Slashdot Mirror


No Porn for You, iPod

TheBrutalTruth writes "Wired has an article explaining why pornographers are staying away from the Video IPod. From the article: 'When it comes to the iPod, Fayling said there are few rewards and many risks. Fayling emphasized the pitfalls of combining a device designed for younger audiences with content they are prohibited from viewing. "There's already a public perception that we (in the industry) are preying on youth," he said. "Without safeguards you open yourself up to more scrutiny from government and parents' groups.'"

247 comments

  1. damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    teh one handed holding of an ipod woudl be pretty cool.... did I say that out loud?

    1. Re:Damn by xiando · · Score: 1

      I was about to, then I did whois and found someone took the name back in 1998.. I will of course follow your idea as soon as you come up with another great name that's not already taken.

    2. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be "Wank Differently" god-damn it.

  2. No, they are not staying away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Staying away from the iPod? You got to be kidding me!
    http://povpod.com/

    1. Re:No, they are not staying away! by rdwald · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Staying away from the iPod? You got to be kidding me!
      http://povpod.com/

      I know this is Slashdot, but if you bothered to RTFA, you'd see that povPod.com is specifically mentioned in the article as providing porn for the iPod. Sheesh.
    2. Re:No, they are not staying away! by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

      povPod?

      What, I can now render my Pov-Ray scenes on the go?

      Nice way to use those CPU cycles when you get sick of listening to music, I guess...

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:No, they are not staying away! by Deviate_X · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Call me cynical but this just looks like a cheap method of advertising for the two porn websites.

      Slashdot should not have linked to the Wired article and and Wired should not have linked to porn sites, however i suspect they are being paid to do so.

    4. Re:No, they are not staying away! by xiando · · Score: 2, Funny

      The adult anY Of Us industry does not pAy foR that kind of slEazy adveRtIsements in-line in content. NothinG indicaTes that this is very common. There are also nobody In the inDustry who posts on Slashdot just to promote theIr websites. This post is meant to be informative anD NOT just something I wrote to make you click my link and then onto the porn sites listed theer. Such claims are just Bogous, wIerD arE Not that corrUpt, nothinG indicates tHey got money.

    5. Re:No, they are not staying away! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone explain why this is teh funnay.

  3. But they're a perfect match! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Operates with one hand!
    Sponges right off!

    The iPod that is.

    1. Re:But they're a perfect match! by Stoned4Life · · Score: 1

      Heh, pov (point of view) pod.com gives you that, point of view.

      --
      Stoned4Life
      gen = new Random
    2. Re:But they're a perfect match! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sponges right off"? I'd hate to be the Mac Genius stuck with inspecting your iPod when the click wheel gets gummed up... and I'm pretty sure any such damage would fall under the "user abuse" category of your AppleCare agreement!

    3. Re:But they're a perfect match! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already converted my dvd porn does that mean i have to get it off?

  4. Fair enough by matr0x_x · · Score: 0, Troll

    As much as I hate to see the potential content of the video iPod decreased - I really think that most people believe not allowing porn on the video iPods is a good thing!

    --
    LINUX ONLINE POKER: Linux Poker
  5. let me be the first by cicatrix1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    to say... "yeah right".

    --

    I know more than you drink.
    1. Re:let me be the first by tpgp · · Score: 4, Funny

      to say... "yeah right".

      Ipod porn actually prceeds the video ipod!

      Here's some ipod porn

      (NSFW - If your Boss has a fetish for watching consumer electronics getting busy!)

      On a serious note - why would anyone with an iPod want porn on it? Just looking at the sleek, curvy lines of an iPod Nano seems to give most Nano owners an erection as it is....

      --
      My pics.
    2. Re:let me be the first by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just looking at the sleek, curvy lines of an iPod Nano seems to give most Nano owners an erection as it is....

      Hell, if the Nano had an option to vibrate it would be many a girl's best friend.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:let me be the first by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Honestly, if people want iPod porn, use a video converter! Its pretty easy in Windows, probably easier on the Mac, and Linux guys I'm sure will claim their video converters are easiest of all. iPod plays H.264 and MPEG4, which is a lot more common.

    4. Re:let me be the first by robertjw · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that the iPod shouldn't have porn because it IS porn. That being the case I don't think anyone under 18 should be allowed to own an iPod.

    5. Re:let me be the first by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


      I found some better ipod porn here.

    6. Re:let me be the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      [...] seems to give most Nano owners an erection as it is....

      I'm told it's quite small...

  6. Black sheep by Crouty · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Bad publicity has never stopped the black sheep of the industry. If any small company sees profit there, it will pornify any device.

    I Couldn't care less.

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
    1. Re:Black sheep by jrockway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      if I were a porn producer, I would just distribute my movies as H.264-encoded mov files and let the user do what he wants with it. H.264 plays under every OS now and it downloads cleanly to the iPod, so this sounds like a good solution. They're not specifically targeting the iPod (not that I see a problem here), but they're not standing in the way of people who want pr0n on their iPod. Plus it works under linux, which is more than you can say for the low-quality wmv and rm that seems to be the "industry standard" now.

      I, for some reason, don't see much interest in having porn on your iPod, though. I show my iPod to people all the time, and I wouldn't want them uncovering my pr0n stash! (Plus, when do you need porn and don't have a real computer or magazine around?)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:Black sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Plus, when do you need porn and don't have a real computer or magazine around?
      For the answer to that, look no further than your sig.
    3. Re:Black sheep by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The internal chip is supposed to be able to decode H.264 at VGA resolution, but Apple only claims it is able to play 480x480 videos, though scaled down, of course. But at least the software to recode video for the iPod's native resolution is readily available.

    4. Re:Black sheep by jamiethehutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus it works under linux, which is more than you can say for the low-quality wmv and rm that seems to be the "industry standard" now.

      Mplayer will play any format you throw at it (like mkv and other weird stuff as well as wmv and rm), the only thing I have problems with is Quicktime subtitles.

      Try it!

    5. Re:Black sheep by ronanbear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I were a porn producer I'd add a soundtrack to a few explicit sex scenes and start selling them as adult music videos.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    6. Re:Black sheep by prockcore · · Score: 1

      H.264 plays under every OS now and it downloads cleanly to the iPod, so this sounds like a good solution.

      Except that H.264 requires a pretty beefy CPU. My 600mhz ibook can't play the 320x240 stuff on iTMS. It just shows the first frame and plays the audio.. while taking up 100% cpu. No problems playing divx and mpegs at full frame rate.

    7. Re:Black sheep by lloydtesterman · · Score: 1

      yes, but will it run on a toaster? Toasterporn, it's not just for breakfast anymore! w00t!

    8. Re:Black sheep by ceeam · · Score: 1

      What? When coding Lisp _without_ "real computer around"? :)

    9. Re:Black sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something tells me that the joke in that sig went right over your head.

    10. Re:Black sheep by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Trust me, I've used mplayer for years. I know what it can do. The problem is that it uses binary win32 codecs to decode things like WMV3 and some Quicktime. Not only is this completely illegal (not that I care), it also dosen't work on x86-64, ppc, sparc, arm, etc. It's convenient for x86 uses, but not so convenient for everyone else. Rather than encourage people to support proprietary, DRM-encrusted formats by allowing them to "play" them under Linux, we should instead tell content producers that we want standards-compliant video. That way, EVERYONE can play them -- not just people that happening to be running Windows on x86.

      --
      My other car is first.
    11. Re:Black sheep by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Heck the new HD trailers on Apple's site are in H.264. My Athlon XP2100+ was jumpy playing the lowest res (480p) and flat out couldn't play anything higher. I finally figured it was time to upgrade since I'd hit something that my system couldn't do; upgraded to a Sempron 3400+ and I STILL can't play the highest res files (1080p), though I can now play 720p and 480p without issue.

