Slashdot Mirror


NASA Puts A Stop To Space Romance

electro-donkey writes "According to a New Scientist article, romantic entanglements among astronauts could derail long-haul space trips. A top-level NASA panel has decided, though it could alleviate boredom, space sex could cause trouble too. On a mission to Mars, for example, which would take up to 30 months, sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew functioning'."

431 comments

  1. Geez... by ratnerstar · · Score: 5, Funny

    No space sex? Why the hell am I wasting my time at astronaut school, then?!

    --
    Just because you sold your soul to the devil that needn't make you a teetotaler. --The Devil and Daniel Webster
    1. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No space sex?

      TFA (yeah, I read it) doesn't say anything about banning space sex. That's something made up for the Slashdot headline.

      The first paragraph of the article sums it up pretty well "Sex and romantic entanglements among astronauts could derail missions to Mars and should therefore be studied by NASA, warns a top-level panel of US researchers."

      So a panel of researchers want to 'study' sex and romantic entaglements. Nice work if you can get it, but no 'ban' implied.

      First actually-read-the-article post.

    2. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably no beer either. Maybe some vodka on the Russian flights.

    3. Re:Geez... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

      This should be modded Insightful. If space sex were mandatory, we'd be on Alpha Centauri by now.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    4. Re:Geez... by kjots · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how exactly would they enforce it? I mean, 30 months in a tin can, millions of kilometers from home, hell, even if they restricted each mission to only one sex at a time that wouldn't stop anything, know what I mean? *nudge* *nudge*

    5. Re:Geez... by redbaron7 · · Score: 1

      Why the hell am I wasting my time at astronaut school, then?!

      Because you're a space cadet!

      RB
    6. Re:Geez... by sillybilly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't worry, you'll just have unofficially approved sex, and the officials will look the other way, treat it as taboo, as long as you don't jeopardize the mission's success, and you continue providing peak performance.

      Just imagine the weightlessness! Yipee, what fun! You'd probably have to tie yourself up to some posts because with weightlessness you can't stand in one spot, because there is no friction between your feet and the ground. Handcuffs anyone? Or just hold on to some bars, while your mate holds on to you. Or you can pretty much just hold on to each other as you both spin floating in the middle of the space cabin, getting very dizzy, then just imagine the goo floating in a big ball in mid air, when you're done, flying slowly toward the wall to make a splat. If you get carried away and spin too fast, you might hit and smash your head into the instrumentation if you're not careful. Imagine the reporters talking about an accident on the spaceship causing a few million dollars damage to some instrument, and we can cross off one of the missions from the list, cuz we no longer can do it. I guess in space 'safe sex' will have a different meaning.

      Still, this is one of the best ways to attract young college students to space school! Don't even need an ad campaign! But you better be very good at math, and in top physical shape, if you want to go on this joyride! If you didn't have an incentive to take up a science career, now you have one! And your status as a nerd will suddenly surge to the top, because not blondes, but nerds will have the most fun, that mere mortals stuck on the high gravity ground here can only dream of!

    7. Re:Geez... by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative

      No-sex enforcement is traditionally accomplished with chastity belts, male and female versions available and tested for centuries.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:Geez... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      If space sex were mandatory, we'd be on Alpha Centauri by now.

      Really...

      If GAO sex were manditory, we'd have a balanced budget by now.

      If lease agreement sex were manditory, there's be no geeks living in Mom's basement by now.

      and what I was originally going to say until I realized you said "we'd" and not "I'd":

      I'm sure you'd take any career field that had manditory sex.

    9. Re:Geez... by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      So space sex should be thoroughly studied before we do any Mars trips.

      Sounds like maybe we've finally got a justification for the ISS.

      I suppose this will probably be rated "funny", but I'm kind of serious. Considering all the limitations imposed on the ISS by the Space Shuttle, behavioral studies are one of the few fields where ISS research can be justified. (I'm not talking about just the Shuttle problems of the last few years; the ISS potential was badly reduced from the beginning, with the decision to go with the Shuttle but not to build the Space Tug.

    10. Re:Geez... by FlopEJoe · · Score: 1

      But chastity belts really chafe... err... so I'm told.

    11. Re:Geez... by FCAdcock · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If that was true, we'd all be working in porn.

      --
      --Forest C. Adcock--
    12. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Nobody told you about the sterilization process at the end of the course?

    13. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a name like Adcock, it already sounds like you're working in porn.

    14. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they jerk it in space? wouldnt that end up making a mess and cloggin the panels and such? I dont think floating spooge would be that great. I think space sex should be mandatory, they should just put em all on the space pill and let them all have the time of there lives. Just get a bunch of swinger astronauts.

    15. Re:Geez... by catalupus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No space sex? Why the hell am I wasting my time at astronaut school, then?!

      And engineering school is much better? ;-)

    16. Re:Geez... by khelms · · Score: 1

      Just watch out for that mutagenic Russian Vodka, or all hell could break loose!

    17. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ow! My feet!

    18. Re:Geez... by Cardcaptor_RLH85 · · Score: 1

      So...lemme get this straight. You're going to use a mechanical locking device and expect a few horny ENGINEERS with extremely precise equipment and 2+ years of time to not be able to break it? If the people on these missions were unable to do that much, then why would they be up there in the first place?

    19. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no friction? what are you talking about you crazing guy. if by 'no friction' you mean 'not touching the ground' ok, but that's a weird way to say 'not touching the ground'. but if you mean in space there's no friction you don't understand friction

    20. Re:Geez... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Why indeed? Presumably for politics and publicity, since robot probes are cheaper AND more effective. Lock designs that are unbeatable without specific equipment are well known, so while on earth you might have to worry about thieves or lockbreaks who have the right equipment no matter what you do, there's no particular reason to include such (heavy!) equipment on a mission to mars.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    21. Re:Geez... by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      I meant this as an introductory concept, a quick means to reveal just how different space sex would be. On Earth, mere mortals propel themselves by walking, crawling against a surface (bed, floor, table.) When you say "no friction" it instantly conveys the feeling of the new conditions. Technically you're right, there is friction, e.g. when you tie yourself up, or grab your partner, you don't have to do it near geometric constraining points, such as the neck or wrists or ankles, because you'd just slip out of some greasy ropes if you're tied up across the belly or thighs, or your hands would just slip all over the place.

      If I recall correctly my Engineering Science 101, called Statics (with Newton's laws and all that good stuff), frictional force is defined as

      F1 = mu * N

      where mu is the friction coefficient, and N is the normal force against the surface, pushing the two things together, or the normal(perpendicular) component of the force vector. In space, in the absence of this normal vector pushing you up against a surface (in the absence of being tied up, or magnetic shoes, the minute imbalance gravity inside a gravitational Faraday cage don't count as big enough here), even if the frictional coefficient is there, the frictional force is still 0, because you ain't got the N.

    22. Re:Geez... by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      So space sex should be thoroughly studied before we do any Mars trips.

      No need to study it. Just recruit all your female astronauts from Indigo Girls concerts and all your male astronauts from Broadway. That will ensure both no unplanned pregnancies and a very well-decorated ship.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    23. Re:Geez... by UltimaL337Star · · Score: 1

      We're sending a hotbed of sex driven homronal teens up there? And possibly have temporary bachelor marriages, several times? My tax dollars pay these people to HAVE SEX in SPACE?! wheres the goddamn free satallite so I can watch this soap...

  2. Where no man has gone before by Mori+Chu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't these people seen Star Trek? Kirk did it with every green woman in space, and that crew turned out fine...

    1. Re:Where no man has gone before by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes but Kird never did it with McCoy or Spock or Ensign Rand. That's the important part. NASA isn't banning interspecial sex, just sex among the crew (what NASA will do if it decides to send George Bus^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H a moneky along with the human crew is anyones guess). After all, look at Tasha and Data. He has sex with her one time, and that's it she's all like "yeah I wanna leave now. Can I get killed off or something?"

      And also look at Neelix and Kes. He is a pedophile (she wasn't even 10 years old!) and has sex with her and she turns into an evolved being that tried to destroy Voyager. Sure it turned out okay in the end, but she left the ship (and AFAIK NASA doesn't want any one-way trips for it's crew in it's planned missions).

      No, sex within the crew of a spaceship can only mean disaster. I agree with NASA, save the pecker for the green martians.

    2. Re:Where no man has gone before by SpzToid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and then consider how freaky Spock is to be around when he's not 'regular'.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    3. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you actually asking if the people at NASA have seen Star Trek?

      Congratulations, everyone! We've officially stretched sarcasm to its outer limits! Cigars all around!

    4. Re:Where no man has gone before by somersault · · Score: 1

      err I think her species dies when they're 4 so Neelix wasnt exactly a paedophile. You're sick dude =p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Kes and Neelix was kinda messed up..... but don't forget that the Tom Paris' relationship with B'Elana Torres turned out fine

    6. Re:Where no man has gone before by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Green Women? Star Trek??? Wasn't that Lost in Space? I'm sure I had fantasies about that one

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    7. Re:Where no man has gone before by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      NASA isn't banning interspecial sex, just sex among the crew

      To be serious for a moment, no one seems to have read TFA. The Slashdot heading is false. TFA says nothing about "banning" sex, just that it is a subject that has been ignored but must be studied in planning long missions.

      Now returning you to your scheduled program of sniggering jokes....

    8. Re:Where no man has gone before by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

      Well, you manage Spock, I'll try and help Tupol ...

      Just you be nice and don't disturb over the week end 8)

      --
      It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
    9. Re:Where no man has gone before by Xyrus · · Score: 3, Funny

      We'll by the time they can do a mission to Mars, the solution will be present:

      Virtual Valerie, a fully interactive holographic sex goddess. You want three boobs, you get three boobs.

      For the women, from what I hear, they're happy just with this thing called a "Rabbit" right now.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    10. Re:Where no man has gone before by ccmay · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh, ha ha ha. You called George Bush a monkey. How witty and original.

      -ccm

      --
      Too much Law; not enough Order.
    11. Re:Where no man has gone before by kahrytan · · Score: 1

      They may have ignored the problem til now but they knew about it. They are addressing the issue now.

      Ellison Quote:

      "...And there's a lack of privacy often they're monitoring pulse rate and temperature."

      NASA is able to stop ISS crew from have sex with other crew. During the trip to Mars it would be practically in possible due to long range communications.

      --
      \
    12. Re:Where no man has gone before by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Haven't these people seen Star Trek? Kirk did it with every green woman in space, and that crew turned out fine...

      No they didn't. They all took their shirts off and played pirates in at least one episode.

    13. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Oh, ha ha ha. You called George Bush a monkey. How witty and original.
      -ccm


      Points for accuracy, though.

    14. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      that crew turned out fine...

      No they didn't. They all took their shirts off and played pirates in at least one episode.


      Really? DAMMIT! I must have missed the ones with Uhura and Yeoman Rand taking their shirts off. I wonder if I can find them on bittorrent.

    15. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you can really see the steam coming out of your ears.

      Maybe next time he will say Clinton^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hthe liar and cheer you up.

    16. Re:Where no man has gone before by Cerv · · Score: 1

      Yes but Kird never did it with [..] Spock

      That's not what I heard.

      --
      sig
    17. Re:Where no man has gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where no man has come before?

  3. Do they really want to publish this? by yurnotsoeviltwin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Being an astronaut is about to swiftly leave the number one spot on the "cool careers" list for most people.

  4. Instead of sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    they will be reading Slashdot. It's the only medicine for 30 months without sex.

    1. Re:Instead of sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      IMO /. is more a cause for 30 months without sex than a remedy.

    2. Re:Instead of sex... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      ...last post!

    3. Re:Instead of sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using slashdot will be very frustrating in space. It may take several seconds for the signal to traverse from slashdot to the spacecraft and back. Therefore first posts are going to be practically impossible.

    4. Re:Instead of sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to take medicine to cause that?

    5. Re:Instead of sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they'll send 16 year olds. As we all know people don't think about sex before their 18th birthday...

    6. Re:Instead of sex... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Come on, it was a joke about light-speed delay.

      Maybe I shouldn't have made it after being up for 24 hours...

  5. Easy one by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just send a married couple, two gays, two lesbians, the Pope and Darl McBride on the mission.

    Since no one loves Darl, and the Pope loves everyone but does not have sex, relationships are stable.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    1. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      McBride is going to try and screw everyone. The Pope will have hissy fits about the homosexuals. The married couple won't be able to stand being so close to eachother all the time and seek other relationships, thereby breaking both the lesbian and the gay couple. How's that supposed to keep the crew functioning?

      The only two crews where no sex is not going to be a problem is an all male or an all female crew with no homo- and bisexuals, and only if there is enough porn on board.

    2. Re:Easy one by aussie_a · · Score: 0

      and the Pope loves everyone but does not have sex

      Errr... are you so sure about that? Although as long as no boy wonders (ala Wesley Crusher) go along then the Pope should be free of temptation.

      And there's a flaw in your plan. What if the married couple decide they want a divorce? The two gay guys are sure to have sex with each other along with the lesbians (although the Pope being there may put a damper on things, on a 30month mission it's hardly going to stop them for the entire time, besides which the Pope is likely to die while en-route, he is, after all, no spring chicken). I'd say a better crew would be one gay, one lesbian, the Pope and Darl McBride. Although the gay and lesbian may discover that they're actually bisexual en-route so even that isn't perfect.

    3. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two married couple, two gays and two lesbians? So you'd prefer an orgy?

    4. Re:Easy one by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Just send a married couple, two gays, two lesbians, the Pope and Darl McBride on the mission."

      A mission to where, a bar?

    5. Re:Easy one by pintomp3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      and what happens when the married guy suggests a 3some involving one of the lesbians and his wife?

    6. Re:Easy one by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have an even better Idea .
      Let's send 6 lesbians porn stars and a A film crew . Kills two birds with one stone , no space sex conflicts and you could fund the next Moon landing with "Star whores : A new elope "

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    7. Re:Easy one by njcoder · · Score: 4, Funny
      "The only two crews where no sex is not going to be a problem is an all male or an all female crew with no homo- and bisexuals, and only if there is enough porn on board."

      Yeah... that theory has been working out well in the prison system and in all girl colleges.

    8. Re:Easy one by Blaaguuu · · Score: 0

      "no one loves Darl, and the Pope loves everyone"

      There is a flaw in your logic...

      --
      My hand touched her hand. Her hand touched her boob. By the transitive property, I got some boob! Algebra is awesome!
    9. Re:Easy one by stare_at_the_sun · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Since no one loves Darl, and the Pope loves everyone...

      Then logically, either Darl or the Pope is not a person! (In this case, I highly suspect that Darl McBride is the guilty party)

      --
      "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me" -Jesus (John 14:6)
    10. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a flaw in your humor

    11. Re:Easy one by NicklessXed · · Score: 1

      They get porn in prison and all girl colleges? Awesome! ...although the idea of astronaut wanking sessions in space is somewhat disgusting.

    12. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all girl college students have access to as much porn as they desire (magazines, internet, in theory). you're right about the prisons though.

    13. Re:Easy one by AmicoToni · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I have an even better Idea .
      > Let's send 6 lesbians porn stars and a A film crew.

