Slashdot Mirror


Google Lawsuit Exposes Microsoft Offshoring Deal

2old2rockNroll writes "In more news from Microsoft's Google lawsuit, it appears that Ballmer's 2003 trip to China may have had as much to do with Microsoft moving jobs as selling software. It seems that the Chinese are not pleased with the number of jobs being moved to China, and one of Lee's duties was to identify jobs for export. Although hiring in Redmond has slowed, a Microsoft spokesperson admits they are "growing their work force" in China. Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

429 comments

  1. The Top Two Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    on Slashdot are about the same company. *sigh* Go diverse news about technology!

    1. Re:The Top Two Stories by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      Try "involves the same company"... Did you even read the stories?

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    2. Re:The Top Two Stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic?

      The. Article. Is. About. Google. You. Fucking. Douchebag. Moderator.

  2. SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by djupedal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

    How many times do people need to be reminded? Investing in MS is risking having your own money used against you in the marketplace.

    1. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah, yeah... when reading the blurb:

      was merely crocodile tears?

      the response that comes to mind is, "was there ever any doubt?"

      on the other hand, though, they could justifiably (on the own grounds of what they're saying) argue that it's because the US has poor output in terms of CS types that they have no choice but to go abroad in the first place

    2. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The decline of US graduates means an increase in salary since there is less offer and more demand. They don't like that. Therefore, they move to china. Wasn't it obvious?

    3. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, it's very obvious (as are the lurking ms apologists).

      Anyone that holds MS stock is helping the practice of off-shoring as well.

      Good news is, the Chinese aren't fooled by the likes of MS and Wal-Mart, so we can all rest easy knowing at least those two predators are being kept out of the hen-house.

    4. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Based on my direct experience working with products and components whose fabrication has recently been moved to China, the Chinese (who seem to have zero, zippo, no concept of systematic quality systems) aren't bright enough to be fooled.

      This may be a result of the lower-tier nature of the people my company chooses to deal with in China, however. Cheap is cheap no matter where in the world you go.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Cromac · · Score: 1, Troll
      on the other hand, though, they could justifiably (on the own grounds of what they're saying) argue that it's because the US has poor output in terms of CS types that they have no choice but to go abroad in the first place

      Only if you assume that the only qualified workers have CS degrees. Most of the best developers and testers I've worked with either don't have a degree at all or have a degree in some totally unrelated field. Arguing that there aren't enough CS graduates is just an excuse for MS and other companies to try and justify outsourcing.

    6. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - More importantly it points out Bill and Balmer are hyprocrits.
      They cry there aren't enough CS grads, but, do everything they can to lower salaries in the US.

      These Genius's can't see the connection.
      The college student can see Gates moving jobs over seas.
      Assuming college students are bright, then they can see that America doesn't have a future for them as CS majors.

    7. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      "Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

      My take on this was different. IAAFMSE (I am a former Microsoft Employee). Of course Microsoft is going to be outsourcing these jobs. Indeed it is only the possibility of bad publicity that keeps this from happening wholesale at the moment.

      Now the decline of the US in computer technology would be bad news for Microsoft even so. If the main tech startups are in California, then it is easy for them to keep tabs on the competition and in some cases look for ways to steal IP (DEC, etc.), etc. If the new research is being done in foreign countries and by foreign countries, Microsoft will likely find the foreign governments less sympathetic, and will have a harder time keeping track of the competition from their corporate headquarters in Redmond.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    8. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Anyone that holds MS stock is helping the practice of off-shoring as well.

      So? Is this Slashdot home of the net libertarians or has someone pharmed the site and redirected me to the Teamsters site?

      Computer driven automation puts hundreds of thousands of blue collar workers out of jobs each year, far more than are put out of work due to outsourcing. So now the boot is on the other foot and jobs are somewhat tight we have computer nerds demanding protectionism???

      Microsoft has a worldwide sales base. Most of its employees are concentrated in the US. That is not a sustainable situation. It is not simply a question of the balance of payments, the principle concern of India and China is to establish their own indigenous high tech industries.

      Outsourcing is simply an arbitrage game and arbitrage rarely lasts for very long. In the medium term there will be a re-alignment of the currencies and the cost benefits to outsourcing will diminish.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    9. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fooled?

      Could it be that MS and Wal-Mart have been fooled by the Chinese?

      If China decides to invade Taiwan, all they have to do is flip a switch to shut off the US supply of goods and use the resources paid for by the American companies to fund and supply their war effort.

      15 years ago they ran over their own people with tanks, the government hasn't change.

    10. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Basehart · · Score: 3, Funny

      "IAAFMSE (I am a former Microsoft Employee)"

      HTFTNA. IBSTUTIFWIRTAFME. (Hey, thanks for the new acronym. I'll be sure to use that in future whenever I'm referring to a former microsoft employee).

    11. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by CodeBuster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the medium term there will be a re-alignment of the currencies and the cost benefits to outsourcing will diminish.

      This would be true if China was a free market democracy, but they are not, they are a free market communism. The Chinese people, with the exception of the elites, are the ones who are really getting screwed by the fixed currency policies, but there is nothing that they can do about it because China is not a free society and the government kills or imprisons anyone who complains or speaks out. I remember reading in a recent story that a sign on a factory wall in China read something to the effect of, "Work hard today or else you will have to work hard tomorrow to find a new job," which implies, none to subtly, that if you complain about the wages or don't want to work 16 hours per day then you get lost because they have 100 more peasants in the countryside who they can bus in to take your place for $2 per day. The Chinese workers are slaves in everything but name because they have no power to effect any changes in national policy and the policy of China right now is to manipulate their currency to keep their export markets growing while using the surpluses to outbid with large premiums when buying foreign oil assets. There is no economic justification for the takeover bids that the Chinese oil companies are making...no rational company would pay a 20% premium on assets in a takeover bid...UNLESS they were backed with government money to secure strategic assets for the military which is exactly what is happening in China. The Chinese are gearing up for a hostile takeover of Taiwan and possibly a war with the US if we attempt to intervene, as we are obligated to by our treaties with Taiwan. The point is that a readjustment cannot occur as long as the totalitarian government in China continues to enslave their people to distort the market for their own strategic, geopolitical, and military purposes.

    12. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      they are a free market communism

      Properly known as "Fascism".

    13. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by SuperRushman · · Score: 1

      Absolutlely they were crocodile tears. It is so ironic that Billy Bob Gates will be hiring the Chinese engineers that will likely rob, steal and pilfer any Microsoft code that is worth anything and a new Chinasoft will emerge to compete. Gates will be losing now not only to Google, but now China Inc. We will see just how "cheap" Chinese really is.

    14. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by Cromac · · Score: 1

      Troll huh, obviously Slashdot has at least some moderators with degrees who think their piece if paper is worth more than something used to wipe their ass. They're probably just upset that they can't get hired because their degree qualifies them to flip burgers and nothing else.

    15. Re:SM's 'duh' moment of the week... by thinkwise · · Score: 1

      dude MS Sells more than 60% of its products in asia. what do you say about it!!

  3. Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by BluRBD!E · · Score: 5, Insightful

    why is this significant again? Companies offshore all the time. Hell, some companies move their headquarters to different continents.

    1. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by BFaucet · · Score: 0

      Well I'm sure a lot of CS degree holders in here would like to be able to get work in the US. Not to have to move to China or India to get a tech job.

      Exporting jobs is just plain bad for any economy. It reduces jobs and increases the money flow out of the country. The US is experiencing some serious economic draining ATM.

      Linux doesn't really have this economic effect attached to it. Even if you buy a distro, you can buy the distro(s) made in your country.

      --
      -Derick
    2. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by danharan · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Your economy is in sad shape, and can't be sustained very long.

      Microsoft is probably still an overall benefit, as it is likely bringing more money in than sending abroad.

      Your balance of trade and deficit issues boggle the imagination- but MS is the least of your worries there.

      --
      Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
    3. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Well I'm sure a lot of CS degree holders in here would like to be able to get work in the US. Not to have to move to China or India to get a tech job.

      I don't know about the US because I'm in the UK but having a degree doesn't mean much these days. You're sold it as proof you can perform, but frankly that's a load of toss for most degrees. You come out with some academic idea of how things should be done without any real world experience. When hiring I've never looked at anyone's qualifications, but at their experience. Even when looking to take on junior roles, those suitable for people just out of college I've asked them what they've done outside of their school work, looked for web sites they've "developed", or code they've written. I've yet to see a degree that will instil anything I've wanted from a candidate other than a rudimentary idea of OO design and some half assed attempt at lifecycle methodologies.

      University degrees do not entitle you to a job and if you're one of the people that treat them as such I suggest you get a large grip on reality. No-one owes you anything.

    4. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Exporting jobs is just plain bad for any economy. It reduces jobs and increases the money flow out of the country. The US is experiencing some serious economic draining ATM.

      Studied Macro-economics long ago. The academic answer is not really always the case, because it frees up resources (people) in one economy to do what they are better at or what is more profitable.

      If she export a thousand jobs to China for making ping-pong balls and we convert our thousand workers to something else (say making foobar which goes for $100 each and each worker can make 3 of in an hour), it can be a win/win sitiation - their economies get 1000 more jobs that didn't exist before and we maximize the potential of our workforce.

      Of course, I wonder if economic academics figure in the cost of building up China and other countries (competition for resources such as oil, future competition in the marketplace, etcetera).

    5. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by malkavian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take a long hard look at what kind of degree to what kind of role.
      I've done a lot of hiring work in the past, and will tell you straight that a degree gives you a huge level of credibility over someone who claims "x years of experience".
      The work market as is, those claims are almost invariably exaggerated.
      Which leaves either a work portfolio (which means you need someone with both time and qualification to audit it, and ensure it's actually their own work), or some form of accredited certification that they are capable.
      Now, I've done a degree (two actually), AND got commercial certification.
      From the two of those, I'll have to say that the commercial offering will let you push the buttons with a minimal knowledge of what is really happening behind the scenes. It leaves the person, if they're relying on this as their main source of info, woefully unprepared for the real world where things exist in heterogenous enviornments, and problems actually occur.
      Which leaves a University degree.
      Yes, it says that the person knows a lot in theory, but fresh out of Uni, they have little practical application of it yet.
      However, what is says is they understand WHY things work in their discipline, and can work it out with a book, and a very good grounding in first principles.
      In 95%+ of cases, they rapidly outstrip the 'experience only' people across a broad spectrum of understanding. Degrees train you how to learn, not spoon feed you a few lines that you quote back by rote.
      Is a degree a 'guarantee of a job'? Not at all these days. Will it give you a head and shoulders leap over someone with only experience? Absolutely.
      If someone working for me couldn't justify why they'd brought someone on board with experience only, over someone with experience plus degree, I'd want a very good reason as to why. Otherwise they'd find their ability to make any decision of responsibility removed sharpish.

    6. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by cool_number_9 · · Score: 1
      University degrees do not entitle you to a job and if you're one of the people that treat them as such I suggest you get a large grip on reality. No-one owes you anything.

      Exactly! When I graduated with a M.Sc. in Applied Physics I could not find a suitable job, so I had to take lesser jobs for two years before getting accepted for a research position. Not that those two years were any less fun, but a lot of M.Sc. graduates expect high paying jobs, which in this day and age is unrealistic.

      Consequently, I advise all the students I meet to take it easy, use all the money and the time the government provides. Have fun and do try to have some small jobs and get some real experience. They don't owe you and you don't owe them.
    7. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by m4dm4n · · Score: 1

      While I prefer the idea of degrees not really counting much when compared to experience, I've found that they do unfortunately count for more than they should.

      The company I currently work at used to hire based on experience, and some of our best coders have no degree. Then it got big enough to have an HR department and now we only get people with degrees. When you are in a company where the hiring is done by technical people, degrees mean very little, but when non technical HR lackies get involved, it becomes important.

    8. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Face it the Republicans have been pushing this for so long it's gospel, it was Regan who set the ball rolling and despite all the anti-globalists picketting around the world they've basically ignored any opposition - if you want to change it you're going to have to change the govt. (and Clinton style democrats aren't much worse - you're going to need either the far left or right-wing isolationists).

      There's another way to look at it though - smart people have been coming to the US for generations to make the big bucks now they just have to go somewhere else - if you're smart you'll get up and follow them - you may earn a relatively lower salary in India but the cost of living is so much lower you'll live wonderfully (and if you haven't been you should go India is really a great place to go to!).

      For the record I outsourced myself last year (to NZ), I'm earning my old salary but taxes are a little lower here (than in California), and the cost of living is much lower (mostly because I don't have to pay $25k/year private school fees for my kids like we had to in the US - here the public schools haven't had a generation of prop13 neglect).

    9. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by blowdart · · Score: 2, Insightful
      when non technical HR lackies get involved

      Unless you're getting HR write the specs for the person you need it shouldn't be any different. You're the one that sets the requirements, if HR are changing them I suggest a clue stick is in order.

    10. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by blowdart · · Score: 0
      I guess our hiring styles differ. In my view, after 5 years of actual work a degree counts for nothing, unless it's very specific and targetted at the role.

      My problem with new graduates is that a lot of the times degrees, whilst they do give you a good grounding don't teach flexibility. I've seen people, one year out of college waste hours and email flames because their course taught them to design something one way and any other way is wrong. Of course this does depend on the person, but I've learnt the hard way to not view a degree as a tick box or an advantage.

      Maybe you've just been lucky in your hiring :)

    11. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God I hate you fucking liberal pukes. It's "prop13 neglect" that keeps old people from being thrown out of their homes, ass-face. It's administrative bloat and cronyism, by you lefties, I might add, that's been sucking the public school classrooms dry for a generation.

    12. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by nathanh · · Score: 1
      When hiring I've never looked at anyone's qualifications, but at their experience.

      Looking only at their experience and never at their qualifications is just as silly as looking only at their qualifications and never at their experience. Both qualifications and experience contribute to the skills a person has to offer. Unless you're being facetious to prove a point, you should be considering both when evaluating a potential recruit.

      I've met a lot of so-called programmers with 10-15 years experience who write absolute garbage. It's quite obvious they haven't got a clue what they hell they're doing. Experience alone is not a measure of a person's skill, in the same way that qualifications alone mean absolutely diddly-squat.

      University degrees do not entitle you to a job and if you're one of the people that treat them as such I suggest you get a large grip on reality.

      I agree with that, but I think your extremist reaction of never looking at their qualifications has gone too far. It's too black and white. The world is full of colour.

    13. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by haggar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I guess you have no qualifications yourself, and are unconsciously bitter about it, so you try to find satisfaction by using your "powers" of recruitment to humble those who have graduated.

      --
      Sigged!
    14. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't make sense to talk about "a university degree" and what it represents as if all degrees are equal. Here in the UK, the quality of the universities varies enormously. I've interviewed graduates of former polytechnics who were barely literate.

      I doubt the USA is much different.

    15. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by blowdart · · Score: 1
      OK I'll admit I was over-exaggerating for effect (hey, this is slashdot)

      What I was trying to get across is that sense of entitlement some degree holders have, heck that sense of entitlement a lot of people, degree or not seem to have especially when it comes to outsourcing (but it seems more common with degree holders). No-one "owes you a job". A lot of new graduates especially seem to think they'll drop into a higher paid job than someone without a degree simply because they have a piece of paper.

      Truth be told, without exaggeration, when I've recruited degrees are not used as a filtering mechanism ever, lack of one won't mean your CV doesn't end up in front of me, having one doesn't mean it will.

    16. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by bladernr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I've done a lot of hiring work in the past, and will tell you straight that a degree gives you a huge level of credibility over someone who claims "x years of experience".

      Well I do a lot of hiring now, and manage a large technical organization, and I say it depends on the field. In hiring engineers (real ones... not "software" :), a degree really, really matters. No one is going to have some guy without a degree design a bridge or a building.

      I think computer software is different because of how fast the technology has been moving. Not only is experience better than a degree (with both being ideal), but people with a degree don't need it in CS. In fact, I prefer people with math degrees who learned languages "on the job." I've also had very good luck with mechanical engineers (I think it's the same thought process in mechanical as in software... ie, chain reactions).

      If you look at the past, you'll see it's the same in all professions. When a field of study is new, experience is far more important than formal education, since the formal education rarely keeps up with a fast moving technology (in University, I learned assembler on a mainframe that hadn't been manufactured in over a decade).

      As the pace of change in a given technology slows down, as it always does, formal education catches up, and then you will see much more entry-level quality out of those who have a CS degree than either those who don't have a degree or have it in a different field.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    17. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I guess you have no qualifications yourself, and are unconsciously bitter about it, so you try to find satisfaction by using your "powers" of recruitment to humble those who have graduated.

      Or perhaps he's annoyed at the unwarrented respect accorded to and expected by dimwits who got university degrees because they were told it was a money ticket and then end up having to be taught how to tie their shoes on the job.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    18. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Exporting jobs is just plain bad for any economy.

      I would think it's pretty good for China's economy. But that's not what you meant is it? Well, I don't see why Americans deserve jobs more than China.

      In the long-term, outsourcing is good. The Chinese/Indians get more jobs, they get more money, their standard of living goes up. Eventually they become better places to live. Surely that's a good thing? You know most people in China and India live in poverty? By contrast even the poorest Americans live in luxury, excuse me if I don't shed any tears.

      No-one stays on top forever, you have to work at it. The Roman empire collapsed, the British empire collapsed, all sorts of superpowers have been and gone. America's going to sink back eventually. Instead of complaining about jobs being outsourced, how about Americans get skilled and jobs which can't be outsourced? Why not start companies which employ solely Americans if you're bothered that much? Perhaps it's time to take responsibility for your own lives rather than blaming big evil corporations.

      Linux doesn't really have this economic effect attached to it. Even if you buy a distro, you can buy the distro(s) made in your country.

      I don't think that jobs lost through open source software would do much for the economy. Yes, they could make money from support, but then so can people whose jobs are outsourced. That argument cuts both ways.

      Of course, Linux softare contains code from big corporations who definitely outsource employees. You forgot about that didn't you? Choosing your distro on the country it's from is a stupid thing to do anyway. Choose your products based on quality and price, there's no other way. Nationalism has no place in computing.

      Microsoft is a company with employees all over the world. They do business all over the world. They don't operate entirely within America, their sole interest isn't the economy in America. If their interests are best served by employing people in China, they they should do it. It could mean that Chinaman being able to feed his family, perhaps get some electricity and TV, heating and indoor plumbing. So an American instead has to get the 32" TV instead of the 56" TV, that's not the worst thing in the world.

      Of course Slashdotters are always saying that national boundaries don't mean anything in this Internet age, usually when it comes to visiting dodgy foreign mp3 or porn sites or downloading TV programmes. But as soon as jobs have the same freedom they want 20" walls around the borders. You can't have your cake and eat it.

    19. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I influence my boss's decisions based on my knowledge. I work amongst a team of about 10 or so people in a large Australian retailer and I honestly believe I can learn much faster than any of my peers. And, perhaps the reason for that is I'm, in fact, younger than most of the others. Why am I younger? Well, that would be because I am an 'experience only' kinda guy. I learnt what I needed to learn, working my way up through an Internet helpdesk (hello, problem solving, sometimes in very novel ways), all the way to having a job title with the word "Senior" in it. Degrees don't train you how to learn. Thats what happens back at school when you have nothing better to do. First princples can be learnt in experience as well. And, perhaps a little know-how on using the web would help these days. However, hand me a book, and a practical problem to work on, and I'll have a well founded idea of how to fix it within a week, tops (and if the pressure's on, I'll be happy to give you something in half a day). One question I would ask you, if you hired two people side by side for the same position, one with x years experience, and one with x years experience PLUS a degree, what is the extra dollar value you would place on candidate number 2? If you say you wouldn't even bother with candidate number 1, I'll remind myself not to bother handing in my resume for a job at your place of work, because it sounds as though where you come from, people wouldn't even bother with the five minutes of reading time.

    20. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      " Well I'm sure a lot of CS degree holders in here would like to be able to get work in the US. Not to have to move to China or India to get a tech job."

      I certainly don't want to get a job just because I happen to live in the US. I want to get it on my individual merits. If that means I have to compete with people in China and India, so be it.

      "Exporting jobs is just plain bad for any economy. It reduces jobs and increases the money flow out of the country. The US is experiencing some serious economic draining ATM."

      First of all, the US has one of the lowest unemployment rates in the world, we just whine about it more than other countries. Offshoring saves companies money, lowers the prices of products for consumers, frees up resources, and opens up markets in foreign countries to American goods. So in reality, it is quite beneficial to the economy.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    21. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      " Exporting jobs is just plain bad for any economy. It reduces jobs and increases the money flow out of the country. The US is experiencing some serious economic draining ATM."

      That's the nature of capitalism and free markets. USA is experiencing nothing different from what it or any other country experienced over the last 200 years... Jobs--and capital--has always gone to the lowest-cost producer. What's happening is nothing new. Tech jobs may be moving to India and China but they will just as easily move to Vietnam and Ecuador in 10 years if costs are lower there...

      " Linux doesn't really have this economic effect attached to it. Even if you buy a distro, you can buy the distro(s) made in your country."

      Buying local goods makes very little difference (except from an environmental and possibly human rights perspective (e.g. workers may be more abused elsewhere) but we are not talking about that with this situation). There is no such thing as a local good that is made in a particular country. Is the computer you are reading this on made locally? If 80% of something is manufactured elsewhere and 20% is assembled loallys, and 100% sold in USA, is that a local good? The fact of the matter is, there is nothing that is a local good--never has been and never will be. I'll bet that 90% of what you consume is dependent on foreign goods to some degree.

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    22. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      " If she export a thousand jobs to China for making ping-pong balls and we convert our thousand workers to something else (say making foobar which goes for $100 each and each worker can make 3 of in an hour), it can be a win/win sitiation - their economies get 1000 more jobs that didn't exist before and we maximize the potential of our workforce."

      Yeah... it's called comparative advantage...

      " Of course, I wonder if economic academics figure in the cost of building up China and other countries (competition for resources such as oil, future competition in the marketplace, etcetera)."

      Overall that's supposed to be good for several reasons.

      One, increased competition lowers product costs and improves quality. For example, car quality and costs improved significantly when Japan and Korea started making cars instead of mostly USA (I'm talking about what was bought in USA--obviously European companies were around too).

      Second, increasing standard of living in other countries, and increasing global GDP enables everyone to be better off as a whole--although you as an individual may or may not be better off. For instance, if there was no growth in the developing countries, most the developed world will go into a slow decline/"recession of sorts" (since there is literally no growth in Europe and Japan).

      I agree that global labour arbitrage is rough for the workers. I myself have been negatively impacted by it (I'm in Canada BTW). I think the best one can do is to somehow go into a field or maybe do something that will be in demand in the future... I don't know what that means but that's what needs to be done...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    23. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BS.

      After having worked with large project teams acorss borders etc, holding senior positions, even coaching and mentoring those that are supposed to know the "WHY" of everything in todays loosely coupled world of system integration and various diciplines, let me tell you, it does not matter wether the person holds a masters, or a bachelors, or nothing beyond prmary school.

      When the real world kicks in, experience, together with a true analytical mindset is the only thing that works.

      I have seen guys with all the credentials one could desire, yet when a few disks in their precious "little" db that their supposed to keep alive goes down, calls ppl who has NO formal education (they're simple really good at what they do).

      I have seen people with phd for christ sake, not being able to apply a single common practice when left to create a small support utility in .net (which isnt exactly rocket science..), returning with a code that resembles a 8 year old that has discovered the sound & clip art of powerpoint...

      No. Education proves only that you manage to get through an education, and that hopefully some of the skills like group assignments, dev/prod lifecycle, methodologies have rubbed off on you.

      But in real life, its experience, and experience alone.

    24. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Advanced degrees are a sign of a dangerous tendency to dabble in the theoretical. Some times there are marketable skills only attainable through advanced study, but in a lot of instances, it's a case of someone who can't cope with the non-academic world taking an 'extended leave' from the reality of the commercial world we live in.

      Your advice for students to 'take it easy' and soak up all the government funding they can get is possibly branding those you advice as loafers to future employers.

