Slashdot Mirror


Google Building Tech Center Near Portland

jdray writes "It seems that everyone's favorite search powerhouse, Google, is building a tech center in The Dalles, Oregon. About 45 minutes by interstate highway from Portland, The Dalles is a small, economically depressed city near the world-famous Columbia River Gorge. The $60,000 average annual salary of Google employees is about double the average for Wasco county. With all the outdoor sports (windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing) in the area, sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility."

328 comments

  1. Cheap so and so's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the same thing when they built one in Soho (London)... but then realised that their average salary was approximatly 100k under the average for Soho. Ho hum!

  2. Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by HarryCaul · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Formerly known as slashdot.

    Seriously guys, it's getting to be a bit much.

    Google is a company with a nice product. That's about it.

    1. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by grazzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, ssh, quiet down, they're "searching".

    2. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, all true geeks nurse a desire to work at Google. Which is why (a) Slashdot keeps doing drool drool articles about them; and (b) they don't really need anybody's help recruiting people. Indeed, unless you have a really good resume, you probably shouldn't even bother.

    3. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, all true geeks nurse a desire to work at Google.

      Errr, no they don't. Some geeks nurse a desire, and in a classic bit of "creating the earth in their image" they imagine that therefore all geeks want to work at Google. Search and making web apps that do type ahead really isn't the most personally fulfilling thing one can imagine.

    4. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by fm6 · · Score: 1

      If you think Google is mainly about "web apps that do typeahead", you know very little about them. Which means you know very little about geekdom.

    5. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by tricops · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed. Some geeks nurse a desire, others desire a nurse.... everyone has their own wants and desires!

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
    6. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, my cheeks are starting to hurt!! MOD parent
      geek up!!!!

    7. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 0

      Hey, ssh, quiet down, they're "searching".

      Don't you mean Googling?

      From what I hear, the term "Googling" is now the word that means "searching".

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    8. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, people just don't want to work at Microsoft like they used to. Or IBM. And I don't believe Apple is hiring anywhere near the degree that Google is. Still, though, it does seem like Slashdot is acting almost like Monster.com or something.

    9. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by mattspammail · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear dummy,

      Next time you plan to speak derogitorally about us, we'd suggest you post anonymously.

      Sincerely,

      Google

      P.S. You know that GMAIL invitation you just got? You can forget it now (unless you like spam). Whooo hoo haa ha ha ha ha.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    10. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by 2004.3 · · Score: 1

      /Monster.dot.com?

    11. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Google never had a product, it has a service. And it's a branding monster that wants to expand its "services" / tentacles all over the place.

      They're out to lasso that massive herd of know-nothing people who use computers at home and work to be dependent on them and they will drag the rest of us in their wake.

      Eventually, they'll become like Microsoft and AOL in terms of crushing the innovative start-ups that they can't / won't buy out.

      Well, at least AOL is dying a slow, inexorible death as is Microsoft 1.0 (Microsoft 2.0 may be an open source company).

      Google just wants to fill the power vacuum.

    12. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Brockeolus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't dispute the fact that they get a disproportionate amount of coverage on slashdot, but to be fair I think Google is more than just a company with a "nice product." They have shown that it is possible to make money with innovative products while adhering to a code of ethics. Whatever may underlie this appearance, they at least seem to be a model of good-faith business practices.

    13. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by udayb · · Score: 1

      These days, even if Google sneezes, it gets /.ed. Looking at the content of these numerous google articles in the past few months, one can easily conclude that a large proportion of them aren't "Stuff that matters". There should be an end to this left-right-center posting on Google.

    14. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you think Google is mainly about "web apps that do typeahead", you know very little about them.

      I realize that some people are blinded by their Google-awe, and in this case it led you to skip over the clear fact that my post actually said "Search and...". Hey, let's not let facts get in the way of our zealotry, right? If you don't think that Google is 99% about search, then you're beyond the point of any hope.

      Google is not a special snowflake. The only reason Google rose to the ranks of low-level geek herodom is because they entered a market that many others were doing pretty well (when Google entered the market Excite was easily as competent at search, albeit their massive clutterfactory of an interface didn't make them the kiddy fans. OMG EXCITE@HOME! ), but Google brought a new, minimalist interface, and a business model to go along with it, as opposed to the massive cost-sinks of AltaVista/Excite. Wow. Sign me up.

    15. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      You don't think I know what a you-googly is?

    16. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by darkpixel2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey--this is big news out here in the Gorge.

      It means someone will finally drag decent internet services out here. Currently I have to connect at 42k because the phone lines are shitty, and the providers suck. If you are in one of the 'bigger' cities you can get 512k DSL for something on the order of $45/mo. It really sucks hearing my friend say he has 6MB down/3MB up for the same price in Portland...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    17. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by googisgod · · Score: 1

      while some of you may be wishing for GoogleRecruiting.com,
      what you need to be reading is http://www.fuckedgoogle.com/

    18. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Far from it. This guy ended up passing on a Google interview. I have to admit the google hype is getting to me too. Desktop Search -- does anyone really use? It's not for linux for one, so that rules me out.

      And what was with Google jerking around that blogger guy? First they told him to take down his blog, so he did. A few days, after the blogsphere freaked out, Eric & Larry where worried about "looking evil" (never mind acting) and told him it put it back up after being edit by Google, which, again, he did. Then a few days latter, the freakin' fired him anyway!

      And why? Because he leaked company information in the form of "we've got some great products coming out & are going to have a great year!" Either that or they didn't like him pointing out that every "perk" they provide is targeted at keeping people at work. ANd when it came to things outside work -- such as healthcare -- they're mediocre at best. (Also with they claim to hire the top 1% but only offer salaries at the 50% range.)

      Now they've taken over the Firefox homepage and, oh, and then teased the world with gmail, making it look like some exclusive frat, then the fucked up dejanews (which they had "rebranded" to google groups), and all along the way refusing to discuss blocks of "uncompliant information" in China.

      So work there for what? To watch the people lucky enough to have signed on before the IPO buy their BMWs and new houses while I continue to drive a piece of shit? Because when I type a few words into an text input field it's show me a couple of webpages and a bunch of ads?

      Pardon my french, but fuck that.

    19. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I'm tempted to argue with your shallow version of the browser wars, but what's the point?

      So what if Google is 99% about search? That's like saying NASA just shoots off rockets. Finding stuff is hard.

    20. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I'm not questioning whether Google does a lot of neat stuff - obviously they do. I'm questioning this idea that every "geek" is agog over Google the great, desperately wishing they could work for such a benevolent overlord. There are geeks who feel this way, but there are a lot that find the Google love hard to comprehend.

      It's just a large organization, and what they do really isn't that amazing. It isn't. 90% of Google's supremecy has to do with innovative business plans, not innovative software (Google is expending investments and development in areas that most other post-.com contenders pulled out as untenable), so if you want to look at why Google is huge right now, it's the annoying executives rather than the rank and file geeks.

    21. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      Hey, ssh, quiet down, they're "searching".

      Way to be 733t, dude.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    22. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility.

      You mean... nobody?

    23. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you desire to nurse a nurse?

    24. Re:Welcome to GoogleRecruiting.com by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the freak-fest, B3ryllium!
      give in to the power of the tea.
      See you at the d-a-i-y-e spa!

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  3. $60,000 isn't that much by no+parity · · Score: 1

    Are they all hoping for stock options, or are they working "for the glory"?

    1. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by mtrichardson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is in a place like The Dalles...

    2. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you compare it to the salary surveys that seem to go around, no, it doesn't look anything magical. If you compare it to reality, however, then $60,000 is pretty respectable when you consider all the benefits they get.

      I'm thinking that Google is pulling the old 'provide everything at work, and make work so "fun" that they'll stay all hours' trick. This works for a while, but when your employees start getting girlfriends and kids, it kinda goes to pot. Still, as previous news stories here have shown us, married, old staff are not as innovative or useful as young hopefuls, so perhaps this plan isn't so bad on Google's part after all.

      Heck, I know coders who make $30,000 a year in major metropolitan areas without Googlesque benefits. Google are just placing themselves above the average in an increasingly popular trend.. but they're no Microsoft, that's for sure.

    3. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by 0racle · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Most Technology workers aren't worth what they're paid anyway. They should consider themselves very lucky to get paid that much.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    4. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's about time /.ers got real about salaries. $60k is a bloody awful lot of money

    5. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by nybble_me · · Score: 4, Funny

      **AVERAGE** That means that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year. I'm sure they have receptionists and janitors making way less.

      --

      reenigne
    6. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **AVERAGE** That means that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year.

      No. That's the median.

      I guess we all know which side of the median you're on.

    7. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by goober1473 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone considered that the move is to reduce costs? In the UK anywhere near London carries a huge cost to employees in housing etc, where as the north of England is much cheaper. With these kind of underlying cost cuts google could be looking to cut the staffing budget.

    8. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Cromac · · Score: 1
      it's about time /.ers got real about salaries. $60k is a bloody awful lot of money

      That depends entirely on where you live. It's 20k less than the position I accepted last week. I wouldn't take a job for only $60k in King County where the median house price is $350k.

    9. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by ISaidItOmega · · Score: 1

      Hahaha, thats exactly what the median means: that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year! The *average* would still be $60,000/year if 1 person made $59MM a year and 999 people made $1,001/year. You suck!!

    10. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if they really are geeks, then according to the stereotype, they're probably single. 60,000 dollars a year when you don't have to take care of anyone but yourself is wonderful. Besides, if everyone around you only makes 30,000, your cost of living will most definitely be cheaper than when everyone around you makes the same as you.

    11. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The other cool thing about England is that some cheaper towns can almost rival London in terms of culture and will offer a better quality of life. Manchester is my favourite example, I know a few people (myself included) who call it "London Up North". Newcastle is also getting better, though I don't think it's quite there yet.

    12. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Marvelicious · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, but in the Dalles, $60k - well sorry it isn't "a bloody awful lot of money" in american dollars - but it is definately a VERY decent living wage in a place like that. That $350k would buy you a really nice house with a healthy chunk of property out there. Plus it won't take you six hours to commute across town like King county.

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    13. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's 30k less than the job I took 6 months ago in Minneapolis, and I'm right about average for a network guy. I know Windows server admins making more than I do.

      $60k is a crap salary unless you are just out of college.

    14. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by japhmi · · Score: 1

      If someone offered me $60k, I'd jump. Especially with lower costs in The Dalles.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    15. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by taped2thedesk · · Score: 3, Interesting
      **AVERAGE** That means that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year. I'm sure they have receptionists and janitors making way less.

      You're thinking of the median. The average is the sum of every employee's salary, divided by the number of employees. This is easily affected by exceptionally low and/or high salaries.

      The median is the 'middle' salary, when the salaries have been arranged in order. This is much more 'stable', in the sense that exceptional salaries wouldn't affect it much.

      So, the mean actually does a better job than the median in terms of exposing exceptionally low salaries. This means that either they have a lot of very highly-paid people to offset the low salaries of receptionists and janitors, or that the receptionists and janitors don't make too bad of a salary.

      (Or the more likely reason: they probably outsource the low-paying jobs, especially food-service and janitoral) to an outside company, so those salaries aren't directly paid by the company... those wouldn't be included in the average/mean or median.)

    16. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by plalonde2 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This idea that rural sourcing is good for employees is a fallacy.

      An anectode: a friend of mine was offered two faculty positions, one in a rural setting and one in a large city. The salary was a little higher in the large city. When the rural school argued "but homes here cost only $100k, but they cost $300k in the city" my friend answered: "then it's clear, I must accept the position in the city". "But why?" "Because in 20 years I'll have a $300k home, while in your town I'll be worth $100k plus some gadgets".

      If you can, spend your young years paying into a more expensive home, even (especially?) at some hardship to yourself. Your future self will have a substantially higher net worth in 10 years when comes time to relocate. Then you can go either to the country, or to an expensive city. But you can pretty much *never* move to the city from the country without starting another deep mortgage later in life.

    17. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by chialea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >Still, as previous news stories here have shown us, married, old staff are not as innovative or useful as young hopefuls, so perhaps this plan isn't so bad on Google's part after all.

      Google is trying to hire PhDs like crazy. These people are not the youngest people around, but they're smart, articulate, self-directed, and self-motivated. I think they're banking on the same things that make people succeed at a PhD being the same things that make people inventive and productive.

      I don't think it's such a bad bet, myself.

      Lea

    18. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends where. In MOST countries in the world this would be more than anyone could ever hope to make without emigrating!! Think about it. Do some research. Don't be so US-centric.

    19. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by kir · · Score: 1

      Still, as previous news stories here have shown us, married, old staff are not as innovative or useful as young hopefuls, so perhaps this plan isn't so bad on Google's part after all.

      Useful is an interesting word to use here. Are you suggesting that somehow a technology company should get rid of their "married, old staff" because they are no longer userful? I would venture to say they would be releasing nearly all of their experience and corporate knowledge.

      Tell AC and ESR that they're useless and no longer innovative. I'm sure they'd agree.

