Slashdot Mirror


AT&T Vs. Apple Store At the iPhone Launch

MBCook tips an article at Gizmodo that begins with a reader's experiences trying to buy an iPhone yesterday at an AT&T store and an Apple store. Many, but not all, of the comments on the post echo this reader's experience: Apple good, AT&T bad. "Day one revealed what all Apple aficionados fear. That AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone."

375 comments

  1. Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by adam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Honestly, I don't know WHAT THE F happened. Jobs himself said when announcing the iphone release date that those wishing to buy it should "go to an AT&T store.." there were questions about whether Apple would sell it at all on launch date. Then in the days before the release, I saw a lot of talk on the 'net about people lining up at Apple stores, and ZERO people lining up at AT&T.

    As some who saw my posts 3 days ago may have noted, i was very excited for the release of the iphone, and i bought four of them. However, this was GROSSLY mishandled by Apple not making it patently clear that Jobs had misspoke (or whatever) earlier. My plan to go to the AT&T owned local store was thwarted when one of our guys went down there (I was in meetings all day) check the line, then reported to me that he was told the store didn't have ANY iPhones at all, but was giving out "vouchers."

    By this time the local Apple store was a madhouse. I'd dropped in around noon on my way to a meeting, and it had around 150 people in line (this is a not-so-very-well-known one, inside a crappy mall). By the time I got out of meetings and adjusted the buying plan, it was almost 8. The store ran out with around 200 people still ahead of me in line.

    I got up this morning at 8am, and went to the store when it opened. I was the 42nd through the door, and bought 4 of the remaining 18 4GB phones (the 8GBs were all gone). Everyone behind me in line was told a shipment would arrive "later today sometime" and they could wait. No one got out of line and left.

    Now that I have the iPhone, i'm as impressed as I hoped i'd be (and glad I bought three more for my colleagues), although it certainly could use some minor software updates (minor tweaks to the UI.. adding of buttons, landscape mode for the keyboard in other than Safari, etc).. but the pinch/stretch zoom, animations, etc are all phenomenal. The phone is very impressive, but does give a few feels of "beta," and the fact that some of the software even between our 4 phones is different suggests to the phones are still "development build" and several major revisions will be pushed through itunes software updates.

    Overall, I am very pleased with the phone.. and less than pleased with Apple's management of the whole thing (I mean, it's their reputation here.. not AT&T's.. if anything I feel bad for AT&T, as it seems they may have been screwed out of phones originally due them so that the Apple stores could garner some publicity)

    I will also say that the Apple store employees were applauding for us as we entered the store this morning. Really people.. APPLAUSE? WTF. It's a fricking phone, I'm not shaving my head for charity or doing something noble... I'm an American jackass spending $2k on phones because they can play H.264, have a nice UI, and won't crash, LOL. Also, for what it's worth, T-mobile has had my monthly payments for 3yrs now, and I *NEVER* have service (and I live in a major, populated, affluent part of Los Angeles). My treo/blackberry constantly say "no service" in my house. Today I have 5bars on my iPhone. Now, maybe this is just luck of the draw, and i'll have crappy reception in place that t-mobile rocked, but so far, I have zero regrets.

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Fahrenheit+450 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, I too found the applause silly, but there were plenty of customers there that were getting into it, high fiving the staff on the way out the door and all.
      Plus it helps build a festival atmosphere, which looks good for the reporters that are going to be there -- it just adds to the buzz for the next big release.

      I just want to go in and to my business without the annoying hooplah, but I understand why they did it.

      --
      -30-
    2. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Davak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my description of the reported errors has been on digg and everywhere else. Feel free to share your horror stories:

      http://blogs.tech-recipes.com/davak/2007/06/29/mul tiple-iphone-activation-errors/

      /Still waiting for my activation.

    3. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Keep reading there jackass, the very next line reads:

      Now that I have the iPhone, i'm as impressed as I hoped i'd be (and glad I bought three more for my colleagues), although it certainly could use some minor software updates (minor tweaks to the UI.. adding of buttons, landscape mode for the keyboard in other than Safari, etc)...
    4. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by famicommie · · Score: 3, Informative

      I feel especially bad for the people who waited in line for hours, only to have their iPhone be useless for several more hours as they waited for it to activate.

    5. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but there were plenty of customers there that were getting into it, high fiving the staff on the way out the door and all.
      That's way beyond pathetic.
    6. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I feel especially bad for the people who waited in line for hours, only to have some jerk in front of them buy up the last 4.

    7. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't. If the store was allowing people to buy four of them, which they obviously were, to hell with you. It's a god damn phone, waiting a few days to get it isn't going to kill you.

    8. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by bakura121 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I bought mine at the Tyson's Corner (VA) Apple Store. They did the applauding and high-fiving there too. At first I thought it was a little bit cheesy, but it was FUN and it got everyone in a good mood. The staff at that store really (appear to) enjoy working there. Their excitement is contageous and gets the customer excited about being there. You just don't get that at other computer or phone stores. That's why I keep going back there.

    9. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm an American jackass spending $2k on phones because they can play H.264, have a nice UI, and won't crash, LOL.

      Correction: you are an american jackass buying an apple 1.0 (meaning: it's unstable, as most apple 1.0 hardware/software).
      People are already having problems with their mail program crashing.

      You are an american jackass buying a beautiful, lusty phone, but that doesn't have lots of standard features people expect on phones, such as:

      • No filesystem access: which means you can't download stuff with the browser, no attaching files in mail
      • No flash or java in safari
      • Crippled bluetooth: not even file transfer
      • You can't use the phone as a modem
      • No usb mass storage support


      And even some of the features are badly implemented:

      • No copy and paste
      • No landscape mode outside safari
      • No junk mail filter
      • No IM
      • No GPS, a bummer on google maps


      I am glad the phone won't be available ever in Venezuela. It is a pretty phone, the UI is mostly great, you have a great browser, but they could have made the phone better.
    10. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by LaurieDash · · Score: 1
      According to the BBC you could only buy two?

      She plans to give the second handset - Apple will let each customer buy only two - to her sister.

    11. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by sdnoob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >> Apple store employees were applauding for us as we entered the store this morning. Really people.. APPLAUSE? WTF. It's a fricking phone,

      they were applauding because you're...

      >> ...spending $2k on [four] phones

      first, we have the early adopters that always pay a premium for what they want..
      then there's the apple customers that always pay a premium for what they buy..

      add the two together and you wonder why the employees of the company that just soaked you for 2 grand are applauding for.. you just paid one of their paychecks for the month!

      $500-$600 (PLUS a two year contract! from, ahem, at&t..) for a friggin phone? no thanks. i'll take my freebies any day (have paid a total of $50 for the four phones i've had, dating back to the old analog "bricks"; those old phones still have all these fancy new ones beat as far as range goes)... a phone is a phone, that's all I need.

    12. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am glad the phone won't be available ever in Venezuela.

      Me too. If they ever got popular, Hugo would just nationalize all the Apple Stores.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    13. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "go to an AT&T store" was just a buzz-building maneuver. The entire quote, in context, was something like (I'm paraphrasing), "If you want to get an iPhone, you should go to an AT&T store. A lot of people are going to go to the Apple stores because they don't realize they're also for sale at AT&T stores, so if you go to an AT&T store, you'll have a better chance of getting one." That's just an attempt at a self-fulfilling prophecy (for vast lines at Apple)--and evidently, it worked. There were also vast lines at some AT&T stores, of course--Steve made the remark hoping to equally overflow BOTH outlets.

      Apple's reputation is also more compatible with the "line up, stay overnight in line, and be on the news when the store opens" hoopla than AT&T's reputation is. By the way, the AT&T stores in Spokane, WA were indeed selling actual iPhones, although the AT&T kiosk in Moscow, ID was selling the vouchers.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    14. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by DaleGlass · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's the rush?

      I don't get the point of standing in a huge queue for something. Wait a couple of weeks and you'll be able to just walk into the shop and buy it without waiting, plus you get to find out whether the first version is worth buying at all.

    15. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That's why I keep going back there."

      The secret to good customer service is...hire fanboys. :)

    16. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by bakura121 · · Score: 1

      "The secret to good customer service is...hire fanboys. :)" I guess you could classify anyone passionate about their job as 'fanboys' of their particular product. Whatever... it works well for Apple Store.

    17. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by dave562 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The rush is all about the 0-day newness factor. Everyone who I spoke with who absolutely "had to have" an iPhone is some whiney, emo, scenester hipster. I work at an art museum. I live in southern California. I am absolutely submerged in the target audience for the iPhone. Everyone who I have spoken with looks at me like I'm crazy when I tell them that I don't want an iPhone, that I think it's over priced, that I think AT&T service sucks (which it does, my Blackberry 8800 through work is on AT&T), and that it is lacking some pretty key features (enterprise email, modem, etc).

      I'm going out tonight, and I know that I'm going to run into at least one person with a crowd of people around them because they are showing off their spiffy new iPhone. The iPhone is like the Tickle Me Elmo doll for the 20+, need to be perceived as tuned in and cool with the cutting edge segment of society.

    18. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      And which phone in Venezuela has all these features? This is not mocking; I am genuinely curious.

    19. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Rebelgecko · · Score: 1

      People are already having problems with their mail program crashing.
      Just wondering, how does the review you linked to show a major problem with Mail? Personally, I think its a great feature if 1/2 times Mail crashes the user doesn't even notice. On the other hand, one user having one noticeable "crash" isn't a very good sample size.
      No filesystem access: which means you can't download stuff with the browser, no attaching files in mail
      You're half right. But seriously, did you even read your own link? About 3/4 of the way down Gruber writes, "The only way to send a photo is to email it." I'm assuming if you can email a picture it would have to be an attachment, thereby making attachments available. I really can't think of anything else on your filesystem you would want to email anyways, with the possible exception of your music or videos, which you could *gasp* email from your regular computer!
      You are right in saying there is no instant messaging client but you can easily work around this by having AIM forward your text messages to your iPhone via SMS.

      --
      CATS/Diebold '08- All your vote are belong to us!
    20. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Grimbleton · · Score: 0

      Oh really? I still haven't been able to get my Wii, and I refuse to pay $350-400 to a scalper for one. The only way I could get one in the town I live in? Camp. With a dozen other people who will be there trying to get one too

    21. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by tftp · · Score: 1

      It would be probably unwise to allow the very first customer to buy the entire stock so that he can resell it just outside the store.

    22. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by 3263827 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Obviously you have no clue...

      No Landscape mode outside of Safari? How about Landscape with youtube, with movies, with TV shows, with music, with photos? Guess there's no landscape mode outside of Safari.

      Say Hi to Hugo, and enjoy your freely elected dictator.

    23. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You are an american jackass buying a beautiful, lusty phone, but that doesn't have lots of standard features people expect on phones, such as:

      I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist in this reply - in fact we're going to compare to my company issued 7130e Blackberry from Verizon...

      • No filesystem access: which means you can't download stuff with the browser, no attaching files in mail
      • No flash or java in safari
      • Crippled bluetooth: not even file transfer
      • You can't use the phone as a modem
      • No usb mass storage support
      • While I can save pictures to my BB (wow - pretty backgrounds!) there's not much else I can do with it.
      • My BB runs on Java, but I've yet to see any java/flash content work. In fact browsing is pretty shitty on my 7130e.
      • Ditto on the bluetooth: There's no file transfer on Verizon Blackberry phones - or at least on my 7130e. :(
      • I can use my phone as a modem, if my company would pay for that feature.
      • Pretty sure my BB doesn't do this either.

      And yet Blackberries are quite standard in the corporate world simply because they can integrate with Exchange. Honestly, I hate mine.

      And even some of the features are badly implemented:

      • No copy and paste
      • No landscape mode outside safari
      • No junk mail filter
      • No IM
      • No GPS, a bummer on google maps

      Your first two points are valid, but the junk mail filters I've setup in Outlook do not work for my Blackberry - despite that expensive piece of software sitting on our server (Blackberry Enterprise Server). For the IM comment, I don't use that on my phone anyway. I hate "texting". I won't even send an email from my BB unless I have to. As for your last point, I will agree that with so many phones including GPS these days that it should start to become standard. However, that's yet another feature my 7130e seems to not have. I've found an option to enable GPS services, yet it has had no effect on anything I use - including Google Maps for Blackberry.

    24. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by JQuick · · Score: 1

      I believe the OP meant that the qwerty keyboard is only available in landscape mode for Safari. One cannot, for instance use the wider landscape mode for keyboard input for Mail, etc. at this point.

      I am not concerned by this. It is obvious that there will be many software releases in iPhone's future even for these 1.0 devices. If it is a big deal for many people, it can be fixed in the field.

    25. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it can make and receive calls, and send and receive SMS, I am more than happy.

    26. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1

      And which phone in Venezuela has all these features? This is not mocking; I am genuinely curious.
      Treo?
      That fancy new PDA phone by motorola?
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
    27. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a phone is a phone, that's all I need. And I'm sure that makes you very superior.
    28. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Amouth · · Score: 1

      don't you guys get the iMate stuff there too? if so bank there you go.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    29. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's funny. I thought there was a limit of two iPhones per person. Hmmmm?

    30. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by stuktongue · · Score: 1

      In terms of the guy with an audience, I was that guy at my neighborhood Bob's Big Boy... and it was a fun time had by all.

    31. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. Who would want to tell their grandchildren that they stood in line to buy the first iPhone at an AT&T store.

    32. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by ksheff · · Score: 1

      not being able to use the phone as a modem would be the only think that I wouldn't like. But my existing phone doesn't let me do that anyway, so it's not like iPhone is the only device that doesn't let you do that.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    33. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      for what it's worth, T-mobile has had my monthly payments for 3yrs now, and I *NEVER* have service (and I live in a major, populated, affluent part of Los Angeles). My treo/blackberry constantly say "no service" in my house. Today I have 5bars on my iPhone. Now, maybe this is just luck of the draw It's luck of the draw. My wife has T-Mobile and gets five bars everywhere in our new house. I have Cingular/AT&T and I have to stand on the sidewalk holding a coat hanger up in the air to check my voicemail. We live in Santa Monica.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    34. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to be an Apple apologist in this reply - in fact we're going to compare to my company issued 7130e Blackberry from Verizon... A stupid email toy like the BlackBerry isn't anywhere near the same class as a PDA/Smartphone. You might as well be comparing the iPhone to a pocket calculator. When you start comparing the iPhone to phones in its own class, those shortcomings are glaring.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    35. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      You are right in saying there is no instant messaging client but you can easily work around this by having AIM forward your text messages to your iPhone via SMS.

      IMing via SMS? Yeah, THAT sounds cheap. Not! :)

      Seriously, I'll stick with my Treo that does everything I need my phone to do and can do everything that the iPod can do. Yes, your UI is different. If that's important to you, enjoy the Apple lock-in. Personally, I prefer my solid Palm-based Treo for which thousands of add-on applications exist. And if I want one that doesn't exist, I can (and have) written my own. But I can listen to MP3s, play movies, take pictures, edit/view Word and Excel documents, view PDFs (I have a library of PDF references on my SD card in my Treo), browse the web, send and receive email, download files from the web to a file system... and it works, and has for years.

      I'm glad Apple fans are excited by their new phone, but I really don't see what all the hype is about. Apple has a phone. Big deal.

    36. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      I had a Tmobile phone for awhile. That was essentially a temporary phone when I was first moving back to the U.S. During that time I had enough of an opportunity to realize the coverage sucked. So I switched to Cingular (now AT&T I guess) and have had *awesome* reception and coverage ever since. I think the only place I've ever noticed not having coverage was in some vineyard foothills of Northern California, but I'll bet TMobile didn't have coverage there either. I also haven't had a problem with Cingular customer service. I've had to wait on hold a few times when I wanted to make changes to the service, but they were polite and got the job done once they answered.

      I've personally had no complaints with Cingular's service or support. YMMV.

    37. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by galimore · · Score: 1

      Dude... you bought 4 phones. You have no right to complain.

      I stood in line for 2 hours in 102 degree weather yesterday... and guess what? My phone still isn't activated. It's been over 24 hours.

      By the way, the Apple store I bought my phone from was extremely professional. They brought us all free bottles of cold water and asked us to keep an eye out for anyone suffering from heat exhaustion. They checked on us several times all the way up until the opening of the store.

      So fine, the Apple stores were a madhouse, but have you seen the reviews of how the AT&T stores are dealing with customers? I'm glad Apple decided to sell the phones - they handled it very well... now if AT&T would get their act together life would be swell. ;)

    38. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Wellington+Grey · · Score: 1

      I am glad the phone won't be available ever in Venezuela.


      Yes, because the best kind of options are no options.

      -Grey
    39. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by galimore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can think of two very specific situations it reminds me of:

      1) Going to the first showing of some outrageously popular film such as Lord of the Rings or Star Wars. Personally I can't stand the people who cheer at those events, and want to beat them within an inch of their lives.

      2) Going to an amazing concert being performed by your favorite band.

      Now... If you're standing in line for the first day of the launch of a product that is obviously going to be popular, such as the iPhone, you've got to expect the people there to be slightly zealot-bound, no? Everybody in my line was extremely cool about it. People were amicable and generally chatty considering the 102 degree weather and uncertainty about the phone's supply.

      The fact that Apple employees were cheering people on the way in (in my case) indicated to us that there were still phones available (duh) so, as you got closer to the front of the line, and while you were entering and being cheered it was because you were extremely likely to get a phone.

      That said, I liken yesterday more to the latter - going to your favorite concert. I'd much rather have the people around me cheering than spilling a beer on me.

      Now if AT&T would activate my phone. It's only been about 27 hours. *grumble*

    40. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but you can buy the Blackberry 7130e for $99 - ok, $200 if you don't get an $80/month plan, but that's still slightly less expensive as the iPhone.

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    41. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      A stupid email toy like the BlackBerry isn't anywhere near the same class as a PDA/Smartphone. You might as well be comparing the iPhone to a pocket calculator. When you start comparing the iPhone to phones in its own class, those shortcomings are glaring.

      Let's visit the definition of a Smartphone shall we?

      "Smart" functionality includes any additional interface including a miniature QWERTY keyboard, a touch screen, or even just secure access to company mail, such as is provided by a BlackBerry. [Emphasis mine.]

      What's that you say? A Blackberry is considered a Smartphone. As is the iPhone. There is a wide range of capabilities in the Smartphone category to be sure. Not all phones have every feature possible. And a Blackberry is more than an email toy. I have google maps (not the web page, a google written installable app) installed on my blackberry. I *could* install Yahoo IM on it if I chose to (but I don't). There's a whole slew of 3rd party apps for Blackberries.

    42. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by shmlco · · Score: 1

      And I wandered out of the Apple store, went across the street to a local WiFi-enabled restaurant, plugged the phone into my notebook, and was enabled in three minutes.

      Now, I may have beat the rush, or the operation was simpler (already had an AT&T phone) vs. a phone number transfer from another service, but I suspect AT&T's systems were simply overwhelmed, much like TicketMaster going down when XYZ announces tickets now on sale in ABC-land.

      Be interesting to hear the stats at some point, but from what I've gathered at sites across the web more people had my experience than yours. Sorry, and hope you're up by now.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    43. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      I didn't comment on the iPhone's price. We were talking Smartphone features. I think $300 would be plenty for the iPhone. Apple thinks otherwise.

    44. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by arivanov · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, so?

      If you think that it has become usefull after that think twice. Have you ever dealt with a mobile operator customer care or sales on a predominantly data product?

      I am tempted to post some of the great gems I have received from Vodafone, O2 and the like in responce to trivial queries regarding data tariffs and billing. What Apple afficionados do not realise is that with this cool new gadget they are going to jump straight into the great quagmire of extreme incompetence that is the data side of the mobile industry. Compared to mobile data support the likes of NTL or AOL are stellar examples of customer service.

      So the minor noises from people slightly dissatisfied now will be replaced with screams of horror later on. Apple's fans are spoilt to have products that usually perform as advertised. When they meet the reality of general purpose mobile data which works only occasionally and never works when you really need it, they are going to scream. Loud. Very loud.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    45. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The proprietary country of Venezuela is such a shithole I almost feel sorry for you.

