Slashdot Mirror


Broadband to Kill Off DVD?

Elteto writes "Just when we thought the DVD could not be any more ubiquitous, Serge Tchuruk at the Alcatel Forum in Paris announces that the days of the rapidly adopted medium are nearing their end. The increasing availability, affordability, and speed of broadband will contribute to a more efficient delivery method of media content. Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?"

609 comments

  1. Physicality by useosx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, when people stop being interested in physical objects.

    1. Re:Physicality by jarich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup... DVDs will be gone right after the books!

    2. Re:Physicality by nickirelan · · Score: 1

      We don't have enough bandwith to do that yet.

    3. Re:Physicality by RootsLINUX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Reminds me I saw/heard something on Dr. Phil the other day about a guy who's relationship with his wife was failing because he turned to pr0n for pleasure instead of her. Is this the beginning of the end? Will all boobies get digitized and become virtual entities for our pleasure? Only time will tell...

      --
      Hero of Allacrost, a FOSS RPG for *NIX/*BSD/OS X/Win
    4. Re:Physicality by DustyShadow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How often do you buy CDs? Since mp3's got popular, I barely buy any physical CDs anymore. I think last year I bought maybe 5. Once DVD's are able to be downloaded quickly and easily, I probably won't purchase very many, though I already don't these days because of my netflix subscription.

    5. Re:Physicality by tyleroar · · Score: 0

      Why do you think most people don't buy CD's very much anymore? The people that don't buy CD's anymore are the ones who are downloading MP3's for free.

      --
      Portland, North Dakota Puppies
    6. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Joe consumer likes to have a "thing" in their hands. A case with pretty pictures and an index. Streaming broadband has a long way to go to catch the public's attention. We've had Pay-Per-View for a long time, as HBO, Showtime etc. Even rentals have been around for 20+ years. But, people still BUY movies in a case - it's not going to end soon.

    7. Re:Physicality by useosx · · Score: 1

      Rentals are one thing, but for some reason that is just so...elusive...people still seem to want to buy movies.

      I bought 2 CDs yesterday. I am uninterested in DRM or lossy-only formats.

    8. Re:Physicality by LocoSpitz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I buy about 10 CDs a month, even though I have a digital music player and I could use Napster to get my music at a lower price.

      I like my physical media, and I'm willing to pay more for it.

    9. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, people like me will not watch the movie before they download it. (Yes, I do have highspeed)

    10. Re:Physicality by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Way to generalise based on your own experience...

      No, CDs will not die off. At least not quite yet. There is something more rewarding about having an LP or a CD as opposed to pointing to a folder which represents a a few sectors of your hard drive in such an order that they can play 'Blueberry Hill'.

      DVDs have been able to be downloaded quickly and easily for the past couple of years, but you're right, burners are not the norm yet. At the very least, you will still want to back up your music.

      I still buy a LOT of CDs. My appetite for new music is insatiable to only several degrees below financial ruin. I usually buy the CD, convert it to MP3, then listen to that. I'm still uncomfortable buying albums on iTunes because, well, I just paid money for a file. Paying $0.99 for Guerilla Black's 'Compton' is basically a drop in the hat, so I don't mind. But I'd rather keep "important" works in a format which is at least already backed up. Even if I keep all my CD cases in a box in the basement and all my discs in binders.

      The problem then, is not so much with CDs as it is with iTunes - economically, it makes sense - but for $0.99 I'd like to get more than what amounts to a really good FM recording.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    11. Re:Physicality by mboverload · · Score: 1

      But people love not owning things. Look at iTunes. Thats all the proof you need people love to rent.

    12. Re:Physicality by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Since mp3's got popular, I barely buy any physical CDs anymore.

      Hmm, this seems to go against the Slashdot dogma that MP3 downloads increase CD sales.

    13. Re:Physicality by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      As far as renting DVDs, it's maths. As soon as you rent a DVD 4-5 times, you might as well have bought it. So if you think you are going to buy it that many times, renting it would be like throwing money away.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    14. Re:Physicality by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      SOME people.

      I hate renting. I would much rather purchase something to use at my pleasure than to rely on some promise that the thing I want will be there five years from now when I want it again.

      That desire falls off, of course, at a price point. While I might like my own tile saw, for the four times I've needed them I've rented them at $50/day, rather than spend $900 on a comparable quality tool (mostly because they're large and I don't want to store them.)

      However, I definitely see it as a price point thing, not a percentage thing. Would I stop buying $10.00 DVDs if someone told me they'd always be available via on-demand for $2.00 in the future? No, because I don't trust companies to continue to make stuff like that available.

      I'm probably suffering from 21st Century Affluent Consumer Mindset (Affluenza), but that's how I approach things.

      --
      John
    15. Re:Physicality by Marvelicious · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and I'm sure they won't do that whole "watch once and pay to reuse" bit... Thanks, I'll stick to buying a hard copy I can library... just like I still do with my music. Of course, I'm into movies (and music) that is interesting for more than a brief time. I'm sure everyone d/l'ing Britney on Itunes will be fine getting their copy of "Crossroads," or whatever other piece of crap, this way.

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    16. Re:Physicality by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well, not necessarily. The problem is that physical media are going to be much better as delivery mechanisms for video than broadband, for the foreseeable future. I'll let Steve Jobs explain, for you Apple fans out there. :P

      People are much more attuned to visual quality than audio quality. This is the most amazing thing that happened in the music industry to me: We had the cassettes and then the CD, which raised the quality supposedly, right? The next format after the CD should have been a higher-quality format just like we got television going to high-def, but it wasn't. SAP and DVD audio have totally failed.

      What was the successor to the CD format? MP3, a lower-quality format, but one that provided a convenience of being able to transmit music over the Internet that no other format had. So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life.

      But that's not going to be the case with video. No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet. It ain't going to happen. The download of DVD-quality movies takes hours over most people's broadband connections, and we're going to high-def in 2007, let's say. That's going to add bandwidth and get even slower as we go to high-def. To download a high-def movie is going to take you half a day if the bandwidth increases. Is that instant gratification like a song that takes just a minute to download? No.

      Therefore, the threat to Hollywood--of which we're a small member at Pixar--is very different than the threat to the music industry. Actually, the biggest threat to Hollywood isn't the Internet; the biggest threat to Hollywood is DVD burners.

    17. Re:Physicality by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm the exact opposite. I stopped buying CD's years ago. I stopped burning my MP3s to CD when I bought my Rio Karma. I don't buy DVDs either. Thats what DVD mail rental is for. I do buy books though, so I do agree with you. Why would I pay 8.00 for a paperback I know I'll probably only read once and then stick on a shelf or on a pile, when I can probably borrow the book for free from the Library? Psychology is fascinating...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    18. Re:Physicality by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit.

      1) some people (including me) have been collecting for a long time, and have acquired nearly everything they like.
      2) some people prefer film on DVD's (better value) or video games.

      As I said, I've been collecting cd's since 1986. There are only a handful of artists I enjoy that are still producing new material --- when they release it, I buy it. On rare occasions, I will discover something new, and make a purchase. But, for the most part, I have what I like, and only buy about 6 or 7 cd's per year. I don't do the whole Napster, Kazaa, Torrent, whatever, thing.

    19. Re:Physicality by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've purchased more CDs in the last 6 months after having friends give me oggs of them than I did in the 10 years before that.

      The point is you have 2 datapoints. Not enough to draw any conclusions from at all.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    20. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, CDs will not die off. At least not quite yet. There is something more rewarding about having an LP or a CD as opposed to pointing to a folder which represents a a few sectors of your hard drive in such an order that they can play 'Blueberry Hill'.

      It's called nostalgia.

    21. Re:Physicality by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yup... DVDs will be gone right after the books!

      And backups!
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    22. Re:Physicality by mwilli · · Score: 1

      Let's hope so!!!

      --
      My sig beat up your sig.
    23. Re:Physicality by AmoHongos · · Score: 1

      Physical media will never die off. Not ever. For those of us who spend a lot of time on the internet, it's easy to imagine that almost everyone has already made the switch to non-physical media. The reality's a lot different. According to this website, only 66.8% of Americans even have an internet connection at all. Aside from a handful of other first world countries, that number is even lower in other places. Since there will never be a time when everyone can afford a computer, there will always be a market for physical media.

    24. Re:Physicality by bluephone · · Score: 4, Funny
      "The point is you have 2 datapoints. Not enough to draw any conclusions from at all."

      You, sir, have obviously never worked in government.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    25. Re:Physicality by Orestesx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever heard of movielink.com? I can rent a movie with decent picture quality and start playing it 5 minutes after I click download. And no, I don't have an ultra fast connection, just 1.5 Mb. Sure, it's not as good as DVD quality but its a heck of a lot better than vhs. Jobs seems to think that any movie worth watching is going to be 4 GB in size. With wmv video a 650 MB 2 hour movie is extremely watchable, and the ~1200 MB enhanced quality movies approach DVD-quality. The main thing that they lack is 5.1 sound. Just cause Jobs said it doesn't make it true.

    26. Re:Physicality by ConnectInterrupt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeh I agree. I stopped buying Xbox games this year too. Why bother when I can download them on my Phantom console.

    27. Re:Physicality by Grishnakh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I said, I've been collecting cd's since 1986. There are only a handful of artists I enjoy that are still producing new material --- when they release it, I buy it.

      I'm pretty much the same way. The problem, however, isn't that I'm happy with what I have, and don't want any more. I'd love to hear new music that I really like, just like I like reading books that I've never read, or seeing good movies that I haven't seen. The problem is that there just isn't much good music left; almost all music produced lately is crap.

    28. Re:Physicality by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      While I might like my own tile saw, for the four times I've needed them I've rented them at $50/day, rather than spend $900 on a comparable quality tool

      What kind of tiles are you cutting? You can get small tile saws for $60-90 now that are fine if you're just redoing your kitchen or bathroom, and will probably last as long as you need if you're not using it every day (like a professional).

    29. Re:Physicality by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      Sure, but I think the point is that just as most people prefer MP3 to CD (for convenience, etc.), most people can wait a day or two for a movie if it means you get to watch in HDTV quality. There'll be people who don't mind lower quality in exchange for immediate gratification, but Jobs thinks these people represent a much smaller share of the market. And I tend to agree.

    30. Re:Physicality by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Will all boobies get digitized and become virtual entities for our pleasure?"

      We're the last great generation!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    31. Re:Physicality by Rib+Feast · · Score: 1

      Hardly that - in my country distributors earn approx $60US per rental release title.

      At what point do you think they want to give up the market of DVDs for 50 cent profit shares in streaming movies?

      The barrier won't be technology, it'll be distributors willingly taking a pay cut for the sake of extra consumer convenience...which happens all the time right?

    32. Re:Physicality by Flashbck · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Wow it's really scary when the standard slashdotter would prefer digitized boobies over the real thing... Not to say that the standard slashdotter has ever seen the real thing, much less left his parents basement

    33. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to go out on a limb and say you're not typical. Most people don't care about the RIAA or the MPAA. To these people you're SUPPOSED to pay for stuff because it's the right thing to do. They don't sweat the politics of the stuff because they're too busy with life and work and kids and everything else that's more important to them than what you or I might think.

      I think people are stupid, yes STUPID to pay nearly full price for low-quality MP3s of music when for a couple dollars more (or several dollars less if you buy used CDs) you could get the actual CD AND the ability to create your own MP3s. I have to assume you're not stupid and that you get your MP3s from Bit Torrent and Usenet (tied for #1 as my sources for new music).

      And I think anyone who thinks that downloaded movies will replace DVDs is a little silly. In a situation like that you're REALLY hamstrung as far as playback options. You're tied to a proprietary playback system whereas with actual DVDs even though they're proprietary they are at least ubiquitous. You can get a DVD player for $30.

      In addition, when you buy a DVD you KNOW what you have: you have packaging, you have a disc. You can hold them in your hand. You can't accidentally delete your DVD. You won't lose it to a hard drive crash. You won't put your DVD in to watch it and be forced to pay to proceed. You don't have to re-authenticate your DVDs when you buy a new DVD player.

      I guarantee you (legally) downloadable movies will be so heavily encumbered with DRM that you WILL be worrying about this stuff. Which leaves you with the non-legitimate stuff, which again leaves you outside of the mainstream... which leaves me scratching my head as to how your post could be modded as "insightful" when your opinion realistically means next to nothing.

    34. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comparing DVDs to books doesn't quite work... People buy books because they'd rather read from paper than a screen. People don't buy DVDs because they'd rather watch movies directly off a plastic disc than from a screen.

    35. Re:Physicality by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup... DVDs will be gone right after the books!

      Actually, I don't think it's physicality that's stopping books from going, but: * DRM (I can lend a friend a book, I can't lend a friend an e-book (without breaking TOS))
      * e-book readers at a decent size (the small screen of a PDA is somewhat disuasive)
      * cheap e-book readers
      * Cheaper e-book prices: Why should I pay the same for an e-book as a normal book? It doesn't cost the same to make.
      * Availability (more and more books are being offered as e-books, but many books also aren't).

      Having said that, when available, I buy the e-book.

    36. Re:Physicality by MrHatken · · Score: 1


      I'm not so sure (that people wouldn't go for a bit lower quality video).

      Look at how VCD's took off (in a big way) in Asia.

      The mass market (at least in Aus and the US) hasn't been given the chance of doing the "MP3 for Video" thing.

      I think if you could download all your favourite TV shows and movies and watch them when you want and where it may take off.

      I think a lot of it has to do with convenience.

      TiVo has made TV convenient for me, and I watch it rather than the HDTV available (real-time).

      Cheers,
      Ashley.

    37. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What was the successor to the CD format? MP3, a lower-quality format, but one that provided a convenience of being able to transmit music over the Internet that no other format had. So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life.


      Except HE'S DEAD WRONG about MP3s succeeding CDs. They're complimentary, not mutually exclusive. Just because he's Steve Jobs doesn't mean he's always right.

      Usually right, but not always. 8^)

    38. Re:Physicality by Caseyscrib · · Score: 1
      I usually download the cds from bittorrent and if I like the music I'll go out and buy the CD. I prefer the cd over a digital file because of the DRM stuff. When I buy something, I don't want somebody telling me how to use it. Granted, I can burn an iTunes song 7 times, but its still a limitation that does not exist with CDs. The way I see it, I can spend an extra $1 and get the CD AND the mp3s. Probably not a logical reason, but more psychological.

      I also like the artwork included with the cd, and its nice to go back and listen to music you listened to 5 years ago. I can usually remember my thoughts and feelings at the time listening to it and see how I've changed. With MP3's, I don't think the connection would be as strong.

      And on a further note, when you burn CDs, the labels peel off after a long period of time. I wouldn't want my data being lost.

    39. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quickly?
      I'd say 2.5mbit down is standard broadband right now. some quick google calculating:
      (search for 4 gigabytes / 2.5 megabit / sec for those of you playing along at home).
      3.6 hours if you can download the DVDR at full speed. For the majority of you that dont have the luxory of some magical ftp sites, thats unlikely. Off p2p, its more likely to average about 1mbit if youre lucky, which is 9.1 hours. Not exactly Video On Demand here.

      Dual Layer dvds are becoming popular, and soon there will be scene releases for those too. Double all of these durations and you have a download so long its hardly worth it.

      -S

    40. Re:Physicality by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Why would I pay 8.00 for a paperback I know I'll probably only read once and then stick on a shelf or on a pile, when I can probably borrow the book for free from the Library? Psychology is fascinating...

      Well I can't answer for you, but for me: I don't ;) When I buy a book, I do so because I know it will be good enough to read it in the future. Why don't I just borrow it? Well the big thing is convenience. When I borrow it from the library I feel like I must read it in 2 weeks. Many times I read late at night, so I have to wait until I'm free to go to the library during the day, on a day it's open (isn't open sunday or monday).

      I can borrow more then one book, but often I'll plan to read book X after I finish the one I'm reading, but once I finish it I'll change my mind. With books I already own all of this is a non-issue.

    41. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As a librarian we're often asked about books and their demise.
      This is far from true.
      If you consider all forms of human communication, over 80% of it is in written form.
      Also consider the pro/con of books.

      easier to read
      lasts much longer than most electronic media formats (cds, dvds, hdd, etc...)
      you don't need a computer to read it
      durable

      cons:
      takes up space
      not as portable
      not easy to access

      There are obviously more pro/cons than this but consider the fact books are here to stay for at least another 10-20 years. I hope E-ink makes some significant headway and the huge NYPL digitization project (which will take 10 years to complete)
      will make electronic formats more popular.

    42. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life."

      -- Steve Jobs

      Excuse me? Steve is either confused, lying, or praising the quality of Windows.

    43. Re:Physicality by filmmaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not quite true, Mr. Jobs. The first time people accepted lower quality for the convenience of portability and copy-ability was when we accepted cassette tapes as substitutes for hi-def LPs.

    44. Re:Physicality by lamz · · Score: 1

      No, Joe Consumer, in 2005, wants his buddy to burn him a copy. In the 80s and 90s, he wanted his buddy to tape it for him. Sometimes he just turns the radio on. "They mostly play good stuff," he says.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    45. Re:Physicality by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life.

      Remember the Concord...not too mention air travel in gerneral, there was a time when they had bars and grand pianos on flights now where a whisker away from advertising "free-range-flights" like we do with chicken eggs. Perhaps a bit over the top but you get the point.

      --
      serenity now!
    46. Re:Physicality by BlackMagi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      CDs and DVDs don't explode when my computer does. Mostly, my DVD collection defines me as a person. If I just wanted to watch them, I could rent them way cheaper. Apart from the imports, of course. Mostly I just want to express myself, and that means putting my DVDs on display so that other people can interpret me through my collection. -BM

      --
      http://melbournephilosophy.com/
    47. Re:Physicality by bman08 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will keep my dvd copy of Crossroads as well thank you. Ralph Maccio's apocalyptic guitar-off against satanic Steve Vai must sit on the shelf and gather real physical dust alongside Road House and Red Dawn. (Don't ask me why a Maccio 'c' is betwixt Swazye 'r's. You have your organization and I have mine.

    48. Re:Physicality by FuturePastNow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think you've hit on the reasons for CDs to exist. A pressed-disc CD will probably last longer than you will, as opposed to a burned disc that will deteriorate in a few years.

      Also, a 128kbps download will just not please some people. Audiophiles want the maximum quality they can get, and if they want it digital, they will rip it themselves to their own specifications.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    49. Re:Physicality by evilviper · · Score: 4, Insightful
      DVDs will be gone right after the books!

      Terrible comparison. eBooks COULD have taken over the world, but technology is holding them back. Screens are still poor technology for reading, every e-book reader out there is propritary, and DRM is a sure way to stop adoption of anything.

      If videos are offered without those impediments, they have a good chance of replacing physical media.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    50. Re:Physicality by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...rent a DVD 4-5 times...

      Renting a DVD and watching it is a lot cheaper, since most movies are only worth watching once, if that. However, IF it is one worth watching multiple times, then I add it to my collection. If I am about to take a trip, I copy one or two of my favorites onto the HD of my laptop so I can leave the disk safely at home.

      --
      All theory is gray
    51. Re:Physicality by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The problem is that there just isn't much good music left; almost all music produced lately is crap.

      There are a lot of people who feel the way you do, but it's just an illusion created by the *AA's need for artificial scarcities. Now that BMG et al's near monopoply of distribution channels has all but been dissolved, What I suspect what we'll see happening over the next few years is the fragmentation of the music market as niche players find their way to the music buying public.

      There's somewhat of a hiatus at the moment, since the big companies still have control over marketing, but out of the limelight, there are a lot of talented artists producing their own music and taking advantage of inexpensive, high quality recording and mixing gear.

      There's plenty of great musicians out there, and there are plenty of us wanting to hear great music. It's just taking some time to route around the *AA blockage and connect the two groups.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    52. Re:Physicality by pipsey · · Score: 1

      Let's do some reality checking here:

      1) The average non-audiophile will never be able to tell the difference between a 128kbit stereo mp3 and a CD. Napster or Itunes might not be suitable to someone who has a $1000 speaker system, but for someone like me or Joe Sixpack, buying songs over a digital medium, where a) you don't have to leave your house and b) you don't have to wait more than about 10 seconds to start listening to the first track, is damn convenient.

      2) No, downloadable movies are never going to replace DVDs in the same way that Napster will not replace CDs, but again, there is a market here. I have a netflix subscription, but I'd rather have a napster-like downloaded subscription where I can download movies and watch them over and over as long as I pay the monthly charge(I'd be willing to pay 30 or so for something like this). Yes, it'd only be marginally faster than netflix, but again, it's about the convenience.

      Also, what you are forgetting about itunes and napster is the subscription services. For $10 per month, I can download and listen to as much music as I'd like, and I think that's a pretty good deal personally. I listen to a lot of music out of the mainstream, stuff that's more easily available on napster than in real stores in my area (celtic and world music, for example. Good luck finding that at Best Buy). Not only is it improbable I could find that anywhere else but Amazon, but given how much of how many different kinds of music I listen to, $10 a month is a steal.

    53. Re:Physicality by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...people settled for lower quality...

      Actually, if you have a top-notch system in a quiet environment and a pair of golden ears, you might hear the difference between an iTunes AAC file and the CD itself. If you are playing your music in a car, while jogging or in a myriad of other situations, you will not be able to tell the difference in the sound quality.

      --
      All theory is gray
    54. Re:Physicality by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      that works for you... but for most, having a book is much better tahn reading on a PDA. those screens are small and not fun to read on. i also hate trying to read something on a computer screen. whenever people ask me to proofread a paper for them, i make sure it's printed out first. it's just easier. so yes, physicality is a big part of this.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    55. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad your stereo sucks. Since I bought my Klipsch speakers and more recently started buying DVD/Audio discs, I may not buy many more CDs. MP3 is an okay portable format but they sound like ass.

      The RIAA should be pushing a higher definition format than CD as the best way to combat MP3.

      Frank Zappa said, in the early eighties, that music should be sold in some sort of online format. The music industry never cared for Frank. Ergo, it may never happen.

    56. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention the ability to take it with you.

      Me: Hey, wanna see *new release movie*.
      Friend: Sure bring it over and we can watch it on my new HDTV.
      Me: Ok, I'll be over after packing up my computer.

    57. Re:Physicality by brogdon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "What was the successor to the CD format? MP3, a lower-quality format, but one that provided a convenience of being able to transmit music over the Internet that no other format had. So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life."

      This would be a fine point, except for the fact that in most situations, with the speakers and headphones that most people use, the quality of the two formats is almost indistinguishable. The average user has a $300 iPod hooked up to a $15 pair of headphones. The relatively minor difference in quality is going to be muddled over by the poor output of his cans.

      Hence mp3 won out because convenience was all that John Q. Public knew to judge by.

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
    58. Re:Physicality by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think Steve is mostly right on this one, except as someone else just pointed out, this isn't the first time this has happened.

      While some people here are going to say that MP3s are really a replacement for cassettes, or are just complementary to CDs, and not a replacement (in terms of audio quality), the truth is that most people simply cannot hear the difference. To most people, MP3s not only sound just as good as CDs, they offer many big advantages as far as portability, downloadability, etc. This is why they're so popular. CDs are still great for archival however.

      Video, however, is different. Unless someone is half-blind, they'll easily be able to tell the difference between NTSC TV and HDTV. NTSC has always looked like crap; people only put up with it because it was the standard, and technology wasn't much better for a long time. VHS was even worse, offering noticeably worse quality than even NTSC sets were capable of. SVHS was a big improvement, but was too expensive and never caught on. But look what happened when DVD was introduced: it had audio and video quality beyond what regular NTSC could support, and equally importantly, was very reasonably priced. DVD has consequently exploded in popularity.

      However, it's all relative: even in video, a level of quality is going to eventually be reached where typical people just can't see the difference. Because audio is so much simpler to record, we reached this level technologically long before we will with video, but it will happen eventually.

    59. Re:Physicality by Madcapjack · · Score: 1

      I'm actually worried that the move to selling MP3's will lead to the further centralization of the market. transfering mp3's over the net is a lot different that sending a disc in the mail. Why buy from jo blo when you can go direct, with their fast and reliable servers?

    60. Re:Physicality by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      I used rarely listen to music until I went to college and had the bandwidth to download music, and that got me hooked so now I have a lot of (legal)CDs. So in my case it worked, although now I find myself buy from iTunes a bit more, but that's mostly when I just wan't a song or two, and most of my albums are physical CDs. I would probably still be downloading though if the P2P networks didn't go to crap. I think the RIAA purposely posted crappy versions of their stuff just to drive people away.

    61. Re:Physicality by m_maximus · · Score: 1

      Bad ananlogy. This is more an issue of cost more than anything else. Because people choose airlines based on price more than quality. You also have to consider that in the early days of air travel it had to compete with the ocean liners for passengers, so had to be more luxurious than today to compete. Also airships could afford the space & weight for such things as pianos. And Concorde was politics more than anything else. I think the primary threat to DVD will coem from the studios themselves when they try to turn everything into one big pay per view system. Converthing audio into analoge and back into digital again results in a reletivly small loss in audio quality on everyday equipment. Doing the same thing with video however results in a much greater percived loss of audio quality. So in an attempt to stop piracy, I think the studios may just stop releasing DVDs all together, and just release everything pay per view. This will make it harder to priate (I'm pretty sure that there are moderen TV encryption systems that haven't been cracked) and they get to charge you every time you watch it.

      --
      I have a solution but you're not going to like it. (Something I say far too forten to my boss)
    62. Re:Physicality by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think "real" books are going to be with us for a while, but other printed materials like magazine and newspapers will largely get replaced in the near future.

    63. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, astroturfing Movielink shill!

    64. Re:Physicality by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      physicality is a big part of this.

      I took the original poster to mean "people see worth in something physical, not software." You mentioned two things that aren't related to that at all.

    65. Re:Physicality by dubl-u · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet.

      Maybe I'm unusual but I'm perfectly happy with download-quality video for most movies. When I rent something and don't watch it before I return it, I'll sometimes copy it to CD until I get the time. It seems fine to me on my mid-range gear. For the kinds of things where picture quality really matters (like, say, a Peter Greenaway film) I'd rather see it in the theater anyhow.

      What I really want is a cross between a theater, a bar, and a video store. Imagine a place with a variety of different sized rooms, from 2 seats to 30, all of them equipped with kick-ass AV. Up front, they have beer on tap and good stock of movies and console titles. There's no way I'll drop a few grand on a system I use five hours a month, but I'd happily rent out a room so I and a dozen pals can do a movie night.

    66. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beautiful!

    67. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (s)He may be generaliseing from personal experiance, but so are you. However, CD sales are falling, if slowly, and it's not unreasonable to asume that leagal download servicis like itunes will help kill CD's off even faster.

    68. Re:Physicality by trisweb · · Score: 1

      (I know I'm basically replying to Steve Jobs, but I might as well)

      I think that the problem with the music industry is that they failed to release a sufficiently higher quality format before (or during) the digital revolution. They trained the public to want convenience over quality. It started with the CD -- people were reluctant to switch from vinyl because they knew that going to digital was a step down in fidelity. And they were right -- if you've ever heard an audiophile recording on LP, there's no denying that there's more there than you could ever fit on a CD. But the mainstream public got sold on CDs as more convenient, more reliable, and with a lower noise floor. It was a different kind of quality, and it trained us to forget about fidelity. If the industry had embraced DVD-audio or even SACDs as the "new standard" in audio media, then the public might have reversed their downhill slide and gone back to loving high fidelity music. But instead, we're still stuck with the "CDs are more convenient than LPs or cassettes" and that mentality led in a straight line to "mp3s are even more convenient than CDs!" Same deal. If SACD or DVD-Audio were the standard, people would listen to an mp3 and say, "what is this crap??" Unfortunately for the industry, they trained us to ignore fidelity a long time ago, and now they're feeling the repercussions.

      --
      "!"
    69. Re:Physicality by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      Wow it's really scary when the standard slashdotter would prefer digitized boobies over the real thing... Not to say that the standard slashdotter has ever seen the real thing, much less left his parents basement

      Well what other kind of boobies can there be after all of our brains have been downloaded into robots.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    70. Re:Physicality by plover · · Score: 1
      I use them for tiling bathrooms, floors and most recently for sawing walkway paver bricks (about 80 feet of curved walkway, every brick that touched the edge was saw cut.) I use the overhead ripsaw style, not the cheapo tiny Home Despot tablesaw style. I usually borrow a decent one from my father-in-law, but the last two times I've needed it, he's been using it for the bricks on his own house. It was easier to rent one than to wait. While at the store, I looked at the table saw style (it was cheaper than the rental) but decided against it.

      A buddy of mine who is finishing his house bought one of those tiny ones a month ago thinking it'd be just fine for his three sections of floor and two bathrooms' walls. It served him for about 50 linear feet of sawing before it started acting up. Grit got in the fence locking mechanism, grinding it up and preventing it from locking tightly. That was just doing his entryway. He still has two bathroom floors plus the shower walls to go yet. He's going to return the cheap table saw, and he'll probably get one of the lower-end overhead saws. I suggested renting, but like me he's been having a lot of fun with tiling, so I think he'll buy it.

      I've never had any problems with the bricksaw style cutters. They take a bit of maintenance to ensure the water pump is always submerged and clean, and delivering water to the blade. And things get loose and need to be tightened. But beyond that, I really prefer the rigid arm, large diameter blade and flood of water. When things start to mud up, they're really easy to take apart and clean. I also like the blade to fling the grit downwards into the tank, rather than upwards at me. (But I still build a booth every time I use one. Even outside, it's just easier to contain the mess.)

      I suppose I've done about a half-dozen bathroom showers, a couple of floors and the paver walkway. I rented the saw for a couple days for the pavers, and for one of the showers. (Hmm... I'm pretty sure I borrowed tile saws for all the other work, so it probably wasn't four rentals. Whatever.)

      --
      John
    71. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont forget that before taking over Apple, Jobs had become a Windows devtool vendor, more or less.

      He may think Windows lacks "taste" but I'm sure he understand Microsoft's technical ability.

    72. Re:Physicality by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Well, I buy about 10 CDs a month, even though I have a digital music player and I could use Napster to get my music at a lower price.

      I like my physical media, and I'm willing to pay more for it.


      What do CD's cost where you live? In Finland they cost between 10 and 20 Euros, so for ten it would be around 150 Euros per month. That's a huge sum of money.

      Maybe CD's are cheap in some places but for me buying lots of them simply isn't an option. Hell, even when I was single and lived in my grandfather's appartment (almost for free) I couln't afford more than maybe 5 CD's a month, and some were used...

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    73. Re:Physicality by lymph · · Score: 1
      Having a personal library is also nice. Sure, I could download "Foundation Trilogy" and save shelf space, but reading in a park without battery operated crap, should not be an underrated experience.

      Technophiles...

    74. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet. It ain't going to happen.

      Well, I would. I'm fine with my VHS. Sure, it is to a 1985 VHS what a DVD is to today's VHS, but still... DVD is a technology that, for me, could have never existed and I wouldn't miss it for a blink.

      Maybe I change my mind when DVD recorders are as ubiquitous as VCRs are today. That is, if they don't get a technology to block some shows from recording. Late night shows recording is what I use my VCR for mostly.

    75. Re:Physicality by EkkiEkkiShiwaddle · · Score: 1
      How often do I buy CDs? Well, let's see... Since MP3s got popular, I started buying a lot MORE CDs simply because I was exposed to a lot more music than I heard before.

      At the moment, I average about 5 CDs a week, and I'm still nowhere near a complete collection.

    76. Re:Physicality by prockcore · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ralph Maccio's apocalyptic guitar-off against satanic Steve Vai must sit on the shelf and gather real physical dust

      The funny part is that it was actually Steve Vai versus himself. The karate kid knows neither karate, nor shredding.

      Why do I know that? Probably for the same reason you own the damn movie :)

    77. Re:Physicality by roseblood · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then again, perhaps broadband may kill the DVD star...

      ugh, just mod me down now.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    78. Re:Physicality by pekkak · · Score: 1

      Well I would think that natural selection will weed out this particular trait pretty quickly from human race. In the good ole days this same guy might have had offspring all around the world, now all he has is probably a really disgustingly messy keyboard =) times they are a-changing indeed.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
    79. Re:Physicality by pekkak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because books look cool and you can really impress people with a decent bookshelf. Usually the two most interesting dead things for me in anyone's apartment are their books and cd's. Oh yea, someone could object that I could also impress people with a great personality but they don't sell those in stores. Books I can buy though.

