Slashdot Mirror


The Typo Millionaires

theodp writes "Slate's Paul Boutin reports on the sordid history of the oldest scam on the Internet. For almost as long as the Web has existed, there's been a thriving economy of sites, services, and software vying to grab you as soon as your mistype a URL. Studies estimate that 10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped, adding up to at least 20 million wrong numbers per day, helping to enrich the likes of porn purveyors, ISP's, Paxfire, Microsoft and VeriSign."

308 comments

  1. An anonymous, underground internet? by caluml · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interested in joining an anonymous, underground internet?
    http://meta.fshell.org/

    1. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an interesting idea that I have been wondering about for some time. However, when people start saying things like "don't tell anyone how you got in" that does not make me feel comfortable. It's the whole security by obscurity thing.

      I mean, if it were truely a great design then why not switch the entire Internet? A good design can handle the load. A good design is still secure (or anonymous) even if everyone used it.

      Are there any other "nets inside the Net" out there?

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    2. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by caluml · · Score: 1

      If anyone has any questions, I suggest that they come in, and ask them there.

    3. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure.

      While these folk have used the 10.x.x.x range for their tunnels I've been busy setting up gateways in the 192.168.x.x range. Feel free to connect and explore but try and avoid the infamous 127.0.0.1 gateway; there there be nothing but hardcore pr0n.

    4. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      It looks like they are using the 10.0.0.0/8 adress space which is only 16777214 adresses large in the best case.

    5. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft!

    6. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      I'm going to give this a try... if it works on windows :) If not, I'll do it later only...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    7. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Erm, yep.
      There are plenty more /8s left unassigned by Iana if they get stuck though.

    8. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by vally_the_poo · · Score: 4, Funny

      George W. Bush was right finally: there are internets !! Woaw, that will change my all life man !

    9. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      if it works on windows


      If you go in there running Windows, they'll lynch you.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Looks good, however, they are using 10.0.0.0/8

      They would have honestly been better off just using a big chunk of currenly unassigned IANA space... because like it or not, 10.0.0.0 is private space, and actually in use in some form or another all over the place in corporate and personal networks.

    11. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      ahah. Who cares? :D

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    12. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by rxmd · · Score: 2, Informative

      They might have been better of using IPv6. Seeing they're tunneling it over IPv4 anyway, this would rid them of all addressing problems.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    13. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSSHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
      No, but in all seriousness I logged in last night for the first time. Its not bad. They have their own DNS servers as well as their own webservers, ftp, mail, etc. They DON'T mind windows users and welcome all to join. They can easily expand beyond the 10 range and use their personal computers for the routers. The ping is pretty bad (1000ms) but it isn't really noticeable. They support bittorrent and everyone is anonymous apon connecting.
      I looked at it pretty extensively last night and never came accross any objectionable material (child porn, etc) although their is music and movie servers (expect 15kb/up). The way they have it setup is using a 6-d hypercube model for the routers. They have a pretty nice design that they can show you but remember to be nice. Your best way to get info is through the IRC channels and everyone their has always been nice. They need more routers to help improve their network and are always looking for volunteers.

      Quick points:
      Do not talk about yourself or where your from (the whole point of being anonymous)
      Do not ask where others are from (they'll just ignore the question)
      And for crying out loud STOP POSTING THESE LINKS ON /.!

      The whole point of invite only is to weed out the script kiddies and other such lusers.

    14. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by caluml · · Score: 1

      Yep - just grab a /8 that's not currently allocated rather than use the defacto /8 for private networks.

    15. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16777214 addresses covers those I'd like see allowed to join.

    16. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by mindstrm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To make it worse, 10.0.0.0/8 is reserved for private use.. which means it's in ACTIVE use by tons of private networks all over, which makes it wholly unsuitable for a shadow internet. A far better choice would have been to simply hijack a /8 that's still unassigned.

    17. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep it child porn fiend only, eh?

    18. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by owlstead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Very interesting idea, but is it possible to use the same technology to create a virtual LAN, just for my friends? I'm not so sure that I trust all these anonymous people to be honest, and not wreak havoc. A virtual LAN to my friends though would be a big plus (and a very bad dream for the record industry), next to the real internet of course.

    19. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but why? I mean you could just set up a shell server and you got everything.

    20. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Fortyseven · · Score: 1

      Why, are you lookin'?

    21. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for crying out loud STOP POSTING THESE LINKS ON /.!

      That won't work forever. Word of mouth and all. Once the box is open, there is no way to close it.

      The meta network can't survive without more people.

    22. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There have always been internets. An internet is simply several LANs connected via IP routers. Somewhere along the line one big huge internet formed that we refer to as the Internet (notice the capitalization). Today other internets are usually referred to as "intranets".

    23. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but the point of keeping it word of mouth is to keep the GNAA folks out.

    24. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by recursiv · · Score: 1

      I can't. I failed the aptitude test.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    25. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by recursiv · · Score: 1

      It works. I had to take some creative diversions from the given directions, but I got in.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    26. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A friend of mine told me about that "Metanet" a while ago. I went in and chatted some and looked around. Here are my thoughts.
      • There is no one on it. There is nothing there, and it's invite only so there probably will never be much there unless that policy is changed.
      • They rely on "don't tell anyone" type tactics to try and stay under the radar. Sorry, ain't gonna happen on a usable network with many people. Besides, you want lots of people otherwise there is no content.
      • They sound a lot like some of the little kiddie hacking/cracking groups. They have their little clique and everyone thinks they are so cool (very leet teenage like).
      • It's obvious by all the above that they barely have any experience or idea of what they are doing. Sorry, can't trust that.

      I never went back. The idea is interesting but it needs to be done by people who know what they are doing and it should be easy to use by anyone.

      Don't even mention that piece of crap known as Freenet.
    27. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that ws sortof the impreession i got as well.. tell me when u got a fast full IPv6 network with encryption, otherwse ..... YAWN

    28. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of the irc severs work, the only one that responds to ping will not allow connection on port 6667.

      have I done soething wrong or is this just the slashdot effect?

    29. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your VPN is not connected. check your routes and stuff.

      with that said, it isn't worth it. move along, nothing to see here.

    30. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Disregard. Upon further consideration, I did not fail the aptitude test.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    31. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

      Ah, so thats where the underground was hiding! Success!

      --
      Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
    32. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSJ:
      "Sorry, Homer"
      "but what about.."
      "it says No HomerSSS"

      posting anonymously because THIS internet isn't very anonymous.

    33. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I'll bite. From your link: "However, if you're happy with things currently, go back to your pap-fed, TV-induced brain-numbing stupor, and smile at the nice pretty pictures, the short snappy soundbites, and cower in fear at the Fox news alerts, and feel free not to engage." In other words, this "underground internet" (what a joke!) is run by arogant idiots who say that EVERYONE who don't use their network is a corporate tool watching TV anf Fox News all day? Um, excuse me but how exactly using your elite "underground internet" will make me safe from TV? Because you know, watching TV has nothing to do with the Internet. Also, the whole idea is laughable. You are more anonymous than on the Internet because we won't tell anyone who you are! Um, tell me again, where am I more anonymous? In a public crowded place where I can go anywhere, or in a secret club? And even if it WAS a good idea (which it isn't) I couldn't use it anyway because my ISP uses 10.0.0.0 for their NAT! So please tell me, why the hell do you use a PRIVATE RESERVED subnet for your "internet" instead of IPv6? This whole idea is stupid and caluml is either trolling or karma-whoring. This is not the first time slashdot is spammed with those stupid "underground internet" links and notice that most of the answers to people asking about it are from ACs. It's just a useless VPN developed by incompetent kids who think that separating from the entire world somehow makes them "elite". Pathetic.

    34. Re:An anonymous, underground internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't even mention that piece of crap known as Freenet.

      At least the freenet people don't have an attitude problem.

  2. Great by suprchunk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I am poorer than I originally thought? Damn.

  3. What you need, when you need it by Inda · · Score: 2, Funny

    I see no problem. :)

    Slashdit
    What you need, when you need it

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:What you need, when you need it by darkov · · Score: 2, Funny

      I prefer slashot.com. Check out the "related categories". They certainly understand their market.

    2. Re:What you need, when you need it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try www.slasgdot.org - it's some sort of right-wing paranoia site.

      I found it by accident.

    3. Re:What you need, when you need it by sxtxixtxcxh · · Score: 2, Funny

      i found a left-wing paranoia site at "slashdot.org" ...

      --
      for a minute there, i lost myself...
  4. 10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As are 75% of all hand-entered /. submissions.

    1. Re:10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by darkov · · Score: 4, Funny

      As are 100% of /. comments.

    2. Re:10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by brianber · · Score: 1

      And it would appear that Slate's editors weren't paying attention, either, that or the "your mistype a URL" was on purpose. The submission was cut/pasted from tfa.

    3. Re:10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by jkendrick · · Score: 1

      This has always been the case and most recently the principle has carried over to eBay with free services like Fat Fingers that lets you search for items listed on eBay that have been misspelled.

      --
      jk
    4. Re:10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by nmnilsson · · Score: 2, Funny

      I assume you mean cmoments?
      ( or you'd have to adjust your percentage? :p )

      --
      No sig to see here. Move along.
    5. Re:10-20% of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped by WeblionX · · Score: 1

      He just forgot a decimal point.

