Slashdot Mirror


Linspire CEO Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows

Spy der Mann writes "Noticing the Microsoft threat to withdraw Windows from South Korea, the Linspire CEO, Kevin Carmony, just offered to license every computer in the country with Linspire, for just $5m. This would be around 10 cents / person. 'South Korea could save around a quarter of a billion dollars. More importantly, however, it would break South Korea loose from the monopolistic grasp of Microsoft, which the country currently finds itself under,'"

279 comments

  1. Even more... by Skiron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...innovation from MS :-)

  2. A mixed bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While I'm sure the slashbots will shout and cry about the virtues of linux (despite being Linspire), it sounds more like a grab for attention than anything serious. While I'm sure Carmony could make a bundle on the deal, could he really support all of South Korea? I wonder if he even has a team of translators for the major world languages to begin with!

    1. Re:A mixed bag by rvw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Relax man! Carmony is just doing his job. And Koreans are smart people, so most of the support will be from local companies, probably the companies that now give support on Windows. The change won't be overnight.

    2. Re:A mixed bag by Frankie70 · · Score: 4, Funny

      could he really support all of South Korea?

      He, he could. He could direct all of Korea to Linux
      newsgroups & mailing lists, where geeks will flame
      Koreans to code fixes what bugs they find.

    3. Re:A mixed bag by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No need to hire a huge support staff. He can just use all of S. Kore as his new outsourced call center for the US, and with the money he doesn't pay them, he can build a real local support center in N. Korea with people who speak the local language.

      And oh, yes, add the obligatory:

      4: Profit!!!!

    4. Re:A mixed bag by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Note the possible domino effect. Linspire goes to the ROK, perfects the OS, then targets the Korean market in the US.
      With the precedent in place, and the Unicode kinks worked out, Linspire can then target other Asian markets.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    5. Re:A mixed bag by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      While I'm sure Carmony could make a bundle on the deal, could he really support all of South Korea?

      What is this 'support' you speak of? The article mentions licencing only.

      'Support'? 'Usability'? A Ledi craves not these things.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    6. Re:A mixed bag by iamelgringo000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'll be sure to brush up on how to say "RTFM" in Korean.

    7. Re:A mixed bag by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Korea=HUGE broadband connections.

      Linspire=HUGE updates.

      This is a recipe for disaster. Linspire doesn't have the resources to pull it off. As a marketing plan, it is a good idea. As a realistic plan, it doesn't sound too good.

      $5 million sounds like a decent amount of money for Linspire, but for long-term support, it is just a drop in the bucket.

      I would almost guess that Bill Gates put them up to this. Watching this fail would bring joy to his holidays...

      --
      No reason to lie.
    8. Re:A mixed bag by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All my male, teen students do in their free time is play Starcraft. When I go to a restaurant near lunchtime, the TV is always on OnGameNet (AKA 24 hours CS / Starcraft). The female teens all play MAple Story (online MMORPG). The young adults that I know spend their evenings playing Kart Rider (online racing). Everybody wants to be a progamer when he or she grows up.

      As much as I want Linux to succeed here in S. Korea, HanSoft's 3.2 version is already free, and it isn't doing their market share any good.

      Not a chance of this happening in the private sector.

    9. Re:A mixed bag by afd8856 · · Score: 1

      You need to be a genius to figgure out that it doesn't take much to move a mirror in Korea and use their "humoungous" pipes?

      --
      I'll do the stupid thing first and then you shy people follow...
    10. Re:A mixed bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word:

      BitTorrent.

    11. Re:A mixed bag by yatt · · Score: 1
      You're forgetting that north and south korea aren't on the friendliest of terms. And that S Korea is no longer a 3rd world country. The savings, if any, probably won't be as big as you imagine.

      Locality is subjective. To you they may be local by comparison to the US but to them they're still 2 separate countries. Would you consider Canada or Mexico to be local?

    12. Re:A mixed bag by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      OMG Zerg rush!!111 Kekekekek!11!!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    13. Re:A mixed bag by fhic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, of course, Linspire is nearly useless without the Click-N-Run subscription service. (CNR is Linspire's slick automated apt-get functionality.) TFA makes no mention of whether he's planning to give that away too. I would suspect not. All the other recent Linspire giveaways have not included CNR, or have included very brief trial runs.

    14. Re:A mixed bag by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Starcraft and Halflife play great in WINE. That Maple Story crap requires IE, but the rest of that shit they're better off running Linux for. Maybe when more recent games are the big thing over there that'll be a valid point. And who knows, this Maple Story thing might even run in WINE too but I'm way too lazy to run IE in it to find out.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    15. Re:A mixed bag by bigman2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Move to Korea = $$$
      New hardware to handle the load = $$$
      Big pipes to service traffic = $$$ (even in Korea)
      Cost to maintain data center = $$$

      Like I said...$5 million doesn't go too far when you have to set up that type of infrastructure.

      They're not talking about something small here - they're talking about supporting an entire country. You can't do that from your mom's basement.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    16. Re:A mixed bag by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think I heard once that only old koreans use newsgroups and mailing lists.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:A mixed bag by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Who's talking about supporting anything? Almost none of the Windows installations there are supported either, because they're pirated. That's what started this whole thing. Presumably S. Koreans would just use and share Linspire the same way they use Windows now, only legally... though why S Korea would bother to pay the $5m to be legit, I don't know. Maybe to get the WTO off their back?

    18. Re:A mixed bag by namekuseijin · · Score: 1

      "New hardware to handle the load = $$$"

      This is true for Windows Vista, not Linux.

      "Big pipes to service traffic = $$$"

      I don't think i understand what you mean. Supply chain? Network downloads?...

      "Cost to maintain data center = $$$"

      I'm sure these are lower than if Koreans go for the hardware-sucking and license-hungry Vista...

      --
      I don't feel like it...
    19. Re:A mixed bag by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      $5 million could be the cost of setting up a world wide call center based in South Korea.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    20. Re:A mixed bag by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      It's South Korea. After a year, they'll be selling US support. Millions of well-educated and disciplined geeks learning linux all at once... yipes. They'll be the evangelists to the world, not us.

    21. Re:A mixed bag by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "Linspire=HUGE updates."

      There's this "bittorrent" thing I've been hearing about...

    22. Re:A mixed bag by Cromac · · Score: 1

      Probably true, but if they're going to do local support why would they ever pay for Linspire when there are so many free Linux alternatives? As you said they're smart people, even paying $5 million would be stupid when you could pay $0.

    23. Re:A mixed bag by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Are you familiar with the entire Linspire concept? It is all about downloading...that is what makes them different.

      And you don't download from Bittorrent...you download from Linspire.

      THAT is why this is a big deal.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    24. Re:A mixed bag by abigor · · Score: 1

      South Korea is almost entirely Windows-based. They are the world's biggest gamers (telling them use Wine is an insult), and their huge online community sites, banking sites, etc. etc. are IE-only. There is absolutely no way Linux could even touch the functionality they demand.

      Nice of you to dismiss one of their largest MMORPGs as "crap", too. Unless it is supported flawlessly, no other browser, let alone OS, stands a chance. And I use Wine all the time, and it is FAR from flawless.

    25. Re:A mixed bag by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Slashdot doesn't like Korean: "Reason: Your comment looks too much like ascii art."

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    26. Re:A mixed bag by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      Because no matter what the linux zealots say, Linux is NOT ready for the desktop. You and I might not have any problems setting up a Linux workstation, but when I think of grandparents everywhere trying to install Debian, nothing good can come of it.

      Linspire is targetted at Windows users. They've tried to make it easier to install, use, and maintain. Obviously lots of linux zealots hate it because they feel it's "dumbing down" Linux, but that's the only way Linux is going to capture any significant marketshare in the desktop space. The vast majority of people are not capable of installing and managing a Linux installation, you can't switch over an entire country to a traditional Linux distribution, because you'll effectively destroy most of the PCs in the country when users fail to properly install the OS.

    27. Re:A mixed bag by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      could he really support all of South Korea

      No, because they would have to bundle Cegeda with Lindows too, and support that. South Korea is effectively the world headquarters of gaming, and the PC varieties of those games run on Windows, NOT Linux. Unless you want the people to overthrow the government, you're going to need to provide them with some way of playing their games on their new Linux-based PCs.

      Of course, I would imagine that if Microsoft pulled out of South Korea, a more likely scenario is that the whole country would just pirate Windows. With Microsoft out of the picture, the government could even support it by providing a country-wide Windows Update proxy/server/cache/whatever.

    28. Re:A mixed bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as a result, if Windows were to become difficult / illegal to obtain / unsupported in S. Korea, there would be extreme pressure on game publishers to release non-Windows versions of their software. Is this bad?

    29. Re:A mixed bag by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

      All my male, teen students do in their free time is play Starcraft. When I go to a restaurant near lunchtime, the TV is always on OnGameNet (AKA 24 hours CS / Starcraft). The female teens all play MAple Story (online MMORPG). The young adults that I know spend their evenings playing Kart Rider (online racing). Everybody wants to be a progamer when he or she grows up.

      That's what teens do anywhere they are able. Thing is, people will find a way to do what they want to do. For games, think Transgaming--I just checked their website and they support even the newest games. If piracy is an option, it will happen, too.

    30. Re:A mixed bag by secolactico · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of that MApple Story until now. From the looks of it, it seems to be an even more saccharine version of Mario combined with Animal Crossing, eg, the kind of games that everyone over 21 (or with a Y chromosome) makes fun of, while secretly playing it (provided no one is looking).

      I bought Animal Crossing for my niece and ended up buying one for myself. That's the reason why I don't wanna go within 100 feet of Nintendogs.

      And the only reason I admit to playing Puzzle Pirates is... well... Pirates! Arr!

      --
      No sig
    31. Re:A mixed bag by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      That's why you don't give a n00b a copy of Debian. Besides, the 7 disc package might be a bit intimidating. Of course, I know that CD set contains everything in their repositories, and you may only need the first two discs for a working, graphical system, but the problem remains that Debian isn't a distro for those new to Linux. If you want to send them in that direction, complete with apt-get, it'd be wiser to consider one of the many Debian derivatives that are much easier to install. Not sure I'd go with Progeny, as Anaconda is a bit unwieldy for those unfamiliar with Linux, but MEPIS might be a good idea. And of course, Ubuntu shouldn't be scoffed at either, as their version of the Debian Installer is much more streamlined.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    32. Re:A mixed bag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's bad, are you nuts?!?! How will bill gates feed his children if the Koreans don't pirate windows?

    33. Re:A mixed bag by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      I will publically admit to playing Mario. He is still one of my personal heroes. Of course, I grew up in a day when Mario was still a cool game, so there's a bit of nostalgia to it, too.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    34. Re:A mixed bag by evilneko · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried Linspire (though I did grab the torrent while it was free) but of the distros I've tried in my attempts to move to Linux, Mandrake/Mandriva/whatever they call it now takes the crown of "Best Linux for Windows users" in my opinion.

      After drake I moved on to Deb, unfortunately on a slower machine, but a machine I could dedicate to Linux instead of flipping back to Windows to play games when friends are over. I do agree that Deb is definitely not for newbs. Mandrake, for the most part, just worked. Deb took some work.

      --
      Slashdot - where to disagree, is to be a troll
    35. Re:A mixed bag by idonthack · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you're only making one install CD, it's almost free.

      But we're talking about installing on about FIFTY MILLION computers. If you are going to do that, you will need a factory to print CDs, a distribution network to get them out there, etc... Linspire already has this, and they're offering to do it all for about 10 cents a computer.
      ---
      The only thing I hate more than a hypocrite is a person who hates hypocrites.
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    36. Re:A mixed bag by idonthack · · Score: 1
      South Korea is effectively the world headquarters of gaming, and the PC varieties of those games run on Windows
      Think about what you said, and then think about how much incentive that is for companies to port their games to Linux. Korea may seem like a small country, but it's big enough to influence decisions like this. I'm sure Valve would port the next generation of Half-Life if it would get them 600,000 more sales.

      Disclaimer: I pulled that number out of my ass.
      ---
      "Man, when the day comes, count me in with the robot smashers." - Anonymous Coward
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey
      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    37. Re:A mixed bag by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I am not so convinced that Valve would. Source seems to have been designed with zero effort towards future portability. The engine is deeply reliant on Direct3D, DirectSound, etc.

      I think it would be more likely that Valve would simply make sure their products work well with Cedega (Yes, I've been calling it "Cegeda", I'm an idiot). Cedega can already run Source-based games reasonably well, and a bit of tweaking from Valve both on their side and in the form of contributions to Cedega could make it a rock-solid combination.

