Slashdot Mirror


Amazon to Enter the Online DVD Rental Business

ChrisF79 writes "Wired News is reporting that Amazon.com is hiring programmers to work with online dvd rentals. From the article: "Advertising for positions based at the company's Seattle headquarters, the listings seek engineers to help in 'building systems and algorithms that must move inventory between our fulfillment centers and our customers in a way that gives customers exactly what they want, when they want it.' The postings indicate they are specifically for an online DVD rental service." Netflix seems to have a stronghold on the market so despite numerous advantages for Amazon, especially economies of scale, can Amazon enter the market and surpass Netflix?"

243 comments

  1. Advantage: Amazon by jmp_nyc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Amazon has the clear advantage here. They already operate distribution centers in several locations around the US, have experience in inventory management and quick shipping, and can even rent videos at a slight loss for a while, using it to drive business to the rest of their operations.

    Of course, if all that fails, they can follow their usual MO and file a patent for the idea of unlimited online rentals for a monthly fee and drive Netflix out of business that way.
    -JMP

    1. Re:Advantage: Amazon by leonmergen · · Score: 1

      Amazon has the clear advantage here. They already operate distribution centers in several locations around the US, have experience in inventory management and quick shipping, and can even rent videos at a slight loss for a while, using it to drive business to the rest of their operations.

      Well, it will be interresting to see how they actually think to manage all those rentals. If you see what they charge for shipping packages right now, and assume it cannot really get much lower, the actual delivery of a package costs pretty much.

      I don't think it's very likely this whole idea will succeed if the shipping fees aren't close to free, so I am really interrested in the solution they will come up with to deal with those problems...

      --
      - Leon Mergen
      http://www.solatis.com
    2. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Cerdic · · Score: 3, Informative

      WalMart also had those advantages over Netflix, but look at what happened. They stopped taking new subscriptions (because they intend to stop the service) not too long ago.

      --
      Advice for my fellow geeks: before seeking out that threesome you dream of, you might see what a TWOsome is like first.
    3. Re:Advantage: Amazon by bedroll · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Netflix needs better competition anyway. Blockbuster competes on price and that they give in-store rentals, but they don't compete on service.

      A co-worker recently did a trial comparison of the two services. He found that Netflix sent, received, and processed faster. Also, he found the entire sign up process easier with Netflix (mostly due to an error Blockbuster's site experienced with his sign up, which could be a one time issue). Their website is better designed. Basically, they're just a better online service than Blockbuster has been.

      Amazon has proven to be a good online service. My personal experience shows that there's rarely ever need to use anything but super-saver shipping because most things get to me just that quick. Their website works: I can find stuff, I can buy stuff.

      If anyone can compete with Netflix it's them, hopefully this will either force Netflix to continue to improve or lower their prices. That means that I win. If nothing else, they probably won't raise prices or worsen service, so I at least won't lose.

    4. Re:Advantage: Amazon by joebok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know if they have a "clear advantage" - NetFlix has a lot of name recognition and customer loyalty. My experience has been great, as have the experiences of everyone I know - very easy to use and excellent customer service. "NetFlix" is practically synonomous with "on-line DVD rental".

      A contender has a lot to accomplish to get to that level I think.

    5. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1

      It's a different package than they typically deliver right now; a book or CD comes in a cardboard box, often with packing bubbles and such.

      If they follow the Netflix model, the DVD will be shipped in an envelope such that the whole package weighs less than an ounce - disc only, no case. It's their product, so they can risk them getting broken at virtually no cost (distributors probably replace them for free). First-class, non-bulk postage using USPS for a square envelope 1oz is around 50c. You can imagine that they get a pretty good bulk discount on shipping, and assuredly won't use USPS.

      Also, these subscription models depend on the fact that a large number of people won't use it very often. If even a small percentage of the subscribership pays the $10/month and average one rental every 1.5 months, the service's profit margin goes through the roof.

    6. Re:Advantage: Amazon by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      Ah, but it can get lower. If you are sending out large amounts of mail, i.e. bulk mail, you can get much cheaper rates through the USPS. Plus, and I'm not sure if you're an online DVD renter, they are just sending a little flat envelope.

      I'm all for competition, but I think Amazon will have to have a special gimmick of some sort to enter into the US market with any success.

      And for all Netflix users out there, my Queue Manager program is now officially free, and officially version 1. Now that it's out of beta, come give it a spin!

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    7. Re:Advantage: Amazon by ObjetDart · · Score: 1
      Amazon has the clear advantage here. They already operate distribution centers in several locations around the US, have experience in inventory management and quick shipping, and can even rent videos at a slight loss for a while, using it to drive business to the rest of their operations.

      I don't think the advantage is so clear...Netflix has all that stuff too, and has already been in the business for a long, long time (in Internet time, anyway.) Walmart already went head-to-head with Netflix for a while and eventually gave up.

      I've been a long time constomer of both Netflix and Amazon. I think both are good companies. I think the Netflix price is very reasonable (we don't have cable or broadcast TV, so we watch a lot of movies; our per-movie cost winds up being around $1 - $1.50). I just don't see what Amazon could offer that would be so much better than Netflix that I would want to switch.

      --
      I read Usenet for the articles.
    8. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Foz · · Score: 1
      And for all Netflix users out there, my Queue Manager program is now officially free, and officially version 1. Now that it's out of beta, come give it a spin!


      Too bad it's for windows. How about a mac/linux port?

      -- Gary F.
    9. Re:Advantage: Amazon by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You could argue they had the same advantage over eBay. I'm surprised however how few people even realise that Amazon operates an auction service, and there seem to be many amongst my friends unaware of their (separate) Amazon Marketplace service that also, in practice, ends up competing with eBay.

      In practice, people generally think "Amazon = books", and "eBay = secondhand goods". Right now, people think "Netflix = online DVD rentals". I don't doubt Amazon can probably make their service profitable, but Netflix is an established brand, and Amazon's "brand" brings less to the table in this case than it did with Amazon Marketplace, let alone Amazon Auctions.

      As for the last comment, if Netflix doesn't copy Amazon and continues to do what it's always done, and are not currently violating any Amazon patents, they have nothing to fear from Amazon patenting anything. They'll always be their own example of prior art.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Advantage: Amazon by rahlquist · · Score: 1

      That sounds great but then why hasnt anyone else been successful at it yet? Like WalMart?

      --
      Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
    11. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If even a small percentage of the subscribership pays the $10/month and average one rental every 1.5 months, the service's profit margin goes through the roof.

      1.5 rentals a month - Are you jokeing? What statistics do you have to provide this claim as an average. For me I use blockbuster's 3 at a time and I got something like 17 last month.

    12. Re:Advantage: Amazon by rpdillon · · Score: 1

      Looks really nice! I second the above post: I only use Mac and Linux in my home. This would make my list for sure if it ran on those platforms! Any chance for a port?

    13. Re:Advantage: Amazon by dpille · · Score: 1

      WalMart dropping their DVD rental service isn't surprising- most of their cutthroat and successful business practices center on inventory. WalMart would need to make a huge killing in the DVD rental service market before the investment would pay off better than the same amount put toward more retail dominance.

      I'd like to see Amazon call in used dvd's- you get a little labeled sleeve, if they like the quality they add a week to your subscription.

    14. Re:Advantage: Amazon by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      I used Wal*Mart for this same service, and I was surprised when they quit.

      Wal*Mart started out being the cheapest, then forced everyone else to follow them into the low-priced space. Then Wal*Mart dropped the service, presumably because they weren't making any money. Will the other services keep the same prices?

      Maybe Wal*Mart couldn't make money because the USPS can't rely on foreign labor. (Yes, I know, most carriers aren't too far from being foreign- but they still get paid American wages.)

      But to the grand-grand parent who said that Amazon has an advantage because they have distribution centers already...

      Don't you think Netflix has those too? It's not like both of them are coming out of the gate at the same time.

      Frankly, I would base my decision on whoever uses the smallest envelopes. Gamefly uses envelopes that are *just barely* too big to fit in the outgoing slot in our mailbox (one of those 'neighborhood' things that sits on a pole and has like 20 small boxes). So I had to drive around to find a bigger box.

      Seems like a small thing, but that is why I dropped Gamefly...the convenience of at home delivery really went down when I had to travel somewhere else just to return them.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    15. Re:Advantage: Amazon by scsscs · · Score: 1

      Netflix is the one with the patent in this case: Method and apparatus for renting items

    16. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix uses pop-up ads. Amazon does not. Discussion over.

    17. Re:Advantage: Amazon by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Frankly, I would base my decision on whoever uses the smallest envelopes. Gamefly uses envelopes that are *just barely* too big to fit in the outgoing slot in our mailbox (one of those 'neighborhood' things that sits on a pole and has like 20 small boxes). So I had to drive around to find a bigger box."

      I guess I don't understand this argument...do you never leave the house to go to work, buy groceries..etc.? There are tons of US mailboxes out there in the town...I always just drop my stuff in the drive by mail boxes on the way to work in the mornings when I have mail to send...

      Doing it that way is not like having to make a special trip to just send mail....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:Advantage: Amazon by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "1.5 rentals a month - Are you jokeing? What statistics do you have to provide this claim as an average. For me I use blockbuster's 3 at a time and I got something like 17 last month."

      Nope...just depends, some times I go through as many movies as I can get a month...then others..well, put it this way. A little over a year ago...I had the same 3 movies out for a year..just never got around to watching them. Remembered them finally....watched them..and then started going through them as fast as netflix would send them.

      So, yes...I can easily believe that a large majority of the people don't watch the max number they can a month...

      Doing it this way is STILL cheaper to me I think in the long run. When I had to do the local DVD rentals...I got killed on late fees...I get busy, and forget to watch return them...and it adds up on you quickly.

      I am about set up now, tho...to be able to ge the movies in, rip them to the HD...and watch them at my leisure.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Advantage: Amazon by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Your co-worker needed to use Netflix for longer than the trial period to get a true feel for their speed. They throttle heavy users. I tend to return discs the day after I get them, and Netflix waits an extra day to ship me my next one.

    20. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless Amazon drives them out of business with below-cost pricing, then raises the prices afterwards.

      Then, you lose.

    21. Re:Advantage: Amazon by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I don't know if they have a "clear advantage" - NetFlix has a lot of name recognition and customer loyalty. My experience has been great, as have the experiences of everyone I know - very easy to use and excellent customer service. "NetFlix" is practically synonomous with "on-line DVD rental"."

      I agree...I love Netflix. I do wonder, however, if Amazon would get a little 'leg ahead' if they offered Adult titles...something that Netflix, for some reason, does not do. Maybe have it on a separate, higher priced tier...I figure first service to do this would make a killing...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Enzo+the+Baker · · Score: 2, Informative
      Blockbuster competes on price

      Not anymore. Blockbuster is raising their fee to $17.99 as of August 19. Unless Netflix is raising their rates and I haven't heard about it, they are now the same price.

      --
      I may twist orthodoxy to partly justify a tyrant. But I can easily make up a German philosophy to justify him entirely.
    23. Re:Advantage: Amazon by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      There are a few services that do this (DVD Avenue is one).

      NetFlix used to do adult titles, but stopped when they got support from Best Buy. I presume it was a term of the arrangement.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    24. Re:Advantage: Amazon by bedroll · · Score: 1
      I, and a few friends, have been using Netflix for a couple years now. I've heard of the throttling but never experienced it. I've gone through times when I watched a movie the night I got it every time, and times when I've gone a couple monthes without bothering to watch any movies. I can't say that I ever noticed a big difference.

      However, even if Netflix waits a day to process the movies that's still a four day turn around. During his trial at Blockbuster's service he noticed no less than a five day turn around. It's still one day better.

    25. Re:Advantage: Amazon by prell · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, Netflix is able to ship and receive quickly not necessarily because of local warehouses, but because they have distributed nodes, at least superficially in the form of P.O. Boxes, which makes it possible to deliver movies in a single day at what I can only assume is a low price.

      Amazon may or may not have the ability to get things to you in a day at a reasonable cost. That's not to say that they can't develop this ability. However, it seems like they'd have to develop a close relationship with USPS, and perhaps that will irk their current shipping partner(s)? Then again, maybe Amazon is powerful enough to compel their current shipping partner(s) to ship things in a day for a lower-than-normal rate. But this seems like it couldn't be as cheap (or even as feasible) as using P.O. Box nodes with the USPS, since the USPS is already built to deliver to every house on a daily basis.

