Slashdot Mirror


Help Solve the Mystery of the Pioneer Anomaly

deglr6328 writes "Very soon, NASA will be dismantling and scrapping its only computer left which is able to access and process the data on its ancient 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes. "Who cares", you say? Well, the Planetary Society for one and they're hoping you might care as well. The data held on these (few hundred) tapes is no ordinary forgettable data, it is the complete archive of the first 15 years of all the data returned to Earth by the Pioneer spacecraft which were sent into interstellar space. This additional and thus far unexamined data (the data after 1988 is available and has already been examined) may hold the key to solving what is considered one of the top problems in physics today, the so called Pioneer anomaly, where the observed trajectory of these spacecraft (and a couple others) deviates noticeably from our very precise expectation. The reason for the anomaly may be as mundane as uneven radiation pressure or escaping thruster fuel or it may be as groundbreaking as a clue to completely new physics, perhaps related to dark matter or dark energy. The Planetary Society is planning on recovering this data and poring over it meticulously to look for something which may have been missed or hidden from current investigations into the phenomenon. They need money to do this, about $250,000, and are asking for donations to fund the project. You do not need to be a member to donate. There are no serious proposals to send any more spin-stabilized spacecraft on solar escape trajectories any time in the near future and this is probably the only tenable method we have to directly investigate this mystery in the interim."

473 comments

  1. It's obviously an alien plot. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Funny

    1.Deviate spacecrafts from their precisely-planned flightpaths
    2.???
    3.Profit!

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      speaking of 'profit'...

      One thing that *most* charitable donations allow is designating which fund your money should go towards.

      Looking at the donation page, there's no reference as to what your donation goes toward. That means The Planetary Society is completely free to collect your money and use it for anything, not you intended purpose.

      Don't want to put a downer on a really great project but it would be nice if they let is specify *this* particular project, and not whatever they end up choosing later down the line...


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by ninti · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have been involved with the Planetary Society before and they are a group of good people. If you put a note saying this is specifically what you want your money spent on, I'm sure they would honor it.

    3. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no doubt that they are a fine upstanding group with honorable intentions.

      Legally speaking though, if there isn't a designation the money can be used for just about anything. I used to work for a company that did non-profit fundraising software development. It's a pretty basic requirement to allow fund designation, that's all.


      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    4. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The "???" part is already known.

      1. Deviate spacecrafts from their precisely-planned flightpaths
      2. Set up space advocacy group and beg for donations to help solve "mystery" introduced in step 1.
      3. Profit!

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    5. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by Linus+Torvaalds · · Score: 4, Funny

      UFO - 500 zarbos

      Tractor beam - 100 zarbos

      Antimatter fuel - 30 zarbos

      Confusing the puny humans for decades - priceless

    6. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by M1FCJ · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK, I just sent ten quid by paypal, if my alien doesn't arrive at my door in two weeks I'll see them in court! I hope they are better traders than most ebayers...

    7. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by GodGell · · Score: 1

      antimatter fuel - 30 zarbos

      wtf?
      assuming you mean a tankful of antimatter fuel (say, 56kg):
      today 10 grams of antimatter costs 1.75 trillion dollars, so that means 56kg of antimatter costs 98000 trillion dollars. that means

      1 zarbo = 326 666 666 666 666 666 dollars

      not only is that quite a big currency, but these aliens seem to have some connection with satan afterall.

      so, assuming 1 zarbo = 3.26*10^17 usd, an UFO equipped with a tractor beam (useful feature) costs 195 600 000 000 000 000 000 dollars, aka 1.956*10^20 dollars, aka 600 zarbos.

      we should ask the aliens about the secret of a good economy.
      or the secret of ripping customers off at UFO showrooms.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    8. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a life.

    9. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Where does the obligatory alien anal probe fit into all this?

    10. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Er, today with HUMAN tech, resources, and knowledge, 10 grams of antimatter costs 1.75 trillion dollars.

      For all we know, suspect alien overlords could produce antimatter in a fart...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    11. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Uranus, of course.

    12. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by GodGell · · Score: 1

      yeah, maybe. :) today we use particle accelerators, dunno the percentage but i think it's like 40 antimatter molecules are formed in most tests. so 10 grams per year for $1.75 trillin isn't so bad afterall. :D but producing antimatter is not the only big problem, storage is pretty problematic too. you can't just put it in a tank, you'd effectively create an antimatter bomb. (56kg antimatter + 56kg "normal" matter (112kg), 100% combustion)

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    13. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      antimatter fuel - 30 zarbos

      wtf?
      assuming you mean a tankful of antimatter fuel (say, 56kg):
      today 10 grams of antimatter costs 1.75 trillion dollars, so that means 56kg of antimatter costs 98000 trillion dollars. that means

      1 zarbo = 326 666 666 666 666 666 dollars
      Your calculations are off because you are using early 21st century Earth technology as your basis of calculations.
      Aliens are able to extract antimatter from large deposits found naturally occuring in various parts of the galaxy, controlled largely by OAEW (the Organization of Antimatter-Exporting Worlds).
      Now, the price of antimatter can fluctuate.
      For example, the price rose rapidly in the 1970s during the Aldebrian Antimatter Embargo.
      However, the price of antimatter is still far less out in the galaxy than here on Earth.

      Disputes over antimatter have resulted in some galactic conflicts.
      For example, only recently, the United Federation of Planets invaded Tarsus IV, ostensibly to depose the brutal dictator "Kodos the Executioner", whom, it was claimed, had supported a terrorist attack on the UFP Trade Center, and who was supposedly harboring Weapons of Galactic Destruction.
      Both of these assertions were later proved false, and many are saying that the invasion was really to secure Tarsus IV's antimatter fields.
      (UFP officials state that even though no WGDs were found, the people of Tarsus IV are still better off now than they were before, because they are free of Kodos (who was found hiding in a traveling Shakespearean theatre company, and who is currently awaiting trial on charges of murder and over-acting).
      Still, some Tarsus IVians resent the UFP's presence on their world, and have been attacking the occupying troups.)

      Some environmentalists are claiming that the supply of antimatter in the galaxy is dwindling at an alarming rate, and that in thirty years or so, the galaxy will run out of easily-mined antimatter.
      However, they have been making claims like this for decades, and new technologies are arising that can mine sparse antimatter fields that may have been too expensive to mine using earlier methods.
      Still, much research is going on into alternate forms of energy, especially renewable forms of energy like Stellar power.

      Scientists are also researching an energy source called Zero-Point Energy, but they have yet to exceed the "break-even" point (where more power is produced by the reaction than goes in to initiating the reaction) that would result in portable "Zero-Point Modules" (ZPMs).
      (There is a circulating rumour that a race called "The Ancients" was had access to such technology, but this is denied by UFP officials.)
      If scientists can make this breakthrough, the galaxy will have an essentially infinite supply of energy, and OAEW's stranglehold will be broken.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    14. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by GodGell · · Score: 1

      Aliens are able to extract antimatter from large deposits found naturally occuring in various parts of the galaxy

      in thirty years or so, the galaxy will run out of easily-mined antimatter

      new technologies are arising that can mine sparse antimatter fields that may have been too expensive to mine using earlier methods

      WTF?

      first, there are no antimatter deposits. at least not in this galaxy - if there were, they'd already been destroyed by matter-antimatter reaction. second, even if there were antimatter deposits, how the fuck would anyone mine them? wtf?:D the only way would be if the mining machinery would be made of antimatter (and of course everything in the vicinity), and so would be its operators. but if the aliens are made of antimatter (which isn't really likely in a galaxy where the matter to antimatter percentage is more than 99.99%), then why'd they want to mine antimatter deposits, which, by the way, don't exist?
      think about that a bit, i doubt there's a logical answer. :)
      other than that, you're right, life's been rough outside planet Geo (which we call Earth) since the 80-year war.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    15. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious answer:

      1. Locate a Galaxy made of Antimatter.

      2. Make a deal with the inhabitants of such Galaxy.

      3. Agree to purchase thier waste and have them ship it to an empty space between the Galaxies.

      4. Never tell them your home planet or shake hands with them.

    16. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      today 10 grams of antimatter costs 1.75 trillion dollars

      damn... how much for just a bump? Just a little taste, you know, to get the blood going...

  2. I solved my mystery by Psionicist · · Score: 4, Funny

    The damn thing only supported DVD-R discs, not DVD+R, that's why it didn't work.

  3. I can help by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an 8-track deck in my Charger...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:I can help by PakProtector · · Score: 4, Funny

      An 8-track? With genuine mono sound!?

      Does your Charger also have a device for slowing and speeding up the passage of time?

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    2. Re:I can help by pizen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's under the seat.

    3. Re:I can help by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      "Does your Charger also have a device for slowing and speeding up the passage of time?"

      If his doesn't, I know a guy with a DeLorean that does.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    4. Re:I can help by sharkey · · Score: 1
      Does your Charger also have a device for slowing and speeding up the passage of time?

      Screw that, ask the important question: "Does the horn play the first few notes of Dixie?"

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:I can help by dodongo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Screw time travel; we'll still miss one track from the 9-track tapes.

      Maybe we can use the leftover track from reading the 7-track tapes to our advantage...

    6. Re:I can help by blugu64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      you made a a time machine...out of a DeLorean???

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    7. Re:I can help by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Does your Charger also have a device for slowing and speeding up the passage of time?

      Yes, 8-track players had terrible problems with wow and flutter.

    8. Re:I can help by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      It did, until it was dropped and now you can definitely tell that my Dixie wrecked.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    9. Re:I can help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Does your Charger also have a device for slowing and speeding up the passage of time?" No, but I do...

    10. Re:I can help by xQx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the stainless steel is a requirement for the Tesla flux free-energy theory to work.

      I'm not a nutball, see, those rotating discs that you think only measure the amount of power you use which are in every house actually CREATE the power you use. I'm telling you this rather than making a PACKET of money out of it because I'm a scientest, and the government is trying to shut me up. ... Look, I've got a shiny object with russian writing on it which PROVES the war wouldn't have been won by us if they had just read and understood Tesla's writings.

      It's not offtopic, I sware, because the reason why NASA won't analize the data on those tapes and are so keen to throw out the only computer that will read them is because they KNOW it will prove my point, and that will put the oil companies out of business.

    11. Re:I can help by javamann · · Score: 1

      He got to write off the Delorean he bought. Pretty smart move.

  4. Have you heard of Nero? by yotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not making a joke. Can't they just rip the tapes to a hard drive? This isn't Star Wars where you can't copy the "data tapes" after all.

    1. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by scsirob · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's hardly any hardware available to read these tapes anymore. Proprietary format, ancient tape drives and undocumented data formats make this a huge problem.

      --
      To Terminate, or not to Terminate, that's the question - SCSIROB
    2. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Surely considering the priceless data on these tapes, I'm sure they could hire engineers to rebuild the original tape readers, perhap with modern heads to account for magnetic fading.

      Frankly, I've worked for companies that paid a great deal of money to save their software assets that were stored on old, seemingly unreadable media (a shitload of Digital Research files, the recovery cost us $50k), and that data wasn't even close to the value of the Pioneer probe data. If that's what stops NASA from salvaging that data, somebody needs to be fired there...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      It should be possible to just load the tapes on by one, run them through the master program which was designed for it, and use some IO port, probably serial, to capture the (extremely slow) bitstream.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    4. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0

      Surely considering the priceless data on these tapes, I'm sure they could hire engineers to rebuild the original tape readers, perhap with modern heads to account for magnetic fading.

      They have the technology. They can rebuild him!^H^H^H it!

      All they need is $1,000,000... I mean... $250,000!

      (Do I get bonus points for geeky references? ;-))

    5. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by bazio · · Score: 3, Informative

      The largest part of the cost does not come from recovering the data (although that will be costly), it is from the cost to actually analyze the data and perform any necessary calculations. Despite the current economic conditions, PhD's don't work cheap, at least, not the ones with the required skill sets for this analysis. Additionally, the storage cost is going to be a bit in and of itself. I am not sure of the density and capacity of the tapes NASA used, but 15 years worth of every useful piece of data (observations, navigation, status, etc...) has got to be a lot. Just "ripping it to a hard drive" would require a bit of hard drive space, and would be a bit useless, since they would just be moving it from one aging magnetic media to a slightly newer magnetic media. They are probably hoping to either move the data to some sort of optical storage, or read it directly from the tapes.

      --
      Set the bar high, then bring a tall ladder.
    6. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by gclef · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing to consider: old tape is fragile. I worked with audio tape for years, and tape older than 10 years had to be literally baked (heated & cooled again) before playing. If you didn't bake an old tape the filings from the tape would slough off onto the reading heads...you might (if you were lucky) get one play out of an unbaked tape, but the audio on the tape would definitely be destroyed.

      Given the age of these tapes, getting the data off without destroying it is not as simple as just slapping it onto the machine & hitting "play."

    7. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Ulven · · Score: 1

      But once the data is on a hard drive you now have more than one machine that can read it. And when that machine is about to be scrapped, I'd think that was a considerable advantage.

    8. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      According to some quick googling:
      http://www.columbia.edu/acis/history/media.html

      At 1600 bpi, a 2400-foot 9-track tape could hold about 50MB (depending on blocking, etc). In earlier times there were 4-track and 7-track drives at lower densities such as 200 and 556 bpi.

      According to TFA:
      The Pioneer data exists on a few hundred ancient 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes, which can only be read on "antique" outdated computers

      So, at 50mb a pop, let's estimate really high and say 1000 tapes, you're looking at about 50GB.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    9. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Walrus99 · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... old tape is fragile. I worked with audio tape for years, and tape older than 10 years had to be literally baked (heated & cooled again) before playing.

      My cassette tape of the Rolling Stone's "Sticky Fingers" still plays after 30 years, but then it has been baked and cooled hundreds of times sitting on the dash of my VW bug.

    10. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by sykjoke · · Score: 1

      I used to have a real to real with load of origional 70's and posibly earlier recordings on tape, and I never had a single problem with them. I can see that newer tapes my crumble after a few years as a form of copyright management.

    11. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by pizen · · Score: 1
      All they need is $1,000,000... I mean... $250,000! (Do I get bonus points for geeky references? ;-))
      You almost got the bonus points but unfortunately the answer we were looking for was $6,000,000 not $1,000,000. Sorry. Thanks for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.
    12. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are probably hoping to either move the data to some sort of optical storage,

      If only there were some way that data could be moved from a hard drive to some sort of optical storage...

      or read it directly from the tapes.

      Riiiiight. And then they'll print out some hard copies on greenbar paper for everybody to look at.

    13. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by PakProtector · · Score: 1, Funny

      All they need is $1,000,000... I mean... $250,000!
      (Do I get bonus points for geeky references? ;-))

      You almost got the bonus points but unfortunately the answer we were looking for was $6,000,000 not $1,000,000. Sorry. Thanks for playing and we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

      Since when are the two guys out back waiting to kneecap the contestants considered 'lovely?'

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    14. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1

      Oooo... good point. I was thinking "Million Dollar Man". Forgot about the Six in front. Damn. :-/

    15. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the follow-up research, but... how much to just backup the tapes to DVD?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    16. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by stienman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1. Chances are good that this is a labor intensive process. It's is likely slow, and the number of tapes and age of the equipment means jamming.

      2. Note that the 'society' wants to get 1/4 million not just for the data conversion, but also a fund to study the data.

      Quite frankly I might donate if it were simply to convert the data and make it publicly available. Note that they won't release the data until after it has been analyzed, and give no definite timeframe (months to a year).

      Not that I'm against the project, but I don't know anything about this society, and the press release has very little information other than "Help us get our hands on the data by giving our society money." Do their members get access to the data as it's converted? What exactly is the process and timeline if they reach their goal? What happens to the money if they don't reach their goal?

      -Adam

    17. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by saider · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope it works faster than realtime, or you'll be capturing data for the next 40 years.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    18. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but only a Jedi can copy those files. That's why they're asking for help. They need a quarter million to hire one.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    19. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      check this link out for 9 track tapes on ebay You can also buy used 9 tracks tapes from an ebay store as well. The guy has about 120 of them. As for 7 track drives I don't know. I found this on wikipedia. And what is really interesting if you click on the picture you can see the picture was taken from an old NASA video! Here is another picture I found of 2 different IBM 7 track drives here from this article.

    20. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Skjellifetti · · Score: 4, Funny

      Despite the current economic conditions, PhD's don't work cheap.

      No. but their grad students do.

    21. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The first two words of TFA are "very soon"m, which implies that at this moment in time NASA are able to do it. Why can't they just burn it to $other_media before they scrap the old machine? It's not rocket science.

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
    22. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which would be about 7 double layer DVDs.

    23. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is SOME hardware availiable to read it now. (Even some companies, now that it is getting to be a lost art.)

      For the youngsters out there, who have never dealt with the tapes, A standard 2400 foot nine track tape holds about 45 megabytes. (Yes, that's MEGAbytes... Much less than a floppy now adays. So we are talking more than 10 tapes per CD if you rip them to a CD.)

      *HOWEVER* note that the issue of file formats was much more complex in those days. Many more choices. (I was once hired to write programs to copy text file to/from Univac COPYG tape format..., nine bit bytes, control word and length followed by the line for each line, etc...)

    24. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by khedron+the+jester · · Score: 0

      Or 20000 now, 170000 later.

    25. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Why are undocumented data formats a problem? I mean, sure, you've got to read the data eventually, but that can be considered separately from the (much more urgent) problem of getting the data off the magnetic tapes before they break.

      I say instead of asking for $250K to retrieve the data and analyse it, they should just ask for a smaller amount to merely preserve the data so that the possibility remains to read it later. All they need to do urgently is get the bits.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Can't they just rip the tapes to a hard drive?

      The article I read was talking about a Doppler effect, which sounds to me like a quality of the signal that is independent of the digital data that the signal was carrying. I wish the article had been more clear about this.

      If my interpretation is correct, what is needed is a way to accurately preserve 15 years of continuous tone (presumably so that subtle Doppler shifts in carrier wave frequencies can be analyzed).

      Would someone who knows more about this speak up? I only had time to read one of the many fine articles...

    27. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One thing to consider: old tape is fragile. I worked with audio tape for years, and tape older than 10 years had to be literally baked (heated & cooled again) before playing. If you didn't bake an old tape the filings from the tape would slough off onto the reading heads...you might (if you were lucky) get one play out of an unbaked tape, but the audio on the tape would definitely be destroyed.

      Given the age of these tapes, getting the data off without destroying it is not as simple as just slapping it onto the machine & hitting "play."


      I call bullshit! I recovered audio tape that was 36 years old. The tape player had 35 year old rotted batteries. I cleaned the terminals, put new batteries in. "Mickey Mouse" wired the audio output to a jack that plugs into my computer and ripped it onto MP3. And yes the tape still plays fine over and over...although the sound wavers now and then but that might be how it sounded in 1968 brand new. FYI this was not a standard tape cassete either. Proprietary mini tape...must've cost a fortune back then.

    28. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is probably less to do with the need for a 9 track
      and more to do with the physical quality of the tape. They
      tend to basically turn to dust because they are so brittle and
      require special handling if they can be used at all

    29. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >real to real

      thats one of the more interesting spelling fuck-ups I've scene hear

    30. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by slashrogue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it has more to do with the fact that the people at NASA probably believe that it is some pedestrian reason and the likelihood of it being some crazy new physics is just not worth putting the money into researching it.