      Is it a good combination for linux gamers? Perhaps not. Is it a good combination for Valve? Possible. It might lead to a good linux "port" with a lot less effort than rewriting the engine for another platform. From Valve's point of view that might make more sense.

      It should be noted that Counter-Strike: Source (probably the most popular Source-based product) already runs extremely well under Cedega. Some help from Valve would allow it to run flawlessly.

      Does this mean I'm opposed to linux ports? No! I'm just pointing out that this situation may not lead to more linux ports.

      Cegeda poses an interesting possibility though. Imagine if games, instead of targetting Windows, Linux, or OSX, simply targetted Cedega with an eye towards keeping it compatible with Windows. Cedega could turn into a sort of intermediate environment, much like Microsoft's. Games targetted at Cedega could potentially run properly on all platforms with little extra effort.

    38. Re:A mixed bag by idonthack · · Score: 1

      If they're going to target Cedega for compatibility, why not just use SDL, OpenGL and OpenAL instead of going through another cycle-eating software layer that simply acts as a Direct* wrapper around them? It would enable you to use anything in those libraries without having to worry if the guys over at Transgaming are keeping up with Microsoft.
       
      Writing for what's basically an emulator so you maintain a false "cross-platform" compatibility is not the way to go, and it is not the way it will go. The only way to be truly and effectively cross-platform is to only use cross-platform libraries.
       
      Interesting possibility? Yes. But not very good for anyone.
      ---
      (\(\
      (-.-) Give me back my damn feet!
      Generated by SlashdotRndSig via GreaseMonkey

      --
      Why is it that when you believe something it's an opinion, but when I believe something it's a manifesto?
    39. Re:A mixed bag by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      That is probably good worry assuming every MMORPG is on the PC. Perhaps the next generation of hit games are on the console.

  3. Open letter to S. Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool, just do it

  4. I've got a better offer. by rathehun · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:I've got a better offer. by Spacejock · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd suggest Gentoo but they'd have to build more power stations to cope with millions of CPUs at 100% for 3 or 4 days.

    2. Re:I've got a better offer. by imr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've got a better offer.
      What about they try to find a local solution that will be better localised, that will have local support, that will create jobs, that will keep their cash inside the country, all this meaning that it will help develop a local well adapted independant IT which will benefit their country as a whole?

    3. Re:I've got a better offer. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      You mean "make their own distro"?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:I've got a better offer. by highwind81 · · Score: 5, Informative

      We do have our own distro.

      --
      ------ http://timothylive.net
    5. Re:I've got a better offer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'll license Ubuntu for $4M.

      Can anyone top that bid?

      we need a reverse-eBay bidding system to see how low it can go...

    6. Re:I've got a better offer. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I'll license Windows XP cracked^H^H^H^Hpreactivated international edition for $0.

      Oh wait, that's what they're already running.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:I've got a better offer. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, then, they'll probably want this http://www.haansoftlinux.com/. I've tried the free 3.2 version, and it's pretty good, but didn't want to pay the money for the 4.0 version just to evaluate it, since I wasn't going to use it for my desktop, anyway. Haansoft controls most of the office market here, and they basically give the linux away and sell the office suite for it. I haven't actually ever seen anyone do that, but that's the marketing plan, anyway.

    8. Re:I've got a better offer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, I clicked on the link, and everything was in some strange, foreign language. There is no way this distro is going to catch on if they don't even bother to use English. Sheesh.

    9. Re:I've got a better offer. by rapidweather · · Score: 1

      Just my opinion, but ubuntu takes too long to boot up, when using the livecd version, and one has to answer too many questions. I tried it, but did not like it.

    10. Re:I've got a better offer. by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      "...that will create jobs..."

      According to Google [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=South+Ko rea+unemployment&btnG=Search%5D, unemployment in South Korea is 3.6% right now. That's pretty low; it wouldn't be sound for them to embark on an expansionary fiscal policy. Moreover, even if they did, they should spend money only on the most useful public goods and shouldn't direct economic resources toward building a Linux distribution unless there truly wasn't one that met their needs. Building a local Linux distribution "to create jobs" is nothing more than protectionism, pure and simple, and would hurt their economy in both the long and short runs.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    11. Re:I've got a better offer. by imr · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I had in mind :)

  5. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You know, AC, one has to believe in the first place in order to commit blasphemy... Otherwise it's just trolling :-P

  6. Nice marketing stunt by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really, that is all it is. I like Linux as much as other people, but I don't think South Korea, as a whole, is going to jump on this just as I really don't believe MS will pull out of South Korea. It's all marketing and jocking for positions. There is no way that MS will leave South Korea, one of the most advanced industrial nationas around and a lot more advanced than USA. Oh no, MS will never leave South Korea, it means too much to them.

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    1. Re:Nice marketing stunt by rtb61 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not quite true, microsoft will end up leaving Korea, just like it will inevitably leave every other place on the world, apart from two particular resindences in the US, where a rather pathetic and disreputable duo will mull over what was and sulk about what could have been ;-).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Interesting
      but I don't think South Korea, as a whole, is going to jump on this...

      It's an interesting dilemma for the S. Korean Govt. Giving in to Microsoft would be like negotiating with terrorists - if you cave in to them, it sends the message that blackmail works, and they'll do it again.

      Consequently, South Korea's might feel their best interests like in making the switch, trading the short term inconvenience of the migration against getting out from under the thumb of one of the planet's more rapacious corporations.

      This could get very interesting :D

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    3. Re:Nice marketing stunt by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      I think the duo will rather say something along the lines of "too bad" and spend the rest of their lives perusing the humungous amount of money they have.
      Then again, I don't understand why they're not doing it yet.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    4. Re:Nice marketing stunt by Lucractius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      MS would either become a web services company. or a Linux vendor before they died, theyre too big to just disapear so simply... theyll find a way, even if its by Forking a BSD to build a 100% linux compatible system or something... they could do it with their resources.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    5. Re:Nice marketing stunt by sambira · · Score: 1

      If the South Korean gov does not have a fall back solution, it has lost to MS. In order to negotiate, they have to be willing and able to go to the fall back solution. If this is not done, they have already lost in the negotiation.

    6. Re:Nice marketing stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they do have a fallback position. Microsoft can't do anything in S. Korea without permission from the S. Korean government, and that includes enforcing their copyrights. The government has the option of declaring eminent domain and giving themselves permission to copy Windows as much as they want. Microsoft can shout and cry and bang their heads on the wall, but they are not yet large enough to invade South Korea (and if they back North Korea in an invasion, Washington is going to be rather upset with them.)

    7. Re:Nice marketing stunt by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Consequently, South Korea's might feel their best interests like in making the switch, trading the short term inconvenience of the migration against getting out from under the thumb of one of the planet's more rapacious corporations.
      I don't think most normal S. Koreans will even hear about this. It's not like somebody is in a position to decide all South Koreans will now switch to Linspire. It's no different than if some off-the-wall Linux distro from Mongolia offered to wipe out Windows piracy in the US by allowing us to use their distro for a one-time payment of $5M.
    8. Re:Nice marketing stunt by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well, when the UK started bothering to deal with the IRA terrorists look what happened.

      Your just spouting political nonsence, to deal with terrorists you need to setup negotiations and cave in to some of their demands.
      Prior to the UK dealing with the IRA there was a complete ban on broadcasting the words of Sinn Fein leaders and the terrorsts kept on bombing.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    9. Re:Nice marketing stunt by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Well it's simple, Microsoft shouldn't have dared to threaten a whole entire nation. I'm sure that *responsible* governments everywhere will have their eyes wide open now and take cue from this threat. Switching to OSS should be a national priority and a cause of activism for every concerned citizen worldwide.

    10. Re:Nice marketing stunt by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Well interestingly China is going to face the same dilema in a few years, piracy is rampant there as well.

      If Korea switches to Linux they will have a heck of a lot of technologists ready to support Chinese companies when they switch over to their new OS (Could be Linux could be something built from the ground up.)

    11. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      Your just spouting political [yahoo.com] nonsence

      Now, now. Don't mince your words, say what you mean :)

      Personally, I always interpretted the "no negaotiation" business to mean non-negotiation in hostage and blackmail situations. Trying to address the complaints of your aggressors and find some common ground between opposing positions is always going to be a good idea.

      But so long as you conceed the aptness of the terrorism analogy, does that mean that you think South Korea owes Redmond some concessions?

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    12. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      It's not like somebody is in a position to decide all South Koreans will now switch to Linspire.

      Very true. But that doesn't mean it isn't possible for MS to shoot themselves in the foot over this. They might even go so far as to adopt OpenDocument. That'd teach Microsoft :)

      On the other hand, they could ban the sale of windows software and PCs with windows pre-installed until such time as they've had a chance to investigate this piracy business properly. They could give away free linux disks (probably NOT Linspire, I agree) to anyone who wanted them...

      The interesting thing isn't so much the chance of Linspire getting its hands on 5 million. It's more that tjhe Linspire offer establishes a competitive market for this sort of licencing deal. It makes it harder for MS to insist on aritarily high fees or to use those fees as leverage to gain stategic concessions.

      And if nothing else, the Linspire offer makes a pointed reminder that there are alternaitives to Microsoft. And bearing in mind the vigor of Linspire's past attempts to compete with Redmond, that may have been the idea all along...

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    13. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      If Korea switches to Linux they will have a heck of a lot of technologists ready to support Chinese companies when they switch over to their new OS

      True enough. There's also the fact that licencing fees represent money down the drain for nations other than the US. There has to be a lot of political will to establish a self-sustaining userbase for some sort of free OS.

      [O/T: About the sig: have you tried coLinux? DamnSmallLinux on a bootable usbkey? There's an email address on my web page, if you want to talk about it ]

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    14. Re:Nice marketing stunt by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      If they really want Microsoft then they need to negotiate, if they think Microsoft is too big for it's boots then the Government have the option of forcing Microsoft to comply. That's government for you, they do what they want, and if they can't then they change the law to fit.

      In this case Microsoft isn't acting like a terrorist, well unless you mean those terrorists who threaten to run away.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    15. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      If they really want Microsoft then they need to negotiate,

      I never suggested the South Koreans had any need nor any desire to negotiate. It did seem to be the inference you wanted us to draw from your previous post. Assuming you weren't just raising the UK and the IRA in an attempt to derail the discussion of course.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    16. Re:Nice marketing stunt by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I was just pointing out that putting your fingers in your ears and sayling lar,lar,lar I can't hear you isn't the correct way to deal with terrorists or Microsoft or anyone else for that matter.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    17. Re:Nice marketing stunt by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      I don't think anyone, myself included, suggests that, either in the case of terrorist holdiong hostages, or for South Korea with regard to Microsoft.

      I just think that if Koreak decideds to play hardall, MS could lose out here. Big time.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  7. Crippled Linux? by trepidation_i_am · · Score: 2, Funny
    Is that a typo on the head line? Is it suppost to be...

    Linspire will replace crippled Windows with Linux - cheap

    1. Re:Crippled Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the headline is right. Linspire is a crippled Debian with rather more closed-source stuff on top of it than is good for any Linux system. Still, being Debian at heart, it will almost certainly work with any set of {*.dsc, *.diff.gz and *.tar.gz files} you dare chuck at it, even if it isn't that keen on Debian's .debs.

    2. Re:Crippled Linux? by RicktheBrick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Linspire has a service called cnr(click and run). This service costs 49.95 a year. So are they going to charge all the Koreans that fee after the first year? I tried to download BOINC and install it but according to their bulletin boards there is a problem with installing it. It has been 10 months since this program has been released. Wine just went into beta and I am wondering if they will take a year or more to get that version into cnr. They will sell you win4lin for about the same cost as going out and buying a version of windows so they do not have much of an incentive to get the new wine out to its subscribers.

    3. Re:Crippled Linux? by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Funny
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/01/22/register_t ariff/

      Just because it's funny doesn't mean they're joking.

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    4. Re:Crippled Linux? by mrscorpio · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not, just like Windows isn't $200 per license at the corporate high-volume level.

    5. Re:Crippled Linux? by Burz · · Score: 1

      Everything has a "problem with installing it." Welcome to computing.

      OTOH from your message it doesn't sound like you asked for formal support.

  8. Certainly.... by taskforce · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...This is about as close to a Linux port as WoW is gonna get I think...

