Slashdot Mirror


Little Old Lady Hammers Comcast

WheezyJoe writes "The Washington Post reports that a little old lady took a hammer to Comcast. Apparently fed up with the lousy service she received from a botched Comcast installation of "triple-play", and a completely humiliating experience at a customer service center, 75-year-old Mona "The Hammer" Shaw took her claw hammer back to the customer service center and bludgeoned the office equipment into tiny plastic pieces."

416 comments

  1. Comcast Is Deluded by gbulmash · · Score: 5, Informative

    If Comcast thinks an "overwhelming majority" of their 25 million customers are very satisfied with their service, they'got their heads in the sand. I'll bet you most of them have gripes enough to be dissatisfied, just not enough to switch to DirecTV or Dish Network.

    For example, we've got a 30+ mile per hour windstorm going. My cable's still on. Don't know how a dish would be faring. But that doesn't mean I'm happy with Comcast.

    Here in Washington, we had a program guide and DVR powered by Microsoft, a little nod from Comcast to the folks in Redmond. It wasn't in use anywhere else in the country. I found it to be very buggy and annoying. If I told the DVR to tape only new episodes of "Stargate SG-1" only on Sci-Fi, only at 8, besides putting the 8 p.m. Friday showing of new episodes in the "upcoming recordings" list, it would put in that plus every one of the 6 p.m. reruns all week long. On top of that, it loved to become unresponsive while fast forwarding. It would just fast forward along, well past the point where you wanted it to stop, buffering every key press sent by the remote, until it finally decided it was done and executed all those keypresses in quick succession.

    When Comcast announced we'd be getting the program guide and DVR control software the rest of the country has, I literally jumped for joy, singing "ding dong, the witch is dead", because I thought ANYTHING had to be better than the Microsoft DVR software. I was soooo wrong. Comcast's is worse. Try to set a series recording for "Top Chef" on Bravo and you get every episode... sort of like the Microsoft DVR, but with one major difference. Microsoft put the recordings in the to do list well in advance so you could remove them. With the new Comcast DVR software, it doesn't add these things until the last minute, so the next time you look at your recorded programs list, there's a bunch of crap you didn't expect and don't want. And better than the fast forward that won't stop, the new software gives me fast forward that advances 10-20 seconds and pauses. If you hit the fast forward again, it jumps up to double-speed fast forward and you overshoot whatever mark you were trying to hit.

    I contacted customer service and they just said they were sorry I didn't like it, but tough.

    So my options... get a dish. Wait until Verizon rolls out FIOS TV in my neighborhood (they laid the cable this summer, but are dragging their feet on FIOS installs) and see if they're better. Shell out $800 + $12.95 a month for a dual tuner HD TiVO with Cable Card. I'm currently pinning my hopes on the second option. But when Verizon gets off their asses Comcast loses my $1800 a year for cable TV and cable internet.

    The only reason Comcast can delude themselves that their customers are happy is because they've been spending millions to lobby the FCC to restrict Verizon's roll-out of TV via fiber and prevent their customers from having a second terrestrial alternative. As TV over fiber rolls out, if the telecoms don't cock it up (and that's a BIG if), you could see people leaving Comcast in *droves*.

    Hooray for Mona Shaw. She took civil disobedience a little too far, but God bless her. We're all having a vicarious thrill from her exploit.

    1. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Ark42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not perfect, but I honestly like the simplicity of the Dish DVRs. They work fairly well for me. I don't have problems recording duplicates of shows or anything like that. Fast forward works. 30-second forward and 10-second backward skip buttons out of the box work just fine. The only annoying thing to me is that if you pause, then press forward to go frame-by-frame, the first jump takes you a second or so backward, then you can precede to press forward 30+ times to get back to where you paused and wanted to actually see things frame by frame. Oh well, nothing is perfect. At least it's only $30/month. Oh, the dish works fine in the 60+ mph winds with 1cm sized hail balls we just got a few hours ago in Michigan too.

    2. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      For example, we've got a 30+ mile per hour windstorm going. My cable's still on. Don't know how a dish would be faring. But that doesn't mean I'm happy with Comcast.


      You're lucky. When I had comcast, a light breeze... moderate rain storm... Just about anything, and the cable and internet service would.. Well, it wouldn't go out. It would just get really unreliable.

      I had satellite TV for 5 years though, and the only times it was out were when the dish got buried in snow more than half way.

      I still ditched that service too though, since DirecTV got rid of TiVo. You just can't win...
    3. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by amccaf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      f Comcast thinks an "overwhelming majority" of their 25 million customers are very satisfied with their service, they'got their heads in the sand. I'll bet you most of them have gripes enough to be dissatisfied, just not enough to switch to DirecTV or Dish Network.


      There's an old joke:

      Two guys are out camping... Suddenly they hear the sounds of a tiger outside their tent.

      The two guys look at each other.

      One man starts putting his running shoes on.

      Despite the situation, his friend starts chuckling at him. "What are you thinking? You can't outrun a tiger!"

      The man looks back at his friend and says, "I don't have to outrun... the tiger."

      -------

      Like you say. Comcast doesn't have to be the best. They just have to outrace Direct TV and Dish Network.
      --
      "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
    4. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you consider the TiVo box, you should know that Comcast is using TiVo's software for their DVR. Linkage

    5. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by jeaton · · Score: 4, Informative

      Shell out $800 + $12.95 a month for a dual tuner HD TiVO with Cable Card. The TiVo HD is $299. The TiVo Series3 HD is currently $599.

      Both can be found a bit cheaper if you look around.
    6. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> my $1800 a year

      Wake the fuck up! You are paying $1800 a year for bread and circuses (and not even getting any bread).

    7. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Steeltalon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hahahahaha! Oh, that story is rich! Kudos to her for doing what I never had the balls to do. My personal story is one of absolute horror. Last year, I was a comcast customer. I would frequently have lag spikes that pushed my latency up into the seconds (yes, that is more than 1x1000ms). Every damn time that I called Comcast they'd send out a service tech who might be there at the time of a spike or might not be. It was all very random. So, finally I reached my breaking point and I told them that they'd better not just send me another tech who'd tell me that my signal was fine. I was told that I was getting a "network specialist" and this definitely wasn't just another tech. Well, the guy calls me from the road and didn't seem to know what I was talking about when I said "network specialist". Then he showed up and not only was he a regular tech but he was a regular tech that was completely dismissive of my problem. He acted like I wasn't really having a problem because, at the time, I was running on my wireless router... Nevermind all the logs that I'd taken from a direct connection to the modem. So, after nearly throwing the guy out of my house, I called Comcast and started screaming. This got me somewhere as I finally got escalated to the CEO's office where they had a customer care executive assigned to me. Their network guys looked at my latency and determined that my problem was only happening 2% of the time... Which, regardless of when it was occurring, was acceptable to them so while they could have alleviated the issue by adding another link they wouldn't. We just got FiOS in my current place about a month ago and Comcast called to try to get us back. The guy that called seemed to think that all verizon connections were DirecTV and had no idea what FiOS was. He also threw out that BS number of how many of their customers are satisfied and told me that their service is "much better now". I told him it would take an act of God to get me to go back to Comcast. It was a very cathartic phone call to get. I hope that the recording goes to upper management but I doubt it will.

      --
      Regards, Ian
    8. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1
      The new software is infinitely better than the Microsoft software was for the DVR.
      1. It is far more stable. The Microsoft software had a tendency to crash when a recording finished. Mine crashed at least 5 times a week. If another recording was scheduled to follow the one that crashed it, you'd lose at least 5 minutes of the start of that second recording, because it took that long for the box to reboot, and then figure out that it was authorized for DVR. Deleting a recording also could trigger a crash, so whenever you finished watching something, you had to check to make sure you didn't have a recording in progress or coming up soon, unless you wanted to risk disrupting it.
      2. The new software is much much faster. It is quite reasonable to actually use it to plan future viewing, or to ask yourself at 3 to 9 what is starting at 9 that you might want to watch. The Microsoft software was close to useless for this. For all but the most trivial planning, it was faster to get up, go to the computer, and look at Comcast's web-based guide.
      3. The back button on the remote does the right thing on most screens, unlike on the Microsoft software.

      Yes, the Top Chef think is annoying. But at least with the software being fast and stable, it is just a minor annoyance, as you can quickly delete those spurious recordings. That's the big difference between the old and new software. The old software's problems were fundamental problems that were hard or impossible to work around, whereas the new software's problems are just annoyances.

      The funny thing is, Microsoft knows how to do good DVR software. UlitmateTV for DirecTV was quite good (although it also was slow).

    9. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      Good thing you're looking to go to TiVo, because, at least in my area, FIOS TV uses Motorola recievers with some similar-sounding cruddy Microsoft software on them. I wasn't too happy with some things about my Cox cable boxes, but I'd kill for a Scientific Atlanta box at this point.

    10. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Osty · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before you consider the TiVo box, you should know that Comcast is using TiVo's software for their DVR.

      Not quite. Comcast is planning to have the Tivo interface sometime in the (far, far) future, but for now we're stuck with the PlaySkool OS that can't seem to figure out that when I tell it to record "new episodes of Family Guy", I don't mean "every single episode of Family Guy that Fox airs, which amounts to two a day, every day of the week, and sometimes three". The Microsoft interface never did that (though the Microsoft interface did want to record every rerun of the Sopranos when I told it to only record new). I'm pretty sure this is a tagging issue in Comcast's listing service, where reruns are incorrectly tagged (either tagged as new, or not tagged at all and thus assumed to be new).

      For the original poster, you can cancel future recordings by flipping through the "Scheduled Recordings" pages. There's no single "TODO" list anymore, so you have to flip through each day until you run up against the end of the current listing download. Deleting is also more difficult, going through several menus with many annoying pauses. And sometimes it'll record a show even when you told it not to.

      If CableCARD wasn't so damn flakey, I'd go ahead and upgrade to the Tivo Series 3. For now, I blame much of the nastiest of the Comcast DVR offerings (Microsoft or PlaySkool) on the shit Motorola hardware. At least they enable the firewire output, though it's unusable as a recording source for a Media Center PC since you still need an analog tuner in order to get the channel guide.

    11. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      I live in Champaign, IL, and go to the University of Illinois. Comcast recently bought out our local cable company... not the cable company that serves our area, just the local branch of it... right before football season started... and now they refuse to offer the Big Ten network which broadcasts our team... but I'm sure that's just a coincidence... right? (that sarcasm is directed at Comcast, not the parent poster)

      But before I start to really go off about that bullshit, our box does the same thing that yours does. It's a real pain. We don't have any other options either. I live in an apartment building, so we can't get satellite.

      I have a friend who lives in Chicago and has been fed up with Comcast's service, largely because the cable seems to go out during Cubs games. They also continually call him and try to convince him to get a hardwire phone line, even though he has repeatedly told them he only uses his cell phone. Due to a variety of other factors, he's done with Comcast. He's willing to pay an extra $50 a month to get a dish and some other internet provider. With how much people love to consolidate bills these days, you know there's a problem when people are willing to pay more for multiple services that actually cost more than the original. It truly is amazing that Comcast thinks its users are satisfied.

    12. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by anagama · · Score: 1

      It's even worse where I'm at. My choice is comcast or dialup. I've never in my life been a satisfied comcast customer -- I've been a customer because I have no other realistic choice.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    13. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it was on hold for a while, Comcast has finally started rolling out their new Tivo based set-top boxes.

    14. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Buran · · Score: 1

      A dual tuner TiVo does NOT cost $800. Sorry. Try $300.

      I've seen this before - people complain that hi-def Tivos cost too much - "I'd buy one if they cost half that" -- when in reality they are imagining a price that is twice the real price.

    15. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by wickedskaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      So... they were camping in India... or with Sigfried and Roy?

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    16. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by jalet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Reminds me of another camping joke :

      Two guys are out camping... During the night, one of them hears something and asks the other one :

          - Are you masturbating ???
          - Yes
          - Please could you do this with your own cock ?

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    17. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Romancer · · Score: 4, Informative

      All I have to say is TIVO!

      My parents have Dish and my inlaws have the Charter DVR, both of which are total crap compared to the Tivo software. Even it's not perfect but the updates over the past years (series 2) have been for the better and have actually made me keep it over the PC DVR I had build using various linux DVR software packages, none of them were that much better than the Tivo. And when I finally had the weather and streaming audio working Tivo came out with the same features built in. The only drawback I have now is the movie collection and youtube browsing features I had with the PCDVR have to be used in the media room and not in the living room or the bedroom where the Tivos take care of everything else. Amazon Unbox isn't great but it's a pretty good option so far.

      --


      ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
      ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    18. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't seem to figure out that when I tell it to record "new episodes of Family Guy", I don't mean "every single episode of Family Guy that Fox airs, which amounts to two a day, every day of the week, and sometimes three". TiVo does the same damn thing.

      Now if you'll excuse me, I have to delete the 5 "first run" episodes of MythBusters that it recorded today...
    19. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Drive42 · · Score: 0

      Coincidence? Perhaps. But: good god? you think Comcast would give a shit about your local football team? I mean, what percentage of the total audience is that? I'm not being rhetorical. I'm really asking. Do you think that really factored into their timing? It seems rather unlikely to me. I could be wrong.

    20. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Twin+Pines+Mall · · Score: 5, Funny

      How friggin dare anyone out there make fun of Comcast after all she's been through. She lost their call center is jalalabad, they went through a couple regulation issues. This lady turned out to be a user, a cheater, and now shes putting our equipment through a Hammer. All you people care about is..... readers and making money off of them. SHE'S A HUMAN! What you don't realize is that Comcast is making you all this money and all you do is write a bunch of crap about her. She hasn't performed in years. Her song is called "Please hold while we process your call, this call may be monitored for quality purposes" " for a reason because all you people want is MORE MORE MORE MORE MORE. LEAVE HER ALONE! You are lucky she even performed BASTARDS! LEEEAVE COMCAST ALLLLLONE!.....Please. Perez Hilton talked about professionalism and said if Comcast was a professional she would've pulled it off no matter what. Speaking of professionalism, when is it professional to publically bash someone who is going through a hard time. Leave Comcast Alone Please.... Leave Comcast alone...right now....I mean it. Anyone that has a problem with her you deal with me, beacuse she is not well right now. leave her alone

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Gundam is in charge of CowboyNeal..or something..
    21. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by toddabalsley · · Score: 1

      I got a dish. We had Charter, who put in a box that was labeled "BAD" on the back in big black Sharpie. That was the ONLY time of the six scheduled appointments where someone showed up. Or called.

      The box freaked out after about a day, turning to the heavy metal station, and killing the display. The support department was worthless, the managers I spoke to were combative, and I had enough. 30 MPH wind: yeah, I lose TV intermittently, but with Charter, I had no TV on a sunny day.

      I don't care how good your product is, if your customer service experience is worse than botched dental surgery, I will happily pay more for less from one of your competitors.

    22. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While funny, it's also true and how companies see the market today. You don't have to deliver a good product. All you have to do is to deliver a product that's not worse than the competition and to make sure that nobody can deliver one that's better.

      What worries me is that this is increasingly accomplished by forming cartels and pressure on lawmakers to make sure that nobody can emerge who offers better service.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I want to know is what her address is so I can send her a big box of chocolates and some flowers. I don't care if she is a 100 years old, any woman who opens a can of whoop-ass on Comcast turns me on.

    24. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      Depends on which Tivo, you can pickup the Series 3 for between 600 and 800, or an HD Tivo for about 300, which has the same innards as the Series 3, minus the THX, the OLED (not even needed, but a nicety) display, and the fancy backlit remote, all of which can easily be lived without.

      As for the satellites, I do remember the HD Tivo for Directv, and it was extremely expensive, not to mention now completely useless since they switched to a new signal with the new sats they launched.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    25. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      Increasingly? It's a time-honored tradition...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    26. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      "If Comcast thinks an "overwhelming majority" of their 25 million customers are very satisfied with their service, they'got their heads in the sand. I'll bet you most of them have gripes enough to be dissatisfied, just not enough to switch to DirecTV or Dish Network."

      They think this because at the end of your calls to them they ask if you are "Very Satisfied" or "Really super-duper Satisfied." By offering two choices that don't fit, people pick the lower one. If they offered a "Not satisfied at all" option they'd get an accurate picture of their customers.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    27. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      and now they refuse to offer the Big Ten network which broadcasts our team...


      The same thing has happened in my area (central PA). Comcast has a monopoly and has stated emphatically they will not, under any circumstances, offer the Big Ten Network on their Basic/Standard cable packages. They will only offer it on their upper tier programming which means one would have to upgrade their service to get it (i.e. pay for more channels you don't want to watch to get one channel you do want to watch).

      Here's the thing though; they've already eliminated two channels from their Standard package, have not lowered their prices to reflect this and refuse to slot the Big Ten into one of those now empty channels. I was really ticked when I found out that after years of having it, they stopped carrying Channel 11 out of New York. Now I can't get my Julie Chang fix in the morning or check out what's happening in the Big Apple. When I inquired about them dropping this channel, the girl on the phone apologized that I wouldn't be able to see the Mets play. I'm sure she was surprised when I told her I didn't care about the Mets but wanted the channel for other reasons.

      To top things off, Comcast just announced that next month they will be raising their rates for the second time this year (~5%) which means that again I'll be paying more for but getting nothing new in return since the upgrades will only apply to their Premium services. As soon as the last season of Battlestar Galactica is over, I'm cancelling my service and they can go pound sand trying to get me back.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    28. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by darjen · · Score: 1

      So my options... get a dish. Wait until Verizon rolls out FIOS TV in my neighborhood (they laid the cable this summer, but are dragging their feet on FIOS installs) and see if they're better. Shell out $800 + $12.95 a month for a dual tuner HD TiVO with Cable Card. I'm currently pinning my hopes on the second option. But when Verizon gets off their asses Comcast loses my $1800 a year for cable TV and cable internet.

      Why not get an over the air HD antenna? I got one with a Samsung set top box for my HD tv and it's great. With a crappy radio shack antenna I get all the networks in glorious HD, along with PBS. I was just watching the Red Sox/Indians game last night and it looked great.

      I don't need HDNET or any of those other HD networks. I get movies from Netflix, so no need to pay for HBO-HD or any of that crap. Once they come out with a high definition dvd player that will play both formats, I'll spring for one of those rather than going back to HD movies from cable.

      Now my cable bill will only be like $55/month rather than the $115 I was paying for internet and HD service. Now I am only paying Time Warner for internet access and that's it. Screw the triple pay... it's not worth it. The only thing I really miss is having ESPN in HD, but for me it's a small price to pay for cable TV freedom. The only way I will ever pay for cable tv again is if they start offering an inexpensive HD only package or ala carte.

      BTW, since I still have internet access from Time Warner, I can get the regular cable TV channels if I just plug it in directly to the TV. They don't block it or anything. I think it's the same way with most cable companies.

    29. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I still ditched that service too though, since DirecTV got rid of TiVo. You just can't win...


      I still have DirecTV with my existing Direct Tivo. If my Tivo breaks and I can't get a replacement, THAT is the day I tell Direct to F-off.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    30. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I've been a customer because I have no other realistic choice.

      Welcome to the monopolist market economy!

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    31. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, for a long time you could actually go into a store, buy the latest kind of technology and you had a pretty good chance that it's better than what you bought 2 years ago. This isn't true anymore.

      You'll notice that, especially in consumer electronics, people start looking for machines with old firmware or older fashioning because they allowed something a newer revision (or the next generation of the same product) does not offer anymore. And I'm not even talking about "illegal" options like unlocking certain goodies that should be available for extra money or enabling a console to play copies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    32. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that the practice has been around, whenever 'companies' (or producers, since it has existed longer than companies have) could get away with it, at least as far back as the middle ages. The guilds had similar practices, at least near the end of their influence, and in any market where there is a near-monopoly or oligopy situation, you'll probably find further examples. The British Empire's enforcement of rules that helped such behavior was what caused the American colonies to revolt.

      It's not new, it's common, and it has occured whenever the companies that make products could get away with it. Unfortunately at the moment they are learning they can get away with it in the tech sector in the USA.

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    33. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      I was soooo wrong. Comcast's is worse. Try to set a series recording for "Top Chef" on Bravo and you get every episode... sort of like the Microsoft DVR, but with one major difference. Microsoft put the recordings in the to do list well in advance so you could remove them. With the new Comcast DVR software, it doesn't add these things until the last minute, so the next time you look at your recorded programs list, there's a bunch of crap you didn't expect and don't want.

      So, let me see if I understand this right... Your chief complaint is that when you ask the DVR to record a show it does so until you tell it to stop?
    34. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Welcome to the monopolist market economy!

      <sarcasm> Well, it's only a monopoly because of Government regulation, if the Government would just take the shackles off and go to a laissez-faire economic system all of the natural monopolies of the world like Comcast, Verizon and Time Warner would magically disappear and be replaced by a healthy competitive marketplace where the consumer would win. Because the free market solves everything, from broadband access issues in rural areas to feeding the straving children in Africa.</sarcasm>

      (Sorry, had to beat the free market trolls to the punch.... there goes my karma for the week....)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    35. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Darby · · Score: 1

      Hillary is a Warhawk

      Warhawk, or Chickenhawk? Seems the latter would be more appropriate.

    36. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      You'll notice that, especially in consumer electronics, people start looking for machines with old firmware or older fashioning because they allowed something a newer revision (or the next generation of the same product) does not offer anymore. And I'm not even talking about "illegal" options like unlocking certain goodies that should be available for extra money or enabling a console to play copies.

      No shit! Like how Linksys purposefully dumbed down all of their routers so there wouldn't be enough memory/resources to load any of the community supported firmware versions onto them.

      I won't even dwell on all of the stuff that Vista won't let you do.... Isn't it a conflict of interest for Microsoft to target a product at consumers while kissing the ass of the content providers and preventing people from doing something with their own PC?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    37. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I bought an HDTV... They didn't have the HD-Tivo anymore when I did.

      Just over this past few weeks they enabled their new HD stations that only work with their "plus" DVR, so even if I had gotten an HD-Tivo from them I'd still have had to switch now...

