Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Army Testing Personal Cooling Suits

DJ BenBen writes to tell us that they Army is currently testing some 500 liquid cooled vests with Humvee crews in Iraq. From the article: "The Humvees with add-on armor were fitted with air conditioners after TARDEC engineers in Warren, Mich., were given the requirement to figure out how Soldiers in armored vehicles could be kept cool under the desert sun. Some of the same engineers had designed the add-on armor kits for the M-998 and M-1025 Humvees in theater. But with the extra armor and doors closed, temperatures inside the vehicles could reportedly reach more than 130 degrees. 'It's like putting somebody in a toaster oven on low heat,' said Charlie Bussee, an engineer at TARDEC."

398 comments

  1. Sounds cool but... by rubberbando · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it such a good idea to 'Slashdot' a MILITARY website?

    Lets hope they don't hit back....

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    1. Re:Sounds cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least our military friends now will not get hot under the collar...

    2. Re:Sounds cool but... by Yartrebo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The army wants all the publicity they can get. It's a public server and its job is to disseminate propaganda that helps them meet their recruitment targets.

    3. Re:Sounds cool but... by cliveholloway · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's OK, it's only "Friendly fire" :)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    4. Re:Sounds cool but... by JambisJubilee · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope the guys in the server room are wearing suits!

    5. Re:Sounds cool but... by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Is it such a good idea to 'Slashdot' a MILITARY website?
      >
      > Lets hope they don't hit back....

      Especially if their sysadmin's wearing one of these watercooling vests. If you thought the Bastard Operator From Hell was bad-ass, you should see him when he's overclocked.

    6. Re:Sounds cool but... by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm. A DoS from the DoD.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
    7. Re:Sounds cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what this topic is getting at. Is this cooling system good or is it whack?

    8. Re:Sounds cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too big a pussy to serve yourself huh?

    9. Re:Sounds cool but... by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      the hell why would they, its publicly available info, if they dint want us to see it, it would be on a uber encrypted server, and the page design would look like the usual crap idiots that know nothing of design turn out (btw its on the regular US army web site, its a publicity stunt press release, to say that they actually care about their soldiers (I'm not saying they dont, but it IS after all, a publicity stunt). this is about an air conditioner, not next-gen thermo-nuclear warheads...

    10. Re:Sounds cool but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tee hee

    11. Re:Sounds cool but... by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hmmm where to start with this AC

      Let me start with the fact you are such a W.I.M.P. that you won't even stand up to your own ideas (AKA: putting your name on your post)

      Or the fact that you have directed your distaste for the Iraq war at completely the wrong people.

      Don't like the war? Do not take it out on the soldiers, sailors, marines, or airmen; we did not ask to go to war, we did not ask to go to Iraq, take it out on the man that gave the order to do it. G.W. should be the brunt of your comments, my brothers in arms and I are just following orders

      We did not swear an oath to bring freedom to the world, we swore an oath to protect the constitution of the United States ageist all enemies foreign and domestic.

      So please, lay off the "sanctioned murders" crap and carry on with your life knowing that you can say that because the blood for my forefathers was shed to insure you have the freedom of speech.

      BTW: you will notice I am willing to take a karma hit for my ideas, AND a lot more too.

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    12. Re:Sounds cool but... by McGiraf · · Score: 1

      flame bait????

      assholes mods the propaganda has got you too!

    13. Re:Sounds cool but... by McGiraf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      well if you enlist in the usa army thinking you're not gonna be used to protect the american corporation's profits by killing innocent people .... you've missed a lot of stuff in the last 60 years ....

    14. Re:Sounds cool but... by Sarisar · · Score: 1

      Isn't that meant to be 'blue on blue' now? And should I be worried being a Brit?

    15. Re:Sounds cool but... by Yartrebo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do wonder what the mods are for? This post wasn't even intended to be controversial. Is it the word propaganda? Anything with spin is propaganda, and virtually all media has some level of spin. The EFF has its anti-software patent propaganda. Smokey Bear (actually, the agency behind it) has its anti-forest fire propaganda. General Motors throws their propaganda all over the place in the form of advertisements, product placement, their annual report, and other forms of marketing. Church sermons and holy books (Bible, Koran, etc.) are propaganda. This post itself is propaganda because I'm trying to advance my views. Whoever rated my post is also engaging in propaganda in their own little way.

      My original post was just trying to say that the military would love a slashdoting because it means that their web site is so successful that they actually ran out of bandwidth or computer resources and that they'd be happy, not upset.

    16. Re:Sounds cool but... by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1


      Hmmm where to start with this AC

      Let me start with the fact you are such a W.I.M.P. that you won't even stand up to your own ideas (AKA: putting your name on your post)

      Or the fact that you have directed your distaste for the Iraq war at completely the wrong people.

      Don't like the war? Do not take it out on the soldiers, sailors, marines, or airmen; we did not ask to go to war, we did not ask to go to Iraq, take it out on the man that gave the order to do it. G.W. should be the brunt of your comments, my brothers in arms and I are just following orders

      We did not swear an oath to bring freedom to the world, we swore an oath to protect the constitution of the United States ageist all enemies foreign and domestic.

      So please, lay off the "sanctioned murders" crap and carry on with your life knowing that you can say that because the blood for my forefathers was shed to insure you have the freedom of speech.

      BTW: you will notice I am willing to take a karma hit for my ideas, AND a lot more too.

      For posting with your real name, for serving your country, and for being a reasonable person on slashdot, I salute you.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    17. Re:Sounds cool but... by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 0

      thank you I try my best

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    18. Re:Sounds cool but... by mtdnelson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or the fact that you have directed your distaste for the Iraq war at completely the wrong people.

      When did the GP mention Iraq?

      Don't like the war? Do not take it out on the soldiers, sailors, marines, or airmen; we did not ask to go to war, we did not ask to go to Iraq, take it out on the man that gave the order to do it. G.W. should be the brunt of your comments, my brothers in arms and I are just following orders

      The "just following orders" line makes no sense. Do you accept no responsibility for your own actions? Did you not choose to sign up? You can't use someone else as an excuse for your actions.

      --
      Michael Nelson
    19. Re:Sounds cool but... by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 1

      When did the GP mention Iraq?

      Your going to look at the GP and not tell me that Iraq is not implied?

      Then you sir need to wake up and read the news.

      The "just following orders" line makes no sense. Do you accept no responsibility for your own actions? Did you not choose to sign up? You can't use someone else as an excuse for your actions.

      when push comes to shove the actions on the battle field, out side the initial order to "take that hill" ect..., are the decisions made at that moment, and are the sole property of the soldier

      I signed up to protect the way of life we have in the USA.

      But the decision to go to war is made way over the common soldiers head. Now if your going to talk about innocent civilians getting caught in the middle of a war, it is an unfortunate consequence of a necessary evil.

      Let's talk about the cost of war
      WW2 body count
      ww1 body count
      Iraq body count

      I would say by those numbers the civilian toll of this war is on a good track, as is the military toll in this war. We have learned for our experiences, we have learned how to reduce the number of civilian causalities by using more precise strikes, and reduce the military casualties by better training and equipment.

      That brings this conversation full circle. This item will help the US soldiers in Iraq stay healthy and in the battle longer, not as much time will be spent in the hospital treating heat stroke and other heat related injuries.

      If you would like to continue this conversation I will be happy to, but this topic dose not need more disruption like this in it. This topic is about the technology of war, not the politics. Feel free to e-mail me I have time this week.

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    20. Re:Sounds cool but... by packman · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, Blair is the BOB (bend-over-bitch) of Bush, I'm in deeper shit, I'm from Belgium... :D

    21. Re:Sounds cool but... by rts008 · · Score: 1

      LOL! Haven't heard about BOFH in a while- imagining BOFH with cooled vest is SCARY! (increased stamina,indurance, etc...!)MuhahaHaHa!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    22. Re:Sounds cool but... by mtdnelson · · Score: 1
      Your going to look at the GP and not tell me that Iraq is not implied?

      Yes, absolutely.

      There is not a single word in the earlier post that would justify the assumption. Think of all the places in the world that the USA military have been involved. He didn't even mention any nationality at all. It seemed to me like a pretty general comment, directed at no-one in particular, explicitly or implicitly.

      Then you sir need to wake up and read the news.

      That's the way. Suggest that I'm ignorant - that'll make more people agree with you. Also, I find that using as many cliches as possible can't fail to impress people. :o)

      Now if your going to talk about innocent civilians getting caught in the middle of a war, it is an unfortunate consequence of a necessary evil.

      Ah, well that's ok then.

      Anyway, I'd love to continue this discussion elsewhere, but it's Christmas Eve in two days, I have to drive hundreds of miles, get two more days work in, buy presents for two families, decorate two houses, and do a lot of other stuff... So Happy Christmas!

      --
      Michael Nelson
    23. Re:Sounds cool but... by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 1

      War is not pretty, and with Iraq on the tip of everybody's mind, most conversations lead there. Just look at this topic, not about the war directly, yet here we are debating the right and wrong of the war. And a blessed Solstice to you as well. Have fun and enjoy your time with family.

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
  2. Holy Pork Fatman! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And exactly why would you ask scientists and engineers in MICHIGAN to test the effect of a DESERT environment? Utah I could understand. Or Nevada. Or Arizona. Or New Mexico. But Michigan?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      At a guess, it's because Michigan is home to most of the US automotive industry and therefore where most of the expertise in mobile air conditioning is likely to be located.

      Believe it or not, sometimes the hubs of research of development are on the supply end rather than the consumer end.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Scutter · · Score: 3, Informative

      And exactly why would you ask scientists and engineers in MICHIGAN to test the effect of a DESERT environment?

      Err...because that's where the automotive engineers are? You do know that the Big Three are based in Detroit, right? And don't forget, Warren used to be home of the 900,000 sq. ft. Warren Tank Plant. General Dynamics Land Systems Division, as well as many other military contractors, are still based there, too.

      Side note: We used to have to use bicycles to get around that place. It was HUGE!

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just more military logic. When I was in the Marine Corps, I spent a month in Wisconsin for cold weather training, only to be sent to Saudi Arabia a month later for Gulf War Senior.
      It makes perfect sense to me!!!

    4. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's not much expertise required in aftermarket automotive air conditioning systems. They're really quite simple systems. You have a grand total of about six or seven significant devices: evaporator, condenser, compressor, dryer, metering/restriction device, pressure and/or temperature sensor, and a clutch on the compressor. You do a little bit of math to find out how big each of these things needs to be and bingo, you've got an AC system. These systems are currently made all over the country and you can do it yourself by mixing and matching parts, using convenient parts you can buy at the local parts house (pep boys, kragen, whatever.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by VegeBrain · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never lived in Michigan with the temperature in the 90s and the humidity in the 90% range. I grew up in Michigan well remember how stuffy it gets with hot humid air blowing off of Lake Michigan.

    6. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by maxume · · Score: 1

      I get that you are kidding. Honestly, I do. That aside, is it porkier to have engineers at an existing facility in Michigan do the tests or to fund a new research facility in Utah to do the tests?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      Err...because that's where the automotive engineers are?

      OK, this is true but besides the where its done how 'bout the why its done? I'm sure these liquid cooled vestes are cool and all (no pun intended), but my Hummer has a cooling system which was very cheap and has been tested by millions of others ahead of me and doesn't require me to wear any extra clothing. Its called air conditioning and it works pretty well. I wonder how many millions tax payers are putting up for this, while the solders are digging through junk yards in Kuwait looking for old A/C units? I think no expense should be spared for the troops, but is there really a need for tons for R&D in how to cool a vehicle? Couldn't this be better spent on...I don't know maybe body armour etc?

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    8. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by everettpf3 · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you read the article you would know that there is an A/C system instaalled, but due to teh extra armour and iraq's weather it isnt enough.

    9. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 1

      Ya got me there ;-) Didn't read the article (/. shocker of the day), sorry. I guess, the armour they are talking about (still haven't read the article) must be body armour. I'd assumed armour on the vehicle (which wouldn't adversly effect the temp inside). I live where the temp is almost always 80-100 and I have to turn down the A/C. So I didn't see the issue. Thanks for pointing it out. I normally read the articles. Sorry ;-)

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    10. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by javairishboy · · Score: 1

      where do you think air-conditioning was invented in the first place? Belfast. Ireland. Cold and miserable enough for you?!

    11. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, screw you pork-boy. Us Michiganians have pretty damn hot summers.

    12. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by jafac · · Score: 1

      That aside, is it porkier to have engineers at an existing facility in Michigan do the tests or to fund a new research facility in Utah to do the tests?

      I forget, is Orrin Hatch (R. Utah) on the appropriations commitee?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They meant "cultural desert". :P

    14. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Power and heat are factors. The electrical system of the Hummer will be taxed with the radios, sat comms, laptops and electrical systems for things like TOW launchers. You idle in 120 degree heat with the AC on, you'll overheat the Hummer.

    15. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by RY · · Score: 1

      Sounds great, but..
      Automotive air conditioners are less efficent in the desert. Dry air conducts less heat than moist air. A condensor system works great in moist areas, but in a humidifing system works better. Swamp coolers work best for cooling in desert heat. swamp coolers are nothing mor than a fan, water pump, water bowl, and something to run the water accros in front of the fan. I don't know how a swamp cooler would work in a humvee bouncing through the desert.

    16. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      The main objection to swamp coolers is that they'd require a lot more water to be carried along with vehicles than is currently called for.

      Right now, if you're calculating what it takes to support a Humvee, you have spare parts, oil, and loads and loads of diesel. Adding another thing to the supply chain is not trivial. If you had water as an input as well, then you'd need to make sure you were bringing a lot more of it along. Every how many miles do you need to have a re-watering stop for the air-conditioners? At what rates do they consume water based on temperature and humidity? Can they use groundwater from rural wells, or does it need to be demineralized or distilled?

      All of that is a lot more difficult than just saying "requires X gallons of #2 Diesel Fuel per unit per mile per hour" and using the existing body of knowledge about automotive air conditioners to calculate the increase in fuel consumption when the A/C is running.

      Also, and I don't know if this was mentioned in the article, but these cooling suits were originally used (IIRC) on helicopters. Apparently the temperatures inside them can get just as beastly, and they either had some kind of chiller system already that could be attached to suits, or were retrofitted with one. I can't find any information on them quickly, but I think I read about it in Discover or one of the other more pedestrian science mags a few years back. Anyway, when you factor this in (obviously evaporative cooling isn't an option in an aircraft -- water is heavy) these suits in vehicles make more sense. They're using existing technology.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    17. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by RY · · Score: 1

      All good points.
      When the cooling may be needed most the water supplys may be limited and needed.
      of course you could piss in the tank in a jam.
      Decreasing the strain on logistics is part of the reason the military went to a single fuel JP-8 for everything.

    18. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by JourneymanMereel · · Score: 1

      Actually, both vehicle armor and body armor effect the temperature. When a standard 1025 or m998 HMMWV is uparmored, the thin (in the case of a 998, cloth) door is replaced with a heavy steel door. All the glass is replaced with thik balistic glass and the windows are MUCH smaller. I actually always found it stange the the uparmored side window that was probably only about 6" by 6" (could be wrong on that... never mesured it) was about twice as thick as the balistic windshield!

      Also, the AC that they're currently putting on uparmored HMMWVs is a bolt-on unit that really doesn't work all that well. The 1114 model (built already uparmored) has air conditioning built into it, but even that doesn't work all that well.

      --
      Life has many choices. Eternity has two. What's yours?
    19. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Great, you can be breathing piss-air. Swamp coolers operate by blowing water through a wetted pad or similar and they scent the air pretty heavily if the water smells like anything. I have water at my place that alternates between smelling like Clear Lake (horrible misnomer there) and smelling like Chlorine. Lovely! Luckily, this is not swamp cooler weather.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that humidity alone affect the type of air conditioning, thus throwing an undue bias in the experiments? Deserts are DRY heat, not humid.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    21. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Humidity only impacts things that require the evaporation of water for cooling. What we consider "Air conditioning" works relevant of humidity, and actually dehumidifies.

      Often in a dry climate you'll see people using evaporative coolers, or "swap coolers", which use the evaporation of water to cool the air passing through mesh thingies. This humidifies the air, and makes it cooler, but only works in dry climates.

      The benefit of this is that it's cheaper, requires less technical expertise to fix problems. Also, dry climates rarely have to worry about unbearable heat while the humidity is high, because if the humidity is high, then it's raining, and if it's raining, the sun isn't out, and if the sun isn't out, then it's cold.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    22. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Exactly my point- thus making Michigan a not-so-reasonable test bed for Iraq....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    23. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      It's not that hard though to set up an enclosed space with desert-like conditions.

      You just have a dehumidifier, and sun lamps. As long as you can get the temp to 100+, and the humidity below 5~10% then you're all good.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    24. Re:Holy Pork Fatman! by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Big Three are based in Detroit

      What are the current rankings worldwide? Is DaimlerChrysler still considered to be an American company?

  3. Just hope they don't use red coolant. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That could be a scare for some troops.

    1. Re:Just hope they don't use red coolant. by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Funny

      S'okay, they've got plenty of coolaid in reserve.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  4. Hot and cold? by Poromenos1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not a doctor, but is it good for soldiers' health to be hot and cold simultaneously? I have heard that having air conditioning and heating on is not healthy, so what about this?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Hot and cold? by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm not a doctor, but is it good for soldiers' health to be hot and cold simultaneously?


      Possibly, but it's got to be better than dying of heatstroke.


      Personally, I'd say being in Iraq is bad for American soldiers' health... but that's just me.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Hot and cold? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense. Also, it's not what's going on here. But, regardless, when you turn on defrost in your vehicle, if you have AC, it turns on. (Some vehicles, like the Mazda Miata, don't turn it on unless the AC button is depressed, but they have a weird control scheme in which AC is not a position, but an option.) The AC is used as a condenser-dryer in order to remove moisture from the defrost air, so the air on the inside of the windshield evaporates quicker.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Hot and cold? by tigerc · · Score: 1

      I think there's some veracity to that statement...apparently Napoleon's troops suffered in their campaign in Russia because of this. During the day, they'd walk around in the bitter cold, where their core temperature was very low. At night, they would huddle around a fire and their core temp would rise. Apparently, because they had such a drastic change in temp, they died at a faster rate. It's better to stay hot or cold all the time than switch between them. At least that's what I remember...can't find the source.

    4. Re:Hot and cold? by Khabok · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd say being in Iraq is bad for American soldiers' health... but that's just me.

      I think our friend's got the better point, though. Imagine being on the ground in Iraq with a resperatory condition or developing circulatory problems. I think the best course would be to use an air-conditioning system only so far as to keep the air inside the vehicle the same temperature as the outside air. Not only is there a health concern, but there's a psychological aspect to jumping out the door to handle a crisis and suddenly being hit with a thirty or fourty degree temperature change.

      The Army website says the airconditioners were effective enough to keep temperatures down to 95 in even the worst conditions, which seems to fit the bill of preventing heat-stroke. Adding the cooling vests to the equation introduces health risks that might take soldiers out of action and/or cause lasting problems, costs money, takes up space in the vehicle, may reduce combat effectiveness in serious crisis situations, and also adds another layer to the uniform. Note that it's underneath the armor vest, which makes the unit very difficult to remove in the field.

      While I do like the idea of getting soldiers out of action, I don't expect that giving them all double pneumonia is really a good way to do it. I move to enlist the nation's supply of Republican Senators in the Marines and see how long they continue to support the war.

    5. Re:Hot and cold? by tancque · · Score: 1

      I know that at thelast summer olympics the dutch field-hockey teams experimented with similar coolsuits too keep players from overheating. I never heard anything about health riscs.

      --
      Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast!
    6. Re:Hot and cold? by winwar · · Score: 1

      "While I do like the idea of getting soldiers out of action, I don't expect that giving them all double pneumonia is really a good way to do it."

      As temperature changes don't cause bacterial or viral illnesses, I don't see the problem.

      I certainly wonder why they just don't put AC in the vehicles that can handle the load. Keep the temperatures reasonable and you will stay acclimated. No other problems. It's not like the enemy is homing in on the heat signatures....

