Slashdot Mirror


Motorola Announces E1060 Phone With iTunes Support

amichalo writes "Topping today's earlier news that Nokia and MS are collaborating on digital music in a cell phone, Motorola announced the E1060, a cell phone available Q4 2005 that supports MPEG-4/WMV/WMA/MP3 formats. Interestingly, Motorola is not locking themselves into Apple's iTunes, but also support Real Player. Reuters has more."

268 comments

  1. 404 File Not found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First 404 File Not Found Post

    The requested URL (apple/05/02/14/2218206.shtml?tid=100&tid=215&tid= 181&tid=141&tid=3) was not found.

    If you feel like it, mail the url, and where ya came from to pater@slashdot.org.

  2. Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Will it run Opera?

  3. Wow... by NivenHuH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me or has motorola really made a come back with their industrial design? This unit looks great!

    Some initial questions:
    - Is there any word on what the iTunes interface looks like?
    - Do we know what kind of removable memory it has? (What is TransFlash??)
    - Will it DRM the music files so you can't transfer them back over bluetooth (is it a one-way sync?)
    - Is the Bluetooth 2.0?

    --
    Just when you make it idiotproof, some idiot builds a better idiot.
    1. Re:Wow... by johkir · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can read all about trans-flash here. And that's all I can help you with.

      --
      These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Wow... by Kplusplus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We must be looking at different phones. The RAZR is great for it's featureset and form factor, but this thing is the same old lump of a phone that everything else comes in.

      I would really like to know how this is a RAZR succesor.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    3. Re:Wow... by computerme · · Score: 1

      It's just you. This thing if uglier then my pet monkey's butt. IMO...

      Well, at least now we know that apple's ID dept had NOTHING to do with this...

    4. Re:Wow... by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 4, Informative

      - Do we know what kind of removable memory it has? (What is TransFlash??)

      TransFlash is a removable flash memory format designed by SanDisk specifically for Motorola at their request. It's used in about 3-5 Motorola phones now, I think, and absolutely nowhere else. It's thin enough and small enough that you could lose it and not even realize it's gone for weeks until you need it. It's about the size as my pinky fingernail, and almost as thin. It has absolutely no redeeming qualities aside from being so insanely small that Motorola can stick a slot into their phones and say they support removable media without actually allocating serious space for it. It's FAR less useful than SD or CF, the only worthwhile removable flash media format (IMHO).

      Now, in their defense, Motorola assumes that most people will put one card in their phone and leave it forever, except maybe once or twice when they replace it with a bigger one and then leave that one in forever, like a hard drive. That's probably a valid assumption, but still having a proprietary format has all the associated problems with being proprietary (no competition so high prices, can't swap between devices, etc. etc. etc.)

      --

      --GrouchoMarx
      Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    5. Re:Wow... by edalytical · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's just you.

      --
      Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    6. Re:Wow... by sagekoala06 · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://news.morningstar.com/news/BW/M10/D25/200410 25005359.html "TransFlash continues to generate interest among other mobile phone makers as well, said Sabio. SanDisk expects approximately 40 handset models from several manufacturers to include TransFlash support in 2005." The link above also has some details such as the exact size ... but yeah, pinky nail size is a pretty good size comparison. I don't know if the parent has ever actually used a device with Transflash regularly but they really aren't that difficult to handle and really aren't a proprietary format. As far as I know all retail transflash cards come with a SD adapter, and I do happen to know for sure that the card is the exact same as a SD card except that the pins are in a slightly different order and it's a different package. (I made an adapter to allow my v710 to read from a 1gig transflash simply by soldering a SD card to the pins of a hollow TF body) The parent however is correct that I hardly take mine out. I do so maybe only once every few weeks to throw an episode of sealab and some fresh mp3s on there. Its not one of those things you carry around with you (although it does have a nice little carrier that holds a TF card and the SD adapter (you can even carry around a second TF in the adapter). How many people here would pay a one time fee of $25 to give their phone the ability to get free ring tones, watch full length movies and episodes of your favourite shows, mp3s, freely move pictures from a pc. (or $45 for 256mb) What it comes down to is the functionality it adds to devices is more than worth what it costs (around $10 more than a same size SD from sandisk) AND, offers all the same features of a SD card ... plus making your phone kick ass I mean come on.

    7. Re:Wow... by TG1 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's definitely ugly. Apart from the RAZR, it's a typical ugly motorola phone. I've had a few Motorola phones in the past. Never again.

      The software is ugly, the hardware is ugly. They're just.. ugly.

      I'd buy a RAZR if the software wasn't ugly.

      I wouldn't have a Nokia phone either, only because everyone in the world has one, but that said Nokia rules the roost for user interface design on mobile phones.

      But it's definitely just you, it seems.

    8. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you obviously are either a.) a programmer or b.) a bsd user because that thing is uglier than a mid nineties geocity web site.

      -bradly

    9. Re:Wow... by mikeage · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a motorola with TF -- it came with a TF->SD adaptor. Given that I have that, and it emulates a standard SD drive, why is it less useful than SD? (Seeing as how it takes virtually no space on the phone for the connector, something that CF, and even SD can't claim).

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    10. Re:Wow... by nadadogg · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you consider that thing ugly, your monkey must have a positively fantastic ass. I like the design, it makes me tingly on my boy parts.

      --
      i use linux and windows oh god how can i have an opinion
    11. Re:Wow... by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 1

      Sure it's not pretty - it's like some kind of larval stage Xbox - but uglier than a mid nineties geocities website? That's just harsh.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    12. Re:Wow... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      Except that SD Micro is already out and already a standard. There was no reason except lockin to ever create Transflash.

      It is equivilent to xD and sony memory stick. It's only reason for existance was to lock in users. Period.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    13. Re:Wow... by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Yes, but since transflash is compatible with SD, what's the problem?

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    14. Re:Wow... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      Excuse me?

      xD, Sony, SD, CF, tranflash, mini SD, MMC, SmartCard, etc are ALL compatible with USB... so what is your point?

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    15. Re:Wow... by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I need a reader for those. Furthermore, not all devices support USB. As long as a device supports SD, it supports TF -- get a TF->SD adaptor (they're free with your TF card generally), and just think of it as SD, if you like...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    16. Re:Wow... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      " Yes, but I need a reader for those"

      And you need a reader for the transflash: a SD card adapter.

      Your point doesn't make legitimate sence against my argument. It is still yet another "standard" card type that was created solely to lock users into that type. There is already a standard for ultra slim cards which are SD compatible: it is called miniSD. And they work in SD adapters just like transflash does. And they are ALREADY all over the place. There was no reason to create transflash. All it is is miniSD (something that already exists) in a different shape. All it is is bad for consumers. The more popular this card type gets the worse it is for everyone. It is a 'benefit' for transflash users at the expense of ALL flash memory customers. But it really isn't a benefit because miniSD ALREADY EXISTS. In other words, as a whole, transflash is a negative in the market and can only serve to one end: bad for the market.

      I can harp all day about the same things with sony memory stick and xD picture cards. They have no purpose except one thing: vendor lockin. transflash is on the slow boat to the same end.

      You also forget that this is bad for people who buy transflash cards. because MOST retailers will have never heard of it, and will not care to carry it in stock. For those that buy online, fine. For those that don't, drive around until you can find it at a dramaticly jacked up price.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    17. Re:Wow... by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Fair enough -- I didn't know about miniSD

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
    18. Re:Wow... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      How many people here would pay a one time fee of $25 to give their phone the ability to get free ring tones, watch full length movies and episodes of your favourite shows, mp3s, freely move pictures from a pc.

      Clearly you have never been to Asia. Bells and whistles seem to be clear selling points here. This is my impression from Bangkok, at least, and I also hear the same is true in Japan.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  4. Why? by Quasar1999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I must be a dying breed... I want my phone to make calls with, I want my iPod to listen to music too, and now you guys are blurring the lines again... Stop it... I can see it now... in a year, I'll have an iPod that does PDA stuff, plays music, is a cell phone, has a 10 megapixel camera in it, and opens my garage door.

    Why can't I have a phone that just works as a phone... and an Mp3 player that just plays music, nothing else? I thought apple was going in the right direction with the shuffle... it's small, and does just one thing... play music... is that too much to ask of phones?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Why? by path_man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mod parent up!! -- this might be "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." but the main thing we nerds want is STUFF THAT WORKS.

      The best example of the converged device that STILL isn't worth a damn is the all-in-one printer which faxes, scans, copies, and prints... not a one of those does it do well. Oh, and by the way, with phones you have the added problem of low price, battery life, portability, and god forbid, if I lose the damn thing I don't want the be SOL because all the stuff I use (mp3 players, PDA, phone, etc.) is missing.

      As usual, the manufacturers have created a solution without a problem. I have yet to hear somone at the gym say "Boy, I'd sure like my music player ring and have all my calendar/contact information as well". These things are a solution looking for a problem

      --
      The surest sign of intelligent life in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. -- Calvin & Hobbes
    2. Re:Why? by Biff+Stu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Less stuff to schlep around. If one gadget can function as an i-Pod, cell phone, PDA, and digital camera, that's less to carry.

      Of course, to be truly useful, it must do all the functions well. I personally don't see the point of the camera-phone combo, but that's mainly because they aren't especially good cameras, and I don't need a camera with me all the time anyhow.

    3. Re:Why? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True, but carrying a ton of garbage in your pockets can be VERY annoying... and that's what industrial designers are trying to solve. My pants are full of ridiculous garbage. My Costanza sized wallet, my keys, my phone, my iPod, headphones, my pen drive, a ton of change, and, as I recall, some testicles buried some place in there.

      I think a media player / camera / phone isn't a bad idea... if it were done properly. And no one has really done it properly... yet.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    4. Re:Why? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I bought a Motorola v180 for $80 cash -- you can get it for free or less (really!) with a contract. It's a phone. It's small, lightweight, durable to the point where you don't panic if you drop it, and it has a readable color screen.

      It even has a USB port if you want to hack it. It does not, however, have a substantial PDA (basic phone book and datebook), have a camera, play MP3s (as far as I could tell), or do any other fancy stuff.

      Nobody's forcing you to buy a camera phone. And if the v180 is too ritzy for you, T-Mobile offers a Nokia 6010 for even less money.

      You can get a phone with no features if you really want. Quit this "I just want a phone that makes phone calls" bitching.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My pants are full of ridiculous garbage.
      Too much information, pal.
    6. Re:Why? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's how I feel. Especially since I buy devices specifically for certain tasks.

      My main gripe is that these features that are added to these devices are done half-assed, so to speak. Sure, the Palm series of handhelds (and the various pocketPCs) do the PDA thing damn-good, but when you wanna watch video/listen to music, they don't really have the storage for them... and when you wanna play games, they don't really have the hand-control.

      That's why I bought an iPod, so I have the storage for my music.

      That's why I bought my DS and my PSP, so I have something taylored towards games.

      That's why I bought a digital camera, so I have something to take pictures with that's got decent quality.

      It'll be a different story when my Cell phone has a 40GB harddrive in it and is still this tiny little thing, then sure, maybe I'll leave my iPod at home. Or when my iPod has a full-front, high res, bright, color touch-screen with a stylus that can play decent quality video and is a full-featured PDA, then I'll have that device.

      When they add features to devices just for the sake of adding features, it gets wasted on the people who have a pocket full of devices.

      I'd pay 600$ for the iPod I spoke of earlier. Hell, if they put that nice aluminum oxide coating on the screen to prevent scratches, that'd be even better, and if they decide to make it a cell phone, too, I could finally get rid of my Nokia 8265 (it's like 4 years old).

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    7. Re:Why? by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every time we talk about cell phones, the highest modded post is a version of the one I'm replying to. Don't want new features? Fine, stick with your old phone. Or, buy a used one. Or, buy a new one that doesn't have all the bells and whistles (yes you can still find simple phones in ample supply). Plus, Some of us would like to carry fewer gadgets in our pockets.

      I thought this was Slashdot, a gatehring of people excited about new technology. Why do we mod up people who want to live in the past?

    8. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am on the same boat. It always beat me how a camera is related to a cell phone.

      What's the point of putting a half arsed camera whose lense will be full of dirt in a matter of days and that will take photos that one will be ashamed of showing to anyone, other than to show off that "we can even put a camera inside a cellphone, see..."?

    9. Re:Why? by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      Why? Because phone companies give away the phone to sell the insanely priced data services.

      And in this case, the real cost is cell towers, which odds are cannot be built near you because noone wants one in their back yard.

      So, two words: LAND LINE. Get one of the 3cents/min AT&T cards, and guess what, it works perfectly. Plus, you wont be killed on the roads as often.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll stop bitching when I can get a decent phone without the extras. You are correct I can get one, but they are all cheap pieces of crap. The phone manufacturers want you to buy the newer model, the service provider wants to sell you more service. The two entities make the simple phone a very unattractive proposition.

    11. Re:Why? by silentbozo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get yourself a surplus ammo belt. Lot of little Batman-style utility pouches for storing your gear. On the plus side, you don't have to worry about a hole in your pocket creating a situation where half of your life disappears. On the downside, the ammo-belt definitely does not go with suits. For that, you'll need a holster rig...

