Slashdot Mirror


State-Sponsored Solitaire?

jefu writes "According to this story the state of North Carolina may be considering banning solitaire on state owned machines. It seems that state workers are now perceived as having replaced leaning on brooms with playing solitaire or minesweeper. The story provides coverage of both sides of the issue, noting that playing solitaire (or other games) may provide workers with a way to burn off some stress, but that this kind of activity is likely to be perceived as time wasting. My favorite bit (especially as April 15th draws ever closer) is where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling."

331 comments

  1. Misses the real problem by bigtallmofo · · Score: 5, Funny

    It sounds to me like the real problem is that government workers aren't able to hit Alt-Tab fast enough. Once we address that, then the problem will be neatly swept under the rug.

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Misses the real problem by mikael · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that they are not running a Linux desktop environment. If they were, they would be able to have multiple desktops open at any one time. One for games and a web browser, and the other for work.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:Misses the real problem by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Funny
      Once we address that, then the problem will be neatly swept under the rug.

      ...unfortunately their brooms are optimised for leaning, not for sweeping.

    3. Re:Misses the real problem by ashmedai · · Score: 1

      I would think the real problem is that their admin doesn't have "Games" "Internet Games" and "Pinball" unchecked in their distribution copy. It's really just that simple. Older versions of Windows don't even make you uncheck three seperate boxes!

    4. Re:Misses the real problem by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Ah, alt-tab. The new-age boss key!

    5. Re:Misses the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, back in the days our games came with "boss keys" that hid the game and made it look like you were using Lotus 1-2-3 (or some spreadsheet program)

      Bringing that back would solve all this right now (other than the DOS based spreadsheet look-alike)

    6. Re:Misses the real problem by toxis · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alt-Tab doesn't work if there's no other window open. ;)

    7. Re:Misses the real problem by Roryking · · Score: 1

      At my school they left out Pinball, but curiously opted to leave in Solitare, Hearts and Minesweeper. Also, using Novell to prevent access to "My Documents," which is a brain-boggler to say the least.

    8. Re:Misses the real problem by Surazal · · Score: 1

      Alt-Tab doesn't work if there's no other window open. ;)

      If that were the case at work, my friend, then you truly are screwed. ;)

      --
      --- Journals are boring; Go to my web page instead
    9. Re:Misses the real problem by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

      Yeah but Windows+M will minimize everything on the screen.=)

    10. Re:Misses the real problem by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      Derr....I can do that in Windows, too.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    11. Re:Misses the real problem by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we're talking about workplace computers, which, assuming the admin is competant, are less likely to allow installing something like that.

      --
    12. Re:Misses the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the Boss? Under the table with Suzie?

    13. Re:Misses the real problem by ksaville00 · · Score: 1

      hahah, I was thinking that. It's all about hiding it

    14. Re:Misses the real problem by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 1

      assuming the admin is competant

      Not sure you can assume that here - given that (s)he can't remove minsweeper from the standard PC install, and doesn't seem capable of implementing web filters to stop online gambling. Our standard Win2K doesn't have Pinball.exe, and the proxies stop me doing much of what I shouldn't online. Just banning it, without implementing such things is a bit of a waste of time, in much the same was as banning leaning on brooms would be if the brooms were still designed to allow "users" to lean on them. Hang on a minute... :-)

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    15. Re:Misses the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's turn this around: Wouldn't you rather lose solitare, than a time-waster you actually care about?

      Sacrifice MS solitare to the God of clueless bigwigs who like to be seen as doing something useful instead of something important.

    16. Re:Misses the real problem by Tassach · · Score: 1
      Even if you have the BOFH, you can more than likely work around it. No games in /usr/bin, and you don't have permission to install any? No problem -- install them in ~/bin instead. If you're really clever you can do something like "mv ~/bin/tuxracer ~/bin/tps_report" as a little misdirection.

      Of course a real BOFH would mount /home with noexec... of course that would make it difficult to do any productive work either, but at least you wouldn't be playing games!

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    17. Re:Misses the real problem by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I just tried it. Opened up solitar played half way through a game and pretended my boss was walking over. SLASHDOT!!! came up. What's worse???

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    18. Re:Misses the real problem by Lord+Kestrel · · Score: 1

      Microprose's F-117 game had a great boss key, not only would it bring up a great looking Lotus screen, it would allow you to type (although it didn't actually do anything), until you hit the boss key again. That way it actually looked like you were doing something, instead of just sitting there staring at a screen.

      Personally, I play a little Nethack at work, which luckily looks enough like a busy console or top output that I can get away with it if someone notices before I can save+exit.

    19. Re:Misses the real problem by isil · · Score: 1

      Rename it 'core' :)
      Any curious admin could tell by the filesize its probably an executable and not a document.

    20. Re:Misses the real problem by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Well, any half wit (l)use would create a shell script in thier directory, then use /bin/bash to execute it. They could create a file called script.sh, that only says "gaim" in it, nothing more, then execute this.


      /bin/sh /home/luser/script.sh

      br> This will run gaim. not sure it it works every time, but it HAS worked for me in the past.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  2. Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What does April 15th have to do with anything?

    1. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Tax returns due in the United States.

    2. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by northcat · · Score: 1

      Yup, everything is about Mac.

    3. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait.

      Not May 15?

      GOD DAMN IT

    4. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when US Income Taxes are due.

      It's a reference to the IRS playing games half the time they're on the Internet.

      The IRS is the organization that collects our taxes, if you're wondering that, too.

    5. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh.. You mean April-Fools-Day????

    6. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SOunds more like a April 1 story to me.

    7. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by wootest · · Score: 1

      Yup, everyone lives in the US or otherwise must be assumed to know about tax day, and it's impossible that people might only recognize the date from the pretty recent rumors about the Tiger release.

    8. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, American-Infidel-Dogs-Getting-Their-Comeuppance-Da y.

    9. Re:Mac OSX Tiger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are reading a US web site. Get over it.

  3. PANIC!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's only a matter of time before they ban Slashdot.

    1. Re:PANIC!!! by SimplePaul · · Score: 5, Funny

      then they would be on the right track to stopping time-wasting ;)

    2. Re:PANIC!!! by QMO · · Score: 1

      At my work slashdot is blocked.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  4. Linux, here we come! by zecg · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and with this regulation fell the last obstacle to Linux acceptance in North Carolina.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Linux, here we come! by mozingod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      KDE/Gnome come with a lot more games by default than Windows.

    2. Re:Linux, here we come! by northcat · · Score: 1

      Sorry if I'm missing the joke but solitaire is available on Linux.

    3. Re:Linux, here we come! by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      But does anyone want to play them?

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    4. Re:Linux, here we come! by arose · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you hear that doing common activities on GNU+Linux requires expensive re-training? They'll just leave 'Solitaire' of the program.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    5. Re:Linux, here we come! by JonXP · · Score: 1, Funny

      But they require three kernel patches, five non-existent drivers, and are all command line interface.

    6. Re:Linux, here we come! by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      The last Linux solitare I played included like 50 variants ... including million-game Freecell with hints. If anything, I can see productivity going down.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:Linux, here we come! by Randy+Wang · · Score: 1

      As if they wouldn't be using xfce :-)

      --
      --- Egads, I glow in the dark!
    8. Re:Linux, here we come! by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      Yep it does! We are using EduLinux with Colibris and xterm and first tests teachers and directors where not happy with the game part.

      --
      No sig for now.
    9. Re:Linux, here we come! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You say this as if it is a bad thing???

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  5. Getting work done... by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I admit it. I have had to delete Gnome Games and Windows Solitaire/Minesweeper/Freecell/Hearts from my machines at work. I just couldn't get any work done before.

    1. Re:Getting work done... by La+Gris · · Score: 1

      I admit it, ... I just couldn't get time to spare @ /. before.

      --
      Léa Gris
    2. Re:Getting work done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now, instead of playing games, you are reading Slashdot?

    3. Re:Getting work done... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just think of how much work you would get done if you could delete Slashdot!

    4. Re:Getting work done... by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      I work at a US Postal facility. The access to users icons for the Games were deleted through a Group Policy in Active Directory about a month ago. I've yet to get any calls asking where the shortcuts went. I haven't gone into Windows to see if the executables are still there.

  6. My workplace by interiot · · Score: 1

    At places I've worked at, Solitare and Minesweeper have never been installed by default. On the other hand, access to Slashdot is still wiiiide open, so there's no need to resort to brooms yet.

    1. Re:My workplace by legojenn · · Score: 1
      Just for the hell of it, I decided to see if it was on my XP implementation by default, and I could not find it off the Start menu. However, if I open up the run box off the start menu, to get Solitaire, I just typed sol and hit return.

      Good going IMD guys!

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  7. Scientific approach by zecg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling

    Would that mean the IRS employs 50% too many workers?

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Scientific approach by The+Grey+Clone · · Score: 1

      No, 100% too many.

      But I don't think that was the point of the article.

    2. Re:Scientific approach by zecg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ach, I was some ten milliseconds too late in realizing that. Slashdot needs a bloody "edit post" function.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    3. Re:Scientific approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean an MBA approach?

    4. Re:Scientific approach by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      Would that mean the IRS employs 50% too many workers?

      Not necessarily: they only mention the time spent at the computer. The minimum number of redundant personnel is zero (no-one spends time at the computer such that no time is lost), the maximum number may as well be much higher than 50%, assuming the non-computer time is even spent worse, e.g. leaning on brooms.

    5. Re:Scientific approach by rzebram · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nope, do you realize how many employees gambling it takes to lose all of the taxpayer money? They get billions in each year, they need to do something with it! Although I guess that whatever money they spend on gambling they get part of back when taxes come due... Damn them, even when they lose they win!

    6. Re:Scientific approach by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Non-computer time is spent taking people's tax payments and burning them so the IRS can tack on fines.

    7. Re:Scientific approach by weighn · · Score: 5, Funny

      OH&S SITE INSPECTOR: So, how many people work here?
      IRS SECTION MANAGER: Oh, about half of them.

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    8. Re:Scientific approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the state computers, but the IRS' computers haven't had solitaire as part of the install for about five years. I'm not sure what IRS study they're talking about, or when it was done. If it's an old study, then I believe it. The average IRS employee who sits in front of a computer would never even know how to access anything. Most of them barely know how to launch IE to look at things they *need* to do their jobs.

      Trust me on this one, OK?

    9. Re:Scientific approach by serutan · · Score: 1

      I read recently that the free tax advice given by IRS employees is right only 50% of the time. Coincidence? [yeah probably]

    10. Re:Scientific approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How and where do you apply?

      Internal Rectal Service sure has a backup.
      They should follow the Australian Govt model, where there is NO internet access, and a reasonable use policy that would see these slackers fired, well before their lack of output was spotted by eagle eyed management, and a workflow tracking system. Even the parking inspectors have quotas downunder.

      Regrettably the .au plum jobs of local counciler/member, railway or road workers are heavilly contested, whilst inheritance 'rights' are needed to become a dockyard or union construction foreman.

    11. Re:Scientific approach by William+Tanksley · · Score: 1

      It means they need to fire the other 50%.

      -Billy

    12. Re:Scientific approach by superyooser · · Score: 1
      fifty percent of the time

      The IRS doesn't have much work to do in the tax off-season.

    13. Re:Scientific approach by frankvl · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why we have to do the work (filling the tax form) ourselves..

    14. Re:Scientific approach by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Q. How long have you been working here?
      A. Ever since they threatened to fire me!

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  8. Solitaire is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    All I can say is that it's a good thing Windows doesn't come with Tetris.

    1. Re:Solitaire is boring by tqft · · Score: 1

      Like this?

      http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/more-info/blockf al l
      "Blockfall is a Tetris-like game,..."

      Obviously not installed by default. But I am sure you can work it out.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    2. Re:Solitaire is boring by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      Tetrinet is better, but then you're playing over the network and that's probably not a smart option at work.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    3. Re:Solitaire is boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 16 years ago, a wonderful gadget was
      introduced to the American public. A delightful
      toy, that would let you play games, including
      TETRIS ANYWHERE you want. Infact, I heard it
      even came with TETRIS as it's pack in! I don't
      remember what it was, but I think the last word
      was "Boy" and the first word was "Game", and there
      were two words in it's name.

  9. How can you 'ban' solitaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume that there are dozens of online solitaire games avaiable. Unless they take the extra step of blocking all game related websites, the whole thing is pointless.

    1. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? by northcat · · Score: 1

      Pointless? Don't you mean unpractical? In fact it's not even unpractical. Most people are not going to do that since it's either too much work or it's too 'technical'.

    2. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the word you are looking for is "impractical."

    3. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      In high school, i had a copy of sol.exe and winmine.exe on my network account. Teachers often asked me how they could get it on their accounts too.

  10. Hah. by hussain · · Score: 0

    I'd love to write a reply to this, but y'know... my solitare window is calling.

  11. As someone who used to work for the state by wmspringer · · Score: 1

    I can honestly say that I only gamble on my own computer :-p

    Now, I did some shopping on my work computer, but that was strictly for business supplies. Well, mostly..

  12. OK... How many of you readers... by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... work there?

    1. Re:OK... How many of you readers... by northcat · · Score: 4, Funny

      None.

      (I hope you understand the joke)

    2. Re:OK... How many of you readers... by jschroering · · Score: 1

      I work for the state of NC. There are those of us that work hard, and there are others that don't work so hard. Yes, I read /. at work, though I consider it somewhat informative (/.? informative? well, go ahead and mod this funny..) as it helps keep me up to speed on different issues and technologies. Now I don't read it all day, but I might take a break and browse it while something else is running in the background or on another machine. The point is, when I work, I bust my ass. There is nothing wrong with taking a break every once in a while, whether it's /. or solitaire.. Jimmy

    3. Re:OK... How many of you readers... by cojsl · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the sponsor of the bill is a paragon of efficient use of his constituents' time? Any long golf outings? Leisurely business lunches?

