Slashdot Mirror


KDE 3.4 Released

andy753421 links to today's announcement of the official release of KDE 3.4, and writes "Several KDE 3.4 based distributions such as ArkLinux and Kubuntu are soon to follow. Features in the release include built in Text to Speech, a revamped trash system, enhanced PDF support and PC to PC synchronization, as well as a new theme. KDE 3.4 weights in at 6,500+ bug fixes, 1,700+ enhancements, and a grand total of 80,000+ contributions." Reader gotr00t adds a link to the KDE download mirror page . Update: 03/16 20:58 GMT by T : mrevell points out an interview with KDE hacker Aaron Seigo in the latest LugRadio, in which Seigo "dispels various myths about KDE and talks about the desktop environment's future."

454 comments

  1. One more stat by suso · · Score: 5, Funny

    KDE 3.4 weights in at 6,500+ bug fixes, 1,700+ enhancements, and a grand total of 80,000+ contributions.

    Plus the 1000+ posts that are going to come in this slashdot article from kde vs. gnome folks.

    1. Re:One more stat by dmf415 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Nooooooooooo,
      that many bug fixes? KDE Can't have more bugs then winblows!

    2. Re:One more stat by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    3. Re:One more stat by Ritalin16 · · Score: 1

      KDE is way better, except icons get so disorganized, and align to grid makes them look bad :O

      --
      In soviet Russia, Linux compiles YOU!
    4. Re:One more stat by x2A · · Score: 1

      Correct, windows has an extra digit or two in the bug count :-)

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    5. Re:One more stat by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Remember, that's not saying that KDE has more bugs than Ms Windows, just more bugfixes. A whole world of difference there.

      Is there a reliable count of the number of bugs found in Windows so far?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Plus the 1000+ posts that are going to come in this slashdot article from kde vs. gnome folks.

      I believe that's included in the "80,000+ contributions".

      What they also don't tell you is that 5,950 of the 6,500 bug fixes were for the 1,700 enhancements.
    7. Re:One more stat by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
      ... Ms Windows ...

      Hell, it looks like Microsoft can't even make a keyboard that will register that the shift key is being held for more than one keystroke...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    8. Re:One more stat by netdur · · Score: 0, Interesting

      > kde vs. gnome
      it's simple, it's choice, everyone can pick up whatever he/she like... if you trying (trolling / flamware) force people use "DE" you like, you are nothing better than "ben laden"... it's really never mind, as long as "they" listen to freedesktop.org

      one thing to say to kde people, QT is GPL, fork it, the company is out there to profit not to help kde project, when you fork QT you will control the widgets then drive it to direction right that kde needs, as free project you shouldn't risk stay under mercy of trolish or whatever you call it.

      think about day trolish may think playing friendly with kde is not good for it business!!!

      --
      "Steve Jobs invented the world" -- Bill W. GATES
    9. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back again? Haven't you had enough abuse already for one day? You really are the risk taker of our time. I'm still not impressed.

    10. Re:One more stat by x2A · · Score: 1

      Yeah, -1... hmm wait think it's overflowed, should have used unsigned int...

      -2A

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    11. Re:One more stat by Rei · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't you mean "80,000+ Kontributions"? :)

      --
      "Here's a fun fact: the moon has turned to blood!" -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    12. Re:One more stat by PhilRod · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How about:
      • Refactoring code
      • Fixing bugs that hadn't been reported
      • Adding features that hadn't been specifically requested in the bugzilla
      • Writing and improving docs
      • New translations
      • Usability improvements
      • New artwork
      • ...
      Remember, software isn't just code, and a lot more goes into it than just bugfixes and now functionality.
      --
      KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
    13. Re:One more stat by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      Bugs in windows??
      No remember they are undocumented features.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    14. Re:One more stat by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      It's call overhead :)

      Also 2000+ optimizations.

    15. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS MS MS MS.
      Nope sorry Worked for me. I would say it is an issue of human interface

    16. Re:One more stat by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1
      MS MS MS MS. Nope sorry Worked for me. I would say it is an issue of human interface

      Actually, it is an issue with this specific keyboard - this is not the first and most likely not the last time the shift key has failed over more than one keystroke, or that it simply failed to register a keystroke at all. Issue doesn't occur on the other computers I use regularly. Of course, in addition to this being the only Microsoft keyboard I use, this is also the only wireless keyboard I use. In all fairness, it's probably more a reslt of the latter than te former, but then again, I didn't originally plan on using a paragraph to explain a typo, so there you go.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    17. Re:One more stat by l0perb0y · · Score: 2, Informative

      Still putting icons on the desktop? That's one of my favorite things about most Linux desktop launchers is I can categorize stuff into seperate launch menus a-la CDE. I never have to put anything on the desktop except maybe some desklets or something.

    18. Re:One more stat by Red+Alastor · · Score: 2, Informative

      I usually just alt-F2 and write the app name, way quicker :)

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    19. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the *ability* to put icons on the desktop. I don't store everything there, but it's a handy temporary area to use when doing gui manipulations on small sets of files.

      I'm really glad you're an organization freak. I just want a place to drop a file so I don't have to keep my bloody mouse button held down while I search for whatever to drag it into. The rest of us like desktops.

    20. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of like how you forked the english language right there? And what if "he/she" doesn't like how freedesktop.org does things? Wouldn't KDE and gnome "listening" to them limit "he/she"'s "simple choice"?

    21. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't you mean "80,000+ Kontributions"? :)

      Karefully komprehending the kontext of the kurrent konversation and kautiously konsidering the konverse, it kan be klaimed this is kompletely kanonikally korrekt.


      /looking forward to the next version of CDE

    22. Re:One more stat by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      What about dropping stuff to /tmp ? You don't even have to clean up after.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    23. Re:One more stat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean your desktop isn't a subdirectory of /tmp?

    24. Re:One more stat by Feztaa · · Score: 1, Troll

      I can save everybody the trouble right now.

      KDE is crap, GNOME is awesome!

      j/k ;)

    25. Re:One more stat by ken+kenobi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and to voice the counter argument. GNOME is crap, KDE is awesome! I think we've covered all possible aspects of the debate and we can now all go home.

    26. Re:One more stat by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      sure glad I took the troll mod on that one, what with the "j/k" and the smiley. Stupid mods.

  2. Yes, but... by Infinityis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it support a 1-button mouse?

    1. Re:Yes, but... by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      You must have missed the news this morning...lol.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Yes, but... by kaustik · · Score: 1

      Funny, you must have missed the parent's joke this afternoon.

    3. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately it is Insecure and Unscalable.

    4. Re:Yes, but... by ftvcs · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention this, I just installed KDE on my PPC 8600 and it took me about 10 minutes to figure out how to remove a floppy. There's no eject button on the floppy drive and with only one mouse button it's quite hard to 'click right' and choose 'eject'.

      Is mac for dumbasses with too much money?

  3. Obligatory comment by jsrlepage · · Score: 2, Funny

    and i JUST finished recompiling it.

    crap.

    --
    This is my opinion. Everyone has a right to my opinion.
    1. Re:Obligatory comment by Nasa+Rosebuds · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you meant to say I just finished recompiling 3.3.2

    2. Re:Obligatory comment by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

      Yesterday I set up konstruct to compile 3.4RC1 with GCC 3.3, 3.4, and 4.0 (I wanted to do some size and speed comparisons). It finished this morning, but I noticed the downloads were a little slow at the end. After refreshing the Konstruct web page I saw why...

      Ah well, konstruct is easy enough that I don't mind kicking it off again for 3.4.0.

    3. Re:Obligatory comment by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean emerging it? ;-)

    4. Re:Obligatory comment by Seriman · · Score: 1

      I emerged kde 3.3 on a naked gentoo box in about 6 hours. I don't think that's too bad for compiling kde and company on a system that barely has more than the base system on it.
      That said, the first time I emerged kde on gentoo was a year or so ago and it took two days with X already installed.
      These days I'm running an AMD643k with 1gb ram, that probably helps also.

    5. Re:Obligatory comment by CyberDave · · Score: 1

      So, when will KDE 3.4 make it into the x86-stable tree?

    6. Re:Obligatory comment by msh104 · · Score: 1

      you DID apply the bug fix right?
      otherwise your gonne have to do it again :P

      http://download.kde.org/stable/3.4/src/kdepim-fi x- imap-resource-type.diff

      A severe bug was found in the groupware support of kontact/kmail, which was too late for the KDE 3.4 release. Get kdepim-fix-imap-resource-type.diff (md5 sum: 1ec4778f0dbac85bc27bc2c2541e5c64) applied to the sources before you're using the groupware wizard.

    7. Re:Obligatory comment by bkubi · · Score: 1

      Of course you mean that as a joke. But there is a release-plan, a bit hidden, but there is. And if you are thinking about recompiling, maybe its worth checking it first. Thought, would be cool if emerge told me that it would be better to wait compiling, in case a new version is on schedule.

    8. Re:Obligatory comment by halivar · · Score: 1

      and i JUST finished recompiling it.

      Lucky you. I've been compiling KDE 3.0 since it came out.

    9. Re:Obligatory comment by jsrlepage · · Score: 1

      as a matter of fact i DO! :-D

      --
      This is my opinion. Everyone has a right to my opinion.
    10. Re:Obligatory comment by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't blame KDE for you trying to compile it on a ZX-80....

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  4. Don't forget Mepis... by DavonZ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Let's not forget Mepis. Another KDE based distro as well and getting much press as of late.

    http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=me pi s

    1. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A local ISP (local to both myself and MEPIS) has a MEPIS CD nailed to the wall labelled 'Worst. Distro. Ever.'

    2. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Why?

    3. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by clayasaurus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed, Mepis is a great distro. It doesn't have the resources of Ubuntu so you don't see as much ranting and raving for it, but it has got the following things going for it * live CD that works as a repair CD * lots of great programs * great installer, only 1 CD. * apt-get * nice default look * auto-detect hardware on every bootup

    4. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by clayasaurus · · Score: 1

      Because in its current state Mepis is superior to Kubuntu

      #1) Kubuntu is just Ubuntu with KDE, they just slapped KDE on it and say "look at us! we now have KDE too!" Even though I prefer KDE, if I were to use Ubuntu I would choose the Gnome interface because that is what it was designed for

      #2) Mepis autodetects all hardware at startup, liveCD has repair utils, a bunch of great programs out of the box (gaim, openoffice, k3b, kate, kweather, tuxracer, firefox, etc).
      You can have gaim stay in the tray, so when you click the X it doesnt' close out.
      It is only one CD, and it is debian based.
      It has a nice graphical installer and comes with partitioning tools as well as easy way to select the partitions to install to.

      It is easier to use, comes with more/better programs out of the box, is better configured, autodetects hardware, is updated more than ubuntu, even though ubuntu has the release schedule, and is just all around really nice. The sum of the parts greater than the whole.

    5. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm lets see: Its an easy to install debian, with a repair cd built into its live cd?

      This means that you can install pretty much any program on earth (Testing actually gets updated ALOT), without messing around with compiling each program (takes tons of time).

    6. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Oh, I like Mepis myself. A lot. But the original poster said "Worst.Distro.Ever." Thought I'd get an opinion from him.

    7. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > if I were to use Ubuntu I would choose the Gnome interface because that is what it was designed for

      Oh ballocks, what, did they stick gnome dependencies into apache while I wasn't looking? All of ubuntu's gnome dependencies come from the ubuntu-desktop package. To get kubuntu, you install the kubuntu-desktop package. Same organization scheme, and nothing about gnome is "hardwired in".

      I chose ubuntu because it was one of the best amd64 distributions out there, and it treats amd64 as a first-tier architecture unlike vanilla debian. I don't even see amd64 images for Mepis.

    8. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't ask why. I just saw the MEPIS CD nailed to their wall like that.

    9. Re:Don't forget Mepis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mepis 3.3 is crippled! So much that Mepis users are complaining about it at the forums.

  5. Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Kongratulations!
    2) All your GUI are belong to KDE!
    3) I, for one, welcome our new K-based overlords!
    4) In Soviet Russia, KDE releases YOU!

    That ought to cover the major ones. Carry on with the inevitable GNOME/KDE/XFCE/X flamefest now.

    1. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Electronik · · Score: 5, Funny

      You insensitive klod!!!!!

      --
      -=test-sig_0.1.5(NoWhitespaceVersion)=-
    2. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Imagine a Beowulf Kluster of those!

    3. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:

      5) The K stands for Krappy.

      Good list though.

      P

    4. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Klivian · · Score: 1

      You forgot one: In Korea only old people uses Gnome.

    5. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (5) Imagine a Beowulf kluster of these!

    6. Re:Obligatory cliches... by revtom · · Score: 1

      - KowboyNeal is my KDE
      - KDE will be outsourced to India.