    7. Re:Hot and cold? by Khabok · · Score: 1

      They do, or are in the process of doing so, if you read the link. They seem to think that temperatures "up to 95 degrees" are unnacceptable, however, which is odd seeing as how everybody on foot is that hot or hotter. Thus the vests, which are meant to supplement the AC. In fact, they rely on the vehicle's AC to function, so whatever sollution they employ is going to require installing AC units.

  5. Air Conditioned Bras by tenchiken · · Score: 2, Funny

    I have a lot of friends in Iraq right now and they tell me that the Iraqi's are 100% convienced that the US already has air conditioned boxers, briefs, panties and bras... how else can they move around in that heat!

    1. Re:Air Conditioned Bras by Rxke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is modded funny, but he's not kidding, I remember seeing footage (I think BBC) of a sweaty soldier stepping up to locals (in a friendly town) so they could reach under his flak-jacket and feel for themselves that, no, it is *not* artificially cooled, the guy is *really* wearing all this stuff and feels very hot... The translation (in subtitles) of the locals talking to eachother was things like "oh, that is really hot, how do they manage?... ...that must be hard... " and stuff like that... The soldier commented he constantly heard, via translators, the locals thought they were wearing some cooling gizmo, and he was clearly fed up with it.

  6. Re:Whatever it takes by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

    Oh please. A crass advert wrapped up in sentimental twallop. What the hell has this got to do with "bringing our troops home"?

    --
    -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  7. Reminds me of old Popular Science article by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was a little nipper when the Space Race was in full swing.

    In the early '70s, Popular Science ran an article by a stuff writer who tried out one of the water-cooled undergarments worn by astronauts during "EVA."

    The garment was resembled full-length underwear, laced with yards and yards of plastic tubing. The cooling source was a bag of ice worn on the hip. Kind of like a fanny pack.

    The writer put on the suit, dressed normally, and went for a walk around Manhattan on a stinking hot day. One of the few details I remember: A picture of him loading up the ice bag at a bar.

    1. Re:Reminds me of old Popular Science article by Brigadier · · Score: 1



      not a bad Idea, cool balls feel pretty good. I ride a motorcycle and I always look forward to filling up the tank on a hot day. Because on a fresh tank of gas the tank get real cold, then my balls go from hot and sweaty to cool and comfortable. hheheheh

    2. Re:Reminds me of old Popular Science article by camzmac · · Score: 0

      One of the few details I remember: A picture of him loading up the ice bag at a bar.

      So you're saying he jacked off in an ice bag? OUCH!

      Prime example of "popular science", I guess.

    3. Re:Reminds me of old Popular Science article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really had to reach around for that one.

    4. Re:Reminds me of old Popular Science article by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      This is similar to what a lot of race and rally drivers wear. They call it a 'cool suit' and it goes on under the Nomex. Cooling is handled by an ice water filled cooler behind the seats with a small pump inside to circulate the water.

      Works great.

  8. Below ambient? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watercooling doesn't cool below ambient unless you have something like a peltier on the radiator...

    1. Re:Below ambient? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA much? The suits plug into the Humvee's AC system. Y'know, with a compressor and a heat exchanger and all that.

    2. Re:Below ambient? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you had read the original prospect from Hasbro you'd know that the suits plug into the GI Joe(TM) Desert Warfare(TM) Humvee(TM), which has a reservoir for tap water, keeping it cool for up to five minutes.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  9. Of course, is there any real chance.... by Shining+Celebi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    of them being deployed? Even if all the tests go as planned, what are the chances the government is going buy one for every member of the military in Iraq?

    1. Re:Of course, is there any real chance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the new lean mean fighting machine that is the army - they would only need to order 20,000!

    2. Re:Of course, is there any real chance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually being built upon a previous project for soldiers in HMMWVs. There was an article about new armor for gunners in HMMWVs in the Army Times which was so much heavier and hotter than it required a cooling system similar (my bet would be that its damn near identical) to the one they're testing now.

      While I don't think everyone will be getting these, helping get some tested in field will surely help determine if it would be worthwhile to deploy.

    3. Re:Of course, is there any real chance.... by sglider · · Score: 1

      Yes. The Army uses a 'Rapid Fielding Initiative' to ensure that the soldiers get equipment when we need it, and not the 'years after the fact'. The Army totally changed the way it did business in this war, as opposed to waiting an unbelievably long time for an idea to be implemented, we are seeing ideas implemented within a few months of being tested.

      --
      War isn't about who's right. It's about who's left.
    4. Re:Of course, is there any real chance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Every member" does not need one, because "every member" isn't working from armored trucks without air conditioning.

    5. Re:Of course, is there any real chance.... by chris+macura · · Score: 1

      Assume 5000 a soldier (way too high, economics of scale), assume 100,000 soldiers (not everyone needs one anyway, so too high).

      Cost of production: 500,000,000.

      Monthly cost of iraq war: 7,000,000,000.

      So I don't think it's too much of a stretch that the army would outfit everyone, but it is rather expensive one way or another. In any case, getting this to just a small percent of the soldiers shouldn't be too hard.

  10. Rapid Release System by Kuxman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "A rapid-release system allows Soldiers to quickly disconnect the hoses so they can jump out of the vehicle and keep the vests on."

    Let's just hope that the water circulating through the vest is sucked out by the release system, or else that once-was-cold water is going to turn very hot and very heavy, RSN.

    --
    http://www.asti-usa.com
    1. Re:Rapid Release System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why suck the water out? Just let it run over them so the evaporation keeps them cool a little longer.

    2. Re:Rapid Release System by Baddas · · Score: 1

      Depends on the volume in the vests. With the right kind of microtubules and a high flow rate, you could keep the cooling down to a pound or two of water, which really isn't terribly much when considered next to a 12lb rifle and 20lb armor.

    3. Re:Rapid Release System by notbob · · Score: 0

      hopefully anyone with half a clue building this system would make it so they can access the water like a camel suit and actually drink the water thus replacing the cantine they were already carrying.

      dual use items like this would make great sense

    4. Re:Rapid Release System by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      they say they are putting fungicide in the water.

      i wonder if that would make it unsafe to drink?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    5. Re:Rapid Release System by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      One assumes that there is probably a way to release the valve manually and dump the water from the vest, if it's that hard to get out of. Although on second thought there might not be a way to get the water out, because that would allow air into the system and necessitate a lot more complexity in order to purge the air when it got back into the lines.

      I think the idea is more that if you suddenly think your vehicle is about to get RPGed, that you can get out quickly and not get hung up by the cold-water hose. (So breakaway connectors at some point.) If you're going to be out of the vehicle for a while, you take off the cooling suit and leave it.

      Given that most engagements in Iraq are very quick, lasting only a few minutes, whether the water stays in the vest or not may not be a huge concern. Either you're going to be getting back in the vehicle, or have an opportunity to take the vest off, within a few minutes of having to get out in a hurry.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    6. Re:Rapid Release System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The weight of water is constant, no matter if it's outside or inside the vehicle.

    7. Re:Rapid Release System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The army could indeed save a lot of money by handing out water spray cans to everyone.

  11. Besides... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Besides, it's a waste of money. Just put a forty gallon beer keg in the back of the Humvee, and believe me the desert heat won't be a problem at all.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Besides... by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      that's a great idea, but of course we then still need this system to keep the beer cold.

    2. Re:Besides... by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      I know you mean well... but since beer is a diaretic, you're supposed very vehemently avoid it if you're dehydrated.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    3. Re:Besides... by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Beer isnt always good for health.

      In a certain part of Pakistan, people use a type of Hashish/Bhang/Marijuana/Pot mixed in a drink to be able to withstand the heat (when even in the shadows, the blowing wind just cooks you alive). All the desert colors must look nice in that state. But they'll get back home looking like Iraqis/Pakistanis themselves.

      With such supplements, they wont need recruitment drives. Plenty of volunteers.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  12. Deja Vu by imstanny · · Score: 1
    I definately read this on fark back in august. Old news.

    Not to mention, Helicopter pilots have had this system for a while. Plus it's not that cool; it's not portable.

    1. Re:Deja Vu by twiddlingbits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's old is new again! NASA had it in the 60's. NASCAR drivers had it in the 70's and 80's. It was called the Cool Suit. It ran water in hoses via a small pump thru a cooler full of ice and then thru a vest like garment worn by the driver. Later on they added a fan which blew cool air into the helmet to keep the head cool. Worked great but the extra weight of the ice/water was not very nice. And some of the earlier systems did need ice added if it was really really hot. Temps inside a race car can run 135 and up and for 3-4 hours during a race.

    2. Re:Deja Vu by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder why you wouldn't use dry ice. You'd need a bit of insulation to make sure the water doesn't freeze, but the lower temperature would allow you to get by with much less weight.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    3. Re:Deja Vu by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      I think some teams tried that but since dry ice is really frozen C02 there was the question of how to vent the C02 as it sublimated. There is not a lot of clean air inside a race car so you don't want to add C02 to that. I think they now use a small A/C unit driven off the driveshaft, or just run a stronger battery and use the extra amps for the A/C unit.

    4. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new bioCOOL technology system is actually very coold! When the enviroment (outside or inside) is 150 degrees F the bioCOOL technology unit can be dialed down to ~60 degrees F AND the cold water system is drinkable. The system can control the body temperature and provide cold water to drink. The Vest weighs less than 2 pounds.

  13. Scorpius by numbski · · Score: 3, Funny

    By chance is it made of black snakeskin, cover your head, and keep you cool despite looking really, well hot?

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  14. These Cooling Suits are GREAT!!! by ferrellcat · · Score: 1

    ...of course having to carry around that 4 foot tall bong is a real bitch!

  15. Toasty by Phae · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's like putting somebody in a toaster oven on low heat

    Boy, but you should see them complain when it's on high!

    1. Re:Toasty by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      we did that test, but after 15 minutes on HIGH none of them were complaining. They just smelled like baked ham.

    2. Re:Toasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, fun fact: it's not toaster hot, but the current (?) sauna sitting record is 16 1/4 minutes at 110 C. Yeah, that's above the boiling point of water. Oh, just to make sure it's not a dry heat: "with half a liter of water thrown on the stove every 30 seconds to increase the steaming heat effect."

      http://www.scandinavica.com/culture/sports/sauna.h tm
      http://outside.away.com/outside/features/200503/fi nland-sauna-world-championships_1.html

      Amazing what people will volunteer to do, isn't it?!

    3. Re:Toasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Amazing"? About 10 minutes at 110C is what we do every week. Sure, it's quite a feat, but nothing to be amazed by.

  16. Here's a problem by pummer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure, these vests might work great while in-vehicle. But they're worn under-armor; what happens when a soldier has to exit the vehicle quickly? Sure, the hoses are quick-release, but now he's got yet another layer of clothing on in the desert heat, a layer that probably doesn't help his maneuverability. Perhaps there's a better solution.

    1. Re:Here's a problem by Ztream · · Score: 1

      Stillsuits?

    2. Re:Here's a problem by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, the hoses are quick-release, but now he's got yet another layer of clothing on in the desert heat, a layer that probably doesn't help his maneuverability. Perhaps there's a better solution.

      Ya know, I've been reading Popular Mechanics and I think in the next hundred years we'll see cooling systems mounted directly inside of the vehicles. These systems will cool the air and then blow it onto the vehicle's occupants. Now I don't suggest these are ready for common use yet, but one day it could be very useful for for are troops in such environments.

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    3. Re:Here's a problem by 955301 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What if the coolant was the water in their camel backs? Then plugging into the humvee fills your camelback and circulates coolness into it. Little extra weight, another task off their list (refills of the water supply) and a slight break from the heat.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    4. Re:Here's a problem by vertinox · · Score: 1

      The only reason a soldier is going to be leaving his armored vehicle in a hurry is that it is on fire... And even then I'm sure he is going to enjoy having that extra material covering his body.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    5. Re:Here's a problem by Eil · · Score: 1

      Sure, the hoses are quick-release, but now he's got yet another layer of clothing on in the desert heat, a layer that probably doesn't help his maneuverability. Perhaps there's a better solution.

      Feh! You sir haven't been in the military. I'm an enlisted member of the Air Force and while it's true that the AF is the Disneyland of armed services in many regards, the one thing that you can count on no matter what branch you serve in is that the military doesn't give a flying fuck about comfort in the combat zone.

      Take my unit's chem warfare exercises for example. We are issued thick, hot, dirty, charcoal powder-infested suits that go over our regular uniform. Oversized rubber boots that slip over our already-hefty uniform boots. And a gas mask. The full ensemble results in severely limited movement, vision, and heat dissipation. Now imagine an entire wing trying to do their various jobs (everything from filing papers to avionics maintenance to flying airplanes) in that getup in 90-degree weather.

      It sucks a lot and we'd get pummeled in a second if enemy ground troops attacked, but from a commander's point of view, it's a good thing if most of your unit survives a chemical or biological assault thanks to your foresight.

      Same thing goes for the cooling issue in Humvees. Loss of some mobility in an emergency is a small price to pay for not roasting your guys alive in their vehicles. I could barely stand being inside an aircraft parked on the flightline with doors and windows open on a hot New Mexico day. I can't imagine tooling around Iraq in a 4-wheeled toaster oven.

    6. Re:Here's a problem by biggles7268 · · Score: 1

      you guys still use the old charcoal suits????????

      back in 2000 my unit was testing new suits that didn't weigh nearly as much and didn't turn you black form the charcoal.

    7. Re:Here's a problem by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Water conducts heat approximately 35x better than air. Just to be the drag on your funny comment. They're using water cooling for a very good reason, because it's just more efficient. They aren't about to make the cab airtight.

    8. Re:Here's a problem by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, I've been reading Popular Mechanics and I think in the next hundred years we'll see cooling systems mounted directly inside of the vehicles. These systems will cool the air and then blow it onto the vehicle's occupants. Now I don't suggest these are ready for common use yet, but one day it could be very useful for for are troops in such environments.

      I hate to impinge on your sarcasm, however, they've already mounted AC units on these Humvees. They bring the internal temperature from 130F -> 95F.

      The army has judged 95F to be too hot, anyways. I tend to agree. Even though the locals are used to it, we aren't used to it. Given how much the Humvees cost, an extra $5000 in personal cooling equipment does not seem excessive.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    9. Re:Here's a problem by Oldsmobile · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are correct. They should fill the vehicle with cool flowing water instead!

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    10. Re:Here's a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeping cool while in armor is not just a military problem. Admittedly, the kinds of protection are distinctly different. But an integrated armor with ventilation channels is possible.

    11. Re:Here's a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps there's a better solution.

      Sure is, bring the poor bastards home.

      Iraq always reminds of the Monty Python "Cheese shop" sketch ending "What a sensless waste of human life".

      Thousands and thousands of deaths to prosecute one man, and he is being charged with murdering 150 people. OK, 150 murders sounds really bad, but there are serial killers in the US with close to that number of notches, but nobody bombs upstate New York because of JW Gacey. Wasn't Saddam painted as having murdered thousands upon thousands of people? Weren't we told of thousands of bodies in mass graves? He was the Butcher of Bagdad for fuck sake, but here he is, charged with murdering 150 people. The US murdered that number within the first day of Falluja, so when is General "whoever the fuck is in charge" going to be prosecuted?

      The longer this "war" goes on, the worse it stinks. There is NO reason for ANY foreign troops to be in Iraq. Every reason given to date, has been proven to be total bullshit. Stop focusing on making the troops more comfortable, focus on getting them back home, where they belong. Defending the US. You know, the job they signed up for in the first place.

    12. Re:Here's a problem by xz0565 · · Score: 1

      couldnt they just use ice packs....and have like a box of ice packs which are being constantly cooled and then soldiers can take a couple and then when they have to get of their vehiccle, they just leave them?

    13. Re:Here's a problem by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "I hate to impinge on your sarcasm, however, they've already mounted AC units on these Humvees. They bring the internal temperature from 130F -> 95F."

      Then the AC units are crap. They should use proper ones.

      Given how much the Humvees cost, they should have been capable of supporting better AC units. After all if the US wants to fight wars in all parts of the world, there are very many places with Iraq-like temperatures.

      Overheated soldiers are more likely to hang outside when they don't need to and get killed.

      Overheated soldiers might not think as clearly, shoot the wrong people, etc (face it, being in a bad mood can affect your judgement).

      Once you've been sitting in a nice cool vehicle for a while, you can tolerate higher temperatures for quite a while, and you have better endurance.

      In some sports, many athletes wear some sort of cooling thingy, and then when the time comes, they take it off and then they are able to run fast for significantly longer even in hot weather.

      --
    14. Re:Here's a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a problem with the bioCOOL technologies Vest. The vest weighs less than 2 pounds the special new material is breathable, remains cool for up to 4 hours water absorbent, etc.. The soldier will not know the difference. This will absolutely NOT hurt the soldiers maneuverability as the vest is thinner than a dime.

    15. Re:Here's a problem by Eil · · Score: 1

      You probably mean the J-LIST suits. Understand that we're a reserve unit. :)

      In all likelihood, we would probably be issued J-LIST suits if deploying to a location where chem warfare were a serious possibility, but it wouldn't surprise me if the AF has a huge inventory of these old charcoal jobbies, so that's what we get to train in. (And of course, the fact that we have to train in them at all, multiple times per year, is irritating enough. But that's another story...)

    16. Re:Here's a problem by biggles7268 · · Score: 1

      hehe well i suppose there is no point in ruining the good suits when you have a stockpile of the old ones on hand. I was stationed at 29 Palms, CA and those suits +110 degree heat really really sucks.

    17. Re:Here's a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. This A/C system is crap. I drove through 130 degree temps (Utah) in a Chevy Corsica, and it was like 75 degrees in the car. When it was down to like 115 or 120 out I actually had to turn the A/C down because it was getting too cold in the car. And that was in a 1996 model so R134a instead of Freon, in one of the cheapest cars GM made that year. It's no magic trick, for a larger vehicle you just scale up the compressor and condensor size, and if you want to get fancy throw in some ducting so the back seat gets direct cold air too.

    18. Re:Here's a problem by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      I believe that there is a problem with overheating. The combination of the armor, and poor insulation, and openings in the vehicles spell problems. Remember that the turrent is open, and there's usually someone manning it; this person rarely complains about the heat.

      I didn't think that the AC would be much of a problem on the engines they use, but apparently they are.

      Specifications: http://www.army.mil/fact_files_site/hmmwv/

      Perhaps it has to do with the engine's low horse power output? 160 at 3600 RPM, while an AC unit capable of properly cooling it would require ~8kW, or roughly 10 HP worth?

      Dunno, that's from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_conditioning . I know jack-taco about vehicles.

      I also suspect that the heavier configurations with the AC going full-blast are probably out of spec in extremely hot climates; the vehicle has a lot of heat to dispose of, especially when running at weight capacity, and at high speed, and using water-cooled suits probably results in far more efficent cooling.

      More thoughts: http://www.amgeneral.com/vehicles_hmmwv_models_a2_ components.php

      Horsepower (@3,400 RPM): 160HP (120 KW)

      8 kW, that's 6% of the optimal power output. This probably has a LOT to do with being a low HP high torque diesel engine. Anything they can do to get more efficiency out of the AC is a good thing.

      Now, lets think about real-world power:
      http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1158825/posts
      Just as important as the suspension is the Humvee's lack of muscle. Most of our Humvees here are M998A1s, sporting the GMC 6.2 Diesel engine. This is a diesel boosting an astounding 150 horsepower at 3,600 rpm. Of course, the normal operating range of the Humvee engine is between 1,500 to 2,300 rpm. Without looking at the engine's power curve, I'd suggest that would put the Humvee's usable horsepower somewhere around 90 horsepower.

      10 hp, out of 90 hp? That's crippling.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
  17. The War On Anything Not Earthly by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

    When you think about it, these kinds of thing may very well be the early precursors to the Space Infantry Suits... Soon the US will be declaring war on anything that isn't from earth..