      --
      resigned
    25. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by timeOday · · Score: 1
      I certainly don't want to get a job just because I happen to live in the US. I want to get it on my individual merits. If that means I have to compete with people in China and India, so be it.
      Being better is practically irrelevant. America is an expensive place to live, still pretty full of people whose wages are not forced down by outsourcing. (How much do you think a plumber, cop, or teacher would make if anybody on earth could apply for their job?) It's just silly to think you can be 5x as productive (or whatever the multiple required for a comparable standard of living here); the Chinese are by no means stupid or lazy. Just go to any US grad school and see.

      We seem to have found enough menial service jobs to replace our decimated manufacturing industry. Do you really think that makes it OK?

    26. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 3, Informative

      why is this significant again? Companies offshore all the time. Hell, some companies move their headquarters to different continents.

      Perhaps it's significant because Microsoft is whining about declining CS enrollment and lobbying the government for an increase in the H-1B cap, when they really aren't doing much local hiring. It is significant because what they say for publication is a lie, and their real interest is solely in cheaper labor. It also seems significant that they are apparently buying Chinese cooperation in anti-piracy efforts with jobs that currently belong to American workers. It gives new meaning to the term human capital.

    27. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Linux doesn't really have this economic effect attached to it. Even if you buy a distro, you can buy the distro(s) made in your country.

      I have no idea which country Cheapbytes.com has their CDs pressed in.

      --
      resigned
    28. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree with malkavian.

      I'm the experience-only type (actually graduated in a non tech field) and while working at M$, I got outstripped real bad by my cubicle neighbour who was coming fresh from Uni.

      The experienced guys do have a headstart, but they tend to lose it pretty quickly.

    29. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by krewemaynard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's significant because Microsoft is whining about declining CS enrollment and lobbying the government for an increase in the H-1B cap, when they really aren't doing much local hiring.

      Perhaps they are'nt doing much local hiring because of the declining CS enrollment? How can you hire what isn't there? I'm no MS fan, but this post seems to miss the mark. Somewhat akin to James Taranto's musings on prison populations: "Hmm, more criminals are in prison and the crime rate is down. Seems like simple cause and effect to us, but somehow it's supposed to be a paradox."
      --
      I saw it on Slashdot, it must be true!
    30. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by malkavian · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Wish I could use the mod points I've got to give you a raise in there.
      A lot of valid points coming to light.

      The best team I've worked in, way back when was multidisciplinary. A PhD mathematician (who could take sections of the implementations I'd made and fine tune them to a level that left me boggling), myself (Real Time Systems Bsc), a couple of experience bods who'd worked their way up over time, and the boss who was an Elecronic Engineer (Msc).

      I ended up doing the software engineering (as we didn't need formal spec) and systems architecture (along with a fair bit of coding afterwards), the mathematician took areas where the algorithms were inefficient, and optimised them away.. The experience coders did a good job of the coding..
      And the boss knew exactly what management processes to use for engineering a project (from extensive experience).

      A lot of the problems with software today are simply caused because people don't engineer them.
      Commerce is trying to make a fast buck, and, in the bridge analogy, is saying "We can put up a couple of ropes and tie them to a tree. What do you need a proper footbridge over the road for?".

      So, a lot of software is built like the ropes over the road. It's cheap, shoddy, but does the job, with the odd few bits falling off and causing no end of consternation.

      I'm behind you all the way on saying that a mathematician or an engineer (my first degree was in Chemical Engineering by the way) can apply the same processes as a CS grad, and will (in the longer term, which is where you should always be aiming anyway) be just as good.
      I was pointing out that the properly educated CS grad will from the word go have a better instinctive grasp of what to do as concerns the tools and methods of engineering as applied to software.

      First choice for me on software hires is Computer related degree plus good experience and track record. Very closely followed by Engineering/Math/Philosophy/Science degrees with the same level of experience and track record.
      Then comes long track record and extensive experience with no degree, followed by Computing related degree with no/little experience, then the science/engineering degrees with little or no experience.
      For someone with a small track record, and no degree, I'd not really go for that. They may be good. They may be highly skilled.
      But if they're up against someone who's proved they have a high ability to learn, and has a good knowledge of a wide spectrum of theories in the field that they can bring to bear, they're just not going to get the job.

      For much the same reason, I suspect, that you may find someone who knows how to build a bridge really really well.. You're just not going to hire him unless he's done that degree..

      Really, I think it all boils down to me wanting to see that degree to prove someone's serious. I just have a slight preference for CS over the other disciplines (having done both, and seeing how my perspectives were altered slightly by doing the computing degree).

    31. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      That was really profound, dude@! No doubt you follow the Carly Fiorina philosophy - no corporation based in your country owes you a job - you owe them their protection and tax breaks and fouling the environment and ....and ... and....

      Maybe those of us who fought the wars and did the chores (and that includes fighting sea pirates and taking back the Mayaguez) don't always deserve to be treated like slaves and cannon fodder.....dude!

    32. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done a lot of hiring work in the past, and will tell you straight that a degree gives you a huge level of credibility over someone who claims "x years of experience".

      My experience has been the opposite: a person with a degree is useless for 2-4 years; everything they do during that period has to be monitored. In contrast, an experienced developer need only become acquainted with the subject area background knowledge to be proficient.


      Now, I've done a degree (two actually), AND got commercial certification.

      Perhaps this explains your predisposition toward favoring degreed/certified persons.

      In 95%+ of cases, they rapidly outstrip the 'experience only' people across a broad spectrum of understanding.

      Again, this is contrary to my experience and that of my cohorts. BTW very few students understand the theory out of school. Luckily, in most cases, that is not necessary. But understanding of the theory together with practical experience usually indicates that a person is a programming pearl.

    33. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your personal anecdote certainly disproves any argument the other way!!!

      Also, it sounds like your degrees in the UK suck. If you want a CS degree in the US, you've got a lot of work to do.

    34. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, College teaches you how to teach yourself. That said, I have a art's degree and I taught myself C/C++ DOS graphics, took a short course in VB and now I am working with Linux. I have learned C# mono,ASP.net,XHTML, PHP, Perl, NAT, routing...., all on my own - at work.

      One thing I have notice with many CS degree people that have worked with corporations, is that they have assembly (white collar assembly line workers) line knowledge. They can only do one thing well and everything else is a mystery. This is by no means across the board but I have noticed it alot in our hiring.

      I think it all comes down to how much you like what you do. I can tell by a persons attitude,their work and some questions how much they are into what they do. not just by the cs degree.

    35. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "It's just silly to think you can be 5x as productive (or whatever the multiple required for a comparable standard of living here); the Chinese are by no means stupid or lazy. Just go to any US grad school and see."

      Well now thats an odd thing to say. If all the jobs were in China now and the US tech market is dead, why would you be able to see any Chinese kids in US grad schools? Why would they come half way around the world to be unemployed for the rest of their lives?

      Unless if in reality there are currently more tech opportunities here in the states. Granted as the Chinese and Indian economies grow, so will the number of opportunities available in those areas, but so will the cost of living and thus the salaries.

      And no, most jobs cannot just as easily be done half way around the world as they can in the cube down the hall. You need to be able to communicate with the people on your project, and unless you are willing to work hours like 9:00 pm to 6:00 am when the other guys are in and fly around the world whenever you need to meet someone face to face, you are not going to be able to do that. So if most of the demand for IT services is going to be in the US, guess who is going to get the lion's share of the job market?

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    36. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by siggy_lxvi · · Score: 0

      Yet another person who seems to be unable to separate the concepts of "patriotism" or "looking after one's own" from warmongering.... Why is an American more deserving of a job than a chinaman? Because he lives in America. Because he contributes to our society. Because he hasn't been taught from birth to hate us (unless he lives in California). Because, to us in the US, the American has paid his dues, however that's measured: common experience, common cultural and value systems, whatever. And most of all, because he's not aiming nuclear weapons at us.

    37. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by chialea · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of variety in "CS" degrees, which is a good thing to keep in mind. I graduated with one, but took almost entirely math and CS theory courses. I'd probably fall right into the "useful mathematician" category you've got there. :) In terms of mathematicians, you might have your best shot with people who've done a fair bit of combinatorics. I've found it very useful, myself.

      Lea

    38. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Why is an American more deserving of a job than a chinaman? Because he lives in America. Because he contributes to our society.

      A chinaman lives in China. He contributes to his society. Surely then he deserves the job.

      What a stupid thing to say.

    39. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by titzandkunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Re: Hiring of non-CS graduates into software engineering roles]

      "...I've also had very good luck with mechanical engineers (I think it's the same thought process in mechanical as in software... ie, chain reactions)...

      I agree (Having a 14 year software career on the back of a BEng in mechanical engineering).

      Although EE is the "classic" non-CS precursor to a software engineering role, Mech Eng does have the following going for it:

      1. Analytical.
      2. Maths-heavy.
      3. Fact-based (cf. The much-derided Media Studies or any subjective field).
      4. A large computing component (Maple, FEA et al).
      5. A constant refrain by the profs that once graduated, you're just about qualified to start learning the really useful stuff!

      T&K.
      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    40. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they are'nt doing much local hiring because of the declining CS enrollment? How can you hire what isn't there? I'm no MS fan, but this post seems to miss the mark.

      Microsoft added fewer than 3,000 employees last year worldwide. If they are really hurting for staff, why aren't they doing any campus recruiting any more - even when invited by the schools? Why do they hire only about 1% of US applicants? Engineering unemployment (including programmers) is still near historic highs, and you're claiming MS can't find local workers? The declining CS enrollment is a direct and normal marketplace response to an oversupply of US IT workers. When your programmer parent is out of a job, and American companies won't hire him/her, you pick a major other than CS.

    41. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha! A note from someone who doesn't have one. What happened... couldn't make the grade getting in? When I was 'in' --yes, I did make the grade getting in-- you had to get 'work experience', and no, not refilling the coffee pot and doing little errands, but installing servers, operating systems, then developing projects with at least 50,000 lines of code in them, developed by you and meeting spec. Yes you got paid for these co-op jobs. Yes, the projects had to go into production for them to be 'counted', and you had to have a certain number of these courses 'counted' before getting the paper. If you had made the grade like I did, then you would know all of this already. But alas, you got in by buttons and catching the boss with a sheep. I often find that those who discount education so quickly are those who have damn spare little themselves. It's kinda like penis envy.

    42. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by ItCompiled! · · Score: 1

      Software has come a long way. Pretty soon we will hit a deficit of quality engineered software. I am a software engineer. I took all the engineering courses along with the "coding" courses along with the calculus, probability, physics, and the mixture of it all. Oh, forgot to mention, you can go to a major university and take "Software Engineering" instead of just CS. I'll admit that I was insecure about my degree, especially around "Electrical" and "Mechanical" Engineers. They know the stuff. Like myself. But It puts a smile on my face when they say - "Gee, I thought it would be a lot more code than that.!" Design goes a long way. Where you learn goes a long way. Software Engineering is a reality, one that has endured the likes of small town white folk racist and ignorant mentality of not being a discipline, an engineering discipline. The more I read on I realize how backward and ancient is the idea "Engineers" have of Software Engineers. I aim now more than ever to disprove them, the likes of you. I have the respect of my peers because I respect them. I gain their confidence because I confide in them. Two cents worth, mister.

    43. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by bone43 · · Score: 1

      Yea but in my profession construction all the book smarts in the world aint worth a shit if ya cant swing a hammer.
          I guess I will always have a job as there plenty of house to be fixed or built and if I like to travel there's lots of money to be made in New Orleans these days.
        I say give me one guy with common since over ten that have an education and will get the job done!

    44. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Software is different because CS is not S or even engineering yet.

      It's still very much craftsmanship like Mech E used to be.

      We're probably about 1 generation away from it being a real engineering discipline.

      But it's the guys graduating with CS degrees now that will go on to train the generation of people who will be engineers.

      How to tell the difference between engineering and craftsmanship?

      Different engineers will do something largely the same way. Two engineers asked to create product X which meets requirements Y will probably go through the same development process.

      Craftsmanship is much more individualistic. Two software guys asked to create program X which meets Y requirements will produce vastly different code.

      It's just a matter of time. BTW, I'm a real engineer (ME) but I've spent much time in the SW world (easy money, not as boring as engineering yet.)

      I think we're coming up on a cross-over point: I've seen much some great MSCS guys who lack only a years worth before they're better than guys with 10 years. 10 years ago, a CS qualified you for nothing.

    45. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by ItCompiled! · · Score: 1

      I would defend the CS guys, but I would never consider myself good enough to do so, not by myself. As far as I know, the only difference between a REAL engineer, and a fake one would be the recognition of the state. Gee I am truly humbled. Anyway I do believe you are a ME, you think like one. You do not reason like a SE. Meeting requirements..any code monkey can meet requirements, what matters is the process. Hence the difference between security and "Windows has discovered that this could allow an attacker to take over your computer" or something of that sort. "I'm a real engineer (ME) but I've spent much time in the SW world" Then go do mechanical engineering and stop making the real software guys look bad. If you believe so much in your ME degree then why do you not give credit to anyone besides yourself! If you do, it's only to make yourself sound better, like you actually know about SE when all you did was made it compile. "Gee why doesn't this work? It compiled didn't it!!" Go post somewhere else.

    46. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by gotak · · Score: 1

      However, today it's something a little different.

      They outsource (it's not really out sourcing when it's the same company doing the hiring overseas) some jobs. The people who got downsized here need to find work so they fill the job market with supply. The end result is cheaper workers there and cheaper workers here. And the rich boss gets to keep all the money for themselves. It's comparative adventage all right for the people in poewr.

    47. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Qualifications are just an inidication of ability not the actual possession of an ability (it is the slack easy way for personal managers with degrees to pick staff and avoid blame when the staff they pick are useless). Experience is the the only actual qualifier of ability. The experience of course must be true and applicable to the job they are applying for. Of course people with degrees applicable to personel management are really only fit to hire their own replacements. New trick is to get your staff working in that area to handle the recruiting process (not advertising just resume review and interviews).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    48. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offshore?yeah simply for Tax Evasion.
      Now if we could only offshore Congress,say to Sweden or Norway,be nice to include the Supreme Court and all of our local Politicians.

    49. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by aaronbeach · · Score: 1

      I am CS major senior in Chicago.
      However, I am also interested in economics... what microsoft is doing seems to make sense, it's not necessarily bad for the economy, that's just how economics work. The entire world is a global economy now, and all that means is that if you want a high paying job you will just have to attain unique skills. The basic kind of programming Microsoft needs done is not any more skilled than most secratary's jobs. It might as well be factory jobs they are exporting. The CS majors who are losing thier jobs, should either move to china; stop whining and get another job; or grow up and learn something unique and just simply be better than the next guy. Quit whining about them working for less.

      Welcome to the global economy boys... you can't just sit on your cozy job anymore, and everyone everywhere is going to benifit from you losing that job to a harder working cheaper laborer, YOU LAZY BASTARDS!

    50. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Why is it that every time Microsoft breathe it seems the media can't wait to tell us what is happening. I hate to inform you all but my life DOES NOT revolve around Bill Gate's business decisions. Offshoring is inevitable ... it's all about the money you see. So come on guys, get inventive and creative and tell me how it can be fixed! It can be fixed, can't it???

    51. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. I have worked for and with some major players in home and small bus. industries (dell, linksys, AMD, IBM, cisco, etc..) and EVERYONE has outsourced jobs... Dell especially, we have more locations outside of the US than in the US..

    52. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      But you CAN'T compete with someone in India or China, if you're competing on price. Never mind that you'd be homeless and starve to death on the wages, it would be illegal for you to accept them.

      Now, if you really want to level the playing field, fine. But to do that, America should require that any goods imported into the US from anywhere in the world must not be touched by anyone paid less than the current US minimum wage.

    53. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      First of all, labor laws such as minimum wage do not apply to exempt employees such as software engineers. A decent knowledge of your country's labor laws is a must for anyone in the workplace, I can only hope you are just still in school.

      Second, what if other countries did the same thing? What if Europian countries forced other nations to comply with their values? There is a reason countries like France and Germany have double digit unemployment rates, they have very liberal laws. If we were required to comply with them, production here would fall and umemployment would skyrocket. Using your logic, should Silicon Valley prohibit goods made where the cost of living is lower (such as the south east US) from being sold there?

      In the real world, offshoring has saved American jobs, not taken them. It has opened up huge markets to American companies, and many companies in trouble were able to just offshore a few positions rather than go bankrupt and fire everyone. But America, with its relatively strong economy, has a huge demand for information technology and thus there will be a huge demand for IT employees here (just maybe not as big as in the late 90's but that had nothing to do with India or China). And as the Indian and Chinese economies grow, so will their costs of living and thus so will their salaries.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
    54. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you are simply incorrect about labor laws not applying at all. Among other conditions for a computer related job to be declared exempt, here's a quote from the US Department of Labor website's computer related ocupations page:

      The employee must be compensated either on a salary or fee basis at a rate not less than $455 per week or, if compensated on an hourly basis, at a rate not less than $27.63 an hour

      I'm thinking you missed something in school if you don't realize that you're protected by some labor laws even as a software engineer - or you're still in school.

      And what if European contries did the same thing? I have no problem with a European country refusing to import goods manufactured at less than their minimum wage, that would certainly result in lower unemployment in Europe - as Europe is suffering from the same offshoring problems we're having in the US. Of course, you're incorrect about German unemployment anyway - according to the German Federal Foreign Office website, unemployment is currently at 9.8%, and at 7.6% if you only look at the former West Germany. High, but not double digit. France is barely in double digits at 10.1%, according to the CIA World Factbook.

      And Silicon Valley having import restrictions is a rediculous arguement - There's this little thing known as the "interstate commerce clause" in the US constitution prohibiting states from imposing import tarrifs and production regulations on goods manufactured in other states. Silicon Valley employees also have the right to relocate to the Southeast without needing government permission, and would likely be able to maintain a higher standard of living if they did so, even at the somewhat lower wages in the Southeast.

      In the real world, offshoring has destroyed American jobs, not saved them. It has a snowball effect that is currently accellerating, and can only be stopped by government action making it less cost effective to relocate jobs out of the US. Trying to wait on the Indian and Chinese economies to grow while allowing unrestricted offshoring will only result in massive American unemployment in the next 50 - 100 years.

      The few markets opened are tiny compared to the number and value of jobs lost - which I've seen estimated at between 200,000 and 1 million.

    55. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, free trade benefits both countrites citizens.

    56. Re:Apart from bad mouthing Microsoft... by nwbvt · · Score: 1
      "I'm afraid you are simply incorrect about labor laws not applying at all. Among other conditions for a computer related job to be declared exempt, here's a quote from the US Department of Labor website's computer related ocupations page..."

      Thats funny, I don't remember saying that no labor laws applied to exempt employees, only laws like minimum wage. Oh no, thats right, that exactly what I said, jackass.

      "Of course, you're incorrect about German unemployment anyway - according to the German Federal Foreign Office [tatsachen-...schland.de] website, unemployment is currently at 9.8%, and at 7.6% if you only look at the former West Germany. High, but not double digit. France is barely in double digits at 10.1%, according to the CIA World Factbook."

      You know, it takes a special kind of stupidity to post a link to an article containing 2002 numbers and claim that is the current situation. As recently as last March Germany's unemployment rate was well over 12%. Maybe it has dramatically fallen by a few points recently (I don't follow the day to day status of European economies), but it is still unbelievably high. And are you trying to claim that stating a 10% unemployment rate is double digits is exaggerating the situation?

      And obviously I wasn't talking about only West Germany. Of course some regions are going to have lower unemployment rates than others.

      " The few markets opened are tiny compared to the number and value of jobs lost - which I've seen estimated at between 200,000 and 1 million."

      China and India happen to have the two largest populations in the world. You think those are small markets? And the vast majority of those jobs were lost because the dot-com economy fell apart.

      Come back when you have half a clue about how the economy works, as opposed. Maybe I'll listen to your opinion of how the "real world" works then.

      --
      Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  4. I don't get it. by JPriest · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So supporting an international effort like Linux is OK but having off shore operations is not OK? No double standards here.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Big difference - with Linux, the international help *helps* me with my job - with Microsoft the international help *competes* with me for my job.

      Basically, with corporate budgets (and yes, even at microsoft's size is fixed) Windows is a zero-sum game - Linux jobs are not a zero-sum game because the more people that contribute the more my work can build on them.

    2. Re:I don't get it. by kihjin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Well...

      1) Microsoft is an American company
      2) Linux was developed outside of America. According to wikipedia, Linus developed it as he attended the University of Helsinki (And no, this Institution isn't in America)

      The difference is that Linux has been adopted outside of Europe, and Microsoft is positioning itself outside of America.

      --
      This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
    3. Re:I don't get it. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So supporting an international effort like Linux is OK but having off shore operations is not OK? No double standards here.

      Nothing prevents anyone anywhere from working on, or selling services related to, Linux. If it had been proprietary, you'd have to move to Finland to work on it.

    4. Re:I don't get it. by Bob54321 · · Score: 0

      "The difference is that Linux has been adopted outside of Europe, and Microsoft is positioning itself outside of America." Comparing an operating system and a company seems a little strange. Try replacing Microsoft with Windows in the above statement just doesn't work though.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    5. Re:I don't get it. by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Big difference - with Linux, the international help *helps* me with my job - with Microsoft the international help *competes* with me for my job.

      ... but isn't it this very slashdot crowd that cries "competition is a good thing!" Having to compete for your job means you have to do better at it, do it for less, do it faster, etc. all in an effort to add value to the service you are paid for. If there is no competition, many will simply settle for stagnation and small to no income raises. On the other hand when competition exists, the smart ones will step it up a notch and in the long run be better off for it due to their own maintenance/increase in standard of living through pay/benefits, but also because when a company's employees produce more with less there tend to be increased profits... which in turn can be used to bolster the company as well as reward those that help to make it happen.

      Complaining about outsourcing and how it will steal our jobs isn't going to change the fact that right now the people overseas are likely doing their job cheaper, faster, and in many cases better than the 'equivalent' US worker. Instead, get off your ass, find opportunities to make yourself shine, and add value to your company in ways that distinguish you from your overseas counterparts... other than the tremendously more expensive cost for service that is.

    6. Re:I don't get it. by montyzooooma · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're right and you could go further and say that supporting any not-for-profit software development is actively trying to take away jobs from the people who make their living at it. What seems to upset people here is the thought that Microsoft (or whoever) is taking one paying job and moving it to another country just to save money. If OTOH they just canned the jobs outright people would be dancing in the streets saying it was the beginning of the end for M$ (or whoever) and didn't they deserve it. It would suck to have your job taken away and moved to China or India but it probably sucks more to be Chinese or Indian and not have the opportunity to better yourself.

    7. Re:I don't get it. by adtifyj · · Score: 1

      So if I understand you correctly, its difficult to compare GNU/Linux with MS/Windows?

      Every baby born, in every country in the world, has the opportunity of becoming a GNU programmer, but apparently it is now becoming harder for Americans to become a Microsft programmer. I think GNU has the advantage in this contest.

      That's why the original post accusing the submitter of double standards is funny. Every American job that is related to Linux exists because some dude in Finland decided to throw his code to the wind, letting it grow wherever it landed.

    8. Re:I don't get it. by R55 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For Linux, transnational developement is carried out through co-operation with each hacker voluntarily contributing his/her skill.

      For Microsoft, it is more of a legal requirement; if they have to sell their goods to China, they have to give employment to their citizens.
      In the process, many developers who may have actually created that piece of software on which outsourced employees are working on, are kicked out of the company to make room for outsourced employees.

    9. Re:I don't get it. by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would suck to have your job taken away and moved to China or India but it probably sucks more to be Chinese or Indian and not have the opportunity to better yourself.

      The Chinese and Indians are free to open all the companies they want to employ their own people. They don't need American companies coming there to have jobs. To insinuate that Chinese and Indian people are incapable of starting their own companies, instead of merely working at the whim of Americans, seems extremely insulting to me. India has many successful native companies, such as Tata and Wipro, and China has many other successful native companies like Lenovo (which just bought out IBM's PC business).

    10. Re:I don't get it. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... but isn't it this very slashdot crowd that cries "competition is a good thing!"

      Besides promulgating the "all of Slashdot speaks with one voice" fallacy, you are confusing competition for goods and services with competition for jobs.

    11. Re:I don't get it. by Calroth · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Besides promulgating the "all of Slashdot speaks with one voice" fallacy, you are confusing competition for goods and services with competition for jobs.

      Put another way, competition is a good thing as long as it's somebody else doing the competing...