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
  5. For years it has been done by simple individuals by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real problem is when an institution like Verisign does this kind of stuff. Many ISPs put some thing in their zones that shouldn't be there, the problem is when a root server does it.

    ICANN Should put his pants on and take action.

    ALMAFUERTE

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  6. 20 percent?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a lot of traffic for http://slasdot.org/

    1. Re:20 percent?... by xott · · Score: 1

      and I'd quite like to register Lashdot.
      It sounds like a groovy site.

    2. Re:20 percent?... by Xeo+024 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, 20%, huh?

      People really have to stop typing with one hand.

  7. Fortunately... by rbarreira · · Score: 1, Interesting

    we geeks have little risk of that happening to us, since decent typists (like we should be) are looking at the screen while typing, instead of looking at the keyboard...

    --

    The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    1. Re:Fortunately... by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      decent typists (like we should be) are looking at the screen while typing

      But if the typo occurs in the last few characters of a URL, then even the best typist might not notice it before pressing Enter.

    2. Re:Fortunately... by swiggidy · · Score: 1

      Or, you can type the URL into google, then if it's wrong Google tells you and offers a better answer. This way you don't even have to be careful.

    3. Re:Fortunately... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Sadly, my hands aren't transparent, so I can't see the whole keyboard and use it at the same time.

      --
      I don't get it.
  8. *cough* by colmore · · Score: 1

    http://lsashdot.org/

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    1. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I suppose you think we type sl or s[ret]l several times a day instead of ls? Nope, not us slashfolk, never, not once!

    2. Re:*cough* by operagost · · Score: 1

      http:///..org

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  9. Beginner Users by Aneurysm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a shame that the people who are probably more likely to mis-type a URL and not notice/tell the difference are probably beginner users of the internet. These people are also perhaps more likely to fall for scams such as downloading trojans etc. I work as an IT trainer teaching older people how to use computers, and many of them are unable to tell the difference between typing something into a search engine, and typing something into an address box. They are definately the people that don't know that mis-typing a URL actually makes much of a difference, and I have seen many of them attempt to install malware, just because the install box has popped up, and they have no idea what to do with it.

    1. Re:Beginner Users by perkr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed, my parents have very little clue on stuff like that. Actually I think awareness of scams and security basics like an URL is an "address" and things you type in a search engine are search times should probably be on the priority list for an "learning to use computers" curricullum, esp. for older users.

    2. Re:Beginner Users by Aneurysm · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's true, I teach primarily for Microsoft Office. The module that we run that people have more trouble with than anything else is the internet, simply because of the amount of acronyms/jargon that is used. One question asks them to find out some information about three different ISPs. Invariably on their first attempt they come up with Google, Yahoo and AOL. It takes some of the older students weeks to learn the difference between ISP and search engine.

    3. Re:Beginner Users by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, that would explain the link to slsahdot.org in the article below. Those people that type URL's wrong are all lusers. They probably get internet access just to be able to read slsahdot.org, that must be ti. Whoops where I go.

    4. Re:Beginner Users by E_elven · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about "ISP is the company you pay your Internet bill to"?

      --
      Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
    5. Re:Beginner Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must deal with more advanced beginners. A lot of people I know have no idea what that is for, or that you can type into it.

    6. Re:Beginner Users by Aneurysm · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much what I say. But then you have the problem that they identify the term ISP ONLY with the ISP they personally use. They don't realise that there are more than one ISP, and then you're nearly back to square one. Also many of them don't even own computers, much less have the internet at home.

    7. Re:Beginner Users by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      ...many of them are unable to tell the difference between typing something into a search engine, and typing something into an address box.

      I see this all the time, even with people who seem tech-savvy enough to know better. I don't know how many times I've heard, "I typed 'blahblah.com into AOL Search and it wasn't there!" I don't know why this bugs me so much. I give up trying to explain the difference. I guess they are less likely to wind up at one of the scam sites as in the article.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    8. Re:Beginner Users by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      many of them are unable to tell the difference between typing something into a search engine, and typing something into an address box.

      I just noticed last week that if I type my primary keywords ("piping" and "design" without the quotes) into the address box of Firefox it takes me directly to my own webpage instead of returning some kind of error message or search results page for the subject matter. Obviously, Firefox is jumping straight to the #1 Google result, but why should this be happening?

  10. not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I remember the time several years back when I read about people registering misspelled web addresses. So I thought I'd take a look, and tried the first spelling mistake I thought of, www.hotmale.com.

    I've been very careful since about what I type.

    1. Re:not new by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 1

      www.hotmale.com...

      Ha! I saw a kid do this while attempting to check his mail at a High School I was working at. The shock nearly knocked him out of his chair and his friends had a great time teasing him about it.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    2. Re:not new by NayDizz · · Score: 1

      I'm quite fond of http://www.whitehouse.org

    3. Re:not new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember the time several years back when I read about people registering misspelled web addresses. So I thought I'd take a look, and tried the first spelling mistake I thought of, www.hotmale.com.

      And would you believe that I was thinking about buying it when it was still available? I though: thirty bucks? Ah, what's the point... Then, some years later during the dot-com boom I was seeing similar domains on auctions sold for six-digit sums of money. Not buying that domain was the stupidest decision in my entire pointless life.

    4. Re:not new by bluprint · · Score: 1

      True story, I know a girl, that was teaching at a summer camp for kids. (She was in school at the time, and is now a regular teacher...). These were young kids...maybe 10ish I think...maybe a little older, I don't remember. Anyway, they were teaching them how to use email. She told them to type in hotmail.com in their browsers. Sure enough, one of the kids typed "male" instead of "mail"...needless to say, she freaked out and was very careful about what she told them to do after that.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
  11. slashdot by digitalchinky · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I recall once typing in slashdot.org, (incorrectly) and ended up at a site displaying nice frequency/time graphs of how often that occured. (A lot)

    I wish I could remember what it was - I think salshdot.org - (now just a black page with an automatic redirect)

    One of those milk through the nose moments.

    1. Re:slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of the most excellent, but since long shut down, altavisa.com.

      At the top was the sentence "This is not Altavista.com" in large letters, followed by "Can't find what you're looking for on the Internet?" and "Learn to type *fast* and *well*", both followed by "Check out these books which happen to be on sale now!".

      Good stuff.

    2. Re:slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever happened to SALSADOT.ORG ???

      "It's SPICY!!"

  12. Studies? by strider44 · · Score: 1

    "Various studies have estimated that 10 percent to 20 percent of all hand-entered URLs are mistyped"

    Surely that number is slightly exagerated there? My personal score would be well under 1%, and I practically live on the internet. That's a lot of URLs that I type.

    Especially with the drop-down menus telling URLs that start with the letters you are typing, I don't see how people could mistype that many URLs.

    1. Re:Studies? by rbarreira · · Score: 1
      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Studies? by zeux · · Score: 4, Informative

      I work for a company that exploits mistyped URLs.

      From our business, we found that a dial up user does an average of 4 bad requests a month and a broadband user an average of 10.

    3. Re:Studies? by Black+Perl · · Score: 1

      Surely that number is slightly exagerated there?

      Oops! A typo. That should be "exaggerated"

      My personal score would be well under 1%

      The evidence you provide refutes your claim.

      --
      bp
    4. Re:Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My personal score would be well under 1%, and I practically live on the internet."

      uhuh....? were you better when you were a novice?

      "That's a lot of URLs that I type."

      yippee?

      "Especially with the drop-down menus telling URLs that start with the letters you are typing,"

      The ones that save you from HAND_ENTERING them?

      "I don't see how people could mistype that many URLs."

      Can you see how many fingers I'm holding up?

    5. Re:Studies? by AssFace · · Score: 1

      Do you honestly go through life and look at published statistics and think "huh, well I don't do that, therefore this whole study's end numbers must be wrong"?

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    6. Re:Studies? by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      My personal score is well under 1% as well, which means there's ALOT of people that are compensating for our lack of typos.

      I had trouble believing it, until I remembered one huge demographic: kids 11-16. IM session:

      "Uhm, did u reed hw assmint 2nyte?"

      "Yep, sed sthng bout web sight called www.wallstjernal

    7. Re:Studies? by TelJanin · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of kids 5-12.

    8. Re:Studies? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Do you know the ironic thing there? I first typed in exaggerated, and then thought "no that doesn't look right!" and deleted one of the gs. So basically my typing is alright, I just can't spell.

    9. Re:Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but misspellings are included as typos in the statistics, as there's no way to distinguish between them.

    10. Re:Studies? by strider44 · · Score: 1

      so you think me misspelling exaggerated is similar to me mistyping Google?

      Google, Slashdot, BBSpot, Fark, Penny-Arcade, PVPOnline, all the sites I visit frequently, aren't easily misspelled words (they are the sites I visit most commonly), and I don't think I've ever typed in the wrong domain name because of bad spelling.

      www.exaggerated.com isn't a real site. I don't see how me misspelling exaggerated refutes my argument.

    11. Re:Studies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google, Slashdot, BBSpot, Fark, Penny-Arcade, PVPOnline, all the sites I visit frequently... blah blah blah

      So what?

      www.exaggerated.com isn't a real site. I don't see how me misspelling exaggerated refutes my argument.

      Reading this thread, it seems that your argument was a 99% typing accuracy claim. The responder pointed out your post was a trifle less. I took it as a humour bit.