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:Certainly.... by nath_de · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This would definitly increase the chances for games on Linux:
      • South Koreans game a lot.
      • South Koreans game with PCs (as Consoles where illegal till last year)
      • So they will continue to need current games for the OS they use.
      Sure, the currently installed Windows base won't vanish, but the change would happen when games start to require Vista.
    2. Re:Certainly.... by bugbeak · · Score: 1

      South Koreans game with PCs (as Consoles where illegal till last year)

      On the contrary, in the early-to-mid 90s, consoles were quite popular, even though they were partially rebranded. Samsung and Sega agreed to market the Master System, Genesis and Saturn under the Samsung logo while Hyundai and Nintendo co-branded the GB, GBC and SNES. Sony also released the white PSOne here as well, so illegal wouldn't quite fit.

      Samsung Saturn
      Samsung Master System
      Check the history section

    3. Re:Certainly.... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      start to require Vista

      I think this is a VERY long way off. Remember how games for an extremely long time (hell some still do) say "Requires: Windows 98se, 2000, or XP". I imagine it will be at least a decade before we see many games that won't run on XP, probably longer.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    4. Re:Certainly.... by yatt · · Score: 1

      Games consoles were illegal? Are you sure? When I was there they were selling SNESs in normal highstreet shops. (This was when the SNES was new). I remember this clearly because I was surprised that it was twice the price as it is for a SNES in UK even though they were so much closer to Japan.

    5. Re:Certainly.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the currently installed Windows base won't vanish, but the change would happen when games start to require Vista.

      Vista...sheesh - dotNET!

  9. Support? by mukund · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He's going to provide support for 50 million computers at 10 cents each? Would be quite tough.

    If there is no support involved, I'd like to provide South Korea with Linux for 50 million computers in the form of either CentOS, Fedora or Ubuntu for free and free with "community support".

    What's the deal?

    --
    Banu
    1. Re:Support? by canuck57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He's going to provide support for 50 million computers at 10 cents each?

      Poor journalism, it was for licensing not support.

      Microsoft pulls stunts, why should not Linspire. Who knows, it might work. If it does not it is free publicity.

    2. Re:Support? by swillden · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's going to provide support for 50 million computers at 10 cents each? Would be quite tough.

      Wouldn't be hard at all, if he's just going to match the support Microsoft provides.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Support? by porkThreeWays · · Score: 1

      I think they sat down and did the numbers and decided that the number of users they would actually have to support in practice would be enough to either break even, or be a slight loss (but a enough a gain in popularity that other Asian countries would want in and be good in the long term).

      My opinion on what they should use? Create their own based on Debian or Asianux. Debian is by far the best building block distribution I've seen. Asianux has the lure of having the specific goal to localize to Asia as best possible. China's Red Flag linux is based off this. It becomes a source of national pride.

      --
      If an officer ever threatens to taze you, say you have a pacemaker.
    4. Re:Support? by robotoverflow · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in what cost cutting measures you're implementing to achieve these rock-bottom prices. If I'm not mistaken opting for CentOS over this $0.10 per copy Linspire offer would already represent a savings of 90%.

      --
      % mkdir :
      % ls -dF :
      :/
    5. Re:Support? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      yeah that would be hard /sarcasm

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    6. Re:Support? by Dilaudid · · Score: 1
      He's going to provide support

      He doesn't have to. He's competing with Microsoft, remember?

    7. Re:Support? by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      What fucking community support? You mean "RTFM n00b, code your own fucking fix then, it's OPEN SOURCE, it RULES". I'd rather shoot myself in the head than deal with the OSS community, that's why I switched from *nix to Windows for development. Tired of coding shit, then having a bunch of 14 year old shitheads tell me that it should be for free, yada yada. Then when I needed help on something hearing "RTFM! I don't understand why Linux isn't catching on?"

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    8. Re:Support? by Small_kid · · Score: 1

      hahaha.. "community support." I wonder how many of those community members can speak korean, or even know where korea is on a globe.

    9. Re:Support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir, are a giant prick.

    10. Re:Support? by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't be hard at all, if he's just going to match the support Microsoft provides. I wonder what percentage of "average" computer users have actually called MS for support. I would think that most call their computer makers...

    11. Re:Support? by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      Gloriously so, I fucking pride on being an asshole.

      --
      Slashdot sucks
  10. Most Koreans Websites IE only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Almost any korean website seems to be made for IE, and especially things like clubbox.co.kr, those only work with ActiveX plugins ... doubt koreans are really ready to change their oses ...

    1. Re:Most Koreans Websites IE only by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      True, but that could be esily fixed in a few months. All it would require is there be a link to a page that features instructions on how to change it on your web page. After that, you need it publicized and their own ISPs could do that easily (e.g., you log in and on your user page there's a link on the subject, and also on their support page). Three months, most active sites could change to be more friendly to all browsers, and only unmaintained pages would still be IE only.

      But from what I'm reading from those with first-hand knowledge of South Korea, I doubt this switch will go over. Too bad, although I think Xandros OCE would be a better choice than Linspire for people so accustomed to Windows (free, not stripped down like Linspire, much better compatibility with Debian repositories, etc).

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
    2. Re:Most Koreans Websites IE only by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      IE language plugin...

      Firefox none.

      Score!

  11. In South Korea ... by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... only old people will keep using MS Windows.

  12. What good will that do? by Prophetic_Truth · · Score: 0, Troll

    How will South Korea be able to replace Windows?

    --
    time is a perception of a being's consciousness
    time is your 6th sense, the wierd ones are 7+
  13. ROI by Kroc · · Score: 1

    If this goes through all sorts of new fact bending ROI ads are going to turn up.

  14. Sounds like... by shatteredsilicon · · Score: 1

    ... idle sensationalism to me... But then again, I am known to be cynical...

  15. If you give up Windows... by MisaDaBinksX4evah · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll give you South Korea.

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    Misa no botha with yousa.
  16. hmm?! by akurashy · · Score: 1

    I don't think that will even work, as far as I know korea people like to play a lot, so I doubt they will just drop windows, yet someone should introduce linux to korea :)

    --
    I'm a cookie monster! :o
    1. Re:hmm?! by Mistshadow2k4 · · Score: 1

      From my experience with using both Windows and Linux, I'd have to say that depends on what kinds of games they like. There are more free "little" games for Linux than for Windows out there. Free little games for Windows are really little in comparison to what's available for Linux; most of the games you can get free for Linux would cost at least $15 for a similar game on Windows. But "big" games for Linux are relatively few. In that way, someone who doesn't like to get into big, involved storyline games is better off with Linux than Windows.

      --
      I dream of a better world... one in which chickens can cross roads without their motives being questioned.
  17. Bah by bugbeak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Korea is too tied to MS for anything like this to happen any time soon. Ironically, with the exception of the Xbox, and MS Office, just about everything else Microsoft has a strong grip here. Major websites are designed for IE, Palm is hardly popular, Apple is only used by some 20K people, etc etc etc. There will be repercussions if MS has to back out of the OS market.

    1. Re:Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All very true, Korea is really locked into the MS solutions as of now, but one thing that surprises me all the time about Korea is its ability to go through drastic changes. One storm of change hits, and you don't even remember how things were yesterday. I don't really think it takes a lot to break the MS lock-ins for Koreans. Banking, mini-hompy, those wouldn't be big problems. One problem may remain and it could be a huge problem, unfortunately: Starcraft.

  18. no way this happens until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    they have starcraft for linux

    1. Re:no way this happens until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, StarCraft was the only game I could get running 100% with wine (not counting solitaire and the likes). It was a bit slow (on a PIII 800MHz), but it was playable.

    2. Re:no way this happens until... by samurphy21 · · Score: 1

      As long as you don't want bnet to work.

    3. Re:no way this happens until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux users have their own definition of "100% working", which usually means "50% working if you pull the latest CVS."

    4. Re:no way this happens until... by clayasaurus · · Score: 1

      Starcraft is fully supported by Cedega and runs fine on linux with a tweak or two. I've had my fair share of starcraft on linux : )

    5. Re:no way this happens until... by clayasaurus · · Score: 1

      Bnet works fine, it just isn't pretty.

  19. And in Massachusets.... by jkrise · · Score: 1

    only the blind, deaf and dumb people will be using MS Office!

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  20. That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by RoLi · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Linux needs M-A-R-K-E-T-I-N-G

    Just look at Mozilla and Firefox and you see what a difference a little marketing can make.

    1. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marketing is not the prime cause of Firefox rise. There is a subtle differance between installing, configuring and learning a radically different OS and double clicking on an executable. Marketing alone will not help GNU/Linux to achieve greater acceptance.

    2. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by neillewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd never buy Linspire, but you have to admire the chutzpah. Someone needs to call Microsoft's bluff, even if the reality would be that 90% of S. Korea would rather pirate Windows.

      Ubuntu seem to be successfully marketing their distro at Mac-coveting, Greenpeace-supporting students, we need more of the same. Bring it on...

    3. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mozilla and Firefox didn't have any marketing until their popularity started increasing a lot. Most of it's been word of mouth. The reason that Mozilla & Firefox became successful is that the switch from IE is almost dead easy - interface is the same and sites usually look & work the same way. You can't have that familiartity with a Linux switch - it requires a lot of retraining.

    4. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      Linux Marketing Quiz:

      Name 5 reasons the ordinary PC user would want to use Linux -- that don't involve negative comparisons with Windows, and don't involve Unix oogware such as latex or emacs.

      (...)

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    5. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by ptlis · · Score: 1
      1. Cost.
      2. Freedome (yes, i'm one of those people).
      3. Interoperability - with a GNU/Linux system I know that data I produce today will be just as accessible 10 years down the line thanks to open formats and standards, I cannot say the same for Microsoft's products. Additionally Samba lets me work nicely with Windows shares, Firefox allows me to view webpages written with all but the worst markup and OpenOffice allow me to recover old MSWord documents better than newer versions of MSWord does.
      4. Freedom (again) - I know that with GNU/Linux (specifically my favorite distro, Debian) I'm not locked in a forced upgrade cycle where if I don't fork over the cash for an OS upgrade every five years or so that I can have the latest features/web browser etc.
      5. Warm fuzzy feeling - so shoot me, I couldn't think of a fifth thing :P
      --
      There's mischief and malarkies but no queers or yids or darkies within this bastard's carnival, this vicious cabaret.
    6. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1
      1. It costs $0.
      2. It comes with a fully functional suite of desktop productivity software, also for $0.
      3. You can download more software through the built in package manager at no cost. Ubuntu has 17000+ software packages available.
      4. You can legally share it with your friends.
      5. No vendor lock-in. Linux is supported by numerous different companies and individuals, many of whom offer support at levels up to and including programming new features for any of the standard applications.
      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    7. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      Because we are talking about marketing, Cost is not an argument in Linux's favor. If you look at the distros that actually have marketing and support behind them (RedHat, SUSE), Windows is usually cheaper to buy on the desktop.

      And Firefox and OpenOffice are primarily deployed on Windows -- not an argument in Linux's favor.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    8. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by Risen888 · · Score: 1

      Because we are talking about marketing, Cost is not an argument in Linux's favor. If you look at the distros that actually have marketing and support behind them (RedHat, SUSE), Windows is usually cheaper to buy on the desktop.

      http://www.ubuntulinux.org/

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    9. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by Burz · · Score: 1

      Learn how to install Linux software yourself, then there's no "vendor lock-in" as you mis-characterize CNR.

      IMO its better than expecting Korean teeny-boppers (who have much better things to do with their time) to learn arcane installation techniques in order to play non-free media formats in the varied ways a modern OS does.

      The full Linspire may not be free, but you won't have people pulling their hair out linking rtsp:// type protocols to their browser, and getting threatening warnings from their friends when they ask about installing DVD playback wares. And that doesn't even address browser plugins, a sane working sound system (its not just a choice between oss, alsa, esound and arts...but how they and the apps are configured by default), and the sometimes critical nonfree device drivers. You want Flash? You want Java and Real? How about WMV and QT? How about just encoding MP3s???

      None of them? Then Ubuntu is perfect. Your neighbors will surely be happy to install AND license everything piecemeal. No wait! Give them OpenOffice to access their media... It's "fully functional"! Or just maybe raw Ubuntu is unsuitable for consumers.

      I found a good deal on Linspire, and though I don't use it and much prefer Xandros, I know that any Linux I choose from now on (Ubuntu, MEPIS, etc) I can pull down win32codecs and libdvdcss and still be "licensed". As for integrating that stuff, its still a headache even on Xandros but at least some of the work is already done for me and I'm a grown-up techie who can take care of myself.

      Of course, I do dream of having whole nations clamoring to pay me to personally keep their Linux desktops working and configured. But I doubt they would consider it much better than Windows.

    10. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by koreaman · · Score: 1

      "I won't ... be numbered"

      Oh really, Mr. 772434?