      I must admit though, that the high defination H.264 video is the best looking digital video file format I've seen.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re:Black sheep by julesh · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it uses binary win32 codecs to decode things like WMV3 and some Quicktime. Not only is this completely illegal (not that I care)

      Why is this illegal? I own a copy of Windows that came with my PC. Quicktime is available for free download. I therefore have the right to use these products in any reasonable way I want to.

      it also dosen't work on x86-64, ppc, sparc, arm, etc.

      I understood that you could run the x86 parts of the process in a virtual Linux PC using QEMU, although I don't know what performance you'd get. As long as you had a reasonably modern machine, I'd have thought it would be reasonable, though.

    13. Re:Black sheep by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Plus, when do you need porn and don't have a real computer or magazine around?

      On the bus! On the train! on airplanes! Sometimes you just can't wait y'know?

  7. The porn industry preys on the young?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would young people ever want to view porn?! They're young enough to actually get laid. Why fantasize about what you can actually do?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by jettoki · · Score: 1

      It's called downtime, my friend. "Idle hands..."

    2. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by TheSloth2001ca · · Score: 3, Funny

      the problem is that some young people visit /. Therefore reducing their chance to get laid to almost nill

      --
      Just another crappy blog
    3. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      well, there's young good-looking people and then there's young /. readers.

    4. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by Dr.Sweety · · Score: 1
      Why would young people ever want to view porn?! They're young enough to actually get laid. Why fantasize about what you can actually do?!
      Note: This of course doesn't apply to young /. readers.
    5. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by nutshell42 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    6. Re:The porn industry preys on the young?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why would young people ever want to view porn?! They're young enough to actually get laid. Why fantasize about what you can actually do?!

      Because they're fat ugly geeks living in their parents' basement?

  8. Think about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What sort of iPod accessories would porn on the iPod spawn?

    1. Re:Think about this... by shrewd · · Score: 1

      i believe this http://www.vgcats.com/comics/images/050919.gif will show you the answer (replace revolution with ipod)

    2. Re:Think about this... by ElVaquero · · Score: 1

      Window wiper

    3. Re:Think about this... by bri999 · · Score: 1
  9. ftom the article... by F�an�ro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In February, a man was arrested in Schenectady, New York, for viewing an adult movie in his vehicle. Also this year, Tennessee outlawed the display of obscene movies from a car. The City Council in Flint, Michigan, passed a measure imposing a $500 fine upon drivers who play pornographic movies in their cars.

    WTF? there is a rule specifically against watching PORN in a CAR?
    Is this a rampant problem? Why would anyone need a rule against that?

    (I presume this is not about watching movies while driving)

    1. Re:ftom the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was driving home the other night, and a mini-van in front of me had porn playing on the tv in the back seat. You have no idea how hard it is to smoke a cigarette, talk on a cell phone, and watch a porn on the tiny mini-van tv in front of you while driving.

    2. Re:ftom the article... by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you get fined for having sex in the back of your car...

    3. Re:ftom the article... by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      In most areas of the United States you can be arrested and charged with a sex crime which means you have to register as a 'sex offender'.

      Just because it is the law doesn't mean it has to make sense.

    4. Re:ftom the article... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, it is only illegal if it can be seen from outside the vehicle. Which this essentially means is it's ok, as long as you don't get caught!

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    5. Re:ftom the article... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
      "You have no idea how hard it is to smoke a cigarette, talk on a cell phone, and watch a porn on the tiny mini-van tv in front of you while driving."

      I guess we should just be grateful that both of your hands were already occupied....

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    6. Re:ftom the article... by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Where do you draw the line? What if someone's just watching a really steamy rated R movie?

      I've noticed that if you have polarized sunglasses on and tilt at a certain angle the image on an LCD screen disappears, so maybe the vehicle windows could just be polarized in a certain way to hide the image..

    7. Re:ftom the article... by moeffju · · Score: 1

      May have used hands-free. ...

      For the phone.

      --
      follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/moeffju
    8. Re:ftom the article... by detlev409 · · Score: 1

      The is on the books because it is essentially displaying porn in public. Passing motorists of all ages will see the porn, whether they desire to or not, and they have no ability to turn off the offending video. I didn't think it was that big a deal myself, but I've heard stories to the contrary.

      Anyway, that's the idea. Whether you agree with it or not is up to you.

      --
      Howdy.
    9. Re:ftom the article... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      May have used hands-free. ...

      For the phone.


      Thanks for the clarification. Here I was thinking he'd cover himself in dried tobacco leaves and set himself on fire.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    10. Re:ftom the article... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      I think some states' window tinting laws also make polarized auto glass illegal. A search comes up with Pensylvania and Rhode Island requiring 70% of light to pass through. Polarized windows let through only 50%. But I don't know if those state's laws include exceptions for polarized glass.

      How such laws preventing your privacy in your car affect the admissability of evidence discovered in plain sight in a closed-window car (such as porn playing on an in-car DVD player's screen) I don't know. IANAL.

      But it might make for an funny case for Harvey Birdman Attorney at Law if Wonder Woman gets arrested for playing Wonder Twin Porn in her invisible jet's DVD player while flying next to a Dr. Quest's private jet where Jonny and Hadji could see it.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:ftom the article... by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      Displaying of porn in public is against the law, i'm ok with trhat. But why make an extra rule about cars? if the car is in public, the law should apply, and if it isn't who cares?

      And I'd really like to know who watches pornos in cars. I mean, how many cars are there with a television set anyway?

    12. Re:ftom the article... by detlev409 · · Score: 1

      Apparently there was some question as to whether or not the interior of the car represented a protected space, like one's home. The law was to clarify that it was indeed not a protected space.

      Not cars, but think about all the SUVs, mini-vans and trucks that come with built-in DVD players these days. I see them all the time on the interstate these days.

      --
      Howdy.
    13. Re:ftom the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I was thinking he'd cover himself in dried tobacco leaves and set himself on fire.

      Sorry it took so long to reply, I was in the hospital because that's what I did. Now you tell me that there's hands-free for my phone...

  10. Wait a tick... by axonal · · Score: 5, Informative

    Isn't there porn for PSP? I would see the PSP targeting a younger audience more than the iPod would.

    1. Re:Wait a tick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's tons of porn for the PSP, but in Japan, and not here. Such a thing here would probably garner some pretty negative attention.

    2. Re:Wait a tick... by Muppski · · Score: 1

      Probly is.
      You just take a video clip , resize it with Virtualdub http://www.virtualdub.org/ (or convert).

      Bang , video clips on a PSP

    3. Re:Wait a tick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would see the PSP targeting a younger audience more than the iPod would.

      Yes, but in Korea PSPs are only for old people.

  11. OMG! by c0l0 · · Score: 1, Funny

    After all those years of canalizing internet geekdom and posting-efforts of nerds all around the world, don't you find it somewhat shocking that there's no "pr0n"-Section on /.?!

    --
    :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

    YTARY!
    1. Re:OMG! by queazocotal · · Score: 1
      Slutdot? Slitdot? Slagdot?

      The possibilities are endless.

    2. Re:OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:OMG! by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      *dives on SlutDot* Yay .. ill sell porn to geeks using open source and make money... to pay for MY porn!

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  12. from the male porn star's point of view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last week, povPod.com started offering several downloadable videos "shot from the male porn star's point of view."

    hah, now, THAT's a first person shooter.

    1. Re:from the male porn star's point of view... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      AC just won the thread. Go outside and play now.

    2. Re:from the male porn star's point of view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC needs food badly!

    3. Re:from the male porn star's point of view... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AC needs food badly!

      AC, I have OJ in the car.

  13. Note to self... by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Funny


    Create porn blocking flag for ipod and sell it. Make one hojillion dollars.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    1. Re:Note to self... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Or we could just tell the iPod pornographers to set the evil bit

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Note to self... by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

      If "porn" then no Beck download for you. Here's your $40000000

  14. How long before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like unlabelled tapes from thirft stores, people buying second-hand iPods with "home videos" the previous owners forgot to erase?

  15. Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Land of the unfree and the slaves...