      --
      3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    20. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not necessarily a fallacy. I used to work in Chicago. I had a very small house on a tiny lot. I took a new job in a smaller town. I am a half hour outside Atlanta. My new house is over twice the square footage on a multi-acre lot. It cost over $20K less. My real estate taxes are 30% of what they were.

      You do realize that over time the boundaries of cities grows outward. The $100K house in your scenario would probably be worth $350K in 20 years. You also neglect that some people might prefer to live in a smaller town. Not everyone wants to live in the big city. The whole premise of the article is that people who like the outdoors might be interested in an opportunity like this. You could go mountain biking or hiking close to your house instead of driving a couple of hours.

    21. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um.... You failed reading comprehension didn't you?

    22. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by GorgeMama · · Score: 2, Informative

      Greetings from The Dalles! Just wanted to let you know that here 60,000.00 a year is wonderful! The average home here sells for around 75 to 85,000.00.We are a community of ranch sytle home and small farms and orchards.We are famous for our Cherry industry. We have had 3,000 people out of work since the aluminum industry collasped. We have a lot of educated citizens that don't want to leave our great city. We do have a laid back lifestyle and we love what the gorge has to offer.. We do have our problems like other cities, drugs, ect. but on the whole its a great place to raise a family or to retire. We are an hour and fifteen minutes from Portland and the gorge communities have a lot to offer too. Each has its own unique personality. We have a wonderful Community College that has expanded its role in the community in the last few years. Were so proud that Google chose us.

    23. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      **AVERAGE** That means that 1/2 of their people make more than $60,000/year

      Given your understanding of math, I can guess which 1/2 you would be in.


      I'm sure they have receptionists and janitors making way less

      It is very unlikely that the janitors are google employees which is what they are presumably counting.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    24. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. And I guess we all know which side of the median he's on.

    25. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by ahdeoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In 20 years your $300K home will be worth $150K (and you'll still have $150K to pay for it. So you'll end up having to pay the bank when the government reclaims your property as part of some urban renewal scheme to give a billionaire a new parking lot. My $100K home will be worth $2M and so will the the second home I bought with the extra money I had. I'll have another $300K in the bank from the money I've saved by not paying interest, but by then it'll just barely be enough to put my kids through college.

    26. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by hazem · · Score: 1

      Assume you have 4 people.

      Three of them make $20K/year. The other makes $100K/year.

      Their average salary is (20K + 20K + 20K + 100K)/4 = $40K/year.

      Only one of them makes more than the average, while 3 make less than the average.

    27. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by zojakownith · · Score: 0
      average can actually refer to three seperate figures, mean (what you refer to), median (what your parent refers to) and mode.

      So nybble me was correct in his post.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Average

      --
      I have bad karma....

      Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

    28. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That example doesn't mean that outsourcing isn't good for employees. If a company outsources to the middle of nowhere, that's good for the people in the middle of nowhere. Also it's often the case that houses in quiet rural settings sell for more than houses in the middle of horrible cities, especially with the market for rich people in the city buying holiday homes in the middle of nowhere.

      Secondly, your last paragraph begs the question of whether it's worth sacrificing your youth living in hardship in a smoggy city just to have some meaningless 'net worth' later on.

    29. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by AmigaBen · · Score: 1

      The stupidity in this post runs deep...

      --
      +5 Insightful, really!
    30. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by plalonde2 · · Score: 1
      So say why you think so; that's how debate works.

      I believe in living my life to open up options, not shut them down. The argument that city property drops in value doesn't hold: low-end city property might drop, but middle to high rarely does on the time scale we work in. Those parts of cities have died that way were industrial worker neighbourhoods destroyed by the advent of the automobile and passing of manufacturing jobs.

      So again, tell me why you think high-value enforced savings plans in one's youth are wrong?

    31. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      Why not invest the excess in something other than 'gadgets'?

      I bought my cheap home outright and now, instead of buying gadgets, I save (currently about $50k in stable market investments). Applying this method to your example, in the long run, I come out with the $100k home plus over $200k in liquid investments. You get only the $300k home (having paid interest on your mortgage, losing money, instead of gaining).

      And if you're going to cite tax writeoffs as an incentive for a mortgage, don't. You're writing off taxable income, not tax. People with mortgages make it sound like their magicaly making money, and they're not. The tax writeoff is not worth the interest.

      Perhaps you should mention that your advice may only be sound for the financially undisciplined.

    32. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by plalonde2 · · Score: 1

      I got burned in the stock crash a few years ago; for reasons that aren't entirely rational I seem to trust real estate better than some other investments. And on top of, my local market has interesting constraints leading to a 10 year up-and-up...

    33. Re:$60,000 isn't that much by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      I got burned in the stock crash a few years ago

      I said "stable market investments", not stocks... or stuck funds.

  4. the south by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    All tech houses seem to be in the North...nothing in the south? Why? Will this be called the GooglePlex?

    1. Re:the south by Chatmag · · Score: 2

      According to some folks, the only thing down here in Florida are spammers, which is not accurate.

      While there are a small group of lowlife spammers in Florida, there are also many good Internet related companies, including us. And, we have front row seats for the Shuttle launches :)

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:the south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No tech houses in the south because there they're called "tech trailers."

    3. Re:the south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an office in Santa Monica. This isn't counting the Indian offices either.

    4. Re:the south by porkface · · Score: 1

      It will mostly house clerical staff and will be referred to as the Oogleplex

    5. Re:the south by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      According to some folks, the only thing down here in Florida are spammers, which is not accurate.

      Not to rub it in your face as a non-spamming Floridian- and I do understand that most Floridians are not spammers and use email responsibly- but I had to share an interesting anti-spam idea I once saw in a Bugs Bunny cartoon of all places.
      Bugs was angry that the penalty for shooting a rabbit out of rabbit season was two cents, you see, so he went a little nuts and he started doing some very bad things. One of the things he did was take a saw and physically saw Florida right off along its border so that the entire state floated away to sea, presumably taking a large portion of the world's 180 or so spammers with it and severing their connectivity to the mainland.

      Now I know there are problems with this approach. Here are the appropriate spam-form objections:

      (*) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected
      (*) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it
      (*) The police will not put up with it
      (*) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers

      Specifically, Bugs Bunny's idea fails to account for

      (*) Laws expressly prohibiting it
      (*) Asshats
      (*) Jurisdictional problems

      and the following philosophical objections may also apply:

      (*) Similar ideas are easy to come up with, yet none have ever been shown practical
      (*) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks
      (*) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually

      and especially

      (*) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem

      The idea has additional flaws that aren't on the form. But, it's important to "think outside the box" when attacking a persistent problem like this, and to remember that solutions might be found in unconventional places. Maybe, if we lower the rabbit-season penalty to two cents, some smart rabbit will show up with an idea that actually works!

    6. Re:the south by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, RTP in NC? Home of Red Hat, SAS, an IBM center, and a whole bunch of pharm / bio stuff?

    7. Re:the south by Fanglord · · Score: 1

      Ummm... What Shuttle launches would that be?

  5. Hmm? by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    sports-minded geeks

    Who what now?

    1. Re:Hmm? by Cracell · · Score: 1

      Hey sports are fun, there are more out there then you think.

      --
      Signatures are so 90s
    2. Re:Hmm? by notanatheist · · Score: 1

      Yes, sports minded geeks! Check out my new toy on my site. Indoor bike trainer that interfaces with the PC. Making pain more fun!

    3. Re:Hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When.

      It's been said that the singularity happens when geeks take up sports.

    4. Re:Hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, some of us get mixed up.

    5. Re:Hmm? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yes, geeks participate in sports. Don't be so stereotypical.

      Google is planning going to provide equipment for all the popular sports on the campus: nerf basketball, ping-pong tables, video game consoles, model rockets, and super soakers.

    6. Re:Hmm? by lakeland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've met a couple. They exist. They're a bit weird though... Actually, on second thought, It is more like they're a bit normal. Still, they'd most certainly be classified as geeks by the general population.

      *shrug* It takes all sorts.

    7. Re:Hmm? by pHatidic · · Score: 1

      I have been reading slashdot daily for six or so years and I'm a on the varsity ltwt rowing team at my university. We aren't a slow school either, we will almost certainly medal at Eastern Sprints and the IRA championships. And I'm not one of the slower ones on the team either.

    8. Re:Hmm? by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      Why do you have such bias against slowness? Better not take that attitude to your honeymoon bed or the Missus will be very depressed.

    9. Re:Hmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      and mouse covers for intense porn sessions.

    10. Re:Hmm? by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you pick up towels with great speed.

    11. Re:Hmm? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You forgot "moderating obvious jokes on slashdot as 'Interesting'" in your list of sports.

    12. Re:Hmm? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      My brother and I are sports-minded geeks if you count huntin' and fishin'.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  6. Google building a new complex... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1, Funny
    Will they call it a googleplex?

    Ow, stop throwing things at me!

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Google building a new complex... by game+kid · · Score: 0
      Will they call it a googleplex?

      Since a googolplex is 10^(10^100)--one with a googol of zeros after--it'll be a rather...powerful statement.

      (Very interestingly the googolplex is not recognized by the built-in Google calculator, which "knows" the googol.)
      Ow, stop throwing things at me!

      Ok. (throws a final tomato at Capt. Hector's head as [s]he turns around ;) )

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Google building a new complex... by XorNand · · Score: 5, Informative

      Probably not since that's what they call their existing complex.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    3. Re:Google building a new complex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "googol" is 10^100.
      A "googolplex" is 10^googol.

      It's a number, they thought it would be a clever pun.

      Your friendly Microsoft employee (seriously),
      A

  7. Sports geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Is that some sort of oxymoron? True geeks play video games most of the time.

    1. Re:Sports geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FIFA 2005

    2. Re:Sports geeks? by eqkivaro · · Score: 1

      I was watching ESPN the other day and they referred to NASCAR drivers as "athletes". If drivers are considered athletes, then why not video game players? Just think of all the wrist movement involved ;)

    3. Re:Sports geeks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Pendantic)

      Um, picture playing UT while strapped to a rollercoaster and under heat lamps for about three hours straight.

      Oh, and if you fuck it up; you win a wheelchair or a coffin.

      *grumbles to self about how race car drivers aren't considered "athletes"*

  8. eh? by ImTheDarkcyde · · Score: 3, Funny

    Did i spy geeks and sports in the same sentence?

    Not that we windows users don't enjoy living dangerously.

    1. Re:eh? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did i spy geeks and sports in the same sentence?

      Not that we windows users don't enjoy living dangerously.


      Using Windows isn't sport, it's masochism.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder who you offended to get modded troll, a Windows user, or a Masochist?

    3. Re:eh? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Using Windows isn't sport, it's masochism."

      Unlike installing Linux on a toaster? Pssh. Cast no stones, my friend.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:eh? by Dolda2000 · · Score: 1
      Using Windows isn't sport, it's masochism.
      Or along the lines of alt.religion.emacs -- Using Windows isn't a sin, it's a penance.
    5. Re:eh? by BlastM · · Score: 1
      Using Windows [is] masochism.
      And I'm sure many geeks (myself included) think the same about sport.

      Needless physical exertion? Grown men grappling each other? Pain, sweat and tears? A geek needs not these things.
    6. Re:eh? by squireofgothos · · Score: 1

      In that case I'm a sadist, since I also encourage others to use windows...

      --
      There is no sig...
  9. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no their search results suck

  10. Ideal location for geeks by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    These sorts of locations are ideal for geek workers. If you're running a design or marketing agency, being out of town is going to really hurt your company, but for the sort of people Google hires, this is ideal. Your money goes a lot further out of town, so you can spend more on gadgets, and since they're indoor types anyway, it's ideal. Perhaps more tech companies should be getting out of the smoke and letting their workers live in more idyllic locations. I certainly appreciate being out in the sticks and getting less distractions.

    1. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Problem is if you get fired or, more likely, laid off you are SOL and have to move at a time when you really can't afford it. The way Google's search results currently look this may very well be a possibility in the near future.

    2. Re:Ideal location for geeks by tprox · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This really depends on the age and stage of life of said recruits. I would think, generally, that a younger out-of-college crowd would appreciate being in or near a city. For the older crowd, or those starting families, living out in the sticks as you call it would definitely be less distracting.

    3. Re:Ideal location for geeks by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Moving to some remote location to work for one specific employer, with no other viable employment in the region, sounds like a crazy plan. Once you're there, have a family and some roots, Google has the capability of turning the screws until you bleed.

      There will come a time, possibly in the not so distant future, when Google is Just Another Employee, and they're battling for survival amongst a wide range of contenders to the throne. Suddenly they're not giving out raises, or asking for salary concessions, and the game room and free gym membership are closed down...

    4. Re:Ideal location for geeks by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Money is the key issue. It costs a lot to live in Silicon Valley. In most of the country, $60K is a lot. But it's not enough to afford a decent house within an hour's drive of Google's current headquarters in Mountain View.

