Slashdot Mirror


Smart Immigrants Going Home

olddotter writes "A 24-page paper on a reverse brain drain from the US back to home countries (PDF) is getting news coverage. Quoting: 'Our new paper, "America's Loss Is the World's Gain," finds that the vast majority of these returnees were relatively young. The average age was 30 for Indian returnees, and 33 for Chinese. They were highly educated, with degrees in management, technology, or science. Fifty-one percent of the Chinese held master's degrees and 41% had PhDs. Sixty-six percent of the Indians held a master's and 12.1% had PhDs. They were at very top of the educational distribution for these highly educated immigrant groups — precisely the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the US economy and to business and job growth." Adding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country.

770 comments

  1. Can you blame them? by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The American dream used to be a house in the country. Now it's a house in another country.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Can you blame them? by thesolo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The American dream used to be a house in the country. Now it's citizenship in another country.

      Fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Can you blame them? by Adilor · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No blame whatsoever. The US seems to be a sinking ship as of late; why not abandon it and head to solid ground? I'd likely do the same if I were in their position. I don't blame them one bit. It's like Zelos from ToP said. "I side with the strongest." In terms of one's own self-preservation, it's a very smart move.

      It begs a question, though. Will there be some time down the road when, should our economy rebound and achieve the levels that those people once sought again? And, if so, would we see a sort of inverse-mass-exodus? Only time will tell, I suppose.

    3. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pessimistic about a resurgent economy that puts America on the same path it was in mid 90's in terms of leading the world in new markets. The infrastructure is crumbling. Healthcare, subpar primary education, lack of access to cheap capital.. these things are going to take a front seat in the next decade in order to build a platform for the next generation. I view 2010-2025 period as damage control.

    4. Re:Can you blame them? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1, Informative

      Eh, no. Now it's money.

    5. Re:Can you blame them? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, my dream is always that the zombies are about to catch me, when I realize I'm naked and then start falling. Then I wake up.

    6. Re:Can you blame them? by Fallingcow · · Score: 5, Informative

      No joke. If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland. As it is, I'm hoping things get better, because if they don't then staying here will have been a huge mistake. Certainly staying here means not having kids, unless we get our collective head out of our ass and create a non-retarded health care system. Probably means a lower standard of living regardless--and I'm not just talking about income.

    7. Re:Can you blame them? by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Fixed that for you.

      I preferred the granparent's clever play on words to your hamfisted "fix".

    8. Re:Can you blame them? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland.

      I hear this a lot, and I always feel compelled to ask: why do you think Canada would want you? I have no idea how Ireland feels about immigrants from the US, but I know for a fact that Canada does not have a big sign at the border that says "Come on in and take jobs from Canadians".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    9. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certified Morons!

      I've known plenty of PhDs that weren't worth shizizzle!

    10. Re:Can you blame them? by hajus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Canadian economy is heavily linked to the US. Being a USian living in Canada, I see Canadian officials on the news constantly saying how the affect of the US economy is at fault for Canada's economic woes and explaining why economic bailouts for Canada won't work work unless the US also bails out their banks (before the US bailout). When the Canadian dollar hit above par with the US dollar, they were explaining how it could not last, because it was caused by the US dollar falling, and the Canadian dollar would not stay above the USD for long and was destined to come down as well (and eventually so it did) because of the respective and connected economies of the two countries. If you think coming to Canada will save you from the possibility of a failed US economy, I think the Canadian govt. would disagree with you.

    11. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Disclaimer: I am Mexican living in Mexico.

      I often see people from the United States complaining about their "crumbling infrastructure". I travel to the US quite often on business and I don't quite understand where this perception comes from. I have yet to see one example of actual crumbling infrastructure. The roads for the most part are smooth and well maintained. When you plug something into a socket, you can depend on it having power. So, I just don't understand how you can come to the conclusion that your infrastructure is crumbling.

      The conclusion I have reached is that you and people like yourself are simply typical ignorant Americans that having never been outside of your own backyard assume that a pothole at the end of your driveway must mean that your country is falling apart. You should be ashamed of yourself. You have no idea what real difficulty means. And that is precisely why after having possessed our country since 1492, we'll have it back piece by piece and we won't have to take it, you'll give it to us.

    12. Re:Can you blame them? by home-electro.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      When was the last time you'd been at the border?

      Just so you know, Canada takes 200000+ immigrants every year. Like green card kind of immigrants, not H1B.

      So year, consider this a sign "come and take if you can"

    13. Re:Can you blame them? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      No joke. If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada....

      Hmm. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    14. Re:Can you blame them? by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      It's not the failed economy; it's the political climate and societal priorities. Those of nearly any other "western" nation would fit me better and likely improve my life in some areas that I consider key parts of the standard of living.

    15. Re:Can you blame them? by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

      Canada arguably has the most lenient immigration policies for the educated in the world.
      All they need is for you to have a years experience in any of these sectors or have lived in Canada for a year for you to immigrate. They don't really care about your nationality as long as you speak English
      While they may not have a sign that says "Come on in and take jobs from Canadians", they certainly have a "Welcome to Canada" sign stuck on the border.

      --
      http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    16. Re:Can you blame them? by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1

      Hasn't it always been?

    17. Re:Can you blame them? by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bubba, get back under the porch, you're embarrassing all Americans.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    18. Re:Can you blame them? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      The American dream used to be a house in the country. Now it's a house in another country.

      This research is a joke.

      I never met a superior foreign engineering student to my fellow American engineering students. In fact, I discovered many of them[Foreign Engineering talent] became very proficient in cheating exams and when caught would play dumb. My favorite was watching our Thermosystems exam where the three idiots were so "intelligent" that they didn't even bother to realize they all answered the multi-stage systems verbatim.

      Hell, I discovered that if you were American, articulate and extroverted in Mechanical Engineering professors raised the bar on your design projects and presentations over your foreign counterparts. You were knocked for being better because they expected you to be better. The logic is similar to friendship where you have a mutual friendship with a person who has you and their other friend who is such a lowlife that any positive behavior is rewarded and any social behavior besides being stellar is punished. I actually had a best friend of decades tell me, ``You're right. I have extremely high expectations of you over him, because you have always expected such levels of yourself, whereas he never has done that.''

      Needless to say, that friendship ended.

      But ultimately, the ``talent'' was hired because of their advantageous VISA status to that of the US Engineering talent. Foreign help has a different set of accounting criteria to that of the American counterpart.

    19. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For an American, it is more like a street corner with a sign "Will code for food"

    20. Re:Can you blame them? by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe (in Europe you have the right to work in any country that's an EU member if you are a citizen of an EU member country). It seems that the US and Canada just have the free trade agreement but no freedom of movement agreement.

    21. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that you used African and Native Americans as examples of foreigners, it seems to show it isn't xenophobia, just good ol' fashioned racism.

    22. Re:Can you blame them? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I've been getting recruiter calls from several EU countries. Apparently Linux and open source experts are in high demand, including in Ireland.

    23. Re:Can you blame them? by twostix · · Score: 1

      Why would you be going to Ireland? It's acting as a cheap whore for abusive foreign multinationals for the last ten years has meant it has been hit harder than any other western country in the "downturn".

    24. Re:Can you blame them? by stewbee · · Score: 1

      That's just crazy talk! Why would the US want to do something as progressive as that?

      Some kidding aside, I don't think the US is quite ready for that. I think there is just too much xenophobia here. We only have two bordering nations, one of which is known for giving us easily identifiable illegal aliens (i.e. Mexicans). I 'm not saying there aren't any Canadian illegal immigrants, they are just harder to point out in a crowd. I guess it is also easier to accept a Canadian as an illegal immigrant since they primarily speak english*.

      At any rate, the point I am trying to make is that the US has only two neighboring countries when compared to Europe. We are essentially used to be left alone and not having to deal with too many neighbors. Our vitality has not been too dependent on other countries, until maybe recently if you consider how many goods we import (this could remedied if we actually produced anything here anymore). Throw in a bit of ignorance, fear, and paranoia, you get the current distrust of immigrants in the US. I would also think that to do something like this would be considered a socialist (another fear word) program and as soon as you say the 'S' word here, people automatically think of Lenin, Marx, Mao, etc... Again, this is just another play on ignorance, but oh well.

      *Quebec, of course, would the primary exception.

    25. Re:Can you blame them? by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe

      I suspect Canada would be open to such an agreement, but would require that it be reciprocal, and allow Canadians to travel and work in the US. I'm guessing that this is the sticking point. The US seems happy with the free trade agreement because Canada honours it, and the US simply ignores it whenever it is inconvenient for them (see the soft wood lumber dispute).

    26. Re:Can you blame them? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Don't know if you noticed that bridge in Missouri or wherever that collapsed a couple years back? Yeah, well that happens ALL the time here, only people don't usually get killed, and they collapse a little bit at a time (decking failures).

      Most of our bridges are pushing 50 years old. That's what's crumbling. No one likes being dumped in a river on the way to work.

    27. Re:Can you blame them? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, there is a selective portion of the population that will continue to have children in decision to abstain and continue to leech what does exist in our "retarded health care system". I believe one of them just had 8 more kids.

    28. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually prior to NAFTA, there were more Canadians illegally in the US than Mexicans.

    29. Re:Can you blame them? by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

      Canada has actually a very fair immigration system. Unlike the US that refuse B1/B2 visas to competent workers (in my industry we've had no foreign worker for 2 years now) to then give away 100,000 to 300,000 green cards every year based on a lottery (friends of mine had it that way, US got lucky that time as they are both teaching at Stanford), Canada's residence status for immigrants is granted through a point system given for skills, titles, etc., so one knows exactly if it has enough points to become a legal immigrant.

    30. Re:Can you blame them? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe (in Europe you have the right to work in any country that's an EU member if you are a citizen of an EU member country).

      There is a NAFTA visa for professionals, but it's more limited than the European agreement.

    31. Re:Can you blame them? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I often see people from the United States complaining about their "crumbling infrastructure". I travel to the US quite often on business and I don't quite understand where this perception comes from. I have yet to see one example of actual crumbling infrastructure. The roads for the most part are smooth and well maintained. When you plug something into a socket, you can depend on it having power. So, I just don't understand how you can come to the conclusion that your infrastructure is crumbling.

      Yeah, mostly the "crumbling infrastructure" thing is propaganda, used by people who want to get money to theoretically spend on fixing "crumbling infrastructure". But there are real examples of literally crumbling infrastructure in the road system, such as that bridge in Missouri which collapsed. Some of this is to be expected; infrastructure has to be maintained, and there will always be some parts of it nearing the end of its current maintenance cycle. And some is because the last place politicians like to spend money is on boring, useful stuff like road maintenance.

    32. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland."

      Leave. Please. From what I've seen, many other countries' diaspora come to the US, and improve our salad bowl of culture. I like that. So you want to leave, don't your f&f keep you. If you are so dependent on other people, maybe you are not so strong as you think you are in your life, as many people everyday willing leave countries for a better life elsewhere (and they usually come to the US).

      It's always interesting that people will look at a leader as replaceable, but while some elevated masses move out, they act as if the lower socio-economic clines cannot rise up and gaps cannot be filled. We had an entire generation of women take over male roles during a war and kicked ass, and you think a few smarts move out and it's a loss? BS. People are replaceable across the board. The problem is that you are not finding the jewels in our, sorry, my society because you are not looking or training them.

      Put it this way, the people who return to India do not have the IP or management skills to handle it in the US. Plain and simple. There was an article I believe in SciAm or MIT's tech mag that India's IP fields are so lacking, it's like a kernal in a wheat field.

      "Certainly staying here means not having kids,"

      Ahh, poor boy needs the government. You probably don't have kids because the woman you're with doesn't really want them and you pick someone who agrees with your political views. Better move to somewhere else, where most countries' population expansion is nearly negative. Clearly lots of women wanting to have kids, just not with you.

      There are many doctors who work outside the traditional health care system. If you are in a suburb or a city, you have NO excuse. There are doctors who are not affiliated with HMOs or insurance companies and only take pay out of pocket. I can find them within 3 phone calls, and I'm a damn recluse.

      Further, where are you living? Health care probably has very little to do with that decision of having kids. Nearly every, if not all, states give automatic health care to children, so I don't know where the hell you are living that doesn't. In fact, this was a Clinton-2nd Bush policy that was reinforced strongly in the transition that worked and was even extended.

      I think you probably are hooked to an HMO you don't like which you picked through your workplace, being so lame as not to use the powers of the workers to simply *ask* management (and you have asked, right???) to pick a better and accomodating HMO.

      If you are some state that somehow bungled this, get off your ass, learn which states has health care for kids aka chip, and move there instead of badmouthing the entire system as retarded, as your lack of information just makes you the same. If you haven't asked to participate in your company's plan, you have no place to whine about the decision you passively allowed to be made for you.

      "Probably means a lower standard of living regardless--and I'm not just talking about income."

      Most likely because your energy or land costs would go out the roof at the 2 places you mentioned, if simply for the magnitude to heat an equivalent place compared to where you are. I think you are thinking of greener pastures not because you've seen them and lived them, but because you dream it. That's your bias. Go pick up a few copies of Monocle and stop watching the Travel Channel for your info. Lots of countries are great and have their silver lining, but you obviously have not looked at the WHOLE picture.

      Let me tell you this--if you can't make it in the US, you probably cannot make it anywhere else. I know people who have moved to the EU, and it's a mixed bag. Some really enjoy it. Some are neutral. Some don't like it. They tend to like the social services, are less keen on the people but generally good, but find their jobs not worth the migration. Worse, a lot of them have done little in their lives compared t

    33. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm the original poster. Much like your ignorant brethren, you apparently didn't notice the report that was released shortly after that bridge collapse. According to your own NHTSA investigation, the bridge wasn't build to specifications. It didn't collapse due to neglect, but through incompetence on the part of the original builders.

      American ignorance knows no bounds.

    34. Re:Can you blame them? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      I can only relate my own personal anecdote. Last year, after attending PyCon in Chicago, I drove back to NH by going through MI, across Ottowa, to Montreal, and then south to home. When I crossed into Canada at Port Huron(? - somewhere north of Detroit; I think that was the name), the border people gave me a lot of trouble. My car got extra-special searching, and they grilled me for a while before I could go onward. They were extremely interested in my employment: whether I had a job, where I was employed, what I did for work - it went on like that for about 15 minutes. My impression at the time was that they were afraid I was sneaking into the country to steal a job from a hard-working Canadian. Eventually they let me go. I was afraid for a few minutes that I'd have to change my plans and take a different route.

    35. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme a break. Yes there are some definite xenophobes out there. The sad thing is that some people (not very many, just the ones that scream the loudest and therefore get the most attention from politicians on either side of the fence) think that xenophobes are in the majority.Why shouldn't U.S. born citizens be angered by this? Yes, it is stupid for people to get mad at immigrants at coming in and taking the lower paying jobs. Most people who complain about immigrants taking lower salary jobs had the opportunity to take them, but were to lazy or too high and mighty to do them. Jobs that require MBA's or PHD's are a different story. Although I applaud the Democrat's on getting rid of Gitmo, taxing the rich who make their insane incomes by exploiting the poor, I don't approve of affirmative action one bit. It completely destroys the merit system. Why should people have to work hard, work smart, or strive to be the best when they can just be born of a certain race or nationality? What's worse is the fact that even AFTER some of these people receive these benefits, they still aren't loyal to the country that gave them their free education, and they return to the their countries of origin to get their less fortunate countrymen to do the manual labor for them in their nice houses that they would never do now that they have their degree from an excellent college.They have allegiance to no one. Not the United States, nor their home countries.I have no problem with letting immigrants in, this nation was founded by immigrants. I do have a problem with racism. And racism is a term that doesn't just apply to white Americans. I think a lot of people have forgotten that.

    36. Re:Can you blame them? by Mex · · Score: 1

      Not only that, there is a lot of racism still in the USA. Add to that the fact that smart people don't seem to be very admired in America (ie Britney Spears vs your average google engineer)...

    37. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fix the health care system? If you have a job that does not provide health care or partly cover it and part comes out of your check directly, maybe it is time to look for another job? If you cannot afford kids, then you are making the correct choice to not have them.

      Free health care to all is not going to fix things. It will actually make it a lot worse. Is having many unemployed and healthy people a good idea? Free doctor checkups, free prescriptions, and no house, no job, no income is not a good idea. There is still a cost to all of this 'free health care'. The tax payers will have to pay it. Less people working and paying taxes the longer and bigger the debt is. Giving everyone free stuff removes the drive some people need to go out and work. Why would they need to work if they can get everything for free?

      --anon cause this is a very, very unpopular view on here. Even though it is the truth.

    38. Re:Can you blame them? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I find it bizarre that the US and Canada don't have something similar to the Schengen agreement in Europe (in Europe you have the right to work in any country that's an EU member if you are a citizen of an EU member country). It seems that the US and Canada just have the free trade agreement but no freedom of movement agreement.

      Why do you find that bizarre? Freedom of trade is very useful and profitable for large companies that give generous campaign donations to our politicians. How does freedom of movement of workers help these large companies?

    39. Re:Can you blame them? by Sarlin · · Score: 1

      Sure, take off to Ireland. May want to read this first: http://www.politics.ie/current-affairs/47394-ireland-currently-undergoing-full-scale-collapse-economic-political-social-5.html Ireland's economy is in full collapse mode. And if you don't like our health care system, just wait until the government is running it. It will be a nightmare. Our system is that you work, you pay for health care and you get it. It is not a RIGHT. Oh and Canada's economy is collapsing too. If you think you can run from this economic recession, you can't. It is world-wide.

      --
      The Thing is.
    40. Re:Can you blame them? by NeoStrider_BZK · · Score: 1

      They actually DO HAVE.Provinces are fighting each other for immigrant force. Take a look at the Toronto subway system (TTC)

    41. Re:Can you blame them? by NeoStrider_BZK · · Score: 1

      Isnt it Toronto's license place saying "yours to discover" or something like that?

    42. Re:Can you blame them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke. If not for my friends and family (primarily the former) I'd already be in Canada or Ireland. As it is, I'm hoping things get better, because if they don't then staying here will have been a huge mistake. Certainly staying here means not having kids, unless we get our collective head out of our ass and create a non-retarded health care system. Probably means a lower standard of living regardless--and I'm not just talking about income.

      Define 'non-retarded health care system'. If you're referring to the aforementioned Canada's so-called health system, then you need to come to the hospital where I work at with several Canadian nurses. Nurses who will tell you just why you don't want to be a person in urgent need of health care in Canada.

  2. Damn, that leaves me. by Bobzibub · · Score: 1

    I'll close the door! = )

  3. Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm tired of the smell of curry.

  4. visa's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont understand why we get so many potential immigrants into this country through the higher education system when we do not want to give them job opportunities. The number of visa's and offers for higher education should be correlated.

    1. Re:visa's by Orome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's also the fact that many of them get scholarships/fellowships/teaching assistantships from US universities. Essentially, American taxpayer money has gone into funding their education, and because of idiotic political reasons they are going back. Of course the layman just sees them as taking up a job, and won't see the fact that
      a) They could create more jobs
      b) A US-educated immigrant going back is a net loss (in terms of taxpayer money) for the country.

    2. Re:visa's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And what scholarships would that be? When I was a foreign undergrad I got to pay full price for the privilege of attending a U.S. university. No American taxpayer-funded scholarships whatsoever for me.

    3. Re:visa's by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I dont understand why we get so many potential immigrants into this country through the higher education system when we do not want to give them job opportunities. The number of visa's and offers for higher education should be correlated.

      While a U.S. student visa is a "potential immigration" visa (in that you're allowed to apply for permanent residence while on it), not everyone it is supposed to immigrate, and not everyone does. A lot of people come to U.S. (and other First World countries) to get quality education, and then return to their home country where its relative value is much higher.

    4. Re:visa's by Orome · · Score: 1

      I said "Many of them" and not "all of them". Perhaps I should have said "some of them". I also think that there are more scholarships available for masters/PhD programmes than for undergraduate studies.

      It just seems illogical to me that this country would not want to keep the professionals whose education they paid for.

    5. Re:visa's by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's also true that any US Educated person, immigrant or not, going to some other country is a net loss. The US person leaving is a bigger net loss, since most likely their tuition didn't contain the astronomical international student fees.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    6. Re:visa's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cite please. I'm not the AC above.

    7. Re:visa's by saiha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sometimes its a loss, sometimes it isn't. Sometimes it is only a short term loss.

      A US citizen who will probably return to the US will probably be a short-term loss with a long-term gain. A foreign citizen may bring American ideals to their home country which, barring obesity, is probably a good thing. They may also spread a view of Americans that isn't from Jerry Springer.

    8. Re:visa's by Quetzo · · Score: 1

      Funding opportunities for foreign students come from university resources only. They are not eligible for FAFSA, state or local government scholarships.

      Fellowships are rare, most foreign graduate students end up getting a teaching assistantship or research assistantship. Undergrads don't even have that. Further, they cannot take up jobs off-campus which generally pay as much or better than on-campus jobs.

    9. Re:visa's by Quetzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, at least while I was a grad student, an (F1) student visa was only able to get you a 1 year apprenticeship after graduation. No way to apply for residency.

      If the company you apprentice with for a year decides to keep you on, they sponsor an H1B visa that allows you to apply for residency.

      The process of actually getting residency is horribly convoluted and takes between 5 and 8 years to complete. Not to mention all the shyster lawyers out there (yechh).

    10. Re:visa's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sometimes its a loss, sometimes it isn't.

      Sometimes it isn't a loss because sometimes the person leaving is a moron.

      Examples of a non-lossy emigration:

      Darl McBride emigrates from the U.S. to anywhere that is not the U.S.
      Jack Thompson emigrates from the U.S. to anywhere that is not the U.S.

      There are countless other examples of non-lossy emigration, but I feel these two suffice to make the point.

    11. Re:visa's by sbeckstead · · Score: 1

      Then stop paying to educate them and start paying to educate US! Stupid justification man.

    12. Re:visa's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of undergraduate studies, those foreign students bring in ridiculous amounts of money in tuition fees. I know, because my parents paid a six digit number for me to go to school in the US. It's very profitable for the US to issue student visas.

    13. Re:visa's by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      The problem is, for the same grade and academic quality, it is far easier for an international student to get financial aid then U.S. Citizens / Permanent resident. FOr us, we can only get loans, while international students get loads of assistantships.

      Here is why... it is easier for the professors to abuse international students.

    14. Re:visa's by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      And what scholarships would that be? When I was a foreign undergrad I got to pay full price for the privilege of attending a U.S. university. No American taxpayer-funded scholarships whatsoever for me.

      Shoulda' been Chinese. Most of the Chinese students at the univerity I attended were there on the Chinese government's dime.The university loved them, because they paid full out-of-state tuition rates. Then they graduate and go home.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:visa's by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but if you think "highly educated" means "undergrad"...

      TFA is talking about people with Masters, PhDs. Undergrads rarely get TA jobs, they're usually reserved for graduates pursuing a Masters.

    16. Re:visa's by JoshHeitzman · · Score: 1

      The same is true for H1-Bs. Don't want to work all kinds of overtime? Fine, don't get wet on the way back to your country.

      --
      Software Inventor
    17. Re:visa's by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      It's also not a loss when that person returns to live and work in the US and has a wider world view than someone whose idea of a world view is that the can see Russia from their house.

      They will have a broader world view and they can impart some of this on the folks back home as well. This can only be a good thing and every country everywhere could use more of it.

  5. Get-Out-Sourcing? by NickyGotz22 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you think this will mean jobs in India and China will get outsourced to a broke white boy like me now?

    --
    Test me and I will chronicle your pain - The Archivist (Diablo 3)
    1. Re:Get-Out-Sourcing? by vk2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you think this will mean jobs in India and China will get outsourced to a broke white boy like me now?

      Your burger flipping skills are of no use; Indians generally are vegetarians and those who eat meat prefer chicken and/or lamb. Off course you could learn to cook chat items and open your own dhela on chowpati.

      --
      No Sig for you.!
    2. Re:Get-Out-Sourcing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Your burger flipping skills are of no use; Indians generally are vegetarians and those who eat meat prefer chicken and/or lamb. Off course you could learn to cook chat items and open your own dhela on chowpati.

      And it takes a PHD to be a call-center slave in India?

  6. There's plenty of room. by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact of the matter is that intelligent foreigners exist. They can work here, or they can work there. The question, then, is it better if they work here or there?

    The answer is obvious - we want them here.

    As for 'room' for American citizens, if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you. Either way, he deserves your job, and the American company hiring him shouldn't be saddled with your either less-intelligent or less-driven self just because the more qualified candidate was born in the wrong spot.

    1. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the lamest argument I have ever heard. Sure Americans should be able to compete for the job, but at what cost? Everyone knows companies hire foreigners on H1B's because they generally work for less money. And to think moments ago I was posting in another article about American quality of life and how it was created by the middle class. I agree that the best (wo)man should get the job, foreign or domestic. I also think that our country will only sustain that for so long. Would you kindly explain to me where the balancing point is?

    2. Re:There's plenty of room. by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with this. If someone is willing to do your job for less than you are, or is able to do a better job at the same rate, then they should get the job over you. However, in many cases, the people they are hiring aren't necessarily better at the job, or better motivated. In many cases the only deciding factor is how cheaply they will work, regardless of whether they are getting sub-standard results out of the employees. No customer likes tech support from overseas, yet many companies provide this, simply to decrease operation costs. The customers are unhappy, but the business makes more money in the long run.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Precisely. I can compete with Indians that live around the corner. They have to pay the same taxes (mostly), and they have comparable expenses. If technology continues to shift from the United States to India, however, American technology workers are screwed.

      As long as all of the truly bright people in the world come to the U.S. to work then the U.S. will continue to have a long-lasting advantage over the rest of the world. When that stops happening, then the U.S. economy is really headed for trouble.

    4. Re:There's plenty of room. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 0

      Lower costs equal lower cost products. Lower cost products = dollar that goes farther, which means that less money is needed to survive.

      --
      SSC
    5. Re:There's plenty of room. by ejtttje · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree, and I'll add this assumes the foreign graduates can get the visa and work permits needed to stay in the US. The harder we make it for them to stay, the more go back to their homes.

      For anyone who complains about competition from foreign workers for US jobs, consider if they go home, they will be assisting or starting competing companies there. Then it's just *your personal* job that has competition, its the *entire company*, and if the foreign company wins out, *all* the jobs get laid off.

      It is by far in our best interest to try to keep all the best and brightest here in our country... we should only be so lucky to have such a draw...

    6. Re:There's plenty of room. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is likely to increase offshoring of American jobs.

      However, I think that aside from effects on commodity prices, more distribution of wealth in the knowledge industry will probably help considerably in improving the standard of living for everyone.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    7. Re:There's plenty of room. by technomom · · Score: 1

      Mostly that's true, but I'll quibble a little.

      Just like anything else that has price, your replacement doesn't have to be better. He or she just has to be good enough to get the job done.

      There's a difference.

    8. Re:There's plenty of room. by joeflies · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that you ignore the fact that the H1-B's arent' competing with you on the open market. The h1-b must work there, or leave the country within 10 days if they can't find a new position.

      So the H1-B's are working here with a neck in the guillotine - work hard, accept the conditions, and take the pay they are given or go home. They don't have a choice of finding another job they may be highly qualified for without having to get a sponsor.

      So employers fill these slots with employees who will work longer and work cheaper in order to stay in the US. Does that really sound like you have a fair shot of getting that job just because you're more qualified.

    9. Re:There's plenty of room. by saiha · · Score: 1

      Actually I didn't interpret raehl's post specifically in value/dollar. The reason it doesn't really work here is we are talking about the smart creative people, something that is more (in my opinion) than simply doing a job.

      Yes someone could do my "job" for less money but I believe I put more into it than simply fulfilling some basic requirements. So instead of money, I compete on qualifications and ability. If I cannot compete with a foreigner then I either need to apply to a different/less job or get more education.

      The problem is that money is often a factor, immigrants will work for less until they are established here, which is where a lot of the resentment comes from that I have seen.

    10. Re:There's plenty of room. by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Another good question is why we aren't putting the money we put into these people into our own citizens; citizens who will be much less likely to sneak off and leave the hand that fed them out to dry.

    11. Re:There's plenty of room. by divisionbyzero · · Score: 1

      "...he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you..."

      or just plain will accept less pay. Obviously it's not always the case but it plays a part. For the most part it's more of an issue for so-called "unskilled" labor where cost is the only differentiation between employees.

    12. Re:There's plenty of room. by Teckla · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As for 'room' for American citizens, if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you.

      Oh my God, you're such an insulting ass. And you got modded +5 for it! Unbelievable.

      Even if H-1B workers are good for the U.S., which is debatable, it doesn't matter in the long run, because American companies will continue to offshore work because of the cost of living in the U.S.

      It simply does not matter if an American is equal to, or better than, a foreign counterpart, because the American has an insanely high cost of living and cannot hope to compete wage-wise with someone that lives in a country with a low cost of living.

      The H-1B debate is pointless. Americans are too expensive, even H-1B's living in America are too expensive. The trend will be to continue to offshore the work in order to leverage lower costs of living elsewhere.

    13. Re:There's plenty of room. by hemp · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way about illegal aliens. If they are willing to work for less money, put up with racial and sexual harassment, and get cheated out of their wages, then they deserve your job.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    14. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      help considerably in improving the standard of living for everyone.

      The wealth of a few hundred million Americans spread among the billions of the rest of the world will buy everyone an extra bowl of rice for dinner tonight. The world thanks you.

    15. Re:There's plenty of room. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      with all your American-born advantages

      Would one of those "advantages" be an educational system that prefers the affective domain to the cognitive?

    16. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for 'room' for American citizens, if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you.

      Except that indian guy has a Phd that his affluent parent bought for him back home and he is willing to work for $50k a year. It really doesn't matter if he is more skilled, smarter, or works harder. He has a Phd and only wants $50k.

    17. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you ever actually worked with creating software? Lower cost developers equals far worse code equals shitter software equals products that end up not being able to compete. That means you have to shut down.

      Want an example? Look at some of the projects Motorola closed recently. Wanna know why it was closed down? They added a lot of "cheap" workers that produced code that honestly was offensive to anyone with a proper education / proper knowledge of software.

      Lowering costs often means something gotta give, only when you can produce with the same quality but at a lower price can you continue to compete.

    18. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone knows companies hire foreigners on H1B's because they generally work for less money.

      Then give them Green Cards so they can work freely for any employer, and let a real market set the wage, not the bogus Department of Labor "prevailing wage" number that's required for the H-1B. Give 'em green cards so that they can stay (and continue to pay taxes) here, rather than threatening to kick 'em out after 3 or 6 years.

      I want to compete on an equal footing. But if the US would prefer to concentrate on accomodating the needs of companies who hire low-skilled agriculltural workers, so be it. If the US would really rather get the income taxes from people who make $12K/year rather than $120K/year, so be it. If the US really wants its high-tech immigrants to GTFO, then fine, we'll go back home, and take our minds - and what they produce - with us. Who is John Galt?

    19. Re:There's plenty of room. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It simply does not matter if an American is equal to, or better than, a foreign counterpart, because the American has an insanely high cost of living and cannot hope to compete wage-wise with someone that lives in a country with a low cost of living.

      And so what's the answer? We have several possible ways to fix this, which do you prefer?

      -Reduce the American standard of living via increased immigration to correct the high cost of labor?
      -Increase the global standard of living via offshoring to correct their low cost of labor?
      -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      In all seriousness, if we open the gates to immigration, we'll reduce the cost of American labor and thus be more competitive from a labor standpoint... and if we do it via naturalization instead of stupid H1-B and other temporary visas, we'll get to *keep* the best and brightest here. If we continue to offshore jobs that we cannot compete with on labor costs, we'll raise the standard of living overseas and help level the playing field.

      The truth of the matter is that the US standard of living is unsustainable, we've only kept it high so long by leveraging limited natural resources (like fossil fuels) and borrowing.

      An adjustment will happen, and the US standard of living will become more like the rest of the world's... but the question is if we can help ensure that this is by elevating the SoL outside the US, or if it will be simply a reduction in the SoL in the US. I know which I'd prefer (both for selfish and humanitarian reasons).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    20. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jurily · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As long as all of the truly bright people in the world come to the U.S. to work then the U.S. will continue to have a long-lasting advantage over the rest of the world.

      Maybe you should fix your educational system so you'd have smart people on your own. Of course that means you'd also have to pay real wages to teachers, fire the incompetent ones who are unable to learn anything new, but have laid low long enough so you can't fire them legally, etc.

      Oh, and actually teach the kids to think for themselves. In short: I don't see that happening anytime soon.

      P.S. Do any of you find idiotic as well, that kids should learn everything at the same age, regardless of talent, abilities, potential and personal interests? For example, I've learned English from Cartoon Network, and by the time I got to English class at age 14, I was laughing at my teacher's horrible accent. Yet I still had to sit there for four years.

    21. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everytime I end up with overseas tech support I end up never again wanting to anything to do with that company again. They are 100% sure to loose business with someone like me.

      It is often also not a question of working for less, but working for far less human rights/privileges. Seeing other humans as resources to take as much advantage of as possible tends to bring out the pitchforks in the long run.

      That being said, I think that it is already pitchfork time to be honest considering what total asshats and assholes today's CEOs are 99% of the time...

    22. Re:There's plenty of room. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Actually H1B Visa Workers are used because they are willing to work for a fraction of the salary that a US born worker wants to work for.

      Now that the US Economy has tanked thanks to Bush and now Obama, it is better for them to go back to their native country of origin and work there and take all the money they saved up back home and live like a King or Queen.

      They aren't smarter than us, they aren't harder working either, they just are willing to work for less money. Otherwise Offshoring and H1B Visa legal fees and paperwork would not be worth it. Management is always trying to find ways to save money.

      This means the US IT and Engineering jobs are going to go back to US Citizens as the Immigrants are going home in the masses.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    23. Re:There's plenty of room. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If someone is willing to do your job for less than you are, or is able to do a better job at the same rate, then they should get the job over you.

      I'll accept that once I can do the same thing to a guy in switzerland.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    24. Re:There's plenty of room. by einhverfr · · Score: 1

      But that isn't quite the way it works.

      Most of these countries really would buy more American products if finances allowed. I have spent a considerable amount of time overseas and can say that with near certainty. This isnt a zero-sum game once intangible goods are added to the system.

      The only real problem is that of commodity prices. More wealth in India and China mean more factories being built, more cars being purchased, higher consumptions there of oil, coal, etc. and hence higher prices for commodities across the board. What this is likely to mean is that tangible, shipped goods will become more expensive while intangible goods will become less.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    25. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, stealing isn't only done by Wall Street. The U.S. also steals talent that other countries spent so much money to train. This view is becoming prevalent in the rest of the world.

    26. Re:There's plenty of room. by keeboo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Another good question is why we aren't putting the money we put into these people into our own citizens; citizens who will be much less likely to sneak off and leave the hand that fed them out to dry.

      Ohh... Poor Uncle Sam.

      Let's say a guy gets his education in his home country. It was paid somehow, perhaps the local government paid for him, or perhaps he's indebted. In either case, it's not a trivial amount of money.
      Then the guy goes to the U.S. to work. The U.S. did not pay a dime for his education, nor any other expenses he/his_parents/his_country had with him during his whole life. The U.S. did not invest in him, he came ready and is immediately productive.
      Will the U.S. take the less qualified people and educate them? Sorry, no. Instead the U.S. cherry picks the best, for free, at the expense of the rest of the World.

      And what if he never returns, what about his home country losing a highly qualified person? Well, that's just too bad.

      And the U.S. won't be giving anything for free. No way, the guy's going to work his ass off (or else), he'll pay the same taxes as the locals but will have less rights.

      If there's a parasite in this history, it's not the foreign guy.

    27. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That is exactly right. They work hard with the idea that their hard work will pay off later on. They believe that all you need to do is work hard and tough through the hard times and later when they become established they will benefit from it. But instead they get replaced by another ignorant sap who is willing to work hard for nothing because they believe it will pay off in the end.

    28. Re:There's plenty of room. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe you should fix your educational system so you'd have smart people on your own. Of course that means you'd also have to pay real wages to teachers, fire the incompetent ones who are unable to learn anything new, but have laid low long enough so you can't fire them legally, etc.

      Oh, and actually teach the kids to think for themselves. In short: I don't see that happening anytime soon.

      I'm American, and I can't tell you how much I share this desire for a better pubic educational system for the US. I would very much love to see the average US citizen be able to think for himself, rather than just absorb all the crap thrown at us through too many advertisements every day. If you're an average American (at least, this is my impression from what I see as stereotypes), your computer is Windows, your cable and Internet are Comcast high-speed (which isn't that fast on an absolute scale), you bought your car because either (a) it looks nice or (b) you heard that it's environmentally friendly, you work from 9 to 5 five days a week for a middle-class paycheck. And this little bubble is pretty much your life. It's safe. There's no need to think for yourself; the companies you pay monthly for their services have already done that for you.

      Screw that. I wanna make my own decisions about stuff I do and buy!

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    29. Re:There's plenty of room. by Superdarion · · Score: 1

      The H-1B debate is pointless. Americans are too expensive, even H-1B's living in America are too expensive. The trend will be to continue to offshore the work in order to leverage lower costs of living elsewhere.

      That's what "he's either just plain smarter than you..." is talking about: One Indian and one American, both living in the US. If the Indian (having, as you said, the same living costs) is getting Your job (despite all your american-born advantages), then he's just plain smarter or more hard-working.

      That's the price of globalization: you're now competing against the whole world to get a job, even if that job is in a company just around the corner from your house.

    30. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      [Citation Needed]

    31. Re:There's plenty of room. by Udigs · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. If someone is willing to do your job for less than you are, or is able to do a better job at the same rate, then they should get the job over you.

      So what you're saying is that you're anti-union, huh? :)

    32. Re:There's plenty of room. by c6gunner · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why couldn't you?

    33. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't wait for the first wave of immigrant technical workers to reach middle-age. I'm going to laugh my ass off when they start complaining about competition from younger, smarter, harder-working people. I can't wait until they have to visit the chiropractor 2 to 3 times a week for their chronic neck and back pain from all the time they spent hunched over a computer. It'll be amusing when they are completely screwed by the companies they helped build and divorced by their spouses for years of neglect.

      I'm guessing that the ones that go back to their countries of origin will be the lucky ones. They'll probably go back to a more "humanly" paced culture that believes that families really do take care of each other instead of farming the old folks out to some Dickensian nursing home.

      As long as the U.S. maintains its dominance in the world there will always be some country where the young people will long to be a "corporate tool". Buy hey, I'm not bitter. No, just wiser.

    34. Re:There's plenty of room. by c6gunner · · Score: 0, Troll

      Will the U.S. take the less qualified people and educate them? Sorry, no

      Sorry, yes. The US takes in 200,000+ refugees annually. Refugees, as opposed to immigrants, generally tend to be poorly educated and impoverished.

      And then there's the Mexicans .... :)

    35. Re:There's plenty of room. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      [Citation Needed]

      Citations:

      http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Protectionism.html
      For you Austrian school folks (God, I can't believe I'm linking to Mises to support my position): http://mises.org/rothbard/protectionism.asp
      For the interventionists, a counterpiece by Krugman, saying protectionism has a place... provided that other means fail: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/01/protectionism-and-stimulus-wonkish/
      Another piece:http://www.morganstanley.com/views/gef/archive/2007/20070126-Fri.html

      In the news, another danger of protectionism (as was seen in the great depression): http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/world/world/general/wto-fears-protectionism-domino-effect/1449424.aspx

      The risk is that we adopt protectionist policies, and other nations adopt them against us -- but not with eachother. Thus we get left behind in the expansionary economies the other nations will go through. This is the problem that Krugman misses... protectionism globally will reduce the impact of economic problems in each country on the whole, only if the protectionism is directed to all trading partners. If the EU, for example, raises protective barriers agains the US, but not the rest of the world, we've got problems. Please note that this is in re: protective trade restrictions; subsidies (like the stimulus package) are another form of protectionism, that by nature are partner-agnostic, and I think this form of protectionism is what Krugman refers to.

      However, we're discussing labor protectionism, which is a slightly different beast.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    36. Re:There's plenty of room. by poliopteragriseoapte · · Score: 1

      This is the best comment I have seen so far!

    37. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... if you can't compete with a guy who was born in India, with all your American-born advantages, he's either just plain smarter than you, or just plain works harder than you. Either way, he deserves your job, and the American company hiring him shouldn't be saddled with your either less-intelligent or less-driven self just because the more qualified candidate was born in the wrong spot.

      OK, the average Indian is just plain better than me at keeping quiet, taking crap and sucking up to the boss. Also better at puffing up his resume with whatever it takes to get hired and better at saying what the interviewer wants to hear. And, he will do all that for less.

      I'm sure many Indians are better than me technically, but that's not why they get hired first and that's not why they keep their job when I get laid off.

      I think companies, if they knew what was good for them, would choose to be "saddled" with me and people like me because, if they don't, they will eventually wind up operating like the government of Saddam Hussein and probably will not end as well.

    38. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and the "guy" born in India is more likely to argue, more likely to lie on his resume and more likely to say he knows something that he doesn't.

      I really like some Indian guys I've worked with in IT, but a lot of them are just full of crap, average grade programmers.

      Probably about 75% of the Indian's I've worked with lie about their technical skills.

      I'm one American that is gainfully employed because I have to fix and re-write half the code done by Indians here on H1B Visas.

      And then I have waste time arguing with Indians about why their code doesn't work.

      Indians seem to have a culture where they immediately attack or challenge anyone verbally that doesn't agree with them. They especially exhibit this behavior when they don't know what they are talking about.

      And then when you find a bug in code that they wrote, they immediately try to put the blame back on you or divert it to someone else.

      I say good bye and don't come back. We ( American Programmers ) were writing fine code before you guys showed up.

    39. Re:There's plenty of room. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      High cost and low quality are not mutually exclusive.
      See: thedailywtf.com, and Monster cables

    40. Re:There's plenty of room. by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      The customers are unhappy, but the business makes more money in the short run.

      Corrected that for you. If business were in it for the long run, so many wouldn't be losing money hand over fist right now. Myopic business practices are the principle reason for the current economic downturn. The corrections that we see happen right now are better for the long run: greater personal saving, less foreign labor, less credit, less risky investment strategy, etc. The current trend of "brain drain" is but one part of the correction cycle and I welcome it.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    41. Re:There's plenty of room. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows companies hire foreigners on H1B's because they generally work for less money....Would you kindly explain to me where the balancing point is?

      Mandate equal wages? Maybe even above average wages?
      These visas are being requested on the presumption that there is a shortage of qualified people here. Surely if the company actually needs 'em they won't hesitate to pay a little extra?

    42. Re:There's plenty of room. by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Sounds like concerns for the establishments those people are coming from, just as my original point relates to the US.

      In a way, your intentional derailment of the point I had made serves to reinforce the point. Thanks!

    43. Re:There's plenty of room. by tempest69 · · Score: 1
      ok..

      I don't mind competing on a level. What I dont care for is competing with someone with his sweet and tenders in a vice. They are stuck with no power in the employer-employee relationship.. This means I am competing with someone who is scared to ask for a raise, or to quit, or say shove it when asked to do a 90 hour week.

      As an employer... I want the slave. Why bother with someone who will complain "these fumes are toxic" or "I think I need an ambulance"

      Let me fight on the level

      Storm

    44. Re:There's plenty of room. by keeboo · · Score: 1

      Sounds like concerns for the establishments those people are coming from, just as my original point relates to the US.

      In a way, your intentional derailment of the point I had made serves to reinforce the point. Thanks!

      Derailment? I disagree. I found your comment intriging and I simply added a view from the other side as counterbalance.
      Though your thinking may cause a effect which, let's say, may solve the situation I've described, its purpose is different.

      Regardless of that, you're welcome!

    45. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fucking bullshit because they usually can't do it better, only cheaper. H1B employees are usually worse in my experience. They just get paid lower than a US worker would and most are stuck in their situations because they want to get their green card.

