Slashdot Mirror


Caltech Pranks MIT's Prefrosh Weekend

doughnuthole writes "Caltech students ventured to Massachusetts this past Wednesday to unleash a series of pranks at MIT's prefrosh weekend. They distributed shirts with MIT on the front and '...because not everyone can go to Caltech' on the back. They placed inflatable palm trees in the infamous Tomb of the Unknown Tool and around the great dome and floated Caltech balloons in building seven. A banner transformed Massachusetts Institute of Technology into That Other Institute of Technology. Saturday night a LASER spelling the letters C-A-L-T-E-C-H was directed at the top of the Green building. A full account of the pranks is located at www.caltechvsmit.com."

530 comments

  1. spelling? by Wizy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Being that caltech is so much better than MIT you would think that they could find a good spell checker...

    1. Re:spelling? by fuct_onion · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, they hand out shirts that say 'Because not everyone can go to Cal Tech.", yet:

      We inflated Palm trees and duct taped them to the edge of the wall in front of the dome, as well as in front of the library window, so that the cold, damp MIT students could at least get a glimpse of the paradise that would have awaited them in California.

      I thought they couldn't get in to Cal Tech(?).

  2. Who's Caltech, by the way? by unclocked · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who's Caltech, by the way?

    1. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Caltech and MIT.

      Oh, wait. Were you trying to be funny?

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by TummyX · · Score: 1, Funny

      Some oil company i think

    3. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, is some school in India that Dell uses to train their support monkeys.

    4. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Being just a dirty foreigner, the name "Caltech" doesn't ring a bell.

      On the other hand, I know about MIT damn well. When I've been to the ACM world finals, those bastards defeated my team (through pure luck, I'm sure). Two other our teams fixed that stain on honour later, of course.

      And Caltech... who's Caltech?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best theoretical college in physics and engineering. Best. In the world. Period.

      So has anyone done any experiments to determine whether or not this theoretical college exists?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    6. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Zorilla · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, the conventional way to preserve your dignity on Slashdot is to stop writing your corrective post when you realize the joke.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    7. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by 1iar_parad0x · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll give you a nobel prize for verifying its existence.

      --
      What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean my sig is repetitive? What do you mean....
    8. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Or an Ig ;-)

    9. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caltech is a top-level university that specializes in math, science, and engineering like MIT. Yeah, foreigners don't know about it as much as they know about MIT for some reason, but it is indeed a very difficult school and a formidable academic rival. And haha to the oil company joke. I remember having to explain to family overseas that I was not choosing to attend an oil company over MIT.

    10. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...dignity on Slashdot...

      You MUST be joking...

    11. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Funny
      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    12. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe they would be the Georgia Tech of the Left Coast.

    13. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      George P. Burdell? An AC? Well, I'll be dipped.

      rj

    14. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by burdalane · · Score: 2, Informative
      The California Institute of Technology, usually known as Caltech, is a very small school. I went there as an undergrad and did not like it, so I would not recommend it to prospective undergrads. I probably wouldn't recommend MIT, either, because from what I've heard, it shares some of Caltech's problems and has additional problems of its own. But Caltech does have a reputation as a top-notch and very tough math and science university. Caltech is usually ranked within the top 10 colleges in the United States by the US News and World Report, which is the US's most famous college ranking list, and was number one some 6 years ago, beating out MIT.

      As for the ACM World Finals, I think this year Caltech tied with MIT. Neither did particularly well. In previous years, sometimes Caltech beat MIT, and sometimes MIT beat Caltech. I don't recall the details.

    15. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      good lord.

      what major tech school would you recommend people go to instead?

      if you can get in to MIT or CalTech, you go. period.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    16. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a top technical school that isn't turning out just money-driven pricks or socially inept nerds, then you want a school that has strong liberal arts, business and humanities colleges.

    17. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Informative

      JPL, the guys who do lot of the satellite missions(voyager, galileo, etc) is staffed by both caltech employees and regular government employees.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    18. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a school that has strong liberal arts, business and humanities colleges.

      http://mitsloan.mit.edu/index-noflash.php
      http://web.mit.edu/shass/
      You mean like MIT?

    19. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To hell with Georgia! RR

    20. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Best theoretical college in physics and engineering.

      Obviously they do not teach (OR test for that matter) English or reading comprehension there.

    21. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Being just a dirty foreigner, the name "Caltech" doesn't ring a bell.

      By what logic do you say the name "Caltech" is just a dirty foreigner?

    22. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Colleges that produce lobster boy.

    23. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by janeil · · Score: 1

      Out of many claims to fame for CIT, here's a couple:

      Long ago, and maybe still, Caltech was the answer to the question "What university has the highest SAT average score for incoming freshmen?" I think in the early 70's (when we still did all mathematics without calculators, though they are cute little tools) that average was 1360-something.

      Caltech was also where Richard Feynman gave his collected lectures.

    24. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by burdalane · · Score: 1

      I guess I wouldn't recommend any major tech school. I was accepted by both MIT and Caltech, and I chose Caltech. Now I think I may have been better off choosing neither. Well, maybe, maybe not. I don't feel the effort required to get through Caltech was worthwhile. The only reasons I don't entirely regret going to Caltech have little to do with the quality of Caltech's tech education.

    25. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I kept on posting, too.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    26. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that has some small thing to do with the fact that Cal Tech is closer to the JPL lab (which is in LA) than MIT, which is in MA. It'd be a helluva commute for MIT employee's to work at JPL.

      Not that I know beans about either school, really. I just know where the JPL lab is.

      Bill

    27. Re:Who's Caltech, by the way? by Jakeypants · · Score: 1

      "Best theoretical college in physics and engineering. Best. In the world. Period."

      But their English department. Is sorely lacking. In teaching students about sentence fragments.

  3. Caltech to MIT: by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your freshmen are belong to us!!!
    1. Re:Caltech to MIT: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MIT traveling to CA to pull pranks on CIT would sort of be like starting to stroll past a bunch of paraplegics only to stop and challenge them to a dance competition.

    2. Re:Caltech to MIT: by Posterman · · Score: 1

      All your freshmen are belong to us!!! Actually, it would be: "All your pre-frosh are belong to us!!!"

  4. MIT Email by doughnuthole · · Score: 5, Funny

    The following email went out on the MIT hacking mailing list:
    >Someone apparently released a number of balloons in lobby 7 with
    >CalTech written on them. There is also a much larger Mylar Balloon
    >with C.I.T. My initial reaction, and the reaction of most people I
    >talked to was "C.I.T, what's that?"
    >
    >Several suggestions were made on what to do about this since if we do
    >nothing the balloons will float mockingly over lobby 7 for days:
    >
    >-Remove the balloons tonight (might be able to get a number of them
    >with a needle on a stick from the intersticial space).
    >
    >-release a second large mylar balloon that says "SUCKS"
    >
    >-Hack Caltech.
    >
    >one friend I talked to commented that she was friends with the moles,
    >the "legitamate" hackers at CalTech, and they claim to have no
    >knowledge of this and are busy with some other project. It would be
    >good if we could find out who did this. Could it have been an overzealous prefrosh?
    >
    >
    >As I said my initial reaction was "what is C.I.T? I have drafted an
    >article that I hope to send to the Tech Newspaper. Offering an
    >alternate explanation.
    >Comments, and suggestions are highly encouraged as this is a first draft.
    >
    >Amilio
    >amilio@alum.mit.edu
    >
    >
    >
    >>>proposed tech article follows below>>
    >
    >
    >C.I.T Looses BALLoonS
    >
    >The Center for Incompetent Technologies lost all of their display props
    >on the way to the activities midway today. Representatives from the
    >research group lost numerous small balloons and a larger one bearing
    >the group's acronym while crossing lobby 7, "We thought slip knots
    >would hold," said Ben Bitdiddle director of C.I.T.
    >
    >The Center for Incompetent Technologies is a newly formed nationwide
    >research group interested in developing ineffective, arcane, and
    >generally useless technologies. "So many companies and institutes are
    >focused on doing 'good research' and developing 'useful technologies'"
    >said Mr. Bitdiddle accenting his comments with air quotes, "we decided
    >there was an untapped niche market for useless technologies." The
    >group's motto is taken from an episode of The Simpsons: "Aim so low
    >that even if you succeed, no one will care"
    >
    >The smaller balloons were apparently leftover from numerous C.I.T
    >events at Caltech. The balloons were custom printed for the school
    >where the group is apparently very popular. Many of the poorly made
    >balloons have already popped and are littering the floor of lobby 7.
    >"We probably should have had some new customized balloons made, but if
    >we wanted to do things well, we wouldn't be CIT."
    >
    >The lost balloons were originally mistaken for a hack, but
    >representatives for the hacking community quickly corrected the error,
    >commenting "No, that was just a screw up, hacks are generally more
    >interesting and creative," Jack Florey.
    >
    >>>>>
    >

    1. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i guess spelling isn't a popular course


      intersticial
      legitamate
      C.I.T Looses


      i think ill stick with my current school thanks

    2. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The C.L.I.T. commander needs a speelchecker.

    3. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as one of the aforementioned moles, I would not say that we are the "legitimate" hackers on campus. Any hovse is welcome to undertake such a prank, though there is a traditional mistique about Blacker Hovse that we go pranking more than others, whether or not it's actually true. But to corroborate the previous claims, certainly there wasn't any talk of this about Blacker before hand, as this last weekend was the weekend of our Interhovse party.

    4. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seemed to mispell "legitamate" too.

    5. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think that was a very elegant way of reporting on the hack. Acknowledging Caltech, yet having some fun with it.

      Actually, as an MIT alum, I think most of the hacks and hack-backs were in fairly good taste.

      I'd say that I would consider the timing not quite the nicest. If I were in on such a prank, I would have advocated that they be done just before CPW, so that the story would be in the tech during CPW.

      I'd say that most were on the easy side, but that's not necessarily bad. For example, I think the T-shirts was by far the most elegant, and a worthy prank to start the rivalty.

      "The Other" banner was a bit lame (very easy, low quailty banner), but the CITers should get some allowances for doing it on a foreign campus. And the quick hack back ("The Only") was pretty good considering the time constraints.

      The redeaming aspect of the balloons was that they might have been hard to remove. Fortunately, the current MIT students rose to the challenge.

      I'm not quite clear on the laser on the green building and the safety concerns. So I'll reserve judgement there. Actually, lasers are a bit of a touchy issue at MIT, so the CITers are lucky that they didn't get in a some trouble for that one. Many of the campus police at MIT were former secret service, so there have been instances in which a laser pointer resulted in campus police tackling people (out of instinct) to protect them from snipers. Also, a previous prank attempt with a laser pointer got preempted by CPs due to safety concerns, so at least while I was at MIT, there was an informal agreement to avoid such pranks.

      Also, I'd be interested in hearing more about the attempted prank that was averted by the MIT students.

    6. Re:MIT Email by Smattacus · · Score: 4, Informative

      >one friend I talked to commented that she was friends with the moles,
      >the "legitamate" hackers at CalTech, and they claim to have no
      >knowledge of this and are busy with some other project

      Moles are nothing like the "Jacks" you have at MIT. Unlike whatever exclusive (and respectable, I'm sure) club there is for Pranksters at MIT, "Moles" means they live in Blacker Hovse. Blacker is a house, your equivalent of a dorm or a college. Granted they like building things, but trust me. The other thing they were working on that is referred to is their yearly get-drunk-and-get-laid-party, which was modeled after Escher paintings. Pretty cool, but pretty occupying. Pranksters at Caltech can be pretty much anyone; we do not need to be in a club to create things like this.

      Just trying to clear it up :-p

      Also, the general sentiment at Tech is that MIT is full of douchebags until they do something cool in return, rather than say how our pranks are not real hacks. I'm looking forward to see what happens.

      - Some Tech undergrad

      PS The REAL Tech.

    7. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You *do* realize that Jack Florey is a resident of 5th East (one floor in one dorm), right?
      Y'all keep calling the entire hacking community "Jack", but he's not even the only anonymous hacker, much less a generic term.

      Not so different after all...

    8. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this was a Blacker-specific prank, then, my god, the key troll has a wider reach than I ever _dreamed_!

    9. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Granted they like building things

      More cultural education. I was a Caltech undergrad and went to MIT for graduate school.

      A good friend of mine was a mole, sometime ago, and their reputation was for having good locksmiths, some of whom graduated up from the simple 1920's style locks on the four older houses to much more impressive Medeco locks that were going onto the newer buildings.

      Late night moles used to observe "pi time" to go out and get a late night snack. You can guess when and what they ate.

      Meanwhile, we Darbs had a tradition (beyond the druggie reputation) of "Blacker Theatre" night, using the west side of Blacker House as a screen for scruffy old porn flicks.

      Some of the most impressive Caltech hacks occur at the intramural level. The senior Ditch Day tradition brings out so much ingenuity in a single day that it's exhausting.

      Proper spelling is one word; it's "Caltech" not "Cal Tech". And, no one at Caltech referred to the school as "C.I.T.", just as no one at MIT referred to the school as "MassTech".

      Both schools have a long tradition of hacks. They both need it, too, as a means for bring some levity to an educational experience that is otherwise excruciating.

    10. Re:MIT Email by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Funny

      The other thing they were working on that is referred to is their yearly get-drunk-and-get-laid-party

      Any college student that only gets drunk and laid one time per year clearly has more than enough free time to plan and execute pranks like these.

    11. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PLEASE REMOVE THE PRIVATE EMAIL ADDRESS FROM THE ORIGINAL EMAIL. THANK YOU.

      This email was sent to a private list and should not have been forwarded.
      Please show a little courtesy.

    12. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody at MIT calls hackers "Jacks," FWIW. Jack Florey is the mascot of 5th east, a hall at the East Campus dorm. During the annual Orange and Tangerine tours, taking frosh/prefrosh to "illicit" areas of campus (mentioned on the caltechvsmit site), the tour guides all give their name as Jack so that a frosh/prefrosh caught by the CPs can't tell them who their guide was. So during the tours, they are called Jacks. The rest of the year, they're hackers with their very own names.

    13. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i guess spelling isn't a popular course
      ...
      i think ill stick with my current school thanks
      I'd suggest your school for spelling and that other school for grammar. You seem to be missing an apostrophe and a comma, as well as failing to distinguish between upper- and lower-case characters.
    14. Re:MIT Email by Aerion · · Score: 1

      "Jack" is not a term for hackers in general. I have no idea what you're talking about when you say there is a "club" for such things.

      It's clear our schools do not understand each other at all.

      -Some Tech undergrad

      PS The ONLY Tech.

    15. Re:MIT Email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, the shirt hack was monetarily sponsored by the Caltech administration. This not only goes against MIT hacking code of ethics, its also just plain cheap. Perhaps your hackers work to an easier standard? Also, a number of the hacks counted on the website are repeats, which the website specifically says to avoid.

      Its really funny that its the Caltech students who control the website, and not some independent party. Its also really funny that the Caltech hackers were clearly planning this in advance, without giving MIT hackers as much prior notice. Without giving MIT hackers proper time to respond, how can Caltech people already call us douchebags?

      I'd also like to say that quality is so much more important than quantity. Wright brother's airplane model. Police car on dome. Purchasable helium balloons? Purchasable shirts? Puh-leaze. Pranks, hardly hacks.

  5. Re:this is news ? by XanC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is news for nerds. If we don't keep up with the MIT / Cal Tech rivalry, who will??

  6. Sophomoric pranks by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Funny

    While I tend to understand the enthusiasm that each of these groups of students have towards their alma mater, I have to wonder if the Caltech kids are as smart as they think they are.

    I'd much rather stay in warm CA during April than go to MA. Invite the MIT whiz kids down and haze them in the relative comfort of your own hometown. For chrissakes, what fun is it to freeze your ass off over there?

    1. Re:Sophomoric pranks by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      Well, sunny weather gets old. And who doesn't like to travel?

    2. Re:Sophomoric pranks by Vagodin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dude, it was really fun. Definitely worth the plane flight. Also, the weather turned out to be pretty warm. Today was warm enough for shorts, t-shirts, and frisbee tossing. We'll be back in sunny CA soon enough, though, don't you worry!

    3. Re:Sophomoric pranks by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 5, Funny

      While I tend to understand the enthusiasm that each of these groups of students have towards their alma mater, I have to wonder if the Caltech kids are as smart as they think they are.

      I'd much rather stay in warm CA during April than go to MA. Invite the MIT whiz kids down and haze them in the relative comfort of your own hometown. For chrissakes, what fun is it to freeze your ass off over there?


      MIT has a weather machine. It's always warm and sunny on prefrosh weekend. This one was no exception.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    4. Re:Sophomoric pranks by LegoEvan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I suppose you don't know of the Campus Preview Weekend (CPW) myth. It has been beautiful weather for the last 10 or so CPWs, with nasty weather on either side. Rumor has it that the administration has a weather machine. Who really knows what that big round thing on top of the Green Building is anyway, considering it's illegal to go there.

    5. Re:Sophomoric pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a weather machine here at Caltech, too. It's never smoggy when prefrosh or the parents of prefrosh or parents are around...

    6. Re:Sophomoric pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear it has an endless supply of hot air.

    7. Re:Sophomoric pranks by Aerion · · Score: 1

      Who really knows what that big round thing on top of the Green Building is anyway, considering it's illegal to go there.

      As if illegality stops people from doing things!

      That big round thing is a Doppler radar. It seemed to make sense to put it on top of the tallest building in Cambridge.

  7. They want to play like that, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you know this means war.

    1. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      With this story hitting /.'s frontpage, they'll have to retaliate. And of course, we'll probably have to hear about it here.

      News for nerds. College pranks that matter.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by Yunalesca · · Score: 1

      Hey, speaking as someone on the Caltech campus, we're waiting for something cool to show up, courtesy of MIT folks.

      --
      The floggings will stop when morale improves.
    3. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the guys at MIT are studying 'Real Genius' with great intensity as we speak, looking for revenge tactics.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    4. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the guys at MIT are studying 'Real Genius' with great intensity as we speak, looking for revenge tactics.

      Ah, but according to the rules, pranks should be original and not mere repeats of old ones. Many/most of the pranks from the movie Real Genius were based on real things which happened at Caltech.

    5. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      Sounds like I need to enroll at CalTech.

      ...but only hot women can reside in my closet.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    6. Re:They want to play like that, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully MIT will take notes from the HMC v. Caltech prank and make off with that cannon. Watching the Caltech administration cry and threaten lawsuits is great fun.

  8. That's just great. by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    College students conduct prank - film at 11!

    Seriously, why should I care about this? I mean, it's about nerds and all that, but... how is it "news for nerds"?

    1. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally prefer funny light-hearted stuff like this to the usual content of religious Linux-izing. This is bigger news than reading about the burger Linus ate for lunch yesterday.

    2. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What if the burger was made from the ground-up flesh of the Pope? It's newsworthy then, isn't it?

    3. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called, "it is just plain funny"

      i know you dont have a sense of humor, which removes all possibility that you would enjoy this article.

      but basically. get a fucking sense of humor and stop being so idiotic.

    4. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be Gates, you insensitive clod. Linus would never ate a popeburger.

    5. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The big question is, was it a BK Burger?

    6. Re:That's just great. by raistlin42 · · Score: 1

      slashdot poster wonders how article is "news for nerds", film at 11!

      Seriously, is it necessary to ask this question on EVERY SINGLE article?

      --
      "My life is a joke that no one gets"
    7. Re:That's just great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, why should I care about this? I mean, it's about nerds and all that, but... how is it "news for nerds"? Yet you posted.

    8. Re:That's just great. by Fyz · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    9. Re:That's just great. by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Ah, already... this is becoming monotone.

    10. Re:That's just great. by Queer+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I mean, it's about nerds and all that, but... how is it "news for nerds"?

      Dude, if you have to ask why a prank between Caltech and MIT is being covered on Slashdot, why are you here?