    11. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      "Ubuntu will always be free of charge" ... because they will never run out of VC and their company runs on magic fairy dust. Sucker.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    12. Re:That is EXACTLY what Linux needs by neillewis · · Score: 1
      Name 5 reasons the ordinary PC user would want to use Linux -- that don't involve negative comparisons with Windows, and don't involve Unix oogware such as latex or emacs.

      No viruses or spyware,.

      No licensing worries.

      Comes with free office apps.

      Works just like my web host.

      Choice.

      Frozen Bubble

  21. i rarely do this but... MOD PARENT UP! by koekepeer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    agreed 110%

  22. Re:Opportunistic by Ithika · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "By it very nature, an OS that is user friendly and uniformly installed cannot be Open Source."

    I take it you hold MS Windows to be a user friendly operating system. Sp does that mean if (thought experiment) Windows were to be open-sourced it would suddenly become user-unfriendly?

    Or were you just trolling?

  23. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by empaler · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You surf at -1 for this? Hardly worth the time it takes to skim.

  24. I offer North America free Debian licenses by kinsoa · · Score: 0, Redundant

    to help them to break the Microsoft monopole.

    hope this helps.

  25. The best offer.... by jkrise · · Score: 0, Redundant

    is .... Windows 98 SE plus Cygwin. A Linux box sitting in the corner with all the apps, including the browser. Windows 98 to handle all the driver and user issues. No support required - after all, what support does MS offer for any of it's products?

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  26. 5 million dollars?! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0, Troll

    Couldn't they just download one copy of a real distro and let everyone have it for free?!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  27. Just this?!! by linumax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would be around 10 cents / person. 'South Korea could save around a quarter of a billion dollars.

    Right, and how much would be the cost of Win->Lin transition? Training thousands of people? Porting millions of lines of code? Translating all the stuff? and so forth. Whoever told this must take a look my signature!

    1. Re:Just this?!! by carsamba · · Score: 1

      They already have their own localized distro..

    2. Re:Just this?!! by l33t+'O' · · Score: 1

      finally a comment that makes sense. All the otha posted msgs dnt take n2 account da costs dat could be incurred 4rm making da whole of S.Korea switch n OS. this aint like sum kid prefering n X-Box over a PS2. the costs in training & evrything els will b 2much. so dont xpect n abrupt change. Atleast allow it sumtym...

      *sigh*

      mission completed...

    3. Re:Just this?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's not really a problem when you're talking about a government - sure they'd be spending money but they'd also be reducing unemployment, improving their economy and technical base, and gaining political capital (assuming it goes well). Spending money within the country is much better than spending it importing software.

      The task of porting *everything* would be very daunting, but I don't think they're going to throw out existing Windows installs, just stop new copies being imported.

    4. Re:Just this?!! by madtinkerer · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the Korean alphabet can't distinguish between R and L, so imagine the headaches of half the population spelling it Rindows, while the other half calls it Lindows.

    5. Re:Just this?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you had to say something, eh?

  28. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by sonamchauhan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    not true actually...

  29. Old people using Windows - Koreans love MS by palladio · · Score: 1

    ... only old people will keep using MS Windows.
    Yeah but, S. Korea is the worlds 2nd oldest society now. And getting older. Planned parenthood here in S. Korea actually ENCOURAGES having more children. Also the number one application here is probably Starcraft, doesn't that require windows? They love MS here, I have only met one person who knew what linux is.

  30. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by Hakubi_Washu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I had a laugh, makes it worth to me :-)

  31. I thought monopolies were bad? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

    Or does hatred of all things Microsoft trump this forum's hatred of monopolies and for-profit activities? Because as we all know, Linspire is making a money grab - they are not doing it to "further the cause". Seriously, do we really want governments mandating the use of a particular OS? That *cannot* be a good thing. I can't help but wonder how much howling would there be in these parts if the headline read:

    Microsoft CEO, Steve Balmer, just offered to license every computer in the country with Windows ...

    Besides, as someone else on this board mentioned, PC gaming is really big in S Korea, so it's all just idle chatter anyhow.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by Stumbles · · Score: 1

      Well sure Linspire is making a money grab and I don't hold that against them. But don't you think Microsoft is attempting the same thing with their threats? Sauce for the gander I say.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    2. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      I don't see how threatening to pull Windows from S Korea is a "money grab". If you recall the genesis of this was S. Korea posturing that they wanted their own special version of Windows (no doubt to protect some local companies who compete with some built-in components of Windows). Of course there are financial implications to Microsoft - which is why they said they *might* have to withdraw from S Korea if the demands were too expensive (or time-consuming) for them to meet.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    3. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by nagora · · Score: 1
      Seriously, do we really want governments mandating the use of a particular OS? That *cannot* be a good thing.

      I agree, but there is a wider picture. If the givernment mandates Linspire that's bad, but mandating Linux - with Lindows being the initial distro of choice would be a much more positive thing.

      There is an important difference between mandating "Windows" and "Linux". In the first case you are supporting a, third-rate, monopoly OS. In the second you are supporting a large number of competing supplers. There is still an issue even so, but the second is by far the better option in terms of value and long-term security of investment.

      Windows has to have special rules applied to it anyway since, as you said, it is capable of wiping out competing products simply by supplying a - usually un-debugged and crappy - service or application as a bundle with the OS. WMP is the classic example of this: utter shite but a massive power in the market place because it rides on the coat-tails of Windows itself which, of course, only got where it is today by riding on the coat-tails of DOS, which rode on the coat-tails of the IBM-PC. Microsoft have almost no experience of competing on quality, the best they have been able to do is buy it in, as they did with Office, and then screw it up over a period of exposure to their hopeless programmers.

      If Windows was competing on quality there would be no need to mandate anything, since MS would long since have ceased to exist.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    4. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ahh, we have stumbled across my favorite discussion.

      ... because it rides on the coat-tails of Windows itself which, of course, only got where it is today by riding on the coat-tails of DOS, which rode on the coat-tails of the IBM-PC

      You see, having lived through the whole PC revolution, I contend that MS did not hitch a ride on the coat-tails of the IBM-PC. In fact in my view it is the other way around -- they drove the bus! Until MS came along the pattern was for hardware vendors to also sell you their OS. Everything was closed. Even Apple (a darling of this forum) was closed (and still is). It's "us or the highway" was what all the hardware vendors declared. As it turns out, though, IBM screwed up by outsourcing their OS and not demanding an exclusive (I'm sure they would do it differently if they could have a "do-over"). Gates was no dummy. He developed versions of MSDOS independent of IBM, which ran on IBM machines. And yes, MS got a bit lucky when clones emerged, though frankly if they hadn't have secured rights to sell MSDOS to those clone manufacturers then it would have been much more difficult for them (the cloners) to achieve compatibility. They would have had to "clean room develop" an OS, which is significantly more difficult than clean-rooming a BIOS (which was hard in itself). [note: why is that? it's because a BIOS is a middle layer which is pinned from both ends, an OS is only pinned from the bottom unless you can get your hands on every application ever written to test compatibility at the top] So basically it was MS that broke the hardware vendor's lock on operating systems. This led to competition in the hardware world, which led to cheap hardware. All of that led to Microsoft's hard-won dominance in the marketplace in a self-perpetuating spiral. One more note, by insisting on binary compatibility, MS has managed to maintain their dominance (and at the same time fostered the cheap hardware revolution) all the way to today. Intel/AMD were forced to keep binary compatibility (come out with a new chip that wouldn't run Windows? preposterous), which again led to much competition in the processor world, which led to amazing performance at ever cheaper prices. Counter-examples: Sun SPARC, Intel Itanium, IBM PowerPCs (used by Apple). None of these processors had binary compatibity with another vendor's parts and, surprise of surprises, they are all fading away. You can say all you want about MS business practices, and the quality, security and stability problems with their software, but you cannot deny their significant role in laying the foundations for cheap, compatible hardware which enabled things like FOSS and Linux to emerge.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    5. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      your claim that licensing an operating system is akin to making it mandatory is preposterous.

    6. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by Stumbles · · Score: 1
      Reverse psychology or so Microsoft thinks. Microsoft approaches their product like it is crack or some other highly addictive substance that no one can do without. So in that respect I consider it so.

      Why shouldn't S. Korea want an operating system that "spoke their language"? Or for that matter why is it unreasonable to ask for ODF without the usual monkey shines Billy likes to throw into "standards"? Microsoft has already on several occasion shown they could care less about providing such things, even though "a relatively" large section of their customer based has asked for it.

      While the old saw of it coming down to money is often tossed into the argument. Compared to the huge amount of money and I mean in the billions Billy has handed over to brush numerous lawsuits for infringement and other activities under the rug. What S. Korea is asking for is literally a drop in the bucket.

      Frankly the argument their demands are to expensive or time consuming is the ol' look at the wookie syndrome.

      --
      My karma is not a Chameleon.
    7. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      OK. I agree that licensing isn't the same as mandating. So if Microsoft suggested that the US government pay Microsoft a license fee for every computer in America you would think that was just a great idea?

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    8. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by zlogic · · Score: 1

      >Microsoft CEO, Steve Balmer, just offered to license every computer in the country with Windows ...

      Or otherwise every copy of Windows will turn into a flying killing chair machine.

    9. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
      50% Interesting
      50% Overrated

      It is very sad that someone wasted a mod point to mod this down as overrated. I realize that MS is not popular around here but he makes valid points, if you disagree then respond.

    10. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      If Microsoft offered to license everyone in America for twenty eight million dollars (ten cents per person, same as Linspire's offer) and include complete access to the source code so there would be no question of vendor lockin (same as Linspire's offer), I would applaud.

      The notion that something as essential to a 21st century economy as the operating system of the most common general purpose computers should be the property and trade secret of a single corporation boggles the mind.

    11. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      The notion that something as essential to a 21st century economy as the operating system of the most common general purpose computers should be the property and trade secret of a single corporation boggles the mind.

      Funny, in most places on this board I read that the operating system is becoming irrelevant - browsers will be the *new* operating systems and $oogle will be the dominant company when that happens. How can it be "essential" and irrelevant at the same time?

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    12. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by nagora · · Score: 1
      I think that you have a point about what happened, but it was pure accident, not design and I think that being given a contract to supply IBM with a product that MS didn't actually have counts as more than a "bit" lucky! The breaking of the link was an important development but it was at least as much because IBM goofed and lost control (and, more importantly, gave control to a single supplier) as it was because MS had some great insight.

      One more note, by insisting on binary compatibility, MS has managed to maintain their dominance (and at the same time fostered the cheap hardware revolution) all the way to today.

      It may have been hard-won but not on a technical level. Gates famously hated open-source in the days when there wasn't even a name for it because it was the way everyone worked: you bought a package, you got the source code. Gate's aristocratic background had raised him with a "never share with plebes" mentality and he lobbied hard to change this model and widen the scope of copyright on software - even while admiting that he used stolen source code to learn how "great programmers do it". Once copyright laws were changed and the no-source model established, binary compatibility - and chip design stagnation - was built into the market since users could no longer compile, and thus port, their applications. This is why MS was able to hold back computing by at least a decade and we're all excited because AMD make chips which are only half as out of date as Intel.

      Going back to that "hard won" point again, it's hard to see where the difficulty was when you look at Windows 1.0,2.0 and 3.0. In a free market where share was hard won those turkeys would have sunk like a lead balloon on Mars, they were simply shit. Anyone allowed to compete, whether by IBM or Apple's lawsuits, would have wiped the board with MS's laughable efforts. Fortunately for MS, they had the market to themselves and got away with it. So I'm not sure which part was hard. Perhaps counting the money while they laughed was tricky.

      You can say all you want about MS business practises, and the quality, security and stability problems with their software, but you cannot deny their significant role in laying the foundations for cheap, compatible hardware which enabled things like FOSS and Linux to emerge.

      Indeed. If MS had not been standing on the road of development like a 10 mile tailback, Linux would never have happened because we would never have reached the level of frustration that drove its adoption, and FOSS would be a puzzle since no one would have introduced any other model that so handcuffed the user.

      But somehow I don't think that's what you had in mind.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    13. Re:I thought monopolies were bad? by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1
      How can [the operating system] be "essential" and irrelevant at the same time?

      Do you know much about computers? Are you under the impression that the browser can operate the hard drives, collect keystrokes, maintain a clock, drive monitors, maintain a network connection, configure printers, and adjudicate multiple threads and processes? These services and others like them are essential, and are referred to collectively as "the operating system."