      This sounds like the plot of "Lesbian Spank Inferno"...

    14. Re:Easy one by kalleguld · · Score: 1

      Ohh, how I love the moderation on this post - 70% insightful. Is that because 70% of slashdot readers would like to see the movie? One can only guess.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health
    15. Re:Easy one by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      No no that wasn't porn , that was a documentary about a film collective

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    16. Re:Easy one by displaced80 · · Score: 1


      1) Fun.

      Or

      2) A Slap.

      --
      What's the frequency, Kenneth?
    17. Re:Easy one by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      It's been done. Liam Howlett (of The Prodigy) and Robert del Naja (3D of Massive Attack) did the music.

      --
      -mkb
    18. Re:Easy one by J05H · · Score: 1

      Don't the sailors say "It's not gay when the ship is underway"?

      I think a jacuzzi, strawberries and a stock of champange would make any Mars mission more fun! 8)

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
    19. Re:Easy one by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Chances are the porn producer would rather send men & women for the opportunity to be the first in the industry to film the zero-G money shot.

      [shudder]

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    20. Re:Easy one by TheDauthi · · Score: 1

      Next moon landing? Bah. I'm thinking colonization of local star systems! Porn is a big industry, no pun intended.

    21. Re:Easy one by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      "Oh no! Don't let that float into the " BZZZZZZZZT! BOOM!

      "Whoops."

    22. Re:Easy one by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      no one loves Darl, and the Pope loves everyone


      So, does the Pope love Darl? I, um --- (head explodes)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    23. Re:Easy one by dangerz · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot can a comment like that one be insightful.

      --
      The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
      - Albert Einstein
    24. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because since they're lesbian's they'll sleep with any female. Yep. That's how being a homosexual works, you have "no standards."

      Insensitive fucktard.

    25. Re:Easy one by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about this? Why not just send 4 horny bisexuals (2 male, 2 female) who don't have any hangups about group sex?

      Then NASA could just sell the video feed of their "fun room" to help recoup the costs on the mission!

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    26. Re:Easy one by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Just send a married couple, two gays, two lesbians, the Pope and Darl McBride on the mission.

      It's a 30 month mission isn't it? What do they do with a Pope corpse for 2 years?

    27. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That won't work. Nobody loves Darl, but he'll be fucking everyone anyways.

    28. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too late - someone already did this in one of those goofy airplanes-descending-fast-enough to simulate zero-g thingies. Be damned if I remember where you can find all the frame captures on the internet, though.

    29. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I loved the whole "women wouldn't get jealous over each other" aspect, too. Clearly the poster's never even spoken to a girl, since so few can go more than an hour of conversation without cutting down another, in some way.

    30. Re:Easy one by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Um I did say porn star you know , Quite different .
      Being homosexual only means you are attracted to someone of the same sex , nothing more. Being a porn star means you will do things like this for some Green .

      Added to the fact that it was a cynical joke

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    31. Re:Easy one by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      In a small town there is a barber. He cuts the hair of anyone who does not cut their own hair.

      --
      Why not fork?
    32. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A married couple, two gays, two lesbians, the Pope and Darl McBride are on a mission to Mars. One month into the journey, Darl steps from the cockpit of the craft and says "I've got good news and bad news for you all. The bad news is that the craft's engine appears to have suffered irreparable damage by a piece of space junk. The good news is that I'm sick to death of all of you stealing my ideas and taking credit for them up here. Since I can't tolerate any of you any longer, I'm taking one of the two man escape pods home myself. Hmm, I guess that bad news and bad news for all of you! Bwahhahahaha!" And with that he steps into a pod bay and ejects from the space craft. With only three two man pods left, the married couple reveal that they've managed to get pregnant during the mission. In the interest of the unborn child everyone decides that they should get one of the pods, and they eject. With only two pods left, one of the lesbians makes a confession. "I'm afraid I haven't been totally truthful with all of you. You see, I'm really Bisexual, and it seems I too am pregnant with the married man's child." With that, the lesbians are given a pod and they eject. This leaves the pope and the two gay men to decide their fates. The Pope says, "Though I do not agree with your lifestyle my children, I have lived a long and fruitful life. I am ready to meet my maker. You two may have the last escape pod." To which one of the gay men says, "That's super! But you don't have to worry your holiness. There are two pods left. The biggest asshole in the world ejected from the airlock."

    33. Re:Easy one by Saidin · · Score: 2, Funny

      The truth of Apollo 13 is finally released...

    34. Re:Easy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah, "Not that there's anything wrong with that".

      Now back to your regular political correctness brainwashing...

  6. Without sex for 30 months? by BottleCup · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a mission to Mars, for example, which would take up to 30 months, sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew functioning'.

    30 months??? Who the heck can function properly without sex for 30 months?

    1. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Tab+is+on+Slashdot · · Score: 0

      ????????
      You know this is Slashdot, right?

    2. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by FooGoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      As a married man...I can tell you it is possible although I wouldn't recommend it.

      --
      People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
    3. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by sznupi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The one in who the sex isn't a bit "disfunctional". When the sex is concious, when it serves itself and not releasing of stress/coping with todays world (yeah, when it doesn't have neurotic background) one can be perfectly fine without it.

      Trust me, NASA will find skilled enough psychologists to determine if candidates for Mars mission are up to the job in this regard.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Nobody who reads Slashdot comes close to functioning properly.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    5. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who the heck can function properly without sex for 30 months?

      Well slashdotters are able to function properly without sex for 30 years... oh wait.

      Living in parents basement: Check
      Anti-social behaviour: Check
      Radical beliefs: Check
      Terrorist activities: Check


      Hmmm, I guess even slashdotters can't function properly without sex for 30 months (which explains a lot).

    6. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by thesnarky1 · · Score: 1

      A 78,892,314.9 second old baby?

    7. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Trust me, NASA will find skilled enough psychologists to determine if candidates for Mars mission are up to the job in this regard.

      They better not use Australian psychologists, otherwise they'll just use Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars Trilogy as a guide. After all, Australian policemen use CSI to look for tips in solving crimes (I am not kidding).

    8. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by payndz · · Score: 2, Funny
      30? Pish. I'm approaching 168 months without sex, and still functioning perfe- GNYAAAAHHH! AAARGHHHH!

      Ahem. So, where do I sign up for this Mars thing?

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    9. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your new here arn't you ?

    10. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, your hand doesn't count as a real sex partner.

    11. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by nuigi · · Score: 1

      The 40 year old virgin.

    12. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Not to mention poor hygeine!

    13. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1
    14. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by maddskillz · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust anyone who doesn't want to have sex for 30 months. The only other example I can see of abstinence is the Catholic church, and we all know how that one works out. It doesn't matter if you like it or not, sex is built into us, so we can perpetuate the species. To deny that is not natural at all.
      They should focus their time on people who can get over a realtionship and still carry on a professional attitude, rather then treat them like babies

    15. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by systemofadown · · Score: 0

      Just 232 months for me, I'd be perfect for the mission!

      --
      Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has as its ultimate goal the betterment of humanity. -Nikola Telsa
    16. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by drooling-dog · · Score: 0, Troll
      30 months??? Who the heck can function properly without sex for 30 months?

      This directive probably came straight from the White House. Perhaps the plan is to send only born-again Republicans to Mars.

    17. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny
      GROUND CONTROL: Ah, Mars One, we just wanted to check whether you folks have been, ah, following the policy against sex, over.

      (five-minute delay while the signal propagates to the spacecraft at the speed of light, and then another five-minute delay while the reply makes its way back to Earth)

      MARS ONE: Ah, roger that, Houston. We're following that policy.

    18. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      harsh, man, harsh.

      Emmmm...join the club :)

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    19. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you're blue-balled anti-social radical terrorist living in your parent's basement?

      Why do you insult yourself instead of getting the help you so despreately need?

    20. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      267 months and counting.

    21. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you have this other way around (I might sound a bit "bad" (sorry, I'm not English speaker and proper word has escaped me), but: typical). It's not "not wanting" or "denying it", it's "not needing it to function properly".
      And your last paragraph hits the spot (as in: what this is all about): you see, mission to Mars WON'T be just another job in which people are required to carry on on a professional attitude, it will be the most extraordinary and stressfull activity in which these people will be put in in their lives. If someone requires sex to releive her/him from stresses, etc. of life on Earth, using that people for the mission could mean havoc.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    22. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, most people without an obsession can do fine without sex for years. Similary, as an astronaut you'll have to manage for 30 months without a juicy rare steak, without beer and without quite a lot of other things.

      I think you need to get over it. Oh wait - this is slashdot, where everybody talks about having sex all the time to cover up the fact that the closest you've come is some quality time with a lingerie catalogue.

    23. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score: 5, Tragic

    24. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by DarkSarin · · Score: 0

      Skilled enough psychologists? Doubtful.

      It isn't really a matter of skill, its a matter of knowledge. I haven't seen any literature regarding the ability to go without sex in space astronauts. Speaking as someone who is working on a degree in psychology, I have to say that what NASA is doing is wise (study the problem, see what problems it might cause), but probably futile.

      People are funny creatures. Over the short run, what most of us call personality isn't that great at predicting behavior in any specific situation--no matter what you read in some pop-psych book or mag. Ultimately, they will be much better off finding people that are known to handle stress well and are able to be professional even when it means dealing with that backstabbing jerk who slept with both female crew-members on the same day! Do I want that job? Sure--ultimately its a matter of personnel selection, so I'm interested.

      --
      "We don't know what we are doing, but we are doing it very carefully,..." Wherry, R.J. Personnel Psychology (1995)
    25. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of slight misunderstanding (apart from the thing that I consider my English to be quite poor...), to me skills of psychologist include also extensive knowledge, no way to get around it - yes, actually, there's no other way for me to get my degree - only 5 year studies, after high school, right to master degree available here (how's at your place?)

      And you know, the thing you write about finding people that are known to handle stress well reminded me about some thouths on the subject I had long time ago (not regarding Mars mission thought - but something similar). One of them (but not entirelly serious :p ) was thet perhaps people with known from the past problems in the area, that were dealt with very succesfully, could be considered for the job. They're at least predictable. I think NASA prefers predictable "issues" than randomness and uncertainity, right? ;)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    26. Re:Without sex for 30 months? by Bozdune · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's like a Monty Python skit. "Ah, Mission Control, roger that, but we're fucking like bunnies up here, it's as boring as hell and there's nothing else to do. So what are you gonna do about it? Bring us back??"

      I mean, really. The "long arm of the law" doesn't stretch that far. The astronauts can start sending back movies of glistening insertions, and what can those NASA morons do about it? Absolutely nothing.

      I suspect a Christian Coalition type influence at work here. "Uh, guys, let's throw the religious nuts a bone, there's another funding cycle coming up, so we'll just, uh, ban sex or something. Or look for evidence of 'Intelligent Design' on Mars. I guess red sand and red hills and red craters and red rocks and red sandstorms and ice cold temperatures qualifies as 'intelligent', doesn't it?"

  7. For the consideration of our male astronauts: by Dan+Up+Baby · · Score: 1

    "Orbiting the capsule."

    "Having a liftoff."

    "Outspacing the Soviets."

    1. Re:For the consideration of our male astronauts: by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Re-entry.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  8. Employ Me by thedogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am offering my services to NASA. As a true geek (obvious by reading Slashdot at 8:30Z) I would stick to the pure sciences of the mission and clearly state now that I not interested in sex by any means. Who needs sex when you have zero gravity anywho!

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Employ Me by xgadflyx · · Score: 0

      Ah, you're the 'guy' who also find Star Wars more appealing than both zero gravity and sex...I'd heard stories, but you confirm it. May the fist be with you.

      --
      Civilization, the death of dreams.
    2. Re:Employ Me by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

      Man, if I could have sex in zero gravity.... Woohooo!

    3. Re:Employ Me by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Eww. I don't even want to think about little beads of sweat and cum floating about the room and bouncing off walls. Man, I hope they sterilize the room after each use. Even worse if anyone has a kinky pee fetish.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Employ Me by Taladar · · Score: 1

      I would worry more about people with an asphyxation fetish...

    5. Re:Employ Me by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      Man, if I could have sex in zero gravity.... Woohooo!

      Just remember to use a condom... please.

    6. Re:Employ Me by Mozk · · Score: 1

      Oh my fucking god, I did not even think about that. Ahhhh......

      --
      No existe.
    7. Re:Employ Me by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Hehehehehe! You could autoclave the sex room if there's enough power onboard! Easy cleaning!

      Sex in zero-G sounds like fun -- just think of how perfectly shaped boobies would be in zero-Gs!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    8. Re:Employ Me by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but I wouldn't expect NASA people to be a bunch of STD carriers. But if it makes your drooling easier, I'll consider it, should the situation arise.

    9. Re:Employ Me by drooling-dog · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't expect NASA people to be a bunch of STD carriers.

      Who said anything about STDs? This is about zero-gravity. Think about it.

  9. Wacking off? by Mysteretp · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds prelude to state sponsored wacking off. Does NASA provide the pron? I'm waiting for that next announcement with them saying they do support flogging the dolphin.

    1. Re:Wacking off? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what kind of sex it is if you need it to function. And this will put you right out of the waiting line for the mission.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Wacking off? by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      horrible idea. it's hard enough sometimes to figure out where the "payload" flew off to. now take away gravity. houston we have a problem.

    3. Re:Wacking off? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The stars provide it for them. Lessee, for us guys, there'd be Andromeda and Virgo.

      Hm. Not much selection.

      Can you imagine a bunch of astronomy geeks finding dirty pictures in the stars?

  10. Nothing new by flamearrows · · Score: 2, Funny

    30 months? Nothing the slashdot crowd ain't used to, then

    --
    The indiscriminate use of vulgar language is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker
  11. Yeah, right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    NASA expects people to go without sex for 30 months? I suppose it's possible, but from everything I know about people, it seems improbable. What if two astronauts get married while they're on the mission, is it okay then? GOD SAID IT'S OKAY FOR ME TO SQUIRT LIQUID INTO YOU

    1. Re:Yeah, right. by Mateito · · Score: 1

      Hey,

      I'm sitting here reading slashdot because my wife is sulking in front of the TV because I told her I didn't want to eat chicken this evening and failed to offer up an alternative*.

      If we were supposed to be working together to land a space station, we'd be right fucked.

      Matt

      *Apparently dialing pizza isn't considered an alternative.

  12. From TFA by putko · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fine to make such a well-considered policy -- but if the astronauts are like these brutes, they'll ignore the rules and revert to their natural behavior:

    "Sexual harassment may also endanger a mission. In an 8-month space station simulation on Earth in 2000, a Russian man twice tried to kiss a Canadian woman researcher just after two other Russians had gotten into a bloody brawl. As a result, locks were installed between the Russian and international crews' compartments."

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:From TFA by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Well in all fairness, it's Russians we're talking about here...

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
    2. Re:From TFA by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      More water for Sergy, less vodka.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats where the confusion arose. You see, the Russian word for water is "vodka."

    4. Re:From TFA by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Solution: make sure the Russians aren't in our Mars capsules....then make movies about what happens in theirs!

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    5. Re:From TFA by hey! · · Score: 1

      Well, send an all female crew.

