Slashdot Mirror


MozCorp Announces Firefox 1.5 Extension Competition

vain gloria writes "The Mozilla Corporation has launched a competition to Extend Firefox by developing an innovative new extension for the soon-to-be-released latest version of their popular browser. The competition runs until January 6th and the three big prizes are Foxified Alienware PCs. Keen developers may want to grab a copy of the 1.5 Release Candidate and get a head start. Better check your passports first though, as those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter."

260 comments

  1. if that is necessary... by TheWart · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Better check your passports first though, as those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter."


    On second thought, if that is necessary for you to remember where you live, then maybe you shouldn't be entering the contest.

    1. Re:if that is necessary... by cozzano · · Score: 0

      On second thought, if that is necessary for you to remember where you live, then maybe you shouldn't be entering the contest.

      location = @"EU"; No problem...
    2. Re:if that is necessary... by The+Shrewd+Dude · · Score: 1

      Huh? But I live in Azeroth!

    3. Re:if that is necessary... by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This geographic limitation is very weird and runs opposite to the worldwide nature of open source software.

      Why aren't Africans or Asians or Australians (or whateverians) allowed to enter ? What's wrong with the other north Americans (Mexicans) ?

      Is this a language issue ? Part of the "fight against terror" (sic) or what ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:if that is necessary... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More likely legal requirements, or restrictions on shipping technology (the first prize) to other countries.

      Remember the furore about banning the sale of PS2s to Iraq because the chips could be used in missile guidance systems?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    5. Re:if that is necessary... by Un+quebecois · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hope some day I'll be able to check my quebecois passport. Until then I only have a passport of a foreign country. Whoohoo. Quebec is on the map. Even on slashdot. Thank's. Thank you all.

    6. Re:if that is necessary... by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      On second thought, if that is necessary for you to remember where you live, then maybe you shouldn't be entering the contest.

      I guess this is true if you live in North America. And our governments wonder why software development is going offshore. Politicians aught to ask how silly their laws are.

    7. Re:if that is necessary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know that Quebec is not in Canada. Goddamn separatists.

      Maybe that should have said (not including Quebec).

    8. Re:if that is necessary... by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Quebec was GIVEN to the British in 1763 via the Treaty of Paris
      and has been part of Canada ever since so why don't you sad whining
      Quebecoi nationalists just get over it or go live in France. Though
      to do the latter you'd obviously have to learn to speak proper
      french , not the mongrel dialect of it you lot speak.

    9. Re:if that is necessary... by GoodOmens · · Score: 1
      Yea I remember when apple first released their G4. Since it was declared a "super computer" aka did 1 gigaflop a second, it couldn't be sent to a lot of countries because of security concerns.

      Granted they could have just come here and bought one then sent it back ....

    10. Re:if that is necessary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I haven't been outside in years. Maybe the Muslums have taken over, but I won't resist until they take away the Internet!

    11. Re:if that is necessary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, is that seriously why they want independence? Because they think they're more French than Canadian?

      Isn't this kind of like New York City begging for independence because they feel they're more Dutch? Or, better yet, Florida, because they feel more Spanish?

    12. Re:if that is necessary... by databyss · · Score: 2, Funny

      First off, every Whateverian that I've met has been a complete prick, and undeserving of entry into such a contest.

      Second, it's probably due to the legality of shipping the prizes.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    13. Re:if that is necessary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I live in Québec:
      Québec has very more strict laws regarding all kinds of contests and loteries. Therefore, for almost all online contests, Québécois are not allowed to participate where Canadians sometimes do. That is I think what the author meant when he mentioned (or in Québec).

      Plus, I also believe he wanted to highlight the fact that Québec independance has now gain (and maintained for more than the last 6 months) a momentum: > 50% of population intention.

      Wikipedia has very detailed articles on this subject : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_sovereignty

      Squidy
      http://www.squidy.info/

    14. Re:if that is necessary... by m50d · · Score: 1
      On second thought, if that is necessary for you to remember where you live, then maybe you shouldn't be entering the contest.

      On the contrary, if you would think of your netblock when asked where you live you're the perfect person to enter.

      --
      I am trolling
    15. Re:if that is necessary... by bogado · · Score: 1

      Why not give the prize with "free shipiment" to the places where it is easy and offer an opition for a payed shipment for winners outside the US, canada and etc.?

      --
      []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

      ^[:wq

    16. Re:if that is necessary... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Apple ran an ad pushing this (didn't it involve a tank or something)?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    17. Re:if that is necessary... by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      No, it's because we have a distinct culture. The fact that we speak french and the rest of Canada speaks english made exchange difficult and culture evolved differently. Combine it with the kind of bad national pride that you have in the US and this explain why people wants to separate. Oh and the fear that we are going to be assimilated the english culture if we don't.

      In a nutshell, that's why. And remember that most of Quebec don't want to separate.

      Beside, we speak better french than the french and have not replaced a lot of the original french word with english ones like the french.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    18. Re:if that is necessary... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Yes I remember. Like most of the PS2 launch specs / promises / bullshit, that was a flat out lie perpertrated by Sony.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    19. Re:if that is necessary... by cg0def · · Score: 1

      yeah first of all the PS2 was banned from being sold in Iraq because of an embargo and not some stupid idea that they could be used for missle guidance systems. What you might have read in a dumb yellow press publication is nother story.

    20. Re:if that is necessary... by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe you'll find it was part of the trade embargo. Part of the details of the embargo were that countries and companies were banned from exporting "high technology" to Iraq, partly because they could (theoretically) be used to construct weapons or (military) infrastructure.

      Like, y'know, the UK "Iraqi Supergun" scandal in the 90's, when companies in the UK were prohibited from exporting metal pipes because it was suspected they were to be used in constructing a supergun-style cannon.

      What was your point again?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  2. what about existing extensions? by brenddie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    are they elegible?

    --
    The best test environment is production. - Me
    chrome://browser/content/browser.xul
    1. Re:what about existing extensions? by drstock · · Score: 1

      are they elegible?
      RTFA maybe?

      --
      My other comment is funny
    2. Re:what about existing extensions? by anickname · · Score: 1

      Well the page says upgraded and new. Just discovered this baby, which I find very innovative http://amb.vis.ne.jp/mozilla/scrapbook/index.php?l ang=en It allows you to collect parts of or whole webpages while categorizing and editing them and keeping the original link. Very cool. It's a shame he's from japan. Be gentle on his site though I haven't given him the heads up.

    3. Re:what about existing extensions? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      I certainly hope so, because installing 1.5 disabled 90% of my plugins from 1.07. My total 1.5 install time was less than 30 seconds before I uninstalled and went back to 1.07.

      A 1.5 release is nowhere near as important as having my plugins work, so I'm not contemplating upgrading permanently any time soon... Anything that encourages developers to update existing plugins is worthwhile IMHO.

      N>

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    4. Re:what about existing extensions? by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Because it's so hard to get the 1.07 extensions working in 1.5?

      Takes about 5 seconds per extension, all you need is an archive proggie, and a text-editor.

      Extract the RDF file, bring the maximum version number up to 1.7 and pop it back into the .xpi file.

      Worked on every single one of my broken extensions. YMMV.

    5. Re:what about existing extensions? by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      there is also an extension called "Nightly Tester Tools" that allows you to do this without having to edit the xpi. the only extension that doesnt work for me is Mnenhy for thunderbird

    6. Re:what about existing extensions? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1
      It's a shame he's from japan

      Don't you mean it is a shame, the contest doesn't allow entries from japan.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    7. Re:what about existing extensions? by anickname · · Score: 1

      No, I think only Frisians should be allowed to write extensions.

    8. Re:what about existing extensions? by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 1

      That's not the point - I know perfectly well how to fix it if I want to, but if authors aren't going to update their plugins until after 1.5 is released, why should I bother even testing a beta version?

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    9. Re:what about existing extensions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You shouldn't, but then don't bitch about it either. It's beta. The authors don't get paid for them, so why bother with a beta when they can be doing things like making sure it's gonna work for the next full version, adding features, or, god forbid, earning a living.

      Anything that encourages developers to update existing plugins is worthwhile IMHO.

      I bet a donation would help. Probably more so than bitching about it, at least.

  3. MozCorp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought it was the Mozilla Foundation (AKA MoFo)

    1. Re:MozCorp? by serialdogma · · Score: 1

      It looks like they spilt off their advertising and such into its own company about 4 months ago.
      http://www.mozilla.org/reorganization/

  4. Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stupid of them to leave out Japan and other parts of Asia ... there's lots of good geeks who could build good extensions there.

    1. Re:Japan by zecg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The very (IMHO) finest of Firefox extensions (when regarding complexity, usefulness, ergonomics and overall polish), ever - Scrapbook is from Japan.

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    2. Re:Japan by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      IMNSHO, excluding anyone purely on geographical location is stupid. If the person has the tools and skills required, they should be elligible to enter, full stop. I don't care if they live in Canada or Outer Mongolia, if they are able to enter they should be permitted to enter.

      I realise that in some cases it may be impractical or impossible to give them their prize, but so what? Donate it to a worthy cause, or give it to the next best entry. If the contest was restricted on the basis of skin colour, or sex, or similar, people would be up in arms in protest.

      That said, I can't actually see where it says that anyone is excluded on the basis of geographical location...

    3. Re:Japan by AnonymousBystander · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the FAQ:
      Is the contest open to International entries?

      Yes. Please see the contest rules for more information.

      and I don't see the US + EU + CA only rules in the official rules

    4. Re:Japan by tbigby · · Score: 1

      That said, I can't actually see where it says that anyone is excluded on the basis of geographical location...

      This is correct! The main page says:

      Who can participate? Individuals and groups over 18 years of age are eligible to participate in this contest except where this contest is prohibited by law. Please see the Official Rules for complete details. So far we have validated that the contest and its rules are legal in the United States, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union.

      In other words, you may participate as long as this contest is legal under your country's laws. We know that the rules are legal in the US, Canada (but we do not know the legality of Quebec), and the EU. If you live in a country other than these, you must confirm whether the rules are legal where you live, and if so you may enter the contest!

      The rules exactly say (under section 14, Litigation):

      These official rules will be void where any provision thereof would be found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction. If you are a resident of such a jurisdiction, you may not participate in the Contest.

      Again, residents from other countries than those listed may be eligible to enter, depending on the legality of the rules in your country. I'm no lawyer, but I haven't seen anything in the rules that should make the contest illegal in any moderate country.

      The article summary therefore is completely wrong as those outside the US, the EU, or Canada, or those in Quebec, are most certainly not ineligible to enter.

  5. Experienced vs Novices by clear_thought_05 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how the little guys (ex: SVG Switcher for FF1.5) will compete with the big guys (ex: Web Dev Toolbar).

    I just hope that the small guys are judged fairly and those with years of experience don't just take over the whole competition. Or maybe that's okay, because in the end (perhaps) it will be the big serious guys against eachother and all the newcomers pretty much don't have a chance.

    Just my opinion, I wonder what others might think.

    1. Re:Experienced vs Novices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just hope that the small guys are judged fairly and those with years of experience don't just take over the whole competition. Or maybe that's okay, because in the end (perhaps) it will be the big serious guys against eachother and all the newcomers pretty much don't have a chance.