    31. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      The largest part of the cost does not come from recovering the data (although that will be costly), it is from the cost to actually analyze the data and perform any necessary calculations.

      PioneerAnomaly@Home?

    32. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can remember this morning?

    33. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      If that's what stops NASA from salvaging that data, somebody needs to be fired there...

      Somebody DOES need to be fired but not at NASA. Unfortunately, the elections are over a year away.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    34. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 1
      There's hardly any hardware available to read these tapes anymore. Proprietary format, ancient tape drives and undocumented data formats make this a huge problem.

      I find this a little hard to believe. True, most mainframe shops are now on cartridge drives, but there have to be 9-track tape drives out there somewhere.

      The 9-track tapes would have been 6250, 1600 or 800 bpi (I think there might have been a 256 older density somewhere along the way). I'm not sure if the 7-track tapes would read on a 9-track drive or not. I used to have a 9-track drive (sold it about 10 years ago) connected via SCSI to a Mac SE/30. The company that sold it also had PC drivers. Reading/Writing on a Mac was real easy. My best recollection is that a 2400-ft 9-track tape at 6250 bpi would hold about 150 MB of data.

      A more serious issue is how these tapes have been treated over the years. Proper treatment for 9-track tapes is to wind/rewind them every so many years (otherwise you get magnetic cross-print between adjacent turns of tape. I wonder if these tapes have been correctly treated over the years.

      Lastly... there are plenty of people still around (waves hand madly!) who have actual experience with tape formats (IRG, IBG, labels, filemarks, etc) who would be very happy to donate spare time writing code to de-block the data and move it off to HDs.

      --
      This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss
    35. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No fundamental laws of physics aren't going to change in the next decade or two. So we loose a little bit of data from a 30 year old spacebucket. We can build another one to monitor this anomoly. No hurry.

    36. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      They mentioned only 15 years. The baudrate of the pioneers is not high (I do not know how slow, but really slow for today standards, and also for an odd 30 year old system what we are talking about here), so 2 times realtime.

      He, the system ran for about 30 years, what is another 8?

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    37. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Alexcount · · Score: 1

      Whale oil was the lubricant used in most tape before the 80's. in the 80's when they switched, they did'nt know it would come appart so fast. this tape is from the 70's and being whale oil, probably won't need baking.
      i can remember back in 82 buying last years stock to save money, all tape i bought after that had to be baked, but the old stuff is fine.

    38. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That would be a great idea if they have some set tools to analyze the data and the data processing is good for processing in parallel.

      Plus, if they can make the raw data available, there will be plenty of crazed computational methods maniacs (like me :-)) who will be more than happy to have a go at it with their own ideas of what might cause the anamoly.

    39. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's hardly any hardware available to read these tapes anymore...

      Took me all of 30 seconds to turn up some 9-track SCSI drives on eBay...

    40. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Proprietary format, ancient tape drives and undocumented data formats make this a huge problem.

      Maybe now somebody will understand why I insist that we use pen and paper to archive our data in a human legible form?

      --
      What?
    41. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You didn't happen to work for Sonic Solutions in the late 1980s, did you?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    42. Re:Have you heard of Nero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seen

  5. Archive in different format by FL180 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about just take the data and archive it in a different format? Then it's not tied to a specific piece of hardware.

    1. Re:Archive in different format by nonuttin · · Score: 1

      I agree, it makes much more sense to have a short term goal to convert this data to a more modern format. That would give them the time to gather necessary funds and work on the data analysis.

    2. Re:Archive in different format by dascandy · · Score: 1

      How are you possibly going to archive anything specific on a specific kind of nonspecific hardware? Doesn't it kind of imply, that at the moment you archive it, you archive it with the device only to unarchive it later with a similar or compatible device?

      You cannot untie any storage method from it's associated storage equipment. You can however move it to a more current kind of device, say, a RAID.

    3. Re:Archive in different format by mikeswi · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's just what they're planning to do. The problem is that the current format can only be understood by a particular type of obsolete computer that NASA is about to scrap.

      I had a letter somewhere that explained the problem in detail but I must have tossed it (I'm a member of the society, so I get the occasional mailing). They're planning to port the data to a modern format so it can be examined properly.

    4. Re:Archive in different format by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I utterly fail to understand is why NASA thinks they can get away with scrapping the only computer on the planet that can read the tapes, without spending a few days to read the tapes off first????? What kind of <oxymoron>brilliant NASA administrator<oxymoron> thought that was even remotely a good idea?

      AFAICT, They are fully aware of the fact that they have data that defines priceless, and they're just going to toss it in the trash along with the computer because they got tired of trying to figure it out.

      Now that's a FAQ for you, Planetary Society...

      --
      GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    5. Re:Archive in different format by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because thee are probably hundreds of tapes of data that would take weeks to read and transfer. You have to pay someone to do this, as well as pay someone to maintain the machine in the interm. Neither of which is cheap. Particularly for a mission whose funding has long since turned to dust.

      At my lab in grad school we had some Voyager tapes that were only readable by one type of (obsolete) machine. We always wanted to get rid of the machine because it was taking up a ton of space and was a bitch to keep working. But getting the people reasonsible to copy the data to a new format was an uphill battle because there was no money to pay someone (even a student) to do it.

      I'm not saying that this is the way things should be or that priorities have been well-set, here. But the economic reality is that it's not as simple as you think.

    6. Re:Archive in different format by Omega+Hacker · · Score: 1

      Wow, how intellegent. I forget one character in a fake tag and I'm now a Grade A "dumbass".

      What, are you sore because they didn't pick you as the new pope? Apparently you're so perfect they should have.

      --
      GStreamer - The only way to stream!
    7. Re:Archive in different format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      20+ years worth of daily data on deteriorating tapes recorded with obsolete no-spare-parts-available equipment doesn't amount to "a few days" worth of tape dumps. It could take one person years.

      I think NASA should scrap the whole stupid, pointless Shuttle thing and use the money for more projects like this one, but they didn't ask me.

    8. Re:Archive in different format by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The problem is that the current format can only be understood by a particular type of obsolete computer that NASA is about to scrap.
      The operative word here is "about".
      The computer hasn't been scrapped yet, and they should take advantage of that.

      Why can't they use the obsolete equipment to read all of the tapes and transfer the raw data to a more modern medium?
      My totally uninformed guess is that a couple of hundred tapes should fit on a couple of DVDs, which can then be replicated as many times as needed.
      The hardware needed to communicate the info between the obsolete computer and an ordinary PC (say, over an RS-232 line or Centronics-style parallel port) should be relatively trivial to build.
      I don't see why the entire operation should cost a quarter of a million dollars.
      However, if they want to pay me that much, I'll do it.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    9. Re:Archive in different format by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      It was rather ironic that in the middle of ripping into NASA for perceived lack of competence, you screw up elementary XML syntax...

    10. Re:Archive in different format by ninjagin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Aye. Your instincts are good. The job is do-able.

      An old friend of mine came into an old arcade game (defender) and the battery that kept the mainboard toasty (and the score history) had leaked acid all over it, nearly destroying it. He picked off what salvageable components were left on the board, scrounged around a number of dusty electronics stores to replace what could not be salvaged, bought a ROM programmer, made a new mainboard, slapped everything back together and the old game was restored. A few of the old pieces salvaged could not be made to work dependably and had to be replaced again, but over time the machine was back up and running.

      The hard part is probably the media. I worked in radio for awhile and we were often faced with duplicating tapes after they'd exceeded a 5-7 year shelf life. I'm surprised that there was no plan for duping the data periodically to formats/platforms that could be sustained.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
    11. Re:Archive in different format by Knara · · Score: 1

      Why didn't the people who were concerned about the data just volunteer their time to do the maual labor required to recover it?

    12. Re:Archive in different format by Jboy_24 · · Score: 1

      Another post stated that the data was already pulled from the 9 track tapes on to 128mb MO disks, writen to by a SCSI MO drive.

      I used to work for a computer liquadator, we had around 4-5 of them lying around waiting for the dumpster. It shouldn't be too hard to transfer that data to cdrom's.

    13. Re:Archive in different format by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      We're talking about dozens, if not hundreds, of reels of tapes. And people who do have jobs that they have to do. So asking them to volunteer their free time to archive the data is a bit much to ask. (Especially when you consider that the typical scientist works well over 40 hours a week to begin with.)

      It isn't that the people didn't want the tapes converted. It's that they just couldn't make it happen with the budgets and time that they had.

    14. Re:Archive in different format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny ha ha,
      more likely they're sitting in endless meetings paraded upon one another day after day discussing about how and when these tapes are to be run and whose budget it is gonna blow at and which papers need to be filled out to apply for funding and how many problems there are considering this pile of tapes... instead of just doing the goddamn tape runs. It is called the ADMINISTRATIVE INEFFICIENCY SYNDROME and effects anyone who's worked in an organisation, preferrably governmental or academic, that handles such data for the public good on a tax budget.
      -- Tapemonkey Jr , 6700 9-track tapes down the road.

    15. Re:Archive in different format by Knara · · Score: 1

      I dunno, seems like the "little bit at a time on a consistent basis" would have done it. But, guess it's a moot point now.

    16. Re:Archive in different format by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Maybe. But when you perpetually have a half a dozen or more other things that are rush priorities, it's really easy to let it slip.

      I mean, how often do you clean behind the couch? (He asks, rhetorically.)

    17. Re:Archive in different format by FL180 · · Score: 0

      You know what I meant. Ok, so I should have written "then it's not tied to THAT specific piece of hardware."

      Don't you have better things to do than be so fricking literal? Guess not.

    18. Re:Archive in different format by fm6 · · Score: 1
      What I utterly fail to understand is why NASA thinks they can get away with scrapping the only computer on the planet that can read the tapes, without spending a few days to read the tapes off first?????
      Have you ever worked in an organization bigger than a baseball team? Obviously not, or you'd know that people make such mistakes all the time. Some administrator asks, "Why are we spending all that money housing and maintaining obsolete tape drives? Are we using them?" Whoever answered "No" obviously didn't do their homework well enough, but they didn't screw up as badly as you suggest. Dead media turns up all the time.
  6. Huh? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This additional and thus far unexamined data

    Let me be the first to say WTF?!!

    This is inexcusable.
    It's insane to throw this project out the window..
    I hope people will step up to the plate on this. I for one will..

    1. Re:Huh? by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I too will be donating to this project. But I really do have to ask... why has this not been done already? My first WTF moment of the week, and it's only 10:00 AM on Monday.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    2. Re:Huh? by dlefavor · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      After years of analysis, but without a final conclusion, NASA, astonishingly, gave up trying to solve the "Pioneer Anomaly" and provided no funds to analyze the data. The Pioneer data exists on a few hundred ancient 7- and 9-track magnetic tapes, which can only be read on "antique" outdated computers. The agency is going to scrap, literally demolish, the only computers able to access and process that data in the next few months!

      Looks to me like they're scrapping the 'puters, not the tapes. I doubt they're the last ones on earth capable of reading old tapes. It isn't the computers anyway, it's the tape drives and software that connects them that are the critical items.

      Further, it looks like they are asking for money to do analysis (read: salaries of humans), not necessarily save the data.

      Still and all, we need to save the data. I wonder what other really cool stuff is stored on media that nobody can read?

  7. How much do you want to bet... by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That those several hundred tapes will fit on a $10 USB key? That's what 128 or 256MB these days?

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:How much do you want to bet... by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, they most likely will fit. Now please invent a time machine and yourself back to the 1960's so you can have them install a USB port, preferably USB 2.0, on the computers for the Pioneer project. See, all the problems are solved!

    2. Re:How much do you want to bet... by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually it shoulnd't be that hard... as an embedded software engineer, i would say run the signal from the tape head to a DAC (if analog) and just write out the data the same way a wav file is written. When you "write out" the data, you only need to signal the USB serial protocol which would wrap the (analog?) data. The actual mediaum for USB data is a differential pair of wires. Some micro geek with tape reading experience could probably build a tape -to-usb reader for a few bucks. You wouldn't even need a USB tranceiver, though it probably would make it much, much easier.

      All in all, remmeber you only have to take some data and wrap it in a protocol that is expressed on a differential pair. Not that hard...

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    3. Re:How much do you want to bet... by dlefavor · · Score: 2, Informative
      Actually, I'd bet quite a bit.

      A 2400 foot reel of 6250 bpi 9-track tape contains about 160 MB, given large block size. If they're the 3490 type tapes, each cartridge can hold as much as 1600MB. Block size is important because there's an inter-block gap on the tapes that is essentially wasted space, and the more blocks, the more waste.

    4. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Too complicated. Have the existing computer write the data out a regular serial port to a PC, which writes it to the hard disk. You can do what you want with it after that.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:How much do you want to bet... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is possible that some tech team at NASA back in the late 80's proposed a project to convert the data from the old format to the newer (and on it's way to becoming prevalent) IBM or MAC PC format?

      I just don't get it, here we have an agency full of engineers, and no one could think, "hey wouldn't it be cool to look at the data on a PC/Mac, a UNIX machine, or an IBM Mainframe?".

      It's a shame, becuase more than likely most of the engineers involved with the original pioneer project would have been alive and able to otherwise contribute to such a conversion.

      Now that so much time has passed, these things are much harder.

      The high level tasks for the project would be:
      1. Engineer a hardware solution that suports the comm(item 2) and data conversion(item 3). This is the really hard part. Maybe bypass the pioneer era computer and just design an interface from the tape reader to a serial port on a PC?

      2. Some type of comm protocol recognizable by both sets of hardware. The burden of this is most likely going to have to be carried by the newer hardware. Not sure about the source platform and how programmable it is these days, but maybe we can teach a PC or UNIX box to speak 'old tape'. THe more I think about this, the more it sounds like we'd need to write 'drivers' for the old tape drives.

      3. Devise a proper data mapping/converison scheme from pioneer to ascii (or ebcidic) based storage.
      Involves probably writing conversion software on the receiving machine. (I'd love to take a crack at this myself to be honest.)

      so we need:
      1. conversion hardware
      2. communications software (or driver for the old tape drives)
      3. conversion software

      Any analysis would take place using the output of 3.

      Like I said above, I can't believe that no one at NASA has thought about this. SOmeone, somewhere must have had at least preliminary plans for something like this.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    6. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      regular serial port

      I think you misspelled "current-loop TTY interface".

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    7. Re:How much do you want to bet... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter how much to be on this, as long as all proceeds go towards this project ;)

    8. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone could build a tape-to-USB interface for a few bucks. But it would have nothing to do with differential pairs. The USB protocol is much more complex than you apparently believe; if the device isn't recognized and initialized, the bus doesn't even know it exists. I've actually developed USB devices, and if you mess up even a tiny detail, it doesn't work. A hundred times more complex than RS232, if you plan to start from differential pairs and work up to the USB protocol.

      The only way this could be easily done is with a USB microcontroller with a built-in low level interface, plus some serious quality time developing firmware. There may also be some prebuilt analog-to-USB chips, though at that point one wonders if it might be more efficient to use a sound card input.

    9. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      BZZZT.. wrong

      For one thing, there's three different modulations for 9 track. You'll need algorithms to decode them all. Secondly, the alignment on the tape heads is never 100% accurate. The mechanics of the recording tape drives often play a direct roll in the quality of the recording. (Suction drives, direct drives, portables, etc...)

      In other words, I've seen it done. It worked fine for normal media, but older media failed much worse than on the old suction drives. The algorithms usued to analyze the recording often reject large parts of the data, whereas the analog drive electronics were far better at slugging through the bad chunks.

      You usually only get one chance with these tapes. Unless they're all 3M Black Watch or the very early iron ferrite tapes, you're looking at a moderate to rough recovery. The media binding can scrape right off. A couple of days of baking can help but again, you usually only get one chance.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    10. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may also be some prebuilt analog-to-USB chips, though at that point one wonders if it might be more efficient to use a sound card input.

      After the 7-9 tracks of data get converted to a raw audio format (possibly multitrack, depending on the way the data was stored on the tapes) and they get cleaned up a bit, it's a matter of writing a program that can understand the proprietary data format on the tapes and correctly output it to a modern format that makes sense to NASA.

      Then again, some of the aging hardware on the Pioneer may have fluxuated the signal in such a way that would make it very hard to translate to a more rigid digital format (not to mention the distance that it was sending the signal to be recorded in the first place). The data might not be (and probably is NOT) completely uniform throughout all of the tapes over the years, so it may be much trickier than simply recording the signals to raw audio and demodulating them.

    11. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Ztream · · Score: 1

      [...]as an embedded software engineer[...]
      That's so cool! Now I never have to program my household appliances any more, I can just buy one with an embedded software engineer and tell him what to do.
      One thing though, do I have to feed you?

    12. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...]as an embedded software engineer[...]

      Oh great, a software guy who thinks he knows something about hardware...If I had a nickle for every software guy that thought he knew hardware...

      Yes you can do it, no it's not that simple. You should learn a little about USB too.

    13. Re:How much do you want to bet... by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      You were that kid who plugged a cassette deck into the io port on his TI-85 to archive Z-shell, aren't you?

      But seriously, you could recover the analogue signal, but without knowing the specifics about any of this stuff (I'm more of an AIT person), I can see some potential problems:

      • You have to get a head that matches the format. Playback head gaps have to be very precisely defined, given the tape's speed when reproducing and the upper frequency limit of the material recorded. You also have to know the width of the bands on the tape, the spaces inbetween, and then somehow obtain a head to fit the physical medium. I assume that 9-track/7-track was some kind of "standard" in the sense that people in the 70s understood the word (one company sold it for a long time, and didn't fight reverse-engineering).
      • You also need a transport mechanism that can effectively move the tape at the designated speed (which we know, right?), while giving the right performance for wow & flutter, tape tension, weave, warp, etc. On high-frequency material this is very important. (I am assuming in all of this that this tape format uses a stationary head and records longitudinally on the medium, not horizontally or helically.)
      • The playback amp electronics must be able to linearly reproduce from the tape, which means knowing the tape's reference fluxivity. As well, the PB amp must take off any preemphasis that was put on the tape at recording. Analog audio often uses preemphasis, did 9 track use preemphasis?
      • I suspect the signal is modulated onto the tape in some way to keep DC at a minimum, using either eight-to-ten modulation (like DATs), some other magic table-lookup byte-encoding system that was never documented openly, or some bytes + checksums + "extra" bytes to pull each byte of data as close to 0 average volts as possible. It may be biphase-mark encoded, and might use square waves or not. One of the bands might be a control track for synchronization-- the presence of 9 tracks (8+1) suggests this, but do we know?Mysterys abound.
      • If you successfully demod the signal, you then must decode any error-correction that the machine recording it (hopefully) put on the tape. Reed-Solomon codes for burst errors, Huffman codes for compression maybe?
      • If you have succeeded in the preceding, or you just broke down and bought the machine, you now have Uint8 *tapeData[]. Now make that into records.

      I might know what I'm talking about, I might be talking out my ass. This is slashdot, you be the judge 8^)

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    14. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Hugonz · · Score: 1

      Maybe run the tape to a DAC and then use GnuRadio to digitally demodulate the signal according to the protocol used. No more need to have the actual tapes lying around...

