Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Poland Photoshops Black Guy To White One

wanted writes "If you look at Microsoft's Poland business solutions Web site, you will probably not notice anything odd about the main picture. However, when you compare it with the original English version, you can see that someone decided that showing black people in Poland is probably not going to be convincing to business. They just Photoshopped the head of a white guy in for the black one, in an amateurish way, leaving his hand unchanged. (Here's a mirror in case something should happen to the original.)" We noted a few months back that the city of Toronto had done something similar.

680 of 964 comments (clear)

  1. Dark Tan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps it was just a spray on tan?

    1. Re:Dark Tan? by mhlo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft Poland doesn't like black people.

    2. Re:Dark Tan? by Jurily · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft Poland doesn't like black people.

      That's not necessarily true. In Central Europe, nationalism is alive and well (actually increasing due to the perceived cultural threat from the EU), and a picture with three different skin colors for three people will not be interpreted as affirmative action, but unwanted external cultural influence.

      Particularly the black guy, as you don't expect to see black people every day.

      In Hungary, at least, the original picture would cause outrage from the far-right and a measurable decrease in sales.

    3. Re:Dark Tan? by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      or to paraphrase, "market to your demographic". If our customer base is white, show white people in the advertising.

      I've noticed that billboards in black neighbors show blacks. In Hispanic neighborhoods, they show Hispanics. etc, etc, etc.

      This was just a poor attempt at getting something out the door to fit the job, rather than doing another shoot with fresh models.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:Dark Tan? by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, all the black people living in Hungary would make up for the loss of sales. Right?
      Where are the chinese, mexican and native american people from the original? Heh?

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    5. Re:Dark Tan? by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Poland is anti-PC.

      (They're shooting themselves in the foot no matter how you read it).

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    6. Re:Dark Tan? by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Hmmm fish sticks http://thottbot.com/i27699 ...

      How embarrassing for Microsoft and why didn't they just take a new picture?

    7. Re:Dark Tan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's so badly photoshopped that they probably used paint...

    8. Re:Dark Tan? by hh4m · · Score: 5, Informative
    9. Re:Dark Tan? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Sad that that evidently works. I don't feel that I pay any more attention to ads with white people than black or some other race.

      I guess hot chicks and explosions is what they need to catch my attention.

    10. Re:Dark Tan? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I guess there aren't many asians either, but they left him in.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Dark Tan? by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Only took them about 8-10 hours after it was caught and posted on Fark and /b/. I guess that's not bad.

    12. Re:Dark Tan? by davidphogan74 · · Score: 1

      Then why did they keep the Asian guy, and the black hands?

    13. Re:Dark Tan? by Jurily · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, all the black people living in Hungary would make up for the loss of sales. Right?

      Yes, all three of them.

    14. Re:Dark Tan? by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      it's fairly obvious from your remark that you've never been to Hungary.

    15. Re:Dark Tan? by dajak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the issue is whether you are able to connect to a black man. The picture for a Pole just screams "foreign", since the picture is nonrepresentative for a Polish office setting, just like a picture of for instance a family in an American style kitchen wouldn't communicate "family" but again "foreign". To get the feeling you are trying to communicate across you need to localize.

    16. Re:Dark Tan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The original showed an Asian guy, a black guy and a white woman. How tediously politically correct. Also completely unrealistic for Poland. (Is it even realistic for the US?)

      I'm reminded of the original Mission Impossible series in the 60s. One agent, Barney, was black. He often was sent "undercover" to various (fictional) "Eastern Bloc" countries, and no one noticed, despite him being the only black guy in the whole city (well, we never saw any others).

    17. Re:Dark Tan? by kju · · Score: 4, Interesting

      ...and they failed! Apparently they were in such a hurry that they now forgot to enlarge the orange box behind the text (as they did with the modified picture).

      I wonder if nobody noticed that it looks totally awful.

    18. Re:Dark Tan? by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can't speak for Poland, but for the US... yes, it's realistic. I work for a company that does it's business over the internet and we've hired just about every 'race' you can imagine, and not because it's mandated. They were legitimately the right persons for the job. (Thank God we don't do any of the 'affirmative action' bullshit. It's just as racist as being racist is.)

      A picture like the one from MS (but with younger people) would be spot-on in a meeting from any department in the company, including accounting, customer service, and tech.

      As for Mission Impossible... An American in Russia would be pretty freaking obvious no matter what color his skin was. The facial features are just too different and noticeable.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    19. Re:Dark Tan? by Hattmannen · · Score: 1

      Oh, you mean something similar to this?

      --
      People are not wearing enough hats.
    20. Re:Dark Tan? by Errtu76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's not necessarily true. In Central Europe, nationalism is alive and well (actually increasing due to the perceived cultural threat from the EU), and a picture with three different skin colors for three people will not be interpreted as affirmative action, but unwanted external cultural influence.

      Particularly the black guy, as you don't expect to see black people every day.

      In Hungary, at least, the original picture would cause outrage from the far-right and a measurable decrease in sales.

      In Holland we could not care less. Outrage over a picture like this? People in Hungary should get out more often. And i don't think that sales would suddenly drop because of this. The people who are dumb enough to get offended by this usually aren't the ones that make decisions that cause companies to buy the product or not.

    21. Re:Dark Tan? by plastbox · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure I understand.. by

      American style kitchen

      ..do you mean MacDonald's? Because I'm pretty sure most Europeans don't exactly consider MacDonald's foreign.

    22. Re:Dark Tan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful
      A picture like the one from MS (but with younger people) would be spot-on in a meeting from any department in the company, including accounting, customer service, and tech.

      So there aren't any white males in your company?

    23. Re:Dark Tan? by Clovis42 · · Score: 1

      The original showed an Asian guy, a black guy and a white woman. How tediously politically correct. Also completely unrealistic for Poland. (Is it even realistic for the US?)

      No, not really. If you ask the average person in the US what percentage of Americans are black you'll get crazy responses like 20% - 40%. I guess this comes from stuff like advertising and TV. Anyway, blacks make up about 13.4% of the US population.

      OTOH, it is quite possible to actually see this kind of diversity. Most large businesses do not discriminate based on race.

      --
      Clovis
      ^ Clovis, look! It's that guy you are!
    24. Re:Dark Tan? by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      +1 Funny if I had points. :-)

    25. Re:Dark Tan? by broeman · · Score: 1

      Well, the Netherlands also have had (still have?) a large immigration from outside Europe. Most "western" European countries are exposed to different cultures, but the "eastern" countries have not been a part of this.

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    26. Re:Dark Tan? by Arrawa · · Score: 1

      Of course Europeans see McDonalds as foreign. But the brand is emphasising the American way of life, which is considered positive in many countries.

    27. Re:Dark Tan? by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Outrage over a picture like this? People in Hungary should get out more often.

      Well, that's kind of the point. You walk outside in Poland, and you don't see any black people.

      What would be the reaction if this were marketed in Europe, and all three people were Asian? "Is this a Japanese board room?" Or if all three people were very dark-skinned black: "Where's this taking place? Kenya?" It's sort of the same thing.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    28. Re:Dark Tan? by Arrawa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually we would care. There's no office in the Netherlands where the employees are this clean-cut and well dressed :-)

    29. Re:Dark Tan? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      The original showed an Asian guy, a black guy and a white woman. How tediously politically correct. Also completely unrealistic for Poland. (Is it even realistic for the US?)

      I'm reminded of the original Mission Impossible series in the 60s. One agent, Barney, was black. He often was sent "undercover" to various (fictional) "Eastern Bloc" countries, and no one noticed, despite him being the only black guy in the whole city (well, we never saw any others).

      Which is why it was called Mission Impossible.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    30. Re:Dark Tan? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Cue Kanye West.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    31. Re:Dark Tan? by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      They're the ones in the Caymans, collecting the "investment funding". Where have you been the last 10 years?

    32. Re:Dark Tan? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      In Holland we could not care less. Outrage over a picture like this? People in Hungary should get out more often. And i don't think that sales would suddenly drop because of this. The people who are dumb enough to get offended by this usually aren't the ones that make decisions that cause companies to buy the product or not.

      You've got to keep in mind that Netherland is a bit more cosmopolitan than, well, most countries in the world, in fact. Central Europe is very, very different in that regard. They've never been the kind of merchant empires that many Western European countries have been in the past 5 centuries, and more recently they also haven't had the kind of immigration we've had.

      It's not so much that people there are necessarily racist, it's just that they're not nearly as used to actually meeting people with different skin colours, so I can imagine the original photo wouldn't quite work the way it was originally intended.

      Even so, it's a horrible hack job. If they didn't like the original photo, they should have made a new one, rather than go for a really painfully ugly and obvious photoshop that only opens them up for accusations of racism. The guy who did this badly needs to be fired.

    33. Re:Dark Tan? by jo42 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not racist! I hate you all equally."

    34. Re:Dark Tan? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I wondered how long it would be until we got someone throwing the "PC" claim.

      Let's get this straight: if a photo happens to have an actual non-white person in it, that must be out of some "political correctness". But if someone decides to change someone's colour with Photoshop, giving a false and unrealistic representation of the scene, that's okay?

      If they are really so concerned with being "completely realistic for Poland", perhaps they could, I dunno, get some actual Poles, rather than getting Americans who pretend to be Polish (if you need to fake it with Photoshop, I would hardly call that a "realistic" presentation of the scene).

    35. Re:Dark Tan? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Then why did they keep the Asian guy, and the black hands?

      Because they were stupid hacks. You don't seriously believe that a lot of thought went into that Polish version, do you?

    36. Re:Dark Tan? by WebmasterNeal · · Score: 1

      Its unlikely that Microsoft even shot the photo to begin with. The majority of Marketing departments just go to iStockphoto and buy something off of there.

      --
      "During My Service In The United States Congress, I Took The Initiative In Creating The Internet." -Al Gore
    37. Re:Dark Tan? by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      it's not so much from advertising, it's from all those episodes of COPS

    38. Re:Dark Tan? by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OTOH, it is quite possible to actually see this kind of diversity.

      Yes, indeed. If they make up 13.4%, then in a photo of 3, the probability of at least one black person being present is about 35%. Not more often than not - but nonetheless large enough that you'll see a fair number of black people in photos in advertising. Just because something is uncommon doesn't mean you'll never see it at all. With the large number of adverts, you'd expect to see plenty of non-white people.

      And surely, the idea that any given picture must itself be proportionally representative of the population is itself poltically correct? If instead the participants are chosen independent of race, then you'll get some photos without any black people, and some photos where they are overrepresented. Let's be honest now - if someone was saying "black people are 13.4% of the population, so in our cast of 50 people, we need to have 6 or 7 black people", I bet we'd have people saying how politically correct that was...

      Do you have evidence that non-white people are overrepresented in American media? If anything, I'd suspect the reverse.

      The problem is that people ignore the large amounts of times a black person isn't shown, and on the few occasions where one is, it's "OMG, how PC!" Just because a group are in a minority, doesn't mean they are never seen at all.

      I also bet that if someone Photoshopped a white person to be black, there'd be no end of screaming "It's PC gone mad" from people, rather than saying "But they're just trying to better represent and connect with their market".

    39. Re:Dark Tan? by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      What would be the reaction if this were marketed in Europe, and all three people were Asian? "Is this a Japanese board room?" Or if all three people were very dark-skinned black: "Where's this taking place? Kenya?" It's sort of the same thing.

      So really your point is that there are no black, asian, or white women in Europe? Does one black person really confuse people that much?

    40. Re:Dark Tan? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Or the remake of the Wild West?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    41. Re:Dark Tan? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok. So you need to "localize" the images. That makes a certain amount of sense. Except they didn't completely "localize" the image. They just got rid of the black guy while leaving the asian one behind. Also since we're going to the trouble of "localizing" then getting rid of the WASPy white faces would probably be a good idea too.

      The "localized" version doesn't look terribly European either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:Dark Tan? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Nevermind the facial features. It's the vacant expression that's going to give the Americans away. This is why the "localized" version of the Microsoft picture is such a joke. Poles are not that stupid (despite all of the jokes).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    43. Re:Dark Tan? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Holland has been independent and laid back since before countries like Poland (or the US) were independent nations. It's rather unfair to try and compare any place else to Holland really.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:Dark Tan? by skorch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The original showed an Asian guy, a black guy and a white woman. How tediously politically correct. Also completely unrealistic for Poland. (Is it even realistic for the US?)

      Is it even realistic for the US? Are you serious? I'm a black guy born on the African continent sitting in an office with a white woman and a jewish guy. In the office right next to mine there's an asian woman and a guy from the UK. Just walking down the hall yields people from every ethnicity. Sure there are obvious majorities and minorities, but it's almost impossible to snap a candid photo of this office and not have a pretty colorful palette of skin-tones. I'm not exactly a fan of political correctness, but I think this recent anti-PC movement smacks of a type of reactionary bigotry I'm even less comfortable with (probably because it always seems to be coming from the same 'demographic' of people).

      The issue isn't that they felt having white guys in their ad would be more appropriate for their intended audience, the issue is that they whitewashed a black guy out of an existing image (poorly), suggesting that the black guy would be unacceptable (but the asian and woman were fine?). If they found the orriginal image inappropriate, then find, buy, or cast and shoot another photo that more suits your demographic. Slapping a black guy in white face is just stupid (look at the results), and I can't see how it's not insulting, if to no one else but your intended audience; suggesting they can't handle the sight of a black guy.

    45. Re:Dark Tan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Let's get this straight: if a photo happens to have an actual non-white person in it, that must be out of some "political correctness".

      Yes.

      But if someone decides to change someone's colour with Photoshop, giving a false and unrealistic representation of the scene, that's okay?

      No, that was even more stupid. (Though the "scene" is entirely staged and unrealistic whatever version you choose.)

      If they are really so concerned with being "completely realistic for Poland", perhaps they could, I dunno, get some actual Poles

      Yes.

    46. Re:Dark Tan? by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is that the Black guy will probably end up getting paid less then the original white guy since the image was probably taken from a stock photo library rather then a studio shot like the original actor.

    47. Re:Dark Tan? by rpresser · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the results? They did not "slap a black guy in white face". They replaced the entire black guy (except for his hand) with a totally different white guy.

    48. Re:Dark Tan? by KnownIssues · · Score: 1

      What would be the reaction if this were marketed in Europe, and all three people were Asian? "Is this a Japanese board room?" Or if all three people were very dark-skinned black: "Where's this taking place? Kenya?" It's sort of the same thing.

      Except that all three people are not the same race/color in the original. It's a no-win situation for businesses though. If I include races and proportions that are representative of the location I'm targeting, and that location isn't racially diverse, then I offend the races not represented and I lose. If I include a broad mix of races, but that isn't representative of the location I'm targeting, then I put off the people in that location and I lose.

      Which is why I propose that media replace all representations of humans with the blue beings from the Avatar movie

    49. Re:Dark Tan? by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      If the same had been done here in Argentina it would have been completely understandable. Only in recent years we've started seeing more black people in Buenos Aires, and they're still very rare (they're very common in Uruguay, just across the pond... but it's said that argentine black people were killed in the war against Paraguay). Putting a black person in an ad is as representative of argentine people as putting an albino.

      On the other hand we have a very large asian community. Mostly Korean and Chinese, AFAIK.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    50. Re:Dark Tan? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "This was just a poor attempt at getting something out the door to fit the job, rather than doing another shoot with fresh models."

      probably happens hundreds of times a day and we don't even notice.

      Honestly I don't see the big deal here. Poland thought it'd be better to have a white guy in there than a black guy. If Poland had some photos we were going to use, you know damn well we'd be photoshopping in a black guy. There's no news here, it's just marketing to your demographics. Only reason us Americans give a crap is because white America has a guilty conscience about black people. We don't care about the Native Americans we slaughtered for hundreds of years or the Asians we put in internment camps in WWII. Nope. But photoshop out a black guy and it's on /. and fark.

      Our white American guilty conscience has gone so far as to skew google search results, which returns only slavery in America since 1600 when you google "history of slavery", instead of the entire history since the Babylons and Romans.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    51. Re:Dark Tan? by Mprx · · Score: 1

      They only replaced the head.

    52. Re:Dark Tan? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      The original showed an Asian guy, a black guy and a white woman. How tediously politically correct. Also completely unrealistic for Poland. (Is it even realistic for the US?)

      Depends what part of the country you live in and whether the office is in a larger city or smaller city. For example, I live in San Diego, which is in Southern California. The African American population here is pretty small, but the Asian and Mexican population is quite substantial, larger than the white population when combined. Seeing a picture of one Asian, an African American, and a white person seems normal, although more realistically it would be one white person, one Asian, and one Latino.

      However, if you are working in, say, Atlanta (a big city in the southeast part of the US) there is a much larger African American population. And you'll see a larger percentage of European immigrants in the northeast (New York, Boston, etc.).

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    53. Re:Dark Tan? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Is it even realistic for the US? Are you serious?

      I'm not an American, don't know what it's really like there. It seemed a bit unlikely to me that a typical office would be so colour coordinated (except of course for white) but I didn't know. So I asked. Sorry if that offended you.

      The issue isn't that they felt having white guys in their ad would be more appropriate for their intended audience, the issue is that they whitewashed a black guy out of an existing image (poorly)

      Well, that issue is pennypinching. Ads are completely manufactured images, fake before during and after the actual photos are taken. In this case the faking was rather too obvious. For instance, it looks rather like the (formerly) black guy has an Apple laptop, though the logo seems to have disappeared....

      I can't see how it's not insulting

      98% of ads are insulting. Even more so the ones I see online. It's only because it's Microsoft that it's even slightly newsworthy -- that a large American company would do something bound to piss off people like yourself if it came to light.

      Some of the more obnoxious cheapskate ad campaigns like the "Adult Friendfinder" that presents me photos of skanky blonde bimbos with their legs gaping, while telling me that they live in my neighbourhood (determined by my IP). A neighbourhood where 99.5% of the people are Chinese. Those ads insulted me in so many different ways that it motivated me to set up an effective ad blocker on my PCs. That's all you can do with stupid ads, block them.

    54. Re:Dark Tan? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're from Amsterdam?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    55. Re:Dark Tan? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You haven't looked around America much, have you?

          But for entertainment, go park in front of McDonalds or Walmart for an hour, and keep track of the demographics of folks walking in and out. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    56. Re:Dark Tan? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          I love the localized dating ads. I just saw one yesterday. An attractive woman, and the text said something like "I'm a lonely model traveling the country doing photo shoots. I just landed in [this city], and will be here for 3 days." The funny part is, they named the small town I'm in. There's no airport. She was distinctly out of place. Not to say there aren't attractive women here (there are plenty), but she had the LA look, not the look for here.

          I knew someone who did those ads years ago. They were the first ads like that, that I saw. He used GeoIP to determine the city, and would automatically populate the variable. The silly part of these ads are when I travel, sometimes it doesn't know where I am, so it'll leave a blank, or still show the variable.

          "I'm just into $city and want to meet you" :)

          I'll give her a call as soon as I get to $city. ha.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    57. Re:Dark Tan? by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      The people who are dumb enough to get offended by this usually aren't the ones that make decisions that cause companies to buy the product or not.

      Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

    58. Re:Dark Tan? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      "I'm not racist! I hate you all equally."

      Gunny Hartman? Is that you?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    59. Re:Dark Tan? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Also since we're going to the trouble of "localizing" then getting rid of the WASPy white faces would probably be a good idea too.

      The white girl in the picture is actually pretty close to your average Slav today - white, dark but not black hair, green or blue or brown eyes.

    60. Re:Dark Tan? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      As for Mission Impossible... An American in Russia would be pretty freaking obvious no matter what color his skin was. The facial features are just too different and noticeable.

      The only "facial feature" that marks your average American as distinct from your average Russian is that glued-on ear-to-ear grin. Though, granted, that one is a dead giveaway - if you smile to the girl at the counter in a Russian supermarket, we'll know straight away that you're a foreigner. ~

    61. Re:Dark Tan? by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

      There are actually a lot of Russian immigrants here in the US and Eastern Bloc ppl as well.

      I think you could find some ppl here that look a lot like ppl there.

      Mostly because their grandparents came from there.

      --
      google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    62. Re:Dark Tan? by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      The original guy is the black guy. The retouch job put a white man's head on him just for the Polish ad.

    63. Re:Dark Tan? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      Is it even realistic for the US? Are you serious? I'm a black guy born on the African continent sitting in an office with a white woman and a jewish guy. In the office right next to mine there's an asian woman and a guy from the UK.

      Dey tuk er jeobs!!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    64. Re:Dark Tan? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Whooosh

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    65. Re:Dark Tan? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Its only insulting if you happen to be self loathing for some reason. Most of us aren't actually subjected to outright racism anymore and frankly don't give a fuck about something this trivial.

      If you get all uppity over it than you need to consider how great your life is when the biggest 'bad thing' that happens in your day is some photo was changed to a guy with different skin color. If thats your 'bad day', then shut your pie hole and get a grip on reality. Give live where it is actually shitty to be black or where blacks are actually suffering.

      Contrary to your belief, the world doesn't revolve around you and your pathetic insecurities.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    66. Re:Dark Tan? by roseblood · · Score: 1

      That's not necessarily true. In Central Europe, nationalism is alive and well (actually increasing due to the perceived cultural threat from the EU), and a picture with three different skin colors for three people will not be interpreted as affirmative action, but unwanted external cultural influence.

      Particularly the black guy, as you don't expect to see black people every day.

      In Hungary, at least, the original picture would cause outrage from the far-right and a measurable decrease in sales.

      So, you're saying the Polish are racists and MS is just bowing to market forces?

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    67. Re:Dark Tan? by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The picture for a Pole just screams "foreign", since the picture is nonrepresentative for a Polish office setting

      I've seen a million of these ads, particularly in IT magazines, and I can tell you this thought crosses my mind almost every time. Not in a parochial way, just in a "this ad is completely fake" way.

      I live in Ireland. This place is reasonably cosmopolitan, especially in Dublin, but this ad does not say "Typical Irish Office" to me. For a start, there's a skyline. Yeah, we don't have too many of those. Secondly, there are three sharply dressed people smiling with immaculate teeth in a pristine meeting room. You don't get too much of any of that here.

      Yes, there's a black guy, and Asian guy and an attractive woman. This only further removes the ad from the typical office experience over here, which consists of grumbling, stubble ridden, bleary eyed, overweight Irish IT staff, one generation removed from salt of the earth boggers. If you've ever seen Chris O'Dowd in "the IT crowd", you know what I'm talking about here.

      Basically, this ad screams "Fake". It says, "I am a Big Fake American Ad. Buy My Product." None of these people have ever worked in IT. It's tacky and cheap and in no way whatsoever specific to what is being sold. The whole package is not inspiring me to shop till I drop.

      I'm guessing the Microsoft marketing crowd in Poland must have sensed the ad would get the same reception over there. They decided to try and move it from being a "Big Fake American Ad" to just being a standard "Big Fake Ad". Moreover, they did it in a godsawfully ham-fisted way, literally stapling some white guys face over the oldest and the most "American" of the faces, namely the misfortunate black actor in the shot. They even missed out the hand, which reveals a level of photoshop incompetence you wouldn't see in a 4chan meme creator.

      Their actions have failed to create even a "Big Fake Ad". Instead, they've made a "Big Fake International Media Incident". Stirring stuff. This is what happens when you rely on stock photographs and inept 'shoppers because you were too cheap to hire a local photographer to snap a shot or two in a local IT office.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    68. Re:Dark Tan? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Poland has a rising Asian population (Koreans I think) which are basically replacing the jobs that Poles used to do before running off to the UK. So actually the asian would make more sense as a foreigner than the black man even if blacks do exist in Poland as well.

    69. Re:Dark Tan? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      if you smile to the girl at the counter in a Russian supermarket, we'll know straight away that you're a foreigner. ~

      Because Russians know that she would smile back the Russian way?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    70. Re:Dark Tan? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Nah, she'd ask you if you find something wrong about her and want to offend her by laughing at it, or if you're just not quite sane.

    71. Re:Dark Tan? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You've got to keep in mind that Netherland is a bit more cosmopolitan than, well, most countries in the world, in fact. Central Europe is very, very different in that regard. They've never been the kind of merchant empires that many Western European countries have been in the past 5 centuries, and more recently they also haven't had the kind of immigration we've had.

      Actually, the very first historical mention of Prague, e.g., by Ibrahim ibn Yaqub in the latter half of the 10th century describes the city as a busy and bustling trade center, joining the East with the West through which many a trade caravan passed. You will have a hard time convincing me that there is no part of Central Europe used to seeing a lot of foreigners. As for immigration, this is a process that can take many forms. There are some of us who get very well over the loss of opportunity to support our construction industry by means of building certain religious buildings.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    72. Re:Dark Tan? by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      Thank you for pointing out the variety in American offices. Especially in tech (where recruiting for jobs definitely happens on a global scale, at least for large companies), evenly lily-white offices are not normal. Consistency of gender, race, or any other detail (except hopefully high intelligence) cannot be expected in this melting pot, even if you only recruit locally.

    73. Re:Dark Tan? by j_166 · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? MacDonald's is Irish. Last time I checked, Irishland was in Europe. Idiot.

    74. Re:Dark Tan? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the explanation. I will remember to smile at Russian girls at the counter to properly signalize that I'm indeed not quite sane (I actually happen to suffer from some minor brain damage). :)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    75. Re:Dark Tan? by j_166 · · Score: 1

      That was brilliant. I LOL'd.

    76. Re:Dark Tan? by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Right on. In Philadelphia its around 50% white to like 45% black. In y town 3 hours outside Phila. by car, its 99% white. Why would people give a damn about the distribution over the entire country? You might as well be asking what the distribution is over the northern hemisphere, or the entire world. Basically useless trivia.

    77. Re:Dark Tan? by j_166 · · Score: 1

      Did anybody even stop to consider that the guy in the picture might be a white guy who just happens to be afflicted with reverse-vitilligo in his hands?

    78. Re:Dark Tan? by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

      The woman could easily pass for a Slav, the shape of her face, the color of her skin and hair, none of it is uncommon in the region. And Asians are fairly common in the region. There are lots of people from Central and East Asia spread all over the Slavic countries (not to the extent there are here, but common enough in the cities that you'd run into a few each day as you go about your business). There are also quite a few of them in the Russian media (which is widely available throughout the region).

      On the other hand, black people who are neither tourists nor there on short business trips are very uncommon (though that's apparently changing). A Russian friend of mine, who was no shut-in by any stretch of the imagination, was in her late twenties when she first met a black man who spoke fluent, unaccented, Russian. She lived, studied, and worked in Moscow for twenty-some years and never in that time met a single black who did so, nor had she see more than a token few in the media (excepting foreign media), nor (to her knowledge) had any of her friends. Such people do, of course, exist. She knew they existed. But she was still surprised enough the first time she met one that she had to pause for a second just to take the experience in. She's not a racist; it's just the surprise of breaking a long-held and often-reinforced expectation - sort of the same as being pleasantly surprised by good service in your hometown after years of utterly shitty service. That, in my admittedly limited experience, is typical of most Slavic countries.

      The black man in the picture isn't going to piss off the nationalists or the racists in any significant way (most of them probably aren't going to buy Microsoft anyway) - I don't think that was their motivation. He is, however, incongruous, and that's something you want to minimize in an advertisement, as it might make people think rather than just leaving a subconscious impression. Granted, they probably failed horribly at that (what with the mismatched lighting and the skyscrapers in the background), but I imagine the conversation went: "If you have time for nothing else, take out the black man, his skin and his spot in the image draw attention, the rest is in the background so most people won't even see it."

    79. Re:Dark Tan? by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      hurr durr!!

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    80. Re:Dark Tan? by andreyvul · · Score: 1

      hurr durr

      --
      proud caffeine whore
    81. Re:Dark Tan? by Atario · · Score: 1

      So what? Are people seeing a Microsoft ad in Poland supposed to believe that Microsoft is not an American (or, dare I say, hugenormous transnational) company? Are they supposed to be duped into thinking this "Microsoft" company they're suddenly hearing about is some local Polish outfit? Seems like that would not be giving Poles much credit.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    82. Re:Dark Tan? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      So what is the body language in Russia to tell a girl you want to fuck her?

      In America we smile and raise our eyebrows.

      In France they smile and stroke their beards or chin.

      What is Rusky body language for 'want to fuck'?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    83. Re:Dark Tan? by skorch · · Score: 1

      You're right, they didn't air-brush his skintone to make him look white, they did the photoshop equivalent of putting a paper bag over his head with a photo of a white guy on it.

      Yeah, that's much better.

    84. Re:Dark Tan? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Does one black person really confuse people that much?

      It's not so much confusion but identification that they're worried about. You're supposed to *identify* with the people in the ad, either consciously or unconsciously, and that makes you think you should buy it.

      It's like when I see an ad for a mini-van, and there's a soccer mom hauling her kids around, I think "I don't need that, that's for suburban moms" -- even at a subconscious level.

      Read through the comments on this story. Look at the posts from the New Zealander who thinks ads with black people are target towards the US. Or how in France they don't have blond haired, blue-eyed people because they would be though of as Dutch. Or how those same blond-haired, blue-eyed people aren't in ads in Italy. Or how the token minority in German ads is a Turkish or otherwise middle-eastern person.

      The mix people people is more about how a nation, and the individual of that nation, identifies their society, than about "Blacks in Poland? Huh?". In the US, we have white people, some blacks, and some Asians. That's how we perceive ourselves, so that's how ads are made ( it is a feedback loop -- we do percieve ourselves in the way we are presented in ads, also ). Same goes for other countries -- they just percieve themselves in different ways.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    85. Re:Dark Tan? by skorch · · Score: 1

      Its only insulting if you happen to be self loathing for some reason.

      This comment would make sense only if I didn't have the same reaction several years ago when some college did the same thing in reverse with one of its brochures: they felt they needed more diversity so they photoshopped an extra black guy's head over a white guy's. The issue isn't that the guy they replaced in this instance was black per-se, the issue is that they ungracefully replaced a person with another person for racially motivated reasons.

      Most of us aren't actually subjected to outright racism anymore and frankly don't give a fuck about something this trivial.

      For something "this trivial" you seem to have taken about as much time out of your day to comment as I have. And yes, majority populations don't typically get subjected to outright racism, so this doesn't surprise me. Your point?

      If you get all uppity over it than you need to consider how great your life is when the biggest 'bad thing' that happens in your day is some photo was changed to a guy with different skin color. If thats your 'bad day', then shut your pie hole and get a grip on reality.

      Emphasis mine, but you appear to be having a pretty deep seated emotional reaction here. So who's having the bad day here? If you get all uppity over it then you need to consider how great your life is when the biggest 'bad thing' that happens in your day is some guy on the internet comments on some photo being changed. If that's your 'bad day', then shut your pie hole and get a grip on reality.

      Give live where it is actually shitty to be black or where blacks are actually suffering.

      Already did. Did I not mention the "born on the African Continent" bit in my first comment? Again, your point? Or were you just telling me to "go back to Africa you uppity negro"?

      Contrary to your belief, the world doesn't revolve around you and your pathetic insecurities.

      And contrary to your belief, my world doesn't revolve around your pathetic insecurities. But, this being an open forum, when a pet peeve comes up I feel free to comment on it honestly, and find great entertainment in seeing the closet ethnocentrists come crawling out of the woodwork and start screaming.

      The funniest thing about this is that no one is even denying that this was a purely racially motivated shop-job, and yet people are still getting upset at the folks who are pointing out that it is.

    86. Re:Dark Tan? by PW2 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the local newspaper, Atlanta-Journal-Constitution, did some photoshopping of their own -- a few Sundays ago, I noticed that the Foxtrot cartoon showed Jason with a caucasian friend which seemed out of place based on their character-set; I checked online and verified the difference.

    87. Re:Dark Tan? by skorch · · Score: 1

      I'm not an American, don't know what it's really like there. It seemed a bit unlikely to me that a typical office would be so colour coordinated (except of course for white) but I didn't know. So I asked. Sorry if that offended you.

      Fair enough, and no real offense. I apologize too, I came off a bit harsher in my response than intended.