    4. Re:OK... How many of you readers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "there" you mean "the IRS" then... yep.

      Minesweeper and Solitaire haven't been part of the install for about five years, so it's got to be an old study. Most people who are on computers are on emulators, and they don't have access to much. To be honest, they don't have knowledge of much, and wouldn't know how to get to games if they had instructions. It's still a painfully paper-centric organization, despite the efforts of the few of us within the organization who dwell in the 21st Century.

  13. Minesweeper by sandstorming · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As soon as I worked out the cheat that shows a colour changing pixel in the top corner of the screen I lost all interest in Minesweeper. Most my friends now believe I am psychic because I can 'sense' whether a square has a mine under it or not :)

    1. Re:Minesweeper by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      I lost interest in Minesweeper when I did the smallest custom board size, with the maximum number of mines.

      10 x 10 grid. 99 mines. I fluked it, and the very first game I played, I hit the only free square. Since there would be no way I could ever top that, I didn't. (and no, I didn't have the xyzzy cheat on).

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
    2. Re:Minesweeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By "worked out", you of course mean "read on the internet"...

    3. Re:Minesweeper by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      IIRC, in Windows Minesweeper, the first square you click will always be bomb free. It avoids having people lose on the first click.

      So you didn't challenge yourself at all. If you want a challenge, use 98 mines on a 10x10 grid.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    4. Re:Minesweeper by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmmm. Is that funny or clueless?

      In case you don't know, Minesweeper doesn't lay out the mines until *after* you make your first pick, and won't put a mine where you made that pick, to avoid the "unfairness" of losing on your first move. So a board with only one clear square cannot be lost. You make your pick, Minesweeper puts mines on all the other squares, you win. Every time. Actually, you can't do it any more. On an m by n board, recent editions of Minesweeper won't let you have more than (m-1)*(n-1) bombs. But it's still true that you can't die on your first pick. (Some non-Microsoft Minesweeper clones don't implement this, though)

      Chris Mattern

    5. Re:Minesweeper by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      On the XP version, you're limited to 81 mines on a 10 x 10 grid. If you enter 98 or 99, it doesn't complain, but you get only 81 mines.

    6. Re:Minesweeper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While it's true that you can't lose on your first go, past experience with xyzzy tells me that the board is decided before you make your first click. (presumably if you click on a mine it moves to somewhere else)

      Anyone got the minesweeper source? :)

    7. Re:Minesweeper by arodland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people I know think I'm psychic just because I know how to play minesweeper. They don't get that there's actually a logic to it, so they think I have really good luck.

    8. Re:Minesweeper by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I've lost on the first click many a time.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    9. Re:Minesweeper by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've messed around with it, and I was wrong, you really can't lose on the first click. Either they've changed it or I'm on crack :)

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  14. Job Description.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that what Government workers are supposed to do? ;)

  15. Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see it now: employees sneaking in 52-card decks into the office and playing solitaire on their desk. Boss walks buy, they quickly throw their keyboard on top of it and get back to work. Gotta "burn off stress" somehow.

    I just hope Minesweeper addicts don't resort to planting landmines in the office to get their fix.

    1. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope Minesweeper addicts don't resort to planting landmines in the office to get their fix.

      Are you sure about that? This IS the IRS we're talking about.

    2. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope Minesweeper addicts don't resort to planting landmines in the office to get their fix.

      Don't give Bush ideas!

    3. Re:Brilliant! by damsgaard · · Score: 1

      Visitor: Why do you have landmines on your couch?
      Uncle Duke: Oh, to teach the dogs not to jump on it.
      Visitor: What dogs?

    4. Re:Brilliant! by iNetRunner · · Score: 1
      I just hope Minesweeper addicts don't resort to planting landmines in the office to get their fix.
      No, no.. That is an other branch of the government. ;)

      (They also have Chess and Global Thermonuclear War games installed on their mainframes.)
      --
      Store with salt
  16. Great by ornil · · Score: 4, Funny

    fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling.

    So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling. Whose wise idea was that, I wonder?

    1. Re:Great by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Whose wise idea was that, I wonder?

      An online casino owner...

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got no solitaire on my IRS machine. Never seen a machine in the building with solitaire on it. I think its a BS claim.

    3. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling

      So what, it's not their money!

    4. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling. Whose wise idea was that, I wonder?

      Can they drag-drop your tax dollars? Anonymous Coward -> lucky seventeen!

    5. Re:Great by DemingBuiltMyHotRod · · Score: 1
      So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling. Whose wise idea was that, I wonder?

      Who says Solitare and gambling are mutually exclusive?
      $5 on Red!

    6. Re:Great by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      So, if we ban Solitaire, the IRS employees will probably spend more time gambling.

      So long as you firewall their internet connection so that they can only get to US gambling sites, this is a good way to get some of the money you are paying them back in the form of gambling taxes.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
  17. they think they have it tough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had to delete slashdot off of my computer at work.

    Sorry everybody!

  18. Banning of software/protocols... by Krankheit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slightly OT but... Where I attend they have locked down the Windows machines to the point where you can't do much of anything. Only professors/administrators can use the floppy drive. Mspaint, Solitaire, and Firefox are amoung the banned software (they claim this software is abused). Thankfully, the admin has is using less restriction on my account because he realizes mspaint and firefox can be useful, and not just for abuse circumventing the porn-blocker. I realize there is not likely anything productive to do with Solitaire, but banning of software in general is extremely irritating when you don't have your laptop with you.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    1. Re:Banning of software/protocols... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Only professors/administrators can use the floppy drive

      Isn't that why USB keychain drives were invented?

    2. Re:Banning of software/protocols... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know if locking things down actually forces people to work more efficiently, or whether people just take breaks in other ways. For instance, zoning out in meetings.

  19. I miss DOS games... by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
    ... with the "Boss" Hide Key.

  20. when SE/Linux takes over the wooorld by lkcl · · Score: 1, Troll

    ... this will no longer be a problem.

    lock down the machine: ban games, and any other apps which are not "approved".

    oh, darn. it's a windows-related article. *thinks*... let's start again.

    Subject: when SE/Linux takes over the wooorld...

    this will no longer be a problem...

    1. Re:when SE/Linux takes over the wooorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of a thing called group policy dipshit?

  21. Thats so 90's! by IAMTHEMEDIA · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man I was playing Solitare and Minesweeper back in tha day! Day meaning 1995 or so, but the point is, its time for those of us /.ers to acend and transcend. Theres plenty of flash games on the internet that provides way more fun, not to mention it can be easily concealed by clicking on your toolbar to show your fileing those TPS reports.

    1. Re:Thats so 90's! by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      A boss walks out of his office.

      *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP*
      "Come on you bastard!" *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* "Jump already!" *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP* *KEYTAP*

    2. Re:Thats so 90's! by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I kind of like SSHing into my linux box at home and playing NetHack. I got a couple of other people at work playing it, so we now have a high-score competition going.

    3. Re:Thats so 90's! by maotx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why play Minesweeper or Solitare when you can play a SpyHunter like game?
      In Excel under file menu, do 'Save as Web Page'
      Say 'Publish Sheet' and 'Add Interactivity'
      Save to some htm page on your drive.
      Load the htm page with IE. You should have Excel in the middle of the page.
      Scroll to row 2000, column WC. Select row 2000, and tab so that WC is the active column.
      Hold down Shift+Crtl+Alt nad click the Office logo in the upper-left.
      Use the arrow keys to drive, space to fire, O to drop oil slicks, and when it gets dark, use H for your headlights.

      Requires DirectX and Microsoft Office 2000 SP0.
      If you update Office it will no longer work.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  22. 90% of all statistics are made up on the spot... by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "But research done by the IRS has shown that over 50 percent of the time an IRS employee goes on a computer, he or she also hooks up to the Internet to shop, gamble or play games."

    Anyone else wondering where this "research" was published?

  23. WHERE are YOU reading this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are at work, then you must surely agree that the comment about people wasting fifty percent of their time doing non-productive things is correct - or even low!

    1. Re:WHERE are YOU reading this? by jschroering · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm at home, cooking dinner. But I do read /. at work, though I wouldn't say I slack off 50% of the time. Besides, is it wrong to slack off for four hours in a day if you produce more in the other four hours than people who 'worked' eight hours that day? Note that thats a drastic example, but it's not far from the truth sometimes. And I should know, I'm a state employee. Jimmy

  24. IRS running Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know Linux gaming sucks, so why not take a shot? :)

    Better yet, IRS did you see Mac's D3 benchmarks? I say give it a shot.

  25. 50% is plenty o' time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for them not to notice that 50% of my 1099 forms accidentally fell into the shredder this year.

  26. He he he by cuteseal · · Score: 1

    On my previous project, the scheduler used to play solitaire openly - no alt tabbing or anything. Even when the boss walked past. He used to be the butt of many a joke... Well he was a contractor, and was given the boot pronto. :D

  27. Yep by varmittang · · Score: 1

    And geeks are on Slashdot 50% of the time that they are in front of a computer.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And geeks are on Slashdot 50% of the time that they are in front of a computer.

      I hope there aren't any geeks working at the IRS, because that adds up to 100%.

    2. Re:Yep by agm · · Score: 1

      That's the beauty of multiple monitors. Slashdot on one side and work on the other. The powers that be have no idea which one I am looking at.

  28. but then by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    What terrible new form of loafing will arise to take its place?

    Leaning on brooms could perhaps hurt one person if they fell off their broom. Hanging out by the watercooler could injure half a dozen in a freak watercooler accident. Slashdot slashdots whole websites that companies depend on to get their message out, taking down the original source of information and replacing it with reams of discussion.

    what next? What next!? will someone please think of the children?

  29. huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    will save taxpayers millions in gained productivity

    This is assuming of course that the employees won't find something else to substitute the solitaire game Cell phone Tetris anyone? :) Then again this is the same flawed logic that leads software manufacturers and the RIAA to claim that they are losing billions every year. Assuming that the people downloading the software and music would have bought those things to begin with. Politics as usual I guess.

    1. Re:huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again this is the same flawed logic that leads software manufacturers and the RIAA to claim that they are losing billions every year.

      Or my favorite: the startup time of a PC (couple of minutes) * 100 workers * 250 days a year = 2 man years of waste every year! Think of the savings! Oh wait, you mean people check their calendars, go get some coffee, etc during those 2 minutes?

  30. Slackers Are a Management Problem by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Leaving aside the snobbery and bigotry of that "leaning on brooms" comment, this proposal is seeing some discussion here in North Carolina. Most that I've heard and read correctly points to this as a management issue, not something that merits legislation.

    That is, if an employee is not meeting expectations because he is spending too much time trolling the net, that's his fault, not the Internet's. The same problem would exist if he spent too much time doing crossword puzzles are talking to his girlfriend on the phone. The core problem is the employee not meeting expectations, not what he's doing to divert his attention.

    As for Solitaire, don't install it, OK? And if a manager thinks someone is spending too much time playing online games or whatever, ask the IT guys to verify it and then do a bit of "counseling".

    Now, if this guy really wanted to enhance productivity, he'd propose outlawing watching NCAA basketball playoffs at work. Heh. :-)

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by mccalli · · Score: 5, Insightful
      That is, if an employee is not meeting expectations because he is spending too much time trolling the net, that's his fault, not the Internet's. The same problem would exist if he spent too much time doing crossword puzzles are talking to his girlfriend on the phone. The core problem is the employee not meeting expectations, not what he's doing to divert his attention.

      Agreed, but I'd like to introduce a slight cautionary note. For some jobs I simply disbelieve that it is possible to be productive 100% of the day for 100% of all working days. I always love these productivity studies which say "600,000 man days of work are lost to <daft activity x> every year, employers say <daft activity x> must be banned from the workplace to ensure productivity rises."

      Which, of course, it doesn't because 600,000 man days of work are now being 'lost' by the employees switching to <daft activity y> instead. That 600,000 days was an illusion - the productivity was never there to be had, in some jobs it's impossible for people to work as if they were machines. I including programming in this by the way.

      I don't play games at work, but I certainly browse the web and spend some time talking to my wife over SMS messages. In days when desktop internet access wasn't common, I'd do crosswords at lunchtime or go for coffee breaks. Granted some of the figures mentioned sound extreme, but still - 100% of everybody's time isn't always a realistic target.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've been saying this to no avail for years now. I wish someone would start listening.

      I get so frustrated at management trying to pass off their responsibilites to the IT folks at companies. Simple example: Internet content filtering. I work at a large (Fortune 100) company, and I handle second-level support calls. One common theme that generates hundreds of calls a month (it is multinational) is, "I need access to such-and-such a site for legitimate business purposes, but it says that it's blocked due to (whatever reason the content filtering company had classified it)." So we have to get on a directly-connected machine, check out the site, verify that the person actually needs access, get approval from the person's manager, put in a request with the guy who manages the content filter, wait a few days until he can get around to it, then call the person back and let them know that the site has been allowed.

      That's an awful lot of work to keep the very few people who may browse porn at work from browsing porn at work, and it's a major pain in the ass to the honest people trying to do their jobs. I haven't done a formal study, but it must cost the company thousands of dollars every month (maybe more) in the cost of the service plus the man hours spent going through this exercise. How much would the company lose if they just stopped content filtering? Significantly less.

      But that doesn't matter. Management looks at this as an IT issue, not a management issue. If they push this responsibility onto us, that's one less thing they have to do, and one more level of blame that separates them from potential violators of corporate policy.

