Slashdot Mirror


12Mbps Powerline Broadband Trial Unveiled

An anonymous reader writes "The tiny state of Tasmania in Australia has kicked off the country's first commercial powerline broadband trial. The service is capable of providing Internet connectivity of up to 12Mbps but during trials, it will be limited to 4Mbps. Costs will range from $12 (A$15) to $67 (A$80) per month for speeds between 256Kbps and 4Mbps. Powerline broadband has received wide support from leading vendors including Intel, Motorola and Cisco Systems -- all of whom support an organisation called the HomePlug Powerline Alliance."

316 comments

  1. Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that our once thought unfounded fears of someone programming our toaster to eat our dog are not not-so-radical?

    1. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Offtopic? You pansy. I'm being serious. Once this becomes commonplace, the old sci-fi troll we all thought was stupid and not technically feasable act of hacking into computer systems and messing with people on an entirely spooky level seems pretty doable once this becomes commonplace. How will we know that certain appliances aren't really network conscious? E.g. an override to turn a garbage disposal on remotely while someone's hand happens to be in it, or for the stove to fire up to enormous levels of heat as part of a now network-based assassination attempt. It all seems a bit too spooky to me. Yesterday, I could wake up and be confident that my stove wasn't going to blow up the house because it simply didn't have an ethernet cable. Some time in the future, smart stoves might be susceptible to hacking.

    2. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by jupiter909 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Anyperson with common sense and that reads warnings will see that it says. TURN OFF POWER BEFORE OPENING DEVICE. No matter how smart your garage disposal unit is, if you flick that switch at the wall it CAN NOT DO ANYTHING. As for smart fridges etc. A smart fridge would just report on what is needed for it, like new milk, cheese, juice. In Japan they have smart fridges that order needed goods. Things such as defrost/turn-on.off remain manual operations. The only thing I see smart in a stove we be sensors to report that it is working correctly and usage statistics, so that the manufactures can create better devices, you'd never get a remote turn on for a stove, those type functions will still be good old solid buttons and knobs to push.

    3. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      No matter how smart your garage disposal unit is

      They say Americans are wasteful, but that's just something else. I wonder what kind of power is required to turn a motor that big? ;)

      if you flick that switch at the wall it CAN NOT DO ANYTHING.

      Have cheesy horror movies about demonically possessed houses or intricate plans of Death taught you NOTHING?! Just flicking the switch is begging for a freak gust of wind, wandering fly or quantum indecision to flip that sucker back on when you are knuckle deep!

      Ah, I must go. The kind man in white is bringing me my dinner. I'm glad to see he's got the rubber cutlery.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by tppublic · · Score: 2, Informative
      Crikey... something like 75 cents of electronics from Radio Shack can build a frequency filter that will suppress frequences above 60Hz, so nothing could connect to the BPL network... you could even put them in your basement right as the electricity comes out of the circuit breakers... Or build a 1:1 transformer with the same filtering characteristics, or use a UPS that draws off of the battery, or... whatever. There are plenty of solutions.

      In fact, this has long been a security issue in HomePlug (which is distinct from BPL, though the submitter seems to have missed that), and there have been various recommendations for inserting a filter to avoid your neighbor being able to snoop your network.

    5. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by XenoRyet · · Score: 1

      I belive you will be able to rest assured that your garbage disposal will not be network conscious based on the simple fact that it will not have a network card. Nor will your stove, your microwave, or any other home appliance save your computer and your Tivo.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    6. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by SpecBear · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that stoves have been blowing up houses for years without any assistance from ethernet.

      Powerline broadband may be widespread in the future, but the cell phone network gets pretty good coverage right now. Your garbage disposal could have a cell phone build into it. Your toaster could be network aware right now. How would you know? Widespread WiFi presents the same problem.

      If someone wants to get you by turning your appliances against you, they can. They don't need powerline broadband to do it.

    7. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      can you explain how this is any different than existing wireless networks? how can you be assured that you garbage disposal doesn't have a wireless adapter and is connected to your wireless network?

    8. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1


      No matter how smart your garage disposal unit is

      They say Americans are wasteful, but that's just something else. I wonder what kind of power is required to turn a motor that big? ;)

      It's really just 11 amps or so.... Hell, you can even get a cordless one!

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    9. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Obfuscant · · Score: 2
      I belive you will be able to rest assured that your garbage disposal will not be network conscious based on the simple fact that it will not have a network card. Nor will your stove, your microwave, or any other home appliance save your computer and your Tivo.

      You've missed the entire home automation discussion then, have you?

      Telling your stove to start the cooking program for tonight's dinner certainly is a feature for home automation, as is the ability to ask the stove how much longer is left until the roast is done. Or being able to contact it from work to say "I'll be home late, do NOT start cooking the roast yet." Having the refridgerator know what is inside and how old it is (via RFID) and then automatically order from the store (or simply email a reminder "you need more milk" to the home owner) certainly is on the agenda for home automation.

      Since garbage disposals do need a certain amount of use to remain functional (cleaning gunk out, for one thing), it is not far-fetched for that unit to be online to report to the owner. Certainly just having it online to record power consumption is a handy feature.

      I currently have an X10 interface (serial) into the net, and it is not beyond reason to see X10 interfaces replaced by direct network connections, so that you control lights and outlets via the net.

      The belief that only your computers and TIVO will be on the net is a bit naive -- perhaps not for today's appliances, but certainly for those of tomorrow.

    10. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Intron · · Score: 1

      "if you flick that switch at the wall it CAN NOT DO ANYTHING

      Maybe you didn't notice that the switch on the wall is now connected to the network, too. Who would want an ordinary wall switch, when you can have a Windows 2012 SmartSwitch (TM).

      "you'd never get a remote turn on for a stove"

      I guess no-one will ever put appliances in their kitchen that automatically turn on at a preset time so your dinner will be ready. That's way too Jetsons.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    11. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by jimmypw · · Score: 0

      "Some time in the future, smart stoves might be susceptible to hacking"
      Might?!?! 99% of everything to do with computers is hackable i'd say its more or less certain they could be. Depending ofcourse on what the function of the ethernet cable is for.

    12. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Oh sure, you're safe as long as your super smart garbage disposal hasn't used it's rotary blades to pull, splice, and respin your house electical wiring to reroute power around the off switch. What are you going to do, double check your home wiring every time you get a clog? C'mon, just stick your hand in, I assure you, it's just a clog. Bwah hah hah hah!

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    13. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by RicktheBrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Everything that uses electricity should be online at least locally. Even the electrical receptacle should have unique address so they can be idenified. The computer should know exactly what is drawing electricity and exactly how much is needed. Any variation would require a remedial action. Every receptacle would not have any current to it until something which has communicated with the circuit breaker with what it is and how much current it requires. Any product that is always plugged in such as a television or a stereo would require a password to work when it has lost power for more than a few seconds. If it does not get that password it just would not function. I would think one could eliminate alot of electricutions and electrical fires. I would also think one could eliminate most of the incentive that some people have to break into other's homes as electronic products would have no resale value without the proper password. They even could be made to report their location to authorities after they have been stolen.

    14. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by fshalor · · Score: 1

      You're right...

      Also ponder this:

      You know all that help Redcross and disaster peeps are getting from Amateur radio ops in LA right now? It's a lot. And you know what'll happen after BPL goes main stream: Kiss Ham's good bye. Cause the hobby will go down the tubes as most of the people in it will find they can't use the air waves that they're licensed to operate on anymore like they should.

      And to call up Johnny Nem.... Last thing we pretty much need at this point is more crud coming out of our electronic devices.

      I'll go shiver at the thought of my plugged in powertools being gremlined. Microwave? eh... Stove... Can opener. Coffe grinder! eh GadS!

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    15. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


      Yeah, and don't forget about your pool cleaner!

      They're telepathic, you know.

      Well, at least the deluxe models.

      billy - having second thoughts about about using Windows on his home shop CAD/CAM box

    16. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Edzor · · Score: 1

      I dont think a tinfoil hat would cut it, better tinfoil your whole house

    17. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by XenoRyet · · Score: 1

      That's not the point I was trying to make. I was trying to say that if you are the type who is afraid the disposal is going to get hacked and chew your arm off, you may simply purchase one that does not have a network card, and rest assured that no ammount of network activity on your power lines will result in your appliances being turned against you. You can stick to network card for things that probably won't blow up on you, like your comp and yoru Tivo.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
    18. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't there a movie like that? "Ghost in the Machine" was the name I think. A criminal died in an MRI machine and his "spirit" was "hacking" into dishwashers, stoves, microwaves, TV networks, and finally a particle accelerator.

    19. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Radio Shack? Been there lately? Those days are gone. I doubt there's more than 2 employees nation-wide that even recognize the word millihenry.

    20. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      Having the refridgerator know what is inside and how old it is (via RFID)

      Having just cleaned out my fridge yesterday because it was full, but there was nothing to eat, and finding jars of stuff that had a use by of 3 years ago, i would really like this technology...

      My pantry would also like this technology... something smells in there...

      So would my dog, as i keep running out of dog food and having to feed him my dinner. Hang on, maybe not...

    21. Re:Doesn't this frighten anyone... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Luckily, the people who deal with stuff that can kill you are actually mostly competent, and though they've had the ability to have remote kill switches longer than you or I have been alive, they will continue to have manual kill switches, very likely long after you and I are dead.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  2. Reasons to move to Australia: by Elrac · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Cheap, fast IP via powerline
    • No hurricanes!
    --
    When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called Rel
    1. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by grungebox · · Score: 4, Funny

      But on the downside, you have to be careful in case a dingo eats your baby.

    2. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      you have to be careful in case a dingo eats your baby

      Dude, this is /. - there's not much chance of them getting to second base, let alone procreating. :o)

    3. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheap, fast IP via powerline

      US$67/month for 4Mbps??
      I'm paying US$33/month for 8Mbps ADSL and I think that's outrageous (at least when compared to when I payed US$20/month for 10Mbps Ethernet in my student dorm).

      If I'm moving from Sweden to Australia or the USA it'll be for political reasons, certainly not because of "broadband" costs.

    4. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by g00n · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm married, and have a kid.. and I read /. daily.. Your point?

    5. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by sp3tt · · Score: 2, Funny

      The point missed you, obviously.

    6. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this, Soviet Russia???

    7. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      where is the -1 Liar! mod?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by justforaday · · Score: 1

      I just finished reading Bill Bryson's In a Sunburned Country (great read btw). From what he says, it sounds like there's a whole lot down there to potentially be afraid of (depending on your temperament)...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by AlanS2002 · · Score: 0

      On the first point, that's if the Australian Communications Managment Authority decides to give the go ahead for it to move beyond trials (apparently they are concerned about BPL interfereing with wireless communications, don't know the exact details though).

      --
      Not all conservatives are stupid,
      but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
      - Hume
    10. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i must be losing it...I didnt find anything in this funny thread funny. Until the Soviet Russia joke, which as of now, isnt modded funny. sigh.

    11. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 0

      Cheap? I don't know about that. I'm paying $35/mo for 100 Mbps cable Internet. Plus, people make about half as much in Oz. I'm surprised that they're charging as much as they are. Besides, there are plenty of reasons not to move to Australia:
      * Kangaroo attacks
      * You have to learn a new language
      * It's hot
      * They're all a bunch of criminals

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    12. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay 35$ a month for a 100Mbps connection?
      wow! what provider do you use?

    13. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by ElAurian · · Score: 1

      We have no hurricanes, this is true. No hurricane has ever even come close to the Australian mainland, not one.

      We do, however, have cyclones, which are these large, spiral-shaped storms with high winds and... you've heard of them? Bloody hell.

    14. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      Time-Warner cable's Roadrunner service. The price is garaunteed for 1 year, after which it will probably go up to $45/mo. I downloaded the Half Life 2 demo in under a half hour. :)

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    15. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Yep, we don't have hurricanes. We have Cyclones, but not a hurricane in sight.

    16. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by salty_oz · · Score: 1

      Moron!

      * Kangaroo attacks
            Tassie really only has wallabys - small versions of kangaroos. So you'll be pretty safe.

      * You have to learn a new language
            You sure will. They speak ENGLISH there.