      Well, that issue is pennypinching. Ads are completely manufactured images, fake before during and after the actual photos are taken. In this case the faking was rather too obvious. For instance, it looks rather like the (formerly) black guy has an Apple laptop, though the logo seems to have disappeared....

      Well, I would agree with this point on some levels, but I think there are different degrees to which ads may go to present their desired message (sure they're all lies, but some lies are bigger than others). Not wanting to get too deeply mired in details of selecting for and selecting against a target audience, let me just say that to me there is a difference between a magazine cover airbrushing a model to artificially "idealize" her physique (though I also find this annoying and wish they wouldn't) and artificially replacing an already present individual with someone else entirely to "idealize" their portrayed work environment. If one needs to go that far then again I'd say it would just be more prudent (if only from a PR standpoint, seeing the results this situation has generated) to find a completely different image to use. One instance is altering a person to make them "better", and another is rejecting a person saying another type of person is "better". Not really as big since, as you point out, the whole ad is fake to begin with, but there are instances where places have done this with candid photos that actually did portray a reality they weren't satisfied with.

      98% of ads are insulting. Even more so the ones I see online. It's only because it's Microsoft that it's even slightly newsworthy -- that a large American company would do something bound to piss off people like yourself if it came to light.

      Well, truth be told this is just a general pet peeve of mine, and contrary to how it may have sounded, I react the same when they're replacing a white guy with black faces, or shopping in extra women into a board-room to pretend they don't have a glass ceiling. My initial response to you though was to point out that this type of diversity isn't unheard of in the US, but when companies have to go out of their way to so obviously fake it (or in this case, double-fake it), it starts crossing some lines. The real insult here (even more so than the racial one really) is that they thought this really shoddy job was acceptable.

      Some of the more obnoxious cheapskate ad campaigns like the "Adult Friendfinder" that presents me photos of skanky blonde bimbos with their legs gaping, while telling me that they live in my neighbourhood (determined by my IP). A neighbourhood where 99.5% of the people are Chinese. Those ads insulted me in so many different ways that it motivated me to set up an effective ad blocker on my PCs. That's all you can do with stupid ads, block them.

      Well, here I just have to agree 100%. I find some forms of targeted ads to be less "offensive" than others (at least they're trying to show me things I might be interested in), but this form of targeted ad is just, as you say, stupid.

    88. Re:Dark Tan? by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      It is very realistic for parts of the U.S., such as Calfornia, where there is no single ethic or racial group that predominates; a random shot of any group of people is much more likely than not to contain some diversity. On the other hand, there still are parts of the U.S. that are very much less diverse (e.g., the inner core and exurbs of any Rust Belt city which will be nearly all-Black and all-White respectively, or Southwest border towns which are very largely first- and second-generation Mexican). Even in the U.S. it is very hard to generalize about diversity or the lack thereof.

    89. Re:Dark Tan? by akayani · · Score: 1

      "The accountant cut a head off another brochure, stuck it in place with spit and scanned it. What choice did he have the creative department wouldn't touch it."

    90. Re:Dark Tan? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the reaction in Holland would have been if the woman was wearing an Islamic headscarf.

  2. Even Stranger...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    is the white macbook in the picture......

    1. Re:Even Stranger...... by yoyhed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or the fact that the monitor isn't plugged into anything.

      By the way, I'd already read this on a couple other news sites, and the bluntness of Slashdot's headline cracked me up. The other sites said something like "Microsoft hires racist marketing team". Then Slashdot steps in with "MS PHOTOSHOPS WHITE DUDE OVER SOME BLACK GUY".

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    2. Re:Even Stranger...... by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... with the apple logo photoshopped out

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    3. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What surprises me is that the black guy had to go, while the asian is alright.

      They couldn't just take a new fucking picture with Polish people on it, now could they?

    4. Re:Even Stranger...... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They wouldn't be able to use the Apple logo anyway. You can't put someone else's trademark in your own promotional materials!

    5. Re:Even Stranger...... by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Seems like the old stereotypes at work. Hire Asians, they're smart! Don't hire those negores, though; they're lazy and they steal!

      Having been born in a part of Europe that isn't much different from Poland, I can safely say that these stereotypes were quite common in much of Europe, at least while I was a child. When we moved to Canada, seeing asians didn't strike me as all that odd, but I really didn't know what to make of blacks. I got in trouble more than once at school for making racist comments about (or to) black classmates, but thanks to having spent my formative years in a nation which placidly accepts racial bigotry, it wasn't until years later that I really understood that there was anything wrong about the things I had said. I think it's hard for people who were born into multicultural societies to really understand what it's like being raised in that kind of culture.

    6. Re:Even Stranger...... by srussia · · Score: 1

      is the white macbook in the picture......

      They should've photoshopped it black for a more "enterprisey" look".

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    7. Re:Even Stranger...... by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      Then Slashdot steps in with "MS PHOTOSHOPS WHITE DUDE OVER SOME BLACK GUY".

      Just the head. His hand is still black. Maybe they just hired Michael Jackson...? Too soon?

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    8. Re:Even Stranger...... by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      You're on to something there - perhaps the white guy was photoshopped with a black guy for the American market ; P

      No, wait. That would only work if having a "black right hand" (cue Nick Cave) had some sort of symbolic signifigance the Polish. Damn my cultural ignorance...

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    9. Re:Even Stranger...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      the ports on the side certainly look like an exact match to me.

      Maybe.

      But any Mac user know it's the ports in the rear that get the most use.

    10. Re:Even Stranger...... by mpe · · Score: 1

      Just the head. His hand is still black. Maybe they just hired Michael Jackson...?

      Or possibly even the wrong Michael Jackson. They actually wanted Michael A Jackson...

    11. Re:Even Stranger...... by JM78 · · Score: 1

      Insightful!? Seriously?

      There's nothing surprising about this at all. It costs far more to hire new models, photographer(s), etc. and find/rent suitable space than it does to pay a single designer a few hours of Photoshop time. Obviously budget mattered over appearance in this case; otherwise they would have bothered.

      Additionally, a marketing decision such as this is made to better relate to a target audience. What's surprising about that? People relate to things they know. I'm not an expert on Poland but I'll give the benefit of the doubt that the new image visually speaks better to the core audience.

      I know the parent didn't call this out specifically however, for those out there calling this kind of decision raciest, it's more raciest to make such a statement than the act itself IMHO. People buy what they are comfortable with and that includes culture. Skin color is a part of culture. This was a marketing decision. Get over it.

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    12. Re:Even Stranger...... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      It costs far more to hire new models, photographer(s), etc. and find/rent suitable space than it does to pay a single designer a few hours of Photoshop time.

      Photoshop?

      Judging by the quality of this, they used MS Paint.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    13. Re:Even Stranger...... by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      Or the fact that they didn't bother to change the guy's hand or at least lighten the tone a bit.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    14. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jurily · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it wasn't until years later that I really understood that there was anything wrong about the things I had said.

      Translation: they finally brainwashed you. People are not equal, never were, and never will be, no matter how hard you try to believe it. But now we need a $8 million study to acknowledge the fact that men and women think differently.

      Of course kids will joke at each others' expense: you're fat, she's blonde, he's black. That's all perfectly normal. The fact that people think merely making a nigger joke is racist means things are seriously fucked up. Quoting Troy: "It's not an insult to say a dead man - is dead."

      Racism is when you hate those who are different for no logical reason, not merely talk about it casually and be fine with it. Also, most people here accept evolution for a fact, yet deny that it applies to humans as well. Ever heard the term "doublethink"?

    15. Re:Even Stranger...... by mustafap · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know what's funnier - your comment or the fact that it was modded 'Informative'

      --
      Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
    16. Re:Even Stranger...... by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Seems like the old stereotypes at work. Hire Asians, they're smart! Don't hire those negores, though; they're lazy and they steal!

      Uh, no, it's "the latinos steal". Get your stereotypes right!

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    17. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Racism is when you hate those who are different for no logical reason, not merely talk about it casually and be fine with it.

      Uh, no. Racism is not limited to "hate"- you can love people of one race over all others for no reason other than they are members of that race, that's still racism.

      However, what is total bullshit about your analysis is that you think "talking casually about it and being fine with it" is not racism. Duh! You judge an entire group based on the attributes of a few individuals, but because you joke about it you aren't racist?

      Dude, you've brainwashed yourself with your own rationalizations. You've embraced your own version of doublethink.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    18. Re:Even Stranger...... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yes you can. You just can't pass off your product as theirs.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    19. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jurily · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, what is total bullshit about your analysis is that you think "talking casually about it and being fine with it" is not racism. Duh! You judge an entire group based on the attributes of a few individuals, but because you joke about it you aren't racist?

      Who said I judge anyone? I just don't shy away from the topic of skin color any more than from the topic of hair color. Consider the following joke: "How long is a gypsy girl a virgin? As long as she's stronger than her younger brother, runs faster than her older brother, and her dad's still in jail." If you can't tell it to your best friend, who happens to be a gypsy, and expect a good laugh from it over a beer at the pub, it's you who thinks way too much about ethnicity.

      And here is what I consider a normal approach on the topic.

    20. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you can't tell it to your best friend, who happens to be a gypsy, and expect a good laugh from it over a beer at the pub, it's you who thinks way too much about ethnicity.

      And if you personally can't replace "gypsy" with any ethnic group and find the joke just as funny then you are stereotyping. And puh-lease, "my best friend is a ..." is the first sentence in the book of how to be a racist.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:Even Stranger...... by Sam+Lowry · · Score: 1

      Dude, you've never been to Poland, ya?

      There are a few asians but no blacks at all.

      Putting a black guy in a Microsoft ad amounts to the same as putting an assyrian or an eskimos there.

    22. Re:Even Stranger...... by darkonc · · Score: 5, Interesting
      In grade 7 I went to a boarding school. One of my friends was a guy who was born in Texas in the late '50s. (( pertinent point: I'm half-black))

      He grew up in an all-white (segregated_ neighborhood where racist comments like "come on, act like a white man" were quite the norm.
      He didn't even think to question those kinds of comments until he ended up sharing a table with me for a couple of months. I'll tell you -- those racist comments were a hard habit to break. Even into the second month, he would still occasionally go "Oh come on, act like a whi.... blah, oh shit I did it again", and then spend the next couple of minutes apologizing to me.

      It would have been funny if it wasn't for the fact that he was so hurt by what was coming out of his mouth.

      My point though, is that -- until he met me, and the one other black student at the school, he hadn't even thought to reconsider the racist comments and jokes that he had grown up with -- or the racist attitudes that went with them.

      Now, I realize that anti-racism really has to go a long way past simply banning racist jokes, but that does, at least, cause people to consider that the other racist attitudes that may be floating around their space aren't the norm and/or don't represent the real (and generally rather minor) differences between the races.

      and, if you want to get a handle on just how close we all are, consider that geneticists were able to find more genetic diversity in a single band of chimps, than across the various human races.

      --
      Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
    23. Re:Even Stranger...... by polemistes · · Score: 1

      There are many more asian people in Poland than black people. I heard that many years ago Poland had a kind of common poitical platform with a large asian country.
      Still, this stupid mistake doesn't say that Microsoft is racist, or their marketing department, but it says that they think the people in Poland are. I don't think that's a better message to send.

    24. Re:Even Stranger...... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 5, Funny

      My best friend is an ellipsis, what are you saying? (Though don't tell the other punctuation, I don't want them to think I'm playing favorites.)

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    25. Re:Even Stranger...... by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, you've brainwashed yourself with your own rationalizations. You've embraced your own version of doublethink.

      No way! If you say things like "brainwashing" and "doublethink" that many times, naturally you're totally immune to such phenomena! How could I possibly be wrong?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    26. Re:Even Stranger...... by Nephrite · · Score: 1

      So, you don't like the black guy changed to a white. Why don't you complain about the site being in polish rather than english?
      That reminds me... some stupid american reporter who took several shots at some celebrations in Moscow and then complained that the crowd was almost 100% white and no blacks was present. (just before someone gets smart: yes I know that Moscow is in Russia not in Poland) Has it occured to you that there are just no blacks in Poland in significant quantities? And that asian guy is in the background on both pictures so that is probably racist too.

    27. Re:Even Stranger...... by EdIII · · Score: 3, Funny

      Uh, no, it's "the latinos steal". Get your stereotypes right!

      Hence the joke... A black guy and a hispanic woman have children... they grew up too lazy to steal....

    28. Re:Even Stranger...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, how "racist" of them.
      We all know that ALL white countries on Earth are no longer allowed to remain 100% white.

      I wonder why that is.

      I wonder why that doesn't apply to Africa, for example, or India, or China. Why are they allowed to keep their countries, but we have to accept THEM, in their millions, into OUR countries?

      Your children will hate you for the legacy you've left them.

    29. Re:Even Stranger...... by GCsoftware · · Score: 1

      Informative? How the HELL is that informative?

    30. Re:Even Stranger...... by agentgonzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What makes me laugh is how carefully choreographed the original photo was. One black person, one asian, one white. Two men, one woman. It's amazing to see publicity photos etc and notice how many of them have the we-must-have-one-of-everything mentality in them. If everyone wasn't so paranoid about offending anyone, then the publicity shoot would have probably had a brief of "get three people in a room to look like they're having a fun meeting, then take a photo". Because everyone's afraid of being called a racist, I'm sure the brief would have included the caveat "Make sure one is black, one is Asian and at least one of them is a woman". The only thing that's missing is an "I'm gay" sign on one of them.

    31. Re:Even Stranger...... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      That depends on what country you're in when you do it. Plenty of places have laws against "naming" a competitor for good or bad in your advertisements.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    32. Re:Even Stranger...... by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be even stranger if, in this day and age, all photos of corporate meeting were of middle-aged white guys?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    33. Re:Even Stranger...... by moeinvt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that you're expressing the typical politically correct BS while the OP is expressing a minority opinion should tell you who has been brainwashed.

      A joke wouldn't be a joke without an element of truth.
      For instance, try to make a joke about Chinese people being "lazy" and see if you can elicit a laugh, even from an evil racist.

      Making a racial, religious, or cultural based joke is not "judging" a group as a whole, merely making fun of a stereotype easily formed by inductive reasoning. No intelligent person would universalize such a statement to 100% of the subject group.

      Are you REALLY offended by such things? Or are you just exhibiting the Pavlovian-style "feigned offense" response that you were conditioned to make by TV and higher education?

    34. Re:Even Stranger...... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's funny what used to be considered perfectly acceptable tv. I don't know what's worse, the blatant racism of the 70's, or the violence of today's TV shows.

      Granted, most of the comments Archie made, are quite reminiscent of things my grandfather would have said, who was born in roughly the same time as Archie's character. While i'm sure it's quite consistent with many people's attitudes, I still find it odd that they would portray it on TV.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    35. Re:Even Stranger...... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Probably the same way the native americans were stupid for defending themselves with whatever primitive weapons they had when going up against the white man who had guns and black powder. Granted a bow and arrow has some distinct advantages over a gun that can take a minute to reload. However, when you're defending your territory, you use whatever means you have, and you don't necessarily have time to wait for someone else to show up and save you.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    36. Re:Even Stranger...... by BForrester · · Score: 1

      Oh dont worry my friend I hate all punctuation equally after all my meaning is quite clear enough without those lazy good for nothing marks and signs

    37. Re:Even Stranger...... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Racism is when you hate those who are different for no logical reason,

      No, bigotry is when you hate those who are different for no reason other than that they're different.

      Racism is the belief that different races are, well, different - blacks are lazy, asians are smart, jews are money-grubbing, etc.

      And it is quite possible to be racist without being bigoted. Or it was at one time, when it wasn't so clear that the racial stereotypes are just stereotypes.

      H.P. Lovecraft was quite the racist. But his wife was Jewish (I'd really give a lot to know what those two talked about over dinner - "Honey, that Hebe Shylock over on 12th robbed me blind on that loan yesterday", "Dearest, that's Daddy you're talking about"). Far as I can tell, while he believed pretty much all the raciat stereotypes common to his period, he didn't actually let them color his relations with the people he knew, no matter their race....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    38. Re:Even Stranger...... by yt8znu35 · · Score: 1

      Also, most people here accept evolution for a fact, yet deny that it applies to humans as well. Ever heard the term "doublethink"?

      Most people here on /.? Not likely.

    39. Re:Even Stranger...... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      No problem as long as it's running Office 2008.

    40. Re:Even Stranger...... by __aapspi39 · · Score: 1

      Every study that has been conducted in a genuinely scientific spirit has found that there are no real differences between racial groups in terms of the ability to benefit from education.

      This can be seen in the fact that the differences between racial groups are much smaller than the differences within those groups.

      In other words, humans are in fact equal in terms of their race.

      As for evolution, it has nothing to do with this issue. Evolution is a slow sifting of gene pools until the whole population is better suited to its environment. The type of extrapolation of natural selection to society represented by Social Darwinism and other right wing ideas. is a crude ideological justification of laissez-faire economics and eugenics. It has very little to do with science.

    41. Re:Even Stranger...... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      you can love people of one race over all others for no reason other than they are members of that race, that's still racism

      Does that make President Obama a racist just because he only dated black women? Does that make me anti-blonde because I prefer redheads?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    42. Re:Even Stranger...... by Pingmaster · · Score: 1

      That could be very well intentional. Maybe they were subtly trying to hint "hey our shit works with Mac too!" without having to actually come out and say it (and therefore have to back it up when the shit hits the fan).

    43. Re:Even Stranger...... by Aris+Katsaris · · Score: 1

      So what if I want to kill every black person in the world, not because I hate them, but because I love them and want to take them out of the misery of being black?
      No hate here, therefore it's not racism to want to kill every black person in the world, right? I only want to take them out of their misery.

      Or (to use a more realistic example) owning black slaves in the American South was likewise not racist. They didn't *hate* those black people they owned as slaves, they just wanted to use them for labour.
      It was merely greed, not hate, therefore it wasn't racist at all, according to you.

      Thinking that racism is about *hate* is the stupidest comment I've ever seen on slashdot -- it disqualifies the vast majority of human racism throughout human history (including ownership of black slaves) from being called such. Racism is about racial inequality -- expressed, preserved or utilized, by word or deed.

    44. Re:Even Stranger...... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      The only thing that's missing is an "I'm gay" sign on one of them.

      Don't overdo it. A black guy is one thing, but we're still talking Poland here, you know?

    45. Re:Even Stranger...... by houghi · · Score: 1

      He must be a redneck for not getting the joke.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    46. Re:Even Stranger...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Granted, most of the comments Archie made, are quite reminiscent of things my grandfather would have said, who was born in roughly the same time as Archie's character. While i'm sure it's quite consistent with many people's attitudes, I still find it odd that they would portray it on TV.

      You missed the point of the show -- Archie was a buffoon. The point of the show was that views like his, although still widely held, were no longer acceptable. (that is, they were the sort of opinions only suitable for grumpy old men who were out of touch with the times... which is why it was funny.) We weren't laughing with Archie, we were laughing at him.)

    47. Re:Even Stranger...... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the Indians were BETTER equipped than the US Army due to stubbornness and beaurocracy. It's foolish to think that the most well funded opponent in the conflict is the best prepared. That fallacy plays itself out quite often in history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    48. Re:Even Stranger...... by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's a white MacBook, and not a black MacBook that's been Photoshopped white?

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
    49. Re:Even Stranger...... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      1. I'm not sure who "they" are, but no, there's no conspiracy to brainwash poor immigrant children into not being racist. "They" probably have better things to do.

      2. Kids joke and so does everyone else, but there's a difference between a joke made for humor and a "joke" made to mock and exclude.

      3. You clearly have no idea what evolution is.

      As a side note, I'd love to know what fool(s) modded you up.

    50. Re:Even Stranger...... by berashith · · Score: 1

      that asian guy is a whole lot paler in the photoshopped version though.

    51. Re:Even Stranger...... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, on our TV shows and movies (not even an ad!) they have to blank out product names on Coke cans, cars, etc. They tend to drive one umbrella company's cars exclusively, for example GM or Ford if they leave the logo. I imagine using it in an advertisement for a competing product, as opposed to a movie that's an entertainment piece, would be suicide.

    52. Re:Even Stranger...... by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

      I don't know what's funnier - your comment or the fact that it was modded 'Informative'

      Some people just found out that their apartment is much bigger once they get out of the closet. I'd be appreciative of such info myself, alas all I find when I open the doors is either a stairwell or a balcony.

      --
      If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
    53. Re:Even Stranger...... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      People are not equal, true. However it is on an individual basis, not on a race basis.
      Saying all black people steal is racism, if if it is not said in hate.
      Saying all Asians are smart, also racist.

      depends on the joke.
      BTW, a dead man will never complain, since they are...dead. Try using actual logical arguments.

      no HATE is when you hate.

      Many people weren't hatefully but kept n going to 'white only' benches, bathrooms, drinking fountains was also racist.

      Blacks, asians, whites are all on the same evolutionary point, so I don't know why you even brought that up.

      oh, and studies like that are t confirm anything, there to verify. The fact that you don't understand the basics of science is ot really surprising, based on your posts..

      The studies are actually quite interesting. here is a short and simple description of one of the studies. I hope you can read at a high school level.

      http://www.livescience.com/health/050120_brain_sex.html

      What do you call three Gypsies standing in an alley with baseball bats? Waiting for you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    54. Re:Even Stranger...... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've been researching racist website recently, and they're all about love of the White Race.

      Racists aren't necessarily stupid, they just have broken thinking. They know that hate, while potent within its sphere, but going around feeling hate all the time has limited appeal and draws unwelcome attention. So they indoctrinate love of what they call the White Race, knowing that once people have bought into that abstraction they can produce unlimited quantities of hate on an as needed basis by saying that, for example, people from India are a threat to the Aryan race.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    55. Re:Even Stranger...... by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      it wasn't until years later that I really understood that there was anything wrong about the things I had said.

      Translation: they finally brainwashed you. People are not equal, never were, and never will be, no matter how hard you try to believe it.

      Acknowledging the reality of qualitative and quantitative differences is not what makes a racist. Its the evils that those differences are used to justify. Being more talented or virtuous than someone by some measure doesn't give you the right to fuck them over, or deny that you're fucking them over. The people who claim they just want to be 'honest' about racial differences are also generally loathe to admit the full seriousness of racism.

      Its true that the people who try to fight racism by pretending there are no differences are liars, and I disagree with them. But for the most part its the nastiness of the supposedly 'honest' racists that they're concerned about, and that nastiness is real.

      I will give one example....suppose you're an honest, hardworking, intelligent black man, at the bottom of some kind of abusive economic power structure. You're doing most of the work, but the good-old-boys who have inherited most of the usable the land or other resources are reaping most of the benefits from your work. For the sincere black person, it is wrong to support that, wrong to feed the powerful parasites. So over time your tend to become lazy and insolent. Your own virtue becomes conflicted, corrupted. How can you escape this? As I see it, this is the chief evil of slavery, in all of its forms. The effects are long lasting, and in a lot of ways its still going on today. Yes, white people exploit white people also, and black people exploit black people, but the white vs. black dynamic has been very strong and has caused a lot of damage. And now, the assholes who supposedly want to be 'honest' about race want to pretend that black people are statistically poorer because they're genetically inferior and have ruined their own culture. Granted, if there was not and never had been persecution by white people, black people might still be less successful by some measure. But they would have far, far fewer problems.

      (I previously posted this as AC with the formatting messed up, then logged in and fixed.)

    56. Re:Even Stranger...... by 222 · · Score: 1

      I refer to things I find unfavorable as "gay", even though I have no ill will towards the gay community and in no way associate gay sexuality with negative connotations.

      Its just really ingrained into my vocabulary.

      I'm fortunate enough to have gay friends that keep a sense of humor about it...

    57. Re:Even Stranger...... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      It's no stereotype. I'm about half-hispanic and I'm constantly slapping down my right hand that is attempting to shoplift something.

      Sometimes, I when I am cleaning the house, I start grabbing loose change and silverware and stuffing it in my pockets.

      Other times... when no one else is around... I find myself watching Univision.

    58. Re:Even Stranger...... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My understanding was that Polock jokes were started after Poland attempted to defend against a German Blitzkrieg (airforce,armor, etc.) with men on horseback equipped with weapons that were already several decades old.

      Unlikely. Most Americans would have been totally unaware of all that. My guess is that it's simply the fact that the Irish immigrants got there first.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    59. Re:Even Stranger...... by tristanreid · · Score: 1

      I think you don't get it. The problem with casually accepting jokes that stereotype is that people ARE influenced by such things. You're saying that you're making a joke based on a generalization and that nobody intelligent takes those jokes seriously. The problem is that many of those generalizations are based on extremely deep seated problems. It's the difference between joking about a good friend's mother being ugly, or joking that she has breast cancer and probably isn't going to make it.

      Many of the stereotypes of black Americans were literally created, they didn't just arrive as observations. An enslaved population will naturally be considered unworthy, inferior, unintelligent, lazy, surly, 'uppity', overly-sensitive, etc. But how does a man stand up for himself and get recognized as an individual with all of that baggage, when the stereotypes keep getting reinforced? It's one thing when the stereotypes are about a people who have their own distinct homeland and groups, but black Americans are in a place where they always feel like outsiders. Consider that your friend who is ok with such jokes may just tolerate them because he considers it the price of your friendship.

      -t.

    60. Re:Even Stranger...... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      And if you personally can't replace "gypsy" with any ethnic group and find the joke just as funny then you are stereotyping.

      I'm not sure. As a white person, I would not take offense is someone made fun of of white people mostly because I don't relate to other white people.

      Then again, white people are generally divided in general by idealogy rather than the color of our skin so if you said the same thing about democrats/republics chasing their sisters then I think more white people would take offense.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    61. Re:Even Stranger...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's possible (though I think unlikely) that that myth is the origin of Polish stereotypes. But it is definitely a myth.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_cavalry#Cavalry_charges_and_propaganda

      The Polish army did have a sizeable cavalry contingent, and it did fight in the invasion, charging at least sixteen times. But most of the charges were successful, and they didn't have lances but modern armament - the only thing antiquated about them was their sabres and their horses.

      By propagating this myth you are spreading a Nazi lie.

    62. Re:Even Stranger...... by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Wait what? It's more racist to point out racism than to market to it? How the fuck does that work?

    63. Re:Even Stranger...... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Personally, I find that the best (which are usually most subtle and yet most offensive) ethnic/racial/religious jokes usually come from the very ethnicity/race/religion they're about. Jewish ones are good example of that.

    64. Re:Even Stranger...... by abundance · · Score: 1

      Translation: they finally brainwashed you. People are not equal, never were, and never will be, no matter how hard you try to believe it. But now we need a $8 million study to acknowledge the fact that men and women think differently.

      Spot on! That's *exactly* the point. In case you never tought about it, the essence of racism is assuming that a very large group of people that happen to share some phenotypic attributes are all equally bad.

    65. Re:Even Stranger...... by BAlGaInTl · · Score: 1

      I've seen this comment posted on other sites too... Why is it funny? That is a Microsoft "business" solutions page. Last I checked, Microsoft provided business and productivity software for Apple products as well. After all, one of the biggest announcements of the OSX 10.6 is that it has native MS Exchange support. Perhaps instead, Microsoft intends to show that not only do the support the Apple products, but also interoperability with existing Windows PC platforms. Of course that is assuming that the generic (Dell) monitor is supposed to be plugged in to a Windows PC computer. It could just as easily also be connected to an Apple PC. Of course... what really happened is that the company was too cheap to buy a splitter or two sets of cables for the projector that is on the table. So, they had to disconnect the power and VGA cable from the monitor in order to display the output for the entire room. That is why she is straining so hard to see the screen at the front of the room.

    66. Re:Even Stranger...... by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you flipped the joke book over it had Irish jokes in the other half.

      Interesting point above tho, i have no idea where the stupid Polish stereotype came from.

    67. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Making a racial, religious, or cultural based joke is not "judging" a group as a whole, merely making fun of a stereotype easily formed by inductive reasoning. No intelligent person would universalize such a statement to 100% of the subject group.

      Lol. You really don't have a clue. 99.99% of the time someone makes a racial joke they are NOT making fun of the stereotype, they are applying the stereotype.

      Sarah Silverman telling her now infamous "chink joke" is an example of someone actually parodying stereotyping, the OP's joke about gypsy girls was reinforcing a stereotype.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    68. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The cold, hard truth is that all races, while wanting to be recognized as equals, insist on maintaining their specific identity, and will go at whatever lengths it takes to maintain it, even if it's at the expense of other races.

      Except that no matter the case, judging an individual by characteristics of others is bullshit. If they personally claim ownership of that stereotype, then sure go ahead. But that's a far cry from assuming that they buy into whatever "identity" you have decided to apply to them.

      Consider the word "nigger". Blacks can call each other "nigger" and it's not racist,

      Yes it is. Plenty of black people are offended by the term as reinforcing racist attitudes no matter who says it. You need to hang out with more black people if you really believe that stereotype.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    69. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      If you dated every single redhead you ever met, then yes.
      If Obama dated every single black woman he met, then yes.

      But surprise, there is more to it than just that isn't there?
      So it isn't like either of you are loving one particular group for NO OTHER REASON.

      Besides, Obama dated a haole girl in high school.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    70. Re:Even Stranger...... by junkgoof · · Score: 1

      Not to mention initially grabbing parts of Czechoslovakia instead of supporting them against invasion.

      Polish leadership was abysmal in the '30s. Actually political leadership sort of hit an international low at that time. Horrible leaders popping up everywhere.

      --
      You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
    71. Re:Even Stranger...... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      The thing is.. in assuming that the people who changed those ads had those thoughts, and tying it to the area.. you are stereotyping another group of people.. All we really know is that this ad was altered. We do not know that the people who altered it, or those that asked it to be altered, think or believe that "black people steal".. In fact it may be that they are acting on the stereotype that you make, and believe that some of their customers hold this belief.. so the "victim" of stereotyping in this case may not be the black people, but the intended audience who are assumed to be racist.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    72. Re:Even Stranger...... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      While his point could have been expressed better the fact is the use of the word nigger is not always racist except for in the eyes of mentally retarded PC thugs.

    73. Re:Even Stranger...... by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Why is it that you only tell your secrets to parentheses? Admit it, you like them better

    74. Re:Even Stranger...... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between telling the occasional joke to your best friend, who has a good idea that you don't really believe the implications of the joke, and telling it to a random stranger or a new acquaintance. Although, if you constantly make race jokes, your friend may come to believe that you really are a racist, and that he just happens to be the exception to your bigotry for whatever reason.

    75. Re:Even Stranger...... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      "Unlikely. Most Americans would have been totally unaware of all that."

      When I was a KID, these "Stupid Polock" jokes abounded, without a single one of us actually knowing a "Polock" or understanding WHY they were even being derided as stupid. But the jokes were there, nonetheless.

      While my post was not intended to be flamebait, but rather to express my disgust of the entire thread, it most certainly sparked some discussion. So are all the other child-posts flames, and if so, why not spend the mod points to label them as such?

      I suspect I offended someone of Polish descent.

    76. Re:Even Stranger...... by rpillala · · Score: 1

      He didn't say they were jokes. If he's in school saying "I don't want this black kid in my group" or "I can't believe this black kid scored higher on the test than me she must have cheated," then those things can become corrosive pretty fast.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    77. Re:Even Stranger...... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      I don't think you were supposed to identify with or agree with Archie, any more than you were supposed to agree with Al Bundy's misogyny or Karen Walker's alcoholism. The portrayal of those flaws is so over the top you're meant to laugh at the flaw, not with it.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    78. Re:Even Stranger...... by shdwsclan · · Score: 1

      This is very true.......blacks are considered as EVIL, LAZY, and the of society.....this if from a polish immigrant who came to the USA in 1993...and they ARE, there is no stereotype...well....unless you mean that they can be classified as human.. As for the asians.... Poland sees the Japanese as the cornerstone in modern human society, and it strives to be like japan and that has even been declared by the polish president....that poland will be the next japan

    79. Re:Even Stranger...... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Black people would get more sympathay if it weren't a case of them wanting the best of both worlds like any other group.

      While cracker and honky aren't as bad as nigger it is still offensive to people yet it is completely acceptablle to use it if it's no different than the jokes you complain about.

      It's a double standard and as long as it exists there will be white people wanting to "balance" it out with black jokes.

      Everyone would be better off if they realised all humans are biased against their own and grow a back bone.

