Slashdot Mirror


Creative Zen Micro Ships Today

SpaFF writes "Today Amazon started shipping the shipping the Zen Micro, Creative's answer to the Ipod-mini and one of several touted 'ipod-killers' due out for the holiday season. Sporting 5GB of space, a form-factor similar to the Ipod-mini, built-in FM radio, and a REMOVABLE battery, the Zen Micro looks quite promising. Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?"

388 comments

  1. Does anyone know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?"

    No. I just heard about it now.

    1. Re:Does anyone know ... by Rei · · Score: 4, Funny

      Zen microchips, eh?

      A monk asked Chao-chou, "Does the microchip have a buddha nature or not?"

      Chao-Chou said, "Mu."

      --
      "Now we're getting to Science -- I love this!" -- Dr. Steven Chu, Energy Secretary confirmation hearings.
    2. Re:Does anyone know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?

      No real customer REALLY cares - face it!! :)

    3. Re:Does anyone know ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chao-Chou must be trilingual.

  2. One of the reasons by Pacifix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    that iPods are so powerful is that it's coupled with the Apple music store. The seamless intergration between reasonable prices and DMR and synching with the iPod is hard to beat. Do any of the new iPod killers have comparable connections to music management software/store? My old MP3 player required MusicMatch, which sucked.

    1. Re:One of the reasons by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      How are things in the Apple PR dept these days?

    2. Re:One of the reasons by aacool · · Score: 1
      I'm almost afraid to post to an Apple thread for fear of the Apple zealots (applets?), but here goes.

      Opinions can be formed one way or another about the convenience of seamless integration to a single source - the same would be called poor design by a software architect. iTunes is a good product though, and I still use it occasionally, although I don't use an iPod. Windows Media Player 10 does the job for me just fine - particularly since I have a variety of media to manage & I especially like the "Sync To List" feature for my Creative. There is also the facility to purchase music from a variety of stores - using hte iTMS-pioneered model of course.

      The iPod design is actually mimicked quite closely by the Creative players, which is not necessarily a bad thing. It will move a few off the iPod platform come Black Friday.

      I personally prefer managing my music on my PC Jukebox only because it's a large screen, and I can design my playlists everyday and have only a few songs - then change them again. That's just me.

      So, the Creative Zen whatever(clonenames) is an able contender to unseat the leader, but not significantly an improvement over any other.

    3. Re:One of the reasons by hackstraw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The seamless intergration between reasonable prices and DMR and synching with the iPod is hard to beat.

      iPod owners must be very wealthy. From the iTunes store it would cost on order of $1,000 to fill up an iPod mini, $5,000 and $10,000 for the iPod 20 and 40 giggers respectively.

    4. Re:One of the reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because as we all know, people never bought records, tapes or CDs before the iPod. I suppose you must be very happy with your 100 MP3 copies each of the 10 CDs you can afford right now.

    5. Re:One of the reasons by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      iPod owners must also just be getting into music, as that assumes that they have no music to put on it in the first place.

    6. Re:One of the reasons by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this apeal is exactly null to people outside the countries served by ITMS. For example Poland. And even if they wanted to sell here, I believe it would still be 0.99eur per song -- I can buy cheaper CDs here, legally.

      No, thanks, I'll keep my 4G MuVo and continue to buy at some other store in the format of my choice.

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    7. Re:One of the reasons by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      Of course, that ignores the fact that the iPod was wildly successful prior to the launch of the iTunes music store. That was just the final icing on the cake.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    8. Re:One of the reasons by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      500 hours of music will cost much more in the form of 500 CDs, and it's guaranteed you won't care for much (most?) of it. On the plus side though, you do get something more tangible than a license to listen from buying a CD, and it can be resold afterwards.

    9. Re:One of the reasons by Damek · · Score: 1

      No, it's not the music store. iPod was popular before the music store. It's iTunes itself. The killer app for organizing your music. Nobody does it better or simpler. iPod sales went up when iTunes hit Windows, didn't they?

    10. Re:One of the reasons by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we all know iPod buys have never bought a CD before in their lives... "Oh where EVER shall I find some music?"

      I have about 100 CD's and that's really not a lot... even my grandma has that many and she hardly buys them that often. So both of us can fill a Mini without even getting our whole library on them nor buying a single song from iTMS.

      I remember hearing about half the sales on iTMS were albums... so CLEARLY internet downloads aren't killing the album. However... that means for every whole CD bought off iTMS with 10 - 15 songs on it... there were 10 - 15 x as many people buying only singles. That's where my purchases have been, one hit wonders and songs I've heard years ago and can't find in stores. The album I bought I already own on tape, but it seems to have never been re-released on CD. Still I've bought more "albums" than singles. Anyways... less than $20 on the store, and I could fill a Mini no sweat. Hardly rich.

      -Don.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    11. Re:One of the reasons by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      I believe the Creative players support copy-protected WMA which is the format sold by many online music stores like MSN, Walmart, AOL Pressplay, etc.

    12. Re:One of the reasons by danger_boy_13 · · Score: 1

      Allofmp3 is a great store with no DRM and a CD is less than a track from iTMS. Forget iTunes, I'll stick with Russia.

    13. Re:One of the reasons by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Personally, I call iTMS icing because iPod takes MP3s too. I just copy all of my audio to it, and for the music that I can't justify the entire CD, I could just buy onesies of the tracks I like but don't own to supplement the collection.

      I don't have an iPod yet.

    14. Re:One of the reasons by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Maybe Microsoft's Windows Media player music store.

      Its improving and the next version with player version 11 supposed to match and even surpasses Apple's music store with video's as well as wma's.

    15. Re:One of the reasons by neves · · Score: 1

      I don't have an ipod, but my CD collection is worth more than my car.

  3. Cant post anything constructive by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am completely mesmerized by the mesmerizing blue backlight glow.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Cant post anything constructive by Hoplite3 · · Score: 1

      Off topic? Did the moderator follow the link? Check out the picture on Creative's site. I thought the selling of the blue back light was just too funny. I mean, what the hell? I'm going to throw out my old yellow backlit device and upgrate to the new blue one. Why? Because I'm mesmerized . If this is Creative's marketing department at their best, this thing won't kill the ipod, it won't even kill dead people.

      --
      Use the Firehose to mod down Second Life stories!
    2. Re:Cant post anything constructive by tashanna · · Score: 2, Funny
      I am completely mesmerized by the mesmerizing blue backlight glow.
      Repeat after me, we are all individuals
      I'm not!
    3. Re:Cant post anything constructive by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It's really hard to kill dead people.

      Because they, like..., um..., already dead?

    4. Re:Cant post anything constructive by parkrrrr · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, it's "curved to fit." What it fits, well... I think the last time I saw that phrase used to sell something, it was a feminine hygeine commercial.

    5. Re:Cant post anything constructive by teknokracy · · Score: 1

      Still, it isn't as good as a "mysterious hidden LED"!

      http://www.coolermaster.com/index.php?LT=english&L anguage_s=2&url_place=product&p_serial=DDF-S81-U1& other_title=DDF-S81-U1Dual%20Storm&PHPSESSID=2f891 a52b7b2c9a28534f1344130082f

    6. Re:Cant post anything constructive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, the whole "eye-candy over substance" is Apple's M.O. and you're ragging on Creative?!

  4. OggVorbis Support? by dfn5 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?

    More importantly, does it work with OggVorbis? Apparently not. :-(

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:OggVorbis Support? by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More importantly, does it work with OggVorbis? Apparently not. :-(

      Why is everyone so excited about OGG? Just because it's free? I have never (and likely will never) use OGG but I don't see why every player that is mentioned on Slashdot has to have several comments modded up that mentions the inclusion or lack of OGG support.

      Convert the OGG to MP3 or to some other format that the player uses and be done with it. I just can't believe that because the player is missing a basically unused format (for the non-geeks) that it is somehow "bad".

    2. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use OggVorbis for ripping all my CDs, and if you had any clue whatsoever, you'd know that OggVorbis does a better job of encoding than MP3 (especially at lower bitrates)

      Hate to break it to you, but MP3 is so outclassed by WMA and OggVorbis that it's perfectly reasonable that people look for these in players.

    3. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Xeo+024 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Why waste the time for OggVorbis support? So that the 0.0005% consumers who use it can be happy?

    4. Re:OggVorbis Support? by diakka · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Convert the OGG to MP3 or to some other format that the player uses and be done with it. I just can't believe that because the player is missing a basically unused format (for the non-geeks) that it is somehow "bad".
      Well, belive it. I personally encode all my CDs as ogg or flac and so support for ogg format is the first thing I check for when I look at these types of products. If a company doesn't support ogg, then they're writing off me and others like me who aren't willing to compromise. It doesn't really matter if you understand why all us crazy geeks like ogg, but if you're a company making portable music devices and want our business, you damn well better know that we do in fact want it.
      --
      -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
    5. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      I work at Creative Technology in the HD based MP3 player developement department. There WILL be Ogg Vorbis support, it is definitely being worked on. No timeline yet though.

    6. Re:OggVorbis Support? by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't really matter if you understand why all us crazy geeks like ogg, but if you're a company making portable music devices and want our business, you damn well better know that we do in fact want it.

      See, that's the problem. I don't use OGG because it's a worthless format (the same with MP3, etc). I perfer SHN/FLAC. Do I complain that very few players support SHN/FLAC playback? No. Is it my #1 priority when I am looking for a portable music device? No.

      Covert between the two.

      You can't have all the formats you want and inexpensive pricing. It just doesn't work like that.

    7. Re:OggVorbis Support? by pgrst · · Score: 1
      Well, belive it. I personally encode all my CDs as ogg or flac and so support for ogg format is the first thing I check for when I look at these types of products. If a company doesn't support ogg, then they're writing off me and others like me who aren't willing to compromise. It doesn't really matter if you understand why all us crazy geeks like ogg, but if you're a company making portable music devices and want our business, you damn well better know that we do in fact want it.


      Why would a company support a format that only 0.0001% of users have even heard of?

      there is nothing overly impressive about ogg vorbis. There are codecs that are more efficient and popular. The only thing going for ogg vorbis is the open source aspect. but just because software is open source doesn't automatically make it worth using
    8. Re:OggVorbis Support? by pdjohe · · Score: 1

      I definately agree that besides disk space and battery, file format can be a big plus to compete with iPods. With the new 4th Gen. iPods and mini iPods supporting a compressed lossless file type for audiophiles (Apple lossless), it seems to have an advantage over the only lossless file type on these new Zen Micros (wav). I couldn't find anywhere on Creative's website that said they support variable-bitrate MP3s, but I imagine it does. Anyone know?

      But I am disappointed in both players for not supporting Ogg formats.

      Also, the user interface on the Zen Micros does not seem up to scratch with the iPod either. The display graphics seem like an iPod display copy attempt. The buttons don't seem as simple as on the iPod and you just can't beat that iPod scroll-wheel!

    9. Re:OggVorbis Support? by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because you can't (legally) rip to MP3 with Free software?

      Is there a Fraunhoffer blessed Open Source implementation of MP3 ripping?

    10. Re:OggVorbis Support? by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, but you bitch about more crap on /. than I do and that is saying something.

      You sound like you need a drink and/or need to get laid. ;->

    11. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, someone who actually has a brain!

      now if everyone only knew that ripping mp3s with non-royalty paid mp3 encoders isn't exactly legal, we'd all be better off

    12. Re:OggVorbis Support? by sokoban · · Score: 1

      I use the Apple lossless on my iPod. It works really well, and tends to save me a few megs per concert/album over FLAC/SHN. What someone really needs to do though is make a better FLAC/SHN transcoder for Mac OS. Having to convert to AIFF really sucks up HD space with iTunes tendency to make copies of music the first tiem it is played. I wish I could open FLACs in iTunes and convert them straight to ALAC.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    13. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Pleione · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You'll be missing out then. OGG is fine, but I'll be sticking to MP3 and MP3 Pro for the forseeable future. Regardless of what anyone thinks of those formats, they are the defacto standard, supported by everything and offer good compression with good sound quality. Quite frankly, I don't see what's in the hype of OGG's supposedly having better sound quality. In my opinion, MP3's have better sound quality with less tinniness.

    14. Re:OggVorbis Support? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone so excited about OGG? Just because it's free?

      Well, if you ever switch to a Mac, kiss goodbye to your WMAs and if you go to Linux M4Ps will not play either. Sure there will be illegal hacks, but not for just-released updates to the codec or in mainstream distributions. And if Microsoft ever abandons windows media, well tough luck on your new Longhorn 2010 PC!
      mp3s are better, but you are still infringing on patents unless you buy a commercial jukebox.

      Now with OGG, you are guaranteed to be able to listen to your tunes on any future PC/PDA/cell phone. As for dedicated devices , chances are they will have support available through a downloadable upgrade.

      Besides, Vobris is designed so that big changes to the encoder can be made without breaking existing players. So you are likely to have much better sound quality on your old portable player without spending any more money on hardware.

      Personally I just use AAC and count on those illegal hacks. But then I like to listen to new music every year. Your millage can definitely vary.

    15. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one question about support of Ogg.

      I'm still debating on ripping my CD collection to Ogg format but I wonder if it will ever be supported by any portable device. Please correct me if I am wrong.

      Ogg has a number system from for quality because they are continually developing better and better compression techniques. Does this mean a device that supported Ogg would need updates to keep up with the Ogg format?

      What I mean is would a person that bought a device today be able to play Ogg files 2 years from now when the Ogg files are compressed better?

      I'm just curious since I'm looking into Ogg but if no players ever support it then what would be the point.

    16. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the real question is "why not thow OGG in just for the heck of it?" I mean, without the MPEG et al licencing fees, wouldn't it be pretty simple to add an open codec to these things? (I am not an engineer...)

    17. Re:OggVorbis Support? by legirons · · Score: 1

      "More importantly, does it work with OggVorbis? Apparently not."

      I have the Zen (non-mini) if that gives any indication of past performance, and it seems to like MP3s.

      Although with Creative's usual multi-gigabyte driver for this, you'd imagine that it would offer more features than just "copy MP3s, unreliably"

      Don't expect to syncronise between machines (only one license to install the driver on one machine), or to synchronise with anything not running Windows.

    18. Re:OggVorbis Support? by diamondsw · · Score: 1

      And the point being made was that this market segment is not large enough to justify inclusion by the highest volume players.

      The only way I see that changing is if the chips these players are based on started to support Ogg. Then the manufacturers could add it for "free", and the size of the market would be irrelevant.

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    19. Re:OggVorbis Support? by geg81 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why is everyone so excited about OGG? Just because it's free?

      It's better in practice than MP3. But, yes, the main reason is because it's free. With something like MP3, you end up not being in control of content you paid for.

      Convert the OGG to MP3 or to some other format that the player uses.

      Both Ogg and MP3 are lossy formats; every time you convert, the quality goes down audibly.

      and be done with it

      No, it is companies that should just implement Ogg "and be done with it". It doesn't cost them anything to license, it works well, and they even get an integer codec for embdded systems.

      I just can't believe that because the player is missing a basically unused format (for the non-geeks) that it is somehow "bad".

      Well, you better believe it. If a player is Ogg-based, it also means that non-geeks get bette choices for converting their audio collections.

    20. Re:OggVorbis Support? by kwalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Personally, I prefer Ogg Vorbis over MP3 for several reasons.

      1. Bit for bit, it sounds better so I have a choice of the same sound quality for a lower bitrate (More songs per MB on my flash-based player) or better sound quality. Its psycho-acoustic model beats the pants off of MP3. Yeah, it's not lossless like FLAC is, but I can detect no audible artifacts no matter what system I play it through.
      2. It isn't locked down, patented, proprietary, or otherwise encumbered. It doesn't live or die with the whims of its parent company. It is free for anyone to use (BSD-licensed) and I'm not required by law to tip the parent company anything per rip I make. It's fully documented with reference code available for just about everything capable of processing a digital data stream.
      3. It is flexible and powerful. It supports arbitrary data encoded into the stream so things like lyrics, URLs, album art, etc. can be encoded into the stream, and anything that can play Ogg can understand them. Bitrates can go from 0 (silence) to over 300. Compare that with MP3 players that show unusually long play times for files with ID3v2 tags at the beginning and play garbage sound for the first second or so as it spins through the album art, or those that play silence as the song flies by at 5x normal speed.
      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    21. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why is everyone so excited about OGG? Just because it's free? I have never (and likely will never) use OGG but I don't see why every player that is mentioned on Slashdot has to have several comments modded up that mentions the inclusion or lack of OGG support."