    1. Re:The War On Anything Not Earthly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Soon the US will be declaring war on anything that isn't from earth.. If they come here to threaten our way of life I suppose you are right. I would be honored to have the US lead the way where others have failed, or simply ignored.

      --

      The Best Damn IRC Search Engine

    2. Re:The War On Anything Not Earthly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure whether this is sarcasm or truth, but to feed a troll, if they came here, I doubt there'd be very much we could do to stop them.

    3. Re:The War On Anything Not Earthly by numbski · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you're so worried about. CmdrTaco uses a PowerBook. So do I.

      We're safe. :)

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  18. Re:Whatever it takes by gid13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What it takes to get them home safely: stop declaring war on people. :P

  19. Whoop de doo by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This system has been used even in amateur racing for literally decades. It's called a "coolsuit" and they are neither particularly novel nor expensive. However, I would assume that this system costs a hojillion-billion dollars, because it was "developed" for the military.

    Civilian racing versions usually feature a small pump inside of a water reservoir in an ice cooler. The pump runs off the car's 12VDC system. The rest of the cooler is filled with ice, to keep the water cold.

    You can get one right here for $320 (for a limited time.) Perhaps the military should just buy them from those guys, if they can come up with 40,000 of them or so :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Whoop de doo by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      I would assume that this system costs a hojillion-billion dollars, because it was "developed" for the military. Civilian racing versions usually feature a small pump inside of a water reservoir in an ice cooler. The pump runs off the car's 12VDC system. The rest of the cooler is filled with ice, to keep the water cold. You can get one right here for $320 (for a limited time.) Perhaps the military should just buy them from those guys, if they can come up with 40,000 of them or so :)

      I'm fairly certain the military version will be more sophisticated and not require a cooler full of ice. Ice is generally a difficult thing to find in a combat zone, even one as metropolitan as Iraq.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    2. Re:Whoop de doo by briancnorton · · Score: 1
      I thought the same thing at first, but then I realized that milspec isn't just another word for overpriced. When the military does stuff like this, it has a lot of considerations that you don't think of.

      1) Where would you get ice or dry ice in Iraq?
      2) The one you refer to lasts 2 hours on dry ice for 1 person. Now think 4 people for 10 hours and no dry ice.
      3) Is it light enough that you can get out of it in a firefight and still be mobile enough to survive.
      4) Does it go on top of or below fatigues/armor/etc
      5) Does it affect the ability to drive or navigate or shoot? (condensation?)

      --

      People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    3. Re:Whoop de doo by sco08y · · Score: 1

      This system has been used even in amateur racing for literally decades. It's called a "coolsuit" and they are neither particularly novel nor expensive. However, I would assume that this system costs a hojillion-billion dollars, because it was "developed" for the military.

      The main issue is that the gear has to survive combat. Something as simple as a 3-5 second rush involves repeatedly jumping down into a prone position over whatever happens to be on the ground, rocks, sticks, whatever.

    4. Re:Whoop de doo by core+plexus · · Score: 1
      "Ice is generally a difficult thing to find in a combat zone, even one as metropolitan as Iraq."

      The unit I was formerly with (3rd ACR, Army) has gigantic semi-trailer sized ice making machines. I don't know the exact output for one of these, but it must be in the tons per day.

      The world according to a dog's nose

    5. Re:Whoop de doo by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      2) The one you refer to lasts 2 hours on dry ice for 1 person. Now think 4 people for 10 hours and no dry ice.

      Well that's why mil-spec costs so much. It has to do more.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    6. Re:Whoop de doo by bubjuice · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting ice in the desert. Ice is extremely expensive to make, handle and distribute in a field environment - even in a city like Baghdad. And what do you do when you run out of ice? The system they engineered is integrated with the vehicle. As long as the vehicle runs, the solder stays cool. And that's not water in the tubes, it's coolant, probably propylene glycol that will keep the soldier cool for a while even after being disconnected from the system. Soldiers have very specific needs. Sometimes commercial items ca fill those needs. Obviously, Army engineers didn't think that those items would fulfill the soldier's needs in this case.

    7. Re:Whoop de doo by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      "Ice is generally a difficult thing to find in a combat zone, even one as metropolitan as Iraq."

      The unit I was formerly with (3rd ACR, Army) has gigantic semi-trailer sized ice making machines. I don't know the exact output for one of these, but it must be in the tons per day.

      Well sure, back in the "comforts" of Camp Grit there's PLENTY of ice; but I can say from personal experience* that a cooler full of ice won't last but a couple hours in a hot hum-v.

      *(311thMI BN, 101stAB '87-'91)

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:Whoop de doo by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is for people riding around in humvees. Yes, they may have to get out of the vehicle. However, using COTS components will let you replace them cheaply, which avoids a lot of other problems (bacterial growth, equipment wear, et cetera.) You could carry spares.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  20. Re:Whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What it takes to get them home safely: stop declaring war on people.

    But then there'd be no justification for billions of dollars in defense spending.

  21. Fahrenheit, feh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least have the decency to say that 130 degrees fahrenheit is 54 degrees celsius, ScuttleMonkey...

    1. Re:Fahrenheit, feh... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Yea, not all of us overclockers can remember what temperature our cpu is at.

      ok, actually I get worried when mine hits 50. This actually relieves me abit.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  22. São Paulo summer by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live in São Paulo. In the summer, when it isn't raining (and sometimes even when it is raining) it gets frickin' hot. When I didn't have a car (and for the short time when I had a car without air conditioning) and had to visit customers wearing at least "business casual-plus" clothes and sometimes a suit and tie during the summer, my mind naturally turned to ways to keep myself cool so I wouldn't arrive all sweaty and wrinkled at the customer sites.
    I had the idea of a personal cooling unit, with a box (maybe carried in a briefcase) that would cool some liquid (water maybe) and pump it through tubes that I would be wearing to cool strategic regions of my body (major arteries and possibly veins near the skin seemed like good places to have the tubes passing). I had this amazing mental image of me walking down the Avenida Paulista (a famous major avenue in the city) in the blazing sun on the hottest day of the year, wearing a black wool suit and looking cool and comfortable while people around me in shorts, sleeveless shirts and sandals were panting and bathed in sweat.
    The technical issues seemed tough to master, especially the question of how I would cool the water (or other liquid). Then it occurred to me that I could just have a reservoir filled with as much ice as it could hold, and then cold water filling the remaining space. A simple battery-operated pump would pump the water through aquarium tubing to the aforementioned strategic points and then back to the reservoir for heat exchange with the ice and cooler water. This version would be able to provide cooling for a much shorter time than the one with a portable refrigeration unit, but one could always refill the reservoir with ice and water, and it would be a lot easier to build and maintain. I would be able to build it from readily available (and inexpensive) components. Not to mention that I wouldn't have the problem of powering a portable refrigeration unit. This one seemed doable, but I ended up buying a car with air conditioning before I got around to making my personal cooling unit, and my interest in actually completing the project waned.

    --
    "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    1. Re:São Paulo summer by asternick · · Score: 0

      One would think that in a country that straddles the equator businesses would lighten up on the dress code!

    2. Re:São Paulo summer by 955301 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The personal cooling unit: thermos
      The cooling fluid: icewater
      The deliver: drink it.

      --
      You are checking your backups, aren't you?
    3. Re:São Paulo summer by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      Dude, I understand your pain. Especially today (12/20), since it was freaking hot around 1pm and I got stuck in traffic due to the arrival of the three-times FIFA Club World Champion, São Paulo FC (tricampeão!!! yay!). But you definitely have to try to go in full business attire in downtown Rio. That's the easiest way to die (or commit suicide) from a heatstroke. Maybe your product sells there, or even in Manaus, where the extreme humidity is the issue, then followed by the heat. Who knows?

      Comments on the non-sensical São Paulo weather aside, I still think you'd sweat in your cooling unit (think of having to walk around for some 20 minutes -- your internal temperature increases faster than some equipment could remove heat without causing frostbite). Having "strategic places" (not the groin, I hope) padded with some sort of plastic or metal do not sound that interesting, since sweat evaporation would be blocked. The thermal gear would cause it to condense and you'll end up soaked again. Just IMHO anyway :)

    4. Re:São Paulo summer by wenchmagnet · · Score: 1

      I thought about a design like this too... a surgeon friend of mine was telling me about these honeycomb spongelike pads they have that have water pumped through them that when placed against a patient's body can help regulate temperature.

      I was thinking of designing it for an open jeep... we have HOT summers here and a heated/cooled seat would rock. The only problem is that if you're using this on a humid day and this thing is COLD, you'll get hellish condensation. Sort of like a cold bottle of beer on a hot humid day. You probably dont want to sit in a puddle of water even if its cool. Especially if you're wearing a business suit.

      So after giving it some more though, I figured air-con is much better because the air is also dehumidified while being cooled.

  23. Re:Whatever it takes by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, we don't usually declare wars; we just wage them.

  24. militray spending by minus_273 · · Score: 4, Funny

    military spending is such a waste. I can't remember the last time i used something developed by the military. I think the net would be a better place without this kind of research.

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:militray spending by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      man, thats funny. I wonder how many mods will get it?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:militray spending by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      military spending is such a waste. I can't remember the last time i used something developed by the military.

      um.... what about the Internet? since that came from the ARPAnet (Advanced Research Projects Agency) which was created by Department of Defense (DoD) spending.

    3. Re:militray spending by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Ever use a GPS? Or, for that matter, a road map? Freeways? Potato-chip bags?

      There's others...I'm just too lazy to try to remember them.

    4. Re:militray spending by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Heh. I wonder how many moderators will take you seriously. (sorry to spoil the deadpan)

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    5. Re:militray spending by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      judging from the replies, not too many

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    6. Re:militray spending by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      He forgot to use the tag. Y'know, to clue you into the joke.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    7. Re:militray spending by minus_273 · · Score: 1

      you know, that would require actually knowing the history of the net. :-p

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    8. Re:militray spending by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yea, those slackers. I'm so glad Al Gore invented the internet, just so we can show those lazy military folks how to accomplish something!

    9. Re:militray spending by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Which is why the comment is so damn funny. SHeesh.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    10. Re:militray spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoooosh!

    11. Re:militray spending by La+Fourmi+Nihiliste · · Score: 0, Redundant

      military spending is such a waste. I can't remember the last time i used something developed by the military. I think the net would be a better place without this kind of research.

      you've just posted a comment on the internet, formerly known as arpanet (well a long time ago)... wasnt that a network of computers made for military use???

      though i agree that military spending is a waste, i suggest you reevaluate your use of [INSERT USED OBJECT HERE] for it most probably has some root in military use...

      wether we want it or not, war is a time when people get very inventive and money is rarely a concern, as victory is the only goal... think of all the advances in science that where triggered by war and you will notice how much we owe (in terms of technology) to this barbaric thing we call war.

      ant
    12. Re:militray spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      woooosh

    13. Re:militray spending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c.WWI - Duct tape and Gerry Cans

    14. Re:militray spending by Madcowz · · Score: 1

      I really don't believe that there are so many people who didn't get your humour/sarcasm/irony/joke... call it what you want, it was funny and there are some really stupid people here on /. who shoudln't be allowed near a computer, let alone reading this site.

    15. Re:militray spending by Wocko · · Score: 1

      Score: -1, knucklehead

  25. i don't know by xo0bob0ox · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know if this is such a good idea..when I was in Afghanistan we often were in humvees and they were already crammed as it is. I think anything like this would just add to the chaos that is inside the humvee. Although it is a step in the right direction It just dosn't seem smart. Its hard to get out of a humvee when you plan to, and I can't imagine how bad this might add to any reaction to contact or IED. The Ac in humvees right now is not too bad, its just the fact that it overheats the engine and you end up having to shut it off is what sucks. Then again, its always cool up top on the turret...

    --
    Support Objectivism and the United States,

    Ayn Rand

    1. Re:i don't know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent has it right. The real problem is the fact that the engine overheats with the AC on. I've had vehicles blow engines on a convoy on 130+ degree days, and it sucks. It's enough of a bitch to get a seatbelt over body armor, connecting headsets, other various electronics, (un)locking doors, etc every time you get in and out in combat situations. And it gets a lot hotter than 130 inside an uparmor on hot days - getting out into the 130 degree sun was always a relief.

    2. Re:i don't know by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Is the compressor running directly off the engine? The only reason I can think of for not doing it is a lack of space.

      I know busses have gigantic compressors that run directly off the crankshaft and put out enough BTUs to cool several houses (since Busses don't have insulation)

      Not sure if that would help with overheating.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:i don't know by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Does sound like they're solving the wrong problem. Keeping an engine cool has got to be easier than figuring out how to coil cooling tubes over a bunch of oddly-sized fidgety humans that have to be able to detatch in an instant and still be fully unencumbered after detatching. Less energy efficient, but much simpler-sounding.

    4. Re:i don't know by woolio · · Score: 1
      The Ac in humvees right now is not too bad, its just the fact that it overheats the engine


      The AC causes the engine to overheat? Then the solution is clear...

      I'm sure it won't be long before some genius suggests the use of TWO Air Conditioners... One for inside, one for the engine...

      But kidding aside, are they using house-type central AC's inside those things? Considering the massive engine that must be in those Humvees, I find it extremely odd that the little AC would put a significant load on it... (Or more likely the hot air-exhaust from the AC evaporator is heating the area surrounding the vehicle, which just sounds like poor design and a possible combat disadvantage)...

      How do you drive slowly up a hill, desert sand-dune, etc...? What happens if you have to pull/tow/push another vehicle, etc??? I hope they don't overheat then...

      (Parent can treat these as rhetorical questions...)
    5. Re:i don't know by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the radiator was, frankly speaking, designed for cooler climates and to be moving while under the sort of load the AC places on the engine. If the vehicle isn't moving, it's not getting much circulation around the radiator.

      You could probably fix the problem with a bigger fan for it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  26. Well... by Blue-Footed+Boobie · · Score: 1

    This is interesting, but I will be really excited when we have our own Still-Suits ala Dune. I mean, I would think we have the technology to make still-suits a reality.

    --
    DAMN YOU OCTODOG! DAMN YOU TO HELL!
    1. Re:Well... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Becasue drinking your own sweat is fun!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Well... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      http://technovelgy.com/ct/content.asp?Bnum=42
      It's basically a micro-sandwich; a high-efficiency filter and heat-exchange system. the skin-contact layer is porous. Perspiration passes through it, having cooled the body. Motions of the body, especially breathing, and some osmotic action provide the pumping force. With a Fremen suit in good working order, you won't lose more than a thimbleful of moisture a day - even if you're caught in the Great Erg.
      I thought the entire mechanism behind perspiration was that it cooled you through evaporation. IE water ---> air

      Then again, you aren't really supposed to be traveling around the desert during the daytime, so I imagine it would work just fine at night, since temperatures drop & the heat can radiate away.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Well... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find the recycled sweat to be the MOST palatable of the body's byproducts that stillsuits recycle.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Well... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      when we have our own Still-Suits ala Dune.

      You can count me out. Still-Suits are hot

  27. Re:Whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, but we haven't declared war on anyone since June 5th, 1942. See this wikipedia page for a reference. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_war_by _the_United_States

  28. That's the military for you... by kponto · · Score: 1

    WTF is wrong with air conditioning?


    Seems to me that if they're going to spend all this time adding a liquid cooling system to the vehicle, they could just add some AC device instead.



    k
    --
    This too, will end.
    1. Re:That's the military for you... by Kuxman · · Score: 1

      RTFA:
      "But even with air conditioning, temperatures inside the armored vehicles could still reach 95 degrees in the sun, Bussee said. So something more was needed."

      --
      http://www.asti-usa.com
    2. Re:That's the military for you... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Apparently, the AC in current humvees causes the engine to overheat. (source)

    3. Re:That's the military for you... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      WTF is wrong with air conditioning?

      Car AC generally requires a pretty closed system. Windows up, etc. Your car is OK, but a HUMVEE is not particularly 'closed'. Turret, windows down...all significant air leaks. All the AC unit might be doing it blowing cold air out the windows, without actually cooling the occupants. And HUMVEEs aren't the only vehicles moving.

      If we can cool the guys, instead of the inside of whatever vehicle they are in....one more step to a self contained fighting unit, with a man at the center.

  29. Not that hot... by evilviper · · Score: 1
    But even with air conditioning, temperatures inside the armored vehicles could still reach 95 degrees in the sun, Bussee said. So something more was needed.

    Ummm... This sounds pretty ridiculous to those of us who live in the desert. Around here, when it's 125F degrees in the shade, everyone still works outside, and many in direct sunlight. I *never* even turn on my car's air conditioner (though admitedly, most people do).

    Can someone fill me in as to why Iraq is so different that people can't work in tempuratures even lower than people in So. California/Arizona/Nevada are used-to?
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Not that hot... by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you wear full body armour on top of coveralls and carry 50 pounds of equipment wherever you go on those days? I know I sure as hell wouldn't if I had the choice hehe.

    2. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a) The big thing is that it is 95 degrees in the vehicle WITH THE A/C on! Think about what the temperature has to be outside to do that, and what the temperature in the vehicle would be without A/C.

      b) Most of the people you see working outside near you eventually have access to A/C buildings at some point. I do not think soldiers in Iraq have the same luxury.

      c) Most of the people you see working outside near you are not wearing several layers of long clothing, including unbreathing personal armor.

    3. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone fill me in as to why Iraq is so different that people can't work in tempuratures even lower than people in So. California/Arizona/Nevada are used-to?

      Not everyone who got sent to Iraq is from Nevada, you know. Sure, you can work all day when it's 125 degrees out, but come up north here and shovel my sidewalk sometime. I don't even need a coat; you'll be wishing the military was researching a special suit for you.

    4. Re:Not that hot... by keybordcowboy · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding?

      Iraq is a very hot place. The average high in July in Baghdad is 110. Now include a hot ass uniform, helmet, direct sun, and driving around in a hot vechile that probably has very low air cirulation.

    5. Re:Not that hot... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Can someone fill me in as to why Iraq is so different that people can't work in tempuratures even lower than people in So. California/Arizona/Nevada are used-to?

      The job is what's different: if you're feeling like crap doing your civilian work, you can sit down and stop working or go in the shade. You probably don't even realize the number of times you've been close to a heat injury.

      If you're on a mission, however, you usually can't and if you haven't prepared for it you're going to get a heat injury. Now the mission is compromised, and you have to be medevaced, exposing yourself and others to mortal danger.

    6. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ummm... This sounds pretty ridiculous to those of us who live in the desert. Around here, when it's 125F degrees in the shade, everyone still works outside, and many in direct sunlight. I *never* even turn on my car's air conditioner (though admitedly, most people do).

      Can someone fill me in as to why Iraq is so different that people can't work in tempuratures even lower than people in So. California/Arizona/Nevada are used-to?


      Wear a full set of BDUs, body armor, kevlar helmet, LBE, etc and if you're self-sufficient about sixty pounds of gear on your back along with a weapon and ammo. Now move out with that during the hottest part of the day for a length of time.. say a couple of hours. Bring lots of water!

      I was a young lad stationed at Fort Huachuca, AZ (and have been to Yuma as well) once upon a time and was used to running five to ten miles a couple of days a week during the summer, and the addition of the above gear makes it an ass kicker just to march let alone move out expeditiously. As far as being "used to it", right. We were all young, in shape, and acclimated and it was still hard as hell..
    7. Re:Not that hot... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Do you wear full body armour on top of coveralls and carry 50 pounds of equipment wherever you go on those days?

      "Carrying" is nonsense, because they aren't walking around, this is about while they are seated in a Humvee.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:Not that hot... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      a) The big thing is that it is 95 degrees in the vehicle WITH THE A/C on! Think about what the temperature has to be outside to do that, and what the temperature in the vehicle would be without A/C.

      It would be probably 120 without that, but since they have it, there's no point in talking about if they hypothetically didn't have it. These suits also wouldn't work if they didn't have AC, so there you go.

      b) Most of the people you see working outside near you eventually have access to A/C buildings at some point. I do not think soldiers in Iraq have the same luxury.