      * It's hot
              Tassie hot. You have to be kidding. It's freezing and wet.

      * They're all a bunch of criminals
            That's true.

      --
      ln -s /dev/null /dev/clue
    17. Re:Reasons to move to Australia: by Engie_Viral · · Score: 1

      Yes, we aussies don't get Hurricanes. We are safe from your terrorist Huricane threats.


      Then again, technically, neither do you Americans. The proper name for a Hurricane (according to Wikipedia is a Tropical Cyclone, which is what we call them in Australia. And Just like you don't get "Hurricanes" in your northern states, we don't gey Cyclones in South of our country.

      Severe storms, however, can effect any area, no matter where you are.

  3. Los Angeles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Los Angeles is working on an implementation of electricity over power lines. Still a few bugs to work out in their implementation though, apparently.

  4. State of Tasmania? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tasmanian Devil reportedly not impressed. Already using 1GBit fiberoptic connection.

    1. Re:State of Tasmania? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Tasmanian Devil reportedly not impressed. Already using 1GBit fiberoptic connection.

      Has Taz made tenure at Tasmanian State U yet? All us univ crowd live off the Gigabit tether ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:State of Tasmania? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      That is what I've heard. He teaches Zoology with an emphasis on small and medium sized mammals and also Anger Management Strategies.

    3. Re:State of Tasmania? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      That is what I've heard. He teaches Zoology with an emphasis on small and medium sized mammals and also Anger Management Strategies.

      Ah. Tasmania, a place with a troubled past - and not a lot of gigabit internet to chop wood with.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  5. RRARGH! by Stanistani · · Score: 4, Funny

    Taz administer broadband network!
    NNNNyehhh, what's up doc?
    Taz eat hacker rabbit!

  6. Those MB per month limits are awful by Shivetya · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.tastel.com.au/bpl/price_broadband.html

    I bet I can do that in a day or two just patching a game? Or am I reading it wrong?

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Verteiron · · Score: 1

      Good gravy! I can only hope those are the "included webspace" numbers and not the "maximum free transfer" limits...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    2. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Verteiron · · Score: 4, Informative

      Okay, double posts are bad form, but I just saw the text underneath the pricing table: "Speed reduction once data usage reaches 150% of included data (to ensure your bill remains under control)".

      So in other words, if you pay for the 4Mb/s at about $80/month, you get 2000MB of free data transfer. So you download at full speed for a little over an hour. After that, every megabyte you download after that costs you a dime. Ouch. And I thought Mediacom had a racket running...

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    3. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 1

      When you are the only BPL provider in the world, I guess you can charge whatever you want.

      --
      VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    4. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      While I rarely agree with /. comments on usage caps, that is truly awful. The 256kb/s package, for example, would run out after 640 seconds, or around 10 minutes. The 4mb/s package would at least last you an hour, but that's still pretty ridiculous...

    5. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by tpgp · · Score: 1
      Those MB limits certainly are aweful.

      But it gets worse.

      whirlpool have this on their front page at the moment (also here

      From the article:

      The slowest plan is 256/64 and includes an astoundingly small 20MB of data

      *shivers* 20MB? Erk.

      Many other interesting facts in the article - including a link to ham radio users who've filed comlaints about interference.

      --
      My pics.
    6. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by andyrock · · Score: 0

      Not the only one...

      http://www.oni220.pt/oni220.htm

      UP/DOWN/Quota per month included

      2Mbps/1Mbps/4GB
      5Mbps/2Mbps/4GB

      21h to 9h downloads/uploads are free

    7. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by andyrock · · Score: 0

      that should be Down/up, of course ..

      Price:

      2Mbps 35Eur
      5Mbps 45Eur

    8. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by abaddon3k · · Score: 1

      Those are horrilbe bandwith caps. i could do that in a day with my torrents alone!!

    9. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in other words, if you pay for the 4Mb/s at about $80/month, you get 2000MB of free data transfer.

      2000 MB/month is 6.23 kbps.

      You're buying 4 Mbps peak, 6 kbps average.

      If you want to move a lot of bits, a good ol' 56K modem will beat this -- with one leg tied behind its back.

      I was going 70 miles an hour and got stopped by a cop who said, "Do you know the speed limit is 55 miles per hour?" "Yes, officer, but I wasn't going to be out that long..." -- Steven Wright

    10. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by lazybeam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Broadband in Australia is still expensive when you compare directly to other countries. This is the plan I'm on: http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc-isp.cfm?id=24&p=5574 and it is fairly good value. (Link is to Whirlpool/Broadband choice, which is a comprehensive listing of all broadband providers and plans in Australia.)

      It was only a few years ago Telstra/Bigpond had a full monopoly and charged around $80/m for 512kbps and 3GB/month, 15c/MB thereafter with no limit (reports of $2000+ bills being charged to single mothers). And they charged their wholesale customers the same or more for the same port, as well as being the major bandwidth provider. Telstra controlled 10/12 things an ISP needed.

      Now BP has less of a monopoly but all ADSL providers still have to deal with Telstra (either using T's DSLAM ports or paying lots to put their own DSLAM equipment into the exchanges).

      Rolling out an alternative network, either BPL or wireless, is the only way to cut Telstra out of the equation, but the startup costs are higher so prices are higher to get the return on investment.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    11. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they're not the only broadband provider in the world, and certainly not the only one in Tasmania - at those prices, they will only get the customers who can't get DSL and are desperate for speed, at all costs.

      --
      - Chuq
    12. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by AussieJimbo · · Score: 1
      Okay, double posts are bad form, but I just saw the text underneath the pricing table: "Speed reduction once data usage reaches 150% of included data (to ensure your bill remains under control)".

      So in other words, if you pay for the 4Mb/s at about $80/month, you get 2000MB of free data transfer. So you download at full speed for a little over an hour. After that, every megabyte you download after that costs you a dime.

      No, I'm pretty sure what they mean is that after your quote is exceeded you will continue to receive data at high speed and pay for it by the MB until you get to 150% of your quota when they will slow you down and continue to charge by the MB.

      They are only keeping your bill under control by slowing down your consumption of bandwidth after 150%, you are not getting anything for free.

      Broadband in Oz is a rip off.

    13. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by 6th+time+lucky · · Score: 1

      Broadband in Oz is a rip off.

      There are some, some, ISPs that do offer no excess services... iiNET give you around 2gb peak plus 2gb off peak (or more for more cash). When you hit the limit though your speeds drop from 8Mb to 56k! A couple of other providers Optus? iPrimus? drop you to 33k!!!

      So basically you get a great deal provided you arnt downloading a lot of high bandwith stuff (like movies you errr purchased) and then you are basically left to just checking your email for the rest of the month...

      However getting several GB of the latest ISOs requires some foresight (and with a rolling download window, not a monthly start fresh, its bloody hard)

    14. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to the state of broadband Internet in the South Pacific :)

    15. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

      ...but the data allowances are rather low.

      --
      Does it go on forever?
    16. Re:Those MB per month limits are awful by Dracophile · · Score: 1

      If you want reasonable-to-cheap broadband, you don't come to Australia for it.

      --
      Athy, athier, athiest.
  7. Home Plug? by MBCook · · Score: 1
    I thought that HomePlug was using your house's power wiring as a replacement for ethernet, not unlike HomePNA where you piggy back on your existing phone lines for the same purpose.

    Aren't HomePlug and BPL different, or have they merged, or what?

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:Home Plug? by fatboy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Homeplug is the consumer standard for in house data over powerlines.

      HomePlug is also the standard that Motorola is using for their low voltage Canopy system. It operates on the 110/220 side of the transformer, not one the medium voltage lines.

      Homeplug has actual hardware based filters to make sure it does not interfere with amateur radio operators. It does not merely change the modulation technique like most BPL providers have done to mitigate interference.

      --
      --fatboy
    2. Re:Home Plug? by Goody · · Score: 1

      Some BPL uses Homeplug chipsets and others use DS2. There's also some other proprietary systems. They currently don't talk with each other and your neighbor's Homeplug system could interfere with your BPL next door that is another system.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  8. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 2, Funny
    Deadly Spiders Deadly Snakes Deadly Sharks Deadly Maori

    Ah, who am I kidding - I would never leave the house with broadband that fast...

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
  9. I have cable / upload speed by RUFFyamahaRYDER · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have Comcast cable internet and I'm pretty happy with my download speeds. The thing that I wish they would allow for is higher upload speeds.

    So this new service offers 12Mbps download... but what are the upload speeds?

    1. Re:I have cable / upload speed by milesbparty · · Score: 1

      I have Comcast cable internet and I'm pretty happy with my download speeds.

      Things that suck about Comcast: No static IP, crappy TOS, stupid service reps.

      Comcast Service Rep: "Click Start, then go to Control Panel..."
      Me: "Umm, the connection goes from my cable modem, to my Linux box, which is my firewall."
      Comcast Service Rep: "I don't know nuthin' about no Linux box!" (This was an exact quote from a Comcast Service Rep...I kid you not).

      If I had a speedy alternative, I would definately switch from Comcast.

      --
      eMelody Web Directory add your site today!
    2. Re:I have cable / upload speed by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      The upload speeds that TasTel (the company that is currently doing this) depend on which "package" the user buys. Here's the relationship:

      256kb/64kb
      1Mb/256kb
      4Mb/1Mb

      So if the user chooses the 256kb down package, they get 64 kb up. There is also a 1Mb down/1Mb up package which is somewhat more expensive then their 1Mb/256Kb package.

      All these details and more can be found at their website: http://www.tastel.com.au/bpl/index.html

      --
      VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    3. Re:I have cable / upload speed by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      At least with a dynamic IP, you could always use the argument against the **AA of "You can't prove without a doubt that this particular IP was in my use at that time."

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    4. Re:I have cable / upload speed by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      No static IP, but mine hasn't changed in the 6 months I've had service. I know because I set up a VPN link tied to the IP and it hasn't gone dead yet.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    5. Re:I have cable / upload speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comcast has static IP. Otherwise, I would not have had any problems on Rapidshare! :(

    6. Re:I have cable / upload speed by Chop · · Score: 1

      Things that suck about Comcast: No static IP

      The last time my Comcast IP changed was when they completed the @home network cut-over...
       
      Chop

    7. Re:I have cable / upload speed by TooncesTheCat · · Score: 1

      I am on Charter High Speed here in North Carolina and happy with what I'm getting. 29.99 a month for 3mbps, but since I'm in a country bumpkin town the guy noticed no one was on my local node. So he decided he would be nice after I chitchatted him for a couple of minutes and showed him some badass websites / stuff to do and some new games since his son is a supposed gamer. He bumped me to 10mbps and I could have never been happier.

    8. Re:I have cable / upload speed by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      They'll give you a static if you give them cash... It'll still be blacklisted by every RBL in existance as part of the comcast IP block though.

      They don't enforce the TOS unless you're costing them money... Plus if you pay for the static IP, the TOS becomes much friendlier.

      As for your customer service experience there... The proper response to "Click Start, then..." is "Ok." After you get through all that you say "That still didn't work," and then they fix your problem. You better be triple certain the problem isn't on your end before you do that though.

    9. Re:I have cable / upload speed by webcrawler · · Score: 1

      If you're complaining about cable, I have Verizon DSL which is actually 864 kbps down and 160 kbps up due to my geophysical location compared to their office. I've yet to see my bandwidth go up since I saw those 3 mbps ads...

    10. Re:I have cable / upload speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lucky
      shit

  10. Sad... by coop0030 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Powerline broadband has received wide support from leading vendors including Intel, Motorola and Cisco Systems


    It's kind of sad that these companies have so little respect for the Ham Radio operators.

    With all of the evidence showing the damage that the broadband over powerlines causes, this is kind of sad...
    1. Re:Sad... by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You'd think all the communication problems post-Katrina would have taught people something too. I've heard all sorts of stories of people not being able to communicate, police walkie-talkies being useless after a few hours when the battery dies, etc. Considering hams that prepare for this kind of thing know what they're doing and are supposed to prepare and be ready for having no electricity and such.