    46. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I too found the applause silly, but there were plenty of customers there that were getting into it, high fiving the staff on the way out the door and all.
      Plus it helps build a festival atmosphere, which looks good for the reporters that are going to be there -- it just adds to the buzz for the next big release. That goes way beyond silly. This is fuckin' cult behavior. Scientology does shit like this. Amway does shit like this. Apple Inc should be better than this.
    47. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by rtechie · · Score: 1

      But you compared a $99 phone to a $600 phone without marking price as a point in the Blackberry's favor. Browsing and media are better on th iPhone (so I'm told, I haven't used it) but email is better on the Blackberry. Blackberry's ARE basically mobile Exchange clients, and that's not a bad thing.

    48. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will also say that the Apple store employees were applauding for us as we entered the store this morning. Really people.. APPLAUSE? WTF. It's a fricking phone, I'm not shaving my head for charity or doing something noble... I'm an American jackass spending $2k on phones because they can play H.264, have a nice UI, and won't crash, LOL.


      Right on! You said it, bro.

    49. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, for what it's worth, T-mobile has had my monthly payments for 3yrs now, and I *NEVER* have service (and I live in a major, populated, affluent part of Los Angeles). Then who is the stupid? :)

    50. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      Hell - at my store in Emeryville, I got a bear hug. Of course it was from a neighbor in my loft-complex but she was getting a kick out of the scene. Hell if 50% of the customers think it's fun, and the employees are also getting a kick out of it, what the hell.

    51. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by tsa · · Score: 1

      Wow it's even worse than I thought! I hope they skip this first iPhone altogether for Europe and release the second version here. Meanwhile, I think the Nokia n95 is a fantastic little machine.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    52. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by CleverBoy · · Score: 1

      It's very clear Apple contacted a number of these "news" outlets, saying that Jobs was "misquoted". At one point, they had to give this up though, or else "misquote" would become a PR story in and of itself. So, catch-22. A number of "stubborn" sites didn't take the "news" down however, others like MacNN and AppleInsider either deleted or retracted the story. Decide what you will, Apple did a STELLAR job, and as soon as people found out activations could be handled through iTunes, the answer should have been clear. Well-stocked, no-hassle, CHURN em OUT mentality. The Apple store had my head spinning on how quickly I could get out of there and head home.

    53. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by janrinok · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't make him or her inferior either.

      --
      Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
    54. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by LaurieDash · · Score: 1

      I know. My point was that the parent (which was on +5 insightful i think) had claimed he'd bought 4.

    55. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by cswiger · · Score: 1

      So, let's consider the costs for a BB and an iPhone over one and two years, going with your #'s:

      For one year:
      BB: 12 months * $80/month plan + 99 = $1059
      iPhone: 12 * 80 + 599 = $1559
      Result: BB costs 2/3rds as much as an iPhone

      For two years:
      BB: 24 months * $80/month plan + 99 = $2059
      iPhone: 24 * 80 + 599 = $2559
      Result: BB costs 4/5ths as much as an iPhone

      What this comes down to is, would you choose to pay an extra 25% over the cost of a BB to have an iPhone instead?

      --
      "The human race's favorite method for being in control of the facts is to ignore them." -Celia Green
    56. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Brickwall · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh, really, please blow it out your rectum. I remember buying my first Honda Civic in 1975 - every time I passed another one on the street, BOTH of us would honk horns and wave with big silly grins on our faces.

      Our society lacks enthusiasm in just about every area. Ennui rules, which is one reason why drug use continues to rise. I'd rather see people get pumped up over a new technology that just may make their lives easier and less stressful, and I'd rather see employees who actually are excited about their products than the completely bored losers slowly ambling towards me with my Big Mac and fries when I have a 30-minute lunch hour.

      Why do you think Toyota is taking over as the world's biggest carmaker? Do you think maybe singing the company song each morning and doing some basic exercises to pump up employees makes a tiny bit of difference compared to the listless, overweight UAW workers slouching into GM plants?

      I've worked at companies where the employees were enthusiastic, and we did great things. I've worked at companies where employees couldn't care less, and most of them are out of business.

      Killjoy.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    57. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I went to one of the other Apple stores on Saturday morning here on east cost. They were actually offering free shagging - but no luck for the ladies - it was only for gentlemen.

      Now one lady got really mad. According to her, she too was an Apple fanboy. This did not fly with the geniuses that Apple employs. They quickly replied that technically, she can not be an Apple fan'boy' - because 'boy' signifies the male gender, and because she was 'she', she can not be an Apple fan'boy'. And if you were not an Apple fanboy, they were not offering shagging. Several people agreed to that point of view.

      It was such a simple and clear matter. How somebody can get offended by this is beyond me.

      BTW, if you buy four iPhones there, they were offering free anal (and you can choose to be either performing or performed, YAY!). Just in case, you know, if anybody here is interested...

    58. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spending $2k on phones because they can play H.264, have a nice UI, and won't crash

      You should've bought a Sony Ericsson walkman phone instead (like the W880) if that's what you wanted. Way cheaper as well.

    59. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By chance was that store in Massachusetts? Or maybe was that Virginia?

    60. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Jon+A.+Mbeki,+Esq. · · Score: 1
    61. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by osssmkatz · · Score: 1

      it does have file transfer via bluetooth. also, you can e-mail yourself files.. so no big deal.

    62. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Why do you think Toyota is taking over as the world's biggest carmaker? Do you think maybe singing the company song each morning and doing some basic exercises to pump up employees makes a tiny bit of difference compared to the listless, overweight UAW workers slouching into GM plants?
      I think it's more to do with their incredibly efficient production and superior cars. The shop-floor workers don't make much of a difference in a place that's pretty much entirely automated, and shutting the machines down to sing a song doesn't make more cars.
    63. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Perhaps if you compared a current generation device (Blackberry 8830) with the iPhone instead of a 2 year old model you might like them a little more. The 8830 can act as a USB storage device using it's micro-SD expansion slot (not sure if Verizon disables this feature or not as I have the 8800). It can play most audio codecs including mp4 audio and mpeg 4 video. Since RIM introduced the Pearl last year many ISV's have begun releasing java apps specifically for BB devices. My 8800 has the best battery life of any phone I have ever owned but still has enough processing power to get the job done. I have never had Verizon service but have heard they disable any file transfer capabilities to force you to pay for their services (wallpaper, ringtone, applications) which is probably why you can't do file transfers (if Verizon was selling the iPhone it would most likely also suffer from this "feature").

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    64. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by emj · · Score: 3, Informative

      The more automation you have the more important the people you have are. If your workers don't care for quality you wont get it from the machines either,

    65. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Babbster · · Score: 1

      am not concerned by this. It is obvious that there will be many software releases in iPhone's future even for these 1.0 devices. If it is a big deal for many people, it can be fixed in the field.

      Well, gosh, if it can be fixed later then everyone should run out and buy the iPhone immediately! While doing so, I can't recommend highly enough that everyone using Windows XP immediately upgrade to Vista because, heck, whatever problems there might be will be fixed down the road in a Service Pack or two.
    66. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Babbster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It sure as hell makes that person superior to a tool who will buy any over-priced piece of shit with the Apple logo on it, features/bugs be damned!

      "What, we can't have high-speed mobile Internet? Oh, that's okay. We'll just be sure to do most of our browsing at Starbuck's where everyone can see us!"

      "I can't use my iPhone as a modem for my notebook? Oh, well. Why would I buy an iPhone and carry a notebook anyway? My MacBook Pro can just stay at home now!"

      "Thanks for selling me a shiny new iPhone. Hey, what's that stick you're pulling from behind the counter? You're going to shove that up my ass? Gosh, my iPhone experience is already feature-rich!!"

    67. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      IMing via SMS? Yeah, THAT sounds cheap. Not! :)

      Especially with the default plan of 200 text messages a month. That'd burn.

    68. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by LokiSnake · · Score: 1

      To this day, MINI (and Mini) owners still frequently wave, honk, flash, etc. at each other whenever they drive pass each other. And you know what, the MINI community is somewhat like the Apple/Mac one. Both are mostly enthusiastic about the great products and are the somewhat even cult icons, and there tends to be good reason for the enthusiasm. We rarely see these kinds of behavior based on consumer products. It might be saying something about the crap we get shoved down our throats everyday.

    69. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      IMing via SMS? Yeah, THAT sounds cheap. Not! :)

      Unlimited SMS/MMS on T-Mo is $14.99/mo. Between SMS and IM I'll use about 3,000 - 4,000 a month. That works out to less then half a penny per IM or SMS. That's not cheap?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    70. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by BrowncoatJedi · · Score: 0

      And you are a Venezuelan jackass.

    71. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by scolbert · · Score: 1

      The AT&T store in my neighborhood (Brick, NJ)... the one on Chambers Bridge Rd. started selling them at 5pm. The line was long and I guess they figured no one would know. I came back after dinner and walked right in to pick up a 4gb unit. Here's something else... how did the guys at Personafile have the products in their database with model number BEFORE 6pm? I saw their listings at noon on Friday.

    72. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by nbahi15 · · Score: 1

      I showed up to the AT&T store at 5:45, had the phone by 6:45. The AT&T staff were friendly, and extremely well organized. As for the phone, it is missing a few features, but ultimately it is the best phone I have ever owned. I would describe myself as "into phone technology", and specifically GSM, and have owned about a dozen different Nokia phones, 5 Motorola phones, and a couple of ericssons and this phone is a win based upon the Address Book, and call handling alone. The ability to make, merge, speaker, hold, get to other phone functions all at once in a rapid and intuitive manner makes this phone worth every penny. If you are one of those people that want a phone that does the basic functions 'correctly', then this is the phone for you. I find it funny that every phone that I have ever looked at has failed miserably on some or all of the basic features, and yet some people want every phone to be the equivalent of an OfficeJet, the worst fax, scanner, copier and printer rolled into one.

    73. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although I would have been a shade less rude to the man, I absolutely agree with your point that our society is tragically lacking in enthusiasm and verve and that Apple is a very nice exception to this rule.

      Apple people love Apple. Of course being a company ran by humans and not saints, Apple is not perfect, but it's awfully good considering the alternatives.

      In an amazingly joyless society, my only complaint is that I had to work on i-day and so I could not participate in the hoopla. I would have enjoyed it. And if you would not have, well, don't buy something like this on intro-day.

      I will be purchasing my iPhone shortly but I went to visit it in the store yesterday. It really does live up to the hype. A very impressive device.

      D

    74. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering, is there some reason you believe this to be a bad thing?

      I mean, to me it just seems like the natural thing to do. If you have fans, try and hire them to sell the product. Simple and effective.

      I think the real problem is that most businesses don't have fans ...

      D

    75. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a device, a device that has a feature list that is as good as (if not better than) the IPhone.

      If I lived in the US, why would I go to all the trouble of getting an IPhone with the drawbacks it has, when I already have a device that can do the following? Some of you may know where I'm going with this...
      * Plays MP3's, WMA's and videos
      * Connects to the internet through both GPRS and WiFi
      * Has a Quad-band GSM phone built in
      * Touch screen
      * With the right attachments is capable of GPS
      * Has a camera (with photo and video capability)
      * With this device I can play "advanced" games like Quake, write Word and Excel documents, read PDF's, write notes and take voice recordings
      * is extremely expandable

      What is it? An O2 XDA IIi - already a couple of years old. The newer Phone/PDA's I'm sure have better capability than even what I have. The IPhone is currently not available in Australia, but even if was I wouldn't get one. Sure, it may have an awesome user interface, but at what cost?

    76. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 1

      I have never had Verizon service but have heard they disable any file transfer capabilities to force you to pay for their services (wallpaper, ringtone, applications) which is probably why you can't do file transfers (if Verizon was selling the iPhone it would most likely also suffer from this "feature").

      What you've heard is quite true. I am not a fan of Verizon so far, but it's what my company chose to go with long before I was here. I can tell you that not more than three miles away from downtown in Columbus, OH I could not get *any* data service, and even calls were getting dropped frequently. So much for that "network" they like to tout!

    77. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by mblase · · Score: 1

      You are an american jackass buying a beautiful, lusty phone, but that doesn't have lots of standard features people expect on phones,

      Every time someone says or writes this, I crack up inside.

      "Standard features people expect on phones"? Dude, all the features I expect in a PHONE is the ability to make phone calls, store phone numbers, and occasionally send and receive a text message. Do you seriously think "Flash and Java support in the browser" is a STANDARD phone feature? Most portable phones still don't have a web browser at all.

      Bluetooth isn't high-bandwidth enough that I'd want to use it for file transfers. It's easier to download the email on my iPhone AND my computer.

      You don't NEED to use the thing as a modem because it's practically a Mac already.

      When you figure out a good way to implement copy-and-paste using two fingers on a touch screen, let me know.

      Realistically, the only big holes in the iPhone's feature set are IM support (everyone would probably complain that AOL and iChat are the only ones supported), but they're really only a downloadable widget away; and GPS, which would require additional hardware and a bigger iPhone and will doubtless be sold by Belkin any time now. Outside of those, every major complaint you have can be fixed with a 2.0 software update.

    78. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by L7_ · · Score: 1

      yeah, i got like 8 phone numbers this weekend, just from girls i started talking to asking about my phone

    79. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by leonem · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine a web-based iPhone app could probably work as a pretty good IM client.

      I'm hugely disappointed there's no proper API - I think OSX's API is one of its most compelling aspects - but the web-based system should be capable of filling some gaps.

    80. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by roscocoltran · · Score: 1

      ...then don't buy a phone that is also the best ipod available, and I'm not talking about web browsing. People seems to forget that this IS also an IPOD!

    81. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by leonem · · Score: 1

      I'd do the copy-and-paste (and a few other context-related features) with the same 'right-click' mechanism as recent Apple laptops - a two-fingered click brings up a little contextual menu.

      Anyone from Apple reading this? Isn't the API for this already built into Cocoa? How hard can it be?

    82. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by demi · · Score: 1

      There might be a few people here and there with different reasons. I ultimately decided the iPhone was too expensive, but if I had decided to get it I would definitely have tried to get on line at the AT&T store, because it would have been a gift for someone whose birthday is right now. I don't feel the need to have the latest and greatest thing. I did just get a Wii, but only because I happened to notice it sitting on the shelf.

      --
      demi
    83. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by drsquare · · Score: 1

      And making your employees sing songs and do stupid exercises before their 12 hour night shift is going to make them care? If my employer did that to me I'd make sure their machines didn't work.

      Most modern machinery can be run by monkeys anyway.

    84. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I got two phone numbers and laid in the middle of the park, and I didn't have to spend $500.

    85. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      America's Dictator cost billions of dollars and the intervention of a packed Supreme Court to elect, against the will of a majority of American voters. I'll take a freely elected dictator over George W Bush, any day.

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
    86. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Considering the trivial amount of resources it takes to handle SMS messages, I'd say that's highway robbery.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    87. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Eh, it's not like I disagree with you on the trivial amount of resources bit. And pay per use rates ($0.15/ea on every major US provider) are highway robbery. I was just disputing the GPs assumption that IM via SMS is too expensive to use. I don't consider half a penny per SMS "expensive". Whether or not it's "fair" given that SMS costs them nothing is a whole another story.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    88. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm totally in your demographic description. Born in Yorkshire in the north of England. Worked for nearly fifteen years in and around north London. Live in Scranton, PA. Dual US-UK citizenship. Bought the 'phone for my wife for her 37th birthday. She works a union job and I'm in an office. We met because we both like bands like the Stone Roses and REM. Never died our hairs black. Never lined up to get into one of the cool clubs. Never liked emo.

      You're just bitter because some floppy-haired fop got one from his mommy and you didn't, aren't ya?

    89. Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than great) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Wait a couple of weeks and you'll be able to just walk into the shop and buy it without waiting

      Yeah, like how I can walk into any electronics retail store and just pick up the Wii. :-P

  2. IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MY IPHONE DOESNT WORK.

    I activated two yesterday, they both worked for 12 hours. This morning neither phone will make or receive calls; or browse on EDGE.

    The GSM/EDGE modem is BRICKED -- STAY FAR AWAY. Apple blames ATT, and ATT blames Apple.

    These guys are in way over their heads. Meanwhile, 15 hours of tech support hold time later -- still can't make a call.

    1. Re:IBRICK. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meanwhile, 15 hours of tech support hold time later -- still can't make a call. If your new iPhone wasn't working maybe you shouldn't have used it to call tech support. ;-)
    2. Re:IBRICK. by KaptajnKold · · Score: 1

      I think it's symptomatic that the hype have been going on for so long now, that people have resorted to hyperbole ("These guys are in way over their heads") and YELLING, in order for their arguments to be discerned admidst the frenzy.

      Relax. Take a deep breath. Try not to succumb to the mass hysteria.

    3. Re:IBRICK. by Dopeskills · · Score: 1

      I am typing this from an iphone on a train and it works great!

    4. Re:IBRICK. by Organic+User · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am typing this from an iphone on a train and it works great! Pfft! The iPhone auto capitalizes the p in iPhone. Let me guess? You also forgot to set your user agent to:
      iPhone User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU like Mac OS X; en) AppleWebKit/420+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.0 Mobile/1A538a Safari/419.
      Or get on a train for that matter. Pfft. Lousy 6 digit user.
    5. Re:IBRICK. by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

      iPlone, iBone, iBrick, iJobs... When are folks going to realizes that this is all an iJoke.

    6. Re:IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So essentially what the AC was saying is he realizes he had a problem with his iPhone at 6 am this morning and spent the entire day up until his post on Slashdot at about 8 pm this evening on a call to tech support about his problem. I am surprised he had time to take a piss break much less eat. Now that is some dedicated (anti-)fanboyism!! All hail the Anti-Mac!

    7. Re:IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I activated two yesterday, they both worked for 12 hours. This morning neither phone will make or receive calls; or browse on EDGE.

      Like the ipod, the batteries suck on the iphone :)

    8. Re:IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank GOD we have another iPhone story. My day wouldn't be complete without it.

    9. Re:IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did it all wrong. That isn't how you post a funny comment! Too bad I am not one of those 2% helpful answer type people or I would of told you how to correctly post a funny comment.

    10. Re:IBRICK. by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

      Oh my god. Anecdotal evidence from one of 2 million people to buy an iPhone in the first 24 hours. The whole product is a failure. In fact, I am so upset about the 0.0000005% failure rate, that I am throwing away my working iPhone right now!

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    11. Re:IBRICK. by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      MY IPHONE DOESNT WORK. I activated two yesterday, they both worked for 12 hours. This morning neither phone will make or receive calls; or browse on EDGE. The GSM/EDGE modem is BRICKED -- STAY FAR AWAY. Apple blames ATT, and ATT blames Apple. These guys are in way over their heads.

      What's that? Buying a new Apple first-generation product at launch is a BAD IDEA??? Whodathunk it???

      I'll get mine in a couple of years. Thanks for eating the early-adopter sticker shock and bugs though.

    12. Re:IBRICK. by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      >>>MY IPHONE DOESNT WORK.

      >>>I activated two yesterday, they both worked for 12 hours. This morning neither
      >>>phone will make or receive calls; or browse on EDGE.

      This is perfectly normal, welcome to AT&T. What you have to do is turn off the phone, take out the battery... ah crap... uhh... whatever it is that is the equivalent of taking out the battery in an iphone. Let it sit for a few seconds and then turn it back on.

      I have to do this every morning in order to make and receive calls. Enjoy!

    13. Re:IBRICK. by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Depite all the cool Apple technology in them, you do still have to charge the iPhone now and then if you want it to keep working.

    14. Re:IBRICK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm posting this from your bedroom from my Blackberry while I wait for your wife to come back with the whipped cream. Have fun on the train.

  3. and i quote by User+956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone.

    It's not that they're incompetent. It's just that they don't care. They don't have to. They're the phone company.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:and i quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone."

      If one is an Apple fanboy that certainly sounds better than admitting that Apple just released and overhyped, overpriced, and underfeatured phone that has turned out to be a bomb in the marketplace.

    2. Re:and i quote by MBCook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For anyone who doesn't get this, it's a reference to AT&T's monopoly days when Saturday Night Live had a sketch starting Lilly Tomlin in '76 called simply enough... "The Phone Company." Surprisingly, I can't find a YouTube video.

      I don't think it's much of a surprise to anyone that AT&T might end up the weak link in this partnership. But I submitted this story because I think it shows just how different some companies (like Apple) view the consumers compared to others (like AT&T). This just happened to be a fantastic example of just how different the two ends of the spectrum are.

