Slashdot Mirror


Is Cash No Longer Legal Tender?

An anonymous reader asks: "I attend the University of Illinois at Chicago. Last semester my housing arrangements went smoothly. I put down my application fee, and my deposit just fine, got a room for the semester and life went on. This semester, because there was supposedly a large number of students who did not check into their rooms last semester, we were required to make a $100 prepayment, in addition to the application fee and deposit. No problem, I think, I see the university is trying to make a quick buck off people who don't follow through with their plans. Now I do NOT have a checking account, a credit card, or anything. I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash. However, they refused to take the cash. Is it legal for a state-owned university, let alone any business to not take legal tender?" The housing department also will not charge my university account (so I can pay the bursar or whoever I need to) in cash, and they want a check or money order. Nowhere in their letter did they say that. I fear out of technicality I am going to loose my housing since I cannot get them their money on time because they do not take cash.

What can I do?"

719 comments

  1. In some cases.... by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My understanding of the issue, although I do not specialize in this kind of law, is that your cash must be accepted for everything for which the good or service has already been provided; they are not required to accept it when you are making a payment for something you are to receive in the future.

    --
    "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    1. Re:In some cases.... by Endymion · · Score: 1

      to add to those thoughts:

      I believe I've heard somewhere the theory of "Ok, yes, we have to take the cash, but I also don't have to make change for you." This may make it highly annoying to use cash in some situations.

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    2. Re:In some cases.... by HaeMaker · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are correct sir. See US Treasury site:

      http://www.treas.gov/education/faq/currency/legal- tender.shtml

      Only creditors have to take legal tender, so if you pay first, they can place restrictions on form of payment.

    3. Re:In some cases.... by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 1

      Whatever the amount of payment, I think that they are allowed to check your credit history. In particular, they are allowed to refuse to sign a long-term contract if you don't have any credit history. But I think that you're right, once you get past that (maybe by having someone back you up), they have to accept cash.

      IANAL, of course.

      I actually had the inverse problem some years ago. My landlord got burned by bounced checks (not from me), so he accepted nothing but cash. Every month, I had to go to the ATM and carry large amounts of money in the street, which I didn't like. I can't imagine not using the banks nowadays, I think you are underestimating their usefulness.

    4. Re:In some cases.... by lorcha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My landlord got burned by bounced checks (not from me), so he accepted nothing but cash.
      Damn, what's that idiot going to do when he gets mugged for the $10,000 cash he's carrying around? What form of payment will he accept, then?

      Somebody better tell that guy about cashier's checks and money orders, pronto!
      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
    5. Re:In some cases.... by simm1701 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That probably what he told you, however if he only accepts payment in cash the most common reason is that he will only declare 1/2 - 3/4 of it as the actual income from rent and pocket the rest.

      Cash is nice and untraceable like that

      --
      $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    6. Re:In some cases.... by UnHolier+than+ever · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. But rent was cheap, and I didn't "officially" know.....

    7. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coinage Act of 1965 - Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues.

    8. Re:In some cases.... by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then bring them the requested amount (+-3%) in pennies. "I can be an asshole too, sir."

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:In some cases.... by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Every time cash&money comes up on slashdot, I get to read these unbelievable things.. what's wrong with transferring money directly from one account to another?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    10. Re:In some cases.... by zootm · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Then bring them the requested amount (+-3%) in pennies. "I can be an asshole too, sir."

      I don't know if that's legal in the US, but here (Scotland) one can refuse cash payment if the amount of change given is unreasonable. I think there might even be a legal definition of what "reasonable" is.

    11. Re:In some cases.... by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      here (Scotland) one can refuse cash payment if the amount of change given is unreasonable
      were you told this by a lawyer, or a bus driver??

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    12. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what he's trying to do... transfer money from his mattress account...

    13. Re:In some cases.... by zootm · · Score: 1

      A student of law, along with the fact that it's a common "pub trivia" thing for people to bring up. I'm really not sure of the legal status, though.

    14. Re:In some cases.... by oggiejnr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is UK law that there is a maximum that can be paid with each value of coin. See question 12 of http://www.royalmint.com/RoyalMint/web/site/Corpor ate/Home/Corp_faq.asp

    15. Re:In some cases.... by koogydelbbog · · Score: 1

      from wikipedia (for england):

      "Currently, 20 pence pieces and 50 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 10 pounds; 5 pence pieces and 10 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 5 pounds; and 1 penny pieces and 2 pence pieces are legal tender in amounts up to 20 pence."

      but scotland is different, yes.

    16. Re:In some cases.... by zootm · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking of, thanks. :)

    17. Re:In some cases.... by ayana · · Score: 1

      I have once (in England) had to pay a £3 bus fair in 1 and 2 penny coins. The bus driver was certainly annoyed (and annoyed that i accidentally gave 3p too much) but he let me on...they've also let me on when I've been 2p short one time...so seems the bus drivers can be flexible about the issue, shame if the same can't be said for a university.

      --
      http://xmoogle.org
    18. Re:In some cases.... by zootm · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking of, it's probably the same or very close here. Thanks :)

    19. Re:In some cases.... by It+doesn't+come+easy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this was not actually paying in advance since he was required to pay by the institute at that point in time. Calling it a "prepayment" does not make it a "payment before services are rendered". If it were then he could choose to pay the $100 at a later time. Or so it seems to me.

      --
      The NSA: The only part of the US government that actually listens.
    20. Re:In some cases.... by Pen420 · · Score: 1

      A similar situation happened at a local business selling furniture. They refused cash, and would accept payment by only credit card, debit, or check. They stated their reason for doing this was to avoid making themselves a potential target for thieves. I don't know if each state is different, but in Idaho, any business that refuses legal US Tender, is in danger of losing their license. Maybe universities and such are exempt from this, but a business must accept cash or be in danger of losing their license.

    21. Re:In some cases.... by milamber3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The link you posted states that private companies may choose not to accept some forms of legal tender. I suspect it specifically mentions private business because publicly funded institutions, such as the school in question, are required to accept ALL forms of legal tender.

    22. Re:In some cases.... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I've had disgruntled ex-tenants threaten to pay their judgments off in pennies before. No one's actually done it yet. I doubt they even got so far as researching just how much it would cost to ship that many pennies to the PO box.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    23. Re:In some cases.... by cecille · · Score: 1

      Canada has this coin restriction too. (http://www.canlii.org/ca/sta/c-52/sec8.html)

      Actually used this once because my condo corp. is absolutely insane (long story), so I decided to pay them in change one time. They were not pleased. On the other hand, they do have the right to refuse to take cash in Canada anyway (http://www.bank-banque-canada.ca/en/banknotes/law .html - on the right).

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    24. Re:In some cases.... by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I doubt it's true here in the US. Those pizza guys in college would have refused us already. Never underestimate the lengths a bunch of broke college kids will go through for a pizza ($5 for a large on Tuesdays, and that would feed 3 of us :)). A number of times we paid in dimes and/or quarters for the whole thing :).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    25. Re:In some cases.... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      What is wrong is that he doesn't have one of the accounts and doesn't prefer to get one. In which I'm one of these people too. I do have a checking account and a debit card that would work as a credit card but I live by the "in god we trust, all other pay cash" theory. And I'm a firm believer that if you cannot pay cash, you probably can't afford it anyways.

      The only thing I see wrong with this idea is that some companies refuse to do anything that doesn't effect their banking interest.

    26. Re:In some cases.... by Applekid · · Score: 1

      There is no federal mandate. A publicly funded school is at the state level (but can accept federal money in form of grants and scholarships), which means it's probably up to the state to determine.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    27. Re:In some cases.... by KeatonMill · · Score: 1

      Just as federal money for roads is dependent upon a state having a certain drinking age, the feds can impose quite a lot of rules on public universities.

    28. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA did not mention money orders. Since the school accepts checks, they accept money orders. Anyone can get one of these at any bank and many stores, and stay off the grid. That should meet the needs of Author Of TFA.

      Another possibility is that unless AOTFA is pathologically antisocial, there must be someone in his friendship circle who would be willing to write the check in exchange for his cash.

      I don't think University of Illinois at Chicago is being unreasonable about this. In situations where there is a significant crime risk, the cost of protecting and managing a pile of cash can be significant. For instance, the campus I work at is a division of a community college that serves mostly adult students whose fees are paid through contractual arrangements with agencies and non-profits (we provide GED, ESL, job training courses, and similar assistance in finding employment). We have a few self-pay students. They are required to pay by check or by money order. We do not accept credit cards and we cannot afford the kind of changes in the front office that we would need if we were to accept cash. We would need a better safe, a locking cash drawer, and an office arrangement that discouraged robberies and protected our office personnel. That doesn't work for us.

      As an aside, unless AOTFA has some really strong reason for staying off the grid, I would advise him to get a checking account and a credit card, and begin to establish a credit history. By the time a student graduates from college, he should have at a minimum a history of 36 months of regular credit card usage with full payment of the debt each month. It doesn't matter so much whether his monthly bill is $50 or $500; what matters is being able to show 3+ years of successful credit management. AOTFA could maintain a checking account balance of only $100 or so, and use his credit card only at the grocery store, and gain the benefits of having a good credit history. This small amount will not reduce the flash value of the wad of bills he must be carrying in his pocket, nor will it interfere with his bling.

      A true measure of a person's economic success is whether he can walk into a new car dealership, say "I want that one," and put it on his credit card. Flash and bling are for kids, not for men and women who are going places and doing things.

    29. Re:In some cases.... by rcamera · · Score: 1

      And I'm a firm believer that if you cannot pay cash, you probably can't afford it anyways

      1) so if i have a large (interest bearing, of course) checking account but choose not to carry large amounts of cash, i can't afford anything?
      2) is there something wrong with putting something on plastic and getting all kinds of fun rewards if i can cover it when the cc bill comes in?
      3) have you ever paid `cash' for a car? i always found it easier to write a check rather than walk into the bank and withdraw $30k+. besides, the salespeople get awfully suspicious when i walk in with a breifcase full of $100 bills...

      --
      Wave upon wave of demented avengers March cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream
    30. Re:In some cases.... by HullBreachOnline.com · · Score: 0

      Iran into a problem like this with my old apartment. I withdrew cash from my bank account, thinking that they wouldn't accept a debit/card card like my past apartment. Then I had to turn that cash into a money order before they would take it. (They did accept debit/credit cards after all.)

      I came to the conclusion that it's not so much cash not being treated as a legal form of tender, but it seems places like this may have a lack of trust for their employees. If you think about it, anyone can use cash that is stolen from the till, but a check, money order, cashier's check, or credit card, can only be charged directly to the company's account. Thus, devious employees cannot obtain more than their minimum wage paychecks when large sums of money are paid for rent, security deposits, and such.

    31. Re:In some cases.... by rblancarte · · Score: 1

      You can go with this theory all you want. The fact is that at times, you are going to have to play by other people's rules. This is why I would say this guy should just buck up and get a bank account of some sort. This is simply the beginning of problems for this guy, and if he doesn't learn to deal/adapt, he is going to have problems the rest of his life (and probably not just with financial matters).

      And you know there are advantages to paying by means other than cash. I use nothing but plastic. I run up my CC bills each month, pay them off at the end of the month and then rack up reward points. It works great.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
    32. Re:In some cases.... by Surt · · Score: 1

      I'm fairly sure the grandparent meant cannot pay cash, not do not pay cash.
      Oh, those are the actual words he used.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    33. Re:In some cases.... by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      And I'm a firm believer that if you cannot pay cash, you probably can't afford it anyways.

      And I am an even firmer believer that this is a bad ogical error brought by bouts of elitism and zeal.. there I go making it sound like a bad case of diarrhea again, excuse me.


      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    34. Re:In some cases.... by shagan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a friend that decided that $100 worth in pennies was the best way to pay a fine to the local government for something he didn't agree with. They instituted mandatory garbage pickup for every home at $10 a month. My friend lived next door to the dump and would just collect his garbage in a barn and take it over to the dump each month for $5. He refused to pay extra money based on the principal of the thing. They fined him for refusing to pay for garbage collection. So, to pay the fine he went and got $100 worth of pennies from the bank and unwrapped all of them. Took them to the local government and poured them out on the collections desk. The lady behind the desk just laughed at him and refused to accept the pennies and he refused to pay with anything but the pennies.

      Local sherrif hauls him into court a couple of weeks later for failure to pay. My friend contends he was willing to pay. The judge asks my friend to show him a dollar and has him read the front where it says, "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private". Then he asked my friend to find that phrase on his pennies. It is not there. Judge then ordered my friend to pay the bill (plus court costs of $50) in cash or go to jail. My friend payed the fine plus the court costs in cash.

      He then took the pennies back to the bank to get his $100 back and the bank refused to accept them unrolled, so my friend spent the next few days rolling pennies.

    35. Re:In some cases.... by HanClinto · · Score: 1

      I run up my CC bills each month, pay them off at the end of the month and then rack up reward points. It works great.

      I used to follow this pattern as well, but then I realized what I'm actually doing.

      Credit card companies take a decent chunk of change from every credit card transaction (some are %3, others such as Discover and AmEx are higher). However, I don't think that CC companies allow merchants to charge higher prices for credit-card transactions -- this is why you don't usually see surcharges for using a CC.

      So by me using a credit card for everything, I'm essentially forcing mom-and-pop shops to artificially raise all of their prices %3-5 percent.

      And what does it get me? Around half a percent "cash back". I'm not gaining that 0.5% -- I'm in fact losing around 3.5% (all of which goes to the credit card companies, not even to the local brick-and-mortar stores).

      So lately I've been bucking that system, realizing that rewards points aren't doing me (or my local stores) any favors. Sure, my single usage probably won't make too much of a difference, but I'm trying to put my money where my mouth is, and vote with my dollar.

      Your mileage may vary. This is just where I've come to.

      --clint

    36. Re:In some cases.... by pla · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with transferring money directly from one account to another?

      Because you literally only need a routing number and account number to make transactions to and from that account. Once I give you those (which happen to appear on every check), you basically have the same level of control over the contents of that account as do I.

      Now, if you fraudulently (or as most companies perfer to call it, "erroneously") empty my account on a whim, I need to notice the problem and either get you to admit a problem exists, or sue you for what you took. In the mean time, guess who gets nailed with all the bounced check fees against that account?


      So yeah, I most certainly do have a problem not only with directly using financial accounts for any form of payment, but merely with using checks in general. Credit cards at least have some protection (in that I can trivially dispute the charge and the burden of proof then rests on the one who placed the charge), but checking accounts have almost none.

      With cash, none of these problems exist. I can, completely anonymously, pay you $50 for your goods or services, and that ends the transaction forever, no possibility of after-the-fact fraud on either side.



      In this specificcase, however, the school did say they'd take a money order, which seems (IMO) a satisfactory compromise. In exchange for spending an extra $0.85 for the money order, the FP author can stand by his preference not to have a CC or checking account.

    37. Re:In some cases.... by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      I've thought about that, and you're right, but there are substantial costs associated with transferring cash, too. (Armored car, trips to bank, clerk error, etc.)

      And in order for that 3% surcharge to go away (and it's not quite that high) everyone would have to stop using credit cards. If you're the only one paying cash, you don't get the rewards, and you won't be making enough of a difference to lower prices, either.

      The CC companies have forced themselves into a nice position.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    38. Re:In some cases.... by alta · · Score: 1

      Agreed,

      I'm sure this has been said by now, but here I go anyway.
      Hotels and Car Rental places do not take cash. Often they won't even take a DEBIT card, only a true credit card. WHY? Because if you trash their property they want a method to take you for all they can. They'll charge the card up to the limit to try to get their money. If you paid with cash, they can't do this. If you paid with a DEBIT they can't do it nearly as much. Most people have a much less cash in their checking than they have credit on a Credit card. I understand why they do this, they don't want someone paying cash, using a fake name, pretending their a rock star in their hotel and leaving before anyone has seen the damage done. Is this legal? I can't say for sure, but I bet if it wasn't it wouldn't have gone on so long. And in your dorm situation, you're staying in their hotel.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    39. Re:In some cases.... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Good analysis, although it's really the cash payers who are eating the cost of the subsidy. They are also paying the higher prices but without the rewards.
      There's an arguement that cash sales have costs as well (you have to protect the cash) and there's a non-insignificant amount of float required to make change), and with pay point stations, I think credit transactions are now much faster than other payment forms. So I'm not sure the all in cost of a credit transaction is that much higher than other payment forms.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    40. Re:In some cases.... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well that's pretty ridiculous- if you had to pay a $100,000 penalty and you tried to pay it in ones, the judge would just make up a different excuse not to accept it. The reason it's not written on the penny is because there's not enough room on the penny and besides it's laws that back currency, not the writing on the currency itself.

    41. Re:In some cases.... by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      Because you literally only need a routing number and account number to make transactions to and from that account. Once I give you those (which happen to appear on every check), you basically have the same level of control over the contents of that account as do I.
      What bank is this that fulfills wire transfer requests without authentication?
      --
      (IANAL)
    42. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cash situation: In my experience, the only reason to refuse cash is a fear of corrupted employees. They are afraid someone will discreetly put a few hundreds in their pocket when no one is looking.

      Cash only: I am usually a lot more concerned of "cash only" businesses, as these are usually fronts for money laundering. A big case in my area was a video store, magically creating fake rentals, and deposing the cash with the other rentals money.
      Unlike yuur sugestion, the revenue was fully declared, tax payed and an organized crime boss enjoying lundered money.

    43. Re:In some cases.... by HanClinto · · Score: 1

      there are substantial costs associated with transferring cash, too. (Armored car, trips to bank, clerk error, etc.)

      You're very right about that -- my wife has taken to using a debit card rather than a credit card -- it still has the convenience of the electronic transaction, but it cuts out one of most expensive middle men. We haven't (yet) cut up our credit cards -- I still use them when they're convenient. I guess the larger change for me is that I no longer try to use credit cards whenever I can -- I've reduced my CC usage to be only when another option would be too inconvenient, and I've cut down on my usage of my AmEx -- even though it gives me a *slightly* higher reward percentage-wise, I understand that it's considerably harder on my local merchants.

      And in order for that 3% surcharge to go away (and it's not quite that high) everyone would have to stop using credit cards. If you're the only one paying cash, you don't get the rewards, and you won't be making enough of a difference to lower prices, either.

      You're right -- I just looked it up, and my 3% guess was a bit high. Seems like Visa/MC are around %2-ish, but the other ones (Discover/AmEx) still being higher. You're also right that if I'm the only one paying cash, then I'm losing out on the half a percent. My consolidation is that at least the other 2%-5% is going back into my local town's economy, rather than off to the CC companies.

      *shrug* Nothing huge, but I'm just trying to do my part. As I'm growing up, I'm just coming to realize more and more that there really ANSTAAFL, and the "cash back rewards" thing doesn't ultimately help me nearly as much as the CC companies would like me to believe.

    44. Re:In some cases.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They require a credit card for security, but they will accept cash or a debit card for the actual payment. Even for security, most places will accept a cash deposit but it happens so infrequently you'll probably have to do lots of talking.

    45. Re:In some cases.... by alta · · Score: 1

      True, I forgot that in each case I would give a credit card, but after the stay or rental I would actually pay for it on the debit. But they keep that credit card so they can run it up if the property was trashed.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    46. Re:In some cases.... by dknj · · Score: 1

      You have zero clue how banks work. Ever wonder why you just have to give your bank and routing number to setup automated drafts from your bank for your credit card/cable/etc.? They can either submit an image of the check electronically to your bank or they can print out a paper check which doesn't have your john hancock, but a message that says "Authorized by Account Owner".. guess what, your bank will take both. While your bank has just drafted money you were not expecting to be withdrawn, each of those 7-11 trips, movie and gas purchases on your check card are now picking up a hefty $30 fee because you overdrew your account. Now you have no money and have to wait until after the lawsuit to get your money back. Oh yea, your bank won't help you.

      Now there are methods to stop this, such as telling the bank to only allow a certain amount to be withdrawn via check per day.. but again there are ways around it. Check fraud is still common and easy. I will share one. Tell someone to put a stop on a check they gave you. Wait about 100 days then go to the bank and cash it. Stopped checks only last for 90 days, then you have to renew the stop on the check. Whee your bank makes money and you're no safe than before.

      offtopic, I have seen the checks that are submitted to and from the government thanks to a drunk friend that works in the bank industry. all you have to do is drop an image of your check into the IN directory and the money will be taken OUT of your bank account. oh and the root password for that particular server is abc123. oh and they don't use 2-factor authentication. oh and employees carry their vpn keys on a usb stick. i wouldn't keep my money in bank accounts either....

    47. Re:In some cases.... by meburke · · Score: 1

      I found this: http://www.snopes.com/business/money/pennies.asp

      I had also heard that anything below a dime could be refused for payment of debts. Nothing like finding a source, right?

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    48. Re:In some cases.... by Kelson · · Score: 1

      here (Scotland) one can refuse cash payment if the amount of change given is unreasonable.

      Conversely, in the US, it's common for stores to refuse cash if the amount of change they would have to make is unreasonable. Many stores and counter-services restaurants post that they will not accept bills larger than $20 (or occasionally $50), because it's unreasonable to expect them to make change on a $4.50 purchase made with a $50 bill.

    49. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?

      A: The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."

      This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.

      http://www.ustreas.gov/education/faq/currency/lega l-tender.shtml

    50. Re:In some cases.... by weierstrass · · Score: 1

      iirc, each type of coin/note is legal tender up to a certain amount, eg 1p and 2p coins are legal tender for amounts up to £10.00, 5p coins up to £20.00 (or some other maximum values.) I hadn't heard that there's any legal restriction on paying small amounts using large notes, based on the amount of change that would have to be returned to you. YMMV in practice of course though.

      --
      my password really is 'stinkypants'
    51. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one thing i like about some "rewards" cards is the free travel ones where your company reimburses you for business expenses and you pay with your personal card. The business covers the costs and interest, and you get all the "free" (company encourages this as a benefit! [gah, thats taking it too far, but its still a pretty nice place to work for] ).

    52. Re:In some cases.... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      > So by me using a credit card for everything, I'm essentially forcing
      > mom-and-pop shops to artificially raise all of their prices %3-5 percent.

      That's a noble sentiment. But that's just the cost of doing business these days, for pretty much everyone. You do your community a whole *LOT* more good by shopping at local shops or restaurants, or even local chains, and avoiding the out-of-town corporate retailers and chains in the first place; wether you pay in cash or credit or bullion is kind of irrelevant.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    53. Re:In some cases.... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      One time I was at a conference in San Francisco and staying at the Hilton. Just before leaving I'd made a big purchase on my credit card and paid it off by electronic banking. Or at least I thought I had... turned out I made a mistake and had made a multi-thousand dollar payment to the gas company instead. I bet they were thrilled.

      So I get to SF, check in, and the card is declined (which is when I realized what had happened). For the few days while I was waiting for the correct electronic payment to go through the hotel was happy to take cash (which I had to get from an ATM because the US doesn't seem to have a universal point of sale debit system).

      I guess having the credit card information lets them track you down though, even if they couldn't charge it if you trashed the room.

    54. Re:In some cases.... by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      Ever wonder why you just have to give your bank and routing number to setup automated drafts from your bank for your credit card/cable/etc.?
      Actually, nobody gets withdrawl access on my account without providing some evidence that his name is the one on the account (there have been failed attempts to correct overdeposits because the money could only be taken back out by me).
      I have "zero clue" how your bank works.
      --
      (IANAL)
    55. Re:In some cases.... by fbjon · · Score: 1
      Routing number? Check? What are these things you speak of?

      I just don't see the point in a 'pull' system, where I give someone authorization to pull money from my account, as opposed to pushing the money directly to their account.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    56. Re:In some cases.... by stuffman64 · · Score: 1

      What about the DMV? In Pennsylvania, the DMVs do not accept cash- they take check or money order only. It's disappointing to drive 30 minutes to find out that your cash is no good...

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    57. Re:In some cases.... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0

      Heh, I figured the reason was bogus; when I read it, I assumed that was more of a rationalization the judge figured he could get away with because the guy wouldn't appeal.

    58. Re:In some cases.... by milkman_matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The fact is that at times, you are going to have to play by other people's rules. This is why I would say this guy should just buck up and get a bank account of some sort."

      Well, there's also money orders....

    59. Re:In some cases.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could go into a car dealership and put one on my credit card, but i find it very disturbing when i get things in the mail saying they have increased my credit limit to $55k. I just find it wrong when they keep raising my 'credit limit' when i keep asking them to set it at $3k. Which is more than enough for emergencies and such. I dropped that credit card, and the new one i got is.doing.the.same.thing. I don't feel safe with that high of a limit. I also dislike how credit companies can change any of the terms of the agreement and they don't even have to let you know.

    60. Re:In some cases.... by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      I'm a firm believer that if you cannot pay cash, you probably can't afford it anyways.
      This is kind of silly, no? Most people could not pay cash for their homes, but I would argue that it is false to state that they therefore cannot afford to live in their homes.

      Loans have been around for thousands of years. They are a financial tool like any other, and there is nothing inherently wrong with them. What has happened is that the lack of education and ease of obtaining loans has caused folks such as yourself to recoil at the mere thought of being in debt.

      There is good and bad debt, just like another tool (financial or otherwise) can be used for good or bad. Most people, unfortunately, do not know the difference, and that is how we got where we are today. Where you can't walk into an electronics store, a jewelry store, a furniture store, a department store, etc., without being offered a quick, easy, but extremely costly loan. It is sad that most consumers lack the education to even understand the offer, let alone evaluate it.

      But good debt is good. Most new businesses would never get off the ground without a loan. Most people could never buy property without a loan. Schools would not be built, parks would not be built, very little corporate or government investment would be possible without debt.
      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    61. Re:In some cases.... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      they will not accept bills larger than $20 (or occasionally $50), because it's unreasonable to expect them to make change on a $4.50 purchase made with a $50 bill.
      Shouldn't it be just as unreasonable for them to expect me to pay for $240 worth of food for a whole busload of people in $20 bills or smaller?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    62. Re:In some cases.... by lightversusdark · · Score: 1

      I think you can refuse over 20p in copper coins (1p & 2p) and over a fiver in shillings.

      --
      "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle
    63. Re:In some cases.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      True, but GP also makes a good point to some degree. Credit should be used for the exceptional case, not the common case. If you can't afford to pay off the credit card at the end of the month, you shouldn't be buying the stuff. That's how people get up to their ears in debt and find themselves living from paycheck to paycheck.

      Buying a (new) car or a house is the exceptional case. You don't do it often and it is something that costs a huge amount of money proportional to your salary, and saving up the money on the front end just isn't always practical (or at least requires a lot of restraint). It's a lot easier to just buy those on credit and pay them down over time. That way, you are forced to budget for it. That said, if you can't afford to pay double the minimum payment, you still shouldn't be doing it. You should always pay a lot more than the minimum payment on loans during the first part of the loan because initially, almost 100% of the minimum payment is just covering the interest. By paying double, you're actually buying down the principal, and thus significantly lowering the amount of interest you pay over the life of the loan.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    64. Re:In some cases.... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      You don't usually see surcharges because it's bad for business. I have on a few occasions in the last couple of years had to pay a surcharge of about 2%-3% on credit card transactions (most recently when paying for a vacation home rental by card instead of check because I couldn't find my checkbook). I still sometimes find gas stations out in the boonies that have a surcharge for credit card transactions. However, in most cases, there's enough profit left over after the surcharge to get by, and enough competition locally that is willing to waive the surcharge, that it's simply no longer done.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    65. Re:In some cases.... by HanClinto · · Score: 1

      wether you pay in cash or credit or bullion is kind of irrelevant

      Perhaps you're right -- I really don't know. What I do know, is that a year or two ago, I took my wife out to a little hole-in-the-wall family-owned fine Italian restaurant in town here (fantastic food in wonderful ambient-lit environment -- just the kind of place you dream about for nice dates). The owner is a very nice guy -- the first time we were there, I handed them my American Express to pay for the meal -- my reasoning was because AmEx gives me 1% back rather than 0.5% like my MC. The owner returned with my AmEx, and kindly asked if I had anything else I could pay with instead -- he said he hates taking American Express, because the fees really rape him (those were his words).

      It was about this time that I started thinking about how the 0.5%-1% I think I'm gaining is really more of a mirage -- the money has to come from somewhere.

      Maybe this chef was mistaken about how much he was being impacted -- but he felt the difference was enough to come out and ask me for a different form of payment.

    66. Re:In some cases.... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      It's also how people find themselves running to Quick Loan or Check City every two weeks. They don't just live paycheck to paycheck - they live from next week's paycheck to the one three weeks from now. There's a nice side effect of those cash joints - they lower the property value of the surrounding neighborhoods :(

    67. Re:In some cases.... by russotto · · Score: 1

      You should always pay a lot more than the minimum payment on loans during the first part of the loan because initially, almost 100% of the minimum payment is just covering the interest.
      Better to just get a loan with a shorter term in the first place; they typically have a lower interest rate.
    68. Re:In some cases.... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I think it has more to do with

      1) Not keeping cash in the register to deter convenience store thievery.
      2) Reducing the amount of counterfeit bills over $20 they have to get burned for.

    69. Re:In some cases.... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Chase Manhattan drove my $4K card up to $12K before I had them drop it back to $2500 after I got in WAY over my head. It's been left alone for a good three or four years now. They've started doing the same with my NEW Mastercard, but one phone call will cure that, and I've learned much better credit and money management skills since them.

      Chase is a great company to do business with. Excellent the one time I needed to force a chargeback to get a recalcitrant retailer to take back his defective shit, and twice when mystery charges showed up on my monthlies.

    70. Re:In some cases.... by HaeMaker · · Score: 1

      Public organizations are even less restricted by law due to Sovereign Immunity. So, even though the FAQ specifies private companies the law itself is not restricted to private companies.

    71. Re:In some cases.... by laplandsix · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of an audio sketch I heard on suckitdown.org the other day....

      http://www.suckitdown.org/?p=24

      --
      Free The Lapland Six!!!
      http://www.whatiwore.com
      What I wore, now with 100% more pool project!
    72. Re:In some cases.... by Convector · · Score: 1

      There are some gas stations 'round here (South Bay Area, CA) that charge extra if you pay with a CC. Like 6 cents a gallon.

    73. Re:In some cases.... by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Shouldn't it be just as unreasonable for them to expect me to pay for $240 worth of food for a whole busload of people in $20 bills or smaller?

      They can always waive a posted rule -- they cannot always impose it if it isn't posted.

    74. Re:In some cases.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      If you're getting money orders, buy them at the Post Office. It's the lowest rate you'll find, often less than half of what a bank would charge.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    75. Re:In some cases.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you feel comfortable that you will always be able to afford the higher rate. A longer-term loan gives you the flexibility to reduce your payments to the minimum if needed.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    76. Re:In some cases.... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      There is no federal mandate. A publicly funded school is at the state level...

      The linked document quotes the Coinage Act of 1965, (Section 31 U.S.C. 5103) as stating entitled "United States coins and currency...are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." Seems to me anything paid to a state institution is a public charge.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    77. Re:In some cases.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Incorrect.
      The law states what is legal tender, not that anyone has to take it.
      You will notice that credit cards and checks are not legal tender. they are a private contract between 3 parties. Which is why law enforcement shouldn't be involved it check fraud. Check fraud is a breech of contract. It'sa risk stores take in exchabe for money saving. A risk you and I subsidize with tax dollars.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    78. Re:In some cases.... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as he didn't have an AmEx sticker on the door I suppose that's fair. Seems like kind of a swindle to me though. Places which don't take any credit cards or all of the common credit cards should post it loud and clear, as it's quite uncommon. Especially places where you are asked to pay afterwards, like restaurants. I'm not knocking you for doing a favor to a polite restaurant owner that you may like, but asking for alternate (more costly) payment after the fact is asking you for more money, which is not a polite thing to do.

      Oh, and you should be able to get a Visa with 1% cash back these days. I have one, and I got it when I was a broke student. No idea what the interest rate is as I have never paid a dime. A Costco AmEx will get you 3% on restaurant bills. When you would otherwise split the bill at a restaurant with friends, take the cash and pay card. The wait(e)r(ess) will appreciate it, and you'll save some cash.

    79. Re:In some cases.... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's also (mostly?) the suckers who pay interest on credit card debts who fund the rewards. I mean 6% interest if you float it for 4 months will pay for 3 people's rewards.

      I will point out that, although there are costs associated with cash, they only go away if a business does not accept cash at all, which is an odd thing to do offline. A large business, 90% credit like my grocery store, may save some trips to the bank by taking in less cash, but a small business that is half cash will have about the same costs. I would guess most of the loss comes from stolen and counterfeit money. You ever notice they give franklins a good look under a blacklight some places?

    80. Re:In some cases.... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the way interest is compounded based on the time of the loan, you will pay much less in the end.

      For instance: a $100,000 will cost you ~$216,000 total over 30 years. Over 15, it will cost you $151,740. Of course, you should always consider opportunity cost, but you should also consider a 15-year mortgage if you can. I realize this is not an option if you live in coastal California. I can't even afford the 30-year mortgage, and I'm gainfully employed.

    81. Re:In some cases.... by Askmum · · Score: 1

      So technically, it is not considered legal tender to pay an amount of 21 p with a coin of 20p and one of 2p and asking 1p in return, and a shopkeeper can refuse that payment?

      I understand the thinking behind it, but putting it like this is just plain wrong. Just put down that amounts paid with more than x coins are not legal tender.

    82. Re:In some cases.... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      This is law in other EU countries as well, but with varying conditions.

      Take Germany, for example. There is a tradition in some regions for the bride to pay for her wedding shoes entirely in Pfennige (now cents). Over the decades, inflation has pushed up prices such that the bride could end up bringing hundreds of thousands of coins. It did come to one court case (I think), where the bride-to-be insisted upon the tradition, but the store owner also insisted that a sum that large was unreasonable to pay with that amount since it would take far too much time to tally the coins.

      So to my understanding, paying with cash is legal and should be accepted, but using intentionally small denominations could be considered harassment.

    83. Re:In some cases.... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess many of them are fixed costs. There would be some volume costs (fewer drops and stuff from the armored car). I'm surprised your grocery is that high on credit, when I was a clerk it was 40% check 40% credit 20% cash and that was only about 6 or 7 years ago. I haven't spent a Franklin in many a moon, but I'm not surprised. I don't honestly remember the last time I've seen a bill larger than a $20. Probably 90% of my transactions are on one of my cards (I use a couple to stretch the float period).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    84. Re:In some cases.... by rs79 · · Score: 1

      "You have zero clue how banks work. Ever wonder why you just have to give your bank and routing number to setup automated drafts from your bank for your credit card/cable/etc.? They can either submit an image of the check electronically to your bank or they can print out a paper check which doesn't have your john hancock, but a message that says "Authorized by Account Owner""

      It's not even that complicated. Give me a transit and an account # and I can ach ("electrnic funds transfer") the money out right here right now, period.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    85. Re:In some cases.... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Well, 90% of statistics are made up on the spot. I should have said 90% non-cash anyways. Checks, debits, and foodstamps all see a lot of use. I will say that the number of credit/debit (how can I tell?) users has skyrocketed in the past 6 or 7 years, pushed largely by the rise of the debit card.

      Now that illegal aliens can get credit cards I imagine it will continue to rise. Of course, they are largely paid in cash as well, so who knows.

    86. Re:In some cases.... by Harik · · Score: 1

      Saving up for a house requires exceptional restraint? Like what? Getting a good job but living in a cardboard box? Hint: If you're not living in a house, you're paying rent for an apartment, not saving up.

      Your second piece of advice isn't fiscally sound either - your home is at it's most expensive in the first few years you own it. Your 30 year mortgage is a constant dollar cost, while inflation keeps rising. Paying expensive money now vs. cheap money later isn't a good plan, especially at a 5 or 6% rate. Put the money into moderate growth funds, and then if something goes wrong (and it will) you have money to cover it. If you don't? When you miss a monthly payment, you go into forclosure even if you've been overpaying.

      Oh yeah, and in the US, mortage interest is tax-deductable, but principal payments are not.

      When talking about credit cards - if you're already in debt, yes, pay off as much as you can each month.

      Any more bad financial advice you'd like to share?

    87. Re:In some cases.... by dknj · · Score: 1

      Please explain more. Are you saying you don't have a checking account? Are you also saying no one can ever get ahold of your savings account information? Something tells me you're paying your bank for that protection you talk about. Thus you would fall under the part of my comment where I said "Now there are methods to stop this..."

    88. Re:In some cases.... by tallman68 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of having to pay all of my fines in college, I owed about $400 (about 40 tickets in 3 years) or so in parking tickets and had to play them to graduate. My college had all sorts of bizarre rules about when you could park in what lot and frankly I didn't bother to learn them all. I planned to pay in pennies. I'm very glad I didn't because the university's systems were are screwed up and they said my total was $130 including late fees. I asked if they were sure and if I could have a receipt that I was up to date on my fines. They said ok but only up to 10 days ago in case I had any recent tickets. I never found out what happened to all those other tickets. Moral of the story, I'm not sure. Suck it up and get a money order, At some point you'll need credit or do you plan on never buying a house, investing in anything and showning up at car dealerships with bags of non-seqential bills?

    89. Re:In some cases.... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I could only tell from the register print at the end of my shift. It had the total (dollars) each time broken out Cash, Credit, Check, Debit, other. At the time Debit and other were both low under 5%, and I was surprised to see the pattern that it didn't really matter what I remembered selling on a given day, but that the amounts were pretty constant ratios. Without that, i'd have been very hard pressed to tell you what my sales break outs were. I agree that the rise of debit has probably cut check use by a huge margin.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  2. Very good question. by kungfujesus · · Score: 1

    I have never been able to get an answer. Why won't people just accept cash? Isn't all money the same?

    1. Re:Very good question. by nebaz · · Score: 1

      Probably a liability issue. Cash is much more easily stolen (especially large amounts), and could be tempting. Harder to cash a check not made out to you personally.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    2. Re:Very good question. by FieroEtnl · · Score: 1

      If this were an issue involving a large amount of money, I would agree with you. Cash is extremely easy to steal in comparison to checks, money orders, or cashier's checks. Not only that, but there's always the possibility that a large amount of cash could have been acquired by illegal means, such as drug sales or money laundering.

      But the question posed by the contributor doesn't involve a large amount of money, or at least it isn't a large amount of money given the context. A hundred bucks to a large university is a proverbial drop in the bucket. It's not like he's trying to pay all of his tuition at once with a suitcase full of hundred dollar bills.

    3. Re:Very good question. by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      It's a hundred dollars per person...

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    4. Re:Very good question. by chiasmus1 · · Score: 1

      Isn't all money the same?

      Perhaps you have never exchanged money. If you go to airports to exchange money, you might notice that the exchange rate for travelers checks is better than the rate for cash.

    5. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's a hundred dollars per person...

      and he's not paying for all of them, only himself...

    6. Re:Very good question. by EightBits · · Score: 1

      The child posts are right. You usually cannot pay rent in cash either. Consider that not only is it a large amount of money if everyone pays their rent on the same day, but the date is also a known quantity. Knowing that the due date for rent is the same every month means you could very easily observe when this date is and try to hit the apartment office on that date. If they simply don't accept cash, it makes any money stolen just about worthless and worse (for the robber,) much easier to track. Basically, it makes it not worth the risk to try to rob the place. It's a good policy.

    7. Re:Very good question. by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you exchange money at the airport you are doing it wrong. Horrible, HORRIBLE rates. Find an ATM, or if you must exchange some money for local transport to the city(because you can't find/don't trust an airport ATM), just exchange enough to get to the city, then hit up an ATM. They almost always give better rates than you can get with a travelers check or cash.

    8. Re:Very good question. by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Yes, but all that cash (should everyone try to pay cash) would accumulate somewhere and that place has someone handling all that money. You might argue that not many people would go the cash route, but what is the university going to do? Set a limit on how many people can pay cash? "Oh, I'm sorry sir, the guy ahead of you just filled our cash quota. You'll have to do a money order."

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    9. Re:Very good question. by dtmos · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...but the policy would apply to all housing students. I don't know how many students are housed at UIC, but if 10,000 students paid cash in the last few days before the deadline (a not unrealistic situation at a large state university which may have 20,000 housed students), the housing authority could be holding $1 million in cash, in small bills. The security required for this, both physical (i.e., safes, cameras, limited access to certain areas) and financial (receipts, auditing, etc.) would be a major pain. (I know that if I were managing that department, establishing a no-cash policy would be my first act.) There are often valid legal (liability -- after all, this is the U.S. -- corporate structure, etc.) and accounting reasons for separating university housing (or even specific fees) from the university bursar, so the fact that he can't just have the bursar -- who may be able to accept cash -- debit his account isn't surprising, either.