    12. Re:Why? by Reapman · · Score: 1

      I think there's always going to be both... i mean me personally I do not like the idea of a pda, cell, and mp3 player hanging off my belt. i have a treo that does all 3 at a level i'm happy with. but for those that want "just a phone" or "just an mp3 player" i think there will always be a market for that too.

    13. Re:Why? by generic-man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Depends on what you mean by "decent." If you want to pay big dollars to get a lot of PDA features, then you're going to get a camera. A camera costs a phone maker maybe a couple of dollars -- are you really that frugal to demand that your $400 high-end phone cost $390 so it won't have a camera in it*?

      If you really want a good organizer, buy one and carry it alongside your piece of crap phone. Phone manufacturers don't make $200 organizer-phones because carriers don't want to sell them because consumers don't want to buy them. (Really, consumers don't. Geeks aren't numerous or frugal enough to support the organizer-phone market.)

      * Sprint and other carriers sell camera-less Treos to address the "but my workplace banned camera phones problem." Alas, they charge the same amount for one without a camera as for one with a camera.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    14. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up

    15. Re:Why? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      My phone already is excellent for making calls.

      If I can get a phone that has a good 2+ megapixel camera, an mp3 player, an NES emulator and a blender, and priced decently, I'll buy it.

      Not all products are about solutions to problems. Integration isn't a problem, just a convienence. A Camera-phone isn't solving anything, but it sure is making the act of carrying not only a camera, but also a way to transmit said images, easier. A camera-music player-phone probably isn't going to revolutionize things, but it's a convience I wouldn't mind having.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    16. Re:Why? by michaelhood · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, bear in mind, the target marget for this device have never seen the inside of this "gym" you speak of.

    17. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Phones don't have a low price problem. Carriers subsidize the cost of the phone to provide a low perceived price. In actuality, EVERY customer of a carrier is helping pay for those phones; If everyone upgraded their phone every year when they're eligible, they would cost more. My Motorola V300 is like a $320 phone if you buy it from Motorola, but it's $50 from T-Mobile on new activations. It's really not a $50 device.

      Anyway, just because YOU are not the target market doesn't mean the rest of us want to carry around a bunch of separate devices to get all this stuff done. I WANT my phone to do IM, Web Browsing, calendaring, and complete contact management; I want to play MIDI ringtones, take pictures, and run Java MIDlets.

      The cellphone is a really SHITTY example of a poorly designed converged device, because there are so many examples of it being done right. Most of them are from Motorola, and cost more than/have less features than the Nokias, but are actually well built. If you buy crap, you get crap. My V300 is absolutely fantastic and does everything as well as you would expect, even if you didn't have preconceived notions that all so-called smartphones are crap. My V300 is an absolutely fantastic phone and does everything well, except take pictures, which it does better than other phones. It also has better reception than the "dumb" phone with the tiny mono screen that it replaced. It does have slightly less battery life, but as an upper primate I am able to connect it with power in the evening, or sometimes in the morning if I forget.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    18. Re:Why? by Hoch · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to hate, but I have played around with my friends' V300's, and compared to my much less converged nokia 3100, they suck. They are slow, the camera takes bad pictures, and from what i can tell the user interface is designed to be confusing. Yea, integration could be good, but when the choice is between a product that works well and a poorly designed one, I will buy the one that works well.

      --
      2*31*37*263
    19. Re:Why? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 2, Insightful
      also has better reception than the "dumb" phone with the tiny mono screen that it replaced

      And this would be the point of the discussion, from my POV.

      Where is the phone that can stand on it's own and say

      "I am a kickass phone, I get better reception that the cheap alternatives to the model containing a spare kitchen sink, my batteries last 3 months on standby or 48 hours of talk. I was designed to be a better phone, not a better way to carry eight devices in your pocket ! "

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.. the reason I choose Moto GSM phones is that they have the best RF of any cell phones I've ever used. I love my Moto for being a great *phone*.

      But it would be nice if my next Moto would work w/ iSync over Bluetooth... Dare I dream of Salling Clicker support for when I'm running a slide show using KeyNote...This is what my hopes and dreams are re: the Moto/Apple phone project. Screw iTunes on the phone, just make it work with iSync and Salling Clicker! And keep it a great *phone*. Why do i need to choose between iSync support over Bluetooth (SE phones) and great RF (Moto)? Damnit, I'm a paying customer and I demand both!

      If all we get is iTunes for *some* Moto phones, I will be disapointed. (prepared to be disapointed)

      just my $0.02

    21. Re:Why? by ezthrust · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I understand your desire for "just a phone" some of us see the value in carrying less $500 gadgets around with us. I also understand your frustration with the lack of ability to make these things do what they do well. But IF they do succeed and make a unit that plays with the ease of an iPod and makes calls as well as any of their other phones, then what harm does it do the market?

      If variety is good for the software market, as the saying goes here on /., and innovation is good, Then why is the same not good for the phone market? I see people getting really uptight when phone manufacturers try new things. Seems a little conservative to me.

    22. Re:Why? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      The user interface is configurable and you can even reorder menus and buttons. The camera is slow, but the pictures are the best I've seen from a VGA-res camera phone yet, and the screen is absolutely fantastic.

      I solved the slow camera problem by flashing my phone with a V600 software image. This also enables features like video clips, assuming I add Video to the Multimedia menu. I need to do some SEEM hacking and figure out some more features, because the V500 image I have has TTY support, too, and I want to add that to my phone.

      Every Nokia phone I've held in years has even felt like the shoddy piece of crap it is. Granted the clear housing I put on my V300 isn't quite as solid as the factory one, but it STILL feels more substantial than your average Nokia. Nokias are the hondas of cellphones; They're designed fairly intelligently, and there's tons of aftermarket stuff for them, but they're mostly meant to be cheap.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Why? by Vombatus · · Score: 1
      you wont be killed on the roads as often.

      You can get killed more than once?

      I for one welcome our zombie overlords

      --
      This sig is intentionally blank
    24. Re:Why? by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      Well, you get modded "insightful", with which I agree. now its the market's turn to mod the motorolapple and nokiasoft phonepods...how many months before we see profits saying "insightful" or losses saying "overrated"? I have exactly the same issues with the Microsoft/Nokia mediaphoney deal.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    25. Re:Why? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I know this is slightly OT, but our office has a multifunction device (page breaks in firefox. get with the program canon!) that really is great at all tasks. The scanner is only useful for documents/ocr, but it works great for that. It is a great printer and the fax and photocopier features are superior to our old copier and fax machine. Perhaps the crappy consumer grade multifuntion machines suck, but I think the scanner/copier/printer is a great solution for most small offices.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    26. Re:Why? by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      Why can't I have a phone that just works as a phone... and an Mp3 player that just plays music, nothing else? I thought apple was going in the right direction with the shuffle... it's small, and does just one thing... play music... is that too much to ask of phones?

      That's what I want as well (ok, a clock with an alarm too). I found it, as a "free" phone from Sprint; a Nokia [4 digit number].

      Guess what, Nokia lost marketshare last year for offering "monoblock" phones, according to the article. I guess you and I are the only people who want a lack of features. As far as I know, the monoblock phones have less screen area than the flip phones, so they get fewer features.

    27. Re:Why? by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1

      I'm with Quasar on this. Wanting separate devices that all work well does not make one a neophyte. It's not just phones that have this problem. If a great product comes out, buy two, because by the time your first one breaks, the latest model is going to have so many advanced features, that it is not going to be able to do what it was supposed to do in the first place. Answering machines are my favorite example of this phenomenon. The old ones that had cassette tapes in them, they were perfect. Now, the digital versions suck wind, and the old ones can't be bought for any price. I think the primary culprit is the NEW NEW NEW business cycle. A good product can NOT be left alone, it has to be improved and re-released as new every 15 minutes, and all of theses improvements" just kill.

    28. Re:Why? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Because some of us are getting tired of walking around with a lump of devices in our pockets. My new Khakis have really deep front pockets, and I wind up having more than one device per pocket (fairly easy in the hustle and bustle of college life) - it looks like I am walking around with an erection.

    29. Re:Why? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      The monthly charge is what turns me off cellphones. I 'hate' the idea of being contacted by phone when I'm away from home, and wouldn't want one for anything but emergencies. Paying a monthly fee for something I never use just seems a little too annoying for me to be able to justify, especially while I'm still in school. The huge downside to only having a landline though, is that the huge amount of cellphones out there seem to have pretty much killed payphones. On the rare chance that I've needed one, I've had a pretty hard time tracking one down.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    30. Re:Why? by univgeek · · Score: 1

      Go check out the Nokia 1100 - it does what you want. The extras are a dust-proof keypad and a LED that can be used as a flashlight.

      I don't work with Nokia, just that there are phones of the kind you want - you may have to sacrifice your precious CDMA (if you're on Verizon/Sprint). I believe ATT even gives them free with a new contract - price in India is around Rs 3K ~ $80.

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    31. Re:Why? by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      WOW, I wish my cell phone opened my garage door.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    32. Re:Why? by Avilacatia · · Score: 1

      Agreed! Must all people and things be so accessible?

    33. Re:Why? by FashionNugget · · Score: 1

      >>I think a media player / camera / phone isn't a bad idea... if it were done properly. And no one has really done it properly... yet.

      About five years ago, when Samsung released the first mp3 player phone here in the US (I believe the carrier was Sprint), it was done properly. The phone was very well thought out and actually made sense (for its time). It had a 64mb flash memory, which was quite a lot at the time (remember the first Rio mp3 player? it was 32mb. it was barely a few months before this was released).

      the reason it worked so well was because like Apple, Samsung generally seems to pay a lot of attention to ergonomics and functional form. The headset functioned as both earbud headphones and a handsfree set, and there was a little remote on the headphones that let you answer/hang up the phone as well as adjust the volume and skip songs etc.

      i think the real difference between that and current multifunction phones is that this phone claimed to have two purposes, and it did both of them well. it combined them in a way that made sense, but also made sure that each feature functioned great independently. my problem with most of the phones today is not the convergence, but the fact that it's shoddily done convergence. cameras are added just so verizon can advertize a cheap camera phone. you get lots of little features, but the package does equal the sum of its parts.

    34. Re:Why? by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Have you considered prepaid cell phones? I know tracfone doesn't have a monthly charge, and the minutes don't expire. I don't use it myself, as my use pattern's different, but it'd seem the perfect thing for you...

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    35. Re:Why? by vought · · Score: 1

      Cameras don't take bad pictures, but people do.

    36. Re:Why? by bheer · · Score: 1

      I must be a dying breed. I want my OS to provide I/O and memory management services, a program loader and a job control language. The way I see it, soon my OS will bundle window managers, networking stacks (as if it's difficult to roll my own!) and read my email for me. Why can't I have an OS that works just as an OS?

      I never cease to be surprised by how many Slashdotters are luddites when it comes to technology. Ever noticed that making calls on phones is, pretty much, a solved problem? Ever noticed that it's easier to cram more silicon and memory in a small space these days? Ever noticed that real people hate lugging an mp3 player, a digital camera *and* a mobile around and then having to charge all three (and if they had to pick _one_, they'd carry the mobile?

      And given that the market has been _very_ efficient about punishing phones that have been too big or that have had poor calling interfaces, I wouldn't worry about added features making the phone feature difficult to use. And in the meantime you always have "basic" phones like the Nokia 1100.

    37. Re:Why? by Val314 · · Score: 1

      well, i got one of those "Smart"phones some time ago... the idea of this is neat, but the software sucks so badly.

      sometimes the phone just crashes if someone calls me. (that should *not* happen)
      At least once someone called and i didnt see anything on the display about an incomming call - and yes, the signal was good enough to receive a call (again this should *not* happen).

      My Phone (Motorola A925) has all of those new and great features (GPS, PDA, Bluetooth), but none of those work fine.
      I'd love to have a *good* all-in-one device, but it seems that i'll have to wait some years to get one thats actually usable.

      >I thought this was Slashdot, a gatehring of people excited about new technology.

      Only if its done well. there is no need for a crashing mobile Phone.

    38. Re:Why? by Hast · · Score: 1

      Why can't you find such a phone? Because they don't sell. In order to drive the mobile phone market you need to sell a lot of phones. And while there are a lot of people that "just want a phone" they are the same people that don't want to spend a lot of money on a new phone every year.

      As such they may be a large potential market; but since you can't depend on them to actually buy a phone there's not much of a drive to develop a new model for them.

    39. Re:Why? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      Why do we mod up people who want to live in the past?

      That's hilarious coming from someone with "Los Angeles style rock 'n' roll" in their sig.... ;^)

    40. Re:Why? by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Amen brother!

      I feel exactly the same way. When I want a phone, I want a phone. I don't want to play crappy Java games. I don't want to remote control my TV with it. I don't want to use it as a camera because the picture quality is crap. I don't want a buggy vulnerable OS on it.

      I just want to send and receive phonecalls and SMS.

      But no. Apparantly "we" all want total product integration. So when my phone breaks, I can't play music, play games, take photos or open my beer either.

      Great.

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    41. Re:Why? by Mant · · Score: 1

      Then buy a different phone. Honesty, nothing stops you getting a cheap phone which doesn't play MP3. OK even basic phones probably have a couple of games on them or something these days, but you can just not play them.