  13. Google are kings at this by essreenim · · Score: 2, Interesting
    enter ww.google.com instead of www.google.com - same result

    And put an extra 'o' in:

    www.gooogle.com - same result

    1. Re:Google are kings at this by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      if ww.google.com gives you anything other than google then you're infected with something.

      google.com is owned by Google, any subdomains (like www. and ww.) are also owned by Google. If something is redirecting ww.google.com then you need to run a spyware scanner, check your hosts file, or simply use a better browser.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    2. Re:Google are kings at this by kd5ujz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try www.466453.com
      This is Google spelled out on a touch tone phone.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    3. Re:Google are kings at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget http://www.gewgle.com and http://www.g00g13.com

    4. Re:Google are kings at this by ysegalov · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but try goggle.com (be sure to put your browser in max security mode!)

    5. Re:Google are kings at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. ww.google.com gets me to www.google.co.uk

      Does it know where I live, or is it the same for everyone?

    6. Re:Google are kings at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My favorite is http://cheesemuffin.info

      How the fuck that's supposed to equal "Google", I've no clue. But apparently it does!

    7. Re:Google are kings at this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't know to laugh or cry on this one....

      Part of me says "He/She is being funny", the other part says "Yes, some people are really that stupid."

    8. Re:Google are kings at this by pete314159 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      http://www.g00g13.com/
      m4d 1337 534rch 5k1llz!

      --
      If your toast does not accquire any kind of royalty, please do not contact us. We can't help you.
    9. Re:Google are kings at this by knodi · · Score: 1

      Try this one, too:
      http://1089053032/

      Convert any IP to an 8-digit hex #, concatenate the digits, and convert back to decimal.

      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    10. Re:Google are kings at this by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google owns that domain because of their search-by-number (T9 equivilent) service for mobile phones. It's easier to enter 466453 on a mobile phone than it is to enter "google".

    11. Re:Google are kings at this by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Not on a nokia. I have to hold each number down for 1.5-2 seconds to get a number. With predictive text, it is a LOT faster than entering numbers.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    12. Re:Google are kings at this by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Try numbers mode. It works on my 3590.

  14. It's true. by tektek · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's hard typing correctly all the time with only one hand free. ;)

    1. Re:It's true. by fishlet · · Score: 1

      Dude.... get a woman :-)
      or at least some good speech recognition software.

    2. Re:It's true. by brianber · · Score: 1

      I broke my friggin' arm you insensetive clod!!!!!

    3. Re:It's true. by fireheadca · · Score: 1

      > I broke my friggin' arm you insensetive clod!!!!! By typing with only one hand? Calm down a bit.

    4. Re:It's true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor man, were you in the war?

  15. Not just typos... by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Informative

    This goes way beyond typos. There is a whole cottage industry of people registering domain names that unwary site owners allow to expire. I've heard several stories of church groups who accidentally let their domain expire and within a matter of days it had teen porn on it.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Not just typos... by darkov · · Score: 4, Funny

      Really? I just though it was where you went for teen porn. Do you think I attended a Christian youth group for the singing and praying?

    2. Re:Not just typos... by onion2k · · Score: 1

      Other way round in my case. Ooer.com used to be porn, and now its my homepage. Its great to have a short, pronouncable URI.. but I suffer a lot of spam all coming to someone called "Cecile Lover". :S

    3. Re:Not just typos... by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      I had that happen to me; I stopped updating the website I'd had for >3 years, forgot to renew, and the domain was immediately snapped up by a porn site.

    4. Re:Not just typos... by ajna · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It happened to me. I let a domain expire since I didn't want it anymore, and it was immediately snatched up by a miscreant who set up a referral redirect to a porn site. At this time I complained to my registrar about this but was unsuccessful in persuading them that anything was wrong with this practice.

      However, the next month the domain-snatcher made a mistake by putting up a text version of my real page, with all links stripped except for three referrals at the bottom. At this point I was able to successfully petition my registrar to return control of the domain to me since he was clearly violating my copyright on my site's text and layout.

      As it turns out he was doing this to many people. From an email from the registrar:

      If it is any consolation, this does not appear to have been directed at
      you specifically, and rather appears to be a pattern that this
      individual was grabbing hosts as they expired and using them to increase
      search engine rankings of their linked pages. You helped key us in to
      that, and we have freed up a large number of hosts that they were using
      to this end.
    5. Re:Not just typos... by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, I got some very surprised messages shortly therafter..

  16. Well by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    no ads on slsshdot, but it is for sale for all you porn vendors who target geeks who cannot type properly.

    1. Re:Well by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Including me since I cannot type http correctly

    2. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who wants the domain. It's a bunch of geeks that don't impulse buy. They hate fraud and SPAM. Besides, if you tick them off, they may take your website down and run up your bandwidth costs and maybe even get you kicked off your ISP.

      I'd rather target pubecent losers than a a bunch of Sysadmin's ;-)

      Posting Anon to prevent getting run out of town for mentinoning a venurable target.

      Disclaimer; I don't run any website, so no I don't troll for kids.

  17. Zappos by strider44 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shoe shoppers who mistype www.zappos.com as wwwzappos.com get pictures of women who are wearing shoes but not much else.

    Unfortunately, though Slate's servers are well hardened against DOS attacks such as what slashdot inflicts, since every slashdotter who will read that quote will instantly type in wwwzappos.com into his URL bar, the servers of that site will fall under the weight of the 80% of slashdotters who get that URL correct.

    1. Re:Zappos by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      the servers of that site will fall under the weight of the 80% of slashdotters who get that URL correct.

      80% of the Slashdotters that view the article, you mean.

      So that knocks it down to 1%? No, that's too high.

    2. Re:Zappos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see any shoes. Where are the shoes??

  18. I can't imagine it's that great by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

    When one is trying to accomplish a task, ending up at the wrong site is a distraction, not necessarily a hot, sweaty tangent.

    Just because someone ends up on a porn site doesn't necessarily mean that they'll instantly stop what they're doing and start beating off.

    I imagine we would have read about this behavior in business journals by now if it were the case.

    1. Re:I can't imagine it's that great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone ends up on a porn site doesn't necessarily mean that they'll instantly stop what they're doing and start beating off.

      erm.

      *look around guiltily*

    2. Re:I can't imagine it's that great by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Just because someone ends up on a porn site doesn't necessarily mean that they'll instantly stop what they're doing and start beating off.

      When your name is 'Fear the Clam', I can see why you'd think that.

    3. Re:I can't imagine it's that great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offices would certainly be more interesting..

  19. Plugin For Spell Check by BlackberryCool · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is there a plug-in to have whatever you type spellchecked or suggested, something like Google Suggest.

    1. Re:Plugin For Spell Check by FluffyArmada · · Score: 0

      Thats actually a REALLY good idea. You should email someone at google so they can get the interlectual property rights before microsoft tries to exploit them. :)

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro. Then isn't congress the opposite of progress?
  20. Thats understandable... by fishlet · · Score: 1

    Because it's just so easy to mistype goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooogle

    1. Re:Thats understandable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So just in case, google registered gogle.com and gooogle.com, but once you get to four, the typo exploiters start coming

  21. misstypes by ngc.for.life · · Score: 1

    If you misstype a street in your map software, you may end up at the other side of the city which will cost you money. Misswrite your checks and lose money as well. The problem are not the URLs but websites behind such URLs that copy the original site. Especially unwanted with online banking and e-stores. It's always the same. If it's about your money. -> pay attetion.

    1. Re:misstypes by Technician · · Score: 1

      The problem are not the URLs but websites behind such URLs that copy the original site.

      Bzzt.. It's the advertisers that support these sleaseballs. If the advertisers refused these sites, they would go away except for the phising sites.

      Maybe they are doing us a favor by snatching up the domains to serve ads so phishers do not register them for phishing instead.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  22. White House by ectotherm · · Score: 3, Funny

    www.whitehouse.gov: Current President's home www.whitehouse.com: Former President Clinton's home ;)

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
    1. Re:White House by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

      Funny comment, but you've got to wonder about the whole premise of this slashdot article. How is it possible that there's a sizable group of people who would sit down at the computer to look up, say, some research on american politics, and then when they mistype a URL and end up looking at a screen full of naked people decide "what the hell, might as well buy some porn instead"? It just doesn't make any sense...

      --
      Fuck it
    2. Re:White House by eric1207 · · Score: 1

      http://whitehouse.net

    3. Re:White House by imkonen · · Score: 1
      I've wondered that too. I guess it's kind of like the spam phenomenon: It's cheap enough to set up, the profit margin on the few successful pitches makes up for thousands of people who just go on their way? I think there's just a tendancy to underestimate the effectiveness of annoying advertising.

      What really makes me wonder is the dude mentioned in the article trying to trick children with misspellings of CartoonNetwork.com etc. I mean WTF was he thinking? Doesn't his target audience not have credit cards for the most part?

  23. Favorite mis-typed URLs? by chiph · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mine is localhost.com

    Those guys must be making a killing from people hitting ctrl-enter by mistake.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This isn't a misspelling, but I wonder about the website ©.com. I didn't even know you could register something like that.

      Hope it shows up correctly on your screen, if not it's copyright symbol dot com.

      AFTER PREVIEW: looks like the text shows up fine, but /. stripped the symbol out of the link. You'll have to copy-paste the URL, or type it yourself.

      --
      Fuck it
    2. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The link didn't work, but using copy and paste, I got the site to come up.