      I went Fios. If you live in an area where Fios is available, it's the best. Price, quality, selection, ablity to use whatever CableCARD device you want, internet service... I hate giving money to Verizon, but they earned it with Fios...

    38. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      "Recent"? I thought the cable company I got Internet access through was Comcast, back in 1998 when I lived in Urbana. Since I was a block away from the UIUC campus and taking classes at the U of I, I'd think that the provider a few blocks away in Champaign would have been the same. Maybe my memory's

      FWIW, at that time I used Dish network for TV service, and only got Internet through the cable company - even that was only because there was no xDSL service, and a T1 cost too much.

    39. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by nuzak · · Score: 1

      You're still paying per-month on a device that does the "service" of reporting everything you click back to TiVo, flashing ads at you while you skip, not giving you a single-button skip option or automatic commercial editing, and sometimes forbidding you from recording or keeping some programs that your content masters have decided not to allow you.

      Yeah, they may have some reason for some of these things, but I don't want to pay extra for it. I pay for my cable service, and the very instant there's a decent cablecard-enabled dvr that isn't TiVo, I'm all over it. As it is now, I won't even get digital cable, because I do like the fancy newfangled idea of recording something else other than what I'm tuned to.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    40. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as the last season of Battlestar Galactica is over, I'm cancelling my service and they can go pound sand trying to get me back.

      Posting anonymously for reasons soon to be obvious:

      I'm fairly lucky. Back in the day I got sick of being ripped off for TV and decided to live without it. So they trapped the cable signal out of my line. Well, guess what? Roadrunner stopped working! After three weeks of trying to fix it, one of their techs announced that the traps were bad and removed them from my line. He said they would be back "soon" with new ones. That was three years ago.

      So I'm paying for Roadrunner and as a side bonus I have full access to all of their analog channels. And you know what? I really wouldn't consider it to be a product worth paying for. I watch the Daily Show, Colbert Report, Mythbusters and the occasional Mets game. That's the extent of the programming that I care about that I can't receive without an antenna. Everything else is a network show (Law and Order, 24, etc) that I can watch for free with an advanced technology called metal coat hangers ;)

      I'm going to pay $55 a month (yes, that's what basic cable costs, unless of course you want to sign up for our digital phone.....) for three shows? Fuck that! If they ever do come back and install new traps I'll just switch to bittorrent for Mythbusters, radio for the Mets games. Colbert and Daily Show can already be watched on their webpages.

      Shit, before Time Warner rolled in we had an actual LOCAL cable company. It was $22.50/mo for basic cable, which was approximately 50 channels. Now basic cable is $55/mo and 60 channels. Other then TW's local news station (which sucks) and BBC America, all of the new channels are home shopping. Yeah, that justified increasing prices over 200%.

      So, fuck 'em. They won't get another dime of my money for TV as long as I live. I'd rather spend the money on vacations, beer, computer equipment or just about anything else. And when I have kids they will learn to live without it too. I'd rather have them playing outside or learning something on the computer then sitting in front of the damn boob tube anyway.

    41. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by mitgib · · Score: 1

      I bought a Tivo about 7 years ago, loved it, but then discovered SageTV and MythTV and being the geek, dropped Tivo just that fast. Still not 100% happy with MythTV or SageTV either, but both are far more flexible than anything else I've experianced.

      --
      Being a spelling & grammar Nazi is a sign you do not poses the intelligence to contribute to the conversation
    42. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Don853 · · Score: 1

      Comcast in central PA must be a total disaster. I called my parents in Chambersburg on their Comcast land line three times yesterday and each time got a message stating that all circuits were busy and I should try again later. I don't think I've been blocked from making a call strictly due to call volume since 9/11.

    43. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I have AT&T's solution, which is a windows CE based system with Tivo like functions. I don't think I like it.

      I love my Dish DVR. It is simple, it works, and it's extremely configurable. It does not search for programs. It works like a VCR. I'm happy with that.

      As for satellite receivers, only during extremely heavy electrical or thunderstorms do I lose signal. We're talking torrential downpours that would cause massive flooding in an hour if it was continuous.

      On quality of signal, even though AT&Ts signals are highly compressed (probably MPEG4?) the picture quality is quite good. If only the stream was steady. I get regular interruptions in the stream, causing 1-3s jumps. Still working this out, only had the system a week. I don't know what the true resolution of the underlying picture is. Dish's signals are also highly compressed and I haven't had the experience of seeing their HD signals yet, but their regular signals are good to acceptable, depending upon the broadcast resolution. (Dish uses 2 "standard" resolutions, 540X480 and 352X480. As you might guess, the latter, used for stations like Comedy Central results in rather mediocre pictures on larger screens)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    44. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Xanthis · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...not giving you a single-button skip option
      Though not advertised, this is how to enable the single-button skip. On your TiVo remote, key in the following sequence:

      SELECT PLAY SELECT 3 0 SELECT

      The skip-to-hash button on your remote will now skip forward 30 seconds during playback.

      If your TiVo get rebooted due to a power outage or a software update, you will need to re-key the sequence.
    45. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by ozric99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I used a series 1 TiVo in the UK and loved it. I now live in the US and have a series 2 TiVo.

      • It's slow, often taking a couple seconds to respond to the remote - sometimes I can wait 4 or 5 seconds before hitting the 'tivo' button until the menu comes up. When the menu does come up I can see the redraw.
      • Even though it's networked it can't view media on other devices.
      • Adverts all over the place.
      • Can't view its media on other devices unless you want to copy the programmes in real time and install some DRM bullshit.
      • When it loses the wireless connection, for whatever reason, it requires a reboot to reconnect.
      • 50% of the buttons on the remote are totally redundant.
      • Adverts randomly appearing in the menu structure.
      • Say I've recorded a couple of episodes of programme X and want to delete them. Can I delete the folder? No. I have to go into the folder and delete each individual programme. Then, to top it off, when I've done that, instead of removing the folder and dumping me back to the main menu it gives me a screen that says "Hey, there's nothing in here, you should press left to go back to the main manu". Honestly, the entire menu system is littered with these lazy UI choices.
      • Did I mention fucking adverts in the main menu! After this last update I stopped a program recording in order to change channel and, no shit, my three choices were "stop recording", "continue recording", "advert link". It hasn't happened since, so either it was a mistake or it only happens on certain programmes, but still, I'm paying a monthly fee for this serviec - why are there advert at all??

      When it came out TiVo was simply awesome but tech has moved on - TiVo is currently the device that is "almost there". At the moment the only thing it has going for it is ease of use and the occasional suggestion it throws up. I haven't seen the new series 3 devices - perhaps they're perfect, I don't know. The reason I still use TiVo is because I'm too lazy to setup and maintain MythTV/freevo/mediaportal. XBMC is about the best media player interface out there right now. If it could record TV I'd be right there - I hear there's a linux version in the mix but haven't looked at that in a while, so I may just do that right now.
    46. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      For example, we've got a 30+ mile per hour windstorm going. My cable's still on. Don't know how a dish would be faring. But that doesn't mean I'm happy with Comcast.

      If it is just a windstorm without rain, a dish should do fine. Radio waves aren't affected by wind. Of course if the dish is mounted poorly and wiggles and wobbles, or even worse, comes loose, that could interfere with your service. Plus a flying dish would be a frightening, but possibly comical site.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    47. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Can't speak about their phone service but yes, their service is dreadful. I live just outside Harrisburg proper and they are our only cable operator to choose from. Time Warner is further south in the Lancaster area but as far as I know, they haven't tried to come into this area. If they did, I'd be on them in a minute since I did have them for a while when I lived elsewhere.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    48. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be able to buy a dual tuner HD Tivo for $300 plus the monthly fee...

    49. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Avatar8 · · Score: 1
      Wait for the FiOS. It is well worth it.


      I was on Comcast TV for years. In 1994 when our service was out approximately half of the month, my wife sent them half our bill and canceled our account. We purchased DirecTV. Stayed with it for 10 years. Only issue was heavy storms that interfered with reception.

      Had Comcast (@home, ATTBI, Comcast) cable internet from 1998 to 2004. Had a problem every month: service dropped, area switch down for maintenance for hours, hours wasted on the phone to customer service with no resolution, faulty equipment that Comcast would not replace and a policy of "If the technician finds it is not our network, you'll be charged the house call." I'm certain they are more trained on proving the network healthy as opposed to fixing the real issues.

      Spring of 2004, I see the orange cables start showing up on our street. They're buried over the next month. I check Verizon's website and get on their mailing list multiple times. I'd nearly given up, but finally, in December a co-worker who lived near me mentioned he had it and loved it. I called and scheduled the appointment immediately. Tech showed up a week later, on time. Install went smoothly and quickly. I was flying on the internet in a few hours. In March FiOS TV was rolled out to our neighborhood. We signed up with the HD DVR package. HD, DVR, more channels and cheaper than DirecTV. Win-win-win-win. In May we added the phone service. Excellent quality and lots of features included with base price. BTW, the DVR (Motorola?) is very smart. I set a schedule to record a weekly show (Top Chef, Doctor Who, Heroes). Several of those shows are repeated. If the DVR sees the show has already been recorded (checks descriptions, I guess), it will not record it again. If I delete it before the repeat, it *might* record it. It has completely changed the way I watch TV. Plus, Dallas Stars hockey in HD is SCHWEEEETT!!

      Yes, Verizon takes some time to get distributed but it's because of the high demand. They'll get to you and they'll do it right, the first time. I've had no issues at all with any service. I've seen many post here about their issues with Verizon. I'm always surprised because having been a customer of Verizon in some form since 2002, the few problems I had were solved within 15 minutes when I called them. (that includes hold time)

      Wait for it. It's worth it. When you do switch, please, be sure to give Comcast a piece of your mind. They'll completely ignore you, won't ask why you're leaving or how your experience has been with them, but it will feel good to vent. Comcast is deluded. The only reason they *think* they're customers are satisfied is because most of their customers give up (or die) trying to get through to customer service to complain. What's the point? Not as if Comcast will fix it or change their ways.

    50. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by jeaton · · Score: 1

      You're still paying per-month on a device that does the "service" of reporting everything you click back to TiVo, flashing ads at you while you skip, not giving you a single-button skip option or automatic commercial editing, and sometimes forbidding you from recording or keeping some programs that your content masters have decided not to allow you. I actually transferred my old lifetime subscription, so I don't pay per month.

      I don't particularly care if TiVo gets a report of all of my clicks. My TiVo has never flashed any ads at me while I skip; occasionally, a one line ad will appear at the end of a program on the "delete this recording" screen, but I just ignore it. As far as automatic commercial editing, I've found that the 30-second skip hack and/or just fast forwarding is good enough for my needs. I've also never been forbidden from recording anything I wanted to record.

      The Comcast DVR I've used is significantly more ad-laden, also has no commercial skipping features, has worse fast-forward reaction time, and wouldn't surprise me if it reported back to Comcast on everything I watch.

      Yeah, they may have some reason for some of these things, but I don't want to pay extra for it. I pay for my cable service, and the very instant there's a decent cablecard-enabled dvr that isn't TiVo, I'm all over it. As it is now, I won't even get digital cable, because I do like the fancy newfangled idea of recording something else other than what I'm tuned to. I'd rather pay the TiVo fee than pay the Comcast DVR fee, personally, even if it is a bit more. Also, the longer I keep my TiVo, the lower my effective monthly fee is because I have the lifetime service. As much as I would love to see better competition in the DVR field, it's highly unlikely that any other CableCard compatible DVR will have significantly different features as far as commercial skipping and such.

      Also, pretty much all DVRs these days support recording something other than what you are watching. The CableCard TiVos certainly do, as do the Comcast DVRs that I've seen.
    51. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My hatred of cable companies started in my childhood, hearing my dad angrily arguing with them. He never kept a service for more than 3 years, I spent most of my life without cable, and Dish did not exist then in my area (and our price range).
      Only when I moved out did I understand. I get a better and more agreeable service from the Squeegee guys smearing my windshield waiting on red lights.

      Now I give them a hight finger. I keep Hight speed Internet only and rather give 25$ to Vonage then 15$ for the "proprietary / fake VOIP" of my Cable co.

      And TV you ask? Back to antenna.
      When a season of my favorite shows are over I hit Bit torrent and download it all. Feels like when my mom recorded all my Star Trek episodes in college, to be watched at Christmas or in the summer. It takes some discipline at first not to watch them when they air, but its real easy now. Only last year did I watch all 5 seasons of 24 in a few weeks. I cannot imagine waiting a week to see the next one. Only the late hour would make me stop.

      Aaahhh! Feels good to vent. Cable-co's are worst than phone-co in my book. These two are so bad I cannot even image what could be in third place. Government?

    52. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No conflict of interest. The interest is making money. Now, you will buy Vista anyway (unless you're willing to take the inconvenience upon yourself and moving to a non-Windows system), so they're fairly sure to get your money. To get money from the industry, they have to cater to their wishes.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    53. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      System vendor software is always bad, because it's the defacto. Get something from an independant vendor - some place like TiVo or ReplayTV - and it's going to be a whole different story. Note how people hated the Replay 2000 series? (I had one; it was awful.) But, once they were no longer the bundled component, suddenly they were very, very worried about whether people liked the interface - because otherwise, nobody would buy one. The Replay 3000 was a huge improvement. I haven't seen the 4000 or 5000, but I bet they're better still.

      I have a TiVo these days, and I adore it. It does almost everything right. In the entire time I've owned it, it's only crashed once (it's disappointing that appliances crash at all, but, well, compare that to my Replay 2000 and suddenly that's a superior record.) TiVo customer service is similarly awesome. During the entire time I owned my Replay - about eighteen months before the hard drive went bad - I was never able to get Replay to update certain wrong channel information with their channel data provider, Tribune (once called Trumpet Media.) When I got my TiVo, I called in once, and they said "it'll take about a week." It was done in two days. (Again, when I had a replay, it was a platform device; since they're now sold stand alone, I suspect their problems are gone.)

      You get what you pay for. You've already had two free DVRs that you hated. The free DVR from another company won't be any better. Bite the bullet and get a box from the companies that only sell boxes, because whether or not you like those devices is important to the company.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    54. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      In Northern California, they're trying to get everybody to use them for TV/Internet/Phone and send out an unrelenting barrage of snail-mail spam to get you to sign up, at one point they (Comcast) had live operators calling customers to persuade them to switch, I would always reply "so if I was having one of my heart attacks during one of your network problems what should I do?".

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    55. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Buran · · Score: 1

      I never understood why DirecTV dropped Tivo. I know people who have been forced to drop their Tivos due to this shortsightedness, if they want HD channels; the Tivos got far-better reviews than DTV's homegrown boxes. Why go to the expense to change, especially after lots of satisfied customers were left with pieces of junk?

      I'm trying to convince my significant other to drop DirecTV and switch to a real HD Tivo. The aggravation of the junk they push isn't worth it. There's a reason why people who have Tivos love them, even though it would be easier to just use what the TV provider pushes.

      I laid down the law that if I move in with him, instead of his moving up here, we're getting cable expanded to full HD+CableCard because I refuse to give up my lifetimed series 3.

      That said, while I think the Series 3 is great, the HD units are as well - less disk space, the unofficial kickstart to expand to an eSATA drive doesn't work on them yet, but $300 is a pretty good deal for the best DVR/set-top box you can get (barring the S3 of course, which I quite like and don't regret buying when I did to get the lifetime transfer deal). Unfortunately, the frustrating lack of acknowledgement that you don't have to spend $700 to get an HD TiVo is probably driving off a lot of people.

      I don't know if it's FUD or ignorance, but please, people (like the OP), list the correct entry price, not one more than twice as high.

    56. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by pluther · · Score: 1

      we've got a 30+ mile per hour windstorm going. My cable's still on. Don't know how a dish would be faring.

      Comcast's commercials to the contrary, dishes seem to actually fare better in extreme weather.

      When I was living in St. Louis, my cable would routinely go out in heavy storms (screen gets all blocky, then replaced with "Searching for satellite signal"). My friends with Dish network would often be working just fine during this time.

      The problem with Dish is that you can't really use it if you're renting an apartment, and you don't have a balcony facing South. (And often not even if you do, if the management company doesn't allow you to mount a satellite dish outside.)

      I've got internet now through Comcast, but I never use their TV service. Currently, it's not even plugged into my TV. The only alternative is SBC DSL, which sucks. Doesn't mean I'm "satisfied" with Comcast by any means.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    57. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      Hi there,

      I live in West Seattle (up 35th). Comcast internet was down when I got home yesterday at 5:00ish. It came back up around 7:30. Not sure where you live in Seattle, but cable wasn't up everywhere during the storm.

      BBH

    58. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by anagama · · Score: 1

      You're lucky to just get junk mail. Some guy turned up at my door the other night trying to get me to spend $100/month on net/tv/phone. I told him I use my cell phone and don't watch TV so I'm not interested. He still tried to run his pitch.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    59. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      In Northern California, they're trying to get everybody to use them for TV/Internet/Phone and send out an unrelenting barrage of snail-mail spam to get you to sign up, at one point they (Comcast) had live operators calling customers to persuade them to switch, I would always reply "so if I was having one of my heart attacks during one of your network problems what should I do?".

      I've never understood why anybody would want phone service from the cableco. It has all of the reliably issues of VoIP products like Vonage and it's usually almost twice as expensive.

      Your heart attack comment is dead on. I have two schools of thought. Either you are young, childless and in-shape and can afford to not have a POTS line -- those people (myself included) have cells and no landline of any sort. Or you have kids, or medical issues, or what-not and want a bulletproof phone solution. In that scenario you need POTS.

      Why the hell anyone would give up the reliability of POTS, while gaining nothing (at least a cell phone gains you the freedom to use it anywhere in the world with signal and a roaming agreement) in return is beyond me.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    60. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Don't know how a dish would be faring. But that doesn't mean I'm happy with Comcast.

      works quite fine in a wind so long as it's mounted well (our's is mounted with 4 4 inch lagscrews into a stud through stucco and shiplap.).

      only thing that has tripped up our satellite (we have starchoice) is heavy lightning activity right on top of us.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    61. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by ScanIAm · · Score: 1

      I'm ordering an HDHomerun for digital/QAM cable and I'm already using BeyondTV and Hauppauge TV cards for analog cable.

      If you are bright enough to keep a nix box running, you can do this and save a crapload of money.

      Cripes, $300-$500 for a box PLUS 9 bucks a month?

      Suckers.

    62. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by rawg · · Score: 1

      "For example, we've got a 30+ mile per hour windstorm going. My cable's still on. Don't know how a dish would be faring. But that doesn't mean I'm happy with Comcast."

      I regularly get 30-50MPH winds where I live and both my DirecTV and WiFi still work without a problem. Also, rain and heavy snow does not disrupt my signals.

      --
      The above is not worth reading.
    63. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by nuzak · · Score: 1

      A QAM tuner might be nice, but I don't know if that's how my cable company actually sends any of its signals. All I have and care about is basic cable, but I just don't know if I'll be reduced to using an IR Blaster and sticking my PC after the cable tuner just to record anything at all. Both things are very much not ideal. Honestly, it reminds me of the hassle that cable was in the mid 80's.

      I replaced my Hauppauge with an ATI Theater 650, which only works under Windows, but it blows Hauppauge out of the water in terms of image quality. Except it has a tendency to magnify signal quality problems -- the minor flickering that channel 12 (CW) suffers from turns into major rolling and jumping for a full second or so til it regains sync.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    64. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by klx · · Score: 1

      At the interview for my last job, one of the standard questions was "Tell us about a bad customer service experience you've had."

      I learned later that every candidate who was asked that question used an example from Comcast.

      It's frustrating that so many PR flacks, when asked about an incident like this, insist that the problem is isolated and most customers are happy, and certainly no other customers identify with the one that made news. It might be tolerable (not okay, just tolerable) if they made such claims to the public while turning rabid trainers loose inside the call centers. But they really seem to be fooling themselves.

    65. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Quikah · · Score: 1
      For the record I have had a series 1 TiVo for ~6 years and a Series 3 since they were released.

      You're still paying per-month on a device that does the "service" of reporting everything you click back to TiVo, Don't care, but you can opt out if you are really paranoid.

      flashing ads at you while you skip NEVER seen this.

      not giving you a single-button skip option or automatic commercial editing Meh, FF works fine for me, otherwise you can enable a 30s skip if you want it.

      sometimes forbidding you from recording or keeping some programs that your content masters have decided not to allow you. Only time I have seen this is on a Amazon Unbox rental I bought. Otherwise I have NEVER seen this on anything I have recorded, of course I don't have any premium channels so maybe they are more strict.
      --
      Q.
    66. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by demon · · Score: 1

      I never understood why DirecTV dropped Tivo. I know people who have been forced to drop their Tivos due to this shortsightedness, if they want HD channels; the Tivos got far-better reviews than DTV's homegrown boxes. Why go to the expense to change, especially after lots of satisfied customers were left with pieces of junk?

      Because Rupert Murdoch and friends (yeah, that's right, News Corporation, DirecTV's current owners) decided "screw you TiVo, we can make a better DVR on our own!" Except based on most reviews, it's "alright", but still no TiVo. There are rumors that DirecTV, after the buyout from Liberty Media, might kiss and make up with TiVo; however, it's still just a rumor, no substantiation. Yet.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    67. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by egypt_jimbob · · Score: 1

      ... don't watch TV so I'm not interested. He still tried to run his pitch. Telemarketers call me about 3 times per week to try to sell me a new whiz-bang television package. They invariably have no clue what to do when I tell them I don't have a TV. Usually they say something like, "Oh, well this is much better than over-the-air programming..." No. You don't understand. I don't own a television. Your programming can never reach me because I do not own a physical device required to receive it. And yet they still try to run their pitch. Is it so hard to believe that some people prefer to live without the time-sucking vortex that is a television show?
      --
      I am a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    68. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      I guess it was last year, which is actually a lot longer ago than I thought. I thought it had happened over the summer. Maybe Comcast owned the cable here before, but my roommates and everyone I know has had Insight for at least 4 years.