      They are not doing anything that you can't find a US worker to do. In my present company we have an entry level Java guy and a entry level Oracle Developer girl, both H1B. We could easily find US workers for these jobs.

    46. Re:There's plenty of room. by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      to sum it up: High Quality, Low Costs, On Time. Pick 2

      --
      TIAEAE!
    47. Re:There's plenty of room. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Making them citizens, or even green card holders tends to even this out, don't you think?

      Instead of competing with effectively what is indentured servitude, you'll be competing with full-fledged citizens.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    48. Re:There's plenty of room. by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      As a future teacher, I would love for my students to think for themselves. But I'm not sure that I can do that without bursting a lot of bubbles. Many people think that it's okay to coast through life without ever accomplishing anything. I would still be one of those people if it weren't for a Physics instructor that I had who lit a fire under my ass. I plan to light a fire under the collective butts of all my students. All I can hope for is that their parents don't try to light a fire under mine.

      *Read on for a mildly confusing rant.*

      While we're on the subject, what ever happened to people researching products that they buy and understanding the merits of a particular product? Has anyone ever bought a tool, for example, based on a particular design? It seems to me that if we want to change how people think we need to focus their attention on their buying habits. I've bought some pretty expensive and poorly designed tools. I've also bought cheaper tools and have found that they are constructed much better than the more expensive tools(Irwin versus Stanley).

      For example, there are probably 5 or 6 different designs for Cat's Paws depending on what you need. One even comes with a beer bottle opener and a socket for changing saw blades. But the best cats paw I've used is dirt simple and cheap. All it is is a couple of flat V-shaped pieces of metal connected by a steel bar. It doesn't destroy boards like the narrower designs, and it also doesn't break nail heads as easily.

      The day that we said it was okay to make decisions on instinct based on marketing was the day that we killed reason and critical thinking. And the beer bottle opener is definitely an instinct feature.

      *Rant over.*

      The dearth of critical thinking and reflection in our culture will be our downfall. Nobody thinks about what they do anymore, they just do it and expect things to change. Things often do not change if behavior does not change, and behavior doesn't change without conscious effort.

      Don't you love people who rant?

      --
      SRSLY.
    49. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H-1B debate is pointless. Americans are too expensive, even H-1B's living in America are too expensive. The trend will be to continue to offshore the work in order to leverage lower costs of living elsewhere.

      Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains. --Jefferson

    50. Re:There's plenty of room. by twostix · · Score: 1

      Err you forgot the most potent way to fix it

      - Impose tariffs on products produced in brutal authoritarian third world countries who make full use of state sanctioned slave labor. They can either clean their act up and start competing on a level ground or stay where they are.

      Throughout this entire thread you keep arguing that Americans (and by Americans I assume you mean the west) must reduce their standard of living.

      But why? Because you say so?

      People in western countries must reduce their standard of living (share of the wealth) to that of the average person in China to allow a tiny tiny fraction of people...in the west...to continue to increase their share of the wealth??

      Because that's what it boils down to, western companies who each decade are benefiting a smaller and smaller group of people making full use of subjugated peoples in third world countries to produce things so they don't have to pay a fair market price for labour in their own or *other* FREE AND OPEN countries. So your saying that we - in the middle and lower classes of free countries should allow that? We as individuals should reduce our standard of living to that of the third world so that we can compete with slave labour to allow the 1% at the "top" to take ever increasing portions of their respective countries wealth?

      We should do that just to satisfy some pseudo-intellectuals completely imaginary dogma?

      Righteo, got ya.

      I wonder if you would have applied the same arguments when the northern states where arguing that they couldn't compete with the southern states and their slave labour. "You must decrease your standard of living to that of the Slave in Texas!" - Red Flayer

      The funny thing is that the west, each and every western country rose to power and accumulated their wealth with *all sorts* of protectionism in place. JUST LIKE CHINA AND INDIA HAVE IN PLACE RIGHT NOW.

      Strangely we never seem to hear about that from you and your ilk, it's always conveniently forgotten when people such as yourself are lecturing everyone on your religious ideas.

    51. Re:There's plenty of room. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Because the swiss have some sort of problem with a foreigner just waltzing into their country and taking a job when they've already got swiss that can do it. Most countries are like this, so the way of things is that Indian jobs are reserved for Indians, Chinese jobs for Chinese, and American jobs for Americans.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    52. Re:There's plenty of room. by randallman · · Score: 1

      -Reduce the American standard of living via increased immigration to correct the high cost of labor? -Increase the global standard of living via offshoring to correct their low cost of labor? -Cause stagnation via protectionist policies, then wait for other nations to pass us by on their way to a higher standard of livin and eocnomic vitality?

      A form of protectionism. We should require that our labor standards be upheld regardless of location. Otherwise, the only way to compete is to drop our labor standards. Consider that.

      • Get a hand cut off. You're fired because you are now useless.
      • 40 hour work week. Probably more like 100+.
      • Sick days. Na. Suck it up.
      • Oh yea. Your children will need to work too.

      We can't hold one standard here and another one somewhere else. Example: My dad works on an oil rig and said they couldn't use it anymore because it didn't meet safety and environmental standards. One of the issues was there were no catalytic converters on the generators. So they were going to sell it to someone in another country. That way, someone else can get hurt and pollute their air (oh wait).

      Certainly there are details that would be hard to work out, but if we took a general stance that our standards had to be upheld when off-shoring, I think that would be sustainable.

      --Randall

    53. Re:There's plenty of room. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I plan to light a fire under the collective butts of all my students.

      As, an ex-teacher, I wish you good luck. You'll need it.

    54. Re:There's plenty of room. by remmelt · · Score: 1

      You make the USA sound so leader-like.

    55. Re:There's plenty of room. by remmelt · · Score: 1

      And so what's the answer? We have several possible ways to fix this, which do you prefer?
       

      A full-blown recession, resetting the absurd living standards people have now. That would really come in handy.
      If everyone would be modest with their needs, there would be no need for lots of the mass production culture we have now.

      Thank god for the recession!

    56. Re:There's plenty of room. by snaz555 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because the swiss have some sort of problem with a foreigner just waltzing into their country and taking a job when they've already got swiss that can do it.

      As a scientist with a PhD and in your early 30s (i.e. with about 10 years' experience) you would:
      1. Fly to Switzerland and stay up to 90 days without a visa if you're American/Canadian
      2. Find employment in your field.
      3. Have the employer obtain a specialist visa.
      4. Work ten months.
      5. Get an unlimited "C" work permit/visa.

      With a "C" visa you're no longer tied to that particular employer but can move freely on the labor market.

      Much easier than if you're an Indian PhD who wants to work in the U.S. - or a Swiss one for that matter. H1Bs are far more restrictive, and there is nothing like the Swiss "C" visa for when you're somewhere between H1B and permanent residency (at 48months IIRC). You also won't have to jump through silly administrative hoops, like go back to your home country to apply for the visa. And the Swiss will be nice, polite, and actually helpful at the border and immigration offices. As opposed to the snarling, incompetent, rude, bottom-of-the-barrel idiots you encounter here. If there's something wrong with your application or paperwork they will helpfully suggest how to correct it. Again, very different from U.S. government standards.

    57. Re:There's plenty of room. by Builder · · Score: 1

      As someone who has worked all over the world, it's FAR easier to get work in most places than the USA. The US have possibly the most aggressive requirements for immigrant workers.

      Stop bitching - if you want to go work somewhere else and you're even remotely good at your job, it's a doddle.

    58. Re:There's plenty of room. by Meneguzzi · · Score: 1

      One thing to remember is that the real rise of the American Empire (and I don't mean empire in a bad sense), was mostly during WWII, when the racial policies of Germany and the war in Europe drove the smartest people (who decided to get the hell out of Europe before the crap hit the fan) into America. That influx of great minds included of course Einstein, von Neumann, Goedel, Fermi among many others that really made a difference as to where the great technologies of the 20th century would be created. After the war, America got some of the best German scientists as well (like Wernher von Braun), and during the cold war many great Soviet scientists defected to America as well. I think is undeniable that America's current strength has more than a little influence from immigration.

      --
      www.meneguzzi.eu/felipe
    59. Re:There's plenty of room. by gtall · · Score: 1

      "Now that the US Economy has tanked thanks to Bush and now Obama" You are forgetting the number one reason the American economy has tanked: Americans. It was Americans who over indulged in debt, who insist on not insisting on better schools, who refuse to invest in infrastructure, who reward companies for thinking about only the next quarters' results. Bush and Obama are not blameless, but they didn't cause the major problems, we did.

      Gerry

    60. Re:There's plenty of room. by HuguesT · · Score: 0, Troll

      Informative, mod parent up please.

    61. Re:There's plenty of room. by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      4. Work ten months.
      5. Get an unlimited "C" work permit/visa.

      10 months ? It takes 5 *years* of permanent residency for a US Citizen to be eligible for a C Permit in Switzerland (and it wasn't that long ago it was 10 years, like it is for most other non-EU nationalities) - and being "eligible" is in no way a rubber stamp for being "approved".

      Your steps 2 and 3 are also very optimistic, given that an American won't even be _considered_ for a Swiss job until the Swiss and EU applicants have turned it down.

      Switzerland is a very closed market, from the perspective of foreigners being employed. Especially if you're non-EU.

    62. Re:There's plenty of room. by Cormacus · · Score: 1

      You make a good point - it ain't easy for a US citizen to get a job overseas. But look at it this way - when well trained, intelligent, creative people compete for jobs, more jobs are created.

      So where would you rather have that guy with a Master's degree in materials science (who just happens to come from Switzerland) working? In Switzerland? Or in the US? The location of his job is going to influence where his innovations are manufactured, marketed, and owned.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    63. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe its the socialist in me that finds this funny - The gap between your cost of living and average minimum wage is so vast that its now effecting everyone from the middle class and down (as opposed to just the bottom of the barrel) - so now you want to up the min wage, or bring in protectionism or generally just take back everything thats ever been said about free markets - because finally its your fat butts on the line as well!! Finally you realise that there are actual barriers to wealth and its not just a matter of how hard you work...

      Its sodding hilarious from my point of view (where I've learned how to live happily on a £16k salary )- please keep this up :)

    64. Re:There's plenty of room. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Very good point, I agree that would help... it would raise the labor cost in those countries, better allowing us to compete (while being a very humanitarian achievement as well).

      But, I wonder how well the international community would respond, it reeks of American Imperialism, and this taint is already hurting us wrt demand for our products/services.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    65. Re:There's plenty of room. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      The imbalance in the American standard of living vs. the world, along with the commensurate trade imbalance, is starting to correct itself.

      The world systems was built on Americans have artificially inflated purchasing power fluffed up by easy credit. This allowed the standard of living to increase without actually paying American workers all that much more (the growth in pay occuring only at the top level.) Of course, what happened is that easy credit didn't just affect consumer markets, which would have been fine, more or less, but it hit housing markets, inflating values, creating debt loads that too many consumers couldn't afford (while they were being assured that they would always have positive equity, that housing values always went up, etc.)

      Then, of course, those mortgages were turned into the investment vehicle of choice. It was inevitable that the house of cards would come down. Interesting that it came down at the site of the American dream: home ownership.

    66. Re:There's plenty of room. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      This is correct. The cheap-labor, easy-credit party is over. The US joins the rest of the world now.

    67. Re:There's plenty of room. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      And much of the hubris which led to this situation had its origin in the Bush 1 and Clinton years, in the triumphalism which accompanied the end of the Cold War.

    68. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Our higher education system is the best in the world, and the U.S. does far more research in almost any subject than anyone else.

      Interestingly enough, our public educational system is also world class through about the fourth grade. After that, we don't do so well. However, for the involved parent in the U.S. it is pretty easy to guarantee your child a good public education, and there's always private school.

      Sure, it would be nice if we could find some way to motivate more Americans to push themselves harder, but that's just not going to happen. I went to high school in South America, and most Americans are never going to have the same drive that pushes the best and brightest from the third world to succeed. For people in many countries being the best of the best is almost a matter of survival.

      As long as these people come to America to finish their education and finally to work, the United States is going to have an advantage over the rest of the world.

      Unfortunately, too many in the technology business in the U.S. don't understand this concept. They've never lived outside the U.S., and they don't understand that the only thing giving the U.S. a technology edge is the fact that we've been siphoning the cream of the world's crop for decades. Right now it almost doesn't matter where the geniuses are born, if they are going to live up to their potential they probably need to come to the U.S.

      If that changes, then the U.S. economy is in for a world of hurt.

    69. Re:There's plenty of room. by pavon · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree that our educational system could use some improvement. However, there will always be people that are naturally better at some tasks then others, and given the population of India and China there is bound to be a larger number of naturally talented people born there than in the US. The more that we can do to get the top 10% of people around the world to move to the US, the better of the US will be because of it. This is done by having the best research institutes, the best engineering firms, and the fewest barriers to citizenship for these people.

      None of those goals are mutually exclusive with improving education here in the US. In fact, the quality of our higher education institutes is one of the main reasons we have had so many intelligent immigrants in the past.

    70. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are so many choices these days when it comes to almost any purchase that we take shortcuts. Economists call this imperfect knowledge. The basic idea is that doing the proper research to find the very best tool at the very best price is too expensive. Sure, my Stanley tool might cost a $1 more than your superior Irwin tool, but my Stanley tool was good enough and I get to spend my time using the tool instead of doing research. My time is far more valuable than the money I might have saved getting precisely the right tool.

      In the case of you and your cat's paw you probably enjoyed doing the research. You are interested in tools and woodworking and so the trade off is worth it. I can guarantee it that there are lots of other choices that you make based entirely on marketing. You probably haven't done a comparative analysis on dental floss, for example, or window cleaners, or shoes. You haven't visited every restaurant in your area and tried every dish so that you can be sure you are getting the best deal for your money. Heck, there are probably some things that you eat on a regular basis that you wouldn't touch with a barge pole if you knew how they were made.

      What's more, if you would have spent more time looking you probably could have gotten the exact same good cat's paw, by the same manufacturer, at a much better price. At some point, however, you decided to give up your search for perfection, and you settled for a tool and a price that was "good enough."

      That's just economics. The basic premise is that everyone makes the choices that have the lowest opportunity costs. If someone makes a different decision than you would make that simply means that they have different priorities. Gathering information about purchases has an opportunity cost as well. That time could be spent on something else.

    71. Re:There's plenty of room. by joocemann · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between our national interest in benefit from investments in foreign/domestic persons, and the import of foreign persons that other countries had invested in.

      My main point is not so much to somehow lock foreign-nationals that the US has paid to educate within our borders; but rather to argue that tax dollars should be spent to educate the citizens who have paid them. I am perpetually aggravated by the exclusion of US Citizens from *publicly funded* universities, while non-citizens occupy seats.

    72. Re:There's plenty of room. by Gypsy270 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm American too. I work in IT, run Linux, MAC, and Windows and I have several friends that do too. There are plenty of smart people in the US who were born and raised here. I admit that the school system has slid a little, mostly thanks to the liberal agenda, but there are still plenty of smart people here that can hold their own against anyone else in the world. What's on 95% of the World's computers and who wrote it? Windows and an American!!! All I'm saying is that if you don't like this country why did you come HERE for an education in the first place? If you don't like it then GET OUT AND DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE BUM!!!

    73. Re:There's plenty of room. by synthespian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know what I think? By any standards, Americans have it too easy: houses are too big (compare them to any European), cars waste too much fuel, credit is too easy, etc.

      Think about it: anybody who's got to compete with you has to at least bilingual, be up-to-date with everything you know (that is, read your books, read your papers), spend shitloads of money doing it that, etc.

      I've heard US American presidents for decades preach about the free market. Well, there's free market and globalization for you - you get to rub elbows with Indians, etc. You don't like it? Tough it out.

      But what I really expect your government to do is just to trample on the WTO's rules of trade and put forward a protectionist program, that is: to really come across once again as the jingoist nation full of B.S. that you are, one in which the rules apply to everyone else (for instance, the rule of international law), but not to you.

      You guys have it easy. Stop complaining.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    74. Re:There's plenty of room. by synthespian · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? Is it really that bad nowadays? I can't believe it...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    75. Re:There's plenty of room. by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is that if you don't like this country why did you come HERE for an education in the first place? If you don't like it then GET OUT AND DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE BUM!!!

      What the hell...? Dude, I had no choice in being here. I was born in the US, and I've never had the opportunity to leave.

      I hope that the quoted bit was directed at foreigners studying over here and not at me.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    76. Re:There's plenty of room. by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the US Citizens had a hand to play in this recession as well as the US government.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    77. Re:There's plenty of room. by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      I hope that you are wrong. A protectionist agenda would send the U.S. into a depression that would make the Great Depression seem like a minor economic speedbump. We need the rest of the world more than they need us.

      I imagine that U.S. Presidents will continue to preach the virtues of the Free Market. After all, even in times of economic crisis we tend to do better than countries with some other formula for managing their economy.

      I certainly agree that Americans have no room for complaint.

    78. Re:There's plenty of room. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I haven't been to an Indian school, but I suspect that they don't engage in this: http://www.nea.org/home/ns/30045.htm

    79. Re:There's plenty of room. by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      So employers fill these slots with employees who will work longer and work cheaper in order to stay in the US.

      How about making H1B holders eligible for Diversity Immigrant Visa.
      Isn't it a win-win proposition?

      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    80. Re:There's plenty of room. by Gypsy270 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I was addressing the thankless foreigners who enter the country for a free education and bail before we have proper payback. I was not addressing you. Sorry for the misunderstanding. But the fact of the matter I was trying to make is that only the students are leaving, not the teachers. The US has the best teachers in the World and will continue to do so. We are the leaders in technology hands down. If you want technology made cheap you go to Japan. If you want technology made smarter you come to the US. Most of the technology used around the world originated here first. Again, sorry for the misunderstanding.

    81. Re:There's plenty of room. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If employers lay off a lot of high cost of living (HCOL) programmers in favor of offshore low cost of living (LCOL) programmers, they may find the HCOL programmers developing open source solutions and undercutting their product as consultants. Due to this concern, it may be they plan to transition slower to the offshore locations.

    82. Re:There's plenty of room. by steveg · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that any time somebody says "everyone knows" it's a red flag that whatever they're talking about just ain't so.

      Now parse that.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  7. Nice -- more of what we already knew by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages, offshoring and outsourcing services are all great ways for companies to increase their bottom lines. But when EVERYONE is doing it, these companies ultimately create poor and unemployed customers! This is not sustainable.

    People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

    It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability. (Reality check! In no part of the universe is growth a sustainable metric!!)

    1. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by sledge_hmmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your whole post just seems like a random rant not terribly relevant to the article.

      If anything what the article does say that a fifth of the Chinese and nearly half the Indians that left actually entered on temporary visas (such as H1-Bs).

      It's these people that help add value to the economy by developing technology, starting companies and driving innovation thus creating jobs. So they are a necessary part of the solution to increasing American competitiveness in the 21st century.

    2. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by hazem · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability.

      This kind of thinking is a systemic problem and not just in the job market.

      Consider the mortgage foreclosure issue. For a single bank making a foreclosure decision, it makes perfect sense to foreclose a bad loan, realize the loss, and then recover the value by selling the property. This is even okay to happen "regularly" as long as it's a relatively minor level of activity. But once you reach (as another posted pointed out) a "tipping point", this behavior that's good for an individual suddenly becomes extremely detrimental to everyone.

      This was magnified by an unwillingness by the banks to re-negotiate the raise in rates on adjustable rate loans. Again, on a case by case basis, it makes sense for the bank to "stick to their guns" and force the consumer to pay the higher rate. But doing this to too many people will cause a large number of them to foreclose. That just refers back to the previous paragraph.

      With too many homes in foreclosure, values of entire neighborhoods drop and people are stuck with homes that aren't worth what they owe. Many walk away leaving the banks with properties they can't sell in neighborhoods that are devalued.

      The short-term case of chasing the profit prevented the longer term view of seeing that what they were doing was destroying the market. And now, after so much damage, they're being forced to do the very things they should have been doing in the first place - negotiating rates to help keep homeowners in their homes.

    3. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by maxume · · Score: 1

      I thought they were only offshoring the productive jobs, if they are offshoring the service jobs, we are fucked!

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let me start by saying that your username is apropos.

      I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages, offshoring and outsourcing services are all great ways for companies to increase their bottom lines.

      First, there is nothing wrong with outsourcing. Hell, I outsource my lawncare to a neighborhood kid. You do know that outsourcing is substantively different than offshoring, right?

      But when EVERYONE is doing it, these companies ultimately create poor and unemployed customers! This is not sustainable.

      You're right it's not sustainable; eventually those unemployed people find jobs that are either more productive and valuable to society, or they find employment doing something else... at a price more in line with what the work is worth. There is no inherent reason an artificial restriction on labor (tight immigration policy) should be allowed to prop up wages... in the long run, this results in a smaller market for goods.

      In re: offshoring, I'm sure we completely disagree, but from a humanitarian perspective, it's far better to lift some people out of abject poverty in developing nations than it is to slightly increase someone's already-high standard of living in the US.

      People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

      Yes, we have a surplus of labor right now. And that's painful for some. But protectionism is not the answer. It lengthened and deepened the great depression, and it will do the same thing now. Those who do not study history are doomed to repeat it.

      It seems that everyone and every entity is seeming short, fast turn-around and ever-increasing bottom lines using "growth percentage" as a metric for success and viability. (Reality check! In no part of the universe is growth a sustainable metric!!)

      Except, perhaps, the universe as a whole. Joking aside, why should economic growth not be sustainable long-term? Seriously? It's not like it's constrained by physical goods or anything... it's an intellectual construct that doesn't have absolute limits. I fully agree that "short-termism" is a flawed way to assess economic vitality of a company, and country, or an economy. But I disagree that growth is not sustainable. Consider that every trade transaction, in theory, represents economic growth (economics is not zero-sum, in case you have no knowledge of economics).

      At any rate, protectionism is not the answer, now or ever. It only serves to reduce economic vitality... and this is especially so if other nations retaliate (which they surely would). If you had your way, we'd lose the benefit that all these immigrants, etc, would bring to our future economy. You want to talk about being motivated by short-term profits? You sir, with your talk of protectionism, are doing exactly that.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First they enter the U.S. and depress wages. Then they leave the depressed wages in their wake. Meanwhile, the U.S. has fewer "smart" people getting such degrees and training and will take some time before a bounce back can occur.

    6. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by erroneus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Oh good god. Pick an industry and grow it "forever" and see where it takes you. Real estate? Fast Food? Cell phones? Even securities? Every market can saturate. The saturation of the securities market is what led to the creation of these risky-mortgage based securities -- they needed a new market to grow in.

      And one thing I failed to mention that I wish I had (not that it adds much to the argument) is the still present trade deficit. We are buying more than we are selling. What we are selling is largely to ourselves in decreasing numbers. The poor are getting poorer.

      We do need protectionism. We need to protect our assets. We once had the strongest agricultural production and now we don't. We once had the strongest manufacturing and now we don't. We once has the strongest technology development and it is rather doubtful that we can wear that badge any longer. What do we have then? The most "rich people?" We do still have a high concentration of wealth but that concentration is confined to less than a percent of the population and a non-existent middle-class.

    7. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Fallingcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tragedy of the commons

      I've been posting that link quite a bit, because it has been very, very appropriate in so many threads lately, and I've found--much to my surprise--that many people (not you, I'm betting you already knew of it) don't properly appreciate it.

    8. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

      This was magnified by an unwillingness by the banks to re-negotiate the raise in rates on adjustable rate loans.

      Just a nit, but the stupidity is even worse than that!!!

      What "banks" did, was take a lot of "similar" mortgages (rate,maturity, etc.) and bundle them into a financial instrument. The mortgage itself is no longer something that can be negotiated, it is part of a larger financial formula and changing it requires *all* the share holders of the instrument to be informed and consent.

      Its just stupid, but it is also helpful. If a bank wants to foreclose on your house, you simply ask to see the paper work and note. More often than not, the mortgage was sold to a holding company and the foreclosing bank does not have the note and thus you buy yourself potentially months.

       

    9. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Protectionism is NOT the answer, that's just a way to make things worse. However, what WOULD help dramatically would be eliminating all corporate taxes. The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. If you eliminate corporate taxes (or at least drastically reduce them), you encourage growth and encourage companies to come from other countries into the US ("reverse" outsourcing).

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    10. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      If I only had mod points... Thank you, it is nice to see another intelligent being alive here.

    11. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by naoursla · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If profits were being driven down by competition that would be fine. The real problem is the wealth created by these improvements in labor allocation are going to a small percentage of the population. A large economy needs a lot of people creating and consuming. When wealth becomes too concentrated, you get a small number of people consuming and a large number creating. The large numbers creating quickly run out of things to create because the few with all of the money can't consume enough. That causes part of the economy to die (people dropping out of participation in the economy) and shrink.

    12. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh good god. Pick an industry and grow it "forever" and see where it takes you. Real estate? Fast Food? Cell phones? Even securities? Every market can saturate. The saturation of the securities market is what led to the creation of these risky-mortgage based securities -- they needed a new market to grow in.

      Why are you limiting the discussion to specific markets, first of all? Why not general economic activity? Saturation of capital in a market (like the securities market) can be bled off if other markets are more profitable... this is the basis of almost all investment. The securities problem of mortgage-based assets was not due to saturation, it was due to improper valuation of those securites, making them more attractive than other investment alternatives.

      Furthermore, saturation of supply in a market is simply a supply issue... this doesn't mean that the market can't continue to grow.

      And one thing I failed to mention that I wish I had (not that it adds much to the argument) is the still present trade deficit. We are buying more than we are selling. What we are selling is largely to ourselves in decreasing numbers. The poor are getting poorer.

      Agreed. And this is because it is too expensive to produce goods here, because labor is too expensive. More on this below.

      We do need protectionism. We need to protect our assets. We once had the strongest agricultural production and now we don't. We once had the strongest manufacturing and now we don't. We once has the strongest technology development and it is rather doubtful that we can wear that badge any longer. What do we have then? The most "rich people?" We do still have a high concentration of wealth but that concentration is confined to less than a percent of the population and a non-existent middle-class.

      Agricultural production -- we're still one of the strongest, if not the strongest, in the world. Agricultural products remain one of our biggest exports. Manufacturing -- this industry has died because labor is too expensive here. Technological development -- this is dependent on 'innovative spirit' and cheap labor, both of which are stimulated by immigration -- immigrants tend to be risk-takers, which innovators by nature also are.

      We do still have a high concentration of wealth but that concentration is confined to less than a percent of the population and a non-existent middle-class.

      Yes. But protectionism feeds into this. There is no middle class because there aren't good jobs. There aren't good jobs because labor is too expensive. Labor is too expensive because the cost of living is too high. The cost of living is too high because we've leveraged unsustainable resources (natural resources and credit, to be specific) to inflate the standard of living. Solution: Reduce the standard of living so US labor is competitive, either by attrition (which protectionism will cause) or via immigration (which will create a larger market for US goods).

      The problem with protectionism is that while it may maintain our standard of living as long as we have lots of natural resources and credit from other nations, it's not sustainable. We'll only be able to correct the trade imbalance if we all become poor (and thus globally competitive).

      If we open the immigration doors, we increase the availability of cheap labor, which benefits most of us. Sure, it'll be painful until we're able to develop competitive local manufacturing, and until the waves of immigrants are economically strong enough to function as a market for our goods... but the alternative is to slowly stagnate while the rest of the world passus us by. Protectionism left China in the dust for decade after decade... only a loosening of that protectionism allowed them to raise their standard of living. Let's not follow the same path.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    13. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by cjb658 · · Score: 0, Troll

      First they enter the U.S. and depress wages. Then they leave the depressed wages in their wake. Meanwhile, the U.S. has fewer "smart" people getting such degrees and training and will take some time before a bounce back can occur.

      Let's go over this again:
      1. Democrats create legislation that allows people to get loans for homes they can't afford ("Community Reinvestment Act")
      2. Congress & George Bush fail to prevent said loans from being approved.
      3. Some banks fail, ones that don't reduce the amount of money they lend.
      4. Businesses can't get loans and have less money to spend.
      5. Businesses lay off workers.
      6. Businesses' stock prices go down
      7. People with 401k's and stocks spend less money
      8. Recession occurs

    14. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Democrats create legislation that allows people to get loans for homes they can't afford ("Community Reinvestment Act")

      True, that was lame as all hell.

      But what about the other 99.8% of the problem?

    15. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by rossifer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um, the CRA is a red herring.

      The loans covered by CRA tended to have the same risk profile as other bank loans.
      "liar loans", "no income, no assets loans", etc. almost entirely came from institutions not covered by CRA.

      The rest of your list is not any better.

      You completely missed Christopher Cox's incompetent regulation of financial institutions at the SEC, Alan Greenspan's ill-advised attempt to keep spending up by keeping interest rates near zero for most of a decade, Bush begging Americans to "keep spending" after 9/11, and the real original seed of the current disaster, which was a series of moves to deregulate banks that occurred during Bush I and Clinton leading to the creation of credit default swaps, the securitization of debt, and all sorts of other really bad ideas.

      But it was nice of you to try to make Bush look a little less incompetent. The worst president in history still needs a kind word every once in a while.

    16. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just have to wonder how much more of this erosion of the U.S. the U.S. is willing to accept and permit? H1-Bs and lowering of wages,

      US real total compensation per hour has doubled since 1970. Real hourly earnings aren't up much over that time, but that is because our additional compensation is going into 401k plans, health insurance, and more paid sick time. It is going there because tax policy makes it preferable for your employer to pay that compensation rather than paying you wages, having your wages taxed, and then you pay for them.

      Note that real disposable income actually rose the last four months.

      People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

      Protectionism is a false promise, it supports unsustainable and inefficient businesses at the expense of consumers. I work for a US company in an industry that earns 1/3 of its revenue (that's $10 billion dollars) in exports. So go ahead, put me out of a job!

    17. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Protectionism is NOT the answer, that's just a way to make things worse. [Citation Needed]

      However, what WOULD help dramatically would be eliminating all corporate taxes. [Citation Needed]

      The US has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the world. [Citation Needed]

      If you eliminate corporate taxes (or at least drastically reduce them), you encourage growth and encourage companies to come from other countries into the US ("reverse" outsourcing). [Citation Needed]

      ----------

      Any questions?

      --
    18. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh good god. Pick an industry and grow it "forever" and see where it takes you. Real estate? Fast Food? Cell phones? Even securities? Every market can saturate.

      I can prove you wrong with one word:

      Porno.

    19. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And one thing I failed to mention that I wish I had (not that it adds much to the argument) is the still present trade deficit. We are buying more than we are selling. What we are selling is largely to ourselves in decreasing numbers.

      Actually exports have been rising (until 2009) as well as imports: see here. And keep in mind that those $3 trillion in imports are still pretty small compared with the $13 trillion domestic, non-imported US economy.

      On the other hand, a global trade war would risk the $1.8 trillion in US exports and all of their respective jobs (my industry makes 1/3 of its revenue from exports), so let's not mess around with that! Plus it would raise prices on basic consumer goods, which would affect the poor the worst!

    20. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by bnenning · · Score: 1

      The short-term case of chasing the profit prevented the longer term view of seeing that what they were doing was destroying the market.

      When the "market" consists of houses at ludicrously inflated prices, it should be destroyed. Ideally in a gentler manner than what we've experienced, but there's no reason why we should be compelled to help irresponsible borrowers (yes, the lenders were idiots too) stay in houses they could never legitimately afford, while insuring that responsible people remain priced out.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    21. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Do a quick google on corporate taxes by country or US corporate taxes. You'll find dozens of sources.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    22. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Many walk away leaving the banks with properties they can't sell in neighborhoods that are devalued.

      And right there is the flaw which is replicated throughout the US economy. You have a culture where people greedily partake of the upside, and expect to be able to just walk away from the downside, in the case of CEOs, often with a golden parachute.

    23. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Labor is too expensive because the cost of living is too high. The cost of living is too high because we've leveraged unsustainable resources (natural resources and credit, to be specific) to inflate the standard of living. Solution: Reduce the standard of living so US labor is competitive

      You have no idea what you're talking about. The cost of living has nothing to do with the standard of living. In fact, to compare the cost of living of two different places, you compare how much it costs to live equivalently in them. Take your $50,000 / year job, live in Argentina, and you'll be living like someone who earns $200,000 in the US. Large house, pool, maids...the only problem is that it's pretty tough to find a job in Argentina that pays $50,000.

      You can find the same situation without leaving the US, to a lesser extent. See how much it costs you to rent a house in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Then travel up to New York and see the crappy apartment you'll be able to afford for the same cost. Same amount of money, way lower standard of living. New York's cost of living is higher than that of Rock Hill.

    24. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1-Bs and lowering of wages

      Will you go ahead and quit it already? Are you living in the same reality as I am? I am an H1B and I am paid the exact same amount as an American worker at my level (in fact, because of good performance reviews, I am paid more).

      Stop perpetuating this lie!

    25. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, who runs companies? All too many times, NOT people with company loyalty. Companies are run for the benefit of investors, who only care about how a company does as long as they have an investment in it, which ends as soon as the creep up stops.

      When you measure success more in terms of flux than staying power, that's a recipe for collapse.

      In investor terms, it's better to have stop go from $10 to $100 and back repeatedly than stay at $50 Forget that this probably involves massive repeated layoffs, sabotage by the disgruntled, a work ethic fitting employees who have come to hate their company, loss of contracts when you periodically lack the staff to support them etc. Companies run for the benefit of investors aren't run for their OWN sake, but for what is essentially a side effect. The stock market is putting the cart before the horse in terms of the company's success, so that the success of an outside party can be secured.

      Mere protectionism won't do enough, we HAVE to establish the survival of companies as being a higher priority than playing with their figures. It we had an equivalent HUGE lottery that allowed the same stakes without endangering a vital part of the economy it would be a big help. That said, we NEED before we have any overseas dealings, to be self sufficient. What would we do if a REAL oil shortage stopped plane / boat traffic in and out? It's a matter of national security to be ABLE to be self sufficient. I don't know that we're there.

    26. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      What "banks" did, was take a lot of "similar" mortgages (rate,maturity, etc.) and bundle them into a financial instrument. The mortgage itself is no longer something that can be negotiated, it is part of a larger financial formula and changing it requires *all* the share holders of the instrument to be informed and consent.

      It's not nearly as clear-cut as you put it. The loan servicers normally have some latitude in modifying terms on loans where default is reasonably imminent, as a form of loss mitigation. Skim this link for a brief explanation of this toward the beginning.

      In any case, even if you assume a modification that the servicer isn't ordinarily allowed to do, it doesn't follow that all shareholders must consent to that modification. It really depends on how the instrument is structured and managed. A really simple example: if the investment is structured as a holding corporation for the assets, approval for modifications would be subject to the bylaws of the corporation. Modifications could be at the discretion of the management of the corporation; they could require approval from the board; or they could require shareholder vote. There's no general answer.

    27. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by emaname · · Score: 1

      I agree. This never impressed me as a viable, long term strategy.

      Another question comes to mind for me, however. Since there are some companies pushing for more H-1B visas, who financed this study.

      --
      An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
    28. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by cjsm · · Score: 1

      US real total compensation per hour [blogspot.com] has doubled since 1970. Real hourly earnings [econbrowser.com] aren't up much over that time, but that is because our additional compensation is going into 401k plans, health insurance, and more paid sick time. It is going there because tax policy makes it preferable for your employer to pay that compensation rather than paying you wages, having your wages taxed, and then you pay for them.

      Sure, that's why it takes two people working instead of one, like it did in 1970, to keep an average household above water.

      The Heritage foundation site makes claims about their calculations, but provides no links to show in any detail in the least what those calculations are. All references reference the opposing claim, except for one, and that one doesn't really explain anything.

      The Heritage Foundation statements reminds me of the Republicans who say on the Sunday talk shows that the amount the rich are paying in taxes has actually gone up, ignoring that their cut of the national income has doubled.

      Basically what makes the Heritage Foundation claim invalid is that, according to the notes on one of the charts, it includes everyone but the proprietors. Well, everyone but the proprietors would usually include the CEO, since he's an employee, and all of the Wall Street traders who make multi-million dollar bonuses every year.

      Needless to say, such statistics which include the wealthy tell you nothing how people that make under $100,000 a year are doing. This is just more right wing disinformation.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    29. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by timeOday · · Score: 1

      US real total compensation per hour has doubled since 1970.

      So says the American Heritage Foundation (so this is in line with their usual tone), yet it doesn't even pass the laugh test. It would mean my real income is about twice that of my father at the same age. As it happens my position is extremely similar to his 30 years ago, both working at govt. labs. Except he got there with a bachelor's degree and I have a PhD, so I was in school (not earning a real income) much longer. He had the same number of kids, same number of cars, and a bigger house on a much bigger lot. He had a pension (which is now a godsend since his 401k nosedived shortly after his retirement).

      The idea that real income has doubled since then is ludicrous.

    30. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by twostix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What a joke that first link is. Truly. Some vague hand waving, a distortion of numbers and a couple of meaningless graphs can convince some people of anything. It (intentionally I'll assume given the source) also misses the obvious, if it's going to include "benefits" it'd better include the enormously inflated cost of health care! Oh it doesn't? Then it's less than meaningless, it's misleading.

      In 1970 my father, a lowly mechanic purchased a nice house (on 70% of his wage), supported a wife and raised three children in a solid middle class household.

      39 years later his son, a white collar computer programmer raising three children and supporting a wife can't afford to buy a house on 100% of his wage in ANY POPULATION CENTRE. Functionally lower-middle class, one car not two, not to mention working twice as many hours and getting half the benefits!

      And yet ivory tower pseudo-intellectuals such as yourself will assume to lecture to us with the help of awful graphs and twisted and distorted 'truths' that we work less for more than people did thirty years ago.

      What a joke.

      And why would tariffs put you out of a job? Tariffs affect imports not exports.

      And holy shit of course 'real disposable income' increased in the last four months, half a million people are losing their jobs a month, people aren't buying things so prices on luxuries MUST come down. It's called a recession! You seem to have a flimsy grasp on real economics. Or an agenda to drive. Gee I wonder which.

      Ideological fanatics such as yourself, who don't have a firm hand on reality, just the dogma in your minds are selling your own countries out for no reason what so ever. And China and India and other developing countries will *happily* allow that to happen, then see if they're so ready to be so open with their borders when they finally hold the upper hand.

      You people are little more than an updated version of the 20th centuries Useful Idiots. How the Chinese must laugh at the west.

    31. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by jcr · · Score: 1

      We do need protectionism.

      Oh, for crying out loud. "Protection"ism is nothing more than treating customers as property. If someone in a foreign country can sell me a product or service for a better price than someone in my own country, too bad for the incompetent competitor. Protectionism robs consumers, protects bad management, and makes us all poorer.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    32. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The cost of living has nothing to do with the standard of living.

      That's incorrect. Reduce the standard of living, and you reduce the cost of living.

      As you point out, income potential in local economies also affects cost of living. Try this one out for size, before you go on about me not knowing what I'm talking about: Instead of monetary cost, compare cost of living by labor cost. My skills earn me $x a year in Bumbletwit Arkansas, $3x a year in Centerville NJ, and $4x a year in Manhattan. Cost of living, normalized for income, is much more constant in the US than you make out.

      You can find the same situation without leaving the US, to a lesser extent. See how much it costs you to rent a house in Rock Hill, South Carolina. Then travel up to New York and see the crappy apartment you'll be able to afford for the same cost. Same amount of money, way lower standard of living. New York's cost of living is higher than that of Rock Hill.

      We're talking about labor here, so costs of living should be calculated in terms of labor units, not monetary equivalents. And as far as standard of living, there are a lot of intangibles (and tangibles) that make the standard of living in NY higher than SC. Better water... better mass transit... better access to cultural phenomena... better access to varied cuisines, foods, etc... better access to medical care... I could keep going, but what's the point?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    33. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, that's why it takes two people working instead of one, like it did in 1970, to keep an average household above water.

      Not really. Back in 1970, most families that had a car at all only had one, we generally lived in much smaller houses, etc, etc. People want more stuff.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    34. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your economic model relies upon infinite population growth?

      Once you've driven labor costs down to near zero, covered all your farmland with highrise apartments, and expanded your domestic market to the max, what do you do after that?

    35. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1

      People constantly ask "so protectionism is the answer?" Right now, yes it is!

      You may wish to look up Messrs Smoot and Hawley, two honorable congressmen that shared your opinion.

      The two gentlemen are widely credited for being significantly responsible in triggering the depression of the 30s,l which brought so much misery and economic chaos over the US and the world.

      It's also somewhat hypocritical that the developed world yells (and partially strong arms) for low tariffs in developing world and yells bloody murder and demands protection if the shit hits the fan.

      Mind you, I'm not accusing the US of being the sole reponsible here. Monsieur Sarkozy, who was thankfully called to reason by the rest of his EU peers, seems to be on an equally bad trip.

      In other words: Protectionism is probably the absolute worst that could happen to the global eceonomy while it's completely down on it's knees and history pretty much proves that.

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

    36. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is that the US has been doing that to latin america countries for decades and yet, when some elected government has the audacity to complain about the nasty effect that the US has on it's domestic economy and therefore socially and starts talking about protectionism, the US complains to the high heavens about how bad they are and the lack of freedom those measures bring. And by complaining I'm talking about bringing in aircraft carriers, regiments of marines and CIA "advisors" who are somehow found in the middle of military coups and political assassinations.

    37. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by iosq · · Score: 1

      Due to the cost of labour - even with reduced/eliminated corporate taxes - it is unlikely any major manufacturers would look to the U.S as a viable option. However, that is not to say it would not help save existing production/factories. What corporate tax cuts would certainly help is job security. Without payroll tax, employees are suddenly much, much less expensive to keep. This is far more effective then bailouts, as it means employees are no longer viewed as such great liabilities whereas bailouts simply don't allow the companies to learn from their mistakes; subsidizing them will only reinforce poor business models, as will protectionism.

    38. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      > Agricultural production -- we're still one of the strongest, if not the strongest, in the world.

      Oh please. US agriculture has been receiving aids for decades. http://www.card.iastate.edu/iowa_ag_review/summer_04/article3.aspx

    39. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      I bought the smallest place I could find that wasn't in a trailer park. It's still 150% of my yearly income.
      In Denver.
      Before taxes.

      Bureaucracy is driving us into the poorhouse.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    40. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      we have to prep ourselves for "two dollar stores" .....

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    41. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by DwySteve · · Score: 1

      What a joke that first link is. Truly. Some vague hand waving, a distortion of numbers and a couple of meaningless graphs can convince some people of anything.

      Citation needed? Honestly, economics is numbers - and yes, numbers based on assumptions. He produced numbers and you vaguely attack the assumptions?

      It (intentionally I'll assume given the source) also misses the obvious, if it's going to include "benefits" it'd better include the enormously inflated cost of health care! Oh it doesn't? Then it's less than meaningless, it's misleading.

      I don't understand what you're getting at - health care is explicitly mentioned in the article. True, health care may cost more than it should, but do you have any proof that an inflation of health care costs accounts for all of the increase in benefits? And that the quality of care hasn't improved? Go ahead, show me the studies that show we're getting much less for our dollar than we did before. Show me how people are dying earlier and there are fewer effective treatments available than in 1970. A cursory examination shows that there are more drugs and more effective drugs available, less invasive surgeries, more types of surgeries available and that people are living longer. Yes, there are some people who have no insurance at all but that's not the point of this - that's a social issue not an economic one. Please don't tell me that health care is the same as in 1970, and DON'T tell me that even if it's better it shouldn't cost more.

      In 1970 my father, a lowly mechanic purchased a nice house (on 70% of his wage), supported a wife and raised three children in a solid middle class household.

      Look, I've said it once I'll say it again - use some damn numbers. What did you dad make? What did the house cost? How many square foot? How much did it cost for utilities? Who did your dad work for? What was his retirement plan? How much was his 401K match? There is honestly no comparison when all you provide are vague adjectives.