      That's very interesting, I wonder if I could register http:///..org ?

    3. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by Gwyn_232 · · Score: 1

      That address doesn't work. It must have been slashdotted!

    4. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by chiph · · Score: 1

      Do a whois. It's owned by Wraith Enterprises in Austin, TX.

      Chip H.

    5. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by bedessen · · Score: 1

      Domain names are ascii-only. What you are seeing is an example of IDN which includes a scheme to convert unicode into ascii so that you can have domain names with localized characters. The actual domain is http://xn--gba.com/ which is what (copyright symbol).com translates to in punycode.

    6. Re:Favorite mis-typed URLs? by Matt+Apple · · Score: 1

      I own MemoryHole.com(which is currently defunct). Perhaps you may have heard of TheMemoryHole.org(I had not heard of it until after I bought my domain name, honest).

      Not only did I get mistyped URL traffic from them but I also got the occasional misaddressed email. You can imagine that the email they get is rather interesting! When I realized I was getting email intended for someone else I would politely inform the sender. But sometimes they would argue with me! "No my friend said it was Memory Hole!"

  24. google spell checker anyone? by SPravin · · Score: 1

    One simple solution to this problem is to use Google spellchecker to good use. I always type URLs in my google box and let google lead me to the page, even if I know the URL. Probably just because I believe Google more than I do my own typing skills..

    - PS

  25. Good for them, sounds pretty smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the guy who created the "I don't care" and "I don't know" long distance company. When people made calls and were asked who the caller wanted to use, this guy got all the business.

  26. Re: mistyped slashdot url by nikmal · · Score: 5, Informative
  27. solution - buy all typo domains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had enough money, you could buy as many typo-domains as possible. Even though your visitors may be confused as to why the domain they entered linked to your website, it would keep them from getting the the pop-up hell.

    1. Re:solution - buy all typo domains by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      There in lies the "scam" part of it!

      Right now domain names are treated like "phone numbers" where exact spelling is all that is maintained without expensive legal process. imagine the fall-out if somebody was allowed to "choose" a phone number "1-digit off" from a church for a porn line! While it happens by phone company paperwork, they do try hard to prevent it...

      The situation is compounded when the domain registers are actively registering the domain names like yours for a profit! It's the equivelant of your phone company actively choosing all the misdialed numbers for your church and choosing to put porn on those numbers... and then voulanteering to "sell" you those extra lines for exorberant fees. It would never be tolerated in "normal" circumstance but because it's "internet" for some mistaken reason it's OK.

      It's much the same as why Google is being sued in France. They're profiting from selling ad space to other people's tradmarks... Imaging googling for "slashdot.org" and having two pages of advertizing before you got to "slashdot.org"! I google's case it's a little more murky because you don't HAVE to use their private service..but in the case of Verisign and such you are buying the "name" with expectation that YOU will profit from it....and they are taking your money, AND profiting from the dilution of what they sold you!!

  28. Is it really a "true" scam? by lxt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is most of this really a scam though? It seems to me there are two levels to this type of behavior - the true scam, whereby a user is led to believe the site they are looking at really is the site they intended to go to, and therefore handing over personal details / card numbers etc.

    However, most of what is described appears to be people capitalising on poor typing skills - a "lesser" scam if you will. I suspect the majority of these miss-spelt domain names don't claim to be the site you're looking for.

    A scam is, after all, to defraud somebody. Mis-spelt domain names is akin to reading a map incorrectly, and ending up somewhere you didn't expect.

    Of course, the fact that many of these sites will then go on to install malicious software etc, and that they generally intend to catch traffic from other sites probably works against this argument.

  29. switch by mpower1 · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft rejiggered Internet Explorer so that if you type in a URL that doesn't exist, the browser will redirect you to a Microsoft page. " This alone is reason enough to switch to firefox.

  30. Can I get that with extra o's? by Agret · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google have prevention for this type of thing on their site by registering multiple domains.

    http://www.gooogle.com/
    http://www.googlee.com/
    http://www.googlle.com/

    Word!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:Can I get that with extra o's? by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

      http://www.googlle.com/

      The last one there sends you to one of those fake search sites.

      --
      If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    2. Re:Can I get that with extra o's? by Agret · · Score: 1

      oops - I must've copied the wrong one, there was another one I had open. Oh well nevermind you get the idea :)

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    3. Re:Can I get that with extra o's? by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Try going to Google Suggest and type in "goooo" in the search field for some true goooooooooooooogle results ;)

      "lolol" has the same effect. So does punctuation such as "....." for that matter.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    4. Re:Can I get that with extra o's? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      However, they missed goggle.com

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
  31. TLD typos too by northcat · · Score: 1

    This also happens when people forget which TLD a website has. Like suprnova.com .

    1. Re:TLD typos too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yupp, happens to me as well.

      I've registered a .net domain name with 5 characters starting with n (n????.net).
      Now some business on another continent started using the same name with .com.
      Since then, every now and then people type the wrong ending (I guess because of the n's) and I get mail intended for the .com domain.

  32. This is actually somewhat scary... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you follow http://www.slahsdot.org/ it's almost the same site but there's "wrestling women" as the most popular link. Does that mean slash dotters have this affinity for buff chicks? We need a psychologist in here...

  33. The Google Trademark by Xeo+024 · · Score: 1

    Google goes after people who register domain names with the word "Google" in it or any variant of it. It also registers hundreds of domains that can be considered common typos, such as "gooogle.com" or "gogle.com."

    It's not only typos, but entire names that people take advantage of, for example people can register names such as google-search.com (inactive) and use the name to attract (trick?) gullible visitors. The typo problem only exists as a subordinate to the larger trademark issue at hand.

    1. Re:The Google Trademark by bob_jordan · · Score: 0

      "Google goes after [voelspriet.nl] people who register domain names with the word "Google" in it or any variant of it."

      I wonder how they find them.

      Oh wait .....

      Bob.

  34. MOD PARENT UP by Agret · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up. I do not have mod points.
    Re: Grandparent, I don't see how you can quote "a lot" for how often. The site records a record number of 35 people spelling it wrong.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would make me the grandparent, for a website that I typed by accident, 35 hits or so a day is 'a lot' in my little tiny world opinion :-)

      Actually, you are totally right, I did try to research prior to posting, but couldn't remember the link, so I more or less tried to make it sound 'bigger' than it really was. I think I lied.

      Apologies.

  35. New Poll? by brianber · · Score: 2, Funny
    How do you type?

    Hunt and peck.

    Use proper form but look at the keys

    Don't look at the keys

    Speech recognitin softwar wurks fur we

    I don't have hands you insensitive clod!!

    I dictate everthing to CowboyNeal

    Right now, I've got a broken arm, so everything is one handed. Normally, though, I look at the keys.

    1. Re:New Poll? by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      Seems cool to me :D Go ahead and propose it ;)

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:New Poll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look at the kb, just like you had to do on the C64 with extended ASCII and needed to slide somebody an Ale at the Red Dragon Inn.
      Besides, I still type way faster than I think.

    3. Re:New Poll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      than I /can/ think. See what I mean?

    4. Re:New Poll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he can think faster, but usually don't?

  36. Re: mistyped slashdot url by sploo22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great... now let's watch it go down in flames.

    I have a feeling they should switch to a bigger scale on those graphs. :)

    --
    Karma: Segmentation fault (tried to dereference a null post)
  37. Re: mistyped slashdot url by Skater · · Score: 1

    There goes their statistics! ;)

  38. Look to the monitor and not the keyboard. by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    That dumb people that look to the kyeboadr when type.....

  39. Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by reallocate · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...many of them are unable to tell the difference between typing something into a search engine, and typing something into an address box.

    Both boxes look pretty much the same.

    What you're highlighting is the imlicit expectation among software designers that users will come to understand the how the Internet works. That is, that users will understand what a URL is, how DNS works, what a search engine is, and ehat happens when you enter a search phrase versus entering a URL.

    Those are unwarranted expectations. An analogy would be cars designed on the assumption that drivers understand how internal combustion engines work. Few of us would be able to drive safely if that was a prerequisite.

    The most effective way to protect users from crooks and abusers on the net is to design software that does the protecting and is not based on unreasonable assumptions about user knowledge.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  40. Re: mistyped slashdot url by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  41. A friend of mine.. by iONiUM · · Score: 2, Interesting

    does this. He owns easily over a few thousand miss-spells, and offers services to buy up expired domains. There's really 2 tricks to this service.
    The first is to have a program to find domains that expire, and find them the day of expiry so you can pick them up before others trying to do the same. Of course, some domains will do better (ie. miss-spell of slashdot) than others (ie. miss-spell of some joe-blow site).
    The second is to target the material on it to the types of visitors it would get. Of course, with the new domain ad pages from google, it makes this really easy. This is a huge business, honestly, you have no idea how many people, when they get to the wrong page, go through and click on an advertisement.

    So how well does this do? He makes 6 figures canadian a year on it, and that's not including business derived from his own programs to find expired domains. Furthermore, he's my age (22) and still in university. How can you argue with something that brings that type of money for doing so little work?

    1. Re:A friend of mine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      So how well does this do? He makes 6 figures canadian a year on it...

      That's like what... 1000 USD/year? Not bad.

    2. Re:A friend of mine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you were kidding, but it's more like $85,000 US.