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  9. Argh... by avalys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, the problem with this is, MIT has a reputation (deserved or not) as being better than Caltech. Caltech can do this to MIT, and people go "Hah hah, how clever." But, if MIT were to do this to Caltech, people would say "What stupid arrogant assholes, why don't they stay in Cambridge and stop bragging about their superiority at other schools."

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're both good tech schools - lighten up. This sort of no-harm, no-foul rivalry is healthy.

    2. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what the parent said is true.

      what you said is true.

      but public perception is what the parent said

    3. Re:Argh... by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. (Caltech alum, myself.)

    4. Re:Argh... by ShoeHead · · Score: 4, Informative

      Popular perception, perhaps. That's because more people go there, and more people care about USN&WR than care to hear the facts. Just ask an Asian parent.

      Search for the THES World Rankings (it's a pdf). Caltech has been the best training ground for young scientists for the past decade. Look at the data for yourself.

      They get into better grad schools (again, data available online), have higher starting jobs, work harder, play more sports, enjoy much better weather, have a huge legacy (Feynman, Millikan, Einstein, Hale, Beckman, Richter, and more) and have much more depth in education than anyone out there. They write the important papers, and do the hottest research.

      If you want to be a scientist, Caltech is the place to be.

    5. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Caltech = balloons, a banner, and some t-shirts

      MIT = a freaking huge droid

      I don't know about you, but the winner is clear...

    6. Re:Argh... by Vagodin · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't think people who know both schools think one is particularly better than the other in any consistent manner. (Though there are way more MIT alums than Caltech alums... including graduate students, Caltech has about 20,000 living alums, while MIT probably cranks out that many every 5-10 years or so.)

      My perception from the INFORMED public (in part from talking to both MIT and Caltech prefrosh, and my own experience at Caltech) is that Caltech is seen as a little more hardcore in the amount of work one has to do and in its nerdiness. To quote some MIT prefrosh I talked to just a few days ago (while posing as an MIT prefrosh on the bus from the airport.. yay free ride!), responding to why she isn't going to Caltech's prefrosh weekend next week, "I didn't even apply. I want to be alive in 4 years." Another one informed me that "Caltech students have the reputation of being the epitome of nerdiness."

      I'm not convinced that this repuation describes the truth, though. From my own observations, the student populations seem very similar, though MIT's larger population perhaps makes it easier for it to pass as less nerdy to those who want to see it that way. On the other hand, prefrosh interested in hacking and nerdy delights will no doubt see a paradise ignored by those who want normal social lives but top notch science or engineering education. Caltech may have the same proportion of on-the-surface-normal kids as MIT, but their absolute smaller numbers make it more difficult for them to present a unified front, as if there's a population threshold a group must pass to be easily noticed.

      Students at both schools seem to think they're getting the best science/engineering educations available in the world, and they probably are. Many also regret that fact because of the pain and sleepless nights such an education can lead to.

      More questions? Do some research for yourself, in both Caltech and MIT tradition: http://www.google.com/

      In conclusion, they're all fine houses.

    7. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another bitter subpar student who was not accepted to MIT.

    8. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might have been true before, now MIT has a perfectly good reason to prank Caltech, instead of arrogance: retaliation. Unfortunately, the schools are probably too far apart for a serious pranking war to start; I would have loved to see what they came up with two or three pranks down the line...

    9. Re:Argh... by rdwald · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In conclusion, they're all fine houses.

      Yes, but they're not all fine Institutes of Technology.

    10. Re:Argh... by under_clocker · · Score: 1

      First-
      M.I.T. IS better than Cal tech...
      who would want to go to a 2nd rate school?
      If Mit had pranked Cal tech they would need a whole lot of spackle to repair their damages to their pride, reputation and collective Azzez.

    11. Re:Argh... by eric76 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I visited Caltech once.

      I was doing some work at the Pasadena Police Department for a few days.

      While I was there, the traffic seargeant asked me if there was anything I'd like to see while I was there. He was obviously thinking Hollywood, Movie Studios, Disneyland, the beach, ... .

      I really surprised him when I said that I'd like a tour of JPL. It turned out that the father of one of the cops was a scientist at JPL so it might just be possible.

      The next day he told me that they couldn't set up a tour of JPL at the last minute because some big project was going on. I think it was a Mars launch that week.

      So he asked what else I'd like to see. Again, he was thinking of the standard tourist sites.

      My second choice was Caltech. That kind of shook him up a bit.

      The seargeant called the head of campus security for Caltech and asked him to arrange the tour. Since I'm a computer type, he called up the computer center and arranged for us to meet him to give me a tour that afternoon.

      So the next day, we went over for the tour. One of the people with me grew up in Pasadena, knew exactly where Caltech was, but had never been on campus at all. I was a bit surprised to find out it was right around the corner from the motel I was staying at while in town.

      We went to the security office and the head of security showed us over to the computer center for the tour. We were on time, but the student who was supposed to give us the tour didn't show up for about 45 minutes. When he arrived, he said "Nobody has ever called us up for a tour. I thought it was some kind of joke."

      So we looked around the computer center a little while. Then we went over to see the seismographs. I wanted to walk through the physics building, but the security dude couldn't believe anyone would actually want to do that.

      The tour was a bit disappointing.

    12. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    13. Re:Argh... by chiefthe · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...but Feynman did his undergrad at MIT. MIT--building the future of Caltech, one undergrad at a time.

      --
      This was a quote of Kurt Vonnegut that didn't fit.
    14. Re:Argh... by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      A high school student who took the calculus sequence from me and took a year of ODE courses here applied to Harvard, MIT, CalTech and Stanford. He was admitted to Harvard and MIT but not Stanford; I do not recall but I think he was accepted by CalTech also. He decided to visit MIT and Harvard and pick one. He is now a senior math major at Harvard. So who is best? Stanford?

    15. Re:Argh... by Diphthong · · Score: 1

      Considering Caltech had to fit their hacks into the overhead compartments or under the seat in front of them, it's not so shabby.

      Freaking huge droids take up a lot o' space.

    16. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Einstein? When was Einstein at Caltech?? He was at the IAS in Princeton.

      Plus, you make it sound like all those scientists got their degrees at Caltech, as opposed to doing research there.

    17. Re:Argh... by Merc+no+Baka · · Score: 1

      Clearly Caltech. I could've attended any of the other institutes without being required to take quantum mechanics, and therefore would've failed to meet one of the loves* of my life. *...I'm talking about differential operators, naturally.

    18. Re:Argh... by Merc+no+Baka · · Score: 1

      All right, I admit shamefully that we don't have any freaking huge droids at Caltech. But we did have fighting robots at a party at 'Tech a few years ago.

    19. Re:Argh... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Caltech's undergrad school is about half the size of MIT's. They can be, and have to be, more selective. Better input yields better output.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    20. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, if we're comparing the schools, I'd give Caltech the edge in science and MIT the edge in engineering.

    21. Re:Argh... by MojoSF · · Score: 1
      When I was an undergrad at Caltech (Ruddock, 1974-77), I actually worked giving campus tours. As tourguides we had a route and patter. It was all pretty well structured. Demand for tours was pretty high, most of it coming from prospective students and their families. I doubt that has changed much.

      I suspect what happened is that you didn't get connected with whichever department actually organizes tours. I can't remember if it was the admissions office or public relations or what.

      I'm living near Pasadena again as of last year. My wife works for JPL, and we're members of the Athenaeum. Walking around campus for me is like stepping into a time warp. The undergrads pretty much look the same as they did in my time. It took me a little while to get past the anxiety flashbacks of having a stack of finals due ....

    22. Re:Argh... by slew · · Score: 1
      Well, if it's worth anything you (Ms. Anon Y. Mous), Einstein actually taught at Caltech [photo] in 1932 at as a visiting professor for several months before he went to IAS Princeton...

      This was right after he won the Nobel Prize in Physics and some people credit his time at Caltech as to convince him to move to the US before the Nazi party took over in germany (and I'm supposing he'd have a much harder time leaving with the Nazis in charge).

      Admittedly this could be somewhat confusing for someone who doesn't know the history and might help to explain to such a person why the Einstein Papers Project is housed at Caltech, with the backup at Princeton instead of the other way around.

      Of course not everyone went there to get a degree, but quite a few prominant scientists have visited from time to time...

      For your bemusement, here's an interesting summary of the life and times of Mr. Einstein...

    23. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, he visited Caltech. For a couple MONTHS. Caltech is a good school and there have been plenty of good people who have had a real affiliation with Caltech, either a degree or faculty there; no need to attach his name to the university to increase its prestige. Simply put, that's pathetic. Hey, I know, let's list everyone who ever gave a talk at Caltech among their scientific legacy.

      And yes, I know about the Einstein papers project, and no, there wasn't any toss-up between where to base it, Caltech or Princeton, which was decided on the basis of which school inspired him to emigrate.

    24. Re:Argh... by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      One of my friends was an associate professor at CalTech; he left to become a full professor at Stanford. He says that it is easier to be hired as a professor at CalTech than admitted as a student; he says this with his tongue planted in his cheek but it does reflect the exclusiveness of CalTech.

    25. Re:Argh... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      If a lack of good humanities makes you more hardcore, then Caltech wins. There were two reasons I didn't even apply there, but went to MIT: Lack of humanities (my second major was theater) and lack of females. (I am female, not looking for a date.) And MIT was better in my first major anyhow.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    26. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, right. Maybe in New England they think that...

      Hell, I'm not even in California. I don't live within 1000 miles of Caltech, but "everybody" here knows Caltech is the better school.

      People would say "what stupid arrogant assholes" because people from Baah-st'n are often arrogant assholes, not because we think they go to a better school.

      (Especially compared to how mellow Californians are. Think "New England school", and you think "wearing a tie". Think "California school", and you think "wearing shorts".)

    27. Re:Argh... by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Heh - you know what happens when a student transfers to MIT from Caltech? The GPA goes up in both places...

    28. Re:Argh... by narooze · · Score: 1

      Students at both schools seem to think they're getting the best science/engineering educations available in the world, and they probably are.

      Well, the second best maybe, but the again, you can't really compete with the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm, Sweden.

    29. Re:Argh... by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to mention that in the late 1980's Caltech's Interhouse Party was named one of the best parties in Los Angeles (that was by Playboy) two years in a row, and then the administration shut it down because someone got stabbed. But we aren't all horribly nerdy you know.

    30. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I visited Caltech I drove down from northern California and when I got to Pasadena I couldn't find it. I stopped at a local gas station and asked the attendant how to get to Caltech. The attendant had no idea what I was talking about. So I decided to go to MIT.

    31. Re:Argh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will you go out with me?

    32. Re:Argh... by under_clocker · · Score: 1

      No No no... First If I were. a cal tech student I would prob be real upset because I know I would always be playing brown nose to my boss who was from Mit... SInce everyone knows that MIT is where you go not that other 2nd rate school full of babby boomers hippies and dorks. WHo would want to be a cal tech Weeny when you could have a 1st rate education for the same price. no thats ok I will stick with the established name which is MIT not silly little cal tech... That should stir the pot suffieciently. hahaha

    33. Re:Argh... by Phragmen-Lindelof · · Score: 1

      One of the faculty members at the Royal Institute of Technology, Henrik Shahgholian, collaborates with one of my colleagues on free boundary problems and visited here about a year ago. Shahgholian is an outstanding mathematician and a very nice person. I agree that RIT is an outstanding university/institute but I do not know how CalTech, MIT and RIT compare. I do know that MIT has a 2004 Abel prize winner, Isadore Singer, and RIT has no Abel prize winners.

    34. Re:Argh... by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      It took me a little while to get past the anxiety flashbacks of having a stack of finals due

      You don't have to visit the beautiful Caltech campus to get those anxiety flashbacks.

      The blood empties out of my head every time I hear the The Ride now:)

      [Note to nonalumni: finals week at Caltech consists of heavy duty studying, late at night, taking final exams at all hours of the day or night, tests frequently lasting 3 hours, and then being woken up by a humongous stereo at 7am playing Wagner's Ride of the Valkyries.

      That's right. Caltech's Honor System meant students were entrusted to take

      • limited-time,
      • closed-book,
      • non-collaborative,
      • take-home
      final exams.

      I was disappointed as an MIT graduate student to have to herd into some lecture hall with dozens of other unshowered half-awake students to take a proctored test at some weird time like 8:00 AM.]
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  10. um... by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is "Slashdot" news, you know news for nerds.

    The topic is MIT and Caltech, not much nerdier than that!

    1. Re:um... by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Funny

      The topic is MIT and Caltech, not much nerdier than that!

      Why does the person wearing the T-shirt in that photo has 2 lumps on his chest?

  11. Good pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the sort of stuff that I like - good natured, harmless pranks. Reminds me of the various MIT hacks that I read about many years ago (something involving a VW bug if I recall....).

  12. Re:this is news ? by Nos. · · Score: 1

    Well if we want to rehash old rivalries, we could bring vi vs. emacs in, or one of the numerous others that has been flogged to death over the years. However, its not like we'll get to see emacs running around with a VI t-shirt, so I guess the *IT rivalry is more entertaining.

  13. Re:this is news ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're still new around here?

  14. I call hoax. by Electroly · · Score: 5, Funny

    They don't have girls at Caltech. (T-shirt picture.)

    1. Re:I call hoax. by javaxangel · · Score: 1

      That's me, and I assure you I'm real.

    2. Re:I call hoax. by Inspector+Lopez · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yikes! I married a Caltech girl! Or ... at least that's what I thought I did.

    3. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know they can do wonders with hormones and vaginoplasty.

    4. Re:I call hoax. by burdalane · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do, just mostly ugly or weird ones. I'm a girl who graduated from Caltech, and though I don't consider myself ugly, I certainly have an antisocial personality.

    5. Re:I call hoax. by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Funny
      They don't have girls at Caltech

      They have enough engineers, they'll probably build one from scratch using an Apple IIe computer and pictures from magazines. And she'll take a shower with them, but the engineers will be too embarassed to take off their undewear in the shower.

      Come to think of it, now it all makes sense. That is why they are trying to recreate life in the bio labs, all the early earth atmosphere tests. They want some pussy.

      Damn crazy Cal Tech kids. What is next, filling a house with popcorn using solar rays??

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    6. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pics?

    7. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice boobies

    8. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real and looking good. Wish we could see your face too.

    9. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a recent picture, but here's how I looked in my younger days: Glad photo #7

    10. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no you don't

    11. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how exactly do you know that?

    12. Re:I call hoax. by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      Wierd Science :). i ought to watch it again.

    13. Re:I call hoax. by Vulture101 · · Score: 1


      can you prove it ?

    14. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Real Genius. [spelling][Brilliant][/Brilliant][/spelling]

    15. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      ROFL

    16. Re:I call hoax. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      *Cue joke about men=men, women=men, children=FBI Agents*

    17. Re:I call hoax. by JeremyALogan · · Score: 2, Funny

      I realized how badly I needed to leave the house when my first thought at seeing the shirt was "wow... she's hot"

    18. Re:I call hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you do.

    19. Re:I call hoax. by Y2 · · Score: 1
      Yikes! I married a Caltech girl!

      You mean a Caltech Girl?

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  15. Wow, going cross country... by GrodinTierce · · Score: 1

    ...that is some serious dedication. However, I was under the impression that Caltech had a rival on the West Coast, namely Harvey Mudd, right?

    --


    Tierce
    Who sponsors your feelings?
    1. Re:Wow, going cross country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Caltech student myself, and as far as Harvey Mudd goes, they aren't really considered around campus. However, we do consider ourselves rivals with MIT. Personally, I'm looking forward to seeing what MIT comes up with in response!

    2. Re:Wow, going cross country... by Joe+Decker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Caltech alum here (Darb/Ma/84), I'm wondering if the parent is thinking of the Cannon thing (the Fleming Cannon, as I recall, was stolen back and forth with Mudd a few times--maybe as late as the 1970s?)

    3. Re:Wow, going cross country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've decided that instead of doing something clever but harmless they'll just firebomb every building on campus instead.

    4. Re:Wow, going cross country... by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Informative
      However, I was under the impression that Caltech had a rival on the West Coast, namely Harvey Mudd, right?

      http://everything2.com/?node=one-way+rivalry

      A situation where people in group A compete in their minds with people in group B, while the people in group B are barely aware group A exists and would laugh at the idea of competing with them if they thought about it. Examples: Harvard vs. MIT, CalTech vs. MIT, Linux vs. Microsoft.


      As I understand it, there's a series of one-way rivalries which goes something like so: Harvard targeted by MIT, which is targeted by Caltech, which is targeted by Harvey Mudd. Members of the targeted school are largely oblivious that they're the subject of said rivalry.

      Hopefully getting this on the slashdot front page (which is widely read by folks at both Caltech and MIT) might escalate the current prank war. It should be fun to have an active prank trade-off going between both MIT and Caltech. Hopefully people have a lot of frequent flyer miles.

      I have no idea how the Caltech students managed to find the free time for this, though. Maybe they're all seniors or something?
    5. Re:Wow, going cross country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I would hope this would escalate the sadly-lacking prank war between CalTech and Mudd (I go to the latter school). Not only does CalTech not even think about us anymore, we actually haven't even done anything to deserve thinking about, recently. Occasionally a prof will put in a veiled comment about CalTech on a test (Ran is particularly good at this), and that's really about it.

    6. Re:Wow, going cross country... by sweetleaf · · Score: 1

      When I was in school, Caltech had a ratio of 7 males for every female.

      Harvey Mudd had a ratio of 3-1 and a women's college next door. We often consoled ourselves that "at least we didn't go to Caltech."

    7. Re:Wow, going cross country... by joulesm · · Score: 1

      Nope, we're mostly freshmen and juniors, with a token sophomore and a token senior. And we are sooo behind on work now :-/

  16. In response, MIT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    In response, MIT slashdotted a server carrying accounts of the pranks.

    1. Re:In response, MIT... by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Actually, they responded by DDOSing the site a couple days before this hit slashdot.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    2. Re:In response, MIT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mc lauryyyy!!

  17. MIT returns fire... by MAdMaxOr · · Score: 4, Funny

    destroying CalTech's web servers...

    1. Re:MIT returns fire... by csrjjsmp · · Score: 1, Informative

      They actually did. For most of Saturday, the site was either incredibly slow or completely unreachable because of a DOS attack from MIT.

    2. Re:MIT returns fire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't us you commie pigs.

  18. Frosh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's the origin of the word "frosh?" That's one of the dumbest-sounding words in the English vocabulary. Frosh. Sounds like a refrigerator malfunction. Why not just say freshmen? That at least makes a modicum of sense.

    1. Re:Frosh? by sndtech · · Score: 3, Informative

      frosh is the name applied to incoming freshmen before they are formally admitted at the begining of the year by the chancellor of the university.

    2. Re:Frosh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Nope.

      Prefrosh are prefrosh until the end of rotation, when the cannon fires.

      Frosh are frosh until the very same moment the next year, for there shall always be frosh.

      It's a complicated set of customs and traditions, but that's how it is.

  19. MIT wins by donutello · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like they slashdotted http://caltechvsmit.com

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:MIT wins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, that would be the DoS attack that was launched before the site was /.ed, in case you were wondering.

      I'm posting Anon because I go to Tech.

  20. Slashdotters to caltechvsmit.com by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    All your servers are belong to us!!!

    24 comments and the site is down :(

    1. Re:Slashdotters to caltechvsmit.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, those bastards at ITS limit undergrad upstream to 10 megabits/sec.

    2. Re:Slashdotters to caltechvsmit.com by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 1

      All your servers are belong to us!!! 24 comments and the site is down :(

      Guess the score is:
      CalTech: 6 MIT: 1 Slashdot: 1

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
  21. Last laughs by ari_j · · Score: 4, Funny

    Caltech may have pranked MIT's prefrosh weekend, but MIT got the last laugh by having their puppet doughnuthole submit the story to Slashdot. Caltech is a small (no, tiny) campus, and that one server fire could take the entire place out by morning.