      This was a big PR chance. I heard in some areas the ONLY way to get messages passed (especially "Is my brother OK" type Health & Welfare traffic) was by hams.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Sad... by doombob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly. Look at what the Wireless Institute of Australia has to say about some of this: Official complains and primers on interference.

    3. Re:Sad... by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      Can you provide a little more information about this interference? How large of a radius around a broadband-carrying line is affected, severity, etc?

    4. Re:Sad... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well a Ham in the area has already sent in a complaint. Claims S9 interference on the 80 meter band. Pretty much blanked out HF for him.
      I am all for broadband but giving up HF radio seems like a bad plan.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And when the power is out, so is the broadband... Now again what was the problem?

    6. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it's really needed, the power will be out so there won't be any interference anyways.

    7. Re:Sad... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I don't know just how knuckle-headed someone can be. HAM operators still have to test and maintain equipment, and that might be awfully hard to pull off when there's substantial amounts of interference. What do you think, that radio equipment is magical and just works?

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    8. Re:Sad... by coop0030 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who will want to keep their Ham systems operational when they can't use it except when the power is out?

    9. Re:Sad... by coop0030 · · Score: 1

      In the same respect: If you were never able to use your computer, except when the power was off (I know, sounds ridiculous, but so does the parent); would you even bother to keep it up and running in case of emergencies?

      You are very short-sighted.

    10. Re:Sad... by arturov · · Score: 1

      Not even Katrina knocked out power over the entire country. What good is HF if you can only communicate within the region that has been affected?

    11. Re:Sad... by psavo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought you guys were keen on challenges like this? Like bouncing signal off the Jupiter or finding correct frequency for auntie Tilly's golden teeth or something..

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    12. Re:Sad... by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When the hurricanes hit last year (direct hits by three of them over about a months time) we found that cell phones failed almost immediately then a few hours after the power went out the land lines failed, their battery backups exhausted.

      We were without power for about a week. During that time the only communications we had were one channel that came in over the rabbit ears on the TV or the radio. The generator and transfer switch I had was able to power much of the house (no A/C) but the cable service and cable modem where down.

      Personally I think having separate infrastructure for various services would be better. Using the power grid for not only power but communications puts a lot of things in one basket. One failure ala the L.A. outage yesterday would cut power as well as other communications. With the trend toward voice over IP/broadband if the power goes out you would lose telephone type services as well.

      Currently if the power goes out land line phones will continue to work, assuming you have a phone that does not require power :)
      Bundling data and phone services with power should also come with a much more resiliant infrastructure where a cable cut (L.A.) does not plunge millions into the dark.

    13. Re:Sad... by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a Ham and have been keeping up with the test results through QST, a magazine put out to members of the Amateur Radio Relay League (ARRL). The ARRL web site has probably all the info you would want at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/.

      I've tried to be objective about the technology, but especially when I see videos of Hams driving around their neighborhoods with an HF rig dialing through the spectrum and hearing nothing but hum from the power lines transfering BPL signals, I can't say I'm very optomistic.

      It's also appaling how the FCC has championed this and practically refused to demand BPL trials be shut down when complaints of interference have been filed (and probably every trial has had complaints).

      But just think about it. What are antennas but unsheilded wires with a modulated electric current applied to them. That's exactly what BPL is, one giant antenna. How could it not cause interference?

    14. Re:Sad... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's physics. Power lines are big monsterous antennas and there's no getting around it. Why should power companies get to puke RF into unlicensed bands? It's their problem to solve, not the problem of people who use bands that are going to get squashed.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    15. Re:Sad... by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      It's kind of sad that these companies have so little respect for the Ham Radio operators.

      This is an article from the ARRL webpage discussing some work with Motorola at W1AW:

      BPL at HQ: ARRL Cooperating in BPL System Experiment
      http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2005/08/29/1/?nc= 1

      I don't know what the other BPL developers are doing, btw.

      Please cut the whining folks, and read up. I thought that hams were a bit more resiliant than this.

            -Pete Lee
              K7LEE

    16. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I don't know, maybe communicating with areas that aren't affected by the disaster so you can get help?

      Why don't you think about your own question for four seconds rather than leaving the thinking to others?

    17. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're in yout 40s and living in your parents' basement you'll takes your chances to complain as they come.

    18. Re:Sad... by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the post. That's about the only optomistic news I've heard so far. Hopefully it will make it into the next issue of QST.

      That said, I'm not sure what you consider "whining"; but I think it's perfectly valid for people to be apprehensive about this. I'm not surprised that a radio manufacturer is interested in mitigating interference. It's the power companies and government that have been over eager to deploy systems without much regard for testing. If this sort of cooperative effort had been initiated between the ARRL, the FCC, and the power companies from the get go then I think there wouldn't be such a negative bias towards the technology.

    19. Re:Sad... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "When the hurricanes hit last year (direct hits by three of them over about a months time) we found that cell phones failed almost immediately"

      Where do you live? I live in Orlando, where there were two direct hits (I know of no place in the state that receieved three, but maybe you're talking about another state).

      Also, MY cellphone worked flawlessly during the storms, and after, with the only caveat being that they were so BUSY, it was sometimes difficult to get calls through.

      The landlines and my friends house (where I satyed while my apartment got whacked) never went out. They were also without power for a week, but the phone worked the whole time.

      In short, I don't think you're accurately representing what happened, at least where I live.

    20. Re:Sad... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      The number BPL customers far exceeds that of Ham Radio operaters and produces a whole hell of a lot more cash. Little guy always gets squashed.

      "But we need hams in emergancies!" I'll use my cell phone, thanks.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    21. Re:Sad... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      This is HOMEPLUG, not BPL. If you're unwilling (or unable) to acknowledge the difference, you shouldn't be discussing the subject.

      In case you were unaware,

      http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/files/HomePl ug_ARRL_Dec_2000.pdf

      Notice the conclsuion. Then try to continue complaining about interference (which if you don't want to read the pdf, is described by the ARRL as "barely perceptable" with moderate separation of the antenna and homeplug equipment. Moderate separation is described in one place as 60 feet.

      Homeplug is working with HAMS. Stop bellyaching about something you haven't bothered to research.

    22. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>"But we need hams in emergancies!" I'll use my cell phone, thanks.

      The first thing to stop working in any sort of major event is the cellphone network. If not from destruction of the towers/wires themselves, then from the extreme congestion/overloading as everyone who thinks as you do reach for their phones.

    23. Re:Sad... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      Yessirreee! And just how well did cell phones work out for the people in Louisiana and Mississippi?

    24. Re:Sad... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      It seems to me that he was recounting his experience, not yours. Maybe your nearest cell tower didn't get knocked out; his did.

      In planning for emergencies, you have to plan for the worst case, not the typical case (and I don't know if your experience, or his, was typical).

    25. Re:Sad... by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Most of SoCal's power woes have to do with big, long range transmission lines going down. The service offered here is a last-mile connection over rural power lines. If someone knocks the pole over and takes out the power, the phone and cable were on that pole too.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    26. Re:Sad... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      Sorry... did you read the article from ZDNet-Australia? Did you see the term HomePlug used anywhere in the article? I didn't think so.

      The only mention of HomePlug was in the Slashdot teaser. The article is about BPL, Broadband Over Powerline, not about using house wiring for a LAN.

    27. Re:Sad... by Woody77 · · Score: 1

      You can use your cellphone. Those tryiing to actually run the emergency services would appreciate the ability to communicate outside of the area, though. And HF radio is MUCH more reliable than cell, and people can talk from different states, which is really key to a situation like Katrina.

      Network communications can actually be located in TX, AL, AR, etc, or based out in the Gulf on a boat, and easily contact people with stations setup in NOLA on generator/battery power.

    28. Re:Sad... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      And just how well did cell phones work out for the people in Louisiana and Mississippi?

      According to reports from CNN, "It's spotty at best," said Josh Britton, a student at Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge. With cell phones, "a lot of times you'll have to try for several minutes to make an outgoing call

      Also, it says: Residents reported trouble making and receiving calls throughout the day, and many turned to the Internet and text messaging to try and reach relatives and friends.

      Hmmm..Sounds like my cell phone would still be able to txt my family and that BPL would have been put to good use by "many".

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    29. Re:Sad... by slashname3 · · Score: 1

      I am here in Orlando just north of the airport. Charlie came through and tore our part of town up pretty bad. Then we had Frances come through followed by Jeanne (sp?). The fourth one to hit the state that year ran up the west coast and nailed the panhandle so we did not get anything from that one.

      I know my sister on the other side of Orlando near Universal never lost power and did not have the losses we had. So some areas were spared while others were hit harder. I lost two major trees in the back yard, one maple tree and the other an oak tree. Luckly when the tops were ripped out of them they fell into the conservation area behind the house and not on the house. Did have one large branch that hit the patio but no damage from that.

      All in all we were very lucky. Most of the houses in my neighborhood had serious roof damage. I only lost a few tabs. The store up on Curry Ford had its entire roof and facade ripped off during the storm. They are just now getting it rebuilt.

      Lots of trees in this area were knocked down which probably took the power/phone/cable services with it.

      The first hurricane, charlie, was the worst. The other two did not cause near the damage, at least in our area of town. But we still lost power for a day or two on those.

      One thing I learned was that I had things pretty much set to ride out the storms here and the weeks that followed. However, after watching the Katrina results I realized that I did not have a good plan for full evacuation either prior or after the storms go through. I am starting to plan for that now. :)

    30. Re:Sad... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
      If you were in Baton Rouge, like Josh Britton.

      What about if you were in New Orleans?

    31. Re:Sad... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      The first thing to stop working in any sort of major event is the cellphone network. If not from destruction of the towers/wires themselves, then from the extreme congestion/overloading as everyone who thinks as you do reach for their phones.
      If a cell tower is destroyed.. HAM antenna will be gone too. (Cell network survived Katrina, btw) As far as conjestion... Which would you rather do..A) Hit re-dial 100 times and talk to your loved one or B) wander around looking for a HAM operator then likely wait your turn in a line of hundreds of people to relay messages to another HAM operator. You might as well be tapping out morse code.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    32. Re:Sad... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yea I heard that. Nasty to say the least. If they can not fix it then it should not be used.
      I am not a HAM but I do live in an area that gets hurricans. We could not contact my father after Jean hit near his home. Since he is not in ideal health we where worried. A HAM got in touch with the local Red Cross and checked on him. He was fine thank goodness.
      After a hurricane
      1. Cell phones do not work.
      2. Land Lines do not work.
      3. DSL does not work.
      4. Cable modems do not work.
      HAM radio still works.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:Sad... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      And HF radio is MUCH more reliable than cell, and people can talk from different states, which is really key to a situation like Katrina.

      1) I'd rather have a shotty cell phone call to speak with family directly than relay messages to a ham operator who relays it to another opertor who relays it to a call center, who calls my family who has no way to get back in touch with me.

      2) Cells can reach people out of state too.. So.. I'm confused why you even mentioned that?

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    34. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>If a cell tower is destroyed.. HAM antenna will be gone too.

      Not relevant. Many Hams practice every summer for just such emergencies - part of the preparation is to be able to set up temporary wire antennae. Indeed, some portable gear with base loaded whips aren't out in the weather.

      >>(Cell network survived Katrina, btw)

      Not according to the news reports I heard. I heard that the cellphone network was knocked out of commission for a number of days. In fact, one reporter (talking to CNN's Christianne Amanpour (sp?)) was complaining of such. Such outages are normal after major events such as this.

      >>A) Hit re-dial 100 times and talk to your loved one

      OK, I know this might come across as ad-hominem but I don't mean it as such. Your 'A)' above shows clearly that you are ignorant of the complexities of congestion and how it brings the networks to their knees. No-one gets through. And this doesn't even include occasions where the government deliberately shuts off private citizen access (as happened after the tube bombings in London).

    35. Re:Sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "1) I'd rather have a shotty cell phone call to speak with family directly..."

      You don't have that choice - at least in many of the disasters that have occurred since cellphone networks have existed.

      "2) Cells can reach people out of state too..."

      Uh, not if the local towers are not functional they don't.

      Ham radio doesn't use infrastructure (assuming battery power of course). Cellphones just have not worked out in emergencies like this.