      Not really. Work on a construction crew, and you're out in the open 12+ hours/day. And you can believe me, I don't just "see" people working outside, I do so myself. All I need after I'm done is some shade, not air conditioning.

      c) Most of the people you see working outside near you are not wearing several layers of long clothing, including unbreathing personal armor.

      Obviously not the armor, but they do indeed wear long pants, long sleeves, etc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Not that hot... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The job is what's different: if you're feeling like crap doing your civilian work, you can sit down and stop working or go in the shade.

      Have you ever had a blue-collar job? You certainly won't keep the job long if you're taking unscheduled breaks.

      You probably don't even realize the number of times you've been close to a heat injury.

      I know all the symptoms of heat exhaustion and heat stroke. I've never had anything more than the beginning symptoms of heat exhaution, which is minor at it's worst, and I've certainly never come even remotely close to heat stroke.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:Not that hot... by RY · · Score: 1

      "Carrying" is nonsense, because they aren't walking around, this is about while they are seated in a Humvee.

      Just wearing bodyarmor stops all the natural cooling the body normaly does.
      The vest covers the largest cooling area of the body. The helments keep heat in better than a winter cap.

      Try wearing a plastic trash bag under your shirt and a rain hat while working on a hot day. You will see how much natural cooling is stopped by the nessessarly improperly dressing.

    11. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Obviously not the armor, but they do indeed wear long pants, long sleeves, etc.

      There's a big fucking difference between long pants and long sleeves and the reinforced BDU uniform (there are double layers in heavy wear areas), kevlar helmet, body armor, then anywhere from 45-75 lbs of additional equipment on your body EVERYWHERE you go.

    12. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why bycicle helmets are different from ski halmets - they have a lot of ventilation. Why is it a problem to mandate CEO of the company that sell you these helmets together with your graft agent who buys it for you to drive in their product for a while in Irak?

    13. Re:Not that hot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. You work under harder conditions than soliders face in Iraq and you're tougher than the average soldier. Hooray for you.

  30. Typical America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. Army spends thousands of dollars to develop Personal Cooling suits. The Russian Army wears T-Shirts.

  31. Peltier Cooler? by Caydel · · Score: 1

    It coud be done with just a racing 'coolsuit'. Plus. extra geek points if instead of a large cooler of ice, you get a small cooler with a Peltier device! http://www.hackaday.com/entry/1234000083048949/

    1. Re:Peltier Cooler? by v1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Peltiers are nice in theory but they have one major drawback not many know about. They are not efficient. I have a development peltier here (1" x 1", 128 junctions, 12v) and it will condense water on the cold side almost instantly. BUT... on the hot side, I have a heat sink and it's pumping out lots of heat - a lot more than what's being pulled from the cold side. It draws about 2 amps at 12v, so it's dissipating about 25 watts of heat in addition to what's being pumped from the cold side.

      So peltiers actually work to generate heat in your vicinity, and have to be kept cooled. This peltier will try to hold about a 45 degree temp difference between the hot and cold side. So if the hot side heats up to say, 95 degrees due to inefficiency, it can only drop the cold side down to 50 degrees.

      I've also heard people comment about "stacking" peltiers, to increase the cooling. (temp differential) This is great if they are not each producing 25 watts of heat. If you have two of them stacked, the "downwind" peltier is having to dump what... 35 or so watts of heat to its hot side, in addition to the 25 it's adding, so you're getting closer to 60 watts of heat being sent to the heat sink now, so you know it's going to get a lot hotter than with one peltier - which will raise your cold side temp which is what you were trying NOT to do. Stacking peltiers is rarely useful or productive.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:Peltier Cooler? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      it is a matter of volume. you put the cold side of the peltier on something SMALL, like a cpu core or someone's head, and the hot side and heat sink in something BIG, like the atmosphere at large. preferably not with a short airflow path back to the cold side. then your temperature differences are much better.

  32. Sounds like a good way to spend tax dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Send soldiers to Iraq and make sure even in Humvees they have a cooling suit. And also see to it they always have bottled water to drink.

    This reminds me of when Pratap Chatterjee was talking on C-Span booktv about his book "Iraq, Inc. : A Profitable Occupation" about all the wasteful spending and downright scams military contractors were running.

  33. Sure by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am going on a limg here and say your not wearing T-shirt, long pants, long sleeves, helmet, flak jacket,canteen, side arm, automatic weaponn, ammo, etc . . .

    All while looking for people trying to kill you.

    " I *never* even turn on my car's air conditioner (though admitedly, most people do)."

    yeah, well your a kook.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Sure by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1
      yeah, well your a kook.
      He's not the one running around in the desert wearing a T-shirt, long pants, long sleeves, helmet, flak jacket,canteen, side arm, automatic weaponn, ammo, etc . . . all while looking for people trying to kill him.
      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    2. Re:Sure by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I am going on a limg here and say your not wearing T-shirt, long pants, long sleeves, helmet, flak jacket,canteen, side arm, automatic weaponn, ammo, etc . . .

      You'd be mostly wrong, actually. Obviously I'm not wearing body armor, which probably makes a difference, but I can't imagine that accounts for the major disparity. I can't imagine the minor weight of the weapons and helmet making a noticable difference.

      All while looking for people trying to kill you.

      Are you kidding? Have you tried driving on the So.Cal roads lately? EVERYONE is trying to kill you...

      Seriously though, how much does "people trying to kill you" ammount to in terms of heat?

      yeah, well your a kook.

      No, I know quite a few other people who are the same. If you've grown-up in the desert, your body is very good at cooling itself. Probably 95% of it is behavior.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Sure by hackerjoe · · Score: 1
      If you've grown-up in the desert, your body is very good at cooling itself. Probably 95% of it is behavior.
      So to save on self-cooling body armor, the army should travel back in time and relocate the parents of enlisted soldiers to desert climates?

      Sounds practical to me! =D
    4. Re:Sure by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      He's not the one running around in the desert wearing a T-shirt, long pants, long sleeves, helmet, flak jacket,canteen, side arm, automatic weaponn, ammo, etc . . . all while looking for people trying to kill him.

      "Hello? Anyone who wants to kill me? Hello? Anyone? Are there any me-killers in this desert? Maybe someone with a mere strong antipathy towards me? Hello?"

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Sure by ezeri · · Score: 1

      Obviously I'm not wearing body armor, which probably makes a difference, but I can't imagine that accounts for the major disparity.
      That would be where you are wrong. Body armor is very very hot, its like having a winter coat on. Go to your local army surplus store and see if they have any, even on the coldest winter nights, it's likely you will be sweating underneath the body armor. Now imagine that in 125 degree weather.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now. - Ed Howd
    6. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking idiot who just likes to argue. Do us all a favor and kill yourself as soon as possible. Please.

  34. Why not install a/c? by pidge · · Score: 1

    Of course, they could just buy a Bushmaster.

    1. Re:Why not install a/c? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it would destroy the off road capability and take away power from sig units.

    2. Re:Why not install a/c? by pidge · · Score: 1
      Did you look at the capability of the Bushmaster?

      It can go off road and has power packs.

    3. Re:Why not install a/c? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The humvee can go under 5 feet of water is equipped to take direct blasts to any part of its chassis can carry roughly 4-5 people, can push around 75mph (the speedometer and specs will tell you different; but soldiers know). Can take on an array of weapons, the tires are capable of running flat, the sigops equipment fits right in. It can be hooked by an array of copter, almost anyone can drive it. On and on.. AC in a combat situation is a liability, nothing on the humvee should be seen as a liability which is why for the most part it doesn't exist. There are fresh air vents and thats about it. The only bad thing is that its flip over prone.. a blast to either the right or left side under body could easily kill a crew not because of the blast but the flip over could subsequently crush the roof depending on how its been put on. Then you have situations that depend on proper dressing etc etc.

      HMMWV (High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle).

      The Bushmaster at least in my eyes, is a piece of shit. It might have more horsepower and carry more crew but its not as agile in battle as the humvee. It's good for riot control maybe; but my opinion is going to be biased as an ex-soldier.

  35. Re:Whatever it takes by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

    "Suppose they gave a war, and nobody came? Why then, the war would come to you!" - Bertolt Brecht

  36. Merry christmas? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    I think you meant to say happy holiday!

    Nah, just kidding. I don't actually give a shit what it's called.
    Happy holiday! ;)

  37. Units by jmv · · Score: 1

    ...the vehicles could reportedly reach more than 130 degrees. 'It's like putting somebody in a toaster oven on low heat,...

    OK, so I have the temperature on the Fahrenheit scale and on the "kitchen appliances" scale. Now, how about a SI unit like, say, degrees Celcius (or Kelvin, why not)?

    1. Re:Units by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the vehicles could reportedly reach more than 130 amperes. 'It's like putting somebody in an electric chair on low heat,...

      Happy now?

      P.S. Celsius isn't SI, it's just very easy to convert.

    2. Re:Units by L0phtpDK · · Score: 1

      Ok sure:
      54.4 C. 327.6 Kelvin.
      Good 'ol math saves the day again.

    3. Re:Units by radja · · Score: 1

      at least state the unit. most people think celsius when seeing degrees and temperature.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    4. Re:Units by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, it's obvious that they have to water-cool the soldiers. No one would survive driving around in those temperatures for too long, even if the AC brings the temperature down to 95C...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  38. Military Development by clark625 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, yes, a coolsuit isn't news for some. What I take issue with is that you seem to have taken the same, unfortunate belief that so many smart people fall into. Military development isn't cheap, and because all the exact details are rarely given out to the public, it's assumed to be mostly waste. While this may be true in some cases, it's not the norm. Believe it or not, the Army does have a limited budget and actually cares about researching many areas simultaneously; thus they do care about waste.

    Anyway, there's always a difference between a commercial technology and a military one. Take this suit for example. How many times do you think racecar drivers get shot at while in their cars? If a bullet penetrates through, what will the results be? If there is fluid leakage, will it harm internal tissue or poison the blood stream, or is it so cold that muscles will tense up? If there are wires (and there are), could those short out and cause electrical damage to the wearer? If the system becomes non-functioning, what could happen that would prevent the wearer from continuing the mission? Lastly, what do the soldiers that will be issued this device think about it? You know, the guys that have been there, and will be going back? Yep, the Army gets everyone's input (even privates), and that's a huge benefit mostly unique to our military.

    As someone that's in the Army, I can tell you that we don't get issued ANYTHING unless the leadership is confident that it will benefit our mission. That's not a bad thing.

    --
    Long, cute, or funny Sigs are just another form of over compensation, used by geeks, nerdz, etc.
    1. Re:Military Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      As someone that's in the Army, I can tell you that we don't get issued ANYTHING unless the leadership is confident that it will benefit our mission.

      Sometimes that confidence is not just enough.

    2. Re:Military Development by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Take this suit for example. How many times do you think racecar drivers get shot at while in their cars? If a bullet penetrates through, what will the results be? If there is fluid leakage, will it harm internal tissue or poison the blood stream, or is it so cold that muscles will tense up? If there are wires (and there are), could those short out and cause electrical damage to the wearer? If the system becomes non-functioning, what could happen that would prevent the wearer from continuing the mission? Lastly, what do the soldiers that will be issued this device think about it? You know, the guys that have been there, and will be going back? Yep, the Army gets everyone's input (even privates), and that's a huge benefit mostly unique to our military.

      A coolsuit has no wires. All the "intelligence" (if there is any at all) is in the pump that is external to the body. The fluid is water, which will not harm a wound. Failure will result in a condition no worse than if the device had not been worn.

      All these things could have been found out for $50 (or whatever the cost is for a NASCAR ticket), or maybe for free by calling the right person. But, being the military, $4,000,000,000 needs to be spent to do it the military way, even if the same thing is in common civilian use. And no, it isn't just for car racing, but there are similar devices for medical use and other uses. They are common, well tested, and very inexpensive. Adaptation of civilian devices would have been nearly free. And, since there are many years of development behind some of these systems, I imagine the civilian ones could be not only cheaper, but more reliable. But what I suspect is that the real engineering was changing the vehicle A/C to cool water for these, and the vests are probably as close to off-the-shelf civilian gear as is ever issued to a soldier (hopefully not costing more than $100 each for the vests). And yes, the civilian ones did have a quick-disconnect hose that could be worked with gloves on or other impediments.

    3. Re:Military Development by jafac · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's assumed to be mostly waste.

      You misspelled "graft".

      I can tell you that we don't get issued ANYTHING unless the leadership is confident that it will benefit our mission.

      I suggest you study the history of the procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol, replacement for the old .45 auto. Pay careful attention to the bits about known problems with metal fatigue, and slide recoil injuring shooters.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    4. Re:Military Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you study the history of the procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol, replacement for the old .45 auto. Pay careful attention to the bits about known problems with metal fatigue, and slide recoil injuring shooters.

      If you are out on a mission and the only weapon you have left is your Beretta, then I think metal fatigue and the slide recoil injuring shooters is the least of your worries.

    5. Re:Military Development by still+cynical · · Score: 5, Informative
      I suggest you study the history of the procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol, replacement for the old .45 auto. Pay careful attention to the bits about known problems with metal fatigue, and slide recoil injuring shooters.


      If you mean the incidents that gave rise to the saying "You're not really a SEAL until you've eaten Italian steel", the problems were not with the pistol or the procurement system. The real problem was forcing the standard sidearm onto special ops units.

      The standard military sidearm has NEVER been intended for anything other than last-resort defensive use, or low-risk missions such as police, low-security guards, etc. Spec-ops guys such as SEALs, Special Forces, etc. need a pistol for primary and offensive use as well. The only way to do that (semi)effectively with a 9mm is to use ammo loaded to much higher pressures and velocities. The incidents you refer to were confined to Navy units using custom ammo loaded WAY past SAAMI specs, beyond what is usually called "+P+". Notice that it was never a wide-spread problem, and has not been known to recur since spec-ops were given more latitude to select and procure non-standard sidearms. The big H&K "offensive" pistol is designed specifically for the requirements of spec-ops, and to handle +P .45 ammo. I personally think it's not the best out there, but for very different reasons. Other special units are using .45s also, like the new 1911 designed for USMC Force Recon.

      So don't blame military waste, blame the penny-pinchers who oversee the military from nice civilian offices and have no idea what the complexities and realities are.
      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    6. Re:Military Development by jafac · · Score: 1

      You don't sound too cynical "still cynical" -

      The Beretta fiasco was just one example off the top of my head of the countless costly boondoggles American Taxpayers have paid for that do not benefit our soldiers in the field. Yes, there are a lot of really great tools that American troops get, that were worth every penny (PAC-3, F-22, Minuteman III, A-10, M-1).

      But there are many things that Americans paid for that either just plain don't work, or cost way more than they should. Stryker, Paladin, Osprey, Hornet, Halliburton's services in Gulf War Jr., etc. Some of this is done under cover of secrecy, to supposedly protect national security. Some of this is done out in the open (ie. whatever the hell Randy Duke Cunningham signed us up to buy from MZM for his $2 million in bribes).

      My point is, the parent poster's assertion that everything troops are issued is great and dandy, was very naive. Military procurement is a business. This business is full of corruption, (though there are honest players, and the defense workers I am directly familliar with are among the most highly ethical human beings I know). This business is for profit. Sometimes at the expense of the targets of this weaponry, sometimes at the expense of the US Taxpayers, and sometimes at the expense of US troops.

      I'm not saying that all cases like the Beretta (in that the problems were known and covered up, and the use of the Beretta was pushed to a broader scope than intended by the original program) are intentional or the result of graft. But graft happens, and it's extremely naive to believe it doesn't.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    7. Re:Military Development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""Other special units are using .45s also, like the new 1911 designed for USMC Force Recon.""

      Anyone have experience with these 1911's? IIRC, they are also used by LAPD SWAT, which would seem to need good sidearms...

    8. Re:Military Development by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The duty cycle on a piece of equipment used by NASCAR drivers isn't going to be anything like what it's going to experience in the military. How often do drivers race? Once a week, a few times a week? Once a day at most? How many connect/disconnect cycles are the connectors rated for? And the equipment is probably inspected after each use, and if it does fail, the consequences are relatively minor.

      Especially when these things are new and there aren't enough to go around, I could easily see one of these suits getting near-continuous usage in the military. That's twenty four hours a day in dusty, dirty, physically abusive conditions, subjected to all sorts of vibration, crushing, pinching, and abrasion, until it's either obviously unserviceable or fails.

      Adapting commercial off-the-shelf equipment for military usage isn't something that the people who design this stuff haven't though of. If there are civilian products like this already, I have no doubt that they probably have several for testing already. But that doesn't mean that they should just be sent out as-is; there are much more rigorous standards for military equipment than commercial stuff for a reason. I've seen what happens to COTS gear, even well made stuff, when it's subjected to military use for any length of time. It gets eaten up. In some cases that's okay -- it's considered practically disposable because it's cheap compared to mil-spec equivalents -- and people tend to get away with it in training sometimes as a result. But having stuff fail every 1000 hours versus every 10,000 hours means a lot more than just multiplying the manufacturing cost by 10, when you have a supply chain that stretches around the world.

      I guess my biggest point is this: the people that develop these things aren't stupid. Neither are the people who maintain the supply chains, and do the cost/benefit analysis. You can be sure that somewhere, someplace, somebody probably made a spreadsheet and a powerpoint presentation on why it was a better move to develop a military version of these suits, than to just order a whole lot more of the COTS version. We may not ever see that analysis exactly, and as a result the system seems wasteful (which is a different argument in itself: one about transparency), but it doesn't mean that's actually the case.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    9. Re:Military Development by Dr.+Cody · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suggest you study the history of the procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol, replacement for the old .45 auto.

      One caveat...

      Of all the fanboys I've ever met, none were ever as rabid as 1911 fanboys. A Muslim might strap himself to a bomb to fight infidels, a Christian might let themselves be thrown to the lions rather than give up his fate, but a 1911 fanboy will sit in his Lay-Z-Boy with the lights out for months just waiting for a burglar to shoot at so that he brag about it on m1911.org

    10. Re:Military Development by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The fluid has to be water so that it is not potentially harmful to soldiers. It is treated to retard bacterial growth. This is generally done with alcohol, which in small quantities will not be harmful (or flammable!) either. There are no wires, because the only thing going to the vest is a set of water lines (feed, and return.) And, to address issues mentioned in other comments responding to mine: The quick-disconnects are usually pretty pricy components, chosen for their ability to take abuse, and are large enough to operate while wearing gloves because people in these cars are wearing full-coverage fireproof suits (hence the overheating problems) which include gloves. And as for the fact that the military version uses a heat exchanger tied into the AC system, that's not a big shocker either. Such a device is not exactly complicated - it's a damned heat exchanger! The only part of the device that required any special design work was the heat exchanger box and strictly speaking you could install that on the duct output and do an air-to-water exchanger to cool the water. The only electrical component necessary in the system is the pump.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Military Development by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      I suggest you study the history of the procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol, replacement for the old .45 auto. Pay careful attention to the bits about known problems with metal fatigue, and slide recoil injuring shooters.

      Taking your advice, I googled for "procurement of the Beretta 9mm pistol". The first link returned (from the rec.guns FAQ) essentially said that there was no fault or problem with the gun; it said

      "The two unexpected slide breakage incidents occurred with non-NATO certified ammunition during non-standard, continuous endurance firing. Field use of the weapon was limited to 3,000 rounds each while a study of the cause of the breakage was being conducted"

      and, later

      "both breakage incidents occurred with a suspect lot of M882 ammunition."

      If the procurement problems you refer to are with respect to two slide breakages while using defective and non-standard ammunition, I find it hard to blame the gun:- one could produce faulty ammunition to break even the most well-designed of guns.

      Clearly, you can easily question my reply since I am not a gun expert; I'm really just reposting what I read in the article cited above. It's possible the problems and articles addressed in the article cited above are not the ones you have in mind; if this is the case, I would appreciate being pointed to a good article on the problems you describe.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    12. Re:Military Development by still+cynical · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that all cases like the Beretta (in that the problems were known and covered up, and the use of the Beretta was pushed to a broader scope than intended by the original program) are intentional or the result of graft. But graft happens, and it's extremely naive to believe it doesn't.