      Granted, the relationships between them will keep the Ramsey theorists scratching their heads for years, but women seem to be able to stroll around with this stuff in their head without having to stop and mutter to themselves.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    6. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Russian word for water is "Voda". "Vodka" means "little water".

    7. Re:From TFA by PGC · · Score: 1

      So, the way secure safety has nothing to do with sex. Just don't send any Russians on the 30 month missions.

      --
      The Dutch will inherit the earth. If not, we'll settle for a bit of ocean. Beta delenda est!
    8. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That is the worst possible solution. Sooner or later all crews' menstural cycles will match. Imagine mission control tyring to communicate with the spaceship, full of sensitive and somewhy enraged women with a 20 minutes transmission delay.

    9. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy... make mission control all women too...

    10. Re:From TFA by prurientknave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You act like you're suprised that astronauts would act like this. the majority of them are hotshot fighter pilots with giant egos and sex drives to match. These are ppl with a proven physical resilience to high G travel and capable of staying alert with the disorientation that comes with extended zero-g missions. Astronauts are always in contact with their mission planners on earth who guide them through each and every step.
       
      People overestimate the intelligence of the astronaut. Their most important asset is their physical conditioning and preparation and not the grey stuff in their heads.

      I'm happy nasa is thinking in advance about social dynamics in such long haul missions.

  13. Simple solution by DrXym · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ensure that every member is a complete slut.

    1. Re:Simple solution by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      What if some of your astronauts were married to people still on Earth? The feelings of guilt over infidelity alone could cause a drop in performance.

      (And don't think they'd be coasting between planets with nothing to do...there's plenty of experiments that would be more interesting performed in interplanetary space than in orbit around the Earth.

    2. Re:Simple solution by houghi · · Score: 1

      Ensure that every member is a complete slut. ... and thus we know what hotel-chain will be first to have a hotel in space.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Simple solution by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      Make sure they're unmarried, that simple. No relationships == no infidelity

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    4. Re:Simple solution by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Unmarried, no fiancee, no girlfriend/boyfriend. And they didn't break up just to be eligible for the mission.

  14. Or... by vectorian798 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...it could increase productivity because in the barren Martian landscape we would still have some sign of humanity around to keep us going.

    "One could perhaps select for people who seem to have less need for sex, or at least don't use sex as a form of self-validation", a quote from some random psychologist not part of the NASA board, but happens to be quoted in this article (seriously...do journalists just accept anything that agrees with their news titles as evidence?).

    Heh sex is a major part of all forms of life...why paint it in such a light. This is like moral judgement.

    There is validity to both sides (free choice versus disruption of work), but I don't think personal matters should be part of NASA's decisions...it just seems to be outside of their jursidiction, if you will, especially on long-haul missions where astronauts are away from other human beings for long periods of time.

    1. Re:Or... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      but I don't think personal matters should be part of NASA's decisions...it just seems to be outside of their jursidiction, if you will, especially on long-haul missions where astronauts are away from other human beings for long periods of time.

      Oh by all means. NASA should just hire any fertile sluts they can find, having sex on a 30month mission won't be a problem. Nope. Humans stay pregnant for 31 months don't they?

    2. Re:Or... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      They'll cover how to use condoms in the in flight training video right after they explain how to strap on seat belts.

      While I'm a guy, if I were headed into outer space for 31 months I'd want to be on the pill. At least so I could keep everything regular and predictable.

      If they're worried about sexual harrassment, they should send married couples. That'd make sense.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex is a problem, as are other forms of relationships, because the crew members can't go out of each other's way. In that environment, the inevitable jealousy can't be dealt with in a harmless fashion. If you're going to allow primordial instincts, you get the whole package, not just physical pleasures.

    4. Re:Or... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Heh sex is a major part of all forms of life...why paint it in such a light. This is like moral judgement.

      Did you know that the military won't take you if you're the sole provider of an infant, and that if you become the sole provider due to divorce or death, you need to arrange for someone to instantly take your child or you're booted out?

      Did you know that military officers can be ordered to stop having affairs?

      Moral judgements are part of life. The government WILL cast moral judgement upon you when you go to work for them; it's only when you're a private citizen that they have no say at all.

      There is validity to both sides (free choice versus disruption of work), but I don't think personal matters should be part of NASA's decisions...it just seems to be outside of their jursidiction, if you will, especially on long-haul missions where astronauts are away from other human beings for long periods of time.

      On long-haul missions it becomes especially important for NASA to know the impact of anything that happens ahead of time. Have you ever tried living in an apartment with four other people for four and a half years? Was it easier or harder when you all started f---ing? Did the married couple that woke you up every night make it easier or harder?

    5. Re:Or... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I think that, with billions of dollars being spent on the mission, it would be wasteful to avoid placing restrictions on the astronauts that might substantially impact the success of the mission. If that means defining what sort of relationships are acceptable between crewmembers, so be it.

      But I think it's right to be skeptical when it sounds like the rules are less a product of the actual study of actual data, than of personal judgments encoding personal biases about sex.

      Even then, I can imagine the religious right screaming bloody murder if NASA made "just do it" their official policy regarding sex. I'm imagining something along the lines of "We paid half a trillion dollars for an orbiting brothel? Vote the bums out, and replace them with godfearing prudes like ourselves!"

      I'm all for turning a Mars expedition into "The Love Boat." But we need to accept that NASA may be constrained by both psychological and political realities.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  15. No sex? by cciRRus · · Score: 1

    Just pack along a couple pr0n DVDs. ;-)

    --
    w00t
    1. Re:No sex? by Ulrich+Hobelmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, those might keep you happy for a while, but they surely won't keep you from hitting on the hottie next door!

  16. Alernatives to sexual relations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they're not allowed sexual relations, they'll have to resort to using inserting cigars into each other!

  17. Things to think about. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex is messy enough on Earth. Imagine if gravity wasn't around to constrain the range of your, ahem, volleys.

    All the female crew can wear vibrators 24/7.

    They could send lesbian crew members. Then the stroked-ego male astronauts have 30 months to crack that puzzle.

    1. Re:Things to think about. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      They could send lesbian crew members. Then the stroked-ego male astronauts have 30 months to crack that puzzle.

      Riiiight. Because lesbians never have sex with each other, do they?

      P.S. There's more to sex then sticking a penis shaped object up a woman's vagina. You may wish to look up a technical manual for more information and why a vibrator wouldn't work that well. Although women do have means to pleasure themselves which can overcome the limitations of a vibrator, I believe it isn't a substitute for the real thing.

    2. Re:Things to think about. by anarchic_teapot · · Score: 1

      ROTFL
      For a given definition of "real thing" of course. Have you no imagination, lad?

  18. In space, ... by Mori+Chu · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least you'd have privacy for the moment of climax. In space, no one can hear you scream...

  19. Three Dolphin Club by QuantumG · · Score: 1

    "How do you have sex in weightlessness?"

    I believe you need a third dolphin.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  20. Ya That'll Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what we need to do here on earth is outlaw porn, oh, and prostitution, outlaw that too, just say no and there'll be no problem. Ya that'll work

  21. no sex in space? by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Queue "Geeks In Space" / "CmdrTaco/Hemos buttfucking" jokes.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  22. Out-of-this-world sex? by Mori+Chu · · Score: 5, Funny
    Out-of-this-world sex could jeopardise missions
    What if the men promise to do a mediocre job of it instead?
    1. Re:Out-of-this-world sex? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Did the shuttle move for you, baby?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  23. Walk the plank? by adolfojp · · Score: 1

    So, lets say that you decide to violate the NASA no-sex regulations in the middle of a Mission to Mars... what do they do? Tell you to get off the ship?

    Adolfo

    1. Re:Walk the plank? by dagr8tim · · Score: 1
      So, lets say that you decide to violate the NASA no-sex regulations in the middle of a Mission to Mars... what do they do? Tell you to get off the ship?


      Adolfo


      Actually, the vote you off. Then they fire you, out of a cannon, into the sun.

      --
      "Does your computer have IP on it?"
    2. Re:Walk the plank? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Abort. Don't bother going into a parking orbit around Mars, just swing around back home. With a socially unpredictable or unstable crew, you don't want to risk your science, much less your lives.

      You might want to read the first chapter of Stranger in a Strange Land for some brief discussion on this.

    3. Re:Walk the plank? by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 1

      If you kids don't stop having sex I'll turn this ship around!

  24. 30 months without sex, though... by Senjutsu · · Score: 1

    That's not going to lead to any grouchiness at all.

  25. Masturbation? by qualico · · Score: 2, Funny

    How can I tactfully ask this?
    nevermind, I'll be point blank...

    So are you allowed to jerk off?

    Sick I know, but imagine this stuff floating around in zero G.
    Forget I said that...better *ban* this activity also.

    *sigh* There go my dreams of Mars.

    1. Re:Masturbation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      Are they allowed to blow their nose? Of course! Just make sure you have a tissue.

    2. Re:Masturbation? by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Of course, wet dreams will still be a problem.

      Nobody seems to have asked what the current rules are, especially on the ISS where crews have to deal without human contact for months at a time.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    3. Re:Masturbation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any Slashdotter knows that's what you use condoms for...

      (Posting anonymously to hide my shame.)

    4. Re:Masturbation? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      Simple, just say to the others, 'hey guys I've spilt my milkshake' and watch as everybody unstraps to hoover up all of those delicious floating globules like Homer did with the potato chips.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:Masturbation? by qualico · · Score: 1

      lmao

      that is so twisted.

  26. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There goes my dreams of getting it on with some hot space sluts.

  27. Astronaut pickup line by Mori+Chu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey baby, want to join the 238,857-mile-high club?

    1. Re:Astronaut pickup line by jkauzlar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hey baby...
      • can I try to guess your mass?
      • those boots look great with that jet-pack
      • that NASA uniform looks good on you, but it would look better floating around empty in my bed chamber
      • can I get you another cup of tang?
      • I like how you always keep the cabin properly pressurized. It reminds me so much of my mother
      • Is the Hubble telescope pointed at this vessel? (Why?) Because I feel like I'm *very* close to you [this one could use some work]
      • Are you sure your suit is shielding gamma-rays properly? (Why?) Because you look so hot
      • those must be space pants, because your ass is out of this world!
      My favorite funny earth pick-up line:
      "You remind me of my mother-- my sexy, sexy mother..."
  28. Although I haven't read TFA... by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1

    I assume the problem isn't the sex itself, but the potential end result.. Just let them stock up on RU486 and all is well!

    1. Re:Although I haven't read TFA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all is well for 1 out of the 3 parties involved in a pregnancy. From wikipedia's article about RU486:

      Side effects include an expected amount of abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding, with the possibility of nausea, vomiting and fever. Incomplete termination of a pregnancy would require further intervention by a doctor (such as vacuum aspiration).

      On July 18, 2005, Danco Laboratories admitted that there have been five deaths of women due to bacterial infection following treatment with RU-486 in the previous five years. The death cases were presumably related to vaginal application of the drug which is an "off-label use" but practised by abortion clinics.

      An "off-label use" that is nevertheless practiced by abortion clinics? But I thought these folks were ALL ABOUT women's health! Another side-effect that is only alluded to through a polite euphamism is that you might be left with a dead baby on your hands, but if not then you'll need to hire a professional baby hit-man to finish the job. If it wasn't a baby, it wouldn't be a pregnancy.

    2. Re:Although I haven't read TFA... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      It used to be that abortions were legal in the U.S. up until 'quickening' or fetal movement. Now groups want to say that life begins before an embryo has even implanted or differentaited.

      RU-486 results in 1 death in 200,000 making it twice as safe as penicillian. Those people who have suffered the worst side effects were those who took it despite being having contra-indicating factors warning against its use.
      (from religioustolerance.org)

      RU-486 still has complications in 8-10% of cases requiring surgical follow up, which I think is what you're alluding to.
      http://www.americanpregnancy.org/>

      But I thought these folks were ALL ABOUT women's health!

      I used to think doctors were all about health too, but most of them don't seem to care.
      I'm saying this as a guy who has met a fair number of doctors who were simply unable or unwilling to do simple diagnostic work. Apathy and negligence are problems throughout the medical profession. The number of unreported incidences of malpractice is high. A significant accident occurs in one out of three major operations, if memory serves. I could be off on this, I don't have time to google it. All I know is that I've had one friend injected with so much insulin that they went into a coma, and my mom had her teeth filed down by the dentist when she specifically asked for them not to be.

      Vaginal administration of RU-486 isn't contra-indicated, however. It's an off-label use, which is different. You haven't really supported the notion that it should be banned (though from what I've googled on the NIH research, oral administration is far more effective.), or even supported the notion that that was in fact the cause of these women dying.

      Bacterial infections are treatable, though some strains of S. Aureus are now resistant even to vancomycin, and starting to become resistant to the various fluroquinolones. But considering that they don't know the facts related to these women's cases, and that the infections weren't treated properly, it would seem that these women simply weren't receiving proper medical care to begin with in terms of follow up visits. That, rather than a pill, was the cause of their death. The "human at conception" camp opposes RU-486 for reasons that have nothing to do with protecting women's health.

      When it comes down to it, abortion is still far safer than pregnancy. There were 399 deaths from pregnancy in 2001 alone.

      Up until the late 1800s, 'quickening' or the time when fetal movements could be felt, was the point of no return for a pregnancy. The notion that 'life has always begun at conception' according to religious doctrine is simply not true. If you ask someone to show you a biblical passage that makes the claim that life begins at conception, I promise you they'll show you a passage that says somthing else entirely. Without fail. The notion that "people are fully human at conception" is literally the belief that undifferentiated cells are people.

      But when even Bill Frist tried to argue that it should be slightly later, he was essentially shouted down by his own party who didn't want to hear it.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Although I haven't read TFA... by billster0808 · · Score: 1
      When it comes down to it, abortion is still far safer than pregnancy
      Unless you're the child...
    4. Re:Although I haven't read TFA... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Because all cells are children, whether they behave like people or not.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  29. In space by nihilistcanada · · Score: 2, Funny

    no one can hear you go "uuuuuunnnnngggggghhhhh".

    1. Re:In space by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      "Uh, Acquarius, be advised we can hear everything you say, down here."

      Bad time to turn on VOX.

  30. I have a solution here by helioquake · · Score: 1

    Just send me and a handful of cute women into space. I promise, I'll be a good boy.

  31. Misleading title.... again. by Rxke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing in the article suggest they will put a stop on it.

    It's just another overgeneral article about pro's and cons of relationships on long missions, and some examples.

    Oh, and they're going to stuy it some more...

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Misleading title.... again. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Oh, and they're going to stuy it some more...

      Screw going to the moon, how do I get in on those studies?

    2. Re:Misleading title.... again. by BathTub · · Score: 1

      Sad thing is this is about the comment from someone that seems to have RTFA and noticed the error.

    3. Re:Misleading title.... again. by Samedi1971 · · Score: 1

      There's no need to put a stop to it when it's been officially banned since before the first American woman joined a crew.

  32. huge marketing opportunity by tcatt · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heck, NASA thinks they're so smart. If they we really thinking they would realize that a trip to mars with 8 crew members along with all the so-called 'infedelity' and 'intense relationships' is a perfect chance to corner the reality TV market!