      Going back to topic, games are the same way. If someone goofs off all day playing Solitaire, management looks at it as a problem with the computer or a problem with the IT department. Funny, they never seem to see it for what it really is: a problem with the employee or a problem with the employee's manager.

    3. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Agent__Smith · · Score: 0

      "Leaving aside the snobbery and bigotry of that "leaning on brooms" comment, this proposal is seeing some discussion here in North Carolina. Most that I've heard and read correctly points to this as a management issue, not something that merits legislation."

      How the heck do you get BIGOTRY from reading that comment? Man, you are really reaching! Do you see BIGOTRY in everything? Do you not know the meaning of the word? I would reluctantly grant you the "SNOBBERY", but "BIGOTRY"? That's a pretty serious charge, and after reading the exact same comment you did, completely unwarranted and without evidence.

      Holy crap! You must see demons everywhere in your world and/or mind! Good luck with that!

      --
      "It seems that we are at the age where life stops giving us things, and starts taking them away..." Indiana Jones
    4. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by minion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which, of course, it doesn't because 600,000 man days of work are now being 'lost' by the employees switching to instead. That 600,000 days was an illusion - the productivity was never there to be had, in some jobs it's impossible for people to work as if they were machines. I including programming in this by the way.

      That is a very good arguement. I work for a company that realises this: Most of our staff doesn't take coffee breaks, or real lunchtimes. Instead, we prefer to sit spend half of our lunch hour eating and the other half shooting eachother in video games.

      Productivity is higher than if we simply ate our food and went back to work - our minds are refreshed because we took a moment away from critical thinking (IT/Programming job, BTW).

      I'm glad I work for a company like that now, and I wish other companies would realize that as well.

      There'd be a lot less depressed people in the world if more companies treated employees like humans, rather than bottom lines.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    5. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I love reading all the slackers trying to excuse their massive Slashdot reading time while working in this thread.

      No company is asking you to be productive 100% of the time. All they're asking is 40 productive hours a week. That's less than 24% of your time. I'd hope anyone could manage a 24% productivity rate.

      Face it, that time you're SMSing your wife and doing crossword puzzles is time you're stealing from your employer. Find something worthwhile to do then. You can do your crosswords and talk with your wife after work. You should never be doing it while you're supposed to be working.

      Now no one can really go a straight 8 hours, but the breaks you're taking should be trips to the WC or the like, not something trivial and pointless like reading webpages or doing crossword puzzles. If you're going to do that while at work you damned better make up for the lost time after hours.

    6. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Maybe, if you're on an hourly gig. If you're on salary, you're being paid to be productive, not work a set number of hours per week. And if taking crossword breaks makes you more productive, I see no reason why the employer shouldn't encourage the behavior (unless it interferes with other employees or something).

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    7. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by mccalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Face it, that time you're SMSing your wife and doing crossword puzzles is time you're stealing from your employer.

      I am my employer. I run a one-man contracting business. And whilst my current client requires me to put in x hours it's true, they aren't really paying for that. They're paying me for results.

      And I provide them. Yes, including Slashdot and SMS, all fully known about by my client. If I dropped the web browsing or stopped sending the odd SMS my productivity wouldn't go up - I'd just have to find something else to distract me when needed. When programming, you can't just stare at a computer screen for 8 hours a day and expect to just keep typing (or drawing UML diagrams or whatever else). It's utterly unrealistic - humans just don't work that way.

      no one can really go a straight 8 hours, but the breaks you're taking should be trips to the WC or the like, not something trivial and pointless like reading webpages or doing crossword puzzles.

      It's a very long time since I was a schoolboy asking permission to use the WC - I use it as and when I choose. Similarly, it is my decision whether to continue banging my head against a brick wall on a particular problem, or whether to just take a quick distraction by maybe reading a web page or nipping off to fetch some coffee from outside before returning to the task with a fresher mind. It is my client's decision as to whether they find my approach acceptable, and for that only the results count.

      I'm not advocating lazing your life away at work, but I am rejecting the notion that only work-related things can happen at work. For some jobs that's true - as a summer job when I was still at University I used to work as a kitchen helper, loading vast amounts of cutlery and dishes into an industrial dishwasher as quickly as possible, then getting the servings ready for the waitresses to send out again. I enjoyed that job as it happens, and not a crossword to be seen. But then it wasn't necessary - it was mindless work and you could just get on with it. Programming, and many other jobs, simply aren't like that.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    8. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I spend 45hrs at work, then I can waste 5hrs doing what I like.

      Sometimes in our techy jobs, our minds need downtime/idle waste time to keep us on the ball. You cant ask an athelete to nonstop run 200miles a day can you. Consider reading the web like training/stretching for a runner.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    9. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How much would the company lose if they just stopped content filtering? Significantly less.

      Until the harassment lawsuits start.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    10. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, and how many of those managers, the first houre or two of their day in the office is spent reading "Financial Times" or "Wall St. Journal"?

      I call bullshit on this being job-related reading. They're really just checking on their stock accounts and mutual fund performance.

    11. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone goofs off all day playing Solitaire, management looks at it as a problem with the computer or a problem with the IT department. Funny, they never seem to see it for what it really is: a problem with the employee or a problem with the employee's manager.

      I am glad to see that at least someone on slashdot understands the issue here. Good post.

    12. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Seigen · · Score: 1
      Yes, quite often something like programming doesn't seem to fit well into doing more than 3 or 4 hours at a time and then you pretty much need a break, for your continued health if nothing else.

      Personally I've done a lot of very boring and tedious coding and other problems and sometimes without listening to music or ocassionally skiming a web page to find something interesting to keep my brain from concluding that you really need just five minutes of sleep and then everything will be better. Human beings are not machines, and it is a mistake to model us that simply.

    13. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Very true, it IS a management issue, not IT. Same goes for whatever employees might be doing on the Internet. The problem is what isn't getting done, not how much time is spent elsewhere.

      It is also a symptom of politics as usual. NC is just behind. A decade ago I was the grunt removing Solitaire from Virginia state computers per the order of an assistant Secretary. This guy was a know-nothing who'd helped the Gov win and in the process secured himself a cushy job. The first order of business? Make up something to do that he could pretend was important. Unfortunately, the real work was being put on hold during my search-and-destroy missions. At least I had a copy of the memo to show users so they didn't blame me or my boss for interrupting their work. So how much was this guy being paid to spend his time ordering Solitaire deleted? Don't ask questions for which you don't really want the answers.

    14. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would surf porn at work if the filters allowed. That is the depth of my addiction ;).

      Seriously, while we do have filters where I work, I can say that I have only ever hit it when I was directed to go to someplace that I shouldn't really be; in the 2 years that I've been here, I had trouble with a legitimate site only once. Maybe your filters are just too damn tight by default? Has anyone done an analysis of the sites that need exceptions--perhaps there's a trend and one could extrapolate to other sites that haven't yet been asked for, but nevertheless would be legit.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    15. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by drsquare · · Score: 1

      You cant ask an athelete to nonstop run 200miles a day can you.

      No, but you can ask them to stand about doing mild exercise for 8 hours a day. Let's face it, in general 'techy' jobs are hardly mentally exhausting, most of the time you're just doing grunt work or reimplementing the wheel. An athelete running 200 miles a day would be like a computer programmer writing a new hardware driver every day. I think that some people here are overestimating the difficulty and hardship of their jobs.

    16. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by reallocate · · Score: 1

      I simply disbelieve that it is possible to be productive 100% of the day for 100% of all working days...

      Yes, that's why it is so important that management makes clear its expectations of each employee. If an employee can spend an hour a day goofing off and still meet expectations, then management has no grounds for penalizing the employee for lack of performance. They may decide that he is influencing less capable workers who spend even more time goofing off, or that he needs to be assigned to a job that can actually challenge his abilities, or that they'll begin a award/bonus program to encourage employees to exceed expectations.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    17. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by reallocate · · Score: 1

      The comment reflects the stereotyping of all government employees in a southern state as broom pushers. That's bigotry.

      --
      -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    18. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Place I work for has no content filtering and an official policy that you may use the Internet for personal use.

      No harassment lawsuits in the five years I've been here.

    19. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by rainer_d · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I'd mod you up if I had point at the moment.
      Good comment.

      --
      Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    20. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Wybaar · · Score: 1
      That process sounds like it could be streamlined somewhat. Why does the request go to the IT staff before the manager has approved it? I would assume that if a staff member needs to go to a certain site that has been blocked, his or her manager knows why they need to do that. I understand that there may be internal protocols that require that the process be done in this order, but it sounds like this might be a better solution:

      1. User files a request for access to a blocked site.
      2. Manager receives request, discusses it with user, approves it.
      3. IT receives request, investigates site, approves it.
      4. IT uses some internal resource (say a password-protected webpage) to request that the blocked site be unblocked.
      5. Request automatically updates the filters or queues the request so that multiple sites can be unblocked at once by the filter maintainer.
      6. Once request or maintainer has modified the filters, the user and their manager are automatically informed.

      Note that most of what's written there is stuff you're already doing -- but it avoids the problem of investigating a site that the manager might not allow the user to access even if it's okay from the IT standpoint. In addition, you have documented buy-in from the user's manager in case any policy gets violated.
      --
      Y|
    21. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      No, harassment is already covered in company policy--doing it is punishable by termination, period. If someone is dumb enough to browse porn on company time (some sites DO get through the filter) and they get caught, they're let go. This is a reasonable policy.

      Spending $thousands a month on content filters and the silly procedures that result is beyond reasonable. Sure, a company can choose to do it if they've got that much money to burn (and we do), but no court would require a company to go through that kind of time and expense.

      People who would sue the company for harassment for not having content filters would have sued the company for harassment anyway; they're not going to let a little thing like reasonableness get in their way. Or, God forbid, they may be right. A company may not be cracking down on surfing porn like it should, and in such a case, they SHOULD lose a lot of money on harassment lawsuits. (My company does crack down, obviously.)

      Don't be fooled; this isn't about the scare of harassment, though that's a common cop-out. It is about control and not giving employees an iota of trust or respect.

    22. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree, our filters are too tight. I don't know the name of the third-party company we pay to set the rules, but I do know that it is broken down by category. Some of the more common ones are pornography, hacking, gaming, gambling, hate (e.g. racism sites), violence, anonymizers, etc.

      I think that our policy is simply, "block 'em all." The problem is that sometimes we run into silly situations. For example, the content filter considers Babelfish to be an anonymizer site and it's blocked. It almost took an act of Congress (i.e. hundreds of complaints) to finally get the Google language translation site whitelisted, and even then, it will only translate words, not a whole site.

      Another example: Bugmenot is blocked as a "hacking/criminal activity" site. (?) So if there's an article in the New York Times about our industry, I simply don't read it because frankly, I'm too lazy to go create a bogus e-mail account and register.

    23. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      I disagree a bit here - your company had some form of rational judgement at some level to decide to lock down their internet access.

      It sounded like you work for a large organization with a lot of employees. Whenever you get a lot of users (employees, students, library patrons, whatever), you can't count on good judgement.

      As far as policies go, just having one and firing someone for extraordinarily poor judgement doesn't necessarily get a company off the hook for a harassment lawsuit. Lawyers go after deep pockets, and large companies have those. If they didn't believe that the $thousands a month were immunizing them against $millions, they wouldn't be doing what you're doing.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    24. Re:Slackers Are a Management Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bigotry.

      But true none the less :-) Y'all have a nice day, now. Hea?

  31. Solitaire? by Forcepath · · Score: 0

    Wait, I think they stole the idea of deleting solitaire off computers from watching You've Got Mail too many times...

    --
    this .sig for sale
  32. Re:90% of all statistics are made up on the spot.. by Luke+Psywalker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's an editorial from today on this very subject.

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/Heckler/Lies-damn-lies- and-statistics/2005/03/20/1111253883481.html?

    I call every statistic a lie until I see the raw sample figures and how they were gathered. There should be an international standard on how stats are gathered and quoted. I'm sick to fucking death of statistic manipulation. Although in this particular case I don't really care and would not at all be surprised if it was true.

  33. taskings... by trifster · · Score: 0, Troll

    this is a simple problem. give them more work. they don't do the work fire them. See, when I have a shitload to do, there is no time for solitare, slashdot, etc. More work will equal less screwing off.

    1. Re:taskings... by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if the worker is a programmer?

      Sometimes she or she will be waiting for a compile to finish or for the Java Virtual Machine to start up.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  34. Funny Cartoon by roblaird · · Score: 3, Funny

    We have a cartoon on the door of the IT room that shows some users playing solitaire on their desks with actual decks of cards. The caption reads "Our systems are down, we have to do everything manually."

  35. This is nothing new... by glsiii · · Score: 1

    Other states have had the same regulation on preinstalled games for a while. For example, Virginia has had a law stating that all games installed with the operating system have to be removed before the end user gets the computer. Which makes things interesting when solitare is protected by Windows File Protection... :-/

  36. Solitaire Helps by Freaky+Spook · · Score: 1

    I remember there was a study done in London on how IT can make work more or less stressful, one part of the study was for 1 month they put solitaire on the computers & for 1 month they took solitaire off & made the network more controlled. Employee stress went up & office productivity actually decreased as users were forced to spend too much time at their desks infront of a computer with nothing to keep them mentally stimulated. They found that solitare was not actually a time wasting device & most users would use it for a couple of minutes at a time to refresh themselves & keep them focused on their work.

  37. Suddenly, the available alternative by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 2, Funny

    at sourceforge will be popular =)

    1. Re:Suddenly, the available alternative by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Java based games are great as they don't show up in the normal places (they have to be found the hard way in an audit as automatic tools can't cope) and the Java runtime is most often or not actually required for normal function of the computers other apps.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  38. How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employee by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I assume that there are dozens of online solitaire games avaiable. Unless they take the extra step of blocking all game related websites, the whole thing is pointless.