  16. What will the others say.... by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 0

    Apple steps up to the anti porn plate. What will the rest say? Apple has all the money in the world. Those more desperate (Real, Media Player) will say yes. Once the YES vote earns the super dollars, Apple will either cave or give up huge potential income. Kudos to Apple for holding the line... for now but the pressure will become unbearable as society breaks down. Can't we all just have values?

    1. Re:What will the others say.... by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Uh, if you'd bother to have read the article, this isn't about apple not allowing porn, this is about porn makers treading cautiously, allowing some of the smaller players to test the market and business models before they jump in.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    2. Re:What will the others say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We all have values, just some of us don't like fairy tale worshippers to tell us what to do and how to live.

    3. Re:What will the others say.... by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      umm.. i think you misread. apple isn't stopping the porn industry, the porn industry is refraining (so far). there is no way apple can stop them if they wanted. if you support a video format, you have to play whatever is encoded in that format (wether it's an ipod, a tv, or a computer). it's like saying "apple won't allow lame songs to be played on the ipod, but creative and iriver will because they are desperate". i understand you want to clap for apple, but isn't really about them this time. besides, watching porn has nothing to do with "values".

      also, i'm sure apple might secretly encourage the porn industry to setup on the ipod. not that the ipod needs any help, but having the vote of the porn industry is a big boost. just look at vhs.

    4. Re:What will the others say.... by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1
      Can't we all just have values?

      Everyone has values, its just that sometimes they're not the same as yours.

      I bet even Richard Stallman has watched porn at one time or another.

    5. Re:What will the others say.... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      there is no way apple can stop them if they wanted.

      Apple could push an update for video iPods that restricts playback to Apple-signed content and locks out non-updated iPods from being used with iTMS. It would however also kill any video podcasts that aren't distributed through iTMS and any other personally converted video content not submitted to Apple for approval.

      Not that that would be smart (it would be a damn fool thing to do), only that it would be possible. I don't think Apple would.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  17. Privacy by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here's what I don't get: who would watch porn on an iPod? First, you need privacy for porn. A group can be interesting; but it's usually just awkward. Next, you need semi-hands free operation. I guess you could prop you iPod agianst something...

    I guess if you just have to jack off in the bathroom at work or you can't make it 4 stops on the subway, then go for it. But the other 99.98% of us will just delay our jacking till we get home.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    1. Re:Privacy by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Funny

      A group can be interesting

      Which would give a new meaning to the term "flash mob".

      --
      home
    2. Re:Privacy by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

      What about the other 90% of us blokes who HAVE NO NEED for porn or 'jacking'?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:Privacy by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I can't point out any real data, I'd be willing to bet that just about every mas has jacked off. Most probably do it at least once a week.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    4. Re:Privacy by MacGod · · Score: 1

      The people who would watch porn (with or without jacking off) are probably the same people who expose themselves in public. Some people are just overly-exhibitionist and depraved.

      In the case of iPod-porn, it might go even further. Imagine a "Jackass" show or people who just like to disturb others in general, watching porn in public. As it is, some people like to talk about sex or other socially taboo-ish topics very openly, for the express purpose of disturbing those around them. I wouldn't be surprised if public iPod porn was an extension of this.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    5. Re:Privacy by vidarh · · Score: 1
      You mean the other "0.9%", presumably...

      Seriously. If you're naive enough to thing it's 90% you seriously need to take a look at the sales numbers for the porn industry.

      This article is quite enlightening, and as a bonus it summarises some of the research debunking the myth that porn contributes to violence.

      You're the one that belongs to the freaky minority - deal with it.

    6. Re:Privacy by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      While I can't point out any real data, I'd be willing to bet that just about every mas has jacked off. Most probably do it at least once a week.

      You know, that's a sexist remark. Women masterbate too. And, of course, there is a distinct population that actually has managed to never conciously masterbate.

      But upon reaching a socially acceptable age to begin fornication, the practice dies off quickly. Most humans pair off with a sexual partner in a religious/legal relationship, allowing them easy access to sexual satisfaction that is all but univerally preferred to masterbation.

      Try the Kinsey study if you're really interested.

    7. Re:Privacy by Denyer · · Score: 1

      Possibly someone travelling for a few days away from home without a laptop. Having a portable device doesn't imply people will use it in publican iPod or laptop is a clear theft risk, anyway.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    8. Re:Privacy by Denyer · · Score: 1

      And would someone tell me why the hell Slashdot filters out character code 8212 (the m-dash)? Comment above should read "in public--an iPod or laptop is a clear theft risk, anyway."

      http://www.alistapart.com/stories/emen/

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
    9. Re:Privacy by Fafnir43 · · Score: 1

      This has got to be a troll, but I'll bite. The global porn industry is worth about 60 billion dollars. Assuming an average annual expenditure per pundit of fifty dollars (which seems high), that's a total of about 1.2 billion people paying for porn worldwide. Even ignoring the people who get their porn free (probably at least another billion), and the people without access to porn, that makes 20% of the global population who should, by your logic, be exposing themselves in public. Now, while I haven't checked the incidence of exhibitionist crimes in America, somehow I doubt they reflect your view of reality.

      --
      To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
    10. Re:Privacy by MacGod · · Score: 1

      Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. I was referring to the parent poster of my original post, who was saying there won't be a market for iPod porn because people won't want to watch in public. What I meant to imply was that the only people who WOULD wish to do so are the types who expose themselves in public. This is no doubt a very small minority, but they no doubt exist. Now, exposing yourself with an iPod in one hand and your schwonkenhopper in the other isn't really any worse than just exposing yourself, but nonetheless, I just meant that there would be a very miniscule percentage of people who would, in fact, be potentially interested in iPod porn while taking the subway to work. I wasn't trolling, just not as clear as I intended to be.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    11. Re:Privacy by Fafnir43 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - my bad. I thought you were referring to people who watched porn full stop - sorry! I totally agree.

      --
      To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
    12. Re:Privacy by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      why would you need to prop the ipod up? last time i checked, you could operate it one-handed. unless you use both hands to jerk or have only one hand, this is not a problem. if the latter is true, i apologize for being an insensative clod in advance.

    13. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is very interesting that you believe intercourse is universally preferred to masturbation. Don't get me wrong, it is a better quality experience (more bang for your buck - no pun intended), but there is a substantial investment in effort to get started and a much lower rate of return. When it comes down to it, sometimes (a lot of the time) I don't want to be bothered heating up the proverbial iron. Sometimes you just want to be by yourself and think about the things you want to think about and do whatever it is you please. I hate referencing studies that I can't actually point to and haven't actually read, but I have heard it said that the vast majority of men continue to masturbate well into their marriage. I find that to be extremely plausible. I don't know what the statistics are for women, but I wouldn't be surprised to find it somewhat less.

    14. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a woman(even if your not) who has no idea what her husband does when she isn't around. And I hardly mean that in some sort of mean-spirited way.

    15. Re:Privacy by SuperDuG · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure which is worse ... the fact you thought this all the way out ... or the fact that you thought it all the way out and were then noted as insightful ...

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    16. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can someone tell me why the frick I was too stupid to use the "Preview" feature?

      Preview - it's not just a good idea, it's the law

    17. Re:Privacy by Lucractius · · Score: 2, Funny

      three words about relationships providing easy access to sexual satisfaction

      "Not tonight honey"

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    18. Re:Privacy by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 2, Informative
      But upon reaching a socially acceptable age to begin fornication, the practice dies off quickly. Most humans pair off with a sexual partner in a religious/legal relationship, allowing them easy access to sexual satisfaction that is all but univerally preferred to masterbation.

      AHahhahahahahaha! You've obviously never been married.

    19. Re:Privacy by oboreruhito · · Score: 1

      Great, just what we need. More people jacking off in the subway.