      Well it's kinda like a browser with no PNG support - inconvenient if you've become used to using the free format, and no less easy to program support for than the patent-emcumbered formats

    22. Re:OggVorbis Support? by legirons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Why waste the time for OggVorbis support? So that the 0.0005% consumers who use it can be happy?"

      Ok, go ask 200000 people about their preferred music format, and if even two of them say OGG, you're lying.

    23. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a company doesn't support ogg, then they're writing off me and others like me who aren't willing to compromise.

      Yes, they are, and they don't care. I don't care either. Only you care, and because of it you don't get to enjoy more than one or two crappy digital music players. ...if you're a company making portable music devices and want our business, you damn well better...

      They don't want your business. There's only three of you...

    24. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's this kind of defeatist attitude that resulted in the election of that fucking dimwit of a prenit that you yanks have. Had to slip that in there, sorry. I feel better now.

      People want ogg support because it's unencumbered by patents. This is a good thing for the media player companies because they can provide this format and not have to pay royalties to some bunch of know nothing suits and their cabal of patent lawyers.

      I also want ogg support because I have 30GB worth of music ripped and the thought of going back and doing it all over again is not terribly high up there on my list of things I want to do.

    25. Re:OggVorbis Support? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's important.

      YOU FOOL! Don't you see the mesmerizing blue backlight? Who cares about OGG when you've got the mesmerizing blue backlight?

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    26. Re:OggVorbis Support? by anethema · · Score: 1

      Try this. DONT rip to ogg. You will have to settle for a piss poor mp3 player.

      If you are worried about quality..rip to flac and encode the files to mp3 that you want to put on the player.

      I cant think of a single good reason you'd want to rip to ogg..just shooting yourself in the foot.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    27. Re:OggVorbis Support? by stuuf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The difference between geeks and non-geeks is that the non-geeks will just use stuff that's more popular (iPod, MP3) but geeks actually car about which product is better. Most of the people pleading for Vorbis* support are probably doing so because it sounds better than MP3, especially at low bitrates, which is useful on portable devices.

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    28. Re:OggVorbis Support? by geekBass · · Score: 1

      A major point that people forget about using ogg on portable players is that ogg decoding requires more processing power which translates to less battery life per charge. I love ogg for various reasons that due to this reason I stopped using it even though my player supports it.

    29. Re:OggVorbis Support? by gears5665 · · Score: 1

      worthless

      That's one opinion. Another that MP3 and OGG serve a purpose by making virtually similar music available in smaller sizes.

      And, like Debian, support for OGG is support for Open Standards and the GNU way of doing things. Not everything has to be a philosophical debate, but when you have the choice between doing "right" and doing "normal", I hope that you choose "right" when all other things are equal to "normal".

    30. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      That is a perfectly valid conclusion. However, I have an in-dash MP3 player, and just as I have converted my CDs to MP3 files, it's equally possible that I rip to Ogg or Flac. If a player doesn't support my preferred format, I convert to the format the player uses, and when I'm at home, my computer, and my entertainment center plays them all.

      It's the same idea of back when Cassette tapes were the only way to mix tracks from CDs. Until multi-format players become the majority, you're probably best served by pandering to the current players - your originals can stay however you want them.

      So make your playlist, copy the files to a temporary directory, run a batch conversion over them, and be done with it. Ogg will be supported eventually, but for now, The Industry has deemed it either too difficult, intensive, or unprofitable to support. It's ok, things change.

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    31. Re:OggVorbis Support? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Why Ogg is good:

      1) It sounds better. Just use your ears, it achieves transparency at the lowest bitrate of any lossy format, and sounds better at non-transparent bitrates.
      2) It's free. The inclusion of Vorbis support in a portable doesn't cost the developer any more than the actual cost of implementation. No licensing issues, no patents, no hassle.

      Personally, I rip all of my music to my computer in lossless FLAC format. Why not, I have a 250 GB hard drive. =D From there I can transcode it to whatever I need for portable use or internet distribution (before you ask, it's my band's music). For portable I choose Vorbis, you just get more bang for your bitrate. For internet I do both a VBR MP3 and a Vorbis file, for universal compatibility and sound quality respectively.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    32. Re:OggVorbis Support? by PsychoKiller · · Score: 1

      Ever play UT2004?

      GamesThatUseVorbis

    33. Re:OggVorbis Support? by thegnu · · Score: 1

      You can't have all the formats you want and inexpensive pricing. It just doesn't work like that.

      Yes, it does. There is no argument against including ogg support. THE CODEC IS FREE. OGGs compress higher quality at lower bitrate.

      Also, it's extremely reasonable for a consumer to choose to boycott (eg, not buy) a product if it doesn't provide an essential feature to said consumer.

      --
      Please stop stalking me, bro.
    34. Re:OggVorbis Support? by karnal · · Score: 1

      It's Fridayyyy and I am tired...

      Bitrates can go from 0 (silence) to over 300.

      If your bitrate is 0, you're effectively paused, right?

      Oh well, I laughed at it....

      --
      Karnal
    35. Re:OggVorbis Support? by ryanmfw · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear you man. The same thing happened with my leaded gas stockpile. I bought 50,000 gallons of leaded gas back in the 70's. Now, most cars don't support leaded gas, which is the first think I check for when I look at these types of products. If a car doesn't support leaded gas, then they're writing off me and others like me who aren't willing to compromise. It doesn't really matter if you understand why all us crazy gas buyres like leaded gas, but if you're a company making cars and want our business, you damn well better know that we do in fact want it.

      --
      Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
    36. Re:OggVorbis Support? by garote · · Score: 1
      Personally, I prefer Apple's M4A over MP3 for several reasons:
      1. Bit for bit, it sounds better so I have a choice of the same sound quality for a lower bitrate or better sound quality. Its psycho-acoustic model beats the pants off of MP3. Yeah, it's not lossless like FLAC is, but I can detect no audible artifacts no matter what system I play it through.
      2. It is, in fact, AAC wrapped in the MPEG-4 format wrapper. It doesn't live or die with the whims of its parent company. It is free for anyone to use and I'm not required by law to tip the parent company anything per rip I make. It's fully documented with reference code available for just about everything capable of processing a digital data stream.
      3. It is flexible and powerful. It supports arbitrary data encoded into the stream so things like lyrics, URLs, album art, etc. can be encoded into the stream, and anything that can play MPEG4 can understand them. In fact, the MPEG4 encapsulation protocol allows you to wrap ANYTHING into an MPEG4 stream, audio, video, or otherwse, from any codec. Bitrates can go from 0 (silence) to whatever the hell you want. Compare that with MP3 players that show unusually long play times for files with ID3v2 tags at the beginning and play garbage sound for the first second or so as it spins through the album art, or those that play silence as the song flies by at 5x normal speed.
      My point being, OGG is not impressive for any of your stated reasons. MP3 has been around for about ten years and everyone has moved on since then.
    37. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to Monkey's Audio/APE? There's a free lossless audio codec, up for grabs for any interested manufacturer...

      And a distinct runner-up to Ogg Vorbis in the naming department ;-)

    38. Re:OggVorbis Support? by grmoc · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to distribute software that has mp3 capabilities without a license from the Franhaufer guys (regardless of who wrote it).

      OGG is freely distributable, has arguably superior compression for the same sound quality.

      Furthermore, some important Linux distros don't include mp3 support at all, but they do support OGG (for the aforementioned reason).

      When I rip anything, I ripp to ogg. It saves space, it plays just as well, and I don't have to feel guilty about breaking the law.

    39. Re:OggVorbis Support? by grmoc · · Score: 2, Insightful



      Lossy compression methods are worthless? I think many disagree with that sentiment.

      As for inexpensive pricing with my formats of choice.. Why not?

      The source for FLAC and OGG is freely and legally available for download on the web, and I believe it is legal to incorporate it into your product... So the barrier to entry for these things should be pretty low.

    40. Re:OggVorbis Support? by demi · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those people who ripped their music collection to mp3s. Then, I got more educated, and re-ripped it to oggs (whew!). And now, I'm more educated and I realize that if only I can scrape together the time (and money to buy a disk--but frankly disk isn't that expensive these days) to rip to FLAC that'll the last time I'll have to do it.

      I really wish there were a clearinghouse for hardware supporting ogg vorbis linked to from xiph.org or somewhere. I want to shop for mp3 players but I don't want to have to click through every description to see which support Ogg.

      Or maybe someone can just tell me: I want a cheap, very small, preferably flash player that supports oggs, and that I can load using any OS (not just Linux) because it shows up as a USB drive and I pop the oggs on?

      --
      demi
    41. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Syriloth · · Score: 1

      You can't have all the formats you want and inexpensive pricing. It just doesn't work like that.

      The Rio Karma plays Mp3, Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, and WMA out of the box, and costs $279. And despite complaints about its fragility, I at least have never had problems with it, despite it being in my pocket with me while I'm running, biking, and generally doing everything that I do. I highly reccomend it.

    42. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Post translated:

      "I don't like/understand OGG. Plz m0d uP!"

    43. Re:OggVorbis Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ogg STILL sounds better than AAC at the same bitrate, and is a completely OPEN codec. Absolutely no DRM bullshit, patents, licensing fees, etc..

    44. Re:OggVorbis Support? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      I believe the iRiver iFP-800 and possibly the 700 series portables can work as USB mass storage devices with a firmware upgrade.

      It really is worth it ripping to FLAC. If you want to put something on a portable, just encode yourself an MP3 or OGG. Too big? Just lower the bitrate you used. No worrying about transcoding artifacts.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    45. Re:OggVorbis Support? by demi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip! The iRiver iFP series you mention do look promising, but as I read their FAQ, even if you use it to store arbitrary files, according to them you need their Music Manager software or whatever to load music files--I'm guessing there's some kind of index or something that's loaded into the device with the files themselves? That is, my best guess is I could take one of these devices and put ogg files on it, but it wouldn't recognize and play them. And then, of course, if a firmware upgrade is required, how do I do that without Windows or MacOS?

      I suppose I should find a retailer with a good return policy and just try it out myself.

      --
      demi
    46. Re:OggVorbis Support? by demi · · Score: 1

      After some research, it seems the story is this:

      The firmware you describe (that allows the mp3 player to operate as a mass storage device) is not available for the 800 and 900 series. It is available for the 100 and 300 series (300 seems to be discontinued) but doesn't support Oggs.

      --
      demi
    47. Re:OggVorbis Support? by demi · · Score: 1

      I should also mention that without the UMS firmware, there is a Linux program to load music onto the iRiver iFP players.

      --
      demi
    48. Re:OggVorbis Support? by demi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Okay, I promise this will be my last reply. I now have an iRiver iFP 790T and it's pretty much what I want. It doesn't have UMS firmware, but the iFP Linux driver works fine (it's not really just for Linux, it works on several platforms, including OpenBSD, which is what I'm using.

      --
      demi
    49. Re:OggVorbis Support? by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Good to see it's working out for you. Happy listening.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
  5. More info... by elid · · Score: 4, Informative
  6. Other formats? by sp00 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?
    If it did support linux, maybe it also would supports OGG. This would be an appreciated feature. This review says nothing about OGG it's support for OGG. Anyone know if it actually does support it?

    1. Re:Other formats? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Whoops, forgot to mention this in my earlier post "Linux Support Confirmed". The device does support OGG and according to the docs, the KDE based utility that ships with it will do mp3 to OGG conversion when you copy to the device.

  7. It's kind of ugly.. by mrseigen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not as bad as the mini Dell DJ, but part of the appeal of the iPod is, the simple and minimal appearance. This thing looks like a sci-fi explosion, like most MP3 players these days.

    The battery life is a bit worse, too.

    1. Re:It's kind of ugly.. by Walkiry · · Score: 1

      >This thing looks like a sci-fi explosion ...

      It does? It's got 6 buttons and a screen, and that's it. Hell, it could pass as a mobile phone if you're not careful.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:It's kind of ugly.. by Archimonde · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. It looks really nice.

      It's subjective thing you know...

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    3. Re:It's kind of ugly.. by LiquidHAL · · Score: 1

      [quote]The battery life is a bit worse, too.[/quote] watchu talkin bout It says right there in the pcmag article, claimed battery life is for hours MORE than the iPod mini. I think people are really searching for things to fault this player.

    4. Re:It's kind of ugly.. by LiquidHAL · · Score: 1

      oops with the [quote]. Should have previewed, i always forget that this uses HTML.

    5. Re:It's kind of ugly.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U'r UghL33!!

  8. Ummm by MoneyT · · Score: 0

    Which button do I press to make a selection?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    1. Re:Ummm by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      Just tap on the scroll pad. Like you do with a laptop touch pad to 'click"

    2. Re:Ummm by benson+hedges · · Score: 1

      you see that large button in the bottom middle of the input field? that's actually a touchpad. you scroll on it like you would move a cursor with a laptop touchpad, and press it to make a selection. the folks who created this touchpad are the same who built the touchwheel for apple, by the way.

      --
      Karma : Soylent Green (Mostly due to eating junk food and mocking religion)
  9. What's up with the ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First it was all the viral marketing. Now we're just getting straight up ads? With referral links to benefit the poster? What happened Slashdot?

    1. Re:What's up with the ads? by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Not sure if its just me, but in the last few days my FireFox adblock has been letting all the Slashdot ads through.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  10. Killer? hardly by BlowChunx · · Score: 0, Troll

    1) FM radio? That will hardly drive sales...if there was anything to listen to on FM, XM and Sirius wouldn't have a business plan.

    2) Removable battery? That is what is supposed to kill the iPod? Huhn? How about UI? Is that any good? How do I sync it to my music Library? Historically Creative sucks at this kind of thing...

    3) Sure isn't competing on price.

  11. Zen Xtra works with Linux by severett · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes I know it's not the same product. :)

    I do want to report that my Nomad Zen Xtra Jukebox works great with Linux if you use the the gnomad2 program.

    Gnomad might work just as well with this product.

    1. Re:Zen Xtra works with Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a second I thought you said "gonad2 program".

    2. Re:Zen Xtra works with Linux by legirons · · Score: 1

      "I do want to report that my Nomad Zen Xtra Jukebox works great with Linux if you use the the gnomad2 program."

      sudo apt-get install gnomad2
      Password:
      Reading Package Lists... Done
      Building Dependency Tree... Done
      E: Couldn't find package gnomad2

      I also seem to remember that it wouldn't compile on Mandrake 9 or Mandrake 10. Is there a trick to installing it?

    3. Re:Zen Xtra works with Linux by tomwhore · · Score: 1

      Gnomad and Neutrino make my life very very happy.

      Im also happy not to be a iTunes luser, folks who pretty much take pride in being a pseudo hip WalMart generation.

      Why is it that Slashdot became a bastion of mindeless consumer stupidity, of folks who wont use PGP becuase its not easy enough or even vote because they would have to gat thier asses off thier couch or out of a hip bar for a few hours?

      Zen Nomad Xtra....Think Differnt...For Real

      --
      Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
    4. Re:Zen Xtra works with Linux by dgb2n · · Score: 1

      I do want to report that my Nomad Zen Xtra Jukebox works great with Linux if you use the the gnomad2 program.

      Am I the only one who read this as Gonad2.

      Its Friday, what do you want?

    5. Re:Zen Xtra works with Linux by severett · · Score: 1

      No trick.

      I'm using Slackware9.1 and installed it from source. Just make sure you have the needed Nomad filesystem libraries installed on your system. I don't remember having to do anything too unusual to make it run.

      If you're really stuck contact me via support at the above website and I'll do what I can.