      Hugo

    15. Re:How much do you want to bet... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's plenty of standards for 9 track. It was an open format. Everything from the modulation (NRZI, PE, GCR), the block gaps, the tape track widths, reel diameters, etc..

      Here's some of them
      and another here...

      I worked in seismic oil services for a few years, I would assume that NASA used pretty standard stuff as far as physical formats are concerned. The data itself is probably something different.

      It's interesting to compare the ANSI of yesteryear to the IETF today. I get the feeling humanity is fighting the same battles over and over again.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  8. If... by fimbulvetr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If we donate, and they reach the amount, will the data be open to everyone?
    That is absolutely critical, I will not donate unless I can see the data.

    1. Re:If... by Walkiry · · Score: 0, Redundant

      RTFA:

      Will the data be made publicly available?
      Yes. First, the data first must be recovered, validated, documented, and preliminary analyses must be done. After those tasks are completed (probably taking months to a year), the data will be made publicly available, including second-order data products when the raw data is processed by JPL orbit software.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    2. Re:If... by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      The Planetary Society article states that all data retrieved will be made publicly-available.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    3. Re:If... by dreemernj · · Score: 1

      "If we donate, and they reach the amount, will the data be open to everyone? That is absolutely critical, I will not donate unless I can see the data."

      That is exactly what I was thinking. I don't even have a need for the information, but it is so mysterious and geeky that I must have it!

      --
      1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  9. And miss.... by Blitzenn · · Score: 4, Funny

    What and miss a great opportunity for a wonderful conspiracy theory in the future?

    "They destroyed those things so we wouldn't know what it REALLY found. I know they did! Why else would they destroy them. It must be a conspiracy!"

    1. Re:And miss.... by igny · · Score: 1, Funny

      where the observed trajectory of these spacecraft (and a couple others) deviates noticeably from our very precise expectation. Apparently, Hollywood didn't have very good computers before 1988.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
  10. Free money? by ActionJesus · · Score: 4, Funny
    You do not need to be a member to donate.

    Just as well, i was away to send a million pounds but thought "oh no! im not a member! theyll never accept my non-space-geek cash!"

  11. Funding by fejikso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    $250,000 sounds like very little money compared to other NASA projects. Why can't my tax dollars go to these projects instead of the military?

    1. Re:Funding by Chicane-UK · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because the majority of your voting public re-elected a war president.

      The rest of the world (and the 49 percent of people who DIDNT want him back in) did try to tell them it was a bad idea, but obviously enough people didn't listen! :(

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    2. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Because defense spending is a necessary and Constitutionally-justified federal espense. Space exploration is not. Since you really do not want any sort of national defense, we'll make sure to "throw you on the bayonettes" of the enemy next time any army, terrorist or otherwise, attacks us. Maybe your corpse will slow them down, and you can contribute in some way especially when you refused to pay your fair share. You've made your contempt for your own country and its people pretty clear to us.

    3. Re:Funding by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm sorry, that's classified.

    4. Re:Funding by ChillyWillie · · Score: 1

      $250k? I work for the gov't and you've got to be kidding me! What can they possibly accomplish with that little money? You'd be lucky to get 2 man-years out of that.

      Small research projects get more money than that. I honestly don't see how this funding will be sufficient for anything other than posting the data on a webpage.

      --
      I am NOT putting my signature in this stupid little box! How do I know you won't steal my identity???
    5. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the majority of your voting public re-elected a war president.

      Ahem, let's not forget that John Kerry (the candidate who received quite a few of those votes from the 49% that didn't want him back in) supported Bush's descision to go to war in Iraq.

    6. Re:Funding by truckaxle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      W. Churchill once said that "The greatest argument against Democracy is five-minute conversation with the average voter". While funny it has a kernel of truth.

      After the last election I was listening to exit interviews on the radio and some guy said he voted for Bush because he fouled up things so bad in his first term he wanted to make sure he had the chance to straighten things out.

    7. Re:Funding by Alexis+Boulva · · Score: 1, Troll

      s/military/fucking military/g

    8. Re:Funding by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 2, Insightful
      $250,000 sounds like very little money compared to other NASA projects. Why can't my tax dollars go to these projects instead of the military?

      Why can't my tax dollars stay in my pocket so I can decide how to spend them?

      Yes, I know, too many people think they know better than I do how my money needs to be spent... and they keep electing politicians willing to take it away from me to give to someone else.
      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    9. Re:Funding by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, we must have not gotten the memo that said 'mysteries of physics' were unrelated to defense.

      We'll clear all our research labs out by the end of the day. You can ship us all the integrated circuits, lasers, and nuclear weapons you will no longer be using. We'd like them by the end of next month.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:Funding by op12 · · Score: 1

      Why can't my tax dollars go to these projects instead of the military?

      Because hammers are expensive.

    11. Re:Funding by RexRhino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because that is not how taxes work! If they were going to spend the money on something you really wanted or needed, they wouldn't have to forcefully extract the money from you at gunpoint, now would they? You would give it voluntarily (like people are going to do for the Planetary Society and this project).

    12. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why can't my tax dollars stay in my pocket so I can decide how to spend them?


      Because if you are anything like most of the population you wouldn't give any money to anyone, but would still bitch when the roads started to look like shit, and the schools start turning out even more McJob canidates. And yes, you do have to pay for schools even if you don't have kids, the education is not just for the benifit of the person getting it, but also for those around him who will benifit from what he does with it.
    13. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the U.S. spends around $288 million every day in Iraq. So all we have to do is agree to pull out 1.25 seconds earlier on the day we finally leave! It's that easy!

    14. Re:Funding by digidave · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add that he supported Bush's decision based on forged evidence that he was not aware was falsified.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    15. Re:Funding by modecx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $250,000 is such a pathetic amount of money distributed across the 250 million or so people that our country collects tax from that it's just not funny. Is the cost of a thousandth of a cent too much to preserve this historic data to you?

      If you want to be all upset about taxes, that's fine... I don't blame you--nobody likes taxes! However, This is small fish compared to pretty much everything else out there. It's not like politicians regularly use tens of thousand times this amount to go to lavish conventions and other inane stuff, or anything.

      This is important, and actually has the potential to increase our understanding of the universe--unlike much that the government does at greater expense. This is hardly a blip on the radar. Crow sized, even.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    16. Re:Funding by Yanray · · Score: 1

      Well, that's democracy for you.

      Majority wins, minority losses, sucks huh

      --
      --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
      DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
    17. Re:Funding by jafac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because defense spending is a necessary and Constitutionally-justified federal espense. Space exploration is not.

      Think of space exploration as far-sighted defense spending. Otherwise, think of how the world would be today if, in the 1940's and 1950's, the US did no ballistic missile research at all, and let the Soviets take LEO, Geosynchronous Orbit, the Moon, and everything else.

      Every dollar invested into the space program, public education, interstate highways, power grids, even welfare and medicaid, is a dollar well-spent towards shoring up national defense. Just not in as direct a way as you'd like.

      What is money POORLY invested in defense or national security, is $200 Billion to invade a country, destabilize it's govenrment so it can be taken over by Iran. http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/07/21/iran/ index_np.html

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    18. Re:Funding by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      Just tell that to Al Gore...

    19. Re:Funding by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Bah.. We should offer those people the choice: pay for education now or don't collect SS later.

      (seriously.. the baby boomers are the selfishest generation ever: 'There's a lot of us, but we choose to not have kids, but give us money when we're old you selfish kids of other people.')

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    20. Re:Funding by jafac · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, that's classified.

      Just call up Karl Rove and tell him you're a reporter. He'll be happy to share.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    21. Re:Funding by jafac · · Score: 1

      Ahem, let's not forget that John Kerry (the candidate who received quite a few of those votes from the 49% that didn't want him back in) supported Bush's descision to go to war in Iraq.

      I'd argue that around 95% of John Kerry's votes weren't FOR John Kerry, but rather, AGAINST Bush.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    22. Re:Funding by jafac · · Score: 1

      Because the majority of your voting public re-elected a war president.

      You mis-spelled "whore".

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    23. Re:Funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because this is America... we don't think logically.

    24. Re:Funding by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The Government is all-wise and all-just. The Government loves you. The Government allowed you to be created so you could know It and to love It. The Government will always care for you. Thus, the Government knows how best to spend your money.

      The Government is your Friend. The Government would never do anything to harm you. The Government only harms people who are its enemies. The Government does this because the Government loves its enemies, but the Government must correct its enemies.

      As an adopted child of the Government, you must realize that everything the Government does is on your behalf and in your best interest. How could it be differently?

      Questioning the Government is something enemies do. If you insist on questioning the wisdom, motives and truth of the Government, you will be considered an enemy too. Only enemies could doubt the True Justice that is the Government's alone. Questioning the Government leads to independent thought, freedom, creativity and democracy, all of which are evil and will corrupt the morals of our Perfect Society.

      Please report to your nearest Government Re-education Center. If you do not report with 24 hours, a Government Truth Squad will be sent to pick you up... with a sponge. If you cannot locate a Center, please ask any Government Official, or simply follow the screams.

      Thank you.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    25. Re:Funding by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why can't my tax dollars stay in my pocket so I can decide how to spend them?

      Because if society worked this way, human greed would prevail and services such as paved roads, public parks, snow removal, and disaster relief would not exist.

      Greed is good for some things (see capitalism), but a modern society can not succeed on greed alone, no mater what staunch libertarians would have you believe.

      Going all the way to that extreme won't get you any further ahead than going all the way to the other extreme (marxism).

    26. Re:Funding by iabervon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why can't my tax dollars stay in my pocket so I can decide how to spend them?

      Because then you'd have to make individual one-dollar payments to a couple hundred organizations that you're likely to consider worthwhile if you were to look into them, and they'd have to spend a lot of money advertizing their worthiness to you. Having a government you pay taxes to which pays departments is an O(n) process, while having individuals pay them directly is O(n^2). If you think your taxes are complicated now, just think how much it would suck if you had to essentially work out the federal budget yourself each year.

    27. Re:Funding by KilobyteKnight · · Score: 1
      Because then you'd have to make individual one-dollar payments to a couple hundred organizations that you're likely to consider worthwhile if you were to look into them, and they'd have to spend a lot of money advertizing their worthiness to you. Having a government you pay taxes to which pays departments is an O(n) process, while having individuals pay them directly is O(n^2). If you think your taxes are complicated now, just think how much it would suck if you had to essentially work out the federal budget yourself each year.


      There's nothing to figure out. I'd support the things I like and wouldn't support the things I didn't. Everyone else would do the same thing. The things enough people support survive, the rest don't. But no one could complain about having to support something they don't want to support.

      There are certain things necessary to the functioning of a government. A fair tax system is arguably appropriate for those things. Beyond that, it's just plain robbery.

      If you're not willing to rob someone at gunpoint to use their money for the benifit of someone else, you shouldn't be willing to vote for politicians willing to use police power to do it for you.
      --
      When will Windows be ready for the desktop?
    28. Re:Funding by deanoaz · · Score: 1

      >>>I'd argue that around 95% of John Kerry's votes weren't FOR John Kerry, but rather, AGAINST Bush.

      So you're saying that Kerry actually earned less than 2.5% of the votes cast in the 2004 election. I'll go along with that.

      "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte

      --
      If 'the people' in Amendment 2 are 'the state' then Amendments 1, 2, 4, 9, and 10 benefit the state, not you.
    29. Re:Funding by modecx · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's interesting. So, we're going to let people vote directly on the taxes--and thus the policy and services the government provides--that they want to pay for. Sounds pretty good, in thoery--I really think so...But in reality you'd have lots and lots of people not want anything. So, the way I see it, you'd have to devise a minimum number of things to vote for.

      Im thinking the ballot would look like this: 50 checkboxes, and a little note above them reminding you to check at least 50.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    30. Re:Funding by nido · · Score: 1

      I doubt they really spent that much on a hammer. Get congress to budget $X,XXX for an $X or $XX item, and spend the extra money on "off the books" projects. Area 51 and its replacement(s) come to mind...

      Coffee brewer: $7,622 (Air Force)
      Pair of pliers: $748 (Air Force)
      Vinyl armrest pad: $670 (Air Force)
      Toilet seat: $640 (Navy)
      Drill set: $599 (Navy)
      Rechargeable flashlight: $181 (Air Force)
      (from the link)

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    31. Re:Funding by iabervon · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to figure out. I'd support the things I like and wouldn't support the things I didn't.

      So are you going to support the trust to have the street in front of your house repaved when it needs it? How much are you going to contribute to snow removal? Do you want to support giving local kids something better to do than break things in your neighborhood? Which company do you want to pay for trash removal? Are you interested in funding airplane inspections so that planes don't fail and crash into your house? How about medical research, which might save your life at some point if enough people decide to fund it to let it get anywhere?

      Most items on budgets at all levels, from the city to the country, are reasonably likely to be important to you in some way you don't have time to understand. Furthermore, most of them have to be funded at a certain level, or the funding they do get is wasted. The modern world is sufficiently complex that determining what things you want to fund would be more than a full-time job.

    32. Re:Funding by Yanray · · Score: 1

      Bush just got the majority that counted, gotta love that electoral college.

      --
      --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
      DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
    33. Re:Funding by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
      So are you going to support the trust to have the street in front of your house repaved when it needs it? How much are you going to contribute to snow removal? Do you want to support giving local kids something better to do than break things in your neighborhood? Which company do you want to pay for trash removal? Are you interested in funding airplane inspections so that planes don't fail and crash into your house? How about medical research, which might save your life at some point if enough people decide to fund it to let it get anywhere?

      The irony here is, quite a few of those things are already done privately, at least in some cases. The street outside me was built privately (along with the houses it serves), we don't get snow removed (so it's just as well we don't get more than an inch or so at any one time), unless you count school the only program to stop kids breaking things is the threat of jail time, trash removal was privately provided in the last place I lived, aircraft are inspected by the airline for obvious reasons and a lot of medical research is also private, through a combination of hospitals, pharmaceutical companies and charities.

      I'm not advocating removing all those things entirely from the government's remit - I tend to think it should be at least partly responsible for providing the common infrastructure (roads, utilities). I just wish they'd get out of completely illegitimate activities: funding rather questionable art (one state government recently gave $5,000 to an "artist" who hung 12 dildos on hooks and called it "art"!), speeches by Islamic fundamentalists (as happened in London recently)... Cut that out, I think a lot of people would feel a lot more favorable towards the overall budget - and those who actually want to hand four figure sums to "artists" like that would be free to do so.

      Most items on budgets at all levels, from the city to the country, are reasonably likely to be important to you in some way you don't have time to understand. Furthermore, most of them have to be funded at a certain level, or the funding they do get is wasted. The modern world is sufficiently complex that determining what things you want to fund would be more than a full-time job.

      I'm not at all convinced by that argument, though. Much the same was tried by AT&T: having to choose a phone company and long distance service would be far too complex, so they should just have kept on gouging as a monopoly. Didn't quite turn out that way...

  12. Why the deviance? by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Do all of these spacefaring craft differ from their expected trajectories by the same factor? If so, it seems that that would mean there is some as-yet unknown, pervasive force that exerts itself more-or-less evenly in the area that these craft have traveled.

    If the difference of their expected trajectories have no commonality, it would seem to mean either some new force is affecting the craft differently, or each craft has its own mechanical explanation as to why they aren't staying the course.

    Do *none* of these craft follow the expected trajectory? If not, then we really can't be sure whether this is a collection of mechanical issues or various effects of the unknown force. If one or two craft followed course perfectly, I would be inclined to say that the rest have mechanical issues knocking them off course.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Why the deviance? by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      Right. Briefly:
      Is there a Voyager anomaly?
      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:Why the deviance? by tgrimley · · Score: 5, Informative

      from the wikipedia link:

      "When all known forces acting on the spacecraft are taken into consideration, a very small but unexplained force remains. It causes a constant sunwards acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10^-10 m/s2 for both spacecraft.

      ...

      "Data from the Galileo and Ulysses spacecraft are also indicative of a similar effect, although for various reasons (such as their relative proximity to the Sun) firm conclusions cannot be drawn from these sources."

    3. Re:Why the deviance? by Joe+Decker · · Score: 1

      From reading the various articles, Voyager's "three-axis stabilization system" apparently introduces "noise" in the spacecraft trajectory which overwhelm the very tiny effect seen in Pioneer.

    4. Re:Why the deviance? by mollymoo · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is there a Voyager anomaly?

      Perhaps. We don't know because Voyager, like most other spacecraft, is 3-axis stabilised. That means it keeps pointed the right way using only its thrusters. Pioneer is spin stabilised, like a rifle bullet in flight, so requires much smaller pointing corrections using thrusters. The anomaly is a very slight one, so slight that it is lost in the uncertainty caused by the level of thruster activity on 3-axis stabilised craft.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    5. Re:Why the deviance? by mollymoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Spins like a rifle bullet, but a damn slight slower! Of the order of a few rpm.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    6. Re:Why the deviance? by Particle010 · · Score: 1

      Wait... didn't the Voyager anomaly have something to do with a LARGE ENERGY CLOUD?!!

      --
      "Not the Earth!!! That's where I keep all my stuff!!!" - The Tick
    7. Re:Why the deviance? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      In fact, after a lengthy (around 50 pages) analysis, the team that was looking into the anomoly could not find any source for it. But they also concluded the paper by saying that they suspected the anomoly to be something on the spacecraft and not some new physics.

      And while other spacecraft haven't shown this effect (because they have used their thrusters too much), there was a nice paper about a year ago that suggests that the comets we see do *not* show the anomoly, either. So it's not gravitational in nature, most likely,

    8. Re:Why the deviance? by cnettel · · Score: 1

      We never even launched a Voyager 6, you insensitive clod. (Anything but a Trek reference is irrelevant.)

    9. Re:Why the deviance? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      'Deviance' isn't really the right word here. A better word is 'deviation'. Deviance is typically used to describe human behavior eg. deviation from socially acceptable norms. "Why the deviance?" is something you might ask about a child molester.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    10. Re:Why the deviance? by mrshoe · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it's the meters-to-feet conversion "anomaly" that NASA just can't seem to get right.

      --
      There are two types of people in this world: those that categorize other people and those that don't.
    11. Re:Why the deviance? by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      Oh no! The timeline has been corrupted!

    12. Re:Why the deviance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When all known forces acting on the spacecraft are taken into consideration, a very small but unexplained force remains. It causes a constant sunwards acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10^-10 m/s2 for both spacecraft.

      Doh! That was supposed to be metric?!?!?!?

    13. Re:Why the deviance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It causes a constant sunwards acceleration of (8.74 ± 1.33) × 10^-10 m/s2 for both spacecraft.

      It's interesting that this is on the same order of magnitude as the critical acceleration in MOND:

      1.2*10^-10 m/s^2

    14. Re:Why the deviance? by bpiltz · · Score: 1

      Forces acting ON the spacecraft. What about forces generated ONBOARD the spacecraft?

      Nothing as simple as a torque force vector from the spin of the spacecraft??? Or some other spinning component on board the spacecraft???

      Something about a "right hand" rule....

      --
      Goals for 2011: 1. Stop plate tectonics. 2. Prevent animal predation. 3. End supernovae now. 4. Rid the world of evil.
  13. 9 track tapes by wulfhound · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone care to shed any further light on what format these tapes are in, how many there are and in what condition?