      I don't download my firefow plugins based on how Indie they are. Do you? I download the ones that do what I need and do them well.

      There's still scope for the little guy doing something original and innovative.

    2. Re:Experienced vs Novices by JimBowen · · Score: 1

      I think they should have a class for new guys, so at least they can compete for best in class.
      The big guys should have their prize too, hnowever. They churn out a lot more so than the small-time guys do, so it makes sense to have more prizes for them.

    3. Re:Experienced vs Novices by clear_thought_05 · · Score: 1

      I don't download my firefow plugins based on how Indie they are. Do you? I download the ones that do what I need and do them well.

      There's still scope for the little guy doing something original and innovative.


      I agree but I think the experienced guys have a rather significant head start. And I think in the larger scope the big popular ones are popular because they do what majority of people need and the fact that they work well.

    4. Re:Experienced vs Novices by booch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My opinion is that you're smoking crack. The Web Developer extension is written by a single person. What makes you think that it's unfair that he has had some experience? It doesn't appear that he's getting paid for his work (except the PayPal donation button on his site). He's an amateur too. Maybe we should restrict the Olympics to first-time athletes, to make it "fair".

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    5. Re:Experienced vs Novices by clear_thought_05 · · Score: 1

      It's very easy for popularity to influence fairness. It's a fact of life, get over it.

      In the end, unless there are classes for prizes, the more experienced will most likely trump the novices. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with that but what it may do is discourage novices from applying.

      Maybe we should restrict the Olympics to first-time athletes, to make it "fair". ... Great example! Look up the history on the (current, not ancient) Olympics, you'll find that it was originally only for amateurs.

    6. Re:Experienced vs Novices by booch · · Score: 1

      Yes, I am aware of that. But amateur does not in any way equate to first-time.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    7. Re:Experienced vs Novices by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Of course the experienced guys/teams have an advantage - they're used to Mozilla changing the plugin API with every point release for the past 8 years.

      If Mozilla wants a good collection of extensions, how's about freezing the API? Pick one and stick with it. Then devs can spend their time on quality and features, not fighting a never-ending battle against breakage.

      I'm a pretty hard-core web-geek, but I'm still using Mozilla proper because I can't get a decent version of Firefox for Mac (which is basically 1.5) with compatible versions of the extensions required to replace Mozilla functionality (just in the browser).

      Major releases are where API's are allowed/expected to break, not minor releases.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Experienced vs Novices by miyako · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure that's true. Perhaps this will encourage open source developers who have not looked at XUL to give it a shot- thereby adding experienced developers to the Firefox Community. Plus there are others who might not have a hope of winning but how might try to submit something all the same.
      I have only played around with coding for Firefox personally, but I'm considering entering the contest because I don't have anything to lose, and even if I don't win the community gets some benefits.
      And in the spirit of openness- my idea is a plug-in to make the back and forward buttons act a little more sensibly to new users. I'm constantly aggrevated by clicking back, then clicking on a link, and then I click back twice trying to find the page that has now been lost to my history- so my idea is to make it so that if you go from page a to b, then b to c, then click back to get to b, go from b to d, click back you get to b, click back again and you get to c instead of a.
      It's simple enough that it's not likely to win- there are probably already things that do this. Someone else might write a better version of it than me, but still the idea and code could benefit the community, and I can learn a bit more about writing code for firefox.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  6. Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestants?? by Livino · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I though Mozilla and the whole free and open source movement was about, well, openness in the first place... Now they're shutting out 85% of the world! (and possibly a similar proportion of the world's developers if Brazil, India, China, South Africa etc. are taken into account. I'm assuming Russia is being included in Europe)

    --
    Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
  7. Re:Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot! Quebec is ALLOWED! But, they ARE singled out, even though they are IN Canada. That is tres stupid!

    Now, Quebec IS kinda like Canada's wife... Always threatening leaving for more money and a better suitor...

  8. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Informative

    They were talking about the EU, not Europe, so Russia is out as well.

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  9. extentions are great..... by Celt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without the 30-40 extentions that I make use of on a daily basis I would have properly have moved to Opera by now, but the extentions make firefox great so I continue to use it :)

    As well as the excellent extentions like adblock, tabbed browser prefs and sessionsaver its also the little extentions like GMail Delete Button, Wellrounded and MediaPlayerConnectivity that make Firefox a great browser.

    Good idea that their running a competition as I'm sure it'll ensure their are even more great extentions in the future, I just hope developers update then as time goes on.

    --
    "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    1. Re:extentions are great..... by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree with you that extensions are what makes Firefox as good a browser as it is. However, I have become very wary of trying to run with too many. In my experience, there is a tendency for extensions to conflict with each other. As a result, I now only include those that I consider genuinely important. Those with marginal utility, even though they may be nice, no longer have a place in my system. For me, about a dozen extensions give me most of what I want: the days of 30-40 extensions are over.

    2. Re:extentions are great..... by Moderator · · Score: 0

      Fuck that shit, if the only thing that resulted from this contest was that Multizilla was ported to Firefox, not only would I be a happy man, but I'd finally be able to move over to Firefox from the Suite. No extension currently out there handles the features that Multizilla does; Tab Browser Extensions doesn't even come close.

      --
      The World is Yours.
    3. Re:extentions are great..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Good idea that their running a competition as I'm sure it'll ensure their are even more great extentions in the future, I just hope developers update then as time goes on."

      I just thought of one: Slashdot post grammar checker! (Hint: "their" twice, "update then", and a run-on sentence.)

  10. Re:Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's okay... Quebec's language police probably would confiscate the computer in anyhow, since it's unlikely that "ArticlesÉtrangers" appears in a significantly larger font than "AlienWare"....

  11. Want to win? by mr_tommy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not buld a bit torrent client into Firefox? See this bug on Bugzilla for a start point; I'm pretty sure you'd have a good chance if you put this together!

    1. Re:Want to win? by highspl · · Score: 1

      Ha! The link doesn't work, as links to bugs from slashdot are blocked. How 'bout a non-blocking slashdot to bugzilla plugin. WINNER!!!

      --
      It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
    2. Re:Want to win? by nicklott · · Score: 1

      And while you're at it, why not stick a toaster in your tv? I've always wondered why Sony don't do the TVToaster...

    3. Re:Want to win? by ghee22 · · Score: 1
      This is already a google sumer of code project in alpha, and another community based extension (and soon to be standalone), also in alpha.

      They allow you to upgrade extensions and still win. Here are the keys gentlemen/gentlewomen, start your engines!

      --
      "Persistence is annoying success." - ghee22 11:28:1999 - 10:53:PM
    4. Re:Want to win? by adamjudson · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could use http://tamperdata.mozdev.org/ to change the
      referer on the fly...

      A

    5. Re:Want to win? by idonthack · · Score: 1

      As soon as I get home I'll write a GM script.

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    6. Re:Want to win? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea. The excess heat from the tv tube could be used to heat up the bread, so the heating elements don't have to work quite as hard.

    7. Re:Want to win? by bmalia · · Score: 1

      What is the advantage to having a bit torrent client built into firefox as opposed to just installing the client thats already available?

      --
      There's no place like ~/
  12. Dumb Move. by donnacha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Better check your passports first though, as those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter.
    And they wonder why take-up has been lower outside the US?

    Dumb, dumb, dumb. Especially when it comes to extensions - my rough recollection is that most of the best extensions seem to be by Europeans.

    They're probably going to claim that they had no choice because it's tricky/expensive to ship electronics outside the States but, c'mon, how hard would it have been to arrange an alternative prize, at least to avoid rubbing the world's nose in it at a time when America isn't exactly the most popular kid in the class. If Mozcorp has a PR, he/she should probably reconsider his/her position.

    1. Re:Dumb Move. by tgd · · Score: 1

      Or maybe their legal department didn't have the money or resources to verify the contest met local laws in hundreds of countries?

      I know assuming you're smarter than people who made decisions you don't understand is the slashdot way, but insulting people who probably actually know more about their job than you is pretty childish.

    2. Re:Dumb Move. by Westley · · Score: 1

      Um, EU=European Union, which seems to quash most of your objection.

      And as for why take-up has been lower outside the US - do you really think it has anything to do with the competitions for extension developers?

    3. Re:Dumb Move. by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

      It's still early here, so maybe I'm just misunderstanding your point... but the text you quoted says that people in the United States, Europe, and Canada are able to enter the competition. So what's your complaint again?

    4. Re:Dumb Move. by macpulse · · Score: 1
      my rough recollection is that most of the best extensions seem to be by Europeans.

      EU = European Union. That means the contest is open to those in Europe... the place you believe to be the source of the best extensions.

      --
      I feel more like I do right now than I did a while ago.
    5. Re:Dumb Move. by LnxAddct · · Score: 1

      There are legal requirements that must be followed and most countries have really shitty laws in that regard. America isn't the most popular kid in the class because everyone else is wishing they were them, its called jealousy, get over yourself. Whenever another country needs a favor, they always come to America first. You're probably in the same group of people that wants the U.N. to control domain servers and set precedent for an international tax, not to mention extreme censorcism of the net according to the agendas of not only the highly corrupt U.N. but also by many of the individual nation. Most countries are far worse off than the U.S., and they just kind of ignore their own problems while laughing at the U.S. The funny thing is that they just keep getting worse while the U.S. makes real progress in areas that matter.
      Regards,
      Steve

    6. Re:Dumb Move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, like encouraging international terrorism.

  13. Why Québec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. We are part of the Canada. We are important. They don't want us to leave but we can't even participate to Mozilla contests. WTF?

    1. Re:Why Québec? by Serapth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. We are part of the Canada. We are important. They don't want us to leave but we can't even participate to Mozilla contests. WTF?

      Who says we dont want you to leave?

    2. Re:Why Québec? by databyss · · Score: 1

      Get more feasible contest laws.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    3. Re:Why Québec? by lucm · · Score: 0, Troll

      then next time we try to get rid of this relationship with your ridiculous country, don't come in Montreal a few days before the referendum for a "love-in".

      and try to convince your corrupt government not to speed up the processing of immigration in the months before the referendum just to get a few thousand more votes for this Good Ol' Canada like they did in 95.

      and while you are at it, pay yourself for the visits of your queen of england which we don't give a damn about, and give us back our share of the money wasted on your 2 Billions $ firearm program which is a big joke.

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    4. Re:Why Québec? by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Well, Jean Cretien, for one.

      He so badly wants Quebec to not leave that he funnelled $300,000,000 of his party's money to government coffers in order to help keep Quebec in Canada.

      That, or the other way around. Damn Gomery report is so confusing...

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    5. Re:Why Québec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. We are part of the Canada. We are important. They don't want us to leave but we can't even participate to Mozilla contests. WTF?

      Who says we dont want you to leave?


      Me. And pretty much everyone I know, from the East coast to the West coast.

      Have you actually ever been to Quebec, or are you just bitching from the sidelines?

      Anyone who doesn't appreciate and value that province doesn't appreciate and value Canada as an institution.

      Down with Separatism!

  14. Once again: OSS is not US specific! by MikeTheBike · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Can someone tell these boneheads that we outside of the US aren't to pleased to allways see that the event horizon of the US citizen ends at the border of the US of A. Ever heard of things like KDE and Linux??? Not invented in the US!!! Suprise, suprise! Go back to the drawingboard and come up with a contest worthy of the Mozilla project!