  12. Re:iPod killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's such a thing as an iPod mini you know...

  13. Library Considerations by mudpyr8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All these different portable players are great, but how do we deal with our libraries? My library is fully managed by iTunes, but is primarily MP3 (I don't import using AAC).

    If each of these comes out expecting people to use their software, how is that good? With 30GB of music its worth it to me to NOT mess with moving my library to another software package.

    I think choice is great, and I think this looks like a snazzy product, but I think companies have to consider the inertia involved with moving a library, especially if the expectation is to convert it to a new format. What is that worth, and does Apple offer an SDK for iTunes?

    1. Re:Library Considerations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple does offer portable players an iTunes plug-in SDK -- but only for the Macintosh.

    2. Re:Library Considerations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because iTunes sucks.
      get over it.

    3. Re:Library Considerations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also converted hundreds upon hundreds of CDs to MP3 via iTunes. Fortunately, the Creative MuVo TX FM (256MB, flash-based) plays nice with iTunes because of its USB conection (or so a Linux user has written on the Net).

      Obviously not the same as gigs of storage, but I don't see a reason for carrying 100 CDs in my back pocket. Give me a few hours of unrepeating tunes and I'm happy. I'll reload a new batch when I get home.

    4. Re:Library Considerations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't really need an SDK to convert an iTunes library. The folder structure is pretty simple -- iTunes Music > Artist > Album > music files. Better yet, the whole database is available in XML. iTunes keeps its own binary format too, but in the iTunes music folder you can parse iTunes Music Library.xml to your heart's content. It contains all the metadata, including the file location as a file:// url.

      So there is really nothing stopping anyone from writing a simple conversion tool.

    5. Re:Library Considerations by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a Zen Xtra, so I assume that they work about the same. You have to use their software, but if you have some mp3s with id2/3 tags just drag them to the device and that's it. You don't have to move your library anywhere.

    6. Re:Library Considerations by NRP128 · · Score: 1

      Well put. Whoever made the comment about most of the value being in teh free software hit the nail on the head. iTunes is worlds better than any other management software i've found, even the WinAmp plugins that claim to update your iPod. Plus with ephpod, and OutPod i'm now getting most of the mac-functionality (probably to the bane of Apple) from my iPod. I have a Palm Zire i use to keep all my contacts, dates, etc, and it's nice to scribble a note on it, but my iPod goes with me in places that my Palm never will, so i like the thought that i have my entire collection of phone numbers and email addresses just about everywhere i go, plus a summary of mine and my girlfriends class schedules, along with the more significant dates tucked away in my pocket. Before i bought mine i looked at every viable option, both promised and existing (including all the iPod killers and mini-pod killers), but found none that compared. I have my complaints about iPod, such as lack of native calendar and datebook support for windows machines, which i've already taking a raping on here complaining about before, so save yourself. my 4G also locks up randomly, still an unexplained phenomea, and i expected more frequent software updates than what apple has been providing, but oh well. Point: there are few MP3 players that can beat the 'pods in convienence and functionality. Personally it was no contest.

  14. Re:iPod killer? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is made to compete with the iPod Mini, which only has 4Gb of storage space...so it's actually larger in terms of storage space. Both products cost $250 and come in similar sizes.

  15. Re:iPod killer? by RandoX · · Score: 1

    I think iPod mini killer may have been more appropriate.

  16. No OGG. Again... by noovi · · Score: 0, Troll

    No OGG support. Again. Fuck it. Wake up Creative!

    1. Re:No OGG. Again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly...OGG - Fuck it.
      Nobody uses that piece of shit encoding because it fucking sucks. So STFU and go back to your "standards-based" world of OGG, CSS, and whatever else you fucktards like to come up with while whacking it in your mother's basement.

  17. Linux? Doubtful. by swngnmonk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    None of Creative's players work well (or much at all) with Linux. Over the years, there have been a couple of OSS attempts, but none with the help of the folks at Creative.

    My emailed pleadings/complaints to Creative have always been answered with something to the effect of "We don't support Linux, we don't care to put in the resources, and we won't share the inner workings with you. Thanks for considering our product."

    Needless to say, I no longer consider them a company worth supporting.

    --

    'ARRGH! Pirate Designers of the Internet, we be!'

  18. recording! by redherring22 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    you forgot the most important part, at least to quasi-musicians like myself who are looking for an easy way to record band practices without having to set up my laptop- line-in recording! unlike the ipod's intentionally crippled recording features, the zen micro looks like it will record to any bitrate of mp3. i know people who are still buying minidisc recorders for this purpose at well over $200 / pop-- with the zen micro 512MB costing around $120 (last I checked) I am SERIOUSLY tempted to pick one up even though I already own a 40GB ipod!

    1. Re:recording! by redherring22 · · Score: 1

      crap, i'm sorry, i'm confusing Zen with MuVo, which is the tiny flash-based one that I'm really thinking of buying. link. homercles has no interest in the zen micro.

    2. Re:recording! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know, I've been thinking about buying that as well, as it's rumored to have undocumented support for itunes (like many previous Creative devices), boasts what I feel to be a more reasonable price point for a portable audio device, as the parent mentions, and records, which means I can FINALLY ebay my miniDisc player. But I can't find ANY info ANYWHERE about the line-in recording. The fact that it has a line-in would make you think it can record at a reasonable bitrate, but Creative doesn't publish any stats that I can find on this. Moreover, they dub this feature "voice recording," which is a very very bad sign, as that is generally a euphimism for "audio quality as bad or worse then that of a payphone." If that line-in made it analagous to a miniDisc player's robust recording features, don't you think they'd say so somewhere? Personally, I'll keep my eyes on it, but I'm waiting for an independent reviewer to actually get their hands on the device and tell me what it really does. If anyone has seen such a review, please please hit us with a link.

    3. Re:recording! by I_Love_My_Mac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude... it's a f***ing music PLAYER, not a music recorder... all you people who whine that it doesn't do some specific recording, etc... go out and buy a device meant to record music with. It's not intentionally crippled, it's just not the main purpose of the iPod... Especially as a musician, I imagine sound quality matters to you, in which case, you'd probably be best off buying a DAT deck or something and a decent microphone. And while I'm on my rant here... why exactly would you say it's "intentionally crippled"? You imply that the Ipod has this amazing recording capability, but some evil, twisted bastard at Apple, while twisting his mustache in a maniacal manner, decided to cripple this amazing feature because... well... you know they have to protect their sales of Apple-branded tape-recorders. How about the player is meant to play music easily... not have 50 features which 1% of the people will use while confusing the rest of the users. get a grip you freakin' idiot....

    4. Re:recording! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would he want to spend hundreds of dollars on equipment just to record band practice? also, where does it say it is a music player and not a recorder?

      P.S. ur gay

      HAHAHA

  19. Re:iPod killer? by mccalli · · Score: 5, Interesting
    So it's an iPod killer with, at most, one-third the storage space.

    iPod Mini killer. Minis have 4Gig, this has 5Gig.

    I have an original iPod, the 5Gig model. At the time, it was sold as 1000 songs in your pocket. I can't help noticing that this same device is advertising 2,500 songs. So, err...bit rate? I think they're claiming a little too much for themselves.

    To be fair, at 128kbps MP3 VBR I got more than 1k tracks on mine. But the 1k is realistic if you use 192 MP3 or AAC at 160.

    The Zen thing looks ugly, but it does have an FM radio. I do wish Apple would do that instead of mucking about with photos. It's an audio device first - please concentrate on the audio.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  20. One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by blueZ3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    REMOVABLE, rechargable battery.

    It'd be cool to have two batteries on a long bike trip and just be able to pop in a fresh one when the first one died.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      Or you could buy the iPod bicycle charger here.

    2. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by pi+radians · · Score: 1
      It'd be cool to have two batteries on a long bike trip and just be able to pop in a fresh one when the first one died.
      Have you considered something like this?
      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    3. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah if you wanna be a fag

    4. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by Holi · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough following your link showed no such product. In fact even looking around I could not find an iPod bicycle recharger.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    5. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the left, about halfway down. They sold out of all colors except pink.

    6. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by Holi · · Score: 1

      Your talking about the malware bike mount?
      Not a charger. There is nothing on thinkdifferent.com nor that I could find on a google search about an iPod bicycle charger. If you know of when then please link directly to the product.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    7. Re:One thing it has that I wish my iPod did: by Holi · · Score: 1

      Sorry I meant marware and thinkdifferentstore.com.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  21. iPod killer? by twbecker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I for one am tired of the pharse "iPod killer". The iPod is entrenched to the point that it is going to take more than a superior product to unseat it. It's going to take a strong marketing campaign, and tight integration with a popular download service. I can't speak to the latter (since I own an iPod and use the iTMS), but I do know that I don't recall ever seeing a TV commercial or even many print ads for a non iPod music player.

    --
    "The problem with internet quotations is that many are not genuine" -Abraham Lincoln
  22. iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To put my comment into perspective.

    The current age of portable music devices and Apple's position at the moment resembles the early Windows age and PCs.

    Apple had the best goods and they got stomped in the end. They got stomped because the other guys were available in more configurations, better pricing, and had greater overall compatibilities.

    I use an iPod and I have spent a good share of money on iTMS but to discount new players because they cannot use iTMS isn't fair let alone brite.

    What keeps me using my iPod is the fact it is very easy to use as a hard drive (3rd gen here). Now comes a player with features many of the iPod owners have been asking for and what do people do? Dis it for not being an iPod.

    Well damn, I would have much prefered a swappable battery or FM over the ability to show pictures. If I want to view my pictures on a teeny tiny screen I would leave them on the camera.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Basehart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "I use an iPod and I have spent a good share of money on iTMS but to discount new players because they cannot use iTMS isn't fair let alone brite."

      You don't think Apple would let this amazing situation they've worked so hard to create slip through their fingers do you?

      Apple only has to flip the switch and open Music Store up to other players, formats and DRM, and the game goes on.

      That's the great thing about technology that a lot of people forget...you can do anything.

      As for the players themselves, most of the so-called iPod killers are a piece of junk, primarily because they're produced from a set of poorly defined specs faxed over from Albertsons, or whoever wants to put out a player that week.

    2. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong, Apple is ONLY making 4c per song on iTunes. It has been argued that iTunes was a loss leader to promote the iPod. if they open iTunes to other players, it may NOT be worth their intrests.

      Secondly, this is NOT the original "iPod Mini" competitor. Create DID release the Muvo2 player earlier (my dad has one) its similar in size to the iPod mini, with a 4gb hard disk, and longer life REMOVABLE LiIon battery.

      The product was MUCH better than the iPod Mini in sound quality and convenience.

      It appeared as a removable HD (so YES it did work with Linux, provided your kernel supports standard USB disks)

      Later revisions of the Muvo2 did incorporate a FM radio.

      the main disadvatages of the Muvo2 is the plasticky look, and the small screen.

      the Mini ZEN is similar to the Muvo2, but incorporates the style of the full size Zen player. I am not sure if the Mini Zen is going to follow the Muvo route of using a "USB Mass storage" interface, or follow the Zen/Jukebox, and have a more proprietry USB interface. However, since there is already software supporting the Zen/Jukebox for linux, i shoudl say that Linux support shoudl be good, but i do hope they use the Mass Storage interface.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    3. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Holi · · Score: 1

      Oh yes and Apple has such a great history of opening up their technology to others. Let's see the last time they did it they almost drove themselves out of business. I really doubt you will see Apple opening iTunes while it is still in their control.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    4. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by KingPunk · · Score: 0

      the point being, its not all about pictures, as much as it is about album art.
      sure, you can view your "pictures", but its useless
      the new itms, syncs album art with your entire collection, which isn't so shabby
      but i agree, fm tuner, or user-serviceable/removeable/replaceable
      battery would be some of the better bets.

      regaurds, KingPunk

    5. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Anonym1ty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't think Apple would let this amazing situation they've worked so hard to create slip through their fingers do you?

      Apple only has to flip the switch and open Music Store up to other players, formats and DRM, and the game goes on.

      But that's just it... that's all Apple has to do. But this is Apple you are talking about. And that's just it. I don't wanna get all about the Apple zealots, but this just comes down to it.... Do you think Apple is gunna just flip the switch, or will this be another case of "We're Apple and we're better than you!" syndrome?

    6. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by pointyhairedmba · · Score: 1

      The current are of mp3 players is not like the early computer days, it's more like the early walkman days.

      You're forgetting that the mainstream user:

      Does not use a iPod as a hard drive. Really, only a small market segment even cares about this capability.

      Wants a solution that works out of the box

      As part of the previous point, wants easy music download that's vertically integrated into the product

      Will pay a premium for a brand leader, similiar to paying more for a Sony Walkman

    7. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Abjifyicious · · Score: 1
      Wrong, Apple is ONLY making 4c per song on iTunes. It has been argued that iTunes was a loss leader to promote the iPod. if they open iTunes to other players, it may NOT be worth their intrests.

      That's one reason they won't open up their Music Store to other portables, but there's another bigger reason for Apple not to open up their format that seems to go unnoticed for some reason.

      If the iPod is the only player that can play the music you bought, you will be restricted to buying iPods forever unless you want to buy your music all over again in a new format.

      Remember when the labels were trying to push for a a way to convert DRM'd AAC to DRM'd WMA? I wonder why it never happened...

      Remember when Apple tried to shut down the PlayFair project? Everyone said "Oh, but Apple's not evil! The only reason they're doing that is because the record labels are going to shut down our precious store if the DRM is broken!"

      Well apparently the labels had second thoughts, because the DRM is still broken and the iTMS is still up.

      Long ago, I too was an Apple nut. I still buy stuff from them because I think the iPod is the best portable player out there and I think Mac OS X is the best desktop OS, but I've realized that they're not as benevolent as they seem on the surface.

    8. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You don't think Apple would let this amazing situation they've worked so hard to create slip through their fingers do you?

      Isn't that apple's legacy? I used to be a mac user, but they dragged so far behind in power and price trying to milk 68k, and then trying to get performance out of the original PPC chips (601, 603, 604) without reducing their prices to make the systems competitive that I gave up on them and went to PC-land. MacOSX is pretty compelling but I simply can't afford to buy a G5 powermac, but I can upgrade my PC in pieces. So, they lost me until I have more money... which at this rate is going to be never :P

      Opening up iTMS would, as other people have stated, probably kill the iPod, because people don't necessarily want the best. They want something inexpensive that has the features they want the most.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      It's more, "We're Apple and our Mac revenues have been a little dissapointing but our iPods have been selling like gangbusters so we're going to keep doing what we believe is best to keep selling more iPods."

      --
      Random is the New Order.
    10. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Poseidon88 · · Score: 1

      Well, the features page says that it functions as an external HD, so I assume that means it appears as a standard USB mass storage device.

    11. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1
      It's more, "We're Apple and our Mac revenues have been a little dissapointing but our iPods have been selling like gangbusters so we're going to keep doing what we believe is best to keep selling more iPods."

      Sony sold a lot of BetaMAXs too... ---Now now, I do think iPod, and Apple and iTMS doe shave a good thing here, but face it Apple has a track record of screwing up the marketing of a good thing. AT some point it will be adventageous to open it up... And at that point will Apple open it and make even more money or will they stay in the same rut and eventually loose out?

    12. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      You don't think Apple would let this amazing situation they've worked so hard to create slip through their fingers do you?

      Hehehe! Funniest thing I've read all day...

      You were being sarcastic, right?

      I guess it's possible Apple has finally started to learn from their mistakes. There's a first time for everything...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    13. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Basehart · · Score: 1

      "You were being sarcastic, right?"

      Actually I wasn't. I really don't see how Apple will allow themselves to drown in the sea of WMA powered crap that's currently in a feeding frenzy outside the back door of their Music Store.