    I had a summer job a decade ago ripping 9-track tapes (geophys data) to CD-R (back when CD-Rs were $20 each and a burner was $5k!), pretty sure the people I did it for still have the gear. Planetary guys - I couldn't see a contact address on your page!

    1. Re:9 track tapes by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell from the linked page they've already pulled the data off tape (or are doing it now), and are now just doing the analysis of the data.

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    2. Re:9 track tapes by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you'll do it for half price, right?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:9 track tapes by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      yeah, I did that for Kodak's COLD people, writing software to facilitate reel to reel, 9 track, 8 track, 3270 and other tape formats, some really quite old, to cdr. Their stuff included indexing, conversion and what not, stuff TPS wouldn't need. I'm sure Kodak has a ton of this hardware laying around somewhere too, those old tape drives don't die, and aren't on the list of "top ten things pilfered from your office" so unlikely to have walked off.

    4. Re:9 track tapes by wulfhound · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Ever tried to lift one of those damn things?

  14. Why $250,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that most of the urgency of this could be avoided simply having NASA copy the tapes and the programs that read the tapes to some other system.

    That way the data can be analyzed by the nearest interested astrophysicist / doctoral candidate.

    That doesn't seem like such an expensive process. A couple hundred tapes copied to disk couldn't be that expensive. Setup a script to do it and cut it loose. A weeks worth of moderately attended sysadmin duties at most.

    At that point all you have to do is have NASA put the data on an FTP server.

    So what's the $250,000 for. Damn, send some of this work my way.

  15. Why isn't NASA doing this itself? by bcmm · · Score: 1

    This is clearly very important data which it would be criminal to just throw away. It's taken 30 years and god knows how much money to gather it all. So why doesn't NASA care about it? Is it putting all it's money into manned exploration (shuttle replacement, Mars, etc.)?

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Why isn't NASA doing this itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because they are a bunch of incompetant boobs.

      They need a shake up, maybe some competitive pressure.

    2. Re:Why isn't NASA doing this itself? by sloepoke51 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, I see you haven't been around government projects very long. If the Planetary Society needs $250K, then NASA would need something like $250 million. You know, cost over runs, incompenent / lazy workers, the "it ain't my job" syndrome, etc.

    3. Re:Why isn't NASA doing this itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People don't care about stuff like this, it doesn't make the news, unlike the whole debacle with the launch don't launch launch, well maybe launch thing they have going now. Its almost like they have had this thing planned for a while to get people interested in it again... \conspiracy

  16. Pay up! It's science! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I donated. How about you?

  17. Aliens! by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

    I knew it, they all said I was mad to believe.

    They all said I was mad to live in a small hut in the forest with my tinfoil hat, but i've proven them wrong now!

    All you people with your pitiful belief in "physics", don't you see it's all a conspiracy?!

  18. RTFF by spellraiser · · Score: 5, Informative
    From the FAQ:

    Will the data be made publicly available?
    Yes. First, the data first must be recovered, validated, documented, and preliminary analyses must be done. After those tasks are completed (probably taking months to a year), the data will be made publicly available, including second-order data products when the raw data is processed by JPL orbit software.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
    1. Re:RTFF by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Sweet, thanks, I didn't see the FAQ:)

    2. Re:RTFF by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Thanks for pulling that out. It seems to me, though, that the key part is:
      Why does it cost $250,000 to recover the data? This seems like a lot.

      This amount enables us first to save the data from destruction, and then to support the complex analyses necessary to solve this mystery. We may well have to bring in more help from other eminent "celestial mechanicians" to provide fresh perspectives on the anomaly.

      Before giving them a cent, I'd really like to know a) how much the data retrieval costs and b) whether it really can't be done by EDS or someone else accustomed to dealing with ancient data files. I'm certainly not donating for them to "may well have to bring in more help".
    3. Re:RTFF by badmammajamma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the point in recovering the data if they can't analyze it after they get it? The purpose of the project is to figure out why these space craft are not on the precise trajectories they have calculated -- it's not simply the gathering of old data.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
    4. Re:RTFF by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but the only urgent part of this project is recovering the data.

      In theory for far less you could simply recover the data, test that it was recovered properly, and then stick it on a webpage for anybody in the world to analyze.

      Their proposal is to solve the secrets of the universe for $250k. I might suggest that maybe the goal should be to simply transfer the data for $10k, and let somebody else pay for solving the secrets of the universe. The data recovery project is also far more likely to be successful...

    5. Re:RTFF by Otter · · Score: 1
      If you realize that you're donating some (unknown) amount for data recovery and the (unknown) rest to pay for some (unknown) costs of (unknown) analysis -- then, fine. But the impression I took away from the blurb and the impression most posters seem to have gotten is that they need $250,000 RIGHT NOW!!!! OR THE DATA WILL BE LOST FOREVER!!!! People should at least understand what they're giving to.

      Furthermore, while I don't have direct experience with files like this, I was skeptical even before seeing that FAQ that the data are remotely as unrecoverable as they're making out. On the contrary, I'd bet some dinosaur data processor would do it pro bono. The FAQ doesn't enhance their credibility in my eyes. They should limit their emergency appeal to the recovery and then apply for grants for the analysis.

    6. Re:RTFF by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The thing I care about, and what most of slashdot cares about, is saving the data. We could care less if it's analyzed now or ten years from now. Because we know that some scientist is going to come along and decide to do it when he has a theory about it. (In fact, it makes no sense to talk about 'analyzing' the data without a theory that roughly matches what happened. We already know the facts.)

      However, he can't do that if no one can get to the data because morons at NASA trashed the readers without copying the tapes first.

      We know they have the space. They can probably fit the entire data stream in the same space as ten minutes worth of data from any recent rover project.

      I don't know what the hell is wrong with NASA. This is just idiotic, or possibly the Planetary Society are a bunch of liars.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    7. Re:RTFF by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Only give work to EDS if you want it screwed up and horrendously over budget.

    8. Re:RTFF by Pete · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't have anything particularly intelligent to say other than that I totally agree with you.

      That Planetary Society FAQ does seem like... now what's the right word.... bullshit. So they came up with a suspiciously large and round number ($250K) but, as far as we've seen, no detailed budget behind it? No explanation of what happens to excess funds?

      For fuck's sake, Planetary Society people, it looks disturbingly like a "don't think just donate! QUICKLY!" campaign, built around fear of NASA apparently doing something extraordinarily stupid. There are just too many holes in the story, too much that makes no sense.

      I strongly suspect that they really just want to fund a few qualified people to work on the data full-time for 6-12 months. But if that's so, a little honesty would be appreciated. There's no fucking way I'd donate to support some ridiculous US salary, when I'm sure there are an enormous number of university-based people all around the world that would love to spend time analysing this kind of data and would do it for free.

      And yeah, it is kind of hazy regarding what information of value they hope to extract from this data. The slashdot writeup "...or it may be as groundbreaking as a clue to completely new physics, perhaps related to dark matter or dark energy" sounds like a nutcase trying to sell something.

    9. Re:RTFF by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I agree. The data analysis would probably make for good Ph.D. fodder, and the graduate student(s) working on that already work for peanuts. Even better if the graduate student is getting paid on a traineeship grant that's unrelated to this particular project, because then the work is essentially done for free.

      But the point is moot if the data is never recovered. Focus on that step for now, and if it turns out that there really isn't anybody in a situation to analyze the data without further donations, then come back and ask us for more.

    10. Re:RTFF by bigpat · · Score: 1

      Their proposal is to solve the secrets of the universe for $250k. I might suggest that maybe the goal should be to simply transfer the data for $10k, and let somebody else pay for solving the secrets of the universe. The data recovery project is also far more likely to be successful...

      Chances are you are not going to solve the secrets of the universe hiring one or two consultants. Data recovery and publication is the key. Put it into as many people's hands as possible (internet publication) so that the many hypothesis can be tested against the real data.

    11. Re:RTFF by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Informative
      Rich0 said:
      Yes, but the only urgent part of this project is recovering the data.

      In theory for far less you could simply recover the data, test that it was recovered properly, and then stick it on a webpage for anybody in the world to analyze.

      TFF said:
      Will the data be made publicly available? Yes. First, the data first must be recovered, validated, documented, and preliminary analyses must be done. After those tasks are completed (probably taking months to a year), the data will be made publicly available, including second-order data products when the raw data is processed by JPL orbit software.
      I am a scientist and I have worked on analyzing large data sets such as this before. The tricky part is what you describe as "test that it was recovered properly". This is what TFF described as "preliminary analyses".

      It would be foolish for a programmer to publish a program on the web without first running it a few times to catch bugs. In the same way, a scientist must check her data (even "raw" data) before just blindly putting it up on the web for all to see. If she posts faulty data then she wastes everyone's time, she looks like a fool and pisses a lot of people off. Her reputation may be ruined.

      But how can she know for sure that the data was recovered properly? Checking parity bits is not nearly enough, because she needs to know for sure that she did not make any subtle mistakes and that no one in the chain of generating and producing the data made any subtle mistakes.

      One necessary (but not sufficient) step is to actually analyze the data with your model(s) and see if it makes sense. If it doesn't, then you may need correct your transcription procedure and go back to the original tapes and read them again.

      Transferring the data for $10K and not doing the preliminary analysis would be foolish beyond belief. I think a better cost estimate is roughly $100K for the transfer(s) and preliminary analysis needed to ensure the transfer was done properly. Since everything would already be set up to analyze the data it makes perfect sense to also get another $100K to do the "real" analysis. Since something may well go wrong, ask for another $50K so you can be reasonably sure of getting it done right in the first go round.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
    12. Re:RTFF by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 1

      the planetary society is actually a quite financially transparent organisation which is totally publically run. I agree - there should be more financial details of this upcoming project, but I suspect they put up a big round number because they don't yet KNOW how much it'll cost (if you don't know the actual condition of the tapes you can't know how much it'll cost to access the data on them, if that's even possible). They may have used that number as a rough estimate. in the past they've done stuff like this, later adding on full financial details (once they actually knew).

    13. Re:RTFF by bigpat · · Score: 1

      "And yeah, it is kind of hazy regarding what information of value they hope to extract from this data. The slashdot writeup "...or it may be as groundbreaking as a clue to completely new physics, perhaps related to dark matter or dark energy" sounds like a nutcase trying to sell something."

      That's the old universe for ya, always trying to sell ya those new fangled phyisical laws when the ol' uns a just doin us fine. Oh wait.

    14. Re:RTFF by Pansy · · Score: 1
      "...ridiculous US salary..."

      Considering there's only $250k total, and the average employee incurs 150-200% overhead (so the human resources guy tells me), even if they spent all the money on one person with no equipment costs the most they could pay him would be $100k. Hardly a ridiculous salary if you've ever lived in a big city in the US, much less the bay area (where I am). Likely the actual figure after equipment costs will be much less and split up among several people.

      --
      People are the problem, stop procreation now!
    15. Re:RTFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      250k is a very SMALL amount to pay to have some very smart people work on going over 30 years of data. There is nothing hidden or hazy about what they want the money for. The say they want the money to recover the data and analyse the data. That small amount, combined with the huge task they want ot accomplish means most people working on this project are volunteers.

      If any of you are interested in Space Exploration you should seriously consider joining the Planetary Society. They do a very good job promoting space exploration. They actually run very good low budget experiments, and they effectively lobby the USA government to spend more on space. And as a member you get a very nice quarterly magazine with space science articles written by the people DOING the missions. I've been a member for years.

    16. Re:RTFF by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "whether it really can't be done by EDS or someone else accustomed to dealing with ancient data files"

      'Eds computer barn'? That'd be like having the space shuttle maintained by Joes Garage. At least get someone competent do do it!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    17. Re:RTFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see what's so difficult about getting access to 9-track drives. I've got two in my attic (one HP-IB, one SCSI-2). There's got to be thousands of these kicking around that you can get just for asking. I try to keep at least one tape drive, and networkable computer to host it, for every backup format I have. Maybe I should go into business doing data recovery...

  19. Business proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They have 3 million USD and they are willing to give the extra amount to you as a thank you for your help. Only problem is that the 3 MUSD is stuck in a Nigerian bank and they need some help getting it out. They just need some cash up front to process the transaction. All you need to do is to send them your bank details and some money and soon you will receive 2.75 million dollars for your help :-P

  20. So in short by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Planetary Society is planning on recovering this data and poring over it meticulously to look for something which may have been missed or hidden from current investigations into the phenomenon. They need money to do this, about $250,000, and are asking for donations to fund the project.

    Let me sum up: the USA boldly sends a probe in space, at a very great cost to taxpayers. Some decades later, NASA is forced to scrap the only computer that can access the unique (and very expensive) data collected by said probe, because the administration refuses to fund them properly.

    That's sad enough, but the saddest thing is: a bunch of passionate guys (the planetary society) are begging a measly quarter million bucks to save that priceless data, and the administration just stands there! That's like the cost of running a humvee for a week in Iraq or something. How does that look to the outside world? like a decrepit country where non-profit orgs are forced to take matters into their own hands to save their national treasures. Well done USA :-(

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:So in short by amliebsch · · Score: 1
      like a decrepit country where non-profit orgs are forced to take matters into their own hands to save their national treasures.

      Imagine that! A place where citizens create their own civil society through voluntary association!

      Nah, it'll never work.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:So in short by isa-kuruption · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Let me sum up: the USA boldly sends a probe in space, at a very great cost to taxpayers. Some decades later, NASA is forced to scrap the only computer that can access the unique (and very expensive) data collected by said probe, because the administration refuses to fund them properly.


      Actually, Congress allocates funding for NASA and thus is responsible for the lack of funds. You should contact your local Senate and House representatives if you wish to continue research in this area.

      However, please note that due to beaurocracy alone, the cost of NASA performing this research is on the order of twenty times larger than an exterior organization which uses primarily volunteers and college students and collects money via donations and/or selling T-shirts.
    3. Re:So in short by SharkJumper · · Score: 0, Troll

      a decrepit country where non-profit orgs are forced to take matters into their own hands to save their national treasures.

      I reject your cynicism. How about a country where passionate guys and non-profits are allowed to take matters into their own hands to save their national treaures.

      How does that look to the outside world?

      I think a better question is how does it look to the outside world when all they hear is the noise of whiners like you cutting down your own country?

      Sheesh. What ever happened to patriotism? These guys are scientist patriots as far as I'm concerned. Here's what is truly sad: That the most patriotic feeling that this story could conjure up in you is the urge to bitch. Get off your ass and do something for your country. Contribute. To this project or to your country. Encourage others to do the same. Build up instead of tearing down. That's the lesson to be taken from this.

    4. Re:So in short by Monkelectric · · Score: 0
      Actually, Congress allocates funding for NASA and thus is responsible for the lack of funds. You should contact your local Senate and House representatives if you wish to continue research in this area.

      If the presidents ass-hatery has put us into record deficits ... That forces congress (who i'm no great fan of) into a very bad situation.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    5. Re:So in short by szaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Give it a bloody rest. Patriotism does not preclude disliking what your Country is doing. It doesn't mean 'finding the good in every situation, regarldess of how stupid the situation is'. This has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO DO WITH PATRIOTISM. Do you know how 'AMERICAN PATRIOTISM' comes accross in the wider world. Just give it a rest.

    6. Re:So in short by szaz · · Score: 1

      AND.... It is nothing special to live in a country where Non-profit organisations and volunteers are 'Allowed' to exist. For God's sake man.... most of the World is like that. The US is not the only free Country in the World. It isn't even one of the 'most free'

    7. Re:So in short by isa-kuruption · · Score: 1
      If the presidents ass-hatery has put us into record deficits ... That forces congress (who i'm no great fan of) into a very bad situation.


      Not only does Congress dictate the budget for NASA, but they are responsible for the budget of the entire government. While the President does have opinions on how to spend money, the Congress is not obligated to listen to him. Therefore, once again, if you want to blame "someone" for our deficit, blame the Congress.

    8. Re:So in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Sheesh. What ever happened to patriotism? These guys are scientist patriots as far as I'm concerned. Here's what is truly sad: That the most patriotic feeling that this story could conjure up in you is the urge to bitch. Get off your ass and do something for your country. Contribute. To this project or to your country. Encourage others to do the same. Build up instead of tearing down. That's the lesson to be taken from this.

      Disagreeing with your the government's course of action is unpatriotic? That is just assinine. Sometimes standing on a soapbox and making your point of view heard is contributing. And it also encourages others to do the same. Granted, time would probably be better spent writing a senator or rep, but public dissent can still be a valuable contribution.

    9. Re:So in short by deKernel · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      If the presidents ass-hatery has put us into record deficits ... That forces congress (who i'm no great fan of) into a very bad situation.


      Yes, it was the President that caused the 9/11. Yes it was the President that decided to follow his job description and attempt to protect the U.S. Yes, it was the Presidents fault that there are Muslim extremists out there that are will to not only send children to kill innocent people, but believe that they will be accepted by God.

      You really need to pull your head out of your arse and see the world for what it is and not viewed by your oversimplistic wholly than though approach to the humanity!!!!
    10. Re:So in short by qualico · · Score: 1

      "That's like the cost of running a humvee for a week in Iraq."
      Well said.

      The US trade deficit is supposedly shrinking from its $500 billion, so what's wrong with adding a measly $250k?

      They sure do have some priorities backward.

    11. Re:So in short by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that most of the useful data from the missions have been saved in other formats by now. I can go to the planetary data system and pull up a lot of Pioneer data right now if I wanted to.

      Not every data bit is equally valuable. In this case, the data was probably not originally considered very interesting so wasn't moved at the time. The fact that NASA hasn't copied the data already suggests to me that people near research didn't think that that data would be very helpful in the first place. So while I wish that they'd transfered the data long ago and I applaude the Planetary Society, I am not convinced that this is a horrible failing on NASA's part.

    12. Re:So in short by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You, sir, are an fucking moron.

      He complained, quite rightly, that trashing irreplaceable data for lack of a quarter of a million dollars makes the US government look very very stupid.

      And in addition to appearing that way, it actually is very very stupid. (Do I need to mention what the two unsolved mysteries in physics lead to 100 years ago? Here's a hint: Einstein won a Nobel Peace Prize for solving one of them, but is most famous for solving the other one.) We should have teams of scientists working on figuring out this mysterious force.

      It is not, despite what you may think, 'unpatriotic' to point out when our government is doing stupid things. In fact, pointing out flaws in the current operating procedures of the government is the definition of patriotic in a republic like this one.

      When we see the people running the government are operating it incorrectly, we must point this out to them, and, if they fail to listen, we must replace this, this is our duty as Americans and citizens in a republic.

      Something that is not our duty is to care about what the outside world thinks about our internal politics.

      OTOH, maybe we should pay some attention to what they think about our politics in relation to them and other countries, simply because you can't have political relationships with other nations unless they come, too.

      Oh, wait, you're one of those people who think you owe your loyalty to your party, not your country. So while your party is in power, you translate party=country=government.

      Well, here's a clue. No citizen of the US owes anything to the US government. The US government works for us, we own it. There are places where governments are 'owed' loyaties, but the US is not one of them. Even soldiers do not swear allegience to the government, but to the Constitution, and there's a reason for that.

      And you can owe your party whatever you want, it is, obviously, a free country.