      Of course, if you were to look through enough of my posts, you'd see I don't have much regard for cell phone companies (or cable companies, or...). But then again that's quite common on Slashdot.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    3. Re:and i quote by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No it's incompetence.

      I recently bought a new smartphone. I refuse to buy any locked phone so I got a unbranded unlocked Samsung SGH-i607. Dropped in my sim and all was happy.

      I called up AT&T to add unlimited smartphone data service to my phone. They said I cant. I asked why and they said that the Samsung is not a smartphone.

      I then had to explain for 25 minutes how they sell the damned thing as a smartphone on their own website and that it is in fact a smartphone, please charge me $19.99 more a month and turn on the service.

      I had to go through 4, FOUR transfers and 2 managers all of them not believing that a product they sell as a smartphone is really a smartphone. Finally I gave up and told the next guy I had bough a new TREO 700w and need the smartphone unlimited plan.

      They said OH! and activated the changes.

      AT&T is rampant with incompetence. This happens every time I have to call them, people dont know what they sell or even offer let alone what to do.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:and i quote by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      For anyone who doesn't get this, it's a reference to AT&T's monopoly days when Saturday Night Live had a sketch starting Lilly Tomlin in '76 called simply enough... "The Phone Company." Surprisingly, I can't find a YouTube video.

      That's because that character of Tomlin's, Ernestine the Phone Operator, pre-dates SNL: It goes back to Rowan and Martin's Laugh-in.

      Here's a clip from The Cher Show.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    5. Re:and i quote by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      That sounds more like a policy of actively denying services to owners of unlocked phones. But then, don't they have to know what kind it is, somewhere in the process of activating data service?

    6. Re:and i quote by yabba-dabba-do · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the subjec have read... and iQuote Just a thought.

    7. Re:and i quote by ivoras · · Score: 1

      But then, don't they have to know what kind it is, somewhere in the process of activating data service?

      No. Isn't it nice to have well-defined communication protocols now?

      It would be like some site banning Firefox (or IE) because they use a slightly different HTTP than the rest.

      --
      -- Sig down
    8. Re:and i quote by dabraun · · Score: 1

      I called up AT&T to add unlimited smartphone data service to my phone. They said I cant. I asked why and they said that the Samsung is not a smartphone.
      I then had to explain for 25 minutes how they sell the damned thing as a smartphone on their own website and that it is in fact a smartphone, please charge me $19.99 more a month and turn on the service.


      If you followed through their website purchase system further you would see that they do not offer (on the site) the $20/mo data plan you refer to - they want something like $40/mo for a data plan with a different name. Now, all that said, you *can* get the $20/mo plan for the phone - but you need to jump through some hoops. If you were in the store and they were trying to sell you a phone they'd be more interested in jumping through said hoops.

      AFAIK the reason they try to get $40/mo is that the thing is actually useful for browsing the web and streaming video, unlike most "smartphones" before it, so they presume you'll use a lot more data - putting you in the same category as PDA phone users instead of "smartphone" users. At the end of the day though it's still running the smartphone version of windows mobile not the full-fledged/touch-screen version.
    9. Re:and i quote by larry+bagina · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually, AT&T fucking up is good for apple. The other cells turned down Apple. Why shouldn't they? Steve Jobs wanted concessions and the cell market is hard to break into, especially for a $600 phone. After Friday's sales figures come out, they'll regret that. The Apple/AT&T 5 year exclusive deal depends on AT&T providing a certain level of quality -- a level they can't meet. Apple can now break their AT&T exclusive deal and the other cell providers will be on it like CmdrTaco on a 12 year old boy.

      Apple to Ma Bell: Wham, baam, thank you ma'am!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    10. Re:and i quote by dave562 · · Score: 1
      But I submitted this story because I think it shows just how different some companies (like Apple) view the consumers compared to others (like AT&T). This just happened to be a fantastic example of just how different the two ends of the spectrum are.

      I think it also serves to highlight how different their perspectives are. For Apple, the iPhone is their cool new thing. I wouldn't say that they are betting the company's future on it, but it is definitely the "big thing" that they've been working on for lord only knows how long. As far as AT&T is concerned, it's just another phone. Marketting hype aside, it is just another phone. Remember when the Blackberry came out and everyone wanted one? Remember when the Treo came out and everyone wanted one? Remember when the Razr came out and everyone wanted one? Remember when the iPhone came out and everyone wanted one? Remember when.... Get the picture? It's just another consumer device, and in a year from now it is going to be a lot less flashy. In three to five years from now, everything on the iPhone is going to be more or less standard on other phones.

    11. Re:and i quote by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      You should also look at a 60's spy spoof called "The President's Analyst" with James Coburn. The "villians" were operatives of "TPC". The denouement was really funny, and made perfect sense when "TPC" was the only game in town...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    12. Re:and i quote by digitalchinky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think what you actually meant to say was that everything that is *already* bog standard on most all mid to high end phones made by every other manufacturer in the world, will eventually be given a slick makeover and *might* become standard on the iPhone in 3 to 5 years from now.

    13. Re:and i quote by waerloga01 · · Score: 1

      The problem is that AT&T define a 'smartphone' vs 'pda' devices by keypad type. Smartphones (as defined by AT&T) are a standard numberpad keypad while a PDA is defined as a QWERTY keypad. They have the obvious exceptions for Blackberry and (now) iPhones.

    14. Re:and i quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They said I cant

      Maybe if you'd just stopped canting they would have been more cooperative?

    15. Re:and i quote by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I'd still Really Like to find clips of the SNL bits though.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    16. Re:and i quote by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was kinda surprised at that myself. Even her Laugh-In bit is AWOL on YouTube.

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    17. Re:and i quote by Maserati · · Score: 1

      NBC needs to start putting individual SNL bits into the iTunes Store. Load them in as high-quality H.264s and let people buy and download each skit individually. Treat each show as an 'album' to allow the store to show opportunities for savings and charge the same as songs and albums. NBC could get people to part with a buck every time someone says "hey remember that bit.."

      Guess they don't want the money. Although rights to residuals on downloads probably ties the whole idea up six ways from Sunday. I'd like it, with an iPhone I'd probably spend at least $5 a month on skits.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    18. Re:and i quote by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, that's a great idea. Nicely played!

      Although an album of the Brad Hall years might not sell that well... :-)

      --
      "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    19. Re:and i quote by Maserati · · Score: 1

      And without the singles from that 'album" you'd never be able to get the one good skit he was in. Without the album, you'd never see the one good show from those seasons, unless it wound up on a guest-hosts collection. NBC must just not want the money.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  4. AT&T is out of iPhones by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

    "Virtually all of our stores sold out of the iPhone last night," AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel said, declining to specify how many units had been sold. I guess selling out means the AT&T stores can't screw things up any more, can they?

    "There are some whose activation process is being delayed and that's something that can happen in a launch like this and we're resolving those on a case-by-case basis," Siegel said. ... but I could be wrong ;-)

    While AT&T performed credit checks on customers who came to its stores to buy the iPhone on Friday, Apple stores did not.

    When it came to activating the device, AT&T customers were given a code to tap into iTunes, proving they were already approved for the service and allowing them to skip some steps in the online process. Apple customers would have to go through that process at home in front of their computer.

    If they found out that they did not meet the requirements, they would be offered the option of signing up for a prepaid plan I guess AT&T isn't handling everything badly.
    1. Re:AT&T is out of iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the att store in midtown where i got my iphone, they gave out 14 digit pre-approval numbers - the itunes activation windows only accepted 9, 11, 12 digit numbers... yah - att's system was just a big waste of time.

    2. Re:AT&T is out of iPhones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Virtually all of our stores sold out of the iPhone last night"

      What does that mean? I think I can "virtually" fly.

  5. iPhone VS OpenMoko by Marcion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I need a new phone, I thought about the iPhone, but decided to wait for the OpenMoko if it emerges, if not then I go for a Nokia smartphone.

    Firstly, being stuck to the set provider is not very cool, secondly the other two phones are far more hackable for us open-source geeks.

    1. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Tony · · Score: 3, Informative

      The NEO1973 is arriving July 9th. At least, the early-bird version is, without WiFi. The WiFi, official version arrives in October.

      I'm pretty damned happy. I've been waiting a long time.

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    2. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by imroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean the FIC Neo1973. OpenMoko is the software stack.

    3. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Goaway · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why Apple succeeds where others fail - they don't name their products "FIC Neo1973".

    4. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to your link, the "base" version will cost $300, and the "developer" version (with a 2nd battery, USB host cable, debug board, etc.) will cost $450. You wouldn't happen to have a guess at what the WiFi-enabled October version will cost, would you?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by dgp · · Score: 1

      i have been waiting for the neo1973 since i first heard about it in februrary.
      i thought it'd be great to at least have until the launch of the iPhone.
      i waited for months on #openmoko and hardware news was extremely hard to
      come by. now that the iphone is out im not sure the neo1973 has enough appeal
      anymore. video playback is what i mostly want in my next phone. i played
      with an iphone today and it was completely seducing. the neo1973 has a
      smaller screen. the one hardware feature it has going for it is a GPS receiver.

    6. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I agree. When my last phone died (after the iPhone announcement) I bought a Nokia E62 expecting to wait what will come out of Apple.

      For me, the most hackable phone wins.

    7. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by imroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except Infogear (acquired by Cisco in 2000) had the iPhone name trademarked years before Apple came up with it. And 1973 is the year the first call on a mobile phone was made. I dare say the 'Neo1973' name is a little more original that slapping a lower case 'i' on the front of a generic term.

    8. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Goaway · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure my point still stands.

    9. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if the Apple Fanboys wouldn't be jerking off to the Apple PhoneFlex-G566Y, if that's what Steve Jobs wanted to call it.

    10. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Nobody cares about an original name. I can call my next cell phone the Flooblegarber 17-and-a-half, and people will remember its name just about as well as they remember "FIC Neo1973". On the other hand, everyone knows what an iPhone is, what it's supposed to do, and what company made it.

    11. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody hell, I thought you were just joking when you said "FIC Neo1973", until I clicked to read the parent post. There's actually a phone called FIC Neo1973!!

    12. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the iPhone is doing ok so far because it's Apple, has a nice UI, and a sleak design... People couldn't care less about it's name. Remember the Wii? Despite the horrible penis jokes what system is poised to become number one?

    13. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might even come with functional shift-keys!

    14. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by hirschma · · Score: 2, Informative

      I own a Nokia E61. You will be very disappointed with a Nokia smartphone - buggy, crap features, etc. I was completely surprised at the shoddy execution.

      I'm guessing that in the UK you get return rights, tho. Make sure that you do.

    15. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by murph · · Score: 1

      I was seriously thinking about it, but $450 for the base model with WiFi in October is awful steep, though.

      --
      I don't care about your karma, I don't care about what's hip. --Weird Al
    16. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps you just never understood that "Wii" is a great name?

    17. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right back at ya. Perhaps you just never understood that "FIC Neo 1973" is a great name? :)

    18. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that FIC is the name of the company manufacturing the hardware right? How is that any worse than Nokia, or Samsung, or Apple?

    19. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Personally I can't wait for their entry into bathroom fixtures with the iShit toilet.

      i + "term" is just as ridiculous as e + "term"

      I'll leave out the part where there are 3 year old phones with better feature sets.....

    20. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't think there's really all that much a chance of that turning out to be the case.

    21. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Here's your cookie for "not buying into the hype!"

      Good lad!

    22. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Succeeds at what? Is my VW Golf a design failure because a grand piano can't fit in it?

      (I've just finished reading "Designing for People", by Henry Dreyfuss. I'm very aware now that the question is not "good design vs bad design", but rather "appropriate design".)

      Apple is marketing to consumers. Anybody who walks in off the street can say "I want to buy an iPhone", and make a phone call with it. Developers seem to be awfully suspicious of it, at best, because there's no real SDK (apart from Javascript).

      OpenMoko's two phones that will be available on July 9th are described as "everything the mobile application developer needs to enjoy the benefits of the first freed phone" and "everything the mobile device hacker wants to get down and dirty with the first freed phone". Consumers have, in general, never heard of it.

      For the OpenMoko people to sell a phone called the "iPhone" when they're targeting "mobile device hackers" would have been as absurd as Apple naming their phone the "FIC Neo1973".

    23. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't happen to have a guess at what the WiFi-enabled October version will cost, would you?

      No guess, sorry. All I have is the printed words on the press release he linked to: "GTA02 (AKA: The Mass Market Neo 1973) is on schedule to go on sale in October. It will have the following new hardware components:
        * 802.11 b/g WiFi
        * Samsung 2442 SoC
        * SMedia 3362 Graphics Accelerator
        * 2 3D Accelerometers
        * 256MB Flash
      We will sell this device through multiple channels. Direct from openmoko.com, the price will be $450 for the Neo Base and $600 for Neo Advanced."

    24. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen fagpie. FIC Neo 1973 is a fucking horrible name. It won't sell shit. Deal.

    25. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "iPhone Pro" :p

      I'd buy one.

    26. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Tony · · Score: 1

      Smaller screen, higher resolution. True VGA. No camera, but I don't like cell phone cameras.

      And it's *open*. All this bitching about the iPhone only working with AT&T, and not being able to do anything with it-- that's all solved.

      But you're right. I'm sad it's taken so long.

      --
      Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    27. Re:iPhone VS OpenMoko by Marcion · · Score: 1

      Well iPhone is a 2.5G phone, in the 3G world, best not to touch it with a bargepole. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/07/03/stingy_att _iphone_network_snafu/

  6. Unlock and get out of contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been wondering: Is it possible to buy an iPhone and either not activate service at all, or cancel it in the first month because the coverage is not good (which is generally true for AT&T)?

    Unlocking is just a matter of time.

    1. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      What is generally true of AT&T, that one can cancel the first month, or that the coverage is not good? I've had good coverage on Cingular (now AT&T).

    2. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      My wife has Cingular (now AT&T) and she really can't complain about the coverage. In fact compared to my T-Mobile coverage she seems to do quite well. Only Verizon has more local coverage, and that's only because they have a contract with the subway system for exclusive access to cellphone repeaters, and the Verizon coverage isn't as good as Cingular once you go out in the country. I don't know about Sprint, I've never had a Sprint phone.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can sign up for the 2-year contract and if you cancel within 30 days, you get the activation fee back and you pay no cancelation fee. Your iPhone will keep working for wifi, etc.

      You can also get a prepaid plan, which is cheaper if you don't use voice minutes, and you can cancel that at any time with no penalty.

    4. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Coverage" isn't the only metric people should judge carriers by. In years of use, I have rarely encountered lack of coverage with AT&T Wireless/Cingular/AT&T. But a poor experience with Verizon (and a Treo 700p, if it matters) led me to cancel service before the end of the evaluation period. I was tempted by the EVDO, but the sound quality was not up to snuff. Verizon coverage in a highly populated resort destination was also poor, while AT&T Wireless (the original) had excellent signal strength and coverage. As for the sound quality, high frequencies were clipped by Verizon, such that S and F were often indistinguishable, leading to misunderstandings, even when the speaker was asked repeatedly to repeat (to the point of annoyance!) Furthermore, Verizon/700p seemed to go silent during gaps in conversation, and these silent gaps could not be distinguished from a transient loss of signal. In contrast, GSM AT&T generally has a soft white noise going on in the background when the connection is good, so it's usually possible to distinguish a gap in the conversation from a gap in service. During an important conversation, a gap in service demands that the other party be asked if they might have said something that was lost in the ether. With Verizon, you'll be tempted to do this often.

    5. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

      Not true. I returned my iPhone today due to lack of coverage at my house. I called AT&T to cancel the service. They don't actually cancel it until you return the phone to the store. They said if I didn't return it within 14 days you get hit with the early termination fee.

    6. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by cadience · · Score: 1

      You only have 14 days to get out of at&t contract if you created a new one with the iPhone data plan. If the phone is open you "may" be charge a 10% restocking fee - but I saw this waved for a customer while I was in the store.

    7. Re:Unlock and get out of contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are price drops and new models.

  7. breaking their deal with at&t by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 0

    I'm betting that within 6 to 9 months Apple will either buy out or break their 2-year exclusivity contract with AT&T. I'm sure the penalties will be high if they do break it, but it will probably be more than made up for in sales.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:breaking their deal with at&t by ragefan · · Score: 1

      I'm betting that within 6 to 9 months Apple will either buy out or break their 2-year exclusivity contract with AT&T. I'm sure the penalties will be high if they do break it, but it will probably be more than made up for in sales. I think the much more likely scenario is that Gen2 iPhone comes out for use with other provider(s). Other providers will probably be much more willing to play ball after the hoopla generated by the initial version. The advantage for Apple is that everyone that wanted to go to the next model would have to buy a new model has previous threads have mentioned the current iPhone is locked to AT&T for 5 years.
    2. Re:breaking their deal with at&t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes sense to me. Apple wouldn't break or renegotiate the contract because they're probably getting substantial cash out of the contract portion with AT&T--either per phone or per completed contract or as a lump sum. After all, this is a pricey subscription at the baseline which amounts to over $1500 over two years for the basic contract...either AT&T paid a premium for the exclusivity up front or they're sharing the risk/rewards with apple.

  8. Give me a break by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Day one revealed what all Apple aficionados fear. That AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone."

    I am sorry, but what the hell is this supposed to mean? For one thing, this is day one of the damn phone being sold, and it is no surprise that the AT&T monkeys were in a panic trying to get the phones to activate on the spot. If it hadn't occurred to anyone, those who went to the Apple stores got their boxes and then left and activated the phone via iTunes. Those who went to AT&T had their phones activated in-store, thus causing slower activations and the incompetence that you expect from your mobile phone carriers.

    Does anyone see the difference here now? The summary of this article is pure crap.

    1. Re:Give me a break by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah, but now if the iphone tanks (we can only hope...) the Apple fanboys will have a good excuse: it was AT&T's fault all along!

    2. Re:Give me a break by ushering05401 · · Score: 2

      Hmmm. I disagree with you. There can be all sorts of hangups with plan activation if there is anything funny with your credit report. For me it was a disputed medical bill from a number of years ago on an otherwise clean report.

      Technicians in the store have the ability to call HQ to get clearance in situations like this while customer support phone service is much less efficient (my experience dealing with specifically with cell phone companies).

      If I am launching a major new product with the potential for activation difficulties I want every customer to know exactly where they stand before they leave the store instead of getting home and finding that they only automatically qualify for a pre-paid or otherwise more cumbersome type of service.

      A more tightly phased roll-out would have seemed wiser than this free-for-all, but Apple just putting product in customer's hands without checking for roadblocks to activation seems to be the poorly thought out strategy here.

      Don't get me wrong... there was probably poor planning on the AT&T side as well, but I have had cell-phone difficulties and understand why the phone company wanted to deal with those issues up front. It's not like the most of the Apple store customers necessarily got anything faster in the end if the volume of activation problem postings on the net is any indication.

      Regards.

    3. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Um, clearly you have no idea how the whole release worked. There was ZERO activation in the stores; everything is done through iTunes. The only thing that was performed (and it was optional--could also be done online) was a credit check that all mobile providers conduct.

      So precisely how can the AT&T 'monkeys' panic over activation?

    4. Re:Give me a break by SupaFly · · Score: 1, Informative

      iPhones were not activated in ATT stores, you had to take it home and use iTunes like everyone else.

    5. Re:Give me a break by Mizled · · Score: 1
      I went to an AT&T store and they had me activate in itunes like everyone else. Activation only took about 2-3 mins too. I will say this, The AT&T employees were idiots and very unprepared for the launch.

      Btw im making this post from my iPhone. =p

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass.
    6. Re:Give me a break by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      Those who went to AT&T had their phones activated in-store, thus causing slower activations and the incompetence that you expect from your mobile phone carriers.


      That's an interesting perspective. It's a perspective that only suffers from one tiny flaw: AT&T were not activating iPhones in the stores. Anywhere. Every one had to do so through iTunes. So the only activation problems the AT&T monkeys had to deal with were the ones produced by incompetence up the food chain. In a word: corporate.