    14. Re:iTMS isn't going to save Apple in the long run by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1
      You forgot:
      • Equates "MP3 Player" with "iPod"
      Even articles that appear on this site sometimes refer to the iPod rather than using the generic term "MP3 player".
  23. Re:iPod killer? by fugu · · Score: 1

    it's competing with the mini, not the standard ipod. so it has 25% more storage space

  24. Re:why all the iPod animosity? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think the Creative player's battery is "removable" in the sense that you just pop a little cover open and the battery comes out. The iPod battery is "removable" in the same sense that my internal organs are "removable."

  25. but it looks so cheap and tacky... by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comapred to the Ipod mini it looks like a $5 calculator.

    The buttons look like they are those nasty indented clicky bubbles under sticky-back plastic that were all the rage about 10 years ago, and the display looks very basic and uninspired.

    The form-factor looks more bulky too.

    1. Re:but it looks so cheap and tacky... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      That got modded to flamebait? That sucks...

      Is no one allowed to post anything even slightly contrary any more?

    2. Re:but it looks so cheap and tacky... by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

      It should have stayed as flamebait as would a post about an iPod looking like a medical device for trendy seniors.

    3. Re:but it looks so cheap and tacky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is flamebait now?

    4. Re:but it looks so cheap and tacky... by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      evidently true... by the way your comment got mooded down too.

  26. The good thing about Apples store by shaka999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is that you can rip out the DRM. I refuse to buy anything that has DRM such that if the company goes under I'm stuck.

    I already had one machine die and when I contacted Apple to have it removed they made it sound like it was a big deal to take it off my approved list. Just imagine what will happen in 10 years when this technology is old. Whats going to happen? Will Apple be around?

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    1. Re:The good thing about Apples store by blixel · · Score: 1

      Is that you can rip out the DRM. I refuse to buy anything that has DRM such that if the company goes under I'm stuck.

      I don't like the DRM either. But I did run into this nice little utility which takes care of that. Obvioulsy it would be ideal to not have DRM at all, but unfortunately we live in reality.

      Now - if Apple will just start offering lossless downloads on iTMS, I'll actually be a regular customer. I don't mind the relative headache of unDRM'ing the music, but there's nothing I can do to bring the quality back to the original. Also - if iTMS sold lossless quality music, I could unDRM it and then convert it to FLAC/Ogg without losing anything.

    2. Re:The good thing about Apples store by 3nuff · · Score: 1

      I just went through a similar situation. I had used up all my authorized computers. One of which was at an old job and my personal one had gone down and needed a rebuild.

      I sent an email through customer service and they deauthorized all the computers on my account. The reply email was a little strong in language. Apple only does this as a "courtesy."

      In fairness to them, they need to do this to keep on good terms with the RIAA. It is basically DRM safety mechanism. Everyone knows how easy it is to copy music off the iPod to a PC. The authorization process is the only way to keep you from giving away the iTMS content to someone else. I know there are ways around this, but they are tedious...

      --
      "Give me taste, give me funk, give me fury, gimme some more."
    3. Re:The good thing about Apples store by crummynz · · Score: 1

      "unfortunately we live in reality" Oh, god... how true that statement is.

      --
      ~ Crummy
    4. Re:The good thing about Apples store by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      "unfortunately we live in reality" Oh, god... how true that statement is.

      This is Slashdot. It has nothing to do with reality. :P

  27. Re:Killer? hardly by garcia · · Score: 1

    1) FM radio? That will hardly drive sales...if there was anything to listen to on FM, XM and Sirius wouldn't have a business plan.

    What, the device is supposed to have an XM receiver?

    2) Removable battery? That is what is supposed to kill the iPod? Huhn?

    Personally, due to the number of devices that I have had batteries go in (cameras and cell phones) I would never buy an iPod for fear of the battery issues. Replacing the battery is a big factor for me.

  28. Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by PornMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every "iPod killer" has ended up in a ditch at the side of the road. Incremental feature advances just aren't going to do it. The iPod family are a de facto standard, and while some people might get individually excited about another player, whether a Rio, Creative, or Sony, the fact that everything is being compared to the iPod means that Apple is the one who sets the tone, sets the mindshare standard, and racks up the sales.

    Something would have to have twice the features at half the price with considerably more 'style' to "kill" the iPod. Everything out there now maxxes out at kicking iPod's shins.

    1. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by erick99 · · Score: 1

      I would wait a few months before committing this one to the ditches, it might do very well with consumers and since Wal*Mart sells a fair bit of Creative, it might do very well indeed.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    2. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by geg81 · · Score: 1

      The iPod family are a de facto standard,

      Well, and Windows is the de facto standards, too. That's why every Mac owner should sell their Mac immediately and buy a Windows machine, right?

      Something would have to have twice the features at half the price with considerably more 'style' to "kill" the iPod.

      Half the price with the same size and feature set is enough. And, hard as that may be for you to believe, some people just don't give a damn about "style" in their portable music players. In fact, there are many people who prefer devices that look sensible and cost less to devices that look "stylish" and have a price to match.

    3. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by good-n-nappy · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't disagree that the whole iPod killer thing is ridiculous. iPods are a status symbol. However, I do think FM recording is a non-incremental advancement. This basically enables something akin to TIVO for radio - i.e. low effort recording and (potentially) time shifting of content. Something I think could inspire a lot of new sales. It's hard to tell from the website and the PC Magazine article the exact UI controls for FM recording though. The FM recording may just be an afterthought.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of fiber.
    4. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by PornMaster · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but your analogy is entirely irrelevant. People aren't repeatedly going around calling Macs "PC Killers".

    5. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by geg81 · · Score: 1

      Who are you kidding? Apple goes around telling everybody to "switch" from PCs, although I suppose they realize the futility of trying to "kill" Windows. But they sure are trying to kill Linux and UNIX (although not having much success there either).

    6. Re:Getting sick of the term "iPod killers" by vicparedes · · Score: 1

      You're oversimplifying the reason people like and buy iPods. It's more than about style as you insist. The scroll wheel, believe it or not, is less intimidating for non-techies than multiple buttons on a player (which is why it's gotten so popular). And first impressions do not disappoint either--the iPod's interface is straightforward and intuitive. So before you dismiss the iPod's popularity as merely style-driven, think again. In fact, why don't you test drive one to see for yourself.

  29. 5GB growing? by dotslashconfig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone else find it slightly ironic that the claimed number of songs that 5GB of storage can hold is growing? For instance, the Zen Micro claims to hold 2,500 songs on its drive. However, wasn't the original 5 gig iPod advertised as being able to hold "1000 songs in your pocket"? Is 5 gigs of capacity growing, or are our standards for music quality shrinking?

    1. Re:5GB growing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the creators of the Zen like punk and thus the average song comes out to under 2MB in size when compressed ... :p

      Considering that at decent quality in MP3 a song is around 5MB in size, this Zen only holds 1000 songs. That, or the sound quality is so naff you might as well encode in very lossy format.

    2. Re:5GB growing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple was one of the first companies to advertise song capacity with a reasonably sane metric -- at the time of the original iPod, it was roughly five-minute, 160kbps MP3s. Nowadays it's 128kbps AAC (of which you can fit a few more in the same space).

      No idea how Creative's getting their numbers, but my guess would be at least part of it is shorter songs and maybe even the accursed lower bitrate MP3s.

    3. Re:5GB growing? by ibsteveog · · Score: 3, Informative
      This isn't hard to explain..

      From the article:
      You will never be without your favourite music with ZEN MICRO. Squeezed into its micro-sized casing is the capacity to store an astounding 2,500 songs on its 5GB hard drive (1)
      and from the footnote:
      (1) 2500 songs at 64kbps WMA. 1250 songs at 128kbps MP3. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary.
    4. Re:5GB growing? by dago · · Score: 3, Funny
      "are our standards for music quality shrinking?"

      Well ... you can understand music quality in 2 ways ...

      --
      #include "coucou.h"
    5. Re:5GB growing? by crucifer · · Score: 1

      Main reason is because Ipod does not supports WMA wich is way smaller than MP3. Creative's players do support WMA

    6. Re:5GB growing? by legirons · · Score: 1

      From the article:
      You will never be without your favourite music with ZEN MICRO. Squeezed into its micro-sized casing is the capacity to store an astounding 2,500 songs on its 5GB hard drive (1)

      From the footnote:
      (1) 2500 songs at 64kbps WMA. 1250 songs at 128kbps MP3. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary.

      We hear:
      (1) We're misleading. We're misleading. We're using incorrect units. We're blantly lying about the size. Your computer might know we're lying.

  30. Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by pla · · Score: 1, Informative
    Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux?

    From your own link:

    REQUIREMENTS
    • Microsoft® Windows® 98SE/Me/2000/XP
    • Intel® Pentium® II 350MHz or AMD K6® 450MHz (Pentium III 450MHz or higher recommended for MP3 encoding)
    • 64MB RAM (128MB recommended)
    • USB 1.1 port (USB 2.0 recommended for faster transfers)
    • 30MB free hard drive space (more for audio content storage)
    • CD-ROM drive with digital audio extraction support

    Any more questions?
  31. Spec comparison by jdreed1024 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It seems like this might be the first time that something being plugged as an "iPod killer" might actually compete with the iPod Mini (as in get a noticeable amount of market share, there are plenty of other devices that 'compete'). It's about the same size (0.2" thicker, and 0.3" shorter than the iPod Mini), which is nicely done. And it does have that extra 1GB of space. And comes in shiny colors. However, I can think of two things that could kill this device:
    • Interface: Apple's 'click wheel' is great, and very compact. If there's one thing they get right, it's human interface (well except for those god-awful early iMac mice) This has buttons, and from what I can tell, has ridges between the buttons, meaning your finger doesn't move seamlessly over the interface. This may seem like a nitpick, but it's not when you're manipulating it in your pocket. Apple's click wheel also has a concept of speed. When you're scrolling through an audiobook, if you run your finger around the wheel slowly, it moves slowly, if you run it fast, you can skip through hours of the book at a time. (Useful if you lost your place, or accidentally hit the "|
    • Doesn't play iTMS or Audible (.aa) tracks. Yes, we know Apple's not licensing iTMS widely - I'm not blaming Creative for omitting this feature. But iTMS *is* the dominant legal music download store at the moment, and that alone may push people towards an iPod Mini instead of this). It also appears to not play Audible audiobooks (though I may be missing some specs, since Creative's MuVo does play them).

    But all in all, looks to be a very nice device - let's see what the general public thinks.

    --
    There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    1. Re:Spec comparison by druxton · · Score: 2, Funny

      This may seem like a nitpick, but it's not when you're manipulating it in your pocket.
      That must look real good when you're standing in line or on a bus... "Honest, I'm just fast forwarding a bit"

    2. Re:Spec comparison by i_r_sensitive · · Score: 1
      This may seem like a nitpick, but it's not when you're manipulating it in your pocket.

      Wait a second, you're saying you aren't happy to see me, and that it is an iPod in your pocket?

      --
      "Talk minus action equals nothing" - Joey Shithead, D.O.A.
      "Talk minus action equals /." -
    3. Re:Spec comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interface: Apple's 'click wheel' is great, and very compact. If there's one thing they get right, it's human interface (well except for those god-awful early iMac mice) This has buttons, and from what I can tell, has ridges between the buttons, meaning your finger doesn't move seamlessly over the interface.

      That's the point: tactile feedback.

      Apple's click wheel also has a concept of speed.

      So does just about every scroll controller in existence.

      I honestly don't know what the masses will prefer. If there is one thing I do know: I don't want Apple dominating this market any more than I want Microsoft dominating the desktop market. Because while having few choices availabl to you may appeal to you, I like to have a choice among lots of different devices and user interfaces.

    4. Re:Spec comparison by jchandlerhall · · Score: 1

      Uh? Hellooooooo. You're quoting as a feature the proprietary 'locked in' format over MP3 support from a ton of online stores?????????? ON /.????? And when a decent company attempts to offer the format of the world's choice for an IPOD, Apple immediately starts a FUD campaign as to why you'd better not purchase MP3s for your IPod? (Real Networks)

    5. Re:Spec comparison by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      AAC is not proprietary in the sense you're using it; certainly, it is no more or less proprietary than MP3.

      And you are no more and no less 'locked-in' with iTMS than you are with any of the DRMed online stores - you can only (legally) transfer those songs to a device supported by the DRM software.

      Practically, you are even less limited by iTMS, since tools aren't hard to find for removing that protection and transferring it to any device that will understand the AAC format.

      (For the record, I have never spent a dime on iTMS - I prefer to actually buy something physical, which is why its nearly time for a new shelf to hold the latest batch of book, CD, vinyl, and DVD purchases.)

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:Spec comparison by jchandlerhall · · Score: 1

      And your response to the FUD threats from Apple about RealNetworks 'opening' up music content to an IPOD purchaser? Doesn't this infuriate you? When I realized Apple was going to go so far as to change future versions JUST to break Real's alternative choice, I decided NOT to ever buy an IPOD. U/I and looks aren't that important to me. I want to make sure that I can buy songs from whatever source I choose. I bought the device. I buy ths songs. I don't need AppleBigBro to "own" me or my music player. How about you?

    7. Re:Spec comparison by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. It pissed me off because it was a dumb move. It was legal (and appropriate!) for Real to make their DRM compatible with the iPod. It was legal (but *dumb*) for Apple to change the DRM in future versions to break Real. The threats were stupid, but I've heard worse and I didn't really believe them anyway - they're just the sort of letters lawyers generate in their sleep, as some sort of natural process - normal people sweat and shit, lawyers write torts and C&Ds.

      It pissed me off, but it had nothing to do with the iPod itself. It might have furthered my resolve to have nothing to do with iTMS, but a) I already own an iPod and b) I don't buy music online, and probably never will - I like record stores, and used CD shopping, and having physical things, so I give not one shit about online shops being compatible or not. I care a lot about U/I and form factor, and the iPod is still the clear winner on both of those to me.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  32. OGG Support? by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    The sparse info on the linked page doesn't seem to offer much in terms of supported formats. MP3 and WMA seem to be there, but what else?

    I know it's just a pipe dream, but I'd like to see at least a couple vendors release a sdk that could let users develop their own plugins. Take a page out of the book of id, a modable system allows others to create content for your system, helping to make it all the more popular.

    1. Re:OGG Support? by Antity-H · · Score: 1

      Other comments like this, point that it won't support ogg.

      If you want a player that supports ogg you can always try the neuros II ( http://www.neurosaudio.com/ )
      It is not a mini-ipod 'killer' but it does seem to have a few good sides (including the 'same price for 20Gb' side ..) The dimension ain't the same though (of course)

  33. Interesting by AgentAce · · Score: 0, Troll

    I wonder why the 20gig version costs less than the 5gig version. I would rather buy a unit with 4 times the storage and pay $12 less than the 5gig unit.

    1. Re:Interesting by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1
      I wonder why the 20gig version costs less than the 5gig version.

      Because miniaturization ain't free.

    2. Re:Interesting by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      "Micro" Dimensions:
      Item width: 2 inches
      Item height: 3.3 inches
      Item depth: .7 inches

      Zen Touch (20gig) Dimensions:
      4.12 inches by 2.7 inches by 0.866 inches

      Not by much...

    3. Re:Interesting by Monf · · Score: 1
      I wonder why the 20gig version costs less than the 5gig version

      Like I said a ways down the thread, it's the hard drives....

      Check the amazon link, and go down to the customer reviews of it, and one guy talks about his drive crashing after like 2 days - I had the same experience...

      --
      Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
    4. Re:Interesting by AgentAce · · Score: 1

      I get rated Troll for this when an AC further down gets rated Interesting for the same thing? Here Interesting indeed...

    5. Re:Interesting by DeeKayWon · · Score: 1
      4.12in * 2.7in * 0.866in = 9.63in^3
      2in * 3.3in * 0.7in = 4.62in^3

      So the volume of the Micro is under half that of the Zen Touch. I'd say that's significant.

  34. I'll never buy Creative again by bigtangringo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I purchased a Nomad Jukebox back in the day (6GB), the Nomad requried a proprietary software to copy songs to the device. I lost the CD with the software on it, Creative does not offer a downloadable version of the software on their website. Contacting customer support does not help either as they will not send you the software.