      But, like I said, what you owe your country is the best government you can give it. You can either do that by operating the government, or by chosing people to do so, and complaining when they fail.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:So in short by e2ka · · Score: 1

      ... oversimplistic wholly than though approach...

      Uhh...

      Do you even think about what words mean when you write them?

    14. Re:So in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did lie us into Iraq

    15. Re:So in short by karlowfwb · · Score: 1
      That's sad enough, but the saddest thing is: a bunch of passionate guys (the planetary society) are begging a measly quarter million bucks to save that priceless data, and the administration just stands there! That's like the cost of running a humvee for a week in Iraq or something.
      Ahh, yes. Welcome to the joys of budgets. There isn't enough money to fund everything that everyone wants and everyone things that their (small) project is certainly important enough to warrant getting funds. Problem is that everyone thinks that, and all those small projects add up. Lines have to be drawn, decisions have to be made. You will likely not agree with all of them, but that's why you vote.
    16. Re:So in short by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

      "Einstein won a Nobel Peace Prize for solving one of them"

      That's funny; I can't seem to find him anywhere on the official list of Nobel Peace Prize laureates. Maybe you should have a look: http://nobelprize.org/peace/laureates/index.html

    17. Re:So in short by Arctic+Fox · · Score: 1

      If the presidents ass-hatery has put us into record deficits ... That forces congress (who i'm no great fan of) into a very bad situation.
      I'm sorry, did I miss the decrease in federal spending somewhere?
      Spending hasn't gone down, and won't go down. Ever.

    18. Re:So in short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something that is not our duty is to care about what the outside world thinks about our internal politics

      Funny, sounds like the type of reasoning being used in Iraq in about 2002 by Saddam. Shit, if the US stopped worrying about other countries internal politics, you could recall your troops from more than 70 countries, and be on your way to being a usefull member of the international community, rather than being the prime shit disturber on the planet.

      maybe we should pay some attention to what they think about our politics in relation to them and other countries, simply because you can't have political relationships with other nations unless they come

      Newsflash, you don't have any political relationships left. Your "allies" agree with you, while holding their noses to avoid chocking on the stink that has become known as "US foreign policy". Who is left in the current coalition in Iraq? Australia and the UK?

      The US government works for us, we own it.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!! Oh christ, I almost fell over for that one!! You are correct, someone owns the US government, but it sure as hell isn't the people of the US. It may be "some" people of the US, but it sure as hell isn't you, or anyone you know.

      Keep waving that flag, keep telling yourself that you are free. If you say it often enough, maybe it will come true.

    19. Re:So in short by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Pssst. I agree with you completely, on everything you said. Insulting me isn't getting you anywhere.

      If you had been paying attention, however, you would have noticed I was insulting the particularly repugnant 'If you disagree with the government you are a traitor' Republican idiot.

      When in reality it's his kind of talk that is rejection of all this country stands for. (But, admittedly, does not actually reach at this point in time.)

      Critizing people because they critize the government is crazy in any Republic. You can (and should) critize them because you disagree with their disagreement with the government, but saying 'I don't approve of disagreeing with the government in general' is absurd.

      It implies the government is somehow supposed to be outside the control of the citizens. (Yes, I know it is, but it's not supposed to be.) As the government is The People, advocating that anyone except The People run the government is traitorous speech, just like advocating that England invade and run our government is traitorous speech.

      Of course, in this country, people can speak traitorous speech all they want. I just think it's a bit absurd they are calling people 'unpatriotic' for doing their duty in complaining what they disagree with the government about.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    20. Re:So in short by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Oh, boo-hoo, the word 'Peace' slipped in there by mistake in the hint. That renders everything I said wrong!

      Einstein, for the record, won a Nobel Prize. Not a Nobel Peace Prize.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    21. Re:So in short by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1
      Let me sum up: the USA boldly sends a probe in space, at a very great cost to taxpayers. Some decades later, NASA is forced to scrap the only computer that can access the unique (and very expensive) data collected by said probe, because the administration refuses to fund them properly.
      Well screw the administration, then. Why do we need the government's help on everything? I think the PS is making the right move here, and I'd rather that there was more choice in funding things above and beyond the essential services. I give plenty of money every year in non-tax deductable donations because I'm looking to give money to people who do things I like, instead of looking for a tax break. It should be no problem whatsoever for 5,000 supporters to scrape up $50 a piece, especially if they send it in several transactions.

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    22. Re:So in short by deKernel · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the poor grammer and such, but I get really "cheesed off" when people look for any problem and blame the current President for it.

    23. Re:So in short by Wormholio · · Score: 1

      The early Pioneer data relevant to the anomaly were not kept as carefully as later data, but it turns out they may shed some light on the puzzle. A recent paper here proposes looking at the data in more detail, but this will take time and effort, and therefore money.

      --
      "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats
  21. $250k!? by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Intern + DVD Burner + 50 DVDs (not sure how much data is on those old tapes) = $500 + $15k/year.

    NASA is mothoballing their comp, so pick it up and swap, get an intern to switch tapes and disks, a low end PC with solitare, mine sweeper, and DVD burning software, and viola!

    Take $50k for management, organization, and design of the process and a year later you have the whole thing on DVDs and an intern who can beat the large board of mine sweeper in 45 seconds.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:$250k!? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Who's said to stick the burner in the Cray 2? the Cray 2 already has some form of output, and if it's only output is to tape, then get an old tape reader that has COM/Par out, plug that into a cheap dell special with a burner.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:$250k!? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      IIRC, beating the large board in 45 seconds would be faster than what is currently listed as the fastest time.. the fastest claimed expert time I've seen is around 65 seconds.

  22. WTF! by MatD · · Score: 1

    They are talking about reading this data like it's encrypted with blowfish, and they are deleting the key. How hard can it be to read that tape data? I can't imagine that data from back that was stored in a very complicated format.
    Even if the media was of a propriatary format, it couldn't be that hard to create a reader for it.
    Come on people, it's not like this is rocket scien....Um, never mind.

    --
    Since when did operating systems become a religion?
  23. Why dismantle the computer by coflow · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know why NASA is dismantling the computers if there really is such a potential treasure-trove of knowledge on these tapes? It seems like NASA would be interested in the same type of discoveries that TFA anticipates....

    1. Re:Why dismantle the computer by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does anyone know why NASA is dismantling the computers if there really is such a potential treasure-trove of knowledge on these tapes?

      My guess is the operating cost. Those old machines are very VERY costly to run, between the power they need, the special rooms, and the ridiculous MTBF of the componentry that's measured in dozens of minutes.

      But still, I agree. Scrapping the computer on that reason alone is forgetting the hundreds of millions spent on sending the probe out in space in the first place.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Why dismantle the computer by Bazman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Possibly because the computer is the size of a large room, the tape drive is half the size of a car, and the air-conditioning for it is in danger of melting. Maybe.

      When I was a physicist we had a DEC VAX with a tape drive, it took a whole room, and probably had less power than my laptop. Tape drives are not small things.

    3. Re:Why dismantle the computer by fritter · · Score: 1

      Are the tapes proportionately huge? I have this great mental image of three or four scientists staggering around trying to put a gigantic "Honey I Shrunk The Kids"-type cartridge into a slot.

    4. Re:Why dismantle the computer by Bazman · · Score: 1

      Nah, we used the classic approx 12" diameter reels of what I guess was about 1/2" tape.

      I'm getting all sorts of memories now. The thing was supposed to automatically spool the tape onto the take-up spool, but that was unreliable. To try and make it work you had to trim the end of the tape with a handy trimmer that was kept on top of the drive. This cut the end of the tape into a nice 'V' shape that should feed better. Too much trimming would eventually bite into your data.

      The auto-feed was rubbish even with trimming, so you ended up having to feed it through by hand.

      And the 'write-protect' tags were badly designed too. In order to write-protect a tape you removed the plastic write-protect ring. The best option was to keep one plastic ring per tape DRIVE, not per tape. You kept this on the tape drive. Then you removed all the other rings and played hoop-la with them on the nearest coat-rack.

      If you wanted to write on a tape, you had to insert the ring from the tape drive, hence it was a failsafe mechanism - if you accidentally left a precious tape in the mechanism without a ring you couldnt overwrite it.

      Baz

  24. I'll tell you what the "anomaly" is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    God's will. He doesn't want us exploring outside the solar system He gave us.

    Unless the spacecraft is further out than we expect it to be... in that case, he is speeding the spacecraft along its holy path and he wants mankind to study more of the universe.

    1. Re:I'll tell you what the "anomaly" is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There really needs to be a +1, Sarcastic....

  25. Re:Funding TP by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yep, the military probably spends $250,000 for just ass wipe per day in Iraq.

  26. Lots of other data by couch_warrior · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you think this data loss would be unfortunate, you should check out the Earth Resource Observing Satellite (EROS) Data Center run by the US Geological Survey in Sioux Falls South Dakota. For years NASA has been dumping all manner of data tapes there. 9-track, 24-track, literally hundreds of Terabytes of data. And many of those tapes are literally growing mold, sitting in boxes and racks in the basement, for lack of funding to transfer them to more permanent media.
    Think about it, decades of climate data , going back to the 1970's, is being lost due to lethargy on the part of Clowngress. Or is it lethargy.
    Let's see, three and a half decades of climate change data, detailed and explicit. Hmmmm.... who *wouldn't* want that data placed online where researchers could access it? I wonder.....

    --
    "Sic Semper Path of Least Resistance"
    1. Re:Lots of other data by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I dunno, environmentalist who don't want their theories disproved? Despite some good work in this area, many theories are based on faith not facts.

    2. Re:Lots of other data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, environmentalist who don't want their theories disproved? Despite some good work in this area, many theories are based on faith not facts.

      Just like your comment.

    3. Re:Lots of other data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      informative, reasoned debates. the true strength of slashdot.

    4. Re:Lots of other data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      informative, reasoned debates. the true strength of slashdot.
      In theory, anyway. :)

    5. Re:Lots of other data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, environmentalist who don't want their theories disproved? Despite some good work in this area, many theories are based on faith not facts.

      The only people who would not want to see such data made public have a sense that the facts aren't what they would like them to be. If a climatologist thinks that they have a plausible theory, they want to add to the evidence. The only person who would not want to see such data made public would be one who has a pretty good idea what the data would indicate and has a reason for not wanting that information to become common knowledge.

      Based on my experience and education, I would say that most of people who are telling you that climate change theory is based on faith not facts aren't betting that way with their wallets.

    6. Re:Lots of other data by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Informative

      And based on my extensive personal experience, anyone who expects a couple decades worth of knowledge that WE ALREADY HAVE in other formats (ground based stations, etc) to prove or disprove something as complicated as global climate change (and very sudden, non-linear global climate change, to boot) is going to be disappointed.

      If you are interested in a history going back to at least the 50's, with extremely good resolution, just ask the NOAA for it and they will be happy to furnish you with more information than you will know what to do with.

      I know the parent or grandparent are probably trolls, but this deserves a useful response.

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
    7. Re:Lots of other data by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that theory makes a lot of sense given that there are so many environmentalists in the current administration, who, let's see, actually have the power over moving or hiding this data. Yup - good thinking there.

  27. Why not? by quark007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is there a big hoopla about Planetary society raising meager $250,000?

    You need money to carry out research.
    NASA obviously doesn't care much about basic sciences, and is quite busy wasting tax dollars in 'spectacular' but dumb and useless shuttle launches.

    Planetary society is atleast trying to make some sense. Why not help them?

    --
    - Sh!t
    1. Re:Why not? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative
      Why is there a big hoopla about Planetary society raising meager $250,000? You need money to carry out research. NASA obviously doesn't care much about basic sciences, and is quite busy wasting tax dollars in 'spectacular' but dumb and useless shuttle launches.
      NASA cares plenty about basic science - and the basic science these tapes were meant to accomplish was accomplished decades ago. (In fact a great deal of both the data and the science is available on the web.) What TPS wants to do is 'extended science', something NASA has been trying to get funding for over the past few years - but has been unable to do so.

      TPS is essentially lying to you when it claims the tapes haven't been read or analyzed.

  28. But how huge? by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For instance, how much data is there? I've read some of the linked articles and I can't find any estimate of how many MB there might be. I would guess that there isn't a massive amount of data simply because the thing was designed within the limits of 1970s technology and they had to be able to record the data as it was coming in.

    Also, I would be shocked if NASA didn't document any of the file formats used. I've worked on a NASA project and they are all about documentation. In fact, I was writing a system used to document the shuttle booster production process.

    1. Re:But how huge? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      But did they document where to find the important parts in those huge amounts of documentation?

    2. Re:But how huge? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quick math. 40 years at 16 bits per second, that's right, 16 BITS per second, is... 19.2MB of data.

      BTW, the Pioneer spacecraft were launched in the 1960's, not 70's, so even older tech.

    3. Re:But how huge? by putaro · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quick but wrong.

      16 bits * 3600 secs/hr = 57600 bits or 5760 bytes (I usually divide bps by 10 to get bytes because of things like parity and other protocol overhead)
      5760 bytes/hr * 24 hr = 195840 bytes/day
      195840bytes/day * 365 days/year = 71481600 bytes/year
      71 MB/year * 40 = 2840 MB

      Still a trivial amount by today's standards but I think you need to check those flashing fingers of yours on the calculator.

    4. Re:But how huge? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sweet. We can put it on my phone!

    5. Re:But how huge? by sim82 · · Score: 1

      Let google do the work:
      me: '40 years * 16 bits per second in gigabyte'
      google: (40 years) * 16 (bits per second) = 2.3511742 gigabyte

    6. Re:But how huge? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Several years ago my father (who is a retired research scientist) commented that he had the cumulative data of some 7 years of research in a obsolete database system (MUMPS) on a 9 track tape squirreled away in his office closet...He really would have liked to look at that data, but no drive was available to read it.
      Thanks to the Internet, and one international mail list I was a member of, I found a wonderful lady at a government data center who was willing to copy the data to a modern medium. And, it was a good thing I put in my request when I did; their one remaining 9 track tape drive was being decommissioned the next month!
      A quick visit to the the UPS fairy and the tape was on its way. A week later I get an email to check a particular ftp for a tar ball and there it was: 30 mbs. - 7 years of research; a mere blip on a modern jump drive......
      Dad was delighted. That data is now on CD, 4 separate hard drives in 2 physical locations, and even an actual paper printout.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    7. Re:But how huge? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I suppose the rule about correct people's spelling also applies to correcting people's math...

      5670 * 24 = 138240

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    8. Re:But how huge? by cnettel · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If Doppler data is relevant, and has been saved, this indicates that there can be quite a lot of metadata, in addition to the transmission itself.

      (I would imagine that 16 bps is the raw data rate from the probe?)

    9. Re:But how huge? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      And my post proves my own point :)

      It's 5760, not 5670, though the multiplication does comes out to 138240 when you put the right numbers in.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    10. Re:But how huge? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 1

      Ack. Sorry. That should have been Gb, not MB in my original post. MB was simply habitual, I type MB too often.

    11. Re:But how huge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey watch out ... don't go calling MUMPS obsolete it's still in use in quite a few HOSPITALS. Your next hospital stay has a good chance of touching MUMPS somewhere -- especially if you are at a large center.

    12. Re:But how huge? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Actually I know it well. Dad's grant provided hardware support (on a PDP/11-40) but no funding for software support after inital purchase. Guess who provided tech support?
      I said "obsolete" in that the version we were running ran under (now this is a 30 year old memory so bare with me) RSTS (pre-Unix). I do recall the machine booted from a paper tape...
      MUMPS is now called "M" isn't it?

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    13. Re:But how huge? by 'nother+poster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes. 16 bps on an 8W transmitter. At least for the pioneer 6-10 series if I read the data correctly.

    14. Re:But how huge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MUMPS isn't obsolete. In fact, I use it every day at work!

    15. Re:But how huge? by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      close, but from TFS:
      it is the complete archive of the first 15 years of all the data returned to Earth
    16. Re:But how huge? by Jerry+Coffin · · Score: 1
      For instance, how much data is there?

      As you'd expect, the exact amount of data is hard to guess. The most common tape densities are 1600, 3200 and 6250 FCI. Reel sizes range from 100 to 3600 feet. Figuring for worst case, if they're 3600 foot reels at 6250 FCI, each reel holds about 240 MB.

      Seven-track tapes are old enough that they're normally written at lower density, but offhand I don't remember what the maximum density for them normally was.

      In the end, storing the data isn't really a majory concern -- even given a few thousand reels like this, a few hundred dollars would cover all the necessary hard-drive space pretty easily. The real problems are that 1) 7- and 9- track drives are now pretty rare, and 2) most of them used more or less proprietary channels to connect to the mainframe. As such, reading the tapes requires either finding function drives AND matching computers, or elese building new tape drives that can connect via SCSI or something on that order. The practicality of that approach might be open to some question though -- despite low-tech electronics, tape drives required quite precise mechanics if I'm not mistaken.

      As far as data formats go, quite a few tapes had "labels", which were basically blocks of metadata to tell about the format of the rest of the tape. This didn't tell much about the logical format, but it did tell you things like the sizes of blocks and such. Of course, it's not really quite that simple: there were (at least) a couple of conflicting formats for the labels too...

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.

      --
      The universe is a figment of its own imagination.
    17. Re:But how huge? by chris_sawtell · · Score: 1

      Please don't imagine that your data is safely archived on CD. Writeable CDs, as opposed to the manufactured read-only recordings, can suffer from bit-rot after only a few months.

    18. Re:But how huge? by ArcticCelt · · Score: 1

      2840 MB?

      Good, that means we can simply ship them a 199$ iPod mini so they can drop all the stuff in.

      Problem solved, Next!

      --

      Yahh, hiii haaaaa! -Major Kong, from Dr. Strangelove
  29. What about the hardware itself? by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 3, Informative
    Does anyone have any idea what these machines are or whether they can be saved from the scrapper?

    As for the data, a lot of people here seem to be really naive about how hard it is to recover old data like this. "Just download it onto a hard disk." Well, yeah, but the trick is getting working 9-track drives (relatively easy) and 7-track drives (much harder) and going through the effort required to ensure you get the data off successfully instead of destroying it. (Remember, these tapes are very old and probably extremely fragile, and you may only get one shot at recovering the data.)

    1. Re:What about the hardware itself? by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sounds like a job for The Computer Museum.

    2. Re:What about the hardware itself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention an interface from the machines that can run the tape drives to ones that can run modern hardware.

      It's pretty scary how obsolete some of the stuff the government uses is. I was involved in the Columbia investigation, and we got data from at least one tracking station as lineprinter output! That's right, 4 inches thick of about 10"x14" lineprinter output.

    3. Re:What about the hardware itself? by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 2, Informative

      It seems at least a couple of important people there know about the situation, judging from this recent message on the cctalk classic-computing mailing list. (Sellam Ismail is the museum's software curator. I don't know if Al Kossow actually works for the museum, but he's certainly contributed a great deal to preserving computer history.)

  30. Rather qualified by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First, the data first must be recovered, validated, documented, and preliminary analyses must be done. After those tasks are completed (probably taking months to a year),

    Why not publish the data immediately, and qualify and expand it as they go along?

    Rich.

    1. Re:Rather qualified by terrymr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably because publishing 10010100101001010100101001010100101010101001 .... isn't going to help you a whole lot without knowledge of where you are in the data stream, what instrument is telling you that etc.