      About stock: is Amazon currently able to turn all of its in-stock DVDs into rental DVDs? Assuming they have the legal privilege to do this: do they have the stock? These are questions I cannot answer because I don't have the knowledge, but I assume Amazon has to deal with them. And if their rental service is as popular as their selling service, they'll have to double their stock of DVDs, and they'll have to optimize this stock for location, because people who rent X-movie may not live in the same location as people who buy X-movie -- and X-movie has to be near the renter, or it won't get there quickly. And if the rental service is popular, does Amazon stand to lose money? I remember reading an article that said that even if all of AOL's customers switched to AOL Broadband, they'd still lose money, because dial-up access has a larger dividend for them. Will this be an issue for Amazon? If people in general start to rent rather than buy (similar to the dial-up=>broadband trend), perhaps it won't be, because that's simply where the market is going.

      Amazon does have another option, as far as I can tell: they could open up local CD-pressing centers which turn (rewritable/re-pressable?) DVDs into movies which they then send to you. This way, their stock is virtual, and will always respond to demand perfectly. And distribution is instantaneous: a disc image of a movie is sent across the net and pressed onto DVDs. There's no waiting for a movie to ship from across the country. And when a movie is no longer in demand, the disc is overwritten (or recycled). This could even be on-demand: imagine renting a movie on Amazon.com and having that trigger a DVD-write in some building 20 miles away, which, upon completion, triggers a shipment to your house that, 99% of the time, gets it to you the next day. Rent 1 movie, 2 movies, 10 movies, and you'll get them all in a day, with very little cost to Amazon, and little more movie piracy risk than Netflix is currently taking.

      Or, Amazon could be gearing up to do download rentals :-) But that isn't very appealing to me at the moment.

    26. Re:Advantage: Amazon by neonleonb · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't think Amazon can compete with anything on the topic of user interface. I recently set up a wedding registry on Amazon (yes, yes, I know they have evil patents, but...), and the user interface was hellish.

      Once you found something in one color, it was hard to find it in another color, or to find a set (of pans) broken down into individual items. And it was really hard to find just their sets of dishes. Then, half of them were out of stock. Really, I was not impressed.

    27. Re:Advantage: Amazon by StupidHelpDeskGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm doing the same thing right now, and Blockbuster is beating Netflix in service time. Your single expereince is probably not enough evidcence to judge the entire service.

    28. Re:Advantage: Amazon by javaxman · · Score: 2, Informative
      I haven't tried it, but a quick search reveals Netflix Freak which is your OS X version of the same app... of course, it's not free, just free-to-try, whatever that means... frankly, I don't find the web form that hard to use, but I also pretty well let my wife manage the thing. Which is OK, usually, because when she gets crap I don't want to watch, it means more time to play Vice City...

      There's also this spiffy-looking Dashflix dashboard thingy, which is only a viewer not an editor, but still neat... and free...

    29. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Penty · · Score: 1

      Actually Netflix has the atvantage here. They deliberately built their centers near USPS hubs, where Amazon built theirs in places with low building/taxes costs and near to UPS & FedEx hubs.

    30. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'm a little confused that people are challenging this model as if it's unproven; I don't know why WalMart didn't succeed, maybe they chased the wrong demographic for this sort of thing, but NetFlix has already proven it works:

      Netflix 2nd Quarter

      I'd say on-track for a $650mil year is pretty successful.

    31. Re:Advantage: Amazon by shokk · · Score: 1

      None of these beat Blockbuster's in-store deal with their monthly club. I can have 2 movies out at a time and pay $21 for the month. I walk in with the movie I'm returning, grab the new movie I want, hand them both to the clerk, and away I go with the new movie. Beat that for turn-around time. With my wife and the kids all watching different things, we have a new movie going in and out of the home every day, but I probably see a movie twice a week depending on what's been rented.

      Plus they are a few blocks from my home, so I can do it on the way to work, or on the way home, or whenever. =)

      Remembering back from when I did Netflix, their movie library was really great, but it sucked when they listed the movie as "long wait time".

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    32. Re:Advantage: Amazon by bedroll · · Score: 1
      I have a feeling it just depends on where you live as far as the shipping time. Although, Blockbuster seems to recognize movies as arriving and then wait until the next day to ship. Netflix normally ships the same day as the return (with the exception of any throttling that may happen).

      You're right though, you can't judge a service by one user's experience, or even a small number of experiences. You have to take broader statistics or at least a larger survey. Unfortunately, I don't know of one and don't have the means to perform one. That's why I shared my experiences and the experiences that I'm personally aware of. I don't think it reads as a broadly sweeping assessment that everyone should use. If it wasn't clear enough then I apologize.

      Also, my comments about Amazon being quick are certainly situational. I'm sure that not everyone gets most super saver items within the first few days. Even I have had instances where items were back ordered and took weeks to get there, though I didn't mention that because it wouldn't be important when dealing with a queue of movies.

      I still think that the two in store free rentals is a huge advantage of the blockbuster service. If people in my area had better turn-around times on the movie rentals then I'd probably switch services just to get that. Then again, the thought of standing in line to rent a movie seems kinda passe at this point.

    33. Re:Advantage: Amazon by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Well, here's your first "unpleasent experience" story, then. I got a gift subscription to NetFlix. It's paid for, and for one month. I have no desire to pay for the service, but it's interesting enough to try for the month. So, I go to redeem my gift subscription. There is no way to do that, except to give them my credit card information, etc, and agree to their two week trial as well as signing up for one of their plans. So, when my month's up, they'll just start billing me. I can't say up front "I want my service to stop when the gift is used up", and I can't say "my subscription is already paid for, you don't need payment information from me". So, my friend wasted the $30 or whatever it cost, 'cause I'm sure not buying stuff from NetFlix just to claim the gift. What a scam.

      BTW, if anyone wants to buy the month cert, I'll sell it for less than face value. At least it looks relatively simple to get a transfer code so someone else can use it...

    34. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Fat+Cow · · Score: 1

      Customers cost money to acquire - Netflix already has many customers.

      They are like a Netflix asset. Amazon will have to spend the money to catch up.

      --
      stay frosty and alert
    35. Re:Advantage: Amazon by shreak · · Score: 1

      I've been a Netflix user for years and never experienced "throttling". I return movies within a day or so typically. They opened a distribution center in a nearby city a while back (2 hrs away). They report my DVD received the day after I put it in the Mail and I get my movie the next day.

      Yes, that's a 2 day turnaround. Awesome.

      =Shreak

    36. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I've never used Netflix but have used Amazon for several years. If they start offering DVD rental, I'll likely try it, 'cause I'm comfortable with them.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    37. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 1

      The statistic is just a WAG (it would actually come out to ~.7 rentals/month, btw). I was just illustrating that certainly the Netflix - and Amazon for that matter - executives have a business plan that builds in this kind of estimate.

      And, as embarrassed as I am to admit it, I subscribe to Netflix and sometimes go a month or two w/o renting anything new (hey, nice weather in Ohio is hard to come by, you have to enjoy it while it's here).

    38. Re:Advantage: Amazon by IronChef · · Score: 1

      My distribution center is an hour away and it still takes 4 days to get a new movie.

      Day 0: Mail it back
      Day 1: They get my return
      Day 2: Nothing happens
      Day 3: They ship my next movie
      Day 4: I get my next movie

      N3tfl1x TEH HATE5 ME!!!1

    39. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Glsai · · Score: 1

      Same here, I think I've been throttled too. There is a distribution center about 20 minutes away. For months, when I dropped a disc in the mail it'd show received later that day and a new one was in my mailbox two days later. So I could do two cycles of discs a week. Now I'm lucky if I get one cycle a week. I'm stopping my subscription at the end of the month. And yeah I'm one of those heavy users, I'd say in the last years I've rented 500-600 discs easy.

    40. Re:Advantage: Amazon by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      Netflix Addict is free and runs on Windows, Mac, Linux and any other OS that supports Java.

    41. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I liked that a lot, until I was spending half an hour per visit scouring the shelves for something I wanted to watch.

      It's great, until you blow through the selection at the local Blockbuster...

      I'm trying GreenCine. Haven't formulated an opinion yet, although the selection seems rockin'.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    42. Re:Advantage: Amazon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the internet. This is exactly how nearly every online subscription service (all porn sites, for example) works. They have an incentive to require that you affirmatively *stop* the service rather than just stopping when your trial is done. Your service is uninterupted and they continue to get paid. This is analogous to Columbia House and similar.

    43. Re:Advantage: Amazon by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I read at +1. Anonymous replies are a waste of my time, because they almost certainly will not result in a discussion. Similarly, I dno't pay attention to people who yell at me as I drive by ("Get off the sidewalk, moron"), because they'll never hear my reply anyway ("the sidewalk doesn't have 8-ft lanes devided by white dashed lines, jackass")

    44. Re:Advantage: Amazon by jiminim · · Score: 1

      I guess I don't understand this argument...do you never leave the house to go to work, buy groceries..etc.? There are tons of US mailboxes out there in the town...I always just drop my stuff in the drive by mail boxes on the way to work in the mornings when I have mail to send...

      Mom goes and works and gets the groceries so that he can play video games in the basement all day!

    45. Re:Advantage: Amazon by betrue · · Score: 1

      What if Amazon buys Netflix? Last year around May when Blockbuster was getting launched, there were rmors that Netflix is so powerful that it might actually buy Blockbuster. Who knows what may happen...

  2. Instant gratification by phpm0nkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was a NetFlix subscriber for about two years, because they were the best of what was around. Recently, I switched to Blockbuster's in-store unlimited rentals, because it could give me something that NetFlix couldn't: instant gratification.

    I am fickle. With NetFlix, I too frequently found a DVD in my mailbox that I felt like watching 3 days ago. Being able to pick out a movie and be watching it 20 minutes later really makes a world of difference.

    Perhaps NetFlix will go one better. With movie downloads just around the bend, it appears that they're taking innovation and competition in their industry very seriously. Amazon may have the inventory and distribution architecture to easily catapult themselves into the market, but if they don't have anything more interesting than DVDs-by-mail on the horizon, they may quickly find themselves left behind.

    1. Re:Instant gratification by dazzla_2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Their other advantage is they've already done this in the UK.

    2. Re:Instant gratification by Ingolfke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I was a Blockbuster subscriber... but after a year (and the dreck that's been coming out of Hollywood) I ran out of movies to watch. I wish they'd stock more TV shows (new and old).

      If Blockbuster could work out a deal w/ the movie industry to burn the DVDs onsite so they could have all the benefits of an unlimited DVD inventory and all the convenience of 20 minute turn around times, I think they'd really hurt NetFlix & Amazon's business.

    3. Re:Instant gratification by Threni · · Score: 1

      > but if they don't have anything more interesting than DVDs-by-mail on the
      > horizon, they may quickly find themselves left behind.

      I think the `being sent a dvd in the post` horizon looms more closely than the `watching a film on your pc monitor` in my country, although perhaps where you live people with broadband connections and 30 inch pc monitors outnumber those with a front door and a dvd player...

    4. Re:Instant gratification by xao+gypsie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only issue I take to that is this: I have to haul my ass all the way to blockbuster to get the video. I live in an oldish city, and the nearest blockbuster is hard to get to. it is usually crowded on that block, and it forces me to parallel park. I would rather just get "back into the mood" to watch a movie that I don't have to drive to get.

      --


      xao
      http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
    5. Re:Instant gratification by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      besides some thing like this makes me very doubtful about joining netflix.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    6. Re:Instant gratification by MyTwoCentsWorth · · Score: 1

      You might want to also see

      April 29 post

      for related info.
      Happy posting.

    7. Re:Instant gratification by yotto · · Score: 1

      I think the `being sent a dvd in the post` horizon looms more closely than the `watching a film on your pc monitor` in my country, although perhaps where you live people with broadband connections and 30 inch pc monitors outnumber those with a front door and a dvd player...

      I think the "Not having your TV Hooked up to the ineternet" horizion is closer than either of those.

    8. Re:Instant gratification by StarvingSE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is true, but its hard to find an older movie at blockbuster. My experience is that if an older movie is lost or damaged at blockbuster, they dont reorder it and I can't rent it again. The online renters have thousands more movies in stock, and also tv shows and things like that.

      With online retailers, I have found netflix to have much faster turn around times than blockbuster online. Netflix also seems to have many more copies of movies and a better selection. Just my observations.

      --
      I got nothin'
    9. Re:Instant gratification by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree. However, I tend not to support large, aggressive, "family" based, international media conglomerates. The difference for me isn't worth becoming a corporate whore.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    10. Re:Instant gratification by rale,+the · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the throttling thing is a bit of an exageration. I just pulled up my 3 month history on netflix's site, and I rented 20, 15, and 17 dvds for a total of 52 over 90 days. Before that I was renting roughly the same amount aswell. I have the 3 at a time plan, which is $18 a month. That means I'm paying $54 for 3 months, which works out to $1.04 per rental, whereas that site says they'll throttle you if you get under $2/per. It is possible that the occasional extra day waits are some sort of throttling measure, but it doesnt seem to me that they're very aggressive, if so. Well, atleast I think I'm getting a pretty good deal at 1.04/each.