      I have a basic mobile phone, and a separate MP3 player, and I'm happy. Clearly though there is a market for integrated devices as well. Nothing wrong with people having choice.

    42. Re:Why? by Milton+Waddams · · Score: 1

      Don't buy one then. When I get a phone, I buy the bottom of the range one that makes phone calls, sends SMSs and has an alarm clock on it. That's all I need. Plus the battery life on it is amazing compared to current phones.

      Free market dude. Buy what you want to buy and don't buy what you don't want to buy.

    43. Re:Why? by KaptajnKold · · Score: 1

      You are a crying breed. You want a phone to make calls with. Well maybe i didn't RTFA, but I'm pretty sure that you can do that with this phone too. And it will be a long time (=never) before you can't listen to music on an iPod. You are part of race that always seem to believe that technology peaked some few years past and everything since has been a degradation. I can almost imagine you poo-pooing SMS when it first appeared: "It's a phone dammit! Why does it need to send and receive text messages?". And before that you propably complained about the decision to put a display on the same phones: "It's for talking in. Why would I want a display that just consumes precious battery life?"
      I for one am happy to see the effort that is put into integrating all thes gadgets. Everytime they succeed it is one less gadget for me to carry around. I would like them to integrate the keys to my front door with my wallet, my phone, my calender and my portable music player. Then I will just need one pocket. Sure, some of these devices are quite frankensteinian (is that a word I wonder) and useless. But that's how progress works: Trial and error.
      I don't understand why you have got anything against these devices. If you are happy with the ones you have got it's not like you are forced to upgrade. The ones you have will not wear out faster, and when they eventually do you still have the choice to buy any one of about a gazillion phones, used or new. And just maybe someone will ion the mean time have stumpled upon the one killer feature that redeems all the failed avenues.
      Finally I find it amusing that you talk about the iPod as if was some indispencable class of product that you had gotten familiar with from a lifetime of use. It's a product that's less than 5 years old! And I wouldn't be surprised if I discovered that you were one of the intial nay-sayers: "Why would anyone need 5 GB of music in their pocket? You can get essentially the same fuctionality from 20$ analogous walkman".

    44. Re:Why? by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      Precisely. My Siemens SX1 is the closest so far - it only falls short on lens quality. Shame it can't work as a pen drive, although I don't have a major need for that. It plays back XVid, RM, 3GPP video clips, MP3, Ogg audio, even makes phone calls with decent call clarity.

    45. Re:Why? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The best example of the converged device that STILL isn't worth a damn is the all-in-one printer which faxes, scans, copies, and prints... not a one of those does it do well.

      Well.. I'm not sure what machines you're using. We have a Xerox DC220 here and it works really good for all functions. This machine is not color. A good color multifunction machine is going to be quite expensive, so you may have been priced out of a quality machine and maybe this influenced your thinking on this matter.

      An office multi-function machine makes sense. Copying is Scanning+Printing. Faxing is Scanning+Phone, etc. A multi-function phone is different. Playing MP3s isn't at all related to making a phone call, which isn't related to a calendar, which isn't related to games, etc.

    46. Re:Why? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I thought this was Slashdot, a gatehring of people excited about new technology. Why do we mod up people who want to live in the past?

      More like "a gathering of people excited about new, good, technology." These franken-phones, based on reports here, don't work very well at any of their tasks, which is why there is a backlash against them.

    47. Re:Why? by xezas · · Score: 1
      No one's stoppin you from getting a phone which is just a phone. As a matter of fact, mobile companies out there are building low-cost, simple phones as is evident in this article and this piece.

      In the meantime, leave the SmartPhones to the rest of us who crave such an amalgamation of devices.

    48. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered why the Japanese had this stuff 5 years ago but in America it doesn't exist. And well, this must be reflective of most American's attitudes about electronics. They just don't sell in America.

    49. Re:Why? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      " Why can't I have a phone that just works as a phone... and an Mp3 player that just plays music, nothing else?

      because the rest of use are tired of carrying around a mp3 player, phone, pda, camera, portable game system, video player, keys, wallet... get the idea?

      Wouldn't it be great to carry something the size of your wallet that did everything? If it could only get a week's worth of battery life too it'd be perfect, but they're improving on that, modern phones with bright color screens and cameras are getting better battery life then the b/w models of just a few years ago with weaker batteries too.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    50. Re:Why? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      I don't know. That thing has some major interface design problems (weird keypad and joystick) and not enough memory.

      Just my 2

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    51. Re:Why? by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      Major interface problems? Joystick is pretty normal, keypad has taken next to no time to get used to. As for memory, come on, it can take up to 1gig MMC cards, and they are hot swappable.

  5. Obviously not Apple designed by Kplusplus · · Score: 1, Troll

    It's just about the ugliest phone I've ever seen.

    Plus it's not shiny white plastic or a grey metal shell.

    --
    -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
    1. Re:Obviously not Apple designed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system" That makes you a special kind of idiot.

    2. Re:Obviously not Apple designed by Kplusplus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Lol, I don't see how this is a troll, It's true. This phone is super ugly, especially coming from the same company that made the RAZR. I mean come on, let's be honest, that phone looks awful.

      --
      -"I'm one of those Mac people that will break a bottle on the bar and hold it to your throat for bad-mouthing my system"
  6. iPod killer? Unlikely. by ntxb229 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not quite sure how this would be an ipod killer. It only has 32mb of internal memory and supports up to 512mb of additional memory. I can't really see cellphone/mp3 player combo devices really taking off until they start to have storage capabilities similar to an ipod mini.

    That being said, I'm not sure I see downloadable music on your cellphone EVER taking off because once you've got tons of storage (and tons of your music) why would you spend the time (or money) downloading more through your phone. Where I think a device like this could become popular is if service providers offered streaming radio. This seems much more possible now with 3g networks taking off.

    1. Re:iPod killer? Unlikely. by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      At 512MB it would compete with the $99 iPod shuffle except you'd have to buy your own 512MB flash card for an unknown price (website says TransFlash, sounds proprietary). If this phone is compatible with the iTunes music store it would have to sync with iTunes on a PC or Mac just like an iPod shuffle. This is a do-it-all combo device to save you from carrying 4 or 5 separate gadgets. There's a flash MP3 player, a 1.3M pixel digital camera (nothing special but better than most camera phones), a VGA camera for videoconferencing (not one! two cameras!), a streaming audio/video player, and probably enough calendar and phonebook features to save you from carrying a PDA.

    2. Re:iPod killer? Unlikely. by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I had an idea. What if you could combine the cell phone with something like the iPod for a sort of mobile internet radio? Perhaps the option to save the stream on your media player while listening to it? That's something I've always loved - the ability to be able to download a stream off of the internet on to my computer. Hey, I'm just thinking of listening to Di.FM on the go, with TiVo style support.

    3. Re:iPod killer? Unlikely. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So long as the [inevitable] DRM allows you to copy the files to your PC once you get home, and/or you can get the file sent to your collection at home as well, and I had enough bandwidth to rapidly download songs to my converged phone/music player, I would certainly buy songs while I was on the go. You want to listen to music when you want to listen to it, not just later. It would fulfill the desire for instant gratification. I could actually do all this stuff on my phone now, as it supports mp3 music files and JAVA/MIDP (with filesystem access supposedly, though I cannot find any documentation - you have to sign your applets to get privileges like that) but I would have to download at GPRS speeds, and my phone only has about 5.1MB of free storage after the basic files that are always on the mobile. I could remove some of them (like lame ringtones) and get another half meg maybe... Barely enough for one song at decent quality.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  7. cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but can i install Debian + X + GNOME on it then do a suitcase mod and carry that around with me ?

    1. Re:cool... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      No, but you can install BSD on it, because this device is surely dead. No, really, it doesn't look like it'll take off.

  8. No RAZR iTunes? by ablair · · Score: 1

    Too bad Moto isn't including iTunes support in their awesome (though expensive) RAZR phone or at least across most of their high-end mobiles. Moto also states that they will be compatible with non-iTMS offerings such as Real as well, so it's not an exclusive.

    1. Re:No RAZR iTunes? by thejoelpatrol · · Score: 1
      They have previously said that they will start offering the feature in more of their phones. This is just the first. When I first heard about this some months ago, I understood that the plan was to include it in all Moto phones, at least all that were of a certain spec level. Can't find a link to that, but here's a link to the a shot of the interface, which people have been asking for (yes, that is a different phone in the picture...it's just a demo unit)

      Pictures of iPod-like interface

    2. Re:No RAZR iTunes? by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      The Razr V3 is much like a supermodel: from afar it is exquisite, but up close, it's annoying, hard to deal with, and hard to justify.

      See, the Razr is gorgeous (though it's slightly odd proportions take some getting used to). The keypad actually works. And it's almost stunning to whip one of those things out and watch people ooo and ahhh.

      On the other hand, the UI is godawful slow, the address book is confounding ("add digits"?), the screen doesn't make very good use of its size, voice command is a joke, and it STILL won't vibrate and ring at the same time.

      But this is a response to a question about iTunes on the Razr, and I can answer it thus: the current Razr has 6MB of memory, without an expansion slot. The new black Razr announced today has the same. Only the new candybar V8 (healthy too!) Razr has a transflash slot. So, 6MB. You could fit one song in that space, and then you'd have no room left over for MP3 ringtones, photos from the camera, or your address book.

      I'm not knocking your post, since I too would love to see iTunes on the Razr, but first I'd like to see a Razr that can handle iTunes.

    3. Re:No RAZR iTunes? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I agree, that RAZR phone is damn pretty. I've been lugging around a nokia (one of the last non-color, non-flip ones they made- no polyphonic ringtones, even). I hadn't bothered to get a new phone, even though this one looks like it's been to iraq, since I wasn't happy with ANY of the offerings from any company.

      Even the Danger Sidekick wasn't really what I was looking for. I thought the sidekick2 would be worth it, but after playing with one, it really feels just like the first. i have no idea what the difference is except for the USB an the stupid camera and redesigned case...

      I just wish the RAZR had a slightly bigger screen.

      It reminds me of the Titanium Powerbook, but in Cell-form.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    4. Re:No RAZR iTunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it STILL won't vibrate and ring at the same time. Weird. My RAZR does that fine. I go to ring styles and turn on "Vibrate & Ring" and it does exactly that... Maybe your one is malfunctioning? I've also got "Vibrate THEN Ring", "Vibrate", "Silent" (no vibrate, no ring), "Loud" and "Soft"...

    5. Re:No RAZR iTunes? by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

      Oh, my bad. I guess they fixed that. Now why can't the V600 be flashed to do that?

  9. iTunes? by Geekenstein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so maybe it supports AAC, but the songs that come from the iTunes Music Store have DRM protection in them, and Windows Media Player definitely won't support that format. So sure, you can copy your own songs encoded by iTunes into AAC, but why use AAC if it isn't DRM'd?

    1. Re:iTunes? by outZider · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, no. Nokia is using Windows Media Player. Motorola is using iTunes software, so it supports DRM'd AAC as well as the other formats. :)

      --
      - oZ
      // i am here.
    2. Re:iTunes? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      I believe the whole deal is that it DOES support iTunes encrypted AAC. Otherwise it would just be an mpeg4 audio file.

    3. Re:iTunes? by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ok, so maybe it supports AAC, but the songs that come from the iTunes Music Store have DRM protection in them, and Windows Media Player definitely won't support that format. So sure, you can copy your own songs encoded by iTunes into AAC, but why use AAC if it isn't DRM'd?

      Yeah, I'm not exactly clear how it supports iTMS PlayFair DRM either. The linked article mentions only MPEG4, not iTunes, so it is quite a leap to assume that this phone is the iTunes mobile phone that Apple and Motorola have been talking about.

      Not only that, did anyone else think the designers of this phone took too many cues from the Xbox? It's ugly, black and green, and I can't imagine Steve Jobs would be caught dead putting iTunes mobile on a device so hideous looking.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:iTunes? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      I wonder, though, if one of these counts as an activation for iTunes (I'm thinking you have to auth it in a manner similar to a computer, as otherwise you could just grab music from anyone's iTMS purchases and put them on there)

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    5. Re:iTunes? by neier · · Score: 1

      FairPlay is tied to the computer, not the portable devices. AFAIK, you can sync as many iPods (and soon, phones) as you want, to any one of the five(?) computers which are authorized to play your purchased iTunes tracks.

      Via the disc functionality, you can copy protected song files on/off an iPod at will; but, they will not play unless they were loaded via iTunes. I suspect it will be the same for these phones.

    6. Re:iTunes? by dtfarmer · · Score: 1

      I wonder, though, if one of these counts as an activation for iTunes

      I would assume these phones would count more like an iPod - authorizing and linking to only 1 computer at a time, but until they are released it's all just speculation.

    7. Re:iTunes? by jwin1020 · · Score: 1

      Because MPEG-4 (AAC) is less lossy than MP3.
      Because higher quality can be achieved at lower bitrates.
      Because AAC is an open format.

      Apple may be championing the format but it's worth using due to its technical superiority and non-proprietary nature.

    8. Re:iTunes? by feldsteins · · Score: 1

      Because it sounds good at low bit rates?

      --
      You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
    9. Re:iTunes? by oscast · · Score: 1

      but why use AAC if it isn't DRM'd

      AAC offers better quality at lower bit rates than other codecs.