    3. Re:A friend of mine.. by mph · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's like what... 1000 USD/year? Not bad.
      1999 called. They want their joke, and their strong US dollar, back.
    4. Re:A friend of mine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if your friend is mark a. from manitoba i'm going to have a chat with him...

    5. Re:A friend of mine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How can you argue with something that brings that type of money for doing so little work?
      /With a knife/.
    6. Re:A friend of mine.. by bigberk · · Score: 1

      unless your friend is exceedingly careful, it looks like he might violate google's policy so it seems like risky business. I also don't know if google would have recourse to collect back from you earnings even after they have been paid.

    7. Re:A friend of mine.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1999 called. They want their joke, and their strong US dollar, back.

      You're using a tired, cliche'd joke to ridicule someone else's tired, cliche'd joke? Brilliant there, Poindexter. And I'll bet the irony is completely over your head...

    8. Re:A friend of mine.. by nick8325 · · Score: 1

      That's like what... 10^1000 USD/year? Not bad. ;-)

  42. Re: mistyped slashdot url by rxmd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Here you are.

    --
    As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
  43. Not just URL's by lildogie · · Score: 3, Informative

    AT&T had a national collect-calling campaign telling people to "Dial 1-800-Operator."

    A competitor, MCI IIRC, quickly snatched up the number 1-800-Operater and got lots of the business from the campaign.

    So it's not just URL's that get the typo business.

    1. Re:Not just URL's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand. Why would they advertise a telephone number they don't own?

    2. Re:Not just URL's by nettdata · · Score: 1

      look closer... advertised was "or", while some people were mistakenly calling "er".

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
  44. Misspellings - Suggested For "slashdot": by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

    Slashdot don't need to register another domains because all the users here don't look to keyboard when typing.

  45. this is how by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is how I found out about slashdong.org

  46. My solution to the problem by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

    When you buy a domain, you have to justify why you're choosing it and it can't be "that's what we sell". Should kill off cybersquatters and these typo-profiteers. But what do I expect? People like Verisign won't implement it because it's too profitible to do what their doing (and children possibly being exposed to pornography be damned)

  47. Seem to me that much more than this is .... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    ... counting on human error in order to profit by.

    Hmmm, as an example.... war on iraq for oil....

    credit card promotional interest rates and the untentional failure (honestly forgetting) to make a payment, or not knowing that transfers at 0% or low rates while having higher rate debit ... where the lower rate gets paid off first -- increasing compounded interest on teh higher rate... etc..

    I have no doubt that as a matter of insured payoff, to invest in human failure is a successful investment practice.

    I'm sure better than the stock market scamming of the public,

    1. Re:Seem to me that much more than this is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usual, you make no fucking sense at all. Why do you keep bothering us with your inane crap?

    2. Re:Seem to me that much more than this is .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the comp.sys.amiga hierachy is no longer big enough to fully contain his ego?

  48. Hotmail vs. Hotmale by iXiXi · · Score: 5, Funny

    This isn't a fat finger mistake but a funny story. This lady that I worked with was Internet illiterate. She wanted to set up an e-mail address so she could send junk home that was personal in nature. She had trouble with her ISP e-mail and no one at work wanted to volunteer to intercede and help out. I told here to just go to hotmail.com and set up an account for free. She went to hotmale.com and started screaming !! She thought she would be fired on the spot...I had to get the President, John, to help calm her down...hell she was almost 66 years old. Never saw anything like that I guess. /snicker

  49. Not just Microsoft by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

    There's another typo-squatting game that only the big guys can play. In 2001, Microsoft rejiggered Internet Explorer so that if you type in a URL that doesn't exist, the browser will redirect you to a Microsoft page.

    *Cough*Verisign SiteFinder*cough*

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    1. Re:Not just Microsoft by m50d · · Score: 1

      There's a name we have for software which redirects you to their site when a url you type can't be found. We call it spyware.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Not just Microsoft by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Or, in the case of IE, we call it "shit". :-)

      I actually didn't catch that the author goes on to mention SiteFinger two lines down...

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  50. I seem to recall by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Salshdot.org used to put slashdot in a frame with a banner ad up top. Taco got a lot of hate mail from that one.

  51. Re: mistyped slashdot url by bairy · · Score: 1

    That's the last time they feed that buffalo some curry

    --


    Get paid to search..It's geniune and
  52. This type of behavoir by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    can get you sent to prison. A dude made porn sites that were common typos of Disney and Disney names, ie targetting children. He got thrown in jail....

  53. perfect example why kids need to be protected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I made this embarassing mistake myself today:
    actual fansite
    and one letter off when your brain has not had enough coffee yet:
    not safe for work

    Fortunately I was not at work!
    What happens when kids do this by accident :-(

    Since anyone can do this, from now on when I see an unregistered typo I am going to buy it and point it back to the real site for them. I can spare the $7 to protect minors. What would happen if we all did that to help a local school, charity or other cause - it can add up!

    1. Re:perfect example why kids need to be protected by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Why would the kids you want to 'protect' be allowed to watch "Desperate Housewives" in the first place?

      If you want to spend zillions of your own $$$ on protecting the children, that's your business. Why not spend it on educating parents on how to monitor what their kids look at on the internet?

      Treat the cause, not the symptom. Look at the countless "War on _____" the government has failed at for what not to do.

    2. Re:perfect example why kids need to be protected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a point about getting parents more involved with their kids but still, it's the same logic to why you protect electrical outlets for babies. You protect the dangerous stuff first, get them to stop being curious about outlets second. A parent can't be with the kids 100% of the time.

      Don't get me wrong, it's not like I am saying the government should be buying the typo domains or anything like that. I am simply saying that as long as this "loophole" exists, and we happen to spot the potential for abuse, why not interceed if it's that easy. Last domain I registered took all of 2 minutes. It feels good to do something empowered like that - it's not like you can't yell at a parent you see neglicting their kids and immediately patch that problem right up.

    3. Re:perfect example why kids need to be protected by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Here is something else you might want to consider in today's extra-litigious society. Registering 'look-alike' domains may set you up to be sued for trademark infringement by the very corporation you are helping by your efforts.

      At the very least, you could be hit for 'squatting' and find yourself in court over that.

      No good deed goes unpunished. See the girls who got sued for bringing cookies to neighbors, or mikerowesoft.com for various examples.

      I find this whole subject to be increasingly moot everyday, as more people use Google or other search pages, type in the first few letters, and click the first result.

      Don't get me wrong. Anyone doing something selfless is refreshing. Just don't be surprised if it is misinterpreted as nefarious intent.

  54. I wonder by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if you could make any money doing something like this over the telephone. It would work like this. Register an 800 number very similar to some other high traffic number, like one belonging to Visa, Or some other frequently called company, and play an advertisement everytime someone calls. It's much easier to mistype a phone number as many phones don't allow you to see what numbers you actually typed, or dialed in.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:I wonder by rjamestaylor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Go4it. But remember, you're paying a fee each time someone dials. If you're successful you'll be broke.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    2. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The best example of this is when AT&T started a service at 1-800-OPERATOR, MCI registered 1-800-OPERATER and got a fair chunk of their buisness.

    3. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant to say somewhere in his post that he would be SELLING the advertising. He could very well make a profit if he could sell enough advertising.

    4. Re:I wonder by aduzik · · Score: 4, Funny
      JERRY: Well wait a second, don't you see that's 555-FILK.
      KRAMER: What's Filk?
      JERRY: Filk's nothing, but 555-FILM is Movie Phone.
      KRAMER: Oh Movie Phone.
      JERRY: Yes, so people are just dialing it by mistake and getting you.
      KRAMER: So, I'm Filk?
      JERRY: You're Filk.
      KRAMER: Oh, Mama.
      --
      If it's not one thing it's your mother.
    5. Re:I wonder by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
      I knew what he meant. And I also know how (un)profitable unintentially viewed, unexpected advertising can be. There's nothing like pissing on people's porches to sell them a vacuum cleaner.


      I stand by my comment.

      --
      -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    6. Re:I wonder by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I actually had this problem happen to me unintentionally.

      There was a porn 1-800 number that was identical to my phone number, except that my phone number was located in the Salt Lake City (UT) area code---801.

      Needless to say, I got some very interesting phone calls, especially when the number appears in a German magazine. Generally it was a little bit of fun, and a chance to embarass the callers, especially when I put my three-year-old son on the line.

      The phone calls ended when my area code changed due to redrawing the phone district and adding a new area code to my state, and the fact that I moved to a new telephone exchange neighborhood.

      At the moment my phone number is identical escept for one digit to a local grocery store, where I get phone calls for grocery delivery and occasionally some kids trying to call their friends while they are at work. The senior citizens who can't seem to dial the correct number is kinda sad, and I try to be patient with them and not piss them off.

      There was one time, however, that this one person call up and wanted to give a customer complaint. My wife answered it and tried to explain she called the wrong number. This lady who called was so irate that she insisted my wife transfer me to her "supervisor". I ended up talking to the lady and saying "How can I help you?" and took the complaint. I then tried to assure her that the problem would not happen again, and she shut up.

      I get about 2-3 calls per week due to this phone number similarity, but I try to avoid really making fun up the people calling up.

  55. Precisions by zeux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh and we work at the DNS level with DNS NXDOMAIN anwsers.

    That means that these figures I gave in the parent post DO NOT include mistyped URLs going to a registered domain (ie www.gooogle.com which is a domain that does exist) and all the errors caught by msn.com under Internet Explorer and google.com under Firefox.