      One of the main functions of college is to prepare young people for the Real World(tm) -- a place where you will often face people and entities that are not the slightest bit interested in what you want. Considering the needs of others, and not just your own desires, has a name: Maturity.

    10. Re:Very good question. by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have never been able to get an answer. Why won't people just accept cash? Isn't all money the same?

      Most of the time it boils down to liability and proof of identity. Let's say I rent a lawnmower for the day for $5. It's picked up an never returned.

      Let's say I rent an apartment, dorm room, hotel room and get no ID. After a week stay I find they had 500 cats and no litterbox and didn't use an ashtray so there are burn marks on the counter in the bathroom. They pack up and leave me the mess.

      With a credit card, I have ID and can persue a collection action and ding the credit report. I'm much more likely to have a good rental experiance.

      If you stop in the grocery store and pick up a 10 lb sack of potatos, cash is fine.

      Why won't people just accept cash? Isn't all money the same?

      I feel your pain. I was in the same boat when I was in the military. I took vacation and went to Hawaii. No amount of money would rent a car. It was a credit card or nothing. I toured the island by city bus. I missed going out to a few places and spent way too much time in the hotel bar. It's like being grounded while on vacation. Their failue to provide transportation saved me a lot of money I would have spent on entertainment.

      What I learned is a credit card is a type of finance ID. When done with the rental, most of the time you can pay cash. The card is the best way to telephone shop. Getting flowers to a wedding or funeral is easy. For a long time I had just one card and it got used about twice a year for several years.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    11. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There may be good reasons for this institutional policy; In your first paragraph you lay out the context well... then your second paragraph loses focus and self-consistancy.
      " ...a place where you will often face people and entities that are not the slightest bit interested in what you want. ...Considering the needs of others, and not just your own desires, has a name: Maturity.
      "
      Interesting juxtaposition in a single short paragraph.

      Perhaps we could modify your second sentance...

      How about:
      "...Learning to bend over and take it like a "man", has a name... the use of which is not considered appropriate for polite discussion"

      No?
      Entities which require a standard of quality in interaction with others must demand the same standard of themselves at minimum .

      The greater the difference in power between the entites, the higher the standard that must be required of the more powerful. Anything else leads to a positive feedback state that, while unsustainable, will do a lot of harm before it finally crashes.

    12. Re:Very good question. by incer · · Score: 1

      Don't know about the US, but here in Italy for these things usually you deposit money on the checking account for the organization at the postal office using a document called "bollettino" ("bulletin", according to Google), and then you have 2 receipts, one for you, and one for the receiver. Also, if you pay something in cash instead of cheque or bank transfer, most businesses (not shops) give you a discount (usually 3%). Anyway, for some things, not having a bank account is a pain... I, never having much money saved at the same time, don't have a bank account, I use a rechargeable credit card for online shopping, but for some other things you are required a bank transfer.

    13. Re:Very good question. by rikkards · · Score: 1

      On this side of the pond you can get certified checks. The bank has their own little fee but that is the cost of doing business.

    14. Re:Very good question. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      The housing department wouldn't accept payments through the bursar's office, which is specifically set up to deal with large amounts of cash. So they'd just have to set up an account with the bursar (probably a fair bit of paperwork, but not an insane amount -- one person should be able to do it in a week), and Bob's your uncle. That's how my uni set it up.

      Of course, the poster could simply go to the bank or post office and get a money order or a cashier's cheque and pay them. It's not *that* big a deal; it's only twice a year.

    15. Re:Very good question. by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      I don't know about where you're from ("cheque"), but in the States, many banks won't produce a cashier's check unless you already have an account with them. I had a similar problem at an out-of-town (nearest good-sized city) car dealership when they wouldn't accept my credit card (high credit limit, 1.9% APR on any charges incurred by MM/DD/YYYY, beats any other car loan I could get), and no banks in town would let me get a cash advance and turn that into a cashier's check, and the dealership also wouldn't accept the cash.

      So I told them if they wanted to sell me the car, they'd have to drive it out to me and then drive the rental car back to the rental place (in the same town with the dealership). Two days later, they did.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    16. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
      ---
      Ugh... why theoretical types don't work in the real world.
      59 seconds by passing the guy isn't the point. Making the next green light instead of sitting for it while it's red means you get to work 10-15 minutes faster, as lights are synced. So now you've made all green lights. The guy you passed who was going slow in the left lane getting road rage because of people coming up behind him caught the first red light and stopped. And the next 15-20 red lights. And is now late for work. And is pissed off even worse. The aneurysm came quickly after...

    17. Re:Very good question. by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Informative

      The post office will provide you with a money order for a reasonable fee, and there's no place in the country that will refuse a postal money order.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    18. Re:Very good question. by harryk · · Score: 1

      How is caving to the demands of others a sign of maturity. Seems more like a sign of weakness.

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    19. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how many students are housed at UIC, but if 10,000 students paid cash in the last few days before the deadline (a not unrealistic situation at a large state university which may have 20,000 housed students), the housing authority could be holding $1 million in cash, in small bills.

      Given that observation at my local student union show 2/3 students using credit cards for items under 5$ despite the extra dollar tagged on to all credit purchases under 20$...
      I don't think they have to worry about more than one or two students paying in cash.

    20. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is caving to the demands of others a sign of maturity. Seems more like a sign of weakness. Depends whether you're willing to accept the consequences of standing up for what you believe in. Deliberately ignoring the system then whining about it is just being a dick.
    21. Re:Very good question. by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Thats a very immature attitude haha

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    22. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in a college campus housing department, they accepted cash. In the 5 years I worked there no money ever went missing. The trick is to buy a safe and empty it out regularly. I don't think we ever had more than a few thousand in it, and that was only a few times per year and never for more than a few days at a time.

      To me it sounds like the college that won't accept this guys cash is either lazy, paranoid, or too cheap to buy a safe. What he should do start publicizing this and then request to meet with the director/VP of the department. He will have the situation resolved immediately.

    23. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that "practical considerations" bullshit, do the math! 59 seconds on a trip like that is nearly 15% of your total time spent traveling!

    24. Re:Very good question. by Mindwarp · · Score: 1

      He's not caving to the demands of others, he's complying with the requirements of others. He's the one who wants to purchase a service from them. If he doesn't like their requirements then he's perfectly capable of going and arranging housing for himself individually. I'm sure there are plenty of landlords out there that would be happy to take his cash.

      The maturity aspect comes in realizing that you can't expect the entire world to change to fit you just because you're a whiny bitch.

      --
      The gift of death metal does not smile on the good looking.
    25. Re:Very good question. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "...and Bob's your uncle."

      Ok...what the heck does this mean?!?!

      Also, I'm guessing in your post...'uni' = University = College?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    26. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dealer only accepts cash. So, how could I buy my weed with a postal money order?

      She also doesn't like George Washington dollars (the coins) or $2 bills.

    27. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasonable fee = $0.90 for transactions less than $500.

      I had to use a money order to pay taxes (I'm a student, so I had $1 in taxes after withholding). Net result: The government overcharged me by 90%.

    28. Re:Very good question. by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      We'd finished a stressful negotiation for a large amount of money, and no one, not even the dealership, came up with such an idea. The only thing they came up with was a certified check, and we all kind of fixated on that.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    29. Re:Very good question. by lessthan · · Score: 1

      Out of the choices, I would go with paranoid. You might have been a trustworthy person, but I'm sure that most universities have come across some bad apples. 'Once bitten, twice shy' does not even begin to cover the reaction a bureaucracy can have.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    30. Re:Very good question. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, my dealer only accepted cunnilingus as payment. (Remember to check "post anonymously"!)

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    31. Re:Very good question. by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      English vernacular.

      "...and Bob's your uncle." = "there you have it."

      "uni"= abbreviation for university.

    32. Re:Very good question. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Dollar rental car lets you pay cash, even in Hawaii.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Very good question. by Technician · · Score: 1

      Dollar rental car lets you pay cash, even in Hawaii.

      When did they change. Hertz, Avis, and Dollar wouldn't consider permitting a rental without a credit card impression. Maybe you can pay cash at checkout, but last time I was there you couldn't get it in the first place without a credit card. That has been over a decade ago, so things may have changed. I haven't tried to rent without a credit card since I left the service.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    34. Re:Very good question. by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1

      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!

      Yes, but extrapolate that to a 400 mile trip.

      The trip takes 6 hours, 9 minutes, and 13.8 seconds at 65 miles per hour.

      At 75 miles per hour it takes 5 hours 20 minutes. You have now saved 49 minutes, 13.8 seconds.

      It's worth the extra speed, especially when that 49 minutes means beating the NYC rush hour, or sitting through 3 additional hours of traffic.

      You are lucky that the dealership actually drove the car out for you. I don't think most business' would do something like that.

      -Ed
      --
      So you see what had happened was....
    35. Re:Very good question. by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      It was drive it out to us, or lose the sale entirely. We were going to walk out and go to a different dealership in the same town where I'd found our second choice.

      Regarding my sig, I read somewhere that the median highway drive was about eight (definitely less than ten) miles; as a recovering math teacher, I picked the numbers to make the answer come out. The actual situation that inspired my personal epiphany was a two-lane highway in rural Michigan, where the towns (read: speed traps, but the roads widened to four lanes, allowing easy passing) averaged about nine miles apart. Inevitably, I'd get behind somebody doing the speed limit or just below (say 53 MPH) when I was trying to go about 64 (just slow enough to not get pulled by a cop between towns. Suppose I got stuck with seven miles to go to the next town. At 53 MPH, that's about 475 seconds, while at 64, it's 394. If I could pass right away, I'd save only about 80 seconds. But if there was any traffic coming the other way, I'd have to jockey up and back, waiting for a space big enough, hoping it really was big enough, using extra gas every time I thought there was enough space and had to change my mind, and every mile this took shaved over 11 seconds from my savings.

      Once I'd worked this out ("done the math"), and then taking into account how many seconds the extra stress was taking off my life, plus the possibility that I'd eventually misjudge the space, I found it much more relaxing to follow right along. When I occasionally got behind someone really slow (a combine, for example) with oncoming traffic, I'd redo the math in my head (keeping in mind that a combine is unlikely to go much farther than the end of the fellow's farm) and make an informed decision about whether to even try to pass.

      Similar logic applies on the interstate. On a four-hundred mile trip, on an interstate with no oncoming traffic (just watch out for jackasses roaring up from behind at 90 MPH!), when you can control the speed differential between lanes, you "do the math" and make an informed decision. You've seen the guy whip out from behind you into the left lane, then back in front of you, slam on his brakes and get off at the exit. He made you brake, and maybe the guy behind you, possibly causing a chain reaction that puts one of those traffic-jam pulses into a crowded highway costing hundreds of people as much as a few minutes (or more), and for what? Two seconds, maybe four? Don't be that guy. Do the math.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    36. Re:Very good question. by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1

      I happen to drive in such a way that I don't let that guy cut me off. I like to be very aware of what's coming up behind me, so I adjust myself accordingly. I tend to ride in the left lane as I do more passing than following due to the way my car handles. Once I'm up to speed, because it's a heavy car, it doesn't need much gas to maintain speed, so I ride the pedal lightly, and since it is heavier, it get's up hill's better than the smaller cars on the road, so I end up riding up to people without actually trying to.

      Many times, when I do see that guy riding up on me. I just set the cruise control at whatever speed is fast enough to be moving well, but not fast enough to get a ticket, and just drive. I don't get stressed over that guy, I just don't let him have his way with me.

      -Ed

      --
      So you see what had happened was....
    37. Re:Very good question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should have taken $0.90 worth of the free shipping supplies the post office usually gives away. As a student, a dozen foot square cardboard boxes would probably come in handy.

  3. Wow... by ResQuad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Goto your postoffice, and get a cashiers check. Seriously. Not rocket science here.

    1. Re:Wow... by Endymion · · Score: 1

      one problem with this technique is most places charge some fee to make the money order/etc.

      It may not be a lot, but the $7 they hit me with once was a lot in the "no cash college days".

      --
      Ce n'est pas une signature automatique.
    2. Re:Wow... by ximenes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The post office charges the following amounts for postal money orders:

      $0.01 to $500.00 - $1.05
      $500.01 to $1,000.00 - 1.50

      which I'm sure can fit into anyone's budget. Although I guess if a person doesn't trust banks then why entrust your money to the government or quasi-government agencies.

    3. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if he has no bank account, I'm more than certain that he isn't cashing his check (job wages or whatever income) for free either anyway.

    4. Re:Wow... by sgant · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For some reason, this guy doesn't trust banks and does everything in cash. What makes you think he's gonna trust the post office and all their new-fangled machines that do their witchery?

      I'm just saying...

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    5. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although I guess if a person doesn't trust banks then why entrust your money to the government or quasi-government agencies. Probably not the brightest idea to go to a state-owned university in that case either.
    6. Re:Wow... by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

      Umm, you do know that if you take the cheque you are given as payment to the issuing bank, they will generally cash it for you free of charge.*

      i.e. if XYZ company issues me a paycheque drawn on an account at ABC bank I can take it to an ABC bank branch and cash it for free.

      This of course may not work with national companies which bank at local/regional banks outside of your area, unless you enjoy road-trips.

      *I don't know if it is legally required or not (although at this moment I'm leaning heavily towards not). But aside from one possible exception (I can't remember, honestly), I've never had an issue with being charged for cashing a cheque if it was drawn on account held by that bank.

    7. Re:Wow... by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

      Umm, you do know that if you take the cheque you are given as payment to the issuing bank, they will generally cash it for you free of charge.*

      Incorrect. Banks nowadays will charge a non-accountholder a $4 or $5 fee to cash a check drawn on that bank. I discovered this fee structure after being out of work for some time, and basically scrounging around doing small jobs for enough to keep me in eating money, so not really having a checking account. So I get a check for $25 for doing some work as a notary public. I hadn't had a bank account for quite a while as I had run out of money and (then) banks required a minimum $100 to open an account and to average $100 each day to have an account or they charged you anywhere from $4 to $7 a month. Well, as it turned out, the bank this check was drawn on would allow me to open a checking account for free with no minimum balance, so it was acceptable to do that instead.

      Paul Robinson — My Blog
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    8. Re:Wow... by X-treme-LLama · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Banks nowadays will charge a non-accountholder.... Umm, not incorrect. I've cashed quite a number of cheques at multiple banks in the area I live in, and have only had one bank (possibly, I still don't remember) that wished to charge me a fee. Even if this isn't true at the bank you went to, or even perhaps in general, it does not make my statement incorrect as it was based on my own personal experience.

      Just to avoid further pedants:

      The above is my own personal experience, YMMV.
    9. Re:Wow... by ajs318 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, knock the transaction fee off whatever you pay them. This is what I used to do when paying bills at a post office that charge a transaction fee. If the bill was for £26, and they ended up getting only £24.50 due to the £1.50 transaction fee, that's their problem (and they aren't going to chase anybody up for a lousy quid fifty; it'll cost them more than that in ink just printing the address on the envelope). See how they like being charged a fee! If enough people do it, the system will change.

      By the way, when paying bills by means of a cheque in the post, never, ever put a stamp on the envelope. Just write "RECIPIENT TO PAY POSTAGE" on it. BT used to write "Royal Mail will not deliver unstamped items" in the "stamp" space on their envelopes. I used to write "Oh yes they will!"

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    10. Re:Wow... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Although I guess if a person doesn't trust banks then why entrust your money to the government or quasi-government agencies.
      You don't have to trust them, only the recipient of the money order does. As long as they accept that form of payment, it has just as much purchasing power to you as the cash did.

      I agree with the frustration over not having cash accepted as a form of payment, but I think the other posters here are right, probably the reason they don't accept cash is for liability reasons; cash disappears too easily and is equally valuable if it is intercepted, while checks, credit cards, and money orders have little or no value to any interceptors.

      My guess is they have RA's and the like accepting the payments (untrusted agents) so it's not you they're concerned with, it's the recipients of the money.

      Check with your bursar's office, where I went to school they offered money orders for something like $0.50, and also issued certificates of deposit which could be used to cover atypical school expenses (such as fees associated with a school trip which were payable to the professor running the trip). Finally for all official and typical school functions, they enabled parents to put a certain amount of money against the student's photo ID, and this photo ID could be used at things like the dining hall (if you were not on a meal plan), on-campus convenience stores, the school store (including school supplies, and books and other merchandise), and also for those sorts of unusual fees (we also had to pay a deposit if we were expecting to room there the following semester, and they accepted student ID's for this purpose).

      Basically they wanted to give parents a way to grant their child access to money, without that child being able to use it for non-school-related activities, but students could use the same system as quasi cash.
    11. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got another question for Slashdot. I don't want to use any computerized device of any sort, but how do I check my email? Are computerized devices the only way to check email these days? I don't want to spend the money to hire someone to check my email for me, either- that would just be stupid.

    12. Re:Wow... by chill · · Score: 1

      I suspect his objection is privacy-related. Many grocery stores will issue money orders without asking for any form of ID. Just give them the cash, plus $0.50 or so, and you'll get a money order.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    13. Re:Wow... by IPFreely · · Score: 1

      What makes you think he's gonna trust the post office and all their new-fangled machines that do their witchery?

      Because it is not he who must trust it. It is whoever is demanding something other than cash. Once he has paid the PO for the money order, he's off the hook. It is up to the school to retrieve that money from the PO. If he gets it made out for cash, he does not even have to put his name on it.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    14. Re:Wow... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      When was this? Banks only started doing it recently. All banks around here. It started with business accounts, and now it applies to all checks.

      I've complained to my bank about their policy repeatedly. It is my damn money, and when I write a check to someone, I expect my bank to give them that amount of money, regardless of how my bank gets the check. It actually costs them more to handle their own checks coming in from other banks than to deal with them at the counter.

      OTOH, if everyone starts cashing checks manually, they'd have a problem: They couldn't charge outrageous fees on people who deposited bad checks. They can't fine people who show up in person to deposit a bad check, all they can do is not give them the money and give them the check back.

      Banks are completely out of control with fees at this point. The ironic things is, banks know this and advertise a lack of fees, but they mean 'monthly fees', which no one gives a shit about. We're not idiots, we can add up the monthly fees mentally into one sum and know that's the cost of the account. They still charge crazy amounts for overdrafts of penny and charge customers for bad checks they deposit and now charge check cashers for getting money an account holder has written a check for.

      All sorts of crap they can only get away with by forcing people to use banks more and more. They've already started giving discounts for direct deposit, which in reality means they're charging people for not using it. Soon they'll start charging people for not using automatic bill pay.

      I'm not one of those crazy people who rant about 'conspiracies' and stuff, but banks are making it harder and harder for you to operate in any manner besides having an account with them, and, since they know you have to have said account, are then feeling free to completely rip people off. What are you going to do, go to another bank that does exactly the same thing?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    15. Re:Wow... by wiggles · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny story, but in the US, if you try to pay a bill 'postage due' as we call it on this side of the pond, the creditor can refuse to pay the postage, and the letter gets returned to you, which means your bill is now late, and your credit rating gets damaged. Protecting your credit is worth a $.41 stamp.

    16. Re:Wow... by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (and they aren't going to chase anybody up for a lousy quid fifty; it'll cost them more than that in ink just printing the address on the envelope)

      You forget that this is a public university. Not only are they petty enough to demand the buck fifty, but they'll put holds on his registration to do it! They don't have to go after him; he'll come crawling back when he can't register for classes.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:Wow... by alanshot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...and they aren't going to chase anybody up for a lousy quid fifty..."

      Dont count on it. Here in the 'States, there have been many instances of government agencies and the like actually chasing people down for sub-$1 amounts owed.

      I remember reading a story about a woman that was actually arrested for an outstanding underpayment of 32 cents. Apparently they spent 6 months to a year mailing her notices about it. As I remeber she went to a court hearing for something else (as a defendant or witness)when they by chance discovered she had an outstanding warrant and arrested her on the spot.

      Never underestimate the stupidity of government.

      Besides, if he tried to pull the "you are responsible for the charges, here is my money order for $98.50" they would most likely hand it right back and say sorry, thats not the correct amount. bring us one in the proper amount.

      Personally, I say adapt and accept the requirements of living in the real world here in the 21st century and get a freaking checking account. If you want to be paranoid and noconformist, go live in a shack in the mountains or move to a 3rd world country where they barter and dont use banks. (or at least dont try to do things like going to college that might require things like a bank account, credit accounts, etc)

    18. Re:Wow... by WillyMF1 · · Score: 1
      You are so right, and I just want to take a moment to single out several of the shitty banks in my area that charge a fee for cashing checks drawn on their accounts, as of 2 years ago. Before opening an account I went around and specifically asked about this practice and received the "we are shitballs" response from:

      BANK OF AMERICA(reportedly started the practice, claiming it cost the bank too much to cash mexican lettuce farmers cheques who "wouldn't" open accounts with them.... this bank also apparently take their disrespect of their customers associates to the next level by making them stand in separate lines)
      Wachovia
      BB&T

      I ended up with the fourth bank I talked to which is Chevy Chase (D.C. area) and have been very happy with them.

    19. Re:Wow... by SLi · · Score: 0, Troll

      Funny that you should talk about 3rd world countries when your banking system (WTF, you actually still use checks?) is the most ancient in the first world.

    20. Re:Wow... by darkshadow · · Score: 1

      Freedom costs $1.05

      --
      -Darkshadow (There was a thing called Heaven; but all the same they used to drink enormous quantities of alcohol.)
    21. Re:Wow... by funkify · · Score: 1

      He'll start having really "special" feelings for his cash when he gets his ass beaten and mugged and all his precious cash stolen.

      Get a bank account, or at least use a credit union. The only people these days who don't use the system are ones with no money, criminals (i.e. bad check writers, etc.), or the preponderously ignorant, as the original poster seems to be.

      Some banks do suck less than others. Figure out which bank is most convenient for you and sucks the least, and get an account.

    22. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly, you haven't had to deal with our lovely automated systems we have in the US. I kid you not, I once got a bill for $0.28 from my university when I underpaid. They simply didn't care that it was costing them more to send the bill and make threats about dropping all my classes than it would for me to pay them the extra few cents. (Yes, my university at least accepted cash - I even asked for change)

      Quite simply, with the systems they have in place now and the situation the OP is in, he's better off paying it in full than risking the wrath of a soulless bureaucracy capable of kicking him to the street if he doesn't pay the whole thing.

    23. Re:Wow... by Grave · · Score: 1

      Bank of America "fixed" that problem by allowing people to get credit cards without a SSN. Thus, the traditional requirement of, you know, being a legal resident of this country, has been waived. So I suspect those mexican lettuce farmers are able to now get bank accounts with them.

      What I've found is that the larger the bank, the more ridiculous their policies and the higher their fees. Local and regional banks are often much more friendly about things, and have much more reasonable fee policies. In fact, my current bank actually refunds me any ATM fees I incur. So despite my relatively meager checking account there, I've made more money off them than they ever did off fees to me.

      In regards to the original topic, just get a money order. Or, accept the fact that living off the grid is going to cause you much, much bigger headaches than this in the future. I just can't fathom why you wouldn't trust a bank at this point. If you're that paranoid, get an account and only keep a small sum of money in it, while holding the rest as cash (which is going to get you in much more trouble later on -- you get robbed, tough luck; bank gets robbed, you're covered up to $100,000). If you're worried about identity theft, you'll probably be surprised at how many other places will have your needed info on file somewhere. If you truly wanted to live off the grid, you wouldn't be going to a university, and you wouldn't be posting this sort of information on Slashdot.

    24. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I guess if a person doesn't trust banks then why entrust your money to the government or quasi-government agencies.
      You don't have to trust them, only the recipient of the money order does. I disagree. Once you have purchased the money order, the government could collapse before you were able to redeem the money for services, and then you would be out of luck.

      Of course the same is true for money as well.
    25. Re:Wow... by Damvan · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I graduated college, they initially refused to give me my diploma because I had a CREDIT on their system of about $10. I had to wait 3 weeks for them to cut me a check for that $10, only then could I collect my actual paper diploma. I guarentee you that they would withhold that diploma/registration etc for a balance due of $1.50.

    26. Re:Wow... by sys_mast · · Score: 1

      Um....If he doesn't trust a "government or quasi-government agencies" to back the money order they give him....why would he trust that same governments cash??? If your theory holds true, he should only deal in materials that are themselves worth the value of the transaction, such as gold/diamonds/silver.

      --
      Those who can, do.
    27. Re:Wow... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      I think that if there is such a catastrophic and sudden failure of government that the moneyorder became valueless between when you bought it and when you were able to hand it in an hour later, 1) the loss of $100 would be the least of your concerns, and 2) your cash isn't much good any more either.

    28. Re:Wow... by arminw · · Score: 1

      .....Or, accept the fact that living off the grid is going to cause you much, much bigger headaches than this in the future....

      That much bigger headache was predicted long ago. It is the emergence of a world, wherein it will no longer be possible to buy or sell without each person having some sort of numerical identifier affixed to the body. There is already talk about a cashless society. We may be much closer to that then most of us realize. That little piece of plastic in your pocket is a precursor to things to come. Individual anonymity, financial or otherwise, will be as extinct as the dinosaurs. The prediction is in connection with a single one world government which will institute that system.

      --
      All theory is gray
    29. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My university has fixed that kind of problem, any outstanding credit becomes a donation in your name upon graduation here.

    30. Re:Wow... by mi · · Score: 1

      Funny that you should talk about 3rd world countries when your banking system (WTF, you actually still use checks?) is the most ancient in the first world.

      Yes, and our Democracy is also "the most ancient" in the world (not just "first world"). So what?

      Using hand-written checks is still possible, yes. Why is that wrong?

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    31. Re:Wow... by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      "Thus, the traditional requirement of, you know, being a legal resident of this country, has been waived"

      I call BS on this. When I was a child, SSN were not issued until you were older....and my grandfather opened an account for me. No SSN required.

      BoA has branches around the world. Many people can be in the US legally and need to open an account but not need a SSN (tourist ot Vegas wins big...wants to open account to be able to deposit the big check...).

      Businesses do not have SSNs.

      And so on. And remember...pre-Social security administration, no-one had SSNs at all. Very few people had photo identification either. Banks still existed. So it appears your "traditional" is nothing of the sort.

    32. Re:Wow... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and our Democracy is also "the most ancient" in the world (not just "first world"). So what? Well, at the risk of straying off topic, our democracy was designed by people who hoped there would never be such a thing as a political party, and instead that voters would judge candidates as individuals and candidates would run as individuals. The system has had to adapt to the reality that parties exist, but it's been done awkwardly and unsatisfactorily - just witness all the comments from people who complain about the two-party system, wish they didn't have to choose between the lesser of two evils, etc. who aren't aware that that problem is caused by the way we elect representatives (Duverger's law). Other democracies that came later are arguably better suited to the reality of political parties.
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    33. Re:Wow... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Who do you think will be on the hook if the post office refuses to honor the money order?

      The person who is obliged to pay the $100 in the first place, of course. Just as if a check bounces or your CC is later declined, that doesn't mean you are off the hook for the money you owe.

      So if the Post Office defaults, he'll have lost the $100 that he gave to the PO to pay for the money order, and now he'll have the same problem again of having to pay $100 cash, so his cost would be $200 instead of $100.

      But presumably by the time they get around to notifying him the postal order failed to be honored, it will no longer be a prepayment, it will now be a debt.

      Once the $100 becomes a debt (and no longer a prepayment), they will have no choice but to either accept the legal tender, OR when they refuse it in the presence of witnesses, or in such a way as he can resolutely prove they were informed of the consequences and refused the legal tender to cover the debt anyways, they have in effect forgiven the debt by refusal to accept payment.

    34. Re:Wow... by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Eh, may as well get a leg up. They'll be asking you for far more money in the future, and you'll have to pay it to get the crappy magazine, which you'll want for some reason... Is that just me?

    35. Re:Wow... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      "the government could collapse before"

      Methinks at this point, your money order would probably be close to the last thing on your mind. Doing the dishes or laundry would probably land last.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    36. Re:Wow... by SLi · · Score: 1

      Because writing a check and mailing it to the recipient just is not the way that money transfers are done in the 21st century, and it's obviously very clumsy. In the rest of the modern world it stopped to be the way in maybe the 80s.

    37. Re:Wow... by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      That's the point of a money order or cashier check: They take the responsability once the check is written.

      Personal checks and bank checks are different. With personal checks, the person writing it takes responsability for it. With cashier bank checks and money orders, the bank takes responsability for it.

      The difference is that with a personal check, you do not actually pay out money until the check is cashed. You could block it before then if you wanted to, or might not have the funds to pay it or whatever, but you are responsable for backing it up at the time it is cashed. If you fail, then you could be in trouble.

      Bank checks and money orders, you pay up front. The responsability for paying the money goes with the money. The money that is in the money order is now in the hands of the PO and they are now legally responsable for delivering it. If they fail, they are on the hook. That's the whole point of a money order. They guarentee payment in situations were personal checks may be less reliable. This is precisely why some people demand money orders instead of personal checks.

      Of course, if the PO were to refuse payment, the receiver might mess with you in some way. They should go after whoever issued the money order. But an unscrupulous or lazy type might go after you instead. Any institution that demands a money order should know how to deal with it if it goes bad though, especially something as large as a University. And any institution that issues money orders and fails to pay them is likely to get in regulatory trouble itself.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    38. Re:Wow... by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      What if you don't put a return address on the envelope?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  4. Well good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Petty point-scoring over the university aside, sooner or later you're going to have to
    • get a grown-up job that doesn't pay in cash
    • get a loan
    • get a mortgage
    You will need bank accounts down the line (and a credit score!) so why not get one now? Even if you leave it empty and top if up for special occasions like this.
    1. Re:Well good luck with that by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      get a grown-up job that doesn't pay in cash
      Or go to the company's bank, and they'll cash it for free. No account needed.

      get a loan...get a mortgage
      Okay, this is a little harder as you need the credit score, and by using cash only one does not get a credit score. However, if one is wise about their spending, than this can be circumvented by either paying in full in cash (e.g. thereby avoiding the loan), or by co-signing with someone who does have a credit score and making all the payments in cash - thereby getting your own credit score, though not necessarily a very good one. (Also, be careful on that second one as some may not count it for your credit score, only the person co-signing with you.)

      So, yes - it is indeed possible to do everything in life with cash and cash alone. May be a little harder, but doable. It all depends on what you want to do to. If you are willing to pay rent for the rest of your life, then you can avoid the mortgage issue; if you can save enough at a time to pay in full, then you can avoid loans - and be better off for it. Though, car dealers and others will still sell you a car if you have no credit history, you just won't get as good a rate or they may require a co-signer or larger initial deposit; after a few such transactions, then you'll have a credit score and it won't be a problem. ;-)
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    2. Re:Well good luck with that by macmastery · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily need a credit score to get a mortgage. You can go with a lender that does manual underwriting. Instead of the low-effort, pull-your-credit-score route, they look at your actual employment history, savings and investments. If you avoid debt besides mortgages, you can still get a mortgage unless your lender is really lazy.

    3. Re:Well good luck with that by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Petty point-scoring over the university aside, sooner or later you're going to have to

              * get a grown-up job that doesn't pay in cash
              * get a loan
              * get a mortgage

      Even with a good credit score and a highly paying job, some people simply can't get mortgages. For example, musicians.

      Banks will refuse to give a mortgage, even if you've made $100,000 in each of the last ten years, because there's no guarantee that you will be able to make that amount again in the future.

      Our cash-loving friend might just have to stick to renting.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    4. Re:Well good luck with that by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Or go to the company's bank, and they'll cash it for free. No account needed.

      Wrong. Banks have started charging fees on cashing their own checks at their counter.

      It's fucking absurd, I know, but true.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Well good luck with that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is you'll pay far more than someone who never paid any interest, but used a credit card.

    6. Re:Well good luck with that by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Or go to the company's bank, and they'll cash it for free. No account needed.
      Wrong. Banks have started charging fees on cashing their own checks at their counter.
      wrong I've done it. If you just go to any bank, then yes - they will charge a fee. If, however, you go to the bank that the company holds an account with, who issued the check, then at least typically they will not charge a fee. And yes - I have done this. I went to open an account, had a paycheck but needed some of the money back (for expenses); the bank I was opening an account was going to put a hold on the check due it coming from another bank, and advised that I go cash the check at the issuing bank and return; I did - and got it in full without an account there.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    7. Re:Well good luck with that by Chaostrophy · · Score: 1

      Move to Las Vegas, the casinos cash checks for free and give you stuff to boot. :-)
      Banks charging to cash their customers checks is just insane, charge the customer, not the person they've paid.

      --
      Plato seems wrong to me today
    8. Re:Well good luck with that by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You can say 'wrong' all you want, but my bank does this. If I write someone a check, and they go to my bank to cash it, my bank charges five dollars.

      All you people saying 'No they don't'...have you actually done this in the last year or two, or did you miss the point where I said they started doing this?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    9. Re:Well good luck with that by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      More to the point, charge the customer for checking, which is what actually makes sense in the first place.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:Well good luck with that by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      You can say 'wrong' all you want, but my bank does this. If I write someone a check, and they go to my bank to cash it, my bank charges five dollars.
      All you people saying 'No they don't'...have you actually done this in the last year or two, or did you miss the point where I said they started doing this?
      Your bank may. To my knowledge, neither of my 2 Federal Savings banks, nor my Michigan based credit union do. Nor did Sun Trust - the bank that I went to and did that at back in 2004; may be they have started since then, but I would still gather that that is not standard practice.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    11. Re:Well good luck with that by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

      Even with a good credit score and a highly paying job, some people simply can't get mortgages. For example, musicians.

      Banks will refuse to give a mortgage, even if you've made $100,000 in each of the last ten years, because there's no guarantee that you will be able to make that amount again in the future. Well, the answer to that is spend between $25 to $200 depending on the state, incorporate (or form an LLC depending on what type of operation you need), and then appoint yourself to a corporate office. You may have to spend a few dollars to order a commercial phone line and perhaps pay for a business address to receive mail. Now, you have a legitimate "employer" and an actual office, rather than listing yourself as being self-employed. Generally problems like that occur because of people who (in this case) have more money than sense. If you're making $100,000 a year and are self-employed, you should either be incorporated or operating through an LLC because of tax and other benefits, liability protection, plus corporate credit availability. A relative of mine operates a business which makes less than $40,000 a year does so in corporate form for those reasons. A lot of things that are non-deductable overhead for you as an individual - and paid out of post-tax dollars - become deductible expenses for a corporate entity and are paid from pre-tax dollars, also reducing your tax liability. You just have to do the paperwork right, don't commit fraud and it is almost impossible to have the corporate existence challenged.
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    12. Re:Well good luck with that by Harik · · Score: 1

      It takes 5 to 7 years before a company gets credit. It's _TOUGH_. Even with a Dunn & Bradstreet listing, and 4 years of audited recordkeeping, we still couldn't get terms on network gear. Ended up having to run the business on a personal Amex until year 5, when magically "Oh, here, have lines of credit! Good rates!".

      That's a small business, with ~150k/year gross. Much like what you're reccommending to this guy. Still, there ARE benefits to incorperating when you don't have a direct 'employer' to deal with. It's worth doing. And besides, if he's pulled in a cool mil in a decade, he can afford someone to handle the paperwork. Unless it's all gone straight up his nose...

  5. buy a money order. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just go get a money order from the post office or even a convenience store.

    Doing everything in cash, imo, is sort of retarded. I don't particularly trust banks either, but when inconvenience impacts me regularly, I make concessions.

    1. Re:buy a money order. by KevMar · · Score: 1

      Money order is the way to go.

      They prabably find that cash dissapears too quickly or some administrative BS like that.

      Just ask them why whould they not take cash?. If they dont know, walk up the chain of command. someone should be able to come up with a valid reason other than its policy.

      --
      Im a gamer, not a grammer major. This post is full of spelling and grammer mistakes.
    2. Re:buy a money order. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      Money orders are indeed more smart. They provide a receipt. Ever have someone tell you that you didn't pay them, then you had to go and get the receipt to prove it to them? It does happen.

    3. Re:buy a money order. by Verte · · Score: 1

      It's the only way really when you've got tax or child support problems.

      --
      We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    4. Re:buy a money order. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...when inconvenience impacts me regularly...


      Ouch, that must hurt! What velocity is the inconvenience traveling at when it strikes you? Is is hard to pull it out of your flesh? Does it dig into the bone? What other effects does such a collision have on your body? Do the injuries sustained affect your mobility?
    5. Re:buy a money order. by Meatloaf+Surprise · · Score: 1

      Can you give me some reasons you don't trust banks? Do you fear losing money or is it more of a distrust in what the banks are investing your money in?

    6. Re:buy a money order. by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      In my experience, you write all the payment information except the value by hand, and fill out the receipt the same way. I might have filled out the receipt with your name, but the money order itself went to my cousin Bob.

      Hopefully that's changed by now (three years or so).

    7. Re:buy a money order. by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      Well, see...

      If you provide the receipt, the payee can then contact western union (say) or the post office (say) or whoever issued the money order.

      "Where and when was this money order deposited from, and who endorsed it?"

      Easily proving fraud, eh.

    8. Re:buy a money order. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Writing on the stub of a money order is just for your own records. The point is, indeed, to keep the number so if someone disputes they got it, you can look it up.

      Also, money orders expire, and when they do so without being deposited, you can get your cash back if you have the stub.

      Money orders are essentially 'certified checks' that are in the name of someone else. When you buy them, you put the money in said account. As long as you have the stub, you can do things with that account. (But not cancel the money order or take your cash back before they expire.)

      I don't think certified checks are issued anymore, but that used to be what they were. You'd take money from your bank account and put it in a seperate untouchable account and get a single check written on that account for that amount. Money orders are someone else doing that for you.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    9. Re:buy a money order. by japhmi · · Score: 1

      I don't think certified checks are issued anymore, but that used to be what they were.


      I just got a certified check last year for my mortgage down payment. Basically, the only difference between a certified (or cashiers) check and a money order is whom you get it from. Certified checks come from a bank or credit union, money orders come from a 3rd party.
      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    10. Re:buy a money order. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ah, you're confusing cashier's checks and certified checks. All cashier's checks are certified, but all certified checks are not cashier's. Certified checks and money orders are 'normal checks', just on accounts that are untouchable by the owners. Banks have basically stopped writing certified checks, because there isn't a lot of point...if something needs assurances of funds, that now is normally done by a electronic transfer.

      A cashier's check, OTOH, is written on the bank itself, not on an account in the bank. (Well, technically, they're written on an account owned by the bank, but whatever. The bank must honor it no matter what.) Certified checks and money orders have an account 'in your name' (Or, in the case of money orders, a bearer account for the possession of the receipt.) with the money behind them, although it's an account you can't actually touch. Cashier's checks do not. They aren't backed by, even if it's just in some theoretical sense, 'your' money in 'your' account.

      They are most often issued in situations like you said, where a financial institution wants to give money to someone 'in your name', but not in any way that you can legally claim ownership of the money while in transfer. This is almost always because the financial institution is give you some sort of loan to pay off someone.

      Or, for a nicer POV, they do it to let you avoid the tax liability that being given that much money, even if you then immediately handing it to someone else, could incur. It was never legally yours, and thus you do not have to pay taxes on it.

      Let's say that you need to pay James 250 dollars to buy his TV, but can't, so I've offered to pay it for you and you can pay me back. A cashier's check is like I write a check for James, and give it to you to pass along, getting your TV in exchange...you don't pay taxes on that. (You wouldn't anyway, but whatever.) The money went from me to James, and later money is going to go from you to me. Two money transfers. You physically possessed the actual check, but not the money behind it.

      OTOH, a certified check is is if I put the money in an (somehow legally untouchable by you) account in your name, write out a check on that account and have you sign it, and have you give that to James. You would legally own that money for a short period of time. When you factor in your repayment to me, that's three money transfer, me to you, you to James, and you to me, so more possible taxes, and a place for you to screw with the transfer while the money is legally yours.

      (Notice when I was talking about taxes, I was talking about income and whatnot, not sales.)

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    11. Re:buy a money order. by russotto · · Score: 1

      There's no tax consequences to the user of either a cashier's or certified check, above and beyond that of the original transaction.

      With a cashier's check, you pay the bank $X (plus a fee) for the check, and the bank pays $X to the payee (usually through the check-clearing system) when the check comes in.

      With a certified check, you pay the bank a fee and they issue a check for $X drawn on your account. They then put a hold on $X in your account so you can't withdraw it any other way. The bank pays the $X when the certified check comes in.

      The only tax consequence in either case is the fee paid to the bank, which is income to the bank.