    80. Re:Even Stranger...... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      It may not apply to all gypsies but if you've had to live near pikeys you'd realise it's more true than false.

      This isn't because of how people treat them, they've just always been uneducated violent shitheads.

    81. Re:Even Stranger...... by DirtyUncleRon69 · · Score: 1

      Stereotypes? Like these?

      --
      They say, "Evil prevails when good men fail to act." What they ought to say is, "Evil prevails."
    82. Re:Even Stranger...... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      You judge an entire group based on the attributes of a few individuals, but because you joke about it you aren't racist?

      "A few individuals"? Stereotypes don't get created because of the actions of "a few individuals." (That's what we're talking about here, BTW--stereotypes, not "racism.") Stereotypes are created when one observes large numbers of individuals in a particular group acting/appearing a certain way.

      Stereotypes are not in any way an invalid or distasteful way to view the world. In fact every human being on the planet (that includes you) uses stereotypes every single day to help guide his thoughts and actions. It's a subconscious thing. From a biological/survival point of view, stereotypes are an extremely useful feature, not a bug.

      Let me give you an example of a race-related stereotype that proves its validity every single night when I hear a groups of LOUD ASSES walking past my tent raising hell. Guess what race they are, 100% of the time? That's right, they're black. The black people in question are from Georgia, and black people from the south are well known for their loud, rowdy behavior. Plenty of white folks walk past too, but rarely are they ever as disruptive as the black folks are.

      If the shoe fits, wear the mother fucker instead of crying about "racism."

    83. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You are the perfect example of a racist - totally innumerate.
      How many black people walk past and aren't loud?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    84. Re:Even Stranger...... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I'm a racist? LOL dumb ass, no I'm not. I'm just not an idiot who (like you) screams "racism" every time someone makes an observation about the behaviors a certain race/class/culture tends to exhibit. How many black people walk past that aren't loud? How the fuck should I know? Just like I don't know how many white people or Mexicans walk by that aren't loud, since they're not loud and I don't know they're even walking by. Stereotypes are formed based on the things we notice, not the things we don't notice.

      The funny part is while I was reading your comment I heard yet another group of people being loud as fuck outside, waking up the whole goddamn neighborhood while it's midnight here and people are trying to sleep. When I walked outside to tell them to shut the fuck up, guess what race they turned out to be?

    85. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      How many black people walk past that aren't loud? How the fuck should I know?

      BingfuckingO. You are just so dumb you can't put two and two together unless you can see all four pieces first.
      That's the kind of innumeracy that leads to racism and the overtly loud and proud confidence that its not racism.

      Stereotypes are formed based on the things we notice, not the things we don't notice.

      You're such a fucking dumb ass that you think the world revolves around you. That if you didn't see it, it didn't happen and doesn't matter.

      Like you wrote, stereotypes are shortcuts and shortcuts aren't always the right path, else they wouldn't be a short cut, they would be the regular path. Racial stereotyping is precisely the kind of shortcut that sends you off into the boonies. You are just too fucking dumb to realize you got lost.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    86. Re:Even Stranger...... by JM78 · · Score: 1

      You can't see how someone calling out racism over a clearly non-racist marketing decision is a hypocrite?

      Tell me, for sake of argument, if an ethnic minority gets angry at you because you made eye-contact, and he claims your racist because of it - even though you just happened to look at him - who's the racist (this has actually happened to me)? The one accused or the one who can't help but see it everywhere; even when it is imagined?

      --
      I am Jack's smirking revenge.
    87. Re:Even Stranger...... by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      "You can't see how someone calling out racism over a clearly non-racist marketing decision is a hypocrite?"

      Nope, explain to me how I'm a hypocrite. Explain to me exactly what is hypocritical about saying it's racist to make a marketing decision that says, "Polish people don't identify with people who have black skin, let's target that identification with our marketing materials".

      Your example is a strawman.

    88. Re:Even Stranger...... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this discussion is for ADULTS ONLY... come back when you can put together an argument that doesn't involve spewing insults and incoherent bullshit

    89. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Sorry, this discussion is for ADULTS ONLY... come back when you can put together an argument that doesn't involve spewing insults and incoherent bullshit

      Hey dumb ass, get the fuck out of the kitchen if you can't stand the heat.
      You are the zero IQ who started in with the insults, and now you want to act all high and mighty?
      You hypocrite.
      But what else should I expect from someone who thinks the world revolves around himself?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    90. Re:Even Stranger...... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I'm not a racist, now matter what ignorant twats like you think. Go fuck yourself.

    91. Re:Even Stranger...... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I'm not a racist, now matter what ignorant twats like you think. Go fuck yourself.

      You just keep telling yourself that.
      No asshole is ever smart enough to realize he is an asshole though, self-denial is real popular with people like you.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  3. Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The racism flag seems to get trotted out a little too often these days. Statistically speaking, are there a heck of a lot of black guys in Poland? Honest question, really. I dislike Microsoft for a lot of things, but the racism tag seems a little odd; I wasn't aware they had a reputation in that department.

    1. Re:Know your market. by Digitus1337 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What parent is trying to say is that Microsoft isn't racist... Polish people are.

    2. Re:Know your market. by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Statistically, what are the chances of a perfect diversity trifecta of asian guy, black guy, and white woman? In an ad, pretty good. In real life, not so much.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Know your market. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What you seem to be saying, is that targeting a specific market is somehow racist. If your market lives in a city of a million, and the black population is around 15, putting black faces in your advert isn't going to make sales. It will only make your advert look exotic, at best.

      As I recall, Poland didn't have a civil war to free the slaves. Nor were a lot of Africans likely to immigrate to Poland during the days of the Soviet. Prior to the Soviet, Poland was more in the business of exporting people, rather than importing. Like, my great grandparents, for instance.

      Before I leave, I've just got to say, fuck politically correct. It's from the soviet union, and has no business in the free world. Fuck politically correct again, and again, you communist bastards!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    4. Re:Know your market. by MrKaos · · Score: 5, Funny

      Statistically, what are the chances of a perfect diversity trifecta of asian guy, black guy, and white woman? In an ad, pretty good. In real life, not so much.

      Rule 34?

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    5. Re:Know your market. by MaerD · · Score: 1

      Statistically, what are the chances of a perfect diversity trifecta of asian guy, black guy, and white woman? In an ad, pretty good. In real life, not so much.

      Until they walk into a bar, and a punchline runs them all over.
      But seriously I'd have to say the company I work for is pretty diverse. I've been in several meetings with 3 or more races easily represented with only 4 or 5 people in the room.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    6. Re:Know your market. by hjf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      writing from Argentina here.

      Here we don't have many black people (black as in african, but there are dark-skinned people). So it's weird here to see an ad in which a black guy is just "sitting there". you don't see that in the office. the ad is supposed to be something people can relate to, and if you're not used to seeing black people, you find it weird.

      should microsoft make a different ad, featuring white people, for poland? probably. should they photoshop-out the black guy? that's pretty lame really.

    7. Re:Know your market. by igny · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many Polish people may indeed be nationalist, they may be anti-semites, russophobes... but racists? There are just not so many black people in Poland. Microsoft was probably right thinking that having black people in the ads would not connect in a 99.9% white population.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    8. Re:Know your market. by travisb828 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They left the Asian guy, but you do have a point. When Clinton addressed the Serbian people back in the 90's they made him a little extra pasty for the audience.

    9. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I grew up in Poland (81-93). And yes there was very little diversity in our population especially coming out of the communist era, where Russian mandate purged Poland of almost all non-Natives. Which considering what they did to countries like Estonia, Latvia, and Georgia I consider generous! I would say given my experience it's not that Polish people are racist, it's more that racism is a very new concept. Having had grown up in a totally homogeneous society, I could not even conceptualize any other kind of a society. I did not consider attacking anyone just because they were different. The few people I did see that were Asian or African only invoked extreme curiosity in me.

      Then as communism fell the wave after wave of immigrants started to hit Poland. They could be seen begging for money on streets of all of our major cities. Not even sure where all of them were coming from, only thing that was apparent was there somewhat darker hue. These immigrants stoked all kinds of nationalistic feelings amongst my people, and often were met with violence. To understand such a strong response you must consider that prior to the fall of communism for many years (since the end of WW2) the word Pole was synonymous with Slavic and Catholic. There was no variation. So in essence it was as if the collective being of our society was under attack. Xenophobia was a very natural response (in a Human sense), and I believe it prevails to this day.

    10. Re:Know your market. by yoyhed · · Score: 5, Funny

      My favorite from Microsoft was for Visual C++ Express Edition. They used to have a couple of 17-18 year old Asian girls smiling and pointing at a computer screen as the headline picture for Express Edition's website. Who smiles and laughs at code with a friend anyway? Not hot Asian chicks.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    11. Re:Know your market. by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Prior to the Soviets? During the Soviets, my dearly departed grandmother was "exported" from Poland to a Siberian labor camp (as was the rest of her family), mostly since her father was a war hero in the earlier Polish-Bolshevik war. (He got some of the townsfolk from the nearby village of to help pull a few big machine-gun caissons out of a ditch, and subsequently helped save the rear ends of the retreating Polish cavalry. I don't think the Soviets liked the family. Too much initiative.)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    12. Re:Know your market. by Thantik · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I hate to be so blunt...

      Then why'd they leave the asian guy in there? There a lot more asians in poland than blacks?

    13. Re:Know your market. by AHuxley · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Poland like many parts of Eastern Europe did 'clean' up after ww2 by driving out anyone not Polish.
      The last months of 1945-46 did let many parts of the Eastern Europe become very "homogeneous".
      Decades later you can blame the Germans up to 45, the Soviets post 45.
      In reality the locals did sort things out in a very permanent way.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:Know your market. by lennier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Speaking for myself, as a New Zealander, when I see African-looking people as the carefully-selected diverse-skin-tone group for a posed ad -- as opposed to Pacific Island or Asian, which are the faces we really see here -- it automatically makes me think "American". It's roughly the same effect as having people wearing cowboy hats and speaking in a twang.

      And that's generally an instant negative effect. It means you're saying "1. We're not a local company. 2. We're owned by some big American corporation you've never heard of who's never heard of you. 3. We're either too out of touch or too lazy to produce localised ad cop. 4. We're probably not going to localise any other resources for you, just design a one-size-fits-all media set in Texas and print 'em in China. 5. We're not going to listen to anything you have to say or care what your market segment thinks. 7. But we did run our media buy past our New York-based sensitivity screening group, so yay diversity!"

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    15. Re:Know your market. by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are just not so many black people in Poland.

      Mod parent up. People in Central Europe don't give a shit about USian prejudices. We have our own.

      Do you hate gypsies?

    16. Re:Know your market. by bz386 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mod parent up. People that regard this as racist have probably never been to Poland or any other Eastern European country. For historical reasons, you will very rarely see black or Asian people in any of those countries. Having an ad with a black person is just not believable. Personally if I saw a local add like that in my home country it would immediately say "ah, this is obviously a US add, so the product is probably very US centric", simply because the ad shows a black person. This is not racist, it is just a fact. Americans probably don't notice it, but for "political correctness" reasons many American publications always made sure that every group of people they showed always had a mix of races/types of people. If you ever watched a cheap teen movie that has a story about some group of kids, the group would always have some white kids, one of them being fat, at least one Asian guy and at least one black guy. Not having this combination of races/types of people in the movie would be considered politically incorrect in the US. Seeing a group of people of mixed races is an everyday and normal thing. Seeing a group of people of mixed races in Eastern Europe is a rare occurrence, so a picture with a black person will immediately tell you that the picture was most probably made outside of the country. Imagine an ad showing a couple driving to work in a car - a Volga Coupe. Would this ad be believable to you if it was shown in the US? No, because you would never see that car driving down an American freeway. What the ad does show is that Microsoft is cheap. Instead of taking a new photo, adopted to the local market, they just photoshoped an existing one - badly.

    17. Re:Know your market. by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because some Polish folks have Asia based blood in them, thank you, Genghis Khan you insufferable bastard!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    18. Re:Know your market. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Citation? I'm aware of one war atrocity instigated by Poles against Jews during WW2. I know that being Polish doesn't make anyone an angel, but I'm simply not aware of the Poles driving anyone out of Poland.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:Know your market. by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      The tag of the ad is "Empower your people" (my bold). It's not likely that the Polish people would think that the ad is targeted to them if it includes blacks (when there are probably only 50 blacks in the entire Poland), but at the same time it's strange the that the Asian guy was left alone, I doubt there are more Asians in Poland than blacks.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    20. Re:Know your market. by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I did gloss over the years of the Soviet. No disrespect meant - I am aware of the millions of people who disappeared into the salt mines, the forests, and the tundra of Siberia. A few were even American citizens. http://www.videofact.com/english/gulags7.htm I can't remember the man's name right now, but one American pilot was finally freed some years back, and living in Chicago. I read an interview that he did with someone, but can't even remember who interviewed him.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    21. Re:Know your market. by Higaran · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polish_census_of_2002 If you look at the last census, there is probably a few black people, but the don't come from any african nation. The are probably from the british and americans, or possible greek, itialan or russians. Being from poland myself, I can gurantee that the few that are in poland are mostly in the larger cities, and not any of the small farms.

    22. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    23. Re:Know your market. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      The racism flag seems to get trotted out a little too often these days.

      Come on. Everyone known those stupid polacks are dirty racists :o)

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    24. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a "current" Pole (born 82) I have to say that I mainly agree with you. None the less I don't think that we are xenophobic. Some fringe cases, as for instance the ultra right wing minded and older people brought up in a different time are, as they always (or most of the time) are in other countries as well. But I wouldn't say that Poles in general are xenophobic or racism. The fact is that we didn't really have any diversity in society for a very long time and just now we begin to learn about new cultures, new people and so one. As you've said we are mostly curious.

      As to the matter at hand, Microsoft Poland did the "right" thing. A black (sorry I don't know what the PC way is of saying that :-)) man is a very rare thing in Poland, doubly so in a business context. So the ad wouldn't be as believable with him in it. The quality of the work is something completely diffrent

    25. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The penalty for protecting a Jew was the death of the entire family. Couple that with all the Volksdeutches - ie ethnic Germans who only spoke Polish in western parts of Poland who happily collaborated with the Germans I would say you are full of BS. Poland invited most of the Jews in the middle ages and had some of the most progressive anti-discrimination laws - the fact that it was so full of Jews proves that - they enjoyed living there.

      Please learn your history and stop calling everyone anti-semitic, because you're anti-Polish and Jews are not more special than anyone else. 'Anti-semitic my-behind', you anti-Polish bigot.

    26. Re:Know your market. by NewsWatcher · · Score: 1

      There are just not so many black people in Poland. Microsoft was probably right thinking that having black people in the ads would not connect in a 99.9% white population.
      Because white people can never connect with black people?
      It is thinking like that which meant the Rwandan genocide happened without the United Nations lifting a finger, and that the genocide in Sudan is heading the same way.
      I am not black, but I have no problems identifying with a black businessman, nor an Asian one.
      I can't imagine I am alone in this. I have black hair, and can also relate pretty well to people with red or brown hair.

      --
      If the pattern goes 9am, 10am, 11am, why isn't noon 12am?
    27. Re:Know your market. by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      Many Polish peoples are also racists. Not a representative group, but they do exist. I've met some of them, some are otherwise really smart.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    28. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Poland has an unfortunate history both during and directly after the war, extending into the 60s. The embarassing reaction to the relatively recent release of Jan T Gross's book (hereby incorporated by reference) in which the former Kaczynski, the former Primitive Polish Prime minister even tried to prosecute the author.

      It's important to remember that during the war the Poles had much harder situations for rescuing Jews than in most other countries (you risked your entire family going to a concentration camp; elsewhere you risk only yourself and only prison) and many still did. It's also worth remembering that the reason Jews were in Poland was because they were historically treated better there than elsewhere. Poland is much further along coming to terms with and apologizing (though with reservations) for it's former anti-semitism (even Kaczynski has made efforts to return passports to the victims of the 60s) than a number of surrounding countries.

      Essentially anyone who tells you that Poles are all good is a Holocaust revisionist. As is anyone who tells you that they are all bad.

      In all cases where I referenced Wikipedia, all references in the page references are incorporated by reference as material to read. There; is that enough citations for you?

    29. Re:Know your market. by zero0ne · · Score: 1

      oh please, everybody knows that cowboy hats are the "in" thing these days...

    30. Re:Know your market. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      OMG where's number 6?!

      Number 6 was considered inflammatory towards the Maori and so was removed.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    31. Re:Know your market. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Duh. This is /.

      6. ???
      7. Profit!!

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    32. Re:Know your market. by evanspw · · Score: 1

      And that's just the tip of it. There were also very large scale mutual expulsions between Poland and Ukraine, and Poland and Belarus, with several million people uprooted, and a great many deaths. Europe (mainly Eastern) was a difficult place to be after four years of total war and ethnic conflict, to put it mildly, the the rest of the world didn't give a damn (and then the same palaver was repeated within India and then China (and on a smaller scale, Palestine). The late 1940s were times of great ethnic cleansing that the West pretty much ignored after the agony of WW2.

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
    33. Re:Know your market. by Cadallin · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      At the very least, this sort of thing is in remarkably poor taste. Its done in a very unprofessional way, which IMO sends the wrong signals and reinforces a perception of racism. Had they actually substituted in a real picture which had only whites, instead of just "hiding the Black Guy" it would be far less obvious that was the intent. Instead they've crudely modified a picture in such a way that its clear their intention WAS to "hide the black guy."

      It definitely reveals racism somewhere, and Microsoft's (Poland Office?) concern about appeasing it, if not acting on internal racism.

      Seriously. Its a professionally dressed dark skinned man. Is that so offensive to delicate Polish sensibilities? Why? Even if there's not a single dark skinned man in all of Poland, why should it be a problem?

      If you'd care to offer one, I'd like to hear your explanation for modifying a picture to remove a depiction of a person of a specific ethnicity that doesn't fundamentally boil down to racism.

    34. Re:Know your market. by evanspw · · Score: 1

      The Poles (and everyone else in Europe) always hates the Gypsies. With great racist fervour.

      --
      Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
    35. Re:Know your market. by agravier · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point out that this is a revisionist post modded "4, Insightful".

    36. Re:Know your market. by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      Oh and this crudely photoshopped image is better? After all, nothing says "We Care" like 5 seconds of photo manipulation. Even in the most favorable interpretation, this image indicates whoever made the decision didn't give a shit enough to actually use an appropriate photo for the ad.

    37. Re:Know your market. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

      According to the CIA World Factbook:

      Polish 96.7%,
      German 0.4%,
      Belarusian 0.1%, Ukrainian 0.1%,
      other and unspecified 2.7% (2002 census)

      2.7% doesn't seem like a lot.

          Someone else mentioned that they should have ditched the Asian also. Maybe they simply wanted a majority white, rather than 33% white. Or maybe the asian was far enough out of the focus of the image that they didn't really care.

          It's all about marketing though. I'm sure they've done more market research than we could possibly speculate on. But, being that this is Slashdot, we'll speculate anyways.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    38. Re:Know your market. by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 1

      a perfect diversity trifecta of asian guy, black guy, and white woman? In an ad, pretty good. In real life, not so much.

      I somehow read that as "asian guy, black woman, white baby". But then I thought "that's unlikely in an ad, but not so much in real life".

    39. Re:Know your market. by JordanL · · Score: 1

      Fine, I have karma to burn. Waste some more mod points.

    40. Re:Know your market. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Yes I don't think this is racist. In the country where I live, there are virtually no black people. I mean, it's a tiny, vanishingly small percentage. On the street I might see one per year, if I'm lucky. Plenty of east Asians, plenty of south Asians, plenty of Pacific Islanders and so on. But virtually no 'black' people of the appearance of the man in the pre-photoshopped picture (i.e. African/African-American looking).

      Any advertisement that has a suspiciously equal-looking mix of smiling white, Asian and black people on it just screams "copy+paste from an American powerpoint slide/advertisement". Subtly it actually turns people off, I think ("this big-shot American company thinks it can just come in here and win business by recycling their stuff from home, without regard to local culture and customs etc"). If you never see a black person why would you feature them in an ad? It'd be the same if I went to Namibia or Ghana or something and tried to sell someone there a software solution by handing out glossy pictures of white/Anglos all over it - it would just seem a bit bizarre.

      So no, not racist. Just a lazy and rushed job in producing local material for the MS Poland website :)

    41. Re:Know your market. by Trepidity · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Companies routinely do a lot of other things that couldn't be called racist very easily, in order to match their target audience. For southern European audiences, for example, people with blonde hair are airbrushed or swapped out to avoid making the ad seem too foreign.

    42. Re:Know your market. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      I've never been to Poland. But you would sorta expect there to be far more Asians than blacks there, given history and geographical proximity between Asia/Europe (well really it's just one large continent of Eurasia).

    43. Re:Know your market. by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      And that's why we don't see black people on the ad, right? No?
      Then how could this post be insightful.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    44. Re:Know your market. by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bill Clinton isn't black?

    45. Re:Know your market. by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Statistically, what are the chances of a perfect diversity trifecta of asian guy, black guy, and white woman? In an ad, pretty good.

      In an American ad ... yes, very good chances. I've noticed that in the US you tend to skew images for public consumption (such as ads or brochures) towards showing equal amounts of the major ethnic groups living in the US. Even when they actual statistical distribution of the population is nowhere near equal. Forgive my ignorance, but my uneducated guess is that perhaps there is a law in the US that says you must do this?

      The country I live in (Australia) is fairly multicultural (we are a nation built on immigration much like the US, and a full 1 in 4 Australians alive today was born overseas). But in ads we still tend to show a mix of people that is statistically similar to what you'd see just walking around on the street. I.e. maybe two-thirds white, the rest Asian/southern European/Pacific Islander/Aboriginal etc.

    46. Re:Know your market. by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      it automatically makes me think "American".

      Pretty much any picture where obviously boring and unrealistically diverse people are fakely smiling for no apparent reason whilst wearing pastel coloured sweaters or light gray suits, it screams "american" to me. The second feeling I get is nausea from the candy-coated overdose of political correctness. Can anybody here identify with any of the people on that Microsoft photo?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    47. Re:Know your market. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      You are going to get so many troll replies after that, despite being genuinely insightful.

      "Trollbait"?

    48. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Considering how often idiots everywhere in the media have been trotting out "racist!" in the last 6 months, I'm prone to support MS in their whitewashing in this instance. I am so, so very sick and tired of all this "racist" shit flying around, most often from the Left to the Right (politically speaking).

      In the media, it has happened repeatedly that someone says "behavior made by so-and-so is racist" and then the media turns around and labels -those- comments as racist. The fuck? On both counts, honestly. Can we try and use different words, maybe? Words which haven't been pushed to the point of uselessness due to having been excessively gamed for political and financial gain and have reached the level of a curse word in our modern lexicon? The damn word has been used - successfully - to damn people many, many times in the eyes of the public for acts which may or may not have actually -been- racist, particularly in context. The media (you know, the one that wanted to leave the era of race behind us, back in November) is pushing this 'racism' agenda and is seemingly trying to create the new "Jew". It's sickening.

      And no, it's not JUST "the media". It's our whole damn society. Say you don't like rap music? Someone might accuse you of racism. Shit, Bill Cosby has been accused of as much for ripping into black "culture". (Personally, I think the comments that Beck made were intended to convey the same 'cultural ambivalence' that Cosby did; but unlike Cosby, Beck is a bit of a tool and not all together good with words.)

      Yeah, anyway. So, no, it wasn't cool for MS to hire a company to do that, but it's flippin' marketing. That's what marketing does: lies, cajoles, distorts, and tries to pull the wool over the consumer's eyes. It's they're job. It's detestable, but expecting anything else is like expecting a dog to not shit on the carpet (bad dog! bad!)

      That doesn't mean I don't think we should helm a ship with robots and give all the marketeers and lawyers a free trip to China via the Atlantic Divide.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    49. Re:Know your market. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      If your market lives in a city of a million, and the black population is around 15, putting black faces in your advert isn't going to make sales. It will only make your advert look exotic, at best.

      Which works. The first piece of junk mail I got when I moved to Japan was a flyer for an Eikaiwa (English Conversation School) featuring a picture of Celine Dion. Sigh.

      The (before he was Governor) Arnold beer commercials were great. http://www.bintulu.org/news/2009/08/20/watch-arnold-schwarzenegger-japanese-commercials.php

      Tiger Woods was used to advertise Wonderful, Wonderful, Wonda (a brand of canned coffee). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQdeV64oc4o

      Very gutless on Microsoft's part. If the identical picture wasn't appropriate, why not just take a different picture?

    50. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Many Polish people may indeed be nationalist, they may be anti-semites, russophobes... but racists?

      I'm seeing/hearing a lot of sentiments like this lately. If being anti-Semite or a Russophobe isn't "racist", then what is it? Are you to say that "racist" can only be applied against someone who's "hating" on "black" people? That's absurd. It leaves absolutely no classification/terminology (that I'm aware of) for people who are afraid of/hate Western Europeans (and those of their descent, commonly called "white"), Mexican, or the like.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    51. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you hate gypsies?

      Yes, actually (see, I'm from Eastern Europe, too). Though I don't consider it racism, because the hatred isn't towards race or ethnicity - it is towards a specific culture (I wonder if there's a term for that), which, IMO, is really deserving it. A gypsy who doesn't live like one isn't one anymore, as far as I'm concerned.

    52. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I think its highly offensive you Americans do not have Australian Aboriginals in all your movies, TV shows and advertisements. Are images of Australian Aboriginals so offensive to your delicate American sensibilities? Why? Even if there's not a single Australian Aboriginal in all of the USA, why should it be a problem?

      If you'd care to offer one, I'd like to hear your explanation for not depicting a person of Australian Aboriginal descent in any advertisement or show that doesn't fundamentally boil down to racism.

    53. Re:Know your market. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Sounds like any given street corner in Seattle...or some pretty wild porn.

      Or both.

    54. Re:Know your market. by mpe · · Score: 1

      As to the matter at hand,

      Pun, presumably unintended.

      Microsoft Poland did the "right" thing. A black (sorry I don't know what the PC way is of saying that :-)) man is a very rare thing in Poland, doubly so in a business context. So the ad wouldn't be as believable with him in it. The quality of the work is something completely diffrent.

      It's not as if you can't find models and photographers in Poland. So why not just take a new photograph?

    55. Re:Know your market. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      And even living in the US, I'm automatically put off by businesses that use stock business photos on their web site. I'm sure those made sense when they were first used, but now that there is no barrier to entry to using such pictures, and now that everybody is using those pictures the same way. It just seems like a mindless/pointless dis-genuine business practice.

      And I don't like to do business with mindless fake companies, I'm sure no one else does too. It's just that most executives/marketers don't have the balls to challenge conventional corporate habits.

    56. Re:Know your market. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Actually, the black guy looks "wrong" too - unless he's got some really weird form of acromegaly or something, his head is far too big for the rest of him.

    57. Re:Know your market. by jedrek · · Score: 1

      And the fact that we have a non-trivial asian population thanks to our business dealings with the far east since the wall fell.

    58. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's something nobody ever considers: what makes different skin colors "diverse"? They don't; they make people different colors. Associating race/color with diversity is a slight to all people, as it in and of itself is truly racist: "Oh, look; he has different color skin. He must be different/exciting/exotic/angry/mean/fun!" No, he's just a man - like you and like me, and every other goddamn man on this planet. (We then go on to associate their skin color or features with their behavior, as is biologically imperative, just as a soldier learns what an enemy combatant's uniform looks like or a dog learns that a specific bag that comes into the house every once in a while has treats.)

      Also, xenophobic and racist have two very distinctly different meanings. Racism is a hatred of an "essence" of a person's race, and those people; xenophobia is a fear (and maybe hatred) of outside cultures and forces, which is much more understandable (and natural, as such things tend to be disruptive.) What I suspect has happened in Poland (and has/is happening in many other places as well) is that it's an internal struggle trying to deal with what is seen as an invading culture and way of life - fear and anger at their structured world being disrupted, and someone 'forcing' change around them in their environment. Look at the Balkans for a perfect example: many distinctly different cultures, but all (mostly) very genetically similar people, yet... chaos. Their cultures are night and day from each other, resulting in an ethnic clusterf*ck.

      I think people in today's 'diverse' and 'connected' world need to take a step back and look at what used to make sense, in so many ways: good fences make good neighbors. All this cultural "blending" (which doesn't happen, ethnic ghettos form with a few stragglers leave to join the 'parent' culture to give the appearance of diversity) is not going to end well for anyone.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    59. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      It's on the bed right next to the 9; 8 is supposedly filming.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    60. Re:Know your market. by jedrek · · Score: 1

      There are blacks in Poland, and they came straight form Africa. I know a couple of them, mostly men (I've met one black woman here), usually came here to study, met a girl or found a job, decided to stay. There's also quite a few mixed race kids. It's not really 100% whitey over here. More like 99.99%.

    61. Re:Know your market. by jedrek · · Score: 1

      2.7% of Poland's population is still over 1 million people

    62. Re:Know your market. by mqduck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Many Polish people may indeed be ... anti-semites ... but racists?

      What the hell are you talking about?

      --
      Property is theft.
    63. Re:Know your market. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I've been in several meetings with 3 or more races easily represented with only 4 or 5 people in the room.

      I can't say that I've ever had that experience in my 3 decades of work experience spread across North America and Asia. Probably the closest would be a staff meeting with ~10 people of 3 different races (white, indian and vietnamese).

      Diversity isn't necessarily a Good Thing and the most difficult moment (racially) that I've ever had in the office was when I did an inadvertent insult to a coworker in England that escalated due to differences in British English and American English.

      Oh and neither of my two sons are white (they're PhilAm) and I'm following my job to India and looking forward to the opportunity to meet new people.

    64. Re:Know your market. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Who smiles and laughs at code with a friend anyway? Not hot Asian chicks.

      You've never been to Japan ...

    65. Re:Know your market. by mpe · · Score: 1

      People in Central Europe don't give a shit about USian prejudices. We have our own.

      Which may not align very well with those used in the US.
      An interesting test would be if it's possible to tell the origin of a question about ethnic origin.

    66. Re:Know your market. by genik76 · · Score: 1

      No, it's only racist in the minds of those people, who think that black and white men are not equal. It's about demographics.

    67. Re:Know your market. by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      It's not as if you can't find models and photographers in Poland. So why not just take a new photograph?

      Because they only needed one head :D

      Although I guess I would feel a bit pissed if my head was replaced for something like this. Then again, I do understand the need to create the impression that this is 'you' working here. The annoyance would probably come from the feeling that 'was I really the only thing that didn't match the workplace over there?'. Considering that if they took a new photo, there would probably be some more localization than my head...

      --
      It is what it is.
    68. Re:Know your market. by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      and who knows better what hot Asian chicks are doing then we on Slashdot, right?

      --
      839*929
    69. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, not very surprising given what Germans did to Polish people during the war. Not that the expulsion was a nice thing to do, but killing several millions of Polish citizens wasn't nice either: between 14% and 17% of 1939 population of Poland died during the war, 600,000 people were left disabled. Polish capital, Warsaw was destroyed in 80%, 800 000 Warsaw citizens died (out of 1.3 mln in 1939). Add to this a total destruction of economy (70% of industry, 22% of farming, 30% of forests) and what happened to Germans after the war shouldn't be too surprising. Compare it to how US (over)reacts through its recent history.

    70. Re:Know your market. by mpe · · Score: 1

      I've never been to Poland. But you would sorta expect there to be far more Asians than blacks there, given history and geographical proximity between Asia/Europe (well really it's just one large continent of Eurasia).

      Consider that all of North Asia is one country. The "Asians" you'd most expect to find in Poland would be Russians.

    71. Re:Know your market. by jacekjk · · Score: 1

      A very nice post. Actually, anyone who tells you that some nation is all good or all bad, is lying :-) Also a lot of people who are happy to attack Polish people for their attitude towards Jews, should look at their own country first and see what happened there during WW2. Jews didn't just hop into trains to extermination camps located in Poland.

    72. Re:Know your market. by moon3 · · Score: 1

      You do not show white people in Nigeria to boost your business either. Normal business sense.