    They'd be killing all their birds with one stone, for pete's sake. Huge media coverage, lucrative advertising sponsorships... man NASA would be overfunded and popular again for the first time since the 60's. C'mon NASA, give America what it really wants!

    They could call it "Pigs in Space" or wait.. yeah that one was taken. Too bad it's a classic.

    "Vote 'em off the shuttle!"

    --
    [I have no name!:/]# _
    1. Re:huge marketing opportunity by ChrisMroz · · Score: 1

      The guy who actually knows whats going on will be the first to go. Well NASA, my TiVo is set.

    2. Re:huge marketing opportunity by Durzel · · Score: 1

      "Spaceballs" ? Hmm, that appears to be taken too..

    3. Re:huge marketing opportunity by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      That's the best idea I've seen on Slashdot in... well, several weeks, at least.

    4. Re:huge marketing opportunity by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Plus, they'd get a steady stream of volunteers -- like me!

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  33. Seriously? 30 months without sex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    I'd be humping everything in sight by then.

    "Jesus, Jeff, have you ever noticed how supply the mass spectrometer sample port looks? Grab me some of that lithium grease. You know four weeks of getting off with the rubber folds of the remote arm manipulator have me really chaffed."

  34. Zero-g spot .. by Gopal.V · · Score: 1

    Though God help me for quoting a movie as a reference - it had a discussion about how married couples were considered more stable for long flights in space. Though they didn't say that married couples doing it in space was better.

    But apparently this is a serious problem - read the part about couple of russian astronauts made a pass at a canadian chick.

    There are real problems to dealt with, firstly the pulse rate is monitored. Secondly, you DO not want a prophylactic failure in space. More importantly you want your astronauts to actually concentrate on their work and not about who is doing who (high school style).

    There's only one kind of sexual release which doesn't include jealousy or partners as a standard component

    1. Re:Zero-g spot .. by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 1
      There's only one kind of sexual release which doesn't include jealousy or partners as a standard component

      And just how popular do you think that will make you in a zero gravity environment? Yeewwww!

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    2. Re:Zero-g spot .. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      There's only one kind of sexual release which doesn't include jealousy or partners as a standard component

      True. But are they really going to let them fire shotguns while they're on the shuttle?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    3. Re:Zero-g spot .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> There's only one kind of sexual release which doesn't include jealousy or partners as a standard component

      > True. But are they really going to let them fire shotguns while they're on the shuttle?

      What, are they letting ESR get on that mission??

  35. Power of Masturbation by courseB · · Score: 1
    Replace those negative feelings with love and you're halfway towards resolution of any conflict.
  36. /. to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take slashdotters. Problem solved.

  37. Time to sing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, give me a locus where the gravitons focus
    Where the three-body problem is solved,
    Where the microwaves play down at three degrees K,
    And the cold virus never evolved.
    (chorus)

    We eat algea pie, our vacuum is high,
    Our ball bearings are perfectly round.
    Our horizon is curved, our warheads are MIRVed,
    And a kilogram weighs half a pound.
    (chorus)

    If we run out of space for our burgeoning race
    No more Lebensraum left for the Mensch
    When we're ready to start, we can take Mars apart,
    If we just find a big enough wrench.
    (chorus)

    I'm sick of this place, it's just McDonald's in space,
    And living up here is a bore.
    Tell the shiggies, "Don't cry," they can kiss me goodbye
    'Cause I'm moving next week to L4!
    (chorus)

    CHORUS:
    Home, home on LaGrange,
    Where the space debris always collects,
    We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams:
    Solar power and zero-gee sex.

    --Home on Lagrange (The L5 Song)
    © 1978 by William S. Higgins and Barry D. Gehm

    1. Re:Time to sing! by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      That's the funniest thing I've read all week. Thanks a million!

      My only complaint: Hasn't been such a thing as degrees Kelvin since 1967.

    2. Re:Time to sing! by The+Nine · · Score: 1

      Actually, two complaints. It requires you to mispronounce Lagrange to get the full effect.

  38. Somewhat Surprised, Heinlein pointed this out... by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... in 'Stranger in a Strange Land.' I would have thought that the issues would have been well understood.

    I think it would also be understood that as long as you have a mixed gender group of people together for an extended period of time, there isn't a lot you can do to prevent it either.

    Valentine Smith.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  39. Yes, that makes so much sense . . . by millisa · · Score: 1

    See, I think I'd argue that they should be pushing for the exact opposite. I mean, honestly, if I had to spend 30 months with someone, I'd rather they'd be so into free love that chewbacca would get 'em going (and I mean, how can he not?).

    I'd rather have the sluttle shuttle rather than a no-fun-nun-run.

    Besides, just about *every* job disallows having sex at the office, it isn't like people who to do it don't ignore it anyways . . . Making rules that are just going to be ignored is stupid.

    1. Re:Yes, that makes so much sense . . . by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

      Besides, just about *every* job disallows having sex at the office, it isn't like people who to do it don't ignore it anyways . . . Making rules that are just going to be ignored is stupid.

      If you monitored your office mates heartrates 24-7, do you think that would change anything?

      Hmm. Looks like two people just decided to get an accelerated beat at the same time...

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    2. Re:Yes, that makes so much sense . . . by frizop · · Score: 1

      So what, people learn how to practice having sex with slow heart rates?

    3. Re:Yes, that makes so much sense . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the data, sir! The woman is clearly faking it.

  40. Meanwhile... by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...chunks of foam are still breaking off of the space shuttle and the heat shielding tiles need to be fixed via spacewalks. Fortunately, the agonizing decision as to whether astronauts should have sex has been laid to rest. Thank goodness, because I was beginning to think that NASA had lost its focus!

    Honestly, I'd tell this panel to go fsck themselves, but they can't now anyway... right?

  41. DVD vs. povpod.com for pr0n by Heembo · · Score: 1

    A DVD player is WAY to bulky for space - just get a video iPod and some povpod.com action!

    --
    Horns are really just a broken halo.
  42. Married couple by photonic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well at least one married couple has flown on the space shuttle. If an experiment was ever performed they would be the prime candidates, so go ask them.

    I also heard a story of a pair on a shuttle having a relation and getting married shortly after the flight. Apparently NASA wasn't told before and was not happy. (Might have been the same couple.) And of course the rumours that some Russkies sacrificed themselves for science. I can't find a reference for both stories unfortunately.

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    1. Re:Married couple by Teancum · · Score: 1

      NASA was totally pissed about this happening. They were single before being selected for the mission, but got married during the long hours and years of training for the mission. They didn't seek nor feel it was up to NASA to grant permission to get married, and NASA had to find out from their media relations office when a reporter asked a question about the couple being the first married couple to fly in space. By the time NASA officials in charge of flight assignments found out, it was too late into mission preparations to bring in a replacement, and besides, the crew was getting along just fine so the mission commander refused to budge on breaking up the team just a few weeks before the flight.

      The "official" reason NASA didn't want to have couples fly together on space missions wasn't space sex concerns, but a concern that if a shuttle blew up that it wouldn't wipe out an entire family at once. Kinda like why companies don't like their officers taking the same flights when traveling to business meetings. I worked for a company that refused to let two engineers take the same flight for fear of having the whole engineering department get taken out in a single plane crash or terrorist incident.

  43. What is worse by atlep · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What is worse than 30 months without sex? 30 months in a small closed environment, where others have sex, but you don't get any.

    Man, that would get me frustrated beyond reason. And the realisation of this is why I understand why NASA is doing this.

    Actually, 30 months without sex, I think I could do it if I were on such a mission. Because I would be mentally prepared for this. I know the other crewmembers are not having sex either. And the sex fixation in our siciety would not be there on a daily basis. Of course, I would expect periods of frustration. But I don't think it would be a major problem.

    When there is no potential for sex, when there is no constant reminder of sex around you, it is much easier to live without it. But if others in your crew are having sex, and you don't get any. That would really make things difficult.

    Of course, drugs that temporary kill libido would be very welcome too.

    1. Re:What is worse by www-xenu-dot-net · · Score: 1
      "And the sex fixation in our siciety would not be there on a daily basis."

      Hmm, let's see what you're writing in your article:

      "...without sex? ...have sex, ......30 months without sex, ...having sex ...sex fixation ...potential for sex, ...constant reminder of sex ...crew are having sex, ...libido..."

      Good thing all that goes away on a space mssion when you're strapped down 10 feet away from that gorgeous russian researcher chick (think Isabella Scorupco in James Bond, yeah) and the only words that must always be in the front of you're mind are "sex is forbidden". It's not like that mantra have ever caused any sex fixation in the US.

    2. Re:What is worse by NitsujTPU · · Score: 2, Funny

      60 months with out sex.

      It's called grad school. You don't have sleep either. I think that most of the scientists aboard such space missions are quite used to not getting laid, and the adaptation to life without sleep is probably beneficial in space as well.

    3. Re:What is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But if others in your crew are having sex, and you don't get any. That would really make things difficult.

      Exactly. This kind of thing runs deep down to the most primal level in our minds. Picture stags locking antlers for the right to knock boots with a female. I'm confident that a lot of us have had that nightmare where our girlfriend, or object of our affection, chooses another male (likely a close friend) after some sort of bizarre feather-spreading ritual and how it is anger-invoking, spirit-crushing and, ultimately, the worst feeling imaginable.

      It makes sense when you look at the differences between guys and gals when it comes to discussing sex. Women tend to be very frank and discuss a lot of aspects about masturbation and sex with their boyfriends quite openly. Men, on the other hand, tend to stick to the less threatening 'look at the tits on her', and on the few occasions when discussions turn to personal experiences, we only want to talk about our own. Everyone just parrots the same 'Guess what I did with Sarah last night' diatribes and it becomes a game of one-upmanship over a few beers. Your friend thinks you are listening to him, when in your mind you have your hands over your ears, saying 'LALALA NOT LISTENING' while trying to think of a better story to prove how virile and red blooded you are.

      On Slashdot, most of us have witnessed ACs attack posters on the grounds of their sex lives. Why is it that we judge success and validation almost soleley on the amount of physical partners? Why is it that many people would sacrifice or 'trade-it-all' for that bit more pussy? Refer to the Simpsons episode where Arty Ziff tells Homer that he is stinking rich, whereupon Homer retorts, 'Yet, you'd trade it all for one night with my wife' and Ziff agrees. We all find it funny, but is our laughter half agreement and harrowing realisation?

      So fast-forward to a space situation where you are very trapped and small in numbers. A sexual relationship would be a ticking time-bomb. Can you imagine a crew of two men and one woman, with a couple giggling between them and disappearing off to the 'bedroom', leaving poor old Joe No-fuck to man the controls? It doesn't matter if Joe is a cassnova with five women on the go back home, he will still feel ready to kill someone.

      We are all aware that in consumerism, sex sells (and predominantly to male buyers). However, if you look at the precise methods of using sex to sell a product, the advertisers make you believe that EVERYONE ELSE is having more sex than you, and all you need to fix that is to buy the product. Infact, the most explicit use of this tactic can be currently seen in the Lynx Deodorant advertisements that are given the slogan Spray More, Get More. These is practically the same as teasing a dog with a bone to train it into becoming loyal, and the vulnerability of a person's raw instincts mean that this practice is very effective.

      So I ask, as we head deeper into the 21st century where sex, celebrity, brand image, consumerism and self-improvement will remain or become ever more powerful, what will the effects be on an entire generation exposed to all these assaults? Or is this nothing new? Is it inescapable?

      In essence, both the grandparent's and my own posts can be summed up by a three minute flash video seen here

      -HM678

    4. Re:What is worse by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      So you are essentially saying that people are powerless fuck slaves who are totally dominated by their desires to get laid?

      Are you fucking serious? This is really your thesis in this post?

    5. Re:What is worse by dragonbutt · · Score: 1

      "Of course, I would expect periods of frustration"

      And by "frustration" do You mean "self service"?

      --
      it was like that when I got here.. I wasen't here when that happened... second shift musta done that....
    6. Re:What is worse by Genady · · Score: 1

      Of course, drugs that temporary kill libido would be very welcome too.

      Tell you what, if you get sent you can take my Mother-in-law along.

      --


      What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    7. Re:What is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People can stop taking their drugs. Castration is the only solution.
      3 castrated males and 3 frigid women. That should do the trick.

    8. Re:What is worse by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Isabella is Polish...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    9. Re:What is worse by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Good thing all that goes away on a space mssion when you're strapped down 10 feet away from that gorgeous russian researcher chick

      Have you seen the sort of women who go into space? They could turn straight men gay.

    10. Re:What is worse by darkfrog · · Score: 1

      you're a woman aren't you? ;-)

      --
      --DarkFrog
      If the dead rise again, we're going to have some serious population control issues.
    11. Re:What is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is worse than 30 months without sex? 30 months in a small closed environment, where others have sex, but you don't get any.

      So it's like college, then.

    12. Re:What is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 30 months without sex, I think I could do it if I were on such a mission. . . . I don't think it would be a major problem.

      Do not ever do this. You might get used to it. And that, I can tell you, IS a major problem.

    13. Re:What is worse by saihung · · Score: 1

      And this is why I got my MA in the humanities.

  44. Re:Somewhat Surprised, Heinlein pointed this out.. by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

    Thankyou! As soon as I saw the article I thought 'Stranger in a Strange Land' had this covered...

    Glad I'm not the only one ;)

    --
    Baka Drew
  45. No matter how weird things get... by Adammil2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter how weird things get, the air will clear when ground control calls to remind the crew, "if you miss the timing on this deorbit burn, you're all going to burn to death."

    No Earth-based station simulation is going to completely capture the urgency of real space travel.

  46. The answer is obvious... by 26199 · · Score: 1

    ...and will provide lucrative funding, too.

    "And now, live from the Big Brother Space Capsule..."

  47. Good Move.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because currently it's a pain in the arse....

  48. ObHeinlein by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1
    On a mission to Mars, for example, which would take up to 30 months, sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew functioning'."

    ...and the birth of Valentine Michael Smith.

    1. Re:ObHeinlein by Shipwack · · Score: 1

      We should be so lucky...

  49. Obligatory: by Draconix · · Score: 1

    (Link Not Work/Children Safe) The real reason they're putting a stop to it.

    --
    By reading this you acknowledge that you have read it.
  50. You ARE an alien. by The+Great+Wazzoo · · Score: 1

    If someone gives birth in space, would the child classify as an alien?

  51. No Sex, Need to rely on other means ... by oztiks · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA said no sex with fellow crew members, so i guess they'll be flying about in the hope that some UFO comes find them to give a good old probing!

  52. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Space sex?!? I can't even get Earth Sex!

  53. NASA wrong again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sex and romance have been proven essential for crews in isolation as almost every professional psychologist agrees and there are numerous studies. NASA is making one mistake after the other lately. At least for manned missions this agency will be replaced within the next 5-10 years.

  54. 30 month missions by vistic · · Score: 1

    Also during a 30 month mission, a baby could be carried to full term... which is another mouth to feed... and a strain on the food rations.

    And who knows what complications there could be for the baby, being born in 0G?