  10. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by polyhue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think when you're trying to keep prices up and keep sales volume up, yes it might be too much to ask. I agree though, it's harder and harder to find a decent mobile phone that works well as a phone, first and foremost. Often you have to buy some super-fancy decked out version just to get a decent phone, but pay a huge premium for 45 features you don't want or need. Well, here's your market opening... get out the soldering gun.

  11. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I noticed that the Motorola phone supports MPEG 4 and WMV. Unless those are typos, now you'll be able to chat with friends OR watch movies while driving! I can't wait.

  12. Keyboard? by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No QWERTY? Won't that limit all that instant messaging and e-mailing you could do with it, and before someone tells me about the size being a consideration you should check out my phone: the Motorola A630. Small does not mean no keyboard.

    1. Re:Keyboard? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nice link, Motorola seems to have removed the images of the phone opened up. WAs it that way when you linked it, or did you even check?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Keyboard? by javaxman · · Score: 1
      No QWERTY? Won't that limit all that instant messaging and e-mailing you could do with it

      Yes, that will limit IM and emailing. In TFA, it says "the E1060 model which is aimed at music afficianados and which will feature iTunes Music Player"... meaning the market they're targeting with that phone isn't likely to be typing out text messages, instead they'll be cheerfully listening to MP3 tunes ( AAC FairPlay DRM'd or otherwise ).

      You and your text messaging friends will want the upcoming A1000 or something, with TFA also talks about...

    3. Re:Keyboard? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have gotten to the point where I can type pretty quickly with iTap. The predictive text entry makes typing with one thumb faster than typing with two thumbs and no predictive entry in many cases. If I were planning to ssh from my phone, I'd want a full keyboard. For SMSing, the normal keypad is sufficient. I have 250 SMS, and I have used more than half of them on more than one occasion.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Keyboard? by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Googled for "motorola a630" and the first results (two hits from the Image search that displayed in the 'web' search category) were relevant. Here it is open.

  13. Re:iPod Killer by hashish · · Score: 1

    How is this a iPod killer? It would compete in Handsprings/PalmOne's Treo domain.

    The really only thing new here is iTunes support, but then with the lack of real storage I would not think that this is a huge benefit over it competition.

  14. Another... by Robotron23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another day, another useless piece of gadgetry. 2005 is turning out to be another year in which the electronics industry as a whole adds to its products useless features, and expects (sensibly) consumers to lap it up and beg for seconds.

    1. Re:Another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to people like you, we don't get the truely good gadgets make it to the US, they pass us by and end up in Europe.

    2. Re:Another... by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      I wish there was some imagination in the convergences. Can we please get a watch with a phone built in, instead of always putting a clock on a phone ? Lets try getting the equipments off the belt or out of the pockets and back into some sort of style.

    3. Re:Another... by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

      /.'s ability to predict the next hot consumer toy is nothing I'd bet the farm on... ;-)

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    4. Re:Another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a freaking cell phone!!!! Of course it's wireless.

    5. Re:Another... by citog · · Score: 1

      Think about what the grandparent said.... it might dawn on you at some point what he means.

  15. 'bout time by nborders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man this took them forever. Call me a simple developer, however how hard can it be to add some more flash memory, better sound output through a headset, and modify the hardware to read MP3s. I've been pissed at the phone industry for nearly 2 years for not doing this. ~n

    1. Re:'bout time by shark72 · · Score: 3, Informative

      " Man this took them forever. Call me a simple developer, however how hard can it be to add some more flash memory, better sound output through a headset, and modify the hardware to read MP3s. I've been pissed at the phone industry for nearly 2 years for not doing this."

      It's not the first phone with those features, by far. My somewhat old Sony Ericsson K700i has ~ 40MB of memory and plays MP3s with good quality. I don't use it as an MP3 player in the traditional sense, but I use MP3 files as ringtones, much to the chagrin of the people around me. The FM radio has been surprisingly useful as well.

      It's not easy to find in the US, but it's available online. I got an unlocked model on my last trip to Asia. A trip to Asia is a great way to remind one's self of how utterly backward the US mobile phone market is.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    2. Re:'bout time by nborders · · Score: 1
      Yea, I read about that one Last year. It was hella' expensive, but tops on my list.

      Man, I still can't believe how behind we are in this country with cell phone technology. I'm afraid the same thing will happen with city-wide WiFi.

      ~n

    3. Re:'bout time by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Vodafone already offered a 1GB MP3 model two years ago in Japan, and it was reasonably priced.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  16. From the Cell-Phones-Aren't-Noisy-Enough Dept. by Mitaphane · · Score: 2, Funny

    I won't be satisfied with cell phones until mine has a boombox attached to the side of it. When that day comes I'll truly reach the pinnacle of bling-bling.

    1. Re:From the Cell-Phones-Aren't-Noisy-Enough Dept. by nuclear305 · · Score: 1

      "I won't be satisfied with cell phones until mine has a boombox attached to the side of it. When that day comes I'll truly reach the pinnacle of bling-bling."

      Sign up for our new SuperLeet package and you're Home Area is no less than the Milky Way, with 432000 minutes every month!

      Act now and we'll give you your choice of free BlingBing 340 or BoomBox 335 phones. Add an extra line to the package and you'll also receive the Nagging Wife 1.0 and Screaming Child 2.3 software packages.

    2. Re:From the Cell-Phones-Aren't-Noisy-Enough Dept. by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

      There are "boomboxes" with iPod docks on them... cellphone/boombox isn't too far off, I'm afraid.

      --
      Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
      Africus aut Europaeus?
    3. Re:From the Cell-Phones-Aren't-Noisy-Enough Dept. by mctk · · Score: 1

      I'm way ahead of you, man. Bling-bling!

      --
      Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
  17. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think when you're trying to keep prices up and keep sales volume up, yes it might be too much to ask. I agree though, it's harder and harder to find a decent mobile phone that works well as a phone, first and foremost. Often you have to buy some super-fancy decked out version just to get a decent phone, but pay a huge premium for 45 features you don't want or need. Well, here's your market opening... get out the soldering gun.

    Wait... you said a decent phone... I can't make a decent phone... if multi-billion dollar companies can't make one, how on earth could I make one? Short of buying one of theirs and frying all the 45 extra features I didn't want... hmmm... I think you're on to something... :P

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  18. Re:iPod Killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't you know a flaming troll when you see one?

  19. or, alternatively... by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Interestingly, Motorola is not locking themselves into Apple's iTunes, but also support Real Player.

    Or, alternatively, "Interestingly, Nokia has locked themselves into Microsoft's Windows Media Player and Motorola has not done so"

    ...or how about, "Interestingly, the device will support a wide number of formats"?

    Really getting tired of slanted stories.

    It's pretty big news that the Motorola device supports stuff other than WMP formats. Why? Because generally MS contracts for that sort of thing go as follows: "License WMP, get the technology really, really cheap, get lots of support from us, we'll practically write it all for you. Now, dump everything else, or the deal's off." Motorola told 'em to go screw.

    1. Re:or, alternatively... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, Nokia has not locked itself into anything. Current models support MP3/WAV/AAC/AMR on the audio front and MPEG-4/H.263 on the video front, and Real formats as well.

      The only value in this press release is the word "iTunes." Everything else has already been done by the competiton.

      --

      ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    2. Re:or, alternatively... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or, alternatively, "Interestingly, Nokia has locked themselves into Microsoft's Windows Media Player and Motorola has not done so"

      Do you spread lies because you're an Apple zealot?

      Nokia hasn't locked themselves to Microsoft:
      Played formats (decoding): .3gp and .mp4 file formats, MPEG-4 video, H.263 video and AMR audio, RealMedia (Real Video and Real Audio), MP3, and AAC
    3. Re:or, alternatively... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If you're tired of slanted stories, you should NEVER read ANY news from ANY source. They are ALL slanted, it doesn't matter if it comes from News Corp. or from Reuters, Ltd.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:or, alternatively... by Tintivilus · · Score: 1

      to mod or to comment (sigh)

      You're dead on, but missing the bigger picture. The US isn't *that* great a cellular market... now, how many European carriers do you think want to be locked into Microsoft Tax for for all the content on their networks?

    5. Re:or, alternatively... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Europe"?

      What about China...if they have to start paying Microsoft for s/w, then they'll likely dump it as quickly as Mr Hanky.

    6. Re:or, alternatively... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but Slashdot wears its bias on its sleeve like a common supermarket tabloid. I prefer to read my news from sources like Reuters and the New York Times that at least present their biases with the dignity they deserve.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  20. $oblig_comment-[25}{subject} by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why do they keep putting the features of $comment{device1} into $comment{device2}? I just want my $comment{device1} to do $comment{device1_function}. Next thing you know, my $comment[25]{simple_device} will have $comment[25]{outrageous_feature}.

  21. Getting closer... by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1
    Now add in game-playing and decent PDA functionality (PalmOS, ideally), and this is the all-in-one gadget to rule the world.

    More storage would be nice, as would more megapixels, but I'm definitely planning on getting one to replace my V60 and Palm Pilot and use as a second iPod.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  22. Killer App for Music Phones by blamanj · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The way to make money with music-enabled cell phones is this.

    1) Make sure you can sync with your computer (e.g., iTunes)
    2) Keep the airtime charge for download low (music biz to subsidize?)
    3) Work with the radio stations so that when they play a new release they can also say, "And dial *1592 with your iTunes phone to buy and download this song now"

    Instant gratification + low end user cost = profit

    1. Re:Killer App for Music Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > 3) Work with the radio stations so that when they play a new release they can also say, "And dial *1592 with your iTunes phone to buy and download this song now"

      This would be awesome. I figured they could do this on the internet too. For example, the BBC transmit their radio stations over the internet; the shows usually maintain web pages which show what is being played (and has recently been played). It would be pretty trivial for them to link to iTMS or whatever, in order to make it easy to buy it.

      I suppose that doing this on a phone would be problematic, but it could store the purchase request and have your computer execute the transation after the next iSync.

    2. Re:Killer App for Music Phones by mingrassia · · Score: 1


      3) Work with the radio stations so that when they play a new release they can also say, "And dial *1592 with your iTunes phone to buy and download this song now"


      You mean something like this?

      I have seen the demo for this on a S90 device and it is very cool. Too bad we will have to wait forever until it is available in the US :-(

      --
      OS X, Linux, Tivo, Amiga, my fascination with cult-like technologies would intrigue any psychiatrist.
  23. Both divergence and convergence make sense by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Informative
    Convergence makes sense because there is such a huge overlap between the guts of most mobile devices. All cameras, PDAs, phones, MP3 players need CPU + RAM + flash + battery. By combining these you only need one set to support all the functionality and makes for one lump of stuff in your pocket.

    Divergence makes sense because some people just want a phone that does the phone function well. I don't really care for carrying around a shitty camera. I don't use a PDA. I don't like music. I therefore bought me a Nokia 1100 phone. Dumb as a rock phone with BW screen no bluetooth etc. Small, cheap and lasts for a month on a single charge (my mileage). When I do carry a digital camera, I want pretty good photos and carry a real digital camera.

    If you look at hunting knives, you'll see a wide spectrum of just-a-blade knives to Swiss Army (does everything, but not very well). I expect that phone vendors will continue to mnake just-a-phone, but the incremental addition of a MP3 player etc is getting cheaper and adds a bunch of functionality (as well as a way to sell services), so the richer feature set will continue to grow too.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Convergence doesn't make sense to me.

      I don't want to loan my phone when I loan my camera.
      I don't want to delete my music library from my mp3 player when I need to move a large file on my portable hard drive.
      I don't want to lose my PDA when my six-year-old drops my Game Boy.
      I don't want to have to put my entire life on hold when one device is charging.

    2. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Amusingly enough, I can still use my phone while it is charging, including the camera feature. Did I miss something? There are also some addressable points here; First, the camera on the cellphone isn't meant to replace your primary camera. It's there so that you can snap quick pictures when you don't HAVE your real camera. Second, the ability to use the mp3 player as a portable hard drive is a feature, not a bug. If you just want a portable hard drive, you can just buy one; if that ever changes, you can always just not use the mp3 player in it. As for the PDA/Game Boy thing, if I had a game system that I used all the time, I wouldn't let my kid use it anyway. I'd buy them one of their own.

      In other words, you're just a crotchety old (man?) I absolutely adore the fact that my phone has a camera, and I'll be glad when getting an mp3 player with a decent amount of storage in there is as cheap as the camera feature is. It is pure gold to be able to have a camera (however crappy) everywhere I go.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      You can still use your cell phone while it's recharging if you don't mind being in your car or at your desk. I have a cell phone because it doesn't have to be tethered to the wall. I'm now on my second cell phone camera, and I have yet to take a picture that is usable, not to mention that I have to buy a proprietary cable and software to get the damn thing off my phone, if it ever takes a usable picture. Yes, you'd buy the kid one of their own, because it makes sense to have two separate items. Does that make you a crotchety old (man)? Or are you uniquely situated to determine when convergence is good and when it is not?