    11. Re:Instant gratification by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      We got my Dad a Netflix subscription a couple of years ago and he still has it.

      We got a Blockbuster Online subscription and it's fantastic. It's cheaper than Netflix and has two "free" in-store rentals each month. So you get the delivery stuff but you can also get your instant gratification if you need something on short notice.

      Other than their site needing a serious reworking (no middle clicking to open new tabs?!) it's an excellent service.

    12. Re:Instant gratification by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      > that site says they'll throttle you if you get under $2/per.

      Wow. This is the first time I've heard of a customer disincentive program.

      So, do they use piano wire, or what?

    13. Re:Instant gratification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I switched to Blockbuster's in-store unlimited rentals, because it could give me something that NetFlix couldn't: instant gratification.

      I couldn't do it. Blockbuster edits their movies for content, which is evil. Besides, while I may act on impulse... I generally know what I want to watch 'soon' (more than 20 mins into the future).

      The selection is horrible ay Blockbuster, and a lot of movies that are 4:3 are not clearly labeled so.

    14. Re:Instant gratification by dlefavor · · Score: 1
      With movie downloads just around the bend,

      I think they'd have called themselves "Postflix" if they didn't have this in mind all along...

    15. Re:Instant gratification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're so hilarious! don't want to be a corporate whore? then quit thanking microsoft for fucking you up the ass! quit sucking so much redmond cock! you're already such a corporate whore around this board it's not even funny. it is kinda funny how you don't see it, tho.

    16. Re:Instant gratification by nexus987 · · Score: 1

      52 movies in 90 days?!? You've GOT to get out more ...

    17. Re:Instant gratification by stecoop · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster online rental has TV shows and that is all I rent. I watched 3 years worth of 24 in month or two. I dont like 2 hour movies anymore. I like the long series where there is more character building and not a big rush to a dramatic kaboom.

    18. Re:Instant gratification by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1
      If you're on the West Coast check out Greencine. They focus more on Indy films, cult and docs and since they have a much smaller customer base you can actually email them and request a movie and they go out and try to find it for you.

      They're based in San Francisco though so if you live a few states away it may not be worth the extra shipping time.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    19. Re:Instant gratification by Threni · · Score: 1

      >> I think the `being sent a dvd in the post` horizon looms more closely than the
      >>`watching a film on your pc monitor` in my country

      > I think the "Not having your TV Hooked up to the ineternet" horizion is closer
      > than either of those.

      Wouldn't that be the first horizon?

    20. Re:Instant gratification by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I'll dump Microsoft as soon as there's a decent alternative. Right now, there's NO good alternative on the market. If it's a toss up between BallBuster and a local guy (or even Netflix), I'll go with the local guy or Netflix in a heartbeat.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    21. Re:Instant gratification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with you. The link published by grandparent is horribly off. I've rented 62 DVDs in the past 90 days. Sometimes there is a 1 day delay, but usually there is not. That link says the delay will be 7 days, which is BS.

    22. Re:Instant gratification by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      "Blockbuster edits their movies for content, which is evil."

      No it doesn't. I'm a subscriber. It doesn't.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    23. Re:Instant gratification by TheKubrix · · Score: 1

      mod parent down.

      The biggest problem with blockbuster stores is their incredible lack of selection, and the movies they DO have tend to be checked out, especially on weekends when most people want to watch movies...

    24. Re:Instant gratification by nsayer · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's cheaper than Netflix

      Not anymore.

    25. Re:Instant gratification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you didn't mention the other feature that comes with Block Buster that Net Flix doesn't offer, a censor. Net Flix offers you the whole movie, while Block Buster will only deliver the part they approve of.

    26. Re:Instant gratification by telecsan · · Score: 1

      The best part about the 2 free rentals you get with Blockbuster Online is they are good for video games too, which is worth about $14/month around here ($6.99 video game rental x2) So, I was basically paying $.99 for the 3 at a time movies. Granted, that's going up now, but not enough to change the economics.

      With all the crappy video games out there I'd like to try for less than the $50 tag, this works out nicely.

  3. Amazon's Advantage by johnnyb · · Score: 1

    I think Amazon's advantage is that because of the sheer volume of shipping they currently do they can probably get better prices on video shipping.

    However, personally, I really never use Amazon for anything more than books. Perhaps it has caught on in other markets, but I really see Amazon as a book place. I think my first instinct would still be to go to Netflix if I wanted to rent movies.

    1. Re:Amazon's Advantage by garcia · · Score: 3, Informative

      However, personally, I really never use Amazon for anything more than books.

      Why? In addition to books (used and new) I have bought multiple things there including two GPS units and a mobile phone.

      The latest GPS unit (GPSMap 76CS) was on sale, no rebates necessary, and priced $50 less than its lower end unit (76C). Six months later, the price I got (with no mail-in-rebates) is still less than you can find 99% of the time.

      The mobile phone (T-mobile Sidekick 1) came with instant and mail-in-rebates that totalled enough to make the phone $0 with on year of service.

      Why would you only go to Amazon for books when there are so many bargains on there that I seem to only be able to find there?

      I'm not an amazon.com rep, investor, or otherwise, just a happy customer.

    2. Re:Amazon's Advantage by aacool · · Score: 1

      I joined Amazon Prime - the all-you-can-eat shipping program, and it significantly changed my shopping habits - I'm buying more stuff, but it's relevant to my preferences. And I always look on Amazon first. Two-day shipping is great too.

      On the Netflix competition front, it is interesting that Netflix has not yet, AFAIK, used it's patent on the DVD delivery/rental service that it took out a long time back.

      Culturally, Amazon will be a better fit, competitively, than Wal-mart and Blockbuster, because it has no brick-and-mortar affiliation or overhead, similar to Netflix. I believe that an acquisition is not ruled out here. It's basically a 'Buy v. Build' decision, IMHO

    3. Re:Amazon's Advantage by The+Woodworker · · Score: 1

      Multiple GPS units?? Did you get lost twice?

      --
      Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
    4. Re:Amazon's Advantage by garcia · · Score: 1

      It's called an upgrade. Color screen and autorouting -- up from black and white and only an arrow pointing me as the crow flies.

    5. Re:Amazon's Advantage by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      It's mostly because other stuff I generally want to see and touch before buying. Books and computers are the only thing I'll buy from a distance. That's probably related to how familiar I am with the two.

    6. Re:Amazon's Advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon has a great service. I'm boycotting though, because of their attitude towards software patents.

  4. Can't wait for the recommendations feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    People who viewed "Anal Invaders 4" also enjoyed...

    1. Re:Can't wait for the recommendations feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who viewed "Anal Invaders 4" also enjoyed...

      Oblig: Gay Niggers From Outer Space!

    2. Re:Can't wait for the recommendations feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who viewed "Anal Invaders 4" also enjoyed...

      Planet of the Gapes, Bend Over and Cough, and The Dukes of Hazzard.

    3. Re:Can't wait for the recommendations feature by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

      "Back Door Sluts 9"

      --
      "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
    4. Re:Can't wait for the recommendations feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who viewed "Anal Invaders 4" also enjoyed...

      but I never saw Anal Invaders 3...

  5. netflix is nice but by brickballs · · Score: 1

    netflix is very nice, but i ended up canceling my service. I had it for a few months but eventualy canceled because i dont watch enough movies to make it worth my while.

    --
    "What does slashdotting mean?"
    "You've never heard of slashdot?"
    "I know it makes websites not work."
  6. ask not..... by xao+gypsie · · Score: 1

    ...for whom the bell tolls, for it tolls for Blockbuster!!!

    --


    xao
    http://TheHillforum.hopto.org
  7. Operation by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When netflix lowered their price in competition with blockbuster, netflix claimed they were in jeopardy of making pennies for profit. The opposite happened and their stock prices went higher.

    I am really confused as to whether everybody is still overcharging. Considering everyone has an endless queue list that seem to be sending things out of order again and again. There is still a real supply problem.

    1. Re:Operation by The+Dobber · · Score: 1


      Just cause thier stock value went up doesn't mean they're making profit.

      Remember the days of sock puppets and on-line grocery shopping?

    2. Re:Operation by Mad_Rain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am really confused as to whether everybody is still overcharging. Considering everyone has an endless queue list that seem to be sending things out of order again and again. There is still a real supply problem.

      I should probably not give away a secret this good, especially on slashdot, but I've been renting newly released DVD movies from my local library for $1.50. Same length of time from the video store (About 3 days) and significantly cheaper than any of the local area chain video stores. Documentaries and TV series are free to rent, and you can keep some of those up to 3 weeks. Sometimes there is a wait on the TV series, but overall it's worked beautifully for me.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    3. Re:Operation by deesine · · Score: 0

      The fee is only $1.00 at my library. Can keep for a week. But the selection if small, very small. Tried both Netflix and BlockBuster online services: the turn-around time is bad for both, worse for BB.

      Now I use the BB in-store service, 2 at a time for $20/month. New movies come out on Tuesdays, and you've got to be there early, otherwise they're gone.

      I think Netflix's days are numbered, unless they start offering other services. BB will eventually work out their shipping woes. Also, they plan on integrating their brick and mortars with their online service, so you can get movies by mail, return them to a store, and visa versa.

      The movie rental business has never been better, for me as a customer.

      --
      damaged by dogma
  8. They better get a patent! by goldspider · · Score: 1

    ...before anyone else can claim prior art!

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:They better get a patent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they haven't already applied for one, then it is probably too late.

  9. Internet users are very versatile by LastNickAvailable · · Score: 0

    History has shown that when it comes to Internet businesses, nothing is forever ... So if Amazon gives better service and/or better prices Netflix customers will have no remorse switching.

    1. Re:Internet users are very versatile by spidereyes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well Blockbuster price is lower so your statement isn't entirely correct. I've used both services for about a year. Netflix was incredibly smooth and I received movies very fast for the area I lived in. They have a lot of movies that I couldn't find in the brick and mortar stores. So I agree their service was second to none. I decided to save a few bucks and try Blockbuster. These guy's took a week to mail me my DVDs and were ALWAYS out of the movies I wanted to see. Then they would constantly get lost in the mail and the hassle wasn't worth the $3 savings. Secondly, I wanted to use a free rental, but didn't have the coupon on me. I asked the clerk if they could just look up my account. Of course their system isn't that smart and they consider it a totaly different entity. The next time I go in (with the coupon) and they ask me to sign-up for a card and everything. I decline and he turns me down for renting the video. I explain to him I have an online account and why do I need to sign-up for yet another account. I mean really how many things do I have to sign-up for to rent Kids? Because I'm a cheap bastard I was lulled into trying Blockbuster, but 4 weeks later I was happy again with my Netflix subscription. The old adage still goes, "You get what you pay for."

      --

      I say we just grow up, be adults and die.
  10. Already in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Amazon already have a DVD rental system in the UK. I have never tried it as I use LoveFilm, but I hear its ok.

    1. Re:Already in the UK by jantheman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use it.

      There are no complaints.

      fyi:

      Turn arond time typically 3 days (in the postbox by 12pm -> email telling you they've got it & what you're getting next -> receipt).

      Only one unreadable DVD out of ~ 20 so far. Using their online 'damage reported' method, they sent a replacement before I returned the bad one.

      --
      -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
    2. Re:Already in the UK by whisperingwind · · Score: 1

      In the UK yes, but so expensive I doubt they get much business. They want UKP 9.99/month for 6 DVDs. Typically, others charge UKP 15/month for 3 at a time, say 12 a month if you watch and return them quickly.

      --
      Mike Wilson, Wrexham, North Wales, UK
    3. Re:Already in the UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually cheaper than a TV license. Old news according to here

    4. Re:Already in the UK by jbb999 · · Score: 1

      I use them in the UK and am happy. In the 6 months I've been a member they've messed up my billing twice, once closing my account for not paying (when they didn;t take the money...) and once billing me twice... But both times I complained by email and get back replies within minutes which were helpful, accurate, polite and with a proper apology. I don't mind people messing up if they put it right efficiently.

    5. Re:Already in the UK by TBR · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use it and it works very well, had Zero problems with the system at all.

  11. News? by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:News? by grahamm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surely they already have the software for doing it. So why do they need to hire more programmers for it?

    2. Re:News? by pdbaby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the US is much larger than the UK or Germany, I'm guessing. That means stock's moving greater distances which means that moving it's more expensive which means you need to optimise movement and placement up the wazoo

      --
      Global symbol "$deity" requires explicit package name at line 2. - If only $scripture started "use strict;"
    3. Re:News? by sethaw · · Score: 1

      They might be just hiring additional developers for their UK website. The whole story of them renting dvds in the US seems to be only because they are hiring. They can and do hire developers in the US for their overseas operation. Everyone is jumping to the conclusion that they are hiring for a US DVD rental website, which is possible but not necessarily true. Amazon has indicated that they probably will set up a US dvd rental system in the past but they still haven't said publicly that they are going to.