      --
      What are we going to do tomorrow night? The same thing we do every night, Pinky. Try to take over the world!
    80. Re:Physicality by backjackII · · Score: 2, Informative

      CDs (and DVDs, for that matter) do not last forever, even if used. Optical media is subject to a decay called "CD Rot", which essentially means that it has a shelf life of ~10 years.
      Better start backing up your 1991 CDs.
      DVD Rot Info: http://www.mv.com/ipusers/richbreton/m/files/cd_ro t.htm

    81. Re:Physicality by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Newspapers are far from gone. People want something they can read on the bus, and it doesn't matter too much it they forget it or it falls on the floor or gets stamped on. They want something they can take to work and leave it lying about on the shop floor without losing hundreds of pounds if their e-reader gets robbed. They want giant pages they can lie out on the table rather than a tiny screen. They want pictures they can cut out and stick on the wall without dragging a printer about.

    82. Re:Physicality by drsquare · · Score: 1

      At least with Internet porn you're guaranteed something good-looking. You don't have to put up with small tits, obesity, stretch-marks, pubic hair, cellulite, saggy tits/arse, ugliness. The Internet filters out the cream of the crop. Also women on the Internet are much easier, they've no qualms with getting fucked in the arse by someone they've only just met.

    83. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, broadband will not kill DVDs because one can abuse books to more extent than DVDs, while they still remain quite readable. Ok. Gimme the number of your dealer, you must have some really good shit over there.

    84. Re:Physicality by philipgar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you haven't found music that you like from the past 5-10 years you must not be looking hard enough. There are so many bands out there I discover everyday.

      Granted I normally discover bands that have been out for 10 years and then go pick up their back catalob but they're there. And ten years from now I'll be picking up cds (or whatever) from bands that just started today etc.

      The problem is tracking down these bands. What I've found that works great is track down the origins of your favorite bands. Find what bands they enjoy playing with, find what bands they influenced and what bands influenced them. follows roots and follow branches (not to be confused with a jethro tull album by a similar name). I am a big fan of the minneapolis music scene (past and present) and have found it highly rewarding finding out about these bands. I also found links to completely unrelated bands that are a completley diffent style of music and from another part of the country.

      this method works great. Its especially fun playing 7 degrees of seperation between bands in your collection.

      Anyhow, finding new bands is where your napsters and kazaa come into play. I read on band X's message board that band Y is great. I won't go buy band Y's cd because of that. However I do go download some of band Y's song. If I like it within a year or so I'll purchase one or more of their cds. Its the way I work.

      I tend to enjoy buying the physical product. its good to own something. Also buying used (normally off of ebay) I generally pay ~$10 for a cd after shipping. This is less than what itunes charges assuming the cd is more than 10 tracks (or does itunes still offer 9.99 albums) and I also geet the artwork and no restrictions.

      Phil

    85. Re:Physicality by vext01 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I buy dvds and cd very often, and I like to have an object which can actually be owned. Also I think that the artwork was meant to be a piece of the music. I have never bought an mp3 and never will. I buy cd's and compress them to vorbis to put on my walkman. End

    86. Re:Physicality by Chuq · · Score: 1

      I would've thought a portable (USB/Firewire) hard drive would be easier?

      --
      - Chuq
    87. Re:Physicality by Pollardito · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life."
      it's funny that he should say that given that the Apple argument has always been that their "higher quality computer" is only losing the PC arms race because of interoperability/price issues (both could be seen as convenience)
      "But that's not going to be the case with video. No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet. It ain't going to happen."
      i'll have to remember that the next time that i'm watching clips of The Daily Show on a jumpy/grainy RealPlayer feed because it's more convenient than catching it at its scheduled time. also, isn't it fairly standard that DVD pirates apply lossy compression to fit movies onto single layer DVDs? couldn't we be more willing to settle for lower quality audio than video due to the fact that our threshhold for detailed vision is lightyears ahead of current technology, while our threshhold for detailed audio is quite often outdone by current tech? i've been fooled by ringing phones and sirens in TV commercials, but i've never been close to believing that something that i saw on the screen was actually happening in the same room. once you've reached that level of realism, you can sacrifice further gains for convenience without a thought.
    88. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      don't buy CD's
      don't buy CD's

      "CDs".

    89. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go one step further back.

      Cassettes, which are 1/8" tape with 4 tracks running at 1.75 ips, replaced consumer reel-to-reel, which used 1/4" tape with either 4 or 2 tracks, running at anything up to 15ips (or 30 if you're crazy).

      Again, a tremendous drop in quality, in the name of convenience.

    90. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * DRM (I can lend a friend a book, I can't lend a friend an e-book (without breaking TOS))

      Uh, how much longer before printers are considered "DRM breaching device" (oh, wait...) and book buyers frowned upon as "stinky pinko content sharers". Buy a book with cash and you are doubleplusnogood suspect.
    91. Re:Physicality by 0zymandias · · Score: 0

      >>But that's not going to be the case with video. No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet.

      Which would explain DivX's lack of popularity.....

      --
      "Danke daß Du mich gemolken hast" said the German cow.
    92. Re:Physicality by Drakonite · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You haven't bought a book lately have you? Last time I spilled water on a book numerous pages were rendered unreadable and the glass was almost empty.

      On the same token, I've had a full glass of water spilled directly onto my PDA (which I use as an ebook reader) while it was running (and charger plugged in no less) and after quickly shutting it off and letting it dry out before using it again it still works great.

      "crumple pages etc of it up" ... if I applied the same force in crumpling a book as it'd take for my PDA to flex at all it'd rip the book in half.

      As for burning... Unless the flame was placed directly on the touch screen with an open cover I seriously doubt my PDA could be damaged enough to stop it from working by a fire that wouldn't destroy enough of the book to make it unreadable.

      For the record, despite how easy ebooks are (or could be) to obtain, I prefer reading printed books as well... but some of your reasoning is complete bullshit.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    93. Re:Physicality by rjshields · · Score: 1

      Well I don't know about you but I'd rather watch a plastic disk.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    94. Re:Physicality by kbw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People buy DVDs because they don't want to have to keep paying to each time the movie is watched.

    95. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "people were reluctant to switch from vinyl because they knew that going to digital was a step down in fidelity"

      What complete twaddle. People avoided CDs initially becuase they needed to fork out for entirely new sounds sytems (ok fine just a CD player but they were damn expensive initially) without seeing the benefit. Turns out CDs are substantially better quality than vinyl and the technology proved more than a flash in the pan so it took off. Same for DVD video. Once people were sure it would stick around long enough for the hardware outlay to be worth it they jumped on board.

      Vinyl LPs may be analogue so potentially hold more information but CDs encode to far higher frequencies than human hearing can detect. DVD audio has flopped because it offers nothing beyond what CDs offer now. Who cares if it has a higher bit rate if all of the extra sound is outside of the range or human hearing? You could offer terrabyte sound files with sample rates in the GHz band but it wouldn't make them sound any better if we can't hear beyond 20kHz.

      You may want LPs to sound better, doesn't mean they do. In fact higher bitrate MP3s are completely indistinguishable from CD (that is high) quality recordings in double blind tests. Any difference you hear is not in the sound going into your ears, its in the space between them.

    96. Re:Physicality by DiD+Roe · · Score: 1
      However, it's all relative: even in video, a level of quality is going to eventually be reached where typical people just can't see the difference. Because audio is so much simpler to record, we reached this level technologically long before we will with video, but it will happen eventually.

      Surely that point has been reached already, you've got DVD -> MPEG-4 (divx, xvid, etc).

      The quality difference between XviD and DVDs is not that big, especially with multiple passes, yet the size is significantly smaller. That's exactly the same situation as MP3s, sure one format is by definition lower quality, but you can't really tell in most situations.

      Or where you referring to the quality of the original images, before any compression?

    97. Re:Physicality by mr100percent · · Score: 1

      iTunes AAC tracks are way better than some FM recording. What is the equivalent of a good FM recording, 96kbps mp3? iTunes offers a 128kbps AAC file, which in my ears sounds as good as a 160 or even 92kbps mp3. Heck, it even includes Album cover art, and all the track info encoded properly.

    98. Re:Physicality by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      plus.. people still want to get drunk and read.. a TV or computer - heck, even a laptop are very hard to hold in conjunction with your body movement when swaying back-and-forth (think not just drunk, but moving in excessively jolting forms of transportation) .. so a book being very light, durable, and geared towards single recognition (a movie IS more socially exceptable than a book) would be more adaptable in a traveling situation (something this commercial and capitalist world is moving into for efficiency reasons) - it seems reasonable to state that a book is not immediately replacable until our society replaces its economic structure from the ground up.. (think paperless office.. WHERE IS THAT???)

      good luck to all those who think we are near. I wish the same, but I am a realist.

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
    99. Re:Physicality by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1

      And claytablets will be gone any day now. Oh wait, they are gone, and replaced with paper/papyrus/books etc. I am not convinced the book in its current form will exist forever. Maybe books with electronic paper will be the next step.

    100. Re:Physicality by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, since I've started using AllOfMP3.com, I've spent more on music than the last five years combined (almost none). Maybe it's because I feel I'm getting my money's worth?

    101. Re:Physicality by kolleykibber · · Score: 1

      It's about covenience and instant availability- read lazyness. Amazon is easier to use than a library. Itunes is easier to use than waiting for Amazon CDs. All the economic pointers suggest an Itunes offering quick movie downloads will kill DVD purchases.

      Until we have an instant book binder, it'll always be better to buy a bound book than to print one out and staple the pages together.

    102. Re:Physicality by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think Steve is mostly right on this one, except as someone else just pointed out, this isn't the first time this has happened.

      Indeed. I can come up with many more excamples. Cinema lost popularity when TV started to become popular (although regained market share when quality improved drastically). I'm not totally sure you can compare VHS with NTSC broadcast since this is complementary rather than a replacement, but VHS also gained from Betamax because of convenience (cheaper, longer tapes etc). In Europe, standard defintion digital TV replaced higher quality analogue because of the convenince of more channels. Mobile phones have replaced the higher audio quality

    103. Re:Physicality by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

      I do a lot of video production for the different firms I freelance for, and, as video tends to be LARGE, DVD remains the only medium currently (aside from a large stash of external HDD's) that are suitable for transporting these videos to the site of the presentation/pitch. If I were to attempt, in any case, to manage a broadband download to the site of the prospective client/current client of a large (read up to 2 GB) video, the IT department on the other end would be in fucking stitches! No, as a medium, DVD will be around for a while. It's the size of the pipe: the broadband pipe may be large enough, but the pipe in competency remains small.

      --
      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
    104. Re:Physicality by Freexe · · Score: 1
      The problem with this is that when you find a good band using this method the only place you can normally find the music is online!

      Last time i bought 1 of the last 10 CDs the band had left

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell
    105. Re:Physicality by Elranzer · · Score: 1

      Broadband to Kill Off DVD?

      No, but Blu-Ray probably will...

    106. Re:Physicality by malkavian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah..
      People buy DVDs because:

      1: They hve pretty covers (and usually extra bits on the DVD).

      2: They're viewable in guaranteed high quality on a cheap piece of hardware.

      3: You don't have to be connected to the net to watch a DVD.

      4: You don't have noisy cooling fans in the background when watching a DVD.

      5: If you hate the movie, at least you get a great coaster for your money.

      A competing format may well help lower the cost of the disks though, which would be a great boon to us all.

    107. Re:Physicality by STrinity · · Score: 1

      The average non-audiophile will never be able to tell the difference between a 128kbit stereo mp3 and a CD.

      I'm not an audiophile, and I can tell the difference between a CD and 196kbit mp3. If you gave the average person the Pepsi Challenge with mp3s and CDs, I bet they could tell the difference too.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    108. Re:Physicality by rob_squared · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pardon me, but some people do like reading books off of a screen, because it lets me keep hundreds of books in my pockets, and not even the mightiest of cargo pants can boast that for physical books.

      Besides, with screen that are beginning to have the look of paper, I imagine ebooks will become much more popular.

      --
      I don't get it.
    109. Re:Physicality by STrinity · · Score: 1

      CD Rot was a problem with early CDs and modern Cheap CD-*; CDs bought in the last fifteen years shouldn't have a problem.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    110. Re:Physicality by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Depending where you shop, 10 CDs will cost you between $100 and $180. For a middle class American that's a moderate entertainment budget.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    111. Re:Physicality by mrdaveb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A DVD collection is similar to a music collection - it's a significant investment of time and money. If it doesn't fill up a shelf and people can't browse it and admire/laugh at your taste, then it seems less worthwhile.

      It's still very difficult for a lot of people to attach value to 1s and 0s that don't come in a pretty container. It's obviously more convenient if you you have all your movies on a hard-drive, but it's definitely lacking something.

      --
      Homme petit d'homme petit, s'attend, n'avale
    112. Re:Physicality by joestar · · Score: 1

      No I'm not downloading any DivX. I'm buying DVDs instead. Yes. Well. Hmmm....

    113. Re:Physicality by joestar · · Score: 2, Informative

      > We don't have enough bandwith to do that yet.

      In France, thanks in particular to Free.fr, broadband ADSL access is now very common and efficient.

      For instance, with the Freebox you get 10Mbps (Down), 1Mbps (Up) (really!) + TV (MPEG2) + Free IP phone to every "fix" French number. The cost for that is 30 euro/month (around $39).

    114. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Newspapers are far from gone. People want something they can read on the bus

      I would like to be able to read a newspaper on the bus without having half the broadsheet flopping onto other people.

    115. Re:Physicality by rockedbottom · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it Ry Cooder vs. Jack 'Devil Boy' Butler ( Vai ) ?

    116. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did Sugar-Ray Lemon turn into Blu-Ray after trying to kill the man with the snakeskin jacket? ("This is a snakeskin jacket! A symbol of my belief in personal freedom" etc etc ad nauseam...)

    117. Re:Physicality by mrak+and+swepe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And with a physical disk, at least you have some control over how much advertising you have to watch before the movie starts (although analogue tape wins hands-down on this issue).

      Call me cynical, but I can't help but believe that streamed movies will be prefixed with 20 minutes of un-skippable ads.

    118. Re:Physicality by kafka93 · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, this is precisely why I've radically cut down on the number of purchases I make of music on CD. When the music itself can be purchased in a digital format, I find it difficult to countenance the purchase of a CD that will, sooner or later, wind up a landfill (cd cases etc. inclusive). Now, yes, there's something nice about having the physical medium - particularly for things like cd booklets etc. - but then I figure that most of these things wind up sitting in my CD folders, ignored, a few days after I buy them.

      For the music fan, I suspect that the true appeal of the physical media lies in being able to establish oneself as a true music snob: having hundreds to thousands of CDs (or records!) is a far greater statement than is having gigabytes of mp3s....

    119. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I would like to be able to read a newspaper on the bus without having half the broadsheet flopping onto other people.

      Either (a) learn how to read a broadsheet on the bus (it's not difficult), or (b) lobby the publishers of your paper to make a tabloid edition available; it's worked for every paper that's tried it, to the extent that some have abandoned their broadsheet editions altogether.

      Me, I prefer physical papers to reading web papers on my laptop because nobody's going to mug you for a 50p newspaper, but a £2000 laptop is rather more likely to attract undesirable attention.

    120. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least with Internet porn you're guaranteed something good-looking.

      Either you haven't met Mr. Goatse and Miss Tubgirl, or your tastes are... seriously weird.

    121. Re:Physicality by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That method works for me as well. I used to room with a guy who would randomly buy a cd every week by someone he had never listened to. Much of it was crap. Some of it was pretty good. I discovered Nick Cave by listening to a cover song on a Neil Young Tribute album. I filed it away. A few years later I went to Blockbuster Music, and grabbed Murder Ballads and listened to it in the store. Awesome stuff. Now I own his entire catalog. But, I got even more bang for my buck when I did some research on Nick, and discovered artists like Barry Adamson, Foetus (my absolute favorite artist, bar none), Lydia Lunch, Swans, and others that get zero radio exposure.

    122. Re:Physicality by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Still, $2K per year would still put you a bit out on the tail of the bell curve, I'd guess. Personally, I'd have trouble with just the decision-making required to buy 10 CDs a month.

      You're right about us Americans, though. We'd choose entertainment over food and shelter if we had to. Gotta have something to soak up all of that idle time before we die...

    123. Re:Physicality by richieb · · Score: 1
      No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet.

      Actually, VHS won over Beta, because of convenience. VHS could record 6 hours of stuff at low quality and Beta could not.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    124. Re:Physicality by rabbit78 · · Score: 1

      Audiophiles want the maximum quality they can get, and if they want it digital

      Real audiophiles surely don't want it digital, at least not from CD. I still prefer a good analog LP over the CD crap sound, though I have heard audio-DVDs are quite ok.

    125. Re:Physicality by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

      Jobs is WRONG. I've been downloading Divx encoded movies (650MBs) for a while and absolutely love it. It's not only watcheable but enjoyable!

      A few more things...

      1) Movies, unlike mp3's, are more of a one-time deal. Once you've watched something you often don't care to watch it again.

      2) By being able to download multiple movies at once, after the inital lag, you can wake up every day and have something new to watch. I don't need instant gratification is a necessity, because if were true, Netflix would not be so popular.

      3) Jobs has a financial incentive to play down internet video to disparage competitors like Archos. After all, his iPod only works for mp3's.

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
    126. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Jobs said:

      "What was the successor to the CD format? MP3, a lower-quality format, but one that provided a convenience of being able to transmit music over the Internet that no other format had. So convenience won out and people settled for lower quality. The first time I've ever seen that in my life."

      only because he hasn't lived that long.

      Manuscripts to books
      live music to phonograph
      live conversation to telephone
      plays to movies
      movies to TV

      convenience always wins and morphs to new categories of experience. IPods can do things that CDs can't.

    127. Re:Physicality by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

      is that what you do on your spare time. Watch Dr. Phil! I hear you men. I am with you on that one. My wife takes the remote and puts Dr. Phil. If I change she doesn't boss me around, she just whines and whines until she gets what she wants.

    128. Re:Physicality by Otis2222222 · · Score: 0
      This is exactly the point. It's easy for "The Experts" to predict that DVD is dead, but there isn't a set top box or distribution system in place that you can even buy, let alone that has a prayer of being as ubiquitous and cheap as a DVD player. Sure, you can build one yourself but people willing to do that represent a fraction of the market. Even a DVR built into your cable/satellite reciever isn't going to get the job done with today's storage limits (namely the cost of a substantial number of 8.4 Gigabyte chunks of space to hold a DVD's worth of information).

      Then you have the HDTV factor. Today's DVD players output 480 lines of resolution, and tomorrow's HDTV movie distribution system are going to deliver 1920x1080! I don't know what that is going to do to the storage needs but I assume it will be quite a difference!

      Bottom line here is that we have a long way to go until something like this comes to fruition. I doubt it will be in the next 5 years. Maybe not even in the next 10.

    129. Re:Physicality by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
      I'm similar. I don't buy DVD's, I don't buy CD's and I rarely buy computer games (direct2drive). But I do buy books. It's because a paper book is a fundamentally different experience than a screen based ebook.

      I've come up with a good way to handle my dead tree addiction though. I buy a big pallet of books off eBay. Generally it's about £150 (~300 dollars) for 1500 books which is about as many as will fit on a pallet. I then spend an entertaining few hours picking out the ones that are my taste which is normally 50-100 of the books. I then put the rest back on eBay. Normally it means that my books cost me around 5 to 10 pence each, sometimes I make a profit!

      Of course I still buy individual books that interest me.

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    130. Re:Physicality by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hey, music files have pretty much killed of cd's for me. Hell, the last piece of physical music I bought was an H. P. Lovecraft album (vinyl). Some used music places have no idea what they have.

      As storage space drops in price, I'll be able to have my movie collection stored like my music. I just priced out a house media server that could handle my collection (~200 DVD's). Would be around $5k for what I want. Not too bad, especially as I'm going to try to roll the cost into my new house building plan.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    131. Re:Physicality by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      I am sure that most people would rather look at a menu which will give access to thousands of movies than look through several shelves of dvds to locate a particular movie among maybe hundreds of dvds. I am sure that the former will take less than 10% of time and will probably cost less than 10% of the cost. I am sure that the vast majority of the movies people possess are not watched more than twice at most. There will be no need for the huge amount of space those movies take up too. There will be no danger to the consumer of loss through either theft or damage from misuse or fire. Equipment with no moving parts on average will last alot longer too. Taking everything into account I am sure that the vast majority of people will download rather than possess.

    132. Re:Physicality by thundercatslair · · Score: 0

      I don't know about that, I have a xbox with XBMC as my dashboard and I find it is the only way I can watch movies or TV anymore. I just download the movies or TV shows and like 5 secs later I'm watching it. I own DVDs too but I never watch them, I don't care about extras or the case. It is just so much easier to watch these movies, I think this is the future of movies.

    133. Re:Physicality by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Hang them from a string and twirl them in a sunbeam. Cool!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    134. Re:Physicality by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Insightful

      6: I have the right to watch that movie as many times as I want, for as long as the DVD exists (decades).

      7: I can watch the movie without some 3rd party knowing I'm watching the movie.

      8: I can resell the movie if I don't like it or if I grow tired of it.

      9: I can lend the movie to my friends.

      10: We can watch 3 different movies in 3 different rooms at the same time without fear of running out of bandwidth.

      11: It is easier for my 2-year-old to choose a movie by looking at physical cases than by browsing things virtually in a computer.

      12: The movies are explicitly protected by my home-owner's insurance from theft or wholesale damage, because it is tangible. What happens when some .com that you purchases online movie rights through disappears? Who knows.

      13: The movie is protected from editing (including censorship, for countries like China). Imagine if the only versions of Star Wars (original trilogy) you could access were the "special editions", because that is the only thing Lucas wants you to see.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    135. Re:Physicality by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Will all boobies get digitized and become virtual entities for our pleasure? Only time will tell...

      I don't know, but if there are any tests being done in this field, I'd like to volunteer...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    136. Re:Physicality by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      You also have to keep in mind that most MPEG4 videos on the P2P networks were all compressed from DVD's. That equates to compressing an already compressed video.

      I'd wager that if the powers that be wanted to adopt MPEG4 and would do the compression from an original uncompressed source, then we'd get MPEG4 video that is even closer in quality to DVD.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    137. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Buy a book with cash and you are doubleplusnogood suspect.

      That's actually doubleplusUNgood. Haven't you seen the NewSpeak 8th edition yet?

    138. Re:Physicality by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      GIS for 'boobies'. Hmmm...looks pretty natural to me. NSFW

      'Course I doubt everyone has the same definition of good-looking. Lets hear it for floppy boobed, hairy hippie chicks with wide hips! NSFW

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    139. Re:Physicality by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      >Also women on the Internet are much easier, they've no qualms with getting fucked in the arse by someone they've only just met.

      Dude, it's a MOVIE. A film. Not the Real Thing (TM). Etc...

      Those models wouldn't give you the time of day if they met you on the street, the only reason they seem so "willing" is that they are being paid well for their "services"

      It's called reality, look into it.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    140. Re:Physicality by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I disagree with the premise until the next major leap forward in broadband speeds. I'm sorry, but it's been years since DSL and cable internet started becoming commonplace in homes and offices. There have been advances in wireless networking, but for the most part the speed of the internet has stayed relatively constant. And at these speeds, full length feature films are still too large to be more convenient than just popping a DVD in and pressing play.

      Wake me up when Abilene starts becoming the new standard .. then I might be convinced.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    141. Re:Physicality by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      The people that don't buy CD's anymore are the ones who are downloading MP3's for free.


      Not all of us. I've only d/l'd one .mp3 off a news group, back in 97 or 98, when the format was just taking off (opening song from Conan the Barbarian ST). Once storage prices dropped and iTunes came along and made archiving cd's easily, I ripped my collection and then started adding to it with various pay services.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    142. Re:Physicality by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      There is something more rewarding about having an LP or a CD as opposed to pointing to a folder which represents a a few sectors of your hard drive...

      Granted, there is value of a physical LP, but I would believe that fewer than 1% of the US population believes there is some kind of value to a CD.

      For LPs, things are different. You have a large 12"x12" cover with good artwork. There are different colored vinyl releases. Typically, the quality of both the physical record and sleeve degrades with time and misuse, so older records that are in better shape have more value. Sometimes there are posters or other goodies in records.

      CDs have none of these features. Most people I know don't even keep the cases and "artwork" that come with the CDs. They put the CDs in CD cases, and thats it. The only CDs that I know of that were tried to be collector items were the first issues of the Beatle's White Album where they stamped some number on them. I have not heard that these are any kind of collector item at all. I have seen an imported White Album from Russia that was on white vinyl that sold for $30 to $50 10 or 15 years ago, that was cool. Personally, I sold my While Album CD to someone when I was broke so that I could get some money to see the Grateful Dead.

      I no longer own any vinyl. As far as a collector item, I think vinyl is cool. As far as a musical reproduction item, I think vinyl sucks. Yeah, there are arguments that vinyl can sound better than CD. I'll give you that much with no rebuttal. However, vinyl has so many things against it for playback, I don't find its worth the time or effort. Records do not fit into my car stereo, they do not fit in my boom box, they do not fit into my other portable items like a CD does. A record at most has like 25 or so minutes of music on one side before you have to physically get up off of the couch and flip the thing over. Want to skip a track on an album? Again you have to get off the couch and carefully lift the needle and go to the next track (yes, I know there are a minority of turntables that can almost always skip to the next track, I've owned one). Want to copy the record so that you can put it on your computer or another portable device or make a mix? Its not easy. At the very minimum it will take realtime to achieve the transcription to another medium. Vinyl and children do not mix.

      I could probably give another half dozen or so reasons.

      Don't get me wrong LPs are cool, and I love looking at someone's record collection and go to record shops and whatnot. I doubt I will ever love looking at someone's CD collection. I doubt that it was ever thought of with the advent of CDs that they were going to be basically worthless pieces of aluminum and plastic, but this has happened. I have probably bought maybe 5 CDs in the past 3 years. Most if not all of them were gifts for my father. I download live (legal) shows off of the internet and burn them to CD at a rate higher than I can afford disk space for. Sometimes I would like to have studio quality recordings for a change. But I cannot afford to buy CDs at my rate of appetite, nor is there enough material out there. I am much more likely to buy a music DVD than an audio CD. That is worth my time and money, and I get more value from it.

      CDs are dead.

    143. Re:Physicality by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      My only qualm with Dr. Phil is his annoying always-talking-too-loud-saying-the-most-obvious-st uff-over-and-over-again style.

      Honestly, I think it should take someone of nominal intelligence 15-20 minutes to "get" Dr. Phil.

      After that, it's really far too repetitive and obvious, but yet millions watch him day after day...

      I suppose it keeps 'em out of trouble, so good job, Dr. Phil.

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    144. Re:Physicality by karnal · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of people who COULD tell the difference. There is really no issue if someone who doesn't care listens to a 128kbit mp3 and is happy with the sound quality.

      Really, I am pretty anal about how I encode my music for my portable player. However, I think there are more people out there who would just be happy to "have" the music rather than have it in the original format. The real shocker is that more and more, it's the people who aren't technical or sound-quality concerned that are getting mp3's off of the internet.

      Which I see as a good thing. The bigger the target, the harder it is for the MPAA/RIAA to take us all down.

      Wow. That wasn't even where I intended to go with this post.... oh well.

      --
      Karnal
    145. Re:Physicality by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's physicality. I have a hard time reading on screens, and I've yet to see a compelling e-book handheld with the same resolution as print, that I can read for six hours, that has the same classical feeling as flipping pages back and forth. For some things, it might work, but nothing beats curling up with a good book and a mug of hot chocolate by the fire and digging into a good novel.

    146. Re:Physicality by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

      You think you will get to keep that downloaded copy?

      You will 'rent' access to view it as many times as you like (as long as it under 5 times) for 30 days.

      They will add broadcast flag and digital signatures to make sure do you copy it or try to view it with out paying for it.

      Everyone will want there cut ever time you watch the 'Debbie does....' collection.

      Then will come pop up ads!

      --
      My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    147. Re:Physicality by no+haters · · Score: 1

      Uh, you need to clarify that statement a bit. IIRC (I moved away 6 months ago) the super-duper freebox service from free.fr was only available in large metropolitan areas... basically Paris, and even then, not the entire city, just the majority of it. France is a lot more than just Paris. Your statement is the equivalent of me saying "Here in the US we have optimum online, which is 10mbps down and 4mbps up for only $XX a month", when in fact it is only available to customers in the Tri-State area that cablevision serves.

    148. Re:Physicality by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I don't think too many people are terribly impressed with the collection of Star Wars "New Jedi Order" series in our house. Fortunately, my wife is the SW freak, and who else do I need to impress?

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    149. Re:Physicality by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      14: You can _watch_ the movie, period. I mean: you are not dependent on the availability/goodwill/not-out-of-businessness of the other party. No hassle.Plus: you don't care about the emergence of new possibly better standards. You have the media and the gear.

    150. Re:Physicality by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      eBooks COULD have taken over the world, but technology is holding them back

      imho the people's love for browsing sheets of paper is holding them back.

    151. Re:Physicality by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DVD's have the advantages of online systems without the associated disadvantages. You can easily rip your DVD's to your local video server and retain the original as a nicely packaged backup. You will be able to browse and play your purchased DVD's online from your local video server and still have your library of physical discs. What's not to like?

      Eveything needed for this is in place except for cheap terabyte drives which are inevitable and not very far away. Online distribution and HD-DVD will both be hamstrung by odious DRM and will never get off the ground. For comparison consider the attempts at replacing the CD with SACD and DVD-Audio.

    152. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13: The movie is protected from editing (including censorship, for countries like China). Imagine if the only versions of Star Wars (original trilogy) you could access were the "special editions", because that is the only thing Lucas wants you to see.

      Although I do understand your point, using the original Star Wars movies on a pro DVD remark is much less meaningful since they've never been released in their original unedited form on DVD.

    153. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as people have as atrocious grammar as you do I can understand why you dislike reading computer screens.

    154. Re:Physicality by Squirmy+McPhee · · Score: 1
      No, CDs will not die off. At least not quite yet. There is something more rewarding about having an LP or a CD as opposed to pointing to a folder which represents a a few sectors of your hard drive in such an order that they can play 'Blueberry Hill'.

      For me, it's more about DRM. I would be happy to buy music online, but I want to be able to listen to it when I want, where I want, on whatever device I want, without having to break laws, risk rendering the file unplayable while removing the DRM, or buy the same music more than once. And while I could always buy from AllofMP3.com, I'm a little wary of sending my credit card number to Russia (though, come to think of it, Aeroflot and a couple of shops in the Moscow airport have it...).

      Of course, the music industry will soon distribute DRM on its CDs, at which point I will have to choose between being an unscrupulous lawbreaker, not spending money on music, and sending my credit card number to Russia.

    155. Re:Physicality by Peaked · · Score: 2

      15. You can always rip it and store it on your hard drive.

      Unbreakable DRM is a myth.

    156. Re:Physicality by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > the glass was almost empty
      I'd say it was a little full.

      > if I applied the same force in crumpling a book as it'd take for my PDA to flex at all it'd rip the book in half

      What B.S., I challenge you to tear a book in half, Superman.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    157. Re:Physicality by pianophile · · Score: 1

      Optical media is subject to a decay called "CD Rot", which essentially means that it has a shelf life of ~10 years.

      I own a copy of one of the first commerially released CDs, Glenn Gould's Goldberg Variations, released by Sony in 1982. It still plays perfectly after ~23 years. Other than storing it in its case, I have done nothing extraordinary to extend its life.

      I have other 80's CDs, too, and all of them still work. YMMV, I suppose, but that 10-year lifespan figure doesn't jibe with my experience.

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
    158. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is funny, because everyone said mp3 downloading wouldn't have an impact on CD sales.

      I knew it wasn't true when the thieves were trying to justify their actions then, but it seems funny that you say it now.

      Since you are buying (presumably) your mp3's now, and not CD's, we can assume if you could still download them as easy as it used to be, you wouldn't be buying mp3's or CDs.

    159. Re:Physicality by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I am sure that the former will take less than 10% of time and will probably cost less than 10% of the cost.

      Nah, the movie studios will charge you the same for them, and wont allow you to record them into a physical medium... Have you compared prices of VHS tapes and DVDs lately? How do you compare that with the costs of production of both media?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    160. Re:Physicality by smelroy · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. I still like to have the CD and just convert that to MP3 or whatever other format I want. I think eventually I will do the same with my DVD collection so that I have fast access to all of my movie and TV series collection. Now all I need is a much, much larger HD, HDTV, and a media pc.

      --
      Switching to Linux can be an adventure!
    161. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The laserdisk rip is widely available in the web. The instructions on how to build DVDs from those rips are also widely available.

      I own 3 legitimate versions of the Star Wars Trilogy... Im not buying them again, just to have them on DVD

    162. Re:Physicality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Yeah...what are people going to put there movies on after they download them?