      So, do you see the lack of difference now? Your comment is pure crap.
      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    7. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone else? Wrong. The AT&T store here was activating them, and they had no idea you could do it yourself. It took them about seven hours to sell their ~35 they had. I spent five hours in line, which wasn't bad, but I had to wait longer than that on their salesdrones. Those people just don't try. Even the managers wouldn't work. The three of them at the local store spent the entire evening and night smoking cigarettes behind the building. The sales people had no idea how to get the iPhones to call out. I watched them work for almost an hour with the first customer in an attempt to test the service. When I finally asked about iTunes activation because I heard it on the radio while waiting, the salesmorons of course had never even heard of iTunes. I don't know where you came-up with your ridiculous story that customers were using iTunes.

    8. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not entirely true. The management at the AT&T store I went to told use they weren't allowed to open the box and activate the phone. They sent everyone home to use iTunes, just like at the Apple Store.

      Also, while I'm not here to defend AT&T, keep in mind that the people working the floors were kept in the dark about nearly everything related to the iPhone up until mere days before launch. In some cases, information was not even revealed to them until that very morning. Anyone who deals with Apple at the corporate level knows they're incredibly tight with information and I strongly suspect that, in part, contributed to the perceived cluelessness of AT&T.

      AT&T could also be partially retarded.

    9. Re:Give me a break by eharvill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I went to an AT&T store and they had me activate in itunes like everyone else. Activation only took about 2-3 mins too. I will say this, The AT&T employees were idiots and very unprepared for the launch. Btw im making this post from my iPhone. =p I wouldn't blame the AT&T employees for being unprepared for the launch - blame Apple. They were terribly secretive about anything iPhone related, literally hours before launch. My girlfriend has the unfortunate pleasure of working for AT&T, specifically working in the group that supports their "data" phones (Treos, Blackberry's, iPhones, etc). She received exactly 2 hours of iPhone training before launch day. The day of launch she got another 3 hours of training. I'm assuming the employees in the store got less. It's not a surprise they we "unprepared." Apple's fault, not AT&T's. Her group did not even get a demo unit to look at until Friday, a few hours before launch. Apple was so worried about leaks or whatnot before launch. Now that she has had most of today to play with it, she says it's ridiculously easy to use. Unfortunately the caliber of customer that has purchased the unit is more than clueless to say the least. It's amazing the number of CEO's, government officials, entertainers, etc that are completely technology illiterate - sadly, many of those were on the VIP list and first to get phones.
      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    10. Re:Give me a break by Mizled · · Score: 1

      Its not that I'm really placing blame on anyone specific. It took me around 40 min just to buy the phone itself and this was after 6pm and after I was talking to an employee/buying the phone. I'm an existing customer too! The whole thing was a lengthy process and unorganized.

      --
      Bite my shiny metal ass.
    11. Re:Give me a break by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I can understand your pain. It took nearly three hours for my girlfriend to help a customer get their iPhone activated. For whatever reason it adds several layers of complication because he had a business account and not a personal account. Of course, this particular gentleman (the CEO of a very large and well known nationwide company) had no idea what a USB port was and doesn't use Outlook b/c it is "too complicated" - needless to say, it was quite a process to get his contacts synchronized. lol

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    12. Re:Give me a break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone call Home Depot. I found one of their missing tools.

      "Those who went to AT&T had their phones activated in-store, thus causing slower activations and the incompetence that you expect from your mobile phone carriers. Does anyone see the difference here now? The summary of this article is pure crap."

      YOUR comments are pure crap, pulled directly from the depths of your ass.

    13. Re:Give me a break by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The AT&T store that I lined up at (local Apple Store was mobbed, I guess wrong about who would have enough, etc.) was performing the credit check on every single person who bought on. They let in 6 people at a time, and the line moved once every 15 minutes tops. They botched it. Then I went to a local Apple Store (one reported to have huge lines) and picked one up this morning. Took seconds. The Apple guy rang me up where I stood, gave me the box (in a pretty custom bag) and receipt, and sent me on my way. Total elapsed time, 5 minutes, including ooh-ing and aah-ing the demo model and being friendly with the sales guy. Apple: Win AT&T: Cruddy

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    14. Re:Give me a break by prockcore · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't blame the AT&T employees for being unprepared for the launch - blame Apple.


      I'd blame whoever decided that 6pm on a Friday was a good time to launch a new product.
    15. Re:Give me a break by Geordie+Korper · · Score: 1

      Although your comment is interesting it is not relevant. Technical support is not the issue. The issue is that people who wanted to and had the ability to pay for a $600 product were not able to purchase it in a timely manner because the ATT stores lied about availability and took 10-20 minutes per customer instead of 2-3 like the Apple stores. Same product and same activation process but widely different buying experiences.

    16. Re:Give me a break by yabos · · Score: 1

      I don't know why anyone expected everything to go 100% smooth. It rarely happens with any new release especially something so big as this where thousands of people are all trying to activate at once. I'm sure ATT and Apple made all the preparations they thought were needed but there's nothing that can prepare you for everything that may happen.

    17. Re:Give me a break by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      AT&T did this because the entire business model for a retail wireless phone store is to sell accessories while you're waiting for the activation process. That's how they trained us at RadioShack, and I'm sure that's how they trained them at AT&T/Cingular stores.

      When I drove past an AT&T store here, the "sales associates" were standing outside with the security lady. I heard one of them say "I get the next customer, ok?" Obviously, they're working on commission, so the sales associates in the AT&T store have a strong incentive to keep you in the store as long as possible to sell you as much as possible.

      When I worked at RadioShack, I got a small chunk of cash added to my paycheck every time someone bought a phone, but I got a larger wad of cash for 1 accessory, even larger at 2. The holy grail was 3 accessories, when I got the most money. I don't remember what the actual dollar values were, but I went out dinner at very nice places with the accessory bonuses I got.

    18. Re:Give me a break by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Exactly right. I was told that new accounts had to run the credit preapproval and existing ones had to record the number and account name they would be activated on. My AT&T store had 5 sales people and 25 people in front me and it took me an hour to get out. That's better than the 20 minute average they told us to expect. The next day I went to the Apple store for accessories and bought two additional iPhones for friends. It took less than a minute.

      The AT&T rep told be that iTunes must be logged into iTS and the account used must have the same name as the AT&T account. Of course, neither of these things turned out to be true. They also said that I had to match my iPhone serial number to the activation they'd recorded in the store. That also can't be true since Apple wasn't doing any of that.

      On the plus side, my activation went smoothly and it may not have without the preapproval code. Who knows.

      The AT&T store I went to had 40 in the line and the Apple store upstairs had 300. Each line was emptied in about 90 minutes yet the Apple store didn't run out of product. Interesting.

  9. Hurray for early adopters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm glad there's people who will put up with all the hiccups, problems, and long waits. Suffering through the frustrations for me. There's no way I'd wait in line for hours to get one of these things. Y'know it's a mass produced item. If you can wait a few days/weeks. Then you can go in at your convenience, no wait, get the phone you want, and hopefully all the activation issues/major bugs will be ironed out by then (if there are any). And v1.0 usually has some bugs/issues.

    I for one am sick of bleeding on the bleeding edge. "Oh new and shiny today!". Tomorrow it's just old news "Yeah so what..." Good luck to all of you suckers. I'm on AT&T right now and looking to drop them after my contract is up. I'm hoping Apple gets a version out that will work with another provider... but I'm gonna wait and see. It's definitely not automatic but that interface sure is slick :).

  10. my iPhone works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I waited an hour in line at the Apple Store in Boca Raton. Got a couple of phones for my small biz, went home, activated one, transferring my Verizon phone number, was up an running last night. No biggie. Works great. Clearly the best option out there even with the slowww EDGE network. Any techie worth much in the biz world will have lots of wifi options so I can deal with occassional slow EDGE. Worst case in the field, I'll boot up my Mac with its Verizon EVDO wireless and setup a wifi net for the phone ;)

    1. Re:my iPhone works great by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Errr.... wow. You have a lot of angst built up. Relax. It's just a phone. When you need a new one, you'll get one. I barely use my phone. I'm certainly not in Apple's target demographic for the iPhone. Others may have their own reasons for upgrading. No need to flout your penis size.

      P.S. Mine is bigger.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:my iPhone works great by Belacgod · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd believe you if you spelled corporate correctly.

    3. Re:my iPhone works great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, true Captains of Industry spend their time trolling slashdot anonymously.

    4. Re:my iPhone works great by yabos · · Score: 1

      You are a sad, sad person. Why do you care so much if people like the iPhone? You have some superiority complex or something?

  11. um, zero dollars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    i was trying to be classy calling them colleagues, but technically they're employees at a company in which I own a majority stake. i've chosen to purchase the iphone for them as I believe it benefits their productivity. but thanks for assuming the worst.

    ACing this because i don't feel like wasting karma on you.

  12. Satisfaction by HappyCycling · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not sure what market everyone else was in, but in my small Tennessee town, it couldn't have been a smoother purchase. I walked into the AT&T store Saturday afternoon at 3:30pm, they had 4 8gb, 4 4gb iPhones in-stock. I needed to transfer my number form my dad's account (I've been paying the bill for the last 2 years) and possibly pay a deposit for a new contract under my name with my old number. It took me about 15 minutes on the phone with a transfer rep. and less than 5 minutes to confirm everything was correct (with no deposit) to get in and out. Got home, activated the phone in about 5 minutes; everything works perfectly with my new awesome phone. They couldn't have been more helpful at the AT&T store; looks like a case of YMMV.

  13. Q: What do you get when you cross Apple and AT& by SimHacker · · Score: 1, Funny

    A: AT&T.

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  14. I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T aga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As New England Telephone became NYNEX and NYNEX became Verizon, I continued to keep my long distance service with AT&T for no reason other than that I always had. At the time of the incident I'm about to describe, I had been an AT&T customer for approximately twenty-five years at the same address and the same telephone number. And I doubt that I had ever paid late even once.

    About the only thing that changed was that, as an experiment, instead of mailing them a check, I used my bank's online bill-paying service. Things went OK for several months. The month of the incident I am about to relate, I authorized online payment of AT&T's bill about eight business days before the due date. The bank's online site said that payment would take five days, because apparently AT&T didn't accept electronic payments from them.

    Then, one night, at dinnertime, I got a telephone call from a collection agency saying my account was overdue.

    Briefly, the facts as they ultimately emerged were: a) the bank statement showed the bill as having been "paid" about five days before the due date; b) the image of the back of the cancelled check from the bank showed AT&T's bank as having received it several days before the due date; c) AT&T's own records showed the bill as having been paid one or two days late.

    AT&T's billing office was perfectly nice and acknowledged having received payment. In a few days they sent me a written acknowledgement.

    But the collection agency wouldn't stop calling.

    AT&T kept saying they had told the collection agency they had received payment. The collection agency kept saying "This office has not received that information."

    The collection agency refused to provide me with any contact information other than a post office box number.

    I mailed them photocopies of the back of the cancelled check and AT&T's statement showing payment. The people on the phone said they had not received them. (Since they would not provide anything but a PO box I couldn't send the material by certified mail).

    They continued to phone me every night at dinner time for several weeks.

    Eventually the calls stopped, but I was extremely ticked off. I sent a polite, well-worded letter to the CEO of AT&T--who was it? Ivan something-or-other? Seigelman? Seidenberg, saying I thought I'd been treated pretty badly and I wanted them to at least refund that month's bill, about $65. Someone from Seidenberg's office called me, talked to me, listened carefully, apologized nicely, and said they would indeed send the $65.

    A week passed. No $65. Two weeks. Three weeks. A month. No check in the mail.

    I switched my long-distance service to another carrier. I left a message with whomever it was at Seidenberg's office, explaining why. I got a returned message from the same person, who sounded genuinely upset, saying that she had instructed some office or other to send me the check but that apparently it hadn't happened. A week later I did, in fact, get a check for $65.

    But I had already switched, and needless to say I didn't switch back.

    For the next year, I got periodic mailing and occasional phone calls from AT&T saying they missed me, and wouldn't I switch back.

    Unbelievable. I'm very lazy. Absolutely all AT&T ever had to do to keep me as a customer was to exploit my inertia and not do anything to actively drive me away. They lost a 25-year customer by a) siccing a collection agency on me for one bill that was two days late according to AT&T... and on time according to the back of the check, and b) utterly screwing up the follow-up.

  15. iPhone Sells Out, Apple Doomed! by twitter · · Score: 0

    How can anyone turn a story about frenzied buying and sell outs into one of bungling and failure? Steve Ballmer is smoldering somewhere, wishing Zune or Vista had met with similar success. There's no doubt, iPhone is a winner.

    Even I want one, but it will be a long time. I'm not going to leave Sprint over a phone, especially one that cost so much. They can get me later if they half the price, give it an easy to access sim card and make it so I can use it with Amarok.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:iPhone Sells Out, Apple Doomed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kind of surprised that you have been supporting Apple lately. Most of your posts lead people to believe that you care a lot about free software. Many would even say that you are fanatical about it. Considering that Apple is primarily a closed source company that ties their software to "Apple certified" hardware, why are you pro-Apple? I don't use Apple or Microsoft products but I think that the computing industry would be far worse off if Apple was dominant.

      P.S. Apple will never allow you to use Amarok on the iPhone.

    2. Re:iPhone Sells Out, Apple Doomed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

        Looks like you're trying to bash Microsoft!
        Would you like me to:

         o Show you how to use dolar signs to be cool

         o Help you come up with a retarded conspiracy
           theory that involves Steve Ballmer and
           farm animals

         o Play "Give Us the Source" by RMS while
           you crapflood Slashdot or Digg

         o Recompile the kernel again
      _____
      /     \
      |-   -|
        0   0
      | |   |
      | |   |
      | \___/
      \______/

  16. It would be no different with any carrier by cenonce · · Score: 1

    It would have been no different with any other cell carrier, Verizon, Sprint, T-Mobile, or whoever. What choice did Apple have but pick the best of the worst? (Whether AT&T truly is the best of the worst remains to be seen, but they apparently gave Apple the deal they wanted).

    Everybody makes the incorrect assumption that you are going to get the same user experience with a cell phone carrier as you do with Apple. At least with Apple, one company gives a hoot in the arrangement. You get the same customer service from Microsoft when you buy a Windows Mobile phone as you do with your carrier.

    I will be leaving Verizon for AT&T when I get an iPhone, so I hope the service is comparable. I am not however expecting the customer service to be any better.

    1. Re:It would be no different with any carrier by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      You get the same customer service from Microsoft when you buy a Windows Mobile phone as you do with your carrier.

      I didn't think you dealt directly with MS for Windows Mobile devices, but rather with the company that created the device, such as Palm or Motorola.
      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
    2. Re:It would be no different with any carrier by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      I disagree, but I think service and customer service varies by area.


      I've lived in the Dallas, TX area for 13 years. Through several jobs and several work-assigned cell phones, I think I've dealt with nearly all of the cell phone carriers in some form or fashion. I also did a good deal of research before purchasing a personal mobile phone and service about five years ago (I kept denying that I needed a mobile phone). Verizon is the clear winner on customer service and one of the best as far as coverage and features offered.

      I haven't tested or talked to someone who uses AT&T recently, but I would wager ever since the "raising the bar" promotion a few years back that AT&T has saturated the area with coverage. I've had two dropped calls since I've been with Verizon for the past five years, there has been one billing error that was resolved quickly and easily, and I've been very pleased will all aspects of the service and customer service. My only complaint is that their marketing/sales teams do not know I'm a customer of every service they offer (wireless, land line, internet, TV), so I keep getting mail offers and knocks on the door. I can live with that.

      What boggles my mind is why Apple chose AT&T only. Why limit iPhone users to a single carrier? While I'm interested in the iPhone, I will NOT leave Verizon to get it.

      What I suspect is that Verizon, and possibly the other carriers, recognized this launch and lack of information for exactly what it was - a major promotion to stir up lots of consumer noise and early adopter sales. I hope the iPhone will be offered on all carriers in the future. When it comes to Verizon's service, I'll think about getting one.

  17. Not troll, I swear by Bombula · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is not troll, but doesn't it strike anyone else as fairly crazy that people are lining up for hours and planning entire days around buying something? It's not like this is an AIDS vaccine or the cure for cancer. I've never really understood the mentality of lining up outside the store or the theater in order to get something or see something at the earliest possible moment. Can someone please explain this whole phenomenon to me? It seems a lot like a drug user itching for a fix, or some equally unhealthy and unhinged obsession with instant gratification. I'm very open to being corrected on this, but it doesn't seem normal to me.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Not troll, I swear by edschurr · · Score: 1

      If you want the phone, why not hang out in line all day to get it earlier? All there is back at home is TV and the Internet.

    2. Re:Not troll, I swear by epte · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't you ever notice that these campout events never coincide? Don't tell anyone, but... those Star Wars fans, Lord of the Rings fans, iPhone fans... they're all the same people. They're a hired group of actors who inflate the perceived popularity of a product. All other victims of the consequent group think then aren't insane; they're just conformists. As for the AIDS and cancer patients, I'd be seriously worried for their health. What are they doing camping out for a day in their condition??

    3. Re:Not troll, I swear by bjourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is not normal. But it what society has become. Products, products, products! Buy more, buy faster! Buying makes you happy. etc. Nerds are no different from anyone else. Teenage girls buy makeup and clothes to make them happy. Nerds buy shiny new iPhones. People aren't rational, smart companies acknowledge that.

    4. Re:Not troll, I swear by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      If you want the phone, why not hang out in line all day to get it earlier?

      Because there's still a risk they'll run out. See also the story.

      All there is back at home is TV and the Internet.

      Well, for you, maybe. But even in that case, that's more fun than waiting for 10 hours in a line, and not even be guaranteed anything.

      No, I probably don't understand this either. :-)

      Give it a week or two, and have things much more convenient. You'll have lots of first experience reviews in too as a bonus.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    5. Re:Not troll, I swear by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Meh... for some people it's about the event itself. It's exciting, and you have a little story to tell, "I waited in line for 8 hours and was one of the first to..." whatever. It's almost like going to Times Square to watch the ball drop-- it's not fun. Standing in Times Square shoulder to shoulder in the freezing cold pretty well sucks, but loads of people still do it.

      Why do people go to concerts? You can just listen to the music at home. Why go to parties or events at all, since most of them don't really achieve anything? People just like being part of fun and exciting events for no reason other than they like to. It's not such a big deal.

    6. Re:Not troll, I swear by cowscows · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sometimes people need something trivial to get excited about. Life isn't all peaches and cream for many people, and sometimes your goals in life seem way out of reach or way far into the future. It's nice to set yourself little manageable goals every now and then, and reward yourself with something nice occasionally. It can be comforting in a way to cheer for something/someone else, even if you have no official connection with them. It's very similar to how some people are hardcore hometown sports fans. It's a very common human thing to do, just now marketing departments are getting good at steering some of that enthusiasm away from stuff like professional sports and celebrities, and instead focusing it on companies and products.

      Basically, it can be fun to be passionate about trivial things sometimes. Whether it's a football team, a rock band, a video game console, or a phone company, it lets you revel in some of the emotion and excitement that 8 hours of work and two hours of commuting each day doesn't let you use.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    7. Re:Not troll, I swear by Bemopolis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's not crazy. Why did I (and thousands of others) stand line up for hours? If you would like a hint, pick up an iPhone and try to exploit its advertised features. Now pick up an unfamiliar cellphone and try to exploit its features. The amount of time I spent in line is dwarfed by the amount of time I spend trying to learn how to use a fraction of the advertised features of whatever cellphone a plan offers me. That's assuming, of course, that the usefulness of the cellphone hasn't been hampered by the provider itself.

      So, unless you prefer dumping hours of your precious life down the tubes reading a poorly-written manual to learn (or, morel likely, not learn) a crappily-designed UI, it should seem quite normal. Life is too short to memorize arbitrary menu navigation.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    8. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Digging through the manual, calling 611 to get help, and googling all take about 2 hours to figure out a new phone. Some people waited in line for days.

      Think about that. You were more willing to stand around for 4 to 10 hours, than spend 2 hours learning.

      I believe that sums up Mac people's inclination to pay more for the same computer, but with a marginally better user interface. They are just massively lazy in a weird kind of autistic, neurotic way. Like a kleptomaniac who will work all week to steal a day's honest pay, they will work all day to avoid having their pristine little creative minds intruded upon with evidence of humanity's general stupidity.

      Not that there is anything wrong with that, as long as they are spending their own money. When you have a mac-addict girlfriend you have to do a lot less free sys admin work to do. Never give them an "ibook loan" though.