      --
      -- We live in a kakistocracy.
    7. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2, Funny

      KowboyNeal?

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    8. Re:Obligatory cliches... by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux? ... ummm .... errr

    9. Re:Obligatory cliches... by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      And

      Does it run LINUX??
      umm nevermind....

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    10. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) KKK er... ???
      6) Profkit!

    11. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4) In Soviet Russia, KDE releases YOU!
      Other KDE i18-lization news inklude:

      5) Kde was inkorporated to the Czech anthem, which now starts with a verse
      KDE domov muj
      It's poethical expression of the love for KDE and means: KDE is my home

      6) In K-orea, only old people (born or rather subborn in old Corea) use GNOME

    12. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just kill me now.

      OK, I'll shut up.

    13. Re:Obligatory cliches... by istewart · · Score: 1

      Step 1) Release KDE 3.4

      Step 2) ???

      Step 3) Profit!

      (Also, I am obligated to add Step 2.5: Fire Rick Berman out of a cannon and sell tickets!)

    14. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite, and I'm sure it's one of yours...

      KDE 3.4 Released ...in Japan

    15. Re:Obligatory cliches... by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that whole thread and you forgot:

      Netcraft confirms KDE 3.4 released!

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    16. Re:Obligatory cliches... by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      That'd be KProfit.

    17. Re:Obligatory cliches... by youknowmewell · · Score: 1

      In North Korea, only old people use KDE!

    18. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm. I take it you meant Knort Korea...

    19. Re:Obligatory cliches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5) Only old Korean people use KDE

    20. Re:Obligatory cliches... by tmika · · Score: 1

      That ought to cover the major ones. Carry on with the inevitable GNOME/KDE/XFCE/X flamefest now.

      I don't agree, but I understand the GNOME vs. KDE thing, but...

      ...there's still an X vs. KDE contingent?!?!?

      Outside of people who can't upgrade their circa 1995 CPU, people who are emotionally invested in Lynx, and Microsoft marketing directors?

      WOW...

  6. Screenshots by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Interesting
    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Screenshots by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      My god, the fonts are so UGLY! I haven't seen such ugly fonts on a Linux desktop since 2002 or something, what did they do?

      The letter "w" is bolder than other letters, the letter "A" looks wierd, and the bold text is just messed up, missing the holes in the letters "e" and "a" among other things...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    2. Re:Screenshots by radish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think this release is going to have trouble gaining much usage in the UK - the entire country has been left off the globe on the new wallpaper!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jee, how do they do that, they still havn't changed that UGLY clock-font! Whaaaa!!!

    4. Re:Screenshots by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am so glad they've copied the Luna theme from Windows XP. This is highly popular amongst Windows XP users, I've never seen anyone turn it off and switch to classic mode yelling "Damn this ugly blue #$%@! What was Microsoft thinking?"

      No, not ever. Definitely not. Not geeks and ordinary users alike. Oh no. Never happens. It isn't the case that almost everyone in the office with XP - from the programmers to our product support people, etc - has switched to the classic theme and switches to it the moment XP finishes installing.

      Truly, they've copied a winner!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Screenshots by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Well, the old one was missing _all_ of Europe. I consider this one an improvement.

    6. Re:Screenshots by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      What are you looking at? The fonts look fine in the screenshots.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    7. Re:Screenshots by PhilRod · · Score: 4, Informative

      Heh, yeah. But surely the complete translation of the GUI into British English, along with sizeable portions of the GUI translated into Welsh and Irish Gaelic, there's plenty of opportunity for usage this side of the pond.

      --
      KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
    8. Re:Screenshots by trans_err · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's another from kubuntu with KDE 3.4 and default transparency options
      Pretty, eh?

    9. Re:Screenshots by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      Are you looking at the same screenshots as everyone else?
      I find the theme to be nice and very understated, unlike Karamba wich was an eyesore. I don't see any similarities with Luna, with its multicolored fat buttons.
      Oh, well. Whoever modded you insightful probably didn't look at the screenshots either.

    10. Re:Screenshots by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      Most of them. This one for example...

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    11. Re:Screenshots by jdfox · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's going to gain lots of fans in Belgium though: the country's suddenly quadrupled in size. Thanks, KDE!

      :)

    12. Re:Screenshots by theantix · · Score: 1

      Even more appalling, most of the KDE distributors don't change the KDE clock font from the default either. I think some people out there must actually think that it looks good. I find it quite hard to believe that any people actually think those screenshots are impressively good, or that every single application must contain a letter "K", but it's just a matter of taste I suppose. Thank gawd there is choice though...

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    13. Re:Screenshots by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's just KDE's commitment to being ahead of everyone else. KDE's developers have been running some complex global warming simulators, and it turns out that in 2007, sea levels are going to rise drastically. This, and that giant Earthquake in 2008, will cause Britain to disappear from the map.

      You'll notice Florida's been reduced to a small stump as well. Same reason. Well, no earthquake this time, just the rising sea levels.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    14. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if you look close enough they actually show the british isles -- but not the water between them and the continent (european integration driven too far?)

      what they don't show is iceland...

    15. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/Karamba/Keramik/ to make sense?

    16. Re:Screenshots by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      I'm looking at them again and can't really see how anyone would think they're not highly Luna like. I agree that the lack of colouring on the window control buttons is a vast improvement on Microsoft's original, but it, and the slightly less rounded corners, appear to be the only serious changes. It's a shame the whole blue frames and seriously ugly "shadowed" text was copied wholesale. It's not as if the buttons are the only aspects of Luna that are hideous and unprofessional.

      Looks ugly to me, but I must admit I find most modern GUIs butt-ugly. That said, I thought most people agreed about Luna. It's one thing for geeks to immediately retheme an OS the moment they install it, but when every Joe User is doing it too, then there's a problem.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Screenshots by northcat · · Score: 1

      Everyone loves only pretty pictures.

    18. Re:Screenshots by MrNiCeGUi · · Score: 1

      I definitely agree about Luna being ugly. But this KDE theme is more similar with Watercolor, the theme used in Whistler Beta2. I liked the fact that the window controls were not standing out from the background since I already hit them by reflex and without looking at this point. This theme has that. Also the blue shade is not the violent blue in Luna.
      It's not the prettiest theme, but it's not ugly and it's very functional. At least in my opinion.

    19. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa! Excellent fonts. They are like the old antialiased fonts but not as big and blurry.

    20. Re:Screenshots by uradu · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. It's not like there aren't much more attractive LCD fonts out there, if the default clock must indeed have the LCD look. Yes, it can be changed, but come on now, let's have a nicer default!

    21. Re:Screenshots by IdleTime · · Score: 0, Troll

      PrettY? Maybe...
      Totally useles? Yes.

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    22. Re:Screenshots by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      You want an even worse imitation of Luna Silver, try the "Lipstik" theme. It even inverts the gradients of plastik, giving them that concave look of XP. I don't think either of them invert the gradient for the click effect though (which looks like, as one UI person put it, "flexing, like so much cheap plastic"). Plastik's window decoration buttons are also nice and flat, whereas XP's stick out in a style similar to the hideous keramic.

      You want screaming garish themes, you know where to go.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    23. Re:Screenshots by bhalo05 · · Score: 1

      I could rant also but I prefer to be a little more constructive...

      Adobe Reader 7 is available for Linux, now. And if you use Gentoo, 'emerge acroread' suffices :)

    24. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, no, it's not. That translucency is horrible, and the way KDE's widgets are laid out still hasn't changed. For instance, menus are too close to each other.

      Surely, this is not what's considered pretty in the OSS world. All I'd have to do is post a screenshot of OS X, and the discussion would be over.

    25. Re:Screenshots by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      The w does look heavier. Maybe a scaling artifact? (don't know if those were scaled or not) Or maybe just crappy default fonts.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    26. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather have apps start with a K than spell any word "gawd". I guess being stupid is your place in the /. community.

    27. Re:Screenshots by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Informative

      It sure looks a lot like Plastik to me...

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    28. Re:Screenshots by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      and the way KDE's widgets are laid out still hasn't changed. For instance, menus are too close to each other.

      If you look closely at the screenshot you will see that both apps where you can see the menu, are NOT KDE apps (xchat and gaim). Your point may in fact be valid but I hope it wasn't inferred solely from the screenshot.

      -kaplanfx

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    29. Re:Screenshots by theantix · · Score: 1

      Slight correction, those are things about Xandros Linux that piss you off, not Linux itself. My distribution takes under a minute to boot, has a nice simple clean look by default, has firefox installed and on the panel by default, can handle any PDFs that are out there, and has apt-get working wonderfully with a nice gui and when you install an app it shows up on the menu. It has the same screensaver issue and can't play shockwave, and has rebooting from a menu item not as a button. I'm not going to post what distribution I'm using because that would just turn this into a pissing contest, I'm just saying that pretty much every complaint you had is about Xandros Linux and not about Linux itself.

      There are still things that piss me off, but far far fewer than piss me off about using MS Windows.

      --
      501 Not Implemented
    30. Re:Screenshots by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      But surely the complete translation of the GUI into British English

      The only en_* translation listed there is en_UK; does this mean that en_US, en_CA (what colour are your tires? :-)), en_AU, and en_NZ aren't available (well, maybe the latter two, and perhaps en_CA, could use en_UK as a "good enough" version)? (I may be a Yank, but I certainly hope it doesn't mean en_US is the "default", so that an en_US version wouldn't be considered a translation!)

    31. Re:Screenshots by webhed123 · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, and about Gentoo... If I wanted to spend 6 months figuring out how to install an operating system it would be the perfect os.

    32. Re:Screenshots by webhed123 · · Score: 0

      I have tried Redhat, Mandrake, and Lycoris, and they all take substantially longer to boot and log into than XP. I'm in no way saying that Windows is better because it boots faster, but it still bugs me either way.

      Sure mine can have a nice simple clean look too but I wasn't really complaining about a simple clean interface.

      Xandros came with Firefox installed and on the panel also, but I downloaded a newer version and installed that but it didn't add itself to the panel/menu.

      Sure Acrobat 5 can open PDF's, that wasn't really my complaint. My complaint was (obviously enough) with Adobe for not providing an equivalent Linux version to their Windows version. I'm only saying they didn't provide it because I went to the Adobe website and it only served version 5 when I told it what os I was running and it said thats all that was available. I didn't really feel like searching all over their site or elsewhere for it. I figured if Adobe said 5 was the best there is then thats all there is.

      I was using apt-get via commandline and it said I needed to update the mirror list or something. To be honest I didnt do an exhaustive seach of the system to see if there was a gui method or not. I'm sure I could easily update the mirror list or whatever it was it said it needed to do but I was just tired of messing with it. I just want it to work, out of the box. If I had to configure Add/Remove Programs in Windows just so I could install something I'd understand that thats just the way it is, but I don't. It just *works* in Windows.

      If apt-get will add to the panel/menu when used properly then I suppose I need to spend some more time figuring it out.

      In general, I really like Xandros. It played DVD's automatically and in general is quite nice. It just irks me to no end when I see silly stuff like 200 screensavers but it takes me 5 times longer to reboot and login than windows. I see 50 different email clients but they can't figure out that the default clock looks like crap.

      *sigh*

    33. Re:Screenshots by webhed123 · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, I forgot, I have also used Suse quite a bit. The reboot/login time is comparable. I don't know why it has to take so much longer, but it does. Maybe Linux in general doesn't like a lot of peripherals or something.

      I have 3 hard drives (scsi, ata, & ide), a dvd burner, a cd burner, a usb mini hub, a printer, a usb optical wheel mouse, and usb microsoft keyboard, plus soundcard, video card, and all other normal hardware. I don't know why, it just takes a lot longer to boot into various flavors of linux than it does XP.

    34. Re:Screenshots by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 1

      It is similar to Luna in the way that the window's border that touches the title bar is the same color as the title bar.

      I don't think it's as close to Luna as you're suggesting, tho: the title bar's default size is far more reasonable; it only uses one color, rather than the blue/green combination in Windows XP; the blue is a softer blue; the window manipulation buttons aren't colored in a bad attempt to copy Mac's Aqua theme (for instance, XP's close button is a hideous orange).

      Perhaps if somebody provided side-by-side screenshots, we wouldn't find strong agreement from everybody that the two are similar.

      In fact, I find the screenshots reasonably appealing. Certainly the best default KDE theme I've ever seen.

    35. Re:Screenshots by fLameDogg · · Score: 0
      You'll notice Florida's been reduced to a small stump as well.

      Well, we did entertain four hurricanes last year.

      --
      fD
    36. Re:Screenshots by strider44 · · Score: 1

      That would be because they are using anti-aliased small fonts with a low resolution desktop.

    37. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes less than a minute for me to get from cold hardware to a loaded X session. Slackware 10, Athlon 2500+.

      If I'm using software suspend, on the other hand, it takes a bit less than 30 seconds.