      Very true. I'd never dispute that. But it's hard to distinguish between corruption and stupidity, especially in the Federal Gov't, which seems to have institutionalized both.

      (How's that for cynical?) ;-)
      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    13. Re:Military Development by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      If a bullet penetrates your body or equipment or armour, leaking water from a suit's cooling tubes is the least part of your problem.

  39. Waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldnt it be easier to just bring them home ?

  40. That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 0, Troll

    ..your taxes. I mean ultra modern suits that don't work, ultra modern PC-s and equipment that just makes everything harder to operate with rather than easier.. it's just suspicious tech firms milking the military department.

    Because this is what war is used for, you know when the war starts, it better last long, cuz that's the time lots of people make LOOTS of money selling overhyped and overpriced gadgets to those poor soldiers.

    Oh, and reminds me of a popular old story about NASA spending millions to invent a pen that works in zero gravity environment. They finally nailed it, but at quite the cost.. The alternative solution by the Russians? Use pencil.

    1. Re:That's just piggybanking... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You tell me how much pencil shavings and graphite powder you'd like in your lungs and then tell me that the pen was such a bad idea. Snopes is your friend.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:That's just piggybanking... by agingell · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hate to say it but NASA did not spend any money on the space pen, both American and Russian space programs used grease pencils until the 'space pen' was produced.

      A chap called Paul C. Fisher of the Fisher Pen Co. invested about 1million USD to develop the ball point with presurised ink at no cost to the USA / NASA.

      Approx 400 pens were sold to NASA at 6USD each for the Apollo program, and they were also sold to the Russians fo r the Soyuz program.

      The Fisher Pen Co. still makes and sells them.

    3. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? Pencil "shaver" that wets the pencil and has slight influx of air and filter on the other end and done. I can build one with what I have laying around.

      But even without the influx I can just spit on it and shave it and I guarantee no tiny particles will be in the air :)

      Come on, it doesn't take millions of dollars dude.

      Also as you're reading this, you're breathing in pieces of death skin, microbes and small particles of garbage (also known as dust) and ah yea, also small living insects... How about throwing few million dollars on that? Or not, because actually we're just ok with it.

    4. Re:That's just piggybanking... by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Come on, it doesn't take millions of dollars dude.

      neither did the pen. RTF snopes article.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. I suspected it's not exactly like this, but it still is one great (pseudo)example of what is happening with the military equipment.

      Honestly - suits are heavy and hot? Solution? Not fix suits/make them lighter or anything (I mean has/can anybody built stats of whether wearing so much "protection" disabling swift action and maneuvres can do more harm than help a soldier?).

      Instead plaster more technology on them. Which will create problems on its own so what's next? Special robotic enhancements to the soldier's legs and arms so he can move better? Then if he runs out of batteries have accumulator attached on him?

      I know I'm being ridiculous but I'm proving a point. You can't just plaster layers and layers of tech trying to solve what the previous layer did. At the end only one wins: those damn firms coming up with absurd inventions to pitch to the military.

    6. Re:That's just piggybanking... by v1 · · Score: 1

      There are actualy quite a few good reasons for that investment. Pens will draw a lot more than pencils, by weight. And weight is everything when you are delivering groceries to orbit.

      Also, pencils must be sharpened. NASA is crazy about anything that makes a mess. Keeping a capsule clean in zero g is very hard to do - dust and crud can gather on ALL SURFACES including the "ceiling". And there's a lot of delicate equipment up there. Pencil shavings are not something NASA wants to have to deal with. (it also increases the amount of trash generated, and all garbage has to be hauled back to earth, it cannot simply be jettisoned) I can just imagine their reaction to eraser-crumbs.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    7. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      A. invested about 1million USD to develop the ball point
      B. 400 pens were sold to NASA at 6USD each

      Ouch..

    8. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      well, there are automatic pencils (have one here) where you just push a button and it reveals more of the graphite. This avoid the weight/trash problem.

      And there are oilier but still hard sticks of graphite (wow that'd look odd out of context), say something between pastel and a pencil, to avoid the dust problem.

      So uhmm.. and anyway not to get a lot off topic on this whole thing, but.. Fisher spent a million (officially) on those and then sold few hundred of 'em for a couple of bucks? Talk about poor ROI.

    9. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly - suits are heavy and hot? Solution? Not fix suits/make them lighter or anything (I mean has/can anybody built stats of whether wearing so much "protection" disabling swift action and maneuvres can do more harm than help a soldier?).

      There are some soldiers who try to claim such BS so that they don't have to carry all that heavy shit, but they generally either get smart or get dead. There was a Marine recon unit who tried playing that "we're all elite and shit and armor just slows us down" but they changed their minds after getting pinned down on a bridge and taking far too many casualties. Take a look at latest offerings and the trend is very strongly towards adding more armor. Soft armor over the shoulders and along the sides of the legs in particular.

      They aren't in the matrix and they can't move fast enough to dodge bullets or fragments from IEDs.

    10. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the bottom of the post...

      "The Fisher Pen Co. still makes and sells them."

    11. Re:That's just piggybanking... by tsotha · · Score: 1
      Honestly - suits are heavy and hot? Solution? Not fix suits/make them lighter or anything (I mean has/can anybody built stats of whether wearing so much "protection" disabling swift action and maneuvres can do more harm than help a soldier?).

      Suits are heavy and hot because they're the best armor protection the troops can reasonably carry around. If you can come up with a better material the suits will still be just as heavy and hot, but they'll be able to stop higher power bullets. You can never really have enough protection; you carry as much armor as you can get away with.

      The current conflict in Iraq is the first time troops could carry enough armor to stop a standard military rifle bullet, and then only if it hits one of the ceramic inserts secreted around the vest. There are lots of impact angles and surfaces that won't stop a rifle bullet - we have a long way to go before we can start thinking less weight is a good tradeoff for protection.

      At the end only one wins: those damn firms coming up with absurd inventions to pitch to the military.

      Now this is just pure ignorance. I would suggest you spend a little more time on milblogs and less on slashdot if you want to understand what's really going on here. There's a reason this war has a much, much lower casualty rate than previos wars.

    12. Re:That's just piggybanking... by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      In this war less innocent people died than in previous wars. Yea well, more than from all suicide bombers in Iraq summed, but what the hell, stats can always be twisted to look good for either side.

    13. Re:That's just piggybanking... by tsotha · · Score: 1
      There's no way you can twist the US casualty figures to look bad. The fact is for the intensity of the conflict we're taking about 1/10th the casualties you'd expect based on previous wars. Part of that is the overwhelming firepower that will end a stand-up fight quickly, and part of it is the result of a superbly trained volunteer army. But you can't discount the effect of body armor.

      The civilians are irrelevant to a discussion of body armor, unless they pick up weapons and become "insurgents" or "terrorists", as you prefer.

  41. Re:Whatever it takes by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

    I can think of 3,000 or so people who might disagree with this, if they could.

        - AJ

  42. Re:Whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're home feeling safe because we have brave men and women serving their country for us. Waging war and freeing oppressed people is what makes the USA so strong and successful. Never in history has there been such a benevolent superpower like the United States of America.

    That's why we want them home, but wish for their best when they are fighting for us.

    Freedom isn't free.

  43. Re:Whatever it takes by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Well since the US hasn't declared war since 1942, I'd say that they have pretty much stopped.

    It's much more convenient to have conflicts instead, since you don't have to abide by all those pesky international rules.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  44. AC? How about a real world Rifle .Cal by Retting · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Heat isn't affecting soldiers as much as an inadequate rifle round ".223." The 223 was meant for spray and pray fire superiority in the jungles, at low cost, and low weight. The military needs to invest in a decent round i.e. 308/7.62x#! That can effectively go through things and have enough power for any infantry soldier to take out an engine block. Soldiers die because of an inexcusable round, because its cost effective. Even the days of the tumbling 223 are over due to using NATO specs. And for fracks sake how about a decent sidearm! Give them all one! You buddy must have the same Mag!

    1. Re:AC? How about a real world Rifle .Cal by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Decent sidearm? IIRC, officers can chose the old standby.45 cal as well as the 9mm. Niether one is a slouch of a firearm. The .223 (5.56mmm) round was used in the M-16 to keep the recoil low and prevent the muzzle walking up and wasting ammo shot over the head of the target. With the invention of body armor the 223 round isn't going to do any damage unless it is a lucky shot. Too bad they can't use the captured AK's, those are all 7.63mm, and look at all the free ammo just lying around all over the world.

    2. Re:AC? How about a real world Rifle .Cal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "With the invention of body armor the 223 round isn't going to do any damage unless it is a lucky shot."

      Obviously you are not aware the military has stocks of .223 armour peircing ammo at it's disposal.
      I cannot comment whether it is standard issue, but those green tipped little bastards will definately ruin your day, vest or not. To all those who bemoan the round as innefective, I can only say: Let me hit you with one and see if you change your mind.

      It would be interesting to hear from any /.ers out there that have front line combat experience, whether insurgents have actually taken to wearing vests in ant real quantity or not. My guess is that most of them are playing sneaky bastard with IED's, not going toe to toe where they innevitably get the shit kicked out of themselves.

      BTW: the AK is 7.62mm, and have you ever tried getting the ammo out of those prepacked russian tins?? Better plan on issuing can openers with the AK's.

    3. Re:AC? How about a real world Rifle .Cal by eagl · · Score: 1

      I've carried the 9mm (USAF) in a combat zone and it's the source of many jokes. It is a weak round with limited stopping or penetrating power. I am also not given the option to use/carry any other weapon on duty. In Desert Storm, many USAF pilots brought their own more powerful weapons with them because the 9mm round sucks, but they've tightened down the rules since then.

      I own the same beretta used by the military, but chambered in .40 cal. It has the exact same dimensions as the 9mm but the .40cal round has a lot more stopping power. But I wouldn't be allowed to take it with me to Iraq. Special forces and other troops with specific requirements are authorized alternative weapons, but for the average troop you get an M-16 variant or the 9mm Beretta.

      I know someone who jokes that the only thing the 9mm is good for is convincing someone nearby to give up their M-16 (haha). Realistically, the usual plan is if they're stuck with only the 9mm pistol for some reason, just keep it in the holster because it identifies them as an officer, and pick up whatever else gets dropped by the first casualties. If that means picking up an AK or whatever the enemy is using, that's fine too.

    4. Re:AC? How about a real world Rifle .Cal by Retting · · Score: 0

      "have you ever tried getting the ammo out of those prepacked russian tins??" Would help if you were issued a knife.

  45. I thought Slashdot was full of geeks... by masdog · · Score: 1

    All these posts and not one single mention of Battletech?? What is Slashdot coming to?

    1. Re:I thought Slashdot was full of geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was waiting for the Dune references myself, heh.

    2. Re:I thought Slashdot was full of geeks... by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      Ok, as far as I know, I was the only one who brought up the battletech connection when the military intorduced the Stryker which I though looked familiar. I think it's obvious that someone in the pentagon has spent more than one late night checking off armor boxes. In order to convince everyone, though, I guess we'll just have to wait for the final proof to walk off the assembly line.

  46. Big Deal by ndansmith · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nike Developed already these for the University of Oregon football team:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Ducks#Relation ship_with_Nike
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2003/football/nca a/08/26/bc.fbc.missst.nike.ap/
    http://www.fanblogs.com/pac10/004233.php

    Some sources say that they use some sort of liquid coolant, which can also be heated, while others say compressed air is used. Still, the point is that the Ducks are better equipped than the Army.

  47. Re:Whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>> What it takes to get them home safely: stop declaring war on people. :P

    That way we'll just be complicit with terrorists and LET them attack us! What a perfect plan! Oh wait, when did Congress declare war again?

  48. Re:Whatever it takes by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Oh boy :-( Don't tell me you are trying to tie 9/11 to Iraq. Dubya/Dick..that you?

    --
    "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
  49. Re:Whatever it takes by achurch · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can think of 3,000 or so people who might disagree with this, if they could.

    And I can think of 30,000 or so people who might agree with it, if they could. Your point?

  50. Bah, it's been around for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they've been looking at this system from the looks of it. After all, why not use the body to recharge the batteries?

  51. What am I missing? by FreeBSD+evangelist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why don't they just fix the air conditioning in the HumVee in the first place.

    1. Re:What am I missing? by jonr · · Score: 1

      There is no money in that, you could just take simple off-the-shelf AC and put it in the Hummvee! How are we supposed to make money on it that way?
      Are you a communist or something?

  52. No doubt! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    Freedom isn't free.

    It costs a buck-oh-five.

    1. Re:No doubt! by Doolspin · · Score: 1, Funny

      round here it costs about $2.27...

  53. Already done in Israeli tanks(?) by horacerumpole · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I don't remember where is this originated, but I've heard of research which came up with the conclusion that just cooling the head by 2-3 degrees celsius (4-5 fahrenheit?) helps a lot in letting a person concentrate. I think Israeli tank crews have such head coolers attached to their helmets.

    Then again - a tank's crew mission is usually to stay in the tank while a humvee crew might have a need to move around more easely (but maybe just cooling their head will help to decrease the cooling unit size and weight).

    1. Re:Already done in Israeli tanks(?) by serutan · · Score: 1

      My old roommate came out of the Army with a saying, "If you want to keep your feet warm, keep your head warm." I've since noticed that when I am cold, say trying to sleep with not enough blankets, covering the top of my head with something invariably warms me right up. Seems like the reverse would apply.

    2. Re:Already done in Israeli tanks(?) by horacerumpole · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure how much this is related.

      About what you describe - while backpacking and learning to ski over ten years ago I was tought by numerous people I met that around 30% of the body's heat releasing is done through the head, therefore any head cover can make a difference.

      I'm not sure how much the reverse is related - I think that cooling the head has more to do with letting the brain function in normal temperature instead of focusing on cooling itself with increased blood flow.

  54. EJUNKOVERLOAD or killed by their own supplies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eventually american soldiers will die under the weight of the junk they have to carry if Bush keeps the war industry in overdrive.

  55. Nuts by thunderpaws · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A small cooler for the head, and maybe for under the armpits, would be cheaper and more easily distributed to all infantry that would not add much bulk or weight to their body armor. More junk makes it harder the the troops to fire and maneuver. These suits are better suited for armor rather than scout vehicles.

  56. Overclocked soldiers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA:

    Each Humvee cooling kit consists of four water-filled vests known as Air Warrior Microclimatic Cooling Garments or MCGs. Fungicide-treated water is chilled by the AC system in the Humvee and circulated through the garment

    As if the tech difference wasn't enough, now watercooled, overclocked soldiers can get some more FPS and an even higher frag count.

  57. Re:Whatever it takes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why then, the war would come to YOU!

    I bet Brecht was a Soviet.

  58. Do what all the other invaders did by Simonetta · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sooner or later, the Americans in Iraq will do what all the other people who have invaded Iraq over the past three thousand years have done. Which is, go native.

      20 million people live in Iraq all year round all their lives. Do what they do to deal with the heat. Instead of $5000 air conditioned suits, consider wearing a shawez kameez or other clothing that has been developed by the locals over a thousand years to deal with the climate. Since the Americans are going to be there for a long time, they may as well start making an effort to blend in.

        Iraq has been invaded countless times in its history. After a few years the invaders either move on to someplace with better weather or they start the long process of becoming just another minority in Iraq. The Americans are really any different. Eventually the individual solders will drift out of the command structure and find that they have to make a seperate peace with the local people. Dressing like them is a good start.

    1. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Wonko · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Do what they do to deal with the heat. Instead of $5000 air conditioned suits, consider wearing a shawez kameez or other clothing that has been developed by the locals over a thousand years to deal with the climate.

      Yeah, because the natives drive around in heavily armored humvees all day long, right? Personally, I know that sitting in a slow moving car, with the windows down, in the Texas sun in the middle of the summer is quite hot. What is it going to be like if you raise the temperature and decrease the ventilation?

      I believe they will require some active cooling.

    2. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by mnmn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Americans I've known had trouble going without the undies. They just need something tight to squish the package no matter the weather.

      I dont know about the arabic dress but the shalwar kameez is awesome and very versatile. People wear it in the morning jogging, soldiers wear it fighting, its a nightgown and a formal dress too. We used to just order 5x of em back home in different colors, and use the older ones for nightgowns etc. The tailor just had our measurements, no hassle, no hawaii shirts for friday or beach shorts or khakhis for casual days or tux for wedding days etc.

      Getting back to history, when we (Mongols) had Iraq we couldnt last much long in there. We left some governors in cool areas and the rest left. Russia was much nicer. I dont expect the Americans to simply adjust to the 50C heat, well maybe the aussies and the texans. Certainly not the New Yorkers.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    3. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Doubtful.

      American soldiers have never gone "native" while in the Service. Look at the American soldiers on the Great Plains, Southwest, Philippines, Hawaii, Panama or Haiti. They don't change uniforms, they don't adapt local uniforms nor local equipment.

      The Americans who "drift" out of command will end up rotating to the United States, maybe one in ten thousand will end up in Iraq with the locals.

    4. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by evilviper · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yeah, because the natives drive around in heavily armored humvees all day long, right?

      If they did, they would be much COOLER. If you read the article, you'd know standard air conditioning is already used, and gets up to 95F degrees at most. Outside tempuratures are much higer.

      If you can handle outside tempuratures for long periods of time, you can handle sitting in a humvee.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by djrogers · · Score: 1
      Instead of $5000 air conditioned suits, consider wearing a shawez kameez or other clothing that has been developed by the locals over a thousand years to deal with the climate.
      Interesting, does this locally developed clothing deal with car bombs and AK47 rounds too? What? Oh well, nice try. Please remember that our troops are not there to sightsee - they are being shot at, and body armor is a good thing when you are being shot at. Or so I hear...
      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    6. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Wonko · · Score: 1

      If they did, they would be much COOLER. If you read the article, you'd know standard air conditioning is already used, and gets up to 95F degrees at most. Outside tempuratures are much higer.

      I am sorry. I assumed you meant that they should wear native clothing and use no form of climate control whatsoever. You made it sound as if that was all they needed.

      If you can handle outside tempuratures for long periods of time, you can handle sitting in a humvee.

      I don't think 95 degrees is cool enough for any kind of clothing. What are the qualities of this clothing you are proposing that would help keep a soldier in a 95 degree humvee cool? I assume (hope?) that not a lot of sunlight actually hits the occupants of an armored vehicle (windows aren't as sturdy as steel :p).

      Are you sure that this clothing helps at all when the ambient temperature isn't higher than your body temperature? Does it still provide any advantages when absorbing heat from sunlight isn't much of an issue? How well does it work when you have to wear body armor underneath?

      I am very ignorant of what to wear in a hot climate. Where I grew up it gets pretty cold in the winter and not particularly not in the summer. I don't enjoy anything over 90 degrees :p.

    7. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by avenj · · Score: 1

      Slightly offtopic, but.. is the military using body armor that can actually stop a 7.62x39 from an AK? I'm not up on the current armor situation, but stopping a rifle round is not an easy task.

    8. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I am sorry. I assumed you meant that they should wear native clothing and use no form of climate control whatsoever. You made it sound as if that was all they needed.

      No, not 'me'. I'm just a random /.er who jumped into your thread here. Ask the OP, not me.

      I don't think 95 degrees is cool enough for any kind of clothing.

      That's just because you've never spent any time in the desert. Try Arizona, where 130F degrees is common. In case you're wondering, people don't walk around with blocks of ice on their heads. I can assure you, anyone can get along just fine at 95F degrees.

      Are you sure that this clothing helps at all when the ambient temperature isn't higher than your body temperature?

      Not speaking for the OP, but yes... Your body tempurature is lower than ambient only because of your sweat, which is how your body lowers its tempurature. The clothing worn by nomads and the like serves both to insulate you from heated air and sunlight, as well as to make better use of your own sweat.