      When the operating system is provided by a monopolist under terms of trade secrecy, attaching devices requires the consent of the monopolist; extending the character set to support additional languages requires the consent of the monopilist; fixing security failures requires the consent of the monopolist; correcting programming errors in the operating system's code requires the consent of the monopolist; providing access to the indigent requires the consent of the monopolist; adapting the system for military use requires the consent of the monopolist; ad-hoc usage while recovering from natural disasters (where a particular licensed device may have been destroyed and licensing records lost) requires the consent of the monopolist; etc.

      It is an invitation to failure.


  32. In Korea, Computer = Windows PC with IE by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's my experience, too. Even if they don't require ActiveX, very few Korean websites will actually display properly in another browser - even fewer if you use a pop-up blocker. I don't think that anyone tests on anything else.

    Korean computer culture seems to be even more homogenised than it is in other countries. Everyone uses Windows; everyone's on MSN Messenger; everyone has a Cyworld Mini-hompy[1]. My iBook received interesting responses: those that had heard of Macs thought that they were tools for graphic artists.

    In addition, there's a big limitation in that SEED, a Korean 128-bit encryption system used in online banking since the days of US 40-bit-only export restrictions, is only supported in IE; although there are moves to port it to Firefox, it hasn't been completed yet, as far as I know.

    1. Mini-homepage, a sort of personalised blog/music/photo-sharing site. They are literally miniature, too: even on a large monitor, the 'mini-hompy' is limited to a few hundred pixels in each direction in the centre of the page.

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
    1. Re:In Korea, Computer = Windows PC with IE by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. On the other hand, don't, because my wife sure does after I ditched Windows and got a Mac. Now naver.com doesn't work 100%, mostly due to Windows IE-specific JavaScript. They definitely code to the majority browser; my wife says "why should they bother with web standards if it works for IE and everyone uses IE?" I've also noticed that Koreans must like moving flashing images jumping all around, because their web pages just won't sit still ;)

    2. Re:In Korea, Computer = Windows PC with IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you change the title of your post to something almost exactly the same as the parent? That's bad netiquette. The standard is to only change it when the thread drifts off-topic.

  33. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

    Just what linux needs a bunch of commie supporters, I dont think so.

    That's about the stupidest comment I've read on Slashdot this year. Where are you from, Mars or something??

  34. Where do I send my copy of Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do I send my copy of Windows? Will this deal run on WFW 3.11 or do I need to upgrade first? Can Korea be sent on Greyhound to save money? I'll need to make room in my yard, so I'll be putting my tree fort up on eBay. Dude, this is gonna be an awesome swap . . .

  35. Living in Korea can be frustrating... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things are changing here, but a glacial pace. Cyworld generally works in Firefox now, after it's been around for almost 6 years. I don't think much progress has been made in terms of on-line banking on anything but IE. It would be nice to see Linux/open-source in any form make more inroads here, but it's gonna take a lot of work, and one big push. The one thing is, if it gets anywhere near critical mass, it will be easy, because everybody will want it.

    It does suck, because in some ways South Korea is so far ahead in it's internet implementation, but of course in some ways it's very lacking (PC rooms lacking any sort of security so they all just become zombie boxes as an example). Users here are just like users in North America, download anything and let it run.

    Is there more than one legal copy of Windows in Korea though? It's virtually impossible to find a legal copy at Yongsan...

  36. That will need a lot of putty by mustafap · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many windows do they have in South Korea? I just had seven fitted for 500 quid. I think South Korea is getting a bargin!

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    1. Re:That will need a lot of putty by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

      Why are you restraing squid behind your windows? That is a bit strange isn't it? Oh, wait...you wrote "quid"? What the hell is a quid?

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    2. Re:That will need a lot of putty by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      quid is English slang for pound sterling.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  37. When you have a giant... by DavidNWelton · · Score: 1

    ... especially a friendly open source one, why not stand on his shoulders instead of trying to compete with him? Isn't that the point of all this, to make better technology?

  38. Re:Clown for the press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nobody in Korea wants Linspire.


    I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for your facts. But I suggest you do.*

    *) holding breath for extended periods of time may cause additional brain damage or improvement of human gene pool

  39. Asianux would make more sense by alucinor · · Score: 1

    Turbolinux or Red Flag linux would make more sense. And what would make even more sense would be the government helping to partially fund any local Korean distros that are basing themselves on Asianux (which is turn is based on DCC I believe, so it should be a pretty solid system).

    In general, I hope countries around the world try to move to localized distributors of Linux. This is the real strength of Linux.

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
    1. Re:Asianux would make more sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are several Korean distros available. Why would Koreans use Japanese or Chinese distros? Not suggesting they are in anyway worse, but I would guess Korean distros would have better support in Korean.

  40. Replacement? by cluening · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linspire CEO Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows

    It definitely sounds like an interesting idea, but how is South Korea going to run on my machine? Plus, having the whole country installed on my drive sounds like it will take up a _lot_ of space...

    --
    Posted from the wireless couch.
    1. Re:Replacement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only about 100MB! Koreans are that tiny.

    2. Re:Replacement? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Plus, having the whole country installed on my drive sounds like it will take up a _lot_ of space

      Hard drives are getting pretty huge nowadays, it should fit no problem.
      Hell, AOL sent me The Internet on a 3.5 inch floppy.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  41. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by Ireneo+Funes · · Score: 1

    GP would be stupid enough it the article had anything to do with North Korea, but being that it's about Linspire's offer to SOUTH Korea's government just makes it ridiculous.
    And I thought /. was a safe haven from redneckry...

    --
    Three tings I hate about stars: -Wars -Treks -Gates
  42. Generous Offer by toupsie · · Score: 4, Funny
    Linspire CEO Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows

    That is one generous offer by the Linspire CEO. I give up Windows and he will give me South Korea? I would take him up on the offer but I would be kind of nervous about North Korea blowing it up. Plus Windows probably has a lower cost of operation than entire country of South Korea.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Generous Offer by archevis · · Score: 1

      > Plus Windows probably has a lower cost of > operation than entire country of South Korea. Wait a minute, let me guess: "Just kidding!", right?

  43. Free as in beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only $5 million dollars? Beer has never been cheaper!

  44. clarification by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

    More importantly, however, it would break South Korea loose from the monopolistic grasp of Microsoft, which the country currently finds itself under

    if there is another product for sale (linspire) then MS does not have a monopoly.

    1. Re:clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not entirely true, actually. In any situation where a single competitor has greater market share than all other competitors put together, that competitor can be said to have an effective monopoly.

    2. Re:clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if there is another product for sale (linspire) then MS does not have a monopoly.

      Ouch. No, that isn't just wrong, it's horribly wrong.

      Leaving aside quibbles about exact market shares for technical economic or legal definitions, substitutes exist for almost all products. The relevant issue is barriers to switching to substitues, not whether the substitutes exist.

      If I'm the sole supplier of gas for heating systems in your area then I have a monopoly. Sure, you can rip out your gas boiler and fit an oil fired one or an elecrical system but that doesn't change the fact that I have a monopoly. You can't just switch directly to another supplier - you have to go through a costly transition.

      Same if I'm the only phone service provider. Sure, you can use postal service instead or carrier pigeons but that doesn't mean I don't have a monopoly. Substitutes almost always exist for any goods or services.

      Microsoft undoubtedly has a monopoly on supply of Windows. That's the whole point of copyright law. Similarly Apple have a monopoly on MacOS. The important questions are how easy it is to switch to different products (not whether it's possible, of course it is, what are the effective barriers - you'd have to be a fool to deny that there are many) and how much market power that gives them and whether they abuse that power.

      Denying that they have a monopply isn't just wrong. It's silly.

    3. Re:clarification by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
      So, let me get this straight: Coca Cola has a monopoly on Coca Cola Classic beverages, McDonalds has a monopoly on Big Macs, and Starbucks has a monopoly on Mocha Fraps. This doesn't mean that Coca Cola has a monopoly on cola products, McDonalds on hamburgers, or Starbucks on iced coffee drinks, eh? Microsoft might have exclusive control over (legal) copies of Windows, but they aren't the only vendor that sells operating systems for x86 systems, which is what this article is about. If the argument is that Microsoft is monopolistic because they're the only ones who can sell Windows, then Coca Cola, McDonalds, and Starbucks are also monopolies based on the above products. Far from it: Microsoft has competition from Linspire, and therefore can't be classified as a monopoly in S. Korea.

      Microsoft might be monopolistic and engage in unethical business practices, but that doesn't necessarily make it a monopoly: Linspire is an acceptable substitute for the Windows operating system. As far as I know, Windows doesn't disallow you from formatting your hard drive and installing a competitor, so the definition of Microsoft as a monopoly is only applicable in the sense that they're the only ones who develop, market, and sell Windows.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    4. Re:clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is, indeed, a difference. Just because it isn't black and white doesn't mean it isn't there. Few things in the world represent polar opposites....

      Where can you go to get a Linux preinstall? Does that same manufacturer sell the Linux system (or *gasp* empty system) cheaper or more expensive than the equivalent Windows box? (Hint: 99% of the time, its cheaper to get the Windows box, and wipe it).

      What's the difference in installing Linux on a computer, or starting Windows on a system where it comes preinstalled? Which is easier (apples to oranges, but representative of the market)?

      Microsoft's primary Windows sales come in the form of system pre-installs. Linux doesn't even _exist_ in that area, especially in places where piracy runs rampant. Linux becomes the premium operating system, which doesn't make any sense, because it doesn't cost the manufacturer _anything_ to ship an empty system, and it costs little to image Linux systems.

      Now, you can go to McDonalds. In most areas, _every_ McDonalds is opposite a Burger King, Taco Bell, and Wendies. Not to mention two dozen local places.

      Same with Starbucks.

      Where you can get coca cola, you can get pepsi (either in the same store, or across the street at the another place). This is fundamentally different as to the current Microsoft market dynamic. Now, one might say that there are only a few choices in the cola market. That's true; however, the barriers to entry aren't huge (we just introduced a new energy drink product at a very modest investment), and oligopoly is a substantially different state of affairs than monopoly. That's why we have laws against collusion; to prevent oligopoly situations from approaching monopoly profits.

      The line at which one defines a company as a monopoly is substantially lower than 'the merest possibility of a competitor exists when you hold a bunch of unreasonable assumptions'.

      It's far closer to, 'consumers have little choice in what to purchase within a price range of plus/minus 15% of the 'monopoly' product'.

      If the argument is that Microsoft is monopolistic because they're the only ones who can sell Windows

      This is misleading. Microsoft is a monopoly because they are the only ones who can enter into the various distributions channels of products termed 'operating systems' without incurring unreasonable economic burdens.

      Yes, this is why phone companies, cable companies and electric companies are monpolies too. Only "building a new electrical system" falls into the category of legitimate barriers to entry, and "bundling, predatory OEM contracts, and malicious breakage of competitors reverse engineering" fall into the category of illegitimate barries to entry.

      The term 'monopoly' is an economic term. Economics is not, and never will be, a black and white system. At any given point one can quibble and say Corporate X is not a monopoly. Nearly anything can be done without; substitutes exist for everything at all levels.

      It is far more important to evalute the market's barriers to entry versus what they would be in an ideal situation.

      Why is that? Why does it matter that Microsoft is a monopoly? Well, one of the reasons is because a primary tools used in the generation of Microsoft's wealth is copyright. Copyright is not a God Given Right (TM). Copyright is a limited monopoly established on a work, by Congress, in order to promote the arts, sciences, and economy. If an entity misuses this government GRANT, and artificially damages the market, the government needs to step in a correct it.

      Ironically, this does not conflict with the libertarian viewpoint. One must first acknowledge that copyright is not a God Given Right (TM). It is something established by the government, and as such, it deserves constant review. From the Libertarian perspective, copyright, as a government 'project', should represent artifical selecting by government in the market, and as such, should require significant supervision.

      A libertarian governmen

    5. Re:clarification by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      This is WhiteWolf666, reposting logged in (I hope). Slashdot's login system is hopeless broken on my systems. What the hell is going wrong? I keep getting logged out each time I login.

      There is, indeed, a difference. Just because it isn't black and white doesn't mean it isn't there. Few things in the world represent polar opposites....

      Where can you go to get a Linux preinstall? Does that same manufacturer sell the Linux system (or *gasp* empty system) cheaper or more expensive than the equivalent Windows box? (Hint: 99% of the time, its cheaper to get the Windows box, and wipe it).

      What's the difference in installing Linux on a computer, or starting Windows on a system where it comes preinstalled? Which is easier (apples to oranges, but representative of the market)?