    1. Re:30 month missions by demon · · Score: 1

      Also, even if the birth was (relatively) complication-free, reaching full-term in zero-G might make it fatal for a baby to return to Earth-level gravity. That would be a bitter pill to swallow, indeed.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  55. Conspiracy... by frostilicus2 · · Score: 1

    I have a conspiracy theory:
    The first man on mars will be British
    The reason?
    They're the only ones who will drink the bromine tea.



    (sorry about the bad link...)

    --
    Nothing sucks like a Vax, nothing blows like a PowerMac G4
  56. NAS not NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    article says NAS reporting on report by NASA
    that A is important peoples

  57. Polyamorous family crew by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

    So put a polyamorous family crew on board that are already all having sex with each other without fidelty problems.

    1. Re:Polyamorous family crew by nowhere.elysium · · Score: 1

      yeah, but do you really want a bunch of inbreeds pioneering the first colonisation of a different planet? thought not.

      --
      http://xkcd.com/313/
    2. Re:Polyamorous family crew by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about them sharing genes?

  58. Star Trek as a model for a Mars Trip by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're forgetting the pilot and first officer of Serenity.
    (You know, that blonde geeky guy and the hot chick from Cleopatra 2525.)
    They're married and get it on regularly (it seems), but the only conflict that I've seen them have is that he sometimes gets jealous of the relationship between his wife and the captain, and she wants a kid but he doesn't.
    Also, Serenity is a small ship with a small crew, and no holodeck, replicators, or transporters.

    All in all, Firefly seems to be a much closer match to what an actual Mars mission would be like, in terms of technology and the size of the ship and crew, than the various Star Trek scenarios.

    Well, except for the artificial gravity.

    And the hooker.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    1. Re:Star Trek as a model for a Mars Trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should put that all in the past tense, Wash was tragically killed by the Revers.

      You ahould put that in the future tense, as he hasnt been born yet.

    2. Re:Star Trek as a model for a Mars Trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the hooker.

      You mean "companion."

  59. Only way to keep it sexless by Belseth · · Score: 1

    If they want a sexless crew does this mean they'll all be conservative Republicans?

    1. Re:Only way to keep it sexless by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Conservative Republicans are almost all repressed nymphomaniacs. it would be a bomb waiting to explode, and since they wouldn't abort and probably wouldnt use contraception... well... you can only imagine what you would find when the ship came back to earth.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  60. Parent is fucking GOATSE redir! MOD DOWN AS TROLL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that an astronaught trying to invite sex from his team-mates? Disgusting!

  61. Gives a whole new meaning . . . by ln+-sf+head+ass · · Score: 1

    . . . to "In space, no one can hear you scream."

  62. Just take a stable polyamorous group... by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Noone feels left out and if they've lived together for years before on earth there's no reason to assume they're going to break down during flight either.
    I'm completely serious btw.

    1. Re:Just take a stable polyamorous group... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...there's no reason to assume they're going to break down during flight...

      ESR claims to be polyamorous but I'd think a crew with guys like him would fall somewhat short of "stable".

  63. More proof that nasa management is by maric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    hopelessly flawed. First they missmanage and over use an inefficiant air/spaceframe design. During which they get two crews killed needlessly. They have ignored repeated warnings from the manufacturer on one incident. They lose/destroy multiple multimillion dollar probes. Commission needless studies that in this case even duplicate earlier efforts. And just when I think that they have run out of stupidity they start the magnum project, and pursue hyper x as space transport.

    The magnum project is supposed to provide a mars launch vehicle. It was estimated that the crew to mars would need approx 100 tons to be launched. Magnum is slated to lift far less than that requiring a slow and expensive orbital assembly period. Meanwhile the Russians have a nice reusable space vehicle called Energia. In its Vulcan config it can lift up to 175 tons and has been sucessfully launched with a good safety record (so far). But nasa cant be bothered with existing tech that works - we need expensive and buggy tech instead.

    Hyper x - now it is a wonderfull device and I have great respect for it. It is just not what nasa is selling it to be. They claim it will be a space plane that will not use a rocket and fly at high speeds and even into orbit. Just one problem - SCRAM jets need a supersonic air flow at the intake and through the engine to even work. You just do not get that at subsonic speeds. The test data that I have seen thus far indicates that they have not even had it work below mach 5 yet and it needs to be boosted to speed by a pegasus rocket. Hyper x makes more sense as a return craft where speed can be a "bit" more easy to come by.

    The really sad thing is that there are real high quality people working for nasa that are getting painted with an ugly brush here. Nasa has made wonderful contributions to military,comercial, and general aviation in the areas of new materials. wind tunnel research, new safety systems, new avionics systems, manuverability studies and developments, aircraft design and testing and many more. These hard working people are doing many things that are improving the world arround us and no one is talking about it. Instead we all sit back and notice what the PHBs that they are saddled with go on to the next idiotic stunt. Nasa needs new management from the top down, a swift kick, some better media coverage, LOTS more money - with a better oversite to make sure that it gets used intelligently, and support from the government and the average citizen - in that order. If they dont get all of that stuff soon they will become totally irrelevent. Which, in light of their tremendous achievements to date(Apollo 11 for one), and their enormous potential, would be a terrible loss.

    1. Re:More proof that nasa management is by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      hopelessly flawed. First they missmanage and over use an inefficiant air/spaceframe design. During which they get two crews killed needlessly.

      Blame the air force and a lack of budget for that one.

      Meanwhile the Russians have a nice reusable space vehicle called Energia. In its Vulcan config it can lift up to 175 tons and has been sucessfully launched with a good safety record (so far).

      You mean the one which was sent up TWICE, and only managed to get something into orbit once. Yeah, great and extensive track record there, yup. Not to mention that there are no remaining energia rockets, they've all rotted away. I mean the last companion Buran Shuttle died a few years ago when the roof of its storage building caved in.

      It'd be cheaper, and safer, to simply modify the shuttle tanks/booster rockets to fulfill a similar role of which there has been some talk.

      But nasa cant be bothered with existing tech that works

      See above.

    2. Re:More proof that nasa management is by O2H2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      First of all NASA doesn't need any more money. They have shown with their latest exploration architecture that they have no notion of how to control expenditures and just giving them more money will not result in a better product. In fact, given the results of Mr Griffin's "study" of exploration architectures, it is amply clear that more money will result in a worse product. He couldn't have chosen a more expensive, risk-intensive and unreliable way to go to orbit- much less to the moon and Mars.

      This is not an organization guided by logic and reasoning and a clear understanding of limits to dollars and technology. Only minor sections of it understand the benefits of small linked successful steps. Especially at its headquarters it is infatuated with the big new thing, the silver bullet solution done by fiat- at any cost. Of course historically this has led to crummy solutions that you could hardly pay more for. And worst of all it is intensively guided by the perverted politics and the sophomoric thinking of a egomaniacal newbie leader. God help you if you cross Griffin. His shit list is long and well used.

      The sort of thinking in this report from NASA shows just how far away they are from realizing any true vision of exploration. You cannot explore efficiently with six or even a dozen crew. You will need at least two dozen to be more effective than simple robotic exploration and I would argue far more (on the order of 90) to be effective enough to justify the tens of billions in excess investment.

      Assuming that a crew will perform like robots for anything over a few weeks while doing anything risky is nonsensical. Sitting in a can at ISS does not fall in this category. There is no real perceived risk there. Exploration means getting that space suit dirty. Having to rely on non-pristine gear that may have been abused by the previous user. There will be no one looking over your shoulder on Mars. If there are any actual people on the mission they are going to form relationships- whether mission control likes it or not. The dynamics of these relationships are unpredictable but are not necessarily a source of evil. In fact the opposite can be argued. A successful plan is not to ignore the problem and wish it away and end up with piss-poor ad hoc solutions but to think through the whole thing. This will mean that your crew selection parameters will have to change. A collection of neo-con prudes, or those with hair trigger jealously-induced violent streaks will probably not be the optimal solution.

      For NASA to be even pondering this is a total waste of time and money at this stage. There is not enough money to complete (or even really start) the preposterous exploration vision given the present fiscal situation, the grossly inefficient architecture and typical programmatic cost ballooning that we have seen historically with NASA. Sad to say but they are going NOWHERE with the present plans. Squandering resources ( ie my tax money ) on this sort of fluff is an insult to the taxpayer- expecially given the quality of the work.

      BTW you don't need to go to the Russians to get a decent heavy lift system for exploration. Especially a fossilized model like the Energia. They can be made right here in the US which is where the best new work on launch vehicles has been done. Unfortunately NASA has systematically removed these most competent teams from consideration in their thinking. When you insist that an untried and untested team are your first stringers you know what you get? Yep - a second-rate solution.

    3. Re:More proof that nasa management is by maric · · Score: 1

      Your statements about the nasa management is preaching to the choir - I am in agreement - hence why I said they were hopeless. Any additional funding would have to come AFTER a total management replacement and an effective oversight commitee was put into place.

      As for the Russians vs Good ole America: sorry, but the best we got pushes 15 tons - 20 tons max avg and 25 tons max. there may be a rocket that we have that pushes 50 tons (but I dont have, and did not find any data in regards to that - sorry). quite a bit shy of the Energia at 175 tons in vulcan format

      -this bit is a combo reply - as for Energia being a fossil - its younger than both the atlas and the shuttle. yes I know that buran got crushed, Youll note that I said Energia, not Buran. I also said Energia in vulcan config - which if you look it up you would find that in that config the buran would not fit on the craft. you would also find that the buran was simply cargo to the Energia. Energia does not need the buran at all. As for un tried/tested, I said "(so far)" meaning that it did not have a lot of launches atm. However if you look into it - there are a lot of successfull launches of the technology it has from Baiknor (SP?) and that Boeing Sea launch uses alot of the side boosters as a solo launch vehicle - reasons: safty - not a lot of explostions, efficiency - the russians currently have the most powerfull/most efficiant rocket motors in the world - and even the idiot nasa management took notice of that.

      go ahead call energia bad things and reject it - youll make wonderfull nasa management material and help keep us off of mars for the forseeable future.

    4. Re:More proof that nasa management is by O2H2 · · Score: 1
      I totally agree with you about Russian engines- that is why they are used on the Atlas V. Which, BTW, is a much newer design than the Energia- by a couple decades. As for Russian rockets- some US design teams do a better job. You are correct that there is no existing rocket that can lift 50t to LEO. This does not mean that they are not in development.

      An Atlas HLV can lift 29 tons to LEO.

      Take that HLV, modify upper stage diameter to match the present payload fairing and have a 70t propellant capacity, add 4 RL-10 engines ( plenty of space now) and you are in excess of 40t.

      Change Booster diameter to match upper stage- add an RD-180 engine,increase propellant load to match . Without solids or strap-ons you are at 30t, add solids you are at 45t+.

      Combine three such dual RD-180 boosters in an HLV configuration (a stack physically smaller than present Delta IV heavy) and the 70t upper stage and you are at 75t to LEO. Add two more boosters and you are at 120t. Add two more you are at 140t

      How much effort/risk did this require? No new engines, two new tanks, go-do level mechanical design. Compare that to the ESAS architecture with its multiple new propulsion systems, huge tanks and drastic launch complex changes. The Energia was also a super-complex thing with all sorts of engines, multiple stages etc. From what I gather it had 88t to LEO capability. Mediocre for such complexity and cost. The 175 tons you describe has even more complexity. More importantly it has only one use- a Mars rocket. Single use means sky-high costs and terrible reliability. You must pick a sysytem that has commercial viability and also can be scaled to support the exploration needs. Doing only one is a Saturn solution- a dead end.

      In an efficient architecture you can use two of those Atlas-derived 75t vehicles to place in excess of 5t of science mass on the lunar surface on the first mission. Not the lander or ascent stage masses- those are extraneous and should not be counted- just the consumables, humans and machines to make real exploratory and scientific progress. Subsequent missions can deliver even more. Since the cost of these machines is probably less than a third of the ESAS hardware you can fly three times as often. That makes costs even lower as rates rise.

      Recognize that the centroid of optimal vehicle design does not reside within NASA any more- it is in industry. Optimal includes safest and most reliable too. When the budgets get pinched and NASA starts talking about how they can't go to the moon any more- remember- there are other solutions that are cheaper and better. Hundreds of people at NASA know about these alternatives and have been silenced. Don't despair of going to Mars or the moon because we can't afford the horrid ESAS archtecture. You just have to call the right people.

  64. No Sex in Space? by PTK502 · · Score: 1

    Havent they heard of the Pill

  65. Re:In space, ...James Bond didn't find it that way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you remember...

    "I believe he's attempting re-entry"

  66. Parent is lying. GP is fine. by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

    See title.

    --
    Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
  67. Anaphrodisiac by ishnaf · · Score: 1

    All you need is a cardboard cutout of Rosanne.

  68. Doesn't NASA have better things to worry about? by borgheron · · Score: 1

    Such as making the shuttle safer or possibly creating a replacement system? Is this what NASA worries about?

    GJC

    --
    Gregory Casamento
    ## Chief Maintainer for GNUstep
  69. Re:Somewhat Surprised, Heinlein pointed this out.. by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1

    No, you're not. ;)

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  70. Go for Swingers - works every time by grantdh · · Score: 1

    Damn, where's the problem - just populate the ship with a collection of "swinger" couples - they'll bonk their partners AND the others no problem.

    Thus, everyone's getting it, there's none of that monogomous bullshit to get in the way (when the invetible "I like you're partner, dude!" happens) and so sex is just natural and fun. Wooo hoo.

    Of course, getting them to do any science, stay focussed, etc - well - that could be tricky....

    Mission Control: "Hey guys, it's time to do the orbital approach manouver.... Hey guys... Awww come on you lot, quit that.... Are we going to have to turn off the jacuzi again????" :)

    --

    I left my body to science, but I'm afraid they've turned it down...
  71. It's *not* fine if you have Javascript enabled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Article has the old <script>window.location="http://goatse.ca/";</scri pt> .


    This sends you to the "smiling man" if you're unfortunate enough to visit the site with Javascript enabled. One more reason not to use Javascript!

    1. Re:It's *not* fine if you have Javascript enabled! by JNighthawk · · Score: 1

      Okay, that's really freaking weird. I went to it just fine earlier and got no redirect. What's up with that site?

      --
      Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.
    2. Re:It's *not* fine if you have Javascript enabled! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original article was about a Kansas abortion doctor accused on trial for eating fetuses. Clearly one of the doctor's friends has hacked WND and inserted a goatse redirection in the page source. Just turn off javascript.

  72. Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos. If they really expect people to go 30 months without sex then they should provide medication that will reduce their sex drive. Even then you have basic human emotional needs which sex plays a part of so people would still probably have sex. Trying to go without sex will cause more problems than just planning for sex.

    Send them up half male and half female with orders that they need to rotate partners on a daily basis. Well laid people with multiple partners they aren't previously attached to are less likely to get into jealous rages or similar problems. Expecting them to go without for 30 months is foolish and choosing to ignore the problem will work just about as well as not providing sex ed to horny highschool kids. These people are astronauts and know their lifes depend on working together. If they can't work together even when they hate each other (or worse - love each other) then they shouldn't be sent up.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      "Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos."

      You don't have kids, do you? :)

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    2. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by peeping_Thomist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos.