      I'd rather have a couple of backups on physical medium rather than trust a hard drive...not only that...what about bringing movies with you to friend's homes..etc. Who wants to lug a computer everywhere you want to watch a movie?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    163. Re:Physicality by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A rip of VHS into MPEG2 is going to last a lot longer than the VHS original.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    164. Re:Physicality by Abreu · · Score: 1

      You are correct. The guitar parts played by Ralph Maccios character were played by Ry Cooder (RIP)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    165. Re:Physicality by kypper · · Score: 1

      No, but they'd rather watch it from a 52" plasma than a 21" monitor.

      Plus, most would rather invest in a nice TV and a DVD player rather than having to hook their computer to their TV through an output card.

    166. Re:Physicality by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      DVDs do the same thing though. I don't remember what I was watching, but it was prefixed by 5 minutes of unskippable ads. My DVD player wouldn't let me jump past it. Now, I could go the "illegal" route and rip the movie and reauthor it to a new disc, but I don't want to be a criminal just to avoid commercials on DVDs I bought.

    167. Re:Physicality by DCheesi · · Score: 1

      13: The movie is protected from editing (including censorship, for countries like China). Imagine if the only versions of Star Wars (original trilogy) you could access were the "special editions", because that is the only thing Lucas wants you to see.

      Uhh, bad example, dude. This is already the case with the StarWards DVDs. If anything the download mechanism gives you more opportunity to get the unauthorized versions (albeit illegally). Now for movies that you already own before the re-edits, your point would be valid...

    168. Re:Physicality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I think "real" books are going to be with us for a while, but other printed materials like magazine and newspapers will largely get replaced in the near future."

      I think most all printed media will be with us for awhile. I read a LOT every day...via computer, but, things I need to keep or refer to...I print them off. For example, on Oracle upgrades, patches...I always have printed copies..that I can check off and make notes on. Casual reading to pass time, sure, computer is nice, but, I see the reality of a 'paperless society' is far from ever happening in my lifetime. I find I'd much rather have paper copies of things to read, especially of things I'd refer back to....and do print them out rather than keep referring to the same website.

      You just can't always count on the webpage being there forever, nor having the network up and running when you need that info...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    169. Re:Physicality by McCart42 · · Score: 1
      The problem is that there just isn't much good music left; almost all music produced lately is crap.


      Your statement reminds me of the patent commissioner in 1899 saying "Everything that can
      be invented has been invented."

      Come on - it's not ALL crap. Maybe all RIAA music, fine, but there are tons of great indie albums out there. Listen to The Books' "The Lemon of Pink" lately? Death Cab for Cutie? Godspeed You! Black Emperor? Carbon Leaf? The Delgados? Boards of Canada? Look, the bands I've mentioned are my idea of good music and they might not match your tastes. But read Pitchfork's online reviews every now and then, you'll find some good indie music that you might like if you gave it a chance.
      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    170. Re:Physicality by rizzo420 · · Score: 1

      that's a part of it too. also, the majority of the population (a very large majority in fact), has no idea what an ebook is. the same thing goes for mp3 and divx (with it being a small majority that doesn't know what an mp3 is).

      but honestly, even if they knew what ebooks were, i still believe the majority would prefer actual books because they're easier to read, regardless of what they feel about the worth of it.

      --
      please me, have no regrets.
    171. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I forgot you gringos live off your debts...

      "Sure I could buy less CDs/DVDs, but since its so easy to get a third mortage here, Ill go for it"

      Sorry if I sound like Frank Grimes, its just that sometimes I dont understand americans...

    172. Re:Physicality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "when in fact it is only available to customers in the Tri-State area that cablevision serves."

      Ok...I know where Paris, France is...where is the 'tri-state' area you speak of? Never heard of that....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    173. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      We can watch 3 different movies in 3 different rooms at the same time without fear of running out of bandwidth.

      Wow, you have 3 rooms in your parents' basement.

    174. Re:Physicality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Amazon is easier to use than a library. Itunes is easier to use than waiting for Amazon CDs. All the economic pointers suggest an Itunes offering quick movie downloads will kill DVD purchases."

      I dunno. I'd take a CD over iTunes anyday of the week. I'd rather purchase music, that hasn't been degraded in quality (lossy) before I even get it. And if iTunes puts out movies that are highly compressed more than a DVD...I'd not be interested in that either.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    175. Re:Physicality by danbond_98 · · Score: 1

      Where there's a will there's a bored geek just waiting for a new challenge to solve. That and you can just factor in that time for going and doing something useful, making a sandwich, etc. 20 minutes you've not wasted, so who care if the ads are skippable.

    176. Re:Physicality by Cabriel · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall someone making this claim about MP3s, stating that with broadband and higher bandwidths, it would be more efficient to send the uncompressed .wav files and keep the (near-)perfect sound instead of using compression and sacrificing realism and clarity.

    177. Re:Physicality by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "1) The average non-audiophile will never be able to tell the difference between a 128kbit stereo mp3 and a CD. Napster or Itunes might not be suitable to someone who has a $1000 speaker system, but for someone like me or Joe Sixpack, buying songs over a digital medium, where a) you don't have to leave your house and b) you don't have to wait more than about 10 seconds to start listening to the first track, is damn convenient."

      $1000 for speakers? That's not much money...$500 each (assuming only stereo). Anything that level isn't much of a system...more of a glorified jam box.

      Damn...do people not put much value in a good stereo these days? I'm not talking $10K+ or anything...but, surely not everyone is satisified with some POS from Walmart....if that is the new standard for stereos, then sure, now I can understand why people buy lossy recorded music, and say they can't tell the difference.

      I'm a bit older now, but, I started building my stereo since I was 12...over the years, buying, adding, improving, till I have what I've always wanted...and it does sound great.

      Does the youth of today, which generally has more spending money than I did at that age, not put much value into a GOOD sound system....one where you CAN hear the difference?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    178. Re:Physicality by rmayes100 · · Score: 1

      11: It is easier for my 2-year-old to choose a movie by looking at physical cases than by browsing things virtually in a computer.

      I had the same issue when my kids were a little younger, but by the time one of my kids was 3 and 1/2 though he was already starting to read. His main motivation for doing so? He wanted to be able to find his favorite cartoons in the program guide on our satellite receiver. It's important for kids to learn the freedom that being able to read gives them above and beyond just being able to read books (reading signs, packages of food, text on the television etc...), it helps give them that extra little motivation to learn their letters and numbers and begin to recognize words.

    179. Re:Physicality by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I think you meant: Last Generation ;)

      --
      No Comment.
    180. Re:Physicality by nkuzmik · · Score: 1
      Price and availability of the E-book readers will be an impediment.

      Let me put it tis way, when writing a paper, I have will have my sources layed out around me on whatever horizontal surface is available. I think it's going to be a while before any E-book system can open another document, on a specific page, faster than I can move my eyeball. I also underline, circle, highlight, and flag the books I'm working with.

      Based on what I've said so far, any slashdotter could go to my shelf, grab my copy of Norton's Anthology of British Literature, flip through and with a reasonable degree of confidence figure out which documents I have read, and take an educated guess at those that I have for a paper.

      Okay, I've strayed a bit.
      My original point was that I like to be able to spread my material out. You can't do that on a computer or an E-book reader. You can have dual, or even triple monitors, but that doesn't help when you are working with 15 sources.

      Okay, that went rather far afield of the topic, which was DVD's vs some form of broadband delivered movie... My thoughts on that... Lemme get back to you on that.

    181. Re:Physicality by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and besides.. Who is going to stream old episodes of the Beverly Hillbillies, the Donna Reed Show, or my personal favorite: "My Mother the Car"?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    182. Re:Physicality by lgw · · Score: 1

      I am sure that most people would rather look at a menu which will give access to thousands of movies than look through several shelves of dvds to locate a particular movie among maybe hundreds of dvds.

      Nah, then what would you display on your wall? A similar thing has happened with academic publications: I seem to recall that the WWW was invented for academic publication, but it doesn't seem to have caught on well in that area. I've been told by more than one professor that this is because there's status associated with the number of journals on the bookshelves in one's office.

      I like books for that reason myself - life feels better to me when I have a physical library. Of course, as it threatens to exceed one room, I start to see the appeal of digital ...

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    183. Re:Physicality by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1

      Meh... they aren't paying well enough for ME to take it from a 10" stranger. There's something to be said for good old-fashioned sluts...

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    184. Re:Physicality by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd *love* to see a denser medium for DVDs: something audio-cassette sized with no seperate case and no fragile media. But I'm perfectly happy buying media for just the reasons listed here.

      I don't think DVDs are the final format for movies, we'll see something where HDTV resolution and DTS quality sound are the standard, but I don't think the new format will be "just bits".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    185. Re:Physicality by lgw · · Score: 1

      Current e-books are garbage ergonomically IMO, but it's early days still. Some sort of e-paper that has the size and weight of a book with minimal power consumption so you're not worried about the batteries running down, and cheap eough where it's not a tragedy if it's lost or broken would do the trick.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    186. Re:Physicality by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm no video expert, but from my understanding, there's no reason why MPEG4 can't have better quality than DVD, provided it is encoded directly from the uncompressed source (as DVD was). MPEG2 is simply an older, inferior codec.

      MPEG4/DivX has a bad reputation because it's mostly used for P2P stuff, which is compressing already-compressed stuf as you pointed out, and also is used at lower bitrates to keep the overall size more manageable for downloading.

      If someone wanted to make a DVD disc with MPEG4 content, they could probably have higher resolution, better quality, and more time than any regular DVD. Of course, no normal DVD player could play it...

      I've also heard that the satellite TV providers are thinking of switching from MPEG2 to MPEG4 because they can squeeze more video into their bandwidth allotment.

    187. Re:Physicality by operagost · · Score: 1

      I could print (most) ebooks to paper and read them, but even disregarding the printing cost I wouldn't do so because I actually do enjoy having the book. Otherwise, I would be trading in a lot more of them at the used book store. I like having the good ones around: call me weird.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    188. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you print out the book and staple the pages together? Doesn't that defeat the purpose of choosing an eBook over a physical book? And think about all that ink...

    189. Re:Physicality by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      Well this is true, but when you're a major fan of reading you can go a bit far on this; in our house there are five full-height bookshelves and five half-height, and no order whatsoever.

      It's not impressive so much as it is insane... and that's why it sometimes would be nice just to fit a few thousand paperbacks onto a CD.

    190. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      16. Profit

    191. Re:Physicality by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Your statement reminds me of the patent commissioner in 1899 saying "Everything that can
      be invented has been invented."


      But my statement is totally different. I didn't say that no one can make any more good music, it's just that they don't.

      You guys might be right: there could be some indie music out there that I'll like. I have looked around some, however, and just haven't found anything that interested me enough to bother buying it. Maybe I'll have to spend some more time looking when I get some free time.

      It's not all crap, however; I still like the recent albums by Dream Theater and Iron Maiden (both RIAA-affiliated, unfortunately). But these bands have been around since the 80's and 70's, respectively.

      One new way I've found of learning of different bands is to sign up for Audioscrobbler.
      I use AmaroK, a media player for KDE, which has Audioscrobbler linkage built-in in the newest release. It sends statistics on everything you play to Audioscrobbler, which builds statistics based on that, and then matches you up with other people who have similar tastes in music. This way, you can look at what your "musical neighbors" listen to, and check out their favorite bands.

      However, as for downloading music and listening before buying, I've cut that out lately because of the torrent (pardon the pun) of lawsuits from the RIAA for this activity. I used to do this more 5 years ago and bought new music this way, but not anymore.

      Maybe I should spend more time with my notebook computer, using its wireless connection to download P2P material through other people's networks...

    192. Re:Physicality by Progman3K · · Score: 1

      >There's something to be said for good old-fashioned sluts...

      And that something is - AMEN!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    193. Re:Physicality by jonsequeira · · Score: 1

      Despite all the stated fragility of books, I will bet you any commodity you care to name, in any quantity, that most of my books will still be functional long after your PDA. Simply put, the more places at which the process required for the item to be usable might break down -- delivery via communications link, format obsolescence, vendors going out of business -- the more fragile the item is.

    194. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It occurs to me that the psychology that ties value to physical items whose real content is available in an "intangible" format may be gone in one or two generations. We're the generation that grew up used to getting movies, music and text content on physical media. So much's changed in a short time. 30 years from now people might not understand why we didn't immediately throw out all our books and DVDs once content became available online.

    195. Re:Physicality by matt+me · · Score: 1

      > 6: I have the right to watch that movie as many times as I want, for as long as the DVD exists (decades).
      Even if they do last that long, the ones you'll soon be getting from your Blockbuster store (if it isn't killed by broadband delivery or postal rental) certainly won't. I read in NewScientist recently about a patent for DVDs that will turn to goo after reacting with air. You get the DVD through the post, watch it, next week it's dust. How's that for a waste of resources? Probably cheaper than bandwidth though.

      See destructing-DVDs (NewScientist)
      http://www.newscientist.com/articl e.ns?id=mg177237 82.500

    196. Re:Physicality by farmhick · · Score: 1

      For me, it isn't so much "the look of paper", it's the physical aspects of a book I can't do without. If confused at a certain plot twist, I can easily flip back to a previous page, and re-read a line, while not loosing my current place, because my finger is holding the pages open. I don't have to try to guess what page number to turn to, just how far into the story I think I have to look. And I can easily read a line on the previous page, then a line on the current page that is causing the confusion, then the previous line again, etc. until I get it right in my mind.

      I can flip back one page and read the whole thing, knowing exactly that that is the previous page, and knowing exactly where on the current page to jump back to.

      If an e-book has that ability, I would consider using one to read something. But not if it is just a simplified Palm Pilot or TabletPC, ie single flat screen that can only show one page at a time, or worse if it scrolls at all.

      I just now spent 5 minutes googling for ebook devices, and my worst fears were right. Most of the devices are nothing more than Palm Pilots, some are tablet PC style. One was actually a two-page reader that could almost make the cut. Maybe I should claim patent rights to a "Multi-Leaf Electronic Book Device" that uses several LCD sheets so I can 'flip' through them as I described above.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
    197. Re:Physicality by farmhick · · Score: 1

      said Drakonite:
      "crumple pages etc of it up" ... if I applied the same force in crumpling a book as it'd take for my PDA to flex at all it'd rip the book in half.

      Really??? You have used your PDA as a step when you needed a couple inches more reach? And the LCD screen didn't crack at all? You must have the Knight Rider 2000 version of the Palm Pilot.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
    198. Re:Physicality by farmhick · · Score: 1

      The place would have to have a registered nurse on duty as well. One who can insert a catheter.

      No, not for me, for my wife. She has to pee about every 20 minutes when we are watching a movie.

      So, a discreet waitress to get us food and beverage, a catheter for my wife to remove the beverage, and a comfortable chair with restraints so that my wife doesn't do her other movie-enjoyment-destroying bit, washing dishes. Because she can't sit and watch a movie if there are dirty dishes in the sink.

      Hey, I like this idea of yours. I would care to invest in this project with you. Please post your bank acount numbre so that I may send my payment to you quinkly. Also, my uncle would like to here of this, I will forward his replie soon; once it is tomorrow in Nigeria.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
    199. Re:Physicality by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      After reading (rather listening to the audiobook) the book "Blink", I've been looking to try something like this. The reason is the breakdown of the Pepsi challenge and a variation that really IS difficult.

      The author took 3 glasses (rather than 2) and asks the taster to choose the 1 that's different. It turns out that this is WAY harder than it ought to be. Despite the participants' assertions that they were sure they could tell the difference between Pepsi and Coke, it didn't turn out that way and people were only "right" 33% of the time or the same as blind luck. Despite their "expertise", they really aren't able to tell the difference.

      Once I move later this month and get my audio setup up and running in the new house, I may give this a shot with my friends. A playlist of 2 MP3's and a WAV of the same song and the reverse: 2 WAV and 1 MP3 and see how easy it actually is to tell the difference.

      There's far too little blind testing of things like this in audio equipment.

    200. Re:Physicality by LetterJ · · Score: 1

      "Damn...do people not put much value in a good stereo these days?"

      It's pretty much a "law" that there are multiple items in your house that I or other posters would react the same way you react to a cheap stereo. And, unless you have unlimited funds, you're going to focus on a few things and this is going to be true for everyone.

      For instance, is your car a "good" car with "good" performance setup?

      Do you settle for 35mm or sub 8 megapixel camera equipment instead of medium format slide film?

      Did your main cooking skillet cost less than $200 or your main chef's knife cost less than $300?

      Do you sleep on a sub-$1000 mattress?

      Is any of the furniture in your house made by Sauder or any other "assemble-at-home" company instead of hand crafted, quartersawn oak?

      Is your lawn perfectly manicured without a single weed?

      Is your computer completely up to date or do you make due with a 2-3 year old model?

      For every one of those questions there are quite a few people who would say, "Don't people value their (furniture|cooking equipment|photography gear, etc) these days" and be talking about you or me in one or more of those categories.

      People spend their money proportionally to their interests and priorities. Switch out lists of priorities and you'll get an entirely different ratio of spending.

    201. Re:Physicality by triso · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way; except that my D&D games and impressive dice collection define my personality. That and the fact that I live in me mumm's basement and still don't have a job at age 31.

    202. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters, because if I have paid money for the disk, then I should be able to skip over the advertising. It matters, because if I've just purchased the disk then I don't know that I'm going to have to waste 5 minutes watching pointless menu animations and unskippable ads - I can't plan for what I don't know about. And anyway, the whole idea of having to plan to wait a few minutes to watch something that I have purchased is just ludicrous. Part of the point of buying something is to be able to watch when I want, without having to wait for commercials.

      It's the principle of it.

    203. Re:Physicality by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      thats not a bad idea. In my current state of underemplyment it'll be a way to pass the time. Although I probably don't have the space for it...

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    204. Re:Physicality by mcaycedo · · Score: 1

      Well, about the value of 0 and 1sss... You trust all your hard earned movie to a bank, and the bank writes in their books, that you "Joe SixPack" are the happy owner of $$$$$$. But, oh surprise, where the bank maintains all their records: in the intangible and volatile memory of a computer.

      So, you are already trusting in the 0 and 1sss maintained for the bank

    205. Re:Physicality by sehnsucht0x90 · · Score: 1

      You haven't bought a book lately have you?

      and you havent bought a PDA lately have you?

    206. Re:Physicality by Aquamouth · · Score: 0

      I have to agree on that topic. Books are so much better than reading from the computer screen. You don't need electricity. You can read it while in the bathtub and you can curl up in bed. I think I might just read a book now. Perhaps I will start with Diagnosis by Alan P. Lightman.

      --
      und das ist alle fur jetz
    207. Re:Physicality by Marvelicious · · Score: 1

      Ha, now that was actually a really good movie... despite the Karate chump! Really pissed me off when Britney came out with a movie by the same title...

      --
      Send whiskey and fresh horses!
    208. Re:Physicality by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      Besides, it's too early to replace DVD. It took about 20 years for anything to really take down VHS, and VHS sales were going down the drain anyway.

      As far as I'm concerned all this HD TV and DVD stuff is too soon and too under-spec'd. Should have really thought it out better before releasing DVD in the first place, because it's going to be hard to displace now, especially with the increased levels of DRM bullshit.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    209. Re:Physicality by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Just get a new auto play dvd player, there is a cheap lg unit that skips everything and starts at the beginning of the movie, just insert the disc and it does the rest. As for online streaming replacing dvd's, never happen. When the mass market buy something they want to have something tangible to show for their investment as well as show off to their friends.

      Blue ray is iffy depending on how well they protect the disc from damage, how stable the storage medium is and how well balanced the disc has to be before you have reading problems. Solid state (polymer chips) are more likely, less power and player components can be embeded into the storage medium (high security). Not that they wont try to dump blue ray on unsuspecting consumers, just like they did with large low-res plasma screens.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    210. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot lazy mods.

      Read the grandparent of the parent.

      Yeah, when people stop being interested in physical objects.

    211. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do like the idea of reading things off a screen because I hear less screaming trees when I do. :p But books are still good to me for 2 reasons.

      1) Readily portable (no download or powering up or processing required, just pick up and open)
      2) No batteries required.

      On the same reasoning, I live DVD's over streaming for several reason.

      1) I like looking at the plastic disc (ooh... so shiny... so pretty...)
      2) It's their and waiting, despite the condition of my internet.
      3) It won't go away when I turn off my computer (AKA it's tangible)
      4) streaming is like a house of straws and DVD like a house of bricks... straw houses might be fast and easy to build but only until the wolf comes along.
      5) It's a far better archival tool (backup) than transfering yet another 700mb-7gb file to yet another hard drive.
      6) It has a choice, usually, of different audio, subtitles, etc. Meaning, pure audio, pure video, pure subtitle, independent of each other and already backed up.
      7) And the cup coaster option isn't bad.

    212. Re:Physicality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A thought just came to me. Maybe it's less about the money or physical attachment and more about the time and effort invested. To just say that you downloaded 10 movies of X actor or director doesn't say much about how much you like the actor or director or writer. But if you really liked the writer/actor/director, etc, it shows more your admiration that you would take the time out of your life, drive down to a video/dvd store, look for the movie, purchase it and bring it home. More effort/time/money is made on your part to get this movie or that movie over another, and that shows more you love for that movie.

      Who said it here first was right, I am less impressed by someone's mp3 collection than I am by their CD collection. One shows taste and dedication and interest while the other just shows broadband.

    213. Re:Physicality by evilviper · · Score: 1
      And at these speeds, full length feature films are still too large to be more convenient than just popping a DVD in and pressing play.

      Not true at all. You are making the same mistake I see over and over again, comparing your poor P2P experience, with what would be a commercial product.

      Current DSL speeds are close to 1.5Mbps, which is enough for high-quality MPEG-4 video. The next generation of codecs isn't far off either. So, what you can expect, is to select a movie, wait 60 seconds while the video cache is built-up, and then watch the movie. That would be more convient in my book...

      Besides, you should really be comparing it with the entire process of watching a DVD, which includes driving to a store to rent or buy it in the first place.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    214. Re:Physicality by evilviper · · Score: 1
      imho the people's love for browsing sheets of paper is holding them back.

      Yeah, just like people's love for holding a record in their hands, and looking at cover-art is holding back MP3s.

      I don't think there are many people that love holding sheets of paper, I just believe that it's a much less miserable prospect than reading from the digital screens we have at present.

      I know being unable to SEARCH for keywords in any technical book is a major drawback, that ebooks solve. The OTHER limitations of ebooks are preventing the advantages from being worthwhile.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    215. Re:Physicality by evilviper · · Score: 1
      most of my books will still be functional long after your PDA

      I would be happy to take you up on that bet, but under the condition that the PDA gets treated just as well as the books, and is stored in the same environment.

      Though, the issue is moot. The ONLY thing that needs to survive is the digital data of the book... You can store it on whatever media you want, and it will be trivially easy to copy it to newer digital media as necessary. Plus, you are not counting PRICE at all... With a real book as inexpensive as a digital book, you'll be lucky if the paper doesn't rot away in the first few years.

      format obsolescence

      That is the one thing you've listed that's actually relevant, and it should not pose a problem. We are not talking about propritary DRMed eBooks here. ASCII text, HTML, or PDFs are sure to be readable longer than the ink stays on the pages of your books.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    216. Re:Physicality by jonsequeira · · Score: 1

      When I said format obsolescence I meant both hardware and software. Are your 8-tracks still useful? Computer punch cards? How about your relatively new, shiny laser discs? Sure, the ASCII text on your PDA will still be readable, if the screen still works, and the bus still works. I'm saying there are a lot of points of failure.

      As far the PDA's storage medium, it's susceptible to normal background radiation and perhaps design flaws (comparable to the acid in cheap paper) that will cause the data to become corrupt over time. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_error#Causes_of_ Soft_Errors/ If you had an analog PDA that might be tolerable, but digital is a lot more prone to becoming useless due to small errors. Due to limitations in both hardware and software, the digital world has yet to produce a format with anywhere near the potential archival longevity of acid-free rag paper.

    217. Re:Physicality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Someday, with the improvement of "electronic paper", I expect to be able to have a book with pages and all that you can turn, but that you can, with the touch of a stylus, change to be a different book. One thing I'd like to see with such a book is that you could write in it and have the markings be there the next time you load that same book (but also be easily wiped out).

      Still, there's something satisfying about having a real book, that isn't subject to a stupid software flaw that might wipe it out, or a tiny scratch, or EMP. Takes a fire or a flood to destroy it, and even then it can often be rescued.

      Same thing with CDs and DVDs, they're more fragile than books, but better than tape, and less ephemeral than a backup on a hard drive, and actually under your control rather than being at the mercy of someone else if you have to download it each time you want to watch or listen to it.

    218. Re:Physicality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      The biggest drawback to me of non-electronic books is that they aren't searchable, either within the book or over a library of books. For example, I'm reading along and hit a character name that was mentioned once some eight chapters ago - I want to do a quick search to where he was first introduced. Same thing when reading an acronym-heavy article. Searching over multiple books would be nice in a series, or for remembering which story had a particular character, or to do normal research.

    219. Re:Physicality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      I think this boobie is one of the more natural looking ones found by that search!

    220. Re:Physicality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      $100-150 speakers sound just as good as $500 speakers unless you have a pretty good room to set everything up in. Most people set up some speakers in the bedroom and/or the living room, hook it to a $200 amp and a $100 CD or DVD player - if they have 5.1 surround, they're lucky if they have a place to mount the rear speakers that's anywhere near to where they should be (and plenty of them bought the "5.1 SURROUND SOUND COMPLETE HOME THEATER SYSTEM" for $199.99, so why does it matter?). Why would they blow $1000 on a pair of speakers with a setup like that? Besides, by the time most people can afford a house with a listening room and the gear to go in it, they've probably lost enough of their hearing where they can't tell the difference anyway.

    221. Re:Physicality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call 22MHz "far higher frequency than human hearing can detect". Yes, it is beyond the range most people can hear, and even if you can hear it, most people can't tell the difference when it is presented with the rest of the frequencies usually present in music, but it isn't "far higher".

      I'd really like to see any audiophile presented with a test: play their choice of vinyl record over their choice of turntable, pre-amp, equalizer, amp, monster cables, filtered power supplies, speakers - and let an expert record the output at the pre-amp and put it on CD. Then let the audiophile listen again and figure out which is which (with the CD being fed in at the same pre-amp into the same system). I'll bet some could - and they would rightly be called freaks of nature, and totally irrelevant to the world of consumer music.

    222. Re:Physicality by evilviper · · Score: 1
      the digital world has yet to produce a format with anywhere near the potential archival longevity of acid-free rag paper.

      Did you even bother to READ what I wrote?

      The ONLY thing that needs to survive is the digital data of the book... You can store it on whatever media you want, and it will be trivially easy to copy it to newer digital media as necessary.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    223. Re:Physicality by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Now that is a classic boobie. Firm looking, pale (can't stand that orange tanning room look) and alert. Just the way a boobie should be.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    224. Re:Physicality by jonsequeira · · Score: 1

      I read it. It just has nothing to do with your PDA.

  2. Laserdiscs by TWX · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still collect Laserdiscs you insensitive clod!

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Laserdiscs by Suburbanpride · · Score: 4, Interesting
      collect being the key word. Laser discs never caught on beyond big movie fans a hobbiests. back in the arly/mid 90's I knew maybe 3 people who owned laser dsc players. Now I don't know anyone who doesn't own a DVD play.

      I do however, know plenty of people (my parents included) who don't see a need for board band, but still go to blockbuster to rent a dvd every once and a while.

      DVD's aren't going anywhere.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    2. Re:Laserdiscs by bsgk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many people do you know have cable? Boom, done. Everything is there for the digital download of content (all types) straight to the set-top box. Your parent's will never know they have broadband. The will just get the box from the cable company and have full access (PPV or subscription, I don't know, but I like subscription) to Netflix / Blockbuster / movie label content.

    3. Re:Laserdiscs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't to bait, but 1-2 spelling / grammar errors are standard for /., but, come on, what are there, 15?

      Please use the "preview" button!

    4. Re:Laserdiscs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming he'd be able to spot all those errors if he bothered to look for them. Considering the apparent English skills of most Slashdotters, I wouldn't be too surprised if he thought that the opposite of "win" was spelled with three Os and an apostrophe before the S.

      Not to get completely off topic here, but what does "don't to bait" mean? Sounds like a bad babelfish translation. ;)

    5. Re:Laserdiscs by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I used to not know anyone who did not have a VCR, but now most people only have 1 for "legacy" uses. More and more people are getting rid of their VCRs as they convert.

      Five to seven years ago, when DVDs first came out, people didn't understand why they were needed. Then slowly as people saw the quality and other benefits things changed.

      It's not hard for me to believe that something will replace a DVD but broadband seems funny.

      1) Piracy makes content owners distrust it
      2) Broadband transfer speed is not high enough to stream "real-time" at DVD quality for say, a neighborhood of people.
      3) Routing issues such as packet delays, lost packets, etc. require either a substantial amount of buffering or a lot of network engineering to happen, this is something neither cable companies nor telephone companies are incentivized to do.

      I still, maybe uniquely, believe in TiVO or workalikes. The idea that you can "program" your cable box to download OR record stuff you want, so you can watch it when you're ready is pretty nice. Plus you could (in my fantasy) record saved stuff to whatever medium for later use. If HDTV++++ comes out, but a new box that can play your old stuff, plus the new uber content. No more VHS, Beta, DVD, LaserDisc etc. causing us to have to either buy new stuff or keep 2 machines around. I hate keeping my VHS movies but I refuse to buy them again on DVD...

    6. Re:Laserdiscs by Suburbanpride · · Score: 1

      on behalf of slashdot, I would like to appoligize. I blame it on the system, however. I was rushing to get a post before there were 500 others just like mine. I would also like to blame wmy mother, who used to proof read my papers in high school. In college I just turned in bad papers and got bad marks. and now my employer is tuck with an employee who can barely write a decent email. It's the systems fault.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    7. Re:Laserdiscs by Suburbanpride · · Score: 1

      Also, I had ear problems making me effective deaf untill i was 3. It took 13 years of speech thearapy to get to a reasonable level. That of course, doens't effect my writting, but its a good all-pupose excuse.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    8. Re:Laserdiscs by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

      >>I do however, know plenty of people (my parents included) who don't see a need for board band, but still go to blockbuster to rent a dvd every once and a while.

      Ok living in Silicon Valley this might be a bad example, but I've had at most 3 big-chain video rental places (1 Hollywood Video, 2 Blockbuster) within 4 miles of my house, the closest one being the Hollywood Video that was open for maybe two years. The blockbuster that was open for well over a decade, I'm sure longer but I've only lived in this area that long, closed down a couple months ago. Why?

      Granted we were never overly happy with Blockbuster, but the thing that really changed it was getting Sattelite TV, which we've now had for 7 or so years. While not perfect Pay-Per-View on Sattelite TV (DirecTV in this case) tends to be much easier then going to a rental place, and new movies start every half hour anyways, so time is rarely an issue.

      Even more recently when we got a Tivo we would just order the PPV movie, have Tivo grab it and then start watching it back at our leisure, and because its sitting on the Tivo we can watch it back for practically however long we feel like. Most of the movies we rarely watch back more then twice, and even more rarely after the first weekend we get them. If I have enough interest I pick up the DVD.

      And many DVDs for older movies run for around $10 at Fry's, compared to the $6.50 Blockbuster would charge me to rent it for a week. The extra $3.50 was typically more then worth it for me to never have to bother with returning it, not to mention if I ever feel like watching the movie again.

    9. Re:Laserdiscs by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Um, I don't have cable. Neither do my neighbors, or their neighbors. Why? Because we live in one of the many areas of the U.S. where you can't get it. You do realize there are rural areas in the U.S., right?

    10. Re:Laserdiscs by bsgk · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, I never said everyone has cable. I lived in rural Illinois; I know this. Fact is, whether it's cable to the home, fiber to the home, or some massive highspeed WLAN, companies will build devices to supply digital content downloads direct to the user. I think they will go for subscription over PPV because it means a locked-in revenue stream. I was buying VHS 5 years ago, I still buy CDs today, but in the end, digital distribution will replace them all. We all just need to think outside the box. To your point, maybe rural areas will not see it as quickly, but it will happen.

  3. Netcraft by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Netcraft confirms that the DvD is dying.

    1. Re:Netcraft by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 1

      Netcraft confirms Netcraft jokes are dying

    2. Re:Netcraft by affliction · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to believe this until Netcraft actually confirms that DVD is dying. Then we will talk.

      And who the hell is Serge Tchuruk anyway?

  4. BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over half my library is from BT. I haven't bought a dvd since last year.

    1. Re:BT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      Bravo.

  5. I'd disagree. by kjoonlee · · Score: 1

    The calculator didn't phase out the abacus in Asia, and the PDA is still to replace the memopad.