    1. Re:Once again: OSS is not US specific! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OSS may not be, but there are export restriction on PCs to some parts of the world.
      So the restriction is the prize.

    2. Re:Once again: OSS is not US specific! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, as soon as you say something coherent.

    3. Re:Once again: OSS is not US specific! by databyss · · Score: 1

      Luckily for your the contest isn't limited to the US.

      Unless you consider the majority of Canada and the EU to be insignificant entities.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  15. Re:Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realized that you are violating copyright and trademarks by using the word "Ol****cs" without proper authorization?

  16. The MozCorp .... by plsavaria · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    thinks that Québec isn't in Canada! I knew it! In your face Canada.

    --
    The answer IS 42.
    1. Re:The MozCorp .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more because you have to register your contest with the "Régie des alcool, des courses et jeux" (loose traduction : Office of alcool, gambling and lottery).

      http://www.racj.gouv.qc.ca/Index.asp?lang=en&

    2. Re:The MozCorp .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey watch it dude or we'll have to stage another love in !

    3. Re:The MozCorp .... by cybergrue · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is because the rules for contests winnings in Qubec are comnpletely different then anywhere else in North America. If I recall correctly, the major difference is that a percentage of the potential winnings has to be given to the Qubec government as a tax for the contest to be run there, even if it is not won by a Qubecor. That an a whole lot more paper work means that residents of Qubec are excluded from most contests run in North America.

    4. Re:The MozCorp .... by frankcow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, every person in Québec believes they're not in Canada either!!!!

    5. Re:The MozCorp .... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Thats just lame.
      Why cant we have a world where stupid laws like that dont exist and cool contests like this can be open to all the world instead of a chosen few.

      Although I suppose if there were no laws whatsoever, there would be nothing to stop unscruplous companies from running contests and not giving any prizes.
      Or to stop companies moving to places like the bahamas or other tax havens to avoid paying the gambling/lottery taxes on their big prize payouts.

    6. Re:The MozCorp .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law 101 is the reason the contest is not open to Quebecers. If there is no copy of the rules available in french, Quebec governement judge we are inapt to participate. It's the same kind of dumb thing as the math equation you sometimes have to answer to win.
       
      Hello!!! As far as I know I still live in a country where french AND english are the official languages, no matter in which part of the country you live.

  17. Re:Québec by Tashmire · · Score: 0

    Well i'm sorry if I pissed off people from Québec, all i' be sayin is all the nice Extensions are on sisters in Philly. Shaniqua, Jeromes little sis, has a nice set she got from the lady's shack.

  18. End of shelf-life for Flock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    After RTFA, I immediately thought that this is some attempt to knock Flock out of the browser landcape before it even gets any traction. I like Flock but I never understood how some could secure the funding for making a customized Firefox.

    1. Re:End of shelf-life for Flock? by Maian · · Score: 1

      I really really doubt they're trying to "knock Flock out". In fact, many of these extensions will probably work right out of the box in Flock. Not all extensions are going to be about tagging or blogging or whatever else Flock specializes in.

  19. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    I'd say the PATRIOT Act is a likely culprit here. By restricting candidacy to "allied" nations, Mozillia become less of a target for investigation and scrutiny than if it allowed candidates from more suspect countries like, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, China, France.....

    Oh Wait.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  20. not in quebec by azatht · · Score: 1

    it states:
    Where? Contest is open to residents of the US, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union. Void where prohibited.

    --
    ------- In the end there are no begining
    1. Re:not in quebec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... you should never void where it is prohibited

  21. Windows XP? by rufus_sd · · Score: 0

    It is interesting to see that the Firefox development prize has a big headline about how the Alienware machine run best on windows xp...

    1. Re:Windows XP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, sorry to have to point out the obvious, but operating systems run on computers, not the other way around as you have stated. Shouldn't you be ordering more paperclips or reloading the printer or something similar?

    2. Re:Windows XP? by aristofanes · · Score: 0, Offtopic
  22. A webdav client extension by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would really love to see a webdav client extension for Firefox. It would give a consistent experience with webdav server accross platforms, and could even end up being more usefull than what microsoft did (which from their side was clever, because it prevented a direct concurrent to their proprietary SMB server to thrive thus denying a world of possibilities outside of their realm).

  23. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Paul+Rose · · Score: 1

    It is a competition with non-trivial prizes.

    There are significant legal restrictions, tax restrictions, etc. It would take a fair amount of work for them to make it legal in more places.

  24. Re:extensions are great... but... by evilad · · Score: 1

    Really the extensions are what make the application. Firefox itself isn't really much more than a platform. I really wish someone would create an application bundle with a collection of most of the frequently-used plugins.

    It is one of my pet peeves that I must remember to download a dozen extensions on every new install.

  25. Why only U.S/Canada/E.U by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I didn't find it anywhere in the official rules rules, FAQ, or other place in their webpage From FAQ:
    Is the contest open to International entries?
    Yes. Please see the contest rules for more information.
    Now here from the official rules:
    4. ELIGIBILITY

    The Contest is open only to individuals who are at least 18 years of age. Employees of Mozilla Corporation and their respective parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, suppliers, advertising agencies, and families, and persons living in the same household as such employees, are not eligible to participate. The Contest is subject to all national, federal, state and local laws and regulations. These official rules are void where they are prohibited or restricted by law or regulation.
    Does not say a word about nationallity of entrant. Or am I missing something?
    1. Re:Why only U.S/Canada/E.U by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought at first too, then I looked closer:
      http://developer.mozilla.org/contests/extendfirefo x/

      Where? Contest is open to residents of the US, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union. Void where prohibited.
      So the issue seems confused the official rules don't say anything about location, but the announcement does.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  26. javascript verification, please by Isomorph · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone make a Javasript verificater.

    I have been programing some javascript programs, but they
    don't work when I move to Opera or MSIE.

    A plugin that could check if the code is standart complient
    whould be great.

    Or if the plugin know what code can't run on MSIE.

    1. Re:javascript verification, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      standart? stand art?

      Ooooooooh, standard!

    2. Re:javascript verification, please by Maian · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "they don't work when I move to Opera or MSIE"? Did some syntax error happen? Or was it some DOM incompatibility issue? In any case, this would be pretty useless to make as an extension - if anything, this should be an extension to to the IDE you're using, not the browser!

    3. Re:javascript verification, please by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Have you tried the web developer toolbar

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    4. Re:javascript verification, please by Lucas.Langa · · Score: 1

      You mean a spell checker? True, you sure could use one.

      --
      Build a tool even an idiot can use and only an idiot will want to use it. -S.O.B.
  27. Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Agelmar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've read TFA, and I can't see anywhere where the rules prohibit entries from Japan etc. The only thing in the rules I can see that mentions geography is "These official rules will be void where any provision thereof would be found invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction. If you are a resident of such a jurisdiction, you may not participate in the Contest." and later, "...he/she is a resident of a jurisdiction where these official rules may be enforced in their entirety and without modification."

    Nowhere does it specifically limit the contest to USA,CAN,EU that I can find - I'm wondering where the OP got this? Can anyone shed further light on the subject?

    1. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Otter · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's in the contest rules...

    2. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by grenthal · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it's on the frontpage, but not in official rules to which I have to agree to participate. So that kind of legaly makes everyone eligable. Or am I missing something?

    4. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Agelmar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Interesting - it's in the "Contest Rules", but not in the "Official Contest Rules". That's most odd in my book.

    5. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by bahwi · · Score: 1

      The second link.
      Here. Under where is says "Where?" way above the fold.

      "Where? Contest is open to residents of the US, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union. Void where prohibited."

    6. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Raphael · · Score: 1

      Even the official rules start with "VOID WHERE PROHIBITED".

      I assume that the Mozilla guys are not sure about the legal status of such a contest in countries other than US, Canada and members of the EU. They probably limit the contest to those countries to cover their own backs.

      --
      -Raphaël
    7. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by edxwelch · · Score: 1

      They seem to be mixed up on this one.
      It says here: http://developer.mozilla.org/contests/extendfirefo x/
      "Where? Contest is open to residents of the US, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union. Void where prohibited."
      Then in the FAQ (http://developer.mozilla.org/mozilla-org/contests /extendfirefox/faq.php#8)
      it says "Is the contest open to International entries?

      Yes. Please see the contest rules for more information."

      But then in the official rules there is no mention of it.

    8. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Monimonika · · Score: 1

      Don't know if someone's mentioned this yet, but the wording has been changed to

      "So far we have validated that the contest and its rules are legal in the United States, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union."

      I'm guessing that there's going to be more edits and countries added as time progresses.

    9. Re:Where does TFA mention geographic restrictions? by Finuvir · · Score: 1
      It's in the contest rules...
      No it's not. The contest main page says that they have verified that it's legal to enter in the US, Canada (sans Quebec) and the EU. It doesn't say that other areas are excluded. The official rules don't mention any specific jurisdiction.
      --
      Why is anything anything?
  28. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering that Quebec is NOT in the permitted list, it probably has to do with the legality of awarding a prize. Quebec has wierd laws about that and almost every contest I see in BC has some rider about "not valid in Quebec".

    So, they probably verified it was OK in the US, the EU, and non-Quebec Canada, but either couldn't or didn't verify it was legal elsewhere and thus don't allow entrants from nonvalidated places.

    (Sorry if that makes no sense, I'm just ending a nightshift here)

  29. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by cow+ninja · · Score: 1

    I am sure there is a reason that they didn't include them. Geeze.. It's not like they said 'I hate those guys!! Exclude those bastards!'

  30. dont leave us out! by shrewd · · Score: 3, Funny

    theres alot of talent in antarctica, why should they be excluded?

    1. Re:dont leave us out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure an extremely high percentage of Antarcticans are nerds indeed.

    2. Re:dont leave us out! by Eccles · · Score: 1

      I'm sure an extremely high percentage of Antarcticans are nerds indeed.

      Really? I would have thought an extremely high percentage are penguins.

      They're not nerds -- for one thing, they spend their lives outside...

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    3. Re:dont leave us out! by ballsanya · · Score: 1

      yeah, doesn't that linux penguin live there or somthing? I'm always racing him down a hill there. ;)

  31. Shame... by Elixon · · Score: 1

    "Better check your passports first though, as those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter."

    I thing that european developers are as good as american, don't you think? I didn't know that Internet (Mozilla) playes on state borders... :-(

    --
    Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
    1. Re:Shame... by databyss · · Score: 1

      European as in "EU" European, which is included in the permitted list?

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    2. Re:Shame... by Elixon · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I didn't finish my thought (I was in hurry and I didn't noticed that my hands were not as fast as thoughts ;)

      I wanted to say that EU programmers are as good as American ....and Asian programmers are as good as EU programmers... and all of them share love to Firefox and live on the Internet planet... so how the state borders apply to this community?

      --
      Well, I've got to get back to work. When I stop rowing, the slave ship just goes in circles.
    3. Re:Shame... by databyss · · Score: 1

      Agreed, that makes alot of sense!

      Unfortunately, the legal side of exporting high-end computer hardware is much more complicated.

      This issue has nothing to do with what the Mozilla Foundation things of programmers from different geographical locations.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  32. That's news to me by chrisnewbie · · Score: 0

    "US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter."