    Also, we only care about HTTP traffic.

    That explains maybe the difference between our numbers and the 10% to 20% the studies found...

    1. Re:Precisions by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is why when I type in "o" to have the autofill put in Orkut that if I hit enter too quickly and it just registers "o" it takes me to O'Reily's website. Do I have spyware? Cuz nothing is turning up on Spybot and Adaware.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    2. Re:Precisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's an unfortunate effect of Firefox. Combining a semi-working auto-complete function and Google's "I'm feeling lucky" means that most one letter addressed typed in the address line will pull out crap. Type "s" and you'll get Hoover's or McDonald's, depending on their respective ranking on google. More suspicious is if you type in "a" and get alltheweb's search function.

    3. Re:Precisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes your browser will take a few seconds to look through its recent list to find a match for "o". In firefox when you put something into the address bar that isn't a valid URL it autogooles and goes to the I feel lucky result: the first one.

  56. Re: mistyped slashdot url by ghoti · · Score: 1

    Well they _could_ distinguish between people misspelling slashdot and a link, by simply checking for the referrer info in the HTTP request. But then, they probably didn't expect anybody to post a link on slashdot ;)

    But the weekly pattern is interesting. Looks almost too regular to be true ...

    --
    EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
  57. Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    at a boom-era party in silicon valley, i met a woman who'd goosed her income by developing software that took a list of the most-visited web sites, calculated the most likely typos that surfers would make trying to reach them, and automatically registered those domains if they were available

  58. Their Fault (was Re:Not just typos...) by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    Karma be damned....

    I have no sympathy for them. It's their fault their domain expired normally and someone else bought it up. That's why it's always best to renew at least a few days before the domain expires, or at least have payment information on-file so that a domain can be renewed automatically.

    Now, I do remember reading about a particular domain that was hijacked by another registrar/company in Australia. It was on Slashdot, but for the life of me I can't remember the URL.

  59. Slutdot.org by Cumstien · · Score: 2, Funny

    A lot of times I end up at slutdot.org, but it's not becuase I don't know how to type.

  60. Speaking of typos by Bootle · · Score: 0

    Don't ever go to www.dicks.com when you're looking for hockey supplies... they don't have sporting goods...

  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. Microsoft redirect by nfsilkey · · Score: 1

    I have seen WYSIWYG editors consistently muck up URLs, such as http://http//google.com. Can anyone tell me why this redirects to microsoft.com?

    1. Re:Microsoft redirect by belarm314 · · Score: 1

      Because you're using Internet Explorer?

      --
      When moderating, assume I have not yet had my coffee.
    2. Re:Microsoft redirect by jamesbuko · · Score: 0

      nope, even with firefox it goes to ms

    3. Re:Microsoft redirect by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Safari complains that it can't find the server "http". It's probably Windows - I expect Firefox uses Windows' DNS rather than reimplementing it.

    4. Re:Microsoft redirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, same with firefox on linux

    5. Re:Microsoft redirect by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      I get some crap by searchmachine.com or something like that. I suspect it varies depending on who your DNS server is paid to pimp^H^H^H^H redirect malformed requests for...

  63. I second that by mofochickamo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also had the same idea about the same site. I thought it would be funny to see what was there. Now I am emotionally scarred and, since I'm a Californian, I'm thinking about suing.

    --
    Honk if you're horny.
  64. Re: mistyped slashdot url by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fun to go there and hit refresh over and over, and watch the numbers climb.

    I know, I know - simple minds are easily amused.

  65. Should the title be... by saddino · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...The Typo Milionaires? ;-)

    1. Re:Should the title be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it should, but the Slashdot editors messed it up.

    2. Re:Should the title be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I thought it was a vanity bio of CmdrTaco ;-)

  66. Yep, even former U.S. President candidates! by antdude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I posted a story on AQFL about it:

    "Former U.S. President candidates' Web sites can be just another place to shop for sex toys, download movies and get a law degree online in a few months...

    When politicians and Internet domain names meet, strange things happen, particularly after the campaigns are over. Click on Elizabeth Dole's old site, and you go straight to an auction of Pokemon video games on eBay. A Libertarian currently owns the original 1996 Clinton and Dole campaign Web sites, and uses them to support 2004 Libertarian presidential candidate Michael Badnarik, while also hawking Clinton and Dole's latest books.

    When asked for an explanation, a top domain-name registrar pointed out that Web site addresses are always rented and never owned, and that former owners can't dictate who picks up their discarded sites."

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  67. "anonymous" by mattdm · · Score: 1

    Of course, it's only anonymous as long as no one is looking.

  68. Google I feel lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.oreillynet.com/cs/user/view/cs_msg/4334 7

    "I used the LiveHTTPHeaders extension (see http://extensionroom.mozdev.org) and figured out that trying to go to http://http://google.com actually does a "I feel lucky" search on "http" at Google. For some reason, Google's top hit on http is Microsoft.com. Go figure"

    1. Re:Google I feel lucky by belarm314 · · Score: 1

      After actually looking at the google results page I got in galeon, I see you're right. I presumed he meant he was being redirected to MS's search page.

      Can't figure out how on earth microsoft.com is the top result for http, though.

      --
      When moderating, assume I have not yet had my coffee.
  69. Re: mistyped slashdot url by tswann01 · · Score: 1

    Obviously they don't differentiate between a manually entered URL and a link.

  70. Re: mistyped slashdot url by dourk · · Score: 1

    Gosh, I wonder why there's a spike in todays graph?

    --
    Wake up.
  71. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by iantri · · Score: 1
    Those are unwarranted expectations. An analogy would be cars designed on the assumption that drivers understand how internal combustion engines work. Few of us would be able to drive safely if that was a prerequisite.
    Since everyone loves analogies -- especially car ones -- I think a better one would be expecting people to tell the difference between a gear shift lever (on steering column) and turn signal lever. Both look pretty much the same, if you don't know what you are looking at.

    It seems reasonable enough to me to know which does what.

  72. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by SamSim · · Score: 1
    What you're highlighting is the imlicit expectation among software designers that users will come to understand the how the Internet works. That is, that users will understand what a URL is, how DNS works, what a search engine is, and ehat happens when you enter a search phrase versus entering a URL.
    Those are unwarranted expectations. An analogy would be cars designed on the assumption that drivers understand how internal combustion engines work. Few of us would be able to drive safely if that was a prerequisite.

    I disagree. Maybe one doesn't need to intricately understand the principles of internal combustion to drive a car, but the mechanics of how your accelerator works, how your different types of brakes work (and how to use them safely), how a car will react to dangerous conditions, and if you drive an automatic, the mechanics behind changing gear - these are things that nobody should get behind the wheel before understanding.

    In the same way, while the intricacies of DNS and routers and so on need not be explained to new users, there IS, undeniably, knowledge which for their own safety they should be armed with before setting foot on the internet. That spy/ad/malware exists at all is a major one. That there ARE websites out there which will claim to install neat stuff on your computer, but actually just mess it up, or feed you annoying popups. That there ARE people who will email you claiming to want to give you money when actually they want to take money away from you. That the internet not a playground, it is dangerous: that you need to stay alert for and know how to avoid this stuff.

    Not all of this is stuff we can rely on software to do for us. Education is what is needed.

  73. A solution (in firefox) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use adblock to block them!
    EG
    http://test.yesadvertising.com/*
    http: //landing.domainsponsor.com/*
    http://search.infor mation.com/*
    http://www.searchguide.com/*
    and so forth. Some of the stuff listed as examples on this site i couldn't load, because they were from these sites..

  74. If you want people to join ... by arhar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... it might not be a good idea to spew venom and arrogance from almost every sentence.

    However, if you're happy with things currently, go back to your pap-fed, TV-induced brain-numbing stupor, and smile at the nice pretty pictures, the short snappy soundbites, and cower in fear at the Fox news alerts, and feel free not to engage.

    (The instructions are deliberately vague. A sort of aptitude test, if you will.)


    After reading crap like that, I can't imagine any normal person joining this ... only the types bearing strong resemblance to Jimmy Fallon's IT guy character from Saturday Night Live ...

    1. Re:If you want people to join ... by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe the idea is that normal people don't join, don't you think?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:If you want people to join ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their security is based on "not telling people" and crap like that. that is not secure.

      kids, just inexperienced kids I bet.

    3. Re:If you want people to join ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The security lies with the routers and encrypted VPN tunnels.

    4. Re:If you want people to join ... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Normal people would do better in an invite only system, especially if they only invite friends and friends of friends. Even then, a system to track who is inviting whom would be needed to discover the dual-identity trolls who are able to maintain a "nice" identity. I've ruminated over this ever since one of my identities invited the other into GMail. BTW, I'm not a troll, but even good people like to be anonymous at times.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    5. Re:If you want people to join ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and cower in fear at the Fox news alerts

      Wow, more fox news bashing by ignorant people. What a surpise.

  75. The oldest scam on the Internet? by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    The oldest scam on the Internet is forged email, though it was more of a prank than a scam (there was a santa@north.pole.com long before there was a pole.com). The second oldest is the Make Money Fast spam, though it wasn't called spam back then.

    Typosquatting is a youngling. AFAIK, mine was the first (whitehouse.net) and that only happened in 2/96.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  76. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very insightful indeed

  77. Re: mistyped slashdot url by bagofbeans · · Score: 1

    Over 1000 hits now - soon the counter will be slashdotted!