    Unless things start getting *much* more ubiquotous, I'd say the DVD is here to stay much longer.

    PS. First post?

    1. Re:I'd disagree. by cp4 · · Score: 1

      P.S. Not quite?

  6. This is a tough one. by squall14716 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is a tough one.

    Hmm... no.

    1. Re:This is a tough one. by squall14716 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how the hell this is off topic. The summary asked a simple question (Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?), and I gave a simple answer (No).

  7. laserdisks and beta by cyrax777 · · Score: 2, Informative

    it wasnt till about a couple years that Pioneer discountined making LD players and around the same time period Sony stopped supporting beta as well. They were in use for a long time in the proffesional market long after considered dead in the consumer world.

    1. Re:laserdisks and beta by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 1

      Well, eventually, the pros moved over to Digibeta, and Sony still makes all that shit...Their top of the line deck (VCR if you insist) runs $40,000USD. The future is high-def on the DV platform, as far as pro video goes. I don't remember seeing laser disk players lying around post houses at all...I do know they were used in the educational market for a long time.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    2. Re:laserdisks and beta by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I don't remember seeing laser disk players lying around post houses at all.

      I've seen one or two, but they weren't very common. Also, iirc, one of the earliest prototype NLEs (was it editdroid?) used custom pressed laser disks.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  8. Maybe.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Everyone I know has at least one DVD. I know nobody who has ever owned a laserdisc.

    If given the choice to pay for and download movies online, I'd be all over it.

    When I buy a game or a movie at a store I download it at home, because it's easier to mount an image than find and insert a CD or a DVD.

    It's so much easier to manage files on my computer than CDs and DVDs in meatspace.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    1. Re:Maybe.. by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      So what happens when your hard drive inevitably crashes?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Maybe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you pay money for the media if you're going to break the law anyway?

    3. Re:Maybe.. by Purdah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If given the choice to pay for and download movies online, I'd be all over it."

      And I suspect that the movie companies would be all over you too, or would that be own you, as you would be one of the first to accept the fact that on-line movies will have DRM written all over it....

    4. Re:Maybe.. by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      I don't know about him, but I restore from backup. If that's gone, the original media is pristine in its case, rather than all scratched up from repeated use. Works well, I think...

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    5. Re:Maybe.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Is it breaking the law to download something you own?

      I purchased the game/movie. I want easier access to my files.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    6. Re:Maybe.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I can live with DRM, as long as it can be removed. And there's always a way to remove it.

      I use the iTMS all the time, and have a copy of jhymn.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  9. CDs aren't dead... by jxyama · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...and music/audio are already much more widely dissiminated in digital form, legal or otherwise, today.

    i guess it's "hip" to try to be a visionary by predicting an early death of something.

    1. Re:CDs aren't dead... by nmoog · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the CD-ROM Acronym joke that circulated way back when...

      Q. What does CD-ROM stand for?
      A. Consumer Device - Rendered Obsolete in Months.

      Who needed CD's now that we had Zip disks? 100 megabytes, and rewriteable!

  10. Dinosaurs eventually get replaced by faster mice. by PxM · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be generalized to include other things like TV and radio? Radio is currently being replaced by webcasts for those who listen to it at work and home. If enough major metro areas implement WiFi access (which they will eventually) then people would be able to get radio that way too. The Internet and distributed communications technology in general will pretty much be the end of all classic media delivery systems once broadband really takes off and people can stream near realtime HDTV level video.

    --
    Free iPod? Try a free Mac Mini
    Or a free Nintendo DS, GC, PS2, Xbox
    Wired article as proof

  11. Netflicks by wpiman · · Score: 0
    I recently saw an interview with the starters of Netflicks. They were talking about competition in the marketplace.

    The did not fear Walmart- or BlockBuster entering their space-- but they were seriously concerned about VOD. They saw that as a killer for them.

  12. well not really... by nilbog · · Score: 1
    ...because I'm still using my broadband connection to download DVD rips.

    ahem...legal ones of course...

    --
    or else!
  13. When... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Did Americans give a shit about french thoughts?

    1. Re:When... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't find your post funny at all.

      When was Slasdot made exclusively for Americans readers?

    2. Re:When... by ogre57 · · Score: 1
      Did Americans give a shit about french thoughts?
      1776
  14. in a word, No. by Lehk228 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People like to have something tangable when they buy something. also DVD allows you to go pretty much anywhere with a DVD and a DVD player and watch your movies, online services would require you either recodr your files onto some kind of removable storage or have a haigh bandwidth connection anywhere you want to watch movies.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:in a word, No. by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

      People like to have something tangable when they buy something

      Let me introduce you to something you may have missed:

      "iTunes"

      --
      If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
    2. Re:in a word, No. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      let me know when iTunes kills off CD sales smartass.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:in a word, No. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      People like to have something tangable when they buy something.

      Clearly, you are correct. That's obviously why iTunes has been such a spectacular failure.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:in a word, No. by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the iPod photo? Next step is one that will play video and you've got a portable DVD player with no need for physical media. Granted, you probably would want a larger screen, but that's just real estate and not difficult at all. Perhaps make the whole front of the iPod a touch screen instead of the wheel so you have a 16:9 screen format as well (turn it sideways) or just make it somewhat larger. That will be the difficult part, finding a screen size that is small enough to be truly portable and large enough for people to actually want to use it as a solution.

      bkr

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    5. Re:in a word, No. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Have you seen the iPod photo? Next step is one that will play video and you've got a portable DVD player with no need for physical media.

      Pay attention at the back! Portable media players have been around for years. You've been able to play DivX etc on PDAs for years, hell every cellphone I've had for the past three years has been capable of it.

      Honestly, I get the impression that most people think Apple invented the mp3 player. They just have very good marketing, that's all! If you are waiting to see what they do next, you'll be about 2-3 years behind the rest of us.

      Perhaps make the whole front of the iPod a touch screen instead of the wheel so you have a 16:9 screen format as well (turn it sideways) or just make it somewhat larger.

      Sounds exactly like my PDA that's sitting in my pocket right now. It's a shame I drive; I'm itching to sit and watch Futurama etc while on the subway!

  15. No. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Insightful
    How many people used LaserDiscs or had LaserDisc players at the height of their popularty?
    How many people have used DVDs and DVD players? Or have a DVD drive in their computer?

    They may be going the way of VHS or casette tapes (or at worst 8-tracks), but they're not going the way of LaserDisc any time soon.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    1. Re:No. by NotYourMother · · Score: 1

      How many parents use the DVD player in the minivan to pacify? (and BTW virtual breasts can't breastfeed...)

      --
      My cup is empty , I am bereft, my coffee, my sanity, I have none left.
  16. TV noobs by crypto55 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People will never be able to figure out how to run a VoD file on their TV...
    "Honey, why won't the ethernet cable fit in the coaxial input?"
    Wait, that would be MPEG, not NTSC streams...

    --
    Due to financial difficulties, the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off.
  17. HA! by yuriismaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't even need to RTFA for this one...

    Broadband cannot replace DVD's. I don't see a day where accessing large amounts of data is as guaranteed as having a disc with everything accessible right then and there. I know I would rather have my DVD available than rely on some server that may or may not go down when they feel like it.

    I also enjoy being able to boot a device not connected to the intarweb with a DVD. I don't see DVD's going anywhere, unless Blu-Ray/HD-DVD manage to oust it (this will still take many a year for the prices to even out)

    1. Re:HA! by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have to agree with this. My cable supplier (Comcast) has On Demand. While it is nice to catch up on Monty Python when I feel like it, only a few episodes are available, and I have no idea if one day they'll drop it as a choice.

      I like a lot of foreign and art films. Even for a director like Alfred Hitchcock, there are a lot of his films I can't get from On Demand or haven't been shown on cable (unless hacked up and notably abridged on commercial networks) in years. I'll keep buyin DVDs as long as I can get films like "La Strada" on DVD, but have trouble finding it on cable. While this may be a small market, I think the overall idea is a reason why people will always by some type of physical media, even if it's a memory stick with music or video on it. If you buy it, you've got it forever, and aren't dependent on a cable system or other content provider for it.

      A few years ago, Hurrican Isabel hit and many people in our area had no power for 2 weeks (it was 9-10 days for me). I spent a lot of time doing yard work I hadn't had time to do (I do programming at home, as part of my own business, so my hours are funky), and in the evenings I'd go out to bookstores, just so I could go some place with lights that felt civilized. For me, being able to put a CD in my boom box during the day and hear music I liked was a small part of what kept me sane. If I had only downloaded music to my hard drive, I would have had a much smaller selection to listen too.

      Maybe I'm old fashioned, but I know I really like having a physical media that my music and movies are on, so I can play what I want when I want.

    2. Re:HA! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 1
      I agree. I'm not expecting to download movies-on-demand any time soon. We need a one or two order of magnitude increase in bandwith for it to start being practical. Just look at how long it takes to download a GNU/Linux distro. DVD content tends to be several times as large. I could walk back and forth to and from the video store numerous times in the time it would take to download the content. It would be healthier too, but I'm lazy and I drive there.

      Far from agreeing with the "broadband kills DVD" premise, I await with bated breath DVD disks and burners with 20-50 Gb capacity. Those will last for several years before broadband becomes a significant threat to physical media.

    3. Re:HA! by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      In other news, Webex CEO just published an article on how videoconferencing is going to kill off the automobile & airline industry & submitted it to slashdot.

    4. Re:HA! by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      Broadband cannot replace DVD's.

      I wouldn't say the broadband "cannot" replace DVDs: rather, today's broadband will not replace DVDs because the amount of data on a DVD is vastly too large. I remember reading that Netflix ships about as much data through the mail in the form of DVDs per day as something like 3/4 of all internet traffic. Those numbers may be off somewhat, but I wouldn't be surprised if Netflix ships an appreciable percentage of the Internet's total traffic, since each DVD they send contains two - nine GB of data. I don't think I transfer that much data over the net in the course of a year, or even the last two years -- but I receive more than a dozen DVDs from Netflix every year.

      That being said, though, I'm guessing that twenty years from now, when broadband is really broad, connections ubiquitious and storage space much larger than it is today, some form of Video over IP will replace shiny plastic discs. That day is coming, but I think it's further off than a lot of /. types think -- although it won't be put off forever, as part of your post seems to indicate.

    5. Re:HA! by master_p · · Score: 1

      The problem is purely technological: the bandwidth limitation and poor hardware/software is what makes DVDs stick around for a long time. Imagine if every room in your house had a T3 line: would you ever bother rending a DVD? nope. Especially if the movie's content is updated at real time, with new scenes, new interviews, scenes from the production and maybe worldwide forums to comment on the movies.

    6. Re:HA! by Squirmy+McPhee · · Score: 1
      I have to agree with this. My cable supplier (Comcast) has On Demand. While it is nice to catch up on Monty Python when I feel like it, only a few episodes are available, and I have no idea if one day they'll drop it as a choice.

      My thoughts exactly. Plus, how would broadband movies be different from pay-per-view? Why would I choose to watch a movie on my computer screen when I can have the same movie sent to my TV screen instead?

      Broadband won't kill the DVD for exactly the same reasons pay-per-view has not.

  18. No by GerbilSocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    HD DVD or BluRay will kill off DVD.

    1. Re:No by adam31 · · Score: 2, Informative
      PS3 will have BluRay, so that will be many people's first BluRay player. Then, the masses will gently migrate as the question is no longer to buy the player but rather which format disc to purchase.

      So, it'd probably be more accurate to say that Blu-Ray will kill off DVD Players, but not DVDs themselves.

    2. Re:No by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with BluRay taking off as a medium is that DVD is already "good enough" for the vast majority of people. The quality of a DVD already surprasses what a normal SD-TV can produce. Until the prices of HD-TVs start going down to be similar to the price of a normal TV, most people are still going to have regular SD-TVs.

      So don't plan on BluRay replacing DVD anytime soon. Consumers have a long history of resisting format changes until the benefits outweigh the costs. To complicate matters even further there's still a battle over which standard, BluRay or HD-DVD will win the battle. Unless one or the other deals a knockout punch early on, they'll both end up losing to the old format of DVD. As I've already said DVD is "good enough", and there's a large segment of the market that doesn't want to get burned with useless equipment (i.e. Beta, and 8-track).

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:No by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Video cassettes were "good enough" too.

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    4. Re:No by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      No, video cassettes were never "good enough". The quality always sucked, the access was linear, the quality only got worse as the tape wore out, etc. SVHS was a bit better, but not better enough for anyone but video enthusiasts to adopt it. Video cassettes were as "good enough" as audio cassettes were. That is, not at all.

      CDs quickly became the dominant medium over audio cassettes for the very same reasons DVD overtook VHS. Cassette tapes were relegated to portable environments like cars, walkmans, etc.

      --
      AccountKiller
    5. Re:No by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Yes, we all know that videos are inferior to DVDs, but my point is that before DVDs were known about we were all happy enough with video cassettes.

      Personally, I could never ever go back, but at the time, yes I (along with the millions of other video cassette buyers) was happy enough.

      I imagine that if I could somehow watch nothing but HiDef DVDs for a month, I would find it hard to go back to regular DVDs.

      Things are good enough only while there is nothing better available.

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    6. Re:No by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      Until the prices of HD-TVs start going down to be similar to the price of a normal TV, most people are still going to have regular SD-TVs.

      However, the prices of TV's capable of displaying ATSC high-definition signals in 720p or 1080i formats are rapidly dropping. For example, you can get decent 43" to 50" (diagonal) wide-screen rear-projection TV's using LCD elements for well under US$2,700, and I expect those prices to drop even further within the next 18 months or so. Feed these new RPTV's with a true HD signal compared to the 480p signal from a current DVD player and you'll notice how much sharper the HD signal is. :)

    7. Re:No by justforaday · · Score: 1

      Personally, I could never ever go back, but at the time, yes I (along with the millions of other video cassette buyers) was happy enough.

      Could that possibly be because VHS was the only medium that allowed you to transport and watch video at the time? Yes, VHS was crappy, but it was all we had. Times have changed and quality has improved...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    8. Re:No by SpiceWare · · Score: 1
      I imagine that if I could somehow watch nothing but HiDef DVDs for a month, I would find it hard to go back to regular DVDs.
      I'm already that way with standard def TV. I get 16 channels of High Def and find that it is now very rare for me to watch a standard def show. Having the DVR helped reduce my standard-def viewing as well as I've almost always got something recorded in High Def that I want to see.
    9. Re:No by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with this.

      DVD is "good enough".

      I have friends with hi-def and I've looked at the sets at the store and I just don't see a reason to drop a thousand bucks for a 1% improvement in image quality.

      Likewise, the DVD format has holes and I can make backups. I'm sure the HD-DVD and Blu-Ray are going to be locked down much tighter. Support for those formats means I'm supporting paying .99 every time I want to watch something.

      I am heading towards broadband (as the article aludes to). I have half a terabyte of stuff now. Backup is accomplished by DVD-R's for the best stuff and double hard drives for everything else.

      Some of the shows (Get Smart) are encoded around 100MB/Hour and that's not enough but at least I can see a show that is not for sale and not currently being broadcast.

      Others are (Battlestar Galactica, Lost, Due South) are encoded at 350MB/Hour and that appears to be just below (and with Divx6 right at ) DVD level. Some I get to see episodes that have not aired here yet.
      Others I get to see shows that I didn't hear about until they were on episode. And some are not for sale and not currently being broadcast.

      I'm still buying $40 a week worth of DVD's (latest was friends 9, Eternal Bliss of the.., and Kill Bill 2).

      DVD's are not going to go away and broadband is going to enhance it.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    10. Re:No by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yes, we all know that videos are inferior to DVDs, but my point is that before DVDs were known about we were all happy enough with video cassettes.

      Not me - I always hated tape, never bought any movies on tape and quickly gave up any attempt to archieve TV shows, even on SVHS. I hated renting tapes becasue the quality was always so *bad*.

      DVDs are fine, however, and I won't re-buy my existing collection unless there's some appealing new physical form factor (small, caseless, no fragile disc, etc). I'm not impressed with higher resolution of the same source material for older programming, but I would shell out for significantly better physical media to collect.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:No by farmhick · · Score: 1

      Maybe DVDs surpass what a standard TV can produce, but not all DVDs are at that standard. I have a new Sony TV, it has good clarity. A couple months ago we were watching "Gothika" with Halle Berry. As she was sneaking around the mental hospital, the subtle shadows were generally just large blotches of black surrounded by jagged blotches of not-quite-black. I figure this is from the compression they use to fit the movie and all extras on one disk, but I find that to be a poor excuse.

      So, BluRay may be just what we need, even for standard TVs like mine. That or use two disks for every movie, one for the movie and a second one for the extras. But that second DVD costs money, so most movies released aren't going to have it.

      --
      I have to stop wasting so much time reading Slashdot. It's interfering with my crystal meth addiction.
    12. Re:No by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Why are you restating my point?
      :)

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  19. Generation Gap by MrAsstastic · · Score: 0

    My father never even made it to DVD. I tried to tempt him a few times with a DVD player and he even bought a shoebox full of discs at a garage sale, but he remains hopelessly committed to the VHS. He was proud enough to call me today to mention that he had successfully googled some antique car info that he was curious about. He is also curious about email, but hey, one day at a time I guess.

  20. Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is just too expensive or unavailable in too many markets. Plus a DVD holds a hell of a lot of data. If people were downloading full quality video (DVDs) from the Internet they wouldn't be doing much else with their connections. Torrent traffic would be 95% of Internet traffic instead of one-third. And what about the laws being passed banning efficient methods of distributing data such as torrents? No, broadband won't kill off the DVD.

  21. Then what do you put.... by gkuz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...under the Christmas tree? Weren't e-books going to replace physical books by now, too?

    1. Re:Then what do you put.... by PxM · · Score: 1

      The problem with ebooks is still a matter of viewing technology rather than distribution technology. People don't like reading from the computer screen for long periods of time and e-paper has been Just Around the Corner for a while now. However, DVDs are displayed on the same media technology as MPEG4 (or whatever the top of the line is) but the problem has always been distribution since it is still expensive to download DVD quality video in terms of the bandwith needed. As bandwith increases, this problem disappears and downloaded media (via legal Bittorrent or whatever method) will be easier than physical media. The same will only be true for ebooks once epaper becomes efeasible.

      --
      Free iPod? Try a free Mac Mini
      Or a free Nintendo DS, GC, PS2, Xbox
      Wired article as proof

    2. Re:Then what do you put.... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to regret this but irc.nullus.net

    3. Re:Then what do you put.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How will you watch the video in places without broadband such as an aircraft or the subway? For this to work you would need very cheap high speed (T1 at least) wireless broadband everywhere including all aircraft. I just don't see that happening.

  22. This guy is an idiot. by bburton · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Will broadband kill off the DVD?
    Short answer: No.

    The DVD format will be nothing more than a flash in the pan, according to the chief executive of Alcatel.
    Come on people. This article is just plain stupid. I can see the DVD being upgraded, for more storage capacity (see blue-ray), I can see the DVD fading away gradually (like VHS); but saying that Joe Sixpack will suddenly stop buying DVDs and use, say a broadband connected Tivo-like-device, is ludicrous. Technology lingers. That's why Microsoft has to build in special modes in their OS to run older programs. People still use legacy technology! Hell, I still have a tape player in my car. :-)

    But I'm getting ahead of myself. The article doesn't talk about Tivos, Internet TV streams, or some new emerging technology. In fact, it doesn't really mention anything!

    I'm not sure how articles like this end up on slashdot. I should write an article: New Power Source will replace Gasoline!

    Hey, put me on slashdot!
    --
    Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    1. Re:This guy is an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. They should probably post real stories like this.

    2. Re:This guy is an idiot. by danila · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nope. You are an idiot and that guy is a chief executive of Alcatel. His job is not looking out of the window and saying "DVDs are popular". No, it's about looking 10 years into the future, realising that communications in 2015 are going to be very different from what we have today, and then steering the company into that future, using the opportunities and avoiding the threats to maximum shareholders' satisfaction.

      Consider this. Whenether any technology is relatively unpopular (aviation in 1899, video downloading in 2005, personal computers in 1970), asking an average person about its prospects is futile. The person is likely to reply with "noone will ever use it, don't you see that is so popular?", which is expected, but totally wrong.

      So the fact that most people think DVDs will rule the earth for millennia to come and broadband will never be all that important, doesn't change the fact that those people are shortsighted morons and the fact that the future will be widely different from today.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:This guy is an idiot. by nzkbuk · · Score: 1

      The DVD format will be nothing more than a flash in the pan, according to the chief executive of Alcatel.

      Hello? He's the CEO of http://www.alcatel.com/, NOT the CEO of Universal/ Sony etc. You might as well have asked the CEO of Cisco if they think video data will be delieverd on disks or as data streams over networks.
      These guys have a vested interest in saying "Hey invest in us because we are the way of the future"

    4. Re:This guy is an idiot. by danila · · Score: 1

      It should have been "noone will ever use it, don't you see that is so popular?", but I forgot to escape the angular brackets.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    5. Re:This guy is an idiot. by FuzzyShrimp · · Score: 1

      I guess Broadband and DVDs will be replaced one day in the future by something better. What a futurist projection. Wow, that takes guts. When they shrink memory cards like SD and xD to be able contain Terrabytes and be as small as a dime, maybe we will all have fantasic collections of movies, backups and such. The problem of cataloging will always be the major prob at home... now, where's my movie of "War and Peace"?

    6. Re:This guy is an idiot. by bburton · · Score: 1
      Please, allow me to retort.

      His job is not looking out of the window and saying "DVDs are popular". No, it's about looking 10 years into the future, realising that communications in 2015 are going to be very different from what we have today, and then steering the company into that future, using the opportunities and avoiding the threats to maximum shareholders' satisfaction.
      Steering the company where? He never specifies, all he says is "broadband". We already have broadband. What is it that he will add/invent/innovate that will make me stop buying DVDs.

      See he said DVDs will only be a "flash in the pan". That's what makes him the idiot. DVDs are already well established, and only an idiot would make a statement like that. "Flash in the pan" implies that the technology will never takes hold. OBVIOUSLY it has.

      You are an idiot and that guy is a chief executive of Alcatel.
      Well, I lubs you too peaches.
      --
      Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    7. Re:This guy is an idiot. by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

      Sir,

      I represent Wikkid Indolence Patenting Industries Ltd and, thanks to your crazy^H^H^H^H^H wonderful American legal system, we have already patented the idea that A New Power Source will one day replace Gasoline.

      You are therefore in breach of our patent and/or Intellectual Property (we're not sure which as we only have a cheap lawyer) and we demand 10p (UK).

      Thankyou.

      --
      Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    8. Re:This guy is an idiot. by danila · · Score: 1

      We already have broadband, but we don't have:
      1) Ubiquitous broadband
      2) Online video stores
      3) The willingness of movie studios to accept the new distribution mode
      etc.

      It's hard to predict exactly and in details our path to our DVDless future of 2015, because it depends largely on transient random events, but the end result is clear.

      In 2015 or so broadband Internet penetration will be 90-100%. All communications will be IP-based and almost everything will be routed on the Internet in one way or another. Every apartment will have a broadband connection, every device will have either wireless (wifi/bluetooth/something else) or wired connection. The consumer electronics at home will be controllable from any other device. Your TV will be capable of getting digital content online if you so wish. The studios will realise that digital online distribution is great and will somehow sort out the DRM/copyright issues (it won't be pretty, but it won't stay a perpetual problem either). If necessary, anonymous P2P will develop to fill the empty niche.

      Your TV will be sufficiently high resolution to allow comfortable web/something else browsing. You'll be able to log onto some online video store (or just content store) and browse the films. Alternatively, there won't even be an online store. You will just use a local (or remote) application that would collect the data about films from Semantic Web and present it to you in the format that you choose. On selecting a movie you would simply click "play" and the movie will start instantly. The beginning will be streamed (so that you don't have to wait) in parallel with downloading the rest of the film.

      Oh, and I forgot to mention that the system will also accept voice input allowing you to simply say "Play the Million Dollar Baby" and that the system will also provide helpful suggestions so that you can just choose the genre (what do you want to watch - a comedy, an action film, a horror movie or drama) and the recommendation system will suggest a film you haven't seen yet, but are statistically likely to enjoy.

      All that will make you stop buying DVD. Of course, you can stubbornly pretend that it won't, but that would not be very convincing. And so DVDs will in fact be a "flash in the pan", which can also mean "temporary success without no long-term effects".

      And in any case, may be you could be more forgiving to the poor guy. It seems that Tchuruk is French and he can be excused for not knowing the precise meaning of every last English idiom. Especially since his speech at Alcatel Forum might have been in French and so a translator could be responsible for this bad use of a metaphor. Picking on the poor guy for that minor mistake, while completely ignoring his point sounds like something only an idiot would do.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:This guy is an idiot. by bburton · · Score: 1

      You make some interesting predictions there peaches. I'm happy that you have such an active imagination. However, I'm not interested in your dogmatic rhetoric. Why? Because, frankly, it's irrelavant to my parent post. I want to know what he plans to give me, not you.

      It's a safe statement to say that DVDs will be replaced at some time in the future. Well DUH. The problem with the article is that it's so open ended. If the article would have stated the points you made above (or anything really), my post wouldn't have been so hard on the guy.

      That being said, I don't think DVDs or DVD derivatives are going away any time soon. It's possible that some broadband based system will take hold and be the majority leader on content delivery (given enough time); yet I still refuse to believe that DVDs will be a "flash in the pan," even if the definition of flash in the pan is "temporary success with no long term effects." Come on, do you really beleive DVDs won't have any long-term effects?

      And by the way, I don't care what nationality Tchuruk is. He's responsible for what he says; and if he was misquoted, then that's the translator's fault. I can only comment on what he gives me, and he gave me crap.

      --
      Slashdot = ((Technology + Politics) / Trolls) % Grammar Nazis
    10. Re:This guy is an idiot. by danila · · Score: 1

      "The DVD will be short lived," said Tchuruk. "This kind of video was a passive exercise. Today things need to be much more interactive." ... Tchuruk described as "user-centric broadband"

      I don't see any other quotes there. It seems that a lot of your attacks on Tchuruk should be targeted at Iain Thomson instead. I am sure that Tchuruk's speach had much more content than the article (I am really uncomfortable calling it an "article", since it seems to be just a quick and dirty recollection of some points made by Serge), but then again, Alcatel Forum was an invitation-only event and I wasn't invited, so what do I know...

      I still don't see how you can attack Tchuruk for imprecise language. "Flash in the pan" was not quoted in the article, unlike, say, "user-centric broadband", so we have no reason to believe that Tchuruk used these words.

      What he said is that in some indeterminate future (short term enough to warrant speaking about it, but no hard estimates were given) broadband will replace DVDs as delivery method for movies. Nowhere does he claim that customers "will suddenly stop buying DVDs". For all we know, may be Tchuruk agrees with you that "the DVD [will fade] away gradually" like VHS. This sounds reasonable and if a CE? of Alcatel (the leader in fibre-optics) believes it is feasible to provide enough capacity to customers to watch movies via broadband, I see no reason not to believe them.

      I share your indignation at the article, it was really pathetic and not very informative. But a) we don't have a better article and b) Serge Tchuruk didn't write it, Iain Thomson did. So please stop attacking Tchuruk. I am starting to suspect that you have some personal grudge against Serge...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  23. Well duh... by computerme · · Score: 1

    The question is when..

    But I have a feeling i will be buying the Blu-Ray HDTV DVD extended version of LOTR ... well ......... before then...

    In fact i'd be the shire on it...

  24. No, you're wrong. by Kuj0317 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    wow, i just saw this, and already the 3 stereotypical posts have been made.

    Anyway, No, it will not pass into obsurity anytime soon. The reason is, unlike laserdisc, DVD actually has a sizeable installed base. That means, that the next gen format will support DVD, and the gen after that will probably do so aswell.

  25. The demise of the DVD for entertainment by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 1

    Sure it makes alot of sense - phyiscal possession of content is the real problem that RIAA etc is fighting with. The only real answer is "pay-per-view", and broadband brings control of the distribution back into their grubby paws.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  26. hedge my bets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call "no".

  27. Not so fast by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    Not until my VCR-DVD-whatever-player-of-the-future can read directly from the Internet or other storage (but apparently not DVDs, because they must be going away), and not until everybody has broadband. Speaking of everybody having broadband, that's an issue in itself. It's not available everywhere, and my rural area is one of them. DVDs certainly aren't going anywhere around here, or many other places, if broadband is all that's going to make them "obsolete".

    --
    R.Mo
    1. Re:Not so fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long range wireless broadband I'm sure will eventually take care of that problem.

    2. Re:Not so fast by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

      Long range wireless broadband I'm sure will eventually take care of that problem.

      Great. Tell me when someone's (or you've) got that deployed for us, and I'll be sure to try it out. :)

      --
      R.Mo
  28. I think he caught a cold while in france... by skogs · · Score: 0, Troll

    Like many french folk, he has become infected with the idea that his ideas are important. This is a completely laughable idea. DVDs...or other media will not simply disappear. Granted, with a country as small as france, it would be much easier to give broadband to each little farmer, but it doesn't happen quite that easily in countries as big as Russia, China, India, or America. Serge is a bit caught up in his ideal world. The matrix is not here yet buddy.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
  29. This reminds me... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

    ..Of an article I read long ago about the internet replacing CD's....

  30. no computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what of those who don't have a computer (e.g. grandparents or those who just refuse to buy one because they don't really need one)?

    There will always be a need for a physical format for delivering a movie - and even music for that matter.

  31. Broadband never everywhere by gregmac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Broadband is not everywhere yet, and never will be. I can take a dvd and watch it in my laptop or a portable player in the car or train (while driving through a tunnel through a mountain), on a plane, in the middle of nowhere, etc..

    Furthermore, people have large collections of DVD. Why I want to wait even a few minutes to download something when I can just stick it in my DVD player. More likely, by the time that DVDs take a few minutes to download, I will have my entire DVD collection sitting on a massive harddrive in a media jukebox anyways (provided some corperation doesn't make that illegal, anyways) and I can watch on demand, just like downloading. Except I don't have to pay extra bandwidth fees (if applicable) or anyone else any money who wanted to charge per viewing (since they can).

    --
    Speak before you think
    1. Re:Broadband never everywhere by alain94040 · · Score: 2, Informative
      You are missing the point.

      There are people today that watch "live" TV through their ADSL connection. Forget about downloading, or waiting minutes. This is an Mpeg-2 stream, at a few Mbit/s, except it's true video on demand over ADSL.

      DVD will survive for all the portable applications mentioned above, but if you look at how many people just want to watch movies from the comfort of their living room, that's the ADSL market.

      The funny thing of course is that for whatever obscure reason, the ADSL bandwidth in the US is capped and you can't stream live video, but it doesn't mean other countries can't. That explains why 90% of the posters on that thread laugh about the French comment, when actually the rest of the world is laughing about slow ADSL in the US.

      Alain.

    2. Re:Broadband never everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not typical.

      Most people consume movies by renting and spending a few minutes downloading a movie in exchange for access to the entire library of any movie ever made is something most people would trade. Myself included.

      I do declare, whichever company that marries a PVR for TV, video on demand for movies, and digital distribution of music wins. This covers the vast majority of reasonable media use-cases for Joe Average.

      If it is Apple, we all lose.

    3. Re:Broadband never everywhere by mzwaterski · · Score: 1
      I hate to say it, but you speak of Windows Media Center with the Napster plugin and the CinemaNow (i believe its called) service.

      Excellent PVR interface with free guide download. Rent from a very wide selection of movies with about a 1 minute lead time on downloads, and all the music that napster holds to listen to as radio stations, specific songs, or download/burn format.

    4. Re:Broadband never everywhere by arminw · · Score: 1

      ...provided some corperation doesn't make that illegal...

      Supposedly it is illegal now to copy DVD movies. However there are programs available on the Internet in places beyond the reach of the DMCA that allow the copying of movies to a HD despite the encryption of most DVDs. Physical media will always be used to store digital data, movies included. No copy protection or laws have EVER worked to prevent copying by those who want to make the effort to do so. If a stream of bits is accessible anywhere along its path, it can be duplicated and recorded. It is one thing to make copies for personal use and convenience but quite another to wantonly distribute such copies to others. If encrypted movies become legally distributed over the Internet, they'll get copied onto physical media by most users, DRM stripped out, because hard drives die easily.

      --
      All theory is gray
    5. Re:Broadband never everywhere by whitis · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, people have large collections of DVD. Why I want to wait even a few minutes to download something when I can just stick it in my DVD player. More likely, by the time that DVDs take a few minutes to download, I will have my entire DVD collection sitting on a massive harddrive in a media jukebox anyways (provided some corperation doesn't make that illegal, anyways) and I can watch on demand, just like downloading. Except I don't have to pay extra bandwidth fees (if applicable) or anyone else any money who wanted to charge per viewing (since they can).