    Since when did québec separate from Canada?

  33. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Livino · · Score: 1

    Well it was the EU not Europe after all. Sorry. So Russia's out too. As for the legal complications, they could've come up with a cash prize or something else... This is very bad PR for the Mozilla Foundation and Firefox. They're not in a position where they can simply shun most of the world, especially considering that the places they excluded are the most likely to use Mozilla products! Very sad for them. As a Brazilian, I think I'll switch to Opera or start using Konqueror for the time being.

    --
    Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
  34. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by RandoX · · Score: 1

    I may be wrong, but aren't there export restrictions on high-end computing systems, which Alienware may arguably fall into that category?

  35. I can see it now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open-source world's biggest memory-leech, meet ... the second-biggest memory leech! (Which of you guys is which again?)

    Together at last! And we all lived happily ever after with 2GB of DDR3 and no desire to run any other apps at the same time.

  36. Rules & eligibility by dago · · Score: 1

    Strange, the published rules don't make any mention of the location of the participatns (or I read them too fast).

    --
    #include "coucou.h"
    1. Re:Rules & eligibility by databyss · · Score: 1
      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
    2. Re:Rules & eligibility by AndreiK · · Score: 1

      "Individuals and groups over 18 years of age are eligible to participate in this contest except where this contest is prohibited by law. Please see the Official Rules for complete details. So far we have validated that the contest and its rules are legal in the United States, Canada (excluding Quebec), and the European Union."

      That just means they know that its definitely legal in those places. They haven't checked the laws in other places.

  37. Then why is Quebec excluded? by dmoen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Remember the furore about banning the sale of PS2s to Iraq...

    So MozCorp is worried that those crafty Quebecois will use the first prize to build weapons of mass destruction?

    --
    I have written a truly remarkable program which this sig is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      what about us down under? its not going to cost THAT much to ship the stinking prize down here is it... you can ship to EU but cant be stuffed Shipping to AUS... im almost tempted to go try opera isntead of the 1.5 RC like i was intending to do tonight...

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    2. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "im almost tempted to go try opera isntead of the 1.5 RC like i was intending to do tonight"
      I'm sure they're really bothered.

    3. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by Whafro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Meeting legal requirements for contests limited just to the United States is often a very difficult chore. I see how much work the attorneys in the advertising/competition group in my firm go to for each such proposed contest, and am glad I'm not in that group.

      It gets exponentially more difficult when you go into other countries, with completely different rules and regulations.

      So in contrast, I am impressed that they went to the trouble of making it as international as they feasibly could without bankrupting themselves on legal fees and delaying the contest for another year while it was approved.

    4. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So in contrast, I am impressed that they went to the trouble of making it as international as they feasibly could without bankrupting themselves on legal fees and delaying the contest for another year while it was approved.

      Bankruptcy? Not likely http://markpincus.typepad.com/markpincus/2005/05/f irefox_foxy_ca.html

    5. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1
      Remember the furore about banning the sale of PS2s to Iraq

      That's the first time I've heard of it. It makes it sound as if Iraq had everything ready for the WMDs except the PS2 chips. I can imagine the following dialog:

      [Sadam]: General, are the WMD ready?
      [General]: Yes, the nuclear, biological and chemical warheads are ready, fueled up and pointed at the infidels.
      [Sadam]: What are we waiting on then, let's launch them!
      [General]: We can't.
      [Sadam]: Why not?
      [General]: We don't have any PS2 chips.
      [Sadam]: Damn you Amiricans and UN, damn you to hell!

    6. Re:Then why is Quebec excluded? by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      You totally misinterpreted the OP. By WMDs, he obviously meant "weapons of minor destruction". ;)

      But seriously, the post you quoted said nothing about WMDs. Just "missile guidance systems", which are obviously useful outside biological and/or nuclear warfare.

  38. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Livino · · Score: 1

    As for legal reasons, well... Isn't that lame they couldn't bother to check those before deciding on an international contest? I'm pretty sure there are customs duties to be paid in the EU and Canada if the PC is shipping from the U.S. So that's not a good reason. These guys need a new PR team fast! Hehehehe

    --
    Timeo Danaos et dona ferentes.
  39. Who cares ? fix the plugin manager by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares what new crap's being added to Firefox.

    When is its plugin mangler going to stop trying to force me to install fucking flash etc. ?

    Slow Down Cowboy!

    Slashdot requires you to wait between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 2 minutes since A COWORKER WHO USES THE SAME PROXY last successfully posted a comment

  40. Better pop-up extentions? by NXprime · · Score: 4, Informative

    Better pop-up extentions? 1. A popup blocker that works %100 of the time. Even with Firefox 1.5 Beta2 build, I still get a popup by clicking this link http://www.activewin.com/awin/default.asp and then clicking anywhere on the page at all. Appearently they have a javascript that knows when you're 'touching' a webpage? I have to highlight text to read better so I don't know why this is going on. I do have my settings set at opening pages or user clicked popups in the same window as the current tab. Don't know if that's causing it or not. Is there a nicer Windows news website than Activewin? I'm really starting to hate that pop-up infested site. 2. Flash pop-up detector. Go here. http://www.cleveland.com/ a flash ad flys across the page. I like using Flashblock that blocks all flash (yeah, right) until I allow it to. Happens sometimes on yahoo.com news pages too. I guess I'm asking for a noscript type extension, but is dormant until I ask it to block scripts for a webpage since it's only these websites driving me nuts right now. A blacklist if you will. I spent more time messing with NoScript extension then going to my daily 45 websites. Plus I like installing a new clean install of firefox and updated extensions meaning I don't have time redoing this crap all the time. Disabling SOME scripts for websites would be cool too. Spellcheck as you type for Firefox would be a killer extension too. :)

    1. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by ghee22 · · Score: 1

      I went to both sites.. i didn't see any ads. Turns out that the extensions I have work just fine. They are a combo of Adblock with Adblock Filterset.G Updater.

      --
      "Persistence is annoying success." - ghee22 11:28:1999 - 10:53:PM
    2. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by dvanatta · · Score: 1

      I would recommend AdBlock Plus with Filterset G Updater.

    3. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by j3tt · · Score: 1

      I went to the ActiveWin site, I did not see any popups. I'm using 1.5 RC1 and don't have any plugins installed

    4. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 1

      Im running 1.07 with adblock and fliterset.g installed. I dont get any popups. However, the status bar at the bottom does say "waiting for www.activewin.com..." so it may be hung up on trying to load the popup.

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    5. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Same here, went tot he site, got all click-happy. No pop-ups/behinds.

      Adblock Plus and filterset.G (w/whitelist)

    6. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by john83 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I went to both sites too. No pop-ups, no flying flash ads. I'm using Firefox 1.07 with Adblock (personalised filters).

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    7. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      If it helps to know, there's a bug in bugzilla (look up #176958) that's being used to list all known exploits of the popup blocking. (It's set up to be blocked by all other bugs that list popup exploits.)

      Some of them have been un-fixed for quite a while, unfortunately. If I were an annoying website admin who wanted to beat the popup blocker, I'd probably be routinely checking this bug for new exploits. I can't complain too much given that I'm not putting the time aside to fix them myself, I guess.

    8. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

      As fellow posters have flocked to reply, using AdBlock with a decent set of filters will effectively block ads all over the place. Flashblock really does its job too. Tested in 1.5 and 1.0.7 and whatnot. Rock solid, no ads, no Flash.

      And in the border case where the webmasters employ javascript to drive you nuts, NoScript is the bomb. JavaScript is so evil it's scary, both due to privacy and advertisment. I definitely want a per-site blocker. It's trivial for a website to snoop on the browsing history of the current window or tab, for instance.

      And no, blacklisting doesn't work. It's just a catch-up game and it's stupid from a security point of view. Nevermind that all antivirus and anti-malware makers employ it. Whitelisting is the way to go, and NoScript does it right. I don't want to keep up with unknown threats, I want to only allow what I know is good.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    9. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Firefox 1.5 RC1 and I don't get that popup. I do have Flashblock, but it is disabled.

    10. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got the popup. Simple to block, though: get adblock, then block *.tribalfusion.com/*

    11. Re:Better pop-up extentions? by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points, both for the NoScript reference (I've found it incredibly useful and user-friendly as well) and for the spot-on remark about whitelisting.

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  41. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    It probably has something to do with the actual giving out of prizes. There's many lotteries in Canada that are open to everyone except quebec residents. Not because we don't like quebec, but because there's lots of other rules to follow. I'm sure you could get someone in the US to submit your entry if you think it was good enough. They could claim the prize, and then ship it to you. They maybe could just have a contest for the people who can't enter, and just give them the recognition of winning, instead of a real prize. I'm sure just putting that on your resume would be a big enough prize.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  42. Adblock by growse · · Score: 1

    I want an extension that lets me run linux within windows. Seriously, better extensions are always good, it's partly what makes firefox the great thing it is.

    --
    There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
  43. security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what they're going to do to prevent extensions that preform phishing attacks or keylogstuff. I can see it happening allready: you type in your creditcard number and that oh-so-cool extension that draws christmas lights under the menu bar sends the number to those l33t h4x0r d00dzzzz.

    I know you can always view the code of the extension (XULstuff IIRC) but is there anyone that checks the code?

    Maybe I should just use a not-so-tricked-out browser (not IE ofcourse) and put my tinfoil hat on whenever I need to do something "dangerous".

    (maybe FF should implement a way to completely turn of extensions)

  44. This will only make thing better! by TheZorch · · Score: 1

    An Extensions competition for Firefox will only make things better for us. Firefox/Mozilla just reached the 10% marketshare mark recently. Woot!

    FF is superior to IE in every way. I have nothing but problems with it everytime I use it, and the only time it does seem to work without a hitch is when I visit Windows Update. What's up with that!?

    Compared to FF my copy of IE is slow and lumbering. I have several installed Extensions and it doesn't slow me down at all. I use FastFox one of the best Extensions ever and it really does work, I use FlashGet which I just love, and it would be cool if an Extension could be made to integrate Azureus (open-source BitTorrent Client) into FF. I'd also like to see a WinAmp Compatibility Extension as well as one that adds a true FTP client to FF with the ability to pause and resume downloads and even queue up downloads so you can do them one at a time instead of all at once if you're on dialup. A very useful Extension would also be one that allows parents to restrict access to certain websites by requiring a passcode to browse to them. It would have a list of known site that aren't safe that it can download and parents can add their own. Now that would really boost FF usership ten-fold. I'd like to see IE try to beat that.

    --
    Michael "TheZorch" Haney
    thezorch@gmail.com
    http://thezorch.googlepages.com/home
    1. Re:This will only make thing better! by yddod · · Score: 0

      There already is an extension that allows you to control winamp from within FF, it is called FoxyTunes http://www.foxytunes.org/firefox/

  45. Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter."

    Québec is part of Canada, eh. Caulisse!

  46. Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Québec is IN Canada.... Why the parentheses?

  47. Re:extensions are great... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do a search for an extension called "mass installer".

    I may fit the bill for what you want to do.

  48. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by kmartshopper · · Score: 1
    I may be wrong, but aren't there export restrictions on high-end computing systems, which Alienware may arguably fall into that category?
    Seriously, God forbid the terrorists play Battlefield... and win!
  49. Or a goat client... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Visit an ASP or Cold fusion site, click on the extension, and it automatically uses SQL injection to place appropriate artwork onto the site...