      Essentially the same amount of hardware as you. No idea how fast Windows boots on it.

    38. Re:Screenshots by trans_err · · Score: 1

      Actually its quite useful-- runs incredibly fast (on a rather dated system), and allows me to easily distinguish between apps in focus and not. The transparency allows me to see active changes in apps running in the background.

    39. Re:Screenshots by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Does it look like Windows? Of course it does! It has a title bar on top! Sheesh...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    40. Re:Screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like the printing in kindergarten workbooks.

    41. Re:Screenshots by webhed123 · · Score: 0

      Well I'm only running a 1.1ghz athlon w/700~ ram so I can understand why I might be slow. If I were on a 2500+ I suppose it might be a tad quicker.

      Also, are you running KDE or Gnome or something else? I can see how one of them would make the logging in part slower though I don't think they'd have much to the general boot time.

    42. Re:Screenshots by richlv · · Score: 1

      according to this screenshot it's plastik.
      http://shots.osdir.com/slideshows/slideshow.php?re lease=265&slide=44

      i've never seen 'luna' you refer to, but plastik is available in kde 3.3.2, too. actually, it's funny - a couple of weeks ago my brother set plastik on his computer. i saw that, thought "ohh, nice, i'll use this one from now on". now i see that kde has defaulted to my choice. nnnnice :)

      --
      Rich
    43. Re:Screenshots by bhalo05 · · Score: 1

      If you need 6 months for that, you need to improve your reading skills. It took me an evening following the excellent handbook when I was nearly a newbie. Go figure...

    44. Re:Screenshots by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      afaik, kde replaces strings with native language strings, so color would be default, but with the en_GB language pack, it would be colour.

    45. Re:Screenshots by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      i use galaxy classic from mandrake-artwork, seems to be the best available window theme for kde at the moment.

    46. Re:Screenshots by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      gentoo.org

      the docs on there are the best docs i have ever seen for an OS - simple, to the point yet detailed.

    47. Re:Screenshots by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

      And global warming has put nearly all of Florida underwater.

    48. Re:Screenshots by webhed123 · · Score: 0

      My point being that I shouldn't have to study anything in order to install an OS. It should be click click click yes yes ok ok done. I shouldnt have to spend hours reading just to install the damn thing. I dont have time for this I have kids and a job and a life. I am not using the OS to learn how to use the OS, I am using the OS to enable me to do the things I really want to do. Its like if I had to read a book about how to use a toaster. Its a damn toaster. Just toast the bread so I can have warm crunchy bread. I'm really not interested in learning the internal wiring diagrams of the thing, I just want warm crunchy bread.

    49. Re:Screenshots by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      bootup times are being worked on by many people. they should improve some time in the future hopefully. if you google, there's things you can do to improve boot times for youself.

    50. Re:Screenshots by cmbofh · · Score: 1

      Your point is none at all because you don't have to. It just means that Gentoo is not for you. I agree, there should be distros for you, and there are. But you have no right claiming "an OS has to be such and such.". There are different people, ones that value different aspects in a distro higher. Please speak only for yourself, do yourself a favour and pick a commercial end-user distro.

      - from a non-Gentoo user

  7. Kubuntu??? by m50d · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know linux naming conventions are pretty bad, but really, this takes the biscuit.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Kubuntu??? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      yeah? what's up with all the K stuff? Did Ed Boon and John Tobias invent KDE or something? lol...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    2. Re:Kubuntu??? by Eberlin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it's based on Ubuntu Linux...Ubuntu means something like "Humanity to others" (the ubuntu.com page will explain this much better than I can) The distro is GNOME based...so the natural thing to do is to slap a K in front of it and it's now KDE-based! Thus Kubuntu. :)

      I've got an Ubuntu installation, btw, and it's pretty cool. Hardware detection was great, runs fairly well on my old 400MHZ PII, and the whole synaptic thing makes for very easy updating. I may eventually try the Kubuntu as I'm looking for that Debian-based KDE-using distro. Currently looking at Mepis but haven't tried it yet.

    3. Re:Kubuntu??? by wpmegee · · Score: 1

      Gesundheit!

    4. Re:Kubuntu??? by Klivian · · Score: 1

      It's usability, something like 99.9% of those who know the Ubuntu Linux distribution immediately understands what Kubuntu are.

    5. Re:Kubuntu??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gesundheit!

      That's Kesundheit you insensitive GNOME troll!

    6. Re:Kubuntu??? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Why not UbuntuK?

    7. Re:Kubuntu??? by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I couldn't get the stupid thing to run at all. It just hung on boot. I was going to use it as a coaster, but a friend of mine wanted the CD so I gave it to him instead.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Kubuntu??? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I know linux naming conventions are pretty bad, but really, this takes the biscuit.

      You are aware that languages other than English exist right?

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:Kubuntu??? by pyros · · Score: 1
      Why not UbuntuK?

      because that sounds like the south park councelor visiting africa, rather than the KDE version of ubuntu.

    10. Re:Kubuntu??? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's even worse when you end up replacing C with K throughout the entire environment. How am I supposed to take it seriously when it seems to be written by a script kiddy? Oh wait...

    11. Re:Kubuntu??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Don't tell me, they're those things... er, with the ears, and the antennae and, er, hold on, hold on, they're covered in fur and make meeping noises like meep meep.

      Did I get it right?

    12. Re:Kubuntu??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kunt.

    13. Re:Kubuntu??? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      I think you ment Kesundheit ;)

      Gesundheit would be for the *other* desktop...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:Kubuntu??? by DickBreath · · Score: 1
      Maybe you're just behind the times?

      Look at the words that have become mainstream
      • Linux
      • www
      • Blog
      • Google (googling as a verb)
      • IM
      Also look how many acronyms: P2P, PDF, MSN, AOL, etc.

      So why complain about a few KDE names? Most of these app names would not be an impediment to being a "mainstream" name if someone had a killer software idea.
      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
    15. Re:Kubuntu??? by HawaiianMayan · · Score: 1

      You mean skript kiddie.

    16. Re:Kubuntu??? by ZephyrXero · · Score: 1

      I think just "Ubuntu - KDE Edition" would be a more appropriate name.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    17. Re:Kubuntu??? by fLameDogg · · Score: 0
      Ubuntu means something like "Humanity to others"

      I assume someone's checked to be sure that "Kubuntu" doesn't mean something like "please make my wife heavy with child."

      --
      fD
    18. Re:Kubuntu??? by DownloadTHIS · · Score: 1

      I completely agree about the name scheme. They have no creativity. And if they did, they'd spell that with a 'K' too.

    19. Re:Kubuntu??? by m50d · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of where it comes from, but still, it seems a really horrible name. I've heard good things about Mepis though I haven't installed it myself.

      --
      I am trolling
    20. Re:Kubuntu??? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Many of the gnome ones are worse. And sometimes it works out, like with Kasablanca. But the "Ku" just doesn't sound like a good sound at all.

      --
      I am trolling
    21. Re:Kubuntu??? by m50d · · Score: 1

      Oh yes. But does "Kubuntu" sound anything like a real word in any of them? Gnubuntu or something would work.

      --
      I am trolling
    22. Re:Kubuntu??? by XnR'rn · · Score: 0

      But Ku does sound like a good sound!
      There's a language in which ku means all and any words (with only few exceptions), somewhere .

    23. Re:Kubuntu??? by cmbofh · · Score: 1

      According to this source it actually does not only sound like one: http://dot.kde.org/1111118006/1111143814/

    24. Re:Kubuntu??? by m50d · · Score: 1

      I don't know, maybe on its own. But Ubuntu seems to me to be a warm, rounded word, perhaps just by association with their softly warmly themed Gnome look. Wheras the K is a very hard, technological sound, which contrasts badly with the rest of the word.

      --
      I am trolling
    25. Re:Kubuntu??? by XnR'rn · · Score: 0

      Um, if you followed the link, and read the comments about the reference in questions, I'd concur, that Ku-buntu, is something of an oxymoron (at least within the frame of that reference).

  8. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In three months, we'll have a story about how it runs on gentoo.

    1. Re:Nice by fox8118 · · Score: 1

      To be honest I like what Gentoo has done with the KDE 3.4 ebuilds. They basically split up the packages so that you can only install what you want and leave all of the fluff out.

      More information here:
      http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/kde-split-ebuilds. html

    2. Re:Nice by Terrasque · · Score: 0

      And a year from now, Debian might even have it in the unstable branch.

      --
      It's The Golden Rule: "He who has the gold makes the rules."
    3. Re:Nice by iminplaya · · Score: 5, Funny

      In about three hours we'll have a story about KDE 3.4 being released.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I could have told you yesterday after I finished emerging 3.4 what it what it was like. 99% like the rc1, stable as ever, and very fast and light on memory usage. It just sucks to have a distro and desktop manager that just works and is always the latest and greatest.

    5. Re:Nice by micromoog · · Score: 1

      What's the procedure for people who don't want to jump through a lot of hoops, and basically just want the 3.4 versions of everything they have now?

    6. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unmask 3.4 and emerge kde, same as you will have done for 3.3. The split ebuilds are just an option, they won't because the default until 4.0.

    7. Re:Nice by micromoog · · Score: 1

      So what then? At some point will users have to manually unmerge all of KDE and manually re-merge each package?

    8. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      At some point will users have to manually unmerge all of KDE and manually re-merge each package?

      Doubtful; you can unmerge all of KDE 3.3 with a one-liner today, search the Gentoo forum/docs for it.

      Dunno what you mean by "manually" re-merging the package; KDE major releases are slotted so you can run two versions at once - so you aren't going to get 3.4 magically turn into 4.0 when you run emerge -u world. This is normal and by design.

    9. Re:Nice by geekanarchy · · Score: 1

      Actually, a large portion of Gentoo users, myself included, use distcc to speed the compile. I could start the compile tonight before I go to sleep and it would be finished by the time I woke up.

      Shame on you for perpetuating nasty Gentoo myths!

    10. Re:Nice by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      So can I and I don't use distcc, I've got an athlon xp running at 1600MHz.

      If you set all your settings properly, multithread the builds (-j3), enable DMA and readahead on your drives, and keep your CFLAGS sane, the build shouldn't take longer than 15 or so hours on a similar system.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    11. Re:Nice by diablobsb · · Score: 1

      And in about 6 years we will have a story about it being included in Debian...

      --
      I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
    12. Re:Nice by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

      In three months, we'll have a story about how it runs on gentoo


      More like 3 days with the gentoo crowd.

      <insert obligatory joke about when kde 3.4 will make it into Debian stable >
    13. Re:Nice by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Try amd64...

      Granted, you'll be lucky if it builds on the first try... :)

      (Just kidding - the amd64 devs do a great job but this is not the arch for the faint of heart.)

    14. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what dick, if you'll look at Gentoo's forums you'll see that people were successfully building KDE 3.4 before it was officially released. Nice uneducated flamebait, though.

    15. Re:Nice by reverius · · Score: 1

      emerge -uavD --newuse world

    16. Re:Nice by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the amd64 chips would be faster at the builds than the athlon-xp. I'm not sure why, but I remember hearing it somewhere. Maybe more registers to play with, so less 'pressure' on GCC to find working configs?

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    17. Re:Nice by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, it is DEFINITELY faster. The extra regs are the biggest factor, but there are other improvements as well. There is also less CFLAG variation since right now there is really only one amd64 feature-set.

      However, it is a little less bug-free.

      Seriously, though, amd64 on gentoo does work fairly well - I use it for everything, and I have a 32-bit chroot for the few packages that don't work well. The only thing that gets messy is when you have a 32/64-bit browser and want to use plugins that are 64/32-bit. You can run 32-bit apps linked to 32-bit so's, and 64-bit linked to 64-bit, but you can't link the two together.

  9. kde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and with the advent of qt4 maybe we'll be running KDE on windows sometimes soon?

  10. Highlights URL by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.kde.org/announcements/announce-3.4.php

    Highlights at a glance

    * Text-to-speech system with support built into Konqueror, Kate, KPDF and the standalone application KSayIt
    * Support for text to speech synthesis is integrated with the desktop
    * Completely redesigned, more flexible trash system
    * Kicker with improved look and feel
    * KPDF now enables you to select, copy & paste text and images from PDFs, along with many other improvements
    * Kontact supports now various groupware servers, including eGroupware, GroupWise, Kolab, OpenGroupware.org and SLOX
    * Kopete supports Novell Groupwise and Lotus Sametime and gets integrated into Kontact
    * DBUS/HAL support allows to keep dynamic device icons in media:/ and on the desktop in sync with the state of all devices
    * KHTML has improved standard support and now close to full support for CSS 2.1 and the CSS 3 Selectors module
    * Better synchronization between 2 PCs
    * A new high contrast style and a complete monochrome icon set
    * An icon effect to paint all icons in two chosen colors, converting third party application icons into high contrast monochrome icons
    * Akregator allows you to read news from your favourite RSS-enabled websites in one application
    * Juk has now an album cover management via Google Image Search
    * KMail now stores passwords securely with KWallet
    * SVG files can now be used as wallpapers
    * KHTML plug-ins are now configurable, so the user can selectively disable ones that are not used. This does not include Netscape-style plug-ins. Netscape plug-in in CPU usage can be manually lowered, and plug-ins are more stable.
    * more than 6,500 bugs have been fixed
    * more than 1,700 wishes have been fullfilled
    * more than 80,000 contributions with several million lines of code and documentation added or changed

    1. Re:Highlights URL by Infinityis · · Score: 2, Funny

      * more than 1,700 wishes have been fullfilled

      (glances around room)

      Shucks...still no Red Ryder BB gun. Maybe with the next release. Guess, I'll just keep play with my decoder ring and drink some Ovaltine.