      What's really interesting is that they bought the land, presumably with an eye to developing it themselves. Which means yet another attempt to build a geek paradise office building. A risky enterprise -- CEOs such as Phillipe Kahn have lost there jobs over this sort of thing.

    5. Re:Ideal location for geeks by ces · · Score: 1

      I agree that this is perhaps not a bad idea for tech companies.

      I also believe Oregon has some major incentives for tech companies to locate in economicly depressed areas (pretty much anywhere outside of the Portland area). For example Symantech has most of their IT staff in Springfield, OR.

      There are some advantages for the employees too beyond the outdoor recreation opportunities, namely: lower cost of living, less traffic/shorter commutes, and far lower housing prices. (if you make $60K/year you can afford a nice house in the Dalles. In San Jose, Seattle, or even Portland you can't really afford a house on $60K/year, forget getting a nice one)

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    6. Re:Ideal location for geeks by hkb · · Score: 1

      Your money goes a lot further out of town, so you can spend more on gadgets, and since they're indoor types anyway, it's ideal.

      Uhm, since places like The Dalles aren't bristling with Best Buys and Fry's (which would charge the same price they charge anywhere else), people tend to order stuff online, where it's the same price everywhere.

      --
      /* Moderating all non-anonymous trolls up since 2004 */
    7. Re:Ideal location for geeks by shystershep · · Score: 2

      Yes, but since you're spending less on rent/mortgage, groceries, transportation, etc., there is more of the green stuff to throw at the gadgets.

      --
      The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    8. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the Parent poster lives in his mom's basement, he isn't "dialed in" to things like mortgages and grocery costs.

    9. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually - I prefer to work in sillicon valley rather than in the middle of nowhere like I am now. Need a RS232 or RJ-45 connector? that's 5 days to get the stupid part. Need to go to Frys to look what's new? that's a day drive to the nearest store in Ca - and that's still in the boonies, with crapola new gadgets.

      Plus it's freaking freazing cold, crapola pizza joints, etc etc...

    10. Re:Ideal location for geeks by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " CEOs such as Phillipe Kahn have lost there jobs over this sort of thing."

      Show up in Oregon with a California license plate and you may lose more than your job. Change plates at the state line and lose the accent, a few teeth and put on a plaid shirt, real quick like.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    11. Re:Ideal location for geeks by sampowers · · Score: 1

      No joke.

      My mother moved to Oregon from California before I was born. She used to tell me this story about when she was driving up into Oregon, some geezer saw her California license plate and tried to run her off the road!

      Stuff like that's not so bad these days, but a lot of older Oregonians are fiercely protective of their culture and lifestyle.

    12. Re:Ideal location for geeks by DrCode · · Score: 1

      You have a point. OTOH, Portland, and lots of other higher-cost places, haven't had a lot of viable high-tech employment in the last few years. At least if you're in the Dalles, you (hopefully) won't need as much money to subsist on.

    13. Re:Ideal location for geeks by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      You're kidding. Who wants to live in the middle of the fucking woods? For many people it's nice to be able to easily drive to an area with outdoor sports (which is true in the Bay Area), but most people wouldn't want to fucking live there.

      For all the people who talk about how great it is, only meth addicts and those to stupid and poor immigrants who can't get a better job actually live in rural areas.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    14. Re:Ideal location for geeks by syukton · · Score: 1

      Also more green stuff to throw at the green stuff the northwest is often known for, if you catch my drift.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    15. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, sorry, but groceries tend to cost the same wherever you go, with some exceptions on certain products. You're not going to magically see a cheaper grocery bill because you moved to the sticks; in fact, it may go up some because there's less savings through economies of scale.

      Transportation is debatable. Since you'll probably be driving farther to live in the sticks, your fuel costs will go up significantly. However, your insurance costs may go down, although this is completely dependant on how much insurance costs are for the specific state and region, and can vary wildly. Of course, if you were comparing transportation costs to someplace like NYC, it's far more expensive to live in the sticks because it's only $17/week for a subway pass in NYC, and you don't have to own a car at all.

    16. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      For all the people who talk about how great it is, only meth addicts and those to stupid and poor immigrants who can't get a better job actually live in rural areas.

      Shhhh.... These companies might figure out they can just move their offices out to the sticks, get immigrants to move out there with them and be their employees, and the rest of us will just be out of jobs.

    17. Re:Ideal location for geeks by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This really depends on the age and stage of life of said recruits. I would think, generally, that a younger out-of-college crowd would appreciate being in or near a city. For the older crowd, or those starting families, living out in the sticks as you call it would definitely be less distracting.

      This is a pretty important distinction I think. If you're single, and hope to ever change that status, the last place you want to live is out in the sticks. You have to live around other people (i.e., in a city) in order to find dates, unless you don't mind dating uneducated rednecks, which probably isn't appealing to the kind of employee Google is looking for.

  11. Google moves to The Dalles by mctk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Locals wonder about "internet" phenomenon.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    1. Re:Google moves to The Dalles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't expect to make much money at the Dalles facility. The reason companies like Google move to economically depressed or undeveloped places is that they can offer a salary that is within range of the local salary. So rather than making your $80k Bay Area salary at Google, they'll be paying you a $40k salary.

      Just because the average google salary is twice as much as the average salary in the Dalles doesn't mean that the average google salary IN THE DALLES will be twice as much.

  12. Expect more of this by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is going to be The Next Big Thing. Such "Rural Sourcing" has been going on somewhat quietly for a while now and is giving offshoring your workforce a serious run for its money.

    There's even a company named (imagine that) "Rural Sourcing, Inc." that is consulting companies on how they can open up call centers, technology centers, etc. in economically depressed or extremely rural areas of the U.S.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know if investing in The Dalles area would really qualify as Rural Outsourcing. In any case though, $60K is probably still a lot of money if you compare to places like India and China. Is it not a little weird that companies like Google and Skype are not moving all their operations overseas? The nature of their businesses makes it really easy to operate from any location in the globe. It should be much harder for a manufacturing shop to move overseas because of all the logistics involved. If this is indeed the case though, why do we still see companies like Google and Skype operating from Europe an USA when it would be much cheaper to do so from elsewhere? Maybe their decisions could point to some pitfalls of the outsourcing model.

    2. Re:Expect more of this by Jemima's+Witness · · Score: 1

      I really don't see why this isn't more popular already. I mean, you'd have to make more than double to live comparitively in San Francisco as you would in rural Oregon. What's the difference? A few high speed lines, and what else do you need for a software/tech company? Hell try comparing Winnipeg to Toronto. I don't see the benefits of having a company located in a major urban centre.

    3. Re:Expect more of this by 0ptimus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the benefit of companies operating in major urban areas is fairly obvious: their employees want things to do besides work [gasp]. I'm not sure about you, but if all I had to do after work and on the weekends is stare at some cows wandering by, I'd get pretty bored and my work would certainly suffer because of it.

      Urban areas attract better talent because the employee actually likes being there. Also, because there is a larger pool of talent in urban areas, it is significantly easier to recruit new talent to your company. If one person decides to leave, there is a whole pool of people in the area with similar talents and skills.

    4. Re:Expect more of this by iamlucky13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      While I guess what you're saying is true, it has always puzzled me. Then again, I left a very rural area to go to a school twice the size of my hometown (2500 students). I guess the environment breeds different sets of interests. I for one don't find wandering aimlessly around downtown at all interesting. The theatres here are all owned by the same poorly operated company (Regal), you have pay most stores just to use their parking lots, and there's no place to mountain bike. The only real advantage I've experienced so far is that Portland has a pretty well organized adult rec soccer league. Well, plus I get a pretty good laugh from city people joking about cow tipping. What a bunch of uneducated concrete-dwellers.

    5. Re:Expect more of this by bunnyman · · Score: 1

      More proof that google is becoming evil.

    6. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! How did you create that? Just through the map software or is there something niftier going on? (i.e. an understanding of the url format)

    7. Re:Expect more of this by bunnyman · · Score: 1
    8. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very simple: one has a better chance of getting laid in an urban environment than in a rural one.

      No, I'm not being a troll and I'm not trying to be funny. As a 31 year-old male living in San Francisco, there are just simply eligible people out there who are also looking to get laid than in the small 1,200 person town I grew up in. No way I'd move out into a remote area like that, unless Google wants to start up a intra-company speed dating group or something.

    9. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bangaloregon?

    10. Re:Expect more of this by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I've always found it a little ironic that the important areas of the tech boom were all located in the most expensive real estate in the country while the premise of the tech bubble was that you would be able to do anything from anywhere.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    11. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, that come a holiday weekend (or, really, any friday night in PDX), the highways are clogged with city people getting away from city life, if only for a day or three.

      If PDX is such a vibrant, freaky-cool place to live, why the need to get away from it?

      Oh well. At least it's better living 50 miles from PDX than living in Sea-Tac-Bel-Oly-Evt area.

    12. Re:Expect more of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is really really nifty. Thanks!! :)

      Curious: How did you figure it out?

  13. 45 minutes?!? by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you drive 120 miles an hour, maybe. It's at mile marker 82 or so. Do the math.

    1. Re:45 minutes?!? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you drive 120 miles an hour, maybe. It's at mile marker 82 or so. Do the math.

      Okay...

      82 miles take 41 minutes to make at 120mph. Driving at 109mph will get you there in 45 minutes.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      yeah, no kidding . . . from yahoo maps:
      Starting from: Portland, OR
      Arriving at: The Dalles, OR
      Distance: 83.6 miles
      Travel Time: ~1 hour 27 mins

      sure, it's a scenic drive, but not what one would call convenient for commuting.
    3. Re:45 minutes?!? by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since we're being pedantic...that only gets you to the exit. You still need a few minutes to get to the actual location. :-)

    4. Re:45 minutes?!? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Dalles is about 1.25 hours from downtown Portland, I know a lot of people that commute an hour or more up here in Seattle. If you live in the burbs, it's closer. But if I worked in The Dalles, I'd live nearby. Also, The Dalles is not Bumfuck Nowhere, it's a very nice little town near Bonneville Dam, some spectacular vistas in the Columbia River Gorge, and is becoming quite "gentrified" with rich yuppies who are bailing out of the city. It's a two Starbucks town...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    5. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and Hanford is nearby as well.

    6. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      My parents live near The Dalles. I went to high school in The Dalles. The Dalles is an economically depressed shithole. However, it is close to good skiing, hiking, mountain biking, and - of course - sail boarding. Hood River is also nearby, which is a much nicer place to live.

    7. Re:45 minutes?!? by fatcow · · Score: 1, Funny

      My thoughts, exactly

      Why, let's ask GOOGLE!

    8. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's a two Starbucks town...

      Is it a town because of Starbucks or are there Starbucks because it's a town?

    9. Re:45 minutes?!? by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1

      there are plenty of ppl in the portland metro area who have long commutes, its life - you'll just have to deal with it. it could be worse, you could be driving down to salem (the capital).

    10. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly, what does the convert to in horses?

    11. Re:45 minutes?!? by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1
      It's a two Starbucks town...

      Is it a town because of Starbucks or are there Starbucks because it's a town?

      no its a two Starbucks town because its in oregon. remember if you search for the amount of starbucks retail stores in portland (with in 10 mi) on starbucks' site you'll get 115 results (and granted not all of them are in portland but most of them are). you might also want to know that starbucks started in seattle (three hours from portland if you're going the speed limit, but i've made it in two) and there are hundreds of non-Starbucks coffee shops in portland (and a rather healthy population of Starbucks haters too)

    12. Re:45 minutes?!? by ethx1 · · Score: 1

      It's a two Starbucks town

      Is that a big deal? I live on a 2 starbuscks street. One with a drive thru!!

    13. Re:45 minutes?!? by baomike · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would call it a little nearer The Dalles dam than Bonneville. You may be thinking of Cascade Locks or Hood River.

      The Dalles is NOT Portland, it's where the Aluminum smelter is. Weather is diff, it's east of
      the moutains, colder, windier, DRYER, etc...
      for more on weather see:
      http://www.ocs.oregonstate.edu/index.html

      Better like rocks and dry grass. If you like wind surfing and snow skiing you are in pretty good shape. Be aware that the gorge in winter can be impassable.

      PS the town is called THE DALLES. Makes for strange road signs, ie "DOWNTOWN THE DALLES"," CITY OF THE DALLES"

    14. Re:45 minutes?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right.

      It's 173 miles, according to Google maps. I5 between Seattle and Portland has heavy traffic, not to mention is positively crawling with state cops.

      There is no fucking way you drove 85 miles per hour AVERAGE for two hours.

      Maybe you drove from North Portland to SeaTac in two hours, but downtown to downtown? No way.

    15. Re:45 minutes?!? by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, up in the PacNW, they have much better coffee alternatives. This is basically like saying it's a two-McDonald's town.