    4. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This idea that they have to move stock between centers is ridiculous. If customer A is being serviced by center B, but B is missing movie C, and center D has it, they just ship from center D to customer A. Why would they ever move the item from center D to center B only to then ship it to customer A!?

  12. News? by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just US Amazon getting behind the times?

  13. Hmm... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...Amazon in the UK have been doing DVD rentals for a while now. Presumably this hasn't been true in the US until now?

    I wonder if they've held off to iron out the logistical problems that having a considerably larger distribution area will cause compared to us over in our tiny country :)

  14. Amazon already does this in the UK by jockm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Amazon already does this in the UK. Since learning about this from my friends over there, I figured it was just a matter of time before they brought the program over here.

    --

    What do you know I wrote a novel
    1. Re:Amazon already does this in the UK by bananasfalklands · · Score: 1
      Its not a very good range of films at amazon, if you want 'odd' stuff you normally end up at a specailist renter - there good for new releases i will grant them that but i dont want to see new releases as i have seen those at the cinema.

      Not the best deal either. Id rather use a specailist than a generalist.

      --
      Send Peter Clifford Francis Macrae comdoms to 23 Bedford St, St.Neots, PE19 1AX, England
  15. Amazon already do this in the UK by dazzla_2000 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    They've been there done that http://www.amazon.co.uk/

  16. Netflix around since 1998 by ayeco · · Score: 1

    FWIW, I recently read that Netflix started in 1998, Amazon 1994.

  17. It needs to have more selection by Elias+Ross · · Score: 1

    The only way Amazon would get me interested would be if they offered more foreign releases, such as region 2 and region 3 titles that Netflix doesn't offer. In my neighborhood is a rental company named Scarecrow Video that offers 70,000 unique titles (compare to 40k of Netflix). They have VHS tapes and laser disks dating back to the 80s, things that never made it to DVD, and DVDs that are out of print.

    Anyway, for your Average Joe/Jane, selection isn't that important. But I really like a comprehensive store, especially with Asian titles that never make it to the States.

    1. Re:It needs to have more selection by cens0r · · Score: 1

      Another scarecrow fan! They have everything, and it's usually instant gratification. No longer do I have to wait for the cooul foriegn movie to come out in the US, I simply go and get the DVD.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    2. Re:It needs to have more selection by anagama · · Score: 1

      For the other 279,000,000 US residents who don't live near this store, Netflix is more than we ever had. I'm jealous.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    3. Re:It needs to have more selection by Badlands · · Score: 1
      Netflix has been my main source of 2+ films per week for 4 years, and their service is great, IMHO. I have sent in the disc in the wrong envelope and they politely handled it with me. The few times I have received a scratched disc, they sent me an "extra" disc so that I actually had 4 in my hand for a short time (even tho I have the 3-at-a-time service).

      But I agree that the selection is not good enough, at least for some of us. I would say that 20% of the films I look for, are not in Netflix' library. But it is currently the best alternative on the market for those who refuse to walk to a physical store and wait in line.

      My hope is that Amazon will take away the soft underbelly of the video market for those who have been too lazy or fear-averse to investigate Netflix. Then, Netflix will be forced to compete in the "Scarecrow" market, providing 'specialty' videos to those of us who appreciate it (did I suggest a merging of the 2? hmmmmmmm). And by the way, I'll pay more for such a service!

  18. Who cares, I'm boycotting amazon by Serveert · · Score: 1

    I'll stick with netflix unless they go patent crazy.

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
    1. Re:Who cares, I'm boycotting amazon by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, they do have a patent that pretty much covers renting DVDs via the internet. Expect to see them suing Amazon soon. Then again, Amazon could probably hit back with some patents of their own, so maybe they won't sue. Still, Netflix is as patent crazy as most other businesses now.

    2. Re:Who cares, I'm boycotting amazon by DoTheRightThing · · Score: 1
      I watch lot of movies and i had 8 movies out plan with netflix..Few weeks back i got this email:

      Dear xxxx,

      Thanks for your message.

      We are sending out this message in an ongoing effort to improve our service and protect our customers' interests, by continuing to provide large inventories of titles for our Rental Service. Given the unusually high number of discs unaccounted for, it appears that your shipping address is located in a high-risk area for our merchandise. As we are concerned about future shipments to your address, we feel it is in Netflix's best interest to discontinue our business relationship with you. Please understand that we do not blame you for this. We hope that by being alerted of this situation, you may be encouraged to locate the problem in your area and recover any additional mail that may have been compromised. If you are able to locate any of the titles that have been marked as lost on your account, or have additional information that would aid us in the recovery of our merchandise, please let us know. At that time, we would be willing to reconsider our decision and cancel any investigations that may need to be initiated. Please understand that we do not blame you for these losses. Netflix must receive all outstanding rentals within 14 days of cancellation or we will automatically charge your credit card a replacement fee for the unreturned DVDs. All items in your Rental Queue will be deleted and you will no longer have access to your Rental Queue. As a courtesy to you we have credited the last month of service on your account. We appreciate your past patronage and understanding in this matter. If you have any further questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us.

      Thanks,

      Edward,

      Netflix Customer Service .

      I talked with the netflix customer service many times asking them to investigate in to this matter.They never disclose what kind of investigation they are doing..they just send me higher up the corporate ladder and every one means the same thing...THEY DONT NEED ME.

      1.I didnt steal any movies.

      2.Its not my fault that they have a faulty business model.

      3.Why should i be the victim?

      So fuck Netflix.I welcome amazon and i hope they have good foreign movie collection.

    3. Re:Who cares, I'm boycotting amazon by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Given the unusually high number of discs unaccounted for, it appears that your shipping address is located in a high-risk area for our merchandise."

      Maybe you consider a move to a better neighborhood where they won't steal your DVD's out of your mail box? Or...install a mail slot that drops the mail INTO your house, where it is safe?

      If you're losing movies to thieves...what else are you losing?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Who cares, I'm boycotting amazon by DoTheRightThing · · Score: 1

      The thing is that no one knows where the movies were getting lost and even if i move to a different neighbborhood, they are not going to restart my membership. They are saying that the investigation is goin on and ..it goes on indefinately.

  19. Combination with shipping by Blindman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The way that Amazon could really gain an advantage is if they could find a way to combine buying other items with DVD rental. If I could buy a book, and get it shipped free with my incoming DVD that would be something. Otherwise, I don't see how they can compete except on price or name regonition.

    --
    I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    1. Re:Combination with shipping by domipheus · · Score: 1

      Whilst not exactly what you're after, Amazon UK give a 10% discount on DVD purchases if you are a rental subscriber.

  20. Too Late? by canolecaptain · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With the deployment of the XBox 360 in mass quantities in '06, content producers will have the ability to content lock their movies. Microsoft will finally be able to promise that security to media execs, which will then loosen them up enough to allow the streaming to occur. When that desire is coupled with the increased availability of broadband, the on-demand downloading will finally go mainstream with Microsoft attempting to lead the way. Others in this market will be Apple with iVideo, potentially Sony on the PS3, and potentially juggernaut Google to the PC.
    Unless Amazon can couple the download with the the DVD rental (both will be necessary), they will be too late to be of consequence. My guess is that Netflix, Intelliflix, and Blockbuster will all begin on demand downloads by the end of next year.

    1. Re:Too Late? by Fatchap · · Score: 1

      Saw on the register http://www.theregister.co.uk/ on Monday that in the UK BoxOffice365.com has already started. At moment they have nob all content, but it is a start.

      --
      The only reason some people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
    2. Re:Too Late? by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      With the deployment of the XBox 360 in mass quantities in '06, content producers will have the ability to content lock their movies. Microsoft will finally be able to promise that security to media execs...

      Let's think. Target age of an XBox is between teenager to twenty something geek male. Basically, a high percentage of the people that comment on posts like:

      http://games.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/03/ 148257&from=rss

      These are the same people that are already more likely to be computer literate and steal, borrow, infringe, or whatever you want to call obtaining copyrighted material without paying for it.

      These are the same people that repeatedly say that $300 is too much for a game console and $60 per game is too much also.

      I would assume that the target audience that Amazon is trying to attract would be somewhat different for their movie service. I could be wrong though.

    3. Re:Too Late? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      With the deployment of the XBox 360 in mass quantities in '06, content producers will have the ability to content lock their movies.

      Yes, of course. The deployment of tens of thousands of Xbox360en are going to make the market that serves millions of DVD player owners disappear.

    4. Re:Too Late? by canolecaptain · · Score: 1

      Actually, that target age has risen as the younger generation have gotten older. Nearly all of my collegues own an XBox (30-40+ years old), though some of them use the excuse that it's "for the kids" even though their kids are less than 10. :-)

      Look at the statistics of 'households' containing an XBox / PS3 by mid to late next year, and you'd probably see that most of them have sufficient income to burn on a movie download subscription. In addition, as soon as the VoIP service is available for XBox, Microsoft will license it to other voice over IP set top box providers that will cater to other demographics.

  21. no point when many films are £5 on DVD by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of course it depends on your taste in films, the rocky box set is £25 in one store near where i work. bought Solaris last week for £4 from Virgin Megastore. Having about 6 stores within half a mile of where i work all fighting to get rid of lots of stock at cheap prices is great. And then there's the (probably legally dubious) ex rentals from my local blockbuster and choice videos offering newish films at low low prices. in this instance i tend to buy really obscure/foreign films that are highly unlikely to have been watched that many times = bargains.

    obviously i dont know how well this all translates across the pond but basically i hardly ever rent and when i do it's because it's 7pm and me and the missus are a bit bored of my japanese samurai film collection and she sends me to the video store to find something "girly". we dont go online and find something to watch in a couple of days.

    but having said that i'm far too tight to fork out the cash for the stanley kubrik boxed set. now i might be tempted to rent THAT for a few quid, a whole weekend of kubrik and post it back. handy. think i just defeated my own point!

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:no point when many films are £5 on DVD by daern · · Score: 1

      ...and she sends me to the video store to find something "girly"....

      Now that's a fine lady you have. When there's nothing on TV, she sends you to the video shop for porn!

    2. Re:no point when many films are £5 on DVD by Malc · · Score: 1

      Boasting about buying Solaris at any price is big no-no. Please tell me I missunderstood and you were referring to the product from Sun Microsystems.

  22. Meanwhile, on-demand is falling behind.. by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...at least for Comcast.

    When I'm not blowing $18-21 at a time to rent a whole season of a tv show at the local video store(yes, I know I should go netflix), I give Comcast VOD a try.

    So let's go watch Constantine.. Wait, it's not listed. Okay, let's go watch Hellboy..wait. No, wait, the only have bottom-of-the box office barrel movies available.

    Comcast's offerings of VOD is incredibly pathetic for being such a mega-corp. You would think DVD distributors would lend them a few episodes of a TV show they just released for free viewing. Then,if you like the show so much you could buy it. Free advertising. Give 'em a taste.

    Heck, let me pay a small fee to VOD the HBO/Showtime premium tv shows, without having to subscribe to said premiums.

    So far, VOD to me is a dud.

    1. Re:Meanwhile, on-demand is falling behind.. by jskiff · · Score: 1

      So let's go watch Constantine.. Wait, it's not listed. Okay, let's go watch Hellboy..wait. No, wait, the only have bottom-of-the box office barrel movies available.

      You mean like Constantine and Hellboy?

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    2. Re:Meanwhile, on-demand is falling behind.. by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

      Yes, I will have to agree that OnDemand has been mismanaged across the board from its inception.

      Virtually everything is Pan And Scan, only a handful of programs are Widescreen, and the decision about what gets the P&S or Wide treatment is seemingly random. Small indie films which will probably be viewed by Widescreen devotees are P&S, while crap romantic comedies are presented in your choice of P&S or Wide. Any time older films are added to the pay-per-view part and put on sale for a reduced rate, it is never, ever in Widescreen. A few months ago I was ready to order "The Good, The Bad and The Ugly", "Platoon" and several other films. But all of them were P&S.

      Networks that try to lure you into their series by placing a season of their shows OnDemand often do it in the most half-assed way possible. (HBO, I'm looking at you).

      Nothing is worse than trying to get into a show, only to discover that you have episodes 1-17 and 19-22 of the 22 episode season available for viewing. The latter episodes are sometimes marked for expiration from the service at a date earlier than the earlier episodes in the season. You may spend a few days plowing through a season, only to have the last two episiodes deleted from the lineup by the time you get to them, while the rest of the season remains. It makes absolutely no sense, and is delivered in such a way that makes me think it was designed to make it so that you are unable to catch up to the upcoming season. If I can't catch up, I won't watch it. Simple as that.