      39 years later his son, a white collar computer programmer raising three children and supporting a wife can't afford to buy a house on 100% of his wage in ANY POPULATION CENTRE.

      Sure you can. If you want the same house your dad got I'm sure you can afford it. Same size probably, right in the middle of a 'population center'. It's downtown in the ghetto. Houses there are cheap and I'm sure it's not more than you had when you were growing up.
      But that's not what you want. You want a big house - a NEW house. Not in the ghetto. In a subdivision. With a gate and a pool and some nice illegal immigrant to come and mow your lawn. Hell that's where I live. Yes, it's expensive - I wish it weren't. But I don't pretend that it's the house my parents raised three children in - the one that is barely big enough to function as a garage for two cars (its current job). I have it a lot better than my parents and yes - it costs a bit more.

      Functionally lower-middle class, one car not two, not to mention working twice as many hours and getting half the benefits!

      Once again man, citation needed. I for one don't believe that you have it worse than your parents. I just can't see any way. What do you have? Cable? Internet? How many computers? How many TVs? DVD player? New car or used? How many bedrooms? What do you eat? Fresh vegetables? Do you buy 'organic' produce?
      Christ I can hardly count the ways that we have it better and we dont' even think about it. Do we deserve a new car and a big house? Probably not. Can a lot of us afford it? Yes! Can a lot of us BARELY afford it and complain about how much our life sucks when we saddle ourselves with debt (in a way our parents never would have)? YES! Our lives have gotten better, but our sense of entitlement has grown too large.

      --
      http://angryee.blogspot.com
    42. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by brizzadizza · · Score: 1

      I agree with most of your post. Squealer up there has no problem reminding us how bad the farm was before now, and ample "facts and figures" to prove it. Orwell was right about the future, just wrong about under which philosophy it would be brought about.

      By the way, home prices in Detroit are selling for $7500, maybe you could telecommute?

    43. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Manufacturing in the US is dead due to American's thinking that low-skill manufacturing should pay as well as a job requiring an advanced degree. However, corporate headquarters would be more likely to be based out of the US for the tax advantages if we had no corporate taxes.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    44. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Xoron101 · · Score: 1
    45. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by The_R_Meister · · Score: 1

      The loans covered by CRA tended to have the same risk profile as other bank loans.

      True, but also a red herring. If other bank loans were also influenced by the CRA to give out the same low-quality loans, the CRA is still at fault. It's quite possible that the CRA triggered the stampede by showing what was possible (and profitable ... for a time ...) and is thus still quite culpable without being directly responsible for the results.

      But it was nice of you to try to make Bush look a little less incompetent.

      Notice that even your list does that ... Bush I and Clinton both figure into that list, Bush II didn't have the wisdom/competence to turn the stampede, but it's arguable whether any president would have. Hopefully I'm proven wrong, but Obama so far seems to be encouraging it rather than turning it or just not noticing it.

      The worst president in history still needs a kind word every once in a while.

      I have a feeling you made up your mind about that one before deciding that the CRA was a red herring, and that there may be a causal relationship in there somewhere as well ... I'm not gonna argue that Bush II's domestic policy was a financial disaster (for the deficits caused by someone who shoulda known better, not as the final cause of the current global financial meltdown, although those deficits did rob the States of some potential cushioning and paved the way for the even worse than the Bush deficits bailouts). I'm far enough off topic already; I won't get into his foreign policy ...

    46. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad analogy.

                The neighborhoods are devaluing because they were way overinflated by the bubble, not because of the number of foreclosures. If foreclosures were the issue, that issue would be resolved once the foreclosed properties were sold off and then property values could pop right back up.

                The choice of foreclosure is never the aim of anyone seeking profit. Foreclosure is the search to be made whole once the banks counterparty in the contract defaulted. The bank will only, at best, received up to the amount they loaned out plus whatever interest and fees they are owed.

                Want a real analogy. What are the bigger consequences of renegotiating a mortgage contract. Is it fair to those whose contracts were not renegotiated? What will they do once they learn the bank is open to renegotiating? Will they stop paying in hopes of getting a better deal or even perhaps getting principle forgiven (the same as getting free money)? Why would anyone pay attention to the contacts they sign if they can look forward to having the contract renegotiated if they have any problem? What about the investors in bonds based upon these loans? Many of which are pension funds, other retirement funds, education funds, etc. Should you have no growth in the money set aside for your retirement/education/etc just to help a property owner whom bought more than they could afford? Even worse, should principle be forgiven you effectively loose money. Why should anyone invest in mortgage backed bonds if they can expect to have their expected income reduced or even worse have their investment given away? What would mortgage rates have to be to attract bond investors if they have to plan for interest rate resets or principle forgiveness? Why bother having a collateralize loan (effectively what a mortgage is) at all if terms can be renegotiated? Ever wonder why mortgages usually average about 6% while personal loans were are more like 15%-30% and at a much lower amount? That is because they have collateral backing them up, so if you don't pay the lender could repossess and sell to recover their losses.

    47. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no fan of protectionism however I believe your post to be inaccurate.

                Protectionism is not what left China, previously, in the dust. It was the not invented here syndrome, the strangulation of the individual, and the cultural proclivity towards maintaining the status quo.

                China had both gunpowder and a long distance sea voyage (sailed all the way to Europe) long before Europe did. They could have been the ones whom conquered the Americas and most of the world. (Note, this is not a statement on the morality of what happened just the result.) Instead they pulled back, scuttled those ships, gunpowder got relegated to fireworks, and the government spent its energy making sure to keep its people in their place (when not warding off the occasional barbarian hoard). Eventually some of those barbarians, of the European persuasion, with some of their own technology and improved versions of Chinese ones grew powerful enough to dominate them for a century.

                Japan didn't have the level of difficulty. When they realized how outdated their society had become in comparison to the west, they modernized in a generation, by importing technology and customs from the outside, and became powerful enough to take on the powers of the day. It was extreme isolationism that doomed the Chinese (previously) not protectionism.

                As for protectionism it was the standard of the day throughout the period during which the west underwent the industrial revolution. Every country strove to protect their own industries at the expense of foreign imports. It is how we grew our own industrial base. Had we had a free market, British industry would have crushed our own industry long before it could establish itself. The "asian tigers" (Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, etc) basically industrialized and modernized on protectionism. Toyoda is now the world leader in car making because Japan gave them a protected market which served as their base when they were starting out.

                This is not to serve as an endorsement of protectionism (I actually favor free markets), however we should try and see things how they actually were and not what fits ideologically. Also keep in mind that a real free market must flow in both directions and that to efficiently compete in such a market, in none land-locked industries (such as resource mining, etc), you pretty much have to reach a common bottom in standard of living, regulations, etc. Also what is good about a free market is not necessarily good for the country. For example how does the loss of an industrial base affect a country's ability to defend itself.

    48. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by rossifer · · Score: 1

      I think you misunderstood my posting. I don't blame Bush II for the economic disaster. He bears some of the responsibility for it, sure, but there's blame to go around for a disaster this big. Many other people contributed to the problem over the last 15-20 years to try to "solve" several necessary down cycles and thereby create a world-wide economic collapse, and Bush II only had eight years of watching the snowball grow into the avalanche that can be laid at his feet. Just about the only person who can't be blamed for the disaster is Obama. So far. We'll see if his cautious manipulations of the banks can stabilize things. If not, his name will be added to the list and he'll lose in 2012.

      My posting was simply to state two things: that the CRA had absolutely nothing to do with bad loans and most certainly had nothing to do with what's going on now and that your mental contortions to avoid putting any responsibility on Bush II were nonsense.

      The CRA didn't tell banks to loan to people without incomes. It said to loan to people in bad neighborhoods using the same loan criteria about the individual as you do in good neighborhoods. The idea that there might be money made from high-interest loans to bad risks did not come from the CRA either. Also, the idea that it wasn't necessary to check for income or assets only appeared once the housing market was rising fast enough that all loans were always above water. Again, nothing to do with the CRA. Finally, the idea that mortgages could be bought and sold in bundles that supposedly reduced the risk of individual defaults was a regulatory failure and had nothing to do with the CRA.

      Basically, anyone telling you that the CRA had the smallest thing to do with our current economic problems is completely and utterly full of shit. They're wanting to put blame on Democrats for something, and the CRA 1) looks like sub-prime mortgages and 2) was pushed by Democrats. Look deeper at the CRA and it's simply forcing good business practices onto elitist snobs (most of whom were Democrats) who didn't want to loan money to the lower-classes.

      Yes, Bush II will go down in history as the worst president ever. No, he's not the only person to blame for the disaster. He is a very visible person to blame, however, and deserves pretty much all of the barbs thrown his way. IMHO, anyway :)

    49. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by illtud · · Score: 1

      Joking aside, why should economic growth not be sustainable long-term? Seriously? It's not like it's constrained by physical goods or anything...

      As long as the growth is based on sustainable resources, no problem. Unfortunately, most of econonmic growth is heavily oil-dependent, and dependent on other non-renewable resources. Agriculture (fertilizers, not just energy), Tech (it ain't all silicon), Construction (yeah, we've loads of ore, but not limitless) - they're all non-sustainable, so in the long term, we can't sustain the economic growth based on consumersism that we're used to.

    50. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 1

      if it's going to include "benefits" it'd better include the enormously inflated cost of health care! Oh it doesn't?

      Health care paid by employers does count under total compensation. If you prefer to gather the statistics yourself and plot them, see the "Employer Costs for Employee Compensation" report, produced quarterly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

      As of September, 2008, benefits (including health insurance) were 30.3% of worker total compensation, meaning if you had to pay your own 401K, health care, etc. you would see your pre-tax wages rise by 30%.

      The leading elements of total compensation are all around 7% to 8% each, include legally required ("employer side" of FICA), insurance, health care, and paid leave. Lesser elements include retirement & savings and supplemental pay.

      By the way, you should know that in 1970, FICA taxes (totaling both the "employer" and "employee" side) were 9.6% in 1970, and 15.3% today, so we've lost 5.7% of total compensation (below the FICA max) to the government since then.

      And why would tariffs put you out of a job? Tariffs affect imports not exports.

      The history of global trade is that if one country raises its tariffs, other countries tend to "retaliate".

      That said, my industry also depends on a lot of imported specialized technical equipment (from Canada, Mexico, France, and Japan off the top of my head), so US tariff rises would increase our costs at least in the short run if not the long run as well.

      39 years later his son, a white collar computer programmer raising three children and supporting a wife can't afford to buy a house on 100% of his wage in ANY POPULATION CENTRE

      The question you should ask is "why?" Why are houses so large now? We know that inflation adjusted price of housing per square foot has been dropping until about the peak of the housing bubble. Is the size of houses just demand-driven, does it reflect a generally richer population, is it due to rises in the minimum wage, or is it due to land use zoning regulations? I'm not sure, but I'd like to see an actual analysis.

      On the other hand, housing prices are now down 10-30% post-bubble in most places, with house rent even cheaper.

      You are correct that housing and health care costs as a percent of income are higher now then 40 years ago, of course both housing stock and health care is much improved since then. And both are very highly regulated - housing by zoning laws and building codes, with demand driven up till recently by the existance of the government-sponsored enterprises of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Health insurance has a different set of rapidly expanding regulations that are different in every state, demand driven by government provided Medicare and Medicaid, defensive medicine due to nearly unlimited malpractice liability, and IT expenses to comply with Federal medical privacy laws. There also is the fact that it is still difficult for foreign doctors to legally immigrate into the US and set up practice, and we now pay our doctors twice as much as the OECD average.

      None of this is related to trade though, with the exception of cheaper wood products coming in from Canada due to NAFTA, which was probably part of the decrease in housing costs per square foot built.

    51. Re:Nice -- more of what we already knew by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The idea that real income has doubled since then is ludicrous.

      Real income is adjusted by inflation. You have pointed out the important fact that the relative price level of housing (especially right before the bubble) has risen much faster than other relative costs. The real price of food and clothes, for example, are much lower now than in 1970. The real price of medical care is higher, but you can't really compare health care in 1970 and 2008, the technological differences are tremendous. Housing prices per square foot decreased until the top of the housing bubble, now they are back down to pre-1970 levels. But our houses are twice as large now, despite the fact that we have fewer kids. I remember my childhood friends in the 1970 sleeping two to a room, such things are almost unheard of in middle-class families today. Automobile costs are also up due to their size increase combined with regulatory costs to meet crash, CAFE, and emission requirements.

      I should also point out that the average tax rate for the dual-working families has risen by about 25 percent between 1970 and today, because of increases in FICA and second earners moving families up in tax brackets.

  8. Re:Let them go by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time we make some room for real US citizens.

    Presumably, most of those people originally wanted to become "real" (is there any other kind?) US citizens as well, but realized they have to jump through too many hoops for it to be worth it.

    (or do you mean that "real US citizen" is a White Protestant guy with Anglo-Saxon lineage?)

    Of course, you can have those guys working in engineering, physics or biotech fields in US - preferably as citizens - or you can have them working on thermonuclear warheads, delivery systems, and biological weapons in China or Russia. Your pick.

  9. Tipping point by bindo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the end ....

    my feeling, in 30 years this moment will be viewed as the tipping point, the moment in which america stopped being the siphon of the worlds best minds.

    For the first time in history the melting pot hasn't managed to retain the best.
    Those people will bring a BIG BOOST in their respoective countries ruling intellighentia.

    lots of sour grapes here, but have no one else to blame ....

    1. Re:Tipping point by SIR_Taco · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, a melting pot would retain the heaviest, which the US has quite well

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    2. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people will bring a BIG BOOST in their respoective countries ruling intellighentia.

      Their intelligentsia might know how to enable the spell checker. We cannot blame the immigrants for wanting to leave the language terrorists behind.

    3. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about you, but I'm not seeing these folks that typically come over on things like H1-B's to be the "world's best minds."

      Perhaps our experiences are different, biases, etc. As of right now, I'm seeing people go back home with degrees that are as worthless as the paper they're printed on, and we're calling this a culling of smart talent from the US. Sheesh.

      Bias all around it seems.

    4. Re:Tipping point by cjb658 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, at least we still have the most guns.

    5. Re:Tipping point by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, this has probably not so much to do with the US itself, and more with the countries many of you immigrants come from.

      I'm Swedish, and for various reasons a disproportionate number of Swedes tend to move abroad; not just academics and other highly skilled people, but "ordinary" people too. There is very little debate about it, and no screaming about "brain drain". The reason is that the vast majority eventually return. It may take three, or five, or ten years, but most come back and bringing with them more skills and experience, making it a net win for the country.

      Similarly, as large countries like China and India become places where a middle-class life is attainable and normal, so will more people return home eventually where they would have settled abroad permanently before. It's not that the US has become less attractive, but that people's own home countries have become more so.

      The US can and should adapt to this in two ways: first, recognize that a temporary immigrant is still valuable for the country even if they leave after some years. Second, encourage more of their own citizens to likewise move abroad for some period in order to build their skills and benefit in the same way that other countries do. While Swedes are disproportionately likely to live abroad, US citizens seem anecdotally disproportionately unlikely to do so. You seem to have a whole slew of arbitrary barriers, like the double income taxation when living abroad, that conspire to keep normal people from relocating for a few years.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    6. Re:Tipping point by DiegoBravo · · Score: 1

      Yeah! good point. That's why all the world (maybe except FOX viewers) see the US attempts to avoid other countries developing nukes as a bully and unmoral action (despite the Muslims-are-evil song)... no, nukes are not good by any measure, but before asking any country to stop nuclear programmees, the asker should destroy or at least lower the potential of their own weapons.

    7. Re:Tipping point by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Well, at least we still have the most guns.

      and prisons. and folks IN prison. I think it goes hand in hand. so to speak.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, a melting pot would retain the heaviest, which the US has quite well"

      That's the most intelligent thing I've heard so far in this article.

      Just my two cents, but I don't think that losing these foreigners will be of any consequence to the brilliance, industriousness, and creativeness of the denizens of the US. Besides, we gain thousands per day from Mexico, what are you complaining about?

    9. Re:Tipping point by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      The US: the cheese fondue pot of the world?

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    10. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I want to start looting NOW.

    11. Re:Tipping point by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      No, a melting pot would retain the heaviest, which the US has quite well

      No, the densest.

    12. Re:Tipping point by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it could just be a made-up story on a slow news day, which is usually what these "brain drain" stories are. They take 6 months worth of statistics, and extend it out 50 years from now to come up with these "scary" conclusions.

      In any case, I doubt the hyperbole is called for, eh? It's the end of the world as we know it, and I feel fine.

    13. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would not be so sure about qualifying the US as a "melting pot", more than 3/4 of the people are white. Just because there are some minorities sprinkled here and there doesn't mean it is an open society.

    14. Re:Tipping point by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

      No, a melting pot would retain the heaviest, which the US has quite well

      I have to disagree with your argument. That should be most dense, not heaviest... Oh never mind. We also do that well.

      --
      Think global, act loco
    15. Re:Tipping point by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      So you believe that making gun ownership illegal will result in fewer people in prison, and fewer prisons?

      Hmm. I don't quite see your reasoning.

      Or are you simply trying to tie gun ownership to an unrelated tautology to try and link gun ownership with something unsavory?

      Just curious.

    16. Re:Tipping point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think it happened a few years ago when bush started fingerprinting everyone. coming to the usa used to be a pleasure. these days its a nasty, horrible experience where you are treated like a criminal at immigration and an like an ATM on the street.

      add the guns, inaccessibility to any social safety net, insurance, foreign policy, social attitudes, rush limbaugh, MPAA, RIAA, PATRIOT, no-fly-lists... quite frankly is it really any surprise that those with options are voting with their feet?

      and yes i speak from experience.
      MSc S/W Eng H1B 1993-1996.

      canada meanwhile continues to attract bright engineers. wonder why. and i speak from experience there too.

      dont get me wrong the USA still has a place in the heart of people all around the world. since 2000 we have looked at it with heavy hearts like one would a dear relative who had developed a violent smack habit. why do you think so many citizens of the world were glad to see the back of bush?

    17. Re:Tipping point by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      ...a disproportionate number of Swedes tend to move abroad; not just academics and other highly skilled people, but "ordinary" people too. There is very little debate about it, and no screaming about "brain drain". The reason is that the vast majority eventually return. It may take three, or five, or ten years, but most come back and bringing with them more skills and experience, making it a net win for the country...

      Here here, this is the way to really raise the standard of living for the world. Many have thought that they would have to take a forced approach by simultaneously lowering many peoples standard of living in "rich" countries as well as raise it in the countries were it is the lowest. But this is a simpler and much more natural solution. As people churn around the planet we all benefit from a normalization of standard of living.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
  10. Re:Let them go by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    You can't make more Foreigner, AND THEY ARE TOTALLY SPECIAL!

    You're as cold as ice if you don't think so! Man, these head games you are playing really make me hot blooded...

    Fortunately, they are still alive, well, touring, and rocking, so we don't need to make more.

  11. This is good news, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American jobs should be going to AMERICANS, not foreigners.

    1. Re:This is good news, folks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

      American jobs should be going to AMERICANS, not foreigners.

      You miss the point. Those people wanted to become Americans. Now they do not want to, anymore. Wonder why is that?

    2. Re:This is good news, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please present a logical argument for why an American is more entitled to a job in America than any other applicant.

    3. Re:This is good news, folks! by Technician · · Score: 0

      American jobs should be going to AMERICANS, not foreigners.

      What it means is that American jobs are going away. Follow the money. With the new administration and redistribution of wealth, the tax and fees on evil corporations simply means they expand in profitable markets and shrink in places expensive to do business. In summary, flipping burgers will be the American jobs. Manufacturing & R & D in aerospace, robotics, transportation, semiconductors, etc are all moving overseas. Intel is closing Fab 20 in the US. They are outsourcing the manufacture of the Atom processor. Care to guess why?

      As long as we have a socialist president who taxes the health care of the "rich" the industry "who need to pay their fair share" and other stupid job exporting burdens, then all that will be left is the service industry of government run health care, fast food, and transportation repair industries. High tech well paying engineering and manufacturing is shutting down in the US.

      Let me know where you find a good paying job at Mc Dee's or wally mart with full bennifits and a retirement package.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:This is good news, folks! by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      Scandinavia?

      Full healthcare, full dental care, retirement, just for working at a McD's.

      Welcome to Socialism.

    5. Re:This is good news, folks! by shanen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Gee, you'd think those slimy foreigners could love us for something besides our money, eh? Damn those socialists, and give my regards to your wife. Maybe she loved you for something besides your money, eh? We can always hope.

      Yes, that's an insult, but I can't yet decide how stupid you are. Would you be worth having as a /. foe?

      Just in case you aren't an idiot, I'm curious why you are so desperate for money? I currently earn about three times my expenses, and I've become rather spendthrift these years. I really can't imagine what I'd do with more money, and I don't think I would work any harder or better if I was making somewhat more or less money. Now when you get up to the level around $1 million/year, it just seems ridiculous to me. I actually think most people would find that downright demotivating and just quit working.

      Or maybe the key factor ("problem" from your perspective?) is that I enjoy my work and I'm in no hurry to retire, even though I can see that age coming up pretty quickly...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  12. Re:Good riddance by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm tired of the smell of curry.

    Then you, sir, are tired of life.

  13. and why do we care? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our educational system has become so damned expensive that only people who don't live here can seemingly afford it. So it makes sense... As to why the visa system is clogged... Maybe the economic hard times have hit government offices partially responsible for it as well? Oh, what sweet revenge. -_- More seriously though, what difference does it make how well we educate people (either people who stay or leave?) if the environmental conditions necessary for real progress are absent? Our intellectual property system has gutted any hopes of "desirable individuals" doing much of anything besides occupying a desk. The medical field is screwed because people are too afraid of litigation to actually practice medicine at less than a 6000% markup on procedures, which is literally killing people who can't afford it anymore. The lawyers are the only ones in this country that are well-off anymore.

    It's no wonder people are jumping ship... Some people looked down the length of the bow and see a giant iceberg in front of the USS Our Future. An iceberg made almost totally of greed, because we couldn't look farther than the end of our damn noses as the social problems we're facing. And leaving is the smart thing -- how long until Canada starts patrolling its borders to keep illegal immigrants from the United States out? Probably not long.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:and why do we care? by MikeUW · · Score: 1

      Those illegal US immigrants are in for a disappointment. It's not so drastically different here.

      Plus they'll have to buy thicker winter jackets and leave their guns at the border.

    2. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just the lawyers that are well off -- greedy, manipulative financial professionals also do quite well.

    3. Re:and why do we care? by SIR_Taco · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Honestly we, Canada, are quite content with the fact that you preach such crazy patriotism to your kids at a young age and we don't have any worries.
            We're taught more to come up with our own views and opinions of the world and the country itself (through school and society). And from looking around, myself, I feel that I live in a country that is much less off-the-wall (so to speak) than the rest of the world. I was not told through school and/or society that I need to worship Canada like it's a second/first religion, however I would put my life up for this country in a heart-beat if it were ever threatened.
            You can't force anyone to love a country, but you can let them.

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    4. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My ex-girlfriend, a federal attorney, declared bankruptcy and walked away from her house when the price dropped.

    5. Re:and why do we care? by Quetzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... As to why the visa system is clogged... Maybe the economic hard times have hit government offices partially responsible for it as well? Oh, what sweet revenge. -_-

      I know you are kidding, but the visa system has always been clogged. So I would say the government continues to operate at the same level of efficiency as before. :-)

    6. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As to why is the visa system clogged... uhm. It's been purposely clogged.

      Year after year, security concerns, screening methods and harsher guidelines have made it slower and slower.

      The fact that you now keep and analyze so much data of the people who want to go to Disneyland, let's not even talk about the poor guy trying to study or work in the US, and the relative rise in visa's price - $100 bucks is a lot in some places, and inflation usually makes that $100 bigger and bigger over time - are just some reasons as to why the immigrant service has been slowing. And more and more immigrants are avoiding the US.

      PS: I refuse to pay for a visa. When US citizens pay for a Mexican visa, then I'll pay for yours.

    7. Re:and why do we care? by Neptunes_Trident · · Score: 1

      I swear, all I ever hear about is the immigrants. Did we forget that within many of our own (now naturalized) families history, we all came from immigrants? (sans Native Americans) I am so sick and tired of the hate people place upon our naturalized citizens of the U.S. community. If you can't afford (or are to greedy) to give jobs to those who are already here, then you most certainly cannot maintain jobs for newly arrived immigrants. Never have I seen such community bias. And as for caring, well she said it right. Education has gotten so damn out of control when it comes to costs, compile that with the cost of of living, and then the sold-out business structures of yesteryear on top of the ridicules business laws that only stagnate cultural and economic growth. It is obvious why, immigrants AND native people here, are getting screwed. The only difference is that Immigrants have another place on this planet they "can" call home. And I bet they will give a damn, far more, about their countries established communities and laws, than we do with our own. I have great grandparents who are immigrants and I know the hard work they did back when they arrived here. But I know they did not count on the fact that once their families became established here in this country, while generations ahead, the community calls us losers and other assorted pathetic names. They would roll in their graves if they saw this happening now. And you know what, I bet today's immigrants get this vibe and they leave the U.S. because they don't want their "future established families" here in the U.S. to be hated on like we obviously do to each other today. Take care of your community first, people, and everything else will fall into place. Then you can jump for joy at the new immigrants who come to this place looking for a better life. Because they will "feel" that we care about our own community. This is how it works, so wake up. This is what "used" to make the U.S. so great. Get a clue.

    8. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I am living in Brazil, and while I got a visa to work here, we have in the same data center three other WHITE ANGLO AMERICANS working illegally, as far as the Brazilian immigration laws are concerned. (They are under a company contract, so as far as Brazilian taxes they are fine)

      So, I don't think we will see the Brazilian DHS hunting my poor fellow citizens here and deporting them. But, many of the American brightest are already leaving, not only by individually emigrating, but also by being transferred overseas, as IBM for example is moving part of their American development team to San Jose dos Campos, a high-tech university town in Sao Paulo state. I mean: moving the WHOLE team, with their families, pets and furniture to a neighborhood where IBM got some houses bought.

      Why I would stay in the US and risk getting laid off because some stupid Financial Officer messed up with the stock of the company, if I can be in Brazil, Australia, New Zeland, China or any other of the places still barely touched by the world depression?

      See, World Bank forecasts a GDP growth of 3 to 4% for Brazil this year, and a GDP growth of 8 to 9% for China. Meanwhile, we in the US will LOSE 4 to 5% of our GDP.

      Brazil and China are not very friendly towards foreigners. If the immigrants don't blend fast in to their respective local cultures they are usually ostracized. But, they are very kind and friendly people if you adapt to them, so why not to adapt?

      Any empire gets to the stage where it begins to fall to pieces. Rich countries built by immigrants, become emigrants' countries. Life goes on.

      I am becoming a Brazilian myself. And I don't even see me going back to the US soon, at least not to live there. Santa Catarina, Sao Paulo, Parana and Rio Grande do Sul (the Brazilian South states) are great places to work and live. I won't be in Rio de Janeiro or Bahia or Recife, for example. Those places are very violent and poor. But here where I am living, in Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, I got a high quality of life, comparable to the US, and for half of the price tag I would have to pay at the cheapest American city.

      See, I am an American expat, and I don't feel bad at all. I am tired of American cities crowded with criminal gangs, and lots of people living in the welfare, in ghettos, barely making it for living. You see those in Miami, NYC, Detroit, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, pretty much everywhere.
      I feel much better, and safer, here in Santa Catarina than I used to feel in Miami Beach.

      So, why not to leave the old USA and live overseas? I see many smart people doing that, and I see lots of stupid people staying behind, so why not to follow the smart?

    9. Re:and why do we care? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      how long until Canada starts patrolling its borders to keep illegal immigrants from the United States out? Probably not long.

      I wanted to move to Canada, but found out I can't get a job there since I'm not a citizen of any of their favorite countries.

    10. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our educational system has become so damned expensive that only people who don't live here can seemingly afford it.

      Most of Chinese got scholarship/fellowship for their high education in the States. Why did they get the scholarship/fellowship? Because their academical excellence, because they began to study to very late in the night, every night, since very young age. What most of American kids were doing at the same age?

    11. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Insightful comment (haven't got any mod points unfortunately though).

      I feel the same way about my home country (Australia). Australians deep down are quite patriotic, but it is a quiet, learned patriotism, rather than the overt 'God bless America' flag-waving culture you see in the US. If you asked us, we wouldn't say we were patriotic. But most would, as you say, defend it to the death if there was a real threat. Life is just too good here to give up easily, it truly is one of the world's best places to live (Canada is nice too BTW from what I've seen) :)

      I'm qualified to talk about this distinction I think, because my wife is in fact an American who has just recently permanently moved here to Australia with me. (Incidentally she's well educated, a good example of the brain drain out of the US). I've also spent a lot of time in the US myself, both for business and pleasure.

      I think the US a wonderful country with some of the friendliest people you will find anywhere. But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism. Flags from every freaking house (here, flags are pretty much just for government buildings etc). HUGE flags on the side of highways and stuff for no apparent reason (why? seriously, why?). In a way, the US displays its national symbol so much and so often that it loses it's importance and meaning I think. Here, we treat our flag with a great deal of respect and use it only for official occasions. And I think it is more symbolic and meaningful because of that.

      So I think your last comment "You can't force anyone to love a country, but you can let them", is a perfect summation. In most countries, people come to love their country gradually and deeply, because they genuinely think it's a wonderful place. In the US though it does seem as if patriotism is more ... indoctrinated into people.

    12. Re:and why do we care? by revoldub · · Score: 1

      Forgive me if I'm being overwhelmingly...close-minded here.

      Is it just me or is the tens of thousands of dollars people spend on university and college pretty much worthless in most countries in which people immigrate here away from dodge?

      I'm not saying our education curriculum is flawed. And I'm certainly not saying that foreign countries systems are weak. I just wonder what $20,000 per year or semester or whatever it is for you is really worth for some average grades, and a piece of paper saying you paid for it.

      Speaking with my high school friends about how much money they're in the red with, while still in school is kind of reassuring for me. On the other hand I'm sure we all know someone who is holding a very nice desk job with a bachelors in art history or some shit.

      Unless of course we're talking about doctors etc. who want to come here for our amazing medical advances, in hopes that they can take this home eventually regardless. In that case I say spend your money as you will. I'm not sure how these university granted scholarships work for non-naturalized citizens but I have a slight problem paying taxes for that. It is right there with having to pay an uninsured tax on car insurance, in case someone who is legally obligated doesn't have car insurance.

      Sorry for rambling I lost my train of thought.

    13. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada: leading the world at being north of the United States.

    14. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada: leading the world at being above the United States.

      fixed that for you

    15. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was this BS modded up? Canadian mods? Where did you get your information from? I, as am American, have never been taught the USA is the greatest nation on earth. We are taught as you say you have been. We learned to make up our own minds and freely express ourselves.

      Typical "mods on crack" Slashdot bull shit.

    16. Re:and why do we care? by ev0l · · Score: 1

      As an American living in Canada I call bull.

      There are just as many flags flying on all sorts of building and homes as their are in the States. Canadians frequently sew canadian flags on their bags/back packs. Canadian symbolism is everywhere even on the new bike racks they are putting up around my neighborhood. Canada preaches "peace keeping", no guns, multi-cultism, universal health care (of the Canadian variety), and other politically identifiable Canadian things to your children and your immigrants. Schools reinforce these notions in the same way that all countries encourage their citizen children to be "better" in those ways that the people who care consider better. Somehow pretending that you are better than Americans because you don't do these things is diluted and silly.

      And this gets me to another point. Canada, and some of her people, far to often define them selves as how they are different from Americans. This is, frankly, sad. Canada is a great country full of great people who care very much for the land they call home. Canada, her populous and her officials should stop defining them selves based on the standards of another country or how they differ from those standards but instead declare she is a great country regardless of how others behave or define them selves. Canada should find its own path.

      -Will

      PS: The weather sucks up here.

    17. Re:and why do we care? by fermion · · Score: 1
      I don't think that education in the US is expensive, it is just that we have an entitlement culture. Just look at what happened when gas prices were high. People felt entitled to cheap gas and started attacking the free market. At some point, that sense of entitlement went away, and they started understanding supply and demand, and prices fell.

      Education is the same thing. Students feel entitled to an education. Many just expect to get accepted to college because they are some sort of aristocracy, and given a grade because they make an appearance. It is like they are not just aristocracy, but royalty, and people should be required to compensate them just for existing.

      Well, that is not the case. Grades are not given, and it is not even about grades. It is about attaining a state where one is in some significant way better on the way out than on the way in. This concept seems to be lost on many in the US, which is why so many colleges have to fill out the ranks with people outside the US. It is not a matter or who can afford to pay, but who is willing to sacrifice to attain an education. Enough education has been wasted on the entitled.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada. America's hat!

    19. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your belief in the indoctrination of American students is apparently the result of Canadian indoctrination. The kind of patriotism you are describing is only useful in a totalitarian system, which is clearly not the strategy of US world domination.

    20. Re:and why do we care? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Parent is absolutely correct. I have a feeling our role in this world will reverse one day. Think of it like this:

      We (the USA) were once an industrial powerhouse ripe with innovation and invention. We founded and drove forward allot of the technology we see today, everything from the automobile to the computer (not saying we invented it but we pushed it all forward). Fast forward and something began to happen. We lost our values and our priorities shifted. Adults, parents, children and young people were content in a rich nation and the value of education began to decline. Plenty of well paying industrial jobs were to be had and everyone was happy. Then companies began to realize manufacturing was a no or low talent job. They could be sent to less fortunate nations who were more then happy to let us setup shop and let the valuable American Dollars pour in. The easy jobs you could get with a high school diploma began to decline. And all the while immigrants came here for an education because the universities tech programs were empty because everyone was busy working in factories. Then as word got out more and more foreigners began to pour in looking for an education they did not have access to at home. Now their countries were depressed, partially impoverished nations. Their standard of living was well below ours. And they came over with their own culture and did not need ours. They ignored our dumbed down entertainment fueled society and happily earned their degrees. Meanwhile our own people were out busy partying trying to fit into a destructive status quo.

      The dumbing down of the USA was our down fall and it is our own fault. Couple that with the exporting of menial jobs and you see the problem we face. People did not have the credentials to get better jobs and foreigners who were here filling our universities while we worked at factories started to fill those jobs for us. Now as the educated foreigners leave and take their knowledge home with them, their country benefits while we rot. Their standard of living will begin to rise as ours falls. All of the people developing our IP which was exported back to their country to be manufactured and then sent back is now lost. Then what? What are we exporting now? What is making the nation money? Nothing. So now what happens? That's right the factories open again. But this time the IP is coming from the countries who's people we educated here. Now we are the poor nation looking to produce for other rich nations. And as they grow fat and lazy as we did they will experience they same educational decline and our home grown smart people will flock to them seeking to fill the empty seats at universities. Rinse, wash, repeat.

      Maybe I don't know what the fuck I am talking about but do you see the point I am trying to make? While we were content the rug was pulled out from under us and no one felt it. The fat cats here are still full of money and can (and already have) setup shop in those countries to resume IP production. They just milked us to death and moved on to other developing cash cows (aka developing nations). I am not angry at anyone person, not even the immigrants. After all we are a nation of immigrants. We were blinded by our fast paced entertainment laden culture to realize what was going on. But I bet who did know, those at the very top of the economic pyramid.

    21. Re:and why do we care? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I think the US a wonderful country with some of the friendliest people you will find anywhere. But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism. Flags from every freaking house (here, flags are pretty much just for government buildings etc). HUGE flags on the side of highways and stuff for no apparent reason (why? seriously, why?).

      Why not? I think it's really nice, actually.

      Of course, I don't know *where* you visited... here in Washington State, flags are basically on government buildings and shopping centers and nowhere else. One in a thousand cards, maybe, has a flag on it. Other states might have many more flags; I don't know, admittedly I'm not widely traveled within the US.

      We also have national holidays during which the majority of people fly a flag, it's possible you were noticing this. President's Day, Veteran's Day, or the Fourth of July. But that's only a couple days a year.

      In a way, the US displays its national symbol so much and so often that it loses it's importance and meaning I think. Here, we treat our flag with a great deal of respect and use it only for official occasions. And I think it is more symbolic and meaningful because of that.

      That's a difference of opinion, not some kind of evidence that the US is doing something horribly wrong.

      I mean, you might have a valid point (although I'm not certain what it would be), but I don't the number of flags has anything to do with anything at all.

      In fact, I'd wager that if you came to the US with a camera, and took a thousand random pictures of a thousand random locations, you'd see the exact same number of US flags as you would Aussie flags if you did the same in Australia. I think what you *really* noticed is how perceptive one is of flags when they aren't their own flags, and how unnoticed their own flag goes. (Note: I haven't actually done this experiment, but I'd love to if I had the time.)

      In most countries, people come to love their country gradually and deeply, because they genuinely think it's a wonderful place. In the US though it does seem as if patriotism is more ... indoctrinated into people.

      To play devil's advocate: are the two mutually-exclusive? Isn't it possible for somebody "indoctrinated" (to use your word) to come to the gradual and deep belief that they live in a wonderful place?

    22. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume you don't live in Quebec.

    23. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On average, lawyers make a good living. A very small percentage become partners at huge law firms and make millions. Many work in government as prosecutors and make very little (less than a starting a CompSci major who has 4 years of college vs 7 for an attorney). Some work as public defenders and make under $30K.

      For those that want to go into private practice, if you get into a top law school, you can make bank (but will probably have $150K in student loans). They, however, work 60-80 hours a week when the economy is good, and now fear of being laid off everyday just like everyone else. Those who go to lower tier schools, well they are often screwed in finding a high paying job (but also have a lot of debt from outrageous tuition). If you read some law school or attorney forums, there doesn't appear to be a lot of satisfaction in the profession.

      Judges only make $100K (Supreme Court Justices around $200K). I just read that a NY Judge's salary extrapolated for inflation in the early 1900s was about $400K in today's dollars; yet now it is only $130K.

      Attorneys make a good living; but maybe its time to go after a different profession. Attorneys aren't the corporate execs getting $100 million bonuses.

    24. Re:and why do we care? by mevets · · Score: 1

      What an un-Canadian posting. You are supposed to yell "Go USA" and smirk quietly, to yourself. The salt mines of Scarborough for you.

      Some of your followups don't seem to get that other countries, including Canada, consider things like school kids reciting the pledge of allegiance to be, uh, kinda nuts. Canada makes its new citizens pledge allegiance to the Queen (once), really as a bit of a joke. If we had more immigrants, we might make them push an egg down the street with their nose as well.

      The poster that thinks there are as many flags in Canada either lives on a military base, has forgotten his homeland or mistaken the flag of some hockey team for the Canadian one [ note the real maple leaf is red, not blue]. Of the countries I've visited, only Northern Ireland comes anywhere close to the American Flag density. On her first time south of the border, my 12 year old innocently asked 'what is with all the flags? Is it USA day? '; which could only be answered 'every day is USA day...'

    25. Re:and why do we care? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      With actual flags, you're probably right. But if you count all the Amerikitsch like antenna-flags and yellow ribbons, we just must come out ahead.

      Even more offtopic: I wonder if they have truck nuts in Australia?
      (http://www.truck-nuts.com/index.html)

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    26. Re:and why do we care? by JudgeJackson · · Score: 1

      As a Canuck living in the USA, I completely agree. Canadian patriotism is often conflated with anti-Americanism. It's an unfortunate brew of ignorance and sanctimony. This is easier to see after living abroad and I find it hard to condemn my countrymen when I too was guilty of the same as a younger man.

      To make this more topical, my own experience living, studying and working in the USA completely reformed my thinking. Now that I'm headed back home (employer closed the office here, don't have a green card) I'll take that with me and maybe, with a little luck, influence a few of my compatriots. So the reverse brain drain might have the benefit of improving America's image abroad.

    27. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, classic blame the education system syndrome. As an immigrant who did my Masters in the US and is still here, I have to strongly disagree.

      My Dad made $600/month during the best of his career and he retired 6 months before I finished my undergrad in India. He still put me through a good school and average college (my fault). When I wanted to do my Masters in the US he took his savings and borrowed money from his friends and gave me enough to last one-and-a-half semesters.

      The rest of the tuition was me working my ass off at the university cafeteria and working up the jobs till I ended up with a Research Assistantship in my final 2 semesters (I was just unlucky for the for the previous semesters - final GPA of 3.9/4.0). My cafeteria job gave me just $450/month. Luckily I studied at Kentucky and was able to not starve to death with that kind of $$. I closed all the loans before I was finished with my MS (2.5 yrs). And this wasn't too long ago. I finished my M.S about 4 yrs ago.

      Having a GPA > 3.0/4.0 in my undergrad also helped. University of Kentucky (where I studied) reduces the tuition to in-state rate for any Masters student who has a GPA > 3.0.

      So, to the people complaining that the education system is not affordable, quit complaining and start working.

      -S

    28. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the economy continues going down the drain for another 2 years the only saving grace of the US would be the relatively less corruption and better law enforcement in the US. Those two equate to better freedom (on paper) when compared to India. In reality (or may be because I was in my teens/not mature enough) when I was in India, I felt more freedom than when I'm here.

      Oh, and the emergency medical attention (not the cost) - Indian roads are so clogged that you will probably die before the Ambulance gets to you.

      So, at the least try to save the freedom and protect your awesome Constitution.

      As for the Grantparent's comments about lawyers, I think part of the blame should also be placed on the sue-happy population. If the population wasn't so happy, the doctor's malpractice insurance rates probably won't be this high. Extrapolate to other professions as necessary.

      -S

    29. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like /. ate my comment! Posting again - sorry if it ends up as a double post.

      Ah, classic blame the education system syndrome. As an immigrant who did my Masters in the US and is still here, I have to strongly disagree.

      My Dad made $600/month during the best of his career and he retired 6 months before I finished my undergrad in India. He still put me through a good school and average college (my fault). When I wanted to do my Masters in the US he took his savings and borrowed money from his friends and gave me enough to last one-and-a-half semesters.

      The rest of the tuition was me working my ass off in a cafeteria and working up the jobs till I ended up with a Research Assistantship in my final 2 semesters (I was just unlucky for the for the previous semesters - final GPA of 3.9/4.0). My cafeteria job gave me just $450/month. Luckily I studied at Kentucky and was able to not starve to death with that kind of $$. I closed all the loans before I was finished with my MS (2.5 yrs).

      Having a GPA > 3.0/4.0 in my undergrad also helped. University of Kentucky (where I studied) reduces the tuition to in-state rate for any Masters student who has a GPA > 3.0.

      So, to the people complaining that the education system is not affordable, quit complaining and start working.

      -S

    30. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australians have a "quiet, learned patriotism"?

      As a New Zealander who has been in Australia for a year, I can tell you that you're viewing things with rose-coloured glasses.

      Funnily enough, I couldn't believe the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism of Australia when I first moved here :) There were flags and stickers of flags on many, many cars and trucks, even some flags on houses! (As a Kiwi, this all seemed ridiculously over the top). I admit it isn't as bad as America, but it is still worse than you think.

      You just have to look at the month or two leading up to, and after, Australia Day to realise that Australia is quickly following America for jingoistic behaviour. For example, the delightful white trash Aussies who were running around saying things like "Australia is full, fuck off" to anyone who looked foreign.

      Lets hope that it settles down over time, because Australia really doesn't want to become a little America. It isn't pretty.

    31. Re:and why do we care? by Pogdranaut · · Score: 0

      An iceberg made almost totally of greed,

      A greedberg ?

    32. Re:and why do we care? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism. Flags from every freaking house (here, flags are pretty much just for government buildings etc). HUGE flags on the side of highways and stuff for no apparent reason (why? seriously, why?). In a way, the US displays its national symbol so much and so often that it loses it's importance and meaning I think.