    16. Re:45 minutes?!? by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      When I lived in Prtland, I'd drive up to Seattle/Redmond quite frequently to visit, but I never really felt that I'd really want to live there. I liked being a few hours away. On the other hand, you're right, The Dalles is different. If I were working there, I'd try to live nearby, and I don't mean the east side of Portland, either :)

      Sometimes, driving further east, late at night on the main road towards the Pendleton/Walla Walla area, I'd see what looked like little puffs of cotton floating across the roads. I started driving a lot slower (with nobody else in sight) once I realized they were field mice! And then I was slow enough to see foxes and other animals, too. Great night sky viewing, too, if you're into astronomy. People who think Eastern Oregon and Washington are barren empty places, outside of the few cities, just don't know what they're talking about.

    17. Re:45 minutes?!? by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 1

      And my personal favorite, "West The Dalles" (I think it's the exit with the salmon art on the railings).

    18. Re:45 minutes?!? by Snwbeast · · Score: 1

      1.25 hours? Not the way the idiots in this area drive. Get ready to go 40 mph the whole way because the guy in the left lane won't be able to figure out how to pass and get out of the way. I've travelled quite a bit for work and I can say with certainty, the worst drivers on the planet drive in the Portland area. Sure, Boston is aggressive, LA has bad traffic, but the people here just don't understand how to drive a car.

  14. Am I the only one who thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Google search results really suck right now? What the hell happened to them?

    1. Re:Am I the only one who thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People learned how to game their system. It's like why microsoft has all the spyware.

      I'm sure that google has been working very hard to come up with better methods, and when they're finished touching it up they'll roll it out.

    2. Re:Am I the only one who thinks by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it was a result of Google Hacking?
      They may not want to be seen as the exploration tool of choice.

  15. why? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    With all the outdoor sports (windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing) in the area, sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility

    The Yahoo story I read (several days ago) said that maybe 100 jobs would be created. Not a lot, folks...and that's 100 jobs total. Not "100 techie jobs"...100 -jobs-.

    Those jobs won't be doing sexy things. The only reason you put a facility in the middle of nowhere is because it's cheap in terms of space. Skilled labor is virtually nonexistant and relocation expensive.

    Google strikes me as being like the Army. They talk a great talk(in Google's case, innovation, exciting workplace, etc; in the Army's, it's "defending freedom" and "jobs skills") and show you eye candy galore, and when you actually get in, you spend your time wading in shit (metaphorically in Google's case).

    Nevermind the locals are going to hate you because you're making twice what they are and you're "some city kid", etc. Experience has told me, "trickle down" is never popular until you forcibly remind people (for example, I've heard of companies exchanging cash to silver dollars for employees to use in the local town, to demonstrate to the community just how much of their income comes from employees).

    No thanks, I'll pass.

    1. Re:why? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Those jobs won't be doing sexy things. The only reason you put a facility in the middle of nowhere is because it's cheap in terms of space. Skilled labor is virtually nonexistant and relocation expensive... ... Nevermind the locals are going to hate you because you're making twice what they are and you're "some city kid", etc.

      Portland is full of skilled labor, and from the Portland burbs, The Dalles is very commutable. The quality of life in The Dalles is quite high as more and more yuppies bail out of Portland for more rural and livable areas. The Dalles is not the same town it was 20 years ago. Also, Oregonians are much more progressive than you seem to imply. You've never been here, I cam tell.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:why? by ewolfr · · Score: 1

      The only real tech company in Ashland is ProjectA , the cost of housing is out of control as a lot of Californians have moved there and jacked up the prices (over 400k last I heard). You are still going to have to commute at least a short distance unless you make huge jack.

  16. Tired: Outsourcing Wired: Insourcing by imperious_rex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just more proof of an under-reported trend in IT: insourcing. Google gets cheap(er) labor AND avoids bad PR from outsourcing to some foreign locale known for cheap labor. $60k annual for IT work is almost a joke in the Bay Area, but it's Big Bux in rural areas like the Dalles (Hell, even I don't make that much. Hmmmmmm...maybe I should consider getting a job there, despite my aversion to rural living)

  17. Hopefully desks, not servers by afabbro · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Putting lots of people in the Dalles makes sense. Putting lots of computer doesn't. Let's see:
    • In the Columbia river flood plain
    • In an earthquake zone
    • Not far from the Umatilla chemical weapons depot
    • And the big one: we're overdue for the every-300-year Cascadian subduction zone tsunami event, which will roll right up the Columbia river. And there are dams both West and East of the Dalles...

    I'm just saying...not where I'd put a data center. Many of the major data centers in Portland have moved elsewhere in the last 20 years for reasons such as this. (Yes, there are still some around...I work at one).

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by Xzzy · · Score: 1

      > I'm just saying...not where I'd put a data center.

      Well look where they built silicon valley. ;)

      Your argument is likely falling on deaf ears.

    2. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by shine-shine · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Putting lots of people in the Dalles makes sense. Putting lots of computer doesn't.

      It's good to know what we value most.

    3. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by chronos · · Score: 1

      It is very clear that you have no idea where the Dalles actually is. The Umatilla arms depot is about 130 miles to the east. Given that the winds tend to come from the west and the distance this would be more of a problem for Hermiston or Pendleton. The region around Pendleton is far more economically depressed than the Dalles ever dreamed of being.

      Normally I would assume that you have never set foot in the state of Oregon but it is just possible that you do live and work in the Portland area. For some reason most people in the Willamette valley have a huge blind spot where any thing east of the Cascades is concerned.

    4. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      In the Columbia river flood plain

      And it's flooded how many times in the last 50 years? The dams to more than gennerate power.
      In an earthquake zone

      Much less then LA or the Bay area.
      Not far from the Umatilla chemical weapons depot

      Ummm.. yea. Like 120 miles from it. This is quite a stretch.
      And the big one: we're overdue for the every-300-year Cascadian subduction zone tsunami event, which will roll right up the Columbia river. And there are dams both West and East of the Dalles...

      I highly doubt that any tsunami, even one 10 times the strength of the recent Indian Ocean tsunami could go that far up the Columbia. The Dalles is 160-180 miles up river from the Pacific Ocean. It'd have to make a right angle turn to the south at Longview, a right angle turn to the east at Portland, and then funnel up the fairly narrow gorge past Cascade Locks and Hood River. This is fiction. I'd imagine that Salem would be at a greater risk of tsunami then The Dalles.
    5. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 1

      >> Putting lots of people in the Dalles makes sense. Putting lots of computer doesn't.
      > It's good to know what we value most.


      People can get out of the way of danger. Computers in a data center can't.

      --
      The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    6. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by T-Ranger · · Score: 1

      Not far from the Umatilla chemical weapons depot
      I knew google was using some advanced technology, but biological computers?

    7. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by hyfe · · Score: 1
      And the big one: we're overdue for the every-300-year Cascadian subduction zone tsunami event, which will roll right up the Columbia river. And there are dams both West and East of the Dalles...

      You do know that every-300-year catastrophes actually don't happen every 300 years right? :)

      Real logic would indicate that the longer since the last catastrophe, the lesser the chance of it happening .. else Norway would be in for one heeell of a heat-spell next summer

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    8. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      And quite possibly downwind from Mt. St. Helens' next big blowoff. It's dome-building again, ya know...

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    9. Re:Hopefully desks, not servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      # In the Columbia river flood plain
      The Columbia is big enough to not flood. Even in 1980, after Mt. St. Helens dumped a bunch of ash and mud in it, it was hard for shippers, but didn't really cause flooding downriver from the Cowlitz and Toutle River junctions.

      # In an earthquake zone
      Not like the Bay Area, right?

      # Not far from the Umatilla chemical weapons depot

      At least 100 miles away from it, and they're getting rid of the stored chemical weapons there.
      But I lived within 50 miles of the San Onofre nuclear power plant in San Diego, so I fail to see the point anyways.

      # And the big one: we're overdue for the every-300-year Cascadian subduction zone tsunami event, which will roll right up the Columbia river.

      Right. Lessee... The Dalles is upriver of a couple of big dams. Even a 100' water surge at Astoria will not affect much upriver of the Bonneville Dam. The tsunami potential is really a big issue for coastal communities like Lincoln City, Astoria, etc. Oh, Astoria is about 90 miles or so, as the river flows, from Portland. That's a LONG way for a water surge to travel, because it's going to be losing a lot of energy fighting the water flowing downstream as well.

      # And there are dams both West and East of the Dalles...

      Your point is? There are also at least 3 active volcanoes within 100 miles of The Dalles. So? You're more likely to die in a car accident.

      Do stay away, Chicken Little.

  18. Additional information for slashdotters by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 4, Informative

    We're all conservative rednecks out here and it's always windy, and we get snowstorms and ice storms.

    1. Re:Additional information for slashdotters by Rev.LoveJoy · · Score: 1
      Why is this moderated as funny? It's totally true. Not that *I* have any problem with conservative rednecks. This whole state (OR) is peopled with them with the exceptions of Portland and Eugene...


      - RLJ

    2. Re:Additional information for slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, they are telling the truth. It's a nice area geographically, very windy, gets most of the snow that lower elevations in Oregon see, and is rather conservative.

    3. Re:Additional information for slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, it's not the South (i.e., Georgia outside of Atlanta). There are a lot of hicks, but no different than Eastern Washington, Idaho, Wyoming, eastern Colorado, etc.

      Fear of things not rural goes a long ways politically in every state.

  19. $$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by reporter · · Score: 3, Informative
    The principal reason that Google's management is building a technology center in Oregon is that building and running such a center in Oregon is cheaper than building and running such a center in Silicon Valley. Similar reasoning applies for why the management chose an economically depressed city in Oregon.

    Even now, taxes in California are high, and so is the price of property. Why else would management explicitly build a technology center far away from an elite university like Stanford University or UC-Berkeley?

    If more companies would do what Google is doing, then the Californian government will start to lower taxes and to limit the number of legal/illegal immigrants flooding into the state. The latter is the cause of the high prices of apartments and residential homes.

    $200,000 gets you an excellent, spacious house in most places in Oregon or Texas. That same $200,000 gets you, barely, a small noisy condominium in Silicon Valley.

  20. I grew up in The Dalles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The Dalles is a depressed area that suffers from a heavy criminal activities. Meth labs are common place in the area and meth junkies are prevalent everywhere. The drug has reached epidemic proportions there and I'm amazed google hasn't taken that into considering when deciding where the facility should be located.

    Hopefully any geeks that decide to move there are well armed incase of any incidents.

    1. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0

      First of all, these days you can find meth labs just about anywhere. But in general, your characterization of The Dalles is bullshit, so much so in fact that I can tell you have never been there. I think you are thinking about some of the shit-holes in Washington and Oregon, like Wenatchee. The Dalles has been steadily moving in the yuppie direction for the last 15 years or so.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity- why would Google consider whether there are Meth labs or no Meth labs in a city when looking to open a branch office? Do you think they are worried all their employees will start doing Meth?

    3. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats how Google comes up with all their wacky ideas.

    4. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by HardwareLust · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, no, he's pretty much got it right on the spot. I stopped there while on vacation last year, and found pretty much the entire town dirty, run down and generally depressing. We didn't stay long, and I wouldn't go back there voluntarily, unless it was just to pass through at freeway speed. The words 'a depressing shithole' spring to mind.

      One of my best friends is from there and grew up there in the 80's and early 90's, and has never once had anything good to say about the place, and is very glad he's not there anymore.

      I'm sure Google is just looking at their bottom line, as far as the cost of NW real estate is concerned. If anyone from the company actually spent some time there, they would probably beat feet in the other direction back towards PDX as fast as they could go. I know I would!

      --
      ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
    5. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most high school kids would describe where they live as 'a depressing shitholes'. That's the way teenagers are. It does not say much about the town, since most teenagers wish to flee their depressing lives for the "excitement" of The City.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    6. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by rs79 · · Score: 1

      " Meth labs are common place in the area and meth junkies are prevalent everywhere. The drug has reached epidemic proportions there and I'm amazed google hasn't taken that into considering when deciding where the facility should be located."

      What makes you think they haven't? Think of it not as crystal meth think of it as a "productivity enhancing suppliment". Work with me here on this ok?

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    7. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      they'll just side-strafe any attacks ;)

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    8. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Extra long workhours, reduced food consumption (fewer free Google lunches) - everyone wins!

    9. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by HardwareLust · · Score: 1

      True enough. But, once they get old enough, I think most peeps realize it wasn't nearly as bad as they thought. Neither him nor I have reached this point yet, and high school is a fairly dim memory for both of us.

      It may very well be that it's not such a bad little town overall, but my first impression was shockingly bad, and life's way too short to give places like that a second chance. Besides, there's a gazillion other small towns in the NW, and The Dalles is only one of them, and fairly unremarkable one at that. Meth users are so common anymore in the poor and middle-class parts of the NW, it's hardly even worth mentioning. It's just expected.

      --
      ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
    10. Re:I grew up in The Dalles by putko · · Score: 1

      Can anywhere really have a worse meth problme than Spokane (aka Spo-can't)?

      Let's see how this experiment works for Google. I'm betting they are simply not used to the cheap but crappy services that prevail outside of Silicon Valley! Incompetence is the norm.