    You are overanalyzing the problem. All you have to do is have the official poilicy of "no games" and then you are free to fire someone playing at work. OK, maybe they have to get a warning first.

    The "no games" policy should be accompanied with a "no unauthorized installs" policy.

  39. Need i point out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that they could still play online via internet explorer

    thus is todays state of microsoft computing....plainly obvious yet oblivious

  40. Karl Marx? Identity? by utlemming · · Score: 0

    Forgive me for asking, but why on earth does the article make reference to Marxian thought? His economic theories have been largely disproved, much less should they be relied on as a source of authority in a capitalistic society. Even if you are a socialist, there are far more authoritative and modern socialist thinkers which can be quoted. Besides, Marx argued for the voilent overthrow of capitalism. I had trouble digesting the argument that by not allowing people to play video games, they might lose their identity.

    --
    The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
    1. Re:Karl Marx? Identity? by 5ynic · · Score: 5, Informative

      Marxian theories have, on the contrary, largely proven correct since his death. Marx did not argue "for" violent overthrow, but rather that violent attempts to overthrow capitalism were at his time of writing inevitable - and therefore not worth arguing "for" or "against".

      --
      ceci n'est pas un sig
  41. This is STILL stupid. by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have worked at a lot of companies, and one common theme among them is almost always, "Let's get rid of the games." As a sysadmin, I've actually been the one tasked with implementing it. However...

    I think these policies are, in a word, stupid. If someone is going to waste time, they're going to waste time. If it's not on a game of Solitaire, it will be on some other non-work activity. The fact is that you cannot command a person to work for eight (if they're lucky) solid hours. Or as Scott Kirwin put it in the article, "Managers [have] lost sight that workers are real people, not robots."

    Every time I've been asked to delete the games off of machines, I've expressed extreme disapproval. I've tried to explain until I'm blue in the face that it will not increase productivity. I've tried to explain that if you treat employees like they're four years old by taking away their toys, it will only cause resentment and a resulting LOSS of productivity. I've tried to point out that small Solitaire breaks (or any other mindless activity) actually help a lot of people get back into a more productive mindset going forward. I've also tried to point out that games such as Solitaire help people new to computers learn their way around. For example, it taught my mother, who had only used DOS-based accounting software, how to use a mouse. Sure, it sounds simple to you, but keep in mind that she had no idea what left-clicking, dragging-and-dropping, minimizing and maximizing, etc. were, but she was up to speed within a few minutes thanks to Solitaire.

    But in general, all that stuff makes no difference to management. Since companies have layed off and outsourced to the point where they can't function any more, all that matters is that we have to be productive 24x7. Barring that, all that matters is that we have to LOOK productive 24x7.

    So stupid...

    1. Re:This is STILL stupid. by garcia · · Score: 4, Informative

      The fact is that you cannot command a person to work for eight (if they're lucky) solid hours. Or as Scott Kirwin put it in the article, "Managers [have] lost sight that workers are real people, not robots."

      You have never worked in a call center have you? They have supervised slave labor down to a science. Outside of taking advantage of 3 minute leeway for phone logins and clock punches there was very little time available for screwing off.

      They had all the computers locked down, no applications installed other than those you needed for your job, remote screenshot ability, and apparently an alert when you were surfing on a page other than the ones that were permitted.

      You were scored on your performance and adherence to the time schedule.

    2. Re:This is STILL stupid. by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In other words, they wanted to get value for what they were paying. Shocking!!!

      If the employees are getting their paychecks and can quit whenever they like, it isn't slave labor...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:This is STILL stupid. by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      That's my point--this is not a good thing.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't these places have an extremely high rate of turnover? Though I haven't worked at one of these places myself, I do know some folks who have, and they got burned out VERY quickly.

      It's a shame, because when an employee gets burned out like that or finds another job somewhere else, the company has to go through the time and expense of retraining. With a high rate of turnover, this gets very expensive for the company, but they don't see the cost because it's not as obvious a line item on a balance sheet as is, say, a person's salary that they will lay off. Plus, when you stick people in an environment like this, you also run the risk of having employees that silently rebel by turning in a piss-poor performance. As someone who has called a call center, I am too familiar with this phenomenon. It results in lower customer satisfaction at best and serious PR or even legal problems at worst.

      Just something to think about...

    4. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got to love a guy with two and a half thousand slashdot posts telling other people not to goof off at work!

    5. Re:This is STILL stupid. by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      Every time I've been asked to delete the games off of machines, I've expressed extreme disapproval. I've tried to explain until I'm blue in the face that it will not increase productivity. I've tried to explain that if you treat employees like they're four years old by taking away their toys, it will only cause resentment and a resulting LOSS of productivity.

      I don't know about that. The building I work in used to have a dept of transportation office across the hall. Right outside the elevator in the hall you could see through the window to one of the office workers desks. Every single time I stood there waiting for the elevator there would be someone in there playing solitare. It never failed. As near as I could tell half of the workers in the office did absolutely no real work. Forget -loss- of productivity, there was -no- productivity.

      A couple years later the office got moved someplace else (no idea where) so I can't tell if they got "downsized" or simply moved. However in this same time period the city and state government (this is in Austin TX) has been really pushing for additional transportation money. They recently have been pushing a ridiculously expensive toll road plan to fill the budget gap. Frankly I think the city can shove its toll system up its collective ass and then fire the slackers to fix the budget gap. The thought of my hard earned money going into tolls to drive to work which then eventually gets routed to some slacker to play solitare just annoys me to no end.

    6. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example, it taught my mother, who had only used DOS-based accounting software, how to use a mouse.

      Absolutely. I was in IT for an office that was moving to Windows 3.1 from a DOS only environment. Most of the folks didn't know how to use a mouse. When they asked me how, I told them to play Solitaire -- it teaches you all the mouse skills you need using a game that everyone knows the rules to.

    7. Re:This is STILL stupid. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Au contraire - goofing off at work can be a high art form. But part of the thrill is the risk of trouble for getting caught....

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    8. Re:This is STILL stupid. by anakin876 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the actual figure thrown around by the statisticians and psychologists is that the amount of money you save by not having to train a new person is aproximately 3 months worth of salary. So for the managers out there, before firing someone ask them if the new person you hire will be worth that 3 months of salary - you won't get an extra productivity boost from the new guy. It will cost you 3 months salary of the current guy.

    9. Re:This is STILL stupid. by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Call centers also rely on unskilled workers who are unqualified to do anything doing mindless repetetive work that requires absolutely no creative thought. They can manage these people like they're flipping burgers or picking cotton & it won't make a difference.

      Of course, if you're talking tech-support, I can imagine things are a lot less strict for the higher-tier employees - the one that actually have to think about how to solve problems.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    10. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Maybe they work for Paul Anka. He wants "full value on his money." Please note that he also "slices like a fucking hammer."

    11. Re:This is STILL stupid. by splorp! · · Score: 1

      Depends on the call center. The one I work in required 6 weeks of classroom-style training followed by 6 weeks of closely monitored phone work. Then, once the phone-training supervisor determined you were skilled enough, you were released into the main queue without the immediate monitoring. You are still randomly monitored several times a month and the time on the phone actively taking calls must exceed a certain level. Oh, and for the last 6 months a minimum of 6 hours a week OT has been required. I do not work tech-support, but if you think I am unskilled, you are incorrect.

      --
      Please don't humanize the morons around me. It makes me very uncomfortable.
    12. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If the employees are getting their paychecks and can quit whenever they like...

      Would explain the massive churn rate in that industry...

    13. Re:This is STILL stupid. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      As a sysadmin, I've actually been the one tasked with implementing it. However... I think these policies are, in a word, stupid. If someone is going to waste time, they're going to waste time. Every time I've been asked to delete the games off of machines, I've expressed extreme disapproval. I've tried to explain until I'm blue in the face that it will not increase productivity.

      Boy, you sure sound like a insubordinate slacker. Your boss tells you to perform a very important task that will undoubtedly increase productivity, but you refuse to do it. Furthermore, you make paltry excuses for not wanting to perform the very important money saving task given to you by your superior. Each minute you refuse to perform your this important task, countless dollars of profit are lost. You should not be questioning your superior's authority. Your job is not to think. Having personal thoughts is stealing from the company. If you aren't part of the solution, you are part of the problem. You're fired.

      </SATIRE>

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    14. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Martz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My girlfriend has just left a company which ran the same call center setup as you describe. The "Team leaders" have monitoring applications which show how many calls are in the queue, the longest call waiting, staff logged on etc. More importantly to them - who is logged off either because they are away from their desk, toilet break or aftercall time of 3 minutes to do administration and paperwork.

      However, even this wasn't enough. They decided that people were taking too much time between calls and abusing the aftercall status. Management, who in turn monitor the teams efficiency through a desktop application, decided that aftercall would switch off after 3 minutes and a new call would be put through automatically. This put her and the other call center staff in even more stressful situation where they couldn't even have a minute to recover after a stressful, difficult or administratively complicated incoming call.

      Their machines are also locked down to dedicated applications, there is also some hardcore email monitoring going on when they chat to their work friends, on or off a call. Playing games is completely out of the question to the ~250 or so employees. It surely cannot help performance when they cannot escape from their jobs even for a moment. They are forced to work 100% of the time, or receive a rollocking.

      She is very happy she's had an opportunity to move on to somewhere else now, but from her stories after work it seems that management are forced to trust the accurate stats generated by technology and use it as a benchmark to increase productivity. Staff are leaving left, right and center.. yet they look at their historical performance stats and decide that they weren't worth keeping anyway. Crazy.

    15. Re:This is STILL stupid. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...and you may have to shell out three months (or more) salary to the poor schmuck you're firing, whether in accrued leave, severance or both on top of the three months you'll waste training the new guy--and it just gets worse the higher up you go. There are horror stories at damn near every company of the worthless manager who just can't seem to get fired barring gunning down the place because the parachute is just a little too golden, so it's cheaper to churn the ranks to keep him/her in a constant state of denial and let the company die the death of 1000 cuts in the process.

    16. Re:This is STILL stupid. by Mickey+Jameson · · Score: 1

      People at my company still play solitaire and freecell. They have been since Windows was put on the desktop. None of them have figured out alt-tab or escape, so they openly just play games. Worst offenders?

      First shift supervisor. From 6am-7am (before assistant supervisor comes in) she plays freecell. That is one hour of zero productivity. Times 5 (days) times 50 (weeks) and that's 250 hours. Or you can think of it as 10 days. That's one paycheck that was "earned" by playing freecell. How is this good for business?

      Receptionist. Hates her job. Knows she's not going to get fired for whatever reason. Plays freecell. Doesn't try to hide it. Customers pass through all day and she is still playing freecell. Sometimes she's so into the game that she blows _customers_ off. How is this good for business?

      Now the biggest offender. Our Netware admin. Does maybe two media conversions a week. At 25 bucks a pop. Huge billing. Aside from that, he doesn't do anything except updating his personal website and play, you guessed it, freecell. Back when I Back Orificed his machine to figure out what the hell he was doing all day (porn, homework, freecell), I noticed a trend in his freecell playing. Started at game #1, then #2, then #3 in an attempt to beat them all. This was 4 years ago, but at the time he was at game #~17,000. 17,000 consecutive games. (just checked this morning and he's at 26,477.) He also won't get fired because he's VP's son. But that jackass makes more than me and I actually work. How is this good for business?

      Yes, people will always find ways to not do their jobs. When I'm told to try to control slack such as content filtering, I'm looked at as a complete dickwad and a control freak. Yet these idiots don't realize their added loss of productivity cuts into the bottom line. Come year end, there is NEVER any money for bonuses.

      Work is not supposed to be fun. It's called work for a reason. You're at work to WORK, not play games. You want to blow off some steam? Go outside and take a walk. You want to play games? Do it at home.

    17. Re:This is STILL stupid. by superflippy · · Score: 1

      all that matters is that we have to LOOK productive 24x7

      And that's why Lynx is wonderful. A DOS-looking terminal window always looks productive.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    18. Re:This is STILL stupid. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      You have never worked in a call center have you?

      You sir, have not found how to make effective use of the hold button.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    19. Re:This is STILL stupid. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the employees are getting their paychecks and can quit whenever they like, it isn't slave labor...

      A slave can quit working whenever they want, too.

      Of course may get beaten, tortured, left to starve to death, or executed at that point in time depending on who is their captors.

      The problem is that people automatically assume that if you are paid money then you are not a slave. If you work out of fear of starving to death or the fact your supervisors will send you to a worse camp in artic cirlce in Siberia even if you are paid money... I would still assume that is slave labor because you have no choice in the matter.

      The same could be said about capitalism if you are afraid to loose your job. Like the bad social stigma and the fear of not having money force many people to work in low paid positions that they feel they have no choice in.

      This is not so bad as one can simply wake up one morning and decide that they can live without income and go into work and tell them they no longer want to work there. However most people will not over come this fear even though no one is physically putting them into a labor camp. They might as well emotionally be in one.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  42. why does an IRS employee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    need internet access ? and why do they need it now but they didnt need it 10years ago ?

    imagine how many keyloggers,trojans,spyware etc are floating round gov machines because of those employees, now imagine what you can do with an IRS machine /me starts port scanning .gov machines

  43. This is an opportunity for Firefox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone needs to write a Firefox Solitaire extension that has a boss-key that quickly makes it look like a pre-defined webpage (ie your company website).

    1. Re:This is an opportunity for Firefox by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

      I've got one already: Alt-Home. Then Alt-Left Arrow takes be back to where I was. Or if it's a true look-like-I'm-busy-NOW moment, Alt-F4 does the trick.