  50. Re:Québec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because 49% of them want to separate, so some of us pretend they don't exist.

  51. So Norway's out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is weird. You might think it was intentional...

  52. Re:extensions are great... but... by insignificant1 · · Score: 1

    For this problem I have made use of the MRTech Local Install plugin:

    Download all the exensions you like into one folder; install the Local Install plugin; then use it to select all the extensions you have downloaded for installation. It installs all at once.

    So archive that directory with the downloaded plugins and keep it with you for future Firefox installs, and so long as the extension .xpi's are compatible with the latest version of Firefox, you just have to install them and let Firefox update them to the newest version.

    It isn't as good as what Firefox COULD do, like something where you carry a list of extensions around (a la the Info Lister plugin) whereby Firefox actually re-installs that list automatically, on-demand, and with the newest version of the plugin. Now THAT would be a useful feature of Firefox.

    Oh yeah, and I agree it is a HUGE pain in the ass to do the extension download from their site. Really crude interface considering there are so many plugins already; it can take a long time to go through the entire list, the search feature is poor, and installation requires too many clicks.

  53. A plugin idea by baxissimo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to see a plugin that lets me override annoying javascript that prevents resizing windows. It's my window damnit, I should be able to resize it if I want to. Or a plugin which lets me add the standard menu bar to a window that doesn't have it if I want the window to have a freaking menu bar.

    Ok, probably not bedazzling enough to win the competition, but it would still be a great plugin to have.

    1. Re:A plugin idea by vagabond_gr · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see a plugin that lets me override annoying javascript that prevents resizing windows.

      Goto to Edit/Preferences/Web Features, click "Advanced..." (near the "Enable javascript" checkbox) and disable the options you don't want like "move or resize existing windows".

      No extension is required.

    2. Re:A plugin idea by vagabond_gr · · Score: 1

      In my previous reply I misunderstood what you said. After submitting I realised that what you want is to not allow scripts to open non-resizable windows or windows that don't have a menu bar.

      Take a look at the dom.disable_window_open_feature.* options in about:config, in particular the following two:
          dom.disable_window_open_feature.resizable
          dom.disable_window_open_feature.menubar
      By setting them to true all windows will be resizable and will have a menu bar.

      Alse note that firefox lets you resize even non-resizable windows by dragging the window resizing grippy at the right end of the status bar. dom.disable_window_open_feature.status is true by default so the status bar will always be visible if enabled in view menu.

    3. Re:A plugin idea by baxissimo · · Score: 1

      Hey, that's not bad. Thanks. That's almost what I was asking for. Always resizeable is definitely good. Always with a menubar, though, is not exactly what I wanted.

      Really what I'd like to do is be able to turn menubars and things on and off on the fly, like via a context menu. It seems like with the above about:config options you can make them always come on, but you can't decide to add them to a window that popped up without them. About half the time I'd say I agree with the web site developer that the popup window in question doesn't need need a menubar etc. And in those cases it's nice not to have the clutter. But sometimes the designer screwed up and the contents don't actually fit, or they forgot that the contents contain a link out to some other pages of more general web content

      Eh, but the above settings give me 90% of what I was after. Thanks again, vagabond_gr.

  54. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Predathar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quebec does have special rules and regulations, but mainly the problem with contests is that there is a FEE to be paid to the province in order to have a contest. Yes that's right, if you want to include Quebec in a contest, you must first pay up, something about a fee to make sure the contest is not bogus... to protect the consumer or something like that I seem to recall.

  55. The reason by bcore · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not political or anything, Quebec just has REALLY strict contest laws that require the contest promoters to jump through a lot of hoops. Most contests here in Canada are usually advertized as being "contest void in Quebec" or whatever to that effect.

    Here's a bit more info

    1. Re:The reason by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Question: I'm from Norway. We voted no to EU twice, but we're part of the EEA (European Economic Area) and various treaties that oblige us to implement most EU directives. Could I participate? I'm living in Sweden, an EU country, right now, but the question still stands...

    2. Re:The reason by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Our stupid contest rule is that you have to perform a task to win. So contest in Quebec are the regular paper that you have to fill but with an easy mathematical question at the end so you had performed a task. Yes, answering 2 + 2 counts as a task.

      Since you must write an extension for that contest, it should be okay.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    3. Re:The reason by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      Ontario has the skill testing question too... Hmm... I always thought "skill testing question" was misleading, do you know what the literal phrase in French might be and how you would translate it literally into English?

      Sometimes the French is more descriptive... and sometimes it isn't. e.g. "Egg nog" vs. "Lait de Poulet"

    4. Re:The reason by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      Lait de poule. Poule is hen and poulet is chicken. I don't see how egg nog is more descriptive. The french version tranlates to "Hen's milk" as opposed to what is often called "Cow's milk". The english version doesn't even talk about milk.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    5. Re:The reason by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      I do think the French is more descriptive... It's also a funny example. All these mamalian hens in Quebec.

      I was wondering if the French term used for "skill testing question" might give a hint as to its real purpose.

    6. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a French canadian from Quebec, it is described as a "question d'habileté", which literally means "skill question". Grand-parent's link is worth a look.

    7. Re:The reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eggnog was originally quite descriptive in English, since it was egg mixed in ale, wine or other strong drink; and guess what nog means. The problem is that eggnog just isn't what it used to be, and we stopped using the word nog .

    8. Re:The reason by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      Our stupid contest rule is that you have to perform a task to win. So contest in Quebec are the regular paper that you have to fill but with an easy mathematical question at the end so you had performed a task. Yes, answering 2 + 2 counts as a task.


      IIRC, Quebec's restriction is based around language laws.

      In any case, the "simple task" thing is merely a loophole to prevent people from having to do lottery registrations.

  56. Or in Quebec? by Pedrito · · Score: 1

    US, EU and Canada (or in Québec)

    The poster must be Quebecois. Because if you ask anyone else, Quebec is actually PART of Canada, not a separate country.

    1. Re:Or in Quebec? by arock99 · · Score: 1

      In general any contest within Canada usually exclude Quebec. I'm unsure what the reasons are but I believe it has something to do with anything that can be won and their different rules

    2. Re:Or in Quebec? by tendays · · Score: 1

      Actually the op got it wrong. The contest is open for canada excluding Quebec.

    3. Re:Or in Quebec? by KylePflug · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Read it again. "Any user outside the US, EU, or Canada (or in Quebec) is ineligible...."

      Grammatically that's exactly correct. Paraphrased: "Users in the US, EU, and Canada, are eligable, excepting those who live within the US/EU/Canada but also live in Quebec."

      Slightly unclear wording? Perhaps. Double negative? Yeah. Incorrect? No.

    4. Re:Or in Quebec? by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      all contests are considered lotteries and require to be registered in quebec.
      Basically you need to fill out forms.

    5. Re:Or in Quebec? by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 1
      People keep saying this, hell, half of the comments seem to be it.

      Have you people ever heard of grammar? "those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter." means people a) outside of the US, EU and Canada AND b) People in Quebec may not take part.

      Try reading things before insulting their writing.

    6. Re:Or in Quebec? by __aabwba5127 · · Score: 1

      "The poster must be Quebecois." And you are probably from the ROC(Rest Of Canada). Get a life.

  57. my Quebec includes Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those outside the US, EU and Canada (or in Québec) are ineligible to enter

    Qu'est que c'est?

  58. Japan-Seafood Extensions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Stupid of them to leave out Japan and other parts of Asia ... there's lots of good geeks who could build good extensions there."

    The world doesn't need more tentacle extensions.

  59. Re:Why Québec? It's your laws... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's your laws...I think.
    I see many contests advertized that exclude Quebec.

    I don't even know if McDonald's Monopoly game is valid in Quebec. If it is, you probably can't use game pieces from quebec for the game outside of quebec and vice-versa.

    My guess is that there probably is a law in Quebec that wants to have a chunk of the prize winnings reserved for the public in Quebec. Such a law would skew the contest towards Quebec, hench the exclusion.

    IOW: It's not you. It's your laws and politicians that are screwing Quebec'ers from participating in many contests.

    BTW: If you think Quebec is "La belle province" now, wait till you separate. Those elitist politicians will finally be able to have their "Cuba of the North" and all you'll be able to say about the good'ol days is: "Je me souviens".

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  60. Maybe they should fix broken extensions first? by dyoung9090 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love Firefox and everything, but when I upgraded to one of the 1.5 betas (because everyone told me about all the new things that were going to be in it, which were admittedly small stuff like being able to reorganize my tabs) half of my extensions went bye-bye. Some came back when they were fixed, but others... not so much. A little while after the second beta came out I decided to get that too, thinking that I was over the extensions I could no longer use and that enough time had passed so that the ones I used (and surely every other person using Firefox) must have been updated as well. Not the case.

    Needless to say, I went with reckless abandon into RC1 and will probably go to the official version as soon as it's out, just to get there. My hope is that the developers of most of the extensions I used were waiting for a more stable build and so in the future I should just wait until those come out instead of jumping into the newest upgrade for a few random features.

    Now, there's going to be a dozen people telling me "Quit complaining, start programming" but I hope this comes off more as "constructive criticism" than anything else because of the web-browser user base (all 87% percent of the US or whatever number it is), a good 75 have never, can never and will never program (unless it becomes simplified to the point of telling your computer in plain language what you want it to do and it cobbles together something... "I want something to remember my recipes and generates a shopping list and gets approximate prices from the internet" and 30 seconds later a fully functional database comes out.)

    Although the percentage of coders to non-coders may be higher with Firefox, the high priests of Firefox are desperate for a piece of that mainstream market. If I show Firefox and all that I can make it do to a friend who wants it installed, I don't want to tell that friend "now, never, EVER install an update because you'll lose half of the functions you've become accustomed too, at least for a little while but possibly forever" because they'll say screw it and stick with IE.

    I loved Aardvark (it was so handy in cleaning up Mapquest stuff, news articles...) but it's become increasingly broke and in RC1 it's apparently fully dead until I hunt for the website (it didn't play well with the updater) to see if it's got an update. Stop-or-reload... same thing. Grease Monkey? Gone. Try searching for a torrent using the new Firefox. Now, these middle-adapters, the ones you have to prove the value of software to, aren't known for being upgrade happy (think your mom, still running IE 5 how many years after 6.0?) or else they may have tried Firefox earlier, but when they do upgrade, they don't want to switch to a different, competing extension becuase there's is broken, nor do they want to lose functionality they've become used to.

    The extensions are awesome, best part of the browser but I think down the road the breakability of extensions is going to throttle the number of new-users. Think of old Netscape where slowly it became a nerd-only alternative, depsite their protests that it was more secure/more capable/better browser but IE kept winning people over because it (a) kept adapting to enable new features (I can't think of any, but that's because I haven't used Netscape since 2000), and (b) retained most of it's features.

    IMO, people would rather use something that lacks features but has all the ones they're attached to than use something that introduces them to new features, and then takes them away.

    Not every extension is going to be the next big thing... that extension so useful that the browser gods themselves reach down to integrate it into their next version, but if there's a user base at all for it, they're not going to like being told they can't use it with the newest toys because the developer didn't think there was enough of a user base to continue his support. Yeah, it's his or her decision to not update, but the user isn't going to care... they're going to blame Firefox.