    I now have a $300 paperweight. Maybe their practices have changed, but the experience has burned me badly. I will never purchase Creative again. I highly suggest to anyone considering their new product (or any product of theirs for that matter) that you make sure you can get into the device without proprietary software before making a purchase.

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    1. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      complete bullshit, you can download any creative product available, but of course the "anti" view always gets +.

      Really, everyone jumps up to defend the ipod, when the sound quality is up there with the scratched 45. Would you apple minions please sit down any check out all the other players sometime, you *will* be shocked.

    2. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I then challenge you to find a download of Creative Playcenter (that doesn't require a previous version to be already installed) on their website.

    3. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a couple of minutes of searching I also found http://nomadsync.sourceforge.net/

    4. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or try NotMad from Red Chair Software. It's really, really nice, and also lets you stream from the player back through your computer's audio outputs (at least via WinAmp5). I used the free version for like 12 hours before I bought the registered version. http://www.redchairsoftware.com/

    5. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by spinozaq · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should ask the slashdot crew for anyone that has this CD to send you a copy of it. It's not like you're the only person who bought the product, and there is this whole great super communication thing called the internet ;) ... You'll get that nomad back running in no time...

      Also... Creative does offer downloadable applications. "Creative NOMAD Explorer (Version 3.01.10) (11.22 MB)"... http://www.nomadworld.com/downloads/drivers/downlo ad2.asp?Product_ID=239&dlcentric=8069&Product_Name =JukeBox+2&OSName=Windows+XP

      Not what you need?

    6. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I had that with the Audigy II EX.

      The CD that came with the device was fubar, so I went onto the site only to be greeted with a notice to use my original installation CD. I called support and they basically said I was stuffed.

      Luckily the old Audigy driver worked... I never got the external box working. Ironically Linux handled it far better than Windows!

      (yes I know you can download the drivers now - they eventually seem to have relented, however I since junked that card as useless and am not about to try a creative product again).

    7. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Gadzinka · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Zen Micro, but my Creative MuVo 4GB works as a plain external usb storage with every modern operating system. Without any third party software.

      See, unlike you I did some product research before buying this device. All the Creative HDD mp3 players before MuVo line were the crap with proprietary protocols for transferring songs. Even the newest Zen Touch still uses that crappy protocol, again revised, so it doesn't work with current GNomad.

      And don't ever believe Creative reps promising reviewers "usb storage firmware upgrade" in three months. They're making this promise for over two years now, with every new player.

      If I needed 20+ GB player I'd definitelly go for iRiver. As it stands now I'm more than happy with my 4G MuVo -- it just works, quality of audio output as well as battery life are great. And the battery can be replaced in about 3 seconds, unlike "some other mp3 player".

      Robert

      --
      Bastard Operator From 193.219.28.162
    8. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. Creative has everything proprietary in the Zen line. It won't even sync regular MP3's or WMA's with iTunes on a PC or Mac. Your muvo is a anomoly. It's like the Muvo and the Zen lines are built by two different companies.

      --

      Gorkman

    9. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by C32 · · Score: 1

      prolly are, what with the idiotic trend of outsourcing even r&d, creative are just slapping a bagde on a pre-made player from some asian oem.

    10. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      I'd come to the same conclusion -- I want an many-GB mp3 player for the gym and for the bike, and I'm one of the few people who WOULD actually use the microphone-to-mp3 recording for classes, but the iRiver series has priced itself just high enough to make me think twice. Maybe Black Friday will see it on sale somewhere?

    11. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Savafan1 · · Score: 1

      Um...the software has been on their nomadworld site for years. I have a the same player you have, and I have no clue where the original cd is, but I could download it from here: http://www.nomadworld.com/downloads/drivers/downlo ad.asp

      I did finally upgrade to a Zen, which I'm using Gnomad2 to load from linux.

      There is also the redchair software that is much better than the standard creative stuff.

    12. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by tenchi90 · · Score: 1

      why dont you just get Notmad? Its an unoffical tranfer Program that IMHO is much better than creatives software,. you can buy it for very cheap at www.redchairsoftware.com Cheers!

    13. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that, I bought my MuVo^2 this past summer and have used it steadily for 2 hours a day (bus to work, bus back from work) without so much a hitch. Just plug it in and Windows/Linux IDed it as a MSD and off I was. In fact, even my BIOS IDed it as a MSD and can boot off of it if necessary (haven't tried yet). The battery lasts about a week with this kind of usage (provided it's plugged into AC when transferring files). BTW. this is pretty much exactly the spec that Creative quoted. They said 15 hours of battery life, I get around 14. And it plays WMA to boot. Sweet player for $250 CDN. My only gripe is that you can't change the CF card in there very easily. It would've been the GOD of players if you could remove the CF/HD in there and pop in a new one and use the thing as a CF reader.

      I also never understood the 10GB player crowd. Do you *really* want 3000 tracks when you are mobile?? That's like 40 hours of music! your battery will run out well before you listen to all that music.

      meh, I'll be a nomad user for a while. iPOD white is UUGLY. silver/black with blue backlight.. now *that*'s sexy. whatever floats your boat though I guess.

    14. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by crush · · Score: 1

      I'll take it off your hands for $30 including postage.

    15. Re:I'll never buy Creative again by darrylo · · Score: 1

      I'll second this.

      If you must use windows, the commercial software, notmad, is the way to go (I never liked Creative's software). Notmad makes the MP3 player accessible via windows explorer. The licensing is a bit funky, though (you buy licenses for particular models of Creative MP3 players, or you can buy a blanket license).

      The UI can appear to be a bit weird, but that's largely caused by the Creative MP3 players, which do not implement a standard FAT32/etc. filesystem.

  35. That is not a strength. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0

    That is not a strength. The Apple music files are overpriced (doubled that of some competitors), and are crippled to make it hard to play them (I know, the others do that to). If I ever get a high-storage-volume digitial music player, it will be based on the cost and features of the unit itself. Besides, you can play Apple music store files on other machines.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  36. Forgot to mention review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooops, almost forgot to mention the review of the device. There is a good comparison of how much better it works under Linux than Windoze. See the review and comparison here: http://businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_45/b39 07083_mz054.htm/

  37. Another Zen eh? I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the headphones socket will break for this one too.

  38. Re:iPod killer? by JawFunk · · Score: 1
    So it's an iPod killer with, at most, one-third the storage space.

    They are rivaling the iPod Mini. Creative and others have realized that the average consumer doesn't need to carry around more than 1000 songs per day, or week, or month. So they opted for smaller size, with focus on style and features. The 5GB will become obsolete once people decide to emulate walking computers by caryying their data all over the place, the way we do laptops.
    The large iPods are meant for us hard-core music lovers, but are too bulky in some people's opinion.

    --
    [Please sign here]
  39. but this one's MESMERIZING by jpellino · · Score: 1

    it says so right on the specs - how can they lose?

    They'll sell one to every kiddie with a modded Civic so it'll match the resst of the blue stuff that makes their cars go faster.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:but this one's MESMERIZING by Loko+Draucarn · · Score: 1

      > blue stuff that makes their cars go faster.

      Which is a rather silly idea. After all, every Ork worth his teef knows that red wunz go fasta.

      Blue's just lucky.

  40. Re:iPod killer? by hattig · · Score: 1

    Well it has got 25% more storage space than the iPod mini.

    OTOH the iPod mini was released aeons ago in comparison. You'd hope that in the 10 or so months since it was released that capacities would go up and competitors would be able to catch up.

    What's more interesting is what Apple's next update to the iPod mini will bring.

    I think that Apple still have style on their side, and ease of use. The Zen Micro will have a few more features however (radio and stuff). Unfortunately for them, it won't have the name, and 4GB vs 5GB isn't an amazing difference.

  41. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5, Schadenfreud.

    I wonder how many linux fanboys are going to buy one of these based solely on your "advice" (which contradicts the system requirements, btw), anonymous coward. Good work!

  42. iPod killer eh... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    So killer that they even nicked the iPod mini's feature of being available in different colours. But they have it in MORE colours than the mini so it HAD to be better right?

    These guys need to learn to be better than Apple, not just clone their product and sell it cheaper ffs.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:iPod killer eh... by JoJoFine · · Score: 1

      actually before the iPod Mini was even announced they had polls on Nomadworld.com asking what colors people would like to see on future Creative mp3 players

  43. It can do that... by Maagma · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone know if this thing will work with Linux? But can it run Half-Life 2?

  44. Re:Killer? hardly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1) I know this is Slashdot, but if you've ever been to a gym where they have TVs in front of the cardio machines, they broadcast the sound on low powered FM transmitters. FM is something that is quite useful to us geeks that work out.

    2) A removable battery is great for travelling when you don't always have easy access to electricity. Just pop out one battery and put another one in. This feature alone has kept me from buying an iPod.

    3) That's true so far.

  45. ogg = market percentage? slim to none by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If most companies don't support linux when creating their products, why should Creative? Is the market there?

    I mean, it's great that iRiver pays attention and try to reach out to the most customers possible but creative, like most other companies making "ipod killers", just care about windows cause it's a no brainer that the market is there.

  46. Linux support already confirmed... by downward+dog · · Score: 1

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=128628&cid=107 34831

    1. Re:Linux support already confirmed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I'll wait for a non-Anonymous Coward to confirm it with a link to some proof at least.

  47. THIS IS A TROLL. There is NO linux support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish moderators would RTFA before blindly moderating things informative.

  48. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, if it isn't true, why would the moderators mod me up as +3 Informative? Think about it, why wouldn't they support Linux? Everyone is switching from Windows to Linux now. More information about that here: http://businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_45/b39 07083_mz054.htm/

  49. It sure keeps me from getting an iPod by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "2) Removable battery? That is what is supposed to kill the iPod? Huhn?"

    The serious design flaw involving the battery is one major thing that keeps me away from the iPod. Anything where there is a not-insignificant risk of destroying the unit just by changing the battery (see the Popular Science article) has a problem. It is odd that Apple, a company known for "ease of use" overlooked the easy-to-use standard sliding battery hatch that has been around for decades.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:It sure keeps me from getting an iPod by Rew190 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just giving you my personal experience, I've had my iPod for about a year now and have not noticed the battery time being any less than about 5 hours. This doesn't really matter though, because it's rare that I listen to my iPod for 5 hours straight and then don't get a chance to charge it.

      I can understand your concerns, but it's really not the huge issue it's made out to be unless you think you're going to use it for 4+ hours at a time without a charge.

  50. looks pretty stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    did anyone read the fine print at the bottom??
    4 requires microsoft outlook
    ???? what the hell is that crap??!!

    1. Re:looks pretty stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, in the English language we refer to that as a 'footnote':

      Not only does it play music, the ZEN MICRO helps you keep your life organized too. The mini-organizer consists of a calendar, an address book and a to-do-list*4.

      *4 Requires Microsoft Outlook.

      And for everyone who still deals with space in terms of number of files (i.e. holds 1000 images! 2500 mp3s! whatever..), try doing the math instead to see what they are getting at, or you can just read the footnote:

      *1 2500 songs at 64kbps WMA. 1250 songs at 128kbps MP3. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary.

      And the rest of the footnotes, just for the hell of it:

      *2 Actual battery life will vary with use.
      *3 Additional Li-ion battery sold separately.

    2. Re:looks pretty stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it means you were too lazy to read the article

    3. Re:looks pretty stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i may have been too lazy to read the article... but then again.. why would i want my mp3 player to work as a address book?? aren't these things supposed to play music? why do companies try to make mp3 players into pdas? where are the 5, 20 and 40 gig pocket pcs, palm pilots and cell phones? now that's something i would use

  51. Re:Linux? Doubtful. by wes33 · · Score: 1

    creative muvo nomad -- flash based mp3 player -- is just a usb-storage device. It works perfectly with linux, except for firmware upgrades

  52. HAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday, things like that will be true... sigh...

  53. Colors are nice by JawFunk · · Score: 1

    I like that they made it available in so many diferent colors. That will definately be a selling-point. However, I'm surprised this one isn't also flash memory, or is that too heavy for 5GB? I'm considering complementing this with my iPod becuase it has radio, and sometimes my apetite is only satisfied with AM radio.

    --
    [Please sign here]
    1. Re:Colors are nice by chochos · · Score: 1
      I like that they made it available in so many diferent colors. That will definately be a selling-point


      Right. That way I wouldn't have had to paint my iPod pink. Or that bright blue or that orange... I think the reason Apple had few colors is because they only chose the ones that actually looked good (and I'm not really sure about the green mini). These guys have a lot of colors that look like crap.

      Oh, and this thing doesn't have AM radio, just FM.
  54. Removable battery? Big deal. by fingon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it took me all of 10 minutes to change battery in my ipod, using just tools included within replacement kit (from Other World Computing IIRC).

    And if I didn't want to do it myself, Apple would've done it happily enough (but would have charged twice as much for bit less powerful battery.. but I digress).

    --
    -- pending
    1. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but what if fell asleep with it turned on and wanted to take it out for a jog in the morning? If the battery were removable you'd be able to swap it but you can't so no music for you. You can't even call it a design flaw since Apple (as well as its advocates) tries so hard to be as much of a pain in the ass as possible.

    2. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >it took me all of 10 minutes to change battery in my ipod

      Oh, so you'll just stop in the middle of the street, take out your screwdriver set, screw out the cover, put the screws in you mouth, replace the battery, and put the cover back? Or run 20 miles to the nearest apple store?

    3. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by fingon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, considering my old battery lasted some 10 hours-ish (and even in it's waning year_s_ 5-6h or so), and new one seems to last over one day, I don't see the issue.

      Obviously, if you're 'out there' for 24+ hour jogs or something I might see the problem, but given modern battery technology, why bother?

      And if you're too lazy to plug the player to dock when near computer, I'm not sure how replaceable batteries you've forgotten to charge help..

      --
      -- pending
    4. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by dresgarcia · · Score: 1

      You make it sound like not having a removeable battery is a huge inconvinience. Its really not, see if you leave for your jog with a charged ipod it will last. Or wait even if you ipod has less than 1/4 of the battery left it should still make it. My ipod could not be the size it is if it used removeable batteries, unless they were proprietary. So for that I am thankful that I have to make the huge effort to plug my ipod in to charge at night or when i am not using or when I am using it in my car. So basically its always charged since its charged everytime I am in my car or at my computer. Because its just that easy to charge it.. . now if you are talking about a 3 day camping trip thats different. . . but why are you bringing an ipod with you anyway. . . get in touch with nature.

    5. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      Most people aren't going to bother buying a second removable battery, and few will keep it charged if they do... which eliminates your whole point.

      It's like cellphones. Most people don't buy an extra battery for their phone, even though it is removable/exchangeable, because the battery life on 1 is good enough 99.9% of the time, and the other 0.1% of the time they just deal with it. Unless you like the phone enough to want to keep it after the battery decays, in which case you buy a replacement battery.

      Easily exchangeable is not the same as replaceable.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    6. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit! everyone I know has an extra battery for their cellphone. If I go camping I always carry an extra battery. Also cellphone batteries usually last longer for the average user.

    7. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nahhh.. its been discussed before and the majority of the people agree that Apple could have designed it to open in the back. I think these small design quirks are meant to conform you to the religion that is Apple.

    8. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one thing too, though maybe I'm just a freak.... I bought a clearcase and a flashing battery for my phone. My original battery is fine. But being a sysadmin in a couple of computer rooms, I have a fine appreciation for blinkin lights. I need more blinking lights. And besides, if I drop something in the dark, I can pull out my phone and the bright LEDs will illuminate the way.

    9. Re:Removable battery? Big deal. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      a) Bullshit your bullshit. Damn near no one I know has an extra battery, AND WE ARE ENGINEERS WORKING FOR A CELLPHONE COMPANY. When we go camping, we leave the damn phones off, which means a single battery is plenty. I know a lot of people who own 24-port managed switches; this does not mean its a normal thing, it means my friends are a bit weird. Similarly, most people don't seem to buy extra batteries (based on what friends who work in cellphone stores/Best Buy type stores tell me).

      b) My cellphone batteries last, on average, about 2 years before deteriorating, with heavy daily use (cell-only user, no landline). My iPod battery, a little over a year in, is fine; I fully expect to see the same lifetime out of it.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  55. Re:Killer? hardly by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    I can honestly respond with this: the only reason I have not purchased an iPod mini is the lack of a removable battery. So, yeah, for me PERSONALLY, it's a mini iPod killer.