    9. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've never spent any time reading the manual for any of my phones and I've never had a problem with any of them. Surprisingly enough, there are also several operations that my phones can perform that the iPhone can't. A phone that can't be used as a modem, that has no accessible filesystem, no IM, no junk mail filters and doesn't even have a development kit outside of web applications isn't even an option for me. I think a lot of the people pushing this "using any phone besides the iPhone is HARD" idea are just trying to find a way to justify their purchase.

      And yes, I've used an iPhone. While it was fairly nice, I wasn't overly impressed and definitely not enough to buy it over other phones on the market.

    10. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't tell anyone, but... those Star Wars fans, Lord of the Rings fans, iPhone fans... they're all the same people. They're a hired group of actors who inflate the perceived popularity of a product. Wow. I never knew tax payers are hiring Philadelphian Mayor John Street to inflate the popularity of the iPhone. When Steve Jobs said the reason he chose 6pm for the release was that he didn't want people taking from work. He was really saying he didn't want them take off work because he wanted them to be in work. Their work is to buy the wiretapped iPhone and spread Apple's (so-called America) dominance over the world. muwahahaha!
    11. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what have you saved by waiting in line for hours to get the phone instead of getting it next week with no lineups?

      In other words, you completely missed the point of the post.

    12. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never really understood the mentality of lining up outside the store or the theater in order to get something or see something at the earliest possible moment. Can someone please explain this whole phenomenon to me?

      I'm terminally ill and only have days to live, you insensitive clod!

    13. Re:Not troll, I swear by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      If you haven't already done so, try picking up an Sony Ericsson some time. The UI is slick, fast, intuitive, and feels like it's always one step ahead of you. Makes Symbian seem like a series of band-aid solutions sitting on top of an operating system that seemed like a good idea at the time.

    14. Re:Not troll, I swear by shmlco · · Score: 1

      So you've never cared enough about a movie, play, or concert to be willing to stand in line for a few extra minutes in order to see it first? Never been passionate enough about something to want the first new kind of car or bike or computer or golf club or snowboard or whatever it is you're into? Never wanted to be the first to know something?

      Sorry, but THAT doesn't seem normal to me. And it's not a putdown or anything, but I also think it's a bit sad...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    15. Re:Not troll, I swear by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "Don't tell anyone, but... those Star Wars fans, Lord of the Rings fans, iPhone fans... they're all the same people."

      Ah... that's probably truer than you think.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    16. Re:Not troll, I swear by discord5 · · Score: 1

      This is probably a troll, but I'll bite.

      No, it's not crazy. Why did I (and thousands of others) stand line up for hours? If you would like a hint, pick up an iPhone and try to exploit its advertised features.

      And the difference between standing in line and not standing in line would be what exactly? I believe the point would be that you can buy an iPhone, today, tomorrow, next week, next month and if it's still popular by then next year, without having to stand in line wasting perfectly good time.

      The amount of time I spent in line is dwarfed by the amount of time I spend trying to learn how to use a fraction of the advertised features of whatever cellphone a plan offers me.

      The amount of time I didn't spend in line was replaced by actual useful activities such as spending time with my family, doing a job, and having a drink with my friends. I've still got one of those "no nonsense" phones, without camera, e-mail, internet, gimmicks and widgets. I personally don't see the use of all those features on a cellphone, since I use it for two things: calling people and sending text messages.

      I don't really see the use in having all those extras. I've got a digital camera that'll dwarf any phones built in camera, so if I need to take pictures of something I'll drag it along. I've got a laptop that I use for internet access, so I don't really need to have a phone that can access my e-mail or website. If people have an urgent message for me, they'll call me regardless of me having e-mail everywhere.

      Life is too short to memorize arbitrary menu navigation.

      Life is too short to stand in line for a phone, no matter how easily navigatable it is.

    17. Re:Not troll, I swear by unapersson · · Score: 1

      It's funny you should say that, I've just finished reading that Ray Bradbury short story "The Crowd". It's about a guy who is a car accident who realises that the crowd that gathers around accidents is always the same core group of people with a few normal hangers on.

    18. Re:Not troll, I swear by UnxMully · · Score: 1

      Series 60 turned me off Nokia phones completely, so much so that I won't buy one that uses it regardless of any claimed benefits. I now have a K800i which I know isn't a smartphone but you're right, it's a very good UI and very usable. Although oddly there seems to be no way to enter flight mode other than by powering off and on again, though being as I'm with Orange it could be hidden under the bastardised front-end they always seem to stick on phones.

      However, I just watched the iPhone video from Apple and in terms of usability and integration of applications its a long way ahead of anything on the market from any other vendor. OK, so it was a video demo which is bound not to show you any of the downsides that you'd find with general usage but as a package the whole thing looks very well integrated.

      I may just have to look at one when they come to the UK. Which means that I'll probably end up buying one. Even if the price plans are similar to those in the US, although they're bound not to be. I just hope it's not on Orange.

    19. Re:Not troll, I swear by NateTech · · Score: 1

      First you say it's not "normal", then you praise "smart companies" who acknowledge it.

      By your own admission, it's normal. Sad, but normal.

      I agree with your assessment that it's not rational.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    20. Re:Not troll, I swear by Samdroid · · Score: 1

      I've never waited in line to buy a product as soon as it was released, yet I have waited in line for films.

      Let's look at the film "Snakes on a plane". Going to see it as soon as possible means that the other people in the screen will most likely be enthusiastic about seeing the film. Everyone will cheer or boo etc. at the same time adding to the atmosphere. Going to see if a few days afterwards removes this and for me would make it less exciting.

    21. Re:Not troll, I swear by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should've said YMMV.

      I upgraded my phone to an HTC TyTN about 8 months ago. Now, for the record I owned an old iPaq 3855 which I'd put Linux on five years ago so I at least had some practice with WinMo... but I was at least 5 years "rusty" or more. I received the phone during a day when I was going out to dinner with my family that night. My wife bought the phone down to me as we met at the restaurant. No sooner had I got my paws on it than I had opened the box, flipped the SIM from my existing phone and played with it while we waited for a table.

      By the time we sat down for dinner (about a 30 minute wait or thereabouts; it was a Friday at a seafood restaurant in a Catholic town... go figure) I had already become comfortable with the advertised features, sent at least two text messages, set up my IMAP account to receive my mail and made a phone call. 30 minutes... OK... I played with it for a further hour or so after I got out of the restaurant, but I already had the basic functions down. I just played with it because it was a new toy.

      The key thing is that afterward, I installed applications to *augment the functionality*, something you really can't do with the iPhone. No, the web apps don't count; I can use web apps on my HTC TyTN and do so often (gmail, yahoo mail, google calendar etc.), and it's a much more pleasurable experience on 3G than it would be on EDGE. Plus, I use Opera... I have a choice in browsers.

      I admit, I went by my local Apple store yesterday and played with the iPhone. While I admit that the interface is slick, it's just not that impressive. I like it, I really do... but in the 15 minutes I played with it before I had to get moving (I had a party to go to last night) I navigated around, surfed some web sites on WiFi, played some tunes... all OK... but this is all stuff I can do with my TyTN... even the WiFi thing. The interface is "shiny", but lacks flexibility. I can't change the interface to fit my work flow; something I can easily do with third party apps on my TyTN. The core functions of my TyTN remain the same, but the interface is more consistent with the iGTD type workflow model; something I use to be efficient with my tools. Maybe it's not for everyone, and yes my friends who've played with it often find themselves wondering how I have it set up... but it fits my workflow and does exactly what I need it to do. And the core functions despite iPhone fans screams are never more than a single button push away because I have real physical buttons on the device. There's an email button, an Internet button and a call/hang up button. These are the core functions and they are quicker for me with the TyTN because I don't have to power on, press the menu button then tap the mail icon on the screen. Doesn't matter where I am in the TyTN's interface, if I want mail I hit the mail button. OK... I have to hit the power button as well, but that's 2/3 of the steps the iPhone requires. How's that an improvement?

      I've said for some time the iPhone's not targeted at me. After playing with one, I have to say it just reinforced that idea for me. My wife might like one (she has a Motorola SLVR that she likes, but it frustrates her sometimes)... but the iPhone costs 5 times what her SLVR cost me, and at least with her SLVR she can switch out cards for theoretically unlimited MP3 storage (though recently I gave her an iPod Nano for music... better interface)

    22. Re:Not troll, I swear by Bemopolis · · Score: 1

      For the record:

      I stood in line for two hours. The difference between standing in line and not standing in line was getting to talk to other like-minded people.

      My family lives 1000 miles away; so I spend time with them by using a (wait for it) cellphone. I don't have a job yet, as we moved here a few months ago because the "wife" got a better job. As for her and our friends, they were all at work. Which is why I had TWO WHOLE HOURS OF FREE TIME to stand in line.

      As for phones being "no-nonsense", all I ask is that a phone make calls AND sync with my computer, so I don't have to spend more time than I did in line typing in all of my numbers. Of the last three phones I have had, only one has been able to do that, and I've had it for three days.

      So why did I waste perfectly good time standing in line? So that the "wife" could have an iPhone to take with her on her business trips instead of lugging her camera and laptop with her, and now she can email me from anywhere, save while on the plane. I got it for her on Friday so that she would have the whole weekend to have it set up before work on Monday. The fact that it took fifteen minutes was a pleasant surprise; meanwhile, I'm still trying to figure out the shortest menu navigation on my phone to check voicemail (I'd like to keep it under five, but who knows.) And, as a bonus we're with the same cell company now, so we save money overall.

      So let's see: I spent two hours in line talkng to friendly strangers to get a phone to make life easier for the woman I love. Wow, I AM a selfish, time-wasting, family-hating prick. Thank you, kind sir, for freely giving your informed judgements about other people's lives.

      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    23. Re:Not troll, I swear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice to set yourself little manageable goals every now and then, and reward yourself with something nice occasionally.

      Maybe 20 years ago this sort of thing would have been about rewarding yourself. Actually, no, I take that back - most people in the mid-80s weren't even comfortable with the idea of carrying a credit card much less spending hundreds of dollars on a phone. It would have been something you might see on a night time soap or a movie about mythical yuppies.

      Waiting in line to watch a new movie is vastly different from waiting in line to make your life in total worse off in order to keep up with the Joneses or get something pretty that you'll throw away in 2 years. It's not about rewarding yourself now, it's about entitlement. If you have money, spend it. If you don't have money, get a loan. For how many people is making this type of purchase going to be exactly counterproductive to one of the biggest stressors in life - financial security and retirement? And yet, when this pretty brick is tossed away in a couple of years they'll likely be out buying another similarly extravagant item.

    24. Re:Not troll, I swear by Hitchcock_Blonde · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely nothing wrong or abnormal about getting excited about something. I think it's more abnormal not to get excited about something you want or believe in, whether it be a phone, computer, car, home or finding a cure for cancer or AIDS or helping the homeless. Why limit your enthusiasm? Makes life that much more fun and exciting.

      --
      Karma Schmarma
    25. Re:Not troll, I swear by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Didn't you ever notice that these campout events never coincide? Don't tell anyone, but... those Star Wars fans, Lord of the Rings fans, iPhone fans... they're all the same people. They're a hired group of actors who inflate the perceived popularity of a product. All other victims of the consequent group think then aren't insane; they're just conformists. I've been told (by a friend who lived there for a few years) that in Japan it's not at all uncommon for a company to hire people for precisely this purpose.

      Can anyone from Japan confirm or deny?
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    26. Re:Not troll, I swear by leonem · · Score: 1

      I fully agree that it's sad, but while it isn't fully rational, it might be at least partially so.

      No human is fully rational, so it sometimes pays to be rational about your irrationality. If you just can't help wanting something that badly, it might be more rational to indulge yourself than to get all depressed not buying it. Of course, it means you're lacking in willpower, but hey, maybe you've learned to accept that, too!

      Once you start talking about being completely rational, you should really get down to brass tacks and justify your continued existence before making any other decision. Since I've not seen a justification for our existence that more than a minority agree with (unless you allow 'god wishes it' without specifying which god - surely cheating), I don't think it's a great way to operate.

    27. Re:Not troll, I swear by leonem · · Score: 1

      As with anything, it's horses for courses to some extent. I switched from Nokia to Sony many years ago (back when phone interfaces were all simple and often elegant). I eventually found the Sony interface was getting too awkward, and went back to Nokia hoping for something as intuitive as I used to have.

      I totally agree that S60 is a bad tradeoff between complexity and flexibility as compared with Nokia's older phones, but I prefer it to Sony's for the tasks I do most.

      Here's hoping the iPhone really does combine offer a better combination of the two. I'm also in the UK, and echo your comment about Orange. I'd love it if they'd pair with Virgin and actually have a chance of delivering okay customer service (IMO). Jobs and Branson both appear to be value-driven entrepeneurs - Jobs always keen on elegance, Branson on great customer service, niether of them necessarily doing things other people can't, but always doing it differently. They don't always hit the target (G4 Cube, Virgin TV/broadband horror stories I've come across, although that may be due to underlying infrastructure issues), but at least they're driving improvement in unusual directions.

    28. Re:Not troll, I swear by NateTech · · Score: 1

      LOL... careful, you'll make someone suicidal!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    29. Re:Not troll, I swear by UnxMully · · Score: 1

      Anyone would be better than Orange. From stolen credit card details (two cards of my wife's over three weeks, the second the replacement for the first) to price-match that doesn't and outrageous data charges.

      I really do need to switch.

  18. American Psycho meets American Kitsch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's a fucking phone that quite frankly, you will care NOTHING about in 6 months because the Next OMGHI2U Best Thing is being trotted out by Father Materialism. How many more bits of consumerism must you buy before you realize you are the latest in a sad parade of chumps who lined up to buy Marco Polo's tea from the Orient, tulips in Sweden, Pet Rocks in the 70s, Cabbage Patch Dolls in the 80s, Nintendo 64s in the 70s, and now this. Will your life truly be complete because you now own the most overpriced phone of the moment? Or is this just the latest fix?

    It's moments like this that truly make Islam look sane.

    1. Re:American Psycho meets American Kitsch. by tehredeemer · · Score: 1

      You make many good points! Unfortunately the original poster sounds like a baby ... it is sad to observe the consumerism degrade common sense to such an extent, but there it is. One thing, tough, the only way we can consider "Islam sane" is if we start encouraging the said poster (cry-baby) to blow himself up in front of AT$T store. I don't think we have reached the level of insanity and mental degradation that is promulgated by religious fanatics around the world. Regards.

    2. Re:American Psycho meets American Kitsch. by danbeck · · Score: 4, Funny

      I call bullshit. Nintendo never had a widely popular console until the mid 80's and for that matter, the Nintendo 64 wasn't sold until 1996. I can't take you seriously until you get your facts straight.

      This is slashdot and the facts are important, Sir!

  19. Re:I Might Be Interested if AT&T Wasn't Involv by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

    Dang - use preview! I meant customer records - not employee. Sigh.

  20. I agree by Aurisor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Day one revealed what all Apple aficionados fear. That AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone."

    This post is not intended as a flame or some kind of universal truth...just my own experiences and observations.

    I have purchased 4 ipods thus far (2 for myself and 2 as gifts). I bought my mother a mac mini for her birthday. I think Apple is the most innovative company in consumer electronics right now. I have disposable income and I like spending my money on gizmos.

    I live in Boston. I had Cingular / AT&T for four years and verizon for three. I had terrible reception and frequent dropped calls with Cingular and nearly none (in the same place) with Verizon.

    Based on my personal experiences I'm going to wait until I can use the iphone with another carrier.

    You guys can't bash Apple for this shit, though. A few huge corporations have a stranglehold on the cellular networks in this country, and they're more than willing to keep selling you the same service they've always been pushing as long as they possibly can. Apple had to cut a deal with one of the providers, and why would the market leaders push a product which will force them to offer new features, expand their network, and increase consumer expectations? Thus we get this Apple / AT&T deal.

    Bottom line, iphone early adopters are going to have to suffer with a second-best carrier for six months to a year or so, at which point other companies (assuming the thing hasn't flopped) will start making the modifications to support the iphone's data-dependent features. Cell phone carriers that aren't leading the market won't change a thing unless they think it's going to gain them market share, and ones that are won't change a thing unless they're already losing it. It's just the way the game works.

    1. Re:I agree by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Exactly what new features does the iPhone need on a network?

      Everything the iPhone can do, my phone (a $70 camera phone) can do theoretically (it doesn't actually have the processing power for much of it, though...) And, my provider offers sockets access, no need for HTTP proxies.

      And, Apple could have easily sold the phone unlocked, ready to pop a SIM card in from your favorite GSM carrier (of course, in this country, that's AT&T or T-Mobile...)

    2. Re:I agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Exactly what new features does the iPhone need on a network? The iPhone needs the provider to support visual voicemail. As far as I can tell, this requires the voicemail system to embed the message ID for the new message in the SMS notifying the phone of waiting voicemail, as well as the calling number, so that the phone can skip directly to that message when it's clicked. It's not a big change, but it is a change.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  21. now everyone goes to the Apple store by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

    I almost have to wonder if Jobs really "misspoke" or if this was a beautiful way to declare early on that "you get your iPhone from Apple". Hey while you're in the Apple store get some extra iPod stuff or go look at a new laptop.

    --
    We are all just people.
  22. I would answer by Target+Practice · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I'm too busy waiting in line for Transformers.

    --
    There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
    1. Re:I would answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So, which tracker are you using? :-)

    2. Re:I would answer by gsn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kids these days - lining up for the latest fad... I'm still first in line for Duke Nukem Forever at the Electronic Boutique at the mall - I lined up when it was announced back in '97... They tried to trick me by changing the name of the store a few years back but I'm still in line and no one is gonna cut in front of me. Any day now... I'll go back home and upgrade my old P266 that it was supposed to work on and then I can play this great new game! Now if only the mall people would stop thinking I'm a janitor...

      --
      Reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled.
    3. Re:I would answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too funny :D. If only I had mod points!

  23. At&t worked for me by bobm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did the AT&T line thing from around noon on and it went well. They had around 60 8G units and I was around #40 so my wait was worth it.

    Quite a few people were holding places for bosses, parents and spouses. Most of the people seemed to be Mac users. Everyone was in a good mood and it made the time pass.

    The Store was great, good attitudes all the way around, I gave them a credit card they gave me a phone. Can't get much easier than that. They told us ahead of time that the # accessories was limited and tried to set expectations. We were told ahead of time that they would only sell one phone per person which I think really helped.

    Online activation was easy, note that I'm a current AT&T customer so that may account for something.

    The phone is nice and it's easier to learn to type on than doing Graffiti (sp) on my old Treo. The edge works as I expected (note: I spend a lot of time in a non-3G area so that wasn't a problem). The voice quality is good according to friends I've talked to.

    For those out there that don't like it, don't buy one. Most of the arguments against it (it's going to cost $$$ over 2 years, like I won't have a phone otherwise) are just silly but such is the world it seems.

    Of course, today my Nokia 770 arrived (from the Woot last week) so now I have two toys to play with...

    1. Re:At&t worked for me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      The whole 3G thing is grossly overblown.

      In addition to the limited and unreliable networks for US GSM providers and the reasons given about power consumption, physical size, and everything else, people should remember this: In 2006, only ~20% of European cell phone sales were 3G-capable. Europe has a vastly superior and widely available 3G network essentially everywhere. They have the ubiquity there that GPRS has here--and European consumers are only slowly easing into it even several years into the "future" (by American standards).

      They have several years before 3G even makes a difference here. The iPhone will be obsolete in countless other ways by then. It's not as though having 3G would mean that people would realistically keep it longer. The tiny percentage of people who care immensely about 3G in the US are almost completely overlapping that segment of people who replace their Treo annually anyway.

    2. Re:At&t worked for me by prockcore · · Score: 1

      In addition to the limited and unreliable networks for US GSM providers and the reasons given about power consumption


      Only for GSM. EVDO uses less power than 1x.
    3. Re:At&t worked for me by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In 2006, only ~20% of European cell phone sales were 3G-capable. Do you mean phones, or phone sales? I wouldn't be surprised if you meant phones, since there is a huge installed base of mobile phones. I would if you meant phone sales; I got my current phone near the end of 2005. It was free with a cheap contract, and supports UMTS (3G). I use it when I'm travelling as a bluetooth modem so my laptop can connect to the Internet. As I recall, when I was shopping (here in the UK), around half of the phones on offer supported 3G.