      The US military's hot-weather camos actually are designed with that latter purpose in-mind, but require much more sweat for the same effect, thereby requiring much more water intake, and therefore more energy and body heat to accomplish the same thing. It was generally considered an equally functional solution assuming unlimited water, but considering the necessity of refridgerated vests, it seems that assumption wasn't quite correct.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The flak jacket itself will not stop a rifle round (I'm not entirely sure about a handgun round), however when worn with a "trauma plate" it will. The plates are steel -- or more recently, some sort of ceramic 'Chobham' composite -- inserts that fit into pockets over the center of the chest and back. The steel ones at least are no fun at all, they're very heavy and I doubt that most guys who aren't really expecting to get shot at wear them. The ceramic ones I've heard are a big improvement but I don't know how widely distributed they are, or what people think of them.

      The kevlar helmet is supposedly able to stop a 7.62mm rifle round, although I'm not sure at exactly what distance. It does not stop the 5.56mm round fired by the M-16. In fact the ammunition in the M-16 was designed specifically to penetrate the kevlar, among other things (it has a steel core as opposed to the older solid lead bullets).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    10. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because the natives drive around in heavily armored humvees all day long, right?

      No, they just shoot at them. :(

    11. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have an actual bullet-stopping vest sitting right next to me, along with a separate flak-only vest. The flak vest is very like and folds like thick, rigid cloth, but the ceramic plate inside the body armor vest is not bendable, and specifically states that it is designed to stop rounds the size of the larger AK series. Try googling for Ceradyne... their website has some very cool information on the body armor they offer.

    12. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have, apparently, not thought this through.

      Why does water cool people down? Because heat is convected from the human body into the water, which then evaporates. This disipates the heat energy.

      Have you ever lived in a hot, dry climate? Anything short of water cooling of some sort will NOT cool them down at a fast enough rate. They have ambient dry heat indexes of 120F on a regular, daily basis over there. Have you ever gotten into a vehicle during the middle of the summer, and the steering wheel is too hot to touch? You'll immediately roll the window down because it's almost too hot to breath. It rarely gets above 105F in the US. Now, think of being in an armored vehicle, with the motor running, and the heat on, with the windows down, wearing a combat pack, long clothing, boots, gloves, and a helmet - and with 5 other men in the vehicle with you. THAT is the kind of heat they are in over there.

      Look at a photo from Iraq of our troops. Notice how everyone is wearing gloves? There's a reason for that: their guns and other gear are too hot to touch.

      The only way they could really do it would be with water of some sort. The only practical way to do it is to drink it, as pouring it on yourself or your clothing will a) get you dirty - really dirty - really quickly, b) do little, as it will evaporate too quickly, c) waste valuable water, and d) decrease their agility and ability to move quickly.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually the individual solders will drift out of the command structure and find that they have to make a seperate peace with the local people.


      you're fucking delusional.

      drifting out of the command structure is a nice way to end up in the brig and not where you want to be: which is back home.
    14. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by ACME+Septic · · Score: 0, Insightful

      I dont expect the Americans to simply adjust to the 50C heat, well maybe the aussies and the texans. Certainly not the New Yorkers. Two things. (a) You've never been in Manhattan in the summer time, and (b) you don't know where Australia is located.

    15. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by kamapuaa · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How does this get rated +5? It makes no sense These clothes aren't for what to wear around town, it's for what to wear while in an armored running tank with poor ventilation. Iraqi clothing wasn't developed for such cases and wouldn't be appropriate - it doesn't matter what clothes you wear or don't wear, they won't keep you cool at 130 degrees without ventilation.

      And the idea that American soldiers are going to start blending in with native populations is of course completely ludicrous. Not so say it couldn't happen in the far future, but it's certainly not happening now, give me a break.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    16. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's shalwar, surely?

    17. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      if you raise the temperature and decrease the ventilation?


      Imagine if one of them had to fart?
    18. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by two_socks · · Score: 1

      When I was there (Kuwait, actually, not Iraq), we all sort of wound up "going native", in that we just got used to the heat. When I realized it didnt find 115 degrees particularly hot any more, I was pretty surprised. When I was patrolling after a long summer and shivering at about 80 degrees, I was even more surprised.

      That said, any of the natives that can stay out of the sun and out of the heat during the day. It is only the poorest people that had to work under those conditions.

      --
      I can't help it - I'm a 19D.
    19. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by F_Scentura · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I don't think 95 degrees is cool enough for any kind of clothing."

      Well, people here in Miami are *nearly* naked, but we keep that mostly to our beaches and clubs.

    20. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Wonko · · Score: 1

      No, not 'me'. I'm just a random /.er who jumped into your thread here. Ask the OP, not me.

      Sorry, I was apparently paying very little attention :p

      That's just because you've never spent any time in the desert. Try Arizona, where 130F degrees is common. In case you're wondering, people don't walk around with blocks of ice on their heads. I can assure you, anyone can get along just fine at 95F degrees.

      No, they don't walk around with blocks of ice on their heads. The sane ones do exactly what I would be doing... Staying where it is air conditioned :p.

      Not speaking for the OP, but yes... Your body tempurature is lower than ambient only because of your sweat, which is how your body lowers its tempurature. The clothing worn by nomads and the like serves both to insulate you from heated air and sunlight, as well as to make better use of your own sweat.

      I understand the purpose of sweat. What I am curious about is whether or not this clothing helps nearly as much at 95 degrees as it does over 100 degrees. I would also assume that they wouldn't make good use of sweat with any amount of body armor underneath :).

      The US military's hot-weather camos actually are designed with that latter purpose in-mind, but require much more sweat for the same effect, thereby requiring much more water intake, and therefore more energy and body heat to accomplish the same thing. It was generally considered an equally functional solution assuming unlimited water, but considering the necessity of refridgerated vests, it seems that assumption wasn't quite correct.

      I would assume that sweat evaporates rather quickly inside one of these humvees. Desert whould be low humidity and AC does a very good job of drying out the air as well.

    21. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
      Haven't you ever seen Dances with Wolves?

      Sgt. Bauer: Turned injun, didn't yeh?

    22. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Tolaris · · Score: 1

      You have clearly never visited Iraq in the summer. I lived there for two years. June-September is consistently over 120 degrees, with the month of August around 140 all the time. 130 at night - no variation.

      Secondly, they use standard air conditioning only in homes, and only if they are rich or lucky enough to both afford regular power (a generator) and a good A/C (most are crappy Korean/Chinese window models). Only rich peoples' cars have functional A/C.

    23. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Two replies
      (a) I know where Australia is located. Theyre allied to the US in the war too.

      (b) I've been to Manhattan in July 2000 for 2 weeks. I walked around all over NYC. I've also lived all over Balochistan and Sindh in Pakistan.

      Once again, a dude from Manhattan (who might have NO problems in the searing summer heat of NYC) will not last more than a couple of hours in the kind of heat Ive seen and expect to be in Iraq. 32C and 50C are 18C apart.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    24. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      He'd be the 1 in a 1000 that go native. Actually the number was likely closer to 1 in 2 or 3000 I'd expect.

    25. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by yet+another+coward · · Score: 1
      ersonally, I know that sitting in a slow moving car, with the windows down, in the Texas sun in the middle of the summer is quite hot.


      Use the 4-80 air conditioning system, 4 windows down and 80 miles an hour.
    26. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by evilviper · · Score: 1
      June-September is consistently over 120 degrees, with the month of August around 140 all the time. 130 at night - no variation.

      Interesting... considering that the highest tempurature every recorded was 136F, and that was in Libya, not Iraq, and was over 80 years ago. The second hottest was 134F in Death Valley over 90 years ago, which is not far from where I live.

      Only rich peoples' cars have functional A/C.

      Who cares? We are talking about American Humvees, which DO have A/C, whether you believe it or not.

      In conclusion, I have no idea what you are ranting about. I can only assume you have completely and totally misread this discussion.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by Tolaris · · Score: 1

      Interesting... considering that the highest tempurature every recorded was 136F, and that was in Libya, not Iraq, and was over 80 years ago. The second hottest was 134F in Death Valley over 90 years ago, which is not far from where I live.

      Believe what you like about posted records - weather.com hasn't exactly been maintaining recording stations in Baghdad for the last ten years. I've lived through two summers in that heat - top recorded shade temp we had at my company was 62 deg C (143.6 deg F) in August 2003, in Al-Mansur District of Baghdad. It got hotter in the direct sun on the rooftops.

    28. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Believe what you like about posted records - weather.com hasn't exactly been maintaining recording stations in Baghdad for the last ten years.

      I think it's much safer to assume that your tempurature testing facilities and methods probably aren't up to par, as opposed to Iraq now being the hottest place on earth, by a huge margin, and only one random person on /. realizing it.

      It got hotter in the direct sun on the rooftops.

      I wouldn't imagine it would get colder in direct sunlight. Did you have some point in mentioning this?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by persicom · · Score: 1

      And you feel the need to insult New Yorkers? Why?

    30. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by rk · · Score: 1

      "Try Arizona, where 130F degrees is common."

      130 degrees is not common in AZ unless you're talking surface temperature on asphalt or something like that.

      110, 115? Yeah that's pretty common. We sometimes peak at 120, but that's hardly common. 130? That's an infrequent temperature globally, and to my knowledge has never been reached in Arizona.

      Still, it's damn hot here in the summer.

    31. Re:Do what all the other invaders did by evilviper · · Score: 1
      130 degrees is not common in AZ

      It's a big state, and I doubt you've lived in all the cities there...

      130? That's an infrequent temperature globally, and to my knowledge has never been reached in Arizona.

      Perhaps not, but several cities in AZ still get very, very close to 130, regularly.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  59. Re:Whatever it takes by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What's worse is that our military operations are no longer even called wars, they are police actions, conflicts, and authorized uses of force.

    The term war is now only utilized for government policies with no chance of success, such as the "War on Drugs", the "War on Poverty" and the "War on Terror". And since we have no hope of winning, "war" is now a permanent state of affairs.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  60. Do it the PC Modders' Way! by hot+soldering+iron · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Take an off the shelf cool suit vest with collar and cap (Waterblock) and connect it to a canteen (pump/reservoir), and then to a second cool suit vest(radiator) over your jacket/flackvest (case). You might connect a Peltier cooler, since the temp differential needed shouldn't exceed 50-60 degrees, Farenheit. A rechargable 12VDC pack for the cooler and pump, and you're DONE!

    If I say I'm an engineer, can I get a fat gov. contract?

    --
    When you want something built, come see me. If you want correct grammar and spelling, get a F*ing liberal arts student.
  61. So... by CptPicard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all American soldiers will look like Mr. Freeze and spew inane one-liners at Iraqis... "I'll put joo in da koolah!!"

    --
    I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
  62. WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But with the extra armor and doors closed, temperatures inside the vehicles could reportedly reach more than 130 degrees.



    Ugh. Next thing people are complaining that they're being shot at, huh ? This is friggin' WAR they're fighting (even if the meaning of WAR seems to be lost to most Americans. When was the last time a fleet of bombers dumped a couple thousands tons of explosives on a city, and did the same thing to a different city for the next few weeks ?), and if they can't deal with a little bit of personal discomfort, such as being slightly too hot, maybe they should quit their job and look for some nice and cushy desk job in a safe, air-conditioned office.

    1. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by Robbyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was going to let this thread go but this post kinda hit my buttons. Normally, I wouldnt reply to an anonymous coward, but I defend this individuals right to spew whatever he wants as an anonymous coward.

      First -- 130 degrees? Where were they testing this thing, Michigan in August? It regularly hits 110-120 in that area of the world. Going on the 35 degree temp spread as mentioned in the article, we are talking 110 outside, 145+ inside... Hmmmmm

      Second -- Can you deal with the personal discomfort of a field environment, temps regularly hitting triple digits (Im talking outdoors, not in a tactical vehicle, Tacticle vehicles, you will yearn for 90 after 10 mins on one of them), combat stress of random bullets flying around? This poster probabally has a nice and cushy desk job in a safe, air-conditioned office somewhere. If so, the cold is causing this person to forget something interesting:

      When was the last time the USA has fought any type of conflict in a desert environment FOR A SUSTAINED PERIOD. Desert Shield/Storm was quick in the grand scheme of things. Most of our conflicts were in a tropical or continental type of environment (continental I mean grassy/forests... not desert or rainforest extremes). We have not had to deal with any type of sustained combat operations in a desert environment.

      The stresses that are experienced by both our equipment and Troops out there have forced a major rethinking of strategy and equipping of our personnel to address these climatic extremes. I think AC units in these HMMWV's are a nifty idea, but not necessarially a good one due to the cost of maintaining one in a piece of equipment like this, in the environment that they serve in. Same extends to these vests, good idea in theory, lets see how well this equipment lasts when our fightin boys beat this equipment up. Yes, they take care of it because its their lifeline, but we will see how they handle the combat stresses endured in daily operations. I hope it works, because we need this type of gear and a conflict like this is allowing our best and brightest in this country to think outside of the box to provide us with equipment that will make life a little more tolerable.

      So In closing anonymous coward; YOU enjoy your air-conditioning and cushy life... Maybe if you want an idea of how we feel, without stressing your self out too badly... Wear a 3 piece suit (Its about as heavy as the utility uniform). Drive to work when its nice and hot outside (80+ stateside should do the trick) with your windows cracked and your heat on full blast... You will get an idea of what we deal with. Oh, add the body armor, 3 weeks of stink from not taking a shower, oh and bullets, yes bullets flying at you randomly. You will have somewhat of a clue what is dealt with. Are these ideas perfect? Hell no... But it is a logical idea that cant hurt at this point. Robert Active Duty Marine Maintenance Management Specialist My comments do not reflect that of the US Government or Marine Corps. Just one little guy's random thoughts based on my version of reality, it may or may not match up with yours.

    2. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by jam244 · · Score: 1

      Finally. Someone with direct experience to speak to the environment these are meant for. Then again, what else is /. for if not to make wild assumptions based mostly on groupthink?

    3. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is not 'slight discomfort' 130 degrees F is potentially fatal. and and enlisted soldier cannot 'quit thier job' unless they get shot or go to leavenworth. secondly the more energy (not in a strict physics sense) exerted towards dealing with the extreme heat is energy that cannot be put towards shooting back when one gets shot at. something like this will mean the difference between life and death when a soldier is dehydrated and cannot get quick access to drinking water. heat is not too hard to deal with if you can stay hydrated well, but in combat conditions anything can go wrong. i garuntee this will bring at least some more of our soldiers home. tho it can't bring all of them home.

    4. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by nollaigoc · · Score: 1

      Why are you using 130 degrees. The rest of the developed world uses the Celcius degree calibration, but I suppose that the USA is still undeveloped, nay medieval, they still use rendtion or torture on their enemies or supposed enemies. The Imperial system, only remains in USA - units and torture.

    5. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by TheLinuxWarrior · · Score: 1

      You are a dumbass. 130 + in full combat gear is not "uncomfortable", it is potentially hazzardous. We're not talking about installing fucking lazy boy recliners in the trucks, we're talking about making sure these people don't become heat casualties before ever reaching the fight. And just for the record, I served 11 years, and did my tour in Iraq in GW 1, so yes, I do know WTF I'm talking about from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, not just some bullshit I got from CNN or the Internet.

    6. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Not to feed the trolls, but what exactly is a 'legal' war? Is it one the UN signs off on? Does that mean that Korean war would have been illegal if the USSR had not been stupid and walked out that day instead of vetoing it? Was World War I and World War II illegal wars? What the fuck exactly are the conditions to make a war 'legal'?

    7. Re:WAR. That doesn't mean the job is nice. by erbmjw · · Score: 1
  63. Opening Shock by -ryan · · Score: 1

    And can it take the opening shock of a parachute, impact with the ground, does it make my already heavy as f*** load heavier, and can it take abuse from privates in the infantry? Let me tell you, almost nothing can withstand the latter. We break everything.

  64. Re:Already done ...in Mexican bathrooms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... just cooling the head by 2-3 degrees celsius (4-5 fahrenheit?) helps a lot in letting a person concentrate"

    I was in Mexico some time ago, in some touristy, but un-air-conditioned bar. It was summer, very hot, and I was very relieved to find that they had large ice blocks placed in each of the heads. I found that it really cuts down on the smell, and does,indeed, help a person concentrate. That particular tank's mission was fulfilled very nicely.

  65. Stillsuits by mnmn · · Score: 1

    Theyre even cheaper on the planet Dune.

    IIRC it recycles your own waste. Great message to send to the troops!

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  66. keep the troops cool... by La+Fourmi+Nihiliste · · Score: 0

    ... redeploy them in michigan: this time of the year, they are bound not to die of heatstrokes.

    ant

  67. Yeah, that's why the Japanese now wear suits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And play baseball.

    And are now a democracy, not an autocratic empire with a warrior caste that fought to the death, including by suicide attacks.

    And them Germans. They've got themselves a democracy, also. Hell, they haven't even invaded France since Russian tanks poured into Berlin and US tanks poured over the Rhine.

    Oh, both places still have US troops deployed in them. 60+ years after the murderous dictators were deposed.

  68. Dump That Money Somewhere else by durrango · · Score: 1

    A fleet of Asimo's fully armed and ARMORED. Bring in the Droids. Why put human life through that.

    1. Re:Dump That Money Somewhere else by durrango · · Score: 1

      PLUS: rotundus.se Already has the basic idea toward the Star Wars "Destroyer" bots.

  69. Overclocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this mean we can overclock our soldiers?

    1. Re:Overclocking by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      Dude, AnandTech's carried articles for years on underclocking our special ops troops, allowing passive cooling, so we can get closer to the goal of a "truly silent soldier." Get with the times!

      Of course, all that extra sound insulation chaffes like a bitch.

  70. lesser evil by DrYak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a doctor and because I happen to live in one of the few last european retard countries that still has moronic stuff like obligatory military service, I had to work in a small military hospital.
    It was summer, it was *very* hot (unussual for this country).

    A few of the young soldiers collapsed because of Hyperthermia during exercices in tanks.
    Not only was the weather hot, but it was even hotter inside the tank (witch is under direct sun, doesn't radiate a lot and doesn't have large openings, to lower risk of detection. These old models don't have AC). With a lot of people wearing a huge amount of clothing and equipment (uniform, armor, harness, ...) trapped in such small confined space, overheating happens very easily.
    Also I don't even mention how some chiefs succeded to fuck up the water supply managment during long marching exercises.

    So : Yes, given such problems with heat, this kind of technology is welcome. Although I'm sure some officiers can still manage to find a way to fuckup and bring more overheated soldiers to the hospital.

    About the Air Conditionning :
    I *think* (it's just quick guestimation) the worst effects of the AC are :
    - because, obviously, they only work inside, when one is going from one place to another, one is constantly alternating hot/freezing environnements. Which isn't good.
    - AC functions by convection (cold air circulation). So you don't get only cold air, but you got actually *cold wind*, which can freeze much more. 18C isn't a cold temperature. But, stong wind blowing at 18C can cool you a lot (surface skin temperature is somewhere near 30C +/- 5C. Don't remember more exact figures), specially if you aren't properly dressed (as everyone dresses on hot days).
    - Near the "wind source", the temperature can be even lower. You can get harmed (or at least sick) if you fall asleep near the AC source. (The exact same opposite as falling asleap to close to the heat source in winter)

    That's why we european have to always take sweatshirts when we travel in the USA, to avoid catching cold because of the strong A/C inside.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:lesser evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's why we european have to always take sweatshirts when we travel in the USA, to avoid catching cold because of the strong A/C inside.

      One of the things I hated about Las Vegas when I was on vacation there was the AC in the casinos. Alternating between 112F outside and maybe 70F inside is rough.

  71. Compay called bioCOOL makes similar suits by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 1

    There is a company called bioCOOL that makes similar cooling suits.

    In my humble opinion, the bioCOOL suits are better.

  72. Ugh by Aaron_Pike · · Score: 1

    One more thing to help put the TARD in TARDEC. *sigh*

    1. Re:Ugh by zoloto · · Score: 1

      haha, that's great man. I almost died laughing. NYC is hell at the moment, no subway etc... :\

  73. Re:Company called bioCOOL makes similar suits by GrassyKnowl · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to a story on the bioCOOL company

    Goto:

    http://www.sarta.org/default/index.cfm

    And click on the "Spacesuit Designer Aims To Take Some Of Heat Out Of Military Life" link.