    69. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by demon · · Score: 1

      Actually as I understand it, UltimateTV was developed by the same people that did WebTV - a company which Microsoft bought, so was outside their culture. I'm betting that's the only reason UltimateTV was decent.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    70. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by SiChemist · · Score: 1

      I can tell you why DirecTV dropped tivo for its DVR. In a word, synergy. That's what Rupert Murdoch calls having one of his companies use another of his companies for a product or service. See, Murdoch bought the company that makes the current DirecTV DVR so that he wouldn't have to pay the license fee to Tivo. It was on the order of $2-$3 per unit per month. Now, they can charge their customers the same fee and that money goes into Murdoch's other company.

      I'm a directv customer and I'm going to bite the bullet and dump my directivo for one of their HD units. I was considering buying an HD Tivo, but the cable company where I'm moving has a pathetic HD lineup.

    71. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      you think Comcast would give a shit about your local football team

      Now, I'm not actualy a big football fan, but you do realize that this isn't some "local football team", but a major university's football team. It's not like I'm talking about some minor league baseball team or high school. There is a large fan base.

      Depending on what you look up, the Champaign-Urbana area has a population of around 170,000. There are over 40,000 students at UIUC. The football field hold 71,000 and has been sold out and packed for the last few weeks. Tickets for one of the games were going online for 5x face value, but you can probably find some on the street for double. I can't begin to estimate the number of alumni and parents of students who follow the games. I also forgot that the basketball games are also broadcast on the Big Ten network, and after our recent seasons, there's quite a following.

      Granted, that's not a huge chunk of Comcast's market. According to wikipedia, Comcast has 24.1 million subscribers. If I estimate our area to have 100,000 Comcast subscribers who want to watch the football games, that's just under .5% of their viewership. Still, that's a big chunk of change.

      But besides my area, this has happened at other Big Ten schools. I don't have the time to look it all up. You don't have to believe me. I'm really not a football nut either. I have season tickets because I get them cheap as a student but I rarely stay past the first half. I don't watch football on the weekends. I don't have a fantasy team. But I do think that this was done on purpose.

    72. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by demon · · Score: 1

      Hope you like getting your HD locals - because you may be able to make a DVR that can capture them via clear QAM, but that's about all you'll get (assuming your cableco follows the must-carry rules - many play a bit fast and loose with them). You won't be getting HDnet, or Discovery HD Theater (or any of the other new Discovery HD channels), or TNT in HD, or HBO in HD, or ESPN in HD, or... well, you get the picture. Before I finally got my CableCARDs for my Series3 TiVo, the only channels I could get in clear QAM were my local Fox affiliate in HD, sometime IFC, History Channel International, and Music Choice stations. That was all. Whoop-de-frickin'-doo. Without CableCARD, or a cableco-provided DVR, your choices are going to be very, very narrow.

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    73. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, Verizon isn't that great either. I've just came off 2+ years of service with them (as a DSL, then later as a FIOS customer) and despite the fast speeds, their customer service leaves a lot to be desired.

      At one point, I was getting random $200+ bills. When I contacted them about it, they were unable to locate where the charges came from but as they were sure the charges were accurate, they refused to remove them.

    74. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Is it so hard to believe that some people prefer to live without the time-sucking vortex that is a television show?

      Yes, because the only people that believe TV to only be a time-sucking vortex are the people that are just a touch insane (sometimes more than just a touch). Only a good job keeps them from becoming the guy on the street pulling his own teeth out because the government is monitoring him through a molar. Now if only he could find the right one. Do you have a wrench I could borrow?

    75. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      All I have to say is TIVO!

      Yes, because digital cable here comes with a free DVR, I would want to buy a separate DVR, then pay monthly fees on top of my bill in order to replace the DVR that comes with the digital package. When Tivo offers lifetime packages again, I'm in. I'm not going to pay monthly fees forever to duplicate what comes free with my cable. And for those packages where the DVR doesn't come free, the cost of the DVR is less than the cheapest Tivo subscription, and if your cat pees on it and breaks it, you turn it in for a new one, no questions asked. So, why again should I do Tivo?

    76. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhh! When government restricts competition, that's a "market failure," which of course requires even more government regulation to "fix."

    77. Re:Comcast Is Deluded by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      That's Gummermint to you buddy ;-)...

      And the right tool is a pair or right angle needle-nose pliers.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  2. Dear Mona by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you considered the washington post as your next victim? I think we'd all appreciate someone sending them a clear message about flagrantly unnecessary pagination.

    --
    ôó
    1. Re:Dear Mona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, my thoughts exactly!

    2. Re:Dear Mona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But admit it, you didn't click on any of their ads. So the pagination is their way of getting back at you.

    3. Re:Dear Mona by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even get that far. The Post demands I log on and I skip the article.

  3. "I can't decide whether you shoud live or die..." by amccaf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn.

    I can't figure out whether I want to go out and smash office equipment with a hammer, or I want this woman to come in and smash my office equipment with a hammer.

    Which end of this fight is the right end? I CAN'T DECIDE!!

    --
    "Flag on the moon. How did it get there?"
  4. The greatest story ever written by Raineer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please let this woman have a made-for-TV movie made of her life.

    1. Re:The greatest story ever written by j-min · · Score: 0

      ... and put it on OnDemand.

    2. Re:The greatest story ever written by Raineer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... and put it on OnDemand. Score!!!
    3. Re:The greatest story ever written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She really deserves her own article on wikipedia.

  5. I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by feepness · · Score: 2, Informative

    Internet + SD cable. No box. I think I get great speed because I'm in the city. Never had an issue.

    1. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by plover · · Score: 1
      I'm mostly happy with Comcast too. Their HD DVR cable box sucks ass, especially compared to my ReplayTV units, but the HD quality is OK and their internet service is quite fast and I have really good uptime.

      But I'd never voluntarily get VoIP through them. It's more expensive than POTS, plus since my wife installed Vonage as a temporary stopgap for her home office, th-e d-am-n sig-na-l s-ou-nd-s li-ke c-rap. If that's how they treat voice traffic, it'd be totally useless.

      --
      John
    2. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by Damarkus13 · · Score: 1
      No that's just how they treat Vonage's voice signal (and I'm not 100% sure its all Comcast's fault) I've had Vonage with Comcast for quite a while now and if you are doing much more than just browsing websites, don't try to make a call. But at $25 a month (cheaper than VoIP thru Comcast, or a traditional land line [with no long distance at all!]) can I really complain? If you go with the lowest bid, you get what you pay for.

      I know several people with Comcast's VoIP and they don't seem to have the same problem. Either their VoIP cable modem has better QoS than the horrible linksys router Vonage sent me or Comcast uses a different pipeline for their phone service.

    3. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by plover · · Score: 1

      I look at it as poor quality of service on Comcast's part. If they can't deliver Vonage packets at a reasonable rate, what evidence do I have that they'd deliver their own? None. They won't get me as a customer for that reason alone.

      --
      John
    4. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by epp_b · · Score: 2, Funny

      Internet + SD cable. No box. I think I get great speed because I'm in the city. Never had an issue.
      Hey, that's cool! Comcast's only satisfied customer is a Slashdotter!
    5. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by jlarocco · · Score: 1

      Consider yourself fortunate. Since Comcast took over Adelphia I've had a couple of half month long outages and dramatically reduced speed. Not to mention that their tech support staff can only be described as incompetent. And that's being nice.

      But of course my only other option is 1/6th the speed for the same price.

    6. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by feepness · · Score: 1

      I used SunRocket with them until they went out of business. I switched to Vonage. $14.99/month if they can stay in business. My wife doesn't notice any difference and that's the key for me.

    7. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      It probably has to do with the fact that LOCAL bandwidth / latency is (usually) not an issue. Once you get beyond local however latency tends to suck (can be good, or can be horrible.)

      That and the HUGEASS buffer on cablemodems makes it impossible to do any kind of QOS.

      This is why I use a S518 ADSL card and do my own QOS on my server (or course, using DSL and not cable internet.) Runs 3rd party voip just fine even with bittorrent running.

    8. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Adelphia was like that (horrible) *before* they went down, at least here. I've heard it's improved now, but I'll never go back to cable when DSL is super reliable (here time warner bought up adelphia though instead of comcast.)

    9. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      As a former Adelphia phone-support tech I can sympathise. The Current comcast sounds VERY much like the former Adelphia. While there were some very skilled and dedicated technicians and support people there, they were totally overpowered by the sheer incompetence of the upper management.

      I worked in the Buffalo call center as a High Speed Internet level 2 phone support tech. We had quite a few very talented and really smart people working there. Unfortunately for us, we were totally hamstrung by the complete lack of proper communication and logistics functions between the various sections of Adelphia. And (particularly towards the end) we didn't really have the tools to repair (or fully diagnose) any serious network issues with any kind of adequate speed.

      Basically we were reduced to troubleshooting minor issues with people's pc's, running automated diagnostics on modems, and if anything looked even remotely like a network problem, we referred that up to the overworked network support group, which customers could not call or talk with, basically leaving them out in the cold while they waited who-knows how long for the problem to be fixed.

      After a while it just became easier to punt, and send out a cable tech if you were in any way uncertain, or were unable to satisfy the customer. I'm just glad I'm out of there, and that Time Warner got the Buffalo region. From what I hear from my buddies still at the call center, things are MUCH better, and they are able to do much more for the customers than we were ever able to do under Adelphia. So at least one cable company seems to be getting it right.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    10. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      That and the HUGEASS buffer on cablemodems makes it impossible to do any kind of QOS.

      Uhh, I was able to get a fairly decent QoS scheme going, using Linux and HTB. The trick is to take the cable modem buffer out of play by refusing to let your connection max out on either the upstream or downstream.

      The way I did it was to limit OUTGOING traffic on my LAN nic to 75% of my total bandwidth and then setup classes within that 75% to break out the traffic. Anything above 75% gets dropped. I might be using more then 75% on the actual cable modem, but in short order TCP is smart enough to slow down and match the speed that I'm allowing on my LAN interface. Short of a ping flood or really badly written udp implementation I don't see what the problem with this type of setup is.

      Upstream I limited to 90%. You can get away with allowing more on the upstream because you have total control over what you send but only limited control (i.e: drop packets and bank on TCP being smart enough to slow down) on what you receive.

      Yeah, you don't get your whole bandwidth. But short of having control over the QoS on their end you will never be able to do any type of QoS scheme and max out your line. If I'm really hell bent on getting my 5mbits (3.75mbits works just fine 99% of the time) I can always disable it for the duration of whatever I'm doing.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by N7DR · · Score: 1
      Either their VoIP cable modem has better QoS than the horrible linksys router Vonage sent me or Comcast uses a different pipeline for their phone service.

      Comcast VoIP is based on PacketCable (www.packetcable.com) -- in a nutshell, this means that they can use special high-quality bandwidth for their calls. Third parties such as Vonage don't have the capability to do the same, basically because the equipment that is needed to use the special bandwidth is owned by the cable company (it's a combination of the cable modem inside the subscriber's Multimedia Terminal Adapter [the "phone modem" that Comcast puts in the subscriber's home] and a device called a Cable Modem Termination System that sits at the operator's end of the access network).

    12. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by mulvane · · Score: 1

      I hear and see this complaint a lot. I had the same complaint for a long time. In my case, it was the cable going to the modem. It had to many splitters in line. It was split just before it came in the house with one end capped off, once it came in it was split with one going to the TV and the other fed into the house, it was split one more time so I could feed the kids room, and still one more time so it could feed the tv in my room and then to the computer room. I was in an apartment at the time but I rewired a lot of things and managed to get the cable modem to be behind just one splitter. I knew I had bad latency, but I never knew how bad the splitters were until I started to investigate the problem more. Didn't help that the distribution box that Comcast serviced on the side of my apt had (counted em), 8 splitters for who knows what in it...

    13. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      I'm halfway through the comments on the article, and you're the first person I've seen trying to stand up for Comcast. I've never been a Comcast customer, but I find that somewhat telling.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    14. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by plover · · Score: 1
      The wiring's definitely not at fault in my case, nor is the internet traffic. I made sure that the cable modem was on the first splitter as the cable entered the house, and I used a good quality high-bandwidth splitter provided by the cable guy. The other side of the splitter terminates in a powered amplifier. My download speeds are consistently excellent, and the modem usually reports 7mbps connections.

      And the house's bandwidth isn't an issue dealing with my current problem, as all the rest of the equipment was unplugged during the calls I was testing. My house is set up so the Vonage-provided router is the first device connected to the cable modem, and the POTS wires come from it. I've contacted Vonage and they've identified the line as a business fax line (it shows up on my router's status, and I assume that's a QoS related setting.) So with as-good-as-I-can-make-them conditions, we get mostly-OK voice, and lousy fax performance. Everybody's done everything they can, and still we have some numbers we can't successfully fax to.

      And if I start up Azureus, well, forget the voice too.

      --
      John
    15. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by mulvane · · Score: 1

      I'd test my upstream bandwidth, and I would put a cheap router that can do QoS and guarantee vonage so much bandwidth. Otherwise, p2p will compete, and usually win the bandwidth war that it wages with other things trying to share it. Also, what kind of ping latency do you get to some random server and then the vonage server? Test this on a couple non vonage ports and then test it with the vonage ports to see if you can tell a diff..

    16. Re:I'm entirely happy with Comcast. by feepness · · Score: 1

      I'm halfway through the comments on the article, and you're the first person I've seen trying to stand up for Comcast. I've never been a Comcast customer, but I find that somewhat telling. Well, here's the key... I use internet and SD TV. No phone. No cable box. SD TV is 25 years old so it's difficult to mess up and like I said, my internet connection is probably less than 3 miles from their offices. I wasn't trying to stand up for them so much as to say if you keep it simple you might be ok.
  6. I'd like to hammer Washington Post by kd3bj · · Score: 1

    I can barely read TFA with all the pop ups and flash pop-overs. Sheesh!

    1. Re:I'd like to hammer Washington Post by ianare · · Score: 1
    2. Re:I'd like to hammer Washington Post by elwin_windleaf · · Score: 1

      One benefit of the Slashdot effect is the ad revenues - maybe they're trying to offset their bandwidth costs?

    3. Re:I'd like to hammer Washington Post by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Do not bother. Classic case of Cable Rage. Happens on a daily basis around the world.

      The interesting bit is at the end - she is no longer a Comcast customer. She is now on Verizon.

      I am very interested on how this has happened. In my experience the only way out of a Cable Company contract prior to its expiry is to be carried out feet forward in a casket. It does not matter do they deliver, how badly it sucks, how badly it fails to work and so on. They still get to collect their money and all regulators and busybodies like the BBB in the US or TS in the UK turn a blind eye on them. Further to this, it is a standard practice for them continue to collect their money even after the contract has expired and has been correctly terminated sending collection agencies and shitting on your credit rating if you do not pay up.

      Personally, I am curious on how much did Verizon pay her for this publicity stunt. Even if they did not do it in advance they surely did it after that to show her as a "happy customer".

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    4. Re:I'd like to hammer Washington Post by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Maybe she said "So, and now lemme out of the contract or next time I'll come with a jackhammer"

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:I'd like to hammer Washington Post by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > In my experience the only way out of a Cable Company contract prior to its expiry is to be carried out feet forward in a casket.

      In my experience, no cable company I've dealt with has a contract. Phone companies do. The cablecos love to point this out in their adverts.

      Granny will be turning the hammer on Verizon any day now. Of course, they've got The Network following her, so they'll probably take her down before she can swing.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  7. coincidence. by User+956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    75-year-old Mona "The Hammer" Shaw took her claw hammer back to the customer service center and bludgeoned the office equipment into tiny plastic pieces.

    Funny story, Tom Delay got his nickname the same way.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:coincidence. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Tom "Hammer" Delay - "God, *Mona*, and the Rise of the Republican Congress"

      There. Fixed it for you.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    2. Re:coincidence. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Funny story, Tom Delay got his nickname [amazon.com] the same way. Really? Wow, learn something every day. I thought it was gay code for... well, better ask Larry Craig to explain.

      Wouldn't it be great if all the closeted gay Republicans could just get together and fuck each other instead of the country?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  8. Oh hammer... by jberryman · · Score: 5, Funny

    is there no problem you can't solve?

    1. Re:Oh hammer... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 4, Funny
      The Old Handyman's Maxim:

      All tools are hammers except chisels which are screwdrivers.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Oh hammer... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      is there no problem you can't solve?

      I'm waiting for a granny to attack with duct-tape and WD-40.

    3. Re:Oh hammer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading the title off the RSS feed, I thought the 75 old lady - a hacking grandma - hammered Concast's servers with network packets. Hey, it's /., the nuts and volts for the nerds. Who'd think it was a literal hammer and the literal act of pounding something with a hammer!

    4. Re:Oh hammer... by RincewindTVD · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know the old saying...
      If all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a messiah.

    5. Re:Oh hammer... by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      chisels & screwdrivers are interchangeable...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    6. Re:Oh hammer... by seanbird · · Score: 1

      My finest chisel is actually paint can opener

  9. I wish I was a little old lady... by SoapBox17 · · Score: 1

    If only I could get away with taking a hammer to equipment in a corporate office building. But something tells me if I had done exactly the same thing she had, I still would have gone to jail (she got 3 months suspended sentence).

    Still, I'm glad she did it. Comcast deserved every minute of it, I'm sure. I never thought it was possible that I would run into the welcoming arms of a telco until the day I got Comcast.

  10. Hammer fund, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shall we? I've got $100/10 hammers with its name on it. Let's get the MC to do PR.

    Awesome, grandma. There is a new sheriff in town, and her name be Mona "the hammer" Shaw!!!

    (hehe, I don't even have cable, and now you know why ;-)

  11. Viva La Revolucion! by Sneakernets · · Score: 0

    Suddenly, Whac-a-Mole has a whole new meaning.

    (damn, if this was AT&T I could have made that joke funny in three ways.)

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
  12. Yay, violence. by StDoodle · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yes, let's use violence to solve our problems. Maybe we should try that in the Middle East, too.

    1. Re:Yay, violence. by binarybum · · Score: 1

      it might work. Even the Iraqi army would be pretty reticent about shooting down an army of grandmas wielding hammers.

      --
      ôó
    2. Re:Yay, violence. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      Talk until you're out of breath and they still ignore you, maybe its time to switch to a hammer.

    3. Re:Yay, violence. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      parking them outside on a bench for hours then telling them that the manager they were waiting for had sneaked out the back door was pretty provocative on Comcast's part, if I were the judge I'd have been itching to get that bitch on a contempt charge.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    4. Re:Yay, violence. by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Well, let's get real. This lady was mistreated and ignored. Faced with this kind of obstruction and utterly dismissive disrespect, some kind of escalation is not only understandable, but probably inevitable.

      Or else you just give up and do nothing. Because Comcast, or whoever it is, doesn't have to pay attention to you.

      If you're going to be sanctimonious, save it for someone who does real harm for no good reason, and not a little old lady, with an impeccable standing in her community BTW, who did nothing more than damage some completely obsolete office equipment to make a point about being, well, unconscionably rude.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    5. Re:Yay, violence. by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      In the spirit of Star Trek diplomacy, "Words don't always solve problems. Sometimes you just have to punch an alien, er, customer service representative in the face."

    6. Re:Yay, violence. by unitron · · Score: 1

      Even the Iraqi army would be pretty reticent about shooting down an army of grandmas wielding hammers.

      Would that be the same Iraqi army that wound up killing Iranian children sent out to be "martyrs"?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    7. Re:Yay, violence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, that's the one.

  13. Well she IS 75 by causality · · Score: 4, Funny

    75-year-old Mona "The Hammer" Shaw took her claw hammer back to the customer service center and bludgeoned the office equipment into tiny plastic pieces."

    She's rather old, so I guess the office equipment was easier for her to catch than the employees.
    --
    It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    1. Re:Well she IS 75 by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was my first thought too... "But officer, you must see that I had no choice but to start hitting the equipment. The employees wouldn't stay still while I got a decent swing".

      I for one welcome our hammer wielding little old overladies.

    2. Re:Well she IS 75 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our hammer wielding little old overladies.

      Seconded. I would especially welcome their visiting Comcast's Charlottesville, Virginia branch office, located at 400 Westfield Road (off 29 North).

    3. Re:Well she IS 75 by Prairiewest · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our hammer wielding little old overladies.
      Oh my God!! Funniest re-use of standard Slashdot expression I've read in months! :) Way to go!
  14. STOP by Sneakernets · · Score: 5, Funny

    HAMMERTIME!

    (now discussion can continue as normal.)

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:STOP by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Interesting? Insightful?!

      Funny yes; the rest of the mods though? /me shakes head sadly.

    2. Re:STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying he threatened the mods with a hammer?

    3. Re:STOP by mstahl · · Score: 1
    4. Re:STOP by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      Someone forgot to follow the flowchart!

    5. Re:STOP by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      HAMMERTIME! Shit, and here I was collaborating and listening. I can never keep this stuff straight.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:STOP by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      HAMMERTIME!

      (now discussion can continue as normal.)


      You are brave to use the RIAA's copyrighted material. I salute You! ;-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    7. Re:STOP by Firrenzi · · Score: 1

      From the album, 'Please Mona, don't hurt 'em '

      Including tracks like:

      Pray
      (you've got to pray, pray
      Pray, pray..

      You've got pray she gets her tv today)

      --
      The Tao that can be named is not the Tao
  15. Missing tag for story by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    'easyhack'

    or

    '!hardhack'

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  16. Gotta love the older folks, they remember America by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... when it was good :) When service matters, when companies gave a dam... when people gave a dam doing their jobs...

    I say we arm our elderly and let them take back this country. They stood up in ww2, and they might be feeling up to it again.

  17. Mona's Old Claw Hammer by kongit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comcast's miserable but completely irresitable
    Bringing TV to the home
    Late nights all alone with the boob tube
    Ohh-oh-oh-oh...

    Mona shaw is getting really raw
    and calls them on the phone
    "can you fix my cable you
    I-dee-ots?"