    73. Re:Know your market. by mpe · · Score: 1

      It'd be the same if I went to Namibia or Ghana or something and tried to sell someone there a software solution by handing out glossy pictures of white/Anglos all over it - it would just seem a bit bizarre.

      It would be just as strange if the people were obviously American from their clothes even if they were all dark skinned. It would also be unwise to use the term "African-American" anywhere in Africa. At best it's a sign of a "clueless American", at worst it's considered to be swearing.

    74. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ah, the "I'm not racist, because they deserve it" card. Well played, sir.

    75. Re:Know your market. by Jurily · · Score: 1

      A gypsy who doesn't live like one isn't one anymore, as far as I'm concerned.

      Therein lies the problem: the term gypsy means both ethnicity and lifestyle. There is no distinction analogous to "black guy" and "nigger".

      Anyway, what do you call a gypsy in a suit? Defendant.

    76. Re:Know your market. by MWojcik · · Score: 1

      Poland, as in Polish people did not drive out anyone. USSR did, together with USA and UK - they decided in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_Conference on our new borders, moved Polish citizens from our pre-war territory and moved German citizens to new German Democratic Republic. We didn't have anything to say about it.

    77. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have no desire to make excuses for the atrocities that Nazis committed in Poland during WW2. I was merely answering the question regarding expulsion of Germans from Poland, which did happen.

      And it should also be noted that most of the Germans were expelled from areas that used to be part of Germany, not areas that Germany conquered from Poland during the war.

      Also, atrocity is an atrocity. Driving people from their homes through threats (and sometimes more than just threats) of violence is an atrocity that should be condemned. Yes, Poland went through hell and back during the war. Does that make it OK for them to mistreat others in return? Is it OK to mistreat Germans because some other Germans did some shitty things?

      After the Holocaust and WWII in general, you could make a decent argument that the German language should only live on in Hell.

      No you could not. Or are you saying that we would be better off today, had Germans been exterminated during and after WW2? To me it seems that modern Germany makes a positive contribution to the World, a contribution that we would lack, had history taken the course you desire. And how exactly would the Allied been one bit better than Nazis were, had they started killing surrendered Germans in their millions?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    78. Re:Know your market. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know the feeling. My hometown of ~10k must've had 5 black people in it. It was so rare seeing one, that I couldn't help but stare. Looking back, I wonder if that made them uncomfortable. :P

      But I also stared when I met a guy 4" 3'

    79. Re:Know your market. by ciderVisor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't remember the man's name right now, but one American pilot was finally freed some years back, and living in Chicago. I read an interview that he did with someone, but can't even remember who interviewed him.

      +5 Informative.

      --
      Squirrel!
    80. Re:Know your market. by MWojcik · · Score: 1

      Does that make it OK for them to mistreat others in return? Is it OK to mistreat Germans because some other Germans did some shitty things?

      You're asking wrong nation. We didn't have anything to say about new borders and moving the population (both Polish and German). It was decided and done by USSR and their troops.

    81. Re:Know your market. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      He's presumably referring to civilians of German ancestry (some of whom had been there a long toime), not the Wermacht & Waffen SS. Are you being intentionally obtuse?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    82. Re:Know your market. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No, what parent is trying to say that it's generally a good idea to picture the sort of people you expect to sell to. If you want to sell to farmers, you'll not show bankers in your ads, and vice versa. Since there are very few black people in Poland, there's no point in showing black people in ads (unless you want to convey a specific message by doing so).
      Of course photoshopping away the black person is silly. After all, Microsoft should be able to afford shooting the picture again with white people (possibly even Polish-looking people!).

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    83. Re:Know your market. by ciderVisor · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's on the bed right next to the 9; 8 is supposedly filming.

      In the previous scene, 7 ate 9.

      --
      Squirrel!
    84. Re:Know your market. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fuck? Now the god damn porn has to be PC?!

      You really don't want Mac porn!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    85. Re:Know your market. by Yeti.SSM · · Score: 1

      It's obvious! They've run out of white in MS Paint (cue General Protection Fault).

      Seriously, there's not much Asians in Poland either but the skin color difference of an Asian and Pole is not that striking IMHO.

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
    86. Re:Know your market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I am from NZ as well. Do you live the South island(the South island is A LOT whiter than the North island) per chance? As I live in Hamilton and there are certainly a lot of Somalis(many work in the halal processing areas of meat works all over NZ) here, as well as other africans and other dark skinned people(particularly Fijians and Indians of which there are and have been substantial numbers in NZ for quite a few years.). Pacific Island is a bit much to group together in terms of a general appearance, the Micronesian, Melanesian(literally means islands of the black skinned people) and Polynesians all look quite different to me.
      I was also aware of Africans being from africa and of the slave trade from a very early age, but maybe I had better/different teachers?

    87. Re:Know your market. by abies · · Score: 1

      Statistically speaking, are there a heck of a lot of black guys in Poland?

      Probably 1 in 1000 in bigger cities. None at all in smaller ones. My mother-in-law (around 55 now probably) has seen black person on the street first time in her life 2 years ago when she came to visit us in Frankfurt. She is coming from small town (35k population), but it is not a complete backwater village.

      From my observations (growing up in Poland), most of the visibly foreign people were met around the universities. You will have probably around 1:50 ratio there. I know that in other cities there are considerable populations of Asian people centered around trading sites - but generally, Asian looking people are a lot more common in Poland overall compared to the black people.

      Said that, it is not preventing some of my collegues from being heavily racist in private talks.

    88. Re:Know your market. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You prefer that to the ones with the plastic dinosaur heads? Man, are you weird!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    89. Re:Know your market. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would also add that Poland is often seen in Europe as our Texas : they are fervently catholic, anti-gay, anti-abortion, and in favor of death penalty (despite it being abolished on all EU). Sorry AC, I know all Poles are not like that, but your leadership really doesn't make Poland the most sexy country to be in when you don't obey the Pope's commands.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    90. Re:Know your market. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      "Do you hate gypsies?"

      YES. I live in New York City and in my area we have a few in the neighborhood. I have never been more repulsed by a group of people. They walk around trying to get money by repairing dents in cars. They leave the cans of paint, and bondo all over the sidewalk where they worked on the car. Its a belief they are the ones who dent cars in parking lots and then come by offering to fix the damage. The other great part is how the women will load up a shopping cart at the local supermarket, then walk around the store and beg for money to pay for it. If you own a store the kids come in trying to buy something for pennies on the dollar. I caught one trying to steal while another distracted me with his constant fast talking bargaining. And when they come into your shop its a posse of about 6-8 to distract you while they try to steal. Then they speak romani right in front of you so you don't know what they are talking about or plotting. Romani is their own language, only they speak it so its like a secret language. I got fed up with them and flat out told them to get the fuck out of my building and never step foot on my property again. They got the message. The group near us are the romani people who originated from India. They are so inbred that a few I have seen were deformed and severely mentally handicapped.

      Bottom line, if they all disappeared tomorrow they wouldn't be missed by a single person.

    91. Re:Know your market. by tonique · · Score: 1

      Or the late Michael Jackson... Black to White, male to female!

    92. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Did you miss the "I'm not racist because it's not a race" part of it?

      Or are you one of those people who jumps at every opportunity to call everyone racist because you're so insecure about yourself? "white guilt", perhaps?

    93. Re:Know your market. by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      "Can anybody here identify with any of the people on that Microsoft photo?"
      Michael Jackson?

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    94. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      You're asking wrong nation. We didn't have anything to say about new borders and moving the population (both Polish and German). It was decided and done by USSR and their troops.

      Who is "we" in this context? Besides, Germans were being mistreated by the Poles (and Russians). The act of driving them from their homes is mistreatment in on itself. And even on individual level, there were lots of Poles mistreating Germans (and there were lots of Poles who helped the Germans). It's quite dishonest to claim that the expulsions were done by the Russians, and Poland had nothing to do with it.

      No, I'm not trying to claim that Germans were the "good guys" and Poles were the "bad guys" of the war. That would be ludicrous. I'm just disputing the idea that Poland and Poles never did anything bad to Germans after the war. You don't displace millions of people and then claim that "nothing bad happened". I believe that the modern word for that is "ethnic cleansing", and it's considered to be a crime against humanity these days.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    95. Re:Know your market. by Jurily · · Score: 1

      They walk around trying to get money by repairing dents in cars. They leave the cans of paint, and bondo all over the sidewalk where they worked on the car. Its a belief they are the ones who dent cars in parking lots and then come by offering to fix the damage. The other great part is how the women will load up a shopping cart at the local supermarket, then walk around the store and beg for money to pay for it. If you own a store the kids come in trying to buy something for pennies on the dollar. I caught one trying to steal while another distracted me with his constant fast talking bargaining. And when they come into your shop its a posse of about 6-8 to distract you while they try to steal.

      Are you sure they didn't come from Hungary?

    96. Re:Know your market. by muzicman · · Score: 1

      Depends if she is getting gang raped....

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flamebait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    97. Re:Know your market. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      +5 Informative.

      +5 Funny :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    98. Re:Know your market. by VJ42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Though I don't consider it racism, because the hatred isn't towards race or ethnicity - it is towards a specific culture

      The Romani Gypsies prevalent in eastern Europe are an ethnic group, not a cultural one, so yes it is racism. Irish and "New age" travelers are a separate group and not properly referred to as Gypsies.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    99. Re:Know your market. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Okay you first rant about how the colour of one's skin doesn't matter -- that's true, it should not. However, it sadly does matter to a lot of people, who have associations deeply rooted in their minds. Not sure why you then go on about diversity -- presumably, you're saying that since the colour of people's skin is irrelevant, the colour of the skin of people in ads is irrelevant as well, and does not represent diversity. Well, the colour is not irrelevant, since people are racist, and displaying this kind of faux-diversity is a way of showing that you do not support this racism. The same goes for gender, incidently.

      And then you rant about how there's an internal struggle to deal with an "invading" culture, disrupted worlds and forced changes to the environment. I'm not sure what you imagine Poland looks like, but I'm pretty sure that going by the statistics and not racist propaganda, there is no invading culture, no disrupted world and no changes to the environment that weren't brought on by other reasons. According to WP, Poland is very ethnically homogeneous, although I hasten to add that it's dangerous to quote WP on such possibly disputed topics.

      Oh yeah and then you go and refer to the Balkans - the Balkans! - on an example why a mix of different ethnicities has to result in chaos. Well if it's in a society built on 500 years of stupidly reinforced mutual hatred it might result in chaos. People's culture doesn't need to be very different for that to happen.

      The last paragraph tops it off with stale racist, oh sorry, xenophobic rhetoric. Good job! Enjoy your fences, maybe you should build a wall!

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    100. Re:Know your market. by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      In the USA they're more likely to be Irish travelers than Romani Gypsies. People always class them all as "Gypos"

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    101. Re:Know your market. by Andruxa · · Score: 1

      Poland like many parts of Eastern Europe did 'clean' up after ww2 by driving out anyone not Polish. The last months of 1945-46 did let many parts of the Eastern Europe become very "homogeneous". Decades later you can blame the Germans up to 45, the Soviets post 45. In reality the locals did sort things out in a very permanent way.

      Eastern europe has always been and still is very ethnically mixed. The only cleanup that was done there was the ethnical cleansing Germans tried and of course the retalliation against german minority after the war. Soviets never did a cleanup based on race or ethnical group, but rather an ideological one. You sir, don't know what you are talking about. At all. Some poles may be racist some may not. But not against the african immigrants, since the 5 black people that live in poland just don't bother anyone. But poles are known to be more of the religious fascists if you must know. They are fanatic catholics and they are the border country of catholicism on the east. Typical pole would probably rather kill an orthodox ukrainian than an catholic black guy ....

    102. Re:Know your market. by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Diversity isn't necessarily a Good Thing and the most difficult moment (racially) that I've ever had in the office was when I did an inadvertent insult to a coworker in England that escalated due to differences in British English and American English.

      That depends on who you're working with, for a while I (as male of Indian origin), shared an office with a half-Greek bloke, a polish woman, a black woman (Nigerian origin) and a "regular" white woman*.

      It was great, because we all knew how to take a joke, so a lot of our banter was "racist" but everyone got their fair share and it was funny as hell. Everyone knew that we weren't out to offend each other, but just have a laugh.

      Watching a bearded Greek bloke going "wass up my nigga" to a black woman who would never speak like that is actually funnier than it sounds; the two are still very good friends.


      *Actually all of us except the polish woman were actually born here in the UK

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    103. Re:Know your market. by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I still dont follow the logic. I'm from Russia where black folks are even rarer than in Poland. Yet I don't find anything "unbelievable" in the original photo. It is rasist and insulting that the Polish suffer from cognitive dissonance upon seeing a black guy in the office setting. It's not like it was a polar bear in a suit.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    104. Re:Know your market. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Many Polish people may indeed be nationalist, they may be anti-semites, russophobes... but racists? There are just not so many black people in Poland. Microsoft was probably right thinking that having black people in the ads would not connect in a 99.9% white population.

      This is what always makes me laugh in the AdultFriendFinder advertisements. There will be a picture of a blue-eyed blonde girl with an advertisement for finding sluts in a nearby Arab village. I don't think that blue eyes or blonde hair have ever lived in that village. If they want to be just a bit more convincing, show Arab women in the ads. Or pick a different place name to pick on.

      Similarly, if they show blacks in Polish ads, then the Poles would likely feel that they are looking at a foreign ad. Something to laugh at, not a product to buy.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    105. Re:Know your market. by Branor · · Score: 1

      So being antisemites and russophobes doesn't count as racist?

    106. Re:Know your market. by MWojcik · · Score: 1
      "We" in this context is the Polish nation and/or government.

      It's quite dishonest to claim that the expulsions were done by the Russians, and Poland had nothing to do with it.

      But they were done by the Soviets. USSR had decided on the new borders and decided that all the Germans have to move to new Eastern Germany country, just as Polish citizens were displaced from lands to the east which were used to form Latvia, Belarus and Ukraine subrepublics of USSR (not independent countries). Poland was shifted to the west by about 50% of its area (i.e. after the war eastern border moved to roughly middle of the pre-war country and western area was moved the same distance). The people from "old" Poland were moved to new "one" - they were as much mistreated as Germans moving to "new" Germany.

    107. Re:Know your market. by binkzz · · Score: 1

      > they may be anti-semites... but racists?

      Seriously?

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    108. Re:Know your market. by binkzz · · Score: 1

      >Though I don't consider it racism, because the hatred isn't towards race or ethnicity

      They are a race: Roma, and they're also an ethnicity.

      --
      'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
    109. Re:Know your market. by GottMitUns · · Score: 1

      There are no Negroes in Poland. And there is no reason to put them in ads. There is no racism in Poland either, since there are no other racial groups. The outsiders that Poles dislike are Germans and Russians.

    110. Re:Know your market. by theanorak · · Score: 1

      Yes. This applies (I suspect) pretty much everywhere outside the US/NA.

      And -- as someone who spends a significant chunk of their time working on this sort of thing and looking for "local diversity" imagery to fit with a variety of places, it's not easy. Or rather, it's not easy and cheap. It's relatively easy to hire some models, a photographer, a studio/location and take great photos with suitable ethnic/gender/age balance for your uses, with the right clothing and in the right setting, and shot in an appropriate way. No, really, it isn't *that* hard.

      It's very expensive though. Many thousands of [valuable currency unit]. And it's extremely time consuming to evaluate photographers, model portfolios, location scout/decide on studio set dressing, find free space in diaries.

      So that's when we turn to the stock photo libraries, and they (for the most part) have *very* limited supplies of non-US focused diversity images.

      --
      === Ask yourself if it's really necessary...
    111. Re:Know your market. by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I'm in Columbus, Ohio, and that photo doesn't look anywhere out of the norm for here. In fact, I would say that I identify with it.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    112. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      But they were done by the Soviets.

      If it was done 100% by the Soviets, then why was there a Polish government organization that was dedicated for these deportations? Why were there Polish guards at the camps?

      USSR had decided on the new borders and decided that all the Germans have to move to new Eastern Germany country

      The borders were decided by USSR and Allied. And Poles were active in the deportations as well. And most of them were deported to West Germany, not East.

      Why don't you just read the link I provided?

      "The attitude of Polish civilians, many of whom had experienced brutalities only surpassed by the treatment of the Jews during the preceding Nazi occupation, was ambiguous.[12] Many engaged in looting, robberies, beatings and even murders and rapes."

      "As early as in 1941, WÅadysÅaw Sikorski of the Polish government in exile insisted on driving "the German horde (...) back far [westward]"[26], while in 1942 memoranda he expressed concern about Poland acquiring Lower Silesia, populated with "fanatically anti-Polish Germans".[27][28] Yet as the war went on, Lower Silesia also became a Polish war aim, as well as occupation of the Baltic coast west of Szczecin as far as Rostock and occupation of the Kiel Canal.[28] Expulsions of Germans from East Prussia and pre-war Poland had become a war aim as early as in February 1940, expressed by Polish Foreign Minister August Zaleski[28]."

      "Soviet troops,[13][14] as well as Polish civilians[12] and militias[59] exacted revenge on ethnic Germans and German nationals. While many Germans had already fled ahead of the advancing Soviet Army, millions of Reichs- and Volksdeutsche remained in East and West Prussia, Silesia, Pomerania, the Sudetenland, and in pockets throughout Central and Eastern Europe.[11] The Polish courier Jan Karski warned US President Franklin Delano Roosevelt of the possibility of Polish reprisals, describing them as "unavoidable" and "an encouragement for all the Germans in Poland to go west, to Germany proper, where they belong"

      "In 1995, Polish foreign minister WÅadysÅaw Bartoszewski expressed regret about the suffering of innocent Germans during the expulsions in a speech held before German parliament and federative council."

      Like I said, it's dishonest to claim that the expulsions were carried out by Soviets, while Poles just stood back and watched. while the border-changes were made with no (or very little) input from the Poles, they could have always offered the Germans in Poland a Polish citizenship or they could have left them where they were. And that's exactly what they did with Germans who were deemed "Indispensable Germans" for the Polish economy.

      What Germany did to Poland and Poles was a lot worse than what Poland and Poles did to Germans. But that still does not justify the claims that "hey, we didn't do anything, it was these other guys who did all the bad things!".

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    113. Re:Know your market. by igny · · Score: 1

      I am going to repeat one more time. NO.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    114. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      1) "German" isn't a "race".

      2) What happened in Germany wasn't some aberration of history, and Hitler wasn't that good a manipulator.

      It's become acceptable to pretend that the German people themselves had no part in what happened during WWII, but they certainly did.

      I'm not saying that all Germans should have been exterminated, but I did feel the need to react to the equivalency that was being made between the expulsion of Germans from Poland and the actual atrocities of WWII. Sorry, but after WWII, I can't really see getting all weepy about the fate of the Germans outside of Germany in Europe.

    115. Re:Know your market. by MWojcik · · Score: 1
      There was no Polish government when the deportations were performed. "Polish" government waselected in elections staged by Soviets and legitimate Polish leaders were kidnapped from UK and sentenced in phony trials or murdered by NKVD.

      "Polish" army was controlled by Red Army generals.

      You make it sound as if Poland was independent country after the war - it wasn't - it was a Soviet puppet country. Likewise, German people couldn't be offered Polish citizenship (even if Polish people would agree, Soviet government wouldn't).

      I'm not saying that Polish people didn't take part in that - many did - I'm saying that it wasn't organized and ordered by Poland.

      And why didn't you quote whole paragraph but omitted last sentence?

      "The attitude of Polish civilians, many of whom had experienced brutalities only surpassed by the treatment of the Jews during the preceding Nazi occupation, was ambiguous.[12] Many engaged in looting, robberies, beatings and even murders and rapes.[12] On the other hand, there were incidents when Poles, even freed slave labourers, protected Germans by e.g. disguising them as Poles.[12]"

    116. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      I have no desire to make excuses for the atrocities that Nazis committed in Poland during WW2. I was merely answering the question regarding expulsion of Germans from Poland, which did happen.

      And it should also be noted that most of the Germans were expelled from areas that used to be part of Germany, not areas that Germany conquered from Poland during the war.

      Also, atrocity is an atrocity. Driving people from their homes through threats (and sometimes more than just threats) of violence is an atrocity that should be condemned. Yes, Poland went through hell and back during the war. Does that make it OK for them to mistreat others in return? Is it OK to mistreat Germans because some other Germans did some shitty things?

      Is it okay to mistreat Germans now? No. Of course not. Anyone born after WWII in Germany has no moral culpability for what happened then. I'm not even saying it should have happened that way. What I'm saying is this: After WWII, anything contemporary Germans got, they had coming to them, in spades, and sounds more like justice, rather than an atrocity.

      After the Holocaust and WWII in general, you could make a decent argument that the German language should only live on in Hell.

      No you could not. Or are you saying that we would be better off today, had Germans been exterminated during and after WW2? To me it seems that modern Germany makes a positive contribution to the World, a contribution that we would lack, had history taken the course you desire. And how exactly would the Allied been one bit better than Nazis were, had they started killing surrendered Germans in their millions?

    117. Re:Know your market. by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      If you ever watched a cheap teen movie that has a story about some group of kids, the group would always have some white kids, one of them being fat, at least one Asian guy and at least one black guy.

      At least for the first few minutes of the movie, until he/they get sacrificed to the crazed killer to save the pretty white girls.

    118. Re:Know your market. by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Well, I can say I was in a meeting the other day with a black guy and an asian woman. And I'm white.

      Trifecta complete!

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    119. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      He's presumably referring to civilians of German ancestry (some of whom had been there a long toime), not the Wermacht & Waffen SS.

      Neither was I referring to the Wermacht or Waffen SS. It's not like the German people bore no responsibility for what happened in WWII. Yes, it sucks for the people who had been there for a long time prior to the war. But it is what it is. After WWII, should anyone be surprised that a country recently invaded by Germany wouldn't want a sizable German population in their borders? It would strike me as the height of idiocy not to make sure you didn't have Germans in your borders. Hitler used German populations in other countries (e.g., Austria) as a pretense for invading them in the first place.

    120. Re:Know your market. by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      You couldn't actually make a very good argument for that. One key takeaway is how it could happen around you.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    121. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Of course it was an atrocity. Surely one that happened at the end of a chain of events that was started by the Germans, but nevertheless. Kicking out millions of people from their homes is an atrocity, as are the conditions under which all that happened. Of course one main person to blame for this would be Stalin, who wanted to shift Poland westward to enhance his "empire". But also blaming him alone would be too easy.

      It was a very fucked up time back then, and nothing can be undone (from any side). But what is really sad are people like you, who more than 60 years later seem to not have learned anything from history about the dangers of racism and nationalism and think that events like the ones described above are OK as long as they happen to people with the right (or should I say "wrong") nationality.

      Given what had just happened, and the fact that a German leader used the presence of Germans within the borders of other countries as a pretext for invading them, if you were the leader of a European country, would you want large numbers of Germans there?

      Incidentally, "German" isn't a race (despite what the Germans of the day might have thought), so I fail to see how being anti-WWII German is "racism".

      To be clear: I don't have a beef with modern Germans or Germany. What I'm saying is that the Germans of the time fucked it up so badly that I think expulsion from their homes -- as harsh as it is by normal standards -- is mild by comparison. In the context of what was going on at the time, I'm not sure the word atrocity fits.

    122. Re:Know your market. by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Since when does an ad have to be believable ?

      They are pretty lies in 99% of cases, entirely made up of fake scientific terms, unrealistic facial expressions and unacheivable real world results. But everybody's worried about a black face in a photo ?

      I thought the internet had put paid to this bollocks.

      I'm also suprised to see a subject this important relegated to Idle.

      Is it acceptable to literally whitewash images of social situations to remove those who don't fit your preconceptions ? Sounds like MiniTrue to me ...

    123. Re:Know your market. by MaerD · · Score: 1

      Forcing diversity is a bad thing. It just causes more problems then simply having a work environment where people don't care what race you are, if you're male/female, and/or if you're straight or not. If you're just trying to do a good job, and work with others to do so, it shouldn't matter.
      Now as to your experience with the differences in British vs American english and an unintentional insult, did you apologize? Did you go "I'm sorry, I was unaware and didn't mean to cause an insult"?
      Or was the case more of "What insult? Why would you be offended by *THAT*? Get a thicker skin, man."
      Attitude tends to be everything when dealing with people across the pond, even when we all are supposedly speaking the same language.

      --
      I put on my robe and wizard hat..
    124. Re:Know your market. by yoyhed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Luckily I use Gmail, sent it to a friend when I saw it, and thus still have it:

      Here.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    125. Re:Know your market. by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Were all three of you smiling at the presentation?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    126. Re:Know your market. by drseuk · · Score: 1

      I think most would stare at a guy 4 inches tall with a 3 footer ...

    127. Re:Know your market. by drseuk · · Score: 1

      There isn't much ethnic diversity, populations are largely heterogeneous.

      You mean homogeneous surely.

    128. Re:Know your market. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I have black hair, and can also relate pretty well to people with red or brown hair.

      Is it possible you were born in a country where lots of people have red or brown hair? That matters a lot. It's not about looking different from someone, it's about looking different from everybody else. I can relate to blacks, Asians and Arabs but I'm sure the fact that I had a few black, Asian and Arab classmates in school helped a lot. Were I to meet someone with blue skin, I might have a bit more trouble relating to them (but I'll have it easier than someone who's never met anyone with a different skin colour in his life).

    129. Re:Know your market. by doug141 · · Score: 1

      Some diversity promoters don't care about the reality of the statistics. I was on a job interview for a fortune 100 company near the east coast. She asked how diverse my old company was. I explained that in rural Minnesota, there wasn't much diversity to work with. She replied that it was therefore the moral responsibility of the company to bus in minorities from the cities 80 miles away!

    130. Re:Know your market. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      If being anti-Semite or a Russophobe isn't "racist", then what is it?

      I don't know about Russophobes, but lately I've been getting the impression that the meaning of antisemite has changed from "someone who hates Jews" to "someone who disagrees with the policies of the government of Israel", which would make antisemitism a political opinion rather than racism.

    131. Re:Know your market. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I don't blame Microsoft for realising the original photo might not be the most effective choice for a particular local market, but making such a stupid ugly hack job out of it is just unforgivable. Proper localised ads are a much more effective, and in the case of a simple photo, shouldn't be too expensive either.

    132. Re:Know your market. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I hate people who invade supermarket car parks, cause a nuisance, steal from people and so on. I'm not particularly fussed whether they are gypsies or some other race.

    133. Re:Know your market. by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I think what GP is saying is that it doesn't matter whether a person is of Romani descent, only that the person begs and steals.

      And the beggars and pickpockets in Europe have a tendency to be Romani.

      I think it's a hatred towards a behavior, not towards a particular ethnic group or culture. The problem is when a particular culture extolls the virtues of the particular behavior in question. Then, it's easy to equate the culture with the behavior. But GP seems to be trying to avoid that particular trap. So I think it's not a case of racism at all.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    134. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I'd say the Aboriginal comment just about sums up my reply. That said, I'll add this: I'm from Atlanta, GA. I'm a white guy who was in the minority going to high school. Ads in metro Atlanta strongly favor African Americans; is that racist? I think not.

    135. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The Romani Gypsies prevalent in eastern Europe are an ethnic group, not a cultural one, so yes it is racism.

      I'm sorry, but if I don't like beggars and thiefs, and virtually every person that I meet or hear about that dresses like a Romani, speaks their language, and lives with their community, either starts begging for money - and then hurling insults and curses at me, like "may you never have children", if I refuse - or tries to pick my or someone else's pocket (children mostly, so you can't even do anything when you catch their hand) - or has a criminal record for theft, robbery and/or drug trafficking - then I guess that people like you will tell me I'm racist. But maybe, you know, there's something about the traditional Romani culture that means that the old folk rule of "Romani = criminal" mostly true - like the fact that crime directed at outsiders is considered virtuous rather than bad in that culture?

      Funny thing is, I'm sure I've met quite a people of Romani descent who weren't any of those things, but then you normally cannot tell they are Romani. That kind of subtle discrimination must be very racist of me, too.

    136. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And they're also a culture, and it's the culture I'm opposed to.

    137. Re:Know your market. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's not like the German people bore no responsibility for what happened in WWII.

      We aren't taking about the German people. We're talking about people of German ancestry living in other countries. What did they do? Did they elect Hitler?

      It would strike me as the height of idiocy not to make sure you didn't have Germans in your borders.

      Then the Americans are idiots, the French are idiots, the Belgians are idiots and so are the British. The latter even have one as their head of state. Windsor my arse, her real surname is Von Hohenstollen Schleswig-Holstein-Pilsner or something like that.

      Hitler used German populations in other countries (e.g., Austria) as a pretense for invading them in the first place.

      The Russians are doing it now. I'd say the fault lies with megalomaniac leaders, not with ordinary people who happen to find themselves on the wrong side of an arbitrary line on a map, but then I'm not a racist crackpot who believes in collective punishment like you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    138. Re:Know your market. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      As did the term "Black guy" and "Nigger" back in the 50's.

      So yes, you are a racist bastard.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    139. Re:Know your market. by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      Please step out of your IT basement and into your marketing department.
      If you are located in Europe, please step out of your insular country for vacation and visit an American or British company.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    140. Re:Know your market. by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Fuck the "PC" way of saying that. I'm a white man, he's a black man. It's like saying I have brown hair. It's simply a fact, it's not a judgment.

    141. Re:Know your market. by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          That 2.7% is just "other", which could be people from anywhere. I'd suspect the black population would be significantly less than 2.7%.

          But, if we assume that the 2.7% are others, that still means that if you have a group of 100 people, you'll have 2 or 3 blacks, and the rest whites. While it could be possible to have a white, black, and asian in a meeting, it's less likely, and therefore the image is more "foreign" as someone else said.

          Your marketing should make it seem that "Oh, they're just like us", so you'll be more prone to buy the products. It's fun to travel around, and pay attention to the differences in marketing materials. Alcohol, cigarette, and vehicle ads are great for it.

          I find vehicle ads more interesting. If you're in a rural area, where farms prevail, you'll find more ads with trucks, frequently showing them moving a heavy load (oohh, my truck is stronger!). As you work your way out from white collar metro areas, you'll spot ads for farm equipment rather. Even looking at vehicle dealerships, while they may have sports cars and economy cars, the lots will have more trucks. Why? Because in a rural farming area, the customers are buying trucks to suit their needs. Some of the ads simply have different models in an almost identical ad, simply because they're tailoring the ad to the demographic. If you're in a predominantly white area of farmers, you'll see white people with trucks. If you're in a predominantly black urban area, it will be targeted to them. It's the same with any group, I'm simply showing a few examples.

          Some places are terribly racial, so having the wrong demographic portrayed in the advertising material have a negative impact. Think about an area like this, where they're selling Brand X beer. If you showed three black people drinking Brand X beer, that would indicate it's a black drink, and sales would drop. In areas where racial boundaries don't exist or aren't clearly defined, you could have racial mix on the signs, and sales would do well.

          Marketing relies heavily on understanding your target market. Back to the original posting, if 97.3% of the people are white, and the majority of decision makers are white, you'd want to focus on them. I'm glad I'm not in marketing. I don't like to see lines based on race or sex. Myself, I see people as people. Still, I'd understand you can't focus on compact car sales in a farming community. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    142. Re:Know your market. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Speaking for myself, as a New Zealander, when I see African-looking people as the carefully-selected diverse-skin-tone group for a posed ad -- as opposed to Pacific Island or Asian, which are the faces we really see here -- it automatically makes me think "American". It's roughly the same effect as having people wearing cowboy hats and speaking in a twang.

      So what you're saying is they should have photoshopped in sheep. Noted for future reference.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    143. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      So, what defines that particular culture?

      Wikipedia has a fairly decent article on that, though it's somewhat whitewashed ("NPOV'd"). There are parts of it that are really not any different from any other culture, like national dress or music - and the parts which are (in my opinion) quite offensive, such as exclusion of, and contempt towards, any outsiders.

      Can anyone become a gypsy by accepting that culture?

      As far as I'm concerned, if you act like one, I'll consider you one; though that's kinda tricky because it's not the behavior of a single individual that defines it; it's the behavior of the community as a whole. A thief is really just a thief - but a child thief who does his job while his mother and sisters distract you by begging and offering to fortune-tell, and who will raise a stink if you catch him with his hand in your pocket, run around trying to spit at you and otherwise make you let go of him, etc - those are gypsies.