      I probably won't upgrade my current phone for a while; data access if fast enough, and 1GB of storage (32MB built in, 1GB on an RS-MMC I picked up for $20 a year later on a trip to the US) seems adequate for now.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:At&t worked for me by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Phone sales. For example, when you bought your phone in 2005, only 12% of people buying phones bought 3G phones. Source. Admittedly this particular source is referring only to WCDMA, but it makes a solid reference for the year in question. 2006 year-long (not quarterly) sales were on the order of 21-23% 3G according to a trade journal article that I can't seem to find at the moment. Lots of phones offered 3G, but consumers don't really use it, even on a worldwide scale. Here's a link from the same site referencing newer figures (though I trust this site less than my trade journals). 20% global 3G handset owners, 9% use.

  24. Original source by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The original comment was Jobs saying in passing to someone, that they woudl have "a better chance" at an AT&T store. That turned out to be wrong, but to my recollection there was never an official annoncement saying AT&T stores were the place to go.

    You already knew everything you needed to know about which store being faster, based on how they operate day to day. I know; I went into an AT&T store a day or two before. Just a few cash registers? Simple math says throughput will be low, compared to how Apple handles transactions every day with emplyess that roam with checkout machines - whcih can be added along with more employees. AT&T simply cannot add more registers as easily.

    Now, I do think AT&T employees should have been better about informaing the line as to what was going on - Apple store employees are great that way, and were really working the line I was in. But there again, you can go into stores ahead of time and judge the quality of line servicing you will get just by daily interaction with regular visitors.

    I odn't think AT&T should get jabbed too hard for basically being like any other retail outlet, caught in a tidal wave they could ill comprehend. Instead this is an opportunity to realize just how good Apple store eomployees are, that they seem happy with the job and are also well prepared for epic sales events such as this one.

    I filled out the feedback on my Apple store receipt commending the people that work there - I think if other people had a good experience, they should do the same and let Apple know just how special the front line employee base they've managed to grow really is!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Original source by nsayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, I do think AT&T employees should have been better about informaing the line as to what was going on

      But if people at the end of the line know that the store is out of iPhones, they might go somewhere else and the store employees would not get their commission. Their goal was to try and get people still in line after they ran out to place orders to get iPhones shipped to them (again, so they could get the commission). Someone familiar with Apple stores will have to confirm whether or not Apple store employees are on commission or not, but I would speculate that any difference in behavior could be attributed to them not getting commissions.

      Salesmen on commission simply can never be counted on to act in the customer's interest in any way.

    2. Re:Original source by Babbster · · Score: 1

      Salesmen on commission simply can never be counted on to act in the customer's interest in any way.

      Amen! Because no salesman working on commission has ever made a ton of money off repeat business from satisfied customers.

      Cell phone providers overall are trying to screw you out of your money. They want you to buy the most expensive phone possible (even if you really don't need the features) and they want you to buy the most expensive plan possible (even if you might only talk on the phone for an hour or two per month). In that situation, yes, salespeople on commission tend to stop caring, in large part because satisfying the customer can end up being entirely out of their hands, dependent on customer service phone reps and overall company policy. That, however, is not the case in every business, and I'm sure there are innumerable car salespeople (for example) who will tell you that making the customer happy is key to maintaining their lifestyle.
    3. Re:Original source by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Amen! Because no salesman working on commission has ever made a ton of money off repeat business from satisfied customers. I'd say this is probably true of mobile phones. Most have a minimum contract of 12 months, meaning that the most frequently customers would come back is once a year. I think most people upgrade their phone, on average, around once every two years, some a lot less frequently. How many store-floor employees in mobile phone shops expect to be around in two years, and expect their customers to remember their face? Remember, it doesn't benefit them personally if the customer comes back and buys a phone from a different sales rep.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Original source by Babbster · · Score: 1

      That's all fine, and in those specific instances I have no problem with the criticism. My point was only that sales on commission should not be dismissed as being bad for the customer. In fact, it can be good for the customer since the service s/he receives can actually be improved by the desire of the salesperson to get continued business.

      I would also ask the GP this pretty simple question: Would the service at a cell phone store improve if they offered their employees no sales commissions? I don't think it would since there would still be mandates to push particular items, and I think you'd reduce the intelligence of the employees because the people (even if they're only there for the short-term) who are smart and motivated enough to do better than the average will just find someplace else to work.

      I often wonder if the people who complain the loudest about salespeople working on commission are those who are just jealous of the good ones who make "the big bucks."

    5. Re:Original source by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Amen! Because no salesman working on commission has ever made a ton of money off repeat business from satisfied customers. In my experience, no, they haven't.

      I have bought things more than once from the same store (as a notable example, the AT&T nee' Cingular store in question), but I typically don't get the same salesman twice in a row, and in any event my satisfaction is in spite of such salesmen universally trying to pad the deal with crap I don't want. This goes for cars, TVs, everything. I am thinking of getting a custom T-shirt that says, "No, I don't want the extended warranty."

  25. Pretty good idea... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I like the WiFi from the EvDO laptop - pretty good idea. The iPhone is easier to manage in a car than a laptop, for sure.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. iWait with my iBrick by TheBigDuck · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I bought an iPhone at 7:30 pm on Friday at the Apple store in Lake Grove, NY. I waited on NO LINE, and walked out with an iPhone within 5 minutes. I was happy.

    At 9:30 pm, I started the activation process using iTunes. An existing AT & T customer, I figured this would be no issue. I was wrong.

    I saw the dreaded, "Your activation requires additional time to complete." and waited. and waited and waited.

    I was told the following fun things from AT & T customer service:
    • The activation will take 2 to 8 hours.
    • We are overwhelmed with the activations of the iPhone (this, I believe).
    • "Relax yourself" (to be fair, the Jamaican Customer service guy was very nice).
    • 3.3 Million iPhones were sold and there are NO more iPhones to be had. Activating all these iPhones is overloading us. (I called the Apple Store in Lake Grove, and still have 8 gig iPhones, but supplies are running out.)
    • Leave your iTunes ON and the iPhone plugged in, or the activation will not work.
    • You DO NOT have to leave your iTunes on, but the FINAL activation will require iTunes.
    • The problem is on Apple's end, with the activations.
    • We can see you in the queue sir, but we can't bump you up.


    I was sent an e-mail from AT & T giving me an order number. When I mentioned to customer service that number, I was told, "That number doesn't really mean anything to us."

    It's 10:34 pm on Saturday night, and my iPhone is still an iBrick.
    1. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Toonol · · Score: 1

      3.3 Million iPhones were sold and there are NO more iPhones to be had. Activating all these iPhones is overloading us. (I called the Apple Store in Lake Grove, and still have 8 gig iPhones, but supplies are running out.)


      Hmm, I'm skeptical of that number. That would be nearly 1% of the population of the United states. I don't think one in every hundred people [men/women/children] owns an iPhone. I would be surprised if they sold more than a million.


      But then, I'm overly skeptical.

    2. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.3 Million iPhones were sold and there are NO more iPhones to be had. Activating all these iPhones is overloading us. (I called the Apple Store in Lake Grove, and still have 8 gig iPhones, but supplies are running out.)
      No f-ing way Apple sold 3.3M iPhones yesterday. The logistic would be a nightmare and the math doesn't add up. Let's say each AT&T store gets and average of 100 iPhones, so you get 1,800*100 = 180,000. That leaves Apple selling 3.12M. Consider that the online Apple Store will ship the iPhone in 2-4 weeks, safe to say the online store doesn't sell any iPhones. So, on average each Apple Store sells 3.12M/180 = 17.3K from 6:00 p.m. to 10 p.m. That is the iPhone was sold at a rate of 1.2 iPhones per second at each Apple Store.

      I don't see that happening.
    3. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better yet, that's about 1.65 billion dollars in... 3 hours?

      1. Announce a cell phone, like it was the last thing you can have on earth. 2. Generate lots of expectations, and inflate the ego of many people out there. 3. Make them believe that phone will increase their status, an make them wait like they are regular people (Uhm... well they are). 4. ... 5. Profit!

    4. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "3.3 Million iPhones were sold and there are NO more iPhones to be had."

      Believe that nonsense, and you'll believe anything. The current US population according to the census.gov POPClock is 302,226,998. If 3,300,000 people have bought the iPhone already, that would mean almost 1.1% of the entire US population felt the need not only to purchase the iPhone, but to do so by queuing on the very first day of sales.

      Given that there are only 233 million mobile phone subscribers in the US in total (December 2006 figures from CTIA), it would also mean that either the total US mobile phone market just grew by up to 1.4% in one day, or up to 1.4% of all mobile phone users in the US felt the need to switch to an iPhone on the very first day (or of course, some combination of these two possibilities).

      Further given that AT&T has only 62.2 million mobile phone subscribers in the US in total (March 2007 figures from AT&T), it would also mean that AT&T's market share grew by up to 5%+ in a single day, or up to 5%+ of all existing AT&T subscribers felt the need to buy iPhones on the first day, or some combination of these two possibilities.

      You've been fed a line by a support rep who was making up excuses for their tardiness, and you took it hook, line and sinker.

    5. Re:iWait with my iBrick by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      It's not so simple. Yeah, the CSR probably screwed up, since I think what s/he actually meant is that there were about 3 million iPhones *manufactured* according to most sources online. Still, we have no way of knowing how many people placed online orders yesterday, and sales were clearly quite strong in retail locations, though there are some left on Apple store shelves.

      There may only be 233 million subscribers, but each and every day in 2006, 2.7 million phones were sold on average. 2007 numbers can reasonably be expected to be higher, and that the iPhone launch would be higher-than-average in volume isn't that far of a stretch. So it's entirely possible that 1 or 2 million iPhones were sold yesterday since it would probably be an otherwise-slow day for cell phone sales.

      Once you get that high, whether it's 500,000 or 2 million, there's probably not an activation system in the world that could handle that gracefully. It also wouldn't make sense to invest in tremendously increased capacity for such a short spike time.

    6. Re:iWait with my iBrick by macsimcon · · Score: 1

      We purchased two iPhones on Friday night. No one tells you that if you're not a current AT&T customer, and you're not transferring a phone number from another carrier, you'll need to "pre-qualify" _in person_ at an AT&T store. Naturally, this was inconvenient, but we did it. By Saturday afternoon, one of the iPhones was activated, but it's now Sunday morning, and the other one still isn't activated.

      They could have explained this procedure when we purchased the phones, but even the support people at AT&T don't know what's going on; they can't seem to give us a consistent answer, other than to ask us to wait. Well, it's been 36 hours since we first activated online, and still nothing. It doesn't seem possible that AT&T's activation system is still overwhelmed a day and a half later.

    7. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There may only be 233 million subscribers, but each and every day in 2006, 2.7 million phones were sold on average."

      Once again confirming the numbers he was quoted to be complete and utter BS. 2.7 million phones of ALL manufacturers would sell on an average day just six months ago, and you believe that Apple outsells that single-handed by over 20%?

      Personally, I don't believe for one second that they broke a million, and more than likely the actual number of iPhones sold on the first day was sub-500k.

    8. Re:iWait with my iBrick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://money.cnn.com/2007/07/02/technology/iphone_ sales/?postversion=2007070207 ...and now we have independent estimates confirming I'm right. iPhone's estimated opening *weekend* sales are believed to be around 500,000. That's for Friday evening, all of Saturday, and all of Sunday. In other words, sales in the first 24 hours are likely to be 300,000 or below, even if you assume there was a fairly solid initial spike.

      So - the quoted 3.3 million 24-hour sales figure is over ten times the number actually sold.

  27. Coverage with Sprint is good... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have Sprint and the coverage is very good. In fact that is the main reason I have them. I'm sorry to say that their human service sucks though. I can get in network coverage anywhere anybody I know gets coverage, usually better quality but when it comes time to call and talk to a person it always sucks.

    AC to avoid blowing mod points

  28. 1870s barronrobbers & 1970s hippies by kungfoolery · · Score: 1

    This is a marriage made in 'only convenient because we have no other choice but pretty ugly in every other sense' land. AT&T does and continues to do things that require the least amount of R&D expenditure from their revenues. Despite the fact that their entire infrastructure is generations past even medially-edged; they continue to squeeze their creaky old steam-powered communications lines to the last buffalo cent. The Intarweb boom left them in the dust and their cellular network is a collection of cans and strings compared to what countries in Asia and Europe are used to.

    This, partnered with a leading development/IT company borne in the age of 'assimilate, ditch, reinvent, rinse, or die' company culture? Apple is a company all about rewriting itself (for better or worse)--constantly changing lest the market eat them alive; whereas AT&T is from an era of monolithic monopolistic control and change when they damn well feel like getting around to it.

    Not terribly surprising that these differences manifest themselves even at the retail level

  29. And you think AT&T is bad.... by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

    Rogers/Fido, Bell and Telus up in Canada make AT&T look competent and benign.

    Rogers data plans : http://www.shoprogers.com/store/wireless/services/ voice/navigate-mobile-internet.asp?

    Bell data plan examples: http://www.bell.ca/shopping/en_CA_AB/PrsShpWls_Rtp IRPList.page?wlcs_catalog_category_id=TreoPocketPC RatePlans

    Telus data plan examples: http://www.telusmobility.com/ab/plans/pcs/talkemai l_all.shtml

    Couple those rates with service that is slightly less friendly than AT&T's.

    --
    ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
  30. Works for me by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I don't think everyone else on earth should stay away from something because one person has a problem.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  31. Spelling error by slimey_limey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hate to nitpick, but it's no longer "AT&T". It's now "at&t", the new softer, friendlier telephone company.

    1. Re:Spelling error by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      on my iPhone, it has "AT&T" on the top row, not the softy lowercase version

      fyi for those keeping track, 20 minute wait at the at&t store in Allentown pa.

      --
      mod me funny
  32. Technically speaking ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    we're really referring to SBC, not AT&T. The AT&T of old was, if nothing else, highly competent at running a phone system. SBC, on the other hand, doesn't do much of anything well except suction wallets dry. And SBC is the new AT&T.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Technically speaking ... by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      The AT&T would not allow even a non-AT&T phone to be connected to your home phone socket as they claimed it would disrupt their network somehow.
      And phones were rented to you at $4.85 per month.
      Yes they were brutally efficient. If you want lock-in, they are the man to go.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Technically speaking ... by VGPowerlord · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, we're referring to AT&T, as the new AT&T consists of four of the seven Bell regional holding companies, plus the main corporation.

      I'm ignoring Cingular because it was created by two of the four Bell regional holding companies mentioned above.

      --
      GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
  33. My Similar experience. by tji · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had a similar bad experience with AT&T and good experience with Apple:

    Executive summary
    - AT&T Mgr. refused to give basic information (do you have enough iPhones for all 20 people in line?)
    - AT&T Mgr. lied about availability (iPhones are sold out all through the city)
    - AT&T Mgr. intentionally tries to hide Apple Store availability to get more sales for his store.
    - AT&T screwed up the order for the first guy in line, who had been waiting for hours. By the time he realized they gave him a 4GB phone, there were no 8GB units left.
    - Apple store had many iPhones. Completed quick, easy, efficient transaction.

    The long version:

    I wasn't about to wait in lines for more than 15-30 minutes, but I headed up to the closest AT&T/Cingular store which was in an area I thought might not get a lot of traffic (Kalamazoo Rd & Hwy 6, Grand Rapids, MI). There were about 20 people waiting in line at 5:55PM, so I joined in.

    The AT&T rep came out and asked for a show of hands on how many people wanted 4GB vs 8GB. Almost everyone wanted 8GB, and by his grimace I saw that was going to be a problem. I asked him how many phones they had, and he said "I can't tell you that". I persisted, asking if it was worth while for those of us near the end to wait. He said "if we run out, we can process the order and direct ship to your home". So, now his intention was obvious.. keep as many people there as possible, and try to get more sales even after running out of phones. There were 4 or 5 employees, but for some reason they only allowed two people to enter the store at a time, and the transactions seemed to take forever.

    Against my better judgment, I stayed in line. About 45 minutes later, they had slowly processed 10-15 people ahead of me. One of the earlier people came out and said they had run out. Shortly after that, the first guy in line returned. He had bought an 8GB iPhone and later found that they had given him a 4GB unit. Now all the 8GB units were gone.. The manager came out and asked if anyone in the line was paying cash and wanted a 4GB unit. One guy jumped at this, and they took his money, gave it to the first guy, and gave the cash guy the iPhone. Kinda shady to avoid a return..

    The AT&T people said that no other stores in the city had iPhones left. (I had already tried to call the Apple store to see their status, but couldn't get through.) And they said they would do free next day shipping, and claimed that ordering in the store would be faster than online. I am in Eastern time zone, and I thought the online purchases might be closed until 6PM Pacific. So, I went ahead and ordered it there. The guy taking my order seemed like he had never used the sales system before, and it took 5+ minutes to complete my sale.

    Shortly before I got in the AT&T store, some guy walked up and asked why we (the four remaining laggards) were waiting in line. He said "there's no lines at the Apple store at the mall, and they have plenty left". We had all seen coverage of the campers at the Apple store on last night's news, so we thought he was messing with us, or trying to get us to give up our spots in line.

    On the off chance he was telling the truth, I drove over to the mall. There were a lot of people milling around the store, fondling the iPhones on display. I asked an employee if they had any left, and he pointed to the rows of iPhone bags behind the genius desk and registers.. there were over a hundred there on the floor. I picked up an 8GB iPhone, the Apple employees were plentiful, helpful, and efficient. The purchase took all of 40 seconds. Ithen zipped back over to the AT&T store to void my earlier transaction.

    They voided my iPhone order without argument (I was a bit surprised at that). I explained to the manager that he was incorrect when he told me that there were no more iPhones in the city, and told him of the hundreds at the Apple store. He quickly called another AT&T store and began comparing notes with someone there.

    1. Re:My Similar experience. by kabz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I dropped by the att store in the Woodlands and they were sold out and tried to get me to 'pre-order'. I drove up to the Apple store in the Woodlands mall and picked up an 8 Gig in about 4 minutes. It kind of looks like Apple shorted att a bit on quantity, but the experience at the Apple store was awesome. Everyone looked to be having a great time, whereas the att store was deserted. Actually, there were about 20 people between 5 parallel lines at the Apple checkout, and 2 or 3 deep round the iPhone demo area.

      I got mine home, and had it activated and working in about 5 minutes. The phone and browsing, and the iPod bits are all fantastic. It totally exceeds expectations, which is kinda sad, since like an iPod, all it really does is *not suck*. All the technology in the iPhone has been in place for about the last 5 years give or take.

      The only glitch I have so far is that it refuses to re-authenticate correctly to my WEP wireless which drags. It'll get on, then if I turn off, I have to 'forget this network' and put the key in again. I'm hoping there will be an update that fixes this.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    2. Re:My Similar experience. by Animats · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Apple is favoring its own stores over shipping product to AT&T outlets. Don't blame AT&T for that.

    3. Re:My Similar experience. by rhizome · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Apple is favoring its own stores over shipping product to AT&T outlets. Don't blame AT&T for that.

      He can certainly blame the manager who wouldn't tell him the quantity available and lied about other stores not having them.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
    4. Re:My Similar experience. by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Needless to say, I was not impressed by the Cingular/AT&T people. They were typical of most subscription sales organizations I've run into. They just seemed slimy, and clearly had little concern for their customers, as long as they got their commission. AT&T employees are NOT getting commissions on any iPhone sales. Blame Apple for that one...
      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    5. Re:My Similar experience. by dcam · · Score: 1

      However you can blame AT & T for their reaction to that.

      --
      meh
    6. Re:My Similar experience. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's your point? Should we feel sorry for AT&T employees? Adding commission would do nothing but make their customer service worse, because they would be even more motivated to lie to customers.

      Given the behavior that many have described, it is clear that they were motivated to increase their sales - at the expense of other outlets for the iPhones and any customer convenience. So, maybe it wasn't a direct commission, but they were looking out for themselves over customers.

  34. WRONG WRONG WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company in reality is the Cingular entity, who now call themselves AT&T, by virtue of buying AT&T.