      It may be hard to understand but for many Americans the flag has meaning beyond merely being the "national symbol." It's the embodiment of our country and ideals; it represents our Constitution and our fight to free us from a king. When we pledge allegiance to it; it's not to the flag but to our ideals.

      It's hard to explain; it's just the way we are. I guess the best way to say it is we show our flag because we are Americans. Sure, it manifests itself in strange ways; that others may find odd. It's not better or worse, just different from other countries viewpoints. Yes, we have our share of problems but we're trying to muddle through and do the best we can.

      Most countries have traditions others find odd. Whenever I'm in the UK I find the fascination with the Queen and all the HRH / ER symbols a bit odd. She's a nice old lady with little relevance to daily life; yet the Brits seem to like here a whole lot and her picture seems to be everywhere. In fact, that whole monarchy thing is a bit strange, if you ask me. Then again, it's their country and they have their traditions. Not better, not worse, just different.

      BTW, I've found the Australians to be the closest to Americans in terms of worldview and viewpoints about things like rules and authority. I wonder if it because we share a common approach to creating a large country as a nation of immigrants.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    33. Re:and why do we care? by cjsm · · Score: 1

      Your English is really fractured for supposedly being an American

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    34. Re:and why do we care? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Even more offtopic: I wonder if they have truck nuts in Australia?
      (http://www.truck-nuts.com/index.html)

      http://www.australiagift.com/scrotum_shop/car_scrotum.htm

    35. Re:and why do we care? by xaxa · · Score: 1

      I think the US a wonderful country with some of the friendliest people you will find anywhere. But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism. Flags from every freaking house (here, flags are pretty much just for government buildings etc). HUGE flags on the side of highways and stuff for no apparent reason (why? seriously, why?).

      Why not? I think it's really nice, actually.

      Of course, I don't know *where* you visited... here in Washington State, flags are basically on government buildings and shopping centers and nowhere else.

      Here in the UK, you'll see the Union Flag on a few important government buildings, and only on some days: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_Flag#United_Kingdom
      You'll see it on the royal palaces too.

      We also don't have any ceremonies about folding them, or disposing of them, or saluting the thing.

      In fact, I'd wager that if you came to the US with a camera, and took a thousand random pictures of a thousand random locations, you'd see the exact same number of US flags as you would Aussie flags if you did the same in Australia.

      No idea about Australia, but you'd see hardly any flags if you did that in the UK. You'd have to find a major British government building, an EU one, or... well, that's about it. No one flies the flag outside their house, which I saw quite a bit in the USA. Things like your national parks had flags at the entrances, all govenment buildings, no matter how small, and some big office buildings.

    36. Re:and why do we care? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      In fact, I'd wager that if you came to the US with a camera, and took a thousand random pictures of a thousand random locations, you'd see the exact same number of US flags as you would Aussie flags if you did the same in Australia.

      Having travelled in both the US and Australia I'm pretty sure that's wrong -- you would see far more US flags than Australian flags in my experience.

      I think what you *really* noticed is how perceptive one is of flags when they aren't their own flags, and how unnoticed their own flag goes.

      Except I am not Australian so it wasn't *my* flag going unnoticed. Furthermore, having travelled in Canada, the UK, and New Zealand, I would say the same about the relative prevalence of national flags there. Am I just somehow failing to notice commonwealth flags? Fine, I've also travelled in Japan and France and, you know what, you get the same result: national flags there are less common than US flags are in the US.

    37. Re:and why do we care? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way about my home country (Australia). Australians deep down are quite patriotic, but it is a quiet, learned patriotism, rather than the overt 'God bless America' flag-waving culture you see in the US. If you asked us, we wouldn't say we were patriotic. But most would, as you say, defend it to the death if there was a real threat. Life is just too good here to give up easily, it truly is one of the world's best places to live (Canada is nice too BTW from what I've seen) :)

      Are you two just being dense? Any group of humans on this planet will put up a fight against those that they see as invaders trying to come take their stuff! The nationalist thing is to get that personal feeling about your community expanded to your entire state/country. I'd bet that even the worst governments on the planet have no or little problems finding people to fight against foreigners. Russian Serfs would have protected Russia to the death against any others coming to invade the mother land.

      You couldn't come up with much worse government example than that than maybe the US during the civil war. If I recall correctly, there were a few places where slaves were even armed to defend their homes. I think that goes more to the number one than the number two. They knew their existing lords/masters and actually feared a change in leadership. They knew their neighbors lords/masters and didn't want them taking control of their home. Of course from the slaves point of view, sure it would have been nice to run off to the Yankees, but how easy would that have been? Nah, staying at your "home" no matter how much you hate/love it and defending it is the easy human choice.

    38. Re:and why do we care? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, in my area there isn't much of that either. I typoed it but I was trying to say maybe one car in a thousand has a flag. Yellow ribbons were more popular a few years ago, but those have fallen by the wayside. The US is a big place also, the number of flags in one state/region says nothing about the others. Washington State culture is as different from New York culture as Australia is from New Zealand, or maybe even the UK.

      I honestly think it's a perception thing: you simply notice flags more when travelling.

    39. Re:and why do we care? by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, ok. Maybe I'm "too American" or something, but I don't see what's wrong or undesirable about the number of flags in the US. I think it's rather nice.

    40. Re:and why do we care? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I've been to Quebec... not sure your post is true.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    41. Re:and why do we care? by russotto · · Score: 1

      Canadians frequently sew canadian flags on their bags/back packs.

      That's the international sign for "I'm not an American, really I'm not, eh?"

    42. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that in the US, government buildings fly a US flag. State government buildings fly a state and a US flag.

      You occasionally see smaller governmental flags, but there aren't many of them.

      National Parks fly them because... they are government facilities. The Franklin Post Office in Philadelphia does not fly the flag, however -- it's the one government facility that pre-dates it.

    43. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think the US a wonderful country with some of the friendliest people you will find anywhere. But the first time I visited I could not BELIEVE the awful, tacky, in-your-face patriotism."

      Interesting both comments came from Commonwealth members. Maybe your history and resulting membership has more to do with your attitude.

      Also, you don't mention when you visited. And where. Sort of important.

    44. Re:and why do we care? by retchdog · · Score: 1

      That's awesome. Thank you.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    45. Re:and why do we care? by Darby · · Score: 1

      It's hard to explain; it's just the way we are. I guess the best way to say it is we show our flag because we are Americans.

      No, it's how the bottom of the barrel of our country are due to them blindly swallowing jingoistic bullshit.
      Rabid flag wavers are *not* patriotic in any way shape or form. They're jingoistic. That's a completely different thing and in fact it's actively hostile to patriotism as made crystal clear during the Bush years with the you're with us or against us bullshit which was quite intentionally directed directly at patriots by jingoistic cowards.

      . When we pledge allegiance to it; it's not to the flag but to our ideals.

      No, you're following a tradition established long, long after this country was established. When people pledge allegiance to the flag, they are young children in school being indoctrinated. Adults don't generally (if ever) say it again after leaving school.

      I mean, seriously, dude, try to at least sound sane. You're just repeating bullshit propaganda. We really need thinkers in this country not ignorant sheep who just keep bleating the same tired easily falsified bullshit.

    46. Re:and why do we care? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Check the south out, there are tons of flags (American and Confederate, heh) and yellow ribbons.

      Certain subcultures have just been taught that if you don't throw "it" out there as hard as you can(whether it be politics or religion or the fact that you have a poodle) then you don't believe it as hard.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    47. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ?? *chuckle*

    48. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      We also have national holidays during which the majority of people fly a flag, it's possible you were noticing this. President's Day, Veteran's Day, or the Fourth of July. But that's only a couple days a year.

      I'm aware of that. It's not like I've just visited the US for short periods. I've spent YEARS at a time there ;)

      I'd wager that if you came to the US with a camera, and took a thousand random pictures of a thousand random locations, you'd see the exact same number of US flags as you would Aussie flags if you did the same in Australia

      Nowhere near it. You're probably right about WA though. I suspect the coastal areas (both west and east) are a lot less flag waving than the midwest. I spend most of my time in the US in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan ... Great Lakes area basically. And in many towns they have a flag hanging from every single street light along most streets (this was in the 2001-2006 period ... apparently the 'flags everywhere' only got installed after 9/11 but have stayed ever since). Furthermore, around every 2nd or 3rd house has a full sized flagpole in the front yard (or one of those little ones that stick out from the wall, for smaller dwellings).

      So yeah it does depend on where you are of course. But in Australia virtually noone has a flagpole at home. Literally 1 in 100,000 I'd say (I can think of only 2 or 3 that I've ever seen in my life here)

      Oh and by the way, no criticism intended. That's just how the US is. I was just observing a difference. If that's what you guys like to do over there I'm all for it :)

    49. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Some seem a bit ... overstated though lol. For example, your post offices almost always have a flag. Which is fine (although they never have a flag in Australia or the UK).

      But seems funny when right next door is a Perkins or something with an ASTRONOMICALLY HUGE flag (I mean like, bigger than a double decker bus sized flag on top of a pole as thick as an oak tree and 10 times as tall). Common sight in the midwest. Every gas station, fast food place, or other random retail establishment has one, and they all try and outdo each other on size.

      And there you have the actual government buildings with their tiny (by comparison) flags. Just seemed amusing :)

    50. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of degree I suppose. We are probably a bit more tacky than NZ or the UK in that regard. But seriously man, multiply it by 50 and you might get close to what the south and midwest of the US are like. It's not even comparable.

      Also what part of Australia are you in? Can't say I've ever seen a flag/sticker on a car or truck here, and I can think of only one or two household flags in the entire city (and people think they are weird). I'm in Canberra. I imagine more working class areas would be a bit more in-your-face when it comes to patriotism though (i.e. a flag on the ute!).

    51. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      And as for those white trash, yeah you see them on the news. But they seem to be an isolated thing ... limited to certain areas in Sydney and Brisbane in particular. Don't think you'll find that happening in Perth/Hobart/Adelaide/Canberra very much.

    52. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Upper idwest / Great Lakes / WI MN MI IL IA. 2001-2009 (I'm there every year for several months).

      And yes I'm quite sure the differences are historical. America fought for its independence. Most Commonwealth nations simply asked for it, and was granted it by the UK Govt. So we probably have less attachment to certain symbols as a result. Hell Australia still has the UK flag in the corner of its, and most people don't really care. (Some do, but most probably don't even think it's an important issue).

    53. Re:and why do we care? by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      BTW, I've found the Australians to be the closest to Americans in terms of worldview and viewpoints about things like rules and authority. I wonder if it because we share a common approach to creating a large country as a nation of immigrants.

      Heh :) I've always thought the same. I meet many Americans over the years (in America) that have never met an Australian before. After a while they often comment that I 'sound British, but act American'.

      Truth is, other than our accent and a few traditions we have as a result of our UK origin, Australia is the 'closest' country to America in the world, as far as worldview/pop culture/attitudes etc, and increasingly language (we pick up most new US slang / terminology but not that much from the UK anymore).

      And we are pretty similar structurally too. Both similar in land areas. Both Federations of states that were originally separate colonies (you have 50, we have 6 ... but same principle). You had to fight for your independence, we just asked for it admittedly. But both countries were built on immigration, by people trying their luck in a new, far-away frontier. So there's quite a bit of similarity there.

      We poke fun at each other on Slashdot a bit of course. But I've travelled to a lot of countries and the US and Australia are really very close. Closer than either is to the UK, these days.

    54. Re:and why do we care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When consulate denies visa or forces you to reapply they are earning revenue. Consulates are doing this deliberately, in certain countries this number is around billion$.

      Jumping of ships is very illogical way. People who are on H1B already fighting to mix with culture, value system and habits away from family without equal rights (all SSN, Medicare contribution etc.. is not useful, but I pay as I earn here..) as status is Alien Resident!! So when you make staying hard it is not jumping ships but refocusing energy where returns are visible.

  14. Re:I guess they ran out by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess they ran out of secret documents and technology to steal

    Yep, they've just found out that they can themselves engineer better stuff than they can steal from the U.S. today.

  15. Rest of the World by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our new paper, "America's Loss Is the World's Gain"...

    Shouldn't that be "America's Loss Is the Rest of the World's Gain"? I know you insist on calling us aliens and think we use strange units like metres and kilograms but we are all part of the same world.

    1. Re:Rest of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you point this "rest of the world" out on a map? I know it's gotta be somewhere around Iraqistan...

    2. Re:Rest of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      think?

    3. Re:Rest of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we are all part of the same world.

      I agree with you, except for Texas.

    4. Re:Rest of the World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I have been gone a long time!

  16. Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    simply tells smart immigrants to wait for a real change before coming back or planning to stay.

    I work with 1 H1B and a few naturalized immigrants who all are very well educated (masters for two of them) and their drive is well beyond what the average "American" I see today. They still want it all. The difference is that they are willing to sacrifice and work for it.

    When schools allow dummies to pass because it isn't fair to hold them back, when schools don't celebrate their brightest because it offends, when doing grunt work on your path through the job market is for losers, what can you expect? Fortunately there are still more of us than them. The problem is that very little is being done to encourage more of those yearning for success who will work for it instead we are now seeing more who expect everything to be done or handed to them.

    Reverse brain drain? It will get worse as some of OUR brightest go overseas to excel.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I work with 1 H1B and a few naturalized immigrants who all are very well educated (masters for two of them) and their drive is well beyond what the average "American" I see today. They still want it all. The difference is that they are willing to sacrifice and work for it.

      And with the H1-B, we show them the door instead of welcoming them to stay. These are the people that we should be encouraging to naturalize... hell, we should scrap H1-Bs completely, IMO, but raise the immigration cap for those wishing to naturalize.

      The US's great economy in the past was built on the shoulders of risk-taking, hard-working immigrants, and now we want to shut the door to protect "our" jobs? That's a recipe for economic stagnation.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by j2210 · · Score: 1

      I hear a lot of talk about parents having a college fund for their kids, or parents paying for their college education - stuff like that. I can't say this is the case for everyone, but I imagine that it hurts some of those kids more than it helps. I just think that if you're at college, paying your own way with the money that you earned, you're going to work harder. It's going to mean more to you. If college gets handed to you by your parents, there's a chance some people might go and party instead of study for that mid-term or whatever.

    3. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know I shouldn't feed the trolls... but you're kidding right?

      The US's great economy in the past was built on the shoulders of the SLAVES of THIEVING immigrants, and now we want to shut the door to protect "our" jobs? That sounds about right.

      Slavery aside, which is mostly a straw man to my argument...

      Cheap labor has been crucial to economic growth in the US. Typically this was immigrant labor in the past. Now we've reduced the flow of cheap labor to a trickle, and it's killing our economy.

      We should welcome hard-working and bright immigrants with open arms... not bar the gates against them simply because they are foreign or different. Competition for jobs will improve the US workforce. It will free up labor to do more valuable jobs.

      I agree offshoring is a problem for the US economy, but it's a complex issue, and the reasons I think it's a problem are not because it causes some Americans to lose jobs. That's simply an effect of the overpricing of US labor.

      The problem with offshoring is that we don't export much to developing nations. If we had a manufacturing base (impossible with our high labor costs, though environmental restrictions are another problem[1]) then creating jobs and wealth in developing nations would be a good thing. But since the only thing we export really significantly is entertainment, we're shit outta luck.

      The answer to this is not protectionism. It's the opposite -- reduce our labor costs so we can export to the countries we offshore to. Then we both benefit.

      [1] I don't advocate reducing environmental restrictions. Instead we need to make sure our trading partners have equivalent restrictions, so we're all on an even playing field.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Our country celebrates achievement... at the Superbowl, at the World Series, at the Grammys, at the Oscars, at the Miss Universe Pageant, at American Idol.

      People like to blame the no retard left behind mentality for our situation, but the anti-intellectual sentiment has been with this country since its inception. For every Jefferson and Franklin encouraging us to be exceptional in everything there is a Jackson and Hamilton ready to make us common and mercantile.

    5. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is we are slowly exiting the development phase and becoming a "real country", as compared to European societies which typically have less economic growth than we do because they have plenty of real estate (300 year old houses) and public institutions (buses, trains, etc).

      We have a history of immigration which contributed greatly to our population. As a population growth mechanism, it is one of the most ideal methods. We could hand pick citizens from other countries and choose the best of the best. Not to mention, overseas travel was only available to the very top citizenry of other countries until shortly.

      Now, we have lost control of immigration and have people illegally staying in our country, some of which people aren't necessarily the brightest or most moral individuals. We also rely more on birthrates, and it seems the lowest class of the population reproduce more than the brightest individuals. Middle class whites are reproducing at levels below replacement rate, currently. Meanwhile, welfare mothers are producing at eye popping rates. Regardless of social class, it's impossible to hand pick children and some people, even of high class, end up with mental problems. The roll-the-dice chance of birth will continue to be a problem, until scientists perfect their genetically influenced abortion magic and society stops rejecting such technology as amoral (which could be never).

      The United States has jumped the shark in terms of immigration, and that may mean we may not remain "world leader" for long.

      But anyhow, that's where the future of the United States is going.

    6. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. We have unqualified ( just having a teachers degree without a solid foundation of maths and science) teaching at all levels of schools. They produce name sake high school graduates. Most of them expect easy A grade in college but fail in their thinking and job functions. They want fat salary but could not justify why they should be paid. Less than 10% of American Graduates are really employable in highly technical field. So, we need non-US students with superior preparation to come, get their graduate degree and work to enrich this country.
      2. If they leave, that does not mean that the top 10% best immigrants leave. Only above average immigrants leave who have no innovative contribution to this countries economy. They have a better middle class life in their country, but will not do breaking research or create a Silicon valley in their native country.
      3. While corruption in the USA is at the upper level of Government, the returning immigrant will face corruption almost on all walks of their life and if US opens the door will fly back without waiting for a second.
      4. Greed at levels - employees, employers and elected crooks have made the American economy as bad as is today.
      But the intellectual and personal freedom in the USA will always triumph, it will take more time though.

    7. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      It was very easy to say "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..." when you don't have to give them shit. Yay, you get grateful hardworking people for free in your country! What a deal!

      Contrast that with today where positive rights occur. Suddenly there are costs in health care, welfare... Now suddenly there are costs to bringing in new immigrants. Hence our attitude today.

      There's also a very colonial attitude that America has developed... similar to the old Britain (well new Britain too :) ) We're too good to sew our own clothes, farm on our own farms, make our own widgets. Those jobs aren't for 'Americans'. They're for the Latins and Asians. So now again you a barrier to proper immigration. If a low-skilled worker comes to America, what job are they going to get? In old times, instead of outsourcing our widget makers to China, we would get Chinese people seeking freedom to be in America making 10 bucks a day.

      But anywhose. It's a whole different ball game.
      Yes, I can say first hand a lot of them are heading back. I can't count the number of people on my team that have gone back. Why would they not go back? They get to be closer to their friends and family, lower cost of living, no threat of visa being revoked...

    8. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Cheap labor has been crucial to economic growth in the US. Typically this was immigrant labor in the past. Now we've reduced the flow of cheap labor to a trickle, and it's killing our economy.

      Cheap labour means great profits to the owning class and everyone else working themselves to death. I, for one, don't want to be forced to work 16-hour days just to be able to afford food, no matter how good that might be for economy.

      We should welcome hard-working and bright immigrants with open arms... not bar the gates against them simply because they are foreign or different. Competition for jobs will improve the US workforce. It will free up labor to do more valuable jobs.

      These more valuable jobs require specialized skills which the newly laid-off worker doesn't have and very likely can't afford to get. This then results in cut-throat competition for whatever jobs he can do, which in turn results at the very least in a paycut and quite likely with outright unemployment, leading to a lower quality of life.

      But it's certainly an improvement from the investor's point of view.

      The answer to this is not protectionism. It's the opposite -- reduce our labor costs so we can export to the countries we offshore to. Then we both benefit.

      Well why don't you go to your boss the first thing and suggest your wage gets lowered? Show us all the benefit of being paid less for more work!

      Protectionism doesn't harm the economy, quite the contrary: it benefits me and most citizens of a developed country doing it. The only ones who it doesn't benefit are those who don't work for a living; since that means the rich and the powerful, you can rest easily: our economy isn't going to be protected.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    9. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Well why don't you go to your boss the first thing and suggest your wage gets lowered? Show us all the benefit of being paid less for more work!

      No need for that... price inflation outpacing wage inflation will take care of that.

      Protectionism doesn't harm the economy, quite the contrary: it benefits me and most citizens of a developed country doing it. The only ones who it doesn't benefit are those who don't work for a living; since that means the rich and the powerful, you can rest easily: our economy isn't going to be protected.

      Sorry to see that you have no understanding of what protectionism REALLY does to an economy. Go ahead, do some research... or read some of the other comments to this article. Protectionism trades short-term gains with long-term losses, which is part of why we're in such a mess anyway.

      Look to history to see what happens to protectionist economies in the long run. They get far eclipsed by non-protectionis countries.

      The only reason to institute protectionist policies is to get a nascent industry off the ground. We don't need that... we just need to be able to compete on labor costs, which protectionism is never going to fix.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    10. Re:Anti Achievement mentality being fostered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't this exactly what we need. If times are tough and we can only count on ourselves then I believe we will see the best in our citizens.

  17. This is bad strategy. by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

    For thousands and thousands of years, the way to increase your nation's power was to go and invade the other nation, subjugate them, and take their stuff.

    The problem is that's a pretty expensive way of going about things. The answer?

    Immigration!

    Why fight through the world subjugating people when you can just open up the gates of immigration and the best, brightest and hardest working of the other nation's populace will voluntarily and at their own expense subjugate themselves?

    Much cheaper and more effective than invasion!

    1. Re:This is bad strategy. by saiha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The issue in the US though is instead of going into development of high-tech fields, Americans have been going into management of those fields. In my biased opinion in general becoming a generic MBA is easier than engineering/science so if eng/sci is being filled by immigrants, natives will go the other route. When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

      We (meaning America) needs to start churning out more home-grown techies. We still want to encourage immigration though.

    2. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 holy crap insightful batman?

    3. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing about techies is, they are smart. They don't want to go into a field with no money and no glory. Especially if they figure that the only job security in their line is to give up doing techie stuff and go into management. (Or, more correctly, that there isn't any job security at all, but there are ways to mitigate risk.)

      There are other options for the technically minded, and they can find those. If they have good enough hours, they can do tech stuff on their free time (or collect board games, that's what I do.).

      If I didn't have a girlfriend and lots of obligations because of that, I'd be teaching English in Thailand. Most of my friends live there or at least go back and forth.

    4. Re:This is bad strategy. by definate · · Score: 0

      You're right.

      The only problem is, you need to be a competitive place to live. America, even though it has vastly changed from what attracted heaps of people, all those years ago, is still extremely competitive on benefits and options than most (if not all) other countries. (I'm not American, have just studied it)

      If they stopped restricting immigrants, and let anyone who wanted to be an American, come to America, they would be a far more prosperous nation, and this would do more to bring them out of the recession, than anything else they are doing.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    5. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      all the while you are watering down your own culture and what made the nation great. If US immigration policy was based purely on skills and letting in the "best & brightest", that wouldn't be as big of a problem. Unfortunately, US immigration policy is based more on importing mass poverty than it is brainpower. We don't need to import some uneducated Saharan refugee to slice up cattle at 1/3 the old market rate and then allow him to bring his entire family over later on under a 'family visa'. We have enough shmucks that can do that. Unfortunately for the employers, they're not dumb enough to work at bargain basement prices.

    6. Re:This is bad strategy. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In my biased opinion in general becoming a generic MBA is easier than engineering/science so if eng/sci is being filled by immigrants, natives will go the other route. When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

      Gee, I don't know... maybe instead we could encourage them to stay? That way, *they* become Americans, and suddenly, we don't have a shortage of Americans with eng/sci backgrounds.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:This is bad strategy. by swb · · Score: 1

      A reasonable argument, but a large reason they are here at all is that employers are unwilling to pay the wages necessary to encourage Americans to do the same work, so the employers bulk import labor at lower rates to suppress wages.

      Thus they are *labor* not immigrants and many cannot simply "stay". If they were actually immigrating to be citizens and engineers, chances are the wages they would paid would be lucrative enough to get Americans to do the jobs since the immigrants would have the same chances at other jobs as Americans (eg, if engineering doesn't pay, do something else instead of being brought here because you are an engineer).

    8. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We (meaning America) needs to start churning out more home-grown techies. We still want to encourage immigration though.

      Maybe we (meaning companies) can start paying more to engineers, then. Let's say I'm in college. Do I:

      (a) bust my ass taking science and engineering courses for a hard job with long hours and mediocre pay?

      or

      (b) get an MBA while spending half my time drunk, and get more money?

      I hear a lot of talk about how we need to have more science and technology graduates. The problem is, these areas require an effort. If we don't offer compensation for this effort, why should people make the effort?

    9. Re:This is bad strategy. by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We need to end the cheap (H1-B) labor for engineering.

      If businesses "need" more engineering labor than the market has available, they need to pay for it, just as they would for marketing or management. Instead they suppress the salaries by importing cheap labor from overseas.

      We also need to undo some of the cultural bias we have for "management" and stop treating management as some kind of aristocratic/Mandarin class entitled to special wages & privileges above the common people.

    10. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If these people were actually immigrating. What they are mostly about is coming to this country and taking the jobs from Americans by working at low rates while claiming advanced degrees and greater work experience than they actually have.

      I do trust the Chinese more but most of the Indians I have worked with lately have exaggerated (read:lied about) their work and education levels. They are not immigrating, they are taking the money and leaving. So they are going home? About damn time.

    11. Re:This is bad strategy. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thus they are *labor* not immigrants and many cannot simply "stay". If they were actually immigrating to be citizens and engineers, chances are the wages they would paid would be lucrative enough to get Americans to do the jobs since the immigrants would have the same chances at other jobs as Americans (eg, if engineering doesn't pay, do something else instead of being brought here because you are an engineer).

      No, it would increase the supply of skilled labor, thus reducing cost of labor across he board for those skilled positions. The immigrants would get paid less, and non-immigrant (native/already naturalized labor) would also get paid less.

      I think this is necessary if we want to fix our economy long-term... reduce labor costs to make them more in line with global labor costs. Reduce our standard of living to more sustainable levels (unless you want to keep borrowing from China to support your SoL).

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    12. Re:This is bad strategy. by LaskoVortex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

      You skipped the part where we landed in a relatively uninhabited continent and exploited its natural resources for 200 years.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    13. Re:This is bad strategy. by SageMusings · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most of the Indians I have worked with lately have exaggerated (read:lied about) their work and education levels.

      Allow me to wreck my karma: You got modded down but I completely agree because I live this hell every day. We do a lot of outsourcing and have had many immigrant coders here on visas. To look at these guys on paper you'd think they were the second coming of Turing. In actual productivity and lines of useable code, it's been a cruel joke.

      Damn right they lied on their resumes and education. What's the worth of an Indian degree? No doubt there must be some jewels that come from those institutions somewhere. Someday I may meet one.

      Immigrant brain drain ? Puleeeze. We are quite fond of saying 90% of developers suck. Well, that applies to immigrants, too. I don't see this supposed exodus as a reason for concern. If anything we may reach a point where companies start to invest closer to home again........nah, that ship sailed years ago.

      --
      -- Posted from my parent's basement
    14. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed!!

      immirants are the America.I hope someday the APACHEs will return to the power and send EVERYONE back to their countries...

      damn, how long the world will have to hear those stupidities from the USA??

      LOL

    15. Re:This is bad strategy. by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      Immigrant brain drain ? Puleeeze. We are quite fond of saying 90% of developers suck.

      You are completely missing the point here. The ones that are staying here are the ones you are talking about, since their lies won't work as good in their home country.

      On the other hand, educated people with ideas, know-how, and patents are the ones leaving for better pastures. Better IP laws, better tax systems, better bureaucratic systems, and etc. These are the people who create jobs and not the ones who take them away from someone.

    16. Re:This is bad strategy. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Well, that did sort of happen, but quite a long time ago. The natives got eradiated, their resources raped and pillaged. And the invaders? Europeans.

      Before, there were very few natives, and a lot of resources. So the invaders taking over was like a kid at the buffet counter of a candy store. And everybody who watched from outside wanted in. That pretty much describes American history from the colonial period to now. And I do mean American history, because the same happened and is happening in Canda, Central and South America.

      And of course, the kid eventually gets fat and lazy from having too much candy. But that seems to just be a U.S. problem.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    17. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it is not true.
      The vast majority are the not so good and hard working with a real good dollop of the sly and lazy.

      Just see how England is having to deal with all the folk looking to get into a high quality socialist nation where once they arrive on land they get free lodging, food, and if anyone talks bad about them they get relegated to the bad guy section of the liberal bullshit police.

      Still, immigration is often good. Just not the way you envision it.

    18. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do churn out a bunch of home grown techies.
      We also churn out a bunch of bureacrats and other pencil pushers.

      I agree with you that tech is harder than management (I am a CPA with masters in Computer Science and a BS in Engineering and a BS in Accounting) but in my opinion, most of the tech from overseas is way overrated. Many of these guys lie about degrees or the degrees are not really the same as ours. Of every one Indian I meet that blows my socks off, I meet ten more that are pure bullshit artists. Many pretend to not understand english so that they can slide on some liberals over expectations of skill and under expectations of responsibilty.

      All in all, I would say that the best and brightest stay home, some very good ones come here, and a crappile of dumbasses are right behind them. If they are really that good, then they dont need to go home. They kick enough ass that they dont need a handout.

      I think some people call this phenonomon Competition? social darwism? survival of the fittest?

    19. Re:This is bad strategy. by thej1nx · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You demonstrate an unsurpassed lack of understanding of macro-economics. If the labor is expensive, than pray thee, how do you make american products compete in the international market? There is a reason why global markets are flooded with China-made products. They are cheaper than competing products of similar quality.

      Businesses always need cheap labour, to reduce cost and therefore maximizing profit or at least competitiveness. If Americans were willing to reduce their pampered exhorbiant standard of living, and work for less, the american economy would stand a chance. Especially since America was the one going around forcing globalisation down the throat of these very same countries. Now that the mass global market is a reality, you literally have a tiger by its tail. Obviously any such suggestions of perhaps lowering the over-bloated standard of living, would be met with shocked cries of "You just want to make us ALL poor, you damned communist!".

      Thing is, the American standard of living ensured that the prices for even basic things like food, that cost mere cents in other parts of the world would cost Americans more, since they would be subjected to much higher quality control. Every one wants a gas-guzzling car, instead of using mass-transport. And it is simply unthinkable for Americans to let go of these addictions, to the extent that they cannot even consider surviving on a lower salary(perhaps the system they have set up will not even allow them to), and thus cannot compete in the global market. Only one phrase comes to mind.

      Adapt or die.

    20. Re:This is bad strategy. by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      If Americans were willing to reduce their pampered exhorbiant standard of living, and work for less, the american economy would stand a chance.

      You seem to assume the cost of living doesn't have anything to do with it. These days, many Americans are trying hard to hold onto their house, avoid foreclosure, and keep being laid off so they won't have to go live in a mud hut or a tar-paper shack. I would hardly call that kind of life exorbitant. Just because foreigners can work for cheap (and go back to their own country when they're done) doesn't mean that Americans are able to do so and have a life worth living. Most of us can't go anywhere even if we wanted to.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    21. Re:This is bad strategy. by tyrione · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

      For thousands and thousands of years, the way to increase your nation's power was to go and invade the other nation, subjugate them, and take their stuff.

      The problem is that's a pretty expensive way of going about things. The answer?

      Immigration!

      Why fight through the world subjugating people when you can just open up the gates of immigration and the best, brightest and hardest working of the other nation's populace will voluntarily and at their own expense subjugate themselves?

      Much cheaper and more effective than invasion!

      That works until you reach critical population mass and if you haven't vigorously invested in training and education of that critical mass you screw yourself out of that leadership position, with respect to the rest of the world.

    22. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This actually made Americans the best managers, and this is very good thing. I worked in many companies, and Americans and Germans provide the best management, and it is a real pleasure to work with American managers (unlike Germans). And companies managed by Americans indeed have higher profits and brighter future than other ones.

      Don't underestimate the importance of the management skills. This is what drives your nation forward.

    23. Re:This is bad strategy. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You demonstrate an unsurpassed lack of understanding of macro-economics.

      If the labor is expensive, than pray thee, how do you make american products compete in the international market? There is a reason why global markets are flooded with China-made products. They are cheaper than competing products of similar quality.

      Productivity. It's not the cost of labor but the cost per unit of production. If an item is labor intensive then the cost of labor is a significant input and you will look to lower your production cost by seeking cheap labor. This is general an item that requires little skill to produce. OTOH, if you can produce a lot of products or a high value product with your labor, the cost of the labor is less important. In many cases, this requires a skilled labor pool that is not easily replicated by simply moving a factory.

      China produces a lot of goods because they can be mass produced cheaply with a lot of labor; and labor is easy to get rid of when demand drops. China is just starting to see the social costs it faces as a result of its economic model; from both the downturn and competition from other places that are even cheaper. That's nothing new, it happened to the US, Japan and Korea as other countries became cheaper sources of labor; and companies moved to more those places or went up the food chain to higher end products and automation to become more productive.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    24. Re:This is bad strategy. by Bysshe · · Score: 1

      Hmm, if you think an MBA is easy (or even just easier), you should go do one at a top-20 school. Equations aren't hard. Applying them is.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    25. Re:This is bad strategy. by bentcd · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of Americans don't realize why America became the superpower it is.

      You skipped the part where we landed in a relatively uninhabited continent and exploited its natural resources for 200 years.

      And then came largely unscathed out of a war that pretty much obliterated the production capacity of the rest of the world. That sort of thing can really work wonders for competitive advantage.

      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    26. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's precisely your attitude that is the problem.

      Consider two people. Both of them have gotten or want to get an education in a certain field (business, engineering, science, whatever). Both of them have, let's assume, about equal talent. Both of them live in the USA. Both went to or want to go to a US-American university. Both are working or want to work for a US-American company. Both want to keep on living in the USA.

      Why - WHY! - does it matter where they're from? The whole notion that one of them is "more special" because they were born in the USA while the other wasn't is what turns people away - the inherent racism in the idea that somebody is somehow just a second-class human being, less important, less deserving of respect, while the other is entitled to an advantage over them just because of irrelevant things like where their parents are from.

      It's the attitude that there's an "us", that being America(tm), and a "them", that being the immigrants who steal Our Jobs(tm) that's the problem.

      Seriously. Faced with attitudes like that, is it really a surprise that some people really DO get fed up - that they really do become disillusioned when they find that the place that they were promised, a place where most everyone is open and welcoming, a cultural melting pot where it's your skill and your willingness to work hard that determines whether you'll succeed rather than the colour of your skin and all that - that this place doesn't exist? That there's people like YOU who will always consider them second-class, people who feel that as "real Americans(tm)", they're entitled to be the first in line for everything?

      I know I'd be disillusioned.

    27. Re:This is bad strategy. by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Thing is, the American standard of living ensured that the prices for even basic things like food, that cost mere cents in other parts of the world would cost Americans more, since they would be subjected to much higher quality control. I'm going to go with: I'm unwilling to live at the Chinese standard of living just to be employed. You are more than welcome to put your children at risk for poor quality control, but I'm not. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Chinese_milk_scandal#Victims

    28. Re:This is bad strategy. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      But that's not necessarily the same set of people that the article is talking about. You're talking about people who get a subpar education in their home country, doctor it up, then get hired to work here and do substandard work. On the other hand, many of the people the article is talking about came here to get a very good education, and are now taking those skills home with them rather than getting a job here.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    29. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you making the mistake of assuming that I want the government to become a superpower?

      On the contrary, the bigger the government, the more death and destruction they cause. As it is, the US government has been at war with someone, somewhere, for every single year of the past 100 years. The US government is also the only government in history to actually use a nuclear weapon against human beings (innocent human beings at that). Do you think that might have something to do with having superpower status? You're damn right it does.

      You might think you're getting something out of it, but I sure don't. I've already got plans to bring my skills and knowledge to a country with a government that simply can't afford such deep and ubuquitous power. All governments operate in self-interest, but even so, the smaller ones just don't have the capacity to corrupt on the level of a superpower.

    30. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with the "own expense" part. While in engineering graduate school ALL of my peers were from other countries; However, tuition and living stipend was funded by the US taxpayer. The most commonly asked question was, "Why does the US pay to educate foreigners?"

    31. Re:This is bad strategy. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      True, but in doing so many people/families that are "hanging on" also keep hanging onto such discretionary costs as entertainment systems, entertainment spending (Cable/sat, etc) and drinking/dining. Things might be not so tight for lots of people if they thought of their luxuries as such and scaled them back, rather than being part of the base-line for living.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    32. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Crapile"?

    33. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Nations become powerful and strong by educating their own citizens - not the citizens of foreign countries.
      Our current policy of maintaining a pittifully poor and expensive public school system is only made possible by the
      elite's ability to import foreigners for our Universities to train for our economy. This is a losing system for the
      US.

    34. Re:This is bad strategy. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Um, no. The reason America became a superpower is because of WWII. The end result of WWII was all the industrialized nations of the war destroyed each other, except for the USA which was left completely untouched (except for one harbor in Hawaii). After the war, USA's industry (which was in great shape, not having been bombed, and having been geared up for high production for wartime) helped rebuild all the Western industrialized countries, at a huge profit. Americans have been living large on that ever since, with additional boosts from things like the commercialization of the internet.

      Now, however, we've gone on a huge spending spree by overvaluing our houses and selling them to each other while not actually producing anything useful, and we're now paying the price for that.

    35. Re:This is bad strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real, these people do not immigrate to the US, they are here on H1-B Visas. I say let them go home and don't let the jet's door hit them on the way out!!!

    36. Re:This is bad strategy. by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Reduce our standard of living to more sustainable levels (unless you want to keep borrowing from China to support your SoL).

      I'd agree with everything you said except for this line here.

      Standard of living is not a zero sum gain. The US having a high standard of living does not make some other nation automatically have a lower standard of living.

      The main reason the US, Japan, Korea, Europe and other nation have a high standard of living is because of its technology and infrastructure, not its money supply.

      Simply paying people more or less does not automatically mean the standard of living will change. Yes money is required to research technology and infrastructure, but technology and infrastructure stream line the process and in effect make everyone more productive with less time spent.

      That way people are spending more time enjoying life and not doing extreme manual labor just to eat. That was the whole point of the industrial revolution.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  18. China moving into the vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Other countries seem quite happy to move into the vacuum being left by the US's policies on visas and visitors. For example, at my university a number of "study in China" scholarships have recently been announced. China is also aggressively pursuing research collaborations within Australia.

  19. They will lead a better life "at home" by bogaboga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A colleague of mine decided to return to Africa. The money he collected over seven years in the USA would enable him live a better life in his homeland.

    A mansion, with a swimming pool and three maids only costs him about 900 dollars to maintain. The respect he would get from the community would be greater and he'll have a chance to eat fresh "organic" fruit.

    All in all...good for them...I wish them all the best.

    When the economy picks up, I will welcome them to the mighty USA.

    1. Re:They will lead a better life "at home" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will be doing the same thing soon. I have lived in Canada for 5 years but will be returning to my country of birth because i can "retire" at 30 and start my own company with no money pressures. I can't afford to do that in Canada, but back home I can.

    2. Re:They will lead a better life "at home" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, that could work, but I don't think they've perfected cryonics just yet, and are you sure it will be the United States then and not just a bunch of warring Grand Duchies and city-states?

    3. Re:They will lead a better life "at home" by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, you now know a potential warlord in another country if things get REALLY bad all over. Definitely a win-win.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  20. I can't for the life of me work out what would by goldcd · · Score: 0, Troll

    have made them want to leave..
    ..I mean just look at the friendly and completely non-xenophobic 'anonymous' posts that seem to have coagulated beneath this story.

    1. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by radtea · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...have made them want to leave..

      I've worked in the US twice, the first time in the early '90's in southern California, the second more recently in New England. Both times I felt like kissing the soil of my native country upon return.

      Individual Americans are some of the most decent people I've met. Collectively, though, you people scare me.

      The change between the early '90's and post-9/11 was striking, from the crazy stuff on TV (Glenn Beck pronouncing that 'security' is the most important thing to any American, when once upon a time it would have been something called 'liberty'), fast-food places with signs announcing that they only hired legal American citizens, and of course the Military Commissions Act of 2006, which temporarily stripped people like me from having access to Habeas Corpus protections.

      On the surface, everything was the same. Underneath, the picture was not pretty.

      The team I worked with was mostly non-Americans, from both the Far East and Europe, and most of them were highly educated and wanted to stay, but I could never figure out why.

      On the good side, like Churchill said, Americans will always find the solution to the problem... after they've tried everything else.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    2. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      On the good side, like Churchill said, Americans will always find the solution to the problem... after they've tried everything else.

      Well, you know, your keys are always in the last place you look...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by steelfood · · Score: 1

      The team I worked with was mostly non-Americans, from both the Far East and Europe, and most of them were highly educated and wanted to stay, but I could never figure out why.

      What's here is better than what they have at home.

      For the moment anyway.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    4. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Individual Americans are some of the most decent people I've met. Collectively, though, you people scare me.

      I don't think that you meeting, on the individual level, decent Americans is surprising. There are many decent people most everywhere. Problem, it seems, is that there are idiots everywhere who outnumber the decent people, in addition to the people who are neither good nor evil, but dumb, useless and easily lead.

      Israel/Palestine, India/Pakistan, China/Twain, Bosnia, etc.
      Lex Luthor summaries nicely.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nl9409NQPuU

    5. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Harry Mulisch once explained:
      In an average group of 13 perons, there is one good person, one evil person and eleven others that follow whoever comes along with a good story. Best illustrated by: Jesus and the twelve Apostles.

    6. Re:I can't for the life of me work out what would by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      "Individual Americans are some of the most decent people I've met. Collectively, though, you people scare me."

      A person is decent, people are scary. Please do not limit this to Americans only. It's like that everywhere.

  21. Protectionism by Legion_SB · · Score: 5, Funny

    Adding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country.

    I like my protectionism like I like my women: passive aggressive!

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
    1. Re:Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, I like my women like I like my coffee: covered in bees!

    2. Re:Protectionism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, I accidentally left the windows down on your car right before the rain. I'm very sorry about that. By the way, I changed my grandmother's recipe since you didn't like the taste of the chicken.

      I love you,

      Misses Legion_SB

    3. Re:Protectionism by speedingant · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean honey?

  22. Much ado about nothing... by jeko · · Score: 4, Informative

    The temporary H1-B visa was supposed to be good for seven years. The average age at which H1-Bs come to this country is fresh out of college, so 22-23 years old plus seven years is about thirty.

    All this says is that the H1-B visa program is working as advertised.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All this says is that the H1-B visa program is working as advertised.

      And it shows just how stupidly designed the H1-B visa program was in the first place. These people are precisely the types we want as citizens. It should never have been temporary in the first place. It should have been designed to be a fast track to a green card. Instead it was designed as a way to put artificial leverage on these people to keep them under the thumbs of their corporate employers - in direct contradiction of traditional american values like being the "land of the free."

    2. Re:Much ado about nothing... by whoever57 · · Score: 1, Troll

      The temporary H1-B visa was supposed to be good for seven years. The average age at which H1-Bs come to this country is fresh out of college, so 22-23 years old plus seven years is about thirty.

      You are wrong on both counts.

      Firstly, H1 visas are considered a "dual intent" visa. It is expected that some people on H1s will transition to Green Cards and then to citizenship.

      Secondly, if the average age of H1s is "fresh out of college", that would imply that half the H1s come into the country before graduating. Since having a degree is usually required for an H1-b visa, this seems rather unlikely, so I conclude that you pulled that figure out of your ass.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:Much ado about nothing... by sbeckstead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I really wonder how many of you still know what the word "Free" means or how to apply it.