  56. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually linux does support it. All you have to do is write the driver!

  57. Re:iPod killer? by spooky_nerd · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I have an original iPod, the 5Gig model. At the time, it was sold as 1000 songs in your pocket. I can't help noticing that this same device is advertising 2,500 songs. So, err...bit rate? I think they're claiming a little too much for themselves."

    Yes, it's the bit rate. According to the article:
    "2500 songs at 64kbps WMA. 1250 songs at 128kbps MP3. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary."

    I think 2500 songs isn't enough. Encode them at 32kbps and get 5000. Better yet, encode them at 16kbps and get 10000! Or, if you want to be extreme, encode them at 1kbps and get 160,000 songs on your device! Wow!

  58. Try Nomadness... by zjbs14 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Easy fix to this one: http://www.nomadness.net

    They have all the older versions of the Creative software, back to Playcenter 2.x, drivers, and lots of other goodies.

    And FWIW, I would suspect the new player will work with Gnomad, the free Nomad software for Linux.

    Unless you were just wanting to rant on Creative for a while...

    --
    No sig, sorry.
  59. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, if it supports OGG, I will finally have a portable music player I am willing to spend money on (besides my laptop).

  60. I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would you pay $250 for this? I paid $230 for my Creative Nomad Jukebox Zen Extra, which has 6 times the storage space.

    1. Re:I don't get it... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Because it's smaller.

      Sometimes people want smaller things. Your Zen Extra is huge compared to the Zen Micro.

  61. Re:Killer? hardly by Textbook+Error · · Score: 1

    Personally, due to the number of devices that I have had batteries go in (cameras and cell phones) I would never buy an iPod for fear of the battery issues.

    Personally, the "iPod batteries die" story doesn't match my experience. I have two original 5Gb iPods, purchased in December 2001, which are still doing fine (6 hours on one, 5 on the other).

    Sure, the batteries will die eventually. But to be honest they're as likely to end their life due to being stolen/dropped/soaked/etc like any other piece of consumer electronics you carry around with you whenever you leave the house.

    --

    Nae bother
  62. but but but ... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 3, Funny

    But it doesn't have a camera! I thought every audio device had to have a camera? or at least a battery-devouring, expensive color display?

  63. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, relax! If they're too stupid to follow the link and find out it's bogus, AND too stupid to look at the product requirements, they probably won't even read my post. The gig is not up yet.

  64. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This product is not made by Apple, so by definition it sucks."

  65. Tired of more of the same. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am waiting for a company to have the balls to make a mp3 or ogg or other replacement for my Sony Minidisc recorder or my Sony portable DAT recorder.

    I have been through 3 minidisc recorders they can not be beat for ultra portable and covert recording.

    Example, I recorded the Tragically Hip concert last holloween. (Yes it was allowed, hell people had camcorders and SLR cameras) and produced a live recording that is 20 times better than anything I could buy. I also record ambient things. The last Michigan/MSU game gave me phenominal crowd recordings.

    Why doesn anyone make an iPOD type device that will record in STEREO with manual level adjustment and both line in and mic in?

    THAT would be an Ipod Killer.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iriver h120 records in stereo. It has a both analog and optical line-in. It records in MP3 or WAV, and the MP3 bitrate can be set. It also has a built-in microphone and comes with an external microphone. The only thing it lacks (I think) is a manual level adjustment.

      Oh, and it plays OGG.

      I love mine.

    2. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Rattencremesuppe · · Score: 1

      Why doesn anyone make an iPOD type device that will record in STEREO with manual level adjustment and both line in and mic in?

      Archos' Jukebox Recorder can record in stereo via analog or S/PDIF line in with manual level adjustment. But it has no built-in mic preamp, AFAIK.

    3. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      the manual level adjustment and the missing Microphone input are what kills it for me.

      In order to get good recordings you MUST have manual record levels. the last thing you want is a AGC pumping the gain while recording. also unless you like to carry a preamp/mixer haing mic level in is also as important.

      I have 2 tinly microphones buried in a set of croakies eyeglass holders that run down my back under my shirt into my pocket where my Minidisc recorder or the DAT recorder resides. I can then press record and get astounding stereo recordings (as long as I do not turn my head much) and the manual record setting is absolutely a MUST when recording a concert so you can get the dynamic range. the DAT deck has a rotary knob and VU meters to set the levels, while the minidisc recorder has VU meters and a single up/down adjustment with buttons when paused.

      I used to have a cheaper DAT recorder that had no manual record level adjustment, it sucked. quiet passages had the gain increased so room noise took over and the second a hard note is hit it mutes down everything else.

      the Iriver is close, but they need to go just a little further and they would havea GREAT device.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Tired of more of the same. by {Hecubus} · · Score: 1

      Where can I get a copy of The Hip concert you recorded?

      No, seriously.

      I'm a big hip fan and would love to have a copy.

      -Chris
      (c_leigh@NOSPAM.lycos.com)

      --
      Unix is mysterious, and ancient, and strong. It's made of cast iron and the bones of heroic programmers of old -
    5. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why doesn anyone make an iPOD type device that will record in STEREO with manual level adjustment and both line in and mic in?

      Well, there is the Edirol R-1, although it uses flash rather than a tiny hard drive. (Although I think it can use type II CompactFlash and thus 2GB CF microdrives, but I'm not sure about that.)

      Or, if you want to get a little more serious, there is the Edirol R-4 (with 40 GB hard drive) or the Marantz PMD670. Neither of these last two is nearly as tiny as the iPod. In fact, they're pretty bulky, but they definitely do the job. And they both have XLR microphone inputs (with phantom power) so you can plug in a good microphone. (Warning: good microphones cost a lot of money.)

      Now, you may complain that these devices are too big or too expensive, but you did say you want manual input levels and other things that imply you want to make a quality recording, so that's how you do it. :-)

    6. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Now, you may complain that these devices are too big or too expensive, but you did say you want manual input levels and other things that imply you want to make a quality recording, so that's how you do it. :-)

      funny part is that my circa 1998 minidisc recorder and portable DAT deck are the size of a pack of cards and a can of coke respectively and can do all that Sans the XLR connections. (XLR is useless when you are being covert.. if I wanted to lug around XLr capable I'd bring a laptop, high end USB soundcard, a mackie mixer and a pair of ME-66 microphones and stands with isolation holders.

      for some reason carrying 300 pounds of equipment into a concert is not a good idea.

      I get fantastic recordings from a tiny set of capsule microphones on my glasses into a minidisc recorder. I can set record levels manually and it has microphone in AND line in if they will let me jack into the mixer (Yes, a band DID allow me to do that once.)

      so tell me again WHY this can not be done today with a digital recorder?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      when I get around to converting it I'll let you know.

      until then have you checked out

      thehip.dyndns.org?

      there's gobs of good bootlegs there, just dont nail it too hard and too offten.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you got to a mackie mixer... why, oh why, would you do that to your sound? (I don't like Mackie's pre-amps, I will note.)

      But yeah, a nice portable HDD with MD equivalent features would be great - I use my MD for similar things, mostly to record my own shows.

      I'd check Marantz and HHB's offerings (I'm too lazy to do it right this second) - they've always made good portable recording gear, though not usually aimed at being covert.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    9. Re:Tired of more of the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, when I think of the Hip, I think Grossly Overrated. Nearly as overrated as Pearl Jam or Nirvana. Nearly.

  66. Re:Spec comparison*bullshit* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    >But iTMS *is* the dominant legal music download store at the moment

    No-one ouside the apple fanbase has ever heard of iTMS, please keep drinking the apple juice *hic*, but no-one else in he world is falling for this.

  67. First iPod clone to be suseptable to viruses? by apachetoolbox · · Score: 2, Funny

    I read... The mini-organizer consists of a calendar, an address book and a to-do-list (4)... which is cool!

    Then down at the bottom I read... (4) Requires Microsoft Outlook.

    Really nice of them to make it require something like MS LookOut. This is one of those rare situations where I'd actaully prefer some 3rd party application. Most people will have it plugged in when they check mail so it'll recharge. Next we'll have yet another outlook virus, but this one uploads 100's Gwar MP3's.

    1. Re:First iPod clone to be suseptable to viruses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next we'll have yet another outlook virus, but this one uploads 100's Gwar MP3's.

      Please tell me where I can download this virus, as my Gwar catalogue is incomplete.

  68. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly my point. And since everyone in the world is a programmer and has a bunch of free time like me, proper support should be out real soon now. Maybe I should have clarified my original post. When I meant "supported" I meant I only had to spend 210 hours writing and debugging the software under Ubuntu. However, now it works for me (well 40% of the time anyway, the OGG playback skips but only every 6 seconds).

    I'll put my source code on sourceforge.net where I am sure a bunch of quality software developers will pick it up and maintain it.

  69. Bah, that's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These soldiers are losing their lives not just for Iraq, but also for you and me.

    No, actually they died for nothing.

  70. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by pla · · Score: 1

    Okay, someone explain to me why this seems either redundant or a troll? The article asked a question, no one else had answered it, so I did.

    I don't normally bitch about moderation, but really, WFT? I didn't say anything bad about Apple, or discuss politics. I responded to a question the original poster could have answered himself, had he bothered reading the text at the very link he gave!

    Sad, people.

  71. Off Topic by AgentAce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You're so far off topic it scares me

  72. Re:iPod killer? by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    To quote the Zen Micro site:

    2500 songs at 64kbps WMA. 1250 songs at 128kbps MP3. 1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary.

  73. Re:why all the iPod animosity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be quiet, you know that insulting the apple slacky's isn't allowed on /.

    Repeat after me;

    Apple is great
    Apple is great
    Apple rules us all.

    Who needs elections?

  74. Same problem with HP! by apachetoolbox · · Score: 1

    I had the exact same problem with an HP camera. They wanted something like $30 for the software at the time! This was before XP.

  75. Re:Killer? hardly by computerme · · Score: 0, Troll

    new batteries for ipod are found very easily on the web for 50 bucks.

    if a person is honestly giving up on the phenomenal connectivity, amazing and simple interface, the greatest digital music store on the planet, and the fact its the best looking mp3 player bar none. Just because of a lack of a removable battery then that person is just plain foolish. IMO.

    and by foolish i mean stupid.

  76. Re:Killer? hardly by seraphina · · Score: 1

    Actually, the lack of FM radio capability is one of the things that is keeping me from buying any of the iPods and is making me consider the iRivers. Radio in the US may suck, but FM in the UK has delights such as Radio 4 and other regional stations.

    A decent MP3 player with a DAB radio facility would rock:-)

  77. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll put my source code on sourceforge.net where I am sure a bunch of quality software developers will pick it up and maintain it

    No thanks. It's already there.

  78. No linux support at all by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 4, Informative

    Please mod the parent down, it's a troll.

    I recently got a Creative Zen Touch (a present from my company; if I had to choose it'd be an iPod), and I've already spent an unsuccesfull day getting it to work under linux. There is no way that you would mount this device, since it is NOT an USB mass storage device but uses proprietary Creative protocols.

    There is one open-source project (Gnomad2) that claims to do the job, but I haven't been able to get that working. If I had the C skills and the time, I would try writing a LUFS plugin. For now, I'm pondering buying an USB2 card, because gnomad2 refuses to work with usb1.1 it seems.

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
    1. Re:No linux support at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works great here? Are you using Ubuntu, like me? Thats all I have experience with but YMMV.

      I have C skills and a lot of free time too.

    2. Re:No linux support at all by Ithika · · Score: 1
      For now, I'm pondering buying an USB2 card, because gnomad2 refuses to work with usb1.1 it seems.
      I don't think that'll solve your problems. I use Gnomad2 to connect to my (USB 1.1/IEEE 1394) Nomad Zen and it works fine. So, you're problem shouldn't be the USB version in use...
    3. Re:No linux support at all by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 1

      There are many Linux programs based on libnjb which allow Creative mp3 players to be used with Linux. One of them is this project which causes the device to appear as a file system in KDE. What did the grandparent post say again? Something about "easy to use KDE software"?

      As another example, I use my Dell DJ (manufactured by Creative) on Linux with gnomad2. So yes, Linux support for Creative-built mp3 players does exist. "Excellent" might be an exaggeration since you may have to install from source, but that's about it.

      Needless to say, it is the parent of _this_ post which should be modded down (or at least not modded up so highly). The fact that a particular individual cannot do something rarely means that it cannot be done, but people tend to make that generalization anyway. And moderators tend to believe them.

  79. Re:Linux Support Confirmed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I aosp tried it and Ubunto works fine as well as my toaster.

    I feel really good cince using ubuntu.. U loce ubuntio..

    we all must USE UBUNTU LINUX!!!!!

    back to reality.

    it does NOT work with linux. you are a liar and a jerk siimply trying to get the name of a substandard Linux distro out on the mainstream.

  80. Re:iPod killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the Zen Micro, Creative's answer to the Ipod-mini"

    Read much?

  81. Re:Linux? Doubtful. by wildcard84 · · Score: 1

    Linux support for most creative mp3 players is available under linux. Try using libnjb and gnomad2. They are available at libnjb.sourceforge.net and gnomad2.sourceforge.net. I've never heard of anyone being unhappy with a creative mp3 player and linux (and until the ipod most of my friends had creative mp3 players)

  82. Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have support for all other Creative jukeboxen (original, 2, 3, Zen, NX, Xtra and the OEM:ed Dell DJ) in libnjb working with e.g. gnomad2 for Linux (and BSD) or XNJB for Mac OS X. If the protocol hasn't changed substantially it can be easily supported.

    If it is USB mass storage compliant it will work out of the box. All USB mass storage devices (MuVO^2 etc.) works with the native kernel driver.

    What I've heard is that it only use mass storage for regular files though, not music content. There are rumors however that this beast use or can be made to use the Microsoft Media Transfer Protocol (also used by Creative Zen Media Center). MTP will talk over TCP/IP over an Microsoft RNDIS link. (Which is supported by the Linux kernel.)

    Linu Walleij author of gnomad2 and parts of libnjb.

  83. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by thunderbee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it's seen as a dumb USB storage, il will work on linux, regardless of the requirements.
    My Finepix camera requires some version of windows, and nevertheless works like a charm with linux out of the box.

    So I believe the question stands.

    --
    In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  84. Re:Killer? hardly by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Even mobile phones have FM these days :)

    DAB seems pretty much dead (local stores have either stopped selling it or have it in the 'managers specials' at 80% off)... however if they could put one in a 5GB MP3/OGG player and keep the total price around the £100-£150 mark it would be a good product.

  85. Re:iPod killer? by helmespc · · Score: 1

    actually... I have the Creative Zen Nomad (the 40 gig version of this) and it was only $250 and I love the thing... the interface isn't quite that of the iPod.... but for the price reduction its great.... the interface software isnt bad at all either....

  86. How many CDs do you have? by mellon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you're like me, you've purchased over 100 of them, despite the fact that they cost >$10 each. I didn't buy them all at once, but if you look at the aggregate cost, it is pretty staggering.

    Anyway, we have a 5G iPod from the first batch Apple released, and it's mostly full of dharma teachings, with a few albums, most of which I ripped from my CD collection. So it's actually pretty easy to fill these things up. I don't know how many people are using them to store Dharma teachings, but I can say that in my Dharma group there are a *ton* of iPods, despite the fact that most of us aren't exactly rolling in it.

    1. Re:How many CDs do you have? by Trifthen · · Score: 1
      "... but if you look at the aggregate cost, it is pretty staggering."