    Then again, this whole theory only applies to the semi-casual users who know enough to find and love extensions and not to the people who don't know anything about extensions or will just be using the browser as is.

    1. Re:Maybe they should fix broken extensions first? by arekq · · Score: 1
      Maybe they should fix broken extensions first

      That's precisely what they're doing: a contest to encourage extension developers to update their extensions to Fx1.5.

    2. Re:Maybe they should fix broken extensions first? by dyoung9090 · · Score: 1

      No, read the article.

      "The contest is expected to generate hundreds of new extensions for Firefox, allowing people to further personalize their Web browsing experience and to make surfing the Web even more fun and convenient."

      "We're eager to see what our developer community has in store for Firefox users with this call for the next wave of extensions,"

      Yes the contest prizes do say "new/upgraded" but clearly the goal is to encourage *new* extensions. You'll see it in the context of the article... how they talk about how they enjoy "the breadth and depth of the Firefox Extensions currently available" but only after talking about the "next wave of extensions" designed to make use of 1.5's new features (and one could make an arguement that some of the new modifications were inspired, or at least accomplished, by earlier extensions) and links to a website "to find resources and pointers to help create extensions for Firefox" which, while I'm sure would be helpful to current developers is obviously a nod to the fact that it hopes to promote the creation of extensions.

      Modifying broken extensions is at best a result of the new Firefox, and not a result of the contest. There are several extensions with questionable use (in their current form) but lots of promise that have already been abandoned.

      Poor feedback, people who can't request features nicely (and an argument can be made that I'm one of them, but I just want to repeat that I'm not trying to complain so much as point out a potential problem) and people who start something and then move on to something else that's more important (work, lives, family) have stopped the development of some extensions. Yes, some of these are probably wastes of time for most of us, but with some work (and more polite response) they could have easily become the next new thing.

      I do also realize that some are in sleeper mode, waiting for the official release, but I'm just saying that there is the potential for some problems when people go to upgrade (and they'll be more likely to do so when updating is made easy, as the new version tries to do) only to find out features they've grown to love don't work.

      To put this in a way Slashdotters understand: If Microsoft were to issue the next IE and told users they had to wait a week because Bookmarks was now a seperate department and the head of that department was having a really bad couple of days so nobody could make it compatable, then everyone would be up in arms.

      Before anyone tries to argue that bookmarks are an inherent feature in IE while the extensions are voluntary installs, I would like to pre-argue that the ability to add those extensions is an inherent feature in Firefox. When websites "break" in new browsers because they weren't the absolute best coded, people become enraged at the lack of embracing new uniform standards and while it's probably impossible to come up with useful extensions that are theoretically forever-compatable with all future versions of Firefox I'm just pointing out that some people aren't going to like it when their features break.

    3. Re:Maybe they should fix broken extensions first? by arekq · · Score: 1
      I see your points. But I think it is unreasonable to expect the core team to (manually) fix outdated extension as that would put too much workload on them. However, I think (theoretically anyways) they may be able to provides better tools to help with the problem. For example:
      • yet another extension, maintained by the core team, to scan for use of changed APIs in an extension.
      • document a summary of api changes, with recommended usage change where applicable. (They probably have the list of bugs, but I wonder whether they maintain a summary.)
    4. Re:Maybe they should fix broken extensions first? by dyoung9090 · · Score: 1

      I just posted in another reply that I think some kind of donation-per-extension plan might help with the delay between upgrades (5% of downloaders paying 25 cents may not add up to all that much, but considering the nothing these guys are getting now might be enough to swing the guys who've given up on their extensions back into the game) but I do acknowledge the almost impossibility of having forever-compatable extensions.

      Do I have a solution? No. I'm just pointing out something that I think could be an obstacle in getting mainstream acceptance. IE is stealthy... it'll wait till the feature takes hold, integrate it into their thing and then boom, it's part of the core... power users apreciate getting something they were once only able to get in Firefox and the mainstreamers know it won't leave them.

      Contrary to the maxim, people would rather never have loved at all than to have loved and lost. I may not like losing a few extensions every upgrade, but it's worth it (to me at least) for the new extensions/features that pop up, but of the 87% not using Firefox, what percentage of them are going to use a new browser who's main feature (the only thing that's going to differentiate Firefox from the next IE, which should have tabbed browsing, in most of their minds) is that they can add in extensions that they'll periodically have to replace with new extensions or go without for weeks until new updates are made.

  61. What? by Naerymdan · · Score: 1

    Just what kind of asshole are you anyway? For your information, Québecois nationnalists don't want to go to a butt-mouthed France, they just want a free Québec from Canada. That's not hard to understand: Québec pays more than it's share of nationnal taxes to compensate for some of the other provinces and while Canada is mostly english, Quében is mostly French. And, sorry to dissapoint you, but our 'mongrel dialect' has been proven to be a purer french than the one spoke in France. You'd think 'putain de bordel de merde' would get old no? Lastly, did you never concider that in que Québecois's mind, France' frenchs are total high-nosed jerks wads with a weird way of talking? Vincent P.S.: Yes, i know, I just shallowed it bait, hook, sinker and line.

    --
    Bah.
    1. Re:What? by PoprocksCk · · Score: 1

      As a graduate (victim? ;-) of the French Immersion program of Canada (I live in Ontario, Greater Toronto Area) and a current French Minor -- here's my point of view on the whole idea of the separist movement...

      First off, that guy was an asshole for what he said. My comment has nothing to do with yours as a response to his, but for some reason your comment triggered this one.

      You guys obviously like to be 'different.' There's no argument there. Not that being different is a bad thing -- it's great that we have such a flourishing culture in our country, and going to Québec is a lot like stepping in to a new country with a whole other culture, and a whole other way of living.

      However, in some parts of the province, I've noticed a kind of 'elite' attitude that really bothers me. The whole attitude is summed up in one recurring experience: I walk into a restaurant, I order in French. They respond in English. To me that is probably one of the rudest things a Québecois can do to a Canadian in my position who has spent almost all of his life learning French. I guess my accent was slightly 'off' or something (admittedly we learn "French French" in our schools, not the Québecois dialect) -- but the least you guys can do is try to take some consideration into the fact that many people in English Canada want to embrace your culture, and don't appreciate it being shoved back up our asses like that.

      Hopefully my experiences at McGill (where I hope to attend in two years) will be a little more pleasant than my awkward ventures through Québec (city).

    2. Re:What? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1
      However, in some parts of the province, I've noticed a kind of 'elite' attitude that really bothers me. The whole attitude is summed up in one recurring experience: I walk into a restaurant, I order in French. They respond in English. To me that is probably one of the rudest things a Québecois can do to a Canadian in my position who has spent almost all of his life learning French.


      No that's not elitist. Most people think it's easier for you if they try to speak your language the same way you will try to speak their language. And a lot of business I worked at think it's important to speak english to english customers. They consider that since you are the customer they are the one that have to make the effort to speak in the language they are less used to.

      Next time, just say you prefer speaking in french.

      I did saw elitists however but they aren't a majority. And some regions have a lot more of them than other. For instance, if you try to order an english book in a book store in Bas-Saint-Laurent, they will probably look at you as if you were a traitor to the nation. Lac-Saint-Jean too (probably more). The rest of Quebec is mostly okay.
      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The rest of Quebec is mostly okay.

      The rest of Quebec is mostly empty.

    4. Re:What? by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      The 2 regions I mentioned makes 7% of Quebec's population.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
  62. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Last I heard, Australia was supposed to be a favoured ally. I know we are a third world country maskerading as a first world power but sheeesh excluding us for that should knock out most of the EU too.

  63. New/Updated by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Well, this is a good tactic to get people to update their extensions to the newer FF versions. I know that it would make it just a little more worth updating my extensions because of this. (I was going to do it anyway, but I am content using the older FF version and updating to the new one is not on my priority list.)

  64. RTFRN! by geobeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the whole reason they have pre-release software; so extension writers have a chance to update their code before final release.

    If you want everything to work right away, don't use beta software!

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    1. Re:RTFRN! by dyoung9090 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not JUST a beta issue.

      I had the same problem when I installed Firefox to my new laptop. The new version that had just been released at the time was 1.0.7 (which, to the best of my knowledge was the last non-beta they released as it is the one you download from getfirefox.com). I had a dozen or so extensions on my desktop computer that were wonderful and often useful, and instead of making a list of extensions to check back on routinely to make sure that IF they did get updated I would finally be able to use that functionality again, I moved on to other extensions that were either poorly done but compatable with the new version, not quite the same features but close enough for me to do what I was doing or I just gave up on them and went back to pre-Firefox methods of doing whatever they did.

      Betas aren't the only things to break extensions. Believe it or not, some of us know what happens when we go to a beta, and we take the chances anyway. Sometimes the number of new features outweighs the benefits of a couple of pre-existing tweaks. It doesn't mean we sign away our right to prefer somethings the way they were.

      So, using your logic, I should have gone scraping around P2P sites for a pre 1.0.7 version (keeping a few extensions I enjoyed but giving up all the new ones that I wanted more) just because 1.0.7 wasn't out long enough for about a dozen random guys to update their extensions.

      Part of the point of release notes is to serve as a kind of informed warning and you apparently are too thick to realize the concept of a trade-off. Sometimes you give up something you like for something you like more. It doesn't stop you from liking what you gave up, it just means you liked your new thing more.

      In slashdot-terms, it's like moving out of your parents basement. Yes, you like living there because they pay for all the bills and your mother is very good about filling your Dorito stash, BUT if you move out, you could bring women over. You won't, but that's not the point. You weigh the two (Mommy buying doritos, the potential of meeting someone real) and make a decision.

    2. Re:RTFRN! by geobeck · · Score: 1

      True, but Firefox 1.5 is a major release, hence moving up from 1.0.x all the way to 1.5. While it might be reasonable to expect most of your extensions from 1.0.6 to work in 1.0.7, it's less reasonable to expect everything to carry over to 1.5.

      And the OP wasn't talking about a stable version; he was talking about 1.5 RC1, and seemed to expect that everything should have worked, even though it is still a pre-release version.

      This is one of the small hurdles that open source software faces. The core dev team can make everything work in the application itself, but if users have come to rely on third-party extensions, and the extension writers don't keep up, some people blame the core team, not the third party.

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  65. Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Quebec by nierdal · · Score: 5, Informative

    The reason why Quebec is excluded is because here in Quebec the lottery is regulated by the RACJ, a goverment agency. The lottery have is own laws, and therefore if the Mozilla Fundation do not accept to fill the papers that loto Quebec ask for they cannot participate.

    See : http://www.racj.gouv.qc.ca/section.asp?lang=en&noS ection=4&noGrappe=5

    Also, I would be great if the slashdot community would stop bashing Quebec about the "language police". THERE IS NOT LANGUAGE POLICE IN QUEBEC, this is bullshit!. There are only laws that make in sort that everything must be written in french on commercial products, and that the french must occupate the same space than the english. That's all! So if a consummer see a poorly written french on a products or an ad, it can make a complaint to the Quebec french language office that will HELP the seller to translate is products to french. You heard it right! They will HELP without any fees!