      Nope. DVDs are slower than broadband. You have to drive down to the store to buy or rent the DVD or order it from amazon, netflix, etc. With broadband, you would be able to get the bits within about an hour if you want to watch it asap (otherwise, you could select a lower priority download that arrives by the next day). You could even start watching the movie before it finishes downloading. Then you store the bits on your hard drive "jukebox" or burn a DVD. Technically speaking, broadband delivery can work quite nicely once internet capacity grows a bit. It is a question of whether they kill it with obnoxious DRM.

      It currently takes me about 1 day to get a movie from netflix and 2-3 to send it back. Add in some throttling and you are limited to about 3 movies per week (on the 3 at a time plan). Broadband delivery could significantly improve that, once broadband speeds are more reasonable.

      To make broadband video purchases/rentals appealing would require:

      • DRM for rentals ONLY. And it must be inobtrusive, including players for all OSes and support for all desktop boxes. Needs to work with open source players subject to the restriction that the players can't be distributed with DRM bypassing code. As an alternative, lower quality versions (DivX) with no DRM at all would be availible for rental.
      • You must be able to play the movie as many times as you want during the rental period, without downloading it again. I.E. the bits must be stored on your hard drive.
      • You must be able to transfer the movie to as many devices as you want.
      • Rent to purchase. If you rent a movie and want to buy it, you can recycle the bits you already downloaded. Once you pay, the DRM is stripped off and the movie is stored unencrypted. This assumes rental and purchase versions are same quality.
      • You must be able to easily burn the bits to a DVD if you want to do so.
      • You must be able to transfer the bits to as many devices as you want.
      • If your copy is lost and you haven't burned it to DVD, you must be able to download it again without paying to buy the movie again (though a small charge for bandwidth may be reasonable). You should be able to download your entire collection again in one step. This means there must be a permanent record of your license on the server end.
      • The quality needs to be comparable to DVD for purchased movies
      • The cost must be less than the cost of a DVD.
      • Downloads must include all special features.
      • You must get cover art, inserts, etc. in formats suitable for printing and online viewing.
      • You must get a cryptographically signed proof of purchase as a separate file or be able to extract it to a separate file that can be easily archived.
      • You must be able to make fair use copies.
      • You must be able to transfer your license
      • Copies of movies may contain individual watermarks to aid tracking pirates. Someone else distributing your copy does not prove they didn't steal your copy but it does help track down repeat offenders.
      • DRM needs to be breakable by anyone sophisticated enough to patch and recompile an open source player, but players may
    6. Re:Broadband never everywhere by mr_snarf · · Score: 1

      US having slow ADSL? Man, here in Western Australia our broadband options are limited. Fastest ADSL is 1.5Mbit, and thats really expensive.

      --
      printf("Goodbye cruel world!\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b");
    7. Re:Broadband never everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Broadband is not everywhere yet, and never will be. I can take a dvd and watch it in my laptop or a portable player in the car or train (while driving through a tunnel through a mountain), on a plane, in the middle of nowhere, etc..


      Yeah, most people watch their DVD's with a laptop/portable player on a train or on a plane... come on.

  32. Rogers Hi-Speed ISP Certainly Thinks Not! by Elecore · · Score: 1

    If this is the future, then ISPs need to stop putting caps on everything. I mean, imagine the frustration of what could happen. Companies start streaming full DVDs ISPs say "Use our hispeed to watch DVDs!" User downloads a few DVDs ISP: You downloaded a lot of bandwidth. Probably illegal. Here's a big bill (or in the case of Rogers Hispeed here in Canada, they just terminate your service).

  33. within 5 years, large... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cities will do this. Plain and simple, the networks can deliver, but only if you are connected. But much of America, let alone the world, is still not connected. Funny though, it will probably be S. Korea that will be the early adopter of this, just due to their low costs of high bandwidth.

  34. Obligatory Simpsons Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wasn't there a fairly recent episode where Homer was at the dump and walked by one pile of garbage marked "Laserdiscs" and another marked "Beta Videocassettes" followed by one marked for DVDs? This reminds me of that.

    You know, I think there really is a Simpsons reference for every occasion.

    1. Re:Obligatory Simpsons Reference by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      That's why DVDs will be around for at least as long as it takes for the final Simpsons DVD to be released.

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
  35. What a question! by rookworm · · Score: 1
    Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?

    Considering the number of DVDs in the wild compared to Laserdiscs, unlikely. They will become obsolete eventually, of course, but we will all still remember the days of watching movies on DVD.

    --
    The toad can't burp - and for some reason can't fart either, so it swells up and eventually explodes. --Anonymous Coward
  36. Not much of a surprise, actually... by jxyama · · Score: 1
    ...considering the interest/market of the company the guy's representing.

    it sounds more like what he wished would happen instead of what he really believes will happen.

  37. Media companies wet dream. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Streaming content via major broadband in quality high enough to compete with dvd would be a media company's wet dream. Total control. They'd charge you by the view or on a subscription basis.

    The truth of the matter is, people enjoy having physical copies of their media to represent their collection. And its a good backup. I don't think the medium will be replacing the media anytime soon. Just expect storage to get larger in capacity, and smaller in physical size.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Media companies wet dream. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both subscription and PPV then on top of that, your ISP will charge per bit/byte/Kbyte

      As for the rest.... Most people (not here on /.) seem to forget that DVD is not just for movies. I remember when DVD = Digital Versatile Disk.....

  38. Not Soon by Luthair · · Score: 1

    I can't see many people being willing to switch from DVDs at this point. I would bet 3-5 years before the industry manages to pick one and titles start showing.

    And really, unless you have HDTV the new formats aren't going to be worth it.

    1. Re:Not Soon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD is at the peak that CD's were in the early 90's, after it had finally moved past LP's in popularity. It's going to be around for many years, IMO.

      Another thing about DVD's that CD's never had - most people aren't even getting the best picture on their non-progressive scan 4:3 TV's. Once 16:9 HDTV's are purchased + add a PS DVD player, and old DVD's look brand new. Movie makers will have to add 15 hours of "extra features" to get people to cough up another 20 bucks for a movie they already have.

    2. Re:Not Soon by Eccles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      DVD players can be had for under $40. I doubt mass produced BluRay or HD DVD players that still play regular DVDs would cost much more, so people will probably end up buying a dual format player and slowly migrating to the new formats. Discs with entire seasons of shows would be cheaper than the current ones, and thus those discs will probably kick-start the higher def format sales.

      I agree that most people would be loathe to replace many DVDs with HDTV format ones, except their very favorite ones.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:Not Soon by evilviper · · Score: 1
      DVD players can be had for under $40. I doubt mass produced BluRay or HD DVD players that still play regular DVDs would cost much more

      You shouldn't doubt that at all... BluRay and HD-DVD are not only going to have much better hardware to read the Discs, they are also required to be able to decode WMV9, VP6, MPEG-4AVC, etc. Right now, Pioneer has an HDTV WMV9 player that retails for well-over a thousand dollars... Mass production and time will drop prices singnificantly, but I don't believe high-def players will come close to being as cheap as DVD players currently are, at least not in the next couple DECADES. So, people are going to have to pay a high premium for high-def players for years to come, and the switch-over isn't going to be nearly as smooth as you make it sound.

      Hell, it's entirely possible that HD-DVD and BluRay will become the new LaserDiscs, with DVD remaining the standard format for many years to come, even though they only use half the resolution of your fancy TV...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:Not Soon by Eccles · · Score: 1

      BluRay and HD-DVD are not only going to have much better hardware to read the Discs, they are also required to be able to decode WMV9, VP6, MPEG-4AVC, etc.

      Codecs are practically free. There's a minimal licensing fee per unit for some, but the MPEG-2 licenses haven't made DVD players pricey.

      Right now, Pioneer has an HDTV WMV9 player that retails for well-over a thousand dollars...

      I remember $8,000 CD writers in 1995, $500 DVD players in 1999*, $8,000 20" LCDs in ~2000*. Within five years, probably less, expect high-def players for under $200.

      (* I think I have those years right.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    5. Re:Not Soon by Phlare · · Score: 1
      Discs with entire seasons of shows would be cheaper than the current ones

      I wouldn't count on it... When you purchase episodes of a television show, the bulk of the price you pay isn't going for the little plastic discs upon which the bits are etched. You're paying for the IP. A new format with higher-capacity media is unlikely to convince the content producers to charge less for their IP.

    6. Re:Not Soon by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not much cheaper, but they would be cheaper to produce (which reduces the optimum sales price), and easier to store. I've considered buying cheap DVD replacements of my videotapes just to reduce the storage space needs.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    7. Re:Not Soon by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Codecs are practically free.

      The hardware to decode them isn't...

      Within five years, probably less, expect high-def players for under $200.

      That's fine, but that still doesn't come close to the current $40 price of standard DVD players.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Not Soon by Eccles · · Score: 1

      The hardware to decode these other formats is already present in the player, it's just the firmware that would need additional format support.

      That's fine, but that still doesn't come close to the current $40 price of standard DVD players.

      Yeah, that might take a year or two longer.

      It wasn't very long ago that DVD-Rs cost more than your standard DVD movie. This week they're 20 cents each in lots of 100 at CompUSA.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    9. Re:Not Soon by evilviper · · Score: 1
      That's fine, but that still doesn't come close to the current $40 price of standard DVD players.

      Yeah, that might take a year or two longer.

      Okay, but then you are looking at SEVEN YEARS before BluRay/HD-DVD players are as cheap as current DVD players, which is such as glaring omission as to make your post incorrect.

      Since it seems like you don't even remember, allow me to post the original quote:

      DVD players can be had for under $40. I doubt mass produced BluRay or HD DVD players that still play regular DVDs would cost much more

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  39. NO! by pbjones · · Score: 1

    Thearters survived Video tape,
    DVDs will survive broadband, in countries with wide access to broadband the actual take up rate is low, only getting higher where Gov. makes it cheaper.

    I am a casual collector of DVD and their shelf life makes them 1000 x better than a VCR cassette.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  40. Yes and... by mbrewthx · · Score: 5, Funny

    Video killed the radio star!!!!

    --
    __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    1. Re:Yes and... by madaxe42 · · Score: 1

      Thats just freaky - I was just humming that tune - then scrolled down to your post - deeply subliminal, I'm sure.

    2. Re:Yes and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Internet killed the video star

  41. No freakin way by foldedspace · · Score: 2, Informative

    I own 0 MP3s. I own about 100 CDs.

    I own 0 downloaded movies. I own about 40 DVDs.

    I have broadband and the cable company still makes me think twice before downloading big files because of their usage caps. If the cable company sold the movies directly it would be closer to functional, but watching movies on a computer sucks. It's basically just PPV on demand.

    1. Re:No freakin way by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, because nobody will ever figure out a way to watch something you download on your living room TV.

    2. Re:No freakin way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Summary of this post: The following comments basically say that wander a bit off topic and conclude that not even HD-DVD is a viable threat to DVD.]

      Like the parent, I don't have any downloaded/burned media. However, we're just opposite on CD/DVD numbers. I only own about 40 CDs but I have over 100 DVDs. Of course this is partly due to the fact that I'm a videophile/hometheater nut. ;)

      I agree with the parent's sentiment on bandwith, and I'll also point out the issues of latency and (lack of) service level guarantees. I'm not willing to sit through a movie that skips or pauses randomly. I'm also not willing to wait for it to cache. I'm more likely to go grab a disc from my collection. However, I might be willing to start a download in the morning if I'm sure I want to watch it at night. And I also agree with the parent: I'm also not willing to watch it on my computer. At least not until I get a projector and a decent enough soundcard to send a coax digital 6.1/7.1 signal to my thx ultra 2 receiver without interrupting the stream (even once).

      So basically the way I see it, HD-DVD is the only real threat to DVD, but I strongly suspect that HD-DVD will go the way of videodisc, betamax, laserdisc, minidisc and superbit CDs. There's just not enough "high end" market to justify the production of these items. To put it bluntly, as long as I can keep resampling my 480i DVDs to 960 via line and column doubling in my Sony Wega XBR, I really don't have any need for high definition DVDs!

      I guess my point is: I'm a videophile, and I'm willing to forego HD-DVD, so I can't see the general public saying "woah, I better go get the new 1080i version of the Matrix." That tells me that HD-DVD is probably going to be stillborn, and there's really no threat to DVD.

    3. Re:No freakin way by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      "own" is the key word here.

      *ducks*

  42. paperless office? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broadband killing off the DVD? Yeah, kinda like the paperless office, huh? Not going to happen.

  43. Death of physical media predected ... again by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are three reasons this is bunk:

    First, the idea that we will throw away out current media has been floated since the days of the floppy. It's always a correct prediction, but only because a better physical medium comes along.

    Second, the idea that we're going to be OK with just using storage on the Net and not having any physical media on which to store our data sounds good, right up until the first datacenter fire that loses me last week's data storage. It's also a terrible idea to keep your wares and copyrighted porn on someone else's servers ;-) and that bring us to:

    Third, PRIVACY. There's no single reason why networked media will never win over good-old local storage that beats the desire for privacy.

    1. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I abandoned floppy is my professors don't have it anymore.

      I still have floppy drives. I have a nice USB floppy. It might be my last, as long as my next machine will accept it.

    2. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "and not having any physical media on which to store our data sounds good, right up until the first datacenter fire that loses me last week's data storage."

      Not if its RAID-ed across the 'net.

      It doesn't have to be stored in one single place.
      You could have clusters of servers across the internet and any, say 4, of which can give you your data.

      Given enough redundant servers and its safe until the Big One.

      Privacy?

      You have your private key locally, don't you?

      The datastream could be encrypted right to the point where your viewing whatsit has your keyring plugged into it. Or your finger, or whatever.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      And you honestly believe there won't be any backdoors or skeleton keys to such a service?

    4. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      same applies to physical security.

      one can come up with paranoid scenarios to make any security measures seem pointless.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    5. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by mikael · · Score: 1

      Given enough redundant servers and its safe until the Big One.


      Which is when the water mains burst and the repair crew cut accidently through the cable while trying to find the source of the leak. And will be guaranteed to always happen on the evening you decide to have an quiet evening together with your spouse/partner.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      wireless?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    7. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I am fairly confident that my wife and I are the only ones with keys to my home and access to my computer. This remote storage business would be like me letting a maid have keys to my home and all my computer passwords. On top of that, she might have a secret prior arrangement with the government or a company to look through my drawers and files, collect my SS#, credit card numbers, receipts, and invoices, medical records, and whatnot for tasty information that can be used to advertise to me or profile me. This isn't paranoia: governments and business have been, are, and will continue to compile databases on people. No thanks. I'll pass.

    8. Re:Death of physical media predected ... again by ajs · · Score: 1
      "and not having any physical media on which to store our data sounds good, right up until the first datacenter fire that loses me last week's data storage."

      Not if its RAID-ed across the 'net.


      Oh good, now we don't even need a datacenter fire, since you've introduced a single point of failure!
      We at TrustUsWithYourMedia would like to appologize for the interruption of service. Our technitions tell us that, inside our new keen software GlobalRAID++, the parity calculations between highly redundant datacenters lost track of their table of contents or something like that... we don't understand what they said, but the net result is that we've lost 3 days of data, and nothing will be available for 3 days while we recover. However, we do want to point out that the corrupt data was written to both datacenters, and thus replicated perfectly!

      We understand that you had a lot of options, and we're very happy you chose our servi... uh... hello, is anyone out there? Hello...?
      Yay technology!
  44. Terrifying obscurity by dauthur · · Score: 0

    The last time I heard the name "laser disc" I think I was still reading Disney kindergarten books. Obscurity is right. It's just that with DVD's, you can use them as coasters, whereas you can use laser discs as plates or those... things you yell "pull" and shoot. Good southern fun.

  45. Yeah.... by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, and they said vinyl died.

    Mono vs Stereo.

  46. Obligatory by simpsone · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new broadband distribution overlords.

  47. Not just about bandwidth by NerdConspiracy · · Score: 1

    How about storage. It takes a lot of space to store a movie collection. People will still want to own the movies, no?

    Or is this dude predicting that everything will become pay-per-view? Or else people will go through the trouble of downloading a movie and then burning it onto some media which seems more hassle than just buying a DVD.

    I guess it all depends how far ahead you're looking, some day this will all become true, and we'll get flying cars too, but not any time soon IMHO.

    1. Re:Not just about bandwidth by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

      A 1.6TB Lacie "Bigger Disk" ought to see you in good stead, at least for a while :)

    2. Re:Not just about bandwidth by NerdConspiracy · · Score: 1

      Great, I've been thinking what to do with $3600 and buying a hard disk to keep a bunch of movies on is just perfect.

    3. Re:Not just about bandwidth by Kaemaril · · Score: 1

      Well, you'll get plenty of change out of $3600 if you go for 1.6TB, so go wild and splurge :)

    4. Re:Not just about bandwidth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... out of $3600 if you go for 1.6TB, so go wild and splurge
      splurge on two, since you'll need a backup when it heads south :)

  48. Things that broadband can't replace: by Pollux · · Score: 4, Informative

    1) Quality. Sorry, but DivX doesn't come close to quality. It works like an MP3 works: it's portable and playable, but it's not the best in terms of quality. I'd rather pop a DVD into my player and enjoy it with my wife on a 27" TV with a DTS surround sound system than have the two of us huddled around a 17" monitor and a pair of $20 speakers (sure, we could upgrade to surround on the PC, but 5-channel output is not programmed in DivX...but if I'm wrong on this, feel free to give me a swift kick to the mod points).

    2) Ease. Buy a player. Rent a DVD. Put it in. Play. And there's no crossing your fingers that it doesn't crash, no reconfiguring of the stupid screen saver to not interrupt the movie, and no stupid "remote control" that keeps getting in the way of playback every time the mouse gets bumped.

    3) Physical portability. MP3s finallybecame famous and widespread when you could move them around in a player no larger than a pack of cigarettes. Granted, DVD's are physically larger, but you can carry 20 DVD's in a portable CD-wallet...Come to think of it, I suppose you can do that now on some portable DivX players (100 min. movie = 700MB * 20 movies = 14 GB 20GB players). But DVD's are (right now) less cumbersome, but I don't think they'll stay that way for long.

    1. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by bacon55 · · Score: 1
      "But you're not thinking 4th Dimensionally" Lol, sorry to say but it's true. The idea is that broadband will be able to move so much more data, that the quality achievable in disks is easy to send over the net - fast. And you won't have to carry around anything, or store anything.

      That's the idea

      The real reasons it's not practical aren't the one's you mentioned. It's entirely possible that the network could be so streamlined that none of these current ENGINEERING issues are a problem.

      However, the simple facts of psychology killed this marketing ploy dead in the water.

    2. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by lightknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      1.) Divx is a video codec. AC3 is a sound codec (quite popular), and 5.1 surround sound.

      2.) Downloading a dozen movies requires less brainpower (for those who have done it before) then operating a large, sharp metal machine, driving it a quarter mile, and returning.

      3.) DIVX encoded movies fit more on a DVD than MPEG2 movies.

      But you make some good points.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Snommis · · Score: 1
      Couldn't have said it better, Pollux, but one addition:

      DVDs and their players are in widespread use, and once a standard is adopted, it takes a HUGE amount of time to move on, esp. once people invest heavily in it. Plus, usually these standards are adopted due to ease of use by the average dolt. Examples: floppy drives, VHS, passwords, AOL, Budweiser, the list goes on and on...

      --
      Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
    4. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      DivX doesn't come close to quality

      Well, that's a rather unintelligable sentence, but never the less...

      Divx is just one MPEG-4 codec, and pretty close to the worst of them all. There are far better MPEG-4 variants (Xvid is okay, but libavcodec is great).

      MPEG-4 is a lossy codec, just like MPEG-2 which is found on DVDs. MPEG-4 has the ability to be every bit at good as MPEG-2, at much lower bitrates. Now, if you're comparing a professionally made 9,000MB DVD to a 650MB amature Divx rip, it's obvious which one is going to look better.

      The MPEG-4 version can look just as good, at much lower bitrates, and it doesn't look like it'll take long before the next generation of video codecs will come around, and reduce the needed bandwidth even further.

      I'd rather pop a DVD into my player and enjoy it with my wife on a 27" TV with a DTS surround sound system than have the two of us huddled around a 17" monitor and a pair of $20 speakers

      This is a BS arguement. Spend $5 on a damn SVideo cable, and run it from your computer's videocard, to your TV (most decent videocards made in the past 5 years come with svideo output). Now, you can watch your non-DVD movies on your 27" TV just as easily as DVDs.

      In fact, I do exactly that, all the time... It's just a matter of typing one command to have the sound on your DVDs normalized to reasonable levels, so you can hear speech without getting blown away by the explosions. It's just another command to make your computer act as a progressive-scan player, too. And you've got millions of more options to chose from. You can even edit the thing, and show your kids a slightly sanitized version if you wish.

      I absolutely refuse to watch a DVD on a standalone DVD player anymore.

      Play. And there's no crossing your fingers that it doesn't crash, no reconfiguring of the stupid screen saver to not interrupt the movie

      That's a problem with Windows, so I've never experienced any such problems with my computer.

      and no stupid "remote control" that keeps getting in the way of playback every time the mouse gets bumped.

      A REAL remote control isn't very expensive. Then you can sit back, far away from your TV and computer, and still have control of things.

      3) I have no idea what you are trying to say, in that rant of yours.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend $5 on a damn SVideo cable, ...and $180 for a Hauppauge PVR-350, because the TV-out on most PC graphics cards suck phat cock. Or if motion blur is your cup of tea, nevermind me and toil.

    6. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Buy an Xbox, put Xbox Media Centre on it and your set. Its perhaps the more useful app for the Xbox ever written.

    7. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by BigZaphod · · Score: 1

      "I'd rather pop a DVD into my player and enjoy it with my wife on a 27" TV..."

      Why's your wife on the TV? That's sort of odd... I'd think it'd be much nicer if she was on the couch with you. But whatever floats your boat...

    8. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by danila · · Score: 1

      1) Quality. DivX does come as close to DVD quality as its users demand. People, who want to download movies determine the bitrate and quality of DivX. For everyone, who downloads a DivX today, a downloaded file is preferable to a physical copy on a DVD.

      2) Ease. With DivX today you need a computer and a vide player. All decent video players disable screensavers, power saving, windows stealing focus, etc. In the future you will buy a versatile digital player, plug it into the telephone line (or just rely on wireless), select the movie and play.

      3) If even you can see that your argument is idiotic, why include it? Or do you have an aversion to editing your own posts? And you can stream DVD quality video using wireless Internet, bringing you the ultimate in portability.

      People never change. They always keep thinking that today will last forever and tomorrow will never come...

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by techefnet · · Score: 0

      I could agree with you on point 3, but not 1 and 2. Quality is very much upon who encoded the divx, I'd say a 700mb xvid can be OK quality for the small size, but the 2*700mb then you really have good quality. And you can use what audio codec you want with divx, so that could also be AC3 or whatever..
      And you know you get DVD players with DivX/XviD support now?

    10. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Srikant · · Score: 1

      1. Not sure why you think this. I use a dedicated DivX player on my 10-foot front projection system with DTS/Dolby Digital Audio (with a decent JBL Northridge set of speakers) and it is only very slightly inferior to a DVD. I would find it amazing if you could make out the difference on only a 27" TV unless it is too heavily compressed.

      2. With a DivX player same applies.Can't rent DivX CDs easily though - not a problem if you are a student though - evrybody has their own library.

      3. I have a portable DivX player too (iRiver iMP-1100).

      --
      "The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible" - Albert Einstein
    11. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      1) SVideo sucks cock. Component or RGB Scart if you want a decent picture quality with DVD are the only options.

      2) As iTunes has comprehensively demonstrated, the media companies are unwilling to sell me an encrypted downloaded version of something for substantially less than the boxed product. Why would I bother downloading a film and spending a significant amount of time backing it up to a DVD-R (or whatever the equivalent will be) when there are these nicely packaged pre-pressed ones on sale?

      The mistake being made here is that Video is not Audio. I love my new iPod, because I can listen to my music anywhere, and cart a decent selection of it around in my pocket instead of deciding in advance what CDs to put in my bag. However, I don't watch films while shopping, nor do I watch them on a packed train.

      As much as I do love my iPod, I really do, if I want to listen to music at home I'll put the CD or record on, not play lossy-compressed files, because grabbing it off the shelf isn't inconvenient. Grabbing a DVD off the shelf isn't, either.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    12. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      1) Quality. Sorry, but DivX doesn't come close to quality.

      I have 10 Mbps connection. Sorry, but downloading a DVD image takes an evening for me. ;-)

      2) Ease. Buy a player. Rent a DVD. Put it in. Play.

      1. Connect your video out from your media PC.
      2. Download a movie.
      3. Run.
      4. Watch.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      SVideo isn't that bad, but look into devices like the D-Link DSM-320. It has component video output (and a myriad of digital audio outputs) and can stream all your movies from a central computer (just another machine on the network) to the player hooked to the TV. I make *GOOD* rips of my DVD's, stick them on a 250gb hard drive on my Windows machine, and poof. I've got a box in the living room, outputting to the TV, controllable by a real remote, that I can browse through all my movies with and just click on watch.

      I still like having the originals as backups (and I buy 30-40 DVD's per year), but in ways I do think that the concept of having a personal central server and several thin-client access devices (like streaming media set-top boxes) has a lot of merit.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    14. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how will you access a movie in areas without broadband? I doubt you can get 100% broadband coverage of the earth including all aircraft. With a DVD you can get a portable DVD player or laptop and watch your movies anytime but with broadband delivery you are limited to where you can watch movies.

    15. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      That sounds like a nice setup you've got there, but for me it would be a _lot_ of work to rip 500+ DVDs in good quality, not to mention the expense.

      The main thing is that I much prefer browsing a big pile of boxes on the shelf to reading a list on a screen, I suppose.

      Still, there's plenty of room in the market for us both.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    16. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      the TV-out on most PC graphics cards suck

      The SVideo out on any ATI/Nvidia cards produced in the past 5+ years is sure to be as good or better than your el-cheapo DVD player.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    17. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Component or RGB Scart if you want a decent picture quality with DVD are the only options.

      This is really pointless. We are talking about DVDs played on a 27" TV, not a bigscreen, and not HDTV. SVideo is going to be perfectly able to carry as much quality as the TV is able to display. We aren't talking about the uber-quality home theatre setup here.

      the media companies are unwilling to sell me an encrypted downloaded version of something for substantially less than the boxed product

      You can't use one example (from another industry even) as a rule. It's entirely possible they will have nice low prices, and arguing about price, before prices have been set, is pointless.

      grabbing it off the shelf isn't inconvenient.

      But you don't have every movie ever made on your shelf, so the question is if this system will be more convenient than going out and buying the DVD in the first place.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    18. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      I don't have every movie ever made on my shelf, but I do have most of the ones I wish to watch. It isn't a huge amount of effort to order stuff off the net and have it turn up, then place it on my unwatched pile.

      If the download takes overnight (and it does at the moment if I download a TV episode I missed) then I'm removing the spontenaity anyway.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    19. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      If the download takes overnight (and it does at the moment if I download a TV episode I missed)

      What are you on, a modem?

      Even the slower broadband connections can handle 900Kbps down, which is enough that you would just have to cache a few seconds of video, and can start playback right away.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'm on 512k ADSL, which in the UK is considered pretty fast. No idea where you are that 900k is considered slow.

      So it takes me a couple of hours to download a 350mb Smallville episode from Usenet, to use a random example. Which means around 4 hours or more for a full-length film.

      Even ignoring that I've got to convert it to crummy VCD if I want to play it on my DVD player (since none of my DVD encoding programs seem to do a reliable job with xvids), I'd rather just order the legitimate disc. I'm sure as hell not paying for the privilege of burning my own.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    21. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I've got to convert it to crummy VCD if I want to play it on my DVD player

      VCD is very low quality, but SVCD is nearly DVD quality, and can play in just about any DVD player that handles VCDs.

      (since none of my DVD encoding programs seem to do a reliable job with xvids)

      The fact that you haven't found a program to do it, is not a real limitation, but an imagined one.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      Actually, the real limitation is that a decent MPEG2 encoder that will work from DIVX (needed for either SVCD or DVD, and my DVD player has sound synch issues with SVCDs anyway) costs more than a new player that actually understands DIVX files, so I've just never bothered...

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    23. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by evilviper · · Score: 1
      a decent MPEG2 encoder that will work from DIVX [..] costs more than a new player

      Once again, just because you haven't found one, doesn't make it a REAL problem.

      ffmpeg, mplayer, ffdshow, etc., all have very good quality MPEG-2 encoders, and have no problem encoding from MPEG-4 (Divx). Plus, libavcodec-based encoders are not just very high quality, but are the fastest around.

      So what is your complaint?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:Things that broadband can't replace: by iainl · · Score: 1

      I guess my complaint is that I'd never heard of those things. I'll give them a try - thanks! All the DIVX to DVD solutions I'd seen were around the £40 mark, while a cheap DIVX standalone player was only £35, so I just hadn't bothered.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  49. No. by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

    Market penetration for DVD's is too common to simply fade away quickly. Also, it has proven a convenient medium of distribution for data that a copyright holder wants to maintian some control over.

    Things to keep in mind:

    DVD's do not require an internet connection to work.
    DVD's are portable (watching a movie on a laptop during a flight?)
    DVD's are not lost when your hard drive fails.
    DVD's are paid for once.

    I think that DVD's will continue to be the medium of choice for poeple that buy movies. But for renting movies, DVD's will be replaced by on-demand downloading.

  50. Uhhh, Consider the Source by bacon55 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    http://www.alcatel.com/ http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_02 /b3865705.htm *ahem* I don't think this really needs discussing any further. People have interests, these interests are financial - people will say things to support these financial interests. Obviously the CEO of a NETWORK company would like to convince people that physical storage of data is a thing of the past.

  51. They need to drop the price of DL discs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otherwise, they'll get supplanted too quickly by newer formats. Right now my best local deal is 3 Memorex for US$20.

  52. Short answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no. Next question?

    Longer answer: people like to have things they can hold and touch. They like to know that this is movie X, this is movie Y, this is TV show Z. There's something about having a physical collection of stuff lined up on the shelf.

    Ebooks haven't taken over from paperbacks yet; nor will they until the ebooks experience is markedly superior to paperbacks. For me, that means having nice, crisp text; no need to worry about loss of power preventing from reading my books whenever I want; and the knowledge that I won't lose my books just because some chip decided to corrupt them.

    Likewise, broadband distribution of movies will only displace DVD when you can get a movie quickly; when the quality is at least on par with, preferably superior to, DVD; when the price is reasonable; and when you can be certain that your hard-earned money isn't going to be wasted if some random chip renders the movie unwatchable for whatever reason. It's the speed and price, and not losing access to the movie, that are the likely sticking points in the near term.

  53. Disc Space and... by jIyajbe · · Score: 1

    I dunno about others, but I like having the physical disks (DVD and CD). I have a CD changer, and a DVD changer, so the movies and music are stored, and easy to get to, but not taking up hard drive space. Plus, I don't have to worry about losing everything if (when) a drive fails.

    Of course, I would back everything up...Then I'd have twice as much drive space being used, and I STILL have to worry about drive failures.

    Pfui. I prefer the original silver disks.

    --
    "Don't blame the log for the fire." --Andrew Ratshin
    1. Re:Disc Space and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of DVD changers..I've still yet to see one that can handle VCD, SVCD, AVI and WMA files..that's why I still use a single disk DVD player. I dunno why there aren't any changers with full compatibility since it's only a matter of the mechanism, not the electronics.

  54. I was thinking the other day... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    ...that media format no longer matter. At least for me. I have personal data going back to 1985 that I've migrated from floppies, to HDs, to CD-Rs and now to HD arrays and DVDs. The point is that the data is the only thing that matters. This is true of non-personal content as well. As long as the content is in a standard protocol (MPEG, MP3, AAC, FLAC, Vorbis, Theora, etc...) it doesnt' matter what it's stored on. Unfortunately, a lot of people out there still have this bizarre attachment to physical media. Once they get over that (another generation or two) and once the wireless bandwidth ANYWHERE is on the order of about 1 gigbit or better, this wil die out. The main thing that needs to happen is for people to know what a standard format is. Back in the 80s when I was doing a lot of electronic music composition, I chose to use MIDI files to store my performances rather than the proprietary song formats my sequencing programs offered. I did this because I knew that I would have to keep this data alive for decades. And it's worked. Today, all of the music I've composed and saved in MIDI files (not the cheap cheezy crap your browser plays, but MIDI files that play my pro audio offboard Roland/Emu gear) dating back to 1985 are stored on my drive array on the home server. Many of the files were created on Macs, Atari STs and then some on PCs in the 90s. Now I can open any of those songs in Rosegarden under Linux. Same thing with the MPEG2 files I record TV with today. I will still be able to view them 40 years from now. Choose your data protocols wisely and your data will live or at worst be easily converted for eternity.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  55. I hope so by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 1

    The last few times I have rented DVDs from the video store, I have had trouble with the physical media. Scratches or whatever. The movie would play until about half way and then just 'hang'. Sometimes I could skip to a scene past the problem and see the rest of the film, but what a pain.