    12. Re:I don't get it. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slashdot speaks with three voices , everyone thinks it is one because each of the three different groups are always doing sarcastic imitations of the other groups .Everyone has forgotten which voice is which so are using the same voice ..
      Job competition is the same as any other type of free market competition . Offering a service or goods for the best price and let the consumer choose .The only difference is that the employers are the consumers.
      The only thing i can see as illogical about off shoring is that your normally kicking one of primary markets in the crotch .Sure it may help create a new market but it will be in the short term at least damaging to a main consumer base and the long term advantage is risky . Transfer wealth from your primary market and you could cause a domino effect , not to mention the PR perhaps persuading your consumers to go with the competitors .
      It would be better if they would instead of shutting down current bases of operation ,just open new ones to help create the new market

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    13. Re:I don't get it. by dslbrian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Complaining about outsourcing and how it will steal our jobs isn't going to change the fact that right now the people overseas are likely doing their job cheaper, faster, and in many cases better than the 'equivalent' US worker. Instead, get off your ass, find opportunities...

      Actually having worked with some of those overseas people I can tell you they are not doing the job cheaper, faster, or better. What they usually do is make the job take three times as long as it should, consistently foul up the most simple tasks, and hop jobs to a better "overseas" position in the middle of the project. But thats not the point I want to make.

      While the US is collectively sitting on its "ass" as you say, the government has been shipping money and expertise overseas at an unreal rate. Consider when you run enormous trade defecits, increase the unemployment level of your "skilled" workers, and in the process ship all your technical expertise over to a country which in the near future will likely be your competitor rather than your cheap slave labor, it paints a very bad long term picture. In the end, you will end up being the 3rd world country, while your technically skilled overseas counterparts will be reaping the profits of your giveaways.

      On top of that, while your sitting here in the US surrounded by hoards of unemployed workers who sat on their collective ass during the whole thing, those workers are no longer contributing to the tax base, in fact they are all on welfare - so who exactly is going to be paying for the roads your driving on, and the schools your kids go to? The small fraction of elite workers left here who still have jobs certainly aren't going to support it all.

      Isn't it interesting that we are not exporting our CEO jobs overseas? After all, by your logic those overseas CEOs should be doing the job cheaper, faster, and better, right? Or do you mean only lowly semi-skilled overseas workers do things cheaper, faster, and better?

      In any event, the US government needs to be more proactive in protecting its interests in this area. Companies run on the work done by their entire lower rank - the grunt jobs. And I would bet most such jobs have some amount of technical expertise, and more importantly experience. For many jobs if you gave me a choice of choosing someone with a PhD and little experience, versus someone with 20years experience I would tend to choose the experienced one rather than the PhD. But at the rate we are exporting our technical expertise we won't have anyone left here with long term experience (the ones with the most will retire, and no one will replace them).

    14. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The distinction is that with free/open software every one of the people - oversees and here - can be productive and add enough value to justify their jobs. This is the "not a zero sum game" part refered to by the grandparent post.

      With the proprietary work (like at microsoft) only one team will be assigned a given task; so indeed the more expensive (read, better educated) worker is really unnecessary. This is the "is a zero sum game" the grandparent mentioned.

    15. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the "all of Slashdot speaks with one voice" fallacy
      You and the fellow monkey who modded you up must be new here. Or truly clueless asshats.

      The obvious fact is that this community is almost completely homogenous in thought on certain topics, such as MS. To pretend the obvious is not so:
      1. Works on very few people
      2. So only really shows what a lame jerk you are
    16. Re:I don't get it. by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      But for-profit software development is an artificially inflated industry.. Software can be produced at little or no cost and doesn't deserve the high prices that are being charged, especially for mass market software. It will get commoditized naturally, as did hardware (which is now much cheaper and far more powerfull than it was 20 years ago)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    17. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I apologise for the strong language but ;
                                                          What the Dickens ? there are a large number of Pro-Miocrosoft people here , they are perhaps genuine or trolls .There is fierce debates over licenses and copyright ethics.
      Slashdot make have consensus on a great many issues but it is never a total consensus even on those issues with a majority support falling to one side or the other.

    18. Re:I don't get it. by manavendra · · Score: 1

      that's a half assed comment if I ever saw one. Having worked as a developer in India, USA and UK for the last 10 years, I can tell you some of these "overseas" or "onshore" developers/managers that I have worked with try to pass-off a random doodle as "specification", or are wary of following better sofware life-cycle management processes because "there is no time", or do not want to undertake tedious, reptitive work because "it is cheaper to get it done elsewhere", but like you, that's not the point I want to make

      When you say "the government has been shipping money and expertise overseas at an unreal rate", I would like to invite you to share your sources. The only money and resources that we hear of are the troops and their rations being shipped to Iraq in the search of WMD, dethroning the "nexus of evil" in exchange of soil.

      If your government is as dyed-in-wool as you make it out to be, then would you care to explain why it took them a week to respond to the biggest natural calamity...within your own country?

      You quote umemployment deficits, I quote trade-quotes, the double-standards of free trade (in the name of protecting local interests), and the politics of economic sanctions

      And while your lamenting and crying out loud about the loss of jobs to the "skilled" workers, do you want to ever present the facts or just jump the bandwagon because someone told you outsourcing is a bad thing?

      You are happy that you can get the cheapest, use-and-throw products at your Walmart, god forbid if you have to pay two dollars extra for the bread from the local bakery, because, heck thats not your "skilled" job of course

      What you need to wake up to, is the reality that markets do not have the promise of the golden pot-at-the-end-of-rainbow anymore

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
    19. Re:I don't get it. by drsquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When people from all over the world can write for Linux, it's a good thing.

      When people from all over the world can write for Microsoft, it's a bad thing, because Americans should get all the jobs?

      I don't follow. What's so special about Americans that they should get all the jobs? Doesn't sound like that's a very healthy situation.

      What would be the repsonse if jobs were being outsourced to Britain or Australia?

    20. Re:I don't get it. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      The Chinese and Indians are free to open all the companies they want to employ their own people. They don't need American companies coming there to have jobs.

      And Americans are free to open all the companies they want to employ their own people. They don't need Microsoft to use a nationalistic hiring policy to give them jobs.

    21. Re:I don't get it. by adtifyj · · Score: 1

      I dont know how you read into my post that I was advocating that [Americans] should get all the jobs.

      Try re-reading my post without assuming that I am an american. you insensitive clod (sorry, I couldnt resist).

      If there is any pro-American spin on my post, it would be that I am happy that the America job market benefits from open source; because open source is not a zero-sum game; an American job in open source improves the number of open source jobs in other countries. While it is possible that the amount of open source work will become limited in the future, maybe when free/libre, feature complete, stable solutions exist for all problems known to man, Im sure I will be dead by then.

      Regarding the Microsoft's supposed offshoring, it could be considered bad, not because of its affects on American jobs, but because outsourcing overseas affects Microsofts shareholders. The article was eluding to the situation that CS grads are not as prevalent, and that is hurting MS' R&D division in Redmond. Here is a hint for them, offshoring is not going to help! Paying your staff in real hard cash rather than shares will! And another one: "an Access database to track the health history of people in the village" is not going to encourage CS grads to join the company.
      (BillG: google Google to find out how to increase R&D personnel)

    22. Re:I don't get it. by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      The US has had a huge trade deficit for years - they have been importing much, much more than they have been exporting. And paying for those things with dollars.

      So people outside the US got a lot of dollars. What have they been doing with that? Investing it in the US. That is, buying up your companies.

      Many (most?) large companies in the US aren't exactly American anymore.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    23. Re:I don't get it. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      When people from all over the world can write for Microsoft, it's a bad thing, because Americans should get all the jobs?

      I don't follow. What's so special about Americans that they should get all the jobs? Doesn't sound like that's a very healthy situation.

      How about because it is jobs currently being done by Americans (you know, the workers that made Microsoft the success it is) that are being identified and sent offshore in an apparent quid pro quo for Chinese cooperation.

      What would be the repsonse if jobs were being outsourced to Britain or Australia?

      What difference does it make where the jobs are going? It's still bad for American workers. What would the response be if British or Australian companies started dumping local employees and shipping their jobs to America? It probably wouldn't be too popular.

    24. Re:I don't get it. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      How about because it is jobs currently being done by Americans (you know, the workers that made Microsoft the success it is) that are being identified and sent offshore in an apparent quid pro quo for Chinese cooperation.

      So what? No-one has a right to a job, no-one owes anyone a living, Microsoft is not a charity. If someone can do your job cheaper than you, that's just tough. I'm sure if a Chinese company was looking to employ Americans they wouldn't think about the poor unemployed Chinese.

      Anyway even an unemployed American has it better than most Chinese. I won't be shedding any tears. Sell the giant TV and that's a year's worth of food right there. Sell the gas-guzzling SUV and you've enough money to spend months, or years looking for a new job. Perhaps you don't really need that 6-bedroom house in Silicon Valley with a 10 acre garden, three garages and four bathrooms.

      What difference does it make where the jobs are going? It's still bad for American workers.

      And good for Chinese workers. Overall, no-one loses out. It's no different between a company sacking someone and replacing him. There's the same number of jobs as before. It makes no difference to me whether an American or a Chinaman gets a job. If I were American I'd love it if other Americans' jobs were outsourced, would mean I would have relatively more money.

      It's just thinly-disguised racism. I bet if a company from New York employed people in Chicago because it was cheaper to do business there, there wouldn't be an outcry about them not employing New Yorkers, putting them out of jobs, there wouldn't be endless complaining about them shafting the people who made them successful in the first place, they'd just get on with it.

      A lot of the places hit by outsourcing are just too expensive. Why pay $100k a year for a prima donna in Redmond when you can get the same work for $20k in India? If American's wages all went down, and the cost of living went down, outsourcing wouldn't be a problem. But then it's in the American psyche to be better and richer than everyone else. Hubris is your downfall.

    25. Re:I don't get it. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      His entire point is that the government sucks for letting any of this happen. Regarding the recent calamity. The problem is caring about Americans doesn't seem to be as noble as caring about foreigners to an American politician. These are the people that worship the theory that the government does not exist to serve the American people. BTW, WAL-MART is probably one of the most evil corporations that ever existed. They have single-handedly destroyed more of the economy than any entity in our history. As if minimum-wage and working people an hour short of what they need to get benefits wasn't bad enough, they even use illegal workers to gain an advantage and kill off local economies...

    26. Re:I don't get it. by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
      Your response to that lowbrow is most excellent. You have pointed out, in so many words, that an economy (our national one, for instance) should be a loop - but when it is turned into a downward tube - nothing will return and things will keep going down the tube with drastic results.

      More and more, the only "opportunities" available are to find more ingenious ways to dumster dive and find scraps of food. The USA has long since entered the "third-world" phase, it is only a matter of time until economic meltdown.

    27. Re:I don't get it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Big difference - with Linux, the international help *helps* me with my job - with Microsoft the international help *competes* with me for my job.
      In other words, the yardstick to be applied is: what's in it for me?

      So much for FOSS idealism!

    28. Re:I don't get it. by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      When you say "the government has been shipping money and expertise overseas at an unreal rate", I would like to invite you to share your sources.

      Sources? I live this stuff first hand. I develop ICs for a living. When we shut down a design center here in the US and ship our schematics, layouts, processing equipment, lithography equipment (the high end stuff mind you, not the 20year old crap) off to China, we are indeed exporting our technical expertise along with our jobs. I see this stuff happening all around me, all the time. CEOs shut down design centers here and outsource them to save a few bucks on employment costs, ignoring the fact that they just shipped the family jewels off to their future competitor.

      If your government is as dyed-in-wool as you make it out to be, then would you care to explain why it took them a week to respond to the biggest natural calamity...within your own country?

      An offtopic comment, but thats the point, our government is not as "dyed-in-wool" as it should be. I think the US govt should be a bit more patriotic to its own people, and put its own people first just like every other country on the planet does.

      You quote umemployment deficits, I quote trade-quotes, the double-standards of free trade (in the name of protecting local interests), and the politics of economic sanctions

      I don't know why you think the US govt should not protect its own local interests, ahead of the global economy. Not only should it protect its own interests, it should be aggressive in its policies about doing so. Right now we export jobs and technical skill, while letting China manipulate its currency to insure large trade defecits. Who exactly is this benefitting? Its sacrificing the long term outlook of our country for the short term corporate gain.

      And while your lamenting and crying out loud about the loss of jobs to the "skilled" workers, do you want to ever present the facts or just jump the bandwagon because someone told you outsourcing is a bad thing?

      Do I need a government survey to tell me what things I see first hand are a bad thing? Why don't you stop jumping on the CNN bandwagon of CEOs spewing drivel that outsourcing is a "good" thing, because its not. Its sacrificing long term outlook for short term gain. CEOs don't outsource jobs because the result they get back is "better", they outsource it because its cheaper. They don't care what kind of worthless nonsense an overseas project team generates, as long as the bottom line looks like its done cheaper. Another example of a myopic viewpoint, making the balance sheet look good now while having no products developed to sell later.

      You are happy that you can get the cheapest, use-and-throw products at your Walmart, god forbid if you have to pay two dollars extra for the bread from the local bakery, because, heck thats not your "skilled" job of course

      What a meandering bunch of nonsense that comment is, it contradicts the rest of your post. If outsourcing was such a good thing it only increases the amount of cheap "use-and-throw" products.

      What you need to wake up to...

      ...is that your comment crossed from ontopic, to offtopic, to nonsense.

    29. Re:I don't get it. by JPriest · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you don't really need that 6-bedroom house in Silicon Valley with a 10 acre garden, three garages and four bathrooms.

      That is a pretty unrealistic perception of how people here live. Most CEO's could barely afford a place like that in Silicon Valley. With a title "Senior Software Developer" you would lucky to be able to afford a 2 bedroom apartment and food in Silicon Valley. After paying taxes to the "Team America World Police" a household income of 100K is about what is required to live comfortably even in a rural area.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    30. Re:I don't get it. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Sell the giant TV and that's a year's worth of food right there. Sell the gas-guzzling SUV and you've enough money to spend months, or years looking for a new job. Perhaps you don't really need that 6-bedroom house in Silicon Valley with a 10 acre garden, three garages and four bathrooms.

      I don't have a giant tv, nor do I have a suv, I haven't even driven the last several months. I only have one bedroom in a small apartment and the building sits on maybe half an acre, more like 1/4. Nor do I have a garage, when I had my car I had to park on the street. Heck, I don;t even have a driveway to park in. Which is why I haven't been driving. Apparently I was issued some parking tickets I was never given and didn't find out about them until I was pulled over and given a ticket for driving with a suspended license. The officer gave me a number to call and when I did I was told about these tickets that weren't paid for so my license was suspended. If I were working maybe I could of paid for the tickets when I found out about them, but I've been on disability and haven't worked in years.

      If I were American I'd love it if other Americans' jobs were outsourced, would mean I would have relatively more money.

      Have you ever had your job outsourced? If you did I bet you didn't like it and if you haven't when it happens the same, bet you won't like it.

      Falcon
    31. Re:I don't get it. by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      No-one has a right to a job, no-one owes anyone a living, Microsoft is not a charity.

      If you'd RTFAs that were linked, you'd see that it is Microsoft that expects charity in the form of government sponsored research. It is also pressing to legalize the incredible inevitable disclosure doctrine which would make any MS employee a de facto indentured servant, unable to work for a different employer.

      Sell the giant TV and that's a year's worth of food right there. Sell the gas-guzzling SUV and you've enough money to spend months, or years looking for a new job. Perhaps you don't really need that 6-bedroom house in Silicon Valley with a 10 acre garden, three garages and four bathrooms.

      I don't have anywhere near that kind of stuff. You live in a fantasy world, but that's obvious from your comments.

      If I were American I'd love it if other Americans' jobs were outsourced, would mean I would have relatively more money.

      What if you're the person whose job is outsourced - how does that help you? And it doesn't help other Americans. Anyone who becomes a drain on the national economy brings the standard of living down for everyone else through higher taxes and a general reduction in economic activity.

      It's just thinly-disguised racism.

      I am so sick of people who can't make a rational defense of their argument, so they start screaming "racism". You conveniently ignored the rest of my comment where I pointed out that it doesn't matter which country the jobs go to. Perhaps you don't understand the difference between racism and nationalism?

      Why pay $100k a year for a prima donna in Redmond when you can get the same work for $20k in India?

      I can't speak about wages in Redmond, but why should Microsoft take the job of a person who helped build the company and ship it elsewhere? Is MS about to go out of business? Did they lose that $40 billion in the bank? Their income increased by a whopping 50% last year. How much of their success does MS owe to the Chinese? You globalist apologists are a constant source of amusement.

    32. Re:I don't get it. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      You and the fellow monkey who modded you up must be new here.

      Well, it's only been a few years, but I've obviously been here longer than you. If my UID wasn't lower than yours, you wouldn't have posted AC.

    33. Re:I don't get it. by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      Quiet you! We don't like being told of our logical fallacies and Econ101-level mistakes!

    34. Re:I don't get it. by manavendra · · Score: 1

      I was hoping your response would have something meaningul, but sadly, its as bad as the original post. Go back to your moaning, and nonsense

      --
      http://efil.blogspot.com/
  5. Nothing new for companies as large as MS by dauthur · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

    That's called "marketing". Microsoft cries shortage, geeks raise their hands like an eager student with an answer in class. I sure as hell would take a job from Microsoft if given the opprotunity. I'd surely go to hell for it as well, but fact is... Microsoft is on top, and will be for a long time. With top-rung knowledge and experience, one can definitely sprint to retirement well before 99% of the people that (s)he graduated with from secondary school.

    Other thing is, China has a lot of people. And a lot of smart people. Survey says: Cheap labour and lots of it.

    1. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Raul654 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Microsoft is on top, and will be for a long time."
       
      I find this statement very questionable. Microsoft is big, rich, and entrenched. Those are pretty much their only virtues. On the other hand, when was the last time you heard anyone talking about a Microsoft product in anything but a lament? When was the last time you heard people eagerly talking about Microsoft's next move, like you hear so often with Google nowadays. Microsoft doesn't get the pick of the talent anymore, either. Microsoft only has two successful products - Windows and Office. Quite frankly, I think Microsoft is at the beginning of the same kind of decline that the industry has seen so often from the former giants like DEC and HP and IBM (before IBM re-invented itself)

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
    2. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find this statement very questionable. Microsoft is big, rich, and entrenched.

      Not only that, but big and rich doesn't mean you'll stay on top for a long time, at least not when you're a publicly-traded company.

      Back in 1984 or so, IBM was the big player in the PC space. IBM was, and still is, a huge company. Someone back then may have also assumed that IBM would stay on top of the PC market for a long time, but look what happened to them. It took them a long time to recover from the "attack of the clones", and even then they never regained top-dog status, and just recently gave up altogether by selling that division off to the Chinese company Lenovo.

      Big companies can go from market leader to market loser or even bankrupt in a very short time.

    3. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >but fact is... Microsoft is on top, and will be
      >for a long time.

      I respectfully beg to differ sir. I would say
      that google is on top now, and that is why
      we are seeing tantrums like Ballmers and this
      lawsuit over Lee.

      --Johhny.
      P.s. Given the choice of which 2 places to work
      at (Microsoft vs. Google) I know hands down which
      place I would choose and why.

      Working at google means that I get the freedom
      to work on my projects, I get to work with
      some cool intelligent folks, and I don't have
      to deal with brainless marketing folks getting
      in the way of good technology.

    4. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not really true. IBM might have been a big player in PC space, yet PC space was insignificant at the time. It's like saying Microsoft is in the market of fabricating mice. True, but hopelessly inadequate.

      A more apt comparison would be to say that IBM was a huge player in the mainframe market. And where are they now? They're still a huge player in the mainframe market. It is just that this market has slowly eroded, and IBM is slowly changing to accommodate this. Likewise, only when the PC market will dwindle does Microsoft have anything to fear. Finally, 40 billion dollars go a long way for living through hard times. Don't count on Microsoft going away in the next few decades.

    5. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm tired of posting this, but I'll do it again, just to make it clear...

      That 40 billion dollars is owned by the shareholders. Shareholders expect a return, whether on capital growth, or returns as dividends.

      If Microsoft stop performing well, the shares will drop in price, unless they make payouts to shareholders (who would think it's a good investment). Shareholders will start coveting that large stash of money and demanding a piece of it.

      That 40 billion could disappear in a second, from out of the company into the pockets of shareholders.

    6. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      ...one can definitely sprint to retirement well before 99% of the people...
      What a shallow incentive.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    7. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by slashdotnickname · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, when was the last time you heard anyone talking about a Microsoft product in anything but a lament?

      When was the last time you heard anyone talk about how well their refrigerator cools food?

      To most people, a computer is just another gadget. A gadget that works and not thought much else about, like a phone or a tv.

      This perception is best illustrated when a computer is crippled by viruses or spyware. To a techy, it's like a puppy is dying... but others just see the computer as "broken".

    8. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Well, if you would take a job from M$ you WOULD go to hell. I think Microsoft is right over its top. Just as with other company's (eg. AT&T, IBM, AOL...)they had their moment of fast rising, fame and money, they will stay pretty big but have to cut in costs, get rid of some departments and start looking for long-term investments and get lost on the home-market. Proof for this "prediction": They are including more and more services so they can interoperate with other systems (Unix Services) People leave for other company's (like Google) They start cutting on people and moving to other places (like this post states) They start pushing off some applications into the opensource fields They get more and more critique and are not the all-holy one anymore not only by geeks but also by big media and also internally They try grabbing pieces of market they are not active in and they can't quite push it through (Games, mobile)

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      I find this statement very questionable

      In any case, you could make more money riding MS's descent, then most companies ascent.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    10. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because completely draining the company's coffers/cushion of funds will really give them a return when the company needs it and doesn't have it and collapses into bankruptcy.

    11. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1
      Ok, didn't realize Microsoft is 100% floating and apparently never read it before (so keep on repeating). Nevertheless, for Microsoft to fail quickly, the PC market should almost have to evaporate overnight. This is simply not going to happen. Maybe that Microsoft is marginalized in one/two decades, but that's about the best I can imagine.

      What do you think the shareholders use to track their investments?

    12. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that mickeysoft will be dead in 10 years. Set your watch, starting now. 10 years and BillG will be found disheveled, lying beside a dumpster on the Seattle waterfront, with what looks like the heel of a prostitutes boot sticking out of his ear. People wandering by muttering sayings about 'easy come, easy go'. Bill and Steve both know that M$ is done. It's all over now but they crying. I double-dog-dare you to read their SEC filings. Even they admit their predicted revenue is dropping, and forecast to drop even further.

    13. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If the company appears to be headed for bankruptcy anyway, the investors will want their money back. Investors don't care about the company surviving or not; they're not emotionally tied to it.

      The reason we buy stock is as an investment. We buy part of the company with the expectation that we will get a return on our investment, either with dividends or with increasing stock price, or both. If a company's performance diminishes, its stock price will decrease as potential investors see it as a worse investment, and are not willing to pay as much for its shares. People who already hold shares while the price is falling will demand that something be done by management so that they lose as little money as possible. If that means dissolving the company and giving all its money back to the shareholders, then that's what they'll do (and if they don't, they'll have a shareholder lawsuit on their hands).

      Public companies aren't like private ones. Some old guy running the local hardware store can stay in business as long as he pleases if that's what he wants to do with his business, even if he's losing money. If he wants to squander his life savings trying to compete against the new Home Depot, hoping that eventually customers will come back to him, that's his choice. Public companies don't work this way. The board of directors answers to the shareholders, and if they don't like the way things are going, they'll make a change.

    14. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by StarsAreAlsoFire · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, when was the last time you heard anyone talking about a Microsoft product in anything but a lament?

      OneNote is incredible.

      What company did they buy to get it? Anyone? ;~)

    15. Re:Nothing new for companies as large as MS by dauthur · · Score: 1

      Well, considering how minimal I live... Yes. It's shallow, so am I. In a capitalistic society, you need money and having a lot of it means you die comfortably.

  6. Re:And this is a suprise because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seriously. Bill Gates is about as genuine as all the emails I get from PayPal wanting to verify my account.

  7. I feel like a spectator... by Mudcathi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... at a game between Go masters, and white just removed a bunch of black stones from the board

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

    1. Re:I feel like a spectator... by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is fitting that you should say that cause Bill Gates is quite an accomplished Go player. Anyone who wants to understand how Go is used as a strategy particularly how that strategy influences strategic thought should read this paper.