      Banks generally prefer to issue cashiers checks rather than certified checks, perhaps because then they make money on the "float".

    12. Re:buy a money order. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      There's no tax consequences on the check. I was talking about the original transactions. All transactions that end in exactly the same money and property in everyone's hands are not legally identical.

      For a home loan, for example, the bank could a) loan you the money, and you pay it to the owners, or b) pay the owners directly. a) consists of you temporarily possessing $150,000, which you do, indeed, have to pay income taxes on, even if it was only yours for a few seconds. (Yes, you'd possibly also get a large deduction, but it would not equal out.)

      When it's your own money, it hardly matters if you pay it to the bank, or stick it in a bank account (where it is still legally yours) and write a check on that account. When it's not starting as your own money, like a loan, it certainly does matter, both for taxes and other reasons.

      Of course, it matters so much that banks won't actually do it the other way.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:buy a money order. by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

      For a home loan, for example, the bank could a) loan you the money, and you pay it to the owners, or b) pay the owners directly. a) consists of you temporarily possessing $150,000, which you do, indeed, have to pay income taxes on, even if it was only yours for a few seconds. (Yes, you'd possibly also get a large deduction, but it would not equal out.)

      Uh, not correct. If someone gives you money for no reason without obligation, it's a "gift" and if it's above a certain factor, they owe a gift tax but you do not owe tax on the gift, because it is not considered income. If someone gives you money in exchange for something done for them (either before or after you are paid), it's considered "income" and is subject to taxation depending on how much you made and what you're doing. If someone loans you money that you are required to pay back, it is a loan, you do not have ownership of that money, and thus, it is not income and is not taxable. It's only if you either don't pay it back or are forgiven part of it that it may be considered income. As long as you have to give it back, it's not taxable.

      Paul Robinson — My Blog
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
    14. Re:buy a money order. by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      What effect does "bartering one thing for another thing" do to income?

  6. Payment of Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legal Tender means that it must be accepted as payment of a debt.

    However, if there's no debt, there's no requirement to accept cash.
    I'm pretty sure a store could refuse to sell you something if you used cash, and in the case of this a "pre-payment" is certainly not a debt.

    I think you're letting your paranoia get the best of you though, seriously. Are you just trying to prove a point? Or do you like cutting your nose off to spite your face?

    1. Re:Payment of Debt by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Legal Tender means it can be accepted as a payment of debt.

      While it's not in the US, Ottawa will no longer accept cash when used to pay for taxes.

      Also, in the U.S. there is no law requiring anyone accept cash as payment. I know Heinlein thought otherwise in some statements in "Time Enough for Love," but it's not true. For a little more, read this. As someone else pointed out, the legal tender issue will only work for paying debts incurred, not ones about to be incurred.

    2. Re:Payment of Debt by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I saw a story on CNN about a guy who paid his yearly taxes with a huge truck and pennies.

      In the US, the IRS is required to accept cash.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Payment of Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legal tender only applies when dealing with the goverment, when dealing with anyone else it's what you two agree on, if they say we don't accept cash they can refuse you business if you insist in paying only in cash.

      They could insist you pay in gold leaf if they wanted and tell you to take a walk until you did, but they probably won't get much business.

    4. Re:Payment of Debt by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I saw a story on CNN about a guy who paid his yearly taxes with a huge truck and pennies.

      I've heard that story a dozen times in my life. But in most countries, the creditor could refuse to accept them. Eg, in the US 1 cent coins are only "legal tender" for amounts not exceeding 25 cents.

      In Hong Kong lots of shops are refusing 10 and 20 cent coins ($1US = $7.8 HK), because the banks charge a handling fee to deposit them. Stored payment cards are in common use, for almost all public transport, now being extended to convenience stores.

    5. Re:Payment of Debt by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I saw video of it on CNN. Actually, technically I believe it was on their Headline News network, but I did in fact directly see video of it.

      However, as a side note, I once suggested as a small child (perhaps 7 or 8) that it only made sense for the world to go completely to electronic currency. I kept trying to convince adults that physical currency is not only inconvenient, but it is easier to steal, and harder to track.

      If those concepts are readily apparent to a child, why hasn't anyone actually suggested it on a very serious level?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Payment of Debt by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >In the US, the IRS is required to accept cash.
      Luckily the UK is a bit smarter and coin is only valid up to a surprisingly low amount.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    7. Re:Payment of Debt by novakreo · · Score: 1

      I saw video of it on CNN. Actually, technically I believe it was on their Headline News network, but I did in fact directly see video of it.

      However, as a side note, I once suggested as a small child (perhaps 7 or 8) that it only made sense for the world to go completely to electronic currency. I kept trying to convince adults that physical currency is not only inconvenient, but it is easier to steal, and harder to track.

      If those concepts are readily apparent to a child, why hasn't anyone actually suggested it on a very serious level? Because those concepts are readily apparent to anyone. Phyiscal currency is harder to track than electronic currency, and many people are concerned about the privacy implications of electronic currency.
      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    8. Re:Payment of Debt by Enderandrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Luckily the UK is a bit smarter"

      A bit? Don't be modest.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    9. Re:Payment of Debt by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Luckily the UK is a bit smarter and coin is only valid up to a surprisingly low amount. Yes; in England and Wales, only UK coins of £1 and above (i.e. £1 and £2) and Bank of England notes (i.e. £5 and above) are legal tender for unlimited amounts.

      Interestingly, in Scotland apparently only Bank of England notes *under* £5 and coins in varying amounts are (strictly speaking) legal tender. Since there are no longer any Bank of England notes under £5, this means that only £1 and £2 UK coins are legal tender for unlimited amounts(!).

      That is misleading however, as Scottish courts enforce "reasonable" settlement of debts, which in practice would allow any BoE note and privately-issued Scottish banknotes.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:Payment of Debt by NinjaTariq · · Score: 1

      I think only 1 and 2 pound coins are legal tender above a certain value, its either 5 or 10 pounds. Its something like 20 of each coin with an individual value below £1, but it may vary by coin.

      Even bank notes are not legal tender, though i can't think of many places which take cash that wouldn't take notes. But the £50 is often refused outside of banks.

    11. Re:Payment of Debt by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Like what kind of concerns?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    12. Re:Payment of Debt by Sique · · Score: 1

      Cash doesn't have a history (except you keep book of the serial numbers). Electronic money has. With cash there is no easy way to track social and monetary networks. With electronic money it's easy. What do you think why the U.S. government has cracked down on Somalia's Halawa "banking" system? Because no one was able to follow the money trail, and in the aftermath of 9/11 one of the biggest tasks was to find out who is financing whom in terrorism circles.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    13. Re:Payment of Debt by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I saw video of it on CNN.

      I don't doubt it. My point was that it's not a novel idea, lots of peopel have done it before.

      However, as a side note, I once suggested as a small child (perhaps 7 or 8) that it only made sense for the world to go completely to electronic currency. I kept trying to convince adults that physical currency is not only inconvenient, but it is easier to steal, and harder to track.

      To the contrary, I think electronic currency is frighteningly easy to steal. And why do I want my spending tracked?

    14. Re:Payment of Debt by NorthWestFLNative · · Score: 1
      Other than cash not being traceable...
      • Can't pay kid's allowance with plastic (technically you can, but then they don't learn how to handle their own finances since mommy & daddy have to do it for them which is the purpose of an allowance anyway)
      • More difficult to transfer money between individuals This wouldn't be a problem for large transactions like buying a used car, but you wouldn't want to call the bank or write a check for small sums every time you borrowed a few dollars from someone.
      • Dependant on networks never going down. This is a big one. Natural disasters can affect financial networks (even in unaffected parts of the country) and prevent debit cards from working.
      • Can't work if the power is out. Stores can still accept cash when the power is out. Granted most stores will close if this is the case, but not always.
    15. Re:Payment of Debt by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 1
      I refer you to the book "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood.

      In it, a right wing group seizes control of the government, then completely removes women from the economy by the simple method of deactivating all the Financial cards (everyone carried electronic devices rather than cash) where "sex = F".

      It should be a trivial mental exercise for the reader to imagine parallel issues.

    16. Re:Payment of Debt by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I haven't carried cash in years. Even small purchases like fast-food I use plastic.

      I can transfer funds with my free online banking within seconds, and you don't even have to bother depositing a check.

      With services like PayPal I can even make small microtransactions with ease.

      My wife sells sex toys for PureRomance. When she does parties, she doesn't have a swipe or a computer handy. She literally makes a rubbing of the card, and enters the transaction later.

      We don't touch cash, and literally the only time we ever need to is to pay a parking meter.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    17. Re:Payment of Debt by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      A store, yes.

      A government institution requiring you to go to some non-governmental party and give them the cash, and then return with a piece of paper or plastic to pay for something, however, is a bit iffy.

      Especially as many of those third parties are discriminatary based on amount of money you have, charging differing fees and interest depending on what sort of money you have. If you need to pay 1000 dollars, and only have 1000 dollars, than, at most banks, you'll be below a required daily average and hit with a fee, or have to pay money for a money order, or all sorts of things that are going to cost you about 1002 dollars by the end. Whereas if you have have 10,000 dollars, you can throw that in a bank account, write a 1000 dollar check, and close the account the next day without a fee. If you have a high enough credit rating, you can get a credit card, pay with that, get some money back, and close the account making a profit! Yes, that seems trivial, but it's utterly inane to allow our government to require us to use third parties with random fee structures, where some people end up paying more based on semi-random things.

      Schools, and all government agencies, should be required to accept cash, even for non-debts. I don't know if they are required, but they should be.

      If the some government institution truly doesn't want to deal with cash, it would be rather trivial to create a national free deposit system at, say, post offices, which have to deal with valuable stuff anyway. Or at courthouses.(1) Where if you owned the government some money, you could walk in there and pay it in cash and have it forwarded to whatever agency at whatever level of government.

      And, before anyone says postal orders, postal orders are not free. Now, it would be trivial to make them free if they were written to government agencies...

      Hell, courthouses could profit from that internally. At my courthouse, a small one, there are at least three seperate areas that accept cash: The property tax/car tax/car tag office (They were smart enough to combine these with the same back-area.), the court itself for fines and such, and the marriage/fishing/hunting license office. And probably some more I don't know about. And, across the street, the library. (And I think bail is paid at the jail, but confusingly fines are paid at the courthouse.) How much expensive handling of money would be saved if there are literally one place where you gave the county government money?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Payment of Debt by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      As a child I wasn't paranoid of such things. I thought only crooks would really have something to hide, and it would make life more difficult for criminals.

      I basically operate solely on electronic funds. Every bill I have each month is paid electronically, and I receive my money electronically. All other purchases are made with my credit card, usually over a computer.

      I've never had an issue with theft of electronic funds, and if I did, I'd be reimbursed the funds.

      When someone steals my cash, I am not reimbursed anything.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    19. Re:Payment of Debt by NorthWestFLNative · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that I use my debit card for almost everything. I still like having the option of using cash though if only for one reason that I didn't mention in my previous post. As long as we use paper currency if my debit card gets lost or stolen I can drive to the bank and withdraw money to pay for things while I wait for a new card to be issued and mailed to me. Surviving for a few days without any way of paying for necessities like gas, food, or medicine gets much harder. Not every store accepts checks and not all places of business accept payment over the phone.

    20. Re:Payment of Debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there's no law mandating that any private companies or persons accept cash as payment, once there is a debt, and they want to collect on that debt from you, if you offer to pay cash, they're in a hard place. Sure, they can refuse, but if you say "oh well", their legal recourse is to try to collect on that debt; ultimately, this means suing you for non-payment. At which time when they admit that you tried to pay with cash, they've admitted that you made a valid tender of payment. They're not required to accept it, but they cannot prove non-payment by you.

  7. Go to your local mall. by JavaPunk · · Score: 1

    Most malls these days let you buy prepaid debit cards in any amount you want. Look online and I'm sure you can find it. Did ask if they would accept a cashiers check? The post office offers those.
    I forget the interview--Discovery Channel years ago, some interviewer was concerned that businesses where not taking cash anymore. The found some government offical who said that even though it says "All Debts, Public and Private," nothing is forcing them to do business by it. Businesses could use Euro's if they wanted.

    1. Re:Go to your local mall. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using Euro's is irrelevant to this. Private business transactions can use whatever they wish as the currency (There may be a regulation against illegal items, narcotics, etc, but IANAL). US law requires businesses to accept Federal Reserve notes as legal tender for all debts public and private. However, it does not state that Federal Reserve notes are the ONLY legal tender. There are several regional monies in the US, many made because people don't trust the U.S. (dollar, government, Federal Reserve). The liberty dollar was/is the most well known of them: http://www.libertydollar.org/

      These may help:
      US Law on Legal tender: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode31/us c_sec_31_00005103----000-.html
      Wikipedia article on (U.S.) Legal tender: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_tender#Legal_te nder_in_the_United_States

      Though I can't say I've heard of a difference between debts and pre-paying. The law stipuates "all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues." While this could be considered a public charge, again IANAL, so, take it with a grain of salt. If anything, could print out the legal code reference and bring it with you, depending on how far you want to push the issue.

      HTH

    2. Re:Go to your local mall. by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of Joshua A. Norton I, Emperor of the United States and Protector of Mexico who issued his own currency, which was actually accepted by a lot of places he went, on par with the US dollar. Was it legal currency? Not exactly - I'm sure he couldn't pay taxes with it, but businesses accepted it in trade with him anyway.

    3. Re:Go to your local mall. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      People who accept the liberty dollar because they don't trust the government are morons. Contrary to the liberty dollar's propoganda, it is not a backed currency. It has some value in silver, but that value is less than what it is being exchanged for, and will remain so for quite some time. It is fiat money. The only way to make it actual backed money would be to unlink it from dollar values and trade it at the value of the silver.

      As long as it says '10 dollars' on it, and can only be exchanged for eight dollars or so of silver, it is fiat money, and, more than that, it's a scam. If you think doing business in 'silver' is a good idea, buy some damn silver and use it. Don't buy eight dollars worth of silver and print '10 dollars' on the certificates and try to scam people into accepting them. Actually, looking at the current price of silver, it's closer to six dollars at this point.

      Now, liberty dollars supporters will point out that the price of silver has, at one point, gotten so high they had to 'reboot' the currency...taking in 10 dollar pieces and relabeling them 20 dollars pieces. Which is good, but still less worthwhile than just buying some actual silver to start with. (OTOH, when that happens again, I expect silver investors to run around buying all the liberty dollars they can and immediately trading them in for the silver, ripping off all the liberty dollar holders who don't keep up with the daily price of silver and don't realize they're holding something labeled '10 dollars' that is actually worth 11.)

      Incidentally, Liberty Dollars are not legal tender at all, under any theory of law. Pretending they are legal tender is called 'counterfeiting' and is illegal.

      And businesses only have to accept 'legal tender' if you have incurred a debt and no restrictions were placed on payment of that debt before it happened. Otherwise, they can accept whatever they want, in any manner, in any amount. They can accept payment only in pennies or gold or live badgers.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:Go to your local mall. by Damvan · · Score: 1

      There was a huge uproar in Southern California recently when a pizza plase started accepting Pesos for payment. Legally, there is nothing stopping them.

    5. Re:Go to your local mall. by krinsh · · Score: 1

      The most serious problem I have with prepaid debit cards is the similar one people have with paying for money orders or cashier's checks - you are constantly being forced to pay to access or use your money, unless similar to the case of 'premium' checking you have accumuluated a significant amount of money in the account that these fees are waived - but then, you have already paid the bank to use your money to make money.

      --
      I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
    6. Re:Go to your local mall. by rfc1394 · · Score: 1

      There was a huge uproar in Southern California recently when a pizza plase started accepting Pesos for payment. Legally, there is nothing stopping them. I once visited Niagra Falls. Within about 10 miles of the border, the stores on the U.S. Side would take Canadian dollars and give change in U.S. Get further away from the border and Canadian is worthless. When I visited Canada, there wasn't a single place that wasn't happy to take U.S. Currency. About the only places that will take Canadian outside of the border area are tourist traps like South of the Border in Dillon, South Carolina (they did when I visited there about ten years ago) and probably Wall Drug in Wall, South Dakota (can't say, haven't been there in maybe 35 years).
      --
      The lessons of history teach us - if they teach us anything - that nobody learns the lessons that history teaches us.
  8. It's Your Choice by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you lose the room, it's your choice. I have a small business that makes good money helping people that are sued by credit card companies, so I know how nasty they can be, but on the other hand, if you watch what you're doing, you can keep your funds reasonably safe, at least, safer than what would happen if your cash were stolen. I've worked for businesses that refused to accept cash. One was when I was managing rental property. If they accepted cash, they would have had thousands of dollars in the office for the first few days each month and I would have had to take that cash to the bank, one block away, each day. I asked the same question you did and have had them (and a few other companies) explain that as long as they state the policy and apply it evenly to all, it's legal.

    These days credit is more and more important. If you don't have it, many places won't give you a chance to get it because you have no credit record. While I'd like to say I admire you for sticking to your beliefs, you're going to have to make a choice: you can stick by your position and lose your room or you can work out a compromise. If you elect to stay firmly in your position, I seriously doubt the University will be upset. It's a bit what Prosser said to Arthur Dent: "Do you have any idea how much damage that bulldozer would suffer if it were to run over you? None at all." They have nothing to lose here and you have everything to lose.

    Overall, not building up credit, learning to deal with banks and credit card companies, and staying on an all cash basis is unwise in this culture. If I stuck to that policy, my net worth would be much lower because I would not have had a credit rating that allowed me to borrow when I needed it so I could build up my business.

    While it's just my opinion, I can only wonder if a large part of your reluctance is more fear and unwillingness to understand how to use "the system" to your benefit and that you cover for this fear by claiming it is an ethical issue.

    1. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 5, Informative
      These days credit is more and more important. If you don't have it, many places won't give you a chance to get it because you have no credit record.

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt". The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage. Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card. Aside from anything else, my debit card doesn't pretend to be giving me something.

      As for borrowing: get a loan from a bank. Borrowing on a credit card is madness, interest-wise.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:It's Your Choice by HappyEngineer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's possible that the real reason he uses cash is because he doesn't like being tracked.

    3. Re:It's Your Choice by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do realise that you can use a credit card as if it were a debit card? I do, works perfectly fine. At the end of the month, I pay what I owe them and it's all done. Just don't use credit cards for loans, as you say yourself. Us it as a convenience.

    4. Re:It's Your Choice by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I perfectly agree. The only borrowed money I have at the moment is a ~£10k student loan, which has the interest rate matched exactly to inflation, and repayments are automatically taken out of my paycheck before I get it. I believe that I could choose to pay back more than I'm forced to if I wanted, but thanks to the stupid-low interest rate I actually earn money by keeping it and sticking it in a savings account.

      If I buy anything under a few grand I'll pay for it then and there instead of using store finance or a loan, because in a year it will have already cost me less.

      The only loan I plan on getting in the future is a mortgage, because I don't expect my bank account to ever have enough in it to buy a house.

    5. Re:It's Your Choice by MrAngryForNoReason · · Score: 5, Informative

      The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage

      The problem with this is that it can be very difficult to get a mortgage if you have no credit history. Unless you have borrowed money in the past and paid it back on time banks have no way to gauge whether you are likely to pay your mortgage. It is only by borrowing every increasing amounts of money and paying it back reliably that you can increase your credit rating.

      Just to add a bit of anecdotal evidence: My sister has never had a credit card or used an overdraft facility, she viewed this as being financially responsible. When she came to apply for a loan to cover a year studying abroad she was refused on the basis that she had no credit history.

    6. Re:It's Your Choice by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      If I buy anything under a few grand I'll pay for it then and there instead of using store finance or a loan, because in a year it will have already cost me less.

      Except when stores / loans are offered at zero percent. When they are offered at Zero, this allows me to invest what I would have paid and actually make money. Zero percent loans / credit is awesome - I'll take free money any day. What bites people in the ass on these things is NOT paying off in time. If you fail to make the timely payment, you can get dinged for 21% or whatever the rate is.

      The OP eventually wants a mortgage. He will get a shit rate unless he has an established credit score, which means that he MUST USE credit. If you are trying to build a credit score, you need revolving history (credit card) and you need installment loan history (like a car loan.) For a mortgage, you need several years worth (at least 5) to get that best rate. It's not enough to have a card and not use it. You need to use it. One of the thing that shows up on the credit report is your available credit line, AND the highest amount you have had as a balance. You can't get your credit line increased unless you use the card. I use one of my cards for business travel. It is "normal" to charge up $15K or so in a month, which gets paid off every month. That card has a credit line high enough to buy a house.

      So back to my original statement - use those zero percents. The old saying that "It takes money to make money" is Very Very true. You can easily earn 15% or more by wisely investing what you would have spent.

    7. Re:It's Your Choice by thdexter · · Score: 1

      Uh, why not just use a money order? Grocery stores have them for fifty cents, for God's sake.

      --
      I'm on a road shaped like a figure eight; I'm going nowhere but I'm guaranteed to be late.
    8. Re:It's Your Choice by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a bit different where you are from, but I have often found that you can get a decent discount if you pay 'cash'. There is no free lunch - the money to pay the interest is coming from somewhere. Either the store is paying it by building it into their sale price, you are paying for it with an 'application fee', or the suckers who don't pay on time are paying it. Often it's a combination of those.

      So it's never a black and white decision... ask how much cheaper you can get it if you pay cash now, and compare the saving against what you could usefully do with the money in the meantime. Also compare it against taking out a secured personal loan over the same period (often they have establishment fees high enough to erode any saving).

    9. Re:It's Your Choice by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      These days credit is more and more important. If you don't have it, many places won't give you a chance to get it because you have no credit record.

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt".

      Ah yes, but "credit history" isn't debt, it's showing how good you are at avoiding debt. I know employers are getting this information to look for people with gambling problems and such. So the question is how long before HR people go from "no debt=good" to "only good credit history=good" for higher positions?

      Hmm.
      =Blue(23)

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    10. Re:It's Your Choice by Kagura · · Score: 1

      If you pay it all off before interest is calculated for it, then it doesn't help build your credit in most cases. Isn't that correct, or am I duped?

    11. Re:It's Your Choice by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What a strange argument to apply here. You've already on record for attending university. You are already on record for living in a dormroom. You've even posted this on the Internet. Do you think they need to track small unmarked bills or credit card records or satelite photos to get this information?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    12. Re:It's Your Choice by k_187 · · Score: 1

      You're duped. I've missed paying mine off exactly once and have excellent credit. Then again, missing that one time might have been what did it. I do believe that running a balance for a few months will get thim to up your credit limit, but that's a different beast than your credit rating.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    13. Re:It's Your Choice by the_humeister · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Mod parent up. This is exactly the reason why I have a credit card with a low spending limit that I hardly ever use. It's in fact my oldest credit card. And if the GP is interested in buying a house, good luck paying all cash in, especially if you live on either coast or near a big city. And if you don't have a good credit history (or any credit history for that matter), expect to get a higher interest rate on your mortgage than your neighbor who does have a credit history.

    14. Re:It's Your Choice by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As for borrowing: get a loan from a bank. Borrowing on a credit card is madness, interest-wise.
      Not so, most credit card companies will not charge any interest on balances paid in full by their due date. Not paying your bill in full so that you are charged interest -- that's madness. Using a credit card as a short-term 0% loan -- that's free cash.

      Say you have $1500 worth of purchases every month that can be made via credit card. If you pay the credit cards off in full every month, you have the use of an extra $1500 at no cost until you need to pay your statement. You can make money off that $1500 if you want, say by purchasing a CD.

      Not borrowing, when you can easily get a return significantly higher than the interest you need to pay, is madness.
      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    15. Re:It's Your Choice by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Bollocks. You'll never get any investment account paying more interest than you're paying out on a loan. After all, that's how the banks make their money: they don't lend you money, they rent it to you. Interest is just the rent you pay on it. They get the money to "lend" out of people's savings accounts. They aren't allowed to charge you for the "service" of looking after your money (that would constitute a protection racket), but they sure as hell don't pay you anything like as much interest on money you lend to them as they would ask you to pay them if you borrowed the same amount of money from them.

      If they're offering "0%" finance, that just means they have added the interest into the sale price. Offer them cash, even a good bit less than they're asking, and they'll practically bite your hand off.

      The corollary of this is that if you have a mortgage (with an interest rate around 7.5%), it makes more sense to divert any spare money you may have into paying it off early than to set up a savings account (probably earning less than 5%). Even a so-called "offsetting scheme" (whereby your savings count against the portion of your mortgage on which interest is charged) favours the bank, as the term of your mortgage is not reduced. But don't clear your mortgage completely. Leave a few pounds outstanding. As long as the interest on this amount is less than the cost of a safe deposit box, the bank will be looking after your deeds for you "on the cheap" until the full term is up! Do keep enough cash about your person or in your home at all times to clear this outstanding amount, though ..... you might need it to get rid of the bailiffs if the bank do try to repossess your home.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    16. Re:It's Your Choice by Y+Ddraig+Goch · · Score: 1

      Credit is really just newspeak for "debt". No, not really, credit is saying that you keep your word. More and more employers are doing credit scores to determine if a potential employee is a high risk or not. Bad credit score might mean the employee is more likely to embezel or sell company data. I don't like it any more than you but that's the facts of life...

      --
      Meddle thou not in the affairs of Dragons, for thou art crunchy and with most anything.
    17. Re:It's Your Choice by jcdick1 · · Score: 1

      I can understand your position, and its fair. However, without having a credit card, car loans, something more helping in building a credit history, you aren't going to get a mortgage that isn't about the same as buying it with a credit card.

      --
      What?
    18. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention the MAGNETIC TRACKING STRIPS they put in all US currency!

      *looks over shoulder*

    19. Re:It's Your Choice by metaomni · · Score: 1

      How do you suppose you'll get a mortgage without a preexisting credit history? They don't just hand out hundreds of thousands of dollars without a little bit of information (read: how you handle credit/debt).

    20. Re:It's Your Choice by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1
      It's a British Student Loan, regulated by the government. It DOES have stupid-low interest.

      Interest rate on a student loan: http://www.slc.co.uk/statistics/facts_figures.html #interest

      2003/04 : 3.1%
      2004/05 : 2.6%
      2005/06 : 3.2%
      2006/07 : 2.4% Inflation: http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=19

      I can easily get more than 5% interest rate in a decent savings scheme (2-year bond or whatever).

      It would be different if it was a bank loan, but it's not.
    21. Re:It's Your Choice by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      Hmm, seems you may not have been replying to me. Slashdot reparented the comment. I apologise if what I said is irrelevant.

    22. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Friendly word of advice: don't be so quick to post authoritative-sounding financial advice when you're wrong.

      In particular, the student loans in the UK (which sounds like what the GP poster was referring to) are not run no the same commercial basis as a loan from a bank. They are money-making: if you have one and really believe that you're only paying interest at the rate of inflation, go look at how the interest is actually calculated relative to when you actually get payments taken out of your salary, and ask yourself why Gordy thinks he can sell student loans to a commercial investor for £6B. However, the effective interest rate can still be less than current commercial rates, and therefore it does make sense for some people who have outstanding student loans to invest their money in a safe savings account rather than paying off the loan.

      Also, while offsetting schemes still obviously make money for a bank, that doesn't imply that they're bad for the borrower. Consider the tax implications for a higher-rate taxpayer, who gets hit for a massive 40% of any interest they make on a typical savings account, but whose reduction in interest payment on an offset mortgage is just cutting a loss and therefore not taxable in the same way.

      Seriously, if anyone reading this doesn't already know all this stuff but thinks it might be important, go talk to a financial adviser about where to put your money. The cost of a half-hour chat with someone who knows what they are talking about could save you a fortune over the long run, particularly if that half-hour chat comes with the label "free initial consultation". (I am not such an adviser, and you should trust the words in this post exactly as much as anything else you read on the web, i.e., not a lot.)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    23. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to have this attitude towards credit as well, and I can tell you it is wrong. Although I still don't have a credit card, I will probably be getting one in the near future. When my brother and I bought a duplex together 2 years ago, the amount of money we were able to borrow was hurt by the fact that I had no credit history. If I had been on my own, I would have been seriously hurt. Now, I am using my mortgage payment to build up a good credit history, so that when I buy a house I will be able to get a loan that matches my ability to pay.

      Credit cards offer some really great services, even better than debit cards. Things like user protection and fraud protection are incredibly valuable, especially when making purchases online.

      All that said, the average family possesses something like $9,000 of credit card debt. It's a terrible situation to be in, and banks and lenders are getting into trouble because they have been allowing people with bad credit to get loans far outside their ability to pay, which further ruins their credit history.

    24. Re:It's Your Choice by josecanuc · · Score: 1

      Yay Dave Ramsey http://www.daveramsey.com/

    25. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      How do you suppose you'll get a mortgage without a preexisting credit history?

      Well, duh, I guess they might just take the house as collateral. Banks are giving out 100% interest-only mortgages to students over here at the moment. As long as prices are rising no one cares about your credit rating when it comes to mortgages, unless you have a really, really bad one.

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    26. Re:It's Your Choice by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Are you high? Even a pidling SAVINGS account would make you money on a zero percent loan. It's very simple here... Let's see if you can keep up.

      Let's say I am buying product X, which costs $5,000. The store is offering zero percent financing for a year. The product costs $5000 no matter if I take the financing or pay cash. Instead of paying $5000 up front, I take the offer. I take that $5000 and invest in a 1 year CD that has a 5% return. At the end of the year, I have earned $250 from the CD. I pay off the $5000 owed to the store. I net $250.

      Why does the store offer this zero percent financing? Couple of reasons...

      There are dullards out there that won't pay it off in a year and then end up paying the 21% finance charge and end up paying ~$6329 for that $5000 product. There are enough dullards out there to make up for me not paying a dime to get that $5K loan.

      Second, Store A gets my business instead of Stores B, C, or D. It can be a difference between sale and no-sale. Think of autos. Toyota may offer me 0% so I buy a Toyota instead of a Ford, GM, or Nissan product. Of course if you are swift, you negotiate price before you negotiate financing... End result is that you pay the same amount for the product, you just don't have to pay all at once with the 0% loan and can instead invest.

      Zero percent means that I am paying NO INTEREST AT ALL. What is it that you are having trouble understanding? The zero percent part???

    27. Re:It's Your Choice by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I had the same experience when applying for a mortgage. Apparently, when they tell you that you need a solid history of honoring your obligations, they don't mean crap like rent, insurance, utilities, cable bill, etc. You have to have a credit card.

      Does it matter that I saved 1/3 of my gross for two years? Does it matter that I paid every bill on time for about three? Does it matter that the mortgage would be less than 1/6 of my gross even at a high interest rate? No, no, and no. I've even been turned down for department store credit cards. Reason: "didn't get a credit card at a young enough age."

      (I've since gotten my credit unions to issue me cards.)

      What's odd is, my credit history would be substantially longer, and my credit MUCH better if I had done *exactly* the same things as I did before, but moved some purchases I'd make anyway, onto a credit card. Or if my parents had added me as an authorized user at 16 and refused to actually let me use the card. (They're closing the latter loophole ... finally.)

      Remember: "no credit" is much, much worse than "bad credit".

    28. Re:It's Your Choice by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1

      "As long as prices are rising no one cares about your credit rating when it comes to mortgages, unless you have a really, really bad one."
      So you're assuming that these market conditions are going to persist when you decide to buy a house? Furthermore, a non-existent credit history is going to impact the interest rate you receive on your mortgage. Your refusal to manage credit (you sound like you're trying to make some kind of moral stand although I am a little unclear on your point) is going to end up costing you quite a bit, if you are able to actually get a mortgage.
    29. Re:It's Your Choice by skiingyac · · Score: 1

      Credit cards aren't all bad. I've had a 0% loan for the past 2 1/2 years thanks to credit cards... I get enough 0% offers in the mail that I shouldn't have any trouble keeping it that way until its paid off. Plus you can get 1-2% cash back with a lot of credit cards.

      Sure, the processors get ~3% in transaction fees, but a lot of banks also charge ~1-3% when a business deposits cash/checks, plus the cash & checks aren't free, you have to buy checks, and dollar bills don't print themselves. And debit cards are much less safe to use since the money comes straight out of your checking account... one fraudulent charge can easily rack up a few hundred in overdraft fees.

      Of course there's the don't feed the trolls argument, and the CC companies of course are trying to entice people into bad situations where they have to pay their ridiculous interest rates & fees, but by my calculations, the CC companies have a net loss of about $200 a year from the business I give them.

    30. Re:It's Your Choice by Bourbon+Man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In addition, you can actually profit from the credit card company. Cash-back, airline miles, and other incentives are actually profit, as long as you pay your entire balance each month, and the card has no annual fees.

      You can also lose money by not having good credit. Many insurance companies use your credit score to adjust how high a premium you must pay. If you eventually need a loan and are able to get one, your interest will be substantially higher if you have bad or no credit. Certain jobs require a good credit rating to ensure you are financially responsible; if you are not financially responsible, you are considered to be more of a theft/embezzling/bribery/security risk.

      Everyone has a credit rating, whether they want it or not. It's a tool that may be used to your advantage if used properly. Ignoring it cannot benefit you, only harm you in the long run.

    31. Re:It's Your Choice by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      The product costs $5000 no matter if I take the financing or pay cash.
      Not necessarily. I'm quite sure that that if you counted out $4500 in cash right there in front of the salesman, he'd sell you it for that. Or one of his competitors would.
      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    32. Re:It's Your Choice by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      It's possible that the real reason he uses cash is because he doesn't like being tracked.

      Maybe he obtained his cash illegally, and not having a bank account or credit history makes the money trail harder to follow.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    33. Re:It's Your Choice by grommit · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting a decent interest rate on a mortgage with zero credit history.

    34. Re:It's Your Choice by afidel · · Score: 1

      Offering a discount for cash or a penalty for using a CC is against the merchants agreement with the credit card processor. If someone complains they can lose their merchant account and thus most of their customers. Besides, failing to build up credit just means you are most likely going to pay out whatever savings you made several times over in a higher interest rate on your mortgage. I have an almost perfect credit score, yet I have never paid a fee or any interest on any of my debt except my mortgage.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    35. Re:It's Your Choice by argStyopa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Borrowing on a credit card is madness, interest-wise."

      Not really.
      There are many no-annual-fee cards out there that charge no interest if you pay it off every month.

      So in fact, you MAKE MONEY using a credit card for regular purchases, because your money is sitting in the bank gaining interest through the whole month.

      And 'debt' is only an issue if you spend more than you have currently.

      Secondly, if you have a pocketful of cash you are mugging bait, and if you are robbed you lose.
      If you have a credit card you
      a) have as much cash as you need when you need it.
      b) if you're robbed, as long as you conscientiously inform the card company, you are not liable for anything charged on it - you're out nothing.
      c) if you travel, you get the best possible exchange rate, and don't have to be concerned about carrying the 'right' currency.

      No, you should be able to use cash for anything you purchase, but IMO using cash instead of a credit card is rather dumb.

      --
      -Styopa
    36. Re:It's Your Choice by cnj · · Score: 1

      b) if you're robbed, as long as you conscientiously inform the card company, you are not liable for anything charged on it - you're out nothing.

      And that's the biggest saving-grace over a debit card (in the U.S. at least)--with a credit card the liability is with the issuer by law, debit cards don't have the same form of protection.

      And that's why I don't trust debit cards.

      --
      Never trust anyone over 90000.
    37. Re:It's Your Choice by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card.

      Credit cards essentially give you an interest-free loan until the end of the current billing cycle, and the card issuers have all kinds of policies that allow you to recover your money if you've been a victim of fraud. Once that debit card is swiped and your bank account has been debited -- that money's gone.

      Yes, it's a bit more difficult to balance the books when different parts of a transaction--authorization, billing, and finally payment--can take place on different days, even weeks apart. But responsible use of a credit card has some real benefits over debit card use.

    38. Re:It's Your Choice by macmastery · · Score: 1

      There is always the option of "manual underwriting"
                http://www.daveramsey.com/etc/askdave/?intContentI d=6260

      They qualify you based on actual analysis of your financial situation, and not just a credit score.

    39. Re:It's Your Choice by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt". The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage.

      I agree with you. However, you won't get a good deal on a mortgage unless you have a solid credit history, and the easiest way to get a solid credit history is to get a credit card, use it, and pay it off every month.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    40. Re:It's Your Choice by metamatic · · Score: 1

      The corollary of this is that if you have a mortgage (with an interest rate around 7.5%), it makes more sense to divert any spare money you may have into paying it off early than to set up a savings account (probably earning less than 5%).

      Not in the USA, where you can deduct your mortage interest from your income when computing your taxes.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    41. Re:It's Your Choice by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Cash-back, airline miles, and other incentives are actually profit

      I wouldn't exactly call this "profit" since you're buying goods/services to get it. You're never raising your net worth. It's more like "discount". I get 1% cash back on all my CC purchases. I wouldn't call that a 1% return, I would call it a 1% discount.

    42. Re:It's Your Choice by macmastery · · Score: 1

      Well, in the case of Visa anyway, you are protected whether your visa card is a credit or a check card.

      I used to think there was increased risk to using a check card (esp. online), but listening to Dave RamseyI found out about this feature (which you can read for yourself on the Visa website).

    43. Re:It's Your Choice by apparently · · Score: 1
      Credit is really just newspeak for "debt".

      Only if you say it is. I use my credit card for the majority of my purchases, but I don't have any credit card debt. How do I manage this crazy feat?!? I use my credit card only if I have (or will have) the funds available in cash by the payment due date. Credit is only "newspeak for debt" if you're too immature to use it responsibly. But if you can use them responsibly, you get the added benefit of getting 2-3% of your expenditures back if you pick the right rewards card, and you're not lugging cash around all over. So really, you're just punishing yourself.

    44. Re:It's Your Choice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt".

      Well, it certainly can be. Think of it as more of a seller history on e-Bay or your karma here on Slashdot (yeah, more lame analogies, I apologize).

      Your credit rating largely comes from a proven history of paying bills. You can wisely manage credit without swimming in debt or paying interest all that often. I know people who pay all of their monthly expenses on a credit card, and then pay the balance in full at the end of the month -- no interest is paid.

      The sad reality is, without some observable history of you actually repaying creditors or other accounts, you're a non-entity and don't have a proven track record.

      The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage.

      You will stand very little chance of getting a mortgage without a credit history. You'll be like Reg the Blank from Max Headroom -- if there's no audit trail, you don't exist to them.

      Aside from anything else, my debit card doesn't pretend to be giving me something.

      As for borrowing: get a loan from a bank. Borrowing on a credit card is madness, interest-wise.

      Get one of those pre-paid Visa thingies -- you load it up, and then use it like a credit card. It will build up a credit history. You won't pay interest, but you'll establish that oh-so-desirable credit history. (As long as you don't fall into the usual consumer trap of maxing out cards and carrying an obscene amount of debt.) I knew someone once who wanted a credit card, had a good paying job, and in order to get a credit card with a $1000 limit, had to put $1000 up as collateral since he was considered a complete risk with no previous history. After several years they refunded the $1000.

      Absolutely agree about bank loans and CC interest rates. But, you might have a hard time getting a loan from the bank without any credit history unless you can get them to give you a small personal loan and then work up to something bigger.

      Unfortunately, it is a realilty that nowadays you really do need to get yourself into the credit bureaus listings and make sure to pay your bills on time. Cash transactions over a certain amount (I think it's $5K here in Canada) get flagged and need to be reported to te government. Then you're just gonna get scutinized by people who think it's abnormal for you to use big chunks of cash. It's not worth the grief.

      Good luck on not using credit, but I fear you might end up needing to treat it as a necessary evil, and then take real good care of it.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    45. Re:It's Your Choice by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, there isn't. Read the reply:

      "Branch managers aren't allowed to make judgment calls anymore." i.e., They're not going to call in the cavalry for one small mortgage.

      I did do what Ramsey described (though it wasn't called that). My "financial situation" is pretty simple: stable employment, no other debt, lots in mutual funds, no other obligations, no judgments, no liens, no bankruptcy, loan for about 2x yearly gross. I explained this to their "special situations expert". The result:

      The very best they would consider giving me is 80% financing on a 3/1 ARM at 10% interest. I was classified as subprime.

      My situation isn't "special". I don't have unstable, commission-based income. I don't have past debt. I don't have complicated, illiquid holdings. I don't have bizarre partnerships.

      Do you see something wrong with that picture?

    46. Re:It's Your Choice by Bourbon+Man · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. No increase to net worth is involved. You are experiencing less of a decrease in your net worth. In the end, your net worth is greater than if you had not used a CC with a cash-back deal. Very similar to profit but not the same. I stand corrected.