    But she's getting nowhere
    so she takes her hammer there...


    Bang, bang, Mona's old claw hammer
    Came down upon their stuff
    Bang, bang, Mona's old claw hammer
    Made their office look real rough

    1. Re:Mona's Old Claw Hammer by drcagn · · Score: 1

      Oh man, if only I had mod points.... X-D

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    2. Re:Mona's Old Claw Hammer by PlatyPaul · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had a hammer
      Comcast would be running
      Comcast would be screaming
      All over this land
      I'd hammer their servers
      I'd hammer their call desk
      I'd hammer their bullshit-filled customer service
      All over this land

      If I had an Uzi....

      (with my apologies to Pete Seeger and Lee Hays)

      --
      Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  18. Consumer Rights by ChemE · · Score: 1

    Let's here it for Consumers Rights!

    1. Re:Consumer Rights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's here it for Consumers Rights!
      After the horrors of they're/there/their and lose/loose, The art of spelling suffers another crippling blow.

      Seriously, man. Read a book every once in a while.
  19. Dish in wind storm by baomike · · Score: 1

    >
    Likely the same storm we had in the Willamette Valley. two Dish network dishes and 90cm for "other" came thru OK. I expected no less. The trick is to not mount them on top of the house. Dishes do not need to be high like a TV antennae. They need only a clear view of a portion of the sky

    1. Re:Dish in wind storm by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. Mount them on the side if you can. I've never had problems from wind. Now severe rain can cause rain fade problems, but wind shouldn't if you mounted the dish correctly. It takes a lot of force to create significant flexing of a 3 inch piece of steel pipe that's only three feet long....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  20. Why? by false_cause · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is Comcast still the only option for my friends who live in Arlington County? Why is Cox my only option in Fairfax County? I have endless complaints about Cox and my friends in Arlington have their's about Comcast. Wouldn't some competition between the two be likely to press these megacorps to resolve a few of the issues?

    1. Re:Why? by Steeltalon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because municipalities decided that they should only have one cable company in most cases and the courts decided that the cable companies don't need to share their bandwidth despite being granted a state funded monopoly.

      --
      Regards, Ian
    2. Re:Why? by false_cause · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those decisions don't appear to be benefiting me, the consumer/customer/voter. Shocking, I know.

    3. Re:Why? by crucini · · Score: 1

      The problem is, installing cable TV in a town is a big and risky investment. The cable company normally demands a "franchise", meaning a monopoly on cable access in the town. Without the franchise, the investment is less likely to pay off; therefore it's probably impossible to attract a cable company without offering exclusivity.

    4. Re:Why? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Neah, they will just merge

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    5. Re:Why? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Its because Comcast and Cox spend your money (i.e. the money you pay for cable) ensuring that competition never happens.

    6. Re:Why? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      Yet I can cancel my phone service with one company and choose a different carrier willy-nilly. The difference between the two being.. hmm.. yeah.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    7. Re:Why? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      I always thought so, but no.

      Here we have Comcast, WOW and SBC. They all still hate consumers... they just have company.

    8. Re:Why? by Drive42 · · Score: 0

      Because shit is fucked up. Fix it. Don't let this comment be the last thing you do about it.

    9. Re:Why? by Steeltalon · · Score: 1

      Well, in my opinion there is no difference. however, where the powers that be are concerned, the difference is that the cable is put out there without government subsidies (I think). The phone lines were specifically built as a result of government action. That said, while the government isn't paying for cable infrastructure, they are the ones who allowed only one owner in a municipality, so I think it should be a requirement that the bandwidth owners lease at a reasonable rate to competitors.

      --
      Regards, Ian
    10. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense but... because you live in America? I think that solves your answer.

      Greetings from Europe.

    11. Re:Why? by Nesa2 · · Score: 1

      In Canada we have this organization called Better Business Bureau. I think you have it in US as well. I'm not sure how great they are helping consumers, but I've worked in a place where we received a letter from them stating complaints from a customer. Eventually the manager had to refund the money and play nice with the customer. He seemed pretty scared and annoyed when he initially received the letter. They mediated every reply from him and the customer passing them along.

    12. Re:Why? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      The BBB does nothing of the sort in the USA. All they do is collect complaints. With enough of them, they can revoke a business's BBB Seal of Approval, if they ever bothered to display one -- the vast majority don't.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  21. funny by lecithin · · Score: 1

    I was just at the /. party in MN, at Vibrant.

    We took a hammer to many pieces of hardware.

    It was a good feeling to hit that old E-250.

    I'd love to take it to Comcast.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
  22. Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by jroysdon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I always wondered why my local Comcast office was behind plexiglass (bullet-proof?). The Post Office down the street has no such physical barriers. I guess Comcast is used to dealing with this sort of response to their customer dis-service. The Post Office is slow and all, but at least you get what they promise. I just wish Comcast could get their programming guide data fixed. I lost a few channels that they block now with their filter. I can still most of one, and a hazy version of another. Comcast's solution? Upgrade my package to digital and pay $40 more a month for the two channels I want. No thanks. OTA looks better and better if there was just another high-speed internet player in the market.

    Comcast high-speed internet (without CableTV): $61
    Comcast mini-basic CableTV ($15) + high-speed internet: $60

    What a racket, eh? It's cheaper to get their mini-basic CableTV and internet than to just get internet solo. Not by much, of course. I wish I could just get high-speed internet for $45 and then that'd be motivation enough to get a nice OTA setup going.

    1. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I'm glad someone pointed the bullet-proof glass thing. There are plenty of banks that put no glass between tellers and their customers. But I have known 3 cable outfits, in Pittsburgh, NJ, and D.C., all of whom bullet-proof their offices like they expect all the terrorists in Iraq to storm the gates. For what? A coupla cable boxes? Seriously, this kind of armor costs money. The only reason they'd spend it is because they EXPECT customers to be furious at them. I mean, there are people at Comcast who discussed this, concluding they need to protect themselves from... well... their customers. Uhh, they don't see a problem with this? I gotta hint for you cable companies... if you gotta hide from your subscribers behind bullet-proof glass and steel drawers, the problem is YOU. Of course, maybe Fort Knox security is cheaper than friendly customer service...

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    2. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by budgenator · · Score: 1

      That's what I did, then a lightning storm blow out the filter and I'm getting all the chanels that were supposed to be blocked anyway.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by astrotek · · Score: 1

      You pay taxes on TV so the $61 for just internet is always cheaper than $60 pre tax TV+internet.

    4. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Funny

      So actually they have to PAY YOU $1 for you to watch their CableTV. It's so much crap it has negative value.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    5. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by eharvill · · Score: 1

      Comcast high-speed internet (without CableTV): $61 Comcast mini-basic CableTV ($15) + high-speed internet: $60 What a racket, eh? It's cheaper to get their mini-basic CableTV and internet than to just get internet solo. Not by much, of course. I wish I could just get high-speed internet for $45 and then that'd be motivation enough to get a nice OTA setup going. Not exactly. Apparently if they run internet over the lines, you get the "mini-basic" cable regardless. They have no way of filtering that out. Crappy yes, but I understand why they do it.
      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    6. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by rho · · Score: 1

      That's not standard, I don't think. We have Internet-only and it's about $50 including taxes. That could be a grandfathered-in price as we used to be Time Warner RoadRunner, but I seem to recall seeing that price elsewhere.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    7. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
      "I always wondered why my local Comcast office was behind plexiglass (bullet-proof?). The Post Office down the street has no such physical barriers."
      • When choosing someplace to rob, people consider the $60+ cable bills people pay rather than the occasional $10 book of stamps, not to mention the expensive equipment that changes hands
      • The people that go into the office to pay their bill tend to be the poor/desperate type that can't get a checking account with which to pay their bills by mail, while standing in line at the post office is the great equalizer and knows no class distinctions
      • Comcast doesn't have its own armed federal agents on site.
    8. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      No, I stated my total bill, including taxes. 3 years ago Comcast called me up to get me to sign up for cabletv (as I had internet-only). I said the only way I'd do it is if it was cheaper. The guy ran the math, and with the taxes it is cheaper (by about $0.70, but enough to round them to different numbers). I've been careful to double check it and make sure it's not going up periodically.

    9. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wondered why my local Comcast office was behind plexiglass (bullet-proof?). The Post Office down the street has no such physical barriers.

      It would do no good to install bullet-proof plexiglass at the Post Office, since the most-likely shooter would already be behind it.

    10. Re:Local Comcast office vs. Post Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check with your wireless carriers. 3g is not bad at all if you're not into file sharing.

  23. Comcast Service by miracle69 · · Score: 1

    It's Crapcastic!!!

    --
    Linux - Because Mommy taught me to Share.
  24. Does she have a fund? by Belacgod · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd contribute to paying her fine for her.

    1. Re:Does she have a fund? by sskinnider · · Score: 1

      I'd pay to have her come to New York to Hammer my local Cablevision office.

    2. Re:Does she have a fund? by powerlord · · Score: 1

      Forget paying her fine, I want to know if she's thought about Franchising Opportunities.

      --
      This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
  25. Re:"I can't decide whether you shoud live or die.. by Speedracer1870 · · Score: 1

    I should introduce her to my grandmother. More grandma's should be wielding claw hammers. Bingo would be so much more interesting...

  26. That's not all... by SailorSpork · · Score: 5, Funny

    The best part about the article is the end, when the police fine her $345 (likely less than the cost of the equipment she smashed) and gave her the hammer back. Is there a lighter slap-on-the-wrist punishment? The police must be Comcast subscribers too.

    1. Re:That's not all... by butlerm · · Score: 1

      I am sure she will be sent a bill for the damage she caused, and if she doesn't pay up she will likely face a civil suit for the same.

    2. Re:That's not all... by Aczlan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      she could sell the hammer on eBay... it would probably bring in enough to more than pay for the equipment she destroyed... Aaron Z

      --
      "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote
    3. Re:That's not all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best. $345. Ever. Spent.

    4. Re:That's not all... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      They did fine her $345, but not for smashing comcast equipment but for wearing baggy pants! The humanity!

    5. Re:That's not all... by swillden · · Score: 1

      I am sure she will be sent a bill for the damage she caused, and if she doesn't pay up she will likely face a civil suit for the same.

      The article says the fine was in restitution, so the money went to Comcast. I think she's paid what she's gonna pay.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re:That's not all... by gaspar+ilom · · Score: 2, Funny

      She would, but she is experiencing difficulty getting online.

  27. Mom? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
    Have you seen my hammer?

    Actually Comcast has been great in this area. But then again that's because they're being compared against the Verizon.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Mom? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      You must live near me.

      We had Verizon for YEARS. I laughed at my friends back in the day who had Comcast -- every night around prime-time, we'd be playing some FPS or another and whoops, there they go lagging out again. Sure, when they were up they had a better connection than me, but mine was STABLE.

      Hmm. Then it started going out on me. Then our DSL modem fried. Got a new one. That lasted not even a quarter the time the first one did.. but they still wouldn't replace it. So after bitching for a few months, we switched to Comcast, which seems to have solved their late evening crashing. All because Verizon's tech help was too stupid to realize that although our modem was working fine maybe 66% of the time, that meant it WASN'T working right and they continually refused to replace it. Dang. Dropped their phone, too, have that through comcast.. because it was just cheaper. Heck, don't use the landline much anyway.

      Boy, it'd be great if the cable and phone companies didn't have all these mini-monopolies. I'd like to actually be able to choose between providers.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    2. Re:Mom? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      My wife was on hold close to 14 hours to cancel our Verizon phone service. They have been loathed ever since for that and more...

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  28. Damn... by KCStein · · Score: 0

    it feels good to be a gangster.

    --
    Sharper than the edge of Ockham's Razor.
  29. Because violence solves everything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hooray for physical violence, it solves everything.

    1. Re:Because violence solves everything by franksands · · Score: 1

      You know what they say: Violence is not the answer, it's the question. The answer is YES.

  30. Old news by CJ145 · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Old news by theproff · · Score: 1

      We would have seen it earlier, but... you know... the servers were hammered.

  31. Tiger by Paul_Hindt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry Roger, you tiger now.

    1. Re:Tiger by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Only in Soviet Russia!

    2. Re:Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent comment wins.

    3. Re:Tiger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    When you could spell damn out in full without worrying about the blasphemy police....

  33. The Elderly by gaelfx · · Score: 4, Funny

    How many times must people be told? Don't mess with the elderly! I mean, these people actually go out and vote. You just watch, one day there will be a curfew and all those under 70 will be in-home, lights-out at 5:30 sharp.

  34. Time for a Paypal fund to pay the fine. by jk379 · · Score: 1

    Time for a Paypal fund to pay the fine?

    1. Re:Time for a Paypal fund to pay the fine. by 6031769 · · Score: 1

      Using Paypal to support an individual's crusade against poor customer service and corporate indifference? You, sir, owe me a brand new irony detector!

      --
      Burns: We're building a casino!
      McAllister: Arrr. Give me 5 minutes.
  35. Feeling rebelious by GregPK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having lived through 3 different cable providers giving me the same service. Started with TCI, then moved to ATT, then moved to Comcast. I'd have to say I'm the least satisfied with Comcast out of all three. I hate thier customer service. Thier CRM setup is a complete joke. Personally, I think the woman is a hero, If she had a paypal posted I'd send a buck for making my day. Comcast should have this happen in every one of thier offices every single day until they get the point. Treat thier customers right.

  36. Re:"I can't decide whether you shoud live or die.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    > > (( Little Old Lady Hammers Comcast ))
    > > Posted by CowboyNeal on Thursday October 18, @11:29PM
    >
    > by amccaf1 (813772) on Thursday October 18, @11:35PM (#21036061)
    > I can't figure out whether I want to go out and smash office equipment with a hammer, or I want this woman to come in and smash my office equipment with a hammer.

    Zero to Rule 34 in six minutes. Impressive!

  37. Re:Go slashdot by timelorde · · Score: 1

    Time of this event hitting the Washington Post: today!

  38. Maybe someone shoudl sent SWAT team by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soemone break into 911 and sent a SWAT team to some home, maybe they should have sent it to COMCAST headquarter and arrest everyone there instead

    bahaha

  39. CrapCast by hottoh · · Score: 1

    I have called comcast 'crapcast' for about 2 years, and I was a loyal customer of comcast from 2000 to 2005.

    Comcast has too many failings, and several people in my neighborhood switched to u-verse http://www.att.com/gen/press-room?pid=5838

    I was and am sick of Comcast, and I never intend to go back to them. They were the only game in town in 2000, and now they are not. Now they look like a dinosaur by comparison. I think it is Very sad when nearly all choices look better than comcasts offerings. Hell they lost to the the typical last place finisher, AT&T!

  40. CANT TOUCH THIS! by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its copyrighted and I fear lawyers from the RIAA

    --
    See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    1. Re:CANT TOUCH THIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, he touched it, alright... he ripped it off from Rick James!

  41. Somebody Could Design a Hammer T-Shirt! by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    Brave Mrs. Shaw and her hammer of justice could be the poster-lady for a new movement of assertive consumers.

    Proceeds go to her legal fees, and whatever else her kind heart desires. Shux! I'd buy two (XL, please) and wear 'em with pride!

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    1. Re:Somebody Could Design a Hammer T-Shirt! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You mean like this one?
      http://www.threadpit.com/store/product.php?productid=7&goog=cccp

      In Soviet Russia little old ladies hammer you... not...

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  42. She looks like. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    she could catch your sorry fat ass any day of the week, without any trouble. So, watch your mouth, sonny! --AC

  43. Go lady go lady go lady go... by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Its the little old lady from Pasadena...

    Only a 75 year old white lady can get away with something like that. If it was a 15 to 25 year old black male, then he would already be in Gitmo...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by 808140 · · Score: 1

      And this gets flamebait why, exactly? What he's saying is completely true.

    2. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 1

      You are exageration (as other already said, there is no amrican black male in Gitmo(yet) and that lady was fined, even if it was for a rather small value), but you are right. Violence from someone you expect to be violent is nothing more than that, to become a message, it has to be shockingly unexpected.

    3. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh please, don't exaggerate. Generally you're right, but you overdo it.

      He'd be shot, beaten and then left to die, that's all.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by Jivecat · · Score: 1

      Only a 75 year old white lady can get away with something like that. If it was a 15 to 25 year old black male, then he would already be in Gitmo...

      That comment is ageist, sexist, and racist. Way to hit the trifecta.

      If it were possible for a 15-year-old black male to have already had a long career with the Air Force as a registered nurse, and had a husband who has similarly served his country, he'd probably get the same slap on the wrist. Being a military veteran can get you a lot of slack from the cops, many of whom are vets too.

      --
      "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
    5. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And that's a problem. The little old lady should be in Gitmo too.

    6. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would they bury him at Gitmo?

    7. Re:Go lady go lady go lady go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, I wanted to take time out of my day to tell you what a fucking nigger nutsack you are. I will pray for your speedy demise in a fire.

      Thank you and have a terrible life.

  44. Re:"I can't decide whether you shoud live or die.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two point penalty: inappropriate use of an apostrophe.

  45. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by iminplaya · · Score: 1

    I don't know. Imagine one of those old timers holding up an M-60 like Rambo and wildly spinning around while firing the thing.

    --
    What?
  46. The Solution is Clear. by Death_Aparatus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Stop watching T.V. I haven't owned a television in almost a decade. Feels great.

    1. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Stop watching T.V. I haven't owned a television in almost a decade. Feels great.

      Hear Hear!

      I remember the cable company calling me up shortly after I'd moved into a new place. I'd not automatically called them up to turn my co-ax on.

      "We notice that you haven't activated your cable yet, sir. We can take care of that right away! What sort of package would you like to have, sir? "

      "None. I don't want to watch TV, thanks."

      Confused silence. (I really think that the sales guy had never contemplated life without cable before.) Then, "Why not?"

      "Because TV sucks and people who watch it are losers. --In the sense that they are losing out on hundreds of hours of life every year, missing out on personal growth, and falling behind in their mental development. Have you noticed how so many people act like adolescents in their thinking patterns until well into adulthood and beyond. I don't want to be a loser."

      "Oh."

      "Do you watch TV?" (I was feeling perky and pesky.)

      "Um, yes."

      "You might want to reconsider your life. Have a nice day!" Click.

      The amazing thing is that TV really wants to be in your life. I had to bat away offers and pressing arguments from friends, and in the end, the cable company just ended up providing free cable even though I didn't want or ask for it, (and certainly didn't pay for it.) Luckily my life had become so robust and interesting with all those extra hours filled with actual living that it was very easy not to turn the crack-tube back on again. These days I don't even own a television set.

      Most poignant memory with regard to TV: Walking home one night and passing a three story apartment complex with virtually every window flickering that creepy blue TV light. It looked like a damned Borg cube, an analogy which, I thought, worked on several levels.

      Beware the Zombie Nation.


      -FL

    2. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All things in moderation. Generally people who totally shun something or turn vehemently anti-whatever do this because they are afraid of not being able to control themselves. TV is OK in moderation. I mean it's not like it is going to turn you into a zombie for watching 30 minutes.

      A good PVR system so you can watch at your leisure and you're all set. I watch maybe 2 hours per week of mostly old re-runs that I have on the PVR. It's nice when you're alone and you just want to eat dinner, relax and watch a few minutes of TV. No big deal.

      I like the History channel too. All the information is available from other sources but the TV makes it short and easy to digest. Just light information, it's good sometimes.

    3. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      All things in moderation. Generally people who totally shun something or turn vehemently anti-whatever do this because they are afraid of not being able to control themselves. TV is OK in moderation. I mean it's not like it is going to turn you into a zombie for watching 30 minutes.

      TV had the potential to do a lot of good, but that ball wasn't just dropped; it was hurled out the nearest window.

      The fluorescing screen is instrumental in dropping viewers into a dissociative state akin to hypnosis. This is measurable, and indeed has been measured using good old EEG technology. You've no doubt heard the details at some point in your life with regard to the physiological and psychological changes which take place almost immediately upon settling in for an evening of viewing. Suffice it to say that there is a reason people regularly cannot remember the last commercial advertisement they just viewed thirty seconds ago. --All of that in conjunction wth the audio messages which play over an active television have direct access to the subconscious. No matter how aware one is, the programming happens. No amount of TV viewing is 'safe', because the sinister messages flow at a constant rate and no amount of will power or critical discernment can prevent them from affecting you. --So yes, I do tend to have a somewhat vehement attitude toward having my awareness 'sculpted'. It's best to just steer clear altogether. In any case, with computer screens these days, with cold cathode lighting, and the ability to choose and filter the messages, I see very few valid reasons for having a television or a cable subscription.

      And nice, light, conveniently packaged programming is generally provided by those for whom money is god, and that means you'll never get a full or accurate view of reality through regular TV broadcasting. Everybody, and I mean everybody I know who watches TV is sickly and appears to be functioning most of the time as though their brains are full of glue --Whereas the people I have met who have accumulated and wield significant personal power are those who have unplugged. Yes, that's just my experience, but it is a pattern I have seen repeated time and time again. I can usually, after being around somebody for a few minutes tell you whether or not they are regular television viewers. But like I said, that's just me. Perhaps you're different.


      -FL

    4. Re:The Solution is Clear. by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Comcast provides more than TV, and the lady's problems were with a lot of that stuff, as are most people's.

    5. Re:The Solution is Clear. by RegTooLate · · Score: 1

      So basically instead of being a Zombie and watching TV. Your a zombie that posts to slashdot all day.

    6. Re:The Solution is Clear. by MindspanConsultants · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Interesting that your most poignant memory with regard to TV, in opposition to it, elicited scenes actually drawn from a television program. You will be assimilated... er it seems you already have been.

    7. Re:The Solution is Clear. by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      All of that in conjunction wth the audio messages which play over an active television have direct access to the subconscious. No matter how aware one is, the programming happens. No amount of TV viewing is 'safe', because the sinister messages flow at a constant rate and no amount of will power or critical discernment can prevent them from affecting you.
      I see you've taken the time you would have spent watching tv and invested it into becoming completely batshit fucking insane.
      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    8. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Xeth · · Score: 1

      It looked like a damned Borg cube, an analogy which, I thought, worked on several levels.