  44. What about smoke breaks? by ccnull · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I wonder how much time the employees collectvely spend smoking cigarettes -- a colossal waste of time, not to mention the associated health issues.

    CN, anti-smoking crusader

    1. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Zombie · · Score: 1
      So... are you suggesting that they start allowing smoking in the office again, so smokers won't have to interrupt their work to get their fix?

      (I'm joking - I'm a rabid anti-smoking crusader just like you. If they would just fire all the smokers, this would not be an issue.)

    2. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than fire them, I've come up with another way of stopping people from smoking.

      Make smoking more deadly.

      If smoking for a year killed you, how many people would continue smoking? Not many. And, the ones that chose to continue smoking would be dead within a year. So after a year, no more smokers!

    3. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. We once did a little impromptu timing of people who went out for smoke breaks; of the people who walked past our particular cubes on the way out, they left, on average, 5 times a day. They also spent 15 minutes outside. That's over an hour a day lost to smoking, not counting the normal hour lunch break. It got to the point where I don't even feel guilty for coming in half an hour late or leaving 5 or 10 minutes early on occassion. I've taken 0 smoke breaks in the last 3 years and I refuse to get the shaft just because I don't want lung cancer.

    4. Re:What about smoke breaks? by xtr3mist · · Score: 1

      I take the same amount of time for my breaks that non-smokers do.

      I smoke on my breaks, while alot of other non-smokers spend their time eating junk food.

    5. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wonder how much time non-smokers collectively spend in a daze while the rest of us jack our brains up on caffeine and nicotine and do their work for them....

    6. Re:What about smoke breaks? by zurtle · · Score: 1
      Ever heard of 2nd hand smoke??!!!

      Would that be IRSocide?

      Does this conflict with George Bush's new law that outlaws death? The RIAA must be looking forward to this... file-sharers will no longer be able to hide behind death as an excuse to not be prosecuted.

      --
      Couldn't stand the weather
    7. Re:What about smoke breaks? by magefile · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the fact that there is, indeed, proof of second-hand smoke leading to lung cancer, how 'bout the more "environmental" stuff? Stuff like, on the more severe side, asthmatics and others with respiratory issues having to use their medication more often, or on the more mundane side, other workers being annoyed by the smell (just as they would be if you played loud music on speakers in your cube)?

    8. Re:What about smoke breaks? by ShaunC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I wonder how much time the employees collectvely spend smoking cigarettes -- a colossal waste of time, not to mention the associated health issues.
      You're missing the fact that smoking is as much a social activity as it is an unhealthy one. I can't fault you for this, most non-smokers (at least most of the ones who aren't ex-smokers) don't notice this.

      It's hard to explain to non-smokers, but smokers tend to have a subconscious yet very strong social bond with one another. Smokers are generally relegated to a single location (standing just outside of the back entrance, for example) and upon encountering other smokers there, will engage in conversation. It's almost universally true, even with folks like me who for the most part are shy and wouldn't otherwise strike up conversations with random strangers.

      If someone bums a cigarette from me, I won't turn them down, and I've never been turned down the few times I've had to ask others. I've never given a cent to the homeless guys standing at the busy intersections with cardboard signs, but the ones who ask for a smoke will get one, along with an offer of a light. We smokers may indeed be a bunch of arrogant assholes who think that the world is our ashtray, but we look out for each other - and we have something in common.

      What I'm getting at here is that having a few workers go out for a smoke break isn't necessarily a bad thing. They're getting face time with each other that they may not otherwise have had the opportunity to get. This helps to build and reinforce positive relationships between employees; it allows the peons see and interact with the PHBs as real people, and vice versa. Who knows, maybe one day you'll step out for a smoke and run into the C[ETF]O? You'd never have had the chance to speak with him otherwise, but a quick conversation over a cigarette, and you've got "synergy."

      Some co-workers socialize between cubicles. Some co-workers socialize at lunch. Some co-workers socialize on the golf course. Some co-workers socialize at the water fountain. And some of us socialize in the smoking area. Everybody "wastes time" at work (though not to the extent where 50% of their computer time is wasted, maybe I should apply for a job at the IRS!).

      I'm not trying to glorify smoking. If anyone reading this doesn't smoke but finds it appealing, allow me to be the first to say DON'T START. It's filthy, it's expensive, and it will probably eventually kill you after it kills me. But if you're already a smoker and you aren't taking advantage of this to network with other smokers around you (assuming there are others), you _should_ start doing that.

      BTW I've never heard of any company which gave smokers - and only smokers - breaks. Everyone gets a break, the smokers spend it smoking, the non-smokers spend it playing Solitaire...
      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    9. Re:What about smoke breaks? by value_added · · Score: 1

      "It's hard to explain to non-smokers, but smokers tend to have a subconscious yet very strong social bond with one another."

      Maybe it's simply that smoking is a social thing?

      While it's possible there may be an element of persecution complex in people who smoke as a result of the anti-smoking hysteria from their non-smoking brethren, I think doing like things encourages bonding. Especially when having a cigarette.

      Today, if you invite people together for a social occasion and ask what everoyne wants, the responses will range from beer to white wine to red wine to mineral water to herbal tea to juice to some soft drink. If you can't have a communal experience, what's left besides Solitaire?

    10. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't valid proof, though. In fact, the only proof found a statistically insignifigant raise in the percentage of people who got lung cancer among those who smoked and those who were merely exposed to second hand smoke.

      Face it, the smoker next to you isn't going to kill you. You're far more likely to get hit by a bus than die of second hand smoke. No study has shown any valid link between second hand smoke and lung cancer. The only study that did was an EPA study that cherry-picked the results to match their intended outcome.

      Secondhand Smoke Myth Debunked

    11. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to know where the people posting here work. I've NEVER experienced a company that gave any more wiggle room on breaks to smokers. In fact, I've found quite the opposite -- because people assume you're going to abuse your breaks to smoke.

      I take two breaks a day -- about 5 minutes each -- to smoke. So that's 10 minutes. I don't take "coffee breaks" -- of which, we're allowed 15 minutes a day.

      But I've had management "speak to me" about my breaks.

      Luckily I just got a new boss that has some common sense. She says you get an hour lunch and 15 minutes of breaks each day. Use it when and how you want.

      So we have people that only use a few minutes to grab coffee and drink it while working, and only take 30 minutes for lunch, and thus leave 30 minutes early so they can pick their kids up at school.

      Or, so-and-so can leave early to make a doctor's appointment if she skips her lunch.

      My boss has decided, rightly I believe, that this will make people happier (thus better workers), and stop people from having to do things like call in sick or take half days just to be able to go to the doctors.

      It's a good idea. We are just expected to let our supervisors know if we're doing something very unusual, like skipping lunch and leaving an hour early -- so if it's going to be a problem, they can let us know (i.e. if there's afternoon meetings, or my absence during that last hour of the day is going to cause a problem).

      Previous to this people had scheduled lunch times. So often, I'd have to take an important call during my lunch hour, and then couldn't take it later -- even though I worked during my scheduled hour doing something *required*.

      Sometimes I truly believe that managers just use a Magic 8 ball to decide policies....

    12. Re:What about smoke breaks? by ccnull · · Score: 1

      By that rationale, one could argue that Solitaire teaches logic skills, that playing Quake teaches hand-eye coordination, that shopping teaches money management, and that gambling teaches lessons in probability. Sure, there's value in all of these things (and in the socialization picked up by smoking), but ultimately that's not what you're getting paid to do all day -- ESPECIALLY at the IRS!

    13. Re:What about smoke breaks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no evidence, except a paper released by the EPA that was shown in a courtroom that the results were lied about... so... where's your proof?

      --A non-smoker that doesn't like smoke, but would rather argue about personal comfort than lie about second hand smoke.

  45. Duh!! by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh come on! This is the government we are talking about. In order for each orginization to get more funding, they need a reason to spend it. Either hiring more unnessary employees, or increasing the hourly wage (not going to happen as it raises a red flag).

    I've had friends work for the US gov in IT. From what they've told me, it basically a Union. Once your in the game, you actually have to TRY and get fired. It's totally the opposite of the corporate word.

    And did I mention, your tax dollars are paying for these scams?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:Duh!! by slashkitty · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's totally the opposite of the corporate word.

      Uhm, no, it's pretty much like that in many big companies as well. If you've been reading slashdot, you could have read about the support guy that tapped a managers computer and found that he only spend 10% of his time working. I'd have to say that's about how much I worked in my last full time job. (Which I tried to get fired from, but eventually just had to quit.)

      Computers have helped productivity so much, but many companies still have all these jobs for people. It's a shame really, because the whole business world could run on an hour or two instead of the 8+ hours that many people need to see you in the office.

      --
      -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
    2. Re:Duh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you've been reading slashdot, you could have read about the support guy that tapped a managers computer and found that he only spend 10% of his time working.

      I'm pretty sure that was a support guy ... at the department of motor vehicles.

    3. Re:Duh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work as a contractor supporting Border Patrol.

      We have a federal employee who, in the last two years, has been arrested for assulting his wife, arrested for assulting his son, and arresting for DUI (fell asleep at a stop sign).

      He makes derogatory comments about women in front of women.

      He takes 10-20 smoke breaks a day.

      He's been caught surfing Playboy at work.

      He's called his co-workers fuckers twice in front of other people.

      It's all been reported to management but they don't do anything about it.

      I asked why and the answer was plain and simple - it's easier to cover it up than deal with a lawsuit from him.

      Yes, it is definitely as you say - once your'e in, you have to actually ask to be fired to be fired. Screw up - move up. He's a GS-12 step 4, makes about $67,000 a year to do nothing all day long.

    4. Re:Duh!! by TheGavster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You feel like you have to try to get fired, until you see your first major staff reduction. When you're in, you're in, but they feel no attachment to you. The slackers are the first to go in budget tightening. And every budget gets tightened from time to time.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    5. Re:Duh!! by john82 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that this is the Tax Dept of the State of North Carolina, not the Federal IRS. That said, it IS basically a union. It takes an intervention from a higher power to get someone fired for mere sloth. Perhaps you would find it more appalling instead to see the conditions under which folks work in the basement of the Revenue building. They don't get paid much, it's hotter than blazes in the summer in Raleigh (and humid). The employees are packed in there cheek by jowl. Oh, and the job is mind-numbing for most. Other than that, it's a regular picnic. Occassionally someone plays solitaire on their antiquated PC. And you all wonder why they're not more motivated.

      As they said in the article:
      If someone is so bored that playing solitaire is stimulating, then the problem is not with the game, it's with the job.

    6. Re:Duh!! by Splab · · Score: 1

      It would be logic that way, but in my experience slaggers has a tendency to be promoted - why? because since they never do anything they never f*** up, and thus must be competent people... right?

    7. Re:Duh!! by joshv · · Score: 1

      I've had friends work for the US gov in IT. From what they've told me, it basically a Union. Once your in the game, you actually have to TRY and get fired. It's totally the opposite of the corporate word.

      Nope, sounds exactly like every Fortune 500 corporation I've worked for.

    8. Re:Duh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work as a contractor supporting Border Patrol.

      So you're saying you're a rifle distributor for the border patrol? I would say you're on equal moral grounds as this guy you're complaining about so much

    9. Re:Duh!! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Basically, those that are slacking or just do the bare minimum are the ones that tend to get promoted and/or stay on the job.

      However, if you try and go beyond the call of duty as it were; you might find yourself "let go" by your direct manager above you. Trust me, no manager wants to be incharge of a self assertive over achiver. Why? Because they pose a threat at taking THEIR job. At the end of the day, if you want to work hard to be promoted in a an overly burcratic company (such as Dell)...be prepared for office politics involving a power struggle.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  46. ftp://[someserver]/sol.exe by weighn · · Score: 1

    Give em a break -- post links to sol.exe here

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:ftp://[someserver]/sol.exe by tqft · · Score: 1

      Please post a link to zipped version so when the admins remove sol etc the games can be downloaded extracted and run direct from directory without installing.

      Works for a lot of windows programs - not ideal, but unless someone installs a process manager that identifies and deletes the process, allows only registered programs to start or audits all the hard disk space in an ord nothing can stop getting around a "locked" down windows box.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
  47. As technology continues to save labor... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    ...society will collectively struggle to find something to do with the leftover time. Ideally we'd have somem kind of utopia where everybody is free to meet their best potential. Socialism aspires to do this, but human nature causes it to fail. Look on the bright side though--would you rather your tax dollars go to more weapons, or towards people figuring out how to hide games from their bosses? And if the whole tax dollar thing pisses you off, just remembe there is a pretty good chance that you are "earning your money" the same way.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:As technology continues to save labor... by Oil_Tan · · Score: 1

      KPACHbIÉ OKTIABR Nyet commrade

  48. Your off hours are for stress relief by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    ... playing solitaire (or other games) may provide workers with a way to burn off some stress ...

    Relieving stress? That's what breaks, lunch, workday evenings, weekends, holidays, and vacations are for.

    1. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by dauthur · · Score: 1

      Well not everyone has the ability to take a vacation, holiday, or weekend... and most breaks that I've had ended up with me buying lunch, sitting down for 2 seconds, and having to sprint back to work within the 15 minute allotted time.

      Is there any law prohibiting beer in the work place? I'm sure I can relieve some stress that way, as well as a brain-cell or two.

    2. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Well not everyone has the ability to take a vacation, holiday, or weekend...

      And the intersection of that population with the population that has access to a computer and can casually sit around playing solitaire without being noticed is how close to zero?

    3. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by orin · · Score: 1

      The reason that high school and university classes are of a certain length is that it has been found that most people can't concentrate on a particular thing for more than about 1.5 hours. After you reach that limit your productivity decreases rapidly.