  8. Oh yes... by Michael_Munks · · Score: 0

    And it will turn out this is all part of The Brain's grand skeem to take over the world. Narf, -Pinky

  9. Oh no! by AkaXakA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OMG! A global company is hiring people globaly!

    People really, really need to put this into perspective.

    1. Re:Oh no! by dauthur · · Score: 1

      I think that companies could definitely make some serious money off of this! It's such a wonderful idea! :O

  10. Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Time for another round of "oh no, all our jobs are going to [insert country here]". Oh gebus. Spare me How many years of offshoring scaremongering do I have to put up with? I remember it from the 80s.

    *sigh*

    1. Re:Oh dear. by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 1

      Spare me How many years of offshoring scaremongering do I have to put up with?

      DMouse: This is your boss. Please report to work bright and early on Tuesday morning for training. You'll be doing the training... of your Chinese replacement.

    2. Re:Oh dear. by Dicky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I offshored myself.

      Until early this year, I worked for Sun in the UK. They decided, in their infinite lack-of-wisdom, to close my office and lay everyone off (and have been trying to hire some people back ever since realising what a stupid move that was), pretty much because they thought they could replace us with much cheaper employees in Bejing.

      So I went and got myself a job in Hong Kong - like Bejing, only a lot more expensive, widely English-speaking, and bloody civilised :-) And, no joking, I'm off to hear RMS speak here in a few minutes - I'm interested more in the reaction to him from the audience than what he has to say - not because I'm not interested in what he has to say, but because I've heard him say it before...

      --
      Paranoia isn't an infectious condition, it's a way of life
    3. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and that was for outsourcing all the factory jobs e.g. car assembly. You'll notice that very few manufacturing jobs are now in the US compared to back before the '80s too. This is because it was outsourced. Now that countries like India and China are getting competitive in white collar industries those jobs are going to start disappearing too. Before long the only jobs left will be government and shelf stacking jobs, the sort of things that can't be outsourced. Hope you enjoy it...

    4. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Been there, done that. Watched said company flame out. I'm still working. Embrace change. It's good for you.

    5. Re:Oh dear. by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      In the 70s, 80s and 90s there were many, many COBOL jobs. Now there are virtually none. There are still plenty of COBOL-based mainframe systems about but most of the work is now done in India. So off-shoring has removed some work. Why wouldn't this happen to developers of any other languages. Certainly something like VB could be shifted abroad at the drop of a hat and it wouldn't be too great a stretch to see other programming jobs disappearing east as well.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    6. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cavalier attitude and cynicism are certainly outgrowths of your experience. Think about that a little.

    7. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      You still want to work in Cobol or VB?

    8. Re:Oh dear. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      Change in this case means fewer and lower paying jobs.

      There are now no more emerging industries coming. The tech industry is the last big job boom America will ever see except in the low paying service industry.

      Plus we are now totally vulnerable to intellectual property theft and identity fraud against our citizens by foreign criminals who are inherently immune to FBI prosecution.

      The cheese has been moved and there is less of it and more mice competing.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    9. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      Change in this case means fewer and lower paying jobs.

      Yes, because there is a limited set of work to be done. Uhuh.

      No. There is no limit to the amount of software that needs to be written. I can think of five or six desktop apps, about twenty webservices, and a fistful of embedded devices I need/want/desire.

      Get out there and start being creative for chrissakes. Stop whinging that the invisible "them" is responsible for your misfortunes. It is all down to you. Anything else is a cop out.

    10. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intellectual "property" IS theft, you infofascist fucker.

    11. Re:Oh dear. by panaceaa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Are Beijing and Hong Kong really that similar? I'm sure there's very nice parts of Beijing, but I'd expect it to be somewhat like Mexico City (which also has nice parts). Hong Kong seems more like London or NYC.

      Can someone who's been to Beijing and Hong Kong (or lives there!) enlighten me?

    12. Re:Oh dear. by Nept · · Score: 1

      They are becoming more similar. Beijing is becoming better, Hong Kong is becoming worse.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    13. Re:Oh dear. by tgd · · Score: 1

      People who aren't all that good at their job, and conciously or subconciously know it are panicked about the possibility their job may be outsourced. Unfortunately these days, half the people who claim to be software engineers fall into that camp.

      The moral is be good at your job. And if you can't be in the top half of people doing a job that is so easily mobile, you ought to pick a trade career that is less likely to be outsourced.

      And like you say, its no different now than any time else in recent history (certainly going back 50 or 60 years).

      I suspect that /.'s active posting population is skewed fairly young... college students and people just starting out who haven't established themselves in their career and are more concerned and vocal about it.

    14. Re:Oh dear. by bladernr · · Score: 1
      The tech industry is the last big job boom America will ever see except in the low paying service industry

      Same was said during the phase of factory automation in the 1930's - 1940's. There was even legislation proposed to outlaw factory automation (can't seem to find link, however, sorry, someone have it?). Then America rocketed to the front of world economy in the post-WW2 boom of the 1950's. Predicting the future is a risky business.

      I just read a story in the past 2 months about European drug makers outsourcing R&D to the US - not because of costs, but to get at better talent. The next "big boom" is probably Biotech. The US is also a HUGE exporter of services. If the US outlawed the import/export of services (so software jobs would stop going to China/India), the US would be the loser. Any idea the amount of engineering, research, civil design, and international legal work is outsourced to the US? What about R&D? As examples, do you know that both Japan's giant NTT and France Telecom run R&D labs in the US?

      I struggle to have an opinion about whether or not the "software boom" is over, or just had a blip. History teaches me that any attempt I or anyone else make to predict it either way will be about as accurate as flipping a coin.

      I was promised flying cars by now (1950), the Soviets owning most of the world (1965), and Japan was supposed to have taken over the US (1985). I guess now I should fret about China and India.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    15. Re:Oh dear. by hanssprudel · · Score: 1


      I've been to Beijing and Hong Kong, but unfortunately I have not been to Mexico City, so I cannot quite evalualte your comparison.

      Hong Kong is a like a European or American city in many ways (especially on the island), but there is still an element of asian street life. Beijing today is a lot richer and more developed than it was just a few years ago, and thus more like HK (or NYC or New York) than most third world cities. But it is still dirty, and you can still feel the presense of a dictatorial non-pluralist government (in a way you don't in HK).

    16. Re:Oh dear. by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Actually, 'slashdot's active posting population' is people who sit around at work reading slashdot. IOW: people who SHOULD be the most worried. Hence there tends to be a lot of frantic screaming in these parts.

      Also, a lot of OSS is produced from 'surplus labor.' Your boss hired you to get specific tasks that he has on a GANTT chart completed. If you spend 15% of the time reading mailing lists and diddling around with code for an OSS project unrelated to your work, you're deadweight to your employer.

      --
      resigned
    17. Re:Oh dear. by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Oh gebus. Spare me How many years of offshoring scaremongering do I have to put up with? I remember it from the 80s.
      And now all the people who had good manufacturing jobs up until the 80s have joined the ranks of the working poor, performing menial service jobs. The gap between rich and poor has widened, and poverty is on the rise.

      So what is your point?

    18. Re:Oh dear. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't think your solution scales. Most other countries don't just hand out work visas like plane tickets. Plus, what do you do when your visa runs out?

    19. Re:Oh dear. by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Since it's impossible to get a job in anything else due to my lack of experience in any fashionable technology (15 years of systems development notwithstanding) I'd take a COBOL job tomorrow should one ever appear.
      I can take any number of courses and/or work on any number of OSS projects but at the end of the day if I have no corporate development experience in C++/Java/Visual C#.NET or whatever then I'm looking for an entirely new career since I have no IT degree and don't have the time to do one at night school or money to return to university full-time.
      VB at least might be a route back into IT, I'm not going to overlook it just because it's not considered cool on Slashdot.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    20. Re:Oh dear. by MorePower · · Score: 1

      Hey how did you immigrate to HK? I would dearly love to live there, but it didn't seem like it would be possible to immigrate and even if I did, I doubt I could find work there.

    21. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      DO you know which country has lost the most manufacturing jobs in the last 20 years? China. The cause? American automation techniques and technologies.

      Manufacturing jobs are taking the same arc that farming jobs took over a hundred years ago with the widespread adoption of farm machinery. The same mass unemployment that actually created the pool of idle labour that fed the industrial revolution.

      It's all down to whether the underemployed are going to continue to blame others for their misfortune, and thus not take responsibility for their situation, or if they take responsibility and decide to find something new to do.

      Will be interesting to see which is the more prevalent approach.

    22. Re:Oh dear. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Time for another round of "oh no, all our jobs are going to [insert country here]". Oh gebus. Spare me How many years of offshoring scaremongering do I have to put up with? I remember it from the 80s.

      Yes, like you, I remember all the scaremongering about the textile, garment, steel, and electronics industries. Heh, what a joke. Oh wait . . . that all really happened.

    23. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      There is a real difference between being a coder and a worker in a steel mill. In a steel mill, you are completely dependant on the mill owner continuing to decide to keep the mill operational. Mills are expensive pieces of capital equipment.

      Whereas, being a coder doesn't take a lot of capital at all. In fact, I have the only real capital asset required on my lap right now...

    24. Re:Oh dear. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      The problem is no one in the US will be making those embedded devices any more. People overseas will do it for pennies on your dollar.

      You can be as creative as you want but you will never as long as you live ace someone doing the same thing for pennies on your dollar.

      You never did refute the fact that the majority of new jobs, as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, are low paying service jobs. Read the July 2005 report if you disagree.

      Your twenty webservices and fist full of embedded devices will most likely be produced in Chinese factories and programmed by India Institute of Technology-educated 5 dollar a day graduates.

      So much for the value of your creativity.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    25. Re:Oh dear. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      People who aren't all that good at their job, and conciously or subconciously know it are panicked about the possibility their job may be outsourced. Unfortunately these days, half the people who claim to be software engineers fall into that camp.

      It is not just programmers but also EEs that have high unemployment and are seeing their jobs offshored. It is hardly a panic; it is the acknowledgement of the current situation.

      And if you can't be in the top half of people doing a job that is so easily mobile, you ought to pick a trade career that is less likely to be outsourced.

      Being in the top half has nothing to do with it when the CEO decides s/he needs a news flash to boost those stock options into profitable territory, and some offshoring will fit the bill. Given your approach, it looks like plumbing and sanitation engineering are the new, hot, job growth prospects for the US.

      I suspect that /.'s active posting population is skewed fairly young... college students and people just starting out who haven't established themselves in their career and are more concerned and vocal about it.

      You're half right, but the demographic doesn't indicate who is posting. It is the older workers that are being displaced in favor of less expensive younger workers and foreign workers.

    26. Re:Oh dear. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      [I just read a story in the past 2 months about European drug makers outsourcing R&D to the US - not because of costs, but to get at better talent.]
      And what makes you think no one will look at those India Institute of Technology graduates? What makes you think the US is the only source of better talent?

      We are seeing a drop in the number of American students enrolling in the sciences because they don't think a degree in those fields can pay their rent and bills. Where, then, is the talent coming from?

      [The next "big boom" is probably Biotech. The US is also a HUGE exporter of services. If the US outlawed the import/export of services (so software jobs would stop going to China/India), the US would be the loser. Any idea the amount of engineering, research, civil design, and international legal work is outsourced to the US? What about R&D? As examples, do you know that both Japan's giant NTT and France Telecom run R&D labs in the US?]

      Biotech, you say?
      Funny, how I was just reading about how biotech is being offshored to India.
      http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/775 563.cms
      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/ a/2004/04/18/MNGBM672L01.DTL&type=printable

      And I bet you more engineering work is offshored from the US to elsewhere, than vice versa.

      There's a reason why the US runs a trade deficit with the entire world. We're net importing goods and net exporting jobs.

      Now exactly what services are we exporting, and how many jobs does that entail? Do you have any hard numbers to back this up?

      Now I've shown you documentation about biotech being offshored. I would prefer you afford me the courtesy of backing up your claims with some hard evidence.

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    27. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      If you can't utilise your intelligence to such a level that justifies why you should be paid so much more than those of us out here in the real world, I really don't see a problem with you failing. Really. Welcome to the real world.

      Hint: I'm an Australian, I have both taken outsourced work from the US, and had my job outsourced to india. And, by god, we have been hit with some horrid trade deals thanks to the US of A. Really.

      So, the question is, are you going to fight, or are you going to sit there and moan like some wussy girl's blouse?

    28. Re:Oh dear. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      There is a real difference between being a coder and a worker in a steel mill. In a steel mill, you are completely dependant on the mill owner continuing to decide to keep the mill operational. Mills are expensive pieces of capital equipment.

      Your analysis is shallow. The company itself is the major expense. Equipment and facilities are usually a one-time expense and deductible while in the country. Moving established manufacturing businesses offshore has no benefit other than a possible long-term saving from cheaper labor.

      However, all that has nothing to do with your scaremongering claim. Let's stay on topic. It has happened before, and the warnings were not scaremongering. It is happening again. To paraphrase Huxley, the fact that we do not learn from history is its most important lesson - one we never actually learn. It's somewhat ironic that you got modded up for proving Huxley right.

    29. Re:Oh dear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You apparently didn't study. You stayed in a fundamentally dead technology with no development future. Java was open to you, C and C++ were open to you, databases were open to you, HTML and PHP and security and systems work were open to you. VB is not a route back into real work, it's a route to another dead-end technology.

      I have no degree in computer work, my degree is in molecular biology, but I just got 2 job offers from work I did in the last 10 years in fax/modem software and in backup systems because my name is in various developer's notes and old FAQ's for stuff I did in a previous workplace, as add-ons to my core responsibilities, that I was able to cite in my applications. Your work was apparently too dead end and too dull to bother citing for new fields, and it's your own fault.

    30. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      And stuff will stop moving off shore just as soon as it becomes economically more viable to do it onshore. And that means you can either become cheaper, or more effective. Your choice.

    31. Re:Oh dear. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      The fact that you're completely and totally wrong is part of why there is a decline in people even bothering to study computer science any more, except in India and China.

      Now please, spare me your fake cowboy act. The only thing you are fighting for is your spot on your knees in front of your corporate masters who are pitting six billion people against each other for what is proven to be a shrinking number of jobs in the computer industry. (http://www.networkworld.com/careers/2004/0531mans ide.html)

      Me? I'm in school for something else now. I'm abandoning the tech industry when I graduate. You're free to continue your "fight" for the suite room on the Titanic.

      In 20 years there won't be anyone working for IT in your country or mine. Except for corporate Execs, of course. Or do you have another explanation for why there are now fewer people working in IT?

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    32. Re:Oh dear. by tgd · · Score: 1

      Being a good engineer means even if a company does outsource development, finding more work is easy, even during a down market. Good means good at selling yourself, as well as good at your job.

      And yes, plumbing is a pretty good option, and it does kids a disservice to suggest otherwise. 40 hours a week, eighty grand a year, no possibility of outsourcing, and you get to work with your hands.

      A lot of engineers can't do as well.

    33. Re:Oh dear. by DMouse · · Score: 1

      Heh. I suspect you guys are harder hit in the US because of your CxO's tendency to be lemmings, compared to slightly more conservative CxO's out here in Aus.

      Sure there is less work than 2000, but there is more work than there was in '95. So, meh. I think you are just being a fatalist.

    34. Re:Oh dear. by Travoltus · · Score: 1

      That's the same as saying there's more than zero jobs so keep the band playing until they drown.

      What advantage does the ostrich have on chicken little? Answer: at least he doesn't see it coming! :)

      --
      --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    35. Re:Oh dear. by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      Yes I did study and if you'd actually read what I wrote you'd see that it's not the lack of programming skill it's the lack of experience. I took a C++ course earlier this year and got top marks, however no college course will give me the required 2 years of industry experience in that technology. Explain to me how I get that experience when I can't get a job in it in the first place.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    36. Re:Oh dear. by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Being a good engineer means even if a company does outsource development, finding more work is easy, even during a down market.

      There are plenty of good engineers out of work. Age discrinination is rampant in the industry - some companies have even been stupid enough to admit it.

      Good means good at selling yourself, as well as good at your job.

      Good salesmen are good at selling. Good engineers are good at engineering. To each his own.

      And yes, plumbing is a pretty good option, and it does kids a disservice to suggest otherwise. 40 hours a week, eighty grand a year, no possibility of outsourcing, and you get to work with your hands.

      I never suggested it wasn't a decent job. That doesn't help the people who spent years and thousands of dollars getting an education and building a career in engineering or CS. Nor is there enough room in the plumbing trade to absorb significant numbers of new workers.

  11. 1.75% of the work force by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft outsourcing 1000 jobs to China equates to about 1.75% of its work force. (57,000)

    In addition, it's very probable that most of those jobs are for non-critical, non-core projects. This frees up the local developers to work on more important projects.

    Could Microsoft hire more local workers to fill these positions? Sure... but it's hardly news that Microsoft outsources 1.75% of its workforce.

    1. Re:1.75% of the work force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This frees up the local developers to work on more important projects.

      More accurately, this frees up their desks, healthcare, and paychecks as well. And yes, they'll work on more important projects such as OpenOffice rollouts in states like Massachussetts.

    2. Re:1.75% of the work force by PrivateDonut · · Score: 1

      A little offtopic, but your realise that Microsoft's workforce is more than twice the size of Australia's defence forces... (last time I checked, about 20,000 people, but it has probably grown since then)

    3. Re:1.75% of the work force by David+Off · · Score: 1

      > Microsoft outsourcing 1000 jobs to China equates to about 1.75% of its work force. (57,000)

      > In addition, it's very probable that most of those jobs are for non-critical, non core projects.

      In other news, Microsoft hires 1,000 Chinese to work on the Windows security overhaul.

    4. Re:1.75% of the work force by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Those jobs are the *entry* jobs to the company though!

      Sure, you can hire people off the street with skills. But isn't it easier to get lesser skilled people? You put them to work in the easy jobs, and you see how they perform in your work enviroment plus the get a better idea of how to work with your IT needs.

      Now you have a pool to draw from when your higher level programmers bail, with a proven track record in the company.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:1.75% of the work force by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Microsoft offshoring 1.75% of its workforce is no big deal.

      Microsoft offshoring 1.75% of its workforce every year is a big deal.

      "'At the time of my departure, MS was on track to outsource over 1,000 jobs a year to China,' [Lee] said in a court declaration."
      Do you have any idea how quickly this adds up? Think where they'll be in ten years, or twenty.

      grumble grumble... won't even read the bloody article... grumble grumble
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:1.75% of the work force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At my company, MS has been trying to persuade us to move to .NET. They sponsored a project to convert our current Java app through their Chinese developers. It seems that they are willing to throw some low cost development resources to capture marketshare on highly speculative projects. Or perhaps train their non -core developers on consulting projects?

      It does irritate the current development staff- it is a business decision by non-technical types. Fortunately, it is likely to fail...

    7. Re:1.75% of the work force by ThinkFr33ly · · Score: 1

      Probably not... I would suspect that Microsoft hires (or acquires companies with) enough employees to make that 1000 quite a bit less than 1.75% per year.

    8. Re:1.75% of the work force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or piss off the current staff so they start looking for work elsewhere.

    9. Re:1.75% of the work force by slamdunkfan · · Score: 1

      I don't know the detail. But in Beijing Microsoft Reseach Center, they are definitly not doing entry level job. One thing I know is the digital ink technology used by Tablet PC is done there.

  12. Whistle!! by usageman · · Score: 1

    I beleive this is the start of many lawsuits between microsoft in former employees! I wonder what a whistle blower would get if he or she cashed in.

  13. Hah hah! by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And just a day or two ago, someone on Slashdot was telling me all about how at least Microsoft has never cut an American job for one overseas. Nyah nyah! :P

    So when all the jobs are outsourced and everyone around the world is making $8/hr in the new Global Economy, who is going to be able to afford $200 for an operating system? Or $500 for Office? Or $1500 for Adobe?

    1. Re:Hah hah! by gromitcode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm they haven't. This is not MS cutting US employees, they are hiring from overseas instead of hiring more from the US. So your point would be?

    2. Re:Hah hah! by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chinese are not pleased with the number of jobs being moved to China, and one of Lee's duties was to identify jobs for export.

      MOVING and EXPORTING jobs is not the same as HIRING new people for new jobs.

    3. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So when all the jobs are outsourced and everyone around the world is making $8/hr in the new Global Economy, who is going to be able to afford $200 for an operating system? Or $500 for Office? Or $1500 for Adobe?

      Things will then be as they should be. Only the most qualified people will have licenses to use the best software, as supplied to them in a controlled manner by their employers. Interns will not be allowed to use said licenses without having taken the appropriate certification seminar and passed the test. Keystrokes and mouse motions will be logged to ensure that these applications are not misused, especially Photoshop. One can only image what could happen if a program like that fell into The Wrong Hands.

      Thankfully, soon after this happens, most of the workforce will be made obsolete by automation, and will be expected to be sports about it and do themselves in. After all, we can't have anyone drawing on unemployment insurance, now can we?

    4. Re:Hah hah! by jcr · · Score: 1

      someone on Slashdot was telling me all about how at least Microsoft has never cut an American job for one overseas.

      That may still be the case. These are new jobs we're talking about in China.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And just a day or two ago, someone on Slashdot was telling me all about how at least Microsoft has never cut an American job for one overseas. Nyah nyah! :P
      Your gloating is premature. Microsoft is creating 1000 jobs in China, and isn't cutting any in America. Thus, Microsoft still hasn't cut an American job for one overseas.

      I believe my proper retort here would be: 'Nyah nyah! :P'
    6. Re:Hah hah! by tickytong · · Score: 1

      As much as I hate to agree with Mr. "Nyah nhah", I have to point out that the Chinese officials were concerned about jobs "moving" to their country, not being created. That indicates that jobs are being cut.

    7. Re:Hah hah! by gromitcode · · Score: 1

      actually in this case yes it does mean the same thing. just because the article is badly worded doesn't make it right. MS are not firing or laying off people for this, they are moving roles overseas, they do this through natural attrition, ie as people leave they do not replace them in the US.

    8. Re:Hah hah! by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      So when all the jobs are outsourced and everyone around the world is making $8/hr in the new Global Economy, who is going to be able to afford $200 for an operating system? Or $500 for Office? Or $1500 for Adobe?

      Many of them (outside the US), after all the trade deficit will make the dollar fall like a brick.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    9. Re:Hah hah! by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      and Microsoft will change their prices to 200 euros, and 500 euros to compensate...

    10. Re:Hah hah! by twitter · · Score: 1
      These are new jobs we're talking about in China.

      From the article:

      "At the time of my departure, MS was on track to outsource over 1,000 jobs a year to China," he [Kai-Fu Lee, a former vice president] said in a court declaration. A Microsoft spokeswoman said the company has transferred some projects to China "in order to free up teams here for other work."

      Other work, as in lawn work or waiting tables.

      Welcome to software ownership. Ha, ha, ha. It does not feel so good when your master puts you on the outside, now does it?

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    11. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not as such. I know someone from Asian descent (3rd generation American) who works at Microsoft, and he got transferred to China to lead a local group of programmers (working on localization, there are not enough people with the required knowledge in the USA). What the Chinese are *really* worried about is that it's Americans having the management jobs in a Chinese company.

    12. Re:Hah hah! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Which results in one less job in the states than there was yesterday and one more in China.

      Sounds like MOVING to me.

    13. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also doesn't sound like anyONE was FIRED or REPLACED to me.

    14. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So, what part of in order to free up teams here for other work did you miss? We are aware of your peculiar opinions about outsourcing, so spare us the analysis, mmmkay?

      And funny, I don't remember you posting your opinions when IBM announced it was outsourcing 14,000 jobs to India. Funny how that works.

    15. Re:Hah hah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone wasn't fired or layed off doesn't mean the job wasn't moved.

    16. Re:Hah hah! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      So when all the jobs are outsourced and everyone around the world is making $8/hr in the new Global Economy, who is going to be able to afford $200 for an operating system? Or $500 for Office? Or $1500 for Adobe?

      If Microsoft only had to pay $8/hr to its employees it wouldn't need to charge anywhere near $200 for an OS to make the same profit.

      Not that that's going to happen. There are plenty of jobs available at more than $8/hr.

    17. Re:Hah hah! by jcr · · Score: 1

      It does not feel so good when your master puts you on the outside, now does it?