      If you're telling the truth about this, then your brain is already in a continual fit of chaos.

      --
      Anything worth doing is worth doing badly -- G.K. Chesterton
    3. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by j3ffy · · Score: 1

      Huh huh, "Well laid people with multiple partners" is redundant now isn't it?

      I'd hope that the instinct of survival would prevent lovers' spats from having disaterous effects.

    4. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by kilodelta · · Score: 1

      If we in the United States didn't have such a twisted, puritanical mindset your plan would work.

      But this runs completely counter to Christian Fundamentalism at play in the U.S. now. Swapping sexual partners is the ultimate of baddies.

      Of course the only reason sexual fidelity is pushed so much is because of property inheritance issues. I mean, who'd want to find out that the son they thought they had was a little bastard and let that little bastard inheret what you'd work for?

      So there are root problems that have to be addressed. As initial reading I'd suggest Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land". Granted, the book is a little on the fantasy side but the problems presented aren't.

    5. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If they really expect people to go 30 months without sex then they should provide medication that will reduce their sex drive.

      Pfeh. I went to a university where there were more men named "Dave" than women in pretty much all of my classes. Thirty months is nothing.

      Not that I want to go back to that life...

      Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos

      Just out of curiousity, what do you do if you have to go on a business trip for a week? Get a hooker?

    6. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. If he has kids then his brain is already in a fit of chaos anyway.

    7. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Snocone · · Score: 1

      I'd hope that the instinct of survival would prevent lovers' spats from having disaterous effects.

      Heh. Well, I've been on some mountaineering expeditions that were considerably more of a risk to the participants' lives than any NASA-funded well-researched thought-of-everything doublechecked-over-and-over mission to Mars would be, with pretty much exactly the same chance of being rescued from the trackless wilderness if anything serious went wrong as you would have on Mars ... ... and I can *assure* you that lovers' spats will override even the most basic primal survival common sense.

      "... uh, guys, the snow is moving, get us to rocks I can hold on to THEN you can scream at each other..."

      So I dunno. I think I might be kinda with NASA on this one.

    8. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three Days? The hell of a sex drive do you have?

      Sorry, but sex does not play a part of human emotions. It is something that's more or less overhyped.

      I'll probably get modded -1, Flamebait for this, but oh well.

    9. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Well, here's a question, though... what's wrong with masturbation? It works to relieve the sexual tension, and it obviously won't cause any crew conflicts if done discreetly. Even more, I'd expect that these things be discussed with the astronauts in advance, too, so they'd probably know that the others are masturbating to relieve their tension, which would make it even more of a non-event - you're not offended because the others are eating and breathing, either.

      That being said, I'm not sure that rotating partners is a good idea. It sounds good in theory, admittedly, but not everyone's wired to be able to do that without eventually becoming attached to one of the others and being jealous when the rest of the crew's doing him/her, too. And what's worse, how do you find out whether someone's able to handle that beforehand? Sure, you could do a dry run, so to speak, but somehow I don't think NASA would get funding for that...

      No, I definitely think masturbation is the way to go.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    10. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Expecting them to go without for 30 months is foolish and choosing to ignore the problem will work just about as well as not providing sex ed to horny highschool kids.

      I believe this is true. Humans are going to have sex with each other, whether or not you tell them not to, whether or not you educate them, or even if they are of the same sex. Sex is a part of our physiology, and is integrated into our systems -- we're supposed to screw, and often! It's healthy!

      Also, I've noticed that polyamorism is starting to be more accepted in our society, though it is still taboo to most of the population. It IS difficult to juggle relationships, because jealousy is also a part of our sexual behavior, I think.

      I think allowing humans to have sex on such a journey, to pacify sex drive, would produce a happier crew.

      Though, as someone else above had stated, having cameras onboard, and turning the footage into a reality TV show, may be another way to fund similar space ventures. I would certainly give-up my privacy for an opportunity to go to Mars.

      Now all we need is to drop the taboo with marijuana on space missions...

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    11. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by glaucopis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Send them up half male and half female with orders that they need to rotate partners on a daily basis. Well laid people with multiple partners they aren't previously attached to are less likely to get into jealous rages or similar problems.

      How would mandatory daily sex be any better than forbidden sex? What if you're gay -- can you turn down partners of the other sex? Or, despite your qualifications, do you not get to go on the mission at all, since it's unlikely you'd get provided with more than one other gay partner in the article's 6-8 member crew? What if you're straight and just aren't attracted to a particular member of the opposite sex -- do you get to turn them down, too? Are you going to carefully choose four attractive straight men and four attractive straight women for your mission and hope that none of them realizes mid-journey that they're actually interested in someone of the same sex and messes your little rotations up? You really think mandating sex will be less disruptive than forbidding it or just letting it happen on its own?

      These people are astronauts and know their lifes depend on working together. If they can't work together even when they hate each other (or worse - love each other) then they shouldn't be sent up.

      Exactly. They're highly trained intelligent adults; there shouldn't be any need for either sex bans or your solution. They should be tested for their ability to peacefully coexist with a small group of people for sustained periods of time before they're chosen for the mission, since this is a key requirement for their job, and then trusted to live up to their training. Someone who's prone to jealous rages shouldn't be sent, regardless of their overall brilliance. Other than that, as long as the group regularly voices its concerns and deals with them, I fail to see what the problem of space relationships would be.

    12. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1
      Send them up half male and half female with orders that they need to rotate partners on a daily basis.

      Call me old-fashioned (at 30), but... this is a joke, right? Space mission != sex camp.

    13. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos.

      Aw, you stud! Seriously, I don't know if your bragging about your extraordinary sex drive is just pathetic or scary.

      Send them up half male and half female with orders that they need to rotate partners on a daily basis.

      If you're actually being serious about this, you watch waaay too much porn. In real life, government agencies do not "order" people to have sex with people not of their chosing. But thanks for playing, sicko.

    14. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Call me old-fashioned (at 30), but... this is a joke, right? Space mission != sex camp.

      Quiet you! You'll ruin our plans! How else do you expect hopeful astronaut nerds to get laid we more than one woman in a years time!

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    15. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Three days is more than I can usually handle without my brain going into a fit of chaos. If they really expect people to go 30 months without sex then they should provide medication that will reduce their sex drive. Even then you have basic human emotional needs which sex plays a part of so people would still probably have sex.

      That's a load of crap. Many people (especially me) go for years, even decades without sex, and they get by fine. If you can't last 30 months without sticking your dick into something then you really do have problems.

    16. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think jealousy is an evolutionary strategy which isn't nearly as applicable today as it was for our hunter-gatherer ancestors. The male doesn't want the female screwing around, because if she does, then she might be carrying somebody else's baby, and any investment of resources made in that baby will therefore be ineffective in promoting the male's genes. Meanwhile the female doesn't want the male screwing around, because he might end up falling for some other woman, and therefore won't stick around to help raise his child, which means it's less likely that the child will survive to reproduce her genes.

      That, in a nutshell, is why evolution endowed us with the sense of jealousy: because those who are most likely to reproduce are those who adopt the tactics that maximize effective procreation. It sound terribly dry and unromantic, and from evolution's perspective, it really is. The rush of orgasm, the feeling of bonding with your partner, and the mesmerizing beauty of the opposite sex are all just cunning ploys to keep us behaving in evolutionarily successful ways.

      But our goals and evolution's goals aren't the same. Evolution wasn't planning ahead when it stumbled on the idea of giving us big brains, with their powers of introspection and imagination. Evolution will continue telling us to screw like rabbits long after we've created more people than our resources can manage to keep healthy and happy. Evolution is continuing to make us jealously mindful of each others' sexuality even in the age of effective contraception and paternity tests. In short, evolution hasn't prepared us for the world we live in. So as powerful and innate as some of these emotions may be, we need to second-guess what they might tell us to do.

      But rather than being introspective about the causes of sexuality, sexual jealousy, and coming up with new strategies to maximize pleasure and minimize pain, most people are happy to simply turn their critical thinking skills over to one religious creed or another. Marital fidelity isn't just a useful strategy for those who choose it; it becomes God's One True Sexual Arrangement, and any deviation from it--even if freely chosen by the deviators and their partners--is Heresy, Sin, Satanic, and possibly even Liberal. I'm perfectly accepting of those who choose "one man, one woman, till death do us part", but I'm against those who not only choose that lifestyle without thinking, but demand that everyone else choose it without thinking as well. Society has codified that system into law already, and they fight tooth and nail against even the most sensible expansions of the definition of marriage (gay marriage, for example).

      I say, if a group of nine women and seven men can all share a big house, rotate partners, talk out their jealousies and insecurities, and all climb into one big bed at night without disturbing each other with their snoring, then let them.

      Oh, yeah: Legalize marijuana!

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    17. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying you never masturbate? You arn't the rule, you are the exception. Statistically on average most men age 18 - 40 don't go a single day without masturbating at least once. Yes its true. Google for the sex study stats, there out there.

    18. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm.... masturbation != sex

    19. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Well, here's a question, though... what's wrong with masturbation?... I definitely think masturbation is the way to go."

      Now there's a Slashdot post if ever I've seen one.

    20. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any evidence to back that up? Or are you just a moron who doesn't think before speaking?

    21. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      > Now all we need is to drop the taboo with marijuana on space missions...

      But not smoked (they can make brownies by the ton), for a few reasons:

      1. Smoke gets everywhere, no matter what it's from. Ever cleaned a smoker's computer? Pot smoke isn't as thick and hopefully there wouldn't be as much of it as there would be with tobacco, but you will still have particulates attaching to everything in sight.

      2. Secondhand smoke, and the smell. Not everyone likes these.

      3. Fires on a ship in general. You're not going to set your bed on fire if you fall asleep with a brownie.

      Oxygen consumption from a burning bowl or joint may or may not be a factor, if everyone is doing it. Even without this, I think the three reasons above are adequate for banning smoking, period, on board the mission.

      Now if they have some sort of plans to colonize, as opposed to just visit, hemp seems like a very likely candidate to grow in a colony. It likes growing in a hydroponic environment, it can be grown to a more or less arbitrary size, and it's easy to control whether it's growing or flowering (continuous light, or 12 on and 12 off -- that's all it takes). Why not let it be THC-bearing so the crew can consume the byproducts?

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    22. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Nope, got a gf. Not a problem.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    23. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Masturbation might clear year head for an hour or two. Sex can give you a day or two. Also masturbation doesn't fulfill any emotional needs. I think sex is more practical.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    24. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Dude, where's my spaceship? Hot chicks, drugs, weird happenings, and outer space. Sounds like Red Dwarf. Gotta love British comedy.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    25. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd say to pick all bisexual people. I think in that kind of limited situation almost everyone would turn bi if encouraged a little. Encouraging sex would be just a part of encouraging general health. You wouldn't tell astronauts to just wing it when it comes to their fitness program and eatting habits so why would you for their sex habits?

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    26. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      You might think you get by fine but it's unlikely. Hormones are mind altering chemicals. Unless you have some sort of damage to your system. My experience is that horniness is more damaging to your mental activity than drinking or using minor drugs (smoking, pot, caffine, over-the-counter meds, etc).

      If you've gone decades without sex then no wonder you're so grumpy. Go get some. It isn't that hard. Heck, here in Nevada prostitution is legal if you get really desperate.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    27. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Rotation is the best way to make sure everyone gets some, doesn't get bored with their partner, and reduces any chances of cheating or sexual jealousy. You could just encourage a general orgy atmosphere too I guess.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    28. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My experience is that horniness is more damaging to your mental activity than drinking or using minor drugs (smoking, pot, caffine, over-the-counter meds, etc).

      Then you have some serious mental problems...

    29. Re:Sex is an important part of life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think in that kind of limited situation almost everyone would turn bi if encouraged a little

      This is really no more true than all of those Christian crackpots that talk about "curing" homosexuality.

      You wouldn't tell astronauts to just wing it when it comes to their fitness program and eatting habits so why would you for their sex habits?

      Probably because sex is simply not a need in the same way food, air and exercise is. There are very specific physical consequences to not having food, being weightless and so on, but not with sex. While some people do go nuts without it, it isn't something that is universal to everybody. There are plenty of people (especially here on /.) that live very productive lives without sex, whether by choice or not.

      If you personally are someone that "goes nuts" after not having sex for three days (what do you do if you are on a two-week business trip?), then I guess that should disqualify you from being an astronaut.

  73. Simpler solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send two married men, their wives, and a baby per couple. I guarantee no sex will occur.

  74. Eunuchs by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why not just send a bunch of eunuchs? They can even bring along their own operating system.

    1. Re:Eunuchs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's some funny shit. I never realised how much "UNIX" sounds like "eunuchs".

  75. Precedent & A Modest Proposal by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Well, gosh, there's pretty much the same rules in the military, and they do just fine.

    Right?

    *crickets*

    No, really, I kid, I kid. But...

    Seeing how you can now buy your way onto an official mission, why not the rest of the crew pony up the money to pay the way for - hmmm - how can I put this - oh, I dunno - let's call them a "companion" - heck, you could even have them in their own isolable / detachable - oh, I dunnno - "shuttle" in case things got too weird. Triple check with the folks in Nevada, but Joss^H^H^H^H NASA may have solved their own problem.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  76. 30 months by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We welcome to Earth the first man born off world. Michael Valentine Smith.

  77. Yeah, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if I were married to your wife, I would recommend it. (just had to be said :) ).

  78. Submarines by m50d · · Score: 1

    Last time this came up there was a submariner who gave a pretty insightful description of what has happened since crews went mixed. The time periods are not quite as long (iirc 6 months at a time), but it still gives insight into what happens when a group of people are stuck in a confined space for a long time.

    --
    I am trolling
    1. Re:Submarines by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 1

      So where's tehe insightful description?

    2. Re:Submarines by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1
      This is /. pal. You don't just come in here hinting at sexual situations as some sort of teaser. This is as close to the real thing as some of us will ever get.

      Now, details, man!

  79. Make Space Sex Another Science Project! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    study orgasms, body chemistry, and reproduction in space....it would shure make the trip more interesting!

  80. Ben Bova's Mars. by doobie · · Score: 1

    'nuff said.

  81. Where Slashdot threads have gone before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (what NASA will do if it decides to send George Bus^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H a moneky along with the human crew is anyones guess)

    Ah, yes, it just wouldn't be a proper Slashdot thread with the totally inane and unnecessary Bush bashing just to (try to) prove to the rest of the /. community that you're politically astute, would it?

    I guess that I'd better post this as AC. We all know how anti-anti-Bush posts get modded into oblivion by the "still pissed that Gore and Kerry lost" Slashdot mods.

    Maybe if I put in an unnecessary Cheney insult I can sooth the ire of /. mods, though.** clearing throat ** Let's send Dick Cheney up instead. At least then if two of the crew start to get involved in some hanky-panky, he will intervene by telling them to "Go fu*k yourselves", which he has a penchant for doing.

    1. Re:Where Slashdot threads have gone before by secolactico · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, yes, it just wouldn't be a proper Slashdot thread with the totally inane and unnecessary Bush bashing just to (try to) prove to the rest of the /. community that you're politically astute, would it?

      It still isn't a proper Slashdot thread. It's missing a pointless computers/cars comparison.