    1. Re:Last laughs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: "We suspect that some Jacks had been DDOS-ing the site in order to cause it to overflow and shutdown we would like to say that DDOS-ing is not productive, not funny, and is not in any way under the code of conduct of pranks or hacks, and is in fact quite illegal. You will also notice that the site is currently up and running."

    2. Re:Last laughs by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      Doesn't appear to be an MIT puppets site, check the IPs--caltech.edu and caltechvsmit.com are in the same /16, and I'm pretty sure that Caltech at least at one point rated a class B address space.

    3. Re:Last laughs by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, I had misread the parent of my post (parent). Mod down both at will, I should have read more carefully.

    4. Re:Last laughs by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      Caltech is a small (no, tiny) campus, and that one server fire could take the entire place out by morning.

      Nah, I'm pretty sure Caltech's Segway police will be able to quickly respond to put out the fire. ;)

    5. Re:Last laughs by ari_j · · Score: 1

      I was once disappointed I didn't get into Caltech. Thank you for the cure. ;)

  22. caltechvsmit.com by cvdwl · · Score: 1

    So... anyone want to comment on why the web (caltechvsmit.com)page is down? You REALLY ought to secure your server when you're bragging.

    --
    ... grumble, grumble, grumble, mutter, mutter, Millenium... Hand... Shrimp, I tol' 'em, I tol' 'em.
    1. Re:caltechvsmit.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't tell me you haven't heard of the Slashdot Effect...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_effect

  23. Et tu, /. ? by nsayer · · Score: 1
    We suspect that some Jacks had been DDOS-ing the site in order to cause it to overflow

    We suspect that someone posted the URL to /.

  24. The war has begun. by dominion · · Score: 0
  25. Hehe by bob+whoops · · Score: 0

    So that's why my friend came back saying that he didn't want to go to MIT...

  26. Obligatory Simpsons reference by ari_j · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apu graduated high in his class at Caltech. That is, Calcutta Technical Institute.

  27. MIT wisely chose a more effective prank by melted · · Score: 1

    They've posted a whole bunch of links to Caltech sites on slashdot. Bwahahahaha!

  28. Guess what mit students did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Flood that website! haha

  29. C-A-L-T-E-C-H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The laser message also included an arrow, which I can only assume the Caltech students meant to point west toward their own campus. Instead, they incompetently aimed the arrow to the east, directing anyone who wants to visit as a result of this hack straight into the Atlantic -- and if anyone does follow it, well, it serves them right.

    1. Re:C-A-L-T-E-C-H by joulesm · · Score: 1

      There is no arrow pointing anywhere, it just repeated C-A-L-T-E-C-H. No arrows anywhere.

  30. MIT pranks by A+Sea+and+Cake · · Score: 5, Informative

    MIT pranks tend to be so much more artful than the ones listed here. Caltech has yet to transform an MIT building into a cathedral or cause the president's office to disappear entirely.

    I'm unimpressed by Caltech if they can't pull pranks that are better than the pranks MIT pulls on itself.

    1. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, a few years ago, we _did_ cause our president's office to completely disappear.

    2. Re:MIT pranks by avalys · · Score: 1

      Yes, but...MIT was the first to do it.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caltech does have at least one good prank to its name.

    4. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your link:

      "In an elaborate Halloween Hack, students turned Lobby Seven into a Cathedral, ostensibly dedicated to Our Lady of the All-Night Tool. ("Tool," in MIT jargon, means either to study hard, or one who studies hard all the time)."

      Who here really thinks the phrase "Lady of the All-Night Tool" is meant to imply someone who studies hard?

    5. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Who here really thinks the phrase "Lady of the All-Night Tool" is meant to imply someone who studies hard?


      Given how passionate some students around here are about their studies, I wouldn't be surprised if some of them did study hard.

    6. Re:MIT pranks by bartr0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      I personally am a big fan of the '84 Rose Bowl Prank, where the scoreboard was modified to say "Caltech 38, MIT 9." Look into the "Legends of Caltech" books for more Caltech prank history. About making rooms disapear: I am a Caltech student who has already had his room disappear over thanksgiving this year. I can also back up that we have made Dr. Baltimore's office (our prez) disappear at least once while I've been here, but it was not considered a big deal.

    7. Re:MIT pranks by putaro · · Score: 1

      What have you done this century?

    8. Re:MIT pranks by prockcore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Caltech has yet to transform an MIT building into a cathedral or cause the president's office to disappear entirely.

      MIT has yet to have a movie made about their pranks.

    9. Re:MIT pranks by Illserve · · Score: 1

      I'm unimpressed by Caltech if they can't pull pranks that are better than the pranks MIT pulls on itself.

      Be fair, it's much easier to pull pranks on yourself. You know the people, you know the places, you have ID cards that match the school you're at, you probably have keys to HVAC facilities, you know what stores are where, you know how to drive in Boston(!), you have easy access to class schedules

      The list goes on and on. The valid comparison would be to see what MIT could do to Caltech.

    10. Re:MIT pranks by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      CalTech = near LA. Lots of movies are made in or near LA.

      MIT = near Boston. Not a lot of movies are made near Boston (comparatively) (and most of the ones which supposedly take place in or near Boston are shot in or near LA).

      Coincidence?...perhaps... ;)

    11. Re:MIT pranks by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Me. ;)

    12. Re:MIT pranks by beacher · · Score: 1

      As an aside from the Cal Tech / MIT pranks - I've found a Yale hack/prank that's simply fucking awesome.

      On November 20, 2004 at the 121st Yale-Harvard game, 20 Elis donned custom made "Harvard Pep Squad" t-shirts, applied enemy-red war paint on their faces, and set out to pull a prank on 1800 Harvard alumni. Like clockwork, these brave Elis proceeded to exude more Harvard spirit than any Cantab ever... tossing t-shirts to the lucky and unsuspecting few, and passing out 1800 sheets of red & white construction paper in perfect order to the cheering Harvard crowd. With 4:47 minutes left in the second quarter of the game, each member of the crowd raised their sheet of paper expecting to spell out "Go Harvard" as they were told by the cheering "Harvard Pep Squad." Instead, the truth was revealed to a laughing crowd of YALE alumni and students who saw the Harvard crowd spell out in clear red letters"WE SUCK." Harvard just needed a little help expressing their true school spirit. A tight-knit crew of Elis led by Mike Kai and David Aulicino (PC '05) made sure it happened.

    13. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, someone at Caltech DID cause the president's office to disappear entirely, just a couple years ago.

      ~AH (Blacker/Dabney '04)

    14. Re:MIT pranks by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      Caltech has yet to transform an MIT building into a cathedral

      Why would they want to? They should tranform Caltech into a Bazaar.

    15. Re:MIT pranks by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      Very little of these "advantages" exist as all of the information is online, and you can bring your own materials.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    16. Re:MIT pranks by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      <draco.mit@edu> on 11.04.2005:

      "Coincidence?...perhaps... ;)"

      unbiased?...perhaps...;)
    17. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The list goes on and on. The valid comparison would be to see what MIT could do to Caltech.


      They'd probably replace Caltech with a very small shell script.
    18. Re:MIT pranks by rotenberry · · Score: 1

      Back in the 1980's students performed the same prank on Don Cohen in the Firestone building. Beginning Friday night they filled in his door flush to the wall, painted it the same color as the wall, and (when it dried) hung a photo of Prof. Cohen titled 'Professor Emeritus'. When he came in on Monday it appeared that there had never been an office in that part of the hall.

      In keeping with the Caltech tradition, student 'volenteers' repaired everything, but I saw the photo in his office in 1986 and heard the story.

      This prank occured so long ago that last year Don Cohen actually did become a Profesor Emeritus.

    19. Re:MIT pranks by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      +12 Funny.

      ROTFLMAO (for you youngsters, this translates roughly as "LOLOLOL")

    20. Re:MIT pranks by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Feh...I never feigned a lack of bias. hehe...
      Funny thing is: I was a "film student" at MIT. Go figure.

      But as for movies, it's silly to try to make comparisons based off of stuff like that. As I'm sure CalTech folks will be never hearing the end of "Real Genius" comments until the day I die, likewise, if I hear one more comment about MIT janitorial geniuses...well, you get the idea. It's all funny and silly.

    21. Re:MIT pranks by burdalane · · Score: 1

      Caltech students have long been making dorm rooms disappear.

    22. Re:MIT pranks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why we hope to see you at Caltech soon.

  31. that's not funny by jtbauki · · Score: 1

    that's not funny. what WOULD be funny would be to see a Caltech student fight a M.I.T. student. I would pay to watch that.

    1. Re:that's not funny by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

      haha hell yeah.. making fake doors and putting a car on top of a building... yeaaah.. *yawn*.. an all out nerd bloodfest, ENTERTAINMENT

      --
      Slashdot sucks
  32. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  33. Sounds like an Onion headline... by lost+in+place · · Score: 5, Funny

    Newsflash: Dorkwads Prank Dickwads in Famous Wad Rivalry!

    1. Re:Sounds like an Onion headline... by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      LOL! That post was awesome!

    2. Re:Sounds like an Onion headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now you're a mere +2 funny - one of the truly rare cases a post deserves +10 Funny.

    3. Re:Sounds like an Onion headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent execution.

    4. Re:Sounds like an Onion headline... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      HA HA

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  34. DoS by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    It was DoS attacked it before it was /.ed.

    If it was insecure why didn't MIT just deface it and then brag about it by changing the score and leaving a noten like the rules say to do?

  35. Re:this is news ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is definitely a one-sided rivalry. MIT really doesn't care about Caltech, but Caltech really cares about MIT. MIT has it's own one-sided rivalry with Harvard, but believe me, most MIT people just don't give two shits about Caltech. (I was an undergrad at MIT, but spent over a year working at Caltech. I know both cultures.)

  36. Re:this is news ? by cmacmanus · · Score: 2, Funny

    No you dolt, it's the nerd Super Bowl. Soon we will have collegiate teams of geeks that contest with each other in great fashion like the other college sports..betting on such, making regional trees, ranks, etc :p

  37. Is that the best they could do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Travel 4k+ miles to put balloons up and put on a laser show? When I was in college all we ever did was get drunk and have sex, I am glad I never turned in my app to CalTech.

    1. Re:Is that the best they could do? by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Travel 4k+ miles to put balloons up and put on a laser show? When I was in college all we ever did was get drunk and have sex, I am glad I never turned in my app to CalTech.

      Yeah, but the prospect of getting laid by a fellow nerd girl, that is much better than banging some loose sorority girl who puts as much thought into riding a guy as washing the dishes. Just going throught the motions. Now imagine a nerd girl, laughing through her nose when you tell her a joke, getting goosebumps when you touch her, one that has never been penetrated before. That is why the Cal Tech guys traveld 4,000+ miles to MIT. And anyone who knows anything about getting Nerd girls, knows there is a competition at the end that usually ends with synthasizer music and a robot dance.

      MIT = Revenge of the Nerds

      Cal Tech = Real Genius

      Take your pick. Dance with bugger grabbing a moo-moo's ass, or have someone put a micro-speaker in your tooth and tell you "this is god, stop playing with yourself".

      Ahhh... the highjinks of college life.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:Is that the best they could do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly -- if these /. posters are correct, going to caltech would have limited the sex part of your college education.

    3. Re:Is that the best they could do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man you need help... and those who modded this interesting need to get a life.

  38. Where's the sticker? by gardyloo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Best theoretical college in physics and engineering. Best. In the world. Period.

    OK, so does it have a big sticker on the front doors? Really, have we learned nothing lately?

  39. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey spammer, grab a free shut the fuck up.

  40. MOD PARENT DOWN by Rufus211 · · Score: 1

    I wish I had mod points. Take a look at the last few stories. This guy's just been copy/pasting stuff to get his FREE CRAP links up.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN by (1+-sqrt(5))*(2**-1) · · Score: 1
      This guy's just been copy/pasting stuff to get his FREE CRAP links up.
      Speaking of which, I wonder if it's high time Slashcode implemented NOFOLLOW.
  41. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by John+Newman · · Score: 4, Funny

    A bunch of Yalies pulled a similar prank at this year's The Game, but there was no lock-picking or theft involved - just pure social engineering. They reconnoitered the Cantabs' stadium and designed their own card stunt. The day of the game, they dressed up as the "Harvard Pep Squad", and passed out their cards, without, apparently, raising an eyebrow. And not once, not twice, but three times (or more!), they got 1800 Havard students and alums to declare as one: "WE SUCK".

    In their own words, or as told by the Yale Daily 'News'.

  42. Web Technology? by borwells · · Score: 1

    Apparently they don't cover how to keep your webserver running at Caltech.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
  43. I just love these by TrondS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Say what you want, but pranks and happenings such as these really spice up the students days and I love reading about them. We used to do similar pranks when I was studying, several made it to the news. Our favourites included installing elevator music in the elevators, bashing the Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology students (we were electronics) and their train (they had one train, we had one on tracks that actually works). One night we made two "full size" garden gnomes out of paper mache and placed them on two readily available points. We made the news in several newspapers for that. See the pics here http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2004/06/24/401413.h tml?i=1 16 pictures total.

    1. Re:I just love these by joulesm · · Score: 1

      I know!! At least we caused a stir :-D People can say how lame our pranks were all they want, but this has created such a commotion in the MIT hacker's community and here. Isn't this part of the fun??

  44. Purdue Pranks by redswinglinestapler · · Score: 0

    In the first phase of my undergraduate career (long story), I was at Purdue, a place famous for engineers and infamous for its mind-numbing, unspeakable conservativism. We didn't get many pranks, but one of the better ones was the time someone erected three outhouses outside of the Math building: one for Men, one for Women, and one for UNIX. Sadly, they were torn down only a bit later. Steve Beering had no sense of humor.

  45. C.I.T. == california institute of technology by I33II3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also, nearly immediately after the banner was placed that read:
    "That Other" Institute of Technology
    "That Other" was changed to "The Only" by the M.I.T. kids.

  46. Re:oi... by javaxangel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Just as soon as you get a login or use your real name :)

  47. Compared to other Hacks . . . . by redswinglinestapler · · Score: 0

    Compared to MIT's history of frankly, wicked cool Hacks (What the students and faculty at the nerdiest of the nerd schools call prectical jokes) this one is pretty lame. Topical, but lame. See the MIT Campus Police Car Hack for one of the better ones performed by MIT. I'm still partial to the Harvard/Yale/MIT football game though.

    1. Re:Compared to other Hacks . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, I'm sure MIT has its share of lame hacks. If you're going to compare the Police Car Hack to something, compare it to Caltech's Rose Bowl prank.

    2. Re:Compared to other Hacks . . . . by javaxangel · · Score: 1

      Are you not aware that that Yale/Harvard football game prank was itself a rip-off of the Caltech Rose Bowl prank? Guess not...

    3. Re:Compared to other Hacks . . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Rosebowl prank isn't really comparible, as Caltech sucked so horribly they weren't even in the match.

      edg

  48. Real Genius was filmed there... by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Funny

    And it looks like that is the film where they got their prank ideas from, the laser lights. Too bad they did not have the frozen ice that turns directly to gas... maybe... or kaboom. I couldn't finish the equations last night so I don't know how volatile it is.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Real Genius was filmed there... by Y2 · · Score: 1

      Real Genius was not filmed there, becasue the Caltech public affairs folks did not care for the way professor Hathaway was portrayed. Hoever, the film was researched there and at least one techer was hired as a consultant. The indoor sets, particularly the dorm, are based on Caltech. The outdoor campus filming was done down the road at Occidental College.

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    2. Re:Real Genius was filmed there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by frozen ice, I assume you are refferring to the sub 273 degree K from dihydro monoxide. However, most of us prefer to call it just ice. The frozen is slightly redundant.

    3. Re:Real Genius was filmed there... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      >it looks like that is the film where they got their prank ideas from..

      Which would be only fair, since Real Genius got many of its ideas from Caltech (the "car in the dorm room" being a classic prank). http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~erich/real_genius_refs .html

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  49. Enough April Fools jokes already!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it would be safe to come back to Slashdot after April 1 was over. Guess not.

  50. These pranks prove which school is better: MIT by cheesedog · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Think about it: doesn't the fact that these Caltech guys were willing to shell out for airfare to travel 3000 miles in order to pull this stuff speak for itself? Doesn't this act itself turn MIT's campus into a sort of 'Mecca' for these people? Did they bow down and pray to The Great Dome before offering their sacrifices on the alter of prankdom?

    Would anyone at MIT have entertained, even just for a moment, traveling to California to do something similar to the California Institute of Technology? I doubt it.

    Not to say that Caltech isn't one of the top engineering schools in the country: of course it is. But it doesn't enjoy MIT's prestige, and these pranks just go to enlarge that prestige.

    1. Re:These pranks prove which school is better: MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't think so. They probably just think MIT's overrated, and want to get even more cool freshmen for next year.

      Besides, they can keep their engineering. For bio and physics, Caltech is number one.

    2. Re:These pranks prove which school is better: MIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, CalTech has more of a history of pranks than MIT does. I mean, see this page.

  51. Speaking of pranks... by redswinglinestapler · · Score: 0

    The undergraduates used to award a nice-looking trophy with a large aluminum left-handed screw to that professor that best exhibited the kind of callous attitude that makes getting through MIT more difficult than it needs to be.

    You know, like scheduling a 4 hour final exam at an inconvenient time, etc; the kinds of things that drove the sale of the IHTFP T-shirts.

    There wouldn't be such a list on the web, would there?

    1. Re:Speaking of pranks... by lakmiseiru · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This event [Big Screw] is still run; this year's event happened this week.

      See here for a slightly outdated list of winners and charities; Chuck Vest (Make a Wish Foundation) won in 2004 and Prof. George Verghese (Doctors Without Borders) won in 2003. The 2005 winner will be announced tomorrow evening, and will be presented with the four foot long, left-handed aluminum wood screw.

      --

      Access denied: Not enough clue for requested operation.
  52. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by qval · · Score: 2, Funny

    you'll hopefully have all heard of http://www.harvardsucks.org/. I bet their video will be slashdotted before morning though...

  53. Caltech once changed famous Hollywood sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caltech students once changed famous Hollywood sign to this:

    Caltech

  54. MIT, Caltech, and College Prank books by redswinglinestapler · · Score: 0

    For those interested in the whole MIT/Caltech hack/prank scene, this is an excerpt of a review I did some years ago of books from The MIT Press, the Caltech Alumni Association and St. Martin's Press.

    First up, Legends of Caltech and More Legends of Caltech. These two 80 page volumes chronicle technopranking at Caltech from the 1920s to the late 1980s. Learn about the classic Rose Bowl card section prank that was broadcast live on NBC, See the HOLLYWOOD sign become the CALTECH sign before your very eyes. Vicariously enjoy the revenge of Caltech students upon a greedy police department.

    These books MUST be ordered from the Caltech bookstore, as they are privately published by the Caltech Alumni Association. Ordering info is at the bottom of this page.

    Ah, but what of MIT? For their history we must turn to a pair of books.

    The Journal of the Institute for Hacks, TomFoolery & Pranks at MIT. Published by the MIT Museum, this is a 158 page book with lots of photos and text concerning the hacks pulled by MIT men and women over the decades. See The Great Breast of Knowledge, The Great Pumpkin, the legendary Smoot Marks on the Harvard Bridge. Read about the chronic humiliation suffered by the inmates at Harvard as MIT has its way with the statue of John Harvard and the Harvard Stadium.