      As far as gypsies themselves are concerned, an outsider can become one of them, but that's a fairly hard thing to achieve - probably not any easier than becoming a religious Jew (recognized by the community as such), to give a comparison.

      Is it inherited?

      No, since culture is not "in the blood", obviously. Though if one is raised in a traditional gypsy family for long enough, they will most likely acquire this behavior very early on (gypsy children can be seen begging on the streets alongside their mothers when they're 4-5 years old, and boys start pickpocketing not long after that).

      But young orphans of Roma parents are just kids like any other, and in that sense the fact that people often try to avoid them when looking for a kid to adopt is baseless discrimination.

      Is someone born by a gypsy a gypsy foremost, till they completely denounce their heritage?

      No, someone merely born by a gypsy is of Roma ancestry (well, most likely, since parents might themselves not be Romani in that sense), but not necessarily part of that culture, so there is no heritage to denounce. And I certainly don't believe in "sins of one's fathers".

    144. Re:Know your market. by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Now as to your experience with the differences in British vs American english and an unintentional insult, did you apologize? Did you go "I'm sorry, I was unaware and didn't mean to cause an insult"?

      Something like that, except I did a lot more groveling. I had no intention of causing insult.

    145. Re:Know your market. by danger42 · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Poland (81-93).

      81-93? Is that Poland's record in wars? I thought it was 0-2.

      --
      -nd
    146. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      You mean... anti-Semites aren't racist? And before you start splitting hairs about how Jews aren't a "race", I'd like some scientific evidence for race in the first place.

    147. Re:Know your market. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In Russia, the joke goes like this:

      "I fucking hate racists. And niggers".

      (replace with whatever racial slur suits your fancy and/or audience).

    148. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      No, there's no law. Businesses exploit the atrocious racial history of the US that is prominent in our cultural consciousness, to gain favor through marketing by assuaging that consciousness with imagery of "racial harmony". This plays better in some markets than others, so you're more likely to see it in technology (which is strongest in dense urban populations and where better strides toward equal representation were made in the 70s and 80s) than, say, agriculture.

    149. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. You're saying it's not racist to alter marketing to reflect that "there aren't a heck of a lot of black guys in Poland" (as the argument goes, for "identification with" the characters in the imagery), but clearly they're not removing everything there isn't a lot of in Poland. How many people are going to identify with a Macbook? Race is at the center of the alteration, no matter how you slice it.

    150. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I'm from Atlanta. Advertising there is frequently heavily, heavily biased toward African Americans, who happen to be represent the majority of the population in many parts of the city. That's not racist, either.

    151. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think it is. It's racially motivated stereotyping.

    152. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Then I think you're foolish and misguided. Are you seriously trying to convince the world that certain products and market segments don't appeal more to some races/cultures more than others, or that targeting maketing campaigns at local populations based on demographic norms is racist? If so, you're deluded.

    153. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      1) Nationality is also a part of 'race'

      No, it's not. Race transcends national borders. The Spansih are not a different "race" than the Portuguese. The English aren't a different "race" than the French or Germans. The real genetic divergence (small as it is to begin with) begins when you start looking at Europeans vs. Asians vs. Africans. Then you can start talking about "race" in a meaningful way.

      2) The Expulsion was an atrocity. As was the relocation of poland. As was all the shit that happened during WWII. Saying that, or saying one of them was, without mentioning the other, makes the other nothing less than that.

      Not everything that happened during WWII was an atrocity. The problem is that equating these events makes them both less meaningful. I don't really comprehend how one could equate them and say they both have to be brought to the same level. I'd much rather be forced to move than exterminated outright, wouldn't you?

      3) Do you know which one where sympathizers and which weren't? Which had active roles and which didn't? Saying all Germans deserved everything, what could have been done to them, is as racist as you could get.

      First, active vs. passive acceptance of Hitler is a fairly meaningless distinction. He was elected and kept in power precisely because he had the support of the majority of Germans, without which he couldn't have done what he did. Was there a German resistance? Sure. But not one that survived the war. Hitler's response to the July 20th plot assured that. And the failure of the July 20th plot itself demonstrates the support Hitler had.

      German Guy: [after getting swallowed by Blob-Homer] What did we Germans ever do to deserve this?
      [gets an angry look from his friend]
      German Guy: Oh, right.

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0831240/quotes

      4) The GGGP, you where answering to, gave a specific example of poles driving a group out. Nothing more, nothing less. Your "But they deserved it!" was completely offtopic Your "And they could all have been killed instead" even worse.

      What I actually said was, "After the shit the Germans pulled, they were lucky they were allowed to live -- period." It was an acknowledgement of reality and of human nature, not a statment of what they "deserved". There are many conditions under which one might say, "Wow! You were lucky you weren't killed!", without actually wishing that on the person. Why? Because one could reasonably make an argument for the elimination of Germany as a nation (i.e., without "East" or "West", and for mass executions of Nazi supporters (which was not without Allied support)). And let's not forget: Obliterating one's vanquished foes is exactly how this kind of thing was handled in days gone by. And even how it was handled by the Germans themselves, on a regional level. (How do you think Britain would've fared, if Germany's invasion was successful?)

      Again, in the grand scheme of things, expelling people from a region is a far cry from the kinds of atrocities perpetrated by the Germans. I will say that there's never a justification of the rape of women. But insofar as the expulsion itself? Not really either a surprise or an atrocity, as far as I can tell.

    154. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      So, like, watermelon and fried chicken? What?

      Race doesn't exist, friend.

    155. Re:Know your market. by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Do you scrutinize every ad that you see? Do you even give it a second of your time? I certainly don't. Particularly when it says 'Microsoft' (but that is another story).

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    156. Re:Know your market. by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      No these are the Romani people, they look like they could be Indian and not in any way European. I haven't heard of any Irish Travelers in my area.

    157. Re:Know your market. by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Meh. I'm Canadian. :P I think most people understood.

    158. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Race doesn't exist, friend.

      That's a hilarious statement. Different cultures have different preferences for a wide variety of things. These preferences are frequently broken down clearly across ethnic and racial lines. Growing up in a diverse environment, I can appreciate these differences, and enjoy experiencing what different cultures have to offer. Have you been living under a rock, or are you attempting to enforce some kind of personal fantasy where everyone's a clone?

    159. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Note that I didn't say that cultures don't exist. Race is not culture. Race is a set of arbitrary and constantly shifting guidelines of membership based on pseudoscience and imperial tradition.

      When the "white race" was invented, the Irish, Spanish, Italians and Slavs were not "white". Neither, in fact, were any Africans "black"â"they were hundreds of nations and further categorized into dozens of colonies. Asians were "Mongolians". Race does not exist, it's a social construct and a harmful one at that.

      Now, again, when you're talking about cultural preferences of black Atlantans, what exactly are the preferences you're referring to?

      Note that the issue that prompted this is the premise that, apparently, Polish people "culturally prefer" people who are not black. That was the cultural targeting in the ad in question.

    160. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Most of the Germans we are talking about here were living within the German borders before the war. Two of the largest criminals of the 20th century (Hitler and Stalin) teamed up to divide Poland amongst Germany and the Soviet Union. Since the Soviet Union won the war, they got to keep (mostly) their part of the deal. Instead (and to get rid of the Polish population living there) Poland got new territory from Germany. This is why suddenly so many Germans lived "within the borders of other countries". Yes, I know there are other cases, like the Germans living in Czechoslovakia...

      I'll agree that Stalin, in a perfect (or even better than average) world wouldn't have gotten as much out of the deal at Potsdam as he did. However, on balance, the Cold War between the U.S. and then-Soviet Union was a better result for the world than a Cold War between the Third Reich and the Soviet Union, which would have left many more dead in its wake than WWII eventually did (e.g., finishing off the Jews entirely, to start with). I simply don't see how the Allies could have taken on Hitler entirely alone. It was the suicidal mission against Russia that eventually led to the German defeat.

      Me neither. This is why I wrote about the dangers of racism *and* nationalism. Both of which played a big role in WWII. I also have no problem with being anti-Nazi-Germany. But one should not forget that people have their nationality rather independently from the current politics of their country.

      Under most circumstances, I'd buy that, except for the fact that the Nazi party had absolutely no subtlety concerning its goals during its rise to power. This isn't a case where people were duped by a deceptive smooth talker. They were who would be persecuted, and those groups were persecuted. The 25 Points don't mention executions for Jews explicitly, but check out #18, keeping in mind all the new restrictions the 25 Points lay out for Jews:

      18. We demand struggle without consideration against those whose activity is injurious to the general interest. Common national criminals, usurers, Schieber and so forth are to be punished with death, without consideration of confession or race.

      It's not the worst thing that happened. And it clearly can only be judged in the historic context. But even then, it is something that should not have happened. A large scale annexation and expulsion of millions of people is a crime. And, in the grand scheme of things, we are not talking about some spontaneous actions by people traumatized by suffering from the German invasion and occupation. We are talking about an operation planned and orchestrated by politicians/leaders, most of all Stalin, who also used other opportunities to prove that his valuation of human life and dignity was not much further developed than that of the Nazis.

      Clearly, Stalin rates right up there with Hitler as one of the 20th century's greatest scumbags. No argument there. And I won't defend the behavior of the Soviet army. But do you really see a rational way for this to have gone down other than the German expulsion from areas outside of what became Germany after the war? Again, how safe could one possibly feel with a large German population in one's borders, given what had just gone on? Does that mean I support wholesale slaughter? No. But the simple movement (coerced or not) of Germans to within Germany's new borders (again, leaving aside the activities of the Soviet army against the populace) barely rates a mention when compared to the acts of inhumanity committed during that war.

    161. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      You've devolved to simply playing semantics. I'm beginning to strongly suspect you're trolling, and I'm also beginning to wonder about your level of education.

    162. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      I'm not playing semantics. I'm explaining what I meant.

      And I'm explaining why "catering to racial preference" in the form of removing black people from photos cannot be construed as anything other than racist. Again, if your assertion is that the "cultural preference" of Poles is a lack of black people, how is that anything other than racist?

      But continue to attack my person (as you perceive it) rather than my comments. It makes you sound confident in your line of reasoning.

    163. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      It's not that the cultural preference is for a lack of black people. It's the fact that there is a distinct lack of black people in Poland. Whether you like it or not, people instinctively make associations (or don't) based on this thing that you refuse to acknowledge the existence of: race.

      I'm not advocating discriminating against an individual on the basis of race. I'm merely pointing out the obvious fact that it people from a particular culture will not automatically identify with someone from another culture in the same manner as they would with someone from their locale. That's not racism, it's basic human behavior.

    164. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Though, my impression is that, pragmatically speaking, it's one and the same: if you're against Israel-as-a-state's policy, then you're more-or-less against the existence of Israel and a Jewish people at all. The last 30 years have made it pretty clear that their Arab/Muslim neighbors are dead-set against their existence - culturally, religiously, ethnically, and so on.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    165. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      How about this. Since you're making the assertion, why don't you provide evidence? Show me some evidence that by and large Poles don't identify with black people.

    166. Re:Know your market. by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

      Then take another picture instead of crudely photoshopping this one.

    167. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Actually, I probably shouldn't have posted; I was getting pretty tired. My point was lost: I did make that quote reference in the sense that it was originally intended: you've got to get together and work together, but work together realizing that there are differences which require said fence in the first place. That's why the fences were there: keep the outside, out.

      The final sentence of that post was in reference to the excessive "cultural mandate" of ethno-diversity which has, frankly, not worked out so well with the degree of excess we have tackled it.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    168. Re:Know your market. by shirotakaaki · · Score: 1

      I would also stare at a guy that was 4 inches at 3 feet.

    169. Re:Know your market. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Actually, the skin color would be closer to a "white Mexican" (as opposed to a native-skinned Mexican): a blending of the 30% of blacks, increasing South American population, and existing white populations. It'll probably be more "brown-black" than "white" - white people aren't reproducing much anymore.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    170. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      We aren't taking about the German people. We're talking about people of German ancestry living in other countries. What did they do? Did they elect Hitler?

      We are talking about Germans living inside of Germany. Or did I miss the part where Poland, Czechoslovakia, and Austria invaded themselves? The issue isn't that the Germans in the other countries did anything (other than offer no support to their adopted countries when they were being invaded). The issue is the motivation this gave Germans living inside Germany to claim that territory. That's what moving Germans into (post-WWII) German territory was supposed to prevent.

      It would strike me as the height of idiocy not to make sure you didn't have Germans in your borders.

      Then the Americans are idiots, the French are idiots, the Belgians are idiots and so are the British. The latter even have one as their head of state. Windsor my arse, her real surname is Von Hohenstollen Schleswig-Holstein-Pilsner or something like that.

      You have noticed the passage of 60 some-odd years, as well as the strong anti-Nazi laws now in place in Germany, haven't you? Not to mention the whole breakup-unification cycle that's gone on since then? Back when the relocation of the German refugees was taking place, none of that was in existence. You had anti-Nazi sentiment, naturally enough, but it was nothing like it is today, where "Nazi" and "evil" are essentially synonymous. That took the full uncovering of the Holocaust and the publicity of the Neuremberg trials to accomplish. You might also take notice of the fact that the Allied powers involved all looked at German reunification as a something fraught with danger for Europe and the rest of the world.

      Oh, and about the queen of Great Britain? Her German ancestry goes back hundreds of years. The Queen Mother actually was intensely anti-Nazi during the war.

      The Russians are doing it now. I'd say the fault lies with megalomaniac leaders, not with ordinary people who happen to find themselves on the wrong side of an arbitrary line on a map, but then I'm not a racist crackpot who believes in collective punishment like you.

      Three points:

      1) Who enables these leaders to do what they do?

      2) Again, "German" isn't a race, so even if I was against all Germans (which I'm not), "racism" wouldn't apply here.

      3) While the results of the movement were disastrous for the people involved, the expulsions were not "collective punishment" in any real sense. Germans were moved back into Germany (albeit, into the new borders) to avoid a repeat of what had happened before. Poland, in particular, had been fighting "Germany" (in one form or another) centuries before there even was a unified Germany. Making sure the Germans stayed in Germany was meant to prevent the kind of bloodshed that having such ethnic pockets in other countries promoted.

    171. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      The evidence, once again, is basic human behavior. If I were to use Caucasians for advertisements in Kinshasa, do you honestly expect anyone to believe they'd be as effective as a campaign targeted at local demographics? If you do believe this, I'm sorry to say your views and reality branched somewhere, and there's very little I can do to help you. Would you call the locals there racist? I sure wouldn't.

    172. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I fully agree that the photoshopping was an amateurish mistake. The individual responsible for assembling the ad copy should have simply used another image.

    173. Re:Know your market. by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I agree with the first part of what you said. I don't honestly understand what you were saying in the second half. But to your original point: yes, if that's racist then all those McDonald's billboards on the Chicago southside that feature blacks and all those TV court show billboards that feature blacks and hispanics, must be racist as well. There aren't many blacks in Eastern Europe, but there are some, mostly of recent African origin. There are blacks in Germany too. I think that surprises many Americans. Poland really has a better record on white-black relations than say Russia. In Poland, there's most russophobia. If the switch was intentionally race-based, which it's not necessarily, then if anything, Microsoft is guilty of underestimating Polish attitudes.

    174. Re:Know your market. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Nervous sheep with their butts up against the wall.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    175. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      So are you going to post evidence, or just keep repeating the assertion?

    176. Re:Know your market. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      I did, about two hours ago, in reply to your previous request. Did you miss it somehow?

    177. Re:Know your market. by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Can you point me to it? I must have missed it.

    178. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      There was no Polish government when the deportations were performed.

      So when did Poland get a proper government? The government that ruled Poland for decades after WW" was a continuation of that government.

      Why do I get the idea that whatever bad things was done in Poland after WW2, Poles had no responsibility for it? Even if the people doing them were Poles?

      Likewise, German people couldn't be offered Polish citizenship (even if Polish people would agree, Soviet government wouldn't).

      "While most of the ethnic German population of pre-war Poland fled or was expelled, some were "rehabilitated" and offered their pre-war Polish citizenship back.[94] "Rehabilitation" was offered to people who had been subject to forced labour before, spoke Polish and were rated as not constituting a threat"

      So some Germans were given Polish citizenship.

      I'm not saying that Polish people didn't take part in that - many did - I'm saying that it wasn't organized and ordered by Poland.

      A country called "Poland" existed back then, and it had a working government, and that government took part in deportations. Hell, even the Polish government in exile had spoken in favour of deportations earlier!

      If you say that it doesn't count, because Poland back then was influenced by the Soviets, then you could conveniently brush aside any of the possible bad things that happened during communist era and say "there was no independent Poland, Poland regained their independence when USSR fell".

      And why didn't you quote whole paragraph but omitted last sentence?

      Because I was quoting the part that supported my point? The fact that many Poles helped Germans after WW2 does not change the fact that many Poles abused Germans after the war.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    179. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Is it okay to mistreat Germans now? No. Of course not.

      But had things went the way you wanted them to go, there would be no Germans today.

      Anyone born after WWII in Germany has no moral culpability for what happened then. I'm not even saying it should have happened that way. What I'm saying is this: After WWII, anything contemporary Germans got, they had coming to them, in spades, and sounds more like justice, rather than an atrocity.

      So, guilt by association? Are all Americans therefore responsible for what happened during Bush Administration? Or does that privilege only extend to WW2-era Germans? Also, if all Germans were guilty, does that mean that people like Von Stauffenberg are guilty as well? How about Erwin Rommel?

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    180. Re:Know your market. by MWojcik · · Score: 1

      So when did Poland get a proper government? The government that ruled Poland for decades after WW" was a continuation of that government

      .

      In 1991, when there were first democratic elections. Before that were elections in 1989, but the communists were guaranteed 65% of places in the parliament at that time

      "While most of the ethnic German population of pre-war Poland fled or was expelled, some were "rehabilitated" and offered their pre-war Polish citizenship back.[94] "Rehabilitation" was offered to people who had been subject to forced labour before, spoke Polish and were rated as not constituting a threat"

      So some Germans were given Polish citizenship

      Yes, after Poland regained independence and was no longer a Soviet satellite country. And could decide for itself.

      If you say that it doesn't count, because Poland back then was influenced by the Soviets, then you could conveniently brush aside any of the possible bad things that happened during communist era and say "there was no independent Poland, Poland regained their independence when USSR fell".

      Poland wasn't "influenced" by Soviets - it was ruled by Soviets. Officials (including "president" - the title was different) were appointed by Soviets. Polish government have to get approval for virtually anything from Soviet communist party and had to perform whatever they requested. There were Soviet military bases in Poland till 90s. So I'm not going to brush away "any" possible bad thing (there were, and still are, strong anti-Jew sentiments for example), but things ordered by the government (so in fact by Soviet communist party) hell yeah.

      Because I was quoting the part that supported my point? The fact that many Poles helped Germans after WW2 does not change the fact that many Poles abused Germans after the war.

      Good, you can admit we weren't only bad guys ;)

    181. Re:Know your market. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Though, my impression is that, pragmatically speaking, it's one and the same: if you're against Israel-as-a-state's policy, then you're more-or-less against the existence of Israel and a Jewish people at all.

      No, that's the whole point. Being against the policies of a government is not the same as being against the existence of a country. Do you think the people who are against Obama are against the US? Do you think the people who were against Bush were against the US? You can disagree with the policies of a government without being against the existence of a state.

      But even if you are against the existence of a state, that doesn't have to mean that you're against an ethnic group, some of which happen to live in that state. There are Jews who don't think the state of Israel was a very good idea. Are they antisemites?

      And that's before even mentioning the fact that Arabs are also a Semitic people.

      There's a huge, huge gap between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. But anti-Zionism doesn't sound quite as evil as enti-Semitism, so Zionists are stealing that word to make their political opponents look bad. But that's changing the meaning of a word into something completely different from the original meaning.

      The last 30 years have made it pretty clear that their Arab/Muslim neighbors are dead-set against their existence - culturally, religiously, ethnically, and so on.

      Some of them, certainly. A very vocal and militant minority. But many Arabs couldn't care less, as long as Israel didn't oppress some Arabs so much. There are certainly a lot of Palestinians who just want peace.

    182. Re:Know your market. by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      p>In 1991, when there were first democratic elections. Before that were elections in 1989, but the communists were guaranteed 65% of places in the parliament at that time

      So by that logic, Poland and/or Poles could not be accused of anything that took place between 1940 - 1989?

      Yes, after Poland regained independence and was no longer a Soviet satellite country. And could decide for itself.

      And when did that happen?

      Poland wasn't "influenced" by Soviets - it was ruled by Soviets.

      So all the bad things that Poland and/or Poles did during that time does not count? If some Pole raped a German (for example), it does not count because "the country was ruled by the Soviets"? If Government of Poland drove Germans out of the country, it does not count, since it was in reality done by the Soviets?

      I'm sorry, but I don't buy that. Poland can't just wash their hands on this thing, and blame everything on Soviets.

      Good, you can admit we weren't only bad guys ;)

      Compared to Nazi-Germany, post-WW2 Poland was paradise on Earth. But that doesn't change the fact that some bad things happened in Poland, and many of those bad things were done by the Polish Government and Poles.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    183. Re:Know your market. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Is it okay to mistreat Germans now? No. Of course not.

      But had things went the way you wanted them to go, there would be no Germans today.

      I didn't say that. Allow me to clarify: After what happened, anything that happened to them, they had coming. I don't support the Soviet army's abuse of the German women (rapes, etc.), but the mere movement of Germans to areas inside Germany? Yeah, I think that was only prudent. The logistical problems associated with it were terrible, of course, but that was not intentional, as far as I can tell, and there needs to be some degree of volition to call it an atrocity.

      So, guilt by association? Are all Americans therefore responsible for what happened during Bush Administration? Or does that privilege only extend to WW2-era Germans? Also, if all Germans were guilty, does that mean that people like Von Stauffenberg are guilty as well? How about Erwin Rommel?

      I figured that question was coming. Glad you asked.

      The easiest case to answer is Stauffenberg. He recognized what Hitler's regime was, and tried to put a stop to it. Did he do it belatedly? Of course. But the fact of the matter is, the man did have a conscience, and eventually paid with his life for it. Seems to me a pretty clear case of a person doing their penance.

      The same could be said of Rommel. While he participated in the war, he refused to commmit war crimes, and actively opposed Hitler when he saw who Hitler was.

      I don't think either Rommel or Stauffenberg can be completely absolved of their involvement in Hitler's regime, simply because they knew what the Nazi party was about better than most. However, unlike the vast majority of their countrymen (inside and outside of the military) they stood up to it. In addition, they understood what honor in the military service meant, which was one of the reasons they opposed Hitler, in the end. They weren't just mindless drones going along to get along. And in the end, they paid for their support of Hitler with their lives, so their culpability was paid for, to the extent it could be.

      Now, on to the United States under the Bush administration.

      Anything that Bush said he was going to do during the election, anyone who voted for him is responsible for. (If you didn't vote for him, then you're not culpable, but I would suggest you should look at the election results from the 1933 German election. While the NSDP didn't get a majority, no hanging chads came into play. The support of the German National People's Party put them over the top.) If he didn't say he was going to do it, anyone who voted for him can't be held responsible for those actions directly. (They're responsible in the sense that they did vote for him, of course, but it's not the same kind of direct moral responsibility as if you knew what he was going to do.) So, in certain respects, it's not a black-and-white thing, because in the case of Bush, there was some amount of "playing to the middle" involved, where an American politician doesn't usually shout it from the rooftops if his positions would be conisdered far-left or far-right.

      Hitler's NSDP party had no such subtlety. If you were paying any kind of attention at all to their platform and their 25 points, you knew what you were in for, in broad form, when you voted for him. The 25 points of the NSDP party basically called Jews enemies of the state, declared it illegal for Jews to engaged in many activities, and declared that the penalty for crimes should be death. They didn't directly call for the death of the Jews, but all the dots were connected, if you read their platform. So voting for Hitler was quite a different thing for voting for any modern president. In order to make a comparison to Americna history, you'd probably have to compare it to voting for John C. Breckenridge in the election of 1860.

  4. romney? by s4m7 · · Score: 1

    they already fixed it. BORING!

    Is the white guy they shopped in a lookalike for mitt romney or is that my imagination?

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:romney? by bendodge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Notice that they fixed it so hastily they forgot to extend the orange bar for the text like they did the first time around.

      --
      The government can't save you.
  5. Simple answer perhaps? by tx_kanuck · · Score: 1

    Maybe they just didn't have distribution rights for that models images outside of North America? Always possible that is what happened, and it didn't get caught until late enough that it was cheaper to photoshop then reshoot.

    I know, I know, how dare I give them benefit of the doubt.

    --
    Now, if that makes sense to anyone, could you please explain it to me? I think I've confused myself.
    1. Re:Simple answer perhaps? by jedrek · · Score: 1

      This is obviously stock - the apple is photoshopped off the macbook. There is no way they don't have world-wide rights to each models' likeness.

  6. I would have put a 14" dong on him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're going to doctor it, at least have some fun with it....

    1. Re:I would have put a 14" dong on him. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      If you're going to doctor it, at least have some fun with it....

      I think someone had a little fun placing a white MacBook in a Microsoft add...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:I would have put a 14" dong on him. by flyingfsck · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should at least have turned the Macbook black to compensate.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  7. Who else was epecting by Techman83 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That the guy had actually been "photo shopped" white, rather then just a different person!

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i cat
    Damn, my RAM is full of cats. MEOW!!
    1. Re:Who else was epecting by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1
      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:Who else was epecting by BryanL · · Score: 1

      Yeah. The headline should have said something more like "Microsoft Poland Photoshops Black Guy for White One" or "Microsoft Replaces Black Man for a White Man in Polish Ad Image."

        But This is Slashdot. What do you expect. I hear that someday they are going to have editors to proofread story submissions and headlines.

  8. 50th Anniversary of Black Like Me by theodp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe it's Microsoft's way of celebrating the 50th anniversary of the writing of Black Like Me.

    1. Re:50th Anniversary of Black Like Me by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hell, I thought Bill Clinton wrote that book. (How many people are awrare that Clinton was a mutant? He combined all of the white man's worst traits with all of the black man's worst traits, with a few of women's worst traits spliced in to make him everybody's bitch.)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    2. Re:50th Anniversary of Black Like Me by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I take offense to this, I don't see anywhere that Clinton is once, twice, three times a lady.

  9. This happens all the time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://photoshopdisasters.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:This happens all the time... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that... I will now have one more not-work thing to do at work tomorrow. :)

    2. Re:This happens all the time... by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Every week I see a white guy photoshoped out and replaced by a black/asian guy to meet "diversity standards" and the ONE TIME they do it the other way around, kdawson has a bird! I honestly believe that the only part of the internet that kdawson actually SEES are the articles people submit to him....

  10. Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They changed a black guy into a white guy, but they used cropping.
    A black man took a gun to an anti-Obamacare rally. MSNBC showed his picture, or at least a picture of his shirt and gun (no hands or head), claimed it was a white guy and that he was motivated by racism.

    Link here: Instapundit and Afterburner video

    1. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by pcolaman · · Score: 1

      Chris Matthews, is that you?

    2. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Pretty cool. The guy has a good point against msnbc but honestly he is kinda insane. He turns from informative to cultist over ten minutes. He kinda fucks up his argument towards the end. He was arguing that the best gets picked on, fine thats human nature. When you improve something it is natural to look for further improvements. But then he links that (us having a black president) to healthcare. But that is completely COMPLETELY untrue. He implies that like having a black president the US is in the forefront of the world the US is in the forefront of healthcare. The US healthcare system is insanely innefficient, it is the most expensive system on the planet and ranks somewhere in the late 30s for effectiveness. That isn't people picking on the best, the US is just woefully behind. (Oh and on the issue of women in power, the US is in 67th place for % of parliament that are women.) Minorities in power is harder to determine statistics on but... The pm of Peru is japanese, Bolivia had a recent pm from an ethnic minority, Disraeli in England (a while ago but still...). I dunno why i put research into debunking some video an AC posted :/

    3. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by metalhed77 · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm pretty sure I saw the clip you were talking about. There were 2 guys with guns at the rally, one white, one black. During the newscast something got messed up, the reporter was talking about the white guy while pre-recorded footage of the black guy was playing. The reporter pointed this out while this happened, admitting to the screw up. I don't think anything intentionally disingenuous was going on, just a garden variety fuckup.

      --
      Photos.
    4. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by twostix · · Score: 1, Informative

      Erm the clip is in that link and is exactly as the GP describes and not even one iota as you describe.

      There's no fuck up there and may I say after seeing it *holy shit* that's not even mere "bias", that's even beyond Fox news style "editing".

      It's carefully edited to appear fully as though it's a white man carrying the gun, very cynically too I might add as it sticks out like a sore thumb and even though I was pre-warned my first thought was that it *was* the white guy whose face was cut to immediately after the loooong close up of the armed individual (so close you couldn't see any skin). Until I saw the edited out extra footage where the camera zooms out on the armed individual and you can see it's some big black dude. MSNBC cut away to the white guys face just before it zoomed out and at the same time the pundits are ranting about the evil white men turning up at these "town hall" meetings armed becasue there's a black president and in your mind the association is made, it's the white guy that has the gun.

      It's sick! How can you people stand for that from your media??

      Oh and how dishonest can YOU be by the way? Nice attempt at a whitewash, keep muddying those waters of truth...and keep telling yourself that you're better than the "right" and that those sorts of tactics (that I'm sure you used to rail against when Bush did it) are ok because your sides cause is "just".

      You're a shill.

    5. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by superyooser · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That video is awesome! Bill Whittle flashes the light of truth on the latest contemptuous dishonesty of the liberal media and educates on the conflict-mongering, anti-America roots of the American Left. It should be required viewing for every American.

    6. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Brianwa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm pretty sure they do that sort of stuff all the time. Earlier this year there was a small scandal regarding a teacher at a local school. The school resource officer involved apparently would not give comments that the news stations wanted, so they got a recording of a *different* police officer and played it while displaying a candid telephoto shot of the first guy. The newspapers also quoted the wrong officer and suggested that they were quoting the correct person.

    7. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Brownstar · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.azcentral.com/members/Blog/WATCHBLOG/60115

      Is a story about the white guy with the gun in question.

    8. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1, Informative

      He started out fucking up his argument from the minute he opened his mouth. He compared Rodney King - who was severely beaten by COPS to Gladney who was beaten by a couple of random union shitheads. The first was a severe abuse of authority, the second was a couple of assholes assaulting a guy. And while it sucks shit to get assaulted, to be assaulted by the police is a crime against all citizens.

      Plus, as another person posted links to information about - there really was a white racist with a big gun strapped to his hip at that rally. The editors were just sloppy, probably didn't have footage of the white guy so they improvised. Stupid and sloppy, but not some vast left-wing conspiracy.

      Personally, I don't see a big deal about the gun stories at all. More people ought to bring their guns because rights are meaningless unless you exercise them. Plus, it isn't like they are anywhere near the president - wherever he goes is automatically federal land and neither concealed nor open-carry is permitted there.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Fuck! Why did you have to post that?
      Damn truth with its liberal bias!
      You just ruined a great conspiracy theory. They had video and everything.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by twostix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Conspiracy theory, what the hell are you talking about?

      There's extended *MSNBC* video footage of a black guy holding a semi automatic assault rifle at an anti-"Obama Care" rally.

      The pundits on MSNBC were talking about the crazy racist WHITE people turning up at these events armed when there was a BLACK GUY ON SCREEN ARMED TO THE TEETH. The on site reporter even interviewed him! All of which they conveniently cut when they wanted to rant about the crazy white rednecks.

      Watch the goddamned video you ignorant shill, then pull your head out of your knee jerk reactionary arse and realise that "your guys" media outlets are behaving just as badly as the media outlet of guys that just got kicked out.

      I *really* hated the dishonesty, lies and absolute bullshit that the right pushed onto the world for 8 years and hoped (stupidly it would seem) that the left would be a little better. Boy was I wrong, dishonest AND hypocrites.

      Fuck sake...

    11. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by twostix · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm no.