      The validation, documentation & preliminary analysis steps are all about taking the raw data stream and making it into a useful set of values.

    2. Re:Rather qualified by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Quite honestly, Validation and documentation are really all that are needed, although translation into legible data sets would be nice. Of course, place the first two on the web, and you'll get your translation/preliminary analysis for free probably within days....

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    3. Re:Rather qualified by heavy_metal_chemist · · Score: 0

      Probably because publishing 10010100101001010100101001010100101010101001 .... isn't going to help you a whole lot without knowledge of where you are in the data stream, what instrument is telling you that etc. Did you say 10010100101001010100101001010100101010101001 it's the end of the world!!!

    4. Re:Rather qualified by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      The Question still doesnt seem answered (sorry if i have missed the answer, feel free to point me in the right direction) is exactly what the data IS. is it raw analouge recorded transmissions?. Or perhaps the actual probe data, Computer "monitoring" type data from the recording, multiple telemetry data sets, and a raw copy of the transsmisisons to boot?

      This could be a lot more data than just what the probe sent back, and id be willing to bet that it is.

      And if it is or contains an actual Analouge record of the transsmisions (a likely possibility given the age and nature of the medium) then its an entire stage more difficult.

      id say $250 thousand isnt much when you think about how much tape their could be, and just how large an item it would be to transport safely to a facility capable of ensuring accurate reproduction of the tapes for reading the data and analysis of the tapes themselves to help work out exactly what it is. Standard data recovery/analysis techniques number numero uno. Make a Copy. Then work on that. Youve only got one original, Its priceless and all steps should be taken to ensure its handled as little as possible.

      The tapes may not survive more than 2 or 3 reads. So they better get it right 1st time... $250K seems resonable for a data recovery project this size.

      Anyone care to get a quote from a data recovery firm on 3miles or more of 9 track tape about 30 years old?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  31. tinfoil? by flibberdi · · Score: 1

    I read somewhere about the pioneer anomaly, but to be honest, this theory seem to complicated for my brainwashed eh...brain..

    1. Re:tinfoil? by cnettel · · Score: 1
      Don't bother reading it. It's basically a crusade against general relativity based on points like "precession of Mercury is not explained but is described", like you could somehow have a theory that really "exaplined" anything at all.

      There is also some glorious flaws in logic, like that a photon travelling a longer distance (in non-expanding space) would be reddened and that the seemingly red sun when it dawns would be caused by a longer distance between the Sun and Earth. It's not like a longer distance through the atmosphere, due to the low angle, would enhance the effects that all day long makes the sky blue.

      The observation that gravity couldn't be transmitted through vacuum, as vacuum doesn't contain anything, and therefore space couldn't be curved (because the curvation would be "something") is also... interesting.

      Now, there may be flaws in GR, but we won't expose them by reading Newton in manuscript, like these guys do.

  32. Another Reason by lbmouse · · Score: 0

    The reason for the anomaly may be as mundane as uneven radiation pressure or escaping thruster fuel or it may be as groundbreaking as a clue to completely new physics, perhaps related to dark matter or dark energy.

    Or maybe my mother-in-law is driving.

  33. GPL the Data by afroncio · · Score: 1

    It would certainly interest readers of /. a lot more if the data were GPL'd. I don't see any reason why data like this shouldn't be accessible to all.

    1. Re:GPL the Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That has to be one of the most ignorant and/or uninformed statement i heard whole week.

      GPL the data, yea, right...sheesh.

    2. Re:GPL the Data by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      If it were actual data you could FOIA it.
      Right now I think you could argue it's
      just media.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    3. Re:GPL the Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accessible to all != GPL

      If you want the data accessible to everyone, put it in the Public Domain. Don't abuse the GPL.

      ...
      has /. bot-scanner become open to dictionary attacks? My current "random" letters spell "ankles"

    4. Re:GPL the Data by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

      GPL? Sure, there is so much value in being able to modify that data ...

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    5. Re:GPL the Data by afroncio · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. My mistake - I guess I posted too quickly and really meant to put the data in the public domain.

      Thanks to all those who offered a correction.

    6. Re:GPL the Data by afroncio · · Score: 1

      No, I've been reading /. for a long time. I just posted a little too quickly. I meant to say, "put the data in the public domain", but used the wrong term.

      For that matter I wonder out loud if there isn't a kind of data licence whereby any subsequent redistribution of the post-processing on the data might not be subject to a GPL-like agreement...?

      For instance, if you were to publish an article on your post-processing of the data, you might have to supply the original data in some form...

  34. Re:9-track? by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Why not transfer the whole data to DVD and then sell copies of the DVD? NASA get to do their research, and other people get to analyse the data in new and interesting ways.

    Selling? First, they are making these data files freely available for download. Second, these data sets contain no cool image or anything that tickles fancy from Jane and Joe Sixpacks. So I'd expect less than 1000 copies would be sold if it were to be on the market.

    And not that many engineers or scientists are qualified enough to entangle a problem like this. This is one of those precision engineering at first, and then science next.

    For those who are wondering about the high cost....for hiring two good engineers for full-time year (two FTEs), it would cost over 150K (incl. a typical NASA overhead). The rest goes to hardware and administration. Yeah, it'd be nice if every qualified individual jumps in to study what goes on with the Pioneer datasets. That'd be neat and cheap. But that's just some utopian thought that is unlikely to materialize (I'm sure there are more crackpot *self-acclaimed* theorists who would come forward to explain away this anomaly from philosophical standpoint).

  35. A worthy cause, but $250,000.00?? by gwait · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, it's not a lot of cash in the scheme of things,
    but why the hell won't NASA just donate the computer and tapes to a university? If they're going to toss it in the trash, they should be interested in giving it away for free. Put the data on the Web for all, and we're done. In fact NASA themselves should be able to do this inside of a week or two, presumably they know how to read these tapes themselves..
    I don't see where anyone needs to raise $250K..??
    Please explain yourselves, planetary society types..

    --
    Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
    1. Re:A worthy cause, but $250,000.00?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please send $250,000 shipping and handling...

  36. Nah-SA by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    It is insane that NASA can spend billions on several years of exploding and cancelled Shuttle launches, including millions putting talking NASA heads on TV, but can't spend $250K to recover that invaluable Voyager data. It costs more than $250K for NASA just to throw away the old machines! It's obvious from stunts like this that NASA is primarily a welfare job for aerospace contractors, and secondarily a mask for military Star Wars missions. Way down the list, below "take out the garbage", is "science".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  37. Frame dragging by CarlJagt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Easy, its frame dragging on a large, solar system scale. We only see hints of it now because of the large distances the Pioneers have travelled.

    Next...

    1. Re:Frame dragging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My truck is muffler dragging. Similar?

    2. Re:Frame dragging by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      Actually frame-dragging only occurs near a massive rotating body, not far away from it.

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  38. Enough about "dark" matter/energy already! by csoto · · Score: 1

    Geez, first of all, matter IS energy. This has been proven over Bikini, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, etc.

    Secondly, it's only "dark" because we can't see it. Obviously, if it's there, but we haven't observed it yet, it's "dark matter." There is nothing inherently unique about it. We're just not omniscient.

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  39. I own a Kennedy 9-Track and a very old 7 track by jbottoms · · Score: 5, Informative

    These tapes should be readable on any midrange or mainframe. I own a Pr1me computer which should serve the purpose. Contactinformation is below: Jeffrey Bottoms, 4405 Pease #3, Houston, TX 77023

    1. Re:I own a Kennedy 9-Track and a very old 7 track by Schwarzchild · · Score: 1

      How do you keep your Prime computer running? Can you still get parts for that?

      --

      "sweet dreams are made of this..."

  40. $250k? Easy! by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1

    Just design a space-glove, and NASA themselves will supply the quarter-mil.

    --
    "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
    ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    1. Re:$250k? Easy! by fandog · · Score: 1

      1: "Only the Sith deal in absolutes."

      Which, in itself, is an absolute statement.

      Anyway, there's got to be more to this story for this to be a 'problem', considering they could donate the whole system to any university, and the stuff would eventually get copied... I'm beginning to think this is just NASA's newest attempt to threaten a beloved program to try and get more money out of the gov't. You know, when a bunch of civilians sucessfully designed, built and launched a spacecraft for, what, $35 million, how much bloat must be in NASA for us to give them umpteen-billion $ every year, and have them only fly a 'truck' into low orbit once or twice a year, and play around with the leo spacestation?

      Wonder how much it'd cost a private company to do the same service...

  41. 9 track and other Archaic data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last year I worked on a project which was responsible for transferring satillite images of earth (for weather, a NOAA project). They were stored on 9 track tapes and other slightly better tape archiving methods. 9 track tapes have a horrible lifetime, of all the nine-track tapes that we tried to play we got one to work. The machines that play the tapes themselves are old and constantly needing repair. We only got to try to copy nine-track tapes about twice a month or less because the player kept dying. I understand why NASA does it. My job ended when the project ran out of funding, and this was after several extensions to the project. Not all the data was completely backed up and there were lots of errors. At least the NOAA is trying to archive lots of this data, but it takes time and money. Both of which are finite.

  42. I think this is being distorted and dramatized by i41Overlord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First of all, why would NASA have years worth of data coming in from a spacecraft they launched, and NOT have analysed it? I find this very hard to believe. Also, if they thought this information held valuable clues to a puzzling scientific mystery, they would have surely looked into it. In addition, how can this tape player be the only one on Earth that can read these tapes?

    I think that the issue is being distorted and blown out of proportion. I have a feeling that someone wanted to further their pet cause and they didn't mind letting pesky facts get in their way.

    1. Re:I think this is being distorted and dramatized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not real familiar on this particular data set, but I have kept up a little on the Pioneer anomoly. I would suspect that this is an archive of telemetry data which is typicall used in the fashion of "Is our probe still there? Where is it? How fast is it going? Everything look okay? Good, let's dig into the data from the science instruments."

      The time consuming analysis that probably has not been done is to chart all that data over time and do a detailed analysis comparing it to similar intervals / situations, expectations, and so forth.

      Given that this is pre-1988 data, and the anomoly (an unexpected "slowing down" or sunward force dragging on the crafts) was detected sometime after that, it wouldn't surprise me in the least that this data was archived and never thoroughly analyzed.

  43. This is typical of Govt funded thought processes. by cbelt3 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not surprised that NASA was unable to develop funding to convert / analyze this data. After working with them for a few years, and with the 'Military Industrial Complex" for more than that, I can clearly say:
    "If it isn't in the requirements document, it's not going to get done, no matter how simple or beneficial it is."

    I worked on a project back in the early 80's. We were launching missles on a test range. I was responsible for the telemetry recording. We used a massive Honeywell tape drive and a bunch of telemetry circuitry to record at 1MHz. After designing the circuitry to measure and feed the data (all analog, BTW) to the drives, I asked my boss where the specs were for the circuitry to read the data back off the tapes for analysis.

    I was told there wasn't any. It wasn't a requirement. And I had better leave it at that. I kind of freaked- how the hell can we spend $100K in hardware and time to record tapes that can never, ever be read ?

    The answer ? It was basically butt covering. If something happened they would ask the gummint to fund a project to read the data off the tapes.

    I went ahead and designd and built a playback system on the side, nights and weekends. We went ahead and launched missles. We had guidance failures. I was asked to read the tapes. I pulled out my breadboarded setup, and read the tapes. The project team was happy, problems were solved, etc.

    And I was put on the next layoff list for 'failing to obey orders'. So I got a better job, and quit before the axe fell (large defense contractor axes fell sloowly back then- lots of little clerk types had to spent their quality time with each piece of paper).

    The Moral ? Never underestimate the stupidity of large organizations- governmental or otherwise.

  44. Chump change by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

    250k isn't that much. Apply with an academic to a funding council/EU Framework 6 (hint: section 4)/etc etc or something. Or get the money out of Lockheed Martin (they could do with some PR) or Microsoft etc. This isn't really the sort of thing that requires a public appeal IMHO, its a 250k tax write-off for someone who'll be glad of the opportunity.

    Perhaps I'm missing something special about this?

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  45. $250,000, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why pay cash when you can barter? I hear a decent pair of gloves goes for around $250k at NASA these days.

  46. Why not just..... by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    .... send the collecting plate around? Try some of those desk-bound career bureaucrats at NASA, they might be interested in getting involved in some science as a break from office politics.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  47. twin star by temponaut · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the gravitational effects could be explained by the existence of an orbiting brown dwarf as hypothesized by the Binary Research Institute. It would be interesting to see if the strength of the gravitational pull fits the parameters of the companion star deduced from the meteor shower periodicity and the angular momentum and lunar cycle.

  48. Copying is bad politics. This is about funding. by r00t · · Score: 1

    The whole point of threatening to kill a well-loved
    or historical project is to get funding. See, for
    example, the Pluto probe or the reception of
    deep-space transmissions from some of our older craft.

    Meanwhile, pork projects completely unrelated to
    space can never be cut.

    And I swear, the Space Shuttle must have a part
    built in every congressional district.

  49. re: tape baking by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as I understand it, this need to bake tapes to resuce them was only an issue because of a specific type of "binder" glue used in their original production. I believe Maxell was one of the companies responsible for using what turned out to be poor binder, between a certain set of production years, for example.

    That's why you'll see plenty of people having no problem playing back 20+ year old tapes, yet others have huge problems.

  50. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the moral is:
    Never do anything for free.

    You created a way to read data off of the tapes for free instead of waiting for the need and then charging for it.

    That is the way businesses work with the government. Charge for everything. Don't do anything for free.

  51. Intelligent trajectory by kanweg · · Score: 1

    The explanation must be the hand of God (if not another holy body part). Where can I sign to lobby Congress (by a spin doctor, no less) that alternative theories should not be taught at schools.

    Bert

  52. Re:Funding TP by fallen1 · · Score: 1
    Yep, the military probably spends $250,000 for just ass wipe per day in Iraq.

    He's not shitting! That's a good estimate for it. Why did you all mod Camel Pilot as funny?? What? Why are you all laughing at me? ;)

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  53. thats not fair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first I think it'll be a great thing if they can get access to and recover the data, but Its not fair that theyre just scrapping the computer? I'll take it! I've got a few historic systems, but nothing quite that big yet.

  54. Charty is a sign of a "decrepit" country? by Shihar · · Score: 1

    "...like a decrepit country where non-profit orgs are forced to take matters into their own hands..."

    Err, isn't that the ideal way of doing it? The logic is pretty simple. Taxes are collected with the threat of violence. Fail to pay our taxes then the police show up at your house and throw you in jail and confiscate your property. So, whenever the government does something with tax money, it is collecting that money with the threat of violence. I am not saying this isn't necessary, but it isn't exactly ideal. The ideal is for people to contribute to society without putting them at gun point.

    So, whenever charity does something that government could have done, that is a success, not a sign of a 'decrepit' country. It means that people cared enough to act voluntarily, instead of having the majority impose its will on the minority with the threat of violence. Personally, I think the sign of a 'decrepit' civil society is when people only do things when the government threatens them with violence. A healthy society can accomplish altruistic acts WITHOUT resorting to violence or the threat there of.

    1. Re:Charty is a sign of a "decrepit" country? by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 1

      It's just this kind of vigilante altruism that is against everything we stand for!

      --
      I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
  55. In defense of dark matter/energy by jpflip · · Score: 1

    There's actually a lot of evidence that the missing dark "stuff" is different than any stuff we've ever encountered before.

    Dark Matter: Most of the dark matter isn't ordinary matter (less than 1/5 of it can be, if I remember the numbers right). There's very strong evidence from primordial chemical element abundances and from studies of the cosmic microwave background that, whatever it is, it's not made up of protons/neutrons/electrons the way ordinary matter is. It's true that there's some ordinary matter leftover that we haven't observed or accounted for, but when people talk about the mysteries of dark matter they're usually talking about the weird stuff. Best guess is some new kind of elementary particle (or some modification to gravity), which is certainly interesting.

    Dark Energy: This isn't just ordinary energy/matter. Ordinary energy and matter slow down the universe's expansion by their gravitational attraction. Whatever this stuff is, its main attribute is that it's causing the expansion of the universe to speed up! This is also certainly interesting.

    Yes, it is stuff we've never seen, and yes we're far from omniscient. But there's definitely no "just" about it!

    1. Re:In defense of dark matter/energy by blincoln · · Score: 1

      There's actually a lot of evidence that the missing dark "stuff" is different than any stuff we've ever encountered before.

      My money is on it being the result of gravitons passing between branes. Every other explanation I've seen sounds rickety:

      - Um, there's... lots of... stuff. That we can't see. No, really, it's invisible in the radio, microwave, infrared, visible, ultraviolet, x-ray, and gamma-ray bands.

      - Mainstream physics is unable to see the truth of the gravimetreon particle because of dogmatic thinking! Fortunately I have discovered it using an apparatus modelled after eyewitness accounts of UFO engines!

      - Jesus made dark matter to test your faith!

      - Electric Universe!

      - Buggy code in the Matrix!

      - Quintessons! I mean Quintessence! Although Quintessence is very much like the Quintessons in that five-faced tentacled robots seem at least as contrived as "the quintessence field [having] a density which closely tracks (but is less than) the radiation density until matter-radiation equality, which triggers quintessence to start behaving as dark energy, eventually dominating the universe."

      Am I missing anything?

      I realize that m-theory is still untestable in a lab, but at least it provides a logical framework for understanding why something like this might happen.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  56. Donate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just donated my $5 with PayPal, everyone else do likewise.

    That this much interesting data would just be thrown away is ridiculous. If everyone on slashdot spares $5 that goal can be met or atleast chipped away at pretty good.

  57. Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Paul Allen, you reading... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...this? Get your damn wallet out!

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  58. Why is that? by iamacat · · Score: 1

    If you are one of the few people with skills to interpret raw data for this kind of project, you will have no problem getting the data for a cost trivial compared to your time. Isn't it better to insist on open source where public will actually benefit?

    1. Re:Why is that? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're asking the right questions.
      Just because I may not be skilled enough to read it now doesn't mean I won't have the incentive to learn it when the data is available to me.
      Once the data is in public, I have no doubt that there will be some open source code available for reading it.

    2. Re:Why is that? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      So - did you ever learn a new area to Ph.D+ level just because some data was publicly available and write some source code to interpret it for the rest of us? Human genome must be keeping you awfully busy.

    3. Re:Why is that? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Why should not having a PHD stop me? You must be a blast to have as a friend.
      I've built/understood/engineered many things that I previously had no knowledge about - it's called curiosity - some of us thrive on it.

    4. Re:Why is that? by iamacat · · Score: 1

      All right, just out of curiosity - what have you built/understood and engineered which is comparable in complexity to gravity interactions of all the bodies in solar system? Did you do any work on other publicly available science information like Maya writing samples, Hubble images, SETI data (your own algorithms, not the screensaver), seismic records or AIDS genome?

  59. Speaking of 9-Track by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I've got a DEC auto-loader unit that's just sitting and collecting dust.

    Of course it's promised to the state dept. of education.

    But this brings up a very good point. There happens to be loads of data that is unreadable because the technology is seriously obsolete (8" Floppy anyone?) and not in widespread use. The same thing is happening to 9-track tape now. And it won't be long before CD's, DVD's, and ever DAT and DLT are ancient history.