      This is why Netflix will remain my choice provider of films and TV shows. I refuse to watch any film in Pan And Scan, and I can't drop $50-$100 to watch one season of one show.

    3. Re:Meanwhile, on-demand is falling behind.. by angle_slam · · Score: 1
      What is annoying to me about Comcast On Demand is their guitar lessons. They've had the same lessons on for 4 months, with a listed expiration date of August 6, 2005. So I check yesterday, expecting to be able to learn a bunch of new songs. Instead, it's the exact same songs, only with an expiration date of January 2006.

      And HBO On Demand is annoying also. They refuse to even state a release date of the DVD of the Third Season of The Wire. But they only show 5 episodes at a time on OD. And they're still stuck in the second season.

  23. Infinite Resources, Massive Distribution Network by kingradar · · Score: 1


    Simple answer, yes they can.

    They already have a massive distribution network, with wharehouses all over the country, equipped with the latest in inventory management hardware/software. They have agreements in place with all of the major shipping companies, and DVD distributors.

    All they lack is a website. I'm not quite sure if they can figure out how to create a website though. Might be why they are seeking to hire some engineers.

  24. Maybe the first real competition Netflix has had by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember all kinds of handwringing about Walmart or Blockbuster running Netflix out of business. Sort of like the handwringing we read a few years ago when people were saying things like "Yeah, Amazon's fine now, but wait until REAL vendors like B&N or Borders get into the online market. They'll crush Amazon." The things that make Amazon and Netflix unique, and successful where the name brands we already knew have come up short, all have to do with the fact that the "new guys" like Amazon and Netflix have some real experience doing an online business and understand (and have built) the infrastructure required to do so, whereas the "big name" B&M people have litle idea of what they're getting themselves into when they go to battle with the internet guys. So, after hand-wringing about Walmart running Netflix out of business, I read that Netflix has absorbed the shards of Walmart's attempts to enter this business. But Amazon is a different issue. They might not have a lot of experience with media rental, but they've got a ton of experience running a large, distributed internet storefront. Or, they might underestimate what Netflix accomplishes already. I guess we aren't really gonna know until it's over.

  25. Books anyone? by rdurell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I could see Amazon doing with books what Netflix does with DVDs. It is essentially the same thing with the same issues.

    1. Re:Books anyone? by CannibalCrowley · · Score: 1

      Well there are these things called libraries that already rent out books. All you have to do is go there and ask for a card. I really don't see anyone coming up with a pricing plan that will encourage people to use their system for a fee instead of the library around the corner.

    2. Re:Books anyone? by rdurell · · Score: 1

      Of course many libraries also lend DVDs. Somehow Blockbuster has managed to stay in business.

  26. SELL SELL SELL by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1

    Time to sell your netfilx stock. Sell short if you don't have any!

  27. Sticking With Netflix by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    I like Amazon in general, but I'm going to stick with Netflix for now. I've been a member since they started and I've seen the service continue to improve over that time. I like them because for me it is a real hassle to go to BlockBuster and Netflix has more movies that cater to my outside of the mainstream tastes, like foriegn films and anime. If Netflix can continue to appeal to niche markets as well as the mainstream, then they have a shot.

    1. Re:Sticking With Netflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had NETFLIX for several months while waiting to get DirecTV installed. (With 2 tivo systems and 3 mos of all the premium movie channels available I cancelled netflix) Now that the free movie channels thing is over I am thinking of turning netflix back on again. They are a VERY good service...

      Regular rental is more expensive and for us it is 1/2 hr round trip to video rental place... (I think we had it under 1 dollar per movie as long as we did not let them sit around waiting to be viewed) We intentionally staggered the return of a movie by a day or so in order to keep from getting 3 new movies to view at the same time.

  28. Re:Infinite Resources, Massive Distribution Networ by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 0

    "All they lack is a website."

    And customers willing to rent from them. They will have to earn the trust of those who rent regularly from Netflix. In fact, I'll venture to say that unless they can offer some significant benefit that Netflix can't offer then they will have a long, tall hill to climb in developing new customers.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  29. A haiku. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1, Funny

    Netflix is doomed
    Amazon awakens soon
    We want cheap movies

    1. Re:A haiku. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corrected! (4-7-5 does not a proper haiku make)

      Netflix will be doomed
      Amazon.com enters
      We want cheap movies

  30. I Look Forward To Amazon Doing This by Evil+W1zard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hopefully Amazon will offer a competitive price and that will hopefully lead to lower prices on Netflix...

    If Amazon does a good job here I would probably switch over because I have noticed that everytime I start returning a lot of movies back to Netflix there is a mysterious slow down in delivery of new movies on their part. They blame it on the Post Office but there distro facility is right down the road and checking with the Post Office there really is no delay. It looks to me like Netflix either doesn't process returned movies quick enough or delays them so you get less movies per month if you happen to be watching/returning them too fast. Anyone else have that issue?

    --
    News Reporters Make Tasty Polar Bear Treats!
    1. Re:I Look Forward To Amazon Doing This by crumshot · · Score: 1

      Yep, I had this exact problem. I was a Netflix subscriber for 3 months on the 5 at a time plan. In 2 months I must have gone through somewhere around 60-70 DVDs. By the time the third month rolled around, deliveries were no longer taking 2 days. They would receive a movie one day, and I would get a new one exactly a week later. I put up with this for 2-3 weeks just to make sure it wasn't a postal delay, but sure enough, every DVD took at least a week to be delivered. That was the last straw for me. I cancelled and will never sign up for Netflix again. So much for unlimited rentals. Sheesh.

    2. Re:I Look Forward To Amazon Doing This by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It looks to me like Netflix either doesn't process returned movies quick enough or delays them so you get less movies per month if you happen to be watching/returning them too fast. Anyone else have that issue?

      Netflix does have an odd system. They don't overtly slow you down, but the very frequent renters seem to get put at the back of the queue.

      I've also noticed they would never send back more than 1 movie each day, even though I might send them 3 at a time.

      However, a few months ago, when the service really slowed to a crawl, I think they were having problems with their system. I'd send a movie back, and they wouldn't report it as recieved for several days. Getting rather annoyed, I just reported every movie as lost in the mail if they didn't get it within 2 days. They still got the movies back a few days later, so I wasn't marked as some truant customer. After about a month, everything cleared-up, they were back up to their old speed, and now they are even sending me movies 2 at a time. I have to assume they just over-taxed their distribution facilities. If I had problems like that back when they had raised their price, I would have dropped the service myself. Since it was after they had lowered their prices, I was willing to put-up with it for a while, and everything worked-out.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  31. if walmart couldnt make it by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    I doubt amazon will fare any better. 

  32. Re:Infinite Resources, Massive Distribution Networ by kingradar · · Score: 1


    They have two advantages over Netflix. The first is that Amazon has a more mainstream audience. Netflix clearly dominates the market amongst early-adopters, but that leaves things open for Blockbuster and Amazon both of which have a more mainstream customer base to draw from.

    The second is that Amazon can run this program at a net loss, or breakeven point while it builds the economies of scale needed for profit. They can do this because they have money in the bank from their other lines of business, and because they can view what money they lose on this operation as an 'advertising' expense. This service will no-doubt drive clicks to amazon.com, which will result in more sales from their other product offerings. Not to mention how likely it is that someone will purchase a DVD they rented using the Amazon service.

  33. Just because there are already two players... by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    ...Doesn't mean that Amazon can't succeed. Netflix did good and Blockbuster was scared so they jumped in. As a few readers pointed out however, they like their instant gratification and to be able to walk into the store and get what they want when they want it. Consider Blockbuster a bricks and mortar store that happens to have an online component.

    The real point here however is that just because Netflix and Blockbuster online exist doesn't mean Amazon can't come along and emerge as the winner. There were how many mp3 player manufacturers back in '01 with Rio (if my memory is working correctly this morning) being the big player along with all the others. Along comes Apple and they crushed the competition. If Amazon does it right, and I'm sure they've done their homework, they could easily rise to the top.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  34. reliability by domipheus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A problem I see with that is postage, books are considerably larger and heavier == expensive.

    Also, books get damaged far quicker than dvd's. I dont think it is a real option for them.

  35. Who cares what you're doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sure don't.

    1. Re:Who cares what you're doing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be sure to note that in my diary.

  36. Fluke by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I have the Netflix super-duper account (8 movies at a time), and have for a while. What you're describing, I've seen I think once or twice in more than a year. Just a glitch, in my opinion. As a hardcore movie buff, I think that Netflix is just fantastic. Good service, quick turnaround, and a much, much better selection than somebody like BallBuster could ever have. Plus, they don't intentionally mislead their customers like BallBuster (hence the "no late fees!" class action lawsuit). I feel bad for not going to my local video store, but considering I try to watch one new (to me) movie every night, I was quickly going broke at my local store.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  37. uh... by rwven · · Score: 1

    I thought amazon bought out netflix.... or was that another company? Wasn't there a story about the sale a little hwile back on /.?

  38. Re:unlimited online rentals !!!!??? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
    Can some one please explein this to me, both Netflix and BlockBuster advertise service as "unlimited online rentals" How can some one rent UNLIMITED DVD a month. Do thay have "UNLIMITED" DVD in store? There is a limit like 10-24 DVD a month (3 out plan) or We have 45K DVD titles. rent as musch as you like. How is this UNLIMITED?

    Don't be daft. "Unlimited" as they use it clearly means that the terms of DVD rental have no hard number limiting your rentals, but rather the number of movies you get is limited only by the number of movies available and the logistics of getting those movies to you. Just like the "bottomless cup" of coffee they offer at the local diner isn't really bottomless, but is simply a regular cup that they will refill until you've had enough and leave.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  39. Already out here in the UK by tezza · · Score: 1
    Bizarre. I did a double take.

    Amazon.co.uk already does DVD rentals, and I'm a subscriber.

    Must be a Market Acceptance tester. Similar to how some movies are released in Australia first to see whether they will float or not.

    --
    [% slash_sig_val.text %]
    1. Re:Already out here in the UK by jdunlevy · · Score: 1
  40. I really like the Amazon service by el_womble · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the US service is as good as the UK service, this should do quite well. Neat little DVD holders, clever postage packaging and fast turn around and the price was significantly cheaper than renting from Blockbusters. My only complaint was that my girlfriend has taken it over. In the last month she has made me watch The Notebook, Million Dollar Baby and Piglet the Movie. Apparently, I'm not allowed to rent Shaolin Soccer because we can't both watch it?!?!?!

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  41. How inexpensive is enough? by awfar · · Score: 1

    I read that some are so twitchy that a couple days delay is too much for them to bear: I read some that say Netflix is too expensive:

    As compared to what?

    As a WalMart Rental ejectee, I find Netflix to be fair, honest, fast, and have a great selection.

    I suggest that being so twitchy is nothing to be proud of, and those who don't consider it a fair deal ~$20/month, a large pizza, for three outstanding to say what a fair deal is? Is $5 too much? If so, it should, and effectively is, a free service, so just say so.

  42. Better website? by aggressivepedestrian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think one thing Amazon will have going for them is their website. Assuming they leverage a lot of their existing code, their initial US launch should be miles ahead of Netflix. While Amazon is constantly adding new features that help me find interesting things in the long tail, I don't think Netflix has made an improvement to their website in the two years I've been a customer.

    Don't get me wrong, I like Netflix, but the recommendations they make for me are almost always off target. On the other hand, Amazon is always presenting me with interesting recommendations on music and books.

    That's just one feature that I expect they will execute better than Netflix. They also have a slew of fetaures Netflix doesn't offer. Some of the ones I've found useful include "the page you made", "customers who bought this also bought this", "customers who viewed this also viewed this".

    Then's there's "Artist Essentials". Just getting into jazz but overwhelmed by the many choices for say, Ella Fitzgerald? Then check out her "Artist Essentials". It's just a static list, so how hard could it be to implement? But if you want an opinion from Netflix about the best movies of, say, Jim Jarmusch, well, you're just SOL.

    All in all, I'd say Amazon's entry into this market will introduce some good competition, and we're all going to benefit.

    1. Re:Better website? by precogpunk · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that amazon has a killer recommendation engine but Netflix has been making small improvements. A few I can name off the top of my head include:
      * The new "Friends" feature where you can see what your friends are watching and make recommendations.
      * Localized top 100 list; see what's popular in your town.
      * Allowing other family members to login and have a rationed amount of the overall queue.
      * RSS feed for your queue.

    2. Re:Better website? by CptSkippy · · Score: 1
      I don't think Netflix has made an improvement to their website in the two years I've been a customer.

      You've been a customer for 2 years and haven't noticed any of the improvements to their website? Did you fill your queue up that first year and haven't been back since?

      I like Netflix, but the recommendations they make for me are almost always off target.