      Not really. Used CD stores, friends that want to sell part of their collection, the old "join BMG and quit after buying 2 CDs, ad infinitum" trick, and so on. I've accumulated a pretty fair amount of Music this way, and ripped it all to MP3. I don't download music, as having a nice shiny CD always at hand gives me comfort; nobody can accuse me of stealing music. I've never paid full retail for a CD if I could avoid it.

      Now DVDs on the other hand... Aside from pawn shops (usually $5 per DVD, but low selection) and game stores that sell used DVDs who don't really cut the price that much, I need to figure out a way to get them on the cheap. ^_^

      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    2. Re:How many CDs do you have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      despite the fact that most of us aren't exactly rolling in it

      No, I'd say your "Dharma group" is really rolling in it.

    3. Re:How many CDs do you have? by demi · · Score: 1

      I believe at Wall*Mart you can three copies of TimeCop for $18.98.

      --
      demi
    4. Re:How many CDs do you have? by mellon · · Score: 1

      No, I'd say your "Dharma group" is really rolling in it.

      Would that it were so.

  87. Seamless integration. by JaF893 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seamless integration?
    Have a look here at the compatible music stores. It is drag and drop comptible with Windows Explorer and is Microsoft "Plays For Sure" compatible.

    1. Re:Seamless integration. by gotr00t · · Score: 1

      Right, like everything Microsoft ever promised actually came out to be true. Note how every music store in the "plays for sure" list combined do not even have a fraction of the revenue of iTMS.

    2. Re:Seamless integration. by the+quick+brown+fox · · Score: 1

      What in the world does revenue have to do with anything? Shouldn't it be about selection, price, codec/bitrate, and possibly DRM technology?

  88. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the stated requirement doesn't mean anything. My Creative player (Muvo 2) works without any problems under Linux, even though Windows is "required". So your initial comment was not fair to the question asked.

  89. No thanks.... by Monf · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I bought a Nomad Jukebox Zen NX 20 GB Digital Audio Player last Xmas, and the hard drive in it crashed while my kid was flying back to his mom's.

    I checked the FAQ's they had at Creative, and one of the questions was: Can I jog with my Nomad?, and the answer was: No, but you can take long leisurely walks with it.....

    So I got an iPod instead, and except for Job's habit of keeping everything a secret: like the DRM (which Real reversed-engineered - thank god for sleazy companies...), I'm pretty happy with it.

    I know this is going up against the mini-pod, but if this thing is as FRAGILE as the older disk based nomads, i'd stay away... Besides, you can get a a set of headphones with a built-in fm radio for like a buck -http://www.wholesaledirectonline.com/ec215.html uhoh- this poor guys gonna get /.ed now...

    --
    Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
    1. Re:No thanks.... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      The hard drive in your Zen wasn't manufacturered or designed by Creative.

      The new Zen uses the a 5GB Segate CF drive. Evidently it's pretty durable.

    2. Re:No thanks.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simply because you issue the dire warning of an impending ./, I will not click that link.

    3. Re:No thanks.... by Monf · · Score: 1
      I understand that Creative didn't put out the hard drive, but their engineers approved its use, and then continued to sell them knowing they were failing at an alarmingly high rate.

      I've bought lots of Creative products, and the main problem I've seen is that usually they are shoddily built and they don't stand behind them: with the Zen I had, they told me I had to return it to the seller- obviously they had dumped what they had left, because they don't care if you get stuck with a piece of shit product with their name on it... (IMHO)

      Maybe they've changed, we'll have to see. But, while I'll be a guinea pig for some new things, I won't be one for something from Creative...

      --
      Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
  90. dedicated players going away? by ramar · · Score: 1

    I'm glad to finally see a resemblance of competition in the mp3 player market, even if the consensus is the iPod is still marginally better. If nothing else, it'll keep Apple on their toes and drive more innovation.

    You gotta wonder how long of a lifespan the dedicated mp3 player will have though, as memory prices drop and other devices such as mobile phones start incorporating mp3 functionality for nearly free.

    I think there will always be a market for dedicated mp3 players- especially as their prices and sizes continue to shrink (who wants to strap their treo to their arm when they go jogging?), but they manufacturers need to think about what they can do to make them more useful while they wait for technology (MRAM) to allow for sweeter hardware. Apple's photo iPod is a step in the right direction, even if it is considered a failure- next gen players better have more wizbang.

  91. Re:Linux Support Confirmed - Gnomad2 doesnt work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, Gnomad2 doesn't work with this device under Ubuntu, tried that (someone else confirmed that on another slashdot post but don't know if they were using Ubuntu), only earlier devices work because Creative changed the protocols. My code has only been tested under Ubuntu though, since Ubuntu is my development platform of choice. I will setup a sourceforge project called Ubunomad (self descriptive huh) where I will dump my code.

  92. USB Mass Storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creative seems to imply it does behave as a mass storage device:

    "Functions as an external hard drive for backup of computer files"

    From the bullet point list on their features page.

  93. "Better" does not always mean "killer" by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    In business, just because something is better does not always mean it is the killer of the current king. One easy example would be to compare Windows to other OSes. Sure this is open for debate, but many consider the Mac OS to be a much more robust OS than Windows. Windows however controls the market. Just because Apple may introduce an even better OS next year, you won't hear anybody claiming it to be a "Windows killer". Same with the new versions of desktop Linux. Or we could go back in history and look at Beta vs. VHS.

    The point being, Apple has achieved phenomenal success with the iPod. There are a slew of mp3 players out there that are probably better than the iPod in many ways. However, Apple has integrated the iPod with iTunes for a seemless user experience. Not only that, but the iPod is THE de facto standard. When you want a cotton swab, you ask for a Q-tip. When you want a bandage, you ask for a Band-Aide. When you want a digital player, you ask for an iPod. There are alternatives out there, and some may be better...but that doesn't make it a "killer"

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  94. lol by hdd · · Score: 1
    "There's no need to go round in circles with the ZEN MICRO's intuitive Vertical Touch Pad."

    isn't that suppose to be the best/most unique feature on ipod?

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
  95. Whoops... by Monf · · Score: 1
    Sorry, wrong link:

    these http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item =5730188928&category=40138 are what I was talking about....

    --
    Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
  96. Re:Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm loud happy with my minidisc player! As long as we're all happy!

  97. Get the Muvo Range if you need Linux.... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    IF you want Linux (or any other OS) support, get the Muvo Range.

    They appear as a simple USB Mass Storage device.

    You have the Muvo TX which is a flash player, or the Muvo2 which is a 4GB Mini iPod style HD player. and the HD interface on the Muvo2 is FAST ENOUGH (USB2.0) to actually use it as an external hard disk!

    the Zen range use the proprietry Nomad Jukebox style communications and require additional drivers.

    --
    Have a nice day!
  98. Creative makes low quality products by linuxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have bought their earlier mp3 players, speakers and other products. All of these products had one thing in common. They were of extremely poor quality. The batteries on my 6GB Nomad Jukebox lasted what seemed like 20 minutes. When you were playing music scrolling around the menus became painfully slow. Their speakers make hissy noises when powered and not connected to anything. Their software is clunky at best. I am never ever buying another Creative product.

    1. Re:Creative makes low quality products by jchandlerhall · · Score: 1

      Wow. I have the opposite experience. I have a Creative 30GB Zen NX since last christmas. I play it in my car and all day in my office and it performs pretty much flawlessly. 8-10 hours of non-stop play. Removable battery. Nothing slow (menu or bootup). It has occasionally hung upon playing a MP3 or two that I have basically ripped from DVD->audio stream->MP3 from some of my not-available-on-CD concert DVDs. I think it was my neebie use of those tools/mp3tag editor, though. And those hangs are generally after days or weeks of non-stop "shuffle" play of over 3000 songs without repeat. It's kind of hard to reproduce, so I'm not certain of the actual problem.

    2. Re:Creative makes low quality products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the batteries last 3 to 3 1/2 hours here with a jukebox 1. no where near the other reply to the parent, but then of course the jukebox 1 uses 4 AA batteries and not a lion one.

  99. But it's ugly by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    whatever the iPod is, it isn't ugly. Design goes a long way toward selling just about everything apple makes. maybe these other companies should think about hiring some decent industrial designers.

    1. Re:But it's ugly by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I see what you mean - it looks like some 80's handheld computer game.

    2. Re:But it's ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so but looks are entirely subjective so.. whatever. I think the design is very "zen" like .. the buttons on the front remind me of the calming lines and shapes of a rice pattie. Oh yes the days of my youth in vietnam, watching my mother give 10 dollar blowjobs to G.I's

  100. Tried the player, not an iPod killer by any means by gorbachev · · Score: 1

    Creative had these players prominently displayed and demoed at a recent electronics expo I went to.

    This thing looks and feels like a toy. The buttons have horrible feel to them, and do not react well at least to my fingers pressing them.

    If their target audience is 12-year-olds and younger, then I guess it'd sell well, but somehow I doubt it.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, I ruled you
  101. Ain't no way... by meme_police · · Score: 1

    ...that fugly thing is getting anywhere near me.

    --

    The meme police, They live inside of my head

    1. Re:Ain't no way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough about yo' momma.

  102. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by thunderbee · · Score: 1

    Your response failed to take into account the facts I mentioned in my post. I have mod points, but answered instead. Your failure to understand the question could be understood as a trolling attempt.

    --
    In my opinion, Scientology is a cult you should avoid.
  103. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

    Most things do not officially support Linux, but OSS developers often write thier own support. Additionally, Muvo and Zen jukebox already has Linux support so this is either supported already or would be shortly. Previous comments in other threads have said this already.

    So yes, you are a troll.

    --
    Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  104. AWSOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    errr..., iPods for soldiers!

    I can't hear you, I'm listening to my mp3 player!

    Free Zen Micro with every SS call-up notice!

  105. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You posted what systems the manufacturer of the product supports. That's a completely different question than whether linux supports the device. (Neither my ISP nor any manufacturer of any HW component I own "supports Linux" to the extent that they'd list it in the "required OS" line on the box ... that's not stopped me from using it all in Linux anyway.) This is likely what burned your karma.

  106. Re:iPod killer? by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I for one am tired of the pharse "iPod killer". The iPod is entrenched to the point that it is going to take more than a superior product to unseat it.

    The problem that rivals are having is that whilst they can easily make a product that is technically superior, they can't make a product that is asthetically superior.

    All the "iPod killers" i've seen look cheap, nasty and feel it too. Maybe if they stopped concentrating on bundling niche features and geting their price as low as possible and looked to using quality materials and a good design then people will buy it. Apple has clearly shown that people are prepared to pay more for something that looks it.

    Finally, Sony got it almost right. Their HD based MP3 players look asthetically very good. It's a pity they then threw that all away by not making it support MP3 and only having 20 gig.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  107. ok then ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they support Beo... Oh never mind!

  108. Re:Linux support? Uhhh... RTFM? by CoreyGH · · Score: 1

    I think most of us can attest that just because a computer peripheral doesn't specifically mention Linux support doesn't mean it won't work with Linux. Especially a device that only has perform generic duties; say, for instance, be a mountable external USB harddrive. The poster is simply enquiring whether or not anyone with hands on experience knows if it works with Linux. Such a flippant response is not required. Your tone was very jerk-like.

  109. Re:Linux? Doubtful. by Savafan1 · · Score: 1

    Have you actually looked for linux support? There is the libnjb that provides the interface, and I'm using Gnomad2 to deal with my Zen and the original Nomad Jukebox that I have.

  110. LOL - Who wrote this stuff by Aragorn992 · · Score: 1

    Removable, rechargeable battery ZEN MICRO's removable battery is easy to swap with another fully charged battery, there's no need to hang around waiting for your player to charge. Now you truly have the battery juice to get loose.

  111. Re:iPod killer? by geg81 · · Score: 1

    The problem that rivals are having is that whilst they can easily make a product that is technically superior, they can't make a product that is asthetically superior.

    Whether the mini iPod appeals to you is a matter of taste, as is whether you like the iPot user interface.

    In any case, I suspect Apple will be out of the iPod business within a few years: the prices will drop so low the margins will be too thin form it to be worth it.

  112. Of course they are! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

    The early adopters had two ways to fill up their iPods:

    p2p networks
    CD collections

    If you had 100 CDs, and 14 tracks a CD, and 1mb per minute, and about 3 minutes per song, so 3mb per track, or 42mb per CD, they would have roughly 4200mb of music.

    That also translates to at $12 per CD, $1,200 of music. Not so far off from your iPod mini calculation.

    If they bought all their CDs brand new at $19 a cd, that's $1,900 of music.

    If they had 200 CDs...
    Or compilations...

    See, iPods are dirt cheap compared to music. Some people, they have hundreds of gbs of legit music. Imagine someone who bought 5 CDs a month for 10 years; that's 60 CDs a year, or 600 CDs in 10 years. If 100CDs is 4gb, then 600 CDs is 24gb easily. And if you bought more than 5CDs a year... well, the cost of an MP3 player doesn't really amount to much at all.

    1. Re:Of course they are! by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Not just CD's. Now that I have a convenient digital player (a Neuros in my case), I've digitized favorites from my moribund cassette tape collection. As a side benefit, I can burn a CD from my tapes an stick it in the 200 CD carousel changer.

      I unboxed the old phonograph to convert my vinyl, but the old turntable died during those years in storage!

  113. Somewhere... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are a set of buttons missing a graphing calculator...

  114. Re:iPod killer? by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

    > I for one am tired of the pharse "iPod killer".

    Yes, I'm tired of this pharse as well.

    DJCC

  115. what's zen about it? by joethebastard · · Score: 1

    maybe i'm just being anal-retentive or something, but i won't buy a product named after a religion. a company with a name like "creative" should be able to do better... i mean, if they called it the "Jesus Micro" people would get really upset.

    is it just me?

    1. Re:what's zen about it? by ralf1 · · Score: 1

      http://www.novell.com/products/zenworks/

      --
      "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
  116. Re:Colors are nice - AM Radio by fear025 · · Score: 1

    That's a good point.

    Does anyone know why they left out AM Radio?

    Is it really that much more expensive to put it in?

  117. Since when... by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

    is selling multiple colors of a product a nickable "Feature"? I think the last guy to consider color irrelevant in product marketing was *Henry Ford*...

    Gee, maybe they should apply for a business patent.

    Claimed: A device or product, available in multiple colors, such that the customer might buy a white one, or possibly (!) a *blue* or *pink* one!

    Sadly, someone's probably already filed it. ;)

  118. Why no standard mass-storage support? by Rattencremesuppe · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know a serious reason why companies like Creative don't implement standard mass storage protocols in their MP3 players? This isn't even related to DRM, so it must be plain ignorance.

    A friend of mine purchased a Creative MP3 player and was very upset that he had to install some special software to transfer files. Sometimes you want to transfer files from/to work, university, etc. and you don't want to install software there (or you don't even have the option).

    1. Re:Why no standard mass-storage support? by L-ViS · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wondered that too, and went with the iAudio M3 instead. It's usable as a removable USB storage device (no drivers needed for Win/Lin/Mac), comes with MP3, WMA, Ogg and FLAC support. Oh, and 40GB in a slim pack that looks better than the iPod. Works like a charm for me.

      L-ViS

  119. Earth to Slashdot... PODCASTING! by phildog · · Score: 1

    Could anyone tell me why Slashdot has seemingly dozens of these ipod-killer stories every month, but has done just one front page item on podcasting?

    The last few months have given birth to a brand new form of media, and the "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters" site is still just pimping products with years-old technology.

    I'm here every day, and will continue to come every day but that doesn't mean I'm happy. Perhaps the ThinkGeek influence is stronger than I previously believed and Slashdot is slowly becoming a PCMagazine clone.

    --
    slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
  120. Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as sin.

  121. here here! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I encode all my cd's as BIl's. I didn't like ogg, wma, mp3, aac, flac ect. So I wrote my own damn file format. I won't buy a player until it lets me load my own codac in. Whats the point of having a closed source player play an open sourced codac? If they were both open we wouldn't have this problem!

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  122. brand new we're retro by meehawl · · Score: 1

    just one front page item on podcasting?