    In the past you just upgraded to the newest storage technology. But there are still many, many paper tapes, 9-track tapes etc. out there.

    Fortunately there are retro computing groups that lovingly restore ancient hardware. For example:
    http://www.osfn.org/rcs/

  60. Re:Funding TP by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    Considering transportation costs, you'd probably be close.

  61. c not constant? by traveyes · · Score: 1

    found this:
    PIONEER 10 AND 11 ACCELERATION ANOMALY

    Basically says (i think), that one possible explanation is c is not constant.

    .

    1. Re:c not constant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Setterfield is a creationist nut who has been pushing variable-light speed theories for some time now, and is grabbing anything he can find to use as "evidence" to support this. Search under "Setterfield c-decay" for more info; I think there's something about its debunking it on talkorigins.org.

    2. Re:c not constant? by Ginnungagap42 · · Score: 1

      Talk Origins has an article debunking Barry Setterfield:

      http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/c-decay.html/>

    3. Re:c not constant? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      There's a general principle that's worth following when doing science (and in life in general). When faced with a bunch of possibilities you start by considering the most likely one and then work your way towards the less likely ones. For example if your car won't start in the morning you hypothesize that something has failed within the car before suggesting that maybe the laws of thermodynamics have failed today.

      The c-not-constant hypothesis is pretty low down the list.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  62. This is a problem... by Siener · · Score: 2, Informative

    Danny Hillis of the Long Now Foundation has been pointing out these kinds of problems for years.

    Most types of digital storage is not good for conserving data in the long run. Hardware changes. File formats change. Most digital media have a very limited lifetime.

    As an example: We have a very good record of the letters that Greek philosophers wrote to each other 2000 years ago. On the other had there's loads of important research data from the early days of computing that's already lost forever.

  63. NASA spent way more than that... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...the past week determining they don't have any idea what caused the Shuttle fuel sensor to read wrong. So they have decided to just ignore it if it happens again, more or less, when they try to launch tomorrow.

    Too bad they couldn't have dropped the coin on the Pioneer analysis for past paid-for launches that were ALREADY successful.

  64. Re:Funding TP by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's funny because of all the cheese and peanutbutter they pack in MREs. You never shit after eating those things, and $250,000 is way to much to be spending on TP for a bunch of non-shitting soldiers.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  65. All about da ca$h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's first thought is "what?! all the data probably fits onto one modern-day hard drive!" but I bet you the issues here are financial. NASA can't dedicate anyone to any tasks or projects without going through 3 feet of red tape to get funding and project approvals, etc, etc...

  66. Sell it on ebay! by qualico · · Score: 1

    Put the stuff up for sale on eBay.

    Some business savvy type could buy it, (shipping may cost more), but then you could sell the data to The Planetary Society for $1 mill and profit!

  67. Some background... by ear1grey · · Score: 4, Informative

    This paper reviews the current status of the anomaly and describes how the Pioneer data could help. It may be a bit math-intensive for some, but the words surrounding the sums do pull them all into focus.

  68. OT: your site by dotgain · · Score: 1

    from one photographer to another: Nice work! Damn fine.

  69. Re:It's obviously an alien plot. -- missing step by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Funny

    1.Deviate spacecrafts from their precisely-planned flightpaths.
    2.Blockbuster movie staring famous Scientologist.
    3.Profit!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  70. Whenever I hear of stuff like this... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    ...I wonder why it wasn't transfered to a proper medium in good time. The cost would be far far less. Don't care about the format, don't care about doing anything with it... just a raw bit-by-bit copy. Tapes? (my C64) 5 1/4" floppies? 3 1/2" floppies? Nothing stored on those anymore. I got DVDs, and legacy CDs. And I'm considering a 400GB external drive to act as an even bigger and easier back-up. And I all did it before they became something you need to go to a museum to find readers for.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  71. Re:I can help - RTFA please by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have an 8-track deck in my Charger...

    Will you please RTFA. It clearly says 7 and 9 track tapes.

    But given the obvious age of your vehicle, I'm sure it can be lined up for a stand-in role in The Dukes of Hazzard 2 -- The Search for our Alienated Fans.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  72. Lemme get this straight.. by Halvy · · Score: 0

    We pay BILLIONS of dollars to 'get this hidden information', and they (NASA) are going to just trash everything soon.

    'The Planetary Society' wants to get the tapes so they can do further research 'with-our-help-in-the-form-of-money'.

    I have an idea, lets put the tapes out for EVERYONE to go over so there is a greater chance for success in this project.

    I am suspect of 'The Planetary Society' request since it implies that they arn't asking some 'big-wigs' instead of common working class folks..

    And they (the Society) are basically saying that 'they' are the only ones that can handle this, but that NOONE else can.. ha.

    -- The InterNet is a terrible things to waste, arrest bill gates immediately, and shut down microsoft.

    --
    I will gladly loose all of life's battles.. in order to win the war..
  73. Re:Funding TP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? Peter Pan makes me shit like a fairy.

  74. Re:Have you heard of Nero? The Secret Revealed by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I worked with audio tape for years, and tape older than 10 years had to be literally baked (heated & cooled again) before playing. If you didn't bake an old tape the filings from the tape would slough off onto the reading heads...you might (if you were lucky) get one play out of an unbaked tape, but the audio on the tape would definitely be destroyed.

    So that's why audio cassettes left in hot cars all summer long remain playable for years -- even when their plastic cassettes are warped almost beyond the point of insertion into the players.

    This deserves a Wikipedia entry for sure!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  75. Just plain and simple physics... by uweg · · Score: 1
  76. Re:Funding TP by modecx · · Score: 1

    Heck, I'd be suprised if it were that little.

    Someone's got to figure how much they use. Too funny.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  77. Re:I call shenanigans by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps it is because most of the people on the Internet have no clue what they are looking for. It costs money to get a real scientist to study something.

  78. I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by david.given · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...and the situation is as follows:
    • The data used to be stored on magnetic tape. When the tape started deteriorating, all the data was archived off onto then state-of-the-art MO disks.
    • The machine used was a MicroVAX with a DEC RWZ21 SCSI MO drive, which is apparently quite rare. The disks are 128MB each.
    • For Pioneer 10, there are 155 disks, making 19840 MB of data.
    • For Pioneer 11, there are 217 disks, making 27776 MB of data.
    • Each disk takes about 10 minutes to read to the MicroVAX, and then more time to move across onto a real computer, of course.

    I would have happily volunteered to spend a couple of days swapping disks in order to salvage all this lot, but alas, I'm the wrong side of the Atlantic. The guy in charge has recently been made redundant, and he was desperate to find someone to hand off all this to... but there's incredible beaurocracy. (I gather all the data was actually supposed to have been destroyed some years ago, but through some 'oversight' hadn't been.)

    Alas, I don't have permission to publish his address, but I'll put him in touch with the Planetary Society on the off chance he doesn't know about this.

    Interestingly, for years he ran the Pioneer spacecraft off a Mac Quadra 950! Check out the screen shots...

    1. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm, don't think I've got an RWZ21 on hand, unless it was also sold under another brand name, but I've got a couple of spare MicroVAXen in the garage. And a VAX 6000, for that matter. Guess I'll have to dig around in the junk pile a bit...

    2. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by jayrtfm · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that your friend was eventually able to read the MO disks on his Quadra, as there were a few programs which allowed Macs to access SCSI media.

    3. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by springbox · · Score: 1

      Each disk takes about 10 minutes to read to the MicroVAX .. and then more time to move across onto a real computer, of course.

      Ouch. That must have stung. You're lucky computers don't have feelings.

    4. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never used a Micro-Vax. They're these humdrum beige boxes, smallish and incredibly heavy for their small size. Also incredibly slow. Last time I powered one up, it took about 12 minutes for VMS to get up to the point where it told me: "Your license for TCP/IP has expired". While mulling this over, it informed several other licenses had expired. IIRC I did get a login prompt about 30 minutes after power-up. I think I was able to salvage the power cord, and a SCSI terminator. Everything else went into the dumpster.

    5. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by ankhank · · Score: 1

      So -- the Planetary Society is still saying "dusty old tapes -- have you gotten them in touch with each other?

      If they change their page to say they got the MO disks, I'm going to send them a hunk of money for sure.

      That RWZ21 drive appears to be currently available for sale, used or refurbished, several places-- Google.

    6. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That RWZ21 drive appears to be currently available for sale, used or refurbished, several places

      Indeed. For $899 at http://www.varx.com/index.html, for example. You can probably do better, that's just the first one I found.

      Wonder what they need the other $249,101 for?

    7. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by sribe · · Score: 1

      The machine used was a MicroVAX with a DEC RWZ21 SCSI MO drive, which is apparently quite rare. The disks are 128MB each.

      Are you talking about 5-1/4" MOs? Those didn't get much use, true, but they were used in other systems, some from Canon I think. (What was in the NeXT stations?) In short, though they weren't all that popular, I wouldn't rule out finding some old computer on eBay that could read them...

    8. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I'd be willing to swap disks too, although I suspect I'm on the wrong side of the continent.

      This is what bugs me - there are tons of people out there who'd do it for free. Where does this $250k come from? We just want to get the information out there and safe, we can worry about finding someone to interpret it later!

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    9. Re:I talked to the guy who used to run Pioneer... by david.given · · Score: 1
      So -- the Planetary Society is still saying "dusty old tapes -- have you gotten them in touch with each other?

      I actually turned out to have my wires crossed. The Planetary Society aren't interested in the actual data; they're analysing the signal for Doppler shifts, to get a more accurate picture of the spacecraft's motion. Which means the MO disks aren't any use to them, because they just contain the sanitised digital telemetry.

      (He's actually making progress converting the MO disks, on his own time as there isn't any money to fund him; the Pioneer 10 data is done, and he's reached 1976 for Pioneer 11. It makes me feel awfully young --- I was born in 1975!)

  79. I got this same email this morning... by telstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only it was from the Nigerian Planetary Society, and they promised a return on my investment.

  80. rotation increases intertia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The answer is simple. Angular momentum is also relative. The rotation of the craft slightly increases its total mass (intertia) in the same way that an accelerated particle increases in mass. The spin of the craft thus increases the "pull" of the suns gravitational field.

  81. A few questions by laing · · Score: 1

    1) Why does it cost so much just to read a bunch of old tapes and store the data in a new format? (A single 500GB SATA drive ought to do it!)

    2) There may be no plans to send any more SPIN STABILIZED spacecraft out that way, but there are plans to send 3 axis spacecraft. Why would the method of attitude control have anything at all to do with this phenomenon?

  82. Tape reading hardware? by newandyh-r · · Score: 1

    9-track tape drives are stil relatively easy to come by. Seven track is rather more difficult but I wouldn't expect it to be a particularly difficult job to make a 7-track head for a more modern (9-track) drive and use a FPGA or similar to "massage" the data so that the rest of the drive firmware will work.

  83. Donate? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead, post the raw data, along with detailed notes including any pending progress, and let netizens hack the data.

    Hackers have WAY more time than money to spare.

    1. Re:Donate? Why? by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      Yep, that is the way. Just make the data publicly aviable, and the rest will sort itself out

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  84. Reading old tapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    readtapes.com

    A little-known company in Canada that has very
    high success rates on ancient 1/2" tapes.

  85. A few high-level line item amounts would be nice. by lildogie · · Score: 1

    So, how much just to save the data from destruction and put it on the 'net?

    The eminient "celestial mechanicians" can then decide whether they want to see the data on their own nickel.

  86. Well I did my part by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    I didn't donate because I at least like something in return for my money, but I did give them $20 for a one-year membership (student discount). Hopefully some of my money will go towards this essential mission. I've long thought about joining the Planetary Society; this was my final impetus to do it.

  87. Another use for the money by slapout · · Score: 1

    about $250,000 ... There are no serious proposals to send any more spin-stabilized spacecraft on solar escape trajectories any time in the near future

    What about using $250,000 to send another spacecraft out to investigate?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Another use for the money by PapaBoojum · · Score: 1

      What about using $250,000 to send another spacecraft out to investigate?

      If you know of a way to build such an experimental vehicle, launch it and monitor it for $250K, ~please~ call NASA (seriously).

  88. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by FredGray · · Score: 1

    Incidentally, this is one reason why it's extremely important to fund university groups even in the era of "big science." An environment where intellectual curiosity is expected and rewarded will be more cost-effective than a mega-contractor with a "what's your account number" mentality every time. Written as a university postdoc in physics...

  89. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by dodongo · · Score: 1

    Surely then you appreciate the irony in the mass of paperwork that comes with completing a PO.

    If I hear "This is Form 23B in duplicate, but I need Form 23C in triplicate" from a clerk sitting right next to a goddamn copy machine *one* *more* *time*... :)

  90. Re:Funding TP by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    lol! Yeah, I know, I was _trying_ to be funny. Guess Monday isn't my day to be funny. Come to think on it, any day ending in Y probably isn't my day for being funny '-)

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  91. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by FredGray · · Score: 1

    Sure, there are obstinate bureaucrats in most any organization. I don't know how it is at Purdue, but the University of California has a procurement credit card system that basically eliminates POs for anything under $2500. We just order it and reconcile the paperwork later.

  92. Re:I can help - RTFA please by Skjellifetti · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have an 8-track deck in my Charger...

    Will you please RTFA. It clearly says 7 and 9 track tapes.

    But statistically speaking, it ought to work on average.

  93. Is this possible? by Commradd · · Score: 1

    So NASA's 16.5 Billion Dollar budget this year wasn't enough to cover the overwhelming $250,000 tape backup scheme that they had already prophetized for years?

  94. rely on stupidty for funding... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Well Duh.

    Don't be clear. Just put out popup and flash ads all over the web: "We're going to lose all sorts of classic 1970s Eros unless you contribute! Click to save the Eros data"

    You'll get $1 million just from people who think they are saving classic pr0n collections.

    --
    -Styopa
  95. Have NASA donate the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't they ask NASA to donate the computer to them instead of scraping it?

  96. Pioneer Anomaly Explained by RNG · · Score: 1

    This guy here has the answer :-)

    Not only does he explain the Pioneer anomaly but also proposes a radically different explanation for just about every physical phenomenon. I doubt wether there's anything to his claims, but then again, 500 years ago we were sure that the Earth was the center of the universe. If nothing else his theory seems quite consistent (if you can bring yourself to accept the underlying premise).

    1. Re:Pioneer Anomaly Explained by Ranger · · Score: 1

      This guy is self-published. I can see why you put the smiley. Universal Publishers is a self publishing house like PublishAmerica.

      This makes me suspicious. I did a google search and found that this guy has no credetentials. So I'd have to view his theory with great skepticism. I'm not going to shell out $30 to find out. And neither is this guy.

      --
      "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  97. Re:Funding TP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So are you suggesting that the military go for one day without wiping their asses in Iraq so we can save this data? A messy proposition in the least.

  98. Hm, no really who cares... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Can't the tapes be put onto a different format, say DVD's...or backed up to triple redundant hard drives. I would MUCH rather have to access a fast SCSI drive then reels of tape.

    Ok, now for those who say "but the vinal sounds so much better then that digital crap"...why are they bothering to dismantle this ancient computer? Why not just leave it in a warehouse or just donate to some organization (like this one) who can then play with the data? Come on, it is not like they will really use the parts on newer computers. To take it apart is a waste of money (unless it has national security components, which at this age, I doubt).

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:Hm, no really who cares... by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      True, but there are two problems.

      1. If they destroy this machine, someone will have to create a new device to read those tapes accurately, so that they can be transfered to another media.

      2. Someone will have to do those transfers, which adds money and time to the project.

    2. Re:Hm, no really who cares... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      I would rather see a front-load cost then back-end. If they transfer the data, now, to a current format they can put this raw data on the net and let the world have at it. These guys seem to be proposing to convert the data, study the data, release the data....that middle-step is adding cost and delaying the information release. I would rather they ask for money to convert the data to a new format and release it to the public. That would be just fine and dandy- and would not cost anywhere near 250k.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  99. we suck by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1

    Isn't technology wonderful, we can see pictures in caves from thousand of years ago and read books which have been written some centuries ago, but all our technology isn't capable of doing something better

    I guess the best option is to re-record it, ej: store it periodically in the trendy medium people uses in a given decade, that'd be DVD for today.

    1. Re:we suck by susano_otter · · Score: 1

      Actually, the real reason we suck is because in all these thousands of years, we still haven't figured out how to beam those cave paintings psychically into every schoolchild's mind, so they can apprehend the paintings directly without having to travel to the physical site itself.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  100. O.K lets do the math by truckaxle · · Score: 1

    Estimate 150000 US soldiers and support personel.

    Further estimate average of the need for TP once per day per person and an average 20 usages per TP roll.

    TP_rolls = 150000 / 20 = 7500

    Figure in a conservative typical military waste of 25% and loss to enemy capture...

    TP_rolls = 7500 * 1.25 = 9375

    Realizing that Haliburton probably has the contract for TP in Iraq and this is to the military and this TP has to be delivered to dangerous areas so a reasonable fully burdened rate of $25 per roll

    TP_cost = 9375 * $25 = $234375

    Wow! Very good for a WAG eh?

  101. Simple: Gravity and Mass affect speed of light by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Because there is more mass towards the center of the solar system, the slower light (things with waves and particles) and matter (items with mass) move about.

    As you move further away from all the mass, time distorts and you actually speed up as observed from earth. If you were on the spacecraft, you would observe everything else in the solor system slowing down. (I think?)

    In theory, one might be able to traverse to other solar systems faster than we originally thought, but still takes more time than we have as humans with current technology.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Simple: Gravity and Mass affect speed of light by ShoobieRat · · Score: 1

      Far more knowledgable and dedicated scientists have had knowledge of time distortion and the data on the tapes, than we. I'm sure they would have put 2 and 2 together long ago on that. (And if not them, one of the amatures following this stuff.)

      The 'Dark Energy/Dark-Matter' issue is, I believe, a fruitless claim. It merely arises in this issue because it is a hot topic in the astronomy/physics world today.

      More likely these "behaviors" are caused by a faulty unit on the spacecraft that was present in each craft and thus all have experienced similar malfunctions.

  102. Harware Hacking by dosboss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's a project for ya:

    - Go to eBay and buy one. (wait for the DRMO auction for the 7-track unit)
    - Build a box to acess the drive - not real hard for a good hardware hacker
    - build a Linux driver to access it (presuming no driver exists already for the card you connect it to)
    - get the tapes via FOIA

    Conclusion: get the data for next to nothing.

    Oh, yeah, one last step:

    - ship the 245,000 smackers you didn't use to my house, in .9999 gold coins please.

    1. Re:Harware Hacking by Detritus · · Score: 1

      The last 7-track tape drive that I saw at NASA required a motor-generator unit for power, plus it used an I/O channel that was designed in the late 1950s.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  103. Re:Funding TP by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Really? Peter Pan makes me shit like a fairy.

    That's because you are a fairy.

  104. (Eyeroll) C'mon - the solution is obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Splice the 9-track tapes lengthwise alongside the 7-track tapes and cut them again so they are (can you see this coming?) 8 tracks each. Then go to an old electronics surplus store and buy a couple of used 8-track tape players - there were a zillion made in the day.

    Jeez, in the digital age people seem to have forgotten how to solve the simplest problems.