      I've found their recommendations to be pretty accurate, it especially helps if you rate movies you've seen. I often find them one step ahead of me, recommending movies I heard a review for on NPR or was thinking about renting as a passing thought. I've even added stuff that looked interesting based solely on their recommendations and they were spot on.

      Some of the ones I've found useful include "the page you made", "customers who bought this also bought this", "customers who viewed this also viewed this".


      I'm not sure what the "the page you made" thing is but Netflix offers the equivalent of the last two. The also added their friends feature which will show you the ratings and comments of your friends on the movies you're reviewing. Shortly after maps.google.com came out they ripped off their look for their mouse over movie information boxes. They've added the multiple queues and the ability to buy previously viewed DVDs.

      They're not perfect but they've been making steady improvements and add new features all the time. I really can't see how you can say they haven't made any improvements.

      In addition to all of that, they carry a lot of obscure and foriegn films that my wife and I love to watch. I can always find something interesting to watch compared to Blockbuster where I was always finding myself walking aimlessly through the rows of crap looking for something that wasn't staring the flavor of the day.

      Where Netflix excells is in catering to those who want to watch films that were in limited release in the theater and not carried at blockbuster. They also strike a nice balance between obscure and mainstream and their model is very nice for children's video rentals because kids tend to want to watch the movie about 4000 times before they get burned out.
    3. Re:Better website? by badsegue · · Score: 1
      Netflix's site is pretty good. Since they only deal with DVDs you don't have all the clutter that Amazon has, where they will recommend a 28' ladder because the last person that got the movie you are browsing bought one.

      The recommendations seem pretty good for me when it recommends movies. The more you rate, the better it gets. They've also added the ability to rate genres, which is nice. I like that I don't get too many suggestions either. I've rated ~2000 movies, and only have about 25 reccomendations, so they are pretty selective.

      My two main complaints of Netflix's site are:
      1. Limited search: I'd like the ability to do an advanced search where I can specify the year of release, studio, actor, genre, director, or any combination.
      2. The queue page: It's way too clunky to manage when it gets large. But now you can use the Netflix Queue Manager, which solves that problem.
    4. Re:Better website? by Tedington · · Score: 1

      Personally, the Netflix recommendation system usually returns things I like, and the little sidebar telling you why it recommendeded that particular flick based on your ratings of other movies is helpful. I know when I rate things like TVONDVD highly simply because I like the show, I get bombarded with recommendations for crap TV on DVD, but that's something I can live with. For me the system works fairly well.

      Certainly better than Amazon's recommendations I find. There are too many things that Amazon sells for them to make a decent go of recommending things to you.

      An example: Just because I buy a Gamecube game, it doesn't mean I emphatically must have the Resident Evil Gamecube controller!!! Jeez.

      --
      and the man on the tape said that they'd suffocate, if the sharks would stop swimming in circles.
    5. Re:Better website? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I think one thing Amazon will have going for them is their website.

      Yeah, I sure do hate Netflix's simple and easy to use website. I'd much rather use Amazon's dense, impossible to read pages, packed full of usless information, mixed-in with lots of (text) ads for other products, from corner to corner.

      Advantage: Netflix.

      They also have a slew of fetaures Netflix doesn't offer. Some of the ones I've found useful include "the page you made", "customers who bought this also bought this", "customers who viewed this also viewed this".

      You've been a Netflix customer for 2 years, and you don't realize that Netflix already has all of that? Every time you chose to rent a movie, it gives you a list of movies highly rated by those who highly rated that movie, and a list of movies with the same actor/director/etc.

      But if you want an opinion from Netflix about the best movies of, say, Jim Jarmusch, well, you're just SOL.

      Ratings... They're called ratings... Marked from 1-5 stars. Search for an actor, you'll get a list of all the movies they were in, and the ratings for each one.

      All in all, I'd say Amazon's entry into this market will introduce some good competition, and we're all going to benefit.

      I doubt it. Blockbuster has been enough competition to keep Netflix honest (and help squeeze Wal-mart out of the business). From what I know of Amazon, I suspect they will only fill-in the really low-end market that Walmart was going for, with a really crappy service, but with a price-tag lower than the better services can compete with.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Better website? by crabpeople · · Score: 1

      "Don't get me wrong, I like Netflix, but the recommendations they make for me are almost always off target. On the other hand, Amazon is always presenting me with interesting recommendations on music and books."

      I feel alot safer if the company thats marketing to me cant guess that i will require cornflakes next tuesday at 7:15 am PST. Do you really want corporations to be acurately prediciting when and what you should be consuming? why would you want a company, driven to assist you by purely financial urges, recomending your purchases to you? thats why you make friends that have similar interests. if your not social, you can read beelogs and reviews and shit. the last thing i want is the store telling me what to buy and me becoming complacent enough to thank them as they rob me...
      amazon is pure evil

      --
      I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  43. DVD Rental Will Soon be Obsolete by north.coaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Meanwhile, the cable companies continue to deploy video on demand. And it looks like TiVo will soon offer content programming downloads via the web. Why would I want to rent DVDs?

    1. Re:DVD Rental Will Soon be Obsolete by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment but I'm not certain about the specifics. Others indicate that cable company VOD has been the victim of mediocre execution (poor selection, etc) and it's hard to predict how well TiVo will innovate with the constant threat of lawsuits.

      But the overall issue of DVD rental whether mediated by the internet or otherwise is how remarkably retrograde it is. Sort of like the surge in the fax and fax modem market as email started to grow in the 90's. Since Amazon is in the business of moving boxes it makes sense for them. But the future most certainly belongs to electronic delivery. I suppose this means the future is going to take that much longer to arrive.

      A slightly different interpretation is that Amazon is aggressively planning for online delivery of video but believes that market will depend on having a large physical delivery organization in place first, much like NetFlix and its flirting with the online delivery market.

      I think it would be amusing if Apple outflanks all of them with an online video store similar to iTMS which delivers HD streams using H.264 to get high quality and less extravagent bitrates. That would be better than DVD quality and really instant gratification. Already with QuickTime 7 they have made the locally cached content less easily read than previous versions of QuickTime so secure delivery (at least at iTMS level) may feasible.

      Among other issues holding back this possibility is providing a sufficiently comforting security blanket for Hollywood, having enough people with sufficiently powerful processors to decode H.264, and a nerdless connection to that large HD screen.

    2. Re:DVD Rental Will Soon be Obsolete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had digital cable with VOD, both free and PPV, for about 2 years. I've used it, as far as I can recall, twice: once to watch a couple eps of Dead Like Me [which I later got on DVD], and once to watch some cheesy Skinemax flick.
      I have been with either Netflix or BBO for probably four years combined, and love the service.
      I can get any of ~40,000 titles using them. VOD has maybe 400 at any time, and they're either dozens of episodes of a series I either like or don't like, or movies--primarily 'recent hits'.
      I'm more into anime and tv series, and the rental services do me right in that regard.
      Convenience--easy to manage the queue.
      Price--'buffet' style renting means I can send something back if I don't like it, without feeling guilty or wasteful.
      Selection--they each have hundreds of titles I have never seen at a B&M.
      Flexibility--bring a dvd in the car or plane while traveling, or to a friend's house [or lend it to them]. Can't do that with VoD.
      I'm not knocking VoD, I love the concept--I just don't think the offering is where it needs to be yet, and for me, NF and BBO are much more suitable.

  44. Hopefully they'll bring it to Canada by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

    Since Amazon have already shown they're not entirely US-centric by doing DVD rentals in the UK and Germany, it'd be nice if they brought it up here too.

    Canadians like movies too!

    --
    Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  45. And the next article will be... by B11 · · Score: 1

    Netflix sues Amazon for violating its patent on mail-delivered DVD rentals. (After the dupe of this article of course.)

    --
    insert inflammatory anti-microsoft comment here
  46. No. Not haiku, senryu by Mr+Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    http://www.phenry.org/junkdrawer/haiku/

    Consider NoMoreNicksLeft,
    Of humor, he was bereft,
    He tried a haiku
    And failed, as will you
    So go back to your job of dick theft

    Now in the case of Amazon.com
    and whether their product will bomb.
    It may work, you see
    For you and for me,
    But will it appeal to your Mom?

  47. Bogus job postings to mislead competitors? by noidentity · · Score: 1

    This came to mind. Not necessarily the case here, but predicting a company's future actions based on job postings seems common.

    1. Submit bogus job openings
    2. Observe competitors think they know what you're up to
    3. Profit?
  48. That is why they will loose by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    They already operate distribution centers in several locations around the US

    That is true. And that's how Netflix started.

    But then they realized that for timley delivery of movies, you really need hundreds of distribution centers, not several. Hundreds may be exaggerating a little bit, but Netflix definatley has more than several.

    The ones who can get you the widest selection fastest wins. The only thing Amazon might offer in competition over Walmart (which did not fare well against Netflix) is perhaps a better web UI and more customer visits. But Netflix already has a good UI and an accurate customer rating database (Amazon knows what you bought [from them] but not who you bought it for an generally not how much you liked it).

    Don't forget Netflix is also in partnership with Best Buy, which gives them a pretty good ongoing new customer base. I don't think they have to worry about Amazon overmuch, especially if Amazon is just now hiring programmers!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:That is why they will loose by badasscat · · Score: 1

      But then they realized that for timley delivery of movies, you really need hundreds of distribution centers, not several. Hundreds may be exaggerating a little bit, but Netflix definatley has more than several.

      In fact, ideally you need enough distribution centers to cover the entire country with one-day service. Netflix doesn't have that - you get to a certain point and you're spending a huge amount of money for a few people in rural areas - but they have about 90% coverage at this point.

      Then you have to consider that not only do you have to maintain all those distribution centers, but to make them useful you have to actually make sure you have inventory at all of them at all times. This is a huge logistical headache, because not every center is going to have the same amount of space, the same number of customers, and you have to be retiring old discs at the same time as you're adding new ones and trying to keep things balanced out. I've noticed Netflix doing something kinda neat, though, which is occasionally putting a different return address on my envelope than the center it shipped from. This is not really a speedy way of transferring merchandise around, but it is cheap (i.e. no extra shipping fees for them).

      But those are the kinds of little things that a company just getting started in the business won't think of, and it's why Netflix has the clear advantage. A company with four million subscribers and what, six years in the business now definitely has an advantage over a company that's only ever dealt with traditional retail.

      And anyway, I don't think Amazon has nearly enough distribution centers yet. The closest one to NYC, for example, is in PA. That's a two-day trip by the USPS, which means four days minimum round-trip. That's unacceptable for this type of service. You'd be lucky to send a movie back on Monday and have a new one by the weekend, which is really the benchmark, I think.

    2. Re:That is why they will loose by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Price matters too, of course. I watch a handful of movies a month, and for me, Blockbuster.com is a better deal. It's $15 a month (cheaper than NetFlix), and I get 2 free in-store rental coupons for those spur-of-the-moment times. I'm content enough with 3 at a time that I find I don't really care about the extra couple days it takes to get a new one. I just keep 2 in transit and watch the third.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    3. Re:That is why they will loose by badmammajamma · · Score: 1

      "But then they realized that for timley delivery of movies, you really need hundreds of distribution centers, not several. Hundreds may be exaggerating a little bit, but Netflix definatley has more than several."

      Netflix has about 35 distribution centers. There's one in or very near every major city in the United States. With that distribution they can provide 1 day turnaround time to the vast majority of the population.

      I agree, I don't think they have to worry about Amazon much. Netflix has already lowered their prices and offers quite a deal I think.

      --
      Any man who afflicts the human race with ideas must be prepared to see them misunderstood. -- H. L. Mencken
  49. Market research and shooting your mouth off by jfengel · · Score: 1

    As compared to what?

    Presumably as compared to other entertainment alternatives. It depends a lot on how many movies you want to watch per month. You need to rent more than one disk a week to make it comparable to dropping by the video store (depending on how close they are, how much you mind returning movies, etc.)

    But if you instead spent $60 on a video game and then spent three months playing it, you break even. Or you can buy several books. Hell, going outside is free.

    You're right that Slashdotters often have a strange notion of "value". For example, many declared $.99 per song from iTMS too much based on absolutely no market data. Sure, they'd RATHER pay less, but that's kind of a no-brainer. At least in the iTMS case, people seem to be reasonably content for a buck a song. The question is, how elastic is your entertainment dollar?

    Me, I get around 80 disks a year from Netflix, which would cost $300 at the video store compared to $240 from Netflix. A good savings, but not inordinate. It means I get to see stuff I wouldn't take a chance on otherwise; I wouldn't spend even $240 at Blockbuster if I had to take some of those risks.

  50. A reason Amazon may not succeed by jvagner · · Score: 1

    is they don't know how to design a good-looking and easy to use website. Netflix's site is nearly perfect, but Amazon's pages are too complicated, tie in to too many things, and finding your way around can be too circuitious.