    I don't know how to download rips. I suppose I could figure it out but I am just not interested. Yes, I would be willing to pay to have a movie download over night to my Linux server or set-top-box. I can also see value-added services for browsing, previewing and directory searches being worth while.

    For me, the biggest issue is what kind of cripple-ware might be included with the downloaded movies. The last DVD I rented (A Perfect Storm) had trouble in the player so I popped it in my laptop. Warner Bros decided to include some special player with the DVD - downloaded and installed automatically and did not work well. I would have liked to just use my existing player, or boot into Linux and use Xine (or whatever).

    rambly post, I know.

  56. Change = pain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Digital media certainly hasn't killed off CDs yet, which have been around for a good bit longer than DVDs. People are finally starting to build up DVD collections, and grandma and grandpa just learned how to use the damned players.

  57. um... "skippy-discs?" by the_non_geek · · Score: 1

    DVD's actualy work.

  58. not just a fast connection! by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    But a *RELIABLE* one also. if you have the dvd it doesn't matter if you dsl/broadband is slow or dead.

    I'm amazed that people will use online only solutions for mission critical applications. I am aware of agency management software for insurance agents that is completely data offsite. If the dsl goes down, they would be playing solitare on the computers.

    eric

  59. wrong by Cannedbread · · Score: 1

    try playing a dvd from another country in your dvd player. the region codes will lock you out.

    1. Re:wrong by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      I am aware of region codes, but they can be beaten by a 25 minute rip/burn cycle and are not really an issue since i am talking about taking movies you own with you when you go places, such as friends houses or camping or whatever.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:wrong by palndrumm · · Score: 1

      In Australia these days it's probably harder to find a region-locked DVD player than a region-free one - as a consequence of just about everything coming out 6 months later and costing twice as much here as it does in the US or UK, everyone who knows anything about these things won't buy anything but region-free.

      And when you get right down to it, there's not that many DVD players out there that can't be made region-free by entering a code via the remote or flashing the firmware or some such thing...

    3. Re:wrong by Cannedbread · · Score: 1

      probably 99.9% of all people in the world are not ripping and reburning all of their dvds, nor are they reflashing the firmware of their dvd players.

    4. Re:wrong by MBGMorden · · Score: 1
      I think his point was that most of the DVD players in the stores there are already region free, and that the few that aren't can be made so by the geeks of the world (regular people will just take the thing back when their imported DVD's won't play. just think about how many Universal remotes you see repackaged in Wal-Mart because people couldn't figure out how to program them).

      There is also the issue that any legally sanctioned downloadable movies are going to have some form of DRM (unless the movie companies have a HUGE change of heart/mindset in the near future), so without going through the effort of cracking the file, you wouldn't be able to go next door and watch the file much less to another country.

      I think that DVD's are safe for the time being. Heck I've bought DVD's that I've never taken out of the shrinkwrap, just because I'd seen the movie elsewhere, thought it was good, and wanted it in my collection. Having a purely digital copy just doesn't give that same level of satisfaction.

      And yes I do use iTunes, but the situation there is different. I usually only want 1 or 2 tracks from a CD. For that I don't really even care about having the physical version because I don't care for the whole physical product (the album). The only cases where I'd want the whole CD (mostly on soundtracks) I buy the physical version. With movies you're getting (normally) a single work on the physical medium.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  60. Not in the UK... by Kaemaril · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article presupposes that broadband is 1) Available everywhere and 2) Unmetered

    In the UK at least, where BT's infrastructure seems to be roughly analogous to a whole lot of pieces of string and lots of tin cans, neither case is necessarily true. BT is currently implementing broadband caps (15gb is one of them... plenty for lots of email and webbrowsing, DVDs? Not so much). Whilst other companies are holding off sooner or later I see broadband once again being a metered service. Damn BT. Crap infrastructure and lack of investment. People are buying broadband with the promise of fast speeds, downloading music, always on access ... and then BT are blaming "heavy users" for doing exactly what they were told they could do and claiming the "greed" of people are forcing them to introduce these caps.

    Also, even people who download and then burn to DVD will sometimes want a nice case, a nice little booklet, and all the extra goodies some DVDs offer. I don't see the DVD going the way of the dinosaur anytime soon.

  61. Not a Chance by curufinwe741 · · Score: 1

    A couple reasons. First, the DVD wave has not yet even reached its crest. Laserdisks were never extremely popular, but it has been a few years since DVD sales first outnumbered VHS sales. DVD-R/RW drives are becoming less and less expensive, so The DVD as a form of storage media has yet to reach its full market potential. Also, there will always be a need for a physical form of data storage and transport, and so far there is nothing on the horizon to replace DVD's in popularity as a physical form of data storage.

  62. call me stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but with all the bittorrent hoopula I thought I'd try it out. Either I suck at finding torrent links that are actually valid or this whole infrastructure is creaky as hell.

    The many suggestions by luminaries have boiled down to: if the content is findable, organized and reasonably priced people will buy it instead of pirating it. I AGREE!! This "free" crap is a waste of my time and it's only twits in junior high, highschool and college or of otherwise juvenile bent who I guess don't value their time. Rips should be low-bandwidth, low resolution. Enough to see if you're at all interested in paying for the high quality stuff.

    1. Re:call me stupid by nilbog · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. My main question is - if your hypothetical was true - what is "reasonably priced?"

      --
      or else!
  63. Downloading song isn't the same as a movie by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    I can get a song on my 'broadband' connect (DSL, 1.5Mb/s down 256Kb/s up) in about 30 seconds on a bad day.

    If I tryed to download a DVD, let us be generous and say it's a single sided dual layer of data so what 9.4GB?

    That'd take what, a day or so?

    I don't know what 'broadband' these guys are talking about but until I can click a button and have a movie in a few seconds it will not stop me from using Netflix or buying a movie

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

    1. Re:Downloading song isn't the same as a movie by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      True. By the time you finish downloading the DVD, there is already a sequel to the movie.

      Previously on slashdot some argue that broadband companies haven't moved to 10Mbps or 100Mbps because that would quadruple your downloads legal or illegal. It's a conspiracy thing, I don't know if it's for real.

  64. If it kills off DVD... by jnavarre · · Score: 1

    ..I know I'm not buying the 3rd iteration of George Lucas's "Special Edition" mutations.

  65. maybe if hollywood can pull it's collective head.. by dubstar · · Score: 1

    ...out of it's collective ass, then using DVD media for content delivery may die off eventually. As it stands they're more interested in shackling any sort of new technologies that may benefit consumers than taking advantage of them. That said, I see DVD living a long a fruitful life. Mostly because content providers aren't willing to let go of 'the content'.

  66. not yet by iduno · · Score: 1

    The Internet is still way off being suitable for viewing any decent video. Any sites that have streaming video are extremely poor quality. To view anything decent it needs to get to at least digital tv quality which requires around 15-25 Mbit for viewing. Here in Australia we can currently get 8 Mbit adsl2 Internet right now (will go up to 12 Mbit in the next year or two then to 25 Mbit in a few years) but we get limited to the amount we can download at high speed ($50 for 20 GB per month or $90 for 80 GB). This means that streaming at high speed would cost more than its worth at the present plus needing to pay for each individual movie would make it cheaper to simply rent it from the vid store for $2/movie.

  67. Two words: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?



    Who cares?

  68. Just like "licensing" music by harvey_peterson · · Score: 0

    This is the same thing that the music companies tried with digital media. They thought that people would be happy licensing music for a short period of time. Turns out that, for consumers, a big part of music and movies is the idea of "owning" it. Not in the copyright sense, but in the physical media sense.

    Here's an idea: when someone spends money on something, they want something that they can take home with them, that they can show off in a library, that they can say is theirs.

  69. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broadband has already done wonders for the porn industry...

  70. Not until you can package broadband by jmc · · Score: 1

    Broadband is ephemeral, flakey, and not something you can neatly package up to hold, stare at, and share. I think there's something ingrained in our human DNA that demands we're able to hold something we call 'mine'.

    I've become addicted to buying DVD sets as presents for just about any occasion. It seems there's a DVD set out there perfectly tailored for just about everyone I know. There's just something awesome about buying someone a complete season of a show they love, nicely packaged up with liner notes and all.

  71. newspapers and magazines and MAIL r gone right?? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    i mean look at newspapers and magazines and mail, they're all gone now right? they disappeared years ago didn't they?

    who the hell is this guy? he's a freakin loon.

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  72. Movies on Demand by KrackHouse · · Score: 3, Informative

    I can rent high definition movies through my cable box and pause, rewind, etc. No Blu-Ray or HD-DVD player required. Net distribution is beating the hardware version for the first time. Plus I can't (theoretically of course) use DVD-Decrypter to backup a bunch of movies to my computer which is plugged into my HDTV (1280x720progressive if you're curious). It makes Netflix' distribution model look archaic.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
    1. Re:Movies on Demand by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I can rent high definition movies through my cable box and pause, rewind, etc.

      No, what you can 'rent' is whatever they feel like offering up. Good luck EVER finding a fraction of the titles Netflix has available. Sure, you'll see the massively advertised blockbuster movies, but if you're interested in more than that, you're out of luck.

      Net distribution is beating the hardware version for the first time.

      No, you could download DVD-quality movies from the net long before DVDs came along. You could download high-def movies long before any 'On Demand' service came along. So, no, it's not the first time.

      Plus, it's a lot closer to good ole TV wating, than renting/buying a movie, and can barely be called "Net distribution".

      It makes Netflix' distribution model look archaic.

      Funny... with Netflix I can watch a movie 50 times if I want to, let friends borrow it for a week, get some screenshots, etc., and before you say you can do that too, remember that it's actually legal with a rented DVD.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Movies on Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once physical media is gone, how long will it be before all movies are pay-per-view and all music is pay-per-listen? My guess is not long, on top of that, it's also going to be expensive as hell and the average person won't be able to afford it.

  73. Because American broadband sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Broadband is not everywhere yet, and never will be.

    If American cable companies have their way, you'll be right. Just because Americans are stuck buying little plastic disks doesn't mean Japan or Korea will though. How long has 1-3 Mb/s been considered "high speed" in America now? How many YEARS? What happened to progress? By the time average Americans get to 10 Mb/s, the rest of the civilized world will be getting gigabit connections.

  74. The Real Measure of the Question is... by bigt_littleodd · · Score: 1


    ...how many times can George Lucas re-re-re-re-release Star Wars on any given format?

    --
    Let's play Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. I'll be Pestilence.
  75. Dvd's are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like CD's would instantly kill cassette. Hang on, let me turn over the one in my WALKMAN....

  76. Paper Hats to replace Tinfoil! by ajservo · · Score: 1

    They're more plentiful, cheaper to produce, more resistant to crushing by the men in black, and Homeland Security sez it blocks all of their transmissions!

    Paper hats will all be the new rage.

    Tinfoil hats will simply go the way of the pocket protector and the stereotype of the nerd.

  77. Console gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about console gaming? I don't see DVD or disc media going away any time too soon.

  78. New Power Source will replace Gasoline! by blank · · Score: 1

    You should write the article. It doesn't even have to contain any content. The editors and most of the readers won't bother reading the article anway. Oh, mention how it'll kill Linux. Sensationalist headlines works here best.

    --

    bah. start over

  79. DVD will fade away, but not for those reasons. by tidewaterblues · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The DVD format will probably die out (and by DVD format, I mean the current DVDs and all their logical sucessors, like BlueRay, etc). It will not be convienence of broadband that will kill them, however, it will be our changing consumption habits.

    When my parents first starting buying CDs in the 80's (they were around $25.00/disk then) they accumulated them carefully, picking what they like, and checking carefully that what they were buying coresponded directly to the LP orignals they were used to. They listened to them one at a time in an old Pioneer CD player (25+ lbs, lasted over 20 years before it died). By contrast I, and others I know, like to have our music quickly. I find and download files, burn tracks, buy CDs on a whim, digitize them and deemand that they all be available to us at once on small portable MP3 players. I keep my music on my laptop and it follows me wherever I go. My parents and I use music in fundamentally different ways, and we expect different things from our music.

    The same thing will happen with DVDs. The easier something is to use the more people will use it. The day will come when our culture comsumes such a quantity and variety of media that streaming, downloaded, or otherwise transmited movies will make much more sense for our livestyles. We will wants LOTS of movies, want them now, and want them everywhere we go. DVDs are nice, but they are also bulky. Our whole collection can't travel with us around the globe or fit in a hand-held player, or a car theater system. But these things are in development and in small circles in active use. These lifestyle changes will be the driving force toward a new file-less format.

    That doesn't mean that disk are dead. That day will come when we have a 100% reliable, superfast, globally accessable storage and transmission network that you could feel cofortable uploading media to and knowing that it would still be there is a couple of centures. (I'm not holding my breath). Until then there must always be a hardcopy of some kind, if only because encodings change so quickly that we need a "master" to rip from.

    --


    ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
  80. Wouldn't that be Discraft? by jfengel · · Score: 1

    No, wait, that's for frisbees. They're not going anywhere.

    (Yeah, I know Discraft makes "flying disks" and "frisbee" is a name brand. It's funnier the way I wrote it.)

  81. Out with the old, in with the new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If broadband takes over DVD companies, FREE PORNO FOR EVERYBODY!

  82. Bahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it takes too long to download a full DVD movie

    and in case the author hasnt notice, there are tons of us that can't even get DSL or Cable modem and we're in big major cities.

  83. frogs dont no shizzle by weldon416 · · Score: 1

    damn frogs dont know anything at all, we have never relied on them for any real info, besides how to lose a war or not support allies.

  84. 4 letters for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I P T V

  85. Yes, all physical media are going away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    There are two barriers to overcome: bandwidth, and content distribution control. Bandwidth is just a technology issue and it's going to be solved in the next few years. Fiber to the home, better DSL alternatives, and even high-bandwidth radio technologies (Wimax) are all going to solve the bandwidth issue.

    Content control is as much of a psychological issue as it is a technology issue. Decision-makers at content companies (movie studios in this case) need to overcome their fear of digital transmission. They were OK with DVDs because of CSS, but in the end, you can buy "unlicensed" DVDs for $1 each in many parts of the world, and CSS didn't do anything to prevent this. So the studios couldn't end up being any worse-off than they are now, but psychologically, they may not be able to see this. What they really should do is adopt the Netflix type pricing model and just say "watch movies all you want for $20 a month." If it's convenient most people would rather pay $20 than try to find and distribute unlicensed copies.

    But those barriers will both fall. Technology is like the tide; you can resist it but it will eventually get its way.

  86. No Details All Assumptions Article by AC5398 · · Score: 1

    The article makes a lot of assumptions, provides no details, and is meant to be a two paragraph filler piece at best.

    I wouldn't mind reading a good article about how broadband will kill off dvds, but this ain't it.

  87. That depends by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    if by Broadband you mean High Speed Internet Connections with peer to peer file sharing networks, then I would say yes. It seems movies these days are released to P2P file sharing networks before they are released to the DVD format. Usually by someone with a video camera, and a video capture device on their computer.

    Of course the Internet Pirate versions of the movies are of a poorer quality than the movies, but most people do not care because it is free.

    The MPAA needs to wake-up and start their own movie-sharing network and charge per month or per file for access to it. I know they are trying to use digital film to replace the celluloid reels, but why not go all the way and use a digital file format?

    If people have DVD burners, give them a chance to burn the movie to a DVD with subtitles, menus, etc. Maybe limit this ability or something.

    Of course you know that the Cable and Satelite TV services are going to lose a lot of business to Broadband file sharing networks, as TV shows, etc are being shared as well. Why not offer a service for their Broadband users to download TV shows, movies, etc to their broadband computers for customers who own both a Broadband connection and a subscription to Cable or Satelite TV?

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  88. One possible way: lifetime rights to virtual dvds by mattr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I first thought "No" but how about this idea.

    A lifetime liscense to a virtual DVD, backed by the right to make personal copies and make unlimited downloads with copyright fees waived.

    You can have your DVD and buy it in a brick and mortar store if you want to drive there and pay for their overhead. You can get a physical DVD like now but you are also paying for pressing, color printing, distribution and inventory costs.

    You can download to your hard disk but don't have to worry about burning it at home, though you would be able to do so for all content with open source tools, nor do you have to worry about renting a data center or keeping a RAID jukebox in the basement.

    Your purchase would give you a transferable, resaleable, unlimited right to the product, for all resolutions/file sizes up to that of the purchased product, though you might have to pay a one-time encoding fee if the format you desire is not on the publisher's server.

    You could likewise easily order rights to various printed materials, audio interviews, bromides, "making of shows", television versions, etc. linked to it, whether by the same publisher/distributor or not (thanks to automated searching over google, blog listings, or other mechanisms). Some people may opt to only purchase time-limited liscenses but smart people will go for a "lifetime" or better yet perpetual liscense, and no company except maybe the biggest mega studio will begrudge it, considering that if they have higher quality masters they can remaster for even better than DVD quality.

    To me this is far superior to what is currently available. The current problem is you do not know when the DVD you buy will deteriorate, and publishers similarly have ticking time bombs. I don't happen to use DVDs but I do buy the same books over again.. just like I rent the same VHS tapes many times, and know I can do so again for a few bucks even if my player eats one (happened before), I have bought the same (scifi) books many times over the years as I move around and am unable to carry them all with me. So I would definitely pay for a lifetime right to a work, plus the guarantee of durability.

    Such a system would also allow us to show dvds to friends or trade with them at no charge. In fact I believe it would be cheaper to have no copy protection at all, and simply guarantee that a given customer id would always be able to get a fresh copy of a work, even if issued by someone else. We would all win.

    I envision studios making a deal with insurance companies to put digital masters in escrow, and one day these will all end up in one place and accessible freely to the public (when copyright expires) minus perhaps distribution fees (if indeed the fee is not negligible by then). When you consider that even TV is going or has gone digital, but there is just too much of it to archive or it has been too hard to do so, you can easily envision the same system being applied to TV and other media. Also considering the costs that broadcasters will have to pay to go digital, this is a good way to finance it (better than the hostile takeover being financed by U.S. a securities company that is being played out in Japan this past week).

    I have been waiting an awfully long time to be able to access past years of TV shows and if I can easily "bookmark" a scene I am watching on live TV instead of rushing to hit the record button and missing bits of it, that would be worthwhile. Then a whole genre of websites would spring up to index the shows and scenes that could be accessed, and we would be bathed in a real digital ocean of our shared cultural history, which would be as broad as the entire world and as deep as the earliest decades for which the media have survived.

    In this vision, broadband access to the Internet could indeed be said to have beaten the dvd, itself an evanescent instantiation of a physical specification, since broadband will ensure that the physical item you purchase and treasure will remain with you for the years to come.

  89. Yes but not how they think! by ylikone · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently cancelled my cable TV and digital cable box but kept my high-speed cable internet. I rented a few "on-demand" movies but it was not that great, as the fast-forward and rewind were really slow and the responsiveness of stop/play was laggy. Anyway, yeah, broadband might eliminate DVD rental places... but only because I'm downloading movies off the internet and burning them to DVD myself. heh.

    --
    Meh.
  90. Multiple CD installs are being turned into DVDs by me+at+werk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My UT2k4 copy is on DVD. Yes, you can buy it on 6 cds, but WHY? World of Warcraft is currently on 4 CDs, and there's no DVD version (the Collectors Edition shipped with 4 cds and a dvd) available.

    DVD is currently becoming the new cd 'standard' for sharing software. Families are distributing home movies on it at christmas (at least, ones I know are) and people are starting to backup to it. Heck, you can get Encarta or Wikipedia (soon) on DVD. The benefits of dvd for software are not going to go away just because you can download movies over broadband now (while almost half of the country still sits on dialup and with major broadband isps not looking to expand there...), so I am quite sure it'll stay around for some time.

    Plus, there's those new DVD-Audio type things sound like they'd sound great, although I don't know if I'd notice the higher quality as much as the surround sound. I don't know (currently) of any software that could play them in my computer, either :(

    --
    For context, click Parent.
  91. people are different.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone is different, some people like to have the actual cd or dvd in their possession and some people are content having the audio or video on their computer.

    It's kinda like the pack rats vs. the disposable hero's....some people want to hold onto something forever and some don't.

  92. No bloody way by Spacejock · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. I treasure my boxed sets of old UK television shows. I like to have and to hold, and having them available any time for a fee is NOT the same as choosing, buying, owning.

    2. When my ADSL connection goes wonky and I can't get on the net I pop in a DVD and waste some time waiting for it to come back up. If they deliver my entertainment over ADSL I'm going to be foaming at the mouth when the damn thing falls over.

    3. I will never put all my eggs in one basket.

    4. I can browse DVDs on the shelf and pick up a couple when shopping. On the net I'm already bombarded with crap so how am I going to choose what to watch? Sometimes all you need is 3 bad movies and 1 good one to decide what to watch.

    5. Never underestimate the power of impulse buying and a physical product. Many dotcoms did exactly that.

    1. Re:No bloody way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      3. I will never put all my eggs in one basket.


      You have multiple copies of the media, then. In multiple locations. Right?

      Or, if someone breaks in, you lose everything?

  93. Not everyone has the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in a small town in Montana. Many of my real-world friends don't have the internet, or a computer, some of them don't even have a phone. However even the ones without phones have a television and a DVD player (I'm the only person I know who doesn't have a television). Traditional television-based entertainment is much more widespread than computers and the internet, and it's going to take a long time before every home has both. The people who don't have the internet don't really care about it even if it is cheap and readily available. They're not interested no matter how cool everyone tells them the cyberweb is. However, everyone wants to watch TV and movies.

  94. CD's suck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How often do they release a CD with more then 3 good songs ? At least, the DVD contains ONE movie that I really want and would watch more then one time... the other thing is cost... the cost of a CD is too close to the cost of a DVD, why buy music when you could pay a little more and buy a movie you really enjoy ?

    1. Re:CD's suck! by WoodenRobot · · Score: 1

      With DVDs there's the possibility added bonus features such as behind-the-scenes documentaries or commentaries. A good example of this is with the Fight Club or Band Of Brothers DVDs. As far as I'm aware, a downloaded film will only have the film, not the extra audio tracks or the documentaries etc that come with a bought DVD. Sometimes (although rarely) a DVD is worth buying, since what you're getting is actually worth the money - they've actually taken their time and produced a good product.

      --
      ---
      "I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  95. Umm.. duh.. by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    Asking if DVDs will be replaced by broadband is like asking if distributing software on floppies will be replaced by distributing software on BBS's. The answer is yes to both being replaced. It never ends.

    Slashdot used to be a place to come and find good stories about legitimate tech/geek news items. Are things really so bland that all we have is filler?

  96. Rather bold... by TodPunk · · Score: 1

    I live in Utah. Orem, specifically. They say I'll have Utopia in the next couple months. For anyone that's not in the know, that's 100mbits up and down bandwidth. However, even though I could take some data to work an hour away, or want to send something to my friend in New York, it would still be faster and more reliable to just put the data on a DVD (if it's large) and ship it to them. Then the DVD is always there for them, as well.

    I still see DVD being much more used than this guy thinks for a couple years. Then when BlueRay or something else replaces it, it will probably die down then. Physical media will always have its uses.

    --
    This forum Sig is licensed under the LGPL.
  97. DVDs vs Music on the Internet. by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    When I first glanced at the topic, I was expecting another "The Internet with its peer to peer file sharing and broadband will kill the DVD industry just like it hurt record sales.

    I was suprised when I found out the culprit was legal downloading. It's nice to see the doomsayers make a little more sense.

    The Internet will never kill DVD ownership, but it might bite into the sales of rentals. An Internet connected set-top box capable of easily downloading and displaying a movie on a home theater system at DVD quality, if priced right, will make renting movies so much easier then going to a brick and mortar store that it's a no brainer that the video rental shop is going to see sour days ahead.

    But unlike music, the convenience of the Internet will never replace the private ownership of DVDs, because the video business is doing most things right that the record business does wrong. For one, DVDs are typically at a price point that is fair, considering the content. One would think that it would be a wakeup call to the music industry that a $9.99 DVD would sell well, while nobody would touch the $15.99 CD soundtrack of that movie. Even if filesharing of movies reached the level of music, people would still buy the $9.99 DVD, because if it's a decent movie, the price makes ownership worth it. Secondly, movies typically are either a quality piece of work or they're not. It's so common now that a new release CD contains only one or two songs worth listening to and 10-12 tracks that are filler. It makes more sense to the consumer to spend money on something that they know, as an entire piece of work, is all good. .

    Personally, I've only purchased 3 CDs in the last year (all used for ~$6.99), but some 30 DVDs, all new, and with a few exceptions, all under $22 dollars (most in the $10-$15 range). Even if I could get the movies direct to my TV for a few dollars cheaper, I like to own the whole thing. There's something about having the work sitting on a shelf, and the act of perusing one's collection deciding what you feel like. I would buy more CDs for the exact same reason, if I didn't feel like I was paying too much for what I get.

    The only segment of the DVD market I can see being effected by direct Internet downloads would be music video DVDs. I paid $35 for the Criterion Collection Beastie Boys DVD, and now that I have it (which is rarely put in the DVD player), I realize that while I wouldn't purchase another music video DVD, I would be willing to play a couple bucks to download single video (so as long as the quality of the sound and video was to par with DVDs, and as long as I could store it, copy it, and play it whenever I wanted. But ultimately, music video DVDs don't make up a significant enough market share for DVDs to dramatically effect the industry.

    This is all assuming that most consumers think the way I do.

    What will kill DVD sales? Another video format superior to DVDs which is likely to see mainstream acceptance in another 10-15 years. In the meantime I'll keep buying DVDs, even if I can find a good divx rip of the film for free on the Internet. I see no reason why charging for the work would make that different.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  98. Re:New Power Generation will replace Gasoline! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, is Prince still cool? Can I be on the front page of slashdot too? PLLLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASE????

  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  100. HAHAHAHA!!!! by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 3, Funny
    Look. It's 2005. OK? And I live in the MIDDLE OF FUCKING SAN FRANCISCO. Draw a big X over the city, and I live about 1500 feet west of that, roughly.

    I have Broadband - YOU FUCKIN BETCHA!!!!

    And what is my precious bandwidth?

    All of 326k!!!!

    Yep. And that's on a good night. Tonight is fucked -I'm barely pulling 280 right now.

    Now: it's 2005, and I can barely get 326 on DSL, thanks to SBC. And these clowns want to pump 1080i into my house? Even if you compress the living fuck out of it, you're still nowhere NEAR what I can do on DSL. And Cable is BETTER?

    Well, let's see: Cable's kind of dodgey around here, thanks to a 900 foot tall TV tower cluttered with all manner of telecommunications transmitters. My wife can't even open the door to her car with the remote...

    But: It's a Nice Place to Grow Yer Kids Up, only without the churches and liquor stores...

    So Cable sucks.

    And these clowns want to put HD over broadband.

    Bunch a' maroons I TELL YA!

    By the time I can get enough bandwidth into the Spoilsport rat hole to do that, I'll be too old to fuckin care, and it'll be TO HELL WITH THE LOT A YOU - YA YOUNG PUNKS!

    I'll be sittin' there with my DVD collection on my multi-terabyte RAID array entertainment computer, which will be in the form of the Lenovo Home Pro, which was sold to me for 99$ at Fry's 2 (the original was burned down 20 years earlier, during the food riots of 2015, during the second American Civil War.) and it frickin ROCKS - my entire music collection and video collection on a raid. I bought them, ripped then (there is NO perfect crypto) and now I get to see and hear whatever the fuck I want, when I want.

    but, I hate it when i get unstuck in time like that.

    And I'll still clean all the seeds out of my pot using the gatefold cover to "Close to the Edge" by Yes. Even when I'm 90.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!! by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      My, but that was an...energetic post. I live in the midwest, not San Francisco, and I get roughly 360K DSL. I live pretty far from the phone co, but even if I lived next door, 1.5M is the most I'd be able to get no matter how much I am willing to pay. Cable might be able to get me a megabit, unless my neighbors all use it.

      And they want to send HD TELEVISION down that line? SBC is out of their fucking minds. I can't download more than two files at once.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:HAHAHAHA!!!! by Chemical · · Score: 1

      I hear you, brother. I live in Oakland and I get 680kbps down on my DSL connection. I was getting around 320kbps but then I bitched to SBC and they came out and did something to make it go faster. Still, they tell me I'm "too far away from the CO" to get anything faster, even if I was willing to pay more. I don't buy this "too far away" crap. I don't live out in the wilderness of Montana. I live in the middle of a fairly large city! And the fastest I can get is 680kbps?

  101. quality guys, quality by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    I don't see how anything net-based could replace DVD (or b-ray, or hd-dvd etc) disk-based video distribution in the not-so-near future. Why ? Simple: quality.

    I wouldn't drop DVDs for anything with less quality, even if it would be a bit more comfortable to get, than going to the local DVD-store or order a DVD online. True, that good quality compression can be today achieved in less the filesize, but these techniques are not so widespread, as DVDs and MPEG2 are. Not until H-264 will be really ubiquitous (both in sw and hw players) will we have anything capable to deliver good enough quality in a size which will not take hours long to download even on "broad"band. I wouldn't want to download a movie and paying for it if
    a). it has worse quality than my DVDs or the HDTV movies on tv
    b). takes longer to get than going and buying or renting a disk
    c). won't stay on my collection just for a few hours/watchings/etc because of bull DRM applied.

    Besides these above, I mostly buy such movies on DVD which I consider classics - on many scales - but I still didn't manage to get some I wished, e.g. Blade Runner can't be bought in my region [dvd region that is] for years now. So what if the net-based movie rental company decided not to make available older movies: you'd be left with nothing. I don't want that. I might just be too paranoid with this, but today's businness practices tought me/us not to really trust _any_ company in the long term.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  102. The Switch by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    I've gone almost totally digital.

    No books (Damn textbooks), no radio, No TV, no CD's, No DVD's.

    Devices:
    Tungsten E - 32 megs of books, is A LOT OF BOOKS. One charge = about one read book, I get a lot of sci-fi short stories, a bunch of classics, the bible (I can look up quotes with find), william gibson (Though I own several copies I still enjoy the ebooks more). It's backlit for when I go out to smoke, or am lost at night :P

    Computer, DVD Burner for backups. I can encode with XVID from DVD when I want to. 240 gig SATA raid.

    Nomad Jukebox 3: In 1998 the iPod wasn't out yet (or it was only 10 Gigs) anyway it wasn't an option (And I still don't like it) This thing is 20 gigs. Fits in my pocket and it's TOUGH I took it for 6 months through asia. Lots of diffrent power sections, diffrent operating systems, it's got 24 hrs battery life. Line in and Line out optical and analogue. It's got all my music. My computer also has it all.

    A modded Xbox, now this is key, after I finish ripping a movie or Downloading it I can transfer it over the network and leave it on the Xbox or play it directly from my computer, I usually keep a few music vids and a movie on there just in case someone is curious and I don't have the ethernet plugged in. It plays DVD's which is useful since I still have about 200 Chinese Korean and Japanese movies I bought in Beijing when I was over there (Haggle you CAN get them for 75c it just takes patience). So I guess I'm not DVD free, and I have a stack of Operating Systems on my desk on DVD mandrake,Suse,Redhat etc.

    But mostly I never touch physical media...

  103. Re:Physicality -- Physical packaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I stick with CDs only when I'm actually interested in the release (album, single, whatever) for the basic features such as art, lyrics, and background information. Four great examples are Alice In Chains (Tripod) by Alice In Chains, Spiritual Machines by Our Lady Peace, The Downward Spiral by Nine Inch Nails, and Antichrist Superstar by Marilyn Manson. Musically Tripod was an OK album but the physical packaging including art and the green case made the investment more of a steal. I went so far as to get two copies because of how hard it was to find that green case. Spiritual Machines, The Downward Spiral, and Antichrist Superstar all had external protective cardboard cases and a full stapled lyrics/album insert (with atleast 10 pages of lyrics and atmosphere that added to the album). To me it felt like the artists didn't just put their time into the album but into the packaging itself.