      E.g. ISP cuts you off for a whole weekend.

      Maybe you get an "Oooops" or a "sorry" -- but it could easily happen again next weekend.

      People are smarter in The Valley. Standards are higher. People out here won't even call you back. They don't want to make money. Hence, "Spo-can't".

      If only The Valley wasn't so expensive, crowded, ugly, grimey and crimey, and if CA had a better tax/liability system.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  21. Oregon = The Anti-Microsoft by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is anyone else noticing an interesting trend here as far as company location goes? Though Oregon already has a ton of high-tech companies(including Intel R&D), this is the second major Microsoft competitor to set up shop there in a year(the first being the OSDL). As an Oregonian I certainly welcome this, though I'm starting to wonder if I should get a bomb shelter should MS want to obliterate the competition in more ways than one.

    1. Re:Oregon = The Anti-Microsoft by Slackrat · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, Google did just open a research lab in Seattle.

    2. Re:Oregon = The Anti-Microsoft by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not in Seattle, it's in Kirkland. Microsoft is Redmond, and so is Nintendo. Real and Amazon are in Seattle (as is the Omni Group). Mind you, Redmond and Kirkland are adjaent to each other on the east side of Lake Washington, and Seattle's just on the west side of the lake. Getting to the east side (from downtown/uptown Seattle) takes about 45 minutes during rush hour and 15-20 minutes every other time of day. Meanwhile, the guys from Delicious Monster just sit in a coffee shop here in Seattle.

      --
      No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    3. Re:Oregon = The Anti-Microsoft by hyfe · · Score: 1
      As an Oregonian I certainly welcome this, though I'm starting to wonder if I should get a bomb shelter should MS want to obliterate the competition in more ways than one.

      Axes of evil, say welcome to Oregon; your newest member!

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  22. Silicon Valley Part Deux? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When many of the pioneers of "the Valley" first set up shop, they were building on cheap farmland far away from the sky-high rents of San Francisco, and even Palo Alto. Look at a map of a place like Cupertino in the 60s...you will be blown away...nothing but farms. Some tech companies looked for cheap digs...and look at things now.

  23. one catch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You have to float your wagon down the Columbia and avoid the rocks.

    1. Re:one catch by iLL_L0gic · · Score: 1

      hahaha, man, I still play that game to this day! What a classic. *opens Apple IIe emulator* "ahhhh"

  24. It's a lot cheaper there.. by EvilStein · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Google, based in Mountain View, California, is expected to pay $1.87 million for the parcel of industrial-zoned land 85 miles east of Portland, with an option to buy three other area sites."

    Dude, around here, (Mountain View) 1.87 million will get you diddly squat. 1.87 million for 30 acres near Portland, OR isn't all that bad. That's a beautiful area, not far from Portland or the PDX airport (lots of flights to Seattle and down here to the Silicon Valley every day) and Portland also has a lot of young professional types.

    Not a bad move overall. :)

    1. Re:It's a lot cheaper there.. by baomike · · Score: 1

      only one problem , The Dalles isn't near Portland.
      except in the sense that Barcelona is near Paris.
      You don't commute from The Dalles to Portland. (well there are mashochist...)

    2. Re:It's a lot cheaper there.. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      The Dalles is well within commuting dist. from many of Portland's burbs. From Gresham, it's a little under an hour. The "Barcelona is near Paris" thing is way off. And, up here in Seattle, many people do commute an hour or more (one way) every day. My guess is that down in California where these people come from, such commutes are normal.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  25. Re:Are trees at stake? by SerialHistorian · · Score: 2, Informative

    Um. Obviously you've never been there, but I still don't understand why you posted that. There really aren't that many trees in The Dalles. It's mostly prarie-type high plateu... halfway between grassland and desert, and very dry.

    --

    --
    Vote for your hopes, not for your fears - Vote Third Party

  26. and then you'll realize by climbing_monkey · · Score: 0, Troll

    and after all of you sports minded geeks flock to portland you'll realize that there arn't an people of color, but then again, it is the nw and ya know, oregon is the northern hot bed for neo-nazi's and the KKK so why would people of color exactly want to live in portland (hell, thats one of the reasons i moved my ass out of there this past june).
    but rest assured, you'll have plenty of organic food, clean water, the wonderful dirty willamette river (well not if you live in the dalles but if you're in pdx then you're fine), and rain to your disposal. have fun!

    1. Re:and then you'll realize by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1
      whome ever modded me troll,
      have you ever actually been to portland for more than a few days and didn't go to just NE. cause if you haven't you have no busness modding me troll. After spending 17 years of my young life living in SW portland (well actually mt. park lake oswego, but i was less than 5 min out walking distance and went to portland public schools) i can tell you, it is not a friendly place for people of color. my freshman and sophmore years in high school i went to wilson, a school of 1,600 students and we had under 50 students that were people of color (really, i should say they didn't pass for white). oh and then there is that whole neo-nazi skinhead part; read the book A Hundred Little Hitlers and you'll see just how far the racism has gone. i moved to brooklyn this past june and live with some friends of mine (yes, i'm 17, yes its a very stable living situation, and yes my mom approves - she knew that i couldn't live in portland any more). and now, after moving over 3,000 mi. away i can finally begin to work on my internalized racism which was probably made worse because i grew up in portland. i have had one teacher in portland who was a person of color in the 5 schools that i went to (i went to two high schools, one middle school, and two elementry schoos). so next time you try to talk about how poc (people of color) friendly portland is try and check with someone who lived there and is a poc first, you may just hear a diffrence in oppinion.

      and if i spelled anything wrong in here i really don't give a shit - you'll all live.

    2. Re:and then you'll realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny thing is, just about every city in the US their residents say the same thing.

      At least you did not grow up in Cincinnati, OH.

      Good luck in Brooklyn.

      You probably know what it feels like to be in The South if you're a "yankee". Having lived in Georgia for 6 months, about the only areas that "feel" like other urban areas are the surburban/urban interface areas in Atlanta.

      Yes, Portland Public Schools are fucked up, though, but so are most other big city school systems.

  27. what about kiteboarding? by quakemeister · · Score: 1

    windsurfing is so 80's.

  28. I find that hard to believe by Zoc_All_Alone · · Score: 1

    No, I know for a fact they aren't going to build a Google complex in The Dalles.

    How? I asked Google Maps

    :P

  29. What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Joe+Tennies · · Score: 1

    I would assume you don't consider Texas part of the south than. There are probably as many tech companies there as the Silicon Valley.

    Also RedHat and Epic Megagames are in N.C. Tiberon (makers of Madden Football for EA) is in Florida. There's definitely some.

    1. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Also RedHat and Epic Megagames are in N.C. Tiberon (makers of Madden Football for EA) is in Florida. There's definitely some.

      Oohhh, Epic Megagames... that brings up memories. Didn't we all just love jazz jackrabbit and extreme pinball ? :-)

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Texas is considered to be in the midwest. I know this because I live in South Carolina, which is part of the south, ask a southerner about texas. They react nearly has appaled as they do about california.

      There are no major tech companies in the south because of two things:

      1. There are no major tech schools, as such there is no major talent pool to draw from.

      2. There is no need. Since there are no major tech schools or major tech companies the need for tech people and tech companies is minimal. Hence the market demand isnt there and there is not company that will move into an area where it is likely to fail.

      Its getting better in some places. North Carolina has a fairly large amount of tech people and tech companies and atlanta is coming along nicely as well (do believe they have a google center IIRC) but generally places like Myrtle Beach, Wilmington, Savannah, Nashville, Mobile etc etc just dont have the market to support it. Not size really ... consumer demand combined with available resources like major bandwidth and tech people to fill needs.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    3. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      Jazz is always the first thing I think of upon hearing Epic Megagames. It's amazing how something you love as a kid can shape the reactions you have to certain phrases

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    4. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by thedustbustr · · Score: 1

      Speaking of jazz, have you ever gotten it to work on windows xp?

      --
      This sig is false.
    5. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What the hell are you talking about? There's several tech schools in the South: Virginia Tech, Clemson, Georgia Tech. VT and GT and two of the highest-ranked. Plus there's lots of other very large universities in the South: Univ. of Virginia, FSU, Auburn, Univ. of Tennessee, etc.

      As for what Southerners think of various states, lots of Southerners don't even think Virginia is in the South, even though it was the capital of the Confederacy. Idiots.

      So yes, there is a very large talent pool to draw from in the South. However, most people leave the South as soon as they finish their degrees, heading for greener pastures in the northeast, California, Texas, etc. Of course, this is mostly because that's where all the good jobs are. This gets back to your point #2; companies don't want to move someplace where they're likely to fail.

      Now, the real reasons why both employees and companies don't want to stay in the South are very debatable. Maybe it's a chicken-and-egg scenario. Are companies staying away because the employees don't want to live there? Or are employees just moving to where the companies happen to be currently located?

      Personally, I graduated from Virginia Tech, which is located in the mountains of southwest Virginia. I stayed there for 2.5 years after I graduated, working in a couple of local jobs, before I took a job with a megacorp in Arizona. I thought I'd like living someplace where the cost of living was lower (as my salary was also quite low, which they tried to justify with the low CoL), there was no traffic, etc. I rapidly grew to absolutely hate the area. For one thing, it wasn't the same living in a neighboring small town as it was living in Blacksburg and going to school there (I couldn't stay in Blacksburg proper because my salary was low, justified by the low CoL, but the housing prices in the town were very high). There were many reasons. Traffic was a big one: even though there weren't many cars, all the roads were 1-lane windy mountain roads, so you couldn't go anywhere without getting stuck behind some slow-ass, making your trip take literally twice the time. And if you tried to get around at any speed, you had to constantly watch for overzealous cops eager to give out speeding tickets for exceeding the extremely low speed limits. Big-city driving isn't like that: everyone drives fast, there's many lanes, and cops are busy stopping real crimes instead of harassing motorists. Another reason was just the type of people living in that area: everyone is dirt poor, has no education, etc. There's an overriding backwoods mindset to everyone you come in contact with. Lastly, there's nothing to do there: there was one dinky mall with crappy overpriced shops, one huge wal-mart, a few other standard big-box stores, and that was about it. No specialty stores, no diversity, etc. Don't forget a lack of access to services like cable internet.

      If the people in the South want to know the real reason why tech companies and tech employees don't want to live there, personally I think they should look at themselves and their neighbors; most of us just don't want to live in that environment.

    6. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by sv0f · · Score: 1

      Just pickin' nits.

      Texas is considered to be in the midwest. I know this because I live in South Carolina, which is part of the south, ask a southerner about texas.

      I grew up in Illinois and lived for 14 years in Nashville. IMO, Texas is not part of the Midwest or the South. It is a world unto itself...

      1. There are no major tech schools, as such there is no major talent pool to draw from.

      Well there is Georgia Tech...

      [...] generally places like Myrtle Beach, Wilmington, Savannah, Nashville, Mobile etc etc just dont have the market to support it.

      As far as Nashville goes, you're right. There's no interesting computer tech going on there. Even Vanderbilt University folded its computer science department back into its electrical engineering department a few years back -- an unheard of occurrence!

    7. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by VikingDBA · · Score: 1

      Texas is not considered to be in the Midwest. At least not as far as Texans are concerned. The midwest is north of here. Texas is a southern state but your right in that we are not a part of 'The South' as such. Perhaps the SouthWest would be more accurate, but probably not. Texas is really just Texas.

    8. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      I can sum this up in about 12 words: You're an idiot. (repeat 4 times)

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    9. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      I would agree that Virginia is not a southern style state, I have friends that live there ... they act more like north easterners than southerners. Who was fighting on what side of the war doesnt mean squat, its a culture thing. Although generally the division is how certain culture differences came about ... its not the only reason.

      That being said GT is not a great tech school, although as I pointed out atlanta has a solid tech community. Clemson is certainly not a tech oriented school, I live within reasonable driving distance and know a few students. Nothing in the south compares to stanford, MIT, Berkley etc etc. Thats the major difference as far as schools, there are very few major comp-sci research schools.

      "most people leave the South as soon as they finish their degrees, heading for greener pastures in the northeast, California, Texas, etc. Of course, this is mostly because that's where all the good jobs are."

      The coastal carolinas, atlanta, nashville ... they are some of the fastest growing markets in the country. Generally I see your point, nobody wants to live in clemson or rural virginia or georgia.

      "they should look at themselves and their neighbors; most of us just don't want to live in that environment."

      Sorry but your dead wrong. The south in general has some very nice areas. Where I live in Charleston its nice. Very nice. Kick ass weather, culture, style and its generally one of the more beautiful places (for people AND places) that I have ever been. Sure it doesnt have all the fringe benefits of a place like SanFran or NYC but I also can find a nice place within walking range of the beach for 1k/month. Places like atlanta, charlotte , raliegh etc are all very nice, and they are growing which means that oppourtunities abound.