    I'll admit they've improved a lot recently (their new book pages are great), but I think they've got too much historical cruft in the mix to be truly committed to good, simple interface design.

  51. Amazon Worker == SCO Worker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon is becoming just as disgusting as SCO has been regarding their patents. They should be shown the same disdain as a SCO worker today.

  52. Rocket Fueled Video Addiction. . ! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Wow. To get full value from my $17.99 per month subscription, I have to force feed myself a minimum of three movies a month forever! Stress! ArgH! Must visit website. Mst watch moveiss. . . Hlp. Where did I put that return envelope. Go out tonight with friends? Can't! Must watch movies! What's good? Who cares! Must make minimum allotment or face vague penalty of paying weird premium for weird disk in mail service.

    Okay.

    To be fair, the Netflix model sounds like a pretty good deal for people whose lives happen to circulate around watching lots and lots of movies. I've been there, and it can be a lot of fun when you're in that head-space.

    But for me, it sounds like WAY too much trouble. --Like working for a company which gives you a pager and has you on-call 24/7. Knowing that I MUST watch 3 movies at some point during the month seems very stressful to me. I'd rather be able to get a movie when I feel like it and not feel that it is yet another item on my To Do list.

    I can happily go for a couple of months without ever watching a DVD, and then I'll blow several nights in a row consuming something which catches my interest, (like the ill-fated Bruce Campbell TV Western series, "Brisco County Jr." --Which was unbelievably cool, but is only available from my friend who downloaded pirate copies from the web and burned them to disk for me because the series was never officially released.). --And then I'll happily watch nothing for another three months.

    Perhaps Netflix could offer non-member limited rental packages with no deadlines on some of those funky single-use disks. --Subscriptions bother me. I don't like feeling 'obligated' to do anything, particularly with regard to my free time activities. Though, it seems to me that the rent-a-DVD-by-mail business model depends rather heavily on the various forms of psychological momentum subscriptions create, so I somehow doubt short term purchases will come about.


    -FL

    1. Re:Rocket Fueled Video Addiction. . ! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I had this fear too. What helped was I'd place a TV show in my queue and then 2 movies. After work I'd watch the TV show, 1 hour of my time. On my days off I watch the movies. Works out pretty well.
      +++
      Cache In, Trash Out!

    2. Re:Rocket Fueled Video Addiction. . ! by FCP · · Score: 1

      Looks like the rent-by-mail model is expensive for people who want few movies, while nothing is going to be fast enough for serious movie junkies. It works great for us because we have enough time for 3-5 movies/wk due to not watching any other TV. My turnaround time on DVDs from Netflix is blindingly fast by USPS standards, usually two days between putting a disk in our mailbox outgoing and delivery of the replacement.

      --
      .plan: file not found
    3. Re:Rocket Fueled Video Addiction. . ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have a really tough life if all it takes to stress you out is the idea of having to watch 3 movies in a month.

  53. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lemme know which broadband you speak of. 99% of america is still stuck on shit ass 4mbit cable or worse yet, most of the midwest has qwest who offers that sweet 256kbit DSL for 20$ a month. I'd know, all 10 of the open access wireless points in my apartment are using it.

    Now, let me know how exactly you think anyone is going to be downloading a 6GB+ DVD to watch "on demand". If by "on demand" you mean "it'd be faster to ship it in the mail". Ya, maybe.

    1. Re:Insightful? by canolecaptain · · Score: 1

      So you have to wait a few hours for it to start - no big deal. The provider could initially have an option to lower the quality for a smaller TV set to deliver it faster (4 gig->800meg). My 4Meg cable is plenty fast enough for this, and cable providers can crank that up if they wanted to. It's far better than waiting 2-4 days for the DVD to arrive, then you watch it, send it back, and wait for another 2-4 day round trip for the next flick. And that's if you watch it the day you get it. Even with 3 movies (dropped Blockbuster because they were too slow and switched to Intelliflix), I find that my family watches them when it's convenient for us, which generally groups them during weekends. If I could tell the service provider to start the download in the morning and have it ready when I returned from work, I'd be perfectly happy.

      As far as infrastructure, Europe is already doing this, and the US is slowly catching up. If you'll look at the published numbers, 30+% of the US population can now get 1+mbps broadband if they want to (mostly metropolitan but so what). If that's not good enough, how about 15mbps? I work for a telco equipment provider that enables rural telcos to provide roughly 15mbps (ADSL2+) to home users. We're shipping this to parts of the US now, and have customers on the line for more. And, we have lots of competitors desiring to do the same, so it's only a matter of time (ie: this year and next) before -lots- more of it is available via DSL, Fiber, Cable, heck include WiMax too.

      By late next year, enough -people-, not regions, will be -able-(infrastructure) to download movies to a 'supported' platform that it will result in a high enough ROI for serious business investment. Thus, by mid to late next year, these VoIP (video over IP) solutions (that are shipping now by the way to early adopters) will finally become mainstream.

  54. peerflix by thatedeguy · · Score: 1

    Amazon recently rolled out peerflix, or has done some advertising for it in any case. It's a dvd trading service. Think P2P for DVD's. Perhaps this is what they are hiring for?

  55. Amazon owns IMDB too. by MDMurphy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazon bought IMDB a while back, and luckily, hasn't screwed it up. The IMDB is the best source for movie and TV info online. When Amazon bought it, the only obvious change was making the "buy it" link in the upper left corner always point to Amazon.

    If they tie it in with the IMDB, that would be pretty handy. Search for "Virginia Madsen" and you see a list of all her movies, with boxes next to the ones available for rental. Tick the ones you want and they get added to your queue.
    This is also a plus since you could search with IMDB for any movie, not just the ones they stock. Want a movie that isn't out on DVD yet? Add it to a wish list.

    Amazon also has the setup with used DVDs ( and books ) to ofer deals if you want to buy the movies instead of, or after, renting them. I'd expect them to let you know how long your wait will be for a rental while offering a shorted length if you want to buy one now.

    Amazon also didn't pump up the IPO by paying spammers like Netflix did. Netflix will always be tainted by that.

    1. Re:Amazon owns IMDB too. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Amazon bought IMDB a while back, and luckily, hasn't screwed it up.

      So, to you, it's not ruining IMBD by including MASSIVELY LARGE banners on the site, making (additional) reviews and all of the forums off-limit to non-registered users, and contining to restrict more and more of the site...

      No, Amazon is doing quite a good job ruining IMDB. They just haven't done it all at once.

      If they tie it in with the IMDB, that would be pretty handy. Search for "Virginia Madsen" and you see a list of all her movies

      Netflix already has exactly that same system in-place. It's better than IMDB IMHO just because it has a lot more useful info, trailers, etc. Netflix doesn't have as many obscure movies in it's database as IMDB, but they really don't need to.

      Want a movie that isn't out on DVD yet? Add it to a wish list.

      Netflix also already does that. There is a "Movies Awaiting Release" queue.

      Amazon also has the setup with used DVDs ( and books ) to ofer deals if you want to buy the movies instead of, or after, renting them.

      Amazon doesn't sell used anything. They have a section where 3rd parties can sell used/new items, but Amazon doesn't have much control over that, and they'd be crazy to make that a centerpiece of their business. Many of them are selling illegal copies, Amazon has no idea how much inventory they have, etc.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Amazon owns IMDB too. by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can whine about banners. But it hasn't kept you off Slashdot. Web sites aren't free, even if you don't pay for them directly. I just did a quick peek and a movie details page has less screen real estate showing ads than Slashdot's main page.

      Restriction to posting to registered users, a good idea in my book. Wikipedia has issues with just any yahoo posting things. A commercial site can't have things as open as usenet

      Not listing obscure movies isn't what Netflix is about, it's not listing something they don't plan to offer. A movie isn't obscure just because it isn't out on DVD.

      I know Amazon doesn't sell used anything, never said it did. But the 3rd party used articles aren't in some separate section. When you search for an item on Amazon you'll be presented with options for new and used.

      I'm probably replying to a Netflix troll, especially since they didn't address Netflix and their SPAM background. That's a stink I'll never be able to get over, but with what Amazon has in place already, I wouldn't have to give up much, if any, while avoiding a tainted company like Netflix.

    3. Re:Amazon owns IMDB too. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Restriction to posting to registered users, a good idea in my book.

      No, no, no!!! They aren't just restricting posting. You can't even READ COMMENTS without having an account.

      I'm probably replying to a Netflix troll, especially since they didn't address Netflix and their SPAM background.

      I see. Anyone neglecting to respond to one single issue you made therefore makes them a troll.

      You know something, I don't think you replied to all the points I made. I guess you must be a troll.

      The reason I didn't reply to your SPAM claims is because:

          A) I've never seen any such spam
          B) I've never heard of Netflix spam
          C) A seach on Google finds very, very few cases of Netflix spam
          D) In those few cases, it was almost certainly some 3rd party taking advantage of Netflix's perfectly benign Affiliate system

      To me, you sound like an Anit-Netflix troll.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  56. Monthly Cap by JCY2K · · Score: 1

    From the article: 'short delivery times have forced the company to cap flat-fee rentals at six per month... Customers can rent additional titles for an extra fee.' If they tried to pull that crap, Netflix would get all but every one of amazon's customers. The point of this is no rental cap. Silly amazon.com.

  57. Great ... more complicated web pages by joelsanda · · Score: 1

    I've been online since the 300 baud modem and I've rarely come across an online resource as overloaded and cluttered as amazon.com. Their site already pounds people with advertising. I could care less a guy in Toledo bought a gas grill when he bought the same book title I just added to my cart. At one time I was a regular Amazon customer and would surf their site just to find something interesting for a gift. But now? They will have to start screening users based upon their connection speed.

    --
    The Luddites were ahead of their time.
  58. No way in hell. by DogDude · · Score: 1

    DVD's: No ads. Only content that you want to watch. Not paying the cable companies. Those are the main reasons that there's no cable TV, broadcast TV, satellite TV, or TV programming of any kind, whatsoever in my house (unless it's on a DVD, of course).

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:No way in hell. by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      There are ads on DVD's now, you know... the ones that start playing as soon as you put the dvd in..

  59. I can think of one advantage Amazon might have by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    they probably already have thousands of DVDs in stock from customer returns, many of which cannot be returned to the distributor. Why not turn around and rent these out and realize some profit on them instead of writing them off?

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    1. Re:I can think of one advantage Amazon might have by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      They probably won't have licenses to rent those DVDs.
      +++
        My last.fm page

  60. Walmart by CrashRoX · · Score: 1

    Everyone keeps mentioning that amazon has dist centers. Well what about Walmart? Its not like they dont have enough locations, companies, money and customers. They seemed to have failed in a matter of weeks. I encourage the competition. The entrance of Blockbuster has lowered industry prices. With an entrance from Amazon, price should drop even more. I wish them luck.

  61. One impressed customer.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I signed up for the rental in the UK, the 7.99 one. I added some dvd's to my list, out of 15 only 2 had 'short wait' the others were available straight away. I signed up about midday yesterday, they were dispatched at 9pm and arrived through my letterbox at 10am this morning.

    Amazon and Royal Mail have surpassed themselves this time!

  62. Blockbuster - Killer App by Content-Free · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster could trump both Amazon and Netflix with a monthly subsciption service that allows any combination of either mail-in or in-store rentals. Amazon and Netflix can't touch the instant gratification market with their current business model. The icing on the cake would be for Blockbuster to put in place a very consumer-friendly privacy policy (i.e., so consumers had confidence that their viewing habits weren't beeing sold).

  63. The Zero-Cost solution by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My wife and I have recently hit on a great, free source of DVD's - the Library. For those who haven't been there in a while, check out your local branch and you might be surprised at what's available. We just picked up Donnie Darko, Kinsey, and Lost in Translation the other day. Since we take the kids there once a week to pick up kid's movies and books, we grab a couple for ourselves and when you're on a tight budget, free entertainment is a major bonus...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  64. Poor patent office worker by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 1

    How much time before we see a "A way to rent movie with one click", "A way to post DVD back in one step", "A way to watch DVD in one viewing" patent surfacing?

  65. No exaggeration by cryptochrome · · Score: 1

    I know for a fact I've been throttled. The first couple of months they were great... then suddenly my 3-day turnaround time went to 7-days with no explanation... somehow everything I sent in the mail was taking longer to get there and when they did get the disks they took longer to process and get here. It would have pissed me off a lot less if they didn't flat out lie to me about it being the Post Office's fault and garbage like that. There are whole websites devoted to this subject. Unlimited rentals my ass.

    The second Amazon's service goes into effect, assuming they have a decent anime and out-of-print DVD selection, I'm switching. Also Amazon, the ability to rent games in addition to movies would be awesome, and something Netflix doesn't offer.