    20. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to also agree with the others that your notion is way off base. I have never known any man to even consider stopping masturbation after getting into a committed relationship. I have been in a relationship for 5 years, and on the average I do it several times per week... sometimes more, sometimes less, depending on the week. I would be FLOORED if I ever talked to a guy who said that once he got serious/married, he didn't really feel like masturbating anymore. It's just so wrong... it's naive almost to the point of being on par with when people didn't know what the female orgasm was.

    21. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why prostitution should be legal, widespread and well-regulated (for health purposes). It should be completely above ground, and prostitutes should be respected for the socially valuable services they provide.

    22. Re:Privacy by rasactive · · Score: 0

      If you think people stop masturbating when they get into sexual relationships, you're pretty fucking retarded.

    23. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At upwards of $20 for a pay-per-view porno in a hotel room, and with most "corporate" laptops locked down and/or monitored, who would want to risk getting caught playing pr0n on his employer's laptop? Business travellers are a prime market for this.

    24. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can someone tell me why the frick I was too stupid to use the "Preview" feature?

      Uh, a prenatal crack habit left you with only a 50/50 chance of hitting the shift key?

    25. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus if you wait until you get home, you can watch your pr0n on a 19" LCD rather than a small ipod screen..

    26. Re:Privacy by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      "Here's what I don't get: who would watch porn on an iPod?"

      Hi. Are you a fucking human? People will watch porn on ANYTHING.

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    27. Re:Privacy by name*censored* · · Score: 1

      This post makes the assumption that there's a relationship between high libido and high demand for attention (as in public exhibitionists, etc). There are probably tens of thousands of people worldwide that can't make it through their day without a conference with mr. winky, but are otherwise normal people with the normal amount of humility/dignity/whatever. You can't typecast people, because 99 times out of 100 there's always people who are different

      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    28. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, my husband *never* masturbates. *eyeroll*

      Neither do I, for that matter. *shiftyeyes*

    29. Re:Privacy by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      AHahhahahahahaha! You've obviously never been married.

      1/3/98. 6:30 pm. And every minute of every hour of every day since.

      You obviously married the wrong person.

  18. iPod pr0n by lastberserker · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Bad publicity has never stopped the black sheep of the industry. If any small company sees profit there, it will pornify any device.

    Agreed. And in the true spirit of the platform they will call it iPorn or iPr0n or something...

    --
    My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
  19. Censorship? by SonicBlue · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, come on now, sex sells. And, anyway, why would you sell a product that's not letting the customer use it for whatever they want? As soon as the product leaves the company, the company has nothing to do with what it's used for. Censorship is always worse than the content being censored. Just like with everything else, there is a way of getting around it -- there's a guide on how to convert pornographic material so it can still be put on iPods. I wish companies put their money on improving the features rather than to stop the customers from using it for whatever they want.

    Soon monitors will be banned because they're used to view porn.

    1. Re:Censorship? by MoonFog · · Score: 1

      Soon monitors will be banned because they're used to view porn.

      Yeah, and the FBI will get an anti-porn task force! Oh, wait...

  20. Potential content? by Impeesa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I suspect there wasn't a lot of potential there in the first place. Pr0n is popular on computers, dvd players, and magazines in the bathroom, because they're available in the comfort of your own home. I don't know about the rest of you, but I doubt I'd load my iPod up with pr0n just for the convenience of stopping for a quick pull in a public restroom.

    1. Re:Potential content? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      But I'm sure some people would consider it great for the bathroom as an alternative for those magazines they always have to clear away when they get guests...

    2. Re:Potential content? by MisterSquid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt I'd load my iPod up with pr0n just for the convenience of stopping for a quick pull in a public restroom

      Yeah, I hear what you're saying: public places present a problem if you're mostly sane and flying solo. A better use of the iPod video could be for times when you're with someone in public and both of you are looking to look together. That could be a real turn on and could lead to healthy if somewhat exhibitionistic and/or mildly indiscreet sexy stuff. On the other hand, and you can see what might be putting the chill on the porn industry, imagine a perv who sits next to an outdoor yoga class and queues "Yoga Yolanda Flexes for Felix" for a quick trip to augmented reality. I won't even go to the nightmares of sex-anxious parents who worry that Billy might show Susie "something neat" on his iPod behind the gym.

      I think portable video is inevitable, but I also think that there will be sensationalized stories of the uses and abuses of portable video, too. What I'm wondering is what happens when cameras, wireless, and portable display devices combine to produce a users' revolution in video journalism, not porn, but politics.

      --
      blog
  21. Flint Michigan? by dzafez · · Score: 1

    I have heard that before. Ah "Bowling for Columbine" Really, from a international point of view this little town got a lot of media, allready.

  22. How it normally works by putko · · Score: 3, Funny

    A review of the porn business quickly reveals a pattern: some greedy guy (conincidentally enough, he's almost always a Jew) spots an opportunity to make a killing selling something a bit beyond the Pale.

    First it was "dirty books" and black and white softcore photos -- much later hardcore, gangbangs, bukkake and goatse style stuff. The guy starts making money -- and voila, porn is everywhere and he's filthy rich.

    If nobody steps up to the plate, I'm going to make it happen. I will be the Reuben Sturman of the iPod, damnit!

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:How it normally works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A review of the porn business quickly reveals a pattern: some greedy guy (conincidentally enough, he's almost always a Jew) spots an opportunity to make a killing selling something a bit beyond the Pale.

      WTF? Which is what I might say about this whole thread. Get a sexual partner, boys. You can even do it from the command line:

      apt-get a-life

  23. The really reason should be ... by Stormtrooper386 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the screen is to small and frankly do you really want porn on the move, personally I listen to music in public, it's less likely to get me arrested.

    1. Re:The really reason should be ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      This reminds of a time I was stopped behind a Ford Explorer at a red light. While behind, I noticed he had two of those flip-down LCD screens (was all the rage back in 2001) playing video of pr0n. Needless to say, it ended with a nice "money shot" facial. ...and it's at this point I stopped drinking my milkshake I got a few blocks down the road from Sonic.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:The really reason should be ... by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why are there so many "adult" magazines at the newstands in airport terminals? It's up around 50% if you include the likes of maxim and cosmo. Obviously, public spaces (indeed confined public spaces) are no problem for quite a few people.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:The really reason should be ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      " ... the screen is to small "

      That ends up being really important in porn. Not as much for the viewer but for the stars. That two inch screen can't be that flattering...

  24. Oh dear by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

    No piPod ..

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh wow, that was so clever.. NOT

      retard

    2. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello Kaiser , YOU FAIL IT.
      1/10 boring troll

    3. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's call it the iProd instead. ouch

  25. Quote by ceeam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As someone said: "America is a strange country, you cannot have a breast shown on TV there unless it has been cut off". (Sorry, it's a re-translation).

    1. Re:Quote by ClamIAm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Similar:

      "You can cut off a breast, but not kiss it."

      --Bruce Campbell

    2. Re:Quote by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I don't remember seeing a cut off breast on TV, or anywhere else, for that matter.

    3. Re:Quote by multipartmixed · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Try looking under Nancy Reagan's shirt.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    4. Re:Quote by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      that's not nice

    5. Re:Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try the Food Network genius... chicken breast?

    6. Re:Quote by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      GP gets the insightful when Parent deserves it more... ahh such is Karma... such a fickle mistress

      unlike the girls on my iPod, not fickle at all... happy to please ;) :P

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  26. Re:I'm sorry, but no by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    Porn is on DVD now? Why the hell am I rewinding this tape.

  27. How is iPod porn special? by badzilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't have an iPod, with or without video, but how is it you need special pay-per porn movies? Couldn't you just download regular free porn movies and load them on? Movies or TV shows work great on mobile phones (have to convert them to .3GP format first) so why not iPod?

    --
    "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    1. Re:How is iPod porn special? by Skythe · · Score: 1

      , ipod porn!

  28. Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 0, Troll

    The lawyers for the ACLU will make it possible. The rest will run it under our radars. Porn is coming. It's soul destroying legal sh** because it's free speech. There's no constitutional way to shoot this garbage down. The only way is if everyone turns away. So sad to see our freedom turned on it's head this way. Porn. Porn. Porn. Make your choice.