      I wouldn't know. I've never been into the S&M scene, so I'll just have to take your word for it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  14. news? by cybergrunt69 · · Score: 1

    Wow, a global company is hiring globally? The only thing that makes this interesting is the fact that it apparently came to light when it was found out that google was hiring there too. So now they should be called a copycat too?

    Microsoft ships jobs outside the US, and they follow someone else's business model.
    Remind me again how this is news please?

    --
    --- "To ignore race and sex is racist and sexist!" -- Jesse Jackson
  15. Please give the man some credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Through his foundation bill has been funding us schools. Is it his fault that the whole damn country hates anyone capable of critical thinking, as well as anyone who uses words longer than 4 letters.

    1. Re:Please give the man some credit by Colonel+Panic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Through his foundation bill has been funding us schools.

      Here's a bit of critical thinking for you: Bill doesn't fund US schools per se, he's planting more seeds for expanding his empire. Kind of like the drug dealer who tells you the first hit is free.

    2. Re:Please give the man some credit by tdubya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your right, he ONLY donates over a billion dollars a year through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation... how inconsiderate of him..

      So how much do you donate to education outside of your property taxes? (assuming you don't live in your parents basement, you actually own real property, and that you are employed... very unlikely for most slashdot readers)

      --
      I read /.! I like seeing how misinformed, short sighted, and downright stupid some people are.
    3. Re:Please give the man some credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A billion dollars... worth of Windows licenses?

    4. Re:Please give the man some credit by cybergrunt69 · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe if I had so much money that I couldn't possibly spend it all myself, then I'd give a bunch of it away. Then again, I don't have a lot of money, but I still give to charities.

      OK, so he donates cash money. So what? Does the act of donating or the amount of said donations change in any way what kind of person he is? I'm not trying to troll or start a flamewar, but just because he gives away some money doesn't make him any better or worse...

      --
      --- "To ignore race and sex is racist and sexist!" -- Jesse Jackson
    5. Re:Please give the man some credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course it doesn't change the kind of person he is. It shows the kind of person he is, in part. There are a lot of reasons he could be doing it, of course - good PR, good morals, both, neither, etc. - and we can argue about that. But he's doing it because of who he is, his actions merely express that, they don't change it.

      I do want to add that I have more respect for a person who voluntarily gives money than a person who forces another to give ten times as much. (There's a saying along those lines, but I don't remember it.) Charity is far preferable to redistribution of wealth. This goes more directly to your real point. Does charity necessarily mean one is generous (and morally good)? No. But it sure is indicative. At a certain point, it seems to me you have to admit that Gates is, like everybody else, a complex human being, with favorable and unfavorable traits. I don't see why it's so difficult to imagine he's both a ruthless businessman and someone who cares deeply about his fellow man. After all, there are a great many people who genuinely believe that capitalism is the best way to, in the long run, help everyone. Gates may well be one of them, or he may have his own alternate philosophy which follows a similar path. It doesn't have to be inconsistent. And that's the context in which we should be having discussions re: Gates, frankly. We don't know him, how on Earth are we supposed to judge his morals? Judge his actions, try to extrapolate reasons for them, and discuss them. But I am now well-off topic, so I'll leave it at that.

    6. Re:Please give the man some credit by Lillesvin · · Score: 1

      Is that you, Bill? ;-p

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    7. Re:Please give the man some credit by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      If you think Microsoft gives back even 1% of what it takes from local school budgets every year, then you and the moderators are clearly taking hits from the same crack pipe.

      Repeat after me: Microsoft is a net drain on education funds.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Please give the man some credit by kwatz · · Score: 1

      Not to mention people that use proper punctuation or the correct words to signify possesion. Man, I hate those people!

    9. Re:Please give the man some credit by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      So how much do you donate to education outside of your property taxes? (assuming you don't live in your parents basement, you actually own real property, and that you are employed... very unlikely for most slashdot readers)

      So donation is good, even if the money was raised using questionable business practices? Or, to exaggerate a little, it's OK to steal if you give the money to charity?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    10. Re:Please give the man some credit by tdubya · · Score: 1

      Do you think he get's paid over 1 billion dollars a year working at Microsoft? Alot of his money comes from investing activities, etc... If that's questionable business practice, you might move to a third world country where they don't have stock markets, investments of any kind, they put a few dollars between their matresses and that's it...

      --
      I read /.! I like seeing how misinformed, short sighted, and downright stupid some people are.
    11. Re:Please give the man some credit by tdubya · · Score: 1

      Since you obviously have no clue what you are talking about, and looking for any reason to bash Microsoft and Bill Gates, let me educate you a bit In June of 1999, Bill Gates made a CASH donation of a little over 5 billion dollars... They donated about 125 million to help children with aids... I don't think that was Windows Licenses... Those are just two examples of many... I know you won't respond now that you look like a complete moron, but maybe you should know what the f you are talking about

      --
      I read /.! I like seeing how misinformed, short sighted, and downright stupid some people are.
    12. Re:Please give the man some credit by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Alot of his money comes from investing activities, etc... If that's questionable business practice, you might move to a third world country where they don't have stock markets

      I've often wondered how stock market magically creates money ouf of nothing. I'm sure it has something to do with the third world countries after all.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    13. Re:Please give the man some credit by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      How does Microsoft take from local school budgets?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    14. Re:Please give the man some credit by danro · · Score: 1
      How does Microsoft take from local school budgets?
      Ehhh... are you serious?
      Do you know what Windows and Office licenses cost?
      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    15. Re:Please give the man some credit by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      I am serious.

      I hadnt considered the money paid for Windows or Office licenses as "taken" ( I was assuming the word was meant in an 'against their will' sort of way. ).

      But do lets be clear.... I am not a Microsoft fan, by any stretch.

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    16. Re:Please give the man some credit by danro · · Score: 1

      Oh, ok.
      I thought you were joking.

      I'm not really a anti-MS zealot, but unless Microsoft donates a lot to schools (with no strings attached) it is just the equivalent of a small discount on their software.
      In the end, they still get money from the school, not the other way around.

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    17. Re:Please give the man some credit by Duhavid · · Score: 1
      I thought you were joking.


      My whole family makes that mistake.

      NP, and thanks for the calm answer.
      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  16. People will never learn by crispybit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why cant people just accept the fact that MS does these things for a logical business oriented reason. If you people have such a problem with their software why dont you get off your asses and go do something about it. Well this guys a hipocrit you say? Nay, Im moving to Washington next week to finish up my schooling at UW cause I know MS hires directly out of the UW Seattle CS Department

    --
    To think is to engineer, to engineer is to become God
    1. Re:People will never learn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good luck. I hear Microsoft prefer's candidates who can use apostrophes'. You should start us'ing more apostrophes'. Us'ing apostrophes' i's a sign of highly qualif'ied candidates', which help's you in many job market's.

    2. Re:People will never learn by MECC · · Score: 1


      "logical business oriented reason"

      If any four words could form an oxymoron, it'd be those four words

      --
      "We are all geniuses when we dream"
      - E.M. Cioran
    3. Re:People will never learn by donutello · · Score: 1

      Nay, Im moving to Washington next week to finish up my schooling at UW cause I know MS hires directly out of the UW Seattle CS Department

      Please don't tell me that's the only reason you're moving there. Candidates at MS have to meet a certain bar. If you meet that bar, you'll get an offer regardless of where you graduated from. If you don't, you won't. Graduating from the UW CS department will not give you an automatic offer.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    4. Re:People will never learn by Aldric · · Score: 1

      We are doing something about it. For example, I'm heavily involved in moving my business's mission-critical systems from Windows to Linux. Once the server migration is complete the desktops will follow. Microsoft directly loses sales of Windows, Exchange, SQL Server due to my job. I'd mention Office but we never upgraded past Office 2000 - it's likely to hang around the longest running with Crossover Office, until OpenOffice or another FOSS office suite handles compatibility perfectly.

  17. ...and selling on as many markets by lastberserker · · Score: 1

    Missed one: Microsoft sells software and hardware in, what, maybe a hundred countries now? China is a big market, and it's Asian, not Western country - sure they know better there how to make, adapt and sell software in Asian markets.

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
    1. Re:...and selling on as many markets by dauthur · · Score: 1

      Touché. Yet another thing is that the Japanese market is right next door. Or landmass, anyway. The amount of money to be made from the Japanese technology market, and I'm sure Microsoft has tapped into it already (Sure? No. I know). The Japanese have perfected everything, really... I'm shamed to be American in a predominantly Japanese neighbourhood on Cape Cod. You should see the STUFF they have. As for Microsoft, it can only go either down or across for them right now.

    2. Re:...and selling on as many markets by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      The Japanese have perfected everything, really...

      You should see the STUFF they have.

      Just curious, but do you have any particular examples in mind? I know that there are tons of gadgets that come out in the Japanese consumer market first that rarely get introduced to other markets, but in terms of marketing software, what do they have that is different?

  18. Makes sense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Microsoft can't keep buying the U.S. government off forever; eventually, someone is going to assume the U.S. presidency who will actually allow the department of justice to enforce antitrust law and hold it for long enough for a case against Microsoft to be litigated.

    It would be good if before that happens, Microsoft could hedge their bets with a nation that can truly understand and respect them. China understands that capitalism should be used as a tool of oppression, not a tool to fight it, so they're the perfect escape from any other nation who might sit up once in awhile, remember that monopolies hurt markets, and try to meddle in the internal affairs of a company just because they're committing injustice or breaking the law or something. Rupert Murdoch is big on China for the exact same reason.

    1. Re:Makes sense. by kcbrown · · Score: 1
      Microsoft can't keep buying the U.S. government off forever; eventually, someone is going to assume the U.S. presidency who will actually allow the department of justice to enforce antitrust law and hold it for long enough for a case against Microsoft to be litigated.

      Spoken like someone who doesn't have a clue how the election system in the U.S. really works.

      Here's the clue: the electoral system is controlled by those who control the mass media, because those who control the mass media are essentially in direct control of what the people see and thus learn about. You won't vote for someone you've never heard of, so until your primary source of information is something other than the mass media, the mass media will control how you vote. This is why the mass media is so keen to control the internet.

      The mass media is owned by a small number of very large corporations. You're a fool if you think they don't do deals under the table with other corporations to determine which candidates get what kind of media exposure. Between that and "direct" campaign "contributions" (plus additional under-the-table deals), corporations have almost complete control over who makes it into office and what they do once they're there.

      Microsoft is one of the biggest, richest, most powerful corporations in the U.S. Other corporations may have more capital but Microsoft is close to (if not at) the top when it comes to pure profit, and thus money and power available to buy legislators and legislation, whether directly or from the media corporations.

      The end result of all this is that there will be no antitrust proceedings from now on that will have any real effect on Microsoft, unless the media corporations decide that it is in their best interests to damage Microsoft somehow. That won't happen. You see, the corporations that own the media are multinational corporations just like Microsoft is. That means they don't have to care about the U.S. economy any more than Microsoft does, at least as long as they retain the kind of power over the U.S. government they currently have.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    2. Re:Makes sense. by jawahar · · Score: 1


      Mod parent up.

      Government's role is not to "build" another "Microsoft".
      Government's role is to "create" an environment to build another "Microsoft".

  19. This Lawsuit will be the Gift that Keeps on GIving by putko · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So this is the 2nd or 3rd time this lawsuit has produced interesting titbits about M$. This thing is going to be the gift that keeps on giving. Get the popcord and sit back and watch.

    I somehow suspect that M$ will continue coming off as anti-human, anti-worker and just plain nasty.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  20. M$ is a popular target for a lawsuit by Maxhrk · · Score: 0

    interesting years that i have seen... Microsoft attracts alot of lawsuit flies.

  21. Perspective? by serutan · · Score: 0, Troll

    How's this for perspective? What kind of company do you think Microsoft would be today if Gates and Ballmer had been born and educated in India or China? What kind of computer geek hiring pool would they have had available to build the company up during their boom years? Do they owe the U.S. anything more than corporate taxes? I say yes, they do. They owe their very existence to the place and culture they grew up in. Instead of copping out with the Everybody-Does-It argument they should be using their business and innovation skills to find ways to keep as many jobs in America as possible, instead of selling them to the lowest bidder.

    1. Re:Perspective? by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do they owe the U.S. anything more than corporate taxes?

      They don't have any obligations beyond complying with the contracts they enter into, the laws in the countries where they operate, and their fiduciary responsibilty to their shareholders.

      I say yes, they do.

      Guess again, sport. Wishing doesn't make it so.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Perspective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have any obligations beyond complying with the contracts they enter into, the laws in the countries where they operate, and their fiduciary responsibilty to their shareholders.

      It would be nice if they'd meet the first two obligations. I'm sure long term shareholders have no complaints, but Microsoft are convicted monopolists with a history of stealing from their corporate "partners".

    3. Re:Perspective? by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      This kind of protectionism keeps prices artificially high and shafts poorer countries.

      It also weakens your own economy, but that's another story.

    4. Re:Perspective? by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      This kind of protectionism keeps prices artificially high and shafts poorer countries.

      Microsoft has 80% profit margins on software. Do you really believe that sending jobs offshore is going to lead to reduced prices? Dream on. They could reduce prices right now and still be wildly profitable.

    5. Re:Perspective? by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      Only if you're an insane capitalist that thinks they can ride the people to success and then drive them into the ocean when they *THINK* they don't need them anymore. We're about to see what mistreating your homeland does to you when states in the US start flipping Microsoft the finger and mandating open standards (eg not MS). The same will happen to other companies when they find out they can't get their way anymore because there aren't anymore jobs to threaten to "take away".

    6. Re:Perspective? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When a poster upthread wrote "...the only obligation MS has ..." you want to look carefully at the phrase "the only obligation."

      The poster was talking about Microsoft's legal obligations as a corporate entity. I believe his statements wrt a corporation's legal obligations is correct.

      You, when you talk about "Only if you're an insane capitalist [...]" are talking about the moral obligations of individuals. Your claim is arguable (not all people agree on what our moral obligations as individuals are), but it certainly captures how a great many people feel (incl. me).
      Microsoft uses its economic might in ways that are (perhaps legal, perhaps not, but) morally evil.

      Here's the problem: corporations are persons in some legal senses, but they certainly are /not/ persons in a general moral sense.

      A corporation is an economic machine that is designed to shield people from accountability. Shielding people from accountability creates all kinds of moral inversions, but no one has worked out yet how to change a corporation's status in a way that satisfies both our moral sense of how things should work, and our economic needs.

      (IMHO.) ---to KarmaMB84, I really do think MS is evil, and worst of all, a faceless evil that people at present can't see how to live without.

    7. Re:Perspective? by Sriracha · · Score: 1

      Do they owe the U.S. anything more than corporate taxes?

      Get real. Microsoft doesn't pay taxes. One of the most profitable companies in the world, and they don't pay taxes. They use transfer pricing from other countries to get out of it. Off-shore labor and subisidaries is how they arrange it.

      They develop products or print CDs in places like China, shipping it to the US through a subsidiary in a country that doesn't have taxes. The US division "buys" it at an intra-company price that is nearly the same as their wholesale price. The US division then resells it at 0 profit.

      Don't believe me? Read the Annual Reports for the past few years. That's why there's a nominal number (like 0) listed in the tax paid line.

      And you wonder why the US has budget and trade deficits? Our tax system incentivizes companies to ship off jobs.

  22. What Will Gandhi Say? by Slashdot_Gandhi · · Score: 0



    The weak can never forgive. Forgiveness is the attribute of the strong.

    Mahatma Gandhi

  23. Crocodile tears by adrenaline_junky · · Score: 3, Informative

    I may be the only fool here who had no idea what "crocodile tears" are, but according to http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-cro1.htm, "to weep crocodile tears is to pretend a sorrow that one doesn't in fact feel, to create a hypocritical show of emotion. The idea comes from the ancient belief that crocodiles weep while luring or devouring their prey."

    So now I know.

    1. Re:Crocodile tears by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not a "belief", some species of crocodiles weep when they devour their prey. The tears help lubricate the swallowing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Crocodile tears by Cougem · · Score: 1

      What a stupid way for an animal that lives in a river (isn't their enough lubrication around 99% of the time anyway?) to lubricate their pray.

      Why not use salivary ducts inside the mouth, rather than make your vision blurred? Also, with an animal as long-snouted as a crocodile, I doubt the tars would get THAT far into the mouth anyway.

      More likely I expect it to be a spin off of some histamine-like hormone causing many similar glands, including tear and salivary glands, to respond.

    3. Re:Crocodile tears by tulsileaf · · Score: 1

      The tears help lubricate the swallowing.

      --
      - tlf
    4. Re:Crocodile tears by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      What a stupid way... to lubricate their pray.

      I would expect a method of prayer to be more Intelligently Designed.

  24. They do Chinese work too by Danger+Stevens · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is attempting to develop their products to work better for Asian users.

    I can't imagine a better way to develop a product that they know will work well for the Chinese than to have it built in China.

    Frankly, I applaud this.

    --
    World Changing - News for Humans, Stuff about our planet
  25. What a concept... by shmlco · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If a company wanted to penetrate a market of a billion or so people, it might be... work with me here... a halfway decent idea to hire a few locals here and there to help develop and localize your products for that market. Not to mention the sales, marketing, legal, administrative, and other types one might need to service said market.

    This is news?

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    1. Re:What a concept... by Arandir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it's not news. What is news is this snippet from the blurbette: "it seems that the Chinese are not pleased with the number of jobs being moved to China...

      WTF! Who the hell cares about how pleased they are? You do want native people in China, but you don't *move* jobs there, you create jobs there! Expanding into a market doesn't mean you fire people in your old markets. Sheesh!

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:What a concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If a company wanted to penetrate a market of a billion or so people, it might be... work with me here... a halfway decent idea to hire a few locals here and there to help develop and localize your products for that market.

      In that case they should *create* jobs, not *move* them.

      Unless you beleive they plan loosing marketshare in the US... (hint: they don't)

    3. Re:What a concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's news to this bunch of paranoid crackpots. Honestly, this site has lost any credibility it ever had. The never ending anti-MS bullshit is pathetic, the conspiricy theorists, the Sony boycotters, the "I'm never buying a DVD ever" crowd and the "I bought it I can do what I like with it" crew, fucking hell, its like a playground of fucking idiots.

      Somebody please point me in the direction of a site that embraces technology and really is news for nerds. I'm so tired of Slashdot, its starting to spoil my day reading it but I do enjoy geek news.

      As to your point, yes, normal people understand that global companies really do hire globally. Microsoft has staff here in the UK! Shock. China is emerging as the biggest market on the planet, yet MS hire some staff there and Bill G & Co are suddenly planning to haul operations to China. It's pathetic the responses you read, its not even worhy of comment because so many people here are actually fucking dumb.

      The same with DRM and Sony et al. Everything is going digital, piracy is rampant, yet these companies are EVIL and must be avoided at all cost because they try to protect the multi-million investment in media productions. Okay, they don't always get it right but *something* needs to be done. There are laws, it shouldn't be a free-for-all. You pay for your entertainment and everything is fine, DRM is transparent if you don't break the law and nobody forces you to buy this DVD or go watch a particular movie.

      I know it's a waste of time trying to talk sense on here anymore. There's no real geek news here, no talk of algorithms and software, hardly any new technology coverage, Roland has a far more interesting take on technology trends yet even he is blasted for posting interesting links to his "cash cow" blog. The amount of dupes etc just proves that nobody really gives a fuck about this site anymore either, its just a nice little earner that attracts needs because of its history. If this site were to launch now it would disappear within weeks.

      What a shame.

      Sad, pathetic. Goodbye Slashdot.

    4. Re:What a concept... by shmlco · · Score: 1

      That would be true... if it were true. But if one were to RTFA: "We are growing our work force there and will continue to do so; however, that growth has not and will not replace jobs here in Redmond..."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    5. Re:What a concept... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      a halfway decent idea to hire a few locals here and there to help develop and localize your products for that market.

      China is Pirate Heaven. If small businesses are forced to start paying for Windows and Office, they will probably switch to OSS or pirate an MS competitor that does not crack down as hard. They are just not used to paying for software there (beyond the price of the CD print). Thus, I don't think China can be a very big market for MS.

      Further, the Chinese gov is not happy about MS, a US company, controlling the operating system. They still remember the incident of 30 bugs (microphones) being planted in a custom 747 they ordered for gov use.

    6. Re:What a concept... by shmlco · · Score: 1
      "They still remember the incident of 30 bugs (microphones) being planted in a custom 747 ..."

      What are you talking about? We planted 32 of 'em on that plane, and... ah... shit!

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  26. Hang on by el_womble · · Score: 0, Troll

    So Windows XP was put together by the best brains that money could buy and it was OK - not great, not good, just OK. >90% of the worlds computers, for better or worse, run on this operating system, and its averageness has lead to a world where people still think that viruses, malware and spyware are an accepted part of computing and that its the 90% marketshare making it a target that has caused these problem.

    Now its going to be designed by the best people money can buy, Microfied (viruses and bugs added - to improve the upgrade market) by the marketing dept, and then built by the cheapest labour on the planet. And this will improve stability and performance how? What about all those studies that show that its not the volume of coders that you need, its the quality?

    Now I'm sure, given the right support, these Chinese coders have the potential to take over the world, but the fact is they'll get Mubai'd. Badly translated design sheets will arrive on their desks. They're managers will only be interested in the volume of code they produce (because thats an easier metric than quality), and the working environment will be sweat shop not think tank, and probably worse of all, if they find an inconsistancy in the design, they'll code through it as it will be cheaper than waiting for the world to rotate so that Redmond is awake enough to answer questions coherantly.

    To all the banks, governments, militaries et al. The end is nigh. Start investing now in Linux or BSD. They're charities, so its tax deductable. If you want more control you can buy that too. What you want to invest in is the GUI and Office Suite. this is because good coders often find this bit boring, and need 'motivation' to want to do it in their spare time. The rest is pretty much there - at least its already better than a lot of windows. Just remember that you won't 'own' anything, but then you don't own Windows / Office either. I'm sure if you speak nicely to Linus he'll provide you with a "We support free software", or "Free software inside" banner for your websites, brochures and websites.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
    1. Re:Hang on by jcr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So Windows XP was put together by the best brains that money could buy

      Well, this is true in a sense, but money can't buy the best brains.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Hang on by Belsical · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a developer at Microsoft and I've worked with devs located in India, China, and the UK. You couldn't be more incorrect about, well, anything you said. I just visited the Beijing offices and they were just like ours in the Redmond. These are not contractors. They are full time employees delivering important components of large products. Their interview process is the same, they're paid the same wages (adjusted to cost of living for that region), and given the same benefits. Their review process is the same - based on quality, not quantity of code.

      Devs from India come to Redmond to meet with developers here and they're welcomed with open arms. They're treated the same as other devs. They come out to lunch with us, attend morale events, company functions, etc.

      We're an international company...and we hire internationally. Get over it. We're going to hire smart people all over the world. We always have, it's just that now there are options other than having them move half-way around the world.

      --

      "There are no such things as mutual fantasies. Yours bore us and ours offend you."
      - Bill Maher
    3. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha burn!

    4. Re:Hang on by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 1
      attend morale events,

      *Loses will to live**

    5. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that would be because...

    6. Re:Hang on by casehardened · · Score: 1

      The critical line in your post is: "...they're paid the same wages (adjusted to the cost of living..." The cost of living in China and India is a hell of a lot less than here or the UK. This creates downward price pressure on engineers here. Thus the distaste.

    7. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An angel appears at a faculty meeting and tells the dean that in return for his unselfish and exemplary behavior, the Lord will reward him with his choice of infinite wealth, wisdom, or beauty.

      Without hesitating, the dean selects infinite wisdom.

      "Done!" says the angel, and disappears in a cloud of smoke and a bolt of lightning.

      Now, all heads turn toward the dean, who sits surrounded by a faint halo of light.

      One of his colleagues whispers, "Say something."

      The dean sighs and says, "I should have taken the money."

    8. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal-Mart actually forces their employees to do a pep-rally style cheer.

    9. Re:Hang on by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    10. Re:Hang on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're going to hire smart people all over the world.

      That should be an improvement over the folks you've got working for you now.