    4. Re:Much ado about nothing... by bertramwooster · · Score: 1

      Really? I hold a Phd in Electrical Engineering from Maryland and I have several good friends who got their PhD's in the US (all of them had their tuition paid and stipends) and are now in India. Their average age is around 30 as well. Some of them worked here for a couple of years. I still think that the US attracts a lot of students who want to excel in engineering and science. Getting a suitable job in India for these highly qualified people is difficult because of the competition and the scarcity of good jobs, but that is fast changing.

    5. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those people couldn't have been working on citizenship in the 7 years they were here? Maybe the fact that they're leaving means they never wanted to stay in the first place..

    6. Re:Much ado about nothing... by rossz · · Score: 1

      I've been saying for years that we want the best and the brightest. Not for a few years, but permanently. The work visas should be tied to progress towards citizenship. The temporary visa should be revoked immediately if the person fails to apply for citizenship at the appropriate time, or is found to not be eligible for some reason (e.g. committed certain crimes). It should be made easier for a work visa holder to switch jobs so they can no longer be exploited by companies. Simply remove the tying of a visa to a specific company as is done now and make it no more than a simple formality to file an employment change. REAL comparisons of salaries (which should include average hours worked) should be made, and companies found to be paying less than market rate to visa holders should be fined big time along with the difference plus penalties being paid to the worker.

      A big however. When there are citizens lining up to get jobs and the unemployment rate is growing, the work visas should be seriously curtailed. Sorry, but harsh reality.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    7. Re:Much ado about nothing... by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 1

      You're right that the phrasing in the OP was technically inaccurate.

      However, you're also a fucking moron.

    8. Re:Much ado about nothing... by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      However, you're also a fucking moron.

      No, no, no: you're doing it wrong.

      The correct response is "Also, fuck you".

    9. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, fine, but that's not how the article is phrased. You're talking about an entirely different subject, one that *wasn't* covered by this particular sensationalist piece of reporting.

      I agree that this whole thing reeks of "not news."

    10. Re:Much ado about nothing... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      traditional american values like being the "land of the free."

      Land of the free? I thought it was the land of the guns!

      Bye bye karma...

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    11. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are not fresh college grads but people with advanced degrees. A PhD graduate (with some work experience in between degree levels), will be pretty close to 30.

    12. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They know... "I would like free extra large cola with it, please".

    13. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you modded this no-content tripe "insightful" kill yourself.

    14. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on /. is one a moron for being right.

      Or are the responses to my correction of the OP based on some other prejudice?

    15. Re:Much ado about nothing... by mahadiga · · Score: 1

      All this says is that the H1-B visa program is working as advertised.

      Here is the difference

      • Albert Einstein re-invested his earnings back in America.
      • I am on H1B and transferred my earnings in America back to my home country, India.
      --
      I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
    16. Re:Much ado about nothing... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      I really wonder how many of you still know what the word "Free" means or how to apply it.

      What is your point?
      Are you trying to dispute that government policies that place people under the direct control of other people, artificially restricting the free market for labor, is somehow NOT in contradiction to the meaning of the word "free" in the phrase "land of the free?"

  23. Competition by jnnnnn · · Score: 1

    I fail to understand why this matters. As long as they're working somewhere, that's good, right? They might even help the people they're working with in countries other than America.

    Why does it have to be a competition?

  24. Protectionism worsened the Great Depression by EMB+Numbers · · Score: 0

    Protectionism deepened and worsened the Great Depression.

    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/id/17606.htm
    "...beggar-thy-neighbor" policies of the 1930s. ... For example, U.S. imports from Europe declined from a 1929 high of $1,334 million to just $390 million in 1932, while U.S. exports to Europe fell from $2,341 million in 1929 to $784 million in 1932. Overall, world trade declined by some 66% between 1929 and 1934."

    1. Re:Protectionism worsened the Great Depression by Logic+Worshiper · · Score: 1
      Clearly when the global economy goes to hell exports and imports will drop. That doesn't mean lower exports and imports made the problem worse, just that they were a symptom of it. Correlation is not causation. Your own link says...

      Scholars disagree over the extent of protection actually afforded by the Smoot-Hawley tariff; they also differ over the issue of whether the tariff provoked a wave of foreign retaliation that plunged the world deeper into the Great Depression.

  25. Can you blame them? by deodiaus2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, there are two major factors.
    1) Given the current recession, the number of jobs have fallen off. That and there is pressure to hire an American over someone on a visa. Plus, maybe the foreigners don't want to pay our debt due to all of the bailouts and "Economic stimulus".
    2) Xenophobia is alive and well. Even if there were no 9/11, there was a fear of foreigners in the US. Be it left over hostiles from the Cold War, hatred towards Mexicans and South Americans for taking "good jobs" from Americans, Native Americans wanting their land back, or African-Americans wanting a piece of the American Dream and compensation from slavery, there are build up resentments which have been under the surface.
    Whenever you evaluate a strategic game or a problem, you can see it by seeing it from the opponents point of view.

  26. Great! by xplenumx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Training foreign students served two purposes. First, so we have an opportunity to hire the best and brightest. Secondly, so we can expose them to our culture. What better way is there to bring about change in a country than to train some of their top academic leaders? This is how you bring human rights to China and reduce corruption in Mexico.

    1. Re:Great! by pavera · · Score: 1

      Its also the brilliant strategy that has brought us al queda and most of the leaders of terrorist sponsoring countries.... so you go right ahead with your bad self

    2. Re:Great! by syraq · · Score: 1

      Assuming they like to be exposed to your culture. Remember that Bin Laden was not that thrilled about his time in the US and later decided to do something radical.

      Besides, is it not a positive thing that highly educated people from under developed countries are going back to contribute to their own country? At least I think so. Yes the economy sucks these days but if you ask yourself who needs to improve their living standards the most, USA or underdeveloped countries, I think (or at least hope) most of you go for the latter.

      I am working within the Erasmus Mundus External Window Cooperation which is en education program funded by EU. One of the goals for this program is to make sure people from 3rd world countries are given a chance to study at a higher level on a full scholarship in Europe. The EU also strongly recommend that after they have completed their courses, they return to their home country to prevent brain drain. I think the US can afford this as well.

      It will not kill us to share the wealth a little.

      --
      You know, I always wanted to be a dancer, but I could never get the shit off my shoes
    3. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have no corruption here in the United States. Everything is just going great!

    4. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A good bit of this is what you train them IN. Training someone in how to bring about a revolution... what are you telling them? You're telling them: Might makes right, and we're mightier. Do as we say and we'll share some power with you. Why should they pay us allegience after that? If we thought loyalty was a good thing, we clearly wouldn't have used middle-easterners to fight other middle-easterners.

      So, armed with the knowledge on how to start revolutions, the dispassion to ignore cries to stop from the people you'd expect him to side with and an ethos of "betrayal is fine, ends justify means" what did you expect?

      Never train someone to do X if you don't want it done to you.

      Altruism, teaching those in other countries how to better themselves leaves others with no desire to kill the goose that lays the golden egg.

      Telling them mass slaughter for fun and profit is ok is bound to have negative consequences.

      Also, on Osama... he was supposedly a devout believer in purist Muslim supremacy from early on. Why teach ANYTHING dangerous to a man you know believes you're scum to be destroyed?

      There's plenty of Muslims living peacefully in the US, sure, but it's no secret that in the Middle East many are raised to believe they are the chosen ones, there to subjugate all others by any means necessary. Try to teach them otherwise with a Sunday school and their society will tell them we're helping the evil one by challenging their faith, and the fact that we did so PROVES we're evil.

      They aren't just making random statements either, they have "proof". Just as the meteor "proves" their faith, the handful of coups we've sponsored in Iraq and Iran proves we don't care for the people of the region. Iran's current leadership took power after expelling the last figurehead we put in place there. They're angry for a reason.

      Lets also not forget Israel. Love them or hate them, we give them huge amounts of economic and military support. Given much of the Muslim world considers them "the enemy", we'd become the enemy just for supplying them if we weren't already.

      Politically, our coups make us the enemy.
      Militarily, our support for Israel makes us the enemy.
      Economically, our embargo of Iraq made us the enemy.
      Religiously, our being anything other than Muslim (in a true-believer society) made us the enemy.

      Why would we teach someone who is our enemy on every ground imaginable how to fight?

      Sure we might both have wanted to see the USSR go down, but we knew full well he wanted US down to, from the beginning.

      The ultimate problem is the existence of people willing to commit mass slaughter over beliefs ungrounded in evidence, but we have wackos every bit as crazy (though less well coordinated) in America. There are Christians who think no non-Christian can be a decent person, who think we should nuke the WHOLE middle east and be done with is, who think it's ok to force their PERSONAL beliefs on everyone else.

      When all they're doing is shutting down the local porn store, it's annoying to see them harassing others over unproven beliefs that X is bad. What will we do when one of these moral crusaders decides we need a Christian Taliban? Do you drink? Not all Christians think it's acceptable. Do you go to church Sunday? Some think that's bad, go Saturday. Some insist on Sunday, some think dancing is evil.

      We still teach these people in school, and leave the military open as an option to them.

      In time, we'll find unquestioned belief to be the biggest enemy of mankind. (In that we become self-destructive) This will be fought greatly, as the open fight against it will mean the end of both the Democratic and Republican parties, both surviving on a "love my platitudes and be angry at the bad stuff the other party did, but don't look at MY voting record" platform.

    5. Re:Great! by XchristX · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      This is how you bring human rights to China

      Extremely unlikely. Most of the Chinese students at my University are ferociously ethnocentric about their government, and immunize it from criticism using some pretty nasty hesperophobic bile.

      In fact, their justifications for China's deprivations in Tibet are astoundingly similar to 19th century European Orientalism and Colonialism (apparently, the Tibetans are "uncivilized savages who eat people and drink blood" and the Chinese are only trying to "civilize them" by taking away their land, ethnically cleansing them in droves and bilking their natural resources to feed the Chinese economy).

      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    6. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or as they see the hardworking NOT promoted, and instead random managers hired directly from outside, not caring if they do well since they can just find another job...

      I'm afraid an honest look at big business tells them "connections mean everything, integrity and hard work nothing, and crime / scams are ok... so long as you have the right connections."

      Maybe this should be put on hold until we clean house here...

    7. Re:Great! by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Moscow had its own centers too, far away from its own students.
      Really just a rush to grab and shape the next generation of 2nd and 3rd world countries.
      Do you want some developing country buying MS, Ford, GM ect.?
      Or something from Moscow, China, France, the UK or Brazil?
      You get and shape the next generation of 'top students' that will sign off on millions and billions in later life
      Or allow exploration by US back company for an exotic material nobody really saw becoming strategic.
      You want "Training foreign students" to see Made in the USA as the top 3 options, not just part of a mix of options when their country, gov agency, spy agency, space agency, company or state wants something.
      Get them young.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    8. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Secondly, so we can expose them to our culture.

      Didn't the 9/11 guys live here for quite a while? It didn't change their minds, and all it would have taken was one of them to rethink their idiocy and turn.

    9. Re:Great! by dargaud · · Score: 1

      apparently, the Tibetans are "uncivilized savages who eat people and drink blood"

      Well, I don't know about the eating people part, but when I was in a restaurant in Tibet, I remember a dish of "sheep's intestine in goat's blood". I did try to order it but first our customary chinese 'guide' wouldn't let me, then they were out.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, please don't be modest and tell us what you really think. I mean isn't the usa "the greatest, best country God has ever given man on the face of the Earth".
      http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/174546/june-19-2008/sean-hannity-loves-america

      How could other cultures know of human rights or the rule of law? didn't the usa invent them and dispense them like shiny drops of civilization upon the dark-skinned tribes?

    11. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait. I thought we were trying to addict them to Big Macs?

    12. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you want to end corruption in Mexico stop consuming drugs, that is all.

  27. Immigration/Emigration problem by technomom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next time you complain about immigration into the USA, consider how much worse things will be when people no longer even want to come here. Worse, that American citizens start leaving for greener pastures. That day may be coming.

    If we have an "immigration problem", it's generally a sign of a healthy economy. It's when we have an "emigration problem", that you know things will be really rough.

    1. Re:Immigration/Emigration problem by Technician · · Score: 1

      Worse, that American citizens start leaving for greener pastures. That day may be coming.

      They simply follow the manufacturing and engineering jobs as they relocate to business friendly locations.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Immigration/Emigration problem by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      But yet, in the end they'll be back in the USA again.

      The reason is simple: despite the current economic downtown, the US economy is still on a stronger foundation than other countries around the world--and unlike most of the world, the USA can evolve its economy fairly easily.

      I mean, think about this:

      Europe has a gigantic problem where their banking system is far more leveraged than any US bank. The possibility of the failure of RBS, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Commerzbank, Deutsche Bank, or any of the major Swiss banks is no longer far-fetched--and a failure of any of those banks will have horrific consequences. As a result, the Euro is not as safe an alternative to the US dollar as first thought.

      China and India still has to come to grips with three major problems: the disparity between the rich and poor, the very serious overpopulation problem, and reducing the pollution caused by the sheer mass of humanity in these countries. These problems will soon start to suck up whatever trade balance positives these countries have.

    3. Re:Immigration/Emigration problem by Shajenko42 · · Score: 1

      "Business friendly" meaning lacking worker protection laws and basic human rights laws.

  28. okay. bye. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    I work with lots of Indians and Chinese. And most are very good workers and smart.

    But times are tough right now. Everyone is hurting. It's going to be tough to justify more work visas and green cards when companies are laying off.

    The economy will turn around some day and hopefully things will be different for these workers then.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  29. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what happens when you promote a culture that punishes and ridicules those who are intelligent and successful and rewards stupidity and laziness.

    1. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up egghead. America has no place for your point-headed "cause and effect".

  30. Good riddance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, if we could just get them to take their more stupid friends with them, then America can fully implode with out foreign impedance.

  31. Wait a minute... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you saying my immigrant coworkers who aren't planning on leaving are stupid? That seems both rash and mean. You take it back!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  32. If the playing field were level, ... by BillAtHRST · · Score: 5, Insightful

    then things might be different.
    As it is, the H1B program has merely managed to feed the "fat cats" without improving the lot of US citizens.
    By all means, encourage immigration of hard-working, talented, intelligent people.
    But allow them to control their own destinies and compete without handicapping them or US citizens by institutionalizing a system that unfairly depresses wages for all.
    Maybe we've just reached a sort of equilibrium here, where US wages have stagnated while the rest of world's has grown.

    1. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      It's the job insecurity that H1-B entails that is a problem.

    2. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by hibiki_r · · Score: 5, Informative

      The H1-B program is evil, but even if anyone that qualified for an H1-B could ask for a green card instead, it'd still be painfully slow. Let's look at the Green Card process. How long does it take for people who have jumped through all the hoops to get one?.Take into account that, depending or where you come from, it could have taken close to a decade to get to this step:

      https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC

      I-485 processing times, the last, step in the process: It takes over 9 months for people seeking asylum, And close to two years for employment-based applications. Someone with an October 2007 filing date probably has another year or two left, given the flood of applications they had that summer.

      So it's not just the H1-B process that is slowing people's mobility. The H1-B's trying to stay, and that work for companies willing to jump through all the hoops for them, have flooded the Green Card process anyway.

    3. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by MikeB0Lton · · Score: 1

      Shoot, half the time employers don't even pay citizens the US market average. Government jobs also seem to have a reputation for underpaying staff when compared to the surrounding area.

    4. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but the employer is also required to post each new H1-B petition form (which includes said salary) on a public place in the office. Usually those are posted in the break room where all the other labor law posters are posted, with the name of the person blacked out.

    5. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      It is only a violation if you get caught. There is, and always has been, exactly $0 in the government budget for enforcement of the wage parity requirements of the H1B program.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    6. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      are you just stating the law or do you really BELIEVE this is how the real world works?

      I can assure you, the two are disjoint in almost all h1b salaries.

      do you ever wonder WHY HR wants to keep salaries secret?

      well, sometimes its not always a secret and the truth does get out.

      foreign workers are underpaid BY PLAN. not by mistake or by accident.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    7. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Rocketship+Underpant · · Score: 1

      "Shoot, half the time employers don't even pay citizens the US market average."

      At least your grasp of the meaning of "average" isn't too far off.

      --
      He who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me.
    8. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      You believe everything you are told, don't you? Anyone who has worked with H1-Bs know they make significantly less than the equivalent US worker. You're right, it is not supposed to work that way, but it does.

    9. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      are you just stating the law or do you really BELIEVE this is how the real world works? I can assure you, the two are disjoint in almost all h1b salaries.

      I know quite a few H1-Bs. All earn above average.

      Anyway, if the law isn't being enforced as intended, then, well, enforce it, don't bitch about H1-B being evil. The government sure does know the salaries - taxes get paid off them, after all.

    10. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by MikeB0Lton · · Score: 1

      Clearly you missed the humor in that... My experience in government has not been stellar.

    11. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, I am a former H1B, current Green Card applicant.
      I came to the US aged 22. Spent 6 years on H1B, have now been waiting on GC for 3 years. Will probably have it in 1 more year.
      I have colleagues who must now leave the country because they are being laid off and are still H1B. I have colleagues who are GC but are choosing to return back to India because they feel there is more opportunity there and they can be back close with family.

    12. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Sounds much like waiting for Social Security to decide on disability applications for SSDI and SSI. A person can expect about two years or more after applying. One does get two perfunctory denials and then waits for a hearing and decision. I first applied in late November 2006 and my hearing will be next week (March 2009). However, I still will need to wait for a decision after the hearing, hopefully it will take less than a month. Assuming I am successful in my appeal, I receive a lump sum of back benefits, portions of which go to various groups along the way that helped me. All and all, waiting two years for something that could easily have been decided in less than three months ends up costing Social Security more. Worse, delays like this for other disabled individuals cost society as a whole much more as well.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    13. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by sonofagunn · · Score: 1

      By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      By law maybe, but it reality, far from it. Employers use foreign contractors to save money, not because they can't find someone in the US at the "market average" price, but because they can find a foreign worker and illegally pay them less.

      That's another reason the smart ones may be leaving. They have priced themselves out of the market. The came over with dreams of making a nice "American" salary and are leaving disappointed. Companies want cheap labor.

    14. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

      It's the job insecurity that H1-B entails that is a problem.

      Even if all employers followed the law (which I do not believe to be the case based on my experience), H1-B visas still depress wages because now you have a pool of employees without the only leverage that that most employees have: the ability to quit.

      If people can't quit without risking deportation or the loss of green card opportunities, they are more likely to stay in place even if they are being paid below average (or stagnant wages). This will have, has had, a depressing effect on wages. Even stagnant wages will reduce the average wage (assuming growth in the field). Not to mention the other depressing effects from global competition from countries with lower costs of living. It's a bad time to be an employee.

      I recommend that engineers and software developers stop selling their future developments to employers in advance and so cheaply. We should begin to concentrate on how to own what we produce. (Yeah, I now. Pipe dream.)

    15. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, I'd just like to add that creating a class of employees that are guaranteed only the average wage also lessens the incentive for the rest of the field to work harder or be more innovative to compete because they will unlikely be rewarded for their efforts. Why work so hard if your wages are under pressure and being restricted to the average anyway?

      Work to keep what you make, and H1-B visas should be replaced with visas that at least allow at will employment like anybody else.

    16. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Even if all employers followed the law (which I do not believe to be the case based on my experience), H1-B visas still depress wages because now you have a pool of employees without the only leverage that that most employees have: the ability to quit.

      That's precisely what I meant by "job insecurity" in my original post. Fix that, and enforce the minimal wage law, and then it works as advertised.

      By the way, a good example of getting these things right (IMO) is Canada. Worker visa here is tied to the specific employer as well - can't work for anyone else on it (that's so you can't get into the country on an offer for a position for which there is short supply, and then immediately move to another one for which local workforce is available), but the visa does not immediately terminate if you leave your job - so even if you get laid off, you still get to stay in the country until it expires (which is normally a few months at least, if one is careful to extend the stay early), and can use that time to find another employer, and re-apply for a new visa for the new position. Of course, this means going through all the checks again (that you are paid enough, and that the employer had trouble finding any locals for the job), but that's fair.

    17. Re:If the playing field were level, ... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The government sure does know the salaries - taxes get paid off them, after all.

      However, the government does not know the work being performed. Surely you knew that?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  33. Higher degrees, my arse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yah, y'know, I've processed too many immigration applications. I call BS on 51% having Master's and 41% having PhD's. They do not. They have a degree, from a college somewhere, that pretends to be that, but it is not accredited and it is nowhere near real. You start asking these guys about the stuff their degree says they know and they have no answers.

  34. H1B's leaving by gravos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, one thing that no one ever bothered to mention is that they might be leaving BECAUSE they can't find good jobs here. A lot of the kids at the university I went to had to go back to their own countries after graduation, not because they wanted to, they love America. They can't find an employer willing to put up with all the BS that uncle sam requires so they can become citizens.

    Barriers to entry never help anybody. Uncle Sam, tear down this wall.

    1. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a close situation: completed a US Master in a US top engineering school and had been offered a highly qualified job opportunity in the US. They were willing to do all the H1B thing for me.

      However, H1B deadline in April and Master obtained in May means I can't apply in H1B Master Quota. I would need to refuse all the other jobs opportunities and gamble my life on a 50%/50% H1B random lottery. Even if chaos in life might be fun, it's a bit too much chaos for me (if only I was like Harvey Dent in Batman!)

      Result: even if I'm European and wanted to stay in the US (and contribute to a US company and pay US taxes), those immigrations laws will result in my US Master and myself going straight to Asia.

    2. Re:H1B's leaving by Udigs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, one thing that no one ever bothered to mention is that they might be leaving BECAUSE they can't find good jobs here. A lot of the kids at the university I went to had to go back to their own countries after graduation, not because they wanted to, they love America. They can't find an employer willing to put up with all the BS that uncle sam requires so they can become citizens. Barriers to entry never help anybody. Uncle Sam, tear down this wall.

      I guess you feel like the 4 or 6 years they spent in the university were too much trouble then, too? Or should we just hand out degrees to anyone who wants them? Of course not. It's the same deal with citizenship. The US doesn't just "hand it over" because it MEANS something. Just like it takes time and energy to get a degree, I think it's reasonable to expect something from those who want to be a part of the most powerful nation in the world.

    3. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. All we'll have left here is stupid Americans.

    4. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They would not find jobs there either. But bigger opportunities to start up, yes.

    5. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Get off of your high horse. It means shit.
      None of your ancestors came there and had to take any test. They just took stuff, and then separated from their original countries.
      Then they mixed up a non-culture of street grids filled with crap food stores, giant malls and tons of plastic fantastic double-standard facade in the cities, and one-road hick-towns of religious fundamentalist rednecks everywhere else.

      The time of the western empire(s)" is over. Like the roman empire, the Egyptians and other large empires. They always fall. It's just a matter of time.
      The next could be China and/or the Arabic countries. So one thing does not change: The world is fucked up anyway.

    6. Re:H1B's leaving by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't you think this just means that America will have fewer people but those people will be risk takers (and one suspects heart breakers too). Plus, they will be the lucky half of the risk takers. Plus they have a Masters.

      Sounds pretty badass to me.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:H1B's leaving by truesaer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're talking about employers here. They're often not willing to spend years and tens of thousands of dollars working on getting their employees green cards. The US system requires extensive work by the employer, not just the individual.

      And frankly, US citizenship is not so valuable that it should be dramatically harder to obtain than an EU, UK, or Australian citizenship. But it is.

    8. Re:H1B's leaving by californication · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The U.S. unemployment rate is rising, meaning there are fewer and fewer jobs available. You may be willing and able to contribute and pay taxes, but so are about 20 million other people in this country.

    9. Re:H1B's leaving by QuasiEvil · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or it's the ones who are forced to take the risk because more stable employment isn't interested in them as candidates...

    10. Re:H1B's leaving by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also, having a lot of education does not make one highly skilled. Especially younger workers without much experience thrown at jobs that treat technical people as commodities.

      Some of the best engineers I've known are highly educated people from China or India. However, some of the worst engineers I've met were also highly educated people from China or India...

    11. Re:H1B's leaving by SnapShot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I had karma points. Excellent post.

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    12. Re:H1B's leaving by M1rth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reverse is also true: a large number of US workers are consistently being looked over for being "overqualified" after being dumped onto the market in favor of more and more H1-B's the past few years.

      Consider the following: if you are married, if you have more than 5 years experience, you are more likely to (a) be fired and (b) be passed over for a "new grad" or H1-B.

      Why? Benefits and pay grade. H1-B's at companies like Microsoft have been the latest in a series of BELL-like maneuvers (look up Continental Can Co. and the "Bell Plan" if you want to understand how insidious this kind of behavior is) by major US firms.

      Up until they started announcing layoffs, Microsoft was pushing for more and more H1-B's. It's not that there weren't very qualified US workers applying for those jobs, but that they didn't want to pay the market wage for people with real experience when they could pay the H1-B's less AND get away with forcing the H1-B's to work 80-90 hour weeks because they wouldn't have family back home to complain about it.

      --
      If you can read this sig, congratulations, you have your glasses on!
    13. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I wish I had karma points

      Congratulations on fundamentally misunderstanding how Slashdot works.

    14. Re:H1B's leaving by Tassach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      THIS... after 20 years in IT, I've worked with a lot of H1B's. My experience has been that the bell curve of ability among immigrant workers seems to be inverted -- they tend to be either insanely talented or completely incompetent, with very little middle ground between the two.

      Standard disclaimers about confirmation bias and limited sample size apply.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    15. Re:H1B's leaving by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wonder if this is because of H1B hiring tendencies. Employers either go with H1B workers because they can't find someone as highly qualified locally as the foreign applicant; or because they want cheap labor.

      (granted it's not cheap to go through the H1B process, but if you've got a marginal worker who has to go through a mess of bureacracy to change jobs, you've essentially got indentured labor that you can exploit)

    16. Re:H1B's leaving by lcsjk · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      We have a stupid system here in the USA. Our taxes pay for their education and research and then we make it so hard to get a job that many have have to go back home, taking their tax paid education and expertise with them. Keep in mind that these students are the top 10 percent of all from China and India. I have been working with PhD students for 10 years, mostly Chinese and Indian, and so far, I have not found even one student that wants to return home without working for a few years in the USA. If we pay for their education, they should be REQUIRED to work in the US for a few years, yet we make it so hard to get H1-B visas that many end up going home. Sure, they raise the standard of living back home, and have good will for the US, but we are the losers. Uneducated yard workers can get visas almost as easily as the smartest students we educate. Sure, there are thousands of students, but just a drop in the bucket of the total of Visas. Make it easy for them to get visas and they will not have to work for lower wages than US citizens and we all will benefit. It is a stupid system.

    17. Re:H1B's leaving by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 5, Funny

      Filter your candidates for luck, you don't want unlucky people working for your company. Dump half the applications at random. Success!

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    18. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said.

    19. Re:H1B's leaving by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if your company sucks, so you only end up keeping the unlucky candidates?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    20. Re:H1B's leaving by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You'd be better off sending them on a team building trip and hiring psychos to kill half of them. That would select for a blend of luck and ass kicking ability which is essential, given that in the long run you want to replace your expensive consultant psychos with employed ones to cut down on the costs of team building trips.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:H1B's leaving by EvilNTUser · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not American, but that's ridiculous. You can go out and get any kind of insurance right now, but live without it for decades and try to get it when you become afraid of getting sick and it'll suddenly be a lot harder. It's the same thing.

      An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person. An adult immigrant from another country is a much larger risk, and many would show up just because they couldn't succeed in any other country either. You do not want to let those people in. It's ok to be selfish.

      Borders may be a "disease" in the future, but today the western world would be overwhelmed by people trying to escape poverty and only succeeding in bringing their misery with them. When we've fixed the third world*, THEN we can consider lofty goals like opening borders. Anyone who thinks abolishing them in the present is a good idea is really naive.

      *Or let it fix itself. Today's aid system is way too close to communism (and then people wonder why nothing is getting better).

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    22. Re:H1B's leaving by javiercero · · Score: 2

      "An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person. An adult immigrant from another country is a much larger risk, and many would show up just because they couldn't succeed in any other country either. You do not want to let those people in. It's ok to be selfish."

      Yeah right you are not an American. And I am the queen of Sada. LOL.

    23. Re:H1B's leaving by ziphnab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person.

      I'd hate to break it to you, but the rest of the world is a big place, and while you might consider yourself moraly superior to large parts of the world, that world (usualy people in that same large part that you feel superior to) considers what you feel is a 'decent person' to be a guntoting fanatic that's loud obnoxious and has an inflated sense of selfworth because he has been indoctrinated from birth that the US of A is the best.

      I'm not American

      And, like my neighbour, I also am the queen of Sheba

      --
      --- Sometimes even music cannot substitute for tears. --Paul Simon, Cool Cool River
    24. Re:H1B's leaving by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has it occurred to you that some people don't care much for nationalities at all? That for them, it is basically administrative hassle you go through?

      And that doesn't make them bad people, on the contrary: they probably just don't believe there is much of a link between geology and human qualities...

    25. Re:H1B's leaving by Cormacus · · Score: 1

      Its not just H1Bs - practically all of the international students (F1 visa?) at my college got the cold shoulder from employers at all the job fairs. Nobody wanted to sponsor.
      It makes no sense to train these folks up and then force them to leave. And then we wonder why competition from overseas in intellectual fields is growing . . .

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    26. Re:H1B's leaving by Cormacus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citizenship != Permanent Residency

      And are you suggesting that the "diversity visa lottery" expects something from the people who win visas? </heavy sarcasm>

      How about we instead give those highly trained individuals who have completed advanced degrees here the ability to stick around and work so that they have the opportunity to contribute to the USA?

      PS - if you were trolling, good job. You got me.

      PPS - if you really believe this, . . . you may not have personal experience with this issue. Or you're a jerk.

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    27. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how exactly do you plan on fixing the 3rd world then?

      Exporting the same system that got you* into the shit you're in now doesn't seem to work...

      *cause you are an American.

    28. Re:H1B's leaving by necro81 · · Score: 1

      What system of citizenship do you propose using instead? Are babies to not belong to the country of their birth? Do countries, borders, and governments not mean anything in this day and age?

    29. Re:H1B's leaving by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am not an American, and I wasn't referring to any kind of superiority or fear of terrorism. This is about risk. Risk increases with uncertainty.

      An infant has a probability distribution equal to infants of American parents, because it just came into being. Adult immigrants have motives and all kinds of selection pressures, even if their home country is better than America. (Of course, unscrupulous prospective immigrants might take advantage of their infant, but that's another issue.)

      For example (and I am NOT saying this is reality), immigrants may be more likely to be losers because being unable to make a living in your own country is a strong motive to move abroad. On the other hand, skilled people may want to move to America to get better salaries.

      Immigration policies must be based on an honest study of the motives of all types of prospective immigrants. This also doesn't mean that the current policy is perfect, but simply opening up all borders in the name of some ideal could be disastrous. Making naturalization hard is a legitimate idea for finding the most motivated people.

      Notice that open borders wouldn't really be good for the countries you think I look down on either. Every person who could leave would do so, leaving the least capable parts of society in their home country. The third world would never recover. The best way to help those countries is to give the smart people a reason to build up their own country instead of escaping to industrialized nations that already have environmentally unsustainable populations.

      In the mean time, I think your country (assuming you're American) has every right to pick and choose those it lets in.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    30. Re:H1B's leaving by computational+super · · Score: 1
      None of your ancestors came there and had to take any test.

      How do you know? He might be an H1B, or the child of an H1B (etc.), for all you know. My wife stood in line for citizenship just like she was supposed to, and nothing pisses her off more than hearing about blanket amnesty for illegal immigrants...

      They just took stuff, and then separated from their original countries.

      Actually, I think that was probably pretty hard, what with the malaria, and the no roads, and log cabins in the winter... way harder than taking a citizenship test.

      --
      Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    31. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad idea - they'll just end up on the Ringworld, leaving the unlucky employers here.

    32. Re:H1B's leaving by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Actually my ancestors came here as indentured servants to the Crown of England, forced to live and work in estates producing pine tar until they revolted in a quite violent fashion.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    33. Re:H1B's leaving by Dryth · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. I'm an H-1B in the process of moving back to Canada after four years spent in the US working for a fairly reputable tech company.

      For those unfamiliar with H-1Bs, the biggest problem is a lack of grace period. You're expected to leave the country literally the day you're no longer employed, which is rough in the case of a sudden layoff.

      In practice there's a 30 day unofficial grace period, but given the job market and typical turnaround time of a salary H-1B professional role, and need for visa sponsorship, you're basically out of luck. And if you're like me you spend any of that time in the US wondering when INS/DHS are going to beat down your door.

      The other option - apart from leaving the country - is filing for a visa transfer (e.g. to a B-2). But the estimated processing time is about three months. Apparently they give you a break if you can prove you mailed out your transfer in a timely fashion... but it can also cause problems when you attempt to transfer back to a work visa.

      In my case I left ASAP, leaving my entire apartment and its contents behind, paying my lease and bills remotely, and praying I can get a B-2 at the border when I hop down to package up my stuff.

      H-1Bs are honestly designed to prevent skilled workers from finding new employment in the US.

      (Disclaimer: Clearly IANAL - most of this comes second hand from my former immigration lawyer)

    34. Re:H1B's leaving by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up- this is happening to BOTH American and Immigrant recent graduates. Unfortunately, it's not Uncle Sam who built this barrier to entry- more like Auntie Fannie.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    35. Re:H1B's leaving by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      I work at a large state university. Less than half of our budget comes from taxes. Students from out of state, including Chinese and Indians, pay higher tuition than residents. In fact, we're actively recruiting international students because they pay their own way, whereas in-state students are a drain on our budget.

      Aside from that, and the yardworker visa comment, I pretty much agree with your post.

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
    36. Re:H1B's leaving by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      Our taxes pay for their education and research

      What? They do? I was under the impression that foreign students pay the same unsubsidized tuition that out-of-state and private college students pay.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    37. Re:H1B's leaving by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1
      That's certainly a nice patriotic position to take. However, I somewhat suspect that, in the long run, making the barrier to entry to citizenship very low is going to be better for our society, country, and probably world. I'd be happy to grant citizenship benefits to everyone who pays taxes. If you don't pay your taxes one year, you don't get to enjoy being a citizen that year.

      "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses..." That's what made us the greatest country historically. Why are we changing it?

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    38. Re:H1B's leaving by demonbug · · Score: 1

      Our taxes pay for their education and research

      What? They do? I was under the impression that foreign students pay the same unsubsidized tuition that out-of-state and private college students pay.

      When it comes to graduate school in the US it is very rare for any student in the sciences or engineering, foreign or domestic, to pay their own tuition (at least at larger research universities). It is nearly always paid for out of their advisor's grants or through support from the university/department (usually in exchange for an appointment as a TA or something).

      It is very different for professional schools (law school, medical school) and graduate students in the humanities (not usually a whole lot of support available) where students usually have to pay their way.

    39. Re:H1B's leaving by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but how many of these 20 million people are as highly educated and motivated as the poster above? Not very many.

      People like this Anonymous Coward are going to get a job. They are very employable. The question is whether they are going to work in the U.S. and pay U.S. taxes (and mortgages), or if they are going to take their expertise elsewhere and compete against Americans somewhere where the cost of living is much lower.

      The real problem that the U.S. has with outsourcing is that several countries have built up enough expertise in their own countries that they can actually compete with the U.S. I can compete with Indians and Chinese if they have to come to America to get the really good jobs. If the good jobs move overseas, however, because we won't let these highly educated people come here, then we are truly screwed.

    40. Re:H1B's leaving by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      Oh please. A highly educated foreigner is far more likely to be an asset to the U.S. than any random U.S. citizen.

      We aren't talking about people that came into this country illegally. We are talking about foreigners that came into this country legally and have received an advanced degree (probably at least partly at American taxpayer expense). These people are going to be positive contributors to any society where they end up, and we are pushing them out.

    41. Re:H1B's leaving by MMInterface · · Score: 1

      An infant born in America will grow up in an American cultural environment, and will have American probabilities for growing up to be a decent person.

      I'd hate to break it to you, but the rest of the world is a big place, and while you might consider yourself moraly superior to large parts of the world, that world (usualy people in that same large part that you feel superior to) considers what you feel is a 'decent person' to be a guntoting fanatic that's loud obnoxious and has an inflated sense of selfworth because he has been indoctrinated from birth that the US of A is the best.

      I'm not American

      And, like my neighbour, I also am the queen of Sheba

      Why is it hard to believe that he's not American? I mean with the world being such a big place like you say it is?

    42. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I think it would be cool to live in France or Sweden but guess what... I can't just move there and get a job....wunder why??? If we are going to have a global economy then let us have one. If not, we have to protect our jobs too.

    43. Re:H1B's leaving by obarel · · Score: 1

      I hire only lottery winners.

      Oh, wait...

    44. Re:H1B's leaving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why do you hate Americans so much?

    45. Re:H1B's leaving by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Our taxes pay for their education and research

      This isn't exactly correct, although it happens to some PhD applicants.

      Sometimes, they'll be awarded a fellowship (Ford Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, UNESCO, etc. Other times, their own government will give them their stipends, which might run over a 7 digit number in their local currency (because the US dollar is so overvalued).

      In none of these cases are the US people "paying for their education." Rather, the only currency that is being bought and paid is scientific research.

      So some of you'd guys better shut the f* up with the xenophobic arguments.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    46. Re:H1B's leaving by voxner · · Score: 1

      Consider the following: if you are married, if you have more than 5 years experience, you are more likely to (a) be fired and (b) be passed over for a "new grad" or H1-B.

      5 years of experience should surely count something. People usually "progress" in their career path. If you are replaced by a "new grad" either the management is making a mistake or you deserve it (for the sheer reason that its actually possible to replace you with a new grad inspite of 5 years of experience). There are many firms that exploit h1b but Microsoft is more likely interested in an expanded talent pool rather than lowering wages. Of course your whole post reeks of "they took our jobs" mentality but thats a different issue.

    47. Re:H1B's leaving by Splintax · · Score: 1

      The government has just as much of a 'right' to pick and choose the people it allows through its borders as your business has a 'right' to choose its employees. (Your employees are being paid by the business, not by you personally, right?) Rights are not exclusively held by people.

    48. Re:H1B's leaving by frederickroyceperez · · Score: 1

      What if your company sucks, so you only end up keeping the unlucky candidates?

      We thank you for your efforts !

  35. Re:Good riddance by carlzum · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm tired of the smell of curry.

    Oh no! The summary said PhDs and business managers were leaving, so I wasn't worried. But if the restaurant proprietors are going we have to act now. This is America, you can have your doctors and scientists, but for the love of God, don't take our food.

  36. Immigrants by russlar · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Ey took our jerbs!

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  37. Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by jeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, for the billionth time, we don't mind competing on quality. No, for the billionth time, we're not racist. No, for the billionth time, we don't mind the competition. On the contrary, my heart goes out to the H1-Bs I work with because I know they don't have any good choices.

    In the most brutal stark terms, H1-Bs are hired specifically because they don't enjoy the same political and legal protection that native workers do. They get paid less, worked like indentured servants, and disposed of like kleenex. I've actually heard one manager scream at the H1-B team he employed "If you're awake, you're working for me!"

    This is why you don't see the IT market flooded with French, Canadian or Australian workers, but rather see the market flooded with people from countries struggling with poverty and political horrors.

    These poor people are exploited here precisely because the conditions in their home country are so horrific. My heart goes out to the women H1-Bs I've worked with, because I've seen the haunted look in their eye when they speak of home. I once cornered another H1-B over a hideously unethical stunt he pulled to shift the blame away from his own screwup to another, more junior engineer. He robbed my righteous thunder when he got a desperate look in his eyes and pleaded with me, "Look, if he gets fired he can just get another job. If I get fired, they'd make me go back..."

    For the billionth time, if we need this talent, then let's do the right thing by these people and offer them citizenship. If we're not prepared to do the right thing, then we shouldn't be using them as scabs to break the back of American labor.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 0

      "Look, if he gets fired he can just get another job. If I get fired, they'd make me go back..."

      Ethics like that are the reason some cultures foster third-world shitholes.

    2. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Important note - it doesn't take CITIZENSHIP to prosper in another country, it only takes PERMANENT RESIDENCY. The latter frees the worker from indentured servitude without all of the political baggage involved in switching or augmenting citizenship

    3. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      You'll get no sympathy from me. First you describe an H1-B employee who's a screw-up ("a hideously unethical stunt he pulled to shift the blame away from his own screwup") and then you say that we need to keep people like him ("For the billionth time, if we need this talent, then let's do the right thing").

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

      ...He robbed my righteous thunder when he got a desperate look in his eyes and pleaded with me, "Look, if he gets fired he can just get another job. If I get fired, they'd make me go back...

      And this is a good thing for everyone except the unethical asshat. Well, maybe not for his future coworkers back in Elbonia.

    5. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's easy to behave ethically when your ass isn't on the line.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    6. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >They get paid less, worked like indentured servants,
      >and disposed of like kleenex. I've actually heard one
      >manager scream at the H1-B team he employed
      >"If you're awake, you're working for me!"

      Amen to that!

      I once worked at a place where I was only one of two US citizens in the trenches. All the rest were H1-Bs.

      The owner of the company took advantage of this and refused to give the typical holidays off. He figured if the H1-Bs didn't know about them, they wouldn't miss them.

      Of course, when I was told I couldn't have July 4th off, I told him it was un-American. After much to-do, the company finally declared it an official holiday, but I was a marked man after that.

      After demanding Thanksgiving off and winning another company wide holiday, I quit. The H1-Bs were on there own after that.

    7. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by BillAtHRST · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! One of the H1B's I worked with (great guy, really smart) HAD to live in company-provided housing (that was part of the deal).
      He was paid substantially less than market wages because he was in reality an "indentured servant", AND he paid back a substantial chunk of that in rent to his employers (a large Indian consulting co.).
      " You load sixteen tons, and what do you get? Another day older and deeper in debt. Saint Peter, don't you call me, 'cause I can't go; I owe my soul to the company store... "
      - Merle Travis, "Sixteen Tons"

    8. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by tempest69 · · Score: 1
      I've always disliked the whole H1-B, figuring it as a way to undermine the value of my education. Really this has changed my attitude,, I'd much rather have the H1-B's fast tracked to green card or citizenship. With a green card they can work for real cash which is good all around.. sure its a bit more cash they send back home. But it doesn't undermine my ability to charge for my skills as much.

      But really it's the fairness to the H1-B's. We should care about the conditions of the workers which produce our goods. Our purchases make us complicit in their treatment.

    9. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was thoughtful man. Well said.

    10. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Canadian and I am working in the US on an H1B visa, and believe me, I am not underpaid relative to my naturalized peers. I know lots of other Canadians who work in the U.S. on H1B, some on TN, but the bottom line is, the reason why many Canadians don't work in the US is because conditions in Canada aren't that bad at all... You tend to see people from poorer countries because they can actually achieve a significantly higher quality of life in the U.S. While I am paid more here than I probably could make for similar work in Canada, I don't know if my quality of life is that much better. My parents are Italian immigrants, they came because conditions in Italy were terrible after the war. Not many Italians immigrate anymore either for the same reason Canadians don't.

    11. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      indentured servants

      That's exactly the term that's been in my mind. But,indentured servants get their freedom if they and their employer play by the rules.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    12. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Moral courage is hard. However, claiming that it's hard is insufficuent reason to not be ethical.

    13. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, for the billionth time, we don't mind competing on quality. No, for the billionth time, we're not racist. No, for the billionth time, we don't mind the competition. On the contrary, my heart goes out to the H1-Bs I work with because I know they don't have any good choices.

      Um, not really. If you get some H1B Indian saying that he doesn't have good choices back home then you can safely laugh on his face. We have planty of good choices back home especially with the offshoring business. It's just that we get a lot more money when we work in the US. Imagine 5 guys working for a year in the US, sharing an apartment, eating home-made food and generally saving up as much as they can. From what I have been told by ex-colleagues, they could save up to a million Indian Rupees (roughly 20,000 USD) in a year. While that won't be much in the US, it is enough to build oneself a decently big house in India.