  78. Re: mistyped slashdot url by noidentity · · Score: 1

    slsahdot.org

    According to the above link, a lot of people are misspelling slashdot.org today as compared to other days!

  79. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone drives who doesn't know what an engine is, and ascribes the car's motion to some inexplicable magic.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
  80. The problem goes beyond that by adeydas · · Score: 1

    Other than showing porn sites and selling malicious products, these 20% of the total surfers can be made the victim of credit card frauds too. Just imagine you type in something which you believe is the address of paypal and the give away your credit card number. I am sure scammers always look for possible incorrect URL's of this sort to get on with their 'business'.

  81. Panix.COM [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (This ain't Usenet!)

  82. Re: mistyped slashdot url by rtaylor · · Score: 1

    Heh.. I think you've thrown off todays numbers a little bit.

    --
    Rod Taylor
  83. No proof!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice story but bogus!

  84. I don't know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I've lost count of the number of times I've made a typo and accidentally visited hotbabes.com instead of google.com. The letters are just so damn close to each other!

  85. Nice try? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it didn't work!

    (This ain't Usenet!)

    1. Re:Nice try? by AMD4L1PH3 · · Score: 1

      Copy/paste. It works. From the website: Classifieds.US America's Free Classified Ads --> http://©.com/

  86. Best day at work by uberjoe · · Score: 1
    This reminds me of a time at work when a colleague called me with a dead monitor. I told him it was probably still under warranty and he should go to the manufacturers website. He asked me if I knew what it was, and I said to try www.acer.com. A second later I heard him practically scream in shock and revulsion at what he had seen. He was literally at a loss for words (I guess he had never seen porn before).

    Once I stopped laughing I told him he should check the spelling of his url. Then he started to get worried someone would think he had been intentionally viewing smut during work hours on the campus network. All in all a pretty good day at someone else's expense of course.

    --

    The days of the digital watch are numbered.

  87. Ad hominem time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He and his kind are scum, and should be genocided ASAP for the good of mankind IMHO!

    (This ain't Usenet)

  88. Freshmeat.com by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    Made the mistake of typing Freshmeat.com instead of Freshmeat.net a few times at work. A few years ago it was pretty raunchy.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  89. Re:i make typos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HaHa. Yes it's flamebait but damn funny flamebait. I wish I could type in shitdot but I'm at work and god knows what would come up. Mod This parent up as funny flamebait. shitdot I gotta remember that one.

  90. Holiday inn- very famous by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1-800 holiday was famous example
    1-800 h0liday (with a zero) was snatched up by a travel agency, who then booked commisionable stays at holiday inns--

    holiday inn sued and lost

    the agency never advertised as "1-800-h0liday" they just happened to have this certain # with a zero in it.-so it was not infringing on a trademark... kinda harder to do with URLS..

    more of the same here
    http://www.ivanhoffman.com/1800.html

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  91. Yahhoo.com by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to own yahhoo.com for a while. The domain was getting massive amount of unique traffic. I believe it was something like 2000 uniques per day. Then I got curious and set a catch-all email address. That got really interesting real fast...

    But I gave it up because it didn't feel right. Could have linked it to one of those search engine sites to make some decent change though... Oh well...

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
  92. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by reallocate · · Score: 1

    The problem is that its people doing nefarious things on the net. Learning how DNS works isn't going to render you immune to crooks and predators.

    Yes, there is risky terrain along the net, just as there is risky terrain along the highway. And, yes, the more you know how to navigate safely through either, the lower your risk will be.

    But safely and effectively using a browser is analagous to safely and effectively driving a car. The latter is completely possible with no knowledge of the machanics of the car's operations. Likewise, using a brower safely and effectively ought to be possible without understanding how the net works. But, cars have a 100=plus year head start on browsers. (Most people will never understand how either their car or the net works because it isn't important to them.)

    Of course, no one expects their car to keep them out of risky neighborhoods, and no one should expect their browser to keep them away from risky sites and links. The education you recommend, then, should be about how people behave on the net, not how the net works.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  93. Domainers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for a company that provides infrastructure support for these domainers ("What you want, when you want it" is the company's template page). The money is obviously made through advertising links.

    A poor choice for a domain name may pull in a few pennies per day in revenue. A good domain can pull in $3,000 per day. That's right, over a million per year. So the shotgun approach, where you register tens of thousands of misspelt domains, usually pays off in the long run.

    If a popular browser were to notice redirections to a certain number of sites, and were to block accesses to said sites, it could bring the domainer economy to its knees. So if the Mozilla foundation ever needs an emergency influx of cash...

  94. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by reallocate · · Score: 1

    Nor do I. But I know lots of people who don't know how an engine works.

    Most folks I know understand that the letters they type go out onto the net over a bunch of cables and wires and that new stuff is sent back to them. They think of it, I'm sure, as very much like a telephone network. Start talking about name resolution and packets, though, and eyes glaze over.

    Remember, people (at least non-geeks) want to learn only what they need to learn to do what they want on the net. The less to be learned, the better.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  95. Re: mistyped slashdot url by rob_squared · · Score: 1

    Of course now you're *completely* screwing up their data.

    --
    I don't get it.
  96. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are 100% incorreect. that has nothing to do with an internal combution engine, but rather driving the car (for which you should pass a test before you can drive)... it just so happens there is no internet test..is is that what is being taught at the local highschool?

  97. Re:LAN by MasterOfCeremonies · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just set up a VPN server on your computer, then get your friends to set up a VPN connection on their machines to your IP. Only allow access to trusted clients.

  98. Ask not what your .... by Presence1 · · Score: 1

    This is a core problem of our industry, and the initial responses highlight it. They just try to talk about how people *should* learn things, and try to bend the analogy.

    For the true analogy, look at the actual history of cars. Drivers were hired along with the car not only because the owners were rich, but because a car requried great skill to just operate with some modicum of safety. The engine was started with a crank, which could break your arm if you weren't careful. Almost every engine parameter had to be continually adjusted by hand. The choke had to be set and adjusted. The spark advance adjustment was typically on the steering wheel and needed continual twiddling to keep the engine running right. There was no power assist on anything.

    Today, how many drivers (other than mechanics and enthusiasts) even know about the choke and the spark advance, much less how they work? And how popular are cars now compared to 100 years ago?

    Technologists who ignore this are fools, and there are too many of them. And, just because you always gt more out of something by knowing more about it, does not mean that we should require such knowledge just for basic use. Believe it or not, some people have other things to do with their lives, and care about other stuff.

    To paraphrase Kennedy: Ask not what your customer can do for you, ask what you can do for your customer.

    To spell it out: do not ask your customer to learn your machine so she can use your (confusing and clunky) interface, ask how you can make it easier, smoother and safer for your customer to use your product.

    end rant.

    1. Re:Ask not what your .... by vandrad · · Score: 1
      To paraphrase Kennedy: Ask not what your customer can do for you, ask what you can do for your customer.

      Uh, so who's the customer of unpaid volunteer OSS coders?

      --
      Nosce Te Ipsum
    2. Re:Ask not what your .... by Presence1 · · Score: 1

      Uh, so who's the customer of unpaid volunteer OSS coders?

      Their customers are the people they hope will use their OSS software, the same as the customers of commercial products (sometimes literally the same, when OSS and commercial products compete directly).

      Customers give time and effort as well as money. This includes the time to figure out how to install the software and how to integrate it into the work or play they want to do.

      We must give them the most value we can for BOTH their money and their time and effort. The customers' time and frustration are more important than the price, whether ot not the product is free. Frustrate a customer (potential user), and they won't use your stuff. Make their life easier and they will use it. Make their life a lot easier and they'll tell ther friends.

      The ideal product is free, installs instantly and takes zero time to learn (by utilizing knowledge the user already has, and making perfect assumptions about what to hide, default settings, etc.). Of course, real products will never acieve this ideal, but we must approach it as best we can.

      The goal is the same, regardless of the product or situation. We want to make it so that as many people as possible find our product useful. This is what it takes to earn the satisfaction and rewards of a job well done, whether commercial or OSS.

  99. skashdot.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I typed this one in once by accident. It threw me off guard for a moment, thinking Slashdot was for sale!

  100. Re: mistyped slashdot url by fishbulb- · · Score: 1

    The site assumes that slsahdot is the only way to misspell slashdot.

  101. Write your by FluffyArmada · · Score: 0

    I wrote my congressman about this. If they get enough complains something might be done. :) And besides if it doesn't you still get an envolope that was sent with the Franking Privledge.

    --
    If con is the opposite of pro. Then isn't congress the opposite of progress?
  102. fluff.net by FluffyArmada · · Score: 0

    I tried to register http://www.fluff.net because I'm sick of http://fluffnet.serveftp.com because it takes to fricken long to type and users wouldn't remember it if they had to. :| But it turns out someone already took it. :| They are charging like $4000 dollars for it too so im not gonna be able to get it unless the company gets shut down or I win the lottery. :|

    --
    If con is the opposite of pro. Then isn't congress the opposite of progress?
  103. Re:Software Makes Wrongs Assumption About Users by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    This is more like expecting that a deiver knows what the bakes do. Really, there is no need for the user to know how DNS and seach engines works, just to know that a URL is different from a search string.
    Of corse, there are users that don't understand that, so a little training is needed, like the training needed to someone to drive, cook or use a TV remote control. There is no way to do software that can be used by everyone with no training at all.