    "Is This The Way To Baker House?" - A Compendium of Hacking Lore. 165 pages of legends, essays, photographs and stories of and about hacking at MIT. This book, published in 1996, continues where the Journal leaves off. The MIT Campus Police car on the Great Dome, arguably one the greatest hacks in MIT history, graces the cover and several inside pages. Regrettably, only black and white photographs are used in the body of the book, as there are several hacks, most notably, the Cathedral of Our Lady of The All Night Tool (The "stained glass" panels in Lobby 7) that really should be seen in full color. That minor gripe aside, this is a fine companion volume to The Journal and shares the same binding dimensions as The Journal, making them a handsome pair of books to grace the shelves of any creative malcontent. (The title refers to the canonical reply to an MIT Campus cop when one is discovered in a spectacularly inappropriate location, such as the apex of the Great Dome at 4:00AM.)

    Our final book is published by St. Martin's Press and should still be available via any bookstore that will special order books for its customers.

    If At All Possible, Involve A Cow - The Book Of College Pranks, is a 240 page history of collegiate pranking in America, beginning with the earliest colleges in America, and even taking note of some hijinx taking place in Canada.

    This is an excellent companion volume to the preceeding four books, as it covers collegiate pranking in general, as well as detailing some events that are NOT covered in either the Caltech or MIT books.

    If I were sending a son or daughter off to college, I would certainly include all five of these books in their "books to bring to school" box. Start 'em off right!

    I have all five books and have enjoyed reading and re-reading them. I trust that these will be inspirational to all who enjoy a good hack and tweaking the nose of Authority, be it the State or the School.

    Ordering information

    Legends of Caltech is $9.00
    More Legends of Caltech is $15.00

    The mailing address of the Caltech Bookstore is:
    Caltech Bookstore Mail Code 1-51 San Pasqual Street Pasadena CA 91125

    The website for the Caltech Bookstore looks like you might be able to order these online.

    The toll-free number for the Caltech bookstore is 800/514-2665. For those of you outside the US, their non-free number is 818/395-6161.

    In my case, shipping was $6.00. Call to find out what your charges might be or to use a credit card.

    (Neither book has an ISBN, so ordering via your local bookstore is not recommended and may very well be nigh-impossible.)

    The Journal of The Institute for Hacks, TomFoolery

  55. mirror by SkyIce · · Score: 3, Informative

    mirror (see the pranks link for images)

    1. Re:mirror by joulesm · · Score: 1

      Thanks :-) You are sweet!!

    2. Re:mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do none of these mirror systems actually mirror the images? The images are still linked to the orig web server, which still works mind you.

  56. Don't worry... by John+Seminal · · Score: 4, Funny
    Nobody who is anyone has been at MIT in ages. I think the last smarty pants there was Richard Feynman and all he did was help make the nuclear bomb.

    I remember meeting a kid from Cal-Tech, and to this day his impression remains with me. I have never met such a mix of intellect with insanity. He was working for the summer at Northwestern University, and I spent a couple days at his rented house (which a friend of mine from high school was renting with his girlfriend, there were 6 people living in this old house). Anyways, this guy had a pet spider, but not any spider, a black widow. And one night he wanted to cook for all of us. He boiled a big pot of water, Dropped in a head of chopped lettice, and two slices of american cheese. He then served it to us with so much pride. Later that night I broke out a huge jug of Vodka and a half gallon of OJ. We were making screwdrivers that were nearly see-through. After his first glass, he started crying about how he's never been with a woman. By his second glass, he was singing in chineese. He could not finish his third glass, he fell asleep on the floor right there. So the next morning we wake up, and I look in his fishtank, and the black widow is gone. I ask him what happened, and he said he felt bad for it and let it lose the night before. I asked where, and he said "I don't remember, maybe in your room" FUCK! I left that day, and never returned.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nobody who is anyone has been at MIT in ages. I think the last smarty pants there was Richard Feynman and all he did was help make the nuclear bomb.

      Feynman may have done his undergrad at MIT, but he did most of his interesting work at Caltech, including quantum electrodynamics (QED) and Feynman diagrams.

      He also taught lock picking courses to undergrads as well as less interesting subjects like physics.

    2. Re:Don't worry... by earthstar · · Score: 1
      That was a good laugh!

      But that incident has more to do with the effect of alcohol rather than the college the guy is from.Obviously,Even a MIT student could have been like that under Vodka! :-)

    3. Re:Don't worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man, I thought you weren't gonna tell anyone!

      Now all of slashdot knows.

      *runs off crying*

  57. DO NOT MOD PARENT OR GRANDPARENT by ari_j · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't mod either of Joe's comments up or down - he corrected his own mistake. We've all done this a bajillion times, especially in the wee hours of the morning, so let's not take it out on Joe just because we've lost karma over it in the past.

    Mods: If you have to take out your anger on a comment, mod this one down instead.

    Joe: You owe me one, bud. ;-D

    1. Re:DO NOT MOD PARENT OR GRANDPARENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH shit! He might lose precious KARMA!

    2. Re:DO NOT MOD PARENT OR GRANDPARENT by lewp · · Score: 0, Troll

      Care about karma a little too much?

      --
      Game... blouses.
  58. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't Harvard win the game?

  59. You see, it's actually quite doubtful by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    If there have ever ever been wedding for any of the MIT students, even more so, on the site itself...

    Well, you get the idea.

  60. Those of us at MIT... by adorai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    know that Caltech is more hardcore. We also hear that it's more miserable.

    1. Re:Those of us at MIT... by joulesm · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that is true :-P

    2. Re:Those of us at MIT... by Smattacus · · Score: 1

      AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH..............so true! I'm writing this sooo late int he morning. Time for a 3 hour nap then more homework. Yes!

    3. Re:Those of us at MIT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naps are for the week. Get yourself a cup or coffee or a beer and go back to work.

  61. Related Reading by Carpet · · Score: 2, Informative

    For all those interested in more school rivalries and pranks, get a copy of:

    If at All Possible, Involve a Cow: The Book of College Pranks

    by Neil Steinberg

    Very fun reading.

    1. Re:Related Reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but also out of print (so sad).

  62. fool me once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Caltech did suprise our hacking community, but we were caught offguard only once. As was noted in multiple other comments, no less than 20 minutes after the Caltech kiddies unfurled their "The Other" banner over "Institute of Technology" our guys made and unfurled a "The Only" banner. The balloons weren't all that creative or elaborate, and what the Caltech vs. MIT page won't admit to is the Caltech kiddies also tried to do some silly thing Saturday night. A buncha our hackers were patrolling the roofs, found them, and told them to turn over their Caltech ID's or they were gonna call the cops. We now have a buncha Caltech ID's. Anyways, to finish off the arrogrant bragging, the way someone explained it to me when I was a prefrosh (and I agree) was this way: Caltech sees us as rivals, but we just don't care about them one way or the other.

    1. Re:fool me once by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      That's lame.... If you don't care about them one way or the other, then why spend nights patrolling rooftops of all the buildings, and not allow them to show their 'stupidity' when they try? That's what I don't understand.

    2. Re:fool me once by Vagodin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Caltech sees us as rivals, but we just don't care about them one way or the other.
      First of all, if someone explained it to you at MIT, then clearly someone at MIT cares at least a little. Also, your post makes it sound like you yourself actually care, at least a little. Either way, I think I can explain this "rivalry", in part.

      First, I don't think we see MIT as a rival in a "we win you lose" sort of way. But let's assume that we do in a "we want the best frosh we can get and a lot of people are considering both schools" sort of way.

      A typical Caltech freshman class has about 215 students. MIT's have on the order of 1,000. This means that the schools admit around 500 and 2500 students, respectively. MIT, then, has at LEAST 2000 students in it's prefrosh pool that don't even have Caltech as an option (in a given year), so that even if Caltech took all of the students that are chosing between Caltech and MIT (I don't know the number, but probably more than half of total Caltech admits applied and were admitted to MIT), MIT would have at LEAST about 4/5 of its prefrosh pool in tact. If, on the other hand, Caltech lost all of the students deciding between the two, it's pool of prefrosh would decrease by 1/2.

      Such a "rivalry," then, is understandably more important to Caltech than MIT, due to Caltech's small size (which, by the way contributes to lots of its awesomeness).

      Regarding a pranking rivalry, I don't think one has really existed in the past at either school. But wouldn't it be cool if there was one? Lots of cool stuff might happen. That was kind of the point of Caltech's work this weekend. We're suggesting a pranking rivalry, in good spirit. Looking at the response, it looks like MIT might agree, but let's keep it in good spirit. Pranking/hacking should be fun for the pranker and the prankee. If you give a good joke, you should be able to take a good joke.

      Prankers/Hackers at Caltech and MIT have a lot in common, and should have more interaction. Anyone up for an ice cream social? I'll provide music and a laser light show (much better than the one that was projected on to the green building... there will be more preparation).

    3. Re:fool me once by Qwerty0 · · Score: 1

      2500? Do your Googling, buddy -- you're way underestimating MIT's yield. 1495 students were admitted for the class of 2009. In terms of percentages perhaps that says a lot about which school is viewed as more desirable in the eyes of incoming freshmen.

      About the one-way rivalry thing -- don't feel too bad, Caltech. Us at MIT have spent years mocking Harvard and they don't even notice... :)

    4. Re:fool me once by Vagodin · · Score: 1
      The calculation was meant to be more "order of magnitude" than precise. The calculation and explanation are not, I believe, significantly affected by substituting 1500 in for 2500.

      Also, I won't dispute with you that Caltech isn't for everyone. It's a unique place, and if one isn't prepared to work really hard, despite his/her smarts, then one shouldn't go to Caltech. The social environment is not what most are used to, though, to some, very cool. Caltech may have a repuation of being a bit harder/weirder than MIT, but I'm not sure this is true, though it wouldn't surprise me. See my previous post (Re: Aargh) for exploration of this issue.

      I've tried hard in these posts to explain my reasoning, and even point out where I'm lacking data (as in the above post). I'm disappointed by your comment:

      In terms of percentages perhaps that says a lot about which school is viewed as more desirable in the eyes of incoming freshmen.
      It's useless (in terms of conveying useful information) and misleading! First of all, the qualifier "perhaps" makes the statement weak and almost manifestly true. You don't provide any information on what the precentages might say, if indeed they say anything. The percentages COULD indicate many things. But do they ACTUALLY indicate anything? "Dear reader, assume what you will."

      Perhaps the percentages indicate that noxious fumes from the Charles River leave prefrosh in a state of euphoria-induced poor judgement, though I doubt it. Your comment provides little guidance. You can do better.

      This /. story, and the Caltech prank, are not about MIT vs. Caltech in a "who is better than who" way. They're about having fun and taking pride in the things we have in common.

      These schools are composed of individuals. We don't need to fight for our school's names as if we're fighting for our own. Sure we have an interest in the "value" of our degrees, but which school is slightly better (if that even has an agreeable well-defined meaning) doesn't matter. Personally, I try not to tie my self-respect to anything or anyone but myself. Again, they're all fine houses.

    5. Re:fool me once by Qwerty0 · · Score: 1

      I'd say the difference in losing 100 students in a group with 500 excess admitted as opposed to 1500 excess admitted is significant... but you're right, I'm missing the point anyways. Sorry. Was stuck in bed sick all weekend hearing about this and not seeing it; am cranky; that was uncalled for, my apologies.

  63. oh nooo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those pranks... again... *yawns* and again.

  64. Wow by darth_silliarse · · Score: 1

    The wit of it all. I'm sat here amazed and astounded!

    --
    I've noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born - Ronald Reagan
  65. 3 little pigs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    one time, in middle school, some people let some pigs onto the campus. They painted on the pigs "1", "2", and "4". The faculty spent weeks looking for the third one.

    http://www.bash.org/?482717

  66. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by Mahou · · Score: 1

    that reminds me of a yale vs harvard video i saw on exbyte http://www.exbyte.net/media/videos/416/Harvard_Suc ks.html

    --
    if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
    ...te?
  67. "prefrosh" by Sinner · · Score: 1

    Could someone had an option to Slashcode to filter out any story containing the word "prefrosh"? I don't have to know what it means to know I don't like it.

    --
    fish and pipes
    1. Re:"prefrosh" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prefrosh = pre-freshman = one who has been accepted but has not yet matriculated (scary... another big word)

    2. Re:"prefrosh" by StuffJustHappens · · Score: 1

      As a UK citizen I just had to look up this word on Google. The definition provided by Google's link to answers.com was informative but when I looked at the adblockable elements on the page, this turned up:

      http://www.answers.com/main/content/img/pron.gif

      It just goes to prove that wherever there's a student you'll find pr0n!!

      --
      --What's this sig thing all about then? Should I have one?
    3. Re:"prefrosh" by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, it isn't a real word. Looks like something acedemic idiots made up to feel special.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  68. As an MIT student by LegoEvan · · Score: 1

    and a brother of the play midnight-wiffleball-with-prefrosh fraternity, I must say the balloons in lobby 7 were pretty tame. I guess they never heard about the balloon at the Harvard-Yale football game. We'll be sure to get them back, don't you all worry.

  69. Memo about admissions... by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Being that caltech is so much better than MIT you would think that they could find a good spell checker...

    To: All Admissions Staff
    From: Director of Admissions

    In order to continue fundraising, we have to admit 40% legacies that are shit for brains. They can't read or write, but their fathers have us on an allowance, and we want the money. Plus, without legacies, there would be nobody there to say "You got me again, you silly nerd!". The other 60% will be merit admission, with 30% comming from India. Please be mindful that engish is their second language, and some of them might feel more at home taking baths in the Boston River. The other 30% are American Chinese students. Unlike the other 70%, they know american grammer and spelling.

    But feel good, at least we are not Harvard. There legicies are dumber than our legacies.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Memo about admissions... by agpenm · · Score: 1

      ...might feel more at home taking baths in the Boston River. I believe you mean the Charles River. I wonder what percentage of students know basic geography (or take the time to look it up).

    2. Re:Memo about admissions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Score 5, ignorant racist shit. P.S. Your spelling is atrocious. What are you, Indian?

    3. Re:Memo about admissions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Standells said many years ago:

      Yeah, down by the river
      Down by the banks of the river Charles (aw, that's what's happenin' baby)
      That's where you'll find me...

      Because I love that dirty water
      Oh, oh, Boston, you're my home

    4. Re:Memo about admissions... by blue_adept · · Score: 1

      But feel good, at least we are not Harvard. There legicies are dumber than our legacies.

      But their spelling is probably better.

      --

      "Is this just useless, or is it expensive as well?"
    5. Re:Memo about admissions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder what percentage of students know basic geography (or take the time to look it up).


      The funny thing is, only loud-mouthed Bostoners would give a shit.

      The only commonality of Texans and Bostoners is that within two minutes of the start of a conversation they'll let you know where they're from... whether you care or not.
    6. Re:Memo about admissions... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 1

      Being that caltech is so much better than MIT you would think that they could find a good spell checker...

      Not to mention the most basic knowledge of geography:

      ...taking baths in the Boston River

      There is no river named the "Boston River" anywhere near Boston or Cambridge. In fact I don't think there's a "Boston River" anywhere in the state of Massachusetts. But then I guess this is to be expected from people whose only knowledge of geography is the urban sprawl of the Los Angeles area - they've probably never even seen a real river. Heck, they probably even refer to the Pacific Ocean as Lake California or something like that...

    7. Re:Memo about admissions... by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Los Angeles, the rivers are paved.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    8. Re:Memo about admissions... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only commonality of Texans and Bostoners is that within two minutes of the start of a conversation they'll let you know where they're from... whether you care or not.

      Hey now, I'm from Texas and I take offense at your sterotyping! While being Texan, I certainly do not tell everyone that I'm from Texas at the beginning of every conversation held right here in Texas. In fact, none of my Texan neighbors here in the great state of Texas go around telling the other Texans here in Texas that they're from Texas.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    9. Re:Memo about admissions... by iocat · · Score: 1

      Giving students in California tests about geography might hurt their self-esteem. So Lake California it is.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    10. Re:Memo about admissions... by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Couldn't be an Indian. We use the Queen's English.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    11. Re:Memo about admissions... by osmic234 · · Score: 1

      grammar?

    12. Re:Memo about admissions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Over there people are dumber than our people.

  70. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  71. BS... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
    See, the problem with this is, MIT has a reputation (deserved or not) as being better than Caltech. Caltech can do this to MIT, and people go "Hah hah, how clever." But, if MIT were to do this to Caltech, people would say "What stupid arrogant assholes, why don't they stay in Cambridge and stop bragging about their superiority at other schools."

    I am not affiliated with any school. When I applied for colleges in the early 90's, I did not apply to either, although I did my research. MIT has been declining the past 20 years. Cal Tech is making a name for itself.

    The only news out of MIT that I have read the past 2 years is kids getting drunk and dying. The news out of Cal Tech is they are playing with lasers and doing cool stuff.

    MIT is at risk of becomming obsolete. 50 years ago Berkeley was a stud school. Today it is nothing special, no better than the University of Michigan or University of Texas. Berkeley rested on their laurels, and that is what MIT is doing.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:BS... by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      rofl...Berkley is the best public school in the nation. Yeah, they rested on their laurels...

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    2. Re:BS... by John+Seminal · · Score: 0
      rofl...Berkley is the best public school in the nation. Yeah, they rested on their laurels...

      By what rankings? They don't even come close to the University of Pen. I am too tired to spell the full name. You would be suprised where Berkeley ranks, I don't think it is above the University of Florida or University of Virginia.

      I don't think Berkeley is the best public state school in California, that would probably be UCLA.

      Heck, while we are at it, lets add Indiana University, University of Illinois, University of Michigan to the list of public universities that are more competitive than Berkeley.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:BS... by Samari711 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I looked at MIT 4 years ago and was not very impressed at all. Sure from a prestige standpoint once you get your MIT degree people will always be impressed but the feeling I got when I went to visit was that they didn't really give a shit about undergrads because they're not bringing in research money. It was like they weren't even trying to sell the school. Maybe they didn't think they needed to but one info session there was all it took to convince my not to apply.

      First they were using a promo video that was at least 10-15 years old, that contained more than a few inuendos about parties and drinking that seemed a little bit out of place since it was a few years after Scott Kreuger's death. Also they were bragging about how the president of Bose Stereo taught a class there every year while the speaker system buzzed the entire hour and a half the presentation lasted. The school might have a ton of resources available but I would rather be at a school where professors actually cared about their students.

      looking back, I definitely made the right choice. I'm confident that got more out of my education here at Notre Dame than I would have at MIT and had a lot more fun doing it too.

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    4. Re:BS... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm just a dropout from the U. of North Dakota, but even I know that Penn is a private school.

    5. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Berkeley sucks. I have friends who go there and they're constantly complaining about how the classes are way overcrowded and the teachers don't really give a shit about teaching. Most of them see it as an annoying distraction from research. Many classes, even upper division ones, are taught by grad students. Not to mention Berkeley is right by that ghetto known as Oakland....

    6. Re:BS... by Filiks · · Score: 5, Informative

      US News and World Report. 2005: #1 Berkeley

      From 2000, but complete: Berkeley was the number 1 public university and 20th when counting in privates like Harvard and MIT. BTW, those two ranked numbers 2 and 3 behind number 1 California Institute of Technology aka CALTECH!

    7. Re:BS... by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 0

      LOL...wow. Did you ever miss every point there was to be gotten.

      It was like they weren't even trying to sell the school.

      Sorry, but if you needed to be "sold" on anything, you were already not even close to understanding, well, the entire point, really. MIT doesn't need to "sell" anything. Go online. Look around. Do some research. Then, if you need to then be "sold" by an antique recruitment video, then you have completely missed the boat...

      but the feeling I got when I went to visit was that they didn't really give a shit about undergrads because they're not bringing in research money.

      You're "feeling" was wrong.

      The school might have a ton of resources available but I would rather be at a school where professors actually cared about their students.

      I assume you base that on your erroneous "feeling", so it is without any backing.

      I'm confident that got more out of my education here at Notre Dame than I would have at MIT

      But there's no way to know, is there?

    8. Re:BS... by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      although I did my research. MIT has been declining the past 20 years.

      Best. Post. Ever.

      I'd write more, but "John" already got factually owned in following posts...lol.