    2. Re:Highlights URL by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      YOU'LL SHOOT YOUR EYE OUT!

    3. Re:Highlights URL by johannesg · · Score: 1
      Text-to-speech system

      A new high contrast style and a complete monochrome icon set

      I'll be damned - it is AmigaOS come back from the dead!

  11. BSD? Huh? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    BSD: KDE 3.4 Released

    Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  12. from BSD: to Linux: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is there no category for GUI development etc yet?

    it could just as easily have stayed in BSD: could it not?

  13. Re:fat as ever? by topdogqqq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I actually use KDE as my default desktop but it's so so so fat !!!!

  14. awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey gnome don't have 80.000 developers
    isn't it ?

    1. Re:awesome by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Neither does KDE. We have around 800 developers with 100 commits each on average. Although fairly it is mostly 200 core developers with 100s of commits. Check CIA/a.

  15. gentoo users already have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the ebuilds are already up for gentoo though you may need to unmask them at the moment.

    i should add the really cool thing this brings for gentoo users is the way kde packages have been split up to allow only the needed packages to be installed

    1. Re:gentoo users already have it by l0perb0y · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah, but if you emerge it now, you'll be sorry as the -r1 ebuild will probably come out in a couple days so you'll have to rebuild the bastard.

    2. Re:gentoo users already have it by bkubi · · Score: 1
      nope..

      emerge kde-meta

      You only need to recompile the package that actually changed with gentoos new split ebuilds. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml

    3. Re:gentoo users already have it by vdboor · · Score: 1
      Re:gentoo users already have it

      So do SuSE users, but without the cpu cycles required to compile the beast. :-) Compiling KDE tool 1 full day on my AMB1800, now it's installed in 10 minutes.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2 ;-)
  16. Why is this under BSD??? by Scaz7 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why is this story under BSD???

    1. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Ritalin16 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It looks like its under linux too

      --
      In soviet Russia, Linux compiles YOU!
    2. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by m50d · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But it was for a few minutes primarily bsd, with the bsd red colour scheme.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is "its under linux"? It has an "underlinux", like underpants?

    4. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by SmokeHalo · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Big Stupid Deal?

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
    5. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, No a BSD has a _BLUE_ color scheme (yes, I've spent to much time fixing windows boxes lately)

    6. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why does it bother you??? You're like my brother when I was a kid, getting your trousers in a twist just because you have to share mom and dad with another sibling.

      Seriously, KDE is a desktop for BOTH Linux and BSD (and SysV). So you will find this same story under both sections.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    7. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you touch yourself at night.

    8. Re:Why is this under BSD??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not. It's under n00bix. See here.

  17. This encapsulates obligatory GNOME rox posts by syntap · · Score: 0

    You can thank me by down-modding this lame post.

  18. Re:fat as ever? by m50d · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually it performs better with every x.y release, although the new features will weigh against that for real speed. But they're taking a breath ready to make KDE 4 the most bloaty ever. (Disclaimer: I'm actually a KDE fan, I do know qt4 brings a lot of speed improvements, but I also expect this to be true at least of the 4.0 release)

    --
    I am trolling
  19. Screenshots ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New theme huh ? The screenshots section on the kde page doesn't include any 3.4 screens... PLZ post a link, thanks.

    Gnome is still has a slicker interface, too bad the devs have isolated themselves from the community, unlike the KDE guys. More power to em if thats what they want.

    Will gnome ever have a menu editor ? And if so.. will they package it in gnome-extras.. as if the whole thing never happened ? Probably.

    1. Re:Screenshots ? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Why do you need a "menu editor"? You can drag items around to your heart's content, right click to move/copy/delete etc.

    2. Re:Screenshots ? by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Now try explaining that to every 2nd person who posts on the GNOME mailing lists requesting a menu editor (GNOME doesn't have one, but you can right-click to edit it).

      Needless to say, it's coming in 2.12

      The screenshots look very "crystallic" and it looks like it's full of eye candy, but I think I'll stick with GNOME.

    3. Re:Screenshots ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can move/copy/delete, but you cannot add. Tried with latest Ubuntu Hoary Preview (gnome 2.10). Not even applications:/// in nautilus worked.

    4. Re:Screenshots ? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      You most certainly can. I'm using gnome 2.8 from Debian Unstable

  20. Re:fat as ever? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It runs fine on anything made in the last four years. If your system is older than that and it's too slow for you, try XFCE. The rest of us KDE and Gnome users will welcome you into the fold the next time you upgrade.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  21. Re:BSD? Huh? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
    Nevermind. Just got changed to Linux:KDE 3.4 released.

    Damn Slashdot Editors... and stuff. :)

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  22. $subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    $item is cool. Thanks $item developers!

    1. Re:$subject by PhilRod · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you find a feature you like, fire off an email to thank the developer - it can make someone's day, and it's nice to see one's work being used and enjoyed.

      You can find the relevant person for any KDE app with Help->"About " in the menus, or you can find plenty of developers on the kde-core-devel@kde.org and kde-devel@kde.org lists. And don't forget the artists, translators, promo team, accessibility team, doc writers, and the many other people who make KDE happen.

      --
      KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
    2. Re:$subject by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is not kde compliant. Please prefix all variables with the letter 'k'. Thank you.

  23. Re:fat as ever? by topdogqqq · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Define Fine. KDE on a 2.5 Ghz box is nowhere near as fast as windows 98 on a 233 mhz machine. The dialogs are just fat !

  24. Great release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very polished, much cleaner than before, faster, insanely great new KPDF, all in all really nice.

    I think this is a worthy ending to KDE3 and really makes me look forward to what's in store for KDE4.

    Congratulations devs, well done.

  25. Re:BSD? Huh? by m50d · · Score: 1

    It's the most popular desktop environment for BSD? It lets KDE and GNOME stories be put in separate sections so we don't get quite as many flamewars?

    --
    I am trolling
  26. National Weather Service Alert by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Funny

    The National Weather Service has issued an alert for the entirety of the United States. An unusual buildup of heat is expected over the next few days related to a sudden and massive increase in processor usage of select personal computers across the country.

    This alert is based off of previous temperature surges related to the release of the 'KDE' software package to users of the 'Gentoo' operating system. As another release of this package has just occurred, the National Weather Service is issuing this alert so relief organizations can be prepared. Special attention is to be paid to the south-western united states due to unseasonably high temperatures, and high concentrations of personal computer equipment.

    An additional National Weather Service extreme temperature WARNING has been issued for the Silicon Valley region.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
    1. Re:National Weather Service Alert by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      Funny, but everyone knows that only 0.00001% of gentoo users use KDE (I am one of them). Most gentooers use [open|flux]box, fvwm, or gnome.

      (assuming the monthly Desktop Pics threads are representative)

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    2. Re:National Weather Service Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the KDE users are the ones too busy getting on with the process of _using_ their computer to waste time posting pictures ;)

    3. Re:National Weather Service Alert by 21chrisp · · Score: 1

      Don't forget XFCE. I'm not sure Gnome is much more popular on Gentoo than KDE.. I'd be willing to bet that it isn't.

    4. Re:National Weather Service Alert by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      You're probably right. Oh, and I forgot enlightenment too.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  27. Re:BSD? Huh? by spektr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try reloading the frontpage several times. The category will change between BSD and Linux randomly.

  28. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  29. for zealots by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Look here zealots. You have your work cut out. Let the GNOME/KDE flames begin.

    1. Re:for zealots by pebs · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look here zealots. You have your work cut out. Let the GNOME/KDE flames begin.

      Gnome and KDE both kick ass!

      They are way better than the over-hyped OS X interface.. :P

      --
      #!/
    2. Re:for zealots by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      They are way better than the over-hyped OS X interface.. :P Which is many times better than that nasty explorer interface...

    3. Re:for zealots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true

  30. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell has it got to do with Linux? KDE even runs on cygwin.

  31. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually use KDE as my default desktop but it's so so so phat!!!!

  32. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BSD: KDE 3.4 Released

    Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?


    Now that this topic is under Linux:, I can ask the same question - what does KDE have to do with Linux?

    KDE is independent of either.

  33. Inefficiency by happymedium · · Score: 1

    Looking at all these change highlights makes me question the development process of these huge window managers--GNOME as well as KDE. Why do they spend so much effort developing new apps for every common task? For example, why is there a KOffice and GNOME Office when I can just use OpenOffice instead? Why Kopete, when I could use Gaim? It seems that the developers' time would be better spent improving the core functions of the window manager.

    1. Re:Inefficiency by mgkimsal2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are a few basic replies to this.

      1. You're assuming all 'developers' have the same level of competency and interests. Just because there are 100 contributors doesn't mean that 100 contributors all working on 'window shading' together would make things better, or even be efficient.

      2. KDE (and Gnome) are much more than 'Window Managers'. If that's all you want, use something else.

      I do agree that it seems that there are some redundant projects, but seeing multiple projects and code can continue to spur development of projects. If Kopete sees something in Gaim, they can add that feature, or vice versa.

      Politics comes into it too. Just because someone contributed something to Gaim doesn't mean the Gaim devs would take the contribution. Having multiple projects for people to contribute to could be seen as fostering innovation, not splitting resources, as more people can express themselves, and (hopefully) the best ideas float to the top.

      Whether the whole open source community is a true meritocracy or not is another matter, though I tend to think in most cases it's closer to that than other development models.

    2. Re:Inefficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Gaim when I could use Kopete? ;) I use aMSN

      KDE and GNOME are not Windows Managers, they are Desktop Enviroments, which implies all applications for daily use. Also KDE focuses on integration, Kopete's contact list is integrated on other applications.

    3. Re:Inefficiency by SirTalon42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is still a KOffice because the developers of KOffice started working on it before OOo existed, and right now its MUCH lighter than OOo and has most of the features, and has several extra things.

      "It seems that the developers' time would be better spent improving the core functions of the window manager."

      The developers will spend their time doing what they want to do (and most likely are best at), if they didn't spend it working on program X, they wouldn't necessarily be spending it working on program Y.

    4. Re:Inefficiency by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      err...
      You mean before open office became open source? possible, but unlikely, that was years before the first koffice was included in kde.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Inefficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean before open office became open source?

      Open Office has always been open-source. Perhaps you are thinking of Star Office? Star Office is to Open Office what Netscape is to Mozilla.

    6. Re:Inefficiency by m50d · · Score: 1

      Because kopete is better and better integrated, and KOffice can run on 64mb machines. Not all platforms have gnome and OOo. The aim of KDE is not to be a window manager but a complete desktop environment. Which means everything you want to do, you should be able to do with a kde app.

      --
      I am trolling
    7. Re:Inefficiency by Klivian · · Score: 1

      No, it's like he says. The first version of KOffice was released in '99 or something, at that time open office did not exist. It was however a closed source office suite called Star Office, which Sun bought in the summer the same year. Later on, Sun opened this code and called it OpenOffice. But this was 2002 or thereabouts.

    8. Re:Inefficiency by Tyreth · · Score: 1

      Here's your answer:
      Please don't make me use gaim over sim-icq.

      Please don't make me use openoffice over koffice.

      I prefer the latter in both cases.

    9. Re:Inefficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diversity, of course. It's like an application gene pool.

    10. Re:Inefficiency by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that KOffice was Open Office, tweaked to run as smoothly (and more importantly, match the style of KDE) as possible within KDE itself. I use GAIM inside of KDE, never got used to Kopete.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    11. Re:Inefficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the OOo KDE Integration is another project. Visit http://www.koffice.org/

    12. Re:Inefficiency by teprrr · · Score: 1

      Um, and KOffice isn't still included in KDE. It has is own release cycle and so on.

  34. Re:BSD? Huh? by timothy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?

    Mr. Helmet:

    Well, KDE has about as much to do with BSD as it does with Linux :) Popular desktop on both.

    My intent was to make it basically in the Linux section (since many more KDE users are using Linux -- I assert, without numbers, just observation, and I could be wrong, and a moose once bit my sister and and and), cross-listed in the BSD section.