    When most people buy a DVD they expect some extras and are willing to pay for special/collectors editions if the packaging merits it. Personally I think Audio CDs are going in the same direction only instead of focusing on additional "special features" artists are focusing on packaging. I know I'm not going to set down $16 for a jewel case with a folded slip of paper and 1982 style cd when I can get the same thing at home for under $11 including the cost of labels, jacket paper, and media using music from iTunes. If you want me to buy an audio cd put some effort into the entire package and make it worthwhile.

  104. The Death of DVD is inevitable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just not yet.

    My personal belief is that we are currently seeing the death of CDs right now and they'll still be around for at least another 10 to 20 years. CD are being replaced by AAC/MPEG3 files but the real killer will come from SACD/DVD-A or DVD-HD/BlueRay. I know both audio formats have had a rough start but I think they are going to be big in the next year or two. I'm betting on DVD-A for the long run. The big selling point is 5.1 audio but I personally appreciate the improved sound quality.

    DVD will see a quick death or at least as fast a pace as everyone is upgrading to HDTV. Blueray/DVD-HD will be a big upgrade for all those HDTV people.

    As long as physical media has a benefit then it will continue to sell. I still can't download full CD quality music, so I would rather purchase a disc instead. Downloading is great and I do purchase songs from iTunes every once in a while but I would never purchase an album from iTunes. I personally want the full CD audio instead. Hell I've only been purchasing SACD/Hybrids or DVD-A discs as of late.

  105. BROOKLYN-Laserdisc was never as viable as DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Laserdisc was no where NEVER as popular, viable or accepted as the DVD is. The Laserdisc player never reached sub $100 levels, and the quality of the media did not justify the size of the laserdisc - the size of a traditional record waxed LP platter.

    Making the argument that broadband will overtake DVD's is like saying that Cable television would stop people from renting videos and/or going to the movies, neither of which has happened, and the experience of a movie theater with perfect strangers enjoying a movie together will never be duplicated in a significant portion of the populace.

    Brooklyn.

  106. Let me rephrase that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I meant that I would not watch the movie rather than download it. Before as in preference, not in time.

  107. No DVDs At My House by lamz · · Score: 1

    We bought a satellite-based PVR in November 2001. We subscribe to the movie channels, and watch every good movie that is released. We have hardly seen a commercial in the past 4 years. No DVD player in my house.

    Can't wait until the iTunes Music Store starts selling movies.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  108. The real answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Broadband will replace DVDs when bloggers replace newspapers.

  109. Torrent is killing DVD by Ray+Alloc · · Score: 1

    So what ? Natural selection.

  110. Not with the Broadcast flag they don't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they (BigMedia(TM)) will oppose *any* form of media they cannot limit and control and proclaim it is dead.

    Secret recording of a joint MPAA/RIAA cabal:

    "DVDS? Why those pesky consumers insist on the right to use them more than once...the /nerve/!...and they *copy* them for data protection--how audacious! Stopping our meter from running! We must halt this limit on our avarice! We must eliminate hard copies of our wares. When the only source is controlled by us and cannot be captured, i.e. broadcast via the 'broadcast flag', we can run back to their wallet pulling out money time and again! [Howls of accord and rapture from the audience] Let's announce it: "DVDs are dead!" Why wait? Carpe diem...err...Carpe argentum! DVDs are dead, long live controllable ephermeral data streams...err...'consumer choice and flexibilty'...yeah, *that's it* yeah...choice.

  111. Awesome, by Klowner · · Score: 1

    Now, where's my broadband? /me continues waiting...

  112. Will broadband replace the DVD? by Mystic0 · · Score: 1

    Hmm... did 56K replace the CD?

  113. It's not DVD, it's physical media itself... by venomkid · · Score: 1

    Once information infrastructure becomes ubiquitous, once data pipelines are in the air all around us at all times, there will be no need for physical media.

    One will only need a receiver. "Codecs" will become the impediments/enablers of media consumption, just as physical media has enabled/disabled the media monopolies of today.

    Sure, one might cache some media on the reciever, but let's not split hairs. Transmission is where it's at. Or, rather, where it will be.

    --
    vk.
  114. Not with today's broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trend in broadband seems to be strictly controlling the upload speed for your typical residential line. I get nice download speeds, but 40Kb/sec won't cut it if I want to send my friends a full quality movie. It's a lot easier for them to just come over and grab the physical disk.

    Of course, in my own home, my wireless network is perfectly fast enough to watch a movie from a different computer than the one which hosts it. If that sort of bandwidth became common, then this whole thing seems a lot more practical.

  115. Um... by Ctrl+Alt+De1337 · · Score: 1

    If this were really true, why isn't Windows Media Center Edition flying off the shelves? I think this is fairly implausible since I don't think people will end up usign computers for everything. Buying a TV and a DVD player is a lot cheaper than buying a computer, so I think people will always use that to build an entertainment center off of, not a PC. Plus, these movies being downloaded via broadband will probably have some kind of DRM that prevents people from burning them to disc, or at least they will if a certain Media Center Edition OS producer has anything to say about it. In the end, I think the convenience gained of downloading movies via broadband does not outweigh the inconvenience of setting up a computer to do everything a TV does, especially considering the price differential.

  116. So you outsource your storage? WTF! by Fussen · · Score: 1

    What about the great glory of uncompressed high resolution 24/32/64/XYZ bit audio?

    Has anybody even thought of the possibility of someday actually using a medium that requires uncanny amounts of space, because the recording actually records the physical calculations of a drum stick hitting a snare through the friction of air and travelling to your ear?

    Sure nobody really talks about "Super Audio Compact Disc" because its "elite" format that has little equipment to playback and a really bizarre selection of titles to purchase, but it's something I could give as a present and feel estatic to recieve for a gift.

    It might not even be a laser-disc in the future, but whatever the massive storage medium it WILL require, If you can make it a collectors edition, and put it in a leather bound case with air-tight seals and holographic/print/data embedded pamphlet insert of the artist's entire creative process & world, then I choose the real world medium.

    Downloading is an alternate method of transportation. One that exists like spandex exists in the same world as silk.

    And I think the Ipod Shuffle is a rip off. It's a fad-crazy exploiting techno-fashion. You don't even have EQ control, let alone the ability to change the batteries.

  117. WANTED: spook-free tinfoil for new hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    France Surrenders......

    ....their media?? This smacks of a social-engineering effort to 'rid' us of our books, hard-copies, physical media so that we can eventually be spoonfed whatever 'they' want to feed to us. If history becomes inaccurate, they will change history to match. Orwell must be spinning right now.

  118. No way ... by elronxenu · · Score: 1
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a suitcase full of DVDs.

  119. Where are you going to store the data? by TheMCP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, so, let's pretend for a moment that *tomorrow* we magically all have the technology to download enormous video files of DVD quality in a reasonable time.

    Where are you going to put it?

    Okay, so you've got a nice fat hard disk on your computer. That's just great for storing your first 10 or 20 movies that you buy for delivery via network. But where do you store all this data after that?

    I have, at a guess, about 500 DVDs (and increasing rapidly), and really my collection isn't that big compared to a lot of my friends. That's 5 terabytes or more of data right there. Is everyone going to have to have a really big expensive server just to store their movies?

    And how are we going to back all that data up? It will have to be backed up if the files are purchased, or when the server crashes the owner will lose their entire (very expensive) video collection. High capacity backup systems are not cheap or easy, and whatever solution is selected has to be simple enough that grammaw can use it after a 2 minute lesson or it won't catch on. Heck, I'm not at all sure that the entire concept of backups isn't too much for a lot of consumers to cope with. I suspect in a few years after recent model macs are finally gettting old enough to experience hard disk failure, there are going to be a lot of irate Itunes Store users who didn't heed the application's advice to back up their music.

    No, we need a physical media format to be around for a while longer, until storage space is very very cheap and reliable (cheap enough that we can all have an enormous RAID array on our PVR) and easy to manage.

    1. Re:Where are you going to store the data? by Thundersnatch · · Score: 1
      ...cheap enough that we can all have an enormous RAID array on our PVR...

      Let me say it loudly for the other non-sysadmins out there:

      RAID != BACKUP

      You still need backups (stored off-site) to protect you from things like:

      • accidental deletion
      • software-based data corruption
      • fire
      • flood
      • theft
      • failure of your RAID controller when a compatible contoller is no longer available in the market
    2. Re:Where are you going to store the data? by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      My take on all of this is that Broadband is unlikely to kill off DVD, mainly for the reason you and others state in one way or another: people like to own things. This is somewhat emotional, but to a large degree it is because owning something gives it permanence. Having bits on a computer somewhere lacks this.

      However, Broadband might (heck I say will, eventually), kill the movie rental market. When you rent, you have no expectation of permanence. The question then becomes will people want 2 formats: one for purchase (a hardcopy), and one for rental (bits somewhere). As long as the cost is low enough for the hardware, this won't be a problem.

    3. Re:Where are you going to store the data? by ntr0py · · Score: 1

      This is precisely what I've been saying ever since this whole fascination with "on demand broadband" started. I watch a lot of downloaded movies, yet I do not have a MythTV box or any sort of Linux media server (aside from the TiVo) attached to my TV. Instead, I bought a DVP-642 DVD player for $70 that plays pretty much any file format that will fit on a DVD or CD. Now my only investment into "storage solutions" is a bunch of DVD-Rs and a DVD recorder.

      C'mon, slashdotters, think about it. You're always touting "distributed" this and denigrating "centralized" that, and this is the perfect example. DVDs provide distributed storage, without a central point of failure, and the cost per gigabyte of storage capacity is consistent (and dropping). Can that be said for a central "media server"? And, like the parent pointed out, the average consumer barely knows what the word "backup" means.

      So, my advice to you, my movie pirate ^W^W media consumer friend, is to buy a DVP-642, a DVD burner, and a Usenet account, and don't worry about storage again until we have it ultimately "figured out."

    4. Re:Where are you going to store the data? by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to put it?

      I believe the idea is that you don't put it anywhere. The data is stored elsewhere and you just watch it. You would be able to pause, rewind and all the usual TiVo (or more traditionally VCR) features so the stream might be cached locally to make those features easier to provide. They could follow the model used by Audible.com and have the content you purchased available to stream whenever and wherever you might be. If the price were right and you felt comfortable that the provider company would be able to fulfill its function then it might be an attractive option.

      At this point downloading is a challenge for the network so this sort of conjecture only applies some time in the future.

    5. Re:Where are you going to store the data? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Depending on the market, between 80% and 90% of restores form backup are needed because of user error, not hardware failure. I've yet to see the RAID that can protect me from myself. Now, if versioning filesystems become fashionable again ...

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  120. laserdisc by colombianbrew · · Score: 1

    Laserdisc is not dead! I used one today at work (no joke)

  121. Broadband is the new viagra. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Broadband is not everywhere yet, and never will be."

    Are you sure? I'm always hearing how the Internet will solve whatever problem Slashdotters don't care to face. Don't like big business? Internet! Don't like big government? Internet! Have a small penis? Internet.

  122. third world ? by rahulkumarjha · · Score: 1

    that may be the case...but one must also take into account developing countries like India where a large proportion of computer users still don't have access to true broadband...

  123. Speaking of Collecting Movies.... by crazymandias · · Score: 1

    Mark Cuban recently blogged about buying movies as prints. Sure, they're 700 bucks a pop but the concept is interesting. http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000710024187 / Quoting from his post: "Picking on Hollywood some more... There is always a reason why their transition to new technologies has been slow. One of the repetitive themes is that there is a big risk in having a digital copy of a program or movie available because the quality is nearly as good as the original. That fear brought us the stupidity of the Broadcast Flag. It brought threats not to offer programming in High Def. Not that long ago, it was a threat not to offer programming and movies on DVD! All for fear of near original quality hitting the masses. So imagine my suprise when I go to the newstand and pick up a magazine that I won't name, and I see ads for pristine 35mm prints of newer movies that have yet to be released on DVD. I have been buying this same publication for the past 6 years. I started buying it not because I'm a movie collector, but because during the broadcast.com days, it was a great source of public domain movies and programs that we would host for streaming."

    --
    Pop Culture Theme Quizzes posted onto my blog. Have fun.
  124. Baloney... by hawkeye · · Score: 1

    Sure bandwidth will...eventually...be ubiquitous and plentiful, but we've a ways to go before we'll be streaming MPEG2 at DVD speeds over the typical broadband link.

    Sure MPEG4, H.264 and other standards will make it possible to cram more into less bandwidth, but we've got a few years before FTTH (Fiber to the Home) makes this a true possibility. Or, perhaps, Wimax will make it there first? I'm not counting on the telcos, in the US, to expand the bandwidth they provide, significantly, in the near future...that's for sure!!!

    Cheers,

    - hawkeye

    --
    "...The smart and lazy ones I make my commanders." - Erwin Rommel
  125. Kill? Doubt it. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Broadband to kill DVDs? No no... Broadband spawns DVDs. Broadband + Usenet + DVD burner = Wachow! Here comes the MPAA gestapo with their shocksticks at the ready!

    Seriously though folks, Piracy Bad(TM)! But if they want to come after me for downloading movies in 1080i HDTV (If you've never done it, you have no idea...*drool*) that I own on DVD, or DVDs of movies I own on VHS... They're welcome to.

    I really should stop trying to encite them though... My livingroom (Read: Ample seating and a DLP projector) has 'unauthorized exhibition' written all over it as it is. :P

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  126. Modded down by... by skogs · · Score: 1

    a frenchman I am sure. Like you can really argue that broadband will be everywhere, and that there will never be any need in the near future for actual, physical data. Stupid frenchman.

    --
    Who is this that even the wind and the waves obey Him? Surely this computer must submit also!
    1. Re:Modded down by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > a frenchman I am sure.

      You may find a good psychiatrist near you:
      http://panicdisorder.about.com/cs/medication /ht/fi ndpsych.htm
      They can help with your paranoia. But with your stupidity, just find a school.

  127. ubiquitous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hell, I just got my first DVD player last weekend ($10 at goodwill, suck it DVD-CCA), finally allowing the wife's pestering to overcome my abhorrence of the MPAA. Went to the Hollywood Video across the street and was shocked by *how* *much* *stuff* is still unavailable on DVD.

    Needless to say I'm keeping the VHS machine for a while longer..

  128. With some exceptions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Replying to my own post... There is still one area where physical media are going to be needed for a long time: situations where the infrastructure is not adequately developed. Most of the world is still using dialup. Plain old DSL is many years away for large parts of the world. Super-bandwidth DSL may be more than a decade away, while physical media costs and duplication costs are already very cheap and getting cheaper. So my comments in the parent post apply only in the more "city" parts of the developed world.

  129. this is correct by NimNar · · Score: 0

    The main advantage to direct download of video content for distributors is that will have much more control over where and how many times their media is played. Via various encryption schemes that would require you providing a personal key, they could charge you per play, could restrict which players you use, etc.

    It's all about DRM and their control.

  130. Waving hotcoals now are they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just dump a bucket of water on them and call it a night.

  131. S-curves by danila · · Score: 1

    CDs WILL die out, just like DVDs. To find out when and how just draw a time graph of music/video sales. You are likely to see a common pattern - a new technology emerges, slowly/quickly gains popularity, enjoys that popularity for a while and then fades back into obscurity. This always happens and will continue to happen, a truly universal pattern of the technological progress.

    Look at MP3 sales. Look at MP3-player sales. They are growing and it can mean only one thing - the old technology is dying.

    P.S. The fact that you only see what happens with CDs today and try to rationalise why that won't ever change simply means that your prognostication skills suck.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    1. Re:S-curves by Fallus+Shempus · · Score: 1

      DVDs exploded onto the market, MP3s haven't.

      CDs/DVDs will be replaced eventually, but currently, as can be seen here, there are enough people who want them to make it a huge market.

      It generates massive amounts of profit for the companys involved... end of story.

      I also like owning a physical thing, I don't like borrowing, or lending, I want to own; whether it's books, CDs or DVDs. Data on a hard disk, backed up or not, does not have the same feeling of permanence.
      My PC at home does not have anything particularly important on it, nothing I can't re-create pretty damned quickly, so I only back up little bits and pieces every now and again, I don't want to have to start backing up tons of crap I download at what is still an inflated price.

      Hell, I haven't bought singles for over 10 years why should I start to download then, surely that's being sucked in by what is basically a market drive to generate revenue (note, not a market drive to replace a failing revenue).

    2. Re:S-curves by danila · · Score: 1

      Everything you say makes sense... in the short-term. Yes, DVDs are not going anywhere in a year, even in two years. Heck, even in 5 years DVDs will surely be somewhat popular. However, the rate of technological change is so great that you are virtually guaranteed enormous changes on the scale of 10 years. In 1995 the MP3 music was only beginning to appear online. The DVD specifications were not released until Spetember 1996. These 10 years saw the explosion of digital communications, made the Internet almost ubiquitous and fundamentally changed the way humans find and consume information.

      The changes are not slowing down and there is no reason to believe they will anytime soon. In 1995 most hard disks could not hold 500 megabytes and keydrives were non-existant. Using Internet meant using a 14400 baud modem.

      It doesn't take a genius (or, rather, it shouldn't take one) to realise that by 2015 we will have bandwidth and storage capacity that seem enormous to us today. There can be no question that we will be able to quickly (immediately, for all practical purposes) transmit DVD-quality (and better) video almost anywhere and then store it on a device as small as it is practical to handle.

      To argue that despite all these expected developments people will retain the propensity to physical embodiments of films and music is silly. It is a factor that can be important to one customer deciding today whether to buy a DVD-player or a media center, but not to the whole market on the scale of a decade.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  132. The DVD age has only just begun! by Simonetta · · Score: 3, Informative

    The argument that Broadband downloading will greatly reduce the demand for DVDs is rather flawed. It assumes that Broadband will be widely adopted. It assumes that an extremely wide variety of movies will be available for download from somewhere. It assumes that entertainment consumers will prefer a pay-per-view format over a physical disk recording that costs the same or less.

    None of these arguments are reasonable. {note to grammar eagles, I'm assuming the word 'none' is an adjective of the noun 'arguments' so the verb 'are' must be plural. Please don't tell me 'none is' should be the correct form.}.

    -DVD players sell for $30-$50, which is less than a single month of broadband. DVDs sell for the same as a pizza.

    -Studios are in the process of converting every film in their archives into DVDs for sale or rental. Speciality video stores in every city will have titles that will never be available on-line. Broadband pay-per-view will always have the Star Wars flick from two years ago, but suppose you want to see Brian De Palma's The Fury or the original version of Swept Away (which is so much better than Madonna's version)?

    -A physical disk means something. It has value. You can play it over and over without damage. Stop it and play scenes again. Sell it, trade it, lend it. Broadband distribution of films will never have this characteristic.

    DVD's are challenged not by Broadband pay-per-view, but by the physical limitations of getting the physical disks of ten of thousands of movie titles distributed. Partly this will need a change in mindset. Filmmakers have to be willing to distribute their work on DVD. They have to be willing to accept that the vast majority of people who will see their work will see it on a video screen, not in a theater.

    For example, every year my fair city has a 'film festival'. Prints of a hundred or so films are brought from all over the world and shown once or twice in a local theater for $10 each admission. Then they disappear; most never to be seen again. Suppose for $10 you could buy a six-pack of DVDs of your selection from this list of 100 films. Rare and interesting films would get much wider distribution and acknowledgement.

    This is where the natural advantages of the DVD format will become apparent. The people who say that Broadband pay-per-view will wipe out DVD in the near future are just making wild statements to get their names exposed in the media.

    1. Re:The DVD age has only just begun! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the grammar eagles:

      'are' is the correct form. Don't be so defensive. ;-)

    2. Re:The DVD age has only just begun! by maird · · Score: 1

      Despite the growth in broadband capacity I am unconvinced that it will have the capacity to support HD video at DVD like quality for multiple homes in a single neighbourhood any time soon. Rotating HD capable media will arrive a long time before that and the players will play your existing DVD collection. Sounds like a hard habit to break. In places like the UK where the wiring infrastructure is ancient it's hard to see how broadband will ever develop sufficiently for complete replacement of physical media (despite the BBC and UK government's plans). Wireless may resolve that but not any time soon and not at all for many homes. This is true for many European, American and African countries and many cities in the USA, all of which can support some form of DVD market. For the studios this means supporting more than one distribution medium versus DVD/future DVD where one disk fits all (region code notwithstanding).

    3. Re:The DVD age has only just begun! by drxray · · Score: 1

      "Speciality video stores in every city will have titles that will never be available on-line."

      Well, if DVDs have been printed we can just rip them and P2P them legally when the copyright expires. Or any company that thinks it can make its distribution costs back can sell recordings to us. Sadly copyright law has been extended a lot way, and might well change to never expire by the time that happens for many classics.

      "They have to be willing to accept that the vast majority of people who will see their work will see it on a video screen, not in a theater."

      Computer screens are vastly superior displays to televisions. Even 1080i is unimpressive compared to what a cheap (relative to a HDTV set) monitor can do. They are a lot smaller, true, but I think film-makers would be a lot more artistically happy with computer-based rather than TV-based video, which is something video over the internet can provide.

      Finally, who says broadband distribution has to be pay-per-view?

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  133. What's not to like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [X] overpopulation
    [X] overpriced housing
    [X] liberal/gay nuts conversing with trees
    [X] bums chauffeuring cats about
    [X] stoplights with no intersection
    [X] shitty bandwidth

  134. WE JUST SAY THAT TO JUSTIFY THEFT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  135. Already has... by JackJudge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...for me anyway.

    I used to love DVD shopping but in the last two years my "habit" has come under severe control.
    Everytime I think about buying a DVD I ask myself what I'm paying for that I couldn't get online for free. Are the extras (if any) really worth £15.99 ? Nope. So I'll go and download myself a good DivX encoding and add it to the library.
    The only DVDs I do buy these days tend to be box sets and hard to get titles, even that's a rarity.

    I amassed over a hundred titles in my first two years of DVD ownership, I think I've bought maybe half a dozen in the two years just gone.

  136. Materialism by hu8 · · Score: 1

    Before they stop to give any physical objects they should bring people not to be materialist...

  137. Quality argument is crap by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Informative
    MPEG wich is the video codec for DVD's is a pretty old one. Modern hardware can do much more crunch work so can use a thighter compression method. DivX and others can easily be setup to not loose any image information. It would be like saying RLE encoded images are not as good quality as BMP let alone GIF. Different encodings. Exactly the same image IF you convert with lossless settings.

    Further more during the encoding you can enhance the image wich would be to costly to do during live playback but doesn't matter during a one time encode.

    Frankly a good encoder can really save a DVD suffering from blocks.

    As for the sound. Well someone else already pointed out that DivX is for video not for sound. Most of the container formats (avi/ogm/mkv) allow you to use any audio codec you want.

    Ease? Well lets see. Mplayer comes with linux easily and plays everything for free. DVD player costs money and requires me to open my PC. It is all relative.

    Frankly I don't like DVD's. Why oh way do the search functions suck so much. Not to say anything of the FBI warnings. Only way I can see the warnings is if I got a legal copy. Kinda like the police pulling people who are driving the legal limit over telling them not to speed while letting the speeders go free.

    DVD's you can keep them. Long live DivX/Xvid/Godknows(or cares) + audio codec in the container format of your choice. Just that the next person to mistake DivX for anything but a video codec will get one between the eyes.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  138. Anime is already somewhat like this by foxalopex · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually a good example of video that is heavily Internet distributed is actually Anime. It's widely shared in file distribution systems and most folks who are big anime fans are also big downloaders. So does that mean DVDs are doomed? Not really! Most big Anime fans actually still buy the ultra-expensive DVD sets of their favourite series. It often comes with a very nice looking box and the quality is much higher than mpeg4 clips you can download. Unless broadband speeds allow you to somehow download 8Gb of data (which is about the size of dual layer DVD) in a matter of minutes, I seriously doubt DVD as a format will be in trouble anytime soon. Another importent point is that we're able to detect visual compression easier than we can detect audiable compression. This is partly due to the fact that most of us downloading will be using our computers to watch video and computer monitors completely destroy TVs when it comes to image quality. I'll bet that mp3s wouldn't be as popular if by default we used high end sound systems on all our PCs. By default we have high end video systems on our PCs.

  139. Don't count em dead yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of having a physical disk which contains an entire movie. The storage isn't yet cheap enough to 'just keep it on disk', and DVD's have more ....permanence... being optical media than magnetic media. It's hard to get a head crash on a dvd player, or as a web site published "Power corrupts, Power failure corrupts absolutely!" (They were down due to a power failure with resultant database data loss). A DVD is a complete high resolution digital movie. If the MPAA is worried, then they are insane. There isn't a 'new technology to compress movies onto some new media' yet. It might be a while. HD-DVD isn't here yet, and compressing video is a bit more of a challenge than compressing audio. Mpeg is alredy compressed. You might get multiple DVD's onto an HD-DVD, but bandwidth isn't that great yet, and the cost benefit analysis of buying a DVD vs downloading and burning results in it being cheaper to buy the DVD and then (maybe) archive on a HD-DVD. The sneakernet might be an issue, but no more than people trading LP's.

  140. Digitization always degrades the quality by Simonetta · · Score: 1

    What was the successor to the CD format? MP3, a lower-quality format,...

    I suspect that this not only applies to audio, but to everything that gets digitized.

    The digital result is always poorer in quality than the original medium. But the advantages of digitization cause it be widely accepted, not as a replacement for the original medium, but as a powerful alternative.

    For example, when the musical instruments are digitized by synthesizers and samplers. The result is always a poorer quality musical instrument than the original. But you can change the instrument by just pressing a button. And you can fit hundreds of instrument samples on a single small chip. The inexpensive plastic keyboard that plugs into a sampler will never be as good or expressive as a real piano, but you don't have to transport a piano to very many performances to see the advantage of having a sampler the size of a video cassette that sounds almost as good.

    Purists can tell that CDs don't sound as good as vinyl records. But they're smaller, cheaper, and last longer. And sound much better in a $30 CD player than a vinyl record will sound on an old $30 turntable stereo. Again digitization reduced the quality of the medium, but it was accepted for its other advantages.

    Writers used to feel an 'intimate connection' with their typewriters that they often didn't feel with PC word processor programs. No one today would spend ten minutes with a typewriter and claim that it's better than a word processor program.

    The phenomenon is seen everywhere. Little handheld cell phone voice quality is nowhere near as good as 1960's Bell equipment. Watching a film on DVD is nowhere as good as seeing it in a movie theater. Inkjet prints of scanned photos are far inferior than the original photo. PDF files of chip datasheets pale when compared to a big thick Data Book on crisp, thin, bright white paper. Hacking through an airline website to plan a trip is a poor imitation of having a good and knowledgeable travel agent.

    Digitization turns everything into crap. BUT, the advantages of connecting the results of digitization in ways that were inconceivable with the old media makes the results of digitization widely and gladly accepted.

    1. Re:Digitization always degrades the quality by tricorn · · Score: 1

      You have an odd definition of "better" and "worse". Much of what you talk about is "different". Analog is "worse" than the original medium (the original medium being the singer's voice, the drum, the guitar, the flute), where "worse" means "less perfectly reproduced". Digital isn't inherently better or worse than analog at reproduction, it is just "different".

      How is it that you define a "physical" musical instrument as better than a synthesized one? Sure, a cheap synthesizer probably sounds worse than most instruments to most people, but if someone learned to listen to music on a good synthesizer, they'd think those old-fashioned wood and metal and string instruments are the "poor substitute for the real thing".

      I've seen touched-up scanned photos re-printed on a decent inkjet photo printer that were much better than the original "analog" photo it was scanned from.

      PDFs compared to chip Data Books, especially when you can search the PDF? PDF, hands down.

      A movie in the theater isn't better than a DVD because the DVD is digital, it's because the theater screen is huge. With enough bandwidth, a digital theater projection would be just as good (well, OK, we still have a ways to go in color saturation and range, but you'd have the same problem with analog - the problem isn't analog vs. digital, but electronic vs. film).

      And, while a good travel agent can sometimes find you a good deal or a better trip, you can often do a better job on your own. It's nice to have the choice, and it's good to do a little leg work before you go to the travel agent in the first place, as a check on what they're doing.

      So I disagree with your premise that "digitization turns everything into crap". What it does do is turn crap into crap at much faster rates and for cheaper than ever before, so we get lots more of it drowning out the good stuff.

  141. DVD and mpeg4 codec nicely works together. by incal · · Score: 4, Informative

    Two weeks ago I've bought a simple, but nice DVD/XVID player Wiwa HD228. This little thing plays nearly all DIVX/XVID encoded media, from many possible sources: CD, CDR, VCD, SVCD, DVD, DVD-R, DVD-RW..., on big TV screen, with 5+1 audio. Without clumsy connections with PC and its noise.

    Having a complete set of the Ghost in the shell episodes on one DVD is great. What is the point of using comercially available discs and/or media broadcasting services, when their content is usually not very different from DVD rental shops?

    If I wish to watch some Nick Zedd videos, or something with equally unusual content, I have no chance to find them outside p2p community. So, what these media CEOs could offer me? They're outdated already.

    1. Re:DVD and mpeg4 codec nicely works together. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a complete set of the Ghost in the shell episodes on one DVD is great. What is the point of using comercially available discs and/or media broadcasting services, when their content is usually not very different from DVD rental shops?

      A DTS track? Or maybe to support the companies that make the stuff?

      At least with Anime COs, there arnt (many) evil companies involved.

  142. Re:YES...goodbye FCC by lymph · · Score: 0, Troll

    This would be the greatest thing ever. The FCC would no longer have a job...WHOOOO! Then all the HAM radio guys can roll up their licenses and smoke 'em.

  143. It wont die. by NanotechLobster · · Score: 2, Informative

    I need something to burn my videos on after all.

  144. Downwho? by AliasMoze · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Half the people in the country will have a hard time moving from DVD to download. The DVD player still fits the old VCR model - stick something in the front of the box, and it plays. DVD is really just a more advanced VCR, as far as most people are concerned.

    Downloading, of course, is a foreign concept to most people. While my dad is computer literate, my mother has never touched a computer, and she wouldn't know what the f*** a download is. Literally, she has no concept of it.

    If downloading becomes the norm, it will happen through the cable box. Again, the cable box is a box hooked to the TV, a concept everybody understands.

    1. Re:Downwho? by Phreakiture · · Score: 1

      DVD is really just a more advanced VCR, as far as most people are concerned.

      This is true, but DVD desperately needs a feature that it usually currently lacks. On the remote, there needs to be a button, next to the Play button. Play has the |> icon on it, this one could have |>! on it, with the acronynm JPTFMA under it. JPTFMA expands to Just Play The F---ing Movie Already!

      Pressing this button would cause the DVD player to halt immediately whatever it is doing (except if it is still reading the TOC, of course), locate the main feature, and immediately start play from chapter 1. I don't need a menu, thanks, I already know what's for dinner, and some of these menus play pretty long before giving you a chance to choose.

      --
      www.wavefront-av.com
  145. Not yet! by TheLibero · · Score: 1
    will contribute to a more efficient delivery method of media content. Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?

    No, I don't think so. DVD replaced VHS sort of media. Broadband isn't really comparable with DVD. The penetration rate is marginelly different. There are still plenty of areas that aren't covered by broadband. The cost of owenership is higher, and hey, not all people are computer-friendly!

    --
    "Evil thrives when good men do nothing"
  146. It COULD work... by solios · · Score: 1

    And what am I going to watch when Speakeasy is experiencing a Network Service Event (aka downtime)? What the hell am I going to back up my video, music, and work files to? HDDs don't last forever. DVD's a great storage medium. It's okay for movies, but hey- I've been ripping my DVD video to DIVX. I've found it handy to keep the optical drive free.

    I'm not interested in 4398573489 commentaries, cast and crew bios (imdb is much more thorough...), FX production documentaries, Making Of documentaries, etc, etc. That shit all started to blend together well before LOTR shoved the "extras" thing straight into overkill. The few movies I really want to see extras on (Repo Man, Dark Star) are light on 'em.

    If Apple could do for selling movies what they've done for selling music, I'd be on that shit in a heartbeat- cheap entertainment I can back up and view whenever I get bored. No problem.

    DVD's great for extended bouts of offline, or if you're one of those consumers with the Ultra Mega Home Theater, but video viewing is tied fairly tightly to my computer useage, so hey- broadband video delivery is right up my alley.

    But I'll be burning it off to DVD-R for backup and offline storage, kthks. :P

  147. Not likely by pg110404 · · Score: 1

    Very few movies I watch I feel are worth buying. But if I do decide it's worth it, I want full commercial DVD quality and often times buy the movie.

    However the bits get onto the DVD (stamped at a factory and shrinkwrapped, or downloaded from somewhere and burned to disk), is irrelevent for what each person determines is worth keeping in their collection. It's probably very few people who do not buy a legitimate copy or make/obtain an illegal copy of a movie they truly enjoy. If you've gone through the effort of downloading off the net a movie you really like, you'll very likely burn it to DVD rather than delete it and have to download it again weeks or months later.