    4. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 1

      One problem with convergence is where you have a device that does X, Y, and Z, and you go to a place that doesn't allow one of those things. For example, there was some brouhaha in my area recently over gyms kicking people out for bringing in their cell phones that happened to have cameras built in (the gyms in question did not allow cameras). This could become a real problem if you have total convergence. Suddenly that iPod you like to use while you're at the gym is banned because you might potentially take a picture of some chick with its built-in camera function.

      --
      "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
      -- Ryan Stiles
    5. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what I've found is that while they might continue to make single use phones, they put much less effort into the design. Certainly, by now their internals are quite reliable, but you won't find any of style so present in new phones.

      I'm in the odd situation where I want a phone that is _only_ a phone but at the same time looks better than the hunk of gold plastic I got when I signed up with t-mobile. So what I ended up doing was purchasing a Nokia 8890 off of ebay. The don't make the damn thing anymore and as far as I can tell haven't for three our four years. But it's an incredibly reliable and stylish world phone for a quarter of the price of a camera phone.

      Maybe I'm just bad with economics, but I'm surprised there is not a bigger market for this. I know a lot of people who love their mobile, but can do little more than save a name and number to their address book. People will certainly continue to buy things that they don't need, but I think that a good medium between the entry level and true gadget phones would draw more people upward from the entry level than downward from the mp3/camera phones.

    6. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Instead of "converging," I wish my devices would just work together better. As an analogy, imagine a converged device is like a GUI application: it has a bunch of functions, but doesn't do them well. Instead, I want a set of devices that work like UNIX tools. Rather than dividing functions into "phone", "mp3 player", etc., I want to have a "tranceiver", "storage unit", "earphone/mic", "display", etc. Basically, I want a modular wearable computer.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Both divergence and convergence make sense by bastardsquadmuzz · · Score: 1

      I have to say, I got an 1100 on the reccomendation of someone on Slashdot and I am very impressed with it. It's got all the best bits from the past Nokias without all the excess, and is very nice to use.

      --
      --Muzz
  24. Re:iPod Killer by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    512mb storage and (possibly) up to 1gb on an SD card? I can see it competing with the iPod Shuffle.
    This phone is useful to me because I usually have a cell phone, while my iPod is mainly for my drive into work and while at work. To have a 5 hours worth of music with me at all times would really make the time I spend waiting in line, at appointments, etc, move faster. You can't always carry an iPod, even a Shuffle, but you can usually have your phone with you.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  25. Did you get that feeling too? by geomon · · Score: 1

    Am I getting younger, or do I detect the Old Man Syndrome squeezing itself into the discussion?

    Really, I have said before that I get annoyed with all the stuff they attempt to put into a phone, but one of the main reasons most folks got into connectivity technology was to communicate in innovative ways.

    I'm going to keep an open mind with this coupling. Who knows where I might find a use for this. What about Books on Tape "On Tap"? Downloadable audio books from a favorite author?

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Did you get that feeling too? by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely feeling crotchety at the moment. Why can't i just have a number of devices, each of which does 1 thing, and does it better than anything else? i mean, this moto only has the OPTION of 544 megs of memory, with only 32 built in...
      Why should I buy this phone instead of a shuffle and a RAZR?
      I suppose I would definitely want 1 ugly device rather than 2 beautifully designed devices, if nothing else...

      Step 1: build integrated ugly cellphone/ugly mp3 player
      Step 2: ?
      Step 3: PROFIT!!!!

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
  26. Where's my OGG support? by ScytheBlade1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really? I want my OGG support! Plus, sticking it in a product like this might get some more users of it, and make it just a little more used (another nail in the MP3 coffin).

    1. Re:Where's my OGG support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up pls

    2. Re:Where's my OGG support? by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      OGG is dead, get over it already. Less than 1/1000th users even know what Vorbis is, let alone want it. MASS market is the only thing that counts.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    3. Re:Where's my OGG support? by jdog1016 · · Score: 1

      Wake up. There is no MP3 coffin, and there isn't going to be any time soon. And when there is, it isn't going to be replaced by OGG. Why? Because people don't adopt new technologies that are only marginally (in this case debatable anyway) better than what they would replace. People adopt technologies because they are orders of magnitude better than what they replace.

    4. Re:Where's my OGG support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The high-end Nokia models based on the Symbian OS have an OGG player available for them. (They also play MP3 and AAC, of course)

    5. Re:Where's my OGG support? by Xyde · · Score: 1
      I was going to mod you funny until I realised you were serious. For shame.

      mmm egg nog.

    6. Re:Where's my OGG support? by diablobsb · · Score: 1

      then get a p800, p900 or even better, the p910 from Sony Ericsson...
      http://symbianoggplay.sourceforge.net/
      and
      http://symbianoggplay.sourceforge.net/screen_fo_v0 .8.jpg

      i've stuffed my p800 with 128Mb memory 3 CDs in ogg format... it also works with wireless bluetooth headsets...
      If you get a p900, i think it supports up to a 512 or 1Gb of flash...

      and if you need more space... just carry more memory cards... (there's even a trick for the p800 so you can strap a memory along with the battery (inside the phone) for carrying...
      I believe other symbian capable phones are also able to run oggplay...

      --
      I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
    7. Re:Where's my OGG support? by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 1

      As opposed to another nail in the OGG coffin?

      Come on now. What REAL advantages over AAC or MP3? Honestly curious here.

      --
      "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
    8. Re:Where's my OGG support? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Less than 1/1000th users even know what Vorbis is

      It's more like 1/100,000, if even that.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  27. Ed Zander, Motorola's new boss by joelparker · · Score: 1
    Ed Zander moves from Sun Microsystems to Motorola, and shakes things up with an emphasis on the customers-- article from the Economist here

    (requires subscription or pay per view)

  28. Are Motorola's any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had a basic Nokia phone for the last two years that's worked great as my full time phone, but recently got switched over to a Motorola v551 and my reception is horrible. In additional, the user interface is annoyingly slow. Sure, it records video and crap like that but if I can barely get through a five minute call without it dropping then what good is it? Had the same trouble with the v501.

    Is it because AT&TW/Cingular swithed me from their old digital service to GSM? Or are Nokia phones just that much better. I'm really disappointed with these Motorolas.

    1. Re:Are Motorola's any good? by Miphnik · · Score: 1

      If you were on AT&T or Cingular's old TDMA network, and are now on their GSM network, you're comparing apples and oranges. What is a well-covered, legacy TDMA area may still be a fringe GSM area as they continue to build out the system. The only way to make this a valid comparison would be if you were on the same network originally.

      --
      "My order takes pride in knowing all that can be known, and most of all the rest..." --Galen
    2. Re:Are Motorola's any good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's kinda why I was asking.

  29. Hint: by mcc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No one will buy it. No one is going to buy the Nokia/Microsoft thing either. Just like no one bought the Nokia N-Gage. People don't want this sort of thing.

    The thing to remember about "convergence" devices is they only make sense if you can perform both functions without either interfering with the other. Let's say someone sells something that is both a video game system and a DVD player. This is a good idea. There is no interference, and the parts compliment the whole nicely; a DVD player needs some kind of MPEG decoder, a video game system needs some kind of optical drive, but the two never interfere-- you will never want to use your DVD player and video game system at the same time. Now let's say someone sells something that is both a video game system and a PVR. It will not sell. True, a hard drive and certain other features are desirable in both video games and PVRs. There is massive interference, though; you very much want to use both of these products at the same time. You want to be able to sit there and play GTA all night without worrying that you're missing Family Guy, because the Tivo will just pick it up. The engineer must thus either duplicate so much hardware that there is little or no benefit to the convergence, or just dictate "you can't use the pvr and video game features at once". (Your PC, of course, can act as both a PVR and a video game system without significant interference! But there you're trading functionality for convenience, ease of use, focus and cost. Someone could try to slap together a PC that plugs into a TV and say "look! it's a pvr and video game system!"... but they'll probably be as hard to use and charge as much as if you'd just bought a small PC.)

    Now, let's think: What if someone tries to put an mp3 player in a phone? Even worse idea. The parts compliment each other poorly; you do not want or need the kind of playback quality on a phone that you need in an mp3 player, you do not want or need the kind of disk storage in a phone that you need in an mp3 player (unless you have the ability to record and save phone calls or ambient noise, which is a kickass potential feature, but unlikely due to legality). Meanwhile, there's interference. You want to be able to pause your mp3 player to answer your phone without losing your place; you want to be able to run your mp3 player all night without your phone battery being dead in the morning. The two features subtly, but distinctly, struggle for the hardware. Maybe if Apple is building the thing they can reconcile the two. If Motrorola designs it... probably not so much.

    Basically the only benefit here is that unlike with PVRs or video game systems, people have shown themselves ready and willing in large quantities to pay too much for mp3 players and phones. OK... wait, actually that's a pretty good benefit, since people have demonstrated they're willing to pay more for a "luxury" product with the iPod name, and if this is a high-margin product it will make decent profit even if very few people buy one. Um, I might have just seriously damaged my own argument. But, you get the idea.

    Someday a PDA, a video game system, a phone, and an mp3 player may all converge in a single cost-effective, battery-efficient device. Until that day it is unlikely consumers will bite on a product that is more than one, but not all of these.

    (Note: If you object to anything above, pretend I prepended it with "In my opinion...)

    1. Re:Hint: by tf23 · · Score: 1

      You want to be able to pause your mp3 player to answer your phone without losing your place

      I would think this is a software issue. And unless the phone did this automatically for you, there's no chance in hell I'd buy it. There are enough issues with people being able to answer the phones they already have before the call goes to voicemail, there's no need to complicate it further.

      you want to be able to run your mp3 player all night without your phone battery being dead in the morning

      Yeah, this is key. For as small as cell phones are becoming, I fail to see where something's going to have the battery power to drive a phone w/ a tiny hd in it for much longer then a day of light use w/o going dead. And that's *if* you could get it to last that long.

      That would just suck. I like being able to listen to the iPod at will, and it's power just lasts and lasts for most tasks If it happens to go dead, fine, but I won't miss a call.

    2. Re:Hint: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One things I've started to see in shops is a flash audio player that speaks Bluetooth headset protocol. So you put a phone in your interior coat pocket somewhere, and you walk around listening to music, when someone calls the phone tells the flash player, the flash player pauses you music and plays a ringing tone. You hit pick up or hang up on the inline remote attached to your headphones, just like you'd hit "next track" if it played something you're tired of hearing.

      If you stop using the audio player, or its batteries die, it'll disconnect from the phone and you'll get a normal, audible ringtone and can get the thing out and use it normally.

    3. Re:Hint: by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting points but we don't have to "think" about "if" someone would try to put an mp3 player in a phone because it's been available for ages. Indeed, putting a PVR in a phone has almost been done in Japan (the phone uses Infrared to tune the cable box to the right channel and starts recording via video input so you can watch it later on your commute). Basically, there are plenty of phones that can play MP3's and yes, even AAC (MPEG4) back and most all the problems you've mentioned have been solved:

      1. "The part's compliment each other poorly" - actually they do compliment each other very well. Phones have memory, digital to analog convertors, places to pug in headphones, speakers, screens to view the track info and buttons to select everything. In addition, a lot of phone manufacturer have already crossed the licensing threshold for MP3 and AAC by supporting those formats for ringtones. Trust me, adding a simple MP3 player adds virtually no cost or hinderance to the manufacturers. In addition, playback quality being as good as say, an iPod is a given. Indeed, for example, some people say the Sharp 902 sounds even better. Storage is currently on SD Cards (typically 1G maximum right now) but you *will* see HDD equiped cellphones real soon now.

      2. "Meanwhile, there's interference. You want to be able to pause your mp3 player to answer your phone without losing your place" - at first I thought you meant radio interference but I see you mean interference with calling. Either way, both are no problem: automatically pause the music for the call and then resume when you finish the call.

      3. "You want to be able to run your mp3 player all night without your phone battery being dead in the morning" - well, it all depends how big your battery is and how efficient your radio is. I must admit 8 hours audio playback and then expecting a day of phone use (how many minutes talking?) would be difficult, but most people do charge their phones. As for when we get fuel cells... well, no problem!

      The key thing with this Motorola phone is that Moto got a licensed from Apple for the DRM. That's the impressive part - they got a legal agreement - not the technical part. Other manufacturer's have AAC playback (the Sharp TM200 springs to mind) but without that DRM support people aren't going to be able to stick iTMS content onto their phone and have it playback, that is, unless they use something like hymn.

      Apple better watch out though - there are a LOT more phones sold every week than iPods and if they restrict their DRM licensing to just a select few, I am sure Microsoft will win out.

    4. Re:Hint: by dabadab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, no one will buy these as noone has bought the Nokia 6230 that has an MP3 player and can be extended with MMC cards.
      Oh no, wait, it sells like hot cakes.
      And, of course, you can record phone calls and ambient noise (that's called "dictaphone") with it. And I, for one, find it a lot more easy to deal with the management of only one battery.
      I don't get your point with regards to pausing the mp3 during a phonecall - I guess that's a feature that shows why convergence is good: if I receive (or make) a call, the mp3 is automatically paused and resumed after the call.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    5. Re:Hint: by paul_nz · · Score: 1

      OK, I've got a Motorala e398, came with a 64MB transflash card, think you can get 256MB now. > No one will buy it. I disagree. People bought ipods didn't they? > you do not want or need the kind of playback quality on a phone that you need in an mp3 player, Crap. The sound quality of the e398 is excellent, and thats exactly what a phone should have. Its a phone remember! And listening to mp3s I use the hands free headset that that don't-annoy-your-neighbour factor >You want to be able to pause your mp3 player to answer your phone without losing your place; Sure. And the mp3 player pauses when a call comes in. Guess what... they already thought of that! > you want to be able to run your mp3 player all night without your phone battery being dead in the morning that I'd agree with - even so, you do get hours of playback - and the phones no larger than an ipod mini Overall - the phone seemed a bit of a gimmick at first but in the end its suprisingly good and works suprisingly well. Sure the interface could do with some optimisation but hey, its mainly a phone!