  105. Modified Newtonian dynamics by Wonko42 · · Score: 1
    I'm no physicist, but has anyone with access to the data considered that this could be nothing more than modified Newtonian dynamics in effect? The theory (which, among other things, provides an alternative explanation to the dark matter theory) proposes that Newton's second law of motion is inaccurate for objects undergoing very little acceleration (see the Wikipedia article for a more thorough explanation).

    Within the solar system, the effect isn't observable due to the acceleration caused by the sun's gravitational pull, but the Pioneer probes may be far enough from the sun's gravitational influence that the low-acceleration dynamics proposed by MOND could be in effect.

    From what I've read, I'm not entirely convinced that MOND would have as large of an effect on the probes as has been observed, but has anyone actually crunched the numbers? They've already theorized that dark matter could be responsible, but I'd be very interested in seeing whether MOND could provide a more reasonable (and less astonishing) explanation.

    1. Re:Modified Newtonian dynamics by Wonko42 · · Score: 1

      I've answered my own question: MOND has indeed been considered as a possible explanation for the Pioneer anomaly, as described on page 44 of Study of the anomalous acceleration of Pionieer 10 and 11 . According to the authors, the anomalous acceleration is too large to be explained by MOND or similar theories.

  106. Old drives aren't _that_ hard to find... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nine track tapes were an industry standard for a LONG time. Finding drives to read them isn't that big a deal. I've got about six of them. One of which is connected to a Linux box right here, for the purpose of writing boot tapes for my PDP-11. SCSI MO drives aren't hard to find either. I've got several, and they turn up often. There are lots of people out there in the computer collecting community with VAXen and MO drives and tape drives of all sorts. I hear often of people that can't find a machine "anywhere" to read their old data. They apparently don't look too hard. There are several mailing lists and newsgroups of computer collectors, and it wouldn't be hard to find someone to help you recover your data. Us computer collectors love to have someone _else_ think that our hardware is useful.

    And, if NASA is getting rid of an archaic machine and drives - someone should save it! There are LOTS of collectors out there, lots of hardware hackers and geeks like myself that love working on old machines, and could keep the machine operational and help transfer data.

    In other words, yes, there is still a way to get data read in, even if you're sure that the media is too obsolete that nobody has a working drive. Nine track tapes, Magneto Optical, 8" floppies, Bernoulli cartridges, TK50 CompacTapes, QIC cartridges, MFM hard drives, SyQuest cartridges, paper tape, punched cards... The hardware is piled up all over the place, in the basements and bedrooms of people like me. Wether it's as common as a Commodore 64 5 1/4" floppy or as exotic as an Exatron Stringy Floppy or a 1600BPI nine track tape, chances are you can find someone with the machine and willing to help you.

  107. pioneer data all available online by intelsquirrel · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here are some links published on another group about this same topic, and all data that NASA knows about is already saved.

    > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog? sc=1972-012A&ds=*
    > http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog? sc=1973-019A&ds=*

    >Well, well, well...it looks like every bit of Pioneer 10 and 11 has been saved already, and can be accessed thru the proper channels (on tape, but apparently they will burn a CDROM on request).

  108. Mono? Bzzt - you're wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >With genuine mono sound!?

    8-tracks were always stereo.

    They were originally sonically slightly superior to cassettes (IIRC the recorded track was wider and their speed was 3 3/4 in/sec. vs. the cassette's 1 7/8 in/sec.), but cassette improvements quickly eliminated that edge. They were more than twice the size and mechanically highly inferior to cassettes.

    They were a US home-grown and mechanically dumb nightmare alternative to the more elegant Philips (Dutch) cassette tape. It was a single loop of tape that pulled tape from the inside of the loop and wound it on the outside. The recording industry preferred them to cassettes because they didn't last as long (so they sold more replacements). They jammed often - in the 70's, it was not at all unusual to see 100's of feet of tape strewn over the highway-side because an 8-track had jammed and broken the tape, so Bo and Luke just tossed it out the window. Good riddance to bad technology.

    1. Re:Mono? Bzzt - you're wrong by dryeo · · Score: 1

      8-tracks were always stereo.
      Actually some were quad. I remember a friend having a quad version of Dark Side of the Moon on 8 track. Sounded excellent.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  109. I'm no physics intellect buuuut... by thespace101 · · Score: 1

    Pardon me, I'm no physics intellect but you're hurling a piece of metal through space at super crazy distances and velocities in unexplored areas of space. You come to tell me that you're trying to figure out an anomoly that happened in deep space? Millions of miles away? Hey, it doesn't take a genius to know that there's a gafricknzillion objects hurling around your little satellite whipping it all over the place, its amazing it stays on your little dotted lines as much as it does to begin with. Why don't you all check to see if the satellite passed through another object's path and time was bending there enough to change the satellite's course.

    1. Re:I'm no physics intellect buuuut... by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Wow holy fucking shit you cracked it! Hundreds of physicists are left scratching thier heads but your stupendous intellect came through! 'tard.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
  110. Re:Funding TP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naw, a 4 star general only earns like 400k per year. That means that each asswipe only costs the tax payers about 1k per day.

  111. Newtons third law by Dollyknot · · Score: 1
    I think Newtons third law does not make sense in a non eucldian universe.

    Every action has equal and opposite reaction does not make sense in a non euclidian universe because the equal and opposite reaction is not in a straight line, ie it is curved, part of a circle. therefore comes back on itself, therefore is not opposite.

    I think the best bet is the mobius strip and the Klein bottle.

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  112. Pssht. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    It's only ironic if you can't tell the difference between a careless mistake and intentional ass-hatted stupidity.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  113. Re:Funding TP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Asswipe funds War in Iraq!

    Oh wait, it's the same here...

  114. Imperial and Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if NASA just screwed up inches and millimeters and that is why the craft was inexplicably off course? Oh, that was the Mars probe problem....

  115. Doc by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

    The way I see it, if you're gonna build a time machine into a car why not do it with some style. Besides, the stainless, steel construction made the flux dispersal--look out!

  116. Pretty much exactly it. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    That seemed to be exactly the case, judging by the release. So it's probably more likely that this foundation wants to froth up the Slashdot crowd into donating madly. I mean, no organization could actually be that stupid. It defies belief.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  117. What the crap is that? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of a current-loop TTY interface. Can you tell me what the heck that is?

    Though Google tells me it may be a solved problem.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:What the crap is that? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      That's what they used back in Ye Olden Dayse. Basically, you had all your devices chained together on a wire, and ran a current (20-50mA) through it to represent ones and interrupted it for zeroes. ISTR the max speed was ~110 baud, but I really don't know. It was popular because it was pretty noise-tolerant, and required little circuitry to implement. And yes, translation between current-loop and RS-232 interfaces is a done deal.

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    2. Re: What the crap is that? by gidds · · Score: 1
      Not just in Ye Olden Days, either. MIDI still runs on a current loop to this day. And at only 31 kbaud, too.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  118. Re:I can help - RTFA please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Will you please RTFA. It clearly says 7 and 9 track tapes."

    What I don't understad is the NASA still has serviceable parts able to read those tapes. Why then they just move the tapes to another support?

    And then, if those boxes are going to be decomissioned why that charity needs the money? They can just ask NASA to give the boxes and the tapes to them so they can read it!

  119. Re:Nice to see "poring" spelled correctly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh dude, left wingers disagree with you on a frequent basis

    There is left, right, and just "way out there". You're about five lightyears away from the left wing.

    Of course, a complaint about a spelling error is obviously 1) on topic to the Pioneer anomoly and 2) would be the subject of left/right political debate. Not everything is a political debate. Perchance did you ever think your attitude and your paranoia might be what contributes to negative attitudes towards your comments here? Of course not, because anyone who disagrees with you is part of some big conspiracy.

    I know you don't have the balls to reply, so its at least fun to sit here and taunt idiots like you who don't understand even basic rules of debate or concepts of logic.

  120. Re: tape baking by gclef · · Score: 1

    hmmm...I was seeing this with 80's vintage Ampex stuff as well, so I don't think it's limited to Maxwell, but point taken...it does vary greatly with the materials used in the tape.

  121. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by dodongo · · Score: 1

    *sigh* We *do* have a credit card system, but it's only for tax-exempt purchases from local brick-and-mortar businesses (i.e., can't order online) for purchases under $500.

    And that's only if we submit approval paperwork beforehand.

    Color me envious!

  122. Planetary Society is not serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its members are entreteiners like Spielberg and Bill Nye The Science Guy, not real scientists. Dont waste your money, they will use the donations to make a SciFi movie or something.

  123. Not -that- rare. by Banner · · Score: 1

    I've been to the NASA office that holds these machines. They're just old DEC tape drives and DEC PDP's. They are by no means 'rare' though I will admit they're harder to find then they used to be.

    Why this data hasn't been transfered to a different medium for easier access and storage? Funding and Politics I'd suspect, the two biggest banes of NASA these days.

  124. From a cursory look at the donations page... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1


    ... it doesn't seem that donations are earmarked for this particular cause.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  125. Masterplan by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    - unveil the mystery of the pioneer anomaly
    - build anti-anti-anti-anti-gravity device
    - place device in orbit and point at Earth
    - blow Earth to pieces, creating another Asteroid belt
    - profit!
    - Ow, wait ..

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  126. so - start moving the data to better storage media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much data are we talking about? Are the programmers still around to code up the utilities necessary for reading the data and saving it to more modern mass storage devices.

    Obviously the hardware is grossly outdated. But this data should be preserved. Obviously this is going to cost something, but I suspect that data is invaluable

  127. Re:This is typical of Govt funded thought processe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course you got axed, recovery of the test data after failure was going to be an additional contract for the firm. By having constructed such on your own time, you cost the company revenue.

  128. Re:I can help - RTFA please by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    No, its far too many tracks. We need a one track tape reader, because 1001 AND 0111 is 0001.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  129. 7 Track Tapes by RagingChipmunk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    After reading TFA its not clear if the original data is in analog format or digital. It seems that most readers assume its digital format, and thats what I was assuming too. If it were purely digital, then transferring the data to a new format would be a reasonably easy migration.

    I suspect its in analog format - probably the original signal recordings. Which would make more sense for the expense of analyzing it - because you would be very interested in the phase relationships between different channels of data and their doppler shifts. Its the analog waveforms that could give insights into the timing effects over long distances.

    --
    The only PT Boat Journal on the web: http://www.PT171.org
  130. How much?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $250,000 to read and archive 7 tapes! I guess they're charging NASA contractor rates. Sheesh and people wonder why we haven't been back to the moon in decades.

  131. Re:Antimatterfuel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only 30 zarbos? Darn, and I just filled up for 37.2 zarbos!

  132. Distributed by litclicker · · Score: 1

    Instead of asking for all this money why don't they have they data examined similar to seti.

    --
    what if there were no hypothetical questions?
  133. ATTENTION PEOPLE OF EARTH - IT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE by Riot+Nrrrrd · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the caps, but I wanted to get your attention ;)

    I work at JPL, for the last 12 1/2 years in the Multi-mission Image Processing Lab. A co-worker in my group two doors down from me did some work on Pioneer 7-track tape data recovery a few years ago; the main interest at that time was actual Science data, rather than the raw spacecraft Telemetry data that seems to be the focus of this Planetary Society inquest.

    A lot of the tapes were recovered back then. They were burned to CD-ROMs and 4 copies of each were made. One set is still here at JPL at the Regional Planetary Image Facility (see http://rpif.jpl.nasa.gov/locb_mission.asp?pioneerv enusorbiter - they've got some Pioneer data), one set is in the hands of the organization that was the precursor to our current Planetary Data System (PDS) - the NASA archiving organization (they create CD-ROMs and nowadays DVD-ROMs from mission data, if we own it). Go check out http://pds.jpl.nasa.gov/. I think the original researcher got copy #4, and I've forgotten who got copy #3. If we could find one of the CD-ROMs, we could look at the index file (each CD had an index file; it was updated as newer versions of the CD's were produced) and see if any of the files contained Telemetry data.

    As for the equipment, I think the PS is blowing smoke - as far as we know, Ratheon has the old VAX equipment we used to read those old 7-track tapes onto, and I suspect they might also have the actual 7-track tape drives themselves that were used in the reclamation project (i.e. by my co-worker).

    Anyway, the key thing is, the main thrust of this recovery project was to recover Science data, not Telemetry. So if someone really wants all the Telemetry from launch up to 2002 (last transmission received), they'll probably still need to get it off of those old rotting 7-track tapes. We probably only have some of it on the CD-ROMs that were made from the efforts here.

    --
    .signature? Why, I haven't heard that word since before the Clone Wars ...
  134. One comment: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Data are plural!

    1. Re:One comment: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data's

  135. speaking of Maxell by calculadoru · · Score: 1

    I'm so glad someone mentioned Maxell - I used to buy CD-R spindles made by those guys (because they were cheap, and I was a student), burnt about 200 CD's worth of MP3's, then after a year I noticed with growing horror the aluminium film was beginning to peel off of the discs. I lost about twenty CD's before I could copy my music onto Tayo Yuden media. Maxell discs - one shudders to think of them, bad craziness.

    --
    The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. -- G.B. Shaw
    1. Re:speaking of Maxell by ryanov · · Score: 1

      And yet, IMO, they always made the best floppies.

  136. Those old tapes may already be unreadable by DrTime · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked for the Lunar & Planetary Lab many years ago when we recieved hundreds of such tapes from Pioneer. At the time they were stored in racks in the computer room with an IBM 1130 system. Track density in those days was either 556 bpi or 800 bpi on 1 inch tape (memory) and recording technology was crude at best. Even then the fear was that the data would be irrecoverable in years. At the time, the lab was run by Dr. Sonnett who credited with the discovery that CMOS circuits were static sensitive. He came up with idea of grounding workers. This paved the way for low power electonics on some of these payloads. They were interesting days.

  137. The wider perspective by CowboyRobot · · Score: 1

    This story shows how ephemeral digital data are. I applied for a business license today, and while waiting, browsed through the collection of licenses issued during the 1890s. These are obsolete documents recorded on ancient technology, yet well-preserved and easily stored. Any information not recorded on paper cannot be considered truly preserved.

    --
    every stain tells a story
  138. Fudge by mrs+dogbreath · · Score: 1

    I clicked the donation link but the site appears to have been slashdotted, will try again later

    A fool and his money are easily parted

  139. 250,000 to read a few tapes?!? by ecloud · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't NASA just burn some CDs with all this data before they get rid of the computer?

  140. tapes by damicha · · Score: 0

    good, I love it!

    junk the old tape readres for goot! NALA
    (with the emphasis on 'national', because ESA will continue to be able to read my tapes.....)

    I do have copies of my scientific work on 9 tracks.
    They are still good (retensioned regularly, read/write verified per blcck, etc.).

    I'll be glad to buy their tape stations......

    Oh, it was first mvs, then vms, now it has been SuSE Linux on an IBM S350 (actually, and Amdahl compatible...) to take care of them.
    Aluminum complicated superconductivity within a matrix, who would want that anyways......

  141. freedom of information act by mycall · · Score: 1

    Couldn't this data be freed by the courts?

  142. How about a BOINC project? by matt2004 · · Score: 1

    Throw 20,000 idle computer processors at it...

    BOINC

  143. Re: ATTENTION PEOPLE OF EARTH - ALREADY BEEN DONE by Riot+Nrrrrd · · Score: 1

    I wrote:

    A co-worker in my group two doors down from me did some work on Pioneer 7-track tape data recovery a few years ago; the main interest at that time was actual Science data, rather than the raw spacecraft Telemetry data that seems to be the focus of this Planetary Society inquest.

    And, in fact, I believe the data referenced on this page:

    http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/database/MasterCatalog? ds=PSFP-00166

    is from that very same task that my co-worker participated in.

    --
    .signature? Why, I haven't heard that word since before the Clone Wars ...
  144. MOND does explain the anamoly. by anandsr · · Score: 1

    MOND does explain the anamoly, but the paper rejects it because such a force is not felt in the orbits of Earth and Mars. Although MOND specifically says that it only applies when acceleration due to a field approaches a0. Which it does at these distances but not at Earth and Mars distances.

    I understand that MOND is not a theory it is just an observation that applies to Galactic distances very well. I also believe that any theory that does not incorporate MOND in some form is missing something very critical.

    My simple reason is that an equation that fits observation so well as MOND does to the Galactic distances must be a good approximation of some under lying theory. Dark Matter does not cut it, it is very ad-hoc, it would be believable if MOND did not predict things so well.

    I do believe that MOND is not completely correct its like Keplers equations were to Newtons theory. It has some grains of truth. It may also not apply very well to Cosmic distances which the theory that explains MOND may explain more correctly.

    I think Mannheim's Conformal Gravity does explain somethings of MOND very well, but I don't say that I understand it. It also fails miserably at Gravitational Lensing. But this is the only theory that does explain MOND.

    The TeVaS is just an extension of MOND and I would n't put too much money in it. It doesn't explain MOND, and only merges MOND with Relativity. That is not good enough.

  145. Re:AHA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FWIW, I was trying for Funny. I can understand calling it Flamebait, but Overrated? That's just cowardly and wrong.

  146. Re: Antimatter Deposits by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    The antimatter deposits reside in naturally-occurring magnetic pressor-beam bottles, which keep the matter out, and the antimatter in.
    (A pressor beam is the opposite of a tractor beam, in that it "presses" matter (and antimatter) away, rather than "tractoring" it in.)
    The mutual annihilation caused by the stray atom of matter or antimatter that occasionally crosses the boundary creates enough energy to make the bottles self-sustaining.
    The aliens (who are made of conventional matter) mine the antimatter by distorting the shape of the bottles (using energy) so that they "fracture" into smaller-sized bottles, which are more easily handled (or, occasionally, antimatter fields are found that already have bottles of the appropriate size).
    The bottles make the antimatter relatively easy to transport, so the antimatter is left in the bottles until it is needed.

    Yeah, that's it.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  147. Re: Antimatter Deposits by GodGell · · Score: 1

    so you're saying at the "beginning of universe", when matter and antimatter were both very common in this galaxy, instead of all antimatter starting a reaction with matter, some unknown energy kept antimatter in deposits, and apparently that unknown energy even had some intelligence to it, while sometimes letting a few atoms into the antimatter, and the energy sustains itself using 2 or 4 atoms worth of gamma rays (1 atom + 1 antimatter atom usually creates about 512 electron volts of gamma rays), and the aliens can easily change the direction of this energy... hmmmmm.

    you expect me to believe that? :D (of course you don't, but let's assume...)

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
  148. Re: Antimatter Deposits by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Not so much "intelligence" as a kind of natural equilibrium, with quantum mechanics allowing the occasional tunneling.
    As to the credibility of this explanation, I'm going to say that it's probably sufficient for Star Trek, and leave it at that.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  149. Re: Antimatter Deposits by GodGell · · Score: 1

    it's more than safe to say startrek is helplessly unrealistic. :)

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
  150. Re: Antimatter Deposits by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Whereas claiming that 1 zarbo = 326 666 666 666 666 666 dollars is the very epitome of reality.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  151. Re: Antimatter Deposits by GodGell · · Score: 1

    Whereas claiming that 1 zarbo = 326 666 666 666 666 666 dollars is the very epitome of reality.

    and so is claiming that it isn't.

    --
    [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10