    36. Re:Sad... by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Why should power companies get to puke RF into unlicensed bands?

      This should be good for a troll mod, but here goes: How about because they're unlicensed bands?

      It seems to me that if you're listing who can and can't use a band and for what purpose and to what degree, you're pretty well licensing it--even if the license costs nothing.

      In that sense, assuming there is no technical (not moral, technical!) flaw in the reasoning... it IS the problem of the people who use bands that are going to get squashed.

    37. Re:Sad... by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 1

      1) Ok, so don't. Hams are usually in an emergency traffic only mode anyway until regular communications are restored. But if they were relaying personal messages, it would be totally up to you whether to bother communicating at all to your family.

      2) I think his point is that you don't need local relay towers to establish communications between the entire country. It's a reliability statement. In addition to cell towers, there has to be a direct link from the tower to the phone system. Ham radio has neither of those limitations.

    38. Re:Sad... by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 1

      Sure, those big house-mounted antennas may be knocked out, but Hams are pretty good at improvising. There are also Hams that train for this sort of thing and have portable equipement that can be setup in minutes. Also, every year we have something called Field Day which is all about practicing our skiils of operating without prior infrastructure. I doubt the cell company does that.

    39. Re:Sad... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      This should be good for a troll mod, but here goes: How about because they're unlicensed bands?

      The OP was referring to bands for which the powerline folks do not have an FCC-issued licence specifically for that region, not bands which are free from regulation. Since the amateur radio bands are strictly controlled and one must go through the trouble of passing an examination and getting a licence to use them, it would be inappropriate for broadband-over-powerline to spew crap all over a section of the spectrum over which they have no qualifications.

    40. Re:Sad... by CRCulver · · Score: 1

      The power might be out in the disaster area, but it will still be on in other parts of the country, meaning people in the disaster zone will not be able to use amateur radio to relay messages such as "I'm okay" or "we need supplies" to people in other cities. Amateur radio communication everywhere could be affected.

    41. Re:Sad... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Hams are usually in an emergency traffic only mode anyway until regular communications are restored.

      Uhm. No. And why did you feel the urge to post something which is such a blatant falsehood? Yes, a Ham operator will yield their frequency to an emergency communication but the fact is that most of the traffic both in and out of a disaster zone is "Health And Welfare" traffic: "Bob Bozo says call 111-555-1212 tell his grandma he and the kids are doing OK at the superdome"...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    42. Re:Sad... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm not interested in ham radio. This broadband over power is a fantastic idea. Huge speeds as well. Which do you think more people have a use for, fast Internet access, or talking to people over radio waves? I don't know why people still use ham radios with mobile phones about.

      "Oh but what about in an emergency..." Sorry but I don't live in a place that's below sea level, or on a fault, or in a hurricane zone. In any case, if a whole area is trashed the power will be out anyway, so your radios will work.

    43. Re:Sad... by ifwm · · Score: 1

      "The only mention of HomePlug was in the Slashdot teaser. The article is about BPL, Broadband Over Powerline, not about using house wiring for a LAN."

      This proves you don't know what you're talkinga about. HomePlug is a special BPL implementation that uses filters to help deal with interference.

      You condecension would be less moronic if you had bothered to do your research before opening your mouth.

    44. Re:Sad... by bmalia · · Score: 1

      It's a reliability statement. In addition to cell towers, there has to be a direct link from the tower to the phone system. Ham radio has neither of those limitations

      Guess we'll see how reliale the HAM network is after BPL becomes mainstream. ;)

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    45. Re:Sad... by MuffinSpawn · · Score: 1

      'Cause I'm an idiot? I was extrapolating from my experience with tornados and assumed that Hams would be helping with emergency communications, asking that personal traffic be postponed. Sorry, I shouldn't have said that with such authority. I was more concerned with my real point that one doesn't have to use the only communication method available if he or she doesn't want to. But hey, thanks for being so hostile about correcting me.

    46. Re:Sad... by Da_Biz · · Score: 1

      That said, I'm not sure what you consider "whining"; but I think it's perfectly valid for people to be apprehensive about this.

      I completely agree--I'm 100% behind protecting the valuable resources that amateur radio operators (encouraging interest in science, ARES, etc.).

      At the same time, I wish hams would pay a bit more attention to developments in the field of BPL, instead of repeating the same old gripes. That article I originally included was from August of this year.

    47. Re:Sad... by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      If a cell tower is destroyed.. HAM antenna will be gone too.

      Er. And it takes all of 5 minutes to take the roll-up jpole out of the emergency pack and hang it from something. But of course you knew that. (Cell network survived Katrina, btw)

      In some places. For a while. But those batteries running the tower are going to drain and the generator-backed towers are going to run out of fuel, and the network will already be degraded from the towers that didn't survive and the remaining towers are going to be overloaded.

      Amateur radio uses a lot less power can be powered off a car battery which, worst case, can be conveniently looted from any abandoned vehicle, charged off of any car you can hotwire, ...

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  11. Grr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    After I spent all this time getting off-grid!

  12. power outages by lonasindi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but even with a UPS, you'll no longer be able to surf the 'net if the power grid goes down. The data signal is going through all the same places as the regular power.

    A small price to pay though, does anyone know the maximum range on this technology?

    1. Re:power outages by jupiter909 · · Score: 1

      When powerlines go down, it means the power feeds are not passing through. The lines are still connected though.

    2. Re:power outages by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I have cable right now, and wouldn't be able to surf if the power went out (even though I have a laptop). Wireless (not 11b, WiMax type) is the only way you can do that, and that assumes that the wireless device (repeater, router, whatever you want to call it) that your computer would connect to still has power (or has a backup).

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:power outages by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      A DSL modem runs over the phone lines, which are independent of the power grid. If you have power to your DSL modem and the outage is relatively local, so the end of your DSL line still has power, there'll be surfin' away. Dialup is also an option.

    4. Re:power outages by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Er, so what? Your UPS won't help if the Telco goes down (DSL), or Cableco (cabelmodem). You can't surf the net if your provider is down, no matter who it is.

      If anything, this saves you the cost of a UPS :)

    5. Re:power outages by lonasindi · · Score: 1

      furhter in this thread there's a comment about locality. mostly that's just the primary downside I see to the consumer with this technology.
      though, does it suffer the same bandwidth sharing as cable? Where everyone in a neighborhood is sharing a line, and if one guy's using 2mb, everyone else is crippled?

  13. Misleading headline by Brunellus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    c'mon, guys. Is it asking too much to report the ACTUAL bandwidth used in the trial, instead of some arbitrarily-high number that the users involved will never actually see??

  14. Just makes sense by Joe+Random · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Broadband over powerlines makes a whole lot of sense. Currently if you want broadband you have to run cable from your local cable provider, phone line from your local phone company, optical fiber from . . . whoever might offer that service (not an option in most areas, including my own, so I'm not sure), or you'll have to set up a satellite dish and worry about weather effects.

    But what's the one thing that all computers have in common? They use electricity! And even if you're generating your own, you're still likely hooked up to the grid so that you can sell your excess back.

    I can definitely see broadband over power lines being a big hit in developing countries, since they won't have to worry about the added infrastructure for connecting their residents to the Internet. Add voice over IP and you end up with VOIPOPL: Three products for the price of one (give or take a bit of added overhead).

    1. Re:Just makes sense by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Too bad it's going to knock out so many communications bands, and that it's going to require major rejigging of power lines, and leaves open the question as to why power companies just don't sling fiber on their poles.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Just makes sense by coop0030 · · Score: 1

      The question remains though...What is the range on these systems?

      Powerlines where never designed with having broadband traffic travel through them. They are highly inefficient.

      By the time the signals get to your house in the boondocks the signal must have degraded significantly.

      Once again, Powerlines were never, ever designed with this use in mind. They are terribly inefficient.

    3. Re:Just makes sense by bmo · · Score: 1

      "Broadband over powerlines makes a whole lot of sense."

      It only makes sense when considered in a vacuum.

      Peaceful coexistence with radio frequencies, however, has yet to be demonstrated.

      Consider that you've got RF being transmitted up and down _unshielded_ power lines. Can you say "leakage"? I knew you could. As it stands, the US FCC makes cable TV and broadband providers shit their pants when it comes to leakage, because a certain amount of funding for the FCC comes from fines, and they're not afraid to level them.

      Broadband operators are _not_ licensed for broadcast, and when it comes to Licensed vs Unlicensed, Licensed Wins Every Time. Either you fix your leaks or pay a ton of fines and get shut down. It's as simple as that.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:Just makes sense by Ice+Station+Zebra · · Score: 1

      BPL makes about as much sense as two tin cans and a string. It isn't scalable, causes and receives interference to licensed radio spectrum users, requires additional infrastructure placed at intervals along the power lines, unsecure (steal a box off the power lines reverse engineer and sniff the data anytime anywhere). BPL's only goal is to make $$$ for a provider that pretty much as a fixed audience with little room for growth. Do you really want the local electric company as your ISP?

    5. Re:Just makes sense by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Powerlines where never designed with having broadband traffic travel through them. They are highly inefficient.

      True. However, DSL seems to work pretty well even if the phone lines it uses were designed for something like 4 kHz of voice bandwidth.

      Of all the non-data cables leading to households, TV cable is the only one that was actually designed for high bandwidth. Pity that the way it is deployed makes it usually worse than DSL.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:Just makes sense by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Um if you think the FCC is not going to change the rules to allow BPL to emit interference then you are mistaken. There's too much money involved to prevent BPL from proceeding.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    7. Re:Just makes sense by AlanS2002 · · Score: 0

      I imagine it would be cheaper to rejig the power lines than to ad an fiber line to ever power line in existence. The interference thingy might stop it from happening though.

      --
      Not all conservatives are stupid,
      but it is true that most stupid people are conservative.
      - Hume
    8. Re:Just makes sense by ifwm · · Score: 1, Informative

      http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/files/HomePl ug_ARRL_Dec_2000.pdf

      Could you please read this, then shut up.

      Thanks.

    9. Re:Just makes sense by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly fine for underground power lines - Oh, yeah, the US is a bit backwards - sorry...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    10. Re:Just makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some power companies, like FPL, already tread this path.

    11. Re:Just makes sense by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

      ... why power companies just don't sling fiber on their poles.

      Despite the bandwidth, I don't think you can actually get a lot of power through a FO.

    12. Re:Just makes sense by bmo · · Score: 1

      " Um if you think the FCC is not going to change the rules to allow BPL to emit interference then you are mistaken. There's too much money involved to prevent BPL from proceeding."

      Um, if you think that the FCC is going to open THAT can of worms, then you are very much mistaken. If they have to make an exception for BPL, then the cable companies and _everyone else_ will be clamoring for "fair treatment". No. Hell will freeze over before an exception is made for BPL. You want chaos? That will get you chaos, hounds of chaos, and the Mother In Law of Chaos.

      --
      BMO

  15. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, you no longer have to worry about such predators as the Tasmanian Tiger

  16. Ham radio? by leather_helmet · · Score: 0

    last line of communication over relatively large distances will be threatened... on the flipside, if everything does hit the shits, due to some type of disaster, all the powerlines down etc., the frequencies will be back online/usable...right?

    1. Re:Ham radio? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps you could explain how precisely equipment is going to be tested when pr0n-over-power-lines is making spaghetti of the frequencies.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Ham radio? by RokaMoka · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sadly no. If I'm in California, and I'm talking to a flood victim in New Orleans, the BPL in Arizona will block us. The thing people forget about HAM radio is it is single transmitter, around the world. That can ONLY happen when everyone plays very nice. BPL does not place nice.

    3. Re:Ham radio? by Rickler · · Score: 1
      --

      The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
    4. Re:Ham radio? by techiemac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It should also be noted that currently Ham Radio has currently shown itself to be the only reliable form of communications in New Orleans. People who say that Ham Radio is dead need to understand that it is not dead, it's currently evolving and still provides an essential service from providing early warning on severe weather incidents (skywarn) to disaster recovery to simply talking to interesting people. Cell phones simply do not provide adequate coverage and reliablity during emergency situations.
      It currently is also evolving within the digital realm to provide everything from high speed data over the air (HSMM working group in the ARRL) to VoIP interconnects between repeaters over the Internet.
      Hopefully something can be reached that provides for a BPL system that does not cause interferenece with Ham Radio (this system might... didn't read the spec). If it does, I would rather have Ham Radio over BPL simply because it really doesn't bring very much to the table.