    1. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by davmoo · · Score: 1

      Okay, so you don't want to view porn. That's fine. You shouldn't have to if you don't want to.

      But I bet you'll be happy to see the ACLU and its lawyers when someone tries to block something you do want to see.

      Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword...the things you don't like get the same protection as the things you do like. The Constitution is funny like that.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    2. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by djflipstarx · · Score: 1

      Oh honestly. You may view it as garbage, but sex sells. Plus, it's sad that people would see porn as garbage but not mention anything about rampant violence.

      --
      Y helo thar
    3. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by MBraynard · · Score: 1
      The thing about violence is when you take a normal person, being exposed to real violence makes you want to encounter it less. Halo is not real violence. Being in a crowd during a drive-by is.

      A normal person exposed to pr0n, however, can be aroused and is more likely to become addicted to it and to have it change the way they perceive members of the opposite sex.

    4. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I think the Bible is soul destroying legal sh**. I'm not crying about the lack of a ban on that junk because I realise what the consequences of allowing censorship is.

    5. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by gringer · · Score: 1

      soul destroying legal sh**

      You do realise you can say 'shit' here? Slashdot is unlikely to censor posts that contain words like shit unless they are completely pointless posts otherwise.

      --
      Ask me about repetitive DNA
    6. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats simply not true. Studies have shown that many people exposed to voilence in the media become desensitised to it. It has been correlated with kids willing to act out more agressively in school and even to the point of trying to repeat what they have seen on TV/films.

    7. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      But I bet you'll be happy to see the ACLU and its lawyers when someone tries to block something you do want to see.

      Like say, Rush Limbaugh?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by sulli · · Score: 1

      So you still use Betamax then?

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    9. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by sulli · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The Bible is full of porn. Erotica at least. I demand literal interpretation of the Word of God!

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    10. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      certianly, slashdot is a place where you can talkk about whatever the cukf you want, saying whatever you like about the shit going on in the world.

      Theres shit going on everywhere, everyone shits out their ass.

      Cept those bag people with the shit out the side... creeepy shits they are.

      then theres the people that shit out the mouth. you know those ones. that talk all that shit.

      ahh what a big fat pile of shity shit gets shat out there in teh wide shity world.

      on as side note

      *here resides an ascii art composed entirely of the word shit spelling the word shit, that was killed by the slashdot post filter for repetition and whitespace... damn you*

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    11. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Exactly. As someone else's sig says, "Religion is a gateway psychosis."

      (For those who don't know, this is a direct response to the moral majority non-scientists who state that "pot is a gateway drug".)

      It would be interesting if every time a group attempted to restrict the freedom of speech guaranteed by our Constitution, we all ganged up and asked the government to restrict the freedom of speech of the instruction book they're using to bully us (i.e., the Bible, Koran, etc).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:Try and stop it... it's so unfortunate. by MBraynard · · Score: 1

      I think I just became desensitized to bad grammar and spelling.

  29. RTFA? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speaking of povpod, isn't that a link form the article? I believe it also said something about SuicideGirls. RTFA?

    1. Re:RTFA? by adpowers · · Score: 1

      Yeah, suicide girls has an iPod-formatted video podcast right on their homepage (and it is aimed specifically at the iPod). I ran into their website today and thought that was freakin' awesome. Once I clear up some HD space, I'll have to subscribe. Also, here is another article about porn on the iPod. I forwarded that to my mom.

  30. size matters by TheSloth2001ca · · Score: 5, Funny

    2.5 inches just aint enough for me

    --
    Just another crappy blog
  31. In apple by Skythe · · Score: 1

    the ipod eats porn?

  32. Lazy Journalism by Erik+K.+Veland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They've talked to exactly 1 (one) company distributing adult films. Wow! And of how many exactly? Actually several have jumped on already - a mere week after the new iPod was shipped to users! This is a non-story of tabloid bullshit, but I would expect no less of Slashdot than to rehash it I'm sorry to say :(

    --
    "I tend to think of OS X as Linux with QA and Taste", James Gosling, creator of Java
  33. Remember that movie? by Jack+Earl · · Score: 5, Funny
    I believe jeff Goldblum said, "Porn will find a way."

    A few scenes later and he is in the back of a jeep with a busted leg driving away from a raging vagina monster.

  34. Good by nate+nice · · Score: 1

    Way to police yourself. It's your responsibility.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  35. No Pr0n for you, ipod! by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 0

    *Ipod looks guilty and retreats into a corner while deleting all it's pr0n*

    Later it will jump up into your lap looking for affection and re-assurance.

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  36. Total Marketing Genius by Che+Guevarra · · Score: 1

    Again, Steve kicks all your asses. Values baby.

  37. First off... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Fayling emphasized the pitfalls of combining a device designed for younger audiences with content they are prohibited from viewing."

    Let me be the first to say it, but... Get the FUCK outta here! This coming from the industry that exploits the 18 to 21 year old genre?

    Yeah, right....

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  38. Re:Lazy Journalism [Z.I.N.S. -- Zonk is not Slashd by putko · · Score: 1

    but I would expect no less of Slashdot than to rehash it

    It is a bit more precise to say "Zonk" (or l'il Zonky, as his fans call him) than Slashdot. L'il Zonky has a habit of taking PR pieces, old news and generally unimportant crap and putting it up on Slashdot. Some of the other editors are quite good.

    I recommend you keep Z.I.N.S in mind -- "Zonk is not Slashdot."

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  39. Damn by Orionetheus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Introducing the all new iPorn. Wank Different.

    --
    To each his own.
  40. Why buy an iPod? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    There's iAudio x5 that beats the shit out of iPods all day...has an fm tuner, line in recording, video, supports MP3, OGG, WMA, ASF, FLAC, WAV, MPEG4, JPG, TXT, AVI and it's comperably priced. Oh, and you can use it with windows, Linux and a mac. http://eng.iaudio.com/

    No, I don't work for them - but I love mine.

    --
    ymmv
    1. Re:Why buy an iPod? by usv · · Score: 1

      Looks sweeet. According to the manual, it can even operate in directory-driven mode! Just the thing I've been looking for. What can you say about the UI as a user? Now, if there only was a SDK available...

      Mods: Why this was modded as flamebait? This product seems IMHO very reasonable.

    2. Re:Why buy an iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's not flamebait, it's offtopic. Now if he was talking about porn instead...

    3. Re:Why buy an iPod? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      The ui is great, just the one toggle on the front. It is more powerful than appears at first and many features are not even listed in the specs. You start to notice all of the subtle stuff once you get the manual.

      I purchased mine BEFORE the video ipod came out. I bought it specifically because there wasn't ipod video available, and I dislike the closed nature of the ipod. Additionally they already have a successor to the x5 called the a2 due out soon, which even the most zealous of iPod lovers have to admit blows the iPod away. http://www.cowonamerica.com/products/cowon/a2/ Yeah, the ipod video has ALMOST caught up to their old offering, but it isn't even close to their a2.

      --
      ymmv
  41. Get Your iPod Porn right here -- for free by putko · · Score: 1

    If you read the article, you'll find these guys, who have "point of view" porn. Their concept sounds good -- the format of the porn is meant to correspond to the type of experience you'll have while masturbating with your iPod -- or maybe that's just the kind of orn you get when you make a cheapo porn movie with one guy holding a camera, for the duration of the whole flick.

    The stuff is free, so download away. I'm sure the pornographers will appreciate the Slashdot market knowing about their fine product -- it is their crowd of early adopters.

    Whippee -- everybody, get out your khock and balls and whack away!! (that's an Adam Sandler reference).

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
  42. Here's one for ya: by drunkensmiter · · Score: 1

    So you toss a porn movie or two on the iPod to wank it in the bathroom or whatever. What happens when your friends and girlfriend inevitably want to toy around with the thing?