    A peculiarity of the Slashdot backend means I picked the wrong order / weighting for KDE vs. Linux; I updated the story to fix this. No slight is meant toward Linux users, BSD users, Gnome users, those who enjoy boiled eggs with dill of a winter evening ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  35. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Moon Phase Display?!?!?!?! Who in the hell needs a dynamic MOON PHASE display???

    The lupinomorphically challenged, for one.
  36. Here's the good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't need it, noone is forcing you to install a dynamic MOON PHASE display.

    This way, people that want such a thing can have it and people that don't want it, don't have to bother.

    It's an inasanely great concept, isn't it?

  37. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by avalys · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First of all, that thing has been there since KDE 1.0. It's a toy, and I doubt it requires much maintenance, so why not leave it in? What do you expect from something in the "kdetoys" package, anyway?

    Second, the current moon phase is very important for amateur astronomers. A full moon makes it nearly impossible to see anything but the brightest objects in the sky, because of the glare. Also, if you want to look at the moon itself, the best time is not when it's full (because everything is so bright and washed out), but when it's at approximately 1/2 phase, because the shadows show depth.

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
  38. I'm waiting for e17 by michelcultivo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm still waiting and using the e17 window manager, let's see when the "usable" releases will come.

    1. Re:I'm waiting for e17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insert GNU/Hurd joke here.

  39. Re:fat as ever? by x2A · · Score: 1

    I compiled it from CVS (and done recompiles on some of the cvs modules every few days) - including koffice, extra artwork etc, and plenty other stuff I don't really need, my /opt/kde dir is taking up ~400meg. However, it is running much smoother now than it has done in the past.

    But I have to say it's looking sweet. Linux for the desktop has always been missing the polish, but with all the extra features from x.org and kde, it's now able to give the other major 2 a run for their money in the eye candy department.

    -2A

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  40. Re:fat as ever? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats just untrue. KDE 3.2 (with eyecandy turned off) ran as well at windows 98 on my girlfriends pentium-MMX 233 in slackware.

  41. Time to rewrite from scratch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not a great developer but anytime I see a project that has 6,500 bug fixes I start to wonder if it's not time to rewrite that program.

    1. Re:Time to rewrite from scratch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anytime I see a project that has 6,500 bug fixes I start to wonder if it's not time to rewrite that program.

      Yes, because as we all know, when you rewrite something, you eliminate all the bugs and don't introduce any new ones.

      This is a large project. 6,500 bug fixes seems quite low to me.

    2. Re:Time to rewrite from scratch? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      and if most of them were minor fixes and enhancements rather than crippling flaws?

  42. Microsoft's Spin by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Funny

    KDE 3.4 weighs in at 6,500+ bug fixes,

    Today, EDS released a report on the quality of open source software.
    Citing over 6,000 known bugs in KDE 3.3 versus zero known bugs in Microsoft Windows, Senior EDS Industry Analyst Joe Isuzu said, "There is no question that open source software is of very poor quality and completely unreliable, the evidence is very clear for anyone to see. Microsoft Windows is head and shoulders above the free alternatives, downhill in a hurricane."

    1. Re:Microsoft's Spin by sammcj2000 · · Score: 0

      perhaps its because they haven't /bothered/ looking for bugs in their software...

  43. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by ex-geek · · Score: 1
    Moon Phase Display?!?!?!?! Who in the hell needs a dynamic MOON PHASE display???
    It's for us lunatics who use KDE of course. ;-)
  44. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Fenris+Ulf · · Score: 1

    That's been in kdetoys since 2.x at least, hasn't it?

    If you don't want the "toys", don't install "kdetoys".

  45. s'more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In North Korea only old people use KDE.
    I'd prefer a desktop with a smelly foot as a logo.
    Yeah, but does it run Linux?

  46. Anything but menu editing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCNR.

  47. Crap by bird603568 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Last week I just upgraded to kde 3.3 because i figured it has allthe buggs worked out. Oh well i wait a few months and get 3.4, only to have 3.5 come out a week later

    1. Re:Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 3.5 is in the plans currently. 4 is a long way off.

  48. Yeah but by rgf71 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it run on Windows? :)

    1. Re:Yeah but by SirTalon42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      KDE? Yes http://kde-cygwin.sf.net/. Newer versions should start being released once QT & KDE 4.0 are out.

    2. Re:Yeah but by m50d · · Score: 1

      Unlike most previous versions, no, it's not being ported because QT4 is going to be available natively for windows.

      --
      I am trolling
  49. Transparency feats by jsrlepage · · Score: 1

    There is, somewhere i saw in RC1, transparency and shading feats. Stabilize them and i'm all KDE.

    --
    This is my opinion. Everyone has a right to my opinion.
    1. Re:Transparency feats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to ask the Xorg team, not KDE.

    2. Re:Transparency feats by trans_err · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's stable and it's wonderful:
      Kubuntu with default transparency and shadow options
      Pretty eh?

    3. Re:Transparency feats by iswm · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can do it with any window manager. You just need to enable composite (assuming you use xorg).

      --
      Buckethead
    4. Re:Transparency feats by PhilRod · · Score: 1

      While we're on the topic, does anyone know of a use for transparency apart from pretty eye candy? For all the fuss that's made about it (and not to take anything away from the effort of the X.org folks), I can't think of a particular use. Any suggestions?

      --
      KDE Documentation Team: http://i18n.kde.org/doc
    5. Re:Transparency feats by Klivian · · Score: 1

      Beats me, keeping your GPU warm?

    6. Re:Transparency feats by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      While we're on the topic, does anyone know of a use for transparency apart from pretty eye candy?

      A transparent kruler could be pretty handy.

    7. Re:Transparency feats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      several, but they all have to do with graphical design, besides the "cool" factor, it is an interesting feature that might allow us to develop applications that utilize it in ways we have not yet considered, at any rate, it is very nice to have the option.

    8. Re:Transparency feats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woah 8^D And I've been thinking lately about how sick I am of Fedora...

    9. Re:Transparency feats by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      The only practical use I can think of at all is to keep track of what windows are bordering your current one -- might make managing several smaller windows easier?

    10. Re:Transparency feats by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I for one would use it to show difference between focused window and unfocused windows. Like, if you had two windows on the screen, and you focused on one of them, the unfocued windows would fade in to background by becoming partially transparent. That seems like an effective way of focusing users attention to the relevant window

      Another thing would be to use it for notifications. Instead of having a dialog-box in front of you, you could have a nice, unobtrusive and partially transparent notification-box in the corner of the screen. You could still see it, but it wouldn't scream out "oooh, ooh! look at me!"

      then we could have times when the user wants to quickly check something, while still being able to see what's in the background. And it would also enable cool eye-candy. Like when closing a window. Instead of simply disappearing, it could fade in to the background.

      And besides, why isn't eye-candy a valid reason for some feature? People LOVE eye-candy!

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  50. Re:fat as ever? by topdogqqq · · Score: 0

    I have tested this on dozens of machines so I know what I am talking about. You just must not be the power user I am.

  51. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Eberlin · · Score: 1

    There's an interesting myth based on moon-phases. It's one that states people go a little nutty during a full moon. I've heard stories from hospitals, libraries, and other public places where there's a higher amount of "strange behavior" during full moons.

    Personally, I have the moon phase plugin for my gkrellm -- a somewhat-joking "heads-up" if you work with the general public.

    If nothing else, knowing the moon-phase can help a little with your nethack strategy, right?

    Then again, maybe I'm just another Lunatic.

  52. Re:fat as ever? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    Oh, please. KDE on my 1.4GHz Thunderbird is at least as fast as Win98, and comes with remote file access (via KIOSlaves), antialiased fonts, an object-oriented design that lets developers embed just about any application inside any other with minimal overhead (see Konqueror and Kontact which are just wrappers around various widgets), and about a million applications that many of us find far superior to their Windows counterparts.

    People who slag Gnome and KDE regarding speed seem to be under the bizarre impression that they're just GUIs, when they're actually far, far more. That's why I recommended XFCE for people with slow systems. It's more of a traditional window manager-type system - albeit with some pretty nice additional utilities - and runs great on my K6-3/333 laptop. You can't possibly compare a stripped down system like XFCE or Windows 98 to a full blown desktop environment, though.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  53. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do.....:)....very much.....:)

    What kinda geek R U that U don't?

  54. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Jeez, people get modded down for stating valid opinions now?"

    You must be new here...

  55. Trash by GerbilSoft · · Score: 3, Funny

    a revamped trash system

    Yes, now the Trash can has a Windows logo on it.

    1. Re:Trash by Zemplar · · Score: 1

      WTF with trash cans? When I delete something, I want it gone!!

      Replace trash can applet with incinerator!
      Or perhaps even complete with devilish FreeBSD Daemon devilishly dancing about?

    2. Re:Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, now the Trash can has a Windows logo on it

      Mine has a Windows logo IN it

    3. Re:Trash by uradu · · Score: 1

      The real improvement is the support for DD 5.1 Surround Sound. When that subwoofer kicks you off your seat with a mega burp, you'll really know that those files are gone.

    4. Re:Trash by Mornelithe · · Score: 1

      WTF with trash cans? When I delete something, I want it gone!!

      Then enable the delete context menu option that bypasses the trash, and use that.

      --

      I've come for the woman, and your head.

    5. Re:Trash by archen · · Score: 1

      On all the laptops that come in I remove the MS stickers on it. All the garbage cans in my office say "Made for Windows XP" =)

    6. Re:Trash by chefren · · Score: 1

      Considering that undeleting on a typical Linux system is hard, trashcans are ok. I'd like them to automatically empty when I logout, though.

  56. Clippy Cometh...... by BRock97 · · Score: 3, Funny
    "include built in Text to Speech"

    Exxccccelent. Soon, the final pieces for KDE Klippy will be complete and we will rule the KHelpCenter together! Just imagine it:


    I see you are trying to compile the latest Linux kernel. Would you like help with:
    • Configuring devices?
    • Configuring filesystems?
    • Reinstalling Windows XP?

    BWHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    1. Re:Clippy Cometh...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's Klippy... *duck*

    2. Re:Clippy Cometh...... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but he comes up by default when Konsole is launched. And the option to turn it of is 8 menu levels deep.

  57. sigh - "weighs" vs "weights" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mr. nitpic

  58. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows can afford to be slow. When people get new windows they get a
    new computer bundled along with it, generally.

    Free software can expect to be installed on old hardware only (at
    least when it's first discovered). While J. Random is discovering the
    movement on his windows machine, his hardware is aging.

    Therefore, speed is more important for the free software movement than
    it is for microsoft.

    The movement should really have kick ass support for hardware up to a
    decade old.

  59. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?

    About as much as it has to do with Linux; it's the leading desktop environment* for the BSDs.

    * Before you start to flame, take a look at things like the number of distributions that default to KDE, the number of awards it has won, how popular it is in online polls, etc.

  60. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, New Here is.
    http://slashdot.org/~New%20Here

  61. a revamped trash system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, it is like the microsoft trash system. Clippy "You seem to want to throw away a document. Would you like me to do it for you."

  62. So, when will this make it by VolciMaster · · Score: 1
    into the mainstream distros? I run several right now, Mandrake, Suse, Slackware, and look forward to it showing up in all of them.

    1. Re:So, when will this make it by Klivian · · Score: 1

      Suse packages are alredy avalible.

  63. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

    It is vital so we don't miss any episode of Tsukuyomi!!!

    --
    - These characters were randomly selected.
  64. Re:fat as ever? by mrtom852 · · Score: 1

    It's fine on hardware older than four years. I recently built a KDE 3.3 desktop for someone on an old PII 450 and it felt really smooth.

    I was genuinly impressed and wished I could send the state of the hdd back in time when I used the machine for my studies >6 years ago.

  65. Good news by realmolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to say, KDE is starting to get really good. And they seem to be cranking out improvements faster than they did in past years.

    A couple more versions, and they'll probably have caught up to/surpassed what you get with a Mac or XP system. GUI-wise, anyway. Underneath it's already better.

    The only complaint I really have about Linux on the desktop these days is the confusing layout of the filesystem. Which isn't KDE's fault. I hate having programs located in 5 different directories, with their configuration files in yet ANOTHER directory. I'm used to it, and it makes sense in a way. But I'd like to see all non-OS exectuables in their own folder under one "Program Files" folder, along with their configuration files. All the "system" files could go under a "System" folder.

    But that'll never happen. It would break EVERYTHING.

    1. Re:Good news by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I'm used to it, and it makes sense in a way."

      No, it doesn't make sense.

      I am not clueless or Myths and misconceptions about the design of GoboLinux

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
    2. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A couple more versions, and they'll probably have caught up to/surpassed what you get with a Mac or XP system. GUI-wise, anyway. Underneath it's already better."