    Because "podcasting" is just a rehash of internet streaming audio, which has been around for a decade? Finally Mac people have a few programs that can record streams and they think it's nirvana.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:brand new we're retro by phildog · · Score: 1

      >Because "podcasting" is just a rehash of internet streaming audio, which has been around for a decade? Not sure why you would take the time to bash something you clearly haven't tried. You just need to subscribe to a show or two (I use ipodder and enjoy Adam Curry's Daily Source Code). Then listen to a couple of shows while you are away from your computer (important--do this while commuting or walking or something). Any mp3 player will do. Then get back to me. And I don't own a mac. I use WinXP Pro and an ipod mini for this.

      --
      slashsearch.org - slashdot search. powered by google.
  123. Somebody explain... by drgreg911 · · Score: 1

    what an 'ipod-killer' is? Never heard that term before...

  124. Your Day Just Brightened by meehawl · · Score: 1

    All these different portable players are great, but how do we deal with our libraries? My library is fully managed by iTunes, but is primarily MP3 (I don't import using AAC).

    Yes, iTunes support for multi formats is rather... limited. Try something like Media Center - I've yet to find a format (audio or video) it can't manage. If your collection is fully tagged then transferring to another jukebox software should be relatively painless.

    --

    Da Blog
  125. iTunes - okay for freeware by meehawl · · Score: 1

    iPod was popular before the music store. It's iTunes itself. The killer app for organizing your music. Nobody does it better or simpler.

    The fact that you think this is probably because you haven't tried Media Center.

    --

    Da Blog
  126. Proposial for relabeling - "iPod Victims" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Another iPod killer? It sure seems like so far the better term would be "iPod victim".

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  127. Do you own no CD's? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's really easy to have enough music to fill up even the larger ones. All it takes is a CD collection that is twenty years in the making, and a bunch of other random audio stuff you might want to hear (like lectures).

    It's also not quite as expensive as you might think - sometimes whole CD's on iTunes might have 20+ songs but still go for $10. A number of compilations are like that.

    Besides, is it so staggering when you computer the total cost of a large CD or record collection? Not at all!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  128. No, technology is only one of the reasons by gotr00t · · Score: 1
    The iPod, clearly being more expensive and shipping with less features than its competetors still maintains its lead on the market not because it has better technology, better aesthetics or value. It is this way because of mentality.

    Whether you like it or not, the iPod is firmly entrenched in society all over the world as _the_ digital audio player to have. Sure it is not the best deal, but people will still want it no matter what new features the competetors have. Imagine a kid whose friends wore a particular brand of shoes that were more expensive, and not necessarily of better quality or style than some other brands. Would this kid want to buy brand A, or some other brand that nobody had any recognition for?

    What does this mean then? It means that no matter what the competetion (iRiver, Creative, Dell, et. al) creates, they will not dethrone the iPod from its leading position for a long time, unless they can somehow alter the collective mindset of several million people.

    Call it a trend, fad, or whatever, but there is absolutely no chance that any of these "iPod killers" will kill the iPod (mini included) this holiday season.

    1. Re:No, technology is only one of the reasons by MidnightLog · · Score: 1

      No, Creative's objective is to sell enough MP3 players this holiday season to increase "mindshare". If they can do that for a couple years then they'll be able to come out with a real "iPod killer".

      --

      To understand what's right and wrong, the lawyers work in shifts ...

  129. The size of a giga by Andr0s · · Score: 1

    OK, I just have to, because this annoying habit seems to be a very popular theme with modern hardware marketers. Quote from the article:

    1 GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes. Available capacity will be less. Reported capacity will vary.

    First.
    1 GB =/= 1,000,000,000 bytes.
    1 GB = 1024 MB
    1 MB = 1024 KB
    1 KB = 1024 bytes

    1024*1024*1024 =/= 1,000,000,000
    1024*1024*1024 = 1,073,741,824

    Second, if advertised capacity is 5 GB, why will available capacity be less? 'This car? Yes, sir. 220MPH. Of course, available speed will be less.' ???

    Third. Reported capacity will vary? Why? I thought we have SI system to establish -precise- measurement units. 'Yes, sir. Tank capacity of 50 galons. A bit less if you tank at Texaco pumps.

    So what the bloody heck is the idea with all this 'will be less' 'may vary' etc?

    You wanna buy a pound of gold? (1 lb = 2 oz) ?

    --
    '...computers in the future may have only 1000 vacuum tubes and perhaps weigh 1.5 tons...' Popular Mechanics, 03/49'
    1. Re:The size of a giga by phowardcom · · Score: 1

      They are probably refering to the unfortmatted capacity of the disk.

      Even on a PC if you install a 80GB hard disk and format it under Windows using NTFS then you will only get roughly 76GB or so available to use on the drive.

      This is because the formatting takes up some of the space.

      The Disk has to know where all the files on it are so it creates an area on the disk that acts as a catalogue.

      Also depending on the disk format some files take up more room than you might think.

      If the disk is formatted with 32K clusters (not going to go that technical here to describe all of the settings with cluisters etc) and a file is saved that is 33K then it will take up 64K space on the disk.

      hence why on windowss machine you can look at the properties of a file and it'll say something along the lines of size: 1024K size on disk: 1298K

      This is why the actual amount of storage may vary depending on what is stored on the device.

      --
      www.phoward.com - www.corrigenda.org
    2. Re:The size of a giga by servoled · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean GiB instead of GB.

      1 GB = 10^9 Bytes
      1 GiB = 2^30 Bytes

      --
      "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
  130. No thanks. by chrisbro · · Score: 1

    Seems pretty damned ugly, to me. The buttons aren't nearly as intuitive as the iPod's, to boot. "No need to go running around in circles?" Pardon? At least I don't have to take my thumb off the iPod in order to scroll through things quickly. And "curved to fit?" Curved to fit what? Seems like they're stretching it a bit, there.

    I'm viewing these "iPod-killers" as filling the same role that third parties do in America; to add new ideas so that the big players can pick them up for continued dominance. I just don't see the iPod going anywhere soon, given its dominance, intuitive interface, integration with one of the best MP3 players out there, and its "hip" factor.

  131. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why was this comment rated as a troll? Seemed pretty much on the mark to me.

  132. iPloders Knee Jerk Reaction by tomwhore · · Score: 1

    Another mp3 device another chance for the drinkers of Apples Koolaid to do a Carl Rove.

    "its ugly" - No my friend your reactionary knee jerk is ugly, so is the consumer attitude spewed by the iPlod zealotry.

    "it wont work with iTunes" - Since when does having to work with an AOL style service (You pay for what we tell you to do) come into play. If anything folks shouldbe happy not to be tied to a DRM stuffed albatros like iTunes.

    "i am an ipod user and therefor ..." - Hey cool at least your letting us know up front you have partaken of the koolaid.

    Wake up consumer sheeple, think differnt....for a change.

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  133. drinking and getting laid. by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Everybody needs a drink and needs to get laid. So quit stating the obvious.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  134. I won't be buying a Creative MP3 player again... by b0bby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...since my Nomad IIc died, and I discovered that it only came with a 3 month warantee, and it had only been (lightly) used for under a year. I might try another cheapo brand, but that's it for Creative in my book. You'd hope that a solid state device might last a bit longer than a cassette walkman, but I still have a late 80's boodoo kahn that's going strong. I'd like an iPod, but I really can't justify the price.

  135. iPot? by thegnu · · Score: 1

    >>...iPot user interface.

    Don't forget to mention the recent upgrade from a phosphor/striking surface interface to a flint/scroll wheel. The new iPot is so intuitive, a child could use it. :-)

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  136. I know this is not the sole point of your post but by thegnu · · Score: 1

    ...the Mac OS is not a direct competitor with Windows, regardless of what people think. It is illegal to install it on 3rd party hardware. And it runs on different processor architecture.

    So, competitor yes, but not like the Zen competes with the iPod.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  137. Zen means quietude in Chinese by thegnu · · Score: 1

    Zen is only a religion if you interpret it that way. The Zen Micro is more like an Orthodox Micro.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  138. Re:Killer? hardly by chochos · · Score: 1

    I think GP means "if there was anything to listen to on FM, THEN XM And Sirius wouldn't have a business plan". Just another way of saying "who gives a fuck if this thing has FM, there's nothing worth listening to on it"

  139. Zen and 1394 with Linux? by BroncoInCalifornia · · Score: 1
    sudo apt-get install gnomad2 Password:

    I did this with my simplyMepis desktop. It works!! It warks!!

    But I have to use a USB. Does anyone know how to get gnomad2 to connect with the firewire? After modprobe ohci1394 I could see the Zen thing with the KDE GUI but gnomad2 could only find it with a USB connection.

    --

    Religion is the main cause of atheism.

  140. Re:iPod killer? by chochos · · Score: 3, Funny

    This has probably been said before a lot before, but... THIS is a real iPod Killer. Under $20, too.

  141. False dichotomy by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    You can be a geek who cares about the better product and buy and use an iPod with AAC as the iPod is a better product and AAC is the better standard (than MP3). And if you want lossless, the iPod ALSO supports ALE, which is either AAC Lossless Encoding or Apple Lossless Encoding.

    The benefits of Ogg are patent encumbrance... and patent encumbrance.

    If you care about low bitrates on portable devices, you might as well get the next bigger version of the iPod instead ^^

  142. Its faster and easier. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Thats the point. You might not need to do it very often, but when you do, for whatever reason, its simple. That is the point. Maybe it doens't matter to you, but it does to other people. Its sort of like me disparaging the usefullness of an airbag, because I've never needed one. Probely because I'm the best driver in the world, and so are all of my friends.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  143. Re:iPod killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't take it personally. It's usually just enthusiasts who use this term and it's used across industries. Take, for instance, the 1990's Ferrari F40 which had a top speed of 200mph. Then when the Lamborghini Diablo was introduced months later, and had a top speed of 202mph, it was called "The F40 killer".

  144. The Register says it's a USB Mass Storage Device by ballermann · · Score: 2, Informative
    The Register says:
    The Micro will also operate as a USB Mass Storage device, allowing users to store other files on its hard drive.
    ... so it should be supported by linux.
    --

    Need a Wiki? Check out DokuWiki

  145. Isn't the ipod older then apple music store? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I might be wrong but I seem to remember that the ipod was there before the music store.

    I also know a lot of people with mp3 players and absolutly no-one who buys music online. Might have something to do with being dutch.

    I think that a good mp3 player needs just to work your OS. I got a creative zen and a iriver one but I must say that I now mostly use the iriver. It just appears as an extra drive under windows. What can be easier to manage.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  146. Could Ogg be supported by Nemesis099 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For everyone who is into Ogg and wants it to be included in a MP3 player I just want to ask a few questions.

    Ogg is under continuous development where they go on a quality system and as they compress better and better the files of the same quality get smaller.

    If this is true then if a player supported Ogg format would it need an upgrade to play an Ogg file created 2 years from now?

    I'm just curious if this is true since I'm looking to rip my CDs but I'm not sure what to rip them to.

  147. FUGLY by raam · · Score: 1

    No hipster dufus would be caught dead with something that ugly. It's about how it looks, after all (snideness more than implied).

  148. PENALTY by ChuckleBug · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but you have been docked one Karma Unit for using the phrase "seamless integration." I invoke the fair use clause of the Anti-Trite-Marketingbabble Law to protect myself from penalty for having quoted the Illegal Phrase.

    It is permissible to use the Approved Word "SEMPRINI" as a placeholder for an Illegal Word or Phrase. Thank you for your attention.

  149. Getting tired, get an iriver by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    There are companies that support OGG and there are companies that do not. Apple doesn't feel it needs to and neither does creative. Not their kind of market. Maybe this will change like Sony is now supporting mp3 but I doubt it.

    So if you want OGG buy from a company that supports it in its current players.

    For linux support try to find a player that is really just an usb storage device wich just happens to be able to read its own contents. Many of the smaller companies are not going to bother making their own. They just buy a usb storage solution and built their player around it. The more generic their chosen USB storage the more likely someone somewhere will have written a driver for it. Some rio models are supported probably because they were the first popular ones long before anyone at Apple had seen the light.

    As for creative. Well I got their zen model and thought it was pretty good. Until I got my iriver to make up for the zens lower and lower battery life. Better sound, easier to get music on, worse button layout. Go figure.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  150. Creative's proprietary software by UnConeD · · Score: 1

    The Zen Xtra (and probably the Zen Mini too) requires a custom driver (Nomad Explorer) in order to access it and put audio and data on. Unfortunately, their program sucks: it is clunky, inconsistent and ugly. On top of that, it leaves a permanent "Nomad Explorer" icon in "My Computer" whether the device is plugged in or not.

    This effectively makes the Zen Xtra useless for carrying data files around. Even if you go through the trouble of taking the driver CD with you, you will annoy the owners of the pc's you install it on by polluting their PC with annoying crap they don't need. This could've all been prevented by designing the Zen as a removable mass-storage USB device, with the audio tagging features on top of that or with an extra application.

    When I emailed Creative about this, their reply was that "the Zen Xtra is not intended as a portable data storage device". Right. I guess someone forgot to tell them that the Zen IS a portable harddrive.

    Who comes up with this crap? Having the Zen as a standard USB mass storage device is the only sane thing to do. If they hadn't crippled it, I would be plugging in the Zen into friend's and families' PCs, doing their marketing for them.

  151. Too many devices ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have solved my music problems by buying a Nokia 6230 and an expanded MMC card for it. Sure its not as feature reach as dedicated MP3 players, but I *always* have it with me. I update the songs via bluetooth before I go somewhere and ave no troubles !

    The best bit is that I dont miss my phone calls because I cant hear it ringing ...

  152. Not good enough by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    I am in the same problem sort off. I also don't have the cd anymore and their new version of playcenter is bugged in that it uses some crap MS database wich it says is not installed. A known bug and creative is doing nothing to solve it.

    Their are ways around it but there shouldn't have to be. Creative is really getting weird. Worst thing? For some reason my pc always played a vid of the creative logo while booting until I ripped the software apart. WTF is with them? Soundblaster used to be a decent card but the company behind them got marketing mad.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  153. Re:iPod killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's quite a few 'ipod killers' out already. It's just the mainstream person is too stupid to realise it and buys into apple's brainwashing schemes hook, line, and sinker. Christ, look at half the twits on this message board. I can just see them walking around like zombies with thier lobotomy scars, drooling and moaning while pointing at their ipods.

  154. SIGH.... by mblase · · Score: 1

    Is that you can rip out the DRM. I refuse to buy anything that has DRM such that if the company goes under I'm stuck.

    For the zillionth time, Slashdotters: if you're worried about the DRM, burn an audio CD-R as a backup. iTunes lets you do this, and it's pretty generous about it, too.

    This is basically the same as whining that your product key for Windows is written down on a piece of paper, so if the paper gets lost or burned or chewed apart by rabid wolves, you're screwed for life. Just make a second copy, you nitwit.

    1. Re:SIGH.... by ShawnDoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's the problem with that. Apple gives you files that have been compressed with a lossy compression method. When you burn the files to CD-R and then later rerip them (to say MP3) you end up adding more digital artifacts and losing more data. You don't end up with the same quality as the file you originally downloaded.

  155. Retro retro retro by meehawl · · Score: 1

    You just need to subscribe to a show or two (I use ipodder and enjoy Adam Curry's Daily Source Code). Then listen to a couple of shows while you are away from your computer (important--do this while commuting or walking or something).

    Been doing this for years with Media Center's Media Scheduler. Got several hundred of my favourite shows preserved for posterity and occasional listening (Essential Mix, Breezeblock, Left Right and Centre, etc). Thanks very much but there's nothing new to see her, moving right along. By the way, I think I recorded my first stream (Real Audio) and transcoded it into low mp3 bitrate for listening on an mp3 player around 1998 or so. Welcome to the party!

    Seeing that Media Center is codec agnostic and does video as well, it is nice to be able to timeshift video from the web as well. I can download shows or upload from the ReplayTV. Audio is easy and a problem solved years ago. Video is more challnging but it's sure nice to be able to check out last night's Daily Show while commuting.

    --

    Da Blog