    1. Re:Here's one for ya: by msdschris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just make sure you get a washable cover for your ipod so when your friends "borrow" it to toy around you can clean it easily.

  43. Is it difficult? by polaralex · · Score: 1

    Well, is it difficult to pass porn from your PC to iPod? Transcode your PC porn and transfer them... Also, come on now! Is it so nessecairy to view porn ALL DAY??

    --
    http://polaralex.blogspot.com http://www.polaralex.tk *Define Reality*..*
    1. Re:Is it difficult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes?

  44. They don't want to prey on youth? by trash+eighty · · Score: 1, Troll

    But those are often the best porn movies!

    1. Re:They don't want to prey on youth? by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      im sure the boys in blue will be knocking soon to discuss ur favourite styles...

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  45. I live in Flint, MI by abaddon3k · · Score: 1

    I remember when Williamson (our mayor, who is a convicted felon btw) passed that law. I laughed hard, i heard it on the radio in the morning. Can't fix our screwed up roads, or our crime problems, but sure as hell can stop us from watching porn in our cars.

  46. Conflicting reports by radmongoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was interesting to read this article after just last night hearing a short news blurb on my local CBS affiliate about the porn industry is "embracing" the new iPod with man on the street interviews with people who don't like the idea of having the "guy sitting next to them in class looking at porn," and overarching implications that parents should be alarmed and ready to take up arms to defend their kids' innocence.

    Other perspectives:
    Pornographers embracing iPod
    Will iPod Be Eye for Porn?
    Harness iPod's dollar power -- porn on the go
    How do you know Apple's new device will succeed? iPod Porn
    Apple iPod delivers "iPorno" revolution

    1. Re:Conflicting reports by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      they'd rather the guy next to them had a laptop to view porn, since it's much harder to surrendipitously get a peek at those little iPod screens

  47. Uh, it already exists. . . by Iron_Yuppie · · Score: 0

    povpod.com already has pr0n for your iPod. It's a podcast you can subscribe to for FREE (as in beer). . . .or did I miss the point or something?

  48. dont believe the hype... by marx2002 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    thats really too funny, i found another alternative people. Remember cuseeme ? i found a free java reflector that works on most any machine with java enabled.Cuseeme was the worlds first real video multiconferencing chat application with nearly 500.000 users till whitepine fucked it up , mean dont release the source code. So check my free site and download it , You just need a dnydns account and you up in minutes on you standart DSL line This is no advertising i have no financial interest i just want to bring this great programm back. so cu soon pace from germany

  49. Kids have iPods? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    I seem to think that its the opposite. Although they may market the iPod as device for young, cool people, very few young people have them. This especially holds true for the more expensive units such as the video iPod. Not a lot of parents are willing to shell out $300 so their kids can listen to music. I know I never had anything that extravagant as a kid. Most people I see with iPods are 20+. More kids have TVs and DVD players in their rooms. That doesn't stop them from producing porn on DVD.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Kids have iPods? by JasonEngel · · Score: 2, Informative
      Although they may market the iPod as device for young, cool people, very few young people have them.

      What rock have you been living under? My wife works at a high school, and on several occasions last year I was there during the school day between classes. As a very rough estimate, I'd say at least a quarter of the kids had the telltale white cords dangling from their ears while walking in the hallway.

      And who says their parents are buying these for them? While a lot of kids probably get them as gifts, I bet most of them have summer and after-school jobs and bought their iPods with their own money.

      And the younger kids? My 7-yr-old has an iPod shuffle that I got for him. He wasn't the first kid in his second grade class to have one either. He gets to listen to it while doing his homework.

      I supposed it depends on the community you live in. Teens in blue-collar towns probably are less likely to have one.

    2. Re:Kids have iPods? by be-fan · · Score: 1

      I dunno. At my brother's highschool, every other kid has an iPod.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Kids have iPods? by AlphaDecay · · Score: 1

      As a high school teacher myself I can say close to 25% of kids have an ipod of some format. I'd say between 30-50% of kids have a music player going at some point during the day. Heck in just my classes alone I know of a handful of kids that already have video ipods.

      --AlphaDecay

    4. Re:Kids have iPods? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd say at least a quarter of the kids had the telltale white cords dangling from their ears while walking in the hallway.

      Maybe it's a wealthy school, but unless kids have changed since I was in high school, a significant fraction of those kids only owned a white cord. Kids do the silliest things to look cool (where "cool" is defined as having wealthy parents, of course).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Kids have iPods? by Jerry+Rivers · · Score: 1

      "Kids do the silliest things to look cool."

      Surely you're not suggesting that a significant number of kids fake having iPod earbuds.

      --
      The pursuit of absolute tolerance leads to the most rigorous and ludicrous intolerance. - REX MURPHY
    6. Re:Kids have iPods? by lgw · · Score: 1

      I'd say 1/4 of the kids in my high school had fake cell phones, back in the day. Fake status symbols are (or at least were) popular in poor schools. For a while, there was a fashion of wearing new clothing with the price tag still attached, which in turn led to stealing expensive price tags to attach to cheap clothing! As I said, the silliest things. A white earplug and a $20 CD player is a nice fake status symbol.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  50. I went to buy a pornPod the moment by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    I went to buy a pornPod the moment I learned they now support pictures. I winked at the girl behind the counter and asked her to sell me a model fit for my person. She sold me a nano. :(

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. And magazines have safegaurds? by pstreck · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Without safeguards you open yourself up to more scrutiny from government and parents' groups."
    And can someone please explain me to how an opaque plastic bag sitting behind the 7-11's counter is an adequate safegaurd? I mean personally I could care less if you want porn on you xyz device or not, but content control of digital pornography has been handled very well throughout the Internet boom, so why should it be any different for the iPod--end rant
    --

    Later,
    Phil
  52. So revealing ... by smoker2 · · Score: 1
    I don't know why, but virtually every comment has to do with jerking off at the sight of a bit of pr0n.

    Does no-one appreciate the artistic value anymore ?

    Now if you really want a wank, I've heard Van Gogh is pretty good !

    1. Re:So revealing ... by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I just had a thought...

      I've decided to patent an upside down urinal !

      It will be fitted with a flatscreen and coin operated, for your ultimate pleasure .

      Wankers ! Wankers ! Wankers !

  53. To pornographers & anyone who cherishes freedo by smagruder · · Score: 1

    The children will be entirely safe once freedom is entirely destroyed.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  54. Re:Terry Schiavo Announces Support for GNAA by notthe9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At least you can identify it as a troll. The current modding on it is "flaimbait," which is what brought it into my threshold. Not nearly as interested in trolls as baits.

  55. iCandy by Ranger · · Score: 2, Informative

    You mean these iPorn adverts aren't real? iPorn Portable HDD iPod/iPorn. Boy, that'll disappoint a lot of slashdotters.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  56. yawn by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    has an fm tuner, line in recording

    And for the people who need those two things, cool. The vast majority of people could not care less, as evidenced by what players sell in the millions and those that don't.

    supports MP3, OGG, WMA, ASF, FLAC, WAV, MPEG4, JPG, TXT, AVI

    The iPod supports MP3, WAV, AAC, Apple lossless, JPG, H.264, MPEG4, Audible, and text. One big feature of AAC that the iAudio misses out on is bookmarking. You start listening to an AAC podcast or audiobook, and it will remember where you stopped listening.

    The iPod plays video at 30 fps while the iAudio only manages 15. The iPod also has larger capacity, longer battery life, and a display with three times the resolution of the iAudio's, while being smaller, lighter and thinner. You can also hook up an iPod to a TV to watch your videos...I see no mention of that feature on iAudio's site. Finally, the iAudio's controls look pretty poor next to the Clickwheel.

    There's iAudio x5 that beats the shit out of iPods all day

    Whatever you say, Baghdad Bob. Unless you really need audio recording, the iPod quite clearly spanks the iAudio on all fronts.