      I'm sorry, I'm afraid I don't get it. Perhaps it makes reference to something that I, someone who doesn't watch TV, am not familiar with?
      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    9. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ""Because TV sucks and people who watch it are losers. --In the sense that they are losing out on hundreds of hours of life every year, missing out on personal growth, and falling behind in their mental development. Have you noticed how so many people act like adolescents in their thinking patterns until well into adulthood and beyond. I don't want to be a loser.""

      Then why are you Slashdot? Or even the Internet at all? You're missing out.

    10. Re:The Solution is Clear. by vimh42 · · Score: 1

      But then again, you're sitting here reading and posting on Slashdot. What was your argument again?

    11. Re:The Solution is Clear. by kgskgs · · Score: 1

      Could not agree more with you.

      I don't have a TV for 7 years. Could not have been happier about it.

      Just a couple of months back, this conversation took place.

      "Hello sir, this is the cable company. blah..blah.. cheap cable.. blah blah ... more channels than anybody.. blah blah... manager special discount only for today.."
      "Sorry, I don't have a TV."
      "You don't have what?"
      "I don't have a TV."
      (long pause at the other end)
      "Well, in that case I don't know how to sell you this cable package."
      "Good. Thank you."

      Forget all the wonderful hours of my life that I spent living instead of watching, the sheer kick I got out of that long pause was worth seven years of abstinence.

    12. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Least you got the internet. Ohh sweet smokeless internet.

    13. Re:The Solution is Clear. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zombie Nation is a weird weird WEIRD game for the Nintendo Entertainment System(NES), The last game listed alphabetically, I believe.

  47. Only a hammer? by CBob · · Score: 1

    Given that Comcrap managed to brick a 3Com OfficeConnect modem I owned when they attempted to flash it remotely w/their firmware and then told me I had to buy a new modem, I'd say a hammer was a nice start. This was after 2 years of having to tell the phone "support" how to do their jobs every time we lost our ip address when the renew got screwed up. If it weren't for the support crew that was in Canada, I'd have dropped them *much* sooner.

    Yes, I bought a new modem...It was one for DSL.

  48. In Korea by name*censored* · · Score: 1
    Only old people attack comcast!

    (How did anyone not say this yet?)
    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  49. ComCast alleged customer service by meburke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have some customers who use ComCast now that they own Houston's RoadRunner customers. (That is not really a typo...) I had occasion to call ComCast the other day asking for technical assistance for a customer replacing their Linksys Wireless cable gateway. Comcast told me they would have to fill out a form with the new MAC address and the account would be updated in 5-7 days. After an hour of being transferred around I finally found someone who updated the account MAC address in 5 minutes. Then I asked for the DNS address of the nameservers. They told me they didn't support DNS. I got transferred to four people who didn't have a CLUE about Windows XP needing a nameserver address (if you have a static IP, even if it's an internal NAT address) before I finally simply hung up, set the workstation to DHCP and derived a DNS address from ipconfig.

    There is such an abundance of crappy customer service out there you would think that any company that provides outstanding (or even reasonable) customer service could steal the market.

    My biggest advice for companies wanting to reduce the cost of customer service is, "Clean it up upstream." Don't put out crappy products and you will have fewer customer service problems. This means solid design and VERY good documentation, plus some solid troubleshooting tips. Then pay your customer support techs better money, give them a nice place to work, and reward them for SOLVING PROBLEMS instead of just closing tickets or answering calls. (This means the customer support function needs to be "designed" instead of just being an afterthought.) Provide constant and high-quality training and alternative ways for the customer to get support, and for God's sake, ANSWER THE PHONE!

    I ask my customers, "On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate our service?" Then I ask, "What would it take to make it a 10?" I have managed to retain some really loyal customers this way, and I have dropped services I can't provide good service for. Noone can please everyone, so I have also dropped customers who are impossible to please. Cleaning it up upstream for me (an integrator) means clarifying the scope of work and the customer expectations before I start the job. I also evaluate the customer's reasons for wanting my services. Many times they are trying to solve a problem by "jumping to solutions", and I have saved customers a lot of money and grief by helping them troubleshoot the whole problem before committing to help. It takes more time, but it prevents hassles downstream.

    --
    "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    1. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1

      There is such an abundance of crappy customer service out there you would think that any company that provides outstanding (or even reasonable) customer service could steal the market.

      Nope. Shoddy companies like that are also not below lying in their ads (or press statements for that matter), spreading FUD about their competition, and lobbying to reduce all those 'regulations' keeping them from doing worse things to citizens, etc. If they can't beat the competition, then make anything else just seem worse.

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    2. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most routers will let you specify their address for DNS. So, if the router is 192.168.0.1, just specify 192.168.0.1 as the DNS on client computers and the router will forward the request appropriately to the DHCP'd DNS it gets from the ISP. That way you don't have to keep track of the ISP's DNS and set them manaully on all the clients.

    3. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by bmajik · · Score: 1

      There is such an abundance of crappy customer service out there you would think that any company that provides outstanding (or even reasonable) customer service could steal the market.


      You'd think that, but then you'd wake up and realize that the government red tape involved in running something like a cable company is of such epic proportions that there is no competition whatsoever, and no possible entry into the market.

      Want to start a wireless TV service? Sorry -- the FCC -- bought and paid for by incumbent businesses -- says no thanks.

      The cable, telco, and wireless co's in this country are so fucking awful because they have no real competition, due entirely to government favoritism and regulation.

      We either need an overbearing accountable regulatory body, or we need none at all and a truly open market. What we have is the worst of both -- an over regulated UNACCOUNTABLE body, staffed by the hand chosen flunkies of whatever politician or company-man (who are usually one in the same) is working on getting somewhere on the backs of others.

      Our government is the cause of essentially every problem we face societally, as it is the only instrument that limits ultimate choice -- by gunpoint if necessary.
      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    4. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slightly off topic, but .... is it me or has the country, government and bureaucracy turned from a tool to protect citizens against exploitative practices of companies into a tool ensuring that large companies won't have to worry about competition?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by barzok · · Score: 3, Informative

      So don't use their DNS in the first place. My RoadRunner connection was terrible (slow, sites unavailable, etc.) until I figured out that the problem wasn't the connection but rather their awful DNS servers. I switched to use other DNS servers and my service was instantly usable again.

    6. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is such an abundance of crappy customer service out there you would think that any company that provides outstanding (or even reasonable) customer service could steal the market.

      Aside from the barriers to market entry noted by another poster, you'd also find that encounters with support are, for most people, infrequent. Since much of the internet is magic to those people, missing web sites, slow connections, even periodic loss of net access, is just one of those things that happen. They do something else for an hour or a day. They may be ready to quit their ISP after four hours on hold, but by the next day, they calm down, realize that quitting would require the horrible, 2-6 week process of joining a new ISP, get distracted by the latest TV-news car chase, or just plain forget.

      I suspect some ISPs may intentionally make starting up so painful that their customer never wants to repeat the process.
    7. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      It's not you. It's just you who thinks it wasn't that way to begin with. ;)

    8. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by bmajik · · Score: 1

      is it me or has the country, government and bureaucracy turned from a tool to protect citizens against exploitative practices of companies into a tool ensuring that large companies won't have to worry about competition?


      The government has done what it has always done -- it's allowed those who hold influence to manipulate the rules to the disadvantage of those that don't hold influence.

      A problem in early mercantile europe was the establishment of craft/skill/trade guilds. Normally this sort of thing isn't a problem, except that the guild leaders got the governments of each town to back them, allowing them to enforce exclusivity rules, tariffs, and so on. This was great for the guild members and bad for the non-members. It protected the incumbents and shut out innovation. Generally this is bad for the population over-all (competition fosters progress and lowers prices, generally)

      Businesses, in general, have more money to throw at politicians, and are more sensible "investors" in politicians.

      It would be inaccurate to describe our government as "pro-business" or "pandering to business". The left hand taxes businesses with one of the highest business tax rates _in the world_. The legal climate here (massive settlements against companies), the "windfall profit" type laws, the backdoor legislation-via-regulation... all of these are ostensibly anti-business. But the more nefarious situations are anti-most-business, but pro-incumbent. So while on one hand, we make it pretty difficult to run a business in this country, on the other, we make it really easy for _certain_ businesses to get filthy rich via government manipulation in the market.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    9. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, guilds also served a purpose for the customers. They were quite concerned with quality and if you didn't follow the rules and tried to cut corners, you quickly found yourself being kicked out and thus jobless. In turn, they got area protection and other benefits.

      That it got out of hand when the guild leaders started to wield significant political power is a different matter. But guilds themselves aren't the evil you make out of them. Sometimes, especially when you wonder again why someone may call himself a "professional" when he knows less about the subject than you do, you really wish something like this existed again.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by avengerp · · Score: 1

      As for companies that provide outstanding service, I have had such a rare experience. I used to live in Austin, TX, where there is widespread coverage by a company called Grande Communications. They serve at least Austin, San Antonio and I think a couple other towns, now, in Texas. Grande was awesome. In January, I moved to Seattle for a job. Had to get Comcast. Waiting for FiOS. Grande's prices weren't that much better than Comcast, but looking back, it was more than worth it. The internet service was impeccably fast, and never went down. The TV menu never had the freeze-ups that Comcast has. Programs were correctly marked 'new' or 'rerun', and in addition there was an option to record a series, "only in this time slot". When you called Grande for anything, the service was awesome. Always a clean cut, bright service guy who looked fresh out of college (even if he wasn't). Hell, even when they called me because of late payment, which happened a few times, they would thank me for being their customer, and said it like they meant it too. If you didn't want to wait for service, say to switch out the cable box, you could just drive up to their office and they'd give you a new one. You lost the power cord? "No problem, this one has a new one." I wish that Austin had Comcast, so everyone could stick it to Comcast. But hey, Time Warner has some bad karma too. Now we just need some competition for the Austin electric & water companies. I don't care how bad Comcast has been, the Austin Energy guys were true Nazis.

    11. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Why would you assume that quality isn't a self-selecting virtue in the marketplace?

      While it may be that many customers might prefer lower quality products than what the guild members might provide, I don't see how that is intrinsically wrong.

      Essentially the behavior of such a guild would be "we'd rather you not have this at all rather than you ahve a lesser quality version of it"

      It's hard for me to see this line of thinking coming out of altruistic concern for the well being of the customer...

      There are a wide number of price/quality trade-points that a market can sustain. But there are only a few price/quality trade-points that incumbent providers can sustain profitably.

      Regulatory agencies in the US are always the same. I've never seen the victim of a shoddy plumber demanding that plumbers must be licensed and regulated (by other incumbent plumbers, of course). But I see plenty of plumbers, teachers, doctors, and so on suggesting legal means to limit who can or cannot engage in their chosen profession. I fully concede that plumbers probably have a good idea of who does or doesn't do a good job plumbing, but that doesn't adddress the inherent conflict of interest, and the reality that it is always the incumbents and rarely the "consumers" that ask for regulation.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    12. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Why would you assume that quality isn't a self-selecting virtue in the marketplace?

      Because of a lack of total information. Quality isn't something tangible. You can't measure it. You can't use it as something the customer can verify in your ads. When you say you're the cheapest, your customer can check against the competition's prices and verify it. When you say that 9 out of 10 of your customers are 100% satisfied, you could lie and nobody could check.

      Yes, there are customer information pages and services and whatnot, but not everyone reads them. So even if your service or product is shoddy, you will have customers as long as you manage to throw your crap cheaply onto the market.

      Now, I wonder, is that what we want? Do we not care about quality as long as it's dirt cheap?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by meburke · · Score: 1

      You might be on to something here... I don't agree that quality can't be measured (Deming proved that it could in Japan), but I do agree that businesses with real good service are not communicating that difference to potential customers in a way that counts. This would be a good area to think on...

      --
      "The mind works quicker than you think!"
    14. Re:ComCast alleged customer service by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, even if quality can be measured, people don't know that. They don't understand figures and arbitrary numbers. But they do understand money.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  50. White Alert by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work in IT for a cable company, and whenever a customer went bizerk in the customer service office, a white clicking light would flash in most offices and pre-designated "bouncers", mostly employee volunteers, would walk briskly down the hall toward the service area. The theory was that large quantities of large people would make customers think twice about violence.

    1. Re:White Alert by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

      Large people are easier for the bullets to find.

    2. Re:White Alert by pcgc1xn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I can understand that there are nutbars everywhere, and you have to be careful of them, your comment stuns me.

      Something about the cable company was bad enough to send enough people crazy.
      Management decided that this was not good.
      So they decided to come up with a process to deal with people who go non-linear in your office?

      Wouldn't it have been better to fix whatever the company was doing to drive them insane?

    3. Re:White Alert by kingsack · · Score: 1

      Interesting but did it ever occur to the company that some of the resources that were devoted to you interesting "alarm system" might have been better devoted to correcting the service failings that were so bad that they were driving your customers to conteplate turning to physical violence?

    4. Re:White Alert by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I was not necessarily condoning such. Further, no matter how good the service, there will *always* be some irrate customers when dealing with millions of people.

    5. Re:White Alert by lysse · · Score: 1

      And because of their increased surface area, they also make easier targets. How thoughtful.

    6. Re:White Alert by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      That's a charitable account. Mine would have been, "the theory was that large quantities of large people would intimidate dissatisfied customers, making it easier for us to avoid dealing with them".

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
  51. customer service by intthis · · Score: 1

    my local comcast office is hidden behind a giant strip mall... and surrounded by a barbed wire fence... seems pretty ridiculous for a company with 25 million satisfied customers...

    --
    now is the winter of our discotheque
  52. Tivo is cheaper than you think by JeffBean · · Score: 1

    Shell out $800 + $12.95 a month for a dual tuner HD TiVO with Cable Card. The Tivo HD box released this summer costs $300, not $800. The Tivo service fee gets as low as $8.33 a month if you prepay 3 years in advance. Here in Phoenix (Cox cable) the cable card rental is $2 (you only need one if it is a multistream card). So your monthly cost is $10.33. Cox's HD DVR costs $18.00 a month plus a $5.00 "service" fee. So if you amortize it over three years, the Tivo DVR and service costs less than the Cox DVR. And it works very well indeed.
    1. Re:Tivo is cheaper than you think by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Cox's HD DVR costs $18.00 a month plus a $5.00 "service" fee. So if you amortize it over three years, the Tivo DVR and service costs less than the Cox DVR. My Cox DVR is almost free when you purchase HD service. I'm already paying over 100 a month for cable and internet, so I'm not inclined to get TiVo. Except for the fact that the Cox DVR is HORRIBLE. I would settle for any DVR that worked, but half the time it just erases all my scheduled recordings for no reason. And recording Private Practice by name (for instance) can require you to scroll through tens of pages of Programo Pagado, only to find out you're on today's episode so the record button doesn't work. As soon as I get the energy, that thing is going back to Cox. Of course who knows what they charge for CableCards...
    2. Re:Tivo is cheaper than you think by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      Um yeah. You get what you pay for. Any "almost free" type system is going to suck. Tivo's are expensive because they are worth it. I'll be holding onto my SD DirectTivos for quite a while yet... Upgraded with networking and whatnot they are totally awesome. The only thing missing at the moment is a DirectTivo for the new DirectTV HD (mpeg4 based.)

    3. Re:Tivo is cheaper than you think by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 1

      I have 2 old S2 Directivos, and a SA S2 tivo, and my pride and joy, the overpriced S3 (I bought it before the HD Tivo was released). I use Fios now, but I kept the DTivo's as media players, they are all hacked to hell and gone and support the multiroom viewing, as does my S2, I am waiting on the S3 to support it as well, in Nov hopefully. I no longer have subscriptions active on the DTV's, but they function for their purpose, mediaservers.

      As to why, originally I was told hell no on the S3 due to its price, 5 min of using the fios DVR (with no fucking page up or down buttons...) my fiance got frustrated and almost murdered the remote.. and ordered me to purchase the S3 :)

      but this is slightly OT for this topic.. so back on topic, it would be great PR for Verizon (assuming they have FIOS in the area), to provide her free service for a year, and use her story for advertising to destroy comcast :) For the record, I am no verizon fan, in fact, on my list of companies that should die a horrible and painful death (no that is not a threat.. no physical death to personnel should occur, except maybe the CEO), the list goes, in this order, ATT, Comcast and Verizon

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    4. Re:Tivo is cheaper than you think by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to suck. I'm hoping now that consumers have another option in the form of the Tivo they might actually fix the software.

  53. Comcast Triple Play? Refused! Return to sender... by ben2umbc · · Score: 1

    I take my vengeance on Comcast by taking the Triple Play junk mail out of my mailbox, writing "Refused - Return to Sender" in sharpie and dropping it back in the nearby drop box. At a peak I was doing this about 3 times a week. It seems to have slowed recently. - A somewhat more satisfied with FIOS Tv and Net over Comcast user.

  54. Reminds me of a joke by guardiangod · · Score: 4, Funny
    here

    Dear Cretins,

    I have been an NTL customer since 9th July 2001, when I signed up for your 3-in-one deal for cable TV, cable modem, and telephone. During this three-month period I have encountered inadequacy of service which I had not previously considered possible, as well as ignorance and stupidity of monolithic proportions.

    Please allow me to provide specific details, so that you can either pursue your professional prerogative, and seek to rectify these difficulties -- or more likely (I suspect) so that you can have some entertaining reading material as you while away the working day smoking B&H and drinking vendor-coffee on the bog in your office:

    My initial installation was cancelled without warning, resulting in my spending an entire Saturday sitting on my fat arse waiting for your technician to arrive. When he did not arrive, I spent a further 57 minutes listening to your infuriating hold music, and the even more annoying Scottish robot woman telling me to look at your helpful website.... HOW? I alleviated the boredom by playing with my testicles for a few minutes - an activity at which you are no-doubt both familiar and highly adept.

    The rescheduled installation then took place some two weeks later, although the technician did forget to bring a number of vital tools - such as a drill-bit, and his cerebrum. Two weeks later, my cable modem had still not arrived. After 15 telephone calls over 4 weeks my modem arrived... six weeks after I had requested it, and begun to pay for it. I estimate your internet servers downtime is roughly 35%... hours between about 6pm-midnight, Mon-Fri, and most of the weekend.

    I am still waiting for my telephone connection. I have made 9 calls on my mobile to your no-help line, and have been unhelpfully transferred to a variety of disinterested individuals, who are it seems also highly skilled bollock jugglers. I have been informed that a telephone line is available (and someone will call me back); that I will be transferred to someone who knows whether or not a telephone line is available (and then been cut off); that I will be transferred to someone (and then been redirected to an answer machine informing me that your office is closed); that I will be transferred to someone and then been redirected to the irritating Scottish robot woman...and several other variations on this theme.

    Doubtless you are no-longer reading this letter, as you have at least a thousand other dissatisfied customers to ignore, and also another one of those crucially important testicle-moments to attend to. Frankly I don't care, it's far more satisfying as a customer to voice my frustrations in print than to shout them at your unending hold music. Forgive me, therefore, if I continue.

    I thought BT were shit, that they had attained the holy piss-pot of god-awful customer relations, that no one, anywhere, ever, could be more disinterested, less helpful or more obstructive to delivering service to their customers. That's why I chose NTL, and because, well, there isn't anyone else is there? How surprised I therefore was, when I discovered to my considerable dissatisfaction and disappointment what a useless shower of bastards you truly are. You are sputum-filled pieces of distended rectum -- incompetents of the highest order.

    British Telecom -- wankers though they are -- shine like brilliant beacons of success, in the filthy puss-filled mire of your seemingly limitless inadequacy. Suffice to say that I have now given up on my futile and foolhardy quest to receive any kind of service from you. I suggest that you cease any potential future attempts to extort payment from me for the services which you have so pointedly and catastrophically failed to deliver -- any such activity will be greeted initially with hilarity and disbelief -- quickly be replaced by derision, and even perhaps bemused rage.

    I enclose two small deposits, selected wi

    1. Re:Reminds me of a joke by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a real complaint letter?

      --
    2. Re:Reminds me of a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I'm a grammar Nazi, and I can't find *anything* wrong. It's just perfect use of the English language. Well done. 100%. Gold star. "Damn fine", indeed.

      Just that first line, "Dear Cretins" makes me LOL. So oxymoronic - so polite and so rude.

      Splendid.

    3. Re:Reminds me of a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not much of a grammar Nazi.

      ...from my cats litter tray...

      Where's the apostrophe? It should have been either "cat's" or "cats'".

    4. Re:Reminds me of a joke by Blackheim · · Score: 0

      Also reminds me of a BT call, linky http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj2oXMdZ4sk

    5. Re:Reminds me of a joke by vidarh · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's pretty telling that when Virgin Mobile merged with NTL-Telewest, they expected (and got) a massive increase in customer service calls, and had to staff up their call centers. Not because service got worse, but because people expect better of a Virgin branded company, and had previously just given and resigned themselves to not getting any service from either NTL or Telewest...

      Now, it's too early for me at least to tell if it's made a genuine difference - I haven't had to deal with support since the merger - but I do remember trying to order extra services from Telewest and giving up because they were so unhelpful. Way to throw away revenue.

    6. Re:Reminds me of a joke by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      This is why I'm wary of using a phone/net/TV combo service. If they screw up (or just decide to screw you) all three services get nailed at the same time. I don't want my phone service being held hostage to my cable tv.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    7. Re:Reminds me of a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, it's too early for me at least to tell if it's made a genuine difference

      It fucking well hasn't. You still get connected to a random Indian who knows nothing about what the last four random Indians promised would happen the last times. The call quality is worse than skype on a bad day.I would say it's like NTL, but face it, it is NTL.

      And to add insult to injury, Virgin now charge you at premium rate for the privelege of listening to empty promises about bandwidth.

      Shame on you, Virgin. To be avoided.

  55. She got the hammer back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how it would go for on ebay. Some enterprising slashdotter should get hold of it and add it to the EFF benefit auction.