    9. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh... so you "looked at MIT".
      Did you get accepted?
      Otherwise you didn't really have the option.

      Guess you're looking for jobs now? Have you discovered that probably 99.9% employers prefer to hire MIT graduates?

    10. Re:BS... by essdodson · · Score: 1

      This is pretty much how any research driven institution works. Go there for grad school, do your undergrad somewhere that is known for teaching effectively.

      --
      scott
    11. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're feeling, huh? Now I'm definitely glad I didn't go to MIT.

    12. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're "feeling" was wrong.

      Gosh, I'm glad I didn't pay for a college education.

    13. Re:BS... by slackerboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      US News and World Report. 2005: #1 Berkeley

      Huh? According to the actual U.S. News & World Report rankings, Berkeley was 21 overall for undergrad for National Universities. It was, however, #1 for public institutions. A more relevant ranking here would probably be undergraduate engineering. That list has MIT, Stanford, and Berkeley, in that order.

      To be honest, in my experience, undergraduate engineering education at big research universities doesn't necessarily produce good practicing engineers.

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    14. Re:BS... by dollargonzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      hate responding to what looks like a troll, but presentation of a school to prospective students is very important. all you get when you look online is that they are #1 of lots of lists, not that they provide a good undergraduate education. my girlfriend transferred from notre dame to an ivy league, thinking it would be better, so she *can* tell, and she always says that notre dame was a much better undergraduate experience, where, as grandparent said, they care a lot about students.

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    15. Re:BS... by Matt+Clare · · Score: 1
      they didn't really give a shit about undergrads

      They did give a shirt when Caltech was on campus

      --
      .\.\att Clare
    16. Re:BS... by Geraden · · Score: 1

      When I was looking at MIT (in the late 80s), the stupid asshats couldn't figure out how to use a projector to show us their promotional film.

      Instilled real confidence.

    17. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ivy Leaguers haven't been coddled or cared for by teachers since pre-school, they've learned to learn and get a rewarding academic experience through hard work or discipline. If you want the teachers to hold your hand through your undergraduate education, you should probably just enter the workforce; or enter one of the 10,000 crappy schools that will hold your hand.

    18. Re:BS... by Anitra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a similar experience to you. MIT struck me as being very cold and impersonal. I wanted a great engineering/tech education, but that didn't seem like the right place for me.

      Instead, I went to WPI, jokingly referred to as "that other tech school in Massachusetts". It's a fairly small school, focused on teaching undergraduates. The people are friendly, and just as nerdy as they are at MIT. A degree from WPI is pretty well-recognized within the Northeast, and I know a few undergraduates here who managed to get their MQP (aka senior thesis) published in a scientific journal.

      In the end, I feel that I made the right choice. I picked a school that was small and personal, so I could excel in my studies, have a personal life, and still get a great education. I'm sure that would have been possible at MIT, too - but I don't regret the choice I made.

      --

      Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
    19. Re:BS... by n3bulous · · Score: 1

      Re: the teachers interest teaching, you've just described every research institution in the US. The schools do have professors who actually enjoy teaching, though they are few in number and that usually dwindles as the profs get tenure or burned out.

      Having said that, the profs are generally quite cool to work with or interact with as peers.

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    20. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. Undergraduate education is a point of pride at MIT. I'm saying this as a MIT Graduate student who has taken a few undergrad courses. Some of the best professors gladly teach the intro courses. For example my BIO 101 was taught by two greats: one was the head of the human genome project, the other was also famous. My computer security class (a joint undergrad/grad course) was taught by Ron Rivest -- the "R" in RSA -- in what amounted to a very well thought out curriculum. I'm not sure what impression was conveyed by the video, but in my personal experience, their reputation for providing a great undergradute education was well deserved.

    21. Re:BS... by Cecil · · Score: 1

      You're "feeling" was wrong.

      First of all it's "YOUR feeling" not "YOU ARE (YOU'RE) feeling"

      Secondly, he is absolutely right. MIT does not cater to undergrads. They are unapologetic about this fact (and it is a fact). They are a research university, and like other research universities, research is done by grad students, not by undergrads.

      When I was younger, being naive and idealistic, I always wanted to go to MIT. However, even Dr. Edmund Bertschinger told me not to bother, that there were many other schools which focus on, and do a better job of, teaching undergraduates.

      You really sound like you're trying to rationalize your own going to MIT for undergrad, except that your atrocious grammar suggests that you didn't. That or they really aren't a very good undergrad school after all.

    22. Re:BS... by Samari711 · · Score: 1

      Actually I didn't bother applying. But I didn't have any trouble getting a job at Lockheed Martin so I think things worked out pretty well.

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    23. Re:BS... by forii · · Score: 1
      [MIT was] using a promo video that was at least 10-15 years old, that contained more than a few inuendos about parties and drinking that seemed a little bit out of place since it was a few years after Scott Kreuger's death.

      The thing I liked about Caltech is that at least we were smart enough to stop drinking before we died.

      gdbg

    24. Re:BS... by studentAtTheOnlyTech · · Score: 1

      not true. MIT is one of few research and grad institutes that lets undergrads do real research

    25. Re:BS... by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      he is absolutely right.

      Oh?..you have some incontrovertible proof as to this? My main point is merely that people who really do not know all that well what they are talking about (including yourself) keeping stating random opinions and anecdotes as if they were facts!

      They are a research university

      There seems to be this pervasive myth that MIT does all this research and correspondingly doesn't give a crap about undergraduates. It is just plain false.

      First:
      and like other research universities, research is done by grad students, not by undergrads.

      Incorrect. MIT has a program called UROP which is exactly about getting undergraduates involved in research. http://web.mit.edu/urop/index.html

      And second, MIT is one of the few large, well known, "research" schools in which the undergraduate classes that are typically taught by PostDocs, assistants, etc. at other schools are taught by full professors at MIT.

      However, even Dr. Edmund Bertschinger told me not to bother, that there were many other schools which focus on, and do a better job of, teaching undergraduates.

      I see. And you did a full poll of all the faculty, to get an accurate sampling of opinions, correct? Certainly, you didn't just go off of one anecdotal comment?

      except that your atrocious grammar suggests that you didn't

      LOL...let me tell you, never EVER make a math error in public where it's known you went to MIT. You will never hear the end of it, even if you make just 1% as many as the general public does.

      I apologize that you find my one grammatical error in a quickly posted message sent late at night to Slashdot so "atrocious".

    26. Re:BS... by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Hardly trolling...as for "when you look online", I'm talking about go to Citeseer, do some searches in a topic you are interested in. If there seems to be a lot of good work done on that topic at some school or another, then I whole-heartedly encouraged going there! If you are not entirely sure, and just want to do a more general literature survey in an area, again, go ahead...in *that* case, I'm pretty sure you'll find a decent amount of work done at MIT (in science and engineering areas of course).

      As for comparisons of Notre Dame, some other Ivy league, etc....all just anecdotal evidence...not really much to say there. I already wrote one reply about MIT as an undergraduate school elsewhere on this thread -- you might want to check that out.

    27. Re:BS... by LegoEvan · · Score: 1

      http://mit.edu/urop/ The Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program. MIT will pay you or give you credit to do research, for professors. If you have good ideas for research that nobody is currently doing, the office or a professor can sponsor you, and you can get money to travel to facilities, run experiments, etc. The program not only makes doing research fantastically accessible to undergrads, but also maintains programs like MIT's FormulaSAE and SolarCar teams.

      Buzzing speakers happen. I'm sure they happen at CalTech too. The claim that a buzzing speaker implies professors do not care about their students is outrageous.

    28. Re:BS... by Samari711 · · Score: 1

      That wasn't exactly what I was implying, two ideas got mixed together at 4am. It's just that when you've got a group of interested students there it definitely doesn't leave a good impression that the only classroom we saw had significant technical issues, as well as how none of the MIT graduates working for admissions could figure out what was wrong.

      --

      I never said I was smart, I just said I was smarter than you

    29. Re:BS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's that? You didn't apply? You speak as if you had a choice to attend MIT.

      Try not to bash an institution's image just because it wasn't for you. That's lame.

  72. Caltech /had/ some talent... by _defiant_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I still think the 1961 Rosebowl prank is one of the very best. But yeah, these latest MIT ones were lame.

    1. Re:Caltech /had/ some talent... by KingofSpades · · Score: 1

      Well, this one is also pretty good... It was available as a postcard at the Caltech bookstore ten years ago. Maybe still now.

  73. Bull crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call shenannigans on this post.

    "Better" grad schools is just a code word for elite. There are plenty of good grad schools out there, all the major corporations do not hire just from one or two schools (Want to know why? Beucase they know from experience that just beucase you came from a big name school does not make you the best person they are looking for!), they take good talent from wherever they can get it from. Similarly, even the elite universities on a pretty significant basis take students from state schools into their grad scools.

    The "more depth in education" is also a load of crap, sounds like more BS to support the false perceptions that you can only get a good education at these elite schools. There is lots of good education out there for the willing. This idea that you can only go to CalTech or MIT to get a good education is just bogus, look at all the good engineers that from from places like UIUC, U Texas, Renasslyer, various UC schools, and numbers of other lesser known public and private universities.

    The truth is that if you want a good education, the universities out there fight for students and usually provide a good education.

    The stuff that USNWR reports is totally bogus, you can't reduce the quality of an education down to statistics. I am not exactly sure about what "ask an Asian parent" means, but it sounds like a subtly racist jab at those who do not follow the college herd mentality to get into what is perceived to be "better" colleges.

    If you want to be a scientist, you need to be smart and have the initative and creativity of a scientist. There is top-notch research going on all over the country and the world. The decision where you go shouldn't be based on fallacious pre-conceptions about popular elite colleges but instead about how you can best use your skills to take you to where you want to go.

    1. Re:Bull crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I didn't say you needed to go to tech to get a good education. I'm just saying that the minimums of that education are leagues above say, UMich and UT (damn, can't believe you used that example. Look at the graduation requirements!! Griffiths is a joke for a senior level course.)

      Also, there's a reason why elite schools stay that way: money momentum is one, alumni is another, and research topics are a big factor.

      Frankly, in physics there is some really lame research going on around the country. If you really want to work in the interesting fields, you have to have the credit to prove you're worth it. And as for jobs: like I said, look it up--average starting salary.

    2. Re:Bull crap by coopex · · Score: 1

      As someone who's at UIUC right now, the top students here are comparable to MIT/Caltech, but the other 90% are mediocre.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    3. Re:Bull crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the laziest public university graduate does get the same caliber of education as the laziest Caltech or MIT graduate. I think the lesson to take home is "Don't be lazy." A motivated public university student can arrange to complete their undergraduate coursework early and start taking graduate-level courses before they graduate.

  74. Eyewitness by AtomSmasher10 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As one of the Caltech students who was at MIT this weekend, I'd just like to point out that regardless of how lame the MIT hackers may think our pranks were - and I know from talking to many of them personally that a large faction of them were actually quite impressed - I haven't seen MIT doing anything better in the past 10 years.

    1. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Eyewitness by AtomSmasher10 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although the Wright Brothers replica was tastefully done, I will point out that pranking another school is slightly more difficult than doing a prank at your own - particularly if you're pranking another school that's on the other side of the country. And the fact that we pranked MIT's CPW event does add a certain special element to it :-).

    3. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As one of the folks at MIT, you have managed to piss off a large number off people with your "neener-neener" tone. For example, there have been a few notable hacks in the last ten years -- perhaps you missed the scale model of the Wright Flyer or the One Ring or the police car? At MIT, the hacks are done for the amusement of others; that is, a hack is done _for_ something. At Caltech, it seems that pranks are pulled _on_ someone. Which is why I think so many hackers here at MIT are so irritated with Caltech's silly one-upmanship attempts.

    4. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the way it works is a lot of people think it was cool, but those who don't ( a smaller number) just happen to bitch a whole lot louder.

    5. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It requires the ability to let go of balloons in public spaces, yes. I think most people remain unimpressed with the technical aspects of the hacks.

      P.S. You also failed Rule 101 of banner hacks -- tying down the base of the banner so it doesn't flip up and obscure your message. It read "at other" for most of its time.

    6. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen MIT doing anything better in the past 10 years.

      Perhaps they were spending their time learning? Seriously, it's 2am and I'm stuck behind a computer finishing off a paper for Monday. I'm assuming I'm not going to get a chance to sleep at all tonight. What the hell are you doing wasting your time with this kind of thing? When I think of how much time must have gone into it, I'm a little pissed that so many people are getting such an apparently easy ride. I thought I was being indulgent by taking five minutes to read slashdot while I made another pot of coffee.

    7. Re:Eyewitness by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Funny

      IMHO, MIT's R2D2 Great Dome Hack was pretty cool, and that was just a few years ago.

    8. Re:Eyewitness by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry...I've heard nothing like that, at least.

    9. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't understand is how you expect a "reply" from us in just a week. From what I hear, you all had months to raise money from alums and plan this thing.

    10. Re:Eyewitness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ohhhhh!!!! you are a sleeping at 2:00 am!!! crazyyy man you are sooooo smart. Oh yes we dont really learn at caltech. That is very true. In fact, that is why our core curriculum requires that all our frosh take physics courses that your physics majors take their sophomore year. My, my what a pathetic institution indeed. I am in awe at your brilliance. P.S. Most of us rejected your school for this one because we were "intimidated" by the sheer brilliance of people like you. See you in Pasadena, sucka.

  75. Re:34A by Electroly · · Score: 1

    Why don't you ask her yourself? :-)

  76. Prank war rules by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Because most slashdotters probably won't actually browse around the site, I think it's important to repeat some of the rules of this prank war. The intent of this is good-natured fun, which seems to be missed by some of the commenters here.

    From http://www.caltechvsmit.com/overview.html:

    Both Caltech and MIT require that students put in a lot of hard work studying math and science. Because the stress is so intense, we students at Caltech believe that pranks are an important, if not essential, way to relax and have a little fun. We are familiar with MIT's tradition of hacks and hope that we can merge the cultures at the two schools, if only for a short time.

    We propose that MIT joins us in a pranking/hacking war. As you may have already noticed, we struck first, so now it is MIT's turn. Obviously the distance between schools poses a great difficulty, but we believe that MIT students will find that this difficulty can be overcome. In fact all of the pranks need not even be on the other school's campus so long as the pranks are made public enough through the media.

    The rules of the contest are simple and are essentially the same as Caltech's prank ethics and MIT's hackers' code. Pranks should be reversible. No permanent damage should be done and the pranksters must provide some sort of contact information on a note so they can be contacted if things are damaged. The note need not contain names, but it must be a reliable way to contact the pranksters.

    Pranks should be creative and display some form of originality. Novel ideas, particularly novel ideas involving technology, are generally well received, but repeats are strictly discouraged. We suggest that those wanting to participate make themselves very familiar with the history of pranks and hacks at both schools in order to prevent repeating pranks.


    Finally, we wish to inform MIT students that Caltech Prefrosh Weekend is next weekend. It may not be possible to organize something so quickly, but we have faith in the ingenuity of MIT students. We hope to see you all in Pasadena soon.

    As a side note, denial of service attacks are lame. Anybody can do that. Wouldn't your time be better spent trying to put a '2' on the scoreboard?

    1. Re:Prank war rules by vikman · · Score: 1

      The caltech student handbook has these guidelines in them - even for on-campus pranks.

      --
      --
    2. Re:Prank war rules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pranks should be creative and display some form of originality. Novel ideas, particularly novel ideas involving technology, are generally well received, but repeats are strictly discouraged. We suggest that those wanting to participate make themselves very familiar with the history of pranks and hacks at both schools in order to prevent repeating pranks.

      Hahahahah....CalTech is clearly scared that MIT is going to steal the cannon.

    3. Re:Prank war rules by arose · · Score: 1
      As a side note, denial of service attacks are lame. Anybody can do that.
      What about slashdotings?
      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
  77. appropriate for /.? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this indicative of the type of stories that /. is reporting now??

  78. Does anyone else think... by Vellmont · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These pranks only seem to indicate that CalTech students have a massive inferiority complex? These pranks are lame. How hard, interesting, creative, or amazing is it to release balloons with C.I.T on them or print T-shirts? Flying thousands of miles just to do that only shows you have too much money and not enough creativity.

    Sorry CIT, but you only seemed to have proven to the rest of the world how lame you are (and I didn't even go to either of these schools).

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Does anyone else think... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Out of pure curiosity, what would be considered an interesting, creative, or amazing prank in your book?

      I mean, other then detonating a nuclear device in Boston?

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Does anyone else think... by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      The stunt hack was cool. Having a baloon with your logo to inflate in the middle of a foodball pitch, in the middle of the match, was cool.

      What would be coool?

      Distributing tee-shirts with MIT and Caltech written in funny ink, "MIT" vanishing, "Caltech" appearing shortly after being worn (so the most hardcore MIT fanatics would find themself wearing shirts advertizing Caltech). Have "Caltech" written on the square by having many of you walk casually in pattern, with some paint on shoes, so where more people walk, there's more of the paint (sand, brick dust, coal?) left, building the sign.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Does anyone else think... by DirkDaring · · Score: 3, Funny

      An inspiring story from the pages of the Yale Daily News:

      The "Harvard Pep Squad" ran up and down the aisles of Harvard Stadium at The Game [between the Harvard and Yale football teams] Nov. 20. They had megaphones in hand and their faces were painted as they encouraged the crowd to hold up the 1,800 red and white pieces of construction paper they had handed out. It would read "Go Harvard," they said.

      But the 20 "Pep Squad" members were actually Yale students. And when the Harvard students, faculty and alumni held up their pieces of paper--over and over again--they spelled out "We Suck" in giant block letters the whole stadium could read.

      Yalies Michael Kai and David Aulicino, both of whom are to graduate next year, had to overcome great adversity to realize their dream. They originally planned to do this a year ago, and rather than handing the pages out, they taped them to the seats. "The prank derailed when security guards, trying to clear the stadium out during a pre-game bomb scare, asked Kai, Aulicino and their cohorts to leave."

      In the year since, they rethought their plan:

      They created a system to have the Harvard crowd pass out the 1,800 cards themselves. The "Harvard Pep Squad" went to each row and handed out a pre-ordered stack of the red and white papers. In five minutes, Kai and Aulicino said, all the papers were passed out.

      It took a great deal of planning, however, including a road trip to Boston. Kai and Aulicino attended the Oct. 9 Harvard-Cornell football game in Cambridge, simply to scout out the stadium and count the number of rows.

      They also created "Harvard Pep Squad" T-shirts and even fake Harvard IDs. "It was almost sad," says Dylan Davey, another Yalie who joined in the gag. "There were all these grandfather and grandmother types--and they all had big smiles, saying, 'Oh you're so cute, I'm so glad you're doing this.' I felt bad for about two minutes. Then I got over it."

    4. Re:Does anyone else think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Guess where those Yale students got that idea from? The famous Rose Bowl Parade prank from the 60's or whenever, done by... you guessed it... Caltech students.

      Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

    5. Re:Does anyone else think... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      I think the various football game placard pranks would qualify. I also think MITs prank of hiding the new presidents office would qualify. The "One Ring" around the great dome at MIT was pretty creative. Really there's a lot of very creative, interesting, etc pranks that've been done by many different schools and people (and I'm sure I'm missing some major ones). Unfortunately these CalTech guys don't even approach anything resembling a good prank.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Does anyone else think... by burdalane · · Score: 1

      One or two years ago, some Caltech students were displeased with budget cuts, so one night they broke into the administrative building. The next morning, when the president went to work, his office had disappeared. He found a chair and a filing cabinet next to the wall and a sign that read something like, "Gone due to budget cuts." But if MIT had already been doing this regularly, then I guess it wasn't really original. Anyway, I thought it was a good prank at the time because I didn't know about MIT's tradition. There were also some good Caltech pranks decades ago, such as hacking the Rose Bowl scoreboard and signs, flooding a McDonald's contest with entries, and moving traffic cones so that one of Caltech's parking lots filled up with confused drivers, including a cop, driving in circles.