      What's missing? What can I do with Windows that I can't do with KDE?

      "The only complaint I really have about Linux on the desktop these days is the confusing layout of the filesystem. Which isn't KDE's fault. I hate having programs located in 5 different directories,"
      1. My programs are located in /usr/bin, that's not really confusing, is it. Ok, I'll admit, some are located in /usr/sbin, let's try hard to guess why that might be the case.
      2. Who cares about the filesystem layout, I usually click on the menu entry to start the program I want if it is a gui program and in the shell I just type its name, so what is the big deal about the filesystem layout?

    3. Re:Good news by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      XP has
      a) programs under "Program Files"
      b) libraries under "c:\windows32\system32"
      c) config files under "Program Files" or "c:\windows32"

      Windows XP can get very, very messy, too.

      What makes Linux better is often they store config files as .application.config in your personal directory, meaning each user usually has their own configs for user-accessible programs. It's less "efficient" due to more clutter but more "efficient" due to increased customizability and less risk of one person screwing up the settings for the whole system.

      I for one take reliability such as this, over convenience.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    4. Re:Good news by pebs · · Score: 1

      But I'd like to see all non-OS exectuables in their own folder under one "Program Files" folder, along with their configuration files.

      That's fine just don't include any white-space in such often-used folders like "Program Files"! "ProgramFiles" or "Applications" or whatever, just no white space!!!

      --
      #!/
    5. Re:Good news by saigon_from_europe · · Score: 1, Interesting
      The only complaint I really have about Linux on the desktop these days is the confusing layout of the filesystem. Which isn't KDE's fault. I hate having programs located in 5 different directories, with their configuration files in yet ANOTHER directory. I'm used to it, and it makes sense in a way. But I'd like to see all non-OS exectuables in their own folder under one "Program Files" folder, along with their configuration files. All the "system" files could go under a "System" folder.
      I agree that filesystem could be much better organized. But just like with every long-lasting project you have to inherit a lot of bad choices you made. In this particular case, this is inheritance from UNIX. What's worse, no Unix system actually depends on any filesystem organization; kernel would be perfectly happy with "Program Files", "Settings", "Libraries" etc, but programs would find themselves quite confused.

      What's even worse, all Linux filesystems have symlinks, so I really don't know why usr/bin is not linked to /bin (and same for other respective dirs, you get the idea). Those /usr vs non-/usr installs drove me mad (and very often still do) during lib over-installation (if you intall programs, they run anyway, but you never know what lib is really used). It is easy to do, so I don't know why distros don't do that. With some minor hack, these links could be even hidden.

      OS X is UNIX-based kernel, but it does not have too messy filesystem organisation, but they did it in moment when it was obvious they would break backward compatibility.

      Slightly OT, I think that init system should be simplified too, but I really don't have an idea how.
      --
      No sig today.
    6. Re:Good news by flu1d · · Score: 4, Informative

      A couple more versions, and they'll probably have caught up to/surpassed what you get with a Mac or XP system. GUI-wise, anyway. Underneath it's already better.

      Although the beauty of the WM/DE is completely subjective I have found kde-look.org to be a great source of beautifying KDE. If you look through there you can find people that have their desktop looking alot like or exactly like Mac OS X or Windows XP (if you're into that sort of thing).

    7. Re:Good news by beelsebob · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      GUI-wise, anyway. Underneath it's already better. Um, yes... because you get a full featured compositing engine with a normal X/KDE install, don't you... Oh wait... No.

    8. Re:Good news by naelurec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to say, KDE is starting to get really good. And they seem to be cranking out improvements faster than they did in past years.

      I feel the QT/KDE teams has been particularly successful in developing a very extensible foundation. Everything fits nicely together which makes it very developer friendly. As a result, as it continues to gain popularity, development has accelerated.

      Confusing layout of the filesystem

      Thats one thing I particularly like about FreeBSD.. the OS and non-OS files are separated (/usr/bin vs /usr/local/bin and /etc vs /usr/local/etc) and there is a well defined file hierarchy (man hier) which the majority of the ports conform.

      Given the detailed description of what each folder is used for makes it clear as to where you would expect to find certain files. The "Program Files" and "System" folder approach falls short. Sure your able to separate the system files and program files, but beyond that, there is no organizational structure. Things like the path variable are effectively useless and included additional content (help files, clipart, sound files, templates, etc..) get buried and may not be discovered.

      Thats one of the big issues I have with Linux. This hierarchy is left up to the various distributions and many times, a strong, well planned layout is simply not there. I find I regularly spend too much additional time searching for files on Linux due to this (though still not nearly as long as digging through the registry and scouring various files on a Windows box) compared to knowing the hierarchy on FreeBSD and having a high level of confidence that a file i am looking for will be in one or two possible places.

    9. Re:Good news by rainman_bc · · Score: 0

      What makes Linux better is often they store config files as .application.config in your personal directory, meaning each user usually has their own configs for user-accessible programs. It's less "efficient" due to more clutter but more "efficient" due to increased customizability and less risk of one person screwing up the settings for the whole system.

      I call bullshit. Windows has "Documents and Settings"\\Application Settings\*

      That's where Firefox stores its user information.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Good news by 0racle · · Score: 4, Informative

      programs would find themselves quite confused
      ./configure --prefix=/Applications --sysconfigdir=/Settings --libdir=/Librarys

      so I really don't know why usr/bin is not linked to /bin (and same for other respective dirs, you get the idea)
      Because the binaries they hold serve different purposes. Often the stuff in /bin is statically linked so that it is usable in the event of a catastrophic failure, where as /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin binaries are often only usable if the system comes up.

      you never know what lib is really used
      ldd `somebinary`

      OS X is UNIX-based kernel
      Mach kernel

      it does not have too messy filesystem organisation
      With some work your linux could have the same layout

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    11. Re:Good news by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      Thats one of the big issues I have with Linux. This hierarchy is left up to the various distributions and many times, a strong, well planned layout is simply not there.
      http://www.pathname.com/fhs/

    12. Re:Good news by e_xworm · · Score: 1

      >OS X is UNIX-based kernel, but it does not have too messy
      >filesystem organisation, but they did it in moment when it was
      >obvious they would break backward compatibility.

      As I recall OS X has it's own model (Where there are things like /System/Libraries /System/Kernel and so on) and on top of that there is an old school Unix hierarchy with symlinks to the appropriate dirs
      (/usr/lib -> /System/Libraries)
      Am I mistaken?

      --
      X~
    13. Re:Good news by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      There is a good reason to have both /bin and /usr/bin, if you're smart enough to have /usr mounted separately.

      As for OS X - it does actually have all the FHS directories, so that *NIX software feels happy. You just don't see it in Finder.

    14. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that very few windows programs use these conventions. Applications will install little configuration settings all over the damn place.

      Windows could be a nice multi-user environment if people wrote applications that didn't require you to be the administrator all the time and actually stored individual configuration information for each user.

    15. Re:Good news by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

      if you want an XP look/feel check out http://www.xpde.com (if you use Gentoo it is in portage). It has some obvious bugs, but hey, it is still not version 1 yet.

      --
      ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
    16. Re:Good news by Script_God · · Score: 1

      Because the binaries they hold serve different purposes. Often the stuff in /bin is statically linked so that it is usable in the event of a catastrophic failure, where as /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin binaries are often only usable if the system comes up. Not so. /bin is dynamically linked binaries that should be available if /usr/bin can't be mounted. /sbin isn't superuser bin, it's static bin. Same for /usr/sbin.

    17. Re:Good news by daft_one · · Score: 1

      What, are you missing your "\" key?

    18. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solution: Make symlinks to all the directories.

      You can use 'locate kde'
      to find most kde-files..

      I would rather KDE adhere to Linux standards or the various distros, than KDE having its own scheme of things.

    19. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there doesn't seem to be a real problem in linking /usr/bin to /bin. Solaris 9 does this, IIRC Solaris 8 too.

    20. Re:Good news by m50d · · Score: 1

      That's because of centralised control. You'll find that Debian is laid out as well as FreeBSD, because they have very strict packaging guidelines and a policy on these things. But you lose some of the flexibility. As a gentoo user I have packages all over the place, but that's mostly because I put them there, and because the system for adding new stuff is more open.

      --
      I am trolling
    21. Re:Good news by ookaze · · Score: 1

      Your programs would still be confused, as they would put their binaries in /Applications/bin or /Applications/sbin.
      I do not even want to start thinking about the nightmare that would become the PATH variable.
      The truth is that it is a nightmare to manage, and the "Internationalization" piece of the "I'm not clueless" article on GoboLinux site is self contradicting.

      OSS is about choice anyway, so every people have rights to be masochist about software.

    22. Re:Good news by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      ok, I'll revise that...

      c) majority of config files under "Documents and Settings"\Application Settings\*
      d) other config files under "Program Files" or "c:\windows32"
      e) more config bs in the system/user registry (any one program has a chance of blasting your whole system or userspace to smithereens)

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    23. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "daft one" is right

  66. Ever heard of blind people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, there are a lot of disabled people out there, and providing technology for them is great and doesn't have anything to do with clippy.

    Oh, and by disabled I don't me intellectually challenged people like you, because all the computing power in the world available today wouldn't be enough to help you.

    1. Re:Ever heard of blind people? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      It was nothing but a harmless joke about Clippy. There wasn't even an opinion expressed about the technology other than a possible (and funny) application of it. The most annoying thing ever would be if MS Clippy could READ it's suggestions to you while you're trying to get work done. I think one-upping MS with such an innovation would be worthwhile. And yes, the latter half of this post was a harmless joke about Clippy. This is /. where Clippy jokes run rampant in the streets.

    2. Re:Ever heard of blind people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you are such a tool.

  67. Re:fat as ever? by FudRucker · · Score: 4, Informative

    just install the essentials, leave out kde-multimedia, kde-network, kde-graphics, kde-utilities, kde-admin, koffice... KDE is modular, i can get a workable KDE desktop with just arts, kde-base,kde-libs, kde-artwork, & QT... if you already have mozilla/firefox & thunderbird, OpenOffice, then why install redundant apps, KDE is nice but too many people forget it is modular and can be made leaner, but if you want the whole kitchen sink slam all the packages in

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  68. Re:fat as ever? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    I didn't mean that as a limit to its usefulness. I just meant that anything newer is pretty much guaranteed to run KDE well, although older hardware may be perfectly fine.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  69. Re:BSD? Huh? by EduardoFonseca · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    KDE is dying. So...

  70. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you could make it change icon every five minutes or so, between Linux and BSD?
    It would not only give fair coverage to both, but also create some amusing flame wars.

  71. Re:Yahoo :) by bigjocker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sadly, about a month ago I gave up on KDE and Gnome and went back to Enlightenment. I have over 1GB RAM, but those desktops are becoming a huge memory hog.

    E just sits there (looking beautiful, BTW) and does just what I need. A few tweaks away and I have a great desktop.

    --
    Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
  72. Latest News!!! by mightymac · · Score: 1

    This just in...Dinasours cease to walk the earth!

  73. Re:fat as ever? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    The movement should really have kick ass support for hardware up to a decade old.

    According to one timeline, that would mean a 120MHz Pentium. If you honestly think modern authors should limit the functionality of their software to ensure it runs well on a barely-three-digit-MHz 586, then you're insane and I have a RedHat 4 CD that may interest you.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  74. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same people who need kstars: an fine interactive astronomical Software :)

  75. Watch out, not KDE 3.4-final screenshots by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 4, Informative

    The screenshot gallery linked by the parent comment features KDE 3.4 Release Candidate, not the final version.

    (Yes, I realize it's probably very similar, but I went through a few screens thinking "well, seems like it hasn't changed a bit from the RC I'm running here" until I noticed the gallery title.)

    1. Re:Watch out, not KDE 3.4-final screenshots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been no visual changes between the release candidate and the final version: that's why it's called release candidate.

  76. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    power user
    windows 98

    lol.

  77. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Khoice.

  78. Re:Yahoo :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Sadly, about a month ago I gave up on KDE and Gnome and went back to Enlightenment. I have over 1GB RAM, but those desktops are becoming a huge memory hog.>>

    I have no clue how I manage Gnome 2.8 so easily with 512mb of RAM on a PIII Thinkpad with OOffice.org, Thunderbird and Firefox all going. Gosh. Must be magic pixie dust.

    Oh wait! I actually know that Linux maximizes the utilization of all memory on the system to improve performance and having "free memory" makes as much sense as owning a house and keeping three rooms empty.

  79. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    timothy, can you please update the KDE logo to our new one? It looks much better and slashdot should reflect kde's preferred logo. thanks.

  80. Re:BSD? Huh? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

    I left eyeball exploded when I saw it. How could you do it, Timmeh?

  81. Re:Konqueror by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Does Konqueror still have those horrible menus that expand horizontally rather than scroll vertically like they should?