  104. Re: mistyped slashdot url by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Well, someone has just to warn then that they have been slashdoted...

  105. Re: mistyped slashdot url by Duck1123 · · Score: 1

    Great! Now we're going to slashdot slsahdot.

  106. Apple or Phone Sex? by Hooptie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1-800-SOS-APPL

    Make sure you dial Ess-Oh-Ess NOT Ess-Zero-Ess. One is (or rather was) Apple's help line, the other was a phone sex line. Back in the bad old days I worked at Best Buy and routinely had to deal with customers complaining that we had told them to call a phone sex number.

    Hooptie

    --
    "Heavens, it appears that my weewee has been stricken with rigor mortis!" -- Stewie Griffin
  107. but how would my sig work if not for by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    typos????

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  108. Misread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    enrich the likes of porn purveyors, ISP's, Paxfire, Microsoft and VeriSign.

    Was I the only one who looked at that and thought, "Since when did Microsoft become a porn purveyor?"

    1. Re:Misread by stormi · · Score: 0

      i just like that they're on the same level

      --
      "if only i had known i would have been a locksmith." -albert einstein
  109. It's done already by al912912 · · Score: 1

    Isn't our regular internet anonymous enough?

    The only piece of information that someone has is your IP address, and it's there for routing purposes and, even though you could find out from where is thata dude connecting that's all you can know. Anyway, IP packets are still part of your undergroud internet, so there's no extra anonymity there.

    Besides that, you can have a truly anonymous internet if you don't permit any cookie, and don't have any user account. the anonymity will also be lost in your internet if you add a certain type of registration.

    So, what are you promoting here? Because I have seen this post on other slashdot sites. Is this just a downgraded internet?

    1. Re:It's done already by PIBM · · Score: 1

      No, it's not just a downgraded internet. If you've read the content you should have noted that they are using VPN, standing for Virtual Private Networking.

      What they are doing is creating an encrypted web. When you connect to the server, it is SUPPOSED not to be login what you are doing, and just redirect your packets as a normal one, except that you reach that node with an encrypted packet: you can't be sniffed and it's not possible to know what you are doing with it externally. Internally, this is a completely different thing though, and that's where it require a bit of trust in the server you use.

      As long as the server is really not logging anything, no one inside that web can know who you are outside of it. There is one thing slowing it, that's the harsh penalty of the bandwidth usage. Let's say you and your friend are both using this,and leave close next to each other. You usually were sending your homeworks by email, but once it was stolen and you've been reprimanded for that, so you decide to use that secure channel to send it over.

      You meet your friend in an irc chat room, exchange some private information to make sure it's indeed your friend, and process to send that 40MB powerpoint file. Usually, since you have 100KBps upstream, it takes like 6-7 minutes. But now, that data is encrypted and sent to your server. It then span half of that small web, passing through many ADSL / cable / potl modem and is then sent through your friend server up to him, at 1.4KBps (Speed being of the slowest part)

      It's great that no one out of that net can know what you are sending, to who you are sending it or what it is but those inside node need to be trusted and speed isn't exactly high..

      Even there, if all the nodes were connected to "logged" routers, it could probably be possible to make a correlation between the packets and find who is the source, and who is the destination, but it would not help in recovering the data.

      All in all, it's a nice idea, but far from perfect.

  110. Re:LAN by owlstead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, but that are all point to point connections. I have got that set up already with my friends. Problem is that you won't get any routing, and you must trust each friend. It's a pain on your firewall and sockets setup as well.

    What I need - and I think more people are interested in this - is something that established a virtual LAN. Now, VLAN is already another technology, so we might need another acronym. I would consider Open Virtual Private Lan, or OpenVPL for short (see below).

    The biggest issues are probably the routing - e.g. broadcast packages - and management. You would also want to set it up as a LAN adapter as well (which requires insight in device driver development). You would probably want to start off with something like OpenVPN and add routing and management on top of it.

    As you can see, I did a little thinking beforehand. Currently my private developments are all in Java unfortunately, so programming the TCP/IP stack in Linux is a bit too remote for me. This IS an interesting idea though, most of you will probably agree.

  111. typos? by Christoff+Ka+Sin+Chu · · Score: 1

    "the likes of porn purveyors, ISP's, Paxfire, Microsoft and VeriSign." So, we were talking about typos? ISPs

    --
    CKSCIII
  112. Anatomy of an "typo milionaire" by e.colli · · Score: 1

    Last week I mistyped an domain who send me to an wierd site, then I look at brazilian registrar registro.br and found this guy:

    http://registro.br/cgi-bin/nicbr/whois?qr=006.209. 119/0001-55
    http://registro.br/cgi-bin/nicbr/whois?qr=002.799. 952/0001-42

    Mostly are to catch mistyped domains, some of her domains are typed like google is spelled in portuguese.
    GLOGUE.COM.BR
    GLOOGUE.COM.BR
    GOGOGL E.COM.BR
    GOOCLE.COM.BR
    GUGOL.COM.BR

  113. Could have sworn by smchris · · Score: 1

    You mean the whitehouse isn't really a man-on-man porn site catering to the military trade?

  114. Hey, it works for me! heheh by DedHerring · · Score: 1

    It's part of the reason my blog about Hawaii politics is hosted at my domain poinography!

    --
    Clever .sig Remove SPAM characters for email.
  115. Mistype /. by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    Apparently, 4020 of us have mistyped /. today, though I went there on purpose today after accidentally going there a couple days ago.

  116. Re:LAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats exactly what metanet is

  117. Re:LAN by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

    How about an Open Virtual Anonymous LAN. You could you call it OVAL. Eh?!

    --
    Nice Marmot
  118. Flim Springfield by DarrylM · · Score: 1

    "All right, this place must be hot. They don't need a big ad, or even correct spelling."

    Ok... so it's not quite a URL...

  119. One example... by teidou · · Score: 1

    Reading my usual comics, I accidentally went to http://www.dilber.com one day, (warning: ad for an "Amateurs" site...).

    Careful what you type at work!

  120. Is typosquatting illegal? Immoral? by defile · · Score: 1

    "Oops! You probably meant to type this domain instead, here's a link. BTW, here are some ads."

    Who could get mad about that?

  121. Re:Is typosquatting illegal? Immoral? by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


    >> "Oops! You probably meant to type this domain instead, here's a link. BTW, here are some ads." Who could get mad about that?

    That sounds like 'Clippit'

    "You look like you're surfing for Donkey Porn. Would you like some help?"

  122. TOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://tor.eff.org/index.html
    Tor is a toolset for a wide range of organizations and people that want to improve their safety and security on the Internet. Using Tor can help you anonymize web browsing and publishing, instant messaging, IRC, SSH, and more. Tor also provides a platform on which software developers can build new applications with built-in anonymity, safety, and privacy features.

    And Freenet.. which I was never able to make any practical use from.

  123. Re:LAN by siriuskase · · Score: 1

    The trick is having a trusted relationship with anonymous strangers. If all you know is what you see in his posts, how do you know he is trustworthy?

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  124. You just proved the point by fingerfucker · · Score: 1


    There have always been internets. An internet is simply several LANs connected via IP routers. Somewhere along the line one big huge internet formed that we refer to as the Internet (notice the capitalization). Today other internets are usually referred to as "intranets".

    They are called "intranets", not "internets". It's only you who called them "internets".

    Internet was always used to refer to a global system of computers interconnected via TCP/IP. That's why it was always capitalized. As people started using it in a common language, it was converted from "Internet" to "internet".

    If you have an Internet-like network which is not part of the global Internet, then you've got yourself an "intranet".

    There were NEVER mulitple "Internets".

    1. Re:You just proved the point by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Get your facts straight. You might want to start by reading the first chapter of this book, for instance.

    2. Re:You just proved the point by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      It's quite pathetic that you cite Wikipedia as "facts" and a book on TCP/IP protocols, both of which have nothing to do with the actual etymology and semantics of the word "Internet" and its transformation into the non-capitalized version "internet".

    3. Re:You just proved the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're quite an idiot, aren't you?

      Have a nice day!

    4. Re:You just proved the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Professional Troll (fingerfucker),

      if Wikipedia isn't good enough, how about a dictionary:

      http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=interne t

      The most succinct definition (and proof of your stupidity) is:

      "internet

      (Note: not capitalised) Any set of networks
      interconnected with routers. The Internet is the biggest
      example of an internet."

      Sorry that you're wrong, but at least you found a good way to squeeze in the word "etymology" and give the fleeting appearance of intelligence.

    5. Re:You just proved the point by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

      The sources on dictionary.reference.com which present that "internet" is actually a word are:

      - WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003)
      - The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing
      - Jargon File 4.2.0

      The ones which do not are:

      - American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language

      In addition, in support of the capitalized version are:
      - Merriam Webster Dictionary (also online at www.m-w.com)
      - Encyclopaedia Britannica (online at www.encyclopediabritannica.com)
      - Oxford English Dictionary (accessible also via http://www.askoxford.com/?view=uk)


      If you don't see the obvious implications of what these two lists consist of, then you are the idiot here, not me.

  125. 1-800-Operater by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a friend who used to work for MCI at that time and she told me that MCI made a lot of money off that "1-800-Operater" number and didn't spend a penny to advertise it. AT&T eventually changed the number to something like 1-800-CallATT figuring that would be harder to misspell.