      To make this into a profit situation, keep the money in an interest bearing account until you pay the CC off. Then you enjoy both interest (profit) and cash-back (discount).

      Definitely better than the shoe box or mattress bank.

    47. Re:It's Your Choice by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      In the UK, you only compute your own tax if you're self-employed. The Government figured a long time ago that it was less bother to calculate the tax owed by the working classes, than to risk letting them do it themselves and end up chasing piddling sums of money all over the place for the rest of time. Your employer pays you your wages (in cash once a week, or into a bank account once a month) net of all taxes, although they are still legally allowed to quote the gross figure in advertisements and at interview -- so a minimum wage of "£5 an hour" is actually quite a bit less than that.

      There used to be a similar provision for mortgage interest being non-taxable; it was called MIRAS (Mortgage Interest Relief At Source). No similar exemption was made for rent if you lived in a rented property, therefore the scheme discriminated unfairly against the less-well-off.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    48. Re:It's Your Choice by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      As a former mortgage loan officer:

      You'll never get a mortgage without a credit history.

      With a very short credit history (e.g. a couple months when you realize you need a mortgage but don't have the credit for one) you'll be paying an hojillion more dollars in interest than someone with comparable financial background who does have a credit history.

      Like it or not, your ability to get any real loan is directly tied to a three digit number attached to your name/ss#. That three digit number (FICO score) is a voodoo function mixing your: history of payments (bills, tuition, even blockbuster late fees), debt to income ratio, total debt, number of debt sources (e.g. 2 credit cards is better than 15), and at least a few hundred other factors and number fudging. Without any of the factor uses to calculate your credit score, you have no credit score which is worse than having a bad credit score.

    49. Re:It's Your Choice by harl · · Score: 1

      My credit rating went up after I paid off my credit card balance.

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    50. Re:It's Your Choice by Intellectual+Elitist · · Score: 1

      > Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card. Aside from anything else, my debit card doesn't pretend to be giving me something.

      If you used a dividend credit card instead and just paid it off every month, you'd actually get a rebate on everything you buy while strengthening your credit rating and never paying interest. Much better than a debit card, I'd say, unless you have absolutely no self control where credit is concerned...

    51. Re:It's Your Choice by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      Student loans in the UK are being privatised and sooner or later will be exactly the same as any ordinary loan ..... if not more expensive, on the basis that the privatised loan company has a captive audience (same reason why a cup of tea in a motorway service station is so expensive, there's nowhere else to get one).

      If you have savings and a loan, even if part of the loan isn't attracting interest because of the savings, you'd still be better off without the loan. The only exception would be if you're tied in with early repayment penalties or some such.

      Your loan of £L attracts interest at the rate of £(L * r1) per annum (note, here r1 is expressed as a fraction, not a percentage; i.e. 0.0725 rather than 7.25%). Your savings of £S earn interest at the rate of £(S * r2) gross per annum. If you use an offset account, then your loan attracts interest at £((L - S) * r1) per annum, saving you £(S * r1); but you miss out on £(S * r2) of interest. So the difference is £(S * (r1 - r2)) p.a. Since r1 > r2 just due to the way the banking system works, you'd be better off offsetting even if you didn't have to pay tax on the interest accrued by your savings. However, offsetting does not alter the term of your loan. If, instead, you simply made a capital repayment of £S against your loan, you would still be paying the same £((L - S) * r1) interest per annum; but the difference is, you only have £(L - S) outstanding now, and so could end up paying it off sooner. Then it won't be attracting any interest .....

      Higher-rate tax is a bit of a red herring. If you never even earned the money in the first place (e.g. because you had no savings due to having spent them on a repayment on your loan instead), you can't be taxed on it! Penalty fees may apply for early repayments; but if you end up making a saving which better than covers the fee, it's still worth it. As always, do the maths, without a calculator, and have someone check your results.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    52. Re:It's Your Choice by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      It's only debt when you don't pay the bill. I hardly carry cash anymore since everyone takes credit. At the end of the month, I pay my bill in FULL and I get points. The credit card company gets NOTHING in return.

    53. Re:It's Your Choice by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      If you've had to card for a period of time (one year?), you're able to call and request a limit hike.

    54. Re:It's Your Choice by smellsofbikes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I had the same experience: no credit history whatsoever, even though I owned a house outright and had another house-worth of money in stock. I managed to get a mortgage, but only because they A: called all the companies I paid bills to (utility, phone, car insurance) to check my payment history, and B: because I could buy the house outright if I wanted to, so they knew I was financially solvent. If either of those had come up short, no house for me.

      Having a credit history isn't a bad idea, unfortunately. My brother has a credit card that gives him money back, somehow, and he uses it for utilities/phone, pays it back at the end of each month, has a great credit rating, and gets like a 4% discount, effectively, on all his bills.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    55. Re:It's Your Choice by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      I have a car loan from my bank at 4.25% and a CD at 6% with them. In the CD is the cash I was going to use to pay for the car.

      It certainly is possible to find loans at better rates and make money investing the cash instead.

      Also, when taxes enter into the equation (mortgage interest is tax deductible in the US), it's not always in your best interest to pay off the mortgage instead of saving, especially if you have a very low fixed-rate mortgage.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    56. Re:It's Your Choice by Nevyn · · Score: 1

      It's not quite so simple, deducting interest from your mortgage only reduces the rate by roughly 1% (given a sane rate). Also it's general financial advise to diversify, so even though it might not be the "theoretically best" option putting a small percentage of your investments into your low interest debt. isn't a bad thing.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    57. Re:It's Your Choice by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      You're right about the bank. You're better off getting a loan from a bank than using credit cards. Banks don't use many of the practices that credit cards use. Still, banks are more likely to make a loan to someone with a good credit rating. There are also times when emergencies or difficult situations come up where credit can be a lifesaver.

      I can see what you mean about it being newspeak for debt, but there's much more to it than that. I know there are times where short term debt, for me, lead to long term profit. If I can get a loan from the bank to cover some expenses to expand my business, then usually I'm better off expanding the business sooner than waiting until I have the cash to do it.

      I've had the same happen in terms of borrowing to buy stock. If I had not borrowed and bought when the chance was there, I would have missed out on large profits.

      The lawyer I work with that handles negotiations with my clients and other situations for me is a bankruptcy lawyer. I've learned a lot from him. I never realized the classes I had in school that covered money management are not taught in most schools and I never knew how few people actually learn any principles of money management. It's amazing how few people understand the concept of not spending more than your income, but that's a simple rule. Beyond that there is managing debt, for example, or knowing when it's a benefit to have debt. I've also learned from him a lot of tricks in dealing with the credit card companies.

      I'm not thrilled with debt. I've paid cash for my last two cars over the past year and a half (but one wasn't new, it was an almost antique Mercedes 380SL). On the other hand, I've studied money management and don't shy away from what will increase my bottom line, even if it is debt so the money can be used to make more money.

    58. Re:It's Your Choice by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      If you really want to you can use it exactly like a debit card -- load it up (overpay) and then only spend that much.

      I do that occasionally if I know I'm going to be charging enough to the card to be scraping against the credit limit but I don't want to call and get it raised.

    59. Re:It's Your Choice by mythar · · Score: 1

      Credit is really just newspeak for "debt".

      no, credit is newspeak for "can handle money responsibly." if you have several credit cards, use them, and pay them off in full each month, then you can end up with no debt and no finance charges. but, by using credit cards, you are building up a history of responsible handing of money. there is absolutely no reason why you shouldn't be doing this. (well, there is one, but i'm assuming that you aren't bad at handling money)

      in a similar vein, if you don't own a car, don't plan to drive, etc, get a driver's license anyways.

    60. Re:It's Your Choice by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. There are some stores that prefer to give you actual zero percent interest (not like car companies where 0% means prime). They do that because they know when the six months or one year no interest term is up half their customers won't be able to pay off the balance and so they'll then get to charge stupid amounts of interest. If you have the discipline to invest the money and then PAY IT OFF every time, you can make yourself five or ten bucks for your trouble.

    61. Re:It's Your Choice by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Car financing isn't zero percent though. They SAY zero percent, but the small print says zero percent over prime.

      That sounds to me like it should actually be against the law here in Canada, where the actual price has to be the biggest price, but it's so entrenched in custom that they get away with it.

    62. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Since r1 > r2 just due to the way the banking system works

      Except that, as noted previously, that isn't typically the case with current UK student loans vs. current UK savings accounts. Your own maths show exactly why leaving money in a student loan can be advantageous.

      I'm afraid I don't see the point of your offsetting argument. A typical offset mortgage effectively is just allowing someone to pay off more per month than usual, thus reducing the amount outstanding on which interest is paid. The period of a loan doesn't matter, unless there is some sort of annual charge or similar; it is the total interest paid over the period of the loan, relative to the other uses to which any reduction payments could have been put, that counts.

      Higher-rate tax is a bit of a red herring. If you never even earned the money in the first place (e.g. because you had no savings due to having spent them on a repayment on your loan instead), you can't be taxed on it!

      Exactly. So if I have x pounds to put somewhere, my mortgage rate is m, a savings account would get me interest at a rate of s, and this is taxed at a rate of t, then I can either reduce my mortgage interest by mx pounds this year, or bring in s(1-t)x extra pounds in savings interest after tax. That makes paying off part of the mortgage advantageous unless m < s(1-t), which is unrealistic at commercial rates today if t = 0.4 for a higher-rate taxpayer, and unlikely but perhaps not impossible for standard rate taxpayers (ignoring odd percentage points for whatever NI is doing this week).

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    63. Re:It's Your Choice by k_187 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, usually. Except discover likes to up my limit, then not tell me. So I can't request one because it was just upped.

      --
      11 was a racehorse
      12 was 12
      1111 Race
      12112
    64. Re:It's Your Choice by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Your credit rating largely comes from a proven history of paying bills. ...

      The sad reality is, without some observable history of you actually repaying creditors or other accounts, you're a non-entity and don't have a proven track record.


      No. I was a non-entity last November when applying for a loan, despite a "proven history" of paying bills for over two years.

      Now, if by "bills" you mean "credit card bills", then yes, you're right. I just needed to remind others that all the other bills don't really count. Not paying them would hurt you, but paying them doesn't any more prove you exist to the credit industry.

    65. Re:It's Your Choice by Lockejaw · · Score: 1

      Offering a discount for cash or a penalty for using a CC is against the merchants agreement with the credit card processor.
      I believe GP was referring to using the store's financing plan, not using a credit card.
      --
      (IANAL)
    66. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      You'll never get a mortgage without a credit history.

      This is not the case in the UK and especially Northern Ireland. Obviously, if you've got a history of BAD debt then there might be trouble, but not much. Our banks and building societies simply don't care so long as property values are going up 15% to 50% per year; they'll just repossess and make much more than their costs back at auction. This will not last, but it is the case at the moment. When it changes there are going to be banks going to the wall, but long term planning always goes out the window in a boom of any kind, gold, houses, or tulips.

      Also, with so much money being lent, no lender would dare vary their rate by credit history. The market's too competitive.

      However, you are right in saying that LaTeX is for the lazy (and sloppy, IMHO); plain TeX all the way!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    67. Re:It's Your Choice by japhmi · · Score: 1

      Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card. Aside from anything else, my debit card doesn't pretend to be giving me something.
      There is one huge advantage to a Credit Card vs a Debit Card. If your Credit Card ( or CC# ) gets stolen, it's much easier to clean up then if your Debit Card gets stolen.

      Pay it off each and every month, get your cash-back from your card, and you're ahead of the Debit Card.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    68. Re:It's Your Choice by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Now, if by "bills" you mean "credit card bills", then yes, you're right. I just needed to remind others that all the other bills don't really count. Not paying them would hurt you, but paying them doesn't any more prove you exist to the credit industry.

      Good to know. I had assumed that normal utilities would show up in your favour.

      Thanks for the info.

      Cheers
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    69. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, but "credit history" isn't debt, it's showing how good you are at avoiding debt.
      Well, since I've never been in debt, you'd think that I'd have a great credit score... right? Right?
      Nope, since I've been avoiding debt, I have no credit score.
    70. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same here in Finland. I read these reports of American credit rating practices with incredulity. Don't they have any banks that would be happy to loan money at a reasonable rate to the minority who abhor credit but pay all their bills in time? Whatever happened to competition between banks in the US?

    71. Re:It's Your Choice by John+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      ... which is why you can usually get car dealers to give you cash back OR the zero percent financing. Pay cash, take the $3k rebate, and smile all the way to the bank.

    72. Re:It's Your Choice by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      As for borrowing: get a loan from a bank. Borrowing on a credit card is madness, interest-wise.

      I don't know, I routinely get offers from Chase for 1.99% for 9 months, or 4.99% forever. Exactly what bank will give me an unsecured loan for ten or twenty thousand dollars at that kind of rate except on a card?

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    73. Re:It's Your Choice by John+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Then you're not shopping around enough. There are places where you can have that kind of a history and be valued... admittedly, not with 100% financing or other idiotic options, but you're probably not looking for that anyways.

      I have personally watched people at World Savings make loans to people with good downpayments and less-than-usual documentation with perfectly acceptable terms. Adjustable rate, yes, but not truly evil rates like the 10% you're quoting.

    74. Re:It's Your Choice by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      If you can work a deal, by all means do so. Gerry's Furniture Mart may be happy to do such a deal, but you will be hard pressed to find a national retailer like Home Depot that will. They WANT you to do the zero percent deal because their experience and history shows that enough bozo's pay late to result in a very tidy profit.

    75. Re:It's Your Choice by TheNicestGuy · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I don't want [credit]... The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage.

      From personal experience I can attest that some, probably most, mortgage lenders won't give you the time of day if your credit history is blank. I'm in the early stages of buying a house with my girlfriend. With our combined incomes and clean records, we figured we'd have no trouble. But she feels the same as you: She never saw any need for any sort of credit account. She figured she was being fiscally responsible by avoiding credit cards and living in her mother's house rent-free.

      As a result, all of the lenders we've talked to about pre-approval have (at least officially) refused to consider her income in their formulas determining how much they would offer us. Even if she rushed out and got a credit card right now, according to one loan officer it wouldn't impress the lenders until it had been on her sheet for some minimum length of time. I think it was six months?

      I'd heard in the past that getting a credit card just to establish a history, even if you never used it, was beneficial to good credit, but I'd always had a hard time believing it. Now we have to settle for a smaller loan than we can afford.

    76. Re:It's Your Choice by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      If you have had 0% and actually got charged prime, you got ripped off TOTALLY. I have had several true zero percent car loans over the years (which is the only kind I'll take.)

    77. Re:It's Your Choice by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an ad for such a thing. I've never had a car loan myself -- I've always paid cash and negotiated a discount.

    78. Re:It's Your Choice by pclminion · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience: no credit history whatsoever, even though I owned a house outright and had another house-worth of money in stock.

      But that doesn't mean ANYTHING to a lender. They don't care what kind of assets you have, they care about YOUR DEBT-PAYING BEHAVIOR. They want to know if they're going to get their money back. You could have a billion bucks, but if your credit history shows that you never pay your debts, that billion dollars doesn't matter because they're NEVER GOING TO SEE IT. Besides, if you've got a billion dollars, what do you need their money for?

      And I think this is all quite reasonable. Why would I loan you money without seeing evidence that OTHER people have loaned you money in the past and you actually paid them back?

    79. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Try getting a loan from the bank with no credit! Credit =! debt by the way, I have good credit and no debt. You just have to be smart about the times you do take on a little debt.

    80. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt". Do you actually know anything about credit? Treat your credit card like cash and pay your bills on time and in full, and you will have no debt. This earns you a higher credit score, which in turn earns you a better lending rate.

    81. Re:It's Your Choice by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I'm not arguing that a credit history has some validity -- it's a reasonably good indicator the person pays bills on time. So are utility bill records. But it's also an indicator of behavior patterns if a person has lots of money sitting around gaining interest. They sure were avidly interested in my investments. They wanted to see exactly how much I had and what sorts of investments I'd made. So, they very definitely cared what sorts of assets I had, because it helped establish that I was a person who could afford to make payments even if I didn't have a regular source of income, much less whether I'd used credit in the past. Their business plan is profit by loaning money. They do that by trying to get as much money out of people as possible, and a person who already has money is likely a good risk, just as a person who always pays bills is a good risk.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    82. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Credit is really just newspeak for 'debt'."

      This is off base.
      Credit, in terms of credit history, has less to do with how much you owe, and more with how responsibly you've paid back what you've borrowed in the past.
      It's a way for places to rate you as a trustworthy investment or not.

    83. Re:It's Your Choice by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      You're duped. Using a credit card as a debit card (paying the bill in full before interest is applied to the outstanding balance) is one of the fastest ways of increasing your credit score. I made a few mistakes with money when I was younger and didn't really have a good credit score. When it came time to buy a house, I found that my credit wasn't good enough. For the next year, I used my credit card for all purchases (food, gas, entertainment, etc.) and paid the bill in full at the end of the month. After that year, I was able to get a low-interest 30-year fixed-rate mortgage. I recommend this method to anyone that needs to build credit fast.

      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    84. Re:It's Your Choice by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Frequently in the US, credit card companies will offer 0% introductory interest with a series of complicated terms counting on either people not being ready to pay off the balance or making a mistake in the payment structure, and then having the rate change to 18% or higher (applied retroactivly). You can pretty easily beat that introductory rate with almost any term deposit.
      US banking has better opportunities than European banking for some users to pay no fees.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    85. Re:It's Your Choice by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Not all of us with credit card debt are immature. Some of us got laid off, and had to take shitty jobs to make ends meet. Then when the IT jobs came back we either had to stay with the shitty job or use the credit card to move. I decided to move. I have debt now. I also only use my debit card for purchases.

    86. Re:It's Your Choice by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Their business plan is profit by loaning money. They do that by trying to get as much money out of people as possible, and a person who already has money is likely a good risk, just as a person who always pays bills is a good risk.

      But assuming that a person with money is low-risk is a bad assumption. You have to really put yourself in the mindset of the lender. If the person has a bunch of cash, but they're asking for a loan, that means that cash is somehow tied up -- otherwise they wouldn't need the loan. Therefore you can't count on that money, in and of itself, to repay the loan -- it's tied up. It just doesn't count for anything, except possibly the basic computation of whether you can make even a single payment.

      On the other hand, if you also have a good track record of repaying debts, then you are statistically less likely to fail to make the payments on another loan, regardless of what sort of assets you may have.

      As you pointed out, the business plan is to profit by lending. Your financial astuteness doesn't matter, what does matter is whether you can be counted on to make the payments. There is definitely a relationship between the two, but your past history of paying debts (and bills aren't debts) is a much stronger piece of evidence.

    87. Re:It's Your Choice by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 0

      1) It's interesting that using several aggregator services plus personal contacts can be "not shopping around enough".
      2) Why is 100% financing idiotic? It may be idiotic for the bank, but not if I plan to invest what would have gone into a down payment, elsewhere. Yes, that would have been something I'd like -- not a deal breaker, though. Is it that hard to imagine someone capable of affording a large down payment but instead prefering to invest it in a non-status symbol?
      3) I don't have "less-than-usual documentation". That was the whole point.
      4) An ARM is not "perfectly acceptable": the whole point of the mortgage is to fix my living costs (to some extent) and profit from interest rate movement and inflation! I don't know why you didn't count that as one of the "idiotic options".

    88. Re:It's Your Choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card.

      I do not want a debit card. Money should come out of my accounts in very limited ways -- physically withdrawing cash (or cashier's check), or me writing a check. A credit card gives me all the advantages of a debit card (a piece of plastic that I can pay for stuff with), without the downside of screwing with my account balances.

      Additionally... I get about twenty days of float on my money, and I get a buffer between me and some dishonest clerk. I've had a number of disputes (Sprint charging the card for a declined service, Prodigy opening an account with a stolen CC number, etc.) that dragged on for months, and having the Credit Card company between me and them was a lifesaver. Getting a credit-card number stolen isn't uncommon, but it's a lot less painful dealing with the CC company than dealing with someone draining your checking account dry just in time for you to bounce a mortgage check.

      So far as I am concerned, the only people who should have debit cards are those who are so lacking in self-control that they cannot resist the impulse to purchase any goods that take their fancy. For everyone else, credit cards are far superior -- just pay 'em off in full when they're due. (Although, paying off credit-cards in full probably hurts one's credit scores...)

    89. Re:It's Your Choice by macmastery · · Score: 1

      Try Churchill Mortgage and see what they say.
                http://www.churchhillmortgage.com/

    90. Re:It's Your Choice by Above · · Score: 1

      Credit is not debt, credit is paying off your debt. If all you do is get debt and don't pay it off your credit rating is going to be lousy.

      I have a credit card. I pay it off 100% in full at the end of every month. See, unlike most of the idiots out there I don't use it to buy stuff I can't afford, I use it because it's far more convenient and safer than carrying around $1,000 in cash to make it through the month. Since I pay it off in full there is no interest.

      Let me repeat that, no interest, no debt, and yet it builds my credit rating so when I want a mortgage, or a car, or other expensive thing I have the option to take on debt to do it.

      If you did the exact same purchases on a credit card you do on your debit card and you chose your credit card wisely it would cost you no more money and build your credit rating. Then, down the road you might have a credit card with a $20,000 limit when a real emergency occurs, where as with your current plan you'll have whatever is in your bank account at that moment, as no creditor will have enough history to give you a loan.

    91. Re:It's Your Choice by schoolisdeath · · Score: 1

      Red Flayer is certainly correct when he says it is a free (as in beer) short-term loan. I pay every bill with my one credit card. automatically. In 2 years I have actively paid 24 bills - rent each month. At the end of the 20 days free loan, my bank pays the credit card back. automatically. plus miles and stuff that other people have been saying really do mean i make a killing off my credit card (just used close to 260,000 American Airlines miles last year = free first class tickets to wherever the hell me and my girlfriend want to go)

      For the credit-afraid people of the world, here is something else which might blow your mind - with good credit, you can borrow or transfer balances for _long term_ benefits:
      1 - I am out somewhat recently out of college. Twice now I have had a high limit one year 0% interest balance transfer credit card. Paid one off the last month possible, doing the same now in October with another large chunk of school loans. Overall interest savings = $1,200.
      2 - Have a credit card that has 3.9% interest for the LIFE of the balance transfer. I defy you to find better loan rate from a bank.

      I have a decent amount of school debt because I come from a poor family, but having good credit has saved me a provable $1,200 in cash, and a free 1 week vacation (which would have cost around $2,000).

    92. Re:It's Your Choice by evilviper · · Score: 1

      b) if you're robbed, as long as you conscientiously inform the card company, you are not liable for anything charged on it - you're out nothing.

      If someone is able to charge the card before you have a chance to report it, you are liable for $50.

      [...] debit cards don't have the same form of protection.

      Completely wrong. Credit card liability terms are only slightly better than with debit cards.

      If you report the fraud within two days of noticing your debit card is missing or being abused, you can only be charged $50. If you wait longer, then you may owe a maximum of $500. And only if you wait a ridiculously long 60 days after a fradulent charge appears on your bank statement, do you lose all protection.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    93. Re:It's Your Choice by dlanod · · Score: 1

      My father had exactly the same problem. He ended up having to get a personal loan and pay it back just so he could be approved for their mortgage. I'm going through the same system at the moment, getting a loan to pay for a car I could have bought outright, just so when I do go for a mortgage I will have the credit history.

    94. Re:It's Your Choice by evilviper · · Score: 1

      There are many no-annual-fee cards out there that charge no interest if you pay it off every month.

      And as soon as a single check for one of your credit cards (or other loans) gets lost in the mail, or arrives a day late, all your cards will instantly go up to 40% interest. Good luck paying off the balance.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    95. Re:It's Your Choice by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, I don't want it. Credit is really just newspeak for "debt". The only debt I ever want to have, and I don't really want it very much, is a mortgage. Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card. Aside from anything else, my debit card doesn't pretend to be giving me something.

      Credit isn't newspeak for debt. If you don't carry a balance, you end up ahead of someone who only uses cash / debit.

      The beauty of credit cards is that, because of the way they work, if you pay them off every month, you actually pay less money then if you pay cash / debit. Why is this? Let's say you spend $1000 a month on a credit card, and you pay it off at the end of the month. This allows you to hold $1000 in a high-interest savings account like ING. Over the course of the year, because you're able to keep $1000 more in savings, you'll get some money in interest. For example, a 5% interest rate could give you about $50!

      Another way to put it: When you buy a $2000 computer on a credit card, that $2000 isn't due until the next billing cycle, about 30-60 days after your purchase. This means that your $2000 can sit in a bank, making you money. As a result, your $2000 computer really cost about $1999.

      Some people that I know will get cards with 0% interest introductory offers. Every month, they make the minimum payment and put the difference into a high-interest savings account or a CD. This allows them to make quite a bit of money on interest.

      So really, credit cards ARE worth it, because you can use them to get interest on money that you normally would spend.

    96. Re:It's Your Choice by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      store managers at large chain stores negotiate lower prices for big ticket items ALL THE TIME

      it's simply good business. if you have a $5000 item which you make $750 in profit on when sold, you still make a profit of $250 if you knock half a grand off in negotiation with a potential customer. the only time that is unwise for the store is if the item is hot enough you can be sure it will sell at full sticker price before you would have a chance to replace it.

      and if your business is carrying items with a $750 markup which are hot enough to be unable to reorder in time.... well i want to get into that line of work.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    97. Re:It's Your Choice by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      i do believe that legally credit cards are better protected than debit cards, however the cardholder agreements even things out to better than either is protected legally due to competition among card issuers. namely NOBODY can afford to be the card that will screw you if your debit card gets stolen.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    98. Re:It's Your Choice by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      utility bills aren't "credit" they are a bill for services rendered. just because the bill comes after the service does not make it credit any more than paying the bill at a restaraunt is credit. same with rent and oither such things. though i don't think it's common for landlords to even be reporting agents so not paying on time will likely not hurt your credit rating, just get your ass evicted.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    99. Re:It's Your Choice by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the credit card company gets plenty in merchant fees from your teransactions. they don't mind what you are doing one bit.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    100. Re:It's Your Choice by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Credit cards are useful occassionally - my fiancee and I use hers maybe three times a year - but I'd much rather use my debit card.

      I'm not sure I get this attitude. I use my Discover card to pay for everything (where possible). My cashback bonus is up to ~$310 right now (granted, it's been a year or so to gain that amount). If I used my debit card or check (*cringe*), that cashback bonus would be zero. I pay my credit card off every two weeks. Why not use it as a debit card and get the bonus cash/miles??

    101. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      So you're assuming that these market conditions are going to persist when you decide to buy a house?

      No, actually I'm hoping/expecting that the market is going to crash soon. Then I'll buy a house.

      Furthermore, a non-existent credit history is going to impact the interest rate you receive on your mortgage.

      Not in Britain it won't. If it did I would have a very good chance of suing the bank that tried it, although in reality I'd just go to one of the 100 or so other mortgage lenders.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    102. Re:It's Your Choice by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that in Britain, your credit score won't impact the interest rate you receive? I did not know that. Can you point to a law or ruling that guarantees this?

    103. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      So you're saying that in Britain, your credit score won't impact the interest rate you receive? I did not know that. Can you point to a law or ruling that guarantees this?

      It might impact your chance of getting a mortgage if it's really, really bad. But house prices where I live have doubled in 5 years so the banks are happy to lend to anyone buying a house - 100% interest-only mortgages given to 19-21 year olds with no or poor credit history are not uncommon as a result. The lenders have nothing to lose in the current market. Once the crash comes they will simply not lend so much to so many.

      Interest rates are posted in detail in every bank and building society branch and make no mention of variance due to credit rating, only the possibility of refusal. As such, trying to vary would run into misleading-advertising legislation if nothing else. I'm 42 and I've never heard of anyone ever being offered a different rate because of their credit rating, although my parents were once turned down because they were self-employed (that's going back 35 years, however).

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    104. Re:It's Your Choice by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      Well then, ignore everything I said.

      In the U.S., a lack of credit history will have a significant impact on the interest rate you are offered on a loan. Now certainly on something like an auto loan, your credit score impacts the interest rate you're offered there, doesn't it?

    105. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      Now certainly on something like an auto loan, your credit score impacts the interest rate you're offered there, doesn't it?

      I just talked to a friend of mine who's in charge of risk management in one of the larger banks here. He says that varying interest by credit rating is something they only do for businesses and the same applies to most lenders, including car loans. You either get the money at the standard rate or you're turned down; there's nothing in between.

      So now you know!

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    106. Re:It's Your Choice by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the education!

      To say the least, things are different here in the states. A poor credit score or a limited credit history can lead to receiving the loan or mortgage but at a higher interest rate than one who has an excellent credit score.

    107. Re:It's Your Choice by apparently · · Score: 1

      I wasn't saying that all debt is caused by immaturity. I was specifically responding to the comment Credit is newspeak for "debt", in which no, I don't believe using credit is going to necessarily mean you're going to go into debt.

    108. Re:It's Your Choice by Harik · · Score: 1

      In other words - it's nearly identical to the situation in the US.

      Some branches offer great low mortgage rates - but you have to have great credit score to get it.
      Some branches offer horrible non-fixed APR interest-only mortgages - but anyone can get them.

      See how your credit rating DOES impact what kind of rate you get?

    109. Re:It's Your Choice by nagora · · Score: 1
      Some branches offer great low mortgage rates - but you have to have great credit score to get it.

      No: you have to not have a terrible credit rating and all branches offer the same range of rates.

      Some branches offer horrible non-fixed APR interest-only mortgages - but anyone can get them.

      Again, such mortgages are available at every branch of every lender as long as you're not basically blacklisted as the most extreme credit risk. I know it sounds unlikely but the current housing boom is distorting things. But even in more normal times the only thing that would change is that your credit rating would not have to be quite so bad to be refused, but you still won't be offered a different rate.

      See how your credit rating DOES impact what kind of rate you get?

      No.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  9. Here you go... by HaeMaker · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Here you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And knowing is half the battle...

      Yoooooo JOE!

    2. Re:Here you go... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      From the link:

      There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private (emphasis mine) business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise.

      Does this mean that UIC, which is presumably publicly funded, may be in the wrong??

  10. world's smallest violin.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, get over yourself, open a bank account. Where do you keep your money? Do you even have any significant amount of money? How do you beat inflation? How do you pay taxes?

    What is it exactly you don't trust about banks? I mean, money is a number, and if it goes up in one place it has to go down someplace else, just check your bank statement each month, what exactly is going to happen?

    As for your dilemma, have your mommy write the check, or buy a fucking money order. They don't have to accept cash.

    1. Re:world's smallest violin.... by megaditto · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, it's not Christian to keep an interest-bearing bank account of any kind. Same might apply to Islam (though I am not too sure).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:world's smallest violin.... by dhasenan · · Score: 1

      Despite the parable about the servants who were given money while their master was away?

      One doubled the money.
      One made back half again as much.
      The third dug a pit and buried the money out of fear of losing it.

      The master returned and berated the third servant, saying he should at least have invested it with the money lenders so he could get some interest.

      So, where in the Bible are you getting this? (Not that I'm Christian; I'm just curious as to the source of the contradiction.)

    3. Re:world's smallest violin.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the parable you remember, the nobleman is in fact the bad guy!

      But back to your question, here:
      Psalms 15:5
      He that putteth not out his money to usury, nor taketh reward against the innocent. He that doeth these shall never be moved.

      Exodus 22:25
      If thou lend money to my people poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.

      And many other places, search for 'bible + usury'

    4. Re:world's smallest violin.... by dhasenan · · Score: 2

      I don't have the exact reference, but this was definitely New Testament, from the mouth of Christ (according to the scribe, at least).

      Also, 'usury' refers to charging unreasonably high interest rates, not just charging interest.

    5. Re:world's smallest violin.... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Christianity has proscriptions against usury, but no problem with investing and trade; see the parable of the master and three servants.

      Islam has some requirements, but there are Sharia-compatible banks and mortgages and what not. They're actually getting pretty popular amoung non-Moslems in North America as well.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:world's smallest violin.... by Jonathan_S · · Score: 1

      don't have the exact reference, but this was definitely New Testament, from the mouth of Christ (according to the scribe, at least).

      Also, 'usury' refers to charging unreasonably high interest rates, not just charging interest.
      Quick google search shows that you were thinking of 'The Parable of the Talents' which wikipedia tells me is Matthew 25:14-30.
    7. Re:world's smallest violin.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Who gives a fuck? the Bible also says we should stone children. and if a woman puts a bad thought in your head, stone her to death as well!
      Isn't the bible fun?

      Christ was no different then the many, many other 'prophets' at that time spouting the same crap at the time. He just managed to get killed by someone more important then the rest.

      Well, god wants me to kill my brother, got to go.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Jesus Christ by suv4x4 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jesus, you're stubborn:

    I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash. [..] I fear out of technicality I am going to loose my housing since I cannot get them their money on time because they do not take cash.

    Do you know few of the things you CAN do with cash?

    Get a cashiers check.

    Open a checking account.

    Just go and do it, don't just put your entire savings in there if you're so paranoid, put the amount that the university will charge you.

    Do you honestly are telling us that you'd rather *lose* your housing than open a checking account and put $100 in it?

    1. Re:Jesus Christ by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do you honestly are telling us that you'd rather *lose* your housing than open a checking account and put $100 in it? Don't be stupid, RMS would never submit an Ask Slashdot.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. I'd like to know just what the problem with banks is - do they make a habit of running off with people's money is the US?
      Personally I can't remember the last time I touched a bank note - I do everything on credit or debit cards (or online, natch). I have a small pot of change for carparks etc. but that's about it.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    3. Re:Jesus Christ by Ponzicar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that I've heard of. Plus we have this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fdic so bank failures aren't a big worry. I guess he could be worried about banks allowing fraud or hidden fees that they use to squeeze extra pennies out of people, but that can be minimized by only putting small amounts into the bank and using the account only when necessary.

    4. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Over in the UK most personal banking is free unless you go overdrawn and even then the banks have been hauled over the coals for charging too much for that so a small industry has sprung up with firms offering to help you reclaim excessive overdraft fees back.
      Personal accounts provide the volumes of people to keep the branch networks and thus the 'front door' open, small-medium companies pay for the clearing system and much of the income. Really big firms pretty muh get everything at cost or less as their volumes allow for reduced per unit cost. You also get odd situations like bank's paying customers like supermarkets to take the coin off them. The bank's can't count coin as an assett when calculating liquidity so they want to turn it in to notes and the supermarkets want coin.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    5. Re:Jesus Christ by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Personally I can't remember the last time I touched a bank note - I do everything on credit or debit cards (or online, natch). I have a small pot of change for carparks etc. but that's about it. Are you entirely serious? Where do you live? I believe that the U.S. still has dollar bills in wide circulation, and by today's standards that's a small amount you're likely to get in your change. Assuming you use the change to pay for (e.g.) cans of Coke and the like. If not... Don't some shops refuse or surcharge credit cards for small amounts?
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Jesus Christ by senatorpjt · · Score: 1

      do they make a habit of running off with people's money is the US? Pretty much. They don't "steal" the money, they just charge a lot of fees.
    7. Re:Jesus Christ by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Maybe he cannot open a bank account legally (e.g. 'illegal' immigrant without a SS# and a valid photo ID)?

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    8. Re:Jesus Christ by jeffasselin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Credit cards? I don't have or need one. I essentially never carry more than 20$CDN in my pockets, which I keep for small purchases, taxi runs, etc; and use my debit card for everything. But then I live in Canada. We don't really use checks anymore either.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    9. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is "illegal" in quotes?

    10. Re:Jesus Christ by mgblst · · Score: 1

      I hate people like you, always slowing everything down while the cashier checks back to base for your card. To hard to carry around a few dollars or pounds for even small item. Waiting til you get to the front of the line to get your card out. Wasting my time when you realise you handed over the wrong card, and you have another one somewhere. All I want to do is get the hell out of the place, and you are in my way! You people really suck.

      Can you really say that you have no problem with EVERYBODY knowing what you buy, where you have been. Even if you don't do anything wrong, that still annoys me.

    11. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Jesus Christ by thesandtiger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On top of that, the question itself is fucking stupid.

      "Dear Slashdot - I'm having trouble opening a jar of pickles. WHAT DO I DO?!"

      "Dear Slashdot - my mom won't let me have boys over unless we stay in the living room. Any advice?"

      I mean, the guy is in college and rather than solve a trivial problem on his own, he needs to ask the fucking Internet?!

      Here's my helpful suggestion to the person asking the original question: Just give up. Seriously. If you can't figure out how to do something simple like this on your own, the rest of life is going to steamroll you.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    13. Re:Jesus Christ by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. They don't "steal" the money, they just charge a lot of fees.

      That's odd. I don't get charged any fees, and I even make money by leaving my money sitting in the bank...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    14. Re:Jesus Christ by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2

      If there was ever a post that needed to be modded up, this is it.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    15. Re:Jesus Christ by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      We don't really use checks anymore either.

      Really? That's cool. Do people still refer to their income as a "paycheck"? Or government entitlementment payments as "checks"?

      If not, I'm packing my bags tonight. Because that means our neighbors to the north have moved past the 50's.

    16. Re:Jesus Christ by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      IME, it's possible to avoid bank fees, but it's also easy, especially for poor people, to get socked by them. My main bank charges if I go below a minimum balance, or if I make too many withdrawals on my savings account in a 3 month period. I haven't gotten either of those fees in years, but I used to get them when my finances were in the toilet.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Jesus Christ by Telvin_3d · · Score: 1

      It's all done direct deposit. Tax returns, pay checks, just about everything. I think the last time I handled a check was when my last landlord gave me back my damage deposit. As a Canadian, I think the only time I use cash money is hitting the bars and clubs, which are still very much a cash economy. Hell, half the pizza delivery and taxicabs have debit now.

    18. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Credit cards? I don't have or need one."
      Do you have a mortgage?
    19. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Where do you live?
      UK >Don't some shops refuse or surcharge credit cards for small amounts?
      Credit cards normally have a minumum like GBP5 or GBP10 but *debit* cards that take the money out your current (checking) account are usually fine although I'd probably balk at making a purchase for less that GBP2 or so. I don't tend to buy stuff like cans of coke when I'm out, newspapers in London are free (well, 3 are anyway) so apart from carparks, I really don't use cash much that I can recall.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    20. Re:Jesus Christ by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Oh, I understand. Even America isn't backward enough not to have direct deposit for wages and gov. benefits, and electronic payment for taxes.

      My point was that it annoys me how some people still describe these transactions like they involve checks. I know, it's probably just me, but it just feels so quaint to hear someone use "check" as a sort of metonym for "payment". I'm still trying to figure out what about it bothers me so much. I think it has to do with the level of presumption/specificity.

    21. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >always slowing everything down while the cashier checks back to base for your card
      You must have some antique infrastructure. Cashier taps up your purchases, you insert the debit card in the reader on the counter, it prompts for a PIN number after maybe 2 seconds and says 'remove card' after another second or two. Total payment time 4 seconds. People (especially women, sorry but please, get your cash ready in advance ladies) spend more time rummaging in their wallet or pocket for change.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    22. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep up the good job, CITIZEN!

      Continue to spread the word about our monetary infrastructure. You should be receiving a formal letter in the mail for your continued loyalty to the party.

      /end sarcasm

    23. Re:Jesus Christ by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Indeed. I'd like to know just what the problem with banks is - do they make a habit of running off with people's money is the US?
      Personally I can't remember the last time I touched a bank note - I do everything on credit or debit cards (or online, natch). I have a small pot of change for carparks etc. but that's about it.
      It's all in the fees. A lot of accounts require that you keep a minimum balance ($300, $500, $1000 is typical) and if you cannot maintain that balance, then you get charged a fee to keep the account open ($5 is typical). Now, Federal Savings Banks are required by law to charge you a fee if you perform more than 6 account transactions; Credit Unions can avoid this. These fees are all required to be published, but they do not necessarily bring them to your attention; so just ask to see the "Fee Service Schedule" (aka "Fees Schedule") to see what they are.

      Now a lot of banks offer different levels of service - e.g. basic, preferred, vip - and at the lowest level you get charged all the fees, and each level up you get some fees waived, or a certain number of them. What service level you are at usually depends upon (a) your balance with the bank, and (b) your standing with them - which directly translates to credit score material, though not necessarily counted towards your credit score.

      Yeah, it sucks. And worse yet - it's all backed by Congress.

      Also, he may not have enough cash at any given time to keep an account open. May be after his paycheck and expenses he only has $50 dollars left over, so he pocket it for some time, and then it all goes away at some point (e.g. the big day for paying the college bills). A scenario that may not be as uncommon as you may think among the poorer in the US.
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    24. Re:Jesus Christ by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the person you're replying to, but the same is (almost) true for me as well. I live in Northern Virginia, and before that in Central NY state. The only thing i've used cash for in the last 6 or 7 years is laundry money and highway tolls.