    1. Re:yawn by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Unless you really need audio recording, the iPod quite clearly spanks the iAudio on all fronts.

      The new iPod with Video will do 44.1khz stereo audio recording, so the iPod spanks the iAudio even if you do need audio recording.

    2. Re:yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, I'm heterosexual, and therefore not allow to buy or use Apple products. I'll be sure to check the iAudio out! Some of us don't need anally insertable consumer products, strange as that may sound to an Apple fagboy.

    3. Re:yawn by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      Didn't know that. :) So it looks like it's down to the FM tuner.

    4. Re:yawn by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
      The iPod supports MP3, WAV, AAC, Apple lossless, JPG, H.264, MPEG4, Audible, and text.

      No OGG? Then you can't even listen to Wikipedia. What do people use these things for?

    5. Re:yawn by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I'm heterosexual,

      It's only sad for the women you encounter.

      and therefore not allow to buy or use Apple products.

      You're allowed to buy them. You just can't afford them.

      I'll be sure to check the iAudio out! Some of us don't need anally insertable consumer products, strange as that may sound to an Apple fagboy.

      Since the iPod with video is 2.4" wide, you must be the goatse.cx guy. Sure, you can anally insert something 2.4" wide and your "heterosexual." Whatever you say...

      P.S. This is the first Apple product that I have ever bought and I was into personal computers when the Apple II was introducted. The difference between us is that I buy products based on their quality, design, and features while you buy them to try to convince people that you're straight.

    6. Re:yawn by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      No OGG? Then you can't even listen to Wikipedia.

      Oh. Darn.

  57. Missing the big picture... by shrapnull · · Score: 1

    So what if the industry stays away from it? One of iPod/vPod/ITMS strengths is in 'x-casting', whether it be audio/video or what have you. That will make it more of an amateur review platform, make it very low quality with very realistic views, and make it immensly more popular then anything the bigwigs have to offer just for the sake of it being somewhat "underground." Not to mention the vPod-casts in this arena that I've found so far are *free*, with RSS Feeds to keep me posted as to when it's been updated. I can see that the industry's "product" will never be offered through ITMS and they have to interest in high-volume inexpensive distribution (just rent a movie in a hotel room if you want to see their prime business model $$$). So in the mean time, relax. Sex may sell, but in the realm of vPod it can also be free or very inexpensive to satisfy those natural urges. And the fact that it plays music and TV shows as well, gives you ample opportunity to cuddle with yourself while basking in the afterglow.

    --
    If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
  58. Articles that say the opposite of this one by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The submissions says pornographers are staying away, but I've been reading the opposite conclusion in the past few weeks:

    iPod Porn Now Available

    Apple iPod delivers "iPorno" revolution

    I think it's silly to think pornographers won't be taking advantage of the iPod. Millions of people have them, and millions would love to have porn on them. It's easy business.

    --
    "Sufferin' succotash."
  59. I know by JPriest · · Score: 1

    I wish I could be 17 or 18 the rest of my life :) Waste not your time with porn and /. young iPod usrs.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:I know by Sqwubbsy · · Score: 1

      I wish I could be 17 or 18 the rest of my life :) Waste not your time with porn and /. young iPod usrs.

      Like YOU were getting laid when you were that age.

  60. What he said by sulli · · Score: 1

    Exactly. They'll just distribute the vids in iPod friendly format and let the buyers/users/pirates do whatever they want with them.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  61. SuicideGirls PornCast by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 1

    I believe it also said something about SuicideGirls.

    Which is right here

    --
    R(k)
  62. Guilt by Proxy? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's say for a second that this guy is right in regards to his fears of "preying upon children" and whatnot. Now that iPod Video exists, does this mean all porno sites dealing in content playable in Quicktime now risk being accused of making their content readily available to minors in an iPod-compatible format?

    I would not be surprised if someone at Microsoft is spreading the FUD on this one to scare the industry into converting their offerings entirely to Windows Media format. Porno will ultimately decide which media format will remain on top... everything else is simply along for the ride.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  63. Maybe I get your reference... by heinousjay · · Score: 1

    You think that's hard, try polishing the one-eyed gopher at the same time.

    --
    Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    1. Re:Maybe I get your reference... by RevWhite · · Score: 0

      Bloodhound Gang isn't anywhere near obscure enough. . .let's try again.

      --
      Hey, can I bum a sig?
  64. Pfft by Archon-X · · Score: 2, Informative

    What can I say:
    Here are two to start it off

    http://www.povpod.com/main.php
    http://www.ipodporn.com/

    The article is full of rubbish.

    Just like PSP porn, I'm sure this will fill its niche nicely.

  65. Poddify? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

    How long someone makes a one click Poddify* application. I imagine an FFMPEG based application where you simply could drag and drop any movie and it creates a suitable Video iPod file. The idea is that you would have nothing to tweak and it would do all the magic of deciding the right settings for you.

    *I reserve no rights on the name

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  66. American Porn Industry by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

    While the extremist Christian right in the U.S. (AKA the American Taliban) will exert pressure on the porn industry and legislators to keep porn off of the iPod, there will be many overseas porn producers who will gladly fill that market niche.

    In Europe, children might catch a glimpse a 2.5" screen showing people having sex. In the U.S., children will be able to see, on large-screen home theatre systems, Fear Factor episodes where people eat live spiders, worms, and slugs, drink cow bile, eat coagulated blood, and bite open -- and drink the liquid from -- cow's eyes. After they tire of that, they can watch people get brutally murdered in countless television shows and movies.

    Boy, those poor kids in Europe are going to be scarred for life...

    1. Re:American Porn Industry by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 1

      Ditto that. This is a strange country we live in. I find it disturbing that nobody seems nearly as upset by all of the violent imagery that children are subjected to. It's pretty sad, really.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    2. Re:American Porn Industry by fmaxwell · · Score: 1

      This is a strange country we live in. I find it disturbing that nobody seems nearly as upset by all of the violent imagery that children are subjected to. It's pretty sad, really.

      Agreed.

      But let's not ignore the non-violent, but disgusting and disturbing images that American children see. What is more deviant: Two people having sex or people eating live slugs and drinking cow bile until they vomit?

    3. Re:American Porn Industry by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I find it disturbing that nobody seems nearly as upset by all of the violent imagery that children are subjected to

      I think that is am extremely unfair characteristic. I believe that probably all adults who find sex on TV to be objectionable would also find violance on TV objectionable. In fact, a brief web search turns up this Rocky Mountain Family Council report on TV Violence and they state that over 80 of families surveyed feel that there is too much violence on TV.

      In fact, I've never heard of any person or group who finds the amount of sex on TV objectionable to also feel that there is not a problem with the amount of violence in TV. Perhaps you'd like to elaborate on your statement.

      -Brent
  67. Mainstream? by mhollis · · Score: 1

    From the article:

    ... pornographers eagerly jump on new technology long before it goes mainstream

    One could argue that the iPod is mainstream and the liklyhood of the Video iPod being mainstream from the outset. It is very easy to convert any video from Quicktime to the codecs that the video iPod will work with and, if one has the right compression tool, like Sorensen's tools, one could convert from WMF or just about anything else.

    People in the porn industry are pretty happy with the money they're making presently off of girlie pictures and salacious downloadable movies of sex acts from the routine to the insane. The codecs that the video iPod wants to use are not really high quality so pornographers are counting on the individual to do their own converting from the higher-quality that they sell to the lower quality usable on the video iPod.

    I have heard some discussion from friends of mine in the television industry about putting one's demo reel on a video iPod and most prefer a larger screen, like the one on the Play Station Portable. I believe it can play back a wider range of codecs and plays in much higher quality.

    There all ready exist portable pr0n playback devices. They are called "laptops." I have seen people using them to play back DVD movies. I have never seen anyone playing back anything other than a general-release film. And one can fully understand why they are not playing back the gigabytes of pr0n (undoubtedly) on their laptops because they are not in the privacy of their own home. One tends to think of sexual acts in private, not public.