      Microsoft's primary Windows sales come in the form of system pre-installs. Linux doesn't even _exist_ in that area, especially in places where piracy runs rampant. Linux becomes the premium operating system, which doesn't make any sense, because it doesn't cost the manufacturer _anything_ to ship an empty system, and it costs little to image Linux systems.

      Now, you can go to McDonalds. In most areas, _every_ McDonalds is opposite a Burger King, Taco Bell, and Wendies. Not to mention two dozen local places.

      Same with Starbucks.

      Where you can get coca cola, you can get pepsi (either in the same store, or across the street at the another place). This is fundamentally different as to the current Microsoft market dynamic. Now, one might say that there are only a few choices in the cola market. That's true; however, the barriers to entry aren't huge (we just introduced a new energy drink product at a very modest investment), and oligopoly is a substantially different state of affairs than monopoly. That's why we have laws against collusion; to prevent oligopoly situations from approaching monopoly profits.

      The line at which one defines a company as a monopoly is substantially lower than 'the merest possibility of a competitor exists when you hold a bunch of unreasonable assumptions'.

      It's far closer to, 'consumers have little choice in what to purchase within a price range of plus/minus 15% of the 'monopoly' product'.

      If the argument is that Microsoft is monopolistic because they're the only ones who can sell Windows

      This is misleading. Microsoft is a monopoly because they are the only ones who can enter into the various distributions channels of products termed 'operating systems' without incurring unreasonable economic burdens.

      Yes, this is why phone companies, cable companies and electric companies are monpolies too. Only "building a new electrical system" falls into the category of legitimate barriers to entry, and "bundling, predatory OEM contracts, and malicious breakage of competitors reverse engineering" fall into the category of illegitimate barries to entry.

      The term 'monopoly' is an economic term. Economics is not, and never will be, a black and white system. At any given point one can quibble and say Corporate X is not a monopoly. Nearly anything can be done without; substitutes exist for everything at all levels.

      It is far more important to evalute the market's barriers to entry versus what they would be in an ideal situation.

      Why is that? Why does it matter that Microsoft is a monopoly? Well, one of the reasons is because a primary tools used in the generation of Microsoft's wealth is copyright. Copyright is not a God Given Right (TM). Copyright is a limited monopoly established on a work, by Congress, in order to promote the arts, sciences, and economy. If an entity misuses this government GRANT, and artificially damages the market, the government needs to step in a correct it.

      Ironically, this does not conflict with the libertarian viewpoint. One must first acknowledge that copyright is not a God Given Right (TM). It is something established by the government, and as such, it deserves constant review. From the Libertarian perspective, co

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    6. Re:clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coca Cola has a monopoly on Coca Cola Classic beverages, McDonalds has a monopoly on Big Macs, and Starbucks has a monopoly on Mocha Fraps. This doesn't mean that Coca Cola has a monopoly on cola products, McDonalds on hamburgers, or Starbucks on iced coffee drinks, eh?

      No, obviously it doesn't. Coca Cola has a very narrow and essentially irrelevant monopoly on products bearing the "Coca Cola" name. Barriers to switching to substitutes are essentially zero. If you've been drinking Coca Cola for the last three years then you can switch to an alternate product without effort. Probably without even being aware that it's happened.

      AS I said, the important issue isn't whether substitutes exist, it's whether there are significant barriers to switching. Not having a momopoly on "all means of heating a home" doesn't mean that a monopoly on gas supply is irrelevant.

      If you have any experience of the real world at all then you will know that there are enormous barriers to switching between operating system products. I'm not saying that this is a problem. I'm not criticising Microsoft. I'm just pointing out that your notion of monopoly is laughably simplistic.

      How many monopolies do you think there have ever been with no subsitutes?

    7. Re:clarification by Zebra_X · · Score: 1

      Where can you go to get a Linux preinstall? Does that same manufacturer sell the Linux system (or *gasp* empty system) cheaper or more expensive than the equivalent Windows box? (Hint: 99% of the time, its cheaper to get the Windows box, and wipe it).

      Hardware and software are not related for the sake of discussion of a software monopoly. There are enough vendors in the market that will sell a machine without an operating system that it is not possible to make a case that MS is monopolizing the hardware distribution channels.

      Linux doesn't even _exist_ in that area, especially in places where piracy runs rampant. Linux becomes the premium operating system, which doesn't make any sense, because it doesn't cost the manufacturer _anything_ to ship an empty system, and it costs little to image Linux systems

      False. Some of Dell's systems now come with no OS option, Linux and Windows for example. Any local shop will install an alterante OS for you. Linuxs' price is high becuase demand (by the market-at-large) is low.

      This is misleading. Microsoft is a monopoly because they are the only ones who can enter into the various distributions channels of products termed 'operating systems' without incurring unreasonable economic burdens.

      There is only *one* ditribution channel that seems to have unreasonable economic burdens, that of the pre-install. The cost to box and ship the software or deliver it on-line is the "same" as any other software vendor. Linspire has already proved this becuase they are offering to license their wares for a scant 5M U.S.

      But make no mistake; Microsoft is a monopoly, and that's been 'proven' in federal court.

      Monopoly on what? On operating systems? Becuase that is what we are talking about. If I recall the orginally anti trust case was brought because microsoft was using their power as the primary desktop OS to stifle competition with other non-os microsoft applications. They were found guilty, and they certainly were.

      We're talking about the OS now - it *is* a different thing. There is nothing at all preventing a user from switching OS's. They have the choice. Not only do they have the choice, but it is rediculosly easy to aquire an alternate OS. Until XP or Vista starts to defend it's installation by refusing to remove itself from the harware upon which it was installed (similar to IE's refusal to fully delete itself) - the reality will be that the OS market is open season for competition.

  45. Free publicity, and not too shabby a deal by pvera · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was a bold move, and it did not cost him a penny to do it. If he pulls it off he'll be 5m ahead of where he is right now, since his market share in ROK is pretty much zero. If he pulls it off he also gets to use it as a precedent to go country-by-country offering blanket licenses, which will make Linspire some good money and will royally piss off Microsoft.

    Regardless of the merits of Lindows v. all the other Linux distributions out there, this is all about marketing, and it was the right thing to do. Microsoft cannot even afford a counter offer, since this will set the same kind of precedent and every government in the world is going to demand a blanket license like that.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  46. Starcraft Windows-only? by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    Nope, installed it on OS 9, and they now even support a Carbonised version: http://www.versiontracker.com/php/search.php?mode= basic&action=search&str=starcraft&plt%5B%5D=macosx &x=18&y=3Starcraft on versiontracker.com.
    Back on topic: is Linspire localised? In all the possible dialects Korea has? That could give them one hell of an advantage.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  47. Linspire is shit by zecg · · Score: 2

    It doesn't come with GCC, you do everything as root and are dependent upon the company for updates. Linspire is horrible shit, it's leeching off the OSS idea while pretending to "promote" it.

    --
    .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    1. Re:Linspire is shit by No2Gates · · Score: 1

      That sounds just like Micro$oft... root... updates...

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    2. Re:Linspire is shit by Just-some-person · · Score: 1

      Not only what you said above, but they automatically install proprietary ATI and nVidia drivers, which assumes everyone has a high-speed Internet connection. Plus, it loads so much shit, it takes about five minutes to boot. Don't forget that CNR thing which is just like yum/apt/ports/portage, but costs $50 US per year to use. That's not gonna make people think GNU/Linux has a chance.

      I had the misfortune of Linspire being my first GNU/Linux (if it even deserves to have "GNU" in it's name with what they've done to it...) Then I switched to Fedora and I'm still loving it.

    3. Re:Linspire is shit by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That's not quite true. Linspire defaults to root, which isn't good, but knowledgable users can create a user account just like in any other Linux.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  48. Interesting for gamers? by Xarius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Korea is largely considered, next to Japan, to be one of the gaming capitols of the world. If they all dump Microsoft I wonder how the game publishing/programming houses will react?

    This could be a good thing.

    --
    C17H21NO4
    1. Re:Interesting for gamers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'capitals'

  49. Not gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm currently studying abroad in South Korea and there's no way Koreans would give up Windows. The whole society LOVES Windows. Internet Explorer and excessive use of Active-X are king. Everybody here has Cyworld (a Myspace type deal) and you can't access about half of its content without using Internet Explorer on Windows. Plus Nespot, the nation's largest free wireless service, requires you to be running a Windows machine to use their client. PC Bangs all use Windows as video gaming is huge here and every game runs off of Windows.

    Hell, almost every machine at Space 9 (a huge technology store) comes with the latest Vista beta installed. It's going to take a lot more than offering Linspire to the whole country to make a switch like that. I agree it's just free marketing.

  50. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by catch23 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well it's better than those capitalist pigs!

  51. Big Mistake. by CDPatten · · Score: 1

    A roll-out that size always has big problems, and the only thing will be remembered by the media is that this linux roll-out had big problems. It would be much smarter to transition little by little. It is good press for Linspire, but thats about it.

    Don't get me wrong, I think it would be great is they did move everything over, for no other reason it would be a great case study for the world. The only problem I see is the speed at which it would be done.

  52. Hancom Linux by skynare · · Score: 0

    http://en.hancom.com/index.html This company already fought against MS Office back in late 90's with their own korean word processor. Now they became a linux company..I think they should fight against MS again.

  53. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Right. It's just what Linux needs, a bunch of kids who work longer hours, hold down 3 jobs, beat us on all our SAT's, and beat us at ping-pong. I loved that S. Korean kid at school, beating him at anything was harder than heck but worth every moment of the effort.

  54. It's a mean game by NickFortune · · Score: 1
    > only the blind, deaf and dumb people will be using MS Office!

    ...especially the Pinball application, one assumes?

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  55. MS Price control... The Company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'm going to roll my own distro, slap a catchy name on it and exist specifically as a service to companies/countries hoping to gain some leverage in dealing with MS.

    1. Announce PCLinucks (Price Control Linux a Canadian Company)
    2. Take money to announce unrealistic Linux support plan to drive down pricing
    3. ???????????
    4. Profit!!!

    I sure hope nobodies doing this yet... Oh wait.

    Crap. Carry on.

  56. Re:Opportunistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily Microsoft doesn't heed to stupid suggestions like making their OS Open Source! It's only the headstrong Linux advocates who come up with ludicrous suggestions.

  57. Re:WHEN WILL KOREANS STOP EATING DOG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gee, i told you i didn't know it was your mutt, how long you gonna hold the grudge?! let it go.

  58. Insightful, not funny by Froobly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is not funny. This is true. You can joke all you want, "Starcraft kekekeke," but it doesn't change the fact that computer games are a major part of life over there, and even after all these years, Starcraft is still king. If Microsoft pulled out of Korea, their popular culture would be sent reeling.

    Well, for about six months. After six months, all the game manufacturers start pushing Linux in a big way, since there's no way any of them would leave Korea of their own free will -- and they sure as hell won't let Microsoft pull them out without a good fight.

    South Korea's got some 17 million PC gamers. How many does America have? If you count consoles, it's probably no contest, but I'm under the impression that PC gaming is a bit of a niche market in the US. I wouldn't be surprised if South Korea has more PC gamers than the entire US, even with only 1/6 the population.

    No, the day Microsoft pulls out of Korea is the day that Blizzard and NC Soft shift focus to Linux. Once that happens, the hardware vendors start writing decent drivers for Linux, and all of a sudden Linux doesn't suck as a gaming platform anymore, and Windows becomes an "also supported" platform.

    This is a bluff, and Microsoft stands to lose a lot from it. They've set the charges and are pushing the plunger from inside the parking garage.

    1. Re:Insightful, not funny by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I presume that nobody is playing starcraft at work. LInux would be suitable for corporations and the govt where in he hand of adults it would be used to try and get stuff done.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Insightful, not funny by Small_kid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps game makers may focus on making games playable in various platforms, or perhaps they would take this opportunity and LEAVE korea since software piracy is pretty bad in korea anyway. I'm not sure exactly how many copies of starcraft are legit or not (not sure if we'll ever know) but as a 4th grader it only took me, what, four days to get a working copy of starcraft. (although it didn't go online... but for LAN parties and stuff, it was fine) Somehow I doubt windows pulling out of korea will make a huge difference in Korea. There's a good handful of intelligent people there that are likely to produce an alternative to giving into microsoft (probably a cracked Windows Vista for illegal distribution) once windows refuses to sell any windows to korea.

    3. Re:Insightful, not funny by Froobly · · Score: 1

      While piracy in general in Korea seems to be on the rise, as of 2003, entertainment software piracy was actually on the decline, at 36% as opposed to 90% in 2000. While that's still pretty obscene, I'm not really sure how that compares to figures in the US. On the other hand, I'm not sure how these numbers were arrived at, or if they have any meaning whatsoever.