      It is not helplessness, it's a choice they have made. Conditions are not poor in India (can't speak for China, etc.), especially if you are well educated and have the capacity to go abroad to study/work. In fact, it is generally the upper middle classes in India who get the opportunity to go abroad to study/work, so they really have not seen any "horrific" conditions back home.

    14. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am on H1B and going through green card process. This being modded insightful is fucking ridiculous.

      They get paid less, worked like indentured servants, and disposed of like kleenex?

      What the fuck are you talking about? H1B's are supposed to get paid more than the prevailing wages and do get paid on par with my more senior developer co-workers.

      This is why you don't see the IT market flooded with French, Canadian or Australian workers, but rather see the market flooded with people from countries struggling with poverty and political horrors.

      Political horror? I come from India and there are no political horrors. What the fuck?

      You see one case of H1B and think that is the reality? Go back to your hole and stay there.

    15. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GP totally got played by the H1Bs, especially the "unethical" one. "Oh, the horrors of foreigncountryland, please please please don't send me back there!" Americans have some strange ideas about what the rest of the world is like.

    16. Re:Claiming racism and laziness is a cheap shot by illtud · · Score: 1

      These poor people are exploited here precisely because the conditions in their home country are so horrific. My heart goes out to the women H1-Bs I've worked with, because I've seen the haunted look in their eye when they speak of home. I once cornered another H1-B over a hideously unethical stunt he pulled to shift the blame away from his own screwup to another, more junior engineer. He robbed my righteous thunder when he got a desperate look in his eyes and pleaded with me, "Look, if he gets fired he can just get another job. If I get fired, they'd make me go back..."

      And this is how it starts... Unrest is coming, it isn't going to be just, and it isn't going to be pretty. Belin circa 35.

  38. Extremely misleading article by hemp · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article is extremely misleading and makes you think that these companies may have been started by people that came to the US on H1-B visas

    They never break out the number of immigrants who come to the US on H1-B visas that start technology companies (H1-B is of course a temporary non-immigration visa).

    Google was started by Sergey Brin who was a Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union whose family immigrated to the US when he 6 and Larry Page of Lansing Michigan.

    Andy Grove of Intel fame was a Jewish refugee who fled post WWII Europe to the US (Gordon Moore was born in San Fran and Robert Noyce born in Iowa however, where the actual founders of Intel).

    Pierre Omidyar of eBay of course is a Frenchman who moved to this country with his family when he was 6 years old.

    Yahoo! founded by David Filo ( cheese head from Wisconsin) and Jerry Yang who came to this country with his family when he 10 from Taiwan.

    None of these people came to the US on work visas.

    This article is reprinted by Business Week & Wall Street Journal every year close to the May deadline for H1-B visas.

    In May, there will be an article about how the 85,000 visas were snapped up in one day due to "shortages" amongst technology and science workers and how we need to have unlimited H1-B visas to fix this problem.

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:Extremely misleading article by cmdrcoffee · · Score: 1

      Andy Grove of Intel fame was a Jewish refugee who fled post WWII Europe to the US (Gordon Moore was born in San Fran and Robert Noyce born in Iowa however, where the actual founders of Intel).

      Pierre Omidyar of eBay of course is a Frenchman who moved to this country with his family when he was 6 years old.

      Yahoo! founded by David Filo ( cheese head from Wisconsin) and Jerry Yang who came to this country with his family when he 10 from Taiwan.

      None of these people came to the US on work visas.

      What about student visas? What about the students that came to study in the US, obtained bachelors and masters degrees, and then were denied to work in the US?

    2. Re:Extremely misleading article by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article is extremely misleading and makes you think that these companies may have been started by people that came to the US on H1-B visas

      They never break out the number of immigrants who come to the US on H1-B visas that start technology companies (H1-B is of course a temporary non-immigration visa).

      However, they DO break out the percentage of returnees that are H1B/temporary - 1/5th of chinese and 1/2 of the indians. That means that 4/5ths of the chinese and half of the indian returnees had green-cards or full citizenship.

    3. Re:Extremely misleading article by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      They can go back to China and hang out with all the other unemployed Ph.D.s.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Extremely misleading article by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      H1-B is of course a temporary non-immigration visa

      This is rather misleading. While H1-B is not an "immigration visa", but it is one of the few that permit the holder to have "intent to immigrate" (for example, a visitor visa does not - and if you file for immigration as a visitor, you get kicked out immediately), and that's quite deliberate.

    5. Re:Extremely misleading article by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      The problem posed by the article is the same that you mention... that these temorary visas are depriving us of potential innovators.

      This is not the same article we see very year.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Extremely misleading article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > H1-B visas that start technology companies

      could that be because those under H1-Bs would face the prospect of losing their jobs if they started a side business - and if they lose their jobs, they end up having to return to their native countries?

      anyone under H1-B would have to wait it out under indentured servitude for 6ish years and then - if they haven't burnt out by then by the 80 hours/week regiment - would they even have any realistic shot at striking out on their own.

    7. Re:Extremely misleading article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only thing missing here would be a bunch of links to the wall street journal and business week for the articles in may from 2003 until today, to support your claim that it happens every year.

    8. Re:Extremely misleading article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you have not met any of those H1-B immigrant's kid(s). I work with lot of Asians (first gen immigrants) and get chance to meet some of those bright kids, and I can bet that they are 200% better than other American kids. They represent future of the country (any country they will reside). Look at public schools and compare them with some of high end private schools. Asian folks are spending 25% to 40% of their earnings in getting their kids educated at best of places. Look at SAT scores, look at elite schools and you will see that Asians are dominating most of the places. I agree that most of H1-B folks won't become big time entrepreneurs, but some of those kids sure will.

    9. Re:Extremely misleading article by RyansPrivates · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more! This article is EXTREMELY flawed in logic and cogency. ALL of the reported figures in section one pointed to the fact that these emigrants were returning home for personal and family reasons. Their own respondent data says that visas were NOT the problem. Yet somehow the authors have made the leap to: "In summary, if the U.S. Government and the business community could find better ways to offer good jobs in tandem with less restrictiveness in visa policies for talented immigrants, the U.S. might be able to recapture many of these immigrants and their potential to serve as a much needed growth engine for the U.S. economy." The authors used an admittedly unsupported premise as the foundation of their conclusion, "Although visa problems did not surface as the primary factor in losing these talented immigrants, a significant minority of respondents did indicate visa and residency permit issues as having played a role in their decision to return to their home country." This is the most poorly structured argument they could have possibly put together. This is purely political diatribe masquerading as a research paper from prominent institutions. Gosh I miss responsible journalism...

      --
      If at first you don't succeed... How does that go again? Ah, forget it.
  39. Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, et by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, Businesses, And More
    Friday, 27 Feb 2009 | 4:39 PM ET
    Posted By: Larry Kudlow

    Let me be very clear on the economics of President Obama's State of the Union speech and his budget.

    He is declaring war on investors, entrepreneurs, small businesses, large corporations, and private-equity and venture-capital funds.

    That is the meaning of his anti-growth tax-hike proposals, which make absolutely no sense at all -- either for this recession or from the standpoint of expanding our economy's long-run potential to grow.

    Raising the marginal tax rate on successful earners, capital, dividends, and all the private funds is a function of Obama's left-wing social vision, and a repudiation of his economic-recovery statements. Ditto for his sweeping government-planning-and-spending program, which will wind up raising federal outlays as a share of GDP to at least 30 percent, if not more, over the next 10 years.

    RELATED LINKS

    Current DateTime: 03:39:08 03 Mar 2009
    LinksList Documentid: 29434273

            * Obama Walking Tightrope On Banks Bailout
            * Obama Vs Reagan
            * Americans Mixed On Obama's Budget
            * What's In Obama's Budget

    This is nearly double the government-spending low-point reached during the late 1990s by the Gingrich Congress and the Clinton administration. While not quite as high as spending levels in Western Europe, we regrettably will be gaining on this statist-planning approach.

    Study after study over the past several decades has shown how countries that spend more produce less, while nations that tax less produce more. Obama is doing it wrong on both counts.

    And as far as middle-class tax cuts are concerned, Obama's cap-and-trade program will be a huge across-the-board tax increase on blue-collar workers, including unionized workers. Industrial production is plunging, but new carbon taxes will prevent production from ever recovering. While the country wants more fuel and power, cap-and-trade will deliver less.

    The tax hikes will generate lower growth and fewer revenues. Yes, the economy will recover. But Obama's rosy scenario of 4 percent recovery growth in the out years of his budget is not likely to occur. The combination of easy money from the Fed and below-potential economic growth is a prescription for stagflation. That's one of the messages of the falling stock market.

    Essentially, the Obama economic policies represent a major Democratic party relapse into Great Society social spending and taxing. It is a return to the LBJ/Nixon era, and a move away from the Reagan/Clinton period. House Republicans, fortunately, are 90 days sober, as they are putting up a valiant fight to stop the big-government onslaught and move the GOP back to first principles.

    Noteworthy up here on Wall Street, a great many Obama supporters -- especially hedge-fund types who voted for "change" -- are becoming disillusioned with the performances of Obama and Treasury man Geithner.

    There is a growing sense of buyer's remorse.

    Well then, do conservatives dare say: We told you so?

  40. Management? by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 5, Funny

    They were highly educated, with degrees in management...

    So that's our plan for destroying the world!

  41. Colleges are getting gutted as well by Dhrakar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is also important to note that for many colleges and universities, foreign nationals make up a large portion of the student body _and_ the faculty in several departments. As these highly talented folks go back, they leave big holes in the departments they leave behind. I think that if all the FNs left our petroleum engineering, for example, department the place would be a ghost town.
       

    1. Re:Colleges are getting gutted as well by winwar · · Score: 1

      " think that if all the FNs left our petroleum engineering, for example, department the place would be a ghost town."

      Which means that we are producing too many graduates for the jobs. Which means we could probably do without many faculty members.

      Of course reducing faculty isn't going to happen....

    2. Re:Colleges are getting gutted as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no problem. in most US public schools (at least in Florida) you can teach outside your specialty for at least a couple of years. since they've been gutting liberal arts budgets for years, all those english, psychology and anthropology profs can go fill in in the math and science departments for a while.

    3. Re:Colleges are getting gutted as well by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      What?

      That just sortof implies the grads generally would rather be in industry, which is perfectly reasonable.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  42. Kewl! More work for smart local companies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kewl! More work for smart local companies!

    Except, that I want to leave here too before all my money is transfered to people who don't work half as hard as I did to earn it.

    Anyone in Argentina hiring technical architects with 20 yrs of experience? If you are, I'm there!

  43. It should be a two-way street by jeko · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a basic matter of fairness, if Indian and Chinese citizens are going to be free to work in the United States, then US citizens should be free to work in India and China.

    The problem is they're not. Some out-of-work disgruntled geek published an article looking into this a while back. The Indian consulate just laughed at him when he inquired about being allowed to work in India, while the Chinese representatives haughtily told him that Chinese jobs were for Chinese citizens.

    They can't have it both ways. The Indians and the Chinese cannot argue that their citizens should be allowed to compete world-wide, but that jobs inside their own borders are only open to native citizens.

    It's not just faulty logic. It's raging hypocrisy.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:It should be a two-way street by TheSync · · Score: 1

      The Indians and the Chinese cannot argue that their citizens should be allowed to compete world-wide, but that jobs inside their own borders are only open to native citizens.

      However just because other countries are stupidly keeping their economies from maximum growth by cutting off the ability to hire the best people for the job doesn't mean the US should do so.

    2. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why can't they have it both ways? It's their country, they can do what they want with it, and so can you with yours. You're not letting them into your country as a token of goodwill. It's beneficial to your country to allow immigration. If they don't reciprocate, that's their problem. Besides, you wouldn't want to work for their wages anyway...

    3. Re:It should be a two-way street by drizek · · Score: 1

      We don't let ferriners work in America as a favor to them. We do it because we need them. They don't need or want us.

    4. Re:It should be a two-way street by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      However just because other countries are stupidly keeping their economies from maximum growth by cutting off the ability to hire the best people for the job doesn't mean the US should do so.

      Bingo! Brain drain is good for the drainer, not the drainee. If they want to encourage brain-drain with no way to refill their own brain-bucket, then I am 100% down with that.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    5. Re:It should be a two-way street by californication · · Score: 1

      Americans don't need them, Americans businesses need them. What good does filling U.S. businesses with the most qualified foreign workers do for the average American if they end up having to take a pay cut or end up being unemployed due to a saturated job market?

    6. Re:It should be a two-way street by mochan_s · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember that slashdot article.

      But, the guy who wrote the article had no intention of actually getting a job in India or China. He was just trying to get somebody to say something stupid at the consulate.

      Actually, if you work for a Chinese company, they will put out a press release to the local media that their company is so great that even American want to work for them (it did happen! though it was for a student who was working at a Chinese factory - not really for wages but for experience).

    7. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You are wrong. The process in India and China is similar - you apply for a work visa and if approved (same as here) you are allowed to work.

    8. Re:It should be a two-way street by Libertarian001 · · Score: 1

      Who cares if it's raging hypocrisy? If they have talented, smart, hard-working people in competitive fields that want to come work in the U.S., then let's let them come here and stay for as long as they like.

    9. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Source of this claim, please? Several companies in India employ foreigners, usually at top positions. So while the number of westerners working in India is nowhere near that of Indians in the US or the UK, I don't think India has been discouraging outsiders from working here. It is just that the economics does not work out very well for outsiders. So they don't come.

      We have millions of illegal immigrants from countries like Bangladesh and Nepal entering India to work. They often end up staying over. But Indians do not go there to work. Why? You get better money in India, not Bangladesh or Nepal.

    10. Re:It should be a two-way street by thej1nx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or instead of hypocrisy, it is sheer xenophobia and mis-information at work. Clueless much? Apparently Indian companies do hire non-Indians. http://infotech.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1832596.cms Obviously, these folks did apply for a work permit and got one. Thing is, that most US citizens are generally only all talk about actually going to India to work. Just empty talk. It is a third world country. Period. Even if you were earning well by Indian standards(which most foreigners working in India do) you will still be dealing with mosquitoes, scorching Indian heat in summers, dirt, grime, infections, what not. India is all fun to visit as a tourist, but living there when you are a US citizen? Forget it. Think of queues 4-5 hours long, for almost everything. Indians are used to this "way of life". You as a pampered, spoiled US citizen are not. You will start cribbing about the dirt from day one. Your body has never encountered the diseases and bacterias flourishing there. Indians have developed a natural immunity. You will either have really watch what you drink and eat, or fall sick constantly. And the country is mostly conservative. Your chances of a relationship with a membership of the opposite sex are remote, unless she is interested in hooking onto your US citizenship as a wife. And all this, when your pay is in the upper brackett, allowing you to afford an air-conditioner at home at least, a car, good medical care, to compensate for some of the things you took for granted in USA. Such high-paying jobs are scarce. Being used to the US life, you are just not really in a position to survive on an actual average Indian salary. So far, it has been unthinkable that any average american would want to work in India for long-term, unless he was being ordered to, by his employer, or unless he was unaware what he was getting into, or unless he was a glutton for punishment, or all of above. If you are still game, get an Indian company to hire you first. If you are a good bargain for the value they will get, then business is business. There is no real bias against foreigners, especially if they deal with software export or US clients, in which case you might be even desirable for interfacing with their US clients. They will sponsor your Indian work permit. The procedure involved lots of red-tape but not impossible either. I personally know tons of Japanese folks working in India for example, for Indian companies that deal with Japanese companies. But please tone down the misinformation and xenophobia. It is becoming too much an american stereotype.

    11. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is totally untrue. You could google yourself and see how many Americans have been working in China without a work visa. The "Work visa" is a fairly new concept just instituted recently in China, but there is no quota or limitation. As long as you get a job, you can get the work permit. You don't need to wait years either.

    12. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet, they have the gall to call anyone who disagrees with the H-1B program a racist.

    13. Re:It should be a two-way street by Atario · · Score: 1

      This also applies to the big scary "protectionism" people are also frightened of in this thread. These types keep saying having protectionism in place only hurts you, but China and India have classic protectionist policies in place, and seem to be doing amazingly well compared to us, considering how we've essentially gutted ours and are now swirling the drain.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    14. Re:It should be a two-way street by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who did he talk to? I know several people working in China.

    15. Re:It should be a two-way street by FuryG3 · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you read that article, but it's total bullshit (if it even exists).

      Quick searching online reveals tons of info on getting a work visa in both China and India, as well as success stories. I personally know people who have traveled to and worked in China teaching English (commercially).

      China's program is called a Z-Visa: http://www.ehow.com/how_2365046_get-work-visa-china.html

      India's Employment Visa: http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview/id/597004.html

  44. Re:Let them go by forgoil · · Score: 1

    I would assume that "Real US Citizen" means born in the US since what you become when you get a citizenship is a naturalized citizen.

  45. So long and don't let the door hit you... by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 0

    I appreciate foreign students for supporting our schools with their tuition.

    I also appreciate them going back home to work, rather than hanging around here on H1-Bs at lower pay than American citizens would tolerate.

    *NO* H1-B workers should be allowed to remain in the US when unemployment is high in their corresponding industries.

  46. Isn't that the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To make dumber US citizens more employable? Esp in this environment.
    The only reason there's any tariff or restriction in trade in goods or employees is because local produce is inferior and/or more expensive (usually both to make imports attractive). You never see the US complain about its successful exports and ask foreign countries to restrict importing them.

  47. Enjoy your part of it! by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    ....

  48. sounds like a good argument for more immigration by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I'm sure most of those H1-B's would apply for regular green cards, without the disadvantages you cite, if it were possible to get one without winning a long-odds lottery.

  49. it's pretty much common knowledge by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Informative

    PhD students in the sciences and engineering do not pay for their education. Nearly 100% of them are funded in one way or another, whether it's fellowships, research assistantships, or teaching assistantships.

    1. Re:it's pretty much common knowledge by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      Uh not entirely true there, I realize you said nearly 100% but I'm paying for my education as a PhD student. Point is, every university works differently. If anything the land grants are getting less and less money from the state governments which are supposed to support them than they used to.

      Of course the funding for my research came from Peru and I'm an American citizen though. Most of the funding for fellowships, assistantships, etc. come through grants nowadays, not the government.

    2. Re:it's pretty much common knowledge by manastungare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      +1 for Trepidity.

      I'm a Ph.D. student in Computer Science. I have been fully funded all through my academic career here in the US at Georgia Tech and Virginia Tech. The same is the case with many (but not 100%) students getting Masters and Ph.D.s in Computer Science that I know of. There usually are a few paid assistantship positions that require security clearance, but most basic and applied research is not confidential.

      The funding isn't just a giveaway, of course -- I have to work for it and show results in return for the money from the NSF. As a symbiotic advantage, I get an advanced degree in the process.

      Empirical evidence, though, and I don't know where I might find a citation for you.

    3. Re:it's pretty much common knowledge by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it's either through the research agencies from their own countries or via grants and fellowships awarded through foundations (Rockefeller, Ford, UNESCO, etc.). None of these are "American taxpayer's money", I'd say...

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  50. No melting pot, only Identity Politics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, one of the political parties has worked very hard since the 60s to end the American Melting Pot.
    You can't have Identity Politics if everyone is melted together.
    No you need to divide everyone up. Into African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Latinos/Chicanos/Hispanics, Female-Americans, Homosexual-Americans, etc. etc.
    Of course to properly use Identity Politics you need some group to play the role of Der Juden. That has been the White Hetro-Sexual Male. That is the one 50% group it has been OK to hate.
    Identity Politics works so well in the Marxist Victim/Oppressor worldview.
    Works so well to breakdown the social cohesion of a civilization.
    Works so well to teach hate. The right kind of politically correct hate.

    America no longer has a Melting Pot. At most we are a Patchwork Quilt.

    1. Re:No melting pot, only Identity Politics by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

      wooooosh!

      --
      I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
  51. Slow visa processing is old by OFnow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Suggesting that slow visa processing began last November is just silly. That has been old news for years. Getting to the US to give a class, lecture, concert, or to go to school is much much more difficult than it was before Bush, and before 9/11. It's really bad for the US, for innovation, and for everyone, really, but it is old news.

    1. Re:Slow visa processing is old by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      No kidding. You can't even arrive on the visa waiver program anymore without applying beforehand for a travel authority. You need to do this even if you aren't actually going to the US, but you merely transit or change to another plane in a US airport! Argh!

  52. Re:good riddance by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah I saw that commercial too. The Germans always make good stuff.

  53. Re:Good riddance by getnate · · Score: 0

    I think he means smelling your co-workers' food.

  54. Re:Let them go by orielbean · · Score: 1

    I am removing your Foreigner Belt privileges

  55. Nice Article ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the Article. So let me get this straight the US Lead and economy has been maintained by immigrants. The US citizens are not pulling the load. If we let these people leave they will take their knowledge with them and we will not be able to do high tech work any more.
        They can here for the cash. The Cash is gone so they are leaving. The Rest is a load of Bull.
        As far as them taking the stuff they learn home, Is assume that is assume in the current application of H1-B.
        Is the US economy helped by immigrants. of course. It is defendant of them so much that we need to pay them to stay and figure out how to get as many more here as we can, you are kidding.

  56. Re:Let them go by Fourpole · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Presumably, most of those people originally wanted to become "real" (is there any other kind?) US citizens as well, but realized they have to jump through too many hoops for it to be worth it.

    I don't know about that. I live in a city with a high number of educated workers on a visa, and I know a lot of graduate students that will be looking for work on a visa. With a couple of exceptions, they are all pretty adamant about maintaining their citizenship and staying here on a visa only. The reasons vary, but most of them don't want to give up that part of their identity.

    Of course this is all anecdotal, but in my experience the majority of the educated immigrants are here for the education and job opportunities, not to stay here permanently.

  57. Re:Good riddance by carlzum · · Score: 1

    I understood the troll's intent. I was just countering his insult by saying most Americans love the food and culture new immigrants bring to our country, more so than work skills.

  58. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever the case, i think you need to get your hearing checked, because you completely missed that huge WHOOSH'ing sound of the GP's subtle joke flying WAY over your head...

  59. What about Emmigration? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    What are the smart Americans doing? Are Americans leaving the US at the same rate as before or in increasing numbers?

  60. Um, guys? by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    Hate to break it to you but this is not a new trend.

    "Back in the good olde days" it was an honor to have your children born in america, only to return to your home country (Especially a european country).

    Ever since before the USA was formed, people got an education over here or came here for foreign study, only to return home.

    Did you think it only worked the other way around?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
  61. Also stopping people from entering by definate · · Score: 1

    I think this is bad, however they are also stopping them getting in. I've a degree in programming and a masters in business. I've always wanted to go to the US to work, however I've been having trouble finding a viable way to get in.

    To enter using a job, I first need to find someone willing to employ a candidate from over here (Australia), or I need to take substantial risk and quit my job, take a holiday over there, apply for positions, and when I get one, then come back, get the visa for it, and then go back to the US.

    It becomes increasingly difficult for skilled people to enter. I hang out with a group of people who have good degrees in electronics, petroleum engineering, programming, economics, management and similar, all of which would love to go to the US, however most of which would find it hard.

    It's not the lack of jobs, it's the difficulty navigating the system. Also, I've had trouble finding out exactly how to do it. I believe the only way is for me to apply for a job, then get them to sponsor me, then fly to Sydney to get the visa (I'm in Adelaide), then fly to the US to work.

    Has anyone had any experience doing this? I'd love to find out the best way to get in, and similar. Any information is much appreciated.

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Also stopping people from entering by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

      You think it's hard coming here, you should try immigrating to Australia.

      Anyway, call back when we have 4% unemployment again.

    2. Re:Also stopping people from entering by definate · · Score: 1

      Hah yeah, good point. Which is one thing you have going for you, you are still quite a liberal country, even compared to similar countries like Canada, Australia, Britain, and similar.

      Another reason why I want to go there!

      I'm willing to deal with less employment, less wages, and similar. So I'll keep trying.

      Don't come to Australia man, you'll regret it. We're great for a holiday, but not to stay.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    3. Re:Also stopping people from entering by definate · · Score: 1

      Hey, our Government censors t-shirts. (A teenager was arrested for wearing a "Jesus is a cunt" t-shirt)

      I work with a fair few American's, and I've asked them about this, some of them are really Christian, and even the Texas guy and the New Jersey guy (both are really religious), said it was ridiculous that he was arrested and that he should sue the Government. Though, both of them did say, I could see him getting his ass handed to him.

      Australia may have been better regulatory, however the 80s was a nightmare here, since late 70s and early 80s politicians went crazy regulating our country, and set our country back heaps. Though, I believe it was more liberal with regards to immigration.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:Also stopping people from entering by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Australia is equally difficult to get into, I'll grant you that. But the difference is, Australia has a nice government website that you plug a few details in and it tells you exactly what visas you can try to apply for and a step by step approach to do it, including PDFs of all the forms you'll need etc: http://www.immi.gov.au/

      On the other hand, trying to navigate the US government's immigration website(s) is a nightmare. There's no simple, step by step guide to what to do. It's just a mess of random forms and information about various visas which may or may not apply to your situation.

      PS. This might have changed, but I'm going on the investigation I did a couple of years ago when I looked into moving from Australia to the US myself in order to marry my US girlfriend. It seemed to complicated, so in the end, she actually immigrated to Australia and we now live here.

  62. Re:good riddance by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone knows that the Germans invented everything important

    Like those ShamWow towels! :D They're made in Germany, and you know the Germans make good stuff. Just ask Vince! He won't steer you wrong. :)

    --
    Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
  63. Maybe They Can Retrain for Another Job? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    precisely the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the US economy

    Considering the current state of the ecomony, and now knowing those who made it what it is; I fail to see the problem.

  64. You must be a liberal arts major :-) by jeko · · Score: 5, Funny

    I conclude that you pulled that figure out of your ass.

    Most people start college at 17 or 18. Eighteen plus four equals twenty-two, at least it does in my corner of the universe. I know I graduated college at twenty-two. Twenty-two or twenty-three plus seven years lands you in the neighborhood of thirty, again, for most values of thirty.

    Does the math work differently when it comes out of your ass? Perhaps you don't realize it's not customary to take seven years to finish an undergrad degree?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:You must be a liberal arts major :-) by whoever57 · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you need to re-read what you posted. Let me quote:

      The average age at which H1-Bs come to this country is fresh out of college

      As I said, if (as you claim -- see above) the average at which they arrive is "fresh out of college", then approximately half must arrive on H1-B visas before graduating.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:You must be a liberal arts major :-) by ThunderThor53 · · Score: 1

      Except that H1-Bs are supposed to be for skills that are not available in the US. Even with the dearth of Science Technology Engineering and Math (STEM) graduates in the US, are bachelor- and masters-level skills with no work experience truly unavailable?

    3. Re:You must be a liberal arts major :-) by Jay+L · · Score: 1

      As I said, if (as you claim -- see above) the average at which they arrive is "fresh out of college", then approximately half must arrive on H1-B visas before graduating.

      No.

      Hint: The vast majority of people have an above-average number of legs.

      Answer: You're assuming a normal distribution.

    4. Re:You must be a liberal arts major :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint: The vast majority of people have an above-average number of legs.

      Yes, but "the vast majority" is not normally the same as "average". The normal meaning of "average" is either "arithmentic mean" or "median". As you rightly point out, the average (arithmetic mean) number of legs amongst the population is slightly below two. Using the definition on this page, the median number of legs amongst the population would be 1. Any further comparison with counting legs is not useful because the number of legs that people have has a very small range of discrete numbers.

      So let's look at all three definitions of "average". Firstly, let's assume that the "years out of college at which people get H1's" has a lower bound of zero.

      Arithmetic mean: Since there is a significant population of people who get H1-b's some years or even decades out of college, this will obviously set the arithmentic mean to be something more than zero.
      Median: People get H1-Bs up to probably 40 years out of college, so the median value would be around 20
      Mode: as I mentioned earlier, it is possible that the largest population of people who get H1-bs are zero years out of college. But I don't believe this to be true and another poster cited a webpage that supported my position.

      Now, if anyone would like to take my comments above and explain exactly why I am wrong, rather than just making the claim that I am wrong without any relevant and specific explanation, I welcome it. Otherwise, I will persist in my claim that the average age at which people get H1-B visas is not "fresh out of college".

      One final note. The OP actually referred to the "age at which H1-bs come into the country". Since people can come into the country on a student visa and then transfer to an H1-B, some did come into the country before graduating (although most student visa are awarded for postgraduate study). This fact is, however, not relevant to the discussion, since the original point was 22 or 23 years old plus 7 years. The 7 years being the max on an H1-b (23 or 23 being an expected age for first degree graduation). Those 7 years would apply to the time of granting the H1-b, so the original poster was wrong. In other words, if the average age at which people on H1-bs leave is around 30, I contend that the average time they spent on an H1-B was probably significantly less than 7 years. More likely 3-5 years, perhaps less even.

    5. Re:You must be a liberal arts major :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Perhaps you don't realize it's not customary to take seven years to finish an undergrad degree?"

      Perhaps not, but it sure is more fun!

      Damn. I should've been taking that exam right now instead of trolling slashdot...

  65. America = The World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our new paper, "America's Loss Is the World's Gain"...

    Great, now confused Americans will be wondering how their loss can be their gain.

  66. Re:Let them go by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    Well, not exactly. THEY can make more. If we make them, they're not foreigners.

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  67. You get no argument from me. by jeko · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, if you can look to the sky and speak with your heart that "All men should be free," then you're an American and we should make you a citizen.

    What we have now is institutionalized exploitation, and it's a stain on our national character.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  68. Why don't we ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... give them their PhD and their citizenship at the same time? If someone came here from another country long enough to earn their PhD, they've already worked here for somewhere around 5-7 years. Why do we make it more difficult for them to stay longer?

    Add to that the fact that most grant funding agencies only give grants to citizens, and it isn't hard to figure out why so many people who come here for their PhD from other countries end up leaving afterwards - they finished their PhD and then ran straight into a career roadblock of no fault their own.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Why don't we ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... give them their PhD and their citizenship at the same time? If someone came here from another country long enough to earn their PhD, they've already worked here for somewhere around 5-7 years. Why do we make it more difficult for them to stay longer?

      I just want to say that we really shouldn't be giving citizenship that easily. You do have a point, but we could be giving them green cards. A permanent residency visa is just as good in terms of working and living in the country.

      The reason I think we need to maintain the requirements for a written test for citizenship is that citizens get additional rights than just living here. They get to vote, they get to hold official positions (except for President and Vice-President). Don't get me wrong, I don't think there's anything wrong with foreigners achieving these requirements, but I do want them to understand what it means to be American, and to learn our history before they do so.

      And yes, I think natural-born Americans need to learn these lessons as well. Most naturalized citizens know a lot more about American history than the natural born citizens, as part of what they were required to learn to become citizens. That's not a tribute to the naturalized population, it's instead a shameful situation for the ignorant natural born citizens.

    2. Re:Why don't we ... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      A permanent residency visa is just as good in terms of working and living in the country.

      In terms of science funding, it isn't.

      If you have a PhD and you want federal funding for your research, almost without exception you must be a citizen. Of course the citizenship requirement doesn't apply if you want to work for someone else, but to truly advance your research in academia, you need to at some point have funding of your own.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  69. Completely Untrue by sanman2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's a fiction that's been repeated endlessly, like an urban myth. There are indeed managers from Western countries who live and work in India. Look at IBM, Cisco, Accenture -- they have plenty of Western managers there onsite in India. I had a friend at IBM whose division was being downsized, and IBM offered him a chance to resettle in India. He didn't take it, but obviously you can indeed work there, if you choose.

  70. A few tokens don't count by jeko · · Score: 1

    A couple of token managers don't count. India and China do not open their employment markets, nor any of their markets, in the manner in which they argue we should.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:A few tokens don't count by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      A couple of token managers don't count. India and China do not open their employment markets, nor any of their markets, in the manner in which they argue we should.

      Yea, that's right open them up. Droves of Americans are willing to work long hours for little pay in a factory, or drone endlessly in a call center.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  71. It must be said. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of the 'bright' immigrants who get Phds these days really are not that 'bright'. What has happened is that the Universities have become degree factories and the 'quality' once associated with a Phd has more or less vanished except for the top institutions.

    Of course, the downfall of this system is if these folks go back home and stop paying their student loans.

  72. Re:Obama Declares War on Investors, Entrepreneurs, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sir! I have a wonderful investment opportunity for you! Penis enlargement's been done to death, so's baldness cures, diet pills, laxatives, and who buys stocks anymore? Even gold's past the buy-in point! So where do you, the discerning investor, even if you've never been accused of being the sharpest knife in the drawer, put YOUR hard-earned cash? The answer, my friend is simple: TINFOIL HATS! Yes, there will never be a loss of customers from the Rush man-crush Palin a-wantin' to nail-in, Joe the Plumber ain't a Joe and ain't a plumber lovin' PATRIOTIC CONSERVATIVE AMERICANS! No conspiracy theory too wacky, unless it's from Rove, Rice, Rummy, and Darth Cheney in which case it's all good patriotifying fun, as Dear Leader would have put it! For the low price of $39.99 you can get your own TIN FOIL HABERDASHERY starter kit! Three--count-em--three FIFTEEN FOOT rolls of high-grade, high quality, SHINY brand new slightly used INDUSTRIAL GRADE TIN FOIL! That's TIN foil, not some knock-off ALUMINUM foil that's NEVER been proven to BLOCK the government's mind-control rays! But that's not all! You also get our soon-to-be BEST SELLING book: GOVERNMENT MIND CONTROL FOILED BY TIN FOIL--HATS, THAT IS! And if you ACT NOW, you'll get our FREE style guide! Yes YOU, can make fashionable BOWLERS, STETSONS, and TOP HATS made from high-quality SHINY new slightly used TIN FOIL! That's TIN foil, not ALUMINUM--don't be fooled by LOW-QUALITY IMITATIONS! But that's not all! The first 500 CALLERS will get a FREE BONUS GIFT: the LADY'S and CHILDREN'S style guide! Make VEILS and SUNHATS from HIGH-GRADE TIN FOIL for that special little lady! SHINY! Make BEANIES for the KIDS! SHINY! It's EASY with the FREE GIFT, our soon-to-be BEST SELLING STYLE GUIDE: TINFOIL HATS AND HIGH-FASHION FOR THE NEOCON IN YOU and our THREE rolls of SHINY! Industrial grade TIN FOIL! ACT NOW!

  73. House prices SHOULD be dropping. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After all, they are USED houses! Who the hell pays more for an item that is used? Only a moron.

  74. Hey! Smart people! by Eil · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get back on my lawn!

  75. Stupid visa tricks by TheSync · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My cousin from El Salvador wanted to come to the US to attend school to get an education degree. She would have been a great teacher, especially for dealing with kids who needed bilingual help. She applied to school a year after 9/11, and her student visa was delayed, delayed, delayed, so she ended up staying in El Salvador and working in HR at a recruiting firm in El Salvador.

  76. Also stopping people from entering by joe_n_bloe · · Score: 1

    True, at least our Supreme Court hasn't decided the government can randomly censor publications, the Interwebs, or even the *possession* of fairly pedestrian knowledge. (As in, having your own copy of a how-to guide for suicide.) And unlike Canada, the UK, and almost every other country, our courts don't allow "prior restraint" on publication.

    Australia was an awesome country back in the 70s, before seemingly everyone in Australia became afraid of seemingly everything.

    A friend of mine from AU found work in Canada and then a couple of years later in San Francisco, not far from where I live. But the employment climate is grimmer now.

  77. Smart Americans going home too... by californication · · Score: 2, Funny

    as they are laid off, so what's your point? I have several colleagues with a master's and years of experience getting laid off. It's not as if U.S. citizens are getting preferential treatment when it comes to who gets laid off and who doesn't. There's an oversupply of highly qualified people and less demand for these professionals. If we're losing bright people, it's because right now we don't have jobs for them.

    The fact that these highly qualified immigrants are going home is exactly why U.S. citizens SHOULD get preferential treatment when it comes to laying off or hiring people; because while an immigrant can just up and leave to their previous country, we as Americans are STUCK with this country. How many Americans have support networks outside of the U.S. that they can turn to when times get worse? It is in our best interest that this country succeed, but this country can't succeed when it invests time and money in foreign students and employees who will just up and leave when the going gets rough.

    1. Re:Smart Americans going home too... by shanen · · Score: 1

      This is a test to see whether or not you are an idiot.

      Did it occur to you that YOU could go to some other country and get a job? If you're qualified to do anything useful, that is.

      Okay, that's off on the wrong foot, but it matches the tone of your comment--at least from the perspective of someone whose grandparents were immigrants to America and who is now a long-term resident of a different country.

      How about if national tax policies be designed and structured to encourage and support those businesses that act to strengthen the nation? As it actually works now, businesses with the most money bribe the politicians to write tax policies that primarily focus on helping them make more money, often while weakening the nation.

      Exxon. Citibank. Enron.

      Want more examples?

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    2. Re:Smart Americans going home too... by californication · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, me stupid American, me can just fly over to another country and start working! No, of course I can't. Not all economies are as open as the U.S. economy is, and some countries take very protectionist stances. Just look at the "It should be a two-way street" thread above. It's very easy to qualify as a foreign guest worker in the U.S., you just need a B.A. from a U.S. University or an equivalent foreign university. The difficulty is that there are more applicants than visas actually handed out each year.

      Also, most U.S. citizens have had decades of investment in the U.S. through taxes and property owned, leaving would be much more complex and a much greater loss for a person in that situation than a non-citizen who owns no property in the U.S. and has only paid taxes for a couple of years.

      "...encourage and support those businesses that act to strengthen the nation..."

      This means nothing if U.S. citizens end up jobless because of the "global free market" attitude towards labor. I doubt any other country would be happy if Americans started coming in and competing against the locals for all their jobs.

      Last, I too am the son of an immigrant, who became a U.S. citizen. Guess what, he agrees with me that U.S. citizens should get U.S. jobs they are qualified for, before a foreign guest worker is considered. If there really are no U.S. workers available for a job, then a foreign guest worker can be considered.

    3. Re:Smart Americans going home too... by shanen · · Score: 0

      I really can't tell whether or not you're dull or whether we are mostly in agreement. You certainly don't read very carefully. For example, I am not also the son of an immigrant because my post clearly stated that I was the grandson of an immigrant to America, and less clearly that I am an emigrant from America. At least that's how I think these days and I'm not really expecting to go back.

      And yes, I did just fly over to a country with relatively closed immigration policies and highly protectionist trade policies. Those were some of the things I was especially curious about. I had to jump through various hoops, there were times I was skating on the edge, but I kept struggling, and I can say that my ultimate situation now is quite a bit better than my situation in America ever was.

      With regards to the main substance of your post, you didn't really make any strong argument about why or how American jobs should be defended. I suggested tax policies, and at this point I suggest you read that book about the flat world (Friedman?), though I mostly disagree with the author. However, he certainly addresses your perspective.

      What your posts (and many of the other posts in this discussion) mostly reminded me of was a book I read about the history of immigration in America. It was called "Immigration: Opposing Viewpoints". Historically, the most interesting aspect was how noisily each wave of immigrants argued against permitting the next wave to come in. The specific excuses were usually somewhat different each time, but the general attitude was always like yours. My particular race was regarded as racially inferior and very poorly educated.

      My take is that greed is not intrinsically bad, but selfish and mindless greed is usually harmful all around, even to the greedy bastard himself in the sufficiently long run. Just dying with the most toys is not sufficient recompense. I mostly think that America has benefited from the sustained long-term influx of ambitious people, and to a lesser degree from the influx of aggressive people. However, there is certainly such a thing as too many aggressive people in the same place.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:Smart Americans going home too... by californication · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're going to argue with me about semantics instead of the issue at hand, it is obvious you're not serious about the discussion and are only looking for a pissing contest. My point was that I am a U.S. citizen born out of an immigrant family, just like you. I may be first generation and you may be second, but the main idea is the same.

      "...I did just fly over to a country with relatively closed immigration policies..."

      So? My point is that it is much easier to enter the U.S. because of it's rather open immigration policy compared to other countries. You are simply asserting what I am saying, that in order to immigrate into another country, a U.S. citizen would have to "jump through various hoops" and "struggle" much more than foreign guest workers entering the U.S. It should be a two way street, that is if the citizens of India want the citizens of the U.S. to be more open to allowing them to work in our economy, then they need to loosen their protections on their own jobs and corporations so that it more equally matches our protections. Why should India do that? Well, why should the U.S. continue to do that? India has clearly benefited from protectionist policies during the current global crisis.

      "...each wave of immigrants argued against permitting the next wave to come in..."

      You're right, for example, the Mexican-Americans are saying to close the door on the Mexicans, as many other races and ethnicities that are naturalized are now doing. Is this wrong? It depends on the context. Right now, the U.S. unemployment rate is ballooning, and the last thing on every citizen's mind is whether someone from out of the country has a job, they are more worried that they have a job. Is there something wrong with the desire to ensure one's own survival? That's not selfish. This isn't about buying more toys, this is about being able to put food on the table, or the floor if you can't afford a table. Denying an intelligent non-citizen a job and leaving a citizen jobless are both poor choices, but we still must choose even if it is the lesser of two evils, which I believe to be giving the qualified citizen a job at the expense of the non-citizen. If the economy was booming and jobs couldn't be filled fast enough and citizens still said, "no immigrants," then that would be selfish.

      When the economy begins to grow again, and there are more jobs than local bodies to fill them, then I say start opening the door to fulfill demand, until then you are simply flooding the market with labor which will not only effect quality of life but quality of production as well. I was in support of increasing naturalization of farm workers when there was high demand for there and no Americans willing to do the job due to better opportunities, but now with the unemployment rate and reduced opportunities, some Americans may actually need those jobs, or at least what is left of them.

      It is not only the citizens who are greedy, but the non-citizens who feel entitled to the job simply because they believe themselves to be more qualified. I highly doubt many of the non-citizens who come here to work care one iota about their American neighbor. All they want is to collect a much bigger paycheck and obtain citizenship so they can continue to collect that paycheck, at which time they'll be the one's closing the door on the next wave of immigrants.

  78. Re:Let them go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kudos on the hair band reference. :)

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Indeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Germans invented everything important so who gives a shit about about indians and chinese who work their asses off to produce inferior quality products and technologies.

    Indeed, they did give the world NSDAP, concentration camps, pseudo science based racial superiority, etc. Real people of character, giving the world the likes of Josef Mengele, Heinrich Himmler, producing real quality products with forced slave labors.

  81. It matters because it distorts the market by jeko · · Score: 1

    Markets work because pressure eventually comes to bear. Wages, and therefore standards of living, rise because labor becomes scarce. For markets to be work as intended, the rules must be applied fairly. To allow India and China access to American markets, but not America to Indian and Chinese markets, distorts the outcome of the game. It not only keeps Indian workers comparatively poor, but it sucks the blood right out of the American labor market in the proverbial "race to the bottom."

    If it's sauce for the goose...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  82. Bailout = Can't Hire HB1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why they're leaving. Any company taking bailout money isn't allowed to keep their HB1 contractors. This means that they either find another job in the US, or go home. At least, this is what one of the Indians I work with told me. I work at a private company, so it doesn't affect him - but lots of his friends have the problem.

  83. Plumbing Jobs by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool, more jobs for Real Americans, like plumbing and stuff. That's like software, right? Putting stuff together and running stuff through it.

    1. Re:Plumbing Jobs by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      Except that, like with Joe the Plumber, the government will tax you and destroy your American Plumbing Dream.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    2. Re:Plumbing Jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the guy with no plumbing license and who would pay less tax under Obamas scheme? He's a good dreamer though.

  84. Probably a French Romantic Poetry degree... by jeko · · Score: 2, Funny

    On average, teenagers in America get their drivers license at sixteen. The minimum legal age to get your license in America is sixteen. Therefore, since sixteen is the average, half of them must have received their license before it was legal to do so.

    How's that Moliere paper coming?