    5. Re:Ham Radio? by n6kuy · · Score: 1

      Heh. According to the chart on that PDF, they have the Ham bands notched out. Good!
      But what about the rest of the HF spectrum? There are other users of HF radio besides Hams....

      Also, I'd be worried that hams and other HF users would be causing interference to the BPL.

      I just don't see how BPL can ever be workable.

      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
    6. Re:Ham Radio? by ifwm · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the conclusion.

  17. Paranoia alert... by zen611 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, any outlet could be an internet connection? I envision web cams and microphones left in every room by your crazy ex-girlfreind... Kind of expensive to have to replace all appliances, electronics, and outlets after an ugly breakup.

    1. Re:Paranoia alert... by Brunellus · · Score: 1

      alternatively, imagine leaving webcams and microphones in every room for your ex-girlfriend.....

    2. Re:Paranoia alert... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is your father. We need to talk a bit about who you're dating these days. I'm concerned.

    3. Re:Paranoia alert... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, if I had a GF capable of accomplishing such a feat, she would not be an ex, thats for sure. That'd be a keeper right there!

    4. Re:Paranoia alert... by CookieJago74 · · Score: 0

      Slashdotters are, however, unlikely to have girlfriends in the first place. Having said that, a girlfriend of a slashdotter would become 'ex' quite quickly, so your theory works.

    5. Re:Paranoia alert... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unplug all your appliances, apply power surge, problem solved.

  18. I have only one name to all this by McNihil · · Score: 0

    "Sky-Net"

    Be afraid... very afraid.

    1. Re:I have only one name to all this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this goes over wires, not through the sky. And Skynet was a computer AI, not an internet service provider. You fail it.

  19. Whirlpool.net.au by Buzzard2501 · · Score: 1
    More information here http://www.whirlpool.net.au/, of particular interest:
    The slowest plan is 256/64 and includes an astoundingly small 20MB of data, which includes uploads.
    --
    Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
  20. 400 Mbps! by op12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article alludes several times to the higher possible speeds:

    According to Ehrenfeld, the BPL service will be capable of providing an Internet connection for homes and businesses that is "vastly quicker" than the 24Mbps maximum possible with ADSL2+ technology, which uses analogue telephone lines. Such speeds are so far only being offered by only a couple of ISPs, with several more offering speeds up to 12Mbps.

    But what really caught my eye:

    "engin and Mitsubishi Electric engineers have worked closely together in both Australia and Japan to incorporate engin's VoIP technology in the 200Mbps BPL product developed by Mitsubishi," said a statement from the VoIP vendor on the trial.

    1. Re:400 Mbps! by op12 · · Score: 1

      Oops, obviously I meant for the title to be 200Mbps and not 400.

    2. Re:400 Mbps! by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Well, then what good is it? Get my hopes up for that and then dash them because of a typo? Just how cruel can one be?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:400 Mbps! by op12 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 400Mbps would have been amazing, but that 200Mbps is peanuts compared to the speeds available now...

      At least I didn't accidentally include an extra zero :)

  21. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by tpgp · · Score: 1

    Bah!

    1) Spiders, snakes are rare in Tasmania.
    2) In Tas, the water is to cold to swim in (hence sharks are no problem)
    3) Maoris are only deadly if you don't know they're from New Zealand, not Australia.

    --
    My pics.
  22. uploads: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.tastel.com.au/bpl/price_broadband.html

    256kb/64kb
    1Mb/256kb
    1Mb/1Mb
    4Mb/1Mb

    Comcast's maximum upload is 768 Kb. If youre not paying for the "speed" its significantly less.

  23. Clarification of 'tiny' by Mindwarp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The tiny state of Tasmania

    Just to give some idea of what 'tiny' is in this context, Tasmania is about half way between West Virginia and South Carolina in terms of area.

    --
    The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    1. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by tpgp · · Score: 1

      Tasmania is looked upon as geographically small by the rest of Australia - Australia is roughly the same size as the US (without Alaska) - but only divided into seven states (or territories).

      Tasmania is by far the smallest state - it is four times smaller then the second smallest state (Victoria) and forty times smaller then the largest (Western Australia)

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and 50% of the population have a built-in map.

    3. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this clarifying? I can picture the size of Tasmania (very noticeable on any world Atlas) even though I don't live anywhere near Australia, but what the freaking size are West Virginia and South Carolina? Which one is bigger? What percentage of the landmass of Tasmania do they represent? Why did I need their size clarified to begin with? I thought we were talking about Tazmania which unlike these othere 2 places is a proper territorial reference gauge.

    4. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I travelled extensively around the US years ago and at one point I was in Houston, Texas.

      I was having a few drinks in a Saloon and they (of course...) were telling me about how large Texas is. I told them that the state I am from (Western Australia) is about three times the size of Texas.

      They point blank called me a liar!

      Stupid Texans...

    5. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by TheOriginalRevdoc · · Score: 1

      Maybe they mean "tiny" as in "insignificant". After all, the entire state has a population of less than 500,000, almost half of whom live in one city - Hobart. Most of the island is very, very empty.

      Come to think of it, powerline internet delivery makes no sense at all for Hobart. The city is very small and compact, making it ideal for wireless.

    6. Re:Clarification of 'tiny' by Chuq · · Score: 1
      --
      - Chuq
  24. Where is the plug for this thing? by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can hear them now...
    How do I plug in my Powerline BroadBand? Can I surf the web with my monitor? Can this thing run on batteries?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:Where is the plug for this thing? by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  25. Tiny? by gonerill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The tiny state of Tasmania Tasmania is about 68,000 sq km in area, which makes it bigger than West Virginia, Massachussetts, etc. Would you write "The tiny state of New Jersey"?

    1. Re:Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Yes.

    2. Re:Tiny? by Politburo · · Score: 1

      It's all relative. In Australia, Tasmania is considered tiny. In the US, Rhode Island and Hawaii are tiny.

    3. Re:Tiny? by donscarletti · · Score: 1
      It is tiny, one can cross it north to south in 6 hours or so, even dispite its frankly disgraceful road system.

      It is a very nice place though. I'd advise anyone reading this to check it out if they ever feel like seeing Australia. Most tourists like to see stuff like wallabies, koalas, tassie devels and wambats and Tasmania is a great place to see them. Cradle mountain is an especially beautiful place to visit, though it's a little cold.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    4. Re:Tiny? by gonerill · · Score: 1

      In Australia, Tasmania is considered tiny. Maybe. I'd say the ACT (where Canberra is located) is tiny. Tasmania is just small.

    5. Re:Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you write "The tiny state of New Jersey"?

      Yes.

    6. Re:Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Texas. You're all tiny to us. (Except Alaska)

    7. Re:Tiny? by Zey · · Score: 3, Funny
      I live in Texas. You're all tiny to us.

      Comparing State size, eh?

      Texas, USA: 678,907 km^2
      Western Australia, Australia: 2,529,875 km^2

      Things are always teensy-weensy in Texas.

    8. Re:Tiny? by Chuq · · Score: 1

      North to south is more like 3 hours, than 6.

      Going from the extreme northwest tip, to a peninsula in the southeast might take you 6 hours, if you are trying - but most of the population (spread over the south, north east, and north west) is within three hours of each other.

      --
      - Chuq
    9. Re:Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except the ACT isn't a state.

    10. Re:Tiny? by Kadmos · · Score: 1

      The tiny state of Tasmania Tasmania is about 68,000 sq km in area, which makes it bigger than West Virginia, Massachussetts, etc. Would you write "The tiny state of New Jersey"?

      Maybe :-) The largest cattle station is Australia is approx 38,000km^2. That makes it bigger than (the USA's) Indiana, Maine, South Carolina, West Virginia, Maryland, others and Belgium.

      AFAIK the largest ever area of land owned by one person in Australia was Sir Sydney Kidman who owned approx 6% or just under 460,000 km^2, (larger than all the US states except Alaska).

    11. Re:Tiny? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe not tiny in land area, but tiny in population.

      Population densities (people per square km), according to Wikipedia...

      Tasmania: 7/km
      New Jersey: 438/km

    12. Re:Tiny? by harmic · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they mean tiny when compared to the not so tiny state of West Australia (2,529,875 sq. km - nearly a third of the size of the US).

  26. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by asac · · Score: 2, Informative

    Come to Hamburg, Germany .... here you can get a 25 MBit/s DSL line for 28,99 EUR + 29,95 EUR if you want all this flat.

    In addition, you have none of the above bads and no hurricanes, earthquakes et al. Maybe the weather is bad, but who cares if you have that much bandwidth.

  27. Radio Frequency interference by kb1cvh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Will this deployment of Broadband over Powerline cause interference to radio services and be subject to interference from radio services ?

    The American Radio Relay league has information on BPL in the USA at

    http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/

    The Australian Government has information on BPL at

    http://www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.2490560:STANDARD: 2099729486:pc=PC_2845

    --
    Peter AI6PG
  28. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is Australia, where are the crocs on your list?

    Think about the only two Australian celebrity exports - Mick Dundee and Steve Irwin. See what I'm getting at?

    Seriously, have cheesy 80s movies taught you NOTHING about the deadliness of crocodiles?! ;)

    --
    Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  29. Can't Wait by ultrafastneal · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait until the day comes when I can send someone an instant electric shock through the internet.

  30. Its all relative baby! by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 0

    Compared to the rest of Australia, Tasmania is tiny. Yes, you would say the tiny state of Rhode Island if you talking about states in the US, even though the Vatical City is smaller.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  31. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    Yes, there are quite a few Maori in Australia, but they come from New Zealand and you'd find a hell of a lot more there (though less snakes and spiders).

    Secondly, if saying Maoris are a reason not to move to a country isn't racist, I'm not sure what is.

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  32. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by asac · · Score: 1

    Ah, and I nearly forgot: Starting from Oct 2005 you can get a 18 MBit/s flat incl. telephone line for 49,90 EUR.

    Though, the 25MBit mentioned in my post above is a trial, this one is RETAIL! You can get it in 14 cities of germany ... so move.

    p.s. sorry for the german links. Maybe try babel or google translation to get a clue.

  33. BPL plays hell with radio. by Nethead · · Score: 5, Informative
    Many, if not all, of the BPL designs that have been deployed to date suffer from a number of technological weaknesses. Perhaps the most critical of these is that BPL is seriously degraded by nearby transmissions from low-powered transmitters from sources like Amateur Radio or CB. In several BPL cities, amateurs have done experimentation that shows that as little as 5 watts of power from a nearby radio transmitter can seriously degrade the performance of BPL. In some cases, the interference logged off a BPL user, requiring a reconnection to the network.

    This fatal flaw will seriously limit the way that BPL can be deployed and will decrease the reliability of a BPL system in any area where it is possible that nearby radio transmitters could be operating. Under the FCC's rules, BPL is an unlicensed device that must accept any interference caused to it by authorized radio services. In the past, and through decades of experience, such interference is rare to other broadband services, such as DSL, cable or satellite. However, in all of the BPL areas tested for susceptibility so far, the unshielded wiring that is used by BPL apparently picks up nearby radio transmitters and overload or otherwise degraded the performance of the system. Although this has been seen at power levels as low as 5 watts from Amateur Radio transmitters, Amateur Radio transmitters can use as much as 1500 watts of power, greatly extending area over which BPL will be unable to tune out these over-the-air signals.

    See the ARRL.org website for more info. http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/ 73 de W7COM

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      So...

      Combining the two sides that have been presented, BPL breaks amateur radio, but amateur radio breaks BPL back?

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    2. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it were easy to do BPL I suppose it would have been done already. It seems that HAM operators would settle down and the system would actually work in the wires were shielded. Our whole industrialized society has evolved with a constant 60Hz in the background so everything is already adapted to it and why would you need shielding? You wouldn't. But if we want to start modifying the signal coming from these lines then they'll need to be shielded.

      Anyone know exactly the type of wiring used for power lines as compared to lines that carry DSL or cable signals?