    7. Re:Does anyone else think... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, though, that was just a copy of a previous MIT hack. (#7 on that list, it just gets overshadowed by its more-famous balloon twin.)

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:Does anyone else think... by Vagodin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Caltech rose bowl stunt was done back in the 60s, which is actually many decades before the MIT hack referred to above. This has already been noted in other comments. Good research porcupine8.

    9. Re:Does anyone else think... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I know MIT's wasn't the very first such stunt, but MIT had even done it to Harvard years before. Yale couldn't even come up with an original target.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  79. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A bunch of Yalies pulled a similar prank at this year's The Game, but there was no lock-picking or theft involved - just pure social engineering. They reconnoitered the Cantabs' stadium and designed their own card stunt. The day of the game, they dressed up as the "Harvard Pep Squad", and passed out their cards, without, apparently, raising an eyebrow. And not once, not twice, but three times (or more!), they got 1800 Havard students and alums to declare as one: "WE SUCK".

    Caltech did it first. sorry

  80. Lose/loose, the continuing controversy by ari_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, someone is catching on that these are two different words. That's good, but "to loose" is a perfectly cromulent word, with its own meaning. It was properly used here. If you lose something, you no longer know where it is. If you loose something, you unleash it (generally against someone or something).

    To use both in a sentence: If you lose your dictionary again, I will loose my wrath upon you!

    Or, to use some other tenses: Loosing her exquisite talent on me last night, she made it clear that she had long since lost her virginity.

    1. Re:Lose/loose, the continuing controversy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are looser (then her).

    2. Re:Lose/loose, the continuing controversy by ari_j · · Score: 1

      See, now - that's an adjective, and the one thing I have yet to see (although I have a suspicion it will rise in popularity now) is the use of "lose" as an adjective. For example, are the the losest sucker I've ever seen.

    3. Re:Lose/loose, the continuing controversy by Mignon · · Score: 1
      If you lose something, you no longer know where it is. If you loose something, you unleash it (generally against someone or something).

      I don't know about anyone else, but I've had just about enough of these pedantic posts. I swear I'm about to loose my shit on someone!

  81. Eyewitness by AtomSmasher10 · · Score: 1

    I apologize for the belligerent tone; these pranks were, in fact, meant to be in the spirit of friendly competition. If they've actually gotten MIT people and 'Techers pissed off at each other, I apologize on behalf of the Caltech pranksters.

  82. Huh? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not going to get into which is a better school, that's rather subjective when you get down to it better how) but they are worse because they pull pranks? HArdly, Caltech is known to be the king of pranks, this pales in comparies to their ultimate, the ultimate prank if you asked me.

    The year was 1961, and it was the Rose Bowl, which is held in Pasadena California. Now this is also where Caltech is located. Now Caltech doesn't play in the Rose Bowl ever, they don't play 1A ball for that matter, but some students form there decided to get in anyhow.

    That year, the Washington Huskies had an elobrate halftime show planned. It involved not only the band, but a set of cards that the audience would display. The way it worked was audience members sitting in the selected section had a bunch of coloured cards, and a sheet of instructions, telling them which colour to hold up on which cue. The cheerleaders then called cues, and the cards went up to form pictures.

    Well a group of Caltech students, later known as the Fiendish Fourteen, decided to alter what happened. They broke in to the room where the instructions sheets were stored, took them, made alterations, made copies, ageded the copies, then replaced them. Nobody noticed that a switch had been made.

    On game day the modified sheets were distributed and during halftime the show commenced. Most of the images were left largely unaltered, expect for minor changes, so no one knew what was happening. PRoblems started on the 12th image. It was supposed to be a huskie, but had been altered to look somewhat like a beaver (Caltech's mascot). The 13th image was worse, it was to spell out "HUSKIES" but Caltech reversed it to say "SEIKSUH". Seeing this, and figuring it for a fuckup, the cheerleaders quickly called for the next image, which read "CALTECH" in block letters.

    The band stopped playing, the stadium went silent, and the announcers were speechless. It couldn't have been more perfect, as the cameras were focuesd on the crowd at the time (halftime shows were broadcast then) and it went out on national TV. After a few moments silecnt, laguhter broke out. The band left the field, and the final image was never called.

    Now that, my friend, is a prank, and it's one of the things Caltech is known for. It's an odd university, with a somewhat different sense of humour, but that certianly doesn't make it bad. That they traveled to MIT to pull a prank is not supprising, like I said, they've done better.

    FYI: If this stuff intrests you, read If At All Possible Involve a Cow by Neil Steinberg. It was there that I orignally heard of this great prank.

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      > .. If At All Possible Involve a Cow by Neil

      At first, I thought that read "Involve a CowboyNeil"

      Great story BTW.

    2. Re:Huh? by Strontium-90 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the time that some caltech students reworked the famous "HOLLYWOOD" sign to read "CALTECH". There was another prank at the Rose Bowl where the scoreboard was hacked, causing it to list the teams as Caltech and MIT. There are a couple of books in the Caltech bookstore that catalog the numerous (and hilarious) different pranks done by Caltech students. Here's a link to a few of the pranks. These are by no means the best ones.

    3. Re:Huh? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      In my book, the "Ultimate Prank" took place in Stockholm, and it was carried out by Finnish technology-students. the prank itself is not widely known around the world, but it is IMO the best prank ever made. The story:

      There is a well-known (to Finns) statue of Paavo Nurmi in Helsinki. Apart from that big statue, there are lots of smaller replicas of that statue. What does this have to do with pranks? Read on.

      HMS Wasa is a famous Swedish warship that sank on her maiden-voyage. Year was 1628. the ship was re-discovered in 1961. The ship had sunked to depth of 62 meters. As the ship was re-discovered, it made big headlines in Sweden.

      As it happens, there were some Finnish students from Helsinki University of Technology were visiting Stockholm when Wasa was re-discovered. And they decided to play the ultimate prank. They bought a miniature Paavo Nurmi-statue and went to the site where Wasa was discovered. The area was closely guarded, but somehow the students managed to dive in to the ship, made their way to the captains quarters, and placed the statue there. No-one knew that they had been down there, and they haven't told how they managed to do it.

      As the ship was re-srufaced, experts started to study it. Only to find a relatively modern statue in the captains quarters. I can only imagine the collective "Huh?" they had when they found it :). the students had engraved their contact-information to the statue, and the students in question held a big news-conference about the incident, further annoying the Swedes.

      further info (in Finnish though)

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      , read If At All Possible Involve a Cow by Neil Steinberg

      I thought it was Cowboy Neil?

      Jeez, I've got to read something other than /. while online.

    5. Re:Huh? by Knight2K · · Score: 1

      Pretty good. Just to keep things even, Caltech aren't the only ones to tweak the noses of some big schools during a football game. MIT has had its fair share including:

      http://hacks.mit.edu/Hacks/by_year/1990/H-Y/H-Y. ht ml

      The better hack, in my opinion, was the balloon they inflated at mid-field during the Harvard-Yale game that read MIT. They don't appear to have that exhibit on-line.

      --
      ======
      In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
    6. Re:Huh? by porcupine8 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Caltech is known to be the king of pranks

      You've obviously never been to http://hacks.mit.edu. If the only Caltech prank worth talking about (which I assume it must be since two separate people felt the need to put the whole story on here) was 35 years ago, that's sad.

      If this stuff intrests you, read If At All Possible Involve a Cow by Neil Steinberg.

      This book also mentions some MIT hacks. But if you're more interested, check out the three separate books that have been written solely about MIT's hacks.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    7. Re:Huh? by Vagodin · · Score: 1
      porcupine8 -- Listen to yourself!
      If the only Caltech prank worth talking about (which I assume it must be since two separate people felt the need to put the whole story on here) was 35 years ago, that's sad.
      I don't believe you. I really don't. MIT has done great hacks. Caltech has done some great pranks, several of which were on national television or caused a nationwide media event. Maybe some of MIT's did too. You can learn about where to find more info in a bunch of these posts.

      Do you really assume that? Really? Are you really so blinded by love for your school that you sacrifice curiosity, restraint, and objectivity?

      People who know little about both MIT and Caltech pranks remember a few huge pranks that they heard about on TV or read about in popular books. They don't keep track of when they were. Come on. Don't assume like that. You just make yourself look bad. Please. You can do better. Please. For the children.

    8. Re:Huh? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I think you're taking this far, far too seriously.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Rose Bowl was the Beavers' home field for many years. Only the UCLA Bruins (who now use it as their home field) have played more games in the Rose Bowl. UCLA gets the nod for also playing in the New Year's Day Rose Bowl Game, which Caltech never made. Not with their football team, that is...

    10. Re:Huh? by Vagodin · · Score: 1

      When not pulling pranks or studying, I fight for integrity. Decency, however, is another thing all together ;)

    11. Re:Huh? by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Integrity is all well and good, but when it comes to a rivalry, "talking shit" is more important.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its funny that you say that Caltech hasn't ever played in the Rose Bowl. It was actually our home field until 1990. Up until very recently we had played more football games in the Rose Bowl than any other team in the world. The holder of that record is now UCLA since it is now their home field.

  83. Great... student prank is stuff that matters ? by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Can we please get a OFF-TOPIC topic that I can uncheck in my preferences ?

    Thanks in advance.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    1. Re:Great... student prank is stuff that matters ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No.

      And the April Fools waste of time and space stories are staying too. How terrible that you have to scroll past a silly story.

  84. Re:34A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please mod this post down. This is thoroughly disrespectful, especially considering that the girl is active on this Slashdot article.

    If engineers/nerds hope to attract more women to the fold, this type of behavior is not the way to do so.

  85. In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by Phil+Urich · · Score: 3, Funny

    There legicies are dumber than our legacies.

    Ahem. "Their legacies". I take it you're not part of the American Chinese 30%.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    1. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering you missed the obvious 'grammer', I guess you arent part either.

    2. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      *cough*

      "Grammer" is spelled "grammar". ...which is part of why I got to go to Cornell, despite not being a legacy :-)

    3. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got you all beat.

      A proud S.F.A.S.U. alumnus!

      Ax 'em Jacks!

      So there...

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    4. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Speaking of pranks, here's one Yale pulled on Harvard in November:

      http://www.harvardsucks.org/

    5. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      My god. Imagine if somebody tried that at a chelsea v arsenal game.

    6. Re:In the name of academic nitpickyness . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that all the British comediens of note have since retired and become politicians and left a definite void in the typical Brit's psyche....There would would have been blood on the playing field, dead burnt bodies in the stands and enranged hooligans with gnashing teeth carting around the decapitated bodies of members of the 2 teams.

  86. The Official Tulane University Response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, the joys of going to a lower-tier university. The official response of Tulane University students will be to give you a drunken glare, ask "What the *hiccup* fuck are you talking abou--" and then leaving midsentence to chase some sorority girl.

    Actually, when I wrote it to sound degenrate, but now that I think about it: no matter what the outcome of the inevitable prank war, it looks like the joke is on both of them.

  87. Geee the definition of pranks has lamed a little:/ by zenst · · Score: 1

    Well whoopy they made tee-shirts and put up plastic plants, Geee what next. Wearing there tee-shirts inside out. A standard teenager on a drink up does more exciting and defining pranks than this. Had they not highlighted them as `pranks` I suspect everybody would have missed em.

    MIT,, Mass Ingenuity Trashed or is it Major Idiotic Tricks :(*

  88. Re:34A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not everyone likes DD sized ones. I find she looks pretty, I wish we could see her face, which matters a lot more to me than that...

  89. As a Caltech student, by Verence · · Score: 1

    I look forward to it. When you fly into LAX have the SuperShuttle take you to Caltech Stop #1.

    --

    ... that's all i wrote...
  90. I thought it was great =) by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
    I wish that my school had that cool of a rivalry with another school. I go to CSUS, but no one here (or at Davis, our "Rivals") have the balls to do any really cool pranks.

    I'd do a good prank, but those pansies would probably cry or wet themselves or something, and I'd have to deal with the stench as it drifted across the causeway into our town.

    (hopes some Davis students read this... ;) )

    --
    -Vendal Thornheart
    1. Re:I thought it was great =) by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you could start a rivalry with Stanislaus State? All you'd have to do is throw turkeys at them.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:I thought it was great =) by Vthornheart · · Score: 1
      ROFL! =) Hey, they're chickens... and we cooked 'em up and ate 'em last semester. =) rofl j/k =)

      Actually, you do bring up a good point... there was a rumor that those chickens were from Davis. I don't know if that's true though, someone from Davis should've owned up to it or spraypainted "Davis" on the chickens or something if Davis wanted credit for the prank. Better luck next time. =)

      --
      -Vendal Thornheart
  91. I don't think anyone really sees it as that by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    They're both good schools, and it's pretty difficult to assign a ranking. Sure, they do largely compete for the same students, but most of the difference between them people use to decide isn't whether one is objectively "better" than the other, but which sort of environment they prefer. For one, they are vastly different in size, have rather different cultures (both among students and especially faculty), and quite different location (suburban LA versus urban Boston).

  92. Source of the laser? by __aaijsn7246 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "The Jacks began searching for the source of our laser, which they shortly found but could not shut off without risking costly damage to MIT equipment."

    Anyone know how this is so?

    1. Re:Source of the laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caltech laser + Caltech alum... ;)

    2. Re:Source of the laser? by i_like_spam · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was superglued to the "Great Sail"??

    3. Re:Source of the laser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A grad student (who had gone to caltech undergrad) was babysitting the projector. The MIT sudents who traced it to its source basically said, "gotcha" and were ready to take the laser (which belonged to an MIT lab), but the grad student shut it off and said he was done. Everyone had a good laugh and left, and then the grad student cleverly turned the projector back on.

      A few indirect methods for killing the projector were considered, but were dismissed as either too risky or ineffective. (For example, flipping a circuit breaker would have been effective, but the possibility of disrupting an experiment collecting data overnight was an unacceptable risk, and hanging a curtain on the outside of the window would be easily circumvented by moving the projector.)

  93. for full disclosure... by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I didn't go to either of them, although I briefly considered both. I ended up going to a school that really does have a bit of an inferiority complex, Harvey Mudd College, although it too is so different as to be hard to compare (undergrad-only; humanities-heavy curriculum; part of a consortium with 4 other undergrad liberal arts colleges).

  94. Who the hell cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is news? The only people who would care about this are Sci or Eng students.

    1. Re:Who the hell cares? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      This is news? The only people who would care about this are Sci or Eng students.

      Including former and wannabe Sci or Eng students, you get 95% of the Slashdot population :P

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  95. Oxford and Cambridge by ettlz · · Score: 1

    And I thought The Boat Race was bad enough.

  96. Try Michigan Engineering!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make you MIT/CIT bitches cry. Damn rich stuck up nerds with no life a serious superiority complex. They don't know the value of hard work.

    1. Re:Try Michigan Engineering!!!!!!! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, rich kids. 72% of whom qualify for need-based financial aid. Damn those rich kids. And 16% of whose families have annual incomes less than MIT's annual costs. Damn those stuck-up rich kids.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  97. Here's Berkeley's graduate rankings by jfern · · Score: 1

    The 5 area rankings are:

    Arts & Sciences #1
    Biological Sciences #5 (after Stanford, MIT, Harvard, UC San Diego)
    Engineering #2 (after MIT)
    Physical Sciences & Math #1
    Social & Behavorial Sciences #1

    Link

  98. Caltech cannon heist by droche · · Score: 5, Interesting

    from: http://people.bu.edu/fmri/somers/cannon.html

    I think the first cannon attempt goes back to '74 or even '72. They once got it on a pickup truck only to break the axle. Another time the fire hose was turned on them. By the mid 80's there was still a buzz about the cannon, but no serious efforts had been made for awhile. Mark Moeglein and I made a trial run as a frosh, with a pick up truck and a pair of bolt cutters, but all we did was cut the lock -- I don't know how we would have gotten it on the truck.

    In '86 I was ASHMC president and had a bit of a prank reputation. ( I was nearly expelled for moving the stakes of New II/ 7th/ Case Dorm early in construction ). Jeff Hong and Steve Olson revived the idea of stealing the cannon and had made a few observational runs. They knew it was a big job and that it would take some money (hopefully ASHMC's) so they brought me in. I got some covert help from the administration -- the phone number of an alum, Bob DePietro, who had a construction engineering company -- and a promise to post bail if we got busted.

    The DePietro connection was critical. We used his name to rent a flat bed truck and a fork lift in Pasadena. I don't think they would have given it to a 21 year college student with a visa card. There were so many logistics. We had to find 2 people with class 2 drivers licences to drive the truck and the fork lift off site -- Greg Felton and Tom Jed.

    We also had the problem of where to park the fork lift. We planned an early Saturday morning raid. But had to pick up the forklift by 5 on Friday. The forklift was huge and clearly could make a trip on the 210 between Claremont and Pasadena. So I scouted around and found some road construction where they left the equipment over night. We picked the fork lift right at 5 and fortunately the work crew quit a little early. Tom Jed just drove it in behind the Pasadena equipment, parked it and took the key. Well, actually it wasn't that simple. Tom ran into a BMW on the way! As we would later discover, the hydrolic steering on the forklift was defective.

    OK, so we had the hardware, but how we're we going to pull it off. We picked an early Saturday morning when most of Fleming House was off on a dorm ski trip. But still we needed cover. We decided to go in daylight and pose as a construction crew. Joe, after a stint in the army, was a bald 27 year-old Mudder. He was made foreman and H&M construction was born. Phony work orders were made and blue workshirts, overalls, and workmen flannels were aqcuired.

    We could not think of one story that would fool everyone, so we came up with two stories. We told campus security that we had be contracted to take the barrel for polishing. There was no way would that the students have bought that lame story. So we told them we're just moving it to get access to a broken water main that was below. Still a little fishy, so we added some decoys. Tom, Steve, and Eric went in 15 minutes before to pose as Caltech students. Two playing catch and one reading. I think this was critical. Each time someone would come along, they would be suspicious. But then they looked around and saw other "techies" who seemed to think all was right so they moved along. And to add insult to injury, Byrne Sanford hid inside the dorm and shot 8 rolls of photos of the whole event.

    Of course it wasn't all so smooth. Campus security was called almost immediately upon our arrival. I thought we were busted. But Joe our foreman played his role beautifully and made our story hold up. Once campus security was pacified, we knew we were going to make it. Also there was a Fleming house frosh who was up early and chatting with us. He gave us a bit of a scare, but by the end he was telling us stories of how people had tried to steal the cannon in the past. Poor frosh.

    Unfortunately, the steering on the forklift was no good and we had to do it by hand -- two of us on each wheel, back and forth trying to back into a corner so we could lift the cannon. The wheels were so rotte

    1. Re:Caltech cannon heist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trouble with pranking the cannon is that noone but Flemming house cares about it, and they're so up-tight that it's not much fun. Anyone else on campus would probably help you prank the cannon (except I think Flemming has it on a "do not prank" list that campus members have to respect). A better target would be some campus icon, like the library, or a student house with a sense of humor (e.g. any other house).

      A great example is when Caltech modified the Hollywood sign. Some Hollywood folk then made some very nice looking signs reading "Hollywood Institute of Technology" and slipped them over signs around the campus. It was easy to miss since they looked about the same as the originial signs, but visitors were terribly confused.

    2. Re:Caltech cannon heist by w3woody · · Score: 1

      Being an on-campus Lloydie (who was, by the way, at the firing end of that damned cannon), I was only too happy to see that cannon go away. Perhaps it's part of the reason why no-one really bothered to stop y'all--because it was the Flem's cannon, and honestly many of us didn't care.

    3. Re:Caltech cannon heist by Merk · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the theft of the U of T goalposts by Queen's University engineers.

    4. Re:Caltech cannon heist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention how long it took you guys to start up the get-away truck. Something about the distributor points, I think? Does clear nail polish ring a bell?