    6. Re:Hint: by dwater · · Score: 1

      > > You want to be able to pause your mp3 player
      > > to answer your phone without losing your place
      >
      > I would think this is a software issue. And unless
      > the phone did this automatically for you, there's
      > no chance in hell I'd buy it. There are enough
      > issues with people being able to answer the phones
      > they already have before the call goes to
      > voicemail, there's no need to complicate it
      > further.

      My Powerbook already does this - using Salling Clicker - should be easy for a phone.
      --
      Max.
    7. Re:Hint: by zo219 · · Score: 1

      "Convergence" exists in Bill Gates' head, and nowhere else. Everyone was supposed to be watching TV on their home entertainment computer by now, remember? Twelve years and he's still perserverating on that one. Meanwhile Jobs quietly delivers Not-Crap, the consumer recognizes Not-Crap (okay, and it's lickable too,) while Gates blithely leads every poor sod with a gadget down the road to Microsoft Hell. Which, in case this has escaped anyone's attention, is upon us.

      I have terrible but really amusing visions of Gates and Ballmer hung by the shorts, slooowly twisting in the wind, when the day comes that the damage is totaled up. Somehow it make a perfect poem, however, that the world's richest man should also be singlehandedly responsible for the crumbling of the infrastructure. I don't know as much about Linux as I ought, but hope to god it's there to catch us as Microsoft's crap-for-code forks up everything. The Navy? That was just the beginning.

      End of today's Smart-Rant.

    8. Re:Hint: by povvell · · Score: 1

      Interesting argument 'in your opinion'. :-) However falls down on one salient point. My Siemens SX1 will play MP3s in jukebox form while I'm reading an eBook and will interrupt seamlessley for a call. I know because I do this. The battery issue I'll give you, the last time I did this the battery ran out after some 2.5 hours of non stop play/reading. But that's because there's no way to shut off the redundant backlight when using the reader in daylight. Silly Siemens!

    9. Re:Hint: by kliment · · Score: 1

      cache, cache, cache. Load a playlist from the drive to flash, power off the drive, no further drive access until you change your playlist, segmented random play, where tracks are randomly picked off the drive and loaded into flash and the process repeated when all tracks have been played would work also. A hard drive really does not need to create huge power requirements.

    10. Re:Hint: by cakefool · · Score: 1

      6230?
      I just checked that out, and no mmc, no Mp3, no dictaphone.

      The phone you described is the phone I want, but can't find.

    11. Re:Hint: by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Check again
      To quote Nokia's spec:
      "Music player for MP3 and AAC files"
      "Possibility to get additional memory with MMC."
      "Voice recording up to 3 min"
      (And these specs are for real, of course - I have one)

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    12. Re:Hint: by cakefool · · Score: 1

      I looked again, and you are right. One of those things...

  30. Network Ipod? by omarKhayyam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me wonder if Apple has designed a network Ipod that could download songs over a cell network. In my imagination of the product, it wouldn't function as a phone, because that would add unnecessary functionality. Apple has shown that extra functionality isn't always desired by consumers, especially if it's unrelated or inelegant.

    It would look exactely the same as the current Ipod. I think you could browse the store fairly efficiently if they indexed the songs by artist and song title - I bet you could keep it to four clicks maximum without too much scrolling to get to a song from the main index.

    Any thoughts?

    1. Re:Network Ipod? by egork · · Score: 1

      This is a nice feature. Must be really simple from the user standpoint. From a technology point, there must be only a couple more features to add:
      1. 3G/GPRS module
      2. SIM card slot (SIM could be used for DRM too)

      I see issues with configuring the 3G service as there is no textual input on the iPod. But that could be done on the iTunes on PC. Or there could be a central directory for all available operators and download sites.

    2. Re:Network Ipod? by colinleroy · · Score: 1

      Acutally the ipod would require little external modifications to act as a telephone: just add a mic to the headphone. The wheel could be used as a rotary dial.

      I really should have been an hardware designer! ;)

      --
      blah
  31. Carriers? by eseiat · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what cell companies will make this model available in the States? I read TFA and it didn't seem to mention who would be offering this. Are we going to endure another Motorola Razor situation? I think this would be a poor decision by Motorola if they don't get this one out to more providers.

    1. Re:Carriers? by Miphnik · · Score: 1

      I'm sure Motorola would be happy to sell the phone to every carrier under the sun, since they're Motorola's real customers, not you and I (though we are the end users). The real question is, what carrier thinks its customer base (you and I again) will buy the phone?

      --
      "My order takes pride in knowing all that can be known, and most of all the rest..." --Galen
    2. Re:Carriers? by Banshee99 · · Score: 1

      It's carriers playing their games. T-Mobile wanted the first Windows phone from motorola, so they bought exclusive rights to it. Cingular wanted the razr, so they bought exclusive rights to it. Carriers are just as scrupulous as apple and microsoft about exclusive rights. "We want this phone, but if you sell it to anyone else, we won't buy it." They all do it.

    3. Re:Carriers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck do you mean? Why would a certain phone be incompatible with certain carriers? Phones use standards, so you should be able to use any phone with any carrier.

      Unless, of course, the USA is really fucking screwed up. It's not a problem for most of the world.

  32. Oh no! by Cinematique · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quick! Grab your umbrella! There's about to be a flood of crotchedy old techies who think mobile phones that serve more than one purpose are crazy! Crrraaazaaay!!

    Seriously though, I'm not the only one who WANTS to see the day where we have a phone, iPod, and PDA all in one device... right? Sure, bring on the "jack-of-all-trades master-of-none" arguement... but carrying around one device that does it all is better than having multiple gadgets. So what if the current creations need a little more R&D... it's not like basic phones can't be purchased anymore.

    1. Re:Oh no! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I actually want to have them all be separate devices with no redundant equipment (besides their own processors) but then the questions involve connecting them, security if they are connected wireless, and so on. Since the industry has proven itself to be incapable of insurmounting these particular obstacles (in particular, playing nice with others) I'll take convergence devices instead.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Oh no! by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I'm not the only one who WANTS to see the day where we have a phone, iPod, and PDA all in one device... right?

      You forgot "camera."

      Anyway, I'm sure there are lots of people who want a combo device. If there wasn't a market for it, Motorola wouldn't be building it, right?

      it's not like basic phones can't be purchased anymore.

      It's getting harder and harder.The ones they do have are usually more expensive than the feature-laden phones, because the carriers realize that picute messaging and ringtone downloading are the only growth businesses in the industry.

      Personally, though, I don't think anyone has yet come up with a way to build an interface for all these devices that works well enough. Phones have keypads, PDAs have tablet-screens, and iPods have clickwheels. Cameras, if you want to go there, have a button that you can press without your hand obscuring the screen.. Putting all that on a device that fits in a pocket is a huge challenge. Failing to put all that on the device will make it a pain to use.

  33. Forbes & Chicago Tribune on Zander & Motor by joelparker · · Score: 2, Informative
    ...here are some good articles on Zander with no reg required:

    Making Over Motorola: If mobile communication is going to be seamless, Motorola has to be seamless. Forbes Yahoo Business: link

    New chief reconnecting Motorola: Memories of earnings disappointments and last holiday season's product debacle are blurring as investors focus on rising sales and profits. link

  34. Another motobomb? by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
    Are they actually going to make this one in house, or farm it out to some third party again like the MPX line. The MPX-220 was a travishmockey, and I have't heard good things of the MPX either.

    How about fewer models and more QA?

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
    1. Re:Another motobomb? by Banshee99 · · Score: 1

      The MPX line is 100% 3rd party. Everything else is 100% inhouse.

  35. Being a geek is expensive by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    I want it. Why must all geek toys (the GOOD PDAs, good computers, good gadgets, all gadgets before they go mainstream) be expensive? Fooey. But...I like cool toys. So it's more ramen for me while saving up for my next batch of toys.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  36. You aren't looking at the problem right by hellfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I, for one, welcome the chance to have an MP3 player on my phone. Why? Because I don't want to carry 4 portable devices. 1 phone, 1 camera, 1 MP3 player, and one palm pilot. That's effectively what I want and it's what the Treo 600 and 650 give me. Well actually no, I don't really want the camera, but I can't get a high end phone these days without it so I'll deal for now.

    Frankly, I'm going to spend the money on the phone, and I like having a portable entertainment and workstation on my hip at all times, which is what it is. I can take care of simple work tasks just from that phone, and i can entertain myself very easily while waiting or traveling. The Mp3 player doesn't store that many songs and i need a memory card, but hell I don't carry with me that many Mp3s! I'm never going to fill up a 10,000 song player... or even a 1,000 song one.

    Just because you don't want one doesn't mean other people don't. So far the only thing I don't like about those phones are the cameras. Everything else does in fact work great.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree - but for one point - something not dedicated to one task is usually going to be of a lower quality than a conglomerate device.

    2. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      Speaking for myself, a big factor in "quality" is form factor: being able to carry my things around, without the bulk causing my pants to slide down to my ankles.

      So sure, I'll settle for a plastic lens, or the inability to play OGGs, especially since this way I'm always prepared for those unexpected Kodak moments. (And for when I know in advance I'm going to want to take a lot of photos, I have my standalone digital camera.)

    3. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Allright, I'll give it to you. Although, if form factor is key, so should be the interface. I have seen many cell phones with god-awful interfaces to the more advanced features. This, of course, is why I bought an iPod for my MP3 needs. No need for OGGs when that thing does Apple Lossless anyways.

    4. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well actually no, I don't really want the camera, but I can't get a high end phone these days without it so I'll deal for now.

      This is a big problem if you work at (or regularly make site visits to) any R&D organization or a military base. They will tell you that you can't take cameras in, so you have to leave your phone at the gates.

    5. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Calroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking for myself, a big factor in "quality" is form factor: being able to carry my things around, without the bulk causing my pants to slide down to my ankles.

      There's another advantage of converged devices: you can get functions that are a "mix" of the two, which often turn out to be useful in their own right.

      The Treo is a smartphone: a mobile phone and a PDA. But it's called "Treo" because it has three functions: mobile phone, PDA, and mobile Internet. The third function is a mix of the first two.

      It's like mobile phones with cameras. Sure, they have mobile phone and camera capabilities. But the telco industry is betting that people will get into the third capability: sending MMS photo messages to their friends. (Although as of now, it hasn't taken off like SMS has.)

      Having MP3 playback on the Treo has one unexpected, but welcome side-effect: when you're listening to music and a call comes in, you can hear the ring through your headphones. This is a godsend for those of us who play our music loud and would otherwise miss calls...

      (Now, I shall proceed to debunk all my arguments. I admit to owning both a Treo 600 and an iPod shuffle.)

    6. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, phone interfaces are pretty perverse. I find my phone (Sony Ericsson T610) mildly annoying at best, and apparently it's one of the better ones out there!

      That's why I'm waiting for Apple to develop a cell phone. It'll be sleek, elegant, easy to use and cost only half my salary. :)

    7. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Gob+Blesh+It · · Score: 1

      My cameraphone takes the grainiest, shittiest pictures you could imagine, but I'd be totally into taking snapshots and MMSing them around to all my friends like that annoying friend who used to forward you all those chain letters, if only sending MMSes didn't take about forty button clicks on my Sony Ericsson T610. So I think perverse UIs are at least partly to blame for MMS's lack of popularity. Is it any easier on your Treo?

    8. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by thecardinal · · Score: 1

      I got a Siemens SX1, and it fits the bill perfectly.

      I can synch my address book and calendar nicely with Outlook, I can play a lot of the N-Gage and general Symbian games without any major problems.

      Its got a built-in MP3 player, Ogg playback is fantastic. It supports hot-swappable MMC cards (so I could have several 1gig cards queued up).

      And having it all in one handy little bit of black plastic is stupendously handy when out and about running - yesterday, out and about at lunch, listening to some Oggs, saw a Tank coming down the road, started up the camera, took a couple of pictures, still running and listening to the music.

      I just couldn't do that with multiple little boxes, its stupid.

      Oh, and its quite a good phone as well. I just don't understand the people who keep on harping on asking for "A phone that is just a phone". You can buy them - Nokia do a good range of really basic phones.

    9. Re:You aren't looking at the problem right by Calroth · · Score: 1

      Is it any easier on your Treo?

      Go to the Camera app, press the button to take a photo. Click "Send", click "MMS", enter phone number (or look up in address book), click "Send".

  37. Re:FUCK YOU AND YOUR FUCKING WINDOWS! by TekMonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can a moderator or admin ban this guy? Just look at his record. :|

  38. Wasp T12 by Bazman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've got a Wasp T-12 including twin mp3 decks with scrubjockey interface, and sharkproof casing.