  56. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by DeathElk · · Score: 1

    Good idea. Just, for the love of god, stay off their lawn.

  57. here is a similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I serve on student government at small liberal arts college. My position was recently added, and basically, I handle the concerns of students relating to information technology. For example, I've been working with the administration first by advocating for a wireless campus, then helping decide which areas would receive service.

    But the first thing I did on student government was try and tackle the "Comcast problem". The "problem" in question being massive downtime... over 120 calls due to downtime in one month. Keep in mind, this is a SMALL campus. The residence halls only had maybe a thousand students maximum. (And that is a liberal estimate).

    Now when my internet went down, I actually followed the Comcast tech into floor's wiring closet, and saw a bank of cable modems hooked up to a switch. He located my room's modem, and power cycled it. Problem solved. And it was something that a user should be able to due themselves, but Comcast insisted that the students not have access to the modems, because we might steal them.

    The thing is, the wait for a technician was two to three business days, if the technician even showed up.

    Slowly I garnered support for a new provider, starting with Residence Life, and eventually the head of IT for the college arranged a meeting with all the Comcast bigwigs... the main guy was in charge of sales for the entire state I believe. Anyways, the Comcast posse promptly blew off everything the college had to say. When I brought up students having technicians pull a no show, I was told that my peers were exaggerating or lying. It took me stating that I had experienced a no show before they would even concede the point. Everything was like that... they wanted the college to PROVE they were incompetent. They ignored what me and the head of IT said (That modem's should be moved to resident rooms, and that anyone whose modem was missing at year's end would be charged for it) and insisted that the problem was due to illegal file sharing. When they were told that connections were already throttled to a point where that was not an issue, they insisted the college's wiring was faulty and brownouts were causing the problem. Comcast offered to install UPSs in all wiring closets. (And got a little miffed when I said they should have already had them).

    Then they insisted it was a firmware issue with the modems and replaced every modem in the halls. Finally they admitted they needed to move modems into the rooms so users could power cycle on their own, and that was only after the college administration threatened to end the contract early and find a new ISP, and I threatened to write to Consumerist.

    End result? What could have been a fifteen minute "whoops, our bad, thanks for the suggestion" type meeting, it became a five month process, where every user complaint was dismissed unless not only a specific user would testify to it in writing, but any bad experiences with rude techs, or techs who never showed up were not owned up to unless the user had the foresight to have a witness wait for the tech with them. Even when the college pointed to the acceptable downtime limit in the contract, Comcast refused to turn over logs and insisted that the college either sue or accumulate documentation.

    And during the process, every word I said was met with derision or waved away since I was "only a student". It was made clear to me by Comcast that my opinion did not matter. And quit frankly, I think only the threat the college finding a new provider or possible lawsuits for breach of contract prompted them to act.

    1. Re:here is a similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He located my room's modem, and power cycled it. Problem solved.

      The worst thing is that's not even the problem being solved!

    2. Re:here is a similar story by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Out of curiosity, why couldn't the college ditch comcast and purchase bandwidth via a couple T3s and buy a couple switches? Was that ever an option? It seems really weird that a college would power their net with a Beowulf cluster of cable modems...

    3. Re:here is a similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I serve on student government at small liberal arts college...

      ... The residence halls only had maybe a thousand students maximum. (And that is a liberal estimate).

      Hmmm...

    4. Re:here is a similar story by KKlaus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whats the moral of the story though? You're still using Comcast!

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
    5. Re:here is a similar story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now when my internet went down, I actually followed the Comcast tech into floor's wiring closet, and saw a bank of cable modems hooked up to a switch. He located my room's modem, and power cycled it. Problem solved. And it was something that a user should be able to due themselves, but Comcast insisted that the students not have access to the modems, because we might steal them.

      Now there's your big problem. Why is the network set up that way with a bunch of cable modems on each floor? You need one (preferably two or three) big & fast internet connections to the outside world, then you route things internally with ethernet. You can do your own authentication & traffic shaping according to your own policy. If your provider gives you shit, you can easily replace them since the provider only delivers to one point.

      Internet connections are much cheaper in bulk, you tend to get better customer service with bigger connections, and you can easily get a service-level agreement with real penalties for the provider.

    6. Re:here is a similar story by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      Anyways, the Comcast posse promptly blew off... It took me.... Everything was like that... they wanted the college to PROVE they were incompetent. They ignored... and insisted that the problem was due to illegal file sharing.... they insisted the college's wiring was faulty... Then they insisted... Finally they admitted... after the college administration threatened to end the contract...
      When I brought up students having technicians pull a no show, I was told that my peers were exaggerating or lying.

      Where do Comcast business-types go to school to learn how to stonewall like this?
      This is mad skills! You think they'd put it on their resume? Does it contribute to their family life?

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    7. Re:here is a similar story by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      The root of the problem here seems to be your "head of IT", who apparently believes that a closet full of individual cable modems, one per user, is a fine way to provide Internet service to a few buildings of people on one campus.

    8. Re:here is a similar story by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, why couldn't the college ditch comcast and purchase bandwidth via a couple T3s and buy a couple switches?
      When you get a T3, you have to pay to have the cable laid out to you. Whereas that's not a problem in the city where you're likely near a major circuit, a small liberal arts college is likely to be out in the sticks. Chances are they couldn't afford the installation.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    9. Re:here is a similar story by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I think only the threat the college finding a new provider or possible lawsuits for breach of contract prompted them to act.

      Sometimes one has to speak in language that CEO types respect and understand (i.e. "we will take our business elsewhere" and "we will refer the matter to our legal counsel for a possible breach of contract tort"). The CEO understands the ramifications of lost business, especially to the telcos (who have their own problems, but have been providing professional grade network and communications services for a lot longer then the cable companies), and he understands and respects the language of lawyers, lawsuits, and contracts. Perhaps the college should have been quicker to issue their ultimatum to the Comcast instead of meeting with them to talk it over in endless meetings with lots of hand wringing, the CEOs take that as a sign of weakness to be exploited, not as a customer in need of assistance.

  58. As Ali G says...... by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    Help the muthafuckin' aged!!!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:As Ali G says...... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd rather guess he'd say RESPECT.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  59. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Neuticle · · Score: 2, Informative

    BAD MOD, No cookie! Referencing the parent and making a JOKE about the current state of affairs? Cut the guy some slack.

    Maybe English isn't the mod's first language, but even if you don't get the joke, it's hardly off-topic.

    Somebody woke up on the grumpy side of bed I guess.

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  60. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A woman who is 75 years old in 2007 was 9 years old when WWII started. It is safe to assume she didn't fight in WWII.

  61. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by ceoyoyo · · Score: 0, Troll

    He he. Thanks for the support. You know, they used to have some pretty interesting punishments for blasphemy. Maybe we could retask them for power crazed moderators. I should be nice though... today they gaveth more than they taketh.

  62. Mid-day entertainment: House of Blues Hair Attacks by Zapped.Info · · Score: 1

    I've worked the front lines of customer service and the repetition can become maddening, which is usually why you get a droll response, because you are the nth person to have said problem or service need.

    I suspect this was the most exciting/entertaining thing to happen at the office in a long while. I'd bet there was laughter and this probably egged her on...

    Speculating futher the scene was probably made more hilarious, given her age: The speed of the impromtu demolition was probably in slow motion and labored. I'd bet at times it may have looked like the equipment was locked in battle with her and that she was on the losing end of the fight! (laugh)

    Sure they had to call the police, but I'd bet there was a sigh of disappointment (back to work) when they arrived and subdued her...which makes me wonder...where was the Taser Secret Service? They should have been all over this.



    JOLTED1
    --
    It's important to know that I forgot what I thought I knew when I thought I knew it all:Now I don't even know whatIknow.
  63. "Tick, tick, tick, goes the clock." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sit, sit, sit, go Mona and Don." (from the article)

    More like, "Tick, tick, tick, goes Mona".

  64. Cathartic by threaded · · Score: 1

    It must be a cathartic feeling smashing the equipment of your nemesis.

  65. I see this coming... by PineGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mona "the Hammer" Shaw vs Steve "the Chair" Ballmer.

    Just imagine!

    1. Re:I see this coming... by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      The irony would be if it's broadcast live on Pay-Per-View exclusive to Comcast.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
  66. Carrie Nation by Raptoer · · Score: 1

    This lady reminds me of Carrie Nation, One of the champions of prohibition. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrie_Nation "Alone or accompanied by hymn-singing women, she would march into a bar and sing and pray, while smashing bar fixtures and stock with a hatchet. Between 1900 and 1910, she was arrested some 30 times for "hatchetations," as she came to call them. Nation paid her jail fines from lecture-tour fees and sales of souvenir hatchets." She was 65 at the time.

  67. Is it just me... by PrinceOfStorms · · Score: 1

    ...or is scaring the heck out of the office staff not really the best way to deal with her problems with the technicians and managers of the company? If this counts as "heroic", I can only assume a villain would have taken out a local school as well.

    1. Re:Is it just me... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, what language other than violence would you try on them? Legal action? Oh puleeeeze, what would you want to sue for? They know exactly how they can fuck with you without giving you reason for a case. Too late for the install? Ok, you pay 2 days less and be happy now (yes, you had to take off 3 days from work, lost your pay, but hey, wanna try to push that through a court? Good luck). Time shifting not working how you want it, or not at all, or "miraculously" not when it's most interesting? Tough luck. What do you want to sue for?

      I just wish more people had the chuzpah to grab their hammer and show a few companies what they think of their "service".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  68. Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative

    I like this quote from the Washington Post article: Her take on Comcast: "What a bunch of sub-moronic imbeciles."

    Another quote: "Manassas police spokesman Sgt. Tim Neumann says there have been other police calls to that Comcast office..." I would love to know why.

    Quote from the parent comment: "I called Comcast and started screaming. This got me somewhere as I finally got escalated to the CEO's office where they had a customer care executive assigned to me."

    You never get to the CEO's office, I'm guessing. They just say that to try to make you think they believe your complaint is important. In 2005, the Comcast CEO made $14.3 million, just for that one year. I know, I know what you are thinking: "I'm sad. He had a bad year!" But, don't worry, in 2006 he made $27.8 million.

    I think that it is safe to assume that someone who makes millions each year for doing a bad job has no concerns whatsoever about any troubles you have with his company. Any phony expression of concern is handled by people who barely make a living.

    In case you want to express your horror that he only makes tens of millions instead of hundreds of millions each year, contact the Comcast CEO directly: Brian Roberts.

    Why is being rich considered by rich people a license to be evil?

    1. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by TheLink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well he got paid nearly twice as much in 2006 from 2005, so either someone must like what he's doing and/or he's ripping off the company badly...

      --
    2. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by Drive42 · · Score: 0

      I'm just guessing, but I'm sure there are many other factors beside customer satisfaction that drive his salary. Just a guess, though.

      If it were possible, I'd be a professional devil's advocate.

    3. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Why is being rich considered by rich people a license to be evil?

      Most people, even evil ones, believe that what they are doing is right, or else they can rationalize their way to believing that it is justifiable and therefore right ("the ends justify the means" yada yada). This is true regardless of the amount of money involved, and conveniently means they don't have to listen to anybody with another opinion of their actions.

    4. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      He's not ripping off the company badly. The company is ripping off the customer badly. And in many places where comcast operates, they essentially have a monopoly.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    5. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that most CEOs, and for that matter most politicians, are borderline sociopaths. Wikipedia has a section on how to diagnose the condition, so let's see what they say:

      "The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV, currently DSM-IV-TR), a widely used manual for diagnosing mental and behavioral disorders, defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others occurring since age 15vc, as indicated by three (or more) of the following:

            1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest
            2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure
            3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead
            4. irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults
            5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others
            6. consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain steady work or honor financial obligations
            7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another

      Being rich doesn't make one evil, but being evil often puts one in a position to collect wealth (as in 2, 6 and 7 above).

    6. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by sammyo · · Score: 1

      >I know what you are thinking: "I'm sad. He had a bad year!"

      Remember that he is compensated for his *fiduciary* responsibility to the shareholders. Adjust
      that and the corporations will change quite quickly.

    7. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Being rich doesn't make one evil, but being evil often puts one in a position to collect wealth (as in 2, 6 and 7 above).

      I'd go further and say that number 3 applies to a lot of the current generation of business people. They don't give a damn about building something that's going to last. They only care about the next quarters results. What do they care if the company tanks? They will still be rich. And if we can only pump up the results for next quarter, maybe, just maybe, we can get bought out before anybody realizes how bad off we really are.....

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by TheTony · · Score: 1

      The "CEO office" is just an executive escalation group. It's by and large NOT the actual office of the chief executive.

      This is true of many companies.

    9. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Another quote: "Manassas police spokesman Sgt. Tim Neumann says there have been other police calls to that Comcast office..." I would love to know why.
      Unfortunately, it's probably very pedestrian stuff. For example, it's common for large companies to call the cops every time they fire an executive or a security officer. Comcast's offices are likely to be large, meaning they're a likely target for minor burglaries or vandalism. If there's any sexual harassment, if someone has a nervous breakdown, if there's a wild or asocial animal in an area without animal control, if someone's buried under a pile of doughnuts, there are actually tons of reasons to involve the police.

      If they made good stories, the sergeant would know what they were about. (Maybe he wouldn't tell us, but he'd know.) Therefore, it's likely that they're mostly boring.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    10. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "1. failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors as indicated by repeatedly performing acts that are grounds for arrest

      2. deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure

      3. impulsivity or failure to plan ahead

      4. irritability and aggressiveness, as indicated by repeated physical fights or assaults

      5. reckless disregard for safety of self or others

      6. consistent irresponsibility, as indicated by repeated failure to sustain steady work or honor financial obligations

      7. lack of remorse, as indicated by being indifferent to or rationalizing having hurt, mistreated, or stolen from another"

      Whew....I only got 3 out of 7....guess I'm still fairly good!!

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    11. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is being rich considered by rich people a license to be evil?

      Completely off topic, but perhaps anyone who would think that it is reasonable to have a salary that is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than the companies average is already evil.

    12. Re:Rich CEOs talk only to other millionaires. by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      You never get to the CEO's office, I'm guessing.


      With Comcast? I'm sure you don't. With WOW, it's not at all difficult to get in touch with the C*O's of the company. Their CIO is responding to customer inquiries all the time. A few weeks ago, a bunch of us who were watching the local HD channels without actually subscribing to the digital or HD packages noticed all of our HD channels gone. Someone sent an email to the CIO asking about it and promptly got a very detailed reply, explaining exactly what the problem was and how it happened (botched upgrade), what they were doing to resolve it, and promised that it would be resolved soon.
  69. Bugger, I was just going to post it by arivanov · · Score: 1

    Nowdays they have a worthy replacement. As anyone who has been unfortunate enough to buy Vodafone 3G Broadband can testify NTL can in some cases seem competent by comparison.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  70. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty safe to assume no women fought in WWII, since women weren't on the frontlines back then...

  71. For pity's sake, mods by patio11 · · Score: 1

    There is not a single American black male imprisoned in Gitmo. Never has been, either, never will be until somebody gets the bright idea to join the jihad and go off to Afghanistan to join the Taliban then get caught by the troops over there. They would then be taken out of Gitmo after their US citizenship is discovered. (It has happened before -- they had a one fairly well-off white kid, John Walker Lindh who styled himself "Sulayman al-Faris", from California who got bored, converted to Islam, and went off to meet Osama bin Laden. He plead guilty of providing material support to terrorists and was sentenced to twenty years. There was also an American/Saudi dual citizen Yaser Esam Hamdi, who was transfered to a US prison from where he mounted a Supreme Court appeal to not be held as an enemy combatant. He was let out in a deal with Saudi Arabia -- essentially, "He gives up his citizenship and you keep him away from any place where he can shoot at Americans, and we'll let him go".)

    You may now return to your regularly scheduled Republican bashing. Did you hear the one where they threw a four-year old girl in Gitmo because her mom was gay? True story, I read it on Slashdot.

  72. Welcome Back... by monkeyfromx · · Score: 1

    ... to Earth mamma Thor...

  73. Yes but.... by codeButcher · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....will Comcast blend?

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:Yes but.... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'm all for an empiric test. Only by experiment we can prove or disprove our theories, let's roll!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  74. Hammering Comcast by windowstuck · · Score: 1

    Go ol gal.......more of us who are stuck with every service in the world that we PAY for and get junk in return should stop being so nice to the "customer service" as they condescend to our requests for service. We are definitely getting "serviced" but not in a way that should be described in print!!

    --
    Waiting for wisdom from the other computer world...
  75. Damn it feels good to be a gangsta by OGC · · Score: 1

    Dear Hammer, I sincerely like to thank you Cuz now I got the world swingin from my nuts And damn it feels good to be a gangsta

  76. Best. Article. Ever. FTA: by mrjb · · Score: 1

    "Being a responsible newspaper, we must note that this is a misdemeanor, a crime, a completely inappropriate way of handling a business dispute. Noted. "

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  77. Hooray! She did the RIGHT thing! by johnsonlam · · Score: 1

    Not only in US, but the whole world's large commercial organizations (you can name a few easily) treat their customers like pigs/dogs/slaves, because they neither have franchise or monopoly. For a good citizen like us have no way to against them but just tolerate.

    She did a very good lesson to express our anger and show the hypocrisy of today's commercial organizations.

    --
    Hong Kong - International Joke Center (after 1997-06-30)
  78. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are probably a few French, German and Russian women who would beg to differ.

  79. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Futselaar · · Score: 1

    As a Dutchman, being given a dam by a company seemed quite appealing to me....

  80. That's nothing! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got Verizon DSL/Phone with no CATV, and Comcast STILL managed to screw me badly!

    A couple weeks ago, in the middle of the afternoon, my internet connection started crapping all sorts of madness. Disconnecting constantly, poor throughput... I thought maybe the line was really noisy or something, so I pick up the phone... No dial tone.

    It took a couple hours to piece together some of the information in my head. Hearing someone say something about cable while standing outside a new tenant's apartment across the hall, and later going to the top of the stairs and coming back down. (The box where all our phonelines come in is on the third floor, at the top of the stairs)

    With this information, I go up and check the box... It's closed. I take the screw out and open it, the clasp that holds everything down in one of the blocks pops open on its own... Closer inspection reveals a broken retaining tab. (Later found on the floor.) One cordless phone handset, and a little wiggling of wirey bits later, I am able to determine that this unmarked and now quite fscked connection is my line. So I taped the clasp down with some gaffer's tape, taped a little ball of tape to the back so the door puts pressure on it, marked the thing correctly, and wandered back to my apartment grumbling about how it shouldn't be illegal to light stupid people on fire.

    After talking to the new tenant, he confirmed that the Comcast technician said he had to make sure there was a phone line (wtf?!), and did in fact go play about in the box.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  81. Gotta love the older folks, they remember Taft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I say we arm our elderly and let them take back this country. They stood up in ww2, and they might be feeling up to it again."

    Considering the previous presidents they voted for. I don't think that would be a good idea.

  82. Slashdotters talk only to other slashdotters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why is being rich considered by rich people a license to be evil?"

    *shrug* Do you need to be rich to be evil?

    1. Re:Slashdotters talk only to other slashdotters. by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      No, but a lot of time it does seem that you need to be evil to be rich.

    2. Re:Slashdotters talk only to other slashdotters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, but a lot of time it does seem that you need to be evil to be rich.


      A widespread misconception. It is in fact possible to be rich without being evil. However, you do have to be either a spoiled brat or a flaming (though non-evil) asshole. And the first alternative is only available to those in line for an inheritance.

      (the converse isn't true, either.... you don't have to be rich to be a spoiled brat, a flaming asshole, or evil).
  83. T-shirt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm changing my T-Shirt slogan from "Don't tase me, bro!" to " C'mon, honey, we're going to Comcast! "

  84. Whats the tune? by denzacar · · Score: 0

    Tried "Can't touch this", didn't work.
    Tried "Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down)", didn't work either.

    Little help here...?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Whats the tune? by mtp85 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maxwell's Silver Hammer." The Beatles, Abbey Road.

  85. Gotta love the last two lines... by terrahertz · · Score: 1

    She does, however, finally, have phone service.

    On Verizon.
    ...if you listen real closely, you can hear the sounds of the Manassas, VA Verizon CO being abandoned right now... ("Women and Customer Service staff first!")
    --
    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  86. And you STILL use them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my opinion it's never worth threatening unless you're prepared to follow through. Give it a couple of months and you'll be played again..

  87. Get Free-To-Air Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get Free-To-Air Satellite with a motor and forget about paying subscriptions to either cable companies or Dish Network like companies... just pick up the free stuff, and you'll be good to go. If you speak more than one language you'll be even better off with fta! I got an fta receiver and sattellite dish about 2 years ago and love it. We get 2 Fox stations, a ton of RTN stations, Nasa, Russia Today, Al-Jazera, a couple of Cuban Movie Channels that play English Movies with Spanish Subtitles, Cubavision and Telerebelde, which are also Cuban channels, which have similar type English Movies with Spanish Subs playing that play at least once a night most nights, and several movies that play during the weekend nights... Plus we can watch a lot of NBC and ABC broadcasts, sometimes before they even hit the normal airwaves, so you can see newscasters behind the scenes before they actually do their reports... and tons and tons of wildfeeds of various sports and newscasts are all over the fta satellite skys... http://www.satelliteguys.us/ is the best place on the net to look for how to get this stuff set up... go check out their forums...

  88. You got it all wrong by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is being rich considered by rich people a license to be evil?


    First of all, let's qualify "evil". A lot of people (probably not you, but just to get it cleared anyway) have this "Black and White" idea that "evil" means being on a self-destructive quest to cause as much pain as possible, fuelled by pure hatred towards your fellow man. Unfortunately those don't really get ahead in the real world.

    RL "evil", especially of the corporate kind, is really just Sociopathy, a.k.a., Antisocial Personality Disorder. And indeed there seem to be a lot of them in management, and especially CEO positions.