    The rest is either rented and returned, or downloaded and deleted and for each person is a matter of personal preference whether to keep or not.

    But in terms of broadband killing DVD, I think is like saying the car kills off the sale of shoes. Just because you don't need shoes to ride in a car, doesn't mean the sale of shoes will decline because of the availability of cars.

  148. sorta like Steam really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sucks having to connect to the internet to play Half Life 2 but it's really going to suck if I need a net connection to watch a movie.

    Also, maybe I'm a bit ignorant but since when were DVD players have internet access?

  149. I buy more CD's by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    How often do you buy CDs? Since mp3's got popular, I barely buy any physical CDs anymore.

    I now buy a lot more CD's than I ever used to. Until a few years ago I very rarely bought CD's or other music media, because I didn't want to spend that amount of money without really having any idea of what I'd be getting. There's not a lot you can tell from a CD cover, and it's usually difficult to sample something more than a few minutes in a CD store.

    Since MP3's have been available, I often download one or two of an album that looks promising and keep them around to listen to for a few weeks. If I still like what I hear after that time, I'll usually go out and buy the album with the knowledge that it's less likely I'm throwing away money on something I won't listen to in the long term. MP3's that I get sick of don't stay around for long.

    Looking down my playlist, I can see that I have bought the respective CD's for most of what's on there.

  150. Re:Physicality [winhat] by winhat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Because you are a dumb one too!

    The heart is the star at the end of the temple of heaven, from the throne, saying, "it is done" and there were voices, and thunders, and lightnings; and there was a great pleasure it is the skeleton enclosing the brain.

    The polka is a long time.

  151. DVDs-necessary for Internet movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over 60% of the bootleg movies from the Internet are DVD-rips. No DVDs, no quality bootleg movies on the Internet (what is left are some HDTV recordings plus low resolution, crappy stuff)

  152. There's no dichotomy here by zestyalbino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    CDs, DVDs and downloaded content all have their place. Sure, I download music all the time (and pay for it), and would do the same with film if it were available.

    However, when I find a gem - something I really love - I'll still fork over the cash for a physical copy of the item. It's worth owning a DVD or CD for the artwork and inserts that come with it, but even more so, it's something to collect and display. It's no different than books - I first read 1984 and Neuromancer online and subsequently purchased both.

    Perhaps nobody will buy bad movies on DVD anymore as they've seen it online and been unimpressed, but I'd say that's a good thing.

  153. Simple answer: No by TractorBarry · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter how many times it's tried I for one am not going to put up with a subscription only model (which is what this idea represents)

    If I buy something I want to receive a physical object in return for my cash. Furthermore if this physical object is a container for digitised media I want to be able to transcode the content (so I can play it on new devices) and to back it up how I see fit (as a computer user I know the value of backups)

    So no, broadband delivery is not going to attract my money - nor I suspect the vast majority of users.

    On this note I have never bought an MP3 and do not intend to due to them being DRM crippled. I have however, and will continue to, buy CDs that conform to Phillips Red/Orange etc. book specifications (And all my purchases in the recent past have been by non *AA artists)

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:Simple answer: No by AliasMoze · · Score: 1

      "And all my purchases in the recent past have been by non *AA artists..."

      Hey, sometimes the best artists happen to be alcoholics.

  154. Cliff Hanger!! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity? [Cue Organ Music]

    Tune in tomorrow for our next exciting dupeventure!

    Slashdupe is brought to you by Xerox, makers of fine copiers.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  155. What affordable broadband? by gtsili · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see any increasing availability, affordability, and speed of broadband in Greece where I come from. Right now we pay more than 50 Euros for a 386/128 ADSL connection per month. And last time I checked Greece was part of EU. Ok granted that Greece is not the most technologically advanced country in the world but I am sure that there are countries less advanced as far as technology goes than Greece (I maybe wrong ;)).

    Then again what do you expect from someone from Alcatel to preach. Anyone from TDK, Maxtor or Fuji on the same subject?

  156. Obscurity? by JohnG307 · · Score: 1

    Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?

    Yes, it will be as obscure as corded telephones and VHS and those little cassette tapes. Sure, we'll come up with something better to replace it, as we do with all things in time. But it was so popular in its day, so ubiquitous in its market, that obscurity is just the wrong word.

  157. Yikes by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Is it really that common to use P2P to backup your disks? :-)

    Seriously, that's my point -- I prefer a physical medium to backup data on. Broadband isn't the Solution for Everything to me.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  158. Re: Broadband to kill off DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh, no. That's like saying everyone in the world is going to be ordering cable internet / broadband / wireless / etc. Not everyone wants or even needs to be "connected" any more than everyone is going to want to stop using DVD.

  159. I buy about 100 CDs a month. by RMH101 · · Score: 3, Funny

    they come on a spindle...

  160. and now the "thing" isn't a CD by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ...it's an iPod

  161. It'll be a while by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    Will DVD join LaserDisc in obscurity?

    Eventually, but not any time soon. DRM creates severe longevity issues in a non-physical media. When someone buys a DVD he expects it to still work next year. You don't just need fast broadband, you need to solve the drm problem too.

    The near-term risk is to Blockbuster and their ilk. DRM doesn't matter so much if you're only watching it once anyway.

    Netflix will probably outlive Blockbuster since broadband is slow coming to the rural areas.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  162. Broadband replace DVD by hawkwynd · · Score: 1

    Or will something replace broadband before broadband replaces DVD..

  163. I think Steve Jobs is only half right by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    No one is going to go back to VHS quality just because they can download it faster over the Internet. It ain't going to happen. The download of DVD-quality movies takes hours over most people's broadband connections, and we're going to high-def in 2007, let's say. That's going to add bandwidth and get even slower as we go to high-def.

    Even if people don't want to go back to VHS quality, DVD quality might be the point where most say "good enough for me". Right now, I know someone who routinely lets his PC run overnight to get movies from p2p networks.
    With better codecs for smaller file size and faster broadband connections, this might become even more common.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  164. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a car by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

    I have a cable modem, and even with bitttorrent, it still can take a few days or more for a DVD-sized amount of, ah, linux isos to download.

    By contrast, I can drive down to the store and return to my house with a shitload of DVDs in less than an hour.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Never underestimate the bandwidth of a car by Froobly · · Score: 1

      I thought the quote was, "never underestimate the bandwidth of a truck loaded full of backup tapes." Same principle, though.

  165. jeez -- so angry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try not to be so hard on the guy, it's not like he said something about your mom :)

  166. Two Other Killers by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    Based on my recent experience I'd say 2 things will kill off DVD:

    1. Rental DVD's get mauled to the point where they aren't viewable very quickly. Both DVDs I rented last weekend had aggravating gaps in them (yes, I did the wash with mild soap & water, isopropyl alcohol rinse, lint-free cloth dry, tried a different DVD player).
    2. HD formats will make DVDs as unappealing as VHS tapes are right now. As soon as the HD-DVD format wars are over, that is.
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  167. Let's Hope So by NardofDoom · · Score: 1
    In order for "broadband" (which is legally defined as slow as 512kbps) to kill DVDs we'll have to upgrade our networks to support at least a sustained 4Mbps.

    Of course, that's in the US. In Korea only old people buy DVDs.

    --
    You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  168. DVD... not yet. TV.... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think what's interesting is he went straight into the demise of DVD. I think what's going to happen first will be the demise of regular satalite broadcast TV. Unlike DVD the quality of regular TV isn't expected to be as high *yet*.. With the emergence of faster and faster copper based broadband it won't be long till TV on demand won't need to come from local tivos etc but will be centralised on your broadband providers uberTiVo(TM). Watching highdef movies will come later when the bandwidth is avilable... then you can download them to your iVid or burn them to DVD or whatever. But it ain't gonna happen tomorrow is it.

  169. DVD vs. Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think broadband has a good chance, but DVD is something physical. And THAT [most] people will want.

  170. Won't happen by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    Downloading of movies, legal and otherwise, won't kill DVDs. If anything, the trend most likely to smash the status quo is amazon.co.uk's DVD rental by post.

    I suspect that a large number of people buy DVDs because that's the only way to get at the full choice (not just what's on the local Blockbuster's shelves). They only want to watch the film once or twice and afterward the expensive bought DVD is dead weight. Widespread and easy rental by post could easily collapse most of the DVD purchase market. It could also reduce downloading. Why wait three days for a torrent of a DVD-rip to complete, and tolerate the inferior viewing experience, when you could recieve a posted DVD in one day and watch it in comfort?

    1. Re:Won't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that a large number of people buy DVDs because that's the only way to get at the full choice

      So true. Now I wish Amazon rented outside the Islands...

  171. this is crap. by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

    I have been hearing this since the Enron (yea, remember Enron... ) Wanted to market broadband like eletrcity and they sold on that movies will be on demand. I also hear this from the news that Netflix main competitor is not walmart cheap dvd rental, or end of late fee at blockbuster, the main competitor of netflix is movies on deamnd. I think where are the movies? It takes a long time to download a movie (legally or otherwise) So what's quicker and faster. You get your DVD on your DVD player and watch. To add to add, If you rent a mini-van, let's say you and your pal take a road trip. You can add dvd on that rental (maybe you bought a car with it) and it is nice to watch movies or let your kids watch movies. There is not way (unless you are redneck and put directTV on your mobile trailer) that you can get movies. So DVD are not dead yet, and nor will be in a long time. You can arguee now that VHS tapes are dead, but DVD. Come on!

  172. Things to consider... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    It sounds nice in some aspects, I guess, but consider...

    I live 20 miles from a fairly large city (Pittsburgh, PA). We only got cable broadband about a year ago, I've had DSL for 5.5 years but I'm so far from the switch that my "1.5 meg" connection is pretty slow. Still better than dialup, mind you, but still not enough for real streaming video. Perhaps our area is just out of step with the national trend but if my area represents the typical model than decent broadband is only available to ~20% of the consumer base.

    Also consider that today's catch phrase in technical entertainment is portability. Everyone wants it; iPods, laptops, portable DVD players... Everyone wants small units that they can carry to provide 100% of their media entertainment. This trend is only going to continue. Once we can get a stable "on demand" style music service that is not tied to either cellular or landline sources I can see the future prospects for physical media being slim. As it stands now I can carry a few hundred DVDs and a few thousand albums worth of media content in my backpack with my laptop and a few DVD folders.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  173. Alcatel has the tech to do it already. by LanceMan · · Score: 1

    I used to work for a company that developed a settop box/atm over T1 solution. It was basically an on demand movie system providing video content at 1.5 Mbps. This was 1995-97. I'm sure that by now the engineers I worked with can cram DVD grade video over 768 Kbps, with HDTV in the 1.5 Mbps.

    Alcatel funded this project, and had a test system of about 30k subscribers in the DC area, and a few buildings in Singapore outfitted with it. Tested and working in 1997, just too expensive.

    They are just waiting for cheap bandwidth to roll it out.

  174. Yawn...Talk to me when broadband is ubiquitous by thenefariousone · · Score: 1

    Broadband as it exists today, is neither fast enough nor wide spread enough. And who will be paying for all the fibre to the home, or the infrastructure it will require? Not to mention the obvious: If CDs haven't gone away because of broadband, why would DVDs?

    --
    http://hughgordon.com/
  175. For all those who want to pay $79 or more a month. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DVDs are cheaper, and now the blue disks can hold more information, so DVDs can squeeze more shows in collector sets, - all your favorite 'Friends' shows on just a few disks..

    So, unless broadband drops it's price to $9.95 a month,
    don't expect them to replace DVDs any time soon...

  176. Lossless by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Also, a 128kbps download will just not please some people. Audiophiles want the maximum quality they can get, and if they want it digital, they will rip it themselves to their own specifications.

    Apple will give you the option of lossess recordings now. A lot bigger - probably half the size of a corresponding *.wav file, but it is available. And that'll allow one to effectively make a bit-correct copy of the CD.

    Note that, as another responder alluded to, it would be great to do *better* than CD at some point as "CD quality" is a misnomer to some.

    1. Re:Lossless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But can you purchase songs from the iTunes store in lossless AAC format?

    2. Re:Lossless by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Apple will give you the option of lossess recordings now. A lot bigger - probably half the size of a corresponding *.wav file, but it is available.

      Yes, Apple has graced the scene with another lossless codec. But do they sell any tracks at iTMS which use this codec? As far as I am aware the only online site that might provide this service is AllOfMP3.com. Of course if you purchase the CD you can use iTunes to produce a lossless copy on your hard drive.

    3. Re:Lossless by lidocaineus · · Score: 1

      And where do you propose the original files to encode to come from? A lossy file downloaded from iTunes? A lossy MP3 you downloaded off a P2P network? Or the non-lossy CD you purchased?

  177. Streaming movies by StormReaver · · Score: 1

    The biggest reason movies won't be streamed through broadband is the ever lowering bandwidth caps ISPs are enforcing.

    I have DirecWay satellite Internet, and I can't even download a single-CD Linux distribution without running afoul of my bandwidth cap. Even if a movie's quality were horribly degraded and the disk image highly compressed, I still couldn't watch the movie online without getting bitch-slapped by DirecWay for exceeded the cap.

    DSL and cable Internet providers are increasingly moving to the same restrictions, so having consumer broadband is getting less and less meaningful.

    DVD capacity will grow orders of magnitude faster than consumer Internet bandwidth, making them increasingly suitable for data backup more desirable as a movie transport medium (higher quality movies or more extra content).

    DVDs aren't going away in the foreseeable future. If anything, their usage will expand into other areas.

  178. So... by robathome · · Score: 1

    The head of a company who has a vested interest in widespread adoption of broadband technology says that "broadband access will replace DVDs." That's a shocker.

    More accurate statement: "We'll attempt to replace physical media with a bitstream that we control, can force you to pay for over and over again in order to maintain access, and can attach all sorts of licensing and DRM to. Oh, by the way, you'll need our special CinemaFiend Broadband service pack at $49.95 a month in addition to regular content subscription fees to make it work."

    On-demand video streams will become more available, and supplement the sale of physical media. They'll obsolete DVDs in the same way that radio obsoleted records.

    --

    At 3 A.M. you can see people's auras; at five you can see their contrails...
  179. Nuts! by redelm · · Score: 1

    Does this dude have any idea about the bandwidth of a tractor-trailer full of DVDs on an Interstate highway? Roughly 260 exabytes/s (10^15). [first heard as station wagon of tapes].

  180. Not in the first world even... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India, man? I live in Europe and I'm still far from getting anything resembling broadband.

    OTOH, I'd welcome some about-VHS-quality pay-per-view system that would allow me to see some shows I've been longing to watch for years now. In the end, it all boils down to content for me, and I just can't afford all those DVDs.

  181. "More efficient." I like that. by mwood · · Score: 1

    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of magtapes hurtling down the highway."

    New technology doesn't always entirely displace older technology. I would say that it does so only rarely. Rather, we get more choices, each with its own characteristics which makes it most suitable for a particular style of use.

    I'd rather pay $10 for a DVD that I can watch a hundred times than pay $1 each time to watch someone else's copy a hundred times. So for me, DVD beats broadband hands down. Others may disagree...well, they may. Celebrate diversity, okay?

  182. K5 Article by un1xl0ser · · Score: 1
    There is an article on kuro5hin.org that talks about how much you would pay to legally download an episode of a T.V. show.

    There are some interesting posts. Check it out here.

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  183. Never underestimate... by olddotter · · Score: 1

    About 7 years ago a co-worker held up a dat tape and said "Never under estimate the bandwidth of FedEx". That was after 3 days of failed attempts to ftp a tar file about the size of a DVD movie. With netflix you could say "never underestimate the bandwith of the postal service." The point is still the same.

  184. Nick Zed on DVD? by mojoNYC · · Score: 1
    there's a Nick Zed audience in p2p?

    i always thought it was just the people who rented his VHS tapes at Reel Life on Bedford avenue...

    that's the power of the internet for you--his is a truly a niche market (and an acquired taste;>

  185. In the words of Neo: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit

  186. Diet plan? by tepples · · Score: 2, Funny

    They want something they can take to work and leave it lying about on the shop floor without losing hundreds of pounds if their e-reader gets robbed.

    What does theft of an electronic book display device have to do with Weight Watchers and gastric bypass?

    1. Re:Diet plan? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're a comic genius. You see, pounds are both a unit of weight and a currency. Will you be here all week?

  187. You end up owning nothing by BlackHawk-666 · · Score: 1

    That's right, if you go for a subscription model you end up owning nothing when you unsubscribe. I'll take the plastic discs any day since I can enjoy them for the rest of my life - or even sell them on if I choose. Sure, they may be more expensive to acquire, but in the long run they will most likely be cheaper and I tend to watch the same movies quite a number of times. That's mainly because I only buy films that I think have repeat viewability - otherwise it's rental time.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
    1. Re:You end up owning nothing by rjshields · · Score: 1

      I would prefer the subscription service, since I rarely wish to watch a film more than once. Besides, I have enough objects in my posession - I don't need any more bits of plastic cluttering up my living space.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  188. Ubiquity? Not in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering that many people in America (especially in NE Ohio where I live--not the most technically astute part of the country) either (a) can't substantiate the cost of DSL or Cable Modem, (b) the phone company has not gotten off of its hind quarters to build out the access or (c) the cable company hasn't gotten around to offering the service --Time Warner was testing Roadrunner in Akron, OH (pop. ~225,000) in '96, Adelphia didn't roll out cable modem until 2002-2003 in Cleveland (pop. ~490,000), it's not surprising that this just wouldn't fly here in America.

    While, in the meantime, people can waltz over to nearly any store and grab a DVD, rip off the wrapper and pop it in. No phone company bs. No cable company bs. Just content.

  189. Rental replacing DVD sales for kids? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I don't buy DVDs either. Thats what DVD mail rental is for.

    I take it you don't have small children who like to watch Welcome to Weebleville or Little Nemo: Adventures in Slumberland or Cats Don't Dance repeatedly.

  190. Loudness race, not analog vs. digital by tepples · · Score: 1

    I still prefer a good analog LP over the CD crap sound

    What you're probably hearing is the loudness race. When recorded to specification, the peaks on LP have to be compressed more than the peaks on CD, but the loudness race has pushed CDs out of proportion. Compare CDs of the 1980s to CDs of today to hear what I'm talking about; the older recordings are mastered quieter, but they sound more lively because there is a greater peak to level ratio.

    Use a good ADC to turn your LPs into CD-Rs and tell me if they don't sound identical. Or are you a youngster who can still hear above 21 kHz?

  191. Silly prediction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What the hell is he talking about?

    1: My so-called "broadband" connection takes many, many hours to download a full-length movie. And yet, I have an above-average cable-modem speed for domestic US customers. Broadband speeds would have to increase by a huge factor before I could get real-time HD video. During the past 7 years, I have seen only a paltry increase in broadband speed.

    2: They still haven't figured out standards for HDTV connectivity, after years and years of dicking around. The Entertainment companies are making sure that battle drags out for as long as possible, to thwart the inevitable orgy of piracy that will occur as soon as it becomes truly straightforward for anyone to hook up a computer to a HDTV.

    The disc has a long, long life ahead of it.

  192. Lack of Technology... by cypherjf · · Score: 0

    Well I know where I live, in Pennsylvania, broadband isn't even an option. It's not even the fact I live out in the middle of nowhere, they (companies) just stopped the wire about 2 miles from our location. And I'm not going to pay 100$/month for the DirectPC, or whatever it is.

    So until the entire country has broadband access, I don't see this happening anytime soon.

  193. Freebox (was Re:Physicality) by joestar · · Score: 1

    FYI the Freebox with TV + phone is available in most French towns (I'm living in a 100 000 people town). And the offer is actually 20 Mbps, but the real bandwidth depends on the signal attenuation which results from the distance between the DSL adaptator and the telecom central (I've got 10Mbps, far from 2,5 km from the telecom central).

    But Free.fr now also offers 10 Mbps down, 320 kbps up (since one month) in roughly whole French territory, for the same cost.

    More information is available on:
    http://adsl.free.fr

    And you can train your French there.

  194. Not likely, they have different uses by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Only someone who wanted to have 100% control over your access would say something like that. You can't lend someone a broadband feed, you can't watch it again any time you want (you are at the mercy of availability), and they can edit the content, etc.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  195. Grammar, yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he's wrong about one thing. 'None' is a noun, not an adjective, and it can be used both singularly and plurally, as he says, depending on the quantity it's expressing.

    1. Re:Grammar, yay by LionMage · · Score: 1
      But he's wrong about one thing. 'None' is a noun, not an adjective, and it can be used both singularly and plurally, as he says, depending on the quantity it's expressing.

      Actually, a cursory examination of the Dictionary.com reference for 'none' indicates that 'none' can act as a pronoun, an adverb, or even an adjective (in the sense of "not any," see the entry sourced from WordNet/Princeton), but not as a noun. So you're wrong on two counts -- 'none' isn't a noun, but it can serve as an adjective.

      Note that I wouldn't have bothered, except that you were correcting someone with patently false information. It pays to check facts before being a pedant.
  196. The End...Not! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
    the days of the rapidly adopted medium are nearing their end.

    Only for movies I don't want to view more than once. At 4GB a wack, I'm not going to fill up a fragile hard drive with things I want to preserve for many future viewings yet.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  197. This is all well and good, but... by pbrammer · · Score: 1

    ...what happens when my connection to my ISP goes down? Then what? I still wouldn't say that broadband is "reliable."

  198. Wishful thinking by taustin · · Score: 1

    TV by broadband isn't even the same market as DVDs. Broadband could conceivably replace cable, as that's the same market. You watch something once, then move on. Given the abusive restrictions on making recordings and copies of downloaded content, you can only think of it as one-time television.

    DVDs are a completely different market, for people who want to own a copy of a favorite movie or TV show, that they can watch any time they want, over and over. And that their ability to watch doesn't depend on a web site staying in business (and everything else working just right, too, on their internet connection).

    Methinks somebody is peddling snake oil.

  199. MTV by Me-The-Person · · Score: 1

    Does MTV still play videos?

  200. Why I Don't Buy CD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think I'm like a lot of (older) music lovers - I stopped buying so many CDs partly because of my buddy Napster (RIP). Mainly it's because most of what I wanted to buy -what I wanted to spend $18 for 50 minutes of sound - I have already acquired. They aren't making any new classic rock. The CD boom of the 90's was an artifact of a billion consumers rebuilding their collections in a superior medium.

    When I compare the value of CDs and DVDs - one hour of noise, vs. 2+ hours of wallpaper and noise - there's no comparison. DVDs are superior.

    Will anything replace either? I use the transition from vinyl to cassette or CD, the transition from VHS to DVD as indicators. A technology has to be at least 3 to 4 times better or more convenient to be a replacement. Cassettes merely coexisted with records, since they couldn't compete for quality at first, and were tied for convenience (you can skip tracks easier on vinyl, but for travel cassettes won). However, the first time I let a friend listen to a CD on a moderately good stereo - it was a classical recording, and you could hear the piano pedal squeak - he ran out and bought one too. Who remembers hearing the sound of the needle rumbling through a groove?Dust noise?

    Ditto for DVD. When I watched movies on tape, the concept of letterbox escaped me. Why???? Having seen DVDs on big-screen TV, letterbox is perfectly fine.

    DVDs can go anywhere, play anywhere. They already compete effectively against a broadband downloading medium called "Television broadcasting" (plus VCR). One of the big surprises of the last year is how well box sets of old (old!) TV series sell. Who'da thunk "Green Acres Season 1" or "Jetsons" would be a passable seller after 40 years of reruns? People prefer the tangible, even if it's "Gilligan's Island".

    But then we reach the "law of diminishing returns" limit. How much better than CD can sound get? Newer formats are still "boutique" formats that only a few fanatics use. MP3s are just as popular at 128K despite fantics' insistance that it is "not good". DVDs are plenty good for anyone who doesn't have high-level home theatre equipment. Will the average consumer pay double, or even a dollar more, to get "better than DVD" 1080p signal? (Hah! Betcha they try to market "720i" as "High Definition"!)

    As for "feed" rather than "disk" - unless the feed will allow download to portable medium - burn a CD, write a SD card - who will prefer that? It better be cheap and easy. Movies are pushing the $10/DVD (unlimited play), and a 2-week rental less than $5 (unlimited play); a download better be able to play forever, carry around, take to a friend's place, etc. - or else it WON'T COMPETE.

    Anyone had to use the idiot tube as a babysitter? Kids will DEMAND to watch the same video 100 times... What'll that cost on broadband?

    How much can Hollywood expect to charge for the service? Assume the most fanatical consumers spend $100/month at Blockbuster. What's that going to buy you in downloads? Pay-per-view is not competitive price- or convenience-wise with DVD rentals, do you expect broadband to be better?

  201. Since When? by joeybear801 · · Score: 1

    Since when does the rest of the world listen to Paris based forums?

    --
    something should be here besides this dumb message
  202. People want to own their content, not rent it. by Grand+V'izer · · Score: 1

    I don't see bandwidth as the main problem here. Sure, lots of people don't have enough internet bandwidth now for this kind of service, but that will likely change over the next 20 years or so.

    What won't change is peoples' preference for owning their favorite content, rather than renting it. If the on-line music battles have taught us anything it is that renting content is fine some of the time, but people don't want to have their collection suddenly stripped from them just because they stopped paying for their subscription service. For most people their selection of art is a personal statement and they aren't comfortable with the thought that it doesn't belong to them. That's one of the great aspects of iTunes and similar services: you pay for your music, you keep it, and you can even burn your own copy onto a CD. Within some fairly acceptable restrictions, you can do what you like with it.

    The DVD itself is just a storage mechanism, like the cassettes and 8-tracks and vinyl platters before it. When it is replaced it will be by something that offers cheaper, more convenient storage of more data. It will NOT be replaced by what is essentially a rental service, delivered by broadband internet.

    --
    Not all random numbers are created equally.
  203. Own vs Rent by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 1

    Broadband may weaken the DVD rental market, but will not kill off the market for people wanting to "own" a movie or TV series in their own personal collection. I see broadband competing with the on-demand cable channels for movies that people would like to see. It'll have no effect on those who want to keep the movies they want to watch over and over again. I think it's the same argument that killed DiVX (the Circuit City rental program). I know I want to have the movies I really care about available to me whenever I want them, and I don't want ot have to ask for permission to watch them. No-one is predicting that on-demand cable will supplant DVDs, so why should broadband do the same?

    Predictions like this tend to the absurd notions that technologies somehow have to dominate and destroy other technologies that are similar, when the reality of the marketplace allows for technologies with similar goals to coexist nicely.

  204. Permanancy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    DVD's are permanent ( well for the most part, I realize they will degrade in time ) but a 'service' is not. You end up continually paying to watch your stuff.

    Your DVR's HD crashes.. You may be screwed, especially if you recorded/bought/leased some obscure item

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  205. And while you're predicting the future ... by beer_maker · · Score: 1
    What about my flying car? I was promised flying cars!

    (Love that Avery Brooks - Best. Commercial. Ever.)

    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  206. Physicality-Quality Piracy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The problem is that there just isn't much good music left; almost all music produced lately is crap."

    Guess that means all those P2P networks are saturated with quality music then.

  207. Much of this arguing misses the point by gunnerrat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some here have stated the media doesn't matter, it's the data, while others are firmly attached to physical media. Whichever is important to you, the real underlying issue is control of your data. You want to control what you see, the circumstances under which you see it, and when you see it. You also want to control the price.

    What the big media companies, up to this point, have always controlled is the formats. It started with phonographs, along the way we had reel-to-reel, cassettes, 8-track, and finally CD. For video we had VHS, Beta, laser disc, video disc (remember those?) and now DVD.

    What's changed is that the final (as of now) formats are all digital, and have converged with PCs so that now, finally, YOU have much more control of not only where & when, but also the format itself. A computer with the correct inputs/outputs give us control over the media - we could even stick digital video/audio back on VHS or cassette if we choose. The media companies fight that with the DMCA & the labels of piracy in an effort to retain that control. Why? Because every format change (in the past) allowed them to automatically generate new revenue not based on new products and content, but the re-selling of old. It's cheaper to recycle old ideas than to come up with new. Even better (for them), they soon will not only charge for a new format, but literally charge you every time you watch something. Despite being called dinosaurs, they see ahead and this is what they want.

    And then you have guys like this Alcatel guy saying "No, DVDs aren't the new media, it's the internet!" This guy really isn't saying anything new because many of us are already familiar (thanks largely to Napster) with moving audio/video over the internet. Our computers are small internet hubs whereby music/video files are moved to other devices as it pleases us.

    Really, the cat's out of the bag with digital content. The question is control: The media companies want you to have less so they can charge you more (on a per-view basis instead of a one-time charge), while people like us want more control because we have the capability for the first time to use it as we really want to.

    All this Alcatel guy is doing is trying to insert himself into the food chain by getting a piece of the media conglomerate action.

  208. Mighty Cargo Pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Band name!

  209. Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You haven't bought a book lately have you? Last time I spilled water on a book numerous pages were rendered unreadable and the glass was almost empty.

    What kind of shitty books are you reading?

    I've spilled (full) glasses of water on several of my books. (Actually, the cat was responsible for most of them.) At worst, the pages get stiff and wrinkled and the cover gets a little loose. I've never had a book become "unreadable" because of a glass of water.

    I live in the Pacific northwest. People around here walk around reading books in the rain (with no umbrella). It's just water, dude.

  210. It depends on the business model by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 1

    Let me pull out my crystal ball...

    It is 10 years in the future and the density of storage media has kept up with its own version of Moore's law. I have a device the size of an iPod that can hold over a terabyte of data. What can I do with this? I could hold hundreds of movies in HDTV format.

    Another nice thing is my iMoviePod can be carried anywhere - which means my kids can watch any movie in the car that they want, and when I go on business trips I can bring my movie collection with me.

    All this is due to the Hollywood Movie Company, Inc. which bought the rights to every movie they could get their hands on - and created a new format that would play on their new super-HDTV plasma-projecting Super Sound(TM) video systems. Sales weren't keeping the company afloat until Bob in Marketing had the idea that you could sell TVs and other hardware devices at a huge profit if you could include massive amounts of free entertainment. Everyone agreed (since the company was going bankrupt anyway) and boom sales took off.

    While the company had to spend a lot to get the rights to the older movies, it was well worth it - the people with the most spare money were older and LIKED the older movies and were disappointed they couldn't get them at the Holly-Buster Video store down the block.

    Seriously though - as storage gets more dense new formats are going to show up. If an optical disk ends up being able to hold over a terabyte of data, what are you going to use it all for? A movie with extras in any format will take up maybe 10-20% of the storage, so what is the rest for? We'll see smaller disks or more movies per disk. Maybe not new movies, but you could get all of the Tremors movies on a single disk. (Did anyone else know there was a Tremors 4?!?)

    I don't see downloading of movies being a reality until there is REALLY scary bandwidth on the planet. Think how many copies of The Matrix were bought on the day that it released - or any Harry Potter movie. Even with intelligent forwarding and caching it would overload whatever network is in place. Oh, and would you want to wait an hour or two while you and everyone else in your neighborhood download the same movie? No - I want to wait in line at watever store and get my copy at midnight so I can watch it before anyone else. This attitude might be rare, but it exists.

    So, I for one welcome our (perhaps old) optical storage overlords.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  211. Missing the point by flinkflonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think (or rather I like to think) that the "winning format" will be decided by something else entirely, namely how it will be controlled. I'm not one of those who stopped buying CDs just because I now have a truckload of MP3s and an ipod (hehe, just kidding), I just buy different CDs, and I check that they are real CDs before I buy them (Liam Lynch comes to mind. Nice music, chose to release them on an un-CD which is unplayable on everything I play my CDs on, so I didn't buy it).

    So, as long as DVDs are "protected" by easily avoidable encryption they have any right-to-live they want. If the encryption gets tightened so people have to buy DVD players from the same company that releases those DVDs, they are doomed. Likewise broadband video, as long as they come as more or less clean MPEG streams it'll have a chance. Add DRM, or even just the need for a certain OS (no, not only Microsoft makes these mistakes), it'll die before even reaching momentum.

    By the way. having just had to use some real videoconferencing equipment (which is very nice and dandy) over a lossy network (read ISDN through a noname-piece-of-crap-PABX) I can tell you the days of uninterrupted media streaming are not here yet by far. Now don't tell me your ADSL (or whatever) service is any better, because it isn't. So ask me again in five years or so :)

    Oh, and can't forget piracy. Piracy is a) not an argument, since piracy will exist anyway, and b) not only unavoidable but in certain cases even wanted by the corporations who make the products being pirated. You hopefully don't really believe Microsoft got where they are today by way of making superior products :)

  212. Physicality rocks! by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of DVD*R(W) media....

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.