    11. Re:Hang on by mpaque · · Score: 2, Informative

      they're paid the same wages (adjusted to cost of living for that region)

      Nice out, that. I'm sure the MSFT hiring managers would be happy to hire folks with a Masters in CS and 5-10 years experience within the US if they could only get them to work for 21,200 USD/year. (Starting salary in China for a BS in CS was 13,300 USD/year from the 2003 EE Survey.)

    12. Re:Hang on by everphilski · · Score: 1

      ...they're paid the same wages (adjusted to the cost of living...

      That doesn't change YOUR cost of living. That just makes them financially more attractive because they don't need fancy cars or fancy houses. (And that happens to be why I like where I live in the states, very reasonable cost of living so even if I only make a modest paycheck compared to my counterparts in California or Virginia, I'm putting way more into my 401k than they and I manage to pay off my house sooner...)

      -everphilski-

    13. Re:Hang on by dspisak · · Score: 1

      MS hires smart people, sure, but how come you managed to misspell Bill Maher's name in your signatures quote?

    14. Re:Hang on by Pijalu · · Score: 1

      ...I just visited the Beijing offices and they were just like ours in the Redmond...

      Jail for anyone speaking about freedom or human rights ? http://web.amnesty.org/report2004/chn-summary-eng/ ...

  27. Re:GoogleDot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  28. It's all logical. by nich0las · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are the Borg(hence your goal is to assimilate) you would make the same move as well. Why bother with a couple hundred million peons in America when you can consume billions in an Asian country? Statisticly and logically it's the smart move. It's all exponential. This little uprise from the Chinese is just their last struggle. They too will be assimilated. Rest easy little lambs, we will all soon become Borg.

  29. Re:This Lawsuit will be the Gift that Keeps on GIv by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Get the popcord and sit back and watch.

    I'll just assume using a "pop cord" when enjoying a show is some kind of geek activity and move on... :-S

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  30. Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hello Gentlemen,

    I'm a first year programming student at an Ivy League school and I've
    just finished my Visual Basic classes. This term I'll be moving onto
    C++. However I've noticed some issues with C++ that I'd like to
    discuss with the rest of the programming community. Please do not
    think of me as being technically ignorant. In addition to VB, I am
    very skilled at HTML programming, one of the most challenging
    languages out there!

    C++ is based on a concept known as Object Oriented Programming. In
    this style of programming (also known as OOPS in the coding community)
    a programmer builds "objects" or "glasses" out of his code, and then
    manipulates these "glasses". Since I'm assuming that you, dear reader,
    are as skilled at programming as I am, I'll skip further explanation
    of these "glasses".

    Please allow me to make a brief aside here and discuss the origins C++
    for a moment. My research shows that this language is one of the
    oldest languages in existence, pre-dating even assembly! It was
    created in the early 70s when AT&T began looking for a new language to
    write BSD, its Unix Operation System (later on, other companies would
    "borrow" the BSD source code to build both Solaris and Linux!)
    Interestingly, the name C++ is a pun by the creator of the language.
    When the first beta was released, it was remarked that the language
    would be graded as a C+, because of how hideously complex and unwieldy
    it was. The extra plus was tacked on during a later release when some
    of these issues were fixed. The language would still be graded a C,
    but it was the highest C possible! Truly a clever name for this
    language.

    Back to the topic on hand, I feel that C++ - despite its flaws - has
    been a very valuable tool to the world of computers. Unfortunately
    it's starting to show its age, and I feel that it should be
    retired, as COBOL, ADA and Smalltalk seem to have been. Recently I've
    become acquainted with another language that's quite recently been
    developed. Its one that promises to greatly simplify programming. This
    new language is called C.

    Although syntactically borrowing a great deal from its predecessor
    C++, C greatly simplifies things (thus its name, which hints at its
    simpler nature by striping off the clunky double-pluses.) Its biggest
    strength is that it abandons an OOPS-style of programming. No more
    awkward "objects" or "glasses". Instead C uses what are called
    structs. Vaguely similar to a C++ "glass", a struct does away with
    anachronisms like inheritance, namespaces and the whole
    private/public/protected/friend access issues of its variables and
    routines. By freeing the programmer from the requirement to juggle all
    these issues, the coder can focus on implementing his algorithm and
    rapidly developing his application.

    While C lacks the speed and robustness of C++, I think these are petty
    issues. Given the speed of modern computers, the relative sluggishness
    of C shouldn't be an issue. Robustness and stability will occur as C
    becomes more pervasive amongst the programming community and it
    becomes more fine-tuned. Eventually C should have stability rivaling
    that of C++.

    I'm hoping to see C adopted as the de facto standard of programming.
    Based on what I've learned of this language, the future seems very
    bright indeed for C! Eventually, many years from now, perhaps we'll
    even see an operating system coded in this language.

    Thank you for your time. Your feedback is greatly appreciated.

    1. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's the worst troll ever.....

      You suck ass, loser!

    2. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Mercedes308 · · Score: 1

      I don't know whats sadder, this troll or the fact that I read his entire post.

      --
      And no, I couldn't give a shit what my karma is.
    3. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Gentlemen,

      Look, cut all the crap about programming and tell me how I get my 20,000,000 USD transferred to my bank account.

    4. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually I'm waiting for A+... wouldn't that be the best language ever? ;)

      " While C lacks the speed..."

      Small nitpick... C should actually be faster...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    5. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by bladesjester · · Score: 1

      My hat is off to you. I needed the chuckle.

      Well done.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    6. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't his troll. That troll was originally from eggtroll back in 1999 or so. Look up eggtroll@yahoo.com on old usenet archives and you will see other gems like this.

    7. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by bladesjester · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a troll. It's satire, really.

      That sort of thing seems to be lost on a lot of the people who responded to it.

      --
      Everything I need to know I learned by killing smart people and eating their brains.
    8. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that your only "nitpick" with his post?

    9. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I thought he was asking for a job. You know, after proving all of modern physics^H^H^H^H^H^H^H computer science wrong on the basis of unpublishable theories?

    10. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this as satire. I'm only ashamed of myself that I was merely shocked, and not incredulous, when thinking a first year CS student would never think HTML was a challenging language would s/he?

      Anyway, what's this about Smalltalk being dead? I must have missed that meeting.

    11. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by ScrappyLaptop · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Plagerized satire about poorly educated IT workers...now that's ironic!

      http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.c++/brows e_thread/thread/4d7d5feddc66f7a/e88f4c2a88cddc0c?q =%22time+to+retire+C%2B%2B%22&

      Funny thing is how few people, then or now, recognize that the author is intentionally crafting the misinformation and new-CS-student attitude. Thanks to the person in this present-day thread for pointing me to Egg Troll's writings! Can anonymous coward have an ego?

    12. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      It was a joke man... it's not fashionable to nitpicks jokes... but I thought the mistake deserves mention...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    13. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummmmm.

    14. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a "mistake" any more than "glasses" is a mistake. He was clearly aware that C++ is actually slower and just wanted to poke fun at it.

    15. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by damiam · · Score: 1

      You, sir, have been trolled.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    16. Re:Time to Retire C + +?' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK. This reminds me of Kung Pow and of course Deadly Face To Fist Style :) Who is your guru?

  31. If you pay people, they will come by zymano · · Score: 1

    If you start offshoring then people see the writing on the wall. H2B visas for immigrants by companies is just to drive down wages. Nothing else. Just a smoke screen about not having the skills.

  32. Let's be fair !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All big IT firms are doing the same thing. IBM has recently said that IT in this country is on the decline and they need more U.S. people in this field. Well, I guess that is the excuse that they are expanding their operations in India and China. On the other hand, they are lashing out 28000 jobs everywhere else. Go figure.

  33. They have risen! Beware! by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Through his foundation bill has been funding us schools.

    The schools have attained self-awareness!

    Our only chance is to strike them down while they are occupied futility arguing on Slashdot and are not creating weapons of ultimate doom out of cafeteria food.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  34. Um, Stallman is an American by tjstork · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Linux could not exist without the Gnu compiler.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by Urkki · · Score: 1
      • Linux could not exist without the Gnu compiler.

      Would not, perhaps yes. But of course it *could* exist, it's not like gcc is the only C compiler there is for Linux to have been developed with originally.

      It's as much the other way around, GNU would be a fringe phenomenon without the success of Linux... Somehow I don't see Stallman successfully leading an international free operating system development, way too much ego in that head (which isn't necessarily a bad thing, just a wrong thing for starting something like Linux).

      You can say that there wouldn't be Linux without all the GNU stuff that make up the OS outside kernel. But you could also say that if there were no GNU, Linux would use some other software with some other GNU-like license. But that's just "what if" speculation. We do have significant amounts of GPL software, and Linux is GPL software, and that works rather nicely, and it's good. Yet the most prominent Linux software packages often aren't GPL (like Apache), which is also good.
    2. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by Quino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's backwards. Given the GNU movement (the movement, the license, the goal of an OS) Linux was inevitable. It was a simple matter of (most likely, a very short) time.

      Without the GNU movement, nothing would have happened. Linux (the kernel) was an inevitable an obvious goal after that. Stallman simply does not get the credit he deserves, and Linus is given credit for a movement, license, ideology and an OS where credit for a kernel is due.

    3. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1
      Linux could not exist without the Gnu compiler.

      That is a phenomenally ignorant statement. There are other C compilers, even at the time Linux was first written.

    4. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      True, but if, for instance Borland C++ was required to compile Linux, an added cost for any and all development of the Linux kernel would be a licensed copy of Borland C++ on each developer's machine.

      No, there are NOT other C compilers that are adequate to compile Linux that are freely available, especially there were not when Linux was first written. The minix compiler is more free now than it was when Linus started coding Linux, but back then you had to buy a copy of Tannenburg to have a license to use it.

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I meant to type Tannenbaum, damnit.

      (you can get Minix for free here by the way.)

      --
      resigned
    6. Re:Um, Stallman is an American by tjstork · · Score: 1

      What other compiler was as ubiquitious and as free as GNU?

      Do you think Linux was going to write it using Visual Studio or Borland C++?

      Get real! :-)

      --
      This is my sig.
  35. Good job Bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Bill, looks like Americans don't understand what you say. Please continue to move the jobs to China.

      Chinese are the nost aggressive people. I come from mixed background but in school I observed that, half of the Chinese students completed their Research even before they met their Prof every week and rest assured their neighbors, Indians were up on their feet to compete with them.....

    Cheers!

  36. noodles xp by b1gn4tb00bs · · Score: 0

    noodles 2000 is in the extended support phase at the moment, so pleas take this opertunity to upgrade to noodles xp

    --
    pr0n: now ive got your attention click here
  37. It's on Groklaw now by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

    A fairly in-depth look here

    --
    C|N>K
  38. Bill's BS in BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get Bill. He laments over the lack of CS graduates, but forgets that he himself never graduated. Perhaps that's his way of ensuring the students who are bright enough to drop out don't repeat his same mistake.

  39. I feel like a kibbitzer... by kahei · · Score: 1


    Heh, looks like black forced white to use a move up killing those dead stones -- now black has sente for the all-important endgame AND white has lost his best ko threat. I think that move decided the game for black.

    Remember, folks, kibbitzing is the most important part of go!

    In other news, this story is just 'China kicks US ass', and that's a truism in go as well as industry.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  40. crocodile tears? by heatdeath · · Score: 1

    Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

    Well, what would you do if you were sad that there weren't as many highly qualified CS graduates and research spending? I would start hiring people that ARE qualified. I think if you add the two ideas together, you don't get "Bill Gates is an evil man who says one thing and does another", although since this is slashdot, that's the default slant. You get "Bill Gates is sad that CS majors coming out of major US universities suck now, and he's realizing that asian people are smarter and work harder."

    --
    I'm sorry. The number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again.
    1. Re:crocodile tears? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Bill Gates also understands the currency exchange rate.

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:crocodile tears? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bill Gates is sad that CS majors coming out of major US universities suck now, and he's realizing that asian people are smarter and work harder."

      Apparently we also get stupid-ass stereotypes in all sorts of directions.

    3. Re:crocodile tears? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      You've got it backwards. What would you do if you wanted to invest in a new global market? Cooperate with Chinese demands to hire people there. What would you do if you wanted to hire engineers who are cheaper and more likely to do what they're told? Hire in China and keep the wage pressure on your US engineers. What would you do to avoid negative publicity about blatant off-shorinig? Complain about a lack of US engineers, when the engineers are requiring from the excesses of the dotbombs and starting to demand decent salaries again.

      Also, you've missed a critical difference. American workers are more likely to talk back to their managers when they see something stupid or criminal going on. Underpaind Chinese workers getting paid in American dollars, whether on H1B's that can be revoked by being fired or getting paid real American dollars in China are much less likely to talk back.

      This is good for management, but bad for software development. Your manager cannot always be expected to know the right technical solutions, he's usually older, goes to too many meetings, and doesn't get a chance to play with the tools and see where they break. I've seen too many imported engineers produce complete crap because they're following the specs of a manager who didn't realize where it would fail, where I had to go in and clean up the mess. And they just went ahead and did it, without saying "I can't do this" or "this won't work" when it was completely obvious even to them it would fail.

  41. Test is getting outsourced to China by melted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not all of it, either. Mostly manual test, requiring little to no skill. For this kind of test, it sure would be a waste to pay someone in Redmond $60-70K/yr. Automated test, infrastructure, security, perf/stres, and all other critical test remains in Redmond so far.

    What was said above was only about China, though. Indian insiders seem to push real hard to get not only testing, but also development and program management to India. However, since they aren't (yet) an overwhelmin majority here, only low-impact work items go to India, so that if folks in India fuck it up (and they often do), we could fix the situation without slipping the schedule much. Overall, I'd say "split" development leads to worse code quality, but it's still a lot better than if all of it was developed in India.

    1. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by rnjn,sinha · · Score: 1

      Slashdot:news for crybabies: stuff that is FUD. Grow up man. I can't see one comment on outsourcing that does not say that work was "F*@& up". Yeah probably. Don't open an account with ABN Amro. After all they have signed such a big deal and I for sure know that IBM would be getting its work done either in China or India.

    2. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      I can't see one comment on outsourcing that does not say that work was "F*@& up".

      I'm an IT consultant; I've worked for some pretty big firms. Not a single projects I've had that's dealt with outsourcing in India and/or China didn't have massive, horrible problems with being "F*@& up". Poor quality, people who wouldn't do jack shit without a work order in triplicate, semi-literate (no, not just the language barrier) "support" people, industrial espionage of the lowest, most horrible base, lacking basic security safeguards, rotten or nonexistent QA and long-term massive cost overruns disguised by "hey, we delivered _something_, so you're still saving money" are only parts of the picture. Also, a far-higher proportion than what I'm used to of people brought in from abroad to help with outsourcing have turned out to utterly useless, which is crap for the few good ones as they're lumped into the massive monkey-pot. To be fair, I've seen some excellent backoffice-type work done by various smaller Indian outfits, but that's about the sum of it.
      I for sure know that IBM would be getting its work done either in China or India.

      I've actually just had to deal first-hand with the result of this, and boy, let me tell you, no more IBM for me.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    3. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can't see one comment on outsourcing that does not say that work was "F*@& up"."

      You're new here aren't you?

    4. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah and every project done onshore came with a boat load of quality and success - naturally the project was blessed. BS.

      You a$$holes don't understand that if your project failed it was partly because of you too. Didn't your f$$king quality loving country teach you that project is team work. May be it failed because you wanted to prove a point or you are the incompetent. It's not as if you are showing us a certificate of your competence.

      I have worked on 2 dozen projects in my lifetime and if there are *2* good people on the project one manager and one architect the project has generally succeeded even though it was offshored. AND yes, I have seen plenty of 100% onshore projects without a single Indian in them which failed miserably. The only difference is that customer paid 100 or 1000 times more for the failure and the onshore company marketed the failure good enough to save their asses and there was no-one to complain about it here on slashdot.

      Get over it buddy - don't fool people around.

    5. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly manual test, requiring little to no skill.

      You're claiming that Microsoft tests it's software? BS.

    6. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Nice anonymous troll. _My_ projects have always been successful, yes. I choose my projects wisely. None of them ever relied on offshore people for anything, mainly because I can judge quality better when I meet the people involved face to face. I don't bother with doomed-to-failure domestic projects either.

      Not a single project I've ever had the misfortune to encounter or to rely upon in the course of getting my shit done, and which relied on offshoring to a cheap-as-shit Indian or Chinese company managed anything near a success.

      Way to imply that I said "Indians are incompetent", why don't you read my post again. When you lowball on price alone, you usually get what you deserve, and I don't recall seeing anyone (although maybe it's happened, who knows) choose Infosys purely on quality of work.

      Maybe you need to get over it; I suppose next thing you'll tell me that ~8 years of observational evidence is wrong.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    7. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Except they opened a **Research Center** a few years ago. Mining the best and brightest from China. Don't think for a second that you're not next. Hope their governement protects its citizen better than yours. That could give you a few years to think of something to do while the chinese do it all by themselves.

      Oh, they're (MS) doing the same thing in India also, big shiny research center being opened. With the best and brightest.

      You know I like to pretend to myself that Research is kinda the top of the "food chain" in term of good jobs. I let you imagine where the *rest* of the food chain might be heading. And if you think this is a natural phenomenon where an equilibrium is slowly being reach around the world, please tell me what kind of an equilibrium you expect 'cause I sure don't think we will weight too much in the balance in the end. It's just that we have the startup money they need right now. You know how Angels and VC want to control the board of your startup? In the back of your mind you always sorta plot to take control back and keep your baby... Think bigger now, nation big. I always wanted to be a plumber anyway :)

    8. Re:Test is getting outsourced to China by melted · · Score: 1

      No, it's not because of me. I make every effort to help these poor folks in India isofar as this help does not affect my own schedule and performance. They _demand_ help. They're not like your typical FTE who would just come to the team, sit in his office for two weeks, swearing like a truck driver and start producing solid code. These fellas require handholding at everything. Devs in the US are between a rock and a hard place. If you help - they grow dependent on you and want you to do work for them (which ultimately leads to either overtime or schedule impact), if you don't - you get a lower review score because of your "teamwork skills".

      There's another problem as well - program management. You see, program managers are a stupid bunch. They like to formulate their requirements fully only towards the end of the product cycle. Their communication skills often leave much to be desired, too. Guess what, this DOES NOT WORK if you outsource dev work. No issue can be resolved in less than 24 hours because of time difference. Even if you do resolve it over email, there's no guarantee Indian folks "got your point". If your dev is next door, you just walk into his office and draw shit on the whiteboard. If your dev is in India, you're massively out of luck.

      I could bring up a dozen more issues explaining why outsourcing _development_ is a good idea, and outsourcing _pm_ is even worse. But I think that would be wasted effort. You're probably in Hyderabad or Bangalore right now, sipping chai and thinking that Americans are lazy and stupid, and your IIT diploma is better than the one from Stanford. :-)

  42. The West is just going to get used to this. by Stalyn · · Score: 0

    I know this article was most likely posted for anti-MS and anti-offshore hits. Because honestly thats all slashdot is good for nowadays, pissing people off and increasing their page impressions.

    Anyway, the people in Asia are just as smart as us and just as educated. Not only that they work harder and for less money. Corporations have no nationalistic goals. As long as the governments in which they base do not hamper their profits they don't care. If the government does somehow infringe on them they either get out of town or make an investment in a new government.

    The fact remains in order to compete with Asia we are going to have to work harder, invest more in education and sorry to say this... work for less. It is either that or unionize. Which will never happen.

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    1. Re:The West is just going to get used to this. by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      I hope you enjoy your new Chinese overlords in 10 years.

    2. Re:The West is just going to get used to this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The fact remains in order to compete with Asia we are going to have to work harder, invest more in education and sorry to say this... work for less.
      If I only had expenses (food, rent, gas etc.) that were as low as in China I could afford to work for a Chinese salary...
  43. China has its own agenda by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    In other news, you can often read that China allowed some foreign investment only if the investor makes significant concessions in form of technology transfer. Frequently, this takes the form of requiring a partnership with a chinese company. This way, the chinese make sure they get their part of the profits and get their hands on the know-how.

    If Microsoft think they have a cushy retreat in China, they are in for a nasty surprise. As much as I dislike the way Chinese government tramples human rights, their ways of keeping greedy corporations in their place deserves some respect.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
    1. Re:China has its own agenda by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      As much as I dislike the way Chinese government tramples human rights, their ways of keeping greedy corporations in their place deserves some respect.

      That's because Chinese leaders see how corporations in America have gained control of the government. In a Communist/psudo-fascist government that's NEVER going to be allowed. It's pretty much common knowledge that China is not interested in US copyright or IP, it'll be interesting to see how, going forward, MS gets screwed by this.

      Microsft vs. China: it's like a pitbull vs. a velociraptor.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:China has its own agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and the methods that they use for brutal suppression of their population and media censorship are laudable too.

      Corporations are not greedy.

      Repeat after me: Corporations are not greedy. Corporations are amoral legal constructs to insulate individuals from liability.

      People are greedy. Forcing private industry to divest itself of trade secrets to participate in China's economy is a human rights violation. Keeping a currency peg in place to make labor artifically cheap is a human rights violation.

      The only reason that large organizations move labor to cheap locations is that they have a fiduciary responsiblity to their shareholders and executives are motivated by their personal compensation.

      China's practices are abhorrent - and are going to be devastatingly effective in advancing them technologically.

    3. Re:China has its own agenda by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the methods that they use for brutal suppression of their population and media censorship are laudable too.
      Well, I said that I dislike that aspect of their policy.

      Corporations are not greedy. Corporations are amoral legal constructs to insulate individuals from liability.
      Which leads to greedy, immoral behaviour. Allowing such constructs to exist without better checks on their power is, at best, stupid.
      I'm not advocating the complete abolishment of corporations. But the insulation from liability goes too far. While outright falsifying the books is usually punished, when was the last time a manager was held responsible for "minor" misdeeds as illegal price fixing? Holding management personally liable for more kinds of illegal actions might improve things.

      Forcing private industry to divest itself of trade secrets to participate in China's economy is a human rights violation
      So you are sorry for the amoral legal constructs?
      Besides, I don't consider it a human right to sell stuff to China. China's business practices may be unfair and maybe even violate some trade agreements, but making a human rights issue of this is ridiculous.
      Problems in that area are best adressed by some counter-pressure in form of tolls on Chinese products, which the USA could certainly introduce.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    4. Re:China has its own agenda by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      that China allowed some foreign investment only if the investor makes significant concessions in form of technology transfer. Frequently, this takes the form of requiring a partnership with a chinese company. This way, the chinese make sure they get their part of the profits and get their hands on the know-how.

      Their secret plan is to own Microsoft Bob, and release it as Bob Fu.

    5. Re:China has its own agenda by jd_esguerra · · Score: 1
      As much as I dislike the way Chinese government tramples human rights, their ways of keeping greedy corporations in their place deserves some respect.

      Communism? Yeah, it's working for them so far.

  44. To add to the above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's about the kindest, gentlest form of outsourcing I've ever seen. People are encouraged to move up the test food chain by either improving their coding or people management skills. Those who fail to do so, are given a three month window during which they can find a job within Microsoft (there are thousands of open positions, a lot of them in Test). I wish other companies would go to such great lengths to make things as painless as possible for regular employees.

  45. they're sincere... by cahiha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think Microsoft has had a very bad influence on CS job prospects (note: MCSE is not a CS job). However, the fact that they are now having to go to China is a case of being hoisted by their own petard; after they destroyed most of the interesting R&D jobs, they don't have a choice but to go to China. So, I think Gates's lamentations are sincere; he probably doesn't even understand what he has done to CS research in this country.

    In any case, even without Microsoft's destructive influence, Chinese high-tech workers would still be competing with US high-tech workes. And the Chinese government is fully within its rights to demand that any company doing business with/in China move jobs there--the US government is doing the same thing.

    1. Re:they're sincere... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      ... bah try being a cryptographer who refuses to work on DRM [e.g. has priciples]. I've received several offers recently [Sandisk being one of them] that are DRM related.

      MSFT may destroy CS but the industry as a whole is destroying itself.

      Simple reason: There is no craft anymore. Nobody does anything that is just "cool". Well at least nobody in a position to market new things. Any real innovation you see that is ALSO beneficial to people will come in the form of OSS projects.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:they're sincere... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I think what you mean to say is 'the industry is maturing, and product categories are commodifying.'