    These are people who, simply put, don't give a flying fuck about their fellow man. You're an NPC to them. They don't hate you, they just don't care. They might harm you if it provides some momentary entertainment, and they think they can get away with it, but just as well they might pretend to be your friend if it helps them get an advantage that way.

    They also tend to be people who can (A) read others perfectly, and (B) fake any feeling convincingly. They can look hurt when they need to look hurt, shed a tear when that gets the emotional message across, or sell you logging rights in Sahara with the most sincere look on their face. They could tell you to do something that will ruin your life with a perfectly straight face, and be perfectly able to look themselves in the mirror the next day. Why not? You're just an NPC to them. You don't matter.

    Just as an example of lying with a straight face, a lot love to reinvent their past as something that milks the most sympathy. It helps manipulate people.

    And my take is that it isn't money that turns people into sociopaths, but the other way around: in the race up the corporate ladder, these guys have a natural advantage. And in the race between corporations, the one without principles or scruples will have the lower costs and get ahead.

    If being rich changed someone that way, then he probably was thinking that way long before. All that's changed now is that he feels powerful enough to drop (a part of) the mask and act like the asshole he always wanted to be.

    In a sense, we even expect them to. The idea that a corporation should have no other goals or responsibilities than making more money, at all cost, is, well, just saying that said corporation should act like a sociopath. Unfortunately, a corporation is nothing more than a bunch of people, and its decisions _are_ taken by people. So if we expect corporations to act that way, and put our money on those which act that way, we're pretty much asking them to be led by sociopaths. Or if they aren't, we'll sell their shares and move our money to the ones who can act properly antisocial.
    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:You got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately, this sort of behavior leads to incidents like Enron and Worldcom. If things get bad enough within a company, they will make a mistake and fall from their own hubris; think of it one of the checks and balances built into the system. Companies can still get away with murder, but it is much less murder than they would like to get away with. (And these days, with ever more regulatory eyes on business operations, they get away with even less.)

      It is one reason why many companies are starting to hire ethical managers instead of sociopaths. Unethical decisions, in the long run, are bad for business... so in the end, it is still about money, but at least we are headed in the right direction.

    2. Re:You got it all wrong by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      Dude... He's the diet coke of evil - just one calorie, not quite evil enough!

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    3. Re:You got it all wrong by wcrowe · · Score: 1

      RL "evil", especially of the corporate kind,.. It's not only found in the corporate world, but in politics too. Your description of sociopathic behavior fits many politicians perfectly. Especially the bit about reinventing their past to draw sympathy.

      --
      Proverbs 21:19
    4. Re:You got it all wrong by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Unethical decisions, in the long run, are bad for business... so in the end, it is still about money, but at least we are headed in the right direction.

      Too bad many leaders will get removed if they don't bring up profits for the next quarter.

      Also, many leaders will do something helpful in the short run albeit destructive in the long run, point to the obvious short term improvement while it lasts and jump ship to a new position elsewhere. When the old company goes down, they don't get the blame, but they keep the credit for the "good times" it had, and possibly even look good because the company failed after their "leadership" was withdrawn ("I was so good I kept it going in spite of the odds while I was there".) - most people don't realize a good leader would've made it so it could survive after they left.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    5. Re:You got it all wrong by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      You're an NPC to them. They don't hate you, they just don't care.

      You might say that if we were all of us involved in an episode of Star Trek: The Original Series as a shuttle landing party that the CEO's would be like Captain Kirk and their executive friends would be the rest of the bridge crew whereas the rest of us would be wearing red shirts and have names like "crewman number three", destined to be vaporized by the alien anomaly, killed by an errant phaser discharge, or caught in the explosion of the warp plasma accident merely to underscore the point that the alien planet is a dangerous place (dangerous to people like "crewman number three" that is, not the bridge crew of course since they all have to appear in next week's episode). Spock would raise his eyebrow and comment that the situation was "curious" while the bridge crew took cover and captain Kirk continues on without losing a second of sleep over the untimely death of "crewman number three" on Planet X.

  89. Addiction is a mother! by methuselah · · Score: 1

    its really kind of funny that so many folks act like television is a need. I got rabbit ears on my set. Sure there is a DVD player and a VCR but ridiculous amounts of money for more bad content slammed full of advertising? No,it is plain stupid. I do understand the need for a phone and internet connectivity, but there are choices for those. I read one post that indicated a 1800 dollar a year cable bill. How much content in the form of DVD's would that purchase? Paying for television is like paying for air. So maybe you deserve to be treated like an idiot for buying it. Microsoft does the same thing. So does the government for that matter. The only way to get satisfaction is to not participate otherwise you are their Bi**h.

  90. Re:Comcast Triple Play? Refused! Return to sender. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I'm glad you enjoyed yourself, but presorted junk mail is never "returned to sender." It is thrown away.

  91. In Soviet Russia by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    Operator hammers and sickles little old ladies!

  92. hammer granny by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    "The Washington Post reports that a little old lady took a hammer to Comcast. Apparently fed up with the lousy service she received from a botched Comcast installation of "triple-play", and a completely humiliating experience at a customer service center, 75-year-old Mona "The Hammer" Shaw took her claw hammer back to the customer service center and bludgeoned the office equipment into tiny plastic pieces." I think it might be more effective if she took that same claw hammer to the backs of executive skulls.

    hammer granny: So, you ready to fix things?

    executive: you're crazy!

    hammer granny: *whack!* Let's try this again. Fix things?

    executive: Stop it! Stop it!

    hammer granny: *whack!* You know what I want to hear. I can keep this up until your IQ matches your shoe size. Maybe I don't even want to stop. *whack!* Ooh, that sounded like you lost a couple of years of college there, maybe some fine motor control. Stop, hammer time. *whack!*
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  93. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind that back then people rented their phones from At&t, paid twenty cents a minute to call across the country, most domestic cars fell apart even faster, air travel was really really expensive.

  94. Remind anyone of "As Good As It Gets"... by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    ...where Helen Hunt has a very short, and not even very insightfull, rant against health insurance companies, and audiences started cheering and clapping? I heard a story about a health care executive who went to see the movie and witnessed the crowd cheering - only THEN did he realize there was widespread dissatisfaction with the way his company operated.

    If Comcast executives aren't having that same "Oh, Shit!" moment now, it's time to sell stock.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  95. Re:"I can't decide whether you shoud live or die.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why choose? Do both!

  96. You can get that package from Comcast for less... by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Comcast high-speed internet (without CableTV): $61
    Comcast mini-basic CableTV ($15) + high-speed internet: $60


    Until a few months ago, I was getting Comcast minimum TV + internet for a bit under $60 (Washington DC area).

    I called them up and told them I was considering switching to FIOS, which had just come through my neighborhood.

    They instantly reduced my internet charges to $30 (total bill now $45).

    Competition can be a wonderful thing - use it!

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  97. It makes me happy that I have Time Warner. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Time Warner Cable seems much better then Comcast. In terms of performance (10MB Internet standard) They at least come the day they are called Unfortunately it is we will be there between 12:00 - 4:00 and they will be there at 5:00 making you loose a half day of work for nothing. They don't charge directly for the equipment. It is mostly pain free service. Don't get me wrong there are things I dislike about it, I would much rather choose the channels I want then get a huge Club 900 channels where my family only watches about 10 of them, but with all the other competitors do the same thing. But compared to the rest Time Warner seems better. If you are unhappy with Comcast I would put a petition in with your local government saying we want comcast out. Just complaining and breaking Comcast keyboards and phones with a hammer wont do much. But if the community goes You suck we Want an other company then they will get it. Stop complaining and start acting.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  98. Drop it like its hot by riffzifnab · · Score: 1

    And you are still with them why? Drop their @(#$* like its an ebola death monkey (at least those are cute). They provide bad service, poor support, and your constituency still probably aren't happy. I can't belive you cant get a cheaper service all in one. Throw some traffic shaping on it so your P2P wankers don't flood everyone else and you should be good to go. I bet you'll save the college money.

    $30 monthly comcast fee * 1000 oppressed students = $30,000 a month for service. Start talking to real ISPs in the area.

  99. My Story by SCHecklerX · · Score: 4, Informative

    I might as well...

    I was a business class customer of a local cable company that comcast bought out. Back then, I was pretty much forced to pay extra for that service because they blocked all inbound smtp and http (which I provided on my servers). But, the commercial service was actually nice, and when I had a problem, they were very responsive and I had a direct line to L2 techs who knew what they were doing.

    Comcast then bought the company. I only found out when my bill arrived and it was now from comcast. They never told me I needed to change anything, and my service was still working and the bill amount was the same, so I didn't really care.

    One weekend, I lost connectivity. My own end seemed fine, as I was seeing the typical stream of ARP requests flying by on comcast's network. It looked to me like my default gateway was down. I called and explained the symptoms.

    The tech was confused and thought I should own a comcast router (I didn't...I run my own firewall with a regular linksys cablemodem). This would be a matter of contention for the next 2 months.

    Anyway, the problem persisted intermittently. To their credit, I did finally get through to a support rep who actually discovered the real problem: My modem was being intermittently filtered for some reason. He did explain that comcast was moving to using their own routers for all business class customers (same service, they just give you a static IP address in a 'good' netblock). I continued to use my old ISP config, and it worked, so I didn't care.

    Problem came back, but this time I knew the likely cause. This time the support lady was a total asshole demanding that I owned some form of comcast equipment, and that they would need to send a technician out (after explaining to her several times what was really going on) to remove that equipment and install their new solution. At this point, I was sick of paying extra for service I was not receiving so began the process of going back to residential service.

    Long story short, I had to sign some form to give comcast permission to cut my commercial service and go back to residential. They mailed this form to me in such a way that my server dropped it (their server was on the spamhaus block/exploit list!). I finally got the form and filled it out.

    2 days later, service is dead again. #$!@$#@!$. Again, they claim that I own some sort of comcast gear (b/c I was a commercial customer, and they have a certain way to do that...but I was transplanted from an ISP that they bought out...this is like the 20th time I've explained this to them). They will schedule a time to send a technician out. I agree, for now, and then call back to cancel the nonsense (hoping to speak to somebody with more clue)

    When I complain about this, I finally get the rep to concede that they don't need to send anybody out, and that they will transfer me to residential class service. They *FINALLY* understand that I don't have any of their equipment. I continue to use my old static IP address, which still works (go figure), because they have not given me any connection information yet to change (this is for a change that they were definitely going to force on me...and I have yet to hear any official news of this, other than when I call to report problems with my service).

    I did eventually get changed to residential service. Biggest hassle is that I have to smart relay through comcast's SMTP servers. Luckily they don't block inbound ports, so I can get away with paying less.

    Here's the fun part. Last week there was a router from comcast sitting on my porch. Inside was a letter about them changing my commercial service (which I no longer have due to the frustrations with my connection and horrible customer service). This thing showed up about a month after I started having problems, and AFTER I changed to residential service! These people obviously have a serious lack of internal communication that rivals even that with their customers!

    If they ha

    1. Re:My Story by jesboat · · Score: 1

      Sell the router.

      If it was sent via the postal service, at least, you're legally permitted to do whatever the hell you want with it :-) [1].

      (If it was sent via UPS/FedEx/DHL/etc., YMMV; IANAL.)

  100. You go grandma! by chiefbutz · · Score: 0

    You rock lady! You have the right idea. Comcast is full of a bunch of idiots. We use them because we have no choice in it. They sucks big! They stopped selling HBO to regular cable people to try and get them to go digital. Didn't work on my parents. They killed Game Show network, still didn't work. They suck. Plus their repairmen are IDIOTS! A lightning storm fried our cable modem. I got home from school and the cable guy had just arrived. My mom made me sit there and watch the guy. I has about 3 weeks into my semester long Comptia A+ Certification course and I could have told you the modem was fried! It isn't hard. When he left I went to my mom and was like "He was an idiot, I could have done all of that faster. All I needed was the modem" and she was like "I know, but this way we got a free modem"... she had a point...

  101. She had no choice by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    She had to use a hammer because her fists alone couldn't get through their thick skulls.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  102. Heh by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Dude, let's just look at what Fiduciary really means, before going down that line of reasoning.

    In a nutshell it just means that they'll do a honest job and not defraud the investors to enrich themselves. That's it. They have the respeonsibility to do a honest job... the same as everyone else.

    Every single employee in the company is held to the same expectation. (If less sometimes less formalized.) The lowly janitor too isn't supposed to let himself be bribed to install a few keyloggers and sell the company's secrets to the competition. The database admin too isn't supposed to export the production database and sell it to the competition. The accountant isn't supposed to invent new taxes payable to his own account, either. Etc. They're all, simply put, expected to do a honest job.

    Shouldn't they be paid millions per year too, then?

    Do you genuinely think that paying them tens of millions a year is the only way to keep upper management honest?

    1. That's such a bad opinion of them, that it stands out even on Slashdot. But more importantly,

    2. Repeatedly it didn't really work. Enron and WorldCom sure weren't kept honest by high management salaries, for example. Or I can remember at least one case where one guy gutted a company just for the hell of it, and actually cooked the books to make it look like his cost-saving measures were doing anything positive at all.

    3. Even more importantly, you can look at continental Europe or Japan, places with much more reasonable GINI indexes. Meaning that the difference between a director's wage and the janitor's wage is a helluva lot less than in the USA. If what you say was true, then both should see some massive corruption and have their economies ran into the ground as everyone who gets to the top starts defrauding the company to fill his own pockets. And somehow, while such cases occasionally do exist, they tend to be rather isolated, few and far in between.

    Contrary to somewhat popular misconception, there isn't some income limit at which people suddenly become honest because they already have all the money they might ever need. The guy with 2 million a year, wants 3 million a year. The guy with 20 million a year, wants 30. If you paid someone 2 billion a year, the only effect would be that he'd want 3 billion, so he can buy an aircraft carrier as his personal yacht.

    You can see that for as long as we have a recorded history. Whoever was an earl wanted to be a duke, whoever was a duke wanted to be a king, and whoever was a king wanted to be an emperor. It's just human nature, and it's how the human brain is wired.

    The brain sees differentials, not absolute happiness values, so there simply is no point where you'll say "ok, I have enough, I can stop now." And if you had an inclination to supplement your income by dishonesty when you had only $100,000 a year, you'll have the same inclination at $10,000,000 a year.

    Simply put, past maybe the poverty limit, more money doesn't make one more honest.

    All that's maybe changed is the sum that looks like an acceptable bribe, but no more. But even then, if the only thing that keeps a director honest is that the company is paying him more money than he could steal from it on his own, then that company just replaced an illegal drain with an even bigger drain that it called legal. It's a Baldrick-class cunning plan akin to giving each bank robber a million a month, 'cause it's more than they could find in any bank in cash to rob.

    So to cut this long rant short, I might even swallow the argument that such a big pay is needed because of their uber-l33t skills, and the rarity of such skills. Tell me that you need the 0.1% best managers and economists that ever walked the Earth, and I might even see how such a salary would be warranted to secure their services. (Though, then again, the top 0.1% physicists don't make tens of millions a year.) But that they need tens of millions in compensation for doing their job honestly? Heh. Gimme a break.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Heh by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Simply put, past maybe the poverty limit, more money doesn't make one more honest.

      Why cut off at the poverty line? There are plenty of poor, honest people, too. You don't need to excuse criminality just because someone is poor.

    2. Re:Heh by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Do you genuinely think that paying them tens of millions a year is the only way to keep upper management honest?
      The typical reasoning - and I know, this is a non sequitor from what you were responding to, but still - for paying upper management obscene sums of money is that it's simply cost effective. There are a handful of managers in the world who are measurably better than everyone else, and when one of those people steers your organization, your profits go up commensurately. Put one of those people at the helm of a company already making billions, and their presence will benefit the company to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. The top tier of any intellectual job is always fought over by companies. When that top tier individual is potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually, then you have to pay them tens of millions to keep them - because if you don't, someone else will.

      Now, I don't know for the CEO of Comcast, but there are many examples of such individuals having been a tremendously good business decision. There's a reason the behavior is so common in major companies. It's just good business.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:Heh by AirDave · · Score: 1

      Whoever was an earl wanted to be a duke, whoever was a duke wanted to be a king, and whoever was a king wanted to be an emperor. It's just human nature, and it's how the human brain is wired.

      Old man wanna be rich
      Rich man wanna be king
      And the king ain't satisfied til he rules everything


      Bruce said it so it must be true.

    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not about excusing dishonesty, it's that material poverty breeds crime. Condemn the reasons or not, but it's a fact.

  103. Bring 'em on by the Thousands by rueger · · Score: 1

    It's telling that Comcast refuses to even ackowledge how bad they screwed up, and in no way suggests that they could improve their service. I think the lesson to be learned is that one woman with a hammer can be ignored.

    What would happen though if a thousand, or tens of thousands of unhappy customers walked into Comcast offices across the country and hammered computers and phones into pieces? Would police really arrest a dozen people a day? Would Comcast continue to piss on customers and ignore complaints? Would regulators keep on pretending that there's nothing wrong?

    The whole goal of the 800 number, hours on hold, pass the buck, blame the customer routine is to ensure that a company never has to take responsibility for their actions. A voice on the phone can be ignored indefinitely, even cut off with no real repercussions. If customers stop accepting crappy phone service and instead start showing up at Comcast offices for every single problem, perhaps with a hammer or pitchfork in hand, I think that we would see a change. Real live people, especially armed people, cannot be ignored, cannot be hung up on.

    1. Re:Bring 'em on by the Thousands by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      What would happen though if a thousand, or tens of thousands of unhappy customers walked into Comcast offices across the country and hammered computers and phones into pieces? Would police really arrest a dozen people a day?
      If they were all illegally destroying things? Yes. And the person who organized them would be in serious hot water.

      The whole goal of the 800 number, hours on hold, pass the buck, blame the customer routine is to ensure that a company never has to take responsibility for their actions.
      And how would destroying tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars of office equipment, which would promptly be paid for by the insurance underwriter, change that?

      Real live people, especially armed people, cannot be ignored
      If you'll RTFA, the whole reason she showed up with a hammer is that the first time she showed up as a real live person, she was ignored. And, what do you know, nothing's really changed. Real live people with weapons in fact can be ignored, and generally will be, unless it comes to injuring office workers (which, in a flood of thousands of angry customers with weapons, isn't tremendously unlikely.) And when it comes to injuring office workers, all you're doing is telling Comcast to hire more security and pass the cost on to you.

      Violence doesn't solve anything.
      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  104. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "when companies gave a dam... when people gave a dam doing their jobs..."

    They gave out all their dams on the Colorado and Tennessee rivers, as I recall.

    "They stood up in ww2,"

    Yeah, they "stood up" with the helpful encouragement of the little man from the draft board.

  105. Unfortunately, the playing field is not level by raddan · · Score: 1

    There is such an abundance of crappy customer service out there you would think that any company that provides outstanding (or even reasonable) customer service could steal the market. I'm not trying to sell these services or anything, but there are alternatives (for some people), and their customer service is outstanding. I have lots of personal experience with both Speakeasy and Cogent. In both cases, they contact me when there's a problem. Both services give me "heads up" notifications when service on their end might affect me, and they rarely make you wait on the telephone. The only time I've ever waited was while a Speakeasy customer service person put me on hold while he put together a conference call between Covad and Verizon techs (I was trying to have a local loop installed, but Verizon kept botching the thing up).

    There is a downside: both are expensive. Not so much for Cogent (well, I'm not paying for that one anyway, work is), but Speakeasy definitely comes at a premium. For the price of my one Speakeasy connection, I could buy one of these "triple-play" packages from one of their competitors. And if my cell service weren't also paid for by my work (I always have to be reachable for work), I would consider it. But in the end, I don't think I would-- it's just not worth it. The last time I lost service, on Christmas eve, I called Speakeasy, and sure enough, someone was there and responded. They tracked it back to the DSLAM (Verizon's DSLAM), and we ended up concluding that getting it fixed was a lost cause until the holiday was over. Sure enough, two days after Christmas, my service was back-- probably whenever the Verizon tech responsible got off his fat arse.

    But anyway-- we all know why the "good guys" can't compete. It's because the big telcos have politicians deeply within their pockets. How is Speakeasy going to be cheaper when they have to lease their lines from Verizon for more than Verizon itself charges for the same service? This is why we shelled out billions to the telcos in the 1990's-- they're common carriers. We didn't give them that money to expand their private networks. We gave it to them to expand the national infrastructure. As far as I'm concerned, they're reneging on their contractual obligations to us. And I will not give them a penny if I can help it.
  106. Fantastic! Way to go Mona! by rabblerouzer · · Score: 1

    I personally hate Comcast and, though I am one of its 25 million subscribers, I am certainly not satisfied. When I moved two months ago, I told customer service that I wanted to keep my service as it was at my condo (while I slowly moved my stuff) and wanted to set up new service at my new home. Fine they said. A week later the moron tech showed up (late of course) and managed to not bring either a cable box or the equipment for my Internet connection. He claimed it wasn't on his sheet at the warehouse--give me a break. After much hemming and hawing he said he'd be back--this time he came back with half the equipment and a promise to finish later in the day. When all was said and done, he managed to cut off my internet service at my condo and messed up both the internet and cable at my home so nothing worked. Three days later (and countless hours on the phone to customer service) another tech came out and fixed it all. Way to go Comcast!

  107. Attila by skinfaxi · · Score: 1

    "Attila at The Gates of The Telephone Company"
    They said that
    my telephone
    would be fixed
    by 6.
    They guaranteed
    it.
    - Richard Brautigan
    From "Loading Mercury with a Pitchfork" 1976
  108. Good basis for a SciFi story by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    I also don't have "TV" -- though I have a television and DVD player, I don't have cable, dish or OTA television programming. My wife and I watch about one movie a week. The average USian watches around 5 hours of TV a day, which is hard for me to fathom. Aside from escapism, television has almost nothing positive to offer. Those 5 hours I don't spend with the boob tube is time that I use to talk with my wife, play with my daughter, read, and enjoy various hobbies.