  82. My favorite feature : dnssd (aka zeroconf) by HulkProtector1 · · Score: 1

    I am just waiting until debian (unstable) upgrades to this release so i can check out the zeroconf support. If it does what is promised (easy networking) then I will be ONE HAPPY CAMPER!

    And also the new media ioslave (with hal support) is good too!

    -Sam

    ________________________________________________ _

    I really need to take the time to set this sig, I deserve karma like anyone else...

    1. Re:My favorite feature : dnssd (aka zeroconf) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It could be quite a wait for it to be uploaded to unstable. However, the Debian KDE team already has some quality packages available:

      http://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/docs/install.html

  83. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe, but it's not as fat as yo mamma!

  84. Gnome need to catch up by espergreen · · Score: 2, Funny

    KDE is already at 3.4, but Gnome is only at 2.1!

    1. Re:Gnome need to catch up by bkubi · · Score: 1

      if(2.1!=2.10) { std::cout"Welcome to GNOME"std::endl; } else { KDE++; }

  85. Re:Yahoo :) by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I've only got 256mb of ram on my laptop and kde 3.3 is perfectly usable.

    Gets a little sluggish if i fire up eclipse, but it's still usable.

  86. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all coders, just enough to liberate people stranded on win95&98
    machines. Waiting for those machines to decay is a poor strategy.

  87. Ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe you mean "konventions" ;-)

    Still, it does have the benefit of being able to immediately peg a software package as needing the KDE environment.

    1. Re:Ahem by m50d · · Score: 1

      True, but when it results in something that sounds this bad I think it's time to skip the convention.

      --
      I am trolling
  88. Netcraft confirms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stephen King's naked and petrified KDE is dying.

    I have poured hot grits down my pants. Thank you.

  89. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Piquan · · Score: 1

    It's also useful for predicting software completion target dates. Am I the only one that read the pom manpage?

  90. Re:BSD? Huh? by DataPath · · Score: 1

    Honest mistake, that's how.

    And - I just noticed this - my ID is lower than timothy's

    --
    Inconceivable!
  91. Re:BSD? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And - I just noticed this - my ID is lower than timothy's

    Wow, that's cool. Will you be my friend?

  92. Text??! That's crazy talk! by justins · · Score: 1
    "include built in Text to Speech"

    With that feature, maybe I could read the interview, rather than (not) listening to it at work...
    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  93. What is the quickest way to install? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    ... on Mandrake 10.1?
    I suppose "urpmi kde 3.4" would be too much to hope for?

    1. Re:What is the quickest way to install? by bach37 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It will probably be in the cooker soon. Just add a cooker mirror to your urpmi sources, then you can "urpmi kdebase," or something similar to get it. But beware: the cooker is not guaranteed to be stable by any means. If you are itchin' to dive in, Fedora goes for the more cutting edge releases than Mandrake. Mandrake aims more for stability than current releases (as you can tell by their 'outdated' Firefox, Gaim, and other apps on their mirrors).

    2. Re:What is the quickest way to install? by general_boy · · Score: 3, Informative

      This guy ("Thac") has it built already. Here are his Mandrake 10.1 RPMs:

      http://rpm.nyvalls.se/10.1/RPMS/kde-3.4.0/

  94. KDE's getting to be as cool as Amiga OS... by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    KDE's getting to be as cool as Amiga OS...built-in speech...yeah.

  95. Suse 9.3 is coming out in a few weeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They said it would be middle of April. You can pre-order it on the Novell website. I already ordered mine. Suse 9.2 is already a great desktop distro. 9.3 should be even better, with the new KDE and OpenOffice 2.

    1. Re:Suse 9.3 is coming out in a few weeks by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      My only problem with SuSE 9.2 was that it dosen't have 3D Acceleration Support for Radeon 9800's... it has it for 9000's, 9200's, X300's, X600's, X700's, and X800's but not 9800's!! So I took the 9000 out of my windows machine and put it in my SuSE machine, and put the 9800 in my Windows machine! yaay.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  96. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pagans....

  97. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by aav · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a good contraception method! Not as good as Slashdot, though, as anyone could verify. Still, in some places in this world dial-up lines are expensive, so one doesn't always have access to the very best...

  98. Re:BSD? Huh? by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

    (psst...KDE runs fine on BSD...it's not linux-specific)

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  99. Obligatory Debian crack by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Last week I just upgraded to kde 3.3 because i figured it has allthe buggs worked out. Oh well i wait a few months and get 3.4, only to have 3.5 come out a week later

    You're just lucky you're not running Debian STABLE, I think they just got KDE-1.2.

  100. A year?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I try to be an optimist too, but come on, let's get real here.

  101. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    KDE 3.2 (with eyecandy turned off) ran as well at windows 98 on my girlfriends pentium-MMX 233 in slackware.

    There goes your credibility.

  102. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by superdude72 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Moon Phase Display?!?!?!?! Who in the hell needs a dynamic MOON PHASE display???

    I'm a werewolf, you insensitive clod!

  103. KDE & GNOME: good/bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how come I only hear good news about KDE and only bad news about GNOME?

    whenever GNOME comes up, everybody is bitching about something.

    whenever KDE comes up everybody applauds.

    Is there any bias or prefference?

    1. Re:KDE & GNOME: good/bad news by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      You read the wrong site. Try OSNews.com for the opposite experience ;)

    2. Re:KDE & GNOME: good/bad news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bias is towards quality software. But I'll bitch about KDE 3.4 just for you. I really don't like the new K icon. Putting icons inside of square boxes looks dumb, especially on any sort of icon bar.

  104. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by northcat · · Score: 1

    It's for gentoo users to keep track of how long it takes to compile.

  105. Re:BSD? Huh? by DataPath · · Score: 1

    no, but if there's enough interest, I'll ebay my slash id

    --
    Inconceivable!
  106. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by temojen · · Score: 1

    Amateur astronomers and photographers who work at night, among others.

  107. Now watch the bug reports roll in. by Kili · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm on the kmail list and in the past 12 hours over 57 bugs have been filed against kmail alone...

    I think I'll do what I usually do... wait for x.1 to be released. If that comes out too quickly I wait for x.2.

    As always: Back up your data BEFORE trying new software.

    Happy compiling...

    1. Re:Now watch the bug reports roll in. by CaptainPinko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This just really shows that people need to start using KDE 3.4 *NOW*, even an hour a day of when you are just casually browsing the web to find bugs and send. By all means keep 3.3.2 as your main desktop but run 3.4 and help iron it out. If more people wait till 3.4.1 and 3.4.2 before switching then bugs will take even loinger to find. So don't fight it, accept and run both.

      --
      Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  108. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i need it for monitoring my GF's period. And yes, i am a geek.

  109. Typical Reaction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    foaming at the mouth...

  110. KPDF is GREEEAT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been using 3.4 since RC1 days and KPDF absolutely rocks. This is the best PDF reader for Linux including Acrobat reader.

  111. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    Who in the hell needs a dynamic MOON PHASE display???

    Guys who never get outdoors because they spend all their time watching KDE compile.....

  112. Re:BSD by ulib · · Score: 1

    >Call me ignorant, but what does KDE have to do with BSD?
    No can do. I hate to call people names.
    http://freebsd.kde.org/
    --
    Being able to read *other people's* source code is a nice thing, not a 'fundamental freedom'.

  113. Alert: Mods on crack! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
    KDE's developers have been running some complex global warming simulators [...]

    ...gets "Informative"? WTF?!? Funny, sure, but (hopefully) not informative.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:Alert: Mods on crack! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      It's a response to the +0 Funny/-1 Offtopic situation. Lots more moderators seem to be modding funny stuff interesting or insightful so the person doesn't lose a bunch of karma for being moderated back down to 2 by those with no sense of humour.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  114. Re:BSD? Huh? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    Ignorant.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  115. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by uradu · · Score: 1

    OP: well, there's your answer. This guy needs it.

  116. Re:Yahoo :) by normal_guy · · Score: 1

    Which Enlightenment version do you recommend, and any personal skin favorites? I'm coming from KDE 3.2 and the load time and general performance is a little sluggish.

    --

    Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  117. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget the pagans!

  118. Re:Klauncher could not be reached via dcop by nietsch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " kde needs to fix this problem, not a workaround. Not for me because I don't care anymore. For others, especially newbies."

    Yes and the catholics need to love the protestants, and the linux need to fix their installion scripts.

    If you cannot even mention the distro/version you were running and how you got kde on it, why should anybody take you serious. You are just trying to get people to get angry at you for being hardheaded.

    And I will bite your head off.

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  119. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an interesting myth based on moon-phases. It's one that states people go a little nutty during a full moon. I've heard stories from hospitals, libraries, and other public places where there's a higher amount of "strange behavior" during full moons.

    It's exactly that, a myth. Actual police and hospital statistics don't bear it out.

  120. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New here has been around for a while, at least since last September, and with many posts. I'd say he/she's not all that new here. What a misnomer.

  121. Re:fat as ever? by mrtom852 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I suppose a lot of the perfomance was due to having a good Voodoo3 card so as far as a guarantee you're right. I'll have to upgrade that box now as 3.4 seems to be quicker again!

  122. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

    Adding to that: There are good times and there are bad times for
    human sacrifice. Some people need to know.

  123. Re:Konqueror by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    is this a joke?

    scrolling menus are the most horrible invention I've come across. Horizontally expanding ones are faster, and assuming the contents have not changed, the item you want is always in the same place.

    scrolling menus should die.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  124. Re:Yahoo :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE running with allmost all stuff and it eats 75mb it finish loadin, i don't see how this is a memory hog ...
    Runing Gentoo.

  125. Live CD? by DJDutcher · · Score: 1

    I'm a linux newbie, so I was wondering if there was a live CD like there was for Gnome 2.10? I haven't used KDE before, so I'd like to see what its like without changing too much on my box.

    1. Re:Live CD? by stanthegoomba · · Score: 1

      Yes there is, and you can get it here. Klax is based off of a release candidate from a few weeks ago, but it is almost functionally identical to the final release.

    2. Re:Live CD? by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      www.knoppix.org is all you need to know.

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  126. Re:Yahoo :) by sirTifiable · · Score: 1

    I got an old 866mhz with 512 ram running mandrake 10.1 and kde 3.3 running like lightnening... are you sure that ram is plugged in ;)

  127. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Master+Bait · · Score: 2, Funny
    Who in the hell needs a dynamic MOON PHASE display???
    So you can tell at a glance how close your wife is to PMS time.
    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
  128. Bug hits... heh by mp3phish · · Score: 2, Funny

    " KDE 3.4 weights in at 6,500+ bug fixes, 1,700+ enhancements, and a grand total of 80,000+ contributions."

    Well that to me means they fixed 6,500 bugs but added 1,700 new bugs, plus the potential for 80,000 more new bugs! Hope they aren't working backwards hehehe ;)

    --
    Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    1. Re:Bug hits... heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking of the most appropriate reply to your comment. Then I saw your sig

      "Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize."

      That is it!

  129. Re:Yahoo :) by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Well i'm running at 700mhz and unfortuantely my ram is maxed at 256 :(

    The CPU is holding up fine, it's the ram and paging that kills me when i have eclipse running.

  130. Re:Yahoo :) by 0racle · · Score: 1

    Dual p2, 768MB ram, 2 vmware sessions numorous konsoles, editors 10+ konqueror tabs and kmail all running, no slowdown. 1GB ram doesnt do much if you just have a 386.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  131. less is more by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1, Troll

    Don't leave it in because less is more. Xfoil is very useful to aerodynamicists wanting quick, basic evaluations of airfoil performance. Do we include it in KDE too? No, because 99% of KDE users don't need it and it would only clutter an already huge menu. Look at OS X. Everything is minimalist; there are no unnecessary buttons, boxes or menus. That's because Apple actually focuses on satisfying 95% of their consumers 99% as well as possible, while KDE attempts to satisfy 100% maybe 70% as well. KDE developers and everyone else want to stick in everything and the kitchen sink, Apple just wants to make something that's simple and that works, which is why OS X kicks the shit out of everything else GUI-wise.

    People needing anything esoteric or technical can fetch what they need on their own, because they're not idiots. Astronomers would install their own moon-phase tracking software, because they're astronomers and know how to go about doing that. Scientists routinely customize their software for their specific needs, throwing in a random handful of "maybe-useful" apps into KDE does nothing to alleviate that. All it does is make KDE look more bloated than everything else, especially to all the people who don't need to track moon phases.

    Linux, open source and almost everything in America is defined by one theme: little things should disproportiately influence big things to satisfy everyone. If people realized the fallibility of this, then all GUI and technical communication design would vastly improve. Alas though, everyone wants to embrace complexity because it's "cool," and is stuck in missing the forest for the trees.

    1. Re:less is more by dynamol · · Score: 1

      hum...guess I have to agree with that.

