worth learning the new RAM naming schemes and such. You won't save more money than you'd otherwise earn with that time.