      There are places that are hick and rural no matter where you live. New York, California, Florida, Texas. They all have those type of places. We simply dont have a very dense population in this country outside of the north east and the south cali area.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    10. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      "IMO, Texas is not part of the Midwest or the South. It is a world unto itself..." I agree with you and I think about 46% of the company agree's with us.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    11. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by patman600 · · Score: 1
      Texas is considered to be in the midwest. I know this because I live in South Carolina
      If anything, Texas is part of the southwest, I know this because I live in Texas, and have for my entire life.

      Really though, as another poster said, Texas is it's own region. It's certainly big enough, and it is diverse enough that it doesn't fit entirely within either the south or southwest (and not really at all in the midwest). And Texans (at least me), having a strong state identity and very proud of fighting for our own independence and being our own country, prefer to be their own region anyway, rather than being lumped in with other, lesser states ;-)
    12. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charleston is an awesome town. I lived there for a couple years when I was in the Navy. I had to move away when the naval base was closed.

    13. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know how the US got Texas, don't you? After Mexico kicked our butts at the Alamo, they forced us to take it. Someday we should send a few marine divisions down to Mexico city and give it back. :)

    14. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Actually most people iin the South don't mind claimin Texas as a southern state. They have the same attiude about guns as we do.

      Georgia Tech is home to the internet hub for this region of the country. They used to be able to use the spare bandwidth but got that pulled when people started abusing it. (KaZaA anyone?)

    15. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many tech companies in South Florida. I'm sure most have heard of Citrix? A lot of other Latin american focused companies are also located here. My company is based in Boca Raton near the old IBM blue lake campus. Many tech companies populate this area and the area is still growing.

    16. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      And here Up Nort in the upper midwest (Minnesota), most people think of any state south of Iowa as redneck-land. Never mind that they're themselves rednecks...

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    17. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by ahdeoz · · Score: 1

      There isn't even a Devry Institute anywhere near Seattle. North Carolina has "Research Triangle" and that name's been around longer than Redhat or Microsoft. Texas is only "not apart of the South" because Texas is as big as all the rest of the South combined. Living in South Carolina doesn't make you an authority on the south, it only gives you an excuse when you sound stupid.

    18. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Yep. Not too hard, you have to run some sort of patch on it. I saw it a little while ago when I was trying to play the game but I got bored of it fast :-( (Keep in mind I was like, eight when Jazz was a fun game ;-)) Umm, a quick google search yields this. Good luck :-)

    19. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Your state gave us W. I could lump you in with the states from eastern europe and you still would be the lowest ranked state. Cede from the union already would ya.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    20. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Have you EVER in your life traveled ? Been outside your shit ass town ? I would guess not. The point is that what defines a region is culture, the culture in texas is nothing like the south. Period.

      Who the fuck said anything about seattle you jackass ? Since you brought it up ... there is an ITT tech campus in seattle. There is also the main campus for UW. There are over 15 different schools in the seattle area. There are also a ton of other schools in the surrounding area's. Its because of this combined with the rapid growth in the area during the 80's and 90's that many major tech companies have offices in the region, quite a few of which are their main offices.

      Using your logic New York and Pennsylvania are not part of the north-east because they are as big as the rest of the northeast combined. Moron.

      Devry ... WTF ????

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    21. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by patman600 · · Score: 1

      W isn't a texan, he's from Connecticut. And besides, we just wanted to get rid of him. It's not our fault the rest of the US was stupid enough to take him.

    22. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      Somebody should tell W that. He seems to think he is a texan.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    23. Re:What about Texas? (Re:the south) by tsrich · · Score: 1

      "That being said GT is not a great tech school, although as I pointed out atlanta has a solid tech community."

      What basis do you have for this statement? I'm definitely biased ('92 Ga Tech grad), but you're just insane.

      Tech consistently ranks in the top 20 in the nation for technical majors. US News and World Reports recent rankings had Tech as:
      * No. 9 public university in the country
      * No. 5 graduate engineering college
      * No. 5 undergraduate engineering college
      * No. 1 industrial engineering program
      * 9 undergraduate engineering programs ranked in the top 10
      * 7 graduate engineering programs ranked in the top 10

      And for those who think there are no tech jobs in the South, I work here in Research Triangle Park in Raleigh, NC. Over 38,000 other science and engineering types work within the boundaries of RTP, and the greater Triangle area probably has several times that number of tech workers as well.

      Although not as well known, Atlanta also has a thriving tech job market.

      -Tim

      --
      Tim
  30. Little-known irrelevant fact by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Dalles was a point along the oregon trail.

    CmdrTaco has cholera.

    Found 32 pounds of food.

    You broke a wagon tongue.

    Ah, those were the good old days.

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Little-known irrelevant fact by doormat · · Score: 1

      Damnit, where are my mod points. Thats the first thing I thought when I saw "The Dalles". Playing Oregon Trail in elementary school.. so fun...

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
  31. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that depends if you think $60k is a lot of money or not! Personally, I don't. You could get around 3 times that sum working for an investment bank, doing largely similar work, and you would get to live in a cool city like NYC or London.

  32. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, and their free email doesn't have enough capacity

  33. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about the web sites of some recruiters? I'll take that coin...

  34. Re:Give me a job! by climbing_monkey · · Score: 1

    yeah but $60k doesn't go nearly as far in NYC than it does in portland - the land of no sales tax (god do i miss it)

  35. oxymoron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sport-minded geeks?!? wtf?

  36. Re:Are trees at stake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that they bought property next to the defunct aluminum plant. There are no trees and a while back the port authority prepared the area for industrial use.

  37. Very common occurence nationwide. by jwcorder · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The call center I work for is in a rural area of less then 20,000 people. There are three types of jobs in this town. The educated work here. The uneducated work at a Tyson Food processing plant. The rest work in retail such as restaurants and grocery stores that the other two groups keep open.

    I live in a 4 bedroom house on 7 acres 15 mins from my job and the payment is 650 a month.

    Of course the DSL is about 400kb down on a good day.

    The problem with this is that the town growns so dependent on the two industries here that when trends cause employee moves, have the town goes belly up. The whole company used to be here but then they moved our merchandising and logistics departments to a new complex in the nearest big city and about half of this town has shutdown. Not to mention you are an hour away from any real forms of entertainment or good shopping.

    This is positive as it's cheap, beautiful, and quiet.

    It's negative because it's quiet, less technologically advanced, small town minded.

    /My 2 cents.

    --
    http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Very common occurence nationwide. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, my 2 bedroom apt goes for $900 a month. Can we switch? :)

  38. To get to The Dalles by Kilroy+Wasn't+Here · · Score: 1

    Do I still have to raft up the Columbia River, or have they opened the newfangled "toll road" yet?

  39. Welcome to The Dalles, Sanjeet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure Rick Cooper of the NSV will welcome you with open arms to our close-knit community.

  40. Thank you by Sanity · · Score: 1

    Finally someone said it and managed to do so without getting modded as flamebait or trolling.

  41. Great! by HardwareLust · · Score: 1

    Now there's *two* employers in The Dalles, Wal Mart and Google. Could there possibly be two more diametrically opposed businesses in one small town?

    Talk about your 'have's' and 'have nots'... Now we'll have a textbook example to follow along with.

    --
    ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
    1. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am proud to say as someone who grew up in The Dalles OR, and is currently out of state for college, we DO NOT have a Wal-Mart - and we are better off for it. The nearby town of Hood River, where the windsurfers and yuppies live, has the only Wal-Mart within 60 miles.

      To be honest though - there aren't many big employers left here, the three big things in The Dalles used to be the hydroelectric damn on the Columbia, the Aluminum processing plant, and the Cherry-Orchards.

      The aluminum plant shut down for the second (likely final) time a few years ago, and the cherry growers are finding more and more competition from elsewhere, some have begun mulling around the idea of diversifying into other fruits, in case Cherries become too difficult to make a profit in. The damn is still here thank goodness, but it only employs so many people.

      AND NO WALMART - THANK GOODNESS!

    2. Re:Great! by HardwareLust · · Score: 1

      Well, that's nice to hear that there's one small town left that hasn't been destroyed by a Wal Mart.

      'course, now it's just a matter of time before they move in there so they can fleece all the fine Google employees.

      --
      ...not that I'm a pirate.. Hell I've never even fired a cannon. - oldwolf13
  42. What are these "outdoor sports" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    I'm not sure I understand this concept of "outdoor" actually. I tried looking for the IETF RFC on "outdoor sports" and came up blank. Can someone help me?


    - Typical Slashdot Reader

  43. About that link to Yahoo Maps ... by ClassicPenguino · · Score: 1

    On the TheDallas page the article refers to, they have a link to a Yahoo Maps map of the area. I'm fairly certain they meant to link to Google Maps instead.

  44. Re:Give me a job! by Cromac · · Score: 1

    Better a sales tax than an income tax, especially if you're making a good wage.

  45. Proximity to Cal, Stanford overrated by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    Many of these Valley firms are hiring developers from the east coast, IIT (India) and universities in Russia and China. The proximity to Stanford and Cal is not relevant anymore. In fact I might say it is even irrelevant. These universities have moved on to biotech and to a lesser extent nanotech anyway as "big idea" fields.

  46. Hanford Too! by feyhunde · · Score: 1

    Hanford Nuclear, where uranium becomes weapons grade plutonium, is not too far from The Dalles either. So when the earthquake comes, it will 1. Cause the dams to brake, which will create a flood, which will let free the nuclear materials and the gas. Of course, The Dalles is upwind. Chicago and Idaho and such are downwind....

    --
    I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    1. Re:Hanford Too! by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      Hanford Nuclear, where uranium becomes weapons grade plutonium, is not too far from The Dalles either. So when the earthquake comes, it will 1. Cause the dams to brake, which will create a flood, which will let free the nuclear materials and the gas. Of course, The Dalles is upwind. Chicago and Idaho and such are downwind....

      Most of the current contaminants at Hanford are liquid/sludge. So they will go *with* the flood.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  47. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by cot · · Score: 3, Informative

    "the number of legal/illegal immigrants flooding into the state. The latter is the cause of the high prices of apartments and residential homes."

    Say what now?

    What fraction of the homes in california are populated by illegal immigrants? Now, what fraction of the NICE houses? Do you think that most illegal immigrants are taking high paying jobs and moving to Los Altos and Palo Alto and driving up the cost of property? You really think they're having such a dominant effect on the market, or are you just scapegoating?

    I'm all for creating and enforcing reasonable immigration laws rather than the current don't as/don't tell open border situation, but someone's gotta pick the lettuce and I'm quite sure that nobody posting here is doing it.

    --

  48. The Trail by Apreche · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Oregon Trail The Dalles was the place where you got to control the raft going down the river. Everybody always chose that option. You were just dumb if you took the Barlow Toll Road. Looks like Google didn't crash into any rocks.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  49. Strawman Arguments: Mod Parent Down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The grandparent post said "legal/illegal immigrants". You proceeded to assume that the grandparent was referring to "illegal immigrants" buying lavish houses.

    You deliberately tried to troll or to create flamebait.

    Many legal immigrants are flooding the housing market. Due to strong demand, the prices are skyhigh.

    Now, as for the lettuces, if the borders are shut tight, the wages in the unskilled labor market will skyrocket. Plenty of Americans will want to pick lettuces, tomatoes, etc.

  50. solitude by LordMyren · · Score: 1

    you can find and afford solitude. thats the benefit of the boondocks, its something which is just not possible in the city. cost of living and all that, meh, details compared to a lifestyle.

    i think we're slashdotting the google map servers with The Dalles, Oregon on them. in other news, my first official complaint about the google map server is there's no scale. LAME.

    driving directions are 82 miles, which is a little over comfortably close enough range to portland, particularly when route 84 is about to get a heckuva lot busier. on the plus side you should be pretty far out of the city lights effect.

    my real question is what is the primary focus of this location? just another datacenter, or some R&D too?

  51. Economics of Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It is really funny to see people who hold advanced degrees in engineering or mathematics but who pretend to feign ignorance about how economics works. There is NO shortage of labor in the farming sector. Kick out the illegal aliens, and wages will rise dramatically. They will rise high enough to attract Americans to pick the vegetables.

    People who are deceptive in this way are usually liberal f*ckwads or Chinese bastards or Indian jerks. Only these kinds of people say that if there were no illegal immigrants, then the entire American population will starve because no one is picking the vegetables.

    1. Re:Economics of Bigotry by cot · · Score: 2, Informative

      "if there were no illegal immigrants, then the entire American population will starve because no one is picking the vegetables."

      This is most certainly not true, but I would think that due to the higher wages required to pay American workers, the cost of food would rise and our overall standard of living would drop.

      I have no idea how significant the effect would be just for illegal immigrants into california, but if we decided to stop using any labor from other countries with lower standards of living in areas like manufacturing, we'd see a pretty drastic effect.

      But I guess it's cool to have some Asians in a sweatshop someplace far away making our jeans and sneakers, but can't they find a way for Mexicans to work the fields without coming into our country?

      --

    2. Re:Economics of Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got to be kidding me if you think that the powers that be will ever kick out all of the illegal immigrants. It's the next best thing to slavery, as far as the well-to-do are concerned.