      Here's the survey I found on Google:
      http://www.iipa.com/rbc/2004/2004SPEC301KOREA.pdf

      Although it seems pretty bad, if it's such a problem, why haven't the companies pulled out already? That does suggest a strategy for Microsoft, though. Maybe if they rallied a bunch of big-name developers together and threatened jointly, they might have some effect. Microsoft does have a pretty dominant games division, but I wonder just how big those games are in Korea compared to the wares of Blizzard, NC Soft and Nexon.

    4. Re:Insightful, not funny by Small_kid · · Score: 1

      unlikely, since the biggest korean word processor, heun-min-jung-eum, is only built for windows. :/ not sure if there are ANY korean friendly open source word processors, but the *nixes I've tried so far with korea have looked really ugly and were puzzling to figure out.

    5. Re:Insightful, not funny by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      starcraft has run nicely on linux for quite a long time

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:Insightful, not funny by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      South Korea's got some 17 million PC gamers. How many does America have? Unfortunately I don't have the link anymore, but I was reading an article that referenced the work of some researcher guy who said there is something like 5-7 "hardcore" PC gamers, and something like 15-30 million "casual" PC gamers in the US. So at best we have something like ~37 mil, about twice as many as you state you have in S. Korea. If we have 280+ million people total in the US, I think that the percentage of "PC Gamers" here is much smaller.

    7. Re:Insightful, not funny by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Once again. We are not talking about you. We are talking about businesses who are paying for windows and office. They probably don't care so much about ugly especially if it's free.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    8. Re:Insightful, not funny by Small_kid · · Score: 1

      Windows = yes, used by many koreans Office XP = not used as often. You must have forgot or skimmed the part where I mentioned most koreans use hum-min-jung-eum as their korean word processor - an application ONLY built for windows platforms.

    9. Re:Insightful, not funny by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Right just like most people use word, most people use windows etc.

      Of course most people use something other then openoffice. The idea is to reduce reduce those numbers so that eventually most people use open office and linux.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  59. Ubuntu is not free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure they don't charge you for the disks OR the shipping right now, but the reason is that they got some rather sizeable donations from people who want to see just that sort of thing. Hopefully, they can handle a request for 50-million disks (or some not insignificant fraction of that amount), but the only way to be sure is to donate.

  60. Despite being Linspire by ShimmyShimmy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (despite being Linspire)

    I agree you have a point here, but I think if you could move an entire country over to Linus, for even a little while, it would be a huge step in the right direction. Even if it is a terrible distro, I think a lot of people would be willing to switch from Linspire to another Linux distro. The switch from a crappy distro to a good one would certainly be easier than individuals switching from Windows to Linux on their own.

    Hell, maybe everyone will use it and decide to go back. Fine. Just raising awareness is plenty enough. Most people still don't know what Linux is. "Is it like a computer?" "Is it a program or something?" Hell, I would be willing to bet maybe a quarter of computer users don't know what an "Operating System" is, much less know that there even is one that isn't Windows. Giving the average non-technical user the insight that there is a world outside of Microsoft is a step in the right direction, even if the whole plan turns out to be a disaster.

    Next, there are extremely non-technical users. Namely my mom, grandma/grandpa, etc. I'm talking "I don't know, I just click on the e" people. Generally, these people use their computers for email, internet, and maybe instant messaging, but thats about it. Even simple photo editing (I'm talking rotate/crop/save as .jpg) is beyond their realm. All of these users will be more or less indifferent to their operating system as long as it boots up and the internet works.

    Sadly, I think the above-named group represents a LOT of people. Not only will they have simpler problems (could you imagine your grandma complaining that she can't install Mathematica?), but will probably ask friends/family members before hounding support techs.

    Ultimately, Linspire is probably biting off a bit more than it can chew, and will probably have to pay a lot more support dollars than it was planning on, which may prove to be a fatal flaw. On the other hand, maybe it would get some very, very generous government grants?

    The bottom line here is that if they actually pull this off, it'll obviously be a REALLY rocky road for quite some time, but I think it'll be at least feasible. Porting apps (performance-intensive ones that won't run well on WINE or similar) will probably be a disaster for quite some time. But in the long run, it'll probably generate more of a market for Linux apps, which would be huge for the rest of the world.

    Now, we wait and see. Go Roh Moo-hyun.

    --
    Partial Credit: The Engineer's Best friend
    "Well, the bridge didn't fall all the way down!"
  61. Actually why not... by TarrySingh · · Score: 1

    "Microsoft gets tons of media for doing very mediocre things. I don't see why Linspire can't." Amen! PS: Eventually ofcourse we'll roll out Redhat or Asianux.

    --
    Scott McNealy to Michael: "Suck my Sun!" Michael Dell to Scott : "Lick my Dell!"
  62. On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess going from Windows XP to the crappiest linux distro is still an improvement.

  63. C'mon, everybody! Sing along! by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    *vamping* Microsoft goin' down! Down, down, down! Microsoft goin' down! Down, down, down!

  64. Yeahm by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Funny

    The headline currently reads "Linspire CEO Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows" which led me to wonder:

    Is S. Korea Linspire CEO's to offer?
    Is S. Korea a viable alternative to Windows?
    Are there any benchmarks on S. Korea's performance on general desktop tasks?
    Isn't this solution a bit excessive?

  65. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Father Bishop, is that you? I remember your beatings.

  66. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Evidence of a correlation between inability to spell and inability to get laid? :)

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  67. Starcraft by Egregius · · Score: 2, Funny

    But Starcraft runs under WINE, so there's no reason not to switch to Linux!

  68. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tru dat, nigga.

    I miss $699 SCO License fee troll :(.

  69. An el cheapo stunt by FishandChips · · Score: 1

    Isn't this a cheap stunt? It's not as if there's the remotest chance of South Korea accepting the offer. And if they really want Linux, there are plenty of other flavas to choose with no license fees attached at all. I guess I'm just surprised that this guy didn't throw in a bearded lady, a two-headed cow and Rocky the giant raccoon. I guess the South Koreans are too well mannered to have suggested to him where to go.

    After all, Microsoft is a bully. If they are going to beat up a country, it will be an impoverished and obscure one where there is minimal loss involved, not an important one in a part of the world that supplies a large chunk of high tech and helps to underwrite the US budget deficit.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  70. humbug! Free software blows M$ away in Korea. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Oh yes, the famous Microsoft support and dependency. Those have been so wonderful that the South Korean government has been moving to Linux for years. It might be over the stench created when M$ paid Hana twenty million bucks to not develop Korean language programs back in 1998. Let's have a look at what software people are doing for and in Korea:

    The quesion is, can a single company do as much as an entire country can on it's own? I doubt it and so does Microsoft. Why else would they buy off their competition? They should have all confidence they will prevail without such tricks. The trend outlined above indicates they have no such confidence and can't really keep up.

    The screenshots above speak for themselves, even if your browser does not support the characters a default install of Mepis does. The Microsoft programs are unmodified English language programs. Free software has Korean character support and translations that Koreans are giving themselves. It's difficult to see how M$ can maintain dominance without doing more than writing korean language how-to's.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  71. A few thoughts: M$, Apple, IBM, Unix, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure M$ innovated much. Until recently, they took just about all their OS ideas from the original DOS, Apple, and Unix.

    I agree with you though that the Unix guys (Sun, SGI, ...) pretty much shot themselves in the foot, and, for that, only have themselves to blame. I remember wishing in the mid-1990s for just a reasonably-priced Unix workstation that was binary compatible with others. That never came until the nail was already in the commercial Unix coffin. By then, what did I care. Linux proved to be just as powerful, and ran on standard PC hardware.

    Think about this though: The credit of PC binary compatibility should probably go more to IBM than M$. Who standardized the PC to begin with?

    But back to the point. M$ just lucked out (via IBM's standardization/ignorance) to be in the fortunate position of being the de-facto offering on every PC in the world. From that point onward, a company that couldn't even develope its own OS from scratch became the most powerful computer company in the world.

    But, whatever and whatever. All that is done. The question now is what can we as a populace do to protect competition (which is the only thing in the world that can keep a business honest) and the availability of innovative alternatives.

  72. Very nice... by danielk1982 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its a nice publicity stunt by Linspire. But lets be serious here; a 100% to Linux (Linspire) would be devastating for S.Korea (and for Microsoft's image abroad). It won't happen.

    Besides S.Korea has a huge gaming culture and within 12 hours of moving to Linux you would have thousands of teenagers shivering from game withdrawal symptoms.

    Anyway, Microsoft is an easy target to push around and this is another money EU-style money grab. I mean, first it was the media player that was the big problem, and now MSN Messenger (or rather the really crappy Windows Messenger as MSN has to actually be downloaded). I'm still waiting for the SP2 Firewall lawsuit and the Disk Defrag lawsuit. Why not? Its Microsoft after all and, everything is fair game. Ridiculous.

    1. Re:Very nice... by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1
      Besides S.Korea has a huge gaming culture and within 12 hours of moving to Linux you would have thousands of teenagers shivering from game withdrawal symptoms.
      One word: WINE!
    2. Re:Very nice... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Once you get Jets'n'Guns to start, Pontifex to not crash over sound buffer underruns constantly, Simcity 4 Deluxe to start (note: Not just SC4, the deluxe version), and Tropico to run, I'm sold.

      But if you think you can replace Windows with WINE right now, you're deluded. I've got hundreds of PC games going back about 12 years. With programs from before 2000, it's about 50-50 run/won't even start. With more recent stuff, maybe 1 in 4 or 5 will run something resembling correctly. Let's not start about those games that don't like my 'debugger' or have DRM on the CD.

      On a more positive note, Outpost 2 runs nicely, as does 1602 AD and Cyberstorm II.

  73. maybe they need a different master by at_slashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Although the basic GNU/Linux system is free software, most of the GNU/Linux versions now available include a small amount of non-free software--just enough to spoil them as a way to attain freedom. But Linspire is in a class by itself; large and important parts of this system are non-free. No other GNU/Linux distribution has backslided so far away from freedom. Switching from MS Windows to Linspire does not bring you to freedom, it just gets you a different master."
                                            -- Richard Stallman

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    1. Re:maybe they need a different master by TechnologyX · · Score: 0

      OH NOES a software developer that actually wants to make a LIVING OFF SOMETHING. CALL THE FSF!!!!

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    2. Re:maybe they need a different master by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      It is an interesting point for sure, but competition in the OS market is a good thing regardless of how "free" it is. Sometimes you just have to be a pragmatist. I think this was a pretty clever move by Lispire, good job to the marketing dept.

    3. Re:maybe they need a different master by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      "Sometimes you just have to be a pragmatist."
      It's not idealism... to be free it's a very pragmatic thing if you think about it.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  74. Yes, games. by antdude · · Score: 1

    Very popular over there. Unless Linux can get every popular games running NATIVELY, then it is not going to happen.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  75. Microsoft really blew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft threatened to take all their marbles and go home, eh?

    And generated a huge advertising opportunity for a competitor. And showed the entire world that there is a potential replacement and it is a helluva lot cheaper.

    How many self-inflicted foot-wounds can one company take?

  76. Sounds like a fine deal... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Realisticly we'd probably be looking at government and edu pc's replacing Windows, with hobbyists or poor, law abiding citizens maybe using it for the computer basics Linux is perfectly capable of (aside from the already mentioned ActiveX snafu's some would experience). The rest will still be able to A) pirate (like a lot of the rest of the world) or B) purchase abroad.

    Personally, I think its a great idea. I can be used in a lot of places and the real-world $$$ savings would significant. But everyone dumping their gaming/msn client/etc is silly. As I understand internet cafes for gaming (and gaming in general) are quite popular, Linspire won't be a big hit there.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  77. What about by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1

    an SKLinux (South Korean Linux) distro that they can create for their own needs in conjunction with a couple of the leading linux distros? Imagine the forum for SKLinux... What was the population of South Korea now?? I'd go with Slackware (stability) + Debian (security and -a national- apt-get) + Ubuntu (user friendly) + opensuse (user friendly) + Gentoo (for some other reason) + Torvalds (ehue)

    1. Re:What about by towsonu2003 · · Score: 1

      /horriblyofftopic: my first ever post got a 1 (score) *cries*

    2. Re:What about by Bazzalisk · · Score: 1

      Well if you're using anything from Gentoo you'll be using portage (that's all there is to gentoo, realy) - in which case there's no reason to use apt-get

      --
      James P. Barrett
  78. isnt computer gaming a way of life in S. Korea?? by gejoroni · · Score: 2, Informative

    I remember reading articles about the internet cafes and net culture in South Korea (check this out http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/fun.games/10/07/korea .onlinegameaddic.ap/) South Koreans love playing online games. Not for nothing, but at this point, Linux just doesnt have that kind of support for games. This sort of thing would never fly in South Korea.