    I occasionally wince at the laws being passed by the various states that are designed to prevent the playing of pornographic material in cars. When I'm in a car, I'm thinking about the road and the scenery around the road. And if I'm driving, I'm really just not going to watch anything than the road and my mirrors. That's pretty much it. I suppose there are kooks out there that think they can drive while watching something but I think they would quickly wind up in the hospital -- either excited or not excited about the video they just watched (probably not excited if they were badly injured). I think this is yet another example about how the attentions of our legislatures have been diverted from the service of the public to some strange obsessions.

    iPods are great portable music devices. Not great video devices because the screens are low resolution and tiny. Porn is something that is generally consumed in the privacy of one's home. Kind of reduces the whole enjoyment factor if one is out in public.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    1. Re:Mainstream? by argent · · Score: 1

      When I'm in a car, I'm thinking about the road and the scenery around the road. And if I'm driving, I'm really just not going to watch anything than the road and my mirrors. That's pretty much it. I suppose there are kooks out there that think they can drive while watching something but I think they would quickly wind up in the hospital -- either excited or not excited about the video they just watched (probably not excited if they were badly injured).

      I know this is unusual in the US, but in many parts of the world it's quite common for there to be people in cars who are not actually driving the car. There's even a name for them... passengers.

    2. Re:Mainstream? by mhollis · · Score: 1

      And you think that is not going to distract the driver?

      Frankly, I'm against children watching disney movies in the car. I can see the lawsuits now for the soiled carpets and carseats as they all upchuck because they're getting carsick.

      Motion sickness is easily reduced, if not eliminated by looking at the horizon. It may be induced by reading or watching something using close vision in a moving vehicle that is noticeably moving

      Carsickness is a serious driver distraction. Been there, done that.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
    3. Re:Mainstream? by argent · · Score: 1

      And you think that is not going to distract the driver?

      Well, that depends. If the passenger is in the front seat and has the audio from the movie fed through an external speaker and is waving the display at the driver, hell yes.

      If the passenger isn't in the front seat, or if the passenger isn't deliberately drawing attention to what they're watching, no. As you say, "... if I'm driving, I'm really just not going to watch anything than the road and my mirrors. That's pretty much it. I suppose there are kooks out there that think they can drive while watching something...".

      Carsickness is a serious driver distraction.

      That's as may be, but I don't see the connection with "...kooks out there that think they can drive while watching something...".

    4. Re:Mainstream? by mhollis · · Score: 1

      Frankly, these laws are "Nanny State" laws, where the government is seen as being your parental unit or a substitute for that (hence, "Nanny"). If you are in the back of a limousine and you're playing porn movies with the partition rolled up, nobody is distracted, nobody on the road sees your monitor (as limos generally have their windows heavily tinted) and nobody cares. But I can just see someone being driven along and a cop stopping them because he sees the driver doing something wrong (or thinks he sees wrongness) then arrests the couple in the back watching porn after popping open the back door.

      Sensible people who ride motorcycles wear helmets. Helmet laws in various states are seen as "too restrictive." Yet states with no helmet laws have seatbelt laws and those same laws -- designed to protect -- are not seen as too restrictive.

      I don't drive with any movie, porn or Disney, in the car. I don't want to. This is the same as not riding a motorcycle without a helmet. Law or no law, both to me don't seem sensible.

      --
      Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  68. Re:the freak icon's purpose! (quick, mod down!) by adpowers · · Score: 1

    Hehe, okay. I don't actually use the system to mod down posts from my 'foes', I just use it as a marking of someone who has said something I didn't like. I can't remember all the reasons I foe people, but some include if they support that Russian music site and don't understand copyright. If someone unfairly bashes Apple ("The iTMS sucks. I'll only use it when songs cost 10 cents without DRM. Anyone who uses it now is an idiot."), etc. If you promote UN take over of the internet or more government control of our life, I might also make you a foe.

    Think of it this way, I have so many foes, that it must not take much to get on my foe list (there fore decreasing the severity of the foe list). Again, I don't mod posts from foes down (using /.'s preferences) because they'll say informative stuff sometimes, but it just serves as a warning to me.

    Andrew

    PS: Not like you'll ever read this since you posted AC and will probably forget about it, but oh well.

  69. Misplaced Comma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would have been better if the title read:

    No, Porn for you ipod

  70. kids with ipods? by sevinkey · · Score: 1

    And since when are parents buy $300 portable music devices for their kids? I had to save money to buy myself a $25 walkman when I was a kid :P

    Probably the same parents giving their 11 year olds cell phones.

  71. Jeopardy! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    "Fayling emphasized the pitfalls of combining a device designed for younger audiences with content they are prohibited from..."

    Alex my answer is "What would a tobacco executive never say?"

  72. Or maybe they want profit by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    The real reason no one wants to sell porn (or any other video) for tiny portable devices, is that you would only have 12 customers. Who wants to watch video on a tiny little portable device?

    Oh, I know who. It's the guy who says, "Well, that stretch of road is so boring. I need something to watch on my long commute." The problem with those customers, is that they only buy once and then they suddenly leave the market in a kinetic smear.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  73. iPorn is born by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't matter if p0rn, inc., markets directly to the iPod or not. It's about as easy to make your existing non-WMV p0rn "iPod ready" via Quicktime as it is to use iTunes to rip CD tracks.

    The record labels never marketed their CD's as "iPod compatible" but that didn't prevent anyone from filling up their iPods with CD tracks.

  74. Hrm, this link looks awfully suspicious, then by mactari · · Score: 1

    http://suicidegirls.com/ipod/

    Suicide Girls is the site that's somehow managed to get itself to be considered, at least in some fringe academic[esque] conferences I've been attending that tend to deal with pop culture and [others more specifically on] video games, some strange sort of 'woman's lib porn', where women with 'non-standard' body profiles (which apparently means that it's not "Beautiful young women" but the much more liberating, "Beautiful young women with tattoos and piercings") are in the spreads, apparently without any men. They have blogs where they talk with site members, etc, which I believe is to make it harder to objectify them, and there was apparently some shindig a while back where some of them quit the site for some reason but their pictures and blogs stayed online. But enough about some lame excuse 'explaining' why I'm still a morally just person for looking at women without their clothes on.

    In any event, it's a porn site (don't ask me to describe it, but, by virtue of being human, I apparently have the innate ability to know it when I see it) and you can download videos to your iPod and even subscribe to a video podcast. I can only imagine other sites will, at some point, have a giant black monolith fall in their backyard so that they too can figure out how to make .m4v's as well.

    Porn ignoring video iPods indeed. Rubbish. If it's a medium, it's been used to transmit porn.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  75. pr0n on the TI-92+ by qbasicnewbie · · Score: 1

    Porn on the iPod? That's nothing! I've got porn on my TI-92+ :)

  76. Here is some ipod porn (its free too) by luthe · · Score: 1
  77. iWank by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1
    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  78. new cover for Ipod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If porn does make it to the Ipod I would appreciate a rubber slipon case to protect it from....ahhh...spills and stuff. Something that would protect if let's say I shake up a can of soda and accidently spray it at the Ipod while watching porn. Yeah...soda.

  79. Suicide girls by r2q2 · · Score: 1

    Suicide girls has a video iPod blog which is syndicated.

    --
    My UID is prime is yours?
  80. Funny you ask that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  81. If it's visible to the public by pjc50 · · Score: 1

    Showing porn in your car makes it visible to other people not in your car, especially when you're stationary.

    1. Re:If it's visible to the public by F�an�ro · · Score: 1

      But there already are laws against showing porn in public, aren't there?

      The main problem i have is how there could be a large enough number of people that watch porn movies in cars to require a special law for it

  82. next iPod to have built-in vibrator by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Its small enough to put near interesting parts of the anatomy without difficulty and detection. As the iPod acquires more functionality, this one could open new markets.

  83. Re:the freak icon's purpose! (quick, mod down!) by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 1

    Thanks, that was a good answwer.