    It's been out for three weeks in Japan - where's yours?

    Nathan.

    1. Re:Wasp T12 by Bazman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I posted this message about the spoof Wasp T-12 (well spotted mod who modded it 'Funny') before reading the article. So now tell me which of these phrases come from the E1060 article, and which come from the spoof Wasp T-12 ad:

      * Dynamic idle for personalized portal connections

      * Full spectrum audio dominance

      * share the scoop with rapid ease

      * hoot your trap off

      * 1024 character TXT with full fluid lexicon

      * Double duty - info focused

      tricky...

  39. news ? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1

    I hate to say this.. but havent we known this was coming since forever ? Hasnt it been showcased left and right and been made a big deal over already ?

  40. Who Cares? My Nokia already does that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My Nokia 6230 already plays MP3 and AAC files. I got a 256meg CF in it and bluetooth sync it to my library on my laptop. As far as WMV, or whatever, I couldnt care less.

  41. Don't get too excited... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither the press release nor the Reuters article says the Motorola phone will handle Apple's DRM or music purchased from the iTunes Music Store, only that it will work with the "iTunes format". Without explicitly mentioning the iTMS, in my mind that just means the phone will decode unencumbered AAC. Big woop.

  42. Yeah? Well where my... by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    AAC support huh? I want to fit 2 times as many songs on there with better quality! Truthfully, I'm really waiting for more of this...

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  43. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The OP is a troll. You can find PLENTY of phones that are not stacked with features. You would be hard pressed to find one without a web browser, but that's just software. It's trivial to get phones without bluetooth, with no camera, without a case designed primarily for easy housing replacement, without a joystick, et cetera. YHBT. HTH, HAND.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  44. Re:Boo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFA, hell, RTF description at the top of the page.

  45. mp3/m4a/m4p/wma ringtones and hold music by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    There's actually several good reasons for a phone to have music support:

    Ringtones and hold music.

    You call your buddy with an iTunes phone and are put on hold. What do you hear? How about something from Schubert? Someone calls you, and what do you hear? Why not Snoop Dog?

    Yes, some people will think it's stupid and some people will think it's annoying.

    1. Re:mp3/m4a/m4p/wma ringtones and hold music by mcc · · Score: 4, Funny

      You call your buddy with an iTunes phone and are put on hold. What do you hear? How about something from Schubert? Someone calls you, and what do you hear? Why not Snoop Dog?

      I believe the benefits conferred by this feature will be more than cancelled out by the resulting conspicuously high murder rate among users of the feature.

    2. Re:mp3/m4a/m4p/wma ringtones and hold music by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      So do you agree that users will purchase this phone just for that functionality?

      I think they will :)

      Especially if it's music they can grab from their own CD collections!

  46. Re:Boo! by Space_Soldier · · Score: 1

    Excuse me, but 2 shops isn't enough. I want to able to buy from any shop I want.

  47. Ridiculous by Qwavel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, no more anouncements of products that aren't expected for 3Q's.

    If it is currently expected in Q4 2005, that means 50% it will be cancelled before it comes out, and 50% chance it will ship 6 months late. EVen if it does ship on time, announcing it today doesn't make much sense (it guess it makes pr sense, but not practical sense).

  48. Its slashdot by ad0gg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Phones that take flash cards and can play mp3s have been out for over year. Slashdot crowd is getting old as you can tell with all the +5 insight posts that say "All I want is phone that just makes call". Its like talking with my dad, he compains his simple cell phone is too complicated and its 4 years old and it does is make phone calls(no camera,no ring polymoric ring tones, no web. He doesn't even know how to check his voicemail.

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  49. Yay! Another WMA Phone! by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
    Now between this and the Nokia, I can unwittingly download all the latest spyware! Thanks M$!

    I can't wait until I can replace my Samsung!

    (yes I know, dupe of joke, how original :)

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  50. format...!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    iTunes compatible, realplayer compatible??
    i don't want to deal with a shitty "music library" interface to download my tunes to the phone. what ever happened to seeing the device show up as a drive that you can just dump mp3 files onto?
    is that so much to ask for?

    also, why support ALL these damn formats and not even include the one FREE one (ogg).

  51. Re:FUCK YOU AND YOUR FUCKING WINDOWS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not anymore, michael no longer works for Slashdot and co.

  52. Before You Say 'Another Useless Gadget'... by fupeg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Go down to your local mall and its food court. Take a look at the teenagers down there and what they are doing. There has become a huge culture built around cell phones -- talking (of course), text messaging, picture mail, wallpaper, and especially ring tones. I've seen primetime TV ads lately for companies selling animated cell phone wallpaper. It's big business. The iPod, as amazingly popular as it is, is just starting to become a fixture of youth culture. So there just might be some serious money to be made in the convergence.

    1. Re:Before You Say 'Another Useless Gadget'... by n4ru70+f4n · · Score: 0

      So there just might be some serious money to be made in the convergence.

      Yes, there is definately serious money in the converge. But choosing to support Real Player isn't the best idea in the world. First off, in my opinion, Real PLayer doesn't really have a good user interface. Second is compatability. It is because of the fact that Real Player is only compatable with MPEG-4/WMV/WMA/MP3 file formats that a problem stems. There are many more file formats out there, most of which I use personally, that cannot be handled by phone. However, I'm particularly disappointed that that it is also iTunes compatable. they could've at least gone with iRiver.

  53. Time to dust off those old 78s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get a recond player.

    Oh! And one of those phones you have to crank.

    PS - The wagon is leaving for the west at high noon. You better get on.

  54. Breaking stuff by Centurix · · Score: 1

    The problem I find with combination of things is that if one of the components breaks and you have to send the device back, you're down the other components too. Like having a fax/copier/answering machine/combines hat and shoe rack, if the fax breaks and you have to return it you're all of a sudden stuck with nowhere to hang your hat and shoes.

    I have a motorola e398 which has 'stereo' speakers on either side of the unit, a camera, a largish colour LCD and 64Mb of RAM for storing MP3's too. If the CCD breaks for some reason, I have to send the phone back to get it fixed, and then I'll be without a phone.

    --
    Task Mangler
  55. Are we sure this is the iTunes phone? by ArsEric · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering if this really the long-awaited iTunes phone. I saw this on Reuters earlier today and closely read Motorola's press release, which doesn't say a thing about iTunes support. If this phone does support iTunes, I would imagine both Apple and Motorola would be trumpeting the fact, given the great fanfare around the announcement of the partnership last July.

  56. mpx220 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the motorola mpx220 already supports all of those formats and more with freely available software that is easily installed.

    it also has a mini-sd slot for storing volumes of music and data.

    you can but it today. it runs windows smartphone and is very versatile.

  57. Whatever happened to the E680? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    I mean, that phone looked to be the shiznit. Now, bupkus. The A780 is the closest thing to something that may actually exist in white market form in the US, but it's way too expensive.

    Then again, what with UMTS coming in the next year or so, it's probably a bad idea to get hung up on something that can only do GPRS..

  58. I am the target audience. by ajna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am the target audience. I bought an 1G iPod within 4 months of its release, I switch cell phones and providers every year to take advantage of the rebates, and my Mac is indispensible to me due to the synchronization of my calendar and contacts via iSync over Bluetooth to whatever cellphone is flavor-of-the-year.

    And this phone will almost definitely become my next pick: my 1G iPod just died (not of battery issues -- I replaced that with a Newer Tech high capacity unit a while ago), my phone contract only has a few months left on it, and this advice would therefore let me slim down my pockets by cutting a theoretical iPod Shuffle out of the loop.

    With so many phones on the market -- just browse through the US, GSM Nokia lineup sometime if you want to make your head spin -- there needs to be differentiation. All phones are reasonably small, and smaller yet is not worth $400 to me. All phones that I'd consider use Bluetooth and furthermore have adequate to excellent RF reception for all the neo-Luddites out there clamoring for "just a phone. sheesh". iTunes syncing is just the ticket for those like me on the fence.

  59. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by DarkVader · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, but I like those features fine.

    I want a big one.

    Nobody makes a phone big enough for me anymore. i want a phone that extends from my ear to my mouth, and can rest comfortably on my shoulder. I'm not interested in putting it in my pocket, I'll clip it to my belt, thanks. But I'm sick of small telephones.

    Oh, and one more little feature that I want - GOOD VOICE QUALITY. I can almost live without big for that one.

  60. MP3 player like Digital Clock was in the past by gathas · · Score: 1
    I think putting an MP3 player into digital devices is going to be this decades equivalent to sticking a crappy digital clock onto everything.

    People are afraid of new things. You should have just taken an existing product and put a clock on it or something. -- Homer, on the baby translator, "Brother, Can You Spare Two Dimes?"

  61. Ugly and not enough memory by ian+rogers · · Score: 1

    I was really interested in the idea of a phone/iPod(Shuffle) combo when I first heard about it. I figured that Motorola and Apple could really make something happen, especially with the work that was going on with the Shuffle. Sadly enough, this seems to be more of a phone with 32mb of storage tacked on.

    With the size of the iPod Shuffle, and the low price, you would think they could cut it in half, remove the buttons (the controls would be software based on the phone), and stick it inside a phone.

    I was waiting to upgrade my phone until the new Apple/Motorola stuff came out, because I was looking forward to a phone that would work with the Bluetooth on my iBook, and also would serve the purpose of an iPod Shuffle, all in one. Sadly enough, it looks like I'll be carrying my Shuffle and a cell phone around separately, because I never go anywhere without either of them now.

    I guess I'll just buy a small clamshell phone with Bluetooth on it, and tape my iPod Shuffle to it.

  62. Re:Boo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once again RTFA.

  63. iPhone this is not :: No Hot News from Apple by tyrione · · Score: 1

    I think we're jumping the gun here on this being the iTunes Motorola Phone. Even Motorola doesn't list iTunes in it's feature specs.

    As many have pointed out Apple designs the physical interfaces for all of its branding products--if iTunes were in the phone it would mean that iPod OS would be on the phone. This is just an MPEG-4 compliant phone.

  64. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nokia makes lots of fairly large phones which do indeed reach from ear to at least near the mouth.

    Good voice quality? Good luck. Maybe if we get WiFi phones and places to use them...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  65. Re:Oh no! Crazy old techie here by puto · · Score: 1

    Who also works for cingular wireless GASP.

    i have a nokia 3600 blue tooth phone, have had it for a year, use blue tooth for a headset. Have 12 mb mmc stuck in back. Gotta couple of odd pics on it.

    I have a pocket pc, and IPOD. And countless other gadgets.

    At 35 this crotchety old techie who access to all things celluar, uses his phone to make and place calls. Pocket PC looks pretty on desk, ipod goes on vacations with me.

    I only carry the phone. Cause I came to the realization about a year ago there was a whole lot more to life than me being connected to the net and gizmoed out.

    The day I need these three things to make my life complete, well is the day I need to consider a change of careers and habits.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  66. Nokia market is important by saha · · Score: 1
    Apple should be wary of the Microsoft Nokia deal. Especially when you consider Nokia's market share and Microsoft DRM which offers either al-a-carte or subscription model.

    Mobile phone shipments and market shares for 2004

    Rank Vendor 2004 Shipments 2004 Market Share

    1 Nokia 207,600,000 31.2%
    2 Motorola 104,500,000 15.7%
    3 Samsung 86,500,000 13.0%
    4 Siemens 49,400,000 7.4%
    5 LG Electronic 44,400,000 6.7%
    Other 172,000,000 25.9%
    Total 664,500,000 100.0%
    Now if Apple managed to get iTunes licensed for the top five leaders then it would be in good shape.
  67. Me too by wirefarm · · Score: 1

    I work in an IT/Internet company in Tokyo and every few days, someone in the office pulls out yet another latest and greatest cellphone with a higher resolution camera, better ringtones, bells, whistles, doo-dads. Mine is an old piece of junk that doesn't do much of anything. It has some sort of proprietary email function that I have never used, expensive web access, I think, again never used.
    Recently, a company Tu-ka came out with a new model that caught my eye - their "S" model, a nearly featureless phone. It has no camera or web or email. It doesn't have an address book. For that matter, it doesn't even have any sort of display. It has an LED to let you know that it's on, I think, and that's it. If you miss a call, well, you had better hope they call back. If you catch the call, you have to ask who's calling.

    On the upside, it has 840 hours of standby and 240 minutes of talk time in the battery. The operation is exceedingly simple and straightforward. The buttons are large and the sound is clear. For talking, it's a great phone. As you may have guessed, the target market is Japan's elderly, for many of whom this will be a first cellphone, probably a direct upgrade to a black bakelite rotary phone. The advertisements show old people in kimono.

    For me, I want one because it will do what I want it to and nothing more. It will never become obsolete. As for showing it off to my cow-orkers, sure, maybe for a few laughs, but it will be pretty clear that I'm just not playing along. If it only had a rotary dial...

    More and more, I'm getting away from the needless gadgets that used to clutter up my life. Where I used to say "always be charging," I now grab a couple of rolls of black and white film for my camera, my notebook and a pen and head out the door. My pictures are better for it, my notes more accessible and will never become unreadable because the hardware has become obsolete. I don't read e-books -- I read books. Sure, my music collection is a server full of MP3s, but I tend to listen at home, using speakers, rather than on my now-obsolete 5GB iPod.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  68. MPX(300) Kicks Ass - QWERTY Keyboard! by Myriad · · Score: 1
    The MPX-220 was a travishmockey, and I have't heard good things of the MPX either.