  99. Two "inscription" hacks... You be the judge. by i_like_spam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even though I'm an alum (you guess from where), the following are un-biased examples of inscription hacks.
    (1) recent hack by the west coast school
    (2) a classic inscription hack

    It's clear which of the two is more thoughtful, creative, and true to the spirit of hacking.

    1. Re:Two "inscription" hacks... You be the judge. by Quixote · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but it is one thing for an MIT student to do such a hack; it is entirely another for someone from across the country (literally) do it.

    2. Re:Two "inscription" hacks... You be the judge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      California attitude vs. New England attitude shows. One does just enough to get the meaning across, while another is anal to death..

  100. Fulminate of Estrogen by Lord+Prox · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why does the person wearing the T-shirt in that photo has 2 lumps on his chest?

    That would be a rare example of what is known as a FE-Male. Fulminate of Estrogen infused male. Handle with caution as they can be extremely volatile, but with proper care can be quite nice to have around.

    1. Re:Fulminate of Estrogen by abb3w · · Score: 2, Funny
      Handle with caution as they can be extremely volatile, but with proper care can be quite nice to have around.

      Oh, much like any other high explosives? If you're careful and not unlucky you'll get a great bang?

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    2. Re:Fulminate of Estrogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man-boobs

  101. Re:Geee the definition of pranks has lamed a littl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A standard teenager on a drink up does more exciting and defining pranks than this.

    Real story.
    Poland, students' hostel, one of major universities. 10th floor, party, lots of drinks. The students decide to send a mission to Mars. They find a volunteer, pack him in a cardboard box, write on the box "Mission to Mars" and throw him out through the window.
    People on the street see the corpse in a puddle of blood, call the police, the police starts investigating, they go to the 10th floor, where the party goes on, open the door and see them packing another volunteer into another box, with "rescue mission" written on the side.

  102. All I know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that while MIT is very prestigious, Caltech is far harder to get into. All my friends that were getting into MIT were getting rejected from Caltech. I only knew one person that did make it to caltech; and he was a science god (hacker/ math/chem/physics/cs god)

    Also there's that pejorative rumor that Caltech turns you gay (not that there's anything wrong with that); you have uber-smart but on average socially lacking guys mixed together in a presssurized academic world where you find that's you arent the top dog that you always thought you were. These types of conditions are a recipe for such things. I guess that's better than a reputation that other eng schools have for having their kids kill themselves (most top engineering schools have one every 1-2 years)

  103. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  104. what a bunch of dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a bunch of dorks

  105. Scoreboard hack? by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    From the bottom of the "Overview" page:

    "As a side note, denial of service attacks are lame. Anybody can do that. Wouldn't your time be better spent trying to put a '1' on the scoreboard?"

    The scoreboard on the Home page:

    Caltech - 6 | MIT - 1 :o hacked already, or a mistake on CalTech's part?

    1. Re:Scoreboard hack? by ToteAdler · · Score: 1

      The MIT -1 was most likly for changine their banner from "The other" to "The only". They didn't seem to impressed about what they thought was a DOS.

    2. Re:Scoreboard hack? by Merc+no+Baka · · Score: 1

      That comment was put on the site when the score was still Caltech - 1 | MIT - 0.

      I find it interesting that you can go to the site, report the current score, and still not capitalize Caltech properly in the rest of your post. :)

  106. there's MORE images that weren't posted by krunk4ever · · Score: 2, Informative

    balloons in the dome at night
    palm trees inside "Tomb of the Unkown Tool"
    a full shot of someone wearing the shirt
    a the only institute of technology retaliation
    prank signature on white board

    and the spelling of CALTECH:
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/lase r/c.jpg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser /a.jpg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser/ l.jpg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser/t .jpg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser/e. jpg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser/c.j pg
    http://www.its.caltech.edu/~gremmer/laser/h.jp g

    1. Re:there's MORE images that weren't posted by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Tomb of the Unknown Tool is somewhere 2 floors down in the cellars, so no, these are the palms that accompanied "The Other institute"...

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  107. Re:So.. by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    But perhaps it's stuff that matters.

    Somehow.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  108. Re:34A by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all engineers/nerds are guys.

    Some of them are girls.

    Gosh you're a sexist pig.

  109. Re:CIT...? SFIT please by multiplexer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ETH Zürich > MIT > University of Botswana > Caltech

  110. Breasts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MIT has them, but Caltech has not.

  111. Re:CIT...? SFIT please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what (or more who) I know, it seems that ETHZ is faaaaar away in term of humor (but are less arrogant as well).

  112. In nonexclusive colleges it's a crime to prank... by edgedmurasame · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...but here it's an expectation? Well, I guess this is what you get for giving these places the "rich man's loophole" by making it a nice large (and possibly price fixed) admission fee that's conditionally waived for the undeserving. Now when some Ohio State (or even better, Wright State) students would return the favor for the Wright Flyer stunt at MIT, that'd be news, not some high-tax state that caters to the same crowd as MIT's nearby neighbors, also home to Caltech's evil neighbors.

    --
    "Forget the engineers." -Carly Fiorina, briber of MIT Technology Review.
  113. Obviously a fake... by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

    The person modeling the T-shirt has too many curves.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  114. grammar nit again by tomstdenis · · Score: 0

    "A full account of the pranks is located at ..." ... "has been located at" is the correct wording.

    But even that sounds wrong since "locate" means to determine a specific area/place/etc...

    I'd say

    "has been stored at "

    or

    "has been made available through " ...

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  115. Lame copycatting by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    The T-shirt concept has been used in the MIT-Harvard rivalry for *years*. Can't fin a picture but here's a reference.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  116. This must be an inverse contest by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

    I guess that this must be an inverse contest. Whoever wins will prove that they spend too much valuable time thinking about pranks instead of getting an education.

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
  117. Unnecessary by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Being that caltech is so much better than MIT you would think that they could find a good spell checker...

    Nah, we can always hire someone like you to do it for $22K/yr.

  118. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by mangu · · Score: 1
    we can chat about what the school in Eastern Timor did this weekend, or maybe the University in Argentina


    Sure, by the time when the total contribution to human science created by the Eastern Timor school or the University of Argentina becomes as significant as those of MIT and Caltech, then I'm sure we will read a lot about them.

  119. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    perhaps we can chat about what the school in Eastern Timor did this weekend, or maybe the University in Argentina, maybe read about those wacky people at Mumbai uni are up to this weekend

    Then start your own website. FWIW, your country doesn't have a single university as good as Caltech OR MIT. And I don't even have to ask where you're from before making that determination.

  120. Haha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They distributed shirts with MIT on the front and '...because not everyone can go to Caltech' on the back."

    What a prank! Those whacky nerds! (slaps his knee!)

  121. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by belg4mit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Approximately 1/4 of Engineers are foreigners, so it may just be that some of the people who run your country or it's large companies went to MIT.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  122. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't Caltech and MIT often exchange idiotic pranks like this? Since when was this news?

  123. I didn't see any of this ... by magefile · · Score: 1

    And I was there from Thursday to Sunday. Not saying it didn't happen, just that it wasn't very obvious. The a capella choirs' concert (the closing event) was hacked though - a banner dropped down with some pictures of beavers & such. It read, "MIT: more dome for your dollar, more beaver for your [can't remember], more bang for your buck".

  124. s/week/weak/ by emidln · · Score: 1

    that is all

  125. And as a followup to that prank.... by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...Dave Rosum, Emu founder and Caltech Alum, hacked the Rosebowl scoreboard when Nixon was in office. The hack was going to display various Caltech-centric messages on the scoreboard as the game progressend. To make it difficult to disable, Rosum hid his hacked circuits in a tube and buried the tube in a bunch of cables.

    Nixon was a big football fan and decided to go see the Rosebowl game that year which meant the Secret Service had to scour the Rosebowl. As part of their checkout, they powered up the scoreboard and because Rosum had scrimped on his relays, they blew his circuit out. Debugging the blown scoreboard led them to his fried, and smoking, circuit. That would have been the end of it except some other Techies decided independently to pull the same prank. Except they didn't know the Secret Service was waiting for the first prankster to come fix his prank. Guess who ended up getting caught?

    1. Re:And as a followup to that prank.... by slew · · Score: 1

      Well, eventually that prank happened...

      1984 Rose Bowl football game between UCLA and Illinois, at which Caltech undergraduates -- lacking a football team of their own -- hacked into the scoreboard to make it read "Caltech 38, MIT 9".

      Here's a reasonable account of this...

      Throughout the last few months, we have been dismayed at the number of factual errors in newspaper stories related to this year's Rose Bowl stunt. ... we, the Caltech students responsible, would like to clear up some points which have been misrepresented.

      We installed a device to take over control of the Rose Bowl scoreboard weeks before the actual game without the knowledge of any Caltech staff or faculty. Our only modification to their equipment was a splice in the cable to the scoreboard where we attached our microprocessor. During the game, we placed several messages such as "Go Caltech!" on the scoreboard. The frustrated stadium officials responded by turning off the power to the scoreboard before the game was over. There was no malfunction of either the stadium computer or our device.

      In the days following the game, we contacted the Rose Bowl officials and offered to remove our device and to explain how we had gained control. This offer was ignored by the Rose Bowl officials and the city of Pasadena. Unfortunately, the Rose Bowl officials did not understand that our project had made no modifications to their computer, as we would have told them. They needlessly spent $1200 in shipping costs to have it checked out. There was, of course, no damage and hence no repairs necessary to either their computer or scoreboard. All that really had to be done was to unplug a connector we had installed. The figure of $4000 printed by newspapers was an exaggerated estimate from the start.

      Weeks later the City Prosecutor of Pasadena, against the recommendation of the Mayor and the City Council, charged us with four misdemeanors. We read this news on the front page of the Los Angeles Times five days before we received actual notification by mail from the city clerk. When articles questioning the city's sense of humor appeared in local papers, he tried to defend his actions by writing to local newspapers. Apparently the city did not consider this appropriate; his office, previously independent, has since been placed under the authority of the City Attorney.

      In cooperation with the city of Pasadena, Caltech agreed to share half the amount needlessly spent by the Rose Bowl on their computer. This amount of $660 was paid by Caltech to the Rose Bowl. It was mentioned in court, and the newspapers erroneously reported it as a fine to us as individuals. The City Prosecutor dropped every charge against us,
      except for the insignificant "loitering in a public place after midnight." We pleaded no contest to this charge, and there was no sentence. It was agreed that this also will shortly be dropped from our record.

      We have been surprised by the amount of attention which several newspapers and television stations have given to these events
      regarding the Rose Bowl. We have been disappointed that there have been several misconceptions and misquotes conveyed to the public. We hope that with more serious matters, journalists will take more care to report stories accurately and to avoid sensationalism.

      Conclusion: Don't believe everything you read in newspapers. ... deleted the names ...

    2. Re:And as a followup to that prank.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. That really happened. It was a lot
      of fun. I still have the schematics for the
      computer we built and inserted inline in the cable
      from the control unit to the scoreboard.

      This is the first I ever heard of the
      Dave Rossum scoreboard thing. Is the
      poster sure that wasn't just a bad dream
      brought on by too much tequila?

  126. i wonder... by ballsanya · · Score: 2, Funny

    if messing with so many asian kids is considered a hate crime...

  127. Didn't happen like that by benj_e · · Score: 0

    The Chronicle of Higher Ed reported on that the reported prank didn't go so well. Seems that the Harvard students moved around from their assigned seating and the cards didn't produce anything readable.

    --
    The Tao that can be spoken is not the one eternal Tao
  128. Your realize, of course... by mi · · Score: 1

    This means WAR...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  129. No it wasn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was filmed at Occidental College, near Caltech, and at Pomona College in Claremont. But the "Pacific Tech" in the movie was obviously intended to portray Caltech, and the movie has many Caltech references.

    (By the way, the frozen ice that turns directly to gas is dry ice, carbon dioxide.)

  130. MIT's revenge by mi · · Score: 1
    To return the "favor", MIT can just name their next droid "Calltech" (or "CIT"):
    Although it is clunky and still far from perfection, we all love this creature, and it can already do all these exciting tricks. We decided to call it "Calltech".
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  131. ILL by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

    INI

    As a product of UIUC working for Cornell, and a former employee of a company that employees hundreds of MIT grads (mostly from the prestigous MIT Gas Turbine Lab). I have to say, you are almost exactly right.

    I'd say the top 10% at UIUC are roughly equivilant to the top 20-30% at MIT (and the bottom 20% of UIUC engineering/physics would never get in the door at MIT). Not everyone at MIT is great, but they do have a higher rate...

    --
    "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
  132. Two Things by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 1
    1) "We suspect that some Jacks had been DOS-ing the site in order to cause it to overflow and shutdown"

    No, whoever posted the story to Slashdot is the one that is DOS-ing your site.

    2) "our group bribed two kids with a stereo into playing the Ride of the Valkyries, Caltech's song"

    The Valkyries were the ones who carried the dead from the battlefield (and into heaven if i'm not mistaken). If they tried that garbage at my school they had better bring their own Valkries to clean up the mess.

    --
    I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
  133. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    wha?

    What the hell is wrong with "is located at"?

    "has been located at" doesn't even mean the same thing.
    Unless you're making a weak slashdotting joke by your insistence at past tense, the present tense is perfectly correct, and the use of active voice far preferable to the passive voice you seem to be insisting on.

    Compare the original sentence and your preferred replacement:
    "A full account of the pranks is located at www.caltechvsmit.com"
    "A full account of the pranks has been made available through www.caltechvsmit.com"

    See how much more concise and to the point the original is?
    There are no prizes for wordiness, and "through" is just wrong anyway.
    A web site (note the use of the word "site") is considered to be a location (albeit a virtual one), not a service, therefore "located at" is perfectly fine.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  134. QED wasn't at Caltech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Feynman came to Caltech in 1950. He published his main papers on QED and Feynman diagrams in 1947/1948, when he was still at Cornell. Many of his ideas came out of his Ph.D. work with Wheeler at Princeton, although some of the ideas go back even to his undergrad days at MIT, according to his Nobel lecture.

  135. Re:CIT...? SFIT please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ETH Zürich > MIT > University of Botswana > Caltech


    ETH who? Hmmm.. sounds like the wind.. nothing of consequence.
  136. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    What the hell is wrong with "is located at"?

    The "is" and "located" don't match in tense. That's like saying "He is medicated yesterday."

    Saying "He is medicated" is also incorrect [for the same reason].

    It's "yet another english thingy that became the norm". In reality the guy put the thing up available at that address in the PAST. He's not still putting it up there...

    So

    "It was made available at ..." is actually correct.

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  137. Feynman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He did his undergrad at MIT. Remember? MIT populates the faculty of other schools.

  138. This is by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

    This their verison of the NCAA Champsionship!

    --
    In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
  139. Caltech's just being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They confuse being Slashdotted for a DOS.

    1. Re:Caltech's just being silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes... we here at Caltech are sooo stupid that when all the traffic a day before we were slashdotted came from 4 IP's from MIT sending DDOS packets we assumed it was a DDOS attack. So obviously we should have known that all this traffic was coming from the future existence of the site on Slashdot. Good call.

      I am so happy people like you exist otherwise the world might actually accomplish something.

  140. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Kombat · · Score: 0, Troll

    FWIW, your country doesn't have a single university as good as Caltech OR MIT. And I don't even have to ask where you're from before making that determination.

    Now that's just steroetypical American arrogance rearing its ugly head again. And you wonder why the rest of the world hates you.

    FYI, there are actually a lot of other countries out there as good or better than MIT or Caltech. Of course, they're found in obscure, little-known countries like India, China, Britain, and Canada, but they're out there.

    Perhaps if your "super-elite, best-in-the-world" US colleges focused a little more on their geography classes instead of their patriotism classes, you'd know that.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  141. As a Massachusetts citizen by Patrick+Mannion · · Score: 1

    Who takes pride in it and loves technolgy and wishes he could go to MIT. I say that MIT hacks are way much better. Though, now is the time to strike back, MIT! INVADE TEH CALTECH CAMPUS!!!!

    --
    In America, you spam computers In Soviet Russia, computers spam you!
  142. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Kombat · · Score: 1

    At the risk of incurring the wrath of a grammer flame, a minor correction to my post:

    "there are actually a lot of other countries out there with colleges as good or better than MIT or Caltech."

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  143. Spelling - alas, it's Cal Tech by jfaughnan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the 1980s I wrote a letter to Scientific American complaining about their spelling of Caltech.

    They wrote back and told me I was wrong -- the official abbreviation is Cal Tech. Sigh. At least as of 1980 they were right and I was wrong.

    I doubt that's changed.

    We all used Caltech (t-shirts, stationery, etc) -- but technically it's probably still Cal Tech.

    In the 80s we did use CIT on occasion.

    As to the MIT/Caltech comparisons, I think most people who know both would agree that the 'top 120 SAT scorers' in an MIT class are very comparable in personality and academic inclinations to a Caltech class (used to be about 120). MIT, however, has another pool of students that's more diverse and not as physics-focused as the Caltech students. I do think we were (still are based on the single visit I've made back there in 25 years) the geekiest student body that ever lived. (When I was a member of the Caltech Y I championed a "Nerd Pride" event. If you can't beat it ...)

    --
    John Faughnan
    jfaughnan@spamcop.net
    1. Re:Spelling - alas, it's Cal Tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the 1980s I wrote a letter to Scientific American complaining about their spelling of Caltech.

      They wrote back and told me I was wrong -- the official abbreviation is Cal Tech. Sigh. At least as of 1980 they were right and I was wrong.

      I doubt that's changed.

      We all used Caltech (t-shirts, stationery, etc) -- but technically it's probably still Cal Tech.


      Check out http://www.caltech.edu if you have any doubt -- On the front page it's called "Caltech". I've been on campus for 14 years now, and have only ever seen outsiders use "Cal Tech". It always irks me -- why, I don't know.
  144. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    To help you out...[since I know you still don't understand]

    "locate" is a verb. That is to find something.

    Location is a noun.

    "It is located" is wrong. "Its location is" is correct.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  145. MOD Patent Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Caltech /had/ some talent... (Score:4, Interesting)
    by _defiant_ (120560) on Monday April 11, @03:36AM (#12198479)

    Complete rip off not of the above post but the entire article it links to.

  146. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by mabinogi · · Score: 1

    It may be a correct sentence, but it screwed up the meaning, and the meaning is far more important that finer points of style.

    >In reality the guy put the thing up available at that address in the PAST. He's not still putting it up there...

    The original message says nothing about the act of putting up the page - because no one cares about that.
    It tells you where you can find it _now_ - which is what we do care about.

    "was made available at" tells you nothing about where you can get it now.

    You could make two changes to the original sentence that would improve its style without losing the meaning.

    Drop "located" -
    "A full account of the pranks is at www.caltechvsmit.com"
    Or change located to available as you suggested, but without screwing with the tense -
    "A full account of the pranks is available at www.caltechvsmit.com"

    The first is probably preferable as it's more concise.

    In any case, we're talking about a slashdot submission here, it's informal speech and no one cares whether or not it meets the highest levels of style.
    As long as it's clear, says what it means, and spelt right. Bad spelling is far less acceptable than not adhering to a style guide, and attempts to improve the style that sacrifice meaning do not help anyone.

    --
    Advanced users are users too!
  147. MIT's Response by crl620 · · Score: 1

    MIT should send Caltech a girl...or maybe a picture of a social interaction. Also, it should be noted that MIT hackers promptly changed the banner "the other" to "the only."

  148. Yeah, that was a lovely crayon poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woot woot! Way to go MIT. Very impressive.

  149. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by MagicBox · · Score: 1

    I know this is stupid, but I'll make my comment:
    is medicated != is located
    is - present tense, which means that as of right now, as of the time of this writing
    example:
    The building is located at ............
    or
    the information is lacated at this web site....
    as the previous writer wrote, a web site is a virtual location (remember the URL?)