      Food, gas, subway/bus fare, shopping (even just a few dollar's worth to grab breakfast in the morning), doctor bills, vet bills, etc.....All paid for using a check card that's treated as a credit card. Rent still has to be paid for with a check, I don't think they even accept cash though.

      Are you entirely serious? Where do you live? I believe that the U.S. still has dollar bills in wide circulation, and by today's standards that's a small amount you're likely to get in your change.

      You don't necessarily have to deal with random change - just go to the bank every few weeks, use the ATM outside their front door to withdraw $20 or whatever, walk inside and ask for a couple neatly rolled stacks of nice shiny quarters. Generally highway tolls will be in multiples of 25 cents, so no change there, and likewise with laundry machines.

    25. Re:Jesus Christ by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      I hate people like you, always slowing everything down while the cashier checks back to base for your card. To hard to carry around a few dollars or pounds for even small item.

      I hate people like you, thinking they have to use cash for everything, slowing down the checkout line while you wait for everything to be tallied, you dig the change out of your pocket, the cashier counts everything, opens the drawer, gives you change, waits for you to put the change back in your wallet....

      Meanwhile I've swiped my card while the cashier was still scanning my items, and the receipt is printing by the time they're done putting stuff in a bag. For small amounts ($25 or less, I think), I don't even have to sign the slip most times anymore.

      Can you really say that you have no problem with EVERYBODY knowing what you buy, where you have been. Even if you don't do anything wrong, that still annoys me.

      No, I don't. If some corporate busybody really gives that much of a damn about the minutiae of my shopping, they're welcome to obsess over it. If the government wants to do it...well, they'll probably manage whether I use a credit card or not. Sorry that annoys you.

    26. Re:Jesus Christ by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Do you know few of the things you CAN do with cash?
      Get a cashiers check.
      Open a checking account.
      Pay for groceries, gas, newspaper, bills, etc.
      Pay for hotel, rent, deposits, jewelry, weaponry, etc.

      You can do pretty much anything in the "real" world with cash. You should try it sometimes.

      Note: I said "real" world. It would be hard to use cash to operate in the on-line world; not necessarily impossible, but hard. One could buy something off eBay with cash (just mail them the cash) - not necessarily the wisest thing to do, but possible.

      Reality is, that the world does use cash. Go to another country - especially second & third "world" countries - and you can use cash even easier, or in some cases are even forced to.

      Also, it's usually good to have some cash about. Power outages and the likes don't do too well for using credit cards, debit cards, etc. (Checks ok, but nothing electronic.) And yes - I have seen that even while traveling. (Stopped to get gas, and they didn't have power at the time, so the credit card system was out. They did, fortunately, have a manual, non-electronic credit card entry system that they could use though. Cash would have been better AND easier, but I didn't have any on that trip.)
      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    27. Re:Jesus Christ by SlackBastardNetworks · · Score: 1

      I once had a bank (BB&T) charge overdraft fees on an account because, as they said, "We thought you *might* overdraw your account." Please note that after all outstanding charges and fees had cleared, I still had a positive balance. It was just significantly lower than it should have been, but did not drop below a magic 'minimum balance' ceiling. The same bank also started charging overdraft fees on Direct Deposits made to my account.

      So, to answer one poster, yes, banks in the US do regularly make off with peoples' money. They do it through computer error, stubbornness and/or an inability of their employees to understand the seriousness of said errors (one such bank employee called me at work to scream, yes scream, at me and tell me the overdraft charges were the direct result of my inability to understand basic math - she no longer works at that bank).

      I did, however, get my money back. I sent a letter to the bank explaining to them the nature of their error, showing them the balance sheets in full, and demanding the immediate return of my funds by a specific (and short) deadline. I threatened to get several federal agencies and state attorneys general involved if my demands were not met. Not only did I receive my money a day before the deadline, but they sent me several free gifts as an apology.

      They made a similar mistake months later, long after the account had been closed. They deposited $100 in the account, reopening it in my name w/o my permission, in order to charge me a $5 inactivity service fee. I went to a local branch, demanded the sum in my account, and showed them the letters stating that the bank had closed my account months prior as per my request. I told them the money was in my name and I would be taking it now. Any attempt to stop me or recover the funds they had illegally opened my account with would result in the involvement of several federal agencies which govern who can, or cannot, open a bank account in someone else's name.

      They quite happily handed me the $95 and very quickly shut up about it.

    28. Re:Jesus Christ by Kelson · · Score: 1

      Don't some shops refuse or surcharge credit cards for small amounts?

      Yes. The minimum is usually posted on the counter, next to the logos showing which cards they accept. Typically it'll be in the $3-5 range. Mainly they don't want the processing fees charged by the credit card company to eat up the entire profit on the sale.

      Personally, I try to use cash for anything less than $10, and I'll use a debit or credit card for anything more than $20 (which I pay off each month unless I've made some particularly large purchase). In the $10-20 range, it depends on how much I have in my wallet and what else I'm planning on buying that day.

    29. Re:Jesus Christ by allforcarrie · · Score: 1

      thats not true either Bank of America will give illegals accounts. As long as you have Money or cna get Money Bank of America is your friend.

    30. Re:Jesus Christ by CrayDrygu · · Score: 1

      My point was that it annoys me how some people still describe these transactions like they involve checks. Really? When you want to call someone, do you dial the phone?
      --

      --
      "I personal[ly] think Unix is "superior" because on LSD it tastes like Blue." -- jbarnett

    31. Re:Jesus Christ by Khaed · · Score: 1

      Then he'd have a hell of a time getting admitted to a college.

    32. Re:Jesus Christ by Khaed · · Score: 1

      I hate people like you, always slowing everything down while the cashier checks back to base for your card.

      I hate waiting on someone to fish out the 77 cents instead of just breaking a fucking dollar bill. I swipe my card, enter my PIN, and I'm out. No change, no waiting for it to be counted. Also:

      To hard to carry

      Too* hard to carry.

      Waiting til you get to the front of the line to get your card out.

      Do you walk around with your cash out? No? Then don't bitch about this.

      Wasting my time when you realise you handed over the wrong card, and you have another one somewhere.

      As opposed to wasting my time when you can't find the twenty that you just know is in your pockets/purse?

      Can you really say that you have no problem with EVERYBODY knowing what you buy, where you have been.

      Well, if anyone wanted to know what I was buying at the grocery store or renting at Blockbuster, they could just stand in line behind me and peer at the items in question. Unless you stuff cash in your CD drive trying to buy things online and they're delivered from anonymous addresses in unlabeled brown boxes... then people know what you're buying online, which is where most people would buy things they didn't want to be seen buying.

      And, oh my God, the cashier knows what you bought, too!

      Unless you get checked out by a blind woman and have them surround you with a privacy curtain while you shop, people are going to know what you buy.

      Interestingly, I notice you use the non-United-States version of "realise" (Americans use a Z, "realize") -- are you perhaps located in the UK? You're complaining about people knowing where you've been. If you *are* from the UK, this is kind of a ridiculous thing to chalk up to using a debit card: How many cameras are there in the metropolitan areas of England?

    33. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still trying to figure out what about it bothers me so much.

      I think it has something to do with you being a fucking tool.

    34. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not actually need any documents to be admitted to college save for your hight school record and your medical history (or get re-vaccinated).

      To get any kind of scholarship/loan you do need to be documented, but if you are able to pay the full tuition (as little as a few hundred dollars in some cases), all they need is your signature.

    35. Re:Jesus Christ by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      Personally I can't remember the last time I touched a bank note - I do everything on credit or debit cards Have children. Between allowances and the money-raising fairs that the school holds regularly, you'll be handling plenty of bank notes. I really wish they would come up with a system to make credit cards easier for both preteen children and very small vendors.
      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    36. Re:Jesus Christ by Bent+Mind · · Score: 1

      Power outages and the likes don't do too well for using credit cards, debit cards, etc. (Checks ok, but nothing electronic.) And yes - I have seen that even while traveling. (Stopped to get gas, and they didn't have power at the time, so the credit card system was out. They did, fortunately, have a manual, non-electronic credit card entry system that they could use though. Wow, you must have really been out in the boondocks. I can't remember the last time I seen a manual credit card machine. I do remember having access to one when I was a kid, working the summer in a convenience store. However, it was never used.

      Of course, a manual credit card machine is useless if the cash register is electronic and the power goes out. Granted, the early electronic registers could be bypassed during power outages. The receipts could just be entered when power came back. However, most stores have modernized on registrars that are linked to inventory control and accounting systems. When the power goes out, the store is closed. No purchase possible.
      --
      Request a Linux Shockwave player here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/
    37. Re:Jesus Christ by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      While I do agree the question is dumb, I refuse to believe you never asked/researched what others might consider dumb questions. I do however think this question really does not belong on slashdot.

    38. Re:Jesus Christ by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      One could buy something off eBay with cash (just mail them the cash) - not necessarily the wisest thing to do, but possible.
      I've done it before in a pinch. I'm in the uk, the seller was in germany. I discovered after winning the auction (yes I know i should have read more carefully) that they didn't take paypal and the price of making a bank transfer was more than i was prepared to pay for such a small transaction (iirc it was a flat fee of over £10 for all transactions up to several thousand) .

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    39. Re:Jesus Christ by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I never said I've never asked a stupid question. However, I will say that I've always made every effort to find the answer on my own first unless it was incredibly convenient - like, I had a question and a person who'd know the answer was literally standing next to me.

      This? This is a dumb question and it's a shallow question, and it's a question that has answers that should be obvious to anyone at that level in life.

      A good question would have been: "Oh, hey, here's a problem I ran into at school - how do other people handle wanting to be cash only when the world is increasingly focused on credit and bank accounts?" That could have lead to an interesting discussion on privacy, anonymity, etc. Stuff that would be good fodder here.

      But he didn't ask that question. His question was, "I'm a college student who is too stupid to figure out that I can get a money order or cashier's check to pay for something where they refuse to take cash. Rather than try any of the solutions that should be obvious to someone who is a college student - such as the aforementioned money order/cashier's check or getting in touch with a supervisor or seeing if I could give someone else the money and have them pay it, I choose instead to ask people on the Internet. What should I do?"

      If someone is really that helpless and a college student, then they have issues far surpassing a distrust of banks, and I stand by my statement that they will be steamrolled by life.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    40. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Have children.
      Already have. The money gets transferred in to their bank account and they can do what they want with it after that - no cash changes hands with me.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    41. Re:Jesus Christ by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >money-raising fairs
      Missed that - our schools don't tend to have anything like that. The closest we get is 'bring a pound' day for various charities but that usually gets covered by the coin pot.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    42. Re:Jesus Christ by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      "Of course, a manual credit card machine is useless if the cash register is electronic and the power goes out. "

      Must be a youngin'?

      Ever heard of a manually written receipt? Sure, you may have to go back and re-enter everything into your fancy systems (if you have them), but no need to close the store. Amazing how some people/businesses get so tied to their electronic systems they can even function if the system(s) go offline.

      "ook, ook, my computerized spear guidance system is offline!"
      "ook, ook, well, call it a day, we'll get the deer tomorrow after Bob fixes it"

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    43. Re:Jesus Christ by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I used to use my debit card, but then it ran dry and I bought gum, a burger, paper, and some other small item for around 5 bucks. The overdraft charge? Around 50 bucks EACH for about 200 dollars total. Each purchase is hit with a big fee regardless of the size of the purchase.

      Why the charge? Why not just invalidate the purchase and let me know that the card is dry and I should be paying some other way? Because they don't get the fee that way. That enormous charge is for providing credit on the debit card automatically(i.e unasked for). Paying for what you can't afford and incurring huge fees as a result? That's the reason you're supposed to fear credit cards, it's just as true on your debit card.

      Pretty bullshit stuff. I only pay with credit now, and just pay in full at the end of the month.

    44. Re:Jesus Christ by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      I'm at the point where I actually get pissed when I see somebody writing a check these days. Especially when they're standing there with their checkbook open and I can SEE their debit card in their wallet. In fact, lately I've been noticing more and more places that won't even take checks. The local McDonald's is one. The Hooters I went to last night was another. Hell, the only thing I pay by check every month is my parking spot becuase the guy doesn't offer another form of payment. And I have a tendency to forget about him becuase of this fact, too.

      I see no reason to ever need to write a check aside from monthly bills. I've got 4 different bank accounts at 4 different banks and everyone of them issue debit cards as standard. Are there actually banks out there who don't issue debit cards?

      The same thing goes with cash. About the only things I ever use cash for are soda vending machines and strippers. And I think it's only a matter of time before the former start offering debit card payments.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    45. Re:Jesus Christ by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      Considering that banks in Canada are opened from 11:01 to 11:03 (slight exaggeration), they obviously automatically deliver debit cards, and few other than old and unemployed people go to a human teller anymore.

      And you've never seen a vending machine that accepts a debit/credit card? They're not very common, but I've seen some.

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    46. Re:Jesus Christ by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      While asking questions is the lazy route, there's nothing wrong with it. After all who said you have to answer?

      Not knowing about money orders or cashier's checks is ignorant, not stupid unless you think knowing about them requires some mental exercise. His question was basically what do I do if a place doesn't accept cash, vitually the same as your own reworded question. I see nothing in either there that would inspire discussions on privacy, anonymity, etc, unless simply mentioning banks and credit cards invoke some primal urge to talk about the three (heck it might this is /.).

      Like I said his question shows how (disturbingly) ignorant and/or sheltered the person is/was to the outside world, but the whole give up you're too dumb was uncalled for, especailly since it'll take 5min of reading slashdot, or other sites to figure out what to do in his life in terms of cash. A give up you're too lazy might apply though.

    47. Re:Jesus Christ by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Well, I've seen a few on college campuses that will accept student IDs and deduct from a student's cash spending account (Tulane and Vanderbilt are two with this type of vending machine), but never one that will accept a major credit/debit card.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

  12. Wha? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are you Dale Gribble? Just get a bank account.

  13. You can't get a money order? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

    I'm reasonably sure that in this day and age most reasonably sized towns would have a post office that you would be able to get a money order from. Further to that, I'm reasonably sure that it is quite a rare for a university campus not to have a post office.

    Get a money order and be done with it.

  14. Get a money order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't have to accept cash, no.

    And you shouldn't be paying cash for such a service anyway. Get a cashier's check or money order.

    You'll find as you become an adult very few (non-slumlord) landlords will even accept cash. It's too big a hassle, it's not safe to carry around, and most importantly it doesn't leave a paper trail. Yes, a paper trail is important, considering how often tenants and landlords end up in court! This is for your OWN protection anyway. If you insist on paying in cash your school may have a bookkeeping error and say the cash was never received (and thus you won't have a room waiting for you), or a future landlord may say you missed a rent payment several months back. Without proof of deposit you're going to have a hell of a time proving they're wrong.

    Just bite the damn bullet and get a checking account and debit card. Do it at a small credit union if you don't trust the "man". Personally I think you're being a fool... Your money is much safer in a bank, and If you're known for keeping large amounts of cash in a dorm room, it WILL be stolen.

  15. No one wants to deal in cash any more by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    Its too easily stolen and comes with higher staffing, maintenance and security costs. When I lived in Amsterdam a few years ago it had gotten to the point where several bank branches in the city did not even carry cash and for those that did only carried small amounts so you had to inform them in advance if you wanted to withdraw anything in excess of something like 5K.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:No one wants to deal in cash any more by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Really? In Germany it is the exact opposite, non-cash ways of paying for things are still, relatively speaking, rare. The big places will all take plastic, but many Germans still prefer to pay for whatever they can in cash. The Germans are the ones that insisted on making a 500 euro bill(though I have yet to see one personally, maybe because I'm so poor :P)

      When I lived in Japan it was pretty cash based too, though between when I lived there in 2003 and when I went there in 2006, the number of places that took plastic grew significantly.

    2. Re:No one wants to deal in cash any more by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

      It doesn't come with identity theft or credit card fraud though. Which I expect accounts for more theft now than was ever done with cash thefts.

    3. Re:No one wants to deal in cash any more by cyxxon · · Score: 1

      Hm, no, I am German as well, but that paints a wrong picture. Most banks in Germany require you to call in advance if you want to get more than say 5k or so, and there are indeed a lot of things you cannot do without an EC or CC card here. Have you tried to buy a flight recently, or booked a hotel room? CC. No option for paying with cash, since they cannot bill you additional charges then (destroyed furniture, cancellation fees if you do not show up, etc). Sure, you can buy groceries with cash, and clothes and the like, but that's about it in my experience.

    4. Re:No one wants to deal in cash any more by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It doesn't come with identity theft or credit card fraud though. Which I expect accounts for more theft now than was ever done with cash thefts.
      Ever? As in, for the whole of history? Do you have some figures to back that up - here perhaps http:www.yourass.com?
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    5. Re:No one wants to deal in cash any more by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Hallo, ich heisse UbuntuDupe, ich moechte gern ein Hotelzimmer mieten... Wie bitte? Ich muss eine Kreditkarte haben? Wieso? ... Weil ich das Zimmer verderben koennte? Unerhoert! ... Nehmen Sie vielleicht eine Kuh an? ... Ja, aber diese Kuh haben Sie noch nicht gesehen! ... Was ist's Ihnen, wenn ich das Zimmer verderbe, besitzen Sie eine tolle Kuh! ... Verstanden. Auf Widersehn. ... Mutti, ich bin's! Ja, darf ich mein altes Zimmer naechste Wochenende benutzen? ... Wem hast du es vermietet???

  16. I do the same thing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live off cash, for various reasons. There are a few options:

    1) Money Order. Goto western Union, and make one, easy. Cashier's checks, traveller's cheques, etc.
    2) Prepaid Visa Giftcard. Since its only $100 deposit, a simple $100 gift card will do. get the ones that are visa logo. Works every time. (Short of a few online orders that require address match.. in which case..
    3) Get something similar to Western Union Prepaid Mastercard. $5/month, $4/reload. Easy. Overall if you need a Logo card, its decent, easy to reload, and relatively cheap. Only problem is.. When you get out in the real world, PG&E has 'partnered' with Visa, so you have to pay in cash, as they refuse to accept mastercard/amex/etc. (jerks...)

    Just run down to your local walgreens (green, not mart mind you) pick up one of them $100 gift cards, they're yellow btw, and tada! problem solved.

    Also.. if you ever read a paper bill.. upper left hand corner..

    This Note is Legal Tender
    For all Debts, Public and Private.

    Dont know who you would call though...

  17. Trust by jfroot · · Score: 4, Funny

    So let me get this straight, you don't trust the banks so much that you make your life clearly more difficult, but you're willing to trust advice from a bunch of geeks on Slashdot? Maybe we're all out to get you too!

    1. Re:Trust by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      No 'maybe'. I only lurk on Slashdot because I am out to get you all.

  18. Quite simply... "No." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is not legal. It states explicitly on the bills: "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private." They're required by law to take it.

    1. Re:Quite simply... "No." by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      Wrong. If you had read other posts before making your post, or had checked through Google, you would have found out that isn't true, but, then again, with such a sharp, clever, and unique insight, I'm sure you're a lawyer and know what you're talking about, right?

    2. Re:Quite simply... "No." by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      So which part of "pre-payment" implies there is a Debt?

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  19. FFS by gellenburg · · Score: 1

    JFC dude.

    Ever hear of a Money Order?

  20. Staffing, Accounting Systems, Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Maybe too much cash would pile up and make it a robbery target.


    Maybe the staff are too dumb to accept cash. Or too crooked. Maybe it gets to be an accounting nightmare.


    Maybe they need the audit trail.


    They should suck it up and beef up their system to take be able to take cash. The fish is in the boat, why throw it back? Oh, we don't accept cash. Makes a business man cringe to hear that kind of talk.


    It is probable stupidity or budget contraints rather than some conspiracy.

  21. I don't trust them either... by feepness · · Score: 1

    I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash.

    I don't trust them either. So I check the balances online, keep the printed copies (and decline online-only records), and keep deposit receipts.

    Really, you're going to have to get one eventually, and if you are clever enough to work the system you can get all sort of cashback rewards and the like.

    It isn't that difficult, they make easy enough cash off the genuises who carry $10K balances they don't really need to screw you for your $100 deposit. And it also depends on the risk you want to take... if I lose my wallet I'm secure two phone calls later (I carry only my ATM card and one credit card). If you lose $20K on the way to buy a car what are your options?

  22. All your answers right here... by Enderandrew · · Score: 0

    Mail your cash to my home address.
    ????
    Profit, I mean, I will then help you with all your problems.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  23. So... you only have cash by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

    Where do you live?
    You'd be a lot easier to steal from than somebody that uses bank accounts.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  24. Cyberspace cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the famous "Cyberspace trilogy" books (yes that's where the word came from) it's illegal to conduct business using cash, coz it allows for too much fraud; everyone uses credit chips...

    1. Re:Cyberspace cash by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It's true. Large amounts of cash are suspicious. There's an entire money laundering business to turn large amounts of suspicious cash into large amounts of unsuspicious cash. If you can't prove you got your large amount of cash legally, it's suspicious.

      There are many holes in the way law enforcement tries to catch illegally acquired cash at the moment. If they try to close those holes, it's quite likely that using cash for large transactions will become illegal. Or even using cash at all; Dutch banks already want everybody to use a kind of credit chips.

    2. Re:Cyberspace cash by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

      Or even using cash at all; Dutch banks already want everybody to use a kind of credit chips.
      But not far away, in Germany there is a definite prejudice still in favour of cash. I have even heard of property transactions in cash there.
  25. Re:I will accept your cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a title like that I was *so* expecting a goatse link. You disappoint me.

  26. FDIC by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

    If you carry around a large amount of cash (say $100), and somebody mugs you for it, you're out $100. Same goes for the property management firm (in this case, the college): if they have $100 in their office and it gets stolen, along with somebody's lunch, they're out that $100. However, thanks to FDIC insurance, if somebody robs a bank of $100, the Federal Reserve is out $100, not the bank.

    Sure cash has no transaction fees like credit/debit transaction fees, and doesn't require verification like checks (or fees if you outsource that like a lot of larger retailers do), but businesses don't like to deal with cash as it's a bigger liability than any of the other aforementioned methods (due to potential robbery, fraud, lack of paper trail, etc.).

    I hate writing checks and I don't like to use my credit card for paying bills. I regularly pay via money order. They're not free, but the fee isn't usually all that much, typically a few dollars.

    You can get money orders from many convenience stores, grocery stores, and post offices. Most banks will also let you purchase them. Some banks will give them to you for free if you are a client. I usually end up with Western Union money orders from 7-eleven.

    The only institutions (if I understand correctly) that won't accept money orders is insurance companies. You'll probably be better off paying with a cashier's check instead (I can't recall the difference here).

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  27. I'd avoid cash as well by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean all a dollar is is a promise of payment from the US teasury - essentially a big bank. Do all your dealing in precious metals.

    1. Re:I'd avoid cash as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Precious metals? Not usually. I only barter in items that have intrinsic value.

      This reminds me, I too had trouble putting down a deposit for my college dorm room back in 1999. Would you believe that they wouldn't take beaver pelts? I even threw in some iron pots and a musket. They treated me like I was crazy! Does no one take beaver pelts as legal barter anymore!?

    2. Re:I'd avoid cash as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe... this got tagged funny when it's some honest advice... cash value gets inflated away every day... own PM's.

  28. Minor Nit by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Just to be clear, when you go to the post office, you are getting a Postal Money Order, not a cashier's check.

    That being said, your advice is indeed the most prudent course of action for the original poster.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  29. simple solution by fragnafritzz · · Score: 1

    don't have time to read the thread atm (!) but just go in and get a certified check.

  30. And cash can be counterfeited by ebbe11 · · Score: 1

    I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash. Man, you have no chances left.
    --

    My opinion? See above.
    1. Re:And cash can be counterfeited by ankleteeth · · Score: 1

      "Man, you have no chances left."

      You have no chance to survive, make your time!

  31. here's what you do: by Daltorak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You get over it. That's what you do. If you're too chickenshit to even open up a chequing or credit account that you wouldn't even use save for the occasional transaction that must be done using a verifiable electronic method, you are not going to make it very far in this world. You won't ever be able to get a place you can call your own; you will have difficulties getting some kinds of jobs if you don't have a demonstrable credit history; you won't be able to get a variety of services. Sure, you can go to the local Western Union and constantly have to make money orders for everything, but then you'd constantly have to carry hundreds if not thousands of dollars around with you (how safe is that?) and you have to pay out of your own pocket every time. Plus, to most people, you won't look like you've got your shit together if you're constantly paying for everything with money orders. People that you want most to trust you, won't.

    And how the heck do you plan on saving money? Put it in a shoebox under your bed? What if your place burns down in a fire, or what if someone breaks in and steals it? Insurance companies won't replace lost or stolen cash. If your credit card or bank card gets stolen and used for fraud, you almost certainly will get your money back -- that's the beauty of little electronic footprints and camera footage.

    1. Re:here's what you do: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. He won't have any of those problems. No one will be able to pay him...

  32. Two Points by Shihar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, the answer has already been posted. Get a money order.

    Two, you are an idiot if you pay cash to the university. You don't trust banks but you are willing to trust a university? Your trust issues are more then a little fucked up. If you pay cash to a university, you have one less piece of a paper trail should the university turn around and screw you... and screw you they often do. Universities are notorious for piss poor management, lost bills, and all other manner of headaches. Despite the general incompetence of most universities, the one thing you can always fall back on is that if they charge you electronically there is not only their receipt, but a transaction from your bank as well. When you go to dispute your bill, you will be armed with a very clear record of how they fucked up. Your trust priorities are a little confused if you think that a bank is more likely to screw you then a university.

    I highly suggest making friends with money orders, refillable credit cards, or some other method of paying besides cash. Only using cash will keep you from doing some very simple things, like ordering stuff online, sending checks in the mail, etc.

    I am not sure if you are paranoid, trying to dodge taxes, or just are not happy with the crop of crazy groups available at universities and decided to start your own but you are likely to find the all cash world not worth whatever you are getting. Sure, you might dodge a few taxes, but the amount you pay in pain and the inability to easily use basic services is likely to be far worse then Uncle Sam's FICA taxes. If you are just paranoid... well, I suggest seeing a doctor with the power to prescribe medication. Uncle Sam really doesn't give a shit that you had to pay a school deposit. Really.

    1. Re:Two Points by EtoilePB · · Score: 1

      If you pay cash to a university, you have one less piece of a paper trail should the university turn around and screw you... and screw you they often do. Universities are notorious for piss poor management, lost bills, and all other manner of headaches. Despite the general incompetence of most universities, the one thing you can always fall back on is that if they charge you electronically there is not only their receipt, but a transaction from your bank as well. When you go to dispute your bill, you will be armed with a very clear record of how they fucked up.

      This is exactly why I almost never use cash for anything if I can help it. If I had paid my movers $500 cash when they ended up stealing and breaking my stuff, I'd have been hosed; instead, I could call my credit card company and say, "I am disputing this," and I wasn't out $500 with no record and no recourse.

      Checking accounts and credit cards, when used responsibly, are in the consumer's best interest. You never lose the money without a paper trail. And yes, university bureaucracies are the second-worst, right behind health care. I have indeed had to fax copies of cancelled checks to hospitals and bring copies of cancelled checks to universities before to get them to stop hounding me about bills I already paid. Keeping proof of outgoing money is ALWAYS in your best interest.

    2. Re:Two Points by kabocox · · Score: 1

      your trust priorities are a little confused if you think that a bank is more likely to screw you then a university.

      Hey, give the guy a break, it's obvious he is a freshman, or he'd already know this.

      Banks are where my family has always keep our money. They are great for having a paper trail. Without that paper trail from a bank or credit card or some large entity, anyone can say you didn't pay it and try to make you pay it again and again. That doesn't really happen much with things like Walmart or McDonalds. But when you get into the real world, you don't want the electric company, your landlord, or other utilities or house or car payment to be double charging you for anything. Those bills are much larger.

      I'm sorry any thing that is a couple of hundred I'd want something more than a single reciept. I'm paranoid that way. Having a bank or credit card company behind you when you really need it can be a great plus. Be paranoid about actually having to pay interest for credit card purchases and their hidden pitfalls. If you know what they are good for, they make great tools.

  33. Good luck by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1

    It may not be legal for them to do that, but bureaucracy at UIC is a completely horrible mess of incompetent staff with no accountability. Good luck.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  34. Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get it. You don't trust banks, but you trust the Federal Reserve ? The people who can and do print money like it grows on trees and in cotton fields ?

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by thefirelane · · Score: 1

      Dear Ask Slashdot, I'm a university student, and my university didn't accept my gold bullion as pre-payment for a dorm room. What can I do?

    2. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Funny

      They didn't accept my cow either. And I don't like paying in cash and that's why I always carry a cow with me. What do I do?

    3. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by ji777 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They didn't accept my cow either. And I don't like paying in cash and that's why I always carry a cow with me. What do I do? Exchange the cow for some magic beans and try those.
    4. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. You don't trust banks, but you trust the Federal Reserve ? The people who can and do print money like it grows on trees and in cotton fields ?

      Shh, I prefer never to really think about what physical assest is behind our currency... because its just belief/faith that has been backing it for decades. This is an interesting subject to look into, but it's really scary if you actually "think about it."

    5. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Shh, I prefer never to really think about what physical assest is behind our currency... because its just belief/faith that has been backing it for decades. This is an interesting subject to look into, but it's really scary if you actually "think about it."

      It isn't, actually. The only thing that makes gold valuable (as a medium of exchange) is the belief/faith that it will remain valuable as a medium of exchange. Anything beyond a strict barter system of goods intended to be consumed for goods intended to be consumed depends on the belief/faith that the medium of exchange will still be valuable as a medium of exchange in the future.

      Consider gold, which many people consider the gold standard (ha ha...sorry, couldn't resist) of "real" currency. If we were to have a real, worldwide breakdown of civilization (Lucifer's Hammer style), what value would gold have? People need food, potable water, clothing, shelter, firearms, etc. Gold wouldn't be of any particular value; it really might as well be greenbacks at that point. Your carton of cigarettes would be worth more than its weight in gold.

      The only advantage gold has over fiat money is it has real, rather than artificial, scarcity. This protects gold against a government devaluing it, and has a very anti-inflationary effect. Which, on the whole, is an advantage for creditors and a disadvantage for debtors. The fact that it's protected from government meddling is a major advantage, true - but it has nothing to do with the fact that it's belief/faith that makes it valuable.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    6. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      Bravo, sir - both for the common sense against the "fiat money" tin-foil-hatters, but the Larry Niven reference. Where's my damned mod points when I need them?

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    7. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Your carton of cigarettes would be worth more than its weight in gold.

      Before anyone gets wise and thinks we should have a tobacco standard--think again. In Free to Choose, Milton Friedman writes about how one of the Southern states tried that in colonial times. It was a disaster because people started growing even more tobacco, and hyperinflation ensued. The same thing happened with silver when we discovered Nevada--we had a bimetallic standard then, where a dollar was equivalent to x ounces of gold and y ounces of silver. Long story made short, you could actually make money by depositing silver and withdrawing gold on the dollar, which was an absurd monetary policy.

      The only advantage gold has over fiat money is it has real, rather than artificial, scarcity. This protects gold against a government devaluing it, and has a very anti-inflationary effect.

      However, it does nothing to protect gold from being devalued from gold rushes, like tobacco and silver were. Of course, gold is not at all protected from deflation, in which it just gains value sitting there gaining zero (or even negative) interest. You might think that's a great thing, but inflation encourages people to spend and lend money. Spending encourages economic growth, of course, but so does lending--if you need a mortgage, or if you're a business needing to borrow money for expansion, having relatively cheap credit helps.

      Deflation is worse than inflation. That's why we have inflation--it would be best to have neither, but given the risks involved, it's better to err on the side of inflation. Of course, if you err too much, you have to continually reinvest your money and prices are more confusing, among other things, but at low inflation rates like we have now, it's manageable.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    8. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by Choc_Salties · · Score: 1

      Hey, here in Africa, you buy wives with cattle, otherwise known as lobolo. Doesnt work with universities here either...

    9. Re:Do you trust the Federal Reserve ? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      You get a cash cow. When they don't accept bovine payments you simply milk the cow.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  35. Open a bank account by mlk · · Score: 1

    And only put in it what you really need to.

    Or better yet, go see a counselor.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  36. Legal tender laws by tres3 · · Score: 1
    I'd love to see this challenged. Legal Tender laws were passed to force people to accept paper money instead of demanding gold or silver as payment. As in what is stated in the Constitution. Prior to the Federal Reserve paper money used to say "In Gold we Trust" and it used to be redeemable for gold. That changed with the Federal Reserve and it was forced down our throat with the legal tender laws that said we had to accept Federal Reserve Notes as payment for all debt, public and private, and that is what is printed on all paper notes. You should point that out to the housing department. A lawsuit is only $30 in most jurisdictions and you can sue for damages so sue for the $1.50 the money order costs plus the gas to drive there the time it takes and all the expenses associated with filing the lawsuit. It won't cost that much to push this issue and it should be an easy victory. I know many here said that if you already owe the money then the legal tender laws apply but if you have not yet incurred the debt then they don't. I can't help but thinking that someone would have still insisted upon gold being paid in advance of making any transaction in an attempt to avoid accepting the new notes of the private for profit corporation named "The Federal Reserve". (Yes it is private, it was incorporated in 1914 in Puerto Rico, no it is no more federal then Federal Express, and no it doesn't have any reserves.) I think you would have an easy win and perhaps a good story for the college newspaper.


    The Honorable Ron Paul tried to have the Legal Tender Laws repealed on July 25, 2003, when he spoke from The Well of The House of Representatives and stated:

    Legal tender laws disadvantage ordinary citizens by forcing them to use money that is vulnerable to vast depreciation. As Stephen T. Byington wrote in the September 1895 issue of the American Federationist: "No legal tender law is ever needed to make men take good money; its only use is to make them take bad money. Kick it out!" Similarly, the American Federation of Labor asked: If money is good and would be preferred by the people, then why are legal tender laws necessary? And, if money is not good and would not be preferred by the people, then why in a democracy should they be forced to use it?
    ...
    While harming ordinary citizens, legal tender laws help expand the scope of government beyond that to which it is authorized under the Constitution. However, the primary beneficiaries of legal tender laws are financial institutions, especially banks, which have been improperly granted the special privilege of creating fiat irredeemable electronic money out of thin air through a process commonly called "fractional reserve lending." According to the Federal Reserve, since 1950, these private companies (banks) have created almost $8 trillion out of nothing. This has been enormously advantageous to them.
    HR 2779 (source)
    Had his resolution passed then they would have legally been able to tell you what form of payment they would accept. This did not pass and they are required to take legal tender a/k/a cash as payment. This will be an easy case for you to win. Just like going into a drive through in the middle of the night and reading the sign no bills over $20 accepted and handing them a $50. This was the intention of these laws to prevent them from saying payment in gold or silver only. This is the main reason that I so strongly support Dr. Ron Paul for President.
    1. Re:Legal tender laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not have seen this response to the first post.

    2. Re:Legal tender laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My god... such a long, ill-informed ramble. As noted repeatedly in other responses, legal tender is only relevant for the settlement of an existing debt; neither the situation in the poster's question nor your hypothetical drive-through are examples of this.

      This is the main reason that I so strongly support Dr. Ron Paul for President. Such a pity.
    3. Re:Legal tender laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prior to the Federal Reserve paper money used to say "In Gold we Trust" and it used to be redeemable for gold.

      "In Gold we Trust"? Is this some kind of a joke?

      This is an example of how US paper currency used to look. What it actually says is something like: "This certifies that there have been deposited in the Treasury of the United States of America fifty dollars in gold coin payable to the bearer on demand". Nothing about "In Gold we Trust".

      On the other hand, coins did not say anything about redemptability, I suppose because they were themselves made from precious metals at that time. But they did generally include both the slogans "E pluribus unum" and "In God we trust" since the 1860s. An example is this 1881 dollar coin: (obverse) (reverse)

    4. Re:Legal tender laws by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Prior to the Federal Reserve paper money used to say "In Gold we Trust"


      OK, now you're just making shit up.
      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    5. Re:Legal tender laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way I see it, fiat currencies have no inherent value anyways. As much as I am also a "cash person" in the real world we live in today, ideally we should be working towards a common-sense valued currency like gold or silver coins, or at least paper money backs by gold or silver in cases where it would become too difficult to carry around a lot of precious metals. :-)

      Money orders are relatively easily and anonymously obtained from any number of outlets - walmart, most grocery stores, 7-11s, as well as any post office. This offers an alternative for those who want to use cash and not deal with banks, but require a "check".

    6. Re:Legal tender laws by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC the legal-tender laws had a very good purpose. When they were enacted, banks issued their own bank notes. All a bank note (which is what currency is) is is a paper issued by a bank promising to redeem it for a certain amount of "real" money on demand. With every bank issuing it's own, there's a problem. When I walk into a business and try to pay with bank notes issued by a bank several states away, how's the business to know that bank's still in business? How do they know it ever existed in the first place? Nobody would trust bank notes issued by banks that weren't local and known to them, and that's a big problem in interstate commerce. So the Federal government intervened by chartering a handful of banks and backing their notes with it's own guarantee that the government would redeem the notes if the banks couldn't or wouldn't. Now you didn't have to know or trust the issuing bank, as long as you trusted the government to keep it's promise (whether you do or not's another matter). To give this teeth, and make sure people weren't stuck with debts they couldn't pay because the creditor wouldn't accept any of the notes the debtor had, they added laws that said that offering to pay with government-guaranteed notes constituted, by law, a lawful tender of payment. A creditor was free to refuse to accept it, but as long as your offer was open they couldn't claim you hadn't paid. This covered the other half, making it so that people could use those government-guaranteed notes without having to worry about being stuck with a debt and the creditor wouldn't accept their form of payment.

      Those chartered banks eventually merged and morphed into the Federal Reserve Bank we know today. But when it started, legal-tender laws had a perfectly good reason for being.

  37. Very dumb way to live. by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You will need credit. Not just to buy and sell. To get an apartment. To get a job. To forge other relationships with various institutions that want to evaluate your trustworthiness with something other than your own claims about yourself.

    It's regrettable, maybe (certainly I think so), but it's also damn tough to live any other way in the end. A life without credit is a life with many fewer opportunities and many fewer potential relationships. Not just slightly fewer, but fewer to a crippling extent.

    But credit is not something that exists here, now, it is something that exists through your own financial history of using it. That is to say it's circular: you get a little, you use that little, then you get a little more, then you use that little more, etc. You only get Credit (big 'C') by using your credit (small 'c') responsibly over time. The later you start, the later you'll actually get there.

    If you're over 20 and you haven't started already, you're way behind the game. By the time you're 30 and haven't started, most institutions won't extend you any anymore. They'll just paint you as "different." They don't care whether you're different in a bad or good way for not having credit; they just don't want to do business with people who are "different." Because "different" people might respond to responsibilities in "different" ways from the ways in which members of society typically do.

    My advice: go open a bank account and put some money in it. Leave a balance of a few hundred dollars there for a few months, then get a credit card with that bank. Use the damn card. Pay off your balance. Even if you just do $20 a month, i.e. toilet paper and granola bars, on the card. Just to get a credit history going on.

    And later on, if you find yourself in this situation again, you'll have a bank account that you can quickly deposit some cash in and use a Visa/Mastercard debit card against.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Very dumb way to live. by schotty · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent. In fact, get a job working for a collection agency. You will learn exactly how credit works, how to break it, how to mend it, and how to grow it without that much effort.

      As the parent said, get a prepaid credit card. These work generally in $100 or $250 increments, and are issued at all major banks and credit unions. Get one for whatever your monthly bills are to accrue (minus rent, since you probably cannot pay with a Visa there). Gas, food, smokes, chips, phone bill. Run it up, at the end/middle/start of the month, pay it all off. Do this repeatedly throughout the term of the deposit. Then when you can get a real Visa/Mastercard, do the same.

      Another option is similar, but with a secured loan. You put whatever the amount of the loan is. lets say 12 month / $1000 loan. You drop the $1000 in, it is locked. You earn interest on it. In exchange, you get $1000 to do what you want. Use this to pay the monthly payment on that loan. You end up making $50 or so in interest over the next year, and build credit fast (or repair it).

      Also, you WILL WANT A BANK ACCOUNT! Either with a bank (if you travel alot this is most handy) or a credit union (better interest rates, and better loans, but usually only local). If your employer has a credit union, join it. You can usually, even with shit credit, get a loan after a few years (5 to 10) just because you were a reliable member for a while. Even if it is a $20 every pay period over the time in a savings (not checking, or money market) account.