      Did you even watch the video?? Apparently not.

      The "gun in question" is an AR-15 assault rifle held by a black guy that was interviewed by the onsite MSNBC reporter at an anti-"obamacare" town hall meeting. The fact that he was black and the interview was conveniently cut by MSNBC when they were showing footage of his gun and ranting on about the evil racist white rednecks that want to kill the black president.

      The link you have (bizarrely) supplied is a completely separate event in another part of the country weeks ago.

      Why the fuck are you modded up your post doesn't even make sense! It's not *that hard* to watch 5 minutes of video.

      Intellectual dishonesty is a far worse crime than uneducated ignorance.

    12. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by twostix · · Score: 1

      "Improvised"

      Pretty convenient "improvisation" that just happened to suit the pundits that were ranting and raving as the footage was shown about racist WHITE people taking guns to these events because the president is black...while displaying an assault rifle being held by a *black* guy who had also been interviewed by their own reporter but the fact that he was black conveniently "improvised" out.

      I wonder if you were so forgiving when Fox and the right were trying to pull the exact same sort of "sloppy editing" during the last eight years.

    13. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Woooosh!

      What part of "there really was a white guy with a gun there" do you not understand?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The pundits on MSNBC were talking about the crazy racist WHITE people turning up at these events armed when there was a BLACK GUY ON SCREEN ARMED TO THE TEETH. The on site reporter even interviewed him! All of which they conveniently cut when they wanted to rant about the crazy white rednecks.

      Answer this question, yes or no. Do you understand that there was also a white guy there who was also armed to the teeth and was an avowed member of a racist organization? YES or NO.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    15. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Then you must be talking about different things. I saw the news. Thre were two people at rallies with guns.

      In this case, it seem like it was jsut a screw up. Both events are unusually, and similiar.

      This is clearly a screw up, nothing more.

      But you go aheade and make a mountain out of nothing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Um, the people talking probably never saw the original footage, and the footage ion screen didn't show any indicators of race.

      Watch it again.

      It's a screw up. I suspect they where going to show the image of the white guy thatm showed uop and eduting goofed.

      Why lie about this when there was a white guy with a gun at a rally?
      This isn't malice, it incompetence.

      What's far worse is how they go on and on about how angry we all are supposed to be, apparently. Also on how soneone is going to try a kill the president.

      All they are doing is fanning a few embers into become flames.

      I am not giving them a pass, but looking at the footage and the fact footage was available of a white guy with a gun that they could of used I really think this is a mistake.

      here is the footage I am talking about:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYKQJ4-N7LI&feature=player_embedded

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Just like MSNBC: changing black people to white by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That's a total exaggeration. There is a lot of noise out there about this happening, but I have to wonder if it's all originating from dishonest brokers who watched no more than a minute of MSNBC coverage. I was watching MSNBC when they showed the guy. I saw his face, I noted he was black myself, and I watched the many news segments that followed in the days after where MSNBC discussed the subject and used his video appearance as B roll. He's become a poster boy on that network. Incidentally, he wasn't just there. "Chris B." as he went by was there as part of a publicity stunt staged by Ernie Hancock, a Libertarian blogger and long-time associate of the Arizona Black Viper militia, a group that attempted to bomb federal buildings in the '90s. I wouldn't be surprised if "Chris B" was a member of Black Viper himself.

      Incidentally, I love the photoshop image of Christ holding an assault rifle. I'm pro gun myself, but how disconnected with reality and ignorant of history do you have to be to think Christ would have carried a gun if he could?

  11. How offensive by sheehaje · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find this very rude and discriminatory. How do we know this guy wasn't Gimped?

    1. Re:How offensive by z0idberg · · Score: 1

      Looks more like it was an MS Paint job to me.

  12. Can't really bitch except for the quality by smchris · · Score: 1

    And the racial overtones. When I was asked whether I could "do something" on a job, I've cut out the middle man of a standing trio because that was the image they wanted from that event so they could write about it. Would like to think I did a better job, and I've always figured I wasn't the first and only person doing it. Photographs just aren't a reliable chronicle of events anymore. At least not at a naive glance.

  13. He doesn't even look black by _merlin · · Score: 1

    Let's assume for a moment that the darker guy is, in fact, the original, and that he wasn't shopped in for political correctness in the American market. The guy doesn't even look "black" to me - "black" meaning African for the most part. He looks more like someone of south Asian descent (India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.).

    1. Re:He doesn't even look black by mortonda · · Score: 1

      Well, if he wasn't the original, then they remembered to shop the hand in the first but not the second... talk about mixed race.... lol

  14. Sorry MJ, It DOES Matter If You're Black or White by theodp · · Score: 1

    If you want to be my(crosoft's) baby, it DOES matter if you're Black or White. :-)

  15. That's nothing... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    You should see the real original picture before MS photoshopped in those two non-Busey guys.

    (Yes, stolen from reddit.)

    --
    [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    1. Re:That's nothing... by _Shorty-dammit · · Score: 1

      ok, I don't know why, but that cracked me up pretty good. hahaha

  16. Saving a few bucks by quarterbuck · · Score: 1

    May be they were trying to save a few bucks and cheaply localizing the picture? Can't find anything racist in it.
    Anyway, they have now changed it back which is actually funny. There are only about 4,500 African people in Poland whom wiki funnily enough calls African Americans . Reading the wiki text seems to indicate that 4,500 is indeed the total Black people count in Poland and not African Americans.

    --
    http://slashdot.org/submission/1062723/Cheap-mobile-data-plan?art_pos=2
    1. Re:Saving a few bucks by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      There are only about 4,500 African people in Poland whom wiki funnily enough calls African Americans.

      Maybe because African-Pollocks would be more offensive?

    2. Re:Saving a few bucks by blazer1024 · · Score: 1

      If they changed it back... how do we know it wasn't a defacement hack intended to get some cheap laughs at the idea that Microsoft is racist in Poland?

      I mean, that photoshop was bad enough that I could expect it from a 14 year old script kiddie... but not even the most rushed "pro" job.

    3. Re:Saving a few bucks by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I took the liberty of editing the wikipedia - and signed it while doing so. Some moron obviously thinks that African American applies to anyone and everyone who isn't white. I notice the lack of citations for statements in the article. Duhhhh

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  17. Nothing new by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    I watched George Pal's "When World Collide" as well as a bunch of other movies ("War of the Worlds", "The Time Machine") from the 1950's. It is funny how the world (now and in the future) is inhabited only by beautiful white women blonds and while Anglo Saxon men.

  18. They broke the ethnic spread! by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

    They had the obligatory white woman, the Asian man, and the black man in the original photo. Now you have a white woman, a white man, and an Asian man. The ethnicity is unbalanced! How will we know they treat all people equally? How will we feel safe in a world where we can't see diversity?!?! Real diversity comes from the colour of your skin, dammit!

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  19. What about the Asian guy? by bahamlabs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If they Photoshopped in a white guy over the black guy, what about the Asian guy? I mean, how likely are you to see a Korean guy walking the streets of Poland? ( Or maybe I just don't know the streets of Poland).

    --
    --Bahamlabs
    1. Re:What about the Asian guy? by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Is probably much more likely to see an Asian guy in a foreign firm in Poland... let's say Samsung, LG, Honda, Toshiba, Mitsubishi, etc ... don't know off-hand of any African company that might invests in Poland. As for American companies I would guess that that the percentage of blacks sent oversees is probably lower than the percentage of blacks in the general population, so I doubt Polish people when they think of Americans they think of blacks (while the reverse might be true, but the ad was about "Empowering your people" not "Empower American people")

      But I also guess that the Asian guy was left there because he blends better, color is more striking than other racial features.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:What about the Asian guy? by Michael+Nathan · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth: in Krakow, you're more than likely to run into quite a few Vietnamese people.

    3. Re:What about the Asian guy? by Bob_Who · · Score: 3, Funny

      If they Photoshopped in a white guy over the black guy, what about the Asian guy? I mean, how likely are you to see a Korean guy walking the streets of Poland? ( Or maybe I just don't know the streets of Poland).

      Korean? He's Canadian, just like a lot of Asians in Poland. However, the sex change operation threw me for a loop, his name is Brenda.

    4. Re:What about the Asian guy? by ruf10 · · Score: 1

      True, you don't know the streets of Poland. There are many times more Asians, especially Koreans than Black people including Africans and Afroamericans. Showing Black guy in polish ad simply won't work. There are very few of them, we don't really have racist problem against them and we really don't have to be PC on this.

    5. Re:What about the Asian guy? by Rashdot · · Score: 1

      Many Vietnamese refugees (Vietnamese boat people) went to communist countries in the 1970's.

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
  20. Was i the only one that ROFL'D? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I literally was on the floor dieing when i saw this...

  21. It's just the same by lsolano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Both pictures are just the result of what a marketing department researched out that sells.

    The black man in the US pictures DOES NOT mean that they're not racist, not at all. I'm not saying that they are racist either. He's there because he can help to sell more.

    That's it.

    We all have seen those TV adds, that, no matter what is being sold, show a Latin, an Asian and a black child just to appear that they have evolved into a society when stupid racism times are long gone.

    Races are just resources to sell, from a marketing point of view.

    Just in case I'm Latin and yes, I took already my diazepam pill ten minutes ago.

  22. Black guy? by Jerrei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see an ugly guy being photoshopped into a good looking one. What does race have to do with it?

    1. Re:Black guy? by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

      I see an ugly guy being photoshopped into a good looking one. What does race have to do with it?

      Why was there an ugly guy in the first place? Maybe he was Polish.

    2. Re:Black guy? by skorch · · Score: 1

      I see an ugly guy being photoshopped into a good looking one. What does race have to do with it?

      In an attempt to portray yourself as color-blind, what you've actually ended up suggesting is that you subconsciously see a black guy as ugly and a white guy as good looking.

  23. Photoshopping Real Life by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Around 20 years ago someone arranged a 'living flag' ceremony on Mount Trashmore in Virginia Beach, Virginia. Invitations went out to any and all military people stationed in the area, an enormous number of potential attendees. People showed up, the event was held, photographers took pictures. After, the phone company wanted to use some of the photos for the covers of the phone book. Upon examination it turned out that very few non-white persons had attended. The phone company couldn't see their way clear to use pictures of reality, so they held a bogus living flag event with a mix of non-whites of much greater proportion that in real life, and even in the military. (I suppose that of real life makes you then it may do the same for the basic, well devised lie, so the best way to prevent this uncomfortable feeling is to lie real big.) Those pictures got used. People who attended the event found out and publicized the fact, but after the initial splash the matter remained known but non-newsworthy. Also after, I was told but can't confirm that some of the photos were altered to increase the female presence and to make some of the people more attractive.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  24. He was originally white anyway by Overunderrated · · Score: 1

    Who cares, it was originally a white guy that got photoshopped into a black guy anyway. Yay forced diversity!

    1. Re:He was originally white anyway by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Who cares, it was originally a white guy that got photoshopped into a black guy anyway. Yay forced diversity!

      Seriously! Neither of those pictures looks right. The black guy's head is gigantic relative to his body and his wrist is a different color than his hand. The white guy looks even worse with that thick neck and his head is pointing the wrong way relative to his chest. He looks like Tyrannosaurus Rex.

      And don't get me started on the Asian guy and the woman with those crazy smiles.

      I mean come on, who smiles at a business meeting (while using Microsoft products at that)!?!?!? As far as I am concerned, those people are all either either child molesters looking at kiddy porn or aliens with people suits on.

    2. Re:He was originally white anyway by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  25. Re:Reality by Star_Gazer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That has nothing to do with the digital world, it just got easier. Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Che and Castro all had former "friends" who happened to fall out of grace removed from pictures in their times. But of course this is going back much more, way before the availability of photography. Media was never and will never be reliable in general.

    And I would argue that using raw data to is the only reliable way to inform yourself, anything that has been selected, annotated or edited is the problem, bringing over a certain point of view which is not necessarily neutral. Of course, this will seldom be possible because you dont' have access to that raw data.

  26. Corporate Culture Shows Its True Colors by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Whatever color your money wants it to be! There's no principle too low for your green backs baby! Everyone can be equally insulted !

  27. Notice the hand? by tehdimiku · · Score: 1

    You just have to admire the white guys' tan on his hand..It totally suits him!

  28. getting some sun by Dayofswords · · Score: 1

    so from a black guy, to a white guys with a hand tan!

    --
    Someday we'll hit the human carrying capacity. And the band will just play on.
  29. Who really cares? by Erythros · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The biggest question is.

    Who gets offended by these marketing tricks?
    Is it whites, blacks, or the target market?

    In thi s example the black guy was replaced, in the previous example the white guy was replaced. Both times I couldn't care less.

    Some people get so offended if there is the slightest bit of "racial" incorrectness. Either this or they want to take a stand on something, anything, and this is the most convenient, sensitive issue they can find.

    Frankly I am offended most by advertising in general. Specifically those that try to promote something that is unrealistic. ie: Weight loss PILLS, Drug companies telling everyone they have restless leg syndrome or the like. Who cares that the actors in an ad get swapped for another. Again these are paid actors/models. The photo is the property of the ad company or product's company and they are free to do with it what they want. There is nothing politically incorrect about the swap.
    "Stand up" for real issues or take the easy route and pop an Enzyte.

  30. its offical! by Dayofswords · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has changed it back to the original! Now, go back to working on an OS that actually has some power.

    --
    Someday we'll hit the human carrying capacity. And the band will just play on.
  31. Payment by Aelyew · · Score: 1

    Hopefully the original guy got paid for his hand modeling.

  32. Global profile by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    While, the black people in Poland most likely don't make up a large proportion in Poland to be targeted by ads, it was a stupid decision to photoshop that dude into oblivion.

    Why not just use another picture?

    Well, probably Microsoft wants to keep a global profile, which is why you also see an Asian too.

  33. Re:Flourishing white-power movement... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Nothing that surprising, really. For those that are not familiar with the region (Poland & east Europe in general) the following might come as a surprise but there is in fact a flourishing white-power movement stretching from Latvia in the north to Greece in the south. (Yeah, I know, Greece!? After getting all that âoecolorfulâ Ottoman "action" for nearly a thousands years the Greeks have NOW started worrying about the 'purity' of their blood?) The most prominent epicenters are Hungary and Poland.

    Not just the Turks, though. The "real" Greeks had been getting it on with Romans, Spaniards and those Caucusus-types like the Macedonians, who were ethnically Greek at all.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  34. Cheap attack by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    Look, I use Linux, and Microsoft is evil, etc.

    I've also met some Poles who were... old-fashioned, let's say.

    But let's not use this to make a cheap attack. The original photo was perhaps appropriate for politically-correct America, where it is normal to have ads in which 100% of the people in them belong to a minority. In Poland, that is pushing it too much. They modified the ad so that only 67% of the people were a minority (an Oriental guy, a white guy and a white girl). It's not as if they knocked it down to 33% or 0%. Do you realise that Poland has a population that is 96.7% ethnic Polish? Once you count other groups, that means that ~99% of the people are white. And you're whining that they only have 33% ethnic minorities in an advert, plus 33% female (in a male-dominated industry).

    What the fuck? Is Poland on the fucking Moon or something?

    "Oooh mommy, this ad scares me. What's the strange dark alien person doing there?"

    Let's be blunt. Poland is a backwards place. Most Poles happily stood by as the Nazis pretty much emptied the country of its Jewry (despite the fact that the Nazis thought the Poles little better). Anti-semitism is rife, as is homophobia.

    It's not a matter of being "scared". Do you not have even a layman's understanding of marketing, of localisation?

  35. Polish Race(ist)s by ImpetuousWombat · · Score: 1

    Races in Poland: Polish 96.7%, German 0.4%, Belorussian 0.1% Ukrainian 0.1%, other 2.7% (2002)
    According to: this

    They list races with 0.1%, but no black people. Seems more realistic to take the black man out. The Asian is pretty out of place too, and should be replaced with a sausage.

  36. Knowing how PC the US is these days... by davevr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... I wouldn't be surprised if the photo was originally was white and the US side photoshopped in a black guy.

    1. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      An older instance of politically correct "photoshopping":
      Flag on the Reichstag

    2. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Take a look at the windowsill to the right of each guy's head.

      I think it puts to rest any speculation on which photo was the original, if in fact either model was ever actually there.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      Look at the hand

    4. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Uh, that should be stage right, as in left :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    5. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by christophe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Warning: braod and probably abusive generalization below.)

      It's always funny to see such photos on American products or ads in my part of Europe.

      I remember the photo on the packaging of a computer mouse for children (from MS?): a boy with blue eyes and fair hair (in the center), a Chinese-looking girl, a black boy. This is an American mix, not a European one.

      To be PC in the West-European market, you have to add an Arab- or Turkish-looking child. In France the typical hair is darker than in the States and blue eyes not very common, so the fair hair boy looks like one of our Dutch tourists. Our proportion of Asian people is low outside of Paris, and they are more Vietnamese than Chinese.

      It depends heavily on the country (I suppose that you could say between the states inside the US.)
      You cannot be PC and have the same photo for all countries. Unless that you want to appear like a soul-less company with American-style management.

      BTW, the white person in many of such photos is always in the best position: on the mouse packaging, the boy was in the middle; in a recent ad for Visual Studio, the white young man is on the front and a Chinese-looking girl in the background; and in the photo from the article, the white woman is the only one active (she seems to be the boss). Neither do I see fat or disabled persons.

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    6. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      In addition to the poor job cloning the windowsill, and the black hand, there's the complete difference in light sources on the faces. Everyone has a light source to the right of the photo, playing off the idea that there's a screen they're looking at. But the photoshop job used someone with a strong light coming out of the left. I'd also point out there was a bad job cloning the vertical column of the building outside the window.

    7. Re:Knowing how PC the US is these days... by krupicka · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised either, except for the lighting. There is a shadow on the right shoulder, but the right side of his face is lit up.

  37. Not very many black people in Poland by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 1

    I heard a story from my mother where, when my grandmother from Poland first visited the United States, she saw a black guy and asked if he took his shirt off if there would be residue under his shirt.

    I'm just guessing that since Poland is mostly just poor farmers and just poor people in general, they don't really have as many immigrants coming in compared to Western Europe. But I suppose it could be due to racism as well, since most of the people going to Microsoft's website are going to be Polish businessmen, anyways.

    1. Re:Not very many black people in Poland by Ash-Fox · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note: This is my opinion, but it is based off a substantial amount of real life experiences and knowledge.

      I'm just guessing that since Poland is mostly just poor farmers and just poor people in general, they don't really have as many immigrants coming in compared to Western Europe.

      This is not the case at all.

      Having lived in Poland for over 12 years (I am a foreigner), I can tell you that Polish people tend to be quite prejudiced against anyone who is not Polish. They believe non-Polish people are stealing their jobs, their way of life and as such do everything in their power to discriminate against such people. I lived in Szczecin which is a major Polish border city to the German side, not too far away from Berlin.

      In Berlin, you could see about 25-45% of people on the street were black, in Poland, over the course of 12 years, I only saw one and Berlin was only two hours away. I heard quite a few stories about people complaining to companies that employed foreigners and even boycotted them for that reason. I've also been the subject of much discrimination in the country (unlike any of the other countries I've lived in).

      Poland it self is quite forward with technologies, mobile phone networks have the latest 3g technologies first, the Internet infrastructure has always been quite quickly deployed in Poland. Being one of the first countries to support nationwide dial up to having the first nation wide DSL systems in place.

      To put it simply, Poland is not ready for foreigners outside of their tourist cities (Warszawa, Krakow) and likely won't be for a while. Many people fear foreigners as some kind of evil, people of a different skin make it even worse for people who haven't ever seen a person with different skin colour before. They are not technologically backwards nor do they have a lack of access to resources beyond money (although the economy problems don't seem to have hit Poland much like the rest of the world).

      Don't get me wrong, Poland is integrating with the rest of Europe and learning to accept, but it is still very backwards in this regard (despite having had a "constitution" of their own before the USA acknowledging the rights of all individuals by law, no matter the race, gender, skin colour - not that it matters).

      The people are just prejudiced and it will take some changes before a black person is considered socially acceptable by most.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Not very many black people in Poland by Korey+Kaczor · · Score: 1

      I guess I was being a little flamebait in my post, but when I was in Krakow I did see at least one black person. I'm sure they were a tourist though, as it was in line for the Weisomethingorother salt mines.

      But to an extent there was some technological backwardsness: while spending the night in my relative's apartment in Katowice, there was not one single wireless network in the entire apartment complex.

      Though you were right about the phones and DSL.

    3. Re:Not very many black people in Poland by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I guess I was being a little flamebait in my post, but when I was in Krakow I did see at least one black person.

      Again, tourist cities are quite different from the rest of Poland (as mentioned in my previous post). Although you will still find many prejudiced people there - but they aren't as vocal or forward.

      But to an extent there was some technological backwardsness: while spending the night in my relative's apartment in Katowice, there was not one single wireless network in the entire apartment complex.

      I don't think a single apartment complex is a good example for the majority of Poland. I've been in plenty of apartment complexes in Poland that had a overwhelming amount of 802.11a/b/g networks overlapping each other (causing signal degradation obviously).

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  38. Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by HomerJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trademarks help protect corporate and product identity, and Photoshop is one of Adobe's most valuable trademarks. By following the below guidelines, you can help Adobe protect the Photoshop brand name.

    The Photoshop trademark must never be used as a common verb or as a noun. The Photoshop trademark should always be capitalized and should never be used in possessive form, or as a slang term. It should be used as an adjective to describe the product, and should never be used in abbreviated form. The following examples illustrate these rules:

    Trademarks are not verbs.

    CORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software.
    INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.

    Trademarks are not nouns.

    CORRECT: The image pokes fun at the Senator.
    INCORRECT: The photoshop pokes fun at the Senator.

    Always capitalize and use trademarks in their correct form.

    CORRECT: The image was enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements software.
    INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.
    INCORRECT: The image was Photoshopped.
    INCORRECT: The image was Adobe® Photoshopped.

    Trademarks must never be used as slang terms.

    CORRECT: Those who use Adobe® Photoshop® software to manipulate images as a hobby see their work as an art form.
    INCORRECT: A photoshopper sees his hobby as an art form. INCORRECT: My hobby is photoshopping.

    Trademarks must never be used in possessive form.

    CORRECT: The new features in Adobe® Photoshop® software are impressive.
    INCORRECT: Photoshop's features are impressive.

    Trademarks are proper adjectives and should be followed by the generic terms they describe.

    CORRECT: The image was manipulated using Adobe® Photoshop® software.
    INCORRECT: The image was manipulated using Photoshop.

    Trademarks must never be abbreviated.

    CORRECT: Take a look at the new features in Adobe® Photoshop® software.
    INCORRECT: Take a look at the new features in PS.

    The trademark owner should be identified whenever possible.

    Adobe and Photoshop are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States and/or other countries.

    1. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      How do you pronounce "(R)" then? I suggest a tame, 'lion-like' 'raawwwwr', so in speech, we should be saying:

      "The image was enhanced using Adobe-raawwwwr Photoshop-raawwwwr software."

      See here for more notes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF4qii8S3gw

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by Pecisk · · Score: 1

      Awww, poor lads. They desperately trying to avoid "to google" problem? :) Then they are way too late :)

      --
      user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
    3. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pronunciation:

      CORRECT: Adober Photoshoppr (like Flickr)
      INCORRECT: Adobe Arrr Photoshop Arrr

    4. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Adobe have to do this. If you allow your trademark to slip into common use as a word, it can stop being your trademark.

      Kleenex, Xerox and Hoover are all examples of where this has either happened or come very close to happening.

    5. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      no, they are trying to avoid the escalator, aspirin, and trampoline problem. all of those were once brand names but now have been officially genericized so that any company can use them

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    6. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Trademarks must never be used in possessive form.
      CORRECT: The new features in Adobe® Photoshop® software are impressive.
      INCORRECT: Photoshop's features are impressive.

      That one doesn't even make sense. When did proper nouns lose their identity when used in the possessive form?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    7. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by iroll · · Score: 1

      Wow. And I thought that seeing my Realtor® include the ® after their title in all of their emails to me was annoying.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    8. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by mcsqueak · · Score: 1

      Ha, I've gotten a very similar letter to this from the Bluetooth trade group, Bluetooth SIG.

      My company manufactures a Bluetooth product and we had used their trade dress slightly wrong. They were VERY serious about us using it to the T.

      For example, when writing about Bluetooth, the word Bluetooth is always supposed to be bold, italic, or in some other way made different than the rest of the text.

      And don't you DARE put the word Bluetooth under the Bluetooth logo, it is only to be placed BESIDE the logo!

    9. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Trademarks help protect corporate and product identity, and Photoshop is one of Adobe's most valuable trademarks. By following the below guidelines, you can help Adobe protect the Photoshop brand name.

      Gosh, I want to help!

      CORRECT: Without Adobe® Photoshop®, goatse.cx would not have been possible! (he used a rolled up manual to achieve that gape.)

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    10. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by ring-eldest · · Score: 1

      INCORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobeî Photoshopî software.

      CORRECT: SHOOP DA WHOOP!!!

    11. Re:Proper Use of Photoshop Trademark by geekoid · · Score: 1

      But photoshop(note the case) has entered common usage to mean cropped or edited photos.

      Welcome to reality, now please excuse me, I have to go blow my nose into a kleenex and poor some coffee out of me thermos.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Why does it have to be racist? by MrOctogon · · Score: 1

    I mean, it very well could be, but have we considered the possibility that some joker in MS Poland marketing dept thought it would be funny to stick his own face on something, and so he did a crappy job at it?

  40. relax by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    its just a tribute to michael jackson

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:relax by Haffner · · Score: 1

      its just a tribute to michael jackson

      best comment of the thread.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  41. This explains it by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Everyone keeps saying they "photoshopped" it. This is Microsoft. Adobe makes Photoshop. Clearly from that quality editing, they used a Microsoft photo editor like Picture It. Actually that's exactly what you'd get if you used Picture It lol.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  42. Local pointed head boss took wrong decision by DeltaQH · · Score: 1

    A local pointed head boss (PHB) took the wrong decission.

    He is surely being spanked right now by MS central office.

    At the same time, without much of a hush hush, put back the original photo or change it for one completely (and all white?) different.

  43. Typical reaction... by gaspyy · · Score: 1

    Another example of Microsoft evilness!

    There are very few black people in Eastern Europe; this has little to do with ethnic cleansing or racism. If fact, where I live, a black guy is big shot TV star just because he's relative good looking and his skin color makes him look exotic. This part of Europe has its share of racism, but it's toward gypsies.

    It makes sense to portray people that the viewers can relate to. It's something I tell my clients when they suggest stock photos. Just last week I had to do completely different sets of pics for a site that had US and UK versions.

    Still, the team that handled localization screwed up. They should have replaced the whole photo, rather than "fix" it (badly). Stock photos are pretty cheap and even if you order from Getty or ask for extended rights or something, it's still peanuts for any sizable company.

  44. trick photography by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Looking out there now, they changed it back to the black guy. Or maybe they didn't. Maybe it is a trick picture? Can anyone else see the sailboat?

    1. Re:trick photography by Rawjava · · Score: 1

      Look at the writing in the polish version, whoever is incharge of this is really lazy

  45. Advertising = Manipulation by syousef · · Score: 1

    What's really funny is that people are worried about the particulars of the lie they're being told about the product (what colour of happy family guy the product will magically transform you into) rather than the fact that it has become accepted practice in advertising.

    Truth in advertising got steadily eroded over time and now it's a joke.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  46. Who is more racist? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who is more racist, the person who decided the black guy should be photoshopped out? Or the person who think a black guy must be included because of the color of his skin?

    1. Re:Who is more racist? by jedrek · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody's saying the black guy has to be there, just... if you don't want a black guy in your picture, take a picture without the black guy in it. Don't do a shitty photoshop job with some other dude's head.

    2. Re:Who is more racist? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Who is more racist, the person who decided the black guy should be photoshopped out? Or the person who think a black guy must be included because of the color of his skin?

      Nah, who's racist is the target audience that actually changes its behavior in such a way that difference in sales is noticeable depending on whether you have the black guy or the white guy there (in both cases).

  47. Re:PC BS by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 1

    That was my first though, actually.

    I don't know about these days, but my parents grew up in the Czech Republic, and, at that time there were no Black people there, well maybe two in the whole country. Television was a rare novelty and a portable radio weight around 200 lbs, so there certainly wasn't even news coverage that Black people even existed.

    Racism?

    Maybe, but perhaps it's just that, still, Blacks "just don't exist" as far as the average Pole knows, and to depict one, in an ad would cause cries of WTF?

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
  48. Re:Reality by orzetto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Che and Castro all had former "friends" who happened to fall out of grace removed from pictures in their times.

    [citationneeded]. We agree on Stalin, but all the others did not use damnatio memoriæ. In particular, Che Guevara was never head of any country, so he could not have done it even if he had wanted it. Counterexamples welcome.

    --
    Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
  49. Look at the color scheme on this MS website by Michael_gr · · Score: 1

    Since when's Microsoft using red-orange-yellow? Never mind their photoshopping black people into white, now they're totally stealing Ubuntu's color scheme!

  50. Go Australia! by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many Polish peoples are also racists.

    By a strict definition, I'm also racist. Australians that I have encountered (without exception) in international airports have been unfailingly polite, helpful and friendly. Clearly a superior group of people.

    My next international vacation is definitely going to be in Australia.

    1. Re:Go Australia! by kklein · · Score: 1

      A word of warning, from someone who knows: Some of them are real dicks.

      Kinda like all people everywhere.

    2. Re:Go Australia! by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      You are clearly not British then. Many Australians have attitudes and use language that is offensive and to many racist towards the British.

    3. Re:Go Australia! by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Go there and you're surrounded by the rudest bunch of self-serving wankers ever to cause misery on the face of the earth.

      Whew. I thought that was us USians. Thanks for clearing it up!

    4. Re:Go Australia! by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      You are clearly not British then.

      Nope, never claimed to be.

      I love Bass Pale Ale and don't particularly care for Guiness. Does that redeem or condemn me?

    5. Re:Go Australia! by capnkr · · Score: 1

      Those were the sober ones. :D Get into a good 'piss drinkin' session with them, and you're much more likely to see (or be part of) a wee bit of fisticuffs and general mayhem. All in good fun, of course, and without much in the way of long-term hard feelings. At least that's how it was with my Ozzy mates on the North Shore, when the waves weren't up enough to be out surfing... Agreed, by and large great people.

      --
      "...there are some things that can beat smartness and foresight. Awkwardness and stupidity can." ~ Mark Twain
    6. Re:Go Australia! by boethius78 · · Score: 1

      Little bit of both

    7. Re:Go Australia! by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Yes, positive racial/national/cultural stereotyping does fall under racism, and yes it can be harmful.

  51. Reply to this post if you saw the original by melikamp · · Score: 1

    I find it very interesting that there seems to be no proof anymore that this ever took place.

    Reply to this post if you saw the original.

    1. Re:Reply to this post if you saw the original by gurner · · Score: 1

      Yep - was definitely there last night. Checked the Polish site this morning and... ...whoosh, all gone. ('cept for the shoddy orange bar).

  52. Re:Reality by Star_Gazer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll retract Che, as I couldn't find an example, but for the rest:
    http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/

    I don't want to google more, but I remember seeing many more examples over the years.

    You don't need to be a head of state to have photos edited, btw. It just need some devoted followers in the press or something like that.

  53. Maybe they changed it from White to black?! by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

    White people are victims of racism too.

  54. He's Using A Macbook, Did You Notice? by walkright · · Score: 1

    Everyone has been looking at the black/white issue. The real issue is that the model 'appears' to be using a white Macbook. Also, the logo in the original image has been shoddily cloned out (ie: you can JUST see where it was). After the Photoshop/Gimp-job, the cloning is less obvious due to artifacting. This raises questions: 1) why didn't MS replace the laptop with a generic Wintel? 2) should the laptop have been changed to black in compensation? (ok, ok, I'm kidding on that last one!) ps: who cares about proper use of the photoshop trademark?

    1. Re:He's Using A Macbook, Did You Notice? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      ps: who cares about proper use of the photoshop trademark?