      Most people need some form of regular distraction. Once they have this "reset" they go back to being a lot more productive.

    4. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      The reason that high school and university classes are of a certain length is that it has been found that most people can't concentrate on a particular thing for more than about 1.5 hours. After you reach that limit your productivity decreases rapidly. Most people need some form of regular distraction. Once they have this "reset" they go back to being a lot more productive.

      And that is why the "standard" 8-hour day is broken into four two-hour segments by two breaks and a lunch. Sorry, most desk jockeys f-off because they can not because they need to in order to maximize productivity.

    5. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I can't think of any job where you work 7 days a week, all day every day, with no days off at all, and only a 15 minute dinner break. Even slaves on plantations had it better than that. Perhaps you should find a better job.

    6. Re:Your off hours are for stress relief by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Informative

      FWIW in certain jurisdiction law enforcement is considered "on duty" at all times, hence the requirement to carry concealed weapons when not "at work". They do have days off and vacations and are free to leave the jurisdiction.

  49. Path to profit? by shanen · · Score: 1
    Actually, the interesting problem underlying all of these problems with computer games starts from something we'd all agree with: Everyone agrees that time is the most precious resource, and everyone wants more time. So if time is so valuable, why are computer games so popular? Computer games simply kill time in a painless fashion.
    1. Write computer game.
    2. Game is popular, many people kill lots of valuable time.
    3. Profit!
    Something is wrong with this picture.
    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Path to profit? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Time is only precious insofar that what you do with that time makes you happy (or happier). For some, gaming can make them happy, whether through the challenge, or just escaping the rest of their miserable, depressing lives.

    2. Re:Path to profit? by shanen · · Score: 1

      Are you attempting to rationalize and explain your own computer game playing. The *obvious* answer is that the problem is the miserable depressing life that should be constructively addressed, not run away from.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    3. Re:Path to profit? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      At first it was the latter, and now it's the former. I did exactly that. Regardless, however, that is the reason for gaming - and movie watching - and tv watching - and book reading. There are lots of hobbies that make you forget real-world problems for a period of time. Sometimes they're the only thing that keeps you sane.

      In the end, however, you have to deal with your problems. After that's done, you can focus on the former; the challenge, the adrenaline rush, the thrill of victory, the rage of defeat. It's not as fun as a game of tennis or roller blading, but in the winter, it's one of the most fun hobbies around.

  50. From John C. Dvorak.... by toygeek · · Score: 1

    "In all large corporations, there is a pervasive fear that someone, somewhere is having fun with a computer on company time. Networks help alleviate that fear."

  51. Boredom by ockegheim · · Score: 1
    "You have to ask yourself, if someone is so bored that playing solitaire is stimulating, then the problem is not with the game, it's with the job."

    Are some/most workers paid to be bored these days?

    --
    I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  52. The most important question by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 3, Interesting

    fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling."

    Are these IRS employees paying the full amount of the tax due on their gambling winnings? It is considered income, after all.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
    1. Re:The most important question by mrcrowbar · · Score: 1

      Are these IRS employees paying the full amount of the tax due on their gambling winnings? It is considered income, after all.

      What's worse is they are gambling with your tax refund! Oh no!

    2. Re:The most important question by magefile · · Score: 1

      That's OK. If they don't, Congress will.

  53. Doh... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    More hours =? more productivity?

    I know that it's bad to lose work time into games, but... really, what's worse? A worker who clears up his mind by playing sol 5 minutes, or a bored and tired worker who PRETENDS to be working but his productivity is actually half what it should be?

    Bureaucracy...

  54. government waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I once had a classmate in gradschool who had worked for the IRS for 10 years. He was the least competent individual in the class by far, and had the attitude of a real prick too, but for some reason we became friends (as he constantly needed help with his work, for one thing) and hung out until the end of the program.

    In class, the subject of people surfing the net at work, etc. came in class, and a scalding study naming the IRS as a huge offender was cited.

    This fellow vehemently denied that this type of activity took place, claiming that (in addition to being overworked) a large number of IRS employees were unable to use computers, let alone surf the net... Imagine that, a government agency with computer illiterate employees! Anyways, he went on to contradict himself by claiming that there was a real productivity problem, but instead of surfing the net, they were having wild sex in the boiler rooms.

    From watching him fight with his PC in class and go after really ugly women when we went for beers, it dawned on me that he might be telling the truth.

    To be honest, I'm not sure which bothers me more. If they were a competent organization full of digitally inclined workers, we'd probably all be suffering a lot more come tax time than we do when they're fucking away our tax dollars.

    So whats the moral of my story? You can't pay your taxes and expect the feds to do anything useful with them. Thank you and goodnight.

    1. Re:government waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that there was a real productivity problem, but instead of surfing the net, they were having wild sex in the boiler rooms.

      A way to put an end to that productivity problem is to take away free condoms.

  55. I'm not playing Solataire! by HockeyPuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not playing Solataire... I'm studying the Terrorism Deck of Cards...

    Looking for:

    M'Balz Es-Hari
    Graabir Boubi, and
    Haid D'Salaami
    Hous Bin Pharteen, his cousin I-Bin Pharteen, and their close companion I-Zheet M'Drurz

    Shaif Hirboush.. Al-Suq Akweer.. Mustaf Herod Apyur Poupr. I hope I got that right! Awan Afuqya.. Yul Strokheet Al-Wauch.. Apul Madeek - who we believe will be targeting adult bookstores sometime in the near future. And this man, the notorious Yuliqa M'Diq, A.K.A. Uwana M'Diq, A.K.A. Usuqa M'Diq. Uh.. thank you, that is all... [SNL]

  56. A scanner darkly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to mention, it's like, a communistical Union, not just one of those normal ones, the government ones are much worse.

    I agree with you on government man, it's such a whacked idea, I mean, who needs this damn telephone system, or an army, or the internet. They're such scums, always profligating our tax dollars, and what do we get in return? Word.

    I'd be much happier if we all worked for an efficient corporation too, like Kellogg Brown & Root, one with our best interests at heart. Damn communists that run our government won't let it happen though.

    1. Re:A scanner darkly by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Inefficient companies like KBR exist because of the government. It's the gov outsourcing their lack of productivity. There's not enough competition and too many political contributions to force KBR to be efficient.

      I think the government has done a lot of good things. But it's only 'efficient' compared to corporations when corporations would require massive redundancy of huge systems (Three internets? Three highway systems?) to foster competition.

      And yeah, gov. funding helps to develop new technologies. It takes a gov to make a phone system. But in situations where the government has to compete with several industries in competition with one another (say fedex vs. the post office) it's pretty consistently cheaper for the gov to farm out their work to the private (but not monopolitic) company.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  57. But Microsoft said by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that Solitare and Minesweeper are intergrated with the OS, and removing them can cripple the OS. This is the type of thing that happens at Microsoft, apparently. Microsoft says it would not be possible to make a version of Windows without the Solitare and Minesweeper applications.

    Ah well, if Solitare and Minesweeper are removed, what will stop government employees from installing other games?

    You boss, just wants to challenge you to a Doom 3 Deathmatch anyway. ;)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  58. You *want* them busy playing Solitaire! by billstewart · · Score: 4, Funny

    These are IRS employees. Almost none of them are ever doing anything you want them to be doing, except occasionally the people who change the ink cartridges on the refund-check-printing machines. The more time they spend playing solitaire, the better.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  59. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ahh, memories...

    1995, I was a contractor at an unnamed nuclear powerplant in Maryland. Windows 3.1 and all the BSD's we could stand. Solitaire was all the rage, and Management caught on.

    One day the Solitaire shortcut doesn't work anymore, and a memo is circulated that "Game playing is bad...waste of resources...disciplinary action..." Stopepd us in our tracks? No (I mean, we are engineers for Chrissake)

    Look for Sol.exe on machine...gone.
    Search for "Solitaire" in shared drive...hmmm...that looks like some kind of script file in the root of the Network G: drive. Open it up - so it is: it checks user's machine at login and erases sol.exe. There is also a log in the directory: every instance of Solitaire being played on machines connected to that network for the last couple of months.

    Solution to problem #1: reinstall Sol.exe, rename sol1.exe. No more logging.

    Fun with the existing log:

    "Hey Frank! (da boss)"
    "What"
    "You were playing Solitaire at exactly 1425 on March 3."
    "Uh, how would you know that?"
    "Big Brother is watching, Frank."

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  60. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

    Are you from outside the USA?

    Here in the US, you don't need any official policy.

    The law allows employers to fire someone for any non-illegal reason or for no reason at all. It is called "at will".

    Only illegal reasons are discrimination against people in legally recognized "protected classes", or "whistle blowing" for gov't employees.

    Even illegal reasons won't cause a boss to get in trouble unless one can prove the illegal reason was why one was fired.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  61. Solitaire and Boring Phone Calls by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you ban solitaire, you'll need to ban boring phone calls as well.

    For some people, it's more critical - my department used to have a secretary who played solitaire a lot. Her most important jobs were to keep track of the managers' appointments and answer their phones, and when she'd done any available paperwork, "answering their phones" meant "sitting around being bored", occasionally interrupted by people calling.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  62. I vote for even more games! by mrcrowbar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let the IRS play all the games they want. The more games they play the less time they have to audit me.

  63. What are "gambing winnings"? by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's really not the purpose of online gambling websites. In real casinos, you need to have some people winning to generate enough excitement to keep the other suckers busy losing, but in online casinos, that doesn't happen, so you only need to let the suckers win often enough to keep them steadily losing money while they hope for the next big win. And gambling losses are only deductable up to the amount of your winnings.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:What are "gambing winnings"? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      They might be playing poker, which some people really do for a profit.

      --
      -Dave
  64. As an employee of the State of NC... by jschroering · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can safely say that I don't think this would fix anything. People are creative. If it's not solitaire, it -will- be something else. I read one comment that said something along the lines of 'once you're in [state gov't], you actually have to TRY and get fired'. I believe that too. I know quite a few people that could be more way more productive than they currently are. But it's not just the games. It's the phone, or the email, or the internet, or the conversations in the hall. Passing this bill will only make people spend more time doing those other things. Jimmy

    1. Re:As an employee of the State of NC... by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      Or the business that they're running on the side.

      If government were run like a normal business, the way to keep goofing-off down would be to implement a "Do your work on time or get fired" policy (or at least a "Don't do your work on time and don't get a raise" policy.) But, firing gov't employees never happens and all their raises are set en masse by the legislature.

      After a 13-year haitus from formal education, I'm in Law School where there is a debate about whether students should be allowed to use their laptops in class -- professors complain of non-class related usage. But, I see no difference from when I was in school and loafers just sat in the back row and read the newspaper.

    2. Re:As an employee of the State of NC... by jschroering · · Score: 1

      Good point. Since you brought up raises...state employees of NC received their first raise (this excludes teachers, they've gotten more money in the last three years than anyone - not saying they don't necessarily deserve it) in 3 years last year. We got 2.5% or $1000, whichever was greater. Prior to that, we got -nothing-. No cost of living, nothing. Maybe if they rewarded people better, productivity would increase. And I'm not talking about reward as in 'good job'. That helps, but you can't take that to the bank or pay your mortgage with it.
      Jimmy

  65. Eliminate all slack time. by srobert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In any work environment, whether private sector or public, there is slack time. What would be the macro-economic impact of eliminating all that slack time from the workplace? Mass unemployment? Cheaper goods and services? A shorter workweek?
    What would be the impact on the distribution of wealth?. What would be the impact on the quality of life, considering that most of us have to go to work most of the days of our lives?
    You agreed to pay me such and such an amount to do such and such each week. Now you find out that I can do it in ten hours, when you thought that it would take me 40, so you want to punish me by reducing me to 10 hours pay? You just eliminated any incentive I had to be efficient.

    1. Re:Eliminate all slack time. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Eliminate slack time in most fields that requires a lot of creativity or problem solving, and you'll end up with a group of unproductive people.

      Slacking off == productivity. Obviously, there are certain limits to this. If you spend all day slacking off, your not going to get much done.

    2. Re:Eliminate all slack time. by ect5150 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how the job market is, doesn't it? A lot of areas in NC have a lightly higher unemployment rate compared to the rest of the US. Maybe the incentive here is to keep your job instead of giving it to someone else who is willing to do it at the rate requested by the employeer.

      There are far many more issues dealing with the situation that what are being brought forth from the somewhat one-sided arguments from the posters here on /.

      That said, maybe I shouldn't be posting at work ;)

      --
      I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
  66. Mandatory Microsoft Monopoly Post by spaceturtle · · Score: 1

    The Government is banning their employees from playing Solitaire? What next, Microsoft banning Monopoly? Sheesh! ;)

  67. So by KidSock · · Score: 1

    Before you pooh pooh this ask yourself if playing another game like say Grand Theft Auto should be banned on State owned computers. If so, what's the difference between playing GTA and Solitare on company time?

  68. Thus they should all have MSCE.. by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 0, Troll

    as every one knows that MSCE = Minesweeper Solitare Certified Expert

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
  69. True Story by telemonster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check this out,

    Setting is a place I used to work at, a gov't place. We were contractors installing and administrating the network and servers.

    A coworker and myself had to go to the 2nd floor of this other building, to fix one of the fiber optic drops (They ran 10mbps fiber to the desktop, we had to remove the included Intel 10/100 NICs and replace them with $400 10baseFL nics).

    We came in, everything was call. But we had forgotten a tool. The workers were mostly quiet, as the cubes didn't allow us to see them. The old barrick buildings turned offices had a spacious and hollow feel on the 2nd floors. It was my coworkers turn to go get the piece or part we had forgotten. So hung tight as my coworker left.