      Again, take a 3-9 month gig at a collection agency. If you can deal with the phone, its a cakewalk for decent money. I worked one for 6 months and made a crapload off fees alone (fees are the fees tha collection agency charges the creditor for successfully working the debtor into paying a portion or full amount of the debt).

      Cashless is a fantasy these days.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    2. Re:Very dumb way to live. by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I've never had a credit check for a job, nor have I met anyone who has. I know that it has been done, but that's a pretty weak statement.

      The only real value of a credit history is as a means of incurring more debt. That may be a very useful thing to do, but really, that's all there is to it, and if you don't ever want to incur debt, as e.g. for a mortgage, there's no practical reason to want a credit history.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    3. Re:Very dumb way to live. by xsonofagunx · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but I have heard that paying off credit cards every month (and thus not accruing any finance charges) is viewed negatively by financial institutions, and may actually hurt your credit score instead of improving it. They aren't making any money off of you, so they won't raise your credit limit (and why would they need to, if you aren't making purchases that raise your balance close to the limit anyway). While no one wants to be paying huge interest fees, if what I've heard is correct, you may want to just pay the minimum payment once every few months, allowing the interest fees to be charged, and then pay things off. If I'm wrong, I'd love to hear it - but if what I've heard is correct, then I'd hate for someone to put a bunch of effort into raising their credit rating and limits by paying everything off every month, only to find out that it's no different than when they first got the credit line.

    4. Re:Very dumb way to live. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      I've religiously paid my credit card in full every month for 7-8 years. Not only do I have a decent credit rating but with a call to the credit card company I have on a number of occasions increased the limit on my credit card. It's someone uncomfortably high right now (I think it's something like $12000), and I may decrease it in the near future.

      Credit card companies make money because I am the exception to the rule. Most of the country (U.S.) lives with credit card debt (even if they have the means to pay it off).

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    5. Re:Very dumb way to live. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think this makes the most sense. I haven't heard of anyone so paranoid so as to go cash-only since I've heard stories about my Grandpa after the Great Depression.

    6. Re:Very dumb way to live. by sholden · · Score: 1

      Except of course if you ever happen to want to get into debt for some unforeseen reason (medical expenses, paying of the terrorists who kidnapped your mother, whatever) the "history" part of it means you're screwed if you didn't do something as simple as keep a fee free credit card without ever paying a cent of interest anyway.

      When I migrated to the US I, by virtue of just having migrated, had no credit history. I had to put a six month deposit down on my apartment - in NYC - it's enough money the oppportunity cost of having it in whatever account the land lord put it in where half the tiny interest goes in fees is noticable.

    7. Re:Very dumb way to live. by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      Untrue. Credit is also used to:

      Insure car rental agencies against you damaging the car you rented
      Verify you can be trusted to rent high-end audio equipment
      Cover damages to hotel rooms you may incur
      Screen you from acquiring government security clearances
      Complete transactions wherein transferring cash is impractical (eg purchasing online)

      A few of those can be avoided with cash deposits in varyingly usurious amounts, one of those can be gotten around with credit-card-like debit cards (though not if you don't even have a bank account, of course), and the one of those that you just can't get around isn't one that has an impact on most people's careers.

      But the point is that credit is used for more than just incurring more debt. Can you do without it? Certainly. But it's a financially terrible decision, since it means you'll be renting your residence for your entire life (unless, of course, you have the self-discipline to spend fifteen years saving a few hundred grand in cash - and then assuming that your non-interest-bearing cash savings ever catch up to the price of a home given inflation).

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    8. Re:Very dumb way to live. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to get a large limit, put 2 to 3 grand on a card and pay it off ASAP. I several cards now (none accruing finance charges -- paid off every month). Discover $13,000 limit. Visa $23,500 limit. Master Card (most recent card) $6,000 limit. Large limits are not hard to build up. Of course I would NEVER come close to those limits unless I wanted to commit "Interest Seppuku."

    9. Re:Very dumb way to live. by methodic · · Score: 1

      At this point it doesn't even matter. Cash used to mean something, it used to represent something, but you should just consider the money you get as "fun tickets". I'd love to see you visit the Federal Reserve and exchange your "legal tender" for gold. The dollar is way over-inflated, they (the US government) should just admit the balance between what is in the reserve and the cash/coins in circulation hasn't been in sync for over 50 years and just start using "credits" like in Total Recall.

    10. Re:Very dumb way to live. by steak · · Score: 1

      Also, you WILL WANT A BANK ACCOUNT! qft, i don't know of any college educated people who get paid cash or go down to the local liquor store to cash their paycheck from big company x
    11. Re:Very dumb way to live. by harl · · Score: 1

      If you're paying it off every month why would you need your limit raised?

      --
      I find being offended by me offensive.
    12. Re:Very dumb way to live. by taustin · · Score: 1

      By the time you're 30 and haven't started, most institutions won't extend you any anymore.

      That's just not true. And I know it's not true, because I've been there. When I got my first car loan (over the age of 30), my credit history was, literally, a blank piece of letterhead. The best way to establish a credit history is to buy a car, because if you put 50% down, *anybody* can be financed for the rest (provided they have sufficient income to make the payments), and car payments seem to be just about the best thing you can do for your credit rating (as in, making them all, on time).

      When this clown decides to join the civilized world, and he will, he'll have to go through the motions, but it's not that difficult if you're not in a hurry.

    13. Re:Very dumb way to live. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      car payments seem to be just about the best thing you can do for your credit rating (as in, making them all, on time).

      Over time, it can certainly help build or repair your credit. But if you already have halfway decent credit, you'll take quite a hit for taking out the car loan in the first place and it'll take a while to recover through good payments.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    14. Re:Very dumb way to live. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I would agree with all of the above except for the following: "If you're over 20 and you haven't started already, you're way behind the game". One can be "over 20" and still be in college, with not substantial means of income. At this point, "establishing credit" means getting credit cards, which is manifestly unwise when one is effectively unemployed. There won'r be any problem getting credit after graduation.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    15. Re:Very dumb way to live. by russotto · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but I have heard that paying off credit cards every month (and thus not accruing any finance charges) is viewed negatively by financial institutions, and may actually hurt your credit score instead of improving it. They aren't making any money off of you, so they won't raise your credit limit (and why would they need to, if you aren't making purchases that raise your balance close to the limit anyway).
      There may be one or two issuers who feel that way. The rest of them, faced with someone paying off their cards every month, just continues raising credit limits and sending more and more card offers. You could anthropomorphize this behavior as them trying to "tempt" you into overextending yourself, but it's probably just algorithmic.

      After a while of doing this you'll probably hit a ceiling and they'll stop raising your limit. If you want them to raise it more, you can then stop using that card -- they'll often either raise your limit or offer you an upgraded level of card.

    16. Re:Very dumb way to live. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting.. So in US merely not having a credit card gets you into equivalent shit as what happens here when you don't pay your bills for long enough that it goes to the court.

    17. Re:Very dumb way to live. by schotty · · Score: 1

      Well very true. I have lived by and love direct deposit. I do know a few people that for some reason just do not want a bank account, and prefer getting raped by the check cashing centers to cash a check and buy money orders. For me, I cannot justify paying the exorbidant fees for cashing and for money orders. Its the occasional ebay purchase that dislikes paypal that they get the $5 a year out of me on -- and thats it.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
  38. wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shit that makes it on to ask slashdot is fucking ridiculous and this is a classic example. I have real IT issues that are continually rejected for garbage like this.

  39. What, no mark?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Using cash is helping the terrorists! If you have no mark on your forehead, I'm calling the cops.

  40. Step 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop dealing drugs and get a real job. I mean seriously, if not from a bank, how do you get your money in the first place? allowance from mom and dad? tooth fairy scam? 20s tucked into your g-string when you're dancing in the strip club on Saturday nights?

    The degree of small-mindedness that you exhibit shows that you have never had enough money to actually have to worry about someone seriously ripping you off.

    1. Re:Step 1 by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      And if he really does get his money from the Tooth Fairy, then nothing makes people more suspect that a guy who pays everything by cash... They'll come looking for that fairy.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
  41. Cash is not something you can trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have dollar bills. Each of them buys a pack of gums. Your total fortune on this world is £20,000, hence you can buy 20,000 packs of gum.

    Someone in the government decides to print money. In fact, they (somewhat simplified) decide to print one dollar note for every dollar note already existing.

    Suddenly, your total fortune is $20,000 and it allows you to buy 10,000 packs of gum, while the government's new-found fortune allows them to buy 10,000 packs of gum as well.

    Funny these things. If not trusting, it's only gold you can trust.

    Of course, I would evaluate the chance of banks going bad (and hence a reason for avoiding credit) to be very unlikely, equally unlikely (or maybe slightly less likely) than for the government to print money.

    Lenin said the way to crush rich people was to grind them between the twin millstones of taxation and inflation.

  42. Hw are you every going to save for anything by fozzmeister · · Score: 1

    _Every_ single year you will _loose_ a percentage of your wealth which is equal to that of the inflation rate. This is not so bad if your a student with limited savings, but if your saving for a house or a car your going to be losing a lot of money each and every year. The only way to stop this is to have a bank account (or other investments) that pays equal or more than inflation+your tax rate.

    1. Re:Hw are you every going to save for anything by aminorex · · Score: 1

      That's the most ludicrous argument in favor of a bank account that I have ever heard. It is a reasonable argument in favor of a brokerage account, however.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    2. Re:Hw are you every going to save for anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he loose his wealth? I'd think he'd hold onto it.

      Internet Law 16: Emphasized words are infinitely more likely to be spelled incorrectly.

    3. Re:Hw are you every going to save for anything by bucky0 · · Score: 1

      because inflation makes it so that each dollar buys less and less things. If you put a dollar in a shoebox in 1900, it'd be worth a _lot_ less now.

      --

      -Bucky
  43. Naive question: Debit card? by RasmusW · · Score: 1

    A perhaps rather naive question from a non-american: Isn't it possible to get a simple debit-card to go along with a bank-account?

    This is the default situation here in Denmark. Virtually everybody have the national debit-card ("DanKort") which give access to your money for pretty much all purposes (including online shopping). The important thing to notice is that since it's a DEBIT rather than a CREDIT card, you cannot use more money that what's available on you account (the bank _may_ allow the balance to be slightly negative). This is ALSO the situation with my VISA card - it's also a debit card in Denmark.

    1. Re:Naive question: Debit card? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      It's pretty much the same in the US, except that we don't have a "national" debit card. But that won't solve the OP's problem because he doesn't have (or want) a bank account.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:Naive question: Debit card? by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      The US does not have something like that, nationally, there are the Visa (PLUS), and MasterCard (Maestro, cirrus) networks that are used nationally there, but from what I can tell, the banks just can't agree on how to get it done with full interoperability, their own networks are usually interoperable with one of the major networks, and most ATMs will take those major networks cards.

      In Canada, we do have a nation-wide EFTPOS system that works everywhere. It's called Interac (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interac). It is hugely popular, accepted almost everywhere, but it cannot be accepted online, except at some very specific retailers who take "Interac Online" payment. As of very recently, it can even be used in the US with their machines that uses the NYCE network (if you belong to one of the banks that made an arrangement with Interac, to allow NYCE to debit from your account, which includes all the major players except for CIBC (Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce) and BMO (Bank of Montreal), but 3/5 ain't bad for something that started 3 years ago.

    3. Re:Naive question: Debit card? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The important thing to notice is that since it's a DEBIT rather than a CREDIT card, you cannot use more money that what's available on you account (the bank _may_ allow the balance to be slightly negative).This is ALSO the situation with my VISA card - it's also a debit card in Denmark.
      are you sure about that?

      I was under the impression that proper VISA debit cards (as apposed to visa electron) some transactions don't go through instantly with all merchants and therefore its possible to go into the red (or go over your overdafraft limit if you have one) and that was why VISA electron cards (which aren't accepted in anywhere near as many places as proper VISA debit cards at least here in the uk) exist for people the banks consider too risky to give a real VISA card to (kids and those with poor credit histories).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Naive question: Debit card? by RasmusW · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that proper VISA debit cards (as apposed to visa electron) some transactions don't go through instantly with all merchants and therefore its possible to go into the red (or go over your overdafraft limit if you have one) and that was why VISA electron cards (which aren't accepted in anywhere near as many places as proper VISA debit cards at least here in the uk) exist for people the banks consider too risky to give a real VISA card to (kids and those with poor credit histories).

      In Denmark the VISA card (usually made as a dual DanKort/VISA card) is by default a debit card, no matter who you are and how much the bank trust you. It's up to the bank to decide how much they will allow the balance to go into the negative.

      I believe you can get some of the other international cards (Diners/MaterCard etc) as a "real" credit card. But the DanKort/VISA card combination is the most widespread one.

  44. Pound Notes are Pound Notes by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're only venturing into fraud / theft of services / obtaining by deception territory if a court of law decides that you had no intention to pay. You turning up at the office with actual banknotes demonstrates an intention to pay. If they refuse a reasonable offer of payment, they may well (inadvertently) be agreeing to give you something for free.

    It's a bit like the case of the student who got a wealthy lawyer to sponsor his university education in law, on the basis that he would hand over the entire proceeds of his first case by way of complete and final recompense. Immediately upon receiving his degree, he signed on the dole and made no attempt to get a job as even a minor partner in a law firm. His sponsor took him to court for breach of contract; the graduate represented himself. Either his sponsor's payoff would amount to nothing (because he had lost his first case); or the decision of the court would be that he didn't have to pay his sponsor anything (if he won the case).

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    1. Re:Pound Notes are Pound Notes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contract law in the US is a little different. A contract requires that both parties receive something from the other for a contract to be legal and binding. This can be money, services, goods, or even a promise of non-action (ie: money in exchange for not bringing a lawsuit). So in your story, a US court would more than likely require the graduate to repay the tuition cost since he never gave anything in return. The exception would come if there were other stipulations, such as "represent acme law firm with the highest honor" which would prove that the law firm did in fact receive something in exchange for their paying his tuition.

    2. Re:Pound Notes are Pound Notes by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      That is awesome and asshole-ific. The internet hereby approves.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    3. Re:Pound Notes are Pound Notes by pixelite · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reference for where you heard that story from, a link of some sort? I'd to
      hear the details, it sounds like an interesting story.

      --
      >>Sig under construction
    4. Re:Pound Notes are Pound Notes by zen-theorist · · Score: 1

      It's a bit like the case of the student who got a wealthy lawyer to sponsor his university education in law, on the basis that he would hand over the entire proceeds of his first case by way of complete and final recompense. Immediately upon receiving his degree, he signed on the dole and made no attempt to get a job as even a minor partner in a law firm. His sponsor took him to court for breach of contract; the graduate represented himself. Either his sponsor's payoff would amount to nothing (because he had lost his first case); or the decision of the court would be that he didn't have to pay his sponsor anything (if he won the case).
      wow, i cant believe the wealthy lawyer didnt see through that one.
    5. Re:Pound Notes are Pound Notes by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      that sounds like an internet chain letter or a bullshit story from reader's digest.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  45. Learning by ktappe · · Score: 1

    Presumaby you are attending University in order to learn; to expand your horizons. Consider this incident one of your learning experiences at school: You need to move beyond your distrust for the entire banking system. There--you've just received your first lesson of the semester without even attending a single class!

    --
    "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
  46. I buy my Tinfoil hats with CASH!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    OMG where is the conspiracy theory shop? Word is it only accepts cash...

  47. For your future: start banking by alodien · · Score: 1

    It's already been said several times that you need to start establishing credit - but you are also going to need a bank account sometime in the future for many jobs. Okay, not all require it - but I do know the last two employers I have worked for require direct deposit. Also, I work for the federal gov't now, and you are required to have a credit card to go on official travel - at some point, you will need to learn to be a little more trusting of established financial institutions!

  48. What "legal tender" means by amyhughes · · Score: 1

    I've seen posts with this link that still got it wrong.

    It is not a matter of past or present debts, or debts already incurred verses about to be incurred.

    It means that if cash is accepted, then this bill must be accepted. A merchant can not insist on bills backed by precious metals (they were, decades ago), or bills that are not creased, or "the new style" bills, or "the old style" bills, or bills printed after such-and-such a date, or...

    1. Re:What "legal tender" means by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      So "NO BILLS OVER $20" is illegal? Interesting.

    2. Re:What "legal tender" means by stdarg · · Score: 1

      In that case the "no bills over $20" would be illegal, which the Treasury page you linked to said is actually legal. The page says a private business can place limits on what cash is accepted.

    3. Re:What "legal tender" means by amyhughes · · Score: 1

      No. A merchant can limit the denomination they'll accept (e.g. no large bills, no pennies) provided their policy is consistent and non-discriminatory and does not diminish the value of legal currency. Legal tender just means that all cash money instruments issued by the US government are "real money".

      Checks are not legal tender, so a merchant can refuse them based on any criteria they like, even if they have a policy of accepting checks.

    4. Re:What "legal tender" means by amyhughes · · Score: 1

      And "legal tender" may mean something else in other countries.

    5. Re:What "legal tender" means by amyhughes · · Score: 1
    6. Re:What "legal tender" means by geek2718 · · Score: 1

      OK, so what about vending machines that didn't take the new style bills when they came out. It sounds like that was illegal...right?

    7. Re:What "legal tender" means by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      Expanding on the previous poster, does that mean a merchant must accept all previous versions of the $1, etc. bills that have been printed? Then how does the Treasury the currency in light of advances in counterfeiting? I could print some easy-to-counterfeit 1920 bill and merchants have to accept it since their authentication methods can't distinguish real from fake.

  49. Join your local Credit Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the banks, you might want to consider a credit union. In your area, I believe you would be eligible to join http://www.uiecu.org/.

  50. Get a Visa/Mastercard where you preload... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goto the local Grocery or Pharmacy store and pickup a prepaid credit card so when you want to fill it up, you fill it up and go see those idiots to make a payment via this method.

    Atleast they will be happy and you can sleep well.

    Otherwise, get a Capitol One Credit card instead. ;)

    Go ahead indulge yourself...

  51. Travel, see the world. by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

    "No one wants to deal in cash any more"

    Broadly speaking, that's very much not true. Here in Japan, everything can be done with cash, and usually is. None of my friends have credit cards or debit cards, to my knowledge.

    I used to live in Canada, and we got swept up in debit-card mania much more quickly than most countries. I lived off a plastic card for several years, but eventually realized the headaches exceeded the advantages and went back to always carrying cash. (What headaches? Stuff like hidden or unexpected user fees at both the retail and bank end; debit machines that stop working; cards that stop working; being stranded at the till when your card fails to have enough balance; debit networks that go down during power outages and peak shopping times; check-out queues that slow to a crawl as people try all the cards in their wallet to make a purchase; etc.)

    --
    He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    1. Re:Travel, see the world. by glenstar · · Score: 1

      Hehe... your post brings back memories of the first time I got paid while living in Tokyo. I was expecting a check but instead got an envelope... stuffed with 1M yen. Only in Tokyo can you walk down the streets with that much money (about 8k when I was there) in your pocket and not even think twice about. Of course, I also learned very quickly that a) 1M yen is not very much money in Tokyo, and b) one can get a pretty mighty hangover when one has that much money in cash on them on payday.

  52. cash is cash except when it is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, congrats on NOT running up debt with credit cards and other bad habits. It may be old school, people may think you wierd, but working things in cash works. Yes, as you move on in life you will need to think of savings and investments - banks ARE useful and have their role. You don't NEED 27 credit cards and two mortgages to prove you are 'worthy'.

    As for accepting cash - I ran into this with my first apartment. They said they needed a $100 deposit just like in your case. I pulled out a $100 note and they would not accept it. It had something to do with regulations and rules - they prefer a non-cash instrument for traceability. As usual you can thank someone a 100 years ago for causing this rule to be invented.. "cash? what cash? you never paid us a deposit."

    So yes, go the the grocery store or PO and get a money order. Pay them, and then look at a few good banks in your area. Open a basic checking account and learn to keep a checkbook. Open a savings account and put some money IN there on a regular basis. You will see yourself grow as you stretch a little to embrace life.

  53. Please keep us informed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose you'll find a job where they pay you in cash as well? Even if they just have 50 employees and everyone gets paid a flat $300/week, that's still $15,000 in cash sitting around for pay day. Please keep us posted on where you end up working, what day is pay day, and preferably a building plan with the Human Resources office highlighted and any air vents leading into the HR office well-marked.

    Cheers!

  54. The number of the beast? by tepples · · Score: 1

    it's quite likely that using cash for large transactions will become illegal. Or even using cash at all; Dutch banks already want everybody to use a kind of credit chips. I can think of six hundred sixty-six reasons why that won't happen in the United States.
  55. Go to a grocery store by slarrg · · Score: 1

    Grocery stores sell money orders very inexpensively. Much less than the post office.

  56. RU Screw by Orleron · · Score: 1

    Wow, do you go to Rutgers, by chance? That sounds exactly like the kind of thing they would do just to screw someone over.... sorta like the time they took away my financial aide AFTER the semester was over.

  57. Legality by harris+s+newman · · Score: 1

    From the story: "I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash. However, they refused to take the cash. Is it legal for a state-owned university, let alone any business to not take legal tender?" From my extensive legal experience anyone who doesn't trust banks which are fully backed by the federal government shouldn't be using federal notes either. I can't believe a flake like this gets a story on slashdot while my legitimate posts on technology go unposted.

  58. Go To 7-11 and Buy A Money Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbass

  59. take off the tinfoil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and open a fuckin checking account you nut job

  60. Staying off the record if you like. by Valdrax · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The "grown up job that doesn't pay cash" is really the only big problem, but even then you can go to a check cashing place and pay an exorbitant rate to get your cash. I mean, you don't *have* to do direct deposit. Manage your expenses wisely, and you'll never need a loan or a mortgage.

    If you need a credit card equivalent, try PrivaCash. I heard about it on a privacy website. It's basically a pre-paid debit card that isn't tied to your name. You can pick up preloaded cards in stores, but if you want to reload them, you have to deal with the bank that backs them. You can't do things like rent cars or do other things where access to a debt source is used in the place of a deposit, but you can make purchases online.

    Really, though, unless you are planning on living completely off the record as much as possible once your stint in a university is done, go for a credit union. It's like a bank, only not evil (or at worst significantly less evil). Avoiding a bank is very, very hard in modern life. For more details about what you lose in terms of privacy and how to protect yourself to a limited extent, check out the book "How to be Invisible" by C.C. Luna.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Actually, yes, in many cases you DO have to do direct deposit. My job will not print me an actual check, because they've outsourced their payroll. We don't even get physical paystubs anymore.

    2. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Control+Group · · Score: 1

      I mean, you don't *have* to do direct deposit

      This is becoming increasingly untrue. The last two places I've worked - DBA both times - have mandated direct deposit only. I can't be completely certain, I suppose, that I wouldn't have been hired had I not filled out the direct deposit form...but since it was with the paperwork that included my citizenship and tax withholding forms, along with the official application, I suspect I would have lost the jobs.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    3. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by bilbravo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe I am naive, but how is being good with your finances going to get you out of a mortgage? Car loans, other loans, yes. Mortgage? I'm not sure how you get there. Unless you are born with a silver spoon in your mouth or someone gives you a house, you're going to need a loan to buy one. Unless you're going to save up and rent some place in the meantime, but my guess is renting something for the amount of time it's gonna take you to save $X thousand dollars is NOT BEING GOOD WITH FINANCES. Leasing is silly if your end goal is to own.

    4. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Manage your expenses wisely, and you'll never need a loan or a mortgage.

      And you'll also be living in a shabby 1-bedroom rental in the bad part of town until you're 50 years old and can afford to buy a nice house for cash -- the same nice house you could have already been living in for the past 20 years if you had taken out a mortgage.

      Some debt is not a bad thing, if it improves your quality of life and you have a reasonable plan for repaying it.

    5. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Sinistar2k · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you do have to use direct deposit. My employer actually mandates it for everyone in order to reduce the administrative hassle of distributing checks.

    6. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you live, but I have had more than enough money to buy a house without any sort of loan or mortgage. I saved up a lot of money in high school and worked for a few years until I saved up enough money to get me through the first three years of college. When I started college I had close to $40,000 saved up for the purpose. Had I decided to just not go to college and keep working that would have been plenty for a small house in my area. Yeah, it wouldn't be anything fancy and would probably need more money in maintenance than a more expensive newer house, but the point is it could be done. Not every house is a new $300,000 house in a city somewhere.

    7. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is becoming increasingly untrue"
      Is it? All you've got is completely anecdotal evidence that doesn't even prove anything. They may include those forms simply because that's the typical package that the majority of people use. Your cowardice in not asking HR a simple question [assuming that you didn't want to do direct deposit] is telling. But it is not proving that direct deposit is required. It's merely proving that there's something wrong with you.
    8. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      My last place of employment (and this one) both also mandated it. However, they had the ability to cut a check if they had to (the last place) in fact, one of my coworkers was having issues with the IRS (oops stock options/capital gains screwup) and his lawyer advised he get a checks cut rather than doing direct deposit.

      Something about slowing the IRS down while they negotiated, because they could it the money in his account easier than actual wage garnishing, and they didn't want the IRS just taking the money while they were still trying to work out a settlement with them.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    9. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Whip · · Score: 1

      Manage your expenses wisely, and you'll never need a loan or a mortgage.

      So, uhm, where exactly do you plan on living?

      I mean, you can live on the street. Ok, doesn't require a bank or money, but not very comfortable.

      You can manage your money wisely, and store it in the ratty mattress you sleep on under the bridge. Assuming it doesn't get stolen, you'll eventually save up enough cash to be able to buy a house outright. Eventually. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere, though, where housing prices are mega-cheap.... you're going to be sleeping on the street for a looooong time first.

      Or, what's most likely, is you'll find someplace to rent where the landlord will take cash. This may be about as far from "managing your money wisely" as I can think of. You pay thousands of dollars over the years, and end up with nothing to show for it at the end. With a mortgage, you get this thing called equity. That means that after paying thousands of dollars into where you live, you come out the other side with something worth thousands of dollars.

      Now that's bad financial management for you right there, yep.

    10. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you get this thing called equity

      Assuming you can manage a mortgage that builds equity, instead of one of the interest-only ones that never goes away but is likely to be the only way you can afford to buy a rotting lump of termite nest that the previous owner is convinced is worth twice what they paid for it despite the fact that they haven't made a single improvement to the property in 20 years.

    11. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends where you live. There are many places now where you can't even find a house under $400k. Where I live houses in the $170k range go on the market every once in awhile, they are always very small and require significant repair work. My own house is around $230K, there is no possible way I could save that much money up in a reasonable timeframe. By the time I reached the $230K to buy the house it would be worth even more money!

    12. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If staying off the record is the point, he's already gone seriously wrong by attending a university, which leads to me to wonder what the point is if there is any.

    13. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by pclminion · · Score: 1

      The "grown up job that doesn't pay cash" is really the only big problem

      It's not the only problem. Only an idiot keeps their savings in cash form. Why? Inflation. If you have savings and they aren't earning AT LEAST the contemporary rate of inflation plus tax, you are LOSING BUYING POWER.

      Banks are INSURED these days. If you have no debit card (and thus no debit card for someone to steal), and no check book (or you keep your checks locked in a safe), HOW ON EARTH could the bank not be SAFE?

      The submitter of the article is a doofus who probably wouldn't mind losing his housing anyway, since he is apparently a paranoid ascetic who would probably fit right in with the ranting lunatics living on the streets downtown.

    14. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Nuts to both of you! Where I live, half a million dollars buys you a crappy condo with a 45 minute commute.

    15. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by mi · · Score: 1

      Manage your expenses wisely, and you'll never need a loan or a mortgage.

      Right. You can live 15 years in a cheapo rented appartment saving money for a decent place, instead of getting a decent place right away and paying it off in 30 years.

      Does not make sense to most people, though...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Be happy. Here is buys a small studio with a 30 minute commute.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    17. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by ShorePiper82 · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking similarly. I live in New Jersey. Surviving is just about only possible through credit. Next stop: boardwalk pizza rewards credit card.

    18. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by evilviper · · Score: 1

      how is being good with your finances going to get you out of a mortgage?

      Buying a home within your means... As long as you make more than minimum wage, there is a tiny stamp of land nearby with a "structure" on it with four walls and a roof that you can afford to pay off almost immediately. At that point, you can start saving up for something larger if you want.

      Personally, I have a large family, most of whom are smart enough to have a savings. When somebody in the family needs a large amount of money, there are plenty of people willing to lend part of it (at no interest).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by maxume · · Score: 1

      "Risking" the minimum balance to have an account at a bank would be quite a bit cheaper than cashing checks anywhere else, at least over the medium/long term...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    20. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Buying a home within your means... As long as you make more than minimum wage, there is a tiny stamp of land nearby with a "structure" on it with four walls and a roof that you can afford to pay off almost immediately. At that point, you can start saving up for something larger if you want.

      That may be true if you live out in the sticks, but there are many markets out there where even the most modest homes are $200,000 or more. Even in my area, the cheapest townhomes (800-900 sq feet, side-by-side row homes) are around $130,000, which is probably atleast $1000/mo for morgage, taxes, insurance, and association fee. You have to be working a bit more than minimum wage to afford even that.

    21. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I know someone that had the ID stolen and there bank account emptied. Do you know what made solving the problem a lot eeasier? he didn't have direct deposite. WHen he went to the bank, he had his check. He found out what happpened and got a new account.
      If he had DD he would not have had any money to eat with and take care of neccessities while he got his life beck together.
      Also, he has good friends that saw to it that he had food and gas.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:Staying off the record if you like. by marklandm · · Score: 1

      I just want to point out that many jobs today, at least ones I know of, don't necessarily give you paper checks; all the money passes hands via direct deposit.

  61. "ALL debts" by whitroth · · Score: 1

    So, what part of "this bill is legal tender for all debts, public and private" doesn't the university get?

    But we've seen this before. Back in the mid-seventies, a friend had just gotten into the Merchant Marine. He and a friend came ashore in Galveston, and wanted to rent a car to drive back home to Philly. Car rental place refused to accept cash. They offered to put their entire paychecks as a deposit - something like $5,000 in mid-1970's dollars - and the car company refused.

    Bout 10 years later, the car companies were grudgingly accepting money....

                mark

    1. Re:"ALL debts" by Corydon76 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but until he actually resides in university housing, he hasn't incurred any debt. This is a deposit, remember.

    2. Re:"ALL debts" by stratjakt · · Score: 0
      From the US treasury:

      The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."

      This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.


      All debts mean all debts to the government, or all debts you perhaps have a legal judgement/lien on.

      So you can refuse to pay in cash upfront, get sued, lose, and then get to pay with your precious, precious cash.

      As the quote says, it's no less legal to deny cash than it is for a bus or a vending machine to demand exact change.
      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  62. You've obviously never been in trouble... by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1

    Because the courthouse will not accept checks or credit cards. When the State absolutely positively needs to get paid, they do demand cash. Sure, they will accept checks on stuff like tags and licenses, but if you ever get arrested, it is cash or money order, and that is about it.

    1. Re:You've obviously never been in trouble... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I was arrested, they'd take credit cards for bail but they'd only run it as a cash advance. And I didn't know my PIN. They wouldn't take debit cards, didn't have an ATM, and I didn't have sufficient cash. So I spent a little longer in jail waiting for someone to figure out where I was.

  63. Not a Debt by pete-classic · · Score: 1

    I think that "legal tender" only applies to settling debts. Since you have not yet incurred a debt with these people you cannot insist that they accept legal tender.

    If you think I'm wrong I don't think you'll have any trouble finding a lawyer that will take cash in advance ;-)

    -Peter

  64. Hippie by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

    Now I do NOT have a checking account, a credit card, or anything. I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash.

    Sounds like an anti-capitalist corporations-are-evil,-dude/stick-it-to-the-man type hippie.

    Yeah, I said it, big whoop, mod me down like I care.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  65. The Real Problem With Using All Cash by greyfeld · · Score: 1
    My father-in-law was like you, never used a bank, didn't believe in insurance and always did everything in cash. Now this was 10 years ago, so it was easier to do then. The problem was that he kept all his money at home. He even had an ancient postal safe out on the screened in porch where he kept his cash, guns and other trinkets. When their house caught on fire (or was torched as I believe), they lost everything. There was no insurance and the house and its contents burnt to the ground. We couldn't get to the safe during the fire and when we came back the next day the door of the safe was wide open and all the cash gone. Either someone had come back and pried open the door or the safe was not as fire proof as he had believed. Regardless, they now had nothing, nada, zip. Oh yeah, whoever got the cash out of the safe left a few guns, they are harder to spend.

    I guess that my point is that doing basic transactions in cash works fine up to a point. As other posters have said, at some point you will want to buy a car, house, boat, whatever that will cost a lot of money. While you may find some people willing to sell you these things using cash, the vast majority of these transactions require a credit check (of which you have none) and a loan or, at the very least, a certified cashier's check. Get a bank account and quit whining.

  66. I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posting anon, for obvious reasons.

    Back in the day, we had a pissed off taxpayer and his wife bring in several thousand dollars in pennies. At the time, we had real teller functions in most cities and they took their money-handling chores seriously and by-the-book. All cash payments were *required* (no exceptions) to be counted out twice in the presence of the person paying.

    The manager saw the situation, got approval to put a teller on overtime, and started counting. They stressed to the taxpayers that they *must* remain present during the count. This was fairly early in the morning. After a few hours, some things began to change. Everytime the taxpayer needed to go to the bathroom, the count had to stop and everyone left the room. No lunch. No breaks.

    Asshole taxpayer got bored. Then he got tired and cranky. Then he and his wife got into it. A screaming match ensued with the wife berating her husband for his stupid idea. "Yeah, you really showed them, didn't you?!" By that evening, she ripped the car keys out of his hand and left, telling him he could get a cab home. This was in a large, non-compact city with poor public transport and, at the time, only a shell of a taxi system. Telling him to catch a cab home was the equivalent of telling him to burn in hell.

    Around midnight, the count finished. The jerk was shellshocked. He called a cab and proceeded to go stand out by the highway and wait for it. I don't know if it ever came.

    I feel certain, however, that Mr. Idiot never tried another stunt like that.

    1. Re:I work at the IRS by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

      I don't know his reason for doing this or how valid it was, but it looks like he made two mistakes.

      1. He didn't arrange for others to do it alongside him. Every community has a few people who are pissed off at the IRS and would be willing to do something like this. You might have had a harder time dealing with it if ten people had showed up to pay in pennies.

      2. He brought his wife. Bringing your woman along for a protest without being 100% certain she's on your side is a bad idea; nine times out of ten she'll stab you in the back once things get rough. I would count letting her take the car keys and letting her hit him as mistakes as well, but they could have easily been avoided by not taking her along, or not marrying her in the first place.

      I'd like to see something like this play out with a bigger crowd.

    2. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a pointless exercise. The guy doing the counting doesn't make nor can he change policy. None of the people working in the office can change the policies either. The IRS doesn't give a rat's behind if you pay in pennies or hundred dollar bills because you're paid your taxes, they've got their money.

    3. Re:I work at the IRS by carlivar · · Score: 2

      To me this sounds like the "master" disciplining the "slave" for having the temerity to question authority.

      --
      Vote Libertarian
    4. Re:I work at the IRS by ranton · · Score: 1

      I dont see how this would piss off the IRS agents. They get paid whether they are staring at a wall for 8 hours, or counting pennies for 8 hours. If fact, they may actually like the overtime.

      The only ones I can see getting pissed off is the other taxpayers that are now waiting days in line to pay their taxes because a few assholes are holding up the line.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    5. Re:I work at the IRS by aminorex · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Posting anon, for obvious reasons.

      Because obviously no one would ever tolerate you again, as long as you live, once they found out that you once worked for the IRS?

      Or because obviously you anticipate death threats, stalkers, polonium in the toothpaste, snipers....?

      Or because obviously you're just making this stuff up?

      Personally, I find the word "obvious" to be only rarely correct.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    6. Re:I work at the IRS by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Personally, I find the word "obvious" to be only rarely correct.

      Jesus, what a dick. Don't you have kindergarteners to molest or something?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:I work at the IRS by turrican · · Score: 1

      > Posting anon, for obvious reasons.

      Naw, it's not because of any of the reasons you listed (death threats, stalkers, being employed by the IRS itself) - it's probably because the OP *is the guy* that did it.

      It's like when someone tells an embarrassing story that happened to an unnamed "friend" of theirs that you've never met.. To me, THAT would be the most obvious reason for posting anon.

    8. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy doing the counting could quit. He's not forced to work there. Exactly how would the IRS do what it does to people if everyone (admittedly, this is nearly impossible) refused to work for them?

    9. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me the law that requires anyone to pay Income taxes to begin with. ... Whats that you can't///// OK!

    10. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know what they call people who think income tax is voluntary?

      Prisoners.

    11. Re:I work at the IRS by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Income tax is totally voluntary!

      Don't want to pay it, don't have an income. Sales tax, property taxes, and most other taxes are also voluntary in similar ways.

    12. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or because the story is about when he worked at the IRS and the government has rules against relaying stories from such agencies. Maybe you should have posted anon?

    13. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, sure. ok, this is not very believable at all. sounds like bullshit to me. even if it were true, nothing was done but waste several peoples time, no more, no less. wow.

    14. Re:I work at the IRS by shaze · · Score: 0

      Income tax should only be paid for profits and gains, not labour or income.

      You Americans are retarded. Revolt!

    15. Re:I work at the IRS by XSforMe · · Score: 1

      This would not piss the grunts who serve behind the teller windows, this would piss the managers of the office responsible for receiving the money. If there are 4 tellers, and 10 taxpayers of them show up and pay in pennies the office production would halt for several days.

      --
      My other OS is the MCP!
    16. Re:I work at the IRS by SleepHead · · Score: 1

      He probrobably got the pennies from a bank. Wouldn't they already be in rolls of $1? You just have to count the number of rolls.

    17. Re:I work at the IRS by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      Really? You may want to tell that to all the people convicted who used that argument in court. Ask Wesley Snipes how that argument is going for him..

    18. Re:I work at the IRS by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My argument was that income is only taxable if you have one. The multi-millionaire Wesley Snipes has an income.

      Is there a single person with no income who has had to pay income tax on it?

    19. Re:I work at the IRS by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      He probably just unwrapped the rolls first.

    20. Re:I work at the IRS by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      No. It's a jerk being shown how the victims of his pigheadedness feel.

      If he felt the tax was unjust, he has every right to lodge a legal challenge, or if he really wants to, refuse to pay and go to jail. The IRS will treat him in the same way afterwards if he does that.

    21. Re:I work at the IRS by emj · · Score: 1

      Have you ever counted money? It's pretty dull work, and just counting pennies all day long is going to be very very boring work. So I bet you they are going to care.

    22. Re:I work at the IRS by Sharth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably because it's illegal for him to post that information? Privacy requirements and such.

    23. Re:I work at the IRS by carlivar · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but anyone who chooses to work for the IRS is also a jerk in my eyes.

      How do you feel about the IRS ruining boxer Joe Louis' life? They refused to let him deduct the proceeds of two fights that he donated to the U.S. Armed Forces during World War II.

      But Joe obeyed and didn't cause any trouble. That's what's important, right? Obedience?

      --
      Vote Libertarian
    24. Re:I work at the IRS by jimbolaya · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, um, what'd he use to pay for the cab?

      --

      There ain't no rules here; we're trying to accomplish something.

    25. Re:I work at the IRS by Lehk228 · · Score: 0, Troll

      what the hell does one bureaucratic cocksucker half a century ago ago have to do with treating an IRS clerk like shit because you are a childish douchebag?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    26. Re:I work at the IRS by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Pissing off the IRS agents may not have been the point. Hand counting pennies once, let alone twice, costs more than the pennies are worth. He won an important victory by costing the IRS more money than they made by attempting to screw him.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    27. Re:I work at the IRS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No, it sound like the IRS had a solid policy that ensures that the taxpayer and the 'teller' get a level of service and protestion. Counting the money twice is a good policy for both both parties.

      The fact that mister dick weed brought in pennies is his own damn fault.

      Legally, the IRS doesn't have to take them, so they went above and beyond with their customer service.

      I would speculate that if mister deckweed said "haha guys, I'll bring cash tomorrow." they would have let it slide a day. Of course, then he would need to tkae it to the bank, where they would want to count it twice. UNless he lived in vegas, then he MIGHT find a place to spin it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:I work at the IRS by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      IRS employess get thousands of dollars a day?