  35. Who thought the iTunes Activation Deal up? by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Why did they not have the iPod and other non cellular functions work without activation? Also, why activate through iTunes? I mean these 2 things means you are really leaving the store with something that does not work. Also, the stupid phone is locked to the hilt ot not even accept a AT&T SIM from another phone. It can only use the sim that it comes with and THAT sim CAN be used in other phones. Mornic. Glad I am not buying one.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Who thought the iTunes Activation Deal up? by spinkham · · Score: 1

      My guess? They've been building out the hardware (nothing unusually great in there) for a long time before the software was done, and want to be able to keep working on it until launch day. Therefore, they needed to download the firmware to everyone's cell at the last minute. This would overwhelm AT&T's sucky data network, so apple had you update it through itunes on your own internet connection.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    2. Re:Who thought the iTunes Activation Deal up? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Apple made AT&T sign a revenue-sharing deal for their exclusive on the iPhone. This means Apple gets a cut from the money you spend on your contract and phone calls with an iPhone. If you buy one and use it as an iPod and browser with just the WiFi then they would get less money.

      I was quite surprised that the iPhone was actually a phone. I was expecting Apple to side-step the whole network issue, and make something with just WiFi, that ran iChat and let people chat or video conference whenever they were near WiFi. I assumed they would partner with Google, and sell first in areas where Google was deploying municipal WiFi connection. They could then have made even more money by acting as a VoIP to POTS bridge service.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  36. Re:Millions of Dollars of Paid For Hype For Nothin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get out much, do you? The world stood in line, jackass.

  37. Wireless Carriers by stevesabol · · Score: 1

    I've been a wireless customer of Verizon, Cingular/AT&T, and Sprint. I am currently an AT&T customer because work chose them for our crapberries. I travel *a lot* in my job. In my experience, Verizon to has the best coverage (and costs the most), followed closely by Cingular. Sprint was pretty crappy. I also found that Verizon had the worst customer service out of all of them (very very arrogant), but Sprint was very close behind (just plain rude). Also, at the time Sprint's early termination fee was the remainder of the contract. I would have kissed a manager if they let me out for $175. Through the phone. (At the time I was driving up and down the Virginia Eastern Shore and Sprint had NO coverage at all out there.)

  38. O rly? by bluemonq · · Score: 1

    I suppose it depends on who you trust. Do you trust the J.D. Power rankings?

  39. why is it a phone? by motank · · Score: 1

    they should've sold the thing without the phone feature. no one would be complaining right now

  40. I Might Be Interested if _Apple_ Wasn't Involved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm... oh... wait. Yeah... I don't care, I'm completely tired of the words "iPhone" and "Apple".

  41. Re:Millions of Dollars of Paid For Hype For Nothin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by 'the world' you mean 'androgynous hipster apple whores,' yeah...

  42. You're not competent to comment. by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While all of you morons were waiting on long lines for your iBrick, I was out listening to non-DRMed MP3's that I just copied to the flash card in my A-707 w/o having to use some god-awful buggy and inefficient middleware app.

    You mean iTunes?

    I used iTunes as the music manager for my non-iPod MP3 player: it handles non-DRM-ed MP3s just fine, and smart playlists are a really neat tool for managing your MP3 player's storage... I'm sure that they prototyped the iPod shuffle's smart shuffle that way.

    I'll agree that the iPhone is overrated and overpriced, but when I criticize Apple (or any other company) I'm doing it as someone who uses... or at least researches... the products first. Not from a position of sloganeering or ignorance.

    1. Re:You're not competent to comment. by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

      I've had mine since 6 pm on launch day, and I have to say I don't find it to be overrated at all. I can't stop fiddling around with it, but then I'm a huge technophile. As for overpriced...I would be hard priced to spend less than I did on an iphone, to get a new phone with the features I need for work, plus a new ipod, plus a wireless internet device seperately. Overpriced? Waste of money? More like saving money.

    2. Re:You're not competent to comment. by argent · · Score: 1

      I can't stop fiddling around with it, but then I'm a huge technophile.

      I used to think I was. But obviously I'm only a small technophile.

      Objectively... it doesn't have any functionality that any Pocket PC Phone Edition device released in the past several years doesn't have. It just has a better user interface than these other touch-screen phones. If that's worth it to you, then it's not a "waste of money" for you... I've got a Macbook Pro. Objectively, it's overpriced and underpowered, but I consider that the price of getting a laptop with an OS that doesn't suck... it's not a "waste of money" but I'm not going to argue that it's not overpriced.

  43. That was the "it" for me by davmoo · · Score: 1

    I'm not a big Apple fanboy, and quite honestly I don't see anything that revolutionary about the iPhone. But even so, I did take a look at getting one just because I like gadgets. But the fact that Apple went with AT&T was an instant deal breaker.

    I live out in the proverbial sticks. And as the saying goes, its the network, stupid. Where I live, T-mobile barely works, AT&T never works, but Verizon Wireless has never let me down. And while traveling in a 4-state area to service clients, Verizon Wireless is also the only one to never let me down. So for me, any answer other than "we're going with Verizon" is the wrong answer if you want me to buy your phone, and it doesn't matter how revolutionary it is. At the end of the day if I can't make a phone call, your gadget is useless, and its feature set is irrelevant.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
  44. Apple store employees are first rate. by argent · · Score: 1

    Needless to say, I was not impressed by the Cingular/AT&T people. They were typical of most subscription sales organizations I've run into. They just seemed slimy, and clearly had little concern for their customers, as long as they got their commission.

    This is natural. Think about it. People who are working at the Apple store are working there because they want to work at an Apple store, just because it's an Apple store. There's more than enough people who want to work there that they have no need to hire people who are just going for the bucks.

    Apple's got all kinds of problems, and they piss me off at times. Their computers are pretty but unexceptional and intentionally crippled (there's no way I'd have considered a Macbook over a Thinkpad for a second if I could run OS X on a Thinkpad), they've got this horrible tendency to stick to bad ideas forever (Steve, putting two buttons below the Macbook touchpad WILL NOT make the other kids laugh at you), and their approach to syncing leaves me cold (no, I'm NOT going to pay you for a .MAC account just so I can reliably sync my PDA to two Macs), and (by the way) the term "Genius Bar" is too twee to be believed... but the people they have working for them are top notch... and they let them show it.

    (am I ambivalent about this company or what?)

    1. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Having two touchpad buttons is a usability nightmare compared to chording with the control key (which is right next to the damn touchpad anyway) or the two-fingers-on-touchpad-plus-click gesture. Seriously, you really don't want to have to remember where the cutoff is, or accidentally trigger the wrong button that often.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    2. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by ingsocsoc · · Score: 1

      I would actually like to have to remember where the left button ends and the right button begins, if it's in the middle Apple fanboys could probably remember too :)

    3. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      Do you have tiny hands or something, though? The control key is right there. And if you can't reach that fair, surely you can be arsed to leave two fingers on the touchpad while your thumb clicks the button?

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    4. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by argent · · Score: 1

      Having two touchpad buttons is a usability nightmare compared to chording with the control key

      Oh, yes, it's better to hold my right hand in an uncomfortable position, especially when I'm already suffering because the crummy Macbook Pro keyboard has been aggravating my RSI, or use two hands just to control the mouse pointer.

      And multitouch is sufficiently finicky to be unusable for me.

      I've got the laptop, I have to use it Apple's way when I'm on the go, so it's not like I haven't tried... and it's always a huge relief to plug in a real multi-button mouse (and fire up my Logitech bluetooth keyboard) and get back to my "usability nightmare".

      Seriously, you really don't want to have to remember where the cutoff is, or accidentally trigger the wrong button that often.

      "remember where the cutoff is"?

      That's *why* two buttons is better than chording or multi-touch. The second button is clearly distinct, you can find it by feel... you don't have to "remember" anything.

      Seriously.

      I've *never* had to "remember" where the cutoff was. I've *never* accidentally clicked the wrong button. Not until I discovered Apple's passive-aggressive relationship with multi-button mice and found it *impossible* to reliably right-click with the "Mighty Mouse" or with the chorded touchpad.

      Gawd, it's like discovering a Harvard Soviet. I didn't think anyone outside Apple actuallly believed their one-button propaganda any more.

    5. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by argent · · Score: 1

      The control key is right there. And if you can't reach that fair, surely you can be arsed to leave two fingers on the touchpad while your thumb clicks the button?

      Frequently I *need* (and if you think that's an inaccurate term, I pray you never have to suffer from RSI) to have *no* fingers on the touchpad while I click the button... because it's too hard to be sure the pointer is going to stay in the right place otherwise.

    6. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      You already have two hands on the thing already, and before I had the dual-touch touchpad, I usually chorded with the left hand. I guess there are circumstances where an actual second button would be better, but I've never been left wanting for one since I got my MacBook, and I only rarely wanted for one when I had to ctrl-click on my PowerBook (on ill-behaved third-party apps).

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    7. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by argent · · Score: 1

      You already have two hands on the thing already

      Not by any means. In fact when I'm using both hands I'm often not using the touchpad at all. I'm typing, or navigating using universal access controls, because it's quicker and more convenient (except in badly behaved apps that don't support universal access properly like iTunes). And when I'm using the mouse or touchpad my left hand is free to manipulate objects in the physical (as opposed to virtual) world: a cup, a phone, to gesture to someone in the same room (in three dimensions, even), turn the pages of a document or book, or move a rule or template about on a printed diagram...

      You might not feel the need for it, but you simply can't argue that because YOU don't need it, NOBODY needs it.

      * I don't like everything Apple does. Arguing that I'm wrong about my own requirements isn't going to make me like Apple any better, it's just going to piss me off.

      * You don't need the absence of the second button. You could easily ignore it or configure it to act like a left button. So there's no benefit to you from supporting Apple's design.

      So what's your point?

    8. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      and it's always a huge relief to plug in a real multi-button mouse (and fire up my Logitech bluetooth keyboard) and get back to my "usability nightmare". I don't believe he was calling multiple buttons on a mouse a usability nightmare, just multiple buttons on a trackpad specifically. On a mouse, all the buttons are under your fingers, so you just click with a different finger to do a right-click or middle-click or whatever. On a trackpad, the way you use your hand is completely different. I think I do prefer the control-click and the gigantic single button on my iBook... when I'm away from my desk. When I'm at my desk, I use an Apple USB keyboard and a multi-button IBM mouse with 4-way scrolling whatchamacallit.

      found it *impossible* to reliably right-click with the "Mighty Mouse" Yeah, the Mighty Mouse sucks for that reason (although the scrollball feels sorta neat).

      or with the chorded touchpad. If you're having trouble holding the pointer still without letting go of the trackpad, something's wrong. Either you've got the sensitivity up way too high, or you have an atypical physical impairment. If the latter, I'm sorry, but please try to understand that for those of us without your limitation, Apple's current solution works better for us than something that would work for you. If the former, go to System Preferences / Keyboard & Mouse / Trackpad / Tracking Speed.
      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    9. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by argent · · Score: 1

      I don't believe he was calling multiple buttons on a mouse a usability nightmare, just multiple buttons on a trackpad specifically.

      Having a fundamentally different user interface when you're using a trackpad and when you're using a mouse is a bigger user interface nightmare. Control-click (two controls requiring two hands) is completely different from right-click (one hand).

      On a trackpad, the way you use your hand is completely different.

      But on the other hand, this is balderdash. There are differences but they're minor compared to the fundamental one of using one or two controls.

      If you're having trouble holding the pointer still without letting go of the trackpad, something's wrong.

      Yes, something's wrong. It's called "my wrist is damaged from years of working on soviet-quality dumb terminals from the '70s". But this is hardly an atypical physical impairment in this industry.

      If the former, go to System Preferences / Keyboard & Mouse / Trackpad / Tracking Speed.

      Significantly reducing the tracking speed significantly increases the amount of repetitive movement required to move the pointer. Do you see the problem here?

      I'm sorry, but please try to understand that for those of us without your limitation, Apple's current solution works better for us than something that would work for you.

      Um, I've already made that bloody point more than once, and you're missing a couple of big points (ones that I've already made in this thread, perhaps not clearly enough):

      * My comment was about why I have a love-hate relationship with Apple, and why despite that I have nothing but praise for everyone I've every run into at an Apple store. Telling me I'm wrong to be frustrated with the pain their decisions caused, which is what you guys are doing, is just daft.

      * What works for me would still work for you... having a second button wouldn't prevent you from using the trackpad the way you prefer, but not having it prevents me from using it the way I need.

    10. Re:Apple store employees are first rate. by demi · · Score: 1

      Seriously, man, you can't talk to these people. Like mindless zealots everywhere, they are a tarpit of illogicality; unthinking apologists for anything that comes down the pike. Something you don't like about the holy Macintosh (or emacs, or Python, or anything else that attracts this sort of person)? Must be something wrong with you. And everyone else. And their "ill-behaved" applications and fingers and minds.

      They probably think the Thinkpad's little eraser will blow your finger off, too. And a scroll wheel? Man, that fucker will suck you in and grind you up. Focus follows mouse? Get the guillotine, monsieur!

      --
      demi
  45. Parent is lying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I watched parent poster type above post on working iPhone. He is lying and having fun tricking you into modding his post up. He has 5 iPhones and they all work beautifully.

  46. OpenJokeo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Settle down, Beavis.

  47. Re:I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

    That company no longer exists. That's like saying if Delta Airlines merged with American Airlines and bought the naming rights to rename the company Pan-American Airlines, you wouldn't fly on it because Pan-Am treated you badly in the 70's.

    --
    In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  48. I had an OK experience by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    I went to an AT&T store to get the pre-approved credit check; the last thing I wanted was for something to go wrong at home and to have to go back *IN* to the store. The staff was courteous, but the credit checks tended to make the line go a lot slower than an Apple Store would have been.

    The biggest problem was supply - the store in Virginia that I went to seemed to only have 30 phones on Friday, and sold out of 8GB models quickly. I managed to snag the 2nd last phone, a 4GB model. Friends at other stores in the area also experienced low stock at AT&T stores, whereas the Tyson's Corner Apple Store had well over 500+ phones, given the lineups serviced there without a shortfall.

    --
    -Stu
  49. Great experience at Apple Store by stockmaster · · Score: 1

    I went by the Apple Store in Valley Fair Mall, San Jose, CA at 8:50am on Friday to "see the line". It was reasonable (about 100 people), and fun (lots of Slashdot-types in line, with Steve Wozniak at the head of the line near his Segway), so I stayed for about an hour. Then I felt guilty about neglecting my work for a whole day, and left to get some work done. After dinner, I went back to the store to see how things were going, and whether I might still be able to buy a phone. I'm not sure how long the line got right at 6pm, but there were easily still 100 people ahead of me in the (new, outside) line when I got there at 7:30. Yet I waited just 30 minutes, as the line moved steadily along, and I easily made my purchase in the store at 8 (8GB model). The store manager and other employees did come out and told people in the line not to worry, that there would be plenty of phones available for all of us, and there were. When I left, there was no longer a line outside the building, so I guess they cleared it.

    I was very impressed. I have purchased other products at the Apple store, and the fact that any employee can ring you up for a credit card purchase, take your signature on a Symbol handheld computer, and then email you your receipt is extremely efficient and impressive. This is what allowed Apple to process people so quickly; as many as 8 people buying phones in parallel, with the whole transaction taking just 1 minute.

  50. My AT&T Store Was Fine by Kostya · · Score: 1

    I waited at the AT&T in the Kitsap Mall (Silverdale, WA). The people manning the store there were great. They even ran little contests with snacks (Apple pies or Apple dips from McDonald's). They let you in one at a time because there was no point in letting people mob the store--plus it built up anticipation, I'm sure. When I got in, the only hitch were that all the computers were getting smashed with the traffic. These were AT&T's machines.

    I then had to wait for a full hour and a half (driving time back to my house) to activate it. At that point, I downloaded iTunes 7.3 (reasonably quick) and then tried to activate it. This process seemed to take quite a while. At one point, I got an error message about the iTunes store being swamped, but that went away. Then my number port seemed to hang, but then the activation went forward (albeit slowly). I got a few emails 5 minutes after I finished the process, and everything was working.

    So for my part, servers were slow, but no one botched the job. I found the AT&T people really helpful at my location. But then we only had 100, maybe 150 people waiting in line. They ran out of 8Gs quickly, but I was within the 1st 15 people in, so I just didn't care--I knew I was getting mine :-)

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  51. Where is my Wii? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still can't casually walk in to any store and get a Wii. (WA/Redmond/Bothell). It's July 2007!

  52. I didn't have any trouble by nsayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I went to the AT&T store in Santa Clara. I showed up at 4 and was about 40th or so in line. I estimate that by 6 there were probably only about 100-150 total in line. The line went very slowly once 6 o'clock came around. I attribute this to two things:

    1. The staff was trying to upsell accessories and AT&T DSL service.

    2. Their computers were bogged down due to the event.

    I had (have) a Cingular RAZR already, and he identified me in the computer. I don't know for sure, but pre-opening announcements were made to the effect that they were going to set you up with an account in the store prior to your iTunes activation, probably as a means to prevent eBay arbitrage.

    After I paid, he dropped the phone in a bag and actually sealed it. Not sure what the point of that is/was.

    The last oddity was that a store employee was stationed by the door and was locking and unlocking the door as people would enter and exit. I pointed out to them (on the way out - I'm no fool) that the fire marshal would have a fit if he caught them doing that. Crowd control is understandable, but locking the only means of egress from a retail space when customers are present is a bit of a no-no.

    When I got home, the iTunes activation procedure with the phone was everything they promised it would be. It was only a couple minutes before the iPhone was up and running.

    1. Re:I didn't have any trouble by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      The last oddity was that a store employee was stationed by the door and was locking and unlocking the door as people would enter and exit. I pointed out to them (on the way out - I'm no fool) that the fire marshal would have a fit if he caught them doing that. Crowd control is understandable, but locking the only means of egress from a retail space when customers are present is a bit of a no-no. "If you're flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit."
      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
  53. Re:I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T by djw · · Score: 1

    I don't know how long ago this occurred, but if it was within the past 30 years, you could have sent them a polite letter and the calls would have stopped immediately. If you tell a collection agency to stop calling you, they are not allowed to call again -- regardless of whether the debt is valid or not. The next thing they would have to do is sue you, and it sounds like you had enough documentation that you'd easily have prevailed and might even have gotten back more than your costs due to the harassment.

    Learn your rights and you'll have a much easier time keeping them. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is a good place to start.

  54. Incredibly ancient joke by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Uh, that joke was originally about Apple and IBM, and was coined the second time ago that an IBM/Apple merger was being talked about.

    1. Re:Incredibly ancient joke by SimHacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A very old joke, that I heard years before I worked at Kaleida Labs, a joint venture of Apple and IBM. At Kaleida I experienced the full impact of being the butt of that joke. The funny thing about the joke is that it's actually true, and applies to AT&T now as much as it did to IBM in the past.

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
    2. Re:Incredibly ancient joke by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      BTW are you nsayer as in the phrase "crash bang nsayer"?

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
    3. Re:Incredibly ancient joke by nsayer · · Score: 1

      I think I dimly remember having an account on crash, but if I did, I wasn't very active. I was very young at the time and was much more connected with the BBS scene.

    4. Re:Incredibly ancient joke by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      I think we had a discussion on the info-apple mailing list in 1985 about your experiences with shareware vis a vis your CMS software (written in Applesoft and machine code on ProDos 1.1.1), and I asked you how well giving away the software and selling the manual worked.

      I used to be a big Apple fan back then in 1985, but they've really disappointed me in the intervening years.

      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
    5. Re:Incredibly ancient joke by SimHacker · · Score: 1

      Apparently I was already pretty disgusted with Apple Computer by 1985. So you can guess how excited I was by the iPhone when Jobs announced there would be no software development kit and developers would not be allowed to write code for it.

      Apple still wants to discourage "overzealous hackers", but they're fine with overzealous fan-boys, as long as they're not programmers.

      -Don

      Times have changed at Apple Computer ...

      Newsgroups: net.micro
      From: A2DEH@MIT-MC.ARPA (Donald E. Hopkins)
      Date: Wed, 14-Aug-85 09:32:22 EDT
      Local: Wed, Aug 14 1985 6:32 am
      Subject: Times have changed at Apple Computer ...

      From the Apple IIe Owner's Manual, page 115:

      "About Kids and Computers: Most kids are fearless about computers and think nothing of popping the top off of the Apple IIe and rearranging the circuitry just to see what will happen. To discourage these overzealous hackers, there are screw holes on the Apple IIe cover so classroom computers can be bolted shut."