      And the last part of what you say rephrased: 'the commodification is near complete enough now that the OSS cloners (who never produce product specs for anything, preferring just to clone previously successful products) are moving in.'

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:they're sincere... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      And the Chinese government is fully within its rights to demand that any company doing business with/in China move jobs there--the US government is doing the same thing.

      They are? Where?

      I don't think any single other country is as laxadaisical about globalization causing employment disruption as the US is.

      The US gov is all too willing to let other countries dump their cheap almost-slave-built shit here without asking for anything in return. That is why we have a gigantic trade deficit that is an ugly bubble waiting to burst.

    4. Re:they're sincere... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Nice potshot at the OSS community.

      I'll keep using GCC to build my source ... that builds on EVERY PLATFORM YOU CAN THINK OF. Yeah no standards...

      DRM is just another effort in gross futilism.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    5. Re:they're sincere... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      GCC is well known to be an 'embrace and extend' standard. GCC incorporates non-standard features. When you write code using them, your code won't build on other compilers. The GCC -pedantic compiler switch doesn't flag all these non-standard features in your code.

      Awhile back there was controversey because nobody deeply involved in the GCC project had involvement with the standards committee. Or was it 'non-controversey' because few GCC users cared?

      There are other compilers and tools, from other organizations, that also incorporate 'embrace and extend' features.

      --
      resigned
    6. Re:they're sincere... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Um, ok... first off -pedantic WILL warn you about non-standard issues. Try combining it with a standard flag e.g. "--std=c99 -pedantic".

      Second, who the fuck are you? I write code [easily] that builds with unix CC on Solaris, IRIX, HP-UX, BSD, MacOSX and Linux.

      Maybe your gripe with GCC is that you're a lousy coder and you blame the compiler for your shortcomings.

      I mean man, whine like a stuck pig you are. Sure GCC isn't perfect but stable releases seem to work fine for hundreds of thousands of people.

      So yes, it is *just you*.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  46. You have a reference for this? by adrenaline_junky · · Score: 1

    The above article mentions that the gland that lubricates the eyes on crocodiles is near their throat, so crocodiles can appear to be tearing while eating. But it says nothing about the tears providing lubrication for their swallowing.

    You have a reference for this? I can't google anything on it.

  47. Microsoft vrs the USA by brakken · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I was Bill Gates when the USA tried to take his wealth from him with that BS lawsuit I would of told them to screw off, fired everyone in the USA and moved my company to another country. Hopefully this happens and don't go blaming old Bill if it does. Why would you want to be in a Country trying to rape you for cash?

    --
    [ brakken ]
    1. Re:Microsoft vrs the USA by What+me+a+Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah like that isn't the pot calling the kettel black!

          Gate's and C.O. have raped and ripped off the american public not to mention eruope for so long it would have been about time to turnabout. To bad bush got into the oval office and let em get off scott free.

          Personally i say good riddance china deserves em and i personally belive that the US and eruope would dump or we can only hope outlaw all MS products as well as the heads of MS from the US and eruope in response leaving MS to whither and die in china with no possibility of returning to the west.

          Now that would be just payment for the decades of legalized rape and piliaging that MS was allowed to do on the public at large. That and making us put up with that piece of crap windows OS i mean really 66k plus bugs in xp alone and thats supposed to be state of the art?

          OK so im bitter but i put up with gate's crappy OS's for almost 2 decades and this is how he repays the public? And the lawsuit wasn't B.S. OK that cow in charge of the DOJ went about it all wrong trying to get them for being a monopoly instead of going after them for the real crime they commited namely orriginally theft or copyright infringment (which was why they had to sign the we won't put a competing product into our OS to begin with). I still say the DOJ should have shut down MS and sent gates and co. to jail in the first place instead of giving them that easy out like that. They do deserve to rot in prison for life not live the high life off the peoples hard earned cash. I guess letting them rot in china would be almost as good lol.

          And their are alternatives to windows though i still say linux needs work and nobody i mean nobody should give that evil jobs a chance to prove he's worse than gates could ever be. So what other choices are their? I guess we'll have to wait and see how things go.

          Personally if MS moves to china i'll never buy an MS product ever again i can tell you that for sure.

      --
      Coward? Coward! Thems fighten words!!
    2. Re:Microsoft vrs the USA by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Where in the DoJ antitrust trial did the government ask for money? Their goal was the breakup of Microsoft into various companies, because that would have forced some actual competition in the marketplace.

      Microsoft doesn't have to compete on quality. All they need to do is sit on their butts and be happy that most organizations are locked into using their software because so much third-party software runs only on Windows. The antitrust trial was necessary, and American consumers were hurt when the DoJ settled for a slap on the wrist.

      People like you, who worship at the altar of "the free market" and who think a critical attempt at curbing anticompetitive behavior was nothing more than "a country trying to rape you for cash", are doing untold harm to this country. If Bill Gates does close down Redmond and move his entire fiefdom overseas, it will be nothing but the logical extension of the loyalty he has already shown this country.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  48. Really, please people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for bagging Microsoft, but seriously, some people may actually consider this as an investment for Microsoft into another market demographic. They employ programmers all over the world. China is not an easy place to do business for Western Countries, if they were looking for cheap labour there are easier places to hire!

  49. But wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have made it my purpose in life to make sure your company doesn't get a frigging dime. I recruit others, give them free software or alternatives. Just about ANYTHING I'll do to deny you the cash your company needs to survive.

    Good luck in China, you won't be there long and your hated in most parts of the world and growing here in the US.

    I know all about how Windows was purposely left "loose" to allow the Feds and spooks to hack into any PC they see fit.

    You sold out to the devil and communism. Screw you.

  50. Fallacy of "non-core" projects.. by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
    In addition, it's very probable that most of those jobs are for non-critical, non-core projects. This frees up the local developers to work on more important projects.

    Did you realize what you just gave away ?. It's called racial elitisim, but now with a nationalistic fringe attitude. You start off by giving away the unwanted and least important jobs to the immigrants or just plain offshore them, and before you know it you have a huge population of educated unemployed and per-capita income just comes crashing down.

    Do you know how I know this ?. Look at my own state - Kerala. It has one of the highest literacy rates and unemployement rates - with most of the blue collar labour, food and money coming from outside states. The economy is in a mess, thanks to a government flip from Left to Right and back every 5 years. You try guessing why I'm not living there .. there are no Jobs.

    Will you immigrate ?.
    1. Re:Fallacy of "non-core" projects.. by bladernr · · Score: 1
      n addition, it's very probable that most of those jobs are for non-critical, non-core projects. This frees up the local developers to work on more important projects.

      Did you realize what you just gave away ? It's called racial elitisim, but now with a nationalistic fringe attitude.

      Sorry to tell you this, as you are from an "offshoring destination", but this is a standard sales pitch FROM the offshore companies. Look at any of the India majors: TCS, Wipro, INFY, Satyam, whatever. You will see in their standards sales presentations talks about "freeing up local staff by moving non-core projects to low-cost geographies." Are you accusing them of reverse-racial-elitism?

      In fact, the first time I did offshoring in the 1990's (put on flamesuit) it was specifically for that purpose. The sales person from the major offshore vendor told me that I should re-deploy my most skilled and experienced staff by letting the offshore company take over the routine, boring, or easy work. Made sense to me, and I did exactly that (no one lost their job, in other words, I just created more "capacity").

      The idea of moving local staff from non-core projects to strategic projects through offshoring was invented by the offshore majors; don't blame the locals for repeating what they said.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
  51. MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see why this was modded funny.

  52. Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Here is a theory:
    large scale outsourcers are guilty of treason. Indict 'em, try 'em, convict 'em, sentence 'em, and hang 'em. Publicly.

    Especially CEOs that outsource, and the politicians that aid and abet this treason.

    This is treason. And the enemy is the corporate-investor power bloc.

    And just leave the bodies hanging from the rope, to rot, just to remind people what this is all about.

    You gotta get Old Skool, my fellow Americans, or else, ya gonna go 3rd world.

    Just my ever humble opinion....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      How is outsourcing treason?

      I agree it should be illegal but not because it deprives you of a job but because it reinforces slave labour and the net result is often Engrish ridden crap products.

      But if I can pay someone fairly [but less than you] elseehere.... too bad. You're asking for too much salary.

      I mean when the average developer in California is asking upwards of 100K/yr to do what the average person ANYWHERE else would get 55-65K/yr no shit they'll go elsewhere.

      Unfortunately when they do outsource it isn't to better or equal standards of living, pay, workmanship. They do it so they can pay less and still end up with "something".

      Anyways, you sir are watching too much Lou Dobbs. That guy is about as in touch with reality as a rock star tripping on acid.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, your job was outsourced?

    3. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      >> How is outsourcing treason?

      Outsourcing is Treason when it finances a hostile power that uses the funds it gains to engage in espionage and cyberwar against us, while preparing to go to war against us.

    4. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      He realizes that pouring our money into foreign countries who don't give a fig about their own people and just want to build bigger and faster nukes with our money (super-sonic nukes, YAY!) is a threat to the West and the entire planet. Trying to defend Taiwan from China while allowing our corporations to pour money into China is the most retarded thing this country has ever done.

    5. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's not YOUR money, it's Microsoft's money. They can spend it where they like. Unless you're advocating some sort of Iron-Curtail style embargo on China, which would be a massive step backwards.

      If you're going to argue like that, then give up ALL, and I mean ALL, goods manufactured in China. There are probably hundreds of things made in China in the average American house.

      Would you like to pay a whole load extra for things made in America instead? Of course not, yet you criticise corporations for doing the same. That's called hypocricy.

    6. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort."

      Attitudes like yours is why this little passage was put into the Constitution of the United States. Now, it's still possible to be found guilty of treason against a state, but you didn't seem to specify.

    7. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Symbiot · · Score: 1
      Here is a theory:
      large scale outsourcers are guilty of treason. Indict 'em, try 'em, convict 'em, sentence 'em, and hang 'em. Publicly.

      Here's another theory:
      Accept lower pay so that American companies won't outsource.

      Or how about this theory:
      Open new businesses in developing nations where talented workers can be hired locally for lower wages than can be had in the first world.

      Here's the deal: the wages in developing nations like India and China are going to go up and the wages in developed nations, especially the United States are going to go down. It's not going to be pleasant for those of us who have gotten used to high wages, but if we are truly as deserving and innovative as we've been telling ourselves we are all these years then we'll adapt, otherwise I suppose we can fight it until it overwhelms us.

      The lesson from the tragedy in New Orleans is that fighting certain changes only makes them happen at a later time and in a more dramatic fashion. If we accept the inevitable then we can work with it and utimately profit from it. Developed nations can afford to import the best and brightest from developing nations, for instance. Sure those people will displace less talented and more highly paid native workers, but they will also make native companies more competitive in the global market. It's far better to give jobs to imported talent than it is to lose the opportunity to employ anyone at all. Developed nations also have more cash on hand to spend on education and on infrastructure, like public transportation, that will make it easier for their people to compete by being able to offer a higher degree of skill at a lower rate of pay.

      The way to win this game is to make outsourcing undesirable, not illegal. This is really the same argument that slashdotters make about the entertainment industry: new technology has changed the basic nature of the market, the thing to do is to bid farewell to easy profits and develop a leaner business model that fits the new environment, not enact laws that artificially protect the status quo.

      It will be interesting to see if technology geeks are really smarter than the entertainment industry or if we're really just all talk.

    8. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Cryofan · · Score: 1

      our "enemies" are the corporate-investors bloc, shitferbrains....

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    9. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by danro · · Score: 1

      And what power would that be, pray tell?
      If you say China you're on crack!

      Do you realize that by interconnecting your economies you make war a lot less likely.
      It won't be in their interest to go to war with you if it would trash their own economy the same second the first shot were fired!

      Sigh I don't know why I'm even answering a "OMG TREASON!"-screaming "patriot".

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    10. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      No, our "enemies" are who Congress declares war on, which hasn't happened since 1941. Even Ethel and Julius Rosenberg weren't tried for treason. You cannot arbitrarily declare someone as an "enemy" of the United States and there are very good reasons for this.

    11. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by jd_esguerra · · Score: 2
      And just leave the bodies hanging from the rope, to rot, just to remind people what this is all about. You gotta get Old Skool, my fellow Americans, or else, ya gonna go 3rd world. Just my ever humble opinion....

      Oh, great post! Claim that we're headed for third-world status, and then follow up with a call for mob-style lynching! Wow is that backwards.

      "Humble" opinion? I think you confused the word "humble" with the word "stupid." This being the USA, you are more than welcome to express your opinions. I might even take note of them occasionally. Here is a tip: Your opinion will probably carry more weight with intelligent people when it isn't self-contradictory and doesn't convey the image of the author (you) being a "redneck high-school dropout." (No offense to real rednecks.)

      Shit. I was even considering modding you up so so people could read your post and laugh at you.

    12. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      >>Do you realize that by interconnecting your economies you make war a lot less likely.

      That is what a lot of people said in 1900. We know what happened by 1914.

    13. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to Tibet and Taiwan and the blacks in South Africa, or to to Iran or Cuba befora the economis there collapsed and we got disasters there. Or tell it to Iraq and Panama before the dictators there, who were previously happy to buy weapons from the US and trade in corruption to "fight Communism" or "fight Muslim terror" from within their own palaces of capital corruption, became so outlandish that we decided to pry them out by force.

      "Interconnecting economies" to fight corruption, terror against your own populace, or enslavement of your population without allowing them the benefits of your sales to the West only works so far. For a better example of how capitalist leverage can displace a corrupt government, look at South Africa where US businesses finally wound up refusing to do business because it wasn't profitable, and where losses of productivity due to the inneficiencies of slavery finally toppled the local government.

      The disparity of income between the ruling elite and the software and CD duplicating, mislabeled blue jeans sewing populace in China is in itself effectively slavery. Make China actually enforce trademark laws and international copyright treaties, employee safety laws they have on the books and minimum wage laws they have but don't enforce, and child labor laws they've already signed under international treaties before you actually hire engineers there.

    14. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Cryofan · · Score: 1

      put ME in congress and I will end the "war on Terror" and begin the "War on corporatism."

      Then, if you put in enough other congressmen like me, we will start indicting, trying, and convicting the free trader politicians and CEOs. And we gonna hang they asses in PUBLIC. We gonna watch them motherfuckers dance at the end of a new rope, Old Skool style. And leave they bodies hang up there, and shit....all in accordance with due process of law....

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    15. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by Cryofan · · Score: 1

      you "forgot" to include the part of my quote where I called for indicting and trying and convicting them first. I realize you are just an high grade idiot, but lynching are what ya call "extrajudicial." For you, that means--> NO COURTROOM. Hence, I am not calling for lynching. I am calling for deterrence-based punishment. When future greedheads see old corpses hanging in Washington, they won't sell us out anymore. See how that works?

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    16. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by danro · · Score: 1
      That is what a lot of people said in 1900. We know what happened by 1914.
      True, but look at the EU now.
      This is probably the first time in history there is a lasting peace in europe, and make no mistake, that is because of the interconnected economies.

      Peace in Europe was one of the goals of ECSC (that later evolved into the EU of today).
      Being mutually dependant on each other is a good way to prevent war.
      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    17. Re:Outsourcers are treasonous traitors. Hang them by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

      The EU is based upon different priorities than than our current "race-to-the-bottom", pit "all-against-all" (*) Globalization model of the USA.

      * - Where all is the working / middle classes, and the rich get the tax cuts!

  53. Did you say offshoring? by eldawg · · Score: 1

    Since Mr Lee is a Google employee, will he now be working on outsourcing Google jobs to China?

  54. Religious right by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Ignorance is bliss. Have faith. etc.

    In the west at the moment, stupidity, ignorance are integral to our culture, even those who are irreligious and are worn like badges of honour.

    --
    Deleted
  55. Re:This Lawsuit will be the Gift that Keeps on GIv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, nobody wants to hear about your sick masturbatory fantasies.

  56. 2old2rockNroll is idiot by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

    You're right. The article is sensationalistic crap.

    The best of all is - the way he put it, it looks like while MS exports jobs, Google hires this PhD guy Lee to open a fucking kindergarten or something.

    1. Re:2old2rockNroll is idiot by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The best of all is - the way he put it, it looks like while MS exports jobs, Google hires this PhD guy Lee to open a fucking kindergarten or something.

      Or maybe you have a reading comprehension problem. Whatever Lee is doing for Google has nothing to do with the blurb or what Microsoft has been claiming. They have publicly bemoaned the number of CS gradutes and have been lobbying the feds to increase the H-1B cap, while in fact they aren't interested in hiring locally.

      From this, we can see that Microsoft had an unbelievable 50% increase in income during the last year while headcount increased by less than 3,000. Since we know that MS is "growing the work force" in China by over 1,000 per year and an unknown but most likely similar number in India (and smaller numbers for other countries), that leaves little, nothing, or negative job growth for the US. It is also interesting that there is a quid pro quo with the Chinese based on jobs, which was certainly not public information. You can return to your astroturfing now, and that should be "an idiot".

    2. Re:2old2rockNroll is idiot by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      The best of all is - the way he put it, it looks like while MS exports jobs, Google hires this PhD guy Lee to open a fucking kindergarten or something.

      Wow. You must have been on the college debating team. Start with a blazing ad hominem attack, don't read anything, and finish up with a blistering misinterpretation. There probably was an idiot involved in the argument.

      I think he was right: you are astroturfing. Does Bill pay overtime for Slashdotting on holidays?

    3. Re:2old2rockNroll is idiot by Sux2BU · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft is having zero or negative job growth in the US why did it just move to expand it's corporate campus in Redmond?

    4. Re:2old2rockNroll is idiot by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      Because Ballmer wants a bigger office, and they need another vault for their money?

  57. Outsourcing is a not good by nycstuie · · Score: 1

    I've dealt with outsourcing and insourcing of people from India for many years and the talent level is very low. The long-term problems these deals have created are compounding. The turnaround time to make simple changes to a system are unbelievable. I can wait 2 weeks for a simple 1 line fix that should take 5 minutes. And the amount of communication and documentation it takes is amazing. Below are a list of issues with outsourcing to India and China: - talent level is low - personal drive is low - communication is near impossible - poor analysis skills (big part of quality IT); they sit and wait for spoon feeding - lack of understanding- unwillingness to fill in the obvious blanks - no "can do" attitude but there is a "can't do" attitude - very poor coding practices leading to much higher costs down the road - timezone differences - lack of trust - national security (how can American companies allow India and China to control our systems?) In summation, outsourcing and using low pay workers from other regions lowers IT systems quality and raises costs long-term. For me I've made a great consulting career cleaning up the messes created by this practice. Isin't outsourcing now called smartsourcing because outsourcing sucks? Outsourcing is pure political crap. Wesley Clark once said in a speech that IT systems should all be sent to other countries and America should focus on energy. That sums it up. The heart of the American company is IT systems and there are still people out there that want to put it in India and Chinas hands. America is in deep trouble if this continues.

    1. Re:Outsourcing is a not good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in a help desk environment, you find many of those same complaints, particularly issues regarding talent and communication. While there seems to be a distrubing trend to look at help desk work as the IT equivalent of flipping burgers, it is IT work, it is important, and the people who work the help desk are the first ones to hear about problems when something goes down.

      Of the issues stated above, communication is the single largest problem with outsourcing help desk functions. Not merely communication between departments, but communication between internal and external "customers." You know what you're doing with a computer. I know what I'm doing with a computer. The vast majority of those non-IT related people simply do NOT know what they're doing with a computer. They usually turn it on and get it to come up to the Desktop, though I've seen a few people fail to get even that far for ridiculous reasons. When these benighted souls call into the help desk, and find they're talking to somebody in India, the following scenarios usually occur:

      1) The Indian help desk cold transfers the caller to the US without doing any sort of troubleshooting.
      2) The Indian help desk tells the caller they're going to transfer the caller to a manager, then cold transfer it to the US to be picked up by first level help desk reps who are immediately asked "Are you a manager?" Outrage ensues.
      3) The Indian help desk makes a complete hash out of the caller's computer, either failing to fix the issue at best or creating all new issues on top of the one that the caller wanted to deal with at worst, then transfers the caller over to the US for them to sort it out.
      4) The caller immediately demands to be transferred over to a US help desk. Usually, this is done almost immediately, but the US help desk has to listen to the caller bemoan the fact that they were talking to somebody in India for the whole of fifteen seconds.

      There are variations on the theme, to be sure, but those seem to be the four most common results of routing a call to India only to have it routed back here to the States.

      It's a reasonable theory that there are some exceedingly talented Indians, Chinese, and Filipinos out there in the IT or CS fields. However, I can't say I've had any contact with one who actually demonstrated it. 'Course, I've known more than a few IT people here in the States who couldn't pour sand out of a boot with the instructions printed on the heel. While the balance sheet looks good to the bean counters, the costs in time wasted and efficiency lost trying to undo the complications and confusion generated is considerably higher, and badly unaccounted for.

  58. Not a surprise at all... by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    Companies offshore all the time. The big significance of this is that Microsoft is one of those places where much of the R&D is still being done in the US. They probably perceive that they're not getting the same quality of new talent from the education system. Like it or not, the assertions that education overseas takes a much higher priority in people's lives is absolutely true. If the US doesn't want to become a nation of low-skilled workers and managers, we need to think about this.

    Research and development will continue to move to countries where the workforce is better educated. If you don't want this to happen, and you have kids, you'd better beat it into them that the only way they'll be able to compete with millions of Chinese or Indians is through brainpower.

    I don't know about the rest of the IT world, but I approach my job from an engineering perspective. I test, document, and research things very carefully. Consequently, stuff I build or design doesn't break often, and it's simpler to fix when it does.

    I don't see this kind of approach followed by a lot of people in IT. There's a lot of "hack on it until it works" going on. Granted, sometimes that's the only way to solve truly wierd problems in a timely manner, but at least document your hacks!!

  59. Funny that....... by mormop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last Wednesday I see this:

    China Daily covers an anti-Linux FUD campaign being run by the China Software Industry Association. "Sun Yufang, a Chinese scholar who has long been researching Linux software, says most Linux developers cannot make a living under the current business model. Most of these developers 'either have died or have focused on other businesses in past years,' Sun says."

    And then today:

    Google Lawsuit Exposes Microsoft Offshoring Deal.

    I wonder if these two events are in any way related?

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  60. Microsoft... why software should not have owners. by twitter · · Score: 1, Troll
    why is this significant again? Companies offshore all the time.

    If you work for Microsoft, it's very significant. You may soon be fired as your job is done by two or three competent Chinese slaves. This is simply an enlargement of their Chinese that will cost 1,000 employees their jobs.

    If use Microsoft, you might be concerned by your software's origin. Microsoft proudly claims to be a US company. That's getting harder for them to say. A few years ago, Microsoft swore in court that releasing the source code to Windoze would represent a national security risk. They have since sold peeks at that software to China and the former KGB. They have set up places in India and China to actually write their "product". So, owned in the US but made and developed in China. Nice.

    This exposes the non-free software end game: slavery. Microsoft is non-free software. You can't share it with your friends, study it, improve it or even run it as you please. They have the backing of US and just about every other country's laws. They are also working on hardware, mostly made in China, that does not allow you to run anything else. With China's co-operation, they will win. China is also non-free, in the worst of ways and this is why it's so cheap to get things done there. Now, very few benefit from Microsoft's ownership of software and the intentional waste of the upgrade train. As Microsoft fires it's own employees, you will see that the ultimately only one or two owners with zero tech knowledge will benefit as the rest of us are stripped of choice, privacy, freedom of press.

    It's ugly, very ugly.

    Further reading can be found GNU:

    Microsoft has never been your friend and friends that help you by screwing others will always turn on you. It's been said before and I'll say it again. Companies have obligations to customers, employees and share holders. A company that screws any one of these will eventually screw all three. It's all part of believing that it's OK to screw people.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  61. Re:I don't get it. GOOD JOB MODS by kihjin · · Score: 1

    That's funny. Way to go moderators! Mod the truth as flamebait.

    Good show.

    --
    This slashdot-related signature is a stub. You can help kihjin by expanding it.
  62. A few questions ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    I'm not intending this remark as flamebait (I'm really not) and irrational responses will be ignored, but ... the benefits of "outsourcing" or "offshoring" as a part of the so-called "global economy" are obvious when it comes to nations such as China or India. The net effect is a massive transfer of wealth and hard-earned technology being made from the U.S. to those countries (among others.)