    Why this? Hey we are 6 millions french (and 1 million english) in Quebec. There's 330 millions english speaker around US! How you would expect US to keep our language without laws? If you were 6 millions english speaker with 330 millions spanish what would you do if you were actualy enjoying your cultural heritage? You would not stand up to protect your liberty of speaking whatever language you want?

    That's why the law is there.

    See Wikipedia if you want to lean a bit more about Quebec. Very good description IMHO. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec

    (Oh and sorry I know my english isn't that good..)

  66. Re:extensions are great... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could backup the extentions installation files, then reinstalling them is a lot quickier. Once done. Hit the check for extention update option.

  67. Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Canada INCLUDES Quebec!

  68. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Eccles · · Score: 1

    You gotta wonder though, how exactly would other country's laws matter? Someone from Tuvalu creates a cool plug-in, so Gerv and co. ship him a neat gadget. How would any country's cops ever get involved?

    Or, if the Moz folks said "we're going to send neat gadgets to the coolest extensions introduced before 1.5 is released", would that avoid the contest issues? That's a declaration of action, not a contest per se.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  69. Any Ideas? by honeypotslash · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any great ideas for an extension they can give me? :D:D
    --
    Get your Free MacMini's here

    1. Re:Any Ideas? by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Make one that downloads Opera and Proxomitron, then uninstalls Firefox. I'm guessing they want useful extensions, and it doesn't get much beter than that.

  70. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

    Just look at any US game show. Anybody who wins any prize has to pay the taxes on that prize before they get it. Even if they don't live in the country, and they will never reap the benefits of the taxes. Happens to Canadians all the time who go on US game shows. Canadians don't pay taxes on prize winning. Oprah audience members also had to pay taxes on cars that she gave to all the audience members when there wasn't even a contest. Everyone in the audience got a car.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  71. Attention Quebecois, Africans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll front your extensions for you (I'm in the US). If I win, I'll let you come over and play on my new alienware machine.

  72. Form manager "on steroids" by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    I had a great idea for a Firefox plugin. It is like a form manager on steriods.
    Basically, what it does is record every bit of information that you enter via the web browser, be it posts on forums such as this one, or passwords, or personal data in online forms, or bank details. This plugin remebers everything (or coarse, the data is protected by the master password).
    You can search the data stored - nothing that you enter will ever be lost - so for instance you can find that slashdot post that you wrote back in 1998.
    It automatically fills in data when you visit an online form in an intellegent manner (for instance if you filled in you address on one form in a field called "addr." and then you go to different website that has a form field called "address" it will make a guess that the two fields are the same thing and fill it in automatically)
    And lastly, it will work on 100% of all web sites. (This is important, because the current Firefox password manager only works for about 60% of websites.)
    The only catch is that I don't live in US or Canada.

    1. Re:Form manager "on steroids" by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      not flamebaiting here but personally i cant stand form storing, password remembering, the history, url autocomplete and all the other "make your life easier" bloat. if i could code properly i wouldnt write an extension to disable all this i'd recompile FF with none of it in, and make it use a default local profile (="no install", handy for when you have FF on D: and you format C:) and never ever pop up alerts like the first-time you submit a form, go to/leave an SSL page, etc etc etc. a few choice cookies (e.g. auto login to slashdot) and a heap of bookmarks is all i need

      bah /rant

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  73. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Eccles · · Score: 1

    At least under U.S. law, I can give you a gift of somewhat more than $10,000 without tax issues. Granted, the IRS would look askance if there was anything that looked like an employer/employee relationship, but I don't think they could see that here.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  74. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by anaesthetica · · Score: 2, Funny
    (Oh and sorry I know my english isn't that good..)
    You better be sorry. This is the Quebec Language Police. Your post doesn't give equal space to the French language. Due to a provision in our extradition treaty, you are to be sent to Le Gitmo. Have a bon day.
  75. Hello? Deer Park? by Alias777 · · Score: 1

    What the hell about those who have the wont to download nightly builds, such as Deer Park A1, 1.6, which is compatible with NO 1.5 plugins?!

  76. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey we are 6 millions french (and 1 million english) in Quebec

    That is BS, also many of the french speakers can also speak english. Most of the movies, music, video games, and computer software, simply isn't available in French or is not produced in French, yet French-only media remains less popular and has less shelf space in Quebec. Quebeckers are capable of speaking English, they have to communicate with the rest of Canada as well! Likewise, English speakers in Quebec speak French as well.

    There are only laws that make in sort that everything must be written in french on commercial products, and that the french must occupate the same space than the english.

    Yet it does not even happen anyway... Check out "Future Shop," "Radio Shack," "Blockbuster," "Micro Bytes," etc... There are also many video games and movies that have no french at all.

    In the company where I work, everything is in English and french speakers MUST know English to be able to work here as it is a company owned by another country, produces products for another country, and their regulations are all in English and French regulations cannot be provided as they do not even produce them in that country.

    Why raise a bar on what language a citizen must communicate in? Look at the US which has a thriving Spanish population. They have no mandates or regulations on language, and there is Spanish nearly on every product!

    We could have the same situation we have in Quebec right now without the language laws. It could even be better as we would not be constantly denied products from other countries because of the requirements. It would be more important to be bilingual, which reflects Quebec's culture as a multicultural and multilingual society. It's not even all about English and French here, we have many from India, Italy, Greece, China, etc.

    If you were 6 millions english speaker with 330 millions spanish what would you do if you were actualy enjoying your cultural heritage?

    There is a difference between enjoying your cultural heritage and DICTATING what it should be. That is CONTRIVING a culture. There is a very big difference. One is natural, the other is fabricated. Quebec should join the world and not try and dictate how everyone should act.

  77. Extension Tutorial by obender · · Score: 1

    Maybe a bit late to ask but can anyone indicate a good tutorial for writing Firefox extensions?

  78. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by IronyChef · · Score: 1
    There are only laws that make in sort that everything must be written in french on commercial products, and that the french must occupate the same space than the english.

    (Obligatory disclaimer: I love visiting Québec and do so regularly, but...)

    I believe you're wrong about the signage law, which requires French sized twice the English, and Google turns up numerous references to this:

    In line with this opinion, the Charter of the French Language (section 58) was eventually amended to allow the concurrent use of another language provided that the French language portion of a public sign, poster or commercial advertising was "markedly predominant." Regulations were also adopted that define the latter expression as ensuring for the French text a much greater visual impact than the other language used. The regulations also establish that a much greater visual impact is achieved if the space occupied by the French text is twice as large as that accorded to the other language used, and if the same ratio of two to one is reflected in the size of the French text itself.
    And earlier attempts banned English altogether:
    The original version of the sign law, better known as Bill 101, barred all languages other than French on outdoor commercial signs. The law was amended in 1993, after the United Nations Human Rights Committee intervened, calling it a human-rights violation. The new law requires that French be "markedly predominant."
  79. Prizes by bmalia · · Score: 1

    This prizes are kind of lame. A new iPOD or PC isn't much motivation to put a lot of time into creating an extension.

    --
    There's no place like ~/
    1. Re:Prizes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell did you expect, a house?

  80. uh, wrong by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 1

    That's complete BS. Most if not all contests I've ever seen that include Canada don't do any special case about Quebec. Loto-Quebec has laws restricting lottery in QUEBEC ONLY. It can't restrict contests from abroad or on the Internet.

    1. Re:uh, wrong by perogiex · · Score: 1

      Quebec contests require that the rules and odds of winning etc.. be made publicly available in french. This excludes many US contests.

    2. Re:uh, wrong by Recovery1 · · Score: 1
      It got me wondering too, so I did a quick google search on the subject and found this link http://contests.about.com/library/weekly/aa100105a .htm

      From the article:
      When a sweepstakes is open to Canada, you will usually see that it is void in the province of Quebec. This is because of the stringent rules the Regie des Loteries et Courses du Quebec imposes, e.g. the company offering the contest must have a head office or place of business in Quebec. That leaves out a huge number of companies and their promotions. As a result, many companies just void Quebec in their elegibility rules.

  81. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by nierdal · · Score: 1

    That is BS, also many of the french speakers can also speak english. Most of the movies, music, video games, and computer software, simply isn't available in French or is not produced in French, yet French-only media remains less popular and has less shelf space in Quebec. Quebeckers are capable of speaking English, they have to communicate with the rest of Canada as well! Likewise, English speakers in Quebec speak French as well.

    That is completly false. Nearly all movies are available in french in Quebec. Concerning the games, the law stipulate that they must include instructions in french. And the french media are extremely powerful in Quebec... See Quebecor who has TVA, Journal de Montreal, and many radio stations.

    Yet it does not even happen anyway... Check out "Future Shop," "Radio Shack," "Blockbuster," "Micro Bytes," etc... There are also many video games and movies that have no french at all.

    Brands and names are not subjet to the law.

    In the company where I work, everything is in English and french speakers MUST know English to be able to work here as it is a company owned by another country, produces products for another country, and their regulations are all in English and French regulations cannot be provided as they do not even produce them in that country.

    That's completly normal, english IS the business language, and (this is a educationnal issue) everybody in Quebec should be able to speak a perfect english.


    Why raise a bar on what language a citizen must communicate in? Look at the US which has a thriving Spanish population. They have no mandates or regulations on language, and there is Spanish nearly on every product!


    Because the spanish population in USA is way more than 6 millions.

     
    We could have the same situation we have in Quebec right now without the language laws. It could even be better as we would not be constantly denied products from other countries because of the requirements. It would be more important to be bilingual, which reflects Quebec's culture as a multicultural and multilingual society. It's not even all about English and French here, we have many from India, Italy, Greece, China, etc.


    You seem to be a Quebecer, but I think you should got outside montreal sometimes. It is extremely rare that a product is denied because of the language laws, and that happen only when the seller dont want to translate is product. But I'm agree with you, it is important for Quebec to be a multicultural society. But I don't think this is a raison to lost our main culture. (Even if I know that most Quebecer dont see what is their own culture)...

     
    There is a difference between enjoying your cultural heritage and DICTATING what it should be. That is CONTRIVING a culture. There is a very big difference. One is natural, the other is fabricated. Quebec should join the world and not try and dictate how everyone should act.


    It's not dictation, it's protection because from a purely efficient point of view, everybody in the world should speak english.

    You see, fabrication of the culture is what you get with Star Academy (or let's says Survivor for USA). They take part of our culture and market is has a commercial production. But it is not our true culture.

    I suggest you to see a great movie on this subjet : C.R.A.Z.Y

    Very interesting if you want to learn why the Quebecer culture is mainly a derivation of the american culture with a tablespoon of european culture. After all, what most Quebecer want is to protect what make them proud for 400 years, french, and be PART of america. If you read about Quebec history, you'll find that is mostly because of USA that there is french in Quebec. Without them, we would all speak english. I'm very thankfull to american for this, and I want to protect the luck that we have to be able to speak french in america. I know that the french don't have a good reputation, but sometimes people should learn to make difference between an french of France and a french of Quebec. Our culture is completly different, and we much more like french american.

  82. Re:Why only U.S., Canadian and European contestant by Alcilbiades · · Score: 1

    Yes there are restrictions on high-end computing stuff. I am not sure if it is still the case but for a long time PGP encryption would land you jail time if you copied it to a disc and left the US with it.

  83. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1
    THERE IS NOT LANGUAGE POLICE IN QUEBEC, this is bullshit!. There are only laws that make in sort that everything must be written in french on commercial products, and that the french must occupate the same space than the english.