  79. Blizzard makes linux versions of its games. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they can't ignore korea for starcraft 2.

  80. Re: local jobs by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine that Linspire will be supported by US techs. That's sort of ridiculous, actually, considering the shift from US-based support to foreign even within the US.

    I think that if you follow this through, it will create jobs in S. Korea. Not only will it create support jobs surrounding this OS, but it will create programming jobs to fill the gaps that it currently leaves.

    Presumably they won't hire one tech over here who speaks Korean, but rather they will hire a group over there who know the issues in current Korean computing. This may be way off base, but I can only assume that the standard wage over there is lower than the US or UK/EU and that hiring talented people there would be cheaper and more efficient in terms of language and locality.

  81. Re: support by FlippyTheSkillsaw · · Score: 1

    There is plenty of talent in SK that could be trained to do a lot of the work, a whole hell of a lot cheaper than if you tried to ship techs over to do it or try to support it remotely.

    I imagine that spoken English is fairly common there, but you still create a language barrier if you're trying to do phone support that you wouldn't have if you hired Koreans to do it.

  82. Linspire has the most ambitious translation system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linspire's "IRMA" technology is the most advanced of anything Linux and open source has for translation support and localization. Take a look...

    http://irmateam.org/

    IRMA has hundreds of translators supporting over 60 languages for Linspire, and the best part, all the work is open source and fed back to KDE, etc.

    Linspire is doing A LOT for Linux on the desktop and open source, if you'd just care to pay attention.

    Roger

  83. Why not Unbuntu? Free is cheaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the support that Linspire offers going to even be worth the price? Why not go with a free distro instead and use the 5 million to set up training.

  84. Double edged sword by JPriest · · Score: 1

    Why even bother charging people at all when if they want to install software on it they have to pay for a subscribtion to Click-n-Run. Free as in "pay us monthly to install software that we didn't create". If MS made you pay a free to install things like winamp, firefox, etc. there would be public outcry. I really doubt the people of Korea would be any better off with Linspire.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  85. "Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows" by swelke · · Score: 1

    Ya' know, I wouldn't have thought that South Korea would be an adequate substitute for Windows. I had foolishly assumed that an operating system would be the best alternative. Who knew?

    --
    Have you ever wondered How to Take Over
    1. Re:"Offers S. Korea To Replace Windows" by chawly · · Score: 1

      Beg to differ. I'm sure that South Korea would be an adequate substitute for Windows. In South Korea, only old people use Windows. It's a fact - I read it on Slashdot.

      --
      How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  86. I can see the headline now by Yankel · · Score: 1

    Headline: Windows has a lower TCO than S. Korea

    CmdrTaco says "Finally, a Gartner report that I can believe."

    --
    --- Dan
  87. You are complaining about 10 cents? Time = money by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
    Do you all think everyone in Korea is an unemployed/minimum wage Über geek with too much time on their hands?

    How much time does it take to hunt down all the software, check for dependancies and install via the command line? How much time would it take for a non-geek? How much is your time worth? How much is the time of someone with a high paying business man worth?

    Was hunting down the software yourself really cheaper? Even if you discount your time to be worthless, how much did it cost you in terms of electricity and wear on your machine? I would guess that it cost a great deal more.

    This is even more ridiculous than some cheapskate spending money on gas to drive around town to save a few cents on vegetables while using up many dollars worth of gas.

    Some of you people need to learn the difference between price (how much something costs) and value (what something is worth in terms time and productivity/enjoyment). I'm a mac user because I feel it is worth paying money for things that save me valuable free time. Nothing is truly "free" as in beer. You either have to spend money or give up more of your time. Which you choose depends on which you value more.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  88. Is the universe a gamer-o-centric place?! :cranky: by gr8dude · · Score: 1

    We got a lot of comments about gamers in South Korea, and how 'devastated' they'll feel once Windows is gone. My question is - what will really happen? Do you think that if MS really gets outta there, all the existing copies of Windows will automagically vanish too, and all the gamers will suffocate in agony?

    Absolutely not! MS goes, the gamers stay, what's the big deal? Sure, they won't be able to play the newer games... But then, take StarCraft for example - even my grandma's teapot is performant enough to run this one ;-)

    I think that most likely it will become a legal problem:
    - assuming Windows is gone;
    - people stick to it and use pirated copies instead;
    - MS understands that and asks the South Korean government to take measures [if nothing happens, they'll sue the country, whatever..] ... this is obviously not a cheap process.

    So, I think MS will stay, but not because of the gamers, but because the country's leaders are smart enough to figure out what's going to happen after a few moves. It'll be much cheaper to stick to Windows rather than try to go against the flow and support all the consequences.

    Gamers? give me a break. They'll have to grow up one day.

  89. Korea turns to linux? Quite unlikely. by Small_kid · · Score: 1

    :d hmm... from what I remember from a few years back, the main reason why kroeans use computers is: 1.to game 2.to use msn.

    Mind you probably about 3/4 of all personal computers in korea are probably used for gaming, and unfotunately there aren't any incredible nice open source games to play. (comptuer without starcraft/lineage/ragnarok online/couter strike = not a computer to most koreans) -__- sorry Linspire, but it's just not going to happen. ...and gee, even if windows DOES pull out of korea, windows xp is probably not going to become useless for at least another five more years. .. and the korean people will most likely find a way to crack and mass distribute the new windows in that amount of time.

  90. The universal guide to topple an empire: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait for them to piss off enough small people. Sooner or later, the small people will team up against the empire, and before you know it, its all over.

    1: Start Microsoft
    2: Piss off countries, companys, and people.
    3: Sit back while everyone decides to come at you at once.
    4: Implode in your own arrogance.

  91. One monopoly better than another? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'More importantly, however, it would break South Korea loose from the monopolistic grasp of Microsoft'

    And find itself within the monopolistic grasp of Linspire.

  92. [OT] Re: Your sig by orkysoft · · Score: 1
    --
    Trying to install Linux on a laptop with nocdrom or Ethernet but DLINK usb wi-fi. I NEED HELP!

    A second-hand PCMCIA 10Mbit Ethernet card can be had for just a few bucks. In fact, it'll save you more than its purchase price in aspirin you'd need otherwise! Or how about a USB 5.25" enclosure and an old CD-ROM drive you have lying around? Once you've got a base system installed from floppies (kernel, some tools), you can use both those tools much more easily than the wireless item.

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:[OT] Re: Your sig by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Sorry still a linux noob used it but only installed it from CD... How would the packages get accross? I mean ok I install one of those 1 floppy distros (Does the Kernal even fit on one floppy?) Then put an ubuntu install on my main PC now how am I doing this install over the network to do it in windows I'd need network drivers, a mounting system for the CD image and even then I would be OVERWRITTING THE OPERATING SYSTEM I'm CURRENTLY USING.

      Hmm?

    2. Re:[OT] Re: Your sig by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      As this link confirms, Debian can be installed from a wide variety of media. Check it out. This probably goes for some other distros as well.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  93. Re:Just what linux needs a bunch of commie support by oboreruhito · · Score: 1

    Where are you from, Mars or something??

    Commie-haters can't be from Mars, it's the Red Planet!

    kekekekeke

  94. Richard Miletic, President of ZK Celltest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does anyone know how I can find the outcome of the following case?
    # SAFCO Corp. v. Miletic, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11685 (N.D. Ill. August 9, 1996). Richard Miletic was employed by Safco Corporation (plaintiff) from October 6, 1991 through June 7, 1996. Until May 19, 1994, Miletic worked in the home office of Safco in Chicago, Ill. From May 19, 1994 to June 7, 1996 Miletic (while still employed by Safco) was located in Hong Kong. Thereafter, Miletic purchased a one-third interest in Z.K Celltest, Inc. ("Celltest"), a California corporation. Celltest is a direct competitor of Safco. Plaintiff sued Miletic for trade secret misappropriation and breach of restrictive covenant in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division. Subsequently, the defendants the action to federal court based upon diversity of citizenship. Defendants filed a motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). It was undisputed that venue is proper in either the transferor court (N.D. Illinois) or the transferee court (N.D. California). Applying the 1404(a) standard, the Court noted that the restrictive covenant agreement was executed in Illinois but that much of the evidence relating to Celltest's alleged status as a competitor was in California. On the other hand, much of the information relating to the trade secret misappropriation claim will be located in Illinois. The "convenience of the witness" factor was not given much weight by the Court because testimony can be taken by video depositions. With respect to the convenience of the parties, the Court noted that Plaintiff Safco is a corporation that employs over 200 employees and Celltest is a relatively small corporation that employs only 4 employees. Based on these facts, the Court concluded that the burden would be greater on Celltest to litigate in the Northern District of Illinois rather than vice versa. The Court acknowledged that the Northern District of Illinois would be more familiar with Illinois Law; the Northern District of California with California Law. The final argument was "judicial economy." The Northern District of Illinois had already dismissed the corporate defendant, Celltest, for lack of personal jurisdiction. Therefore, if the case were litigated in the Northern District of California, both of these defendants could be litigated in a single cause of action." Motion to transfer venue to the Northern District of Illinois granted.MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE IN TRADE SECRET MISAPPROPRIATION CASE GRANTED.
  95. I've got a better deal by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Give me $3m and install Debian.

  96. a chance, maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Blizzard can be convinced to make a Linux version of Starcraft.

  97. Re:You are complaining about 10 cents? Time = mone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always laugh at these comments. How much time does it take to install anything you want on Linux? About the time it takes to type "yum", "apt-get", or "urpmi." And resolving dependencies? pfft. We haven't done that in years.

  98. Re:humbug! Free software blows M$ away in Korea. by Shaklee39 · · Score: 1

    You know that using 'M$' completely discredits everything you have to say, right?

  99. Re:WHEN WILL KOREANS STOP EATING DOG? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    Scared?

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  100. Linspire, trying to be like Microsoft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me tell you about Linspire wanting to be where Microsoft is. In fact any Linux vendor wants to be where Microsoft is right now.

    This isn't about trying to free the world of Microsoft, this is one company who has a linux distro trying
    to be in Microsoft's place and taking advantage of a situation. Most people on here think Linux is about freeing the world of dictatorship as
    they don't have freedom of speech on windows (f*cked up as that sounds), it's all about trying to be in
    Microsoft's shoes and doing anything to make that happen.

    That is why I think the entire promise behind linux is bullsh*t. Sorry fans of linux, the truth is the truth.
    You have ruined open source and you have have been the cancer of political crap that has left it's raw sewage in
    the wake.

    Open source is nice, but you have killed it and turned it into some stupid political statement. Make better
    software, make innovative Software, don't waste your time on stupid crap like anti-Microsoft stupid political crap.

    There is nothing more anoying than a person who has plenty of talent but wastes it trying to make statements and political crap.
    Do something with your life instead of whining and bitching about Microsoft.

  101. OT: Re:A mixed bag by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

    I also play Animal Crossing (not so secret now, huh) and on December 10th... I may have to buy a DS. I think there are actually a great many adults that do (as you mention, provided no one is looking) :-p

    I also play Puzzle Pirates (ahoy!) :-D

    Now, to re-establish my Y-chromosome, I also love GTA and Dawn of War! (and Zeldas, and Final Fantasies, and Castlevanias, and Onimushas, and Quakes, and Half-lifes, and and and...). Er, please to note that there's no reason that ladies can't love these same games (when they aren't playing Diner Dash, haha).

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  102. Re:You are complaining about 10 cents? Time = mone by chawly · · Score: 1

    You really should take the time to find out something about the subject of your post before submitting it here. Time is in fact money - we need people who post content which is up-to-date. Sorry to have to say it, but I think you'd better go and play in the sand-box with the others. Have a good day anyhow.

    --
    How many beans make five, anyhow ? ... Charles Walmsley
  103. Re:WHEN WILL KOREANS STOP EATING DOG? by Small_kid · · Score: 1

    Oh shush you, devourer of pigs!!

  104. Re:WHEN WILL KOREANS STOP EATING DOG? by Duhavid · · Score: 1

    Here, piggy piggy piggy, here piggy.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  105. Re:energy is liberated through blasphemy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's the "flamebait" moderator? Someone out there just rates everything flamebait. Sometimes the mods are worse than the trolls. This post has been brought to you by....Anonymous Coward The most popular poster on Slashdot!