    29. Re:I work at the IRS by hendridm · · Score: 1

      3. What are the chances that they are going to be audited next year?

    30. Re:I work at the IRS by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but anyone who chooses to work for the IRS is also a jerk in my eyes.

      Do you feel the same way about the people who live off the money the IRS collects as well? People like US soldiers, those people who build roads, and the Justice department? Taxation is unpleasant, but it's justifiable.

      How do you feel about the IRS ruining boxer Joe Louis' life?

      Why blame the IRS? They were obliged to collect the taxes. The government didn't make Armed forces donations deductable. If the IRS wanted to there was no way they could let him off. I'd hate to seee a situation where the IRS is allowed to make judgement calls based on whether or not they like someone.

    31. Re:I work at the IRS by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      No need. Pennies are really worthless. There are only 3600 seconds in an hour. If they count two at a time, with a 1 hz cadence (which I don't think anyone could keep up for 8 hours if they're not used to it) that's only 72 dollars per hour. Counting salary, benefits, and employer taxes, their time is probably worth about $50/hour to the state, and that's not even counting overtime.

      So yes, the cost to count them is of the order of their value.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    32. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IRS gets paid the same amount no matter what it costs to collect the taxes. They are not goingto have a cash shortfall. All that will happen is there's marginally less money in the government coffers so they have to marginally increase borrowing. The whole protest gets absorbed into administrative generalities.

    33. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great story, asshole. Not only did you take a large chunk of the man's heard-earned money, you ruined his marriage over a contest of who could be the biggest prick. You won, prick. Fuck the IRS and fuck you.

    34. Re:I work at the IRS by gonzo67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the argument used by Wesley Snipes (and others recently convicted) is that they do not have income.

      Schiff is the leader of this group...(http://www.quatloos.com/taxscams/cm-taxpr .htm). One of the arguments they use is that wages are exchanges of property rather than taxable income.

      Obviously, it fails to actually win in court but that is the argument.

      And, the wealthy can avoid income taxes. If your source of money is from dividends, you don't pay income tax on them, you pay capital gains taxes (which is a lower rate!).

    35. Re:I work at the IRS by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Bringing your woman along for a protest without being 100% certain she's on your side is a bad idea; nine times out of ten she'll stab you in the back once things get rough. I would count letting her take the car keys and letting her hit him as mistakes as well, but they could have easily been avoided by not taking her along, or not marrying her in the first place.

      I'm thinking you have that part down pat.

    36. Re:I work at the IRS by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Who pays for the IRS?

    37. Re:I work at the IRS by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Mcdonalds does bad shit to 3rd world countries. Let's go to the local drive-through and harass the teller(You know spanish right?)

      It's protest at the wrong people with the wrong means.

    38. Re:I work at the IRS by mmalove · · Score: 1

      "Income tax should only be paid for profits and gains, not labour or income.

      You Americans are retarded. Revolt!"

      It would no longer be income tax then. More correct would be tax shouldn't be paid for labor/income, only profit/gain. Which is a luxury businesses get to enjoy, but not individuals.

      Yea, it kinda irks me. But the system is also set up to allow the poorest to not pay taxes, and in many cases they actually get tax money back from the government each year in various credits. This gives the system enough supporters that a revolt will never happen.

      --
      You can get 15 minutes of fame, but you can go down in history for infamy.
    39. Re:I work at the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe that you are not required to accept large amounts of money in very small denominations.

      http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AlS2k JtdQLJY.JhJt312PIQjzKIX?qid=20070605055423AApYF95

      Especially the fifth answer under "other answers".

  67. You deserve to get the shaft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you are too stupid to know the difference between 'lose' and 'loose'.

    I hope you end up living under a bridge.

  68. Credit doesn't ALWAYS mean debt by jrand · · Score: 1

    I thought the same until I went to switch cell phone providers.

    The company I wanted to switch to required an obscene deposit if you had no credit history. If you had some credit, there was no deposit. That's when I found out that credit was also about trust. What you've done with your money in the past is a good predictor of what you will do with your money in the future.

    I used a credit card for a little while (buy something, pay off that month) to build up some credit. Now I still have the card, but I never use it. (I've actually been meaning to cancel the card for a while.) I have absolutely zero debt at the moment, and I don't plan on acquiring any anytime soon. But I DO have some credit, and I'm sure that will serve me well at some point in the future.

    I suppose that this is one of the side effects of a global / national scale economy. It used to be that you could earn the trust of people you did business with because they knew you. As more and more things move outside of the local scale, there needs to be some other measure of whether or not they should do business with you. For better or for worse, it seems your credit rating has become that measure.

    1. Re:Credit doesn't ALWAYS mean debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't cancel the card, just don't use it (cut it up, if you must). How long you've had your oldest current credit card apparently factors into your credit score (probably has something to do with people using one card to pay off another).

      A credit score is largely based on how much credit you have available [the more the better], and what percentage of it [the lower the better] is currently used (in addition to your payment history). If you keep the card, spend $10 on it every month and pay it off immediately, your credit score continues to go up. Your credit card company may actually decide to increase your credit limit as your score increases, and if you continue to barely use that credit -- voila: positive feedback on your credit score!

      IANAFA.

  69. Credit scoring by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    If you pay it all off before interest is calculated for it, then it doesn't help build your credit in most cases. Isn't that correct, or am I duped?


    You are mistaken. Your score benefits from your regular payments, even if your payment is the full balance.
  70. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You will need credit. Not just to buy and sell. To get an apartment. To get a job. To forge other relationships with various institutions that want to evaluate your trustworthiness with something other than your own claims about yourself."

    What are you smoking over in the US? "You will need credit to get a job" ? Last I checked, employers are supposed to pay you, not the other way around...

    And monetary matters are a goddamn private matter over here in europe, as long as you're not trying to get credit or loans from someone. Employers checking your "credit history"? That's off limits here, and good riddance!

    Evaluate trustworthiness? You'll have just have to use common sense after having talked to me and my references, now don't you? Or get my police record, if you're a sensitive government employer that are allowed to ask for that by law (default is forbidden, of course)...

    Nosy bastards.

    1. Re:What? by steak · · Score: 1

      he may bee referring to security sensitive government jobs, they run a lot of background checks to get someone a security clearance. it wouldn't surprise me if a credit check was one of them; not because your required to have good credit to work for the government, but because it is one more way for them to validate you are who you say you are.

  71. You're a moron. by Pope · · Score: 1

    Now I do NOT have a checking account, a credit card, or anything. I don't trust the banks, or the credit card companies, so I am one of the few people who do EVERYTHING in cash.

    Trust them about what, exactly? If you're some paranoid idiot who dislikes THE MAN, just go to a fucking credit union. Do you have a job? How do you get paid, then?

    Seriously, grow the fuck up.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  72. Where do you keep your cash? by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    Do you keep it under your mattress? Hope you have a really good safe in your apt/house. I make >$100k per year and last year my house was broken into TWICE. You know what they stole? Macbook, No. Stereo? No. iPOD, No. 2 bass guitars? No.

    They stole the spare change I keep in a pile on my nightstand next to my bed.

    In the SF area this is quite common as the thieves know there are lots of people that keep quite a bit of cash and jewelry in their house (the stereotype is Asians). I have no cash in my house 'cept what's in my wallet (and the pile of spare change). Now, I own this house (pay a mortgage), and I know exactly who has a key, as I changed the locks on the doors when I moved in. A dorm? You can't install your own deadbolts, chains etc. The maintenance staff has keys to your room and _will_ go in there when you aren't around (ex. to test the smoke detector).

    One other thing to think of.. Let's say you have all your savings in your apt/house/dorm and there's a fire. What do you do now? If my local bank branch office burns to the ground, I still have my money.

    Sorry buddy, "not trusting" banks may sound cool to the those who hate "the man", but it's not practical, or financially sound.

  73. Build a cabin in the woods by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    Write a manifesto, but no complaints when the feds haul your cabin off on the back of a flatbed. Face facts: either you like the modern life enough to pay its price of admission or you don't.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  74. Cash ain't King... by realsilly · · Score: 1

    ... I've experienced something similar to this young individual's plight. I live within a commute to DC. I drive a chunk of the way up and then go to the Metro station. Well a few years ago, I pulled into the garage and saw that parking was $3.75, to be paid on exit. No where when I entered the structure did it say, it had to be paid on a Metro card.

    At the end of the day I went to leave and found I couldn't without going to buy a metro card. So I go to buy one for $3.75. WRONG! They charged me $5.00 to buy the card and told me that I could not buy one for less then $10.00. Sounds fishy right? Sadly it is all perfectly legal.

    The parking garage is a privately owned operation. So I was subjected to having to use their currency. Next, I asked in a letter to them why I was force to spend $10.00 to get out of a $3.75 parking garage. They explained that attendants were stealing from them, so they are passing the bill to me to buy the technology of having to use their card. Next they mentioned that the card could / would be useable for the Metro too. I was livid, but had no course of action for within the station, it posted that the garage fee was to be paid via a metro card and those were the terms of using the service.

    So as I've read the Treas.gov link I realized even more so how F'd up this system is.

    When we see the $ we naturally assume cash because that is how we've been trained to think. $ = money. So really the terminology should be changed, to Credit or Check value without the use of $'s. It is a huge undertaking, but if you expect people to use your currency you should define it before services are ever rendered which allows the customer / client to decide if it is indeed worth bringing their business to you.

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Cash ain't King... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No where when I entered the structure did it say, it had to be paid on a Metro card.

      This is not true, they all said so when they started that policy. You just missed it.

    2. Re:Cash ain't King... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      While the OP has the issue of not having a /debt/, and thus the university is not required to accept currency, it seems like in your case the legal tender rule applies - what other basis do they have to require you to pay but a debt, or a contract - and in the latter case, since you were not made aware of the need of the metro card, I don't know if that'd be legal either.

      IANAL etc

  75. Re: AC: Old Testament vs. New by everphilski · · Score: 1

    That's old testament law. It was done away with when Christ fulfilled it.

  76. plausible deniability by doug · · Score: 1

    It is a shame that CYA is such an entrenched part of our society. I'm not faulting you for your attitude. I just can't help thinking that as a people we'd be better off without all the double speak, legal loopholes, and so forth.

  77. go get a money order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude....you dont need a bank account or credit cards or ANYTHING to get a money order!!!! you just need one thing...CASH. oh hey...looks like you got some of that.....

    when did slashdot start posting stupid questions?

  78. Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (-1, Troll)

  79. Banks sell your info by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Banks sell your info. Read the privacy policy. Read the weasel words they stick in, usually near the end, where they say they do go ahead and provide information where permitted by law. Sounds like they are restricted, but selling your information to marketing and credit businesses is permitted by law and they are basically saying they will do it. And most do it, even when you ask them not to. Then if you threaten to close the account if they don't stop, they will let you close the account because they are probably losing money on you, anyway.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  80. Not so hard in Chicago by GodInHell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are money order and check cashing places on every other corner around UIC. Just take your cash to them, pay your 5% ludite fee, and pay the damn bill.
     
    -GiH

    1. Re:Not so hard in Chicago by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Ironically, the we actually get a non-luddite bonus. The credit card companies charge a fee for operating the credit card, but the credit card companies require that the price be the same as cash to the consumer.

      As a merchant myself, I find cash (and checks) a hassle and am perfectly content to pay the exorbitant fees for letting them handle it. I don't even want any money orders. So I'm all for the luddite fee.

  81. Cash? by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

    We call them "paychecks" and checks, but for most businesses all this stuff is transferred directly to bank accounts. I get a paper record of my pay on a paper, but the money just "appears" in my account at 2AM on payday. Some businesses still work the old way, but most employees of such companies find that very annoying :-)

    Most government payouts (tax returns among other things) are treated the same way.

    The only thing I still use checks for is my rent, because my landlord is an individual. Banks usually collect rent and mortgage payments automatically from your account. Insurance premiums are done the same way. My money mostly goes in the account by itself, and comes out the same way :-) I don't even receive paper bills from utilities anymore. Cable/phone/internet bill is in electronic format, same with electricity bill. I pay both online.

    There are small businesses around that won't take credit/debit cards, but they are very rare. Taxi cabs started getting equipped with the machines a few years ago, but they are still uncommon and are one of the few reasons I keep some cash on me. You can request a cab that will take debit/credit cards though if you want.

    --
    If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  82. A non-rhetorical question by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    Other posts are saying "Paper money only has value because we have faith in it having value", usually arguing in favor of a precious-metal standard instead.
    The non-rhetorical question is: What makes precious metals any different? Why do precious metals have any value other than the value we have faith in their having?

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    1. Re:A non-rhetorical question by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Because they are rare. You cannot "print" as much gold as you want, as governments do, creating inflation and through it making the poor pay your bills. You have to make careful usage of what you have, for once it's gone, it's gone.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    2. Re:A non-rhetorical question by sacdelta · · Score: 1

      Simply put, they are shiny. People value the actual metal in addition to just the value it represents. They are a physically held asset. Without faith of value, paper money is worth the value of paper with a pretty picture on it. Metals have other uses, in addition to jewelry they are used in many industrial applications, photography, computers, etc.

      --

      Brought to you by: "Al"toids - the curiously weird mint.

    3. Re:A non-rhetorical question by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Supply is only one side of the value equation; demand is the other. The fact that there is very little gold around, for example, is not all that is required to make it valuable -- people wanting to purchase it is the other side of the transaction.

      You're welcome to note that there is demand for gold, as long as you understand that I'm not claiming there isn't. But don't make the classic economic faux pas of assuming that gold has intrinsic value thanks to its rarity. Gold has value because people want it, and people only want it because it is perceived to have value. A supply-side cap only serves to simplify the economics by removing (or at least limiting) supply-side variance.

    4. Re:A non-rhetorical question by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      Sure, I'm in total agreement with you. The problem with a pure fiat money isn't that it doesn't have intrinsic value while gold would have intrinsic value. Neither of them has intrinsic value, and for that matter, nothing has. But the point is simply that fiat money allow governments to more easily manipulate to their advantage the value people attribute to it.

      When government prints money, it knows people will still sell goods and services priced according to the previous value for some time, without noticing that in keeping these prices the amount of money running around in the economy is greater than the amount of goods and services that can be purchase by it. That allows government to acquire more without having the actual means to, actually removing goods and services from the economy. The moment people notice what happened, prices rise, and then rise a little more, to accommodate for those goods and services that are missing since they went to government. Result: after inflation, things aren't simply equal. People lost actual goods and services to government, and have to produce more.

      That's why money printing, and the inflation it causes, is considered a hidden tax. Government (and its friends, namely banks, who received money earlier than everyone else) profit, people lose. And those who lose more are all those who have their income adjusted last. Namely: workers.

      A gold standard, by avoiding this kind of manipulation, is simply more fair. If government wants to tax, it has to actually tax, and face the election results of that, not hide what it's doing behind tricks so that no one except economist understands what's going on.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    5. Re:A non-rhetorical question by 808140 · · Score: 1

      Well, that's sort of the point of fiat money -- to make the money supply a policy variable. This fails spectacularly when the government mismanages the money supply, which has happened historically and tends to happen whenever the central bank is unable to act independently -- this is why the Fed and the European Central Bank are not beholden to the central government but instead to economists.

      The thing is, a supply-side cap on the money supply can cause serious problems, because economics is not a zero-sum game: the size of the pie is not fixed. If the economy is going to grow, the money supply needs to grow as well, or deflation occurs. Deflation is just as bad -- perhaps worse -- than inflation.

      The question really is, can you trust the group in charge of monetary policy to not fuck it up? The alternative is to cap the growth of the economy with a money supply that can't grow to match economic growth.

      Currently, the Fed and its analog in other countries deliberately targets a very low, constant inflationary value of between 2 and 4 percent. There are a number of reasons for this; one of the most often stated is that it provides investment incentive and insures that cash remains in circulation by making it financially unwise to hide money in your mattress, where it does no one any good.

      The cost of gold and other precious metals is not constant either, because the supply is not truly capped -- when someone discovers a major new ore, for example, the supply can fluctuate radically, especially since the supply of gold is not uniformly distributed in the world. For example, the Soviet Union had massive gold reserves, and under the gold standard, they were able to leverage this wealth without any real economic production. Very efficient economies like Hong Kong or Israel do not have their true value adequately reflected in a gold standard, because the entire system is warped by poor countries in Africa and Asia that naturally have massive reserves.

      The demand is also not constant -- other than people liking gold jewelry, gold is used in electronics and in other applications. When entrepreneurs find a way to substitute away from gold -- for example, using a ceramic or polymer replacement -- demand for gold drops and so its effective value drops. But wait, your monetary system is tied to the value of gold -- and so you have constant, erratic inflation and deflation. That's not good.

      Then there's the issue of foreign exchanges. With fiat currencies, foreigners who want to buy American goods must first buy dollars, and similarly, Americans who want to buy foreign goods must first purchase foreign currencies. This has an automatic balancing effect: for example, suppose manufacturing is very cheap in Japan and very expensive in the US. As a result, everyone buys Japanese products instead of American products, right? But the result of this is, demand for the Japanese Yen increases, while its supply stays roughly constant, and so the value of the Yen falls relative to other currencies, such as the dollar. The lack of demand for the dollar causes the value of the dollar to fall. As a result, American goods, which were previously not price-competitive with Japanese goods, decline in price on the world market, boosting the American economy.

      Now, when everyone was on a precious metal standard, the only foreign exchange markets were due to differences between silver, gold, platinum, or whatever. If America and Japan were both on the gold standard, demand for Japanese yen translated into demand for American dollars, because both were backed by the same commodity. This negated any possible balancing effect, making competition in international markets far less dynamic. This is similar to the problem with the US and China today -- China pegs its currency to the dollar, and so the falling price of US-made goods on the international market causes the international price of goods manufactured in China to fall as well, despite China's incredible economic growth. Thi

    6. Re:A non-rhetorical question by 808140 · · Score: 1

      [F]or example, suppose manufacturing is very cheap in Japan and very expensive in the US. As a result, everyone buys Japanese products instead of American products, right? But the result of this is, demand for the Japanese Yen increases, while its supply stays roughly constant, and so the value of the Yen falls relative to other currencies, such as the dollar. The lack of demand for the dollar causes the value of the dollar to fall. As a result, American goods, which were previously not price-competitive with Japanese goods, decline in price on the world market, boosting the American economy.

      Sorry, the emphasized should have been "increases", as should be obvious from context. My bad. Should have read the preview more carefully.

    7. Re:A non-rhetorical question by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      glad somebody with apparent knowledge and a better grasp of language said it instead of me :)
      these were all the exact thoughts I had which lead to my original question, pretty much.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  83. Really BAD Idea by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 5, Informative
    I Am A Landlord.

    What you describe is extremely counterproductive for landlords. Where to begin?
    1. As a landlord, you don't pay much tax on your buildings. Because you're only paying tax on your profits, and expenses are astronomical in the rental industry, and you are allowed to depreciate your property for tax purposes, often landlords will show a tax LOSS (or a modest profit), even while turning plenty of profit. Even if you underreport your income, you won't decrease your tax liability by much or anything at all.

      Example. Many landlords like a unit to cash flow $100/mo after expenses (mortgage, taxes, insurance, repairs, maintenance, advertising, vacancy, collections, credit loss, etc.) That $100/mo can easily be swallowed up by depreciating the building. Of course, depreciating the building will lower your cost basis and increase your capital gain when you sell the property, but google "1031" for more information on how to fix that little snag.
    2. When you are applying for a loan or attempting to sell a building, you want to show that building to be operating as profitably as possible. Non-residential real estate is priced based on a multiple of the building's earnings (as opposed to comps), so if you are only declaring 50% or 75% of your rental receipts, you have just decreased the value of your building! Also, you will make it much harder to get a loan because banks want to see earnings. And yes, they absolutely do look at your tax returns.
    3. When deciding where to be, erm.., creative on your taxes, always remember the following maxim: If you're caught overdeducting, you pay a fine. If you underreport income, you go to jail.
    4. You open yourself up to fair housing problems. Picture this: a tenant doesn't pay his rent, so you evict. Nothing fancy there. But let's say that this nonpaying tenant is black, and wants to mess with you because he's mad that you evicted him (or he really feels discriminated against. Doesn't matter.).

      He calls some infomercial contingency-fee lawyer, sues you for fair housing violations, and during discovery, finds out that ALL of your tenants are underpaying. By 25-50%! But a quick glance at the court records reveals that you did not evict all of them. Why did you single out this one tenant, hmm? Oh, you are in for a costly court battle, settlement, and/or judgment now. Unless you are prepared to testify under oath that you belong in jail for underreporting your income. (And prepared to pay your attorney $10,000.00 for the privilege)
    Bottom line, this is really the wrong industry to underreport your income in. This is why, even with all of the shady landlords out there, you never see landlords being busted for underreporting.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:Really BAD Idea by simm1701 · · Score: 1

      No idea about landlords in the US - but I know a few personally in the uk that follow the cash in hand system - and it is simply for the reason of paying less tax.

      Different countries different loop holes

      --
      $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    2. Re:Really BAD Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a "loop hole" to not report income, it's fraud.

    3. Re:Really BAD Idea by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Funny

      You pick up a dollar off the street. Do you report it on your income tax? No? You're a tax evader!

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    4. Re:Really BAD Idea by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I believe for the IRS you can pick up $9,999 off the street scot free.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  84. Get yourself a money order by provigilman · · Score: 1

    Don't know if it was mentioned elsewhere, but just go out and get yourself a Money Order. Yes, you will have to pay a small fee in order to get it, but Money Orders are great alternatives to checks and you can pay for one with cash. If you're in the US I know that any currency exchange will be able to give you one, or barring that you might be able to find a bank willing to do it.

    --
    "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    1. Re:Get yourself a money order by sacdelta · · Score: 1

      Your local post office should also be able to provide you with one.

      --

      Brought to you by: "Al"toids - the curiously weird mint.

  85. thieving students... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my old university, checks were only accepted for certain things because of concerns that student employees would skim.

    Of course that never happens now...

  86. He does'nt trust banks? by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

    WTF will he do when he gets a job. Almost every employer now requires direct deposit. Will you tell them "fuck you, i don't trust banks."

    1. Re:He does'nt trust banks? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      He's gonna be one of those 'college for life' dudes. What does he need cash for?

  87. the real reason they won't take your cash by steak · · Score: 1

    Your a student at their university and you can't spell lose. So this is their way of telling you have been expelled.

    1. Re:the real reason they won't take your cash by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1

      "Your a student at their university and you can't spell lose."
      Considering you wrote "your" when you should have written "you're", I think this means you're qualified to make forum posts on the Internet. Congratulations!
    2. Re:the real reason they won't take your cash by steak · · Score: 1

      my incompetence is not the issue here.

  88. US Gov't Refused to take my cash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years ago, I was living in the US, and had a Green Card. Had wallet stolen with Green Card inside. Went to INS to have Green Card replaced. Fee was $110. Tried to pay in cash because I figured that was more secure than a cheque. Needless to say, they refused to take my money, even though I had exact change. Prior to visiting the office, I got the amount of payment, and the person I spoke with never said anything about not taking cash. Also, in the office there were no notices about how payments could be made. I even showed the INS agent that the money has printed right on it 'Legal Tender' but this had no effect.

    Long story short, I had to come back the next day with an approved form of payment.

  89. Money Order by jonadab · · Score: 1

    If they'll take a money order, the quick and easy fix is to go to the nearest post office and get a money order. This doesn't cost very much, and you don't have to involve a bank. Trusting the USPS (that issues the money order) is not substantially different from trusting the treasury (that issues the cash).

    Yes, there *is* a small cost for the money order, but you have to weigh that against the cost of your time, calling up the housing department dude's superior, and his superior, and giving them one earful after another until they hate you, and so on and so forth -- all of which may get the problem resolved, or may not. Or the cost of a lawyer, which is even more.

    BTW, the USPS is the most cost-effective place to get a money order. Everyplace else charges at least as much, often more.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  90. Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm of the philosophy that the home ownership race is just another rat race right now. The majority of the reason why two-income families in America today have less savings than single-income families of 50 years ago is that home prices have more than doubled since then (adjusted for inflation).

    I'll have no part of that for a few reasons:
    1. I live in the city. All the even close to affordable houses are well outside what I consider a reasonable commuting range.
    2. It's just plain cheaper to rent. Sure, I'm not storing up equity, but really neither are a lot of people on subprime mortgages. At least the money I'm saving is being put into investments.
    3. I predict that once the baby boomers get a decade into retirement (with no kids in the house and failing health) a lot of them are going to start moving out of houses; many of them will be moving into "assisted living" centers. Houses in areas near good schools are going to get a LOT cheaper in the next ten years. At that time, I'll reevaluate whether owning a home is a good thing or not, but unless you can solidly plan to put down roots for the next 30 years where you are right now, owning a home might be an unwise investment.
    Leasing is silly if your end goal is to own.

    So? What makes owning such a great goal to have in the first place? If your privacy or your paranoia is so important to you that you'd go through life without a bank account, then going without owning the house you live in isn't so bad in comparison.

    Frankly, I'm paying about 1/2 to 2/3 what I'd pay for a mortgage on a home or condo in my area. My insurance is significantly cheaper, and I wouldn't have enough deductions to qualify for a tax break anyway.

    Consider this wise or unwise as you wish, but I was able to live for half a year without a paycheck to go volunteer in the local election last year, and I had no fear of losing a place to live. I know that I'm fortunate to be in a very high income bracket due to my choice of careers, but I could get by comfortably with a third of my income because I live below my means.

    Home ownership is overrated, if you ask me.
    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      So? What makes owning such a great goal to have in the first place?

      In your situation, not owning a home makes sense. I neglected to mention that there are situations where renting is/can be a good idea.

      However, I still stand behind my assertation that if owning a home is doable then it is smarter, because a home is an investment. That is why it's a great goal to have...

    2. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Damvan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My mortgage is about half what I'd pay in rent for an apartment in my area.

      Buying/owning a home isn't any more of a rat race than buying a car. Buying more home than you can afford is. Most people buy way more than they can afford.

    3. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      However, I still stand behind my assertation that if owning a home is doable then it is smarter, because a home is an investment. That is why it's a great goal to have...

      Did you know that it's possible to invest in other things?

      Heh, let me ease of the sarcasm for a minute:

      Even though a home is an investment, it's not necessarily the best use of the money. Homes typically appreciate much slower than e.g. stock indices and are far more illiquid, and have much higher transaction and carrying costs. It's true that there is a strong correlation between "renters" and "people who wouldn't invest the difference if they could", but if you're not one of those people, it can turn out better.

      I didn't want to turn this into a "rent or buy" massive subthread, but I wanted to point out the comparison you need to make when thinking of a home as an investment.

    4. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by japhmi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Frankly, I'm paying about 1/2 to 2/3 what I'd pay for a mortgage on a home or condo in my area. My insurance is significantly cheaper, and I wouldn't have enough deductions to qualify for a tax break anyway.


      Rents go up, mortgages don't. My dad is currently paying 1/4 to 1/3 for his mortgage what it would cost to rent a house in his neighborhood, and 1/2 what a small apartment would be. That's because he's owned the house for years.

      Mortgages are horrible at first, because they take up a large chunk of your money. After a while, you get raises and your mortgage stays the same. Checking out my old apartment, it's already gone up $200 since I moved out, and another $200 (maybe 2-4 years down the road), it will be equal with my mortgage.

      Yes, there are cases where it may be better to rent than own, but there are probably more cases where it makes more sense to own.
      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    5. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I'm paying about 1/2 to 2/3 what I'd pay for a mortgage on a home or condo in my area. It's a fairly good bet that your landlord has your apartment mortgaged. Even if he doesn't, then market pressure dictates that your rent is going to be roughly even with other apartments that are mortgaged. In order to for the landlord to stay in business, you have to pay him more than he has to pay for the mortgage. Maybe a home mortgage would cost more, but when you compare apples to apples it's always more expensive.
    6. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      How fast does that money that one spends on a lease appreciate? That's what I thought.
       
      Now I'll stop with the sarcasm as well :-) But seriously, you raise a good point--buying a home should not be THE investment. After all, unless you move to another area, you'll likely keep it for a very long time--so you won't see that return. So to your point, don't buy a home to make money--unless you intend to become a landlord!

    7. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      How fast does that money that one spends on a lease appreciate?

      The relevant comparison would be to the appreciation of the investments bought with the savings from renting. I know, you were mirroring my sarcasm, but you should have also mirrored the fact that it was otherwise a valid point. It's important to remember that when buying a home, you *also* throw away money -- but instead of on rent, it's on appraisals, lawyers, BS closing costs, real estate agents, property taxes, interest, HOA fees, and additional insurance.

    8. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      My mortgage is about half what I'd pay in rent for an apartment in my area.

      How long have you had your morgage? Making comparisons to morgages where the ink dried back in the 1990's and 1980's isn'n really fair if you looking to buy today.

    9. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      in the current market real estate cannot be depended upon to appreciate over the medium or even the long term. the market was white hot and because of that prices in many areas are just plain silly. $100,000 to $500,000 for a tiny plot of land and a shitty recently built house. also with a rental the property cannot become a liability to you. if your insurance is insufficient you will be up a well known creek without a paddle if, for example, your home is damaged or destroyed by flood, and you don't have flood insurance. there is no home but you still owe the money.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    10. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      My rent is 1/3 of what you'd pay for a somewhat nicer condo in the area. I'd give you better number, but the cheapest condos are $500k. They are prolly nicer, but I can't afford it anyways. Welcome to the hotel California...

    11. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      Firstly, I think a lot of this depends on your geographical area. In a lot of parts of the country, a person with sufficient credit will find that their mortgage is less than their rent payments for an apartment half the size of the house. At that point, it only make sense to purchase a house. I know a lot of people tend to be anti-debt, but just like with a business, debt financing for assets isn't necessarily a bad thing. Now, I'm not talking about going out and financing a 60" plasma TV. That TV will do nothing but depreciate in value, and will not contribute anything to your overall ability to generate wealth. Now a house, on the other hand, will generally appreciate in value and so it makes sense to finance one, so long as you can make the payments -- especially if the payments are less than rent. A car, while it won't appreciate in value, usually contributes to one's ability to generate wealth by transporting them to and from their employment, so A car makes sense to finance in that case.

      Anyway, it's all a moot point if you have no credit history, as you'll not be able to buy a house without one. Living off the grid is fine as long as you don't desire to own anything of significant value until much later in life (assuming that you are able to save up the case to buy said significant value item).

      Personally, I think the question poster just sounds like an immature kid who wants to complain about not getting his way. I can't see why he wouldn't want a bank account and a desire to obtain credit unless he truly desired to live incognito, off the grid. If that were the case, he's already failed by attending university. Attending university generates a whole ton of paperwork, and not just at the university itself. You also have things such as the FAFSA application that you are required to fill out each year, which is basically a government credit check to determine how much student aid you are elligible for.

      So, the poster says he doesn't trust banks. Why not? I would genuinely be interested to hear of a legitimate reason not to trust a federally insured institution with my hard earned dollars. It may make me think twice about storing my own money in a bank. Yeah, banks may make mistakes from time to time, but one just needs to keep track of their balance in their account and pay attention to their transaction statements. This is no different from needing to keep track of how much cash one has on hand at all times. The only thing I can think of is that the student is either a) earning his money through illicit means and attempting to keep the authorities from discovering this fact and/or b) is illegally misreporting his yearly earnings in order to perpetrate financial fraud against various agents of the government -- he's trying not to pay taxes and/or he's trying to keep his income level low enough to qualify for federal student aid. Or maybe c) he's just a naieve kid who doesn't have any real reason aside from some silly, paranoid, mistrust of any sort of authority.

      My advice to the poster: grow up. Open a bank account or get a money order and quit belly aching. You'll need to do it eventually if you ever plan to have a real job.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    12. Re:Renting isn't always a bad financial choice. by Damvan · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, I purchased in summer 2000. The appraised value (as of summer 2006) was 4 times what I paid. Indeed, welcome to California.

  91. Money Orders $0.75 at a US Post Office by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to deflate the "That's Preposterous!" bubble (because I totally agree that all businesses should take cash for privacy reasons), but...

    Money Orders are $0.75 at a US Post Office, last I checked.

    So spend 15 minutes, pay an extra 75 cents, and secure your on-campus housing.

    Then, come back and continue the conversation.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
    1. Re:Money Orders $0.75 at a US Post Office by dacarr · · Score: 1

      Look, man, I don't know what planet you live on, but if I go to the post office, I'm lucky if it takes fifteen minutes! =^_^=

      --
      This sig no verb.
  92. I too, work almost exclusively in cash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is probably an insurance thing on their end. They can't accept cash on premises. Anyway, the easiest thing to do is run to a bank and get a counter check or run to the local post office or UPS store and get a money order.

  93. so? by Katmando911 · · Score: 1

    Go to 7/11 and get a money order (which you can pay for with cash) and give that to them. The reason why they don't accept cash is the same reason why you're not supposed to send cash through the mail, it's too easy for somebody to pocket it and say they never received it. BTW, doing something to start building credit (like opening a credit card with no annual payment) would be a good thing if you ever want to get a decent loan for a house or a car.

  94. not necessarily fear of 'witchery' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Banks release your financial information to 3rd parties and will freeze your account at the behest of 3rd parties. They also charge you 20 bucks if you even look at them funny.
    My employer once paid separately for time spent at each location. I had a 52$ check issued by BB&T.. I go to the BB&T and they charged me 5$ to cash it - I couldn't even get 49.99. I don't trust 'em either. If I ever get rich, I'm paving my driveway with gold blocks or something in case I ever get arrested for overindulgence, etc. I can at least leave the country still.

  95. A Personal Pet Peeve by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1
    ...car dealership...wouldn't accept my credit card...

    I sincerely hope you filed a formal complaint with MC, Visa, AMEX, or whoever. A vendor signs a contract when they start taking credit cards. That contract invariably says they'll accept the card for purchases. If they can pick and choose, they'll deny the cc company valuable business. Card companies hate that.

    Ever see at the cash reigster those little signs that say "Minimum credit card purchase $10"? A simple complaint to the card companies will usually result in a letter to the merchant telling them that they are obligated to accept the card for all purchases. A threat of pulling the merchant authorization is always included. Those little signs disappear in short order.

    I can't imagine how strongly a cc company would hit a car dealership that robbed the cc company of as much business as you're talking about.

    1. Re:A Personal Pet Peeve by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1

      I was younger then, and didn't know they couldn't refuse large purchases, or I certainly would have. It's a good stick to have in the toolbox, though.

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  96. Irony by cyan · · Score: 1

    What's ironic here is that an account at the bank, if only to be used as a clearing account in a situation like this, would actually *help*. Banks are beginning to offer accounts with virtually no fees so long as you keep a minimum amount of cash on deposit with them, usually $1,000 or so. I presume this is because most people these days go paycheque to paycheque and leave virtually nothing in their accounts in the meantime.

    I can sympathize with the poster's situation, since I deal almost exclusively in cash myself. However, you know what I do when someone asks for payment in a form other than cash? I go to my bank, and they draft up a money order free of charge out of my savings account. I have yet to pay a single service fee to my bank for anything.

    So, there's really no excuse for not having a bank account. Go open a savings account at your local bank or credit union, and use it as a clearing account for christ's sake. It's not like the hundred or thousand dollar deposit that you'll have to declare on your tax return will really make a difference, will it?

  97. Plastic is in - paper is out by ptbob · · Score: 0

    For a while the Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles department that does recreational vehicles like boats and atv's wouldn't take cash, just checks, money orders and credit cards. Finally they caved in to customers demands. Unlike the Post Office. They are installing a thing called an Automated Postal Center in the bigger offices. This allows you to buy postage and mail letters and small packages. But... they don't take cash, just plastic. And to make it even less convenient they are removing the stamp vending machines that take bills and coins. Their motive is purely profit, not customer service.

  98. Love your spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I love your spirit. Mostly would not work here in Canada,
    Mostly regarding postages. They just bounce it back to you no questions asked. The only "trick" is to mark the return address as the destination. But it is a fraud to do so.

    >> they aren't going to chase anybody up for a lousy quid fifty;
    Many of my services (phone, electricity) charges a 5$ fee for any "late payment". I learned this by a "$5.12" added to my bill one month. It was all my fault.
    I got a cheque from my provincial government for 34 cents once. At the time it cost 42 cents to send an envelope, but they surely have bulk rates ;).

    In today's all computerized accounts, they don't care if you own them 50 cents or 10 dollars. When payment is due a bill is automatically printed and sent.
    Even if you cut the payment by one cent, it will simply be added to your next bill.
    For one shot providers, they can send notice to credit-bureaus. It does not say "This smart-ass customer did not pay 1 cent" it rather say:
    "2005/03/12 - insufficient fund payment"
    "2005/04/12 - no payment received"
    "2005/05/12 - no payment received"
    "2005/06/12 - no payment received - sent to recovery agency"

    What I do is the reverse, I OVER-PAY by a few cents or a dollar. They will then study the record, print a check and post it, often with a nice letter. Most business hates it when they own money to customers.
    Credit cards are funny for that, if the due amount is different than zero they print and send an envelope. When I get pissed of at one, I will overpay by 1 cent, and keep laughing once a month when I receive the "due amount: (0.01) credit DO NOT PAY".

    1. Re:Love your spirit by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      They will then study the record, print a check and post it, often with a nice letter. Most business hates it when they own money to customers. I've found they quite like it really. "Did we overcharge you? Oh, I'm sorry, let me credit your account so it'll be applied to your next bill." Your money goes into an aggregate savings account along with everyone else who has a credit and the company pockets the interest. It's also an incentive for you to keep your account with them.

      I know someone who accidentally got charged full price when RMA'ing a cellphone under warranty. After fighting with the company to fix it, his account now has a credit for the equivalent of six months of service.
    2. Re:Love your spirit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your money goes into an aggregate savings account along with everyone else who has a credit and the company pockets the interest.

      He/she is talking about pennies here. How much did it cost to send the notice (including overheard/salaries)?

  99. CC=Profit if managed correctly by phorm · · Score: 1

    Mismanaged credit-cards can definitely lead to debt, but using one correctly can lead to profit. I pay my card off fully every paycheque (before the bill-date, even). I also get flight points on mine, and got a $650 flight for $75 (they don't pay the taxes).

    I've never paid interest on the card, nor other fees.

    Not only that, but CC's are a good way to protect a purchase. If you have a scammy seller - maybe that won't honor a warranty on a recently-broken item - or various other issues with a purchase, you can in many cases charge it back. That doesn't work so well with cash...

  100. Making change by phorm · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that they wouldn't accept cow, it's that they didn't have two chickens and a hog to make change with at the time!

    1. Re:Making change by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, they just don't know how to properly accept bovine-based payment. Any competent cash cow-accepting business will have a cleaver behind the register they can use to carve out an appropriately sized chunk for payment. You just have to remember to bring a wagon with you to transport your remaining amount of cow if they have to cut off more than one leg.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
  101. I remember those days... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    ... though *I* had the courtesy to roll up my coins before paying with them. You've got to remember though. A pizza place in a college town, especially one that will deliver to the dorms, EXPECTS that kind of thing. Broke-ass college students scrounging for change on $5 pizza night is the market they've decided to cater to.

    (Even after I got out of college, I tried my best to live near universities for that very reason. Hungrie Howies had a large 1-topping carry-out for $5.99 all week long, and $4.99 on wednesdays. Sooo nice to have that sort of deal available, even when you're not reliant on it anymore.)

    Go shopping at a nice store in The City, though, and expect to pay with a sack full of pennies; and you'll get a quite different treatment.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  102. Why must you be difficult? by Penguin's+Advocate · · Score: 1

    I really don't get people who are afraid of banks and credit cards. Do you think that cash is somehow guaranteed while the money in your bank account or on your credit card isn't? The value of cash is tied to your government. Sure, in the US it *seems* pretty secure, but that doesn't mean it is. Plenty of countries throughout history have seen the value of their cash drop to nothing (a wheelbarrow full of Deutsch Marks for a loaf of bread anyone?). Unless you've got gold and diamonds in a safe in your house, your money is never guaranteed to be valuable. So get over yourself and get a checking account and a credit card. You're honestly just putting yourself behind by not having them. If you can't handle the responsibility of keeping track of your finances and paying your credit card bills on time, then you're just as lost with cash as you'll be with anything else. Also, it's much better to have no cash and some credit than to have no cash and no credit. Always remember, "he who dies with the most debt wins."

    --
    Frag 'em all...
  103. Stupidity by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1

    You don't trust the banks? Grow up.