    There is obviously a difference in definitions here. If the USA founded a GOVERNMENT task force that:
    1. proactively sought billboards, web sites(!), business cards and newspaper ads that did not predominanty feature English
    2. Assessed first time violators fines of upward of 2,000 dollars for non-compliance

    They would be called far worse than "language police" here on Slashdot. That said, as far as I'm concerned, every you have the right to protect your cultural heritage in this way. I wish that we could get the same thing here in the USA on a state by state basis.

  84. HTML Editor by epiphanius · · Score: 1

    I know what extension I would like to see - make the 'view source' feature in FF editable. 'View source' in FF produces very nice tabbed and color coded html. But it is currently uneditable.

    I'm too lazy / busy to learn programming my self right now.

  85. Too late by cerberusss · · Score: 1
    competition to develop [...] an innovative new extension

    This is far too late. Everything has already been invented and worked into an extension.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Too late by bclark · · Score: 1

      Yes, certainly there will never be anything new created from this point forward.

    2. Re:Too late by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Nope. I can think of only one thing to include as an extension, and that's Emacs. *shivers*

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  86. TMP Rules! by Monimonika · · Score: 1

    Tabbrowser Preferences? *spits at TBP*

    Seriously, other than that it's integrated into the Options window, TBP has nothing over Tab Mix Plus. The only reason it's so 'popular' despite its 3-star rating is because it happens to have a cozy spot on the main extensions page where it gets the most exposure to those who haven't experienced better.

  87. Re:extensions are great... but... by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    Even simpler is associating the xpi filetype with Firefox (IIRC you can load Thunderbird extentions directly from the extention dialog box), and opening the extention. In my experience, it only works if FF isn't running when you load the extention. But once FF loads, the extention will install (after that annoying wait that I disabled on my personal machine with another MRTech extention). That's how I installed the extentions on the work machine I'm currently typing from.

  88. Pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create an extension that makes it unbelievably effortless to collect/browse high quality porn without ever having to visit any porn sites.

    You'll have that Alienware hands down.

    Although realistically it wouldn't win due to ethical controversy--but don't let that stop you!

    (actually, if you made it a "general" image browser, but applicable to porn, it could slide with the judges..)

  89. I'll gladly act as a middleman... by koick · · Score: 1

    I'm in the US. If someone outside the legal borders wins or wants to win, I'd be glad to accept the gift on their behalf and then ship it to them. I think the restriction is crazy too, but I'm willing to work around it....

  90. Re:extensions are great... but... by insignificant1 · · Score: 1

    Ah, but MRTech Local Install, you can select 25 extensions AT ONCE, and install them all, at once. That's the simplicity, the beauty of it.

  91. Slashdot trolled again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twice in two days!

    The contest DOES NOT EXCLUDE Asia, South America, Europe, Australia etc. TFA and TF Contest Rules only mention that the contest rules have been VERIFIED TO BE LEGAL in US and Canada.

    They are just trying to cover their asses againt lawsuits one continent at a time...

    As incredible as it may seem, the shipping of a lame PC overseas IS possible with current technology.

    255 comments and no one bothered to RTFA.

    Only on Slashdot.

  92. What about SeaMonkey? by alexo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does it support plugins and, if it does, can it use the FireFox/ThunderBird ones?

    1. Re:What about SeaMonkey? by Finuvir · · Score: 1
      Does it support plugins and, if it does, can it use the FireFox/ThunderBird ones?
      Plugins are not the same as extensions. But yes, Seamonkey supports both plugins and extensions. The extension system for Seamonkey is nowhere near as polished as Firefox's, but it's similar. You can't just drop any old Firefox extension into Seamonkey and have it work, but it is possible to make an extension that works for both.

      Oh, and just to pick a nit: there's no CamelCase in the names of Firefox and Thunderbird.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
    2. Re:What about SeaMonkey? by alexo · · Score: 1


      > Plugins are not the same as extensions. But yes, Seamonkey supports
      > both plugins and extensions. The extension system for Seamonkey is
      > nowhere near as polished as Firefox's, but it's similar. You can't just
      > drop any old Firefox extension into Seamonkey and have it work, but it
      > is possible to make an extension that works for both.

      Perhaps I should elaborate.

      Currently I am using IE (and its derivatives) and considering switching to either Seamonkey or Firefox/Thunderbird.

      I have heard opinions (mostly here) that Seamonkey is preferred to the FF/TB combination but my concern is that the interesting plugins/extensions will not work with it.

      Thus the question.

      > Oh, and just to pick a nit: there's no CamelCase in the names of
      > Firefox and Thunderbird.


      Noted.

    3. Re:What about SeaMonkey? by Finuvir · · Score: 1
      Currently I am using IE (and its derivatives) and considering switching to either Seamonkey or Firefox/Thunderbird.

      I have heard opinions (mostly here) that Seamonkey is preferred to the FF/TB combination but my concern is that the interesting plugins/extensions will not work with it.

      A minority of people prefer Seamonkey to Firefox and Thunderbird. I'm not sure what their reasons are. Maybe it's because Seamonkey has some features built in for which Firefox requires extensions. I suspect most Seamonkey users were using Mozilla before Firefox came along and they're happy enough not to switch. Most new Mozilla users will use Firefox.

      Most Firefox extensions won't work in Seamonkey. I'd say 90% or more, though that's just a guess. If you plan to use extensions Firefox is the browser for you.

      --
      Why is anything anything?
  93. RTF MESSAGE by dyoung9090 · · Score: 1

    Hello, I am the original poster and as such, I can assure you that I did not expect everything to work (hell, it pops up with a screen telling me which add-ons it's going to disable.) Every update breaks a few extensions. I'm not blaming the core team for the extensions, I'm just griping that there's not some way of having the best of both worlds (longer lasting compatability with the benefits of third party extensions) and I also realize that it's not possible. Sometimes we complain about things that can't be changed.

    Personally, I think a pay-per-extension scheme might be a great option for the problem of broken extensions. Establish some revenue model for extension makers... like ads on their Mozilla Update page so people with the most popular/most useful extensions get some scratch for their efforts while even the smaller extensions can see some kind of reward. Hell, give users a way to transfer some cash to Mozilla and then divy it up to extension makers they like. If 5% of the downloaders for any given extension gave up 25 cents they'd have more incentive to keep their extensions current.

    Of course then there'd be people upset when extensions they've "paid for" break, so it's not a perfect situation, but there's always room for improvement.

  94. GF extension by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    I want a firefox extension that searches through personals and finds all the hotties.. then sends them a cool email detailing why they want me... and then if that doesn't work it goes out on the town and introduces me to hot chicks at nightclubs.. uhm.. well.. that's what I want..

    --
    once more into the breach
  95. Language Police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we just drop English and French all together and try Newspeak? And have the government enforce "everything must be written in Newspeak on commercial products". Tell me that's just a law and not language police?

    If there are 330 millions of spanish speakers... learning spanish would just be much more attractive wouldn't it? Having products in french should be voluntary, not enforced. You can put up your great wall of China all you want around Quebec to protect your "cultural heritage", globalization will eventually crush it through economic means.

    Now if you had written that comment in French... your ideas wouldn't have gotten through to most english speakers on slashdot.

  96. Re:RTFOP by geobeck · · Score: 1

    NOOOOOOOOO!

    Okay, that long, drawn-out negative was aimed at one specific suggestion: turning Mozilla into Adware. Having Pay-Pal donation buttons on the extension makers' home pages is a good idea. Or possibly having a central Pay-Pal donation button on the Firefox extensions page that would let you choose which extension writer you want to donate to. And depending on how the MPL differs from the GPL, extension writers may already be able to create comercial extensions (haven't RTFMPL).

    But putting advertising on the Firefox UI is a Bad Idea(TM). It alone would take Firefox from the growing shadow in IE's rearview mirror to the forgotten depths of browser obscurity.

    And you're right; I didn't read your entire original post (skimmed until the page break). There's only so much /. I can get away with reading at work. ;)

    --
    Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
  97. Re:RTFOP by dyoung9090 · · Score: 1

    Well I think we're finally hammering each other into agreement! I also don't think adware would be good. In fact, it would be damn near impossible to work with if banner ads or something similar popped up when we used some extensions. I was talking about the actual download sites. Let Mozilla worry about getting advertisers/screening out the crap and then they can divy up the few cents they earn click/hundred-click amongst the people who get the most downloads. The paypal donation buttons would be a bitch, if only because many of the extensions that people use aren't all that useful. If X is paying a token sum of $100 for a paint program, he won't see the benefit of paypalling 2 bucks to the developer of the paint-selector tool because he knows he can keep using it for free and that 2 bucks is a little much for a short-cut for something he can already do, just with 2 or 3 extra clicks. Anything less than $2.00 and the loss to paypal takes away from the spirit of all the sharing. Besides, paypal is such a bitch. I'd rather give it right to some kind of Mozilla Fiduciary Fund and have them assign it. Then again, you run the risk of profit-based programming (which isn't all that bad... it gives us some of our best stuff) where they're not making the extension for the sake of making it and then being rewarded, they're making it for the sake of being rewarded, even just a little, and when they're not rewarded, they stop making it. Every system has problems.

  98. Re:extensions are great... but... by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
    Even simpler is associating the xpi filetype with Firefox (IIRC you can load Thunderbird extentions directly from the extention dialog box), and opening the extention.


    There's no need to do file associations - if you are in a situation where you need to save the file to the disk, just drag it onto one of the Mozilla windows. The XPI will install as expected.

  99. Bayesian filtering... by Senzei · · Score: 1
    Maybe someone who knows more about the performance issues of this would be able to add something, but what are the possibilities for some bayesian filtering on the html code of pop-ups?

    At first it would probably be enough to just look at the html source sent out by the pop up, but eventually you would need to investigate at least part of the constructed dom tree after the page has loaded to keep people from using javascript to unpack their ad.

    --
    Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  100. Re:extensions are great... but... by brontus3927 · · Score: 1

    Even simpler! Thanks! I'll keep that in mind next time I'm installing a saved extention

  101. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by shadow_slicer · · Score: 1

    If there were 6 million English speakers with 330 million Spanish, I would learn Spanish (incidentally that's why I'm learning Chinese).

    "Cultural heritage" is a sort of reactionary bullshit that people like to pull out so they can talk about how bad things are now. Culture constantly changes, merging or reacting with other cultures it meets. While you might say that some pieces of culture are "lost" in this process, they are usually just replaced by new pieces of culture that better fit the needs of the current society.
    Of course these laws aren't about protecting culture anymore than they are about protecting freedom of speech.
    As you said, it requires you to speak both French and English equally. If you want to speak Spanish or Japanese, that's just too bad -- only French is sacred. And that's only on commercial signs and products. If you decide to have a conversation in your own home you can speak whatever language you want (preserve your cultural heritage at home if you choose).

    In short these laws are the cry of the buggy whip makers, the Intelligent Designers and many other groups finding that upon finding their power is fading they try to inact a law which inconveniences a lot of people, just to make them feel important again.

  102. Re:Réfléchir avant de parler! (About Que by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would think that you actually were French, but you put the whole horrible English thing way over the top. You're not for real, you're just trying to get people to pay attention to you on slashdot.