    The minute the door shut and his footsteps were heard thumping down the stairs, I could hear the mouse clicks increase. Immediately I could hear the Space Cadet pinball game from multiple computers. It was fairly funny. As my coworkers footsteps were heard coming up the stairs, all of the game noises went away as the games were minimized.

    I said really loudly "DOUDE, you MISSED ALL THE ACTION"

    Many gov't jobs = welfare/wealth redistribution.

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
  70. Incompetent admins by kmeister62 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It all boils down to incompitent admins. Simple to remove all games from Windows systems. The process takes a few minutes when the machine is delivered. One nice thing about Windows Group Policy objects, you can enforce security policies where they can't be changed. You can also rescan machines as they log onto the network and re-apply the policy if the tech savy person manages to circumvent it.

  71. Clean Sweep by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Following their success boosting productivity by banning brooms...

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  72. Solitare reporting by telemonster · · Score: 1

    I've always wished solitare could report minutes spent with the mouse moving cards. Can you imagine having a statistic for the enterprise for amount of active solitare games / hours spent playing?

    --
    Southeastern Virginia REPRESENT!
    1. Re:Solitare reporting by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

      That gives me a cunning idea.. re-write a solitaire clone and distribute it on all your companies machines, have it produce such a statistic and send it to a server, keeping the employee's name tied to each statistic is optional depending on local privacy laws and how much fun you want to have..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Solitare reporting by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Systems Management Server provides the ability to monitor exactly which users are using which executables, on what dates. It'll even present this info in an easty-to-read report. It works on hashes of the .exe's, so a user who thinks he's being clever by renaming sol.exe to sol1.exe will still be monitored.
      Perhaps the best solution to excess "wasted" time, rather than trying to stamp out games altogether, is simply monitor everyone's game program use and make the results public. When there's a rush and the general workload is higher than normal, nobody will want to be the slacker who's been the at the top of the "Top 10 game players" in the department for 3 weeks in a row. I've heard of companies that take this approach with non-work-related web browsing, and have reported positive results.

    3. Re:Solitare reporting by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      sounds like a good idea to me, but what happens if you simply modify the solitare binary and change one byte to throw the hash then rename it to important_work_related_app.exe?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  73. My real-world experience on this topic by lowe0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before: users spend x hours playing solitaire.

    After: users spend x hours trying to get solitaire working again.

    All my management courses drilled into my head the idea that you can only expect six hours of productivity from an employee per day. I don't see any point in fighting it. Why piss them off in the process?

  74. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by joeljkp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Maybe in the private sector, but in government (as the article discusses), it is extremely hard to get someone fired. Hearings, evidence, the prying eyes of watchdog groups...

    Some people call it government waste, others call it job security.

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
  75. Another joke by roesti · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q. How many people work at Your Government Department?
    A. About a third.

  76. If it's not on the desktop... by Parsa · · Score: 4, Funny
    I work for a government agency and we don't bother removing the default games with Windows. If the program isn't on the desktop then the users don't think it's installed in the first place.

    J

    --
    Abiit, excessit, evasit, erupit.
  77. DONOT USEPC by ManyLostPackets · · Score: 1

    Obligatory Neal Stephenson reference ...

    Sure, the solitaire cipher has a bias, but it's still good enough to keep your little black book interesting.
    (that and paper doesn't crash)

    Seriously, though, it would be funny if all the gov. office drones started bringing a deck of cards to work and leaving them in plain site :-D

  78. Text of the bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is available here. This part is especially interesting:
    143-743. Restrictions on certain information technology [...] (a) The head of each State agency shall not accept delivery of information technology that is loaded with game programs not required for an official purpose under the terms of the contract under which information technology is delivered.
    In other words, if it ships with MS Windows containing MS Solitaire, send it back.
  79. But Solitare, like IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is an integral part of the OS.

    You can't remove it, just like you can't remove the web browser.

  80. Typical government workers by mikehilly · · Score: 1

    We do random scans at work and any given time about 5-10% of active machines on the network have the solitare service running. :-) Not going to divulge which branch, but probably all are about the same.

  81. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by Penguinshit · · Score: 1


    The "no games" policy should be followed by removal of said games from all systems, followed by removal of local administrator access for users, followed by group policy enforced at the PDC.

    Come to think of it, you should already have the last two in place to begin with.

  82. Try before you buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my biggest beefs with the music industry has been that you can't actually listen to enough of it, or listen long enough to decide if you want to buy it. 30 second high compression previews aren't good enough. Albums are also too expensive for what you get now. I think this will be a great service once a flash player comes out that works with the Janus DRM. I can preview tracks for days and decide if I like it enough to go buy it. Right now I buy all my music from a used CD store, rip them to Apple Lossless and sell them back to the store. This makes the price I pay more fair for what I am buying. The store keeps $5-6 of my money and keeps the original CD. The biggest problem has been shelling out the cost on CD's I don't know if I want to keep. Once a flash player comes out I can download a few albums and listen to them for a week or so from the flash player and then go shell out the $5-9 bucks for the used album if I like it. If you just think of it as Sat or Internet radio that you setup yourself, pick the songs and take anywhere, the $14.99 a month isn't so bad. Sure, it's not a long term solution to owning the music, but it's better than trying to find the good tracks on Limewire to try out for a while before you go buy and rip your lossless audio tracks.

  83. Online gambling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the IRS say that online gambling is illegal? Or is it another arm of the gov't...

    1. Re:Online gambling? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty sure its just the Federal Wire Act, and even thats somewhat a grey area on legality.

      The IRS, well so far as I know, they just want your money whether you be crack dealer, bookie, or online gambler. I'm pretty sure its set up so they wont report you to other arms of govt.

  84. Re:Duh!!: other side of the coin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The other way to look at this is that they are employing knowledgable people. If all government and businesses (read: humans) ran 100% efficient, then there would be like 20 jobs for any particular place. Having the 50% employed means that money can dynamically recirculate rather than stagnate for the 1% that can get employment. I am proud my tax-dollars are paying for this.

    Imagine the headline: the IRS laid off half its workforce today and riots ensued. Plans are under way to ship up to 40 % of the remaining jobs to India.

  85. Goverment Employment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You don't have any idea what you're talking about. Complete and utter FUD.

    Contrary to popular belief, government employees are not lazy do-nothings. I'm a US government employee, work in IT, and have worked for Uncle Sam since the end of last summer. My co-workers are some of the most hardworking, dedicated people I've had the pleasure to work with in my 10+ year IT career.

    You find shirkers in any organization: corporate, government, and military. All federal employees have performance standards that they are required to meet. We've just gone through a massive revision in how our performance is measured. If you don't meet your standards you're put on a performance improvement plan. If your performance continues to be sub-par then you're demoted or can be dismissed from service. Shirkers will be shown the door.

    Unlike the corporate world we have due process. We do have a union to protect worker rights and pay union dues. I think all employees - government and corporate - should have protections in place against discrimination and dismissal without cause. If you're a shirker you can shape up or ship out.

    I was the chief IT officer for a fast-growing company before I went to work for the government. I took a big paycut and a couple of steps down the ladder because I found the work and the organization fascinating.

    You may or may not agree with an organization's mission but that hardly makes it a scam. Frankly, I don't really care whether you do or not. It's not just your tax dollars at work, it's mine too. I not only have an interest in ensuring that my tax dollars are spent responsibly, I have a duty to ensure that they are.

    We have an enormous amount of oversight, cross every t and dot every i to ensure that tax dollars are spent appropriately. Misappropriation is a serious crime and federal agencies are regularly audited to ensure that these funds are spent appropriately.

  86. thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god they are playing! Would you rather have them manually review more claims?
    Even if all of your deductions are legit, do you have receipts for all of them and how many years back?

  87. Manchurian Candidate by woodsrunner · · Score: 1

    If you have seen the Manchurian Candidate IMDB, you know why Solitaire is standard install, don't you Raymond... I don't get out of my cell much, did they use the Win version in the Remake of the movie?

  88. Boss Keys by WMD_88 · · Score: 1
    My dad has/had this Tetris clone from around 1988/89. When you pushed Escape, the screen turned into a spreadsheet filled with numbers. You could even scroll through it with PgUp/PgDn.

    Come to think of it, the real Tetris did this too, but with a more intelligent-looking spreadsheet.

    Does sol.exe do anything like this? I doubt it. And MS is probably too scared to put it in (productivity lawsuits).

  89. Not necessarily bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I'll be the first to admit that sometimes people take advantage of things and go too far in being irresponsible, I have to say one thing:

    It is actually good if one is able to take a break every so often in order to rest one's mind. It actually helps productivity (as long as they remain judicious and can go back to work after a few minutes break).

    For a little background, I am in a scientific field where reading volumes and volumes of material makes up everyday life. I have come to realize that it is impossible for someone to be fully productive without taking a break of a few minutes every hour or so.

    In other words, don't micro-manage. Judge not by what an employee uses as an aside, but by whether or not they actually get the job done.

    Innovative managers and institutions tend to understand this a little better.

  90. The IRS and Games by Grech · · Score: 1
    I would be highly skeptical of the one-off line about the IRS and mis-used computing time. IRS workstations are loaded with one version or another of the COE, or Common Operating Environment. This is a custom version of one of a couple versions of Windows, along with a stack of over-expensive applications. Highlights include:

    • Adobe Acrobat
    • Accessory Manager
    • Microsoft Office
    • Hummingbird Exceed
    • Stop OnDemand
    Anything that doesn't seem needful gets removed, most especially including games.

    As an aside, OpenOffice was considered for use in the COE, and was rejected based on a Gartner study that said it would be more expensive to use, as psychotic as that sounds, and I know who has the paperwork to prove it.

    --
    It may not be just, but it is fair, and that is more important.
  91. Microsoft Windows XP NoSol by donkstuff · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time for MS to remove solitare, and sell it as a stripped down version of XP for buisnesses and state/federal employees to use.

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    Paluminum.net
    1. Re:Microsoft Windows XP NoSol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if they can charge twice as much, since it's the government that's buying it

  92. Solution by Infinityis · · Score: 1

    Solution: smaller games. No need to have so many pixels for such a simple game as solitaire. Unfortunately, Windows doesn't like making the cards very small....That's another victory for Linux, what with scalable vector graphics such as those found in Gnome

  93. Not going to stop anything.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In these days where I get a call in the middle of the night to disable x part of the system while they run Y process or when I get called Saturday morning because Z office can't print, if I take a 1/2 hour to check out things on the web on Slashdot or whatever....that makes up for all those 10-15 minute things I get asked to do after hours. If I end up dialing in and working on something for 2-3 hours in the middle of the night or on the weekend, I tell the boss, hey I am taking off early because I did this and he says sure. I am flexible....the company beter be to. If I have to leave early to go to my kids soccer practice or to watch his game but you need me to do X at 2 am....well, you better be cool with me leaving for the soccer game. Having unlimited net access and the ability to install programs not sanctioned or supported by our PC/Network support lets me get my job done or lets me cool my jets before tapping off that nasty e-mail to the idiot who can't unjam his own printer. Talk to the idiots I constantly have to go spoon feed and get them to work better and I may have more time to do real work.

    Also, you want me to do remote support, BUY ME A LAPTOP. I spent my hard earned money on my machines, they are NOT to be used for my work. It's not like I am a independent contractor and have to pay for my own stuff. Oh and don't complain if I have images or other non work software on it either. You want me to do the support and take it home, then you better let me do what I want to do with it, within reason of course. You have my promise there will be no kiddie porn on it too. Start getting uppity and my laptop and my cell phone just may not make it with me on my next business trip.

    There's no way you, the manager, does work all 8 of those hours either. IN fact, most managers are worse than employees or at least the same. Managers are constantly checking the stocks and the damn NCAA tourney or planning their next "business" trip to Las Vegas...shyeah. Take it easy on the employees, and when you really need them to do that extra 8 hours on Saturday, they just might say sure, I had nothing planned.

    --

    Gorkman

  94. Unintended consequences by wk633 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Some people aren't paid by how much the do, but being there to do what needs to be done, when it needs to be done.

    e.g. Firemen.

    Granted, firemen are usually municipal not state workers. But they have lots of goof-off activities at the station to fight boredom.

    Gee, nothing else to do since they took our T.V. and foosball away. Let's wash the shiny trucks AGAIN!

    1. Re:Unintended consequences by Beeswarm · · Score: 1

      My father is a fireman, and the county sprung for a DirecTV dish at the firehouse. They know what a firefighter does most of the day, which is fight off boredom.

  95. No, 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you mean to say is a 50% reduction in their workforce is required.

    Which means they are overstaffed by 100%.

  96. ManHours != WorkDone by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Face it, that time you're SMSing your wife and doing crossword puzzles is time you're stealing from your employer.

    As a manager, I have a lot of light to shed on this subject.

    Essentially, every time we call in an "efficiency expert" who advises us to cut back on the number of breaks employees get, I shrug it off. An employer with any experience at all knows better than to count productivity simply in "man-hours." Man-hours of work are little more than a theory figure for comparison purposes, but they don't have any real value. When I try to weigh employee productivity, my equation isn't simply "ManHoursWorked/ManHoursPossible". It's something more like "ManHoursWorked*WorkDonePerHour/WorkDonePossible".

    Of course, the real equation isn't THAT simple either, but it does say a lot. If I'm a fun-nazi to all my employees, all it does is create general resentment toward both myself and the job. Unhappy employees have a MUCH larger tendancy to do poorly at work, and slack off even more when I'm not watching. On the other hand, if I'm somewhat lenient about my policy, letting my employees take breaks when they feel it's necessary, they're happy and tend to get more work done in the time they work. End result, I have more more work done at the end of the day. (Which of course makes my salary go up every couple years, so it works out well for me too.) If someone tells me that my employees are "stealing" time from me, I laugh and don't worry about it, because the time they DO put in is much more valuable.