    It is true that the information WAS PUT up there at some point in the past, but that is irrelevant to us. We are only concerned with where the information is LOCATED, not when the information WAS UPLOADED to this specific LOCATION.

    When we're referring to a person BEING MEDICATED we cannot say is medicated. So we use IS BEING MEDICATED (if the patient is still under treatment. So you arte comparing two different things.

    "it was made available..." is correct, but that doesn't mean "is located at..." or you can "find it at...." is incorrect. In fact they are more correct than "it was made available...."

    --

    The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  150. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    locate ... IS A VERB!!! "located" is past tense!!!

    "its location is" is what "is located at" means. Just because it's common doesn't mean it's proper.

    "is" is a present tense VERB... He is here. He was here, he will be here, etc.

    So in summary, locate == verb, location == noun

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  151. too bad in Canada... by xRelisH · · Score: 1

    The University seems to look down upon pranks. Here at U of Waterloo, they look down upon pranks that are even just contained within the University.

  152. Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by swb · · Score: 1

    They would take down those balloons easily.

    Even better would be selling the right to shoot them down and using the money for some charity.

    Even a novice should be able to hit a balloon with a scoped pellet gun.

    1. Re:Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a skylight behind the balloons; shooting up at glass is a bad idea.

    2. Re:Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Even better would be selling the right to shoot them down and using the money for some charity.

      Who would pay for the repairs to the glass skylight in the ceiling? I.e. the one the ballons are directly underneath?

      Seems to me as if Caltech is admitting that their own campus is so lame that they have to MIT to hack. Perhaps some of the pre-freshers will think up their own reply.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by swb · · Score: 1

      Who would pay for the repairs to the glass skylight in the ceiling? I.e. the one the ballons are directly underneath?

      Since it's MIT, I'd guess that physics was one of the courses offered.

      A .177 caliber pellet fired upward shouldn't have enough terminal energy to damage the skylights, especially if you hit the baloon. Remember, skylights must be designed to absorb the energy of random stuff falling on them, like at least marble-sized hail, ice blown from adjacent rooftops, birds, and so on.

    4. Re:Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      A .177 caliber pellet fired upward shouldn't have enough terminal energy to damage the skylights, especially if you hit the baloon. Remember, skylights must be designed to absorb the energy of random stuff falling on them, like at least marble-sized hail, ice blown from adjacent rooftops, birds, and so on.

      No they are not. The 'skylight' in question is a stained glass decorative overlay. Above that there is a difuser and above that there is the actual skylight. The skylight has been damaged during previous hacks so I see no reason at all to be so sure that it would not be damaged by a pellet fired at it.

      The balloons would deflate of their own accord within a week. If there was a need to remove the balloons earlier the obvious approach would be to get another balloon, tie a string to it and attach a tack or series of tacks to the top of it.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    5. Re:Don't they have pellet guns at MIT? by swb · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize it was decorative/antique/fragile like that. I've walked around MIT (5-6 years ago), but I don't remember anything specific about the buildings.

  153. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just because it's "proper" doesn't mean it's _right_.

  154. Pictures of the Yale prank here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    To the person who said that the cards weren't readable: some pictures at the prank website. Definitely legible.

    1. Re:Pictures of the Yale prank here by mclove · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's because they were Photoshopped.

    2. Re:Pictures of the Yale prank here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I was at the game. It was definitely legible.

  155. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    yeah who neededs correct grammar when posteding. Cuz anything has fly!

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  156. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Informative
    Now that's just steroetypical American arrogance rearing its ugly head again. And you wonder why the rest of the world hates you.

    Is it still arrogant if it's true?

    FYI, there are actually a lot of other countries out there as good or better than MIT or Caltech. Of course, they're found in obscure, little-known countries like India, China, Britain, and Canada, but they're out there.

    Names? As for England, Cambridge and Oxford are very good, both in the top 10 in a lot of fields. But Britain goes down fast after that. China's rising but not there yet, same for India. Canada doesn't have that many good schools, none of their best would top our top 20. That includes, for example, UToronto. You failed to mention Germany and Japan which would likely provide the best competition to the US, actually, after Britain.

    Here's a list of the top schools compiled by a Chinese university: ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2004/top500(1-100).pdf. I deliberately chose a non-American source to prevent any "bias.". Of the top 25, 18 are American. That's not the only authority, of course, but I'd love to see any measure in which well over half the world's top universities weren't in the US.

    Perhaps if your "super-elite, best-in-the-world" US colleges focused a little more on their geography classes instead of their patriotism classes, you'd know that.

    I'm familiar with many institutions across the world (and quite good at geography). And I've never seen one that profs in the sciences would routinely choose a job at as opposed to any of the top 5 US schools (say MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Berkeley, Stanford). The only ones that would offer competition would be Oxford and Cambridge. And I'm quite familiar with this situation. Probably different in liberal arts, but not science.

    You may not like it - but it IS true.

  157. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by smithmc · · Score: 1

    At the risk of incurring the wrath of a grammer flame, a minor correction to my post:

    How about a spelling flame? "Grammer"? You mean like the guy who played Frasier?

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  158. Re:34A by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    Bah you idiot - you must be an American we are talking about here - i mean ignorant and presumptuous. That was supposed to be funny for all the other geeks. Pffft - disrespectful? How the fuck would anyone know she's "active" on the /. circle and why the fuck would i know. Oh lord - go get a life you geek.

  159. The Gauntlet by Illix · · Score: 2, Informative
    Having been there when the gauntlet was thrown down (and sadly having been a victim of the t-shirt prank), I can tell you that a) most of the prefrosh weren't entirely aware that anything was going on and b) it took a while for MIT to react because it was hard for anyone to imagine that Caltech undergrads would fly cross country just to harass us.


    The pranks were not as bad as they seem to have been reported. The balloons did go up under the dome, but very few people noticed them. The palm tree also went up on the dome, but it was not up there for more than a few minutes before it was retrieved and spray-painted white to appear covered in snow. The t-shirts were handed out at the Academic Fair which a fair number of prefrosh didn't even go to, and the laser on the side of the Green Building...well, let's just say I witnessed a few people departing to make that guy's life miserable. The banner reading "That Other [Institute of Technology]" was also rapidly counter-hacked to read "The Only [Institute of Technology]".



    It took a while for people to realize that Caltech students really had taken the time to fly out here and bother us (the smart money was originally on Caltech alumni at the grad school). MIT may have a rivalry with Caltech, but it's quite far away and not supported by any sort of sports team encounters. Caltech may have only MIT to focus on, but MIT spends a lot of its energy harassing Harvard, which has the advantages of being easily mocked and just down the road. Caltech has had some great hacks in the past - the Rose Bowl prank, the Hollywood sign - but MIT has a greater culture of regular hacking that involves much of the community. Thus, it's a little surprising that Caltech would throw down the gauntlet like this...and the invitation to prank their prefrosh weekend can mean only trouble.


    But it would probably be trouble for Caltech. They seem to have invested a lot of pride in this, but most of the prefrosh at least didn't even know it was happening. If MIT heads to Caltech and gets humiliated, Caltech might be cheering but the rest of MIT might not even know about it. I hope they know what they're getting in to.

  160. UPenn vs Penn State by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    a lot of people seem to confuse University of Pennsylvania (in Philadelphia) with Penn State.... or they do not realize it is two unrelated schools. when i hear somebody just say "Penn" i assume they mean University of Pennsylvania, but i live in Philadelphia.
    while Penn State's main campus is in State College, PA... they have satellite campuses all over the place. that may help with the confusion?

  161. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Kombat · · Score: 1

    You may not like it - but it IS true.

    No, it's not. I'll even use your own source to prove you wrong (your link is broken, by the way). The original poster said:

    your country doesn't have a single university as good as Caltech OR MIT.

    Well, according to your list, the University of Cambridge (in the UK) ranks higher than both MIT and Caltech.

    So the original poster was wrong, according to your own data.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  162. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by beeblebrox87 · · Score: 1

    Actually, if he was British you might be wrong, but Slashdot covers their hacks too, so you both have somewhat flawed arguments.

  163. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Well, according to your list, the University of Cambridge (in the UK) ranks higher than both MIT and Caltech.

    Yeah, I took a gamble poster wasn't British. I'll obviously concede Oxford and Cambridge are both great universities. Though I would contend that after that, things fall quickly.

    Main point stands, though. The majority of the world's best universities, especially at the top, are in the US.

    I hope that changes, honestly, and I say that as an American. Not because the world sends its best and brightest here (I actually like how multicultural that works out), but because more education is good for everybody. Europe is quickly falling behind - particularly the Continent - and India is quickly gaining. China will too, and Japan is already there.

    Compare this to before WWII years ago, when Britain and Germany were dominant, America had a few good world-class schools, and India, China and Japan weren't on the map.

  164. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by 3.1415926535 · · Score: 1

    Dude, chill, it's also an adjective!

    "Steve located Dave's VCR" -- past participle of locate
    "Dave's VCR is located at Steve's cafe" -- adjective

    Try using a dictionary sometime.

  165. This is certain to escalate. by Bnderan · · Score: 1

    This business will get out of control. It will get out of control and we'll all be lucky to live through it.

  166. /.ing by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    We suspect that some Jacks had been DOS-ing the site in order to cause it to overflow and shutdown we would like to say that DOS-ing is not productive, not funny, and is not in any way under the code of conduct of pranks or hacks, and is in fact quite illegal.

    Then they put it on Slashdot...

  167. Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, does anyone give a shit about this?

  168. Re:The Last Caltech/MIT prank... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

    And MIT did it to Harvard first. (#7) They weren't even original in their choice of schools.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  169. 2.5" by porcupine8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's how long this poster's penis is. I read the post and guessed the size of his organ.

    --
    Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  170. 1957 by Tungbo · · Score: 1

    was when the laser was invited at Bell Labs. That is old news.

    While it is true that research University such as MIT focus more on their grad students than undergrads, there are opportunities for motivated undergrads to get involved with cutting edge research. MIT had a Undergrad Research Opportunity Program for many years. It is up to the students how much they want to take advantage of it.

    You must pick the right school for your own interests and abilities. However, one would make better choices after collecting accurate facts to support the decision.

  171. Kind of like Canada making fun of the US isn't it? by sachemcst · · Score: 1

    Ok, so that was a more relevent statement pre-2001. You know what I'm saying though.

  172. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by JadeNB · · Score: 1
    Here are two quotes from the OED.
    Be it enacted..That the ground to be appropriated to the purpose of building thereon a capitol..shall be located on Shockoe hill.
    Said insurance company shall be located and kept in the town of Salem
    Surely, if it is possible that something shall be located in, on or at a place, it is possible that that thing is located in, on or at a place. The statement in question, it seems to me, is that the document has its location at the indicated site (which is happening in the present), not that it was placed there (which happened in the past).
  173. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure if I would trust this listing. I'm Canadian and the ordering of the universities in Canada is a little odd, although I am not sure what the criteria was. The other oddity is that it is supposedly a list of the top 100 (1-100) but it only lists 99. Seems like a fairly amateur publication.

    The ranking of a University is pretty objective, it all depends what you think is important.

  174. Go Irish! by writertype · · Score: 1

    *adds Samari711 to friends list*

    Go Irish!

  175. I thought the point of pranks was to be clever... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    I always thought that the point of a prank was to be clever or to be funny, preferably both. Most of these "pranks" really are neither. They fall into the category of either "who cares?" or "I'm being a dick!". Please, Caltech, strive for humor or cleverness. This series of "pranks" seem more like the kind a petulant child would play rather than students/graduates at one of the premier technical schools in our nation.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  176. Malfunctioning Weather Machine by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    That's funny, when I went there for Campus Preview Weekend only three years ago it rained the first day (and I mean it poured). Another night it snowed. And it was windy and cloudy most of the time when it wasnt precipitating. I don't know what else to say, so I'll just let the facts speak for themselves.

    1. Re:Malfunctioning Weather Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it's set to do that that whenever someone completely devoid of a sense of humor is around. so i'll just let that fact speak for itself.

  177. President's office disappear? by Merk · · Score: 1

    Ooooooh... they put a big bulletin board on the wall in front of his door. How innovative!

    Puleeeez. Aren't these guys supposed to be engineers?

    On April 1, 1997 Sci'97 successfully staged one of the funniest and most memorable Year Pranks on record. The preparations for this event had begun two years earlier. However, the plans were not executed until the wee hours that night at the end of fourth year when elite battalions of Sci'97s dispersed across campus. By dawn, everything was in place. Among the most visible pranks were:

    • A 5-foot high digital clock, blinking "12:00", placed on the picturesque Grant Hall clock tower. At regular intervals an extraordinarily loud alarm would ring across campus. Unless the "snooze" button attached at the bottom of Grant Hall was pressed the alarm would continue.
    • Closure of the Faculty of Applied Science in Ellis Hall. The office was boarded up and a note was attached to the new "wall" stating that the Queen's engineering program had been terminated due to financial cutbacks. Only Sci'97 would be allowed to graduate.
    • A letter to all the engineering frosh advising them that the Faculty of Applied Science had lost its accreditation, and they must transfer into Arts and Science.
    • A much needed obstacle in the JDUC. The vital passage between the Info Bank and copy centre was completely sealed.
    • A new "tree" on campus. Last year, a tree in front of the JDUC was removed so a new electronic billboard display could be built. Sci'97 covered the sign in paper mache to make it look like a tree.
    • Purple snow on University Avenue.
    • Banners in Stauffer Library that remembered patrons that all library fines were payable to Sci'97.

    [Link]

    I can't find pictures of the Grant Hall alarm clock, but here's Grant Hall to give you some idea of the scale of the alarm clock.

    And that wall built in the JDUC (John Deutsch University Centre) was a full-scale drywall wall, painted to match the surroundings, hung with posters and other things, and generally made to look exactly like the walls next to it.

    This is on top of individual departments doing their own thing. The physics department (i.e. me and some buds) made the physics lounge (a little sitting room) into a real lounge. We "borrowed" all kinds of fun things from the labs upstairs, physics labs and dance clubs having so much in common: lasers, strobe lights, clouds of liquid nitrogen vapours, etc.

    Other years did similar fun things, like taking apart a car and rebuilding it around a light post, or rebuilding it inside a building on a second floor balcony.

    Compared to that, putting a bulletin board in front of a guy's office is rather lame.

  178. Actually by kf6auf · · Score: 1

    we "downsized" our President's office which we thought was a more productive way of complaining about budget cuts and tuition increases than making it disappear entirely. While I cannot find the pictures at the moment, we basically turned his office into a shack and gave him an upside-down trash can as a chair and so on. And yes, we haven't transformed a building into a cathedral, but can you imagine getting that much stuff across country? Be realistic please.

  179. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Stop proving there are limits to my madness! ;-)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  180. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by bondjamesbond · · Score: 1

    Yes, well, Mr. "Kombat", YOUR country's space shuttles are SO much nicer than our space shuttles. And YOUR Mars rover is so much nicer than OUR Mars rover (race you for pink slips). And YOUR software companies are SO much bigger than OUR software companies. And YOUR standard of living is SO much higher than OURs. I know, I know - stereotypical arrogance (actually, I think our arrogance is greater than the aggregate stereotype). But it's just because we're BETTER than you. So get over it.

  181. prank! by zahl2 · · Score: 1

    I've often thought that Harvey Mudd and University of Chicago ought to prank each other.

  182. Re:I thought the point of pranks was to be clever. by Vagodin · · Score: 1
    I don't think you know what you're talking about. Not all the pranks were terribly "technical," but I think quite a few were "clever," including the whole concept of going out there for prefrosh weekend when access, blending in, and frosh stealing are easiest.

    Come on, giving away free shirts to their prefrosh that say MIT on one side (when handed the shirts, wrapped in plastic, they looked like normal MIT shirts) and "...because not everybody can go to Caltech" (which is true) on the other! That's awesome. And clever. The shirts have been made before (we've had the same shirt made by individuals around Caltech for quite some time, and I think MIT at one point sold the opposite shirt in their store), but the execution and timing were quite clever.

    Admit it. Now. For the children.

  183. Public universities by elong87 · · Score: 1

    Well, if all of the smarty pants at the various Institutes of Technology have time to leave their books and pull some pranks, they should have enough time to do something a little more creative like invent a cure for cancer or make a better transistor like the folks at University of Illinois, or an operating system like a poor Finish boy, or drop out and start a software company like the richest man in the world, or just stop being snobbish dorks and go _____________ (Fill in the blank with your own obnoxious saying). And that completes the longest run-on sentence.

  184. Re:In nonexclusive colleges it's a crime to prank. by Subrafta · · Score: 1

    Don't the T-shirts that say "Wright State" (front) "Wrong School" (back) count? That's at least as clever as "not everyone can go to Caltech", and I think you can still buy them at the Universtity of Dayton bookstore...

    --
    Vuja De: That sinking feeling that this is going to happen again. Often occurs in meetings with Product Managers.
  185. probably because of green dragon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I digress...

    They did actually try interhovse with a fence around it for another year (to keep out the drunk highschoolers who were most of the troublemakers), but alas that worked about as well as the concrete wall around berlin...

    Sigh, another fine tradition down the dumpers...

  186. actually the humanities are pretty good there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the courses they offer and the professors they have it's pretty good...

    But of course it's really too small a school to be competitive in that respect (e.g., theater offerings are community theater level), so you really have to go off campus to get anything decent (Pasadena City College, Occidental, etc)... Fortunatly, caltech offers credit if you are so motivated, but unforutnatly, it's hard to be that motivated in Lost Angeles...

  187. Re:news for americans stuff that 191 countries don by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > FWIW, your country doesn't have a single university as good as Caltech OR MIT. And I don't even have to ask where you're from before making that determination.

    And you Americans wonder why the rest of the world can't stand you.

    Drop the arrogance for a while. The best ranked engineering schools are not in the USA.

  188. Re:I thought the point of pranks was to be clever. by Illix · · Score: 1

    Many of the pranks are just to get Caltech's name out...the point of Prefrosh weekend is to help undecided prefrosh pick a school, and there are a fair amount who have a choice between MIT and Caltech. If it appears that Caltech is smart enough to prank MIT with impunity, it will convince some undecideds that Caltech really is the place with the better education, a fact that previous posters have mentioned is much more important to Caltech (~200 undergrads per class) than it is to MIT (~1000 undergrads per class).

  189. Famous two liner: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    IMPEACH NIXON

    Displayed ten stories up for all the city to see, in 1972.

    --J. Random Troll (BS 1977)

  190. Re:actually the humanities are pretty good there.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The humanities are really quite good and interesting at Caltech, they're just not broad. The faculty are incredible but the classes that are offered (outside the core) will be very pointed towards what faculty are teaching that term and what they work in. For example, at one point there was one law class, on communications law. Bruce Cain, probably the star Political Science guy on the west coast, was a professor there for many years before he moved north to UC Berkeley. There are many nationally known profs in the department. One of the big projects at the moment is improving election methodology, a perfect fit.

    Also, the advanced classes at Caltech are very small - less than 10 students is common.

    Caltech students also have exchange privileges at the Art Center College of Design, something I wish I had followed up on.

    Sports, theater, and activities may not be national level most of the time, but there were many enthusiastic participants, and always a mix of skill levels.

  191. Caltech has played many games in the Rose Bowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It used to be their home stadium.

    Course, it isn't an NCAA team.

  192. Nerds Vs. Nerds??? by speedplane · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the two nerd schools team up and pull pranks on a jock school? All of this seems so counter-productive.

    --
    Fast Federal Court and I.T.C. updates
  193. Re:grammar nit again - bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up, you goddamned pedant.

  194. Re:34A by joulesm · · Score: 1

    /. is her homepage.

  195. Photo of One of the Pranksters by lofi-rev · · Score: 1

    With the prank images hosted in ~gremmer it wasn't too hard to dig up likely prankster Isaac Nielsen Gremmer and his residence, with a map to his room.