    3. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by Nethead · · Score: 1

      and you thought that stereo wars in the dorm rooms were bad... just wait.

      w7com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by klept · · Score: 1

      Did you get all the data / info on this flaw from ARRl sources, or from others. If from others, could you please tell me who?

    5. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Mostly from ARRL and talking with other hams that have played with it. I'd suggest checking out eham.net or qrz.net but they are mostly bitchy old farts that think all the worlds problems were caused by the Clintons. The real expert on this is Ed Hare (w1rfi)at ARRL. He'll be happy to answer any questions that you may have.

      Oh, and here's a good FAQ:
      http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    6. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by klept · · Score: 1

      Thank you. Have an extra class license myself. As for all those old hams, well the less said the better.

    7. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by Nethead · · Score: 1

      "Have an extra class license myself."

      Then why are you asking a lazy NCT like me? :)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:BPL plays hell with radio. by klept · · Score: 1

      Sorry to bother you. Thought you were one of the more intelligent hams. And the intelligence has nothing to do with the title. You are right though, reading anything the stupid ARRL puts out is a waste of time. I was being polite earlier in not making any comments about that. Now just get lost and dont write me back every 3 seconds.

  34. Sorry but you just made me come up with this by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 3, Funny

    What do you get when you cross a Tasmanian Devil and a /.er? A deviled egg-head!

    Thanks, folks, I'll be back tomorrow too.

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
  35. In the US by Baener · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brodband over Powerlines has been offered in the Allentown/Bethlehem area of Pennsylvania USA, since 2004 by PPL electric utilities.

    1. Re:In the US by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      it's also offered in rural areas of Eastern Washington state, and it may be available in parts of Oregon, as I recall.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:In the US by e4tmyl33t · · Score: 1

      really? I've surprisingly never heard about it (although I live up near Wilkes-Barre, so... :/) but I know a few people who live down in that area...

      of course, most people I talk to out of my immediate area are mostly tech-idjits...

      --
      --"Hm. It seems the waffle couldn't handle it."
    3. Re:In the US by Goody · · Score: 1

      PPL has about six areas; they are a couple blocks each. A list of BPL locations in the US is here.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  36. 6mbps already available in my area. by MobileMrX · · Score: 1
    In Cincinnati, "Current Communications" is currently rolling out a 3mb up / 3mb down internet connection for 35 bucks or so a month.

    I cant wait till I have 3mb up at my house.

    1. Re:6mbps already available in my area. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - unfortunately you won't enjoy it for long...

      - all it takes is for someone to start using 50-100W or more amateur radio transmissions (or truckers on I75 keying up w/1,000W 11m amps), and you can kiss your connection bye-bye!

      - good luck...

      - BPL is a very bad idea...

      - btw, Verizon DSL is 3.3/800 for $29.95 a month...

  37. Hackable? Homebrew? by green+pizza · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have the pinouts so I can make a NEMA 5-15P to RJ-45 crossover cable?

    Muhahaha!

    I wonder if I need to use Cat5 cable or lamp wire?...

    1. Re:Hackable? Homebrew? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Hackable? Homebrew? by Billy+the+Impaler · · Score: 1

      They already have those. It's called the etherkiller and I don't reccomend you buy one.

      http://www.fiftythree.org/etherkiller/

  38. A couple of questions. by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A couple of years ago I did some work for these guys. Their products were great, but ISTR that only about 6 homeplug devices could be used on a given circuit. OK, things will have moved on a bit in that time, but I wonder what the limit is now. Also, they would not work across a transformer. Correct me if I'm wrong, but where I live every neighbourhood has a step-down transformer to convert the high voltages used to transport electricity over the grid to something that won't fry any poor bugger that gets within a few feet of it.

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:A couple of questions. by Chalex · · Score: 1

      You are exactly correct. The slashdot editors have confused HomePlug and BPL.

  39. What's the real capacity by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How many people share a powerline? More than share my cable loop? How much capacity per subscriber?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  40. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    Secondly, if saying Maoris are a reason not to move to a country isn't racist, I'm not sure what is.

    Well other then it would be speciest, I don't think the Maoris will form a coalition and lobby world gov'ts for equal rights.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  41. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1
    Secondly, if saying Maoris are a reason not to move to a country isn't racist, I'm not sure what is.

    I learned everything I know about Maoris from Whale Rider and the All Blacks...

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
  42. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by maird · · Score: 1

    Was it evasion or accident that caused you to not include Kylie Minogue and Rolf Harris. I'd like to add Eric Bogle but I guess he's a niche celebrity.

  43. If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    This fatal flaw will seriously limit the way that BPL can be deployed and will decrease the reliability of a BPL system in any area where it is possible that nearby radio transmitters could be operating. Under the FCC's rules, BPL is an unlicensed device that must accept any interference caused to it by authorized radio services. In the past, and through decades of experience, such interference is rare to other broadband services, such as DSL, cable or satellite. However, in all of the BPL areas tested for susceptibility so far, the unshielded wiring that is used by BPL apparently picks up nearby radio transmitters and overload or otherwise degraded the performance of the system. Although this has been seen at power levels as low as 5 watts from Amateur Radio transmitters, Amateur Radio transmitters can use as much as 1500 watts of power, greatly extending area over which BPL will be unable to tune out these over-the-air signals.

    Perhaps in the US, but it's Australia testing it in Tasmania, where the FCC has no jurisdiction, as that is a US agency, and Australia is a sovereign country that has its own agencies. And it's not like Antartica will be complaining about radio interference - they're too far away to the south.

    Tasmania is an island on the SE tip of Australia.

    And they can decide which band to use, regardless of what the Yanks want.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Yea Will, but it covers almost the whole HF spectrum. And .au land has their "cb" up in the 450MHz range. But the idea still holds.\

      Now get back to http://monorails.org/

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    2. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of the frequency spectra problem, from when I worked for Nextel.

      So, as you describe it, it could cause interference in the mostly rural state of Tasmania, but due to their isolation, they may be willing to live with the impact, and the interference would be fairly limited in scope.

      Perhaps they may find techniques to deal with that as well.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    3. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I thought that Nexthell was 800 trunked radio (ok, IDEN.) Maybe the TDMA pulses would would cause very local RFI to BPL but the main problem is working weak signals on HF (QRP and all that.) In remote areas ham radio is rather important. Of course I guess ham radio would really be important when BPL fails :) ...problem solved.

      Vote For Dick! http://falkenbury.com/

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    5. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I just found this site and it like h4x0x l337. Gonzo buddy says it's not on his list though and I should be filling out a survey... guess it's time to go.. gotta keep buddy happy!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    6. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      ok, so long as I don't have to vote for Dick Falkenbury ... sorry, but I like the incumbents.

      seriously, tho, while I do realize that Ham radio is important, at some point one needs to test such technologies out in a fairly remote area, and Tasmania does qualify in those respects. One hopes they will find some methods - frequency shifts are the first to come to mind, as perhaps not all bands are impacted equally - to deal with the radio interference effects of running data over power lines.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    7. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Nethead · · Score: 1

      "this sig is looking for Bioinformatics or DBA work in Seattle, especially at the UW, since our grant ran out"

      Contact me will. joe@nethead.com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:If BPL mucks w radio, it's not FCC prob by Chuq · · Score: 1

      at some point one needs to test such technologies out in a fairly remote area, and Tasmania does qualify in those respects.

      ... except the trial is being run in a few of the central suburbs of Hobart. People in these areas who want broadband, would probably already have DSL. (I don't believe the areas are DSL blackspots, though I may be wrong.)

      --
      - Chuq
  44. Cue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The amateur radio geeks and their incessant whining. Pssst I'll let you in on a secret, radio dorks, NO ONE CARES what you think about this. NO ONE CARES that your silly little HOBBY will be harder or impossible. Maybe if you mattered they would. But you don't.

    1. Re:Cue by Declarent · · Score: 1

      Hiya Troll!

      You'll care plenty in the next communications disruption. Perhaps you didn't know that the HAM operators carry emergency traffic when regular comms are down.

      Or maybe you didn't know that the same bands are used by the military and airlines.

      I guess those are hobbies, too.

    2. Re:Cue by z-kungfu · · Score: 1

      What a troll... maybe they don't understand that Emergency channels also run into the same issues as the Ham operators...

  45. Watchout! by cniebla · · Score: 1
    The topic is not new to Slashdot. I think it's wonderful that there are other means to provide with broadband to people, but I think the alternative proposed by Lessig that the spectrum must be returned as a public utility to the citizens should provide with all the band we need. There's really a big discussion by "media" and "providers" companys at all fronts with many goverments to easy the way for this technology, proved that using phone-company's cables is hard, expensive and over-regulated. Many businesses see this as a really big oportunity, and once again keep things private-owned for the sake of business owners.

    Aside from this theme, there's the interference: power lines act as antennas that amplify and increase (by air) the frecuencies the BPL modems use. And this is bad for radio comunications, notably amatteur operators.

    As mentioned before on Slashdot, Japan's JARL has stopped any implementation of the technology if they could not come with an answer to the interference, and USA's ARRL it's threatening even with legal action, as a nice article they've made stats.

    To give you an example of the amplitude of the problem, here in Mexico the technology is seen as a means to compete with the largest provider (some say a monopoly) by smaller companys, they've been granted capital by Google, Goldman Sachs and Hearst Corporation, and they talked with goverment officials (disclaimer: I'm one of them) to get sympathy (on competitive grounds and consumer's benefit), and my side has stated clear that we're not going to support BPL if there's a disruption in HAM's radio comunications.

    Ladies and gentlemen: this is a HUGE, and we must wellcome anything that increases competitive business, lowers prices and amplify the reach of broadband access to the Internet, but keeps things as important as Amateur Radio working...

  46. What is the "backbone"? by jsveiga · · Score: 1

    Is the data riding the low-voltage lines (110/220V), or the primary distribution lines (15/13.8kV)? (note: voltages may vary depending on your country)

    IIRC, there was an article years ago on Wired saying that data over power lines could work better (only?) in some countries due to the architecture of the power distribution grid.

    If it relied in big central transformers, then wide areas covered by a low-voltage grid it would be easier to implement (the continuous "media" would cover a large area).

    If it had high-voltage lines all over the place, then a myriad of small-power (~10kVA) transformers to serve low-voltage for every neighborhood/block/building, then it was a problem, because every transformer would have to have a "data bypass" to interconnect the "subnets". (this is the Brazil scenario).

    The Wired article was about a guy who claimed to have solved the bypass issue, but had failed to show anything more than pretty numbers.

    Was that problem solved, or Australia has the "good case" power grid?

    1. Re:What is the "backbone"? by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      AAARGH! "small-power (~100kVA)" !!!

  47. Okay... so, stupid question by mcc · · Score: 1

    the unshielded wiring that is used by BPL

    Okay. So how hard is it to add shielding?

    I mean, serious question. It isn't like we'd have to rewrap the entire fifty zillion miles of power lines in the U.S., or anything. Broadband at this point is mostly a "last mile" problem. The only wires you'd have to reshield are those wires in the last mile. Once you've done that, getting lots of fiber or something directly to the NOC is easy.

    1. Re:Okay... so, stupid question by Snorpus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, it would be pretty hard to add shielding to existing power lines. Remember, the lines up on the poles aren't 110/220 house wiring, they're running distribution level voltages, probably 7-15kV. The shield should be a ground potential, so you'll need insulation between the conductor and the shield. Think of insulation thicknesses ~100 greater than for house wiring.

      Which would add greatly to the weight of the line, so they'd have to re-engineer the whole distribution system, pole spacings, guy wire strengths, everything.

      As often has been said in this BPL debate, we'd all be better off if they just strung some fiber.

    2. Re:Okay... so, stupid question by mcc · · Score: 1

      I see, thank you.

    3. Re:Okay... so, stupid question by Goody · · Score: 1

      Okay. So how hard is it to add shielding?

      It could be done. This is called coaxial cable, and your cable company has been stringing the stuff up for years. They have also been providing broadband for years, too. BPL has been trying to do it for seven years :-)

      And by the way, if you shielded the lines, you could use much more efficient modulation methods than BPL does, and get many more bits per hertz than BPL. And, yes, the cable companies are doing this already.