    3. Re:Economics of Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll argue that our standard of living would become more realistic.

      We Americans long ago forgot what our lifestyle is based upon, a lot of someone else's blood and sweat, so we can sit in our air conditioned cubicles and worry about esoteric shit (Linux vs. Windows is esoteric), and dream of one day getting enough cash to live yet another higher "lifestyle" than we currently have.

      Sure, I'm just like everyone else. It would be nice to drive that black MB 55SL-AMG to work. It would be even cooler to pay cash for it, or better, have the company I'm the CxO or Sr VP pay for it. But it ain't gonna happen.

      Not everyone can just say "fuck it, let's move the 'country' and be farmers". But a few do. So be realistic. Realize that all that nice microfiber stuff comes from the petrochemical industry. Not all of it comes from domestic sources.

      Also realize that, in the grand scheme of things, complaining about "Real Fur == Murder!" is about as illogical of an argument as you can get. You give money to the Humane Society, no?

      Enjoy the urban/suburban high-tech lifestyle. Just be aware of it all. And realize that your lifestyle is not possible to have without all the hicks, rednecks, loggers, ranchers, farmers, and other urban untermenschen who help make the urban existance possible.

      They're (almost 'we' now...) are the ones who get up at 4am because they have 1000 acres of land to work before it rains in a day or two. They're the ones who help make toilet paper possible. They're the ones running cows through the milking parlor. Twice a day (4am/4pm), rain or shine.

      The PBR was fun to go to in PDX. If you want to really make people snap their necks, wear cowboy boots and a cowboy hat and walk through Pioneer Courthouse Square at lunch time.

      BTW, Portland is *WAY* more normal than Eugene.

  52. What good are all of those outdoor activities... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    ...if you don't get to take advantage of them b/c you are working 70 hour weeks?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  53. Re:Why is Google so important? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Christ here we go with the typical /. attack on all those who have the gall to succeed.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  54. AC Strawman Arguments: Mod Parent Down! by cot · · Score: 1

    I picked up on the inclusion of illegal immigrants as it was to me the objectionable part of the parent post. Did he say "legal/illegal" and really just mean legal? If not, then I'm assuming that he was arguing that illegal aliens are a non negligible part of the problem, and the direction of my response to that part of the post is sensible.

    The issue of legal immigrants is a whole other can of worms for many reasons, not the least of which is the typical types of jobs affected is entirely different.

    --

  55. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you can't buy any real estate for $200k in silicon valley. period.

  56. Re:Are trees at stake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful with that knee!

    Theat area isn't heavily forested, more like open grassland.

  57. yeah by idlake · · Score: 1

    With all the outdoor sports (windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing) in the area, sports-minded geeks should be flocking to apply for a job at the new facility

    All two of them ;-)

    1. Re:yeah by baomike · · Score: 1

      Mountain biking in that area (The Dalles) sounds grim.
      Lots of lava, hitting that stuff at any speed and you'll need a new epidermus. It's sort of like coarse crushed glass. Road rash on steriods.

  58. Typical Liberal Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is most certainly not true, but I would think that due to the higher wages required to pay American workers, the cost of food would rise and our overall standard of living would drop.

    Typical liberal bigotry.

    Here we have a liberal f*ckwad who says that higher wages for farm workers means a lower standard of living for the rest of America. B*llsh|t. Higher wages for the farm help mean that they can now pay medical insurance on their own instead of getting free medical care that bankrupts the hospitals in Southern California.

    Another angle here is that the liberal f*ckwad wants to have poor people in the world. The f*ckwad says that we need to have poor, desperate people in the world so that we Americans can live well.

    Mainstream Americans say that we can still live comfortably even if there are no desperate, poor people in this world.

    1. Re:Typical Liberal Bigotry by cot · · Score: 1

      "Another angle here is that the liberal f*ckwad wants to have poor people in the world. The f*ckwad says that we need to have poor, desperate people in the world so that we Americans can live well.

      Mainstream Americans say that we can still live comfortably even if there are no desperate, poor people in this world."

      I accept the fact that my lifestyle as it is depends on the fact that there are poor people in the world, and by poor I mean poorer than me. Apparently you (and you claim mainstream america) can't accept that. Am I happy that there are poor people? No.

      Is it possible that technology will continue to improve and the standards of living of people across the globe can be improved to match ours? Sure, why not. But given the way that a typical country is going to do its best to improve things for its own population relative to the rest of the world, it's hard to imagine that there won't always be inequities, and that coutries won't always leverage those to their own citizens' advantage.

      Also, what's with all the swearing?

      --

    2. Re:Typical Liberal Bigotry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I accept the fact that my lifestyle as it is depends on the fact that there are poor people in the world, and by poor I mean poorer than me. Apparently you (and you claim mainstream america) can't accept that. Am I happy that there are poor people? No.

      Liberal f*ckwad is also a liar. He just said that wants an economic system where desperately poor people will be glad to work for $2 / hour, picking vegetables. Now, the f*ckwad says that he is not happy about the presence of poor people.

      By "poor", this f*ckwad is referring to desperately poor -- like the Mexicans with no education, no hope of any kind, and desperate to work for $2 / hour in the USA. This f*ckwad wants to maintain an economic system in the USA that depends on desperately poor people. Are you folks out there repulsed by this f*ckwad?

      That goes to show why a liberal f*ckwad is a f*ckwad. This guy is a troll. Mod him down!

  59. It's a big, big world.. by floridagators1 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why do they have to build a center so close to that cursed state of Washington, where you know who develops you know what.

    1. Re:It's a big, big world.. by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Because they need a jumping off point for the counter-invasion.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  60. Mod Parent Down! It's a Troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Mod this damn parent down. It is a troll.

    The troll writes: " I picked up on the inclusion of illegal immigrants as it was to me the objectionable part of the parent post. ".

    I don't get it. The original article clearly used "illegal" to refer to apartment rents. Most illegal aliens rent apartments. They are creating huge demand for housing.

    You, Mr. Troll, then claimed that the original writer was saying that illegal aliens were purchasing mansions. You are deliberately trolling. It is quite clear that the original writer was clear on what s/he meant.

    Then, you, Mr. Troll claim that illegal aliens have no impact on the housing market because they all just sleep in the fields or the streets.

    You, however, are creating FUD and should be modded down as such.

  61. Re:Give me a job! by Doppler00 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come to California! We got both!

  62. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Try these or these or here


    Even a brief trawl searching for C++/Sybase shows one offering £700/day which equates to about £170000 before tax (around $200000 US) Admittedly you need some experience, but not much.

  63. Consider cost of living by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

    The cost of living in The Dalles, Oregon is MUCH lowre than the cost of living in Silicon Valley or Silicon Forrest.

  64. Re:Mod Parent Down! It's a Troll. by cot · · Score: 1

    "Then, you, Mr. Troll claim that illegal aliens have no impact on the housing market because they all just sleep in the fields or the streets."

    I didn't claim they had NO impact on real estate in California. I, as 1 single homeowner, have an impact on real estate in California. I had issues with the original poster's claim

    "The latter (legal/illegal aliens) is the cause of the high prices of apartments and residential homes."

    Not part of the cause, THE cause. That's a load, particularly for illegals. Their impact is only going to be felt on the lowest end of the shittiest apartments. Are you bummed about the high prices of shithole apartments in east san jose?

    Weirdest use of "FUD" I've seen in a while, but then again I don't read this site often.

    --

  65. "Sports-minded geeks" is an oxymoron by melted · · Score: 0, Troll

    Kind of like "unbiased slashdot discussion" or "Microsoft-loving slashdotter".

  66. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

    Don't get out to California much, eh? ;)

    There hasn't been a tiny, noisy 1BR condo for sale in Silicon Valley for less than about $350k for at least 5 years. Even then it's slim pickins.

    Sigh.

    Me, I'd take rural oregon any day if I could just move my job up there. Real purty.

  67. Geek girls named "Debbie" by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    Seriously, someone has to make a movie called "Debbie does Dalles".

    1. Re:Geek girls named "Debbie" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "Dalles", it's The Dalles. Remember that.

  68. Mod Parent Down! It's a Troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Their impact is only going to be felt on the lowest end of the shittiest apartments.

    I suppose that congratulations are in order for me. I actually got a troll to admit that illegal aliens impact the price of apartment rent.

    Any reasonable person can reasonably parse this sentence: "The latter (legal/illegal aliens) is the cause of the high prices of apartments and residential homes."

    You, Mr. Troll, cannot because you are trolling. It is clear that "legal immigrants" refer to residential homes and both "legal immigrants" and "illegal immigrants" refer to apartments.

    Mr. Troll then constructs a strawman argument by tying "illegal immigrant" and "residential homes". This is the typical behavior of a troll. The troll should be modded down.

  69. Ashland, Oregon, anyone? by DavidNWelton · · Score: 1

    The gorge is a nice area, but it's warmer down south, and I really like Ashland. It feels vaguely European in that it's small with a nice, well looked after (and, dare I say "vibrant") downtown. It's also got all the outdoor stuff - cycling, skiing, rafting and so on. Wonder what the high tech scene is like there. It's one of the areas I'd consider if I moved back to the states, although the "problem" right now would be my fiancee`, who is in biotech, which seems to go a lot more by clusters than IT does. Bay Area, San Diego, Boston... And I don't want to go back to the bay...

  70. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by burns210 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well Oregon, though some don't know it, is extremely well engineered for anything networking related. We have a lot of fiber laid down, designed for redundant links to the 'major' cities throughout the state, so for Google, there is a lot of bandwidth they can tap into, without having to worry about digging holes.

  71. Could be much worse by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'll take Oregon over Mumbai, India. At least they're staying domestic.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:Could be much worse by farnz · · Score: 1

      Google's list of addresses is going to upset you then. They've already got tech centres in Bangalore and Hyderabad; presumably they didn't want to add Mumbai to the list.

  72. The Dalles? by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1

    Was Chimney Rock already rented out? What about Snake River? Stupid Oregon Trail :)

    1. Re:The Dalles? by Shadowlore · · Score: 1

      What about Snake River?

      Actually we already have a lot of tech company work here. HP, Agilent, Micron, and so on.

      --
      My Suburban burns less gasoline than your Prius.
  73. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If more companies would do what Google is doing, then the Californian government will start to lower taxes and to limit the number of legal/illegal immigrants flooding into the state. The latter is the cause of the high prices of apartments and residential homes.

    Most Google employees are immigrants. Luckily, Google's immigration lawyers help them deal with all the visa crap. Making it even harder to get qualified employees is the last thing Google needs.

  74. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit your whining. Do you actually know anything about the real estate market here in the Valley? There are many 2BR/1BA condos for less than $300k. And they're not in bad neighborhoods and near railroad tracks, etc.

    Hell, a coworker bought a 2BR/1BA ~800sqft condo in downtown Saratoga for $350k.

  75. Sportminded Geeks by [cx] · · Score: 0

    Kind of like study curious jocks.

  76. Ob Simpsons by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Oooh they got the internet on computers now.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  77. That's about right ... by jstockdale · · Score: 1

    Most of the Google people are from California after all ;)

    120 on a open highway isn't that far off.

    -S ...

    --
    **AA: a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes
  78. is fuckedgoogle.com the anti-slashdot ? by googisgod · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.fuckedgoogle.com/

    In Slashdot's eyes Google can do no wrong,
    and in Fuckedgoogle's eyes Google is going down the well-worn path of dot.com excess and hubris.

    Somewhere in the middle is the truth. But fuckedgoogle is a hell of a lot funnier. :)

    1. Re:is fuckedgoogle.com the anti-slashdot ? by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

      I don't know who the hell always mods you up, but god damn your sing-song is getting tired.

      Give it a rest bud.

  79. time to try fuckedgoogle.com? (a real site) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    http://www.fuckedgoogle.com/

    Granted, they are just as one-sided about Google as Slashdot is, except in the OTHER direction. Funny shiat.

  80. Lots of solitude by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    The Dalles, Oregon, is not really all that attractive of a place to live. It has more than its share of meth tweekers, gun freaks, and broke-ass rednecks. It can be a miserable little place. There is nothing near it except Portland. The nearest Fry's Electronics is 90 miles away to the West.

    It is right on the geographic change line between the green and wet Pacific Northwest zone and the vast American 'empty quarter' that extends about 800 miles to the East, and to the South, and to the North.

    The drive to Portland is quite beautiful through the Columbia River Gorge. And there are two exquisite mountains nearby; Mt. Hood and Mt. Adams.

    Still, Google might have difficulty getting people to stay in The Dalles, OR.

  81. Lafayette, Louisiana by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

    school wise it's probably one of the biggest tech centers in Louisiana. Not great compared to some northern states, but they were one of the few to compete in that final robotics thing for the defense department.

    there are other little spurts of growth that take care of us southern geeks as well, you just have to hunt harder =)

    1. Re:Lafayette, Louisiana by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      What schools are there ? LSU ? LTech ?