  104. Where have I heard that before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > His sponsor took him to court for breach of contract; the graduate represented himself. Either his sponsor's payoff would amount to nothing (because he had lost his first case); or the decision of the court would be that he didn't have to pay his sponsor anything (if he won the case).

    That goes back to the ancient Greeks. And it was "once he won his first case" that he had to repay the cost of his studies, not that he had to give the proceeds from just that one case. Not that it matters.

    Of course, as I recall the ending to that story, they found in his favor because he had not, at the time of judgment, yet won a case. That made it a simple matter to sue him again and you win, the proceeds from that case being the debt it said he hadn't yet been forced to pay, even if you do it your way.

  105. Cash can be stolen by employees by Palmyst · · Score: 1

    Since cash doesn't leave a trail, unlike a check, and it is not made out to the intended payee, i.e. the business, it is much easier for employees to steal it and then claim the customer never made the payment.

    This is the reason businesses like this insist on checks and similar instruments. It is not some government mandated thing.

  106. Have any friends with a checking account? by BridgeBum · · Score: 1

    Simple solution: Have a friend write the check for $100, give them the check. Basically the same idea as the cashiers check option/money order mentioned above, minus the fee.

    --
    My UID is the product of 2 primes.
  107. never been far from home, eh? by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

    So, how do you do anything?

    Check into a hotel - credit card required for damage and incidentals.
    Rent a car.
    Take a trip abroad for a month? Just tape a few grand to your ass?

    Banks may be out to nickel and dime you with lame fees, but that's FAR safer than never having emergency options and always having a load of cash on you. Remember that if you're robbed of a credit card, it's far easier to see justice down the line than if someone takes all your "legal tender".

    And you're likely insane if you're not keeping all your cash in a bank's safety deposit boxes. Gonna prove to your insurance agency that your life's savings was under your bed when your apartment caught fire?

    Stubborn zealots and Slashdot...

    --
    Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
  108. Legal Tender for All debts ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Wikipedia article on "legal tender" is informative. (You can find it, I'm sure.) Also, notice that a statement is prominently displayed on US paper money explaining that is "legal tender for all debts, public and private." The important concept here is debt. You cannot force someone to enter into a debt relationship with you in which they must accept your legal tender. It is also possible to establish a debt relationship in which your legal tender cannot be used to pay the debt - think about bartering for goods or services in which the value is not stated in terms of "money." (Explanation based on my experience and opinion, IANAL.)

  109. Go to 7-11, get a money order, MORON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The public school system has obviously failed to teach you Finance 101. If you don't trust the banks, you can't participate in the American system. People swimming here from Cuba will enjoy what America has to offer and move up while you stay in the gutter.

  110. Fiat currency by slew · · Score: 1

    As I see it, those folks that constantly rail against "fiat" currencies and yearn for some sort of "backed" currency, should wonder what to back their currency with? gold? silver? diamonds? uranium? petroleum? or any economic goods/resources?

    The problem with any of these physical manifestation is that they are either scarce (the definition of an economic good), or are subject to spontaneous dillution (in the case of gold by digging it out of the ground) meaning the total value is subject to random discoveries.

    Although gold was generally considered valuable in-itself and thus tradable (remember even gold money is just a token for exchange), there are many factors to consider. What if "gold" (or whatever backing good was chosen) was suddenly more valuable (either due to a fashion fad, or a genuine economic discovery like say gold semiconductors for quantum computers). The economic value of "gold" would compete with the "backing" value of "gold". Or perhaps "gold" became less valuable (say somehow it could be extracted by killing babies or burning down rain-forests).

    If you think these things are unlikely, think about deBeers and diamonds and African wars...

    This is not to mention the fact that services (at least in the new economy) seem to have a greater aggregate net value that all the capital goods (meaning there aren't enough capital goods to even back the current amount of "wealth"). It seems very short sighted to base a token for exchange on something that is limited by production of available capital goods (because that would limit growth).

    I agree that fiat currency isn't the best situation to be in, but lacking a solid 'value' alternative, it just strikes me as just a lot of whining about "the-man"

    1. Re:Fiat currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I see it, those folks that constantly rail against "fiat" currencies and yearn for some sort of "backed" currency, should wonder what to back their currency with?
      How about a currency backed by honesty as in not dishonestly basing it on top of federal "debt" that is false in name and false in nature. Take off your tin-foil blinkers. The federal "debt" is too huge for it ever to be repaid. The federal bond buying spree by Asians is not sustainable indefinitely. The longer it goes on, the worse the pain when it comes to the end of the run.
    2. Re:Fiat currency by slew · · Score: 1

      How about a currency backed by honesty as in not dishonestly basing it on top of federal "debt" that is false in name and false in nature. Take off your tin-foil blinkers. The federal "debt" is too huge for it ever to be repaid. The federal bond buying spree by Asians is not sustainable indefinitely. The longer it goes on, the worse the pain when it comes to the end of the run.

      I'll take off my tin-foil blinkers (whatever in the hell that means) when you stop posting AC...

      But contrary to popular belief, the value of currency (or exchange token) is based off of "faith", (doesn't have that much to do with honesty). Apparently you don't trust the "full-faith-and-credit" of the US to pay it back, but the "Asians" buying the notes seem to be okay with it. Frankly, the fact that the US issues the exact same treasury notes to everyone regardless of their persuasion and seemly redeems them is being honest (unless you think people that are buying this stuff are all dillusional and think they got paid back when they really didn't). The buyers apparently have "faith" that the US government will pay back the notes (and they aren't getting counterfeit notes that they can't redeem, that would be dishonest).

      On the other hand, you can argue that these notes don't have value, but to some folks they do. It's like arguing that a britney spears album has value. To me, I have no faith that the music is listenable and wouldn't buy it so it has no value to me, but I'm pretty sure they are being honest that it is an album with music on it and it's the same one that they are selling to other people (some of whom apparently enjoy it).

      If you are arguing "credit", well that's not much different than a boomerang kid who lives off of money from their parents. As long as the parents (the note buyers) have faith that their kid (the governement) is going to make it in the world someday, they still finance them. Some observers may say that faith is misplaced, but that is between the kid and their parents.

      No currency is worth anything if there isn't faith and I'm sure most folks have faith that if the US government got into a situation where it couldn't pay, they would just print more money or tax the citizens approprately. That may cause dilution (monetary inflation), or taxed based recession, but and may seem painful to you, but going to a non-fiat currency wouldn't be in reality any different (if the government expenses were such that it needed more money, but couldn't issue bonds, or print more money because it would be tied to or backed by some arbitrary commodity, they would just increase taxes more to compensate, no?).

      In my opinon, inflation and taxation are really the only way to keep money moving in the economy (otherwize rich people would just sit on their money). For an example, real estate, they aren't making any more of it meaning the rich stay rich and the poor would have no hope. You might say they can "borrow" the money to improve their lot in life, but remember, the amount of "wealth" is fixed in a "backed" currency reality. In this scenario, it would be interesting to ask what would the economic cost of borrowing be (e.g, would a lender be motivated to lend at a rate that would allow a borrower investing in real-estate to make a reasonable profit?). Remember they are taking a risk that you won't pay back and they would lose that wealth forever. Since the number of people is increasing in the world, their wealth (in relative terms is increasing in a per-capita percentage, if they just do nothing...)
  111. Simple by ravyne · · Score: 1

    1) Get a damn money order, it'll cost you a couple bucks.

    2) Go to a Credit Union, they're far better than banks. Many offer debit/credit cards if you wish.

    Out of curiousity, how do you recieve your income check? Most banks don't cash checks unless you have an account, or charge for the pleasure. The only place to cash a substantial check is at a check-cashing broker, which also charge a good-sized fee. Being from a small town, I know things are different there; one can usually cash a fair-sized check on their reputation alone, but the city is different. MAybe you have a trusted friend/family member playing middle-man?

    Honestly, building a good credit record is a good thing. How many people are able to pay for a car/house/large whatever with cash outright. Even if you have enough cash for the down payment it still can be hard to structure a payment plan for the balance if you've got no credit history. Getting a house is basically essential for the financial success of most people these days, as it frees you from burning money on rent and instead builds your own equity.

    1. Re:Simple by geekoid · · Score: 1

      he's just starting college, probably never had a job that pays with a check....probably never had a job at all.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  112. He'll wear a tinfoil hat to job interviews... by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    ...so I think getting a job will be a bit problematic.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  113. Intrinsic Value by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Precious Metals Have Intrinsic Value...

    Slashdot is so full of socialists, they barely understand what 3rd world peasants easily grasp!

    1. Re:intrinsic value by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Well, beaver pelts make a nice hat, or coat. Maybe a scarecrow beaver giant?

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  114. Don't trust the banks? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    Not to be rude, but what, exactly, is not to be trusted? Do you think they're going to steal your money? Go under? Did you live thru the depression, and are yet somehow currently enrolled in college? Were you raised by elderly parents or grandparents who did? Privacy concerns?

    My opinion, your money is way safer in a reputable financial institution than in a pickle jar in your dorm room closet. WTF?

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  115. Nor does the IRS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IRS sent me a letter saying I owed $300.

    So I walked down to the Fed office building with $300.

    Got my probing from security and want upstairs.

    Asked if this was the place to pay the $300. Was told yes. Put down 3 $100 bills and pushed them across the counter.

    The older lady said "We don't take cash".

    I looked at the bill, took a swig of snarcohol (Distilled snark) and read the part about 'all debts public or private'. Asked if the $300 was a 'public debt', and was told yes. Then I again presented the $300 and was again informed how they could not take cash.

    (and the state DOES take cash. So I bike to the state building and pay my taxes in cash.)

  116. give money to friend and have them make a check by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Just go get a money order from the post office or even a convenience store.

    Better yet, just go ahead and give the money to a friend who does have a checking account, and have them write the check for you.

    I spent about 6 months of my life without a bank account (it's a long story, but not necessarily an unusual one.) It really wasn't that bad. I could endorse checks over to a friend who cashed them for me through their own bank account. I took my paychecks and endorsed them directly to my landlord, who would give me cash back if I overpaid.

    Obviously there was a certain amount of inconvenience, and I was spreading that inconvenience around onto my friends who had to go to the bank occasionally.

    On the other hand, if you are dealing only with cash, you spend your money very differently. There was an article recently about how spending cash activates pain receptors in the brain, but using credit cards does not (and I suspect the same for debit cards as well.) When I didn't have bank accounts, I was much more careful with the money I spent. To this day, if I find myself spending too much, I flip back to cash for a bit and force myself that way to budget.

    The slashdot community is full of people who have always had money in their lives, in some way, so many of the responses here are incredulous at the idea of someone who could live without bank accounts and credit. It's done all the time. It really isn't that big a deal.

  117. It depends if you owe them money or not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Briefly, if there is a debt, then "legal tender" means that they MUST accept it in payment of that debt. This is all British common law predating American independence. I seem to recall that U.S. currency still has "This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private" printed on it, which is the same point more clearly.

    I don't know about the U.S., but in Canada, they don't have to accept it then and there, but they must stop claiming that you're late. You've fulfilled your part of the obligation; if they don't have a cashier that they trust available, that's THEIR problem. As long as you are ready to pay with reasonable notice, you are NOT in default.

    So what you should do is document that you offered payment in legal tender to person X at office Y on date Z, and then you're covered if they start complaining.

    On the other side, if there is NOT a debt, then a merchant is not obliged to sell you something for cash. They can say "credit cards only" and decline to enter into a sale contract if offered cash. They can also insist on payment in Euros or Flanian pobble-beads. But if there's some problem with the credit card after you've walked out with the goods, and they say you still owe them money, then you can settle that with cash.

  118. 300 $100 bills don't take that much room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a fat wad for a pocket, but they fit easily. And the last car I bought for cash, they didn't even blink, just counted it twice.

  119. acceptability of cash by secPM_MS · · Score: 1
    As has been pointed out, a vendor does not have to take cash in payment for services to be rendered. It is not even obvious to me that they "have" to always take cash for items purchased -- cash is expensive and dangerous to handle and large cash transactions have onerous governmental reporting requirements associated with them. -- All large cash transactions have to be reported to the government in the US, and probably in most the rest of the world. I would note that once it becomes known that you keep large amounts of cash around, some of your fellow citizens who are far less trustworthy than the banks will seek you out. You will not enjoy the ensuing transaction.

    On a practical operational point, if you have cash and need a check, get a money order or cashier's check. The cost is modest. If your point is to minimize monitoring, open a checking account and use it prudently. You will attract less attention than if you try very hard to fly below the observational radar. The attempt to fly below the observational radar in and of itself makes the flyer of definite interest to both agencies monitoring criminal activity as well as governmental organizations concerned with terrorism. You do not want to have them deciding you are up to no good.

    There are very few things in which you can place absolute trust (outside of death and taxes). The question is, what is least untrustworthy? There are lots of potential subjects of interest. If you don't want observation, do not draw attention to yourself. Note, living in a cash world or not, you still will need to file income tax forms when you have income. The IRS can be quite difficult to deal with if you do not have appropriate documentation.

  120. You prove my point by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    My point is that most people do not understand good debt vs. bad, and you are no exception. It is a shame that our educational system does not prepare people to make important financial decisions.

    Here are the criteria you put forth for taking on debt:
    1. Use of funds must be a huge amount of money proportional to your salary
    2. Saving up the funds is impractical or purchaser lacks the discipline to save
    3. Can afford 2x the "minimum payment"
    So answer me this, should I buy a $50,000 diamond ring for my wife on a jewelry-store consumer loan? After all, $50,000 is a huge amount of money proportional to my salary, the minimum payment on a consumer loan is typically 4% of principal, which would be $2000. I could afford double. And, yes, I think it's impractical to save up $50,000 for a hunk of carbon. So I should head to the jewelry store then, no?

    On the other hand, let's say I can buy a 25 unit apartment building for $1,000,000.00. Definitely a huge amount of money compared with my salary. Saving the funds is no doubt impractical, if not impossible. Can I afford 2x the minimum payment? Well, the minimum payment would be about $8000, so no, I could not afford double that.

    On the flip side, if the units rent for $600 apiece, I have inflows of $15,000 per month, minus expenses. Net net, we're probably looking at a positive cash flow on the building of approximately $3000/mo.

    You would have advised me never to purchase this building because I couldn't make 2x the minimum payment. In my opinion, your test is defective, because the building is a good purchase.

    Now we see that what you do with the money is way more important than the amount of money involved.

    Why does taking on debt to buy a home make sense? Because you have a housing payment anyway, and you might as well be building up equity and deducting the mortgage interest.

    Why does buying a car on credit make sense? Why would you want to have that much money tied up in a rapidly depreciating asset? Anyhow, you should buy a used car. New cars are a ripoff.

    Why does remodeling your home on a home equity loan make sense? Because you are investing in your property and increasing its value.

    Good Debt is for investment, when you expect a return on that investment that is much higher than the cost of funds. The only exception that I can think of to that rule is your primary residence, and that is for the reason that I gave above: you're making a housing payment anyway. Why not pay yourself?
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:You prove my point by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as truly "good" debt, IMHO. Debt is fundamentally bad by its very nature, and anyone who says otherwise is probably a loan officer. :-) In the end, some debt can yield you financial returns, but it comes with a risk that you really must weigh before deciding whether you take the plunge or not. That part is not a decision that can be made entirely by sitting down with the numbers. It's more a "comfort zone" question than anything else. Personally, I don't see going into debt to make money as a wise course of action. I'd much rather incorporate and not get as high a return on my lack of investment than put my own financial head through the noose....

      So answer me this, should I buy a $50,000 diamond ring for my wife on a jewelry-store consumer loan? After all, $50,000 is a huge amount of money proportional to my salary, the minimum payment on a consumer loan is typically 4% of principal, which would be $2000. I could afford double. And, yes, I think it's impractical to save up $50,000 for a hunk of carbon. So I should head to the jewelry store then, no?

      Depends on whether you really thing $50k is an appropriate amount of money to spend on a ring. That's a separate question entirely. I never said those were my only criteria for deciding whether to take out a loan. That said, if you can easily afford to spend $4,000 per month towards a ring for your wife, you're definitely way outside the realm of a typical consumer, for whom $4,000 is more than a month's salary before taking out taxes.... A normal consumer would be facing a question more along the lines of a $5k ring and a $400 monthly payment, in which case, they would feel somewhat pinched at $800, but they could do it. Thus, they might reasonably consider $5k to be an acceptable amount of money to spend on e.g. a wedding ring.

      Again, however, those would still not be the only criteria for making the decision. You'd still want to decide whether you have better uses for the money---saving up to buy a house, for example---and whether there are cheaper rings that your wife-to-be would consider acceptable. You'd obviously have to weigh a lot of other factors, and whether you can afford it is only one of those factors (and not the most important one by any means). My rules there are strictly for deciding whether you can really afford the loan, not whether the thing you are buying is a good (or even reasonable) deal at that price.

      On the other hand, let's say I can buy a 25 unit apartment building for $1,000,000.00. Definitely a huge amount of money compared with my salary. Saving the funds is no doubt impractical, if not impossible. Can I afford 2x the minimum payment? Well, the minimum payment would be about $8000, so no, I could not afford double that. On the flip side, if the units rent for $600 apiece, I have inflows of $15,000 per month, minus expenses. Net net, we're probably looking at a positive cash flow on the building of approximately $3000/mo. You would have advised me never to purchase this building because I couldn't make 2x the minimum payment. In my opinion, your test is defective, because the building is a good purchase.

      Again, my rules were not intended to say whether something was a good deal, only whether you could really afford it. As for whether I'd tell you to not purchase it, that depends on how solid you are financially and where the building is located. I very likely might have advised against it. I've seen a lot of people lose their shirts buying rental units like that. An apartment complex is a relatively high risk investment. All it takes is one month at less than half occupancy (well, 53%) and you're actively losing money, and that's not counting expenses.

      If you're in a city, you can probably bank on 85% occupancy averaged over a year in most areas, but you'll still have some seasonal swings, and if you can

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:You prove my point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New cars are a luxury. You're paying extra for a symbol of wealth. This isn't a ripoff, per-se... but know that a huge portion of the money is being spent on something that has nothing whatsoever to do with transportation.

    3. Re:You prove my point by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as truly "good" debt, IMHO. Debt is fundamentally bad by its very nature, and anyone who says otherwise is probably a loan officer.

      Well, I won't try to convince you otherwise because I know that I cannot, but as someone who is not a loan officer and believes that there is such a thing as truly good debt, I'd like to ask, where did your beliefs come from? Why are you so adamant that debt can never be good?

      A normal consumer would be facing a question more along the lines of a $5k ring and a $400 monthly payment, in which case, they would feel somewhat pinched at $800, but they could do it. Thus, they might reasonably consider $5k to be an acceptable amount of money to spend on e.g. a wedding ring.

      Well, add or subtract zeros as you feel appropriate; but my point (perhaps poorly made before) still remains. You even say that someone "might reasonably consider $5k to be an acceptable amount of money to spend on e.g. a wedding ring", and being a reasonable person, might consider that $5k debt to be good debt (I know, I know, there is no "truly good" debt, but in your framework, there seems to be a concept of "acceptable" debt... not "good" per se, but go for it nonetheless) :)

      Again, I am not making a value judgment about purchasing a $5k or even $50k ring. That is none of my business, and anyway, I cannot judge how much happiness that piece of fine jewelry would bring to someone other than me. My issue is with the financing of the purchase, not the purchase itself.

      My point, is that while you have said it is "reasonable" for a person to take on a $5k debt, assuming he could muster up $800 per month if he really, really had to, I would argue that this $5k engagement ring financing is a monumentally stupid move. I mean, literally deserving of a monument to be constructed right there in the jewelry store, for all to see and remember the gross idiocy this guy showed. That $5k loan is the epitome of bad debt. My apologies in advance to you if you were that "reasonable" guy in the jewelry store.

      The reason that the ring purchase is bad debt is that you expect a large negative return on investment (diamonds decline sharply in value post retail sale). You might counter that the investment is more than just a diamond, it is also a wife. Unfortunately, experience (not personal experience, of course) shows that a wife who insists that potential grooms spend 3 months' salary on a worthless rock (again, "financial worthlessness", not "personal happiness worthlessness"--if you've ever tried to sell a diamond, you will know why I use the term "worthless"), will without fail be an even larger negative return on investment.

      My personal experience is that, while I did purchase a diamond engagement ring for my wife, the ring cost approximately $500 in today's dollars. She still wears it proudly, despite the fact that we could easily replace it with something more expensive. To the extent that a human being can be given a "value", there is no ring or other token that can be had at any cost, that would be an accurate expression of how much I "value" my wife.

      Again, my rules were not intended to say whether something was a good deal, only whether you could really afford it.

      Well, I disagree that your rules even say whether or not a purchase is affordable.

      Your rules state that, because I can't make $16,000 payments each months, I cannot afford to purchase the building. I am a landlord, and you are wrong. I can afford it, and I would have zero difficulty getting it financed. This is based on experience. By the way, if you are aware of any properties that meet this description, please contact me. ;)

      You would also "very likely" counsel me not to purchase the building. I can understand why you would give that advice--you do not have any experience owning rental property, so you greatly overstate the risks involved.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:You prove my point by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      but if you lose your shirt because of negative cash flow for one month, then... well... you are not managing your business properly.

      Or you aren't managing your personal finances properly. That said, bear in mind that I'm from rural West Tennessee, and that's where the folks who lost their shirts were. Things are kind of different when the number of people looking for apartments doesn't increase much from year to year while new complexes are built every few years. With a population of 8,000 people and a transient population of 6,000 college students who go home for the summer (4500 of whom live in the dorms and another 1200 or so of whom live locally already, and many of whom live in frat houses), 25 apartments is a pretty big chunk of the total apartments in town... like maybe a fifth. That changes the dynamics significantly. Your income drying up completely for three months in a row also changes the dynamics significantly, depending on how close you're cutting it the rest of the year. You can't even use it as a hotel because there's no tourism or anything. Like I said, it depends on where the complex is located.

      Like I said, though, I wouldn't necessarily recommend against buying it. I'd probably recommend setting up a shell corporation to protect you from the liability and let it pay you a salary. That way, if things do go south, you won't lose your house.

      But man, do I ever hear people complaining about the trouble that they have with their new cars.

      People complain about cars. It's what we do. :-D

      No no no no. 1,000 times no. The car depreciating in value quickly does not imply that you should lease! When your car salesman tries to convince you of this, tell him to go engage in the act of coitus with himself. The rate of expected depreciation is already factored into your lease terms, so if your car depreciates rapidly, your residual value will be lower and your lease payments higher to reflect this. Please, please, understand your financial decisions before you make them.

      That depends largely on whether you will trade in the car at the end of that period anyway. Leasing is cheaper than buying if you would trade it in at the end of that time period anyway. (Source: leaseguide.com.)

      That said, I didn't word that too well when I said that was a good reason to consider leasing. The rate of depreciation is factored in, as you mention, but with a purchase, you are front-loading the trade-in value and getting it back at the end. That's money that you aren't making interest on. With a lease, you are effectively only paying the interest on that. If you take the money you save and invest it in something that pays a higher rate (tax-free muni bonds, for example), you're better off. Invest it in stocks and you might be dramatically better off (or much worse off, depending on your luck in stock picks).

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  121. Tell me more about banks with good interest rates. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    While I agree in principle with what you've said, could you tell me where to go to find a bank account that beats inflation? As far as I know, the only banks that provide that sort of interest rate are online-only establishments. My big national bank (Wachovia) only gives 0.55% on its savings accounts and only 3.43% on money market accounts... with nearly half a million dollars in them. All of my assets put together couldn't top 3% on their money market account scale, and CPI inflation was 3.8% last year.

    So far, I'm beating inflation only because of my mutual fund investments. I could transfer them all into a money market account but I'd lose a HUGE return on investment, so a bank account is just a way to lose money more slowly than by keeping it all in cash as far as I'm concerned.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  122. Cash discounts are NOT against the CC agreement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What credit card companies insist on is that credit card customers pay the advertised prices. They don't discuss fees or discounts for other methods of payment, they just want life to be simple for their customers.

  123. "What can I do?" by smithmc · · Score: 1


    You can take off your tinfoil hat and join the rest of us here in Realityland, that's what you can do.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    1. Re:"What can I do?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You can take off your tinfoil hat and join the rest of us here in Realityland, that's what you can do.

      Damn right. Be more pragmatic.

      When you take a stand on principle, don't gripe about the practical consequences.

  124. Higher Learning by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    I'm under the impression that much of cash-only society is not interested in high-profile activities such as university enrollment. By attending a university, one has the opportunity to learn and experience things one might not otherwise have to opportunity to learn. Participating in modern banking also opens many doors that are closed to the cash-only community.

    It seems that refusal to use banks in any way indicates that the OP is resistant to expanding his/her horizon.

  125. I don't think so by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Christ said multiple times he comes not to destroy the Word but to uphold it. I mean, it's wacky contradictions galore throughout the Bible but most Christian scholars don't think Christ did away with the Old Testament. Matthew 5:17 is the best example.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the rules clearly did change. Christians can eat pork, men don't need to be circumsized, etc. A lot depends on whether you're Catholic, Protestant, etc, though.

  126. Grow up? by kenh · · Score: 1

    My advice is to grow up, walk to the local convienience store, and for less than a $1 fee (in most cases) in addition to your $100 you can get a money order for $100, walk back to school and get on with your education.

    You may have a point, and you may even be right, but what do you gain by arguing with the people that determine where you will live next school year over such an (honestly) minor point? You have choosen to "live off the grid" (no banks, no credit cards, etc.), and this is why you are having a problem - you are trying to pick and choose the individual pieces of the system you like (campus housing, public university education, etc.), and ignore the ones you don't (the modern banking system), and you (apparently) run to slashdot when something doesn't go your way...

    If this is the first seemingly "bizzare" exchange with a large, government entity, consider yourself lucky - you will have many more before your body is recycled...

    --
    Ken
  127. Re:Tell me more about banks with good interest rat by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    While I agree in principle with what you've said, could you tell me where to go to find a bank account that beats inflation? As far as I know, the only banks that provide that sort of interest rate are online-only establishments.

    Not that I'm flush with cash, but I've had fewer problems with ING Direct than some people have with physical banks. My primary checking account is US Bank, though.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  128. $100 is a LARGE amount of cash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What planet are you from? I can spend more than that on a nice dinner for two. When my walking-around money drops below $100, I need more.

    I usually have less than $1000 in my pocket, but not always. Right this instant, it's... $527.05

  129. Cashier's check or money order by pyite69 · · Score: 1

    It sucks, but that is not an unreasonable request - though I would try to get them to reduce the fee by the cashier's check charge since I believe they are legally required to accept cash.

  130. Even if that weren't the case by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    The mortgage is still better over the long run because some of the money goes back to you, not to someone else. Let's suppose for example that you had the option of buying a place with a 30 year 8% fixed mortgage and the payments were going to be $800/month (about $110,000 for those wondering) or you were offered to rent a place for the same price with the rent fixed. Now let's say you live there for 10 years. At the end of the 10 years renting, all your money ($115,200) has gone to someone else. You've nothing to show for it. However at the end of 10 years of mortgage, you only owe $95,620 on your mortgage. So while most of your money went to someone else, some of it came back to you. Thus assuming your place didn't significantly decrease in value, you can get some money when you sell it.

    Of course the longer the time frame, the more true this is. So if you are moving around often then no buying may not be great, but if you stay in one place it is, even if you assume everything else to be equal.

    But of course as you pointed out everything else is NOT equal. Landlords will raise rent as inflation happens and/or as prices go up and allow them to. A fixed mortgage, well, fixed, the payments stay constant. Then of course there's the fact that property essentially never decreases in value over long time scales. So as long as you hold it for a good amount of time you will make money. Finally there's the whole tax deduction thing. Sure, when you are first paying a new mortgage it is much like rent is that almost all your money is going to someone else. However, you get to write all that interest off your taxes and that is nothing to sneeze at.

    While buying doesn't make sense in every case I really don't understand this attitude I often encounter online of "You are an idiot if you get a mortgage." No, not really. You just have to be willing to live in one spot for a good amount of time (5 years minimum is a good rule of thumb) and it is well worth it.

    When I first bought my house, it was kind of a pain since I really couldn't charge that much in rent compared to what I owe on the mortgage. Now, 5 years later, prices have gone up a decent bit and rent is quite a bit more. I find I am able to offer what is considered quite cheap rent and cover the half of the mortgage payment that I'd like. Nothing has chanced on how much I need to pay, rent has just gone up as a whole and thus I can raise mine too.

  131. Walgreens won't take em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walgreens does not accept postal money orders. Sorry folks, get a checking account.

  132. Re:Tell me more about banks with good interest rat by pclminion · · Score: 1

    I second that on ING Direct. It's not the top rate in the whole country, but I feel it's reliable, and it's giving 4.50% APY at the moment. Of course, when you throw taxes into the calculation, it's just barely scraping above the inflation rate.

  133. Google is your friend by jgoemat · · Score: 1
    http://www.ustreas.gov/education/faq/currency/lega l-tender.shtml

    Question I thought that United States currency was legal tender for all debts. Some businesses or governmental agencies say that they will only accept checks, money orders or credit cards as payment, and others will only accept currency notes in denominations of $20 or smaller. Isn't this illegal?

    Answer The pertinent portion of law that applies to your question is the Coinage Act of 1965, specifically Section 31 U.S.C. 5103, entitled "Legal tender," which states: "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues."

    This statute means that all United States money as identified above are a valid and legal offer of payment for debts when tendered to a creditor. There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services. Private businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether or not to accept cash unless there is a State law which says otherwise. For example, a bus line may prohibit payment of fares in pennies or dollar bills. In addition, movie theaters, convenience stores and gas stations may refuse to accept large denomination currency (usually notes above $20) as a matter of policy.
  134. Ripe for abuse? by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a prime chance for companies to create their own high fee, high interest cash alternatives and force people to pay with those. Sorry - can't pay at Walmart without an EvilWally card. Don't like that? Go shop somewhere else then. What, we already put all the other businesses out of business? Guess your just fscked then.

    Seems like any business that has a strong hold ovr their market could easily force people to pay in whatever means they want, with whatever strings they want to attach, and there isn't much consumers can do about it.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:Ripe for abuse? by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

      You load 16 tons and what do you get?
      Another day older and deeper in debt.
      St. Peter, don't you call me because I can't go.
      I owe my soul to the company store.


      They made laws against the company store decades ago, but stores still do some features like that with special offers and such, but overall, it does not benefit a store, even a huge one like Wal-Mart, to trap people into currency they can spend at only one place. Even if they have a strong hold over the market, it doesn't work. I read in one article, after searching for some info in another response, that MS is even having trouble with their token economy for Zune.

      Even in a case of a de facto and de jure like Microsoft, they haven't put everyone else out of business.

  135. I hate the IRS. by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Blah! I hope you aren't responsible for setting up the support lines there at the IRS. I've been having an issue and the online system doesn't tell me anything at all, the phone system keeps routing me to an automated system that also doesn't tell me anything (and every number I've tried where I followed the prompts eventually gets me to that same system), and when I cheated and pressed the wrong numbers to get to a real person they refussed to help me because I couldn't answer the security questions which are evidently from the tax paperwork submitted, not by me - which is why I'm trying to find out what someone else submitted and if I'm going to get my refund or if they got my refund, so that there is no possible way for me to answer the questions. The real person on the phone couldn't even direct me to a fruad line or tell me if going to an IRS office in person will allow me to prove my identity.

    I'm tempted to just correct the situation by not paying my taxes next year. Maybe then someone would contact me. Maybe I can just deny that I'm me since obviously they have someone else pretending to be me. Maybe that person can get stuck paying my taxes.

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    1. Re:I hate the IRS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably an illegal alien using your social security number.

  136. Perfectly legal by dacarr · · Score: 1
    This is perfectly legal, and I'll tell you why.

    In short, cash is exceedingly hard to trace. Yes, even with receipts. Receipts can be forged, deposits can be fudged, and cash can "just vanish without a trace". And forget about asking where George is, that's just an experiment.

    So, that said, the university has to take a means that reduces lossage. Take certifiable or tractable funds. You know, checks, credit cards, money orders, cashiers checks, that sort of thing.

    Word of advice: get a checking account, or look into options like MIO or ADP. If you really don't like banks, find a good credit union.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  137. Lease vs. rent equation by davidwr · · Score: 1

    The lease vs. buy equation for a house is similar to anything else.

    How long do you plan to own it?
    What is the net present value of all of your expenses if you lease or rent for that period of time?
    What is the net present value of all your expenses if you buy then sell at the end of the time period?

    Since there are a variety of different mortgage plans out there, you should really be comparing each mortgage plan as well as the best rental option.

    Use a range of realistic estimates for time period, costs, resale value, and the interest rate used in calculating the net present value. You will find it's either a no-brainer to rent, a no-brainer to buy, or the decision is within the range of uncertainty of your estimates.

    In some cities, it may be cheaper to buy than rent on the high-end and cheaper to rent than buy on the low-end of the market, and in other cities it may be the other way around.

    Oh, don't forget quality of life issues. Most people pick a neighborhood before they pick a house. The neighborhood may be almost all sale-only or almost all rental, which sort of moots the entire exercise.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  138. ITS A TRAP by davidwr · · Score: 1

    We are his psych 101 study in human behavior.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  139. intrinsic value by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Gold and silver both have intrinsic value. They both make decent teeth fillings and gold is better than copper in electronics. If aesthetic value is intrinsic, both have value in jewelry-making.

    Unfortunately, they cost more than their intrinsic value.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  140. Fed reserve? Never. Linden labs: You bet! by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Too bad the local Kwik-E-Mart doesn't take Linden Dollars.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  141. How to accept cash safely by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Set up a system where I, the landlord, stamp all currency with "for deposit only, ACME Apartments, ACME Acres Bank." The ink is indelible and traceable to me. Just to make things very clear to anyone that thought they could remove the ink, I would punch a hole in the portrait.

    At this point, the currency becomes void for anything other than depositing in my bank. In effect, it becomes a check marked "for deposit only."

    For this privilege, I pay the bank a fee to cover their costs of buying new bills from the Federal Reserve and their costs of handling the transaction, plus a small profit for the bank.

    Sure, as a landlord instead of paying well under $1 to deposit a $1000 check, I might pay several dollars to deposit a stack of $20s, but at least I don't have to worry about getting robbed.

    If I ran a high-cash-volume business like a bar or casino I'd probably sign up for this service in a heartbeat.

    Right now this is illegal, but if it became legal universities, landlords, and the like could easily accept cash.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  142. Money orders suck. by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

    Money orders cost money. The fee is under a dollar if you get it from the right place (like a grocery store), but it can be several dollars if you get it from the wrong place (my bank charges $4 for money orders, $8 for cashier's checks). And then there's the inconvenience of traveling to the store to get one, and the fact that you can only get them in amounts up to $500.

    Checking accounts, however, are free from all the major banks. You can deposit, withdraw, and transfer money without paying anyone a dime. You do have to buy a box of checks if you want to write a check, but (1) you get a handful of starter checks for free, and (2) instead of writing checks, you can just use your free debit card to pay anyone who accepts Visa/MC.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  143. Laws of tender... by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 1

    I believe the federal law in cases like this states that once a transaction begins the merchant is required to accept any form of legal tender not excluded PRIOR to the beginning of the transaction.

    What does that mean? It means that if you walk into starbucks and order a latte and want to pay for your $10 coffee with a $100 bill they have to take it UNLESS they told you BEFORE beginning the transaction that they don't take $100 bills (usually via a tiny sign on the register saying "Nothing bigger than a $20")

    IANAL, and this is something that we covered very briefly in a law class back in freshman year, so someone with better credentials than 6 credits 7 years ago should probably verify this :)

    --
    /~mikeg
  144. how about, grow the fuck up? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " I don't trust the banks, "

    Jesus Christ, why? hmm? they going to steal your money? hmmm no. Are they going to report you? No.

    In fact you are far more likely to be watched when somneone finds out you only deal in 'cash' anyways.

    How are you planning to pay taxes?

    Still not convinced? spend 29 cents and get a fucking money order you idiot. You are going to college, please start to THINK.

    Here is another clue:
    ASk a lawyer for advice, not slashdot.

    Wait, there is more...
    is your beef with them not telling you? fine, go up the chain of command. If you haven't talked to the dean, you haven't finished yet, no mattter what some peon says.

    Or maybe you can just be for money instead of get an education.

    Oh, don't forget the best thing you can do at any colleg is make contacts, so be sure to work on your social skill they will get you farther in the long run.

    Yes, I know the irony of suggesting social skills after calling you names. See what happens when you don't learn them?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  145. How about you learn to read? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    He didn't say you can't do anything with cash, he suggested the two things you can do with cash that solves this whiners problem.

    Sure you can pay your bills with cash, but don't complain to slashdot about having to drive to the gas company/ electric company/ water. etc...

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  146. 2 things you can do by guruevi · · Score: 1

    a) go to a bank (most offer free checking accounts) and drop in your money, then pay the university
    b) go to a postal office or bank and buy a money order for the amount you owe, a small fee might be added for handling though

    I mean, that's really a no-brainer. The government is the only entity that has to accept your tender by law, any business can choose not to do business with you for one or another reason, be that your choice of tender (the university, your landlord) or the way you smell (restaurants for example). Legal tender or forced tender is payment that, by law, cannot be refused in settlement of a debt denominated in the same currency. That means that if you want to pay off the university later on (after you did business with them) they cannot refuse your payment in the same currency, that does not mean they cannot refuse the form of payment (truckload of pennies).

    There is no federal law prohibiting private businesses, persons or organizations from specifying other methods of payment they choose to accept or refuse, such entitites therefore are free to insist on payment in private currency, for example, or to refuse larger denomination banknotes

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  147. Some advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a place as soon as you can. Unless your wages are good, owning a home may not be an option at all for you in a few years time. The populations of most western countries are going to keep rising throughout those boomers' retirement, and the much of the next generation will never own a home.

    House prices where I live have risen so much in the last two years that my $500,000 home is now worth $800,000. I'd never be able to buy this place if I were looking today. I'd never be able to rent this place either- there is no rent control here (welcome to Alberta).

    Don't forget to use floss and sunscreen, but those aren't quite as important.

  148. To summarize by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    After reading most of the comments below, I will summarize for you, Sparky:

    1) Money orders are cheap and have a paper trail
    2) Universities don't have top notch people to file away cash
    3) You really want to keep a big wad of cash under you dorm bed?
    4) You WILL need credit in the future, like it or not
    5) Banks are federally monitored. My wife works for a bank, I know. If you don't trust banks, don't even bother trusting the government.
    6) Use a debit card- paper trail but no interest
    7) Don't post stupid questions on the Internet when you could just ask a few friends or family.
    8) Large cash exchanges will have to be disputed in court. A debit/credit card dispute is generally easier and more favorable for you to go through.
    9) Get mugged lately?
    10) Pre-paid debit cards that are not personally traceable.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  149. Money order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to the post office and get a money order.

  150. Nothing wrong with being able to mail a check by mi · · Score: 1

    Because writing a check and mailing it to the recipient just is not the way that money transfers are done in the 21st century, and it's obviously very clumsy.

    There are other ways of sending payments — including by phone and by Internet.

    In the rest of the modern world it stopped to be the way in maybe the 80s.

    So, in addition to all these other methods, America's system still supports check-writing. Nothing wrong with having additional options, in my opinion.

    And if there is a particular method, that's not in use in the States (like by using your GSM-phone), the ability to use checks is not to blame for that...

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  151. We don't take cash... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    I take care of the summer reservations for a small beach resort. We don't take cash - If people want to pay cash I tell them to take it to the post office and get a money order and give me that. We're always booked solid, so if someone walks away because of our policy I just move to the next person on my waiting list. Why don't we take cash? Because reservations are handled in Vancouver and the deposits are done at a credit union on Vancouver Island. It's too much of a hassle to ship the cash to the final point, or set up a transfer for a thousand-dollar payment.

  152. Look up Legal Tender Laws or Read the Bills by trout007 · · Score: 1

    Right on the bill it says This note is legal tender for all debts public and private. The key word here is debt. If you go into debt to someone by the legal tender laws they have to take the cash or coins or they forfeit the debt. This doesn't include transactions where you are paying immediatly for a service becuase you are essentially making a deal where I give you this for that and the store can set limits on it. Now if you ran a debt tab at a bar or store and you owed them money they cannot refuse your payment in any legal tender.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  153. Read the bill... by JSC · · Score: 1

    On US Currency, is says "THIS NOTE IS LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE".

    However, according to the U.S. Treasury, "There is, however, no Federal statute mandating that a private business, a person or an organization must accept currency or coins as for payment for goods and/or services."

    --
    Time's fun when you're having flies. - Kermit the Frog