      I would beg to differ that broadband is a last mile problem, especially in rural areas. It's easy to put wireless up or BPL if you listen to industry claims. It's a bear getting a couple meg of Internet bandwidth out to a system in the sticks that serves only a couple people, or at least have it be anywhere close to economically viable.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
  48. Security! by coopaq · · Score: 1
    Sounds like a secure connection to me.

    "Hey, Johnson tap that connection over there to copy the data stream."

    ZAAAAAAPPPP!!!!! EWWWOAH!!

  49. And another question by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 1

    Another question: how fast is it? "12Mbps" you say? No, that's not how fast it is. That's how "big" the pipe is. What I want to know is: how much latency?

    If this is anything like satelite, I wouldnt go near it even if it did come to the US.

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
  50. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by IdleTime · · Score: 1

    Talking about the 80's and cheesy, what about Olivia Newton-John?

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  51. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by donscarletti · · Score: 1

    Are you referring to the Treaty of Waitangi?

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  52. Laughter ... hams lost? Think again, genius ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I may not be able to receive because of the BPL interference, but I can still transmit.

    Legally.

    Ansd, I can do so at power levels that will utterly destroy all BPL signals within a half-mile of my truck.

    And, that's the FIRST thing I will do when/if the BPL noise shows up **anywhere near** where I live.

    The BPL service WILL be taken out, randomly, and the idiot techno-nothings at the power companies won't be able to find me ... and even if they did, what I'd be doing is PERFECTLY LEGAL.

    The unreliable BPL service will be dismissed by the early customers due to poor value. Who wants their Vonage, pr0n surfing, etc., to be randomly interrupted?

    Game, set, match.

  53. Hello broadband over power lines, goodbye radio by drwho · · Score: 4, Informative
    Each time there's an article on BPL here on slashdot, I find it neccessary to point out that it is a destructive technology, making HF radio pretty much unusable.

    While you may not think that your neighbor yammering on his CB, or another neighbor listening to broadcast from Radio Swaziland,or listening talk radio on AM broadcast are very important, there are other communications that are also disrupted: HF radio is used by emergency response agencies all over the world. The inadequacy of communications (among other failures of emergency services) was well demonstrated by the recent Hurricane Katrina disaster. BPL will make this worse.

    HF radio, unlike cellular telephones and other centralized radio systems, has the ability to comunicate over long distances without any intermediate infrastructure. The is vital for disaster communications where the infrastructure is overloaded or destroyed.

    Worst hit would be the poorer nations of the world, where telephone service is often unavailable or unreliable, and much of the communication has depended on HF radio. While the interference at a distance will be less, it will still be strong, very easily strong enough to make a weak signal calling for help in Afria disappear in BPL noise generated in Australia or the US.

    It goes both ways: HF radio can also interfere with BPL. I think that, in an area where BPL is interfering with Amateur Radio, that the Amateurs will not hesitate to use more powerful transmitters (if they can afford the electric bill for doing so). These will disrupt BPL, quite easily to the point of being unusable. And I doubt the BPL ISP will let you out of the contract because of such interference! So don't sign up. It's not worth the headache, and the guilt, and angry hams and other angry HF radio users.

    1. Re:Hello broadband over power lines, goodbye radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "HF radio is used by emergency response agencies all over the world." Not to mention just about every large (over 500t) ocean-going ship. And they require HF for DSC (digital selective calling) to transmit and receive emergency data as well, like: "we're sinking at lat/long". I might go down to hobart (2.5 hrs south of here)and check it out. I'll report back.

  54. I like it by sxmjmae · · Score: 1

    I had set up a computer in the basement furnace room and tried to get a wireless connection to it. It never worked 100% of the time.
    I tried the internet over the power line. Set up a connection from my office upstairs to the basement and presto an instant connection. I was so impressed with how easy it was to install. took me less than 5 minutes and that includes the walk from upstairs all the way down to the furnace room.

    I use the computer as a file server for MP3 and other old files that I want to have access to at various locations around the house.

    I do have power line filters and UPS on both ends of the Internet over the power line adaptor with drops the transfer rate to about 5-6 megs a second. With out the power line filters and UPS I was easily getting 10-11 Megs a second. I am not transferring 100's of Megs at a time.

    I am impressed with the technology and was impressed how flawlessly and seamlessly it works. Given how poorly people set up a wireless router for their home I would rather have them set up a simple internet of the power line for their home. It can be a tad bit more secure.

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
  55. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Narcissus · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you're not thinking of Kiwis??

    This is a Maori.

    This is a Kiwi.

  56. Few Facts about electricity in Tasmania by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

    I don't know if this is the reason for the trial, but Tasmania has only one power company for the whole state (Aurora Energy, or when I worked there.. the Hydro Electric commission). In the 1950's, a forward-thinking premier of the state invested a lot of money into powering the entire state via hydro electricity. Being an island, it's also fully self-contained and I believe generates a fairly hefty surplus each year (or used to..)

    1. Re:Few Facts about electricity in Tasmania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Transend, the transmission arm of the 3-company group handling generation, trasmission and retail in Tasmania. We do indeed still generate a significant surplus which will be sold on the national electricity market from some point next year.

      I wonder if BPL principles could be used with high transmission lines too? We run 22, 110, and 220kV lines around the state.

      Also I think when they say "Tiny" it might be talking more population (500,000) than geographic size :)

      While this is great for users outside DSL areas, for me it's not so huge. My local exchange has ADSL2 12mbit/1mbit ports with one particular provider iiNet and an ADSL2+ 24mbit/1mbit carrier - Internode entering soon. Certainly not with 2GB limit either!

    2. Re:Few Facts about electricity in Tasmania by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me? Was it just my imagination then, that the papers (Examiner, Mecury, Advocate) were quoting Hydro execs as saying that Hydro's dams were nearly empty? And we could be looking at statewide brown outs?

      Of course with the recent rains theres no need to worry anymore but... Basslink will be good for one thing only, buying power from the Mainland when Hydro drys up!

      (BTW, what phone exchange are you on? I want to live THERE XD ADSL2+ hasn't reached Launnie yet)

  57. Ham Radio? by Rickler · · Score: 1

    This is a horrible idea. It will mess up ham radio.

    --

    The human race is artificial intelligence created using object orientated programming.
  58. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

    What's the transfer limit? That's the one thing preventing me from moving to Europe - most ISPs have some sort of transfer limit that, when triggered, I've heard puts you on dial-up speeds.

  59. HOMEPLUG, not jus BPL by ifwm · · Score: 1
    1. Re:HOMEPLUG, not jus BPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's HomePlug, not BPL. Read and be enlightened.

  60. Re:Laughter ... hams lost? Think again, genius ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "I can still transmit. Legally. Ansd, I can do so at power levels that will utterly destroy all BPL signals within a half-mile of my truck"

    That's just mean & nasty, but I'll be in my van about a mile from you, and will be glad to rag-chew with you for hours on end. Let's see... at 3920 KHz, LSB, with the interference level the way it would be from the BPL, we would need about 1.5 KW PEP, right? The law says we have to use the lowest amount of power for reliable communications, so, as you said, it would be "PERFECTLY LEGAL."

  61. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by asac · · Score: 1

    Both ISPs are so self-named premium ISPs in Germany. All discount providers do it the way you described above. AFAIK, both: Alice and T-Com never put a transfer limit on anyone. In fact, I use Alice too (6Mbit/s Down, 600 kbit/s Up) and never experienced any limit.

  62. A Ten Gallon Hat.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... on a 2 ounce head

  63. Motorola & Emergencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Powerline broadband has received wide support from leading vendors including Intel, Motorola and Cisco Systems."

    This is classic Motorola behavior. Sell a new system, such as the increasingly common but expensive 800 MHz trunking. Then let problems develop, such as interference from digital data over power lines. Motorola can then market a new system that's more immune to that noise. Imagine yourself as a cop in serious trouble and you can't reach a dispatcher because of a nearby power substation, and you'll see why communities will be forced to upgrade yet again, and again, and again.

    Even more important is the interference these systems will create with disaster communications. HF radio (3-30 MHz) is one of the few ways to communicate out of a wide-area disaster such as a hurricane, and HF is utter trashed by digital data over powerlines, which are nothing more than giant antennas attached to broadband noise generators. And those who claim that disaster areas don't have a functioning power grid miss the point. In a disaster you need to be able to communicate out of the disaster area to undamaged locale where the phones and Internet still work. That's where reception will be rendered difficult or impossible, particularly since HF communications already has to contend with high natural noise levels, particularly at the low end of HF (3-7 Mhz) used by most disaster communication.

    One of the key failures in Louisana was the inability of poorly prepared New Orleans and Louisiana state officials to communicate with each other, so they could discover what was happening and make sensible (rather than hysterical) requests to FEMA. There the problem seems to have been the competence of the mayor, governor and those they had appointed. But digital over power could be deadly even when the area affected has disaster officials as competent and well-prepared as those in Florida have become since hurricane Andrew.

    --Mike Perry, KE7NV, Seattle, Author: Untangling Tolkien

  64. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    See thats what happens when someone uses a list of things, and the fourth item of the list is not comparable to the other three. Animal, Animal, Animal, Tribe of Humans.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  65. $12 for 256K by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Wow. I'd certainly pay $12 for 256K. I pay $14.95/mo right now for dialup, and would love to be able to keep an always-on connection and leave my phone line free, even without the speed increase.

    It's rather annoying as I do tech support for a cable internet company in another state that offers 256K down for as low as $19.95/mo in some of their markets (rural CO/WY) while my provider (eastern KS) only offer 3M down as the lowest speed (and charges $29.95, a little more than I want to pay)

    1. Re:$12 for 256K by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'd certainly pay $12 for 256K.

      But with only 20mb of included data?

      --
      - Chuq
  66. ripoff by supersmallfry · · Score: 1

    4mbps for $67?? I get 5mbps for $45

    1. Re:ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm. Free offers 20 Mbps down/1Mbps up for 30 Euros

  67. Radio dorks? ... Better keep your dial-up, asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I may not be able to receive because of the BPL interference, but I can still transmit.

    Legally.

    And, I can do so at power levels that will utterly destroy all BPL signals within a half-mile of my truck.

    And, that's the FIRST thing I will do when/if the BPL noise shows up **anywhere near** where I live.

    The BPL service WILL be taken out, randomly, and the idiot techno-nothings at the power companies won't be able to find me ... and even if they did, what I'd be doing is PERFECTLY LEGAL.

    The unreliable BPL service will be dismissed by the early customers due to poor value. Who wants their Vonage, pr0n surfing, etc., to be randomly interrupted?

    Game, set, match.

  68. Broadcasting powerlines by novakane007 · · Score: 1

    Years ago, when they were testing data over power lines in the UK, they had problems with the powerlines carrying data actually broadcast the data and you were bale to pick it all up simply by standing near an overhead. You'd obviously need the appropriate gear to pick up the data, but it still was a privacy issue. Has that problem been looked after?

    --

    WURD!!
  69. FAQ by Nethead · · Score: 1

    Here's a good FAQ on BPL:

    http://www.qrpis.org/~k3ng/bpl.html

    73 de w7com

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:FAQ by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      w7com tu de nil cs.

      Technician exam on Saturday though.

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    2. Re:FAQ by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Good luck, and don't stay a NCT for 12 years like I have :)

      73

      Joe

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    3. Re:FAQ by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      12 years?! Shouldn't you be an extra-with-all-the-trimmings by now? ;)

      Thanks for the luck wishes. I'm pretty confident overall -- I've been taking the practice exams (Thanks to AA9PW for putting them out there) and passing consistently. I'll drop you a line Sat evening to let you know how it went. 73!

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    4. Re:FAQ by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I did have a 1st class radiotelephone ticket in another life. Email me when you pass.

      joe@w7com.com

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  70. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm pretty sure the US has all of the above except for Maori. Off the top of my head:

    Deadly Spiders - brown recluse, black widow, though actual deaths are unlikely. Loss of limbs due to gangrene is a more common outcome, and a lot of pain is more common yet.