    2. Re:less is more by Carewolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please please please don't install all KDE modules!

      Now it has been said.

      The kdetoys modules is designed to contain useless crap that makes people go: HUH? What the hell is that? Other examples from that modules is a tea clock and rolling head. So if you don't want useless crap don't install kdetoys!

      Other modules to avoid is kde-i18n (do you really want KDE in Swahili and Welsh?) and kdeaddons (stuff no one wanted responsibility for)

    3. Re:less is more by Klivian · · Score: 1

      Exactly, you are so right. Sometimes it looks like people installs everything there is, just to be able to complain about it afterwards. And it's even easier now, since all the modern distributions split up the KDE packages more finegrained. People, with a decent distro you don't have to install KEdit, if you don't want it. Get it!

    4. Re:less is more by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Erm. If you don't want these kde 'toys', don't install the kdetoys package.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    5. Re:less is more by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      AAarrrrgh. I actually used the tea timer when writing my thesis to time the tea brewing time, you insensitive clod!!!!

      I never thought it would be useful, but it's useful for... well... timing tea.

    6. Re:less is more by bcmm · · Score: 1
      Other modules to avoid is kde-i18n
      I'm British, you insensitive clod!
      I need Colours on my Appearance & Themes menu!
      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  132. Re:Konqueror by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I vehemently disagree, as does most of the computer using community, since most menus (quite sanely) scroll vertically. Horizontally-expanding menus completely usurp the user's desktop, and that is always a bad interface implementation. If I want to keep the menu to a single column, I am forced to keep a very limited number entries- the choice is not mine anymore, but is made by virtue of the implementation.

  133. KDE and FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm awaiting for KDE 3.4.
    KDE + FreeBSD is a great combination :)

  134. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need? Well, since you asked, I always have the moon phase applet running. I'm interested recently in astronomical cycles, and related programs. So I guess I don't really need a moon phase applet, but I use it and am glad that someone took the time to make it. Oh and BTW:

    /*
    *
    * The International Obfuscated C Code Contest
    * Here's an example (natori), from the Year 2000 winners [ioccc.org]
    * It supposedly generates a picture of the moon in it's current phase.
    *
    * compile using gcc file.c -lm
    *
    */
    #include
    #include
    double l;main(_,o,O){return putchar((_--+22&&_+44&&main(_,-43,_),_&&o)?(main(- 43,++o,O),((l=(o+21)/sqrt(3-O*22-O*O),l*l<4&&(fabs (((time(0)-607728)%2551443)/405859.-4.7+acos(l/2)) <1.57))[" #"])):10);}

  135. And I just spent 5 days compiling 3.3.2 damnit!!! by UnseenEnigma · · Score: 1

    Took 5 days with my messed up firewall. 64 mb of ram and 2 ghz processor. I dont compile well

  136. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never been able to qualify 'arts' or minimal or usable -- it has been a wart on KDE since day one. A means to bypass or replace it with something more on the CPU-light side (tastes the same, but sucks less) would be a great feature for 3.5.

  137. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I'm tired and screwed it up... try again:

    /*
    *
    * The International Obfuscated C Code Contest
    * Here's an example (natori), from the Year 2000 winners [ioccc.org]
    * It supposedly generates a picture of the moon in it's current phase.
    *
    * compile using gcc file.c -lm
    *
    */
    #include <stdio.h>
    #include <math.h>
    double l;main(_,o,O){return putchar((_--+22&&_+44&&main(_,-43,_),_&&o)?(main(- 43,++o,O),((l=(o+21)/sqrt(3-O*22-O*O),l*l<4&&(fabs (((time(0)-607728)%2551443)/405859.-4.7+acos(l/2)) <1.57))[" #"])):10);}

    How's that for geekiness? I can royally mess up any attempt at humor... oh well

  138. No; you really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE/Ubuntu

    It does a better job of keeping things straight. :P

  139. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "if you already have mozilla/firefox & thunderbird, OpenOffice, then why install redundant apps"

    Or the other way, get rid of mozilla/firefox, OO, evolution, etc etc and use the KDE apps. I prefer Konqueror/Kmail, etc more. Matter of preference and comfort I guess... But you're right. I just prefer it the other way around. Although I like to keep firefox, the plugins like adblocker are awesome.

  140. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you kidding? It goes PERFECTLY with the "fuzzy" clock settings. Oh, sorry, according to my clock it's "evening". Time for me to go...

  141. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by RobertLTux · · Score: 2, Funny

    lets see 1 stargazers 2 wiccen/druids 3 wherewolves 4 The BOFH (and any other OFH type) 5 some nutjobs 6 most nocturnal folks 7 anybody that does stuff near the ocean shall i go on??

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  142. You mean... by Shazow · · Score: 1

    ... Obligatory kliches. :D

    - shazow

  143. Clippy [fall down...Go Boom!] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd be much more impressed with Linux if I could do either one seamlessly, and get some work done.

    1-Disconnect the Mouse.

    2-Disconnect the keyboard.

    As for the inevitable "why?" Assume the given device has failed.

  144. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do, I use it to regulate my distribution cycles. Also, it's handy for knowing when most of the local females will be menstruating, or for when to plant seeds, etc, etc, etc/.

    some people just don't think!

  145. Re:Konqueror by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    > Horizontally-expanding menus completely usurp the user's desktop, and that is always a bad interface implementation.

    So tell me, what is the user is going to be doing with their desktop whilst they are selecting an item from the menu?

    As a user I would prefer to not be able to see my desktop, but be able to see exactly where the item I want to select is, and be able to do it as quickly as possible, rather than still be able to see my desktop, but unable to see the item I want to choose from the menu and then have to waste time scrolling through a list to find what I want.

    Scrolling menus are absolutely horrible to deal with, particularly if you are unfortunate enough to want to select an item that is not among the selections available when the menu opens.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  146. Re:Klauncher could not be reached via dcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is the error you're talking about:

    An error occurred while loading about:blank:

    Could not start process Cannot talk to klauncher.

    I've been getting it once in a while also, but not to the point of being annoying. Just restart X. I'm on a Debian testing system. The only thing I found on it seems to be on an older kde release of a year or two ago. Hopefully this latest release of kde has enough changes and bug fixes in it that the problem is gone even if there are no bug reports on the problem.

    While frustrated, you might get a better response if you post a little better, there appear to be enough kde developers with slashdot accounts and mod points to spare to mod down any criticism at all as appears to be happening in other posts that have criticism in them as well. Sometimes criticism is a good thing. If there weren't any criticism there wouldn't be any fixes.

  147. Parent is politically incorrect. by istewart · · Score: 1

    Sir, your post demonstrates a highly regrettable cultural intolerance towards werewolves.

    I suggest that you educate yourself about our lupine brothers and sisters.

  148. Re:Klauncher could not be reached via dcop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day when I ran KDE this happened all the time to me. All I had to do was wipe some temp files and it solved the problem for a while.

    Basically it's a bug in aRTs. aRTs sucks. No offenese to any developer, but aRTs was the bane of my KDE usage.

    If you're using a source-based distribution you can compile Gentoo without aRTs support. As a Gentoo user, all I had to do was go in /etc/make.conf and specify -arts in my USE flags. Alsa is a wonderful system that works great.

    For the record, I was using an nForce2 onboard soundcard. And yes, it is fully supported in the Linux kernel 2.6. I don't hear about people getting this problem a lot, so it could be a hardware problem.

    The solution for me was to delete temporary files, as stated already. This is a good practice anyway.

    "sudo rm -r /tmp/*" safely removes temporary files that aren't essential to your system. It fixed my problems.

    As to the original flamebait complaining about KDE development in general -- file a fucking bug report, dick.

  149. Re:Konqueror by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    ...since most menus (quite sanely) scroll vertically.

    Since when? Please define "most"...

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  150. Re:Konqueror by symbolic · · Score: 1


    I'm not sure what you're looking at, but almost every menu *I've* seen or used, is vertical scroll. I'm not a computer neophyte- I've have Apple, Linux, and Windows. I can assure you that the horizontally-expanding menus are not common. At least that's one thing where common sense has prevailed.

  151. Re:Konqueror by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    I don't have it in Qt, I don't have it in GTK+, I don't have it in Motif. Maybe I just don't have any menus large enough to scroll...

    I have seen this in Windows, and I hated it. Of course, I'm not an newbie, so what do I know?

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  152. Re:Konqueror by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Well, more specifically, I was referring to Konqueror's Bookmarks menu. Of all menus to use that kind of implementation...it's really quite nasty. The only place I've seen it in Windows is the Start menu, though there might be others.

  153. Re:Konqueror by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    scrolling menus are the most horrible invention I've come across.

    Try having a lot of bookmarks in your webbrowser. With horizontally expanding menus they can expand right off the screen, at which point the menu is completely unusable. Also, the position of the entries does change if the window is moved, and it may not be obvious which column an entry is in.

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
  154. MOD PARENT UP! by rastos1 · · Score: 1

    Sigh. And I lost my moderation points just yesterday.

  155. Feeding the troll... by vdboor · · Score: 1
    I have over 1GB RAM, but those desktops are becoming a huge memory hog.

    So I've installed SuSE 9.2 on a pentium 266 with 160 MB ram and I can still use the machine up to an acceptable level.

    (and it doesn't differ much from the previous windows 98 install)

    --
    The best way to accelerate a windows server is by 9.81 m/s2 ;-)
  156. Re:Konqueror by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    why would you have that many uncategorized bookmarks?
    That's like blaming the designer of a desk that your papers fall off the sides when you overload it.

    But you're right, having the menu go off the screen is not good, and it becomes quite a problem to figure out the best way to deal with it.
    But I'm not a believer in making the normal case hard so that the rare case is easy.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  157. You missed a memo by godless+dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The UK is a US protectorate now. Tony Blair is our bitch.

    --
    "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
  158. Yes but, by cm769et · · Score: 0

    does it run Gnome?

  159. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever notice that all the (major) window managers shorten their names to one letter like drugs do?
    K(DE) - Ketamine
    G(NOME) - GHB
    E(nlightenment) - Ecstasy

    Then there's X as well for Ecstasy.

    Stoner Linuxer (ha!): Man this K is working so well!
    Cop: Freeze! Hands in the air!
    S.L.: Chill dude! I'm just bragging about my window manager.
    Cop: I know! KDE sUX0rs! GNOME r0x0rs!

  160. Re:Yahoo :) by bigjocker · · Score: 1

    I'm using 0.16.7.2 (Gentoo) with a few E17 things that really make a great desktop.

    For the other posters, I use VMWare AND Eclipse at the same time, plus Firefox, Thunderbird, Skype and Gaim. The difference is huge in comparation when I used KDE.

    --
    Life isn't like a box of chocolates. It's more like a jar of jalapenos. What you do today, might burn your ass tomorrow.
  161. Re:Klauncher could not be reached via dcop by zipn00b · · Score: 1

    Yeah complaints that have no specifics are just flamebait as they have no intention of finding a resolution. I do recall having dcop problems at one point probably with KDE 3.1 on Redhat 8 or so. Currently running 3.2.something on an out-of-the-box Mandrake 10.0 for like a year or so with no problem.

  162. Re:Good LORD it's got some useless stuff! by jakel2k · · Score: 1

    Werewolves, duh.

  163. Disjoint specs by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Why do you have 64 megs of RAM on a 2 GHz machine? Heck, I'd rather use a box with 256 megs of RAM and a 500 MHz processor. It would be faster.:)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  164. Re:Yahoo :) by ookaze · · Score: 1

    Mmmh
    I have 1 Go RAM and 3 desktops running at the same time : KDE, Gnome and XFCE. And soon a 4th session for my little daughter.
    And I have no resource problem.

    I did have problems though, when I had python apps (like Straw) and Java apps (like Azureus) running on my desktops. these one could eat my Go RAM + 2 Go swap in one day, making the system swap like crazy.
    That's way I'm wary of trying mono apps BTW.

  165. i love kde by sammcj2000 · · Score: 0

    i love kde, execpt one thing, and that is the fact that on almost every computer ive seen it running on, the actual interface feels like its java or something of like: its very small interface lag eventually gets on my nerves. but never the less, id rather run it than say gnome for example (which is fast, but ugly and utterly un-configurable)

  166. Re:fat as ever? by cmbofh · · Score: 1

    Won't happen in 3.5.

    - Would break the binary compatibility guaranteed throughout the KDE 3.x cycle that third-party apps rely on.
    - Too much effort anyway

    KDE 4.0 will kick arts (and ass ;).

  167. Re:fat as ever? by cmbofh · · Score: 1

    I'd say those people should take a look at xfce or http://www.rule-project.org/. There are projects that are optimised for low-power machines.

    But that cannot be the focus of modern desktop development!

  168. Re:fat as ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By 7.3 kumquats.

  169. Re:Troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it seemed like such a good idea at the time!