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Probably a French Romantic Poetry degree... by whoever57 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      On average, teenagers in America get their drivers license at sixteen. The minimum legal age to get your license in America is sixteen.

      Let me suggest that you look up the meaning of "average", since you obviously don't have a grasp of this concept. Some states allow teenagers to get licenses at ages younger than 16, the minimum is lower than your claim.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  85. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, this.

    Give them back all of the management grads.

    See if we can export some of ours too.

  86. I may be a jerk but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them go.

    Seriously, the last 10 years in the industry has been hell. Lots of jobs, lots of competition, and all, but not that much innovation. How much can you refine a word processor? A glut of expertise brought in (wrongfully I believe) with H1B visas allowed companies to get sloppy and lazy.

    Maybe, if talent is scarce, companies will refocus on doing new things. When risk is the only way to make money, people will take risks.

  87. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alaren, you are absolutely correct. I'm a former academic who still has many connections and the biggest group that seems to be leaving are recently minted MBAs and B-school grads. Those are fields that just aren't doing well in an economic downturn.

    My wife of 21 years was a PhD student in Math and an immigrant from Eastern Europe when we met. Her experience opened my eyes to a population and situation that I barely knew existed. So many Americans believe that immigrants "just take a test" and they're instant citizens. Many more believe all the racial and ethnic stereotypes about intelligence and science and math skills (or lack thereof). Too many believe they take more than they give.

    I can barely imagine what it's like for a young person with talent who comes to America to try to better herself. I've walked with such a person for a couple of decades now. My grandparents were also such people, coming from war-torn (WWI) Italy to be shepherds and steelworkers and shirt-makers and railroad workers. Their sons fought in WWII. All their sons and daughters became proud and successful Americans and thanks to the Labor Unions that are now under attack from American "conservatives", became productive members of the US middle class.

    I was one of those "liberal arts students who scored higher on verbal and lower on math" that Alaren mentioned. My wife is a mathematician in a field I can hardly understand, and my daughter, now an undergrad who gets her looks from her Mom (thank god) is pretty well-rounded. She wants to be either a mathematician or a novelist. It would not suprise me if she became both.

    I get a sick feeling when I hear Americans talk down immigrants, legal and otherwise. They are as important to the formation and future of our country as the Founding Fathers.

    We have to remember, the Pilgrims (you know, the guys with the funny hats and buckled shoes from Thanksgiving) were immigrants, every one.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  88. Problem is loss of people, skills - not loss of IP by Geof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When the immigrants leave with all our IP all we are left with is paper pushers.

    The value of so-called IP is nothing beside the value of the skills, human relationships etc. for creating and developing ideas. Those who think innovation means resting on the creativity of 10, 20, life plus 70 years ago are doomed from the start. Creativity and innovation are activities, not artifacts. A focus on the frozen ideas of "IP" diverts attention from the real issues. The problem is not that the smart immigrants are taking American ideas away: it is that they are taking themselves.

  89. Aliens by garglebutt · · Score: 1

    To quote southpark goobacks: They took our jobs! http://www.southparkstudios.com/clips/104259 Ironic that people are now concerned about foreigners leaving the country.

    --
    Do anything, anywhere, anytime.
    1. Re:Aliens by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 0

      The "news" article is by " Vivek Wadhwa". Sounds like the only people who are worried are those that have a vested interest in said aliens being here.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  90. Re:Let them go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't need no instructions, to know how to ROCK!

  91. Referencing Shakespeare is obligatory, but tired by jeko · · Score: 1

    Remember, Shakespeare preceded Moliere, and no paper is complete without noting the similarities, but crediting Shakespeare with Moliere's work is a tired old trope...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  92. Re:This is bad strategy. India/GM-Canada/GM-EU by davidsyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I like to listen to The World, from BBC/NPR... In today's audio...

    http://www.theworld.org/node/24849

    "Delhi-based economic journalist Paranjoy Guha Thakurtha tells anchor Lisa Mullins why India's economy is managing some growth while many neighboring economies are slipping."

    But, what did *I* learn today? (this is from memory, and some of it my own adding...)

            India's economy is set or on track to grow some 3-5% this and next year, even though the rest of the (industrialized) world is stagnating. Why? India's economy is not nearly as integrated with the rest of the world as is the US', Japan's, Korea's, UK's, etc.

    Some 1/3 of Indians go to bed starving, but some 2/3 of "Americans" are classed as "overweight". Indian make of some 1/3 of the world's IT force, yet India's own domestic infrastructure is ~ or http://www.theworld.org/node/24850

    I learned:

    "General Motors and Chrysler produce nearly a quarter of their North American vehicles in Ontario. So they're asking Canadian taxpayers to pitch in almost a quarter of the money that the companies say they need to stay afloat. The World's Jason Margolis has more."

    So,
            Canadians produce around 25% of GM's cars, and GM wants Canadians to ante up (help out) with some 20% of the money GM needs. Including benefits, Canadian GM workers earn about $49/per hour! But, effective take-home pay is about $25/hour. Canadians, understandably, are concerned that GM or other US-carmakers will get them to sign on to a Canadian-citizen-funded auto industry bailout program, then take the money to less-expensive Asian areas, or back to the US.

    Interesting report...

    ---

    And, here:

    GM Europe 'could run out of cash'
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7922186.stm

    ----

    GM Europe 'could run out of cash'
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7879372.stm

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  93. Provide incentives, don't churn out... by weston · · Score: 1

    We (meaning America) needs to start churning out more home-grown techies.

    Not necessarily. Maybe we can just make do with nothing more than a comparative advantage is in management, insurance, banking, and finance! ;)

    Seriously, I'm not sure that the problem is that we can't produce technically proficient and brilliant folks who can advance science. The problem very well may be that as our society doesn't reward these people very well, particularly in comparison to how well it rewards lawyers, medical specialists, and MBAs. Phil Greenspun's classic Women in Science explores this (and is actually far more about the problem of rewards for a scientific career than it is specifically about gender distribution in said careers).

    I really don't hold out a lot of hope for this. Academia would be hard to change, but it's changeable, and it's probably easier to steer on a public policy level than the private sector. As for the private sector... our culture there is quite simply primed to value marketers and legal talent and management more than production workers. In fact, it's pretty much a solid tenet in the business world since the advent of industrialism that you want to make production labor as fungible as possible. We've liked to believe that creative/knowledge/information workers are immune from the reach of this, but they're not. The culture will drive management and owners to see science and engineering talent as a production resource and cost center. The other thing -- worse still -- is that it might well be true that legal, finance, and management talent can bring capital holders and business owners better returns than technical talent. At least over the last 30 years or so.

    Combine that with the fact that technical fields of study involve some hard intellectual work. And then add to that the problem that even with recent geek chic, there are still plenty of other professions with higher social status (on top of monetary rewards). I really doubt we're going to see any change in whether the US produces more science and engineering talent. Maybe the following could happen, though, in rough order from most to least likely:

    1) The economies of foreign countries become better places for their own talent to stay. They don't emigrate here, and local demand grows enough outsourcing isn't cheap either. Scientific / engineering talent becomes more expensive, and people who might have done something else decide it's worthwhile.
    2) Education, cultural, and policy changes encourage scientists and engineers to become more entrepreneurial and reap more rewards from their disciplinary sweat equity, so the potential financial rewards rise.
    3) Our downturn and narratives about our downturn become so severe towards bankers, finance folks, C-execs, and other suitlike entitites that capital holders and business are reluctant to shower them with rich financial rewards.

    We still want to encourage immigration though.

    It's true, immigration itself is a somewhat selective process, and being somewhat selective beyond that brings high-quality labor and potential social capital into the system.

    However... I don't know about the H1-B model. Seems to me it mostly allows us to place our finger on the scales of balance between talent and compensation.

  94. Not when we have an infestation of Neo-Cons by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    When you have Neo-Cons calling for expulsion of non-white immigrants from America, this is pretty much what is expected.

  95. read the summary by zome · · Score: 1

    it says most of those who're leaving have Master or PhD. Master takes 2-3 years, PhD takes 4-7 years. So those people most likely started their H1 when they are around 25-30 years old.

  96. Temporary pain for later gain? by emagery · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Granted, it hurts to lose educated people from an economy that is in desperate need of new industry (as opposed to new services and new debts) ... but ... America isn't the whole of the world, and the world as a whole has real problems. Educating these people and then dispersing them to the wind like this... it may hurt right now, but what if they take seed in places of the world in greater need of educated people... places with runaway population growth, terrible environmental records, and similarly unsustainable practices? Heck... beyond that, after a taste of democracy, who is to say all these people going back to their less tolerant homes won't also foment cultural reforms (not that our model is picture perfect right now, but...) It's a notion, anyways

  97. How the he** am I supposed to run a business... by gillbates · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I have to pay employees enough to buy a house?

    Look, I've got about 10 H1-B's working for me, and I'm saving a good half a million over hiring American workers. How am I supposed to afford a second house in the Bahamas? Honestly, you whiners are killing me here.

    And my daughter wants a Lexus when she turns 16. Hmm, I've got an open position, and I can hire an American or H1-B... Tell me, honestly, that you'd tell your daughter she'll have to drive a 2 year old Camry because Daddy hired an American!

    You people, such whiners. I tell you, these guys could teach you a lesson or two. Work less than 60 hours a week? Sure, FOR SOMEONE ELSE! Go ahead and try to leave - I can replace you in a week.

    It's sad, but some of you reading this probably don't realize its satire. Hopefully I'm not bringing up bad memories of past employers for any of you.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:How the he** am I supposed to run a business... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, you can say "hell" on Slashdot. What kind of pussy are you?

  98. More off topic: home prices. by clay_buster · · Score: 1
    Banks do renegotiate and rework. The servicers receive a fee every time they try and keep someone in the home. This can sometimes lead to situations where a person has been reworked several times when there was never any hope of them being able to make the payments. One of the problems with the existing loans is that folks signed up for step rates or teaser loans that got them into property they couldn't afford. Foreclosure is an expensive process for the banks that almost always ends up in a net loss. Up till recently, a debtor could either sell the home and get out of the loan because of the rapid appreciation or they could just hand the keys to the lender and walk away because the lender would come out close enough to whole with the paperwork savings that it was in everybody's interest. Now you have a situation where the properties are no longer worth the sizes of the mortgages which make those two processes possible.

    Foreclosures aren't the root of the falling home prices. They started falling before the lenders ramped up their processes. They are falling because they rose too quickly, because buyers were speculating and using homes as income generating devices and because people got mortgages they couldn't afford. Who thought I/O loans were a good way to get folks into homes they couldn't afford? Who thought no-paperwork loans weren't going to result in fraud?

    Banks and lenders did what they did because the market and congress beat them up if they didn't lend to everyone and if they didn't go after every possible borrower and property. Conservative outfits got hammered in the press and their stock price. Borrowers did what they did because they thought housing was the path to wealth and not just a place to live. Lending guidelines that were in place 20 years ago will come back again because they existed for a reason. All the "new ways of looking at money" crap was greed at all levels.

    1. Re:More off topic: home prices. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      And to kick us when we are down. It looks like the 'help' coming from the government will only effect the people who did the wrong thing, (took mortgages that they never could afford, used homes as income generating devices). The people who took a mortgage they could afford (and got a lot less house cause of the high prices a few years ago) are really getting screwed. They will not qualify for a mortgage restructure. They might if they can prove the mortgage is over 37% (got to recheck it was 31% then it moved up in another article. I have seen one say 45%) of their annual income.

      This is totally wrong in my mind. The government is helping people who made bad decisions. The people who didn't buy out of their price range, only have one place and they are living in it. Get no help. Even though they are paying down a mortgage that is higher then what they can sell the place for.

  99. 400K McMansion FTW by digitaltraveller · · Score: 1

    Even if H-1B workers are good for the U.S., which is debatable, it doesn't matter in the long run, because American companies will continue to offshore work because of the cost of living in the U.S.

    In the country I live in (Australia) I own a 4bedroom house in an inner-city suburb. (That's considered desirable here.) The house is worth a shade under 2M and it's nothing special. That's pretty typical for your average professional here.

    I run a small sw company that is developing software for android. Labor costs in Australia are very expensive. It's tough to find good engineers for less than 100K/yr. The best graduates usually want to work for the big blue chip companies. Despite the alleged global economic downturn, unemployment here is still very low.

    I would love to move to the U.S. and take advantage of the insanely cheap housing and labor costs. However the process looks hard, scary and filled with uncertainty. I would be required to retain ownership of my Australian house as proof that I plan on coming back. There is no guarantee I could stay there if I went, though I could renew my visa indefinitely.

    I bet there are thousands of small business people like myself worldwide. Given the chance these people would move to the U.S. and open small-medium sized businesses that would provide a ton of jobs. But it's just too risky for many of us at the moment.

    Canada is similar and I could move there tomorrow but let's face it, it's just too damn cold. I have one of the most beautiful beaches in the world about 30 minute drive from my door now. If I moved to the U.S. it would be to the South West.

    It's a bit of a shame. I would love to buy a house in the U.S. real estate market right now.

    1. Re:400K McMansion FTW by Darby · · Score: 1

      In the country I live in (Australia) I own a 4bedroom house in an inner-city suburb.

      What does that even mean?
      The inner city is just what it says, the inner part of the city.
      A suburb is by definition *outside* of the city.

      So do you live in the city, or do you live in a suburb?

  100. Brains leave to go home by cttnpckn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Last week I worked for a company that has their roots here. Now the whole company is moving to India (back to where the owners are from). They have laid off all the American workers and are taking the indian workers home with them. They say that they aren't selling enough of their product here and they can sell their product in those countries back home. So, here we are: where we cannot afford to buy the products that the Indians can afford. The emerging markets are growing and our markets are not. The problem here isn't that we are loosing brain power. The problem here is that we are loosing our whole market. Of course in 10 years this might settle itself out somewhat but what will be left? Lots less than if we had controlled the money system in the first place. The problem is that corporations want something for nothing and then we are all left with lots less. The problem was that the derivative market was printing so much money no government could hope to keep up. Ultimately we rise and fall together (owners and workers), (foreign and american) and we really can't pretend that any other system will work. We have to control thieves, double check the integrity of the products that are sold. We have to keep a careful eye on how those products are produced so we don't kill our planet trying to sustain this crazy consumption lifestyle that we have created. There is no easy answer here.

    1. Re:Brains leave to go home by californication · · Score: 1

      Did any of the American workers get job offers if they were willing to relocate?

    2. Re:Brains leave to go home by cttnpckn · · Score: 1

      NO! But the ones from india were.

  101. Re:There's plenty of room - WTF!? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Do you live in a cave? The real US unemployment rate is probably as high as it's been since the great depression. You can't read the headlines without coming across news of another huge layoff.

    There absolutely is not plenty of room.

  102. Canada wants all of them! by origamy · · Score: 1

    Canada started a policy to fast-track Immigration (not Visa) processing for H1B holders - http://www.immigration.ca/permres-pnp-h1b.asp or http://www.canadavisa.com/strategic-recruitment-stream-h1b-visa.html

    I guess the US loss is Canada's gain!

  103. OK, now I'm feeling guilty by jeko · · Score: 1

    OK, now I feel bad for you. Look, you're confusing the concepts of mean and range.

    Consider the set {10,10,10,10,10,10,10}

    The mean (average) is 10. That doesn't mean half the set members are less than ten. It simply means that the range (largest member minus smallest member) is small, or in this case zero.

    Here's a great middle school tutorial on mean, median, mode and range: http://www.purplemath.com/modules/meanmode.htm

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:OK, now I'm feeling guilty by whoever57 · · Score: 1, Troll

      There is no point continuing the discussion with you since you are clearly clue-resistant. Let me just point out a couple of things before I go: 1. You have not refuted my other correction about "dual intent". 2. A set where all the members are identical is interesting but unrepresentative of either the ages of people who get H1-B visas or teenagers getting licenses. Apparently in your world, the range of ages at which people get H1-B visas is zero -- in other words, everyone gets their visa at the same age. There are many people who get H1-B visas who are several years or decades out of college. Apparently, these people don't exist in your fantasy world. In a normal distribution, there are population members above the average and population members below the average, in roughly equal numbers. According to you, since the average number of years out of college at which people get H1-B visas is zero, there should be a population of H1-B visa holders who got their visa at something less than their degree age. Now do you see the problem?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:OK, now I'm feeling guilty by whoever57 · · Score: 1, Troll

      One more thing -- by "average" you may be thinking of "mode" -- ie. the value that occurs most often. That definition does not imply a significant number of H1-Bs without college degrees, but I don't believe that the mode of ages at which people get H1-b visas is college graduation age.

      If mode is what you meant by average, then I challenge you to find some documentation to support it. Otherwise STFU.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:OK, now I'm feeling guilty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider the set {10,10,10,10,10,10,10}

      The mean (average) is 10. That doesn't mean half the set members are less than ten.

      True, but if one of the numbers is greater than 10 then at least one of the others must be less than 10 to keep the average unchanged.

      Or, translating the analogy to the problem at hand: If there is just one H-1B visa holder who started years after graduating from college (say, after getting a PhD), then there must be at least one other who started before graduating from college to keep the "average age at which H1-Bs (sic) come to this country" at "fresh out of college".

      And in fact most of them have grad degrees anyway, so the average is much higher.

    4. Re:OK, now I'm feeling guilty by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 1

      I am enjoying your posts. How is it that someone can have such an incredible ego, and post with such arrogance, but at the same time not even understand how averages work? While you post away, acting all confident, the rest of /. is laughing at you.

  104. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  105. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by BitterOak · · Score: 1

    Predictably, physics and engineering students scored high on math and lower on verbal; liberal arts students scored higher on verbal and lower on math. Management students tended to score lower than almost everyone on both sections (with education students averaging lowest of all, though there may be some interesting "continuing education" reasons for this).

    And where's the part where you show that GRE scores correlate with contribution to society and the economy later in life?

    --
    If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
  106. Re: I have no idea how Ireland feels about ... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    ... immigrants from the US...

    Probably doesn't matter but I'd guess they wouldn't be all that excited about a bunch of Americans coming into their country. Just saw an article about how the rest of the world outside of the US was fairing during the current economic downturn. The Irish economy is in the dumper nowadays. Heck, even having relatives over in Ireland (which I do) may not be enough to let you stay there for an extended time and take a job. Other than the scenery there's not as much going for it as there was a few years ago.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  107. man, where to start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have all the fatcat globalist buzzwords, but total epic fail on the details in reality.

    Right off the bat, the US is at a critical tipping point for such things as just plain water availability. It's in the headlines, read up on it, we CAN'T support very many more people just from that single reason. We can barely maintain what we have now is huge areas of the nation. And don't negate the seriousness of this either or think it isn't a factor.

    Next, in a fast shrinking economy, dumping more labor into the pool further exacerbates the jobs-available situation, it doesn't create more jobs by having more people looking for jobs, and startups are by the zillions and are almost all failing, because of point one, a fast declining labor market that is also reeling from being too much in debt.

    Another facet is we have no affordable housing, especially at entry level, even with price drops, housing is becoming more and more untenable in the ownership arena. We have gone from 10 year mortgages to now 30 year mortgages and even interest only mortgages, ie, a fancy way to say a renter forever but delude yourself you are even going to be an "owner". The places with affordable housing have no jobs, places with still decent jobs still have extraordinarily skewed housing prices. And all other costs of living keep going up, food prices for example from commodities skimmers and parasites are a big one there as well.

    Pensions and retirements are now *completely fucking hosed* for millions of people after they believed your globalist lies. You have tens of millions of boomers who are NOT going to retire and make way with giving up the jobs, they won't be able to now, they will stay in the workforce if possible, and many of the "greatest generation" are now so broke from your butt buddies with their wall street ripoffs they are being forced back into looking for work. Yep, 70-80 year old folks. Just for that you globalist assholes should be ashamed of yourselves, you freaking scum.

    As to protectionism, way back when we had a true smaller constitutional government and government was funded mostly from sane import and export tariffs, we built the largest and most fantastic industrial base and ag base ever seen on the planet. Once we stopped that, and let those thieves at the Fed and the other bankers and wall street traitors run the economy, it all went to shit. FAILURE to protect the indigenous middle class and purposefully leading them on to "invest" in your casino stock lies and fiat credit based liars currencies is exactly what caused the first great depression, and now they did it fucking again, the great huge ripoff version two plus they want to be PIAD via more tax payer debt as a REWARD for their fraudulent policies.

    How you dare to support that insanity and keep calling it a good thing is something I will never understand.

    And our labor isn't expensive, it was just about perfect for a robust middle class until around 25 years ago when this huge ripoff got in high gear. It was fine before the greed merchants decided to go whole hog and destroy it all for SHORT TERM GAINS. Our FATCAT SALARIES at the top are the only "too expensive" labor we have, along with a government make work busy work create a million new regulations a year jobs program that is 5 or 10 times bigger than it needs to be. THAT is what is way too expensive and we have way too many "financial professionals" who as middleman skimmers do nothing but shove electrons around and game the system. They don't produce a thing, just skim the cream constantly. They don't offshore or import replacements for THEMSELVES, some replacements who will work for pennies on their golden parachute dollar.

    This is what would work, a return to what we had pre-creation of the huge fraud called the federal reserve and allowing the casino shillers on wall street to set policy by being appointed to positions in government:

    We need FAIR trade

    1. Re:man, where to start by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right off the bat, the US is at a critical tipping point for such things as just plain water availability. It's in the headlines, read up on it, we CAN'T support very many more people just from that single reason. We can barely maintain what we have now is huge areas of the nation. And don't negate the seriousness of this either or think it isn't a factor.

      This can be addressed by changing how we use water, how we approach development, etc. This is not a problem without solutions (pardon the pun) -- restrict development in water-limited areas. Reduce water consumption (I did mention reducing standard of living, and egregious consumption is part of that -- I also mentioned the unsustainable natural resource use, which water is part of).

      Next, in a fast shrinking economy, dumping more labor into the pool further exacerbates the jobs-available situation, it doesn't create more jobs by having more people looking for jobs, and startups are by the zillions and are almost all failing, because of point one, a fast declining labor market that is also reeling from being too much in debt.

      The economy needs to be retooled. Increasing the labor pool also increases demand for consumer goods -- and reduced wages will enable us to competitively manufacture consumer goods (especially as fuel and energy costs continue to rise globally).

      Another facet is we have no affordable housing, especially at entry level, even with price drops, housing is becoming more and more untenable in the ownership arena. We have gone from 10 year mortgages to now 30 year mortgages and even interest only mortgages, ie, a fancy way to say a renter forever but delude yourself you are even going to be an "owner". The places with affordable housing have no jobs, places with still decent jobs still have extraordinarily skewed housing prices. And all other costs of living keep going up, food prices for example from commodities skimmers and parasites are a big one there as well.

      The affordable housing issue will sort itself out, if we have the contraction that is needed. It'll be painful... but note that the intense inflationary period we'll be going through in the next decade will wipe out a lot of the housing pain. We need to pay the piper.

      As to protectionism, way back when we had a true smaller constitutional government and government was funded mostly from sane import and export tariffs, we built the largest and most fantastic industrial base and ag base ever seen on the planet. Once we stopped that, and let those thieves at the Fed and the other bankers and wall street traitors run the economy, it all went to shit. FAILURE to protect the indigenous middle class and purposefully leading them on to "invest" in your casino stock lies and fiat credit based liars currencies is exactly what caused the first great depression, and now they did it fucking again, the great huge ripoff version two plus they want to be PIAD via more tax payer debt as a REWARD for their fraudulent policies.

      Ah, here is where your true nature shines through. Let me give you hint -- first, the global economy is very different than it was in the 1800s. Just advances in transportation have changed the very nature of how economies work. Never mind the fact that the economy went to shit plenty of times before the institution of the Fed, of income tax, etc -- the Fed was created BECAUSE the economy went to shit so often.

      And our labor isn't expensive, it was just about perfect for a robust middle class until around 25 years ago when this huge ripoff got in high gear. It was fine before the greed merchants decided to go whole hog and destroy it all for SHORT TERM GAINS. Our FATCAT SALARIES at the top are the only "too expensive" labor we have, along with a government make work busy work create a million new regulations a year jobs program that is 5 or 10 times bigger than

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  108. Not enough by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The temporary H1-B visa was supposed to be good for seven years. The average age at which H1-Bs come to this country is fresh out of college, so 22-23 years old plus seven years is about thirty.

    Though many science PhD programs take around 7 years. Which means you finish your degree and then your H1-B is expired; at which point you have to go back to your "home" country, even though you just spent 7 years working in the US. I know PhD students from eastern European countries who are expected (by the US State Dept) to return to their 2nd-world countries for two years after graduation before they can come back to the US to further their careers in this country.

    So if we are discussing the brain drain and immigration, we should really reconsider the way our immigration system works.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Not enough by base3 · · Score: 1

      Full-time students are not here on H1-B visas.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  109. communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the one thing no one even wants to mention is the fact than 80% of all immigrated people, still fail at basic communication skills.
    that comes from differences in culture, daily life.
    some people do leave not because they hate the place they're in, but because they cannot communicate effectivly in the environment.

  110. But that's the point... by BlueCoder · · Score: 2, Informative

    You sound like some company taking advantage of H1B visa applicants. The whole theory of H1B is that they do go back home.

    The goal is to raise the quality of life for the world. To create jobs and worldwide economic success. Our chief export should be success.

    Just watch ten or twenty years from now when the tech companies using H1B applicants and the ones shipping jobs offshore find out that they created their own competition. Competition that is very hungry and aggressive. Competition that will one day be hiring the top 10% of American talent. Not because it's cheap but because of greater demand of genuine skills and talent.

    1. Re:But that's the point... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The whole theory of H1B is that they do go back home.

      No, it's not.

  111. Want American STEM students? Provide jobs for them by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    >>It is also important to note that for many colleges and universities, foreign nationals make up a large portion of the student body

    It doesn't have to be that way. Americans would be glad to study STEM, if Americans felt there would be career opportunities when they graduated.

    But, with the hyper-aggressive offshoring, and replacing Americans with guest workers, Americans are wisely avoiding STEM.

  112. It is a shame... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just great about the US though.

    We can't seem to keep the LEGAL immigrants we want...the educated ones, that followed the laws, and contribute to the system. Instead, we are stuck with the ILLEGAL ones, that...well......generally are the opposite of the aforementioned legal ones.

    *sigh*

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:It is a shame... by tsm_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, treat them both the same way and see how far it gets you.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    2. Re:It is a shame... by ag0ny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It probably has something to do with the fact that after 9/11 the USA has become increasingly police state-like.

      Before 9/11 happened I was looking forward to go back to the US and see NYC (I liked Massachusetts). Then the planes hit and the towers fell, and after the initial scare passed your country went irrationally paranoid about security.

      I decided not to set foot on the US again until your government came back to its senses. You know, I don't like to be treated as a criminal by default when visiting a foreign country. I assume this is part of the reason why those people are leaving.

      It seems that now things might start to change (hopefully for good).

    3. Re:It is a shame... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's why I moved back to Canada and decided not to work in the U.S. again, even though I have had a number of calls and offers to come back in the short time I have been away (even in this recession). It leaves me feeling a bit down since I really liked living there in Saint Louis; the first city I have really been home sick over. It drove me crazy that it was such a pain in the ass to get a green card even though I spent all told 7 years there on work visas. I kept my nose clean, at worst I got two parking tickets which I paid, and contributed time and money to a local non profit group that tries to take care of various issues the old blues musicians in town run into (the one's who are poor because of the way they were ripped off on royalties by the same recording companies trying to sue single mothers). Meanwhile I keep hearing how congress wants to grant immunity and green cards to all those who have been living there for more than a couple of years illegally.

      Another thing, many Americans don't realize that working on many/most of the various work visas means you have a month to back up and get out of America if your job ends, something that does kind of wear on you after a while... especially in a slowing economy. That is, knowing you might have to not only look for new work if your job ends, but also new work in a different country while still being away (not as easy as if you are there), and finding a new home in a different country and all the moving issues around that. I left the middle of last year from the U.S. (I quit, I didn't get laid off) because of all of those kinds of issues.

      "Give us your poor, your tired, your huddled masses longing to be free..." maybe that is more true than I thought. If I am not poor or longing to be free, if I don't need welfare or government assistance, maybe that's the reason it is so hard to get a green card if you are a computer professional. I should have applied for welfare. Ha! That's it! If I ever do go back to work in the U.S. I'll swim across the border... that way I might have a better chance of getting a green card. When the economy goes south, you want to keep the good minds since they are the ones most likely to help you get it back on the road. The reverse brain drain is a case of the U.S. having its cake and finding out what it's like to want to eat it too.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:It is a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember what is written on the Liberty statue?
      "Give me your tired, your poor,
      Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
      The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
      Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
      I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

      Bright, educated, law abiding etc. should move along. I, for example, being a Russian citizen, could be a naturalized US citizen in few months and zero dollars if I were a Jew or a follower of one of few obscure cults no matter what my education and income were. Being a mere MS with 10 years of professional experience and an atheist at that, earning a decent 6 figure salary I am not an immigration material. Not quite poor neither well tired. Still I am a lot luckier than an Indian or Chinese in the same situation - I don't have to wait till the Priority Date on my Green Card application becomes current (current PDs now are Feb 04 for India and Feb 05 for China), in fact I might have been approved for GC any day in the past 3 years! It costs few grand a year to renew all the papers I need (EAD, AP, H1 too) but my employer pays. It takes a long time to verify that I am not going to move into social housing, I guess. We already have Obama's relatives straining public welfare system so much that even slightest mistake is not allowed.

      Yet I am still going to get GC and then citizenship (unless I am sent back packing, of course) because I did not come to this country for the money. Americans commenting on slashdot and other places don't realize how lucky they are living in the US.

    5. Re:It is a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that now things might start to change (hopefully for good).

      Nope. The people who voted for Dubya are still there.

    6. Re:It is a shame... by master_p · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. The reasons are purely economical. There are more jobs in their home countries than in the US.

    7. Re:It is a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed,

      do a lot of traveling myself. have not seen a more irritating place than the borders in the USA. it as if you're guilty until proven innocent... and don't let me speak about the powertripping security personnel...

    8. Re:It is a shame... by cstec · · Score: 1

      Remember what is written on the Liberty statue?

      Yeah, sorry about that, we haven't gotten around to updating it with the new plaque yet

      Through me you pass into the city of woe:
      Through me you pass into eternal pain:
      Through me among the people lost for aye.

      Justice the founder of my fabric mov'd:
      To rear me was the task of power divine,
      Supremest wisdom, and primeval love.

      Before me things create were none, save things
      Eternal, and eternal I endure.
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.

    9. Re:It is a shame... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It seems that now things might start to change (hopefully for good)."

      From what we've seen so far...I wouldn't hold my breath.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:It is a shame... by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      We can't seem to keep the LEGAL immigrants we want...the educated ones, that followed the laws, and contribute to the system. Instead, we are stuck with the ILLEGAL ones, that...well......generally are the opposite of the aforementioned legal ones.

      USA, a country of immigrants... not anymore.

    11. Re:It is a shame... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Paradox of the middle. This is still a great country -- to many. If you are trying to survive in the Democratic Republic of the Congo you'd love to have the opportunity to come here.

      I'm not impressed with these guys returning now. I was trying to talk my wife into emigrating back in '03-'04 when our ages were more likely to let us squeak through for citizenship in Canada. It was clear to any thinking person that the country would be in a shambles in a few years. But no. So, lucky us. Front seats at the end times.
         

    12. Re:It is a shame... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Oh I know how lucky I am. I'm just worried that I'm watching the greatness of America being flushed down the toilet - that the great America I grew up in will be a hell-hole for my children to grow up in. :-/

    13. Re:It is a shame... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does Massachusetts have to do with NYC?

    14. Re:It is a shame... by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are not kidding there.

      Yesterday I went to the USA Consulate to get a tourist visa for my daughter. She is going to Disney World in June.

      Anyway, I was stuck inside an open area, with the temperature almost at 100 degrees, for 2 hours. Without a place to sit. Yes, there were some wooden benches, but way too many people. Some of the other applicants were there for 4+ hours. All the visa officers were behind bullet proof glasses, and talked to us using something that passes for a mic/speaker. And when, because of that, I could not understand what the visa officer was saying, I've got insulted by him.

      I mean, c'mon. I was there to give the USA money (tourism is still one of the best sources of income for a country, last I checked). And I've got stuck on an open warehouse-like area, got treated like I was trying to visit someone at the jail, got insulted and, to add insult to injury, had to pay to have the passport mailed back to me by our local equivalent of FEDEX, at DOUBLE the normal rate for that service.

      Interesting enough, the local people that works at the consulate (ie: non-visa officers) were all very nice and helpful. However, the USA citizen working there were treating me like crap. But my 13yo daughter wants to visit Disney World. I know I, for one, will take my vacations somewhere else.

      --
      morcego
    15. Re:It is a shame... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      Not all illegal ones are stupid/uneducated. I applied for a job in the US many years ago. The interview was for developing UI systems to custom hardware (pretty cool stuff) during the interview it became quite evident that while they were willing to give me a job they weren't going to do the Visa system. Instead the interviewer kept talking about Mexico and what areas I should visit and what streets/areas will allow me to jump the fence as it were.

      I didn't take the job (for obvious reasons) but I suspect they were not the only company doing it back then.

    16. Re:It is a shame... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      You should take your daughter to Tokyo Disneyland or Paris Disneyland, anyway. They're both much nicer.

    17. Re:It is a shame... by Mex · · Score: 1

      I don't want to get into an immigration debate but aren't the illegal immigrants you don't want doing the jobs americans don't want to do? Otherwise they wouldn't find any jobs out there, and they'd come back.

    18. Re:It is a shame... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I don't want to get into an immigration debate but aren't the illegal immigrants you don't want doing the jobs americans don't want to do? Otherwise they wouldn't find any jobs out there, and they'd come back."

      That's always been a fallacy....they are just undercutting what US citizens need for pay for those jobs...they've killed the house construction industry. Well, at least before the economy tanked.

      With the economy the way it is....I'm guessing more and more US citizens are gonna be scrounging for just about any job they can get....which may start to push the illegals out....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:It is a shame... by Physician · · Score: 1

      No, Mex. They're doing the jobs Americans don't want to do for the pay they receive. Increase the salary enough and Americans will do any job under the sun.

      --
      Does God treat us as servants or friends? Check my homepage.
  113. Re:Let them go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, you can have those guys working in engineering, physics or biotech fields in US - preferably as citizens - or you can have them working on thermonuclear warheads, delivery systems, and biological weapons in China or Russia. Your pick.

    I'll go with whichever one kills more fucking Americans.

  114. NYT: India's protectionism is a great success by walterbyrd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda funny, I think. We are so constantly lectured that the US should not have any "protectionist" policies against India, because protectionism never works.

    March 1, 2009

    India Maintains Sense of Optimism and Growth

    India's trillion-dollar economy remains a relative bright spot, some say, in part because the country's bureaucracy and its protectionist polices have kept it insulated from the fallout of the global downturn.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/business/worldbusiness/02rupee.html?_r=1&ref=world

     

    1. Re:NYT: India's protectionism is a great success by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But yet, that's just a facade to hide the fact that India has these gigantic problems:

      Overpopulation--India has 1.1 billion people, just too much for a country of that size.

      Disparity between rich and poor--there are gigantic slums in almost every major city in India, where people live in extreme squalor and the potential for a huge number of deaths from disease is very real.

      Pollution--because of all this high-density human activity, pollution in various forms is still a very serious problem.

      Cultural strife--because of the gigantic number of cultures on the Indian subcontinent, cultural strife is a very serious problem. (We forget only Pakistan and Indonesia have more Muslims than India, despite the 80% Hindu majority.)

      India will have to come to grips with all four of these problems if they are to be a major partner with the rest of the world.

  115. How Many Go Home Anyway? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Those stats are meaningless without a baseline comparison to how many foreigners used to come here to get educated, work and save some money, build a resume, then go to another country where their money and resume is worth even more in buying power than here.

    This research looks like just another fake study designed to convince Congress and Americans to keep replacing American workers with foreigners who are subsidized to compete with Americans by living abroad at least part of the time where things are cheaper. They don't care about the worse labor conditions there because they don't work there (they work here), and they don't care about the environment because they haven't grown up expecting better.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  116. Highly qualified US IT workers can not find jobs by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Why is everybody is such a wad about Indian temp workers? What about all the US workers who can find jobs because the market is so glutted? Doesn't the US have a right, and a responsibility, to take of it's own interests first?

    Please take a quick look at this, if you don't believe me:

    http://techtoil.org/wiki/doku.php?id=articles:news_and_commentary

  117. No problems with H1B VISA workers by magamiako1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The US could compete if the cost of getting an education here was much cheaper. The problem is--it isn't.

    I have no problems with the foreign workers themselves. They, like us, are trying to make a good living. And they do a good job at that.

    But they have a much lower cost of education. Doing a quick google search brings up the following URL on the education cost in India.

    http://prayatna.typepad.com/education/2005/07/what_does_a_uni.html

    While the above cost may be amazingly expensive in India, you could quickly pay all of that cost back by scoring a job in the United States. The average cost of a similar education in the US is sometimes as much as 10 times that, even higher if you attend a private university.

    It's not that American workers are underskilled or underqualified, it's that the cost of entry into the same field of work is significantly higher than these foreign workers. The cost of something like a PhD is even much higher than a simple bachelor's degree.

    And people wonder why you can't find "quality American workers".

    1. Re:No problems with H1B VISA workers by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia we have a scheme where the government loans most of the costs of tertiary education, with interest set to equal inflation only. The tax office automatically deducts payments when a certain income threshold is reached (around $40k), and you can voluntarily repay more at any time and receive a 10% discount. Effectively, anyone rich or poor can attend university and will not be burdened by the debt until they have adequate employment. It's a great system and I'm surprised that more countries don't do the same.

    2. Re:No problems with H1B VISA workers by ca111a · · Score: 1

      1. Live in the US, have kids.
      2. Send them to school in India.
      3. Find them jobs here in the US after they graduate. They don't need visa since they were born here.
      4. ...
      5. Profit!

      The "..." is the absence of a humongous amount of debt which has special rules applied and cannot even be erased by bankruptcy. Now back to the point of: How to get here if you were born overseas...

  118. There you go by fudoniten · · Score: 1
    I've got to say it:

    There you go, you've got your damn jobs back!

    (In reference to the prevalent attitude that companies ought not to hire 'foreign labour', they should only hire Americans. Well, ha!)

  119. Don't let the door hit you in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are proportionate ratios of retards in India and China as in the US. They just have a bigger pool. When I miss the condescending Indian attitude, all I need to do is call Dell to get that warm fuzzy feeling right back. Peace out.

  120. H-1B program is hurting US STEM education by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been teaching IT courses for the past 13 years. The drop-off in enrollments, beginning in 2001, has been remarkable.

    Talking one-on-one with students, I have found that the prospect of losing a job -- or of not being able to get one in the first place -- because of competition from lower-paid employees both here and abroad is causing students to switch careers away from IT. And who could blame them? Working hard to earn a degree only to have the job market flooded by lower-paid employees is discouraging.

    This indirect effect of hiring H-1B employees is one that doesn't get much discussion. Maybe it is time that it did, because we are losing the ability to compete technically with European and Asian countries.

    Danny Clarke
    Instructor, math and computer science
    Truckee Meadows Community College
    Reno, Nev.

    http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=334764

  121. India needs to build their own economy by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    India has four times the population of the USA. It only stands to reason that the US can not provide jobs for the Indians who want to work here. In fact, the US can not even provide jobs for US citizens.

    The US tech industry was in much better shape before all the offshoring and guest workers. Enough is enough.

  122. The real plight of immigrants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm an Indian student at one of the top most universities. I'm pursuing my Masters. I have a few things to say about this situation especially about the fees that are imposed on non-Americans. We pay 3 times and more as our american counter parts ( and mind you the conversion rate from USD to INR is 1USD = ~50INR ). We take up part time jobs to take care of our living expenses and we still manage to be on top. I heard America was all about equality and such **** but its just a lip service to the world now. Companies have refused several of my brilliant peers just because they were on an F1 visa. Shocking? I thought companies weren't supposed to discriminate amongst people applying for internships or even full time positions as long as we have *work authorization*. Every single person I met at my university told me that America was all about treating people equally and yet every single company I have dealt with have blatantly made me feel discriminated simply because I dont have *permanent work authorization* in the country. Whats the point of having an F1 visa if companies are simply going to *discriminate* against us? ( Despite their stupid form which says we're an equal opportunity employer. What does equal opportunity mean?! ) As for our American counter parts, there are about 5 Americans in a class of about 80, they're really nice people, warm, helpful. They're not lazy and some of them work much harder than us. As the report pointed out very correctly, that Americans have become a bunch of paper pushers and the government needs to stimulate more American children towards Math and Science. Last but not least, the H1B visa program has put immigrant workers at such a BIG disadvantage that if the employer fires us we have no choice but to pick up our belongings and get the hell out of the country. What the hell do we pay the social security tax for then? I fully understand that the program was supposed to fill the need for skilled laborers in short supply but frankly an H1B worker has lesser rights than a child laborer working in an obscure factory in Calcutta. Dont forget that most people here in the US have immigrants as their ancestors. America was built on an immigrant population damn it! Why do people keep forgetting that?!

  123. US tech was stronger before the flood of h1bs by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US tech industry was built, and grew explosively, before the flood of h1bs. Now we are supposed to believe that only Indians are capable of understanding technology.

    Is there any real evidence to prove that h1bs have been all that helpful to US technology? When did msft start all hiring so many h1bs? Right after XP and before Vista wasn't it? Banks have been hiring tons of h1bs, and they are all just doing great aren't they?

    There are plenty of highly qualified US tech workers, many of whom are unemployed, why is so critical to keep flooding the market with h1bs?

    1. Re:US tech was stronger before the flood of h1bs by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is there any real evidence to prove that h1bs have been all that helpful to US technology? When did msft start all hiring so many h1bs? Right after XP and before Vista wasn't it? Banks have been hiring tons of h1bs, and they are all just doing great aren't they?

      Rose-colored glasses, you must have. Remember that XP was a buggy steaming pile of dung when it was released, too.

      As for banks, that has nothing to do with engineers or coders, that has to do with top-level decisions and deregulation.

      Keep in mind that Citibank's core software was developed in India long before any of this shit hit the fan.

      Correlation !- causation, and it's either ignorant or disingenuous of you to link either MS's crapware or ting fiasco with H1B employees.

      There are plenty of highly qualified US tech workers, many of whom are unemployed, why is so critical to keep flooding the market with h1bs?

      Please read any number of the posts above that explain why increasing the labor supply is important to maintaing the US economy in the long run.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:US tech was stronger before the flood of h1bs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to this downturn, my orders at McD's are now done correctly. However at one of my favorite restaurants, my chicken tikka masala lately has really been quite pitiful.

  124. Nail on the head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work with a high percentage of Indians, I'd say 90% of them have masters degrees or better. They are in NO WAY better or more intelligent than the American workers with bachelors degrees, in most cases they are far worse. Those that are better get good deals, those that are worse scrap but are very happy to be here, most or all wish they could easily get citizenship. Personally, I'd take a local American worker with a bachelors over an immigrant any day of the week, and that's NOT just for protectionism but for value, loyalty, integrity and communication.

    (Highly Educated) != (valuable || intelligent).

    Not necessarily at least.

    1. Re:Nail on the head... by anand78 · · Score: 1

      RTFA, that's precisely what's happening.

  125. Instead of offshoring the jobs, offshore people by voss · · Score: 1

    If the cost of living is so much lower in india, why not make a deal to let americans work for American companies in india, alongside the indians.

    Let the indians do the tier 1 stuff, and let the americans do tier 2 and 3, get a lot lower wages than in the US but live a lot better(maid, child care, gardener, hot indian girlfriend), im betting for 15k a year in india you could live pretty well.

    1. Re:Instead of offshoring the jobs, offshore people by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

      voss:

      Even if the countries allowed American workers to do something like that, it would be nearly impossible for us to do it financially.