    Well you'll hear something good now!

    For those of you who've never heard of it, Motorola's MPX aka the MPX300 (pre-production model number) is the first phone to have a dual-hinged clamshell design. It can open in portrait mode (phone number pad has precedence) or landscape (qwerty has precedence)

    Have a look at http://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/images/0, ,48,00.html

    They're not available through any providers yet, but I got one off eBay and you can now get it from Tiger Direct. This phone has Bluetooth, 802.11b, GPRS, and IRDA all in one! Drop a 1gig SD card into the SDIO slot and you've got loads of storage.

    Having had one for a month now: if you're a hardcore PDA user this might be underpowered, particularly in the ram dept. If you want always on Internet for E-Mail, IM, SSH, Terminal Services, VNC, and general communication then it kicks ASS.

    I can listen to MP3's, watch videos, SSH into my servers (and actually type no stupid pecking or stylus squiggles), have voice dialing through my bluetooth headset (realtime voice recognition, no pre-recorded voice labels), etc, all in one device.

    I hate carrying multiple devices around. This is, by far, the best all-in-one I've found. Is it perfect? No, but it's damned good.

    You mention they were farmed out, would you know to whom?

    Blockwars: free, multiplayer, head-to-head on-line game.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:MPX(300) Kicks Ass - QWERTY Keyboard! by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
      How's the battery life and the reception? Those were the two biggest complaints I've heard.

      The whole Mpx line is actually made by compal. (note how it has a TI instead of a moto processor. Does moto have an ARM in thier processor lineup?) Or was, as Moto just severed their relationship with them, so I've heard.

      --
      Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  69. Re:Holster Rig by sasha328 · · Score: 1

    For that, you'll need a holster rig...

    I actually know someone who uses an underarm holster rig to hold his mobile phone. It's not a bad idea really considering that he actually uses it when wearing "overalls" and works with chainsaws.
    It is also concealed but close to the chest (sensitive area) so he can feel the vibration even when working in noisy surroundings.

  70. No iTunes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except there's no mention of iTunes on the Motorola product page. There is however a press release about the new IMS features of the new phone, which in this case means Instant Messaging Service, not iTunes Music Store. Is Reuters suffering acronym overload?

  71. Clickwheel? by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

    Is that a Click Wheel on the E1060? If they collaborated with Apple, maybe they licensed the Click Wheel and are using it for navigating the phone's functions. It may make it easier to access them.

  72. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by happypork · · Score: 1

    The Nokia 6600 is one such largish phone. As far as voice quality, my 6600 performs quite happily on T-Mobile. The sound isn't bad at all.

  73. The Geeks Alternative? by Paraplex · · Score: 1

    I'm still struggling to understand this line of thinking... (and also the current line of thinking of phone manufacturers, although I can see how it is economically favourable to lock you into proprietary systems)

    Why can't we be running bluetooth enabled mobile PDAs? Ie. A PDA running the same file system as a PC, running the OS of your choice (probably a lean VNC capable version of linux?) It would only need very basic specs as it would simply be an input and network device
    =======

    1/ You could simply VNC to your home PC when in a wi-fi area or use the phone company network to VNC when not in a wi-fi area -

    2/ You could access itunes from your PC to stream MP3s from yours or anyone's computer... (300gig of music in your pocket anyone?)

    3/ Hell, you could even play Halflife 2 (optimistic perhaps.. i'm not sure of the limitations of mobile data rates, but I can't imagine this is too far away for wi-fi these days)

    4/ I could buy a PDA with a camera on it (if they don't make them, they should) or I could buy a camera with bluetooth support (if they don't make them they should).

    5/ Literally any software I wanted to run... Voice recognition... anything I need a 3ghz to process could pass instructions back to a PDA for offline use.. I could stack commands and send at once to avoid using too much online call time (until call costs go down, or until people stop considering "calls" and start accepting nothing less than permanent mobile net connectivity..)

    6/ The possibilities are endless... Hey I'm just thinking even something crazy like if someone said "I just bought a new dirigible" I could press a button and say "define dirigible" and it would send it to by home PC running dragon dictate or some such, DD would send it to google and audio stream back the response in text to speech, allowing me to know what a dirigible was and how much I wanted one of my own... *within seconds*.... ("Tank, I need the program to operate a 1930s dirigible" or your matrix quote of choice) Hey! Try do that with a motorola!...

    7/ And last but not least, I could make phone calls on it on the road over the telephone system and VOIP calls when in wi-fi areas.. just like a regular mobile (but with VOIP!)

    =====

    My life is on my desktop PC. I don't want to be trying to duplicate it on 512mb.

    Any comments? Am I missing something? This is just a modern application of existing technology as far as i'm aware... Has anyone got a system like this one running currently?

    'plex

  74. It's kinda kewl, but... by omnix · · Score: 1

    I think it's a kewl looking phone, albeit for someone younger. This isn't really a ground-breaking phone, like the PalmOne Treo, Siemens SX66, et. al. But I think convergence is a good thing when it makes sense or the technologies overlap. Why carry around a PDA, cell phone, GameBoy, and have 30 remote controls at home, when you can have them all in one, for about the price of just the PDA?

    The problem I have with this phone is, Motorola makes it. Moto, can't write good software for making a device compatible with a real computer to save their life. Oh, and don't even think about trying to write you're own code... They'll sue you quicker than you can say "GPL".

    I'm still waiting for ASUS or Dell to market a smartphone with a 40 GB harddrive, 1+ MP camera, good display, stereo output and decent built-in software. Hell, I don't even care if it is M$ based. As long as I can buy and/or write code for it, and it has decent integration with my PC regardless of my OS. Bluetooth and Wi-Fi would also be mandatory.

    You know, the funny thing is, I don't need the thing to have the normal dimensions of a phone, because I hardly ever put any phone to my ear any more. I find Bluetooth and speakerphone (as a backup) is sufficient in most places...

  75. Re:iPod Killer by TG1 · · Score: 1

    It's an iPod killer in what way exactly? It's ugly and it has 32mb ram. I'm not sure how this is news exactly, as almost every other mobile phone that has been released in the past 6 months can play MP3s. Yes, it can play WMA files (as can numerous other mobile phones) and it can hook up to iTunes. Great.

  76. So mentioning testicles..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Automatically gets you a +5 funny, because that is really the only funny comment in the whole damned post. Well in that case...

    Testicles.

  77. answering machine by cas2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who cares about a phone with non-essential frills like camera, games, or mp3 (or whatever) player?

    what i want is a mobile phone with a built in digital answering machine, similar to what you can get for under $50 for a land line....or even better, use a 128+MB flash "disk" and mp3 or ogg to encode the recorded messages

    i suspect that i'll never see one, though, because telcos are the biggest customers for mobile phone manufacturers, and telcos definitely do not want to lose the revenue stream that they get for charging by the minute for people to retrieve their voice mail.

    i resent paying those fees, and i certainly do not want MY messages stored on THEIR systems - i want them on MY machine.

    1. Re:answering machine by kliment · · Score: 1
      now that is a damn good Idea. I was working on a phone design earlier, linux-based. I'll make sure to think of how to include one of these (considering it already has voice record features, not too hard.

      The main issue with this is that you have no answering machine if your phone battery runs out or you go out of range. That was the thought that put answering machine functions on the network, not on the phone. With long battery lives and better network coverage this problem is dimished, but not removed.

    2. Re:answering machine by cas2000 · · Score: 1

      > The main issue with this is that you have no
      > answering machine if your phone battery runs
      > out or you go out of range.

      in that case, the telco will probably just divert the call to their voicemail system - which is provided as a standard "option" on most (if not all) mobile networks these days.

      although "option" isn't really the right word because it's nearly impossible to turn off and has, in my experience, a mysterious habit of turning itself back on without warning (whenever the telco resets their systems, perhaps? or whenever the telco decides it's time to generate more revenue from voicemail).

      one of the things that really pisses me off about the voicemail from my current mobile service is that the damn thing diverts to voicemail after only THREE rings. i almost never get my phone out of my pocket or answer the call in that short a time. i ended up just disabling voicemail (i'd rather miss a call entirely than have to pay per minute to get a message that i would have answered myself in just another ring or two. if it was important, they'd send an sms or email or something). but it has mysteriously re-enabled itself.

      in theory, the voicemail service allows you to set it to divert after 10 rings or so - but in practice, it also has a mysterious habit of resetting itself to just 3 rings. very bloody annoying.

      i'm going to ditch this telco (telstra, australia) as soon as my pre-paid SIM runs out (not long now, with their absurd pricing). it was a mistake to buy their service, and i knew it was probably going to be a mistake when i bought it - i was just in a hurry and needed a phone service quickly.

      > That was the thought that put answering
      > machine functions on the network, not on the
      > phone. With long battery lives and better
      > network coverage this problem is dimished, but
      > not removed.

      i suspect that the actual thought was "how can we gouge even more money out of our customers?". the answer, of course, is to give them a "free" service which costs them a fortune.

      they get to double-dip, too. first they get income from the call that leaves the message, especially if the call is from their own network. then they get more from their customers when they retrieve the message.

      it's better than a license to print money.

  78. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by andynz · · Score: 1
    Your prayers have been answered.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/09/jablotron_ big_mobile/

    You may want to get a stronger belt though.

  79. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by stupid_is · · Score: 1
    Get this one then :-)

    --
    -- Intelligence is soluble in alcohol
  80. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    I'm not interested in putting it in my pocket, I'll clip it to my belt, thanks.

    You're not interested in getting laid at all, either, are you.

  81. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

    Check out http://www.pokia.com/. They make adaptors to plug conventional analog phone receivers into cellphones. In fact, some of their fancier models even have bluetooth, so you can be walking down the street, talking on the batphone, while your call is routed through your normal cellphone in your pocket. I think it's a pretty sweet idea.

  82. Deja Vu? by Jahz · · Score: 1

    Does this "technology convergence" thing remind anyone of the insane barage of all-in-one personal devices introduced during the dot-com era?

    Generally such devices fail miserably when the economy is not booming... but its still nice to see.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who do not.
  83. E1060 Super-High Resolution Images by Xoo · · Score: 1

    Here are a couple of really high res images (cached) of the front and back of the new E1060 cell phone:

    Front

    Back

    --
    Karma police, arrest this man, he talks in maths....
  84. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's probably married or in a long term relationship, the implication being that he masturbates a lot.

  85. Re:Holster Rig by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    It is also concealed but close to the chest (sensitive area) so he can feel the vibration even when working in noisy surroundings.

    "Excuse me, I have to take this call. It's making my nipples hard."

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  86. How much more must I pay... by mwood · · Score: 1

    ...for a phone *without* digital music toys in it?

  87. But sometimes you get burned by Merk · · Score: 1

    I got a Motorola V600 phone from AT&T because it had bluetooth. Unfortunately, Apple never got iSync over Bluetooth working with the phone. I've heard that the phone doesn't properly comply with bluetooth specs, but I'm still really surprised that a year later, the only way I've found to get iSync working is to buy a USB cable. Kinda defeats the whole bluetooth feature.

  88. I don't get it by flanman · · Score: 1

    How can this phone claim to support iTunes when it doesn't support AAC/AAC+??

    The way it looks to me is that it's a MP3 player with add-on support for windows media player. Largely from within the Java space.

    1. Re:I don't get it by ahillen · · Score: 2, Informative

      How can this phone claim to support iTunes when it doesn't support AAC/AAC+??

      AAC is part of the MPEG-4 standard, which this phone supports...

    2. Re:I don't get it by flanman · · Score: 1

      Ah....I stand corrected....and so do my so-called in house experts.

      Thank you.

  89. huh? by PDubNYC · · Score: 1

    What does that even mean? "Something that does more than one thing is usually going to be of a lower quality than a device that does more than one thing" is how I read it.

    What's your sig say? I can't quite make it out...

  90. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by DarkVader · · Score: 1

    Not from a girl who wants to do me for my cell phone, no.

    Trust me on this one - if she sees a fancy cell phone and wants you, she's in it for the money. Run.

  91. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah but if she sees a cell phone at all and it's attached to a giant belt clip, she's not going to want you, money or no....

  92. Re:Oh no! Crazy old techie here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The day I need these three things to make my life complete, well is the day I need to consider a change of careers and habits.


    Yeah, or could do that ... or choose a Frontal Lobotomy ... whatever floats your boat.

  93. CORRECTION: Please Read by amichalo · · Score: 1

    As submitter of the original story to Slashdot, I am embarrassed to post this retraction based on new information from Mac Observer.

    Though Motorola demonstrated the E1060's ability to play iTunes music at the GSM World Congress "the E1060 is not going to have the ability to play iTunes songs" according to Jason Gales of Mobile Tracker.

    A thousand pardons.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  94. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by biglig2 · · Score: 1

    Woo, think of the battery life you'd get on a phone that size...

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  95. Re: Keeping the quarterly numbers up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if that "giant belt clip" were attached to his TRON costume? Eh, smart guy?