  74. You should write some Wikipedia revisionism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > And I can think of 30,000 or so people who might agree with it, if they could. Your point?

    And I can think of 3,000 who came before the 30,000 as a consequence of just 19 (terrorists)? And what was your point again? hmmm?

    ...oh wait, lemme guess! terrorism only in Iraq afterwards blah blah blood for oil blah blah UN sanctions work blah blah blah it is better to tuck your penis between the legs blah blah blah

    ...save your disingenuous DNC regurgitations for your googlefried avant-garde hatchlings, dude. It's older and staler than the stains on Lewinsky's dress. In fact, trace the DNA on the dress back to it's source and you'll figure it all out eventually...
    1. Re:You should write some Wikipedia revisionism! by TheMadcapZ · · Score: 1

      Many more Arab civilians died before we got hit as a retaliation for bad US foreign policy. Oh but keep ignoring that fact and blindly follow what your government tells you to.

  75. TARDIS? by roseblood · · Score: 0

    Anyone scan the headlines and see that TARDIS was involved in this story? I clicked the story link, and what do I see?

    The vests were developed by the Army's Tank Automotive Research, Development & Ingineering Senter, known as TARDIS

    --
    There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  76. is the humvee armor is a optional extra? by mikek3332002 · · Score: 1

    if they can spend money on air conditioning/ why not spend armor for the jeep

  77. Now if only.. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

    They could make them smaller, portable, released for civilians, not a bigallion dollars, and maybe throw in some designer colors.

    Then I would consider getting one to wear in my own car.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  78. SEMPER FI! by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

    A great big HOORAH! from a fellow slashdotter in Afghanistan.

    --
    Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
    -- Cicero
  79. hmmmm... this isn't new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    For what it's worth this isn't all that new.

    Canadian helicopter crews used cooling suits in the first gulf war... The suits were jury rigged together by Defence Research and Development of Canada (DRDC) in under a couple of weeks and allowed flight crews to remain in the air for longer periods...

    See the DRDC website at:

    http://www.toronto.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/publications/fa ctsheets/f05_e.html

    The Shearwater Aviation Museam in Halifax has one of the suits on display:

    http://www.toronto.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/publications/fa ctsheets/f05_e.html

    1. Re:hmmmm... this isn't new. by c0rvus · · Score: 1
    2. Re:hmmmm... this isn't new. by jim_deane · · Score: 1

      You're right, it isn't new.

      NASA used liquid cooling garments for temperature control in space suits in the 1960s. They might have been used earlier than that in flight suits for air and space research. You can probably still see one on display at the Kansas Cosmosphere and Space Center's Hall of Space museum.

      Jim

  80. No fraternisation for the troops by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    The US Army will never ever wear iraqi clothes!

    Why?

    Because this will show the US citizen and polticans:
    - the #1 viagra consuming country in the world needs more money to spend to push climate change all over the world.
    - Islam superior to konservative US christianity because weather is against liberators.
    - Super duper expensive high tech cooling gear only second place after traditional desert clothing
    - Wearing the same clothes means fraternisation ==> Fraternisation is forbidden for army personel except in Guantanamo.

    - it's amazing you are still reading my post
    - why?
    - okay nothing more to see move on.
    - hey you are still here!
    - go away or I tell the DHS you are reading slashdot

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  81. tactical gears. by bronney · · Score: 1

    That's because you don't have full gears on. Go to a surplus store and slap all the gulf war tac gears on and try to drive with knee pads, and steer with elbow pads. Then tell me it isn't hot wherever you were.

  82. M-1? M2!! by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    The M-1 (I presume you mean Abrams tank) is fine. It's massively oversized, but if you can get it to the field of battle, the survivability is very appreciated.

    But forget that, we have had some incredible tools for our forces. Like the M2 machine gun.

    John Browning was a brilliant man. The 1911 is 100 years old now, and still an incredible piece of work. And you can own one (well, a replica) for a very affordable price. Any engineer could learn a lot from a study of this invention. (And I don't even own any guns)

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:M-1? M2!! by ivrcti · · Score: 1

      I used the M2 .50 caliber machine gun a lot (on my M-1, back in the day) and loved weapon. As long as you kept the head space set right, it would tear through trucks, walls, trees all day long. The only real problem was that when you crawled up/down the front of the tank, you had to remember that the barrel could be quite hot!

    2. Re:M-1? M2!! by jafac · · Score: 1

      Not a soldier myself - I just have not really read any criticism about the M-1, other than it's terrible fuel economy, and lack of cupholders. Anecdotes of it's performance in the first Gulf War against Saddam's tanks are legendary. I heard talk like "ten M-1's could have defeated both sides in the battle of the Kursk" - mainly based on the accuracy and range of the main gun more than anything else.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  83. For the misinformed by EnigmaticSource · · Score: 4, Informative

    Flack != Bullet-proof;

    A bullet proof jacket is normally made exclusively from layered fabric with an optional flack plate (modern use, older bullet-proof armor was made from solid plate).

    A flack jacket will indeed stop a 7.62 NATO (AK-47) round, as well as a .223 caliber (M16) because, it is made around articulated ceramic/steel plates with a touch of Kevlar fabric to hold it together. My Korean war era flack vests are rated to stop a .50 caliber [from ~100 meters] round (although those are steel), and my lighter composite vests from Vietnam are rated for close range 7.62 NATO (and I'm sure current generation vests are better).

    As for the .223 caliber rounds, they are not steel cored, although the soviet 7.62 NATO rounds were... the reason they penetrate armor so well is their profile, a 53 grain .223 caliber bullet (about the weight of a hollow point 9mm) is long and skinny like a javelin with the impact surface remarkably similar to a .22 caliber round (squirrel/small game munitions). The Small striking surface increases the pressure exerted per square inch creating a higher probability of penetration (fun experiment, buy a Kevlar vest and see if it stops a sharp knife [no, not while it's on someone of course]).

    --
    The Geek in Black
    I know my BCD's (when I'm Sober)
    1. Re:For the misinformed by MoreNoiseThanSignal · · Score: 2, Informative

      uh, for the misinformed:
      7.62 NATO == .308 winchester == 7.62x51 != 7.62x39 (the AK round)
      http://kalashnikov.guns.ru/models/ka50.html
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7.62_x_51_mm

      I'm pretty sure the Soviets were not a part of NATO (being a Warsaw Pact nation) when the 7.62 round was developed, hence they wouldn't adopt it as standard issue. 7.62x39 is much more akin to a 5.56 NATO/.223 round because of the shorter length of the cartridge.

      You sound like you know enough about this stuff that you should know the difference.

      --
      abort, retry, fail?
    2. Re:For the misinformed by TheVision · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... 7.62 NATO (AK-47) round ...

          7.62 NATO (7.62x51) != 7.62 Russian (7.62x39). Why would a Warsaw Pact country use NATO ammunition?

      My Korean war era flack vests are rated to stop a .50 caliber [from ~100 meters] round ...

          I don't know where to start with this one. A flak jacket is designed to stop (relatively slow-moving) fragments from grenades and bombs, not bullets. A .50 BMG round will easily penetrate 1" of concrete at 1,640 yards, and the Raufoss round will penetrate 1" of armor at 2,000 yards.

      As for the .223 caliber rounds, they are not steel cored ... a 53 grain .223 caliber bullet

          First, it's 62 grains, and secondly, it has a steel penetrator. Look up 'M855'.

    3. Re:For the misinformed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enigmatic... Check your facts before spouting off such BS. You clearly have no idea what you are writing about.

      A flak jacket is designed to stop shrapnel, not bullets. Just about anything will tear through a flak jacket. Have a look at this Vietnam issue flak jacket being perforated by pistol rounds...
      http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot15.htm

      Also, the AK 47 fires 7.62x39 not 7.62x51 NATO. There is a big difference in size, energy, velocity, ballistics... AK round is a lead antimony slug with a full metal jacket. The 5.56x45 (M16 round, not civvie .223) green tip used presently is steel cored, and therefore armor piercing.

      Your Korean war era vest is rated to 50 cal? That's interesting, since a 50 will go through a cast iron V-8 engine block... Tell me honestly, have you ever handled or shot a firearm? FPS games do not count:)

    4. Re:For the misinformed by Lobo93 · · Score: 1

      A flak jacket is designed to stop shrapnel, not bullets. Just about anything will tear through a flak jacket. Have a look at this Vietnam issue flak jacket being perforated by pistol rounds...
      http://www.theboxotruth.com/docs/bot15.htm


      +5 informative site! I've thought about doing a similar experiment for some time now, but I can tell by the attention to detail and the range of weapons utilized in the photos, I'll just leave it be.

      Too bad, really! Looks like good fun... ;P

      --
      "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
    5. Re:For the misinformed by monkeydo · · Score: 2, Informative

      As for the .223 caliber rounds, they are not steel cored, although the soviet 7.62 NATO rounds were... the reason they penetrate armor so well is their profile, a 53 grain .223 caliber bullet (about the weight of a hollow point 9mm)

      A 9mm bullet weighs double that. While you might find some specialty 9mm ammo in the 95-100gr range, most commercial hollowpoints are 115-147gr.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    6. Re:For the misinformed by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "Flack != Bullet-proof;" Not going to waste much time here- shoud be: Flack does NOT equal bullet. Look both up in wiki or google. 'nuff said there. "A flack jacket will indeed stop a 7.62 NATO (AK-47) round, as well as a .223 caliber (M16)" Umm, no it will not. Again, check your sources. "As for the .223 caliber rounds, they are not steel cored, although the soviet 7.62 NATO rounds were... the reason they penetrate armor so well is their profile, a 53 grain .223 caliber bullet (about the weight of a hollow point 9mm)" a. Wrong- current m885 round (5.56 NATO) IS stell cored to penetrate light body armor and flack vests. The original 5.56 ball round was copper-tin alloy jacketed boat-tail spire-pointed projectile, then next MAJOR improvement was SS-109 round which was not steel-cored. It started as 69gr. bullet instead of original 55gr. bullet, and had "quicker" rifling twist inside of barrel to increase rate of spin for more stability at longer ranges, with added benefit of better stability (for long range accuracy). This (SS-109) was then reduced to 62gr. (bullet's wt.) due to the lower density of the steel core that was added to help defeat light armor. I did not include links as all of this info is too abundantly available to anyone who cares to check- I don't expect anyone to take an armorer's word for it, check yourself-that's part of the big problem I see here- too many want to read a thread and take that info as true without checking for themselves. If your going to debat/argue a subject, then check for yourself the validity of any "facts" you read!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  84. Who needs air conditioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do like I did for over a year. Drink tonnes of water and sweat your ass off while trying to keep from passing out. In fact, you can make your tea or coffee from your MRE and don't even have to boil the water...how great is that? Yes it does really reach 130 deg. in the summer and durring the heat of mid-day, we are mostly the only idiots running around in it. The Iraqis mostly stay inside for those few peak hours of the day.

  85. Re:Whatever it takes by pomo+monster · · Score: 1, Troll

    Fuck you and fuck off, asshole. My best friend's little brother was killed in the north tower and I don't appreciate you presuming to speak for him, especially when I know where he would stand politically on issues like these, and believe me, that's nowhere near flag-waving rednecks like you.

  86. Chem warfare by Pedals · · Score: 1

    How about cooling vests while wearing personal protective equipmentt for chem warfare? I've thought about fashioning medical cooling packs into a vest to wear underneath my chem warfare suit. You wouldn't believe how hot those suits get when trying to do any kind of work, like lifting patients on a litter. And don't get me started on the 'breathing through a straw' while wearing the gas mask!

  87. Absolutely by kahei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Eventually the individual solders will drift out of the command structure and find that they have to make a seperate peace with the local people.

    Oh yeah, bound to. I mean, it's simply so much easier to just sorta 'drift out of the command structure', desert, change skin color, learn Arabic, and become an Iraqi than it is to finish your tour and go home.

    You may not be aware of this, but as things currently stand:

    --The US Army, as a rule, frowns on soldiers who 'drift out of the command structure'.
    --Iraq, as a rule, does not appear to offer an easy path to a happy and secure life to deserters from occupying armies.

    I agree, though, that if the parent post's sheer naievete could be weaponized, it would be deadly enough to force any of these circumstances to change.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  88. Weather in Iraq by aarku · · Score: 1

    The weather is rather pleasant right now in Baghdad.

  89. STFU murderer by Oldsmobile · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I used to think that US forces were happless victims, poor simple folk who only wanted an education and a job.

    But after reading numerous accounts and opinions by US soldiers on message boards and such, I have come to the opinion, that US soldiers are merely willing mercenaries -blood thirsty ones at that.

    Therefore, I no longer feel bad when I hear US soldiers have been horribly blown up or injured in Iraq. They are occupiers, they are there killing and murdering Iraqis, they shouldn't be there.

    Feeling hot while on a patrol? Sucks to be you.

    Being shot at all the time? You asked for it.

    Getting blown to ragged chuncks of flesh getting to you? Well that's just too bad!

    Of course the bad guys never want to think they are the bad guys. But face it, the US army is being the Nazis right now and anything they have coming to them, they've been asking for.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    1. Re:STFU murderer by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 1

      The following are the words of my good friend and combat veteran, who was reading over my shoulder and insisted on answering your post.

      First and foremost let me explain something to you real fast I joined the United States Army to serve my country not die at the hands of a terrorist. That is who is blowing American soldiers to chunks of flesh, terrorists, the same ones who killed three thousand innocent Americans.

      But I suppose I asked for that too you know so I could kill something. I am a Biomedical Engineer I fix medical equipment. How is that job asking to be shot at and blown up?

      A very good friend of mine who just died, he was a medic he helped people live, and he died for it.

      We didn't ask for it, in fact if you ask my wife and my daughter whether or not I asked for it they will also tell you hell no.

      Its people like you who make me hate what I do, because of the mere fact that me out there getting shot at is what gives you the freedom to run your cowardly mouth at us. I didn't ask to be sent half way around the world from everything I know and love to be shot at living in the back of a truck or just as well under the stars.

      These same people who are shooting at me will eventually be shooting at you or someone you love think about that the next time you bag on the United States Military we are the reason you can surf the internet and flap your very unintelligent gums about things you have no idea.

      Your freedoms came from my blood, my friends' blood, my families' blood.

      As far as acting like Nazis might want to retake High School history and see this one.

      Your post has to be one of the most blatantly ignorant statements I have ever read but it is your opinion, and opinions are like assholes everyone's got one yours just stinks.

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    2. Re:STFU murderer by Oldsmobile · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am sorry if I have trouble understanding why shooting innocent civilians, occupying a foreign country and whinging about how being deservedly shot at has anything to do with my freedom.

      Now, I can understand, if you were saying you got shot by rubber bullets by Jim Crow's goons on a civil rights march. Or got gassed while demanding the government try or release people who have been behind bars for years without trial. Or got shot while fighting for the right of self determination for the retched poor of the earth. I would really respect that, I really would.

      I really, truly could understand your point, if your friend died while really fighting for civil liberties, justice and peace. Instead, you are using those words to justify a war to pacify a country that doesn't want anything to do with you or the US army, and has absolutely nothing to do with any freedoms that Americans or Europeans may or may not have. A country that has fought against it's dicators and occupiers before, and are simply continuing to do so. They have every right to bear arms for self determination.

      In fact, it would be the exact thing that you (or me even) would do if we were in the same situation. You would not for one second suffer a foreign occupation, and would think those not doing anything about it were betraying their country.

      So sorry about your and your friends family, but as I said, the bad guys want, really truly want to think they are fighting for a just cause -I mean, the Nazis thought they were slaughtering Russians for a just cause too.

      But if you think about it, bombing the crap out of a small town in northern Iraq while doing horrible things to the people living there, or say, attacking the Mahdi army in Najaf has absolutely nothing to do with me surfing the web, commenting this post or any of the things you claim to be fighting for.

      So I say again, STFU murderer and take what you have coming for you.

      Perhaps you can vindicate yourself by demanding that (and perhaps fighting for) US troops to go home immediately.

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    3. Re:STFU murderer by rev_g33k_101 · · Score: 0

      I am sorry if I have trouble understanding

      Hey man some of us are just not as educated as others, not your fault. Maybe your folks could have sent you to a better school.

      why shooting innocent civilians, occupying a foreign country and whinging about how being deservedly shot at has anything to do with my freedom.

      oh there was more... let me break this apart for you "shooting innocent civilians" this happens in war, if you had read my previous posts you would see I already addressed this topic.... I will not cover it again. Not my fault you didn't take notes during the last class I gave.

      "occupyinga foreign country" again part of war, probly the biggest part of war, next to the killing of your enamis

      "whining about how being deservedly shot at" not so much whining but reminding the yuppies *nudges you* out there that there are people getting shot at.

      "has anything to do with my freedom." ok we will let the Muslim extremists trounce all over the USA and make your woman cover herself up, not talk unless she's is spoken to, always walk behind you, make you pray to Allah, grow a beard, and stop what your doing at certain times during the day to face Mecca and bow down to it. oooh and lets not forget if you were talking about the new leaders of the USA like you are talking about the soldiers, they would kill you.

      Now, I can understand, if you were saying you got shot by rubber bullets by Jim Crow's goons on a civil rights march. Or got gassed while demanding the government try or release people who have been behind bars for years without trial. Or got shot while fighting for the right of self determination for the retched poor of the earth. I would really respect that, I really would.

      Hmmmmm seams to me that we are giving the "right of self determination" to the people of Iraq......

      I really, truly could understand your point, if your friend died while really fighting for civil liberties, justice and peace

      See answer above

      Instead, you are using those words to justify a war to pacify a country that doesn't want anything to do with you or the US army, and has absolutely nothing to do with any freedoms that Americans or Europeans may or may not have.

      Yes because giving them the right to vote is sooooo pacifying them....
      and just because it has no direct relation to the USA or EU dose not mean that people are not suffering, or are you even more narrow minded then your comments so far have lead me to believe.

      A country that has fought against it's dicators and occupiers before, and are simply continuing to do so. They have every right to bear arms for self determination.

      never mind that most of the average citizens of Iraq come out in to the streets and thank the soldiers, help the soldiers, and welcome the soldiers. Never mind it's only a small fraction of actual Iraq citizens that are currently fighting as the "insurgency". Why do you not hear about these things on the news? Its simple the news must still sell add space, more people watch the news when the news is bad, more people watching more money for the news companies. Talk to a real life actual soldier ask them about the people of Iraq. not on a message board I have ran in to many people that clamed to be US soldiers on message boards, being assholes, then when you ask them questions about there service they don't know anything. Then the truth comes out, they are not soldiers, just people that hate the war and want to give the soldiers bad names.

      In fact, it would be the exact thing that you (or me even) would do if we were in the same situation. You would not for one second suffer a foreign occupation, and would think those not doing anything about it were betraying their country.

      Again I say it is more outside people that have an interest in controlling Iraq then actual citizens of Iraq fighting the US

      So sorry about your and your f

      --
      "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore."
    4. Re:STFU murderer by ThePiMan2003 · · Score: 1

      Ignore the trolls, they are just trying to annoy you.

      The rest of us are glad you are doing a job that we are much to afraid to do ourselves.

      Good luck, and I hope you come home safely soon.

    5. Re:STFU murderer by Oldsmobile · · Score: 0, Troll

      I find it almost cool, that you would start out with a "you are not educated" and then proceed to fill your manic rant with spelling errors.

      Oh, and STFU you murdering Nazi and get the fuck out of Iraq!