      Never been to Louisiana, and dont know anybody from there.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  82. Not a troll, reality by baomike · · Score: 1

    Portland and southern Oregon are not/ were not friendly places for non whites. Portland at one time
    had a particularly bad reputation. May still have,
    ( I am a whitey).

    As for The Dalles I don't know.

  83. Good Stuff ! ! ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothin worth talkin about in Soho.

    But here, you'd be just down river from
    the Umatilla Chemical Weapons Depot and
    the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

    We're talking lifetime tech. employment.
    Albeit, a slighly short lifetime.....

  84. I wish that I'd applied, for sure, now by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

    They're going to find The Dalles to be very pretty. When I lived in Portland, doing engineering work for an ISP, I took several weekend trips to Eastern Oregon, driving through this area. I remember wishing they had some sort of substantial industry there that I knew something about, so I could move there and watch the salmon go up the river, hike around in the hills, etc.

    You can still see wagon trails faintly on some of the hills nearby, out there, remnants of "the" Oregon Trail. Seems very appropriate that Google is physically returning to the frontier. I expect them to be much better stewards of the land than the industries of the last century, too.

    *sigh* I wonder if it's too late to try to apply :)

  85. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by PureFiction · · Score: 1

    The low lending rates for mortguages are causing the majority of price inflation for property. How many homeowners do you know of that refinanced or traded up over the last few years?

    The housing market is going through a similar kind of inflated bubble that the stocks went through. The only thing we don't know is what the crash is going to look like. A small downhil slide for a number of years or a stomach churning drop in valuations over the spans of a few months? :)

  86. No big deal by agusus · · Score: 1

    Google is opening offices in lots of places. Maybe we should have a slashdot story for each one!

    This Oregon facility will only appeal to a niche market (and will only be 50-100 jobs they say).
    Outdoors activities are great, but people will go to the Redmond office if they want that.

    Young people like to live in, or near, major cities. It's exciting, there are more things to do. Since Google is mostly young people (median age under 30 I think), they won't have droves going to work in Oregon, even given the lower cost of living. Those types of things appeal to older employees with families.

    That said, since in 10 years Google will have a lot more older employees with families, having this office may help later.

  87. Re:Are trees at stake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey Dumbass - ever been there?! No trees to speak of around the Dales.

  88. Except that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The continents continue to move, or at least try. Something's got to give at some point. Maybe not every 300 years on the button, but a lot of geologic events do tend to exhibit periodicity. In tectonics especially, the question is rarely "if"; it's usually "when."

    Your real logic is interesting, but luckily other people are studying the actual processes involved in these things. So at least someone understands the difference between climate and faulting.

    1. Re:Except that by afabbro · · Score: 1
      The Cascadian subduction fault is *extremely* periodic...it's about 300-325 years, and the last one was ~1700. Geologists have taken cores kilometers down and find the same pattern...a layer of sea mud every 300-325 years.

      I hope Google bought flood insurance ;)

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:Except that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that suggest that whatever was causing the periodic fault tsunamis stopped? One thousand seven hundred years is a long time for an event that is supposed to periodically happen every 300-325.

    3. Re:Except that by PixelThis · · Score: 1

      He's saying that the last tsunami happened around the year 1700, not that it happened 1700 years ago.

  89. Googleplex by ats-tech · · Score: 1

    Registrant:
    Google Inc. (DOM-335099)
    1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 US

    Domain Name: googleplex.com


    Hmmm, could be.

  90. Don't forget by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    And if a flood, earthquake, chemical spill or tsunami doesn't kill off the computers, Moore's law will in about two years. *shudder*

  91. I know someone by Whatsmynickname · · Score: 1

    I'm all for creating and enforcing reasonable immigration laws rather than the current don't as/don't tell open border situation, but someone's gotta pick the lettuce and I'm quite sure that nobody posting here is doing it.

    My brother-in-law (ex) who lives in SoCal mowed grass for a living for a local gov't agency. He got laid off 6 months ago, and has been unsuccessful getting another mowing job, despite the large demand for landscaping there. So there you go, a white person looking for a job "noone else wants to do". Bull-fucking-shit.

    Want to know why "noone wants to do it"? They don't want to get paid below minimum wage with no benefits and say "Thank you sir, may I have some more work...", that's why...

    Those "jobs noone else wants to do", such as landscaping, are often run by some well-off person (usually white) who then hires a bunch of sub-minimum wage illegals for more profit for him (her).

    The irony of this is when liberals mandate minimum wage and a ton of other labor laws, they ensure illegal alien labor will be used instead. THAT's why "no one else wants to do it..."

  92. State of Minnesota embraces this policy by legal_asshole · · Score: 1
    In Minnesota, they passed a law that provides for tax-free zones for business that open/move to economically depressed areas (obviously a HUGE over simplification of the law).

    It's pretty genious from a policy standpoint actually. Wouldn't you love to not have to pay state business income taxes?

  93. Oregon is skateboarding mecca by SethJohnson · · Score: 1



    windsurfing, hiking, mountain biking, skiing

    Uhhh.. You forgot skateboarding. Oregon has the best public skateparks in the world. Hands-down.

    Seth

  94. Funny how QUEST (QSFT) is full of old farts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real funny how Quest Software mostly keep the old farts and people with just newly borns, as if they are sensitive to families and people with commitments. All singles or people that were not married or just with girl friends, they got the boot. Maybe some manager read some book saying "staff with families are better complient workers" while the singles are rebellious out of control needy freaks.

    Look, no ones gona run a 747 every day with no downtimes and engine checks, it'll over heat and crash, so people must be treated the same way, stick to 40hrs/week, give them downtime brain time.

  95. Texas has thousands of tech companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [ 1lus10n wrote:] 1. There are no major tech schools, as such there is no major talent pool to draw from.


    Actually, that's not true.

    In Austin are Dell Computer, Metrowerks, Motorola. In Dallas, you have Id Software (makers of Doom) and Texas Instruments, which make calculators. Compaq (until HP bought it) was a big company in Houston.

    Rice University and the University of Texas at Austin produces a lot of engineers, and so does (surprisingly) Texas A&M, which counts among its faculty Bjarne Stroustrup, the creator of C++.

    Here's an article I found at http://www.tucsoncitizen.com/index.php?page=busine ss&story_id=020205a1_austinmain



    HIGH-TECH BLUEPRINT: Austin, Texas

    Austin, Texas, college town and state capital, can teach Tucson a lot about creating a vibrant, 21st-century economy.

    By TEYA VITU
    Tucson Citizen


    San Diego and Boston, like Austin in the Texas hill and lake country.

    Why?

    Because high-tech means high-paying jobs and a growing economy.

    How did Austin, that sleepy college town, become a high-tech darling, often called "Silicon Hills"?

    As recently as 1980, Austin and Tucson had uncanny similarities: smallish metro areas nearly identical in size, liberal bastions in strongly conservative states, university dominated, unnotable economies.

    Then in 1983, Austin started to shed its national anonymity and capture the attention of America's major cities. A decade later, Austin and a handful of other cities landed on the cover of Newsweek magazine under the label "high-tech hotbeds."

    Now Austin's more than 2,200 high-tech companies employ about 95,000 of Austin's 700,000 strong work force.

    Tucson has about 1,200 high-tech companies employing 50,000 people, according to the Southern Arizona Tech Council.

    The Old Pueblo is in the second fastest growing state in the union, but metro Austin has boomed to 1.4 million people while Tucson's fast growth has reached only 900,000. In 1970, Tucson had a slightly larger population than Austin.

    Austin's vaunted status is built upon two high-tech consortiums that chose to locate there in the 1980s after highly publicized nationwide searches involving all the major high-tech cities.

    The Microelectronic and Computer Technology Corp. looked at 57 cities before selecting Austin as site of the first high-tech consortium in 1983. Dell Inc. started in 1984 and Sematech, an 11-company semiconductor research consortium, picked that city after considering proposals from 33 states.

    Before then, Tracor, IBM and Texas Instruments put Austin on the high-tech path in the 1950s and 1960s. Samsung, Motorola, Advanced Micro Devices and three division headquarters for 3M came later with about 2,200 smaller high-tech companies.

    MCC and Sematech spun off dozens of companies and attracted hundreds of high-techs to Austin.

    Dozens and dozens of cities across America have sent people to learn the quirky city's secrets. Tucson's economic development community takes note of Austin's achievements, too.

    "One of the things Austin has done is they have made a long-term commitment for the private and public sector to put in the infrastructure for education and research to make sure to build a top-quality product," said Steve Weathers, chief executive at the Greater Tucson Economic Council.
  96. Overrated??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [Ars-Fartsica:] any of these Valley firms are hiring developers from the east coast, IIT (India) and universities in Russia and China. The proximity to Stanford and Cal is not relevant anymore. In fact I might say it is even irrelevant. These universities have moved on to biotech and to a lesser extent nanotech anyway as "big idea" fields.


    Did you read this: http://www.epinions.com/content_73675148932?
  97. Google = Umbrella Corporation by jaegerx21 · · Score: 1

    This it the remote isolate lab where they will begin working on the T-virus and regenerating human life. Of course this will create man eating zombies and we'll be forced to defend ourselves. I'm stock piling water/guns and wolf brand chili right now. I'll be ready!

  98. Same in DC... sprawl! by aquarian · · Score: 1

    The same thing happened in DC. All the government contractors and tech companies moved into the farmland along what is now the Dulles corridor, resulting in the worst sprawl in America. All the disadvantages of city life with none of the advantages. I wouldn't wish it on anyone. I hope Portland is able to control this.

  99. Equally exciting and relevant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Taco Bell opened in Navasota, TX. Who cares.

  100. Re:Give me a job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, in Oregon, income tax is about 3%, and you deduct it off your federal income tax.

    Everywhere I've lived with a sales tax (WA, CA, IL. CA and IL also had income tax), the sales tax was at least 8%. Sales tax was over 10% in Cook County, IL, and 12% in Chicago...

    It didn't take much to make it worth the 3 hr drive from Seattle to Oregon to buy stuff, and have the savings in sales tax pay for the motel room for an overnite stay.

    I'll take Oregon's income tax with a smile. About the only other states, tax-wise, to want to live in would be Nevada and Wyoming.

    The funny thing is, Oregonians have NOT A FUCKING CLUE what high taxes are. They bitch and moan about the small amount of taxes they do pay like stuck pigs.

    On the flip side, our school district has a 4-day school week, in large part because of state's lack of (ability to provide) funding for K-12 education.

  101. People of color? by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    ...so Oregonians are transparent? I'm kind of pinkish myself.

    Are brown, black, and yellow such horrible words?

  102. Re:Are trees at stake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other notable thing is that The Dalles is regularly one of the hottest cities in the state (often tying with the distant Medford). There is a federal hydropower dam in town, which might get a workout from the airconditioners.

    Go a few more miles east and you get into sage brush though.

  103. A trend we might be seeing more of... by Skim123 · · Score: 1
    From what I've read/heard on the radio, many businesses are planning on either leaving California, expanding outside of the state's borders, or are not planning on opening any new facilities within the state, due largely to the state's high taxes, business-unfriendly worker's compensation laws, and socialist-minded legislature. From Businesses Ponder Leaving California [PDF]: "In a recent survey conducted by the California Business Roundtable, about 20% of 400 California businesses said they are planning to move or expand out of state. That's by far the highest figure ever recorded in their survey, the group says."

    I think Arnie has helped quell some of the concern businesses had with previous governor Davis, and I do personally believe the State is getting back on track from some rather fiscally irresponsible years, but California does have wildly inflated property prices, high labor costs relative to other states, and an ever-growing illegal alien problem (which helps mitigate the expensive labor for manual labor jobs, but brings with it a high social services cost that must be borne by the citizens of the state).

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  104. HAAHAHA... WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, geeks participate in sports. Don't be so stereotypical.

    Google is planning going to provide equipment for all the popular sports on the campus: nerf basketball, ping-pong tables, video game consoles, model rockets, and super soakers.


    How the hell can you say "dont be so stereotypical" about geeks not playing sports when you provide a list of activities that are aren't sports at all?

  105. Re:Give me a job! by drsquare · · Score: 1

    I'd take 60k any day, that's four times what I earn now. And it would mean sitting down at a computer all day rather than doing any actual work. Also London isn't a 'cool' city. It's a horrible city full of southerners and flat beer.

  106. Don't mention the weather! by azimir · · Score: 1
    You are forgetting that any time someone mentions that Oregon is not *always* being deluged like the second flood 100 Californians move here! Didn't you get the email about the Party line?

    Party line:
    Rain rain rain. Oh! The Rain. It pours and we freeze day in and day out. Oh look! Freezing rain! Yay, a change.

    Now I need to go work on my early season tan with a nice hike through the neighborhood park.
  107. Re:$$$: Motivation for The Dalles, Oregon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad lives in Fremont (Silicon Valley)...he has a 1brm condo, 750 sqft....currently worth $160k. So much for the "nothing less than $350k" rant...