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:Where Slashdot threads have gone before by tonywong · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's the whole point of this discussion... whether bush bashing in space is necessary or not.

      Thank you, I'll be here the rest of the day. Make sure to tip your waitress.

    3. Re:Where Slashdot threads have gone before by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, calling this a proper Slashdot thread is like trying to drive down the freeway without an engine in the car.

      That wasn't very good. I apologize.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  82. Fine, let's give it all to the Russians, then... by Hosiah · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If we're actually going to hold back the most ambitious achievement of human history based on some Dark Ages puritanism, lets just sell the shuttle to France or some damn thing and forget about science, period. I mean, how are they planning to enforce this? Lock chastity belts on the astronauts before they launch? And did they get the idea that sex and space travel don't mix from seeing that episode where Spock flipped out during "pon farr"?

    How did the nation that BUILT the space shuttle get THIS stupid THIS fast? I want my tax dollars back!

  83. And don't forget Troi and Worf... by s-gen · · Score: 1

    ...who seemed to be at it in all the bad timelines:

    PICARD: "Computer, locate Leutenant Worf"
    COMPUTER: "Leutenant Worf is in the bath with Leutenant Troi"
    PICARD: "Red Alert! And run a full sweep for chronoton particles..."

  84. zero-g spot... by rungood · · Score: 1

    such comedy...

  85. Sex is like air by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    It's only an issue when you're not getting any.

  86. The elegant solution by spidergoat2 · · Score: 1

    ...would be the development of the Orgasmatron, as used by Woody Allen in 'Sleeper'. The NASA solution will probably be to send some sheep and vibrators on missions.

  87. sex toys? by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

    Perhaps NASA should investigate other ways for astronauts to "relieve" themselves on these missions then. They should look at http://www.realdoll.com/Real Doll (not work safe) and other sexual outlets instead. While it might seem far fetched, during WW2, Hitler was looking at sex dolls as well as an outlet for soliders on the battlefields. While his interests were different (he was more worried of his soliders catching STD's from foreign prostitutes), it still was an approach to meet the sexual needs of his soliders so they would be in peak performance.

  88. Re:Somewhat Surprised, Heinlein pointed this out.. by The+Monster · · Score: 1

    Looks like several of us. Or do you and I count as the same person?

    --

    [100% ISO 646 Compliant]
    SVM, ERGO MONSTRO.

  89. Send in the porn stars by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Train Ron Jeremy, Amber Lynn and a host of other porn stars to be astronauts.
    They could have sex all the time, they wouldn't care who's fucking who.
    and with all the montoring of the crew, NASA could podcast the whole thing
    as pay-per-view porn and make some money back from the failed polar lander attempt.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  90. Re:Fine, let's give it all to the Russians, then.. by Tidal+Flame · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be fair, it's not "Dark Ages puritanism" - it's more like not mixing work and personal life. There are a number of ways in which sex in space could make interaction between crew members very awkward, which would in turn make the whole crew less efficient, which could be dangerous and costly. Plus, can you imagine what would happen if whatever method of birth control they're using failed? Hopefully they'd be smart enough to get permenantly sterilized before trying something like that, but if not it could be a serious problem.

    That said, I don't know how they'd enforce it either.

  91. Everyone at nasa should read..... by K_Bomb · · Score: 1

    Mars and Return to Mars by Ben Bova... These 2 novels deal with the trip to mars, and as much as those who sent the scientist's and astronauts/cosmonauts didnt want them having sex, it happened anyways...

    Its like telling a child they cannot have a cookie... they just want it that much more after you tell them

  92. The only thing sexier than SPACE SEX by defile · · Score: 4, Funny

    is FORBIDDEN space sex

    1. Re:The only thing sexier than SPACE SEX by earthbound+kid · · Score: 1

      It's just like the old saying, "Once you outlaw forbidden space sex, then only criminals will have forbidden space sex." Or, "Forbidden space sex doesn't kill people; people so engrossed in forbidden space sex that they botch their mission kills people."

    2. Re:The only thing sexier than SPACE SEX by David's+Boy+Toy · · Score: 1

      Imagine the porno .mpeg files coming back. The entire crew taking getting really bored and deciding to see what a space orgy is like.

      Personally I think we need a crew of bisexuals which are very non jealous and will happily all have sex together. People would never get bored! Orgies are great for moral. I still give guys on the street of nice hug even a few years after we ended up in the same orgy together. Sex is a great stress relief expecially when your stuck in a cramped space ship.

      S&M is a great way to build the sense of trust and responsibility needed for a mission to mars. If you don't trust someone enough to bottom to them, you certainly don't trust them enough to go to mars with them.

  93. I thought the problem had already been solved by Radical+Rad · · Score: 1

    ...by this guy. Snip, snip.

  94. those who ignore the past... by airdrummer · · Score: 0

    military/naval culture evolved over the millennia into its sexist, homophobic state for exactly this reason (alexander the great notwithstanding;-) and recent social-engineering to change that culture is doomed:-(

    i'm not opposed 2 women & gays in the military, but putting 18 y.o.s together in close quarters will result in pregnancies - duh! not 2 conducive to the mission...is it any wonder the superstition against women on ships arose? (xref: garcia's cover of 'handsome cabin boy';-)

  95. Without sex for 30 months? ANSWER = SLASHDOTTERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Question:

    "30 months??? Who the heck can function properly without sex for 30 months?" - by BottleCup (691335) on Saturday October 22, @04:25AM

    Answer:

    SLASHDOTTERS! (Especially the Pro-UNIX/Linux/BSD ones!)

    * :)

    (LOL!)

    But, "seriously folks" - I have a pal nicknamed "the Rat" (whom I gave that nickname 22 years ago no less), who, though he isn't the 'most educated guy' (but, is one of the best chess players I've ever met & I am a fairly avid player myself for decades now)?

    Made one HELL of a point, & that is this:

    MOST FIGHTS START OVER 2 THINGS - Money, or WOMEN!

    (Isn't it the truth?)

    APK

    P.S.=> To this very day, 20++ years later? I'm forced to agree, it's usually the case... the remaining %'s are simply testosterone & fighting for 'pecking rights' in the pack with guys battling, imo! apk

  96. No Kurds in Star Trek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Re:Where no man has gone before
    (Score:5, Funny)
    by aussie_a (778472) on Saturday October 22, @04:37AM (#13851314)

    Yes but Kird never did it with McCoy or Spock or Ensign Rand. That's the important part. NASA isn't banning interspecial sex, just sex among the crew (what NASA will do if it decides to send George Bus^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H a moneky
    (emphasis added)


    A cheap shot at George Bush is really funny from somebody who can't even spell "Kirk" correctly.

    And by the way, chimpanzees are apes, not monkeys. I would expect an intellectual such as yourself -- and all the Slashdroids who modded you "+5 Funny" -- to know the difference.
  97. Heinlein by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew
    > functioning'.

    I see someone at NASA has read 'Stranger in a Strange Land'.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:Heinlein by a24061 · · Score: 1
      > > Sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew
      > > functioning'.

      > I see someone at NASA has read 'Stranger in a Strange Land'.

      Or just listened to Blue Öyster Cult's "Monsters".

  98. Robotic missions by ewg · · Score: 1

    Serious comment: this is one more reason to focus on cheaper, safer, robotic missions.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  99. That's gay! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > On a mission to Mars, for example, which would
    > take up to 30 months, sexual conflict or infidelity
    > could lead to a 'breakdown in crew functioning'.

    Solution? All-gay missions.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  100. Speak for yourself... by RoverDaddy · · Score: 1
    Lessee. All my crewmates are male, we can only shower twice a month, 5 o'clock shadow has reached epic proportions, our breath reeks of unpalatable space food. Yep, likelihood of any sex: less than zero (I'll space myself first).

    I imagine NASA would solve this one by incorporating a little 'private time' in the daily schedule for each crew member and their own personal video collection. The only thing that worries me is the additional 'raw material' that might be diverted from the waste recycling system.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
    1. Re:Speak for yourself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So space travel's gonna be like prison? There's sex there too, you know. God, is there sex.

    2. Re:Speak for yourself... by uncqual · · Score: 1
      The 'raw material' problem seems like a serious concern. Remember that (at least for the earlier missions) NASA developed toothpaste that was swallowed after brushing to avoid uncaptured gobs of saliva-toothpaste glop floating around the craft.

      Hmm... I think a device would be needed here -- I really wouldn't be looking forward to being on board for 30 months without a good plan for raw material capture and containment (visions of unidentified flying globs floating around - ugh...).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    3. Re:Speak for yourself... by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Funny

      >I think a device would be needed here [for] raw material capture and containment

      What, no kleenex on board?

      Yeah, I can picture it now. NASA spends millions studying the problem and comes up with a 'device' to ensure the containment of seminal emissions and develops the thing at a cost of millions more.

      The russians just jack off into kleenex like everyone else.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  101. "Take me 'round the world one more time." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh oh. I don't think Mr. Bond will be doing any more world-saving when things are going that way.

    NASA is playing it right in to the hands of criminal super-genious overlords everywhere, which, I, for one, would like to welcome.

  102. solution by labyrinth · · Score: 5, Funny
    I think NASA should adopt the Dr.Strangelove solution.

    General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

    Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature. Ambassador de Sadesky: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.

    1. Re:solution by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Probably most people that have seen (or claim to have paid attention to) the movie remember the other, more dramatic scenes.

  103. What is going on inside ISS? by homerito · · Score: 1

    All this makes me wonder how much wanking is going on inside ISS...

  104. Bromine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They used to give soldier bromine in their tea in WWI. It was meant to help them stay focused on the job in hand (no pun intended!). Not that I can imagine getting too distracted stuck in a cold muddy trench with the other side throwing shells at me. Whatever side you were on.

  105. Desperate Astronaut Housewives 9023156 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would be a great source of funding for NASA. Just make manned space missions into reality shows "Lust in Space", complete with big breasted, scantily clad astronauts and square jawed, poorly shaven, hunky men astronauts, a zero G hot tub and spa, and one or two astronaut characters you're never too sure about who could be sabeuteurs. But you'll notice that since NASA's doing more serious, scientific stuff like building ant colonies in space and making better packing foam, they'll nix that idea just like the space tourism idea. Maybe if they're lucky, they'll merge with the US Post Office.

  106. Someone at NASAread "Stranger In a Strange Land"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, now we'll never have our legally three-parented, psychologically martian, trillionaire supergenius overlord.

  107. Someone get parent a promotion by mbius · · Score: 1

    I thought a previous +5 Insightful comment was merely funny. This one is fracking brilliant.

    --
    you can have my violent video games when you pry them from my cold, dead hands.
    Prime UID Club
  108. That does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no more "manned" missions. Just robotic spacecraft. We cannot affort screwups in space, the
    tax dollars are getting spread too thin as it is what with Iraq, Katrina, etc.
    Building robotic spacecraft provides tech jobs on Earth, and the people can do what they want at home off the job.

  109. Space Sex by eggmit · · Score: 1
  110. James Bond is officially grounded by jacklebot · · Score: 1

    Well, this pretty much grounds James Bond, eh? I mean how can he NOT have sex? Though, nasa should talk to him about the physics of doing the nasty in zero-g. I'm sure he could write a book about it!:-P

  111. Oh...... by mblase · · Score: 1

    If they really expect people to go 30 months without sex then they should provide medication that will reduce their sex drive.

    I first read that as "modification", not "medication". I was wondering how you'd get a bunch of astronauts to agree to a Mars mission if they knew they were going to be made eunuchs first....

  112. Data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, look at Tasha and Data.

    Data was just a big computerized dildo to her.

    I just wanted to see an episode where Data got to meet Seven, (after he received his emotion chip) and upon seeing her for the first time his very first words to her (in a Groucho Marx impression) would be "I'm fully functional and programmed in multiple techniques" (nudge nudge wink wink).
    His brief encounter with the Borg Queen in "First Contact" and the same quote was just plain gross.

  113. Please please please cancel NASA's budget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's it, I'm seriously done with them! Prudes in space!!!!

    Put them in the airlock and press the evac button.

    No sex leads to war... I mean what else is there to do if
    you can't make love :(

  114. Dominus vobiscum by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    Hey, we've already done a large-scale social experiment where we recruited healthy young men, gave them a job, and told them to go a lifetime without sex when other people around them were having it, and it turned out OK, didn't it?

    Oh, wait...

  115. Masturbation by barkholt · · Score: 1

    Just force everyone to masturbate twice a day - that will help control everybodys sexdrive. Is that not the way every lonely guy keeps insanity at bay?

    --
    - barkholt
  116. Well it MIGHT be good by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

    If two of the astronauts were having an affair and the child that resulted from the pregnancy was abandoned on the Martian landscape, and the advanced beings that lived their raised him as their own and he came back and revolutionzed the way that we think....

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    1. Re:Well it MIGHT be good by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1
      "Khaaaaannnn!!!"
  117. Grok it? - Stranger in a Strange Land by darkera · · Score: 0

    Conflict on a mission to Mars couldn't be all that bad. Hell, we could get out of it weird ass psychic powers and a messiah whom we can stone to death underneath a freeway. But when you can think people out of existence and your whole religion is based on sex... I'm just saying worse things could happen.

  118. Absolutely Brilliant! by MooseByte · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Sex and romantic entanglements among astronauts could derail missions to Mars and should therefore be studied by NASA, warns a top-level panel of US researchers."

    So in reality we've got a top-level panel of US researches who are tantalizingly close to achieving the ultimate Holy Grail - pursuing workplace sex, romantic entanglements and porn in the name of "research".

    Godspeed lads, godspeed.

    1. Re:Absolutely Brilliant! by Wytil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since anti fertility shots aren't a problem, 2 problems remain: 1) How many tons of saltpetre will be needed to reduce the libidos on board. 2) Is NASA planning on leaving a trail of feminine sanitary products orbitally headed for Mars? Of course limit the expidition to astronaults over 65 who can handle/solve all of those problems.

    2. Re:Absolutely Brilliant! by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      How many tons of saltpetre will be needed to reduce the libidos on board.

      Just give them whatever the crew on Star Trek: The Next Generation ate. Those guys acted like castrated gay monks.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  119. RTFA - NASA has nothing to do with this by slightlyspacey · · Score: 1

    It would perhaps help if slashdot submitters actually read the articles that they refer to first :). This was a report from the National Academy of Sciences recommending that NASA look at this. NASA has not made a decision nor officially looked at this. From the article:

    "NASA plans to return astronauts to the Moon by 2018 and later on to Mars. But a round-trip mission to the Red Planet would probably last at least 30 months and carry six to eight people. That would be a hotbed for intense crew relationships, says a report by the ***US National Academy of Sciences (NAS)***.

    "With the prospect of a very long-term mission, it's hard to ignore the question of sexuality," says Lawrence Palinkas, a medical anthropologist at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, an author of the report. It reviewed NASA's plans for research to keep astronauts safe and healthy in space - ****but the plans make no mention**** of sexual issues in spaceflight."

  120. I'd be surprised by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1
    I'd be surprised if they didn't end up resorting to any kind of sex they could get after 30 months.