      Adobe.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  55. Modded Funny but not a Joke by ChienAndalu · · Score: 4, Informative

    just to clarify that they aren't kidding

    1. Re:Modded Funny but not a Joke by martas · · Score: 1

      I don't know why they're complaining. No one could come up with a better marketing campaign in a million years that this. It basically means their product won over competitors, completely.

    2. Re:Modded Funny but not a Joke by ChienAndalu · · Score: 1

      The problem starts when people start "photoshopping" with GIMP and Corel (if that is still around), so it is a somewhat valid concern.

    3. Re:Modded Funny but not a Joke by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1

      Modded funny and true! Reality is sometimes the best joke.

  56. Tokens...I love them !! by shinzawai · · Score: 1

    I just love all the tokens in all IT marketing pictures. Token Asian male, token hottie female (with glasses), token white man (with that christian look), token black man. I especially like the ones where one of the tokens is standing over the shoulder and pointing something out to another token (normally a female), who is sitting down looking at a computer screen. A pity it does not reflect real society...especially the token hottie female (with glasses.....because that makes her a serious business women it IT!!)

    1. Re:Tokens...I love them !! by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I especially like the ones where one of the tokens is standing over the shoulder and pointing something out to another token (normally a female), who is sitting down looking at a computer screen.

      The male one points out something to the female one? Isn't the female one able to figure it out for herself? That's sexualism! :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  57. Thanks for Slashdoting my dropbox account guys... by jedrek · · Score: 1

    This email is an automated notification from Dropbox that your Public links have been temporarily suspended on account of generating excessive traffic. Your Dropbox will continue to function completely normally with the exception of Public links.

    eh...

  58. More photchopped than photoshopped by yogibaer · · Score: 1

    Sad, considering all the money they throw at advertising. But they would have gotten away with it, if it wasn't for you meddling kids!

  59. Re:Mount Trashmore? by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Mount Trashmore in Virginia Beach, Virginia.

    Is that like the local rubbish dump?

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  60. Too soon? by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well if Michael Jackson could do it...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  61. Re:Reality by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

    You don't need to be a head of state to have photos edited, btw. It just need some devoted followers in the press or something like that.

    Or you could upload it to 4chan and let the /b/tards loose on it.

    --
    Squirrel!
  62. polish original mirror by hany · · Score: 2, Informative

    Where the mirror of polish original? Looks like it got lost. :)

    --
    hany
    1. Re:polish original mirror by hany · · Score: 1
      --
      hany
  63. I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by kklein · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Um, no.

    I am a white American living in Japan. I've been here about 10 years. People say racist things to me all the time. No, they don't mean any offense (usually), but that doesn't mean that I don't get offended. But I didn't used to.

    When I first got here, little comments like "Oh! You can use chopsticks!" and "Wow, you can write kanji just like a Japanese person!" and "everyone move over; Klein needs space" (even though I am a very little guy), I thought it was quaint.

    Now when those comments are made, it makes me feel excluded. As if I can never be treated normally, just because of my brown hair and blue eyes. The novelty has worn off.

    A woman complemented me on my amazing Japanese a few months ago when I used a word I literally learned in my first semester of Japanese study. It bummed me out the rest of the day.

    Then there's the "special" treatment you get from cops. And drunks.

    Maybe at one point I thought minorities in the US were being oversensitive, but I think that after 10 years, I finally get it. Finding hateful racist people is getting harder every day, thank god, but when you're a minority, everything is just a little racist. You're treated differently, and it doesn't have anything to do with how you act or what you can or can't do. It just comes down to your physical attributes, and you can't change those. It just gets... tiring.

    But I have it better than minorities in the US or Canada or wherever. This is not my home country. If I ever get totally sick of it (and I'll be honest, there are some things happening these days that are really making me question if it's worth being here--the cops' treatment is getting more special by the day), I can go home to the US where I'll be just another regular white guy. But a regular black guy in the US can't go anywhere. It's his home, and his life is one of being treated differently every single day. I understand why some people get touchy. I'm getting touchy, and I don't have it anywhere near as bad as black people in the US.

    So there's the perspective of a white guy who has figured it out without any brainwashing.

    Watch your mouth, people. It sucks when the main thing people remember about you is your race.

    1. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by bobbagum · · Score: 1

      I think the key word here is prejudice, even I too get a lot of prejudiced treatment for just being not white although I live in my own country White tourists would say "Oh you spoke good English!" and I have to hold back not to retort with something condescending. Most of it is in good -intention, but yeah, it gets tiring I don't know what would be worse, people getting PC'ed up and can't speak their mind or people being ignorant

    2. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by nauvillain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Watch your mouth, people. It sucks when the main thing people remember about you is your race.

      Your experience is that of one belonging to a minority, and the response of most people to that minority. Would be the same if you were extremely handsome, if you had one arm, if you had a Lamborghini. Racism is more common than 'Lamborghinism', so it gets more attention. But it's the same phenomenon, and you cannot blame the average Joe for categorizing you according to the minority you represent.

    3. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Jurily · · Score: 1

      People say racist things to me all the time. No, they don't mean any offense (usually), but that doesn't mean that I don't get offended. But I didn't used to.

      "In 1999, 99.4% of the population was Japanese while only 0.6% belonged to other ethnic groups (mostly Korean)."

      Dude, you look like a tourist, what did you expect? The US, on the other hand, is the biggest melting pot of genes and cultures on the planet. How many people compliment a black guy on speaking English?

    4. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      A woman complemented me on my amazing Japanese a few months ago when I used a word I literally learned in my first semester of Japanese study. It bummed me out the rest of the day.

      No. YOU bummed yourself out. It's your mind dude; learn to control it. Some Zen will help ;)

    5. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

      A woman complemented me on my amazing Japanese

      Thats nothing. An American complimented me on my English after I told her I was from Australia. Toughen up!

    6. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by ztransform · · Score: 1

      I am a white American living in Japan. I've been here about 10 years. People say racist things to me all the time. No, they don't mean any offense (usually), but that doesn't mean that I don't get offended. But I didn't used to.

      Last year I visited Tokyo and got assaulted by a group of black adult men in Rappongi. For saying anything? No. Just for being white.

      As someone that grew up in a country with very few black people I have to say my education has been on the receiving end of much hostility and verbal/physical aggression in the UK and Japan. I'm starting to notice patterns. Multiculturalism is everywhere but have you ever heard a black comedian give a spiel that wasn't largely based on black/white differences or perceived oppression?

      Japan is a very unique country; it's not easy in a global society to maintain a largely homogeneous ethnic group and you, along with anyone else that has studied Japan, knows that you won't suddenly become an accepted Japanese. Neither will any of your children even if you do marry that Japanese wife.

      At least they are not randomly assaulting you. I never had anything to fear from Japanese people in Japan.

    7. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Clairvoyant · · Score: 1

      That's funny; all you can remember of the person complementing you on your Japanese was that she was a woman. You know; belonging to "the group of women". That's what people do; they judge. They always have and always will. People put other people into little boxes with "the others". That's how we humans operate. Saying that judging people on appearance is racism is just plain ignorance.
      Now using that process to actually hate people or do people harm would obviously be wrong. Simply because of the hate or harm part of the sentence, not because of which box you're using for it.

    8. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by pizzach · · Score: 1

      The irony: The same things that make Japan hellish for foreigners living there are the same thing that make it incredible fun for tourists. Tourists love to hear those things.

      When I was in a Japanese class in college, I had to smack someone around for being jealous of how I am treated as a white male in Japan. When you're asian, you at least have a chance to fit in. I will always be treated as a foreigner just from having brown hair and blue eyes.

      --
      Once you start despising the jerks, you become one.
    9. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Tink2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Lots, actually. "He's so well-spoken." You hear it applied to black people far more often than white people.

    10. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Snaller · · Score: 1, Funny

      "An American complimented me on my English after I told her I was from Australia."

      Well if any of you guys have actually learned English that is worth of praise indeed! *g*

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    11. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Zashi · · Score: 1

      Wow. I'm sorry. I hate^H^H^H^H am forever perturbed by stupid people of all nationalities and creeds. At least they didn't ask you if you have a pet kangaroo and love Crocodile Dundee.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    12. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by broeman · · Score: 1

      I don't know what tone they said these things, but after working with a lot of Asians, these sounds like compliments: "You are really doing great at emulating our culture, keep up the good work". It is very complementing to say that you are a big guy (at least they tell me :P). But it was Chinese, Thai, Indonesian, Malaysian and Vietnamese I have been working with, I don't know if Japanese culture is more different (at least I know that they are more conservative).

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
    13. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Zashi · · Score: 1

      It's one of the great things about America (and we're sadly running out of great things), but at least here you can be 100% real American no matter what country you are originally from. It doesn't work like that anywhere else. You can gain citizenship in Japan or France, but you will never be Japanese or French. Even if you are discriminated against for your race, at least you're "one of us" nationally.

      --
      Skiffy is Spiffy, but Ort is tort.
    14. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

      It's probably different as the Japanese are the most hardcore racists on the planet. It's not talking shit, look at their population makeup in Japan as well as just in general their history. As another poster said 99%+ are of fully Japanese ancestry. You can't maintain a ratio like that unless your country is a shithole and noone wants to go there, which japan certainly is not.

    15. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by mixmatch · · Score: 1

      Are you saying an Australian CAN'T have a pet kangaroo or love Crocodile Dundee? How presumptuous. You must be racist.

    16. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by PuritySyrup · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work like that ANYWHERE else? Dude, have you even heard of Canada? I have a sneaking suspicion people from other countries are thinking the same thing, but I haven't lived in them my whole life, so I'll let those people speak for themselves.

    17. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by drseuk · · Score: 1

      Wie geht's heute in Wien?

    18. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Well, that's because you Australians all talk funny. With funny words and all like Barbie. Why do y'all have a fixation on a small plastic female toy doll? Must be all those years of solitude on the prison continent. I mean really, what do you expect in a land that elects a life sentenced IRA prisoner as governor? Of course one of those same prisoners went on to become a long serving US Congressman from NY. So you see we're not all that different after all. Except, y'all don't know how to properly speak English.

      Also, it's biologically incorrect to say the Human race is comprised of many races. There is only one race of humans. The differences in humans could really only best be described as breeds. The Europeans, you can think of as thoroughbreds. Since they are so interrmixed that no one base breed can reliably be assessed anymore. Or you could just call them mutts. Thoroughbred being a fancy name for highly mixed "breed" (aka mutt), or thoroughly bred.. Sure there are traits that can be picked up, like the Caucasian breed. Then of course there are hundreds of African Breeds, and many Asian breeds, and a whole lot more. Although, I'm not certain there are enough differences between one group and another group in the Homo Sapiens Sapiens race to qualify as a breed. As a hobbyist animal breeder, I tend to say there aren't, but I don't have sufficient genetics data on the many types of humans to make an informed decision. Certainly there are characteristics that breed true among the many different types of humans. Interestingly, it has been shown over and over again that breeding for a single breed tends to accentuate the bad genes and that cross-breeding overall tends to improve the gene pool. So, all the concentration on keeping "races" pure only leads to weakening of the human race on the whole. We should rampantly and randomly (within the natural selection paramters) interbreed. In other words, we should deprogram people and let nature work the way it's supposed to.

      Unfortunately, I don't know how to overcome thousands of years of programming. Since everyone is a bit "racist". Everyone. Just like everyone is a "sexist". Partly, because if you say you aren't you prove you are, and there is no way to you aren't, because any attempt to prove you aren't proves you are.

    19. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Sometimes +5 just isn't enough.

    20. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by glennpratt · · Score: 1

      How many people compliment a black guy on speaking English?

      I suppose you didn't follow the last Presidential election?

    21. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      You're right, Ford Fiestas are always in shitty condition! My girlfriend's father has one, and apparently on a family vacation long ago, during a flood, they forded (ha) a river with it to get around traffic. Maybe that's why it's in such shitty condition...

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    22. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by glennpratt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... you cannot blame the average Joe for categorizing you according to the minority you represent.

      Why not? There a plenty of times when "average Joe's" assumptions are just plain wrong.

    23. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      Lots, actually. "He's so well-spoken." You hear it applied to black people far more often than white people.

      I understand why that would be offensive - "why, did you expect me to be unintelligible?" - but that has some basis in reality. A higher percentage of whites than blacks are middle or upper class, and income seems to correlate with speaking standard English, so I'd dare say that a greater percentage of whites than blacks speak standard English.

      Imagine that 100% of blacks spoke the same dialect as most whites. No one would say that a black was well-spoken for doing so. Now imagine that almost 0% of blacks spoke that dialect. People would definitely notice a black person who did because it would be so unusual. Somewhere, then, there's a point at which people switch from noticing to not noticing.

      If you wanted to involve racism in the subject, then put it on the media that tends to portray most blacks under the age of 40 as hip, slang-talking urbanites.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    24. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by dmdavis · · Score: 1

      Racism is more common than 'Lamborghinism', so it gets more attention. But it's the same phenomenon

      And I'll tell you from experience, it hurts just as much. Don't hate me just because I drive a nicer car than you!

    25. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Oh we did, on a little island called Okinawa. We found about 100 thousand good reasons there. If you are going to whine about history, at least try to include all of the details. The situation wasn't nearly as idealized as a lot of people like to make it out to be.

      The Japanese are not a people to be treated lightly. Your rhetoric only serves to denigrate them en masse.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have to disagree with income being a defining factor on how one speaks. Witness the countless multitude of suburban white boys who speak poorly in an attempt to appear as if they know what inner city life is like; as if one could absorb the horrors and incorporate it through mimicking speech and dress. However, you are correct with your second sentence "greater percentage of whites ..." -- those aforementioned white boys aside.

      I am glad you picked up on the racism angle; most people think it's actually a compliment to say that to a black person.

      I saw an Irish comedian who was bemoaning the fate of Irish entertainers in America as superstars. Around the turn of the century (and up until the 60s, as near as I can tell), it was the Irish who occupied the "entertainment darlings" status that works so well for black people today. He was wondering where all that optimism had went. I, of course, was thinking about the title of John Lydon's book "No Blacks, No Dogs, No Irish."

    27. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by aunticrist · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I really wish I had mod points right now.

    28. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Caue · · Score: 1

      lol. You are so wrong it even hurts. You should come to Brazil or go to Europe at least once. Then you will see a melting pot of genes and culture. I live in a german-heritage city in brazil, where most of the people are light-skin blue eyes. Just came from Salvador, most black/brown. Could go to Belem or Manaus, indigenous - portuguese, or to instate sao paulo for americans and canadians, or to sao paulo city where we have the biggest japonese populace of the world outside japan. down rio grande do sul for argentinians and spanish or to rio, to see all the tourists of the world. floripa for assorians and brasilia for dirty, dirty politicians (that's a joke - they are not people).

    29. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. It's rude. It's unnecessary.

      You're missing that I wouldn't say it because I can see how it could be construed as racist. When people do say it, though, they mean it as a compliment. Most people don't try to keep compliments to themselves.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    30. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      What was the word?

    31. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Antony+T+Curtis · · Score: 1

      I have actually had a brief conversation with an American who asked what language do British people speak in England....

      --
      No sig. Move along - nothing to see here.
    32. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Don't you speak German in Australia?

      Of course, maybe you're from the English speaking region that borders on Belize, but how would she know that?

    33. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by eepok · · Score: 1

      I don't think "racism" or "racist" means what you think it means. Their comments have nothing to do with believing your "race" is inferior by simple existence. It's more likely that they are prejudice (with reason!) about a white man's capability to speak Japanese to their standards. They have to do with you not being a native and their tendencies toward over-consideration. In these situations, you just need to speak up... consistently.

      These conflicts are typically 33% bad assumptions, 33% bad interpretation, and 33% lack of communication.

    34. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      How many people compliment a black guy on speaking English?

      How about the gentleman who's now the vice president, way way back in '07:

      Joe Biden is set to launch his second run for the presidency today but it will likely be overshadowed by some candid comments made in an interview with Jason Horowitz of the New York Observer.

      Most noteworthy is what he says about Barack Obama: "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," he said. "I mean, that's a storybook, man."

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    35. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I am a white American living in Japan. I've been here about 10 years. People say racist things to me all the time. No, they don't mean any offense (usually), but that doesn't mean that I don't get offended. But I didn't used to.

      Last year I visited Tokyo and got assaulted by a group of black adult men in Rappongi. For saying anything? No. Just for being white.

      Actually, it was probably because you were white and not interested in the girly club they were trying to get you to go to, or you were trying to completely ignore them.

    36. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Maybe dat's becuz he be keepin it real.

    37. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Prejudice to a race, with reason or without, good or bad, is racism. That's the definition.

      And since people want to eliminate racism because it hurts people, and he's hurt, it doesn't matter that she was justified in assuming whitey can't speak Japanese. It's still hurtful. (Yes, I'm 'whitey', too, and I'm studying Japanese.)

      And what good does it do to 'speak up consistently' when every random stranger does the same thing? One man cannot educate a whole country. At best he would be seen as very rude, and reinforce the 'rude ignorant foreigner' stereotype.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    38. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Now what's really freaky is, should you choose to leave and become "just another regular white guy", you'll soon find you oddly miss being slightly different and special. Gaijin-man syndrome!

    39. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by IronChef · · Score: 1

      But I have it better than minorities in the US or Canada or wherever.

      You are the first person I have ever seen defending Japan on the racism issue, though I understand you are not saying that it is not a problem. Obviously you have a lot of experience having lived there for so long. But the US is a big country and I think it is unfair to say that race relations are the same across every part of it.

      Maybe I am fooling myself, but I have a hard time believing that overall, racism is less severe in Japan than the US. Would the Japanese elect a citizen to be President if they were of, say, Chinese descent? Maybe they would. It's been a long time since I was a practicing Japanophile.

    40. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      Dialect *is* highly based around social status (and thus, income). However, more importantly one usually chooses to speak with a particular dialect depending on the situation and how the speaker wishes to identify himself.

      So, in your example many middle class 'white boys' wish to identify with the culture of their inner city heroes, but would not speak that way in a more formal setting. While even the most uneducated inner city black person could speak 'standard English' (exposure is impossible to avoid due to media), but chooses not to in order to show solidarity with his social group.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    41. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      The problem is indeed YOUR PROBLEM, not theirs. You are the one who is insecure, not them. You're the one feeling inadequate among others. It doesn't matter if they point those things out or not, it IS odd that you as an American can write in Kanji and use chopsticks, most of us can't.

      Get used to it, what you are experiencing is called life, its what happens when you are the odd man in the situation. It happens right here in America too, to white people by white people. Move from New York City to a small rural town in Georgia and you will get the EXACT SAME TREATMENT, you will never be one of them. You AREN'T one of them, thats just reality, get used to it.

      Your perspective isn't from a white guy who has figured it out without any brainwashing, your perspective is from a white guy with no perspective or concept of how the entire animal kingdom works.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    42. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Tink2000 · · Score: 1

      would not speak that way in a more formal setting

      Having been involved in the largest state university in my state for the last 9 years and actively managed a crew made of nothing but college students, I have to disagree with you vehemently on that point ;).

      The word "like" springs to mind.

    43. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      There is racism even amongst Japanese. I don't understand the details but a Japanese friend told me about very deep racism against "low class" Japanese who used to live in slums and work with death or sewage. They hire investigators to this day to expose dishonorable ancestry before agreeing to marriage.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    44. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Archwyrm · · Score: 1

      I am going to assume that you were either born in the US or came here at an early age (or another English speaking country, since you have not specified). Thus it should be safe to assume that you speak completely unaccented English, i.e.: you would get no different treatment over the phone. If someone cannot recognize that, then that person is most likely stupid. And like a lot of other people have been saying, that is not your problem, but theirs. Indeed, if stupid people were your problem, you would have a lot of problems.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power. -- Mussolini
    45. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Your experience in Japan would be vastly different if you were not white.

      Any person belonging to a race other than Japanese or white are presumed to be either criminals or illegal migrant workers.

      Whites are on their list of "preferred races". Why do you think many over there dye their hair blonde and get eyelid enhancement surgery?

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    46. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      How many people compliment a black guy on speaking English

      It seems like every time a black person runs for public office, the first complement I hear from supporters is always "he speaks very eloquently." - as if they're not supposed to.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    47. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      The low class in Japanese society you're referring to is burakumin".

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    48. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I tried to look it up and didn't find anything easily. It was still bothering me that I couldn't remember or even find the name.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    49. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by thermal_7 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Japan for 2 years and experienced all the things you mention (minus the cops) and they bugged me the same way, but since coming back to my home country I have gained some perspective.

      That is not racism. Japanese people are just on the whole very very culturally insensitive. We (English speakers) generally don't compliment each other and when we do it is usually heart felt. The Japanese people do it ALL THE TIME. Especially when they meet someone new and especially when they are nervous, like when meeting a gaijin.

      Similarly, they don't see people in American using chopsticks on TV and spent years and years learning kanji in a mind numbingly ineffective method, so they won't expect you to be able to use chopsticks or write kanji.

      You can't really expect much else from a country with something like 1% foreigners. Plus they still show Full House on TV.

      However, as a foreigner you can know their culture. You are the one who needs to show cultural sensitivity and respond in ways they expect when they compliment you. They may be insensitive but there is no ill intent.

    50. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by alexander+m · · Score: 1

      I was left bemused once after being told i spoke really good american considering i'm from another country... i'm english ;-p

    51. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      What is the Japanese for 'delicate flower', I feel you may get some use of that phrase.

    52. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      you cannot blame the average Joe for categorizing you according to the minority you represent.

      Since when does anyone "represent" a minority?
      You sign up to be a representative, then sure, you get what you deserve. You wave that flag proudly and you deserve all the pros and cons of doing so.

      But, if you are born that way or otherwise come to it through no action of your own, then its bullshit to accept people pigeon-holing you.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    53. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You're missing that I wouldn't say it because I can see how it could be construed as racist. When people do say it, though, they mean it as a compliment. Most people don't try to keep compliments to themselves.

      Most racism isn't about purposefully being a jackass. Its about applying stereotypes without regard for the individual.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    54. Re:I'm sorry, but you are wrong. by kmac06 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because the Japanese are known to be extremely racist, and never accepting of any outsider?

  64. It drives me nuts by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    that every company feels that every time they show a group of customers it has to be "diverse". For example the pic from the article: asian man, black man, white woman. Wow I guess MS doesn't have any white men using their products, and here I thought that was the majority in IT. Who knew. Anyways seems stupid to go out of your way to create artificial diversity.

  65. Dude, what about that asian guy... by Kreeben · · Score: 1

    ...he is very strange-looking and foreign. Me no like! Me only like polish white dudes. Me not buy from you!

  66. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7308/microsoftlocalisation.jpg

  67. Re:anfit by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    xenophobia === hate xor distrust of other groups

    So if you both hate and distrust other groups, you're not xenophobic?

    Well, actually your definition is wrong anyway: Xenophobia is by definition the fear of other groups (phobia = fear).

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  68. White/black by lars_boegild_thomsen · · Score: 1

    Hey - what if it was the other way around? This is silly. The original could have been a European picture with 3 white guys and it order to fit American political correctness a black had to be edited into the picture. Sigh!

    Simple fact is - while America have a considerable black population in central or Northern Europe they do NOT, so seeing a black guy at a business meeting is rare. That is not racism but a simple result of very few black people living there.

  69. "the ports in the rear that get the most use." by stupidflanders · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's what she said.

  70. blending is common amongst skilled workers by LukeCrawford · · Score: 1

    I don't remember the last time I worked on a team with more than five people who were all US born. "Nativisim" and Xenophobia make you dramatically less useful if you are hiring or working with skilled workers. If you need the best in the world, sometimes you have to look outside your back yard.

    Usually you find this racism and xenophobia amongst the lower classes. Sure, if you are hiring for a job making burgers, where one guy is about as good as the next you can hire a bunch of guys who talk like you and do fine. But if you are hiring skilled workers, and you turn away people who come from a different background, you will get your lunch eaten. Your competition? they will hire the best people they can get, and eat your lunch.

    1. Re:blending is common amongst skilled workers by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The difference between skilled workers and the "lower classes" is that the lower classes tend to not integrate; they're the ones which form the ghettos and will sometimes foster negative worldviews against their host country. This can be readily seen in Italy and France, as well as in parts of the Southwest US. It's not endemic to non-natives, either, and it can take a long time to integrate: Chinese in San Francisco, blacks in Hollywood, and until fairly recently the Irish and Italians in Boston and NY.

      Skilled workers, on the other hand, tend to adopt a great deal more of the prevailing culture due to being a smaller percentage of the overall "local" population: there is social pressure to integrate. At the same time, they offer a "cultural injection" to the local area, giving it a new life and color.

      Personally, I'm 100% for immigration. Hell, "illegal" immigration does not bother me so much. The problem I have is that the numbers of immigrants are too many (throughout the Western world) for the immigrants to effectively integrate with the parent society to any significant degree within a generation. Groups like Lutheran Social Services don't help matters by moving large non-endemic populations to various places throughout the Midwest at a time: those groups do not integrate, they form ghettos (albeit in smaller or medium sized cities, so they don't look like an inner city ghetto).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  71. What is really ridiculous... by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    ...is the fact that big corporations find it necessary to put absurd numbers of minorities into their marketing photos. If you were to believe the marketing literature, the logical conclusion would be that white males are rapidly becoming extinct.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  72. He could have been... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...mongoloid, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  73. Stupid marketroid smiles.. by tobe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm just totally amazed that marketing hasn't realised that no-one swallows this 'we're all at work and we're totally loving it' utter bullshit that every file photo they have exudes. Just look at them in that photo.. all sitting there with their brilliant teeth, perfectly pressed business suits not a hair out of place and those BIG CHEESEY SHIT-EATING GRINS. Is she showing them pictures of kittens ?? Kittens are nice. They make me smile. But no.. the inference is that it's a fucking Powerpoint presentation.

    FUCK OFF WITH THAT ALREADY. Have you ever seen a scene like that in your office. Don't you normally have at most a neutral expression whilst you're concentrating. This ridiculous crap they try to feed us that using their product will make us taller, more attractive, whiten our teeth and let us get more sleep is just insulting. It's software. Sell it like bridges.

    And HR can all fuck off too...

  74. Reason by Tribbin · · Score: 1

    Money, marketing... tells more about what they think is appealing to people in Poland.

    --
    If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
  75. Re:ugly Black guy? by rs232 · · Score: 1

    Couldn't they have made the new guy the same color as his hands ?
    -

    score:5 interesting ????

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  76. couldn't they have just made him whiter .. :) by rs232 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Couldn't they have just made him 'whiter' ? White Obama Senator Obama

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
  77. Poland is our Texas ?. by rs232 · · Score: 1

    "I would also add that Poland is often seen in Europe as our Texas"

    First off, there is no "Europe" to belong to that anyone here would identify with as compared to the United States. In fact we don't even give Poland a seconds thought. Are you sure you're really from "Europe" ???

    they are fervently catholic, anti-gay, anti-abortion, and in favor of death penalty (despite it being abolished on all EU). Sorry AC, I know all Poles are not like that, but your leadership really doesn't make Poland the most sexy country to be in when you don't obey the Pope's commands.
    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.

    --
    davecb5620@gmail.com
    1. Re:Poland is our Texas ?. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      There are European laws, there is a European Court of Justice and there are European financial institution. This alone makes Europe something more than a loose alliance of country. I know, there are no European spirit in the same way that there is an American spirit and that is a shame. Yeah, I'm from Dauphiné, France, Europe. I'd like to call myself a citizen of the world, but see the criticism you get when you even dare call yourself "European" ?

      I was born in France, which is a place I like. I also like many things from English and German culture, with who we share a lot. I feel I am part of their history as well as France's. I consider that the Belgian political crisis is a problem in the country where I live. I consider that when the EU president is the euro-sceptic Czech president, it is a failure of my country. My country is the area chere I can drive without meeting any border control, where I can pay with my money (this is a work in progress), where I can rent a flat easily, where I am recognized as a citizen, not a foreigner.

      Americans usually think of Europe like USA. They imagine something more integrated than it already is. This is erroneous but this is a very useful image that they reflect upon us. The main thing that Europe lacks to be considered a country, is the very notion in its citizens' mind that it is indeed a country. (Oh, and an army also, right)

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Poland is our Texas ?. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the problem is that we think of the USA as being more integrated than it already is.

      Certainly, the USA has a mostly common language, a common currency, and most people can name their president; none of which is true in the EU, but the individual states in the US do have more autonomy than EU countries.

      Having said that, if you ask someone the US which country they come from, they say the US, not Kentucky or Maryland. If you ask someone in the EU which country they come from, they say France, England, Scotland or whatever rather than Europe, or even Britain. People from Gibraltar, and protestants in Northern Ireland are probably the only ones who say they are British first.

    3. Re:Poland is our Texas ?. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      but the individual states in the US do have more autonomy than EU countries.

      I'll need clarification on that. The only limits to a country's sovereignty in the EU are the European laws and the European Court of Justice. How is it different from US federal laws and US Supreme Court ? There is no federal police like the FBI and the scope of the European Court is, from my understanding, very narrow. There is also no central authority that can engage EU in a war. All military operations are decided on an individual basis. If you remember correctly, during the Iraq war, UK and Poland helped US while other European countries chose not to. I am not sure that California for instance could have opted out of Iraq...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Poland is our Texas ?. by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      This is true. On the other hand, California doesn't have the Federal Government telling it that it must charge sales tax on road and bridge tolls for example, or that it isn't allowed to lower the sales tax rate below 15%.

  78. There is no race! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Come on people, pay attention to science, there is no basis in science for dividing humans into *race* - it was a cultural construct meant to suppress people who looked different. And you are perpetuating it if you keep referring to "race" as a valid concept.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:There is no race! by RobVB · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if you won't listen to Snaller, listen to Admiral Adama.

      --
      I'd rather you rationally disagree than irrationally agree.
    2. Re:There is no race! by moeinvt · · Score: 1

      "There is no basis in science for dividing humans into *race*"

      I think you meant to say "religion" as opposed to "science". If you believe in $deity, we may all be "equal" under his/her eyes. If you believe in making observations of the natural world and drawing conclusions (=~ science), it's obvious that there are differences among the races. You said in your bloody post that the people of the various races "look different"! Is that somehow "random chance" or is there an underlying genetic basis?

      From a SOCIETAL standpoint, I do think that race is greatly over-emphasized as a means of fomenting divisions amongst the masses. I'd like nothing better than to live in a society that was genuinely race-blind. Claiming that "race" has no "scientific" basis is just silly however.

    3. Re:There is no race! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Besides skin color, Leukemia, vitamin D production in sunlight, Tay-Sachs disease, likelihood of diabetes, income levels, average height, and likelihood of single parent childhood? No, I can't imagine another twenty or thirty reasons reason to classify by race.

      But I bet if I looked I could find some, anyway.

    4. Re:There is no race! by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      So, what you're saying is that a doctor should in sound mind still give me, a white male, a test for sickle cell anemia because race is a completely invalid concept?

      Right . . .

      Understand, race isn't something that should be used to discriminate, but to say it doesn't even exist is just trying to wish away reality.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    5. Re:There is no race! by babblefrog · · Score: 1

      Arrgh! Look at your list. Those are statistical, and say nothing whatsoever about any individual.

    6. Re:There is no race! by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      Just out of curiosity, which "race" is Tay-Sachs unique to? I know perfectly well what Tay-Sachs is, but I'm curious to hear your answer.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    7. Re:There is no race! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      It's not unique. It's more common to Jews. They're enough of a distinct 'race', by many common usages, that their noses, hair, and builds offset them from many other groups. And with their tendency to marry Jews, historically, and their tendency not to encourage others to join their community, they have some fascinating inbreeding genetic traits.

    8. Re:There is no race! by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      yeah, pretty much what I thought you'd say. So, by standard, there's a "Jewish race", and then I guess there must also be a "Cajun race" and a "French Canadian race" (the other groups that come up with Tay-Sachs). I suppose there must be an "Italian race", since they have pretty recognizable noses and hair, and how about a "Scandinavian race" to cover all of those tall blonds with blue eyes, who are clearly distinguishable from the dark-haired, dark-eyed and round-faced "Polish race". We can keep sub-categorizing forever this way, so I'm assuming that you'd concede that there's no "White" or "Caucasian" race, as people traditionally called that really fall into plenty of more specific categories based on things like "noses, hair, and builds" which "offset them from many other groups". Or is there one particular group who are the *real* white people, who just put up with all those not-quite-whites who just think they are?