      Unlike them, where the cost of debts is a smaller portion of their paycheck (due to exchange rate), the reverse is true for American workers.

      So you end up going to school here, go $40,000 into debt on student loans. Then move to India and that becomes a significant portion (if not moreso) of your paycheck.

    2. Re:Instead of offshoring the jobs, offshore people by californication · · Score: 1

      So it seems the answer is for Americans to start sending their children to universities in other countries? If the quality of the education is roughly the same, I don't see a problem with this, as long as they can retain their citizenship and return to the U.S. and get a decent job. We buy cheap material goods from other countries, maybe we should be buying more important stuff like a cheaper education?

  126. Brain drain because we educate the worlds elite ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't get it. If we are driving out top notch students that are returning to their country of origin in record numbers after we educate them...anyway... aren't our resources being wasted on them ? Maybe we should spend on Americans, that might not have tested so high, but perfectly capable of contributing to the country: both intellectually and economically ? Educated Americans that would stay in America.

  127. Re:Let them go by mooreti1 · · Score: 1

    God, tell me you aren't our hope for "more" or we, as a nation and a society, are going to be sooo screwed. Besides, most of our young, bright minds are too damn busy becoming lawyers to go through the rigors of education to become scientists and engineers. Well, lawyers and reality-TV stars.

    --
    Oh, for the days when sig's didn't have to be cute...hey, wait a sec.
  128. Think Smaller Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some small states in the US provide free or nearly free higher education only to watch them leave for other states. No jobs and no reason to stay when there is greener pasture elsewhere.

  129. Re:Let them go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen a lot of the immigrants we've gotten... and I'd rather they were making crappy stuff in China and Russia ;).

    It seems like for every reasonably good immigrant there are 8 other lazy and incompetent ones.

  130. Re:Let them go by relguj9 · · Score: 1

    Of course this is all anecdotal, but in my experience the majority of the educated immigrants are here for the education and job opportunities, not to stay here permanently.

    My experience has mirrored this. If they want to stay they will find a way, and I for one welcome them openly. As a result, it's generally more intelligent for a business to hire someone local who they know it'll be easier to keep and who'll generally be happier working there.

  131. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Labor unions are under attack because they've gone from organizations that were concerned about worker health and safety to parasites that exist only to suck as many concessions for the industries they deal with. So, not only are the companies hobbled with an over priced work force, they are crippled to how flexible they can be with respect to adopting new technology or simple things as job duties. You have to look no further than the UAW and its contracts with the US auto makers. To their credit, GM and Ford do operate some efficient world class factories. The problem is that NONE of them are in North America because of the UAW. On top of it all, they take dues that are meant for collective benefits for the workers and use that to support political parties that the workers may or may not support.

    I have relatives that are or were UAW auto workers and it is unbelievable how slack their jobs are or what nonsense the hard core slackers can get away with.

  132. "desirable" ? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    Way to editorialize. I for one, am happy to see fewer certification-hoarding, Samir Not-gonna-work-heres in the industry.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  133. Re:Let them go by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    It seems like for every reasonably good immigrant there are 8 other lazy and incompetent ones.

    And for every reasonably good american there are at least 8 other lazy and incompetent ones.

  134. What a PUTZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have OBVIOUSLY never been out of America or EU. China and India really are lacking on a LOT of things. These ppl are heading back because it is getting hard to find jobs here (plenty of ppl with similar degrees and work hard), so lower costs of living elsewhere. The hard thing is that recession is JUST starting to hit China and India. Both have their money fixed against US dollar and as such have been siphoning jobs and then turning around and counting on exports to AMerica. Only we are not buying. So currently, both China and India are funding their local companies. That will only make their coming crash HARDER. Much Harder. And those that just left will find things are in far worse shape then they ever imagined.

    It sux that we are losing good ppl (I would rather that we got rid of illegals), but it is their choice.

  135. Get with the picture! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story sounds like some kind of bullshit. You can't convince me that anybody would actually, willingly, leave this country, now that we have the world's most popular President in American history, who also happens to be, by the way, the most competent, intelligent, caring, and effective of all the past presidents, not to mention the most honest. Yes I understand that there is an economic problem of historical proportions but you must understand that our President has been working overtime on it and I expect that with the enormous measures he's succeeded in taking and in so short an amount of time, this country will see not only a full recovery in the coming weeks, but will actually jump ahead much further than any country has in history. The Dow was at 14,000, now it's at 7,000, and everyone is dumping their stocks and fleeing the country. Just wait. I give it six weeks and the Dow will be over 20,000, there will be such a surplus of jobs that even janitors will be able to demand huge pay increases, and guess what, all these people who are dumping their stocks will wish they hadn't, and all those leaving this country will beg and plead to get back in. Never in the history of this country has there been a President more competent and qualified to lead. It's a good thing he got in when he did. If anybody else had won the election in such dire times, this country would have totally fallen apart by now.

  136. Actually by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    neo-cons are not the problem. In fact, neo-cons are the ones that ramped up H1B and illegals. W pushed ICE to ignore Illegals for 7 years. Dems are also not the problem. They LOVE illegals in hopes of increasing their votes.

    The problem is the average person. Most ppl see the problems with illegals taking jobs and not paying taxes (lot more than most realize). That needs to stop.
    Sadly, most ppl hear about the abuses of H1B and never think about the positives. Rather than worry about bringing ppl here, I would like to see us offer H1Bs and perhaps citizenship to those that have had Secondary education in US. If they have been here for 4 years, they know a lot already about being here.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  137. True, but... by weston · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, it would increase the supply of skilled labor, thus reducing cost of labor across he board for those skilled positions. The immigrants would get paid less, and non-immigrant (native/already naturalized labor) would also get paid less.

    Thus decreasing the economic advantage of pursuing science or engineering as a career, especially relative to law, management, or finance.

    Thus leading to fewer US natives pursuing an education in these fields...

    Which is fine, more or less, I suppose. Deciding to import your technical talent is one way to do things, as long as you have more money than everybody else.

    The problem is what happens when these other places can afford to keep their talent at home... while, in the meanwhile, we've let the cultivation of domestic talent languish.

    1. Re:True, but... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Thus decreasing the economic advantage of pursuing science or engineering as a career, especially relative to law, management, or finance.

      What's to say those professions don't also need to go through the same re-adjustment?

      There's already a big surplus of management professionals, and hire rates and salaries reflect that... and it will get worse in a couple years -- have you seen the recent application & enrollment figures for MBAs? Through the roof! It appears lots of laid-off professionals decided to go back to school and get that advanced degree they've been putting off for so long.

      Finance? I'm in the finance field, and if you don't think we face stiff competition from labor overseas that is limiting salaries... well... feel free to continue thinking that.

      At any rate, if students flee to other professions, those professions will also experience labor oversupply.

      Seriously, the US needs an across-the-board standard of living adjustment, and if it begins in a couple industries, it will trickle up/down the vertical and also horizontally to other industries. This is painful but necessary.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  138. Calm the fuck down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, man. You're getting all worked up about his estimate that the "average age" of H1-Bs coming into the country. Look at how much you typed before basically stating "[citation needed]". It was an estimate. You didn't need to type a 12 page double spaced essay on the subject. You could've proved he was wrong by now if you wanted to.

  139. Right to Live and Freedom of Speech by nixish · · Score: 0

    I am an international student studying Electrical Engineering in the west coast and over the course of five years, I have been here, two things that has struck me about the US system, more than anything else, is how the rights of an individual are respected and freedom of speech. And That is the tipping point for my wish to live here and nothing else. Money here, you can earn relatively more but I plan to live here and spend most of it here so that's a non-issue. If I go back, my life will be much easier. I have a big house (near the Himalayas), great food and lovely people. But even though life here is much harder, I like the principles that this country stands on. I do plan to go back , temporarily or permanents, I don't know. But this country respects human life, on aggregate, much more than any other country which you can see by just observing the laws. And likewise, freedom of speech is very much important for human society as a whole to progress and the US is ahead by a lot in this regard. Even though I am not American, I think US rocks.

  140. Let them go. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B visa is a scam to undercut U.S. labor. Employers want people to work for minimum wage while they themselves make millions.

  141. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She wants to be either a mathematician or a novelist. It would not surprise me if she became both.

    I knew this would happen someday:
    "And what did you see when you opened the door?"
    "I saw him come out of the apartment holding a bloody knife, completely irrational"
    "When you say him, you refer to..?"
    "The defendant, sqrt(2)"

  142. Re:Let them go by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

    It's about time we make some room for real US citizens. There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    I'm a foreigner ( or rather, I'm not an American... I'm not a foreigner here because I'm in my home country ), and I have a job working for a US corporation. The plan was to bring me to the US to work, which would mean spending my money in US businesses, paying US taxes, and just generally propping up the US economy.

    What actually happened was the hoops were such a pain in the ass, that I work for the same company, the same pay, the same job, except all the ( previously inside America ) money that I make goes to propping up foreign business, paying foreign taxes, etc.

    My entire salary is now removed from the USA, and you guys ( Americans ) don't get to see a cent of it back except for the odd purchase I make of a US built or designed product.

  143. Sad to see this day. by jcr · · Score: 1

    I've been saying for years when people around me bitched about immigrants, that the time to worry about the USA is when people don't want to stay here anymore.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Sad to see this day. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      This story just appeared on BBC News. A Mexican arrived at Manchester Airport from Los Angeles, and was stopped by the UK Border Agency. He admitted planning to settle in the UK, and to bring his family over from the USA.

  144. Re:Let them go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they can make more foreigners.
    They can start by making feel like foreigner to some people that are not.

    Some time later, they will be.

  145. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  146. The REAL Wasp... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a White Protestant guy with Anglo-Saxon lineage?

    I don't get it. Weren't the Angles and Saxons European, Teutonic tribes and thus, by definition, White? Or do you also have Blue, Red and Green Anglo-Saxons over there in America?

  147. Thank American Public Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The American public education system was designed and instituted to achieve exactly this result - to produce "citizens", not to educate children.

    That might sound like wingnut tinfoil hat conpiracy drivel, but the people responsible (Henry James, John Dewey, etc.) not only didn't try to hide the fact - they were quite proud of it. If you read their own original work from the time describing their plans, they're very overt about what they wanted to accomplish.

    Hint: It wasn't teaching children critical thinking skills and independent self-sufficiency.

  148. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Indian author of the article should go home as well.

  149. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by javiercero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With my condolences to the Monty Python:

    Damn right. Besides weekends, what has organized labor done for us?

    OK, OK...

    Besides weekends AND vacations, what has organized labor done for us?

    Hum, what... OK

    Besides weekends, vacations AND paid leave, what has organized labor done for us?

    Really? No kidding... OK

    Besides weekend, vacation, paid leave AND fair salaries, what has organized labor done for us?

    For real?

    Besides weekends, vacation, paid leave, fair salaries AND safe working conditions, what has organized labor done for us?

    What? Really... OK OK

    Besides weekends, vacations, paid leave, fair salaries, safe working conditions AND retirements, what has organized labor done for us?

    Huh? come on... OK OK

    Besides weekends, vacations, paid leave, fair salaries, safe working conditions, retirement, AND medical coverage, what has organized labor done for us?

    Yeah... what a bunch of dicks!

  150. Oh come on! by goldcd · · Score: 1

    My post was not a troll, just a brief summary of 90% of the posts beneath the story (at the time), I was interested enough to click upon.
    I was expecting a few trolls, but not that many.
    As some of the other posters have pointed out, the large number leaving is probably due to the increase difficulty in recent graduates getting US jobs, combined with better opportunities available in their home/other country.
    Having known many forgeign students, this 'go home' attitude really grates. These are not stupid people. These are people who've scrimped, saved, had parents and family take out massive loans to pay for their education. They emerge as extremely high tax net-contributors and then suddenly find themselves.... oh I give up.
    Mark this up as a troll as well for all I care.

  151. Re:sounds like a good argument for more immigratio by WetCat · · Score: 1

    No. It's actually extremely hard both for employer and for the H-1b to successfully apply and get GreenCard now. The process is much more harder than to get H-1b. Easier to leave the country, especially if you are almost sure that to find another good job will be tough.

  152. Re:Let them go by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    Actually, you can't.

    As an American all you can do is make more Americans.

    And recent American policy abroad seems to be aimed more at reducing the numbers of foreigners.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  153. No wonder... by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    Nearly 10 years ago I was in California for a while, on an H-1B visa.
    While the people are very nice, it was rather nasty comparing that place to Europe (Germany, to be more exact - I'm currently living in Munich).

    Medical aid was a mess: when you show up, you have to pay first. No pay, no service. Forgot your wallet at home? Tough luck.
    And that was one of the better clinics - I brought somebody to one of the poorer hospitals. First in one queue, then the next. Both take about 2h, and it's not nice watching that bleeding guy after the motorbike accident being held upright by his friends for these four hours...

    Work is a mess. Very few vacation days (two weeks? I get about 30 work days over here!). Sickness days? If I'm sick for more than, what, 12 days, I don't get paid?
    Can be fired at any moment, getting lousy support (if any) from the state?

    No thanks. No wonder smart people leave after a while. ...however: for two years, Germany has the highest migration rate since the second world war. Apparently our problems are similar to yours, after all. Wonder where they're all going?

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  154. I'm an immigrant who left by Nyenyec · · Score: 2

    I worked for 6 years at a US research institute on an academic H1B. I got a new job offer and would have loved to stay but couldn't get a commercial H1B (lost in the H1B visa lottery: my chances were 1 in 3).

    So I moved to Switzerland last year. I'm still working for an American company, but I won't pay any taxes, buy products or use services in the US any more. And a US citizen still won't have my job, it went overseas.

    If the US decreases the H1B cap even more, you'll see more stories like this. You can't keep jobs in America this way.

  155. Help! Foreign US PhDs stuck in India over H1B! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so glad that this news is FINALLY hitting the circuit. I have a PhD from the US and have been stuck in India for almost 3 months waiting for a visa stamp on an *approved* H1-B petition.

    Me and MANY others (US-eductated Indian born scientists) have been stuck in India for more than 3 months. All of us have excellent jobs at National Labs, Universities, and Research Labs.

    Discussion forum for PhDs stuck awaiting Visas on approved petitions

    Our visas were "conditionally accepted", pending a Security review, since we work in fields which fall under the Technology Alert List.

    Technologies Alert List

    The problem? The security review is a process without any end date. All our inquiries are being rebuffed by the Department of State saying that this process is critical to National Security.

    Excuse me? We have lived in United States for more then 5 years (min. required for a PhD). Just because we came back to India during the Christmas holidays, we are a National security risk? That is just sooo ridiculous. Some folks (as you will read on the forum) have LOST THEIR JOBS!

    The topic of the story should really read "United States driving out Foreign born US-educated Scientists". That is what is happening on the ground here. I cannot believe it, its surreal to me.

  156. They are NON IMMIGRANTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is time for them to go home.

    American professionals are not even given the opportunity to compete for jobs in their own country. They are being removed as competition in any market... Americans will NEVER LOSE the ability to compete as we are the best.. we are just being removed from the competition due to bias and discrimination. They can't compete.. so instead, they just exclude us.

    It is time for the foreign NON IMMIGRANTS to return to their respective homeland and allow Americans to do what they do best. Lets stop pandering to the cheap labor lobby and the NSF. There is no shortage of American talent, just a shortage of American talent who will work for nothing while being treated like slaves.

    The economy has a lot more to do with these cheap labor programs and the offshoring of jobs than the government will admit to. They legislated us into this crisis. It is time for them to legislate us back into gainful employment by the removal of all imports on NON IMMIGRANT VISAS.

  157. Every culture needs to be watered sometimes by realxmp · · Score: 1

    No culture is perfect, and unless you import new ideas it will inevitably stagnate. Surprisingly what made your nation great was immigrants and the fact you ended up with such a blend of cultures that innovation was inevitable. Your uneducated Saharan refugee may only seem to contribute cheap labor, but you can be sure as hell his culture and pride will mean he won't be a drain on your welfare system. As for his entire family, the next generation they'll grow up with a blend of US culture and their own and you'll end up with cultural renewal.

  158. Re:Let them go by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing special about the foreigners. We can make more.

    Well, not exactly. THEY can make more. If we make them, they're not foreigners.

    While that is true; making more requires actually knowing, very intimately, a member of the opposite sex. This being slashdot; well, you get the idea...

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  159. Spouse visas is a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One huge problem with US visas is the way spouses are treated. Usually highly educated people pair up with other highly educated people who rather not spend their time doing nothing else but laundry.

    I happen to be from northern Europe and I am doing my Ph.D. at Yale. However, my wife has a degree from Oxford and is working in Switzerland which is a rather big strain on our relationship. She now has a good job meaning that I will be going away from the US the second I graduate. We probably would have stayed in the US had she been able to get a job there, but the only visa she would be able to get was an F2 which forbids all work.

    An H1B visa is always possible, but as it's lottery based (if you don't want to work for non-profits) it's very hard to get.

  160. A post from an Indian .... by sureshgn · · Score: 1

    I am an Indian, and I have some news that I thought /. folks would already know, but somehow don't really pick up on. The salaries in India for folks at the top end of the market are equal or higher (after taxes) to the salaries you get paid as an Indian on a green card, and way higher than you get on an H1-B. In the last 6 or seven years, nearly all my friends who I consider top of the game in their respective fields; software, hardware R&D, banking, management consulting and senior corporate management; have all moved back to India.

    For the salary that gets them a tiny flat in a crime ridden suburb of Jersey or LA, they can get a house, two cars with drivers, 3 servants; and get to stay near the kids grandparents so they can actually go out if they want to. Many of these people are US citizens already, or green card holders. Many folks actually let their green cards lapse because they are so sure they are not coming back.

    The main reason Indians move out are today are 1) they can't beat the system in India and move up high enough or 2) they are so fed up of politics and bad infrastructure that they want to get away. The US is NOT the most common destination for these folks. People who want to emigrate for good have been moving to Canada, New Zeland and the Far East. Many moved to Dubai and other Middle East countries now that you can stay there for life. It's only a percentage of techies and senior management types who did move here to do their post grad work or earn MBA's. With the cost of college tuition going up, and chance of scholarships going down, that percentage is going to drop.

    There are still 65,000 people apply for H1-B VISA's every year, I do agree. Out of a population of 1 billion, that's not a high percentage. Also, if you've spent the last 3 years slogging it out to finish college, you are out of the loop back in India, and the thought of competing with the huge numbers back home can be scary. So they put in an H1-B petition so they can avoid the competition. A backdoor start if you will. A very large percentage of these really don't want to live here for the rest of their lives (nor will be allowed to by their parents)

    On a related note - I do agree with most posters here that a vast majority of Indian programmers who you get to work with suck. On behalf of my fellow Indians, I apologize for foisting these bozos on you. But you were suckers enough to pay for them and - Caveat Emptor and all that. You should really have been paying more attention during the interviews. There are some great programmers out there - and I consider myself one of them. When you buy in bulk, you are going to get some rotten fruit with the good stuff. Spend a little more time and shop around - and you can cherry pick the best. If you did not do that, or get your organization to do that - you will, unfortunately get ripped off. I, for one, always tip over the strawberry boxes to look at the bottom row that's hidden under the juicy ones. If you find a shop that never has ones with fungus and frost damage in the bottom row, let me know.

  161. Beresovsky knew how this works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beresovsky, one of the Russian oligarchs who fled the country after amassing billions of dollars worth of assets which previously belonged to the state, famously once described the process of shifting the state owned business into private hands. He said there were three steps involved in the process.

    1) Export the profits: he gave as an example a state car factory which produces cars at a cost of $10000 each which then sells them to the state distributor for $11000, which then sells them to the public for $11000.

    Berezovsky's private distribution network would negotiate to buy the cars from the state car producer for $9000 and sell them to the public for $10000 - the result, the profit is now in the private distributor and the state company is taking the loss. The profit has been shifted from the state car producer to the private distributor.

    How to achieve this? By smart negotiating and by having your own people on the inside of the state company.

    2) Now that the profits are in the hands of the private distributor, they use the money to buy the assets of the state manufacturer.

    3) Before long the private company has all the money, and all the assets. All that is left to do is to buy the company, which having few assets and little profit, is available at a knock down price.

    There is a similar process going on in the US and western nations in general.The export of knowledge is one part of that process.

  162. Can hardly blame them by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The INS Dehumanization of Foreigners Act is to blame. OK, so I joke, but having worked on a project in the US for a few years (before returning home). Here's my experience of the visa process.

    First I was on an L1 as an intracompany transferee. I wasn't cheap to my company either - they did indeed pay the prevailing wage, and on top of that, a substantial international service allowance that paid all of my living expenses and then some (the ISA was something like double my actual basic living expenses). Since they are a big firm and have many people working in many different countries, they have a whole department that looks after people on international service. This department does things like visa paperwork. They are very experienced with it.

    However, my visa application was refused (section 224g IIRC, "insufficient information") and the US Embassy demanded that I go and have a visa interview at the embassy. The ream of paperwork, incidentally, was filled out just like they had been doing successfully for some months - but they explained to me that every so often the embassy staff changes, and some new footling jobsworth rule changes, and they just start bouncing applications. I was just unlucky enough to hit a staff change. So I go up to London, where you have to line up outside the embassy at the crack of dawn for a good hour or so. Then you have to line up to get a delicatessen style ticket. Then you sit down and wait, while they call numbers.

    You can't read a book while they are doing this - the numbers are called in seemingly random sequence, and you just know after your initial experience already with the embassy if you are reading, and miss your number, they won't call it again and you'll get sent home to repeat the experience some weeks later. So you sit and get bored. If you do decide to read, they have these "newspapers" around called something like "Going USA". The first half of which bizarrely seems to be dedicated to how terrible your own country is, how great the USA is, and what a good time your country folk are having running gas stations in Florida. The second half of the "newspaper" is dedicated to how they aren't going to give you a visa anyway.

    Anyhow, after 4 hours, my number came up. The guy asked me a single question - what are the dates of service with your company? I told him. He said, "That's great, you'll get your passport back in about a week". They could have asked me that over the phone and saved me a completely unproductive day (and a great deal of expense). Now I have no quarrel with the guy who did the "interview" at the embassy, he was perfectly courteous and polite. But the whole bureaucratic machine is a red-taped mess.

    I had a second run-in with the Embassy's bureaucratic machine again when my visa got extended. It was actually approved by the INS in the United States, all I needed to do was if I went back home on a trip, was to get the new visa stuck in my passport. The Embassy literally had nothing to do other than print the thing as it was already approved. There was another form to fill in for the Embassy (which merely duplicated all the information the INS already had when they approved the new visa), so I filled this in, sent it and the paperwork from the INS in the USA to the Embassy. They refused my new visa! My new pre-approved visa! Why? Because the form was out of date. So I downloaded the new form off the Embassy website and it was...exactly..the..same....as...the...one I sent, apart from the date at the bottom. Exactly the same. This bureaucratic stupidity cost me another couple of days as the new paperwork had to make yet another round trip.

    Now I'm not singling out the USA here. My current next door neighbour is Albanian - she's very smart, has an engineering degree, and fluently speaks English, German and French (and of course Albanian). But the British embassy treated her like a liar and criminal - they were deliberately extremely unpleasant, rude and aggressive to her face (and indeed, she wouldn't have come here if it wasn't

  163. Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, what a shame!! It's too bad that no one smart was ever born in the United States. Without the "genius" immigrants from other countries we'd all be picking our noses and living in mud huts. Tell me more Slashdot readers. Tell me all about how the world works from the perspective of your parents basement or your WoW client.

  164. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    David Lister would be ashamed...
    that one is for you Svlad

  165. that is a... by deepsight · · Score: 1

    smart move

  166. Acutally it works great for the banks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The banks have gotten so bloated from mergers and acquisitions that they can hold the whole country hostage with the threat of collapsing. They used that to get a $800+ Billing in free, no strings attached tax payer money.

  167. Smart immigration / trade policy by z80kid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    You demonstrate an unsurpassed lack of understanding of macro-economics. If the labor is expensive, than pray thee, how do you make american products compete in the international market?

    You don't compete.

    The only way you can reasonably compete with someone in a third world country who lives in a plywood shack and eats a bowl of rice a day is if you are willing to live the same lifestyle.

    In an International economy, money is a bit like water. It's always going to roll down to the low points. While it's true that this has the advantage of raising the standard of living at the low end, it also decreases it at the high end. This is why there are borders and tariffs - to build a dam between economies that regulates the flow.

    I've seen more than a few sentimental references to that poem on the statue in NY harbor. That poem was put there during the immigration boom of the early 20th century. Recall that during those years, we had low wages and abuse of workers on a massive scale. We tried to patch it then (and ever since) by running in circles passing more and more regulations on business. By nature, regulations limit freedoms and cost money to enforce. It could have (and still can) be done another way.

    The real problem was that jobs and applicants are a supply and demand market. The demand for workers was finite, but the supply was unlimited. So a worker's value (to the company) was near zero. In a more balanced economy where the labor supply was closer to demand, employers would have had to make some reasonable concessions. But they were under no such pressure.

    What's needed is a sensible trade and immigration policy - one that balances immigration with the job market, and prevents us from competing openly with countries who do not share our standard of living. Yes, it's true that prices would go up without cheap imports. But wages would hold too and we would have a balance.

  168. Education and Research by hackus · · Score: 1

    The united states became the worlds dominant technological power house through the exercise of liberal education benefits. Unlike Europe and a lot of countries you could become educated with fairly modest means if you are willing to work.

    Many nations have very strict rules about how people should learn and ultimately those who may be intelligent, do not get to participate.

    This I believe is what attracts and large number of people here.

    The executive management of many companies avoid paying taxes, take our University research and then export the manufacturing and knowledge to other countries like clock work.

    In affect, the US Tax payer is paying to fund the industrial and research bases of foreign countries for one reason only: Greed.

    These sorts of practices destroy our industrial base and the ability of people to become employed and buy things and pay taxes to fund more University research and access to education.

    I don't mind if people come here, but I do mind how our policies of Globalization are destroying the technological and industrial bases this country once had by moving everything out of the country.

    I mean is it any wonder now that the middle class has collapsed in the USA, that nobody can buy anything? Nobody can find a job because all of the manufacturing base has left the country.

    Even with this downturn, China's economy will continue to grow at around 3-5% per year because they have all of the industrial base including research and manufacturing.

    First thing we need to do is to restore our industrial base and actually make things here. That is what creates jobs.

    But, I do not see anyone discussing that course of action.

    Instead, all I see is our government destroying our currency by printing huge sums of money so people here can keep Chinese industrial base alive by buying Chinese stuff.

    That is NOT going to help our long term employment problem, or restore the middle class in this country which now, sadly doesn't even exist.

    We need to stop this insane practice for example, of building all of these high tech chip fabrication plants over seas and build them here and make CHINA buy our stuff, not the other way around.

    Our exports relative to imports is WAY way WAY out of whack.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Education and Research by synthespian · · Score: 1

      The united states became the worlds dominant technological power house through the exercise of liberal education benefits. Unlike Europe and a lot of countries you could become educated with fairly modest means if you are willing to work.

      Bullshit. A lot of countries have public education systems where anyone that's busted his balls in school can get in, even get a medical or engineering degree in the best of schools.

      I know many such people - guys who came from simple families and now are out of life of travail that their parents were in. I'm talking getting out of practically a peasant's life and landing a job in engineering in a top corporation.

      In the US, only the elite gets into Ivy League colleges. You just don't know enough about the world, that's why you say those things. Think about some of the Chinese PhD student that gets to work on on the largest tech firms in the US. Do you think he came form a wealthy family back in China? Or India? What are the odds they are self-made through their educational effort? Compare it with the typical Caltech, Harvard, Yale, etc. student. A lot of them are 4th generation Harvard students, etc., and come from wealthy families, obscene wealth when you compare them with their Indian, Chinese, etc. colleagues.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  169. No Pakistanis in nuclear engineering? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    But-but-but-but!!! Where will they get their underpaid graduate students, unwilling to report nuclear material handling violations and willing to ignore exposure guidelines, just so that they can take home that knowledge of nuclear weapons to Pakistans, where they can spread it to our partners like Iran and North Korea?

    Ordinarily, I'd think that was a racist comment, but I actually saw this occurring in the nuclear engineering department of my city's best engineering school 20 years ago, and it was pretty frightening. It stopped when the Army visited the nuclear facility on an inspection tour and a US general expressed his deep concerns. And yes, the department had to shift a lot of its handling of students to get US students after that, improving their safety, doing less obviously military work, and being much more aware of where these nuclear experts might go with their educations and their access to classified research materials.

  170. A Metre is a pretty odd unit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes that is pretty weird. We use Meters over here.

    1. Re:A Metre is a pretty odd unit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The French invented it so they get to also invent the "correct" spelling.

  171. Excuse me? by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    "the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the US economy and to business and job growth"

    What we need in this world is fewer overpaid managers. Who do you think is authorizing massive bonuses despite profit loss in these large corporations? That's right, management. Who does the least amount of the down and dirty work, managers. Who typically has the highest payroll? Management. Who typically wants to find the cheapest workforce and lacks general understanding of their projects? Management!

    Workers I will take, educated people willing to earn a good pay (stressing the earn), but I have no use for managers or people that did nothing to learn a trade fully first before seeing the end of the rainbow by trying to START in management.

  172. They will be back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Once they spend a few years in their native land they will realize what they gave up when they left.

    They will be back, trust me. I have seen it dozens of times.

  173. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    I have relatives that are or were UAW auto workers and it is unbelievable how slack their jobs are or what nonsense the hard core slackers can get away with.

    I totally believe you. On the same subject, my relatives are among the ten richest kings of Europe, and you'd be surprised at what slackers they are!

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  174. Do we not have any smarts here? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Is that to say now we are f*cked because we don't have any "american" doctors, or engineers available...who cares if they go back to their country, it is not like we have only idiots here, we have Bush for Christ's sake, we will be alright! Yeeeeha!

  175. Why the gloom and doom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as we retain the bright minds we have in Wall St, this country will be fine :)

  176. Author is Well Known Indian by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 1

    The person who wrote the article is hardly unbiased. He's merely trumpeting his own country. Not convincing.

  177. You are misinformed by mario_grgic · · Score: 2, Informative

    At least people can get US citizenship, they only need to live and work in the states 3 years.

    Compare that with say Germany where you have to live 8 years and you may never get citizenship.

    Or Switzerland, where people in your community vote on you and if you should be allowed to get citizenship. So don't piss your neighbors off ever.

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  178. Professors by Khaloroma · · Score: 1

    Maybe this will mean that there will be more college professors able to speak comprehensible English, and thus bring up the overall intelligence of our own collegiate population.

  179. japanese and complaining of xenophobia? Hah. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    You know, I don't like to be treated as a criminal by default when visiting a foreign country

    According to whois, you live in Japan. Which has probably been the most xenophobic country in the last 500-1000 years. It's still culturally acceptable, if not expected, to refer to foreigners as gaijin- and god help you if you're Asian but not Japanese. Please tell me how many non-Japanese people you se on your way to work today? Uh huh- your country is one of the least racially-integrated on the planet.

    Wikipedia says Japan in the 80's tortured prisoners (held for 72 hours, then another 10 days without any charges, all in line with your constitution) to extract confessions- and in the 70's, suspects were tortured until they signed blank confessions. We've had trial-by-jury for 200 years; you had it for 20 years around 1920, and now you're just finally getting it back.

    Shall we go into freedom of the press? http://www.google.com/search?q=japan+media+blackout

    ...so pardon me if I say a giant "what the fuck?" to you complaining about the US being a "police state" or US xenophobia.

    I was looking forward to go back to the US and see NYC (I liked Massachusetts).

    You might want to try getting your geography straight- NYC is in NY, not Massachusetts.

    Then again, I watched with amazement as an ABC reporter said he was in NY and then said "Here in New England..."

    New York state never has, and never will be, part of New England. It's MA, RI, VT, NH, ME.

  180. I feel your pain... by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1

    I went through an immigration nightmare. My Green Card had been temporary for 5 years (legally it should be all done in 2 years). My service center was in Nebraska and the correspondence with them showed me that the people writing do not have a clue of basic English grammar. Moreover, once I called the "hotline" and someone with a thick Indian accent answered (did they outsource immigration too?). My file kept getting lost, I had to travel 6 to 10 hours several times to go to an immigration office and submit address and phone number in person. Last summer my case was declined again (for the 3rd time) because they claimed they did not have a way to contact me (after 5 TIMES I submitted my address). Fortunately for me I kept all correspondence showing that they were sending me letters therefore they HAD my address. When I asked for specific questions they never replied with a specific answer just an envelope with no date and no return address saying "your file is here" (more or less). Then my name was screwed up, I had to submit documents to have my name corrected. Finally after last rejection I got tired and went to my senator's office and complained, bringing all evidence. Within 2 days my permanent green card was issued, valid for 10 years. And guess what? It came with my name screwed up in the same way that it was the first time.

  181. even Obama is the son of immigrant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in nowadays, the superpower should be the super-brain power.

  182. Re:The Truth Behind the Trolling by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    I'm not in management, but a good manager can make the difference between a bunch of brilliant people producing fantastic work and a bunch of brilliant people producing nothing. Whether they managers themselves are "more intelligent" or not isn't relevant.

    And guess what? If your brilliant people are diverse, it sometimes helps to have diverse managers.

  183. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon. RTFA. These people contacted people through their linkedin profiles, then concluded they were more technically savvy than the average person.

    It's nonsense like this that makes me conclude sociology is bs

  184. Re:Let them go by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

    Personally, I think we should restrict immigration from other states. I'm sick of those Texans coming here and taking Californian jobs.

  185. Don't worry be Happy- We have "Change".... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama will have a solution. It won't actually be anything tangible but it sure will sound impressive.

  186. desireable students... by bahamuut · · Score: 1

    "dding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country. "

    well if this holds true, then there should be plenty of room in the masters and phd programs for good ol' americans, wait, the average american public school student isn't prepared for college nevermind a masters or phd progam? the only higher level education that is still dominated by american students is law? oh.

    -my point is that there needs to be a very concentrated effort to improve lower levels of education in this country so that they can even qualify as a "desireable" student!
    I really don't think that that's gonna happen because this economy revolves around the ignorance and inaction of others.

    --
    like a man without arms, you can't hang......
  187. Poor hiring is irrelevant to immigration. by raehl · · Score: 2

    I've been party to both positive and negative foreign worker experiences.

    I've had the privilege of working with a lot of extremely qualified, foreign-born engineers. Some from Europe, some from Asia. They're no different than American workers - you have to interview effectively to make sure you hire the best people. If you don't hire the best people, you're going to get bad people. Of all the foreign workers I've worked with, only one has not been worth his salary.

    So if the foreign workers your company hires are a waste of money, shame on your company for having a poor interview and review process. But that has nothing to do with immigration - a nice talking kid from US engineering college could do just as much exaggeration and get hired at the same company.

    On the strongly negative front, we outsourced part of a project once. Needed it done ASAP. Contracted a company in India to do it. Waste of money. Got zero value out of it. Just couldn't do effective management/quality control over half the globe and 12 time zones.

    Anyway, if your company is hiring unqualified employees, that's a hiring problem, not an immigration problem.

  188. Re:japanese and complaining of xenophobia? Hah. by gknoy · · Score: 1

    New York state never has, and never will be, part of New England. It's MA, RI, VT, NH, ME.

    While that is technically true (at least according to Wikipedia), for a large portion of the rest of the world, it's pretty much Close Enough. Similarly, Arizona and Nevada are technically not the "west coast", but from the perspective of someone on the eastern side of our nation, it's pretty close.

  189. Good post, bad title by NickGnome · · Score: 1

    Yes, we can compete, so long as force and fraud are discouraged. When someone starts talking about "best and brightest" while hiring the cheapest and most easily brow-beaten, something's amiss. If it were really about "the best and brightest" there would be an IQ test. I'm thinking something along the lines of a score of at least 180 on multiple tests, or ACT aggregate of 32, or SAT of 1400 or better, or the equivalent for GREs. As to the inherited title, the USA is already over-crowded. You can see the cracks (some of them literal) in the infrastructure systems: water, toxic waste clean-up, electricity systems, roads, bridges, locks and dams, schools... not to mention the vast pool of unemployed and under-employed US citizens who are bright, knowledgeable, creative, industrious STEM workers. Every couple weeks I get an e-mail response from another "recruiter" saying that none of their clients are willing to relocate candidates within the USA. The job ads are mostly for body shopping (temp and "services") and few for real, full-time permanent (or long-term) employment making software and hardware products. Few ads include e-mail addresses. Nearly all are so inundated with applicants that they run inquiries through resume parsers to grab random buzz-words and dump them into data-bases, instead of conscientiously and actively reading resumes, talking with applicants and matching able and willing people with the work to be done. There's not a "Jerry Maguire" or even a "Dave" out there, and I don't think there have been since before those movies were made. (Then again, a lot of the projects I hear enthusiastically touted, even in radio ads recently, involve massive rights violations, most notably privacy violations, tracking individuals, etc. Why would they expect any self-respecting US citizen to aid and abet such abuse?)

  190. Give us your tired, your poor, your stupid... by dbdweeb · · Score: 1

    Inscription for the statue of bondage.

  191. Defining the word "contribute" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. unemployment rate is rising, meaning there are fewer and fewer jobs available. You may be willing and able to contribute and pay taxes, but so are about 20 million other people in this country.

    Yeah, those 20 million are our finest representatives of our breeding welfare system. They're contributing alright, on the wrong side of the balance sheet.

  192. Value of citizenship. by geekmux · · Score: 1

    And frankly, US citizenship is not so valuable that it should be dramatically harder to obtain than an EU, UK, or Australian citizenship. But it is.

    If it isn't, then why are the majority of them still coming here?

  193. What a PITA by synthespian · · Score: 1

    What shocks me every time I stand on the US customs line is how come it's so fucking easy for complete losers to simply immigrate to the US (where they'll do any menial job that's available), while if you're a scientist, engineer or a doctor (that is, you have a lot to loose with immigration - but also a lot to gain), it's a complete PITA to simply become a US resident/worker?

    Same thing in Europe. Boat people simply immigrate. Engineers, scientists and other highly qualified workers etc. must face a veritable via crucis.

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  194. PhD obsession by fitzsimj · · Score: 1

    > precisely the kind of people who make the greatest contribution to the US economy and to business and job growth.

    Am I the only one who doesn't understand the PhD obsession?

    I sort of feel like it's the people with ingenuity, insight, and an ability get things done who make the greatest contribution to the US economy. Those qualities may or may not be found in a single person, and that person may or may not have a PhD.

  195. Plenty o' that in Nigeria. Visa for everything. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding to the brain drain is a problem with slow US visa processing, since last November or so, that has been driving desirable students and scientists out of the country.

    I hear those passive agressive women are hot under that africkan sun, so that's maybe why the plastic numbers on the Visas cards prevent them from so much fraud so they need an EPIC marketing feature to ask for them more than once. That's why I use the new Slashdot Card because together we can give too many of them without anyone even asking, overwhelming the center of all their card processing.

  196. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  197. Re:japanese and complaining of xenophobia? Hah. by ag0ny · · Score: 1

    According to whois, you live in Japan.

    You took the time to check the whois info of my domain. You REALLY should have taken a look at my site too. Then you would have seen that I'm not Japanese. I'm Spanish, and quite happy living here.

    ...Japan. Which has probably been the most xenophobic country in the last 500-1000 years. It's still culturally acceptable, if not expected, to refer to foreigners as gaijin- and god help you if you're Asian but not Japanese. Please tell me how many non-Japanese people you se on your way to work today?

    Not counting myself, there are 10-12 other non-Japanese sitting close to me right now (we're around 70 people on this floor). But perhaps this is a bad example, since after all I'm working for an American company.

    Most of my friends here are foreigners, many of them American. And so far I haven't heard anything about any of them having any issues here, just the opposite.

    You might want to try getting your geography straight- NYC is in NY, not Massachusetts.

    My geography is fine, thank you. I stayed in Boston / Massachusetts when I was visiting the MIT.

  198. not close enough for us. by SuperBanana · · Score: 1

    While that is technically true (at least according to Wikipedia), for a large portion of the rest of the world, it's pretty much Close Enough.

    Try that argument on someone from Ireland and see how well they react to being described as "British."

  199. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  200. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  201. Serving curry might be your future job by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
    Burger flipping for American consumers makes money when Americans have money.

    In the future you might find yourself serving curry to Indians or sushi to Japanese, or whatever, depending on who has the money and is prepared to offer a pathetic Westerner such as yourself a menial service job.

    Times change and those that don't realize that are going to struggle.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  202. Re: By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    H1-B wages are not the problem. By law, an employer is required to pay H1-B at least as much or more than the US market average for the given position.

    But this is America - the only people required to obey the law are American citizens who fall into the category of "employee" or "unemployed".

    Obeying that particular law is...ummm...unpopular. See http://www.eetimes.com/news/latest/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=189401976/, as just one of many similar sources.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  203. What are you complaining about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can always go back to your home country if you don't like it in the U.S. I know it might really suck for you to leave the U.S. and go back to your home country but they NEED you back home so please just go and do something good for your home country people besides coming on here complaining about us.

  204. Too confusing for you? by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    Yes that is pretty weird. We use Meters over here.

    Everyone uses meters like voltmeters, ammeters etc. A meter is simply a device that measure something. Perhaps that's why you found metres the unit too confusing and stuck to using yards, inches, furlongs etc.?

  205. For the jobs. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Many people would be very happy to keep their citizenship, but that would mean an eternal threat of deportation, specially during xenophobic fests (like during recessions).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  206. Why do we need to theorize about all this? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    All this has been tried and tested: welcome to the European Union.

    People in rich countries used to say pretty much the same as you uninformed rant, what happened is that after an initial influx from people from richer countries (both skilled and unskilled, because people don't move because they are "losers", they move because the incentives elsewhere are better, hardly a losers' attitude), the flux died out, immigrants became wealthier and were able to support the economy back home.

    Free movement of people paired with free trade made poorer countries richer, up to the point that there is no immigration to former richer countries anymore.

    The UK, Germany and France were not overrun by Spanish, Portuguese and Greek immigrants, nowadays these countries are prosperous and have now an "immigration problem" of their own.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  207. Lower cost developers can be better. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Any developer, from lets say Mexico, has gone through 5 years of very rigorous University education (I know, I fare quite well against people educated in good UK universities).

    If I have stayed in Mexico, my salary would be peanuts compared to what somebody in a rich country earns.

    I would be a lo cost developer.

    But my the quality of my work is demonstrably on par with anybody else's from anywhere else in the world (I can say this with confidence after working in several countries in different continents).

    I was not even the smartest guy in my University for Pete's sakes.

    Projects that fail do so not because the people doing the work are not talented, they do so because management does not know what they are doing.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  208. And then the businesses and jobs follow by JimThink · · Score: 1

    Wait until the administration and congress raise taxes on 95% of the job-providers and producers of goods. Then the capital itself will begin moving overseas to countries with sufficient stability and more favorable tax policies.

  209. Holy shit, why didn't anybody think of that? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    You, sir, are a rare visionary. Such a simple and elegant solution! It seems obvious in retrospect.

    Genius! Pure genius!

  210. Confusing by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this is something that's really confused the heck out of me. I agree that the US needs more immigration (our birthrate is really low), so why not make our immigration laws more favorable to more productive, college-educated foreigners? You know, the ones that some other country paid to educate while we reap the benefits?

    Instead, we want to open up our borders to Mexican peasants. This does not make a great deal of sense to me.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  211. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  212. Re:japanese and complaining of xenophobia? Hah. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    New York was part of the Dominion of New England. York was in England. New York is considered to be part of "Greater New England"

    There are a lot of mitigating factors in mistakenly placing New York in New England.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
  213. With unemployment so high, why is this a surprise? by sideshow · · Score: 1

    So, unemployment is at 8,1% (highest since '83) and everyone is surprised H1-B's are going home?

     

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.