    First question: can this be justified in terms of long-term economic benefit to the United States, or is it really just another form of foreign aid?

    A number of posters seem to feel that other countries are somehow entitled to a chunk of the America's wealth (for reasons that can usually be summed up with "it's the global economy, stupid" which is just another way of saying "we want your stuff, dude.") Now that's all fine and dandy, but if a nation wants to be a "trading partner" with another, then both should reap substantial benefit: I simply do not see that happening in this case. Yes, we are getting a stream of cheap imports from China, Taiwan, Malaysia, you name it ... at the cost of our own industrial base. And yes, it is our fault for allowing this to happen, but that doesn't change the fact that it is happening.

    Second question: from the perspective of U.S.-based business, is participation in the global economy worth what we're paying for it?

    Up 'til the time of World War II, we were a pretty insular bunch here in the U.S. Our increased participation in world affairs stemmed from that period, and has expanded to where we have lost the economic independence that our Founders so worked so hard to leave us. In fact, our economic well-being is so intimately tied to that of other major (even hostile) powers around the world that we cannot really be considered "economically independent" at all.

    Third question: Is this a good thing?

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:A few questions ... by danro · · Score: 1

      Answer to the first question:
      Do you honestly think a company feels they need to justify their actions in terms of what is good for the US? Or for any other country?
      And "foreign aid" it is most definitly not, since it is done purely out of self interest.

      Question two:
      They obviously think so, or they wouldn't do it.

      Third question:
      It depends on who you are.
      For me? Probably bad.
      For the world at large? I don't know, yet.



      Corporations, by design, will fuck anyone over for a percentage, American, Chinese or otherwise.

      But in the long run there are benefits to a world where nations are more mutually dependent on each other. It should cut down on war a bit (Look at the EU for example, Now is like the first time in history we aren't constantly killing each other over here. w00t!).

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  63. If I weren't already running Linux. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . I'd be dumping Windows due to Microsoft's selling out and offshoring jobs.

  64. Will End Once Windows Code Is Stolen By Chinese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and Indians.

    The campus may look the same, but the social behavior is different: the Chinese and Indians will steal any intellectual idea they find. Microsoft, like Cisco, will soon find itself competing with a Chinese mirror company with 200,000 programmers and complete access to their source code. Neither firm (Microsoft nor its Chinese clone) will produce a decent operating system, of course.

  65. Mod parent up! by markedmann · · Score: 1

    Someone mod up the parent post! You say more Asians are more intelligent / harder workers, and I say give me a break. Every race has hard workers _and_ lazy people.

  66. MS in China: trying to have its cake and eat it by hsuwh · · Score: 3, Informative

    MS has been trying to build bridges to China for more than seven years: first in founding Microsoft Research China (now MSR Asia), a pure research facility that eventually became an R&D wing. Kai-Fu Lee, the former exec being sued for going to Google, founded MSR China in 1998 and came back to Redmond in 2000.

    Several years back Ballmer shook hands on a $100M outsourcing plsu $20M investment deal that senior management found it hard to live up to, and so they amended it to $55M in jobs and $60M in investments in Chinese IT.

    If you look at the Seattle Times article, there are links to the court filings, including KFL's deposition, where he indicates that a major part of his work on MS's international business since coming back to the states, has been keeping MS from making blunders. These include making ill-advised promises that it hasn't been able to live up to, and (if it had) would have meant outsourcing at a rate that would strip American jobs, despite its assurances.

    Mirosoft's China strategy is starting to fall apart as its hiring has slowed stateside and it becomes evident that it's trying to have its cake and eat it too.

    --
    ICQ: 28651394 = AIM/MSN/YIM: hsuwh = www.livejournal.com/~banazir
  67. No Comparative Advantage by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Many of them (outside the US), after all the trade deficit will make the dollar fall like a brick.

    Agreed. Our lopsided trading habits are risking an ugly mega-bubble. The US no longer has any real comparative advantages. I cannot name any significant ones, can you? Innovation? Are 3 Indians for the same price really less innovative than one American? Dream on.

  68. Re:This Lawsuit will be the Gift that Keeps on GIv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get the popcord and sit back

    You sick man

  69. Not about jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are billions of dollars lost by MS to piracy in China... Moving jobs there is just a way to get the Chinese government to help crack down on piracy of MS products.

  70. Nuclear Option Available for at least 10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The fact remains in order to compete with Asia we are going to have to work harder, invest more in education and sorry to say this... work for less. It is either that or unionize.

    We could nuke them instead, guaranteeing US dominance for hundreds of years.

  71. There aren't that many "best and brightest" by melted · · Score: 1

    There aren't that many "best and brightest", you see. MSR China has been around for a looong while and I have yet to see anything significant to come out of it. As far as I'm concerned, as long as groups can be separated and as long as what MSFT gets back is state of the art software - go ahead, ship it over there. However, I have yet to see a top notch piece of code developed in PRC or India.

    Over the entire dot-com "bust" there wasn't a single big layoff at Microsoft. Even when people are laid off, they're laid off in small groups and offered an opportunity to find a position elsewhere within he Co. As of right now I'm not aware of anyone technical who could not find such a position. There are also thousands of open positions, both here and in India/PRC.

    And if you're GOOD, you have nohing to be afraid of at Microsoft, not for at least the next five years. Because there's a shortage of people who are GOOD.

  72. let's do the math -- Bill did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bill Gates says today that there are not enough CS grads. Now let's say every freshman who was going to major in something else suddenly got religion instead of majoring in it decides by golly I'm gonna study CS and be a crack coder...and has the ability to do so. Maybe your numbers are different, but by my measure that means 13 years from now you will have a seasoned engineer with a degree and a number of years of experience.

    How is it hypocrisy for MS to recognize this and decide not to wait a decade for the decline in CS grads to MAYBE reverse itself?

    Americans liked capitalism until it started happening to us.

  73. CNN bandwagon of CEOs outsourcing US jobs by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Actually Lou Dobbs has an hour show that airs at 6-7 p.m. ET Monday-Friday on CNN where he spends a lot of tyme about how American companies outsource. Here's a list of companies he keeps on Exporting America:

    Falcon
  74. Investing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the flip side, might as well invest money in their stock since they will screw you over anyway. Sort of like investing in oil companies two years ago.

  75. Re:Microsoft... why software should not have owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Moderators: Please note that "twitter" is a known fanatical sycophant whose obnoxious offtopic rants are legend here on Slashdot. It doesn't matter what the topic is, he'll find a way to scrape in some pointless Microsoft bashing. While nobody expects us to love Microsoft in any way, his particularly tepid style of calling anyone he replies to "troll" or "liar" or "fanboy" because he happens to disagree with whatever they're saying is well documented and should not be rewarded. If anything, twitter is the type of person that should not be part of the open source/free software community. He is an anathema to all that is good about free software.

    I'm posting this so that you (the moderator) have some context to consider twitter and not mod him up whenever he posts his filler preformatted rants about installing Knoppix or Mepis or whatever that unfortunately get him karma every single time and allow him to continue posting his trademark toxic crap (read on) day in and day out. You may consider this a troll - I consider it community service. And I ain't kidding.

    If you're a /. subscriber, I invite you to look through some of his posting history. I guarantee that you'll be hard pressed to find someone that is more "out there" than twitter. You'll also probably notice he's got quite an AC following. Don't just read his posts, make sure you go through the replies.

    To get an idea of what I'm talking about, check this post out. This is an article about email disclaimers. The parent of the post is complaining about the ads in the linked page and so on, and twitter actually goes off on a rant to blame it on Microsoft and recommend Lynx, because "is teh free".

    Here's another. In this post twitter not only calls the OP a troll but attempts to "tell it like it is" while making some vague argument about "GNU". Yes, if you're confused, you're not alone. The reply (modded +4) proceeds to simply destroy his bogus argument. You will notice he did not reply. This is what some people call "drive-by advocacy". A sort of I'll just leave you with my thoughts here and move on to the next flamebait kind of deal. In fact, he almost never replies because he knows that his fanatical arguments simply do not hold up to any sort of discussion. It's not that he's chosen the wrong cause - he's just going at it in a completely wrong way.

    Here's that drive-by advocacy and FUD in motion: twitter goes on about some topic and then drops the usual "oh and M$ is teh evil" because "WMP phones home" or some such. Called on his FUD, he then claims that WMP stores every song and movie you've ever played in a file, somewhere. Pressed further, he just sort of slithers out of sight, his FUD-spreading complete. This is not about some Microsoft technology that nobody likes anyway; it's about lying for the sake of lying. Way too many of his posts are exactly like this one.

    More? Just read though this post and the subsequent replies. I guess this stands on its own. Or these two. Or this one. Or this one.

    Still not convinced? This is what twitter considers "humour" while going about his daily "M$" routine.

    M

  76. Tax shelter dude by darkharlequin · · Score: 1

    Us companies do not pay taxes on offshored labor, therefore its at least 7.65% cheaper--no payroll tax.

    --
    i am so very tired....
  77. Re:Microsoft... why software should not have owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wow twitter! congratulations, you've found a brand new way to bash "M$"!! Incredible! It's "ugly, very ugly" indeed!

    Please twitter, now that you've established that "M$" is indeed evil because they've showed the "Windoze" source code to the "KGB", enlighten us with your opinions on IBM, Novell, Sun, RedHat and every other software company that engages in outsourcing. And I'd like to remind you that you're posting on Slashdot, owned by OSDN, which makes products that help companies manage outsourcing (and they advertise as much).

    C'mon now twitter, let's hear it. Let's hear how Microsoft is "firing its own employees". A link and some proof (instead of random links to Stallman's essays, which lately are also used to rationalize the pirating of Harry Potter books) would be welcome.

    Thanks!

  78. WTF, do you understand logic? by geekee · · Score: 1

    "Is it possible that Bill Gates' recent lament over the decline of US CS graduates and research spending was merely crocodile tears?"

    Maybe Microsoft is searching for talent in China because the talent doesn't exist in the US in large enough numbers, which is why Bill Gates laments that there's not enough CS graduates in the US. I don't see the hypocrisy here.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  79. What about Apple? by geekee · · Score: 1

    " Microsoft can't keep buying the U.S. government off forever; eventually, someone is going to assume the U.S. presidency who will actually allow the department of justice to enforce antitrust law and hold it for long enough for a case against Microsoft to be litigated."

    So when is Apple going to be prosecuted for anti-trust violations? Rio just got put out of business. Apple is clearly leveraging two monopolies to strengthen each. Where's the justice? As you say:
    "remember that monopolies hurt markets"

    get a clue.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  80. you're going to COLLEGE?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But your language skills are grade school!

    I think you fib.

  81. if microsoft hires such smart people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why TF do you produce such shit software? christ, you'd think the richest company in the history of humanity could create something that a. works, and b. can't be penetrated by a semi-skilled cracker in five minutes. sheeesh.

  82. I feel really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 2 technical degrees from one of the top universities in the world, I'm a published author, and I'm a director of IT architecture at a fortune 1000 company and I can't make head or tale of your post.

    Since you seem to be somewhat intelligent, I'll assume its the 5th of Jack Black I just downed before dinner.

  83. implication for clippy? by the-build-chicken · · Score: 1

    "It eyes sees you letter want perhaps?"

  84. Its pretend theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its pretend theft.

    And a lot of people have decided not to pretend anymore and the ease of copying means that if you built your business hoping everybody will pretend with you, then you're basically f'ed.

    Too bad for people who thought everybody would play along with their pretend game of "intellectual property".

  85. Bill Gates' concerns are legitimate... by rdean400 · · Score: 1

    The perception of corporate america is that the colleges & universities aren't cranking out enough talent. Microsoft is turning to China because they're cranking out people that are qualified to do development work.

    The real issue is that this is a vicious cycle: offshoring is done (only in part) due to a lack of qualified CS graduates in the U.S., but offshoring is one of the main reasons CS degrees don't look very good right now.

    1. Re:Bill Gates' concerns are legitimate... by Farohar · · Score: 1

      I disagree. There is no dearth of talent in the country. However, what needs to be overhauled is the American lifestyle and above all - values. In a land that overly worships the human body and physical prowess, where fashion models, movie "stars", "rock stars" and basketball players with IQs of idiots are paid tens of millions of dollars, the human mind takes second place. And to add insult to injury, practitioners of the human mind are expected to continuously "deliver the goods". And deliver them to whom? To those who have no concept of the word "THINK". Mathematics, physics and the sciences are abandoned in preference to college courses in Music, until the future musician begins the course. Then there is a rude awakening - Hell! Music and Math are the same!! So what was he/she expecting? Heavy Metal? Next step? Drugs! Only an unhealthy mind needs to get stoned.

    2. Re:Bill Gates' concerns are legitimate... by rdean400 · · Score: 1

      That only serves to support my point. The lack of quality CS graduates in this country is, in part, a result of CS not being perceived as a job skill with a future ... due to offshoring. As with many math and science-oriented majors, there is a rapidly rising proportion of foreign students earning Bachelors degrees in the U.S.

      Another part of this is cultural upbringing...parents aren't adequately preparing their students for the realities of life. They're trying to get the schools to do this job, but the schools aren't any better at it due to their focus on teaching their students to pass the government-mandated standardized tests. Students are left with a whole lot of theories about what real life is like after school, but with no real knowledge -- other than they don't want to be their parents...working harder and harder but with no real security.

    3. Re:Bill Gates' concerns are legitimate... by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to see you take a break from passing out bibles in the street and doing christian radio fundraisings. If the unhealthy mind is the only one that needs to get stoned, I think we should create a category of Weird Ass Fuckers who Ought to Get Stoned. I add you to the list as #1.

  86. Re:If you pay people, they will come by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    Your assumption regarding corporate motives is essentially correct. The same trend seen in white collar jobs can also be seen regarding blue collar jobs, except that those corporations that do the hiring "don't need no stinkin' visas". Depending upon who you rely upon for statistics, there are between 12 million and 28 million illegal aliens in the USA today. You don't actually think there are that many agricultural "migrant worker" jobs available, do you?

    In 2003, 78,000 IT workers in Connecticut were layed off. That same year, Connecticut IT employers requested (and received) 68,000 additional H1-B visa slots from Congress.

    In 2000, the Clinton administration prosecuted 334 USA employers for knowingly having hired illegal aliens. In 2003, the Bush administration prosecuted only 13 USA employers for the same criminal activity.

    These are neither isolated or unrelated factoids -- they are illustative of what our Federal government, "our" Congress-critters, and our "true-blue" USA corporations are doing every day.

    BTW:
    H1-B visa: foreign white collar worker under contract to a domestic employer.

    L1-A visa: foreign white collar worker transferred from domestic employer's overseas subsidiary.

    The numbers of both types of white collar worker visas have gone up dramatically in the last five years.

  87. Hear ye, hear ye, get your papers for free! by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    And yet for another Slashdot'n against the (cough, ahem) dual-axis "evil" empires, Chinese leader visits Microsoft campus.

    Obligatory link

  88. Rather simple, really by everphilski · · Score: 1

    It's rather simple, really. Your money is being used to help other companies build their empire. If they succeed they pay you back - with interest according to their success. If they fail, it's a losing proposition.

    Check out fool.com or any other investment site for investment 101 info. You don't need a lot of money to start investing and everyone should be. Social security probably won't be around to take care of us when the time comes, even if it is that wouldn't be much of a life :).

    -everphilski.

  89. Java, C#, Win32, VB6 better now ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are any of these better now?

    a) GUI programming
    b) Batch / File processing
    c) RPC based processing
    d) Browser rendered content
    e) Numerical

    Only RPC based processing (.NET remoting, Java, etc) is any better or easier than it was in 1995.

    The last 10 years haven't impvoved upon most software development functional areas.

    The fad based software development buzzwords over the last decade haven't helped improve the quality or productivity of software developers.

  90. Not because of race. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a matter of races. It's a matter of needs. Americans have had a level of welfare good enough for a long time, and no longer have to work really hard to have a decent live. An average American without any degree can work six hours a day and have the goods almost everyone else (excluding Europe) can't even dream about. I live in a South American country, and my wife, an engineer that speaks five languages, has a master degree and an excellent professional background doesn't make half as much as a hamburger cook makes in the US. And stuff here isn't any cheaper than in the US. So we have to work hard to get the same an American gets barely working. It's not that Americans are lazy. They are just practical. If you can live decently working eight hours a day, why work sixteen? Chinese (and other people around the world) can't afford that luxury.

  91. Er, you mean generating new TPMs... by leonbrooks · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...the better to entangle competitors in DMCA-like laws with?
    They are full time employees delivering important components of large products.
    Like that snippet of encrypted code in Win 3.11 that detected DR-DOS and crashed? Or badge-engineering BSD FTP? Or writing an XboX BIOS that deliberately shuts down if you replace the hard drive with something bootable? Or devising a weapon with which to kill Google?

    Not trashing Asian IT workers, since they often outproduce Australians in Australia and are generally no more incompetent, but I really don't think you grok the focus of "important" in the eyes of Microsoft's management.
    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  92. If he's a shareholder, why, yes, it _is_ his money by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    D'oh!

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  93. Can all the Americans read and write Chinese? by dweezeldude · · Score: 1

    I am in complete agreement with the poster that this is alomst non-news. A global company is hiring people globally. How else would you have good design in different language? I sincerly doubt all the mono speaking Americans work efforts could produce products acceptable to most of the people on the world. So a thousand people to serve more than a billion people sounds pretty conservative to me. I would think that they would need tens of thousands of people to stay competitive in the Chinese market.

  94. The Chinese by Farohar · · Score: 1

    Bill Gates onced remarked that after the Chinese, South Indians were the smartest people in the world. I am hereby correcting his perception of the Chinese. They are better than South Indians at just one thing - Industrial Spying. The South Indians are born mathematicians and are the smartest. They do not resort to spying of any kind. Although their mentality and thought processes need to be revamped concerning concepts such as Money, Wealth and Self Esteem, I would still take them anytime, anywhere, cause they are reliable. And now, we have the Chinese President visiting Microsoft and to add insult to injury, he's Insulted - yes, Insulted, for crying out loud -because Bill did not export enough of our livelihoods to the Communists.

  95. SPAMMING ASSHOLES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, what the fuck is slashdot? Don't answer, because I frankly don't give a shit. Who the hell do you people think you are? HOW FUCKING DARE YOU send me UNSOLICITED MAIL - That means SPAM in case you fuckwits don't know it. How stupid are you people? You send me spam that says ---- Public Service Announcement Brought to You by SPAMIS : Strategic Partnership Against Microsoft Illegal Spam Oh, so you are against Microsoft Illegal spam and you want to bring people's attention to it by SPAMMING OTHER PEOPLE? Get a fucking clue you assholes. And no, I did not "sign up" because the ONLY place the address you spammed me at is listed is on my domain name registrations. Also, why did YOUR spam come to me with MY OWN address as the "Sender"? Easy. Because YOU ASSHOES ARE SPAMMING. Go fuck yourselves. How can you be taken seriously? You are obviously not AGAINST spam because you SPAM people. P.S. Moderate the fuck out of this. See if I care. FUCKWITS

    1. Re:SPAMMING ASSHOLES by JPDeckers · · Score: 1
      Nice, I also got a couple right now on my domain-registration addresses. First time they linked to a site (instead of the usual bullshit talk).

      Seems he started half an hour ago.

      More info about SPAMIS:
      http://antivirus.about.com/od/emailscams/a/spamis. htm

    2. Re:SPAMMING ASSHOLES by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      Got one too. What a bunch of shit man,.

    3. Re:SPAMMING ASSHOLES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Expect lots more pissed off people. SPAM sucks worse than MS. I defer to the gentleman who spoke wisely when he said "HOW FUCKING DARE YOU send me UNSOLICITED MAIL - That means SPAM in case you fuckwits don't know it. How stupid are you people?" I have to believe the spammer has eaten too many penis pills and lost his spamming mind.

      This forum is now ground zero evven for those who may have sympathized with the report. You get no sympathy from me. Bill Gates, if you just spammed every PC in the nation in a reverse psychology move, it was an absolutely brilliant idea. Now you hate the spammer more than Bill.

    4. Re:SPAMMING ASSHOLES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot isn't the spammer here. I don't bother with reporting spam with Spamcop anymore, but this SPAMIS idiot is spamming with a political agenda, or maybe he just hates Microsoft. For those readers that don't know what this is about, here's a sample of the spam that this guy is sending. This is the first time a URL is mentioned and it being /. surprized me. Here's today's SPAMIS spam (received on an email addres that's never been used:

      Message-Id:
      Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 05:22:48 +0600
      From: (my postmaster address)
      To: (my postmaster address)
      Subject: BREAKING NEWS: Microsoft Plans to Outsource Over 10,000 Jobs to China
      MIME-Version: 1.0
      Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
      X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13
      X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3

      Saturday, September 3rd, 2005 - 12:20am
      SEATTLE TIMES / By Brier Dudley - Technology Reporter

      MICROSOFT PLANS TO STOP SUPPORTING THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
      BY OUTSOURCING MORE THAN 10,000 JOBS OVER 10 YEARS TO CHINA

      http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstech nology/2002468560_msftgoogle03.html

      ----- ---- --- -- - -
      Microsoft is on track to outsource more than 1,000 jobs a year
      to China, according to blistering evidence released yesterday
      in Microsoft's increasingly nasty spat with Google over an
      employee who jumped ship in July.

      In a revelation that highlights the complexity of China
      President Hu Jintao's visit to Seattle and Microsoft on Monday,
      legal filings detailed claims of how Microsoft had offended the
      Chinese government by not outsourcing as many jobs as promised
      to Chinese technology vendors.

      COMMENTS AT: http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/09/04/225 6208&tid=109&tid=218

      ----- ---- --- -- - -
      Public Service Announcement Brought to You by SPAMIS :
      Strategic Partnership Against Microsoft Illegal Spam
      ----- ---- --- -- - -

      [ SPAMIS NOTIFICATION ]:

      Thanks to Individual and Server Contributions, SPAMIS is Now "FULLY READY"
      to Begin Increasing Microsoft Public Service Announcement Emails to 20 Times
      the Amount of Internet Email Users by 25 Times the Current Sending Rate &
      Speed When a Certain Activity Transpires to "ANY" Past, Present or Future
      SPAMIS Member(s) and/or "ANY" SPAMIS Affiliate(s).

      [ CURRENTLY IN WAITING FOR THIS ACTIVITY TO TRANSPIRE TO BEGIN ]
      [ SPAMIS / PO Box 1259, Seattle, WA 98101 - USA }

  96. you ~~#&# spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not need your e-mails, and I do not care for the same stuff you do... You are the same shit you're supposed to fight. LEAVE MY INBOX ALONE!!, YOU ARE THE TRUE FUC##@ COWARDS!!!

  97. Re:I don't get it. -- Tata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tata Consulting is hardly a picture of success. Their Oracle pros cheerfully admit that they're given 120 days of Oracle training and are declared, by Tata, to be experts. These experts brought down the whole production system of a major publishing company for almost two days to the tune of $6 million in losses - 6 times the $1 million savings which the publishing company boasted about. They will also cheerfully tell you that they're just using said publishing company as a proving ground so they can get jobs at G.E. And yet the layoffs continue and more Tata folks are brought in. But I will givem them this. They have successfully emulated the same contempt that most US consulting companies have for their clients. I guess that's something.

  98. Re:I don't get it. -- Tata by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    From what you write, it sounds like Tata is most definitely a picture of success. Despite poor performance, they keep getting more customers, and they make more money. That sounds like success to me.

    Success, for a business, is not how good a job it does. It's how much money it makes. If their products are crap, yet people keep giving them lots of money, the company is successful. Microsoft is a great example of this. Don't confuse "quality products and services" with "business success".

    Personally, I think that if Americans are stupid enough to keep hiring more and more Tata people even though it's hurting them in the long run, then more power to Tata. "A fool and his money are soon parted", and they usually deserve to be parted.

  99. Microsoft Outsourcing Jobs to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That really pisses me off. I'm a freelance programmer and I depend on this country having a good tech reputation for getting work. Plus, why send technology over-seas, when we've seen that technology has the major impact on economic development. Its almost as though microsoft wants China to be richer and the US to be poorer. I wonder who in Microsoft is making these decisions. Anyways, I'm going to start moving on over to Linux, cause this just pisses me off. Screw them all!