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  66. Long Live NETFLIX! by pondster · · Score: 1

    OK maybe not that bad....Anywho I have tried the other services and nothing matches the service of netflix. I tried walmart - that sucked - I gave BLOCKBUSTER 3 tries! and each time was worst than the previous. The last time I tried blockbuster they lost a movie - I complained so they sent a replacement. After 3 weeks I decided to quit blockbuster due to extremly long wait times for processing and recieving movies. The day after I quit they send me an email stating that they had not recieved my last set of movies and if they did not by a certain date I would be charged $60+ dollars!!! I already mailed them back - and knowing their terrible processing I got worried. Emailed another another complaint on how rude their letter was (and it was really worded quite rude) - so I dont get any response back whatsoever except that they recieved my movies (2 weeks after I sent them back) So now remember that movie they lost - I recieved it the week I sent my last batch back after I quit. Being an honest person I simply put the movie back in the mail (after flipping the cover) sending it back to them. 3 months later I get an email stating they recieved my movie and if I add to my que they can send my next movie! So in response to Amazon setting up - good for them but I went through enough agony to know my home lies with netflix - I dont mind the extra costs as long as I am happy and content.

  67. Re:Infinite Resources, Massive Distribution Networ by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 0

    "Not to mention how likely it is that someone will purchase a DVD they rented using the Amazon service."

    Which is not bloody likely. People would use the service because they don't want to buy DVDs.

    As for the "early adopter" argument, Netflix has been around how long? Five or more years? What's "early" about that? They are well established and booming. Amazon will be able to offer NOTHING that netflix doesn't already have. As for economies of scale, Netflix already lowered their monthly three-move rate from $21.95 to $17.95 a long time ago to meet the competition head on (and ulitmately crush them). They can and will do the same with Amazon if they try to rent at a loss.

    --
    The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
  68. on-demand movie library instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I compare the online dvd rental business with the age of the laser disk...to pass the time until something better comes along. Just give me pay-per-view from a movie library instead of the current 5-10 rotating movie selection the cable providers offer.

  69. Blockbuster's flaw by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    I did the same as you - was a netflix subscriber, then switched to blockbuster because I could go in store and get the movies whenever I wanted.

    I did this for about 5 months.

    I then resigned with netflix.

    Why? Because as more and more of blockbuster's customers went to the unlimited subscription, I was no longer able to rent ANY new releases. I literally had to wait over 2 weeks for a new movie at one point.

    Netflix has similar issues, but at least you can wait in a queue for a movie, rather than leave it to pure luck that someone is returning a video that you want in the few minutes that you're in the blockbuster store.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  70. BAD MOVE by pablo_max · · Score: 0

    Really, even netflix is moving away from this. The future is downloads. It's plain as day. When I want to watch a movie, I want to see it NOW..not two days later. I dont want to walk to my mailbox.
    You will see companies like Motorola release more web capable set top boxes to allow people to download these movies and watch them on TV from companies other then their TV provider.

  71. book rental by huphtur · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i wonder if its possible to do book rental and if amazon will ever do this?

    1. Re:book rental by proxima · · Score: 1

      i wonder if its possible to do book rental and if amazon will ever do this?

      I doubt it, for a few reasons. First, shipping on a book is significantly more expensive than DVDs. Media mail is the cheapest way in the US, and it's something like $1.42/book for a much slower service than priority mail. Netflix gets you DVDs within a day or two of shipping them by using a combination of priority mail and nearby distribution centers.
       
      The second reason is similar, and that is of total cost/revenue. Let's assume (but this is probably optimistic) that the higher shipping cost (nearly $3/book for both directions) is offset by the slower turnover (since people tend to spend longer to read a book than watch a movie). Still, given the reasonable rate of 4 books/month, your monthly fee would have to be quite low to entice people to choose it over buying books used or going to the library. If the fee is too low, it won't cover the rather substantial overhead of dealing with all the other costs of storage, purchasing new books, etc.

      If, for whatever reason, the library isn't working well for you personally, there are alternatives. My wife is big into PaperBackSwap which has you mailing books you own to others and in turn other users mail you books back. You can use this either to get rid of books you're no longer interested in and get ones you really are, or use it like a rather expensive rental system. As long as you like the selection, it'd probably be cheaper for you than to try to use a company looking to make profit.

      --
      "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
  72. Re:unlimited online rentals !!!!??? by Kijori · · Score: 1

    'Unlimited' doesn't mean the same thing as infinite. Rather than meaning that there is some sort of never-ending DVD supply chain in their warehouses, it just means that there is no set limit for the number of DVDs you can rent, although obviously it isn't possible to rent an infinite number.

  73. What Amazon Needs: Customer Service by precogpunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This has been said before but Amazon has a recommendation engine that's light years ahead of what Netflix has. I've been an Amazon customer for longer, have bought more product from them, and so has everyone else. Even after rating 300 movies and reviewing several Netflix makes the stupidest movie recommendations while Amazon prove insightful most of the time.

    Amazon has the distribution, but also the ability to cross-sell a lot more than Netflix. It's probably a lot easier for them to sell you the movie if you rent it and like it. They have better promotional opportunities, like including free rental coupons if you buy DVDs.

    The one thing Amazon doesn't have going for it is customer service. Have you ever had a problem with your order? One time someone sent me a gift from my wish list, they could not select the address it was shipped to, and it got lost. It was a complete headache trying to resolve the issue and contact their customer support. Netflix, on the other hand, has amazed me with how good their service is. One time I sent my own DVD back instead of the rental, so I emailed them, and they managed to find it and mail it back to me a couple of weeks later. I also had a real, live, human who answered the email. Unless Amazon shows improvement I'll be sticking with Netflix.

    1. Re:What Amazon Needs: Customer Service by pianophile · · Score: 1

      It was a complete headache trying to resolve the issue and contact their customer support

      Did you call them? 1-800-201-7575

      --

      'Your brain is God.' -- Dr. Timothy Leary
  74. Think about it LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would need to rent the book for days or weeks, and you would inevitably damage the book or otherwise depreciate it much more than a DVD.

    Also, DVDs can be duped cheaply and on demand, but not books.

  75. A Poem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the man who forks out for the rent,
    yet sees it twisted to others' own ends;
    say don't commandeer,
    my viewing, my dear,
    for a bitchslap often offends.

  76. "Throttling" conspiracy theory? by hatless · · Score: 1

    I live in a city with a Netflix depot. My turnaround times for all but one of the movies I've rented has been 2 business days. Mail one back on Monday, the next one's in my mailbox Wednesday. The one exception took a third day.

    It's theoretically possible that Netflix does throttle customers, but the person with the rant and the Javascript calculator isn't even basing it on personal observation or anyone's anecdotes. They're just extrapolating from some business-news quote they read somewhere that Netflix *must* be slowing turnaround times to limit people to a monthly rental volume that doesn't break $2/DVD. Except that nobody's observing this in real life.

    1. Re:"Throttling" conspiracy theory? by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I know, I live out in rural upstate NY. I have netflix, and we always turn around the movies the day after we get them in the summer (My dad is retired and my sister and I on summer break - not a lot to do out here, you figure it out).

      We have the 5 out at a time, I got 24 movies last month - at a cost of ~ $1.45 per movie. Not bad really, though of course I'd love to get 5 movies every 3 days, it's not doable with business day processing (totally understandable, netflix is a business, they work mon-fri). And, this is far cheaper than DVD rental costs at local stores - which for us are minimum of 20 miles away. Figure in gas and boom, big savings.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
  77. Ships in 24 hours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about the rest of you, but whenever I go to Amazon they always say "Ships in 24 hours" and then they end up shipping three to five days later.

    I currently use Netfix and will continue inthat they have shown they can deliver a quick turn around and Amazon is just too big to do anything fast anymore.

  78. Patent Time by Nefarious420 · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't Netflix be patenting a system to keep track of movies incoming/outgoing as well as recommendation to moves you might like? I know Netflix has been offering this since I used the service back in the olden days, I believe even prior to Amazons patents on said technology. Why fight competition with marketing when you can just create a dozen patents and sue your competition into oblivioun of file Cease and Desist orders.

  79. Gasp! by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

    Who could've seen this coming? Apparantly not NetFlix...

  80. Netflix getting into real estate? by realityfighter · · Score: 1

    "Netflix seems to have a stronghold on the market"

    That's funny, I thought they just rented DVDs.

    --
    A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
  81. Not a chance by SnapperHead · · Score: 1

    I signed up for Netflix about 2 months ago and I love it. My GF uses Blockbuster, which doesn't have as wide of a selection.

    I will never use amazon because of there patents. I would seriously hope the rest of the /. crew wouldn't either.

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
  82. Netflix has other, cheaper plans by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    You can get two at a time for $15 a month, or cheaper plans still (if you don't mind a monthly limit).

    If I could walk to a Blockbuster I might give thier plan a thought, but for me I never find going to a Bockbuster more convienient than mail and I really like the wide variety Netflix offers.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  83. Funny by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    Because I remember a story similar to this on Slashdot many years ago. It was when the old brick-and-mortar store, "Barnes And Noble" decided to take on Amazon in the online world. Lots of the same arguments were there, especially the "they'll just lower prices and put Amazon out of business" one.

    So, we'll see. Personally, I'd bet on the one that has the market already.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  84. Nexflix is Accurate these days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, it's so accurate with recomendations it almost always knows what rating i'm going to give a movie before i even rate it. And I watch all kinds of movies.

  85. I will be among the first customers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be among the first customers! Then I will quit after my free trial and never use them again.

    How long till amazon tries to patent sending DVDs through the mail?

  86. Problem: consistently maimed discs by Fastball · · Score: 1

    I'm a fascist when it comes to DVD quality. Never handle them except by their edges. Always put them in their container/sleeve when not in use. Apparently, I'm a lone wolf in this respect, because when I go to any local Blockbuster to rent a DVD, the discs are absolutely fucking maimed. Scratches all over. Some that I would qualify as "cuts." Not scratches, but deep grooves in the disc. People are goddamned animals, and this is proof.

    In contrast, my experience with Blockbuster's mailed discs has been very good. Maybe 1-2 out of each twenty I've rented have been bad. Blockbuster has quickly shipped a new disc when informed of a bad disc.

    Not happy about the price hike to $18/month though. I'm a high volume user, so I'll probably stick with them. For now.

  87. Doesn't work for Blockbuster by sentanta · · Score: 1

    Well after posting a fat loss today, Blockbuster has announced that they are going to be raising the cost of their online DVD rentals. Doesn't seem to be the way to retail supremacy.

    --
    The Big Yuan - tracking mainland China
  88. Re:Infinite Resources, Massive Distribution Networ by kingradar · · Score: 1


    "Which is not bloody likely. People would use the service because they don't want to buy DVDs."

    I'm sorry, but I rent DVDs all the time and occasionally I find one that I like enough to buy. The movie "Brazil" was probably the most recent example.

    As for 'early adopters', I'm sorry but 85%* of Americans have never heard of Netflix. Whereas 85%* of Americans have heard of Blockbuster, and probably 50%* have heard of Amazon. That's what I meant by early adopters.

    Now if you sample the /. crowd, I'm sure those numbers are more like 95%/95%/95%*.

    *Yes I pulled these numbers out of my posterior. The fact is these numbers are close enough to the truth that they illustrate my point.

  89. Re:Psssst Hey Amazon by slickwillie · · Score: 1

    Here's a hint: You could operate on weekends. Yeah, that's right, then the customer wouldn't have a 4-day delay if they returned a disc on Friday.

    YA LISTENING NETFLIX?

    HUH?

  90. BLOCKBUSTER Online: Price Change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This could not have come more timely. I'm a BB-online customer and today I got an email informing that they're raising the 3 at a time plan up to $17.99 (plus tax). So much for price competition!

  91. Netflix = online dvd rentals, Amazon = * by matchboy · · Score: 1

    Recently, I read a brief interview with Derek Sivers of CDBaby and he discussed how he has no intentions of taking on all these great ideas that people send him for the future of CDBaby... such as online radio stations.. and other forms of music related features. He pointed out that CDBaby is an online music store and nothing more. The more you spread yourself, well... you know what can happen. You can grow too quickly and have too many things to manage... or you can be really good at what you do. CDBaby is really good at what they do.

    Netflix is *really* good at what they do.

    When I stick my returning DVD in the mail before 6pm on the weekday, I get the next one in my queue 2 days later. My girlfriend and I have the 3 dvd at a time package and it works great. They are adding new features all the time (RSS feeds of my queue, recommendations, etc)... and now have Friends features. I can find movies that I cannot find at blockbuster or hollywood. I have been a Netflix customer for 3 years now and don't regret a single payment.

    It would take a lot for me to want to switch away from a quality service in favor of a company that tries to get themselves involved in every online market out there.

    Advantage: Netflix. :-)

    --

    Robby Russell
    PLANET ARGON
    Robby on Rails