      --
      Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
    6. Re:STFU murderer by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "Its people like you who make me hate what I do, ....." Dude- don't go there on account of some uninformed, unexperienced, self-deluding ignorant SOB. Don't forget what started you on this path....it IS worthy and noble in spite of what secluded (living in mom and dad's basement, secure job, etc.) and uninformed reactionists have to say. Sorry to say this, but what we did (and you're doing now) is designed so that even these a**holes can have their say democratically. We that know the score, realize and appreciate your serving in our defense. You have my support for a tough job well done- keep it up! BTW, I heard some of the same s**t when I served in Berlin for USArmy bringing defectors across the border for 3rdArmy 75th Rangers 10th Spl Frcs grp, team 8 back in the early 90's- I came to the conclusion that my concience needed satisfied before I could worry about the rest of the sheeple's view- they weren't there, but I was. I saw the look in some of my "victim's" eyes when they crossed into "Free Territory" (into W.Berlin) and finally realized that they were free from oppression- Would not trade the feeling the look in their eyes gave me for all of the US public opinion in the world- they KNEW they were actually FREE finally! That poster cannot even BEGIN to understand something like this, so- move on- don't get demoralized or bogged down in this senseless diatribe! Again- Thanks from me to you and your "band of brothers" doing a thankless (from the general public) and necessary job- you're heroes in my book!

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  90. not the first armoured vehicles in Persia by fantomas · · Score: 1

    I don't think they will *require* active cooling but I am sure they'll be grateful. There have been armoured vehicles in Iraq /other desert regions before so you don't *need* cooling, but I am sure it makes the ambient temperature less hellish Rolls Royces Armoured cars in Egypt, Persia and the Palestine, the Desert Rats faced the Africa Korps for a few years in North Africa, and the Six Days War to name a few.

  91. Stillsuits? by Oldsmobile · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, the Mahdi Army uses those to wage Jihad.

    --
    Some say he is made with ascii, others that he is eyeballed daily by millions. All we know is, he is known as the Sig
  92. About the banner by enjoyaol · · Score: 1

    Why is Europe in the center of their top banner ? /me going to buy a good life insurance :p

  93. Whoa! I mean... WHOA! by Crouty · · Score: 1
    But with the extra armor and doors closed, temperatures inside the vehicles could reportedly reach more than 130 degrees.
    Oh, you mean Fahrenheit. Never mind.

    In other news, parts of the cooling suits had to be covered up with digital effects.

    --
    On se Internetz nobody noes your German.
  94. Re:Whatever it takes by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    I still wait for martial law to be declared. That would make anti-$sys$liberty terror legislation much easier. Also, there haven't been enough political schenanigans over there lately. Europe demands entertainment! ;)

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  95. Battletech / Mechwarrior by UberHoser · · Score: 0

    Been there done that ! Go FASA !

    'Coolant Vest/Suit; the jumpsuit of mechwarriors specially designed to circulate cool running fluid through the jumpsuit to keep the mechwarrior cool from the heat of the battlemech's reactor'

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
  96. Lack of underwear by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1
    Americans I've known had trouble going without the undies. They just need something tight to squish the package no matter the weather.
    I think it's a cultural thing. Then again, boxers are becoming more popular with current generations. Personally, I like having something extra for the sake of cleanliness. Easier to wash 7 sets of underwear and one set of jeans each week than 7 sets of jeans. I toy with the no underwear bit when in my kilt, but one has to be careful there so as not to give unintentional previews of the wares. *wry grin* Not to mention that a choice breeze when there's kids around could result in me being charged as a registered sex offender...

    As for lack of underwear in the military, my understanding from talking to people in the field is that a lack of underwear is pretty standard, especially in the field. Urine does a good job of reducing the chafing too. Of course, it was a marine who was espousing those benefits...

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
    1. Re:Lack of underwear by mnmn · · Score: 1

      Hell no!

      I wasnt suggesting something like a kilt. Its open underneath. Shalwar Kameez is closed right to the ankles, pretty decent with no chance of wardrobe malfunction. Think of a track suit, but since it doenst hug your body its more comfy.

      When you grow up in that dress in a windy area it doesnt do a thing. In that case, its the western undies which might make you more uncomfortable than originally intended. In a dusty area you have to wash the whole dress frequently anyway, minus the undies theres less to wash in total...

      I guess depends on culture and practicality too. Bummer you can wear that dress downtown NYC... anymore...

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  97. What a bunch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...of whiney pussies.

  98. Cool Suits by Dragunov · · Score: 0

    I served in Iraq in 1991 and regularly faced temperatures exceeding 135 degrees F and it is not good for your health over a long period of time (tends to keep you from having kids). But the low tech solutions seem to work best like drenching an army t-shirt in water and removing your boots to keep cool. When you are near danger it is far safer to close the hatches rather than risk an RPG hit flying into the loader's or TC's hatch. Even miltech offers some interesting applications in civilian life and should not be ignored. I regularly wear gortex lined boots that were originally developed for military use. $5K is a bit much for a suit but when your in the toaster you will do anything to keep cool.

  99. Drinking water by PeterJFraser · · Score: 1

    If I was designing such a system I would use drinking water as the liquid

    1. Re:Drinking water by cool4mojo · · Score: 1

      Why? Drinking water and high temperature = bacteria growth = sick soldiers.

  100. 130? And testing in the winter? by Tolaris · · Score: 1

    How nice. But it is winter right now, so imagine those tests aren't too useful in-theater. Secondly, temperatures in the shade in August reach over 140 degrees. If they think 130 is hot, they don't have a clue what hot really is.

    Disclosure: I am not a soldier. I lived as a civilian in Baghdad for two years, 2003-2005.

  101. Making soliders more attractive targets? by screaser · · Score: 1

    This is somewhat tangential, but does anyone else worry that by giving each soldier more and more gear such as these cooling suits, helmets with wireless HUDs, etc we make them more attractive targets?

    I recall reading somewhere that by 2020 the average US soldier will carry something like $50,000 of (mostly high tech) gear each.

    OK, it's bad that we have to send them where people will try to kill them... but setting up a situation where people will try to kill them just to take (and sell/use) all their high tech stuff seems like it could be even worse.

    1. Re:Making soliders more attractive targets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Baghdad, they'll be lucky to make it out of downtown Detroit :/

      "Sarge! I'm getting mugged!"

  102. Flak by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Aren't flak jackets, by definition, just supposed to stop shrapnel? That seems a far cry from stopping bullets...

    1. Re:Flak by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Ding ding ding!

      You win the prize. It's unfortunate that more people don't come to this entirely logical conclusion. A lot of people see "flak jacket" and immediately assume that it has the magic powers of a "bullet-proof vest" (as if such a thing existed).

      I found a summary of information on the armor currently being used. The good ones are the Interceptor system, which are the ones I was describing with a lightweight vest and then trauma plate inserts. With plates inserted it weighs 16.4 pounds, without plates 8.4 pounds. The vest itself will stop a 9mm Parabellum handgun round (and assorted shrapnel, which is a good thing given that bombs seem to be popular with the enemy over there), the plates are necessary for it to stop a rifle bullet. It's manufactured by Point Blank Body Armor of Oakland Park, FL.

      The less pleasant ones to wear are the older, much heavier and thicker Vietnam era flak vest. Apparently these were being issued to some people (who on paper were in combat-support roles where they wouldn't be as at-risk, I think, but reality disagreed) when there weren't enough Interceptor vests to go around. It was truly a "flak vest" and wasn't really intended to stop aimed weapons fire, in the same way that the old steel pot helmet couldn't stop a bullet either, but was worn for secondary protection. I think this is the one. Having personally worn one, it's a bitch.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Flak by i+chose+quality · · Score: 1
      "the magic powers of a "bullet-proof vest" (as if such a thing existed)"

      ask bart simpson. he has a bullet-proof t-shirt.
      --
      the computer is online
      i am not at it
      what a waste of ressources
  103. American Troops by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
    Don't American troops have notoriously little success getting along with indigenous populations? That's barring a few special circumstances, like cities that have just been liberated from Nazis and stuff like that.

    I'm pretty sure that Canadian soldiers get some training on how to get along with locals, which has definitely aided the success of Canadian peace-keeping missions under the NATO umbrella. Do American soldiers get this? Given the amount of "liberating" they do, it seems like something they would really benefit from. If teaching the marines to be polite prevents even one annoyed jerk from turning insurgent, it would be worth it.

    1. Re:American Troops by jskiff · · Score: 1

      Don't American troops have notoriously little success getting along with indigenous populations?

      Not that I've heard. I would guess that US troops are just like any other people: some get along well with people they don't know, and some of them don't.

      --
      It's "no one," not "noone." Who the hell is noone anyway?
    2. Re:American Troops by Shihar · · Score: 1

      No, Americans have about as much success as any army of a democracy getting along with the natives, if not a little more success then others. The fact that American occupation forces tend to leave fairly quickly or at least go hold up on a base and stop all operations inside of that nation (South Korea, Germany, exc.) minimizes the antagonism compared to say when an Israeli occupation force shows up. You know that if the Americans show up, they are already thinking about getting the fuck out. Coming from a multi-ethnic nation as a multi-ethnic army also offers an extra layer of tolerance against racism. That isn't to imply it doesn't happen, just that Americans tend to be more fortified against it then an ethnically homogenous nation's army.

      The only people that really excel above and beyond the US as occupiers are the British. The British excel because they have had centuries of experience administrating many large and powerful colonial governments that ruled over natives. The British have learned how to be overlord and keep the natives pissed off level down to a minimum.

      In the opening months of the war, there was a stark contrast between the British occupied areas and the American occupied areas. The largest issue is not so much that the Americans or British are brutal as occupiers. Both are well disciplined armies that try and refrain harming civilians.

      The key difference is that when the Americans showed up in a city, they had no fucking clue what to after all the enemies were killed. They didn't know how to bring law and order. They didn't know who to talk to about setting up a new city government. They didn't know what to fix first to keep the civilian population happy. Hell, they didn't even know how to run a roadblock.

      There is more then one horrific story about how US marines and army men were told to set up a roadblock by the higher levels. The problem was that no one knew how to set up a roadblock. In the first few weeks of the war the US inflicted horrific civilian causalities because of poorly designed road blocks. They would just throw a few vehicles across the road, try and wave people down to stop, then panic and open fire on those who suddenly accelerated. As it turns out, seeing as US roadblock, panicking, and accelerating, and subsequently getting shot by US military who thought they were under attack as a very common reaction from Iraqi civilians. It wasn't until weeks later that they learned how to set up barricades to forces cars to slow down.

      The British on the other hand had done this all before and knew exactly what they were doing. The British army is well designed to fight in their former colonies against an army mixed with the non-combatants. The US army on the other hand was an army designed to fight in the open fields of Germany against a massive Russian army with every sane civilian having long since fled the area.

      If there is a morbid silver lining to the Iraq war, it is that the US is becoming very skilled at acting as an occupation army with hostile insurgents mixed within the population. If the Iraq war was to happen again tomorrow, the US would probably be just as skilled as the British in dealing with civilians on the battlefield.

    3. Re:American Troops by rts008 · · Score: 1

      Well said- wish I had mod points to back that congrat's up with instead of hollow words! Having relatives/friends in Iraq talk about how rewarding the experience has been for them helping the people- not former admin or seemingly VERY minority oppostion factions- all they talk about is the welcoming/appreciation they recieve for toppling the Saddam regime. And no, they are not happy about the current unrest, but overall seem to be hopeful of the future- that they did not have with Saddam in power. I wish we were out of there, but from what I've heard, some are grateful we went there, maybe that makes it worthwhile in the long run. (since this is /. I'll now adjust tinfoil hat and hitch up my asbestos underwear!)

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    4. Re:American Troops by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      You're comparing Apples and Oranges - Britian has had an easier time of it specifically because they were given less volatile cities. Obviously if the US and the UK were equally willing to occupy cities, but the UK was better at it, the UK would have been the ones to occupy contested cities such as Baghdad. Instead, they chose to occupy Shi'ite and Kurdish majority cities that were less ethnically divided and less hostile to the Occupation

      I seriously doubt the UK's experience in running a colonial empire 70+ years ago is a major asset in the current struggles in Iraq. How does that make any sense. UK Naval Officers aren't especially proficient in anal sex or hording their rum rations, which went along with their empire experience.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
  104. I think you are misinformed. by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sorry, but I have to call you out on this.

    I don't know what kind of "flack jacket" you're talking about that's comprised of "rticulated ceramic/steel plates with a touch of Kevlar fabric to hold it together" but it's nothing that I've ever seen. And a flak jacket from the Korean war, that was rated to stop a .50 BMG? That's ridiculous. There isn't any type of personal body armor that will stop a 50-cal, even today (unless you consider an armored vehicle a form of personal body armor).

    I'll refer you over to the Body Armor page at Globalsecurity.org. "The [pre-Interceptor] "flak jacket," constructed of ballistic nylon, provided protection primarily from munitions fragments and was ineffective against most pistol and rifle threats. These vests also were very cumbersome and bulky and were restricted primarily to military use." This adequately describes the vests used up through Vietnam and which were even issued during the onset of the current war in Iraq. On the Interceptor system, which is current issue, "The outer tactical vest consists of a Kevlar weave that's very fine and will stop 9mm pistol rounds. Webbing on the front and back of the vest permits attaching such equipment as grenades, walkie-talkies and pistols. The Small Arms Protective Insert (SAPI) is made of a boron carbide ceramic with a spectra shield backing that's an extremely hard material. It stops, shatters and catches any fragments up to a 7.62 mm round with a muzzle velocity of 2,750 feet per second."

    The old, Vietnam-era vest would not stop a 7.62mm rifle round. Whether it would stop a 9mm handgun round I'm not sure, but there are plenty of reports of guys being killed by being shot through the flak vest. It was never intended to stop aimed rifle fire. And it certainly wasn't made from hinged solid plate! Here's a page with a photo. It was made primarily of nylon.

    That the new armor system -- with plates -- can reliably stop rifle rounds is a big deal. It was not true before; I do not believe there was a personal armoring system available to the average troops in any war before this one, that would stop bullets. The WWII, Korea, and Vietnam "flak jackets" were exactly that -- to stop flak, that is, fragments produced by things exploding.

    You are also mistaken about the 5.56mm round. It does too have a steel penetrator. Nonwithstanding my personal experience (fire one through several layers of 1/4" mild steel plate separated by a few inches and you can see the copper jacket and lead surround strip off, and the steel core continue), there are an abundance of references on the net. The current issue is called the M885 Ball round, it is a 62 grain bullet with a full copper jacket and lead surrounding a cylindrical steel core. It's commonly referred to as "Green tip" because the tips of the bullets are painted green to differentiate them from the older, solid-lead M193 round, which has no coloring on the tips.

    You can get quite an argument going with people familiar with terminal ballistics by asking about whether the wound profile of the new M855 bullets (they're quite a bit messier than the old solid lead ones) are due to the bullets 'tumbling,' or breaking apart on impact, but it's quite well known that they have a steel penetrator, and that this was introduced principally to defeat new types of body armor. The Russians have a comparable cartridge, for similar reasons. (Best reference: http://matrix.dumpshock.com/raygun/basics/pmrb.htm l)

    Also read:
    http://www.geocities.com/odjobman/r1r42.htm
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/lib

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  105. Ahh.. by Ligur · · Score: 1

    So THAT's why the Breen wear those suits despite their planet being temperate.
    Anybody?
    Aw, crap. Next time I'll pull a reference to TNG.

    --
    Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.
  106. Re:Lack of underwear/jock rot/staying cool by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    Chaffing between the legs, commonly known as "jock-rot", is extremely unpleasant and painful.
    Petroleum jelly (e.g. Vaseline - TM) applied on the fleshy bits that rub against each other will help a great deal. (between legs and testicles, (if you have them), and between the buttocks - no jokes please). Small tins are available for protecting lips. These weigh hardly anything and can save you from a lot of suffering. Beware of talc. Talc may be okay for feet but it can make jock-rot worse. If you inadvertantly mix talc with petroleum jelly you get a very fine grinding paste. Trust me - it rubs away the outer skin between the legs - very nasty!

    On the subject of staying cool, a shemargh is brilliant. The native populace developed this clothing over centuries. You can use it too. Beware of wiping off sun protection cream. A walking stick strap or rubbing your face with the back of your hand will reduce or remove sun protection. Take care to reapply protective cream unless you want a nasty burn.

    You might be able to walk around topless in Brittany (France) with care (I'm not recommending this). I found bare arms in the San Francisco Giants baseball stadium got painfully burned red during a game. All for the sake of not digging out some sun protection cream. (Well I was going to dig it out but we were in a hurry..)

    Lightweights (green) were okay at around 90 deg F but I can't say how they cope in 130 deg F at blocking out IR and UV. I was extremely impressed with a long sleeve Lowe Alpine dry flo TM vest. Although it was black, it was amazingly effective at keeping the sun off and regulating body temperature. At night it was just a case of putting on a goretex jacket and a balaclava helmet while walking.

    When active systems fail, you need to rely on passive systems. Keep it simple.

    Re wearing a kilt - it might be good for catching locusts...

    Don't even think about wearing a kilt in the area of Tyndrum in Scotland. The midges there don't know that jungle formula insect repellant is supposed to ward them off. If you happen to go camping there, make sure you have mosquito mesh in your tent. If you go walking there , take a mosi neat to wear over your head.

    Cheers!

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  107. Seems like they took the complicated route.. by Venim · · Score: 0

    Why not just add air conditioning to the vehicles? Would probably be cheaper too....

  108. headline depression by thoughtlover · · Score: 1

    The last three headlines, including this one:

    U.S. Army Testing Personal Cooling Suits
    The Future of Tech And NSA Wiretaps
    Xbox Modders Charged Under DMCA

    There seemed to be something depressing when I saw all three of them in a row.

    Whedon Calls Death Knell For Firefly

    That's got to hurt, too.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  109. working inside an auto factory not in Michigan by Phist · · Score: 1

    Detroit is no longer the capital of the automobile manufacturing universe.

    Jason Vines - Chrysler Group Vice President of Communications

    "Okay..let's try this one more time. There is no Big Three. The Chrysler Group is a unit of a company based in Germany. That leaves two auto companies with headquarters in the U.S., and none of them is us. I've been pounding away at this for a year and yet some publications can't seem to purge this outdated term from their vocabularies.
    In today's Detroit Free Press, the lead story contained a sub-headline shouting "Ford, Chrysler and GM skid toward a 50 percent market share."

    Sure. If you lump us all together it's technically accurate, but unfair. The fact is, only GM and Ford have lost market share this year. The Chrysler Group's U.S. share has actually increased a full half-point in November. While the other guys are cutting plants and jobs, we've secured the future of plants in Belvidere, Ill., Sterling Heights, Mich., and Toledo, Ohio, while opening a new joint venture global engine plant in Dundee, Mich. Are we becoming leaner at the same time? Yup. But that only adds to our profitability and productivity.

    Should we be mentioned as a member of group to which we don't belong? Nope. Now let's look at the nonsense splashed across the pages of the Chicago Tribune. That paper's headline screams "Big Three's Pain Ripples Across the Midwest."
    Pain? The only pain here is the extra effort it might have taken to get it right. In all fairness, the headline writer had no choice but to use the lazy, unfair shortcut since the story's two writers took well advantage of using it five times in the body of the story.

    Now ditto to everything I said above regarding the Free Press's transgression, but I should point out to the Trib you might want to take a look about an hour up the road from your Michigan Avenue newsroom--the Belvidere Assembly is right in your backyard. The workers there who will enjoy continued employment building great products might be wondering exactly what pain you're speaking of.

    So what's it going to take to erase the term from the lexicon? The Men in Black are way too busy to neuralize everyone, so I'll just have to trust you."

  110. Re:Whatever it takes by Alaska+Jack · · Score: 1

    Quite clearly, my point was that we had 3,000 people who were not in fact able to "return home safely" despite the fact that "we" hadn't "declar[ed] war on people."

    I guess you could say the GP is technically correct if you restrict his/her use of "them" to mean American soldiers, and not civilians. Our soldiers would indeed "return home safely" if we never used them to fight. But so what? The job of a soldier is not to be safe -- it is to put himself or herself in harm's way to protect American lives and interests. The GP's post was labeled "insightful" despite having nothing to say about whether the troops *should* be fighting. I don't get it -- what's insightful about pointing out that being a soldier is dangerous?

          - AJ