  97. Hell, I'll tell you what you NEED to be doing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loading up all the machines with Splinter Cell.

    This entire nation is headed for a fucking revolution, and people are going to need to know how to snipe and use retinal scanners to protect themselves.

    Viva los Pepes!!

  98. It's Welfare by Art+Tatum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It has for some time been obvious to me that government bureaucracy is the *real* welfare program in America. It's a jobs program for people who can't get work in the private sector.

  99. Ahhh NC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The politicions who were to stupid for Washington, all end up in Raleigh.

  100. IRS spending time playing games -- a good thing?! by intnsred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My favorite bit (especially as April 15th draws ever closer) is where the author notes that fifty percent of the time an IRS employee is on the computer they are playing games, shopping online or gambling.

    Isn't that a good thing?!

    Considering that the IRS is far more likely to investigate/harass poor or average-income taxpayers as opposed to the rich, I see them wasting their time as a plus.

    Now, if we could only spread this idle time-wasting idea to the Pentagon, maybe Iraqis and other people who are under the thumb of the empire could breath a little easier...

  101. Gaming Eh......yeah right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nawww! C'mon slashdotters, you KNOW what those tax chaps are doin, eh mates? Why to a man they are downloading all the sex pix of Paris Hilton that they can find. After all, those apes are'nt goin to fall far from the tree what with screwin the public as a career choice for their favorite 24/7 activity. I bet that porn will figure largely in their downloads and other online activity, with S and M being the largest single category of download with all dur respect to Paris, the livin Barbie Doll of the new age. Think about it!

  102. Would it be legal to log... by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

    how many games each employee won and lost?

    --
    Tag lost or not installed.
  103. Got it all wrong by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps Solitaire is a blessing. Imagine if instead the IRS had nothing to do. They might get bored and start doing an audit on YOU!

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Got it all wrong by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps Solitaire is a blessing. Imagine if instead the IRS had nothing to do. They might get bored and start doing an audit on YOU!

      Wait a sec... isn't that supposed to be: "In Soviet Russia, the IRS audits YOU"? Or do you audit them over there? I'm confused!

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Got it all wrong by grosmarcel · · Score: 1

      Some should consider inciting people who makes driving licence to play to such games : that could occupy them and there will be less time given to them to think about selling false licence to terrorists...

    3. Re:Got it all wrong by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

      I think I can help.

      It goes:

      1. In Soviet Russia, the IRS audits YOU.
      2. You audit them.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      I feel dirty.

      Mark

      PS 5. Hot grits.

      --
      Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  104. Only got in trouble once... by Clark_Griswold · · Score: 1


    And that was for playing strip solitaire at work.

    --
    -- Mace only makes me hornier.
  105. People aren't robots.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People can't be expected to sit there hours
    on end, day in and day out processing paperwork,
    without some sort of "microbreaks" during the
    day. And before the outsourcing morons jump
    up and boom "we'll ship their jobs off to India,
    they are cheaper AND more productive", the same thing probaly happens over there too.

    Take their games, SMS, brooms or whatever
    away, and they will just idle some other way.

  106. Re:IRS spending time playing games -- a good thing by Technician · · Score: 1

    Now, if we could only spread this idle time-wasting idea to the Pentagon, maybe Iraqis and other people who are under the thumb of the empire could breath a little easier...


    And people who work in tall buildings get more stressed out.

    These people failed their first attempt and came back years later to try again on 9-11. Maybe we should make them sweat a little so we can breath a little easier.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  107. You can't remove minesweeper! by marble · · Score: 1

    It's an integral part of the operating system! How else are Microsoft going to crush those iD Software guys if they're not bundling their own games in for free with the OS?

  108. there are two aspects of the problem ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    First, the fact that people who 'hardly working' will always find something to do rather than work. Before PCs (so there was a terminal connected to a mainframe), I saw those 'cobol programmers' reading newspaper. After PCs (but before Internect connectivity), I saw the same cobol programmers playing solitaire, and finally after internet connectivity, the same cobol programmers happily surfing the web. I don't think taking away internet connectivity, or even taking away the PC won't change anything.

    Second, government employees. That's thet's tough nut to crack. I've been working as a state employee for a few years, and what I've learned - if you do something, you may get some criticism for doing something rather than something else, or for doing it badly. BUT - if you are doing *nothing*, it's very difficult to make a case against you. I was working in the agency which collects contribution to unemployment fund, from employers. Collection takes place 4 times a year, and lasts for about a month, that's the period of fairly high activity. The rest of the time there is very little to do. again, I'm not sure that blocking the internet access, removing solitaire game from the PC or even taking away the PC will change anything. The'll be gossiping, talking on a phone, whatever ... and that's the nature of lots of govenment and state agencies. it's fairly easy to avoid doing *any* work. The real problem is not to get to bored and find the way to entertain yourself. (what I did was hiding somewhere between the file cabinets and reading the books on computer science.)

    So the bottom line: it's not Internet fault, and it's not PC fault. it's the people or working environment or both.

  109. It's like, an addiction for our state by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

    Hailing from NC, I can definitely say people around here have some huge addiction to Solitaire. Now I realize in the grand scheme of the globe it's probably ya know, not isolated to my state or town but they seem to go out of their way in schools, and businesses to "fight" this problem. Day 1 of "Computer Literacy" back in HS the first thing we were "taught" was never to play Solitaire or other games during school hours. Of course, HS aged kids and such are gonna do the opposite. But the system admin went as far as disabling right click and windows key so you couldn't back door the .exe o_O In college orientation, one of the first rules for computer labs and the campus library was do not play solitare or other games. Now this was a tad of a step up since ya know you're paying THEM to attend their school. (but thats a different debate for a different time). And then any job just abou around here is very strict on any computer related activity. A family member of mine works for a local hospital doing patient billings in the accounting department (which isn't even located anywhere near the hospital itself) and they are allowed to recieve email, but cannot under any circumstances even in life or death situations email someone outside the office building. This is considered a violation of company policy and as such can have termination be warranted. The same goes for playing Solitaire or Minesweeper.... Now what I don't get is, A] why don't system admins just remove the damn games? AFAIK they've been built into Windows accesories since Windows 95 which can be disabled on machines one by one or through the network. and B] what is it with peoples obsession with these? I mean god I know what it's like to be bored out of my mind to the point I'd fall asleep. But if it ment risking my job or education over a game of Solitaire? It's almost as bad as college kids addicted to AIM or ICQ. I can understand using them, and their use cause I've used them myself. But when you know it can cost you (a job, a class, a semester..), why continue?

    --
    Aw Frell this
  110. Re:IRS spending time playing games -- a good thing by Jazzinjake · · Score: 1
    if we could only spread this idle time-wasting idea to the Pentagon, maybe Iraqis and other people who are under the thumb of the empire could breath a little easier...

    Pilot: Uhh... commander... did you say 39 kilometers or 39 miles?
    Air strike commander: Where's that jack... Oh! Ahem, y'know, somewhere around there. You can figure it out.

    *If only more solitaire equalled less killing...

  111. And then flash games...? by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 1

    I know how people work and I can safely say that I bet that the majority of those people aren't playing just Solitare and Minesweeper in their free time -- they are also playing flash games. Even in school, no one really cares about or plays Solitare anymore. It's easy to find a ton of cool and fun games to play through a lot of free flash game sites. And if they are not doing that, then I bet they have their own game to install and play. One way or another, the only way to actually "ban gameplay" is to add it to the list of rules for your job, if it isn't there already. No point in banning game play, because people will find a way to do it one way or another. So do you honestly think they will lock the computers down so tight that they can only visit certain websites and install a few things? No idea if they will for all of those computers, but my best guess is no. People are lazy.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  112. I'm still pissed... by Zorilla · · Score: 1

    ...that after NT4, Windows stopped including QBasic and the best game in the world, Gorillas, which ran under it.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  113. Re:IRS spending time playing games -- a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These people failed their first attempt and came back years later to try again on 9-11.

    As I recall, the gov't claims it was a blind Egyptian cleric who -- in conjunction with the FBI -- was responsible for the first bomb in the basement of the WTC in the early 1990s.

    For 9-11 the gov't claims that its former CIA agent Bin Laden was responsible for the attack. Those aren't "these people", that is two entirely different groups.

    We should also note that, the gov't only "claims" Bin Laden was responsible. If you recall, the publicly-proven liar Condi Rice promised after 9-11 that she and the gov't would produce evidence to prove Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks of 9-11, but the gov't has never provided any such evidence.

    And who cares about the attack that really terrorized the US -- the anthrax attacks. Nobody talks about those attacks which gripped the entire nation in fear for a solid month. The only thing we know about the anthrax attacks is that the attack was done using a strain of anthrax that the US military was experimenting with and that the anthrax was highly weaponized into an aerosol that even Iraq could not have produced in its WMD heyday.

  114. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by tbone1 · · Score: 1
    • Maybe in the private sector, but in government (as the article discusses), it is extremely hard to get someone fired. Hearings, evidence, the prying eyes of watchdog groups...

    After two+ years in DC at a well-known space agency which shall remain nameless, I believe that you can't remove government workers with nuclear weaponry and a backhoe. I was there as a contractor during the shutdown of 95-96, and when the civil servants were gone, we got a ton more work done.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  115. Solatiare on NC owned machines by ardyer · · Score: 1

    I can say as a State employee of North Carolina, Solatire was removed from the machines where I work a long time ago.

  116. Not All IRS Employees by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Some of us have the coveted job of taking all the data on paper tax forms and typing it into the computers. I assure you, none of us in data entry have time to make a phone call, let alone play solitaire. I'm hoping for another dot com bubble so I can get a salary job playing air hockey.

  117. Looks like the old joke by neves · · Score: 2, Funny

    This remembers me of an old joke.

  118. Solitaire-surprise ally by CharlieD · · Score: 1

    I was having major problems with my office H/W and had called the help(?) desk to no avail. I knew something was hosed internally. When the fix-it person showed, he/she fiddled around and generally did not believe me when I described the problem.

    Finally, I left the room in disgust, only to return when I heard the loud comment: "You can't even play solitaire on this machine!!!!"

    Needless to say, fixit person became a believer and replaced the hard drive + who knows what else.

    One good reason to have solitaire on your machine is that EVERYONE KNOWS WHAT IT IS SUPPOSED TO DO. When it doesn't, even the skeptics have to admit something is wrong.

  119. 50% non-work activities by raider_red · · Score: 1

    If fifty percent of the time is devoted to non-work activities, we just need to follow the logical course and lay off fifty percent of the government workforce. That way, we can normalize the workload with the number of resources. Alternatively, we can fire all of them, and hire some people with a good work ethic.

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
  120. sol.exe by danheretic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the management at my old job where I was sysadmin for a small company tried to ban Solitaire because it was, indeed, seeing a lot of use during working hours. They commanded me to uninstall Solitaire on all machines; I did. Unfortunately what they did not realize was that sol.exe fits on a floppy disk, and people would bring it in their own sol.exe from their own Windows computers to play it. Nowadays they'd bring it in on a USB drive, but the concept remains the same.

    1. Re:sol.exe by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Thats the most tragic story ive ever heard - you would think they would bring a better game than solitare if they were forced to make the effort of putting it on a disk!?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  121. Re:How can you 'ban' solitaire? Easy, fire employe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, seems simple enough but it ain't.

    I work in the Personnel department at a quasi-government setup.

    We have shelves of people that anyone agrees SHOULD be fired, but they can't be. We just shuffle them around from assignment to assignment, and hopefully distribute the damage equitably rather than bringing one department to a halt.

    Last time I fired someone was for NOT showing up for work, bad conduct (telling people to fuck off on the phone), and misplacing crucial invoices on a regular basis (thus contractors weren't paid and pulled their services). It took a year of this behaviour before we could start the process, and then we needed 6 months of documented evidence.

    Followed by 3 meetings with the employee, 2 with the employee and the Union rep, and then about a 17" stack of documents which had to be cycled around through my office, a few other departments, and finally the Union before we were allowed to termiante her.

    And at that, we ended up giving her severance pay because it was just easier -- it would have almost doubled the length of the process to get everything pulled. And while we were going through all this, she still had her benefits, vacation, sick time, etc. (and used them to the max, I might add).

  122. Everybody Misses the real problem sooner or later by donak · · Score: 1

    They removed Freecell, Solitaire, Minesweeper etc. from our PCs (State Government in Australia) ... and no-one could play ... until the next round of hardware refresh, by which time they'd forgotten to bother.
    Meanwhile even the least geeky user found a copy of some old game, then brought it in on a floppy.

    --
    Don't blame me, it's usually 2 in the morning when I post ...
  123. Everyone who this story impacts, yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are not from the US, why do you care enough to speak up in a forum discussion on an American site about the US Internal Revenue Service?

    Honestly, if you have no idea what's special about April 15, you probably didn't know what IRS stood for until I just spelled it out, in which case, nothing being discussed here really has much of anything to do with you.

    1. Re:Everyone who this story impacts, yes. by wootest · · Score: 1

      The discussion was about people playing games at work when they're supposed to be working, and the people they work for taking action to prevent that. This article in particular refers to that of an american state.

      Even though my particular comment may have had nothing to do with people playing games at work, it's indeed a wide enough subject to warrant people who are not from, or living in, the US to discuss it. It's an american site alright, but that doesn't warrant totally dismissing people not familiar with April 15 in general (original poster, not me) on the grounds that they're stupid because they're not american, which seems to be what's happened, but on the grounds that they're off-topic.