    ...and it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

  121. Kids in space! by flandery · · Score: 1

    A 30 month trip? Just think of 9 months into mission time. I'm surprised nobody thought of the end result.. KIDS IN SPAAAACE! Heck, if they manage to time this one right we can have a bona fide Martian alien when they come back home.

  122. Space sex trouble by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Not to mention these issues, just imagine the fun they and the rest of the crew will have when they need to catch globs of bodily fluids flying around the craft.

    Ewww!

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  123. no ban on space sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article doesn't say a thing about nasa putting a stop to anything. they are doing studies.

  124. Props to Zonk by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 1

    ...for the perfect "department" lead in with "from the heinlein-rolling-in-his-grave dept."

  125. Space masturbation... by CptPicard · · Score: 1

    ... should help alleviate boredom during long space voyages, they say.

    I must admit I don't quite like imagining the situation of (male) astronauts entertaining themselves in a confined space in a zero-gravity environment. Can you imagine how sticky all the panels and controls of their spacecraft would get over time?

    Then again, if they are geeks who just got out of their parents' basement, they are of course used to their keyboards being in a similar condition...

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    1. Re:Space masturbation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can quit being a retard and jizz into a towel like everyone else.

  126. Re:Simple solution (viagra?) by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    By giving them man what? Viagra on daily base?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  127. Not really an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you seen the women NASA hires? I mean, seriously. I don't think 30 years without sex would make them desirable.

  128. The solution Bittorrent + porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They dont need to have sex with each other! What about some masturbation with daily fresh downloaded porn off the NASA servers?

  129. Send Swedes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least Swedish babes...long legs, no hangups, intelligent, independent & photogenic.
    I volunteer to supervise.

    Someone has to do it.

  130. Spoiler Warning Please. by darkonc · · Score: 1

    Please remember that there are some people who haven't seen Serenity, and may still be planning to (Yeah, it does happen). Spoiler warnings (in the subject line) are standard to allow people to avoid plot suspense spoilage.

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  131. You're right!! But this should work... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
    Just don't tell the astronauts about (nor provide acess to) condoms. In fact, just teach them about the beauty of abstinence before they leave. They won't even think about sex then! It's simple really.

    Damn... I forgot. That doesn't work.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  132. Space sex by earthstar · · Score: 1
    Any idea anyone,how sex would look like @ ZERO gravity?

    Jus wondering if its gonna seem any different from the ones we see here!!!

  133. So, hire a fix. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Hire a clean, attractive lady to join the crew to fulfill their desires when the situation presents itself.

    It's simple, really.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  134. Re:Fine, let's give it all to the Russians, then.. by Hosiah · · Score: 1
    You be fair; I'm not very good at it! (:

    It's just that: every concern for sexual politics you can name happens to ordinary people right here on the ground all the time. People screw, unscrew, regroup, remove, and repent. See, you could send swinging couples up, so everybody can be comfortable with everybody else. Or make all the crew-members gay as some have suggested (though I don't know why; gays can break up and cheat and fight with the best of 'em). Or bring on people who don't have a high sex drive (even the most promiscuous of us can go 30 months without sex...such as after being widowed or divorced).

    See, I've been places and seen things, and was for a while a frequenter of...if I described it, people would say "swinger's clubs", and that's not it at all, but we'll call them "swinger's clubs". You *learn* things about people, there. You learn to *relax* about sex! It happens. It happens to some people more than others, of course, and it happens in forms that attract and repell different kinds of people, given. You discover that you can be part of the orgy, or a spectator, and after a few turns at both, it doesn't make as much of a difference. Believe it or not, a group of people in a space capsule for 30 months are pretty much going to do what comes naturally, and you'd just better be ready to deal with it. Fix them, pack condoms, whatever it takes. It's also not the Soap Opera that people are trying to make it out to be: couples with rotten relationships stay together for years for the sake of the kids; I'm sure a couple can stick it out for the sake if the human race's most advanced scientific mission, which they would have been training for all their lives.

    But all of the above could get me damn near burned at the stake for heresay in this society. Nope, monotheist, patriarchal cultures have a *H_U_G_E* problem with sex, said problem being their sole unique characteristic, and thus believe that everybody else does, too. Well, censoring my TV, books, internet, video games, children's education, etc is bad enough. But the advancement of the whole human race is waiting on us to get our asses off the fence and EVOLVE already, and we're gonna blow it because we can't make up our minds what to do with our genitalia for 3 years? Time to head back to the cave and let the monkeys have a go: we're not fit to be the most advanced species.

  135. Re:I wouldn't say everyone on the crew... by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Haven't these people seen Star Trek? Kirk did it with every green woman in space, and that crew turned out fine...

    Every time Kirk bags a space chic, god kills a red shirt.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  136. Something tells me that... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...a Japanese robot entraprenurer will announce a "solution" in about 6 months from now. Mark my words.

  137. Quantum entanglements are still allowed? by dnorman · · Score: 1

    Sure, a quantum entanglement may not be as much fun as a romantic entanglement, but just how far does the NASA crackdown on entanglements reach?

    --


    It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  138. No nookie in space...That's my story and... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    I'm stickin' to it.

    The L5 Song
    Home, home on Lagrange
    Where the space debris always collects,
    We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams:
    Solar power and zero-gee sex.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  139. Hey, you're sex-deprived! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, you need to get laid! It'll help relieve your stress and frustrations, and is far more enjoyable than posting flames on Slashdot!

  140. The Feminists would go nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we sent a 3-person male crew to Mars, with the design being that there would be no sex (and these men were straight) and thus less problems, the feminists would ignore any scientific findings of higher-success probabilities due to an idea that whenever women are not exacty 50% of something. They would argue that it must be because "men" are keeping them down.

  141. Never thought of it this way but... by GeekyGal · · Score: 0

    I guess Space Sex gives a whole new meaning to the Mile High Club. Suppose they'll have to rename it too! Miles High Club maybe?

  142. Further Testing Is Necessary by SenFo · · Score: 1

    Send me up with all these women all you guys speak of and I'll personally let the world know how my mission goes.

  143. A 17th Century Model is Needed by tjstork · · Score: 1

    For long space voyages, a lesson from the past is in order to preserve crew discipline. Consider how the British did it, when ships were at sea for months at a time, there was no radio or niceties that we live with.

    a) The Captain rules the ship with an iron fist and has a compliment of marines to back him up.

    b) The crew is fairly well paid, is issued a bit of a booze ration, but does exactly what the Captain says or they are whipped or thrown out the airlock.

    This model did take over the world, you know.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:A 17th Century Model is Needed by a24061 · · Score: 1

      As Churchill probably didn't really say, "The only traditions of the Royal Navy are rum, sodomy and the lash."

  144. castration Re:Simple solution by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    Just snip/cut/remove all relevant hidden contraband hormone generators. Eunuchs works better in space anyways. ;)

    Or even better, do it like Spock's brain, and only have robotic bodies when you need to EVA/explore the ground.

    Either that or send a couple guys, a lot of women, and use King Solomon social rules up there.

    1. Re:castration Re:Simple solution by jridley · · Score: 1

      I suggest you listen to the This American Life episode entitled "testosterone".

      One of the true stories in it is of a person who had a disorder that made his body stop producing testosterone. It turns out that without testosterone people (both men and women) lose pretty much all desire to do anything at all or even think. This guy was just as happy to lay in bed all day as to go to work, he had no desires, he had no reaction to anything; he could walk down the street, and his brain would just identify things without reacting; "brick in wall" - "dog shit on ground" - "dead baby in street" - no reaction to anything.

      It was a fascinating set of stories.

  145. Technical term by Alomex · · Score: 1

    sexual conflict or infidelity could lead to a 'breakdown in crew functioning'.

    This is scientifically known as the "ABBA effect".

  146. Americans and Sex by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Why, oh why, do American authorities have this obsession with regulating sex? US authorities are in some ways very similar to medieval Europe and modern day Islamic states. Stupid idiots...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  147. Easy answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy answer to space sex potential "conflict".

    Just make sure the all crew members are POLYAMOROUS .

    End of "problem".

    It's worked for me for 35 years now.

  148. Sex in space to bring further evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will not evolve further as a human race until we conquer the next frontier of "sex in space". Once we acheive sex in space we will progress into next phase of evolution. It is most important to acheive sex in space. If not NASA will bring us sex in space then some other company, acency, or organization need to get funding to accomplish sex in space. I volunteer to be one who will be launched for sex in space.

  149. Easy solution by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    They should make the ship out of the same materials that The Champagne Room is made out of. Cause there's no sex going on in there.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  150. Other Concerns with Space Sex by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

    First off, where does the ejaculate go? I mean, if M+M's drift everywhere......

    not to mention how a few short+curlies end up in random places. I can't imagine floating with my tube of soup and finding one of THOSE drifting by.

    And to consider the laws of motion....if you're not into bondage, you're going to have a hell of a time managing the deed. You're probably as likely to crumple on her pelvis as get anywhere with every 3rd thrust or so.

    Nah, I think I'll pass on the Love Capsule.

  151. An obvious alternative... by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    ... though apparently not so obvious to NASA, is to send people who are mature adults and don't have hang ups that make them confuse relationship with ownership.

    Of course then the majority of the US population which does have that hang up will try to claim that NASA is "condoning" "immoral" behavior and the mass media would reap a billion dollar windfall winding up the sheeple by feeding their frenzy.

    So many problems would be alleviated if people would just elevate "mind your own fucking business" to the level of a moral imperative like beneficence and nonmalfeasance.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  152. What's the Navy been doing? by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    This issue has obviously been dealt with in practice by the Navy. With all of the other far more obvious problem, why is this even an issue?

    1. Re:What's the Navy been doing? by Przepla · · Score: 1
      This issue has obviously been dealt with in practice by the Navy.
      By rum, sodomy and the lash.
      --
      When in doubt, go to the library. - Ron Weasley in Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets
  153. Lol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that would be cool. Sex with biofeedback.

  154. uh, masterbation would be very bad by r00t · · Score: 1

    There isn't any gravity. I sure wouldn't want to bump into a sticky floating droplet, would you? Worse yet, people need to breathe. Careful!

  155. why only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you should be maximizing what you've got while your stuck up there for so long...

  156. Just a thought by Jambon · · Score: 1
    Who the heck can function properly without sex for 30 months?

    Monks, nuns, and slashdotters. Then again, you could always sidestep the whole sex thing and hibernate the crew for the majority of the trip. I would just be extra careful as to what kind of computer system was in charge of that...

    Anyway, let's say people were to have sex in space, and, for the sake of argument, were to conceive (and there not be an abortion). Does anyone know what the effects zero gravity would have on gestation? Would the child even be able to return to and environment with gravity in it?

  157. Re:Fine, let's give it all to the Russians, then.. by CthulhuDreamer · · Score: 1

    "Hopefully they'd be smart enough to get permenantly sterilized before trying something like that..."

    And miss out on all those superpowered children? Just think of the possibilities combinations for conceiving new overlords: radiation belts, solar flares, ion storms...

  158. Politics on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Everyone should know that Bush supporters are either pick-up driving ultra-manly posturing rednecks, subservient Xanax-popping wives with low self-esteem or geeks/McJesus-freaks in high school or college who've never dealt with the real world and think they know something all them faggots and city-slickers don't. Which one of these three is most likely to be on Slashdot?

    Don't bash Bush on Slashdot, fools... his Christ'n warriors'll nuke yer faggoty asses like they done to that Saa-damn and Osama bin-- oh, wait, I guess they forgot about him..

    1. Re:Politics on slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      supporting bush and being fed up with people always talking about him in completely offtopic ways are two very different things you crazy bastard

  159. It worked in the old days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bring back the Castrati.

  160. Don't Forget... by penguin_strut · · Score: 1
    You're forgetting that "our brave astronauts" are God-fearing, Freedom-spreading, flag-waving, hotdog-eating Nascar-watching honest-to-God American Christian space-missionaries...or so the story goes, depending on which administration's sending them up. Hence, if we don't put a chaplain onboard to marry them, they couldn't possibly be so vile as to have unwed sexual relations...right?

    Oh, and who's worried about the logistics of sex in space? I'm more worried about the logistics of the cleanup. 30 months without sex is nothing compared to 30 months with "used" bedsheets...

  161. Viagra anyone? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

    Sorta brings a whole new meaning to "Houston, we have a problem!" :)

  162. Who needs sex when you have zero gravity? by phossie · · Score: 1


    Anybody - and I mean anybody - with an imagination.

    --

    [|]
  163. 30 months? What if someone gets pregnant? by Mahkno · · Score: 1

    30 months? What if someone gets pregnant?

    Talk about a complication.... can hear the right to lifers complaining already.

  164. Bad move. by MaXiMiUS · · Score: 0

    2/5 astronauts will quit their jobs the moment they're informed of this. I swear.

    --
    It's never just a game when you're winning. - George Carlin
  165. XXX-prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Add this to the list of reasons why private spaceflight must succeed. I want to be in the 2,000 mile high club, dammit!

  166. Stranger in a Strange Land by Guy_Kalunette · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how Robert A. Heinlein's Stranger in a Strange Land starts. With the crew of a mars mission killing each other over this ?

  167. Heterosexual Married Couples Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . easy answer.

  168. What about the children. by Stopher2475 · · Score: 0

    Let's not forgot if a chick got knocked up on the way to mars they would run out of air, food and H20. Plus imagine having to be in a small tin can with your woman for the few years it would take to get there. I'd have to jump out the airlock.

  169. There goes my PHD in Space conception by axonis · · Score: 1

    There goes my PHD in Space conception, I was really looking forward to researching repeatedly "docking proceedures" in Zero G with opposite sex participants

    --
    bæ8Ã0sÃOE?5r©oÂÃ?âz:ÃÃAÃ?ÃOEÂ6fXÃ?]Â
  170. As someone who has not yet seen the movie ... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    As someone who has not yet seen the movie, I just want to say thanks a lot, asshole.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  171. This is the best argument for privatization by smartalix · · Score: 1

    Ever!

    In fact, private spacecraft will probably have suites designed for nothing but zero-gee sex (ZGS).

    C'mon, ZGS has to be better than regular sex if only because your arm won't fall asleep with her head on it anymore.

    --
    Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  172. What I love about Slashdot by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    This is what I love about Slashdot. You can always find a language geek when you need one.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  173. Pierre Boulle already thought of this by znmeb · · Score: 1

    Actually, Pierre Boulle already thought of this. Read his short story, "Love and Gravity".

    --
    -- M. Edward (Ed) Borasky http://linuxcapacityplanning.com
  174. Re:Somewhat Surprised, Heinlein pointed this out.. by ValentineMSmith · · Score: 1

    Well, I was referring to my nickname more than anything else.

    --
    Karma: Chameleon - mostly influenced by bad '80s New Wave music
  175. Terrorist activities? by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Living in parents basement: Check
    Anti-social behaviour: Check
    Radical beliefs: Check
    Terrorist activities: Check


    Hey! I may be a terrorist, but I am a white-hat terrorist! I only blow buildings up to publicize flaws in anti-bomb security. If I didn't perform this valuable public service, some unscrupulous black-hat terrorist might have blown it up. And black-hat terrorists are all unethical capitalist bastards. That must not come about!

    ::KA-BOOM::

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.