      I am too disgusted to comment.
      -Don

      --
      Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  55. More AT&T woes by tgv · · Score: 1

    If you know what it's like to be on hold and have some empathy, this story (http://macslash.org/) will make your toes curl. The guy got an iPhone at the Apple Store and tried to get it activated by AT&T by telephone. Bad idea...

  56. HAHA by FPF422 · · Score: 1

    In Europe, combined sales are forbidden... so when it comes here, you will just use your usual network... no problems, no fuss...

  57. Re:and i quote (the video) by tgcid · · Score: 1

    link

    Google video for "the phone company" (with quotes).

  58. Its a totally different company! by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    The AT&T apple is using is a different company than the one that screwed you over.

  59. AT&T store in Boone, NC was fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There were about 40 people in line and I got one. Saved a 5 hr round trip drive to the Apple store in Charlotte. Staff was friendly and trained. I don't know what happened when they ran out.

    I like the phone. I agreed with Pogue's NYT review. WiFi good, Edge not so much. I was supprised how great the screen looks.

  60. I Understand Exactly What You Mean! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - i understand completely... it is absolutely DISGUSTING the way consumers are being treated nowadays, but that's not the real shame!

    - nope, the real shame is that the sheep-like consumers out there seem to like being treated badly, and nowadays seem to expect and accept bad treatment, poor customer service, ID10T problems with tech support, slacker salespersons, and Bangalore-based customer service...

    - i must be getting old, because the number of companies hosting good service (in this OF's mindset) is getting smaller every day...

    - for example, i just went through the Best Buy pricing obfuscation scam (where on-line prices are not the same, nor willingly matched in stores)... did a quick research for an SDHC card for a digital camera... found a card at a good price, and highlighted AS IN STOCK at a local Best Buy...

    - went to the store (while running errands with the wife), picked up the card (same stock number), but it was $10 more... i thought, "no problem, the price will be fixed at the register..."

    - WRONG WRONG WRONG!!!! not only that, but was told, "Oh, you have to print out the Web page and bring it in if you want the Web price..."

    - here's the kicker: in the past number of years our family has spent THOUSANDS of dollars with Best Buy... but no longer!

    - for the cost of a few dollars, Best Buy has lost my business FOREVER!

    (and my wife has a bad DVD/CD habit, and had also been eyeing some new appliances)...

    - this is why i understand what you went through...

  61. My experience. by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

    A friend and I went to the AT&T store near my work, even though there's an Apple store a couple blocks away. We were about 15th in line, and the final count before the doors opened was around 90. The AT&T employees let us in a few at a time, just enough for one customer per register. They greeted us with just as much enthusiasm and friendliness as I've ever recieved at the Apple store, even more so in fact. The people who work at my local Apple store are a little snobbish, and act like you're bothering them if you have a question. In my opinion the AT&T store did a great job, and were plenty prepared for the mad rush for the iphones. We got in and out with our iphones and accessories within 10 minutes, and it only took that long because we had a couple questions about the data plans. We went across the street to a Mexican restaurant, pulled out a Macbook Pro, got onto a wireless access point, and unpackaged the iphones. They already had a charge, so we hooked them up right away and started up iTunes. After a small iTunes update (to version 7.3 which adds iPhone support), we activated the phones on iTunes and it was up and running. We didn't even have to swap SIM chips like with most new phones. It just put our account info into the SIM chips already in the iPhones. I still haven't figured out the comment that says "I stood in line for 2 hours in 102 degree weather yesterday... and guess what? My phone still isn't activated. It's been over 24 hours." Why isn't your phone activated?

  62. AT&T was great by pdclarry · · Score: 1

    I had no trouble getting an iPhone at an AT&T store. True, it was the 3rd one I tried that had not run out, but that one had a huge inventory and a short line (5 minutes). As I needed to migrate from an older AT&T contract it was the only place to go. The store had about a dozen reps, and all seemed to be knowledgeable and helpful. My rep pointed out that it would be cheaper to add the iPhone to an existing contract than to get a new iPhone-specific contract; in fact, it was also cheaper than my current Treo plan. So she first migrated my old, grandfathered Original AT&T Wireless to a New AT&T family plan, threw in 3 LG 3G phones (free) for my 3 lines, then sold me the iPhone. Apple could simply not have done this. When I got the iPhone home I registered in on iTunes, adding it to the new plan. My monthly charges will be about $20 less than they were with the old plan and Treo. That will pay for the iPhone pretty quickly, compared to a new Treo. And I now have an extra LG.

    --
    Larry
    No sig this message

  63. I contract for AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been a contractor for at&t since 1999 in both the phone book publishing and old telephone business lines. I've **never** worked at Mobility or in an at&t stored. With all that said, here's what I know.

    at&t has 350,000 employees
    at&t realizes that with a company that large, you can't have "above average" workers everywhere.
    at&t creates simple processes to be followed and trains their people on those processes over months and years.
    at&t can't train their people very well for a 1-2 day product launch. The iPhone launch proves this.

    Apple Stores, on the other hand, will have people that are comfortable with computers and technology. Most of these folks will be really excited (just look at Apple stock prices http://finance.google.com/finance?q=AAPL it has doubled in the last year ) about selling an iPhone, iPod and eventually a MacBook to you.

  64. Re:I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T by Internet+Ronin · · Score: 1

    LOL,you actually sent a letter to the CEO?

    That's great. I didn't think people actually tried stuff like that... He probably never saw it man, and they never give you your money back anyways. In fact, a retail manager would have probably been more likely and able and willing to credit your account for it.

    Anyways, I also think you've misplaced the blame somewhat... I realize that AT&T shouldn't have sent you to collections, but from my understanding I think your anger should be diverted elsewhere:

    1.) You. Isn't it your bill? Isn't the snafu going to be listed at the top of it, for the 'several months'? I'm pretty sure you should read those before you blindly pay them. I'm still honestly trying to figure out how this happened. If you kept paying your bill those payments should have been applied to the most past due bills, thus you would, at most, be only a single month behind, which is hardly a 'collections' type of offense.

    2.) I thought you said AT&T happily handled their end of the situation, but it was the collections agency that was pestering you and getting on your nerves? But now you're pissed at AT&T? How does that make sense? Because they sent you to collections? Again, I'm not even sure how that's possible, but I'm even less sure how that's possible with you paying attention to the bills more closely.

    I realize accepting your responsibility in this situation isn't an easy thing to do, but it's certainly your fault in large part. I believe you've failed to understand why the bill was late (almost all the billing is computerized, and no one gets kicked to collections for a two day late bill; in addition, I don't think AT&T sends ANY active customer to collections, only canceled accounts, but don't quote me), or why it went to collections.

    Could it have been handled better by AT&T? Sure, it always can. It could have been handled better by you too.

    If you want to 'vote with your dollar' so to speak, don't you think you ought to at least examine the issues?

  65. Woops, I don't want it. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Free Software to the rescue. If that sucker takes a sim card and works with my provider and does ogg, I want it. iPhone is off the list.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Woops, I don't want it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plea$e don't feed the Troll known a$ 'Twitter' a$ it'$ bad for $la$hdot...

  66. calling Bull Shit by Gary+W.+Longsine · · Score: 1

    People here are always "calling Bull Shit". Who is this person? And why do you all call them after someone lies or says something stupid? (Oh, and by the way, did you call them on your iPhone? Just curious.)

    --
    If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  67. If you read my post... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...I did tell the collection agency verbally on the phone that AT&T acknowledged that the bill had been paid, and I asked them not to call again. And I also told them in writing in a letter I sent to the address they provided, enclosing documentation, and they did not stop immediately. Maybe they are not "allowed" to call again, but the fact is that they did, over and over again, for about a month.

    I "know my rights." It's like Dr. Strangelove, where the President says "But I thought only I had the authority to authorize a nuclear strike," and Buck Turgidson hems and haws and acknowledges that General Ripper "may have exceeded his authority."

    1. Re:If you read my post... by djw · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are not "allowed" to call again, but the fact is that they did, over and over again, for about a month.
      That would have been the point at which you sued for statutory damages under the FDCPA. It's a bitch, but you have to stand up and fight for your rights sometimes. No one else will.
  68. Spelling mistake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess you have got spelling mistakes in your name. Shouldn't it be bukkake? You seem to be that kind of person to me.

  69. Sure I'm pissed at AT&T. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    I'm pissed at AT&T for turning over my bill to a collection agency in the first place, when a) it wasn't paid late, b) even AT&T thought it was only a couple of days late, c) I'd been their customer with a virtually immaculate payment record for twenty-five years. They should have given me about ninety days with slightly less polite warning letters every thirty days.

    I'm pissed at AT&T for turning over my bill to a sleazy collection agency which they evidently weren't able or didn't want to control, and which most likely was breaking a few laws in continuing to call me.

    I'm not pissed at the pitbull, I'm pissed with the guy that sicced the pitbull on me.

  70. My experience by tsmit · · Score: 1

    I stood in line for about 2 hours at an att store. The guy there was fairly knowledgeable about the product. That being said, they got 30 8gb and 10 4gb models. For about 200 people in line. I was number 39, so I ended up with a four gb version. Some guy did come out with an eight versionand sold it for 1000 dollars to someone in line.

    --
    Yes, my girlfriend is a BitchX
  71. Public attention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>one person with a crowd of people around them because they are showing off their spiffy new iPhone

    Same thing happens to me whenever I go outside. People are always crowding me. I just don't get it. May be it has something to do with my giant size (its 12" now, when resting, and seemed to have gone twice the size since I bought iPhone) penis sticking out like a pole. And that started after I bought my first Apple product.

    Sigh! I miss old days when I was an anonymous face in the public with just a regular size penis tucked nicely inside my trousers where it belongs.

  72. AT&T took FOR-EVAR! by grgcombs · · Score: 1

    I wasn't planning on spending my day camped inside the mall at the Apple store waiting for 6 o'clock (by noon it was over 150 people), so I decided to hit the nearest AT&T store. The line looked long, but upon counting, I was #47 @ 4:30. Unfortunately, the Texas Rain had stopped and I was wrapped around the wrong side of the building where it was hot as hell (98-F). We saw no signs of AT&T people whatsoever until 5:45 when they started running a survey. No one answered anything regarding how much stock they had. Even though I was #47, it took AT&T staff TWO HOURS to service everyone in front of me. They evidently thought they had to run credit checks on everybody. Then they decided to do manual receipts instead of printed ones. By 8:00pm, I was still outside waiting and pissed. We saw the manager and asked if there were going to be enough phones for us. He said that we'd have to wait and see, we might have to get vouchers. One of the guys behind me said, "you really ought to go in there an check your stock, because the last thing you want to happen is have all these folks outside wait another two hours for your slow-asses to tell us that we can't have a phone." He thought about it a second and made an "executive decision" to check the stock. Turns out he had plenty, but he acted like it was a huge inconvenience for HIM. Once I finally get in side, shortly after 8pm (remember, I was only #47!) they try to run a credit check. I said, I'll do it at home, just give me the goddamned phone. The clerk was totally clueless. He would put in my order then complain that the computer "kicked him out" and he'd ask me all the questions again. Plus he kept trying to sell my accessories, which I had no f*ing interest in, yet he was persistent, like he needed the quota or commission. It took 15 minutes from the time I walked up to the counter until the time I left the front door. Totally unacceptable.

    I'll never enter another AT&T store again. And I already can't wait until my 2 year service contract is up.

    1. Re:AT&T took FOR-EVAR! by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      "I'll never enter another AT&T store again. And I already can't wait until my 2 year service contract is up."

            June 29, 2009. Enjoy your crappy service! Hope the phone you paid full retail for was worth the 2-year contract you signed for it.

            I'm still shaking my head at this behavior.

    2. Re:AT&T took FOR-EVAR! by grgcombs · · Score: 1

      You and me both, I guess. I've been known to be gullible when it comes to Jobs. He's swindled me before, (CHRP, OS9, 68K->PPC->G3/G4/G5->Intel, iPod G1->iPod Dockables, etc.) and he'll probably do it again. I'm not sure who I'm more pissed at in general. Jobs for tricking me with his guile, or me for falling for it every time.

      Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice ... well, we won't be fooled again.

      Somehow, at least in my psyche, this doesn't hold up to empirical scrutiny.

      G

  73. Really, ATT's fault? by ahoehn · · Score: 1

    AT&T, through the depths of its incompetence, could derail the iPhone. It's not as though anyone put a gun to Apple's head and forced them to go with ATT. I'm sure that all of the major cellphone providers would have been Thrilled to be able to offer the iPhone. Nothing was forcing their exclusivity to one provider. They Chose to go exclusively with ATT, so any blame for problems with that provider rest solely on Apple's shoulders.

    Tim Wu over at Slate.com makes a pretty good argument that the decision to make the iPhone a ATT exclusive, along with a few other things like limiting the software that can be developed for the phone, mean that the iPhone isn't revolutionary at all.

    I'm sure it has a beautiful UI and makes things pleasantly intuitive, but I think I'll be waiting for version 2, or a particularly good "iPhone Killer".

    --
    Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    1. Re:Really, ATT's fault? by Brain+Stew · · Score: 1

      Actually,

      They went to Verizon (the second biggest cell company) and tried to go with them first. Verizon felt that the requirements that Apple laid out were too restrictive (selling in Apple & Cell Stores, activating at home, no sales in sister kiosks in Best Buy or something similar) and backed out.

      When AT&T (the largest cell company in the US) said yes, a figurative "gun" was put to their heads.

      --
      "Here's a spoiler: You're will die alone."-Triumph the Insult Comic Dog
  74. Probably banned from export by tivoKlr · · Score: 1
    I would imagine given Venezuela's lovely political attitude towards American companies, that Apple won't be jumping to make the iPhone available to Venezuela in any hurry.

    Enjoy your cheap gas.

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
  75. Vibrate mode by tivoKlr · · Score: 1

    I've found that my t-mobile phone only really works well up the ass when set to vibrate, and then only if it can still get a signal so that someone else can call me so that it rings (vibrates).

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
  76. In Soviet Russia... by feedmetrolls · · Score: 0

    iPhone activates you!

    --
    You are reading a sig. Cancel or allow?
  77. Re:I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

    For the next year, I got periodic mailing and occasional phone calls from AT&T saying they missed me, and wouldn't I switch back.

    I had basically the exact same experience, except it was local phone service from AT&T (before they merged with SBC, so I believe it was the same company as that which offered long distance). They screwed up something simple. I wanted to add Caller-ID to my existing service, and after a ridiculous obstructionist manipulative experience with customer service where they simply REFUSED to tell me the cheapest way to do it and instead went into a script about my "calling patterns", they finally added the service, then proceeded to over-bill me by $50 or $100 the next month. After getting it initially wrong, they screwed up the follow-up by changing me to different pricing packages and misrepresenting the price of the packages each time, and getting the billing wrong as well; I had to spend hours and hours on the phone with them to finally get everything right.

    Eventually I switched, and for a long time afterwards, they sent me these mailings saying, basically, "PLEASE come back!" God, it was pathetic. It was like a guy who stands up his girlfriend on several dates, forgets her birthday even though she reminds him of it 10 times, acts like an ass when he meets her parents, and then when she finally dumps him he says, "But honey, I love you! Why are you leaving me?!"

    I won't deal with AT&T anymore because it's ugly. It's ugly to watch a company be that incompetent and complacent. I don't like to see the inane side of humanity that clearly.

  78. Question by LKM · · Score: 1

    What were the software differences you noted between the phones, and did you get a software update for the iPhone via iTunes?

  79. Re:Not troll, I swear. Just really insecure. by bushelpeck · · Score: 1
    All right, we get it. You're just far superior to anyone who would stand in line for something as crass as a (gasp!) commercially-available product.


    If only we could all be so refined and intelligent as you, the world would be a much better place. Ah, but then you wouldn't have the pleasure of publicly reminding the commoners of how far beneath you they all are, now would you?

  80. Re:HAHA - only some Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finland - banned / UK not banned. There are lots of subsidised phones with long contracts and penalty clauses in the UK.

  81. we don't care, we don't have to... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly, I can't find a YouTube video.

    I believe this is what you're looking for

  82. late answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry for the late answer. So far the only software difference I've noted (but i've spent all of five minutes helping the others with their phones heh, so there may be more differences) was at least one phone includes a lot less bookmarks in safari than mine. My Safari includes around 15 or so bookmark folders.. history, bookmarks bar, bookmarks menu, new, mac, kids, sports, entertainment, etc. One of the other phones just had a couple of plain bookmarks in this section, no folders at all. and those bookmarks weren't editable (but they could be deleted, and new ones created that could be edited, if i recall).

    i don't believe itunes performed any software updates. it did say something about it would next check on 7/7/07 for updates.

    1. Re:late answer by LKM · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That sounds more like an error than an actual difference in software... Interesting.

      And I'm guessing iTunes checks for new software once a week?

  83. Finally ... by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

    You're just far superior to anyone who would stand in line for something as crass as a (gasp!) commercially-available product. If only we could all be so refined and intelligent as you, the world would be a much better place.
    Someone who UNDERSTANDS.
    --
    There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
  84. hackability by LKM · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping somebody figures out how to access the internal memory on the iPhone so the installed version of OS X can be hacked. If the AppleTV is any indication, that would make the iPhone greatly hackable...

  85. Exclusive ATT deal was dumb by z_gringo · · Score: 1

    I was baffled by the exclusive deal they made with AT&T. Surely they would have done better without that deal.

    I can't wait to see the European version. What are they going to do here? Will only 1 provider for each country get the phones? Will they be unlocked or unlockable?

    Surely Apple knew this would be a problem. Why did they then choose to launch exclusively with AT&T?

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
  86. If you have to explain it... by StreetStealth · · Score: 1

    ...it's not a good brand name. FIC should just shorten it to "NEO" and then maybe they'll sell a few.

    "Oh, what's that you're using?"

    "Why, it's an FIC Neo1973!"

    "An eff-eye what?"

    "I mean it's the NEO!"

    "Oh, cool!"

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  87. [OT] Re:Apple ends up looking bad (er, less than g by stuktongue · · Score: 1

    Way to go, dude. I can't say I had the same luck... what's your approach? C'mon, help a brother out.... :-)

  88. Re:Millions of Dollars of Paid For Hype For Nothin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by 'the world' you mean 'androgynous hipster apple whores,' yeah...


    You mean like Justin Verlander of the Detroit Tigers, who was showing off his new iPhone to his fascinated teammates during Sunday's ESPN-televised game versus the Minnesota Twins?

    Verlander is last year's American League rookie of the year, and is 6'3" and 200 lbs.

    Does he count as an "androgynous hipster apple whore"?

    Or how about Joe Morgan, who commented on how the cameras caught Verlander playing with the iPhone, saying that he (Morgan) had just lined up to get a pair for his twin daughters?

    Surely he isn't an "androgynous hipster apple whore" too?

    Yes, it could all be an incredibly subtle product placement by Apple (Verlander was in the dugout but not pitching Sunday night, and ESPN is Disney). If so then Apple is even more full of genius marketers than anyone has ever suspected, because they got almost 15 minutes of very natural, unscripted-seeming pro-iPhone banter going during a relatively quiet period near the end of a (tied until the bottom of the 8th) nationally televised major league baseball game, and millionaire jock heros proclaiming their lust for these new gadgets.

    On the other hand, it's unlikely many "androgynous hipster apple whores" were watching the game.

  89. There was a very convenient place to buy it by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

    On Saturday. At my Apple store. Lots to sample, lots of geniuses floating around to answer questions, and four cashes, very little waiting. No lines.

    There were lines because people liked sitting on line so they could be interviewed and have fun with the community. There's no shortage.

  90. Re:I will never ever ever ever deal with AT&T by CatOne · · Score: 1

    Not all that surprised. Most of the telcos are pretty bumbling.

    Back in the heyday when AT&T, Sprint, and MCI were competing for each other's long distance business, I switched LD carriers about 8 times in 3 years. I'd get a call, they'd offer to pay my switch fee, I'd ask how much they'd put up, they'd say $25, I'd negotiate up, maybe hang up and tell them to call back when I'd get a better deal, etc.

    I got it up to $100 plus the $8 switching fee, so they'd switch me, and then stay with them for 2-3 months, until I got another call. It was stupid -- they were paying me. I just had to sit through about 10 minutes on the phone as they had to patch in a 3rd "independent party" that I had to read off some script to.

    Silly industry.