      Or maybe the word you're looking for is ethnicity, not race. Snaller was was perfectly correct, the idea of "race" is an artificial construct, with lines that can be moved anywhere you want based on whatever agenda you're perusing at the time.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    9. Re:There is no race! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No, the 'Cajun' are too genetically mixed, from too many nations and cultures. French-Canadian? Not sure, don't know many.

      Ethnicity may be a better word, but ignoring the word "race" for such groups is ignoring common usage. Like insisting that centripetal force does not exist, it will get you ignored a lot in the real world.

    10. Re:There is no race! by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      What Snaller said was:

      Come on people, pay attention to science, there is no basis in science for dividing humans into *race* - it was a cultural construct meant to suppress people who looked different. And you are perpetuating it if you keep referring to "race" as a valid concept.

      You made an attempt to counter his statement, but I pointed out the absurdity of your argument (which you largely skipped over).

      Are there times where "race" can be used as a convenient shorthand to convey an idea? Sure, but the common racial catagories are most definitely social constructs, and fairly arbitrary ones at that. Even in common use, you'd be hard pressed to find consensus about what constitutes a race? Hint, Jews are followers of a religion, comprising of more than a single ethnicity. Are there multiple "Jewish races"? Or does the concept of race in this context simply break down?

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    11. Re:There is no race! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      There are not merely "times" when "race" is a commonly used description. It's even frequent. Look at the first line of the article on races for human beings at Wikipedia, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_(classification_of_human_beings).

      > The term race or racial group usually refers to the categorization of humans into populations or groups on the basis of various sets of heritable characteristics.[1]

      Then look at the third line:

      > Conceptions of race, as well as specific ways of grouping races, vary by culture and over time, and are often controversial for scientific as well as social and political reasons.

      And the article goes on. It's interesting reading in light of your points raised. I suspect that you're caught at the point of denying the very existence of the concept, because it has so often been wildly misused. That's socially laudable, but linguistically confusing when you or I can point to plenty of examples of "race" in the people around us worldwide. "Ethnicity" is a better word, but it's simply too long. Personally, I prefer to acknowledge that the concept exists so that I can acknowledge and try to manage its effects.

    12. Re:There is no race! by NiteShaed · · Score: 1

      And from the same Wikipedia page:
      Some argue that although race is a valid taxonomic concept in other species, it cannot be applied to humans.[5] Many scientists have argued that race definitions are imprecise, arbitrary, derived from custom, have many exceptions, have many gradations, and that the numbers of races delineated vary according to the culture making the racial distinctions; thus they reject the notion that any definition of race pertaining to humans can have taxonomic rigour and validity.[6] Today many scientists study human genotypic and phenotypic variation using concepts such as "population" and "clinal gradation". Many contend that while racial categorizations may be marked by phenotypic or genotypic traits, the idea of race itself, and actual divisions of persons into races or racial groups, are social constructs.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] However, the concept of race may be useful in forensic anthropology. According to forensic anthropologist George W. Gill, "race denial" not only contradicts biological evidence, but may stem from "politically motivated censorship" in the belief that "race promotes racism".[4]

      I disagree with Gill. I dislike the idea of race largely because it's imprecise, using race in most cases to make any kind of meaningful point is like trying to solder a chip with a flamethrower. You already fell into that trap yourself once trying to go with Jews and Tay-Sachs. The reality is that there's one particular ethnic group (the Ashkenazi), which tends towards Judaism, where the condition is generally found. To suggest that the Ashkenazi are a race unto themselves would be akin to stating that Sicilians are also a distinct race, and to suggest that it's a feature of some overall "Jewish race" that the Ashkenazi are part of is silly.

      Race is most certianly a social construct, and it's generally based on fairly arbitrary features.

       

      Personally, I prefer to acknowledge that the concept exists so that I can acknowledge and try to manage its effects.

      What effects would those be? The ones that jump to mind that you can use such a broad phrase to describe tend to be social, and related to the entire obsession of classifying different "races", rather than traceable to any direct inheritable traits that are applicable to such large numbers of people contained in any of these classifications.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
  79. And yet.... by g8oz · · Score: 1

    ....And yet they left the Asian guy in

  80. Re:HEIL HITLER FROM KRAKOW! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Nothing on netcraft.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Re:Mount Trashmore? by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

    It's a park built on top of an old rubbish dump, actually.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  82. Black Guy Still Gets Box Pay? by JamesPr · · Score: 1

    I'm wondering whether the black guy still gets his pay for being on the Polish box. Sure, his face isn't on the box. However, his chest and his hand are. I would hope, he would still get at least 75% of box model revenue. The face is a relatively small part of the entire human anatomy. This is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

  83. Microsoft's Poland? by JimR · · Score: 1

    ... Microsoft's Poland ...

    Wait. Microsoft have invaded Poland? I've got a bad feeling about this.

    --
    #exclude <ms/windows.h>
  84. Similar? by PuritySyrup · · Score: 1

    Sure, if by "done something similar," you mean "the exact opposite." Poland 'shopped a black guy out of the picture. Toronto 'shopped a black guy INTO the picture.

  85. I don't see it by gravis777 · · Score: 1

    Main picture? There is a Silverlight banner ad. The Polish site does indeed have a picture of a single white guy in one of the ads, and is Photoshopped (although this is probabably just for the art - I do not see any evidence in "head changes"). The US site does not show picture of anyone in the banner ad on the main page - its all ads for server 2008, Virtualization and DirectX.

  86. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by mcvos · · Score: 1

    http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7308/microsoftlocalisation.jpg

    That's a much better way to do it. Not nearly as obviously photoshopped, and looks much more natural.

    I'm sure the Polish Wookie population would also appreciate this.

  87. Not any more by crimperman · · Score: 1

    MS Poland's site now shows the same photo as the US one.

    Either MS have changed the photo to the original or the one on the link in TFS is a fake (e.g. not produced by MS).

    1. Re:Not any more by crimperman · · Score: 1

      Sorry replying to myself..

      It seems MS have copped a plea to editing the photo and taking the black man out..

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8221896.stm

  88. microsoft not the only by kubaZA · · Score: 1

    It seems that microsoft is not the only company to photoshop people of colour in or out of their sites.

    for instance, this polish university has a more "diverse" photo for the english version of their site than that of the polish counterpart.

    polish - http://www.umlub.pl/index.html
    english - http://www.umlub.pl/index2.html

    but just like many people have already mentioned i would chalk this off to marketing demographics rather than any form of racism.

  89. Medical University of Lublin by antheque · · Score: 1

    This kind of marketing strategy is not unique to Microsoft. Please compare the Polish and English website of the Medical University of Lublin - a city in south-eastern Poland. http://www.umlub.pl/ http://www.umlub.pl/index2.html

  90. Not that big a deal by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    I used to work in a web shop which did this once. The site had a stock photo with three white people. The client wanted something more diverse. Rather than pay for a new stock photo the web designer just photoshopped one black and one asian. It came out convincing enough. Of course, he did the hands too and there wasn't another version of the page out there with an original copy of the stock photo. I bet that's more common than we know.

  91. yeah, photoshopping black people is nothing by Weezul · · Score: 1

    I was just in Poznan Poland for a math conference. We had a tour one day. Our first stop the tour guide says : "What is this place?" people answer "a synagogue". He says "Yes, it was a synagogue" but what is it now, nobody knows. He says "It's a swimming pool, so now you can swim where the Jews used to pray." I shit you not.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  92. Profit? by Cartotype · · Score: 1

    you're saying "1. We're not... 2. We're owned... 3. We're either... 4. We're probably ... 5. We're not... 7. But we did run..."

    I see 1 through 5 and I see 7, but what's number 6?

  93. Definitely the White Guy is the original by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    The white guy seems to be in a much more natural pose, and his head seems to be in better proportion to his body. My wife mentioned that she assumed the black guy was the fake, and I'm starting to believe she's right.

    1. Re:Definitely the White Guy is the original by lee1 · · Score: 1

      But the white guy (I only looked at the mirror url) has a strong light shining on the right side of his face that's not reflected from any other nearby surface.

    2. Re:Definitely the White Guy is the original by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      Hah good point. Maybe it's just the shining awesome coming from his Macbook? Oh that's right, the only thing coming off of my Macbook is little chipping bits of bezel, so it must be something else :-)

      I've been half-heartedly scouring Corbis and others looking for the original myself. I'm going on the assumption that most people are lazy, and would pick something in the first couple of hundred results of their search criteria, so I'm not digging too deep.

    3. Re:Definitely the White Guy is the original by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They both are, look at the shadows and reflection.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  94. Demographic Targeting by mckinnej · · Score: 1

    This is normal stuff in advertising. Smart advertising is tailored to the audience. Watch McDonald's commercials in LA, NY, and Atlanta. They are all very different. For example, the actors in the Atlanta commercial have southern accents. Racist? Hardly. The outrage over this is just more people looking for a reason to be offended.

  95. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by spun · · Score: 1

    No African-Americans in Poland doncha know so it is only natural. Imagine the funny looks of the poles when this face appears.

    African-Americans are usually only found in... America !! As far as I know, there are no African-Europeans, and no African-Asians. There may be some African-Australians. but they call them something else down there, maybe Australian-Africans, seeing as how everything is upside down down there.

    Are you trolling or have you just never left the states? There are most certainly lots of people of African descent in Europe. In Asia, not so much, but they do exist.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  96. Microsoft thinks Polish people are dumb by srobert · · Score: 1

    "...a picture with three different skin colors for three people will not be interpreted as affirmative action, but unwanted external cultural influence."

    That is insightful. Americans often see every matter involving people of multiple races as a "racial" matter. But doesn't the decision to change the picture, so every one will look more "Polish", suggest that Microsoft thinks the Polish people are dumb enough to believe that Microsoft Poland is a Polish company that's not influenced by its international corporate masters?

  97. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by MooUK · · Score: 1

    But they're not African-American, now are they?

  98. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    The history textbook my daughter was given in elementary school contained a statistic for the ethnic breakdown of New York state circa 1650. It listed the percentage of African-Americans. How there were African Americans before there was an America is still a mystery to me.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  99. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by rpresser · · Score: 1

    There was an America in 1650 -- in fact, there were two of them (North and South). There just wasn't a United States of America.

  100. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by jdgreen7 · · Score: 1

    Wow, that was the first thing that's actually made me laugh out loud in quite a while. Nicely done!

  101. Be careful for what you wish for by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

    But I have it better than minorities in the US or Canada or wherever. This is not my home country. If I ever get totally sick of it (and I'll be honest, there are some things happening these days that are really making me question if it's worth being here--the cops' treatment is getting more special by the day), I can go home to the US where I'll be just another regular white guy. But a regular black guy in the US can't go anywhere. It's his home, and his life is one of being treated differently every single day. I understand why some people get touchy. I'm getting touchy, and I don't have it anywhere near as bad as black people in the US.

    You really want to come back here to the USA? I personally find the current political situation so disheartening that I am wondering if I really want to stay here the rest of my life. And I've been born and raised here. When George W. Bush was president, some of the liberal nut bags wanted to kill him. Now that Obama is president, it's the right wing nut bags who want to do the same. There's no chance for any level headed discussion any more about opposing views. The political situation here is basically that nobody wants to listen to anybody who disagrees with them. I always considered myself a Republican, but now I'm an independent. I can't support a party (the Republicans) whose game plan seems to be pretty much "We hate the Democrats! We have no solutions for the problems, but we hate them! Vote for us! Also, we love stupid people! Stupid people, we are your party!" I can't be a Democrat because of too many fundamental differences of opinion. Libertarian? I think I'd rather be a Communist than that. So you really want to come home to this mess?

    You know, if maybe you weren't so focused on being offended by everything, you could probably turn this situation around. I'm guessing that you have no sense of humor. Well, it sucks to be you. With regards to the chopstick comment, you could say something like "Yes, and I only lost one eye learning how to do it". As far as kanji goes, that's a pretty terrific accomplishment for a westerner. I'd have thought honestly that acquiring such skills would take so many years that it would be essentially impossible for most people. I think you're being praised here but taking it like an insult. As far as needing more space goes, I'd suggest saying "Yes, I do and I want you to know that I can be hired to give basketball lessons". Can't help with the cops as I have no idea what that is like. Your circumstances are pretty much what you make of them and I'd say that you might as well leave as it seems to me that you're pretty much in the "I'm SO tired of being here" mode and not likely to get out of it. America is no picnic these days with people threatening to "water the tree of liberty", but I will admit that you'll be spared the "racist" comments you are tired of in Japan.

  102. I am happy to say by geekoid · · Score: 1

    that the picture looked fine and wouldn't cause a stir in America.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I am happy to say by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1

      Yes it would cause a stir in America. If Americans knew Microsoft had changed the picture it would send the message that African Americans do not know how to use software or a computer. If the picture was just two white people and an Asian guy the Asian guy would be out of place and people would complain. All people do now days is complain about pointless stuff.

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  103. Nice touch by geekoid · · Score: 1

    with the "fngarrrgh"

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by MooUK · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd doubt that textbook was written in 1650 - the wording would be modern.

    At a guess, the original wording for that census would have been "Negro" or similar.

  105. Re:world famous celebrities by prakslash · · Score: 1

    Your examples are of world-famous celebrities. They are popular cross-racially. People's knowledge of these celebrities and their identification with these celeberities is based on other things - not the skin color. In ads featuring unknown models in normal settings such as home and office, it is different.

  106. How many? by busydoingnothing · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many Polish people it took to Photoshop that picture...

    (Hey, I'm Polish. I can say that.)

  107. Re:Know your market - not racist at all by pbhj · · Score: 1

    So, the polish MS group decides to replace one of the images with a native polish image - they just chose one person at random to replace, or possible the central figure.

    It is those who interpret this as being a racial slight that are in the wrong, it's just one guy being photo-swapped for another - the colour of the guys is not relevant.

    If they'd swapped him for the asian character would everyone still assume it was racist. Would you be up in arms about Polish xenophobia if they'd swapped the pale skinned guy??

  108. XP setup by damonlab · · Score: 1

    When doing an XP install and you get to the point where you give the computer a description, the following text is displayed:

    "You can also give your computer a friendly description. Unlike the computer name, the computer description may contain spaces and other special characters. "David's game machine" and "The Chavez Family Computer" are examples of computer descriptions."

    Hmmm... David (white sounding name) gets an expensive game machine all to himself, while the entire Chavez (Hispanic sounding name) family have to share one computer. No, nothing implied there.

    1. Re:XP setup by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think it is quite daring for MS to support a South American leader opposed to American industrial interests.

      MS obviously knows which side it's betting on winning that little conflict, and what OS they'll be wanting the people to support when they rise through the joys of uncorrupted social reform to become the new super-power of the South. All those newly wealthy folks will need computers, after all.

      -FL

    2. Re:XP setup by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      The Czech version offers "Iveta's computer" (localized version of "Yvette's", obviously) and "the computer in the kitchen". They probably envisioned (at the end of 90's) that poor post-communistic families must had amassed enough boxen by that time to put at least some of them into kitchen for some reason. While I do have friends like that, most people found it weird. Googling for this phenomenon revealed at least one person who actually named his computer "Iveta's computer in the kitchen." Go figure. :)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
  109. Why? by Slash.Poop · · Score: 1

    Why has /. not updated the story to show that MS has apologized?

    "We are looking into the details of this situation," Microsoft spokesperson Lou Gellos said in a statement Tuesday. "We apologize and are in the process of pulling down the image."

  110. Reminds me of a Polish joke by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    A polish man finds a lantern laying on the ground.
    He takes it home and while cleaning it a genie appears.
    The Genie says:
    "For freeing me from the lantern, I shall grant you three wishes."
    The polish man thinks for a second and says "I wish for a mongol invasion of Poland, please."
    The Genie grants him his wish, the mongols invade, and then leave.
    The Genie says "Name your second wish."
    The man thinks for a moment and says "I wish for a mongol invasion of Poland, please."
    The Genie looks at bit puzzled, but grants him his wish.
    The Mongol invade, and then leave.
    "Now name you third wish"
    The man thinks for a bit and says "I wish for a mongol invasion of Poland, please."
    The confused Genie says "I'll grant you your wish, but would you tell me why you keep wishing for this?"
    The polish man says "Sure, each time the mongols invade Poland they have to go through Russia twice."

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  111. A slight retraction by spun · · Score: 1

    I've never been to Poland or Eastern Europe, only the UK, Spain, France, Germany, Italy, and Greece. If I recall, the further east I went, the fewer people of (recent) African descent I saw.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  112. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

    http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/7308/microsoftlocalisation.jpg

    So they replaced the black guy with Michelle 0bama...what's the difference? :-)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  113. Clearly... by Obispus · · Score: 1

    ...this is a case of a Reverse Polish "Soul Man".

  114. Re:Even better.. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    You can't one moment say that everyone is an individual, then the next moment say everyone is the same, depending on whichever suits your position.

    Oh yes he can. There's no law that what he says has to make any kind of logically coherent sense, which is lucky for him and for the inhabitants of our already crowded prisons.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  115. I have been in multiple meetings.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... with Black,. Asian and Caucasian attendants. I ma Mexican BTW.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  116. I think MSFT should be punished for its crime by cheap.computer · · Score: 1

    I think this is a serious crime, it shows that they have total disregard people and all they care about is selling their crap. I think MSFT should pay for this, probably give donations to http://www.uncf.org/ . I think they committed a serious hate crime

  117. Culture and ethnicity are NOT the same thing. by gknoy · · Score: 1

    Culture and ethnicity are NOT the same thing. Yes, often an ethnicity is considered to have an associated culture, but the implication does not go the other way.

    Surfers, D&D nerds, Skateboarders, cheerleaders: all of these are sets of people often considered to have a shared "culture". This culture, whether it's people in wetsuits freezing their toes off in water, or a bunch of teens jumping and dancing in front of a stadium, are orthogonal to an ethnicity. It's unrelated.

    We have black surfers, white surfers, and presumably could imagine Romani surfers. We have D&D nerds who are boys, some who are girls, some who are asian, some who are white, etc. If you go to a Rocky Horror Picture Show, you'll find a fairly diverse group (or, I did when I went), and it's hard to argue that the set of regular attendees are not part of a shared culture.

  118. I see. So you are saying Polish pople are racists. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clarifying your misinformed point of view ( for the record, I know many Polish people and I am sure they will be the most puzzled about somebody "needing" to do such image doctoring).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  119. They were poking fun at it, perhaps? by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    > I still find it odd that they would portray it on TV.

    I never found it odd, as I had always assumed that it was obvious that they were poking fun at bigotry in general by putting up Archie Bunker as a stereotypical uneducated bigot. It was also a meta-joke in a certain sense, in that it was stereotyped bigotry, so they were guilty of meta-bigotry while doing it.

  120. Bullshit. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    "You are dead" is not a term of abuse.

    Racism is when you think it is fine to joke about people with the clear intention to pander to stereotypes.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  121. Doubleplusgood One! by herojig · · Score: 1

    Doubleplusgood for MS the International Flavor. What a bunch of bozos in suits. The model defaced should sue in the Hague. Ironic, the advert speaks to empowerment of the people...must be that limited definition of "people" some folks in the EU have: Nazi Ethnicity Haters. Maybe that British Photoshop Law is needed after all:)

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  122. Inductive reasoning? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    What about willing misinformation?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  123. Hear, hear, hear. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Somebody that actually gets it.

    It is a shame that learning curve was so painful. Sorry dude :-(

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  124. What does that have to do with anything? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    How it comes that there are people out there that think Polish people can't possibly stomach the thought of buying something advertised by a black person?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:What does that have to do with anything? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with that. It has everything to do with speaking to a particular demographic in a marketing campaign. I'm going to use the same example I've used three other times in this discussion: advertising campaigns in Atlanta frequently heavily favor African Americans, because they represent a majority of the population in many areas. It's not racist, and I'm not offended by this as a white person.

  125. Poland knows more than most about racism by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Or where do you think Warsaw Ghetto was?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  126. Re:I see. So you are saying Polish pople are racis by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

    Well, this is besides the point (the GP didn't say anyone is racist, only that the image doesn't match the target society), but my experience with Poland is short lived and hurtful. It basically involves being beaten at a club by a gang of muscleheads who thought dark haired Spaniards were not good enough to hang around their turf talking to "their" girls. And this wasn't in a rural village, mind you, it was in frigging Warsaw in a touristy park by the river. I know it's anecdotal, but I've heard many similar stories, often coming from other people from East Europe in general and some Polish. It's unfortunate, but racism still subsides.

  127. The Germans. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The problem with people of your racist ilk, is that they mix and match terms without the sightliest regard for historical accuracy or even common sense.

    The atrocities commited by the Nazi regime did not excuse in any manner the atrocities perpetrated by others, to even suggest so gives carte blanche to the most unimaginable type of barbarism.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  128. Be careful, generalizations are often wrong. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    "Is it okay to mistreat Germans now? No. Of course not. Anyone born after WWII in Germany has no moral culpability for what happened then. I'm not even saying it should have happened that way. What I'm saying is this: After WWII, anything contemporary Germans got, they had coming to them, in spades, and sounds more like justice, rather than an atrocity."

    German descendants in today's Namibia were put in camps by the British (South West Africa, as it was known back then, was administered by them), they lost many family members during the war that had no allegation to the ideas of Nazism, they just went to fight for their country (German nationality has traditionally acquired by blood, irrespective of your birthplace).

    Women of all ages were raped by the Russians when Berlin fell, if you are suggesting that such actions are justice, I frankly want nothing to do with your notions of what is fair or not.

    Justice has to do with a civilized institution in which your alleged crimes are judged in accordance to fair laws.

    What you are advocating is not justice, it is just a different form of fascism.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Be careful, generalizations are often wrong. by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      "Is it okay to mistreat Germans now? No. Of course not. Anyone born after WWII in Germany has no moral culpability for what happened then. I'm not even saying it should have happened that way. What I'm saying is this: After WWII, anything contemporary Germans got, they had coming to them, in spades, and sounds more like justice, rather than an atrocity."

      German descendants in today's Namibia were put in camps by the British (South West Africa, as it was known back then, was administered by them), they lost many family members during the war that had no allegation to the ideas of Nazism, they just went to fight for their country (German nationality has traditionally acquired by blood, irrespective of your birthplace).

      I think I clearly stated that I don't agree with the mistreatment of contemporary (to our time) Germans.

      Women of all ages were raped by the Russians when Berlin fell, if you are suggesting that such actions are justice, I frankly want nothing to do with your notions of what is fair or not.

      If you think that I agree with such actions, you haven't been paying attention to what I wrote. I clearly stated (several times, in several places in this thread) that the treatment of German women and children by the Russian army was unjust. If you missed that, I'm saying it now.

      Justice has to do with a civilized institution in which your alleged crimes are judged in accordance to fair laws.

      That, I can't agree with. Frequently, justice has nothing to do with laws. I'm not advocating vigilante justice here (because that, too, is unjust, when the wrong person is targeted), but the fact that someone is pronounced "guilty", and punished under the applicable law, or pronounced innocent, and released in accordance with that same law, does not, in any way, mean that "justice" has been done. Justice is the right person being punished for the given crime, and the guilty party being punished in a way proportional to the crime. Guilty people frequently get acquitted, and innocent people get convicted. That's the inverse of justice.

      >

      What you are advocating is not justice, it is just a different form of fascism.

      I'm not sure my original post was "advocating" anything at all. I was merely making an observation. Namely, that human nature being what it is, and given what the democratically-elected German government did to the rest of Europe, and the German government's stated rationale for doing so, moving Germans into the boundaries of Germany proper was a fairly obvious thing to do.

      Consider this: If the Germans hadn't been moved into Germany after the war, and the citizens of those European countries had taken it upon themselves to drive the Germans out, would that have been better? The other factor you have to keep in mind is this: German nationals had been fed a steady diet of pseudo-scientific (to put it kindly) ethnophobic bullshit by the Nazis which didn't particularly make them good neighbors in multicultural societies. That was another reason to make sure Germans were (mostly, although not by any means entirely) within Germany.

      You can't wipe human nature out of existence merely because it can sometimes be unjust. Instead, you have to work around it, going for the best solution you can, out of a list of bad options.

  129. The one question nobody has asked is... by hrrY · · Score: 1

    How do you think that the african-american/ black Microsoft employees feel? Would they view this as "business as usual" or do you think that they might be offended? I would surely think that the consensus is probably split right down the middle in that context... Personally, I don't think that I would be able to help but feel a bit awkward at this point whether I was white or black(I'm black)but something like this could in fact create a rift in their business culture, because now they may have potentially damaged or tainted at the very least, the foundation of cultural diversity in their company...so at this point the white employees could be burdened with "white guilt" and the black employees will be burdened with the ever prominent sense of passive racism against them. So basically if there wasn't a racial line in that company before, then there surely is now. Way to go MS...

  130. Punishing whole populations ... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... is a war crime.

    Don't believe me please, check it out.

    What is "logic", fair or legal often have nothing to do with each other....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  131. So being anti-smite is not being racist? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I sometimes don't understand how the neurons of some people work ....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  132. You don't consider it racism? H-e-l-l-o-o-o-o by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You aren't serious, are you?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:You don't consider it racism? H-e-l-l-o-o-o-o by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Racism is discrimination based on race - a perceived-inherited trait. Discrimination based on culture and group behavior is an entirely different thing. I also "discriminate" against street gangs, whether they are Black or White or Asian or mixed - if they happen to be disproportionally Black though, does that make me racist towards Blacks?

      With gypsies, it's worth keeping in mind that statistically, the vast majority of those who are living the traditional gypsy lifestyle (with extended families in tribal tabors) are criminals - I don't have the numbers at hand, but I recall that they were something over 80%. So, just like when you see a Black guy in an attire and with manners and speech traditionally associated with gangs, it is reasonable to assume that he is a gang member, and treat him accordingly; so it is reasonable, upon seeing a group of gypsies in an attire and with manners and speech traditionally associated with tabor gypsy lifestyle, to assume that they are criminals, and treat them accordingly. Neither one is racist, though it may be perceived as such because of the observed significant overlap of the social group being discriminated against with some particular ethnicity/race. Well, what can I say - reality can be extremely politically incorrect like that at times.

      Tables can turn, though; for example, I'm Russian, and I know that in Baltic states, especially Estonia, Russians are the ethnic/cultural group most heavily engaged in crime, especially organized. I accept the truth of it, and understand the underlying reasons for that, however, and do not find that fact - or those people who state it - in any way racist.

  133. It's not only Microsoft by errxn · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is not the only company that does this. For example, I keep seeing these Apple ads where they Photoshop out all of the normal people and replace them with a bunch of murse-toting douchebags.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  134. In my first job here in London by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    We had a team of 20 people, give or take.

    A third of them were Irish, 2 or 3 women, my boss at some point, was an Irish lady.

    As London is London, we had 1 Nigerian and 1 Caribbean guy, then it was the guy from Bangladesh, Hong Kong and Gujarat, in India.

    We had some native English people as well of course.

    I am Mexican.

    So do you think we arranged our meetings in order not to offend the sensibilities of people that see "Political correctness" everywhere?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  135. I worked in Asia also. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Do Vietnamese, Indian, Mexican, English, Bangladeshi-America would do it for you?

    It really depends on the company and the field of expertise, what would surprise me nowadays is to enter a room with an homogeneous attendance.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  136. Wow, it's a sad day by S7urm · · Score: 1

    That both people, speaking to the lack of diversity in Poland, felt they had to post those comments as ACs, I understand this is based on speculation, but it's sad.

    Our PC world, or at least America's PC world, is killing thought...period

    --
    "This is the value of a summer spent and a winter earned"
  137. Yep,marketing people are known to pander to racism by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    So what is your point?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  138. There is no caste? by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    Equal before god? Depends on the god.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  139. Re:There is no king? by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    Did not think hard enough... Divine right to rule anyone? Does any god see believers equally?

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  140. common practice by mezcalhead · · Score: 1

    this is a common practice. it's called advertising and marketing! see an example from 2003 here: http://bit.ly/MS-ad

  141. Thanks God by microbee · · Score: 1

    Now all three heads are tilting in the same direction, finally.

  142. Re:I see. So you are saying Polish pople are racis by n+dot+l · · Score: 1

    Chances are, they hate your perceived wealth (or that of the country you come from) instead of (or at least more than) than your appearance. A huge portion of Central and Eastern Europe's wealth is held by Western European companies, and that's led to the perception that their land is being bought out from under them (and the economic turmoil in the region leaves no shortage of conspiracy theories that the West is economically undermining them to leave them unable to compete). That tends to generate a lot of ill will towards tourists from Western Europe, which is why the assorted racists get away with shit like that. When (well, if) the economy recovers most of that will vanish.

    An anecdote to match yours: my mother and I went to visit Bulgaria, where our family is from, about a year ago. We hadn't been in the country for decades (my family fled the Communists) but she still speaks the language very well. She went into a store to buy some boza (a drink common in the Balkans) and all they had was some in bottles, which she didn't want since it wasn't fresh (boza goes bad very quickly after its made, the preservatives they used to make it fit to bottle left it tasting flat and stale) and she asked if there were any shops that still made it fresh. Apparently there weren't, and hadn't been for many years, and asking gave her away as a Bulgarian who'd been living in a richer country for many years. As soon as she did that the store owner's demeanor changed from friendly to absolutely frigid. That happened several times in several different places, all in big cities (the people in the two villages we visited were actually quite friendly, generally asking questions about life where we live).

    Also common: seeing foreign (mostly British) tourists going on about how friendly the Bulgarian staff at hotels and restaurants is, completely oblivious to the subtle little slights and expressions of contempt (if not outright hostility) all around them (very subtle, you have to know the language very well to catch it). I've encountered that in several other places (I think snobby locals are to be expected as part of the tourist experience), but not even close to the degree I saw it there. A friend from Russia says the same is very common in his country, so I'm guessing the sentiment is fairly widespread.

  143. Re:Afirmative action is not racist. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Affirmative action might be justifiable racism but racism is remains.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  144. Re:If you really think a gypsy would lauch about t by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    You tell it to a Gypsy as an Italian joke.

    That's how I first heard it 20 years ago.

    The Gypsy will laugh his ass off (to distract you as his kids rob you blind).

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  145. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. Brilliant.

    Best thing I've seen on slashdot in years.

  146. What can I say... They're obviously A-Holes by dgreenhouse · · Score: 1

    I have no patience, tolerance or time for racists, bigots or fundamentalist tripe of any stripe. They can all crawl into to a hole laced with razors for all I care!

  147. who's foolin' whom???? by seekertom · · Score: 1

    I clicked on the 'mirror' link and saw the two scenes, top with a black guy at the table, lower with a white guy's head. However, clicking on the link above the lower pic brought me to the polish site, and the pic there has not been altered. Maybe I'm wrong, but looks like the slashdotters have been hoodwinked, and ms really didn't do the dasterdly deed at all! Corrections humbly accepted if offered.... thanks for lis'nin' seekertom

  148. Re:Dark Tan? - Long hair? by akayani · · Score: 1

    http://imagonullius.com/nick/balls.jpg

    Balls as in... well you can guess.

  149. High scrabble scores by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    I suspect I offended someone of Polish descent.

    Doubt it, most of them can't read.

    Seriously, some of the biggest tellers of Polack jokes I've known were had plenty of Zs and Ks in their names.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  150. Re:Even Stranger......still by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    You mean kinda like the "Stupid Polock" jokes ...?

    Is it really necessary to insult the retards ? Jeez..

  151. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by mjm1231 · · Score: 1

    Maybe so. That doesn't solve the mystery of why other groups are referred to as Dutch or English rather than Dutch-Americans or English-Americans.

    --
    Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
  152. Re:No African-Americans in Poland doncha know by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    Technically, it would just be European-Americans (Africa is a continent, not a country). But I think that's what's implied by "American." Native American is the term for "American-Americans," and American is the term for "European-Americans." Society tends to simplify things for the majority. You don't have "Native Europeans" or "Native Asians" do you?

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.