    Your point about walking past the apartments is familiar. Sometimes I go for walks at night, and it is eerie to see all the houses with the "blue glow" coming out the front windows. It's also interesting to look at how most homes have the furniture organized--you'll notice that all the furniture in rooms containing a television is oriented toward the TV. You don't see two chairs facing each other so people can sit and talk, you see two chairs facing the television.

    Anyway, on to my point: I've often thought that you could make a cool SciFi story about an analog to television, where each evening all the citizens return to their homes and are "programmed" for the next day. But maybe that's a little too close to reality for it to make a comfortable story premise.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Good basis for a SciFi story by putzin · · Score: 1

      This would be good for the Sci-Fi channel maybe. As a correlary, I turned off Tivo a while back, wasn't using it. I had gotten to a point where I was paying for basic cable because I felt better having it, but I realized I wasn't recording anything, and actually didn't turn the TV on very much. I'm not anti TV, but don't need to spend that much time in front of it. When I called Tivo to tell them, the very pleasant woman was surprised. She kept asking why I stopped recording and whether I just needed some new services to keep me interested. I didn't have a better answer than over the last few years, TV has pretty well sucked raw eggs, so there isn't much to watch. I've since picked up my viewing habits a bit, mostly for sports, although I do watch a few shows regularly. To be honest, TV still sucks raw eggs. I just live by myself now and find there is more alone time than I can deal with. Sounds sad, it's not really, but sounds sad.

      --
      Bah
  109. HUMILIATION! by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    DENIED!

  110. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Guppy06 · · Score: 1
    "It's pretty safe to assume no women fought in WWII, since women weren't on the frontlines back then..."

    Because...
    1. If it's not on the front line, it doesn't count
    2. Nobody was ever put into a combat situation away from the front lines (wars are nice and orderly like that)
  111. Re:Tiger...and Comcast's (false) advertising claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...and Comcast's (false) advertising claims:
    "your calls won't change; they'll only cost less".

    Well, um, no, my calls cost more now, that I've switched from (phased-out) Comcast Digital Phone, to (intermittently working) Comcast Digital Voice, to (reliable old analog, but still overpriced) AT&T phone service. After losing tons of my valuable time to switch twice (at Comcast's urging--none of this was my idea; Comcast "threatened" to discontinue my (reliable, relatively-inexpensive, but technology old-fashioned) Comcast Digital Phone, so I had to "act now"). And I'm still resolving billing issues with multiple vendors.

    And, no, my calls *did* change, for a while (until I gave up). During four weeks of (really poor) customer service phone calls (dozens of people, so many hours on hold, listening to many falsehoods or displays of ignorance), a half dozen technician visits (some good, some bad), replacement of every wire and piece of Comcast equipment in my house (and bogus double, triple, incorrect, ultimately backed-out billing for all sorts of things instead of their advertised "Free Professional Installation" which consisted of backfeeding the phone signal from a new cable modem to my existing phone jacks, i.e. plugging in one wire=$60!?!), they could *not* get Comcast Digital Voice phones to work reliably at my house: No dial tone and/or noisy, one-way, or dropped calls several times a day (every day for four weeks). And now, I somehow pay more per month, because they "improved" my TV packaging with "free" premium channels, that I've canceled, but somehow I cannot go back to my previous plan.

    During the outages, I pointed out that the phone service broke whenever the internet access also broke (pinging an IP address would time-out whenever the phone was dead--I was initially told that this is "impossible" even though the phone is plugged into the cable modem, somehow the phone should always work, even if the cable modem was disconnected? WTF?). I coded a little program to ping a (reliable server) IP address once every minute and log successes and any timeouts; the logs show multi-minute time-outs 10 to 20 times a day, every day (and still does--we just live with it, waiting for a competent internet provider to come along (and we're willing to pay more for reliable internet service).

    The Comcast technicians (off the record) blame the decade(s) old wiring under the street (that Comcast has no intention of repairing or replacing). So now I pay more for (reliable, non-Comcast) AT&T analog phone service. Oh, and I signed up with AT&T for a free installation of DishNet Satellite HD-TV/DVR, which looks better than Comcast's, so buh-bye to Comcast's HD HDVR. (I do have to point out that the AT&T and DishNet customer service also sucks, though perhaps less than Comcast's. I'm already thinking of trying DirectTV instead for better baseball coverage than DishNet. I guess I'm an optimist to keep expecting some technology to deliver on its promises.)

    I can only hope that either AT&T runs fiber optic cable to the houses in my neighborhood, or moves the "central office" closer to enable DSL, or that Google somehow provides wireless broadband (but I'm in a valley, with really poor cell phone reception). I am so looking forward to dropping Comcast internet (my only viable choice right now; I'm too remote for DSL or Wireless; I telecommute daily and really need internet access to work from home, and I cannot use Satellite because it doesn't work with VPN).

    Wouldn't it be great if every home had coax, fiber, and wireless access to a menu of internet, voice, and TV options, where competition drove prices down and drove customer service (the only differentiator) up? How many years away is this?

  112. Brave New World by Tony · · Score: 1

    Anyway, on to my point: I've often thought that you could make a cool SciFi story about an analog to television, where each evening all the citizens return to their homes and are "programmed" for the next day.

    Too late. Brave New World had "soma," which was a drug, but essentially was an analogy for television.

    Lots of good SF has television-like analogs.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  113. oops by ozric99 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "sometimes I can wait 4 or 5 seconds before hitting the 'tivo' button until the menu comes up"

    should be: "sometimes I can wait 4 or 5 seconds after hitting the 'tivo' button until the menu comes up"

  114. Didn't look like an excuse to me by Tony · · Score: 1

    It didn't look like he was excusing it-- it looked like he was explaining it. Statistically, most crimes are committed by people living at or below the poverty line. Are they poor because they are criminals? Or are they criminals because they are poor?

    At a subsistence level, living below the poverty line makes one a bit more desperate. That's all he was saying, near as I can read it.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Didn't look like an excuse to me by sammyo · · Score: 1

      Exactly, thanks Tony.

      Choices were made, oh in the 80's (not sure of the time frame), that changed the
      rules that corporations 'judged success'. Prior to that investors made money off
      dividends and long term growth was the measure of success. Leveraged buyouts and
      huge IPO's just did not occur. Then the economists figgured how to game the system...

      Most corporate execs are honest hardworking folk that follow the rules. But
      the RULES are skewed.

      Thus, I have no issue with Moraelin's observation of disparieties, I certainly
      am often appalled. I read Ben and Jerrys tried to enforce a max 1:7 ratio between
      salaries, they are maybe the ultimate idealistic corporation, but they could not
      find a CEO at that price. I don't get it. It's not right, but it's the way the
      rules work these days.

    2. Re:Didn't look like an excuse to me by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I read Ben and Jerrys tried to enforce a max 1:7 ratio between salaries, they are maybe the ultimate idealistic corporation, but they could not find a CEO at that price. "

      Are they still taking applications for said position? I'm SURE I'd be willing to take the salary they are offering.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  115. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by superyooser · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they "stood up" with the helpful encouragement of the little man from the draft board.

    How old are you? Do yourself a favor and read a book or something.

    Please step into this time machine and listen to the sounds of the WW2 era. You will learn a lot about America, the country you and I (young people) never knew.

  116. Definition of "evil" by Tony · · Score: 1

    "Evil" is the willingness to fuck over someone else for your own benefit. That's it. That's all.

    Excellent analysis of the paradox of the corporation. Question is, how do we fix it?

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
  117. It all started with the toilet paper... by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    When businesses started trying to pinch pennies by buying the cheapest toilet paper they could find, I knew the economics of corporate life were changing for the worse.

    The problem is, businesses don't try anymore. Innovation has taken a back seat to profit protectionism, and the people that are suffering the most for this lack of vision, lack of ability, or flat out apathy are the customers.

    Quality customer service? "Sorry, that means we have to actually deal with customers. That's never fun - they actually criticise us! The nerve of these people!"

    Executive salaries draining the coffers? "No sweat. We go cheap on customer toilet paper and crow about increasing shareholder value. But, uhm, be sure to let the shareholders use the executive washrooms, OK?"

    Don't really have a business model? "We don't really do those anymore. It's easier to just buy someone else. If they don't have one, there's always another company out there that might."

    Infrastructure maintenance/improvements? "What are you, nuts?!? We'd have to dip into profit! I've got a golf tournament next week, asshole. Do you expect me to take the bus?!?"

    Customer realtions? "That's funny! Seriously . . . Funny . . . What do we care about customers? I've got elected officials. Once he signs off on my monopoly, who gives a shit about customers? They buy what I sell whether they like it or not. It's not like they have a choice. Besides, even if they do try and leave, I'll just get my official to mandate ownership, just like the insurance companies did."

    "Then, my son . . . then we can begin suing the customers . . . "

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    1. Re:It all started with the toilet paper... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, we're partly guilty of this happening ourselves. What do we want? Quality? Bullshit. When was the last time you heard in an ad that "Our service is the best"?

      No. What do you hear? "Our prices are INSAAAAAAANE!" We want cheap. Period. We want to get crap dirt cheap. That's the problem.

      People only see the price of something, notice it's cheaper by a few cents than the stuff from the guy next door and they already think they made a great deal because "hey, I got it cheaper!". What people forget is what John Ruskin already knew: "It is unwise to pay too much, but it is also unwise to pay too little. When you pay too much, you lose a little money, that is all. When you pay too little, you sometimes lose everything because the thing you bought is incapable of doing the thing you bought it to do. The common law of business balance prohibits paying a little and getting a lot... It can't be done. If you deal with the lowest bidder it is well to add something for the risk you run. And if you do that you will have enough to pay for something better."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  118. Go UU! by mestlick · · Score: 1
    If you RTFA all the way through, you'll see that she's a Unitarian Universalist.
    I too am a UU and a Comcast subscriber, and I'm quite proud to be associated with her in this way.
    Many might not realize that three of our seven UU principles explicitly promote this type of behavior.

    From http://uua.org/visitors/6798.shtml:

    • Principle 2: Justice by hammer, equity and compassion in human relations
    • Principle 5: The right of conscience and the use of the hammer within our congregations and in society at large
    • Principle 6: The goal of world community with peace, liberty, and hammer based justice for all
  119. Deliberate misquote by einhverfr · · Score: 1

    They say to the (wo)man with the hammer, "Everything looks like a nail!"

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  120. Try to become a customer by LeeMeador · · Score: 1

    I had a recent encounter with Comcast. I went to visit my mother, who by the way, has hammers in her garage. She was talking about getting a computer to send email and such. So I called Comcast to check on the price of the Internet connection.

    The guy is very friendly and tells me the cost and such.

    So I ask, "What is the speed?"

    "Six megabits", he says.

    I respond, "Is that up and down?" but I knew there was no way.

    "384K up and 572K down" he said confidently.

    "That doesn't come out to six megabits", I replied.

    The next sound I heard was a short click and the recorded message said, "Your expected wait is 30 minutes."

    I don't know if someone had told him to do that when he got some techie troublemaker but it sure looked good on the log that he could answer my questions so fast.

    (I hung up and called back. The female voice seemed more informed.)

    One bit of additional info: I had just tried to call Qwest and got a recording saying they were closed on Saturday.

    The troubling thing to me is that both of the main residential Internet providers had serious issues with a potential customer. The old joke points out the difference between prospects and customers. Neither one treated a prospect reasonably. What does that say about the way they treat customers.

  121. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not a big fan of Elderlies. The last half of their life was great, payed by a national debt we will be paying for generations.
    But reading this:
    I say we arm our elderly and let them take back this country.

    OK, that might be worth the price of the debt. Get America back from inept corporations and cretins politicians! Wow, what a dream. Let's do it!

  122. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "Please step into this time machine and listen to the sounds of the WW2 era."

    Oh, yes! Everything I need to know about the period I can glean from the mass media of the time, rubber-stamped by the Office of War Information! Everybody was in favor of fighting in Europe, even though we'd been attacked in the Pacific! And volunteers for the war swelled the ranks of the US military so much, they never had to lower the draft age to 17!

    "You will learn a lot about America, the country you and I (young people) never knew."

    My grandparents never knew it, either. What you're being spoonfed here is a whitewashed, sterilized version of reality specially prepared for and by the mass media of the time. "Everybody" was happy and cheerful and good little citizens because they wanted you to happily march off to fight Europe's war as well. And as the Supreme Court had ruled for their parents, speaking out against the draft was punishable by imprisonment. So, yeah, everybody was happy with the war and all too willing to serve, especially that 75% of the military that were draftees.

  123. CristalShandaLear by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1

    From the article: Being a bunch of fucking pussies who are to scared to even remotely appear that we condone her behavior, lest we lose our spot at the next White House Correspondence dinner, we must note that Comcast pressed charges against her anyway completely their trifecta fuck over of their lost customer. Big Business and Law Enforcement are never wrong and must always prevail. Heil Cheney.

  124. Bowser? by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    She may just be Kuppa's mother;)

  125. Re:Tiger...and Comcast's (false) advertising claim by rosaliepizza · · Score: 1

    I had a similar problem with my ISP where my connection was constantly dropping. After about four weeks of daily complaining to CS they sent a technician out and in 20 minutes time he found I had a IP conflict with another address. They issued new IP address and have not had problem since

  126. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You crazy kids, get the shattered corpse of your friend off my lawn!"

  127. Heh by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    I got a call from the Comcast guy a while back. It was a recorded message but it didn't have a 'if you'd like to be removed from our list, press two' so I pressed one and got a live human.

    "Hello, my name is *mumble*, and I'd like to..."

    "Hi, please take me off your list."

    "But we've got such a great deal! It's just-"

    "No. Please take me off your list. I don't even own a television set."

    "...well, sir, you don't have to *lie*..."

    Click... bzzz. Didn't take me off the list, either.

    Takes balls, accusing your potential customer of lying to you and then ensuring that he'll get more calls from your company.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  128. If I recall correctly... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    Ben & Jerry's did manage that (the 1:7 ratio) until they were bought out by Unilever.

    Not sure how good they were at sticking to the other socially responsible business positions, but from what I understand, even in the segment of the company that is strictly Ben & Jerry's, the 1:7 ratio is no more.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  129. Name that cable company so that we can avoid by unity100 · · Score: 1

    the idiots. customer is always right.

  130. She's not a hero by alc6379 · · Score: 1
    (before I go further, let me state I'm not trying to troll... I just have a dissenting opinion from most)

    What good does this do? Couldn't she have gone to the media, or some other alternative?

    I can sympathize with her frustration, but doing something like this is about as effective as yelling at a lowly phone rep over an issue that isn't resolved in the call center. What did she think they were going to do? Not call the police?

    The installation tech that came out did a bad job. Fine-- they should have sent someone out to fix her phones. She shouldn't have been ignored. I'm not stating that she has no right to be irritated. Why did she sit on a bench for two hours, rather than be persistent? (She said she was out there this long on an NPR interview).

    The best way to get results from organizations like this is to REALLY be annoying, but don't cross the line of property destruction or vulgarity. Sure, it's satisfying to do something like this in the short term, but now this old lady has a criminal record, and she ultimately didn't get Comcast to fix her issue. Personally, I hope that she has to pay recompense for breaking the stuff, just like Comcast should be responsible for paying to fix her stuff. What did she really accomplish?

    --
    I don't moderate anymore. Karma penalty for 90% fair mods? Can I mod that unfair?
  131. There's a lot of leeway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  132. Brain chemistry by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I see you've taken the time you would have spent watching tv and invested it into becoming completely batshit fucking insane.

    Ha ha. Your ignorance makes your joke seem funny to you. Good one.

    This is hardly contested science. --As in, nobody contests it. You want to know more about it? Study advertising, psychology and TV's effect on brain chemistry. Just because you didn't see it on the Discovery Channel doesn't mean that it isn't real.

    Do you know why women shave their legs? You probably don't, so I'll tell you. Women shave their legs because razor blade companies realized that they were only selling product to half the population, only to men. So they set about trying to convince the population through advertising that body hair on women was somehow dirty and undesirable. They did a very effective job, so now women feel ashamed to have body hair. That's why women shave their legs.

    Advertising IS thought control, and it is the simplest kind, driven by greed as opposed to fear. There are other kinds. --One of which is designed to make chumps like you ridicule anybody who points out the man behind the curtain. You need to start learning how this stuff works, or you will find yourself existing in a perpetual state of stupid.

    But hey, as long as you're stupid, your jokes will still seem funny to you. Bonus! Who needs reality?


    -FL

    1. Re:Brain chemistry by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      I didn't call you insane because you were talking about the power of advertising, but because you were talking about people having "direct access to the subconscious" where they can program you with "sinister messages."

      It's interesting that the one example of control through advertising you cited occurred several decades before TV became commonplace. It's also interesting to read about cultural rituals involving head and body hair throughout recorded history, as there's stranger body modification practices than shaving legs, most of which existed before advertising or TV, or didn't depend on it.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:Brain chemistry by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      I didn't call you insane because you were talking about the power of advertising, but because you were talking about people having "direct access to the subconscious" where they can program you with "sinister messages."

      It sounds to me like your definition of 'insane' is somebody who describes advertising as 'sinister'. Sorry. Perhaps I should have said something bland like, "Manipulative with reckless disregard for health and welfare." If it smells like a rose and looks like a rose. . . And I can cite a lot more than one example, so please don't insinuate that I am somehow having to search within a shallow pool when you know so little about me.

      It's interesting that the one example of control through advertising you cited occurred several decades before TV became commonplace. It's also interesting to read about cultural rituals involving head and body hair throughout recorded history, as there's stranger body modification practices than shaving legs, most of which existed before advertising or TV, or didn't depend on it.

      No. Your points are only 'interesting' in that you seem to believe such half-baked reasoning validates your rudeness. The fact that advertising works was the point. Further, TV, which most certainly does put the brain into a highly receptive alpha state is not a matter of conjecture. It's proven fact which, combined with advertising and every other message sent at you by TV, makes humans highly susceptible to psychological manipulation. There's a reason billions of dollars are spent on television advertising and propaganda; it works extremely well. Read your Chomsky.

      As for hair and body altering rituals. Yes, those behaviors are part of human nature. I am hardly contesting that. The point is that those behavior patterns can be switched on or off at will by powers which have no interest in public welfare. --Consider all the other human rituals and behavior patterns which TV has played a key role recently in activating and/or suppressing.


      -FL

  133. unplugged by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    Interesting that your most poignant memory with regard to TV, in opposition to it, elicited scenes actually drawn from a television program. You will be assimilated... er it seems you already have been.

    Just because I've unplugged doesn't mean I don't still need to be able to communicate with the rest of the world. Or are you suggesting that I not use words or concepts if they could not be derived from my current way of living? Do you actually believe you've invalidated the point and that TV is healthy for you?


    -FL

  134. How did she get them to install? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been waiting on Comcast since March to finish an install. I live a block from Microsoft's and Eddie Bauer's new office in Bellevue, WA, and Comcast still isn't competent enough to get cable working in the area. I took seven days off of work so far to wait on them. My entire vacation time for the year was wasted by Comcast. I really wanted to watch football, so while I'm willing to sacrifice a few day's of time to get cable, seven days and counting is just too much. David Kerr, the Franchise Manager in the city's IT Department, has been very helpful, but even he couldn't get Comcast to spend the time and money to find employees competent enough to crimp coax connectors.

    Of course even though I don't have service, Comcast is still billing me. If I had to guess who the next Enron was going to be, I would guess Comcast. They have a tremendous about of fake billing.

  135. The internet is not TV by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    But then again, you're sitting here reading and posting on Slashdot. What was your argument again?

    The internet is not television. The internet is a two-way communication technology which allows people like us to share and build and examine ideas as we are doing right now. People engaged in this manner on the internet exhibit heightened activity in numerous parts of the brain. --The more work you put into reading and thinking and using your brain in a dynamic way, the more you get back. TV, on the other hand, is a one-way medium and people's brain activity drops off within the first few seconds of viewing to levels similar to those in coma victims. --The fluorescing light from a TV screen is largely responsible for this effect.


    -FL

  136. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, now this is ridiculous. (Ab)Use of the "troll" mod here? What, does some enemy of yours have mod points today?

    If they want to mod stuff Troll, we can give them REAL troll posts to mod.

    /que Tubgirl and Goatse guy

  137. I feel the same way. by eatont9999 · · Score: 1

    I hear what the old lady is talking about. I have had the worst experience with these morons. They are very cocky and think they are internet gods. They must hire Nazis on a strict basis. I am thinking about doing what the old lady did, except I will use a large caliber and clean the place out!!! Maybe then they will wake up and start acting like a common carrier.

  138. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

    Just make sure to check their portfolio. If "New Orleans" appears on it, it might not be such a deal.

    Oops. I'll stop and be good now.

  139. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newman!

    Poor Goatse Man went to the big webpage in the sky. Does the wayback machine cache images?

  140. Re:Gotta love the older folks, they remember Ameri by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    god you really know how to kill a joke :) Come on, lets just roll with it.. please ;)

  141. goes to show ya by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    to think I stuck with comcast tv/internet when i moved despite the dish tv antenna already on the house, because i figured that cable had to be more reliable than a satellite connection. i'm still intermittent, despite having had the drop cable from the pole to the house replaced; i assume that more of the neighborhood cable needs replacement. Then it struck me; when your major real asset is the network of installed cable, and an unknown amount of it is either too old or too decrepit or both to handle the bandwidth you're peddling now; i'd be whistling past the graveyard too. while i'm at it, who designed the interface for comcast tv? nuff said. and their DVR; functions as well as if it were running windows. nuff said. but the customer service is what's great. friend of mine moved, got comcast internet/tv/phone. so far so good. hey, why not push your luck, get them to install a wireless network. haha. worked well enough for the tech to leave; that was it, though. followed literally hours and hours of being transferred between tech support for the network; the internet gateway; they even transferred to Macafee support. and round and round and round. Finally, four days later, another tech came out and plugged the network adapter into the USB port in back of the machine (Dell, BTW) instead of the front. bingo. any of you in the same boat, there's hours of phone service time saved. So I'm just mulling it over; is it less trouble to have comcast come out to take another whack at my system, or just go to dish and forget it?

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.