    Deadly Snakes - assorted rattlesnakes, and others. these are likely to cause more damage if you get bit, but bites are much easier to avoid.

    Deadly Sharks - we get shark deaths/bites occassionally, though you're much more likely to die by lightning strike.

    So now lets find out what a maori is

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&hs=kMG&lr=&clie nt=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&oi=def more&q=define:Maori

    which indicates maori are the natives of new zealand. I'm unclear on how natives of new zealand would be more likely to kill you in australia than the US. Are there a lot of murderous emigrees?

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  71. Re:Laughter ... hams lost? Think again, genius ... by Snorpus · · Score: 1
    Although there's also the clause about "willful and malicious interference" that they might get you on. Then again, is it possible to interfere with an unlicensed operation that, by regulation, must accept without recourse any interference?

    That said, there's nothing quite like an amp at 2.5kV, hitting the plates of a pair of 3CX800A7s.

  72. wake up! by davygrvy · · Score: 1

    BPL causes gross EMI radiation on FCC protected bands due to the use of unshielded transmission lines (powerlines are more like antennas) and is also highly sensitive to interference from legal RF transmissions.

    BPL has to be killed. If BPL trials come to my area, I'm going to get my HAM radio liscense, a Yaesu 20 meter transmitter, and drive around transmitting legal power and kill all your downloads!

    http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/HTML/plc/
    http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?na tive_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6515383154

    --
    -=[ place .sig here ]=-
  73. Someone Failed Geography by fgl · · Score: 1

    Maori are from New Zealand, not the mythical land of Oz...

    --
    Go Away! Not for Sale
  74. Reason #1 NOT to move to Australia: by chill · · Score: 1

    Finding a library guilty of copyright infringement for placing a photocopier right next to a stack of books. So close, it induced people to copy books! The horror!

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  75. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Deadly Spiders - brown recluse, black widow"

    Call those deadly? In the words of Mick Dundee (probably poorly remembered) 'Now I don't want to put down your Black Widow spider, but a Funnel Web spider can kill a man in 8 seconds... just by looking at him.'

    "Deadly Snakes - assorted rattlesnakes, and others."

    Call those deadly? Four of the five deadliest snakes in the world are Australian. The venom from one bite of a Fierce Snake (Inland Taipan) is enough to kill 100 people. 1/14,000th of an ounce of the venom from a Western Brown is enough to kill you.

    The North American Coral Snake comes in at a measly 8th, and the Mojave Rattlesnake is 11th. Just your basic lizards really.

    "Deadly Sharks - we get shark deaths/bites occassionally"

    They catch sharks bigger than Jaws off the coast of Western Australia. And we still surf and go swimming out there.

    Now Maoris I can believe are deadly! I wouldn't want to tangle with most of the ones I have met. Mind you they are nice people, so no need to tangle with them.

  76. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hm.. Here, in Sweden, quotas only applies in some case, either to the highest speeds or the most crappy of ISPs.
    I currently have a 41$/month 10Mbit (both ways) service.
    For example, there is a 100 mbit(also both ways) option from my provider(Bredbandsbolaget, it costs approx.77$/month) they have a cap at 300 GB each month. If if you go beyond that, either you pay
    26$ for each 100GB beyond that, or continue at 128 kbit/second.
    If you don't use all the extra quota(not the base quota), it's transferred to the next month.

    My understanding is that caps, like the one i just mentioned, in general are still quite rare.
    However, i know that ISP:s in Great Britain and France was known to be really bad before(anyone know how it is now?). Maybe that's what you heard?

  77. Crappy sales pitch. by JPriest · · Score: 1
    So it isn't 12 meg, it is 4. And the 4 meg costs $67 even in trial. Also, that is not a symetrical 4 meg, the upload is slower. Intel could sample 10Ghz processors today if they wanted also, but when will the mainstream actually see them?

    When this technology does hit mainstream availability where will Cable, DSL, FiOS, and WiMax be? It isn't accurate to compare the specs of a future technology with what Cable and DSL are have today.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  78. Power? by z0l0pht · · Score: 1

    I dont know how, but someone is going to figure out a way to send a huge amount of current over the line and blow someone's computer out of their wall.
     
    I, for one, am looking forward to it :-D

  79. potential difference! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watt? This could make a potential difference to Australia's current broadband availability!

  80. Transfer limit by anotherzeb · · Score: 1

    An account with no download limit with tesco.net in the UK costs £17.97 per month, according to their website. How much are you currently paying?

    --
    Good luck sometimes arrives disguised as bad
  81. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by nighty5 · · Score: 1

    Naomi Watts -> Ring Series
    Cate Blanchett -> Lord of the Rings
    Hugo Weaving -> Lord of the Rings
    Sam Neil -> Jurassic Park (Grow up in Melb)
    Anthony LaPaglia -> Without a Trace
    Geoffrey Rush -> Pirates of the Caribbean
    Nicole Kidman -> Days of Thunder
    Heath Ledger -> The Brothers Grimm

    Lots of others, most born in Oz, some moved at an early age.

  82. Re:Laughter ... hams lost? Think again, genius ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah.. "Perfectly legal"... You keep thinking that way pal, and I'll read about you being tossed in jail for being the twit you are. If you haven't learned yet that messing with the bull gets you the horns, then you're either very young, or just a slow learner.

  83. What does it mean to the user? by johansalk · · Score: 1

    What does it mean to the user? Does it mean you just plug in your computer to a socket in the wall without any changes to the building? Are new wires required?

    1. Re:What does it mean to the user? by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the service is delivered over the electricity lines to your house (BPL), AND through your houses electrical wiring to all your standard electrical outlets (HomePlug).

      --
      - Chuq
  84. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geoff, Heath, Sam and Hugo were born in NZ, Naomi and Nicole were born overseas (USA? Can't remember.)

  85. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seen "Once Were Warriors"?

  86. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again, You'll find that there ARE NO CROCODILES in Tassie. Too freaking cold. Other than that, its great here :D

  87. I demand naked service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm fed up with all these companies trying to package services together and forcing people to pay for all of them. Give us broadband without the mandatory electricity, oh wait . . .

  88. Tasmanian BPL is less than it seems by fenichel · · Score: 1

    The Tasmanian trial appears to be BPL-to-the-home rather than Homeplug. What's on offer is disappointing: low download limits, poor speed and uncompetitive pricing. Have a look at http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t =266922&p=8#r153/ for detailed criticism All in all it looks like yet another BPL beat-up: enthusiasm, spin and disappointment when trials don't proceed to a large-scale commercial roll-out. That is inevitable because the cost of fixing radio frequency problems means BPL in Australia is commercially uncompetitive

  89. Is not Internet over Power Lines Evil? by mi · · Score: 1
    Because it interferes with HAM radios?

    Last time this came up, FCC took some serious beating on /. for "pandering to big business" at the expense of HAM radios and the few emergency crews that, supposedly, still use them.

    Some (high-moderated) remarks about Michael Powell (the then-FCC chairman) were rather unkind...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  90. Power stations not in geosynchronous orbit by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    I'd imagine that the signals travel somewhat less than 72,000 miles, so latency is likely to be somewhat less than satellite.

    Presuming the modems at each end are as efficient as DSL & use similar packet sizes, there's little reason to expect different latencies.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  91. In other news... by katty+kat · · Score: 1

    Tasmanian Police were sent to a house of one of the triallers after the RIAA contacted them to let them know illegal downloads were taking place. A RIAA spokeperson said that their network of informers had told them that the trialler "was using the internet to download ACDC, or something like that"

  92. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by strider44 · · Score: 1

    Yes, like Tasmania is the island south of the mainland, the Maoris live on the Australian islands east of the mainland. The only problem is because of the sorrowful state of human rights in Australia we don't give them a vote.

  93. Re:List of non-deadly creatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the sheep.

  94. Beware the data limits, and speed shaping by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Yeah, but would you be happy with only 20 MB of data each month?

    That'd be gone in about 10.5 minutes. Another 5 minutes later, and your speed would be reduced back to that of dialup. Oh, and they charge you 10c/MB beyond that too.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  95. Power Supply Modems by ozTravman · · Score: 1

    How long will it be until broadboand modems are integrated into computer power supplies....

  96. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

    I'm unclear on how natives of new zealand would be more likely to kill you in australia than the US. Are there a lot of murderous emigrees?

    Over here we call them "rugby players"

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  97. packet sniffing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTA: " Data packets passing down unshielded cables cause them to act like giant antennas, spreading interference over a wide area, according to a report in The New Scientist "

    Pure uneducated speculation would suggest to me that packet sniffing would be incredibly easy.. Am I wrong?

  98. Why not just hang a fibre bundle on the pole too? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

    The whole idea of using normal power lines for data transmission is just plain silly, at least in urban areas. When you factor in the costs of all the extra hardware needed to inject and extract the data while blocking the electricity itself, then add the problems inherent in trying to send data down what's literally an unshielded bare wire, then compare the cost of doing that to, say, hanging a fibre bundle on the pole, the whole rationale for using the power lines goes down the toilet.

    The ONLY reason American power companies care about broadband-over-power lines is because they want to be the third data carrier in their market, standing alongside the phone and cable companies. The catch is, due to government regulation, getting permission to hang fibre bundles next to power lines (with zero mutual interference) is a major problem, vulnerable to challenges by the incumbent phone and cable companies. But if they can somehow squeeze data down the power lines, it's easier to slide it past the regulators.

    I guarantee -- the moment the FCC officially codifies the right of power companies to offer broadband and makes it an unalienable right not subject to refusal or regulation by states, every last power company in America will instantly abandon broadband over power lines and run fibre instead unless they're explicitly prohibited from doing so.

  99. 400 Mbps? BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call BS. There is no way in hell you can get more ( let alone vastly more ) data over a single conductor of varrying size that is connected to dozens or hundreds of end points with all kinds of noise than you can over a point to point twisted pair.

    I mean just think about it for a second. 100 MBps ethernet can only run what? 100 meteres? And that's over high quality point to point twisted pair ( two pairs actually, one for xmit, one for recv ), not the rat's nest that is a typical power grid.

  100. Transformers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is one of the main problems, yes. Transformers clobber the high frequency signals so they require extra repeaters to be installed to bypass the transformer.

    A typical grid in the US consists of a distribution station, which steps down the 650,000+ volt transmission line to ~15kV and distributes it out over the lines on poles next to the streets.

    The street lines typically run for a few miles where they are stepped down via a transformer to 440 or 880 volts for transit in underground lines into your neighborhood.

    Then typically every 4-8 houses is connected to another transformer, usually in green metal hut, that steps the voltage down to 110/220 that is fed to the houses.

    Assuming they ran fiber to the distribution station and then BPL from there, they would have to install a relay at the transformer on the pole, and each of the green huts in the neighborhood.

    Assuming they could get say, 40 Mbps from the distribution station, that 40 Mbps would be shared with ohh... 10,000 people. Obviously that isn't going to work.

    So maybe they would string fiber up on the poles, and go BPL after the step down transformer to the neighborhood. Then install repeaters in each green hut.

    Now assuming they can get 40 Mbps over this ( which is very generous ) and you're sharing with the 50-200 people in your neighborhood or apartment complex, it's starting to look like cable modem type speeds or less.

    We already have cable modems around here, so why would the power company invest in all this new infrastructure when they wouldn't really be able to compete with cable?

    1. Re:Transformers by jsveiga · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I wish I could mod you + Informative...

  101. Re:Reasons to NOT move to Australia: by bluGill · · Score: 1

    The Russians have enough nukes to destroy the world three times over, while the US only has enough to destroy the world two times over! The US is behind, we need to catch up!

    Or was it the other way around? I was pretty young when the cold war ended. Either way, most people understood that it didn't matter much.

    US snakes are deadly enough to kill anyone stupid enough to get bit. It doesn't matter that snakes elsewhere don't need as much venom to do it, if you are stupid enough to get bit by a poisonous snake you die.

  102. Re: 130 Mpbs at the application layer since 2005 by 183771 · · Score: 1

    200 Mbps at the physical layer and 130 Mbps at the application layer are available since early 2005 using proprietary DS2 technology and in Europe Opera organization have taken steps to develop a standard based on this technologies.